Slashdot Mirror


Circuit City Phases Out VHS

Rashan writes: "Video Business Online is reporting that Circuit City is becoming the first of the mass merchants to state its intent to discontinue sales of the aging video format."

478 comments

  1. Wow, like this hasn't happened before... by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Ever tried to by a tape of your favorite new album?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Wow, like this hasn't happened before... by Launch · · Score: 1

      Usally the albums I buy aren't in video format.

      --
      Your mammas flamebait.
    2. Re:Wow, like this hasn't happened before... by i64X · · Score: 0

      You know what point he was trying to make - if you don't, you don't belong out in public. They phased out cassette tapes in favor of CDs just like they're doing to VHS now in favor of DVDs - that's the point he was trying to make: "We've seen it before."

    3. Re:Wow, like this hasn't happened before... by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Ever tried to by a tape of your favorite new album?

      Tower Records still orders and stocks cassette tapes from the manufacturers, who still manufacture and sell them. Want to buy Puff Daddy on cassette? No problem.

      (Actually, interestingly enough, my experience was that 60% of the tapes we sold were rap, compared to maybe 10% of CDs).

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    4. Re:Wow, like this hasn't happened before... by Launch · · Score: 1

      yah, you are right... I must admit I did a post before I really read. I noticed it like two seconds after I posted... I wish there was a way to retract comments.

      --
      Your mammas flamebait.
  2. I would think that this is about time by Tim_F · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just as we have seen record stores phasing out tapes over the last few years, we know start to see the same with VHS. And it's about time. VHS tapes degrage horribly over time.

    1. Re:I would think that this is about time by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, but are you going to trust the forecasting ability of the company that saw the future of video was DIVX?

      Anyway, since VHS is still the primary *recording* medium of the consumer, I wonder if they'll continue to sell VCRs?

      I just mentally picture Circuit City as being more "in the pocket" of Sony et al, especially when it comes to playing with the anti-copying lobbyists.

      --
      John
    2. Re:I would think that this is about time by bokketies · · Score: 1

      Here in India, dvd replecid the VHS long time ago. No store actally sell the VHS anymore. Only some old stores. Everything is dvd now here.

      I tought the USA alwais first? :-)

      Radjif.

    3. Re:I would think that this is about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Somehow I find that hard to believe. I know our friends in the East like to own new gadgets, but especially India has a huge heritance of movies. Surely those haven't been converted or disposed of already?!?

    4. Re:I would think that this is about time by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

      Yes, but how do you record TV shows? Are PVR's being sold in large numbers there, or have people moved to other tape formats, such as Hi-8 and DVC?

      Granted, VHS sucks as a recording medium, but it's just about all we have that's cheap and readily available. I like the idea of PVRs, but I don't want to pay a monthly subscription fee for the privilege of being able to use one, and after the crap that TiVo recently pulled in the UK, I definitely have an aversion to them.

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    5. Re:I would think that this is about time by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Degrade? My copy of Debbie Does Dallas plays just as well as it did back in the early 90's as it does today!

      Of which, anyone know where I can locate this great release on DVD? :grin:

      --
      ======
      Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
    6. Re:I would think that this is about time by die_rollerblader · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are going to stop selling VCRs anytime soon. I'll bet they will still sell blank VHS tapes for some time too. I think they are just going to stop selling movies on VHS. Which is fine by me.

    7. Re:I would think that this is about time by Marco_polo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know!

      I have tapes where uhhh.. certain.. uhh "scenes" are all distorted from repeated rewind-play-rewind-play

      -T

      --
      I am the lord of the pun. Dance Knave!
    8. Re:I would think that this is about time by bokketies · · Score: 1

      Yes in India many movies are made. But they are quikly repleced. Movie older then 1 year no longer intresting, so nobody watches. Now every movie only on the dvd. Old VHS get dumped.

      We have pile of movies nobody watches :-)

      why you got score -1? I thought queston was good. I am still the slashdot new, but do not understend.

      greetings,

      Radjif.

    9. Re:I would think that this is about time by pigeon · · Score: 1

      Forget DDD. Where do I get Deep Throat on DVD?

    10. Re:I would think that this is about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get get plenty of these...type of DVDs here.

      Ahem. At least that's what I heard.

      Oh shit, I forgot to click 'Post Anonymously!'

    11. Re:I would think that this is about time by slaker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Try WantedList for NetFlix-like porno-rental of over 10,000 titles.

      I'm not affliated in any way, other than as a happy customer.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    12. Re:I would think that this is about time by embarcadero · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. There's a huge, massive, practically engorged difference between the VHS and audio cassette markets.

      Audiophiles could limp toward CD purchasing without too much concern, but the true VHS addicts are turgid in their desire to replay and replay particular favorite scenes from old collections, even if they originally shot in the 80s.

      Now, I realize that their VHS performance does degrade over time, it's pretty clear these hard-core fans will happily squeeze out 50 or 60 bucks for new versions of the same old tapes.

      Clearly, these fans are also being teased by more modern devices, like DVDs and the Internet, but they're not going to wipe up and flush their VHS collections.
      And if their VCR breaks, there's no question they're going to buy a brand-spanking new one. They've just got too much stock on hand to ignore.

    13. Re:I would think that this is about time by JonWan · · Score: 1

      India indeed makes a lot of movies! About 10 times as many as Hollywood. I am amazed you could find a VHS tape in India, I always thought most asian countrys used VCDs instead. I've watched a few, but it seems that they are all musicals. ;-)

      BTW the last local Catholic priest was from India, go figure! Welcome to slashdot.

    14. Re:I would think that this is about time by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

      Amen to that! Now, maybe Lucas will finally decide that DVD has officially arrived and release the bulk of his movies on it.

      I wonder...does the man even own a DVD player? Aside from all the issues with CSS, Macrovision, and region coding, it's a damn good video format. Why he is so damn stubborn about not releasing his back catalog on it is beyond me.

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    15. Re:I would think that this is about time by JonWan · · Score: 1

      Heh, this got rated funny but it's true. I have tapes in my rental store that have the naughty bits worn out. Take your pick Shannon Tweed, Sharon Stone, any actress that takes her close off. Hey to be fair it's not just guys doing this, any movie where Mel Gibson drops his pants gets the same treatment from women.

    16. Re:I would think that this is about time by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but are you going to trust the forecasting ability of the company that saw the future of video was DIVX?

      The future of video *is* DIVX. I pirate 95% of my DVDs in that format :)

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    17. Re:I would think that this is about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Degrade? My copy of Debbie Does Dallas plays just as well as it did back in the early 90's as it does today!
      Of which, anyone know where I can locate this great release on DVD? :grin:


      I would suggest you try one of the alt.binaires.multimedia.erotica groups. Somebody must have posted a DivX of that at some point.

    18. Re:I would think that this is about time by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      practically engorged difference
      turgid in their desire
      teased by more modern devices
      wipe up and flush

      Dude! Your subconscious is
      screaming at you to go out and get laid! Listen to it!

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    19. Re:I would think that this is about time by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "VHS tapes degrage horribly over time. "

      There are two things I like about VHS:

      1.) They can't play games with new encryption technologies or whatever to prevent me from capturing it. *Glares at the RIAA and their computer crashing CD's*

      2.) Since DVD's are decidedly superior, VHS versions are usually cheaper. There are some movies that are worth $10, but not worth $20, even if the quality is higher. For example: Castaway. This is a movie you watch maybe once or twice, and the extra resolution isn't going to change your appreciation of the movie. It's not like AI where the visuals are incredible and you ache for every pixel you can lay your eyes on.

      So yah, they degrade, but they're a nice alternative to paying $20 - $25 for a movie you only kind of want.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:I would think that this is about time by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      I was in India at the start of the year and DVDs were not at all common. Even at the international airport there were just half a dozen Bollywood flicks on a wooden desk - I stocked up on cheap DVDs at the stopover in Dubai. The newspapers do feature lots of adverts for VCD players but that is not the same thing!

      Over here in the UK you can get Bollywood DVDs if that's your thing but they tend to be very lazy dumps of the video - no special features just the film and maybe a TV trailer if your lucky.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    21. Re:I would think that this is about time by slipgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why he is so damn stubborn about not releasing his back catalog on it is beyond me.

      Especially when he gets so excited about digital cinema...

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    22. Re:I would think that this is about time by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Jesus, for the Internet!

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    23. Re:I would think that this is about time by The_Laughing_God · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how do you record TV shows? Are PVR's being sold in large numbers there, or have people moved to other tape formats, such as Hi-8 and DVC?

      Just, FYI, here's a report form the trenches:

      About six months ago, I bought an IOmagic PVR card ($39 from Outpost before a $20 rebate!) for my technically incompetent father who care barely check his e-mail, much less send an attachment) It installed cleanly and automagically when the CD was inserted (in Win95, later 98, on a old Celeron 466)

      Admittedly, the bundled drivers and programs stank, but a quick web search would reveled that it was a rebadged Pinnacle Studio Pro, whose downloadable drivers and apps are much better - the controls are almost as easy as a VCR (not that he can program a VCR) The whole job is on a par with installing a modem and internet connection in Win95 - which many home users managed (despite learned helplessness if they had techie friends available)

      The card was also auto detected and usable by most of the video capture, editing and other software I have acquired over the years (a few did require me to manually select the card from a list)

      The video was quite good using the bundleded app, and the could be recordings played with any Open Source deinterlacing program (either to TV or computer monitor) at 480 lines progressive - better than VHS can achieve (VHS can't resolve better than 400 lines, and most VCRs resolve fewer than that)

      Overall, a PVR card is cheaper, and provides better video than a VHS VCR (if not the 24/7 reliability, due to the OS), and is hardly a technical problem. Yet, even technophiles simply haven't bothered.

      Sure, most people might not know this. Then again. most people don't know how to steal cable, yet in many neighborhoods, cable theft was the rule -- and the PC-PVR solution is perfectly legal.

      I use a MyHD HDTV video card (Digital Connections), on a $200 Athlon 1700+XP Soyo barebones (Outpost). with $70 512MB DDRAM and a $70 80 GB HDD as a HDTV capable tuner/recorder/video server, and it all pretty much worked straight out of the box. Total cost was about the same as a HDTV tuner alone (if you buy a HDTV, you usually have to buy a separate HDTV tuner - $500-900 at Best Buy)

      Okay, the average joe won't invest even the 2 hours it took to assemble and install, but it's a great afternoon project for any geek who is interested in video recording or sharing as more than an intellectual rant. Take the plunge.

      You can use an existing computer. The Athlon is overkill for viewing or recording (I bought it for CPU intensive video editing/processing) I can do real work on the system as I view/record HDTV.

  3. Ahhhh by Pyrosz · · Score: 4, Funny

    But I can still buy Beta, right?

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    1. Re:Ahhhh by checkyoulater · · Score: 0, Troll

      But I can still buy Beta, right?

      I doubt Circuit City ever sold any flavour of Beta. In fact, I doubt that a Circuit City employee even knows what Beta, Betamax or Betacam are. Of course, beta machines are hardly for the home user these days.

      And yes, I do realise you were trying to be funny.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    2. Re:Ahhhh by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 1

      No, linux is free :P

    3. Re:Ahhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, you are correct! Beta - well, it's successors - Betacam SP and Digibeta will ironically outlast VHS as they are part of the broadcast industry.

      And you thought you were being funny...

    4. Re:Ahhhh by scott1853 · · Score: 1

      You're joking, but I have an uncle that's got plenty of money, but he's still using the same betamax player he bought a couple decades ago for watching home movies he's made on his beta camcorder.

    5. Re:Ahhhh by L600R · · Score: 1

      You can still buy blank beta tapes @ Radio Shack.

    6. Re:Ahhhh by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, yes you can:
      Right from the horse's mouth
      OR
      From the store with the puzzled staff

      I myself have three Betamax VCRs, two BetaCams and just over 30 tapes. The quality of the image is quite astounding, plus it's fun to wander around and take video with my Super BetaCam. All this old junk still cost less than buying one overpriced digital video camera.

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
  4. So? by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 0

    Does this mean they might stop selling cassette players too?

    What about floppy drives?

    It always pisses me off when I can't find a good betamax player...

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      floppy drives will never go away, the one time every 3 years you need it, you *really need* it.

      It'll be like 2040 before they go to the wayside.

    2. Re:So? by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 1

      they would go away if it wasn't for clo0less no0bs who can't figure out what a bootblock is or how to use nero.

      I haven't had to use a floppy for anything but a bios flash in years (and that's only because of the laziness of BIOS programmers).

      Death to the floppy and all that it stands for!!!

    3. Re:So? by owlicks58 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I'm a mac guy, so we haven't had a floppy drive in our computers in 4 years, beginning with the original iMac. There hasn't been a single time that I've missed having a floppy

      --
      -Alex
    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see you install an OS on a box without El Torito, or an OS that doesn't have an El Torito-enabled disk....

      Or let's say you wish to download your favorate free OS and want to install it without burning a CD...

      What do you need? The grand ol' Boot Floppy!

      Plus there's the insanely cool factor of using tar directly on a floppy disk. Up to 1.44mb compressed tarballs, and the Windows and Mac folks will think it's unformatted!

    5. Re:So? by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 1

      I had a Performa 6400 with a floppy drive within the last 3 years, but it only collected dust. About all it got used for was reinstalling old games that shipped on floppies, like F/A-18 Hornet 2.0 or Wolfenstein 3D(the latter had a problem on one of the diskettes, so I couldn't reinstall it).

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    6. Re:So? by X-Dopple · · Score: 1

      So, what's your solution to updating a BIOS from a protected-mode OS like W2K or WinXP?

    7. Re:So? by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      and the Windows and Mac folks will think it's unformatted!

      And this is a plus? THis just means my wife will put it in the machine, thinks its not formatted and format the damned thing. I am a computer geek and as such, one machine or another in my house always seems to be out of commission as I do something to it. She still uses floppies to store things like our household budget because at least she knows that that won't go away..

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  5. Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their sales people work on commission (at least they seem to) and are always pestering me when I shop there. Generally, I'm quite informed about what I'm looking for, and don't really want them buzzing around me trying to point me at things I'm not interested in.

    About 5 years ago, I was looking for a new cordless phone to take back to college with me. 900mhz was the thing to buy (spread spectrum baby!), and the salesman was like "Wow, that's a powerful phone, you don't need that." and I was like "Yes, yes I do. I live in a dorm with many people with many cordless phones and I need one with more than a handful of non-encrypted channels." and then we had a big fight. So anyway, I didn't buy the phone there. I went to Best Buy, and this "too powerful" phone is the one I still use, and it still kicks ass (now in an apartment building.)

    1. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      sounds like my expierance but just the opisit, i wanted to buy a home theater a few years back, and i couldnt get anyone to help me. It was kind of strange since they work on commision, all that i can think of is that i didnt look like a big enough commision for them to bother with, i was just out of high school at the time. Anyhow i finally gave up after about 45 min, i took my money to best buy, and ive never been back to circuit city again.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    2. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Jebus_the_spork · · Score: 0

      yeah, best buy employees dont work on comission.

      plus their cd and dvd collection is something to be desired (like i buy cd's, lmao)

      --
      I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows - Bart Simpson
    3. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by old7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not only do they earn commission, they earn their commission based on the profit of an item. That "too powerful" phone you were trying to purchase was probably a loss leader and had a very poor profit margin. He was likely trying to steer you a phone with a better profit margin and of course a better commission for him. Commission is still commission, but don't be fooled into thinking that the more expensive item will yield a better commission for the salesperson.

    4. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually that was the old commission structure CC employees used to be on. Last september they went to a straight commission model based on %

    5. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
      "About 5 years ago, I was looking for a new cordless phone to take back to college with me. 900mhz was the thing to buy (spread spectrum baby!), and the salesman was like "Wow, that's a powerful phone, you don't need that." and I was like "Yes, yes I do. I live in a dorm with many people with many cordless phones and I need one with more than a handful of non-encrypted channels." and then we had a big fight. So anyway, I didn't buy the phone there. I went to Best Buy, and this "too powerful" phone is the one I still use, and it still kicks ass (now in an apartment building.)"

      That sounds quite similar to what happened to me at Radio Shack last year when shopping for a cell phone. The guy tried to steer me away from certain phones because the service plans for them were 'too expensive.' (These were the pay as you go plans where, although the per minute rate is high, they are still cheapest for low-useage folks like me. I have one such phone right now and I pay CDN$10/month for useage.)

    6. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I was there shopping for a video card about a month ago. They didnt give me a lot of crap whilst picking it out, but after i did, I was walking around the rest of the store with it, looking at some stuff, and this employee kept pestering me: "Are you ready for me to take your money now?"

      Needless to say, he didnt get the commmission.

    7. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by colmore · · Score: 2

      best buy's CD collection is great if you only shop for RIAA artists. try to find someone from an indie label, though.

      if i didn't live in a town with well stocked locally owned record stores (that actually sell records) i don't know what i'd do.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    8. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Hell, in the UK, the biggest retailers get a commission on the service plans. You buy a TV, and then they want to charge you an extra 25-100% for an extra two year's parts and labour service.

      I tend to go to smaller indpenedent retailers.

    9. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Funny

      He was likely trying to steer you a phone with a better profit margin and of course a better commission for him.

      Heh.

      "Would you like an extended warranty with that?"

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    10. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by mrcparker · · Score: 1

      hehe. So true.

      I was at CompUSA the other day and they tried to sell me a warranty on a harddrive that already had a warranty.

      Best Buy and all of the others pull this crap also.

      I felt like I was buying a car.

    11. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped in at CC looking for some ps/2 stuff, and asked if they had any tivo's.

      They had one, without a box, manual, or remote. It was a series one. They wanted $299 for it, with a $399 regular price. ($100 off because of the missing remote, manual, and box)

      I showed the salesman that bestbuy has a series 2 for $399 with more drive space, and a usb port.

      The salesman looked confused, went to the back to talk to the manager, and came back without moving from the price.

      Dumbass.

    12. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I'm not aware they arrest people for comparison shopping....

    13. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2
      heh. One night, I went there to look at memory sticks. I got pested by one, fair enough, told them it is ok, I'm just browsing to see what's out there.

      2 minutes later, got hit by another one. Annoying, but still put them away politely.

      1 minute later ANOTHER one. Now I start to get upset.

      3 minutes later YET ANOTHER. needless to say, this one got the terse 'NO!' along with the full glare.

      I didn't get bothered again from then on.

      The funny thing is, when I actually DO go there READY TO BUY, I cannot get a salesperson to come over even if I jump around on one leg and wave my arms around like a chicken.

    14. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by MojoRising · · Score: 0

      Only if Indie music was worth lisening to...

      Robert

    15. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by guinsu · · Score: 2

      What like Jade Tree or Revalation Records, Touch and Go or Sub Pop? Best Buy has a better selection than my local indie store, even when it comes to indie releases.

    16. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Kyeo · · Score: 1

      best buy's CD collection is great if you only shop for RIAA artists. try to find someone from an indie label, though.

      Thats odd, I seem to have bought quite a few fugazi cds from there.

    17. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by hiei · · Score: 1

      I got into CC quite often to look at games and cd's. They often have cd's I want, which aren't typically found in the price gauging places like Sam Goody for around $12.99 or so. And I've picked up quite a few Playstation and Dreamcast games there for $10-$20 when they weren't even that old. Never had a problem with sales people either...I typically walk in, get what I want, and leave quickly.

      --
      Upgrade your grey matter, cause one day it may matter
    18. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in college I went into Radio Shack with a fellow student who needed a new bread-board. When asked if they had any bread-boards the sales guy says:

      "Sorry, we only carry specific electronic type things here. If you wan't general household things you'll have to try Sears"

      After the shock wore off we almost died laughing.

    19. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, when I actually DO go there READY TO BUY, I cannot get a salesperson to come over even if I jump around on one leg and wave my arms around like a chicken.

      This is when you use the "may I help you" routine from Wayne's World. You just start really messing with stuff, unhooking cables, turning volumn knobs, creating large stacks of electronics, etc. True, it's childish, but it works and it's still funny to push people's buttons.

    20. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Jebus_the_spork · · Score: 0

      i dunno man, seein how as i WORK there, i can tell you first hand we have tens of thousands of cd's. if you can't find anything close to what you are looking for, you listen to some weird sh!t

      --
      I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows - Bart Simpson
    21. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by TechFusion · · Score: 1

      I went to Circuit City one time...
      I was shopping for 512mb of ram to add to my existing system of 512mb. The sales person informed me that he "...never heard of a computer that could take an entire Gigabyte of RAM." Needless to say, I went to another local computer store and now have a nifty rig w/ enough ram to choke a mule.

    22. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Suckers shop there. I absolutely hate that store! The sales people are idiots and everything is overpriced.

    23. Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I shop there, they're a lot better than best buy! When you go to best buy, try to find a blue shirt. They're always clumped together, talking about go knows what. then if you finally get them over, they know absolutly nothing! I don't mind being asked for help by knowledgable staff.

  6. Thank Jebus... by LinuxCumShot · · Score: 1

    ...that they still sell turntables!
    :)

    --
    -- OMFG = Oh My Floatse Goatse
    1. Re:Thank Jebus... by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 1

      if they didn't sell turntables, i'd have no ravers to beat up on the weekends, and i've have to settle for beating up linux geeks.

      See, with vinyl, everybody wins.

    2. Re:Thank Jebus... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      turntables are now for making music, not listening to it. scratch-a scratch-a scratch-a Yo Yo!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:Thank Jebus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that they do indeed sell turntables.
      Please tell me you knew that...

    4. Re:Thank Jebus... by LinuxCumShot · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have never been to the united states, and therefore never been to circuit city, so, no, i really had no idea if they sold them or not. I assumed they did, they are still somewhat popular.

      --
      -- OMFG = Oh My Floatse Goatse
    5. Re:Thank Jebus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, what about raver linux geeks?

    6. Re:Thank Jebus... by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 1

      They get the shit kicked out of them regardless.

    7. Re:Thank Jebus... by colmore · · Score: 2

      there is still new music that can only be found on vinyl. and a great many things that have never been reissued.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    8. Re:Thank Jebus... by tenman · · Score: 2

      sweet, that was a funky little ditty groove that you had going on there...

      you should have added a little rurr-ruurrr-shhhh-shwaaaa-ruuur-ruuuuuur-"an..."-s wash-"and..."-ruuur-swash-"and it goes a little something like this"....

    9. Re:Thank Jebus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it might be unhealthy to try to kick the shit out of ESR.

  7. good news for linux? by tps12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the (many!) drawbacks of VHS is that it is analog; there is no reasonable way of watching a VHS tape on one's computer. With DVDs, of course, all it takes is a cheap drive and a halfway decent video card, and you're set.

    It just so happens that one of the many things at which Linux excels is in viewing DVDs (I have seen articles claim 25% better framerates vs. Windows). Not to mention that many of the set-top boxes that people are starting to hook up to their TVs run Linux rather than Windows.

    The increased popularity of DVDs over VHS is bound to improve Linux mindshare and marketshare.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:good news for linux? by tiltowait · · Score: 2

      >The increased popularity of DVDs over VHS is bound to improve Linux mindshare and marketshare.

      Yes, and Spiderman is an allegory for our post-911 globalism. Quit trying to Katz-connect everything. Who the hell watches movies on computers?

    2. Re:good news for linux? by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that you actually managed to turn this into a "good for linux" post. This is a sad day for humanity.

      Do us all a favor and kill yourself so I don't have to go all the way to where you are to pull your head out of you ass so I can shove my boot up there. Fucking people contaminating an otherwise perfectly chaotic genepool...

    3. Re:good news for linux? by karnal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      ????

      25% better framerates?

      This didn't just turn into a Quake3 AMD vs Intel style discussion, did it?

      I know you're joking. Do you know I'm joking?

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:good news for linux? by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 1, Informative
      The increased popularity of DVDs over VHS is bound to improve Linux mindshare and marketshare.

      Except that all the good DVD playing software for Linux is illegal.

    5. Re:good news for linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      there is no reasonable way of watching a VHS tape on one's computer.
      In that case, I guess it wasn't reasonable of me to have a Booktree card with a VCR hooked up to it... I guess I'll just close this big ol' Xawtv window I was using to watch my VHS tapes. What WAS I thinking?
    6. Re:good news for linux? by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1

      All those people with PVRs boast about saving time watching TV by pausing the first 20 minutes and then skipping ads. Since DVDs don't have ads (at least not as interruptions), playing them substantially faster than 60fields/second is the obvious step. (Isn't there supposed to be some graceful way to drop audio samples so everyone doesn't sound like chipmunks?)

    7. Re:good news for linux? by PacoTaco · · Score: 1
      With DVDs, of course, all it takes is a cheap drive and a halfway decent video card, and you're set.

      Perfect! Circuit City is full of computers with cheap drives and halfway decent video cards.

    8. Re:good news for linux? by colmore · · Score: 2

      college students do.

      in the past year, i have seen probably over 100 DVDs, all of them either on a computer monitor, or played off of a PS2.

      If I've allready payed a few hundred bucks for a 19 inch screen, I'm not dropping more cash (and giving up more space) for another CRT, especially given that I don't watch television.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    9. Re:good news for linux? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      I can't believe that there was anyone out there stupid enough to somehow connect this with Linux. I saw the "all the good Linux software is illegal post" and then had to back up to find out what on earth the parent was smoking to try and decide this could some how be good for Linux.

      Either they're joking (in which case they're still smoking some good stuff, since it isn't funny) or their really, really stupid.

      In either case, please do what you can about ramming your boot up their ass as soon as their head vacates the general area. I wholeheartedly support you.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    10. Re:good news for linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These articles must be bullshit. In order to play a DVD, your computer must achieve decoding the MPEG-2 and optionally, the AC3 audio in real time, which is 29.97fps in a NTSC world, 25fps in a PAL region. As soon as it can achieve that framerate, it sticks to it. It does not render more frames a second like a video game, it plays the video at a constant framerate. If it cannot achieve the framerate designated on the DVD and/or by the player (some software players allow to play DVDs at 24fps, bypassing pulldown), the video will stutter like DivX on a Pentium 90.

      Moral of the story? There is no 25% "better" framerates in Linux for video. Either the video plays at the framerate it was encoded at, or stutters trying to achieve that framerate. Optimized drivers may make it easier to achieve the full framerate, but that depends on the drivers/card used.

    11. Re:good news for linux? by treat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It just so happens that one of the many things at which Linux excels is in viewing DVDs


      Except that 1) you are committing a crime by posessing a DVD player for Linux, 2) The DVD players for Linux have terrible user interfaces, 3) The DVD players for Linux are unreliable at best, 4) The DVD players for Linux are some of the only software that can cause the entire X server to crash.

    12. Re:good news for linux? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "One of the (many!) drawbacks of VHS is that it is analog; there is no reasonable way of watching a VHS tape on one's computer."

      On the flip side, they can't prevent you from capturing VHS to a PC. Unfortunately, DVD's make it a lot harder for you to do that. And since DVD's are digital, they can concievably mutate the standard to force you to take new steps to rip them.

      Heh I wonder if I can take my firewire video camera and get it to capture NTSC somehow. There isn't a jack to do that. Pity because once the video's on tape (at broadcast quality...) I can run it down the Firewire port and have a perfect copy of it, ready for encoding.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    13. Re:good news for linux? by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It just so happens that one of the many things at which Linux excels is in viewing DVDs (I have seen articles claim 25% better framerates vs. Windows).

      Quit yer trolling...if you're getting 29.97 fps, you're getting as much out of a DVD as you can.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:good news for linux? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      All those people with PVRs boast about saving time watching TV by pausing the first 20 minutes and then skipping ads. Since DVDs don't have ads (at least not as interruptions), playing them substantially faster than 60 fields/second is the obvious step.

      If you buy PAL DVDs and play them on your region-free DVD player, they should be sped up by about 4-5%. FilmNTSC transfers are telecined with a 3:2 pulldown that generates one extra frame for every four frames of film. Since film runs at 24 fps and NTSC runs at 29.97 fps, the film is actually slowed down just a little bit (to 23.976 fps). In a filmPAL transfer, though, they just speed up the film and telecine it at 25 fps.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    15. Re:good news for linux? by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      VLC isn't that bad at all actually, and AFAIK, the DMCA doesn't apply to Canada yet so I should be ok.

    16. Re:good news for linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the anecdotal note front:

      1. True enough.
      2. Have you tried Ogle? I'm not sure how much better an interface needs to be.
      3. Ogle's never failed (unless I didn't have the libdvdcss installed - but that's note 1).
      4. I haven't seen that (yet).

      In short, have you tried Ogle?..

  8. This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember the days when a VHS movie cost $65+?

    I love DVDs, this is the perfect example of how competition lowers prices. However, if VHS becomes rare, competition will go down and prices, up. I hope that they lose money o nthis and decide to stock VHS again, soon.

    I never liked CC anyways, salespeople on commission are so annoying!

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    1. Re:This isn't such great news... by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      if VHS becomes rare, competition will go down and prices, up

      Exactly! Look at the sky high prices on 8-track tapes these days due to decreased competition. But seriously, you're ignoring the fact that competition goes down due to decreased demand.

    2. Re:This isn't such great news... by eXtro · · Score: 1

      This doesn't really follow, the same company presently puts out both VHS and DVD versions of a movie. For instance, you can't sock it to the man by buying the VHS version of Little Mermaid. The man makes money off both versions. The price difference comes about mostly due to the cost of manufacture. The DVDs are stamped, the VHS tapes have to go through a recording process. The only way competition would come into play would be if seperate companies distributed the DVD and VHS versions.

    3. Re:This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 2

      Erm...
      "Competition goes down due to decreased demand."?
      I hope you've never taken a course in economics. Decreased demand only means one thing: Lower prices. Competition might go up or down, depending on the business model and market. Right now, for instance, competition is *incredibly* fierce in the PC market precisely because demand is so low.

      Your point is also invalid. 8-track tapes are a 20 year-old, obsolete technology. How many people own an 8-track player?

      My point is simple: Without competing technologies, prices go up. It's a simple economic principal.

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    4. Re:This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 2

      You do have a valid point; if mor than one company could distribute a movie, prices would certainly be much lower. But your argument says that DVDs are cheaper to produce, but VHS costs 1/2 to 1/3 the price of a DVD movie. Why?

      Because consumer preference and performance, mostly.

      Anyways, keep in mind that a company can and does compete with itself; a consumer doesn't know that it's the same company making a DVd and a VHS, they simple choose one or the other, and price is a major factor. If a DVD were to cost say, $200 and the VHS only $10, clearly DVd sales would plummet.

      That is an extreme example to make a point; VHS and DVDs do actually compete with each other. Competition lowers prices.

      This is why they want to drop the VHS format, to raise prices (and profit)

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    5. Re:This isn't such great news... by Zack · · Score: 1

      Decreased demand only means one thing: Lower prices.

      I gotta disagree with the "only" thing. Have you taken anything besides intro econ?

      Lower prices will eventually lead to an decreased supply, which would lead to higher prices. Additonally, it may eventually reach a point where it no longers enjoys economy of scale and thus becomes MUCH more expensive.

      Without competing technologies, prices go up. It's a simple economic principal.

      That has nothing to do with economic principal. Without competition prices will go up, not competeing technology. If you don't believe me, look at Gateway, HP, Dell, etc. They all sell the same technology, yet their competition keeps prices "down".

    6. Re:This isn't such great news... by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. When a technology becomes obsolete, most manufacturers will stop producing it. Therefore, the few that don't can raise their prices. (because there is always someone who still needs that tape.)

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    7. Re:This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 1

      I've taken much more than intro to economics, here's my reply to your assertions:
      1. Your decreased supply to higher prices. Yes, it usually will; but the *dominating effect* (to use the econ term) will always be the decreased demand, thus prices will always be lower (but maybe not as low as you predect initially).

      leae note that I say "only" not to say there is only one effect, but to counter something said in a previous comment.

      2. The difference between competition and competing technology is a matter of definition. Your own example is my own argument: Competition (any type, replacement goods in the case of DVD/VHS) lowers prices. You just strengthen my argument here.

      Re-read the comment I was replying to, I think you'll find that you agree with my reply.

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    8. Re:This isn't such great news... by ph0rk · · Score: 1

      no.

      VHS movies had dropped in price well before DVD players were sold, much less mainstream.

      VHS tapes dropped in price because people actually began desiring to buy them. Well, that and home VCRs and HBO meant lots of unsold $65-85 movies.

      i don't expect that the lack of "competition" will drive up prices of DVD movies. besides, if you've watched both formats, you'd know already that there is no competition!

      (don't say VCD or i'll have to smack you)

      --
      semantics are everything!
    9. Re:This isn't such great news... by james_orr · · Score: 1

      While it may cost less to produce a DVD than a VHS tape, there are other costs involved with DVD production. You don't think those actors and directors do those commentaries for free do you? Not to mention all the other special features ... somebody has to get paid for them.

    10. Re:This isn't such great news... by Mark+Pitman · · Score: 1
      Does anyone remember the days when a VHS movie cost $65+? I love DVDs, this is the perfect example of how competition lowers prices.

      Movies on VHS dropped down to the $20 - $25 price range long before DVD was widely available. Yes, VHS seems to have dropped in price slightly since DVD has become more mainstream, but not that drasticly.

    11. Re:This isn't such great news... by Zack · · Score: 1

      You're still ignoring when demand drops below the point of economies of scale, which will lead to MUCH higher prices. Of course, you have to determine how elastic the demand and supply are in order to really understand it.

      Okay, one more thing, in a competative environment, companies do not make an economic profit, correct? So when the demand drops, and price drops, then firms who are in that market either start losing money, or retreat from the market. Which lowers supply, which raises prices.... etc etc etc until it reaches a new balance.

      But it is possible that decreased demand can lead to less compition due to firms leaving the market.

      (Wow.. haven't been in an econ discussion in a while... I was only 3 classes away from an econ degree but decided the two I already had was good enough)

      that all make sense?

    12. Re:This isn't such great news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a recent article on this situation on wired, I believe. It focused initially on napster, kazaa, etc but used vhs tapes as an example.

      The price drop wasn't due to competition between dvd and vhs formats. Rather, it was due to the fact that the industry didn't expect people to buy these things for home viewing. They figured people would primarily rent them.

      When the price dropped a bit, the demand increased. They dropped low enough when they realized that the market existed.

      Now, they *know* the market exists. The price won't ever go back up, because the industry knows that the market will evaporate.

    13. Re:This isn't such great news... by MojoRising · · Score: 0

      Uh who cares if the prices of VHS go up? Once I start using a DVD palyer and buy DVDs, I do not car about the price of VHS movies.

      As for the price of DVDs, there is enough competition between stores to keep their price low.

      Robert

    14. Re:This isn't such great news... by JonWan · · Score: 1

      Well not *all* movies.

      The One

      and there are more.

    15. Re:This isn't such great news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VHS list prices are still high (often over $100), and remain high the first few months a video is released, and are only priced to sell after Blockbuster, Hollywood Video and their ilk have made their money. Some videos never get marked down to sell. This is especially true of foreign movies and independent movies. For example, facets.org currently lists Wayne Wang's Center of the World at $106.99 for VHS, $14.98 for the DVD. In fact, since the movie has been out for a year now, you can find it elsewhere on VHS for $14.95 or less.

      In sum, I don't think "competition" between formats has anything to do with the low prices of DVD's in this market. But I do think the industry is structuring prices to provide disincentives for the continued of use of VHS. So, yeah, if VHS dies, expect to pay more for your DVD's.

    16. Re:This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 2

      Yes, it makes sense. But take a look at my original argument, I was addressing this statement:
      "competition goes down due to low demand"

      Which I'm sure you'd agree with me, is a misleading at best, totally false at worst statement.

      But hey, at least I finally found an intelligent poster on /. :)

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    17. Re:This isn't such great news... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 2

      you're missing my point, I in no way stated that DVDs made VHS tapes drop from $65 to the $8 they are now. My point is that VHS has dropped due to DVD (Seriously, before DVD could you ever find a new release hit movie for under $30? Now they're about $15! Older movies are $5).

      But it works both ways, DVDs lower VHS prices, and the low price of VHS forced DVDs to have lower prices. It's a simple economic principal, dealing with "substitute goods."

      --

      Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
    18. Re:This isn't such great news... by Zack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd go with misleading. I can agree with that.. but eventually low demand can mean less compition... eventually....

      But hey, at least I finally found an intelligent poster on /. :)

      Finally? I've been here for a while. ;-)

    19. Re:This isn't such great news... by martyn+s · · Score: 2

      I *might* buy that argument, except CDs don't have any extra "commentaries" or features that cassettes don't have. What's *their* excuse?

  9. Ironic by sheepab · · Score: 1

    Circuit City Phases Out VHS
    This coming from the creators of Divx.
    I do have to say though, once you get used to DVD's, VHS just seems so, dirty. You feel grody after watching a VHS tape, like you've cheated on your faithful DVD player or something...*shivers*

    1. Re:Ironic by grytpype · · Score: 1

      >You feel grody after watching a VHS tape, like you've cheated on your faithful DVD player or something

      Depends on what kind of tape you're watching!

      --

      - Have a picture

    2. Re:Ironic by asukaikari · · Score: 1

      when are they going to phase out divx?

  10. I suppose this by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is one of the first legitimate signs that DVD is here to stay. Obviously circut city beleives that they are now outdated. I just wish that more obscure and/or old films and shows would come out on dvd. I need the good ole' VCR to watch my stupidly huge collection of "V" episodes...

    --

    1. Re:I suppose this by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1

      I've seen the first and second mini-series on DVD. Not sure about the TV series that followed but, it was disappointing anyway.

    2. Re:I suppose this by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Actually, i'd bet this is simply a way to get back valuable shelf space from a low-profit-margin, slow selling product. DVD players sell much better now, and with the prices down below $100 for an 'acceptible' player, there is simply no real signifigant demand for VHS decks.

      I agree with the earlier comment: this is the company that believed in Dixv (the crappy DVD version). Hell, this is the company that made me give them my name, address and blood type just to buy a spindle of Cdr's. They aren't really the type that are very good at looking forward.

    3. Re:I suppose this by Pheran · · Score: 1

      Yes, they should bring out some of those obscure films on DVD like "Star Wars".

    4. Re:I suppose this by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Where "stupidly huge" is any number greater than 0? (Although I did lke it when that girl unlocked her jaw and ate the guinea pig.)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  11. Camcorders, security cameras? by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I assume there will still be a niche market for security cameras and camcorder type cameras.

    On the plus side, if anyone is looking for a good security camera program that is open source, I recommend "Motion". I was going to use a VHS based security setup, but went with it instead, with VHS as a backup un case the computer crashes.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Camcorders, security cameras? by Dr.+Ion · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to "Motion"? I'm looking to set up something like this.

      As you can imagine, a search for "motion security camera open source" didn't turn up the right things.

    2. Re:Camcorders, security cameras? by Dr.+Ion · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Camcorders, security cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why one should check with Freshmeat first.

  12. hmmm... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone else remember the far-sighted and insightful (ha) judge in the DeCSS case that said hey, you don't need to make excerpts from DVDs, because the analog format is available?

    Not that I'm crying about the loss of VHS tapes, that's for sure. As soon as PVRs have built-in DVD writers, clunky tapes that operate by scraping against a metal disk will be a distant memory.

    1. Re:hmmm... by unformed · · Score: 2

      Not that I'm crying about the loss of VHS tapes, that's for sure. As soon as PVRs have built-in DVD writers, clunky tapes that operate by scraping against a metal disk will be a distant memory.

      Exactly, tapes died down when CDRs become in general use; as soon as DVDRs become another general consumer product, with taping and transfers available from different media, VHS will die down; until then VHS (converted from 8mm, digital, etc) will still be used for home movies, and things like that.

  13. Keep in mind by joeflies · · Score: 5, Informative

    that this article is about phasing out pre-recorded VHS tapes. It doesn't say that it will phase out VCRs.

    1. Re:Keep in mind by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      Actually, it says 'VHS product'. The article does quote a guy saying "How much profit margin can be left in selling VCRs?". They aren't really to specific as to whether or not this means blank VHS and decks, but i wouldn't doubt it.

    2. Re:Keep in mind by Uruk · · Score: 2

      VCRs are going to be a whole lot harder to kill. Even this phasing out of VHS is mostly targetted at new sales of movies. But VHS is everywhere, from budget video surveillance systems, to home movie collections, and many other applications that don't have anything to do with the MPAA or movies. :)

      Eventually, VCRs will be the kind of long forgotten technical oddity that ends up in an electronics museum, but that's still going to be a while.

      --
      -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
    3. Re:Keep in mind by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

      VHS will always be big, as long as Walmart sells the Godfather Trilogy for $26 on VHS but at around $75 on DVD.

    4. Re:Keep in mind by xtremex · · Score: 2

      Cassettes were everywhere too. I still have over 1,000 casettes...I did upgrade alot of them. I no longer BUY cassettes, but I will never toss my collection. (I am a big 80's metal fan :)) Do you have any idea how much it would cost to upgrade my collection? Plus, I don't have the time or the desire to transfer all my cassettes to CD.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    5. Re:Keep in mind by elemental23 · · Score: 2

      From the article:

      Circuit City will continue to carry blank VHS tape and VCRs, he added.

      The comment about VCRs was from Charles Van Horn, president of the International Recording Media Association, not from a Circuit City representative.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    6. Re:Keep in mind by tedDancin · · Score: 1
      this article is about phasing out pre-recorded VHS tapes. It doesn't say that it will phase out VCRs.

      My thoughts the technology:

      • VHS = Cassette tape
      • DVD = CD

      I think we'll end up with VCR's still hanging around for a while, in the same way Cassette tape players hung around in stereo systems for years (and still do). People need something to be able to watch their taped episodes of Colombo with. Or is that just me?
      --

      Ladies, form queue here -->
    7. Re:Keep in mind by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Of course you do. Just get a P2P file sharing proggie and there you are. Music *wants* to be free!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    8. Re:Keep in mind by laserjet · · Score: 2

      My fiance gave me the DVD set... wow. Both are an exellent set to own... your friends would be jealous.

      and at $75, I still think it was worth every penny.. especially since I didn't pay for it. :)

      But you raise a point: It drives me nuts that DVDs are actually cheaper to produce than VHS tapes, yet they artificially raise the price, just like CDs. When they are cheaper than VHS is the day they will be more popular.

      Another thing I hate is that while most people have a DVD player or are planning to get one, video rental stores have nowhere NEAR the collection of DVD's as they do DVD's. I mean not even close. I like renting movies, and I rent 95% of them on VHS.

      I think the future (5 years + from now) is in movie-on-demand via Cable and Sattelite. (yes, I know pay-per -view has been available for quite some time, but the infrastructure is coming together to offer digital on demand videos). A pirates dream.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    9. Re:Keep in mind by xtremex · · Score: 2

      Trust me..80% of the cassettes I have were indies...I've already made the ones that I could digital..I believe I'm the only one who has or wants the original :)

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  14. Sha nanana, Sha nanana Hey hey hey, Goodbye! by t0qer · · Score: 0

    Except for the price of DVD, DVD 0wnz3s VHS. Personally i'm happy VHS is going the way of the dinosaur.

  15. Forcing the market change by M_Talon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is just the next step in the evolution of the format. Now that it's gained customer acceptance, the stores can get rid of the inferior technology (VHS) and concentrate their business. It happened with audio cassettes (vinyl was killed), and it happened with CDs (bye bye cassettes).

    As far as being a premature move, everyone that I talk to nowadays either has a DVD player or plans on getting one within the year. Sounds like the perfect opportunity for the stores to push those last few stragglers to DVD by eliminating the VHS market for new releases.

    Besides, wouldn't you rather have more room on the shelves for the latest anime imports? ;)

    --
    Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
    1. Re:Forcing the market change by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Circuit city sells DVD players, it is in their best interest to coerce people into purchasing a DVD player. One of the easiest ways to do this is to make it more difficult to get the movies people want to see on VHS. If Circuit City can convince millions of people tha their VHS player is obsolete then they make out like bandits.

    2. Re:Forcing the market change by radish · · Score: 5, Informative

      It happened with audio cassettes (vinyl was killed)

      Really? That's strange. I could have sworn that last time I was in the Virgin Megastore in central London they dedicated at least 10% of their total floorspace (including CD/DVD/games etc) to vinyl. I must have been imagining it.

      Note to the unwise - vinyl sales are on the up, they have been for 5 years. At least 50% of the major single releases each week are available on vinyl. 100% of dance oriented ones are. The vast majority of dance music (the biggest selling sector in europe) is ONLY available on vinyl.

      And turntables regularly out-do guitars in the annual christmas gift surveys :-)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Forcing the market change by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      The only thing is that cassette players were still around until cdr's became popular, as CD's did not replace the recording aspect of cassettes. Nothing currently replaces the recording features of VHS, expect tivo's (costly, and not under consumer control) and DVD-r's (not currently available en masse.)

    4. Re:Forcing the market change by WiKKeSH · · Score: 1

      It happened with audio cassettes (vinyl was killed), and it happened with CDs (bye bye cassettes).

      Maybe this is a little off topic, but vinyl was never killed, rather it has become a specialized market.
      Some people (not me) even argue that cds are inferior to vinyl. :)

    5. Re:Forcing the market change by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1
      Nothing currently replaces the recording features of VHS, expect tivo's (costly, and not under consumer control) and DVD-r's (not currently available en masse.)

      Check out Terapin's CD Video Recorder. At $500, it's a little pricey, but that is what you seem to be asking for: Something on a consumer scale that can record video on cheap media.

    6. Re:Forcing the market change by CanadaDave · · Score: 2
      As far as being a premature move, everyone that I talk to nowadays either has a DVD player or plans on getting one within the year

      I have delayed in purchasing a DVD player due to the price. But this latest development should help decrease the price even more! Woohoo.

    7. Re:Forcing the market change by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 5, Funny

      Note to the unwise - vinyl sales are on the up, they have been for 5 years. At least 50% of the major single releases each week are available on vinyl. 100% of dance oriented ones are. The vast majority of dance music (the biggest selling sector in europe) is ONLY available on vinyl.

      "Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continue... AAY!"

      And turntables regularly out-do guitars in the annual christmas gift surveys

      I don't care, I'm still going to replace my record collection with my own guitar playing.

    8. Re:Forcing the market change by phutureboy · · Score: 1

      Yep, supposedly there's more vinyl being sold
      now than at any point in history. Long live vinyl.

    9. Re:Forcing the market change by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, dance music and vinyl are always entwined because of how dance music is DJed. Yes, dance music is much more popular in Europe than here in the states. Yes, vinyl sales are up over the last 5 years.

      Now the bad part:
      Vinyl sales are down 90% from 1989 and probably much more from 1979, but I can't find good numbers pre-1989.

      If you were to walk in to any major chain store in the US and ask where they kept the LPs, they would look at you like you were from another planet.

      -B

    10. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot more "ab energizers" and cans of spray-on fake hair being sold now than at any point in history, too. What's your point?

    11. Re:Forcing the market change by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

      Please Read

      The consumer did not Choose inferior Cd's over Vinyl, we were forced. Just like we will be forced to choose DVD.

    12. Re:Forcing the market change by Hard_Code · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I won't convert to DVD until it is completely safe of DMCA/UBDTCADFDSASBXCASFAF/copyright-gestapo restrictions. We fall so easily for the same old trick. Now we have to repurchase all our old content because VHS is being phased out (just like we had to pay x2 to upgrade to CD)? No thanks, I'd rather *legally* digitize my copy-unrestricted VHS tapes and burn them onto (if it is DVDR I'll already be unduly taxed for "piracy"). In fact, the first thing I'm going to do after I purchase the new VHS movie I want today, is to download *legally* a DivXed copy (save myself the trouble of digitization). Just watch 10 years from now it will be flourescent video disc technology and we will be on the same upgrade treadmill throwing away mountains of DVDs and repurchasing our property all over again.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    13. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vinyl is only superior to CD if you plan to listen to the LP exactly one time.

    14. Re:Forcing the market change by ph0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you walk in to any major chain store and ask where they kept all the music that didn't suck they'd probably look at you the same way.

      --
      semantics are everything!
    15. Re:Forcing the market change by the_rev_matt · · Score: 2

      For less afluent people, CDs/CD players are too expensive. Which, of course, puts DVD players way out of their range. But I guess it's OK for poor people to not be able to afford entertainment, right?

      I don't have a DVD player yet, and don't have plans to get one. I rent movies once in a while, I tape shows to watch at my convenience a *lot*. And don't give me that "You should just get a Tivo" bullshit. Not everyone spends their every last penny on geek toys. Some of us have families to support.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    16. Re:Forcing the market change by bill_guts · · Score: 1

      VHS Tapes will be the next thing to go big on eBay, just like rare vinyl goes for top $$$. Soon VHS tapes will do the same. And my friends will say "VHS just has a better feel to it than DVD." Stock up now while the prices are low!

      --


    17. Re:Forcing the market change by Clue4All · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about (or should I say aboot)? A usable (not excellent, but decent) DVD player is under $100 US. What exactly is it that you're waiting for?

      --

      Is your browser retarded?
    18. Re:Forcing the market change by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      He's waiting for an apology from the creators of "South Park: Bigger, Better, Uncut" for their slanderous, anti-Canadian diatribe.

      "You know who scares me? Canadians. On a quiet night in Buffalo, you can hear them up there, sharpening their skates, just waiting to attack."

      (Before anyone gets on my ass, I spent my honeymoon in Canada. Lovely place. And they're more than welcome to make all the US jokes they want.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    19. Re:Forcing the market change by szquirrel · · Score: 1

      Really? That's strange. I could have sworn that last time I was in the Virgin Megastore in central London they dedicated at least 10% of their total floorspace (including CD/DVD/games etc) to vinyl. I must have been imagining it.

      Vinyl is to audio what 35mm is to video. If projecting 35mm was as easy as playing vinyl, 35mm would have its own 10% of the Virgin Megastore. But you still wouldn't see either at Beast Buy because CD and DVD are good enough for 99.9% of everyone.

      VHS compares better to cassette tape -- inferior in every way but still useful for recording. Both will continue to die slowly as digital recording gets easier and cheaper.

      --
      Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    20. Re:Forcing the market change by Artifex · · Score: 2

      In fact, the first thing I'm going to do after I purchase the new VHS movie I want today, is to download *legally* a DivXed copy (save myself the trouble of digitization).

      Just remember that it's not legal for you to download and use any content that isn't part of the original VHS tape you bought, like deleted scenes, director commentary, or anything else added only to the digital format; those are all covered by separate copyright.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    21. Re:Forcing the market change by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      Nobody makes you repurchase your content just because it's out in a new format. But people will do it because new formats are generally superior in some way to old ones, ie vhs -> dvd.

      That being said, you have a good point about digitizing VHS movies instead of fscking around with DeCSS-type stuff. Too bad the public isn't with you, and as such, VHS will one day die. No, moreso than VHS dying, fair use rights with video will die.

      Shed a tear.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    22. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know disco record sales were up 500% for year end 1976?

      If these trends continue......Heyyyyyyy!

    23. Re:Forcing the market change by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      Now we have to repurchase all our old content because VHS is being phased out

      Why do you have to repurchase your old content? Are you watching your tapes so frequently you are wearing them out (if you have kids, then I can definitly see this happening). You already stated that you would just make backups anyway. Who's going to push that big red button rendering the earths supply of vcr's inoperable?

      The albums that I've replaced with cd were because of the convenience of cd or lp (those CE bastards, how could they) and/or the better quality of the recording. Apparently you upgraded because you thought you were supposed to?

    24. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because having no customers is so much better than having few customers!

    25. Re:Forcing the market change by foobar104 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is interesting. There's a new type of Ludditism. Instead of rejecting technology prima facie, you're rejecting technologies based on what you call "copyright gestapo restrictions."

      For a contrary opinion to that popularly expressed by Slashdotters, head over to the avsforum.com HDTV recorders posting board. There you'll find lots of people enthusiastically supporting copy protection methods like JVC's D-Theater format. Why? Because they know that without those sorts of protections-- or restrictions, if you prefer-- the studios will never release their movies in 1080i format on any medium. A movie recorded in high-bit-rate 1080i is very close, when viewed on consumer gear with a slightly forgiving eye, to an HD master. Studios simply won't release near-master-quality tapes or discs unless they're confident that those movies won't be copied like crazy.

      I like owning and watching high-quality movies; that's why I've invested in a high-definition TV, a DVD player, and a collection of DVDs. I'm not interested in making copies of my movies, so the fact that I'm (a) not allowed to, and (b) prevented from doing so doesn't bother me in the least.

      So I vocally support copy protection-- or restriction, or prevention, or whatever you want to call it. Without it, I won't be able to watch movies in high definition, and that'd be disappointing. Every time somebody pirates a video, CD, or DVD, they make it ever so slightly less likely that I'll be able to get the kind of entertainment I want in the future.

    26. Re:Forcing the market change by Jonavin · · Score: 2

      Just hop over to FutureShop (aka BestBuy Canada). They have models for less than CDN$100, although I can speak for the quality of those. For about CDN$200 (not much more than a VCR) you can get a pretty decent named brand DVD with 5.1 audio.

    27. Re:Forcing the market change by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "You already stated that you would just make backups anyway. Who's going to push that big red button rendering the earths supply of vcr's inoperable?"

      * one day the VHS tapes will inevitably degrade to being unusable
      * same thing goes for VCRs
      * I can back up my content digitally, but there is no guarantee that the MPAA/DVD industry won't simply refuse to play any DVDs that haven't been stamped with their particular copy-restriction technology, rendering my backups unusable
      * So basically I have to wait it out until some technology comes along that will allow me to restore and use my backups
      * Until that day, *which may never come*, the media industry has rendered my content worthless

      Now ask yourself the same then about data on your hard drive. How comfortable would you be if the hard drive industry could just forcefully deprecate all current hard drives and force all new hard drives to carry "officially stamped" data, rendering your data useless?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    28. Re:Forcing the market change by svferris · · Score: 3, Funny

      A friend of mine recently went into a record store and asked where the vinyl was. The guy looked at him and said "What's a vinyl?".

      I can just imagine it was the epitome of the pimply-faced kid from Simpsons.

      "I'll have to check with my manager on that..."

    29. Re:Forcing the market change by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 2

      >Note to the unwise - vinyl sales are on the up, >they have been for 5 years. At least 50% of the >major single releases each week are available on >vinyl. 100% of dance oriented ones are. The vast >majority of dance music (the biggest selling >sector in europe) is ONLY available on vinyl. Yeah but many argue (quite rightfully) that vinyl has a warm quality and a mystique to it that CD's don't have. VHS has no such advantage over DVD. Unlike Vinyl/CD's, DVD truly is superior to VHS in every manner, fashion and form.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    30. Re:Forcing the market change by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "But I guess it's OK for poor people to not be able to afford entertainment, right?"

      If I recall correctly it is the poor that are the largest consumers of popular entertainment. Which makes this even more a crime. Because us (relatively) rich geeks can just go out and upgrade or hack around with our thousands of dollars of PC equipment while the poor are hoodwinked into a higher and higher barrier to participation in culture. And that is an utter shame.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    31. Re:Forcing the market change by arkanes · · Score: 2

      You know, no matter what this guy says, I don't know ANYONE who bemoans the "loss" of vinyl, and I only know OF a couple people. The vast majority of vinyl freaks will, instead, go out of thier way to tell me how much vinyl is still in the game, like the guy who posted above. And CDs are a vastly superior technology, subjective issues about sound quality aside. I never had to re-buy all my vinyl, because I never had any - by the time I moved out of my parents house, CDs were cheap and CD players were affordable, even for a teenager newly entering the workforce. I wasn't forced to choose anything - I'd picked CDs over tapes and I'd pick tapes over vinyl. They're more convenient and more durable.

    32. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Every time somebody pirates a video, CD, or DVD, they make it ever so slightly less likely that I'll be able to get the kind of entertainment I want in the future.

      I've never pirated a movie before, but I think I'll start now.

      Thanks.

    33. Re:Forcing the market change by Bartab · · Score: 1

      Well, uhm. Yes. If I"m wrong, please show me the "and entertainment" to the "Life, Liberty, etc..."

      Why should Circuit City devote floorspace to product which only has market share in a group of people unable to pay a one time cost of $69.99USD (current price at Circuit City) for a box to play it? Walmart and KMart can continue selling VHS, until MPAA stops producing them entirely.

      Me, I'm Region-restricted DVD free since 1998.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    34. Re:Forcing the market change by oni · · Score: 2

      I like owning and watching high-quality movies;

      Do you like watching them only on Tuesday?

      The reason I ask this ridiculous question is that by accepting the bonds of IP control, you accept the possibility that a studio may, for whatever reason, restrict your viewing even further. In the future, they may well decree that you can only watch a given movie on Tuesday, or that you may only watch it while sitting in a particular chair. Use your imagination and come up with something that you would object to. The problem is, it will be much more difficult to stand up to them then than it is now.

      To put it another way, since you refuse to support people who object to the studios today, there will be nobody to support you when you decide to stand against them tomorrow.

    35. Re:Forcing the market change by SirKodiak · · Score: 1
      "Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976? If these trends continue... AAY!"
      A similar quote can be produced for increasing car sales. Some popular things increase in popularity and some popular things stop being popular after a while.

      The important detail is that the popularity of vinyl is easily explained in the context of dance music. This suggests that until a superior technology comes along to replace what vinyl provides (and neither cassette tapes or CDs fit this) vinyl records will continue to be sold. However, it is unlikely that this vinyl resurgence will continue in areas where CDs are demonstrably better (listening to music at home or in the car in the manner that 95+% do).

      VHS tapes as well have this sort of niche that DVDs can't replace: recording shows off the air. Tivo is in many ways a superior alternative (though not in all ways, as it doesn't allow friends to share tapes), so it will probably continue to take market share away from VCRs.

      Cost is also an issue with Tivos, something which is not the case with movies on VHS. There is no technical reason that DVD movies have to be more expensive that VHS movies. Because of the service component of Tivo, it's unlikely that Tivo could become less expensive than VCRs. Those digital TV recorders that do not depend on a central service have a better chance of eliminating VCRs, though the marketing reality may mean that they take a while to succesfully compete with Tivo.

    36. Re:Forcing the market change by zzyzx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. There's nothing that could be done. People are forced to buy movies after all.

      If the restrictions are too onerous, no one will buy the discs.

    37. Re:Forcing the market change by gvonk · · Score: 2


      * I can back up my content digitally, but there is no guarantee that the MPAA/DVD industry won't simply refuse to play any DVDs that haven't been stamped with their particular copy-restriction technology, rendering my backups unusable

      Then I have one piece of advice for you-- get in your car and SPEED as FAST as you can to your local electronics store. Then sprint into the store, breathlessly gasping the question "where--dvd-r---recorders?"
      Buy the first one you see.
      Also pick up 10,000 dvd-r blanks (hey, you're already in the store, may as well).
      This should cover just about everything you should want to watch.
      I guaran-damn-tee you (with a few pedantic exceptions that slashdot will *cough forest cough trees* inevitably point out) that this setup will last you for life, covering the existing technology from your vcr to your dvd-r to your tv. Plus, the discs will degrade long after you're dead!

      * So basically I have to wait it out until some technology comes along that will allow me to restore and use my backups

      See above.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    38. Re:Forcing the market change by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Wow, I bet it feels nice to have so much money that you can subsidize the media industry's foray into HDTV. On the other hand, I don't really give a damn about HDTV, and don't feel it is my responsibility to subsidize opening their new market. I don't give a damn that the same old retreaded stale homogenized crap that Hollywood and the RIAA pump out now comes to me in 3200x2400 resolution at 32bit color depth. Your telivision will not be revolutionized.

      Some people don't only want to be mindless consumers. Fair use is necessary to participate in the generation of culture, for art, for literature, for many common goods of society. Currently the "media industry" has a pretty tight lock on culture - it's a one way street: they generate it and we slurp it up. When they need to turn another buck they deprecate what's currently "cool" and sell us a new retread.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    39. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably because vinyl is a material dumbass. He should have asked them where the records were. Or the LPs. Or whatever the fuck you hippies used to call them. Who the FUCK listens to LPs anymore? I just love that warm scratchy sound of a good old record don't you? Scratch SCratch Scratch Scratch. Yea, digital sucks right? Hahaha. fucking tards.

    40. Re:Forcing the market change by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      * one day the VHS tapes will inevitably degrade to being unusable

      Right, and hence your backups. Though with the sheer quantity of a given title available, unless you're trying to save something obscure, it's hard to imagine you would have any problem playing a copy.

      same thing goes for VCRs

      You can still purchase wax cylinder players that are over 100 years old, and those were sold in the thousands. And I'm talking easily purchase (just bop over to ebay and pick one up). We're talking about a device that has sold (and will continue to sell for a least a little while) in the millions. Now true, current players are POS generally, and you're lucky to get them to work 10 months, let alone 100 years, but there will still be plenty to be had.

      * I can back up my content digitally, but there is no guarantee that the MPAA/DVD industry won't simply refuse to play any DVDs that haven't been stamped with their particular copy-restriction technology, rendering my backups unusable

      Many dvd players can't play vcd's anyway (though many can). If the thing is just saved as an mpeg anyway, just make sure you keep a copy of your mpeg player around, and it won't be an issue.

      * So basically I have to wait it out until some technology comes along that will allow me to restore and use my backups * Until that day, *which may never come*, the media industry has rendered my content worthless

      Why wait, you just need to _preserve_ the technology. Just as you're preserving the content. What's strange about that. If you are saving your lp collection, you wouldn't through your player away and then complain that cd players won't play your albums and wait for Sony to come out with a retro dvd-lp player would you? Heck, as stated earlier, you can still purchase NEW turntables, an allegedly "extinct" format.

      Now ask yourself the same then about data on your hard drive. How comfortable would you be if the hard drive industry could just forcefully deprecate all current hard drives and force all new hard drives to carry "officially stamped" data, rendering your data useless?

      No problem, I'll just make sure that any data that I have archived that I wish to read in the future, that I keep working versions of the mechanisms to read them.

      Once again, I think the key point here is sheer market penetration and quantities of players/readers available. Unless you're talking marginal technologies (no not Beta, we're talking really marginal like the old RCA video disk format), how long will it take for 40 million (or whatever the number is) vcr's to disappear?

      Can you think of any popular recording format in the last 20 years or so (audio/video/computer) that is painfully difficult (and/or expensive) to retrieve content from. And by popular, I mean in quantities of units shipped.

    41. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're like one of those jews who helped the nazis shovel coal into the furnaces. You fucking piece of shit. You help the machine destroy our civil rights and then you say it's in our best interest. Wait until the nazis/RIAA/MPAA comes for your HDTV next and says you can't watch movies YOU RIGHTFULLY PURCHASED anymore because they've decided to switch to a new format and you'll need to update your licensing with a new fee. You are a fucking collaborater. That's what you are. PIECE OF SHIT.

    42. Re:Forcing the market change by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      I may very well do this as long as DVD players play non-MPAA burnt DVDs. Of course I'll not be able to purchase anything *new* without it being cleaned of copy restriction somehow.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    43. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the restrictions are too onerous, no one will buy the discs.

      But if they restrictions are phased in gradually over time you give the public time to adapt and accept their losses of freedom. It's a classic scenario. Give someone something and gradually take it away until they have nothing. They won't complain because they really won't notice it. We're just a bunch of mindless sheep when it comes to things like that. It's the same way stupid laws get passed in the US. Today we'll pass something to tap random phones in the interests of preventing terrorism, tomorrow we'll pass a new law to expand that in the interests of figthing the drug lords who sponsor terrorists. Finally we'll just expand the law to let any law enforcement agency tap any phone without a warrant if they suspect (or even if they just have a hunch) someone might be doing something wrong. It's a slippery slope when you start accepting restrictions.

    44. Re:Forcing the market change by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      People won't be pirating very high bit rate 1080i movies over P2P networks unless fiber to the home becomes commonplace.

      Heck, people don't usually pirate RAW ripped dvd's, they DIVX them first.

    45. Re:Forcing the market change by MojoRising · · Score: 0

      And this is circuit city's problem how?

      Robert

    46. Re:Forcing the market change by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I refuse to support people who object to the studios today because I believe they're objecting inappropriately. People like Hard_Code (the original poster) object to any sort of copy protection or prevention, on principle. They invoke "fair use" to say that it's wrong to prevent copying completely. Like I said, I think that's going too far.

      Of course I would object if somebody tried to tell me I could only watch videos on Tuesdays. But that's not what's happening. I'm afraid I don't buy your "slippery slope" argument.

      Life is all about compromise. In order to get what I want-- prerecorded movies in high definition-- I'm more than happy to give up an ability that I would never want to use anyway-- the ability to copy or digitize those movies. If I were asked to give up something that I value more, then I'd make a different choice.

      Use your imagination and come up with something that you would object to. The problem is, it will be much more difficult to stand up to them then than it is now.

      Nonsense. It'll be just as easy not to buy a "only on Tuesday" video in ten years as it is to not buy a DVD today. It's just a consumer's choice, not a revolution.

    47. Re:Forcing the market change by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Wow, I bet it feels nice to have so much money that you can subsidize the media industry's foray into HDTV.

      Yeah. It does.

      Some people don't only want to be mindless consumers.

      Um. When did this go from a discussion of the pros and cons of copy protection to an empty critique of my values?

      I like watching movies and TV. This does not make me a mindless consumer. I get such a kick out of people who vaguely criticise the various media outlets using loaded words like "culture" and "consumer." Inevitably, I've found that if one digs deep enough, one finds that even those people have a guilty pleasure or two lurking behind their oh-so-proper facades. I'll bet you spend your Saturday nights watching reruns of British sitcoms on public television, or privately enacting some other vice for which you feel indefinitely ashamed.

      In other words, "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

      Give it up, Hard_Code. As much as you might like to think you are, you're no better or worse than the rest of us. The fact that you don't like TV doesn't mean I'm a bad person because I do.

    48. Re:Forcing the market change by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      If I were a big-shot executive for a Hollywood distributor, I wouldn't be worried about peer-to-peer, or the next Napster, except in the abstract "hope that never happens" sense. I'd be worried about the rampant copying of videotapes and DVDs going on in the far East. With videos it's absolutely nuts. You can walk up to a street vendor in KL and buy a video for US$3. It looks utterly legitimate, including the box cover and tape label. Pop it in, and the video quality is just what you'd expect from a store-bought video. Excepting the circumstances, there's no reason for you to think it'd been pirated.

      The DVD situation is almost as bad. Peer-to-peer piracy is trivia compared to the kind of mass-produced bootlegging going on in Asia.

      Hollywood has been burned three times now: VHS, VCD, DVD. It's pretty clear that they won't adopt another, more sophisticated format without some pretty strong copy protection features.

    49. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should get a job that pays better than McDonald's...

    50. Re:Forcing the market change by xtremex · · Score: 2

      Vinyl always sounded better than cassettes, I don't know why. Having the original Kiss Records on vinyl is something to behold :) How much do you think Love Gun in the original PLASTIC wrapper(with the label "only $8.99!") is worth?

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    51. Re:Forcing the market change by xtremex · · Score: 2

      I just bought a combo DVD/MP3/VCD player at Circuit Shitty for $69! By Apex. Pretty good system

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    52. Re:Forcing the market change by Hallow · · Score: 1

      DVD's and CD's will inevitably degrade to being unusable as well. They have about a 200 year theoretical maxium life stored at the perfect temperature, humidity, and in complete darkness. In real world use, they will usually last less than 10 years, almost certainly less
      than 20, even with careful handling.

    53. Re:Forcing the market change by DrCode · · Score: 1

      I believe vinyl had a better dynamic range, especially at the high end. An ordinary LP can give you frequencies up to at least 20KHz, but casettes topped out at around 16-18KHz. Plus casettes had a lot of noise at the high end. Dolby helped get rid of it, but that also seemed to cut out some of the high frequencies at the same time.

    54. Re:Forcing the market change by reynolds_john · · Score: 1
      I [for one] like to purchase $20,000, flat-screen, plasma televisions, so I can make out the tip of the pimple on a fly's ass.

      Ludicrous clarity is quite an incentive for me never to be able to copy any of my store-bought products! Why if I could only have my eyes surgically altered to take advantage of the infra-red spectrum there's no telling what lucious eye-candy AOL-TIMEWARNER-DISNEY could produce for me!

      You must also own an HP Pavillion, and probably enjoy formatting and re-installing their scratch messy operating system and overwriting all your data on a bi-monthly basis....

    55. Re:Forcing the market change by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
      Note to the unwise - vinyl sales are on the up, they have been for 5 years. At least 50% of the major single releases each week are available on vinyl. 100% of dance oriented ones are. The vast majority of dance music (the biggest selling sector in europe) is ONLY available on vinyl.

      This is only because dance and hip-hop DJ's through finding a new use for the medium have created a renewed interest in a previously obsolete format. It's a simple case of the market reacting to consumer demand.

      If you really want to see a dead format, try 8-track, nobodies been able to find a decent use for it in the modern age so 8-track == dead.

    56. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww, you Europeans have sectors now? You're all grown up!

    57. Re:Forcing the market change by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      You are confused (about a great many things...). If you purchase a movie on a new VHS tape, you have a license to view just that. You can copy it for you personal, non-commercial use. You DO NOT have a license to then download a higher-quality version of the movie for free. If you want DVD-quality, the buy a DVD. However, I am sure you would be happier watching a DivX movie that you actually have a license for so you stay pure and not sell out to the man.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    58. Re:Forcing the market change by radish · · Score: 2


      OK, I only know a few (I spend plenty of time in the US, but only visit a few cities), but to save you asking:

      --> Tower Records in Las Vegas has a couple of racks of Vinyl over the far left corner as you go in, past the anime DVDs. Small selection, but I found a couple of total gems there (e.g. pristine copy of the DJ edition of Hybrid's album)

      --> Virgin Megastore, Times Square, NYC - Big ol' vinyl selection on the main floor, at the back.

      --> Virgin Megastore, Union Square, NYC - Couple of walls full, and maybe 20 feet of 3 tier shelving, over to the back right as you enter.

      --> Tower Records, San Francisco (somewhere over near Fisherman's Wharf) - huge vinyl department, easily 30% of floor space. Mainly Jazz, so not my thing, but they sure sell the black stuff :-)

      Now of course I'm not talking your Best Buys, or Circuit Citys, or (heaven forbid) Walmart, but it's out there, in the major chains, even in the US. They wouldn't sell it if there wasn't demand.

      Note - I'm not claiming vinyl sounds better than CD, that's purely subjective (although I do have a fondness for the sound). I use vinyl for mixing, and its other qualities make it unmatched for that purpose. Of course CDs outsell vinyl by miles, and they're far more suitable for every day use, but to say vinyl is "obselete" is plainly not accurate. Many of my good friends owe their (very healthy!) livings to the fact that it isn't!

      Back to the decks :-)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    59. Re:Forcing the market change by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      For less afluent people, CDs/CD players are too expensive. Which, of course, puts DVD players way out of their range. But I guess it's OK for poor people to not be able to afford entertainment, right?

      Excuse me? Did DVDs, CDs, and other forms of popular entertainment suddenly become a civil right? Hey, I can't afford to buy one of those HDTVs that you can hang on the wall. Who can I sue? I feel oppressed.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    60. Re:Forcing the market change by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      VHS tapes as well have this sort of niche that DVDs can't replace: recording shows off the air. Tivo is in many ways a superior alternative (though not in all ways, as it doesn't allow friends to share tapes), so it will probably continue to take market share away from VCRs.

      Barring a completely new and unknown format coming up, I'd guess that in 5 years or so when DVD recorders and blanks drop in price we'll start seeing TiVos and other DVR's including built in dvd recorders.

      When you want to keep a show, you'll have the ability to burn it to disc.

      Hell, most DVD players include the ability to play VCDs. a 640 meg blank cd is probably enough to burn a half hour tv show episode. You can get a CDR drive for $80 or less these days. Wouldn't be too hard for them to bundle one, or support external USB burners.

    61. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love your posts all the time because you seem to think that as consumers, we should either accept what companies sell us "...or sit the fuck down and let us consumers please buy any crap that's shovelled over the fence at us..."

      That pretty much sums it up, eh?

      Lets hear you speak, sheep...

      "Baaaaaaa"

      Good boy. Good boy.

    62. Re:Forcing the market change by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hollywood has been burned three times now: VHS, VCD, DVD. It's pretty clear that they won't adopt another, more sophisticated format without some pretty strong copy protection features.

      Wow. An entire industry has been arriving in the last twenty years that makes them happy by selling first run movies weeks after release to rental shops for up to $120 US for huge profits and you say they get burned?

      Funny, I wouldn't say even blockbuster would be saying that the movie industry is getting burned by them, quite the other way around.

      After all, we're talking about movies here for chrissakes. You know, images on a screen? I love to watch them, but honestly, its getting a little ridiculous with the prices and schemes.

      Screwed by DVD? You honestly haven't noticed that most people cannot record DVDs yet, have you?
      Matter of fact, studios encourage DVD. So what are you talking about?

      You might also notice that the people that make no real important product, and make fantastic money at it insulate themselves with lawyers.

      Here's some examples: Porn. Cigarettes. Television and movies. Drug dealers. Some Software.

      They are going to use lawyers and FUD. They love them. Get used to it.

    63. Re:Forcing the market change by mpe · · Score: 2

      The important detail is that the popularity of vinyl is easily explained in the context of dance music. This suggests that until a superior technology comes along to replace what vinyl provides (and neither cassette tapes or CDs fit this) vinyl records will continue to be sold.

      Rather it's the case that when it comes to DJing vinyl is the "superior technology". Dispite attempts to make CD players which attempt to emulate turntables.

      VHS tapes as well have this sort of niche that DVDs can't replace: recording shows off the air.

      Or recording from security cameras.

      Tivo is in many ways a superior alternative (though not in all ways, as it doesn't allow friends to share tapes), so it will probably continue to take market share away from VCRs.

      You could make such a device with removable media, it's just that such machines are in their infancy and the likes of the MPAA are trying to kill them off.

      Cost is also an issue with Tivos, something which is not the case with movies on VHS.

      20 years ago VHS tapes cost about 10 times what they do now. If hard disks were as commonplace as VHS they would be a lot cheaper too. It's a matter of economy of scale.

      There is no technical reason that DVD movies have to be more expensive that VHS movies.

      The reason is that they are priced around what people will pay, since DVD (like CD) is being pushed as a "better" product it has a higher price. Thus even more profits, since they are cheaper to produce and distribute than VHS they would still make more profit if they were priced a bit less...

      Because of the service component of Tivo, it's unlikely that Tivo could become less expensive than VCRs. Those digital TV recorders that do not depend on a central service have a better chance of eliminating VCRs, though the marketing reality may mean that they take a while to succesfully compete with Tivo.

      In terms of hardware having less moving parts could easily make a Tivo type device cheaper than a VCR, at least in volume. The problem with the service is that it's a standalone service. With the Tivo people having to provide all the dialup infrastructure, which means that it costs more than if they were simply selling access to the data over the Internet.

    64. Re:Forcing the market change by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just remember that it's not legal for you to download and use any content that isn't part of the original VHS tape you bought, like deleted scenes, director commentary, or anything else added only to the digital format; those are all covered by separate copyright.

      But try getting hold of just this material. If you already had a VHS copy you've paid twice for the movie. Also quite a lot of this material is very cheap for the publisher to add.

    65. Re:Forcing the market change by Mignon · · Score: 2
      How much do you think Love Gun in the original PLASTIC wrapper(with the label "only $8.99!") is worth?

      Why don't you check for yourself?

    66. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A similar quote can be produced for increasing car sales.

      Yeah, but it wouldn't be as funny because it wouldn't be a Disco Stu quote.

    67. Re:Forcing the market change by xtremex · · Score: 1

      $28??? A little disheartening :(
      It's worth a whole hell of alot more to me.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    68. Re:Forcing the market change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The vast majority of dance music (the biggest selling sector in europe) is ONLY available on vinyl.

      good

    69. Re:Forcing the market change by henrym · · Score: 1

      Is it kiddie day on Slashdot today? I can't believe that the previous post which was so completely devoid of any logic or rational though was modded up to insightful.

    70. Re:Forcing the market change by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      If you were to walk in to any major chain store in the US and ask where they kept the LPs, they would look at you like you were from another planet.

      Only if the clerk was new. I'm always amazed at how, more and more, major music chains are stocking vinyl. If the guy doesn't know what an LP is, he doesn't belong in a music store.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    71. Re:Forcing the market change by Artifex · · Score: 2
      But try getting hold of just this material. If you already had a VHS copy you've paid twice for the movie. Also quite a lot of this material is very cheap for the publisher to add.

      The fact that it's cheap for the publisher doesn't diminish their right to claim compensation for it. The people who work in diamond mines make a pittance, but I dare you to go to a De Beers warehouse, scoop up a handful of uncut gems, and attempt to walk out with them, using that as a reason.


      Your moral recourse is to sell or give away your old copy (if you don't want two copies) and buy the new copy, or do without the new material. Anything else is stealing.


      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  16. 8mm? by sphealey · · Score: 2
    I doubt Circuit City ever sold any flavour of Beta.
    CMIIW, but aren't 8mm vidoecams Beta? If so, Circuit City has certainly sold a bunch of those...

    sPh

    1. Re:8mm? by checkyoulater · · Score: 2, Informative

      but aren't 8mm vidoecams Beta?

      No. 8mm videocams use 8mm or Super8 or Hi8 (I think they are all the same?)

      I forget the size of the tape in the Beta format. I don't think beta cameras were ever really marketed to the end user. They are mostly used in video production, indie films and the like. The going rate for a betacam camera (not to be confused with betamax) in Canada is currently around $20,000, and probably used at that. Definately not something being sold at Circuit City.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    2. Re:8mm? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      For big fun, ask the red-ass baboons who work at Circuit city for an 8mm adapter. I bet they'll try to sell you a vhs-c adapter, thinking all "Little videotapes" are the same.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:8mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Super 8 is film, not videotape.

    4. Re:8mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8mm is to Hi8 what VHS is to S-VHS.

    5. Re:8mm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beta? Ever since Beta came out I've been waiting for the 1.0 release. It was damn good at Beta, I can't wait to see what it's really gonna be like.

    6. Re:8mm? by luismunoz · · Score: 1
      I think many people here is confusing some of the following terms



      Beta - An old and now discontinued form of helical scan tape that was intended for the comsumer market. It was discontinued in the 80's IIRC. It degraded faster than VHS and was generally less reliable, but YMMV.



      Video8 / Hi8 - Tape formats that were deveoped for the consumer market. Video8 provides slightly higher resolution/quality than standard VHS. Hi8 is a higher quality. To some (myself not included) is geared for semi-professional use. Recently it has been used for consumer-grade camcorders. It has better line-count than Video8, thus better quality.



      Super8 - An 8mm "chemical" movie tape used by traditional projectors. I don't think this is even produced in these days.



      D8 - Helical scan tape similar (in form factor) to 8mm tapes such as Video8 and Hi8. It uses digital recording techniques to improve on the line-count, producing excellent quality. It is targeted at consumer and semi-professional use. Also known as DV.



      MiniDV - Similar to D8, but uses a tape cassette with a form factor compatible with a DAT tape (4mm). Provides (roughly?) the same quality as D8 with a smaller form factor.



      MicroDV - Proprietary tape system by Sony® which stores video in MPEG-2 on a tape smaller than a MiniDV.



      Hope this helps.

    7. Re:8mm? by DevNova · · Score: 1

      Beta is/was 1/2" just like VHS. I'm not sure about the consumer Beta cameras. At the time, all that may have been available were standalone cameras that connected to record decks, so the term Beta cameras and VHS cameras didn't apply.

    8. Re:8mm? by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Beta - An old and now discontinued form of helical scan tape that was intended for the comsumer market. It was discontinued in the 80's IIRC. It degraded faster than VHS and was generally less reliable, but YMMV.

      There are still versions of Beta used today. Betacam SP is in widespread use in the Television industry. This is much better quality than Beta of the 80's. Betacam tape moves really fast through the recording heads, recording only 30 minutes on a tape. The version that was geared to the home user was betamax. I think betacam blank tapes cost about 50 bucks.

      There is also a move these days to Betacam Digital. Haven't actually seen this one in action, though.

      I have worked with Betacam SP tapes on numerous occasions, however. The quality of Betacam is excellent, for an analog format. I own DVD's which look far worse than some of the Betacam masters that I have worked with.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    9. Re:8mm? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      but aren't 8mm vidoecams Beta?

      No. 8mm videocams use 8mm or Super8 or Hi8

      Super8 is film. Hi8 is tape.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    10. Re:8mm? by luismunoz · · Score: 1

      Betacam (SP/Pro/etc) is hardly the same thing as Beta. Additionally to the tape speed, the angle of the heads has been changed and the encoding is different. Granted, it is the best analog camera you can carry for professional work but the size of the cassette along with the weight of the transport, housing, etc. makes it a pain to use it.

      However, I intended to include it in my response (but forgot to...)

      Betacam Digital is a different story. It has more than 500 lines of resolution and provides superb video quality... for a price :)

  17. WTF by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    How the hell are we supposed to record anything? Is this another MPAA/RIAA/Divx stunt? Circuit Shitty has always been lame.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
    1. Re:WTF by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Buy yourself a replaytv and you won't even have to fast-forward through commercials. Now if i could only get the fucking think to work with my satellite reciever...

    2. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems expensive to have to buy an entire unit every 40 hours... What if I want to keep what I've recorded?

    3. Re:WTF by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think you missed this bit:
      Circuit City will continue to carry blank VHS tape and VCRs, he added.

      There only appear to be getting rid of pre-recorded ones, and I say more power to them.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  18. Bound to happen by md27 · · Score: 1

    This was only a matter of time, once a critcal mass of people have DVD players, you'll be hard pressed to find VHS tapes and players anywhere. Try to buy a 5 1/4 floppy, and soon even a 3 1/2 floppy.

  19. From the same folks that brought you Divx by darnellmc · · Score: 1

    Not sure I spelled it right, but this is not the first time they've made a mistake when it came to DVDs ;o) .

    Remember when they sold DVDs with that Divx protection that did not allow you to watch them after a day or 2? With 90% of homes having a VHS and only 35% with a DVD Circuit City is making a mistake.

    Does the RIAA have stock in them?

  20. S-Mart by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 1

    Nice to see Satan Mart (big, red, and evil, it's Satan Mart) doing something of which I approve.

    It would be a smoother transition, however, if easy-to-use DVD recorders were widely available for home use. Lots of people don't want to keep two machines around. One to play their beautiful new LOTR DVD and one to record The Price is Right. PVRs are nice, but the subscription fee on the Tivos and the high price of the ReplayTVs turns me and I presume most consumers off of them.

    --
    Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
  21. HDTV, take note: by mekkab · · Score: 1

    First Blockbuster makes the announcement that they are going DVD. They're not there yet but now when you first walk into the store DVD is what you get.

    Now Circuit City is phasing out VHS... With the affordability of DVD players and its clearly superior picture quality (I liked grainy vhs, didn't see a need to get a dvd player, got a PS2 for my wedding and now I don't rent tapes.) there is no reason not to.

    Current VHS users can still rent VHS cassettes, and blank tapes will still be sold for quite a while (so you can tape your tv shows), its just getting phased out.

    This is the model HDTV should take/is going to take. Don't legislate it into existence- let the technology mature. Let it breathe along side whats already there, and watch as people take note of its superior performance. As the entry level price drops the past will fall by the way side.

    the people I feel the worst for are those who have huge vhs libraries. But since there are ways of taking obselete video formats (Super 8!) and transferring them to digital, they don't have much to worry about.

    And time marches on.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:HDTV, take note: by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      The Blockbuster point kinda has me worried. I went searching for John Water's Pecker a few weeks ago at the local BigBlueBastard and guess what format i found it in?
      The cashier was sure they had it at one time in DVD, but not anymore.

  22. GO DIVX! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh wait. nevermind.

  23. Good thing, too by SirKodiak · · Score: 1

    A VCR is the easiest way to tune cable and get output that an Audio/Video Reciever can understand. Now, I'd love to find a small box that tunes cable, supports some of the nicer tuning features (favorite channels, last channel button, etc.), and doesn't cost too much. This would let me use my VCR for what it is intended: sitting there doing nothing while I use my DVD player.

    1. Re:Good thing, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a television set. All television sets sold today will have outputs for a receiver. Besides, if you have cable you should probably also have a cable box. Most digital cable boxes will have digital coax or fiber outputs anyway. Just hook em right up to the receiver.

    2. Re:Good thing, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was TiVo reference, right?

    3. Re:Good thing, too by cwebster · · Score: 2, Informative

      call your cable company ask for one of the cable decoder boxes. Ive got a Scentific-Atlanta Explorer 2000 cable box. It has cable in and out (cable out just sends the current tuned channel out on channel 3). Its got composite and S-video out, stereo and coax digital audio out. The box itself supports the features you want (fav channels, last channel) and has an on screen guide (tv listings) if you have digital cable. I dont think i'm paying for the one i have now, but if i wanted another Time Warner quoted me ~ $3/month to rent one.

    4. Re:Good thing, too by binarybum · · Score: 1

      "All television sets sold today will have outputs for a receiver" Uh, no they don't. I've seen a number that only have mono outputs too.

      --
      ôó
    5. Re:Good thing, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoever modded that down needs a serious lesson in reading and context. It was a direct reply to the post above it........

  24. The Analog Hole by Comrade+Brightski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahh, looks like the MPAA has found a novel new way to plug the "analog hole"-- just get rid of the analog devices! What a relief. Now I can rest assured that the industry will be making the money they deserve, selling those copy-proof DVDs.

    All your VCR are belong to us!

    --
    "Software is like sex. It's better when it's free." -Linus Torvalds
  25. VHS is a dinosaur! by uncoveror · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lousy picture quality, and they will wear out. Good riddence to VHS, your grandpa's way to collect movies. I guess they are an appropriate format for the Jurassic Park flicks, though.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    1. Re:VHS is a dinosaur! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe my grandparents have any VHS, Beta, or DVDs to call their own. Let alone a VCR to watch them on. And, I'm only 20.

  26. anticompetitive by Jacer · · Score: 1

    some people shop for their tech widgets soley at circut city. if they don't have any alternative than dvd, they'll buy dvd, even if it costs *more* it's a horribly unethical tactic, and as of now it's only a speculation, but i hope it isn't so!

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:anticompetitive by ender- · · Score: 1

      Anticompetitive against whom? The VCR Manufacturers? Nope, they make DVDplayers too. The MPAA isn't going to mind going solely to DVD as it's cheaper to produce than vhs, so it helps them too.

      And if Joe Blow is too dumb to go somewhere else to get the same thing cheaper, then that's his problem. Then again, if he shops for tech widgets ONLY at Circuit City, that should tell you the same thing. :)

      What I'm hoping, is that since there will be much more shelf space for DVD's, they will be more likely to carry the less 'blockbuster' titles that are hard to find at retail stores.
      And it will also hopefully convice the movie companies to release some of the movies that haven't yet come out on DVD, such as Indiana Jones, and Back to the Future.

      Ender

      PS. On a similar note, I was rather dissapointed a few years ago when I realized that Six String Samauri was on DVD before The Princess Bride! [Not that I didn't enjoy Six String Samauri of course]

    2. Re:anticompetitive by Jacer · · Score: 1

      hey, on that note, UHF just came out on dvd, the funny thing is, all the deleted scenes were taken off of VHS tapes....they found them in "weird" al's closet, where they had been, for the last thirteen years!!!! watching it with commentary is funnier than the actual movie!

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  27. Recording... by scaramush · · Score: 1

    Huhn.

    The problem with doing away with VHS isn't, "what format will I get my pre-recorded content on", since DVD seems to win over VHS in several categories (durability, quality, etc), but rather "when I want to tape Hardware Wars, how am I going to quickly and cheaply record it"?

    Yes, there are DVD recorders available, but they're expensive. And Yes, digital recorders like Tivo and ReplayTV are available, but not widely (certainly compared to the installed base of VHSs).

    Given this is the company that tried to cram DivX (the old version, not DivX ;) Deux) down consumers throats, completely ignoring that this was NOT a convenient format for them, I suspect this has more to do with profit margins than a whole hearted embrace of new technology. VHS players are a ridiculously cheap commodity item, while DVD players are still considered (to the mass market) "new" items, and are therefore more expensive.

    --
    "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
    1. Re:Recording... by Jebus_the_spork · · Score: 0

      DVD recorders are a rather new thing in the market.

      just like dvd players in the past, the dvd recorders will go down in price with time.

      --
      I didn't think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows - Bart Simpson
  28. Circuit City's past by qurob · · Score: 1


    Aren't these the same clowns who were in on DIVX, which failed?

    I'm a former Best Buy employee, so maybe I'm biased. Personally, I just don't like shopping anywhere with salespeople who work on commission.

    1. Re:Circuit City's past by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Best Buy is so much better than Circuit City because they aren't on commission. They have no incentive to screw you. Anyone one on commission is paid to screw you, by selling you the crap they need to move, instead of what you want or need. Every commissioned saleman knows they can get away with verbal lies. If it's not in writing, It won't stand up in court, and if it is in writing, disclaim it with fine print.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    2. Re:Circuit City's past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take your Best Buy protection plan and shove it up your ass!

    3. Re:Circuit City's past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Caveat emptor"

    4. Re:Circuit City's past by headchimp · · Score: 1

      Thats why you wear a hidden mic to get them on tape. Now if only I could find a pair of those camera glasses that Howie Mandel wears on the Tonight Show.

    5. Re:Circuit City's past by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    6. Re:Circuit City's past by qurob · · Score: 1

      So you're saying you don't want to buy it?

  29. Tapes only by genka · · Score: 1, Redundant

    For those who didn't read the artile:
    Only prerecorded VHS tapes will be discontinued, not the blank ones or VCRs.

  30. Oh well, has to happen at some point... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't see what the big deal is. Tho what I do find interesting is walking into a local music store named "Record & Tape Traders" and finding no records or tapes. Blah.

    Yes VHS is on its way out. The worst problem with this is the eventual loss of films that will never be released on DVD.

    1. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by ari{Dal} · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes VHS is on its way out. The worst problem with this is the eventual loss of films that will never be released on DVD.

      You hit that one dead-on. I have a number of old videotapes that i love kicking around that will never make it. There isn't exactly a huge market in 80's teen chick flicks in the DVD genre *grins*.

      I love the dvd releases for Harry Potter, Star Trek TNG, and just about any anime for the choices and menus (cant wait to grab Neon Genesis on DVD), but most of my old favourites just weren't popular enough or are too 'passé' to be released on DVD now. While geek favourites are almost guaranteed to make the transition, movies like "Heathers" and "The Breakfast Club" probably never will.

      Showing my 80's girl upbringing bigtime here.

      --
      Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
    2. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      Like there isn't enough pr0n on DVD... ;-)

    3. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Or such classics in bad cinema like Innocent Blood. =P

      I just can't escape from either my whole 80's upbringing or my love of truely bad movies.

    4. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by woggo · · Score: 1

      Where are you located? I seem to remember a "Record and Tape Traders" outside of DC, where I grew up.

    5. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by filth+grinder · · Score: 2, Informative

      go to a place like Suncoast, or heck even Best Buy, and take a look through their DVD sections. You'd be amazed at what they are releasing out on DVD. I'm in the process of buying tons of bad 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's horror flicks. Like Corpse Grinders, 7 Doors of Death, Zombie, and other cools stuff. Heathers and the Breakfast Club are already out on DVD, those are actually pretty popular cult films. You'd actually be surprised what makes it onto DVD.

    6. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by filth+grinder · · Score: 1

      Innocent Blood is out on DVD

      As I mentioned in my response to the parent, lots of stuff that you think wouldn't be released on DVD, IS being released on DVD. I'm building a large collection of abosultely crappy horror films. It's amazing what you'll find out on dvd. Go to Suncoast, Best Buy, even Virgin, and browse around, you'll find tons of gems that you would have thought would be lost for ages.

    7. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      "Record & Tape Traders"? Is that someone from Baltimore I hear?

      BTW, snake eyes could kick your ass.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by kob43 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Myself and a small band of old school had been searching for years for a copy of this movie on VHS. Finally one guy bought a copy from some obscure website. Then the other day I was at the store and saw a 2-disc collector's edition BAD TASTE DVD!

      Yes, the old movies are coming to DVD, just wait and see.

      --


      Kiss my bass.
    9. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Man, half of me just went "Oh, cool!" and the other half said "Dear god, why?"

    10. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      I was wondering the same thing. I remember renting LP's and buying blank tapes (and rolling papers) from the original RTT on York Road.

      The one in Towson still has vinyl, although the one by JHU may not. I've never been to the Glen Burnie store.

      If you are by the Hop, try Normal's.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    11. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by gidds · · Score: 1
      The worst problem with this is the eventual loss of films that will never be released on DVD.

      Indeed. Case in point: this very minute I'm trying to track down a VHS copy of a film that was never released on DVD: Closetland. Worse than that, it was never released here in the UK at all, so I'm going to have to hope that someone I know has a VCR and a TV that'll cope with NTSC...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    12. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      While geek favourites are almost guaranteed to make the transition, movies like "Heathers" and "The Breakfast Club" probably never will.

      Are you kidding? Studios can't get movies out onto DVD fast enough. Heck, both Heathers and The Breakfast Club are already out on DVD. Chances are, if you can think of it, it will make it onto DVD. Then again, I do think I'm going to have to copy my laserdisc of Easy Wheels onto DVD if I want to see it on my DVD player.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    13. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by SETIGuy · · Score: 1
      There isn't exactly a huge market in 80's teen chick flicks in the DVD genre *grins*.

      While geek favourites are almost guaranteed to make the transition, movies like "Heathers" and "The Breakfast Club" probably never will.

      Damn, if "Heathers" is a chick flick, I must be a chick. I bought it on DVD this weekend ($9.99 at Target). I always thought of "Heathers" as "geek fantasy" rather than chick flick.

    14. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by subsolar2 · · Score: 2
      As of yet you can't get the "Back to the Future" series on DVD ... a popular movie. You can't even buy the orginal on VHS anyplace (even online) so I ended up digging it up at a used book & record store (Half Price Books).

    15. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by subsolar2 · · Score: 2
      Two others I'm waiting to come out on DVD are "Soylent Green" and "Omega Man". The only thing I can figure with the "Back to the Future" not being released is there is some odd contract issue involved. As far as the other two I have no clue other than the fact that they may not have been that popular.

    16. Re:Oh well, has to happen at some point... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Damn. Renting LP's. That takes me back.

      Yeah its the JHU shop, basically all CD. Weird.

      Normal's is cool. As is Music Exchange for vinyl (are they still around?).

      BTW, it figures the only slashdotter that happens to pick up on an obscure yet coincidental GIJoe reference is somehow connected to B-more.

  31. It's like a CD, with pictures? by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1

    In a related story, Circuit City has announced that it has created a research department to uncover what exactly a DVD is.

  32. DivX anyone? by drawlins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that VHS is out, but I would not be one to follow Circuit City in a technology trend after their all-out effort to embrace DivX. I pity anyone stuck with one. :-(

    1. Re:DivX anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they gave everyone who had a DIVX player a $100 rebate (which was approximately how much extra that feature cost).

      I think they tried to fix any mistake they made, although the actual level of mistake that they made with DIVX is hard to say.

      My parents actually liked it, and my dad (an usually bright guy) insisted on having it. For him and my mom, who rarely watch movies, dislike the hassle of returning movies (they live 15 minutes from the nearest blockbuster), and don't really care about extras or widescreen, DIVX was a way to watch movies pretty cheap (especially when they were being phased out for $.99 a piece). I think the tech segment of society was (rightfully) worried that if it became too popular, regular DVDs would be just as bad as the DIVX version, only in widescreen (maybe).

      And there were widescreen DIVX. I saw Armegeddon at the store and it said it was widescreen. This is completely contrary to everything you will hear from the anti-DIVX crowd. If someone actually watched it and it was full frame, let me know. But I get angry when someone tells me there were no widescreen DIVX, based upon something they heard from some guy who read something on a website made by someone who decided they were too l33t for DIVX.

      All that being said, I think Netflix is probably what was really needed when DVD came out, not DIVX. Basically the same no-hassle level of DIVX, and you don't even have to go to a store to pick the things up. Rock on Netflix!

  33. Woooeeee the directors cut of Orange County. by gelfling · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Wow. I can't hardly wait for the behind the scenes DVD bonus disk with 5 hours of extra material including interviews with people you never heard of and aren't too sure WTF they do. I especially like the 13 alternate endings to Road Trip. And what about that 'Making Blair Witch 4" which is 90 minutes of heavy breathing with the lens cap left on.

    All DVD will do is further collapse the movie industry so that it makes and sells the dumbdownest T&A teen gross out action explosion R&B/HipHop video tie in buy the happy meal while listening to the soundtrack that's not on the movie anyway handjob.

  34. Sure, DVDs are cheap now by IxnayOnTheIxnay · · Score: 1

    But what do you think will happen once there's no alternative? the same thing that happened to CD prices, maybe? We'll see how happy the /. community is about this in a year.

  35. Um, thats not now it works... by tgd · · Score: 3

    Who cares what the percentage of homes with DVD players is? The fact that you do is why they are making these decisions at a giant nation-wide chain, and you are reading Slashdot...

    Think about it -- the *only* figure that matters is what percentage of people who routinely buy movies have DVD players. The number of people with VCRs doesn't matter any more than the number of people who like SpongeBob SquarePants matters in a decision like this one.

    Its also a very different issue from one of, say, Blockbuster dropping VHS -- they won't, because I'd guess its a safe bet that the percentage of people who rent videos who don't have DVD players is a lot higher than the percentage of people who buy movies who don't have DVD players.

    1. Re:Um, thats not now it works... by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      As it happens the BlockBuster near my house just switched to a 50/50 split between DVD and VHS.. When I commented to the (cute) girl behind the counter on the change, I was told that within 2 years VHS will be just a small area in the back corner..

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

  36. Linux DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Never successfully gotten any Linux DVD player to work. I have, however, watched many DVDs using Windows XP. If it's that hard to set up in Linux, framerate statistics are worthless.

    1. Re:Linux DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's a nuisance. I don't know if you've tried the Ogle player yet, but I started using it *exactly* because of its ease-of-use compared to other players.

      ..just don't forget to read the README in the /usr/doc directory, it has the details about getting the libdvdcss file you'll need for viewing encrypted DVDs (that's just about all of 'em).

    2. Re:Linux DVDs by xtremex · · Score: 2

      Since I don't have a DVD player on my computer (I don't watch movies on my computer, I havea 51" flat screen for that!), a friend recently took the Linux plunge. He was running Mandrake 8.2, so I set up Ogle for him (The included XPlayer wasn't what he was looking for). I never set up a dvd player on Linux before.It worked perfectly and I set it up in abot 15 minutes. Ogle has DVD menus, which is the feature he wanted.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  37. It's not cheating until they release Trading Place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trading Places for DVD. Then I can trash my VCR.

  38. Phasing Out of Pre-Recorded VHS Tapes by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    Go to IMdB to check out the formats for latest releases. The usual drill is that VHS tapes are released to rent, but DVDs are available to own. That alone may be impetus to get the DVD version, but add in clarity, physical space, bonus scenes and features, and a good comparative price, andpeople will choose DVD over VHS if given the opportunity.

    VHS is making its way to the 8-track and reel-to-reel dustbin of obsolesence.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  39. And they're replacing it with what? by Aexia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sure, VHS will have to go eventually. and I won't exactly mourn the crap quality. But what's coming down the line?

    What's the standard affordable alternative to replace the easy recording ability of VHS?

    Before anyone says it, Tivo(and other services like it) ain't it. I can't share it with anyone else over my always-down DSL connection. No one can just hand me a disk of the Angel episode I missed last week or something.

    I'm trying to think of a technology that could replace it... maybe a box that could burn VCDs on the fly? The technology's probably at the point that you could do that affordably.

    The advantage of this is that people are already used to burning CDs, it's a widely available media, and you probably wouldn't need industry support to make the player. That means you wouldn't need to include DRM or other crap.

    1. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the point. the industry wants to move the technology to the point where the consumer CAN'T records things without paying for permission to do so.

    2. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm trying to think of a technology that could replace it... maybe a box that could burn VCDs on the fly?

      It's called the Terapin CD Video Recorder. ThinkGeek has been selling it for a long time.

    3. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Allows you to record a full 74 minute motion video with audio onto a digital CD format i.e. CD-Recordable or CD-Rewritable."

      CD-R and CD-RW aren't video formats. I want more specs on this thing, i.e. resolution, frame rate, etc.

    4. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by stubear · · Score: 2
      "No one can just hand me a disk of the Angel episode I missed last week or something."


      Correcty me if I'm wrong but isn't that the purpose of Tivo devices? You're supposed to record the show on the Tivo device and watch it at your leisure.

      Personally I would like to be able to have the service be unattached to the cable company and choose which DVR I want to use. Cable companies woudl provide their schedules in XML or some other similar foramt and let the DVRs decode the data on their own within the constraints of their own UI.
    5. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by David+Roundy · · Score: 1

      I would presume VCD, which means it's rather heavily compressed (to the point of introducing noticable artifacts).

    6. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No one can just hand me a disk of the Angel episode I missed last week or something.

      If you had a TiVo, you wouldn't have missed it. (Unless you're like me, and you hate that show).

      Besides, the owners of the the content don't want you doing that.

    7. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by earthman · · Score: 1

      Philips already makes DVD recorders. I suppose that answers your question?

    8. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
      No one can just hand me a disk of the Angel episode I missed last week or something.
      If you had a TiVo, you wouldn't have missed it.

      I unintentionally miss programs all the time, even when my PVR is setup correctly!
      That darn stuff outside called "weather" keeps on messing up my satellite signal.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    9. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It uses CD-R/CD-RW media to burn VCDs "on the fly" just like the original poster said he/she wanted. VCDs are definitely lower quality than DVDs -- but you get the same or slightly better quality versus VHS, and on media that doesn't wear out through use and takes up far less space to store. Another bonus is that you can also pop the VCD in any computer with a CD-ROM drive and watch it. Try putting that VHS tape in your office machine to watch while your boss isn't looking. ;)

    10. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by edwdig · · Score: 2

      The owners of the content don't want you recording it with a TiVo either. As far as they're concerned TiVo users are thieves because either 1) you're skipping the commercials which violates your "license agreement" to watch the show or 2) you're recording it digitally so that you can spread it to everyone.

    11. Re:And they're replacing it with what? by err+head · · Score: 1

      $449+shipping was the cheapest i could find one so far
      but the prices will only go down
      http://www.lik-sang.com/catalog/product_info .php?c ategory=124&products_id=811&PHPSESSID=6e8b41eba34c fb6afeadbceaba09b3d2

  40. i'm fine with this... by i7dude · · Score: 1

    as long as it doesnt affect circuit city's ability to provide the cutomer with the worst shopping experience possible.

    dude.

  41. No problem by ocie · · Score: 2

    If there are is really a lot of demand for titles on VHS, people will just go to another store. Conversely, if ther ewere a lot more demand, CC wouldn't be discontinuing the format.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  42. Digital VHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a new VHS-esque format slotted to come out, which supposedly looks better than DVD (at least until they do the Blue-Violet laser change).

    It's just the way to get people to buy yet another upgrade they don't need.

  43. not surprised by lingqi · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that VHS has gotten to a point where the profit margin is simply too low to support the legions of wolf-like salespersons circuit city sports. that's why they are ALWAYS asking you to buy extended warrenties too, btw.

    I mean -- I personally believe it's a pretty smart move -- nobody really *needs* VCRs anymore -- the only benefit of being able to record shows are now taken over with PVRs and the like -- besides the legal implications.

    The only think i really like about VCRs, though, is that darn the videos are cheap! i'd figure that a VHS tape is at least 3-5 times as much to manufacture as a stamped DVD -- but a movie would sell for 8 bux on VHS and then 20 on DVD (15 is considered a bargain)...

    one last thing -- back in the days you could BACKUP your harddrive to the VCR too -- it was an interesting application to say the least -- i mean compare to DLT tapes, VHS are dirt cheap -- and just program your VCR to "record" at a certain time of the day and send a bunch of files to that port at that time; automatic backup for a fraction of the cost; not sure what happened to the company, i don't think many people used it. but certainly a novel idea

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  44. Sweet! /. bug! by tgd · · Score: 2

    That was a reply to a different post...

  45. first post (delayed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i had fp but slashdot seemed to be down...i hereby assert this post as the true fp

    cherish my balls

    1. Re:first post (delayed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tosser.

  46. No replacement! by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    Yup, real soon we won't be able to tape shows off the TV.

    Yes, one could get a Tivo or the like to do one's "time-shifting", but the MPAA and other associations are already attacking the systems, and the ability to share recordings with friends is limited and may get cut off altogether.

    This is a good sign that the concept of intellectual property is reaching dangerous new highs, and should be reined in.

    1. Re:No replacement! by mrmag00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      woah there, they aren't getting rid of them first off and second they are getting rid of movie releases. you can still buy a vcr and record tv shows, and you still will be able to 10 years from now. (just like I can still use a casette player to record audio, but buy new music in CD form. Also can buy it on tape, but it'll be harder to find.)

      just because they are favoring a newer, higher quality, digital format over aging VHS in MOVIE RELEASES doesn't mean the worlds over.

  47. They always make the best decisions! by SaturnTim · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Yea, remember all the money they poured into the divx (not the compression, they expiring dvd's) format? I hardly consider them an industry barometer. In their effort to be ahead of the curve, they can make some bad decisions.

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  48. No one buys VHS by entrager · · Score: 1

    Citing figures that suggest that only 35% of consumers own DVD players, as opposed to the 90% penetration of VHS players, Charles Van Horn, president of the International Recording Media Association, suggested Circuit City is "giving up too early" on the aging VHS format. "It's leaving some profits on the table by turning over to DVD too quickly," he said.

    What he forgets to mention is that no one ever buys VHS movies. I don't know anyone that uses their VCR for anything but recording TV shows or renting movies that aren't available for rent on DVD.

    1. Re:No one buys VHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work at a blockbuster video, and people bought used tapes all the time. When we had a summer unloading sale, 2-6$ a tape, people were carrying them out by the armloads.

  49. Walmart sells them, who's Circuit City? by pdqlamb · · Score: 2

    Back when I bought my first VCR, Circuit City was the low-cost vendor for the things; you could buy on for $300-400 from CC, or go to an electronics boutique and spend $1,000 or more.

    That's changed, obviously. Walmart sells them for under $100. That's probably what has driven CC out of the business. As long as you can buy a VCR at one of these discounters, or even a grocery store or pharmacy, it just doesn't make any difference. Now when they start carrying DVD, or dropping VCRs, watch out!

  50. one problem i see by BOFslime · · Score: 1, Informative

    The one thing I see that might be a problem is movie rentals. vhs tapes do ware out, it takes a while.. and sometimes you can get a bunk tape. DVD's can't ware out, no matter how many times you watch them, but they do get scratched. scratched rather easily, 7 out of 10 dvd's I rent are scratched to the point that they skip.. and jump back or ahead. its from all rental stores too. If VHS is phased out (which it will be) I can see this to be a problem where rental stores are replacing costly dvd's (rental stores play upwords of $100 for a new release), or you just wind up having movies that skip all the time.

  51. Sale now, but rental soon? by xphase · · Score: 1

    My only problem with the DVD format(well, apart from region codes, etc.) is that they suck for rental. Every DVD I've rented has been scratched. I've had many of them just skip and crap out on me. This is the reason why I still rent VHS. I honestly think that some people rent a DVD, go home, hand it to their 3 year old kid and say have fun here's a movie.

    This may be just me, but untill I can 9 times out of 10 rent a DVD and have it play fine, I really don't want to rent them.

    --xPhase

    --
    The following sentence is TRUE. The previous sentence is FALSE.
  52. What about recordable media? by ari{Dal} · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I use and love my DVD player all the time (ST:TNG DVD collection is getting quite a workout), I still love my old VCR. Why? It was a convenient, all in one package. I could buy used VHS tapes for under $10 each at the local blockbuster, or pop in a blank cassette to record whatever program I wanted. No need for two seperate disc racks, and one less box to fiddle with in the entertainment centre.

    Agreed, the quality isn't there. The picture and sound are completely inferior to DVD, and any new movies I buy will most likely be in DVD format. But until they can give me an affordable, recordable dvd player, VHS is a viable option for those who don't want to spend that much money on movies.

    Add to that the number of videotapes i've purchased and recorded over the years, and the cost of replacing them all with DVDs, and I'll probably hang on to the old VCR for quite some time.

    Having said all that, I am definately looking forward to a time when true HDTV, DVD-Rs, and PVRs are commonplace, and I can say goodbye to analog and poor signal quality forever. Of course, they still haven't figured out how to keep the sat dish from fizzling during thunder/snowstorms.

    --
    Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
  53. Makes Sense by medcalf · · Score: 2

    Every entertainment medium is going digital, some (broadcast TV, broadcast radio, movies at the theater) more slowly than others (music, cable/satellite TV, Internet radio, movies for home use). Eventually, there will be a box available which has a radio tuner and a digital cable (or satellite) TV tuner, PVR functionality, music recording to the same internal hard drive as the movies, and a CD-R/DVD-R drive for dumping out content in a portable fashion. Heck, with the iMac, you are 75% of the way there on hardware (need the tuners) and the software wouldn't be difficult to put together.

    Anyway, my point was that with entertainment going digital, all of the analog formats will be relegated to the back shelves, if they continue to exist at all. I suspect that this will be a falling-off-the-shelf phenomenon, like how vinyl disappeared in the US in a year or two after a critical mass of the public had a CD player; rather than a gradual slipping away of the format.

    About the only thing that can hold this change back is legislation or excessive lawsuits. Seems that ??AA were ahead of the curve on the reasoning, since they are focusing on both lawsuits and legislation in their attempt to gain and maintain control of the audience.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  54. Well, I won't change by w.p.richardson · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Until there is something available that I can record anything on broadcast TV for a handful of pennies. I doubt I am alone among the mass market.

    What, exactly, constitutes "everyone you talk to nowadays"? The other folks in your cube farm? Doesn't sound like a representative sample to me. (Not a flame, just an observation).

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Well, I won't change by ph0rk · · Score: 1



      while they don't look as pretty as DVD , VCDs don't degrade like VHS tapes. I thought thinkgeek had a VCD recorder awhile back...

      --
      semantics are everything!
    2. Re:Well, I won't change by gmhowell · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Well, the lady who cleans my house wants a DVD player. Her husband is a service writer at a car dealership. Hardly Silicon Valley yuppies.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Well, I won't change by Bartab · · Score: 1

      Until there is something available that I can record anything on broadcast TV for a handful of pennies.

      You're obviously prorating your VCR's cost (plus cleanings, etc), not to mention the tapes themselves (they do wear out). So, since you already have a computer (you are posting, after all) you can pick up a capture card for $150. This will not only give you basic time shifting, but be burnable at $0.22 per cd, which holds 70-80minutes. For viewing on your TV but not permanent storage you can use a rewritable (1000 burns for just over $1)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    4. Re:Well, I won't change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably increadibly useful if everything you want to record - movies, sports games, Sienfeld marathons, etc, are 79 minutes long (the maximum length of a VCD)...

    5. Re:Well, I won't change by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always TiVo

      http://www.tivo.com

      Even with the monthly TiVo membership fee, once you add the cost of VCR cleanings, tapes, missed episodes, time required to program the device, etc. you're likely to be under the cost of a VCR in the long run.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

    6. Re:Well, I won't change by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    7. Re:Well, I won't change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You seem so sure, but you won't give any numbers.

      A sign that you're lying.

      VCR: $80
      Cleaning: Huh? Never! Nobody cleans VCRs because you don't need to.
      Monthly Fee: What?
      Missed Episodes: Only an idiot worries about "missed episodes". Its TV for chrissakes, not a dialysis machine.
      Time to Program the device: At your salary, I wouldn't sweat it.
      2 dozen blank tapes: $20
      Total: $100
      Cost/Month over 5 years: $1.40/month

      Compared to:
      Tivo: $250
      Monthly Fee: $10/month or $600
      Total $850
      Cost/Month over 5 years: $140

      HEY WHAT A GREAT FRICKIN' DEAL! A TIVO ONLY COSTS 100 TIMES WHAT A VCR COSTS! HEY, STOP THE PRESSES, I CAN'T BELIEVE THE WORLD HASN'T JUMPED ON THIS DEAL.

      You're pretty clearly a person with too much money. Give up the TiVo and give the $10/month to a charity who won't waste it like you seem prone to do. I'll bet you pay $80/month for your cell phone too, when you could get by with a wired phone and only pay $20/month. But hell, you're twenty-six; plenty of time to put away money in savings, right?

      Just kidding. Who can put a price on the convenince of TiVo?

  55. CC knows what market they want. by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    Half the article was "Is this a good decision? We don't know..." said in a couple different ways. Regardless of what you think of DVD's and Circuit City in general, here is my take:

    Circuit City is a progressive business, who pushes the status quoe (sp?). This is evident by their experiment with DivX, and getting rid of appliances, as stated they did in the article. Circuit City is after a certain type of market. By now, most people who buy electronics on a regular basis own a DVD player. I figure Circuit City makes their highest profit per visit off of customers who already own DVD players. If they don't own a DVD play, and stop shopping at CC due to this change, it was not one of their high value customers to begin with.

    DVD's are "moving" much faster than VHS these days. Not only are people buying new releases, but also replacing their old VHS tapes. This means it is to CC's best advantage to fit the broadest DVD collection possible into the store. People will go to CC since they are likley to have the DVDs they want. If a non-DVD player owner is on the brink of getting a DVD player, this may be the kick in the pants they need (cha-ching on new players!)...if it isn't, the customer will probably be on the low end of their "value" scale anyway.

    My guess is Circuit City want to be the one stop shop for the progressive electronics buyer, who isn't interested in VHS, or appliances anyway. If that is the case, which I could be wrong about, CC knows what they are doing and this is probably a good business decision.

    -Pete

  56. Price haggling.... Re:Who shops at circuit city? by Eye+of+the+Frog · · Score: 1

    I've found that when you shop at a place that works on commission, you can haggle the price a bit. Since the sales staff makes the difference anyways, it gives you a little leverage depending on how much they want the sale. You can also deal directly with the person on the floor selling it to you instead of asking for management approval for the price discount. Both my friend and I have haggled higher priced items down a bit at Circut City. But like any good negotiation, be prepared to walk away if it doesn't go your way.

    --
    "Sexy Man" is not a moderation option. -- arose
  57. Ohhhh sure.... by HowlinMad · · Score: 0

    They get rid of VHS, but atleast they are keeping 8-Tracks around!!

  58. They want to sel more DVD PLAYERS by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Circuit city would love it if NOBODY sold VHS tapes because then everyone would have to buy a DVD player.

    Confused customers looking for the VHS tape section are easily redirected to the DVD player section of Circuit City.

    I personally can not tell the difference between a digital and an analog TV's picture, and I like sturdy tapes better than easily scratched DVDs. I also already have a VCR and don't want to bay another $70 for another piece of equipment that does the same ( does less actually since you can't record DVDs )

    I also remember that the pr0n DVD that I watched on my PC would not let me watch the film until the previews at the beginning had finished playing ( with the Fast Forward button disabled too! ) If i cared to watch the film again I'd have to sit through all the previews again before being shown the freaken main menu!.

    I also remember watching The Matrix on a computer monitor and thinking that the hi-res made the film look WORSE because at that resolution the CG effects were more obvoiusly drawn in.

    Screw DVD and it's stupid software features. I just want to watch the frikken movie.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

    1. Re:They want to sel more DVD PLAYERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey assmonkey, go out an put 3,000 bucks into a 16:9 bigscreen with a progressive scan DVD player, and surround sound system. Then come back and tell me you you can't tell the difference.

    2. Re:They want to sel more DVD PLAYERS by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Actually, tapes are less resilient than DVDs in my experience. Why? Tape stretch. Lots of people poo-poo this, and I did also. It took quite a bit of watching to render it unusable. But there is a minor bit of information that degrades after 5-6 showings: the captioning. I finally stopped renting tapes for my wife unless I got them on release day. The tape stretch, heat/cold cycles, or cosmic rays disrupted the captioning while the picture and sound were fine.

      Now if only Universal Studios would caption their fucking movies properly.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  59. This is news? by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

    This isn't news. Future Shop, a huge Canadian electronics/music/movie chain (a la Best Buy, Circuit City, etc...) stopped selling VHS tapes early last year and have been carrying DVDs exclusively.

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  60. Whats wrong with VHS? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

    Don't get me wrong, I have a DVD player and rent them almost exclusivly, but I don't think VHS is dead just yet. I use my 2 VCRs very often to record TV shows so I can watch them at my leisure. You can do it with Tivo, but then I can't lend the tape out, or watch the show elsewhere. Plus a VCR is more economical for me since I have 1000 blank tapes sitting around.

    CC is just cutting the VCRs because they are cheap and they don't make a lot of money off them, Walmart and Best Buy will have them for 10 more years.

    1. Re:Whats wrong with VHS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1000? Why?

    2. Re:Whats wrong with VHS? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

      more like 30 or so. I was using 1000 as an exageration to imply that I have a lot of tapes.

    3. Re:Whats wrong with VHS? by headchimp · · Score: 1

      Think thats bad, I have over 1500 vhs tapes (of various crap, tv shows, etc) as well as almost 1000 3/4" Umatic tapes-many broadcast masters of tv shows.

  61. Daddy, what's a VHS Tape? by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1
    Just add this to the list of questions that children ask their parents.
    Right up there with:
    • What's a typewriter?
    • What's a record?
    • What's a horse and buggy?

  62. Hmmm by Wrexen · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think this is a good sign that it's time to throw out my 8-track player

  63. Phasing out a media without alternative by techstar25 · · Score: 2

    Its scary to think that VHS might be phased out before a cheap/easy alternative way to record tv shows is available. You can't record the Sopranos for your no-cable tv cheapskate parents without VHS. I assume that eventually TV DVD players will also record but even that will probably be a write-once format, so it will mean no more using the same tape to record Friends every week. You'll need a new disc every time. Anyway I think that is why they will be selling VCRs for along time. Plus, everybody's wedding is on VHS.

  64. That's funny.. by unicron · · Score: 1

    ..I thought Circuit City had been phased out as a whole already.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  65. Who the hell watches movies on computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do.

    Pioneer 116 w/unlocked region, $41.
    GeForce4 V8440, $ouch.

    Watching DVDs on a big-screen monitor? Pretty. :)

    1. Re:Who the hell watches movies on computers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do.

      VHS ones, though. No DVD-ROM here. Booktree with a VCR.

  66. Don't panic by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Funny
    They are phasing out sales of pre-recorded VHS Movies. They are not discontinuing sales of VHS decks or blank media (yet).

    Instead of VHS, CC will be carrying DIVX Movies exclusively. ;-P

    Story Moderation: -1 Inaccurate Title

  67. Boo... by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

    I don't like DVD. Copyright protection, you can't copy them (which is legal with VHS with certain restrictions, I think), you can't record stuff from TV (unless you want a really expensive burner), DRM, lawsuit-fests ... Give me analog, thank you...

  68. where do people find this stuff? by chacha · · Score: 1

    I work for Circuit City's corporate offices, and there has been NO announcement regarding a phase-out of VHS. Those of us here in Richmond are typically the first to know about things like this - I knew about the appliance phase out about a week before it was announced to the public. I'd take this whole article with a LARGE grain of salt, especially since it's entirely based on an unnamed spokesperson and a store employee.

    Oh well, it wouldn't be Slashdot without unverified stories getting submitted and finding their way to the front page. If it's on a website, it must be true.

  69. Circuit City by mongoks · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure about the Circuit City stores elsewhere but the ones around here have really poor DVD selections. Most of the VHS they carry seem to be bargain titles anyway and there probably isn't much profit in it. Clearing out the VHS section and using it to stock more DVD's makes sense. Best Buy can continue to carry VHS because they have lots of space but I'm sure they will follow suit in the near future.

    The article seemed to mention software and not hardware. I think VCR's will be around for a while and they shouldn't phase them out even though the profits on them are crap. The people who buy them are just wanting something to record TV and watch tapes that they don't have on DVD yet (Star Wars trilogy, Indiana Jones, etc.)

  70. Wal-mart DVD players by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

    They do sell them pretty cheap.

    A guy I work with got a el-cheapo DVD player for $79 the other day from Wal-mart. You get what you pay for though.

    Sean D.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
  71. Blockbuster's been doing the same, for a long time by mjhans · · Score: 2

    Really, this should come as no surprise. As previous posts pointed out, this has to do with *videos*, not the players themselves (yet).

    The Blockbusters in my town (Madison, WI) are all going DVD, reorging their displays to relegate VHS to one corner (or in some stores, do some interleaving). And they've been doing this for the past 6-8 months.

    And having grown up in Boston, everybody knows the midwest is slower to pick up on national trends. :) So if VHS is disappearing here, you know it's already gone on the coasts....

    Though I doubt VCR sales will ever die until somebody comes out with a good (i.e. Joe Sixpack) way of TiVo'ing out to CDR.

    - Matt

  72. 80's flicks on DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, there are at least two DVD releases of Heathers (including a deluxe one with a tin case) and I've had to resist the urge to buy The Breakfast Club many a time at Best Buy.

    Go to a bigger store. :) Now if I could only find "Leap of Faith" I wouldn't worry...

    1. Re:80's flicks on DVD... by ari{Dal} · · Score: 2

      Good point. I'm checking out some listings now... I don't order DVDs online much, but I should start... Found a copy of "The Dark Crystal" at Columbia House DVD which is just a thrill... and hey, if Barb Wire (one of their top selections!) can make it as a DVD, nothing will surprise me. Now I just have to find a copy of Labyrinth...

      --
      Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
    2. Re:80's flicks on DVD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen both The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth at the local Best Buy.

    3. Re:80's flicks on DVD... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      I've seen both The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth at the local Best Buy.

      Bought both at the evil Wally-World (Wal0Mart) for $15 each over the past few weeks.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  73. didn't you read the article?!?! by SpiceWare · · Score: 2
    I wonder if they'll continue to sell VCRs?

    The following line occured in a paragraph all by itself, thus making it very noticable:
    Circuit City will continue to carry blank VHS tape and VCRs, he added.
    1. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't watch much Tv, never rent videos, so I'm not up to speed. Have video rental places replaced all their VHS tapes with DVDs? Even the older and less popular titles? Wow I am out of touch.

    2. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by plover · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have phrased it: I wonder for how long they'll continue to sell VCRs?

      --
      John
    3. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. Most movies still aren't even carried on DVD unless they're popular or brand new. Hell, only a couple of years ago there were only a few dozen DVD titles. Frankly, until I can record straight to DVD I won't consider it anything but a toy for watching movies. When there are real DVD recorders I can pick up for $150-$200 at Circuit City where I can record from one DVD player to the DVD recorder directly like I can with my VCR then I'll think about getting one and declaring VHS dead. Until then, long live VHS!!!

    4. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by allism · · Score: 1

      No, you can still rent videotapes, but rental places seem to be moving more toward DVD also. Probably, I'm guessing, because the resale value is higher--when they have to dump the 100 copies of whatever stupid teen flick they purchased so that they could satisfy their "Always available for rental" policy, they can charge more for a DVD that is in good shape vs. their scratchy, twisted up VHS tape.

    5. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But are used DVD's really in good shape? I've never rented a VHS tape that is unwatchable. Granted I've never used a DVD, but I have several CD's which refuse to play at all because of stupid little scratches. Aren't DVD's the same way? Tapes are way better.

    6. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Another minor advantage is that they won't need to put up with unreround video-tapes.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      That's a big reason why rental stores are slower to switch to DVD. Tapes wear out with time and use, but they stand up better to rough treatment. DVDs crack when they're dropped in the night-drop slot and scratch easily. Also, lots of porn and older (80s and 90s) movies were never released on DVDs.

    8. Re:didn't you read the article?!?! by treat · · Score: 3, Funny
      DVDs crack when they're dropped in the night-drop slot and scratch easily.


      Since they purchased a license to the content, and not the physical media, shouldn't it be easy to get a replacement?

  74. trinkets by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    My neighboor (who is 26 or so) bought the Harry Potter DVD because it came with some medallion or something like that. This then forced her to buy a DVD player so she could watch it.

    So...if Circuit City just includes some toy from a serial box or whatever, they could make a killing in DVD and player sells :)

    1. Re:trinkets by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      You aren't far off. My first DVD purchases were made before I had a DVD player.

      In my case I had been planning to build a PC with a DVD-ROM drive (and decoder card for future expansion), and as incentive to hurry up and gather the funds I purchased Contact, as I rather liked the movie and it was not available on VHS (except as a rental -- and then not in widescreen). I later purchased The Devil's Advocate when I heard that the first-run discs were recalled due to a copyright lawsuit.

  75. That's odd... by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given the circuit city in my neighborhood the article could read. 'Neighborhood phases out circuit city'.

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
  76. Re:Blockbuster's been doing the same, for a long t by adb · · Score: 1

    You are quite mistaken about the coasts. I live in Providence, RI, and commute to Cambridge, MA. DVD is still a minority of the shelf space in all the video stores I visit. (It's certainly a much larger minority than it was even a year ago, though.)

  77. VHS phaseout? by dacarr · · Score: 1

    This statement is brought to you by Circuit City, the (former) purveyors of DIVX, which would allow you the privilege of doing the multimedia equivalent of paying $5000 for a new Honda Accord, and then paying the dealer $100 everytime you took it on the road.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  78. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck is this off-topic? Offensive, yes, but fuck if it's fucking OFF-TOPIC. It is about the same fucking topic AS THE FUCKING ARTICLE!! THIS post is off-topic because it isn't talking about VHS. The partent post IS! What in the fuck is wrong with you fucking people! Fuck you!! If you go into Borders, they don't have any fucking VHS anymore, expect for the fucking ones they want to get rid of and are selling for three fucking dollars! Fuck! Maybe if I post about the fucking shit in my fucking asshole it would be on topic, you fuckers.

  79. Well.... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1
    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  80. Rational Response to Market Forces by Artagel · · Score: 1

    How many people who own only tape players buy content instead of renting it? I suppose parents who let their kids watch the same movie 100 times a week do -- but aren't they REALLY better off with a DVD player? Or buying the overstock when Blockbuster Video or Hollywood Video sells the movies after 6 weeks or so?

    Just about everything about DVD discs are superior to VHS tapes except the installed base of players. They last longer, are easier to distribute, provide language and subtitle selection, and take less space to store.

    Corporate decision makers are afraid enough of change as it is -- this decision was more likely overdue by a year rather than happening a year too soon.

  81. RIAA by javilon · · Score: 2

    It looks like VHS is indeed dead. That means that DVD will go huge in the next couple of years, and this also means that the RIAA won't stand a chance to introduce a new video format with working copyright protection.

    And the number of broadband users keeps growing ...

    Oh well!

    --


    When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
  82. DVD's are more expensive than VHS by neoshmengi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think one of the major reasons to make the change is that there are bigger profits to be made selling DVD's. Audio CD's cost pennies to produce, yet they still sell for 10-20 bucks in the stores. DVD's will be the same way. DVD media will continue to go down and down in price but they will still be super expensive in the stores. VHS tapes already sell at low prices, so they have less of a profit margin with these.

  83. Digital PC VCR replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody is looking for the same setup, right? How does one go about setting one up? The format is obvious as being MPEG2 since this format which play on most DVD players. Capture card...Which is the best I have heard bad things about the WinTV PVR. AVI codec eats up a lot of memory in a short amount of time. Creative digital VCR captures audio at 32Hz. Can somebody break down a set up that will create a format that will display the original resolution as seen on a standard tv channel.

  84. damnit, dont' do this for two more years! by incrustwetrust · · Score: 1

    ugh. this sucks for us who have huge amounts of videos..haha... i like vhs, even if it's "out of date".... but, see.. i live in two nephews... one of them is 6, has the mental intelligence of a 3 year old and has been diagnosed with a bunch of shit(bipolar disorder, and some retardation-causing one are the big ones)... videos can take more wear and tear than cd's can in my experience.... and the other nephew is a spoiled little 9 year old.. who whenever i say to go away (because i'm trying to concentrate on something).. or just 'ignore' him while meditating... he decides he wants to break my stuff, or break something else and blame me... and he gets away with it.... cd's are a larger target for him as time has shown... i've only had two video's busted ("natural born killers" and "full metal jacket"..ugh! my favorites!).... yet over 30 cd's.... so yeah.. tapes are nice for the two more years i have to live in the same house as them... plus, i already have 600 videos....

    1. Re:damnit, dont' do this for two more years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a pretty good point. Children, disabled or not, are better demolishinists than umm... herm.. ugh...demolishinists! This was also a reason (among the many others) that Nintendo struggled to keep doing cartridge systems.

  85. Re:Blockbuster's been doing the same, for a long t by cetan · · Score: 1

    And having grown up in Boston, everybody knows the midwest is slower to pick up on national trends.

    That's very wrong. The midwest is /the/ test market for the coasts. You'll see it here first most of the time.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  86. So much better by hndrcks · · Score: 2

    "They have no incentive to screw you."

    Ah yes, that would account for people being arrested for trying to buy sale items at the advertised price. Give me the commission-based salespeople anytime.

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
  87. Well, make the choice... by HokieSeas · · Score: 1

    Honestly, when was the last time you bought a VHS tape, and what was it?
    Well, for me, was over a year ago, and was a childrens cartoon called VeggieTales. Since then, the company has begun putting its cartoons out on DVD and VHS, and going back and releasing its original episodes on DVD.

    And hopefully, the theory should also pan out, if theyre removing VHS stock to make room for DVD, that means they should expand their selection as well. Unless they are truly planning to expand their DVD shelf space, but still stock the same couple hundred of movies, which is a possiblity considering other weird things stores have done in the past.

    --
    A: You're doing it again.
    B: What's that?
    A: That talking thing....stop it.
  88. Funny... by phatStrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Although the company doesn't break out its sales of DVD, Circuit City officials said the entertainment software category--which includes music, movies and videogames--accounted for 11% of the chain's first-quarter revenue of $3.05 billion. Total revenue was up 14% in the first quarter compared to the 2001 period.

    "So your honor, you can plainly see from these numbers that peer-to-peer filesharing is good. I mean bad. Shoot." - RIAA Lawyer

  89. Who can blame them? by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 2

    With reasonable quality DVD players going for $69, who can blame them?

    The one listed above is the newer model of the one I own, and the same model my friend bought. Apex is not a huge brand here yet, but these are nice little units and play VCDs and MP3 CDs as well; a nice selling point for geeks.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
  90. tongue twister by jpaz · · Score: 1

    try to say Debbie Does Dallas DVD ten times real fast.

  91. Why reading the article is a good thing by lordaych · · Score: 1

    I thought the exact same thing when I saw the slashdot story, in a roundabout way. My question was, will they continue to sell VCRs and blank tapes? The answer was given its own paragraph in the article.

    Circuit City will continue to carry blank VHS tape and VCRs, he added.

    In other words, this particular incident has nothing to do with recording whatsoever. They're phasing out pre-recorded VHS tapes with DVDs, and that's it. Of course, in the long run one must ask what they intend to do with VHS; I'm sure that ties in with plugging the analog hole.

  92. Oxymoron by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    "Working copyright protection" is an oxymoron. It's like "sex for virginity". It doesn't mean anything. The CBPTBA is akin to legislating the value of PI to 3 even. The DMCA is like mandating that the earth is in fact flat. I'm not even sure the much ballyhooed head-implant is invincible.

  93. DoT Spell on Tapes by WellHungYungWun · · Score: 1

    I cast it, you can't stop it.

    --
    "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero."
  94. Uses by Kallahar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you use your VCR for? I use mine to time-shift TV shows. I cannot do that with a DVD player. Phasing out pre-recorded VHS tapes I can understand, DVD is far better in that case, but the VCR will have plenty of market behind it as long as it is the only affordable way to record shows.

    Travis

  95. But they don't want *recording*... by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyway, since VHS is still the primary *recording* medium of the consumer, I wonder if they'll continue to sell VCRs?

    This is an example of how "electronics super stores" are bad for the consumer. Circuit City wants to make money selling not only electronics, but also pre-recorded entertainment. They don't want you to be able to record a pay-per-view showing of a movie because that could cost them a sale. The sooner they can convince you to scrap your VCR and, if you don't have one, buy a DVD player (from them), the happier they will be.

    That's why it was better when "record stores" sold recordings and "stereo stores" sold audio and video equipment. And this is why it was better for Sony to make consumer electronics and Columbia pictures to make films. The conflict of interest is now such that Sony would happily kill off the CD and replace it with a copy-protected equivalent -- much as they are doing to push DVD as a replacement for VHS. They want VCRs to go away so that they can sell you not only the player, but also the movie when you switch to DVD.

    1. Re:But they don't want *recording*... by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up.

      Still, that said, I think that even without mergers, this drive to force consumers to replace everything they own will continue.

      Look at computers. The game market pushes the hardware market which pushes the game market - but it's not the same company doing it.

      And not to get *too* off-topic here, but I suspect that Civ III is horribly slow specifically because it's badly programmed to push the hardware market. It's really not significantly more complex a game than Civ II, and yet I can't even get to the medieval period without getting too sick of lagginess to continue. A K-6 500 with 256 megs of RAM should be enough power to run a freaking turn-based game.

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    2. Re:But they don't want *recording*... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Circuit City wants to make money selling not only electronics, but also pre-recorded entertainment. They don't want you to be able to record a pay-per-view showing of a movie because that could cost them a sale.
      Nice theory. But how do make it fit the facts, i.e. that CC are phasing out the pre-recorded VHS sales, but continuing to sell both the recorders and the blank tapes?

      What's actually going on here is that CC wants to sell you a VCR and a DVD player. If you can't use a VCR to do both jobs than you're more likely to buy a DVD.

    3. Re:But they don't want *recording*... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Nice theory. But how do make it fit the facts, i.e. that CC are phasing out the pre-recorded VHS sales, but continuing to sell both the recorders and the blank tapes?

      How do you know for a "fact" that CC is not going to phase out VHS VCRs? No pre-recorded tapes will reduce the demand for VHS decks. The inability to record from DVDs (due to Macrovsion) will turn some other people off of buying a VCR. Time-shifting with PVRs like TiVo will answer the needs of other consumers. Pretty soon the demand dries up, and Circuit City stops selling them. Seen any beta machines at Circuit City? How about 8-track tape decks? Elcassette? DCC (Digital Compact Cassette)?

      What's actually going on here is that CC wants to sell you a VCR and a DVD player. If you can't use a VCR to do both jobs than you're more likely to buy a DVD.

      I don't buy it. VCRs are low-profit, high return rate items that take a lot of shelf space. The tapes are bulky and inexpensive. That's hardly appealing to a retailer.

    4. Re:But they don't want *recording*... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called "Vertical Integration", this is a similar situation to the hollywood studio system. In the 20's, 30's and 40's the studios that made films also owned their own chain of cinema's and would only show their films in them (they controlled production, distribution and exhibition). So if you wanted to see a MGM film you had to go to an MGM cinema, this made it very difficult for independent films to get to audiences. This was all ended in the late 40's (1948 I think) when paramount were accused of having a monopoly position, this led to the paramount decrees which meant that studios were prevented from doing the distribution and exhibition side of things.

      Sony is an example of a Vertically Integrated company on a grand scale. Sony is a music publisher, a computer game company, sony also own several labels and columbia pictures to name but a few of their creative assets.

      Sony also makes the TV's, VCR's and DVD players (playstation 2) that a lot of people use to watch films. They also make the stereo's, hi fi's that people use to listen to music, they even make most of the equipment that is used to record music (and I think the digital camera's that were used to shoot episode 2 were made by sony as well).

      This total dominance of technology is the main reason why sony amongst all the other record companies hate mp3 so much. It's a distribution method that they don't own or control. Also they see mp3 as being in competition with MiniDisc which they have been pushing for the last 6 or 7 years.

      So will there be an equilvalent to the paramount decrees in regards to sony ?. I doubt it as sony is a multinational corporation which no single government (yes not even the US) has the power to control. Maybe we should boycott their products after all there are compettitors, but no one else makes those cool electronic dogs do they ?.

  96. Reason to buy by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    Since PS/2s (or XBoxes for that matter) play DVDs, I will have a good case for convincing my wife that we NEED one!

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  97. I strongly dislike Circuit City anyway. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    This has got to be the most horrible development in the entertainment industry since the death of the BetaMax. It's all about the video cassette. DVD sucks! Sing to the tune of 'Who's afraid of the big bad wolf':
    D-V-D is a piece of shit,
    a piece of shit,
    a piece of shit,
    D-V-D is a piece of shit,
    la la la la la!

    Seriously, now... I won't be caught dead in a Circuit City. They pissed me off a number of times, most notably when they lost record of a hefty payment I made, and I had to jump through a number of hoops to prove that I paid, when I could have been lounging around my house, enjoying a Negra Modelo, or fixing my Hemicuda instead. And then, when they supported DIVX--remember the pay-per-view DVD-like disc company run by a bunch of sleezy lawyers? And people bought a thing called DIVX GOLD, that was supposed to "unlock" your discs for unlimited viewing? Now that DIVX is gone, they can't view the movies they BOUGHT AND PAID FOR! DIVX was the last straw. So I don't give a damn what Circuit City does, because they SUCK and I don't support them.

  98. Retail outlets were bad anyways... by VistaBoy · · Score: 1
    I have come to hate retail outlets since my last shoe purchase. Why? Because retail stores do not know how to demagnetize their products. Now whenever I go to one of those big stores I set off the shoplifting alarm entering and leaving. I haven't been frisked yet, but I imagine that it will happen soon. It really sucks. Of course, it is interesting to find certain stores that don't set it off...


    Buy from the internet. That way THEY are the people that can steal from you. And if they do, you can find out and sue them for $$$.

  99. Thought Frys was first? by SWTP · · Score: 1

    I though Fry's was first. Hard to find a tape at the local place thats not blank.

  100. VHS rules rentals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one area where VHS is still the best is in rentals. When I first bought a DVD player I went out and rented all kinds of DVDs from blockbuster etc. and to my dismay found out that more than half of them were unwatchable due to scratches and the other half skipped occasionally. On the other hand I went out and checked out a 10 year old Sci-fi movie the other day and it played flawlessly.

  101. Article title misleading.... by nedron · · Score: 3, Informative
    The title for this article is patently misleading, as CC is phasing out the sale of pre-recorded video tapes, not the VHS format in general. They will continue to carry blank media and decks.

    It makes sense to phase out the pre-recorded VHS items since the primary pre-recorded rental/sale market is obviously tilting to DVD.

    It would make no sense to phase out VHS hardware or blank tapes since those are still (and will be for the foreseeable future) the primary means of recording material in the consumer space.

    In fact, CC has started carrying blank D-VHS tape. I don't know that they carry the decks yet, but there's always Best Buy for that.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  102. Failure of Democracy by pjrc · · Score: 2
    No thanks, I'd rather *legally* digitize my copy-unrestricted VHS tapes and burn them onto [media format of the day]

    That would be your macrovision-free tapes of wedding, baby's first steps, etc. Certainly if you purchased commercial pre-recorded VHS media with movies on them, they include the macrovision copy protection signals.

    I agree that it within your fair-use rights (in my non-lawyer opinion) to transfer the content from your old VHS tapes to new DVD discs... but if you believe your VHS tapes are without copy protection, well, you're in for a suprise.

    1. Re:Failure of Democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macrovision is easy to defeat. You can buy a device for less than $100 that will completely eliminate it. Really nifty for making backups of movies. Afterall, those VHS tapes you purchased aren't going to be any good after 10 years.. you need to copy them occassionally to make sure you'll have a copy archived!

  103. Did they forget to tell Blockbuster? by jason99si · · Score: 1

    Last time I was in Blockbuster about 2/3 of the store is still VHS (mostly older movies). I know they have made great strides toward converting to DVD, but they have a ways to go.

    Perhaps they are still renting enough tapes to justify the floor space. Or perhaps its due to the fact that what people want is only available on VHS, so thats why they rent them.

    1. Re:Did they forget to tell Blockbuster? by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      ... or the fact they cater to the low end and those are still running VHS. It's a market response. They will respond to the maker demand. It just happens that most Blockbuster customers still only run VHS in their trailers. Go to www.netflix.com. It is DVD only. Why even bother with Blockbuster and its silly "censorship"?

    2. Re:Did they forget to tell Blockbuster? by waltc · · Score: 1

      Kind of ironic that you label a recordable device as "low end" but put a playback-only device in a "high-end" position. Years ago the "laser disc" was introduced, which was very similar to current DVD in that it was a playback-only device but offered much higher playback quality than VHS at the time (although Laser Discs were as large as record albums and housed in similar jackets.) The Laser Disc was a huge flop, primarily because it could not record--which is a function I think you'll find is very important to a lot of people.

    3. Re:Did they forget to tell Blockbuster? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Laserdisc flopped because of pricing and marketing. DVD is succeeding in the same way that CD beat casette tape. People like me who had bought, in their lives, five pre-recorded VHS movies, have amassed hundreds of DVDs in the last few years, because DVDs are worth owning. And to tie this back to the article on Joel on Software, it's also selling complements. DVDs are better with hooge TVs, and sweet surround sound setups, and so on. VHS, on the other hand, is actually worse looking and sounding with the better equipment; it's flaws are magnified.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Did they forget to tell Blockbuster? by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      That is not the point. I'm NOT talking about the obsolescence of a recordable device. I am talking about the obsolescence of VHS as a distribution media for pre-recorded video. Laser Disk was a [low end] flop because of the price for both the media and the player. It is, however, still available and sought after by those who demand the best possible quality. DVD beats VHS in quality but its compression losses are unacceptable compared with Laser Disks. The low end aspect is a reference to folks who still have not "added" a DVD (as opposed to replacing a VCR). By the way, with VTRs, VHS are nothing but dinosaurs. I see no reason to have it. But that's me. I'm sure there are still uses for it for some.

  104. Costco as well by Fjord · · Score: 1

    My wife and I have noticed the change over time at our local Costco. Basically 2 years ago, the DVDs had half a table. That grew to a whole table and then to 2 tables, leaving only 1 table for VHS. I wouldn't be surprised if in another 2 years there was no VHS table at all.

    --
    -no broken link
  105. [OT] Fun with sales droids by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    Next time you're bored, go into Radio Shack or whatever and express interest in something expensive.

    Get really excited, and finally say you'll buy it. The sales droid will then start on the extended warranty script. One of the favourite lines is "Modern electrical equipment is very complicated and can go wrong..."

    When they say this, tell them that the shop next door is selling the same thing, but not such a complicated one and theirs doesn't break down. Then walk out of the shop.

    :o)

  106. VHS? Does anyone still buy that? by bcflood · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I don't think I can say I have ever purchased a VHS cassette. When I decided to buy a player for movies, DVD was starting to gain wide acceptance, though VHS was still strong. I decided to go DVD even though the cost of movies was often much more expensive than the VHS equivalent. I must say that I am quite pleased with the results. The better sound and image quality make up for the price, plus the fact that I really only buy Anime videos. which on DVD. provide many more features like multiple episodes, multiple language tracks and some other extras usually. With the price of DVD players in the $100 to $150 range anyway, if you were looking to get a new video player, why not go DVD anyway. The only downside is of course the hundreds of dollars you might have invested in a VHS movie library and the fact you can't record off of the TV with DVD. Once recordable DVD becomes mainstream (and they have a standard that is set in stone), VHS will be as foriegn to youngsters as the 8-track is to me :)

  107. thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finally.. now dumb people wont fuck up and buy me vhs even though i tell them I DONT OWN A VCR!

    my fucking mom bought me a movie i wanted for xmas, on VHS!! i cussed her out and threw the video against the wall and smashed it.. i felt bad after but damnit i HATE VHS, i refuse to watch it, if im at a friends and he pops in a really nice vhs porno, ill go home , fuck that its DVD or nothing!!

  108. Re:Compatibility by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Funny, but I recently bought a new cartridge for my old phonograph. As my phonograph is >30 years old, I wondered if it would fit.

    But it screwed in perfectly.

    So why can't I get a new motherboard for my 4-year-old AT case?

  109. The article is wrong by cwikla · · Score: 1

    This is just the pre-announcement before CC announces that they will only be supporting the next step in video evolution: ViHX, a new, pay-per-view version of VHS geared specifically to consumers who don't want the burden of returning video tapes. The tapes will be smaller than normal VHS tapes, as CC will be introducing P&S squared, or Pan in Scan in Pan in Scan, where all the annoying extra scenery is removed, leaving only the direct center of the screen. Average viewers have noted that "the image looks bigger" when played on entry-level tv's.

    A CC spokesman was quoted as saying,

    "This is a large step forward for us, and for the movie industry in general. We have spent years creating a technology that degrades in performance over time, satisfying both the first time viewer and the [movie] industry, alleviating concerns of piracy, while giving the consumer the biggest image possible.

  110. I hate to break it to you... by Convergence · · Score: 2

    But, any such control scheme, unless it gets embedded into every digital device sold (SSSCA) to plug the so-called 'analog hole' (which in this case should be called the plaintext digital hole), it *will* be breakable... Once the movie is plaintext, its all over. Thus, by the statement you gave, they'll never release 1080i movies, EVER, unless the SSSCA becomes law.

    And even after such draconian *CONTROL* measures are embedded into every digital device sold.. Will they still sell 1080i, or will they just sell VCR-quality video at twice the price, and with arbitrary controls of their choosing.

    For example, look at Adobe ebooks... ``This book cannot be read aloud'' WHAT THE FUCK? Or at CSS on DVD's, WHAT THE FUCK does region encoding have to do with copyright protection.. Thats the problem, it has nothing to do with 'protection'. Its just trying to grab control over each digital device.

    You may feel that 1984 is worth it, if you can get your 1080i movies... But not everyone feels the same.

    1. Re:I hate to break it to you... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Thus, by the statement you gave, they'll never release 1080i movies, EVER, unless the SSSCA becomes law.

      You are underinformed. You can buy a few movies on high-definition D-VHS right now. Terminator 2 costs about US$22 at bestprices.com, but it's out of stock.

      This is my point. JVC put together a copy protection scheme for D-VHS called D-Theater. They presented it to some movie distributors, and those distributors agreed to release their films in 1080i on the D-VHS format. (Support for D-Theater has not been universal, of course.)

      Before D-Theater, there were no pre-recorded high-definition movies. They just didn't exist. Not because of technology-- squeezing 40 GB onto a data tape isn't hard at all. Because of business choices on the part of the distributors.

      When a bad format-- or a good format with bad features or side-effects-- comes along, it fails. DiVX failed because people weren't buying the players or the discs. Region coding for DVDs seems to be failing; a good friend of mine lives in Australia, and he says that practically every major vendor sells region-free DVD players there, which makes the whole region-coding system somewhat meaningless.

      But the simple fact that a system includes copy protection is not, in my not-very-humble opinion, a good reason for that system to fail. I disagree with your assertion that copy protection is an insidious plot. It's not like we're talking about chlorine in the water, here.

    2. Re:I hate to break it to you... by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      I hope none of your D-VHS movies ever gets dropped on a magnet or into a bucket of water or some other type of disaster. Since you weren't allowed to make a backup because the media industry deamed you a pirate before you even bought the media (that's really what they're doing) you weren't able to make a copy to use that instead. I'm always freaking out about possibly scratching my DVDs cause I know I'll have to go out and buy another copy, especially my box sets. CDs on the other hand I don't worry about since I make a copy of them all. Scratch a copy, oh well, go burn another one.

      Anyway, you must have to much money if you're able to afford a $2000 VCR just to watch your D-VHS tapes that have no random access like a DVD.

    3. Re:I hate to break it to you... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I hope none of your D-VHS movies ever gets dropped on a magnet or into a bucket of water or some other type of disaster.

      Yeah, that'd be bad all right. But I have a sophisticated system for preventing such events. I call it "being careful."

      Since you weren't allowed to make a backup...

      This is a simple either-or proposition. Either you can have a near-master-quality movie that you cannot copy, or you cannot have a near-master-quality movie at all. I am quite happy with the first option. The wear and tear on a VHS tape through normal operation is somewhat less than you might think, so I'm comfortable with the lifespan of the media. And see above for my opinion on disaster. So the "you can't make a copy" thing really doesn't ring true for me.

      Anyway, you must have to much money if you're able to afford a $2000 VCR just to watch your D-VHS tapes that have no random access like a DVD.

      Random access brings nothing to the movie-watching experience, in my opinion. Sit down, dim the lights, open the curtain, and roll the film. When it's over, put it back on the shelf and go on about your business. I don't find myself skipping around.

      I think you'll find that a lot of home theater enthusiasts like myself care more about the quality of the viewing experience than about extra features or random access. There's no random access on a 35 mm roll, after all.

    4. Re:I hate to break it to you... by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1

      This is a simple either-or proposition. Either you can have a near-master-quality movie that you cannot copy, or you cannot have a near-master-quality movie at all.

      No, this is what Hollywood wants you to think. Do you really think Joe Schmoe off the street would buy a near-master-quality copy from the kid down the street with the broadband connection? Hell no. Why you ask? What does he do if it doesn't play in his player? Bug the kid to fix it? Yeah, that'll work. Whereas if he buys it at Best Buy he can take it back, tell them it doesn't work in his player, and probably get it exchanged. If it still doesn't work and he can prove it (bring his player to the store), they'll probably give him store credit. It's a simple matter of control. They have it and they don't want to give you any.

      Whenever I mention to people about all the movies you can find on the Internet and they ask how to get them and I start to explain it, you can tell they don't want to go through that kind of trouble.

      The above poster was correct. You may be happy living with the current limitations, but will you be happy when Hollywood decides that you can only watch that movie when they want to let you watch it? I doubt you will be.

      The wear and tear on a VHS tape through normal operation is somewhat less than you might think, so I'm comfortable with the lifespan of the media.

      Actually, it's not less then I might think because I've seen it first hand. I don't watch my VHS tapes anymore cause they simply look like crap compared to my DVDs that don't degrade. Quite simply, my copies of Star Wars on VHS are starting to look quite grainy (sp?), while my copy of The Matrix that I've watched at least 20 times still looks superb.

      Random access brings nothing to the movie-watching experience, in my opinion. Sit down, dim the lights, open the curtain, and roll the film. When it's over, put it back on the shelf and go on about your business. I don't find myself skipping around.

      Then you're one of the few. I know myself personally (and a lot of home theater enthusiasts), might want to watch just this one scene that looks really good or they just want to show it to their friends. Scene selection is a gift from heaven in these situations. No need to fast forward in order to find it, just skip right to it.

      I think you'll find that a lot of home theater enthusiasts like myself care more about the quality of the viewing experience than about extra features or random access. There's no random access on a 35 mm roll, after all.

      Actually, from what I understand, it's the other way around. Most home theater enthusiasts want the extra features (scene selection, trailers, directors commentary), while the rest of the buying public just wants to watch the movie. And for the record, a lot of the home theater enthusiasts that I know have been switching to digital cameras because they (a) allow you to see your results instantly, (b) allow you to erase those results if you don't like them, and (c) you don't have to buy film ever again.

    5. Re:I hate to break it to you... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      First of all, I really don't understand why you're talking about broadband, and downloading movies off the Internet. This is not a significant problem for movies, and never has been. (It may be in the future, but we're a long way from that point, as you yourself have said.)

      What is a significant problem is the counterfeit videotapes and DVDs being sold in vast quantities in Asia and (to a lesser extent) elsewhere. Hollywood wants to prevent widespread piracy. To do this, they're looking for copy-protected data media. The fact that this prevents you from making a backup copy-- which is a dubious "right" in my opinion, anyway-- is an unimportant side-effect.

      Your repeated assertion that "it's about control" is simply unfounded. It's not about control. It's about getting paid. Hollywood wants to get paid every time somebody watches a movie. That didn't go over so well-- see Divx-- so they're happy getting paid every time somebody buys a movie. So they're trying to make it hard for people to copy movies. That's it. Please remove your tin-foil hat.

      You may be happy living with the current limitations, but will you be happy when Hollywood decides that you can only watch that movie when they want to let you watch it?

      Let me get this straight. When a company like Microsoft uses FUD in their marketing, you call "bullshit" on them immediately. But it's okay for you to use that same technique yourself? That's just wrong.

      Furthermore, I'll repeat what I've said before. If Hollywood were trying to restrict me in a way that I was not comfortable with, I would oppose it. I'd avoid their products, or whatever happened to be appropriate. But that's not what's happening.

      People who moan about Hollywood's desire for copy protection on sheer principle alone-- often invoking the same slippery-slope argument you used here-- are overreacting.

  111. Paying twice for the same thing... by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

    Here is a question. Could a case be made that if you already have a collection of [prerecorded] VHS tapes (or Laser Disks for that matter) you should be able to "update" these to DVDs (or whatever comes later) for just the media fee? You already paid for the license to see the movie. I guess this is the same as going from LP to CDs. What makes up the price of a movie? I assume the production of the media and the media cost is just a fraction of the final amount paid. The rest is license fees and general FAT. Why do we have to pay for it all over again? Individually we are nothing against this industry. Wouldn't this be a case for a class action law suit?

    1. Re:Paying twice for the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be realistic. With that logic, you should also be able to get a new copy if yours was damaged, lost, stolen, crucified, sodomized, etc. Just spend the god damn $20.

    2. Re:Paying twice for the same thing... by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      Unlike you, I don't have the habit of inserting such items up my rectum. Yes, if it was the case for one or two units, just paying the $20 or so would not be an issue. I'm talking about over 1,000 laser disks and even greater amounts of varied [obsolete] media. Think before posting. That is, if that isn't going to cause any major damage due to the strain it may cause you.

    3. Re:Paying twice for the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what kind of fucking loser must you be to have spent the money on "the license to see the movie" for more than 1,000 laser discs alone? Now let's just assume that you spent an average of 15 dollars on each movie, you're telling me that you've spent more than $15,000 on movies? It sounds to me like you have more money than you know what to do with. Either that or you're pulling these items out of your rectum...

  112. No reasonable way? by ColGraff · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I guess video capture cards, like the ATI TV Wonder series, are all useless. Silly me.

    Seriously, spend $50 on a tv wonder VE, connect your VCR to that, you're in business. Perfectly reasonable.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:No reasonable way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC posts the same thing, gets nothing. You post, get Informative. Redundant? Nah. This guy's a genius. The only one that could've possibly thought of hooking up a VCR. Give this man a trophy.

      Them's the breaks.

  113. Sounds like Garbage to me...a Joke? by waltc · · Score: 1

    The tapes will be smaller than normal VHS tapes, as CC will be introducing P&S squared, or Pan in Scan in Pan in Scan, where all the annoying extra scenery is removed, leaving only the direct center of the screen. Average viewers have noted that "the image looks bigger" when played on entry-level tv's.

    What on earth are you talking about?...:)

    "Annoying extra scenery"....???? Good grief, are you saying they'll be cropping the image on the sides and the top/bottom to exclude the visual information in the original? That's horrible, if that's what you're saying.

    And who on earth wants "performance that degrades over time"...?

    Don't tell me, you're kidding!...:)

  114. Not interested in DVD at the moment... by waltc · · Score: 1

    I'll buy DVD when it becomes both recordable, reliable, and relatively inexpensive. Basically, I don't buy my media. I rent it, or I watch it directly from satellite or digital cable. But I don't buy it, period. My local video store, indeed all of the local video stores in my area, are 5% DVD and 95% VHS. I have a couple of SVHS, Hi-Fi, Hi-Quality VCRs which I bought a couple of years ago at Best Buys for the unbelievably low price of $130 each. Playback and sound quality is excellent. Mainly, it's my opinion that DVD won't really catch on until the units become recordable and can essentially match the function of current VCR technology--which, because they are not recording devices, the current crop of DVD playback machines does not match. It's nice to be able to record on reusable media. I honestly thought DVD would have reached that point by now, but suffice it to say that if CC really intends to drop VHS/SVHS machines, the company ownership is exceedingly stupid...:) DVD makes a better playback platform, no question. But it's nowhere near as functional as it can't yet record on cheap, reusable media.

    1. Re:Not interested in DVD at the moment... by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the article you would know that we are not talking about dropping the hardware. The article is about dropping VHS as a video distribution media. Your logic makes no sense given that you do not need to "replace" your old VCR. You would just pay $99 for a DVD player in order to watch movies you rent.

  115. Moderators: you have been trolled by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

    Always wise to check out a poster's history before you blindly moderate. Then breathe deeply twice, re-read the bit about better framerates, give it the chuckle it deserves, and moderate properly.

    This is either +1 funny or -1 troll, but definitely not a +1 interesting...

    --
    four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  116. But what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, the article DOES state that this is only the phase out of pre-recorded VHS videos, but of course that is the first step in total destruction of the VHS medium. The real problem is the vast amounts of movies that, despite any effort, can NEVER all be converted to DVD. If you've ever walked into a non-mainstrem video store, you know what I mean. There are just too many VHS videos. So once the VHS format is dumped, these videos will be either lost forever, or retained only by the movie super nerds that only come out of thier holes to work at a dead end job that lets them track down now rare VHS videos.
    And one more thing, who the fuck actually LISTENS to music on vinyl? It may be handy for DJs, but come on.

  117. Phasing out VHS by seinethinker · · Score: 1

    I am excited by the phase out of VHS. I enjoy my DVD player immensely.

    I think it is only natural for Circuit City to phase it out. I know it isn't doing much business for them. DVD is starting to build momentum especially when DVD players have lowered in price. This is encouraging consumers to tap into the DVD market.

    It is important also to the Industry for DVD to catch consumer interest because they are trying to lay the ground for DVD Audio and DVD Recording.

    VHS will hang around simply for the fact that it is the cheapest means to record. DVD Recorders are not going to fall into a feasibly range for consumers until 2-3 years from now.

    I forsee Circuit City really playing up Home Audio in the next year or so. Its going to be where the money is at.

    The consumer is going to want their own Home Theater more than ever. Along with that Home Theater, they are going to want a nice TV. They are banking on these things. It's their bread and butter.

    Also, I see a lot of people taking the time to invest in dissing Circuit City. Circuit City has lots of good ideas. They are just not always implemented properly. This can be said for the majority of companies out there. I'd like you to show the perfect company with a pristine record.

    Anyways, companies do good. Check out Upromise. A good program for those wanting to save money to send their kids to college. Circuit is just one of the many investigating in this neat idea.

    https://secure2.upromise.com/app/partners/others /c ircuitCityCoBr.html?ax=circuitcitycobrand

    or go to the official site:

    http://www.upromise.com

    --
    Truth like surgery, may hurt, but it cures. - Han Suyin, Chinese Physician and Writer
  118. Hollywood Video and Blockbuster next? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I think Circuit City's announcement to phase out VHS movie sales at their stores could be a harbinger of things to come.

    I would be not be surprised that within 18 months both Blockbuster and Hollywood Video will announce the phaseout of VHS-format video rentals for new movie releases. The reason is simple: because DVD's are way more durable than VHS tapes, DVD movies can be on the rental market for much, much longer than VHS titles, which means potentially more revenue for Blockbuster and Hollywood Video.

    1. Re:Hollywood Video and Blockbuster next? by nigelo · · Score: 1

      More durable? I've rented 'ancient' VHS titles at video stores, and rarely been unable to view them, yet have returned several DVDs due to relatively minor imperfections that prevented me from playing them.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
  119. like this hasn't happened by ktdiddd · · Score: 1

    In 1958 or so I walked into a record store right after a super salesman had convinced the owner that Mono recordings were finished, done with. I bout 20 or so classic toscanni records for 50 cents each. Guess its time to stock up on VHS stuff...

  120. Future Shop did this years ago by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

    At Future Shop in Canada (or at least, every one I've been in for years), it's the same. They sell CDs, they sell DVDs, they sell blanks and burners for both, devices that will record VHS, ones that will do casettes, but prerecorded magnetic media is all gone.

    I actually hadn't thought twice about it. VHS tapes are better by leaps in (almost) all respects. in my job, I like them because when we get a shipment in, it weighs less for more DVDs, they take up less shelf space, and we can fit the overstock away easier. No way could we have fit 70 copies of Harry Potter in our counter, but DVD wasn't a problem. Easier for retailers (Superstore), cheap (the Harry Potter DVD was $19.98 for the two-disc set, which is only a dollar or two more than our VHS titles, if not actually cheaper.

    And considering the fact that you can buy a cheap DVD player for $100 CDN plus tax, there's less and less reason not to get one. Sure, it won't be top-of-the-line, but it'll be a fair sight better than VHS. All we need now are PVRs with DVD+/-RW burners (years away unless you have big cash) and all will be wonderful. You could even have a disc that would play in your DVD drive, complete with menus and subtitles (converted closed captioning) or something. Hmm...

    --Dan

  121. "Been burned"?? by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    Hollywood has been burned three times now: VHS, VCD, DVD. It's pretty clear that they won't adopt another, more sophisticated format without some pretty strong copy protection features.

    How have they been burned??

    Hollywood is making a lot, possibly even the majority (haven't seen numbers in a while) of their money out of those formats.

    I wish I could get burned like that.

    1. Re:"Been burned"?? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      How have they been burned??

      Through theft, of course. When you release something for sale only to have it widely stolen by pirates on large and small scales, I call that getting burned.

      You seem to be saying that the fact that Hollywood has made money somehow invalidates the fact that they've also lost potential revenue through piracy. I don't buy that argument.

    2. Re:"Been burned"?? by Gorimek · · Score: 2

      You're not looking at the Big Picture.

      When you release something for sale, and make a ton of money on it, I don't call that being burned.

      More importantly, regardless of what you call it, your original claim was that since the experience from VCR, DVD etc was so bad, Hollywood would not get into the HDTV market unless copying was somehow finally prevented.

      My actual argument is that they did in fact make a ton of money on them, and would most likely do the same in HDTV media. So if they refuse to get in it, they are refusing to make money.

      I'm making a purely practical argument, saying that business will probably do what makes them money. I'm not getting into moral issues at all.

    3. Re:"Been burned"?? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I think both sides of this point are valid. On the one hand, if the distributors release their movies in HDTV format X, they could potentially make $N,000,000,000. But some fraction of that potential revenue is going to be lost to piracy, leaving them with $M,000,000,000. If they don't release format X, they won't get $M,000,000,000. You have a good point, there.

      But on the other hand, we have the fact that Hollywood did not release any movies in HD format despite the existence of at least a few media types until JVC came up with D-Theater. That's pretty strong empirical evidence.

      Again, we're back to an either-or proposition. I'm enthusiastically supporting strong copy protection in whatever new HD format comes along. The potential misuses of copying far outweigh any potential legitimate uses of copying, so I'm comfortable with that compromise.

      We're basically back to the automatic weapon argument again. Automatic weapons are, technically, covered by the 2nd amendment. They're illegal anyway, because their potential for abuse outweighs the loss of liberty attached to the banning of them.

      A society of pure liberty would be an anarchy. We all voluntarily give up some of our liberties to ensure the greater security and prosperity of all. Knowing exactly how much liberty is too much to sacrifice is a tricky thing. But I've made up my mind on this particular issue.

  122. Next? by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Before you know it, the bastards will quit stocking phonograph needles.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  123. Good. by eatenn · · Score: 1
    God damn morons won't embrace new technology unless we force it on them!

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
  124. Wow, what insight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I like owning and watching high-quality movies"

    Yes, nothing better than watching "Pearl Harbor" in really high res.

    How does it feel to be an ultimate consumer?

    If they shoveled shit over the fence and called it "HDTV", a lot of people (not you, you're too smart for that) would say "thank you very much".

    As for me, I'm sitting here at home with pool, my BMWs laughing at people like you who piss away money giving it to movie studios like a crack addict in need of a few rocks.

    And before you ask, you'll buy my BMW with its 3 years old paying me about what I pay for it. And you'll buy my house from me paying twice what I did for it, so I actually know how to spend my money.

    It ain't pissing it away on the video format of the week.

    Sucker.

  125. You realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy would give up everything so he can watch "Pearl Harbor" and the TV series "Friends" in HDTV.

    My god, Jefferson would probably bitch slap him like a little girl if he was alive today.

  126. Tivo is really queer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The concept that I would pay money to tape "buffy the vampire" somethingorother.

    You people are seriously weird to get so excited by broadcast TV.

  127. What do we have here? by EaTiN+cOfFeE+bEaNs · · Score: 1

    It looks like we have more proof that digital is killing the analog star (or at least beating it into submission).

    --
    No TiVo and no caffeine make me something something...
  128. Re:Blockbuster's been doing the same, for a long t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work as a programmer for a contractor to Blockbuster Video. For DVD they rent, they rent almost 40 VHS tapes. In half of the stores, DVD already has 1/3 or greater of the floorspace. It was a huge mistake to switch more than a small portion of the floorspace to DVD's, and they're now paying for it.

  129. +1 Baby Jesus loves you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My prayers have been answered.

  130. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Circuit City is after a certain type of market"

    Yeah, its the 18-30 year old male minority market who isn't smart enough to comparison shop and who doesn't make enough money to afford a house so they don't need appliances, but will spend stupid amounts of money on a car stereo for their riced-up 1994 Honda Civic and go into $10K of debt for a surround sound movie system for their appartment.

    We white people call these kids S-U-C-K-E-R-S.

  131. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Just spend the god damn $20."

    That's a good little lamb.

    Lets hear you speak like a big sheep!

    "BAAAAAAH. BAAAAAAAH."

    That's a good boy.

    You don't mind if I shear you of all your money; after all that's all you're good for!

    "BAAAAAH. BAAAAAAAAH".

    I didn't think so.

  132. He doesn't need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey assmonkey, go out an put 3,000 bucks into a 16:9 bigscreen with a progressive scan DVD player, and surround sound system"

    He doesn't need to... he wasn't a sucker and saved his money. He didn't piss it away on a video format that will be obsolete in 3 years.

    But you're a good little sheep.

    Lets hear you speak!

    "Baaah. BAAAAH"

    Good boy.

    1. Re:He doesn't need to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't need to... he wasn't a sucker and saved his money. He didn't piss it away on a video format that will be obsolete in 3 years.

      Save? Oh yeah, I forgot that some people need to save for things. My bad.

      Now as for that sheep comment, boy I could buy and sell you. You had best remember that it's people like me that keep people like you in work. Hell, I've lost more money in a single day, and not missed it, than you make in a whole year.

      Sheep my ass, know your place

  133. The market is whatever you want it to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let anyone tell you what your tastes should be. I listen mainly to vinyl because it sounds more like the real thing, more like music, with richer harmonics and more realistic decay of notes. Last year I put my money where my mouth is and bought a Rockport Sirius turntable (used, but still a ton of money) and have never been happier.

  134. they are phasing out TAPES and NOT decks! by jark · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Circuit City Stores has begun to "phase out" VHS movies in its 622 stores around the country, becoming the first national mass merchant to go public with a specific intent to stop selling movie titles in the aging format.

    Circuit City will continue to carry blank VHS tape and VCRs, he added.
    There is nothing evil or dastardly going on here. They are merely phasing out premade VHS movies. That should not be a surprise to anyone.

    1. Re:they are phasing out TAPES and NOT decks! by wessman · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think this is a very wise move and hopefully other chains will follow suit. VHS needs to be phased out. Then again, audio cassettes were never completely phased out, so who knows what will happen.

  135. OR maybe... by Lee+the+DJ · · Score: 1

    Maybe, just maybe, the reason they're getting rid of pre-recorded VHS at Circuit City and eventually other stores is

    1) VHS looks like poo-poo for movies,
    2) DVD looks great, is easier to handle, has random access, extras, etc., and
    3) most people are too stupid to program their VCRs so losing recording capability is no biggie for Ma and Pa Kettle.

    Oh sure, YOU know how to program your VCR, but seriously, most folks are just good ol' fashioned DUMB. The few folks that figure out time shifting of their soaps will be serviced by the blank tapes and remaining VCRs. Oh and DVD players are damn near sold in vending machines now for $79. VHS tapes use more resources and are more expensive to produce than DVDs. Blah blah blah. In the immortal words of Frankenstein "VHS movies, BAD!"

    Time for me to go call around town and confuse store clerks by asking for *SUPER*-VHS tapes to record Bernie Mac.

    Also, will someone please make me a device to convert high-def component analog signal to Firewire digital so I can record any high def programming I see? (There are no analog-in hi-def recorders currently available.) Maybe a PC could be made to do it. Someone needs to make this while external hi-def receivers still have analog outputs. Just a tangent thought to play with.

    1. Re:OR maybe... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      1) VHS looks like poo-poo for movies

      Most people don't notice or care. I've gone to people's houses and seen TV "pictures" one notch removed from snow and they are perfectly happy.

      2) DVD looks great, is easier to handle, has random access, extras, etc.

      No argument there.

      3) most people are too stupid to program their VCRs so losing recording capability is no biggie for Ma and Pa Kettle.

      Here I must disagree. While that might have been an issue in ancient times, most modern VCRs have on-screen menus so simple that an old person can program them. It's not like the bad old days when programming the VCR meant opening up a little door on the top and manipulating a myriad of tiny buttons while LEDs blinked.

      I still believe that Circuit City has a vested interest in seeing VCRs go away. They don't want you to be able to record movies off of cable/satellite on a $5 tape. They want you to come into the store and pay them $20 or so for the same movie pre-recorded on a DVD that cost under a buck to press.

  136. 5-6 showings are plenty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay on average less than $10 US for VHS movies unused. (No I don't go scrounging the bargain bins at Circuit City.) If a movie lasts for five viewings, it's still cheaper than renting it, and convenient to have on hand.

    Sometimes I consider switching to DVD, but with stuff like forced previews, region encoding and uncertain image quality, no thanks. I'll wait for something better.

  137. Re:damn by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 1

    you damn trolls who have too much time on your hands to be any use to anyone all need to die...

    or worse,

    GET OFF SLASHDOT!!!

    --
    Erutangis ym si siht.
  138. Maybe they just didn't make enough profit$? by Mudcathi · · Score: 1
    There are a lot of comments regarding "evil" hidden corporate motives, but perhaps Circuit City execs are telling the truth: they make more money selling movies in DVD format than VHS format, & want to make room to stock the more "profitable" inventory.

    Consider that the article indicates that CC grossed $3 billion in the last reported quarter. They're succeeding in a highly competitive business - like any business, want to protect market share *&* profitability. Walmart has slews of VHS tapes, at discount rates - perhaps CC has learned from K-Mart's folly, in attempting to compete with Wally's World on W's strength - low, low prices. The CC execs are saying "screw that, let's be the Neiman Marcus of A/V retail!" If so, their prices certainly show that mentality.

    Then again, who knows? Maybe the conspiracy theorists are right on, & the A/V division of the Secret Order of CFRCIAFBIKGBBuild-a-Burger Brotherhood is making their move... if so, they can take my VHS tapes when they pry them from my cold, dead fingers :P

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  139. so? by corian · · Score: 1

    Circuit City is becoming the first of the mass merchants to state its intent to discontinue sales of the aging video format.

    Oooh, intent. They've also stated that they "strive to offer low, competitive prices, high service standards, and a wide selection of products to meet all consumer needs."

    Have you ever found a Circuit City with low prices, wide production slection, and a high standard of service?

  140. I give up! Why doesn't anyone understand economics by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 2

    I give up.. to all the posters below, you missde my point entirely.

    I guess I'll have to dumb-down my comment from now on. Or maybe I'll just not, and let people show how little they know.

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
  141. Let's get a few things straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, for the people that think the are getting rid of VCRs, they are not. CC is just getting rid of the movies on VHS. I work at one in Calif., in the music/movie dept., starting 4 or 5 months back we would only sell 1 or 2 videos a day. No suprise we would decide to get rid of them. thats wasted space. For those who think CC needs to lower the price on dvd movies/players. Currently we have a dvd players starting at 69.99. As for the movies we usually sell them $5 dollers less than say Suncoast. Most of the time new releases are sold under cost. We don't make much money on the dvd software. I'm glad we are dedecating more space for something that people really want.

  142. Makes sense. by Viper118 · · Score: 1

    It's about time. I always get a kick out of people who insist DVD's will fade out like Laserdiscs dis.

  143. Re:VHS? Does anyone still buy that? by countingjoes · · Score: 1

    hey renters, try out netflix.com. far better than a rental store. 20 bucks a month, sent through the mail, no extra shipping costs, 3 movies at a time, unlimited rentals a month, no due dates, over 10,000 titles. simple, simple, simple.