Slashdot Mirror


IBM Officially Kills OS/2

boarder8925 writes "'Big Blue has hammered the final nails into OS/2's coffin. It said that all sales of OS/2 will end on the 23rd of December this year, and support for the pre-emptive multitasking operating system will end on the 31st December 2006.' IBM has posted a migration page to help OS/2 users easily switch to Linux."

609 comments

  1. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It ain't dead until Netcraft confirms it!

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      what a shame.. os/2 had so much potential

    2. Re:Hey! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's right. I don't care what IBM says about it; I want empirical evidence. Has anyone counted the number of Usenet posts about OS/2?

    3. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noooooooooooooo !!!!!!

    4. Re:Hey! by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      4.

      1. I heard they were killing OS/2.
      2. Yeah, me too!
      3. F*ck OS/2
      4. Grow up, retard.

      Yeah. Four posts.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    5. Re:Hey! by KaptNKrunchy · · Score: 2

      I think netcraft all but confirmed it a long, long time ago.

    6. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit! I just bought a copy yesterday, and now I read this announcement...

    7. Re:Hey! by LilGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why oh why did I use all my mod points earlier. I almost fried my keyboard thanks to you! Definately deserved a point from me!

      Alas, I remember when I was about 7 or 8 visiting a computer store in Rapid City, SD called Reboot. They sold / bought used software, and I saw a copy of OS/2. I picked it up and thought WOW! ANOTHER os?! I didn't even know they existed aside from macintosh. I wanted it soooo bad, but my dad couldn't afford it. In retrospect I think he could, but he didn't want to have to format the hd and lose all his precious stuff.

      I became determined to get it. I mowed lawns until I had enough money to buy a stack of game cds from another store for $20 and sold it to Reboot for $25. But as I was going to pick up the OS/2 box I noticed Falcon 4.0 and couldn't resist.

      I made my dad proud. But I never tried os/2. :(

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    8. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that I was one of the folks who wrote a newsreader for OS/2 that a good number of people who still use OS/2 are using. (A group of nice folks got a "leaked" version of the source and still maintain it to this day) Ah, the nostalgia.

    9. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Hey! by dryeo · · Score: 1

      And it was the only thing here that really failed W2K. Nothing like posting messages from the 3900s.
      Anyways thanx for pronews, love it

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Hey! by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

      That's what I hear, too.

      Unfortunately, I haven't got far in my testing. I've been trying to install it since 1994.

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    12. Re:Hey! by Guppy06 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Next you'll be demanding NetCraft confirmation!

    13. Re:Hey! by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a wonder it took so long to die. It found its way into ATMs though, the newer ones use Windows and its obvious since they so unresponsive.

      OS/2 just showed that to take on Microsoft you have to have a strategy that deals with the dirty tricks they're likely to pull on you.

    14. Re:Hey! by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      ...in a galaxy far away?

      I think, if you look carefully at the security monitors that Obi Wan uses in Ep III, you can see a browser window open to Netcraft, confirming the death of OS/2. Another screen has Natalie Portman and Hot Grits on it.

    15. Re:Hey! by hendridm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I, too, was a youngling when OS/2 was a popular alternative. A buddy and I ran BBSs and we liked OS/2 very much. The multitasking was much better than DESQview. We could run the BBS and *gasp* still actually use the computer ;)

      Good times, good times...

    16. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. must be desperate for mods - what with giving mod points to a purported geek who has never even used OS/2!

      sheesh!

    17. Re:Hey! by drakaan · · Score: 1

      All that's left now is to wait for Simon's next BOFH episode on The Reg...I Imagine the BOFH will be pleased that from now on, new computers will come with absolutely no OS/2 on them.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    18. Re:Hey! by euphgeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Four posts.

      Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

      (Note: This comment is kind of funny, but you won't get it unless you read comp.os.os2.advocacy)

    19. Re:Hey! by HardCase · · Score: 1

      (Note: This comment is kind of funny, but you won't get it unless you read comp.os.os2.advocacy)

      (Note: If you have to explain why your comment is funny, it isn't)

    20. Re:Hey! by MarkGriz · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Alas, I remember when I was about 7 or 8 visiting a computer store in Rapid City, SD called Reboot. They sold / bought used software, and I saw a copy of OS/2"

      In keeping with their name, they now sell strictly Microsoft products.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    21. Re:Hey! by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      It's a wonder it took so long to die.

      But it hasn't! It has made its way into a lot of things, El Reg sheds a little more light on things: if you pay for support you get it, no matter how dead the OS is. It remains something companies find worth paying for, given the amount of infrastructure throughout the global economy it is embedded in.

      It first died in 2000, can keeps on dying!

    22. Re:Hey! by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      It's a wonder it took so long to die.

      But it hasn't! It has made its way into a lot of things, El Reg sheds a little more light on things: if you pay for support you get it, no matter how dead the OS is. It remains something companies find worth paying for, given the amount of infrastructure throughout the global economy it is embedded in.

      It first died in 2000, and keeps on dying!

    23. Re:Hey! by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      (Note: If you have to explain why your comment is funny, it isn't)

      Note:

      1st post:
      Re:Hey! (Score:5, Funny)
      by commodoresloat (172735) on Friday July 15, @03:09AM (#13069590)

      2nd post:
      Re:Hey! (Score:4, Funny)
      by darkpixel2k (623900) on Friday July 15, @03:32AM (#13069728) (http://www.darkpixel.com/)

      3rd post:
      Re:Hey! (Score:1)
      by euphgeek (624997) on Friday July 15, @04:14PM (#13073993)

      You:
      by HardCase (14757) on Friday July 15, @04:53PM (#13074454)

      He wasn't referring to his comment. Bad karma should not be directed, allow an individual to fall into that trap themselves.

    24. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah :) Be thankful for that bug as it's the reason the code was leaked (didn't have the time or even an OS/2 machine to fix it and didn't want to leave all of the users in the lurch).

      Anyhow, thank the current maintainer.

  2. Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines? by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last time I checked, large numbers of ATM machines ran OS2, which is why you don't see the BSOD when you go to grab some cash.

  3. Netcraft confirms it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Netcraft confirms it: OS/2 is...

    Oh, nevermind.

  4. I could have sworn he died 10 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew that OS/2 was still around?

  5. Wow. Do people still use this? by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I heard OS/2 was big in banking, but I just assumed they had moved off of OS/2 some time ago.

    1. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by yuriismaster · · Score: 1

      I know Bank of America in Nevada uses it on the teller's workstations. I recently went in and applied for checking, and saw OS/2.

      I laughed a little, then just went through the spiel of signing up.

      I'm sure BofA has it's own support though, and I wouldn't be too surprised to see them migrate to Linux, possibly with a terminal emulator to get that old 'classic' feel.

    2. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by croddy · · Score: 1
      the last time I used an AmTrak self-service kiosk, it was running os/2 warp 3.

      eComStation has been maintaining os/2 under license from IBM for a few years now.

    3. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Tandem is big in banking. Owned by Compaq now. Long history, cool looking and all together old school cool. But reliable.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Owned by Compaq

      ...who are owned by HP now. See the HP Integrity NonStop systems.

    5. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

      HSBC (UK) still uses OS/2 on all its branch workstations, hooked up to an AIX mainframe i believe.

      --
      Music is everybody's possession.
      It's only publishers who think that people own it.
      Fuck Beta
      ~John Lenno
    6. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frito-Lay still uses OS/2.

    7. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yep, got to love NonStop/Himalaya, it's the only non mainframe platform that I've used that comes close to the uptime and data integrity requirements of the mainframe world.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's right. I remember someone buying the other at some point. I think I remember it being funny that HP owned Tandem and then sold it only to aquire it again from Compaq? Could be mistaken.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    9. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by endy64 · · Score: 1

      OS/2 is also heavily used in their (UK) call centre, however I was told by a LAN support guy that they were going to move to windows. This was last year, no idea if it happened.

    10. Re:Wow. Do people still use this? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      I think I remember it being funny that HP owned Tandem and then sold it only to aquire it again from Compaq?

      I don't remember HP owning Tandem - perhaps you're thinking of Stratus, although HP didn't own them, they just were partners of theirs, at least to the extent that HP sold (and still sell) PA-RISC processors to Stratus.

  6. Quick Question... by Azadre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the OS/2 ran on older hardware similiar to what ran Windows 3.1? Should those that run OS/2 just upgrade to 3.1?

    1. Re:Quick Question... by Phil246 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats downgrading.

    2. Re:Quick Question... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      It depends which OS/2 you mean. The 1 series is a little lighter than Windows 3.1 and the upgrade makes sense . For 2 or 3 was a competitor of Windows 3.1 and better. If you are going to upgrade you can probably go all the way to Windows 98 or NT 4.0 (though both are worse in any objective sense). I stopped using it after 3.0.

    3. Re:Quick Question... by Losat · · Score: 1

      LOL!
      (OS/2 1.x was around when MS just had the awful Windows 2.0. OS/2 and Windows NT have common heritage; OS/2 2.x and Windows NT are roughly comparable (though NT had earlier/better SMP support).)

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on Slashdot.
    4. Re:Quick Question... by DarkMantle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct. OS/2 is a 32 bit OS, where 3.1 is not. However, OS/2 is also capable of running all windows 16 bit applications. Which is more then I can say for the new Windows.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    5. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOS + Windows 2.0 > OS/2 1.0, since there was no OS/2 gui at that point.

    6. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you're serious, but you can't buy Windows 3.1 anymore (and I don't see Diebold hunting eBay for dealz). Plus, I'm guessing they would want to use an unsupported OS. Wait, screw that, Windows 3.x sucks. They'd probably want something they can at least develop on.

    7. Re:Quick Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think so, I used DOS and Windows 2.0, and OS/2 1.0 was faster. GUI in Windows 2.0 sucked massive donkey bones; it was shit until 3.0 most people agree. I think it still sucked, or else games would have switched sooner. Most games didn't bother using the GUI shell to kick off until 95 came along and forced them to.
      And DOS 4 gets Mr. Gates a swift kick in the nuts if I ever meet him.

    8. Re:Quick Question... by madodel · · Score: 1

      Don't know about win2k or xp, but the SMP under NT sucked dead rocks. NT itself tied up one processor. Dual CPUs gave maybe a 20% advantage over a single CPU under NT, while under OS/2 I saw 50-90% increase depending on the task.

      OS/2 has always run rings around the bloatware from Redmond. One of the best things open sourcing OS/2 would do would be to give improved thread support for Linux.

      OS/2 lives as eComStation - http://www.ecomstation.com/

      See what is instore for the future of eComStation at this year's Warpstock 2005, in Hershey PA, October 5-9. http://www.warpstock.org/

  7. Year of Linux Desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a sure thing with all those OS/2 users coming over.

    1. Re:Year of Linux Desktop by chris_eineke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Relatively speaking this will be an increase by 100%....
      Absolutely speaking this will be an increase by 3! ;)

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    2. Re:Year of Linux Desktop by mvdw · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mis-spelled 'both'. HTH.

  8. Will it be opened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only fair don't you think?

    1. Re:Will it be opened? by ddillman · · Score: 1

      Won't happen. IBM doesn't own all of the IP in OS/2. Recall that there is better Win3.1 support in OS/2 than in Win3.1 itself, all based on Microsoft-owned code. There are other things, but that's the easiest example that springs to mind.

      --
      Little girls, like butterflies, need no excuse. -- L. Long
  9. OS2? by mutewinter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OS/2 is still around? Thats news to me! I guess I'm not a real geek, but that last time I heard anyone used that operating system was in 1995.

    1. Re:OS2? by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      OS/2 is still around? Thats news to me! I guess I'm not a real geek, but that last time I heard anyone used that operating system was in 1995.

      Same here. I got a free copy of OS/2 from a computer store in chicago back in 93 or 94. Everyone suspected OS/2 was going to die, and I think they were trying to get more people to use it.

      The version I had was very much like Win 3.1. Maybe a little nicer. But I could not get software to run on it. If OS/2 would have had games, I would have kept it longer.

      It is around the same time I got my HP 48gx calculator. And the HP is still in use.

      I wonder what will happend with all the OS/2 code? IBM should publish it and make it public. Maybe someone can use parts of it in non-commercial ways (so M$ does not exploit it).

      And what did OS/2 look like after the mid 90's. Were there any large updates? Any MMX stuff? Any DVD support? Any modern stuff added??

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm not a real geek,

      No, your not. In 1995 OS/2 Warp had 40% market share, but you were too busy sucking on the Nipples of Windows to notice. Have fun re-booting.

    3. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I wonder what will happend with all the OS/2 code? IBM should publish it and make it public. Maybe someone can use parts of it in non-commercial ways (so M$ does not exploit it).

      Good luck with that. Microsoft helped IBM develop OS/2; how do you think it ran Windows stuff so well? Since Microsoft probably still owns a good chunk of the copyrights, I sincerely doubt you'll ever see it opened

      I'd much rather see IBM release their Lotus suite as Open Source - there's still lots of things there that can be of tremendous use to the OSS community (Lotus Notes especially).

    4. Re:OS2? by Shag · · Score: 1
      The last time I personally remember using it was in 1994, in a data-entry temp job. MCI, I think it was, in Iowa City. I don't even know whether it was "Warp" or an earlier version.

      But some seriously crufty things live awfully long lives in data processing scenarios; in 1996 I was dealing with AOS/VS II. Yeah. Unfortunately, I didn't know about the undocumented "XYZZY" command in it back then. Shout outs to all the Slashdotters who've used AOS/VS II. I don't think I'm running out of fingers counting you. ;)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    5. Re:OS2? by jm92956n · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wonder what will happend with all the OS/2 code? IBM should publish it and make it public. Maybe someone can use parts of it in non-commercial ways (so M$ does not exploit it).

      I would love for IBM to publish the source for OS/2, but it won't happen for two reasons:

      1. Because OS/2 was written in conjuction with Microsoft, I'm sure the original agreement with MS prohibits this sort of action (and MS would never agree to it now, especially as the two aren't nearly as cozy as they once were).
      2. Companies that still use OS/2 would apply pressure against such an action if IBM even considered it. The code hasn't been through the same review that Linux has been subjected to, and I'm sure there's an exploit or two in there that could be readily discovered if the code were available (think: "if you ever want us to purchase your services again, don't open-source it").

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    6. Re:OS2? by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      It took 10 years for the news to reach IBM's Fortress-Of-Denial (TM).

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    7. Re:OS2? by Locutus · · Score: 5, Informative
      Good luck with that. Microsoft helped IBM develop OS/2; how do you think it ran Windows stuff so well?



      Good luck with that son, but I'm sorry to tell you that Microsft did NOT help IBM code OS/2 so it would run Windows. As a matter of fact, Microsoft did far more to STOP OS/2 from running Windows and Windows applications. When Microsoft was releasing betas of Chicago( Win95 ), IBM had Chicago apps running under OS/2. When Microsoft found out, they changed the OS so that a very small portion of the Win32 resources loaded up at the 1GB memory address. This was so OS/2 could not run ANY Chicago applications or the OS. It worked because OS/2 supported virtual memory up to 512MB.

      So you got that WAY WRONG. The bit about Microsoft licensing issues preventing opensourcing OS/2 is correct.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    8. Re:OS2? by KaptNKrunchy · · Score: 1

      Lotus kicked ass.

    9. Re:OS2? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      I used it until late 1998. At that point it became clear IBM had abandoned it for desktop users, so I switched to Linux and then to FreeBSD. A friend of mine didn't stop using it on his home desktop until 2001.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    10. Re:OS2? by user_ecs · · Score: 2, Informative

      > And what did OS/2 look like after the mid 90's. Great > Were there any large updates? yes - See http://www.ecomstation.com/ > Any MMX stuff? > Any DVD support? Yes > Any modern stuff added?? Lots of stuff

    11. Re:OS2? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Lotus actually still kicks ass, only in the form of Notes.

      My workplace uses Notes exclusively, and I have friends that use Notes in their workplace. And after using Notes, I don't see how anyone would want to use any other mail client - probably since we have so much invested in documentation in DBs on Notes..... Doesn't seem like that functionality exists in Outlook, right?

      --
      Karnal
    12. Re:OS2? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      We used it for a multi building HVAC/Elevator/Climate monitoring and adjustment system at a place I worked from '97-2000. They are still using it.

    13. Re:OS2? by jjp5421 · · Score: 1

      I felt handy for fixing one buildings HVAC system running a pre-Warp OS/2 OS. I bragged for weeks about fixing the AC that 3 Trane engineers failed to do. Long story short, it was really the long haul modem connection, but my 10 minutes of OS/2 experience in Highschool sure helped! JjP

    14. Re:OS2? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I bought a Windows 95 machine that had a four-gigabyte hard drive, and you're telling that Microsoft used more than 512 meg of it for swap!? It only had 32 meg of RAM.

      Or am I missing something?

    15. Re:OS2? by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      Both my father and my mother *still* use OS/2, though it's in the form of eComStation now, this is on relatively new hardware too. They've been using it (both OS/2 and eComStation) roughly since it's introduction. The same goes for all of the (about 4) machines at my father's office too.

    16. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1 GB memory address does not imply that 1 GB of space is used. Oversimplified: If you have data at 0-31 MB addresses and then 1 MB at the 1 GB address, you only store 33 MB of data.

    17. Re:OS2? by Cubeman · · Score: 1

      Virtual memory works in pages. You can have stuff at 1 GB *address* (not 1 GB of data) without having the preceding ~990 MB. It would be stupid to fill RAM and/or virtual memory with all the unused space.

    18. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm....

      Physical memory, virtual memory... not the same thing.

      A program can load resources at a gigabyte offset (virtual address 0x40000000), but it will still only require an amount of physical pages to satisfy the non zero pages.

      Ugh.. I'm drunk and don't feel like explaining it any better..
      Suffice it to say that the poster is correct and it has nothing to do with how much swap you have.

    19. Re:OS2? by Devistater · · Score: 1

      Uhm no. OS/2 doesn't run any windows stuff. And windows doesn't run any OS/2 stuff. Maybe during the early early alpha or beta days when MS and IBM were still pretending they were working together on windows and OS/2 in a friendly way and sharing stuff. But any retail versions were not compatible with each other.

    20. Re:OS2? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Actually OS/2 runs quite a few Windows apps thru Odin (think Wine) and NT (upto win2k at least) still has OS/2 1.x compatibility. Look in system32 for doscalls.dll and os2.exe

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    21. Re:OS2? by mollog · · Score: 2, Informative

      OS/2 v. 2.0 ran Windows 3.1 apps better than Windows 3.1. At the time, Microsoft was claiming that Windows 95 would run Windows 3.1 apps as well as apps written for 95. That turned out to be more Microsoft FUD. OS/2 v. 2.0 ran Windows 3.1 apps in isolated virtual shells. Even if the app crashed, burned, BSOD, OS/2 would never miss a lick. It's too bad that IBM wasn't able to sell OS/2, but Microsoft was able to out-market IBM.

      --
      Best regards.
    22. Re:OS2? by houseofzeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While probably true I suspect the OP was talking about OS/2's ability to run Windows 3.* apps, among other things. OS/2 was jointly developed by IBM AND Microsoft, not just IBM. While the two later split I doubt Microsoft were involved out of the goodness of their hearts and signed the IP away.

    23. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you don't understand what someone is writing, _and_ you can't find anythign on Google about it it's a troll??????

      I think you have too much faith in yourself and search engines....

    24. Re:OS2? by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are. The above poster was referring to virtual memory, not swap.

    25. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear fuckwit.

      Keep quiet.

      Signed, everyone who has an IQ above 40 and understands the concept of virtual memory.

    26. Re:OS2? by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Companies that still use OS/2 would apply pressure against such an action if IBM even considered it. The code hasn't been through the same review that Linux has been subjected to, and I'm sure there's an exploit or two in there that could be readily discovered if the code were available (think: "if you ever want us to purchase your services again, don't open-source it").

      Why would that matter? Those companies would just run the patched version.

    27. Re:OS2? by Deusy · · Score: 1

      Um did they even retail non-super-computers with 1 gig of memory in 1995?

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    28. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHY DON'T YOU SUCK ME, SUSAN.

    29. Re:OS2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JESUS CHRIST I havent seen a crappier email interface than that travesty called Lotus Notes!

      What in the holy hell are you smoking?

    30. Re:OS2? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Something you'll note that Microsoft didn't get around to implementing until NT 4. WoW on prior versions could not isolate Win16 apps from each other.

      For a while there, OS/2 *WAS* a better windows than Windows. And that was it's problem. And why it failed... and the extra 4 MB *MOST* people needed to run it...

    31. Re:OS2? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't go there Buddy. I've built entire CRM apps on Outlook. :-)

    32. Re:OS2? by Warpedcow · · Score: 1, Interesting

      FWIW, I'm posting this on my OS/2 machine. It's an Athlon 3000 with 1GB ram and over 1TB of RAID5 storage. It still has all the apps most people need (firefox, thunderbird, office suite, cd burning, irc, bittorrent, ftpd, httpd, smbd, etc)... I do have a seperate box for games (winxp)... but that's pretty much all it does...

      Yeah, I'll probably switch to some flavor of linux in the next year or two... or maybe OSX on intel... mmm... But OS/2 works today, and it'll probably work equally well tomorrow... and I'll reevaluate the situation tomorrow ;)

      --
      moo
    33. Re:OS2? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OS/2 is still around. This post is being written on an OS/2 machine, in Firefox. (The company where I work uses OS/2 nearly exclusively for desktops, and whenever it can for servers.)

      It has some advantages, but from a day-to-day use standpoint right now I feel it combines the worst of Windows and Linux: It doesn't have all the commercial support, and has a limited (MS-DOS like) comandline/compiler tools.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    34. Re:OS2? by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.ecomstation.com/ Someone is carrying on with OS/2 development. OS/2 isn't dead, it just got sold off and given a funny name.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    35. Re:OS2? by jate · · Score: 1

      So... if it weren't for everyone else -- ms being reason #1 -- IBM would definitely give the source out. Damn you, Microsoft!

    36. Re:OS2? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      4GB? Luxury! I had a 500MB hdd on my first PC. No, I didn't have a lot of space left once Win 95 was installed...

    37. Re:OS2? by Locutus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The OP stated that because OS/2 could run Windows applications, it must be that Microsoft helped IBM make that happen. That was pure bull and my reply was TRYING to shed light on how wrong that statement was.

      It appears that my reply glanced off the top of a few heads. Oh well, here it goes again....

      I guess my reply was more about OS/2's inability to run Windows apps beyond Win16/Win3.x, but the main point I was TRYING to get across was that although Microsoft ORIGINALLY worked with IBM to create OS/2, Microsoft had nothing to do with OS/2's ability to run Windows apps and after the split, they did things to PREVENT OS/2 from running Windows apps. Heck, they did things to prevent Windows app vendors from porting to OS/2 but that's another book...

      It was really the IBM DOS compatibility layer that enabled Windows to run in IBMs virtual DOS. Yes the full OS/Environment ran in OS/2s DOS session with some tweaks. One version, Ferengi, even would use the original Microsofts Windows 3.x installation disks to add Windows support. IBM had access to the Windows 3.x source code and I'm sure that helped. I was told that it was a combination of the OS2-DOS and the optimized Watcom compiler which made Windows run faster on OS/2 than on MS-DOS. After all, Windows 3.x and Windows 95/98/ME are all DOS based operating environments.

      It must have been Microsofts lies to the press which lead people to believe they were not DOS based operating environments. But everybody knows that Microsofts statements to the public/press are never factual and very seldom have any element of truth to them. Yeah, right. :-/

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    38. Re:OS2? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      you said what I was thinking( kinda ). ;-) But then I realized there are sooo many out there who never learned their way around the computer and don't have any idea what is going on under those icons and pretty decorations.

      It's a shame since the computer is not a single purpose machine like many would like it to be. It's value is in it's ability to be many things. Unfortunately, it's being sold as something anybody can use without any education in it's use / design. Heck, I know people who'll not touch their espresso machine because it's too complicated to operate but they think they are a computer expert and believe me, they are not even close.

      It is tough to be nice to some of these VERY NAIVE responses when there is so much information at their fingertips if they only knew how to use the search engines. Thanks for saying what I wouldn't. ;-)

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    39. Re:OS2? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Read the others posts to this thread and learn a little will you!

      Geesh.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    40. Re:OS2? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And how is virtual memory different from swap? Guess I'm missing some more stuff!

    41. Re:OS2? by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Memory

      They're related but different.

    42. Re:OS2? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      they changed the OS so that a very small portion of the Win32 resources loaded up at the 1GB memory address.

      I don't doubt you, it sounds like something Microsoft would have done, but is there any independent confirmation of this, somewhere on the Web this is described in more detail? Maybe a Usenet post somewhere?

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    43. Re:OS2? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      I don't remember where that information came from. It was probably an exchange with people in the OS/2 Warp beta program or someone at a conference. IBM never released a beta which worked with Chicago/Win95 apps but supposedly had that working inhouse until one of the Chicago betas showed up with the resource compiler putting code in the address space >1GB.

      Here is one place which mentions that Win32 apps still do this. See item #2 of the "Installation" section:
      http://www.goldencode.com/atlos2/notes/odin/odin-r eview.html

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    44. Re:OS2? by Schmedley53 · · Score: 1

      Funny, when I was poking around inside of OS/2 back in prehistoric times, I found the label Windows 4.0 on quite a few system files. Then the voices told me to stop...

      --
      More pie for all!
  10. OS2 is still in use? by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware OS/2 was still in use anywhere.

    Do any slashdotters actually use it? if so, where? (And WHY!?)

    1. Re:OS2 is still in use? by End11 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because linux is too mainstream now GOD even my mother can use it. To be a REAL geek now you have to use OS/2 and/or punchcards.

      --

      Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
    2. Re:OS2 is still in use? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      We wrote a large body of building automation software subsystems in OS/2. There was no easy way to provide the same functionality in Windows, so it was never cost effective to port it.

      To this day, we keep the central routing server and all the subsystems in OS/2 boxes that are treated like embedded control systems, and have written Windows 2K-based interface code that proxies everything as BACnet devices.

      OS/2 was a good combination of modern OS services (named pipes, threads, etc.) and easy development. Given how simple it was to access serial ports, we could easily interface via DigiBoard multiplexers and such, and could write a new system driver (including reverse engineering time) in less than six months.

      I'm the primary contact for IBM in our office, so they've been flooding me with information about porting these apps to Linux, which sadly, may never be cost effective.

      I am *very* sorry to see this event, even though I fully understand and appreciate all the factors that led to OS/2's demise. It's like watching a very dependable ship being sent to the bottom of the ocean because it's too expensive to keep it afloat.

      Oh well...

      Tim

    3. Re:OS2 is still in use? by richkh · · Score: 1

      My workplace does. It runs the entire POS system on dozens of our stores (anywhere from a few to a few dozen tills.) About 7-8 years ago we switched it over from 3 pieces of IBM big iron to 2 Dell desktops running Warp. Cut our power bills, at least. :)

    4. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      There isn't any information on IBM cutting off Serenity Systems and their eComStation OS/2 variant. That would be a good place for continued support and purchases.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:OS2 is still in use? by aastaneh · · Score: 1

      Believe or not, my boss uses it for a pop3/imap server (Hethmon Bros) Lucky for him, I recently built a postfix-cyrus-web-cyradm setup to replace the forsaken creation.

    6. Re:OS2 is still in use? by user_ecs · · Score: 1

      Serenity System has a direct license for eComStation that bypasses normal IBM OS/2 marketing and sales channels. They will be selling eComStation for many more years.

    7. Re:OS2 is still in use? by wasted+time · · Score: 1
      Do any slashdotters actually use it?

      Well I didn't have to use it myself but my former employer still has about 500-600 boxes from 1995 deployed as POS (both uses of the acronym) systems in a retail drug store environment.

      if so, where?

      Southeast US.

      (And WHY!?)

      PHBs are the owners + highly leveraged company + positioning for a buyout by someone more advanced?

      They were in the process of reviewing systems for replacement when I left. Last I heard they were planning a speedy two year upgrade path.

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    8. Re:OS2 is still in use? by afidel · · Score: 1

      About a year and a half ago I was part of a VERY large re-rollout of OS/2 at Washington Mutual. They had been running two boxes with KVM's for a large %age of their loan processors because they had some custom apps that were designed for OS/2. We took out the second box and upped the ram in the windows boxes. Then we installed a new XP image that included Virtual PC with an OS/2 image. This install was nationwide and included thousands and thousands of seats (hell just in Northridge they have a campus that's FOUR city blocks!)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:OS2 is still in use? by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      My mother's a punch card, you insensitive cl.. err.. sorry Mom. (she's upstairs reading this from her Gentoo machine machine)

      I'll take out the trash later mom.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    10. Re:OS2 is still in use? by minvaren · · Score: 1

      Repartee (Windows version linked to here) is one of the more popular mid-sized voicemail systems out there. Until two years ago, it ran strictly on OS/2.

      Administering one for three years, it never crashed. It locked up once, which we later chalked up to the long-dead UPS it was still plugged into.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
    11. Re:OS2 is still in use? by clickster · · Score: 0

      My last job was for a bank and I was surprised to find out that OS/2 runs most ATM machines (oh yeah, that's right, I said ATM "machine". WTF you gonna do about it?). It rarely crashes and does everything that is needed. I'm damn glad I'm out of the banking IT business. I feel sorry for the poor bastards who will have to support the machines one they run some form of embedded Windows. My understanding what that ATMs were moving over to MS already. Poor, poor bastards. I don't think there was much of a push in the banking industry to move them to Linux unfortunately. I would still prefer OS/2 over Windows, Linux, BSD, etc. any day. It's the good kind of "security through obscurity"

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    12. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Detritus · · Score: 1
      I helped write a data acquisition and processing system that is still in use today. It is used to capture experiment data from analog magnetic tape, turn it into digital products, and send the results over the Internet to a data archiving system.

      When it was initially developed, OS/2 was the best operating system available for the task. It probably still is. Rewriting it for another operating system would be very expensive and would provide few benefits. The system runs well on a AMD 486-133 PC with a SCSI host adapter, Ethernet NIC, frame synchronizer, time code reader, and an intelligent ADC board. Much of the expensive custom hardware would have to be redesigned or replaced if the PC was "upgraded".

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    13. Re:OS2 is still in use? by afidel · · Score: 1

      I wonder if IBM supports the crypto card that is at the heart of the ATM network under Linux? Because without support for those cards there is zero chance of Linux replacing OS/2 in the ATM space.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:OS2 is still in use? by burnin1965 · · Score: 1

      Gasonics PEP wafer processing equipment has been running on OS/2 since Warp 3.

      Gasonics was purchased by Novellus but the PEP 3510 and PEP Iridia are still manufactured today.

      http://www.novellus.com/products/prosetup.asp

      The PEP platforms in the factory I work in are running either Warp 3 or Warp 4 on old IBM industrial PCs which are old 486s. Recently I put together a set of Shuttle Pentium 4 PCs and went through the pain of figuring how to get Warp 4 installed and working with the new hardware. As the 486s die I'll replace them with new hardware and Warp 4.

      burnin

    15. Re:OS2 is still in use? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I use it as my home desktop. It just works and has for close to 10 yrs. I've tried migrating to Linux quite a few times but it easier just to compile everything to run on OS/2 and I've yet to find anything that even comes close to the WorkPlace Shell. OS/2 has had X for over 10 yrs and all the Gnu stuff as well. Since all the fanatics went to Linux the community is also very good.
      It is also nice not worrying about security updates, viruses and spyware though I do have to update things like zlib now and again

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an old IBM Thinkpad in good condition under this roof that is running OS/2 Warp Connect, vintage about 1995-1996. Why? I have no idea. It just keeps going and going and going...

    17. Re:OS2 is still in use? by jejones · · Score: 1

      It's like watching a very dependable ship being sent to the bottom of the ocean because it's too expensive to keep it afloat.

      Thank you! That's the perfect metaphor. OS/2 is the Mary Ellen Carter of operating systems.

      "with smiling bastards lying to you everywhere you go..."

    18. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS/2 is a ROCK SOLID server OS. As a file server, it is a lot faster than Linux+Samba on much lighter weight hardware (our PIII's with 1GB of ram outperform the dual P4 Xeon blades running Linux). It doesn't have as many features as Linux+Samba, and it is impossible to find new software for it, but OS/2 is an absolutely fantastic server platform.

    19. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      If you're doing BACnet, for the love of your own sanity, get the 2.6 kernel.

      You do not want to try to implement MS/TP with 2.4....

    20. Re:OS2 is still in use? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      We used Cimetrics BACstac library to build a gateway application that runs under XP/2000. No MS/TP... BACnet/IP.

      Tim

    21. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. IBM uses it to drive its own mainframe 35xx ATL tape/34xx silos, and maybe a few VTS's out there, and ATM's.

      As for not opensourcing it, how on earth does this advance science and the arts, and people who purchased OS/2 but have not yet been compensated.

    22. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Deusy · · Score: 1

      Why not migrate to eComStation, which seems to revive OS/2?

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    23. Re:OS2 is still in use? by Deusy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, forgot to give the link!

      There's also this site providing unofficial support for OS/2 as well as eCS.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    24. Re:OS2 is still in use? by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      "What OS are you going to use now?"

      "What ever I feel like, gosh!"

      --
      sig?
  11. Open Source OS/2 by katana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's too bad that Microsoft owns so much of OS/2. It would be great to see it released as Open Source. The Open Source OS/2 Petition is a good start.

    1. Re:Open Source OS/2 by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

      You know, I've never used OS/2, but I would have signed that petition had it not been for the fact that I noticed three English mistakes in my first four seconds of skimming that petition. I don't know about anyone else, but that kind of shoddy editing makes me think that perhaps the petition isn't quite serious.

      (And for the record, I intend the above as constructive criticism, not insult.)

      ~UP

      --
      Eat the Path.
    2. Re:Open Source OS/2 by karnal · · Score: 1

      but that kind of shoddy editing

      What are you doing on Slashdot? :)

      But seriously, I agree - if you're going to create something that you expect to be accepted by anyone in a professional manner, you may as well go that extra mile to make it a professional presentation.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Open Source OS/2 by Nathan+Robertson · · Score: 1

      I heard OS/2 has a lot of assembly code in it too, and a lot of the code is Microsoft's and other third parties. After all, it was the result of a collaborative agreement with Microsoft.

      While we're on that point - In all seriousness, has IBM ever been involved in a partnership development of an OS that has been successful (disclaim Linux - they don't control it). The only two cases I can think of were Project Monterey and OS/2 - both were heralded as the next big thing, and neither delivered.

      So the question is - is partnering with IBM a good thing?

    4. Re:Open Source OS/2 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Partnering with IBM might have been good for Microsoft, assuming that Microsoft didn't really want OS/2 to flourish.

    5. Re:Open Source OS/2 by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, I have a copy of OS/2 at home, but I can't get it to work or even install on any of the PCs I have. The thing is just too bloody outdated. All the effort that would be required to get it to work, then fixing all the security holes that are bound to be there, would be much better spent developing another OS, IMO.

      It's a shame OS/2 didn't beat the technologically inferior Windows 9x series. But on the other hand, a world in which it did would probably be a world in which IBM _and_ Microsoft dominated the OS market together. Thinking about it that way makes me prefer the way things happened in this world.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    6. Re:Open Source OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How about AIX? It's been around for a good long time.

    7. Re:Open Source OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you kidding? What about OS/390/VMS and all the mainframe predecessors? The government actually sued them over being a monopoly, remember? Of course they were successful. For a while they enjoyed quite a UNIX marketshare with AIX (RS/6000) also. Not to forget the mini-computer market: the AS/400 was extremely successful, and there are still many installations of that now that run small businesses.

    8. Re:Open Source OS/2 by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that Microsoft owns so much of OS/2. It would be great to see it released as Open Source. The Open Source OS/2 Petition is a good start.


      MS owns large parts of OS/2 1.x and 2.x. They split with IBM during the development of 3.x. What was to be OS/2 3.0 was released as Windows NT 3.1.

      After the split, IBM re-wrote most of the MS code and released OS/2 Warp 3.0. With the release of Warp 4.0, there is very little, if any, MS code left in OS/2. There may be code licensed from others, though,
    9. Re:Open Source OS/2 by XO · · Score: 1

      ...but the workplace shell... would be absolutely farking invaluable on today's systems. There's nothing in the world that comes close to it.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    10. Re:Open Source OS/2 by mrmazda · · Score: 1

      What do you think keeps OS/2 users from migrating to Linux? KDE is molasses compared to the WPS, besides having half the functionality. Try running DOS SVGA text apps on anything else besides DOS while you're at it. M$ can't do it. Maybe Linux can, but I have yet to figure out how.

    11. Re:Open Source OS/2 by mrmazda · · Score: 1

      Have you tried installing Win95 or RedHat 3 on anything lately. OS/2 installs on modern hardware as easily as anything else, but you need a version that isn't 9 years old. Try the latest: http://www.ecomstation.com/

    12. Re:Open Source OS/2 by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      After the split, IBM re-wrote most of the MS code and released OS/2 Warp 3.0.

      Actually IBM went back to the 2.x code and worked from there.

    13. Re:Open Source OS/2 by XO · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure what "DOS SVGA text apps" are .. actually, I've just started using KDE... from remote. It's ok, I guess. Definitely faster than the current generation of GNOME that's included with Fedora. At least on a remote system. Bleah.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  12. So long! by Losat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I loved OS/2 back in its day! I first grew to hate Microsoft as I watched them try to kill it with "Chicago" vaporware and FUD.
    I wonder how the 850M MS just paid IBM over it compares to the damage MS really did.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:So long! by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Or look at it this way, if OS/2 grew into something like Windows, IBM might not have supported Linux. Linux without IBM is definitely possible but IBM certainly contributed a lot to Linux both financially, legally, and technologically.

      Linux is now the #2 threat to Microsoft after economic conditions. In an ironic, karma kind of way, Microsoft's underhanded ways hurt them more. If it was just OS/2, Microsoft might not have to worry about a competitor and a new way of developing software that could render its business model obselete. It's also hard to imagine Apache and all the other open source software without Linux, thought it is entirely possible. I know open source started before Linux. But the threat to Microsoft wouldn't be the same without Linux. Linux wouldn't be where it is without IBM. IBM might not have helped if OS/2 wasn't undermined by Microsoft. Karma.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    2. Re:So long! by rzbx · · Score: 1

      There is a very good reason a very large portion of the IT workforce is at the very least upset about Microsoft. The very foundation of the company was law, business, and getting away with things that just fell right below the law somehow. They have continued in that tradition. Microsoft probably owes its very existance to a few of these unethical practices. Sure Microsoft (essentially the wealthiest of Microsoft) has donated lots of money to various organizations, or even created their own. But there is no need for damaging behavior that hurts us all. By failing to work with the market and using whatever means necessary to simply stay ahead and grow ever more hungry and greedy, they hurt IT and other areas as well. So yea, of course most of us hate Microsoft in some certain way, hoping they will stop or the law we can all agree to follow is enforced on them. Yea, you can call me a Microsoft basher. They really are full of crap and deserving of it too.

      So why do we still use their products? Well, that is the funny part...

      --
      Question everything.
    3. Re:So long! by 2short · · Score: 1

      Bah. IBM killed OS/2. I went to Comdex "back in the day". At the IBM booth, you could fill out an application and they'd consider whether you were a sufficiently worthy developer that they should deign to let you to pay for a copy of the OS/2 SDK.
      Meanwhile, how to get the Windows SDK? Walk within throwing distance of the MS booth looking vaguely geeky (then try to catch one of the first ones, so they'll quit pelting you)
      IBM failed to make the expected profits on SDK sales, and lots more apps got developed for Windows. Shocking.

    4. Re:So long! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto - OS/2 was way ahead of windows, until windows95 came out (and then it was hard to tell). I ran it very successfully on 386 hardware with 16MB of RAM, with no problem. Of course, the single-threaded input queue, which helped with performance, did lock up sometimes ... but man, it was definitely out there in front of windows!

    5. Re:So long! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a very good reason a very large portion of the IT workforce is at the very least upset about Microsoft. The very foundation of the company was law, business, and getting away with things that just fell right below the law somehow. They have continued in that tradition. Microsoft probably owes its very existance to a few of these unethical practices.

      How Very.

  13. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1, Informative

    OS/2 may not show the BSOD, but it does crash from time to time. Even in ATMs. It's hard to find an O/S that never crashes.

    That's not a big deal, though. A friend told me that he lost his ATM card late one stormy night, when the ATM crashed and rebooted mid-transaction. That was when he found it was a Unix box... because the boot messages came up on the monitor...

  14. How about orphaning? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they won't support it, why not open the source and release it as such?

    1. Re:How about orphaning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As other people here have mentioned, OS/2 was originally a cooperative project between IBM and MS (before MS decided to concentrate on its own Windows OS). It might be really hard for them to seperate out anything MS might still have rights too.

    2. Re:How about orphaning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could always have an "unintentional" leak of the source code, a la Half Life 2. Blame the break-in on the North Koreans or something.

  15. Easily switch to linux my ass by Zuke8675309 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From IBM's "migration page"...
    "There are no replacement products from IBM. IBM suggests that OS/2 customers consider Linux as an alternative operating system for OS/2 client and server environments."

    They aren't helping anyone switch. They're just saying people should use linux since OS/2 won't be supported.

    1. Re:Easily switch to linux my ass by croddy · · Score: 1

      well, they're providing documentation, among other things. and honestly... unless you're an IBM customer, you're really not in a position to say what they're offering and not offering.

    2. Re:Easily switch to linux my ass by Locutus · · Score: 1

      IBM has published a number of development articles on migrating from OS/2 to GNU/Linux. Just because they didn't list them in the press release doesn't mean they don't exist.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    3. Re:Easily switch to linux my ass by shish · · Score: 1
      Ummm... read the sentance after the one you commented on:

      IBM Migration Assistance

      IBM Software Services for WebSphere and IBM Global Services (IGS) provide:
      * Design, build, test and deploy e-business application services
      * Branch infrastructure strategy, design, and migration services

      IBM Global Services Linux Porting Service Practice provides custom application porting services for customers wishing to incorporate Linux into their application platform strategy.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  16. migration strategy by markov_chain · · Score: 5, Funny

    To help switch to Linux, they are assigning a different engineer to each of the 12 customers. Talk about service! :^)

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    1. Re:migration strategy by femtoguy · · Score: 1

      Hey!! I still run it, and personally know two more people. I don't believe that I know that much of the world.

    2. Re:migration strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't laugh the OP may actually be telling the truth. IBM often does this for its biggest customers. They are assigned their own diplomat within IBM as it were as as well as their own developers.

    3. Re:migration strategy by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Is the "12" a typo? I thought it was called OS/2 for a reason...

    4. Re:migration strategy by lrucker · · Score: 1

      Heh. That was part of the problem with IBM's support for OS/2, actually - IBM never quite grasped the idea of shrinkwrapped software. At the ColoradOS/2 developer's conference around 93 or 94, someone from IBM came out to answer questions. Many of the answers included "well, just talk to your IBM rep" - now, Big Iron customers may well have their own personal reps, but all any of us had was a phone line to IBM support.

  17. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hate thinking of ATM machines - I can never remember my PIN number.

  18. Strange Bedfellows by prosphora · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news tonight Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds were reported to have been involved in a secret conspiracy which...included suckering Steve Jobs into going x86...

    1. Re:Strange Bedfellows by adam31 · · Score: 1
      Maybe this is your point, but notice how vividly both Microsoft and Linux are moving away from x86? I mean, Microsoft must be sinking quite a lot of money into producing, then providing a development environment for an in-order heavily pipelined SMP PowerPC... a lot of cutting-edge technology that can't be leveraged into other projects, unless.......

      IBM, meanwhile has already sunk a lot of money into making the Cell, and you can be sure that Linux is meant to be its baby. Sony has already announced you can buy it along with your PS3.

      (P.S., I didn't mean 'Linux is moving away...' so much as 'IBM is morphing linux away...')

  19. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by maotx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IBM has posted a migration page to help OS/2 users easily switch to Linux.

    Sounds like Windows will have competition on an even wider base.

    Any cost predictions for such a wide migration? OS/2 is on a fairly wide range of ATMs as it is.

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  20. IBM support for linux by kyndig · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, OS/2. May you rest in peace. And please stop scratching the coffin from the inside. It upsets the bereaved
    Ahh hah hah hah! :: wipes a tear from eye ::

    What I really find interesting is that IBM has offered a migration HOWTO for the OS users, and its to Linux. Always nice to have the big boy support.

    --
    My Thoughts, Kyndig
  21. Re:first post by Mystic0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You fail it!

  22. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want me to send it to you in an IM Message?

  23. Obligatory eComStation Plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eComStation, the OS/2 distro. Time to migrate from your Amiga!

    1. Re:Obligatory eComStation Plug by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Someone mentioned "Amiga," so here's my obligatory response. I'm just curious why I should upgrade my BSD5 Amiga?

      Here's another random thought: since the word "of" is considered of low importance when included in titles and not capitalized, and when used in acronyms the "o" is usually just dropped, shouldn't a "Blue Screen of Death" technically be termed a BSD? And would that have cost Microsoft another lawsuit?

  24. Why kill OS/2??? by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've never used it (maybe it deserves to die) but I'm surprised IBM didn't spin-off OS/2 sales & support as a little services company (with an appropriate slice of the proceeds of the service contracts). If people want to use OS/2, why not sell it to them? If people need support for it, why not sell it to them?

    I could understand a company killing a product that competes with its own more modern systems, but how do continued OS/2 sales hurt IBM more than orphaning some existing customers?

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They did spin it off. Its now call eCommStation. http://www.ecomstation.com/

    2. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "I could understand a company killing a product that competes with its own more modern systems, but how do continued OS/2 sales hurt IBM more than orphaning some existing customers?"

      It's probably because keeping up with the support/packaging/distribution was starting to cost more than they made from sales and support profits.

    3. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      If people want to use OS/2, why not sell it to them? If people need support for it, why not sell it to them?

      Because it's not cost effective.

    4. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by Deusy · · Score: 1

      They already did, didn't they? I thought that's what eComStation was, an OS/2 spin-off.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    5. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      I've never used it (maybe it deserves to die)

      I did use it, many moons ago, and I can say that it most definitely didn't deserve to die. When it came out, it was a fantastic OS. While it hasn't been terribly important since, I think it deserves a short moment of silence nonetheless.

      ........

      Goodbye, OS/2.

    6. Re:Why kill OS/2??? by XO · · Score: 2, Informative
      They did, a few years ago. ecomstation has been the only upgrades of OS/2 to come out besides fixpaks from IBM in several years.
      eComStation product plan calls for sales of eComStation through mid-2007. Even then, there are no plans to terminate the product. That is simply the time frame of the current product plan.


      On July 12, IBM announced withdrawal of active marketing and end of support for OS/2, see http://www-306.ibm.com/software/os/warp/announceme nts.html IBM had previously endicated end of service for OS/2 Warp 4 is December 31, 2006, and the withdrawal from active marketing as of December 23, 2005, indicating IBM will not sell OS/2 Warp 4 after this year.

      This announcement covers the IBM plans for the IBM distribution of the OS/2 products. The announcement does not impact OEMs who may use OS/2 and other IBM products as part of their product solution.

      "eComStation will remain available as long as it is a good business. There is no end in sight". - Bob St.John, Director of Business Development,Serenity Systems International
      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  25. Linux gain by mfloy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OS2's loss is linux's gain. Is anyone really suprised with this? I think we have all seen this coming for quite some time, and it was more a matter of "when" than "if".

    1. Re:Linux gain by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Linux is just as much, if not more of a pig, than Windows when you throw a GUI on top of it. It isn't of much use on older machines that can still run quite nicely with OS/2 and its GUI.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Linux gain by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

      It will only be Linux's gain if the users actually migrate to it. If linux can somehow run OS/2 code, that'd be a huge advantage over going to Windows, but really, what would stop the people from rebuilding with Gates?

      --
      Why slashdot? Why not?
    3. Re:Linux gain by Randseed · · Score: 1
      Today I fired up an old Pentium 133 machine that I had in mothballs with the intent of using it as a secured file server, internal mail server, and internal low-load database server. The system should be able to handle all that just fine.

      On the other hand, it's been compiling its systems upgrade for hours now, and is just now on package 10 of 118. Right now, it's compiling gcc 3.4.4, and by the looks of it, it'll be compiling this stuff until the weekend.

      Linux is very, very, very good at making the best out of low-value hardware. I do wish compiling was faster like it was "in the good old days."

      How does this relate to the parent? Simple. I have a P4 laptop with 512MB of RAM, and sometimes even it runs like a pig in X11. Most of that is because software authors insist on having obscene memory footprints for their packages. (Come on, 50MB+ to run a file sharing program? Good lord. Stop writing it in Java.)

      And for the people who are unable to see the obvious, no I am NOT running a GUI or anything of the sort on that P133, no I don't expect things to be optimized for that kind of low-end hardware (I'd bitch if it was), and no I don't use that previously mentioned filesharing program for just that reason.

  26. In related news... by Atario · · Score: 1

    Apple Macintosh System 6 and Microsoft Word For DOS are being end-of-lifed in a couple of years, so better start having planning meetings on that. You know, as long as you're at it and everything.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  27. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by hullabalucination · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your PIN number is 1583. Write this down and for goodness' sake, don't reveal it to another living soul.

  28. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Losat · · Score: 1

    Don't the ATMs still run OS/2 1.x? Or have they been upgraded ages ago?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on Slashdot.
  29. OS/2 is dying? by debilo · · Score: 4, Funny


    As a *BSD user, I really feel great today!

    1. Re:OS/2 is dying? by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

      As a *BSD user, I really feel great today!

      Don't cheer too much. It was the fact that there was a lot of "Copyright by the University of Berkeley" in the with OS/2 .h files which made me go with FreeBSD instead of with Linux.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  30. Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by WarmNoodles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SHAMELESS plug for MOD INFORMATIVE But this site claims to have the un official counts of OS/2 licenses world wide. http://rover.wiesbaden.netsurf.de/~meile/los2cl.ht ml Discounting the 500,000 set top boxes, apparently their are about 65,535 licensed installations out their. Hmm, maybe this is why os/2 blew its marketing stack.

    1. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by MarkRose · · Score: 1, Informative

      I can't believe someone modded that "interesting". It's a joke, people! 65,535 is the highest value an 8 bit int can hold, and there is no reference to this number on the linked page. That, and WarmNoodles chose the wrong joke: it should be something about integer overflow, not blowing the stack ;)

      --
      Be relentless!
    2. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol - itza joke

    3. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Eh... 16 - bit Unsigned Int.

      An 8-bit unsigned int only good for 0-255.

    4. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by chris_eineke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can't believe someone modded that "interesting". It's a joke, people! 65,535 is the highest value an 8 bit int can hold,
      Good thing no one has modded you up yet. When you leave, please use the back-door and hand your club card to the bouncer that looks like a cowboy.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    5. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      Ah shit, while I was busy writing a witty post, someone came along and modded you up.
      Congratulations!
      Next time (and there will be a next time, I promise) get your facts straight.

      ;)

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    6. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by dryeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually an IBM guy unofficialy said about 10 million users last year. Sun figured 20 million (they're targeting their Java desktop at them)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually it's 16 bits... where have all the real programmers gone?

    8. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I am also corrected. Oops! :)

      --
      Be relentless!
    9. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by MarkRose · · Score: 1

      I was, uhh, using quaternary bits ;) Naw, it was a brain fart. Thanks for correcting me :)

      --
      Be relentless!
    10. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by Devistater · · Score: 1

      Plus, tons of ATM's are running OS/2. I tihnk its still at least 50% of the market for ATM machines. And there are tons and tons of them out there.

    11. Re:Os/2 Propaganda or accurate user counts by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Discounting the 500,000 set top boxes, apparently their are about 65,535 licensed installations out their.

      Imagine how many licensed installations they could have had if they'd used an unsignedlong for their license control system instead! The world would truly be a different place.

  31. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I entered my PIN number into an ATM machine, and took out $60 dollars.

    I know, I should STFU up...

  32. They didn't say anything about the eComStation OEM by Locutus · · Score: 4, Informative

    So, while it looks like IBM is stopping sales(2005) and general support(2006), OS/2 will still be shipping and supported by Serenity Systems via eComStation.

    OS/2 is dead, long live OS/2.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  33. First TopView, now OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember TopView? That was an early event-driven OS that ran on top of PC-DOS and was text-only, but had some Windows capability and multi-tasking.

    There was a story where someone at IBM put a stack of old TopView boxed copies in the lobby with a sign "FREE Take one".

    A week later, they counted and found three more copies in the stack!

    I wonder if the same would happen with OS/2?

    All kidding aside, I made some good money from the OS/2 lovers out there. They ran conferences that meant something and were informative, and they hired good speakers. In some respects, the OS/2 crowd were like Macintosh boosters in suits, and the OS was worth the crowing. Unfortunately, IBM forgot that Apple ][ were sold as "Visicalcs" and IBM PC/Compaq computers were sold as "1-2-3". OS/2 never had the visibility of having must-be-there business applications.

    It's very interesting that IBM is recommending that OS/2 people move to Linux. I've not investigated their migration tools and aides, but this could be the basis for a Windows-to-Linux migration down the road.

    One thing I won't miss is Jerry Pournelle calling it "oh ess half".

    1. Re:First TopView, now OS/2 by jbolden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OS/2 never had the visibility of having must-be-there business applications.

      Ah,... Microsoft Lan Manager. Problem was that a PS/2 90 running MS Lan manager server was easy to administer cost about $10k and could replace a $200k AS/400. Had IBM gone for it they could have basically had hte move from expensive servers to cheap servers 5 years earlier and on their OS.

  34. Lets Open Source OS/2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign the petition at:
    http://www.os2world.com/petition

  35. Really? I haven't noticed... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Was the article date correct? It wouldn't be the first time that /. posted an article that was dated years ago.

  36. OS X Is Next Inline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Steve would love to axe the whole Mac/OS X stuff and go on to focus Apple on trying to expand out from the iPod fad.

    After that Windows.

    And we will be left with Linux/open source unix implementions as the era of desktop/workstations come to an end.

    1. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Please pass the bud.

    2. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      OS-X is superior to OS/2 anyday thanks to Darwin. I used OS/2 till version 4 and moved to a Macintosh. I haven't used OS/2 since. It is a good move to kill OS/2 and move to Linux.

      The loss of WPS is a pity though. People who haven't used an object oriented desktop like WPS don't know what they are missing. All that the Linux and Windows (and to some extent Macintosh) crowd know are Windows in their desktop. I loved the templates and the ability to print without running the application, etc. Maybe Steve Jobs will pick up on those in Leopard.

    3. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      And we will be left with Linux/open source unix implementions as the era of desktop/workstations come to an end.

      Yeah, and tablet PCs will take over any day now.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    4. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      > I loved the templates and the ability to
      > print without running the application,

      Back in the "classic" MacOS, you could print a file by dragging its icon into the printer icon. OSX is wonderful, rock-solid, yadda yadda - but I miss some of those old tricks.

    5. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      > Back in the "classic" MacOS, you could print a file by dragging its icon into the printer icon

      Not in the early days. The whole Mac "desktop printer" UI was actually borrowed from OS/2.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    6. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      Its people like you that make me think society is doomed.
      Is there an 'asshole' modpoint, or do you just have to say 'Troll' and 'Flamebait'?

    7. Re:OS X Is Next Inline by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Back in the "classic" MacOS, you could print a file by dragging its icon into the printer icon.

      Yeah, and "desktop printing" was one of those things notorious for weird and wonderful problems on MacOS...

  37. Quite a shock by Council · · Score: 2, Funny

    This of course came as a shock to the dedicated OS/2 userbase, which had recieved no hints that it might no longer be in the forefrunt of the computer culture . . .

    --
    xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    1. Re:Quite a shock by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      shock to the dedicated OS/2 userbase

      It's okay, I just got back from the hospital and he's doing much better now :).

  38. It used to be Windows... by stoph+ct · · Score: 1

    User, did you say you're having problems with OS/2? The answer is simple, just switch to Linux.

  39. By the way... by debilo · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's an interesting discussion over at OSNews about this very topic. It seems like OS/2 still has a relatively big fan base, someone mentioned three or four native Mozilla/Firefox ports alone!

    1. Re:By the way... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'm reading this on Seamonkey {build ID 2005071308} on OS/2 right now. Built Deer Park right after as well.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  40. Technically they aren't saying switch to Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


    From the page here it looks as if IBM is saying that OS/2 apps should be migrated to WebSphere.
    I'm sure that they mean WebSphere on Linux, but it could as well run on Windows too, or Solaris or AIX.

  41. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by def · · Score: 1

    Thats ok, since they're being replaced with Diebold Brand Media Players.

    --
    WRCT Pittsburgh, 88.3FM
  42. Apple Officially Kills OS X PPC by VAXGeek · · Score: 0

    "'Big Fruit has hammered the final nails into OS X PPC's coffin. It said that all sales of OS X PPC will end on the 23rd of December this year, and support for the pre-emptive multitasking operating system will end on the 31st December 2006.' Apple has posted a migration page to help OS X users easily switch to Linux."

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
  43. It's not dead until... by Bin_jammin · · Score: 1

    some really obscure project needs something compiled against a really obscure piece of hardware running it, and has a hardware failure.

  44. Think of the marketing IBM wasted by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    OS/2 runs ATM machines?

    In an age of worms and malicious programs, you never hear of ATM's getting hacked.

    Too bad IBM did not try and market OS/2 as the secure OS. Then again, once you throw services on any OS, they all become equally vulnerable. Put a web server and database on Linux, hook it up, broadcast, and it can be hacked. Just like windows.

    Then again, I bet it is a stripped down version of OS/2 that runs ATM's. There is no need for a full OS. What will people do? Play a game of solitare at the ATM? Email someone?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly don't understand the definition of OS. Solitare is not part of the windows OS, it's a piece of bundled software. The OS is just the kernel and core programs needed by the system.

    2. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      What's this about ATM's not getting hacked?

    3. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OS/2 was out at least a year before Windows 95, and IBM couldn't market their way out of a wet paper bag with it back then. They went with an "it's a sophisticated OS" approach using foreign language (with subtitles) commercials. They were aiming at the educated IT professionals who were probably too busy playing Wolfenstein and eating Doritoes to bother reading the subtitles... I know I was... mind you, we were using OS/2 at work anyway. What IBM should have done is what Microsoft (a marketing machine) did: use rock and roll, Rolling Stones, etc... market it to the masses. If the pointy haired boss has it at home, he'll use it at work (meaning he'll sign the cheque to have the IT department install it at work) because he knows how to use it already. When IBM screwed up that marketing campaign, it was over since M$ had a lock on OEM installs and nobody and no business had already committed to IBM's 32 bit OS/2.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OS/2 never had a chance, specifically because it came from IBM. No way in hell were the other major OEM's going to feed their biggest competitor by buying the OS from IBM.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Mozk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, most ATMs block incoming emails.

      --
      No existe.
    6. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In an age of worms and malicious programs, you never hear of ATM's getting hacked.

      Too bad these worms and malicious programs are on the public 'net, an infinite logical distance from the private nets that ATMs use.

    7. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by dryeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been running OS/2 for 10 yrs. So far I've had one virus, a boot sector virus that showed up in DOS sessions where it was pretty harmless and a fdisk /newmbr got rid of. Look at places like Secunia for security adviseries for OS/2 and you find one or two for Apache. In all these years I've installed one security update (PPP stack for a ping of death).
      IBM created a fairly secure OS, I'd imagine the fact that it ran so many banks etc would of made it a target.
      No services running by default. Horribly buggy sendmail thats too hard to configure to use. Straight netbios so home network is not routable.
      And I still find it much better then Windows and much simpler then Linux. I just wish that Linux would copy the WorkPlace shell instead of MSes copy of the WPS.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      A year before Win95? LOL

      I was on the Beta team back in 88/89... I guess your parents were still virgins back then....

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    9. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by mingot · · Score: 1

      My guess is that he was talking about version 3, which was out just about a year before 95 came out. And was also the one where IBM put a little bit of effort into marketing. If I remember from the commercials it was the "crash proof internet ready totally cool way to run your computer."

    10. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

      I bought OS/2 Warp.
      Never could get it to run on my machine though.
      The keyboard driver would cause the thing to lock up.

      IBM eventually came out with a replacement keyboard driver but by then Windoze 95 was out and the nail was in OS/2's perverbial coffin.

      Now, if IBM had shipped an OS without a buggy keyboard driver that would lock up the entire computer, well....

    11. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never had any problems with OS/2 drivers at all. I was running it on a 486SX-25mhz with 8mb of RAM with Waffle BBS answering a modem in a DOS VDM, while I ran Win3.1 apps. It was an incredible OS, and to this very day, even the latest, greatest Windows GUI is still just a fancied-up version of the original Chicago shell, which was a retarded rip-off of WPS. I have a feeling that a good many of the OS/2 users end up either going to Linux or MacOS.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    12. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      In an age of worms and malicious programs, you never hear of ATM's getting hacked


      Of course, even if ATMs were getting hacked, you wouldn't hear about it ... banks try to keep that sort of thing as quiet as possible. Otherwise people might lose their faith in them.


      But FWIW, ATMs do get "hacked", just at the hardware level. I'm told the "glue a little extra card-reader to the front of the card slot" gag works pretty well...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    13. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by dknj · · Score: 1

      What major OEMs? It was very open when OS/2 Warp and Win95 were getting ready to come out. If Warp had better network support and a better ad campaign, it would have blew Windows away for a short period of time. The main problem was IBM focused soley on business desktops and (once again) ignored the home market.

    14. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Informative

      I never had any problems with OS/2 drivers at all. I was running it on a 486SX-25mhz with 8mb of RAM with Waffle BBS answering a modem in a DOS VDM, while I ran Win3.1 apps. It was an incredible OS, and to this very day, even the latest, greatest Windows GUI is still just a fancied-up version of the original Chicago shell, which was a retarded rip-off of WPS. I have a feeling that a good many of the OS/2 users end up either going to Linux or MacOS

      My only real beef with OS/2 was the fact that it ran rather like a dog on 4megs of ram, and the cost to upgrade to 8megs was rather high. I gave it a good honest shot when I upgraded to 8 but at the time I was running mostly dos apps.. so I could either run OS/2 which took up a good deal of HD space and ram, or desqview which took up about 2megs of disk space and squat in the way of ram. By the time the pentiums came out and memory prices dropped to a point something like os/2 was practical and spiffy win95 was already out.

      I'm not saying I didn't like the product, it was just too much for what I needed at the time, which was running a dos app and word once and a while and terminal emulation which at the time worked so much better in a dos window.

      What I didn't like were those OS2 prophets. Nothing worse walking down the street and getting one of those jackasses with the "end is neigh" signs trying to convert me to OS2, when I was perfectly happy putting along in dos and desqview.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    15. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by jonom · · Score: 1
      I really miss OS/2.


      The workplace shell was fantastic. Voice built in at an object level - over 10 years ago! I remember driving my old 486 by voice...it was so easy to not use a mouse or keyboard. I only had 8 meg o' ram at the time - not enough for dictation, but the voice control worked great!


      And it ran Windows very nicely. :)

    16. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by XO · · Score: 1

      umm.. OS/2 was out long long LONG before Win '95. 32-bit OS/2 was out at least a good 4-5 years before Win '95. Windows 3.1 was hot when 32-bit OS/2 came out.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    17. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by XO · · Score: 1

      If you turned off the Workplace shell, and replaced it with something real small like a program called Filebar, OS/2 was fantastic on 4MB machines. Even ran on 2MB machines.

      I know, because I used to run my BBS on my 486sx/33, while playing Descent.. and downloading, using the second modem with Telemate.

      With 4MB RAM. And Descent required 8MB to run in straight DOS. Let alone running a DOS BBS and a DOS terminal program in seperate sessions. Simultaneously. And with Descent STILL running faster than it did in straight DOS.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    18. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by fataugie · · Score: 1
      --

      WTF? Over?

    19. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, get off your soap box.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    20. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by weg · · Score: 1

      Actually, in Austria and Germany there was a company called Vobis who sold computers with OS/2 off the shelf. Lateron, they sold computers with Alpha processors running Windows NT. They were also the first company who shipped computers with Star Office instead of Microsoft Office. Alas, they went bankrupt as far as I remember, which is really a pity. I'm pretty sure they would have been the first ones to ship computers exclusively with Linux.

      --
      Georg
    21. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Vario · · Score: 1

      There were at least two companies in Germany that sold their computers with OS/2 preinstalled. Vobis and Comtech came to my mind. They were trying to get away from putting Windows on every single machine. Both chains were quite large with hundreds of shops around the country.
      Vobis is still around today and doing pretty well. Comtech went bankrupt but was bought be another company and is still in business today. Unfortunately both are not experimenting anymore, you can buy the usual HP, Acer, Sony notebooks, an ipod or their own brandname computer there with WinXP.

    22. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Angostura · · Score: 1

      The problems were a bit more complex than that. The initial marketing and product roaddmap of OS/2 was a real mess. OS/2 1.0 shipped at the end of 87 but didn't have a GUI. That arrived about a year later with version 1.1 seem to recall. Both 1.0 and 1.1 came in standard and 'extended' editions - can't for the life of me remember what the extended edition added - networking stuff, I think.

      So far, so complex. But add into that mix, the fact that OS/2 was originally announced with the PS/2 featuring the funky new micro channel bus architecture. (which came in 2 versions too). The trade press took about a month to figure out whether of not OS/2 needed microchannel - IBM weren't to keen on making that clear.

      Then in 1994 was the Big OS/2 Warp (version 3) launch - a better Windows than Windows etc etc. There were many aspects of it that were really nice - it was solid, it had great pre-empitve multitasking. The GUI was extremely nice too... nearly, unfortunately lots of the user interaction wasn't sufficiently polished to be pleasant to use. I also seem to recall battling with drivers etc.

      Users just weren't going to like it enough. And they didn't.

    23. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      OMG Desqview was the bomb. I unfortunately had to return from OS2 to DOS/win3.1 because I didn't have a harddrive that could support OS/2 AND DOS, because for some odd reason I could never get my dad's accounting program to work in OS/2. No idea why, some crazy setting with the DOS support I never figured out.

      When I finally pieced together my own machine with OS/2 2.1 and Lan Manager (PreWarp), I was a happy camper, running my 3 node VirtualBBS in DOS boxes, attempting to set up CircleMUD OS/2. Never did get the PPP dialup working properly, and got a significant amount of OS/2 dev experience with Watcom C++ 10 (How's that for being a dork. Watcom 10 for a graduation present, Lan Manager for Christmas.) Doh! It all went to shit when I fucked up my OS2.ini and couldn't fix it... so I switched to Yggdrasil 1.0 that came in the back of the book "The Linux Superbible". I think I still have that CD around somewhere...

      Oh the good old days... I'm hoping PM ends up in the IBM OSS regime. We shall see...

    24. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Oh, BTW. Spacetec the company that used to make the Spaceball (no idea what they're called now) made a game controller called the Avenger. It was a 6degrees of freedom ball controller. Was absolutely amazing playing Descent. I'd routinely slaughter anyone stuck on keyboard/mouse simply because I could spin and move circles around them simply by applying pressure....

      http://www.3dgamers.com/articles/more/37/

      Too bad the calibration button on mine is stuck, and I haven't fixed it... that, and I stopped playing Descent years ago... not so good for Battlefield 2.

    25. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      "even the latest, greatest Windows GUI is still just a fancied-up version of the original Chicago shell, which was a retarded rip-off of WPS."

      Considerably retarded. The extended attributes were amazing in the WPS. You could make some pretty awesome templates out of stuff. I cobbled together a (very) simple PIM using just WPS objects! ...and shadows that would track the original file...!

      And here we are, stuck with .pif err I mean .lnk files.

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    26. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the $60 per MEGAbyte memory cost doomed OS/2 out of the gate... :-/

    27. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Actually, it was 3 years. OS/2 2.0 came out in 1992. 3 years with no competion and it STILL lost to Microsoft! IBM's marketing stunk!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    28. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by smchris · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I'm having a nasty time with kernel 2.6.X linux and udev at the moment (rant a few topics back) but, in general, I would say many linuxes are much easier to set up than OS/2. The install process was about as friendly as a Debian Woody (albeit with graphics). And a bunch of driver issues. AFAIK they never got rid of the blue tint on the WinTV driver and the zombies caused by sound clashes when you were multitasking stuff like streaming music and accidently caused another sound request could be nasty. And no file system/admin security, right?

      Nonetheless, it was a beautiful OS for its time in comparison to the Win9Xes. Another vote here for anyone resurrecting the Workplace Shell -- particularly augmented with Object Desktop.

      Why it never took off:

      1. IBM wasn't selling to the home market. Probably smart. As I say, it wasn't a pretty install and, argue all you want about how well Quake ran, it didn't run Active X games or even do sound for DOS games like Doom beyond the arcade beeps.

      2. IBM marketed stupidly. Dvorak ranted on a billboard at an airport he saw that promised "OS/2 will obliterate your hard drive!" What was that supposed to mean? They marketed a version of "Warp _FOR_ (emphasis mine) Windows". What did that mean -- OS/2 was an add-on like Microsoft Bob?

      3. When Windows 3.1 was coming out it promised to run OK on 4 meg of RAM. OS/2 needed 8 meg to run decently. At that moment, Ronald Reagan decided to teach the Japanese a thing or two about dumping RAM and nearly doubled ram prices.

      4. Microsoft was found guilty of monopolistically intimidating PC distributors from providing OS alternatives.

      Some of the blame IBM, some MS, some other factors.

    29. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by afidel · · Score: 1

      HP, Compaq, Dell, Gateway, Toshiba. Those five account for over 2/3rds of the PC market. None of them was going to hand their rival a large revenue stream if it could be avoided.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    30. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Foolomon · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      We tried to tell IBM's Marketing Team the same thing when I worked there in 1990 and I was fired as a result of pissing them off one too many times. (You don't think that calling marketing folks idiots has any effect on their temperment, do you? :D)

      Every IBM'er involved with the technical aspects of OS/2 knew what you said in your post, but the ones that controlled the marketing budget were clueless.

    31. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      What was OS/2 Warp, then? The desktop environment that was "nicer" than Win95 has gotten lots of attention here-- when did that come out?

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    32. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OS/2 was out for EIGHT YEARS before Windows 95. The 32-bit OS/2 was out THREE years before Windows 95 and a year before Windows NT 3.1. OS/2 Warp version 3 (which you are probably thinking of) was out a year before Windows 95.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    33. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by operagost · · Score: 1
      Your single ancedote about the OS/2 keyboard driver has convinced me that the years I spent running OS/2 were a hallucination.

      Of course, no one EVER had trouble installing Windows 95!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Warp" was OS/2 version 3.0. I don't remember when it came out, but I'm pretty sure it was BEFORE W95.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    35. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I tried to get OS/2 running on three separate systems.

      On one, the hard disk driver didn't work.

      On the second, the video driver didn't work, so you were stuck at 640x480.

      On the third, it wouldn't boot.

      So the company I was working for gave up on OS/2. And now I work for IBM...

      OS/2's problem wasn't marketing. The problem was that it wouldn't run on the diverse array of hardware around. It was probably great if you had IBM PCs, but who did?

      Microsoft spends a lot of money getting Windows to run on all the hardware out there. Even if Apple wanted to make OS X run on any PC, they probably couldn't afford to.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    36. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by operagost · · Score: 1

      The actual quote was "OS/2 obliterates the software I'm running right now."

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    37. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by operagost · · Score: 1
      At that moment, Ronald Reagan decided to teach the Japanese a thing or two about dumping RAM and nearly doubled ram prices.
      Wait a minute ... what year was this? Ronald Reagan left office in 1989. OS/2 was in version 1.2 at that time and Windows in 2.0.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    38. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by tmasssey · · Score: 1
      Today, sure. In 1994 (OS/2's best year) those companies were *very* different. Remember: Packard Bell was a major computer distributer then! Dell was *not* the juggernaut they are now: they were a cookie cutter clone maker just like everyone else.

      Remember Computer Shopper magazine? Not what it is today, but 2 inches of 9x12 newsprint pages *filled* with computer distributor advertisments? *THAT* was the environment in which OS/2 was best positioned to succeed.

    39. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We were installing OS/2 on Point of sale systems running a DOS POS system. The only problem we ever had was with some of the cash drawers (which were operated via a T connector from the keyboard port). We installed, oh I'd say about twenty copies of OS/2, two of those being notebooks. We were using NE2000 clones for the LAN, had all sorts of video cards, modems, some installations on Compaqs, on IBMs and from an outfit that assembled PCs in Vancouver. I never recall any failed installs of any kind.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    40. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by llefler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of us ran BBSs under OS/2. If you wanted to run multi node or do other things with your machine, it was the only thing that got the job done. Beat the hell out of Desqview. Had to suffer through that for a few years as well, learned pretty quick how to change my code to do fast DV screen writes without bleeding through. Loved using SIO for COM drivers and redirecting my BBS to telnet. I wish that trend would have taken off instead of Web boards.

      And for my part, already went Linux. Although I have to keep Win machines too. Tried Mac (mini), found the OS annoying. At least I finally got a PPC, even if OS/2 didn't survive to support it.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    41. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Cromac · · Score: 1
      I can't vouch for the accuracy, but here's an OS/2 timeline:

      http://pages.prodigy.net/michaln/history/timeline. html

      OS/2 Warp 3.0 October 1994
      OS/2 Warp Connect May 1995
      OS/2 Warp 4.0 September 1996

    42. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shh, don't confuse the Republican bashers with the facts.

    43. Re:Think of the marketing IBM wasted by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      If you turned off the Workplace shell, and replaced it with something real small like a program called Filebar, OS/2 was fantastic on 4MB machines. Even ran on 2MB machines

      If I knew about that then I might have actually used OS/2. Unfortunatly my evaluation was based entirely of the product out the box without any software tweeking, and to get it to run efficently required about $300 extra in ram, something I wasn't willing to invest in at the time. Few people were.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  45. Q: Why kill OS/2? A: Support Costs. by Losat · · Score: 1

    If you sell it, you must support it.
    Supporting an operating system can be very expensive. Consider all the device drivers and such.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on Slashdot.
  46. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by cheese_lord · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the love of god it's ATM not ATM machine. No one goes to the Automatic Teller Machine Machine

  47. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  48. Don't bother, not gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see subject for details.

  49. Correction by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

    OS/2 is big in banking.

    I have not ever worked on OS/2 ever, I have worked in the banking IT for some 6 yrs now. Though I understand the complexity of the systems and difficulties in moving on to new/better/different technologies, its difficult to understand their total refusal to move out of OS/2 world.

    So, at least this should prompt them to think about something new.

    Lesson: Do it missionary style if you get a chance, or somebody will do it to you in doggy style.

    1. Re:Correction by jjp5421 · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for Y2k banks would all still be using green screens (wait some still are)...

  50. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last time I checked, large numbers of ATM machines ran OS2, which is why you don't see the BSOD when you go to grab some cash.

    And i'm sure they'll still be running OS/2 even after IBM stops selling it.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  51. 'Tis The Season by Eradicator2k3 · · Score: 0

    It said that all sales of OS/2 will end on the 23rd of December this year

    Rats! There goes my holiday season although I suppose I could buy some copies on the 22nd as "presents" for the less desirable people on my gift list.

    --
    Mr. T pitied this fool on 27 July 1992.
  52. Phone Systems by LordBodak · · Score: 1

    A lot of corporate phone systems run on OS/2, but other than that I don't know of anyplace it's in use still.

    --
    LordBodak's journal.
    1. Re:Phone Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Italy all the desktop terminals of Trenitalia (the national train company) work with OS/2.
      It will take a lot of time to upgrade the whole thing, i guess :)

  53. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Guy+Harris · · Score: 5, Funny
    I entered my PIN number into an ATM machine

    Did the ATM machine run Windows 2000, which is built on Windows NT technology?

    I know, I should STFU up...

    Only if you're posting over a DSL line.

  54. I wonder what will happen to some things.... by tu_holmes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What will happen to some mainframes and tape libraries?

    OS/2 is still the predominant OS for managing MVS systems (even the new Z series) as well as tape libraries.

    Will they be migrating all current environments into Linux as part of this? Or will they just leave those alone?

    I wonder...

    1. Re:I wonder what will happen to some things.... by Shag · · Score: 1
      OS/2 is still the predominant OS for managing MVS systems (even the new Z series)
      So... uh... "anything with a decent 3270 emulator" isn't the answer any more? My, how things have changed since I played with that 9377. I mean, what's not to like about a mainframe with 16MB of main RAM? ;)
      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    2. Re:I wonder what will happen to some things.... by rah1420 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, the parent is talking about the processor that handles the IPL chores in the sysplex.

      Plus the silos probably all have their own dedicated systems.

      The fact that they have 3270 emulation would be rather insignificant if VTAM isn't started yet, methinks.

      I'll check with our systems guys, not sure what's gonna happen now.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    3. Re:I wonder what will happen to some things.... by MaccaUK · · Score: 1
      New HMCs these days run ... Linux :-) Even for the big pSeries boxes.

      There are still a lot of installed OS/2 HMCs though, so I suppose there'll be either

      1. a lot of customers paying for support or
      2. a lot of customers paying to migrate the HMCs.
    4. Re:I wonder what will happen to some things.... by tu_holmes · · Score: 1

      I had no idea... I know the newest HMC that was installed here is running OS/2 and it was only installed about a month ago.

      Of course, our MVS folks could have "requested" that... Ya' never know.

  55. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the love of god it's ATM not ATM machine. No one goes to the Automatic Teller Machine Machine

    Anybody with a PIN number goes to an ATM machine.

  56. M$ by JeiFuRi · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is an OShole (haha my boston accent comes in handy now) for ruining OS/2.

    1. Re:M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you, since I have been involved in OS/2 at IBM, that IBM did a better job themselves than Microsoft to kill OS/2.

      But ofcourse such comments are not valid on Slashdot.

  57. os/2 is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they never saw it coming!

  58. Once upon a time.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time I had to use OS/2 to perform weekly maintenance on the cc:mail post offices the company used.

    The maintenance program ran on both DOS and OS/2 but once the post office reached a size limit, OS/2 had to be used becuase the DOS version of the maintenance program would hose things. ( a pointer would roll over to 0 in the middle of the pack operation, truncating the post office at that point..)

  59. I still encounter OS/2 by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I haven't used OS/2 myself, but the *nix software I've created over the years has run on OS/2 after some simple patches (mostly just #define's in the C code). So maybe it's not too difficult a transition from OS/2 to some *nix, such as Linux (why specifically Linux I don't know... BSDs might be more appropriate for industrial use in my opinion). I know that OS/2 is used in banking. It is of course a very reliable platform, but I also have colleagues who very much enjoy using OS/2 regularly. There seem to be more OS/2 fans out there than say BeOS fans

  60. get eComStation instead by user_ecs · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you liked OS/2 you will find eComStation is better.
    eComStation is more stable than ms win while being easy to use.
    http://www.ecomstation.com/

    1. Re:get eComStation instead by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Funny

      It has drive letters. ewww!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:get eComStation instead by user_ecs · · Score: 1

      It natively uses LVM (Logical Volume Manager) Also has JFS (a file system) eComStation, ms win and Linux can co-exist on the same hard drive

    3. Re:get eComStation instead by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Well I have f:\usr, g:\usr, and I:\usr all symlinked to x:\usr with varying orders (via scripts) which one will come first in the search order. Try symlinking 2 directories to one in Linux and vary which comes first in the search order

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:get eComStation instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... you don't know which drive x:\usr is at any given time?

      Wow! That seems like an incredibly useful thing to do that I have wanted many, many times over the years.

      To think I wasted all that time trying to know exactly what was stored where. I could have been using OS/2, and been using a system where that was simply not possible. Think of the increase in productivity!

    5. Re:get eComStation instead by Lucid+Interval · · Score: 0

      Linux has drive letters too. In fact, it has three times as many.

  61. That doesn't look like an ATM to me by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    it looks like that think is a video phone. There is a camera, handset, and a bill slot that takes bills rather than giving them to you.

  62. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by vought · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Last time I checked, large numbers of ATM machines ran OS2, which is why you don't see the BSOD when you go to grab some cash.


    Er, and they'll keep running exactly as they are doing today until 2045, when BoFA finally replaces the "Watch an ad while we fleece you because you are self employed and have no direct deposit" terminals.

    Anyone else use BofA? I personally enjoy having to select Espanol or English every time I use a terminal...even though I've been an English-only customer since 1990 or so.

    Thanks, BofA, for making my life easier!

  63. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

    I go to an Automatic Teller Machine Machine and enter my Personal Identification Number Number at least 3 times a wekk!

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  64. OS/2? by Approaching.sanity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I read about it. Once. Ever. I may be part of the new computing generation.

    Maybe.

    --
    RTFA again for the best results.
    1. Re:OS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice troll. You clearly are. Look to Macintel for a possible repeat performance of OS/2's "better windows than windows" albatros.

    2. Re:OS/2? by chez69 · · Score: 1

      my favorite was oh shit/2 references on usenet

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
  65. Kills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With what, a friggin' press release?

    Say what you will about Apple, but they sure do know how to kill an OS with panache.

  66. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny
    For the love of god it's ATM not ATM machine. No one goes to the Automatic Teller Machine Machine

    Well, obviously the ATM machine is the machine which dispenses the ATMs.

  67. You Laugh but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm using an OS/2 right now to write this message at work which happens to be at IBM. Luckly this machine has a Java Citrix client to connect to a Windows desktop so I can do some work in OS/2...sort of.

  68. Taps... by VectorSC · · Score: 1

    I hear taps playing now. Whup....Here comes the 21 Gun Salute. Where is everyone else, though? This funeral is mighty sparse. The only other person here is Bill Gates....pointing...and laughing evilly. Hrm.

  69. Using eComStation 1.2, next year 2.0 by user_ecs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure am using it. eComStation 1.2 http://www.ecomstation.com/ Firefox NVU Samba OpenOffice REXX Java 1.4

  70. Open the Workplace Shell by PingXao · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will they finally open the Workplace Shell? It's a truly object-oriented desktop design that's still superior - a decade later - to anything Windows has to offer. Looking back it's hard to believe a lot of the early FUD from MS against OS/2 was aimed at scaring people away because, hey, 2 megabytes of memory was just an absurd requiremet! They also claimed multithreaded programming was no big deal. If they open up the Workplace Shell maybe OS/2 could preserve some of its legacy. It would rock on Linux.

    1. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Losat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hear hear! I love the WPS!
      It's been so long since I used OS/2 that I'd forgotten about dragging colors and fonts from the palettes and such, until I went and checked out eComStation a few moments ago. I remembered that WPS rocked, but I'd forgottem some of the coolness.
      BTW, I liked the old settings notebooks better than the later tabbed dialogs. I especially liked notebooks with both horizonatal and vertical tabs (when appropriate).
      And my favorite UI feature missing in other systems: the Conditional Cascade Menu!

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on Slashdot.
    2. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by slamb · · Score: 1
      [The Workplace Shell] is a truly object-oriented desktop design that's still superior - a decade later - to anything Windows has to offer.

      What does this even mean? Object-oriented is a programming model. Are you talking about their implementation? Because as a user, I don't care about that. I can think of very few useful extensions to desktop interfaces - Tortoise(CVS|SVN) comes to mind. I can't even think of a #2. Thus, with no reason to interact with their code, I don't care what model it uses. If you had the ability to extend the desktop in any way, what would you do with it?

      If you're not talking about the implementation, how does an "object-oriented" desktop behave differently?

      I hear this every time OS/2 is mentioned, but I used the Workplace Shell and wasn't impressed. My memory is hazy, but I think there was some really stupid stuff - you had to select icons with the left mouse button then drag them with the right, or something. Awkward and counterintuitive.

    3. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by dryeo · · Score: 1

      This is why I still use OS/2. Windows is like a pale imitation of OS/2 (with prettier icons and stuff) and most of the Linux desktops about the same. And now someone is adding a bunch of WPS enhancements to Mozilla and family, nice

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      >I hear this every time OS/2 is mentioned, but I used the Workplace Shell and wasn't impressed. My memory is hazy, but I think there was some really stupid stuff - you had to select icons with the left mouse button then drag them with the right, or something. Awkward and counterintuitive.

      Funny you should mention that.

      For me that is the best feature ever and any desktop not supporting it will totally suck in comparison to the point I mostly don't use the gui file managers or any drag and drop.

      (one reason I'm not getting a Mac any time soon).

      The above binding has two major advantages: very easy selection of multiple icons and the fact that you cannot accidentaly perform a drag and drop by double clicking with the left button which happens sometimes in Windows (usually in the tree view and creates a big mess when the admin is browsing the windows or program_files directory.

    5. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by jbolden · · Score: 3, Informative

      What does this even mean?

      Inheritance. In windows (or Linux) a file is an extension and is associated with an application or collection of applications. In OS/2 a file can inherit from various parents. So for example you could have a file xyz.mp3 of a lecture:

      1) Since its an .mp3 the sound programs work on it and "edit" opens it up in a sound editor

      2) Since its part of a lecture it will inherit from the word transcript and when you "open for transcription" it opens with another (say word doc) transcript

      3) Since the lecture an be associated with other lectures which have video with them when you "open for viewing" it can pull up the associated powerpoint

      etc...

      Now the important thing is that these behaviors are inherited because the xyz.mp3 is a member of class lecture in addition to being a member of the class .mp3. Members of the class .mp3 are sound files while members of the class lecture have associated transcripts and lectures.

      It also made some attempt at polymorphic behavior (i.e. edit, open, etc..).
      Finally information was encapsulated at the lowest level (the file, the folder, etc..)

    6. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by mingot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Uh, it meant you had this thing called a 'font pallete' that had some fonts. And you could drop them RIGHT ONTO APPLICATIONS and it would change fonts and whatnot. Some applications were even programmed to PERSIST THE FONT CHANGE ACROSS PROGRAM LOADS! *VERY* Cool stuff, that WPS was.

      Really. If you don't understand how that made OS/2 cool as shit and better than windows you can go fuck yourself.

    7. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's been a long time, but if I remember correctly what I think people might mean when thay say, "OS/2 has an object-oriented desktop" is that the interface was heavily based on icon manipulation for common shell tasks, and it didn't have a "Program Manager" or "Start Menu." While it doesn't sound like much, it fundamentally changes the way you work with your system.

      Everything was done with folders on the desktop. Sure you'd have your applications folder, but the WPS is so complete, it lends itself more towards working with your files in the shell. This is accomplished with strong file associations and aliases/shortcuts/(sym)links. Your desktop is the file-manager. You could for instance, have your desktop set to a tree-view of your file system. The general idea was to go to a folder then double-click to open a file or drag in a "template" to create a new one. I guess what people really mean is, "OS/2 has an object-centric desktop." As opposed to the application-centric approach of Windows; first with the Program Manager, then with the Start Menu. Compare:

      OS/2: Navigate to Folder -> Open File/Template
      Windows: Start Application -> New/Open File

      I'd put Mac OS somewhere between the two. OS/2 shadows are similar to Mac OS aliases in so far they are aware of their target. Deleteing either the original object or the shadow presents the option to delete the other(s). IIRC, shadows also reflected the state of the target (open folder/file/application). Also like classic Mac OS (and now GNOME), all windows are stateful, storing size, location, and a whole host of window properties. Minimized windows can be overlaid on the desktop, placed in a window, both, or neither and simply re-opened from their original location. Duplicate views of a folder only ever occured if you did single-window navigation. The interface follows well-established design principles and the Open Source community would benefit from its study.

      Which brings me to what got me started on this post in the first place:

      ...you had to select icons with the left mouse button then drag them with the right, or something. Awkward and counterintuitive.
      IMHO, I'd call it well-reasoned and functional. Just because it's not the way Windows works doesn't make it wrong. In Windows, a primary mouse button click-drag can be either a move operation or a selection operation, dependent upon where you begin the gesture. In OS/2, primary button click-drag is a selection every time. Consistency is the primary tenet of GUI design. I wouldn't be surprised if Mac OS would have done this too if Mr. Jobs allowed the use of more than one mouse button.

      Even still, I'm pretty sure you could change the settings to your preference.

    8. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by zsau · · Score: 1

      What's the Conditional Cascade Menu?

      I've played with OS/2 a bit, and I must say I did like it, but when I was able to give it a shot, there was no real decent web browsers for it. Without a web browser, I wasn't able to give it the chance it deserved. (Very little software besides is important to me if I want to give an OS a shot besides a web browser, a text editor, and a half decent UI.)

      --
      Look out!
    9. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true!

      Afaik, as a former Os/2 user circa 1994-1996, IBM's Workplace Shell (not presentation manager from Os/2 1.x) was a true object oriented desktop shell (like NeXT supposedly was, this I never got my hands on).

      It was not just what I consider the Explorer.exe shell to be (original NT 4.x or 9x ones prior to IE integration, or afterwards with IE in the desktop shell)...

      An object request broker.

      I know it ran pretty well on 16mb - 32mb 486 Dx/4 133mhz machines as well/no less.

      You could do many things that weren't possible on Windows 3.x (that's for sure) like play video and also format a diskette, print a document, & other things in your apps ALL @ ONCE/concurrently/simultaneously.

      Multithreaded Programming, believe it or not, HAS an actual "downside" on single-cpu boxes:

      Code that is multithreaded is actually SLOWER on single CPU systems!

      (IIRC, because of threadcreation expense & also because it is geared to run potentially on the least used CPU via OS process schedulers of today in modern OS like Linux &/or NT-based Os')

      So, on single CPU systems vs. HyperThreaded ones, true physical dual or more SMP cpu ones, or Dual Core CPU's, multithreaded code runs slower.

      However, put it onto an OS with a modern process/thread scheduler that is SMP ready? Multithreaded code, in theory & quite often in practice, runs "faster" because it can break itself off into discrete portions (smallest atomic unit of execution being threads/fibers vs. Processes) which the OS scheduler can direct to other CPU's, provided the operation isn't blocking & lends itself to diff. data sets & isn't dependent on one operation finishing, before another can begin!

      E.G. of code that doesn't lend itself well to multiple threads:

      A = B + C

      D = A + E

      (Where "D" has to wait for the result of A to finish up... no point in assigning these to independent threads, because "D" will always be blocked by the wait-time on the arrival of the results of A to occur first!)

      HOWEVER - something that works on completely diff. data, such as printing one page of a spreadsheet on a single thread, while reformatting another page of a spreadsheet (provided it has no dependencies on the first page's data calculating out etc. first on this second sheet) is one that might be a good idea to put into separate threads.

      BUT, this really only works well on systems with SMP, HyperThreading, or DualCore setups WITH a process scheduling system that can redirect portions of code via threads to least used CPU's if one of the cpu's is saturated... afaik.

      APK

      P.S.=> There is "upsides" to threads and it's on HyperThreaded, DualCore, or TRUE "SMP" setup systems with multiple actual physical CPU's present & a time where benefit occurs on them, & to use them in various, non-blocking operations as I note above.

      There is "downsides" to threads also, & a time NOT to use them (single cpu setups don't really get a benefit from multithreaded apps & especially on TRUE single cpu setups, non-H/T type cpu's), such as the 'blocking' type operation I noted using the results of A as being the 'stumbling block' above, where an op like that wouldn't lend itself well to multithreaded operation... apk

    10. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm cloaked, obviously for a reason. I've suggested several times that IBM open up the WPS, and it has basically gone "thud!" every time.

      There's a piece of basic IBM psychology at work here: IBM has a tendancy to field advanced technologies before their time. That technology then "fails" in the marketplace, and subsequently acquires a degree of hatred and loathing within IBM. Then when the technology truly comes of age, IBM drags its feet, sacrificing its early lead, and in fact, generally has to buy it back from outside, because it has waited so long for re-adoption. (I seriously doubt this is any secret to any IBM-watcher, having seen it obviously and visibly in action several times.)

      Some good technologies like the WPS will probably die completely, because the market never adopted, only IBM could push or allow, and IBM is letting the them rot. Incidentally, there's a WPS-lookalike called DFM http://www.kaisersite.de/dfm/ that has been languishing since 2001, but even it was a superficial appearance-only thing. Gnome appeared to have many of the underpinnings right, but went off chasing Windows, instead of trying to be better.

    11. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Counter-intuitive?

      Don't you really mean, "not like Windows." As others have said, it's just a convention, and once you adapted to it, it really worked well, and was less ambiguous than Windows.

      Or, for a favorite quote: "The only truly intuitive user interface is the nipple. All else is learned." I still remember my daughter "learning" to eat cereal from a spoon. Her tongue still worked in nipple-mode, pushing food out of her mouth as she tried to eat it. Her stop-gap invention was to use her foot. We put the food in her mouth, she stuck her toes in her mouth, and sucked. The food got in, and her hunger taken care of. Eventually, she learned to do it without the toes.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    12. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Politburo · · Score: 1

      While that's certainly a unique way of doing things, it doesn't sound like it's worth the effort to me. From your description, it sounds like there's a lot to keep track of. It's an mp3, it's a lecture, it's in a group of lectures. You can open to edit, open to transcribe, open to view.. Is all of this association done automatically? You indicate that some of the context comes from the file extension, but how does the system know it's a 'lecture'?

    13. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      Explanation of conditional cascading menus.

      There is also a request in GNOME bugzilla to implement this in GTK+.

    14. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Its carried in the metadata. So you could options:

      1) If the lectures were produced by someone who used OS/2 then maybe the CDROM you got them with (that also had the transcripts and powerpoints) would have had this metadata. Similarly for a download the metadata could have been carried in the .zip file or whatever

      2) When you copied the files you might have marked the CDROM. Of course you would have already have had to have set up this structure.

      3) When you copied the files you put them in a folder which was only for lectures. Then the folder is marked not the files.

      4) I'm sure there are other options

      Aa for being worth the effort I'll give you an example where I actually used it. I had a 14" interlaced monitor which I typically ran at 800x600 so it was a little hard on the eyes but I had some screen real estate to work with. My folders were color coded by type of thing they had. For .txt file collections reading had two different default behaviors
      a) If the folder was pink it opened up in a full screen ansi based text editor (very easy on the eyes for extended computer reading)
      b) If the folder was any other color it opened up in a standard windowish text editor (good for integration with the rest of the system).

      I did a lot of computer based reading then and pink was my reading color. I could quickly identify folders with stuff to read and the behavior was what I wanted and it took like 5 minutes to set this all up the first time and maybe another 5 minutes per month as files came on and off.

    15. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Obviously NOT a programmer..

      For COMPUTE intensive operations, threading on a single CPU is usually pointless. For IO bound applications (most everything a user interacts with), multithreading allows your system to be responsive to users. Every 32bit version of Windows since NT 3.0 (including 95) were HEAVILY multithreaded. SMP or not, while threading does introduce overhead, the result is a lot better than working in Lotus in DOS all day.

    16. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by mrmazda · · Score: 1

      I'm running SeaMonkey and Deer Park Alpha 2 on it.

    17. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. I wrote a lot of the code to fix the WPS.
      A basic problem was that the object hierarchy was based on where the persistent data lived. File system, INI file, or nowhere (transient). And how do you handle a dozen different plugins that want to handle an objects events?
      It was a good first stab, but WPS 3.0 (the PPC version) should have concentrated on how to deal with these concerns, but had to deal with the Mach kernel instead (64 MB to boot!?!? A travesty!)

      Rick DeBay

    18. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by zsau · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... There'd been decent browsers for OS/2 before I could use it, but they were no longer current so lacked needed features. Now I can't use it (hardware issues + my install CD* is both scratched and lost -sigh-), I'm sure there's decent browsers now. Just at the time. Didn't mean to imply otherwise!

      * A few years ago Australian Personal Computer had a copy of the few-years-old OS/2 Warp 4, which is what I used.

      --
      Look out!
    19. Re:Open the Workplace Shell by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      As opposed to the application-centric approach of Windows; first with the Program Manager, then with the Start Menu. Compare:

      OS/2: Navigate to Folder -> Open File/Template Windows: Start Application -> New/Open File

      This is how lots of people do it, but it is not, in fact, how the Windows 95 interface was *supposed* to be used. It was _supposed_ to be like the OS/2 GUI - you would navigate to some folder then right click -> New -> "Object".

  71. Can move to Linux [was Re:OS2 is still in use?] by ciurana · · Score: 1

    Tim,

    You may want to take a look at MontaVista's real-time Linux offerings (http://www.mvista.com./ I was the technical lead for a real-time Java controller core that ran atop Hard Hat Linux and implemented both BACNet and Profibus (via Applicom dedicated I/O cards) for building automation and industrial robots, respectively.

    I sold the rights to the software to the oil drilling equipment company that implemented the industrial robots but I'll be happy to assist if you want to discuss. You can find me as pr3d4t0r in irc.freenode.net ##java or chupacabra in Undernet #java.

    Here is an old page describing some of the stuff that we did: http://web.archive.org/web/20010302021846/http://c ime.net/

    I'll be a speaker at the Java in Action conference in Orlando this coming October; one of the sessions will talk about recent work I made in embedded/mobile/full-automation stuff. Most of my work is now based on Linux with some OS X, Solaris, and QNX to spice things up (I now work full-time for someone else; got tired of the startup game...)

    Cheers and good luck,

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    1. Re:Can move to Linux [was Re:OS2 is still in use?] by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem.

      The body of code we wrote (routing manager and 13 protocol-specific subsystems) depend on lots of OS/2-specific features. The two that jump out quickly are named-pipes (for IPC) and direct serial port access. We did so many things that were down at that level, that don't easily move to another OS (as far as I know).

      I have done some moderate research into porting these apps, but given that many of them are UL-listed for life-safety applications, and all of them are used for real-time applications, we have not seen good options for moving the code easily.

      If I've missed some "magic bullet," a Rosetta for OS/2 apps under Linux, or something like it, I would love to know. However, we haven't found any such solution.

      I'll check out the links though. Thanks for the help.

      Tim

    2. Re:Can move to Linux [was Re:OS2 is still in use?] by mikefe · · Score: 1

      Named pipes and /dev/ttySXX are standard features on any unix OS, including Linux. Can you be more specific?

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    3. Re:Can move to Linux [was Re:OS2 is still in use?] by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      You're correct. At the time we were looking to port these apps (we've since abandoned the plan, but maybe should reconsider), Windows was the only OS candidate being proposed, largely because of UI-client issues. If I remember Gordon Letwellin's (sp?) input correctly, several of the the OS/2 core services had a strong UNIX influence, and named pipes and device access are probably at the front.

      Unfortunately, all of the OS/2 code was developed by a company which was acquired several years ago by a much larger player in the market. Given that this product competes directly with our new overlord's flagship product, it has been difficult for us to convince anyone to perform any maintenance on the code, even for known bugs.

      Your comment makes me think we need to review the possibility of porting to Linux, and ignoring the OS/2 vs Windows angle.

      Thanks,

      Tim

  72. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I entered my PIN number into an ATM machine

    Did the ATM machine run Windows 2000, which is built on Windows NT technology?

    I know, I should STFU up...

    Only if you're posting over a DSL line.


    Relating to TFA article, I think the ATM machine was running the Operating System OS/2. At least, AFAIK know.

    And this is all utter nonsense, but what do I care? I'm posting as an AC coward!

  73. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, I for one only use ATM Machines with LCD Displays.

  74. By that measure by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Amiga isn't dead yet...

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:By that measure by Renegrade · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Amiga isn't dead yet...

      Sometimes I wish it had died. The post-Commodore times were horrible - all that fighting, failed next gen machines, broken promises, missed deadlines, successor confusion.

      I still would have liked to see a AAA based system with a fully functional OS, or Phase5's design in action. Think of a GUI designed for advanced hardware overlays instead of layers...

      I wonder if a new system could be built around AMD/EMT64 .. the 16 multipurpose registers are very much like the 68K's 16 multipurpose registers... naah, too costly.

  75. Will someone else support it? by elgee · · Score: 1

    If OS/2 is still in use in a lot of places, someone else may step in to do support. It is not going to be cheap to transition to any other OS.

    I used OS/2 on my first ThinkPad in 1995 and 1996. A very stable platform.

  76. ATM Machines by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Hmmm....

    I would think that a DSL Modem might qualify as an ATM Machine (as it usually uses ATM as the primary network access protocol for communicating via DSL over copper).

    I think I have an ATM Machine on the back of my house. It multiplexes my telephone and data connections over fiber and sends it to the PUD where their ATM Switch (another ATM Machine) splits the traffic and sends it to the appropriate places.

    None of this has to do with OS/2 except that OS/2 often powers another sort of ATM...

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  77. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't think you've checked very recently. The vast majority of ATM's have been Windows based for at least 2 or 3 years.

    The big transition started happening around Y2K. They needed to upgrade the hardware in many of the systems anyways, so they took the opportunity to bail on OS/2 as well (given IBM's "don't ask, don't tell" stance on it).

  78. Was used in a lot of embedded systems by quantum+bit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our phone system's voice mail processor used to be on an OS/2 Warp 3.x box (with the GUI disabled). Thing was stable as hell, ran for years without being touched.

    When we "upgraded" the phone system, it got replaced with one that runs on NT. It came preloaded with an 'at' job to reboot it nightly...

  79. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously the ATM machine is the machine which dispenses the ATMs.

    Or ATM cells (Async. Transfer Mode). An ATM adapter card might make your PC into an ATM Machine....

    Does OS/2 support any common ATM hardware for things like DSL modems, or ATM over Fiber? I would assume so. In that case it probably powers both various ATM Machines and ATM's....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  80. What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sys?" by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

    What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating system? Is that when you multitask before the user asks you to? Maybe your threads terminate before you call kill? Maybe I'm stupid and just don't get it.

  81. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by pete6677 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You must work for the Department of Redundancy Department.

  82. This may tick some off... by suitepotato · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...and it isn't a troll. I used to support OS/2 and it sucked like an Electrolux. 2.1 and Warp 3. Some of the worst time of my professional life.

    Firstly, it had an interface that was bass ackward on a level that no sadist Motif nutcase in Hell could have conceived and which made that of the Amiga look almost sane. It set out to not be Unix, DOS, Windows, or anything else that you could use without training and regular doses of crazy pills never mind headache meds. Those of my family working the insurance companies with massive IBM entrenchment agreed.

    You want paradigm shifting without popping the clutch? I know of several companies which took people and gave them massive training just to make basic use of OS/2, threw them onto Windows 95 or NT without training, then put them back onto OS/2 until they could, in essence, deprogram their OS/2 users.

    Secondly, it was supposed to be compatible with DOS and FAT16. In practice, it could write things to a FAT16 partition across a LAN on a DOS/Win machine that could not be read by DOS/Win and caused automated back-ups to fail and require someone to spend sixteen hours watching the machine to hit buttons and tell the backup software to ignore the problem. It behaved like an infertile virus that happened to double as an OS.

    Thirdly, the ONLY place it excelled was stable multitasking of DOS windows and even it was like dealing with Dirty Harry. Was it stable with seven or eight windows before another one crashed it? Well, do you feel luck, punk?

    Like Token Ring it was stillborn and it would have been better had its authors been using intellectual protection and not conceived it in the first place, requiring this after the fact abortion. Strong wording I know, but I sacrificed sixty hours a week to that horrific demon spawn and would rather have never had to.

    Thankfully, many IBM shops saw past the folly of single-sourcing everything to IBM, saw that IBM was rapidly becoming a corporation dedicated to whatever it was no matter the amount of idiocy involved, and that IBM could not do for them on the desktop what Windows could.

    Rest In Deletion, OS/2.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:This may tick some off... by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Funny... whenever we've done end-user training and the end-users don't have a preconceived notion of what a computer OS is supposed to look like, they seem to latch on to OS/2 just fine. And yes, we had users that would wave the mouse around in the air, so much so that I (when I was working as a tech writer) created a graphic that showed that the mouse had to be in contact with the table.

      Once we got people to that level of understanding, the interface was reasonably consistent throughout.

      Not sure what your benchmark is, but as someone who used OS/2 as my day-to-day OS for several years, and have supported apps developed under this OS for several more, and spent more than a few hours writing articles for "Inside OS/2," your comments strike me as bogus.

      Tim

    2. Re:This may tick some off... by marcosdumay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Secondly, it was supposed to be compatible with DOS and FAT16. In practice, it could write things to a FAT16 partition across a LAN on a DOS/Win machine that could not be read by DOS/Win and caused automated back-ups to fail and require someone to spend sixteen hours watching the machine to hit buttons and tell the backup software to ignore the problem. It behaved like an infertile virus that happened to double as an OS."

      Blame that on Windows! You don't really think that OS2 can have raw access to the disks by lan, do you? Even if it can, double blame on Windows, because it shouldn't. Ok, you come with several non issues and a bug of Windows, a lot of reasons to hate OS2... Saying that it isn't a troll dont make it so.

    3. Re:This may tick some off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If OS/2 sends the wrong data DOS writes it correctly.
      Of course it then writes the wrong data correctly so the data is still useless to the DOS machine and may crash applications.

      That's in fact exactly what happened.

      I too used to work on OS/2 in a mixed environment, I recognise all the problems mentions.

      We too sent every user on an intensive course to be able to use OS/2, then when introducing Windows NT workstations there was no need for training at all for most of them because it's bloody intuitive.

    4. Re:This may tick some off... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      MS really did go out of their way to make OS/2 look broken and a good example was always forcing OS/2 to use 8.3 names over the network. Lots of people honestly believed this was OS/2s fault when it was really MS playing dirty. And people wonder why I hate MS

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    5. Re:This may tick some off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      omg, you really have no clue. You can't write to "Fat" across a network. You use file system sharing protocols, like SMB and AppleTalk. I implemented MANY Os/2 Lan setups, and never once seen windows write bad data due to OS/2.


      Quit your trollin'

    6. Re:This may tick some off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, many IBM shops saw past the folly of single-sourcing everything to IBM, saw that IBM was rapidly becoming a corporation dedicated to whatever it was no matter the amount of idiocy involved, and that IBM could not do for them on the desktop what Windows could.

      So they saw past the folly of single-sourcing to IBM... and chose to single-source to Microsoft instead? How visionary these companies were!

    7. Re:This may tick some off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read the whole thing and think it is bogus made up BS.

      Nathan

    8. Re:This may tick some off... by standards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like Token Ring it [OS/2] was stillborn

      You have a very limited vantage point of history. Token Ring, like OS/2, had a large install base. Token Ring died because once Ethernet was (finally) standardized with 10baseT and low-cost hubs and NICs, it was cheaper and faster and easier. But token ring had a huge install base which was only eliminated once organizations needed to upgrade their bandwidth to 100 Mbit.

    9. Re:This may tick some off... by CaptainFork · · Score: 1
      Secondly, it was supposed to be compatible with DOS and FAT16.

      See http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/firm ware/fatgen.mspx for the FAT32 spec. You will notice that the specifications for FAT are an emergent phenomonon coming from years of fire-fighting compatibility problems with third-party implementations, not something carefully thought-out then written down in advance.

    10. Re:This may tick some off... by lwriemen · · Score: 1

      I don't know how this got modded as interesting. It is obviously a troll and flamebait. I suggest people go read The Design of OS/2 by Deitel and Kogan and "The Early History of Smalltalk" by Alan Kay to get a real sense of the history of the PC. I also suggest people look at ecomstation.com to see where OS/2 is today.

    11. Re:This may tick some off... by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      a) I used OS/2 as my daily OS throughout the 1990's from OS/2 2.11 through OS/2 4.0. OS/2 4.0 is still my favorite and one of the best OS's that I have ever used. In 1997 I purchased my copy and found that OS/2 had built-in voice recognition, built-in speech/text reading, full Plug-and-Play support, a fully integrated desktop and taskbar, full remote graphical installs over a LAN, built-in 'enterprise' grade LAN support, and a host of other features.

      b) Your post brings into doubt if you even used OS/2 at all. And if you did, and your post is even somewhat true, it sounds like not only were your system adminsitrators completely incompetent but your users were as dumb as bricks. Everyone that I ever met who asked me if they could take a look at OS/2 figured out how it worked within seconds. Even people who had barely ever used a computer before.

      3) Using OS/2 for years with my university's Netware server worked flawlessly.

  83. <sob> I'm dying!!! by ricOS/2 · · Score: 1

    Oh, woe is me!

    -- ricOS/2

  84. Farewell, OS/2 by El+Cabri · · Score: 0

    We hardly knew ya.

  85. Open Source Ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need source to impliment ideas*, just a good work ethic.

    *You know? "ideas...put a taper to..."

  86. Alternatively, by CaptainPotato · · Score: 1
    one could always migrate from OS/2 to the Amiga, as it isn't officially dead, and is still being developed.

    Okay, in reality, it's more like the Monty Python parrot, but, hey, the Amiga's just really pining for the fjords and is shagged out after a long squawk....

    ;)

    --
    I heard that your library burnt down and destroyed your only two books - and one was not even coloured in yet.
    1. Re:Alternatively, by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      one could always migrate from OS/2 to the Amiga, as it isn't officially dead, and is still being developed.

      Oddly enough, you linked to "Amiga Anywhere", which is an on-top-of-Java-ME environment for software running on mobile devices, AFAIK. What it has to do with the 'classic' Amiga OS (beyond the name) has never been explained to me- I suspect because it has absolutely *nothing* to do with it, and the Amiga company simply figured that slapping that name on it would sell a few more to undemanding nostalgics. Pathetic.

      BTW, apparently AmigaOS 4.0 finally came out a few months back, although by this stage I'm not really sure what the point was.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  87. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just wait until microsoft implements their new NT technology in the ATM machines.

  88. OS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS/2? sound more like OS/who!
    ~adam sandler

  89. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by KingEomer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, we all go to the slash slash slash dot dot. :P

  90. Yeah, it's why you see a Black Screen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, it wasn't technically a BSOD, but I have seen ATMs being rebooted after they crashed...

    (Just because OS/2 was better than Windows, doesn't mean it's unbreakable!)

  91. Open the StarDock Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot about StarDock and their add-on (of which I have a copy :).

  92. Re:Q: Why kill OS/2? A: Support Costs. by Frankie70 · · Score: 1


    Supporting an operating system can be very expensive. Consider all the device drivers
    and such.


    Somebody who hasn't upgraded from OS/2 till now
    would probably have not upgraded the devices attached to his machine - so no new device drivers are needed.

  93. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

    It means that the operating system doesn't depend on applications voluntarily yielding the CPU to the operating system, like with early versions of Windows and Mac OS.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  94. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    "Anyone else use BofA? I personally enjoy having to select Espanol or English every time I use a terminal...even though I've been an English-only customer since 1990 or so."


    Since the mods seem to be OK with this off topic divergence here, I'll throw in my $.02.

    I've been with BofA for the past 10 years and have been (overall) happy with them. It took them forever and a day to get their online (web-based) banking up to snuff but when they finally did, it was equal to or better than the competition.

    As far as their ATMs asking you if you'd like to transact in English or Spanish is concerned, I can only say that they are hardly the only bank around with ATMs that ask this question.

    I have a novel idea! ;-) If you don't like BofA, I'm sure the competition will welcome your business....
    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
  95. Does this mean the Phantom is doomed by TrueSpeed · · Score: 0

    Considering that OS/2 was the primary OS of the Phamton, does this mean the Phantom will never see the light of day?

  96. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by PigIronBob · · Score: 1

    vs cooperative as in pre windows 95, the apps had to be nice to each other. One single app could drag the whole box down on its arse. Ahhhhhh the memories!

    --
    You never catch me alive
  97. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Most of them updated to ver 4 for Y2K. Some even upgraded to NT as NT (at least till Win2k) still runs text mode 16 bit OS/2 fine

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  98. Somewhere in the distance... by B11 · · Score: 0

    A penguin is heard laughing its ass off.

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
  99. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Captain Obvious!

  100. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by James_Aguilar · · Score: 1

    That's freakin' hilarious. I thought that the writer meant to say "Preeminent," and I made fun of him, when in reality, I was the one who didn't know what he was talking about.

    Who'da thought there was something called a "pre-emptive" multitasking environment!

  101. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by sonicattack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bah.

    A real ATM should run a real Operating system.

  102. OS/2 Userbase shocked at recent developments!!! by SMS_Design · · Score: 5, Funny

    The OS/2 userbase was totally shocked upon hearing this news from IBM. He then went to the fridge and got a soda.

    1. Re:OS/2 Userbase shocked at recent developments!!! by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      The OS/2 userbase was totally shocked upon hearing this news from IBM. He then went to the fridge and got a soda.

      Actually there are a number of developers still using OS/2 and there is also a connection to Open Source - Open Watcom. Open Watcom lets you cross develop for Win32, Win16, extended DOS, DOS and OS/2 in either C/C++ or Fortran 77 (lots of 90ish extensions).

    2. Re:OS/2 Userbase shocked at recent developments!!! by damicha · · Score: 1

      ... she ....!

    3. Re:OS/2 Userbase shocked at recent developments!!! by robyannetta · · Score: 1
      The OS/2 userbase was totally shocked upon hearing this news from IBM. He then went to the fridge and got a soda.

      Actually, I got a beer and poured it into my 386/DX40 running OS/2 2.1 while saying some really deep religious shit. I'm serious... Am I the only person here with a still-running running OS/2 box?

      --
      - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  103. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating system? Is that when you multitask before the user asks you to?

    Basically, yes. Once upon a time, there was cooperative multitasking (e.g. Windows 3.1). A program was given control of the system's resources (CPU, etc.) and the program and the OS had a gentleman's agreement that the program would return control of the resources after using up its timeslice. This worked as long as all programs cooperated properly . . . which of course means it sucked.

    Preemptive multitasking means the OS preemptively takes control of the resources when the program's time is up, without asking. So, if a rogue program starts eating up cycles and generally acting like an asshole, the rest of the system doesn't suffer (much). Anyway, OS/2 had it first in the early 90s (along with Linux), and Windows didn't really have it implemented decently until 2000.

  104. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by brilinux · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Adam's machine is down for a while from a messed up Solaris upgrade, and he is running off of a backup file server, and then you post a link to it from Slashdot? Nice...

  105. So where's the torrent? by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    Isn't it our job to keep it alive through torrenting?

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  106. OS/3? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't IBM open the OS/2 source, and include it in a Linux distro as an "OS/2 binary 'emulation' layer"? Wouldn't that allow lots of Windows programs to run under that Linux distro? And couldn't the WINE project use the opened source to make WINE work better? Is there some mojo still left in the unholy alliance with Microsoft that still compels IBM to keep the source proprietary, even to the grave?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:OS/3? by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      I thought about this too. but then I realised

      (Is there some mojo still left in the unholy alliance with Microsoft that still compels IBM to keep the source proprietary, even to the grave?)

      Not neccesarily an alliance - but if someone else owns parts of the source code that IBM licensed from a third paty they might have to remove any proprietary stuff before they can do this,.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    2. Re:OS/3? by bjoeg · · Score: 1

      AFAIK OS/2 only supported running Win16 applications. They never got around to do Win32.

  107. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

    What is that, some version of DOS?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
  108. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by kloffinger · · Score: 0

    Usually while eating TCBY Yogurt.

  109. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by sonicattack · · Score: 1

    Certainly looks that way.

    I took the photos back in 2000 or so. (This is in Karlskrona, Sweden, btw.) Until then, I had no idea what powerful O/S was running those machines. I ran to borrow the camera when I found out.

  110. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally when I go to the ATM, I fear the BSOZ.

    You know, the Blue Screen Of Zeros, which details the amount of... money in each of... my accounts... Nooooooooo !

  111. Keeps on ticking ... by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 1

    that's cool -

    I'd built some apps running on an OS/2 "pc server" running in a back closet during my time at IBM. Almost 4 years later, it was still going with my (or any other dev afaik) touching it.

  112. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    You think that's bad? With Wells Fargo, I have to choose between English and Hmoob.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  113. Can I get OS/2 for free? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    At one point they were giving away copies free with magazines so surely I can get it legally without paying.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Can I get OS/2 for free? by os2fan · · Score: 1

      OS/2 v 4.0 appeared on a magazine cover over here in Australia, beside BeOS and some linux.

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  114. The OS for the "Internet Generation" by microcars · · Score: 1
    There is a guy on one of my non tech lists who actually has the link to ecommstation.com in his sig and it says:
    "The OS for the Internet Generation!"

    I just Googled that phrase and it seems he is the only one using it. AND no one seems to be paying much attention to him.

    oh well, he tried,
    sorry Tom (aka BigMiniGuy, aka BigWarpGuy...)

    --
    I like microcars
  115. OS/2 Helped Many down the Enlightened Path by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Was Full of Firsts (for me, anyway):
    • My first exposure to the GNU tools
    • My first exposure to a "native" TCP/IP implementation (anyone remember that winsock.dll you hadda get before Windows would get online?)
    • First install and config of NCSA httpd
    • First "Professional Certification" ("OS/2 Engineer" ... oh, how that did impress the ladies ...)
    • First User Group meetings, etc.

    Learned a decent amount about OS internals. Certainly led me and others down "enlightened paths" later in life (from an OS PoV).

    getting verklempt ...

    Knew ye well, OS/2. Rest in Peace.

  116. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by toddbu · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sounds like Windows will have competition on an even wider base.

    They've updated the error message in Longhorn to make it much more comprehensible to the average user. The new message reads:

    Unable to write to disk in drive C:
    Data, cash, or files may be lost
    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  117. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, large numbers of ATM machines ran OS2, which is why you don't see the BSOD when you go to grab some cash.

    I saw a newer Diebold ATM running some form of WinXP a few months ago. It was showing a desktop... I dunnno why. Also, I noticed a lot of gas station POS systems running OS/2.

  118. Hot Water Heater. (n/t) by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    This space available.
  119. Me too. Except it was a freebee. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1
    But it never would run on my main machine.

    Not the keyboard driver though. Apparently my MB had the right controller. But drivers or lack thereof, IIRC it was the EIDE controller.

    Also the install process was a bitch as the freebee was on floppy and the install would crash. Buy the time I found a machine that would run it I hated it.

    Came back to that partition a month later. Never liked it. Too busy to switch espically if it is obvious you are just trading devils.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  120. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by techathead · · Score: 1

    Wait that is my pin..... gotta go change it now, thanks.

  121. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by toddbu · · Score: 1

    Hey, you gotta admit that they have some really great commercials. Like the one where you stick in all your money into the machine and it counts it bill by bill, displaying each bill with a large picture on the screen so that the guy behind you can see just how much cash you just deposited. I hear rumors circulating that their next innovation will be to have the machine count out the bills that it's dispensing in a loud, clear voice - just like a real teller would. You know, "one hundred, two hundred, three hundred..."

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
  122. Tuna fish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (do I win?)

    1. Re:Tuna fish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you tune a fish?

  123. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by blisspix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Indeed. IBM pretty much left the ATM market entirely about 5 years ago. There's only a few left, most are Diebold (which I curse every time I have to use one)

  124. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by MisaDaBinksX4evah · · Score: 1

    ATM machine is the machine which dispenses the ATMs

    Dude, I so want one of these. I'd just start sticking ATMs in random places. In fact, if done right, this is probably a reasonably good way to take over the world, or cause massive mobs of enraged tourists whose cards were eaten, or both. Think of the possibilities!

    --
    Misa no botha with yousa.
  125. Because cost of support exceeded revenue by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    At some point that happens, the amount of money you spend supporting something exceeds the amount of money you make on support contracts.

    What probably did it was ATM upgrades. That was the big OS/2 market. Well newer ATMs all started going to Windows. When Y2K was approaching, ATMs needed an upgrade to support it. Though some chose to upgrade their OS/2 ATMs, many decided since the ATMs were being upgraded anyhow, fuck it, upgrade verything and go to Windows, it's prettier anyhow.

    Also I'm willing to bet some increased costs are comming up, since banks are probably starting to think of moving to new encryption hardware sooner or later now that AES is fairly well established.

    So probably they decided it just wasn't profitable anymore, and cut it.

    1. Re:Because cost of support exceeded revenue by Randseed · · Score: 1
      Yep. And you haven't lived until you drive up to an ATM on a dark night in a admittidly well-lit area, stick you card in, get asked the stupid "Engles or Espanol?" question, and then watch it BSOD with your card still inside. Then you sit by until it reboots, hoping your card will come out.

      What seems like five minutes later, your card comes rocketting out of the machine at warp 9 like it always does. Then wash, rinse, repeat.

      Ah, the joys of a Windows world. Every time I walk up to one of the Diebold machines, I expect it to start popping up sex ads, asking me if I want to install Gator, or God only knows what else.

    2. Re:Because cost of support exceeded revenue by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Guess I haven't lived, as that's never happened to me, I've never had an ATM fail on me. However popups and such aren't a worry, it's not a full version of Windows it runs, and it's connected to the bank via an IBM encryption card. The security doesn't come form the software, it'd be stupid to rely on that, it comes from an extremely robust peice of hardware that is, for all intents and purposes, uncrackable.

      However if random bashing of companies makes you feel good, go right ahead.

    3. Re:Because cost of support exceeded revenue by Randseed · · Score: 1
      It wasn't random bashing of companies. Well, okay, the comment about Gator was, but the BSOD issue actually happened to me. Judging from the BSOD, I'd guess it was some kind of driver issue.

      To its credit, the thing did detect that it was out to lunch and reboot, and it did return my card when it rebooted and discovered that it had one in the reader.

  126. OS/2 ? Huh? by asset_wrangler · · Score: 1

    OS/2? People are still using OS/2?

    -- My 2nd computer was the peanut (IBM PC/jr)

  127. OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    I remember that day I brought that box with 30-something floppy disks home from Wal-Mart. Yes kids, Wal-Mart sold OS/2 back in the olden days.

    I was a "beta tester" for Warp 4 "Merlin" just so I could get it on a CD and get it early.

    It was fun while it lasted, it was fun running it before the Windows users got their "pre-emptive multitasking" Windows 95.

    Then came along Windows NT and I finally retired OS/2.

    RIP OS/2, and thank you.

    1. Re:OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Uhm windows NT nor any of the 9x OS'es were pre-emptive they were all co-operative. Im not sure about 2000 or XP as i hadn't paid attention to that since the late 90's but im pretty sure their co-op as well.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    2. Re:OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      I remember OS2 2.0 with it's big stack of disk which i think was close to if not over 30 itself. Then i got the OS2 2.1 warp upgrade which also had a huge stack of disks.

      Thoughs were the days.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    3. Re:OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used OS/2 for 3 years. It was MUCH better than DOS/Windows 3.X. Hell, it was better than Win95/98/ME! But I switched back to W95 because if IBM couldn't sell OS/2 for 3 years against Win3.1, it sure wasn't going to sell against W95! :(

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by WWE-TicK · · Score: 1

      You idiot. WinNT always followed a pre-emptive multitasking model. Win9x preemptively multitasked Win32 applications only.

    5. Re:OS/2 Warp 3 was my first non-Windows OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bailed on OS/2 after a attending a Users Group meeting at IBM Charlotte and heard that IBM's marketing plan for OS/2 was to wait until the Win95 roll-out failed and pick up the pieces.

      Well Hope is not a plan, so I started learning NT.

  128. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Acutally.... Most of those ATM machines you see in Deli's, liquor stores, and otherwise still run OS/2 1.3 - the Microsoft/IBM release.

  129. And close it again with the Single Input Queue Key by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Is that bug still a showstopper? It was 10 years ago.

  130. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by yahwotqa · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OS/2 may not show the BSOD, but it does crash from time to time. Even in ATMs. It's hard to find an O/S that never crashes.

    Yes, I've had this happen to me, although it was probably more of an application fault:

    I inserted my card, pressed one of the context buttons on side of the screen to choose language, and when PIN prompt screen appeared, I pressed the same button again. Poof, screen went dark, and next thing I saw on screen was a nice, shiny OS/2 logo.

    Fortunately, after two or three(!) reboots, the ATM software started up properly, and the machine spat out my card.

  131. They DID ! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    They DID count the number of time OS/2 was mentionned.
    But most of the time, they occured in Simon's Bastard Operator From Hell, who cited the OS/2 fan club. The whole 2 of them.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  132. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by ad0gg · · Score: 1

    I've had it freak out on reading my card, i highly doubt it was an OS issue since the OSs are pretty much stripped of everything. It was probably the driver for magnetic card reader.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  133. OpenBSD by EventHorizon · · Score: 0

    Try OpenBSD. Clean, stable, secure, well-documented, with an installer that doubles as an IQ high-pass filter.

    If you don't know what that means, you are probably a better fit for Debian 3.1's new sunny-walk-in-the-park installer. Noob.

    1. Re:OpenBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank you; I was serious about using OS/2 so I could be an elitist snob because that is an attitude I honestly respect and admire. Thank you for endearing your operating system to me with the promise of a difficult install and an unfriendly community.

  134. NOT just Windows clones... by PlacidPundit · · Score: 1

    There are always the OPENSTEP/Mach clones. :-)

    1. Re:NOT just Windows clones... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yes I liked OpenStep, used it for a while. I think the real problem is I've just gotten to old to be tweeking Linux all the time due to things being upgraded and changing.
      Booted to my debian partition the other day just to be reminded that PPP got broken somewhere, most likely when recompiling the kernel so it would see all 80 GB of my HD which I had to jumper to 32 GB to stop my BIOS from crashing. OS/2 just saw my 80 GBs and a simple xcopy moved it over and away I went.\
      I do have the source for OpenStep here, have to revisit it and see if it will compile but mostly I've just been using blackbox (on OS/2)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  135. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by identity0 · · Score: 1

    But was it using OS/2 Operating System, or did it have Windows NT technology with BSOD screens? Man, Windows crashes are annoying.

    I would RTFA the article, but if I IIRC, those IBM machines have been going out of style for decades. I've heard new ATM machines have a Universal USB bus just like a PC computer, and you can use biometric ID identifier devices.

  136. Waving the mouse around in the air by Animats · · Score: 1
  137. W2K failed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, Windows 2000 was bad, but not a total failure!

    1. Re:W2K failed? by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

      I still use win2k. i went to a microsoft playtest a few months back and i was given a free 100% legit copy of winxp and while it wasn't terrible or anything i installed win2k again when my hard drive went. I understand that winxp is more secure and all, but common sense keeps most issues at bay, along with a virus scanner and whatnot.

  138. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by g2racer · · Score: 1

    Pre-emptive... Wasn't that the explanation that Dubaya gave for invading Iraq?

  139. Hmm... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Where do I go to turn in my OS/2 Certified Engineer card? OS/2 was a great OS and as far as I know there's still nothing out there that talk to IBM big iron like it does. The last big user I saw who was using it were Bank of Austria back around '99. I had to go over there and sort some driver issues out for them.

    There were really only 1 or 2 really major bugs that I feel really hurt OS/2's chances. IBM was never keen on fixing them no matter how many users complained. I also don't recall a single native OS/2 program that used threads as effectively as they could have been used. The workplace shell was easily corrupted and God help you if you managed to trash your desktop with all the objects that they liked to register everywhere.

    Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. It paid the bills for me throughout the '90's and I'll fondly remember doing the '95 Comdex in Atlanta with Team OS/2 (That's where I got certified) and threatening to mug "Team Microsoft" (A buch of MS employees MS brought with them so they could pretend they had a grass roots movement too) and leave them duct taped in one of the back booths that no one ever goes to.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Hmm... by mal69 · · Score: 1

      I can tell you a native 16 bit OS/2 program that used threads VERY well. Aldus PageMaker. It ran rings around the same Windows version.

      I was a big OS/2 bigot. The biggest design bug in my book with the single input message queue. I gather they didn't feally fix that properly because of some backwards compatibility concerns. One messed up app would look to lock up the machine and the later work-around fixes just didn't cut it...

    2. Re:Hmm... by chiph · · Score: 1

      I also don't recall a single native OS/2 program that used threads as effectively as they could have been used.

      There was a newsgroup reader from someone (StarDock?) that used threads very effectively. You could be reading & replying while it was syncing with the NNTP server in the background.

      Chip H.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Hell StarDock also did the famous Galactic Civilization for Os/2, it had a really greate AI that run in a separate thread. I remmber talking to someonje from Stardoick aboyt doing a windows port and they said it couldn be done because of winbdows limitations. They did finally release it for win32 2 years ago.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    4. Re:Hmm... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I never got to play with PageMaker for OS/2, nor Galciv or the newsreader mentioned in another reply. Actually most of the software that I did get to play with were either in-house IBM apps that didn't use threads because they were direct Windows port or actual DOS/Windows software running in OS/2. I got into OS/2 to begin with because it made such a great DOS development platform. Ironically the native OS/2 ports of Windows apps didn't run as well as the windows apps in emulation because the emulated windows apps didn't block the system input queue.

      I'd say the single system input queue was the most-complained about bug in OS/2. Interestingly, if you ran OS/2 on a multi-processor system a system input queue was created for each processor. I had a test app that would fill a system input queue up on a single-processor OS/2 machine, and you could run it on a mult-processor one and still do things. There was a little monitoring tool that'd show the queue load and you'd see one get pegged and the rest continue running on the multi-processor system.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    5. Re:Hmm... by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      There is no Bank of Austria. We have the National Bank of Austria and Bank Austria, which is a private bank and thus not "of Austria".

      b4n

    6. Re:Hmm... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Oh, it was probably Bank Austria then. I flew in to Innsbruck to help 'em out on my way to Romnia, where we were outsourcing some development work.

      Damn good beer in Austria. If I could get the beer from Austria and the bratwurst from the Amtrack station in Chicago to the same place, I'm sure I could make a million dollars.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  140. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by TheoGB · · Score: 1

    I've seen cashpoints with BSODs so don't be so proud of that technological terror.

    That said, when I worked for German PC shop chain, Escom, back in 1994/5 they had just got in the first Pentium machines and they had OS/2 free with them. Windows 95 cost £50 extra I think.
    Br That was the first and last time I saw OS/2

  141. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... so an ATM dispenses Automated Tellers?

  142. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by DingerX · · Score: 1

    Last time I went to buy a train ticket in Italy, the poor guy there spent 5-10 minutes on this antique computer trying to dial it up. Then the darn thing crashed and he had to reboot... splash screen:

    OS/2 Warp

    I guess it still beats Chicago.

  143. A sad day. by clawDATA · · Score: 0

    I ran a multiline Waffle BBS offering Usenet and email in 91/92 on an 8 Meg 386-40 running OS/2, while at the same time using the computer to type my essays in Word Perfect (being a starving university student at the time and not being able to afford a second computer.)

    I remember between trying to decide between OS/2 and SCO Xenix (I was previously a SCO tech-support weenie, and had several installations from a VAR that went out of business).

    OS/2 won because I could play Duke Nukem -- the original 2D Duke Nukem! Plus OS/2 just plain looked cool.

    When Linux came out I ditched it. Long live Yggdrassil!

    --
    "This is totally insecure, but very convenient."
  144. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by DenDave · · Score: 1

    Thats quite funny because I have seen a number of ATM's in EU (notably ABNAMRO) which have had Windows NT error message dialogs and indeed BSOD's!

    --
    -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
  145. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

    Some people are so good at using the ATM that THEY are ATM machines.

  146. History by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Younger readers might not remember much (or anything) about OS/2 and the history behind it.

    This is my understanding, anyone correct me if I'm wrong on some points, please:

    Microsoft developed OS/2 for IBM, as a sort of next generation operating system. And it was; it was fast, efficient, good looking, responsive, easy to develop under, with a much cleaner API than Win32.

    I'm not sure if Microsoft sold OS/2 itself, but I seem to vaguely remember that there was a Microsoft version of it, as well as an IBM version of it, with only minor differences. It's my recollection that all indications were that Microsoft was going to put its weight behind OS/2.

    After getting IBM heavily committed to it, they turned around and worked on their own, incompatible, equivalent (NT). It really was quite a screw job on the part of Microsoft to intentionally lead IBM astray, in my view. A faily anti-competitive way to weild their growing clout.

    Wikipedia has some interesting history on it.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:History by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well you're on the right track somewhat.

      IBM and Microsoft worked together on OS2 IBM did most of the code for 1.0 and started working on 2.0 while MS was supposed to sell 1.0 and a new GUI MS called windows that was supposed to be incorperated into OS2 around 2.0 or 2.1 as well as work on 3.0 as the next gen 3.0 ended up being NT BTW yep NT is the offspring of OS2. Anyway while IBM was working on 2.0 MS as some have said was having arguments with IBM about memory requirments as well as price for the new OS turned around and saw windows flying off the shelves and decided they didn't need a new OS or IBM so Gates and CO. bailed on IBM to sell windows. IBM was left to work on OS2 themselves but because of the deals with MS IBM had the rights to include the Windows code into OS2 through 2.1 which is why OS2 2.0 had partial windows 3.0 code in it and 2.1 warp had the full windows 3.1 code in it.

      Well after 2.0 finally came out around the time MS was selling windows 3.0 MS started getting scared that OS2 would end up taking their desktop sales away due to a better more stable and flexible OS so they took their OS2 3.0 code off the shelf dusted it off and finished it off with some new things that had been learned since it had been shelved and called it windows NT for New Technology and said everybody would be able to use that. But they couldn't get Dos which people at the time needed for backwards compatability for dos programs people were using at the time to work in NT without breaking security needed for buisness so to satisfy everybody they said that NT would be for buisness and they would write a new version for everybody else which at the time they called NT Lite which later became 93 then 94 and then 9x for whenever they relesed it and finally 95 which as it turned out they shouldn't have released it at that time as it still was buggy and flawed and far from being a new OS with some dos code running under the new OS for compatability with old programs as it turned out 95 was still a shell running old dos with the same problems of dos. As a final point OS2 2.0 had suffered most of the smae problems as 95 like the registry coruptions etc.. and had fixed thoughs problems by the time OS2 2.1 warp was released before win 95 even came out suffering the same ills.

      Really i don't know if MS lead IBM astray so much as just abandoning them. Leaving them in the lurch as it were or leaving them holding the bag as far as working on the subequent versions goes. But IBM was just as bad for OS2 as MS was mainly because of how IBM does things OS2 found itself competeing against other IBM projects for money for things like paying for programers and advertising etc. against ideas and inventions by other parts of IBM including some that had come fro the CEO and VP of IBM at the time. It's things like this that lead to stupid commercials for OS2 that left people not knowing exactly what the heck OS2 was. One featured a couple dancing on a dance floor with words poping up in the corner saying something about OS2 will make your life easier but said nothing about what OS2 was or how it was supposed to make anyones life easier. So IBM was doing plenty on it's own to sabatage OS2 even without MS who if they hadn't left to sell windows and later do NT and 95 would just have in some way weasled the rights to OS2 away from IBM by hook or crook anyway so it didn't really matter OS2 was doomed no matter how things played out. As things worked out we still ended up with OS2 just with a different name and MS shockingly weasled it away from IBM by taking the code which was OS2 at the core shelving it for a few years after they broke off from IBM and then finishing it under a new name without giving any royalties or sharing any of the profits from it with IBM even though it had used code written by programers working for IBM.

      But thats MS for you.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    2. Re:History by jm2morri · · Score: 1

      I was working as a coop at IBM about the time OS/2 Warp was just being released (I got a copy for $50CDN which was cool). Anyways, rumor has it, that MS was so scared that this would dent into their Windows market that they bought _every_ floppy disk in North America making it impossible for IBM to meet customer demand (it took something like 30 floppies--this was before CDROM's were common). So IBM put all this money into marketting and pushing this new OS and when they tried to turn on the sales tap nothing flowed. This hurt IBM a lot and kept up for months until IBM could secure their own supply of floppy disks.

      Ingenious but really dirty on MS's part.

    3. Re:History by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      BTW yep NT is the offspring of OS2.

      This is not strictly true. The product that became Windows NT was going to be the "high end" version of OS/2 - portable, multiuser, heavily multithreaded, SMP capable, microkernel[ish], etc, etc. This was the OS/2 Microsoft was working on 1988 - onwards.

      The product that was (at the time, yet to be released) OS/2 2.x was going to be the "consumer" version of OS/2. Basically the OS/2 equivalent of Windows 9x. It wasn't portable, wasn't SMP, was single user, etc, etc. This was the OS/2 IBM were working on with Microsoft in the mid to late 80s.

      Both of these versions of OS/2 were going to replace the DOS+Windows combo.

      Then Windows 3.0 - and later 3.1 - were unexpected runaway successes. Microsoft started wanting to make "OS/2 NT" more like Windows than older versions of OS/2.

      Then Microsoft and IBM split. Since "OS/2 NT" was basically all Microsoft's work, they took it with them to continue development, eventually releasing Windows NT - which lives on today as Windows XP and 2003.

      IBM went back to the OS/2 2.X code (which at the time was their responsibility, although Microsoft still owned parts like HPFS) and proceeded to released OS/2 3.x and 4.x. "eComstation" developed from the codebase.

      So NT isn't really a "descendent" of OS/2, because they don't have any common heritage, apart from a name and a failed business partnership. They don't share any sort of architectural similarities and really the only thing remotely in common is some "optional" APIs for legacy support.

      NT was always supposed to replace the DOS-based versions of Windows. Windows 95 was the "NT lite" bridge product that was supposed to get everyone off DOS-based Windows and onto NT. There was never supposed to be a Windows 98 or Me. The problem was people kept demanding their low-level DOS and Windows compatibility - particularly with old hardware devices - that NT simply cannot provide. So the timetable got stretched out by 5 - 10 years.

  147. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by crutchman · · Score: 0

    Well, it makes more sense if you think of it as the "Any-Time Money Machine" But nothing is better than seeing an ATM BSOD, or seeing the Windows Desktop on an ATM. A very expensive Diebold Media Player. Gee...Imagine that...people are actually worried about the security about Diebold voting machines? Funny how I haven't seen any mass-complaints relating to Diebold ATM's. Was O/S 2 a better platform for ATM's? If for no other reason, obscurity. You can argue all of the merits of O/S 2 till the cows come home, but the switch to Windows was eventually gonna happen just from sheer market share numbers. (No! I didn't want to drag that money to the recycle bin! I was trying to drag it to checking)

  148. Oh how we Amiga owners chortled by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 0

    At the OS/2 adds. proudly lording this new "Mul-tie tasking" feature that my MIG had been doing for years.

    wow it can print and I don't have to wait!! (so I could print, play music and write a program symaltaniously)

    Error: Spellchecker missing, using dyslexia instead.

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  149. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by -brazil- · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I programmed ATMs in my last job, and
    actually, the ATM OSes are usually not stripped of anything but quite complete, at least when it's Windows. They just have a lot of functions disabled via registry. However, you're right in that the biggest source of problems are the drivers for the special hardware - or the interaction between the drivers and the ATM app. There is a standard for these things (WOSA XFS), but it's the most badly-defined and badly-supported standard I've ever seen.

    --

    The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
    --Henry Kissinger

  150. And now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Release the damnit SOURCE CODE for the love of God!!!

  151. "Upgrading" by olman · · Score: 1

    In fact, us old farts remember Microsoft plugging upgrades from OS/2 Warp to Dos 6.22!!

    I kid you not. They really marketed it that way. Goebbels would be proud.

    All things being equal, most any things being marketed at the time WRT NT 3.5x and Windows 95 was utter and complete festering crap.

    There's one gigantic advantage to using NT, thought. It can really, truly kill a process 99.5% of the time, no matter if the app is FUBARred or not. With OS/2 reboot was necessary from time to time since you had too many hung apps kicking around which you couldn't kill no matter what. Yes, I had all those fancy-schmancy "kill" drivers installed, none worked. If the app wouldn't/couldn't process it's exit list, it was there for good.

    Another huge downside was that a single misbehaving app could freeze the user interface. Yeah, every app would still RUN, but you couldn't do anything!

    There was eventually patch/kludge to help this a bit but on NT this never was a problem.

    For the record, I skipped the dos-based windows series (95, 98, ME) and jumped on happy bill wagon when they came up with W2k. Finally they made an os that didn't, basically, suck.

    1. Re:"Upgrading" by boskone · · Score: 1

      In warp, there was a free app called threadkiller that worked 99+% to kill any thread. it was nice and took up very little space in WPS

    2. Re:"Upgrading" by olman · · Score: 1

      Like I said, been there, done that, didn't work.

      I went thru quite a few of those, many with drivers.

    3. Re:"Upgrading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bogus, Warp was much better at killing rogue apps and leaving the rest of the OS running than NT 3.51 or NT 4.0(which was the 95 shell on 3.51 kernel with minor improvements). Rebooting my Warp box occurred when I made hardware changes, and the odd blue moon when we would be debugging a code base early in its development stage. NT 3.51 sucked, and we always wrote first for OS/2, second for NT.
      Things changed, but I had left by then. I still think they made the wrong decision by getting those dicks from DEC to help code NT in the first place. They modeled it around DEC mainframe style computing instead of Unix. There is a book about the development of NT that I read where they went into detail why they chose it, but I still think it was because they had brought in DEC hardware people to help design an OS.

    4. Re:"Upgrading" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warp 3.0 was released in late '94, and MS was releasing (and marketing heavily) Windows 95 at the time. I certainly don't remember seeing ads offering an upgrade from a 32-bit OS that was the first to offer built-in Internet support to a 16-bit OS that had no GUI.

    5. Re:"Upgrading" by olman · · Score: 1

      And which alternate reality are you coming from?

      Having used NT 3.51 and 4.0 at work for a couple of years, it was rock solid, if ugly and boring.

  152. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by zsau · · Score: 1

    Acronyms are usually treated linguistically as adjectives when they're still pronounced as acronyms. 'ATM' is a word on its own that derives from 'automatic teller machine', but does not necessarily parse as that. The fact that enough people use the word like that means that you are wrong, though you have history on your side.

    --
    Look out!
  153. OS/2 for free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For about 10 or so years ago i bought a $5 game at a small retailer here in Norway. I didnt want the game, but they where giving away free OS/2 versions with every value game purchase. And that nice, big, plastic wrapped box had a strange appeal to a young man...

    Never tried the os though...

  154. Two words... by The+Fold · · Score: 1

    Good riddance...

    Seriously.

    I worked for a company that used OS/2 on a lot of their boxes and it was a complete nightmare to work with. I also cited vengence on it after an ATM running it ate my friends card and then rebooted (not during a scheduled maintenence)

  155. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

    I've seen some ATMs run on Windows ME these days. It was obvious when a tech opened it and rebooted the machine, it showed the Windows ME boot logo.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  156. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    You know, "one hundred, two hundred, three hundred..."
    "My my, that's a lot of cash you got there buddy. You sure you want to walk around with all that on you? four hundred, five hundred...

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  157. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do come to the Netherlands then. We get blue screens and "Driver cannot be found" errors on most of our cash machines. Except for the older types, which are also around twice as fast and loads more reliable...

    Seriously, to my horror most stuff here runs on windows. I'm expecting dutch railways (www.ns.nl) to bring out a report stating they switched to windows around 2.5 years ago as since then, the amount of train collisions has gone from 0 between 1970 and 2002 to 4 between 2002 and 2005 (all as far as I know). Windows just crashes too much :)

  158. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Alioth · · Score: 1

    I wonder if any of these ATM machines still run the Microsoft MS-DOS Operating System.

  159. Re:Well, that's sad news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still some lunatics beating their heads against the RISC OS wall.

  160. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can confirm this only because while returning to Heathrow airport on Thursday morning, the damn ATM crashed in the middle of my transaction. As it rebooted OS/2 Warp flashed across the screen. Unfortunately for me the ATM swallowed my card and my bank advised me to cancel it.

    So yes ATM's use OS2, and yes OS2 machines crash.

  161. Re:Well, that's sad news... by tomjen · · Score: 1

    NO, that price goes to dos. Spend two entire afternoons trying to get it to work on my brothers computer.

    --
    Freedom or George Bush
  162. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newer ones are running Win. They're communicating over TCP/IP now, as well. Believe it or not, that's a recent development. And yes, there will be hacks. Most financial institutions aren't nearly as security-concious as the man in the street probably thinks. You wouldn't *believe* what goes on in some of the smaller credit unions--the ones with only a few thousand members, and a staff of three.

  163. Complete socket implementation? by argent · · Score: 1

    My first exposure to a "native" TCP/IP implementation (anyone remember that winsock.dll you hadda get before Windows would get online?)

    Did they do a complete socket implementation or only the half-assed one Microsoft and Be managed, where you had to use different calls on sockets or files?

  164. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Funny
    Anybody with a PIN number goes to an ATM machine.

    Some of them have LCD Displays

  165. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by hugesmile · · Score: 1

    A quick Google Image Search shows a few images of ATM's with BSOD (admittedly many of the same ATM, but they're out there).

  166. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by DMNT · · Score: 1
    Anybody with a PIN number goes to an ATM machine.

    Only if it works with Windows 2003 Server, which is based on NT technology.

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR
  167. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by hugesmile · · Score: 1
    I entered my PIN number into an ATM machine, and took out $60 dollars.

    I know, I should STFU up...

    geez.. I read that, and didn't get the 3 jokes! I guess I see it too often that I accept the mistakes!

    Yesterday I actually heard a co-worker request something as ASAP as possible. I couldn't stop laughing.

  168. I thought... by zlogic · · Score: 1

    ... they've done that with the release of Windows 95, and that's 10 years ago.
    I've tried OS/2 Warp back in 1999. I think the version was something between 4.5 and 5.0
    It got installed in about three hours (or possibly even longer), looked like Windows 3.11 with extensions to make it look like '95. It was SLOW (the PC was a 486). It was actually slower than Windows 2000. It was swapping all the time.
    I don't like Windows at all, but my OS/2 experience was even worse. It is definetly not a desktop OS, and it's too outdated for a server one. More difficult to configure than Windows 2003 Server and more expensive than Linux/*BSD.

    1. Re:I thought... by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually OS2 didn't look like 95 as OS2 2.0 came out before 95 was even developed heck OS2 2.0 looking like 95 as you put it came out before windows NT which was Pre 95. It's been a while but i belive OS2 came out in 90, 91 several years before 95 and a couple years before NT.

      Not only that but IBM and MS had worked together on OS2 1.0 which came out in the 80's (this was before I got into IBM PC's i had dabbled with apple 2 in school but got into pc's in the late 80's so i didn't pay attention to IBM or MS didn't even know MS existed back then) but had broken up before 2.0 came out at the time MS was working on OS2 code which it shelved after the breakup and later dusted off after OS2 2.0 came out (one of the things OS2 2.0 and later had inside it was windows 3.0 and later 3.1 code because of an agreement between MS and IBM before they broke up for compatabilty with windows apps you could even make the desktop look like windows 3.0 and 3.1 or launch the 3.x shell ontop of OS2 which is where i think you are getting the it looked like 3.11 with 95 extentions they weren't 95 extentions they were 3.1 extentions) and finished it off calling it Windows NT. And later a hacked job using old dos for the 9x versions which were buggier than OS2 ever was mainly because of the fact the 9x versions were using Dos at their core.

      So to be fair windows looks like OS2 but wasn't as stable as OS2 but OS2 wasn't as stable as NT nor as fast as OS2 itself had Dos in it as well just not to the degree of windows 9x. It also was more flexible and able to do more at once than any 9x OS mainly because it was pre-emptive instead of being co-operative like all windows OS's are including NT, 2000 and XP. Though NT doesn't have the weakness of dos draging it down so it's still a better OS. As for 2000 being fast of course it is it was written at a later time with different code and programing for faster machines with more memory so of course 2000 is more optimised and faster and 2003 is easier to configure for the same reasons they were both written a decade later more in the case of 2003. Though the dificulty configuring is the same problem with linux and linux code is more recent than OS2 code so thats a pretty lame argument. But your right it is to old now for a OS let alone for a server. Back when OS2 1.0 came out i heard it was crap but when 2.0 came out it was a much better OS than windows 3.0 was and much more stable and a better OS didn't come along til MS got NT out and the bugs in that worked out so at the time OS2 was much better than anything else out their for an OS on the PC. But time and IBM's lack of keeping up on it along with the fact that most people just didn't know what OS2 was to begin with (which was all IBM's fault) pretty much doomed it.

      IBM was dooming it from the start anyway so it's not really like a suprise anyway. If they hadn't doomed it and had handled it right from the start it would be OS2 that 90 some percent of all pc's would be using today not windows. Take that for whatever it's worth but 95 suffered most of the same problems OS2 2.0 did almost 5 years after OS2 did and had fixed them so most people in 95 could have avoided things like corupt registries and other 95 problems by using OS2 2.1 which was out by that time. But IBM couldn't get it's head on straight and didn't relise what they had till it was way to late to do themselves any good. Heck they hadn't relised what they had for some time after 95 came out and by the time they did it was all over and everybody had gone home years before thats how far out of touch IBM was.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
  169. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by AngryScot · · Score: 1

    Same thing for the file allocation table table :D

    --

    All spelling mistakes are due to solar flares...honest

  170. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by six · · Score: 1

    Every time i'm going to the netherlands I'm certain I'm gonna stumble upon ATMs in various stages of crash / reboot / BSOD ...

    I don't know guys, maybe you should make a special case in your local drug laws concerning the people who code the damn things :)

  171. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by Goaway · · Score: 1

    It used to be a buzzword, sometime back in 1990 or so. The fact that the article submitter uses it today speaks volumes.

  172. OS/2, operating system, age 20 by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Truly an operating system icon...

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  173. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by makomk · · Score: 1

    Some ATMS, in the UK at least, do run Windows NT4 or 2000. They also seem to have a really kludgy startup sequence involving several parallel .BAT scripts, some of which use delays to ensure correct startup order - not to mention the fact that they're running Explorer in the background all the time.

  174. Trademarks are adjectives by tepples · · Score: 1

    Acronyms are usually treated linguistically as adjectives when they're still pronounced as acronyms.

    You mean "initialisms", but I get your point.

    In addition, trademarks are treated as adjectives no matter what form they take:

    • SPAM luncheon meat (even though the M stands for meat)
    • Band-Aid adhesive strips (even though the Band stands for bandage)
    • OS/2 operating system (even though the OS stands for operating system)
    1. Re:Trademarks are adjectives by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      I believe the grandparent post used the term "acronym" correctly.

      An acronym can be made up of initial characters (eg. FBI) of major parts of a compound term (eg. radar). An initialism is only made up of initial charatcters making it a subset of acronyms.

      Although the discussion started around ATM, an acronym but more precisely an initialism, I believe the usage you responded to was a general comment referring to all acronyms not just initialisms.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  175. Cat-people? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You must have a significant minority of Miao people in your area. "Hmoob" is the native spelling of Hmong, a term used here to mean the language of the Miao: 'hm' means a devoiced /m/ (devoiced /m/ and /n/ are whispered in some contexts); doubling a vowel indicates nasalization; the 'b' at the end indicates the tone of the preceding symbol. Best approximation in a European language is French mon.

  176. But does it play... by tepples · · Score: 1

    Vobis is still around today and doing pretty well. Comtech went bankrupt but was bought be another company and is still in business today. Unfortunately both are not experimenting anymore, you can buy the usual HP, Acer, Sony notebooks, an ipod or their own brandname computer there with WinXP.

    But does a Vobis computer play .ogg?

  177. Free it by GoatMonkey2112 · · Score: 1

    IBM should have made OS2 free about the same time that MS started giving away Internet Explorer for free.

  178. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

    > I don't think you've checked very recently. The vast majority of ATM's have been Windows based for at least 2 or 3 years.

    Actually at my bank (I won't disclose the name of the bank), they do use OS/2 WARP. I have seen a particular ATM reboot multiple times within the last few months

    The tellers (nonautomated), run XP on the desktop and reboot into DOS for certain operations

  179. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    especially since there are 4 of the jokes in there (PIN/number, ATM/machine, $/dollars, STFU/up)... ;)

  180. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by defile39 · · Score: 1

    You forgot to tell him to write it on the back of his ATM card. Now he'll just lose it again!

  181. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by jackbird · · Score: 3, Funny
    or the love of god it's ATM not ATM machine.

    So, do people understand you when you say you're going to the AT Machine?

  182. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Helevius · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Remember to connect your NIC card.

    Helevius

  183. Kill it if you want! by robyannetta · · Score: 1

    My OS/2 2.1 box from the early 1990's is still running. I haven't shut it down in years! What's especially scary is the 48MB IDE drive in it is still spinning too.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  184. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's "Automated Teller Machine"

  185. A Great Idea in it's time by crusty_architect · · Score: 1

    OS/2 came out at a time when we all wanted something 'not Microsoft', and something which would take advantage of the 80286 PROT mode. Then, OS/2 was it. Of course we all looked across at the current state of UN*X at the time. It was miserable, expensive (XENIX) and imature. So OS/2 was going to be it. Another Beta vs VHS really. Good guys - 0, Bad guys (M$) - 1. RIP OS/2

    1. Re:A Great Idea in it's time by prshaw · · Score: 1

      >> OS/2 came out at a time when we all wanted something 'not Microsoft',

      ???
      I thought Microsoft wrote OS/2 with IBM?

  186. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    I have seen more and more of them running Windows (2000)

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  187. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by KutuluWare · · Score: 2, Funny

    To be fair: Say "ATM" around a collection of geeks and see what's the first thing that pops into their head.

  188. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "ATM Machine" is just the grammatical error du jour of the day.

  189. Gee. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The tens of people who still use OS2 will be dissapointed.

  190. Could be worse by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    My ATM Machine is at UMB Bank.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Could be worse by cburley · · Score: 1
      My ATM Machine is at UMB Bank.

      In New Jersey, where my wife grew up, their bank had its home office in Red Bank, but they did most of their banking at a branch it had in Long Branch.

      So they often went to the Long Branch Branch of the Red Bank Bank!

      --
      Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  191. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    God, please no. I hate ATMs that talk. The one in my bank talks in a really annoying British accent, and LOUDLY. And you can't shut her up. I hate her. I've never hated a machine so thoroughly. I have bad dreams about meeting this woman while going in to see a human teller to make a deposit. I'm afraid I'll go nuts and they'll have to lock me up for my own safety... so now I just stick my money in my mattress and avoid the evil nasty British sounding ATM machine. Better than going to jail for beating the shit out of it.

  192. Open Source OS/2 by ehaggis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why won't IBM release OS/2 into the wild as Open Source? It is (was) a great Operating System.

    Goodbye OS/2,
    I will miss you,
    Goodbye to your cousin NT 4.0 too,
    Boo Hoo, Boo Hoo

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  193. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For the love of god it's ATM not ATM machine. No one goes to the Automatic Teller Machine Machine
    Acronyms are for losers who want to make themselves look smart by confusing people with jargon.

    Anyone with any sense calls them Cash Machines, or here in Ireland we most refer to them as the Drink Link.

    -- Kish Me I'm Iriss

  194. I LOVE the IBM OS/2! by SassyOS2 · · Score: 1

    I will do my best for OS/2!

    Sassy *** Team OS/2 Japan ***

  195. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by cjb-nc · · Score: 1

    A year or two ago I went to the NC SECU ATM down the block from my office. It was sitting at the AMI BIOS screen because of a memory failure. The BIOS was for a 486/33 CPU, which was ancient. So I'd imagine an ancient OS on an ancient CPU would run just fine.

  196. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by Col+Bat+Guano · · Score: 1

    It's everything a toilet isn't.

  197. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

    This was true even 2-3 years ago, but I think even *that* pool of OS/2 deployments has pretty much dried up. Certainly in Canada they're almost all Win2k or Linux based now...our bank (pick one of the five haha) was the last to my knowledge and we killed the last off late last year.

    I was using gopher and mosaic on OS/2 when Microsoft was still debating shipping a TCP/IP stack w/ Windows 95.

    RIP OS/2. They built you bigger, better, faster, but you were steamrolled by MS WalMart OS.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  198. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by TurboD33 · · Score: 1

    It's just like when people get on their Local LAN Networks, GUI interfaces, use TCP Protocol, and use their AIM Messenger.

  199. Single threaded IO queue was the bane by gelfling · · Score: 1

    One of the biggest problems with OS/2 Warp was the single threaded IO queue. If for whatever reason the IO queue got filled or broken in any way it would hard hang the system requiring a cold restart. There were some hacks to arbitrarily extend the length of the queue but that only postponed the pain.

  200. Actually... by eno2001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used OS/2 after I got fed up with DOS/Win3.1 crashing all the time. I was amazed at how much better of a desktop experience it provided in 1994 than Win3.1. It didn't have the slickness of Mac OS at the time, but it had a lot of things that went beyond Mac OS and were alsmot more NeXT-like. I used it for about a year, then Win95 came out and since I was into certain games that the OS/2 Windows subsystem didn't run well I moved to it.

    Interestingly enough, I tried OS/2 again after a few years just on a lark. By this time I'd gotten a job that introduced me to Windows NT4 and I'd been working with that for about 2 years. It really amazed me just how much OS/2 resembled NT4 in a lot of ways, only with a better GUI and much more reliable. The fact that a lot of banks used OS/2 for a long time, indicates just how well made OS/2 was at the time when compared to DOS/Win3.1, Win9x and early WinNT. I think Microsoft, kind of, caught up to OS/2 with Windows 2000 SP3 in terms of reliability. But MS still doesn't seem to "get" the concept of a proper Object Oriented desktop. OS/2 did. NeXTSTEP did. And of course, Mac OS X does.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Actually... by mrholyschmidt · · Score: 1
      But MS still doesn't seem to "get" the concept of a proper Object Oriented desktop. OS/2 did.

      IIRC, Microsoft programmed OS/2.

    2. Re:Actually... by tmasssey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Microsoft programmed OS/2 1.0 and PM. However, the WPS (the thing that gives you the object oriented GUI) and SOM (the thing that gives the *system* its object orientedness) were both 100% IBM.

    3. Re:Actually... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      "The fact that a lot of banks used OS/2 for a long time, indicates just how well made OS/2 was at the time when compared to DOS/Win3.1, Win9x and early WinNT."

      You're misjudging the purchasing habits of banks. All that the use of OS/2 demonstrates is the quality of meals, free trips and other perks IBM sales offered to big banks.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    4. Re:Actually... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      And security and reliability... You couldn't get that from Microsoft products back then and you're only barely getting that now.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainly the HPFS system, which they reused and renamed NTFS, and modified to be incompatible with HPFS. They fought over the desktop, and IBM had control, said Presentation Manager would be the desktop, not the Windows interface that Microsoft wanted to put in. Most of the development was IBM, but I do have a nice MPEG of Bill Gates claiming OS/2 was the future of computing.

    6. Re:Actually... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      It really amazed me just how much OS/2 resembled NT4 in a lot of ways, only with a better GUI and much more reliable.

      Not really. You'd be hard pressed to find many ways OS/2 and NT are[/were]at all similar.

      The fact that a lot of banks used OS/2 for a long time, indicates just how well made OS/2 was at the time when compared to DOS/Win3.1, Win9x and early WinNT.[...]

      Well, one must remember that *at the time* OS/2 was supposed to be the successor of DOS/Windows. You'd hope it was a lot better.

      I can't agree OS/2 [Warp] was better than NT4, however. Somewhat lighter on hardware, certainly - but then again it was doing less, so you'd expect that.

      I think Microsoft, kind of, caught up to OS/2 with Windows 2000 SP3 in terms of reliability.

      Interesting you say that, because it was the release of NT4 back in 1996 that dragged me away from OS/2 - primarily because OS/2 (while better than DOS+Windows 3.x) wasn't as stable.

      But MS still doesn't seem to "get" the concept of a proper Object Oriented desktop. OS/2 did. NeXTSTEP did. And of course, Mac OS X does.

      OS/2's GUI was its main strength (after about 1994 - 95). However, it was also quite complex to really use (ie: benefit from the OO part). I wouldn't agree that OS X's GUI is anything close to PM with regards to OO - I wouldn't even say it's as good as Windows.

    7. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS X is superior to Windows in its OO interface and management of the entire windowing system.

    8. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative, huh? PM wasn't coded by MS at all; they had developed the 3.0 version of Windows and wanted to replace Presentation Manager with it. That was nixed, and the great buddy-buddy partnership dissolved thereafter. MS went on to hire some DEC guys to give them a kernel for an OS (which was unfortunantely based heavily on DEC mainframe systems), and slapped the GUI they had developed on the front of that. PM was solely IBM's possession as was the kernel of 2.1.

  201. You can still buy OS/2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh. Whaddaya know.

  202. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Three leters for you.... G N U.
    Don't be a word nazi

  203. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidently, I was just visiting the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC), who had recently loaded new software onto their ATMs, and one of them rebooted moments before I got there. I arrived in time to watch it boot NT 4.0 SP6 advertising 512MB or RAM. It booted to a Windows desktop and spewed out errors on the login script, presumably preventing it from loading the ATM's native UI. Unfortunetly, the ATM doesn't feature a touch-screen, so further investigation was not possible.

  204. oh no, the world as we know is ending!!!!! by damicha · · Score: 1

    man o man!

    first Microsoft pulls MS Dos out from under my posterieur, now my beloved OS/2 with the 3.11 look and feel goes,

    what's next, they'll put me into an old folks home?

    The world as we know is crumbling ....

    I feel like in 'The Never Ending Story', the dark is creeping up on us!

    Next is assembly programming and ASIC design, I fear. We are heading back to the stone age!

  205. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by tookr · · Score: 1

    In addition to this, I'm reasonably certain that all of the cash registers, as well as some of the back-office systems for one of the major Australia supermarkets still run on OS/2 (on the cash-related back-office systems it's possible to open an About window showing the OS/2 logo and 'Copyright 1992'). The register software is actively maintained, but I'm guessing there haven't been any major changes recently.

    I guess, if it ain't broke, why fix it?

  206. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Jerom · · Score: 1

    Do you enter your pin number on an ATM machine while looking at the LCD display?

  207. Linux will be a step back by m50d · · Score: 1

    People criticised OS/2 as being massively overdesigned. However, it was properly designed, and over time it showed more and more. It's an incredibly well done and integrated system, especially for its time. The GUI and CLI work together better than any other OS, ever. Linux's open chucking-it-together development has no doubt helped it grow relatively quickly with relatively few paid workers, but the value of a good design shows through in the end. I really hope some way is found to carry OS/2 on.

    --
    I am trolling
  208. OS2 by certel · · Score: 1

    How unfortunate. I share the same history of using OS/2 with some of the BBS's I ran in the past. With the headstart it had on Windows, it should have only been a matter of time before it took the market. Sad to see it go.

  209. IBM Redbook OS/2 to Linux Client Transition by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1
    If you dig deep into the article web page, you will find a couple of interesting IBM Redbooks. One of them is the OS/2 to Linux Client Transition. It could server as a valuable primer to anyone in the Linux community needing a "get aquainted" book.

    This IBM Redbook provides information related to the viability of Linux as a client platform. It targets technical personnel who are involved in evaluating Linux as a possible client platform. It also targets administrators and support personnel who are responsible for supporting client systems. This redbook can also be helpful to anyone who is evaluating the potential of using Linux for enterprise client systems. However, the key focus is on environments where OS/2 is currently used.

    Many enterprises have been using OS/2 as a stable platform for critical enterprise client applications. However, as those enterprises look to the future, they look for a platform on which they can build a strategy that is open, standards-based, secure, and provides a cost-effective solution. Linux has become successful as a server platform in many of these same enterprises. It comes as no surprise that these enterprises also want to evaluate the possibility of including Linux for many of their client systems.

    This redbook describes platform and functional considerations for choosing Linux as a client platform. It examines techniques and facilities for administering Linux clients, coexistence of Linux clients with other platforms, and a technique to easily install Linux clients based on the well-known OS/2-based CID methodology.

    Table of Contents
    Chapter 1. Introduction to Linux
    Chapter 2. Platform considerations
    Chapter 3. Functional considerations
    Chapter 4. Linux client administration
    Chapter 5. Coexistence considerations
    Chapter 6. Migration considerations
    Chapter 7. Linux client installation
    Appendix A. Basic Linux for OS/2 users
    Appendix B. Additional material


    The most glaring omission however is how to PORT your desktop applications from OS/2 to Linux desktop. This book is more concerned with showing you the alternate applications for the basic "out of the box" user.
    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  210. Sigh by Foolomon · · Score: 1

    This event saddens me.

    Although I had to, as a matter of necessity for OS/2 has been dying for years now, switch to Windows development in 1996, my OS/2 experience opened up significant doors for me professionally.

    I can't believe the level of disinformation about the OS that I'm reading in here now, several years after the facts were clarified and disseminated. I'd love to dispell these preconceived "un-notions" but - let's face it - what's the point?

    OS/2 will never be Open Source. That's a shame, but a sad reality. Microsoft undoubtedly has a very good IP foothold on the source, in spite of the fact that their level of involvement starting from version 2.0 was basically limited to contributing the HPFS.

    Yes, Microsoft went very far in their attempts to stiffle OS/2 development. I recall one story where an MS employee told one of my colleagues (when I was still in IBM's research division) point blank that it should have been impossible for OS/2 to support SMP because they specifically designed portions of the kernel to prevent that. (On a side note, we could never get any hard evidence regarding this to use against them in court.)

    There are other anecdotal stories about MS vs. IBM vis-a-vis OS/2 development, but in the end it's all just a bunch of good popcorn stories.

  211. Banks loved OS/2... by Chordonblue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was stable. It had class. It was predictable in almost any environment. It scaled well between servers, ATMS, backend stuff and workstations. And, at least in the implementations I saw, it was efficient as hell.

    I worked for Meridian Bank back in the early 90's as a simple integration tech. Everything was cool - then came the buyout. It's inevitable - every bank eventually gets bought by another bank, and it happened on my shift on fine day.

    A lot of people lost their jobs, a lot of 'redundant' branches were closed. But for me, worse things happened. You see, Corestates was still using strung together DOS scripts and it was messy. User's workstations were downgraded to Novell/DOS/Win 3.11 with the OS loading on 4 or 16 Megabit Token Ring. On Audit Day (Wednesday), a user could expect to wait up to 15 minutes for their machine to boot into the network. It was ugly, the users hated us... Hell, I hated us! I didn't leave that job soon enough.

    Everyone there missed their 32-bit OS and as this was one year before Windows 95, it would be several years before they started getting 95/NT on the desktop. The horror!

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  212. Where's the OSS ATM? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I'm probably showing my ignorance, but on the surface, the code for an ATM doesn't look all that impossible.

    I'd think a Wx/python stack could be written is fairly short order that would handle most of the typical ATM functions.

    Lord knows if they got just 1 guy on the project who had some experience designing UI's it would be a superior product to what's currently deployed in one location.

    And the banks who are still running the OS/2 machines obviously aren't in a hurry to spend money on new hardware and software.

    Someone would have to figure out how to interface with the hardware but it's an IBMPC-compatible if it's running OS/2 and actual units can be picked up on eBay for modest money.

    One could commoditize the ATM market with an OSS software stack, and standards could be followed such that people could integrate COTS card readers, screens, bill dispensers, etc. into whatever plastic front is appropriate. Then it's not too hard to implement smart-cards biometrics, whatever because anyone can innovate.

    So are there any banking developers here who will kindly point out the folly of my ways?

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  213. OS/2 is dead, long live OS/2. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I worked with OS/2 it was running on a blade inside an AS/400 midrange doing Firewall dutys.

    After 2 years and daily calls to IBM for support, I came to the conclusion that IBM didn't put the dollars into OS/2 that it required. OS/2 was more unstable than Win95. IBM did the initial install of OS/2, all the software on it came from and was installed by IBM, and changes were only done by IBM. So you can't blame me for the problems.

    OS/2 also runs their Lan connect 3995 (?) jukeboxes. After the firewall issues, we went with SCSI direct connect to the AS/400.

    OS/2 is dead, long live OS/2.

  214. Oh the memories! by eyegone · · Score: 1


    I bought my last complete PC in 1995. (Built my own ever since.) I remember spending hours on the phone with the Midwest Micro (still around?) sales rep to verify exactly what sound card, video card, etc. would be in the machine -- all so I could be sure it would OS/2-compatible.

    What I remember most clearly, however, was spending almost $2,000 to upgrade the system to 32 MB of memory. OS/2 Warp on a 120 MHz Pentium with 32 MB of memory absolutely screamed!

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  215. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    Only if you've got Adobe Type Manager (ATM) installed

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  216. That's the home for AmigaOS4... by CaptainPotato · · Score: 1

    ...but that seems to be the favourite push of the new owners of Amiga. The 'real' Amiga (OS4) is still in beta, out with users, but it hasn't gone officially to a release version yet. I still live in hope (yes, I'm one of those sad individuals who still watches what AmigaOS is doing (or isn't, as the case may be), hoping for a resurrection ;) )

    Oh well, in any case, it's still more alive (officially, at least), than OS/2 ;)

    --
    I heard that your library burnt down and destroyed your only two books - and one was not even coloured in yet.
    1. Re:That's the home for AmigaOS4... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The 'real' Amiga (OS4) is still in beta, out with users, but it hasn't gone officially to a release version yet. I still live in hope (yes, I'm one of those sad individuals who still watches what AmigaOS is doing (or isn't, as the case may be), hoping for a resurrection ;) )

      I wouldn't consider you *really* "sad" unless you were living under the delusion that Amiga OS 4 is likely to do anything in the 'real' world. It's been out of the mainstream so long now that it's going to have to start from scratch on its own merits.

      Yeah, even considered separately from the hardware (which would of course be different nowadays anyway) it knocked spots off DOS/Windows 3.1, but that was a long time ago.

      Things have moved on, Linux is available, you can run a 'telnet' session under Windows without everything else hanging when it can't connect, and... sorry, I really don't care. If it was to be so much better than Windows/Linux, it would have to be radically different to the old Amiga OS, which would pretty much defeat the purpose. Why not start from scratch?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  217. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by TwoScoopsOfPig · · Score: 1

    Then nobody in the world goes to an ATM machine; they all have a distinct lack in the Personal Identification Number number area. Same goes for Network Interface Card cards, just to snub that one while I'm going on about it.

    --
    #include <disclaimer.h>
    #include <beer.h>
  218. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by operagost · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sure, I'd trust my money to the most unstable OS ever made!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  219. Personally, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being one of very few IBM OS/2 Professionals left in the world, I think IBM (once the SCO/IBM trial is over and IBM wins) should outright buy Novell. This way, they now OWN the Unix name and all rights to it, they'll own a major Linux distribution they can fix (since Novell crippled it) and ...

    (Pinky) Gee, Brain, what are we going to do tonight?
    (Brain) The same thing we do every night, Pinky - Try and take over the world!

  220. Re:Hey! - Netscraft says: by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    as of last year, it was pretty dead as far as internet site serving, stats here . 10 whole sites!

  221. Re:Hey! - Netscraft says: by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    that's down from 19 sites a year ago, so the numbers are in and Netcraft has confirmed, OS/2 is dying proof here I'm sad, I did Pascal and Foxpro development on OS/2 for construction estimating and scheduling.

  222. Your PIN Number by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    Its 1077, the price of a cheese pizza and a large coke back where you used to work, Panucci's Pizza.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  223. Black Arm bands anyone? by z3r0w8 · · Score: 0

    I will be wearing mine for 30 days. I remember going to my buddies house who was the regions OS/2 rep. He had 200+ copies of excel running in minimized windows because he could! And no crashes...sigh Here's to an OS before its time.

    --
    -----
  224. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Wont somebody please think of the MAINFRAMES!

    Last I checked, IBM's latest version of bigiron had an OS/2 based controller front end

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  225. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    There was an unhappy ATM machine near where I live that (for a period of a few weeks) every day by about 10pm would be displaying a "Visual C++ runtime error!" windows dialog :)

  226. Only a few to go ... by Eric604 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks like AmigaOS is slowly crawling to the top again. heheheh

  227. me too! me too! by pointbeing · · Score: 2, Informative
    I had a two-node PCBoard BBS running under OS/2 - which was considerably more stable than Windows 3.1 and not nearly as scary as using something like Desqview to multitask DOS applications ;-)

    Like others, I ran OS/2 until Windows 95 came out. IBM used to advertise that you could get 736k available in a DOS box under OS/2 and I came pretty close to that a couple of times - and thought I was hot stuff until someone asked me why I needed 736k to run an application that could only address 640k ;-)

    But - this was back in the days when I quad-booted OS/2, a Win95 beta, Windows 3.1 and a RedHat distrubution just because I could. I finally outgrew that phase and understand that people with multiboot machines have way too much time on their hands ;-)

    --
    we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
    -- anais nin
  228. OT: Your flights .sig by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I tried your Euro Unbiased Flights Search Engine. All I can get from it is lists of flights, linked to airline queries by null URLs. Like "London Heathrow to Madrid 7/16/05 return 7/17/05", and all others.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:OT: Your flights .sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for letting me know! it must have been like that for ages! anyhow it seems to be okay now!

      Nick...

    2. Re:OT: Your flights .sig by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It does now link the airline in the flight detail report to the airline's homepage. Can you hook it up so that link is a URL-encoded query to the airline's database? So rather than my manually reading the flight detail, making a note, then requerying from the homepage (in each one's peculiar form) for the confirmed flight info (and fare), I can just click the flight detail you provide, and get the final info I need?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  229. how to kill it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm. they are using Linux.
    Then killing it will be easy:

    killall -9 OS/2

  230. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    My Dad used to work in the British Air Force, where some officers would routinely refer to "Standard SOP Operating Procedures".

    Go on, guess what SOP stands for :)

    (And then there was the Squadron Leader who demonstrated how to jump out of a troop carrier when the safety harness cable wasn't attached, but I digress...)

  231. PM becoming OSS? by TicTacTux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe we finally see the OS/2 Presentation Manager going Open Source and be ported to *X?

    Hmm, okay, yet another GUI framework. I guess IBM should've done this five years ago.

    --
    Use The Source, Luke!
  232. Thats nothing by XSforMe · · Score: 1

    At my bank, they still use OS/2 at the desktop, along with a combination of office 97. It is truly a retro experience when I have to do any banking over there!

    --
    My other OS is the MCP!
  233. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by jwhyche · · Score: 0

    just post your pin and account number here. We'll help you keep up with it.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
  234. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, what if you go to the ATM machine at the La Brea tar pits? (The the tar tar pits.)

  235. coincidence? by blair1q · · Score: 1

    I think it was almost exactly ten years ago that I purchased the only retail copy of OS/2 available in Phoenix, tried to install it, watched it go tits-up, and returned it for a full refund.

    It was an open-box sale, so clearly someone else had done the same, and no doubt someone did so afterwards.

    So, the question is, was there ever more than one copy available, anywhere?

  236. doing whats not best for the customer (not!) by bored · · Score: 1

    Its nice and all that IBM recommends linux. Which is probably a good idea for people mad about their closed source operating system being discontinued. On the other hand it doesn't really address any of the real issues. First like it or not, OS/2's API's are a lot closer to windows than they are to linux. If I had some huge application I wrote for OS2 I probably wouldn't just up and rewrite it in java unless I wanted to spend a lot of money. Instead I would try to port it to the closest supported OS. In this case that is probably W2003/Embedded/etc. While M$ may screw you left and right, they probably won't be dropping support for windows anytime in the near future.

  237. OS/2 Saved me from Win 3.1 & Win95/98 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am proud to have never run any of the DOS-based Windows versions (3.1, 95, or 98) on my primary machine.

    I bought my first computer when I started grad school in 1992. Having used Macs, DOS-only PCs, Windows 3.0, and an IBM VM/CMS mainframe, it was clear to me that I did NOT, NOT want to run Windows! OS/2 offered Mac-like OO interface combined with the cheap hardware and all the software compatibility of a PC. And did indeed run Windows apps better than windows. And OS/2 came with REXX, which was a language I knew well from my mainframe work... ;)

    From 1992 until 1999 I ran OS/2. At that point the inability to run Win32 apps was getting intolerable, so I switched to NT 4.0. That was about as reliable as OS/2 but with a much worse GUI. It wasn't until Windows 2000 that MS finally released something that beat OS/2 3.0.

    Every time I had to use a DOS/Win system, I thanked Big Blue for giving us an alternative!

  238. Liquid Crystal Diode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, there are Liquid Crystal Diode displays. I'm sure you already know LED doesn't stand for Light Emitting Display.

    Funny nonetheless.

  239. GNU tools by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Yes, I remember using them ("EMX"?) back in the mid-90's, and, being a long-time Unix-fan, was really impressed. There was a GUI debugger ("PMgdb"?) that was really nice, but I found a bug in it. After emailing the author, he sent me a fixed version within 24 hours. That was my first experience with open-source, and I was extremely impressed.

  240. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wide migration? If OS/2 was still widely used it wouldn't be dead. A few ATM and PBX systems still use it but it's hardly in wide use anymore.

  241. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they run on AC current?

  242. Re: I'm dying!!! by nytes · · Score: 1

    Even worse - it's IBM that's killing you.

    You should contact the police. Or maybe hole-up in your house with an AK47 and shoot anything that moves. Or maybe both.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  243. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, do people understand you when you say you're going to the AT Machine?

    Only if he owes them money.

  244. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > OS/2 may not show the BSOD, but it does crash from time to time. Even in ATMs

    I have seen an ATM crash and show some OS/2 logo

  245. database by edsonmedina · · Score: 0

    Anybody with a PIN number goes to an ATM machine.
    Some of them have LCD Displays


    Yeah, running over RDBM databases.

  246. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally when I go to the ATM, I fear the BSOZ.

    You know, the Blue Screen Of Zeros, which details the amount of... money in each of... my accounts... Nooooooooo !


    That's not too bad. You only have to look at three numbers per account - 0.00

    Think of all the numbers Bill Gates has to look at. I bet he gets dizzy.

  247. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

    Spanish speakers save crap and just "cajero" (teller).

    --
    I see 57005 people
  248. Bank machines ATMs by dindi · · Score: 1

    I think/heard that lots of ATMs and banking applications still used os/2 (well a few years ago I guess) and have a feeling that they do not switch OS every year on an ATM do they ?

    Well i guess I gave it up now, but for the last few years I wanted to build a retro machine with os/2 installed, just could not get the installer anywhere here :(

    I ran a BBS on it for years, and basically anything until i siwtched to linux.

    I just loved OS/2 :( it is a shame.

  249. Re:What is a pre-emptive multitasking operating sy by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    and in windows 95 and 98 (never used me but i presume its the same) a rouge win16 app could bring down the user interface. Sure some 32 bit stuff might keep running but its little use if the GUI is dead.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  250. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, then take out $40 dollars.

  251. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

    The OS/2 distro is called eComstation and is run by a different company.

    --
    US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  252. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people in other parts of the world don't even call them that. They're called 'cashpoints'.

    Imagine that, there's a world outside the US borders.

  253. OS/2: dead again by slapout · · Score: 1

    I like the headlone The Register used on its article: OS/2: dead again.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/07/15/os2_dead_a gain/

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  254. Tholen rules! by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Heh heh. :-)

    Or was that Tholenbot? I don't remember anymore...

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    1. Re:Tholen rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you remember is irrelevant.

  255. The WPS originated with OS/2 2.0 in 1992. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    OS/2 Warp was the third major 32-bit release from IBM.

    OS/2 2.0 was the first 32-bit release of OS/2, and the one that started gaining popularity in the PC hobbyist community. It had the WorkPlace Shell from IBM, the MVDM (Multiple Virtual DOS Machine) subsystem that made it so good at running DOS programs, and WinOS2 (the Windows 3.x subsystem that could poke holes in the PM desktop and run OS/2 and Windows programs together "seamlessly".

    OS/2 2.1 (1993) introduced a Windows 3.1-compatible WinOS2 (the WinOS2 in OS/2 2.0 only did Windows 3.0), and OS/2 Warp 3.0 (1994) introduced dial-up TCP/IP networking (SLIP and PPP) in the box as well as a graphical web browser (the original IBM Web Explorer).

    The OS/2 Warp 3.0 "Connect" variant introduced NIC support and peer-to-peer network support in the box, and IBM released OS/2 Warp 4.0 in 1996 with all of that networking stuff (and two browsers) as part fo the standard package.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  256. In other news... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    In other news, IBM will finally update their system clocks on their Executives' PCs to reflect the fact that it's now 2005 and not 1995.

    Unfortunately, because it's OS/2, it took 20 minutes to do, and the computer crashed 3 times. The executives, who have a typical IBM attention span, decided it would be more efficient to just continue providing OS/2, and that it would be too confusing to switch to "Not having OS/2".

    However, this IS IBM... so, in about 3 years, they'll wake up and go "Oh, right, I was going to cancel OS/2".

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  257. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by kriston · · Score: 1

    Truthfully, the "NT" really stood for "N-Ten" which was the name of the processor for which they originally wrote Windows NT.

    Marketing calls it "New Technology," though.

    --

    Kriston

  258. FWIW, PC/GEOS (GeoWorks) also worked that way. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    In the normal GeoManager, one would use the left mouse button to rubber-band-select the files to copy or move, and then use the right button to perform the actual copy/move operation.

    It seems like Windows was the odd man out when it came to the assigned use of mouse buttons, at least in the x86 world in the early 1990's. :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  259. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Yay+Frogs · · Score: 1

    > Anybody with a PIN number goes to an ATM machine. Some of them have LCD Displays Do any of them have NIC cards?

  260. Officially, no. Unofficially, there's Odin. by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Odin's Win32 support works well enough for me to get my old Palm m105 data (and PalmPix data) transferred back and forth under OS/2 via the Win32 version of Palm Desktop 3.0, and it also runs Adobe Acrobat 4.0 and the latest IrfanView fairly well (a few glitches in things like video and thumbnail creation, but it mostly works).

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  261. Re:Actually.... banks still use it by Bellesarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Banks still use OS/2 in lots of their infrastructure because it's fast and rock solid stable. It's well supported, in fact several very large banks still use os/2 as the backbone infrastructure for their ATM networks.

    I wish IBM would port OS/2 to either Xen or build a compatibility layer to run on top of linux. Then os/2 customers could gradually move to Linux without having to recode their programs.

    I use Os/2 2.11 desktops in 1992-1995 exclusively to run my IT department with Novell servers for filesharing. It was so FAR ahead of windows, it took M$ until 1997 to catch up with os/2 feature-wise and until 1999 to catch up stability-wise.

    M$ only coded a small portion of OS/2, and they still retain rights to the core lanman networking components and parts of various subsystems. M$ consistently torpedoed IBMs' attempts to broaden interest or even opensource components because of the original ill fated deal. Too bad, Windows could have had a serious competitor. Instead thanks to intrigue, infighting and mishandling, OS/2 has been relegated to the dustbin. Sigh. Thanks Bill.

  262. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Bellesarius · · Score: 1

    Many point of sale solutions use OS/2 also. Many mobil stations use OS/2 as their POS operating system. Pound for pound it's a very powerful, balls to the wall fast(it was fast on a Pentium 60, imangine it running on a P4!), has excellent networking and WAN/LAN, etc.. links and has a very rich feature set. But it is old and fairly stagnant. I suspect it's probably better as an semi-embedded OS than windows, but most people these days have no clue about os/2, so they don't use it.

  263. Petition to ask IBM to give it away? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    IBM may not be able to make it free-and-open-source, but nothing says they can't strip out the royalty-bearing parts and give it away.

    A good timetable is 5 years after the official end of service for non-server systems, 10 years for server systems.

    Even better, immediately give a distribution license to a non-profit for ALL versions that aren't currently being sold "new" by anyone else and let them charge just enough to cover royalties, the cost of royalty-related paperwork, and media. For non-servers this should be Almost Zero. If you want hpfs386 with your Warp Server 3, you have to pay so Redmond will get its royalty check.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  264. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by freqres · · Score: 1

    Just hook up an old Atari laptop with a cable attached to your card and the ATM will tell you what your pin number is.

    --
    Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
  265. Threads? Smalltalk! by lrucker · · Score: 1
    I also don't recall a single native OS/2 program that used threads as effectively as they could have been used

    Smalltalk did!

    I should know, I wrote the ParcPlace OS/2 VM.

  266. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

    OS/2 wasn't immune to the BSOD. The only difference was that in its version the "B" stood for "black". It still crashed reasoably often, although not nearly as often as Windows did at the time. Not sure how it compares to current versions of Windows, as it's been a while since I've used OS/2.

    --
    ... I'm addicted to placebos
  267. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and using a NIC card

  268. Where is OS/3? by SagaLore · · Score: 0

    I'm still waiting for OS/3 to come out.

  269. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're talking about the T-Rex. Its OS is z/OS (which is OS/390 to you folks who haven't kept up, or OS/360 for those folks who haven't bothered to look outside for the past 20 years).

    A fair number of IBM's GUIs look like OS/2 because that was the basis of the internal UI guidelines for years. Certainly CMVC is still very OS/2-like in appearance (if not in stability), even though it's been available on other OSes for several years. But most applications from IBM that use those internal UI guidelines are not actually OS/2 under the hood, and don't have any shared code.

    Regardless of the snideness regarding mainframes, IBM makes quite a fair chunk of change on them. Some number of ATMs might've used OS/2 as their frontend, but the'yre almost universally IMS on the backend (with possibly a DB2 UDB for z/OS involved somewhere, but IMS is faster than DB2z, so it's more popular for something like an ATM). It's fair to say that if you're using an ATM, you're using IMS somewhere.

  270. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, it really stood for "nice tits" because the programmers loved a good set of breasts.

    Hey, my statement is as well supported as yours.

  271. First Grid Computing System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the mid-nineties, there was an application framework aimed at financial institutions that would use OS/2 clients after-hours to perform deriviative calculations, among other things.
    If only Enron had a Beowulf cluster of these...

    Rick DeBay

  272. SMP scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day, just before the SMP version was released it was tested at a vendor that had an 16 CPU computer (I think it was Compaq, and it was only for research and never released). OS/2 scaled consistently at 80% per CPU.

    Rick DeBay

  273. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "AC coward"

    and a redundant one as well. :P

  274. GUI is unimportant by krischik · · Score: 1

    The GUI of an ATM is only the very smallest part of it - There is special hardware for the card and the money dispensor to be run.

    Resistance angainst any for of failure and exploits is more important. A python hacker would not have a clue about the complexity of the needed transaction security when one doshes our real money. No mistake neither in favour of the bank nor in favour of the customer is allowed.

    Banks have own test teams - just to make shure that is works.

    Don't get me wrong: You can use Wx/python to implement - but you need real software engeneers to do it - and not just 1 python guy with UI experience.

    On a side note: I allways thought that in programming language comparison not the ability of the language is important but the ability, skill and experience of the average programmer using that language. The old saying holds true: Real programmers can programm Fortran in any language.

    1. Re:GUI is unimportant by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      python hacker would not have a clue about the complexity of the needed transaction security when one doshes our real money. No mistake neither in favour of the bank nor in favour of the customer is allowed.

      How is this different than any other two-phase commit system?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  275. What a pity by bbabiuk · · Score: 1

    Too bad. I have fond memories of OS/2. I was a 2.x user, of course Warp, and then 4.0 user. Oh well.

  276. commit by krischik · · Score: 1

    The money part: You need to track if the customer got his money and - in the event of a crash - decide on roll foreward or roll back is needed.

    Ahh, and don't forget the special hardware needed to dosh out the money. And the one for the card.

    All I want to make clear is that it is not a "1 python hacker" job. Which reminds me: when cash-money is involved then you need 4-eys anyway.

    Shows the OP had no idea at all about how software developmend at banks is done.

    1. Re:commit by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The money part: You need to track if the customer got his money and - in the event of a crash - decide on roll foreward or roll back is needed.

      Any transactional system will handle that. Two-phase commit handles it in the case where there is more than one database being modified. Sure, it's important in banking, but it's also very important in medical, transportation, and many other businesses and research. I didn't get why someone who hacks in python wouldn't understand this.

      Ahh, and don't forget the special hardware needed to dosh out the money. And the one for the card.

      So are you suggesting these aren't COTS parts? I ordered a card reader off of eBay to find out, but it looks like they're RS232 devices. I was assuming the bill vendors are similarly interfaced but haven't confirmed that.

      All I want to make clear is that it is not a "1 python hacker" job. Which reminds me: when cash-money is involved then you need 4-eys anyway.

      Clearly. This is a project that needs doing. It's close to impossible to do any project with 1 man. A prototype maybe, but almost never a project. With the OSS model one might get a hundred guys working on it.

      Shows the OP had no idea at all about how software developmend at banks is done.

      Yes, that was me and that's why I asked for the input from someone in the know (re-read for confirmation). But I still have no idea what makes this development special other than 'a python hacker wouldn't understand transactional systems''. I'm still interested in knowing.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re: commit by krischik · · Score: 1

      > I ordered a card reader off of eBay to find out,
      > but it looks like they're RS232 devices.

      Indeed often they are. Sometimes they are daisy chained into the keyboard. Which reminds me: The ATM's I have seen from the inside are dual display / dual keyboard. If you open them from the back there is a full pc monitor, keyboard and a mouse for maintanance. Any yes they where all OS/2 as well.

      > With the OSS model one might get a hundred guys working on it.

      In a cash-money project the test team tends to be as large as the developer team - and they have a test plan - and special toy money to test the dispensor. Actualy: The banks won't trust anybody apart from there own staff (or in house freelancers) on testing that stuff.

      Shure the hardware vendor must have a test plan as weöö - but then is it's double checked.

      > what makes this development special

      Well indeed it is normal software engeneering - which could partialy done with python - but not code hacking. The main difference is in the culture: non disclosure contracts, test plans, code review.

  277. Re:Q: Why kill OS/2? A: Support Costs. by mink · · Score: 1

    IBM is willing to support OS/2 for as long as customers pay for support.
    Beyond that there is Serenity Systems and the OS/2 version they sell called Ecomstation that for instance can install from CD Boot and use LVM/JFS2
    Windows still won't give you anything more then basic mirroring in a non server OS.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  278. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ATM at my bank blue screens occasionally, and it runs NT 4.0 (Wells Fargo).

  279. Re:Won't somebody please think of the ATM machines by UnTdWrLdGv · · Score: 1

    Around here we call them TYME machines. You should see the way people looked at me when I first went looking for a TYME machine outside of my home city. One of my friends asked me what year I was headed for.

    TYME is a branded ATM, which I believe stands for Take Your Money Everywhere. Where I came from, the brand became synonymous with ATMs, like Kleenex is for facial tissue.

    Ask someone where the nearest TYME machine is located, its a great conversation starter!

  280. Adieu, OS/2? by SassyOS2 · · Score: 1
    "Help Desk" cartoon(18 July 2005) from Chris Wright:
    We don't NEED IBM to use OS/2
    :)