Slashdot Mirror


Deadly Version of Bird Flu Found in Romania

CMan0 writes "The BBC reports that a deadly version of the bird flu has been found in Romania. Several ducks and chickens have died on a farm in Romania this month of the disease, it has been confirmed. It's mentioned that the disease is spreading very rapidly, as the last known location of the disease was Siberia, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan in August and the 1st of October in Turkey." From the article: "People appear dazed by what is happening, but since it was confirmed that this is the strain of the bird flu virus found in Asia, they have begun co-operating closely with officials sent to collect their birds, our correspondent says. Turkey has already reported the discovery of the lethal strain of the virus among birds in the west of the country. The EU has banned imports of live birds and poultry products from Romania and Turkey. EU veterinary experts said on Friday that the bird flu outbreak did not represent a risk to the general public 'at present'."

378 comments

  1. Not yet at least by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may not be a risk to the general public yet... But it's still quite scary for those of us with rather weak immune systems.

    1. Re:Not yet at least by mhearne · · Score: 1

      The first outbreak was around New Year of this year. Please see:

      http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid /29315/newsDate/2-Feb-2005/story.htm

      This isn't new. But for them to have dug up bodies from the 1918 outbreak is unprecedented. I think that it might be a bad idea to resurrect these old vermin.

      That is, publishing the genomic structures of these extinct creatures may provide a blueprint for murder.

      Michael

  2. Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First famine.
    Then Tsunami.
    Then Flood and earthquake.
    Now a plauge.

    Which part of the bible is this again?

    1. Re:Uh oh.. by ZippyKitty · · Score: 1

      Don't forget War. I think that is in there somewhere.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow Fruit flies like a banana
    2. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooo! and Romans. There's Romans in the Bible. They're a bit like Romanians, aren't they? And Jews, and Arabs. It's all there, look it up! Believe, and you'll be saved from ever having to figure things out for yourself.

    3. Re:Uh oh.. by marsperson · · Score: 2, Funny

      You left out the internet falling apart and the killer poison dart-wielding dolphins.

    4. Re:Uh oh.. by unknown51a · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the wars, which aren't technically wars.

      --
      I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
    5. Re:Uh oh.. by Alomex · · Score: 1

      It's the apocalypse! You might as well give me all your money and seek salvation fast. Please forward your funds to: Bank of Nigeria, account # 419-666-419-666.

    6. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that whole "figuring things out part" is the whole point fo the bible in the first place. Maybe people should cut out that whole "church" thing and actually READ the book themselves before defending or attacking it.

    7. Re:Uh oh.. by Vihai · · Score: 1

      ...and God! ...but...where is God?

    8. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      People who believe in the bible don't have to worry at all about the virus, because they don't believe one creature can change into another, so it's not possible for the virus to 'mutate' and jump to humans.

    9. Re:Uh oh.. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      End of the world , The single most predicted thing ever .
      The Rapture has been predicted on several thousand dates over the last 1600 years or so (Perhaps a little longer)
      Around each of those times , about all of these things have occurred .The List of Anti-Christs is rather impressive also .

      Bird Flu has not yet Mutated in this way .
      Here's another few thing that the Media could run with .
      There is a chance (however miniscule ) that HIV could mutate into an airborne virus .
      There is a chance that the common flu could mutate into a form where it could potentially become near fatal in 90% of cases.
      Malaria could mutate and start killing us all off .
      An Asteroid could hit the planet and wipe us out.
      An accident could occur and set off a few nuclear war heads and start a Nuclear Holocaust .
      The Apes could evolve and enslave humanity .
      Tom Cruise could make another movie .

      Start buying up your tinned food now , move underground and isolate yourself .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    10. Re:Uh oh.. by wealthychef · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Which part of the bible is this again?

      Uh, the part where God kills all the chickens?

      Why is this put so apocalyptically? Wake me up when it starts spreading among humans. AFAIK, the real problem is that when the next pandemic hits, we don't have a way to manufacture immunizations.

      I tell you what, how about we start investing more money in science and research, and less in crazy religions?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    11. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break. Throw the bible in the trash and move on.

    12. Re:Uh oh.. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      There is nothing biblical about this. Scientists have been waiting for something like this or much worse since the Spanish flu in 1910's. This is simple science facts. Cannot believe that supersticious retards are among slashdot users, and even worse they post stupid comments like that

    13. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I've read the Bible. And about it. Not that it's an obsession. It's not the only source of wisdom, you know. Anyway, if it floats you boat, good for you. Thanks for the free advice. Here's some in return: just don't be so sure you understand it as well as you think you do.

    14. Re:Uh oh.. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, Biblical "end times" are supposed to be rife with anarchy, disease, famine, and natural disasters. Looks like we -might- be on the pinacle of such events, if indeed things start getting worse.

      On the other hand, there's a group of people that thinks the book of Revelations in the Bible is merely a very insightful template for the eb and flow of government: a very dramatic example of how a typical government falls appart and a new one comes into its place, including the political/social impressions of the events as well.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    15. Re:Uh oh.. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, the real problem is that when the next pandemic hits, we don't have a way to manufacture immunizations.

      Close. The real problem is that governments have been conned into believing the only answer to a pandemic is Tamiflu. Tamiflu is a patent-protected antiviral agent which can only be made by Roche. It is not a vaccine, since it alleviates the symptoms of bird flu, but does not stop it spreading.

      Crazy religions will be just as effective for everyone who can't afford Tamiflu (about US$90.00 per course), and they're a lot more fun.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    16. Re:Uh oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last part...

    17. Re:Uh oh.. by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Don't forget wars, and rumours of wars. Which are on a downturn despite opinion otherwise. Yeah, The arabs and the jews are killing each other in the middle east, but that hasn't been news for 4000 years or so. ~90 years ago on the other hand, there were some wars going on. Europe in flame, africa in flame, East Asia in flame.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  3. The locals aren't helping by confusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having the farmers hiding their birds from the government isn't helping. They're trying to protect their property, but in the end they'll end up causing many more to die.

    Also, with migratory ducks and swallows (of the laden variety), we're going to see this all over europe in the coming weeks.

    Jerry
    http://www.cyvin.org/

    1. Re:The locals aren't helping by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should have invested in a missile defense system like we did here in the US. I imagine the missle defense will be useful to keep the migratory birds out of the continental US.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:The locals aren't helping by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Also, with migratory ducks and swallows (of the laden variety), we're going to see this all over europe in the coming weeks.

      Which raises the question: why is EU stopping poultry meat imports from affected countries? The poultry farms that do exports (as opposed to the local farmers who raise for their own use) usually raise the birds in enclosed facilities, so the contact with wildlife is null.

      Is is a move to please nevrotic EU population? Is is a distrust message for the capability of the affected countries to deal with this outbreak? (Incidentally, the countries in that area -- Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey -- aren't EU members).

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:The locals aren't helping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, with migratory ducks and swallows (of the laden variety), we're going to see this all over europe in the coming weeks.

      You mean European or African swallows?

      *ducks*

    4. Re:The locals aren't helping by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Somehow, there is humor in having a tv. character that was known for his Reagan support who started all this as a ruse, is now poking fun at Bush's work on the same.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    5. Re:The locals aren't helping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just a fair distrust of their capabilities of handling stuff.

      The people living in those countries may be nice, but the countries are poor and do have some disadvantages when dealing with serious stuff, such as corruption, the need to look after yourself in every situation (ie. can't let the gov't take my birds, they won't pay me, unlike in wealthier countries), uneducated populace etc.

      I'm not being racist/nationalistic/whatever, just realistic.

      /me from eu

    6. Re:The locals aren't helping by afd8856 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a Romanian, I can tell you that the government here took action imediately. I can't say the same thing about the Republic of Moldova, where I heard they had a few villages where chicken were dying by the hundreds, in a single day, and the officials did just about nothing.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    7. Re:The locals aren't helping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP! Troll? That was funny!
      Or is intelligent humour no longer apprciated on Slashdot?

    8. Re:The locals aren't helping by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      (Incidentally, the countries in that area -- Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey -- aren't EU members).

      Bingo. I'm pretty sure you just answered your own question. The Western Euros (at least the powers that be) don't like the Easternes, and especially can't stand the Turks.
      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    9. Re:The locals aren't helping by jayminer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Turkish government has acted with agility. All (known) chicken and other wingy animals infected with this virus are quarantined and killed (Not a nice thing but good for us), also hunting sessions are cancelled a day before it hit the news.

      Also the government has guaranteed that they will (in fact, people paying taxes) take the burden of any losses of farmers.

      But when it comes to the migration of birds, in God we trust.

      Even though negotiations with EU and Turkey has started, Turkey is not a EU-country and EU does not import wingy thingies from Turkey anyhow.

    10. Re:The locals aren't helping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turkish government is paying for every killed chicken, too.

    11. Re:The locals aren't helping by hvatum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, with migratory ducks and swallows (of the laden variety), we're going to see this all over europe in the coming weeks.

      This raises the question: African or European Swallows?

      --
      Netbooks, they come with Linux or a $3 copy of Windows. Either way, Microsoft loses.
    12. Re:The locals aren't helping by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Salut,
      I am from Moldova and I will tell you that in Moldova they would have just hushed it up until it would have spread to humans. They wouldn't even have been able to detect it probably. Some farmers might distrust the goverment in Romania, in Moldova all of them do. They will hide the chickens and I would not be surprised if the Republic of Moldova will become the source of the flu pandemic in Europe. The funny thing is though, the Moldovans are so jacked up on wine and vodka (rachiu), they probably won't get sick and won't even notice the flu ;)

    13. Re:The locals aren't helping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am from the Ukraine, and I will tell you the infected chickens have killed the government and taken over completely. The farmers cower in fear, drowning their sorrows with vwrzsqqzx (Ukrainian ether) and qxzytwzy (Ukranian crack cocaine). As we speak, the chickens are massing like war planes on huge fields, ready to rain their infected droppings on countries to the West.

    14. Re:The locals aren't helping by gaspyy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Having the farmers hiding their birds from the government isn't helping


      Where did you get that information from? I am from Romania, and as far as I know the farmers haven't tried to do such a thing as they are being paid in full at the current market rate. So far 17,000 birds have been killed and two or three villages are now in quarantine - food is delivered in trucks, all cars and persons are disinfected, etc.
  4. And now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush will push the civil use of the military in the USA, even though we have national guards for that. Worse, Congress will vote it in and not think twice about the implications. America Land of the free, you will be missed.

    1. Re:And now by confusion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      1) Bush is quickly becoming so unpopular that congress people in his own party will disagree with him just to be able to get re-elected in the coming years, so I'm not going to buy that it'll be Bush's idea if it does happen.
      2) I'm guessing the states would be challenging anything like this quite hard, because as you say, that's what the national guard is for.
      3) This is quite off-topic.

  5. Delta of Danube by swatthatfly · · Score: 5, Informative

    It should be noted that the dead birds are from an area next to the Danube's Delta, which is the biggest delta of Europe, and where millions of wild birds from many species live or pass through on their migration route. It is therefore little surprise that such a busy nexus was touched by the virus. As far as I know, this particular virus was not thought to be dangerous to humans as such, but the possibility if it combining with the human version was the concern.

    --
    keyboard not found! press any key to continue...
    1. Re:Delta of Danube by alphan · · Score: 1
      As far as I know, this particular virus was not thought to be dangerous to humans as such, but the possibility if it combining with the human version was the concern.

      It is deadly for humans too, but not contagious.

    2. Re:Delta of Danube by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

      The threat of it becoming airborne is also a pretty big fear from what I've read, with good reason. If something such as AIDs became airborne, it would probably be a pretty safe assumption the human race would almost die, unless the drug companies to have vaccines and such for it hidden, which is another topic alltogether.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    3. Re:Delta of Danube by JJP · · Score: 4, Informative

      The virus is dangerous to humans! It is the same H5N1 string of flu virus that has infected humans in South East Asia, claiming 60 lives. For now the virus can not spread from human to human. It could pose a serious threat if this virus infects someone who is also infected with a 'normal' flu virus. Exchange of genetic material between the human flu virus and the bird flu virus could form a new pathogenic flu virus and cause a pandemic. More info on the WHO web site: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2005_10_13/en/index.htm l.

    4. Re:Delta of Danube by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If something such as AIDs became airborne, it would probably be a pretty safe assumption the human race would almost die."

      Depends what you mean about "almost". About 15% of Caucasians are immune to AIDS, thanks to a gene that can be traced back to the Black Plague. I remember hearing about the discovery in China of a single Chinese individual with the gene as well; but apart from that, AIDS immunity is unknown in non-Caucasians.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    5. Re:Delta of Danube by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      unless the drug companies to have vaccines and such for it hidden

      I think they have them right behind the place where they hide the pills that turn water into gasoline.

    6. Re:Delta of Danube by jim_v2000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What the hell?

      Exchange of genetic material between the human flu virus and the bird flu virus could form a new pathogenic flu virus and cause a pandemic.

      Maybe I'm ignorant, but since when do viruses (virii) exchange genetic material? Please cite some kind of real world example of this actually happening...I'm really curious. Otherwise, stop the hype.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    7. Re:Delta of Danube by Trailwalker · · Score: 1
      Exchange of genetic material between the human flu virus and the bird flu virus could form a new pathogenic flu virus and cause a pandemic.
      A random combination of genetic material could do almost anything: Curing cancer, keeping children from a horrid fate, enlarging bodily appendages,etc.

      Assuming the worst is good jounalism. Assuming the best is good politics.
    8. Re:Delta of Danube by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Virus A infects your cells by injecting its dna into your cell and turning it into a factory producing more virus A parts.

      Virus B infects your cells by injecting its dna into your cell and turning it into a factory producing more virus B parts.

      If B infects a cell already infected by A, then it becomes a factory producing virus A parts, virus B parts, and possibly a virus AB or two.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    9. Re:Delta of Danube by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      But does this ever happen?

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    10. Re:Delta of Danube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    11. Re:Delta of Danube by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Yes. Google for "Reassortment Virus". Also try "Influenza A".

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    12. Re:Delta of Danube by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Care to provide some sources for your claims? Especially: 1. 15% of caucasians are immune 2. the immunity has got something to do with the plague

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    13. Re:Delta of Danube by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      It is the same H5N1 string of flu virus that has infected humans in South East Asia

      Am I the only one who first tries to interpret 'H5N1' like 'l55t' or the other retarded misspellings people chat/post with?

    14. Re:Delta of Danube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cannot believe the hype surrounding this.

      the virus has claimed just 60 lives in the far east - one of the most
      crowded and populated areas of the world - and where many millions live
      in the same houses as the pigs and the birds.

      so, why do we suddenly have the fear that this will kill millions - when
      it hasnt done so in its originating site?

      more than 60 people die each DAY on the road of Europe. Are we seeing cars
      being culled? are we seeing such hype over strips of tarmac? no. we just
      go on burning fossil fuels and killing innocent people. but fear that virus
      folks! 'cos we can SEE it and we didnt invent it!

      hey! just for fun, lets FLY THE VIRUS INTO AN INFECTED area. yes, lets get the contaminated material and ship it to Surrey, UK - so that it has an even higher chance of infecting more people!

    15. Re:Delta of Danube by theCoder · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to figure out how they got 5 hydrogens to bond to 1 nitrogen :)

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    16. Re:Delta of Danube by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Can we stop using AIDS and HIV interchangeably? (Yeah, I'm linking to Wikipedia, shoot me.)

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    17. Re:Delta of Danube by david.given · · Score: 2, Informative
      What's more, sometimes a virus will fail to work properly. It'll inject its genetic material into the cell, but won't turn the cell into a virus-producing engine.

      The cell will then quite happily duplicate the virus' DNA when it next divides. If the cell happens to be a somatic cell, generating sperm or egg cells, then the virus' DNA can be replicated among all the cells in the creature's offspring! There are parts of the human gene sequence that have been positively identified as originating from viruses. Yes, Virginia, your great-great-great-great-great-great-grandad was an Influenza Z virus.

      Combine this with another viral failure mode, where bits of host DNA get caught up in the viruses the slave cell is producing, and you have a perfectly viable mechanism for allowing bits of DNA from one species being introduced into the gene pool of an entirely different, normally incompatible species. This has actually happened.

      Genetics isn't nearly as cut and dried as you might think...

    18. Re:Delta of Danube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i cannot believe the hype surrounding this.

      the virus has claimed just 60 lives in the far east - one of the most
      crowded and populated areas of the world - and where many millions live
      in the same houses as the pigs and the birds.

      so, why do we suddenly have the fear that this will kill millions - when
      it hasnt done so in its originating site?

      more than 60 people die each DAY on the road of Europe. Are we seeing cars
      being culled? are we seeing such hype over strips of tarmac? no. we just
      go on burning fossil fuels and killing innocent people. but fear that virus
      folks! 'cos we can SEE it and we didnt invent it!

      hey! just for fun, lets FLY THE VIRUS INTO AN UNINFECTED area. yes, lets
      get the contaminated material and ship it to Surrey, UK - so that it has an
        even higher chance of infecting more people!

  6. My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by jkind · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Can someone please explain to me what it would take, scientifically, for the terrorists to "bottle up" and release a strain such as this in the continental USA?
    On second thought ... don't..
    On third thought, I'm sorry Michael Chertoff..

    --
    ~jennifer.k~
    1. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      For "the terrorists"? What terrorists?

      All I see 'round these parts are Americans letting themselves get deathly afraid of "the tur'rists" at every turn and surrendering their rights because of it.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    2. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      How easy? Simply infect themselves with it AND a normal influenza virus which is contagious. What is needed is a virus that is able to spread easily. Since they have already shown that they have no issue with their own death, it is likely that it will be done.

      Now, how do they know that it happens? Simple. Place somebody in the room who does not have the flu. Once infected, check it.

      If it is H5N1, then infect the carriers and send them on their way. Walking through airports is a very good way to spread it. Also small movies theaters, performances, indoor sporting events, and busses (such as greyhound) will be easy targets.

      If it is not H5N1, then infect them with it as well and try to get the recombinate.

      Of course, you could grow it in human cells, but you do have to have the knowledge and the material (FBS is expensive and is almost certainly being tracked at this point).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      How easy? Simply infect themselves with it AND a normal influenza virus which is contagious. What is needed is a virus that is able to spread easily. Since they have already shown that they have no issue with their own death, it is likely that it will be done.

      First of all, the possibility that a combination between the H5N1 and the "regular" influenza virus might combine in a new strain with the capabilities of both is just that, a possibility.

      Second, biological warfare has always had one major flaw: viruses can't tell friend from foe. To them we're all just dumb, slow, cows to feed off.

      If terrorists wanted to start a biological war they'd have had already done it. A human mind with a laboratory can produce something much more deadly than H5N1, which appared randomly in the wild. Why haven't they?

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    4. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      I keep being told that I am surrendering rights, but I can't quite figure out which ones. Please list specifics and not LLL talking points. Thank you.

    5. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      If terrorists wanted to start a biological war they'd have had already done it. A human mind with a laboratory can produce something much more deadly than H5N1, which appared randomly in the wild. Why haven't they?

      Well, a number of reasons. The first is that they easiest disease to use are also the easiest to stop. Consider Y. Pestis( Black Death/ Plague/etc). It wiped out something like 1/4 of Europe in 10 years during the middle ages. Interestingly, the Europeans made heavy use of it for biological warfare. But the problem is that it is a bacteria and they are possible to control (antibiotics).

      So you are left with Virus (and possibly prions).

      Most of these that we fear are the fast killing. Most forms of haemorrhagic fever is nasty, with Ebola being the worst. But it is also so fast acting, that it is easy to stop. A short quarantine is all that is needed to know who has it and who does not( you can then quickly isolate those that have it).

      So what is needed is something that takes a while to take hold or whose symptoms mimic others diseases. Avian Flu is, sadly, about the best choice that they have, since it appears to be one of many other flus that may run around (why is that person sneezing? send them home NOW; it will be a killer on our economy).

      Another nasty example of a possible killer would be to make HIV transmittable via a sneeze. If that ever happens, then the world will have major issues, since it takes so long to know that you have it. IOW, you could spread it for a year before it becomes known.

      Perhaps the scariest is Smallpox. When I was a child, I was inoculated against this. There are other here that will also have been inoculated. But we are far and few in between (besides, that was long ago, and the virus may have shifted). There are stockpiles in the world of this virus (in the USA, Russia, and it is thought, a few other places). If this is every released, there will be hell on earth. The number of deaths will be quick and high. By the time that we realized what we were up against and could take action (vaccinate), we would already have lost 1/4 of the world population.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      1. Your right to privacy. (patriot act I and II)
      2. Your right to not have the gov. know everything that you do. (again patriot act I/II)
      3. Your right to not have the military be used against civilians (see GWB's wanting approval of use of military in America).
      4. Your right to an attorney and a trial (several Americans have been held in Gitmo for 4 years nor are allowed to talk to attorneys).
      5. Your right to a free and unfettered press.
      6. Your right to know what and how our gov. operates (See www.justacitizen.org/sibel Edmund; likewise, look in on the white house traitor and how we are having a grand jury over this).
      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:My Biology skills are 1st year University.. by WindBourne · · Score: 1
      First of all, the possibility that a combination between the H5N1 and the "regular" influenza virus might combine in a new strain with the capabilities of both is just that, a possibility.

      While it is just a possibility by using true natural selection, this is much more than that. It may take 100-200 deaths, but it would succeed.

      Second, biological warfare has always had one major flaw: viruses can't tell friend from foe. To them we're all just dumb, slow, cows to feed off.

      Not entirely. Virus can (and have) been designed to target specific traits of their vectors. There were reports (but no hard data) that middle east countries were working on virus that targeted just Jews. Considering that most Jews came from the middle east and are probably closest to the average Muslem middle eastern, that will be difficult. However, if somebody like Al Qaida (mostly middle easterners) were to target Anglo-saxens, then it would hit Europe, America, and Canada in one clean swoop. In addition, all Al Qaida has to do is sit in their caves and not interact with society for awhile. But they would deserve what would happen to them if they are caught (and you can bet that any US president during that time would not have the choice to play games with catching OBL). Gitmo (and the other prisons that we have) would look like children at play.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Newsflash by mordors9 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ladies and gentlemen, we are awaiting the appearance of Chicken Little for her weekly news statement...... hold on..... word has just been released..... Chicken Little has been destroyed to prevent the spread of the avian flu after her recent visit to Romania. Perhaps this time the sky really is falling.

  8. Oh no,,, by Destroyed · · Score: 3, Funny

    As much as I hate to hear about these things, I cant help but think "Oh no I just had a BIRD FLU over my house..." ah.. ahaha.. hehe... argh.. OK! I'll shut up! But it was funny last night when I was at the bar.

  9. That's it... by unknown51a · · Score: 0

    ...I'm gonna be a vegetarian from now on. Curse my 3.1 chickens a week eating habits.

    --
    I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
  10. Service Degradation and Outages by RealBorg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that will heavily affect RFC2549 services - IP over avian carrier.

    1. Re:Service Degradation and Outages by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe you meant RFC1149. RFC2549 includes QoS, so is less likely to be affected.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  11. Don't take BBC/CNN by real in this by stm2 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Do you remember when CNN alerted about the super-computer virus that seems to be the end of the world?
    This could be the same, I suggest to follow specific sources instead of general news-media. With computer security, you now AV companies, Secunia, CERT and so on.
    For this, my bet is: http://www.fas.org/promed/

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    1. Re:Don't take BBC/CNN by real in this by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Bird flu... computer security .. insightful .. W.T.F???

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  12. Pathetic... by Armadni+General · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This response in Europe can be eqated to the little dance that boxers and wrestlers always do before a fight, just circling around, testing each other, somewhat afraid to hit the other.

    So, if we don't hit the opponent, to the tune of billions of dollars of fast-track pharmaceutical research, and immediate and strict quarantines, we are going to get hit first, and it will cost us dearly.

    These bloody poultry farmers, solely financially motivated, need to be brought down off their high horses, and realize that this isn't Mad Cow.

    1. Re:Pathetic... by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      Haha, "We are going to get hit first"

      Hey, thanks for counting us, those with the virus already in our countries, in your equation.

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    2. Re:Pathetic... by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for forgetting that this doesn't become a pandemic until it starts moving from human to human, in your "I'm foreign, I'm better than you Americans" recitation.

    3. Re:Pathetic... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      The Chirpies has killed fewer humans than lightning.

    4. Re:Pathetic... by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      However, whereas lightning has been around since the very beginning of weather, avian flu has been an issue for a comparatively short time.

    5. Re:Pathetic... by symbolic · · Score: 1

      It's not that pathetic. The recent track record of the US government with respect to what's REALLY going on in the world was cast into serious doubt with all the tripe about WMD in Iraq. I get the feeling that some people in high places are just ITCHING for a reason to declare a state of national emergency. If/when that happens, it's possible that you may have to kiss life as you know it, goodbye. The way things are currently structured, there will be far too much control in the hands of un-elected entities that will be excempt from judicial/congressional oversight.

    6. Re:Pathetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa.... so youre American? see your post didnt show that, but then your paranoia came shining through. Thanks for showing us just how self centred you are.

  13. Very good pun! by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Turkey has the bird flu?

    /thats all I have. Not very good after all.

    1. Re:Very good pun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know! When I first heard "Bird Flu found in Turkey", I burst out laughing. Everyone around me thought I was insane (Granted, I am..). Sadly, couldn't come up with any real good jokes.

  14. What I want to know is by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    South florida in the winter time fills up with birds migrating from all over. What i want to know is are there any migrations of birds from overseas such as africa and such?

    Will they bring it here this winter? the migrations have already begun and im seeing alot more birds around. Also chickens are allowed to roam the streets in downtown miami and key west in addition to the farms out here. If the migrating birds pass this onto the free roaming poultry you will have contaminated chicken feces here and there that would be in close proximity to people on a regular basis.

    1. Re:What I want to know is by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Informative

      What i want to know is are there any migrations of birds from overseas such as africa and such?

      I forget where I read it but I came across something that said the US was concerned about migratory paths through Alaska. Since parts of the Aleutian Islands, the Bering Strait, etc. provide land masses only tens of miles apart between the Russian and American mainlands it would provide easy stepping stones between the two continents. I'm not sure if there are any migratory paths along those routes or not, but it's definitely within the realm of possibilities. So while you may not see migratory routes directly between Africa and the US there's the possiblity of a path for the virus to north America through Alaska.

  15. Your rational skills are 1st year University.. by disc-chord · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am deeply saddened to see this comment coming from someone who has invested himself in higher education. Perhaps before they fill your head with all that troubling knowledge they should encourage skeptical thought?

    There are much more devestating agents that would appeal to those that wanted to strike a civilian population. Do not let your paranoia trump your common sense. The evil-brown-people do not want to eat your babies.

    1. Re:Your rational skills are 1st year University.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The evil-brown-people do not want to eat your babies.

      Correct.

      They wish to kill your babies.

    2. Re:Your rational skills are 1st year University.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "evil-brown-people" you mean a specific group of radical Muslims that also happens to include a variety of races (although mainly Arabic, or "brown"), then no, they don't want to eat your babies.

      But, as the post above me points out, they do want to kill them.

      Don't let the fact that they aren't an immediate danger to you in particular fool you into thinking they wouldn't kill you if they could.

      And don't fool yourself into thinking that people of your political persuasion (that arrogant little sentence you tacked onto the end leads me to assume you're extremely ant-Bush/anti-Bush supporter, to the point of making stupid generalizations about your opponents) aren't falling for that exact same illogic in the gp post.

  16. Oh No. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Danger! Danger, Will Robinson!!! There's a slight possibilty that this virus could mutate to pass from a bird to a human. And if that happens there's a slight possibilty that the virus could then mutate to pass from human to human. And if that happens there's a slight chance of a pandemic along the lines of the 1918 spanish influenza occuring, which had nothing to do with Spain, and the fact that it achieved such a high death count in the very year WWI ended was entirely coincidental. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST AS DEADLY REGARDLESS!!

    I call bull on the bird flu hype. It's likely this disease has been around for a much longer time that it has been fashionable to run frantic news reports on it.

    You know the hype is overblown just a wee bit when the government has to tell people to calm down.

    Take a Lemsip, chicken soup(no pun intended), some antibiotics, get a lot of rest and you'll be fine. I'm 99.9% certain. Remember SARS? Yeah, it's kind of hard to trust the doomsayers after that paticular fiasco.

    Bird Flu. Give me a break. Fatal Traffic Accidentitus. Now THERE'S a killer. 40,000 every year in the US alone. Are you scared to sit into your car every morning? You aren't!?!

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Oh No. by unknown51a · · Score: 0

      Scared to sit in my car every morning?

      You obviously haven't seen how my family drives, I'm ecstatic if we only have 3 near misses.

      --
      I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
    2. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antibiotics against a virus infection!? Gawd, you must be stupid...

    3. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the flu is a virus. all taking antibiotics would do is help to genetically engineer some super antibiotic-resistant bacteria that could cause the next global pandemic.

      so, yeah... don't do that.

    4. Re:Oh No. by elleomea · · Score: 3, Informative

      H5N1 the strain of avian flu that has people so worried has been infecting humans since 1997 and has a mortality rate of over 50% (after having infected a total of around 120 people). Since 1997 it's been combatted by massive cullings in all areas where outbreaks have been found (among birds). Currently it can only infect humans directly from birds through eating undercooked poultry. What people are worrying about is a strain that can be transmitted directly between humans, this has yet to happen.

    5. Re:Oh No. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I call bull on the bird flu hype. It's likely this disease has been around for a much longer time that it has been fashionable to run frantic news reports on it.

      And your credentials as an authority on this are...

      When I see goverments concerned with carrying pencils in airplanes is one thing. When I see them concerned with migratory birds passing a deadly virus, it's another.

      Can you comprehend the difference or should we draw a picture? Hint: ulterior motive. What would be the motive for spreading panic all over the world? This case is quite different from the terrorist hype.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    6. Re:Oh No. by isorox · · Score: 1

      I'm ecstatic if we only have 3 near misses.

      A near miss is surely a hit, as in, "I Nearly Missed"

    7. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a Lemsip,

      Uh, what?

      chicken soup(no pun intended), some antibiotics,

      Antibiotics won't do anything for a viral infection, and that's not even a pun, you ignorant fuck.

      get a lot of rest and you'll be fine. I'm 99.9% certain.

      And you are ... ? STFU.

    8. Re:Oh No. by halleluja · · Score: 1
      Parent has a good point; if we all go frantic and start killing off birds we are nowhere nearer to a solution.

      The problem is viruses will come and mutate, killing of the carriers does not extinct viruses, as has been proven time and time again with malaria.

      Save the birds!

    9. Re:Oh No. by Bonhamme+Richard · · Score: 1
      As I'm sure that many other /.ers are rushing to inform you, bird flu HAS transmitted from bird to human. It hasn't yet been confirmed to spread person to person, though they have some suspected cases. The lowest number I've heard on human deaths from bird flu is 60.

      In case your biological history is a little rough, smallpox, the plauge, AIDS, the flu and virtually ever other major human killer has started off as a animal illness, and then spread to people.

      I love your line of reasoning on SARS. Because a bunch of countries worked really hard to contain it, it was never a threat. So because we never ended the world during the Cold War, then nuclear weapons clearly were never a threat either.

      I agree that car crashes are a serious issue, but AIDS alone claims 3 millino deaths a year. How long ago was it that AIDS was as small as bird flu? If there's even a chance that it could cause that kind of damage, then I'd rather deal with it NOW.

      The only fiasco I see here is your misinformation.

    10. Re:Oh No. by LeFaux · · Score: 1
      And your credentials as an authority on this are...
      One of the top ten methods of disinformation is to attack the messanger or the messangers credintials without reguard to the facts at hand.
      When I see goverments concerned with carrying pencils in airplanes is one thing. When I see them concerned with migratory birds passing a deadly virus, it's another.
      FUD without supporting evidence is also high on the list of disinformation tactics. Emotional agrguments with no facts are also just so many more bits that we should flush without further consideration.
      Can you comprehend the difference or should we draw a picture? Hint: ulterior motive. What would be the motive for spreading panic all over the world? This case is quite different from the terrorist hype.
      Personally, I don't have any trouble comming up with possibilities or probabilities why "The Government" would be willing to further incite fear and extend control using any pretext at their disposal. Three primary disinformation tactics in a single message perhaps you should apply for a job at the Whitehouse, I believe that you would fit in well.
      --
      The lesser of two evils is still evil...
    11. Re:Oh No. by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      H5N1 the strain of avian flu that has people so worried has been infecting humans since 1997 and has a mortality rate of over 50% (after having infected a total of around 120 people)

      Yeah, in Asia where their healthcare is crap or non-existant. And maybe that 50% was older/unhealthy people. And maybe the number of infected people was well over 120, but no one ever found out because of, as I stated earlier, Asian crappy healthcare. So please, don't throw meaningless numbers around. That's what big media is for.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    12. Re:Oh No. by deltalimasierralima · · Score: 0

      Just because SAR did not spread in the US does not mean that its a fiasco. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a total of 8,098 people worldwide became sick with SARS during the 2003 outbreak. Of these, 774 died. Its true that people should not start to panic over Bird Flu yet, but we probably shouldn't be brushing it off as all hype...

    13. Re:Oh No. by wang33 · · Score: 1

      too bad my mod points just expired.
      Bravo on the George Carlin reference

      --
      PAGERANK++ Robsell.com
    14. Re:Oh No. by Sven+Tuerpe · · Score: 1
      H5N1 the strain of avian flu that has people so worried has been infecting humans since 1997 and has a mortality rate of over 50% (after having infected a total of around 120 people).

      So there is a 1-in-50,000,000 chance that I will die from H5N1 within the next 8 years? Scary!

      --
      http://erichsieht.wordpress.com/category/english/
    15. Re:Oh No. by tinytim · · Score: 1

      The idea that governments might use irrational fear to extend control is a good point.

      The rest is a troll. A quick google of "methods of disinformation" and checking against the very post alleging abuse proves it.

      See also http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm1600

    16. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Amongst the 120 people who have gotten sick enough to be tested, 50% have died. Many more have had light infections.

      60 dead/120 infected is bad. But 60 dead/hundreds or thousands infected isn't.

      Come on, people. I know that most people can't handle stats and science, but can't Slashdotters at least try?

    17. Re:Oh No. by photon317 · · Score: 1



      It's already been certain that it passes from birds to humans since at least 1997. It has had an average mortality rate in humans of somewhere in the neighborhood of ~70% in the various places it has crossed over significantly. The *only* thing between where it's at now and a worldwide pandemic that could wipe out millions of people is the mutation for human to human transmission (which apparently has a small chance of happening anytime a human or a pig manages to get infected simultaneously with this bird flu and a conventional human-to-human flu like we get every year). Go to the World Health Organization's website, google up the documents they have there that are directed at national-level policymakers and health officials on the subject. They spell out "likely major world catastrophe that we have no reasonable way to respond to in the next few years" pretty plainly. The US (as well as the rest of the world) won't have enough vaccine to cover even 10% of the population when and if it starts breaking out in human to human form. Lawmakers are already talking about new federal quarantine procedures and powers that might be neccesary when this hits in order to manage the geographic spread.

      All of that being said, there is nothing to do about as an average citizen of the world right now. The best plan on a personal level, as far as I can see, is:

      1. Pay more attention to good hygiene (which you should be doing anyways): Wash your hands often and correctly, eat with clean utensils, that kind of thing.
      2. If and when human to human transmission is confirmed anywhere in the world, start avoiding crowds, public restrooms, airports, and international travelers, and start taking that hygiene even more seriously.
      3. If and when it is obviously becoming a serious epidemic/pandemic, even if it isn't yet too bad in your area yet, get out of town if you live in a major city. Find a friend to stay with out of town in the country somewhere.

      Potentially somewhere inbetween 2 and 3, you may want a breathing mask for use in some situations which can filter the virus. The WHO has stated that masks sold in the US which conform to the standard "N-95" are up to the task. If you go to any hardware store or walmart, the disposable white 3M masks with the yellow ubber bands that go around the back of your head (that they sell near the paint supplies to keep you from huffing the fumes) that say "N 95" on them are readily available, cheap, and sufficient. You might wanna buy a packet of them ahead of time and throw them in the closet. What's a couple bucks just in case?

      --
      11*43+456^2
    18. Re:Oh No. by justins · · Score: 1
      Danger! Danger, Will Robinson!!! There's a slight possibilty that this virus could mutate to pass from a bird to a human.

      It can do that already. That's not the mutation everyone is worried about.

      It's likely this disease has been around for a much longer time that it has been fashionable to run frantic news reports on it.

      Come on, that's just ignorant. The virus has probably been around a long time. The virus changes. Evolution. Darwin. I Ching.

      Take a Lemsip, chicken soup(no pun intended), some antibiotics, get a lot of rest and you'll be fine. I'm 99.9% certain.

      And who the fuck are you?

      Remember SARS? Yeah, it's kind of hard to trust the doomsayers after that paticular fiasco.

      Yeah, all the silly scientists with their silly preventative measures. What a waste of money that all was!!!!
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    19. Re:Oh No. by justins · · Score: 1
      No. Amongst the 120 people who have gotten sick enough to be tested, 50% have died. Many more have had light infections.

      You can't possibly know that, although you're right to point out a possible source of uncertainty. And it's not the only source of uncertainty: in the poorer areas especially, some will have become sick and even died without being properly diagnosed.

      And in any case the point still stands: 50% mortality rate for those who are being treated. It's just dumb not to take that seriously.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    20. Re:Oh No. by justins · · Score: 1
      Yeah, in Asia where their healthcare is crap or non-existant.

      That's a good point, although it applies much more to Indonesia than to China. One of the things I worry about, though, is an outbreak where everyone gets sick all at once. American hospitals would run out of beds nice and quick, and treatment conditions would be not be great.

      And maybe that 50% was older/unhealthy people.

      The mortality rate for Spanish Flu was highest for people in the 25-34 age group. There are a number of theoretical explanations for that, but healthy people in this age bracket definitely aren't immortal.

      So please, don't throw meaningless numbers around.

      They aren't meaningless. They could use a little context, but they certainly aren't meaningless. "Mortality rate" still has a certain fundamental meaning, even in these enlightened postmodern times.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    21. Re:Oh No. by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      Remember SARS? Yeah, it's kind of hard to trust the doomsayers after that paticular fiasco.

      You misunderstand the intent of 'doomsayers'- they don't want you to ignore their warnings and say I-told-you-so after the apocalypse (except for the bitter kind who believe that some certain personal trait or skill or belief they have and you don't will spare them from the danger), they want people to deal with the problem so that disaster is averted.

      I call bull on the bird flu hype. It's likely this disease has been around for a much longer time that it has been fashionable to run frantic news reports on it.

      If this were a rational world in which all people make rational decisions on how to allocate resources, then this may be an argument worth heeding. Sometimes people or governments need to have problems overhyped to them or else they won't do anything at all until it's already cost a lot of money or killed a lot of people.

      Fatal Traffic Accidentitus. Now THERE'S a killer. 40,000 every year in the US alone. Are you scared to sit into your car every morning?

      Traffic accidents are not a communicable disease, even if you give it a silly name which suggests that it is. A person's driving skill and attitude correlates very strongly, as well as the degree in which the government maintains roads, warnings, prosecutes traffic law violators, etc- both of those things change very slowly over a period of years. The problem is well-understood and has a stable feedback system which keeps the number of fatalities from spinning out of control. When one argues about the number of fatalities being too much, you are in effect participating in that feedback system- perhaps people will listen to you and be more willing to sacrifice tax dollars or driving freedoms and then vote different and so forth.

      Diseases which spread very rapidly and are potentially fatal are scary because we don't have systems in place to deal with them, or we do have systems but don't really know how effective they are. Worse yet, our systems may be superb but if an another country is asleep at the wheel then their inattention may create a problem so big it will get past our defenses too.

    22. Re:Oh No. by justins · · Score: 1
      One of the top ten methods of disinformation is to attack the messanger or the messangers credintials without reguard to the facts at hand.

      The messanger [sic] in this case asserted his authority with his "I'm 99.9% certain" business and didn't give anything in the way of actual evidence. Attacking his authority was called for IMO, since, well, he doesn't have any. Or evidence.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    23. Re:Oh No. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >Take a Lemsip, chicken soup(no pun intended), some antibiotics, get a lot of rest and you'll be fine.

      And your medical credientials are?

      Do you even know that a cytokine storm is?
      http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-cytokine-storm .htm

      >Remember SARS? Yeah, it's kind of hard to trust the doomsayers after that paticular fiasco.

      Are you saying that SARS had no impact on anyone? Do you know how much economic damage it did? SARS was a test case of what a minor outbreak is (~1000 deaths worldwide). They are conserivatvely estimating ~7 million deaths if avian flu can be transmitted from human to human.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    24. Re:Oh No. by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      You do realize that antibiotics are for germs and bacteria and not for viruses? Chicken soup is good for the soul, but it hasn't been proven to stop viruses in their tracks.
      What you don't understand is that if a virus such as this was to mutate into an airborne virus it would be a lot easier to contract than Fatal Traffic Accidents.

      Think about all the people you know that catch a flu every year. Not think about what would happen if one out of 10 of them die. (Considering that the mortality rate drops from the current 50% rate to a 10% during the mutation.) Truckers, teachers, grocery store workers, cops, doctors, hot chicks at the bar...

      It's not something to be taken lightly.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    25. Re:Oh No. by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until a person with a regular flu, eats undercooked chicken soup, and catches the bird flu. Then the virus with mutate within that person, and a new strain could infect his mother/girlfriend and viola! - instant pandemic, just add water.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    26. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that viola coming into play ?

    27. Re:Oh No. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      What government are you talking about? The US government? The rest of us are talking about Europe.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    28. Re:Oh No. by MarkTina · · Score: 1

      Wow! Someone woke up bed tempered this morning!

      Yes the guys advise might be a little suspect, but was there any reason to dig his eyes out with a spoon ?

    29. Re:Oh No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb shit! When the Spanish flu hit in 1918, 40,000,000 died. ....not as a result of the war! It spread to all non-warring areas of the world (there is one isolated place in South America with a population over 10,000 people that was not affected ....the only place in the world. And yeah, car accidents kill 40,000 Americans per year. Bird flu can kill at a (known) rate of 120,000 per day! The only solice I take in your flippant attitude to the situation is that you shall (very) quickly join the multitude now gracing the pages of the Darwin Awards. I shall look forward to reading you!

    30. Re:Oh No. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      What people are worrying about is a strain that can be transmitted directly between humans, this has yet to happen.

      Because one day he might give WMD to terrorists. Oh wait, wrong discussion. Or is it?

      This is just another media scare, useful to sell more copy. Nothing more. In six months it'll be something else.

    31. Re:Oh No. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The messanger [sic] in this case asserted his authority with his "I'm 99.9% certain" business and didn't give anything in the way of actual evidence.

      I was giving my opinion, not exerting my authority. I can see no reason that anyone, anyone, would have considered my post to have been anything other than a lone, personal statement.

      I would also note, that I did give my reasons for my opinion by referring to the SARS outbreak, and the media hype surrounding that.

      Amid all the attacks on my credentials, and misuse of the term "antibiotics", everyone seems to have forgotten that my primary point was that the threat and outcome of any pandemic, has been greatly exaggerated and hyped by the media. So many people have jumped on the hype bandwagon, that people have had to urged to calm down, as stated in the linked article.

      I remain skeptical of the pessimistic predictions of the possibilty of the outbreak. And I remain especially contemptuous of the current reckless and unjustified media scaremongering surrounding this issue, which is being motivated by ratings based profit. And unless I can see concrete evidence to the contrary, I consider a highly lethal pandemic in _western_ society, relatively improbable.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    32. Re:Oh No. by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Is it possible that the 50-70% mortality rate is the rate of those taken to a medical facility for treatment - skewed heavily towards those who died - and that many more people have come in contact with the virus, but not gotten sick enough to seek treatment? Especially in rural areas with minimal health care facilities?

      Sample a population in the affected area for exposure to the virus, and then count up the fatalities, and then I'll begin to believe this statistic.

      Fear and "bags of free government money" have a way of corrupting objective science. Extrapolating pandemics based on 120 of a relatively unrepresentative sample and then misallocating health care resources is not responsible science or public policy.

      Remember the "We're all going to die from ebola" scare from 10 years ago? It never happened. One of the characteristics for diseases is if that one is truly this virulent (50% mortality), then it will be locally contained. Widespread outbreaks occur with weak strains.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  17. Flu Wiki by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a Flu Wiki that's a good starting point for information about avian influenza. For people who want to follow the news more closely, they can wander over to this discussion board.

  18. Double "huh"? by jpellino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (a) no surprises yet - you can't stop migrating birds - especially during migration season;
    (b) if /. is the place you're finally hearing about this - we need to talk.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Double "huh"? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      (a) no surprises yet - you can't stop migrating birds - especially during migration season;

      I think between anti-aircraft guns, shot guns and a few other weapons we've developed in the past few hundred years that we could stop migrating birds. There just won't be many birds left alive afterwards.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  19. First create a scare by TarrySingh · · Score: 1

    and then you can hike up prices again. Great!! But seriously it's a containable issue, no need to fret. Just choose cautiously (when you'rev buying chicken). Or turn into a vegetarian.

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  20. Every part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There have always been famines, tsunamis, floods and earthquakes in any given year. Very convenient for those that think the end is near. They always think the end is near. The end has never been near. The Bible is just an early example of a news outlet that wants eyeballs. And if you want eyeballs, if it bleeds it leads. The bird flu is a big problem, but I think the threat to humans is over-hyped by the media. Remember all those stories last year during the vaccine shortage that had all those geezers in long lines? How did that hype-fest turn out?

    1. Re:Every part! by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

      Very convenient for those that think the end is near. They always think the end is near. The end has never been near.

      You just wait another 4 billion years pal! The sun is going to go ape shit and swallow the earth in a blaze of superheated plasma ... then we doom and gloomers will be right there to say "told you so!"

    2. Re:Every part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The sky is falling, the sky is falling." --C. Little

    3. Re:Every part! by Lussarn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is it true? Let's nuke the sun.

      - G.W. Bush, Jr.

    4. Re:Every part! by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      And while we're at it, Wolf! Wolf! WoooooooooooooolF!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    5. Re:Every part! by megarich · · Score: 1
      Very convenient for those that think the end is near. They always think the end is near.

      But this society has weapons(i.e nuclear) that can wipe out the world with just a hit of the switch which past societies didn't have. Past societies also didn't have an reliance of oil or have cities built upon oil to the point survival is futile without it like the way we do...

      And the end is always near 'cause life is short and when you do die, that is the end for you;)

    6. Re:Every part! by roguenine2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "but I think the threat to humans is over-hyped by the media." Tell that to the 50 million people who died from bird flu in 1918.

    7. Re:Every part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you happen to believe that biblical rot, then your worried over nothing. First, god said that he would destroy the heavans and the earth, so do you think he'd let man do it. Secondly there is the tribulation, the thousand year reign of the antichrist, then the millenial reign of christ after which the heavans and earth are destroyed. So were looking at a very long time frame. What most folks spouting this end of times nonsense mean is they hope the rapture is near. Of those there are two beliefs, pre and post tribulation rapture. The pre tribulation rapture folks are pussies who think that god will spare them these trials and tests. The post tribulation rapture folks don't think god will spare anyone this test of faith.
      Personally, I believe the universe has always folded and unfolded as it should.

    8. Re:Every part! by bigberk · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not so sure that the threat is overhyped. Pandemics do happen from time to time and prove to be quite effective in wiping out large percents of populations (animals, and human). Take a look at a chart of human population growth -- the 1918 event is quite visible. The Spanish Flu in 1918 infected over 1/5 of the world's population and this was during a period of relatively slow international travel. Ignoring the potential danger to us all would be just foolish. So what exactly do you mean "the end has never been near?" Go hunt through historical accounts in your area and you will find documentation describing how the spanish flu brought the end to many in your community. To survive you have to acknowledge and prepare to deal with risks.

    9. Re:Every part! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Actually quite a few old geezers died because of the flu shortage. They keeled over while waiting in the vaccine line.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Every part! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But this society has weapons(i.e nuclear) that can wipe out the world"
      Nope. can't do it.Won't happen.

      The *world* will survive.
      It will continue to spin, and orbit.

      You need a wider perspective; the widespread use of nuclear weapons will make the world less habitable *by humans*, but the world will survive. Life itself will survive. Some species will be more successful in the new ecosystem.

      Don't think of it as a human holocaust, that's so depressing. Think of it as the wonderful day of liberation and free food for cockroaches.

    11. Re:Every part! by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      They always think the end is near. The end has never been near.
      On the contrary, the end will always be near.
      Just like commercially viable fusion will always be available within five years.
      Or Duke Nukem Forever will always be out next year.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    12. Re:Every part! by http101 · · Score: 1

      If we're still living here in 4 billion years, yeah, sure. In 4 billion years, one of three things will happen... A) We'll invent some sort of hyper-space transport drive that will allow us to not only travel through space, but have space travel through us. B) We'll all die. C) An alien race will save us from our own impending doom and make us their bitches. I don't know about you, but I welcome our new leaders! :-D

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
  21. Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April 05 by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is a REAL virus, not a computer virus. Influenza can actually mutate (very fast because it uses RNA rather than DNA to encode its genome.) It may well be, and we must certainly hope, that this is not going to make the jump to our specie and also become highly contagious, in which case it becomes another pandemic. But, even if the odds are 100:1 against this happening, spending resources addressing this are well spent. In the last century, there have been multiple infuenza outbreaks. The largest of this in 1918 dwarfed the First World War as the leading cause of death in 1918. This is very high stakes.

    So forgive me if I am underwhelmed by a web site that quotes ten year old research papers and where the emerging deseases pages don't list (any strain) of influenza and hasn't been updated since April.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  22. I'm sure by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    their beliefs are already confirmed about allah embracing their movement after hurricane katrina damaged the oil infrastructure in the gulf.

    Their faith would be further strengthened by a bird flu epidemic devestating western countries.

    Honestly though. Their society is healthier than ours. Our birthrates are dropping like crazy because people here have better things to do than have children. They have a more unified way of thinking which is more powerful than many individuals all pursuing their own interests. See recent american war protests for examples. Our society is also growing ever more calcified in red tape as corporations control it.

    My idea was always that the more zealous a civilization is around their religion the more powerful and productive a society will become once it starts to loosen up a bit because it will be incredibly disciplined. Eventually when all the taboos are gone, theres no juice left and it falls apart. Perhaps extremist muslims are simply the new puritans.

    1. Re:I'm sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your reality check is in the mail.

  23. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    um, how about "you're an idiot"?

    The most doom-laden worst-case scenarios I've seen are 50,000 deaths in the UK (i.e. about one in a thousand people), with the death-rate disproportionately borne by the very young, the very old, and those with impaired immune systems. An appalling tragedy should it happen, but a long way off the end of the world as we know it.

  24. Romania?? by AsnFkr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not mentioned in the article is how the flu is actually turning birds into vampires. Seriously.

    1. Re:Romania?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally, *someone* Had to post something related to vampires, however retarded it may be. The storry of "Dracula" was invented by someone who probably didn't even know which continent Romania is on. I'm a romanian and the only time I even talked about vampires (very rare) was when I was discussing some idiot american movie that had "vampire characters" .. It's offending when people sound like the only reason they have even heard of Romania is because of "Count Dracula" (that and the vast number of script kiddies/got psybnc friend people .......)

    2. Re:Romania?? by Karma_fucker_sucker · · Score: 2, Funny
      The storry of "Dracula" was invented by someone who probably didn't even know which continent Romania is on.

      I'm an American, and I know it's in Europe. And not only that, I know Romania is in Italy. Because that's where the Roman empire was and the city of Rome, so obviously, Romania is in Italy.
      Oh wait, Romain lettuce is grown in California USA, so maybe Romania is in the USA.

      Oh fuck it! I don't know!

      --
      Evil people don't think they're evil. - George Lucas, Making of Ep III
    3. Re:Romania?? by lahvak · · Score: 1

      No, no, You've got it all wrong! Everybody knows that the Romany people (aka gypsies) came from Egypt. Ergo, Romania must be in Egypt.

      You have to admit that this theory is much more romantic!

      --
      AccountKiller
  25. Chicken Shit by Delifisek · · Score: 1

    BAH !!!

    Wake up guys

    Does any one know daily raito of iraq civillian deaths ?

    I work for Turkey biggest Poultry producter for 5 years.

    This is noting. No body

    I REPAT NO HUMAN DEAD BECAUSE OF THIS.

    Just some Turkey and some Chicken.

    Also this can be biological attack from somwhere.

    Wake up guys

    In Pakistan ther was 40.000 dead
    more than 3.3 millon home less.
    Winter was coming.

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
    1. Re:Chicken Shit by peterprior · · Score: 1

      You forgot "Sorry for my english :("

    2. Re:Chicken Shit by cozzano · · Score: 0

      I REPAT NO HUMAN DEAD BECAUSE OF THIS. Eh - what? Where are you getting your information? There most certainly are humans who are dead because they have contracted bird-flu. Not many, but then it hasn't made the all important leap from bird to humans - and be infectious. When it does, we're all in very big trouble because we simply cannot make enough vaccine. Yes, we can make vaccine for it - no we can't make enough to even cover a tenth of the population of the US. The media (as always) are looking for a big story, and have now managed to panic a lot of people. Bird flu has been around for a long time, and a lot of research has being going into in - however not that birds with the flu are migrating the media has launched it into a huge story - always with the line 'But it doesn't pose a threat to humans yet' tagged onto the end. The perfect example of this is the posted /. article (again as always) sensationalising as much as possible. Coz

    3. Re:Chicken Shit by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Europe, dot is used to separate 10^3's and comma to indicate decimal. so 40,000 is 40 to this guy. 40.000 is 40 000 to at least 300 000 000 of us :). So stop being a smart ass about the wrong thing. Focus on his english instead, which really sucks. However I bet this guy is smarter than you because unlike you, he is partly bilingual. Turkish is not Greek or Chinese but is definetely a much more complicated language than English and you should show respect to ppl who can speak it.

    4. Re:Chicken Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Turkish is not Greek or Chinese but is definetely a much more complicated language than English and you should show respect to ppl who can speak it.

      Um, I don't know how to say this respectfully, but this is an idiotic argument. Little children easily learn Greek, Turkish, Chinese, English, and dozens of other languages. To argue that the little child who learned Turkish deserves more respect for that linguistic accomplishment than the little child who learned English is, well, poorly thought out at best.

    5. Re:Chicken Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Respect people solely because they can speak a language? Even if it's all bullshit?

      More complicated than English? I think you mean different from (it's not more complicated for one born in Turkey).

      Stop smoking whatever shit you're smoking, people might think you are the grandparent troll logging on with a different UID.

      p.s. I'm bilingual myself and guess what; morst europeans and americans are!

    6. Re:Chicken Shit by rastos1 · · Score: 1
      More complicated than English? I think you mean different from (it's not more complicated for one born in Turkey).

      English is a language where nouns are always the same - with the exception 's' in plural. In my language the expressions, "dog", "from dog", "to dog", "about dog", "with dog" each have a different form of the word "dog". Another set of forms for plural. The table is "he", the chair is "it" and the roof is "she" - each noun has this kind of property. Each adjective as well. In Russian language it is similar. In German less so, but still more complicated than in English. So yes, English is an easy language in comparison.

      And regarding respect: kids in EU start learning 2nd language at age of 6 - in basic school. Obligatory. They often learn 3rd language later. I don't see that happening in US (correct me if I'm wrong). And being able to learn language so different from your own _does_ deserve respect.

    7. Re:Chicken Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO ONE is going to realize that this is a CLICHE JOKE from Fark.com's forums.

      Perhaps you should have mentioned that, 'cause you look retarded here.

  26. secure food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all food I eat is flat, it has to be to be pushed under the door into my room. I eat mostly processed cheese. See birdybirdy aint flat.
    Go secure, go flat

  27. My survival tips. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    Deadbolts on appartment. Check...
    Month supply of food and water. Check...
    Loaded shotgun with a month supply of ammo. Check...

    Ya, the world will shutdown. But fuck it, I don't want to catch this bug. I will stay low!

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:My survival tips. by LilWolf · · Score: 1

      Loaded shotgun with a month supply of ammo

      Just out of curiosity..how do you count a months supply of ammo? x persons shot per day?

    2. Re:My survival tips. by gronofer · · Score: 1
      I don't know if you can avoid it like this. You have to come out sooner or later, and the flu will still be out there waiting.

      Epidemics only stop when everybody has been infected or perhaps vaccinated, so that they are either resistant or dead.

      But look at the bright side, if the mortality rate is high, and you survive, there may be plenty of cheap real estate available afterwards, and it will be good for the environment (except for birds, and other susceptible species).

    3. Re:My survival tips. by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he was intending to shoot the virii, as they slipped under the door or came down the chimney. I think you'd need extra ammo, since they are small and hard to hit, but very numerous.

    4. Re:My survival tips. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I was being partly funny ;). Though I wouldn't need a months supply of ammo, it IS a good idea to keep a loaded weapon withen reach for when shit-hit-the-fan. Because when the death toll rises and total chaos sets up, you cannot depend on 911 to fight off those apes wanting to gain access to your food and water.

      if 1/3rd the population in the US dies off, do you really think there will be civility to depend on? Hell no, once panic sets in, you have to lean on primal instinct to survive

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  28. In Other News ... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    McDonalds is introducing a 2 for 1 Chicken McNugget promotion

  29. Tweeet by gazmercer · · Score: 1

    ATCHOO!!! First came Mad Cows. Now mad birds (with the FLU). ATCHOO!! Excuse me, think I have a cold. ATCHOO !! TWEET TWEET! ATCHOO !!

    1. Re:Tweeet by rupert0 · · Score: 1

      You forgot west nile virus and african american bees .....

      --
      RUPERT! I TOLD YOU TO WATCH THE BAGS! You were looking at the boys again, WEREN'T YOU.
  30. Damn! by Winckle · · Score: 1

    I love my RFC2549 service, no bandwith limits at all!
    Shame about the latency.

  31. This is insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First famine.
    Then Tsunami.
    Then Flood and earthquake.
    Now a plauge.

    Which part of the bible is this again?


    Shit, it's part of half the late night horror/monster flicks too. // disgusted contempt for mods

  32. Don't Panic by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you are a poultry worker or otherwise handle wild fowl you are not at risk. This disease is spread bird to man but not man to man.

    If a farmer wants to protect his livestock from being destroyed he's being nuaghty but he's not directly endangering that many people in that single act. It's stupid and socially irresponsible. But it's also not something that is that out of line with common practices in other areas.

    There are a variety of zoonotic diesaases that can be transmitted to animal handlers and we don't panic over those. Most Flu's in fact come from Bird's via pigs. And many of those, unlike bird flu, can be transmitted from man to man.

    There's loads of prarie dog and mouse diseases with high fatality rates in human's like Yserina Pestis or Hanta Virus. Yet we don't all wear bunny suits when we put out mouse traps in your houses. The people who vaccum prarie dog warrens to transplant them are actying just as rashly. Pox viruses can be caught from animals and have killed more humans than all viruses in histroy combined.

    Yet we don't panic over these. This is all rubbish except to the poultry industry workers and owners. Not that the farmer's should not be prudent and do the right thing and slaughter their animals. But they have a right to ask not for an over reaction or excess culling.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Don't Panic by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1
      The people who vaccum prarie dog warrens to transplant them are actying just as rashly.
      You need to research WHY prairie dogs are vacuumed up and usually sold in the asian market... the SOLE reason is because a prairie dog town can cost the lives of many, many cattle if they build the town on pasture land. cattle come along and step in the holes, result in a nice clean snap of the cows leg(s). prairie dogs will also strip a landscape bare of almost all vegetation in the vicinity of their town...
    2. Re:Don't Panic by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      That is why I can't understand the idiocy of not prohibiting hunting starting now. In all EU countries it's just an expensive sport, but it provides a means for the virus to infect humans that get in contact with the wild, possibly infected animals. It's just a caprice the general population can do without in order to minimize risk...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    3. Re:Don't Panic by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      I think you've missed the point.

      People for the most part don't care that a few poultry workers have gotten sick, people are worried that a new flu virus our immune systems have never seen before, one with a 50% mortality rate on fit young people, is about to make the species jump and become human to human transmittable the same way the human flu is.

      This is what happened in 1918, and as you said yourself "Most Flu's in fact come from Bird's".

    4. Re:Don't Panic by Angostura · · Score: 1

      I don't see that the original poster has missed the point at all. Currently the disease is very bad news for birds and bad news for poultry workers, it has few implications for the general population. I think it's pretty inevitable that this will become a human-human infective virus, but we are not there yet.

    5. Re:Don't Panic by m50d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My god man, learn to use an apostrophe properly. I can't stand to look at that post.

      --
      I am trolling
    6. Re:Don't Panic by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Unless you are a poultry worker or otherwise handle wild fowl you are not at risk. This disease is spread bird to man but not man to man.

      Don't be so sure. There's has been a case in Asia where a girl appears to have contracted it from her brother. They haven't been able to connect her illness with any poultry.

      (I read the article last night, but haven't been able to find it this morning)

    7. Re:Don't Panic by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Tried another set of search keywords, and found it:

      http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051014/hl_afp/health fluvirusdrugtamiflu_051014160640

      More unsettling is that the virus in this particular patient developed a resistance to Tamiflu -- the drug being stockpiled to fight a flu epidemic.

    8. Re:Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pox viruses can be caught from animals and have killed more humans than all viruses in histroy combined.

      Consider pox viruses a finite subset P of the set of viruses V. The cardinality of P = V. It follows that Deaths from P = Deaths from V, a contradiction of your statement.

    9. Re:Don't Panic by JerkyBoy · · Score: 1
      Normally, I'd agree that we shouldn't panic, as it tends to create more of a mess of things... But the current US Administration has really dropped the ball here:
      The U.S. finds itself at the very end of the world's order line for Tamiflu (Canada, France, Britain and Japan all laid in ample stocks well in advance). What an egregious act of negligence by a government so obsessed with the threat of terrorism and conquering Iraq that it averts its eyes from an oncoming disease tsunami.
      Frankly, I'm concerned.
      --


      Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
    10. Re:Don't Panic by doktor-hladnjak · · Score: 1
      The 1918 epidemic killed millions worldwide, but the mortality rate was nowhere near 50%. According to this site,

      The influenza virus had a profound virulence, with a mortality rate at 2.5% compared to the previous influenza epidemics, which were less than 0.1%

    11. Re:Don't Panic by bookhappy · · Score: 1

      My Heavens Man! You've totally missed the point. Have you no children. No grandchildren! Don't you realize what this is going to do to the price of a Chicken MacNugget Happy Meal! If the disease spreads through the avian population, and millions of birds are killed, the American economy will come to a complete halt. Imagine this: nuggets cannot be found at any price. Families stop going to Ronnie Mac's. (Afterall, we only go because of the threat of boo-boo faces.) RonnieMac then stops buying billions of potatos. Washington state and Idaho declare bankruptcy. China declares the same after billions of dollars of orders for cheap McMeal toys are cancelled. My lord, man, it will be another dark ages.

    12. Re:Don't Panic by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1

      I am aware of that, I've seen the mortality rate of spanish flu put as low as 1%, but at 2.5% it still managed to kill in months more people than AIDS has killed worldwide, ever.

      As H5N1 mutates, its mortatality rate is expected to drop, and as the pandemic progresses it should drop off even further. I made reference to 1918 because the parent poster kept saying that because it was a birdflu we were all safe and had no reason to worry unless we worked with poultry.

  33. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Although we have advanced technologically since the last serious epidemic and are able to communicate effectively allowing people to take precautions, there exists one serious difference between modern Western society and previous. Our ultra clean lifestyles of the last 50 years or so mean our imune systems have not faced the daily bacteria count of previous generations. While we may appear healthier and wealthier, are we really as robust?

    VIRUS IS NOT BACTERIA. Viruses are always, constantly, wildly mutating, always have, always will be. The viruses out there today are not the same that roamed the land 50 years ago. As a result, our immune systems are not adapted to what our grandpa's was.

    It makes NO difference how "tough" you are. We're talking about an unexpected random mutation producing a particularly deadly virus. It can happen anytime. Sometimes, quite seldom, thank God, other factors appear which make it even more dangerous, such as ability to spread using wildlife.

    The interesting thing, for me, is not this fact. This has been known for decades. No, the truly interesting fact is that despite all our knowledge, the solution is still hampered by our economic models and by good old greed.

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  34. Actually... it has seen Human-Human transmission by Genady · · Score: 1

    The relevant quote from wikipedia:

    Vietnam and Thailand have seen several isolated cases where human-to-human transmission of the virus has been suspected. In one case the original carrier, who received the disease from a bird, was held by her mother for roughly 5 days as the young girl died. Shortly afterwards, the mother became ill and perished as well. In March, 2005 it was revealed that two nurses who had cared for avian flu patients have tested positive for the disease.

    Sourced from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H5N1

    It's not apparently easily transmittable, but it does seem transmittable.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  35. Chickens, ducks, Geese and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..since the 1st of October Turkeys too!

  36. An overlooked solution? by beforewisdom · · Score: 0, Troll

    Avian flu is dangerous because people get if from eating livestock and then spread it to other people.

    It is also starting to be believed that mad cow can be spread to people without the victim having to eat diseased meat. "Prions" which can give you the disease are near indestructible. Mad Cow has been found in the US though the media has played it down.

    Neither of these diseases would be a problem if so much livestock was not raised, and if people did not eat meat.

    People may like meat, but most people do need it to live or even to make interesting tasty meals.

    So, human beings are going to risk creating a world wide, deadly, flu epidemic ala Stephen King all for the sake of one choice for dinner over another.

    That does not sound very rational.

    If you want to reduce your risk of these diseases, these links can help you reduce the amount of meat you eat:

    http://tryveg.com/cfi/toc/

    http://www.veganhealth.org/sh/

    1. Re:An overlooked solution? by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Informative
      I was expecting to see my post modded down. It is interesting that it got modded down with the label "troll".

      Trolls post off topic and/or with no interest in the forum other than disrupting it into flames.

      My post was not off topic. The thread was about the avian flu and the avian flu is being spread through livestock. Given that I don't think bringing up eliminating livestock is off topic, it is just an unpopular idea.

      Pulling apart that "troll" label a little further I also have a significant posting history which anyone can see. It is obvious I am not on slashdot for the sole purpose of jerking people's chains.

      My post may be modded down as low as it can go, but karma was and will remain "excellent".

      The only thing the mods have accomplished in modding my post down is proving is that they have a low tolerance for views other than their own.

      A sure sign of a provincial and narrow mind.

      No offense.



        Avian flu is dangerous because people get if from eating livestock and then spread it to other people.

      It is also starting to be believed that mad cow can be spread to people without the victim having to eat diseased meat. "Prions" which can give you the disease are near indestructible. Mad Cow has been found in the US though the media has played it down.

      Neither of these diseases would be a problem if so much livestock was not raised, and if people did not eat meat.

      People may like meat, but most people do need it to live or even to make interesting tasty meals.

      So, human beings are going to risk creating a world wide, deadly, flu epidemic ala Stephen King all for the sake of one choice for dinner over another.

      That does not sound very rational.

      If you want to reduce your risk of these diseases, these links can help you reduce the amount of meat you eat:

      http://tryveg.com/cfi/toc/ [tryveg.com]

      http://www.veganhealth.org/sh/ [veganhealth.org]

  37. Nothing new under the sun by euthman · · Score: 4, Informative
    Millennialsists love to fixate on the natural ebb and flow of disasters to give credence to their nutty prophecies of the End of the World. In fact, what we are seeing now is nothing new, and much worse plagues have occurred in post-Biblical times:

    The Plague of Justinian was possibly the most devastating pestilence of the ancient world. Lasting fifty years, it arrived in the Imperial capital, Constantinople, in 542 A.D. Mortality in the city reached as high as 10,000 per day. Ships were loaded with the dead, towed out to sea, and abandoned. Fortification towers were unroofed, filled with corpses, then re-roofed.

    The most famous pandemic was the Black Death, which, like a lot of the perturbations that perennially rattled the cage of Western Civilization (Aryans, Mongols, Huns, Turks, gunpowder, etc) originated in Asia. From 1346 to 1361, the epidemic killed up to one-third of the population of Europe.

    The last pandemic ravaged Europe in the seventeenth century and is best known to us as the Plague of London, 1665-66. This is the one chronicled by Samuel Pepys in his diary (which most of us didn't mind reading in high school because of all the sexual content). Since the printing press was now available, this was the first epidemic in which the populace was kept thoroughly informed of the latest in cutting-edge medical knowledge. One pamphlet informed its readers that the plague was caused by "eating radishes, a cat catter wouling, immoderate eating of caviare and anchovies, tame pigeons that flew up and down an alley, and drinking strong heady beer." Rumors that syphilis prevented the disease caused the gentlemen of London to storm local houses of ill-repute. English physicians apparently knew better; many just left the country.

    --
    Ed Uthman, MD
    Pathologist, Houston/Richmond, TX, USA
    1. Re:Nothing new under the sun by DingerX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heh. Funny, somewhere on my harddrive I have my old transcription a sermon by Pope Clement VI in the fall of 1348. His message was much the same, although his historical list of plagues was somewhat longer (and, oddly enough, his accounts were slightly less fictitious than the parent): "remember the plague of justinian and all the others before that; this isn't the end of the world folks."


      Pandemics like the plague are quite commonly preceded by epizootics. The virus or bacillus multiplies itself over and over again. All it needs to kill lots of humans is a vector. It's one mutation away, and each day that it spreads through the bird/pig/human population, is one more day it gets that chance to find it.

    2. Re:Nothing new under the sun by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      In fact, what we are seeing now is nothing new, and much worse plagues have occurred in post-Biblical times:

      I don't really understand the point of this post- historical precedent is no reason for complacency. Also, past pandemics have been aggravated by poor sanitation and medicine but simultaneously limited by poor transportation. So any contemporary repeat of the same kinds of plagues may have wildly different results.

    3. Re:Nothing new under the sun by arron_nz · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Spanish Flu Pandemic that killed 25-50 million people last century.. I think we could be looking at a similar scale of destruction with the modern bird flu.

      --
      garble
    4. Re:Nothing new under the sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the plauge of media brainwashing that has been occuring since the advent of modern psychology. Or the plauge of scaremongering by companies trying to pedal vaccines.

      Or how about the plauge of product spam that is here at slashdot

  38. 1918 Flu Epidemic caused by bird flu mutating by tehanu · · Score: 1

    As an example of what can occur when an avian (or any animal really) strain of flu jumps to humans can be seen in the Great Flue Epidemic of 1918 aka. the Spanish Flu that killed more people than WWI. According to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Flu) it is believed that the flu originated in Fort Riley, Kansas (yes, it is somewhat ironic that this place is one of the strongholds in the US against evolutionary theory) when a strain of avian flu jumped to humans. Scientists who reconstructed the virus believe that it passed directly to humans from chickens at Fort Riley. The popular story is that a cook at Fort Riley had the normal human flu when he was preparing a chicken that had the avian flu. This is the nightmare scenario that people with respect to the current bird flue crisis. It is estimated the the Spanish "Bird flu" infected 20% of the population (in the US 28%) and killed 2.5-5% of the world's total population with some entire towns being wiped out.

    1. Re:1918 Flu Epidemic caused by bird flu mutating by kt0157 · · Score: 1

      I had a little bird
      It's name was Enza
      I opened the window
      And in flew Enza

      A kids nursery rhyme from 1918.

      K.

    2. Re:1918 Flu Epidemic caused by bird flu mutating by kt0157 · · Score: 1

      With "it's" spelt wrong. Ignoramus.

      K.

  39. 61 deaths world wide in 3 years by gelfling · · Score: 1

    uh oh it's gonna get MORLOCK.

    1. Re:61 deaths world wide in 3 years by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Small causes may have big consequences.

      Scenario 1:

      Careless hiker throws away smouldering cigarette butt in tinder dry forest.
      Time passes.
      News at eleven: Large forest fire burning out of control.

      Scenario 2:

      Careless hiker throws away smouldering cigarette butt in tinder dry forest.
      Bird watcher with pair of strong mag binoculars happens to see careless hiker throwing away smouldering cigarette butt.Bird watcher alerts Rangers who immediately call in firemen and try their best to put out the fire.

      Spot the difference.
      2 scenarios with same initial conditions. Small detail noticed before things get out of hand. Appropriate action taken.

      'Nuff said.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  40. Yes, and it will be coming to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your nearest Linux desktop next...

    **ducks**

  41. News for nerds? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sure, the Bird Flu is horrible and all, but when I want news on it, I watch the local TV news or read the newspaper. It might be "stuff that matters, but how is it "news for nerds"?

    1. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is it "news for nerds"?

      Well, "News for Birds" perhaps?

    2. Re:News for nerds? by gronofer · · Score: 1

      It's a rare example of a nerdish story of interest to the general population.

    3. Re:News for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds will die just as easily as anybody else in the unlikely event that this virus mutates into a communicable form.

  42. Re: I call bullshit by pete19 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Avian flu is dangerous because people get if from eating livestock and then spread it to other people.

    From the BBC Health website: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3422839.stm

    Q: Can I continue to eat chicken?
    Yes. Experts say avian flu is not a food-borne virus, so eating chicken is safe. The only people thought to be at risk are those involved in the slaughter and preparation of meat that may be infected. However the World Health Organisation recommends to be absolutely safe, all meat should be cooked to a temperature of at least 70C. Eggs should also be thoroughly cooked. Professor Hugh Pennington of Aberdeen University underlined the negligible risk to consumers: "The virus is carried in the chicken's gut. "A person would have to dry out the chicken meat and would have to sniff the carcass to be at any risk. But even then, it would be very hard to become infected."
    --
    There is nothing more practical than a good abstract theory.
  43. migration by pcp_ip · · Score: 1
    dead ducks are showing up on the shores of lake ontario. it's migrating this way too:

    http://www.studio2f.com/misc/2005/10/13dead_ducks_ bird_flu.php

  44. Nope by CiXeL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "No human cases of bird flu have been linked to eating poultry"
    http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/library/DS/00566.html

    In regards to madcow though I would like to state that my whole family stopped eating beef since the first suspicions regarding the illness in cattle in this country. My grandmother's sister Caberia Hind died at St. John's hospital in Santa Monica, California and was never counted in the official statistics regarding variant-cjd despite that being the diagnosis that came back after they shipped her head to the CDC for analysis. I am not making this up. This occurred in the mid 90s.

    They claimed she had acquired it from her europe trips where she traveled frequently. If i recall correctly they CLAIM the only person to die in the united states acquired it overseas and died in florida. To this day we're still seeking an answer as to why she was never counted in the official record.

    My family after seeing the horrible death Caberia went through decided they were better off without the risk of eating beef.

  45. It is a concern by dodo_dodo · · Score: 2, Informative

    People should be concerned and governments should be taking actions. And people in US should be concerned their government is lagging in preparation. Let me give some facts. The flu from 1918 (the Spanish Influenza) had a mortality rate b/w 2.5% and 5%. It killed over 20 mil people and virtually all people on earth had had it at one point. It circled the globe in less than 6 months. Thats in 1918. It is determined that it was an avian flu strain as well. All the flu viruses that we get each year are thought to be a variant of the spanish Influenza virus, to which we have some immunity and therefore the body's immune system reacts faster. The H5N1 (avian flu) has a mortality rate of over 50% so far! I dont know if you realize what that means. 50% combined with the way flu viruses spread. In a matter of 3-4 weeks we could have a third of the US population getting sick with half of that third dying! You do the math. And the hospitals and the medicine stockpiles will last you for about nothing. The vaccine being developed for it is promissing but there is no guarantee it will work on the strain that will cause the pandemic. Here is a twist. To mass-produce a flu vaccine, companies use chicken eggs. But its an avian flu and kills chickens. So that doesnt go smoothly. Other methods of producing vacines are years away and still in research. There are 2 drugs that can help you fight it - Tamiflu and Relenza. Latest reports are that H1N5 is showing resitence to Tamiflu. In Japan, where Tamiflu is wildly used for fighting regular flu, reistence rate is also high and raising. Government estimates we have enough stockpiles of Tamiflu to threat only 2 million people with another 800k on the way and 2.5 on order. You want more bad news? They all work fine and dandy if you are already taking them as preventive measure *before* you get sick. If you get sick and start taking them, their effectiveness drops becuase the multiplication rate of the virus is so high (Tamiflu works by blocking a key protein of the virus (neuraminidase) which is involved in the spreading of the virus).

    1. Re:It is a concern by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it mutates the mortality rate will not be 50%. Maybe more... Maybe less... Usually less...

  46. not a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice all the denigrating commentary and the idea this is some sort of joke or minor thing.

    This isn't a joke.

    Everyone reading this is going to eventually be profoundly affected by it, physically and/or economically.

    Especially those in the packed cities once it mutates to be human to human transmissible.

    Have fun!

  47. Hardly news by FishandChips · · Score: 1

    This news has been around for a few days now. And the chances are that if the H5N1 virus has only just been detected in Romania and Turkey then it's been around for a while and can be expected to have spread much more widely than that already. It's just that no one has yet noticed it. Well they'll starting looking now.

    More worrying news is that if the virus mutates into a killer flu, then there are real doubts as to whether the only and standard-issue anti-viral drug (Tamiflu) will actually prove effective. In addition, even modest stockpiles are not expected to be available in some places till 2006 at the earliest.

    Culling the vast majority of poultry (90 per cent or more) in Europe may be an idea, though governments are so in thrall to farming lobbies this will likely never happen. Considering the conditions in which most birds are kept and the disgusting products they are turned into (chicken McNuggetts, etc.) this would hardly be a great loss.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
    1. Re:Hardly news by Cili · · Score: 1

      Most 'farmers' in Eastern Europe are peasants, farming the land and growing animals for themselves. The avian meat one can buy at a supermarket or in Mcdonalds products etc. comes from big farms, where they keep the animals indoors all the time, in a industrial fashion.

      There are no 'farming lobbies'. It's about foot that a great numnber of people depend on in a pretty high percentage.

  48. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Wonderkid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    the first line of your reply does more to indicate YOU are an idiot than I am. I posted an interesting point, I did not insult. I am willing to bet you are a person with significantly greater technical knowledge than social ability and it is people like you that (continously) dumb down Slash Dot which is why it is not taken at all seriously by those in the professional industry.

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  49. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What a dickhead. And what other dickhead moderated this up?

    First off, the scenarios you see on the news are NOT the most doom-laden. They are the most 'don't worry the plebs'. Nobody is quite sure what will happen because everything is probabilistic. Spanish flu killed 50m when the global population was 1.8bn and travel was much more constrained.

    More realistic numbers are 750,000 dead in the UK, several million in the US, and 200 million worldwide. Don't forget, in its existing form its 55% lethal. Couple that with you being badly wrong, it kills the middle aged disproportionately - those that keep the systems of civilisation working.

    WHEN this hits, unless we are very lucky, it will fundamentally alter the balances in the world society. Fuck terrorists, this is the only thing that really matters at the moment - and fools like you keep claiming there is no need to prepare, everything is OK. Well I suppose its to be expected, there have always been those that can't handle reality and lawyers are always were the biggest bunch of fact-warping liars around.

  50. They're not on their "high horses". by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The poultry farmers aren't just motivated by money. Poultry to them, especially in some of these poorer nations, is what provides them their ability to live.

    I don't think you would like it much if your nation's government came along, proceeding to confiscate and destroy your computers, even those running Linux or OS X, to prevent the spread of a computer worm. Now remember, you most likely could get by without your computers, unlike many of the poultry farmers.

    Perhaps the richer countries should purchase these birds at market prices, and then proceed to destroy them. It gives the farmers incentive to get rid of the birds, and helps ensure a greater number are destroyed. It costs a bit of money, but probably far less than if the flu were to spread.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      They are concealing their potentially-infected poultry from those who are trying to control a potential pandemic. Obviously, there's something not in-tune with them.

      It's also rather absurd of you to compare a relatively, mildly bothersome computer worm, to a virus pandemic with a death toll that could number in the millions. If I had reason to believe that my computer had that power, I'd microwave the motherboard myself.

      I have a much better idea. How about, the farmers hand over the chickens...and people don't die from it? Sounds much better and easier to me.

    2. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about you fork over YOUR money so that the farmers are compensated for the chickens? Easy to dump others' livelyhood, eh?! Jackass.

    3. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by kv9 · · Score: 1

      the `farmers' how you call them (peasants really) get reimbursed for the destroyed birds. the only problem is that the idiots, instead of helping, stash the critters in various places.

    4. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by Armadni+General · · Score: 1

      Please tell me, exactly why should I compensate farmers in another nation because they have experienced failure that they knew, in their line of work, was possible? You really are quite the true "World Revolution" Communist, aren't you? Go back to Belarus.

    5. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Please tell me, exactly why should I compensate farmers in another nation because they have experienced failure that they knew, in their line of work, was possible?

      Assumption: Lack of consumption means failure of the business and bankcruptcy for a lot of these people.

      Not compensating will result in damage to an already poor economy through failure of internal business, increased dependence on imported food, elimination of distinctive breeding strains that must be replaced with genetically homogenous breeds, sometimes licenced from multinationals. Resulting damage to economy results in less stability, more extreme government, less ability to trade with other nations and purchase foreign goods (physical and information and media), increased hostility to nations that sat back and let them suffer. All of these are negatives for you assuming you are representing the USA, here.

      Compensating will result in a more productive economy resulting in a better trading partner, more stability, less extreme government. Relations between the donor and recipient nation will recieve a positive boost. All of these are positives. The negative cost of compensation is likely to be pretty darn small. If a nation can spend over $400,000,000,000 on its military for example, then $1,000,000 seems like it wont make a perceptible dent in your pay packet.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    6. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Also, the surety of compensation encourages these farmers to own up to outbreaks on their farms. This is a very big positive when failure to do so could result in a pandemic that could kill millions, including loved ones of your own.

      To paraphrase, Donne, no country is an island.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    7. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going (not to Belarus, but close enough).

      Btw, farmers on "high horse?" In what country are farmers/peasants on "high horse?" These folks in Romania and Turkey are not industrialized pork/poultry producers, you know.

    8. Re:They're not on their "high horses". by Armadni+General · · Score: 1

      Well, it's really a figure of speech...was rushing, had to get near the top, y'know? They need to not put profits ahead of safety...in this manner, at least. Everyone usually puts profit ahead of safety.

      Unrelated, where exactly are you going?

  51. Re:Don't Panic ( not yet anyway... ) by Macka · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Unless you are a poultry worker or otherwise handle wild fowl you are not at risk. This disease is spread bird to man but not man to man.

    Not yet. But what's keeping the scientists and politicians across Europe awake at night is the possibility that someone already infected with human influenza will contract H5N1 and it will mutate. The message we're getting from the scientific community over here in Europe is that it's not a case of if, but when. Its being taken so seriously that here in the UK plans are already being explored by Government on what to do when the first cases of human to human transmitted H5N1 arrives. Depending on how fast the virus spreads and how fast we do or don't react to it, the death toll could be anywhere between 50,000 to 750,000 people. Here's another BBC Article on the subject, published just today !!

  52. Other news... by dud83 · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the obviously-ancient-topnews section;

    Bush gets reelected as President for his second term!
    Giant-Tsunami hits the Pacific Ocean!
    Time Warner aquires AOL Online!

    1. Re:Other news... by imr · · Score: 1

      No way?

  53. information by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    now all they need to do is fork the DNS and split the internet, that way there will be a quick and free flow of information. Keeping people informaed is the only way to pervent disaster

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  54. from a local by iLogiK · · Score: 2, Informative

    okay...well i live in romania (the north-eastern part, so nowhere near the infected areas)
    this is in now way news...it's been on the local news for the past days (weeks even)...i've also seen a few reports about it on cnn...
    the locals aren't trying to protect their birds...they don't want to risk it. the gouverment has promised to pay for the birds which are being killed.

    1. Re:from a local by kv9 · · Score: 1

      the locals aren't trying to protect their birds...

      yes you are correct. they are only playing hide and seek with them.
    2. Re:from a local by b374 · · Score: 0
      the locals aren't trying to protect their birds...

      yes you are correct. they are only playing hide and seek with them.


      more like "hide and SICK"?
  55. Use the classic remedy! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a job for a hot bowl of chicken soup and- oh, wait a minute...

    1. Re:Use the classic remedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may have inadvertently stumbled onto something. Chicken soup HAS been found to help with colds for some unknown reason: perhaps the presence of some avian cold virus provides a natural vaccination?

      As for avian flu, it's probably already spread worldwide since the first outbreaks (birds migrate long distances every year). Since it apparently is killing a lot of birds (but not in all cases?), hopefully when it does mutate it will lose some lethality.

  56. Preventitive Methods by Charles+E.+Hardwidge · · Score: 1

    The best way of avoiding Asian Flu is to maintain a regular pattern, getting plenty of sleep, eating well, and taking part in moderate exercise. Good personal hygiene will reduce the risk of but not necessarily prevent contagion. The virus has a high chance of being fatal if your immune system is weak, as may be the case with the very young, old, or physically weak.

    I guess Slashdot is going to see a sudden drop in readership REAL SOON NOW(TM).
    1. Re:Preventitive Methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're incorrect. While traditional variants of the flu show peaks in mortality among the very young, the very old, and those with comprimised immune systems, the H5N1 pandemic in 1918 showed a remarkable difference. Instead of killing those at their weakest, its peak was among the healthiest of those infected. Adults of median age and normal health were as susceptible as any other member of the population. So should a new H5N1 outbreak occur, the fact that you are young and healthy should not provide you with much security.

  57. It kills those with healthy immune systems. by jasonhamilton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your body attacks it, your lungs fill with liquid and you die. Those who are very young, old, or with unhealthy immune systems will survive it. The 55% mortality rate is acros those who've gotten it so far. The mortality rate of a healthy person is around 80%.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  58. Media Hype-fest by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Remember all those stories last year during the vaccine shortage that had all those geezers in long lines? How did that hype-fest turn out?

    Or how about SARS...which was a lot of hype over nothing?
    Or West Nile..which was hyped up, but barely killed anyone?
    Or Dan Rather's documents about Bush that turned out to be fake?
    Or the reported rapes and murders that supposedly happened in New Orleans, which turned out to be false?
    Or the news reports that said there could be 60,000 people dead after Katrina...and it turned out to be about 1200?
    Or the deadly/toxic water in New Orleans that turned out to be not much more harmful than their rain run-off?

    And that's just recent stuff that I can think of off the top of my head.

    So excuse me if I don't seem too concerned about this whole avian flu thing.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    1. Re:Media Hype-fest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The USA likes it like that. The media spreads fear and sensationalism. Anything not extreme just isn't interesting to them it seems. Guns kill well over 10 thousand people in the USA, but nobody really seems to care. And people don't hesitate to use them (statistics seem to show that at least).

      Why worry about the number of people that die because of (directly or indirectly) guns, poverty, pollution and such things, when you can just sell more guns and go to war over nothing (causing much more deaths).

      This'll get modded down by Americans - no doubt about it - just because it's the truth.

    2. Re:Media Hype-fest by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Not to mention how real threats get almost no news time. SARS killed 800 people, 800. Now compare that to the number of car crash fatalities in the US last year(and for many years before that): roughly 40,000. 50 times the number of people worldwide that died from SARS. 13 times the number of people that died in September 11th. How much news coverage do car crashes get in the national media? Very little, in fact usually its only mentioned when a particularly bad crash happens or when the NTSB releases their annual numbers, and even then it's more of a blurb(oh yeah, 40,000 people died last year in car crashes, now lets get back to today's scare tactic)

    3. Re:Media Hype-fest by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So excuse me if I don't seem too concerned about this whole avian flu thing.

      I'll tell you why this concerns me. For the last couple of weeks we have been hearing bird flu everywhere, then Bush announces that if the flu hit the US he will use the military to keep order. They see their power slipping, this could just be the ace in the hole to retain power and finally transform us into the facist state they have been laying the groundwork for for years.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    4. Re:Media Hype-fest by justins · · Score: 1
      Now compare that to the number of car crash fatalities in the US last year

      Why?

      How is that a useful comparison at all?

      You see this so much, when you are talking about so many different things. War casualties: "well sure 1200 died last year, but look at all the car accidents."

      There's no reason here, it's just "well, that's a lot of human tradgedy, but look at how much worse it is on the roads!!!" Stupid nonsense which doesn't make any point at all.

      How much news coverage do car crashes get in the national media?

      If you read in the appropriate venue, car magazines or web pages, they get plenty of coverage.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    5. Re:Media Hype-fest by Znork · · Score: 1

      The usefulness of the comparison is, of course, to allow the reader to form a rational basis for the amount of risk, and thus form a rational opinion on what kind of response is appropriate.

      If you're not afraid to go out in traffic every day, you have no particular reason to hold a larger amount of irrational fear for something less likely to kill you, nor should politicians or media be spending more time and resources on such things.

    6. Re:Media Hype-fest by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      How is my comment flamebait? I posted an honest concern of mine. I thought flamebait was when someone was trying to consciously provoke a hostile reaction not just having a different opinion.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    7. Re:Media Hype-fest by Cili · · Score: 1

      40.000 people a year from car accidents is nothing. Think about the millions that die every year of OLD AGE !!!!11!. That doesn't get enough media coverage either.

    8. Re:Media Hype-fest by dr_light · · Score: 1
      You were right. It did get modded down. Heh. And it's not just the media companies that make it a big event.
      Remember all those stories last year during the vaccine shortage that had all those geezers in long lines? How did that hype-fest turn out?
      Living in Romania, I can tell you the paranoia is spreading again. And the pharmaceutical companies are laughing all the way to the bank.
    9. Re:Media Hype-fest by justins · · Score: 1
      The usefulness of the comparison is, of course, to allow the reader to form a rational basis for the amount of risk, and thus form a rational opinion on what kind of response is appropriate.

      Which it does not do in the slightest. There's a fallacy or two here I'll try to explain.

      If you're not afraid to go out in traffic every day, you have no particular reason to hold a larger amount of irrational fear for something less likely to kill you

      First, it's not an irrational fear. Second, a person does well to "fear" all the things that are likely to kill them, barring some situation like combat where there are so many threats that some must be discarded. It's a useful survival trait.

      The notion you're advancing that the amount of "fear" (which isn't necessarily emotional fear at all but the dedication of thought and resources to dealing with a potential threat) we ought to allocate to a given theat ought to be proportional to the amount of perceived risk is not well thought out.

      For us personally in our daily lives, dealing with a given threat will often entail making a single decision regardless of the seriousness of the threat. So there isn't going to be any scaling between the seriousness of the threat and the amount of resources needed to cope. It's just decision making.

      For a society or government things get more complicated since we have so much trouble even quantifying risk associated with large groups. But with something like a pandemic we aren't talking about the same sort of risk as traffic accidents. With one sort of risk discussion will focus on incremental improvements to automobile safety, traffic patterns, and usage habits. The other sort of risk is something of a singularity: if the virus mutates the wrong way, a lot of people will get very sick and it'd be nice if we had some kind of way to treat them. You need to reduce the liklihood of it happening and prepare for if/when it does, drawing from a resource pool that frankly isn't zero-sum anyhow. A pat comparison in numbers between the two situations is really just nonsense.

      And it happens so often. "So and so many people died on the streets last year, don't worry about the mere hundreds we're losing in Iraq." No reasoning, just a strange form of madness.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  59. Re:Actually... it has seen Human-Human transmissio by elleomea · · Score: 1

    Ah, sorry my mistake.

  60. Stop being non-alarmist. You're helping no one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm seeing a lot of people trying to spread calm in this thread by assuring everyone that it isn't so bad. You'll have to excuse me if I listen to groups like the World Health Organization over some random guy on Slashdot. The WHO has quoted death tolls anywhere between 7 million and 100 million worldwide, depending on the lethality of the strain when (not if, but when) it mutates.

    The virus HAS spread person to person in a few instances, despite what people on here are saying. However it has not mutated to a form that can be EASILY transmitted from person to person. Most of the experts agree that this will happen, although they also acknowledge that the strain probably won't be as lethal when it mutates, which is good. It currently has around a 50% mortality rate, whereas the great Spanish Flu pandemic that killed so many people earlier this century only had around a 5% mortality rate.

    Think I'm being alarmist? Here's what one acknowledged expert in the field says: "In our lifetime, we have not seen a disease sweep through a community and people die so fast that there's no one to take care of them at the hospital and there's no one to bury them," says Dr. Greg Poland, chief of the Mayo Vaccine Research Group at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Minnesota. "That's what will happen in a pandemic. It would be more deaths than all the world's wars in all of human history. All within the space of six to 18 months."

    Flu pandemics happen all the time. Around every 30 years or so on average, and we're due for the next one. The current flu virus out there is one we are very vulnerable to, so naturally scientists are concerned (I've been following New Scientist coverage of the bird flu for the past year and a half or so, this isn't something new).

    Panicking won't do any good. Neither will assuring yourself that everything will be just fine and that God will protect you. The reality is likely to be somewhere halfway between the best case scenario and the worst case scenario. If the virus mutates (as experts seem fairly certain it will), chances are someone you know and love may die from it.

    1. Re:Stop being non-alarmist. You're helping no one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since scientists understand so little about diseases, especially viral ones, and seem completely out of ideas when it comes to battling them (if it cannot be treated with antibiotics you are shit out of luck), what makes you think following the WHO is actually going to help anyone?

      Given our limited knowledge, one could even hypothesize that ALL flu pandemics where caused by avain flu strain mutating into human strains: this explains how they spread globably so quickly even when modern travel was not around. This has most likely already happened and will happen again.

      In fact, you could have caught it already since the first human case was in 1997 and the birds migrate every year worldwide. Could it already be the flu people are catching and it isn't rasing death rates significantly? Possible, although it is more likely to be atypically lethal and virulent (doom and gloom). All I know is that right around the time of SARS I started to feel sick...

      There is nothing significantly different about avian or human pysiology which would contradict this scenario: if it happen previously it will eventually recur (which is what has been proven with the 1918 strain).

      "If the virus mutates (as experts seem fairly certain it will), chances are someone you know and love may die from it."

      The chances are still better that you will know someone who will die in a car accident. Why don't you just tell us to curl up in a ball and cry?

  61. Let's play a game of.... total dumbass! by msormune · · Score: 1

    Quick! Everyone who has a habit of smoking: After reading this Slashdot article, when you are worrying that you might catch this disease, go for a relaxing smoke.

    1. Re:Let's play a game of.... total dumbass! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Er, if it's anything like the 1918 pandemic, smokers will be at lower risk (I think) than everyone else of dying, as their immune systems are already somewhat depressed. The 1918 flu killed mainly people in the peak of their immune fitness, 16-38.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  62. You call that deadly? by Flambergius · · Score: 1

    Let's see ... still not able to transfer between human. BORING!!! Please wake my up when it mutates into something real.

    --Flam

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
  63. Faith the Fear by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you reading the Japanese edition of "the" bible, where it says "tsunami"? Or are you just falling for the fortuneteller's fallacy, where open-ended descriptions of vaguely specified bad events are credited with "prediction" when they inevitably occur? It's certainly not the part of a bible where god comes back to save us - they always hold off on that one until after we give all our money and power to the priests. Let's not give away the farm to the oldest scam in the book, literally (puns intended).

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Faith the Fear by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Moderation 0
          50% Troll
          50% Insightful

      I think the preachers must have started to program their zombie army to TrollMod Slashdot, because the only "predictable response" my post could have been designed to elicit would be TrollMods leaping for their consoles to succor their invisible voices. TrollMod, get thee behind me!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  64. Time for speculation by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    in poultry futures...

  65. Take It Easy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Ah, lethal bird flu arrives just in time for Winter, when people shut ourselves together in close quarters, where flu is multiplied. Best take all our vitamins, especially vitamins C (1-4g:day) and A and zinc, which boost our immune responses. Chicken soup helps stay hydrated and electrolyzed, and reduces the stress which lowers our immunity. The more relaxed and well fed are the least vulnerable to disease. And button up when you go outside!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Take It Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " Chicken soup helps..."


      Emphasis added, dumbass.

    2. Re:Take It Easy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      #1: Chickens don't get this flu
      #2: Soup kills the virus
      #3: You're an asshole

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Take It Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Chickens don't get this flu"


      From the summary:

      "Several ducks and chickens have died... it has been confirmed."


      Emphasis added, dumbass.

    4. Re:Take It Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      1 to 4 grams of vitamin C is probably not good for you, and some people consider these levels even toxic. These levels are already hundreds to thousands of percent above RDA, anyway. Just eat a piece of fruit or something and relax.

    5. Re:Take It Easy by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't know who considers 1-4g:day of C toxic. The point of massive doses of C is to saturate the body. "Thousands of percent" just means 10s-times, and the RDA is the minimum as recommended by the FDA, which doesn't subscribe to the massive dose model - but does subscribe to the pharmaco bribery model. If you want to get sick, and maybe get treatment, strictly follow the FDA. If you want to prevent sickness, do your own research.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  66. What hype? Happens all the time. by tehanu · · Score: 4, Informative

    This exchange of genetic material between viruses is known as the "antigenic shift" and is believed to be the cause of influenza pandemics such as the 1918 Spanish Flu:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigenic_shift

    "Antigenic shift is the process by which two different strains of influenza combine to form a new subtype having a mixture of the surface antigens of the two original strains. The term antigenic shift is specific to the influenza literature; in other viral systems, the same process is called reassortment or viral shift.

    Antigenic shift is contrasted with antigenic drift, which is the natural mutation over time of known strains of influenza (or other things, in a more general sense) to evade the immune system. Antigenic drift occurs in all types of influenza including influenza A, B and C. Antigenic shift, however, occurs only in influenza A because it infects more than just humans. Affected species include other mammals and birds, giving influenza A the opportunity for a major reorganization of surface antigens. Influenza B and C only infect humans, minimizing the chance to mutate drastically.

    Flu strains are named after their types of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase surface proteins, so they will be called, for example, H3N2 for type-3 hemagglutinin and type-2 neuraminidase. If two different strains of influenza infect the same cell simultaneously, their protein capsids and lipid envelopes are removed, exposing their RNA, which is then transcribed to DNA. The host cell then forms new viruses that combine antigens; for example, H3N2 and H5N1 can form H5N2 this way. Because the human immune system has difficulty recognizing the new influenza strain, it may be highly dangerous. Such combinations caused, for instance, the infamous Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918 which killed 40 million people worldwide. Influenza virus which have undergone antigenic shift have also gone on to cause the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957, the Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968, and the Swine Flu scare of 1976."

  67. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    My good sir, that was exactly what I was looking for. Thanks.

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
  68. Spread Betting? by igb · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So far, it's killed of the order of 100 people with a target population of two billion (yep, billion). So two things occur to me. Firstly, if a tenth of the effort that appears to have gone into avian flu had gone into TB, Cholera, Typhoid and Malaria over the past few months, a lot more than a hundred people would have been saved. I won't even start on the numbers who died from AIDS because US Christians have a thing about condoms (which handily kills a lot of blacks: two bigotries for the price of one).

    However, given there's almost no evidence, and numbers like 50 thousand to 1 million in the UK alone are being bandied around, I wonder what Ladbrokes would take on spread bets? My prediction: based on the BSE ``scientists talk nonsense to secure research funding'' debacle, the actual deaths will be about 1% of the lowest estimate.

    ian

    1. Re:Spread Betting? by justins · · Score: 1
      So far, it's killed of the order of 100 people

      We don't know with any certainty how many have died, China has a pretty poor track record when it comes to opening up about these things. Plenty of other places just aren't set up to accurately record much of anything.

      Firstly, if a tenth of the effort that appears to have gone into avian flu

      Effort which you haven't even attempted to quantify, but which pretty much all the experts agree is not enough.

      However, given there's almost no evidence,

      Evidence of what? We know it kills birds nice and quickly. We know that humans can catch it. The only question is if and when it will mutate to a form which is spread easily between humans.

      You know, if that eventually does not happen, it's not a cause for celebration for all the dumb wankers like you who go around whining about alarmism and how the money could better be spent on whatever. It just means that the preventative measures which you scorn actually did their work.

      the actual deaths will be about 1% of the lowest estimate

      The actual deaths resulting from what? Mutated H5N1? Or just the flu in general? Because the number of deaths from influenza itself are already above 1% of the lowball estimate. It kills a lot of people even when it's not particularly nasty.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    2. Re:Spread Betting? by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      My prediction: based on the BSE ``scientists talk nonsense to secure research funding'' debacle, the actual deaths will be about 1% of the lowest estimate.

      Perhaps deaths will be 1% of the lowest estimate because people deal with the problem, having been motivated by large death estimates based on what may happen if they do nothing.

    3. Re:Spread Betting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate christians?

    4. Re:Spread Betting? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Wait, what does a Christian's perspective on condoms have to do with the willingness of blacks/homosexuals to commit sodomy (either with or without a condom)? If they don't, that's their own fault, and has not a fucking thing in the world to do with Christians anywhere.

      Not only that, but an influenza epidemic (er, pandemic) has much, much more potential to do damage than any of the other things you mentioned. The key word here is "potential", and that's exactly what is trying to be avoided by the active combat being done against this flu strain. AIDS is on a decline throughout the world (well, except in Africa). TB, Cholera, Typhoid and Malaria are diseases that are well known and have become mostly stabilized throughout the world, but are still receiving large amounts of attention (Malaria is still a very real problem, for the most part). We're simply playing catch-up with this flu variant which is potentially an extinction-level event for humanity. If it jumps the race barrier, there's really little we'd be able to do to keep our societies integral, what with half the world's populations dying in a matter of weeks.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    5. Re:Spread Betting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wait, what does a Christian's perspective on condoms have to do with the willingness of blacks/homosexuals to commit sodomy (either with or without a condom)?"

      Wait, what does a Christian's perspective on condoms have to do with the willingness of white people to pour shit on black people whenever they can for whatever random reason they can find?

      What statistic have you seen that shows that BLACK people are more likely to engage in sodomy? You should know that AIDS, originally a disease afflicting WHITE homosexuals in North America, is now affecting blacks and latinos disproprtionaly to their population size in the USA. Poverty and higher incarceration rates (and of course an increase in forced and consentual sodomy) cannot fully explain this. A genetic susecptibility of BLACKS to certains AIDs strains was suggested, but how does it explain the higher rates for latinos as well?

      More likely because white, red-necked bastards intentionally inflicted AIDs on poor black people based on their irrational and stupid hatred of people for not looking like them. After all thats why "Christians" in the USA tolerate abortion: it keeps "them" to a lower number (at one point blacks far outnumbered whites in the southern states, don't you wonder how they are no a minority in those same states?)

      "AIDS is on a decline throughout the world (well, except in Africa)."

      Yes, and according to information I have read on the AIDs pandemic in Africa, it is primarily afflicting hetereosexuals with men vectoring the disease among many female partners. Given that engaging in sodomy in Africa is a great way to risk being beaten to death by a mob, I doubt that black people's "tendency to engage in sodomy" is at the cause of this epidemic, but I am sure you have all the statistics.

      Why don't you tell us about the tendency of some whites to assume they are entitled to some special dispensation and to convince themselves that their own shit smells like roses?

    6. Re:Spread Betting? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      So far, it's killed of the order of 100 people with a target population of two billion (yep, billion). So two things occur to me. Firstly, if a tenth of the effort that appears to have gone into avian flu had gone into TB, Cholera, Typhoid and Malaria over the past few months, a lot more than a hundred people would have been saved.
      Care to provide proof of that?

      Consider this; billions of dollars and man hours *have* been spent on those four diseases over the past century. Fighting them is a current and ongoing process - how will a few drops change the level in an already large budget. Consider also that none of those four are likely to flash into a large scale epidemic or pandemic.

      I won't even start on the numbers who died from AIDS because US Christians have a thing about condoms (which handily kills a lot of blacks: two bigotries for the price of one).
      Of course you won't start - there's nothing to start *from*. Condoms are not illegal - and in the western world are widely and freely available. In the African nations their goverments are quite able to purchase and distribute them if they wish. The bigot is you.
      However, given there's almost no evidence, and numbers like 50 thousand to 1 million in the UK alone are being bandied around,
      No evidence? Have you had your head buried in the sand?
      I wonder what Ladbrokes would take on spread bets? My prediction: based on the BSE ``scientists talk nonsense to secure research funding'' debacle, the actual deaths will be about 1% of the lowest estimate.
      I bet you are one of those people who claim that since there was no widespread Y2k problems - that's proof that all the work done to prevent them was not needed.
    7. Re:Spread Betting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "US Christians have a thing about condoms (which handily kills a lot of blacks: two bigotries for the price of one)."

      Out of whose ass did you pull that? That comment is so absurd I dont even know how to respond to it.
      Do you actually beleive "US Christians" sit around and plot on how to ban condoms and to kill black people?

      WTF? What planet are you on?
      Slashdot gets more bizzare by the day.

  69. World Health Org FAQ by edibleplastic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is a very comprehensive FAQ that the WHO has published. To all those who posters who are questioning the severity of the threat: the FAQ indicates that 2 of the 3 necessary prerequisites for the flu becoming a pandemic have been met.

    http://www.who.int/entity/csr/disease/avian_influe nza/avian_faqs/en/index.html

  70. Has anyone but me noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that the bird flu outbreaks seem to occur in locales where ICANN holds its policy meetings?

  71. Re:Uh oh.. women's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like how women have about 0 rights in the Bible :). Yet the churches are pro-women's rights and women are angels according to them. The churches are faggly. The Bible is down with you have bunches of obedient slavelike wives.

  72. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the article on the front page of the BBC News. 50,000 deaths is a low guesstimate. Figures up to 750,000 have been mentioned. That's about 1/70 of the population. Worldwide, figures between 5 and 75 million deaths have been quoted. Since 1997 this has been tracked and monitored. With a 50% death incident rate in the cases in the Far East this is a very real threat.

  73. Not a big fan of hunting, but... by benhocking · · Score: 1

    I'm not a big fan of hunting myself, but it sounds like your logic would also apply to keeping people out of nature altogether. While we're at it should we shut down the Appalachian trail, close down swimming holes, etc.?

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Not a big fan of hunting, but... by curious.corn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, but hunting birds involves handling bleeding carcasses, taking them home, cleaning the guts in a residential area (perhaps tossing them in the garbage causing further dissemination)... Now, the virus may be destroyed by cooking, but the three steps preceding that clearly put many people in the hunter's proximity at risk of viral contamination.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    2. Re:Not a big fan of hunting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you whore.

      Death To women's Rights

  74. Google on "plague aids immunity caucasian" by benhocking · · Score: 2, Informative

    It led me to this page as well as to a rather unfortunate article from the KKK.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  75. EDITORS by WindBourne · · Score: 1
    Maybe I'm ignorant, but since when do viruses (virii) exchange genetic material? Please cite some kind of real world example of this actually happening...I'm really curious. Otherwise, stop the hype.

    I am curious. Why is your ignorance and laziness to do a little of research a reason for accusing somebody of hype? This concept is something that I was taught in 6'th grade science (and that was in the 60's), so I would think that even today 6'th graders get it. This is just simple genetics. But more importantly, Google is available to you. Why not just google for 2 minutes before talking and insulting? others?

    Editors, please consider the idea of putting a negative for plain nastiness. We seem to have lost the ability to conduct civil discussions here. If nothing else, look at ~ifwm as a good example of what is not needed.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:EDITORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This concept is something that I was taught in 6'th grade science (and that was in the 60's), so I would think that even today 6'th graders get it.

      You'd think so wouldn't you. But, these days schools are more interested in being politically correct than in encouraging independent thought which might result in non-politically correct thinking. As long as the kids can do "acceptably" well on standardized tests (based mostly on memorization as opposed to independent thought) everyone seems happy enough.

      Thank your luck that you were in the school system in the 60's when an educated workforce (primarily science and engineering) was seen as necessary to avoid eventual subjugation by the Soviet Union.

      These days, with the Soviet Union no longer a threat and with globalization the current management paradigm, we don't worry about dumbing down the workforce since you can always hire the appropriate workforce overseas.

    2. Re:EDITORS by RingDev · · Score: 1

      I would say the parent has the right to demand a source. Its a pretty given standard that the person stating a fact is responsible for proving and defending it, while the person recieving the fact is responsibly for looking at it objectivly and questioning it. True, he was a bit blunt, but his response was acceptable. -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:EDITORS by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I don't think the parent deserved a flamebait mod. Viruses don't mate with each other. Unless you know about how they can exchange genetic material through the medium of infecting a common cell, then 'interbreeding' of viruses does seem implausible. And I think awareness of how this can happen is not that common, so it's easy to see how the the poster could see it as someone creating hype.

      And as a result of his demand for backing up the statement, we got a nice, clear explanation of how it happens from another poster, which will probably educate many more people.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  76. Your ignorance is showing by benhocking · · Score: 1

    The story of Dracula was written by Bram Stoker, who was born in Dublin (that's in Ireland, btw) on November 8, 1847. Your insulting attitude towards Americans is completely uncalled for and most likely stems from a self-fulfilling prophecy - "That person just made a comment I think is ignorant, so he must be American, which just reinforces my belief that all Americans are ignorant." If you want to ignore my comment, feel free this time to use the fact that I am in fact just an American. :p

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Your ignorance is showing by lahvak · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the comment you are replying to, you quickly discover that first, he didn't imply in any way that the story of Count Dracula was written by an American, and, second, he never said that Americans are ignorant. He did talk about stupid American movie, which doesn't surprise me, the popular Count Dracula movie must seem pretty idiotic to a Romanian.

      BTW, Count Dracula was also the first story that associated vampires with bats. If you look at traditional European folklore (and actually any lore that has some sort of vampire characters in it), bats are never mentioned in connection with vampires.

      --
      AccountKiller
  77. Can someone explain to me by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    ...what makes a flu deadly? Obviously, most of us have been exposed to 'ordinary' influenza, and manage to come out with little more than a week or two of being miserable. I know these things are generally hard on the very young and the very old, but the humans that died of this Avian Flu were largely middle aged, right? Weren't some of them even in the hospital when they died? How does a flu cause that much trouble?

    1. Re:Can someone explain to me by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-cytokine-storm .htm
      http://www.time.com/time/asia/covers/501050926/his tory.html

      You get the flu, your body then reacts so much that you basically kill off your own lung tissues. Really nasty stuff.

      The 1918 flu killed alot of healthy people (18-40 year olds), not because their immune system was weak but because it was strong.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Can someone explain to me by Wastl · · Score: 1
      Most people actually do not die from the influenza itself, but rather from a superinfection with pneumonia. The reason is that influenza weakens the immune system (if you ever had it, you know how seriously it knocks you out) and hurts the lungs so much that it paves the way for a pneumonia infection. A healthy immune system would deal with this easily, but it is a serious problem for a weakend immune system. For this reason, you will usually also get antibiotics (that of course do not help against the virus) when you get the flu.

      Sebastian

    3. Re:Can someone explain to me by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      A third reason that some flus are deadlier than others is immune system preparedness.

      The immune system identifies and knocks off infecting agents (like viruses, etc) by markers called antigens on their surface. All flus are deadly, but usually the immune system can recognize the antigens of the virus, identify it as an intruder, and eliminate it through immune system response. This is the rationale behind the yearly flu vaccines -- the vaccine makers predict what the antigens will be on next year's big flu viruses, and create a vaccine specific to those antigens.

      Occasionally, a 'new' flu will evolve, that doesn't have antigens that people's immune systems have seen before. The immune response will be inadequate, and the virus will replicate unchecked, until it is too late. When the immune system finally identifies the virus as a pathogen, and acts to wipe it out, the response can cause sytem shock or other nasties.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  78. BINGO! by Teahouse · · Score: 1

    WHy aren't people noticing that this is still a "potential" pandemic. The only recorded spread so far from human to human resulted in a much weaker strain. I am not suggesting tking this lightly, but I think it's being pushed to the public WAY too much. This should remain a WHO and CDC issue. They should quietly prepare with just a little public information. The amount of media time being spent on a so-far harmless bird-only influenza strain is simply amazing.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
    1. Re:BINGO! by Flambergius · · Score: 1

      Well, the governments are stocking up with flu vaccins and other medicines, and rightfully so. That takes quite a bit of money, so there's a a public spending story sort of buried there ... but to that I say:

      Let's see, the government is spending tax money on medicine nobody will probably use. BORING!!! Wake me up when the revolution starts.

      Flam

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers - Pablo Picasso
  79. It's even worse than that... by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not only can't many of these farmers survive without their livestock, they probably can't be replaced. At best, they'll be replaced with the genetic freaks that are common in commercial agriculture in the industrialized world. At worst, most of the farmers will go out of business and be forced into cities and factories, to be replaced by a large agribusiness concern.

    So-called "heirloom" breeds, animals well-suited for small farms because of their survival instincts and ability to reproduce, are quickly becoming a thing of the past. And it's more than just economics that is the cause.

    The developed world is waging agricultural warfare on the developing world. One of the first targets in Iraq (accidentally of course) was a seed bank, containing thousands of species of irreplacabale genetic material, the lifeblood of agricultural progress and a threat to the manufactured livestock of agribusiness and rising biotech companies. Sadly, it wouldn't surprise me if the "bird flu" crisis were as manufactured as the reasons for the Iraq war.

    Of course, it's not that these unique agricultural products can't be re-discovered, with the help of big genetics corporations of course. But those corporations certainly won't recover a genetic trait or a unique species without a licensing agreement, and yearly fees. Thus, the small farm is destroyed, by hook or by crook, and its operators forced either into urban life or having their profits perpetually taxed away by agribusiness.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:It's even worse than that... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      One of the first targets in Iraq (accidentally of course) was a seed bank, containing thousands of species of irreplacabale genetic material

      I'm very interested in this. If you can provide more information or a good source, this would be extremely useful to me.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:It's even worse than that... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      +5 insightful for unsubstantiated super ultra wacky conspiracy theories on /.? Why I'm shocked I tell you, just shocked! not.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  80. one case only by garyrich · · Score: 1

    Hard to say anything from a single case. She may indeed have caught it the same way as her brother. I saw in another article that she hadn't started Tamiflu until after she was already ill, when it's not expected to work as well.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:one case only by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Hard to say anything from a single case. She may indeed have caught it the same way as her brother.

      Possibly. But, that's the problem: they weren't able to identify the vector.

      I saw in another article that she hadn't started Tamiflu until after she was already ill, when it's not expected to work as well.

      The original article that I quoted wasn't clear about it, but this one is:

      http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&si d=adU.gGtVZZ2g

      A sample from the patient was resistant to Tamiflu in a laboratory test. However, it wasn't resistant to Relenza:

      http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapac ific/view/173522/1/.html

      I'm not sure she was ever treated with either drug. Fortunately, the resistant strain of the virus apparently doesn't reproduce well. An article in Nature is supposed to be published next week. Hopefully, there will be more detail.

  81. Humanity is Dying by barfomar · · Score: 2, Funny
    It is official; the United Nations confirms: Humanity is dying.

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Human community when CDC confirmed that the Human population has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of its all time high, since the avian influenza pandemic. Coming on the heels of a recent UN survey which plainly states that Humanity has lost more population, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Humanity is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent United Nations comprehensive population count.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Humanity's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Humanity faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Humanity because Humanity is dying. Things are looking very bad for Humanity. As many of us are already aware, Humanity continues to lose. Blood flows like a river of red ink.

    First world populations are the most endangered of them all, having lost 98% of their population. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time World leaders Toni Blair and Vladimir Putin only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: Humanity is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    United States leader George Bush states that were about 6.5 billion humans on Earth. How many Humans are there? Let's see. Before the Pandemic the number of Humans versus Troll posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 6.5 billion/5 = 1.3 billion Trolls. Troll posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of Slashdots posts. Therefore there are about 2.6 billion Trolls on Slashdot. A recent count revealed 2 Troll posts for every Human post. Therefore there must now be (2.6 billion/5 = .5 billion) Humans left

    Due to the troubles of Washington, abysmal reproduction and so on, Humanity went out of business and was taken over by other primates who produce another troubled organism. Now Humanity is almost dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that Humanity has steadily declined in population share. Humanity is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Humanity is to survive at all it will be among organism dilettante dabblers. Humanity continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Humanity is dead.

    Fact: Humanity is dying

  82. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the truly interesting fact is that despite all our knowledge, the solution is still hampered by our economic models and by good old greed.

    Currently it doesn't even spread human-to-human so it's not all that dangerous. In order for it to become dangerous it will have to mutate. If it mutates then it may require a completely new vaccination. Why in the hell should we spend all that money right now to create possibly useless vaccines?

    Duh.

  83. Calm down, people... no need to worry by e40 · · Score: 1

    This is why you don't need to worry.

    1. Re:Calm down, people... no need to worry by Tale+Surovi · · Score: 1

      This text is missing the point. The H5N1 is no real threat by itself. The real threat is (as pointed out again and again) its "blending" with some regular strain of human flu. And there is no way to tell how deadly this new strain will be, nor how long it will incubate.

  84. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Influenza can actually mutate

    No problem. Influenza cannot enter the United States. Evolution is illegal here.

  85. Re:Uh oh.. women's rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you'd have actually read it, you'd see that if men did what they were supposed to do then women would have a considerable amount of power over a man and in the family in general. Not to mention all the women mentioned and praised in the bible for remarkable things they did. No where in the bible, however, have I ever read about women being angels, or vice-versa. Read the bible. All of it.

  86. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by RingDev · · Score: 1

    So what this means is that if the bird flu and another strain mutate in one cell, there are hundreds of possibilities. You could wind up with a dead virus, a weak virus, a slight modification of the other strain that the body already has a defence against, a new virus that the immune system can adapt to, a new virus that the body can not adapt to(worst case). Even then, factors involving the virus' survivability outside its host could change dramaticly. How communicable is a virus that can't survive in a temperature under 95 degrees?

    I think it's good to be prepaired for a worst case senerio, but in all reality, any two flu strains could merge and create a super flu at any given time, and any two flu strains could merge and die at any given time. So I really don't think its worth panicing, nor posting on SlashDot.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  87. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Influenza can actually mutate

    [sarcasm] No problem. Influenza doesn't evolve in the United States for those who believe in Intelligen Design.[/sarcasm]

  88. You got it wrong by andersh · · Score: 2

    You got it seriously wrong on that one - it's not the heads of state that dislike/hate Eastern Europe at all - it's the populace! People don't like the idea of cheap "Eastern" European labour undercutting their wages. The governments on the other hand love the idea of the economic turbulence they imagine is "development". Even worse the governments accept US/UK influence on the Turkish issue.

    The Central and Eastern European countries that joined the EU have always been central to European culture - it's only the last 50 years behind the Iron Curtain that stopped them. Personally I welcome them back into the fold as valued Europeans - unlike the Turkish hordes once again attempting to invade and conquer Europe. When, oh when, will they get it into their heads that they're Asians Most Europeans would take Romania/Bulgaria [into the EU] over Turkey any time! The EU is not only a trading block - we're a cultural union as well. That's why we cannot accept the "bridge between the Muslim and Western world"-argument. We're not in the business of developing Asia/the Middle-East/North Africa under the EU umbrella. Turkey should look to it's neighbours for economic success, I'm sure they'll do well (seriously).

    1. Re:You got it wrong by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I'm in the UK and we have a substantial muslim population. So I don't see this clear-cut cultural us and them between the EU and Turkey that you seem to.

      If the possibility of EU membership encourages Turkey to improve on its human rights record, then I see that as a good thing.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  89. This shouldn't be slashdot news. by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It is news worthy no doubt. However this is AP high visility news. Every single newspaper, even your high school daily will have or already had an article on that. There is no need for slashdot to discuss it unless there is something new or interesting that is not widely discussed about avian flu. A slashdot user should try to find scientific papers or articles on the issue, post a well substantiated comment on that and give us links to those articles/paper. I read BBC every day by my self, don't need anyone to point me to that.

    1. Re:This shouldn't be slashdot news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Stuff That Matters.

  90. Antibiotics? by StefanJ · · Score: 1

    I call bull on this damn fool.

    We're talking about a VIRUS. Antibiotics are not effective against viruses. (In fact, one of the reasons that common antibiotics are becoming less effective is the phenomena of dumb-cluck mommas who insist Junior get penicillin every time he gets the sniffles.)

  91. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by Peachy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So it's killed 60 people in the last few months. Passive smoking kills 30 a day. Why the big deal over the bird flu?

  92. from a newly local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I moved to Brasov from the US this year. I eat chicken regularly here (which makes me an anomaly relative to the pork eating population around me, not relative to news junkie hypochondriacs from whom I recently departed) and have yet to worry about any highly improbable ill-effects. While it is true the disease is spreading slowly around the world and the billions of your tax dollars spent on Tamiflu are ineffective, there is little need to puke back superficial soundbites about "1918" and "20% mortality" as if a catastrophe were imminent and the Commander In Chief really needed to mobilize the armed forces en masse to conduct hull containment, effectively prevent you from escaping your diseased cage when the end hits.

    Oh, and let me chime in late... Slashdot has seriously devolved. Where's the migration been heading?

  93. Facts About the Bird Flu by Captain+Chad · · Score: 1

    This article gives the ongoing status of the H5N1 bird flu and includes a short primer on flu pandemics. Disclaimer: I'm the author.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
  94. Re:Hehehe... yer green young'un by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    " G.W. Bush is the smartest man she's ever met in her life"
    She fails to mention that the only other person she has ever met is Paulie Shore

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  95. One thing is for certain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... there is no stopping them...

    And I, for one, welcome our new viral overlords.

  96. Not worried yet by cryptoluddite · · Score: 1

    I won't really be worried about bird flu in humans until Rove is indicted and Bush needs a really bad catastrophe to distract everyone's attention or just declare martial law over.

    1. Spread bird flu
    2. Declare martial law
    4. Grand jury records destroyed in 'restoration' attempt.
    5. ...
    6. Exxon profits

    There is no step three.

  97. A question for Intelligent Design supporters by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So is this evolution taking place, or is the Intelligent Designer designing a virus that could potentialy wipe out a whole bunch of us?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:A question for Intelligent Design supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Pesky Scientists 'wash hands, observe good hygene, practice low-risk behaviour.
      2. Luddites and 'Intelligent Designer' types ignore all of that foolish 'hand washing' and such. There is no such thing as evolution.
      3. Luddites die, Scientists live
      4. Darwinian theory is carried on by the hand-washers. "Intelligent Designers" are give a mass of Christian burial.
      5. Q.E.D.

  98. Missing the point by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of post that go along the lines of: "Doom sayer nonsense" and "over rated, nothing is going to happen."

    Well you people are missing the point. There will be a pandemic. Its as sure a thing as earthquakes and hurricanes. If not the avian flu then some other disease. It happens every 100 years or so.

    The point is that there are things that we can and should do that may lessen the effects of the next major outbreak. We need monitoring procedures put into place that will give us early warning of possible outbreaks. We also need efficient methods of developing and distributing vaccines for potential outbreaks. There are other things also.

    I read one person's post who made the point that even the 1918 our break only kill about 5% of the population. Like that in some way makes the 50 to 100 million who died a smaller number.

    I'm afraid that I don't have a warm and fuzzy feeling about man's ability to survive. I think we're just smart enough to see the dog shit in the yard but to arrogant and self centered to walk around it rather that stepping into it.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  99. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Couple that with you being badly wrong, it kills the middle aged
    disproportionately - those that keep the systems of civilisation working.'

    Somebody care to cite a link to this information?

  100. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it's good to be prepaired for a worst case senerio, but in all reality, any two flu strains could merge and create a super flu at any given time, and any two flu strains could merge and die at any given time. So I really don't think its worth panicing, nor posting on SlashDot.

    This reminds me of that old joke:
    "It's alright, I've never had any serious accidents while driving."
    "You're only going to have one."

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  101. Parrots? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Is this just effecting 'food chain' type birds, or does it also hit more exotic pets?

    Not saying it would be good to lose all our food poultry from our diets and dooming us to 2 choices of meats, but losing a pet can be devastating to many.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  102. The 1918 flu was purely Avian as well by NewIntellectual · · Score: 0

    A very recent issue of Science magazine (the top peer reviewed scientific journal in the U.S.) has a report on the recent sequencing of the 1918 flu virus. There is now no doubt that it was an avian virus, with enough combination of genetic factors (no single one responsible) to make it both virulent and deadly. One factor that made it so deadly - it is now known - was that it could infect more deeply into the lungs than most viruses, and destroy the alveoli, the air sacs of the lungs.

    The problem is that the current "bird flu" is also an avian virus, with an extremely high mortality rate in humans - and though it cannot currently pass from human to human, it might acquire the ability to do so. If it does (or, when) then the hope is that the mutated virus will have a much lower mortality rate than it does now. But even if it was "only" as bad as the 1918 virus, hundreds of millions would die.

  103. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if it mutates it won't be 1918. We can treat pneumonia now. Secondary pneumonia was responsible for most deaths.

  104. Re:Don't Panic ( not yet anyway... ) by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Absolutlely right! I'm organizing a flu immunisation program in my local area (South West UK), and we want to jab as many people as possilble. The vaccines wont do anything to protect against bird flu, but what we don't want is for someone to have both at once. If that happens there is the risk of the viruses 'interbreeding' and then you've got a much more lethal flu that goes human to human.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  105. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


    So what this means is that if the bird flu and another strain mutate in one cell, there are hundreds of possibilities.

    And millions of infected cells producing them. And viruses A and B re-infecting infected cells again and again to jumble it up repeatedly. Mathematics says we'll be unlucky, I'm afraid.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  106. Pfft... by tom+vendetta · · Score: 1

    I already raided the australian factory, busted through the windows with my ak's and my flash bangs, stole about 4 cases of tamiflu and was gone.

  107. Who the F' cares! It's media hype! by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    There is all this media hype about the "Deadly Bird Flu!", how many people have actually died of it ?

    60!!!

    Out of a world population of 6.4 billion!

    Thats,ooh let me see now .. (please correct me here my math REALLY sucks ) ..

    0.0000000009375% of the worlds population.

    And that's classed as an epidemic ?!?

    1. Re:Who the F' cares! It's media hype! by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Um, THIS outbreak. This year. This doesn't count the hundreds of others that have died since 1997.

      It's not that it's a pandemic.... YET. Because it can't transmit human/human yet. YET. As with all virii, it's the yet that gets us.

      Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  108. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1
    Sort of. These were not normal pnumonia. The pnumonia was most severe in young adults and the autopsies found lungs that were dark and very heavy, almost liver-like. We certainly can do better with oxygen tents and what not to get people over the worst stages. BUT, if this is a 1918 like pandemic, it will spread about as fast as people can travel. With jet travel common, it may spread within a few weeks to the entire planet. People are contagous before they are sympomatic, and some people are contagous and never become symptomatic. So any quaranteen are almost certain to fail, but it may buy a little time.

    Most of the world will not have the level of care we have in the US, Western Europe and other advanced nations. They will be SOL and they will not get the treatments you describe. In 1918, the medical facilities in the US were completely overwhelmed. Even if we are able to handle a few dozen severe cases of pnumonia in a modern urban hospital, they cannot handle hundreds of sinultanious cases. So, the worst case could be truely terrible. Hopefully, we won't see a worst case, but I find it useful to overestimate how complexy nature can be and underestimate our 'power' over nature.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  109. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by alx.slashdot · · Score: 1

    Good point talking about prevention. Here's how it goes in this case: the Romanian government finally admitted that the dead birds in the Danube Delta had died of bird flu. So they started to take measures. The first one was to kill all poultry in the area to prevent spreading the desease. Second measure was to quarantine the entire area and to force all cars entering and leaving the area to go through a disinfection process. Now it gets a little murky. They wanted everybody to do a vaccine so that they could prevent combining bird flu and human flu. Since Romania cannot produce enough vaccine on its own and right now it's a little late to start creating it, they turned to the biggest producers. They discoverred the entire french vaccine production has been bought by the US government. As far as I know, no case of bird flu has been found in the US yet.

  110. Re:Hehehe... yer green young'un by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I sit,
    my cheeks a flexin'-
    Giving birth to
    a Connecticut Texan.

  111. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by bigberk · · Score: 1

    So maybe you THINK you shouldn't care because disease only affects the weak, or the old... the 1918 pandemic had the highest mortality rate among 20 to 30 year olds, the healthiest segment of the population. Researchers discovered that this current avian strain has genetic similarities to the virus causing the spanish flu in 1918, as published in Science and Nature I believe.

  112. Learn to use a period by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god man learn to use a period in your sig. I can't stant to look at your post.

    1. Re:Learn to use a period by m50d · · Score: 1

      That sig is not supposed to make sense, it was made by following the instructions in someone else's sexually reproducing sig.

      --
      I am trolling
  113. Of course, you wouldn't by andersh · · Score: 1

    No, of course, you don't see it. That's because Britain is just that little bit different from the rest of Europe. Are you really a part of Europe? You have a much more [non-European] multi-cultural society than most. Do you remember that total flop you sent to the Eurovision competition - Europe hated it, Britain loved it. For other reasons I believe that De Gaulle was right, the UK should never have become a member. You have far more in common with the US - culturally and politically. Perhaps you agree with me?

    It's not Islam that's the problem - because I believe the largely Muslim Bosnia and Herzegovina should become a member. However that's a clear cut case of a European nation, clearly within the borders of what I consider Europe. Do you know why Bosnia is a Muslim nation? Turkey invaded that part of Europe - colonized and forced the population to convert. Of course that's not an argument against Turkey today - it's just an explanation why a Muslim nation is not incompatible with a European identity. Turkey has never had any European identity at all. I respect Islam and Muslims - however it's not a concern or part of the European Union project. That's what our Neighbourhood project is for.

    1. Re:Of course, you wouldn't by peamasii · · Score: 0

      As much as I agree with you on everything else, the UK is not the only EU country with a large Muslim population. Therefore, the comment was possibly right... many of the EU countries will accept Turkey if only to alleviate their own cross-cultural problems.

    2. Re:Of course, you wouldn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had several false statements about the Bosnia and Herzegovina.

      First, Bosnia nad Herzegovina is not a Muslim nation but a multiconfessional nation, like most Balkan nations are. However, Muslims are relative majority (sub-half, but still the largest confessional group) in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

      Second, Turks did not FORCE anyone to convert, at least in Bosnia, they didn't had to. Alleged forced conversion, thru conditional aid in food during a famine, Turks staged in nearby Montenegro, few centuries later, as a part of campaign to pacificate that traditionaly rebelous country. I guess Turks considered that "voluntary" (no physical force used), since AFAIK Kuran explicitly prohibits forced conversion. Such political hipocrisy is not uncommon even today in North-South (haves-have nots) relations.

      In Bosnia, the Turks were welcomed by ancestors of today Boshniaks (Muslim Bosnians) as liberators from Christian opressors who forcefully exstinguished their original "Bosnian Church" (considered heretical) in early Middle Ages. Most of them voluntarily accepted Islam, among other things as a way to make even with their opressors, to be a part of a MAJOR modern, young, vibrant, righteous, disruptive force on a quest to better the world (all that beeing not irony but, at the time, truth... makes you wonder about today, eh?).

      IMHO, Turks are nowadays (and for some time now) more European then some former Otoman Empire parts west of them and in some fields they dwarf even some of the "old European" nations. "Bridge" notion is nonsense - if they get into EU, the "bridge" will "close" on the east side. OTOH, their potencial future economic and even technological/scientific contribution to Europe is not to be dismissed as insignificant.

  114. Re:Deny it all you want... OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your a theological idiot. Read my reply several posts up regarding Revalations and the series of events foretold. If you think Christ is coming any time soon your in for a big suprise. Your perhaps wishfully thinking about the rapture which is forecast to appear sometime pre/mid or post the tribulation period or in other words the thousand year reign of the antichrist. After that is the return of the christ who is, according to the bible, to reign for a millenium. Ask any biblical scholar and by biblical scholar I don't mean that goofy morron priest/preacher who's obviously taught you nothing about the bible.

  115. Re:Oh No - Antibiotics by hexdcml · · Score: 1
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but antibiotics will do bugger all. This is flu - a type of virus. Antibiotics won't do anything at all, unless you get secondary pathogenic infections. Pffft.
    Anti-viral meds to exist, and the British government is stockpiling the drugs, but I think they only have enough for a half* the population.

    * - I think.. I did not RTFA.

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
  116. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Mortality rates for this flu are right now at 50%. Passive smoking rates are at 30/6,000,000,000.
    I believe that explains what the big deal is.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  117. Whoa! Easy champ! by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Quick to jump the gun and insult others, aren't we AC? Why are you so defensive? How could you know what I know or don't know?

    "All these are the beginning of sorrows" (Matt 24:8) AC. Believe it or not. You have your own free agency. You choose what you will believe. I believe the summer is nigh at hand and that the bible is factually correct.

    Go ahead. Have a temper tantrum.

    1. Re:Whoa! Easy champ! by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      I believe the summer is nigh at hand
      But... It's OCTOBER!!! The summer is WAAAAY over. Damn near Winter.
      I believe that the bible as well as EVERY holy text for every religion are merely a best case scenario for tuning human behavior. They are a ruleset. No more no less. Otherwise, if there was a TRULY factual account, there would be ONE and ONLY ONE religion as all others would vanish in a puff of logic. So either ALL religions are incorrect, or ALL religions are perfectly accurate. After all, How could God, Jehova, Allah, Vishnu, Nammu, and may others have created the same universe at the same time? Or are you So conceited that you will assert that Only the Christians are right?
      Or perhaps they were all facets of the same creator? If that were the case, why would that creator allow so many varied views to propagate for so long?
      But Back to the topic... How many deaths has overzealousness caused?

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
  118. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because of the 117 confirmed cases 60 died.

  119. Re:Bird Flu could kill far more than last epidemic by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

    Actually I have zero technical knowledge.

  120. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by lahvak · · Score: 1

    So what this means is that if the bird flu and another strain mutate in one cell, there are hundreds of possibilities. You could wind up with a dead virus, a weak virus, a slight modification of the other strain that the body already has a defence against, a new virus that the immune system can adapt to, a new virus that the body can not adapt to(worst case)

    Yes, but if you have thousands or even millions of cells where this happens, you have pretty high chance of getting all the possibilities. The weak viruses won't survive, so you will be left with the strong and nasty ones.

    --
    AccountKiller
  121. Are you full of Shit? Re:Chicken Shit by n54 · · Score: 1

    First: I do think you are nothing but a troll but there are many who honestly and earnestly hold your opinions. Perhaps they will read this and start thinking.

    Daily ratio of Iraqi civilians dead: almost all caused by ignorant, xenophobic, theologically racist, triggerhappy morons in the name of Islam which they in no way represent (they can't have read or understood anything in the Koran, otherwise they would realize they are blasphemers). What else than a blasphemer can one call someone who says they kill in the name of a God when that God says that killing another person is like killing a universe, that the person killing will be held responsible for the destruction of an entire world? Those who shout Allah Akhbar (God is great) when they hurt and kill others are probably reserved a special place in hell if the Koran is to be believed.

    In other words: do you blame US troops for terrorists killing Iraqi citizens? How delusional is that?

    Humans dead from H5N1: about 60 and a lot more would have died if one hadn't taken any measures at all - that is even if it doesn't turn into a man-to-man pandemic. If it does turn into such a pandemic only our preparations, enormous effort to find a cure, and the mercy of God will help us.

    In other words: are you saying doctors and scientists, as well as health officials and just about anybody shouldn't do their best to prevent disease and death? Do you think it even matters whether or not it has a "natural" origin?

    Biological attack? Since any disease is a biological attack I presume you actually mean that as in a military biological weapons attack. Do you believe the CIA created HIV? Otherwise you realize that H5N1 is completely natural and that similar viruses has appeared throughout human history (last really big one was the Spanish flu).

    In other words: are you livining in your own little world of shadowy conspiracies made to order to explain all those things you either simply don't or can't understand or which in your opinion it takes to much of your time to educate yourself about? Do you believe you are well informed?

    The earthquake in Pakistan is beyond the current level of human knowledge to avoid. One can prepare for it with building codes and organisation. After the fact one can help the survivors as much as possible. In either case what does not help is if the country is rife with bad blood and civil struggles, underdeveloped and engaged in a miniature cold war (with India) as well as a low-level hot one (terrorism), and has spent more money on nuclear weaponry than elevating the living standard of its population - that being said I recommend all to give to NGO's and the Red Cross Red Cresent (I have and I'm not rich, far from it this computer I use to write this is the most expensive thing I have ever owned).

    In other words: do you think that humans are that powerful? Is there no limit to your hubris?

    I do not believe you work in the Turkish poultry industry, I do not even believe you are a Turkish citizen. If you think you are a muslim I cry for you. If you think you are informed I feel pity for you. If you think you are awake, alert, and using your brain I think you are delusional.

    So right back at you: wake up yourself.

    --
    this comment is provided "as is" and without any express or implied legibility or congruity [...]
    1. Re:Are you full of Shit? Re:Chicken Shit by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Wooooo!!! Thank you for posting this. This is a wake up call for any human person. With an ounce of humanity left in them. It (and you) even made my friend list. :) - Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  122. Re:Whoa! Easy champ! Easy Chump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Believe what you will. The facts are the bible specifically chronos the end times. Even if your pre-trib were talking one million + one thousand years before the earth is destroyed. Every step of the way you've a choice to make if you believe this rot. The only thing not foretold was the pre/mid or post trib rapture. The pre folks believe god will spare them the tribulation. The mid and post folks believe god will test their faith. Every bit of abhorent stench extruded from the mouths of the Pat Robertson's and Jerry Falwell's of this earth are nothing but foul excrement misleading everyone.

  123. India also by paxmark1 · · Score: 1

    Although not identified by the WHO yet, I was impressed by a piece in the online Asia Times about a month ago about how the virus had spread further and the author described several large scale die offs of specific wild bird species in specific sites in western China, Siberia, and also parts of India. I have seen that info nowhere else. Sorry, do not have the url.

    Many wild ducks can carry it non-fatally (like skunks can carry rabies for quite a while and not die).

    H5N1 is going to get out all over Europe. Swan species are going to be hit hard in numerous places. Anyone heard anything about mortality rates in geese. Also - does anyone have any ideas about what this will do to more Arctic summering species?

    I just rented the Winged Migration dvd just a couple weeks ago. I viewed with a slightly different lens this time.

    peace.

  124. Avian Flu can be cure with Tamiflu (Roche Pharma) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's over done - big scare of nothing

  125. Can we PLEASE stop with the conspiracy theories??? by calculadoru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mate. Can we PLEASE stop with the conspiracy theories??? If you can bring yourself to even suspect that the avian flu might have been manufactured by big pharma, what's next? We never went to the moon? Aliens built the pyramids?
    As for the Iraq seed bank - get real for a second. It's WAR. The Yanks don't give two flying fucks what they are bombing as long as it looks good on Fox News. Stop seeing a conspiracy in everything - it's war (and worse, a war based on a monumental set of lies which they can no longer cover up, so it's bound to get even more senseless).
    Not that this matters, but I am from Romania and would rather people talk about scientific facts and give sensible ideas on how to deal with the flu, rather than go on about evil conglomerates.
    Come ON.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  126. How about this one? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    infected bird tossed in a pen with one million healthy birds. all 1,000,001 birds are destoyed.

    1. Re:How about this one? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the real risk there is with these virulent diseases. If you do nothing, assuming the infected bird indeed carries H5N1, most of the birds will die in a matter of days, with the real risk of spreading the disease during the incubation period (when many will be contagious without having any visible symptoms). If you do take action, you may be able to stop the spread.

      Culling isn't the only action that can be taken. High density poultry farming (much an issue in the West) and frequent direct contact with poultry (much an issue in SE Asia) are prime candidates for issues to be tackled.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  127. Get a flu shot and wash your hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the deadly H5N1 (which is a bit different from the H1N1 "Spanish Flu" that killed 40,000,000 in 1918), is likely to spread as a 'ride-along' beside another less deadly influenza variant, it's probably best to get a flu shot to protect against the lesser bug (and keep the deadly one out as a bonus). The other thing to do is to WASH YOUR HANDS! 20 seconds of scrubbing under tepid running water with soap (antibacterial soap is not necessary since this isn't bacteria --it's a virus). If you aren't sure about the 20 seconds part, one chorus of the song 'Happy Birthday to you' is enough. If this bug is spread from migrating waterfowl to a pig farm and mutates, it could be easily spread to people (from person to person). At that point, the shot and washing are all you have left (and hope you aren't one of the 1.3 billion expected to die from this one).
    Sorry to bring you all down, but fore-warned is fore-armed. Take heed!

  128. Encouraging News by tombuon · · Score: 1

    Chinese state media is claiming a new, low-cost spray vaccine that could protect birds from the H5N1 strain has been developed. Let's hope this is for real. http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L15489494 .htm

  129. Mutations by Kadmos · · Score: 1

    I heard on the news this morning that the virus has mutated as well in Vietnam(?), and that the the drugs that some govts are stockpilling are ineffective against the mutation.

  130. Right wing loons said the same thing about Clinton by ccmay · · Score: 1
    this could just be the ace in the hole to retain power and finally transform us into the facist state they have been laying the groundwork for for years.

    Sure it will. Just like the crazies on the far right used to say about Clinton. It was crap then, and it's crap now when you say it. Not just crap, but an insult to the American people.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  131. Re:Right wing loons said the same thing about Clin by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

    Sure it will. Just like the crazies on the far right used to say about Clinton. It was crap then, and it's crap now when you say it. Not just crap, but an insult to the American people.

    Funny, I'm American and I find the current administration an insult to the American people. I guess this list of fourteen characteristics of fascism is also crap. Fascism could never happen here right? Sleep well with that assurance my friend.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  132. Re:Right wing loons said the same about Clinton by ccmay · · Score: 1
    Funny, I'm American and I find the current administration an insult to the American people.

    Well, I felt insulted every day of the Clinton administration, so I guess that makes us square. But Clinton was no fascist, and neither is Bush. For you to argue otherwise is a gross display of your own ignorance and hysterical partisan shrillness, not to mention an insult to the memory of the victims of real fascism.

    A new President will be sworn in a little more than three years from now, and he might even be a Democrat. You can bank on that. I'm a Bush man through and through, but I'd be out there with you on the barricades if he dared to try to cling to power after January 2009. Give your political opponents at least that much credit.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  133. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    So it's killed 60 people in the last few months. Passive smoking kills 30 a day. Why the big deal over the bird flu?
    Passive smoking is *assumed* to kill 30 people a day - based on statistical sampling and meausurement. (I.E. there is no way to conduct an autopsy and with 100% percent accurracy state that the cause of death was passive smoking.)

    Bird flu, unlike passive smoking, can be transmitted from individual to individual.

    If you encounter my wife (I'm a smoker), my smoke poses a statistically insignificant risk to you. If I have the bird flu, she has a high chance of becoming a carrier, and you have a non trivial chance of becoming infectd.

  134. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bird flu, unlike passive smoking, can be transmitted from individual to individual."

    That's where you're wrong. As of now, it can't. It can only be transmitted from birds to humans, which is why they're worried about a person with a normal, human flu getting this bird flu - exchange of their DNA could lead to a strain of bird flu that is transmissable from human to human.

  135. "didn't even know which continent Romania is on" by benhocking · · Score: 1

    The comment I replied to stated that the person who wrote Dracula "probably didn't even know which continent Romania is on". If this doesn't imply American, then it's hard to imagine what would without actually saying something like "begins with an 'A' and ends with 'merican'". Sure, there are people in Europe who don't know what continent Romania is on, just like there are people in the US who don't know that New Mexico is one of our states. Nevertheless, it seems fairly clear to me what the implication was.

    That is an interesting tidbit on the bats, though. Did vampire bats get their name before Bram Stoker's story or was the naming partly due to its influence?

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  136. Re:What hype? Happens all the time. by RingDev · · Score: 1

    So why haven't you been in a panic state of fear for the last 40 years?

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  137. Re:Don't Panic ( not yet anyway... ) by zobier · · Score: 1
    According to Xinhua:
    The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned that the H5N1 bird flu strain is mutating into a new subtype which could be transmitted among humans
    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  138. Re:Delta of Danube - So? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    Passive smoking kills 30 a day. Why the big deal over the bird flu?

    I completely agree with your point, but have to point out this nonsense. Passive smoking doesn't kill 30 a day. There isn't even conclusive proof that it kills at all. Every time you hear these figures they are inflated higher. My bet is that your 30/day source is based on the completely discredited 1992 EPA "report", which they are still touting dispite there even being congressional inquests into it's falsehood. It wasn't even a real study, it was a meta-study. Which in terms of research is completely worthless as meta-studes can be summed up with "after throwing out all evidence to the contary, my results show...".

  139. Re:Don't Panic ( not yet anyway... ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you say "Fear mongering"

  140. I call under informed (Re: I call bullshit by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    The BBC beats the crap out of American news media, but their science reporting is known not to be the best.

    WHO and various organizations around the world are terrified that the avian flu will soon jump species. Similar events have happened before and many top scientists see it as very likely to the point where they do not take it as abstract "maybe".

    This problem would not exist if people did not raise livestock in densely populated buildings, pens, and lots where disease can spread so easily.

    Furthermore, more then a few livestock producers have been caught feeding vaccines to livestock, a practice that in America has rendered many antibiotics useless for human beings.

    Raising livestock in densely populated facilities makes the disease a problem. Such facilities exist to make meat cheap enough for people to it all of the time. Most people do not need to eat meat at all. If you take sentiment and preference out of the equation the common sense answer would be to reduce such facilities as well as meat consumption.

  141. Re:Yes bet on the web page with Last Updated April by stm2 · · Score: 1

    I know this is a real virus, not a computer one. I DID the comparation NOT BETWEEN the viri, but between the way general media companies (like BBC and CNN) show specific information. Here in Slashdot, most people can understand when CNN gets wrong in computer security. What I wanted to say, is that the same WAY the news is missunderstood by big media about computer security, it happends with other fields, like emerging diseases.
    Regarding the page I submit it as good source, I forgot to tell, but what matter most are the linksm like these:
            * ProMED-mail Archives
            * Medscape: Requires prior registration (free)
            * WHO Outbreak News

    The ProMED mailing list is a UP TO THE MINUTE news about outbreaks, and is even better that ANY medium because is not under any gov't suppervision and high queality information flows without censure (some countries wont happily release information that could affect them by several millons of lost of exports)

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  142. Sig by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm just commenting on your sig. Can you explain to me why you have it and what it means to you? Just asking... cuz I'm a greatgreatgreatgrandniece. :) Provable, too. :P - Jho

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    1. Re:Sig by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Its there to make people think.

      To get them to think about their place in the world, make them question what they feel is right and wrong, and that they need to sometimes think outside the box.

      As far as why i think he was a patriot: He saw his country being destroyed by the actions of Lincoln, and placed his life on the line in order to defend his country..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Sig by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Very very interesting. :) Nice little nudge in the side there. It certainly made me think. And it made me think about why he did the things that he did, including running away to join the Actor's in the US. There are a lot of writings that believe that JWB was mentally unstable, and while I can provide much factual evidence to support that, I do think that he believed he was doing what was right to save his country. Or his country in the light that he saw it. -- Whatever his mindset, he still was a patriot.

      While I no longer reside in the South (Valdosta, GA was home until I was 4), I remain both a Daughter of the Revolution and a Daughter of the Confederacy. And my grandfather still hangs his Stars and Bars over his fireplace, which I don't get... but I know his casket will be covered with it. Though he fought in 2 wars for this United States, he is forever a Son of the South. :)

      Sometimes I think our heritage shall all be lost as the decades roll on. I fear it more than I fear death, for it is our heritage which are immortal. All I can do is pass the stotries onto my children in the hopes they shall be remembered.

      FTR, I married a Yankee. :D - Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    3. Re:Sig by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I may be a northerner myself, but my heart is still in the south.

      History is important, it should never be lost or diluted over the generations.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Sig by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      Amen. :D

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  143. On Turkey by andersh · · Score: 1

    > First, Bosnia nad Herzegovina is not a Muslim nation but a multiconfessional nation
    Read my post again - it says "largely Muslim"... in other words not all.

    > Second, Turks did not FORCE anyone to convert,
    You seem to both disagree and agree with me on that, don't you? It still holds true that Turkey attacked and colonized the Balkans. I sympathize with Austria and strongly disapprove of letting Turkey in the backdoor after we kicked them out the last time.

    >MAJOR modern, young, vibrant, righteous... blah
    You do know that the Christian church is still the world's largest? I don't know what you mean by 'major' in this sense. Perhaps you meant larger than some minor church in Bosnia? It's of no importance regardless.

    >Turks are nowadays (and for some time now) more European then some former Otoman Empire parts west
    Exactly what is European? In my opinion that's for us Europeans to decide - and Turkey's not part of that community no matter what it wants to believe. If the Turkish army let their guard down the true face of the Justice and Development party would be revealed. As much as the well educated population of western Turkey might want to belong to a secular nation - I believe the truth is that a majority of Turks would rather have a more religious state. Religion is important here because a modern European nation is not ruled by such laws. The people are not European in geograpical terms either - when did the Turkmen (as in all of them) people suddenly discover their Europeaness? They have more in common with people to the east of Turkey. Face it, it's just a project that Ataturk in his foolishness invented to develop the country. Good for Turkey, but we're not interested.

    >in some fields they dwarf even some of the "old
    How can they dwarf anyone when the question is if they are European or not? You cannot eliminate another European country - it's not that kind of game. It's either a European nation or it's not.
    What you think of the matter is of course not important since you're not European, from our point of view Turkey is not a European nation in any sense. Turkey doesn't take part in any of our cultural traditions and heritage - Christianity is central to the European spirit. It's where our values are founded and our laws built upon. No, I'm sorry to say that Turkey cannot ever become European - even by emulating us they'll always be outsiders.

    >the bridge is nonsense
    Right you are - they're not a bridge to the Muslim world. They're not even Arabs. So what does the US accomplish by forcing Turkey down Europe's throat? It gets to keep it's bases from which it can mount attacks on neighbouring countries. It has nothing to do with what Europe wants or needs - it's just America looking out for number #1.

    >their potencial future economic and even technological/scientific contribution to Europe is not to be dismissed as insignificant.
    I'm not saying they are insignificant - I'm just saying that I don't see Turkey a part of my Union. Trade is the least of my worries - it's about creating social unity so that we can move on forwards. The European Union is destined to become a federal nation - and I don't see it ever bordering Iraq/Iran. The US will continue to push for Turkey, but in the end Turkey will be rejected not only by the people but also the governments of Europe.