Slashdot Mirror


Sony Describes DS As Gimmick

1up.com has news, via MCVUK, that PSP VP of Studios Phil Harrison has classified Nintendo's entry into the handheld market as 'irrelevant'. From the article: "The idea of a handheld rivalry with Nintendo is an irrelevance...Those formats don't appear in our planning. It's not a fair comparison; not fair on them, I should stress. That sounds arrogant, maybe, but it's the truth." 1up.com's commentary is well seen. From their piece: "Whether or not you fully agree, Nintendo DS can come off as gimmicky, but Sony's commentary is fairly strange." Read on for my own short commentary. I know that, for the most part, comments like Harrisons are just the marketing version of "my processor is faster than yours" but I'm honestly surprised at the level of arrogance displayed there. Since the PSP's launch, Slashdot Games has posted article after article with titles like PSP Reception Lukewarm in U.S., PSP Not A Sellout Hit, What's Up With The PSP?, and most recently PSP Usage Lower Than Expected. This last article is especially disheartening for Sony execs because those numbers come from Japan, a nation that has traditionally been Sony's bread basket. If it's not doing well here, and it's not doing well there...do they really think that many Europeans are going to buy it when it launches there next week?

453 comments

  1. Sorny doesn't like the DS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Go figure.

    1. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by typical · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that Sony has anything new to say. It's that articles like "emacs sucks", "Linux sucks", or "the DS sucks", no matter how stupid, redundant, and uninformative, are absolutely certain to generate comments (which will be similarly stupid, redundant, and uninformative).

      What this means is that the Slashdot editors couldn't find a single story of more content among every submission from all the Slashdot readers.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    2. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by tivoKlr · · Score: 1
      Well, it is a Friday, isn't it? At least in the western hemisphere it still is.

      It typically seems like submissions and story publication tapers off on Friday afternoon and is thin all weekend then bounces back on Mondays.

      Just my perception, I know...

      --
      Ocean is land, covered with water.
    3. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by Afrosheen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The editors were much too busy rejecting interesting, informative, stimulating posts from it's non-paying members and hunting for the Next Big Dupe.

        Editors aside, articles like this one are written for one thing and one thing only: to generate hits. Why do you think fuckin' Dvorak is still writing a column this late in the game? Because his flamebait, trolling articles generate hits. I'm sure he gets absolutely pounded by email each time he takes the wrong side of a hard line on issues, and that pays the bills. His expertise in the industry is quickly fading into irrelevance. An old man in an industry moving this quickly has a very hard time making insightful observations, but drive-by criticisms and fanciful, pulled-out-of-his-ass predictions are a no brainer.

        To avoid calling the kettle black, I'll state for the record that my post just might be stupid, redundant, and uninformative. :)

    4. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by l3ert · · Score: 1

      To avoid calling the kettle black, I'll state for the record that my post just might be stupid, redundant, and uninformative. :)

      Yep but it's also interesting and a bit insightful.

      --
      per dolorem ad astra
    5. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "To avoid calling the kettle black, I'll state for the record that my post just might be stupid, redundant, and uninformative. :)"

      Thus insuring that it will get moderated to +5, Interesting.

    6. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of his posts get modded up because he's usually right. Check his stats.

    7. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by empaler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Most posts bearing a disclaimer like that get modded up. Also the ones that have similar things, like "This'll kill my karma" or "I like traffic lights".

      This'll definitely kill my karma.

    8. Re:Sorny doesn't like the DS? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      And what is it that people here want? Seriously, do we want to go through mountains of demographic data on the "teen and young adult market," sales projections, business plans, and marketing tactics of the PSP and the DS.

      Its the back and forth arguments, the polarized views, the outrage, etc that bring people here. This is what passes for ordinary discourse and considering the popularity of the site, well, you tell me what people -really- want.

  2. Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Zangief · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is why the PSP, the superior product, is outselling the DS worldwide...

    Wait a minute...

    1. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Rirath.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People don't always buy the superior product over a more popular, but lesser one.

      See, for example, the continued success of The Sims and it's many, many expansions over far better games.

    2. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But... the PS2 will be able to do Final Fantasy movie level graphics! The PS3 is equal to 8 supercomputers! Killzone is a Halo killer! The E3 graphics aren't pre-rendered, they'll look just like that in the game! ATRAC sounds better than CDs! Memory Stick is the best memory format! Betamax is superior to VHS! Sony wouldn't lie to me!

    3. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the superior but less sucessful product in the doll-house space?

    4. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty shure the grand parent was a "joke".

    5. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by earnest+murderer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the superior but less sucessful product in the doll-house space? Singles? No. Until I can trap a woman I've "molested" in a room with no doors and thus foil the authorities it will never be able to compete.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    6. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the superior but less sucessful product in the doll-house space?



      Actual, real doll houses and dolls?

    7. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a market for that?

    8. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      as a video student i will tell you betamax IS superior to VHS. in fact it has separate tracks for luminance and color information, which when used with an s-video cable is sent directly down the cable to your TV without any modification whatsoever.

      When viewed this way, Betamax rivals many DVDs produced at home (esp. those done on cheap software for windows). So as far as a home recording format Betamax was far ahead of VHS. Way better.

    9. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by tepples · · Score: 1

      there's a market for [actual doll houses]?

      Mattel seems to think so: see its Loving Family and Barbie product lines.

    10. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you consider 8 Pentium 3 800 mhz super computers.

    11. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm there, Chief. That's what that post was.

    12. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Sure you're not confusing Betamax and Betacam ?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    13. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by eMartin · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Betacam SP. Not Betamax.

      Betamax SP is very high quality, and is still very much in use today. Betamax is not.

      The cassette looks similar though.

    14. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Merlyn+MacGreine · · Score: 0

      For further example, see Macintosh vs. Windows

      --
      ~Merlyn
    15. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not to sure of the future of the DS but one thing Sony needs to remember is Nintendo has dominated the hand held market for over 10 years. The PSP maybe a superior product but the smart money is on the DS.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    16. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Zediker · · Score: 0

      yes, exactly. Everyone remember the gamegear. Sure it was pritty and vastly superior to the gameboy. But it was expensive and ate batteries, and thus was doomed to fail... wait... the PSP is expensive and eats battery power... hrm..... coincidence... time will tell...

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    17. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Macintosh is a computer while Windows is an OS.

    18. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was up at camp with a friend and he said he Dr. put him on beta blockers. Perhaps Sony needed a VHS blocker and a nintendo blocker.

    19. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      In defense of the PSP(not Sony), part of that is that the release dates for the PSP have been fucked up royally. There is a market there(as evidened by all the grey market importation Sony has been trying to stop), but they couldn't or wouldn't meet the demand themselves and wouldn't let anyone else do it either.

      A lot of people can only really afford one handheld device and the DS is there to buy and the PSP wasn't, and in some cases I believe still isn't.

    20. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      Yeah except people dont buy macs to run windoze on. (Yes I know, linux geeks buy macs to run linux on, but any linux geek worth his name can make it run on virtually any hardware so they dont count in this argument)

    21. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      >What's the superior but less sucessful product in the doll-house space? Sim vs FPS/RPG/ETC is not a direct comparison, fair enough, but nether is a DS vs a PSP. They target different audiences completely, when you get right down to it. When looking at pure sales figures though, as the original poster was jesting over, popularity rarely defines superiority.

      As for the sim market, I'd take good old Simcity 3000 any day. (Simcity if you're die hard oldschool, or Sim City 4 if you prefer.)

    22. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "People don't always buy the superior product over a more popular, but lesser one."

      It's easy to say that, but the truth is that superiority is in the eye of the beholder. The Newton was superior to the Palm Pilot, right? Nope. The Palm Pilot was seriously smaller, cheaper, and it had a much better battery life. For a significant number of people, it was a much better buy despite being 'inferior'.

      The PSP seemed plenty superior to me until I sat through a couple of loading screens on it. For nearly double the price, I get slightly nicer graphics and games that take longer to load. Wee.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      The PSP will be out here in 5 more days, and at this point, I can honestly say that if I did have $425 to spare, I would rather buy two DS units and a DS game, and have three player gaming with friends, than but one PSP unit and not find anyone to play against for the next year until the price becomes acceptable.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    24. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by mog007 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't need a video game to do that...

      Hang on, I have to assure the authorities that I have no idea where Cindy is.

    25. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for the sim market, I'd take good old Simcity 3000 any day. (Simcity if you're die hard oldschool, or Sim City 4 if you prefer.)

      Actually my favorite SimCity was 2000 (though the SNES version of SimCity would be a close 2nd). 2000 added things to the game to make it better and more enjoyable to me. 3000 and later added stuff that just seemed to make the game more tedious and frustrating.

    26. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Trepalium · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The gamegear was expensive to buy, and expensive to operate. At the time of the GG, you had the choice between disposable alkaline batteries, or rechargable nickel cadmium batteries. Unfortunately, NiCads were typically underpowered, provided poor battery life and needed to be replaced quite frequently. The result was you had to pay a lot just to play the darn thing.

      The PSP has entered a slightly different environment. The proliferation of cellular phones, PDAs, laptops, and digital cameras has forced the costs of producing nickel metal hydride and lithium ion batteries down. For $20-$30, you can pick up a set of NiMH batteries and a charger. The price of keeping the device powered becomes far less of a problem this time around.

      On the other hand, the PSP could easily fail because it has a pretty lousy line-up of games available, and, of course, because it's expensive. I think battery consumption problem is pretty minor these days.

      --
      I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
    27. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by rohlfinator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Batteries might not be the issue here, although the PSP's battery life seems to be less than ideal.

      The thing that makes the PSP expensive to operate is the use of Sony's memory format. A Memory Stick Pro Duo seems to cost (on average) about twice as much as a comparitively sized CF or SD card. While that's not a big deal on its own, the PSP's disc-based design forces consumers to buy memory cards in order to save games. In addition, since the PSP is being touted as a multimedia machine, it can be expected that many people will want bigger memory cards to store movies and music.

      The DS, on the other hand, has free save space included with each game. If people want to use the multimedia features of the GBA Movie Player or Play-Yan, they can use the cheaper (and more standard) SD and CF cards. So while batteries may not be a big issue, the PSP introduces a new problem that may be even more expensive, depending on the case.

    28. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does it matter either way? I have yet to see ANY evidence that mac os is better than windows, and it certainly has less software support. But then again, I've only used the stupid things.

      A Linux desktop on the other hand does have a number of excellent advantages. Commercial software support in the non-high end arena just doesn't happen to be one.

      So can we please stop these posts about about mac being better than windows. Neither is anywhere near an optimal desktop environment, both are expensive (at least windows runs on cheap hardware, and by cheap I mean REALLY cheap). Sure a mac might be easier the very first time someone sits down at the computer (this can only happen once unless you get brain severely brain damaged), and even this is a pretty weak argument, but after that first sit down it becomes quickly apparent how crippled the mac ui is.

      Windows is of course moving more and more in the same direction and dumbing down computer users more every day.

      Fanbois: mac is NOT better than windows. There is no evidence that such is the case beyond anecdotal evidence from people who use macs first. It's time for you to come up with something more solid than "mac is better because it's mac".

    29. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I'm not a fan of The Sims myself (only played/watched the first part for a few minutes), but I don't think your statement makes sense :

      There is no other game like The Sims that is as good as it is in that genre.
      You might not personally like it, but you got to give it some credit in capturing alot of people's attention (ifnot only for it being a game which alot of women play).

    30. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original post was a litany of the numerous techologies Sony has pushed that have ultimately failed in the marketplace. Sony's Betamax lost the battle with VHS.

    31. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by The+Tyrant · · Score: 1

      I wasnt advocating either macOS or windoze. I've not used macs enough to really comment, however Im gettting really pissed off with windoze, but, yeah, was simply pointing out that you can compare apples to oranges in this case, just about.

    32. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The Something Awful article suggests that you can wall in the people in Singles but they don't die.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    33. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Belgand · · Score: 1

      The Game Gear actually released a rechargeable battery brick to help counteract this problem. Yes, it made it a bit more cumbersome to carry around, but quite frankly it made the system work out very well whenever I would take it on trips.

    34. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Superior is not defined by a more powerful processor /better graphics /more features alone.

      The DS for example is of far better build quality , has more games that are suited to mobility ,better battery life , a touch screen...

      I own both and my PSP is busy collecting dust .. the only game i will buy for it in the next 6 months or so (as far as i can tell right now .. things may change) is GTA liberty city stories and have only purchased 1 game for it .
      where as i have purchased 5-6 games for the DS and about 8 Gameboy advanced games over the last 6 months, I also intend to purchase a few before Christmas .anecdotal evidence i know , though I also know a fair few other people in the same position .

      In the console market , the superior product is the one with the superior games.

      Take the PS2's position in the market right now , it is by far the weakest console , (discounting handhelds , though even the PSP is more powerful in a few regards)yet it is pulverising the competition

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    35. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The DS sold only one million during that timespan in Europe. Might be related to the lack of games (the big titles like Kirby and Meteos aren't out here yet) or maybe people are just waiting for that Playstation Portable that "plays PS2 games and DVDs" (had to set a coworker straight on that one, afterwards he no longer wanted a PSP). Perhaps DS sales will go up when the PSP actually arrives and the people here get their share of realizing that Sony overhyped, too.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    36. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by ninjakoala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. I agree that these issues are very important on a portable machine. Some people who commute by train a lot may enjoy a PSP, since loading times will be fairly irrelevant. But from my perspective it's all about: is it easy to take with me? Can I start a game in a couple of seconds and end them just as quickly if something pops up? Are the games designed to be played on the road, or do they require your full attention for hours on end?

      I'm usually quite busy, so I have too little time for my consoles and the DS fits the gap very well. If I'm going somewhere for a week I'll charge it and don't have to worry about bringing the charger, because it will have enough power. Heck, it can even have a couple of anime episodes on the movie advance if I feel like it, even though I'd rather watch movies on a laptop or a TV (which is also a reason why the PSP isn't all that interesting for me even if the screen is super sweet when you find one without dead pixels).

      The SEGA Nomad was one sexy piece of hardware (even if more than a tad on the big side), but since the games for it were just Genesis/MegaDrive games, it wasn't very practical to have on the road - even if you ignore the ridiculous battery consumption on it. It seems to me a lot of the games that are touted for the PSP fall into the same category: Ridge Racers, Wipeout, Grand Theft Auto. I'm sure they're all fine games like their PS2 brethren, but they aren't particularly well suited for a quick pick-up-and-play imho. I have a couple of racing games on the DS, and I usually have to race a couple of laps to get "into the groove" before I can take on the higher levels, so it's more than just the time to actually finish a race that's required. Therefore I usually take other games with me if I'm on the go, but where are those pick-up-and-play games on the PSP right now? Or even in the near future?

      --
      Against the grain
    37. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by ninjakoala · · Score: 1

      There was one for Nomad too. I wish I had it. Of course I'd need a separate backpack to have both the Nomad and the rechargable battery pack (and the original one that took standard AA batteries). Maybe I'd need two backpacks on second thought...

      --
      Against the grain
    38. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Echnin · · Score: 1

      Such as the PS2?

      --
      Lalala
    39. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac OS is better than Windows. Apple hardware is better than 97% of the crap you can run Windows on. I hadn't used a Mac till a year ago, I had been using DOS, Windows, UNIX and GNU/Linux systems till then. Mac OS X is superior to any other system as a general-purpose computing platform.

    40. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      allot = VALID
      a lot = VALID
      alot = INVALID

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    41. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Destoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'll change my sig in the next few years, for sure..

      uh oh.. I think I had a bet with someone for my sig for some time. I'll need to verify who won..

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    42. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't, no it isn't, no you didn't, and no it isn't.

    43. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Yeah.... and ummm.... Civics are better than Maseratis because they sell more right? What was your sarcastic point here?

    44. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      It's funny to read this now, because when the PSP was about to launch there were so many people going on about how Nintendo was screwed, and how they were going to have their last big market taken away from them. Could have been true, too, if Sony had concentrated on games rather than all the other shit the PSP can do.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    45. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Mome · · Score: 1

      "See, for example, the continued success of The Sims and it's many, many expansions over far better games."

      What "far better games" do you want these people to be buying?

      Games where you shoot zombies? Again?

      Or games where you shoot ripoffs of Geiger's Alien ? Again?

      Or games where you storm Omaha Beach? Again?

      Tolkien Derivative Fantasy RPG #3750?

      Blowing Shit Up X-Treme 2005?

      Crappy Movie License: The Game?

      The PC game industry makes about 5 different games, over and over and over. And most of the people I know who love the Sims don't happen to give a rat's ass about those 5 games, no matter how great the lighting is or how realistic the blood splatter physics are or how many vehicles you can drive.

      They tend to be pretty happy about the Nintendogs or Katamari Damancy's of the world, but those quirky games tend to be console/portable titles. On the PC side? The Sims. What else is there for them (aside from Popcap/Yahoo Games stuff, which is also hugely popular)?

    46. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Tuna · · Score: 1

      We can all think of examples of where the more technically advance product never had the market share like a less sophisticated competitor did.

      Atari 2600/VCS vs. Intellivision
      Commodore 64 vs. Atari 8-bit

      These are the two that come to my mind. I had both the Intellivision and Atari 8-bit computers growing up but my friends with the 2600/C64 always had a better selection of software/hardware.

      Tuna

      --
      Just when it's idiot proof, someone builds a bigger idiot.
    47. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    48. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Completely off topic, but what do those 88's bracketing your nick stand for?

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    49. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Completely off topic, but what do those 88's bracketing your nick stand for?

      Some b*stard already registered NoSoup4U ;) And 8 is my favorite number : So it doesn't stand for anything, just making sure that this nick -was- available.

    50. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by KevinKnSC · · Score: 1

      It's about time anonymous coward weighed in and ended that debate once and for all. Thanks!

    51. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      More like the PSX.

    52. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      The one million mark was passed in June. There have been a couple of months since then.

    53. Re:Yeah, it's a gimmick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Costs more, is harder to do anything reasonable with, has restrictive and ugly ui theme, and it's hardware is slow. Yeap, way superior!

  3. they might by peculiarmethod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    when a country is entertained and will readily buy things such as blood pudding, jellied eels, Spotted Dick, liver and lights, and kidney pie, I am willing to wait and SEE if they will buy it, as opposed to assuming I know what they will do.. they've already suprised me in soo many ways.

    I think the psp is great, and I will buy one.. I am just waiting for movies I actually LIKE.. I'm more of an indie / forien flick kinda guy. So x-mas will tell me when or if I should buy.

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    1. Re:they might by gclef · · Score: 1

      Do not taunt the spotted dick. Really. Trust me.

    2. Re:they might by wahsapa · · Score: 1

      sounds like the video-ipod is for you

    3. Re:they might by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

      aren't we meant to call it spotted richard now?

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
    4. Re:they might by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or any other Personal Video Player. The point is, you won't get much indie in UMD and it is going to be much cheaper to buy a large hardrive unit and fill it with fair use DVD rips than to buy every movie twice.

    5. Re:they might by ilyaaohell · · Score: 1

      Do you REALLY think that the PSP, a platform specifically targetted at hip on-the-go teenagers, will have a movie library consisting of something OTHER than blockbusters created for 13-25 year old males? If your decision on buying the PSP is based on it's movie playing capability, I suggest you look into a portable DVD player instead. They're about the same price, usually have a noticibly larger screen, and have a practically limitless DVD library.

      --
      UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    6. Re:they might by Babbster · · Score: 1
      If your decision on buying the PSP is based on it's movie playing capability, I suggest you look into a portable DVD player instead. They're about the same price, usually have a noticibly larger screen, and have a practically limitless DVD library.

      Don't forget the very handy ability to plug any of the portable DVD players into a regular TV and get, in most cases, the same quality as a full-size DVD player. This is yet another reason UMDs are unlikely to gain traction since you can only see those discs on the PSP's tiny screen. I doubt this will change much considering Sony would probably have a hard time selling home UMD players when DVD (as you said) has the vastly superior library, not to mention the fact that Sony has Blu-Ray coming up fast - trying to market two "new" movie formats at the same time is probably going to make the already painful HD-DVD/Blu-Ray situation that much worse...

    7. Re:they might by fbjon · · Score: 1

      UMD-movies certainly feel as gimmicky as prerecorded MD's.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:they might by drsquare · · Score: 1

      when a country is entertained and will readily buy things such as blood pudding, jellied eels, Spotted Dick, liver and lights, and kidney pie

      Why is that surprising? McDonald's makes good business: people will eat anything.

    9. Re:they might by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Except that I wish prerecorded MD's would have won. I would have put up with a little lower sound quality in exchange for not having to worry about scratching the discs all the time. I hope at some time in the future we can move to a more robust media format. They won't be as shiny or cheap, but I'd rather have that anyway.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:they might by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      I think the psp is great, and I will buy one.. I am just waiting for movies I actually LIKE.. I'm more of an indie / forien flick kinda guy. So x-mas will tell me when or if I should buy.

      You think it's great? Try owning one. It's not that great. Granted, it's a marvelous machine and COULD be great. But right now it's about worthless.

      And forget UMDs altogether. The entire concept of a movie on a UMD is absolutely retarded. What I do instead is simply rip movies off of DVD and encode them as MPG, then transfer them over to my 1 gig Memory Stick Duo. The average movie, once converted with good quality down to a size suitable for the PSP, works out to be about 500-700 megs. Less if you drop the frame rate to 15fps or even further yet if you drop the sound quality. 15fps, low bitrate, mono -- you could probably fit a whole movie in under 300 megs.

      Rather than buying UMDs at $25 per pop, I recommend buying a 1 gig memory stick and going with DVDs instead. At least the DVDs can be used anywhere.

      That still doesn't solve the issue with a shortage of good games, though.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  4. Sony Describes DS As Gimmick by springbox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry to point out the obvious but isn't Sony one of Nintendo's competitors in the handheld market? Company A saying bad things to discredit company B? Unheard of!

    1. Re:Sony Describes DS As Gimmick by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me of something my mom asked me about. She wondered, if aspirin can prevent heart attacks, then why do they also say it is bad for you (I don't remember what bad effect she referenced)? I was having to tell her that (besides the occasional good-hearted independent study) there is business involved. I somehow doubt Florida Orange Juice commercials (e.g.) just come on because doctors make them; I'm sure there's some commercial promotion intended too. (That bitch Katrina doesn't help matters there...)

      Cue the Michael Douglas quotes...

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Sony Describes DS As Gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I fear for Sony's future if they think that the 'Best Graphics' is the same as the 'Better System.' To a certain extent I suspect that Sony's lack of managerial depth, and lack of imagination, are really starting to spread into their gaming division. I honestly don't have too much difficulty imagining that the PS2 (PS3 or PS4) may be the last Sony gaming system that anyone buys.

      Now I'm not saying that the PS3 will not be successful but more that there was a time where everyone thought that the only portable CD player worth owning was the Discman, and that the only TV worth owning was a Trinitron; the plague of poor management decisions that has infested Sony will eventually hit their gaming division (and may already have) and it will go downhill too.

    3. Re:Sony Describes DS As Gimmick by Otter · · Score: 1
      She wondered, if aspirin can prevent heart attacks, then why do they also say it is bad for you (I don't remember what bad effect she referenced)? I was having to tell her that (besides the occasional good-hearted independent study) there is business involved.

      This is far less complicated (and sinister) than you're making it out to be. Like every drug, aspirin has benefical effects (pain relief, cardioprotection) and adverse effects (stomach irritation, bleeding). It's not Good or Bad -- you need to balance the benefits and risks.

      It doesn't seem like such a difficult concept to grasp, but you and your mom are far from the only people who can't seem to get it.

  5. 'entry' by EddieBurkett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Erm... the DS is Nintendo's "entry" into the handheld market??? I've got a 15 year old gameboy that says otherwise. (Hell, didn't the old Game & Watches even precede that?)

    --
    The only thing I hate more than hypocrites are people who hate hypocrites.
    1. Re:'entry' by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Informative

      They meant "entry" as in "contest entry," not "initial offering." Nintendo is entering the DS as their contender for this round of handheld game devices.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:'entry' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entry as in one has an entry to a fair or a contest.

    3. Re:'entry' by brandanglendenning · · Score: 1, Funny

      they're totally going to ride the gravitron together!!

    4. Re:'entry' by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Hell, didn't the old Game & Watches even precede that?

      That's not a "handheld" it's a "wrist-carried". :-)

    5. Re:'entry' by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      game & watch wasn't a wrist watch, they were two or three fold lcd games.

      linky!

      --
      Gone!
    6. Re:'entry' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but it said "entry into," which implies "initial offering." If it referred to "contest entry" it should have been "entry in"

    7. Re:'entry' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, where the hell are you from?

      Take anything like that with a grain (or boulder) of salt...

      Please, get a clue huh?

  6. PSP is great by Agret · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the price tag is not

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:PSP is great by prmths · · Score: 1

      That's what I was going to say...
      i cant see myself dishing out $250-$300 for a system... Of course the screen is beautiful, but with threats of dead pixels and broken buttons... I'd definitely expect more... I'm more likely to get another GP32 or a GPX2-F100.. most of the games i'd play are legacy genesis/snes/sms/nes/tg16 games anyways. maybe i'm a bad statistic

    2. Re:PSP is great by MuMart · · Score: 1

      Neither is the battery life.

    3. Re:PSP is great by sigloiv · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I own a Nintendo DS and my friend owns a Sony PSP. They both have their pros and cons. Had the PSP been $50-$100 cheaper I would have bought it anyday over the DS. While I did buy the DS on launch day, knowing the PSP's price ahead of time told me I couldn't afford a PSP when it came out anyways.

      --
      Software is like sex. It's better when it's free. -Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:PSP is great by Rotting · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had a psp and thought it was great... at first. It may sound somewhat foolish but one of the main reasons for me getting rid of it was that it was almost too good. I was always handling it like a baby for fear of wrecking it. I looked beautiful but felt so fragile. Maybe it was just me.

      The other reason I ended up selling it was, and this will sound weak, the fact that it took a long time to load games. If I was playing Ridge Racer and wanted to switch to Tony Hawk it would just take what felt like ages to load. It got to the point where I would just say fuck it and leave the current game in the system.

      These issues don't really bother me at all with the DS that I picked up afterwards. Now if only it had an analog stick... :/

    5. Re:PSP is great by EastCoaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love my PSP. I play it more than I do regular consoles. I am always away from the house so the PSP is perfect. I am loading a ton of Atari 2600 games right as I type this.

    6. Re:PSP is great by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "i cant see myself dishing out $250-$300 for a system... Of course the screen is beautiful, but with threats of dead pixels and broken buttons... I'd definitely expect more..."

      I had a chance to play a PSP the other day. What's the first thing I bumped into? "Loading...." Frankly, that bothers me a hell of a lot more than the thought of a dead pixel or two.

      Sony has a lot of nerve calling anything Nintendo has done with the DS 'gimmicky'. If they had kept the price down, the battery life up, and the load times reasonable, they'd have a lot more room to talk.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:PSP is great by xanatos367 · · Score: 0

      The PSP loading times CAN be pretty bad, and rather frustrating. But one thing the PSP has going for it that the DS does not is the ability to suspend it at essentially any point and turn it back on right where you left off. That helps to mitigate the loading times in that you dont have to wait for the game to load each time you start playing.

      Honestly, I bought my PSP now ONLY because I wanted to get a 1.5 before they had been replaced by 1.51s in the stores so I could do homebrew. I think what Sony really needs to do is GET SOME DEMO UNITS. I don't know anyone personally with a PSP and I hadn't used one before I bought one. If I had played a demo unit I probably would have bought one sooner, and I think the whole "we don't need no demo units" is also part of Sony's arrogance.

    8. Re:PSP is great by Cerberus911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The PSP loading times CAN be pretty bad, and rather frustrating. But one thing the PSP has going for it that the DS does not is the ability to suspend it at essentially any point and turn it back on right where you left off. That helps to mitigate the loading times in that you dont have to wait for the game to load each time you start playing.

      Fold your DS. Now open it again. OMG. Wasn't that something. Now have fun with your newfound knowledge.

    9. Re:PSP is great by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Gameboy SP can suspend/resume too. This is pretty typical of ARM processors. Although the DS's suspend/resume is a lot less work than the old GBA SP's.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    10. Re:PSP is great by Babbster · · Score: 1
      Sony has a lot of nerve calling anything Nintendo has done with the DS 'gimmicky'.

      It's not just Sony. I still see posts by "gamers" deriding the touch screen as a "gimmick." What makes it odd to me is that touch screens have been a fantastic user interface for years now in the PDA market, and it's downright bizarre that anyone who plays games would think that functionality is anything but genius. Not only is it an extremely convenient feature for gamers who've been around the block many times (when the game design is good, of course), but it makes the device that much more accessible to new gamers - no more wondering if 'A' or 'B' is going to activate a particular feature since all you have to do is point the stylus at the screen. Puzzle games (a favorite in this house) in particular benefit immediately from "point and touch."

    11. Re:PSP is great by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Specifically "gamers" should love the touch screen. FFS, it allows "gamers" to play first person shooters on the closest to mouse input currently possible on the portable market.
      Every and I mean every single PC gamer who plays FPSs knows that mouse+keyboard is vastly superior and comfy than keyboard only.
      The stylus+touchscreen gives you just that, free analog input where the rotation speed is defined by the user's input and not constant.

      And that's even ignoring your correct points and the obvious convenience for strategy and puzzle games.

      --
      ^_^
    12. Re:PSP is great by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Aye.
      Nintendo are known for making unbreakable hardware. I've read (I think here on /.) about someone who threw his GC WaveBird through two rooms into a kitchen closet and it only got a bit scratched and was still working, two rooms away. While he just banged his PS2 controller onto the sofa and a visible crack appeared.

      The PSP screen surely looks like it's gonna get very scratched unless you put it in some sort of case, while the DS screens are already clam-shelled.

      Also I've heard of people having their UMD drive already failing on them.

      I'm no Nintendo fanboy, I seriously like the library of the PS1 & PS2, but portables are the one thing Nintendo are unbeatable on. I'm seriously considering buying DS even tho I'm low on cash and know using the stylus will be hard (i'm a lefty).

      I hope the multiplayer aspect will also work well, for both consoles! Hopefully it'll work seamlessly thru open hotspots.

      About the analog stick, imho stylus+touchscreen > analog. For 3D first/third person shooters, the stylus+touchscreen is the closest to mouse input currently available on portables. Maybe for places where you need exact control on your speed an analog stick would be better but I believe a different approach could fix that too.

      --
      ^_^
    13. Re:PSP is great by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it's got Lumines and ummm...

      Emulators... and overpriced movies...

      It doesn't matter if you've got a portable Cray with a blindingly bright XGA screen that gets 800 hours of playtime on fairy dust, if there aren't any good games, it isn't worth buying.

      Nintendo is doing what they always do, putting fun, addictiveness, and play control ahead of all other considerations. As a result they have a "technically inferior" product that is a much greater pleasure to own and use.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    14. Re:PSP is great by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

      For the record, being a lefty will most likely pose no problem for you. All of the DS games I have work just as well with either hand using the stylus because they're either touch screen only or they have a control setting suitable for left-handers.

      I'm not actually left handed myself but my girlfriend is, and she has no problems.

    15. Re:PSP is great by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      How about the thumb strap thing? On the PC I use the right hand for the mouse, but I write using my left so a stylus can suck in the wrong hand.
      I'd rather use the D-Pad and a non-stylus controller than the inverted setup.
      Any luck with that?

      --
      ^_^
    16. Re:PSP is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the DS has no FPSes worth playing - Rogue Agent is allegedly pretty poor, Metroid Hunters isn't out for ages, so that leaves you with a demo. OOoo, isn't that special.
      Same with RTS. The DS would be a good console for them, but nada. Not even Pikmin.

      I'm gonna buy one when Advance Wars DS launches anyway, but I'll probably find it pretty frustrating that there are so many games that should be on it which will never show up. Where's the Quake port? House of the Dead? I can appreciate that they want to be original, but I'd also like to play Cannon Fodder or Wing Commander on the bus.

    17. Re:PSP is great by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      To the AC: Advance Wars for DS is out now. I saw it at the store the other day and lamented my shitty job and lack of money. Age of Empires should be on the way, too, I think.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    18. Re:PSP is great by Wah · · Score: 1

      That's becuase it is in a different class than the DS.

      The DS is irrelevant in the PSP space.

      The one they should be comapred to is Archos and their video players. The PSP is a convergence device, no a gaming machine (well, it does that too).

      Sony just decided to attack the memory angle from the other side than the traditional players have here. Rather than going with a big hard drive, they went with a graphics accelerator.

      This will be made clear when the psp2 comes out in 2009.

      Also, read "Eastern Standard Tripe" and think about the ubiquitos communicators.

      That's the PSP's market. /ramen.

      --
      +&x
    19. Re:PSP is great by Wah · · Score: 1

      errr...

      Tribe, Tribe.

      damn freudian typos.

      --
      +&x
    20. Re:PSP is great by rohlfinator · · Score: 1

      The thumb strap attaches on the right side of the DS, so it might not be long enough to reach your left thumb without detaching it.

      I'd still recommend the stylus for most games, though. My lefty friend had no problem playing Kirby for several hours. And since the buttons are oriented in a diamond pattern, they're easy to use as an alternate d-pad for lefties.

      The thumb strap is mostly useful for games that simulate an analog stick, like Mario 64 and Metroid Prime: Hunters. But for games that require pointing at specific points, like Kirby, Meteos, and Advance Wars, you really need the precision of the stylus.

    21. Re:PSP is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write left-handed and use a mouse right-handed as well. I prefer to use both the stylus and the thumb strap left-handed when playing DS games, and I can testify that all the games I have (seven of them) work fine left-handed.

      The A,B,X,and Y buttons are laid out to mirror the d-pad, and work just fine as a d-pad. Any game that uses the d-pad for important controls (i.e. more than menu navigation) lets you swap the functions to the other side.

      As for the stylus vs. thumbstrap, I find that one or the other is always more suitable for a particular game. The thumbstrap is better for fps (the Metroid demo) and pseudo-analog stick controls (Mario 64) and anything where you have to press buttons a lot, while the stylus is better for anything where you have to look at what you're touching or where you don't use buttons much (all the other games I've played).

    22. Re:PSP is great by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      By an interesting quirk of fate, I went and bought a DS with Advance Wars today.

      Cool game, but the stylus interface for it doesn't buy you a whole lot. It's not that the touch screen is a gimmick, but rather their simple grid like interface that worked quite well on the GBA still works quite well. But, if I were playing it on a table or something I'd prefer the stylus. Tell you what, though, I wouldn't mind a port of StarCraft on this system.

      I also picked up Mario 64. (actually, it came with the system...) It has a mini game with it where you have to 'draw' little circuits to guide a Mario head over to a star. That was cool. I really think that would make for a slick little puzzle game.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:PSP is great by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      Get Kirby's Canvas Curse and you'll see a game that truly uses the touch screen to it's full potential. It's an absolutely fantastic game.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    24. Re:PSP is great by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Will do. Thanks! :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  7. Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Harrison merely said that the DS' touch-screen was a gimmick, not that the DS itself was a gimmick.

    He also said that the DS was not part of Sony's planning as well as it shouldn't be. He believes they're targetting different markets, so why should it?

    Way too much irrelevant Sony hatred. Sony does stupid things, but not everything they do is stupid.

    1. Re:Totally misleading... by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      "Sony does stupid things, but not everything they do is stupid."

      Actually, the case in point is that Sony is ragging on their competitors in a particularly stupid way. If that were the first time, I'd probably think someone just got a little carried away in the "heat" of the interview, but various Sony execs have been bashing their competitors for quite some time now. It's as if they can't give one interview without resorting to bashing others with stuff that's, if not outright lies, but certainly no basis in reality.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    2. Re:Totally misleading... by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      He believes they're targetting different markets

      This is part of his problem. Nintendo and their deveolpers make fun games for all ages (and some are not suitable for children). Sony is ignoring the youth market and saying the markets are entirely different. But ignoring the "safe for youngsters" market doesn't put you in a wholy different market. It simply narrows your scope.

      Thus far it looks a lot like their gaming market is the same as Apple's. That is for people who enjoy playing the same games they played five or six years ago on another platform.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    3. Re:Totally misleading... by paulymer5 · · Score: 1

      Except Apple doesn't make games. Well, Chess.app maybe.

      Microsoft, however, does. And they develop a major gaming platform.

      Which really isn't saying a whole lot, in this case. Trying to compare Sony and Apple about their gaming marketing strategies greatly misses the point, mild attempt at a troll aside.

    4. Re:Totally misleading... by Drakonite · · Score: 1
      ..and Nintendo tends to ignore the fun for mature audiences only market, they also don't cater to the one-device-for-games-and-multimedia-on-the-go market either.

      Sure, there is plenty of overlap, but they aren't going after the same core market.

      Think of it like a corvette and a honda...

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    5. Re:Totally misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Honda? Maybe the NSX? Not much different there. Why are you comparing one care from a major car manufacturer to another whole major manufacturer?

    6. Re:Totally misleading... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      they should go into New York politics

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    7. Re:Totally misleading... by yammosk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or post on Slashdot.

    8. Re:Totally misleading... by KillShill · · Score: 1

      so a member of the RIAA/MPAA does !some! good things...

      such as what?

      --
      Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    9. Re:Totally misleading... by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      I disagree completely with this

      When two products cost a signifigant amount of money and offer similar base capabilities (play games), they may not be in competition with each other, but they are certainly in competition for a customer's money. I am one of the vast minority that can own both a PSP and a DS and purchase games for both of them.

      Most people have a limited budget, and paying $400 for a DS and PSP with only the DS pack-in game to play is not an option.

      Most people are going to get one or the other, and that is competition.

    10. Re:Totally misleading... by LKM · · Score: 1
      Harrison merely said that the DS' touch-screen was a gimmick, not that the DS itself was a gimmick.

      But that's just as stupid. The touch screen isn't any more a gimmick than the analog stick is. It's just another input method, and games like Wario Ware: Touched or Kirby show that it's a valid input method and more than just a gimmick.

    11. Re:Totally misleading... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Harrison merely said that the DS' touch-screen was a gimmick, not that the DS itself was a gimmick.

      He never exactly used the word "gimick" to describe the DS itself, but he implied it quite thoroughly. /. often posts misleading summaries, but this is not one of them.

      He also said that the DS was not part of Sony's planning as well as it shouldn't be. He believes they're targetting different markets, so why should it?

      Now this is really ridiculous! He doesn't just "believe" they are targeting different markets, he reams Nintendo, saying the one people interested in them are Pokemon playing children. /. got this story right. You are the one who is being incredibly misleading.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    12. Re:Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1
      He did use the word gimmick:

      But I fear that it wont have a lasting impact beyond that of a gimmick

      By that he means the touch-screen idea. What I understood of that paragraph is simply that if the DS is only going to market its touch-screen and does not have any other technical merits, its success will be based on that gimmick.

      Indeed. He believes that only kids will like the DS and that Sony is targetting an older market with the PSP. What the deuce is wrong with that? Is targetting children for a gaming platform demeaning somehow?
    13. Re:Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Sony believes its going after one market, and it believes Nintendo is going after another. They base their marketing on that.

      The fact that you can buy both and that in your mind they are competing for your money means absolutely nothing to either company's marketing scheme.

      Put it another way: if you had $400, you could buy 400 bags of chips or 400 cans of soda. But Coke and Doritos are not in competition with each other; they target different markets. Get it?

    14. Re:Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Just as stupid? Perhaps. Did he call the DS itself a gimmick? No.

    15. Re:Totally misleading... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      He did use the word gimmick:

      Completely off the subject. He was calling the DS a gimmick, even though he didn't specifically say the DS is a gimmick.

      Is targetting children for a gaming platform demeaning somehow?

      Saying Nintendo's entire market is: "pretty much defined by a boy or girl's ability to admire Pokémon" is certainly demeaning. That's particularly true considerering that Nintendo controls the entire portables market. Saying that they can only get Pokemon fans to buy their handhelds is not only demeaning, but completely opposite of reality.

      I get the feeling you must work for Sony...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Totally misleading... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think the touch screen is useful and has potential. I played solitaire and Sim City on my recently bought Palm device and the touch screen is IMO the only sensible way to play it on a portable device like that.

      Personally, I'd prefer a single, larger screen with touch screen, but if it were primarily a game system, then I'd save my money by paying 48% less and get the DS.

    17. Re:Totally misleading... by plumby · · Score: 1
      Put it another way: if you had $400, you could buy 400 bags of chips or 400 cans of soda.


      That's a pretty poor analogy. I can't imagine many people wonder whether they should buy a can of soda or a bag of chips. If you are hungry, you have the chips. If you are thirsty, you have the soda. If you are both, you buy both.

      On the other hand, I fancy having a funky new handheld gaming device. I was probably going to get a DS until I saw Pro Evolution Soccer was coming out for the PSP, so I'm buying one of those instead.

      The target audiences are not 100% the same (I suspect Nintendo, as ever, is looking more towards the younger market and with Nintendogs is probably aiming at girls, whereas Sony is looking to target the PSP as more of an all round portable entertainment device for teens and 20-somethings), but there is still a pretty big group of people that could easily have decided to buy either of them, but won't bother buying both.

      For a far better analogy - I work in the credit card industry. Credit cards are a significantly different product to personal loans, but I can absolutely assure you that our marketing department will be actively targetting people who are typical loan customers and trying to convince them that a credit card is a better option.

    18. Re:Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, it is not off the subject. It is entirely on topic, seeing as how it's in the headline.

      He didn't call the DS a gimmick. He did say the touch-screen on the DS was a gimmick, and that Nintendo shouldn't base their marketing solely on that.

      Saying that whole Pokemon bit is not demeaning. It might be wrong, but not demeaning.

      I suggest you read the article instead of the inaccurate Slashdot summary.

    19. Re:Totally misleading... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 1

      My point exactly. If you are hungry, you get the former; if you're thirsty, you get the latter. They're both still in the food business, but target different markets. In Harrison's mind, the DS and the PSP are in the same business (handheld console business) but are targetting different spheres.

      Whether or not this is the case is a different matter. What matters is that this is how he sees it and how Sony's plan follows this idea. If Sony sees the DS as a bag of chips, it is irrelevant to Sony as it is targetting a different sphere.

      Truly, there could be people who wish to buy one of them. To them, the PSP is in direct competition with the DS. But what matters here, and this is where Slashdot has it wrong, is that Sony and Harrison don't see it that way, and Harrison is speaking on behalf of himself. He is not speaking for the customer.

    20. Re:Totally misleading... by plumby · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned, each has part of the market to themselves (Nintendo with youngsters and Sony with the Media player angle), but there's a big overlap in the general hand-held games market.

      I know that there's a lot of people out there who are in the market for one or other of these. Do you honestly believe that a senior VP in Sony doesn't? Harrison clearly knows what he's doing, and by trying to dismiss the DS as nothing more than a platform for Pokemon he's obviously trying to taint its image in that area.

    21. Re:Totally misleading... by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      ..and Nintendo tends to ignore the fun for mature audiences only market, they also don't cater to the one-device-for-games-and-multimedia-on-the-go market either.

      And boy, what a great market that is, too! Really, no really, I want to watch a movie on a tiny screen like that. As bad as cell phone movies.

    22. Re:Totally misleading... by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      A: It's not trolling if it's a fact. The vast majority of PSP titles are conversions of older, middling quality PS2 titles. B: Microsoft has nothing to do with this. C: You've totally missed the point of the discussion which is about Harrison's marketing double talk and got yourself all worked up over a parting remark about Sony treating the PSP as a second class (see "A:" above) platform.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    23. Re:Totally misleading... by paulymer5 · · Score: 1

      Pardon, I refer to "Thus far it looks a lot like their gaming market is the same as Apple's. That is for people who enjoy playing the same games they played five or six years ago on another platform."

      I didn't miss the point of the discussion. I'd simply like to note your last statement goes in a completely different direction itself and seems to jab at a company and a market totally unrelated to gaming.

    24. Re:Totally misleading... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Firstly, it is not off the subject. It is entirely on topic, seeing as how it's in the headline.

      No, the fact that he used the work "gimmick" to describe one specific part of the DS is off-topic. The fact is, he was calling the DS a gimmick. He didn't say "the DS is a gimmick", but he still said it. Since when do /. titles have to be a literal quote?

      He didn't call the DS a gimmick.

      Yes, yes he did.

      Saying that whole Pokemon bit is not demeaning. It might be wrong, but not demeaning.

      Yes, yes it is. What he said, and also how he said it. It was entirely demeaning.

      I suggest you read the article instead of the inaccurate Slashdot summary.

      You have the reading comprehension of a 10 year-old... Not only did you completely misunderstand the article, you didn't understand my comments at all either.

      I've read the story, how else would I have exact quotes from it? How else would I have discussed things not in the summary?

      I'm tired of hitting my head against a wall arguing with you, since nothing is getting through, so don't expect any further replies.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:Totally misleading... by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      Err...

      I don't think it had so much to do with the age-appropriateness of the games as the game format. PSP games are essentially PSX games on a different resolution screen - it's a push-button console in a smaller box. The DS has extra functionality that changes the kind of games that can be played on it, making two entirely different markets. DS games simply can't be played on the PSP, and PSP games aren't worth much on the DS if they don't take advantage of the touch screen and rely on the big PSP screen for flash. This would be true even if they covered the same age niche.

      So I think it's true that the competition between the DS and the PSP can't be characterized the way we see the Xbox/PS2/Gamecube competition, where most big titles will come out for all 3 consoles and your choice comes down to nitty things like poly counts and online options.

      On the other hand, I suspect Sony says there isn't a conflict because they are losing.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
  8. Sour grapes by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Informative
    And their "gimick" is not only outselling the "real" PSP in japan, for the past several weeks it's been outselling every other piece of gaming hardware combined. How irrelevant of it.

    Of course if you want to glorify the "technical race" over gimicky things like novel methods of input (like joysticks and d-pads?) than PCs have the dedicated gaming systems beat hands down.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Sour grapes by Hank+Chinaski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      does this say, microsoft sold less than 10.000 xboxen in 2005 in japan? that's incredible!

      Japanese hardware sales for August 15 - August 21:

      System - Weekly sales (2005 sales)

      1. DS: 80,945 (1,462,984)
      2. PS2: 33,292 (1,322,678)
      3. PSP: 23,923 (1,150,150)
      4. GBASP: 16,721 (483,335)
      5. GC: 3,960 (148,345)
      6. GBA: 822 (17,219)
      7. Xbox: 263 (9,458)

      --
      IAAL
    2. Re:Sour grapes by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think another point to add is the cost. One can buy two DS units for $10 more than it costs to buy one PSP.

      Sony has to work hard to promote the PSP as an all-around portable entertainment machine. For me, that won't happen unless they open up the UMD spec so I can record UMDs and use them on the PSP. I don't think that will happen though.

      I don't have either unit, and I am planning to sell my backlight-modded GBA because I use it only rarely now.

      Right now, I am just using a Palm compatible device, and it does what I want for now, games (though rarely), more for images, audio, video and PDA functions.

    3. Re:Sour grapes by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      If those numbers are right, that list is amazing, it says so much...

      Of course the number of units is going to be higher for the DS then everything else, thats no big surprise. It's Cheap.

      Whats amazing is that roughly 65% more was spent on the DS then the PSP(based of of USD$130 vs USD$250) but the total for the year isn't nearly as unbalanced. For the year the psp has a WAY higher total. I would love to know what the break down is for the last 6 months, when the DS really started to outsell the psp. To me, with a number of good DS games being able to have 8 people play off of one cartage, the more DS there are the worse it gets for the PSP.

      AS for the poor xbox, yup MS screwed the pooch when it came to the japanese market. People have spent about the same on the xbox for the whole year as they spent on the GBASP this past week. wooooT for the xbox!

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    4. Re:Sour grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day I hope I will say boxen too because it is cool, like anything that separates you from the crowd. It could make me an anti-hero, defending my eccentric ways! Being a martyr can be empowering, yes?

    5. Re:Sour grapes by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

      microsoft sold less than 10.000 xboxen in 2005 in japan?

      the decimal precision is unnecessary as xbox units are only sold by the whole. and i'm sure there are individual people in japan that have bought more than 10 xboxes, i doubt sales nationwide didn't exceed 10 units.

      --
      Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
    6. Re:Sour grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. PSP: 23,923 (1,150,150)

      For those not really into numerology, this means: do not upgrade to 2.00, stay at 1.50!

  9. I think they're BOTH right. by SeaFox · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Nintendo DS is gimmicky. Double screens is helpful in some games, but for most people it's as awkward as the three pronged controller on N64.

    And Sony's comments are arrogant. It's the games that ultimately decide which platform is better, and having a bigger screen is no good if you have nothing special to show on it. Of course, I expect nothing less than this sort of statement from Sony. They still seem to think the Walkman glory is with them and continue to display Not-Invented-Here syndrome.

    1. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by ucahg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The three-pronged controller was ackward?

      Hold the train, somebody better be rewriting history.. many claim that the 64 controller hasn't been beat.

    2. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I liked the N64 controller, but it was a gimmick in some ways. It has a serious design flaw in that you could only use two "sticks" at once. This means that to use both the d-pad and the analog stick in a game was basically useless because the right hand had to use the buttons. While a turn based game could have used both, can you imagine if you had to use the d-pad in Mario 64 or a Zelda in the heat of battle? It just wasn't practice.

      The N64 controller got a lot right (the ergonomics were great for example), but I would argue that the GC, PS2 (and dual shock), or X-Box controllers all had better setups with respect to the d-pad.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by Ismilar · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's gimmicky at all.

      I think that a touchpad should be standard equipment on a handheld for first person shooters (and on consoles as well, although not even Nintendo seems to agree on that one).

      Having the touch pad as a second screen might be a bit of a gimmick, but it could be very useful for real time strategy games and such.

      I think touch pads (if not touch screens) will be standard on all (or most) portable systems from now on.

    4. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by game+kid · · Score: 1

      By "many" do you mean the single women?

      Seriously, I loved it--ideally, you'd be able to fly around and shoot with only the center prong (if you haven't noticed, I like scrolling shooters). I like the DualShock 2 better though--pressure sensitive buttons etc. I still haven't tried ones from newer systems, or the XBox or GameCube.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    5. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by ucahg · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong.. I like the gamecube controller a lot.. perhaps better. It took a while to get used to though. Now that I think back so did N64's controller.

      *remembers holding the outside two prongs while extendng index finger to joystick.. wow how stupid was I?*

    6. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      xbox controllers? are you high? even the s controller is mushy and difficult to use.

      GC controller is easily the best video game controller, but ill listen to arguments for the genesis controller (not dreamcast, that textured analog stick ate my thumb for breakfast).

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    7. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call it a design flaw. they could have just intended for the user to choose either the analog stick or the control pad but not a combination of both. they probably didnt want the controls of games to become so complex and requiring so many buttons.
      and i can't imagine mario 64 or zelda 64 being much better even if the control pad was more accessible.

    8. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      the xbox s-controller is hands down the best controller I've used out of all of them

      of course I had to get used to it first.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    9. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by Headcase88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't want to end up making 5 posts here so let's just get all my opinions out in one post

      SNES > GameCube > Dual Shock > NES > N64 >> XBox-s >>>> Xbox

      SNES: Small and confortable, pretty simple but has enough buttons.

      Gamecube: Big A button gives easy access to both B and Y buttons without having to move your thumb much. Comfy overall and I like the little C-stick.

      Dual Shock: The sticks are a unconfortable for me, but the digital pad is great for most games and the layout is easy to understand.

      N64: I didn't like how most games forced use of the stick, making the third prong annoying deadweight. The sticks wore out pretty badly after a while.

      XBox S: A bit big, I don't really like how the triggers are behind the controller, it interferes with how I grip the controller. The buttons are way too small and bulbous for me.

      XBox: Before the Xbox launch, Ed Fries (or someone else form MS) said "this controller tested perfectly in focus groups and we're not going to change it or make another one" or something similar. It's seriously one of the reasons I leaned away from the XBox (which was a good decision because since launch the console has been offering great games in genres I don't like).

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    10. Re:I think they're BOTH right. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      N64 controller was otherwise pretty damn good, and clearly beat the competition... but it's not that good in retrospect, if you compare it to what Sony came up with later (Dualshocks) and what they themselves came up with later (GameCube controller).

      In retrospect, N64 controller has two bad things, in my mind: Not all of the controlling stuff was always at hand (so games had to be designed around that limitation), and the analog stick was too long and needed too much force to use.

      At least that was my opinion as someone who played some N64 games again after a loooooong stretch of GameCube games =)

  10. The software rules our world... by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gimmick or not... ...a new game-console relies almost entirely on the number of hot titles for the gamers to enjoy. Sure...the PSP is a great looking handheld gaming device, lot's of cool features and a solid backing by a company that already rocked our world with the first "worthy" proprietary 3d chip (Playstation the original) back some years ago. When it comes to gaming pleasure, I'd belive the Nintendo DS would do really well too because of the touch screen...just look at that new "pet" game where you have a live "3d" dog you can "touch" and play with that have been taking Japan by storm, now that's innovative but It might be a tad bit late...because Nintendo took a LONG time to release cool games for it's new baby. And I think PSP will stand a lot stronger in that area, better hardware too. But the point remains....it's all about the games.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:The software rules our world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in matters of console creating, I have never relied on sony. You should remember that the psx came out after a colaboration between sony and nintendo, and it was supposed to be something like a snes2, but nintendo somehow "betrayed" sony with panasonic (it's a long history).
      with psx sony acomplised a very good product (i have one), and most importantly, they commercialiced it veeery well.
      with ps2, they really did nothing. They used the playstation brand, and created a very well advertised "big psx".
      with psp, i think they're doing the same thing. It look pretty good, but it's expensive to buy, expensive to "programming" (sorry, i'm not english), etc.

      i really think that the handheld scenario nowadays is just like a lot of years ago, with gamegear and gameboy. The first is expensive, hard to program and the battery sucks; the second is cheap, simple to program, and has much more battery.

    2. Re:The software rules our world... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      So you are saying history is repeating itself? Well okay, that could very well be.

      On the note of simple programming...I'd love it if Sony and Nintendo got their act together and made the hardware information a little bit more available to the "bedroom coders" so we could get some "endorsed" grassroot fanboyism going....you know...like in the C64/Amiga/Spectrum heydays...I really miss that.

      Today ...when someone "at home" breaks the "Sony/Nintendo/Xbox-bios" just so they can run their own stuff on it...people could even face jailtime just for playing with their own stuff. This is the sort of hostility that has somewhat put me off.

      However ...on that note....Sony's chairman has informed us that Sony Playstation 3 - will be open for the "grassroot coders"

      I'm not sure if they'll take the same approach with the PSP though...but hey...I'm hoping so!

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    3. Re:The software rules our world... by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      If you think having a virtual dog that you can touch or pet is innovative, then i suggest you do a google search for 'Dogz', or 'Catz', or 'tamagochi.' Nintendogs is just as innovative as porting all the NES/SNES/N64 games to the DS is innovative. In other words, not at all.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    4. Re:The software rules our world... by servognome · · Score: 1

      I'd love it if Sony and Nintendo got their act together and made the hardware information a little bit more available to the "bedroom coders" so we could get some "endorsed" grassroot fanboyism going....you know...like in the C64/Amiga/Spectrum heydays...I really miss that.

      I'm sure Sony and Nintendo would love to have the same long term economic prosperity as C64/Amiga/Spectrum.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:The software rules our world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as opposed to the PSP line up of PS2 ports?

    6. Re:The software rules our world... by I_Human · · Score: 1

      Try this link: http://www.gamersgraveyard.com/repository/snes/his tory/snescdrom.html

      Basically from what I remember (not necessarily in this article) Sony tried to force Nintendo to pay licensing fees for each console sold, and give them the rights to make their own console that would play the same games which Ninty would have no control over. But I'm a fanboy and may have twisted that up a bit in my head.

      --
      -JP
    7. Re:The software rules our world... by MindPrison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The idea of virtual pets are not new - that was besides the point. The new thing is that you actually touch the screen and thus...the dog! It's NOT the same as moving your mouse around where the arrow hits the pet.... you get an entirely different feel when you use your fingers on the display and it - to us - looks like actually touching the pet. We can always argue about the actual difference in that...but social as we are...the need to get "closer" is pretty evident in it's success.

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    8. Re:The software rules our world... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the voice interaction : Also another important part in immersing the player on an emotional front.

    9. Re:The software rules our world... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      The Sega Saturn came first.

      And don't give me that 'worthy' 3d graphics chip stuff, the Saturn had Radiant Silvergun.

  11. The DS _is_ a gimmick... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but the PSP is worse because of the expense, proprietariness, DRM, crappy battery life, and Sony's customer-hostile attitude.

    The way I see it, the pinnacle of handheld gaming is the GameBoy Advance SP.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:The DS _is_ a gimmick... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Is it bad that it's a gimmick?
      The analog stick and trigger buttons were gimmicks. They worked.

      The touchscreen and dualscreen are gimmicks. They work.

      The second screen is extremely helpful in certain games (where you'd otherwise switch between game screens all the time) for status screens, maps, "accessories".

      The touchscreen is pretty much adding the closest to mouse input as currently avaialable.
      Think about all those little (and fun) flash games that use the mouse. It's now possible easily.
      Think about those RPGs and others where you had to use the d-pad to move between targets and waste time. Now it's just point and click.
      Think about first person shooters! Metroid Prime Hunters was reported to have excellent control using the touchscreen, very similar to the mouse input on the PC.

      --
      ^_^
  12. I will now talk out of my ass. by hotgirlgamer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to type a lengthy retort to all you sony burning nintendo fanboys with my psp's built in browser but..i'm....running ..out ~!#()@$ batteryyy.y........

    1. Re:I will now talk out of my ass. by p0 · · Score: 1

      since when did running out of battery made you repeat some letters and type extra dots?

      * target

      --
      This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  13. Desperation? by satellite17 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like the remarks of a desperate man, If there is one thing that Nintendo know about it's the handheld market, They've dominated it for so long.

    I think Sony have missed the point about battery life and original software something which saw the end of the Game Gear and the Atari Lynks(sp?)

    Is the PSP technically superior to the DS? Yes, Was the Game Gear technically superior to the Game Boy? Yes. Which console won?

    1. Re:Desperation? by evilned · · Score: 1

      I just got back from a trip from the US to Singapore and back. I got a good 6 or 7 hours out of it on the plane, the two handhelds you compare the PSP to could barely last 2 hours. I have both the PSP and the DS, and yeah, the DS lasts longer on a charge than the PSP, but it isn't orders of magnitude better than its competition. My take on em, I like em both. The DS has some wonderfully inventive games, Kirby and Meteos are both excellent and loads of fun. The PSP has WipeOut Pure, Ridge Racer, and Lumines which are all excellent as well. Right now the DS is riding high with the big releases like Kirby, Meteos, and Advance Wars, but you'll see another wave of high class PSP titles soon. Burnout Legends in particular seems like it will be a great title.

      --

      "My head hurts, My feet stink, and I dont love Jesus." -Jimmy Buffett

    2. Re:Desperation? by satellite17 · · Score: 1

      That's fair comment, I guess both machines are fairly new to market but I still believe that on balance the DS will have the better games overall.

      I'm happy to be proved wrong however as I'm a Game Junkie and will buy any console that entertains me. Hence why my living room is a mess of cables and consoles (hell I've even got a 3DO kicking around somewhere, Star Control 2 rocks!)

      I also agree that Burnout Legends does look very interesting

    3. Re:Desperation? by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      I think Atari had the "Lynx", to go with the cat theme...

      Good thing they tanked a long time ago, or we'd be bickering over stories about apple and atari bickering over trying to trademark the name of a kind of animal, :-P

    4. Re:Desperation? by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      And Lynx was superior to all of them and look what happened.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    5. Re:Desperation? by twosmokes · · Score: 1

      I still believe that on balance the DS will have the better games overall.

      I'm not so sure about this. The DS has been out for what... nearly a year now? And the only title worth buying is a dog simulator?

      I'm really suprised at how small the catalog of DS games is. I thought there would be more high profile titles on it by now.

      I did a lazy search on gamespot and it looks like the DS has only 4 more titles out than the PSP... and three of those are nintendogs. Can that be right?

    6. Re:Desperation? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Is the PSP technically superior to the DS? Yes, Was the Game Gear technically superior to the Game Boy? Yes. Which console won?

      The problem is that looking at technical superiority and ignoring practicality issues gives a very distorted view. DS may be somewhat inferior to PSP technically, but costing 48% less, it's not hard to see where the cash-strapped buyer will go.

      I think most of the other handheld corpses were too impractical, with steep high-end pricing compared to the "everyman" Gameboy pricing, or high maintainance costs where they sucked down batteries.

      I think Nintendo was right to be conservative, now that rechargeables are a lot more practical, the NiCd batteries of the original Game Boy era were simply horrible, now we have affordable NiMH and Lithium batteries, and that color screens and backlights are now a lot more reasonable in cost and practical in power consumption.

    7. Re:Desperation? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>I'm not so sure about this. The DS has been out for what... nearly a year now? And the only title worth buying is a dog simulator?

      I depends on what games you like, but other good ones are WarioWare Touched, Super Mario 64, Meteos, Kirby, and I hear Advance Wars is good, though I haven't tried it. It's also got some really good games coming out, like Lunar Dragon Song (the first new Lunar in like 10 years). Granted, that's not a lot of games, but there's exactly 0 games I'm interested in on the PSP, whether out or that I've seen coming. "Better" is completely subjective, but for me, the DS wins by a longshot.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    8. Re:Desperation? by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      Advance Wars was great for the GBA. If you're on the fence about it for DS, grab a rom of the GBA version and Visual Boy Advance and give it a try. It's a cartoony turn-based strategy game that's a lot of fun.

      I'm also planning on picking up Bomberman DS when I get some money. 9 player versus mode from one card? That's awesome. Plus there's Another Code, Viewtiful Joe, Animal Crossing... What is there for PSP? Lumines and (coming soon) GTA? The DS is a much better bang for your buck.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    9. Re:Desperation? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>I'm also planning on picking up Bomberman DS when I get some money. 9 player versus mode from one card? That's awesome.

      Nine player?! NINE PLAYER?!? Wow. If I could just find 8 people with DSs.....

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  14. Gameboy by cataclyst · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Nintendo the PIONEER of the handheld market?

    I know that the Atari Lynx came out at about the same time as the Gameboy, and there are some serious parallels between Atari Lynx vs. Gameboy (better hardware vs. solid niche) and PSP vs DS (again... better hardware vs. solid niche. Is Sony really so arrogant as to think that the PSP is far and away superior to the DS? Guess so...

    BTW: anyone remember BetaMax?

    --
    E = m * c^(Hammer)
    1. Re:Gameboy by pappy97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is Sony really so arrogant as to think that the PSP is far and away superior to the DS?"

      Was there any legitimate excuse for DS not having FULL wi-fi capability at launch? I don't even mean being able to hack it and use a web browser like PSP, I mean playing online games with people all over world using free wi-fi at Starbucks.

      Sony has every right to not think of Nintendo as a threat in the new handheld market: Nintendo, once again, dropped the ball when it comes to ONLINE GAMING.

    2. Re:Gameboy by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't Nintendo the PIONEER of the handheld market?

      NEC was. It took the rest of the industry 10 years to catch up to the turbografx handheld.

    3. Re:Gameboy by Lendrick · · Score: 1

      Nintendo, once again, dropped the ball when it comes to ONLINE GAMING. ...and instead, they left out wireless and released a substantially less expensive product with a much stronger game library.

      They didn't drop the ball, they just were better at figuring out what people actually want. I'll get a PSP when a couple games come out for it that strike me as remotely interesting. For the time being, I have a wireless PDA that plays movies and browses the web just fine.

    4. Re:Gameboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry about it, but i think psp neither has full wifi compatibility (without hacks), so nintendo was not pressed to do so.
      but i'm also concerned about it. I don't really understand why i can't connect the ds with my wifi router and play with/against a friend.

    5. Re:Gameboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most people don't care about online gaming, so what's your point?

    6. Re:Gameboy by dhamsaic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So what PSP games are you playing with your friends over the internet?

      None, right? Which PSP games support infrastructure wireless co-op or VS play?

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    7. Re:Gameboy by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      No, the PSP had wifi from the start. Unfortunately most online titles for the system haven't been all that special.

      The DS SDK, and the system, were sent out early to get a head start on Sony, so Wifi was incomplete. You will be able to hook it up to a router (w/ certain games, the likes of THPS and Mario Kart) around October or November, when the first online games start coming out.

    8. Re:Gameboy by Rotting · · Score: 1

      Maybe I am wrong but I don't think Sony really has many Infrastructure enabled games. Twisted Metal and that new Virus game and a few others but really the majority of "online" games that Sony has are local wifi only... the same as Nintendo.

      Comparing the two of those I would actually say Sony falls behind as most of the Nintendo games require only one cart. Hell Meteos even has the ability to upload a full working demo of the game to another ds. Granted it is local wifi and not a global internet thing but it is still cool.

      Maybe I'm way off base here but I would wait and see what the Nintendo online service is like once it ships this fall to make a fair judgement.

    9. Re:Gameboy by 222 · · Score: 1

      They have not, however, dropped the ball when it comes to gaming.

      I wonder why nintendo does so well with all these "failures"?

    10. Re:Gameboy by yammosk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Which PSP games support infrastructure wireless co-op or VS play?

      Ummm... What is Twisted Metal a PSP launch title? How much did I win Alex?

    11. Re:Gameboy by pla · · Score: 1

      Was there any legitimate excuse for DS not having FULL wi-fi capability at launch?

      Yeah - It's primary use, as a portable handheld console-like gaming system.

      Not "coffee powered WLAN party", not "excuse for geeks to feign sociability", not "MMORPG that leaves your parents basement".

      You feed it roms and batteries and it helps pass the time on long trips and in the waiting room at the dentist.


      And the PSP? I only have one question - Has anything "Now available on DVD and for PSP" sold a single "for PSP" copy?

      One company, getting trashed in the marketplace, badmouthing the current leader. Nothing to see here, move along.

    12. Re:Gameboy by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "NEC was. It took the rest of the industry 10 years to catch up to the turbografx handheld."

      Oh please. I used to have one of those, and it was neat, but it was not some pinnacle of gaming everybody aspired to attain. It was BIG. There was no way this thing was fitting in your pocket. It was EXPENSIVE. $299, if I recall. And that was back in the early 90's before game consoles came out at that price. It required six AA batteries that died within about 3 hours. It sucked as a portable system.

      I took this thing on a 3 week camping trip. The only thing that made it worthwhile was that my dad hooked up a big ass rechargable battery to it. It lasted about 10 hours. Fortunately, I mostly played it in the car or in the tent so I didn't have to lug it (along with the honkin' battery) anywhere. If my dad didn't make that battery for it, it would have stayed at home. It just wasn't that practical as a 'long-trip' machine. The following year, I had a Game Boy, now that thing worked out really well.

      With that said, there are some admirable traits of the TE. It had an AWESOME screen. Far better than the GBA SP's. (Sadly, defective pixels were common.) It also had a TV Tuner attachment. Most people may not care, but it was great to have on a camping trip. Though the TurboGrafx system wasn't too popular in the USA, it still had a decent library of games. For those who aren't aware, the TurboGrafx system used tiny little cards roughly the size of credit cards for its games. They were a great size for portable gaming. It's worth mentioning that the nature of this system meant that the games for it weren't watered down like portable games tended to be.

      NEC was not the pioneer of handheld gaming. It had some great things going for it, but in ways that seriously mattered, it failed miserably. Instead of giving the industry a new direction to go, it taught them a bitter lesson and reaffirmed that Nintendo knew what they were doing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:Gameboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what? Fuck you people and your online gaming. Why does everything nowadays have to be online? MMO's, FPS's, everything has to be shared with the collective fucktard hive. I don't want online gaming, I want good solid gameplay that I can enjoy BY MYSELF. It's great and all that you people want to make gaming into a more social(sarcasm) activity, but don't you think it's adding to the fatass syndrome we're already facing?

      I salute you Nintendo for trying to find other ways to entertain people besides "Hey, lets let fucktards hook up with eachother over the internet and act like total assholes!"

      -End of Rant

    14. Re:Gameboy by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

      Was there any legitimate excuse for DS not having FULL wi-fi capability at launch? I don't even mean being able to hack it and use a web browser like PSP, I mean playing online games with people all over world using free wi-fi at Starbucks.


      So uh, Nintendo's going to require we get an adapter? That's going to really kill sales. I mean honestly, I can't believe they'd be that stupid.

      Oh, wait, they weren't. We're just waiting on some good online games for the DS.

      Nintendo dropped no ball. PSP is just grasping at straws to explain why their handheld's sales are so dismal.
    15. Re:Gameboy by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I had one too, and I will freely admit that it had many flaws, and I actually never played it much. But it was still a very impressive piece of engineering, and it's the only time that a handheld system was at the same level as the current consoles of the day. And the fact that it took 5 years until someone else could come up with a comparable handheld is proof; 5 years in gaming technology is a loooong time.

    16. Re:Gameboy by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      free wifi at starbucks? clearly you havent been to a starbucks lately. free wifi at a coffee shop, ok, but starbucks only has that stupid tmobile hostspot crap.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    17. Re:Gameboy by Gogo0 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because Nintendo is working on a FREE online infastructure akin to Live, but as previously mentioned: free.
      It is a lot easier, quicker, and cheaper to not have that than to have it. Nintendo chose to have it and not half-ass it in the interrim.
      Yes, Sony had free DIY online gaming with the PSP (which is by no means bad), but that is a far cry from what Nintendo was building.

      I am not at all a fan of xbox or even Live (I'll stick to the PC for most of my online gaming), but Live set the bar high, and it looks like Nintendo is trying to match it. Sony hasnt, and doesnt seem to care to even try.

      When Nintendo and Microsoft have competent online solutions and Sony has nothing, then who seems to have dropped the ball when it comes to online gaming?

    18. Re:Gameboy by tepples · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      dhamsaic: Which PSP games support infrastructure wireless co-op or VS play?

      yammosk: Ummm... What is Twisted Metal a PSP launch title?

      Umm... "games" is plural. Which other leading PSP titles with infrastructure multiplayer did you have in mind?

    19. Re:Gameboy by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And the fact that it took 5 years until someone else could come up with a comparable handheld is proof; 5 years in gaming technology is a loooong time."

      About the only thing that statement proves is that battery technology takes a loooong time to advance.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:Gameboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm... "games" is plural.
      yeah man, were wrong. you'd would have come off as less of a dick if you'd have said said, "okay, i was wrong. but can you think of any others?"
  15. Sony makes a good point: We need more gikkicks! by veganopolis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That is right; the PSP must be a superior product. The DS is a stupid toy gimmick for only blind mutes. We should put them in cereal boxes for those people who ride the short bus. I bet they will like that.

    How about we take the DS and put little messages on them and drop them over the starving children in Africa, with gimmicky statements like "cheer up! just try not to think about food!"

    I think Sony might be on to something here. On the other hand, the PSP is just a boring old game system. Maybe if they had made it a little more gimmicky they could even outsell the DS: http://news.punchjump.com/article.php?id=1223

    1. Re:Sony makes a good point: We need more gikkicks! by veganopolis · · Score: 1

      oops gimmicks! damn you /.!!!! damn you!!!

  16. reminds me of another gimmick invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the submarine, that is until they outfitted it with torpedos...

    kind of makes sinking the psp battleship trivial, doesn't it?

  17. What a joke... by Deitheres · · Score: 1

    Some choice quotes from the article:

    "Nintendo knows its target audience, because it has really narrowed that down; and it's pretty much defined by a boy or girl's ability to admire Pokémon."

    HAHAHAHA... You're kidding, right? If we're going to generalise like that, why don't we just say that Sony's target audience is FPS and RPGs.

    "Those formats don't appear in our planning. It's not a fair comparison; not fair on them, I should stress. That sounds arrogant, maybe, but it's the truth."

    Obviously, Harrison is confusing fact with conjecture.

    He also makes references to different target markets... I think it's a bit disingenuous of Sony to say that. The handheld video game market is just that-- the handheld video game market. Last I checked, the DS is outselling the PSP, and the PSP sales are not even close to Sony's projections.

    Once again, hubris clouds fact.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

    1. Re:What a joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA... You're kidding, right? If we're going to generalise like that, why don't we just say that Sony's target audience is FPS and RPGs.

      Let's do it even better... Sony knows its target audience because it has really narrowed that down; and it's pretty much defined by those who think stealing cars and interacting with virtual whores is the pinnacle of gaming.

      Seriously, Sony is uber high when it comes to this. My theory on why Nintendo is so popular among us adult nerds is our PCs are already setup for serious gaming and we use that for "adult" games, like FPS, and the rest. With a Nintendo system, one thing is always guaranteed, you will get new and INNOVATIVE games that you won't find elsewhere. Not just "gee whiz, it's even more realistic bad guys for me to kill.", but actually different, engaging, and innovative game play.

    2. Re:What a joke... by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If the mood for FPS strikes me, I still have Unreal Tournament (the original) and Quake 3 Arena.

      The DS is just mad cool. Not that the PSP isn't, but I just think it's silly for Sony to try and act like they aren't attempting to directly compete with Nintendo.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

  18. Mine is better than yours... and more expensive by erica_ann · · Score: 1


    If these companies REALLY want a great game console and want it to sell.. Instead of "mine cost more than yours does, so mine is better" they out to start having a contest that says "I can get mine to run and be better than yours and it is WAY WAY Cheaper so more people can AFFORD it."

    I know as time goes by the prices drop and they seem more reasonable.. like the XBox and PS2 ... but when you keep coming out every couple of years with new stuff and the price skyrockets.. so many people and parents think "Hey, as much as I spent on that, you can wait another few years till I get another one. that expensive"

    So at the end of the run, when the prices drop, is when the sales will stabilize over time. But who wants to dump hundreds of dollars into it up front? If Xbox had originally sold theirs at $200 like it is now.. the sales would have skyrocketed even more in the beginning. Why does it take 2 years for the company to bring it down to a decent price instead of starting out so high that it makes people turn away? As far as I am concerned, the same applies whether it is Nintendo, Sony, or whoever.

    1. Re:Mine is better than yours... and more expensive by cataclyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um... for one, the consoles BEGIN as a loss leader (meaning that the company actually loses money for each console sold.) As the price of hardware manufacturing drops (as it *always* does over time), they start to make profit on the console instead of just the games. When they want to give their market a good jump start, they then decide to lose money on the consoles again...

      --
      E = m * c^(Hammer)
    2. Re:Mine is better than yours... and more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >instead of starting out so high that it makes people turn away?

      Not everyone turns away. So it is better to start out high and milk the early adopters and then go low. Otherwise even the people willing to pay high would be paying low, a bad thing for the console maker. Of course most of their money is from licensing anyway.

  19. As a DS owner by neostorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to agree. The dual screen rarely brings anything to the device that a larger screen or better use of existing screen real-estate doesn't. I hate the second screen in that respect, because it constantly diverts my attention from where it should be: the gameplay. There are a couple interesting uses for it, but I have yet to see any use of the second screen that justifies it.

    That being said, the rest of the device is a dream. The games that have come out for it (or are right around the corner) are almost always sure winners: Nintendogs, Kirby, the new Sonic, the new Mario, Castlvania, the upcoming Animal Crossing, Lost in Blue, Meteos, Advance Wars DS... I held off on buying a DS until yesterday (a few run-ins with coworkers playing Nintendogs finally sold me), and I think the library of games and creativity shown in each one really, genuinely offers something new to gamers. This is mostly because of the stylus interface, but they use the wireless and flip-top covers in wierd unique ways as well.

    The only thing else I could ask for would be that it played the old GB games, an analogue stick, and maybe a nice emulator (ala PSP). And considering that the PSP has all of those, that brings me to my point: the only reason the DS won me over for Portable Platform Money-Sink 2005(tm) was because the games are awesome.

    1. Re:As a DS owner by BootNinja · · Score: 1

      my brother plays the old pokemon games on his ds all the time.

    2. Re:As a DS owner by sanosuke76 · · Score: 1

      That's one thing I've noticed time and again, cited by the Nintendo players: the games - and usually they're citing the same ones. Yet, the games they cite as compelling titles don't share my core interests in gaming:

      Carnage. Blood. I want to tear the arms off of zombies and beat them to a second death with them. I want to fill a villain with lead, then attach a brick of C-4 to his back and shove him at his friends to check out the splatter pattern. I want to inflict terrific carnage upon evil people (note the evil qualifier - which is why I won't play GTA), and if they don't suffer enough when I kill them, I want to bring them back to life so that I can get it right the second time.

      This is the kind of title I like to play. It's why I play the PS2 instead of the Gamecube, it's why Mario never caught my fancy, etc. Now, given the audience targetting, I'm absolutely sure that the PSP would be more likely to provide me with the digital carnage I desire to immerse myself in.

      Yep, I'm interested in gameplay, but what I value in gameplay is very different from what Nintendo gamers seem to largely focus on.

      --
      My 229 is all the Sig I need http://thegunwiki.com/
    3. Re:As a DS owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your comment is disturbingly sadist (regardless of the pains you take to stress that you only hurt "evil" people). In my opinion, gratuitous violence like that which you describe is titillation (as with porn), not "gameplay."

    4. Re:As a DS owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a DS owner I have to agree ... I held off on buying a DS until yesterday

      WTF mate?

    5. Re:As a DS owner by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and that's why you're not the type of person Nintendo is aiming for. Just like why I play the PC instead of the PS2. Nintendo has a specific audience (fun & pickup play > violence), and they definately aim for it.

    6. Re:As a DS owner by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I own both. I have played tons of Hot Shots Golf on my PSP, and I can't wait for Burnout Legends next month. But that's 2 games I expect to totally take my attention. I've played most others.

      That said, I also have a DS. For the DS I've been addicted to Mr. Driller (doesn't use the touch screen well, but the extra vertical height does help), Yoshi's Touch and Go for a long time (tons of fun once you get the hang of it. Can get very tough), Kirby Curse Canvas (amazing use of the pen). I played Meteos for a while (just isn't the same without the pen), I'm playing Advanced Wars now (doesn't really need the touch functionality) and Nintendogs.

      I can't wait to try that surgery game (can't remember the name right now), the new Castlevania (though the touch screen looks like a gimmick there), Animal Crossing (pen would help A LOT, the GC version had me addicted for months), and many more. Lost in blue looks quite interesting too.

      The good DS games can be classified in two ways: Those that use the 2nd screen well (Castlevania for the map, Advanced Wars for the second front/status info, Mr. Driller for the extra height), and those that just wouldn't work the same without the pen (Yoshi, Animal Crossing, Nintendogs, etc.)

      The PSP looks better. No question. But so far I've enjoyed my DS FAR more than my PSP. Right now, the DS is the clear winner in my mind.

      To be fair, there are many things (Burnout: Legends, GTA: Liberty City Stories, and more) that I think will bring the PSP into being a force. But the fact is that it has been stalled for a few months. I have no doubt it will pick up TONS of steam, but it sure took it a long time to get out of 1st gear (not that the DS was a speed demon there either).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:As a DS owner by Idealius · · Score: 1

      "I want to inflict terrific carnage upon evil people (note the evil qualifier - which is why I won't play GTA)"

      Uh.

      Ok, that was wildly off-topic.

      Because killing virtual people in a hypothetically evil setting is different from killing innocent "people".

      The reality is it's all polygons, so get over it. Anyone who cannot be taught this fact is neither here nor there. It bears no significance on our society. Games are not reality and will never be, they'll be polygons, or pixels, or little dots on the screen. -- Or full-featured holodecks, matrix, perfect, BUT WAIT IT'S ALL STILL FAKE.

      I'm just saying I don't feel less moral for playing games where I kill innocent "bots" regardless of how I do it.

    8. Re:As a DS owner by Rotting · · Score: 1

      I own a DS as well and must agree that the second screen really has done nothing for the experiece for me. The touch screen on the other hand has actually made for some great gameplay. I couldn't imagine Meteos without it and who ever thought I would actually enjoy a Kirby game.

      Go figure.

    9. Re:As a DS owner by cornface · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I own a DS as well and must agree that the second screen really has done nothing for the experiece for me. The touch screen on the other hand has actually made for some great gameplay.

      Okay, now imagine for a second that you're using the touchscreen with no second screen. A nice game of "CRAP, I CAN'T SEE AROUND MY HAND!"

      Now does the second screen make more sense?

    10. Re:As a DS owner by yammosk · · Score: 1

      Your comment is disturbingly sadist

      I really had trouble taking his post seriously. Sounds to me like he is either a troll or trying to be funny.

    11. Re:As a DS owner by yammosk · · Score: 1

      Frankly the game that excites me more is SW: Battlefront 2. I want to fly me some X-Wings on a portable.

    12. Re:As a DS owner by killblues · · Score: 1

      Carnage. Blood. I want to tear the arms off of zombies and beat them to a second death with them. I want to fill a villain with lead, then attach a brick of C-4 to his back and shove him at his friends to check out the splatter pattern. I want to inflict terrific carnage upon evil people (note the evil qualifier - which is why I won't play GTA), and if they don't suffer enough when I kill them, I want to bring them back to life so that I can get it right the second time.

      Uh, remind me which system Resident Evil 4 was released for again?

    13. Re:As a DS owner by cowscows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I have no doubts that the Burnout game and especially the GTA game will help boost sales for the PSP, I don't think they're going to do much for the system in the long term. Frankly put, those games are going to suffer the same problem that a lot of the current PSP games are having. They aren't portable games. Rockstar even said they didn't think of Liberty City Stories as a portable game. I have no doubt that it'll be a good game, it's just that I'd rather play that sort of game on a big screen at home. I'll get better controls, more detail, and probably a more comfy seat to relax in while I play.

        Sony fails to realize that a portable system has different potentials and liabilities compared to a home console. Nintendo has always realized it to a degree, and they really leaned on it with the DS, adding features that work much better on a portable than they would on a console. That's why there are better games. And as developers become more comfortable with the dual screens/touch screen, we should find plenty of other cool stuff on the shelves.

      The PSP is never going to have a game that's anything more than what the PS2 can do, plus some multiplayer functions. And that's why the DS won out for me. Having the ability to play the same games to go is only appealing if I can't have new games to go instead. I can always play more GTA3 when I get back to my house. I'd rather spend my money on something unique. Who cares which handheld Tony Hawk looks best on, cause it's still going to look better in your living room. I think a lot of people are going to feel that too, if only subconsciously.

      Really, the only thing special that the PSP is offering a gamer is portability. The DS offers much more, and for a cheaper too. Unless Sony does a huge about face on something like their stance on homebrew software, they're just selling a smaller version of the PS2. And the PS2 stopped being exciting years ago.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    14. Re:As a DS owner by kerrle · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but Capcom just announced a 10 year anniversary edition of Resident Evil for the DS.

      And it'll apparently allow you to slice zombies with your knife via the stylus. Should be right up his alley. :P

    15. Re:As a DS owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally someone who understands. Especially with FPS games.

      Mod parent up!

    16. Re:As a DS owner by reclusivemonkey · · Score: 1
      I have to agree. The dual screen rarely brings anything to the device that a larger screen or better use of existing screen real-estate doesn't. I hate the second screen in that respect, because it constantly diverts my attention from where it should be: the gameplay. There are a couple interesting uses for it, but I have yet to see any use of the second screen that justifies it.
      I am only buying a DS because of. I can finally chuck my zaurus and have a Linux based PDA/real gaming portable. Once those magic dudes at DSLinux.org have done their magic.

      http://www.dslinux.org/forums/index.php?showtopic= 482
    17. Re:As a DS owner by Woek · · Score: 1

      I don't own one, but I've used one. I think that the main advantage of having two screens instead of one larger one, is that you can fold it up to a smaller size! Plus, it's like a mini HHGG :-)

    18. Re:As a DS owner by BackInIraq · · Score: 1

      Your comment is disturbingly sadist (regardless of the pains you take to stress that you only hurt "evil" people). In my opinion, gratuitous violence like that which you describe is titillation (as with porn), not "gameplay."

      This is the problem I always had with GTA 3 and GTA:VC (never bothered with SA)...the game itself didn't impress me, and I'm not generally into violence just for violence sake. Same reason that GTA:LC is not an incentive for me to get into a PSP, whereas most people bill it as a big selling point.

    19. Re:As a DS owner by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, the PSP still hasn't even been released yet (it comes out on the 1st of September)

      I got my PSP from the states when they first came out, and obviously I'm impressed with the visuals, same story for most of the gamers I know, most of us bought DS's too because, well, I guess 20-something gamers in IT just buy everything that comes along, huh?

      The funny thing is now, a few days before the PSP's real launch, all ours are just gathering dust, everyone I speak to has been saying the same story for months now - "I'm thinking of ebaying it, but I'll wait for x" (whether x is GT4, Liberty City Stories, or, uhh, actually that's it, heheheh)

      The PSP is a pain in the ass, it's a beautiful piece of kit for sure, but it feels horrendously fragile, carry it in your jeans and bang your leg into anything and that's your PSP fucked, whereas with the DS you shut it, chuck it in your pocket, and don't worry about it the rest of the day. Sure it's big enough that you know it's there, but the clamshell design gives you so much peace of mind the extra size is worth it.

      Fantastically, all through typing up this post, I've had my wife sitting across from me totally engrossed in Nintendogs on her DS, she's all "sit down! sit down! sit down!" but that's the DS, it's endlessly compelling, and endlessly fun. Much more important characteristics of a console than a beautiful design. Something Sony doesn't seem to have figured out yet (roll on Revolution)

      Having said all that, the web-browser in the 2.0 firmware is pretty slick (although it sucks it won't do flash), and Liberty City Stories really is shaping up to be something special... Despite what those pompous pricks at Edge might say.

    20. Re:As a DS owner by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 1

      The DS was a huge experiment for Nintendo. The touch screen, dual screen, microphone, etc. Most of thee experiments turned out well; just because the dual screens haven't been used to their full advantage doesn't mean it was a "gimmick" - at worst, a failed experiment.

    21. Re:As a DS owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more I think about it, the more I realize that the dual-screen setup is not at all about having more screen real estate. It's about having the option to use one screen or the other.

      Some games require that the action be on the touch screen (Meteos, Nintendogs, Kirby), while other games require that the action not be on the touch screen (Mario, Metroid, Pac'n'Roll).

      The games in the first category would work with just one touch-sensitive screen. The games in the second category would work with one normal screen and one touch-pad that wasn't a screen. The dual-screen setup simply gives you the option to do either of these things.

    22. Re:As a DS owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that brings me to my point: the only reason the DS won me over for Portable Platform Money-Sink 2005(tm) was because the games are awesome.

      duh...

    23. Re:As a DS owner by Rotting · · Score: 1

      Yeah good point. It took me a few seconds to clue into what you were getting at but you must understand that I did not get the Metroid demo with my DS ;)

      With the exception of Mario 64, none of my six games really make use of the touch screen in that way and I actually prefer just using the D-pad for controlling Mario.

      I have no problems seeing the screen in games like Kirby or Meteos which both use the stylus and in both cases I don't really bother with the top screen.

  20. Re:Zonk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since the PSP's launch, Slashdot Games has posted article after article with titles like PSP Reception Lukewarm in U.S., PSP Not A Sellout Hit, What's Up With The PSP?, and most recently PSP Usage Lower Than Expected.

    Lemme fix that for you there, Zonker.

    "Since the PSP's launch, Zonk has posted article after article with titles like PSP Reception Lukewarm in U.S., PSP Not A Sellout Hit, What's Up With The PSP?, and most recently PSP Usage Lower Than Expected. "

  21. Problem with PSP by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    Very simple ... very few high quality games, and also relatively expensive. There are a lot of good games in the making, yes, but for now there are very few really good games for it. If you don't believe me - check gamespot's PSP page

    Now don't get me wrong, hardware-wise PSP is very high quality - that company has got amazing engineers. Unfortunately, it also has a management that acts a lot like Microsoft's (bully on the block) when they're obviously not in that position.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Problem with PSP by daveaitel · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      Dynasty Warriors is a good game.

      Mercury is a great game. You move a little blob around and solve puzzles. It sounds lame, but it's quite fun and engaging.

      Rockstar's DUB driving game is great as well, even for people who don't like driving games. It's full of fun things like cops that try to chase you down, fun jumps, etc.

      And in october, PSP will have GTA, so what's the problem now? Battery life is 5+ hours, which is enough to get you across the States. The PSP is perfect for the business traveler type, even if you sit in economy, like I do.

      One great thing about it is the insta-boot. No matter where you are in a game, you just turn the thing off, and when you turn it back on, you're back where you were. It's useful for being able to play games on the go that have a longer cycle than 5 minutes.

  22. Corpses in the wake of the big N by Neuticle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's count the corpses left in the wake of Nintendo's (almost always) "inferior" hardware:

    Game Gear
    Nomad
    Lynx
    That portable TurboGrafix16 (Name anybody?)
    Wonderswan, Wonderswan crystal / color
    GP32
    NeoGeo pocket, NeoGeo Pocket color
    Tapwave Zodiac
    Ngage

    That's just a short list off the top of my head, I'm sure that there are others that a more thorough search would reveal.

    The PSP is simply not in the right price/battery life/durability range for most people to be attracted to it. It will do well with the money-to-burn crowd and with the hard-core gamers who buy everything, price be damned. As for the casual gamer that is the bread and butter of the industry, I forsee it remaining sort of "meh".

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    1. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by demon · · Score: 1

      That would be the TurboExpress. If you saw "Enemy of the State", you saw one of them.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    2. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by pharwell · · Score: 1
      That portable TurboGrafix16 (Name anybody?)

      TurboExpress. I always thought that system was neat because the portable played the same games as the console (those little HuCards).

      --
      I quote others only in order the better to express myself. -- Michel de Montaigne
    3. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      TG16 portable was called the TurboExpress.

      A friend had one and I would borrow it to take on road trips. In it's day, it was truly awesome. About the size of the original Gameboy, full color screen, played the same games (in that awesome thick-credit-card format) as the at-home system. You could also get a TV tuner add-on for further leetness. I remember playing Splatterhouse, Bonk's Adventure & Blazing Lasers for hours on school trips, rolling in the geek cred for having the hype color "gameboy" with the bloody, scary games.

      Do I wish I had spent more time pursuing the school-house honeys and less playing Bonk? Sure, but at the time it was fun.

      Oh yeah, get on topic... Yeah, it was an order of magnitude ahead of the Gameboy, and about 5X the price. It didn't make it. Price is critical for the handheld market.

    4. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by tepples · · Score: 1

      Let's count the corpses left in the wake of Nintendo's (almost always) "inferior" hardware: Game Gear

      The Game Gear was based on the Sega Master System. Though SMS graphics were in color, the SMS sound chip sucked, and so did the Game Gear's battery life.

      Nomad

      No-mad? More like no-battery-life.

      Lynx

      Lower resolution than the Game Gear, poor battery life, an unfamiliar programming model, a higher price, and Atari's notoriously subpar marketing skill doomed this one. Most of the other systems you mentioned never appeared on the shelves of Kmart/Target/Wal-Mart, as they were primarily sold in the Far East.

    5. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in the wake of the big N is the infamous Virtual Boy, created by their own hands. Anyone remember that thing? I had one, it used to tweak out my eyes, so I'd play it for an hour or so and then go drive on the freeway.

    6. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      That's not unique; for example, the Sega Nomad used Genesis cartridges (and was a huge monstrosity because of it).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that the Turbo Express predates the Nomad by a few years. It was very unique of the Turbo Express. If one of these game companies was smart, they would make their next gen system's games use a some kind UMD sized HD-DVD, so that the full fledged home system could play movies and next-gen games... and then a generation after that, a portable version of the system could be released.

    8. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Nintendo has a few corpses as well:

      Virtual Boy
      Nintendo 64
      Game Boy Color
      Just about every peripheral ever made outside the rumble pak

    9. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The Virtual Boy was a massive failure but the Nintendo 64 was reasonably popular (it sold in th 30 million range worldwide) and the Gameboy color was also amazingly popular.

      I know what many people think ... The Playstation and PS2 destroyed the competition by selling 2-4 times as many systems as their competitors; the truth is that over half of all Playstation and PS2 sales were irrelevant to anyone developing games for the system. It is reasonably common to see people buying their second (and occasionaly their third) PS2 because of disc drive failures; on top of that I know more people who own modded PS2s than I know of people who have unmodded PS2s. The final result is that 90 Million PS2s is probably equal to 30 million Gamecubes (where Nintendo only sold 20); something similar can probably be said about the Playstation and N64.

    10. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      The N64 was no failure; there were a bunch of great games and a lot of people played them. The PSX had longer legs though, simply because games became loaded with FMV and spread across 5 discs.

    11. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by lustforlike · · Score: 1

      In the PSP vs. DS argument, many people inevitably bring up the companies that have failed against Nintendo before, like that list just there, and Nintendo's established dominance in the handheld market. All of that will become relevant as soon as someone gives me a reason why none of that applied when Sony first entered the console market.

    12. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by aderack · · Score: 1

      Jeez. Good going at lumping a portable model of a home console alongside the dedicated handheld platforms.

      I wouldn't exactly call the Genesis a failure. Or even a competitor to the Gameboy.

      --
      -- Aderack. Usually.
    13. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it... Gamecube discs are about that size...

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    14. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About the size of the original Gameboy

      I had one and I would just like to correct you on this point. It was actually about twice as thick as the original GameBoy, and weighed three times as much. Plus, it ate batteries like a motherfucker.

      Mine came with the TV tuner as part of the kit, as well as Bonk's Adventure as the kit game.

      I loved Splatterhouse, Bonk, and all those other games, but what really ate up battery time was Military Madness. Sitting there while the computer is thinking and drying up the AAs (oh yeah, 6 of them, and not wimpy AAAs either) was a surefire way to induce madness.

    15. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real story is that Nintendo was only dominant for all of one generation in home consoles and that was the NES. Sega Genesis pretty much matched SNES 50/50 for the first 3-4 years until SNES brought out hits later on in the cycle like Donkey Kong Country which finally put them on top for that generation.

      Gameboy on the other hand has survived for 16 years without an equal.

    16. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by lordmetroid · · Score: 1

      I just rescently picked up a Virtual boy and all games I could find of reasonable price(below 10k yen) when I was in Japan a couple of weeks ago. Damn, what a pity it flopped! It's the coolest piece of machinery I ever owned!

    17. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jeez. go have sex with someone already! yikes...

    18. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1
      That portable TurboGrafix16 (Name anybody?)
      That would be the PC Engine GT.
    19. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Apparently Nintendo was thinking ahead... maybe. Really, I am skeptical that anything but solid state carts are good for mobile gaming. Sony's PSP is the first to break that model, and it has caused tons of issues: battery life, durability (discs get ejected accidentally), size, and weight.

      The zenith of mobile gaming right now, IMO, is the GBASP. It has backwards compatibility with all of the GB games in addition to the SP games, and it is small and inexpensive.

    20. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Whether Nintendo is thinking ahead or not, I'm not certain, but that would make one hell of a Christmas present to myself. ;)

      I agree with you, though. Carts I think are far better for the portable gamer. There are several arguments that I think are excellent reasons.

      1.) Load times. No Portable Gamer wants load time. As it is, I find it frustrating that it takes me 15 seconds to get into Pokemon.
      2.) Battery Consumption.
      3.) Durability. Not only accidental disc ejections, but we're talking how the games are handled. My GBA sits in my pocket with a handful of games and possibly other artifacts. Even the UMD disc guard would let scratchs go right through.
      4.) Size. Even as small as GC and PSP discs are, they're still many times the (surface area) size of a DS cart--close to twice as big as a GBA cart.

      That's enough reasons for me to prefer a cartridge based system.

      I'd like to point out, though, that the NDS is an amazing piece of hardware, and you may wish to check it out if you get the chance. Yeah, you lose classic GB support, but how much do you play those these days? One thing I don't like about the NDS is that the games are (sometimes) using the 3D processing prowess of the portable system. Sure, Mario 64 looked great, but 3D games just don't look as fly on a 2 inch screen.

      I don't care what anyone says, the NGage failed because the games made ya nauscious... more so than the VirtuaBoy *shivers*. The PSP is a step in the right direction in this aspect, but most people just can't focus on the pretty graphics on a screen that small. For that reason, Cartoon-esque (I'm thinking sprite based, but the Windwakers of the world may qualify, too) style art works wonderfully on a small portable screen.

      /shrug.

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    21. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Huh? Are you saying that the PSX lasted longer because it had games with video on multiple discs.

      I've got news for you: the games were flat out better on the PSX, and there were a lot more of them. That's the reason it was successful.

    22. Re:Corpses in the wake of the big N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "flat out better"?

      Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time were for the N64 - the two games from which every 3D game, even into the next generation, takes a bit of DNA. "Seminal" is the word. Super Smash Brothers. Majora's Mask. Mario Kart 64, man. Goldeneye. Paper fucking Mario. And I'm just listing the legends here.

      I think that having more games was the key. That and: entering the market first, flooding the ad space, building on R&D Nintendo had hired them to do, what was that other thing? Oh, yeah. Final Fantasy 7, arguably still one of the best reasons to buy a Playstation.

      Why did Square decide to break it's long-held dedication to Nintendos consoles? Because the Playstation's disc format allowed them to make games with greater storage space, to facilitate things like FMVs and games on multiple discs. It's almost like that had something to do with the success of the console...or something.

      ------
      I always post AC in Games. Why do you ask?

  23. It's almost as if.. by cbrocious · · Score: 1

    It was a toy or something!

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
  24. movie playing isn't? by Endymion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what, a new, incompatable movie playing format on a portable gaming system isn't a gimic then?

    --
    Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    1. Re:movie playing isn't? by Deitheres · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that PSP movies cost MORE than their DVD counterparts.

      Not a very good way to push a format. At the very least, I think a packaging of DVD+PSP for ~$35 would be better suited than DVD for ~$20 and PSP for ~$20-25. Who would want to pay that much for a movie that you could ONLY watch on a 2" screen? At the very least, Sony could push the sales of the PSP movies if they had built in some kind of audio/video output to the PSP. Maybe like Apple did the older style iBooks that had audio and video integrated in to a 1/8" minijack.

      --
      Just like driving a car:
      (D) to go forward
      (R) to go backward

  25. Yeah but... can it (the PSP) play DS games? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    IMO, the double screen was the best idea Nintendo could ever have. No more having to swap action and map screens...

    And I'm not buying a PSP if my favorite game only comes for the DS...

    From the link:

    "The touch screen comes into play with a new ability where players can "shatter" weak bricks with their finger or stylus, or draw magical symbols to defeat enemy creatures."

    Rune magic, anyone?

    1. Re:Yeah but... can it (the PSP) play DS games? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      The touchscreen support in DoS does seem gimmicky tho. Surely Konami will try to use it to the best, but when it's not one of the core gameplay elements (and it most likely won't), it's a gimmick. A probably fun gimmick but still a gimmick.

      Games like Kirby's Canvas Curse or Metroid Prime Hunters which use the touchscreen+stylus exclusively show it can be indeed a core gameplay element and not a fun added on feature.

      Me and a friend of mine (who recently bought a DS) thought about a game idea which is a 2D platformer (Castlevania style) but the magic is done exclusively with the touchscreen and "rune magic" as you refer to it.
      One of my favorite game types is 2D with "mouse" aiming like the old game "Abuse" (recommended!! partially available free) where the movement is done with the arrows (d-pad) but aiming and shooting is done with the mouse.
      So you could draw runes or scribbled shortcuts to perform magic, directly on your target, using the stylus+touchscreen. Or a simple click on an enemy will perform a normal attack, a line will perform a slash attack and a snake like broken line will shoot a lightning bolt.

      --
      ^_^
  26. My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by hotspotbloc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    IMO Nintendo could gain some new users by partly openning up the DS. It's clear Sony will most likely never open up the PSP.

    -----

    A request for Nintendo to open up the GB DS

    (BTW, is any of this even possible?)

    (Please note that while there is some comparisons between the Nintendo DS (DS) and the Sony Personal PlayStation (PSP) my comments should not be construed as a judgment on which unit has better games or is better for gaming. My comments and ideas are limited to the DS' ability to be expanded past it's current usage, which could possibly expand it's total customer base, and not about corporately generated games. While I mention Python as the interpreter of choice, Ruby should also be strongly considered. BTW, I know the name sucks but I'm sure someone will come up with something better.)



    The "App-Yan"

    I propose that Nintendo makes or allow someone else to make a device that fits into the DS game slot on the DS which allows users to run Python applications. Applications would be stored and loaded from a removable SD card.

    The "App-Yan" parts:

    Hardware:

    External housing design and dimensions: the dimensions would very similar to the "Play-Yan", Nintendo's mp3/mpeg4 player that fits into the GBA slot on the DS.

    SD or SDIO slot: Python scripts and/or related data files would be stored here. No propriety software should be required to copy files to and from the SD card. Open data standards should be used whenever possible. Also somewhat similar to the "Play-Yan".

    >256M non removable internal flash memory: This would be used for the storage of the Python interpreter et al and, at the user's choice, Python scripts or related data.

    A/D converter on the "professional" model: It's about expanding the DS and a "professional" version with multiple A/D converters would expand the DS' use, for example, for automated data collection.

    Software:

    Python interpreter: the Python interpreter, a signed Nintendo application, would be stored on the App-Yan's internal flash memory. It could be updated by Nintendo to address security flaws and bugs. Scripts could be run allowing for a text output or with a full GUI. GUI objects could be accessed from either the DS' internal GUI widgets or from standardized custom widgets accompanied with the interpreter.

    Signed script validator: Some groups have the need to ensure their scripts arrive at the user's DS unmodified. A built in public key signature system could be used to insure scripts arrive as they were intended.


    Why the DS
    ?

    The DS, like previous versions of the GB, is well designed and a nearly indestructible device. They have been successfully used in environments that normally would kill off similar electronic devices. The closest example of a device that can stand up to similar abuse would possible be a "hardened" PDA (either Palm of PocketPC OS based in a custom enclosure) costing at least four times the cost of the DS/AY (DS with an "App-Yan" device). The DS' low cost, durability and touch screens make it an ideal candidate for this project over other portable devices. The use of a GB for nongaming use is hardly new. The Singer Izek sewing machine (now out of production) used a GB as a stitch and pattern controller.

    What's the benefit to Nintendo?

    This project would expand the current customer base and places used. Many would say the "holy grail" of a portable gaming system is to allow for its use in a public school setting. This might be possible using the "dynamically generated exams" example sited below. While the DS performs well as a portable gaming system added uses would generate additional console sales which would generate added games sales. While Nintendo is still the king of the overall handheld gaming market, the Sony PSP has presented itself as extremely strong competition. With Sony's le

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why it has a clam-shell design, so that you can open it up yourself.

      Sorry =)

    2. Re:My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by tepples · · Score: 1

      A request for Nintendo to open up the GB DS

      For one thing, there is no "GB DS".

      For another thing, the Nintendo DS has already been busted wide open. See PassMe.

    3. Re:My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ROFL! Dude, I don't know what drugs you're on, but I want some! Seriously, I love writing code for my DS as much as the next homebrewer, but you'd be foolish to think that I (and the rest of the homebrew community) represent any more than a miniscule fraction of the DS owners out there. The average DS owner couldn't care less if they could write software for their DS. All they want are decent games they can play on the go.

      Meanwhile, opening up the console prevents Nintendo from making money on those development licenses. Moreover, while the licensing model tends to reduce the number of third party developers for the platform, it also results in a much higher quality game library due to the higher barrier of entry (as opposed to the Playstation market, where there are a ton of games, but a small percentage are actually any good).

    4. Re:My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Nintendo does have an advantage though which would make them more likely to open up to homebrew y (though i doubt they ever will). Its the very same reason Sony are not that up for homebrew.
      Nintendo profits off every DS sold ... sony makes a loss for each PSP.

      Though as is my understanding the DS is far more hackable than the PSP in its current state

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:My hopes for the DS - Partly open it up by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      It's a great idea... ...which is precisely why Nintendo won't do it. Don't get me wrong, I'm no Sony fan, but I can't remember the last time Nintendo did something I'd really consider "smart" or "innovative."

  27. New GP32 with Linux by FromWithin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Quite frankly, I think I'd prefer the new GPX2 over either of them. It's the successor to the superb GP32, and plays Xvid, Divx Ogg (and others), out of the box, has 128Mb and an SD slot, USB2, 8 hours of battery time for video playback (2xAA batteries), runs Linux, and actually has emulators (MAME etc.) on the feature list!

    They highly encourage homebrew software.

    1. Re:New GP32 with Linux by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      Sweet Jebus, they added X and Y buttons, with a back-lit screen to boot! that was one of the only reasons that I didn't but a GP32!

      Now if they can get this intro production (photos at that site look like they are all rendered) at a reasonable price, with good emulation, then count me in!

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    2. Re:New GP32 with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


      also the Archos PMA 400, usb/mp3/mpg/divX/Xvid mplayer etc uses Linux and has an SDK so hack away

    3. Re:New GP32 with Linux by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      I'm in, as long as they've got games with as crazy names as the GP32.

      (the link is a screenshot of the title screen of "Dyhard With Infinite Stairs")

    4. Re:New GP32 with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You actually think it will playback video for 8 hours on 2 AA batteries? There is no device that can even come close to that now (even the ones with Lithium Ion batteries can't even get to four hours).

      That's just a bunch of marketing BS and you believed it.

      I hear it also will cost $150 and cures AIDS!

  28. VCR too? by kizzbizz · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the VCR was just another gimmick, too.

  29. When your best game is a gussied up port... by marcybots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in the last three months there have been six games released for the PSP, thats two a month!
          I own a PSP and am very disappointed that the only good games were the launch titles, and many of those games were ports (Tony Hawks Underground 2, Darkstalkers). And I didnt buy a Nintendo DS because I thought nobody was releasing games for it. The sad part is that a bunch of interesting games are out right now in Japan, Some RPGS, which the PSP in America has none of, Astonishia Story, Breath of Fire III, although america is getting one in november, that is a while to wait. Also Japan has just seen some other games released such as Star Soldier, Megaman Dash, Taiko No Tatsujin, Sengoku Ace III-Sengoku Cannon, Heaven Key Earth Gate, Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Popolocrois ponogatari, Shin Mimi Bukuro, Higanjima. Thats not a complete list, those are just the ones that looked interesting to me!
        If sony actually cared about this system, why only release six games in the three months after releasing it? What kind of half-baked strategy is that? Even the prospect of using it for webbrowsing or emulators doesnt seem all that tempting compared to the increasing amount of quality software that seems to be comming out for the nintendo DS, if only the Nintendo DS wasnt the size of a brick I might buy one.

    1. Re:When your best game is a gussied up port... by Itanshi · · Score: 1
      it may be a size of a brick, but since it closes, the screen will last longer than on the psp ^^

      seems the psp is better since it can be hacked more easily mmm and the DS is backwards compatible so... ah well maybe ds 2 will be more psp like and then we'll be happy eh?

    2. Re:When your best game is a gussied up port... by Rotting · · Score: 1

      My PSP was was far more cumbersome when I had it in the metal case that I bought for it. I actually find my DS _more_ portable.

      Nintendo does have a great list of games coming out but it is not like Sony is hurting at all either :)

      With games like Pursuit Force, Virtua Tennis, GTA and Burnout for PSP and Mario Kart, Castlevania, Super Mario and Metroid on the DS, this winter season is going to be probably the most interesting time handheld gaming has ever seen.

    3. Re:When your best game is a gussied up port... by marcybots · · Score: 1

      But will they actually be out in time? I am not so sure. Many DS games have had their release dates postponed and I think many PSP games will as well. But as for why so many PSP games are released in Japan but so few in America, I am totally at a loss for any answers.

    4. Re:When your best game is a gussied up port... by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      The DS can be hacked much more easily than the PSP. Maybe you should google "PassMe" or "WifiMe". How is the hacking going with those 1.51 and 2.0 PSP firmware upgrades?

      --
      This poo is cold.
  30. Some hotspots require a web browser by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Was there any legitimate excuse for DS not having FULL wi-fi capability at launch?

    The Nintendo DS does have full Wi-Fi. It's just that none of the current games use IP over Wi-Fi.

    I don't even mean being able to hack it and use a web browser like PSP, I mean playing online games with people all over world using free wi-fi at Starbucks.

    One problem is that you'd have to use a web browser in order to connect to some hotspots in restaurants and elsewhere, as they will route your packets to the Internet only if you can connect to an SSL web page and read and accept the TOS. Some even need you to enter a code printed on the receipt. That's part of why Nintendo wanted to roll out its own hotspot network before launching IP capable games.

    1. Re:Some hotspots require a web browser by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      One problem is that you'd have to use a web browser in order to connect to some hotspots in restaurants and elsewhere, as they will route your packets to the Internet only if you can connect to an SSL web page and read and accept the TOS.

      You can do WiFi in a peer-to-peer manner, you know. If a device can speak 802.11b, it can act as an access point.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  31. Sniff, sniff by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I smell fear.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Sniff, sniff by karnal · · Score: 1

      by CODiNE (27417)

      That's not fear you smell. You must be high. :P

      --
      Karnal
  32. Yield; PSP firmware by tepples · · Score: 1

    The dual screen rarely brings anything to the device that a larger screen or better use of existing screen real-estate doesn't.

    Yield is an issue with bigger screens. It's a lot cheaper to manufacture two 192x256 pixel screens with fewer than n defects than to manufacture one 384x256 pixel screen. That's part of why the PSP, with its 480x272 pixel screen, had to be delayed in Europe, because Sony couldn't get enough yield out of its LCD supplier and had to divert units from the originally planned European launch to its existing markets in Japan and North America.

    The only thing else I could ask for would be that it played the old GB games, an analogue stick, and maybe a nice emulator (ala PSP). And considering that the PSP has all of those

    You can tell what firmware version a North American PSP has by the letter directly under the voltage on the barcode label. No letter or an 'A' refers to a version that will run homebrew programs such as emulators; a 'B' or later in the alphabet means you have a 1.51 or later firmware revision, which has not been cracked and is not likely to be cracked within the next few months. The problem here is that the retail stores are already sold out of no-letter and 'A' models.

  33. DS a gimmick? by Wazukkithemaster · · Score: 1

    I dont really like the system myself (where's the global competition?) but... based on the arguement put forth here... what does that make the PSP??? blah blah blah BROWSER blah blah blah UMD!!!

    --
    Live according to the Categorical Imperative. If the Categorical Imperative tells you not to live by it... ignore it
  34. Emulation on the GBA by tepples · · Score: 1

    I'm more likely to get another GP32 or a GPX2-F100.. most of the games i'd play are legacy genesis/snes/sms/nes/tg16 games anyways.

    GBA+flash cart plays three out of the five platforms you mentioned: NES, Sega Master System, and PC Engine. Nintendo DS+flash cart+PassMe also plays Super NES games. And Nintendo doesn't change its firmware nearly as often as Sony does.

    1. Re:Emulation on the GBA by gabebear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The DS's firmware isn't flashable in it's normal form, so games can NEVER update the firmware to stop hacks. Once something is working on your DS it will work forever no matter what game you buy in the future.You can still flash the firmware to get rid of the stupid epilepsy warning and allow DS code to run from the GBA cart.

      The red DSs that were just released in China and Japan have an updated firmware that disables older hacks, but those have already been worked around.

    2. Re:Emulation on the GBA by tepples · · Score: 1

      The red DSs that were just released in China and Japan have an updated firmware that disables older hacks, but those have already been worked around.

      Has it? I know Loopy has something working in the lab, but it isn't available for sale on dspassme.com yet. And how long does it take until the new anti-PassMe firmware starts showing up in Nintendo DS systems with gray and blue cases?

  35. Sony is right, in a way by Rolman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even Nintendo regards the DS as just a gimmicky, experimental product and pushes it as a separate architecture from their flagship Game Boy line. So, what's really gimmicky here is the GBA backwards-compatibility in the DS, just to provide it with a temporary library of games to start up with.

    Just play Pac-Pix or Kirby Canvas Curse and you'll see the DS has a future, albeit in its own niche. Furthermore, the touchscreen and the microphone make the DS better suited for Internet gaming than the PSP, however sexy the latter might be. I know the PSP can use external USB devices, but we all know how the market responds to add-ons.

    Sony is just jealous that Nintendo's gimmick product is outselling theirs worldwide, and is actually making a profit. Now imagine when Nintendo announces the next-gen Game Boy.

    The big N's next-gen handheld could use an architecture similar to the Gamecube (as has been rumored) so that the development environment can be shared between the GCN, the Revolution and the GBA2. Things are not going to get any easier for Sony. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if the PSP2 comes with an embedded mic and a touchscreen.

    Now don't take me wrong, I have both devices and love them, but Sony trying to make a stupid comparison at this point can only backfire.

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
    1. Re:Sony is right, in a way by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Even Nintendo regards the DS as just a gimmicky, experimental product and pushes it as a separate architecture from their flagship Game Boy line.

      I don't believe this is true. I can't remember a single piece of hardware that Nintendo has pushed harder. From launch to selling world-wide in under 4 months? That hasn't happened from the big N. (Well, I don't think it has hit China yet, but even that is comming soon)

      Nintendo may consider the DS experimental, but they are not acting like they consider it "just" experimental. Nintendo are marketing it like it's the greatest thing they have ever made.

    2. Re:Sony is right, in a way by Rolman · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is true. I can't remember a single piece of hardware that Nintendo has pushed harder. From launch to selling world-wide in under 4 months? That hasn't happened from the big N.

      Were it not for the GBA compatibility feature, I bet the DS wouldn't have been the huge success it is. The games are great, yes, but there are big gaps between them and look at how the PSP is hurting from a situation like that.

      By the way, the DS is a success but it hasn't sold as well as the flagship GBA line. Look at the sales figures, the first GBA sold 12 million in the first year (67 million in 4 years), and the DS is well under 7 million for the first year. Both the GBA and the GCN were launched in several markets in a relatively short timeframe.

      Furthermore, Nintendo does regard it as experimental (perhaps I emphasized it too much, I'd agree that "just" may not have been the best way to put it) and it goes as far as to call it "Nintendo's Third Pillar" along with the GBA and the GCN. Here's an interesting interview about the new paradigm and an article with Nintendo's president claiming the DS may not be a big seller.

      --
      - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
    3. Re:Sony is right, in a way by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      We still have a few months left in the year so first year sales shouldn't be calculated yet. The GBA was also phenominally successful, and I think that the DS does not have to meet those numbers to be classified an unqualified success.

      Those are a couple of good links, but the comments were made before and as the DS was introduced. I think between E3 2004 and November 21, 2004 Iwata and the brass at Nintendo became much more confident in their vision. Iwata has been talking about the stagnation of the industry for a while, but his vision had not had the oppertunity to show its merit in sales. I'm sure, after the luke warm reception of previous controversial visions like the Wind Waker, he was unsure of the DS's appeal.

      I think Nintendo's former president, Hiroshi Yamauchi, shed a lot of light on this subject with this comment:

      "If we are unsuccessful with the Nintendo DS, we may not go bankrupt, but we will be crushed."

      I've always felt like Nintendo thought the DS was an idea should succeed, but they were worried that the idea was to idealistic for the industry.

      Nintendo may have stumbled upon a recipe for success with the DS, and it may not have worked without a combination of things. I'm sure the backwards compatibility, production capacity, innovative controls, ease of development, copious demo units, price, and games all have played a role. However, from about Oct 2004 onward, Nintendo has held their heads high and have become much more confident.

      It's almost like Iwata said, "Fuck it. If we go down, we will do it our way." Then was suddenly vindicated. I wasn't talking about what Nintendo thought initally. Now it appears that they are looking to the DS as real staple.

    4. Re:Sony is right, in a way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, from a guy or "gurl" that can't spell "too" right, I can't help but not think of the lack of brainpower behind your comments...

      Personally, I can't stand grammar nazi's myself, but come on.

      Granted, I take your comments seriously for all that. Except where you contradict yourself...

    5. Re:Sony is right, in a way by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      Personally, I can't stand grammar nazi's myself, but come on.

      Wait. Do you belong to the grammar Nazi? Oh! That was meant to be a plural! How adorable! Little Billy thinks he knows about grammar.

      Well Billy, you should learn to write with flawless grammar before you point out the mistakes of others.

  36. Gimmicks by Logan+Smith · · Score: 1

    Wireless online play (granted, coming soon) on top of a solid line of first and third party game developers is a gimmick? Wow, so the online games and quality from Nintendo I've been enjoying for years are just gimmicks... ^^

    --
    Logan Smith
  37. Zonk didn't actually link to 1up.com's commentary? by a.different.perspect · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though he said it was "well seen" he didn't bother showing it to us? Even though the ONLY THING SLASHDOT DOES IS LINK TO OTHER SITES IT STILL FAILS AT IT?!?!?

    Go figure.

  38. Access point to what network? by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can do WiFi in a peer-to-peer manner, you know.

    A lot of existing Nintendo DS games do use the ad hoc mode of 802.11b.

    If a device can speak 802.11b, it can act as an access point.

    I thought that in order to act as an access point to a given network, a device had to be able to speak both 802.11b and the layer 2 used by the network (one of Ethernet, DOCSIS, and DSL).

    1. Re:Access point to what network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, but c'mon, this is /. - That's beside the point. :P

  39. Seriously by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    Isn't it the time to create a PSP icon instead of the Gameboy icon currently displayed everytime we have handheld news in /.?

    1. Re:Seriously by WhyCause · · Score: 1
      Nahh, the GameBoy platform is still the handheld of note, primarily due to its longevity. What better way to note this than by displaying the one that brought handheld gaming to the fore? It's the same reason the original Atari joystick is used for general Gaming news; the image has become iconic.

      Plus, the all-black PSP really wouldn't make a very good icon, especially when browsing on a smaller screen.

    2. Re:Seriously by I_Human · · Score: 1

      Didn't we already go over sales figures? Xizer had somewhat of a point, even if he did come off as a bit of a flame. Anyway the old school Game Boy holds the most weight as the handheld icon.

      --
      -JP
  40. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those formats don't appear in our planning. It's not a fair comparison; not fair on them, I should stress. That sounds arrogant, maybe, but it's the truth."

    Translation: "They sold how many copies of that %&^%*^&* electronic dog game??!!"

    If you look back at handheld gaming history, I don't think *any* "widescreen" format (system oriented horizontally instead of vertically) has ever been a big hit.

    Does anyone know of one? Atari Lynx...no. Sega Game Gear...no. Tiger DoubleX-Crapola (or whatever)...no. N-Gage...no. Sony PSP...not looking good.

    The DS does have a better slate of games right now but I really think that the PSP is just too big.

    1. Re:Translation by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look back at handheld gaming history, I don't think *any* "widescreen" format (system oriented horizontally instead of vertically) has ever been a big hit.

      Game Boy Advance sold well even before the SP came out.

    2. Re:Translation by Billy+el+Bastardo · · Score: 1

      the GBA screen was just larger to make it easier on the eyes. PSP is widescreen just to be widescreen without any actual benefits.

  41. Timing by Effugas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Basically, everyone's holding up their games for Christmas, because why release in August if you can sell three times as much in November?

    This has really wiped out the PSP as a platform for the time being, though. Lumines is great but it's not $300 great, and there's nothing else I want, even a little.

    They really should have done the mass-portage, best of PS1/PS2, and dribbled the stuff out until Christmas.

  42. WOW by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    So, NDS is a DRM free, non-proprietary machine.

    1. Re:WOW by tepples · · Score: 1

      So, NDS is a DRM free, non-proprietary machine.

      There is the PassMe adapter. When used with a GBA flash card or a CompactFlash adapter it lets you run homebrew on a DS. And unlike Sony and its firmware-of-the-month club, Nintendo is still selling systems compatible with homebrew.

    2. Re:WOW by cowscows · · Score: 1

      It's not, but then again, Nintendo doesn't advertise it as a full fledged portable media player. It's like Sony can't decide what they want us to be able to do. Ooohhh, the PSP can play movies! But wait, it doesn't play user-created movies full resolution? You have to buy a big-ass, expensive memory stick to put content on it?

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:WOW by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Another thing that the other people who've replied to you didn't point out is that all of Nintendo's portable systems lack region locking. So, you can buy games from all over the world and play them.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:WOW by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

      The reality is, it's the same deal for PSP. Game UMDs are region-free.

  43. GBA SP is just perfect, PSP is cool but useless by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    GBA SP is small, sturdy (I dropped mine many times and it just reset). Screen is protected from damage, it has great battery life, LOADS of great games (FFTA!), homebrew community.

    I bought the PSP. The hardware is undeniably cool. There is total two of decent games - Metal Gear Acid and Untold Legends. Movies are overpriced and I saw almost all of them before. So the thing is gathering dust. I installed bunch of emulators, quake and doom - great games. But Sony is so hostile towards homebrew, which probably is what sells the hardware because official games suck.

    I looked at DS, but DS is FUGLY!

    Now, Gameboy Micro may be interesting.

    1. Re:GBA SP is just perfect, PSP is cool but useless by Bahamut_Omega · · Score: 1

      I've held both the PSP and DS in my hands, and frankly the DS can take more abuse then the PSP. I can say that having a nice little two year old niece can be difficult with a handheld, and the DS can actually take the punishment quite well. Only bad thing that I've seen for the DS would be the stock stylus, which is a real pain to use. Aside from getting a proper stylus from a pda, it is actually one of the better platforms available.

  44. No thanks by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have 3D acceleration.

    1. Re:No thanks by tepples · · Score: 1

      [GPX2] doesn't have 3D acceleration.

      Neither did most PCs when Quake and Quake II were released, but that didn't stop Carmack-san from making kick-*** software rendering engines.

  45. Atari by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 1

    I remeber reading about how the Atari Lynx designers actually totally mocked the Game Boy when it came out. I wonder if History will repeat itself again.

  46. How many handhelds does one Nintendo need? by amrust · · Score: 1

    They had the Gameboy, Gameboy Advance, Gameboy Advance SP, now the Nintendo DS, and soon to come, the Gameboy Micro. Then again, there must be enough people to support the slightly different variations on the same theme.

    I wonder if that's why Sony was so slow to come out with their handheld... because they knew most people with disposable income for a gaming handheld probably already spent their money on one (or more) of Nintendo's myriad other options?

    --
    VOTE!
    1. Re:How many handhelds does one Nintendo need? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first gameboy lasted a long time despite being without a color screen, even came out with a larger, sharper, screen on a slimmer body. Then they upgraded that model to color to tide people over til Atlantis/GBA came out, which they were actually holding out for years before releasing.

      GBA SP is just a better model of GBA, along with Micro(although that's arguable with it's smaller screen, but it really does just fit in the pocket.)

      Nintendo DS is an experiment in their design ethos which Iwata has been evangelizing for the past couple of years.

  47. Hmmmm... by WhiskerTheMad · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is the Japanese equivalent of "Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers! Developers!"

    --
    Love your country always, but respect your government only when it deserves it. -- Mark Twain
  48. Correction! by eMartin · · Score: 1

    Whoops!

    That second line should read:

    Betacam SP is very high quality...

    Should have previewed that.

  49. My thoughts exactly by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I just got back from Best Buy, where there was a rack full of PSP shovelware--crappy movies re-released on UMD, in the laughable hope that someone will want to pay $25 again to watch a movie on a 4" screen.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  50. Love my DS... by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1


    The DS is far from a gimmick. What's really going on is Sony is shocked that their "superior" handheld device isn't selling so well at all (latest numbers for last week show the DS selling more than all other game systems combined in Japan, where Sony *should* be doing better).

    It's kinda like why the iPod sells so well over the competing MP3 players. The iPod plays music. It does it well. No need for all these other "features". In the same way, the DS lets you play really fun games. That is all. It doesn't try to be everything to everyone like the PSP. And we see the results...

    I don't *want* to watch movies on the go. I don't want to run Linux or whatever on the go. I want my handheld gaming device to just play games.

    And now the DS is only $129. What a bargain, IMHO. Oh, and Nintendogs is just plain *fun*. Just wait until WiFi networked Mario Kart and Metroid Hunters. Oh man, what a time ahead for us DS owners...

    --
    --- witty signature
    1. Re:Love my DS... by catprog · · Score: 1

      Just a point the ds runs linux http://www.dslinux.org/ while the psp is way behind and problay will only run on version 1.5 http://www.psp-linux.org/

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
  51. Company exec trashes competitor's product by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    No film at 11, you've all seen it before a hundred times...

    Seriously, is this really newsworthy?

    1. Re:Company exec trashes competitor's product by Askjeffro · · Score: 1

      You found it worthy enough to reply to...

  52. Hey! by jfengel · · Score: 1

    Spotted dick has a funny name, but the ingredients are actually pretty innocuous, and it's pretty tasty.

    "Liver and lights", on the other hand...yeek. Can't say as I've ever had it, but I'd try it. Once.

    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. You don't do anal.

  53. They are aimed at different markets you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The psp and ds are aimed at diffent markets, its pretty clear that the ds is aimed at a younger audience while the psp is marketed as a fashion accesory.

    The dual screen....its pretty much useless, while the touch is innovative its not big step up from the gba. THe DS is also very thick.

    The psp is more innovative, it has a very large bright screen however it does have problems. The buttons and placement are not as great as they can be. The psp also feels pretty delicate.

    As for the games, it depends on what your into. The psp has great games coming out (LC stories), the ds has the classics (some of which are getting tiresome).

    The major problem is that the DS is 130 usd and the psp 250. If your a mom which one are you going to buy for your kid, the cutesy cheap one or the delicate expensive one?

  54. Whatever by dr.banes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure its a little gimmicky...so is the PSP. They added all of these features and look what happens...people use it other than to play their games. Also, this shrunken down PS2 is seems to be a dump for ports,rehash after rehash.I already own a PS2 and dont need another one. Meanwhile...back at headquarters, Nintendo said lets make a game with dogs that you can talk to and touch with our new gimmicky 2nd screen and bang its a hit. What about that new surgery game thats coming out, use the stylus to operate...gimmicky but again its a hit. Sony needs original titles that are fun, period.

  55. Five years, not ten by tepples · · Score: 1

    It took the rest of the industry 10 years to catch up to the turbografx handheld.

    I count only five years between the PC Engine GT (1990; released in North America in 1991 as TurboExpress) and the Sega Nomad (1995).

    1. Re:Five years, not ten by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you're right, forgot about that. Ok, so 5 years.

    2. Re:Five years, not ten by pnice · · Score: 1

      Well, the atari lyxn could function in 8 or 16 bit mode and it was released in 1989, the same year as the Gameboy.

    3. Re:Five years, not ten by tepples · · Score: 1

      Well, the atari lyxn could function in 8 or 16 bit mode

      No, just 8-bit. Its cpu was a 6502, similar to the one in the NES or the PC Engine. It had a more powerful video chip capable of doing Wolfenstein-esque texture mapping into a frame buffer, but that video model was hard for programmers of the day, who were trained on tiles and sprites and scanline rasterization of the NES, SMS, and Game Boy, to get used to. In addition, the 160x102 pixel screen of the Lynx was blockier than the 160x144 pixel screens in the Game Boy and Game Gear systems. But what really killed it was Atari's notoriously crappy marketing.

    4. Re:Five years, not ten by pnice · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. I somehow talked my parents into getting me a Lynx "Deluxe Package" back in the day. I'm not sure how I talked them into spending the money on it but I enjoyed it while I had it (as long as I had it plugged into the wall and not running on batteries.)

  56. It *was* a tough decision... by WhiskerTheMad · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I debated for a good while about which handheld to buy: PSP or DS? That's a tough one.

    But then Sony started playing hardball with the hackers out there, with every firmware upgrade trying to lock hackers out of their precious, perfect PSP. (I apologize for alliteration, it was assuredly accidental)

    Fine, Sony. I won't hack your hardware to do crazy things like install linux or watch movies. I'll buy a DS instead (go DSLinux!)

    It's a very effective strategy, guys!

    --
    Love your country always, but respect your government only when it deserves it. -- Mark Twain
  57. My Recommendation for Europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
        I purchased a PSP on opening day and several game titles as well. But I haven't touched it in over six weeks now! There just aren't enough new game titles for it that interest me.

        I would recommend that Europeans take a good look at the titles they might be interested in and then decide whether or not to purchase the unit.

        Personally... I can't recommend the PSP at present. You've waited this long, waiting a few more months to see if any new games come out for the winter holidays shouldn't kill ya.

        I mainly use it, now, with PSP Video 9; but as I mentioned I haven't done that either for some six weeks. Plus, I ain't paying for a video twice! Sony should be bundling the UMD movie discs with their DVD titles!

        Also, wait and see if the GBmicro comes with the SD A/V Cartridge... if it does I'm selling my PSP - unless... Linux is ported to the PSP.

    --
    KFF

  58. Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's something really sad about people throwing away 250$ on a trashy PSP in a world where thousands of people starve to death each day.

    You make me sick.

    1. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I don't spend every cent of my disposable income on helping others I make you sick?

      Please...

    2. Re:Ugh. by cornface · · Score: 1

      Because I don't spend every cent of my disposable income on helping others I make you sick?

      You're not even human.

  59. Hmmm.. by agraupe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just bought a DS the other day. It doesn't seem like much of a gimmick to me. The games are solid, and the touch screen is innovative. It's also $100 cheaper (in Canada at least). So far, the game selection looks better. Other than the GTA game, there's no advantage the PSP has in terms of upcoming games. Also, I think Sony has a lot of balls calling anything a gimmick when part of their strategy involves people buying special copies of movies, and watching them on a small screen.

    1. Re:Hmmm.. by cnerd2025 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I couldn't agree with you more, agraupe. I love my DS. In fact, I received it as a gift, somewhat ignorant about its features. I immediately fell in love with it, beating the included Super Mario 64 in about a week after playing it non-stop. I loved how game-centric Nintendo seemed, and I have always admired that about the company. They don't make PDAs and they don't make home entertainment systems (although playing DVDs would be just a little helpful on GC); Nintendo makes systems to play games.

      When I saw the PSP, I laughed my ass off. They cut their prime customers by including only one joystick! I recall saying, "Sony, say goodbye to -shooters!" Critics, of course, argue that DS is no more fit to handle shooters, but I disagree. Having played Metroid Prime: First Hunt on DS, the touch screen is perhaps the best addition to a handheld system that is possible. Not only does it provide extra information, but interface is extremely good. I think Sony is just a sad company now. They used to make such good stuff, and some of their stuff is still. I have a VAIO, and it works like a tramp (although I'm looking for an open source TV Tuner driver for the included "GigaPocket" hardware.) A lot of Sony's systems, though, do include gimmicks. Even when I got this computer, I thought the included TV tuner was somewhat of a gimmick, although it turns out now that almost all computers come standard (I got this one long before this was the case).

      In favor of innovating, Sony has taken the Microshaft approach: "we'll call you names if you don't fall down, bend over, and take our big-money, Viagra-hungry chode in the ass." I'm tired of this big-time corporate-rhetoric shit. There is no reason for it. It's more interesting to watch little kids with this type of thing because a) they come up with better reasons and b) they're actually developing in the process (you can tell the child that his or her actions were completely inappropriate, and take further action if necessary). Fortunately we can beat Sony (and Microshaft) with a switch too; Andrew Jacksons have a very sharp sting when used as switches. And about the aforementioned innovation, Nintendo included many interesting interfaces with the DS. Not only did they include the separate screen, but the built in mic, with the optional headset port, as well as the Ni-Fi|Wi-Fi, GBA cartridge slot, touch sensitive enabled screen, and dual processors. Alternatively, Sony included the WiFi, huge screen (terrible for batteries), ONE joystick, the proprietary and utterly shitty MemoryStick, and the stupid (also proprietary) UMD format to accomadate movies as well as games! On the small screen! Tell me that is not a gimmick. Now they're selling shoddy games that have full web browsers included. Tell me that is not a gimmick. We are gamers, not friggin PDA users.

      So much high-octane hardware is in PSP that Sony loses sight of innovation. Even though it's so turbocharged with huge LCD screen and yada yada, DS is still a more powerful system. This seems counterintuitive, but think about this: earlier this week, a few days ago a game called "Nintendogs" was announced for release in the US. At first I thought they had to be kidding. This game sounded like Pokemon all over again, just much lamer. You basically take care of a dog. But then I looked at this game. I saw the screen shots and I read the review, both of the game and the functionality. I am actually considering this game, since I have no time nor space for a dog, and since it is so intriguing. I love the idea of using my voice to command the dog, the touchscreen to "interact" with the dog, and the ability to direct my own play. It's genius. No gimmick there. A better gaming experience is what I get. Despite the lackluster performance on their last console system, Nintendo is clearly following a much better business model, adapting and innovating; it is clearly an example of the best of capitalism.

      I would also like to mention that Zonk's posting style was superb. Post the facts, then the opinions. I'm not sure if anyone is familiar with www.stratfor.com, but they follow this same approach: facts, then analysis/opinion. Good work, Zonk.

      Finally, what is Japanese for "go fuck yourself?"

    2. Re:Hmmm.. by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Finally, what is Japanese for "go fuck yourself?"

      kutabare: (exp) (X) (vulg) fuck you!, shove it!, go to hell!, drop dead!
      from the verb kutabaru: (v5r) (col) to die, to be exhausted, (P)

      zakenayo: (exp) (X) (vulg) fuck you!, "don't fuck around", "don't be a screw off"
      (I think) street-speak from the verb fuzakeru: (v1) to romp, to gambol, to frolic, to joke, to make fun of, to flirt
      in impolite negative form + exclamation

      It's considered rather vulgar, so don't use it if your own honor is important to you.

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:Hmmm.. by agraupe · · Score: 1

      Nintendogs is very cool. I suggest you buy it, if you think you might like the idea. I bought it at the same time as I bought my DS, and it's amazing.

  60. Re:Zonk... by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Oh, but the "PSP sucks" and "PSP doomed" articles are just part of Zonk's output. The rest is ads for the Nintendo DS, such as today's ads for Metroid Prime: Hunters and Nintendogs.

    The guy's clearly a raving Nintendo fanboy, and all semblance of balance has long gone.

    (Speaking as someone who owns a GameCube and a Game Boy Advance.)

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  61. golliwog by u-238 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know that, for the most part, comments like Harrisons are just the marketing version of "my processor is faster than yours" but I'm honestly surprised at the level of arrogance displayed there. Since the PSP's launch, Slashdot Games has posted article after article with titles like PSP Reception Lukewarm in U.S., PSP Not A Sellout Hit, What's Up With The PSP?, and most recently PSP Usage Lower Than Expected. This last article is especially disheartening for Sony execs because those numbers come from Japan, a nation that has traditionally been Sony's bread basket. If it's not doing well here, and it's not doing well there...do they really think that many Europeans are going to buy it when it launches there next week?

    I wonder, and I'm being very sincere here - when the last time Zonk ever partook in sexual intercourse.

  62. Re:Zonk... by tepples · · Score: 1

    The guy's clearly a raving Nintendo fanboy, and all semblance of balance has long gone.

    Is my buyer's guide more or less biased than Zonk's articles?

  63. New version of DRM by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    (This starts off slightly off topic, but just bear with me a little bit)
    I'm really no expert here, but I know that these days everyone is complaining that someone is stealing their music, or movies, or something... Even their games, I bet. Let's face it, tech solutions like some new encryption won't last long, they havent historicly, and I see no reason for that to change. The same holds true to gameboy games. Untill now you could find some emulator and play any gameboy rom you could download, or even make from your gameboy games. I liked to say I was "demoing" the game, but the reality was that I wasn't about to run out, spend 200$ on the latest hand held system, and then pay 30$ for each game.

    So where does the DS fit in? Well, I'd like to see you emulate it. With past game boys, you needed like 10ish buttons. Now, you need two screens, one of which needs to be touch screen, etc. Now like I said before, I am no expert, but emulating all of that would bea a huge pain in the butt and it still woudlnt work as well as owning the system.

    Maybe Nintendo saw that games were next on the list of things people would pirate and decided to stop it before it started. Now let's see the music or movie industry come up with some new innovation that makes me want to own their product, and NO, I do NOT mean 500 hours of crap interviews, special features, or whatever you call it.

    Just my two cents.

    --
    Scott Swezey
    1. Re:New version of DRM by cornface · · Score: 1

      Keyboard: maps to buttons and d-pad.

      Mouse: draws on the emulated touchscreen.

      Phew, solved that one!

    2. Re:New version of DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn beat me to the fscking obvious answer :P

    3. Re:New version of DRM by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

      Mouse != stylus

      Sorry, but the real thing is still probably easier to use.

      --
      Scott Swezey
    4. Re:New version of DRM by cornface · · Score: 1

      And PC gamepad != every arcade control set ever made, but you know what? It works great for playing MAME. And SNES. And SMS. And GBA. And NES. And Genesis.

      Of course the real thing works better. Did you just get back from genius academy? The advantages in emulation aRe nOt Mainly Screen related.

    5. Re:New version of DRM by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point, its not the ability to emulate it, its the experience... the DS offers a better experience than emulating it, which GBA, MAME, SNES, etc emulators do not.

      I was simply pointing that out, and suggesting other industry's try the same line of thinking, weather or not it was intentional.

      It really is no wonder that so many people flame all of the flamers here now.

      PS: Don't bother with a reply, cornface.

      --
      Scott Swezey
    6. Re:New version of DRM by cornface · · Score: 1

      PS: Don't bother with a reply, cornface.

      Okay.
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      Crap!

  64. Ahhhh - the ostrich marketing ploy strikes again by dotoole · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sony must have hired the former Iraqi Minister for Information for their PR.

    "The DS is no threat to our superior PSP! Our valiant PSP will outsell it at every turn!"

  65. As another DS owner by IoN_PuLse · · Score: 1

    I think the dual screens really add to some games, and make some possible that simply weren't ever before. Games like the upcoming Animal Crossing DS are actually much more suited for dual-screen than single screen (like the GC version). The touchscreen is also wonderful, but I see you agree with me there :)

  66. Isn't this entire article flamebait? by veganopolis · · Score: 1

    All this does is stir up attention and it doesn't provide any benefit to anyone. What is the deal?

    1. Re:Isn't this entire article flamebait? by tduff · · Score: 1

      Isn't all of /. flamebait?

  67. Another attempt for Slashdot to be more by chrysrobyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see any posters at this time who have recognized Zonk's post for what it is -- an attempt for Slashdot to be more than just a blog. The last major push for that backfired, nobody liked what Jon Katz had to say. Since day 1, Slashdot has been an approval system for links that we the readership submit. The editors have made some attempts to editorialize and have occasionally been flamed for it, but the editorials have been very light and Slashdot's readership has been flat for over a year.

    Slashdot can continue to mature and grow readership by doing a little research. Dig up some links from the past and make a comment. Zonk could have taken a small step in either direction by posting how well (or not) the DS has done to continue to refute Sony's stance (or show that the issue is still unresolved).

    Thanks, Zonk, for taking a small step in the right direction. We don't want a Slashdot newspaper, over-editorializing everything, but some light commentary would entice readers to get our feet wet in new subjects and make Slashdot an easier read for new visitors.

    1. Re:Another attempt for Slashdot to be more by cornface · · Score: 1

      It's easy to get lost in the 19,000 articles Zonk posts every day. Your comments would also be more valid if the bulk of the article wasn't copied and pasted from 1up.com, which shows up so often that it seems to be a paid relationship.

      If it's not a paid relationship, Zonk really needs to expand his web browsing horizons.

  68. ROFL! Is this a joke? by GFLPraxis · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=14588 3

    The DS is outselling the PSP by 4 times in Japan and has a 1.2 million unit lead worldwide. "Irrelevant" my foot.

  69. Re:Zonk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you not forget his raving review of Kirby Canvas Curse that was posted on the front page of Slashdot.

    I don't go to read Slashdot game reviews and most gamers already know the majority of gamer's love that game.

  70. News Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony is right. DS's games are glorified tech demos

  71. That was easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For an encore Sony goes on to prove that black is white, and is run over at the next zebra crossing.

  72. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How many original games for the PSP can you name?

    Sure, a few here and there. But most of the PSP games are remakes and PS2 adaptations.

    Personally, I like to see new things, not re-buy old ones..

  73. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DS can be pretty nice if it means dick sucking. I'll take that gimmick anyday.

  74. Wait.... by Solr_Flare · · Score: 1

    Didn't Sony say, back during the PSP launch, that their target market wasn't the same as the DS so they weren't concerned about the DS because it wasn't a "competitor"?

    Now, of course, we all knew that was a marketing lie. Sony was just covering their butts for the most likely scenario of the PSP getting some market share but Nintendo still dominating. Which, by the way, is exactly what has happened.

    Still, it really is funny to see marketing angles and approaches contradict each other so sharply in the time span of less than a year. It really shows how Sony needs to get their act together as these days they tend to knee jerk react instead of putting together a comprehensive long term plan and stick with it. They hurt themselves more than their competitors ever could alone.

    --
    You are who you are, let no one tell you different. But, never close your mind to a new point of view.
  75. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by arose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sony: I CAN'T HEAR YOU!

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  76. DS is too far behind. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know some of you will crap in your nintendo undies when you read this, but hear me out...

    DS is old technology. It's a portable N64 going for $150. WTF?

    For $100 more, you can have a portable PS2. THINK ABOUT IT for just a minute. When you compare dollar by dollar to the technology you're paying for, you are paying too much for the DS.

    Which is the better deal... hmmm...

    DS has the stylus, and while many might think otherwise for a second, it IS a gimmick. Oh, it's not, you say?

    PLEASE tell me how it's not. I will admittedly shut my mouth and admit fault if you can tell me how the stylus and dual screens alone are "innovative" as opposed to the "wow" gimmick factor. I challenge you.

    Nintendo in recent years has been notorious for gimmicks. An immediate one off the top of my head was... Metroid Prime. Anyone, anyone? Oooh, plug your GBA in with Metroid Fusion and play with SPECIAL SAMUS!!! *cream* Hah.

    What about the Final Fantasy chronicles? Plug your GBA in, get special stuff that other people cannot. Oooh.

    What about paying for Mario all over again just because it's portable? or $20 for the "classics" series - The Legend of Zelda. Hah. That shit should come on ONE disc with 20 other games for $20.

    C'mon.. where are the supposed hit games? Mario 64? Yeah, I played that 9 years ago. Give me something new.

    Nintendo needs to get their shit together.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:DS is too far behind. by Eddy+Da+KillaBee · · Score: 1

      And where are the hit games for PSP? I owned a PSP for months and the only games I liked were NFSU: Rivals, Midnight Club Dub Edition, and Ridge Racer. Not that I'm NOT a racing genre fan either; but where the hell were my PSP games? Let's see, I saw TONS of movies available, but few games, and many outright sucked.

      Yeah, for the DS, Nintendo DOES need to get their shit together. But so does Sony. I bought the PSP to play games, not WATCH OLD MOVIES.

    2. Re:DS is too far behind. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      You're right - the PSP doesn't have many hits just yet, but take a peek at releases that are just around the corner (at IGN for example..)

      Many of the PSP games coming out are not only unique titles (GTA: Liberty City Stories), but are ports of RECENT games - The Sims2, Jak & Daxter, THUG2, and others that are SPOT ON.

      DS? Nintendogs... Mario 64... and other ports of recent games that look horribly N64ish (also Sims 2).

      Final Fantasy III is seeing light with DS, and I'll give it that...

      However, while my first post may seem trollish, the DS doesn't provide much for your dollar. The games may be fun in a kiddie sort of way, but it's just too far behind with what it CAN provide in the future. You're paying not only for old technology (Mario 64), but dumbed down NEWER technology.

      They are more or less extending the N64 and hoping to make some unique titles for it that will catch on... but I can promise you it won't happen.

      The UMD thing IS pretty stupid though, I agree.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    3. Re:DS is too far behind. by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      Have you actually played any DS games? The touchscreen is not a gimmick, but a cool new way to play fun games.

      You spent a lot of words there pointing out supposed negatives about the DS. Why not try listing advantages of the PSP? Like be sure to list the huge amount of popular games. And be sure to bring up sales numbers that must be spectacular because it's better than the DS. Oh, wait...

      --
      --- witty signature
    4. Re:DS is too far behind. by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      The DS isn't a portable N64. It just happens to have a few N64 games ported to it. The hardware is a different architecture.

    5. Re:DS is too far behind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You left out the most gimmicky of all Nintendo gimmicks: the analog stick. Boy, did that idea crash and burn.

    6. Re:DS is too far behind. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, having good games is just a marketing gimmick. If you weren'y stupid, you'd buy the machine with the best stats.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    7. Re:DS is too far behind. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      DS is old technology. It's a portable N64 going for $150. WTF?

      For $100 more, you can have a portable PS2. THINK ABOUT IT for just a minute. When you compare dollar by dollar to the technology you're paying for, you are paying too much for the DS.


      This is, of course, blatantly ignoring the fact that the DS is more powerful than the N64 and the PSP is not actually as powerful as the PS2. And handheld systems such as the Game Gear, TurboExpress, WonderSwan Color, and NGage have shown us that the portable market is all about power.

      PLEASE tell me how it's not. I will admittedly shut my mouth and admit fault if you can tell me how the stylus and dual screens alone are "innovative" as opposed to the "wow" gimmick factor. I challenge you.

      A touch-sensitive screen allows the user to precisely identify and manipulate objects on a screen in ways that would be impossible with a traditional crosspad and buttons. You can basically do anything with a stylus that you can with a mouse; ask yourself, are computer mice just a "wow" gimmick, or do you think that some day they might actually become indispensible tools?

      Your other points are blatant trolling, but I will also address this:
      C'mon.. where are the supposed hit games?

      Over 50 DS titles are scheduled to be released by the end of the year. Personally, from just that list I'm particularly looking forward to Lunar, Phoenix Wright, MMBN5, Animal Crossing, and Castlevania: DoS, but there might be others that could surprise me. I also know of at least one other I'm interested in, Lost in Blue, that's not on the list.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    8. Re:DS is too far behind. by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. Guys, I've debated with this loser before. Droopy thinks the following: #1 Anybody who doesn't like FPS, M rated games, and other boring games is kiddy and has no taste. #2 ALL gamers are males 14-30 years old who like the games above. You see, he has no perspective. He doesn't realize that MANY people have different tastes in games. I don't have a problem with the PSP. I won't get one because it's not for me. I enjoy games like Nintendogs and Kirby. Many people like Nintendogs. We are seeing a gaming revolution where games are no longer just for immature young males, but for everyone. My wife and I enjoy what Nintendo has put out and graphics are good enough for me.

    9. Re:DS is too far behind. by taskforce · · Score: 1
      I don't agree with everything the parent said... but if you're arguing for the DS on terms of sheer power of the console then you've gotta be having a laugh.

      The Nintendo DS certainly doens't have more power than the N64, and it's stretching it to say that it has the same power. Take a look at Splinter Cell for the DS. This is not a good game, but it's what happens when you try and pull a fully functional 3D game on the DS where there character can do more than jump. The N64 was certainly capable of that.

      I was talking to my friend who works for EA last week about this subject... previously I was quite skeptical as to whether the PSP actually had the power of a PS2. It doesnt; he said it has about 95% of the capability. But he also said this is offset by the resolutions you can get away with running games at on a small portable screen. The PSP is capable of graphics like GT4 Mobile... that alone should be an indicator that it's pretty damn close to the PS2.

      Graphics aren't everything, but if you're going to argue about them, at least know what you're talking about.

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    10. Re:DS is too far behind. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      No, you think I think that.

      Like I established in the past, you're a closed minded fucking moron and obviously you can't move on.

      Move the fuck on.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    11. Re:DS is too far behind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny, but reading your past comments, i can't see where the OP said anything derogative about games 'other than' fps, m rated, etc.

      i did, however, notice you have some issues and cant seem to grasp the point of discussion. you keep mentioning your wife (why?) and assume m games are bad and apply only to 'single males age x-y' even though you have never played a single one.

      i think this post sums it up:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157375&cid=132 24630

    12. Re:DS is too far behind. by Yosho · · Score: 1

      Just because somebody made a shoddy port doesn't mean it's a weak system; if you want a counter-example, take a look at the port of Mario 64, which is, for the most part, exactly the same game, except it has more content and a higher texture resolution.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  77. Way to go, Sony by Blaaguuu · · Score: 1

    is this the way Sony view the game industry? anything different, and innovative is a gimmick? no wonder i dont buy Sony consoles anymore...

    --
    My hand touched her hand. Her hand touched her boob. By the transitive property, I got some boob! Algebra is awesome!
  78. Does he know what the word means? by torpor · · Score: 1

    Gimmick; "A trick or device intended to attract attention, publicity, or business"

    ummm .. state the obvious much? pretty much ALL consumer electronics toys are gimmicks, yo. goes for the PSP, goes for the DS, hell .. it even goes for my crappy JVC camcorder.

    electronic toys have been in the land of the 'gimme' gimmick for years. Sony themselves are masters at it...

    Nice fluff piece though.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  79. Whoa, what? by Strell · · Score: 1

    You are actually arguing pure technology against technology as your standpoint here? "It's a portable PS2 versus a portable N64" and that's your entire argument?

    Wow. While we're being nonsensical, let's call Metroid Prime a gimmick by dismissing the ENTIRE GAME and focusing on something THAT IS A BONUS, but refuse to call the PSP's movie playing gimmick - which is ALL it is and SADLY the biggest selling point.

    Please come back when you can attempt to make a coherent point. Don't make a bunch of assumptions and wild tangents when none of them hold water.

    --
    I'm not scared of anonymous cowards.
    1. Re:Whoa, what? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      No, Metroid Prime is great. One of my fav games.

      The gimmick lies in the "hey, if you buy a GBA you get to play as samus with a colorful suit" and vice versa: "Hey, you can play the original metroid!"

      Why not just unlock it so everyone can do it? What does a GBA have to do with either one? It's not a "bonus".

      That is what a gimmick is, and that is the point of this article: Nintendo is notorious for it in recent years.

      As stated in another post of mine, the UMD is ridiculous. I hate it and everything it tries to be.

      However, Sony has been innovative: PS2 allowed for widespread DVD usage - not only was the console a kickass next-gen system, it was also a DVD player, something that most people didn't have at the time (2000).

      You need to think of the future - what you will get are N64 equivalent games and PORTS that you have played before as opposed to current hits, such as THUG2, Sims 2, or any other hot selling PS2 title that they wanna push over to portable.

      Have you played the Metroid Prime: Hunters demo? I mean... it's ugly. It's a BAD port.. just like THPS was to GBA. Some things just DON'T work, and that's one of em.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    2. Re:Whoa, what? by Strell · · Score: 1

      You're claiming the DS is nothing more than an extension of the N64, and I have a problem with this for two reasons: the first and obvious being that the gameplay of the DS cannot be replicated on the N64 (or even the big mighty PS2), and the second being that if that were the case (pay attention to that phrase, it's operative and vital), then we'd be seeing a LOT more ports of N64 games.

      As it stands, there has been an obvious number (Mario 64, Animal Crossing, Mario Kart), but the number is extraordinarily small compared to the number of rehashes on the PSP. What is the honest difference from NFS on the PSP versus the PS2/Xbox/GC? Meanwhile, the online component alone will make for wildly different gameplay in the DS incantations. You can call them a port, sure, but it is of a different ilk than what is happening on the PSP.

      As for the future, the fact is that there are more games on the DS far more interesting to me. You say it yourself - the PSP will host ports of recent games. How is that good? Outside of GTA I can't imagine people having raging hard ons to play Sims 2, especially when the experience can be replicated fairly well on the DS (thanks to EA and their "principles," but that rant is for another day).

      But then you turn around and say IMMEDIATELY that Metroid Hunters isn't worthwhile because "it's ugly." But I thought you were talking about game quality? Gameplay? Or are you just boiling it down to graphics? Because you're saying 2-3 things now and they are all in direct contrast to each other. Hunters isn't even meant to be a port - the control is brilliant and my guess is that it will suit itself better than anything the PSP will ever hope to emulate. Coded Arms, anyone? Yea, I played Quake 10 years ago too....

      The PS2's ushering of DVD is a nice idea, and now pretty much standard in all systems. That makes me wonder how much longer it will be before we start seeing touch control from competitors? My guess is not very long.

      As far as "looking to the future goes," I can't help but point out that despite how much you hack that away at that, the vast majority of PSP users are either 1) watching movies, or 2) playing emulators. Look to the future indeed. AWRIGHT, I GOT MARIO 3 ON MY PSP. Rock on, Sony. Rock rock on.

      Finally, on the "gimmick GBA" front, Nintendo is very clear about that - the GBA userbase far outnumbers the GC fanbase (or the Xbox, PS2, etc etc etc) and they simply think that if you happen to own both consoles, you might want to get some added functionality out of the games you buy for it. Gimmicky yes, but it never acts like that is the main selling point of their games. I don't remember Metroid Prime's commercial highlighting the GBA connectivity as a main selling point - it was probably hinted at, but they didn't devote seconds to it. That's why it's a gimmick - it's an add on. That is not even remotely close to the DS or it's style of play.

      --
      I'm not scared of anonymous cowards.
  80. Re:Zonk... by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Well, I've posted before about the PSP not being on display anywhere. I haven't seen a reason to get a PSP yet; I'd probably like WipeOut Pure, but I'm not going to drop $300 on an unseen system to play it.

    I'd be much more likely to get the PSP if it was opened up to 3rd party developers, though.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  81. Of course the DS is gimmicky by MilenCent · · Score: 1

    Of course it is. Video games have always had that element of Da Gimmick. Donkey Kong Jungle Beat is gimmicky. EyeToy looks pretty gimmicky to me. Portable gaming would look gimmicky if we weren't used to it.

    But the fact is, a good gimmick can make a game. Everything new looks like a gimmick. It is, in fact, but that doesn't mean it can't also be cool.

    Not all gimmicky things are cool, of course. When "gimmick" is used as a deogratory term, the implication is that there's nothing else there. Which may have been true at first, but now... well, Kirby proved a lot of things. It may sell less than Advance Wars DS and Nintendogs, but it was the game that proved that, with solid design, the DS really does have new things to show the world of gaming. It's the most important DS release so far.

    The coolest things have always looked gimmicky at first. If you're going to deride something solely because of its newness then you have a sad outlook on the world.

  82. Other great Sony Inovations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardware wise sure it's superior, but so is other Sony inovations like Betamax and the MiniDisc, and those are all still kicking around today, Am I right!

    1. Re:Other great Sony Inovations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MiniDisc was huge in Asia, especially Japan. It basically eliminated tape-based walkmans. And like those walkmans before it, it is being supplanted by MP3 players.

    2. Re:Other great Sony Inovations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wasn't putting down mini-disc, In america Mini-disc didn't sell well. Infact I'm a proud owner of a Sharp mini-disc that I brought around to record live recordings. I would have got a Sony but I don't trust anything Sony makes with moving parts... I've had dozens of Sony products Walkmens, Cd-players a VCR and my Playsation all made by Sony which failed withing a year of owning them.

      Sony does a few things right but when it comes to manufactoring, they tend to take a cheap route

  83. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    The DS is outselling the PSP by 4 times in Japan and has a 1.2 million unit lead worldwide. "Irrelevant" my foot.

    I believe the reference was to the weird little GameBoy Micro they just released; and I'm inclined to agree with the Sony guy actually, it is a gimmick. However you are totally correct in saying Sony really has no history to stand on and make such comments.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  84. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1

    Actually nevermind - he was talking about the touch screen. I take it back.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  85. Two for the price of one.. by SixFingeredMan · · Score: 1

    I just purchased two Nintendo DS systems with Nintendogs for myself and my wife.

    Bravo Nintendo! Fie on Sony!

    We've spent more time playing our DS machines in two days than we ever spent playing games on the PSP. Aside from the technological advantange, the PSP is boring and lacks decent games. Or is it just a glorified movie player with a small screen?

  86. Nintendo's "entry"? by Airconditioning · · Score: 1

    Nintendo have been doing hand-helds for a damn long time... even before the Gameboy. Give them a little credit.

  87. PSP, it's good, but needs better marketing. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

    I enjoy my PSP, a lot, but...disclaimers follow:

    I owned a PSone with screen and battery packs for it. My favorite game to play on it when in wating roms and the like was the PSone port of Diablo, due to the save at any time feature of that game.

    Let me tell you that thing got attention. The large bright screen, the same games you can play at home. People would ask where they could get a screen and packs for their PSones. I told them, and also told them the price, which caused people to wince.

    And now there's the PSP. People marvel at that screen and the games and what it can do, but when you tell them the price they wince. To me it's a steal, $250 for what it does. But non-geeks, they don't realize that, and SCEA's marketing hasn't helped much.

    1. The games cost too much in many people's eyes. Thanks to Nintendo, people think portable games should cost $29.99 or less. And Sony thinks that by telling people that the PSP's games are almost PS2 quality that customers will pay more. But... people are resisting that.

    2. To get the most out of your PSP you need a PC and a wireless connection. A lot of people don't have that.

    3. The PSP "looks" fragile and delicate and some people worry about it. (It's really not that delicate)

    4. Sony hasn't done a good job of explaining what the PSP can do. (Even the PSP manual is lacking in this respect) Making the best use of a PSP requires computing literacy and frankly a lot of people seem to be lacking in that department I was very much surprised that the PSP did not ship with SonicStage and ImageConverter on disc for ones PC. Heck I'm surprised that Sony isn't offering a SonicStage for HD equipped PS2's.

    5. UMD movies cost too much. I'm willing to buy them, but not at the current prices.

    6. I"m not complaining about the lack of games because I'm old and don't have lots of time. I also own the Diablo-like Untold Legends which keeps me happy hacking and slashing. But...if I was one of those teenagers or college kids with lots of summer free time I'd have burned right through my games and would be wanting more. Right now there are only two other games in the PSP's in store lineups that I'd like to own, those being Lumines and the Hot Shots Golf game. But as stated above the 39.95 price is somewhat discouraging.

    7. Downloadable games. Even if Sony wants to discourage emulation of a competitors older hardware, they could approach the people who port things like Nethack http://virtuamunstaz.de/nh/ or that VNC client and say hey, we'll "sign" your binaries so they'll run on any PSP and host them on our site

    There are some encouraging signs though, they've got that new portal that you can get to from a preset bookmark in the 2.0 browser. http://psp.us.playstation.com/ (go to psp.connect.com/ with a PSP too)

    Personally I think judging the PSP a "failure" is a bit premature.

  88. Hotspots in public places by tepples · · Score: 1

    Now they're selling shoddy games that have full web browsers included. Tell me that is not a gimmick. We are gamers, not friggin PDA users.

    Thing is that a lot of hotspots in public places require authentication using a web page before they'll route your machine's packets. That's why you need either a web browser on all your games or a network of hotspots that don't use web authentication. The Wipeout developers chose the former route; Nintendo is going the latter.

    1. Re:Hotspots in public places by agraupe · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, the DS's wireless functionality is intended mainly for DS-to-DS communication, not for connecting to the internet. Although some may see this as cutting off people from potential competitors, it also means that competitors won't be anonymous, and therefore aren't as likely to be assholes (and if they are, you can deal with it in person).

    2. Re:Hotspots in public places by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      >>f I'm not mistaken, the DS's wireless functionality is intended mainly for DS-to-DS communication, not for connecting to the internet.

      That's the way it is now, though in the future, it will be through to internet as well.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    3. Re:Hotspots in public places by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      The DS has wireless functionality dubbed "Ni-Fi"--basicallly layer-2 (datalink) 802.11b. The firmware would need an upgrade to support TCP/IP (layer 4/3). So this functionality is not *completely* Wi-Fi, but it is easy enough to modify. Nintendo has been marketing this capability to use Wi-Fi on the DS as of late. Intelligent decision on their part, but causes one to wonder why they didn't simply include a network suite in the original flash of the firmware...

  89. Touch screen is important by tepples · · Score: 1

    DS? Nintendogs... Mario 64... and other ports of recent games

    Meteos. Kirby Canvas Curse. Yoshi Touch and Go. Could those have been done well on the PSP? And guess what: almost all the announced handheld ports of PC RTS games are coming to the DS because the DS touch screen emulates a mouse better than the PSP analog nub.

    that look horribly N64ish

    Do looks count more than battery life and price? If so, then the Game Gear would have beaten the Game Boy in the market. And in a typical portable use case, you don't have time to wait for 60 seconds of NOW LOADING *cough* Midnight Club *cough* NFSU *cough*.

    1. Re:Touch screen is important by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that for the games I like to play (RPGs), I found three for the PSP (Untold Legends, which is a really unimpressive Diablo clone) Untold Legends 2 (w00t! More diablo clone-ness), and Another one whose name escapes me. I applaud the graphics, but I despise the load times.

      For the DS, I've got Lunar (Sept. 20), Advance Wars (technically strategy I guess), and among other things (coming next February) Age of Empires. Playing my 2nd favorite RTS on a portable is going to be grand. :) (Shame no one makes a Total Annihilation game for portables. I'd love one of those...)

      Playing Untold Legends on a friend's PSP, well, I didn't play it so much as watch it load... and load... and load... Fun. :)

      But seriously, I can see that Sony is trying really hard not to compete in the GBA space with Nintendo, because everyone that has done that has come up short... but to claim the DS is a gimmick, or the touch screen is a gimmick is just a bit silly to me.

      I claim a $125 memory stick so I can load a 300mb DiVX movie on it is a gimmick... ;)

      I'd rather be playing Lunar. :-) And while I'm waiting for PSP titles, I can, well, watch movies on it. But on the DS, I can play my GBA games and not feel like I've wasted my money (the backlight on the DS is much better than the GBA SP, and the colors are brighter... So games look very good. I have my old GBA for the 3 or 4 GB Color games I still play... Tetris DX, Space Invaders, and Heroes of Might and Magic.)

      But, not to sound like a fanboy: YMMV.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  90. touch screen a gimmick by akhomerun · · Score: 1

    well i guess then the mice on PCs are also gimmicks, since they essentially do the same things.

    this is what you get with the PSP for $250
    - a game player that has a lackluster library of ports
    - a picture viewer that holds 15 pictures
    - a music player that holds 6 songs (unless you already have 15 pictures)
    - a betamax 2.0 (UMD) player
    - living with the fact that you're essentially playing a gameboy, excetpt that gameboys are $79 and play a huge library of 500+ games plus the 500+ classic GB games

  91. How Sony could have made the PSP popular by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The answer was easy - UMD? Forget it. Use a miniature version of DVD's, and sell blanks in six-packs - then provide software to le you transcode movies onto these discs for taking the portable.

    This would have given people a reason to buy the system in the dry spell before good games came out... as it stands now I don't know if the dry spell will end soon enough for Sony.

    On the other hand I think they are banking on PSP integration with the PS3 so they are probably too comitted at this point to back away from the system.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  92. Most of you guys haven't been in Tokyo uh? by gproux · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen even ONE Gameboy DS in the subway for many months i have been there. On the other hand, I can see at least a couple of people carrying around their PSP to watch movies or play around with one of the fine games on the PSP. Ok maybe not as many people as those owning an iPod mini. The target market of Sony are not the kids, this is the market with dispoable income able to watch not-DVD-quality video on UMD at a price that is just too high to be true... And they manage well as they are keeping on par with the DS which is much cheaper. If the DS was so good... at that price it should outsell the PSP by at least a factor of 2 seeing the price...

    1. Re:Most of you guys haven't been in Tokyo uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree completely. I know I haven't seen anyone with a DS *anywhere* in Tokyo. But I see people with PSP's every second or third time I go out.

      I've even got one myself

    2. Re:Most of you guys haven't been in Tokyo uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should look for Nintendo DS, there is no Gameboy DS.

    3. Re:Most of you guys haven't been in Tokyo uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you're basing your conclusion because of this...?!

      Boy, you are really stupid... just like your PSP

    4. Re:Most of you guys haven't been in Tokyo uh? by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      But especially in Japan, the Nintendo DS is pretty much killing the PSP. The DS is outselling the PSP by a factor of 2 or more since a while.

      Japanese hardware sales for August 8 - August 14:

      System - Weekly sales
      1. NDS - 103,095
      2. PS2 - 37,041
      3. PSP - 25,100
      4. GBASP - 19,958
      5. NGC - 3,799
      6. GBA - 708
      7. XBX - 202

      And software sales wise it is even worse, there is rarely a PSP software title in the top10, but almost always a bunch of DS titles.

      --
      Jan
  93. Re:Zonk... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude played Nintendo at his bachelor party. (follow the trail of links from his profile.)

    What. The. Fuck!

  94. Re:Zonk... by cornface · · Score: 1

    As a DS owner, as well as a human being, I have to say that your "buyer's guide" is an annoyingly biased and pointless piece of poop.

    Sorry.

    Whore that link, though! Whore it!

  95. Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by freeweed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People don't always buy the superior product

    No kidding.

    Sony's managed to out-hype and out-market 2 of its game platform competitors now, with a somewhat (or majorly) inferior product.

    Depending on how you look at it, the PS1 demolished both the N64 and Dreamcast - and really, it wasn't superior to either. Whether it was load times or sheer graphic capabilities, the PS1 was a pretty dreadful platform except for the fact that everyone had one, and it had thousands of mediocre games released.

    The PS2 was the final nail in the Dreamcast coffin, and at the time most DC games looked and played far better than PS2 fare. The PS2 is still leading the Xbox and Gamecube in sales.

    Maybe Sony's just finally getting a taste of their own medicine.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it had thousands of mediocre games released.

      To be fair, Castlevania: SOTN alone was worthy of forgiving at least 25% of the rest of the PSX's entire lineup.

    2. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by ninjakoala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is true that the Playstation had thousands of mediocre or even bad games, but since it had such a huge library there were also lots of really great games. I love my (quite exclusive) Playstation game collection dearly, but I also treasure the Dreamcast far more than any console released before or after it. I can't help but hate the PS2 a little for being the object of hype that killed the Dreamcast. Oh, and SEGA for completely failing to market their little killer machine properly and then orphaning it. Oh yeah, and for not releasing SEGA Gaga in Europa so I could have a go at managing the company better than they did ^_^

      --
      Against the grain
    3. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhh... Castlevania: SOTN... that was like a drug to me.

    4. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      What made playstation kill the N64 was the fact that it had a CD-Rom Drive and developers wanted cd sound and movies, which N64 could not do. As far as Sega was concerned, I think the controller was just a little ahead of it's time.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by shadow0_0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the reason is that PlayStation always have more games available than N64/GCN. I love my GCN but there are games that make me get a PS2 (katamari damacy, FF series, GT series, Resident Evil, God of War etc).

    6. Re:Sony getting a taste of its own medicine by mink · · Score: 1

      I'm finding I like my Gamecube RE titles beter then the PS2 versions. Then again, I have always hated the god damn interface no matter what platform it was on.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  96. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by Doomstalk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe the reference was to the weird little GameBoy Micro they just released; and I'm inclined to agree with the Sony guy actually, it is a gimmick.

    I disagree. I think it's a well-placed shot at the low-end and cell phone game playing crowd. It's cheap, it's small, it looks pretty slick, and it's got a HUGE library of games. Let's face it: for most people the PSP and the DS are big and expensive. And if you just want something to fill that 10 minute gap before the subway comes, neither system's games don't have enough pick up and play value. The GBA fits the bill perfectly.

  97. Beat it with a stick! by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    The 3 prong controller is impossible to access all buttons readily. The trigger can be touched with your right index finger, but then you can no longer reach the 4 keypad with anything but unreliable fingers (if that). The N64 had a few good games and that's what made it successful as a console, basically everything else says it was junk (no cd's etc..)

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  98. not arrogant by etzel · · Score: 1

    The technology/quality of the DS is way behind of the PSP. Just hold one in each hand.

    --
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."
  99. Editorial Integrity by DoctaWatson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Zonk posts an article that he disagrees with so that he can give his rebuttal opinion by listing a handful of previous dissenting stores that were posted by... Zonk.

    Well great. We know where Zonk stands. Now why can't we mod him down for redundancy?

  100. I WANT MY GAMES! WAHHH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of seeing these kind of complaints. Already saw a couple in this thread about the PSP. It hasn't been a year yet and people are moaning that the system they bought on launch doesn't have a big selection of games. Do you expect developers to pull games out of some magic honeypot? Give it some time before things get into full swing. If I were to guess the success of the playstation 1 & 2 based only on the games that came out in their first years, I would've assumed them to be colossal failures too.

  101. Re:Ahhhh - the ostrich marketing ploy strikes agai by gameboyhippo · · Score: 1

    Dang! Why can't I have mod points when I see a funny comment like this. I always get them on dull days.

  102. Many DS users in London, England... by Wonderkid · · Score: 1

    Sony are in denial here, a little like their still tepid response to the iPod. I see young people from 6 to 30 playing with their DS's everywhere, on the bus, the tube, even at work. It is more innovative and physically practical than the DS. The games have that addictive nature that Nintendo know so well. Although Nintendo come last in the console wars, they do actually understand human centric design better than Sony. The Gamecube controller is an example. The PSP is too large and flawed to ever reach mass market. No touch screen, no mass storage, so what's the point of the big screen? DS is a far more complete product. (Don't get me wrong, the screen on the PSP is excellent, but if people are not using a DS, they will use their phones for play games. The large screen is really only suited to viewing photos, but with no hard drive, what the point?

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  103. As a European who won't be buying one... by zmower · · Score: 1
    I think the OP has hit it on the head. This is a shallow marketing ploy to get PSP in the news before it's European launch. Oh look, Slashdot fell for it.

    I for one won't be buying one because of the UMD disks, the fact that they'll come with version 2 firmware installed and my recently acquired hostile attitude to all things Sony due to the Fiona Apple affair. Heh, I may just buy a DS on 1st Sptember so I can abuse anyone buying a PSP.

    --

    Sig pending!
  104. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by ninjakoala · · Score: 1

    How do you figure that? You can run any GBA-title on the DS. Besides that I think most the the DS games I have fit that game perfectly. Feel the Magic XX/XY (aka Project Rub), Yoshi Touch & Go, Meteos, Another Code: Two Memories. Besides that if I have 5 minutes or more I can always grab a quick race in Ridge Racer DS or Need for Speed Underground 2. If you don't manage to finish a game you just close the DS and it goes into sleep mode and lets you continue when you open it again. I'd say it's damn close to perfect in that regard. I just wish the homebrew stuff was easier to use on the road (at the moment I can only have one title on my MovieAdvance at a time even though I have a big CF card in it).

    --
    Against the grain
  105. DS?... Gimmicky compared to the PSP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pot. meet kettle.

    Seriously, the DS is announced, suddenly sony goes "HAY GUYZ! LOOK! WE MADE A HANDHELD TOO! ....AND LOOK! IT CAN PLAY SMALL DVD'S AND MP3'S!"

    Yeah, the PSP is totally non gimmicky.

  106. But that was exactly Nintendos intention! by LKM · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The 3 prong controller is impossible to access all buttons readily.

    That was exactly Nintendos intention. You can have hold it analog-button (for, say, Jump-N-Runs), digital-button (for example for puzzlers) or analog-digital (such as for FPS). That way, developers are forced not to use too many buttons. You may like this or not, but for most non-hardcore gamers, it's a great idea.

  107. I pity you by LKM · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I feel pretty bad for you. Will will never experience the sheer joy of playing Mario Kart against your best buddies, hollering insults at each other as you just barely overtake them before the finishing line. You will never play Bomberman DS against your pals, yelling "boom" into their consoles so as to make them get killed by their own bombs. You will never find out how awesome a game Kirby: Canvas Curse really is, and you won't spend hours and hours painting cute little clouds on which Yoshi can walk, trying to beat your girlfriend's record.

    For this, you are a poorer person, and I pity you.

    However, this is not Nintendo's problem. Nintendo is successfull precisely because they don't follow every fad. They never made Mario: Zombie killer - well, if you ignore Luigi's Mansion :-) - or Grand Theft Yoshi. They always made well-done games with a focus on gameplay. They always made games which can be enjoyed by all ages. And it worked out quite well for them.

    If you require blood in order to enjoy a game, by all means, get a PSP. Or wait until Resident Evil DS is released :-)

    1. Re:I pity you by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      If you require blood in order to enjoy a game, by all means, get a PSP. Or wait until Resident Evil DS is released

      Or grow the fuck up. This guy sounds like someone who listens to Slipknot, wears black make-up, and bitches about how "nobody understands me", playing violent games as an outlet for his frustrating inability to function as an intelligent human being.

      Feel free to mod this flamebait, by the way.

      --
      This poo is cold.
  108. 2D rules by LKM · · Score: 1
    It doesn't have 3D acceleration.

    I'd consider that a pro, not a con. Maybe that's where 2D games will continue to live once the GBA dies.

  109. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the reference was to the weird little GameBoy Micro they just released; and I'm inclined to agree with the Sony guy actually, it is a gimmick.

    No, if you RTFA, you'll see that he was specifically talking about the touch screen on the DS.

    As for the GBA Micro, it is not a gimmick, but it is nothing special--merely another edition of the GBA that offers a more convenient size--small enough for people to carry around routinely, like they do a cell phone. As such, it will compete with the cell phone gaming market, which Nintendo may see as more significant competition for the GBA than the Sony PSP. The Micro also differentiates the GBA from the DS, and demonstrates to developers Nintendo's continuing support of the GBA platform.

  110. A European View by andersh · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more - I bought my PSP (JP) from Hong Kong several months ago with several titles. Wipeout, was one of them of course. The only reason I bought it was for the Wifi, I foresaw the homebrew scene would create enough software for me to use it as a handheld. While I have several laptops they're often too large to drag around. And I don't really use my Palm any longer since I purchased the SonyEricsson P900. Nice as the P900 is - it lacks Wifi. Even with the free GPRS my subscription provides - I would still like the ability to browse the web on the WLANs around my University. For the time being I have no use for the PSP - it's quitely gathering dust. I'm not upgrading to the 2.0 firmware - that's for sure.

  111. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
    The PSP's relatively expensive, the DS is $130 (down from an almightly wallet-busting $150...) It's not that much pricier than the GameBoy is, and I wouldn't be surprised if the GB's been more expensive.

    I think, actually, this is 90% of the reason why Nintendo is wiping the floor with Sony on this score is that they've realised that the majority of their customers want something small, and cheap, that lets them play games. Sony's produced a relatively large device that's costlier that's attempting to do a whole bunch of things that, really, it shouldn't be trying to do. Sony talks about the DS having gimmicks? It just hasn't realised that UMD drives are going to see far less use than the DS's touchscreen (the latter of which, to me, is a good idea.)

    I'd be surprised if anything resembling the PSP is still selling in a year, at least at the current price. If Sony finds a way of selling the unit for $100, then they might stand a chance. More likely, I can see Sony incorporating something else that, essentially, makes it a different product.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  112. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by agraupe · · Score: 1
    It was the price that made a difference for me. For the same amount as a PSP, I could buy a DS with games and any accessories that I wanted. Add to that superior battery life and an innovative method of control.

    Also, the movie thing is nothing but a gimmick. I used to play movies on my PDA, but it was more of a novelty than anything. After the first few, I never did it again, because there's just no point in watching a movie on a small screen.

  113. Pot! Kettle! Black! Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The DS is gimmicky? Huh. That's awful big talk coming from a company whose portable game console has been advertised a lot more (both by the media and Slashdot) for its MP3 capabilities, wireless internet, web browser, movie abilities, and all sorts of other... er... gimmicks.

  114. You Gotta Have a Gimmick by gxw · · Score: 1

    -- From the Musical 'Gypsy' (about the life of famous stripper, Gypsy Rose Lee)

    Yes, Sony, the DS screen is a gimmick. Yes, that is part of what sets it apart from previous handhelds and the PSP. Yes, that gimmick is part of what we like about it.

    Took away one analog controller and didn't replace it with a touch screen? Shame on you Sony. Shame on you for failing to innovate. Shame on you for failing to come up with a compelling gimmick yourself.

    When the most exciting thing about your game platform is that people can run a web browser on it (or run home-brew apps instead), you have failed. Better luck next time. Lets hope the gimmicks of the PS3 live up to our expectations...

    "Get yourself a gimmick and you can be a star too."

  115. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

    To the designer of SUVs, what happens is the economy car market is, to a large extent, irrelevant.

    I think the comment about relevancy was more to point out the difference in the markets than to say the DS isn't an important consumer product. Clearly the DS is being bought, but the PSP isn't going after the same sort of person who's interested in Nintendogs. It's going for the Grand Theft Auto crowd.

    When the PS1 hit the market it basically ignored NES, SNES buyers and went to a demograhic that was quite a bit older. All of their initial advertising reflected this (remember the dominatrix chick?). They basically built that market and it turned out that 15-30 market was quite lucritive.

    Now they're attempting the same thing with the PSP. They don't have half naked chicks trying to sell it, but they do have a game lineup that's decidedly _not_ cute. Even the UMD movies are largely PG-13 and above. They're building this portable gaming and media market from scratch and despite sales numbers less than the DS, I think they're largely succeeding.

    Clearly under these circumstances, the DS is quite "irrelevant."

    TW

  116. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

    that line should have been: "They're building this adult portable gaming and media market from scratch and despite sales numbers less than the DS, I think they're largely succeeding.

    And one more observation. I've never seen anyone under 15 with a PSP, but I was at the doctor's office the other day and both me and another 30-something were playing away on our PSPs. The adult portable gamer is real, it just remains to be seen how many of us there are.

    TW

  117. Re:Zonk didn't actually link to 1up.com's commenta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your UID is over 800000, stop shouting, go outside and learn how to ride a skateboard...troll

  118. Wrong move for Sony by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    If Sony says that the DS isn't really its competition, then that leaves only the Game Boy for it to compete against. And they're doing far worse against the Game Boy than they are against the DS.

    Sony saying this pretty much means that Sony is failing more miserably than previously thought. They had a handicap in their favor by going against a new, experimental product rather than the only entrenched name brand in the industry.

  119. Re:Zonk... by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Congratulations, you have won the award for worst Slashdot grammar of the week! I truly have no idea what you are trying to say with these tortured sentences.

    Bonus point for using both "gamers" and "gamer's" in the same sentence, ensuring that at least ONE of them will be wrong!

  120. -1, Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  121. Otakon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At Otakon 2005 last weekend, there were at least 15 Nintendo DS units for every 1 PSP. And PictoChat rocked the house. Absolutely true.

  122. DS trend by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

    Here is how it went in Japan. Nintendo and Sony both sold about all the units they released in 2004 (DS: 1.5 mil, PSP: 0.5 mil). In January, the DS was ahead for the first couple weeks, then Sony pulled ahead on the weekly numbers. All the early adopters were able to get thier hands on a DS, but the PSP had suffered from low production, so it wasn't a surprise that the DS sales dipped more quickly.

    By Feb, the weekly sales settled into a routiene. The PSP would sell ~30-40K and the the DS would sell ~15-25K depending on releases.

    Catch! Touch! Yoshi!, Touch! Kirby, and Another Code were released in this time for the DS without significantly increasing sales.

    Then Nintendogs hit shelves in April. Since its release the DS has not dipped below the PSP once in weekly sales.

    After the Nintendogs spike, the DS sold ~30K/week and the PSP ~20K. Brain Training for Adults spiked DS sales when it was released and increased weekly DS sales afterward to ~35-40K. The sales spike you see in the past 2 weeks is due to the release of Jump Superstars.

    The PSP has maintained its 20K/week level through all this.

    1. Re:DS trend by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      are you telling me that.....GAMES are what is causing the DS to sell? ....how ....weird....

      Thanks for the info,absolutely fascinating.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  123. No disc by phorm · · Score: 1

    Most video playback devices use discs or some other moving media. Spinning a CD or reel actually adds quite a lot to power consumption. I'm not sure how much power is required for reading flash-based memory, but it's supposed to be a lot less.

  124. "Entry" into the handheld market? by Dark_Link2135 · · Score: 1

    Ok...correct me if I'm wrong, but wtf is up with them saying Nintendo's entry into the handheld market? I mean for the longest time, the game boy series was basically the ONLY handheld to have...I mean yeah sure, Nintendo's fallen behind all the others, but this guy sounds like hes saying Nintendo has ALWAYS been behind.

    --
    "Potpourii doesn't taste as good as it smells." - Dark_Link2135
  125. Re:ROFL! Is this a joke? by mink · · Score: 1

    A majority of people I saw playing gameboys back in the late 80's early 90's were adults. The adult portable gamer as you call them has existed for well over a decade in large numbers and continues to play what they enjoy, be it GBA, DS, Game Gear, PSP, or Turbo Express.

    Did you think no adults played portable games until NGauge?

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.