Slashdot Mirror


Apple and AT&T Announce iPhone Service Plans

daveschroeder writes "Apple and AT&T today announced service plans for iPhone, 4 days before its release in the US at 6pm local time on Friday, June 29. The plans are $59.99/mo for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes, and $99.99 for 1350 minutes, and all include unlimited data, 200 SMS messages, rollover minutes, and unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling. Any other standard AT&T service plan may also be used. A two year service plan is required, with a $175 cancellation fee if terminated early. In addition, activations are done via iTunes, so only the hardware is purchased in the store. Interestingly, activation of a contract via iTunes is required to enable the iPod/syncing functionality of the phone as well. (It will remain to be seen whether there are workarounds for this for those who only want the iPod functionality of iPhone, and whether the iPhone is easily unlockable for those who wish to try it on alternate carriers, and so on.)"

538 comments

  1. Alternate Carriers by omeomi · · Score: 1

    whether the iPhone is easily unlockable for those who wish to try it on alternate carriers, and so on.

    I thought one could purchase an unlocked iPhone from the Apple stores, instead of going to AT&T?

    1. Re:Alternate Carriers by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Informative

      nope, its only Apple stores and select AT&T stores are carrying it. In no way has it ever been stated that you can buy a unlocked phone. Jobs was very clear to the fact that the iPhone was a 2 year AT&T exclusive.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    2. Re:Alternate Carriers by adamstew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope...The iPhone is exclusive to AT&Tingular for a "Multi year exclusive" So...unless someone finds a way to unlock it, the iPhone at AT&T are married for a minimum of 2 years in the USA...there has been speculation that it's a 5 year exclusive for the USA, but no one knows for sure yet.

      According to the article, you buy the phone from apple or AT&T unactivated...You then use iTunes to activate the phone and your plan. It seems Apple wanted total control over the unboxing and activation experience...they didn't want oily prepubescent AT&T sales reps get their greasy fingerprints all over someone's brand new iPhone :)

    3. Re:Alternate Carriers by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it's not quite that simple.

      Here is who's carrying it:

      - Apple retail stores
      - Apple online store
      - AT&T corporate stores (not corporate kiosks or resellers initially, but those may come in the future)

      As to the other points:

      Yes, it's always been generally said that iPhone would require a two year contract, but what was said at the keynote was that the agreement between Apple and AT&T was a "multi year exclusive", which has subsequently been revealed to be five years. Until today, it appeared that AT&T would be selling the phones with mandatory activation, whereas you could just walk out with a phone from the Apple store. So, a lot of people were hoping that the phone was hackable or easily unlockable, so as to use it with other carriers. If the iTunes activation thing is easily worked around AND the phone is unlockable in some way, then you might be able to move it to another carrier. The worst case scenario - assuming the phone is unlockable - is that you sign on with AT&T, have them unlock the phone after 90 days (assuming it's unlockable in this way), cancel the contract, and move to another carrier. Obviously, a lot of people are hoping they can just buy the hardware, unlock it somehow, and use it on the carrier of their choice. That may still be possible, but we really won't know until people start playing with these things.

    4. Re:Alternate Carriers by mmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That fact alone is almost worth the cost of the iPhone.

      Also, they make it super easy to transfer an existing number. Bravo Apple!!

    5. Re:Alternate Carriers by adamstew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also...check out http://www.apple.com/iphone/usingiphone/activation .html for a video on how to activate using iTunes...It would seem that this is the same for iPhones bought at AT&T stores and Apple Stores. So...lines should be quick...just go in, pay for the phone, and go home to activate... None of this activating a plan and taking 30 minutes to get going bull that normally comes with buying a cell phone...In, Pay, Out, Activate.

      Lines should move fairly quickly.

    6. Re:Alternate carriers by rekoil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you'll lose the Visual Voicemail system - you can always just call the VM number to check messages like everyone else does today.

    7. Re:Alternate Carriers by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to second this one. Everyone was worried that it would take 30 minutes in the store to activate the phone. This way, you can do it at home. It also has some benefits in that it gets people used to using iTunes with the phone which obviously benefits Apple. This is a very slick product. Some people don't like slick and I can appreciate that, but I love slick.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:Alternate Carriers by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The very fact that its activated through iTunes means that even if you can unlock it to a different carrier it will then be completely unusable through standard iTunes. So meaning even if you can unlock it it won't be very useful for anything but a mobile phone. I'm guessing after the 5 year contract (Apples contract with AT&T not yours) other vendors will also appear in the iTunes activation. So in reality your 2 year contract is 5 years as it will be 5 years before you can use anything but AT&T.

    9. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For those of us (maybe it's just me now, I don't know) who don't use, and don't ever wish to use iTunes, that's actually not a bad thing.

      I'll stick with Songbird, thank you very much.

    10. Re:Alternate carriers by duranaki · · Score: 1

      And I wonder if/when at&t will open that enhanced voicemail api up so that other phones can implement visual voicemail. Love those open standards...

    11. Re:Alternate Carriers by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      There's something seriously whacked about that video. Near the end, when it shows how much capacity is left on the iPhone, it shows "Audio 25.64 GB, Video 13.09 GB, Other 12.55 GB, and Free Space as 23.13 GB." Unless they've made some serious unannounced upgrades to the iPhone, that is completely messed up. The other possibility is that they're actually using an 80 GB iPod for the demonstration, but I'm not sure how that is possible.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    12. Re:Alternate Carriers by Gompers · · Score: 1, Redundant

      If by "carrier of your choice" you mean T-Mobile, I'm sure it might be possible. Those are really the only two pervasive GSM carriers in the US. There are a few regional ones that are GSM, but the other big boys (Verizon, Spring, US Cellular etc) are all CDMA here. No matter how "unlocked" the phone gets, you won't be able to use it with those carriers. Also, EDGE will be EDGE regardless of who the carrier is.

      My biggest gripe with the iPhone is that it's EDGE/GSM and it's with a carrier that has horrible coverage in areas that I frequent (rural Iowa). Also, it doesn't really "do" anything that my Treo 755 doesn't. I just recently bought the 755 after looking at what the iPhone was going to offer, and couldn't find one compelling reason to buy the iPhone over it. Granted, I don't listen to a whole lot of music on my phone, and I'm sure that might be handy (though with ptunes, the phone is certainly capable), but I can browse a useful web, listen to streaming internet radio, watch TV via the EVDO network and my slingbox, watch videos, get my e-mail with attachments, synch seamlessly with the exchange server at work (contacts, calendar and push e-mail) even over the VPN (using Movian), SSH, use it as a tethered modem via bluetooth for data, built-in google maps, decent camera (though by no means great) etc. Having come from the Kyocera 6035 in the past, I wasn't enthused with the thought of losing my keyboard.

      Really there just isn't anything that the iPhone does that I want that I can't get in the 755, plus the 755 comes with EVDO. Not to mention it only cost me 275 bucks.

      Now I'm not saying it's going to be a failure, I just don't see a compelling feature set over the existing bevy of smartphones. This might turn into the smartphone for the masses, but it's going to be because of marketing and slick packaging, not utility, practicality or price.

    13. Re:Alternate Carriers by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Like you, I don't use now nor do I want to use iTunes in the future. Unlike you, it seems, I have no intention of getting an iPhone either.

      I won an Apple nano at a Christmas party in 2004. It's still in the box.

      Not everybody wants to use Apple products.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    14. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that just iTunes with a stupid color scheme? Maybe not, since they have a fanart section. I'd rather not use a media player with a fanart section, really...

    15. Re:Alternate Carriers by rfunches · · Score: 1

      I think that's the space on the HD; you can see in the wide shot of iTunes that the capacity of the iPhone is still 7.27 GB.

    16. Re:Alternate carriers by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that they'll both make it as hard as possible to switch. On the other hand, perhaps when the iPhone is rolled out in other markets, some firmware hacks will be available as per other devices.

      Would not bet on it, tho'. If I was apple, I'd lock this down as tight as a tick. Plenty of people out there seem happy to buy expensive iPod, although cheaper mp3 players often offer more flexibility and function.

    17. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod Nano came out in September 2005. Next time you lie to bolster your claims do some research first.

    18. Re:Alternate Carriers by pboulang · · Score: 1

      It only has those numbers at the end when it zooms in.. the rest of the time it is just the 8GB.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    19. Re:Alternate Carriers by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      wanna send me that nano?

    20. Re:Alternate Carriers by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 1

      I thought one could purchase an unlocked iPod from the Apple stores, instead of going to AT&T?

      --
      The following statement is true
      The preceding statement is false
    21. Re:Alternate Carriers by amontiel · · Score: 1

      Did anybody notice on that video that when the guy syncs the iPhone over iTunes, it shows a total capacity of 80 GB??

    22. Re:Alternate Carriers by emc · · Score: 1

      Interesting, since the Nano was introduced in September 2005.

    23. Re:Alternate Carriers by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Ok, you're right. I hesitated for a moment. It was Christmas 2005.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    24. Re:Alternate Carriers by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      If this phone lasts 5 years, it could very well be the best made phone in existence. The contract only applies to the original iPhone, I doubt Jobs gave them exclusive access to iPhone v2.0 and iPhone Nano as well.
      Regards,
      Steve

    25. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the prices of the phone and plans, I think the steps listed above should be slightly different: In, Pay out the ass, Activate.

    26. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God Bless you-someone who realizes the Treo is a great phone. The problem is that it is not idiot proof, because it requires some thought to do what you want to do- whereas the iphone is setup that a 5 year old can do it. Treo users don't need to be treated as such!

    27. Re:Alternate Carriers by mattatwork · · Score: 1

      I saw that too while watching the video.... Apple employees probably have pimped out iPhones or better access and tools to upgrade their iPhones. The only thing holding me back from buying an iPhone is the fact that they only come with either a 4 or 8 Gb HD. My wife bought me a 60Gb iPod last year and there is no way I'm paying the price of a 60 or 80 Gb iPod to get the capacity of a 4 or 8 Gb Nano!

      --
      I've refrained from profanity, racial/ethnic epitaphs and am 5'11" - how can I be ranked as troll?
    28. Re:Alternate Carriers by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Was everyone? Huh? Where? This is the first time I've heard any such query. Interestingly, in the T-mobile store the activation process took a good two-and-a-half to three minutes for my phone.

    29. Re:Alternate Carriers by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      No, one cannot. Wherever you buy the phone, you're tied into at least a two, effectively a five year contract with AT&T. Lucky you.

    30. Re:Alternate Carriers by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Back Home! But I want to use my new 600 dollar phone, NOW!"

      I think they will be doing activations in the store. In may not be in their plan, but the first time someone reports up the chain that they lost a customer because they wanted the store to activate, things will change.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    31. Re:Alternate carriers by Mattintosh · · Score: 0, Troll

      I explicitly left out voice mail on my current cell phone account. It was $1.00 to add it, and I purposefully unchecked the box when I filled out the signup form. Reason: I don't want to be bothered dialing some retarded voice mail system to get someone's mostly-useless message. The phone itself registers missed calls; I'll call you back if/when I give a damn.

      So no big loss if I don't have visual voice mail (like I need to see you when you're rambling for an hour into a networked recording device). I'll be happy without any voice mail at all.

      We'll see if it can be unlocked, with or without voice mail. Just as long as the web stuff still works and the syncing with iTunes/Address Book/iCal/Mail works, I'm happy. Oh, and phone calls. But that should be a given.

    32. Re:Alternate Carriers by funkyloki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to clear up a point, AT&T will only give you the unlock code after one year of continued service, and in some cases, the rep will not have any idea what you are talking about or refuse to give you the code. In other cases, AT&T will email you the code, but this has taken up to a week to receive. They will in no way give you the code over the phone. ALWAYS ask for a supervisor when you call for unlock codes from AT&T. BTW, T-Mobile will give you the unlock code via email within 48 hours after 90 days of service. And to qualify, I sell phone services and equipment for all the major providers for the last three years. One of the issues I am having as an indirect retailer of AT&T is that I get paid an activation commission, but I have to do the activation. If I were able to sell this phone, I would have to sell it a non-subsidized price, in order to make anything on it, since the activation is done through iTunes. Just one more way for AT&T to squeeze out the little guy, which has been their MO since August 2005.

      --
      Scientists now say the future will be far more futuristic than originally believed
    33. Re:Alternate Carriers by unborracho · · Score: 1

      90 days? Try 730.

      --
      "You had this look that of an angel, it was such a bad disguise" --Dishwalla
    34. Re:Alternate Carriers by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      That can only mean that your store wasn't crowded. Two years ago, it took me about an hour to get my RAZR. Which I would gladly throw away if I could.

    35. Re:Alternate Carriers by MCSEBear · · Score: 1

      You can purchase an iPhone at AT&T or Apple. You do not have to pay for an AT&T plan at either place at the time of purchase. Then you go home and unlock the phone without using iTunes to sign up for an AT&T plan. Easy, no?

    36. Re:Alternate Carriers by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " I can browse a useful web, listen to streaming internet radio, watch TV via the EVDO network and my slingbox..."

      Can you elaborate or post links on how you stream tv via the slingbox to your cell phone? I have a Samsung A900, on sprintpcs....with vision, and I think that is EVDO. Wondering if I can somehow stream content to my cell phone from home.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:Alternate carriers by kchrist · · Score: 4, Informative

      So no big loss if I don't have visual voice mail (like I need to see you when you're rambling for an hour into a networked recording device).

      You misunderstand what "visual voicemail" is. It has nothing to do with video, but means that you can browse your voice mail messages visually via the phone interface, giving you random access to them rather than the sequential access you normally have. So people who keep all their voicemail can pick one out of the bunch by simply scrolling to it instead of whatever kludgy audio keypad-based navigation they normally have when they dial into their carrier's VM system.

    38. Re:Alternate Carriers by papageorgio02 · · Score: 1

      I too can stream to my MotoQ. The app is like $29 to purchase. Pretty cool toy! http://us.slingmedia.com/page/downloads.html

      --
      -- I stole your sig!
    39. Re:Alternate Carriers by ragefan · · Score: 4, Funny

      If this phone lasts 5 years, it could very well be the best made phone in existence. The contract only applies to the original iPhone, I doubt Jobs gave them exclusive access to iPhone v2.0 and iPhone Nano as well. I'm waiting for the iPhone Shuffle personally. The one w. no screen and just send & end buttons. Every time I press the send button, it randomly dials phone number on my contact list.
    40. Re:Alternate Carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ok, you're right. I hesitated for a moment. It was Christmas 2005.

      Glad to see you didn't succumb to the temptation and exchange a very disirable bit of electronics for something you actually did want; now you can smugly tell you're little snub story in its full glory! Do you also boast proudly of winning lottery tickets you refused to cash in before they expired?

    41. Re:Alternate Carriers by nolife · · Score: 1

      I was using Orb to stream tv and various streams to my Q (Verizon) from my home computer and it worked okay. It was not the best quality but it did work good for a zero cost streaming solution. I got rid of the Q for other reasons.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    42. Re:Alternate Carriers by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Very interesting!

      I wonder if there is an open source, linux based way to do this?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    43. Re:Alternate Carriers by DECS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm sorry but as a long time Treo user, I'll have to call you on your crap.

      The Treo was cool five years ago because it pioneered the idea of having a Palm PDA with a phone. It hasn't kept up, and Palm OS is creaky and needs a bullet in the head. Even Palm abandoned its own product to deliver a Windows Mobile version, which is actually less functional and more problematic.

      I hope the iPhone results in Palm closing down. It really deserves the failure it earned by dumping trash on its own customers.

      The Egregious Incompetence of Palm
      Windows Mobile, Palm OS, Linux, and Symbian currently power the world's smartphones. How does each stack up against Apple's OS X in the iPhone? This article presents an overview of Palm. Palm's early products actually followed a trajectory strikingly similar to Apple's original Macintosh. Differences in the choices made at Palm provide an interesting glimpse into "what if" scenarios of a parallel universe.

    44. Re:Alternate Carriers by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a phone? I said iPod.
      The parent (now grandparent) comment was talking about those who want the phone without the phone features. I was satirically illustrating that such a thing is called an iPod.

      --
      The following statement is true
      The preceding statement is false
    45. Re:Alternate carriers by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Ah. Thanks for clearing that up (rather than modding me Troll).

      Your description makes voicemail sound almost tolerable. It might be worth looking at, now that I know.

    46. Re:Alternate carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...reading your first (mistaken) post and the followup, I was wondering if you would realize that visual voicemail is meant to fix the exact problem you complained about. Thanks for admitting you were confused and that it IS a neat addition. Hopefully people will love it enough that other carriers and phones will start adding the same feature (the hell if I can afford a $600 phone and want to use Cingular's crappy network)

    47. Re:Alternate Carriers by nolifetillpleather · · Score: 0

      OMG stop telling this joke

    48. Re:Alternate Carriers by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      uh, no.

      Besides, my wife said it should be hers, so it isn't really mine anymore.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    49. Re:Alternate carriers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderation -1 Dumbass

    50. Re:Alternate Carriers by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Oh, THAT box. :-)

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
  2. Unlimited data, eh? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1, Interesting

    all include unlimited data If the phone calls will be running on voIP, which is *data*, then technically there should be no monthly limit on minutes. Who wants to be the first to try this out?
    1. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by eric2hill · · Score: 5, Informative

      What makes you think the iPhone will run voice calls over IP? It's a traditional GSM phone that uses EDGE data to provide additional services including the visual voicemail. But calls go over the traditional cellular network just like any other phone.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    2. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Utopia · · Score: 1

      Is there are an in-built app? I don't think you can do VoIP without an in-built application. Considering that this phone can only support webpages from externel providers.

    3. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at it from a purely technical point: right now even normal voice over a GSM phone is data. It's a digital phone, GSM is packet oriented. It sends purely digital data. Just like on ISDN...

      The difference is that the "voice" data has strict timing requirements, and some trade-offs were made to accomodate these requirements. Normal data networks have caught up, and that's why VoIP is possible these days.

    4. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ive run skype over a cell phone used as a modem and even with EVDO speeds the latency and dropped packets are pretty bad. I doubt EDGE will be much better and I'm certain plain-jane GSM will sound much, much better. I also wouldnt put it past cell phone providers to make sure that voip gets either blocked or the lowest priority on the data network end of things.

    5. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by jdrew77 · · Score: 2, Funny

      theres not a chance that a VOIP app could run over AT&T's network. The pipes are not fat enough.

    6. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by hypermanng · · Score: 1

      What do you mean GSM is packet oriented? Traditional GSM is connection oriented, assigning a TCH via multiframe only at call time.

      --
      I am the one true god. However, as an atheist, I don't believe in myself. I guess I have a self-esteem problem.
    7. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I mixed up terms. What I meant is that GSM uses data packets (just like TCP). It is evidently connection oriented, or your calls would end up to sound very weird. My point was that in the end it still are digital packets, not so much unlike TCP.

      Of course, each packet has its alloted time, which makes it different from TCP...

      My telco classes have been a while, I must admit.

    8. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital has little to do with TCP. It is digital for the purpose of transmitting fewer bits over the air. Traditional GSM voice goes over circuit switch domain at 9.6Kbps or 12.2Kbps(AMR) and not over packet.

    9. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, you wrote your signature in BASIC?

      SYS 64738

    10. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by StargateSteve · · Score: 1

      sure, but what about the first guy who figures out how to get skype to work? Yes, I know what Steve Jobs said about developer's abilities to write programs. (they just appear to be fancy scripts) But as soon as someone figures out how to hack the limitations out, then we can use some of that free bandwidth.

    11. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Raistlin77 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Actually VOIP works relatively well over 3G, but since the iPhone is only GSM/EDGE, there goes that possibility.

    12. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by iMacGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good luck finding an x86/PPC->ARM binary recompiler for Skype.app.
      Open-source apps might be portable, but Skype isn't, and isn't available for the architecture at all.

      --
      Why won't slashdot let me change my terrible username :(
    13. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Why bother? You HAVE to pay for AT&T no matter what. Look at the bottom of the page.. the iPhone won't function without a plan. You could cancel, pay the $175 cancellation fee.. and have a brick that won't even play music.

    14. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Skype does exist for the PocketPC, which includes the ARM architecture.

    15. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by mrbooze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How hard is it to make a VOIP application that works in Safari? If it works in Safari, it works on the iPhone, no?

    16. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by dr.badass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How hard is it to make a VOIP application that works in Safari?

      Without Flash or Java? I'd say pretty damn hard.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    17. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if it has quicktime and core*, I imagine not difficult at all. Remember all that hype about someone opening a quicktime video on a webpage that used coregraphics/quartz composer to show you your own webcam image? Just hook up some form of network output (quicktime broadcaster? I think the functionality is actually in quicktime itself..), and you're all set. I'm pretty sure the same concept can be applied to coreaudio in quicktime to make a simple phone app, but don't quote me on that.

    18. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by mrbooze · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But it's possible to use youtube, and the various google apps also supposedly work, no? What are they using?

    19. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this nifty thing called a "compiler"

    20. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Remember all that hype about someone opening a quicktime video on a webpage that used coregraphics/quartz composer to show you your own webcam image?

      I remember that being a really stupid hypefest that got spread around a bunch of forums by people that didn't have any idea how it works.

      Just hook up some form of network output

      You can't. It doesn't work that way. There is no "network output" from a QuickTime movie: it's a movie file, not an application.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    21. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      But it's possible to use youtube, and the various google apps also supposedly work, no?

      YouTube, as demonstrated, works by way of a custom application outside of Safari. Flash isn't involved at all. Also, I can't think of any Google apps that use Flash or Java. Google Maps is also included as a custom application outside of Safari, but I can't think of any particular reason why you couldn't use it on the web through Safari, as it is implemented with JavaScript/AJAX.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    22. Re:Unlimited data, eh? by Carthag · · Score: 1

      But what if you have QT continually open a series of URLs with the VOIP data encoded in the request headers!? That won't be laggy at all :D

  3. A few other notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    - iPhone DOES have a user-accessible SIM tray.

    - Since one would presume the iPod functionality of the device still needs to work when the contract expires, there is probably going to be a fairly easy hack/workaround to use only the iPod functionality (e.g., perhaps just a file sitting somewhere, a la .AppleSetupDone).

    - It will be interesting to see whether AT&T will unlock the phone on request, as they do for other GSM phones (for international travel and prepaid SIMs), and if that is the case, how well other carriers' networks work with iPhone (obviously sans things like Visual Voicemail).

    - Still no word on battery replacement specifics, but it seems safe to assume that iPhone is the same as iPod in this respect; namely, that it is sealed and that the battery isn't "user accessible", but that there will still be plenty of ways to replace the battery yourself or via third parties if you so choose (battery failure under warranty would be covered by the warranty). I'm going to be tracking this issue here.

    - Still no word on insurance or AppleCare, but since all iPods have AppleCare options ($59 for two years), iPhone probably will as well.

    - Two more days to determine this for certain, but it appears that if only the iPod/syncing functionality (or first time setup, anyway) is what is tied with iTunes activation, WiFi via the browser will probably work fine as-is without a contract. Note: it is not certain that this is the case, but it seems likely. (Just a point of information; not stating this as inconrtovertible fact. The only way this might not be the case is if the entire phone is just locked until activated, which seems unlikely.)

    - Also remains to be seen how "hackable" the phone is in general. Here's to hoping.

    1. Re:A few other notes by Hungus · · Score: 1

      I for one will be waiting for the 2nd generation iPhone. some rumour mills have it supporting GPS and some other goodies. If so, and the phone can be unlocked, w/o ATT service then I may well just stay with MetroPCS and use it to replace my dead newton. Oh and here's hoping that sqlite or something similar is in the build.

      --
      Bad Panda! No Bamboo for you! In matters of importance ACs will not be responded to. Want to say something critical,OK
    2. Re:A few other notes by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      one would presume the iPod functionality of the device still needs to work when the contract expires Maybe, maybe not. Remember, this isn't just an Apple product, it is an AT&T product as well.

      The only way this might not be the case is if the entire phone is just locked until activated, which seems unlikely. Unlikely for Apple, maybe, but I'll bet it's not at all unlikely for AT&T. Remember, AT&T has an exclusive deal to sell this thing, and they're going to want to enforce that. I really wish that Apple would have cut a deal with more than one mobile phone service. AT&T is not my ideal wireless company.

    3. Re:A few other notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I wouldn't be "surprised" by any of that; but I also wouldn't be surprised if there was a very easy (or "easy-for-the-savvy") workaround, even right out of the box. I mean, AppleTV is supposed to be an appliance, and look how hackable that is, or, for that matter, many of Apple's products. Of course this is a different game and AT&T is involved, but I'd bet there's an easy workaround to get everything set up and working on the iPhone with the exception of the phone functionality, unless a significant amount of effort was directed at preventing this (and they may have).

      As to your other point about after expiration, yes, AT&T and/or Apple may have played some games there too. But I'd assume that they wouldn't want to brick the phone when it's out of contract. One thing that's interesting to me is the backend processes Apple and AT&T must have built to support activation, billing, customer account information, etc., via iTunes. I don't imagine this will be a big issue for many people, because aside from the AT&T exclusivity, most ordinary people will get the phone and use it as, well, a phone, and talking about all of this kind of stuff is moot.

    4. Re:A few other notes by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, again, the issue is more with AT&T as a wireless carrier. I had them and their service was really crappy, at least where I lived at the time. Dropped calls, 'static', etc., despite all of their advertisements as having 'fewer dropped calls' than other carriers. If Apple went with a different carrier, I would get one of these in a minute. I've had good success with Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile ... AT&T, forget it. That's on top of the fact that they fully supported the illegal NSA wiretapping, which, in itself is unforgivable in my book.

    5. Re:A few other notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just transferred to Cingular (ATT), this plan gives me 900 minutes for $59/month,
      which is a lot less then what was quoted in this Slashdot header. Not only that, but I also purchased an extension of "free time" so I can use it free after 7 pm instead of 9 pm. I make MOST of my personal calls from 7 - 9 pm, so for me, this is best plan.

      Does this posting imply that in order to use Apple's iPhone, I have to get a WHOLE
      NEW (and much more expen$ive plan)? This totally sucks hog dung. Time to call some of my friends at Apple and get the straight scoop. Not that this posting is wrong or anything, but it didn't mention us people with existing plans.

      Does this mean that people with existing plans are going to have to pay MORE to use their iPhones?

      And this service plan is probably going to be necessary, as every new product is going to have small technical problems until they work out the bugs, but that plan is a bit on the high side.

      Watch out - Apple may be doing some really sneaky things in the future, and someone else posted something about "unlock codes". I highly doubt Apple is going to release them, but I'm guessing some hackers are eventually going to figure that out.

      As for working on other providers, they are using the Edge system, but that's not to say that is still going to make them compat with other providers.

      Being an attendee of the WWDC (Developers conference) a few weeks ago, I got all the down and dirty scoop on development of SW for it. It's ALL WEB... but I'm betting there is going to me some other ways of accessing it as well. Perhaps some sneaky way to get into a "shell" (after all, it's UNIX underneath). But it has Safari built into it, and programming it is all WEB, but you do have to pay attention to the touch screen, and the differences it has with using Mice or trackpad.

      If I find anything new on this, I'll post it here, but as a Developer, I have to respect the non-disclosure crapola Apple is forcing us to abide by. But if I come across info that doesn't specifically say "Apple Confidential" I can certainly share it.

    6. Re:A few other notes by TechnicolourSquirrel · · Score: 1

      - Two more days to determine this for certain, but it appears that if only the iPod/syncing functionality (or first time setup, anyway) is what is tied with iTunes activation, WiFi via the browser will probably work fine as-is without a contract. Note: it is not certain that this is the case, but it seems likely. (Just a point of information; not stating this as inconrtovertible fact. The only way this might not be the case is if the entire phone is just locked until activated, which seems unlikely.) *Only*? Why?! Because it's technically impossible to prevent someone from connecting to the internet unless you prevent them from accessing the machine at all? Where do you get this belief? Apple/AT&T *could* lock the entire phone until activated, or they could just lock Safari. Or, they could just lock the wifi stack itself. Or, they could just lock the preferences with which you would need to set up your wifi behaviour. Or, they could just lock you out of any and all access points. Or, they could do just about a hundred other things since they have the run of the device and can lock as much of it or as little of it as they want. So ... no. This isn't the only way this might happen, rendering your speculation that they will be forced by this nonexistent engineering hurdle to let you use wifi without activation, inoperative. In other words ... keep on dreamin'...
    7. Re:A few other notes by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "- Since one would presume the iPod functionality of the device still needs to work when the contract expires, there is probably going to be a fairly easy hack/workaround to use only the iPod functionality (e.g., perhaps just a file sitting somewhere, a la .AppleSetupDone)."

      Why would one presume this, Dave? It's a cellphone, and some cellphones refuse to power on without a working SIM card. It appears the iPhone may be one of those. So much for being an iPod with cellular capabilities, eh?

      "- It will be interesting to see whether AT&T will unlock the phone on request, as they do for other GSM phones (for international travel and prepaid SIMs), and if that is the case, how well other carriers' networks work with iPhone (obviously sans things like Visual Voicemail)."

      Haven't you already declared as fact that all this will work, Dave? I seem to have had this conversation before.

      "- Still no word on battery replacement specifics, but it seems safe to assume that iPhone is the same as iPod in this respect; namely, that it is sealed and that the battery isn't "user accessible", but that there will still be plenty of ways to replace the battery yourself or via third parties if you so choose (battery failure under warranty would be covered by the warranty)."

      Why would this be safe to assume, Dave? Are you so embarrassed by an Apple product's shortcomings that you have to continually make up excuses and assumptions? Why can't you leave this just as it is? No user replacable battery.

      "I'm going to be tracking this issue here."

      Why would you bother doing that? I thought you weren't a fanboy? It's amazing your singular dedication to one product and one company for someone who only cares about the objective facts.

      "WiFi via the browser will probably work fine as-is without a contract. Note: it is not certain that this is the case, but it seems likely."

      Why does this seem likely? Why are you so motivated to make assumptions about how this device will work? Why can't you just say that we don't know until it ships? The iPhone is locked to AT&T services. That's how it is until we know otherwise.

      "- Also remains to be seen how "hackable" the phone is in general. Here's to hoping."

      Just come out and say it, Dave. The iPhone will be everyone's dream machine.

    8. Re:A few other notes by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 1

      Well, I've heard from AT&T in the past that they're pretty amenable to upgrading phone plans near the end of the contract (if you just started the contract they may make you pay the early termination fee), but I've never tried it. I have about eight months left on my current contract, so we'll see...

      --
      -30-
    9. Re:A few other notes by timbck2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really wish that Apple would have cut a deal with more than one mobile phone service. AT&T is not my ideal wireless company.


      In the US, they only had two choices, if you make the assumption that Apple didn't want to manufacture different versions of the phone for different markets (GSM vs. CDMA): AT&T and T-Mobile. Those are the only two national GSM carriers.

      Once that's established, Apple really had no choice but to go with AT T-Mobile just isn't big enough, doesn't have the amount of coverage that AT&T has. I'm not happy about it either, because AT&T's service sucks in my area (northern New Mexico). Besides, I still have a year to go on my Verizon plan.
      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    10. Re:A few other notes by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative
      Does this posting imply that in order to use Apple's iPhone, I have to get a WHOLE NEW (and much more expen$ive plan)?

      From TFA: "In addition, iPhone customers can choose from any of AT&T's standard service plans."
      So it seems you can keep your current agreement.

    11. Re:A few other notes by fermion · · Score: 1

      My experience is that ATT does not insure new phones, at least phones in the iPhone price range. I assume we will still have applecare for warranty issues. Accidental stuff, that so often happens to a phone, will probably not have coverage. Which is why a one year contract is so necessary for this phone.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:A few other notes by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Well, attfs, you can choose any AT&T plan to go with your iPhone, but I think you'll find that the deal they're offering is better than the current crop of plans. Presuming this is classified as a pda-phone, then unlimited data alone will run you $40/mo. 200mms another $10. That's $50 plus your voice plan. Sure, you might game the system with a MediaMax plan for $20 to get the unlimited data + 200mms if you're lucky, but by the book it's pretty good. FWIW, if you're a big texter, there's a new plan that will extend any fixed mms plan to unlimited mms for $5. You can probably still buy the free time since it's just an add on.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    13. Re:A few other notes by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have read elsewhere that you can pay $20 a month to upgrade your voice plan to unlimited data for the iPhone.

      If you consider that for the somewhat similar HTC devices, they want $40/month for PDA data, and Blackberry plans are similarly expensive, the AT&T plan is excellent, actually a bit cheaper than I had dared to hope. I'd hoped for a realistic base price of $65 with unlimited data and similar numbers of voice minutes, and I was really expecting $75. As it happens, they undercut my most optimistic thoughts by $6. Not bad, not bad at all.

      D

    14. Re:A few other notes by gclef · · Score: 1

      AT&T's service sucks in every area.

      While I'm not a fan of T-Mobile (their handling of the Sidekick compromise while I had one was a major factor in my leaving them), I'd at least consider the iPhone if it were on T-Mobile. AT&T? Never.

    15. Re:A few other notes by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure he was wandering about migrating existing plans to the iPhone, not the cost of the iPhone plan. It sounds like he recently started a new contract with AT&T.

      --
      -30-
    16. Re:A few other notes by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Also remains to be seen how "hackable" the phone is in general. Here's to hoping.

      You want to steal from Apple? Or embarrass them by using an iPhone to damage AT&T's precious network? Isn't that counterrevolutionary?

    17. Re:A few other notes by cmeans · · Score: 1

      There's a reason AT&T wasn't the first carrier Apple tried to work a deal with. I'm reasonably sure Verizon Wireless was the first carrier, I and many, many other customers certainly consider it the best. They're not perfect, but they have the best overall coverage in the continental US and HI.

      It is indeed unfortunate for iPhone users that Apple and VW couldn't work out a deal, and I'm sure it's because VW wants control over the phone and capabilities (GetItNow definately puts a crimp in Bluetooth capabilities turned-on in VW phones). Apple wanted more control than VW wanted to give them, and VW doesn't need the bump that AT&T clearly does.

    18. Re:A few other notes by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Any ideas on number porting/straight-upgrades? TFA doesn't seem to help here, but (especially when it comes to the UK) I find my phone number kinda important and want to take it with me. Likewise, if Apple choose to go with T-Mobile as their provider (I reckon O2 are gonna get it) any word on if I'll be able to pay for the iPhone and just move my plan straight onto it?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    19. Re:A few other notes by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 1
      BTW: According to the iPhone Atlas notes on the activation video (which I can't watch until after work):
      • If you are already an AT&T customer, you can either replace your current cell phone line with the iPhone, or add the iPhone as a new line
      • If you are an existing AT&T customer, you keep your original voice plan and just need to "add the iPhone data plan"

      So you shouldn't need to shell out more cash to move over to an iPhone plan.
      --
      -30-
    20. Re:A few other notes by tmarthal · · Score: 1

      but I think you'll find that the deal they're offering is better than the current crop of plans.


      The only reason that most people will not update thier plans is that Cingular, at least in the past, resets your roll-over minutes when you update/change plans. Most people like me that have been on Cingular for more than a year have more than 3000 minutes saved up (basically unlimited) and the rate that I get roll-over minutes is the same as they are expiring [1:1, they expire after 12 months I believe]. I will always have 3000 minutes to use if there was ever a case in which I would need to use a lot a minutes a month, I won't get jacked. This is with a 450 minute/month plan.

      Now the SMS is where they jack me... maybe I will update my plan. :x
    21. Re:A few other notes by ashmon · · Score: 1

      My question is, "Why would you want to use this as an iPod replacement?"

      Seriously, you can get a regular Video iPod for less money that has more memory than this phone.

    22. Re:A few other notes by aztektum · · Score: 1

      You forget the point that Verizon declined to carry it. So pretty much they had 4 choices, Sprint, Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile in order to be "national". They started with the two biggest and just went down the list

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    23. Re:A few other notes by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Any ideas on number porting/straight-upgrades?

      In Apple's set-up demo video one of the screens deals with keeping your existing number. But that's all I know.

    24. Re:A few other notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 2nd paragraph was confusing at first because VW is usually associated by most people with Volkswagen.

    25. Re:A few other notes by ksheff · · Score: 1

      According to this: http://www.apple.com/iphone/easysetup/rateplans.ht ml , if you want to move an existing plan to the iPhone and get unlimited data & the visual voice mail, it's at least another $20/month.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    26. Re:A few other notes by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      These aren't notes, Dave, they're speculation.

      and if that is the case, how well other carriers' networks work with iPhone (obviously sans things like Visual Voicemail).

      Why would it function any differently (sans VVM)? Contrary to the spin, there are no modifications to the network to magically do anything for the iPhone in this regard. It's a GSM device.

      What /will/ be interesting is whether the phone is tri-band/quad-band, etc, so whether it is even usable outside the US.

    27. Re:A few other notes by Angostura · · Score: 1

      If you have a look at the video reference above, you will see that the iTunes-based activation includes a nice checkbox to click if you want to port another number.

    28. Re:A few other notes by kchrist · · Score: 1
      That's been known since day one:

      GSM Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)

      From http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html
    29. Re:A few other notes by Penguin's+Advocate · · Score: 1

      Same reason you'd buy the Nano (ie the reason I own a Nano). You're way too paranoid to carry around something with a harddrive in it, so solid state is the only option. Sure you're limited in size, but that's the price you pay for not trusting tiny spinning discs.

      --
      Frag 'em all...
    30. Re:A few other notes by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      The iPhone will be everyone's dream machine.
      Not Taco's dream machine! In his immortal words:

      No AT&T-less. Less space than an iPod. Lame.
    31. Re:A few other notes by dwater · · Score: 1

      > These aren't notes, Dave, they're speculation.

      Are you saying notes cannot be speculative? That's a strange idea.

      --
      Max.
    32. Re:A few other notes by dwater · · Score: 1

      > The iPhone is locked to AT&T services. That's how it is until we know otherwise.

      Actually, I'd suggest that we don't even know that.

      Until it actually ships, it is all speculation. IMO, there's nothing wrong with speculating, especially when so many seem so interested in it.

      Why do you have a problem with speculation on this issue? Too much noise for you? I can understand that. I'm fairly sure I won't be buying an iPhone, but I might just be able to stretch to a Nokia N95, which doesn't have the flash UI that the iPhone is touting, but it has everything else (except, perhaps, this voice mail thing) and it doesn't have (m)any of the disadvantages either - here are some (Apple Mac vs PC ad spoof):

      http://darlamack.blogs.com/darlamack/2007/06/n95-v s-iphone--.html
      http://darlamack.blogs.com/darlamack/2007/06/n95-v s-iphone-1.html

      I might be more interested in the second version, but time will tell.

      --
      Max.
    33. Re:A few other notes by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Well, we know it to the extent that Apple is presenting it in that manner. You could argue that we don't even know if there WILL be an iPhone since all we have is what Apple says.

      I don't have any problem with speculation. I have a problem with a poster who slaps down speculation of others, claims to be the champion of facts, then offers his own speculation as fact. If he wants to discuss what is truly known, then his own imaginings deserve the same fate.

      As an example, he had a cow when it was speculated that the iPhone didn't have a SIM slot. Then, when pictures indicating the likely location of a SIM slot surfaced, he announced that the device did, in fact, have a user-accessible SIM slot. He doesn't actually "know" it's user-accessible or that it's actually the SIM slot, he just makes assumptions into fact. Yesterday Apple released details of the iTunes activation and it is now believed that the SIM card is not changable. We don't know any of this until we can get one, but it is an example of his double standard.

      I like iPhone speculation, what I don't like is obvious bias.

    34. Re:A few other notes by dwater · · Score: 1

      > I like iPhone speculation, what I don't like is obvious bias.

      Yes. It is distasteful.

      --
      Max.
  4. Yes but by snowwrestler · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the iPhone?

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Yes but by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

      I believe it's time for Poochie to become the iPhone's mascot.

    2. Re:Yes but by feepness · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the saying go:

      Light a man a fire, and he's warm for one night. Light a man afire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.

      It's clever because it sounds exactly the same.

    3. Re:Yes but by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

      Never heard it put that way, actually. That is pretty clever.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  5. Unlimited Data. by Silas+Palmer-Cannon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some carriers define "unlimited data" as some arbitrary level, which once you break you either lose service, or are charged a hefty fee. Just something to keep in mind.

    1. Re:Unlimited Data. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Some carriers define "unlimited data" as some arbitrary level, which once you break you either lose service, or are charged a hefty fee. Just something to keep in mind.
      Yeaaah, so does anyone have any hard data on what Cingular's track record was on unlimited use of their unlimited data plan was so as to be a predictor of how The New AT&T will define abuse of their unlimited data plan?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Unlimited Data. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      With those prices, a two year contract, and unsubsidized handsets, AT&T had better not be playing any of the usual telco tricks with the definition of "unlimited".

    3. Re:Unlimited Data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone ever sued for breach-of-contract over this?

    4. Re:Unlimited Data. by k_187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless there's someway to tether the iphone to a laptop and use it as a modem or something, I highly doubt that you'd use enough bandwitdth for them to think about turning you off.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    5. Re:Unlimited Data. by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Defining "unlimited data" should be easy:

      Maximum transfer rate per second * 60 seconds * 60 minutes * 24 hours * 31 days.

      That should give you your monthly limit.

      Anything below that should be called "limited".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Unlimited Data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to use my Blackjack as a tethered modem on the 3G network for nearly a month in April while Comcast was up to their regular shenanigans... No increase on my bill, no "hefty fee", no termination of service...

    7. Re:Unlimited Data. by cyngus · · Score: 1

      I think you're forgetting the other company involved here: Apple. They're not going to allow any trickery, that is obscenely bad user experience. I'm sure Jobs nipped any such sneakiness early on.

    8. Re:Unlimited Data. by cyngus · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/leg al/plan-terms.jsp contains the usual cellular crap language. Basically, you can't use it for video, movies, music, aka "any service we'd like to gouge you for because we don't believe in net neutrality." I suspect that this clause is legally unenforceable and eventually a suit will go forward on this. It seems like if you ran a VPN (which is allowed) that handled all your traffic, they wouldn't be able to discern the type of data you were transferring. Bits are bits GD it!

    9. Re:Unlimited Data. by Phu5ion · · Score: 1

      So the whole thing about having youTube on the iPhone is blowing smoke up our ass?

      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
    10. Re:Unlimited Data. by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Compared to Rogers' and Fido's prices in Canada ($5/mo for 2MB of transfer, $30 per additional megabyte), I'll take an arbitrarily limited 'unlimited' plan. I hope that part of Apple's deal with Rogers involves a data plan that doesn't try to fuck customers over like Rogers seems keen on doing.

    11. Re:Unlimited Data. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      No, but there are anecdotal tales of service issues with people who use an extraordinary amount of data. Cincular has stratitifed its plans based on the device type, so the unlimited has a different cost for phones, smartphones, pdas without qwerty keyboards, pdas with qwerty keyboards, and tethered devices. The presumption is that as you go up the ladder you are likely to use more data in an all-you-can-eat scenereo.

      If you significantly exceed their expected level for your device type, they may address it some way (termination, fee increase). I have a qwerty pda phone (htc hermes) and talked my way into the smartphone-only MediaMax. It means I go through a NAT instead of direct so email is harder (though I don't use mobile email), but the service is basically the same. I'm not in 3G land, and I don't surf much, so I'll probably use less b/w than most active smartphone users. I haven't figured out the tehtering with my laptop yet, wo that may change things, but it's still rare that I'd be somewhere with my laptop but without access to wifi.

      I'm guessing that iPhone users who buy from iTMS will send a small cut of the price to AT&T, so as long as you keep buying stuff, AT&T will be happy.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    12. Re:Unlimited Data. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We will see. The IPhone+Youtube popularity might (finally) create enough of a consumer backlash that the telecos backoff. Then again, they are the telecos so maybe not.

    13. Re:Unlimited Data. by MatchbooksAndSarcasm · · Score: 4, Informative

      I had verizon's 'unlimited' plan a while ago, and took it to be just that. After a month of remote desktoping, music and video dl-ing (some of which was even legal), I found that my service wasn't working anymore. I called Verizon, who told me that they'd detected abuse, based on the fact that I'd gone over the usage limit (that I hadn't been told about) on my 'unlimited' account, and they summarily canceled my service. At least they let me return the PC access card (still burned me with the restocking free, though). I'm on AT$T's 'unlimited' plan now, but since I just use it with my blackberry, I can't imagine I'm in danger of going over. But, I bet their 'unlimited' plan is just like verizons....quite limited.

    14. Re:Unlimited Data. by jubei · · Score: 1

      You don't think that watching YouTube or streaming music all day would would raise a flag?

    15. Re:Unlimited Data. by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      If they are only charging $20 per month for data, I'm sure you won't be able to tether your laptop on that rate plan (or, if you do tether it, they will start charging per KB--this is what Cingular has done in the past)... I wonder if they are still applying (very noticeable) compression to picture files on the Cingular/AT&T side of the network--they used to do this, too.

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    16. Re:Unlimited Data. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I was looking into Verizon's 'unlimited' plan, and if you read the fine print, they say that anything over 3GB/month will be viewed as abuse.

    17. Re:Unlimited Data. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      With the GSM modem in the iPhone? I'll stick to my HSPDA speeds thanks.

    18. Re:Unlimited Data. by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      You know, I think we got our answer on the whole "why no video-cap" question. The way things are set up with the camera, I take a picture and I can send it. That's not too terrible datawise. Now, if I start shooting video - even short video - and sending that over AT&T's network that'd probably cause them to have kittens.

      I wouldn't mind being able to bluetooth it off later, but I think AT&T didn't want Apple users wondering why one video transfer option was available and not another. Best not to "go there" - even if the plan is "unlimited".

      I think we found the limit.

  6. iPod functionality by Poromenos1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand the part about users "only wanting the iPod functionality of the iPhone". Why not just buy an iPod then?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:iPod functionality by Goaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bigger screen for video.

    2. Re:iPod functionality by matthew.thompson · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because there isn't an iPod with 3.5" touchscreen?

      It's a great looking iPod and I'd be tempted if it were a little cheaper even with just 8Gb. But I live in the UK so we're not going to see it until Christmas anyway.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    3. Re:iPod functionality by adamstew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bigger and widescreen screen with the multitouch interface. If apple made a version of the iPod in the iPhone form factor (basically, an iPhone without the phone) and charged $100 less for it, i'm sure they could make a good bit. Put a hard drive in place of the phone circuitry, and you have a sure fire winner.

    4. Re:iPod functionality by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the part about users "only wanting the iPod functionality of the iPhone". Why not just buy an iPod then? iPhone has a much larger screen and a better experience for video than a video iPod. It also has cover flow which the video iPod doesn't have. And less storage :-(
      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:iPod functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, there isn't a ton of screen add-ons for the ipod that still makes the 80gig ipod and the larger (much larger than the iphone, in some cases) cheaper then the iphone.
       
      another bullshit argument debunked.
       
      NEXT!

    6. Re:iPod functionality by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      The iPhone has a larger screen that is touch-sensitive, and can handle widescreen formats beautifully (automatically senses the orientation of the screen). You would assume it would have longer battery life than a regular iPod if you do not use the phone/wireless functionality at all.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    7. Re:iPod functionality by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      If apple made a version of the iPod in the iPhone form factor (basically, an iPhone without the phone) and charged $100 less for it, i'm sure they could make a good bit. Put a hard drive in place of the phone circuitry, and you have a sure fire winner.

      Now THIS would have my attention. I don't need a new phone, but would LOVE an iPod with the iPhone screen/touch interface and large iPod capacity (40/60/80/100GB). I'd be all in on that one. Hell yeah.

      Cheers.

      --
      Mark
    8. Re:iPod functionality by mcwop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like one to use as a web browsing device (using WiFi, and not the cell network). Basically a slick alternative to the Nokia N800.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    9. Re:iPod functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That orientation shit is going to suck. I use my iPod video in bed alot laying on my side because of a bad back. I hope there is a manual override for people like me.

    10. Re:iPod functionality by Goaway · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      another bullshit argument debunked.

      What is this, some kind of pissing contest? Does your penis grow bigger for every "argument" you "debunk" on the internet, never mind if it even was an "argument" in the first place?

      What exactly did you "debunk"? Are you saying that since there are screen add-ons for the iPod, no person will ever buy an iPhone just to get a bigger screen to watch video on, ever?

    11. Re:iPod functionality by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      or even better a "Flip Axis" button so that things work in reverse.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    12. Re:iPod functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the part about users "only wanting the iPod functionality of the iPhone". Why not just buy an iPod then?


      I'd bet a dime to a donut that Apple is delaying rolling out a touch-screen iPhone-style iPod until they've gotten a chance to push the iPhone into the hands of as many of the iPod faithful as possible. Once the hype dies down a little and iPhones stop flying off the shelves then we'll see the iPod design update.

    13. Re:iPod functionality by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Too bad there's only 8GB for the video content then, eh?

      8GB and 3.5" for $600. There's a lot better options than that.

    14. Re:iPod functionality by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      Something tells me this is what the next gen of ipods will be like. In fact, i wouldn't be surprised if they put out a non-cell version of the ipod, but kept all of the wifi and internet browsing capability. Sell that for $399, and hot damn, you've got yourself a winner.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    15. Re:iPod functionality by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yes, too bad. Didn't say I was buying one.

      Neither am I interested in any spec-list "better options", either.

    16. Re:iPod functionality by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Because there isn't an iPod with 3.5" touchscreen?

      Is that enough to make it better than the existing offering, though?

      An 80GB iPod, for example, may have a smaller screen and a clickwheel, but it also offers TEN times the capacity as the iPhone for a little more than HALF the price. I don't see the core value of the iPhone being in its music/video playing abilities.

    17. Re:iPod functionality by allanc · · Score: 1

      I think it was more "Only wanting the widescreen iPod running OSX with WiFi and Bluetooth support, allowing me to use it as a tiny Internet tablet anywhere there's an access point" than "Only wanting iPod functionality"

    18. Re:iPod functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So an Archos, then?

    19. Re:iPod functionality by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Because there isn't an iPod with 3.5" touchscreen? Just wait. Soon enough, there will be.

      This goes to my whole theory about the iPhone. It's basically a big marketing push to convince people that their current iPod is crap so when the next gen comes around you'll decide it's like an iPhone but cheaper.
    20. Re:iPod functionality by monopole · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have one. It's called the Palm TX running TCMP. It also has the google maps and browser capability. And 3rd party apps, and GPS.

    21. Re:iPod functionality by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind a non-wireless PDA that plays music, takes pictures, lets me read and compose emails that send/receive when I sync to my Mac (or within WiFi areas), watch movies, hold my contacts, etc. My cell phone is my work phone and I really don't want to be carrying around an additional phone line, but I wouldn't mind being wired in all the other ways the way iPhone allows.

      Maybe I could store a few pdf's and stuff on there too.

      I would love an iPhone that is everything but the phone, for a bit less money and no contract.

    22. Re:iPod functionality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screen magnifiers. Whoopee. Because that really increases the size/resolution/sharpness. Twat.

    23. Re:iPod functionality by amper · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that the sixth-gen iPod is going to essentially be an iPhone minus the cellular radio. Unfortunately, the earliest we will see such a creature is probably Macworld San Francisco 2008, because Apple will want to keep this holiday season for the iPhone.

  7. Living in europe sucks by Elsapotk421 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to buy one...I'm still using my Motorla slvr. It's a nice phone but the iPone had me at ...well it just had me...unlimited data sounds pretty good :). The plans I will admit are a little pricey.

    --
    We came,we saw, we kicked it's ass!
    1. Re:Living in europe sucks by pete.com · · Score: 0

      Not pricey for the US. AT&T Charges 89.00 for 1400 minute plans, unlimited data is like another 50.00.

      I saw 1350 minutes, 200 sms messages, with unlimted data for 99.00 a month and thought why is it so cheap?

    2. Re:Living in europe sucks by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      The plans I will admit are a little pricey.

      Ya think? Also bear in mind the agreement that the carriers will not subsidize the phone. So you're looking at a phone for $500-$600 and plans at $70-$100/month. Amortize the cost of the phone over 2-3 years and you're looking at something like $100-$150/month (plus taxes) for cell service. Ouch. Not for me!

  8. Alternate carriers by Diordna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (It will remain to be seen whether there are workarounds for this for those who only want the iPod functionality of iPhone, and whether the iPhone is easily unlockable for those who wish to try it on alternate carriers, and so on.)

    Apparently, Apple had to make AT&T make changes to the voicemail system to accommodate some nifty features, so if you switched carriers, you might lose voicemail.

  9. Re:For the Love of Money by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice slashvertisement there, Dave.

    So, people aren't interested in this?

    Ooookayyyy...

    You want me to spend a minimum of $59.99/mo. + $499 for an iPhone?

    No, I don't "want" anyone to do anything, other than know that plans have been released for iPhone.

    Which is what a lot of people have been waiting for.

    Which is why I submitted the story.

    What else can you expect from a fat cat sconnie who prides himself on the BMWs he's owned and lists his top 'interest' as Apple?

    Sorry I didn't submit as AC. Maybe I will next time to please you! And "fat can sconnie". Heh.

    Also, I must deeply apologize for being interested in Apple. I know it's a rare ailment, and that it must offend you greatly. I'm almost shedding a tear!

  10. Unlimited Data Transfer, eh? by ronadams · · Score: 0, Troll

    Imagine a mobile Beowulf Cluster of these...

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  11. Plans are not cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These plans are way overprized, but then again if you can afford this phone you can probably afford the plan (for 2 years minimum).
    Same goes with a Hummer or a Porsche, if you can't afford the gas why bother buying the car

    http://dotnetsamplechapters.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:Plans are not cheap by ryanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's actually not expensive -- I was surprised to see how low they were. Verizon's 900 minute plan is $99, and the cost of a Treo is really not a lot less than the cost of an iPhone (I think it might be more). When I had T-Mobile and a Treo 650, I was happy with the price I was getting (though it included WiFi in Starbucks and wherever else they controlled WiFi), and I was paying $58 for 300 mins and unlimited data. It would not surprise me to find out that these plans are cheaper than other unlimted data plans that AT&T offers.

    2. Re:Plans are not cheap by sydney094 · · Score: 1

      Or, it's an extra $20 on top of your current voice plan. For me, the extra $20/mo is worth it. I'd go so far as to say that the plans are actually quite reasonable, since they include voice and data.

      --
      "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research." - Einstein
    3. Re:Plans are not cheap by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      I haven't looked at the details but the plans don't seem to be anything new. I have a RAZR with AT&T right now and pay $39.99 for (I think) 450 minutes per month. There are some night & weekend minutes in there somewhere. I added $19.99 per month for unlimited data. Here in the US midwest this is the least expensive route to have a reasonable number of voice minutes combined with unlimited data.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    4. Re:Plans are not cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the cost of a Treo is really not a lot less than the cost of an iPhone

      There's where you're plain wrong. When I got my Treo, with a two year contract, I was given a mail-in rebate. The total cost was a mere $100 after rebate. With the iPhone you have to pay the full cost of the phone, with no discount for signing up for service.

    5. Re:Plans are not cheap by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      Actually, Sprint offers unlimited data, 500 minutes, nights n weekends (nights start at 7) and mobile to mobile calling for $30. This is however under the SERO plan which no one's heard of. http://www.sprint.com/sero (I think it is open to everyone now... just google for the current email address they want you to use)

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    6. Re:Plans are not cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD. verizon's does't offer a 900 minute plan for smartphone. but the 1350 plan is 110 usd and part of that price is a real e-mail service, not a web mail service. if you want to get right down to it the kind of "data" plan that at&t is offering with the iphone is more like a verizon voice plan with internet access which is much less then what ryanov is claiming.
       
      anyone who modded this up is a fanboy.

    7. Re:Plans are not cheap by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Rebates do not count. I am not eligible for any rebates at all, being on a corporate plan. Many people are also ineligible for other reasons (current customer without a lot of time on their plan). I'm talking dollar for dollar without giveaways.

    8. Re:Plans are not cheap by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you only want 200 SMS messages. On T-mobile, $20 gets you unlimited text and data. Here, you have to pay $40 for that. I guess these rates seem reasonable until you compare them to others, but if you think that unlimited SMS for a $20 upcharge is reasonable then you are crazy.

    9. Re:Plans are not cheap by metamatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the iPhone plan is exactly the same as AT&T's regular price plans, to within a few pennies.

      iPhone plan = 450 minute $39.99 voice plan plus $19.99 unlimited data smart phone plan with e-mail.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    10. Re:Plans are not cheap by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      Not including a mail-in rebate, also from AT&T, a Palm Treo 680 is $299 and a Treo 750 is $399.

    11. Re:Plans are not cheap by ryanov · · Score: 1

      For my carrier, Verizon, there is no low-cost Palm phone. It's a tough comparison to be making -- so, yes, with AT&T it's quite possible that an iPhone is more money than the available Treo options. My Treo 700p was something like $500, though, and I'm pretty sure that that is about what it costs now. As far as the 750 is concerned, yeah, it may be cheaper than the iPhone, but not by a lot. If it were an order of magnitude more expensive, I could see saying something, but no two phones are going to cost exactly the same price.

    12. Re:Plans are not cheap by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Do you wanna see my bill, jackass? The plan I have is America's Choice II, and it's listed as having 900 minutes. Apparently, it is not offered now, but I'm on a 2-year contract. For more information:

      http://www.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=3 0042

      Or look at any of the internet listings for America's Choice 900. Anyone who modded YOU up must not have heard me when I said that I HAVE this plan.

    13. Re:Plans are not cheap by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      It's in line with Apple's strategy in the computer market - the price is reasonable for what you get, but they don't sell into the low end.

      The pricing may not be an order of magnitude cheaper, but then again it doesn't need to be. A Toyota doesn't have to be an order of magnitude cheaper than a Lexus to have greater mass market appeal. For most people a $500 phone is extravagent, especially contrasted against much cheaper options - $180 for a Blackjack, $250 for a Blackberry, $300 for a Palm Treo, $400 for a Windows Treo. And regardless of whether you personally count rebates or not they make the difference between settling for a traditional flip phone and splurging on a smartphone.

      As an earlier response pointed out, it's entirely possible to get a Treo for $100. AT&T is running that deal right now on the 680.

      That's not to say I have anything against the iPhone. It's hard to predict how it will do though. The price is high. There's only a single carrier. They lack 3G capability. They lack GPS/aGPS. A significant segment of their potential market is already under contract, thereby inflating the effective cost of acquisition. Blah blah blah et cetera.

      On the other hand, it's a sexy looking device and Apple has a hell of a strong brand. The same could be said of Sony though, so only time will really tell.

    14. Re:Plans are not cheap by ryanov · · Score: 1

      What bugs me more than anything is the lack of choice, and my father tells me that this is the way wall phones were at one time until someone stepped in and regulated against it. I don't know why there shouldn't be comparable phones from each carrier. I also don't know why I should not be able to get the same price as a business as I can as an individual. I understand the technical differences between CDMA and GSM, but it seems ridiculous otherwise that this sort of foolishness should be allowed to take place. Really, that's why it's so hard to compare. I have Verizon -- there is no cheap Palm for Verizon. To me, the iPhone is not so expensive, because from my carrier there is no cheap alternative. Then again, I couldn't have an iPhone anyway, so really it is irrelevant to me.

  12. AT&T? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The plans are $59.99/mo for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes, and $99.99 for 1350 minutes,"

    Man, it sure is expensive these days to get illegally wiretapped.

  13. Re:For the Love of Money by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dave, seriously. You are being trolled. Don't egg them on or they'll keep pestering you.

  14. Plans starting at $60/month by oxidiser · · Score: 0

    $500 for the cheapest iphone, $60/month for the cheapest plan... I'm going to have to get a second job.

    1. Re:Plans starting at $60/month by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      $500 for the cheapest iphone, $60/month for the cheapest plan... I'm going to have to get a second job.

      Yeah, it's well out of my price range as well. No way in hell I'll be getting one. But $60/month doesn't sound all that bad when you consider it has unlimited data. Data can get very expensive, very quickly.
      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  15. Re:For the Love of Money by aicrules · · Score: 1

    Are you a cell phone salesman? If not, I don't get what this guy's issue is with you submitting the story. If you are then whoopideedo, not like any vendor will sell different, better/worse plans than you. Waaaait...are you an Apple and/or AT&T exec? If so, then I totally agree with his response!

  16. Family Plan Pricing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says, "Family plans are also available."

    So how much are they?!

    1. Re:Family Plan Pricing? by plazman30 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you actually went to the web site, you could click on the really big 'Family Plan' tab right there at the top of the page.... Andy

    2. Re:Family Plan Pricing? by burndive · · Score: 1

      I must be blind. To which web site, specifically, do you refer? I would find this information useful, as I already have a Cingular family plan.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    3. Re:Family Plan Pricing? by burndive · · Score: 1
      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    4. Re:Family Plan Pricing? by plazman30 · · Score: 1

      I am sorry for the insult. I got this URL from digg.com and thought it was from Slashdot. The following link lists all the service plans:

      http://www.apple.com/iphone/easysetup/rateplans.ht ml

      Andy

  17. A few MORE notes by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0, Troll

    -Dave Schroeder found a great opportunity to nab some karma.

    -Slashdot is partly an advertisement site, as nothing else can explain this "story". Remind me how many other advertisers get to have every new detail about upcoming products made into a /. story?

    -Dave Schroeder has a deep, abiding fear of using "the".

    1. Re:A few MORE notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dave Schroeder found a great opportunity to nab some karma. Isn't that why we are all here?

      Remind me how many other advertisers get to have every new detail about upcoming products made into a /. story? They don't 'get to have' that, they pay for it. As I recall the first obvious one was bought by the band They Might be Giants, and things have kind of taken off from there. Microsoft has bought a few. Ubuntu certainly has. The Ruby on Rails people were buying them one after another but have slowed down some.

      Anyway, it is part of the site. Like it or leave.

      Dave Schroeder has a deep, abiding fear of using "the". Only with regard to the iPhone. Note 'the' appears before 'iPod' in his post. It seems that he had developed a more personal connection (pun intended) with iPhone than with his iPod. Like one would with a household pet.
    2. Re:A few MORE notes by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry about it man,
      They wouldn't understand "change" if it bit them in the ass.

      So they take it out on the people who happen to see the big picture.

      btw. I see that the new "chocolate" phone (coming out shortly, I guess) from one of the other carriers will now start supporting transfer of music from the computer onto the phone. Where did they get that idea, and how did they ever find engineers that could accomplish such an amazing feat? And only a dozen months after they released their original music playing phone!

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:A few MORE notes by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I apologize for posting something that others considered informative, and will refrain from doing so in the future.

      Fat chance.

      ;)

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    4. Re:A few MORE notes by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0, Troll

      My karma is already excellent,

      So? Some people need to build up karma buffers for when they want to criticize sacred cows. I would know. Nothing wrong with building up karma of course, but there's a reason they call them "karma whores".

      If you're talking about my post, it contains more detailed information that wasn't appropriate for the submission.

      Right, because there has never been a story that had a "read the remaining 28084 bytes" on it.

      I apologize for posting something that others considered informative, and will refrain from doing so in the future.

      Strawman. The problem wasn't that you posted something informative, but that you intentionally delayed it for a vanity/karma post. It's not something you necessarily should apologize for, but intentionally withholding information from the original posting -- that most people will read -- so you can post it later and get karma, is sleazy.

      This has been one of the most anticipated pieces of information dealing with a product which has dominated this any many other news sites. I fail to see how it isn't a valid piece of information that many people were curious about.

      Yes, it's anticipated because some sites hype it up. As an advertiser I would love for my product to have this kind of free promotion. It necessarily has a network affect whereby hype generates hype.

      Wow, now that one stings! It's almost like you found something factually incorrect with the content of the submission!

      I'm just saying, maybe work on including definite articles in your writing?

    5. Re:A few MORE notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So? Some people need to build up karma buffers for when they want to criticize sacred cows. I would know. Nothing wrong with building up karma of course, but there's a reason they call them "karma whores".

      Again, since the karma index maxes out, and I'm (probably) already at the max, why do I need more karma, again? If you can explain that, I'd be grateful.

      Right, because there has never been a story that had a "read the remaining 28084 bytes" on it.

      I wasn't writing a book review or a journal entry; that information is superfluous to the main point of the submission, which is that Apple and AT&T finally released information on plans.

      Strawman. The problem wasn't that you posted something informative, but that you intentionally delayed it for a vanity/karma post. It's not something you necessarily should apologize for, but intentionally withholding information from the original posting -- that most people will read -- so you can post it later and get karma, is sleazy.

      All of your arguments seem to be based on you thinking I'm trying to "get karma" for the purpose of "criticizing sacred cows". If my karma is at the maximum, why do I need more karma? In other words, maybe I just posted because I actually wanted to, and the reasons why I said I posted it in my response to you are accurate on their face? Not everyone who posts things that get modded up quickly are "karma whores".

      And if you want to bring logical fallacies into it, yours is one of

      Yes, it's anticipated because some sites hype it up. As an advertiser I would love for my product to have this kind of free promotion. It necessarily has a network affect whereby hype generates hype.

      Well, since this has been my first and only submission about anything related to this on this site or any other (other than the occasional traditional discussion forum), I fail to see how it's my fault that this submission itself was anticipated. I don't care how much hype there is, and if Apple and AT&T purposely delayed releasing the plans for hype value, or if they really just finalized them hours before the press release: it's still a piece of information people want to know, and again, I fail to see how it's inappropriate for slashdot.

      If you're speaking to the larger point, yes, Apple works the system very adeptly. They get millions of dollars in free advertising (TIME covers, etc.) by managing the hype machine well. That doesn't change the fact that iPhone plans were a much anticipated piece of information. If you want to argue that posting them is "part of the problem", sure, I guess I'd agree with that, but no matter the reasons for the plans being highly anticipated, it still stands that they were. And therefore, the release of the plan information is noteworthy.

      I'm just saying, maybe work on including definite articles in your writing?

      Assuming you're being serious about my grammar for a moment...

      It's appropriate to refer to many branded products such as iPhone as "iPhone" or "the iPhone", and I specifically choose to use the former. Some people take issue with others doing it because "that's what Steve Jobs does" (calls it "iPhone" instead of "the iPhone"). But, even that actually has some merit...if that's how the vendor itself refers to the product, I don't see the problem with referring to it as such. It doesn't give it any more credence or do anything for them whatsoever by calling it "iPhone" vs. "the iPhone".

    6. Re:A few MORE notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      And if you want to bring logical fallacies into it, yours is one of

      Oops, slashdot didn't the symbols I included around the text that followed.

      That should read:

      And if you want to bring logical fallacies into it, yours is one of, "All A are in B. Therefore, all B must be in A."

    7. Re:A few MORE notes by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the clarification. Now, for the hard part: define A and B, and say where I made such a statement.

    8. Re:A few MORE notes by norminator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      intentionally withholding information from the original posting -- that most people will read -- so you can post it later and get karma, is sleazy.

      Sleazy? What a strange word to use here. I think you overestimate the importance of Slashdot karma... and probably of Slashdot in general. Most of us like to browse Slashdot, looking for some interesting news, and partake in the discussions. Karma helps us get our points across, but for most of us, it's not the end of the world if we lose some now and again. In any case, it's pretty judgmental to assume that dave is preparing to launch an assault on some Slashdot sacred cow, and he doesn't have any links in his posts (in a sig or in the header) to a commercial site or blog, only his webpage at his school, so he's not making money off of people reading his posts.

      Let's all take a break from our computers now and step outside for some fresh air.
    9. Re:A few MORE notes by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Since karma maxes out, and I'm likely already at that point (since from what I can tell it's pretty low), it's not something I exactly care about when posting.

      Back when it used to give you the actual number it would max out at 50. Assuming that hasn't changed, then you're right, it's not very hard to achieve.
      (Any mods above 50, by the way, were discarded, so it was (is?) possible to have a mostly positively moderated comment actually reduce your karma.)

    10. Re:A few MORE notes by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I think we should forgive him for these... atrocities of posting under his own stories. Simply because he did not plug his own website where he plans to track the info regarding the iPhone. But, you're right. Nobody's buying this:

      I apologize for posting something that others considered informative, and will refrain from doing so in the future.
      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    11. Re:A few MORE notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      IF a) I believe your karma index has maxed out and IF b) Slashcode is transparent enough that it does what they claim it does (!), and IF c) you have control over when a topic comes up where you're going to say something unpopular, THEN you have nothing to gain from karma whoring.

      However, a) I don't, b) it isn't, and c) you don't.


      Ok, so, out of all this, you still think I posted to karma whore. It is my firm belief that my karma was already maxed out when I posted that. It is irrelevant whether I can "prove" to you that it was maxed out, or whether slashdot's code is transparent enough for me to tell that (interesting you you also imply slashdot may be lying about how karma works, but only because it helps your point). Whether or not stories may come up where I want to say something "unpopular" is irrelevant. If my karma is already at or near max - or even if I simply believe it to be - there is no reason karma whore.

      Right -- in other words, you didn't want to. I know you didn't want to. That was the whole point! You didn't want to include that information upfront, so you could karma whore. I get that.

      See above.

      No, it's not based on any one reason for karma whoring.

      Well, that's the example you used. But for ANY reason, karma whoring is still not necessary if you have no reason to believe you need any karma, which is my case.

      Of course, you can claim I'm lying, and secretly trying to hide the fact that I am karma whoring.

      Or you could say that even the satisfaction of posting information that others may find useful, and having that information modded up, could also be "karma whoring".

      In fact, at this point, it's clear you believe that my only or primary purpose was to karma whore, when in reality, it was to post the information I posted, and have people see it, irrespective of my slashdot karma. Most of the information in that post is utterly irrelevant to the release of plan information, which was specifically why I didn't include it. I also didn't want to waste a bunch of time with the submission, as slashdot's first come, first served submission policy often results in total garbage being published first, and more comprehensive submissions being rejected. So, if you really want to know the exact reasoning, that's one of my purposes for keeping the submission concise and on-topic. Did I want to say more about a couple of other related topics? Absolutely. Which is why I did. But, unfortunately, it wasn't for slashdot karma.

      Sure -- just the people who deliberately degrade the usefulness of their posts so that they can spread the information across several and get more karma.

      No. I said I didn't include information that wasn't appropriate for the submission. I didn't say that I deliberately degraded the usefulness of the post, either, nor do I believe I did. I kept it exactly on topic for what the submission was. Posting a comment in the article doesn't have to be for karma. Your premise is flawed.

      Which [logical fallacy] did I make?

      [Y]yours is one of, "All A are in B. Therefore, all B must be in A."

      Cool, thanks for the clarification. Now, for the hard part: define A and B, and say where I made such a statement.

      That's the easy part: it's the part where you implied that because karma whores post to get modded up, that any post (especially posted by the submitter) that gets modded up must be made by a karma whore.

      A = karma whores
      B = posts that get modded up

      Since (I believe) my karma was maxed out, why, again, would I need to karma whore? If the answer is just because you think I must be karma whoring, save it. I'm telling you the reasons why I didn't include the other miscellaneous stuff in the submission, and that I didn't post for karma. You obviously don't believe that. The discussion is then likely over.

      I was claiming the(!) iPhone was anticipated, not the submission.

      You said:

      "it's anticipated becuas

    12. Re:A few MORE notes by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Ok, so, out of all this, you still think I posted to karma whore. It is my firm belief that my karma was already maxed out

      So what? I don't care what you claim to believe. It doesn't matter what motivates you to make posts like you did. It could be for karma. It could be to see yourself get modded up early. It could be to get your name out there and get your beloved geek cred. I don't know what motivates you to karma whore (or more specifically, make posts that get modded up regardless of net karma contribution), and I don't really care which motive you chose. You deliberately withheld information so that could be ride in and be "informative".

      See above.

      No. "Above" does not explain what was so special about the unique circumstances behind your post that REQUIRED you to spread it across posts. You only say that you wanted to spread it. Yeah. We know that.

      That's the easy part: it's the part where you implied that because karma whores post to get modded up, that any post (especially posted by the submitter) that gets modded up must be made by a karma whore.

      Ah, nothing like seeing the condescending invocation of a logical fallacy unravel!

      That wasn't the argument. As others and I have pointed out to you, it wasn't the "posting informatively" that makes you a karma whore; it was degrading the content of your submission so you could include it in a later karma-allowable post. And it was based on logical probability, not logical necessity.

      You can understand how one would think the "it" in "it's anticipated because [...]" refers to iPhone plan pricing,

      No, I can't. If you had enough attention span to read things in context, you'd see my complaint (from the beginning) was about /. being used to advertise a product.

      me:So why apply this outrage selectively?

      you:That's a whole other argument.


      Yeah -- if your attention span doesn't reach back to my initial post, part of which complained about /. turning into advertisements.

      But that still doesn't change the fact that this was notable, anticipated, and news a lot of people were waiting for.

      Each tiny detail is "notable" because people like you feed the hype and make it news. Again, why apply the advertising outrage selectively? Wouldn't it be just as bad to report "special discounts" coming up on Dell systems?

      Yes, this really doesn't matter. And I feel the need to respond because you seem like one of those people who paints your opponent in any argument/discussion as ignorant or as using fallacious reasoning, and if I didn't respond, then the assumption is that you're "right".

      Projection, much? I respond because I don't like to see idiots get away with ridiculous arguments that appeal to the biases of the readers. Less obviously-flawed arguments? Fine. Flawed arguments that don't appeal to pre-existing biases? Fine. Obviously-flawed arguments that appeal to pre-existing biases? Not so fine.

      I posted because I wanted to post that information

      Of course -- just not in the original submission where more people would see it and you couldn't get modded up.

    13. Re:A few MORE notes by daveschroeder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So what? I don't care what you claim to believe. It doesn't matter what motivates you to make posts like you did. It could be for karma. It could be to see yourself get modded up early. It could be to get your name out there and get your beloved geek cred. I don't know what motivates you to karma whore (or more specifically, make posts that get modded up regardless of net karma contribution), and I don't really care which motive you chose. You deliberately withheld information so that could be ride in and be "informative".

      No. I "withheld" (poor choice of word, on your part) the additional minutiae for exactly the reasons I explained. Namely, to keep the submission concise and on-topic, with a greater chance of being accepted for reasons of both timeliness and accuracy.

      Ah, nothing like seeing the condescending invocation of a logical fallacy unravel!

      Wrong. That that was the implication of the statement you made. Which is why I had the word "implied" in bold.

      That wasn't the argument. As others and I have pointed out to you, it wasn't the "posting informatively" that makes you a karma whore; it was degrading the content of your submission so you could include it in a later karma-allowable post. And it was based on logical probability, not logical necessity.

      No. No one has pointed that aspect of it ("degrading" the content of the submission) but you. And I already said I wasn't posting for karma. And it wasn't degrading anything, as I've already explained several times now why I submitted what I did, and why I posted additional miscellanea as a comment. And it wasn't for karma, no matter what you think. Sorry.

      And if I cared about karma, would I keep responding to you, and getting my posts modded down as offtopic, especially since downmods seem to count more against karma than upmods count for it? (This is anecdotal, but over the years has seemed to be true.)

      No, I can't. If you had enough attention span to read things in context, you'd see my complaint (from the beginning) was about /. being used to advertise a product.

      Sorry, you're wrong. Your were DIRECTLY responding to me saying that iPhone plan pricing is one of the most anticipated items, and you said "it's anticipated because [...]"

      I believe you "meant" iPhone, but in context, it is absolutely reasonable to think that you were also referring to iPhone plan pricing being anticipated, considering I had just said exactly that, and that's the sentence to which you responded.

      You're digging yourself in.

      Yeah -- if your attention span doesn't reach back to my initial post, part of which complained about /. turning into advertisements.

      No. That's a whole other argument than karma whoring. Notice that's what I'm taking issue with, and not the slashvertisement thing so much?

      Each tiny detail is "notable" because people like you feed the hype and make it news. Again, why apply the advertising outrage selectively? Wouldn't it be just as bad to report "special discounts" coming up on Dell systems?

      From the 50,000 foot view, yes.

      In reality, no, because far more people currently care about iPhone plan pricing than special discounts on Dell systems. Again, slashdot didn't have to accept my submission.

      Projection, much? I respond because I don't like to see idiots get away with ridiculous arguments that appeal to the biases of the readers. Less obviously-flawed arguments? Fine. Flawed arguments that don't appeal to pre-existing biases? Fine. Obviously-flawed arguments that appeal to pre-existing biases? Not so fine.

      Just because you assert that I'm using flawed arguments doesn't make it so. I told you EXACTLY why I submitted what I did and posted what I did. You don't believe that it wasn't for karma. Fine, I get it.

      Of course -- just not in the original submission where more people would see it and you couldn't get modded up.

      Asked and answered.

      And in case you didn't get it yet: I didn't post, or separate information out of the submission, for karma.

    14. Re:A few MORE notes by nytes · · Score: 1

      Let's all take a break from our computers now and step outside for some fresh air.

      Fresh air? Is that what you breathe when you put your nose right up to the air conditioner vent?

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    15. Re:A few MORE notes by garcia · · Score: 1

      In any case, it's pretty judgmental to assume that dave is preparing to launch an assault on some Slashdot sacred cow, and he doesn't have any links in his posts (in a sig or in the header) to a commercial site or blog, only his webpage at his school, so he's not making money off of people reading his posts.

      Just so you know, even though I do link to my website that contains ads, very few Slashdotters have ever clicked on any of them and I actually lose money when I get a ton of traffic from Slashdot postings.

      So, for me, money isn't a motivation for my posting even though my website is prominently linked from my posts here.

    16. Re:A few MORE notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Let's all take a break from our computers now and step outside for some fresh air.

      can't. cold outside.
      http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDQ10095.shtml

      (degrees C not F)

    17. Re:A few MORE notes by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      (interesting you you also imply slashdot may be lying about how karma works, but only because it helps your point). Hey, Dave. I normally like at least some of your posts, and find you to be insightful at times, despite the fact that you're obviously an Apple fanboi. However, I'm just going to point out to you that he's right: Slashdot uses a fairly heavily-modified slashcode, especially in the moderation department. I have no comment on the rest of this thread, just wanted to point out that moderation isn't so transparent on Slashdot as they would like you to think. ;)
    18. Re:A few MORE notes by norminator · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's anything wrong with linking to sites you get paid for, I'm just saying the only reason I can think of to complain about karma whoring would be when karma is used to bring up a poster's links more often. Anything else I can think of right now is just taking Slashdot too seriously.

      And really, even karma whoring for dollars doesn't seem like that big of a deal to me. If a person puts up enough posts that can get modded up to really keep up their karma, they probably are giving some useful/insightful/informative information now and again.

  18. Re:For the Love of Money by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nope. I don't sell cell phones (and never have), don't work for Apple or AT&T/Cingular (and never have), and I won't have anything to do with iPhone sales (other than buying one myself on Friday).

    I just submitted it because one of the most awaited pieces of information about iPhone was its plans, and since every other story here and on other tech blogs lately seems to be about iPhone...well, you get the idea.

  19. Congrats to Apple! by DogDude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Congrats for Apple on maintaining exorbitantly high prices on all of their products and services. If they can get enough suckers to buy this, then good for them. Just goes to show how powerful some smart marketing can be, even among supposedly "educated" consumers.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Congrats to Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a stupid thing to say. Did you have this comment all typed up and ready to post, and not check the facts first?

      No plan from any carrier in the US with unlimited data and comparable minutes is significantly cheaper than these.

    2. Re:Congrats to Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they want it to be a success, the 2 year plan should be including in the cost of the phone, not extra.

    3. Re:Congrats to Apple! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Huh? This is a high end pda device...and its priced in the same range (The Hermes was about $400 at launch...a 4GB uSD would probably be $100 if you could buy one today). Now, it's not likely to fall as quickly or be discounted as heavily since it's not at resellers, but it's not that far out there.

      As for the service, the cost is pretty good given the plan. AT&T (aka cingular) is not known ofr being the cheapest, but it also is not the most expensive. If you were to as for a basic, no frills voice plan, you'd be hard pressed to get one "at retail" for less than $30 a month. Unlimited data? Most are about $40, I believe the best are in the $20 range. Throw in 200MMS at a nickel a piece and - guess what - $30+$20+(200*$0.05)=$60.

      FWIW, I currently pay $60 for my Hermes on cingular, and I had to game the system to get the data+mms for $20 instead of the $40 "pda" unlim data plan without any MMS. And don't even think of comparing it to the extortion they charge for the blackberry plans.

      Is it cheap? No. Is it overpriced for the market segment? Not at all. If you're one of those "got to have the cool stuff" people, that extra $100-$200 is a small price to pay over Mr. Jones's new Blackberry in the next cube.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Congrats to Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you have hermes. Treatment for that is getting better, I hear.

    5. Re:Congrats to Apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is the most expensive, then?

  20. If everyone jumped off a bridge by Joebert · · Score: 1

    MetroPCS was charging $99 a month here for unlimited minutes & no data, their service was terrible though, my brothers had alot of explaining to do with people since he's been using them.

    I'm on a T-Mobile contract myself, 3000 minutes that are valid to any non-tolled number of the 48 contenental United States at anytime, unlimited mobile-to-mobile, & data for rates similar to the contracts from AT&T.
    The service is ok, though I had to manually set my phone to piggyback on Cingulars' network when I was in Paoli Indiana last year.


    I think the biggest issue for people is going to be trying to get everyone they know switched over so the mobile-to-mobile kicks in.
    Alot of people are already in contracts with other companies & the people on pre-paid are going to laugh at a 2-year contract.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1

      > unlimited mobile-to-mobile

      This is in the summary as well, "unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling". Could you explain what this means? Maybe it's just because I don't live in the US, but why would you get a limited number of minutes, but "unlimited" calls to other mobiles? Aren't most calls made from a mobile phone to another mobile phone?

      /me is confused

    2. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by xjerky · · Score: 1

      Isn't 'mobile-to-mobile' a misnomer? It's probably "unlimited Cingular-to-Cingular" instead. Currently, if I call someone on Verizon Wireless, it still comes out of my minutes.

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    3. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      mobile-to-mobile as in other mobile users with the same carrier, but not necessarily the same service plan.

      For instance, if I use T-Mobile & so does my friend, then neither of us are charged minutes when we talk to eachother on our mobiles no matter what time it is, & in my case, wherever we are in the United States.
      I could talk to a friend in California using T-Mobile from here in Florida untill our batteries died every day & still have the same bill at the end of the month.

      If my friend was using AT&T, I would be charged minutes for calling them, I don't know what would happen to them though.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Odiumjunkie · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see, thank you. Isn't the term a little confusing?

    5. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're setting us up so that they can get everyone for huge bills one month because they changed the definition of mobile-to-mobile to mean when you call yourself. :P

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    6. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Aren't most calls made from a mobile phone to another mobile phone?"

      No, if I had to think about it...most of my minutes are cell phone to landline. I don't have a landline anymore (ditched it after becoming a nomad post-Katrina). But, I mainly use my phone on weekends to talk to parents, and friends using the free long distance (weekends and after 7pm weekdays). I usually try to call my friends on their landline number first...and if no answer, I leave a message on the machine, and then try their cell phone number.

      I don't know that many people that have 'cut the cable' as I have....so, I definitely call more landlines than I do cell phones.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      He means unlimited to other people on his same carrier.

      I'm using T-Mobile for that feature, myself. My immediately family (mom, dad, 2 sisters) are all on T-Mobile and any calls we make to each other, or any other T-Mobile phone, are free.

      If we call a Verizon mobile, or a landline, etc, then we have to use our minutes.

      It sounds really great at first, but we -still- manage to use all our minutes each month anyhow, and none of us are really big talkers.

      I have thought about MetroPCS (where all calls are unlimited, to anyone) but my family stupidly signed a 2 yr contract about a year ago to get free cheap-ass phones (they break theirs a lot) and the coverage for MetroPCS is apparently really bad.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    8. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those clumsy people like myself, I buy the cheap prepaid C139 from walmart $20. and switch cards, doesn't extend contract... It isn't supposed to work, but it does (supposedly it would be detected and turned off according to cingular). If I manage to get an Iphone, I will still do this, as it makes a great phone for the beach, the gym, the garden and the garage.

    9. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by twint0 · · Score: 1

      how did you manually piggyback on cingular in indiana? i have this issue when i go to kentucky to visit family and I'm on T-Mobile myself, but theres only a cingular tower available down there. i try all day to connect to it. denied. but yet, here in Iowa, my phone piggybacks on cingular automagically. interesting.

    10. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I had to switch my phone from automatic to manual network selection, then select Cingular from a detected networks list, it was actually the only one on the list & I found it on accident when my buddy flew home for the weekend & I was in a cabin in the woods all by myself & had just watched the entire first season of Sopranos back to back.
      The area I was in was on the out-skirts of Paoli, a small town really, some guy named Jerry Fuhs owns just about everything in it, the network operators there probably figure nobody would think to piggyback on their network, or even have the technical knowhow really.

      I just looked on my phone, it's called "Operator Selection" on this phone.
      I get a choice of T-Mobile & Cingular here in Clearwater, FL.
      Yep, Cingular tells me to go F myself here in the city, I was using a different phone back then too though so I'm not sure if it's the phone or the network.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    11. Re:If everyone jumped off a bridge by twint0 · · Score: 1

      yeah my blackberry pearl doesnt like it when i hop on cingular... so i try not to hop on them too much. I had done the manual add as well when i had a razr and had no luck. I've been told some cingular towers wont allow T-Mobile or any other GSM roamers on their towers just yet... which is b.s.!

  21. Ah ha! by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the phone calls will be running on voIP, which is *data*, then technically there should be no monthly limit on minutes. Who wants to be the first to try this out?

    I think you may have just hit on the very reason why Apple isn't supporting 3rd party apps. I'll bet the deal with AT&T had some sort of language to prevent this very thing since many of the iPhone's coolest features require a lot of data access. Since non-unlimited data plans are nightmarishly expensive if you're a heavy web user (like I am), it seems almost a prerequisite that iPhone plans come with unlimited data.

    Naturally, this opens up the very possibility you just mentioned, so both AT&T and Apple are probably very keen on making sure that it doesn't happen. Hence, no iPhone SDK for 3rd parties. All the bluster about controlling the experience is probably just that -- bluster meant to distract from the real issue.

    Why else would Apple cripple a brand new platform that could fuel a rush of developers for them except to appease AT&T?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Ah ha! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why else would Apple cripple a brand new platform that could fuel a rush of developers for them except to appease AT&T?"

      Its actually for the reasons that they stated. I know the Slashdot set is rife with conspiracy theories but Apple and AT&T simply want to avoid the nightmare that other phones cause, such as Treos and WMobile devices of being returned when the user installs some instable 3rd party app and of course they go home and reload everything that was on the first phone onto the second phone causing another return, repeat repeat repeat.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Ah ha! by cpu_fusion · · Score: 1

      I agree with your observation, but there is another good reason for limiting iPhone development to webapps: security. With only Safari as the platform for 3rd party apps, there is a much smaller set of APIs to secure against a malicious app essentially being able to spy on every phone call, email; even mascarade as the person.

      Just a thought; of course I'm guessing. :)

    3. Re:Ah ha! by NoAnswers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would be surprised if Apple didn't demand that AT&&T make unlimited data a manadory requirement to carrying the phone. Phone companies vary in price but every phone typically has data packages as secondary options. People who don't realize the data usage might be high refuse the purchase and pay for the kilobyte transfer or buy reduced programs, earning the carriers extra money for overages. Presuming that data transfer will be high on the iPhone, Apple thought to stem off complaints by removing the option.

    4. Re:Ah ha! by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you have a Treo running Windows Mobile or Palm OS you just do a hard reset and you're back to how it was when you opened the box. Why would users have to go back to store? Even then, the person at the store will just do a hard reset for the customer because they can't read the half page quick start/troubleshooting guide. It's a matter of pressing and holding two buttons, one of which you can't normally press since it is behind the battery. I wouldn't say this is a nightmare support experience at all considering all the software out there for these phones.

      There is tons of 3rd party support for pretty much every phone out there with a computer interface, this is simply not an excuse. Apple wants complete control and they are willing to work with AT&T to make it happen. It's no different than how Apple has ever behaved on every other endeavor including the ipod. Not sure why you think it would be any different now.

    5. Re:Ah ha! by rcs1000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its actually for the reasons that they stated. I know the Slashdot set is rife with conspiracy theories but Apple and AT&T simply want to avoid the nightmare that other phones cause, such as Treos and WMobile devices of being returned when the user installs some instable 3rd party app and of course they go home and reload everything that was on the first phone onto the second phone causing another return, repeat repeat repeat.

      Wow: nice conspiracy theory. According to Merrill Lynch, return rates at HTC (the world's largest maker of Windows Mobile phone) at 2.2%, against an industry average of 3%. So, those "nightmare" return rates are... made up.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    6. Re:Ah ha! by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know the Slashdot set is rife with conspiracy theories but Apple and AT&T simply want to avoid the nightmare that other phones cause
      You can't make something false just by calling it a conspiracy. Think about it: limited voice, unlimited data. Why would somebody not install some software to circumvent this arbitrary distinction if they could? Apple already has more than a little experience selling devices that accept 3rd party applications - I seem to recall they got their start in personal computers :)
    7. Re:Ah ha! by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      But what if Apple is simply unsure of it's "mini" OS X the iPhone is running, and would rather field test the OS on a large scale with a more or less perfect knowledge of the the state of all the handsets out in the world. After the remaining kinks are worked out, they can roll out an update to the OS (presumably the software on the phone is upgradeable), and release an SDK. The iPod was without official 3rd party SDKs for quite some time, and, admittedly, the average Joe still can't get access to the iPod SDK, nevertheless, there is now 3rd party software for the iPod.

      So who knows? It may take another hardware revision before Apple is ready to allow 3rd parties into their phone, or maybe just a software update.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:Ah ha! by Paradox · · Score: 0

      If you have a Treo running Windows Mobile or Palm OS you just do a hard reset and you're back to how it was when you opened the box. Why would users have to go back to store? Even then, the person at the store will just do a hard reset for the customer because they can't read the half page quick start/troubleshooting guide. It's a matter of pressing and holding two buttons, one of which you can't normally press since it is behind the battery.


      Oh. So if my treo is acting up because of my third party apps, all I need to do is remove the battery, find the button behind it, and press and hold that button in unison with another button on the opposite side of the case? What could be simpler?

      I wouldn't say this is a nightmare support experience at all considering all the software out there for these phones.


      For Xenu's sake, listen to yourself! You're so desensitized to the awful experience and software quality of modern phones that you think the battery-removal dance is a positive experience!
      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    9. Re:Ah ha! by abes · · Score: 1

      I still have to wonder why they aren't providing a scripting language option if this is the case. I doubt you'd be able to manage to write a Skype client, and it would provide the core functionality that most people want from the SDK. It's still not as good as an SDK, but it's a decent compromise.

      Additionally, since Apple has Applescript hooks already in most of their apps, it's hard to imagine it taking them long to get Applescript working. With PyObjC too, a Python -> Cocoa bridge, it should be easy to provide a Python option as well. In the second case, all they have to do is release the interface for what they will allow us to use. (now that I'm think of it, F-Script would also work well).

      Given that Apple has *always* provided a scripting option, something strange is up.

      One last point -- the iPhone already has web apps to do things that I suspect AT&T doesn't want to allow (i.e. a chat client). It cannot be as good as a real chat app, as it requires you to have that web page always open, and there's no good way to notify you of messages. However, I can imagine Apple using this to pressure AT&T to let them just release the SDK.

      If the iPhone is supposed to be a communications device, 200 text messages is not sufficient. Unless typing on the iPhone just *really* sucks, in which case maybe it doesn't really matter. However, considering I've managed to type messages on the dial pad of my old cell phone, it's hard to imagine it gets worse than that.

    10. Re:Ah ha! by Chuqmystr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you may have just hit on the very reason why Apple isn't supporting 3rd party apps. I'll bet the deal with AT&T had some sort of language to prevent this very thing since many of the iPhone's coolest features require a lot of data access.

      Indeed. Having worked in wireless myself, down in the customer support trenches, I can tell you that most carriers rue the dawn of Treo's and Win smartphones and such. If they could take it all back without blatantly appearing to be the complete and utter bastards what that they are then they certainly would faster than a 10khz tone drops an old fashion amps call.

      Enter his Steveness wielding the iPhone. It does a few nifty tricks heretofore unseen from cellphones and oh, look, it's an iPod too. "Smartphone schmartphone" sez AT&T execs, "it's an iPhone and that's different. Make Mr. Jobs tweak the reality distortion field to our liking. He will acquiesce if he wants his precious to ever touch a network like ours, Muwahahaha!" Making a deal with a carrier is akin to making a deal with the dark one himself. I'd not be surprised if the iPhone has shed features along the way, features some of us have been bitching for. I've seen this first hand many times. Think Motorola and Verizon for example. Or Nokia and most any US carrier. And need I remind you how supposedly Jobs had approached VZW first who then sent him packing? It's my observation that most of us will never again see the day of newer "smart" phones getting to market 100% unmolested and in their original state as intended by the manufacturers.

    11. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who owns an HTC Wizard, I'll agree that HTC phones are bloody awesome, and that they deserve to have a lower-than-average return rate.

      I was originally planning on upgrading to a Nokia 9300i sometime in the future, but my experiences with the Wizard have caused me to consider upgrading to an HTC Kaiser instead.

    12. Re:Ah ha! by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      >you think the battery-removal dance is a positive experience!

      more positive than having to take it back to a store or having the company assume i'm stupid so they limit development on the phone so i don't 'muck it up'...

    13. Re:Ah ha! by Knara · · Score: 1

      Wow. Jobs' RDF is strong with you. My team supports about 6 dozen or so treos, along with a variety of older Blackberries and Axims of various types. The Axims and Treos are wandering around with sales people. To my knowledge, the dance you speak of isn't 1) common, 2) causing mental anguish. Somehow the world has been able to have usable experience with smartphones/PDAs before Apple decided to boon us with the iPhone, so stop gushing over this device as if no one has ever made a good smartphone that people liked using and found useful before.

    14. Re:Ah ha! by imuffin · · Score: 1

      If the phone calls will be running on voIP,

      The aren't.

      I think you may have just hit on the very reason why Apple isn't supporting 3rd party apps.

      Maybe they're afraid of VOIP on future 3G iPhones, but not on this one. Have you ever tried a VOIP app on GPRS? The latency is so bad it's unusable. It's not even usable on my Sprint EVDO phone tethered to a laptop, but much moreso than a GPRS data connection.

    15. Re:Ah ha! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right.

      I seem to remember something said back in January about Cingular giving Apple "unprecedented" direct access to their network, and that 3rd party apps were a "security" concern. I'm not sure what that means, but it sounds to me like they were concerned straight-off that if people were allowed to hack the iPhone, people might be able to do things with Cingular's network that Cingular didn't want.

    16. Re:Ah ha! by dloose · · Score: 1

      Oh. So if my treo is acting up because of my third party apps, all I need to do is remove the battery, find the button behind it, and press and hold that button in unison with another button on the opposite side of the case? What could be simpler?

      I read this as sarcasm. If it wasn't intended to be read that way, ignore the rest of this post.

      Holding two buttons down is hardly rocket science. It sounds to me like you tried to make it sound complicated but failed to do even that. I agree that it's not blindingly obvious, but I would maintain that an action as destructive as a complete reset of the phone's memory should require a complicated gesture. It's not something you want to happen accidentally. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that it's no big deal if the user has to call tech support to figure it out. At least, that's far better than having the user call tech support to figure out why his phone randomly lost all of its contents while sitting idly in his pocket.

      For Xenu's sake, listen to yourself! You're so desensitized to the awful experience and software quality of modern phones that you think the battery-removal dance is a positive experience!

      You're right... it's not easy and it's not intuitive. I'm just not sure why you seem to be citing Apple as an example of a company that gets this right -- the iPod reset sequence is center button + menu for 5 or more seconds, which is hardly obvious.

      A good interface should make easy things easy and hard things possible. It should also prevent rare, highly destructive actions from happening accidentally. Hiding the trigger for such an action behind a battery seems pretty smart to me.

      That said, I agree that the software on most mobile phones sucks and I think Apple has probably trumped them all.

    17. Re:Ah ha! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Aye, and it's the storage and PMP functionality as well.

      I mean, we can't have a WiFi-enabled portable device actually share eight gigs of music and movies to anyone and everyone, can we?

    18. Re:Ah ha! by kasparov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, but WiFI is becomming more and more ubiquitous. VoIP on your smart phone (the Nokia E61 has WiFI and a SIP client built in) and a metropolitan wireless internet account would be *very* bad for cell phone companies...

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    19. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost every Windows Mobile phone out there (and a great deal of the WM PDAs like Dell Axims and HP iPaqs) is a rebranded HTC. So HTC having very low return rates pretty much translates to WM phones having very low return rates.

    20. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple wants complete control and they are willing to work with AT&T to make it happen. It's no different than how Apple has ever behaved on every other endeavor including the ipod. Not sure why you think it would be any different now. Yep, just like the AppleTV.
    21. Re:Ah ha! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      FACT: most treos in the 600 and 650 line were poorly designed. 90% of the failures were do to the fact t hat the treo 600 and 650 were utter crap. Hell if the battery got below 50% on most phones you got a nasty buzzing in the audio on a phone call.

      the treos were crap and earned that reputation. I haven touched a treo cince because of being burned by palm one Twice with their crappy hardware.

      Yes some rare instances of 3rd part apps causing problems. those apps did NOT cause the random shutdowns, reboots, lockups and buzzing that were normal with even a pristine treo.

      I know I had 4 600's and 6 650's (yes I was an idiot to even try a 650 after the 600 mess) until I forced cingular to credit me full price for the damn thing and swor off smartphones forever. I went through 6 650's in 6 months. They are garbage.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:Ah ha! by Paradox · · Score: 1

      The Axims and Treos are wandering around with sales people. To my knowledge, the dance you speak of isn't 1) common, 2) causing mental anguish.


      1) I didn't claim it was common. I simply claimed that as a troubleshooting procedure it's unacceptable.

      2) The sad fact is that for most people it doesn't cause mental anguish. Our standards for phones are so low that we just accept things like removing the battery to find a hidden button and then resetting the phone to factory spec as par for the course.

      Somehow the world has been able to have usable experience with smartphones/PDAs before Apple decided to boon us with the iPhone


      I do not think the iPhone will do things like replace oxygen or solve global warming. I am excited that phones will start to be seriously evaluated in terms of usability as well as features. We take phone software's awfulness for granted, but we'd never accept the poor usability and low software quality on our home computers or from a webapp.

      If nothing else, the iPhone really brings that aspect to the fore of public awareness. The products we've worked with up until now have been usable as you say, but I don't think anyone would say their usability is "good".
      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    23. Re:Ah ha! by Paradox · · Score: 1

      more positive than having to take it back to a store or having the company assume i'm stupid so they limit development on the phone so i don't 'muck it up'...


      But less positive than if it didn't break in the first place.
      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    24. Re:Ah ha! by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Probably because all 3rd party software will require certification from Apple by way of application signing using Apple issued certificates. Just a guess, though I suspect it would be no different than the current Symbian S60 V3 crud.

    25. Re:Ah ha! by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      If installing a 3rd party app caused the phone to not work then you should use a different 3rd party app. The reset only gets you back to usable within 30 seconds of your phone dying so you can receive phone calls again. If the app only causes problems when you run it then you can just pull the battery and pop it back in for a soft-reset which won't result in the loss of anything.

      If you don't think the iPhone will have the same troubleshooting procedure you're in for a world of hurt given that this is a 1st gen product. How well did OS 10.0 work? You will have to reboot/reset/factory reset your iPhone depending on what you do with it. Since you don't have the option of installing 3rd party tools then you only have to worry about Apple screwing up the development of it here and there. This will happen and there is no question in it. The bonus is that a firmware release will probably fix issues as the thing enjoys proper QA from the public.

      For the record, I have a Treo and have never needed to hard reset it. There is a lot of development support out there for it which means there are both good apps and bad apps that get installed. Fortunately when it comes to smart phones we don't just install every bit of software we come across. If we have a problem we evaluate software to correct the specific issue. That has yet to cause problems on any of the phones in this company at least.

      I am not desensitized to the problems but my Samsung A900 has the same issues with text messaging and Razrs have the same problem as well, sometimes it takes a while to send a message. That's pretty much the only issue I ever come across. Occasionally there is slow performance on both the A900 and the Treo in which case I pull the battery and pop it back in.

      It's really not difficult considering it only happens once in a great while and it's not like the cell phone is so mission critical it can't afford ANY downtime.

    26. Re:Ah ha! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "If the iPhone is supposed to be a communications device, 200 text messages is not sufficient. Unless typing on the iPhone just *really* sucks, in which case maybe it doesn't really matter. However, considering I've managed to type messages on the dial pad of my old cell phone, it's hard to imagine it gets worse than that."

      Depends. If you listen only to /. you'd think everyone in the world depends almost soley on SMS txt messaging. I guess it depends on your 'world', but, pretty much in my circle...it is very rarely used. I have friends that refuse to pay extra for it, and I myself really only 'discovered' it and the T9 functionality during the aftermath of Katrina, when voice was impossible to any phone in the 504 area code, but, text messaging would go through. I learned to use it then.

      With the iPhone, I'd probably be doing the same thing...mostly either voice, or maybe email through my own servers....or picture mail which I do now (since with sprint vision, pic mail is 'free', so I send a pic and type text on it).

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    27. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...

      Possibility of breaking phone + resetting using battery's switch
      vs.
      Phone will never break (hah) + Being stuck with what Mr. Jobs and company think I should be using *my * phone for...

      I'm keeping my Treo.

    28. Re:Ah ha! by abes · · Score: 1

      Since this is on /., I think I'm also supposed to strongly disagree with you for no good reason, and question your sexual practices. However, I mostly agree with you, especially since my previous statement was a bit vague.

      I hate SMS messages, and try to use them as little as possible. However, I do IM with people throughout the day. If the iPhone is just another cell phone (which .. and sorry to challenge anyone's religion, but it might be), then 200 text messages is more than I'll ever use. I probably don't do more than 20 in a month.

      However, if the iPhone is actually supposed to be something more -- a mobile platform to do all things internetty, then having IMing capabilities is kinda important. I send out way more than 200 IMs a month, so it will become an issue for me. Which is in part where the functionality of the keyboard also comes in. Maybe web apps will allow us the needed functionality, but it still takes too long to type anything.

      But yeah, when I figured out how to use T9, it definitely made life much nicer. Except for the fact that I use tons of naughty words it doesn't seem to 'know'. I expect that in some ways the predictive typing that the iPhone has is similar to T9.

      I'm holding out hope for the keyboard .. someone pointed out that it takes a couple of weeks to get good with a tablet, so maybe after a week or so, it really will get good (and it's not just some marketeer who made that up).

    29. Re:Ah ha! by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      so the iphone is unbreakable software wise? HA

    30. Re:Ah ha! by Penguin's+Advocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whenever I see the word Treo, I feel obliged to point out how terrible it is. The Treo is terrible at everything it does. It is very slow and crashes all the time. It's a terrible phone, it's a terrible pda, and god help anyone who thinks using it as a music player (pTunes...) is a good idea. I own a 700p. Even with the extended battery I can't get more than 24 hours of standby time. If I actually use the phone that goes to nothing really fast. Using the email client or the web browser will kill the battery in under an hour. As I've said numerous times in other places, a lot of people at my office have treo's ranging from the 650 to the 755 (all p's, don't know how much greener the grass is on the w side...) and they invariably hate them. Not saying the iPhone is the be-all-end-all, but I've yet to meet someone who really liked their smartphone. Addicted? Sure, that's why I still have this godforsaken thing, but there is no joy in using it. Smartphones today are like heroin. They become addictive almost immediately, and once you're hooked you need your fix just to stay alive, no matter how bad it is.

      --
      Frag 'em all...
    31. Re:Ah ha! by burndive · · Score: 1

      Exactly how hard would it be to write one of those Safari "Applications" to send text messages for you via e-mail/AJAX?

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    32. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zomg jobs actually ownz ur mind if you buy the iphone.

    33. Re:Ah ha! by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is probably a generational thing - but logically - for me the most effective "real-time" method of communication with a phone - is, you know, TALKING. If I need to clarify with text, or send something that needs to be transfered, transcripted or otherwise referenced later, email is fine for that and with unlimited data - that's doubly fine.

      Why do I need to blog via SMS, and isn't 200 enough? (I'm even assuming worst-case that I'm paying per incoming message here too - fuck if I know how those plans work, I'll admit I'm fuzzy on SMS)

    34. Re:Ah ha! by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall they got their start in personal computers :) Even more interesting, Jobs and Woz got their start, prior to even the Apple I, with... hacking the (AT&T) phone system. Ironic, isn't it?

      Man... from Apple Computer vs Apple records to iPods and iTunes, from phone phreaks to iPhones... things really come full circle, don't they?
      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    35. Re:Ah ha! by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I have the 700w and we've been buying the 700wx phones which are even better. We don't have crashes and I'm surprised about your battery life problem. Perhaps you need to mess with the power save features. I have a 4gig SD card in it which I keep a good amount of music on. I routinely use it for 4+ hours at a time while in flight and the battery doesn't even blink. I can't imagine the Palm OS is that inefficient with power management. Perhaps you need to turn the screen brightness down or something. We have about 20 in our office and the only time someone seems to have an issue if when they open a power point presentation or a PDFs on their phone. Acrobat is atrocious on any smartphone I've seen. We use it for email with ActiveSync and it just goes and goes.

      All of the smartphones I've seen have different issues but I've come to the conclusion that the Treos do a lot more good than harm. I definitely find mine reliable although I'm unsure of why you would need more than 24 hours standby time on a smartphone. I plug it in at night when I go to sleep. Takes about two hours and it's fully charged. I'm thinking maybe your phone is defective. I've got three or four days without charging the phone at max and it was downloading my email the whole time which is pretty impressive. Of course it also depends on signal strength. If you have poor coverage in your area that would certainly explain the battery issues.

    36. Re:Ah ha! by Zixia · · Score: 1

      Since non-unlimited data plans are... ...limited?

    37. Re:Ah ha! by Zixia · · Score: 1

      Ah, but WiFI is becomming more and more ubiquitous.

      More ubiquitous?

    38. Re:Ah ha! by Penguin's+Advocate · · Score: 1

      I'd definitely believe mine was defective if I wasn't surrounded by other people who have similar problems with similar and identical phones. I keep my screen brightness down to the lowest visible setting, and extraneous features like Blue Tooth off. I'm lucky to make it through the day with any charge left. I'm also often on the go without time or a place to charge it for more than 24 hours. I've used it in every major metropolitan area in the US and had the same problems universally, the signal strength can't be bad everywhere. I'll pull the battery during all my flights and still not make it through a weekend. I've also had fun experiences where I can't make or receive calls, but I can still go online and check my email (which of course is hell because the phone is so slow that even with EvDO it takes forever and crashes often during the middle of sending or receiving mail). I'll drop a call, and I can't call back, but I can get on AIM and respond. Of course the AIM client tends to crash the phone, so it's not a great solution.

      That said, there are two huge things I'd miss about the Treo if I switched to the iPhone. First and foremost, the ability to use my phone as a modem. That's the one great thing about the Treo, it makes a great modem. The second is an ssh client. Second only because if I can use my phone as a modem I can get away without an ssh client on the phone itself. Those are the only two things holding me back from throwing my treo off a bridge and buying an iPhone.

      In any case that's it, that's the Treo's one redeeming quality, it makes a good modem. Unfortunately for me, that's also one of the most important features of a phone, so I remain chained to my Treo for now. I honestly can't believe it could be that much better running windows mobile, but I'll have to reserve my judgment because I've never actually seen someone with a Treo running windows mobile...which is odd because I've seen a lot of Treos.

      --
      Frag 'em all...
    39. Re:Ah ha! by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Sounds like reception is thrashing the battery since as I'm sure you know it ramps up the power to get better reception if the signal is weak.

      The only feature about the Treo that is lacking in my experience is the amount of ram which sounds like is the source of your troubles. Also, first gen Treo 700s had the issue you describe with data corruption. It's interesting to see that the problem exists on the Palm side as well as the WM side. The AIM and MSN clients are rock solid on my end but I have excellent reception in most places I go. I also have a car adapter to charge it while I'm on the go. I have an airline adapter for regular devices which I could use to charge the phone although honestly I've never needed to.

      Do you use your phone as a modem or a router to use the EVDO network? Dialup kills me so using it as a modem wouldn't really be nice on my end. Of course everything I want to do I pretty can do through ActiveSync so it's never been much of an issue. My laptop has a built-in Verizon wireless radio which thankfully the company pays for so life is pretty easy when it comes to connectivity for me. If only Navision and Oracle were as easy to deal with.

      That said, about once a week I do pull the battery just because the memory wasn't getting released from the extremely limited ram on the phone. Once it's cleared up the phone is good for another week. Sometimes I allow text messages to build up too much, it takes about an hour to get rid of 800 text messages through the delete all option. The phone is quite useless during that process too.

      The iPhone just doesn't impress me, probably because I despise Apple with it's constant lock-in. They make a good GUI, hard to argue that. Beyond that the only thing special about the iPod was iTunes integration which brings the whole thing back to lock-in.

    40. Re:Ah ha! by abes · · Score: 1

      Text messages .. I don't know with AT&T, but with Verizon, fairly easily. IMs even easier. But doing it well .. in a fashion that's integrated with the iPhone in a nice and decent way isn't possible (i.e. think of the difference of any *real* app vs. a web app -- if you had to write a thesis, would you prefer using Microsoft Word, or Google's writing program [actually, I'd prefer LaTeX, but that's just me]).

      Worse yet, I don't want to run my own server (I used to .. but the waste of energy just doesn't appeal to me anymore, I'm trying to be a bit greener), and if I have to use someone else's server, then you have to deal with issues like fees, ads, or majorly slow servers. Nothing comes free or easy.

      If Apple never releases an SDK, or allows scripting, perhaps in a google like move (or with a google) provide free .Mac accounts to iPhone owners capable of doing AJAXey things? Not likely, but I guess not inplausible either...

    41. Re:Ah ha! by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Ok, I admit 'closer to becoming ubiquitous' would have been more better. ;-)

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
  22. Re IPhone by anand78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last phone I bought was a Treo 650, thnking that I will be using the applications. A year later I use my phone for " Making phone calls".

    1. Re:Re IPhone by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I got a cingular 8525 five months ago (aka HTC Hermes), and dropped the full data to a non-pda data plan (NATed access, email requires a workaround). I don't do email or IM, but I've used the browser for lookups when I'm out, and it's my full up planner and GPS (in the car with a BT GPS unit). I've even used it to entertain my 4yo when she gets antsy (the bubble game is her favorite, though I put Madagascar on the phone as a test of the video and that's nice for longer waits).

      Oh, yeah, it makes phone calls too. Actually, it's really good at that. Go figure.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Re IPhone by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      I too bought a Treo 650 back in February, mostly to replace my horribly outdated Palm and also to converge so I was only carrying one device. Since I already had a Palm I just continued to do all those things on my phone, and added mobile web browsing, mobile email with my gmail account in VersaMail and portable videos since I now had a video-capable Palm. I had a lot of downtime at work so the Treo came in handy to stave off boredom.

      Now that I've gotten a promotion and a full-day workload every day, I pretty much just use the Treo as a phone and to read e-books before bed. I still won't go to the iPhone though, even if AT&T were to start giving them away. I like the relative openness of my Treo and the thought of a locked down phone/pda is unbearable.

  23. I think a iPhone icon is needed by bodland · · Score: 1

    There are four iPod, Apple, Handheld and Communications categories in this article.

    I guess if that doesn't highlight the convergence of personal technologies I don't what else would.

  24. Unlimited data is a lot cheaper than that. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I pay $20 for unlimited data on top of my $40 300 minute plan.
    Unlimited data only costs $50 and up when its either a corporate plan or a data-only plan.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Unlimited data is a lot cheaper than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay $20 for unlimited data on top of my $40 300 minute plan.


      So you pay $60/month for 300 minutes and unlimited data? And how is that cheaper than the "$59.99/mo for 450 minutes, unlimited data, 200 SMS messages, rollover minutes, and unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling"?

    2. Re:Unlimited data is a lot cheaper than that. by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

      I was just about to ask the same thing. The economic perceptions of some slashdotters confound me.

    3. Re:Unlimited data is a lot cheaper than that. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Be confounded by yourselves, then. My reply was to pete.com's assertion that unlimited data costs $50 from AT&T. That's why I even explicitly noted that $50+ data plans were usually either corporate or data-only in the next line.

      I'm not asserting that the iPhone deal isn't better than what I'm getting; I'm asserting that unlimited data isn't normally as expensive as he thinks it is.

      Sheesh... context clues, people.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  25. lies, damn lies by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Apple and AT&T today announced service plans for iPhone, 4 days before its release in the US at 6pm local time on Friday, June 29 Today is the 26th. Unless you are working with some alternate calendaring system, its only three days from now to the 29th.
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:lies, damn lies by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Apple and AT&T today announced service plans for iPhone, 4 days before its release in the US at 6pm local time on Friday, June 29
      Today is the 26th. Unless you are working with some alternate calendaring system, its only three days from now to the 29th.
      Drink from the Firehose. The story was submitted yesterday, voted on, then approved today.
  26. Rate plan not so bad.... by xjerky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I currently pay $60 for 450 mins, unlimited data, and 1500 text messages for my Treo with Cingular. Thing is, I bought the Treo on eBay, and I swapped SIM cards from my old Motorola. So as far as Cingular is concerned, I'm still using that. They normally want to charge $40/month for unlimted data for Treos (as opposed to the $20 I'm currenly paying), which doesnt really make sense since unlimited dats is unlimited data.

    With that in mind this isn't too bad of a deal. It's the same as what I'm paying though 200 text messages instead of 1500. I assume there will be iChat for the iPhone which will use the data plan, so that won't be so bad.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    1. Re:Rate plan not so bad.... by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      They normally want to charge $40/month for unlimted data for Treos (as opposed to the $20 I'm currenly paying), which doesnt really make sense since unlimited dats is unlimited data.

      That's because Treo data is twice as betterer.

    2. Re:Rate plan not so bad.... by tighr · · Score: 1

      What plan are you on that gives you 450 minutes with unlimited data and 1500 messages for $60?

      I have the 450 minutes for $39.99, and the Media Max for $19.99, but mine comes with 200 messages. Effectively the exact same plan and price as this iPhone plan. I am using the Samsung Blackjack (also bought from eBay), and I should be using the PDA Max plan, but what they don't know wont hurt them. Of course, with my corporate discount, I only pay about $50 a month after taxes.

    3. Re:Rate plan not so bad.... by xjerky · · Score: 1

      It's the grandfathered MediaWorks plan from circa 2004 - now I can't make the slightest change to my account or else the Cingular customer service monkeys will "accidentally" delete it!

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    4. Re:Rate plan not so bad.... by Nastard · · Score: 1

      You know what? You're right.

      My fiance and I pay more for the same number of minutes on Verizon, and that's without unlimited data. The money saved will make up the cost of the phones in about a year.

  27. Nice price by Rethcir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    $60/mo for that many minutes, unlimited data, and 250 texts is an extremely reasonable price. If you disagree, you really are an apple-hating troll.org/blog. It's gonna be reeeeally hard to keep myself from dumping like $700 to switch and get this thing right away.

    1. Re:Nice price by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, I'm an AT&T hating troll. That said, I'll take a second look at the iphone when it's available on a different carrier. (Preferably one that doesn't want a contract).

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    2. Re:Nice price by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It's a decent price, but not "extremely" so. Unless you mean X-treem!!!!!!bangbang. (in which case, what are you, a damn marketer?)

      It's still a little too rich for my blood, but I wasn't planning on spending $500 on a phone in the immediate future anyway. At some point, the iPhone price will come down a bit (I think ~$300 is the I'll bite) and as these mobile internet thin clients (which is what they really are) become ubiquitous, we'll see the carriers become more competitive with their data plans.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm very enthusiastic about these developments. I think the iPhone is pushing this to the tipping point, and mobile internet thin clients will be the way most people will connect to the internet most of the time. We'll still have general purpose computers at home, most likely. At least slashdotters will.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Nice price by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Since AT&T had to make some pretty massive changes to it's voice mail system, you may be waiting for a while.

      Also, AT&T is busy buying up all other companies, so you may have to wait forever.
      If we are real lucky, I am wrong and we will be able to get a new carrier in a few months.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    From this announcement:

    System Requirements ...iPhone activation requires an Internet connection; an iTunes Store account or a major credit card; a valid Social Security number (as required by AT&T); the latest version of iTunes available at www.itunes.com and a PC or Mac with a USB 2.0 port and one of the following operating systems [blah, blah, blah...]

    Social Security number? WTF? This is 2007, companies that want my business should need my social security number.

    As the Social Security Administrationtells us, "Your number is confidential... You should be careful about sharing your number with anyone who asks for it (even when you are provided with a benefit or service)." I reluctantly give it to banks and brokerages who need it for tax purposes. I very, very reluctantly give it to medical organizations.

    A phone company? No, thank you.

    1. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by k_187 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I believe that's for the credit check they run on you. Thus, the proper anger should be about why the phone company needs to run a credit check on you and/or why a social security number is required to do so.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1

      Cingular/AT&T cellular are notorious for doing hard-pull credit checks on everyone that wants service. The SSN is to enable that credit pull. I don't like it either.

    3. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Credit Report. Every contract based cell phone company gets one to make sure you aren't a deadbeat. For that, they need an SSN. Yes, it's stupid that the credit reporting is based on SSN, but that's also usually the reason you're worried about giving it out, so I guess it kind of makes sense.

    4. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You're right. But this is Apple. Apple is the height of Consumerism Run Amok. I'm sure that there are people that would give Apple/AT&T a DNA sample to get their hands on this latest plastic gadget.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Informative

      All of the major cell phone companies require a SSN to do the credit checks...

      Once more, if you loose your password to the AT&T or Verizon websites, I have seen both sites require a SSN for password recovery.

      Tracfone and some other pay-as-you-go plans don't require any such sillyness.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    6. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "I believe that's for the credit check they run on you. Thus, the proper anger should be about why the phone company needs to run a credit check on you and/or why a social security number is required to do so."

      Ohh..that's another show stopper for me on the iPhone. I've always been with Sprint, but, I've NEVER given them my SS#. When I started, I refused, and I was happy to give them a cash deposit...which about a year later I got refunded.

      Can you not do this with AT&T? I don't hand out my SS unless it is required for SS taxation....or maybe for a credit check to say...buy a house.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      They want to have a level of confidence you'll pay your bill. Evil bastards! Why don't they just trust people? We all trust them to give them our Social Security Number, right? No?

    8. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by megaditto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't that the same company that is stonewalling the investigations into illegal wiretaps of Americans?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    9. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1

      Do you not have a cell phone right now? Whenever you buy a phone the carrier runs a credit check on you. In order to do a credit check they need your ssn.

    10. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      It says you need "a valid Social Security number", it doesn't say it has to be yours.

    11. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      In Europe, proof of identity and address is required, even for a prepaid phone.
      It's so the authorities can track you if your phone is used for 'illegal' purposes, (bomb threat, hate calls...)

      Well, that's what they tell us, anyway...

    12. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Trojan35 · · Score: 1

      No different than any other plan on ATT, or Sprint, or Verizon...

    13. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is a post 9/11 thing... I don't think VoiceStream ever asked for my Social Security Number before selling me their service, but that was over 7 years ago so I may not be entirely sure.

    14. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?! Last time I got a pay-as-you SIM, it was purchased in a shop over the counter. I just plopped it into my sony phone, activated it, and that was it. Has Blair got you limeys that far under his thumb these days?

    15. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by notneverwired · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I never understood that. A company can pull your credit without your SS#. I used to work in the mortgage industry. We just needed a name and an address to get a credit report. A SS# helped, but it wasn't necessary.

    16. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      No. That's probably AT&T.

      Apple just wants you to set up an account with them by Credit Card.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    17. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I want to see how many people bring the iPhone home to activate it, only to find out their credit sucks and have to return it.

    18. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Arkham · · Score: 1

      Tracfone and some other pay-as-you-go plans don't require any such sillyness.

      You do know that Tracfone IS AT&T right? They have their own billing system and firmware, and that's it. The network is the AT&T (Cingular) network.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    19. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just signed up for new service with AT&T (DSL / Landline). Just tell them that they can't have your SSN. After a standard disclaimer about potential credit check innacuracies you will continue with your account setup.

    20. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      They want to have a level of confidence you'll pay your bill. Evil bastards! Why don't they just trust people? We all trust them to give them our Social Security Number, right? No?


      Alltel allows you to do a deposit. Which they'll refund *with interest* after 1 year.

      Then again, Alltel seems to be the only cell carrier that isn't full of complete dicks.
    21. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Requiring a deposit -- what a way to show trust.

    22. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, Alltel seems to be the only cell carrier that isn't full of complete dicks.


      You don't work for them.

      The bosses here sometimes make Dilbert look good and well informed.
    23. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Can you not do this with AT&T?

      You can, actually. But don't expect fearmongering idiots to mention that.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    24. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by Zero+Zero · · Score: 1

      What if you buy the iPhone, get it at home, and fail the credit check? Do they tell you to take your brick back to the store, or bill a deposit to your iTunes account? It would make more sense to pre-qualify people on AT&T's site, rather than waiting until they've scored the handset and opened it.

    25. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by ne00 · · Score: 1

      we have to enter ssn after purchasing iphone as per the apple website info page. usually they ask for ssn before purchasing plan for credit approval. what if after buying iphone buyer's credit chek turns out to be bad and he/she is disapproved. if they ask for ssn before buying iphone for credit chek why its required again to enter via itunes.

    26. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      At the bottom of http://www.tracfone.com/, I see this:

      © 2007 TRACFONE® is a registered trademark of TracFone Wireless, Inc., a subsidiary of América Móvil.

      América Móvil appears to be a publicly-traded Brazillian company. It's a different company (Although AT&T might own stock-- I didn't check). And a number of independent cell phone companies resell service from AT&T, Sprint, etc.

      My friends who use Tracfone have never been required to give out their SSN.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    27. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Thus, the proper anger should be about why the phone company needs to run a credit check on you

      Because they are extending credit to you each month and need to ensure you won't welch on it. Just like everyone else who needs to run a credit check on you.

      and/or why a social security number is required to do so.

      It isn't--you can get a code from someone at AT&T and input that instead.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    28. Re:SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER? WTF? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      You go back to the store, get a refund for the $500 you just spent on a luxury item, and spend a good while thinking about how maybe you should have used that money to pay off your debts, you fucking deadbeat :P

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  29. 2nd gen? -- rubbish by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone knows that the 3rd gen will have a ball massager and and a cheek flosser. However, I am really stoked for the 4th gen which will cut the price of the phone to .25 of its original price, as Apple always does.
    According to the rumor mills, the 4th gen may also come in watermellon red, which as far as I'm concerned is the color of Kings.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:2nd gen? -- rubbish by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Maybe the fifth gen will actually let you make and receive phone calls!

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    2. Re:2nd gen? -- rubbish by cetan · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to do that? They'll all be far too busy drinking the SJ kool-aid.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  30. Don't most still require that? by RootWind · · Score: 1

    Don't most services still require a SSN for credit checking purposes? I certainly didn't have an option when I signed up for my cable internet, or phone service.

    1. Re:Don't most still require that? by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1

      I tell them not to pull my credit score, it's not authorized by me, if they want me as a customer they'll have to figure out some other way. Generally this means me paying a bit more up front or a deposit but that's OK by me.

    2. Re:Don't most still require that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're the exact kind of prick that drive cell phone salesmen up a wall. You act like "Oh noes, if I give out mah social someone might want to STEAL MY IDENTITY!!!" No one gives a shit about you. Cause, ya see.... companies need to check on if you're a deadbeat asshole. Which you probably are. Cell phones, car financiers, student loans, bank accounts, credit cards... The only consistent way of identifying someone... is your SSN. Drivers License numbers can change if you move, there can be multiple people with the same full name... so how do you propose they do it?

      At least you acknowledge that there's a deposit/more to pay up front.

      Such is the price of being a pain in the ass to everyone you meet.

    3. Re:Don't most still require that? by hyperstation · · Score: 0

      no, wrong. i just want to make it harder for you to find my bad credit. i may even give you a false SSN (oops). pretty much everyone needs a phone, you know. even those of us who make plenty of money but have shitty credit creeping up on us from our reckless youth.

  31. Who came up with these prices? by CompMD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I get 750 minutes, free nights/weekends, unlimited data (EVDO), and insurance (if the phone dies or starts acting weird, I get a new one at no charge) for $68.00/month from Sprint, and the HTC 6700 will do just about everything the iPhone does, is easily hackable, can be safely overclocked, has a wide variety of compatible software, has an easy to develop for platform (Windows Mobile), and it will even run linux.

    And Apple/AT&T want the general public to pay HOW much for WHAT again?

    I can't wait to laugh at my friend's iPhone when he gets it.

    1. Re:Who came up with these prices? by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Problem is you are using a check list style comparison. While sometimes these are useful let clearly indicate a case when they are not.

      Bentley Vs My Car (VW Passat)

      Both have 4 doors. Tie
      Both Seat 5 People. Tie
      Both drive on the same roads and get the passengers from A to B. Tie
      Fuel Consumption. My car is better. Win my car
      Price. My car is about 1/10th the price. Win my car
      Speed, the Bentley is faster although given both a limited most of the time by the law and traffic conditions. Just win for the Bentley
      Space. Win Bentley
      Insurance cost. Win my car.

      So is my car better then a Bentley. Nope although it is better value then a Bentley. It also doesn't go into all the little detail that make a Bentley better quality of finish etc. just like you fail to mention the experience of using the iPhone.

    2. Re:Who came up with these prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but, it's an Apple

    3. Re:Who came up with these prices? by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      the HTC 6700 will do just about everything the iPhone does

      Except make calls outside of the USA and Canada in places that use GSM. That's kind of important to some of us and iPhone will do that.

    4. Re:Who came up with these prices? by jaysones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I couldn't build that plan out on the Sprint website. I can get 900 minutes for $59.99 but Unlimited EVDO for that phone is $39.99 (called "Unlimited Data Plan for Phone as Modem"), Insurance is $7 (called "Total Equipment Protection"). That is $106.98 per month by my math.

      I assume you get no text messages since you didn't mention that but with Sprint those are 300 for $5 or unlimited for $10. Oh, and of course the phone which (subsidized) is still $400.

      Can you help us out on how to get your deal?

    5. Re:Who came up with these prices? by SnowDog74 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not to be a picker of nits... but the Bentley's insurance isn't necessarily more expensive.

      Contrary to popular belief, insurance rates are determined by the frequency/cost of medical claims far more than the cost of auto body repair work... because medical claims are, by comparison, astronomical.

      Case in point: I paid slightly less insurance on a Mercedes Benz than I am paying on my VW... the Benz performs better in 40mph frontal offset crash tests with little or no intrusion into the cabin. The Benzes are tanks... I've seen footage of two 100mph crashes on the Autobahn where the occupants of the vehicle got up and walked away.

      I don't know the case with the Bentley specfically, but it is very possible that the insurance rates could be less given the number of safety features typical of luxury vehicles.

    6. Re:Who came up with these prices? by jhRisk · · Score: 1

      The 6700 is a UTStarcom product used by multiple carriers including Cingular/AT&T who call it an 8125... or they're newer 8525.

      --
      That's just my POV... no more, no less.
    7. Re:Who came up with these prices? by hxnwix · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it would be nice if Microsoft's win mobile SDK availability forced Apple to follow suit.

      Then we could have a phone that's both open and without a horrid API + terrible screen redraw issues. (No backing store? It's not 1989, guys.)

    8. Re:Who came up with these prices? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Sprint will give you better deals that are not advertised the longer you stay with them. They also have a set of plans that are not advertised which are used to keep customers from leaving (retention plans). Whatever you see is usually negotiable, you just have to actively negotiate. And yes, I do get 100 SMS messages included with the unlimited data option.

      If you want to use the phone in GSM areas, there are HTC OMAP based phones that are very similar to the 6700 (although with slower CPUs) that have every feature of the 6700 and are GSM/EDGE compatible. I have a friend who uses his on T-Mobile here in the US and has no problem using it in India.

      I'm impressed that I said "it even runs linux!" and still got modded flamebait.

    9. Re:Who came up with these prices? by hxnwix · · Score: 1

      Of course there's a GSM version (8125 aka wizard) of the CDMA-only apache (6700).

      However, this guy's phone is a 6700, so it's probably CDMA ;-)

    10. Re:Who came up with these prices? by jaysones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An unadvertised, negotiated loyalty deal isn't really the same as these AT&T plans.

    11. Re:Who came up with these prices? by the_wesman · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm not fucking around anymore - the next time someone says "my bla bla bla does JUST ABOUT everything the iPhone does" I'm going to smack him/her - cut it - your phone doesn't do dick compared to the iPhone - it's not about you being a feature douchebag or a nerd - quite simply: the iPhone isn't for you because you don't get it - just because you don't get it doesn't mean anyone wants to hear about your problems

      --
      calling all destroyers
    12. Re:Who came up with these prices? by CompMD · · Score: 1

      No, a loyalty plan isn't the same as these AT&T plans. Does AT&T have plans like this for current customers who want an iPhone? The guy I work with who is getting an iPhone doesn't seem to think there are, but I'd hardly consider him an authority on the subject. The bottom line is that it doesn't appear that AT&T and Apple have any qualms screwing the fanboys and early adopters for a product that has been kept so secret that nobody even knows how well it works.

      I don't think any wireless company is ethical in the US, but AT&T is certainly well known to be abusive and unethical, and people are going to flock to them anyway. People have questioned the value of Apple hardware relative to its cost for decades, the iPhone will similarly be questioned.

    13. Re:Who came up with these prices? by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Evidently, AT&T allows any plan (even existing ones) to be used with iPhones, these are just their suggested ones. If your friend has a good deal, that would migrate over to the phone. These rates seem perfectly fair to me in comparison with other wireless companies' rates and the price of the phone is competitive to the HTC you named earlier. How are Apple and AT&T "screwing the fanboys?"

    14. Re:Who came up with these prices? by twitchingbug · · Score: 1

      Well, a Benz doesn't save everyone.

      Of course, being drunk, driving at high speeds, and not wearing your seatbelts, isn't exactly Mercedes' fault.

    15. Re:Who came up with these prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPhone is a phone. It makes and receives phone calls, sends and receives e-mails and SMS, and has an iPod tacked in.

      It does nothing existing phones don't do except integrates it into one package. You're a dumbass for acting like the iPhone is going to come down from heaven and give you a blowjob as soon as his Steveness releases it.

    16. Re:Who came up with these prices? by DrCode · · Score: 1

      But "better" is purely a matter of opinion, and mine is that your car is definitely better. If someone gave me a Bentley, I'd sell it and buy a Passat or something similar in that price range.

      BTW, by "faster", do you mean top speed or acceleration? I thought Bentley made big luxury cars; and if that's the case, the VW might accelerate faster (which to me would make it a lot more fun to drive).

    17. Re:Who came up with these prices? by CavemanKiwi · · Score: 1

      While it is a matter of opinion. I was attempting to illustrate a point that I could use a check list on features alone and the cheaper option would seem better. I picked the Bentley as most people think of them as high end.

      As for speed I was guessing. I have always thought of a Bentley as high priced Rolls Royce with a turbo engine. But here is some info for two cars a Bentley sedan and the current Passat (I currently have the older Passat) that state that Bentley is faster in top speed and acceleration.

      http://www.autozine.org/html/Bentley/Continental_S pur.html
      http://www.autozine.org/html/Volkswagen/Passat.htm l

      Personally my favorite car at the moment is the Lotus Elise. But it lacks the practicality I need :(

    18. Re:Who came up with these prices? by burndive · · Score: 1

      Clearly, then, you are not the target market for a Bentley. It would not be "better" for you to get one.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    19. Re:Who came up with these prices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having owned three Range Rovers in the last few years, two of which were brand new and $80+K, a $90+K Jaguar, and assorted other high-end cars, I can say that you're not quite right on the insurance. The price of the car definitely plays a part, since they (the insurance company) are assuming the risk for replacing your car should it become irreparably damaged. A Bentley would cost a bit more to insure for this reason alone, although the breakdowns for personal injury / property damage (others' property) would be the same or less.

    20. Re:Who came up with these prices? by RowanS · · Score: 1

      To pick another nit on the first nit...

      That may be right in the US but I'd guess from the poster's username that he's a New Zealander, where awards for injury are orders of magnitude lower than in the US.

    21. Re:Who came up with these prices? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular belief, insurance rates are determined by the frequency/cost of medical claims far more than the cost of auto body repair work... because medical claims are, by comparison, astronomical.

      Car insurance pays for medical claims? Will my medical insurance pay to repair my car if it's damaged in an accident? I'm not calling bullshit on you, just commenting on how fucked up things are. Of course, now that most people use medical insurance as some sort of magical pay-for-all-my-medical-expenses-for-less-money-tha n-they-cost machine, I guess you need something else to pay for emergency medical expenses.

      Isn't the ability of your car to kill other people also a factor? And...a bigger factor (as that goes into your LIABILITY insurance?)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  32. What? by dharbee · · Score: 1

    "It will be interesting to see whether AT&T will unlock the phone on request, as they do for other GSM phones (for international travel and prepaid SIMs), and if that is the case, how well other carriers' networks work with iPhone (obviously sans things like Visual Voicemail)."

    This runs contrary to everything I've read, heard, and personally experienced with unlocking a phone from AT&T (Cingular). Has their policy changed recently? All evidence I have indicates you must wait 90 days before they will unlock a phone.

    1. Re:What? by kchrist · · Score: 1

      You're both right. Cingular will unlock a phone upon request after 90 days of service. T-Mobile has the same policy. I don't know what AT&T's pre-Cingular policy was.

  33. Very reasonable... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Can this bring to an end the theory the phones are, in fact subsidized? $60 is a reasonable price IMHO for voice plus unlimited data. I don't really use the phone part of my phone that often, so the plan is perfect.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Very reasonable... by Keeper · · Score: 1

      The $60 plan is the "hook" to make their pricing look reasonable; I couldn't find a comparable plan anywhere that had such a low number of minutes. Honestly, $60 for 8 hours of voice chat? Are you only supposed to charge the phone once a month?

      The other plans costs about $10-$30 more per month than you can get elsewhere... For example, 1500 minutes + unlimited data is $80/mo with t-mobile.

    2. Re:Very reasonable... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can this bring to an end the theory the phones are, in fact subsidized?

      I don't see why it should. The iPhone service pricing seems pretty much on par with similar offerings for other handsets and carriers (except Verizon, who deigns to charge two arms, a leg, and several teeth).

      The carriers' goal is to get as much money from each service contract as they can. Maybe in cases where the handset cost is subsidized, the carrier doesn't have much of a profit margin; but that should not be taken to mean that a non-subsidized handset would mean the carrier would charge less for service. They'd continue to charge what everyone else is charging, and just keep as profit whatever doesn't go towards handset subsidies.

    3. Re:Very reasonable... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Can this bring to an end the theory the phones are, in fact subsidized?


      Why? When I get a free phone from AT&T and use those very same plans, would you say AT&T is giving away phones?
    4. Re:Very reasonable... by CaptCanuk · · Score: 1

      Certainly seems very reasonable. Read http://www.standandcount.com/index.php/iphone-rate -plans-announced-14 for more analysis on the plans.

      --
      ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  34. 74GB capacity? by berj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice this screenshot in the video?

    http://bayimg.com/LAcLFaabd

    It shows an iPhone with 75GB of storage. Earlier in the video they show the storage as 8GB.

    Any speculation as to a hard drive version becoming available sometime soon?

    1. Re:74GB capacity? by *weasel · · Score: 1

      It's just a typo in the presentation.
      Scan up the image a bit and you'll see the device is still listed as an iPhone with 7.4GB capacity.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    2. Re:74GB capacity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something this obvious like this would not get past the Apple security men. Apple would of taken it down or fixed it up already had it not wanted it there. I am complete positive that this was done on purpose. Then again I could just be talking out of my spectrum. (FYI, the catcha I got was the word spectrum.)

    3. Re:74GB capacity? by berj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a heck of a typo because all the math on the sub-capacities works out.

      My guess is that it's not a higher capacity iPhone that's being shown here (by mistake) but rather that this style of syncing/reporting will become available for existing iPods and this screen shot slipped in.

    4. Re:74GB capacity? by Organic+User · · Score: 1

      It seems like Apple has spotted it and fixed the video.

    5. Re:74GB capacity? by jpkunst · · Score: 1
  35. No free nights & weekends? by beef+curtains · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free nights & weekends seem to be a staple among wireless plans...but I don't see any mention of it in the iPhone plans.

    I have free nights & weekends with AT&T now (which start at 7pm, which usually costs $10/mo. extra, but they threw me a bone to apologize for some chronically lousy service a while back...normally they start at 9pm, I believe)...but since I rarely exceed 300 minutes/month, not having them isn't much of a deal-breaker for me.

    However, I don't understand why they wouldn't include that feature in the iPhone plans...they're already including unlimited data use, why not just throw in some unlimited voice use during off hours, like they do with all their "normal" plans? Would that break the bank, or are they afraid all their anticipated new customers will overwhelm their systems?

    Like I said, this doesn't affect me too much, but it does strike me as a big odd.

    --
    Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    1. Re:No free nights & weekends? by Therlin · · Score: 1

      The lowest plan has 5000 nights and weekends. The other 2 plans have unlimited nights and weekends.

    2. Re:No free nights & weekends? by mstra · · Score: 1
      If you look at this chart, there ARE free nights and weekends...sort of.

      The $59.99 includes 5000 night and weekend minutes. The other two plans include unlimited nights and weekends.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    3. Re:No free nights & weekends? by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      I just took a second look at the chart - you are 100% correct.

      Clearly I need to brush up on my literacy skills.

      Thanks for pointing out my mistake without flaming me :)

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    4. Re:No free nights & weekends? by tfoss · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you are looking, but according to Apple, the *only* plan w/o unlimited N&W is the cheapest one, and it has 5000 N&W minutes. Every other plan (and all family plans) has unlimited.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    5. Re:No free nights & weekends? by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      I went back & looked at it after Therlin responded & pointed it out...clearly my mad reading comprehension skillz failed me this morning :)

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    6. Re:No free nights & weekends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free nights & weekends seem to be a staple among wireless plans...but I don't see any mention of it in the iPhone plans.

      Well then sparky, maybe you should RTFA because it's got a nice chart at the end...

  36. Re:For the Love of Money by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Informative
    "You want me to spend a minimum of $59.99/mo. + $499 for an iPhone? "

    I dunno what the big deal is. In the US, you buy a phone and you're signing a 1 or 2 year contract, that is the norm here.

    My phone with SprintPCS is about $80/mo, unlimited nights and weekends...I think about 1000 anytime minutes, SMS is extra, but, I don't use that much, nor do I ever come close to the daytime minutes. I have the full Vision plan...unlimited data, picture mail...and since I 'unlocked' the bluetooth modem capabilities in my Samsung A900...I can tether it to my laptop as needed.

    The latter point, is the main reason I'm not going with the iPhone in Jan. when my current contract is up. It isn't price, it is the stated fact that iPhone will NOT allow tethering to a laptop as a modem as part of their 'unlimited' data plan.

    The price and monthly cost is no big deal to me....but, I want my tethering capability.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  37. 74 GB iPhone by jdigital · · Score: 1

    Heh. It appears that there is a little bug in the presentation video. Once the presenter has loaded everything onto the phone, the iTunes space utilization bar shows that the phone has 74GB of capacity. WTF? see http://blog.i2pi.com/2007/06/26/iphone-74gb-model/ for photos.

    --
    :wq ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    1. Re:74 GB iPhone by assantisz · · Score: 1

      I don't think they actually sync'ed with an iPhone in that video. It's probably an external hard drive or an emulator or what not.

    2. Re:74 GB iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they actually sync'ed with an iPhone in that video. It's probably an external hard drive or an emulator or what not. Yeah... I don't think Steve would let his marketing team touch a real iPhone... that thing is like gold.
  38. You will let us know when ... by Skapare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, people aren't interested in this?

    Sure, I am interested. This news indicates a minor step towards making the iPhone viable for me.

    No, I don't "want" anyone to do anything, other than know that plans have been released for iPhone.

    You will let us know when the iPhone is finally made available unlocked so that we can use it with any carrier of choice, and when plans are available with no time periods for those who buy the whole phone up front, and when Apple finally releases the codes to allow us to develop and deploy our own applications, right? Be sure to let your buddy Steve know that we are waiting.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  39. Don't believe the hype by bjourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The amount of iPhone articles are rediculous. I don't really care much for a new phone that has weaker specs than existing phones that has been on the market for months. So the iPhone has a touchscreen instead of buttons, whoopiedoo! That should not earn it seven articles per week. Every week. The real story is not the iPhone, it is how Apple has managed to buy every tech related media outlet out there to run articles about the iPhone for them.

    1. Re:Don't believe the hype by catdevnull · · Score: 1

      Quit trolling slashdot, Steve Ballmer....

      --

      I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    2. Re:Don't believe the hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Shame the fanboys will continue to mark you as a troll for pointing out the simple truth.

      I'm utterly sick of the iPhone slashvertisements.

    3. Re:Don't believe the hype by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Jobs didn't buy any media, he doesn't have to.

      This is a result of Apple's secrecy.

      Apple's Secrecy has gotten it's products on the cover of time. You literally can not buy that space.

      Coupled with the fact that it makes some cool products, and you have 10's of millions of dollars of free 'mind space'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Don't believe the hype by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      There have been a lot of articles about the iPhone, but they make sense in light of the industry's past and Apple's in particular. When the iPod came out, every criticism you've leveled at the iPhone could have been said about the iPod. The iPod took a previously rather small market and expanded it rapidly, taking a huge market share in a now much larger market. If the same happens with phones that are more than phones (a market that's still relatively small and untapped), it will be a big deal. Given where the smart phone market is now and what Apple did with the portable music player, it makes sense to keep an eye on the iPhone.

    5. Re:Don't believe the hype by bjourne · · Score: 1

      Media always like to portray themselves as "neutral observers." Merely reporting about stuff that is interesting and newsworthy. There is no hype about the iPhone, except for the one created by the trade press. The price plan for a mobile phone locked to one carrier and only available in the US, is not Slashdot first page stuff. Except for the stupid media-created snowballing hype which makes every detail a major event and everyone who disagrees is a troll. The Wii enjoyed a similar, albeit lesser, hype. And yes, it was and is a decent gaming system but it's not close to as earth-shatteringly awesome as the hype would have you believe.

      At this point it doesn't matter if the iPhone is utter garbage or not. It will sell and it will sell good, all thanks to the hype. Just read all those testimonies in the comments that say they will buy the phone, without even having seen the device in real life! And that is from slashdotters, supposedly nerds, supposedly knowledgable about technology. If "we" can't see through it, then the general public definitely cannot either. Hype is what makes or breaks a new product, and Slashdot has done a great job of providing it. Jobs must be grateful.

  40. waste of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    guess i'll just have to carry both my ipod and razr...and wait till i'm home to watch the latest youtube video. Stupid people, $600 phone.

  41. There's method to that madness... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Informative


    IIRC they have a blurb in the TOS of the $20 plan saying you may not use the handset as a modem and they certainly do their damnedest to try and prevent you from using that feature, though basic GPRS is pretty crap on their network. I just got a 3G data card and they want $50/month for "unlimited" data for that.

    I wonder if the SIM card trick would work on it. I mean, they had to assign it a telephone number (quoi?), so methinks they might not be able to tell the difference.

    1. Re:There's method to that madness... by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      The SIM card and account are tied to the phone's IMEI on a GSM phone. The phone number simply carries over on the card--but the SIM-hardware interface is via the IMEI, which is reported to the network when a call is made. You can usually switch your card into a new phone because carriers don't usually monitor that the account and IMEI match. So sure, you can switch SIM cards in your handsets (after activating the iPhone), but if activation is tied to the phone IMEI, which seems likely, you'll still have to activate on the provided SIM card, so you'll still have to pay the cancellation fee to unload the iPhone account.

  42. But they're Apple minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're much easier to use than regular minutes, and they look a hundred times cooler.

    bkd

  43. Re:For the Love of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTH?

  44. Rate plans are good indeed by Uksi · · Score: 1

    This is indeed a pretty good plan.

    Compare this to my Cingular $40/mo for 450 mins, then $40/mo for unlimited data and 1500 text messages for my Blackberry Pearl. That's $80/mo for a Blackberry user. (OK, I get a corp discount, so it's really $68/mo for me).

    With Cingular's rollover feature, 450 minutes is plenty... I have some several thousand rollover minutes.

  45. iPhone by certel · · Score: 1

    I don't think the iPhone can be unlocked or I wouldn't even worry about it. One of the big features of the iPhone is the visual voicemail and that wouldn't work with any other providers. One of course, can choose not to use that function and be happy with the phone but what's the point?

  46. mo2mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been my experience with Cingular (now AT&T) that when I call my friends with prepaid phones like tracphone, I do not get charged anything, they expanded m2m , it's m2mc.
    Also, AT&T announce the unity plan... free calls to and from at&t landlines, I look forward to finding out if Iphone plans include this as option or feature.
    P.S. Don't forget about rollover minutes people. my 39.95 plan w/ 450 RO minutes is plenty for my taste. Take it easy the first month, then you can use as normal. Here in San Antonio, Tx, coverage is excellent.
    Off topic, I used to love T-mobile, but they slammed me into a new contract, and it took Hours arguing with them. Once I learned of then Cingular's rollover minutes, and my then employer using Cingular for the entire workforce, It was an easy decision... now I'm out of contract, but still with them...just wish I had cash for this phone and Data.

  47. kudos to Apple... and AT&T by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 0

    AT&T deserves some credit for this novel approach to phone activation. They obviously had to work with Apple to provide an interface betwixt the companies and their computer systems.

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:kudos to Apple... and AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have SprintPCS. I've activated phones via an automatted call to Sprint CS, an actual voice call to Sprint CS, online via a web page, and in a Sprint store. Each method took no more then 5 minutes. I do not believe they offer activation via the Sprint web site any longer though. It is not a novel idea at all. Well I guess since you do it via iTunes directly , Sprint has never offered that specific method but I assume it uses your web browser any way.

  48. + unlimited data + SMS by Uksi · · Score: 1

    Core 450 minute plan is $40/mo, so the $20/mo extra is unlimited data + 200 SMS. I recently was paying $10/mo for 1MB data and 400 SMS.

    1. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they can't have unlimited SMS if they are providing "unlimited" data service. The only reason for placing a cap on minutes is the long term nature of voice conversation. SMS are transmitted in a fraction of a second and consume no significant network capacity compared to general purpose data consumption.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    2. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by Specter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So here's my problem with these pricing plans: they're basically unchanged from the commercial available plans available for any mobile phone.

      That's a problem because in the US the service plans include a premium to recover the carrier's cost of subsidizing the handsets. (Which is also the ostensible reason there's an early termination fee.)

      Only there's no subsidy on the iPhone. So our monthly plan rates should be lower, right?

      Fortunately for AT&T no one seems to have noticed...

    3. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      SMS transfers are done on the same protocol layer as the call connections. That's why they're limited & more expensive. That's also why they're so limited in length.

    4. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by allanc · · Score: 1

      Because they can charge you extra for SMS.

    5. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by burndive · · Score: 1

      Then they should update the protocol to account for text messaging. That's a silly way to implement a small asynchronous data packet transfer. With unlimited data, there's no reason not to send any text messages that I would send through e-mail or a Safari widget designed for just such a purpose.

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    6. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by trentblase · · Score: 1

      I imagine peering and termination have something to do with it -- voice calls and SMS might eventually travel to another network and incur a termination fee. But internet data doesn't work quite the same way (there are peering issues, but I think those contracts are limited more by transmission rate than data transfer).

    7. Re:+ unlimited data + SMS by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Yes but you need to remain backwards compatible to more primitive phones.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  49. Compare it to The Helio Ocean by homeslice3 · · Score: 1
    • 500 minutes voice
    • Unlimited Data
    • Unlimited Text
    • GoogleMaps/GPS
    60 Bucks a month.

    I have a 2 Gig SD card and I've basically use my phone as a (large) shuffle.. Granted the iPhone is cooler, and UI is better. Larger screen. ect.

    I'm happy with my phone and Helio's service (so far) has been good. I use the maps/gps/direction thing almost every day - not nearly a true GPS, but I'm able to do the directions things in the car (no, not while i'm driving) or in a bar looking for the next place to hit up.

    So no complaints. I don't think i'd shell out so much for the iphone - i think when my helio plan expires in 22 months, the iphones will be much cheaper and the rest of the marketplace will be forced to raise the bar - so my choices should be good.

  50. Beware... cingular/AT&T has the worse service. by kinglink · · Score: 1

    I know all cellular carriers are asses and try to screw you, but AT&T took special pride with this. In 3 years I was with them I never got a correct bill, buying the phone added tons of new options, next month I complained about options I didn't want, then I got others that I didn't want. Why would I get equipment coverage on a 20 dollar phone when the deductible is 20 dollars?

    After a while I gave up on this because I had called 6 times and each time I never got a satisfactory resolution, then they joined with Cingular, I tried to solve my bill again, thinking the change would improve service, (haha)finally they started putting random servicecharges from companies I never did business with (such as downloading ring tones or such). Telling them about it got that charge removed for the next month (they claimed they couldn't do anything about the month before), and the next month I got two new charges on my bill, plus some unnecessary plans that I never asked for.

    After 2 years of being screwed I tried to cancel the contact. That took almost 6 months to cancel correctly because apparently I was in a contract even though I pointed out that the contract was up, they claimed I signed a second one. Don't remember that. They finally relented after 6 months (during which I stopped paying of course and was on Tmobile. Oh yeah and they sounded so worried that my cell phone service was terminated, funny that.) and gave me a free disconnect. Sounds good until the next month I got another bill, Then I was hounded for that bill for another 4 months which phone calls going to them explaining that I didn't even use the phone and I had canceled it. You'd think this is the end. Now they claim they owe me 6 dollars, and are unwilling to "forget it" so they send me a 5 page bill every month informing me of this. Since then I've moved.

    I had a 40 dollar plan, I never paid under 50 dollars (one month it was 70, they did give me partial refunds that month) before taxes. I never had a correct bill, I had over 20 calls into their service department, and every time they claimed to have it right. Since leaving them I went to Tmobile, I have yet to have an incorrect bill. So while they claim these prices I'm beyond skeptical, because AT&T likes to screw the customer because they are the biggest, and they can get away with it.

    BTW I don't care if you got perfect service, that's great, however this is one occurrence where a customer was completely screwed by that carrier, and I'm far from the only one. Though I'm sure I got one of the worse "packages".

  51. Handled on the network by snowwrestler · · Score: 4, Funny

    With only Safari as the platform for 3rd party apps, there is a much smaller set of APIs to secure against a malicious app essentially being able to spy on every phone call, email;

    Not an issue; that functionality is already handled by AT&T.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  52. Re:Definite articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I see in Lunaya Pravda that Luna City Council has passed on first reading a bill to examine, license, inspect -- and tax -- public food vendors operating inside municipal pressure."

  53. But do believe the reality. by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Apple hasn't paid any tech sites to report on anything. This is genuine demand for information about the device. And for the last time it doesn't MATTER that there are other devices out there with better specs if the interface is ASS.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:But do believe the reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just the thing though: Apple's interface gives 0 tactile feedback. In a phone, especially one people will stupidly be tapping SMSes in to while driving and having to look at the thing, that's a big no-no.

      Sure it's pretty, whiz-bang, and neato... but does it truly advance using a portable phone device? Not really.

    2. Re:But do believe the reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apple's interface gives 0 tactile feedback."

      Used one already have you? I doubt it. You're just another apple hater who is quick to criticize ANY product they produce, even before you have even used one yourself.

    3. Re:But do believe the reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that is what makes pocket PC's so awesome. You can change the interface to whatever you want.

      Here is a link to get you started:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkh0sWc7JW8

      Also while you are at it you can check out DeepFish which is a new browser
      for the pocket PC that is very simular to that of what Apple is offering in
      Safari.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pwwzQPRHrk

      Want an IPOD Interface to play music on your Pocket PC check it out here:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWClnacPKRM

      (Yes this works)

  54. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    I'm not a huge Apple fanboy, but part of the reason is that Microsoft is a convicted monopolist, and another part of the reason is that Microsoft software is so horrible that only a masochist would want to be locked into it whereas with Apple it's a mixed bag.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  55. iPhone + Laptop? by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone read anywhere if you can use the iPhone as a generic internet source via bluetooth/802.11 for a laptop or something like that? If it has unlimited data, it'd be nice to be able to pair it up with my laptop and get on the net from a "real" computer if I need to while I'm on the road and can't find a wifi hotspot. (Note.. I currently don't have a fancy-pants cell phone with data capability, so I'm a bit out of the loop on this kind of thing and I'm not sure if that feature is "normal" or not on these kinds of smart phones...)

    1. Re:iPhone + Laptop? by jagdish · · Score: 1

      iPhone + Laptop
      .
      .
      iTop

    2. Re:iPhone + Laptop? by hotgigs · · Score: 1

      You found the reason Palm launched the Treo + Foleo (Fooleo). Increase shield +2.

      Seriously though, that would be nice if it can do it.

      --
      I'm not clever enough for a sig...
    3. Re:iPhone + Laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I believe it can access the internet via WiFi when it is within range.
      I'm pretty sure that's how the demonstrations showed it loading web pages so fast.

    4. Re:iPhone + Laptop? by Gompers · · Score: 1

      I believe somewhere up in the comments someone said it will NOT be capable of this.

      I've been doing it personally since the Kyocera 6035 days, though back then the data was SLOW. Back then it was via a serial cable, but since I moved to the Treo 650 I've been able to do it via bluetooth. There are quite a few other phones that I'm aware of that you can use as modems. To do it legit, though, most carriers require an additional service plan. It's come in handy plenty of times though. Being able to VPN into the network to fix stuff from a parking lot in the middle of nowhere can come in handy from time to time.

  56. re: Treo 650, etc. by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, yeah.... I did the same thing, and had a Kyocera 7135 before it, even. Both times, I was convinced the phone was finally "good enough" at running useful apps that I'd do a lot more with it than than make/take calls. Both times, I was wrong.

    But you have to admit, the iPhone looks FAR more capable than any of these other "smartphones". With my Treo 650, for example, my web browsing experience was a total joke. Most sites I tried to pull up simply crashed the browser with some kind of exception error. Other times, they worked, but had the links scattered all over the screen, making it almost impossible to figure out which part of the site they even corresponded with.

    I remember, for example, going car shopping and taking my Treo with me, with the idea that I could quickly look up some used-car blue-book prices on Edmunds or Kelly Blue Book's web site. Nope... just futile!

    It also appears it has a functional/useful built-in camera. Of course it's not going to stack up well against a good quality digital stand-alone camera, but sample photos circulating on the net sure look far better than the dark, dingy or blurry results I got out of my Moto Razr or Treo cameras!

    The Google map integration of the iPhone looks like a very useful feature too. You can get directions to a restaurant or hotel, for example, and then dial the number to the place with a tap on the screen. I never had anything that worked nearly as well on my Treo. (I remember having a couple 411 directory type applets for it to find phone numbers of places, but half the time, they'd just come back with some kind of "service unavailable" message when I tried to use them.)

  57. Dave, all you've done is bum me out... by chaboud · · Score: 1

    So the iPhone won't do Exchange push email, leaving it out for me, but I pay more for my contract with Cingular, don't get SMS for free, and am also stuck with EDGE data (there is only one clamshell WM device, and it is EDGE).

    I have to admit to being somewhat curious as to whether I can just pop my SIM into the iPhone and party, but I'm not really prepared to pay that kind of dough until I see how things unfold.

    And, of course, don't sweat the trolls.

    1. Re:Dave, all you've done is bum me out... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      ...and am also stuck with EDGE data (there is only one clamshell WM device, and it is EDGE).

      Don't feel bad. The iPhone isn't a clamshell, so you wouldn't want it anyway. Or, conversely, if you would accept the iPhone then you could also accept a non-clamshell WM device.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Dave, all you've done is bum me out... by Amouth · · Score: 1

      if you want something that works well with exchange push email i recommend droping the clamshell and going with the 8525 - it is well worth it (although i do wish the battrie lasted longer but it does last long enough)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  58. Re:For the Love of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat cat sconnie? lol, that's hilarious. I'm from Wisconsin and went to Madison so I gotta remember that one.

  59. Keeping your number when changing carriers? by bedmison · · Score: 1

    Looking at PR stuff, I can't find anything about keeping your number if you are changing carriers. I thought they had to support this. Am I mistaken? I'm considering taking the iPlunge when my verizon contract ends, but if I can't keep my number, moving to AT&T/cingular/etc is kind of a non-starter. How can/could Apple/ATT handle this in iTunes, anyway?

    1. Re:Keeping your number when changing carriers? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There probably isn't in documentation on the fact that you speak into one end and listen from the other.

      Probably doesn't say anywhere that it can access land line either.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Keeping your number when changing carriers? by MatchbooksAndSarcasm · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're in the united states, then you can keep your phone #. Number portability is a federally mandated requirement, IIRC.

    3. Re:Keeping your number when changing carriers? by Hebetsubeach · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll find the explanation as to how to transfer your phone numbers from other carriers on this page http://www.apple.com/iphone/usingiphone/activation .html.

  60. Two Year Contract? by thebonafortuna · · Score: 1

    I can't believe Cingular, or AT&T, or at&t, of Cellular One, or whatever the hell these people are calling themselves today, has the audacity to actually demand a two year contract for a phone which they subsidize nothing.

    The subsidized phone is supposed to be the great appeal to signing up for a contract - you get a phone that normally costs a few hundred dollars for nothing, or, at the very least, for a significant discount. While I did read they (Cingular - at the time) wanted to subsidize the phone, and it was Jobs who wouldn't allow it, that still does not justify such a steep price tag, while at the same time locking you into a contract you cannot get out of for a few years.

    I worked at Cingular as a sales person a few years ago when the Razr came out, and I was shocked by the $500 - $600 price tag the phone came with. While it looked cool, I couldn't imagine anybody actually spending that kind of money for an otherwise basic flip phone. Boy was I proven wrong. The kicker to all this, of course, was that one couldn't actually purchase phone insurance for the Razr, due to its high price.

    While I don't know if theft will be an issue for the iPhone, I certainly assume it will be. I also know there is no chance in hell I would ever even consider spending $600 on a phone, and also have a two year service contract shoved into my nether regions along side it. Cingular customer service is desperate to keep customer out of, or nearly out of their contracts. Two years? Good luck is something goes wrong.

    Me? If I'm going to spend $600 on a tech device, I'll get a Playstation 3 and enjoy having a blu-ray player, and be even happier that it upscales my DVD's to 1080p. Sure, there's very few games for it now. But unless you're the kind of unintelligent basher whom can't see past their blinding disdain for Sony, you know they'll come out with some great games in the future. Personally, I would rather put my money there, and let the iPhone be damned. If Jobs is so arrogant he decides AT&T can't subsidize a cell phone, screw him. He will never get my business.

    Give me my laptop and my W810i any day.

  61. Re:Why stop there? Get a third job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of buying an iPhone, purchase a Playstation 3! It's only 99 US dollars more than the price of an iPhone and if you factor in the price of the lowest plan, you can afford a new game each month! We promise to make some fun games really soon now.

    Of course you won't be able to call your friends and tell them about how much fun your new PS3 is without a phone. We are working on that and it will be coming on the Playstation Network after the new and exicting way way better than PS2 or Xbox 360 games come out.

    Your friend,
    Kaz Hirai

  62. PDA plan by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Honestly, $60 for 8 hours of voice chat?

    Yes, and unlimited data...

    I want the phone more as a PDA than a phone; I will not even come close to using the minutes offered. But I will make use of the unlimited data aspect, even with using it on WiFi fairly often in addition to the cell network.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by neuroklinik · · Score: 0, Troll

    Vendor lock-in... thy name is Apple. Stupidest comment I've read all day.

    You don't have dealings with many companies, do you?

    Apple is the picture of openness compared to some.
  64. Unlimited Data by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Unlimited data, hummm.

    While it's actually rather limited due to the slow 2.5EDGE system, does this mean you can buy minimum minutes and VoIP your calls all month? Enquiring minds and all that yada yada.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  65. question... by fattmatt · · Score: 0

    How much does the killer app cost?

  66. This is purchase-influencing info by BrianRagle · · Score: 1

    I'm glad this kind of information is finally getting out. I am definitely someone who is willing to plunk down the kind of cash needed for the iPhone and was even prepared to do this coming weekend with a trip to Fairbanks, AK, assuming there would be even be stock of them available. However, I did NOT want to be locked into an AT&T contract given their spotty-at-best coverage in this state.

    I have full faith and confidence that some enterprising young ne'er-do-wells will find the proper workarounds to unlock full functionality of the device and maybe even get it to the point I can slide my Cellular One sim card into it for at least partial functionality on the data side of things.

    I am guessing about a month or so will be my wait time. The $600 in my pocket whimpers a bit, but it will just have to be patient.

  67. Re:For the Love of Money by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

    "YHBT HTH YHL HAND" = You have been trolled. Hope This Helps. You Have Lost. Have A Nice Day.

    --
    +5, Truth
  68. Re:For the Love of Money by hackstraw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My phone with SprintPCS is about $80/mo, unlimited nights and weekends...I think about 1000 anytime minutes, SMS is extra, but, I don't use that much, nor do I ever come close to the daytime minutes.

    I heard the other day on NPR how it was difficult for Apple or any other hardware manufactuer to get into the phone market because of the service cartel. Personally, I think talking about $80/mo as if its nothing is crazy. I pay like $30/mo for my phone and I think I'm getting ripped off (~ 12-15 of that is taxes and fees and other crap).

    I simply don't understand how I can use the internet for $20-40/mo, unlimited "minutes" worldwide access, but talking to someone on the phone frequently costs more?

    To me, in 2007, phone service should be less than $20/mo, but being that people are willing to spend over $100/household for phones, the phone service people will gladly take their money.

  69. Re:For the Love of Money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "To me, in 2007, phone service should be less than $20/mo, but being that people are willing to spend over $100/household for phones, the phone service people will gladly take their money."

    I supposed to an extent, you are right. In my case...since I cut the landline, I don't shell out for that ~$30/mo...so, my cell phone bill is my only phone bill. It doesn't see that expensive to me in that light, and especially due to me not getting charged for LD calls anymore, that was a big drop for me.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  70. OTOH by geekoid · · Score: 1

    unlimited data..and VoIP is data.

    Just sayin'

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:OTOH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VoIP is prohibited according to the TOS

  71. unlimited = limited read the fine print! by gvtech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    unlimited = limited read the fine print! Just like everyone else there is no free lunch: Prohibited and Permissible Uses: Data Service sessions may be conducted only for the following purposes: (i) Internet browsing; (ii) email; and (iii) corporate intranet access (including access to corporate email, customer relationship management, sales force automation, and field service automation applications). Prohibited uses include, but are not limited to, using Services: (i) with server devices or with host computer applications, including, without limitation, Web camera posts or broadcasts, continuous jpeg file transfers, automatic data feeds, telemetry applications, automated functions or any other machine-to-machine applications; (ii) as substitute or backup for private lines or dedicated data connections; (iii) for Voice over IP; (iv) in conjunction with WWAN or other applications or devices which aggregate usage from multiple sources prior to transmission; (V) Using the Services for any activity that adversely affects the ability of other people or systems to use either the Services or other parties' Internet-based resources including, but not limited to excessive consumption of network or system resources (whether intentional or unintentional) and "denial of service" (DoS) attacks against another network host or individual user; or (vi) Interference with or disruption of other network users, network services or network equipment. except for CONTENT formatted in accordance with AT&T's CONTENT standards, Unlimited plans cannot be used for uploading, downloading or streaming of video content (e.g. movies, TV), music or games. Furthermore, unlimited plans (except for DataConnect and Blackberry Tethered) cannot be used for any applications that tether the device (through use of, including without limitation, connection kits, other phone/PDA-to-computer accessories, Bluetooth® or any other wireless technology) to laptops, PCs, or other equipment for any purpose. Service is not intended to provide full-time connections, and the Service may be discontinued after a significant period of inactivity or after sessions of excessive usage. AT&T reserves the right to (i) limit throughput or amount of data transferred, deny Service and/or terminate Service, without notice, to anyone it believes is using the Service in any manner prohibited above or whose usage adversely impacts its network or service levels and (ii) protect its network from harm, which may impact legitimate data flows. You may not send solicitations to AT&T subscribers without their consent. You may not use the Services other than as intended by AT&T and applicable law. Plans are for individual, non-commercial use only and are not for resale. Security: AT&T does not GUARANTEE SECURITY. Data encryption is available with some, but not all, Services sold by AT&T. If you use your device to access company e-mail or information, it is your responsibility to ensure your use complies with your company's internal IT and security procedures. Changes to the terms and conditions: These terms and conditions may be changed from time-to-time. AT&T will post the most current version of these terms and conditions on the MEdia Net web site (www.wireless.att.com/medianet) or other appropriate location. Please check these regularly to inform yourself about changes to the terms and conditions, policies, news, etc.

  72. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by Chrono11901 · · Score: 0

    Cycle of nerd idocy...
    1) Booo company X, company Y is slightly more open!
    2) whoo company Y is now #1!
    3)WTF company Y why are you strengthening your vendor lockin!
    4)X = Y, Y = new company();
    5) go to 1

  73. You can not change sims. by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    The sims are not changable in the iphone. You can not use it on another network apperntly there were changes to the core AT&T network system and this thing doesnt even go through the MAG.

    AT&T has a 5 year contract.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    1. Re:You can not change sims. by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Then its bound to fail like Newton.
      AT&T is a greedy corporate that will stop at nothing to suck you dry.
      Unless Apple allows free purchase of iPhones at its stores at $499 and allowing you to use it on any network it is doomed to fail.
      By SIM locking it to AT&T, Apple risks losing all that it gained so far with iPod.

      Leopard needs to be able to run WINE and enable it to run XP programs natively. This will allow Apple to sell Leopard as a serious competitor to XP and Vista.
      For this, Apple needs the continuing revenues from iPod and its successors.

      By screwing up majorly in iPhone by tying with AT&T, Apple risks its success.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:You can not change sims. by Knara · · Score: 1

      Can you provide source citations for this? (Aside from the 5 year, which seems to be pretty common knowledge)

    3. Re:You can not change sims. by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      Yes, AT&T was a very bad call for Apple to make.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  74. Re: Treo 650, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You can get directions to a restaurant or hotel, for example, and then dial the number to the place with a tap on the screen.

    Several people have said practically this exact same thing to me when I ask about the iPhone. How many times are you driving around looking for a restuarant out of the blue, and upon finding one on your phone (while you're driving?) you need to call them? Uhm, 0 or 1 is the correct answer to this question. Ever. You almost always know where you're going to go eat before you're driving around. If you need directions somewhere, presumably you knew the name of the place before getting in the car. If you're calling for reservations, you're probably not on the way there. This all just seems a little like every other feature; it sounds "so cool" until you realize you'll never need it, or even want it.

  75. Linux users? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    I guess you'll need to have Windows or a Mac somewhere to have a fully functional iPhone...

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:Linux users? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      I guess you'll need to have Windows or a Mac somewhere to have a fully functional iPhone...

      The iTunes requirement certainly seems to do this. Its a shame that AT&T or Apple don't simply provide a traditional web page for this.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  76. Re: Treo 650, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You obviously don't live in a big city, like SF which is the example they used when showing this feature. On a Friday or Saturday night a group of us will meet somewhere, most likely a mass transit hub (wtf is this driving your talking about). Then we will argue for 10 minutes on what type of food we want, then we will start taking names of restaurants serving that type of food in the area. Now it would be great to use the Google maps features of "Thai" "San Francisco" "Cole Valley" and get a list of results. Then being able to call these results with a touch of a button to see if we need a reservation.

    Of course your normal suburbanite need not worry about things like this, but then they are generally a lesser type of person anyway so it is fine by me.

  77. Personal incorporation! by argent · · Score: 1

    So if you want to use your iPhone to access your home server you have to set up a Delaware corporation!? Sheesh.

    1. Re:Personal incorporation! by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I am glad that you, too, are well aware of Delaware.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  78. Shocked! Those are very reasonable by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    I am shocked that these plans come in less expensive than the equivalent plans for other att smartphones.

    I guaranteed that there wouldn't be less expensive plans for iPhone people in previous posts on ./

    I was wrong

    1. Re:Shocked! Those are very reasonable by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I am shocked that these plans come in less expensive than the equivalent plans for other att smartphones.

      They don't. They're the exact same price (well, modulo a difference of a penny) as the equivalent plans for other ATT smartphones. The iPhone plan is just the personal 450 minute plan ($39.99) plus the unlimited smartphone data plan ($19.99).

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  79. We are missing what the story is NOT by Chris+MFM · · Score: 1

    The real news is that there is no iPhone TAX added to the plans. I am relieved that the plans are right in line with other existing plans, give or take minor details. Can you imagine the reaction here and elsewhere if for some reason they were $20 more than regular AT&T plans. I can. And they could have done it if they wanted.

    1. Re:We are missing what the story is NOT by thebonafortuna · · Score: 1

      Maybe...but they would open themselves up to even more scrutiny if they raised their prices, AND failed the subsidize the phone itself. There had to be modicum of fairness built into this pricing, at some point.

      On another note, my guess is that AT&T wanted to have higher prices, and Jobs, in his infinite power, wouldn't let them. He stands to make way more money by getting this unit into the hands of the masses. My guess is that the businessman who pick this thing up aren't too keen on iTunes right now...that could very well change if this thing is as easy to use as past Apple products. And it will be.

  80. No thanks by robert899 · · Score: 1

    The plans are $59.99/mo for 450 minutes, $79.99 for 900 minutes, and $99.99 for 1350 minutes, and all include unlimited data, 200 SMS messages, rollover minutes, and unlimited mobile-to-mobile calling. Any other standard AT&T service plan may also be used.

    I don't care if it came with unlimited blow-jobs. AT&T will never EVER see another dime of my money.

    1. Re:No thanks by j.sanchez1 · · Score: 0

      I don't care if it came with unlimited blow-jobs. AT&T will never EVER see another dime of my money.

      I'd have to say that I'd go back to AT&T/Cingular if that was part of their cell plans.

      --
      Speedy thing goes in; speedy thing comes out.
    2. Re:No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto.

  81. mod parent up by Uksi · · Score: 1

    someone who knows what's up

  82. Re:Beware... cingular/AT&T has the worse servi by rizzo320 · · Score: 1

    I'm not here to defend AT&T, however, I wouldn't say they have the worst customer service. Let's face it, most of the major US cell phone carriers have crappy customer service. I've had Bell Atlantic Mobile, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T Wireless (old), Cingular, and now AT&T (new), and, I have found none of them better or worse than the other. I think I've had my worst experiences with Verizon, when they tried to charge me a termination fee after my contract had expired, and then continued to bill me for three months of service AFTER I had cancelled my service. I've never had a problem with Cingular/AT&T other than long hold times.

    If you like the Apple iPhone, I don't believe signing up with AT&T should hinder your purchase. I stick with AT&T and T-Mobile because I like GSM based phones that don't lock me out doing things with the phone, such as creating and installing a ring tone that I've made from music I already own. That's just my personal preference. I'm not planning on purchasing an iPhone just yet, though, I'd love to have one if I could afford it.

    You're argument is similar to the hard drive debate. How many times have we heard "I had three drives die with xxx brand, so they are the worst, and all I buy is yyy brand...", only to see a responding post with information with the exact opposite opinion.

    So, with AT&T, just like any service/subscription/purchase from a large corporation in the U.S., your mileage may vary.

  83. Breakage and term of contract by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a question.

    With no Obvious discount being offered by AT&T for the service (70 buck plan for 59 if you sign up TODAY) what is the basis of the $175 breakage fee if the phone is not activated for two years?

    In other words, what value are they providing that I must reimburse them for? I would think that the plan would be a two year sign up at a $10 per month discount if you commit to two years, something like this. That way if you were to ever end up in small claims they say We gave the guy $240 bucks all we want is to be made whole.

  84. Re:your URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  85. Hmm... Does Anyone Else... by acoustix · · Score: 1

    ...think that Slashdot or their parent company owns a shit ton of Apple stock? Seriously. I think there's been an iPhone story every day for the last two weeks. Let it go already.

    Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Hmm... Does Anyone Else... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of demand for iPhone information in all media outlets, being a tech site(haha) you will see more of them.

      Considering the approaching launch date, you're going to have to get used to it, or stay away.

      To be fair, this article has new a relevant information, not just some tech reports opinion.

      Sadly, the submitter is using it for Karma whoring.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Hmm... Does Anyone Else... by smack.addict · · Score: 1

      It's called marketing. And this marketing has been masterful.

      Apple has made sure that there is a valid story on the product to be covered every day. People who cover technology have no choice but to cover these valid news items.

    3. Re:Hmm... Does Anyone Else... by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      I think there's been an iPhone story every day for the last two weeks. Let it go already.

      While I agree that the glut of iPhone stories is ridiculous, This particular piece of news (the only thing missing from the glut, prices) is of great interest to millions of geeks, nerds, and technophiles (not to mention the 14 apple fanboys) who will line up on Friday, and as such, warrants a mention on their website of choice.

      Rest assured we still have plenty of space for articles about google.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  86. So essentially by lionforce5 · · Score: 1

    I looked at the Family plan pricing, thinking "oh, $80 isn't too terrible for unlimited data, 700 shared minutes & free mobile to mobile." Until I noticed that they're charging you an extra $30 for every iphone you attach to the family plan. Just to be clear: they jack the price of the regular family plan if even ONE person in the family has an iphone, and then they make you pay 1.5 times the standard extra phone fee, on top of the already jacked phone price, if anyone else wants one as well? At those rates it's almost more beneficial for people in the same family to get individual plans. Yeah, as curious I am about the device, I'm almost glad I'm forced to wait on this one. Maybe by September of next year there will be some sensible plan pricing.

    1. Re:So essentially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says "*Includes one line. Additional iPhone lines are $29.99 each. More SMS text messages can be added to any plan." So if you have one iPhone and one regular non-iPhone, would you have to pay the extra $29.99? That's the question.

    2. Re:So essentially by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An extra non-iPhone on a family plan with unlimited data would be $9.99 plus $19.99 for the unlimited data. Since they require iPhones to have unlimited data plan, it's automatically $29.99. OMG! They're gouging a penny.

    3. Re:So essentially by lionforce5 · · Score: 1

      didn't think about that. I guess the appropriate question would be "why require an unlimted data plan" then, although the question ends up being more rhetorical.

  87. How much storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 6m18s into Apple's activation and sync video there's a view of the iTunes status page for an iPhone. The storage graph suggests the capacity of the device being viewed is about 80GB rather than just 8GB.

  88. Old plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they are announcing is the iphone will have exactly the same plan that that their video phones had for at least a year with regular voice plans and 19.99 for unlimited data 200 text or picture or video messages. The people who have pda's have to pay more for unlimited data, as they can fleece those customers a bit more. I am willing to bet that they actually are lazy and left it at 39.99 + 19.99= 59.98 for 450. 79.98 900 etc

  89. Cancellation fees are ludicrous... but normal. :( by argent · · Score: 1

    A few years back when I wanted to get T-Mobile service they wouldn't let me without a 2 year contract and $200 on the hook even if I didn't take a phone. Later I was able to get a pay-as-you-go service with the first month included for $60, so obviously their per-account costs are closer to the "50 cents worth of plastic" in the SIM card than the $200 they claimed was fair.

    So...

    1. I don't believe they've got $175 worth of costs on the hook.
    2. Fat chance getting them to change it until there's a competing x-, y-, or zPhone.

  90. Re: Treo 650, etc. by embsysdev · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google makes a version of Google Maps explicitly for the Treo as well as other smart phones.

    http://google.com/gmm/treo

  91. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by lithandie · · Score: 1

    I don't think that program is right. I keep getting compile errors with gcc.

  92. Re: Treo 650, etc. by Gompers · · Score: 1

    There is a google maps application for the treo that does almost exactly what the iPhone does. It works very well, especially if you have a 2.5 or 3G data connection (680, 700 or 755).

    The Treo's web experience, especially the 650, is rough largely because of the 1xRTT data network it rides on. The web browser is a bit sluggish as well, so it's not entirely the data connection, but it certainly doesn't help things. Keep in mind that the 1xRTT network is only marginally slower than the EDGE network that the iPhone will be largely tethered to, unless you're in a wifi hotspot area (in which case your notebook/laptop would be far more useful). If you don't believe me, try using the 650 as a dialup modem. It's almost unbearably slow to load a page in firefox.

    The camera in the 650 is horrible. The one in my 755 is better but still not great, however it's serviceable for taking pictures in a pinch when you don't have a real camera with you.

    I don't see the iPhone as being FAR more capable, I just see it as looking a whole lot better. In fact, I see it as being marginally less capable as most smartphones on the market, but far better integrated. That's what Apple does, and it's why the iPhone will probably be a success. It's not the mecca of smartphones yet, though. Give me VPN and the ability to provide native, non-networked apps and it'll be a lot closer. Also get it off that horrible network and give it 3G and then you might have something that I"d fork over some money for.

  93. Re:Cancellation fees are ludicrous... but normal. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    3. They're screwing people who don't buy a phone. i.e. possible extra 175 for them.
    4. They're using it to move phones. Which is what several of the bonuses along the chain is based on.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  94. see, you don't have to sacrifice your firstborn, by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    neither you must sign the agreement with your blood. I predict the unqualified success of iPhone!

  95. Re:For the Love of Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Also, I must deeply apologize for being interested in Apple. I know it's a rare ailment, and that it must offend you greatly. I'm almost shedding a tear!

    Don't worry, Dave. There is a remedy for that, you know.

  96. Yes, but by geekoid · · Score: 1

    The iPod is designed to be used without looking at it.
    difficult to do with this. Not that it matters, because yes, this would make a great PDA that plays music and Videos.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  97. Re:For the Love of Money by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    no they are not. The plans are way overpriced. 200 sms? oh come fricking on. put in there unlimited and quit raping the customers.

    Older cingular plans are far more reasonable and T-moble still kicks their butts.
    I wonder how long before unlocked iPhones start hitting the grey market so we can choose a more reasonable plan and provider.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  98. Re:Beware... cingular/AT&T has the worse servi by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

    The "new" AT&T is pure shit. This is fact, not opinion.

    SBC had their shit together. They were the largest and most organized of the "baby bells". I never had problems with their customer service. I never had problems with their technicians. I never had outages. And they billed things correctly and with full disclosure. Sure, they were still the soul-stealing Phone Company, but at least they did things correctly.

    Then they merged with "AT&T". Now, to tell the truth, the old AT&T was SBC. The other baby bells were essentially splintered off of AT&T and the remaining core was named Southwestern Bell (later SBC). But when the name brand came back with the merger with Pacific Bell, BellSouth, and a couple of others (one of them had acquired the "AT&T" name along the way), the whole thing went to shit. I used to consistently have a $52 phone/internet bill. Now, it's anywhere from $55 to $65, and it changes monthly. How difficult is it to charge the same monthly fee every month for local phone + no-surcharge long distance + DSL? Answer: apparently it's impossible for a company as incompetent as AT&T. They're morons. I wish they'd break back up and go back to being SBC. At least SBC had a functional billing system.

    I won't be buying an iPhone (as much as I want one) until I can get it to work on T-Mobile's network.

  99. $775 isn't so bad for the iBook nano by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    $600 + $175 for 0-day termination and just use WiFi + VoIP once the proper "patches" are out.

    The question really is, do you have to pay the first month $60 as well?

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  100. Teathering not allowed on SprintPCS either! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey, you may want to read your contract for unlimited data on SprintPCS --it expressly forbids laptop teathering; however, they seem to have a policy of not billing for the teathering if it is only occassional and if you connect in to #777 rather than to a third-party dial-up line. On the other hand, some people have reported receiving multi thousand dollar bills out of the clear blue sky (for the current billing period) after months or years of never having been billed for such usage and having to adjudicate the issue through SprintPCS' executive department. Check the Sprint Users Forums for more testimonials/info.

    1. Re:Teathering not allowed on SprintPCS either! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Hey, you may want to read your contract for unlimited data on SprintPCS --it expressly forbids laptop teathering; "

      Yeah...I've heard that. I don't use it often (although I have had to at times when home ISP was out for awhile), but, I don't run intensive P2P stuff, mostly hop on..do email, web surf a bit, and off again. It proved invaluable during the past few hurricane season when on 'the move'.

      That and my plan is from a LONG time ago...I don't think the plan I signed had anything making tethering verboten. It worked for years that way after I discovered it...and yes, it is the #777 thing. My mac made it easy to connect with the old phone and USB cable...and BT now in the more modern phone.

      They did try to turn it off on the new phone...but, I googled and found a hidden menu function to re-enable it via bluetooth.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  101. 1984 by catdriver · · Score: 1

    In true revisionist fashion, the video on Apple's website has now been fixed.

    1. Re:1984 by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Fixing a marketing flunky's error is revisionist?

    2. Re:1984 by catdriver · · Score: 1

      Naah, I just forgot my [tongue-in-cheek][/tongue-in-cheek] tags. ;) Actually, I think the Orwellian accusations thrown at both Apple and Microsoft can be pretty funny sometimes.

      I was impressed at how quickly and seamlessly they fixed the video, but if Apple's marketing team can't pull that off then I don't know who can.

      Cheers!

    3. Re:1984 by jaysones · · Score: 1

      Oh good! I thought to myself that this had really gotten out of control!

  102. Re:For the Love of Money by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To me, in 2007, phone service should be less than $20/mo, but being that people are willing to spend over $100/household for phones, the phone service people will gladly take their money.

    You're not really paying for the ability to talk on the phone or connect to the internet. You're paying for the ability to talk on the phone or connect to the internet more or less anywhere. Phone companies are unscrupulous bastards, yes, but that's not the only reason phone service costs what it does.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  103. Treo 650 by tm2b · · Score: 1

    Actually, I did the same thing.

    Two years later, and I'm only using it for network applications. Because it REALLY SUCKS as a phone. Shitty speaker, idiotic half duplex microphone, unreliable ringing (sometimes it rings on an incoming call, sometimes it doesn't)... it's only usable if I use a headset, and I hate headsets - and even then, it'll randomly crash when I travel distances.

    I can't wait to dump it for something that does network apps well and is actually a decent phone. I'm almost looking forward to iPhone more to dump the goddamned Treo 650 than to get all the new whizzbang stuff on the iPhone. (Almost. A phone that runs Unix...)

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  104. Re:Beware... cingular/AT&T has the worse servi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We started off with ATT Wireless back in the day, before Cingular came along. They were good. Customer service left something to be desired (I believe they outsourced to that magical land of callcenters on the other side of the world). But, I didn't drop calls, I had coverage where I went, blah blah blah, it wasn't bad. Then Cingular bought them, and offered a deal to all AT&T WS customers: Sign a 2 year contract with us, get new customer benefits (aka cheaper phones) and we'll waive your ATT ETF (and we were in a contract with ATT). We jumped on that. We wanted new phones. We wanted to add a line to a family plan.

    I left the house with an ATT phone with a full signal, and came back home with a Cingular phone with a crappy signal. But we survived. Then the bill came. The bill at that time was fine, but they spelled our last name wrong. We called to get that changed. Their customer service, while not outsourced, was terrible. Long hold times, incompetent techs, and it was never changed. We called again throughout the duration of the contract. Nope, never was changed. Then later on, there were billing mistakes. Crappy customer service to the rescue. Or not. My mom was on the phone with them for 2 hours to get it resolved, which she finally did after going up the chain. Oh, and did I fail to mention coverage still sucked and we still dropped calls? Eventually, the old AT&T tower which was 3 houses down (and the reason we got excellent coverage on AT&T) was converted to Cingular, so suddenly I had full signal on my phone. Yay, right? Nah. Still had dropped calls, still had static. Dunno WTF they did to that tower, probably gave it the Cingular curse, but it was still horrible.

    So, we lived with it because it just wasn't cost effective to pay the ETF on 3 lines. Eventually, my crappy Motorola broke and I replaced it with an unlocked Sony Ericsson w810i (and disproved any claim that the terrible coverage and quality was related to the phone). Then, coming up to our contract end, I called the script monkeys up to ask them when exactly our contract was up. She told me, then asked me why I wanted to know. I said we're going somewhere else. She said why. I said we have terrible coverage and drop calls all the time. She said, "I'm looking at the coverage map and yep, you don't have a strong signal near your house....oh wait, nevermind" OOPSIES!!! Probably weren't supposed to say that to the customer! (we did have a strong signal, just not one that was worth a damn).

    So, one day last December, we were finally free from our contract. First thing we did as a family that morning was drop by the T-Mobile store. Fortunately, the typo on our last name (still not fixed after 2 years) didn't affect the porting process. Soon after, we left there with 4 phones (ported 3 and added one more line) and since have had excellent coverage and their customer support is just awesome. It's not outsourced, they're friendly and competent, and I've never waited on hold for more than 20 seconds. Did I mention how great their coverage is here?

    Our bill with T-Mobile is CHEAPER (by about 20 bucks I believe, then again, I don't remember ever seeing a correct Cingular bill laying around the house that I could compare to) than it was with Cingular. And with T-Mobile, we have one more line than we did with Cingular and one of the lines has the BlackBerry plan (we had no extras on Cingular). One more line and unlimited data, and we're still paying less.

    Since switching to T-Mobile, I've only dropped a call once. Oh yeah, that one time, I was out in the middle of nowhere Missouri and roaming on Cingular!

  105. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by nolife · · Score: 1

    All jokes aside, I avoided an iPod for this exact reason. I guess in theory I could have just got an iPod and used iTunes and been happy but I am amazed at the tie in that some people are inclined to go through with. Imagine having an iPod, using your iPod specific sound system on your desk, your iPod specific doc station built into your car by the manufacturer, using an iPhone to listen to those iTunes with a ATT contract. That is way to deep for me and I have not even touched on the video side. I'm sure the integration is great but you are severely limited to choices that are offered by Apple to put all of your eggs in one basket like that. Well, you have the docking station built into the dash of your car and the 2 year contract on the iPhone, you might as well keep buying tunes from iTMS and buy another iPod if your fails. Again, you do not have to take it to that level but it seems odd that so many people are willing to do that. The idea that a simple thing such as a car maker offering only Sirius or XM is limiting my choices! To each is own I guess and my statements are neither for nor against any specific company or an attempt to change someones mind and i am familiar with the concept that other computer companies are kind of doing the same thing which does not make the situation any better or justify it.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  106. Wrong by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    As far as I can tell you cannot get unlimited data for 19.99. You can get unlimited *messaging* for that price, but I'm not seeing it.

    1. Re:Wrong by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Jeez, you think I made up the prices and everything rather than copying them from the web site?

      http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service//ce ll-phone-plans/smartphone-connect-plans.jsp

      It's called SmartPhone Connect Unlimited with Xpress Mail. Unlimited data, $19.99 a month.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  107. Screw AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who buys a cell phone from AT&T deserves whatever they get. I'll never do business with them again! They intentionally screwed me by telling me their service worked where they *knew* that it didn't. They're a bunch of crooks and even a shiny new iPhone wouldn't change my mind.

    I'd think twice before signing up for any AT&T service!

  108. Mobile to Mobile? by nugx · · Score: 1

    What exactly do they mean by 'Unlimited Mobile to Mobile'? Unlimited calls to other ATT Wireless users? Or any wireless user, even on different networks, eg: Sprint?

  109. US mobile contracts by CoolCat · · Score: 1

    Here in Norway, it is not normal to have binding contract for no more than 12 months, and the monthly fees are much lower than the 60 bucks many people here are willing to pay. We do not for except prepaid cards not have free minutes. Most carriers have low minute prices and SMS is like 0,30 NOK each.

    Trying to collect bits and pieces of information and it seems like US mobile phone contract system is like 10-15 years behind Europe. Please enlighten.

    (Anyway, many get prepaid subscription (with virtually unlimited usage) and a phone from the employer too.)

  110. WiFi and 3G by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're afraid of VOIP on future 3G iPhones, but not on this one. Have you ever tried a VOIP app on GPRS? The latency is so bad it's unusable. It's not even usable on my Sprint EVDO phone tethered to a laptop, but much moreso than a GPRS data connection.

    You've got some good points there. VoIP on EDGE would be unusable, but there are two reasons this could still be a concern.
    1) As you note, future 3G iPhones: Open up the SDK now and have to deal with it in the future.
    2) WiFi connections: Isn't the current iPhone able to use local WiFi connections?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  111. Re:Cancellation fees are ludicrous... but normal. by argent · · Score: 1

    3 and 4 don't apply for the iPhone. :)

  112. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by DECS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can avoid the iPod because it is a free market. You can buy a Zen or even a Zune.

    You can't do the same in the PC market. You will grow grey hairs before Dell or HP or any other PC maker will offer you real options in your OS. Sure, a few token free OS offerings to hobbyists, but no commercial competition, and no hope for that situation to change. It's been the same since the early 90s. That's a monopoly.

    Avoiding Windows is like trying to avoid roads or money. Sure you can barter and live in a cave, but there is really no option to avoiding Windows. You can easily avoid any products from Apple and find all sorts of competitive alternatives.

    Apple: iPhone Now Costs Less than Ballmer's Lame Motorola Q
    After earlier blowing apart iPhone battery panic with an announcement of 8 hours of talk time, Apple dropped yet another bombshell upon "business as usual" in the mobile market. ...With the new plans announced by Apple and AT&T, that has changed. The minimum plan with unlimited data is $59, or $1416 over two years. That makes the $500 iPhone well over a hundred dollars less than Verizon's limp Motorola Q, which is $2170 with its required service plan.

  113. Man thats good... by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    That is cheeper than I am currently paying (South Africa). If their international roaming charges are PG13 then I might get one and roam. Locked in for 2 years might be a bit harsh if it breaks which is what usually happens to my phones.

  114. Which phone then by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Which phone has the same plans and is also free?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  115. 80GB capacity explanation by Steffan · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty certain that what you see in that video is actually a Keynote presentation of the activation process using screenshots / mocked up screens. Probably someone slipped up on their decimal points.

  116. No Need by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    After seeing the EnGadget plan comparisons, I agree now that other phones can have very similar plans... unless you are looking at the family plans, where the iPhone is cheaper (but only by $10 or so).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  117. Exchange Support Rumor by MidKnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Somewhat off-topic, but there's another interesting iPhone rumor/tidbit floating in the ether today: A ZDNet Blog claims that Apple will be announcing sometime this week that they've licensed the MS Exchange ActiveSync API... which would signal that the iPhone is almost definitely compatible with Exchange Servers. For folks whose IT departments are in love with that particular software stack, I'll bet that will be big news.

    1. Re:Exchange Support Rumor by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      Jokes about Exchange aside (which I know people will make), this would be big. Of the 6-12 Exchange migrations I do a year Exchange ActiveSync is always a big selling point. Why buy Goodlink/Blackberry software (please donut bring up BlackBerry redirector) and another server when EAS is built in? If Apple does this I will be more than happy to bring them phone customers, which will be easy once they try out my phone. If I can sell them Exchange after they try out a "average" Audiovox XV6700 I'm fairly sure I can sign them up after playing with an iPhone.

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  118. EDGE doesn't have low enough latency by weston · · Score: 1

    My experience with EDGE suggests that while the bandwidth might be just barely there, by and large the latency isn't going to be low enough, maybe even in the best of areas.

    On the other hand, if someone develops a VOIP client for the iPhone (and I think it's likely someone will, one way or another), then that'd be quite usable when in WiFi range...

  119. DUN??? by photomonkey · · Score: 1

    Anyone happen to know if the phone and plan will allow for 'tethered' dial-up-networking?

    --
    Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
  120. Re:For the Love of Money by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    I dunno what the big deal is. In the US, you buy a phone and you're signing a 1 or 2 year contract, that is the norm here. Not quite. The norm in the US is that when you sign a 2 year contract at the time you buy your phone, you get a big discount on the phone. I paid $50 for my phone, but if I'd bought it without a contract, it would've been a few hundred. To have to sign a contract and still pay $500 for the iPhone is nothing but extortion.
    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  121. Damn by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    59.99 a month? For that much I could use 411 (a friendly service at least down here), stick to my old cellphone and buy well equipted MP3 player after a couple months...

    No thank you.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  122. No, they don't. by pavon · · Score: 1

    YouTube does not work with Safari on the iPhone, nor does any flash application on any other site (like myspace music player). Instead Apple worked with Google to create a custom application that gets videos from the YouTube servers in a custom format via a custom API. I don't know how well google maps works on the iPhone version of Safari, but apparently it was poor enough that they decided to write a custom application for that as well.

  123. No MMS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it true you can't send picture messages?

  124. Let me get this straight... by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    You're buying a phone that is NOT subsidized by the contract, and you're paying higher monthly fees on the contract than a comparable contract w/out iPhone service? I think ATT is creaming their pants right now.

  125. Overage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm-- I hate to point out the glaringly-obvious, but all these numbers are useless if we don't know what airtime in excess of the plans' allocations costs.

    How much for overage?

  126. Re:For the Love of Money by martinX · · Score: 1

    >>who prides himself on the BMWs he's owned

    What? Four? Ranging in age from '88 to '06. Hardly indulgent of him...

    >>and lists his top 'interest' as Apple?

    We are ALL interested in Apple. That's why we click on the stories under the heading "Apple".

    You so silly! You make me laugh.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  127. Re: Treo 650, etc. by toxicity69 · · Score: 1

    In my experience its less to do with the actual capabilities of the phone, and more of the lack of capabilities of the phone network. If you try to bring up a webpage on any smart phone, the latency is on the order of seconds, even if the bandwidth is massive. Thats what really kills it for me; I like to check my Yahoo mail on my phone, and I have the old-style interface going that uses very little bandwidth. Even on a dial up connection, it loads sharpishly. However, on a phone, it takes several seconds just to get the request for the page, several seconds to send the page to my phone, and after I've entered my login info, several seconds to send that info to the network, then several seconds to finally load up my inbox. Granted, cell phone networks aren't broadband, but I'm just too damn used to the speed of my typing (which is actually rather fast) being the absolute limiting factor in how fast I can access my email.

  128. Are you sure? by damacus · · Score: 1

    I have the 450/5000 voice-only plan for my SE T616, with pay-per-use net, which costs $10.24 per MiB. I called them once maybe a year ago and asked about my options for data. Their answer was something like $10 for 5M, $30 for 20, or $45 for unlimited.

    So, the new plans are definitely a bit better. It's still not as inexpensive as Sprint or T-Mobile, but at least it's competitive. It also includes free mobile to mobile which my current phone doesn't. So, $20 more for unlimited data and free in-network? It's a deal.

    The only question I have left is whether or not the iPhone will work in a tethered mode..

  129. iPhone - just for the internet, forget cell phone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iPhone is great for an iPod and great as a little WiFi hand held browser,
    forget the AT&T plan - I already have a cell phone and do not want them.

    I hope Apple updates the REAL iPod with some new features developed in the iPhone...

  130. Re:For the Love of Money by tepples · · Score: 1

    The norm in the US is that when you sign a 2 year contract at the time you buy your phone, you get a big discount on the phone. So where in the United States can I buy a GSM phone up front, pay for the service month to month, and be free to switch carriers at any time? Aren't the "prepaid" phones still carrier-locked?
  131. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by nolife · · Score: 1

    I think you missed my point and missed my last statement that said "i am familiar with the concept that other computer companies are kind of doing the same thing which does not make the situation any better or justify it." I don't need the "MS is the evil as well" speech either because my post was just as anti MS as it was anti Apple. My goal is not to avoid Apple or MS, it is to avoid being trapped by an increasing number of things that require each other to be useful. I just bought a portable GPS unit, it runs Windows CE, I don't give a crap what it runs, I do not need a Windows home PC or a Windows cell phone to use it, it is a stand alone product that works regardless of me having a Linux or an Apple computer. If that same GPS unit required me to have a Windows Home PC, a subscription to MSN, a Windows antenna and a Windows CE phone for it to work, I would not have bought it.
    My point was putting all of your eggs in one basket and dedicating you future purchases towards one product like some people are with the iPod accessories and services seems too much like a trap to me. I could buy an iPod and buy nothing else to go with it and not be trapped in anything and I would be fine with that. I could have a Q (which I did in the past and got rid of it). With that Q, am I also buying from the Motorola music website, the Motorola compatible dock in the dashboard of my car, a Motorola streaming solution, a Motorola compatible desktop docking station, using a Motorola website to also buy videos, using a Motorola device to hear music along with a portable Motorola music player as well? Imagine a few years down the road and I do not Motorola's offerings? I have a shit load of stuff that is now completely useless to me. Substitute the word Motorola for MS or Apple and the same applies. The OS that may run a lot of those devices may be MS, it may not be MS. I am not saying that being an all in one solution is not a good choice for some but it is NOT a choice I will make regardless of Apple, MS, or Motorola.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  132. People who realize... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    ...that it does not support HSDPA--when phones costing a quarter as much under similar terms do--will refuse the purchase. ... and those who realize their HSDPA performance is around 10% of spec, lingering around the EDGE spec, and similarly that their EDGE devices are lumbering along at about 10% of spec, might just give up completely.

    When you snoop around the forums for the OPTION cards that support HSDPA, which should support 3Mbps+, people are THRILLED to get 300Kbps, which is fine for "bursty" traffic, but when you've got a 100MB download to chew through and your device is fully capable of pulling it down in 4, not 45, minutes...that difference gets a bit nerving, especially at $50/month. No, I don't expect it 24/7, but damn...

  133. for those who only want the iPod functionality by gig · · Score: 1

    If you only want it as an iPod, wait three months. At that point, iPod video is 2 years old and it will have been 9 months since Steve Jobs said the iPhone is "the best iPod we've ever made." Obviously, the wide screen, multi-touch, and Cover Flow are all coming to iPod video, I bet the Wi-Fi and Web browser come along also. With big disks in them they will be fatter than iPhone but not huge.

    Part of the reason the iPhone has had so much hype is that they put the first next-generation iPod into it ... the iPod features are sizzle right now for the iPhone but not going to be exclusive to it for long.

  134. Re:For the Love of Money by Divebus · · Score: 1

    My first cell phones (1989) cost $15.00 a month through C&P Telephone (pronounced Verizon now). It worked great because I only used them on nights and weekends. Otherwise, it was $0.68 a minute. Verizon fixed all that for me by jacking up everything they possibly could so those dreaded high phone bills of the past are automatic now.

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
  135. re: directions by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I *know* I really wanted a feature like this MANY times when traveling. If I'm out of town on a business trip, I very likely have limited access to the Internet for starters. The connection on my phone may very well be all I've got easy access to at all.

    When you finish work and your co-worker says "Hey, let's find some dinner!" - what do you do? Probably start driving around and stop at the first thing you run into that's acceptable, right? Or possibly, ask the front desk person at your hotel for recommendations and directions, which are just as often useless as accurate.

    But imagine instead, you just pull out your phone and do a search for all restaurants of a given type within 5 miles of your hotel's address? Now you've got current, accurate info and even a phone number to dial if you want to make reservations or something.

  136. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Sure, I always consider vendor "convictions" (although in fact it was a civil action against MS) when selecting a product no matter how well or poorly it fits my needs or whether it locks me in.

  137. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    So I guess Linux is just a mythical OS since there's not a free market in personal computers and you have to use Windows.

  138. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by DECS · · Score: 1

    Linux is free to obtain.

    If the only thing that can compete against Windows is free, and while even being free is making little impact on the desktop, then it's a sign that the market may not be open to competition.

    It is also difficult to get Linux on name brand PCs. If you have to buy Windows, remove it and install Linux (or BSD or whatever), then it's hardly a competitor, because you've bought Windows. Remember than Microsoft doesn't care if a handful of people use Linux, as long as they also buy the Windows license.

  139. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by amper · · Score: 1

    Imagine a few years down the road and I do not Motorola's offerings? I have a shit load of stuff that is now completely useless to me. Substitute the word Motorola for MS or Apple and the same applies.

    You may want to re-read what you wrote here...a few years down the road the vast majority of the electronic devices currently in circulation will be landfill, because they will be completely useless to the vast majority of the populace. What was your argument again?

  140. Only if you limit yourself to a 3125... by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    Did you actually try to put together a new phone plan package with that SmartPhone Connect etc? You can only use it with a Cingular 3125 flip phone. Any of the real PDA phones (iPhone equivalents) like the treos etc. require a $39.99 data plan for unlimited access.

    1. Re:Only if you limit yourself to a 3125... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The Treo isn't an iPhone equivalent, as it can run arbitrary software. The iPhone is just like a 3125 with a fancy UI.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  141. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    The issue was being locked in. With the payment made to brand name PC companies, you're probably not really paying for Windows anyway. And what about Apple computers? They are personal computers that don't require Windows.

  142. Re:For the Love of Money by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    Amazing new fact discovered about economics: Prices are determined, not only by cost, but also by what customers are willing to pay!

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  143. Re:Slashdot is against the wrong monopoly by nolife · · Score: 1

    If you have 20 devices and services that attach, connect to, or interface with a widget by CompanyX, you are more then likely going to be buying another widget made by CompanyX when yours breaks and the cycle will continue. If you decide that something else might be a good choice and do not buy another widget made by CompanyX, the other 19 things that you invested in, that are integrated into your vehicle, that you have extended contracts on etc.. are now useless or reduced in capability. The 20 things you have all work together and are part of a team of devices for integration. Those 20 things are not as useful without the other 19. A widget docking station you paid for in your car is of no value any longer if you do not have a widget to connect to it. The docking station on your desk is not a useful any longer without an widget to connect to it. I am not trying to pick on any widget made by any compnay, only the concept of getting yourself stuck into a circle of products. What does stuff ending up in a landfill have to do with this concept anyway? I would say that would make the problem I point out worse because you keep buying stuff for to maintain the same integration over and over again.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  144. Re:For the Love of Money by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "So where in the United States can I buy a GSM phone up front, pay for the service month to month, and be free to switch carriers at any time? Aren't the "prepaid" phones still carrier-locked?"

    While I suppose that is possible, I've never heard of anyone doing that here in the US. I was actually surprised that people did it in Europe...figured it was the same way everywhere as here....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  145. you got me apple was gunning for the 3125 by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

    Except I do remember seeing pictures of the treo in the keynote and other phones of that caliber. I can't imagine they are expecting less data use on the iphones the way they are marketing it - hence my surprise.

  146. AT&T and Service Plans + Deposits by bartmank11 · · Score: 1

    ***** READ THIS IT MIGHT SAVE YOU MONEY AND EMBARRESTMENT********

    IF YOU ARE GETTING AN IPHONE RUN YOUR CREDIT NOW!!!!

    I am a Sprint/Nextel and AT&T Represenative (Work for Radioshack) and I find what AT&T and does like every cell phone carrier is PUSH the extra's.

    Go to your local Rad-shack or At&T store and grab a Rate plan

    AT&T ALWAYS F*^cks up their plans they show the price with the Media Max packages and it confuses people!!!

    Now on top of everything if you think your'e walking out of the store with a Iphone for the price advertised your CRAZY

    The one reason I Hate Cingular/The New At&T and why 90% of my business is Sprint/Nextel is

    THE DEPOSITS!!!!

    On an average I get 400 dollar deposits with them where I get 2-3 lines approved with Sprint

    (Don't get me wrong I think At&T/Cingular is a way better service but they advertise wrong and there deposits are way too high!!)

    SO AGAIN IF YOU ARE GETTING AN IPHONE RUN YOUR CREDIT NOW!!!!

    This will now change when open the account!! In fact it may go up when the Iphone comes out!!

  147. Re:For the Love of Money by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    Buy the phone from eBay or from any store - I believe carriers will unlock phones for you if they come locked and you pay full price, and independent stores are likely to have unlocked phones on hand. I don't know about month to month postpaid accounts, but I know you can buy prepaid SIMs. Here is a site that sells them (at seemingly ridiculous prices), but you can probably get them from a Cingular or T-Mobile store too.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  148. Grrr by caol.kailash · · Score: 1

    This is kinda annoying: The minimum plan for the iPhone is cheaper than my plan with Sprint, with unlimited internet and 500 minutes (and two phones, even with just one phone it'd be cheaper.) Except 200 texts is crap, but AT&T has an unlimited text for 5 bucks I think, so even then it's cheaper. So really, it seems the main costs at issue are the 1 time phone purchase, and any sort of contract or security deposits