Slashdot Mirror


Godzilla Getting Ready to Stomp Mozilla?

mrBlond writes: "Doing the rounds: Seems like Toho [jp], 'the owner of all rights in and to the trademark and service mark GODZILLA [jp] and the GODZILLA characters,' is coming down on Davezilla for use of 'zilla' in his domain name and his dragon logo, to set a precedent before attacking Mozilla."

747 comments

  1. so what? by endoboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    mothra will protect us

    1. Re:so what? by DrNibbler · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mothra... that's a Bugzilla, right?

      --
      Sean.OutaHere()
    2. Re:so what? by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 5, Funny

      Look, all they have to do is change the name to Mojira. Problem solved.

      Or not.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    3. Re:so what? by mpe · · Score: 2

      mothra will protect us.

      "Mothra" describes that the chracter is based on a moth. Is the name "Godzilla" entirely made up or does it actually mean something.
      Anyway isn't there a time limit of claiming trademark infringment?

    4. Re:so what? by endoboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Anyway isn't there a time limit of claiming trademark infringment?" Nope--trademarks live forever, as long as the holder prevents them from falling into common usage...

    5. Re:so what? by Kindaian · · Score: 1

      TOO LATE!

    6. Re:so what? by Spackler · · Score: 2

      Nope--trademarks live forever, as long as the holder prevents them from falling into common usage...

      Umm, little late.

      -Spackzilla

    7. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was this dude who was a cameraman ( or one of
      the crew ). He was a burly dude that looked
      kinda like a gorilla, so they nicknamed him
      with a mix nickname of a whale ( kujira ) and a gorilla ( gorira ).
      kujira + gorira = gojira, so the name doesn't mean nothing, it's something...
      I think this was way before doka-ben

    8. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a stab in the dark, but your name wouldn't happen to be Craig (alias endoboy) would it?

    9. Re:so what? by jesser · · Score: 1

      Mothra... that's a Bugzilla, right?

      Yes. Bugzilla.mozilla.org is hosted on a server called mothra.mozilla.org. I think bugzilla.mozilla.org used to be on komodo.mozilla.org.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    10. Re:so what? by Izanagi · · Score: 1

      Zilla
      \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

      --
      SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
    11. Re:so what? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why even bother attacking a project like Mozilla?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    12. Re:so what? by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

      mpe wrote:

      (that endoboy wrote:)
      >> mothra will protect us.

      > "Mothra" describes that the chracter is based on a
      > moth.

      Indeed. The name originates from "mosu" (Japanese mangling of English "moth") plus "lah" (Malaysian particle for emphasis, rendered in Japanese and English as "ra").

      > Is the name "Godzilla" entirely made up or does
      > it actually mean something.

      It's actually the nickname of a crew member of the original Godzilla movie. "Go" comes from the English "gorilla". "Jira" is from the Japanese word for "whale". "Jira" is rendered in the English title as "dzilla". "Zilla" is imitative of their trademark, but since Godzilla's name in Japanese is not "Gozira", I'm not sure how much grounds they have. I'm also not sure if either the Japanese or American versions of the movie "Gojira" have entered the public domain yet, as some Godzilla movies have.

      Appealing to Mothra is quite correct. She has as long a history of hating this type of behavior as Toho has of practicing it. As GMK once again proved, the Godzilla series is dependant on her for its survival. Since Toho bases its monsters on real deities (Mothra is based on Amaterasu omi kami, Japan's great Sun Goddess), one may have some expectation of getting some help out of them. Godzilla himself might be of some help, since he has recently been giving nods to open source in his movies.

      Time to sing some Mothra songs.

      "Compassionate Sun, Sun Goddess, Great Mothra! Great Mothra! Mothra!"
      Japanese language "Mothra's Song", "Ebirah, Horror of the Deep"

    13. Re:so what? by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      If Toho actually brings a lawsuit, will it be called Slappzilla? How do you say frivolous in Japanese? This is like Microsoft suing Andersen and Pella over use of the term "windows."

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    14. Re:so what? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people already call big dogs Dogzilla, and fat people Buttzilla. Adding "zilla" to things that are big fell into common useage a long time ago. Davezilla should tell Toho to suck Dickzilla.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  2. As reported on the register. by iamwoodyjones · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, everyone is right. Slashdot is starting to become a comment board for the register.

    1. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except with 500% more Anti-MS trolls, all modded up as FUNNY. Hooray for Slashdot and its narrow-minded troll mentality!

    2. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all the trolls on slashdot are anti-Linux. All the anti-Microsoft people are referred to as "positive contributors"

    3. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all the trolls on slashdot are anti-Linux. All the anti-Microsoft people are referred to as "positive contributors"

      So how does post after post of (paraphrasing), "OMG Micro$oft is big corporate FUD jerks information wants to be free LOL" count as "positive"? It's just trolling, but when you say crap like that around fanboys, it gets counted as "funny".

    4. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the New York Times -- notice the stories every Tuesday from the Circuits section.

    5. Re:As reported on the register. by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Without, of course, reciting The Register, because we hate them. Or something. Even though "Roblimo" writes articles for NewsForge which then appear on The Register, because of an agreement between VA Sheep's Bladders and The Register, because we don't hate them. Or something. Colonel Mustard, with the Candlestick in the Kitchen. I think.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    6. Re:As reported on the register. by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      He's saying the same thing you are. Read what he wrote again, and note his use of quotes.

    7. Re:As reported on the register. by ivan256 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The difference between slashdot and The Register is more that The Register claims to be a ligitimate news source, while slashdot acknowledges that it posts somebody else's stories.

      On slashdot when a story is incorrect or misquoted, you can look at the comments and find out that the poster/editor is an idiot. The Register will make shit up, then run stories based on the initial false presumption for months. Then, you have no way to tell that they are idiots if they're your primnary news source.

    8. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Thanks. You've handed me my ass, but haven't given me the source to the changes you've made. You're in violation of the GPL!

    9. Re:As reported on the register. by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

      I resemble that remark!

      (PROUDLY)

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    10. Re:As reported on the register. by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, and I personally like the diarrhea color scheme of Slashdot better than the register.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    11. Re:As reported on the register. by Artifex · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and I personally like the diarrhea color scheme of Slashdot better than the register

      Oh, you should hang out in the Apple section, where it's minty-fresh, pastel diarrhea!

      Okay, enough zilla-ness. (that's what the lawyers said!)

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    12. Re:As reported on the register. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've handed me my ass, but haven't given me the source to the changes you've made.

      ok, here is the source.

    13. Re:As reported on the register. by MicroBerto · · Score: 2

      Oddly enough, this is what I get when I eat any amount of Trix cereal! I guess it's just for kids...

      --
      Berto
    14. Re:As reported on the register. by Chexsum · · Score: 0

      No, I am pro-Linux and I am moderated as a Troll.

      --
      Pixels keep you awake!
    15. Re:As reported on the register. by flonker · · Score: 2

      Silly rabbit, tricks are for hookers!

  3. Going Nowhere by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

    This isnt really accurate... Im pretty sure....

    --
    Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    1. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this mean Microsoft can sue anything containing the name "micro" or "soft"?

    2. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yes, your penis is in big trouble now isnt it?

    3. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll admit it took me a second. But that was BY FAR the funniest thing I've ever read on slashdot!!!

    4. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's an old joke.

    5. Re:Going Nowhere by langed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Microsoft should sue Martha Stewart for using her MICROwave to SOFTen the butter, claiming trademark infringement.

    6. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not so much big trouble...

    7. Re:Going Nowhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh hahahah hahah, DAMN funny!

      Way to smack that whore with your pimp stick.
      R doo bee yah ess ?

    8. Re:Going Nowhere by floop · · Score: 2, Informative
      A quick search of google shows they have quite a battle ahead of them.

      • gozilla.com
      • gamezilla.com
      • trafficzilla.com
      • bowlzilla.com
      • punezilla.com
      • brad-zilla.com
      • sketchzilla.com
      • godzillascorner.com
      • zillaclothing.co.uk
      • zilladesign.com
      • zillasports.com
      • web-zilla.com
      • Accton (a japanese company) has a hub product name zill http://www.accton.co.jp/products/ZILLA/top.html
      • Zilla Monster cartoons http://www.offthemark.com/monsters/monsters.htm

      The list goes on and on....

  4. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Davezilla seems to clearly rely on familiarity with Toho's Godzilla trademark and the look of the Godzilla character. Mozilla's gone even farther.

    Lesson to be learned: Be original, don't use others' ideas without their permission.

    Whoops, forgot, this is Thiefdot, where if it's a Big Bad Corporation, it's ok to steal ideas from it...

    1. Re:Good by topham · · Score: 2

      So your honestly saying that you were confused and thought Davezilla was acting on behalf of the company that owns the tm for Godzilla?

      Now thats funny

    2. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoops, forgot, this is Thiefdot, where if it's a Big Bad Corporation, it's ok to steal ideas from it...

      GRRR! I will mod you down for telling the truth! Feel my wrath!

    3. Re:Good by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you suppose they'll come down on Neo Monster Island next? How about Club Tokyo? Okay, probably facetious examples, as they are fan-sites, and are either going to be regarded as free advertising for various kaiju products, or as parody sites (well, as least the T.K.T. on NMI is) and therefore likely to be held immune.

      However, I don't think Mozilla quite reaches the point (in my personal, non-lawyerish opinion) where it is trademark infringement. I mean, a red dinosaur? Everyone knows that Godzilla is green. Well, except for the Bandai Hyper Burning Goji.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:Good by JCMay · · Score: 2

      But, according to this PDF file (see page. 29-30), IDEAS can't be copyrighted, only the embodiment.

      Seems to me that based on the logic of the linked PDF file, both are fine, copyright-wise.

      Now, if the dragon Godzilla is trademarked, that's a different story since that deals with "trade dress" and consumer confusion.

    5. Re:Good by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Entertainment has its own trademark category. IANAL but unless Toho is offering Godzilla-branded telecommunication services, there's no likelihood of customer confusion and Toho has no legitimate right to crack down on unrelated uses (they're just proving the system can be abused by anyone with deep pockets).

      Trademarks aren't about originality but authenticity and reputation. "Stealing" ideas is good--that's how civilization advances!

    6. Re:Good by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here is a TESS search for the Godzilla trademark. You can look through there and see what they have trademarks on.

    7. Re:Good by sealawyer · · Score: 1

      That link is for a search session that will expire after a while. It's dead now.

      Just to sum up things. Toho owns the Godzilla trademark on movies, and related entertainment services, toys, comic books, t shirts, etc. In short not for anything like web browsers.

      But that isn't how the suit will be decided. The court will do weigh a bunch of factors (8 or so) to determine if there is a likelihood of confusion. Usage on disimilar products is only one factor.

      Most likely, Toho will suggest that their mark is famous which means they get to argue that Mozilla dilutes the strength of their mark. If they can establish Godzilla as famous, then it doesn't matter much that the products bearing the mark are different as long as the channels used for advertising overlap.

    8. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply append an 'H' --- Zillah, in the Bible, is a wife of Lamech. Mozillah, Davezillah, Godzillah ... works for me! Lamech, by the way, was a descendant of Cain (and therefore accursed, like Bill Gates and John Ashcroft).

    9. Re:Good by markbthomas · · Score: 1
      Umm. that TESS search listed a bunch of other *zilla names:
      • Speedzilla
      • Budzilla
      • Clutchzilla
      • Rodzilla
      • Bugzilla (pest control spray)
      Surely if these are valid Trade Marks, then there's nothing wrong with Mozilla, Bugzilla-the-defect-control-mechanism, or Davezilla.
    10. Re:Good by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Surely if these are valid Trade Marks, then there's nothing wrong with Mozilla, Bugzilla-the-defect-control-mechanism, or Davezilla.

      Maybe they asked permission first?

      --
      Delphis
  5. Hard to argue by Heem · · Score: 2

    While I love mozilla and the logo is kick-ass...

    It's hard to argue with this.. it does seem to be pretty blatant... hopefully they can come to an agreement...

    --
    Don't Tread on Me
    1. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really like both the name and the logo? Honestly, I think they are part of the reason that Mozilla will never catch on in the corporate world. This is especially true for Bugzilla. I mean, come on, what kind of name is that? It makes it sound like a product created by/for 13 year old kids.

    2. Re:Hard to argue by gengee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excuse me? It's a clear case of fair use. Have corporations really been so successful in pulling the blinds over our collective eyes that people do not take issue with a company claiming ownership of the formative 'zilla' and any remote likeness of a "reptile-like creature?"

      This would be roughly equivalent to the owners of the Chef Boyardee trademark claiming ownership of "Chef" when used in conjunction with any food product:P

      Trademarks are NOT ownership of a word. It is ownership of a brand. Hence, I can call my product "Kleenex" if I'm selling candy. If I'm selling tissue, however, you can bet Kimberly-Clark would come knocking.

      --
      - James
    3. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all.

      First of all, nobody could possibly confuse Godzilla with Mozilla.

      Second, it's obviously just a humorous play on words.

      Their icon is probably the only real problem for them. It certainly should be the only problem, if our courts are sane. Ooooops.

    4. Re:Hard to argue by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Excuse me? It's a clear case of fair use.

      Fair use does not apply to trademarks only copyrights. Two very different worlds. The name and image of Godzilla make up the trademark. The image of Godzilla is a copyrighted image. Trademarks are handles by the USPTO while Copyrights are handled by the Libary of Congress.

    5. Re:Hard to argue by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      huh? what about the FIRST PART OF THE NAME - *GOD*

      do they claim to own that? if they are going after "zilla" words, you should be able to throw it out due to the fact that we know how rediculous it would be if they claimed the same on any sites / words containing GOD in them.

    6. Re:Hard to argue by aronc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Copyrights are handled by the Libary of Congress.


      Really? I would have sworn they were handled by the Copyright Interests through their agents - the congress, the house, and the president.

      Now excuse me. I have to clean my computer after checking those links. Where did I put the hydrochloric?

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    7. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I disagree... I think it would be easy to argue:

      Toho has no trademark on 'Zilla, because the use of that term for just about everything has become so common in the language that it no longer deserves trademark protection.

      Just as Johnson & Johnson lost its grip on "Band-Aid" which is now a synonym for bandage.

      The use of "'zillas" goes back many years and a trademark owner is required to agressively and proactively defend its trademark from dilution.

      "'Zilla" is diluted, there's a pretty strong argument for that. And that defeats a trademark.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    8. Re:Hard to argue by GuidoJ · · Score: 1

      In a country where people sue restaurants for serving too hot coffee, stores for letting them trip over their own child and car manufacturers for not sitting behind the wheel while driving, I suggest you take this kind of thing very seriously.

    9. Re:Hard to argue by seebs · · Score: 5, Informative

      "fair use" is a feature of copyright law, and refers to specific kinds of usage (not just "anything I feel like"). Trademark law doesn't have that; you can use the trademarked thing only to refer to the trademarked product. If you were "passing off", or trying to use the name to refer to something *else*, that would be considered a violation. So, for instance, you can make gas caps and say "compatible with Ford Explorer", because you're using their trademark to refer to their product. On the other hand, if you were to create cans of processed meat labeled "SPAN" in yellow letters on a blue background showing a plate of ham-like substance, you would probably be sued, and rightfully so.

      'zilla' is a lot more like "Boyardee" than like "Chef". I certainly can't think of a lot of uses of it before Godzilla showed up.

      Some marks are deemed "famous", such that they get to reserve the whole field. This may be a bad design, but it's how the laws are written.

      Consider this: If I produce a candy called "Ford Bubblegum", no one is going to think it's a car, or that I'm doing it with a license from the car company.

      On the other hand, if I sold kitchen aprons labeled "Boyardee", someone might figure that, while it's not soup, it was clearly trying to take advantage of their fame.

      Here's the question: Would a typical user, confronted with a large dinosaur-like thing that walks on its back legs and has things down its back, and breathes fire, and has a name ending in "zilla", be likely to infer an association between that product and Godzilla?

      Yes, the user would.

      Thus, it's probably a violation.

      IANAL, but for fuck's sake, people, *THINK*. This looks exactly like trying to take advantage of someone else's product name and reputation to make your own product look cooler; in this case, trying to take the "big unstoppable monster" aspect of Godzilla and apply it to a browser. It even shows the traditional fire-breathing thing in the splash screen!

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    10. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It makes it sound like a product created by/for 13 year old kids.
      You mean it wasn't??
    11. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      swap out that coffee example for a valid one. the coffee lawsuit was entirely justified and proper. look into it.

    12. Re:Hard to argue by SerpicoWasTaken · · Score: 1

      While I don't think Toho would win a case like this, I think they are in a bit of a bind. If they don't make an effort to protect their trademark, they'll lose it, and I imagine losing the Godzilla trademark would be disasterous for the company. The Mozilla name and image are clearly a take off on Godzilla. Frankly, the Mozilla people should have approached Toho beforehand.

    13. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entirely justified? Are you out of your mind?!?!

      Coffee is HOT. The lady spilled it on her lap, yet somehow it's THEIR fault? Whatever!

    14. Re:Hard to argue by peg0cjs · · Score: 1

      Wow! All that is happening in Japan these days????

      --
      Karma: Excellent (Mainly due to Bill & Ted's Karma Adventure)
    15. Re:Hard to argue by plugger · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure about your Band-Aid example. Isn't Band-Aid a stateside generic term for sticking plasters? It seems to me that for the example to hold, we would have to refer to our web browsers as 'Mozillas', even IE users.

    16. Re:Hard to argue by naasking · · Score: 1

      people sue restaurants for serving too hot coffee

      I thought as you did on this issue until I read the details of the case. The coffee was over 180 degrees Fahrenheit capable of causing third degree burns; well over commonly accepted safe temperatures. It was also not the first complaint McD's received on this issue, yet they did nothing about it. McD's was malicious in many other areas and deserved to lose (see here for details).

    17. Re:Hard to argue by Jelloman · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Zilla is very diluted.

      ZZ Top used the car "Cadzilla" in their videos. Hot Wheels even made one for their "Legends" series.

    18. Re:Hard to argue by cduffy · · Score: 1

      There's coffee that's hot, and then there's coffee that's that hot -- sufficiently hot to cause severe scalding, which coffee which is only usually hot won't. They had been informed that it was a safety hazard, and persisted anyhow to keep their costs down (hotter coffee -> less beans needed).

      As the poster said, go look up the details.

    19. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She had third-degree burns--her skin was charred and she had to be hospitalized for skin grafts. What they handed her was a weapon, not a drink, and she's wasn't the first customer crippled by that restaurant.

    20. Re:Hard to argue by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, while there may be some contention over the "dinosaur" picture, there is little possibility for problems with the use of "zilla" in the name. Apparently, that word has existed since at least 1913, and the first movie (Gojira) didn't come out until 1954. As best as I can tell, Godzilla wasn't used until the 1956 American release.

      Also, they don't have a trademark on the use of a dinosaur. At best, they can keep you from using "Zilla" in conjunction with a dinosaur logo, but they surely should not be able to keep you from using one or the other alone.

      Personally, I think they should just back the heck off and count all of this as free advertising. It's not like they are losing any money as a result of these types of uses. All they are getting with a lawsuit is negative publicity. If they must protect their trademark, then at least come to an agreement that allows interested parties permission to specialized use of the name and/or logo.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    21. Re:Hard to argue by Kindaian · · Score: 1

      Personnally i think they are almost bankrupt and need an urgent influx of capital...

      So they start to look at all those IP that they spend the shareholders money to protect and now they remember that they have to protect them.

      Good luck...

    22. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and she's wasn't the first customer crippled by that restaurant.

      Indeed. I know a woman whose ass is so fat from 20 years of mcnuggets that she can not fit through doors.

    23. Re:Hard to argue by faaaz · · Score: 1

      'zilla' is actually a name for a plant. According to dictionary.com (and Websters):

      "A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs."

      Sure, the logo could be changed to the leaf of that plant. Problem solved.

      --
      we come in peace / shoot to kill
    24. Re:Hard to argue by isaac · · Score: 5, Informative
      Just as Johnson & Johnson lost its grip on "Band-Aid" which is now a synonym for bandage.

      If you think so, just try marketing a bandage called "Band-Aid" - Johnson & Johnson's well-funded legal department would be on your ass directly. Similarly, Kimberly-Clark ain't gonna let you sell "Kleenex" facial tissues. Xerox won't let you market "Xerox" machines. The Thermos company will lay the legal hurt on you if you try to sell vacuum insulated bottles by that name.

      The only former trademarks I can think of that have actually lost their protection are "Asprin" and "Heroin," which were both US trademarks belonging to Bayer AG until 1919 when the IP rights to these two "wonder drugs" were ceded in the Treaty of Versailles, NOT because they became generic terms. Aspirin became a generic term because the trademark was stripped, not the other way around.

      -Isaac

      --
      I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    25. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Isn't Band-Aid a stateside generic term for sticking plasters?

      Isn't that what I said?

      For the example to hold, "Band Aid" would have had to have been diluted such that it has entered the language:

      1) Band Aid is a synonym for a self adhesive strip bandage.
      2) Band Aid is an adjective meaning "A haphazard repair done quickly and temporary in nature"
      3) Band Aid was a fund raising concert for starving people in africa.

      That's pretty diluted. Just as 'Zilla has entered the language:
      BugZilla
      DiffZilla
      MoZilla
      Go!Zilla
      TrafficZilla
      and what was the phrase the judge in the Mattel v. Aqua/MCA/et.al. call Mattel?

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    26. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, the devil is in the details. because, if you go and look up how to make coffee, you realize that 180 degrees F is what the water needs to be initially heated to for the percolation to occur properly.

      Heck, have you ever *seen* an espresso machine? It is a pressurized steam center. VERY hot.

      Now, while McDicks ought to be more responsible for what goes into the cup, don't think they had no reason whatsoever for heating the water that far.

    27. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chef Boyardee" isn't really food, so I'm not sure your argument holds ;-)


      mmmm... meatballs...

    28. Re:Hard to argue by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "This would be roughly equivalent to the owners of the Chef Boyardee trademark claiming ownership of "Chef" when used in conjunction with any food product:P"

      No, it'd be the equivalent of calling yourself "Chef MoArdee" and your logo look like Colonel Sanders with a Chef's hat.

      I'm not saying I agree with the suit, but I do think I understand it. The Mozilla team made a huge mistake by calling it Mozilla and giving it an 'overgrown lizard' look to it. They could have gotten away with either/or, but few people would look at it and not recognize the Godzilla reference.

      Again, not saying I support it, just saying that they really could have used a little more common sense. The only defense they have is that they're not making badly dubbed movies.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    29. Re:Hard to argue by gengee · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "fair use" is a feature of copyright law, and refers to specific kinds of usage (not just "anything I feel like"). Trademark law doesn't have that; you can use the trademarked thing only to refer to the trademarked product.


      Ummm...You wish? Actually, I take it from your post that you don't wish - You're just misinformed. Trademark law does, and always has had, the concept of 'Fair Use'. I would refer you to the Lanham Act which covers the topic.

      Further, it has been made clear in innumerable court cases in the US that anyone is free to use any trademark for any purpose, so long as the consumer would not normally be confused by the use. To wit, in Soeco, Inc v. Shell Oil Co: "[A]nyone is free to use the term in its primary, descriptive sense so long as such use does not lead to customer confusion as to the source of the goods or services."

      Your "Boyardee" argument is valid, but I believe my original point is still valid, because Davezilla is not making movies (Or action figures, comic books, or otherwise trying to trade on the Godzilla character)
      --
      - James
    30. Re:Hard to argue by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      No, it'd be the equivalent of calling yourself "Chef MoArdee" and your logo look like Colonel Sanders with a Chef's hat.

      Not really - Mozilla and Godzilla are in rather different categories... Godzilla = character, Mozilla = web browser. There's much less chance of confusing that ("Oh, I thought I was downloading Godzilla merchandise, not a web browser!!!") than in the example you provided.

    31. Re:Hard to argue by PW2 · · Score: 1

      It worked for Gateway2000 --> Gateway

    32. Re:Hard to argue by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      If you are too stupid to drink coffee, you should be put into a geriatric clinic (or equivalent) but you should not be honored for your stupidity.

    33. Re:Hard to argue by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      No, you have two names that sound alike, and two logos/images that have a similarity. You can't look at Mozilla's name, then Mozilla's logo, then not think of Godzilla. I think it's ridiculous that the owners of the Godzilla trademark think that Mozilla's gonna do any damage to the value of it, but if I squint really hard I can see why they'd go on the offensive. If somebody makes a trademark like yours, and you do nothing to stop them, then it's that much easier for somebody else to come along and snag it.

      The problem with trademarks in the United States is that they force you to take offensive action any time you think you're in danger. If you don't, it's percieved as 'permission'. I am not kidding. This is why Disney and Paramount are so 'evil' about protecting their property. If I draw Mickey Mouse on my shirt, then soembody else gets inspired to make Mickey Mouse shirts, Disney has to sue me first before they can sue the next guy.

      The internet presents a new problem: The little guy can have trademarks, but he/she cannot afford to sue anybody. I hope the Gov't figures this out one day and reworks the TM system a bit.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    34. Re:Hard to argue by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Mozilla's logo, eh? You mean the red T-rex dinosaur?

    35. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      So are kids stuck on band-aid 'cuz band-aid's stuck on them?

      Oh wait, no they aren't anymore... Now kids are stuck on band-aid BRAND...

      I wonder why they changed the jingle... hmmm...

      No, you can't market bandages with that name, but as far as dilution is concerned, it's gone. So coming back to the TOPIC as to can DaveZilla argue that Toho doesn't have claim to "Zilla"... No they don't unless DaveZilla is a movie or toy of a large mothra-fighting lizard.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    36. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's half right though, after a period of time a well known product becomes the standard name for any and all imitations.

      Frisbee for instance, ala the flying disk.

      Hula-hoop, ala the round disk thingy.

      Ace bandage.

      Band-aid.

      Slurpee. Popsickle. There's a million out there. Not that it's a relevant point.

      *DA goes and cries in his corner*

    37. Re:Hard to argue by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Those are good starting places, but you're
      forgetting this logo:

      Mozilla's Splash Page.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    38. Re:Hard to argue by Narcissus · · Score: 1
      Here's the question: Would a typical user, confronted with a large dinosaur-like thing that walks on its back legs and has things down its back, and breathes fire, and has a name ending in "zilla", be likely to infer an association between that product and Godzilla?

      Yes, the user would.

      This question refers to the logo, as opposed to the browser name, right? Because the way I see it, is "Would a typical user, confronted with a benign web browser, and has a name ending in 'zilla', be likely to infer an association between that product and Godzilla, the well-known dinosaur?"

      No, the user would not. Well, they might through the name, think they sound similar, but then again, would the user assume that this means that the owners of Godzilla have decided to not only go to the effort of creating web browsers, but then changing the name of the product? No.

      The logo, I understand Toho to have a problem with, the product name, I don't. People cannot confuse a dinosaur with a web browser when they have different names.

    39. Re:Hard to argue by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      >Isn't that what I said?

      Maybe to the US audience.

      here in the UK a "bandage" is a cotton thing you use to "bandage" things up and make slings and things (well you used to, there are more specific things these days!)

      where as a plaster is not a bandage, it's a plaster and NEVER a bandage. Though I guess you probably call plasters bandages for some reason (inbreeding? ;-) )

      Damn the subtelties of language!

      Next you'll be calling a cormorant a shag.

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    40. Re:Hard to argue by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative


      Your "Boyardee" argument is valid, but I believe
      my original point is still valid, because
      Davezilla is not making movies (Or action
      figures, comic books, or otherwise trying to
      trade on the Godzilla character)

      And his dragon resembles the one on the Welsh flag
      (http://www.data-wales.co.uk/flag.htm) far more than it does Godzilla.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    41. Re:Hard to argue by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      Godzilla was not the first fire-breathing dragon ever drawn. Not by centuries. Why do you expect these people to succeed with fire-breathing dragons where Disney failed with cartoon mice?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    42. Re:Hard to argue by naasking · · Score: 1

      Now, while McDicks ought to be more responsible for what goes into the cup, don't think they had no reason whatsoever for heating the water that far.

      Indeed they did: it was cheaper operating the machine consistently at the same temperature than allowing the coffee to cool to acceptable levels before serving it.

    43. Re:Hard to argue by naasking · · Score: 1

      If you are too stupid to drink coffee, you should be put into a geriatric clinic (or equivalent) but you should not be honored for your stupidity.

      This has little to do with rewarding stupidity but is about responsibility and acceptable safety precautions. Did you even read the link? I truly dislike arguing with the uninformed.

    44. Re:Hard to argue by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      a.) When did Disney fail with cartoon mice? (never heard of that...)

      b.) Why are you asking me? I'm not the one filing suit here. I think the whole thing's stupid. I think Mozilla's stupid for expecting this, and I think the TM holder of Godzilla's stupid for pursuing it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    45. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... you got it all wrong.

      It's time that Mozilla gets some credit and bucks for keeping the Godzilla name alive. I'm never going to mistake a browser for a japanese monster movie monster. But every time I see the Mozilla name I get this warm fuzzy feeling and I think, "Gosh wouldn't it be great to see a Godzilla movie."

      And besides, isn't Mozilla _really_ supposed to rhyme with quesadilla? ...Yeah, that's it, Mozeeya the little Mo' thing.

    46. Re:Hard to argue by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      When did Disney fail with cartoon mice? (never
      heard of that...)

      Ever heard of Mighty Mouse?

      Why are you asking me?

      It was a generic you.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    47. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I wanted to keep this short. :-(

      Your characterization of trademark has a few probems. Firstly, trademarks protect the owner of the mark from having others misuse their mark to cause a "likelihood of confusion" as to the "source of origin" of the product. One violation of this is when one tries to "pass off" a product that is so substantially similar to the authentic product, using the trademark of the authentic, to confuse the public. If there is not a "likelihood of confusion" as to the source of origin of the product, there is no trademark infringement.

      This is one reason that the infringement action brought by Ford Motor Co. against the domain "fordsucks.com" fails under trademark law. Noone but a moron would possibly believe that domain points to the source of origin as being the Ford Motor Co. (Now if Ford Motors trademarked "ford sucks" for one if its products, the answer under trademark law might be different :-)

      Another aspect of trademark law is that the mark is restricted to certain categories of goods and services. You can sell bedsheets and name them "Ford Bedsheets" without infringing the Ford Motor Co. trademark (unless perhaps you advertise or otherwise imply they are a good fit for the rear seats of Ford cars). Ford is "primarily merely a surname", that has acquired "secondary meaning" within the automotive industry; But Ford does not have "secondary meaning" or trademark rights in every other industry.

      This requirement that the trademark applicant specify the goods and services they seek protection for is part the reason that the suit by Molson for its mark on "Canadian" for its beer against the registrant of the canadian.biz domain fails under trademark law. Another reason, in that case, is that "Canadian" is a generic term, and no one company can secure rights to a generic term for any and all uses.

      As a somewhat minor point, contary to what you suggest, anyone can use a trademarked product that is authentic for whatever they want ... period. They can also "use" a knock-off product unless their use is in commerce (e.g., selling it as the authentic). Trademark law does not have a restriction on the use of an authentic item.

      OK, I don't read Japanese, so I don't know what Toho is in the business of; But judging from their trademarks, it's toys and things like that. Check out what you find with a USPTO trademark search. You might be surprised at the number of "zillas" that are trademarked, and the narrow scope of Toho's trademark rights as to categories to which their mark applies.

      Toho probably has the theory that having a "zilla" used with what you call a "dinosaur-like thing" is confusing as to the source of origin. Personally, I don't see how anyone would be confused that a company that makes or distributes plastic toys, comic books, posters, etc., is somehow related to the source of origin of the leading state-of-the-art browser. I also doubt that they have enforceable trademark rights on fire-breathing, dinosaur-like things per se, since marks on "drawings" are inherently weak and restricted to the particular drawing registered (unless perhaps, the drawings are confusingly similar to the marked drawing, but drawings are really the realm of copyright).

      Personally, if they do go after mozilla.org, I say mozilla should tell Toho to shove it and request attorney fees, costs, and treble damages for having brought a suit in bad faith. Then again, I think that davezilla should do the same thing, but last I read he was conceding to Toho on the picture part even though his zilla looked like a scrawny runt of the litter and not a "god"zilla.

      Just my 2 cents.

    48. Re:Hard to argue by saikou · · Score: 1

      Xerox has lost trademark protection in Russia.
      Because of their oversuccessive marketing campaign, any photocopier is called "Xerox" (I guess it's a photocopy of story with Kangaroo as the animal name).
      Wonderful combinations such as "Xerox from Canon" sprang into life and are common these days there. :)

    49. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The generic term in the US is "adhesive bandage", but of course everybody calls them Band-Aids. They're cotton gauze attached to a strip of plastic or cotton tape that sticks to dry skin near a wound. We only use plaster for casts to set broken bones (and sometimes for building walls, though that's usually sheetrock now)--do you use it for scrapes and cuts somehow?

    50. Re:Hard to argue by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      If you think so, just try marketing a bandage called "Band-Aid" - Johnson & Johnson's well-funded legal department would be on your ass directly. Similarly, Kimberly-Clark ain't gonna let you sell "Kleenex" facial tissues. Xerox won't let you market "Xerox" machines. The Thermos company will lay the legal hurt on you if you try to sell vacuum insulated bottles by that name.

      All this is true. However, GETTING BACK TO THE STORY AT HAND, this guy is not a filmmaker. He isn't creating cinematic art and labeling it with a zilla ending. In other words, he's not in their market. This is why you can have Apple Computer and Apple Records and Apple Auto Sales and none of them are infringing each other.

    51. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to further generalise it to "I think you're all stupid"

    52. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      However, Mozilla isn't trying to link itself in thought to a thorny scrub plant. Judges usually DO take context into account.

      Of course, they'll also take into account that there is no "Godzilla Brand Internet Browser" in existence either.

    53. Re:Hard to argue by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I'd like to further generalise it to "I think you're all stupid"

      You're mighty brave in cyberspace, flame boy. I can see why you chose to remain anymous.

      I should get a +1 Funny comment for successfully quoting Wally from Dilbert. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    54. Re:Hard to argue by Shelled · · Score: 2
      IANAL, but for fuck's sake, people, *THINK*.

      Think deeper. The fact that 'zilla' was popularized in a 60's Japanese movie does not lock it's usage in all commercial and non-commercial contexts in perpetuity.

      Here's the question: Would a typical user, confronted with a large dinosaur-like thing that walks on its back legs and has things down its back, and breathes fire, and has a name ending in "zilla", be likely to infer an association between that product and Godzilla?

      Would they confuse a web browser with a product of the Toho movie company? No, they wouldn't.

    55. Re:Hard to argue by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Oh wait, no they aren't anymore... Now kids are stuck on band-aid BRAND...

      I wonder why they changed the jingle... hmmm...


      Because trademarks are supposed to be used as adjectives; legally, you're much safer calling them band-aid brand bandages instead of band-aids. This is a sign that they are defending their trademark, not that they lost it.

    56. Re:Hard to argue by benjamindees · · Score: 1
      A) This is not a "product".


      B) "Trade laws" don't apply to non-profit groups such as Mozilla.org


      C) There is not such a thing as "trademark dilution".


      that is all...

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    57. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      *sigh* when will you people understand... Band Aid has already lost the "uniqueness" of their name through dilution.

      You guys are stuck on "You either have it or you don't" when that is untrue. Nobody making self adhesive bandages can market them as "Band aids". But a plumber who repairs leaks can market "I bandaid your leaky faucet".

      Now if I made my own brand of adhesive bandages called "Mag a gag", a plumber who repairs leaks cannot say "I mag a gag your leaky faucet" because *MY* brand name has not been diluted. I could sue him for dilution of *MY* trademark even though on its face it doesn't seem like this plumber is going to sell you my self adhesive bandages.

      Johnson & Johnson has lost that bit of their trademark... Okay let me say this again because you guys don't seem to be reading it... They haven't lost the right to exclusively market their product in their market... They've lost the right to sue someone trying to dilute their trademark.

      So coming BACK TO THE TOPIC... Toho has lost "Zilla" to dilution. If "DaveZilla" is some sort of fiction about a city smashing lizard from the sea, they ABSOLUTELY can sue for misappropriation of their "GODZILLA" mark. However because "Zilla" has been DILUTED, they can't go after anyone using the notion of "Zilla" created by their GODZILLA movies (well they can, but they'll lose).

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    58. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God Over Djinn-Zilla?

    59. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least we will have fun filtering out all the Godzilla .Please all who can do this help and write Godzilla filtering-killing software to boycott as much as possible their product.
      Any companies out there utilizing Godzilla should watch out as it ant product associated with it will be boycotted.
      And another thing, would it be possible to sue Godzilla for having offended us religious people , it is very balsphemous and I am sure there are laws against using God in a commercial context!

    60. Re:Hard to argue by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 2

      A cursory glance through google reveals

      Go!zilla
      zilla clothing
      zilla design
      zilla sports
      zilla motor control
      trafficzilla
      a Japanese Zilla 10 base T hub
      bowlzilla
      3d zilla

      zilla is listed in dictionary.com as "a low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides)".

      It also lists the origin as "Mosaic Killer / Godzilla?" which will make the case harder to argue.

      I'd write something insightful about Lindows, and how Mozilla's trademark is in fact a T-Rex and has never been more Godzilla like than becoming firebreathing, a common feature of imaginary giant dinosaurs (which I find quite ironic to write from a copy of Opera). But I need to run to work, so you all are spared.

      -Chris

      --
      This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    61. Re:Hard to argue by orcrist · · Score: 1

      I Can't resist:

      At least we don't use 'holiday' to mean we're going away, when it just means a 'holy day', instead we use the much more sensible 'vacation'.
      Or a 'flat'? If you're talking about an apartment, it's anything but flat.

      Given those, I think the fusion of bandage and plaster is relatively harmless ;-)

      All in good fun, my British friend; both dialects have their idiosyncrasies.

      -Chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    62. Re:Hard to argue by Delphis · · Score: 1

      3) Band Aid was a fund raising concert for starving people in africa.

      No, that was 'Live Aid'.

      --
      Delphis
    63. Re:Hard to argue by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      You forgot Escalator. As others have pointed out, there have been other trademarks that that have been released due to a lack of pursuit.

    64. Re:Hard to argue by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      *sigh* when will you people understand...

      That if you don't have evidence, you resort to ad homine attacks?

    65. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a character out of fantasy godzilla aint no dinosaur....

      BITCH

    66. Re:Hard to argue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there was a Swiss band in the 70s called Kleenex, but when sued they changed to LiLiPUT. Kleenex also, I think, suppressed a song by Billy Idol's old band Generation X.

      but I get your point. LiLiPUT is really good, by the way.

    67. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      Exasperation does not always equal ad hominem. I like how you depend on removing one line from the whole argument. Look the phrase up some day.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    68. Re:Hard to argue by dvdeug · · Score: 2
      I like how you depend on removing one line from the whole argument.

      What argument?

      Johnson & Johnson has lost that bit of their trademark... Okay let me say this again because you guys don't seem to be reading it... They haven't lost the right to exclusively market their product in their market... They've lost the right to sue someone trying to dilute their trademark.


      is not an argument; it's a restatement of the facts as you see them, combined with attacks on your audience. Yes, we are reading it; no, we aren't believing it just on your say-so.
    69. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 2
      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    70. Re:Hard to argue by Wavicle · · Score: 2

      Apparently you aren't using google or reading the 9th circuit court's opinions either. Doesn't much matter.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    71. Re:Hard to argue by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      they're not trying to sell mozilla though. They're giving it away for free. I could start up a local KKK cult chapter and name it microsoft, and i doubt they (M$) could do a whole lot about it. besides, what is the user going to confuse a red dinasour (which i don't believe is named mozilla - that's simply the name of the software the dino is a mascot for) with? if sony (i think they own the godzila....trademark?) had produced a christmas special w/red godzilla & green godzilla, they might have a leg (tail?) to stand on.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  6. Tut mozlilla tormozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A godzilla govorilla
    Ty mozilla ne gorilla
    A bolshaya govorilla!

    1. Re:Tut mozlilla tormozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blya, shto za hoyinya?

  7. Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sun, 11 August, 2002
    Goodbye little dragon guy!
    [Blog] - Davezilla @ 07:07:43 pm
    re: DAVEZILLA.COM
    Dear Mr. Linabury:

    We represent Toho Co., Ltd ("Toho") in intellectual property matters. Toho is the owner of all rights in and to the trademark and service mark GODZILLA and the GODZILLA characters. In addition, the name "GODZILLA" and the likeness of Toho's GODZILLA character are federally registered trademarks belonging to Toho. Copies of Toho's U.S. Registrations for GODZILLA and the GODZILLA character image are enclosed.

    [Omitted long, dull paragraph about the history of Toho...]

    It has come to our attention that you have incorporated the "ZILLA" portion of our client's GODZILLA marks in the name of your "DAVEZILLA.COM" domain name, and that you have included a "reptile-like" character as well as a "monster-like" character, which you refer to as "GODZILLA", on your website accesible through "DAVEZILLA.COM." Please be advised that your use of the GODZILLA mark constitutes a trademark infringement and confuses consumers and the public into believing that your "GODZILLA" character originates from Toho, which it does not. Moreover, your use of the "ZILLA" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "DAVEZILLA.COM" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client, and demonstrates an attempt by you to trade on the goodwill built up by our client. As such, we request that you remove the objectionable imagery and reference to GODZILLA from your website to eliminate any likelihood of confusion and posibility of an inaccurate affiliation with Toho and GODZILLA.

    We look forward to receiving your prompt reply, with a statement of your intentions, no later than August 16, 2002. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

    Very truly yours,

    SEYFARTH SHAW

    Jill A. Jacobs

    Wow. Guess the little dragon at the top has to go bye-bye. At least they are letting me keep the domain name. A few inaccuracies: I have, until today, never mentioned Godzilla, nor do I have any imagery of him on this site. Nor do I refer to my logo as Godzilla. It's always been, "That little dragon guy." Could have been a lot worse. Expect a new no changes to the banner and changes a tweak to the colophon. I'm not giving in.

    1. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Guess some guy named Mark is gonna get hammered for registering "ZILLA.COM".

      Makes me want to run out and register "DRCALEBZILLA.COM". Perhaps if everyone registers a "ZILLA.COM" address we can do the reverse /. effect, and tie the lawyers up for years trying to track every one down.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Text in case of /.ing by punchdrunk · · Score: 1

      you have included a "reptile-like" character as well as a "monster-like" character, which you refer to as "GODZILLA"

      There is a big difference between this and what Mozilla does. They never explicitly refer to Godzilla.

    3. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFC. Dave says that this is not true.

    4. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get zillasucks.com instead.

    5. Re:Text in case of /.ing by thulldud · · Score: 1
      This is not as bad as I would have imagined from the headline. (Nothing new there, huh?) They just don't want you referring to the name "Godzilla" or to use Godzilla images on a site that includes the formative "-zilla" in its name. Cultural allusions are okay; trademark allusions are not. So Mozilla and The Register (among others) can stand down from alert.


      Once again, nothing to see here. Move along....

    6. Re:Text in case of /.ing by symbolic · · Score: 2

      Just switch the picture to a ferocious looking canine, and change the name to Dogzilla. : )

    7. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add the link to the lawyer's bio page.

      Here it is.

    8. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So all he LEGALY has to do is remove the name GODZILLA from anyware on his page, and then there is no more reference for users to get confused about. Any court can see the Davezilla Godzilla.

      These guys have no case and they know it.

      The funny thing would be, if this was successfull, and they did go after Mozilla, how much user response would happen. I mean, I use Mozilla every day and love it, and if it was thretened with a lawsuit, I would sure as hell contribute to a legal deffense fund. And I bet I'm not the only one.

      Say, 15,000 other people (out of all the Mozilla users) feel the same way, and we each donate $10 (not that much, the software is deffinatly worth it), thats a $150,000 legal deffense fund, not to mention that AOL/Time-Warner would probably pony up to prevent their investment.

    9. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      XerithaneZilla just doesn't work though. However I think LawyerZilla.com would be a cool domain.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    10. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Zordak · · Score: 2
      From davezilla
      I have, until today, never mentioned Godzilla, nor do I have any imagery of him on this site. Nor do I refer to my logo as Godzilla. It's always been, "That little dragon guy."
      He has a cartoon that a reader sent in to him with "Davezilla vs. Godzilla" after he got the letter from the lawyers. Prior to that, he did not use the name "Godzilla" on his site.
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    11. Re:Text in case of /.ing by oafylummox · · Score: 1

      so in affect calling something "zilla" we would confuse it with Toho characters, well personally im not english or retarded so i am not cunfused by this. the company makes the idea the for some random reason they are tryign to protect the consumers. the only protection we need is from a company as moronic as that. pardon me for i have to go create as many "zilla" websites and pictures as i can ;

    12. Re:Text in case of /.ing by Izanagi · · Score: 1

      WOW, Look how many domain have "zilla" in them. It will take a lot of court cases. Register.com return about 19!!!!

      --
      SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
    13. Re:Text in case of /.ing by pediddle · · Score: 1

      MOD PARENT UP!

      The letter only asks that davezilla.com remove the "objectionable imagery and reference to GODZILLA". So maybe (probably) Mozilla would have to get a new non-reptile logo, but Toho seemed to have no problem with the name "zilla" alone.

  8. Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What's next? Microsoft suing anyone with the words "Micro" or "Soft" in the name.

    1. Re:Ludicrous by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      Come on, lets be serious davezilla and mozilla were inspired by Godzilla (little dragon guy). While I think that the trademark owners are being totally stupid about this its their right.

      Its not just the Zilla or the God they are going after its the theme. If Dave really wanted to use the spider or plant meanings of the word why the hell did he put a little dragon at the top by the name (same goes for mozilla).

      Lets not be so totally anti-corporate we end up being so blind that when someone does really infringe on a trade mark we say ok.

      --
    2. Re:Ludicrous by gengee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Come on, lets be serious davezilla and mozilla were inspired by Godzilla (little dragon guy). While I think that the trademark owners are being totally stupid about this its their right.

      Yes - exactly. It was /inspired/ by Godzilla. But it's /not/ Godzilla. It's Davezilla. Can you honestly say that you could ever possibly confuse the two? That anyone could ever confuse the two? No? Well then there's no trademark infringement, since that is the benchmark.

      --
      - James
    3. Re:Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Merriam-Webster, the string "zilla" doesn't exist in any English words.

    4. Re:Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next? Microsoft suing anyone with the words "Micro" or "Soft" in the name.

      nope.... microsoft suing anyone with the word .NET in their domainname...

    5. Re:Ludicrous by einer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just Davezilla.com... Check out the list of other offending sites.

    6. Re:Ludicrous by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      Im no legal expert, But I dont think that matters much. The fact is if I made a web site N3WBZilla With a little dragon, I would be gaining market penetration through the Godzilla(tm)(c)(r)(ltd)(wtf) name recognition. I think it sucks because one has nothing to do with the other but you are using thier trademark property to push your own..

      While I never thought that Mozilla and Godzilla had anything to do with each other I would probable still be using Netscape or Opera if not for the fact I said to myself 'hey clever name' and checked it out.

      --
    7. Re:Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Molson recently sued because they have trademarked the word "canadian" for christ sakes. For years japan exported inferior clones of US products with the name just slightly altered.
      And now we have one of their companies complaining about something is not competing with their "Product" or any way causing a customer to be confused? You don't see the irony of that? I could agree with Honda suing Hyundai for example the pronunciation is almost identical and they are both automakers, but this is getting way out of hand.

    8. Re:Ludicrous by aronc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I never thought that Mozilla and Godzilla had anything to do with each other I would probable still be using Netscape or Opera if not for the fact I said to myself 'hey clever name' and checked it out.

      This is generally called "participating in your culture" or "cultural discourse" for the more academic among us. It is not trademark infringement.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    9. Re:Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... of course, if one were to break slashdot tradition and actually READ the article, the major infringing portion is the logo - to whit, one dragon-esque creature - when associated with that name suffix.

      You can have a logo of a dragon, dinosaur, whatever. You can slap -zilla on the end of any word you feel like.

      Just don't then associate the two. THAT is the infringement. And, in this case, it is.

      AC97

    10. Re:Ludicrous by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

      Holy cow! 680 sites?! I wonder if there are any 'zilla combinations left out there?

    11. Re:Ludicrous by mpe · · Score: 2

      According to Merriam-Webster, the string "zilla" doesn't exist in any English words.

      Looking in one American dictionary is hardly an exhaustive search to see if it is in any English words.

    12. Re:Ludicrous by afidel · · Score: 2

      Besides how does an opensource web browser compete in the same market as a movie franchise/toy franchise/cartoon franchise ????

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    13. Re:Ludicrous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm considering opening a fast food outlet and calling it "McFatty-Burger Fat-Food restuarant" and having a mascot called "Donald McFatty-Burger". I wonder if I'll be sued? Would any multinational fast-food chain want to associate their name with FAT?

    14. Re:Ludicrous by alexpage · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is probably a better list...

      And whatever you do, don't click on AnalZilla. Foolishly, I thought there couldn't be a pr0n site that badly named.

  9. God by Raster+Burn · · Score: 5, Funny

    On a related note, God decides to sue Toho for using the word "God" without His permission.

    1. Re:God by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where's he going to get the lawyers?

      Plus, I would assume that God would settle out of court. (Lightning rod anyone?)

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    2. Re:God by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Funny
      On a related note, God decides to sue Toho for using the word "God" without His permission.

      On the contrary, I hear that Toho is going after all religions that use the word "God", since "some of them have acted monstrously", and people might get confused.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:God by Mathgan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not funny.

    4. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's he going to get the lawyers?

      That's easy - any honest lawyers are killed very quickly and would probably go to Heaven. I am sure that every so often someone goes into Law with the idea of helping society like the DA office.

    5. Re:God by revery · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't they all work for his opposition...

    6. Re:God by goldspider · · Score: 2
      "Where's he going to get the lawyers?"

      An interesting question, since any lawyer worth their salt has already sold their immortal soul to the Dark One (or Bill Gates, take your pick).

      I love to root for the good guy, but in this case I think the Almighty is a little outmatched on this one.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    7. Re:God by llouver · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the road to hell is paved [by lawyers with] good intentions.

    8. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God has no need for lawyers. He's judge, jury, and executioner. If Toho wants defense lawyers, too bad, they're not allowed in the presence of the Judge.

    9. Re:God by Gehenna_Gehenna · · Score: 1
      I thought the dark one WAS Bill Gates..

      Or are you talking about the MPAA?

      --

    10. Re:God by thonot · · Score: 1

      Where's he going to get the lawyers?

      Are you kidding?
      Read the book of Job, Satan is God's lawyer, and Hell is God's legal department (why do you think people get sent there for punishment?)

    11. Re:God by jgomez1 · · Score: 1

      > Where's he going to get the lawyers?

      For this case, I do nominate the Spanish Inquisition.

      So God deserves. Amen.

    12. Re:God by PirateKing · · Score: 1

      Gives a new meaning to "devil's advocate", now, doesn't it?

      --
      It is, it is, a glorious thing to be a Pirate King!
    13. Re:God by bwt · · Score: 2

      Didn't the 9th Circuit just rule that Godzilla was unconstitutional?

    14. Re:God by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      Where's he [God] going to get the lawyers?

      What's the opposite of Devil's Advocate?

    15. Re:God by satanami69 · · Score: 2

      It's only when the people stop and notice they are "one nation, under Godzilla", right before he steps on them.

      Refer to this comic for more details.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    16. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you read Job, Satan is God's prosecutor. And the Holy Spirit is his public defender.

      Would you really want to go up against THAT team?

    17. Re:God by donutello · · Score: 2

      I don't think God will have a case there. There's plenty of prior art to indicate that the concept was made up by humans before he even existed.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    18. Re:God by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      More like:

      Sorry, but the road to hell is paved with [lawyers that had] good intentions.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    19. Re:God by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      That's easy, he lets a recently dead lawyer into purgatory (as opposed to hell) in exchange for representation.

      --
      Nice Marmot
    20. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't he Jewish? I'm sure he can find a lawyer.

    21. Re:God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GoJira in Japan

  10. Uh oh! by egg+troll · · Score: 1

    Looks like someone woke up Monster Island!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Uh oh! by SquadBoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Man: I now pronounce you President of these United --
      Reporter: Stop the inauguration! I just discovered our President Elect
      got an F in second grade gym class!
      [crows gasps; Lisa is handcuffed]
      Man: In that case I sentence you to a lifetime of horror on Monster
      Island. [to Lisa] Don't worry, it's just a name.
      [Lisa and others are chased by fire-breathing monsters]
      Lisa: He said it was just a name!
      Man: What he meant is that Monster Island is actually a peninsula.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:Uh oh! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Man: What he meant is that Monster Island is actually a peninsula.
      I believe that "man" was "Lenny" from the power plant... Another great Lenny-ism:

      "Ow, my eye! The doctor said I wasn't supposed to get pudding in it!"

      We now return to our regularly scheduled conversation...

      --
      Who did what now?
  11. Not sure if this matters by smileyy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but the term "Mozilla" has been associated with Netscape for a long, long time, even before the open source project. In fact, you're likely to see "Mozilla" in most user agent strings, even from non-Netscape browsers.

    --
    pooptruck
    1. Re:Not sure if this matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think they're too late on "Mozilla". It's practically entered the public domain at this point since it's used all over the internet. They did have legitimate grounds back when Netscape was selling the Mozilla dragon stuffed animal doll (I have one). It looks like Godzilla.

      Too late suckers.

    2. Re:Not sure if this matters by john82 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that other 'zilla has been kicking butt and taking names since what, the '50s? The question I have though is what took so long to state a claim to the name? Does anyone know if Toho, et al, have said anything the first 40+ years to protect the TM?

      Do we start a contest to rename Mozilla now?

    3. Re:Not sure if this matters by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 2

      That may be true, but that isn't going to change this guy's stand. Godzilla has probably been trademarked for at least 50 years (not that i've checked) and Mozilla has probably not even been in use for 10 years. That being said, Godzilla will certainly have the advantage in regards to time...Mozilla will need to prove that it doesn't actually infringe.

    4. Re:Not sure if this matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's practically entered the public domain at this point "

      Tell that to AOL/TimeWarner.

    5. Re:Not sure if this matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A date-guided search on google groups showed this as the first case linking 'netscape' and mozilla' in October 1994.

      Clear case of prior art (or whatever is the equivalent in copyright law)

      11-oct-1994:
      Mosaic Communications Corp.
      http://home.mcom.com/people/mtoy/
      "It's spelled 'Netscape', It's pronounced 'mozilla'"

  12. Pre-order? by realmolo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Godzilla vs. Davezilla vs. Mozilla? When is that coming out on DVD? Can I preorder it from Amazon.com? I hope they sub it. I hate dubs. By the way, I've already got some bootleg resin kits of all 3 monsters, if anyone is interested.

  13. Wowzilla. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's fuckedzilla. Izilla hopezilla theyzilla don'tzilla comezilla afterzilla mezilla.

    1. Re:Wowzilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we meet in person? An insight like that should be rewarded with a donkey punch.

    2. Re:Wowzilla. by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      Yousa sounds like Jar-Jar.

    3. Re:Wowzilla. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      That's fuckedzilla. Izilla hopezilla theyzilla don'tzilla comezilla afterzilla mezilla.

      that sounds like a new weird accent for another annoying Star Wars character... Hey George, you listening to this?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    4. Re:Wowzilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What a bunch of Bozillas.

      Will they go after the beginning part of Godzilla? Will they write cease-and-desist letters to people who read the Bible?

      "Sorry, but you can't use the word God anymore in any reference to any supernatural deities bigger than a human and possibly capable of wreaking havoc amidst a city filled with skyscrapers, since we've trademarked the word Godzilla."

    5. Re:Wowzilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something really needs to be done about that stupid message rating system. It has sucked so much lately that one don't even bother to login anymore, or write a serious message.
      Do like most people to, write something you might think that someone will find funny and you chances of getting rated up is much better than writing something with substance. I want a new site with more focus on serious messages than all the noise.
      Sure, a joke here and there are great, but rating the above as +5 is just plain stupid.
      Maybe a limit that a message only can get one + rating as funny. I don't know, but these comments here are becoming less worth reading. I remember when I took the time to read many of the messages written to a topic, but these days, I just check /. a couple of times each week to see if I have missed any headlines elsewhere.

    6. Re:Wowzilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You damn right. Look, a Bozo nose!

    7. Re:Wowzilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good riddance! Don't let the door hit you on the ass on your way out.

  14. For the love of God, Timothy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you feel the need to slashdot the Internet Wayback Machine? It's slow enough as it is.

  15. zilla != Godzilla by Fastball · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By their claim, Microsoft would be able to file suit against Microtek, Micron, Micromedia, Microware, ... I can see where there is an argument against the reptilian logo, but to parse letters in a non-profit project's title goes too far.

    1. Re:zilla != Godzilla by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Troll

      Your argument is somewhat rediculous. "Micro" was used before Microsoft, and has a meaning. Micro, was usually associated with computer terminology. Micro has a definition as something that is 1e-6.

      Zilla means nothing, and is only used in Godzilla.

      Quit reaching, and admit its a good claim. Sure, going after a non-profit project is low down, but its still in their rights.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:zilla != Godzilla by jelwell · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mozilla is not a non-profit company. See the bug I filed bugzilla, bug 70249 - "Mozilla.org should become a non-profit Organization.". Mozilla is a wholey owned subsidary of AOL Time Warner. Don't be fooled by the smoke and mirrors. Netscape still owns the copyright on Mozilla and owns the Mozilla.org website.

      There's been no activity on the bug for some time.

      You definately have a good point about names, I don't think they have a foot to stand on when it comes to the name alone.
      Joseph Elwell.

    3. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but "Big Lizard, like the one used in Mozilla" == Godzilla.

    4. Re:zilla != Godzilla by corwinss · · Score: 1

      Actually, by their claim, Microsoft would be able to sue any of these corporations who use a logo which has something in it which resembles a window.

      Oh, wait - they have a box in the background? sue them.
      Their application runs in a window? for shame, sue them
      Their building has windows? *gasp* sue them twice

      While you were reading this post, your computer has been taking over by the ABLCM (association of blind little coding moles).
      have a nice day

      --
      "Who am I" and "Why are we here" are not the problems.
      The problem is when someone asks "Why are they here."
    5. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla isn't non-profit you ass gobbler.

      It's owned by media giant AOL/Time-Warner.

      The majority of the developers are paid employeers of said corporation.

      The code is open to speed research and development without having to pay all contributors. Not for a case of the warm fuzzies.

      Sure it's open source but it ain't non-profit.

      Not that it's bad, but let's get real here.

      Developing a browser for the biggest baddest most-lobbying-congress-for-the-dmca media company isn't close to non-profit.

    6. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is AOL/Time-Warner a company lobbying in favor of DMCA, CBTPA and copyright extension a non-profit?

      They just opened the code to get developers to work for free.

      What like AOL/Time-Warner never sued someone over something less than this?

    7. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're such a sad sad troll, Knox.

      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=zilla
      A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs

      http://www.kar.nic.in/bellary/
      Bellary Zilla Panchayat is a three - tier Panchayat raj system with elected bodies at the Grama, Taluka and District levels constituted as per the 73rd amendment to the constitution for greater participation of the people and more effective implementation of rural development programs (and to function as units of local self government). The Zilla Panchayats were constituted as per the provisions of The Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

      Google will give you the rest of the story.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    8. Re:zilla != Godzilla by John+Hasler · · Score: 3


      Quit reaching, and admit its a good claim.
      Sure, going after a non-profit project is low
      down, but its still in their rights.

      Trademark is not copyright. They have to prove that potential customers of theirs are likely to confuse the mark Mozilla with their Godzilla mark. Fairly difficult, I think. As to the image, pictures of lizards and dinosaurs have been around for a long time. The fact that they have not complained before this will count heavily against them, too.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      Actually;

      Zilla: n. 1. A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.


      Zillah: n. 1. A district or local division, as of a province. (SE Asia)


      Quit acquiescing to this extension of the boundry of IP and insist their copyright is for Godzilla; The guy in a lizard suit. Period. End of Godzilladamned paragraph.

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    10. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Microsoft = Microcomputer-Software. They'd have a hard time enforcing either the suffix or the prefix I'd imagine.

      --
      What?
    11. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ya your right!

      I'm sure the mozilla name and big bad lizard logo where inspired by a three tier Panchayat raj system and not godzilla...

      shea ok.

      Get real you dip.

    12. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 0, Troll

      Is it difficult to be as stupid as you are or do you have to work at it?

      Clearly you didn't even read any of the parent posts?

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    13. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Frobnicator · · Score: 2
      Zilla means nothing, and is only used in Godzilla
      Untrue. Zilla in ENGLISH has no meaning. Zilla or Zillah DOES have meaning in other languages, such as Arabic, and could be considered a suffix. Several US companies have taken the Arabic 'zillah' as part of their name, for example.

      The word sounds interesting and was made popular by the Godzilla series, and then it became abused by a number of companies. That does not mean that Godzilla owns that particular series of letters.

      As for their claim that Davezilla was using their name "GODZILLA", that would be a problem. (although he claims he did not.) Finally, as to their claims of ownership of the image, we would need to look at their trademark registration to see if the two images really are confusing (that's up to a Judge, if Davezilla wants to do that).

      frob.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    14. Re:zilla != Godzilla by BlackGriffen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Problem is that the reptilian logo looks more like either a t-rex or a velociraptor than a guy in a cheesy costume.

      BG

    15. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you? what the fuck does a three tiered panchayat raj system have to fucking do with this story you offtopic wanker?

    16. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2
      Your argument is somewhat rediculous. "Micro" was used before Microsoft, and has a meaning. .....

      "Windows" has had a meaning before Microsoft as well (In the computing field, even), but that didn't stop them from going after the "Lindows" people.

      There's reason, then there's laws. Then again, there's lawyers.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    17. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Plus one is a fictional movie monster, and the other just crushed Tokyo, er, is a webbrowser.

      Trademarks are unique to markets.

      So with that, and them not defending their mark for the 10 years that N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, pronounced Mozilla has been around, I don't see how they have a case.

    18. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, so AMERICA On Line/Time-Warner is an arabic company?

      Neat, so the name mozilla was inspired by an egyptian shrub?

      Ya your right it has nothing to do with Godzilla.

      Also in Arabic logos of a big lizard that looks like godzilla means egyption shrub too...riiight...

      Stop being apologists for AOL/Time-warner.

    19. Re:zilla != Godzilla by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

      Yea, that's right. And for all those folks out there who have been infringing on my own intellectual property, let it be known from now on; I will be requiring licensing fees for anyone using MadFarmAnimalz as a prefix to anything.

      This goes too for my other nicks, namely RancidAmoeba and DromedaryOfWar.

      Cease and desist.

      --
      Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    20. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a japanese company decided to create a product called Metscape and use a big M as the logo wouldn't get sued by AOL/Time-warner?

      "oh but it just means metropolitican landscape"

      This is so pathetic.

      "But scape is used in so many places!"

      Oh puh-lease.

      Slashdot is so corny.

      Remember AOL/Time-Warner is a big mean pro-CBTPA company. Actually they are one of the biggest lobbiest for this. So when they rip off a name and logo from a japanese company you rush to defend them.

      Slashdot is just so pathetic.

      Try to not be hyprocritcal for one day please.

    21. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the fuck does a three tiered panchayat raj system have to fucking do with this

      Ya that's exactly what the judge is going to say if some moron tries to use that sad defense in court.

      AOL can easily pay off these guys anyways, shit AOL could probably just buy the company that owns the rights to Godzilla anyways...

      AOL will just take a couple million out of the "Lobby Congress for CBTPA Fund" and toss it to these japanese gentlemen and that will be the end of it.

    22. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They own the character.

      Netscape got popular by using the fame of a character they invented/have the rights to.

      So it's fair to say that they should have gotten a cut of mozilla's direct/indirect profits to AOL/netscape etc.

      Also, you cant use someone else's trademark even if you're not profitting from it.

      And as for parsing the name for similarities.. trademark holders are allowed to .. if the name sounds similar and it attempts to gain fame/benefit by using your innovation .. you deserve to be compensated.

      If a soda company uses the name Coka Kola written in a very similar font to Coca Cola's and packages their product in a can thats a slightly different shade red as Coke's can, thats trademark infringement, because they are obviously trying to push their product off the fame of coca cola. Not to mention the fact that some consumers may think it's the same product.

      Sorry that's just the way it is.
      It's not fair to people who come up with new and improved shit otherwise.

    23. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron! Unlike 'micro' which has meaning outside of the context of Microsoft, 'zilla' and words suffixed with 'zilla' would have absolutely NO MEANING to anyone anywhere without the Godzilla franchise.

    24. Re:zilla != Godzilla by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Please, compare the usage of "micro" vs. the usage of "zilla" in the English and Japanese languages.

      Again, this is another reach and wouldn't hold up in court.

      You're such a sad sad troll, Knox.

      Troll v., n.:
      [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it.

      My post was just an argument on the parent, seeing it as an over-exaggeration (or oversimplification) of the truth. There is no "baiting" except to say I thought it was 'rediculous'. I should of figured someone would look it up in a dictionary to find a definition, regardless of how rarely it is used.
      But, hey, you got a moderator to follow you!

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    25. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft would be able to file suit against Microtek, Micron, Micromedia, Microware"
      That's where you're wrong... Microsoft fears the grandaddy of all lawsuits from Microwave!!

    26. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again zilla does mean something. It is a plant.

      zilla

      \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    27. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By their claim, Microsoft would be able to file suit against Microtek, Micron, Micromedia, Microware, ...

      FOR GOD'S SAKE MAN, DON'T GIVE THEM ANY IDEAS!!

    28. Re:zilla != Godzilla by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      Zilla means nothing, and is only used in Godzilla.

      You are so wrong.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    29. Re:zilla != Godzilla by kavau · · Score: 1
      And most importantly - MS could file a suit against the whole SOFTware industry! Imagine that: only MS is allowed to call their products software, all other software is a trademark infringement on their name!

      Oh, and... what about MICROwave? NOOOOOO!!!! Bastards!!! Everything but my microwave!!!!

    30. Re:zilla != Godzilla by T-Ranger · · Score: 2
      Nope, not at all..

      The Trarnasaurs Rex-ish character related to the netscape browser is "mozilla". Its the name of the browser, and its the name of the character as well.

      "Mozilla" was proposed as the name of the (browser) by JWZ sometime before Sunday, 5 August 1994 according to his diary at jwz.org..

    31. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      To quote your own post:

      "Zilla means nothing, and is only used in Godzilla."

      I proved you wrong. I never said one thing about the merits of the case. I simply and quite quickly pointed out to you that Zilla does not, in fact, mean "nothing."

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    32. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      Jesus Christ you are blind:

      "Zilla means nothing, and is only used in Godzilla."

      Bam. 2 uses in seconds.

      THAT was my point you moron. Knox runs off at the mouth, gets proven wrong and then comes back with you and your friends to lay some smack down. Typical slashdot troll

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    33. Re:zilla != Godzilla by alienmole · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with your bug is that there's not a developer alive who can fix that one, no matter how 1337 their coding skillz may be...

    34. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're such a sad sad troll, Knox.

      Written by you.

    35. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      Wow! You can read, Knox.

      And it's still 100% true. But your trolling, thank goodness, says nothing on the merits of the case, just on your lack of intelligence.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    36. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you did a "dict zilla" in the console, you are such a fucking big genius.

      You should be a lawyer i'm sure your arguement will really hold up in court.

      moron.

    37. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 2, Funny

      Trarnasaurs Rex

      This must be among the most hilarious misspellings in the history of Shlashdot.

    38. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 1

      Oh well. I guess I should just stay quiet if I can't spell Slashdot...

    39. Re:zilla != Godzilla by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      but that didn't stop them from going after the "Lindows" people

      It also didn't stop them from LOSING the court case.

    40. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      What's so funny is that you still don't get it. Even though I've never once mentioned the merits of the case, you keep going on and on. And as anon too because your Karma must be sooo important to you.

      How pathetic.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    41. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla.org is not a wholly owned subsidiary of AOL/Time Warner. Netscape is a wholly owned subsidiary of AOL/Time Warner, mozilla.org and Netscape are not the same thing. Mozilla is at best a division of Netscape, but in reality it's not even that.

      Mozilla and Mozilla.org are nothing but a marketing/branding names to distinguish between the open source version of a browser and the Netscape branded (open source + propritary extensions) version.

    42. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you looked up some obscure definition of zilla in the dictionary! Whoopty fucking do for you, no one gives a flying fuck you tard.

    43. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was refering to the zilla part of the name mozilla and godzilla you dumb ass.

      He was comparing the the zilla part of mozilla with the micro part of microsoft not zilla by itself.

      If you take ism off the end of something it may or may not mean anything but what in the fuck does that have to do with the whateverism that is being discussed.

      You sir a slashtarded fuckwit.

    44. Re:zilla != Godzilla by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      fyi, I don't post anonymous.

      For someone who spots trolls, you fare poorly.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    45. Re:zilla != Godzilla by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Knox runs off at the mouth, gets proven wrong and then comes back with you and your friends to lay some smack down. Typical slashdot troll

      I don't normally reply to comments like this (especially cause I see it as a troll and/or flamebait), but you are living in an imaginary world, here, full of conspiracy theories and paranoia. First, I'm not a troll (otherwise I don't think I'd have nearly as many fans and people reading my journal). Now, the friends that I have that read slashdot don't comment, and call me silly for commenting. So I can assure you that none of my "friends" would reply anonymously (and especially not in that manner).

      The only troll here is you (and the statement I quoted from you at the beginning of this schpeel is the bait). If you are, in fact, trolling, feel free to congratulate yourself and rub my nose in it for replying.

      Otherwise, drop it. I don't see why you argue with anonymous cowards. They are just trying to get you angry (and have succeeded, it seems).

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    46. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the mozilla lizard is clearly a T-rex.

      Godzilla is a completley madeup monster.

    47. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from the accounting records, as a wholly owned subsidiary of AOL Time Warner, Mozilla.org is a non-profit organization in the sense that there's no profit.

    48. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Peter+Harris · · Score: 2

      Exactly though. zilla doesn't mean godzilla either. If godzilla is the trademark, *zilla isn't.

      But isn't the name of the fire-breathing monster actually GOJIRA? Japanese doesn't even have an L, for a start. So unless you spell Mozilla àç, you're probably OK.

      In any case, NO NO NO NO NO. It's a cynical, bogus claim.

      If Toho go after AOL Time/Warner I hope they (Toho) get slapped down hard in court rather than succeed in getting an juicy out-of-court settlement.

      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
    49. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      Why do you continue this lie? You're the 8 year old who's standing next to the broken lamp saying you had nothing to do with it.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    50. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      Of course people give a flying fuck. You do because you've posted how many responses now? I think it's great that you care so much, it proves my point perfectly.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    51. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause I am not Ft. Knox, you sad cunt. Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go thru life, son.

    52. Re:zilla != Godzilla by cetan · · Score: 2

      Well, I know it's not but you continue to live that way. Do you just like the irony or is it a lack of a frontal lobe?

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    53. Re:zilla != Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hereby recommend the following: http://users.pandora.be/p0p0/youare.swf

    54. Re:zilla != Godzilla by welshsocialist · · Score: 1
      So with that, and them not defending their mark for the 10 years that N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, pronounced Mozilla has been around, I don't see how they have a case.

      No so. Mozilla has been around for 4 years.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  16. Gonna be a great movie! by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

    Godzilla vs Mozilla!

    Complete with terrible english dubbing.

    1. Re:Gonna be a great movie! by McD!ck · · Score: 1

      LOL!
      (SONG LYRICS)
      Oh no! There goes Toho!!
      GO GO MOZILLA!

      --
      People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
  17. Godzilla is no match for.... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1
  18. In other news... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 0, Redundant


    In other news, God is suing Toho for for appropriating his name into the name of their monster.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  19. No more Green Mozilla. by jelwell · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is one of the reasons there's no longer a green Mozilla logo, nor can you buy Mozilla dolls anymore. The owners of godzilla came down on Mozilla long ago.
    joe.

    1. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      " This is one of the reasons there's no longer a green Mozilla logo,"

      Then I must be color-blind. I keep on seeing a green, fire-breathing lizard on the splash screen whenever I start Moz. And there's another green lizard delivering mail when I start Moz mail.

    2. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by oyenstikker · · Score: 2

      I still see the fire breathing green dragon when I start Mozilla 1.somethingorother

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    3. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word : upgrade.

    4. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Then I must be color-blind. I keep on seeing a green, fire-breathing lizard on the splash screen whenever I start Moz.

      Yeah, that has confused me too... I thought green Mozilla character comes from Netscape, and red Mozillas come from mozilla.org, and these two are enturely separate organizations... I wonder why they're using the wrong lizard in the win32 splash screen and some theme parts? =/

    5. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by styrotech · · Score: 1

      I keep on seeing a green, fire-breathing lizard on the splash screen whenever I start Moz

      I'm no expert, but didn't the real Godzilla have a frosty breath?

    6. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by BZ · · Score: 2

      That's a gecko. It looks nothing like the green Mozilla logo.

    7. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      I've always imagined an IE logo being in the path of the flame... but I guess that'd cause Mozilla some legal issues too ;-)

    8. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by brank · · Score: 3, Informative
      No.

      Mozilla has always (well, almost always) used a red dinosaur instead of Netscape's green lizard. Somebody probably considered the trademark thing at some point, but the switch was made only to make it clear that Mozilla.org was a separate entity from Netscape. If Netscape the company ever started using Mozilla as its mascot again, it would still be green.

      --
      it's green.
    9. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be confused with GEICO.

    10. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      Microsoft would bluster, but it would be perfectly legal.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    11. Re:No more Green Mozilla. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A stocky biped with scales, claws, and a spiked ridge down its back, breathing fire. Right, it must be a gecko.

  20. Reply by 0101000001001010 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was in the middle of typing a sensible and well thought out reply about the extent to which the Godzilla trademark should be protected from ripp-offs. Then I realized that the situation can better be described in one sentence.

    What a Dick!

    1. Re:Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were in the middle of typing that sensivle thought out reply, but then your Mozilla decided to enjoy some Opera and spontaneously crashed, like the open-source piece of bullshit that it was.

    2. Re:Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er.. that was a lady that sent the mail. Don't you mean "what a wretched puss-filled cuntsack?"

  21. Wher's the link by bafreer · · Score: 0
    you have so many links for so many things! which one leads to the story?!?

    Oh, and thanks for pointing out that mozilla.org is mozilla, cute.

  22. Confused by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    I don't see how anyone could be confused - Godzilla attacked Tokyo, while Mozilla is going after Redmond, WA.

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    1. Re:Confused by armyofone · · Score: 1

      Where in any of this is Toho threatening Mozilla mentioned?

      It's not. But, as has already been mentioned, this is a way to set a precedent. First, fry the small fish, then go after and try to fry the bigger fish - err - I guess that would be lizard in this case.

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    2. Re:Confused by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      welcome to slashdot, you must be new here. I can answer your question with 2 words:
      Wild Speculation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Confused by Shagg · · Score: 2

      welcome to slashdot, you must be new here.

      Well, not really.

      Wild Speculation.

      That's what I thought, but since www.davezilla.com was slashdotted I wasn't sure if he was involved in Mozilla any, or if it was a totaly unrelated case and people were just doing the "jumping to conclusions" thing with Mozilla being next in line.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  23. Name confusion? by Rellik66 · · Score: 1

    I doubt anybody would get the names Mozilla and Godzilla confused

    --

    Too many zeros, not enough ones

    1. Re:Name confusion? by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      Mo vs. God

      I have this mental picture of a three stooges character trying to eye-poke God.

      Funny what the mind comes up with after so many hours of work...

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    2. Re:Name confusion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You overestimate the average person's intelligence. I've met many people that would confuse them.

  24. too late? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla has been used for a very very long time. Isn't it too late for those godzilla guys to protect thier trademark?

  25. Rook out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Godzirra is coming!

    1. Re:Rook out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fa ra-ra-ra-ra ra-ra-ra-ra!

    2. Re:Rook out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, those movies weren't the same without Darren McGavin.

  26. They'll probably go after my Friend Dave by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 1

    He's got a monster 528 cubic inch motor in his Buick. It runs the 1/4 mile in under 10.2 seconds on street tires.

    He calls the car "Buzilla".

    Personally, I think he should have a right to; the car is, after all, a monster.

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
    1. Re:They'll probably go after my Friend Dave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well I have a Datsun with a GODZILLA in it! It pulls 9s.

  27. Too Late by nathanm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mozilla's been around for what, about 4 years? If this company sat around for that long without defending their trademark, too bad! Any rational, impartial judge (if they exist) would throw this out of court.

    1. Re:Too Late by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla has been around for much, much longer. Probably as long as Netscape Navigator exists.

    2. Re:Too Late by derinax · · Score: 1

      Toho would need to go all the way back at least to Zilla, the distributed computing app for NeXTstep from 1989. Though in that case there may not be anyone left to sue.

    3. Re:Too Late by aengblom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not neccesarily true. WWF (The world wildlife fund) just recently won the exclusive rights to it's abbreviation over the WWE (formely World Wrestling Foundation... now World Wrestling Entertainment)

      As WWE campaign famously says "get the F out" ;-)

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    4. Re:Too Late by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

      A perfect example of why no "rational, impartial judge" exists. Exclusive rights to an acronym? Please. That was ridiculous.

    5. Re:Too Late by lunenburg · · Score: 1

      ITYM "formerly the World Wrestling Federation," jabroni. :-)

    6. Re:Too Late by John+Hasler · · Score: 2


      Exclusive rights to an acronym? Please.
      That was ridiculous.

      No, just British. British trademark law is a bit different from that in the US.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Too Late by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      The World Wildlife Fund has been hassling the WWE for years about their trademark. The dispute was only *settled* recently, but the WWF brought it up years ago, so it's not like they only recently decided to challenge the WWF.

      However, I'm not sure if the WWE's change was due to a court decision, or a private settlement.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    8. Re:Too Late by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

      Being British relieves it of it's ridicule?

    9. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WWFs actually had an out of court settlement about the trademark WWF and its use worldwide. Recently the Fund started saying the Wrestling was violating that agreement and decided to try and get the trademark totally.. I believe this was actually part of the agreement that the Fund had the power (as the Wrestling knew that they would win any court battle because they are much older) to fully grasp the trademark if they could prove in court that the Wrestling was violating the agreement... so it is an odd mix of in court and out of court settlements.

    10. Re:Too Late by edwdig · · Score: 3, Informative

      The World Wildlife Fund first complained in the early ninties. The World Wrestling Federation made a bad move, and agreed to a contract not to use the initials outside the US. They had no intentions of honoring that, they just signed it to shut up the wildlife fund. Eventually the Wildlife Fund sued over it, and recently won in court do to that old contract.

    11. Re:Too Late by Kobal · · Score: 1

      Yup, but there was a possible confusion between WWF and WWF as everything coming out of either one is completely bogus. Mozilla and Godzilla is a completely different matter.

    12. Re:Too Late by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      No, but its a bit of an excuse. After all, they are British!

      (I'm a Canadian, so I'm allowed to make that kind of joke. Eh. ;) )

    13. Re:Too Late by plugger · · Score: 1

      Being British relieves it of it's ridicule?

      Unfortunately not. Oh, you're talking about IP laws? I thought it was just general chit-chat!

      (I'm from the UK btw, just couldn't resist the joke).

    14. Re:Too Late by bwt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed, Netscape filed for trademark protection for the term "Mozilla" on 7-July-1995, under serial number 74698316.

      However, since 18-July-1997, the status has been "An opposition is now pending at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board." There has not been a resolution and so "Mozilla" is not a registered trademark.

    15. Re:Too Late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Interestingly, it took me a long time to come to even realise "WWF" was not "World Wildlife Fund". I've known about (and donated to) the WWF (wildlife fund) since I was small, but I never heard about the "World Wrestling Foundation" until many years after. I would get confused when people talked about "WWF" relating to wrestling. I don't live in the US though, and we never got "WWE" here until recently.

      So in my mind at least, WWF should rightfully belong to world wildlife fund. But personally, I don't see why BOTH shouldn't just be able to carry on using it. Who really cares? Were people continually accidentally donating money to the wrestling foundation or something? I hardly think so.

    16. Re:Too Late by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Exclusive rights to an acronym? Please. That was ridiculous.
      Not at all. Any lawyers out there who want to try to talk the Boy Scouts of America into suing the Business Software Alliance? Pretty please?
    17. Re:Too Late by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > Mozilla's been around for what, about 4 years?

      Longer than that. Since the mid 1990s at least. I don't know
      when the red trex logo was first introduced, though; that may
      have been more recent.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    18. Re:Too Late by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      Nothing relieves IP law of its ridicule.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  28. wtf by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

    Can they even do this? I wasn't aware you could sue someone for using a mark that was partially similar to your own trademark.

    Secondly, there have been a lot of -zilla named things in the past. Did the owner of this trademark try to enforce it then? Or when Davezilla.com was registered back in 1999? Or when the Mozilla name first came into use by Netscape and, later, the Mozilla project? It seems to me that "zilla" is pretty diluted and was not enforced in a timely fashion.

    I'm certainly no trademark law expert, but this whole thing just screams of silliness to me... But then again, most trademark suits do.

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
    1. Re:wtf by sh00z · · Score: 1
      I wasn't aware you could sue someone for using a mark that was partially similar to your own trademark.
      Happens all the time. Don't go sticking an "R Us" onto the tail end of your business name.
  29. God forbid! by brooks_talley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel so sorry for this poor company. Having one of their trademarks lightly referenced in the context of the open source vs. Microsoft battle. Thus keeping the mark in front of not only geeks, but a fair amount of the mainstream as well. Thereby increasing interest in their Godzilla properties, and generally entrenching the -zilla suffix in the not only english, but other languages as well.

    It must be terrible for them, all that free publicity.

    Of course, to retain control of the trademark it might be necessary to come to some licensing agreement, but trying to stamp out the use of -zilla is a serious case of shooting oneself in the foot. Hormel wised up about Spam; you'd think these folks would learn from that example.

    Cheers
    -b

    1. Re:God forbid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free publicity? Are you on fucking crack? How many people in the world have heard of Godzilla? Now how many people give a rat's ass about open source? See how one of those numbers a lot less than the other?

    2. Re:God forbid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must be terrible for them, all that free publicity.

      Actually, I am certain they quite like the publicity. This is exactly why they are rasing a stink over the issue. If there was no conflict, there would be no story, and therefore nothing to publicize.

  30. Pure BS by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

    I wish that people who need money would do something creative with their trademark(s) instead of spending all of their time trying to do something as uncreative as sueing someone who is both doing no harm to them and doing something creative.

    As far as the Mozilla part goes, what cave was Godzilla sleeping in that he just became aware of it?

    I wonder if BOC is next, or is that how they fell of the face of the earth?

  31. Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by LordNimon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slightly off-topic (or maybe not), can anyone tell me how I can get Mozilla for Windows to display the Japanese characters?

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. You need a real browser to do that.

    2. Re:Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by David_W · · Score: 1

      Assuming you have a Japanese font installed, it should "just work." You might have to pick View->Character Coding->Auto-Detect->Japanese for it to figure out you are viewing a Japanese page (i.e., if the character set is incorrect).

      If you don't have the Japanese fonts, in Win2K go to the "Regional Options" Control Panel and check Japanese as one of the languages your system should support. This should cause it to copy the fonts from the CD (IIRC).

    3. Re:Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      View--->character coding

    4. Re:Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by MsGeek · · Score: 2

      What, you mean THIS real browser? It displays in just about any alphabet you want except Elvish, without any stressing about language packs. And there's no "-zilla" in the name, either! Konqui kicks butt.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    5. Re:Displaying Japanese characters in Mozilla? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does. Go to Mozilla.org and search for i18N.

  32. Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What's next? Yahoo! coming down on Philip J. "Pud" Kaplan (of FuckedCompany.com fame), claiming that his new Yahotties! site somehow infringes on their trademark?

    Can that be far behind?

    1. Re:Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice trolling, pud. As you all know, Yahoo already wrote the cease-and-desist letter, but apparently pud feels the need to get some attention here.

  33. also by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

    The gecko from Geico insurance is getting hassled again by email.

    1. Re:also by Fjord · · Score: 2

      The lizard is in turn suing the Mozilla group for trademark infringment on the naming of their rendering engine.

      --
      -no broken link
  34. double doh by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

    First the lawyers go after after the domain name, now his hosting company/ISP is going to get tweaked about the bandwidth-using slashdotting....

  35. Here mozilla stopped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Godzilla said
    You are mozilla, not a gorilla
    The big one talked.

  36. More Links Please! by saider · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can You please insert some more links into your article. on slashdot?

    I don't think I can possibly do all the background research myself.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  37. No Ground to Stand On by bafreer · · Score: 0

    Mozilla wasn't formed from godzilla, maybe the logo at the most. It came from "Mosaic Killer" or Moz-illa.

    1. Re:No Ground to Stand On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla wasn't formed from godzilla, maybe the logo at the most. It came from "Mosaic Killer" or Moz-illa.

      That might be true, but you don't think Godzilla had anything to do with it? Yeah right...

    2. Re:No Ground to Stand On by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're fucking wrong.

    3. Re:No Ground to Stand On by DevNull+Ogre · · Score: 1

      I don't think etymology has anything to do with trademark law. All that matters is if the infringing mark could be confused with the trademark by a reasonable person. It doesn't matter how the infringing mark was created.

      (IANAL--Hey, this is Slashdot)

  38. I think the Roman Catholic Church by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    should go after Toho for using the word "God" in Godzilla without permission from His Holiness.

  39. so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla is a clear ripoff of Godzilla. Where do they get off?

  40. Slashzilla by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

    It seems that davezillas server is saying "No Slashzilla, no!!!!"

  41. BIlling Software by hoagieslapper · · Score: 1

    I guess my company is next. Our billing software is titled billzilla.

  42. Forget Mothra... by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...we need Robert Smith of The Cure to save us now. Nothing like a good ol' roshambo to settle this dispute.

    1. Re:Forget Mothra... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      If necessary, I guess we could go with Leonard Maltin or even (gasp!) Barbra Streisand!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    2. Re:Forget Mothra... by seanmeister · · Score: 2

      dangit, you owe me a keyboard!

      Robert Smeeeeeeeth... Robert Smeeeeeeth.....

    3. Re:Forget Mothra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't get it. But I can't help but laugh and half-wish I did.

    4. Re:Forget Mothra... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      Oi, leave fat bob out of this.

    5. Re:Forget Mothra... by istewart · · Score: 1

      MECHA BAR-BAR-AH STREI-SAND!!!

      'nuf said, even though she's annoying otherwise.

    6. Re:Forget Mothra... by AIM-9X · · Score: 1

      It's spelled "rochambeau" - FWIW.

      --
      ***
      This is my Sig. This is my Glock, this is my Walther, and this is my Beretta.
      Any questions?
    7. Re:Forget Mothra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disintegration is the best album ever!!!

    8. Re:Forget Mothra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Search Robert Smith South Park for the episode titled "Mecha Barbara Striesand". 1st season I believe.

    9. Re:Forget Mothra... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dangit, you owe me a keyboard!

      I don't get it. Did you cover it with man spunk at the mere mention of Robert Smith's name? Damn, I said it again, you probably blinded your sister.

    10. Re:Forget Mothra... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      What we really need right now is Matthew Broderick..

    11. Re:Forget Mothra... by thrashncarry · · Score: 1

      Megaaaaa Poitier! Megaaaaa Poitiahhhhhh!!!

  43. New name / mascot needed. by Hobart · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recommend the Mozilla project change its mascot to another cute character ...

    Something more approachable, but still computer related ... a mouse would do nicely...

    Since the original name was derived from Mosaic, and the NCSA project is shelved and Spyglass is no more, "Mosaic Mouse" would do nicely...

    OK, sing it with me...

    Who's the browser, Open Sourced, that's made for you and me?
    M O S - A I C
    M O U S E!
    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
    1. Re:New name / mascot needed. by thenightfly42 · · Score: 1

      You should be plenty safe with this one. Disney has never sued anyone for soundalikes...

    2. Re:New name / mascot needed. by archen · · Score: 1

      what ever happened to the gecko anyway? Although I admit I was sort of confused to what the bluish green thing was, for a windows icon, I eventually figured out it was supposed to be a gecko. I even got sort of attached to it. Then I upgrade to mozilla 1.1 and what do I get? This ugly red decapitated dinosaur head in a box. Can't they change it to like... a fat penguin or something?

    3. Re:New name / mascot needed. by Val314 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but Lucas could sue because Mos Aic just sounds like Mos Espa ;)

    4. Re:New name / mascot needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Disney has never sued anyone for soundalikes...

      Woah, that was a Disney joke?

      I'm glad you're here to point that out, I thought it was totally original!

      Boy, is my face red!

    5. Re:New name / mascot needed. by amlutias · · Score: 1

      that was a shrimp. a krill.

      a seamonkey, which was what the milestone releases were called.

    6. Re:New name / mascot needed. by kiddailey · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Thank you.

      Thank you.

      That made my day :)

    7. Re:New name / mascot needed. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      The Zetans would sue for using the Krill name then.

    8. Re:New name / mascot needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wondering about that for quite a while. But one question: why blue? Did they feel it was overdue, and portray it as a stale, nay rotten, shrimp?

    9. Re:New name / mascot needed. by JahToasted · · Score: 2

      Of course we all know the owners of the Mickey Mouse trademark are much less litigous than the owners' of Godzilla when it comes to intellectual property.

    10. Re:New name / mascot needed. by Zekat · · Score: 1

      All your mouse are belong to us!

      --
      Mmm, donuts.
    11. Re:New name / mascot needed. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      er... this is a krill? Nope...

    12. Re:New name / mascot needed. by Genrou · · Score: 1
      Something more approachable, but still computer related ... a mouse would do nicely...

      Agreed! Since it should be computer related, why not make him an electric mouse? Yellow seems to be a good collor, and I think that some electricity sparks would look great. I don't quite agree with your choice of name... Maybe something like... Pikazilla?

  44. Not a big deal. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In this case, they claim that he actually used the "Godzilla" name, and the image of a Godzilla-like creature. I think that his biggest mistake was not attributing the owners of the trademark he was 'using', and not including something like "used without permission", or "appologies to the {I for get the name} -- owners of the Godzilla trademark".

    For the most part, however, I doubt that people would think that dave was endorsed by the Godzilla trademark owners. Less so, Mozilla which doesn't actually use the "Godzilla" name. There's nothing wrong with parody, or flattery by mimicry. I don't think that there's much reason for fear, as long as the Mozilla group doesn't try to branch into the horror-movie genre.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    1. Re:Not a big deal. by macdaddy · · Score: 2

      I think the kid said he hadn't ever used the "Godzilla" name though. So he has a domain name with 5 common characters in it and a lizard on his website. I don't think there's much of a violation there. Now if he blatently ripped the image from the official Godzilla homepage or something then yeah I'd say he's SOL. I think if he could afford to stand against Toho, he'd win fairly easily. The cost of ligitation would still suck though.

    2. Re:Not a big deal. by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2

      The letter claims that he used the Godzilla name and a reptilian image of some sort on his site. If that's not true, then they've got a REAL flimsy suit against him. Probably just some under-utilized lawyers on a make-work binge.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  45. Shouldn't apply to Mozilla by The+Ogre · · Score: 1

    I don't know about davezilla, but mozilla should be ok. IANAL, But I thought trademarks had to be agressively defended to "stay fresh" - mozilla.org has been around since 1998 (at least), and the netscape browser's been called mozilla for longer than that, in public. I'd say letting it slide for 4+ years is an indication that they have *not* been defending this trademark, at least in this arena...

    -- the Ogre

    1. Re:Shouldn't apply to Mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally trademark only holds for a particular realm of commerce. Thus it is possible to have for example "moonbeam", apply to a light bulb and also have another copmany use it for a chicken feed. The law generally will decide that two products are by their nature sufficiently distinct that there is no chance of confusing one use of the trademark with another. That is why when you register a trademark, you must state its purpose and limits. You can't say "I have dibs on all uses of this word".

  46. Davezilla.com by xkenny13 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Here is the text from Davezilla.com:


    Sun, 11 August, 2002
    Goodbye little dragon guy!
    [Blog] - Davezilla @ 07:07:43 pm
    re: DAVEZILLA.COM
    Dear Mr. Linabury:

    We represent Toho Co., Ltd ("Toho") in intellectual property matters. Toho is the owner of all rights in and to the trademark and service mark GODZILLA and the GODZILLA characters. In addition, the name "GODZILLA" and the likeness of Toho's GODZILLA character are federally registered trademarks belonging to Toho. Copies of Toho's U.S. Registrations for GODZILLA and the GODZILLA character image are enclosed.

    [Omitted long, dull paragraph about the history of Toho...]

    It has come to our attention that you have incorporated the "ZILLA" portion of our client's GODZILLA marks in the name of your "DAVEZILLA.COM" domain name, and that you have included a "reptile-like" character as well as a "monster-like" character, which you refer to as "GODZILLA", on your website accesible through "DAVEZILLA.COM." Please be advised that your use of the GODZILLA mark constitutes a trademark infringement and confuses consumers and the public into believing that your "GODZILLA" character originates from Toho, which it does not. Moreover, your use of the "ZILLA" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "DAVEZILLA.COM" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client, and demonstrates an attempt by you to trade on the goodwill built up by our client. As such, we request that you remove the objectionable imagery and reference to GODZILLA from your website to eliminate any likelihood of confusion and posibility of an inaccurate affiliation with Toho and GODZILLA.

    We look forward to receiving your prompt reply, with a statement of your intentions, no later than August 16, 2002. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

    Very truly yours,

    SEYFARTH SHAW

    Jill A. Jacobs

    Wow. Guess the little dragon at the top has to go bye-bye. At least they are letting me keep the domain name. A few inaccuracies: I have, until today, never mentioned Godzilla, nor do I have any imagery of him on this site. Nor do I refer to my logo as Godzilla. It's always been. "That little dragon guy." Could have been a lot worse. Expect a new banner this week and changes to the colophon.

    1. Re:Davezilla.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I truly believe that Davezilla.com is associated with a low, thorny desert plant. Suffrutescent... well, that's a little strong.

      zilla
      \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.
      Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

  47. DIS suxors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the Japaneses are cool peps.

    1. Re:DIS suxors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya that's why it's to bad that a media giant like mozilla owner AOL/Time-Warner thinks it can just rip off their creations.

  48. Strange by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    I always thought godzilla was old japanesse methology? Is it really a recent creation of a corperation? Or did someone at the trademark office just not care.

    1. Re:Strange by wantedman · · Score: 1

      Nope. Godzilla is a combination of two words

      Gorilla and (don't Quote me on this)Lizard.

      Although the Japanese do have myths that somewhat feel like they could be used to derived Godzilla, there isn't a direct connection.

    2. Re:Strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that word combination appeared when thee movie was imported into the U.S. The real name of the monster is "Gojira"...

    3. Re:Strange by BJH · · Score: 1

      Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt! Wrong.

      One theory says that the name came from "gorilla" + "kujira" (=whale), but that was thought up after the fact.

      The real origin of the name is the "Gojira" legend from Otojima, an island near Japan.

    4. Re:Strange by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

      BJH wrote:

      > One theory says that the name came from "gorilla"
      > + "kujira" (=whale), but that was thought up after
      > the fact.

      According to the textbook "A Critical History and Filmography of Toho's Godzilla(tm) Series" by David Kalat, the initial idea for Godzilla started out being a mutated octopus. Then it was designated simply with the letter "G" for giant. Finally, the name "Gojira" (derived as you said) was suggested to Tomoyuki Tanaka (the G producer from 1954-1995) and he approved it. Before the fact.

      The mutated octopus did get to guest star in "King Kong vs. Godzilla", but only in a minor role. The actor (a real octopus in a tank) was eaten after his performance.

      > The real origin of the name is the "Gojira"
      > legend from Otojima, an island near Japan.

      Yee, do you ever have that mangled! The island's name was "Oo too" ("Oo shima" on modern maps, "oo" means a long "o") English name would be "Big Island". The island is part of Japan, and the gatekeeper to the Sagami Sea. Godzilla has to pass it on the way to Tokyo Bay. Mount Mihara, in which Godzilla was imprisoned from 1984 to 1989, is located on the island.

      The Gojira legend was in the movie "Gojira". I don't know if that part was based on reality (except for the "exorcism" appearing to be a Shinto ceremony). However, the Japanese religion of Shito does have a god of fire whose birth destroyed his mother. That god's name is Kagu-tsuchi. In "Mothra vs. Godzilla", the Infant Island chieftain refered to the hydrogen bomb a "godly fire".

      Kagu-tsuchi has a younger half sister, the goddess of the sun born of the sea, who taught her people how to cultivate rice and weave silk (created from the cocoons of the silk moth), Queen of the gods, to whom the Japanese people pray yearly for peace and happiness: Amaterasu omi kami => Mothra.

      He also has an even younger half brother, the chaotic god of storms, thrower of temper tantrums, associated with multi-headed dragons, causer of grief to his big sister: Susa no oo => King Ghidora.

      If you've ever been to one in Japan (or read about them in G-fan), you'd know that when Toho puts on a display of Godzilla props in a department store in Japan, an essential ingredient, the first exhibit, is almost always a small Shinto shrine to the Dreaded God of the atom: Godzilla.

      Yes, Virginia. There is a real Godzilla. There is a real King Ghidora. But thankfully, there is also a very real Mothra!

      "Compassionate Sun, Sun Goddess, Great Mothra! Great Mothra! Mothra!"
      Japanese language "Mothra's Song", "Ebirah, Horror of the Deep"

    5. Re:Strange by BJH · · Score: 1

      Yee, do you ever have that mangled! The island's name was "Oo too" ("Oo shima" on modern maps, "oo" means a long "o") English name would be "Big Island". The island is part of Japan, and the gatekeeper to the Sagami Sea. Godzilla has to pass it on the way to Tokyo Bay. Mount Mihara, in which Godzilla was imprisoned from 1984 to 1989, is located on the island.

      Er... no. The island is 'Ootojima' (), written "Large Door Island". Ooshima is a completely different island. See here for further info.

  49. Certainly by jmweeks · · Score: 1

    I can see, seeing how Mozilla is in the film business and the action figure business and generally in competition with Godzilla, that yeah, they have some sort of case here. Sure, guys.

  50. too far by skidgetron · · Score: 1

    Another example of how copyrighting has gone way to far. Seriously, do you think anybody really associates mozilla with godzilla, or think that it has any sort of affiliation with it? What does it really matter? Just another corporation trying to sue the little guy for a buck.

  51. Partially similar? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Can they even do this? I wasn't aware you could sue someone for using a mark that was partially similar to your own trademark.

    I don't know, but you can definately sue for using a mark which is completely similar and partially exact.

    1. Re:Partially similar? by retsrof · · Score: 1

      +1 ROTFLMAO funny
      Somebody report this man!

  52. Like fucking a rusty muffler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing stupider than this lawsuit are the thousands of slashdot readers who are trying to make teh Funny.

  53. more like by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Slashdot getting ready to stomp davezilla.com

  54. Next on the agenda... by thecampbeln · · Score: 1

    Every Xvale and Xville will sue each other claiming they were the first with the suffix... York will take New York to court for infringing on it's originally suffix...
    And ING Investments will charge a royalty to everyone using "ing" at the end of a word (shit, I guess I owe them for 3 payments already!).

    The plaintiffs should just claim their referencing the plant or the disease!

    --
    "1984" was ment to be a warning, not a guidebook. You hear that Kim Jong-il!? BushCo?!
    1. Re:Next on the agenda... by McD!ck · · Score: 1

      This whole suffix th[EDITED BY ING Investments] is really gett[EDITED BY ING Investments] out of hand! Companys will sue anybody for anyth[EDITED BY ING Investments]. Guess we are just go[EDITED BY ING Investments] to have to deal with it. . .

      McD

      --
      People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
  55. Davezilla RIP by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted approx 20020813 1900UTC. We hardly knew thee.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  56. Oh Shit by aozilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    My nick is in trouble.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    1. Re:Oh Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderate it 1, Funny!

  57. I thought Godzilla was a Dinosaur by kontos · · Score: 1
    What ever happed to the likely to cause confusion part of the trademark laws.
    I see the problem if Davezilla or Mozilla were making cheesy monster movies, but in a totally unrelated industry, what's the complaint?

    There goes my idea for Godzilla Demolition, Inc.

    --
    SM MBL-VIR looking 4 SIG 4 LTR. must be DDF, no 420, SD ok.
  58. Not going to fly. by mesozoic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's going to be a stretch for Toho to prove what it needs to prove: that Mozilla is infringing on a trademark. The words 'Godzilla' are not used anywhere, and the logo is of a different shape and color than Godzilla (it looks more like a T-Rex than anything else). The suffix 'zilla' and the presence of a reptilian image is not enough to shut down a software project. If it were a movie, however, this would be a different issue.

    I'm not a lawyer, though, so anyone with a legal education and a better angle on the subject, feel free to correct.

  59. Mozilla and Godzilla vs. Godzilla and God by thelenm · · Score: 1

    Mozilla is a trademark infringement on Godzilla just as Godzilla is a trademark infringement on God. Now there's a three-way fight I'd like to see. :-)

    --
    Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
    1. Re:Mozilla and Godzilla vs. Godzilla and God by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      thelenm wrote:

      > Mozilla is a trademark infringement on Godzilla
      > just as Godzilla is a trademark infringement on
      > God. Now there's a three-way fight I'd like to
      > see. :-)

      "God" is a general term for deity in the English language. There are anglo-saxon deities worshiped before Christianity who could sue the Christian deity for trademark infringement.

      Besides, it's pronounced "go-dzi-lla" not "god-zil-la". And Godzilla is a god.

      Godzilla is the King! Godzilla is the God!
      The Power and the Price of godly flame we stole!
      The fire from the atom's heart bears a terrible price:
      Godzilla is... Our Nuclear Nightmare!
      (From my lyrics to the instrumental "G-Proximity" from "Godzilla X Megagiras".)

  60. What ever happened to "tradespace"? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, I'll grant you that calling something ".+zilla" and using a dinosaur/dragon-like logo is probably coming close to violating a Godzilla trademark.

    But what ever happened to the concept of a restricted space within which trademarks are (were?) supposed to operate? I had understood that trademarks were only protected within the same general "realm" of a product -- which is how we've got Excel cars and Excel spreadsheets.

    It's seemed to me, with the advent of the modern internet, that all these distinctions have been thrown away, and that the courts are allowing that diminished distinction. So Palm has to stop calling their Pilot a "Pilot" because a pen company complains.

    Does anyone know what exactly is the deal here? Have domain-name disputes finally opened the door for a single, universal, all-encompasing product namespace?

    If someone wants to call their browser Mozilla (or even Godzilla), then they should be able to, because the chances of someone confusing a web browser with a big lizard are pretty darned slim.

    Or have I misunderstood this aspect of (US) trademark law all along?

    1. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by unDiWahn · · Score: 1

      Nah, you're right, if there's no competition between the markets, there's no problem.

      _EXCEPT_, and this is big, you're causing defamation to an established trademark.

      Godzilla is very established, and by using a trademark (Mozilla, reptile) that is so similar they're indirectly diminishing the Godzilla trademark. Whereas everyone though "giant reptile, Oh Godzilla" before, perhaps now some people think "reptile, zilla, oh the browser".

      Or something like that.

      Hey, I'm not a... ah screw it.

    2. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe TooHo were planning on releasing a Godzilla based IE5/6 skin theme!

    3. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nolo Press has a good book about trademark law.

      Once a trademark becomes famous there's a different set of rules that come into play. Even before the Internet you would have had major grief if you'd tried to sell cars or stereos labeled "McDonald's".

      What the Internet has been eroding is the concept of a regional trademark, under which there could be a Foobar General Store in Iowa and other in Nebraska.

      Words to search for include "dilution", "secondary meaning", and "famous mark".

      If you really need to know about a legal question consult an actual lawyer.

    4. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Once a trademark becomes famous there's a different set of rules that come into play. Even before the Internet you would have had major grief if you'd tried to sell cars or stereos labeled "McDonald's".

      "McDonald's Used Cars" would be fine if you'r last name is McDonald...

    5. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "McDonald's Used Cars" would be fine if you'r last name is McDonald...


      But not if you used a variation on the Golden Arches logo as well. The problem here - and, it's worth remembering, this is a putative problem as Toho hasn't actually sued Mozilla - is that you have the combination of "Mozilla" and a big looking lizard logo.

      The Davezilla thing just seems like a mess-up on a over-zealous lawyers part, as he's got confused between davezilla and a Godzilla fan site that's stolen some images.
    6. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tradespace" didn't go anywhere. Godzilla's lawyerzillas will argue it doesn't apply in this case, and Davezilla's lawyerzillas will argue that it does. And the judgezilla will decide.

    7. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Zordak · · Score: 2

      If my name were Bob McDonald, and I wanted to open McDonald's Steros, and I had a store logo that had nothing to do with yellow arches (say it was a blue neon sign with cursive lettering), I'd be willing to take on McDonald's over my right to use that name. On the other hand, if my name were Jim Smith, and I started McDonald's Hot Dogs with a stand in the park, and I spelled it with curvy, yellow lettering, and I had an obnoxious clown trying to attract children to my hot dog stand, then yeah, they'd probably sue me, and rightly so.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    8. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Odinson · · Score: 2
      Does anyone know what exactly is the deal here? Have domain-name disputes finally opened the door for a single, universal, all-encompasing product namespace?

      Yes, it makes MS's smart tag server DBA's life much easier. He is currently disgruntled over MS stock option losses and thinking of leaving.

      Life is better with no more of those pesky "in context, trademark violating, superimposed link" lawsuits from those "other" companies.

    9. Re:What ever happened to "tradespace"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I'd be willing to take on McDonald's over my right to use that name.

      You'd be willing to spend a million dollars in court? You _know_ you'd be relentlessly sued, right?

  61. Another 'zilla to pester by TrinSF · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they'll go after the product of one of my former employers, Go!Zilla. It used to have a more lizardy logo, but now it only has big eyes.

    As a lark when I worked there, I once arranged for us to buy a number of 6 foot inflatable Godzilla dolls, which we dressed in company t-shirts and abused. We also had "I love the lizard!" logo tshirts.

    But that was a long time ago and the company is gone now; only the product remains.

    1. Re:Another 'zilla to pester by Coplan · · Score: 2
      Company or not -- the product is still being updated by someone, is it not? When a download is complete, it even growls at you in the trademark sound.

      Mozilla or Go!Zilla...which is more of an exploitation?

      What about the component names: Seamonkey? Do they still sell those awful things? Will they try to sue Mozilla too? Or don't they have enough money to do so? Maybe we don't have to worry there.

    2. Re:Another 'zilla to pester by TrinSF · · Score: 2

      Actually, I don't think it *is* being updated. I know the FAQ hasn't been updated since I stopped doing so in January of 2001. As far as I know, all the programmers originally on the project have long since moved on.

    3. Re:Another 'zilla to pester by Coplan · · Score: 1

      Hrmm...that could be why I stopped using it last may. I miss the program...but it did start acting wierd on me. I had to put it out of its misery.

  62. They will have to sue ... by Galahad · · Score: 1
    these guys too:
    --
    --jdp Maintainer of VisEmacs
  63. Almost every graphical web browser... by Omega · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Almost every graphical web browser's User-Agent string starts with "Mozilla/4.0". So unless they go after Opera, AOL and Microsoft, then they aren't adequately defending their trademark -- hence they no longer own exclusive rights to the trademark.

    1. Re:Almost every graphical web browser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's obviously not the opinion of those who made the davezilla decision.

    2. Re:Almost every graphical web browser... by BlowCat · · Score: 2
      However, only Mozilla project uses this name to promote the project. Others simply state that they are compatible with Mozilla. Netscape could have gone after them, but they didn't. Now if AOL loses the Mozilla trademark, it will be a very interesting question whether Microsoft and others will have to drop "Mozilla compatible" from their browsers.

      Basically, if you steal and give away stolen goods, those who get those goods have to return them. I wonder if it applies to trademarks.

    3. Re:Almost every graphical web browser... by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      While I disagree with their tactics in everyday business, I can say that it would be extremely funny to watch this company go after Microsoft.

      Microsoft Lawyer: "Your honor, we've taken the liberty of creating Godzilla using advanced cloning and dna-manipulation technology. He's just as big, just as mean, and of course, breathes fire. We feel it only fair to alert the people of Japan he will be on his way over should this ridiculous trial proceed any further."

      Toho Lawyer: "We must flee!"

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:Almost every graphical web browser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --oh no, there goes Tokyo, go go Mozilla. Couldn't resist, as I am listening to Godzilla from Soft White Underbelly, err, Blue Oyster Cult.

  64. Good luck.... by Frobnicator · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Just run a google on "zilla", you get...

    Go!Zilla, nomo zilla, :Zilla Clothing, My Zilla, Budgie-ZILLA, ZILLA sports, TrafficZilla, WebZilla, and even a thorny plant named Zilla

    So they have lots of legal battles if they want. (Watch them claim that the thorny Zilla plant stole their ideas of a thorny reptile...)

    frob.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:Good luck.... by xkenny13 · · Score: 2

      Not sure if it's on a search engine or not, but there's also http://www.missbobzilla.com/.

  65. somewhat similiar by reactor · · Score: 1

    This vaugely reminds me when Nintendo was sued over their use of the Kong in "Donkey Kong" by the owners of King Kong. If I remember correctly, Nintendo won the case.

    1. Re:somewhat similiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, Nintendo won... because the copyright for King Kong had already expired when they made Donkey Kong. Since Gojira (1954) is still copyright protected, that case is not relevant to this.

  66. Right and Wrong by jaymzter · · Score: 1

    First off, I find it difficult to believe that anyone could see the 'Mozilla' name and logo, and not immediately associate it with Godzilla. I think they're right on that score. However, to make the next jump, and assume TOHO is putting out a web browser to beat MS is just too far for me to attempt. Isn't it good enough that when I think of Godzilla I get a good feeling and say, "Those TOHO guys sure were cool..." Apparently that is not the end result of what they want people to think about them. Lastly, who the HELL gave them rights to PART of a word? If AOL can't browbeat the GAIM guys down, how can TOHO?
    Oh yeah, $$

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    1. Re:Right and Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing I think is "WFT? What does that red lizard thing have to do with cheese?"

      Then I read the name more closely

    2. Re:Right and Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you forget that trademark names get diluted over time. Ever use kleenex, velcro, or windows? Well they all have been diluted.

  67. conceptual resources are also limited. by des09 · · Score: 1

    how long before we run out of global namespace? Theer was a recent Slashdot on running out of copywritable melodies, but I cant find it...

    --
    .sigless since 2003
    1. Re:conceptual resources are also limited. by des09 · · Score: 1

      As an aside, Microsoft doesn't own the rights to Internet Explorer

      Running out of phone numbers, bar-codes, melodies, and trademarks. I suddenly feel like the work has become a whole lot smaller, Thank godzilla we'll never run out of bugs!

      --
      .sigless since 2003
  68. Well that's just stupid... by rocjoe71 · · Score: 1

    Gozilla was a Tyrannosaurus Rex and Mozilla is clearly a Tenontosaurus.

    --
    Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
  69. Original version by Salsaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sun, 11 August, 2002, war begining !
    Goodbye little dragon guy!
    [Blog] - Davezilla @ 07:07:43 pm
    re: DAVEZILLA.COM
    Dear Mr. Linabury:

    What happen ? Someone set up us the trademark infringement ! Take off every 'zilla' ! You know what you doing.

    For great justice,

    SEYFARTH SHAW

    Jill A. Jacobs

    1. Re:Original version by n9hmg · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sure. I'll join in the ethnic stereotypes, and make a jingoistic confusion between Japan and China - All your zilla are belong to us.

    2. Re:Original version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Aren't Zero Wing and Godzilla both from Japan? You PC nutcase.

    3. Re:Original version by blackula · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Shut up you fucking nip gook chink.

  70. This could be some serious revenue by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    Just look at all the lawsuits waiting to happen.

  71. Awful name by Animats · · Score: 2, Troll
    Maybe it's a good time for Mozilla to get a name that would look good on a mass-market product. Maybe go back to "Mosaic"? Yes, it's possible to succeed with a dumb name, but it takes a really big advertising budget.

    And would someone please help out the Ogg Vorbis people?

    1. Re:Awful name by glwtta · · Score: 2

      oh great arbiter of name quality, would you concede to... aw fuck it - Ogg Vorbis is a great name!

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Awful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed it is. It stands out. It's hard to forget.

      Those things = good.

    3. Re:Awful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ogg Vorbis is a very sexy name, much so than em-pee-three, mind you.

    4. Re:Awful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they need to change it to something soft and fruity. How about Navigator. No... no... Explorer. Mmmm no, too gay. Oh... how about Rover?

    5. Re:Awful name by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      And would someone please help out the Ogg Vorbis people?

      OK, OK, just call it Oggzilla. Now they should be able to get some free press from Toho sueing them too.

    6. Re:Awful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ogg Vorbis is such a stupid fucking name. If they are trying to be unpopular... its working.

    7. Re:Awful name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno, everyone I've ever suggested the Ogg Vorbis sound scheme to has said something to the effect of "WTF?" at the mention of the name.

      They don't even remember it, since I nearly inevitably get an email from them days later saying "I tried to find that Dog Orbits thing you were talking about."

      Great sound scheme. Crappy name.

  72. Bzzt by john82 · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the fine folks at IMDB, Godzilla made his first appearance in the movie Gojira in 1956. Also consider that the court hearing this will likely be in Japan where Godzilla is a cultural icon (and monster movies as a whole). First round to Mister Godzilla.

    1. Re:Bzzt by nathanm · · Score: 2

      Which one appeared first is irrelevant to this discussion. In order for a trademark to remain valid, its owner must defend it against every infringement they're aware of. Mozilla is well known and AFAIK this is the first Godzilla's owners have even raised the issue. The 4 year period of inaction signals they aren't serious about keeping their trademark.

    2. Re:Bzzt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozillz is NOT well known. It's well known within the tech industry and with power users. The average man on the street will have no clue what Mozilla is if you ask him.

      Common usage, and common usage within an industry are two different things.

    3. Re:Bzzt by nathanm · · Score: 2

      We're not talking about common usage here. Mozilla is known well enough that a corporation trying to protect its so-called intellectual property would have been aware of it for quite some time.

      If this were to go to court, the burden of proof that they just recently heard of Mozilla would be on their own shoulders. If they can't sufficiently convince a judge of this, and sat around for 4 years without challenging Mozilla, it would be promptly thrown out of court.

  73. A Proposed Solution.. by President+A.+Lincoln · · Score: 1

    Step 1) Buy some fireworks Step 2) Buy some model cars & tanks Step 3) Dress up CowboyNeal in a giant Tux costume Step 4) Film CowboyNeal stomping on a model of Toho Inc.'s Corporate HQ, in slow motion. Step 5) ..... Step 6) PROFIT!!
    Yes, I am the real Abraham Lincoln.

  74. Zany_vanilla.equals("zilla") by elocutio · · Score: 2, Funny
    Other things that could have originated the form "Zilla":

    Zoo Gorilla

    Zeus Pilla

    Shortening of Priscilla

    Z-Index Layers Lose All

    ZILch LAtitude

    Zero Internet Lan Lag Access

    I like creative names, and if a product name happens to pay homage to a famous fire-breathing dinosaur, so be it. Besides, Mozilla sounds a lot cooler than Moceratops or Morannosaurus or Mobarney.

    1. Re:Zany_vanilla.equals("zilla") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote MOBARNEY

    2. Re:Zany_vanilla.equals("zilla") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually those are pretty cool.

    3. Re:Zany_vanilla.equals("zilla") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or even MOsaic kILLA...

  75. it'd be a useful endaround by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if Microsoft happened to be in bed with Toho

  76. A quick search for 'ZILLA' on Google reveals... by raindrop#1 · · Score: 1

    Go!zilla, Nomo zilla, Zilla clothing, For my Zilla, Bellary Zilla Panchayat, Zilla Design, Shimoga Zilla Panchayat, Godzilla (some way down the list, unfortunately for Toho...), Budgie-Zilla, Zilla Sports, Cafe Electric - home of the Zilla, Zilla, Trafficzilla.com, Web-Zilla, Davezilla (even further down the list), and so on for "about 120,000" results.

    Looks like them lawyers going to be mighty busy

  77. It's Gojira you moron by mocm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The zilla is only a relict of a misleading transcription of the ji syllable which is the soft form of shi (or si) in the alternate trasncription.
    Anyway, the zilla could be an allusion to jirasu (to irritate) ;-)

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:It's Gojira you moron by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      It would be within the Linux/open-source idiom, in any case, out "out-authentic" the trade-mark holders by going to "Davejira" and "Mojira", respectively.

      --
      2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    2. Re:It's Gojira you moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Depends on your romanization system. The way I was taught (Temple U), "zi" would be perfectly correct. If you've been into anime for a long time, you may have old fansubs of various Gundams that read "Jion" instead of "Zion," which has other connotations. That's why Bandai went with "Zeon" when the released it here. ^_^

    3. Re:It's Gojira you moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, there are two sounds equivalent to "ji" in the phonetic systems (hiragana and katakana), one from shi (si) and one from chi (ti), which would correspond to zi and di if these sounds existed in Japanese. (there are ways to write them in katakana for foreign words) AFAIK, the sounds are identical (so I guess technically there's onle one, but there's two ways to write it), but one form is used almost exclusively. (from shi? I forget.)

  78. Bootsy's next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lookout Bootzilla, da man is commin ta bring the TM smack down on tha funk!

  79. Western Digital is also screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Western announced on thier webpage that they have the new Drivezilla 200gb hard drive...will they get thier arses sued as well?

  80. Godzilla vs. Bambi by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Classic animated short. Did they go after the guy who made that? Anybody know?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  81. not that it matters these days... by Lxy · · Score: 2

    But Zilla is a dictionary word.

    You'd think they'd get the hint after Microsoft unsuccesifully sued Lindows, claiming that they owned anything ending in "indows". If M$ can't do it, how is another company going to?

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  82. Toho's Mistake by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    See, they didn't name Mozilla after a Japanese movie monster, they named after a certain Blue Oyster Cult song. Big difference! :)

  83. they cant copy right godzilla by dcstimm · · Score: 1

    they can only copyright godzira because japanese cant pronounce Ls

  84. Watch out Washington Capital fans... by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

    The Capitals' goalie Olaf Kolzig has a nickname of 'Zilla'. Something to do with his furious temper. He even has a picture of a dinosaur demolishing a city, with the word 'zilla' just below his facemask.

    --
    Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  85. Dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zilla

    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

  86. Meaning of "Godzilla" by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 1

    I found an interesting tidbit about the origin of the name "Godzilla." It seems to be a combination of two Japanese words translated awkwardly to English (like trying to read an Excel 97 spreadsheet in Excel 2000).

  87. Did I miss something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see anywhere in this story where anyone says anything about Toho coming after mozilla, that is pure speculation. This is not a story.

  88. Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by sterno · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's the thing. Trademark requires that the holder of the trademark actively defend their mark. If they do not do so and it falls into common usage, it's too bad so sad for the trademark holder. So, even if you successfully argue that Mozilla infringed on Godzilla (are these really confusingly similar?), the judge will ask why they have let it exist for the past 10 years without questioning it.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but we all know that most of the leveraging, actions, and reactions happening in the world today is in no way connected to reality and legality - the world is run on threats now.

      You know what that is? Stupid. It means its become more efficient and cheap to succumb to threats than to see issues through to their proper and (I can't stress this enough) correct conclusion. I have no feelings either which way in this case; what frusterates the FUCK out of me is that we'll likely never get to see who's right, in court.

      Personally, I'm waiting for the laywer industry to reform its traditional garb and start dressing more like jocks and repo men.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      Here's the thing. Trademark requires that the holder of the trademark actively defend their mark.

      Yeah, well, they are far too late.

      'Godzilla' is a song by Blue Oeyster Cult that is a good twenty-plus year old.

      'Mozilla' is the name of a browser that has been in widespread use since at least the mid-nineteen nineties.

      'zilla as a suffix has been used in colloqual English for at least as long.

      If they were going to complain about the likes of Davezilla or Mozilla, they should have done so eight years ago, before the terms came into common usage, not after.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    3. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by mpe · · Score: 2

      Here's the thing. Trademark requires that the holder of the trademark actively defend their mark. If they do not do so and it falls into common usage, it's too bad so sad for the trademark holder. So, even if you successfully argue that Mozilla infringed on Godzilla (are these really confusingly similar?),

      Also trademarks, at least originally, were tied to both product area (hence you have both Apple Computers and Apple Records) and geography. AFAIK the browser people arn't making monster movies, set in Tokyo or anywhere else.

    4. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by plugger · · Score: 1

      But it isn't in common usage. Mozilla is not a generic term for web browsers, a huge number of internet users probably don't even know it exists.

    5. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

      > Also trademarks, at least originally, were tied to both product area
      > (hence you have both Apple Computers and Apple Records) and geography.

      True, but I believe you'll find that Apple Computers made a licensing arrangement of some sort with Apple records. I think it was recently mentioned when some of Apple's multimedia tools/features were thought to maybe violate the "non music" clause in the original agreement... then again, I could be wrong.

    6. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by Kindaian · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. Since Mosaic if memory doesn't fail me. And that is way to far away in time!

      The fact that some sites don't perform browser identification it is of no value for the question at hand.

      For reference of a case like this there is the "Samba" scuffle that happened in Germany where a sleasy lawyer tryed to "defend" a german trademark for "Samba"...

      Cheers...

    7. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by rlwhite · · Score: 2, Informative

      They have to actively defend it against much more than Mozilla, rather anything else that infringes the trademark. The situation looks pretty awful for Toho.

    8. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by Gaccm · · Score: 2

      you're totally right, but in this 1 case, look who owns Mozilla. Something tells me that AOL might have a few lawyers lying around.

      --

      Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    9. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by plugger · · Score: 1

      That makes for an interesting question.

      The browser ID string usually includes 'mozilla', but that string is commonly used by machines, not people. Does common usage refer to communication between people, or any usage?

      But I still maintain that Mozilla is not a generic term for webbrowsers. I wasn't on the net in the Mosaic days, but did people at the time refer to a web-browser as 'a mosaic'? I am under the impression that common usage means that a name has become a generic word for a class of things. If I asked Windows using friends about the SSL vulnerability in their Mozilla, they would give me a blank look.

    10. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by foonie · · Score: 1
      from here:
      1989

      Apple vs Apple: Apple Records, the record company created by the Beatles, sues Apple Computer for getting into the music business. According to Apple Records, the computer company violated a secret 1981 agreement that let Apple keep its fruit logo -- as long as it didn't have anything to do with music. By 1989, however, the music and PC worlds are already coming together.

      The two Apples will later settle, with the computer maker paying the record company.
    11. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by Slak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to mention the fact that trademarks extend only to references of the word or phrase with respect to a certain "trade". This is why Microsoft isn't able to sue glass-pane makers over the term "Windows".

      AFAIK and IANAL, Toho is going to have to prove that *zilla is in the same "trade" as Godzilla.

      Cheers,
      Slak

    12. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by lparsons · · Score: 1

      I don't think they have been doing much to protect the "zilla" portion of the name. Try searching for "zilla" on google. Go!Zilla?!?! How many others? It's a while before there is even mention of GODzilla...

    13. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by bdesham · · Score: 1
      This is why Microsoft isn't able to sue glass-pane makers over the term "Windows".
      *groan*

      Please, don't give M$ any ideas...
      --
      Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
    14. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by bay43270 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      exactly. Search google for "zilla". The results show just how well they've defended their trademark.

    15. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      'Godzilla' is a song by Blue Oeyster Cult that is a good twenty-plus year old.

      Yes, and I understand that Blue Oyster Cult didn't see very much money from it, because of all the licensing fees they paid for the privlige of using the trademark.

    16. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think trademarks is "intellectual property" [sic] done rather right. At least how I understand the system.

      First, it serves a noble purpose. Its basically a law saying that its illegal for a company to be intensionally deceptive to its consumers.

      Second, the companies have to regularly defend their trademark until its lost.

      On the otherhand, you have copyright. While it may serve some noble purpose to all those starving writiers (note: most of the writers are still starving), its being used against the public at large. In addition, you can just copyright something and forget about it. In fact, you don't even have to copyright it--its just copyrighted.

      Wouldn't it be nice if copyright expires every five years or so? So that if the author truly doesn't want an exclusive right to copy, then his copyright expires. If he wants his copyright, then he would have fill in a form or something, to reapply for his copyright.

      Note, IANAL and make mistakes about the law regularly.

      (on a side curiousity, does the acronym 'IANAL' mean anything legally? Would a judge care that that acronym is there?)

    17. Re: Actually time advantage is to Mozilla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wasn't on the net in the Mosaic days, but did people at the time refer to a web-browser as 'a mosaic'?

      For all intents there was really only one web browser at that time unless you were being perverse or trapped on a text terminal. So there was also no need for genericity.

  89. Nonsense by sys49152 · · Score: 3, Funny
    be advised that your use of the GODZILLA mark .. confuses consumers and the public into believing that your "GODZILLA" character originates from Toho

    Nonsense, everyone knows that Godzilla originated in the depths of time and crawled out of the Pacific after the U.S. nuked the Bikini Islands.

    Moreover, your use of the "ZILLA" formative ... is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "DAVEZILLA.COM" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client

    This is what is known as a portmanteau word. That is a word that conveys meaning by using parts of other words that have definite associations. Words such as smog (smoke and fog), or, more inline with davezilla, monicagate (Monica and Watergate), infomercial (info and commercial), and Linux (Linus and Unix). Whether this can be construed as trademark infringement is somebody else's call, but I rather think that The Almighty (God) and Homer (Trademark holder of the monster named Scylla) might have something to say about this.

  90. Lindows by d3xt3r · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If Lindows is a not a trademark violation, than certainly neither is Mozilla.

    Mozilla has nothing to do with Godzilla. Godzilla is a fictional character, Mozilla is a web browser and a user-agent. The term "Mozilla" as a user-agent has been around since the early days of Netscape. My guess is that any attempt to sue the Mozilla organization for trademark violation would be laughed out of court.

    1. Re:Lindows by coyote-san · · Score: 2

      That's not a good analogy since many people felt that the "Windows" trademark should have never been granted in the first place (it's too close to a term of art, "graphical windowing system," and an existing product, "X Window System"(*), and confusion was inevitable.)

      In contrast, Godzilla has only referred to a specific set of horror movies and they can legitimately claim a trademark on the name of their monsters. As others have pointed out, the claim on "-zilla" is too extreme and flies in the face of a decade or more of common usage.

      (*) Before the MS astroturfers bother to "correct" me, Gates announced Windows 1.0 shortly before the first *commercial* release of X Windows. But X Windows had been in use in academia and elsewhere for years by this point, and you couldn't actually by the POS Windows 1.0 until about 2 years after the announcement (and it was close to a decade before the first practical and commercially successful version of Windows was released.)

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    2. Re:Lindows by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      Godzilla is a fictional character, Mozilla is a web browser and a user-agent. The term "Mozilla" as a user-agent has been around since the early days of Netscape. My guess is that any attempt to sue the Mozilla organization for trademark violation would be laughed out of court.

      Rename Mozilla to Mickey and give it a logo that is a 4 fingered hand see how long before Disney jumps in. It doesn't really matter if ultimately you think it will be laughed out of court. Its the cost of getting it that far that often decides these things. How far can Mozilla afford to go with this?

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
  91. Toho is infringing on the catholic cash cow's name by Clockwork+Apple · · Score: 1

    I mean if they can sue over the use of the zilla suffix, couldnt the major religons sue over use of their GOD icon? This really sucks. They want to be a household word like any franchise does, but they dont want us to use it as such. I would say this is crossing the Fuck You threshold.

    I have been a fan of the big green lizard since i first saw the american version of the original film, but thats all over now. I gave up on Star Trek when they started going after fan sites in the 90s. what the hell is the world coming to?

    --
    "Doctor, it's not the voices I hear in MY head, but the voices I hear in YOUR head that really frighten me."
  92. YRO? by farnsworth · · Score: 1

    shouldn't this be filed under the "Godzilla's Rights Online"?

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  93. It's Gojira nimnertz !!!! by gelfling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The character and the movie is GOJIRA.

    God-zilla is an American Eenglish bastardization. They should at least after the right fucking phoneme.

    how rame.

    1. Re:It's Gojira nimnertz !!!! by hacker · · Score: 2

      Gojira...

      Gojirra...

      Godzirra...

      Godzilla...

      Sounds like a logical progression to me.

    2. Re:It's Gojira nimnertz !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, let's make it davejira.

    3. Re:It's Gojira nimnertz !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should at least after the right fucking phoneme.

      Missing a verb. Makes no sense.

    4. Re:It's Gojira nimnertz !!!! by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2
      The character and the movie is GOJIRA.

      God-zilla is an American Eenglish bastardization. They should at least after the right fucking phoneme.

      Just Great ... you mean they have to change the name (of the browser) to MOJIRA?? ... we have a tough enough time with Mozilla ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  94. Davezilla by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    doesnt matter if he is using the logo or name or not - the /. effect will prevent people from seeing any of his "infringments" and confusing DAVEzilla with a short japanese actor in a rubber suit knocking over bala-wood buildings.

  95. Don't forget... by gearheadsmp · · Score: 0

    ProZilla! It's a great download manager for Linux that lets you download multiple parts of a file that are lated pasted togethor automatically. Great for downloading those ISO's off gatech's Linux server...

  96. In other news... by Dil+NaOH · · Score: 1

    ...Toho has withdrawn its suit in federal court against Blue Oyster Cult over their use of the trademark "Godzilla" due to the fact that no one can actually recall how the song went.

    --
    Thank you for observing all safety precautions.
  97. turdzilla by T.Bickle · · Score: 1

    Man I had a huge one this morning. Took three flushes to finally dispatch the beast to the netherworld. How's that for a copyright infringement?

  98. this could have been solved ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in WW2 if we would have said "fuck you, you royal gooker" to the emperor and nuked all of that waste of a slant-eye island. the japanese are racist mother fuckers.

  99. They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    This is seriously fucked up. I'm at the point where I think its time we simply declared open season on all lawyers. At least scumbag lawyers like the ones who write these kind of letters.

    Sign up their email addresses to porn. Post their sites on portal of evil.com and watch them get trolled. Let the hack attacks begin. I'm sorry but its high time we the people put an end this the obscene litigation in this country.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    1. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by micq · · Score: 1

      as I prepare for law school in the spring... I wonder... what the hell does the lawyer in the case have to do with it besides acting on their clients behalf? you attack the lawyers for doing what they're paid to do? what do you do for a living? are you a scumbag coder who sends out crappy products because your employer pays you and tells you when to ship the product? are you a sysadmin? should we have open season on all sysadmins because you run a slow network with the resources provided to you by your employer?

      you're an idiot thinking that lawyers have all control over this when they work for someone else. mind you, there are bad attorney's out there, just like *EVERY OTHER PROFESSION* who care for nothing but the buck, but that's no reason to post against all of them.

      so damn quick to kill the messenger.

    2. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      Can I get a license from the game warden?

      Anyway, I definitely have to agree. I fail to understand why the liar ... err ... lawyers indicate that someone's site easily confuses the public with the Toho figures. This is what's sad: I used to think sue-happy corporations/individuals/enteryourleastfavoritenim rod here were essentially a past time of America. Apparently other countries have caught on quickly. Maybe the trial lawyers need to be vacated from this world and we need tort reform dagnabit. </soapbox>

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    3. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by mungtor · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm probably going to hell for this, but I agree.

      What really needs to happen in a case like this is a judge needs to laugh it right out of court, pausing only to fine the plantiff $10M for wasting peoples time.

    4. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you just hit it on the head. People have a problem with lawyers because their opinions are for sale. Lawyers are really just paid commercial endorsers.

    5. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      The problem is, lawyers should be doing what is right within the law, not firing off dubious threat letters for pay. The lawyers should have told the company that this was a waste of their time and would likely result in bad publicity. Instead they took their money and threatened this guy who has NOT DONE ANYTHING WRONG!

      I did say that one should only do this to lawyers like this, and I stand by that. After all, they *didn't* do their jobs properly and if Dave had the resources to take them this to court, I imagine a judge would have agreed.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    6. Re:They didn't sue Blue Oyster Cult did they by micq · · Score: 1

      Have you not been in the workforce long?

      You don't see that side of the story, if it did or didn't happen. Do you tell your boss that you're not going to do something because you don't see the value in it? I sure as hell wouldn't. The value is doing what I'm told, and at the end of the week, I get my fat check.

      They took the money and did what they were told. What are the lawyers by themselves gonna get out of Dave? Do you really think it's worth their time to have someone quit doing something? No. They get paid for it, and they're doing their job.

      And *NOT DONE ANYTHING WRONG* is in your eyes. It's in my eyes too, but that is partly the reason why we have the courts and professionals who practice in them. If you're going to chastize anyone, you should chastize the company. Leave the workers out of it.

      I'd hate to be your mailman when he delivers bad news.

  100. I thought it was pronounced... by LBrothers · · Score: 2, Funny

    Goh-Ziwa

    At least that's what they always said in the movies.

    1. Re:I thought it was pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was gojira.

    2. Re:I thought it was pronounced... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      No. Three letters. "go", "ji", "ra".

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    3. Re:I thought it was pronounced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raymond Luxury Yacht

  101. ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Hormonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone set us up the lame-ass joke.

    1. Re:ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for you, the moderators disagree.

    2. Re:ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess 'aybabtu' is still funny.. when done right, and every so often. This guy got it right!

    3. Re:ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't even complain properly.. it's 'someone set up us the...'

      damn, what a failure you are.

    4. Re:ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Fruit · · Score: 1

      Apparently you can't complain properly either. It's 'somebody set up us the...'

      So nyah.

    5. Re:ALL YOUR FUNNY ARE BELONG TO THE MESOZOIC ERA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "take off every zilla", however, was appropriate and related to the original script. I thought that was clever, at least.

  102. Definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ZILLA

    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    Maybe pictures of plants would be more appropriate. Same for Mozilla.

  103. Blue Oyster Cult by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    Hey, don't forget to nail these bastards for giving you TONS of free publicity!

    Oh wait, some of them are dead? Fine, the lawyers can sue their descendants!

    In fact, screw a national ID system. Every American needs a Personal Assigned Lawyer. Then we can all just have our PAL's sue each other until the entire world collapses under the weight of our beloved democratic Red Tape (TM).

    Damnit! I'm not OLD enough to be this SICK of our society yet!!!

  104. Word existed before Godzilla by sdjunky · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is Dictionary.com's definition of zilla.

    Also, consider that Microsoft didn't win againts Lindows and that's a much closer match since it even pertains to the same kind of item or good e.g. an Operating System

    1. Re:Word existed before Godzilla by Eightlines · · Score: 1

      Awesome, I think that word is worth something like 10 points in scrabble!

    2. Re:Word existed before Godzilla by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Actually, a Z is worth 10 points. The whole word would be 14 point unmodified by tile placement.

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:Word existed before Godzilla by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      MS lost against Lindows because "Windows" is already an English word, so the judge decided that Lindows could easily have been derived from the English word rather than Microsoft's trademark. However, "Godzilla" is not an English word, and it only means one thing.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Word existed before Godzilla by zurab · · Score: 2

      True. The naming "zilla" is present in different plants as well as spiders.

    5. Re:Word existed before Godzilla by phriedom · · Score: 2

      But I don't think any judge is going to believe that Davezilla and Mozilla were named after the zilla plant, and have only coincidental similarity to Godzilla. Do you? I'm not saying that they are infringing on the trade mark, I'm just saying that it is obvious that they were named after Godzilla. I think there is a pretty strong chance that a judge will find that Toho is too late, that they have not defended their trademark, and that is has passed into speech not related to their property. But that is just my inexpert opinion.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  105. Don't think they won't do it by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    I don't know about trademarks, but Japan has some pretty strict copyright laws. You can't even use a picture or screencap in an article or webpage without their permission, and if you do they WILL go after you. As a result Japanese fansites are kind of pathetic - mostly text, with perhaps some hand-drawn artwork. I don't know if they have anything like a fair use clause, but I seriously of doubt it. Likely toho is fuming over this "disrespectful" allusion/homage to their creation.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Don't think they won't do it by Fjord · · Score: 2

      Even under these strict laws, I don't see a problem, since Mozilla doesn't contain and screen captures of any Godzilla movies.

      I agre with the previous poster that this is a trademark issue, and they will have problems applying their trademark so many years after a brand has been established.

      --
      -no broken link
  106. I wonder if... by dr_dank · · Score: 2

    the token annoying Japanese kid in tight shorts will be on hand to testify....

    Probably not, his dubbing would be unbearable.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  107. I propose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...mozilla changes the name to mojira.

    Seriously though, wasnt there some kind of law that allows such things if the name is being used for a fair long time?
    how long has the name mozilla has been used?

    1. Re:I propose... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough, the name "Mojira" is used by a group of Mozilla developers in Japan...

  108. Confused by Shagg · · Score: 2

    How does Toho sending a cease and desist letter to someone named Davezilla about naming a character on his site "Godzilla" have anything to do with Mozilla the browser?

    Where in any of this is Toho threatening Mozilla mentioned?

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  109. Margerine doomed? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    What about the margerine brand Mazolla? Are they being harassed also? If not, change the name to "Mozolla". What a difference a vowel can make.

    1. Re:Margerine doomed? by armyofone · · Score: 1

      You really are a spelling terrorsist, arent' you? :-)

      It's 'Mazola' with one ell. Which makes it a real stretch to connect with Godzilla.

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    2. Re:Margerine doomed? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* It's 'Mazola' with one ell. *)

      Then call it Mozolla. You missed my bigger point of altering the spelling so that it sounds more or less the same without *looking* the same or copying the Japanese monster spelling.

    3. Re:Margerine doomed? by armyofone · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss your point. I think you missed mine; Mazola to Godzilla - no one is going to make that connection, (except maybe you :).

      Also, I don't think that ACH Foods will be changing the spelling of Mazola anytime soon. They've spent the past ~100 years building brand recognition, after all.

      Another point, since Mazola has been around since the early 1900's, Toho wouldn't have a legal leg to stand on if they did try to go after them for trademark infringement. It's more likely Mazola would win a cease & desist against Toho. Now that would be funny!

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  110. Origins of "Mozilla" by Thoguth · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if it will make any difference in the lawsuit or not, but the term Mozilla was coined at Netscape because it was intended to be a "Mosaic Killer." The lizard and Godzilla references were secondary, weren't they?

    --
    The requested URL /iframe/sig.html was not found on this server.
    1. Re:Origins of "Mozilla" by Erbo · · Score: 2
      Right...and it was Jamie Zawinski himself who named it. See his diary entries from that period...
      A week or two ago we all sat around and tried to think up a name for the client; we can't call it Mosaic, because that's the name of the company [or was at the time -Erbo]. The marketroids had all kinds of silly suggestions like Cyber this and Power that and blah-blah Ware. Then someone said something about crushing NCSA Mosaic, and I blurted out ``Mozilla!'' Everyone seemed to like that, so I think that might end up being the official name of the browser.
      Little did he know it was history in the making...

      Then, of course, when Netscape decided to go open-source, he went and registered mozilla.org to house the new project.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    2. Re:Origins of "Mozilla" by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      Why dosen't the Godzilla(tm) peoplw sue JWZ since he created the name for a certain GPL/LGPL/MPL licensed browser suite?

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    3. Re:Origins of "Mozilla" by welshsocialist · · Score: 1
      According to the FODOC:

      Mozilla

      The open source web browser , designed for standards-compliance, performance, and portability, whose development is coordinated by mozilla.org.

      The Mozilla project started in March 1998 when Netscape Communications Corporation released the source code of Netscape Communicator . The now abandoned version based on that code is referred to as "Mozilla Classic". Since then, much has been rewritten, including the layout engine, the networking library, and the front-end.

      mozilla.org was set up by Netscape in January 1998 to coordinate development and to provide a point of contact for interested people.

      Although a lot of Mozilla code is under the original Netscape Public License, some parts of the code are under the Mozilla Public License or dual MPL/GPL.

      "Mozilla" was the original project code name for Netscape Navigator and, according to some of the documentation, the correct pronunciation of "Netscape".

      Home (http://www.mozilla.org/) .

      [Derived from "Mosaic killer/Godzilla"?]

      Notice the last line?

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  111. Wondering about Mangia Pizza (Austin) by Loligo · · Score: 2


    Here in Austin there is a small chain (three or four stores) of pizza places called Mangia's.

    http://www.mangiapizza.com/

    They use a large green dino-dragon-esque mascot (his name is Marty), and have a pizza called the Mangiazilla. Their catering truck at one location has a large molded Marty-zilla along the back. ... although now, having looked at their site, I notice very few references to Marty (one image on the "Fun" page, the patriotic banner on the front page has a reptillian hand/claw holding the pole), and the Mangiazilla pizza is no longer listed on the menu.

    I guess they got their letter, too.

    Isn't there some protection for places that obviously are not in a competing market? Couldn't a company make tiny pillows and call themselves Microsoft Bedding? Why don't the same protections apply to a web browser or pizza joint compared to a movie monster? Is it due strictly to the merchandising potential of something like a movie character?

    -l

    1. Re:Wondering about Mangia Pizza (Austin) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget roundtable pizza!
      http://roundtablepizza.com/

    2. Re:Wondering about Mangia Pizza (Austin) by graikor · · Score: 1

      Bummer. They used to have all sorts of cool t-shirts featuring Marty in various costumes and situations. I had one with him on a pitcher's mound in a Cubs uniform before the washing machine ate it.

      Hmm... now I'm craving an Mangia stuffed pie for lunch - damn you, Loligo!

  112. "Zilla" Are the lawyers just bored these days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word Mozilla is so entrenched in the IT community, I just don't see how any legal action could do squat.

    Can anyone tell me where the word zilla came from? Some Japanese director must have pulled the zilla part of Gozirra from somewhere. The word Godzilla isn't even a Japanese possibility. As far as I can find the word zilla is a plant.

    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    So shouldn't someone sue Toho on behaf of the Zilla plant? GodZilla is stealing the glory of the Zilla plant. Just think, this plant has fed the Arabs for thousands of years, way before Godzilla ever went crashing around the mountainsides of Japan. School children around the world are being mislead that the word zilla has something to do with a big lizard! Write your local representative!!

    Watashi wa namai Godazira des.

  113. I think they should pull an Apple... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 3, Funny

    And rename it 'Butthead Japanese Company' instead.

  114. There's no reason to worry..... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because at the end of Godzilla 2000 there's a little japanese guy that says that "There's a little Godzilla in all of us".

    Don't know if that's legally binding or not.

  115. More problems once the NBA hears about Mozilla ... by Greedo · · Score: 1

    I've been waiting forever to read the news that the Toronto Raptors are filing a lawsuit against Mozilla for (what in my opinion) is a blatent infringement of the Raptor logo.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  116. Monster Sushi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a great sushi place in New York City, on 23rd between (I think) 5th and 6th, called "Monster Sushi". They had a very similar letter on their wall; I think it was because they had a Godzilla Roll (yum! with Spicy Mothra Sauce!)

    They had to change the names of any menu items that explicity violated any trademarked names. They had no problem keeping the Monster Sushi name, I think in part because their nigiri is absolutely HUGE - the length and width of two full fingers, none of this pansy pinky finger crap.

  117. they sure did wait long enough... by gilxa1226 · · Score: 1

    oh thats right... up until recently Mozilla wouldn't have mattered to them because they were not that well known. However, now that they are getting national press the big dogs come out to bite. Always seems to happen this way... much like what Microsoft did to Redmond Linux and Lindows.

  118. attacks plural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as if an attack from godzilla isnt enough, an attack of the slashdot effect is upon this site. sucks...

  119. your argument doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fight between WWF and WWE was strickly over the acronym WWF. Two companies trying to use the SAME acronym. We are talking about only partial matches here.

    That like Wal-Mart trying to sue Getty-Mart, or any other XXX-Mart.. etc.. etc..

    1. Re:your argument doesn't apply. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the local XXX-Mart, btw?

    2. Re:your argument doesn't apply. by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      No its like Walmart trying to sue Walshop, or Walstore, or any other Wal-*.

      --
      Why not fork?
  120. Godzilla vs. Mozilla by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    What about Mojira?

    Scientists need to act swiftly to develop a super robot version of Mozilla called Mecha Mozilla. It will be invincible!

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  121. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great this sets a legal precedent, then I can fuck slashdot over the use of slash and dot and ergo period, then every person using the english language and or a charector set with the " ." in it will have to pay me 3 dollers per....and you though billgates was stinking rich.

  122. When is the Catholic church going to sue Toho for using "God-" as a previx? That's some age-old copyright there. Old enough that soon it'll get reclaimed by the next amendment to the copyright expiration laws. Toho better start quaking in their boots. Well, not quaking. Wouldn't want iD software to sue, after all.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  123. Where is... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Where is Ultraman when you need him?

  124. WTF (was Re:Too Late) by sebol · · Score: 0, Troll

    Luckily 'World Wresting Federation' did not change their name to "World Twrestling Federation" (WTF)

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
  125. Simple solution by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    The double-l in "zilla" is actually the spanish phoneme, pronounced as a consonantal "y", as in "quesadilla" (kay-sah-dee-ya) or "llama" (ya-ma).

    Thus, "Mozilla" = "Mo-zee-ya".

    Problem solved.

    Besides, after the $8 anal raping that was the american Godzilla movie a few years ago, I doubt that Soho has any respect at all for the trademark.

    GMFTatsujin

  126. The people in Zillah, WA are going to be upset. by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1

    The people in Zillah, WA are going to be upset when they have to change the name of their town.

  127. Precedent with Donkey Kong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something similar happened 20 years ago... See what happened... http://www.365animation.com/games/hollywood.shtml CaPZilla!

  128. This is a joke, right? by mark-t · · Score: 2
    I don't believe I'm mistaken that the term "godzilla" has been in public domain for decades as a generic term for a giant reptile-monster creature that goes around stomping on tall buildings and breathing fire. Although I won't dispute their alleged claim to the trademark on it, they should have been defending themselves when other people were using the term a loooooong time before this. At the very least, the concept of godzilla has been rehashed so many times, in so many forms, that the trademark on the imagery has certainly long since been voided.

    Refer to Bayer's Aspirin for another (and probably much better known) example of this.

  129. I guess I'm totally screwed, then. by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    Note /. username.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  130. That blows my plans... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    ...to re(anti)christen my Celeron 433 box Dilzilla after upgrading it to a nForce 2 mobo and an Athlon XP. Dilbert+Bob The Dinosaur=Dilzilla. Its current netname is Dilputer.

    I suppose after I upgrade Dilputer I'll rename it Alice. She and her Fist Of Death kicks ass. And I don't want ninjas from Toho Pictures swarming on Catseye Labs if I rename it Dilzilla.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  131. Those were the days..... by peterprior · · Score: 1

    "Mozilla held a placard that read, "Netscape 72, Microsoft 18," referring to recent market share data."

    Two versions on... how much of a share has M$ gained ?

    1. Re:Those were the days..... by welshsocialist · · Score: 1
      Two versions on... how much of a share has M$ gained ?

      AFAIK, It's MSIE 93%, NS 5%.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  132. WWF? by siskbc · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain this? I mean, there are only 17576 possible 3-letter acronyms. What precedent allows for such a blatant and ridiculous claim? I mean, it's not like any of the standard arguments like confusability hold. And what happens if, I don't know, 18000 people want to use an acronym? Tough luck?

    Also, how does British law hold when this is an american company broadcasting primarily in America? Does British law allow for international protection...of an acronym???? Can I also go to britain and copyright pi? Perhaps Planck's constant?

    No offense to any Brits, but that is truly retarded. Another example of how we need trained judges and legislators for intellectual property cases.

    At least the Mozilla case will be tried domestically, if it gets that far.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:WWF? by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      First of all, there is no Mozilla case. As the article mentioned, they aren't going after Mozilla at this point.

      You really want it tried domestically? Then it's just the person with the most money wins. Well, in that case, I guess it'd be AOL/TW.<g>

    2. Re:WWF? by siskbc · · Score: 1

      There's no mozilla case...yet...but it smells like they're gearing up for it. So I'll assume there will be until proven otherwise.

      Hey, I don't mind benefiting from bought justice once in a while, I get screwed by it most of the time.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:WWF? by plugger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A serious question. Could someone set up a non-IT firm, call it something like 'Imaginative Balloon Makers', and use the acronym IBM without being harassed?

    4. Re:WWF? by Gorgonzola · · Score: 2

      Yes, that is perfectly possible. In France you have a posh brand of lighting gear called Mazda while at the same time Mazda cars are marketed under the brand name Mazda. The two companies have nothing in common. I don't know about US trademark law, but under European trademark law trademarks are filed for market categories. That makes it possible that you have KLM airlines in the Netherlands and KLM clothing as well. The latter is a clothing brand for exceptional tall people. Both brands have been registerd by different companies for different market categories.

      --
      -- Spelling and grammar errors tend to be a sign of erroneous thinking.
    5. Re:WWF? by Zordak · · Score: 1

      I would presume so. I have not seen any legal action pass between IBC root beer and the International Bank of Commerce (IBC again). As long as you don't have a blue logo on your store that looks like IBM, and as long as you don't go anywhere near the computer industry, you'd probably be okay.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  133. Isn't it obvious? by NewbieV · · Score: 1, Funny

    According to my (somewhat abridged) Japanese - English dictionary, "Toho" means...

    wait for it...

    "all your zilla are belong to us"

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
  134. MOD PARENT UP by Zancarius · · Score: 1

    My post is probably flaimbait and highly off-topic, but the parent makes a really good point! Mod sdjunky up!

    --
    He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off, puckerpoker.

      mod when you have points, shut your ass when you don't.

      either way, shut the hell up.

      and ya know the great part of this? you'll be even more lame (if that's possible) if you respond to this.

  135. Fragrant misreporting... by Junta · · Score: 2

    This is just a brand new low. This isn't just an editorial slant, this could be shown to be slandering Toho. There is no evidence that this in any way relates to a strategy regarding mozilla. The key issue with davezilla is that there is a portrayed character named godzilla on the site with a similar appearance, head on infringement. To say definitively that this is just their strategy to take down mozilla is just damn stupid.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Fragrant misreporting... by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 2

      As mentioned above (and in the Register where I first saw this story), Dave claims he *never* called his logo Godzilla. And it really doesn't look anything like Godzilla either.

      However, I agree that tying in the Mozilla link was their excuse to post this somewhat non-story.

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    2. Re:Fragrant misreporting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this would constitute libel, not slander.

  136. Check out the Greedy Bunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.fortune.com
    I'm in the money.
    I'm in the money.
    Ted's in the money. to the tune of over a BILLION.
    good reason NOT to buy a gateway.

  137. Offending company deserves a good 'slashbeating' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we at least giving the offending Japanese company a good slashdotting? Mayhaps this will give them a taste of the negative effect that pursuing this baseless case will have.

    Here's the link again if you don't have it:

    http://www.toho.co.jp/

  138. Wait just a little longer! by Redline · · Score: 1

    Sheesh, can't Toho just wait until our little browser stomps all over Redmond and breathes atomic fire on the Microsoft campus?

    1. Re:Wait just a little longer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not your browser.

      A little pimp to go with your whore?

      Arr Doo BeY Ahh Ess ?

      I believe you are a homosexual.

  139. A Prediction by perfects · · Score: 1

    Going after names derived from an outdated name like Godzilla makes about as much sense as going after "Planet Of The..."

    In other words, it makes a lot of sense in the right context.

    I predict that within a few weeks it will be announced that [name of major studio] will be releasing a Godzilla movie in time for [Christmas 2004?], produced by [a name you recognize] and directed by [another name you recognize].

    I just hope it doesn't star Adam Sandler.

  140. Mozilla was first, I think by Ironica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While Toho first trademarked the Godzilla word mark in 1981, they did not hold a trademark on its use in computer software until October of 1994. Mozilla started in "mid-1994" from the best info I've been able to find. I seem to remember someone showing it to me in the spring of that year, though that might have been Mosaic. Neither their first trademark nor the software one have any illustrations or descriptions of a lizard-like monster creature, though; that does not appear to be a part of the trademark. Their most comprehensive trademark was registered in 2000, presumably with the launch of the Sony movie. That one *still* doesn't describe godzilla though.

    I'm no trademark attorney, but I'm guessing that, since they're not claiming in the trademark registration that the mark consists of the word + the monster, they don't have a leg to stand on with *zilla claims. Also, it doesn't appear they stopped Bugzilla (the cleaning agent, not the software) from registering its trademark in 2000. Milton Bradley has also owned a trademark on Eggzilla since 1987.

    All in all, they have a lot of fish to fry if they're going to try to reserve *zilla as their own, including multiple existing or pending trademarks. (Budzilla, Rodzilla, and Speedzilla are all currently published for opposition.)

    I love the Trademark Electronic Search System...

    --
    Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    1. Re:Mozilla was first, I think by Ironica · · Score: 1

      Gah, stupid expiring sessions. Anyway, go here and search on Godzilla, you'll be amazed.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:Mozilla was first, I think by Erbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Mozilla started in "mid-1994" from the best info I've been able to find.
      In Jamie Zawinski's diaries from that period, he mentions the meeting where he first coined the term "Mozilla," and describes it as being "a week or two ago" in an entry dated August 5, 1994. Late July 1994 is a good "best estimate" for the origin of "Mozilla."
      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    3. Re:Mozilla was first, I think by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      When was it first used in interstate commerce? That's all that matters.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Mozilla was first, I think by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      The Constitution doesn't say that Congress only has power over interstate commerce -- it says they have power over IC in addition to other things, including trademarks, patents, and copyright. If you violate someone's trademark on a local basis (say, by selling Koka-Kola brand soft drink), they can still sue you even if it never leaves the state.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  141. But the porn! What about the porn? by Reverend30 · · Score: 1

    So what happens to http://www.thumbzilla.com ?

  142. *zilla*.com Deleted and On Hold domain names by wherley · · Score: 1
    per www.deleteddomains.com, here are the Zilla
    type domains (.com only) from the past that are
    no longer live:

    1 - adminzilla.com (DELETED on 07-10-02)
    2 - bodzillarules.com (DELETED on 08-08-02)
    3 - bopzilla.com (DELETED on 07-24-02)
    4 - bozilla.com (on hold since 08-06-02)
    5 - brazillastminute.com (DELETED on 08-10-02)
    6 - cdzilla.com (on hold since 08-04-02)
    7 - chanzilla.com (on hold since 07-24-02)
    8 - chimpzilla.com (DELETED on 07-17-02)
    9 - chubzillas.com (on hold since 07-24-02)
    10 - cornzilla.com (on hold since 07-27-02)
    11 - cozilla.com (DELETED on 07-08-02)
    12 - devzilla.com (DELETED on 07-05-02)
    13 - digizilla.com (DELETED on 07-01-02)
    14 - dorkzilla.com (on hold since 07-15-02)
    15 - duck-zilla.com (DELETED on 06-23-02)
    16 - fatzilla.com (DELETED on 07-14-02)
    17 - fuckzilla.com (on hold since 08-02-02)
    18 - g0dzilla.com (DELETED on 07-16-02)
    19 - godzilla-kids.com (on hold since 07-19-02)
    20 - godzillaclassics.com (DELETED on 06-27-02)
    21 - godzillacommunications.com (DELETED on 07-03-02)
    22 - godzillamcmurphy.com (DELETED on 07-21-02)
    23 - godzillameat.com (on hold since 07-24-02)
    24 - godzillanetworks.com (on hold since 07-16-02)
    25 - godzillauniverse.com (DELETED on 06-27-02)
    26 - godzillaweb.com (on hold since 08-02-02)
    27 - godzillaxmegaguirus.com (DELETED on 06-25-02)
    28 - hatzilla.com (DELETED on 07-08-02)
    29 - hunzilla.com (DELETED on 07-07-02)
    30 - itzilla.com (DELETED on 06-20-02)
    31 - lordcorpzilla.com (DELETED on 06-17-02)
    32 - madboofzilla.com (DELETED on 06-22-02)
    33 - mallzilla1.com (DELETED on 06-22-02)
    34 - meca-gozilla.com (DELETED on 06-27-02)
    35 - mohozilla.com (DELETED on 07-08-02)
    36 - mozillabook.com (DELETED on 07-09-02)
    37 - mozillas.com (DELETED on 07-05-02)
    38 - mypugzilla.com (on hold since 08-06-02)
    39 - myzillamail.com (on hold since 08-03-02)
    40 - niczilla.com (on hold since 07-07-02)
    41 - palmzilla.com (DELETED on 06-24-02)
    42 - pinkgodzilla.com (on hold since 07-31-02)
    43 - pinkgodzillasushi.com (on hold since 08-03-02)
    44 - pokeyzilla.com (DELETED on 07-20-02)
    45 - rampzilla.com (on hold since 08-01-02)
    46 - robizilla.com (DELETED on 07-14-02)
    47 - schoolzilla.com (DELETED on 07-30-02)
    48 - shirtzilla.com (DELETED on 06-23-02)
    49 - skyzilla.com (DELETED on 07-19-02)
    50 - thinzilla.com (DELETED on 07-16-02)
    51 - tonzilla.com (on hold since 07-28-02)
    52 - verzilla.com (on hold since 07-24-02)
    53 - www-thumbzilla.com (on hold since 07-01-02)
    54 - zillacheats.com (DELETED on 07-26-02)
    55 - zillanet.com (on hold since 08-01-02)
    56 - zipzilla.com (on hold since 08-06-02)
    57 - zisforzillah.com (DELETED on 06-19-02)
  143. zilla is lizard or dragon, right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what if this whole Godzilla was merely a fictional adaption of existing legend/myth? Wouldn't that mean that it is not anyones place to file suit?

  144. Not Zilla by RichiP · · Score: 1

    The Japanese don't even pronounce it zilla ... they pronounce it something like "goh'zirra". If they win, does that mean that Stan Lee can go after anyone useing the name "Super-something"? (Superman was a Stan Lee creation, wasn't he?)

    1. Re:Not Zilla by dark_panda · · Score: 2

      Stan Lee created or co-created Spider-Man, the Hulk, a bunch of Marvel superheroes. Joe Shuster and Jerry Siegel created Superman for DC Comics. And at that, the word "superman" was an actual word before Shuster and Siegel created Superman -- it was a translation of the German word "ubermensch", litterally a "super-man".

      J

  145. Slashdot: The Preferred name in copyright defence by Sir_Dill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who needs to sue these guys anymore....just post the intent to sue on Slashdot and watch the server crash. They can't infringe if thier server is a smoking pile of slag on the floor.

  146. Some small preperation by Warthog9 · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd mention that if this really does go to trial this company, Toho, is going to have to start some pretty heafty legal battles! The reason for this is how many companys are using a zilla post-fix? Lets see (off the top of my head not even doing searches) Mozilla and Go!Zilla, after doing a quick search (google, search=zilla) I find that JWZ has a rather prominant website with "nomo zilla", http://gamezilla.com, http://www.zilladesign.com/, http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/3749/bzilla.htm (someone planning a Godzilla rip off as a project), http://www.zillasports.com/, http://www.cafeelectric.com/ (produces a product called zilla with a reptilian logo), http://www.trafficzilla.com/, and the list goes on. I mean come on, this is a LOT of companys all using some sort of a "zilla" and some sort of a reptilian logo (of sorts) and some of these are LEGIT businesses! Why go after mozilla if it's an open source project (worse case scenario, heaven forbid, it changes it's name) when there are others making money off of the same type of thing? Sorry Toho, you loose....

    1. Re:Some small preperation by RichiP · · Score: 1

      Well they don't HAVE to go after all of them ... just those who're making money off of the name's use (and, by extension, those who they can make money off of)

  147. Maybe right, however by einhverfr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Note that the user agent strings in most browsers say "Mozilla." For example, IE 6 on .NET Server says, "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.0.3705)."

    This tells me that Mozilla has become common enough in its own right as distinct from Godzilla. The most they could do would be to try to force a change of mascot, much as it would be funny to see them try to argue "Your honor, we submit that the user agent string in Internet Explorer is in violation of our trademark rights, and demand 1% of all Windows sales revenue."

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Maybe right, however by NeoNormal · · Score: 1

      > Note that the user agent strings in most browsers say "Mozilla." For
      > example, IE 6 on .NET Server says, "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0;
      > Windows NT 5.2; .NET CLR 1.0.3705)."

      Also, does this not go all the way back to the first incarnations of NetScape? Maybe even further? Why do they wait til now to bitch?

    2. Re:Maybe right, however by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      Besides, the simplest solution would to but a disclaimer on the bottom of the web page-- something like: "Mozilla is not affiliated in any way with Toho of Gozilla. If you are looking for their web site go here." This would effectively combat the "user concern" argument and their only argument left would be that it was diluting the value of their trademark. That is where the "why wait till now to bitch?" argument comes in handy.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:Maybe right, however by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stop your average person on the street, and ask them "What is Mozilla?", they will have no clue. Only geeks and some power users will really know at this point. It's a common word only in the technophiles. It could quite easily be that it wasn't brought to the attention of the top people/lawyers at Toho until fairly recently. The mozilla folks REALLY should have taken the time to get a quick "ok" from them before they used a name/icon that are obvious references to godzilla. If they'd done their homework this would be a non-issue.

    4. Re:Maybe right, however by seebs · · Score: 2

      >Also, does this not go all the way back to the
      >first incarnations of NetScape? Maybe even
      >further? Why do they wait til now to bitch?

      Presumably because, until the Mozilla project showed up as such, the name "mozilla" was not being *presented to the user*. And until 1.0, it wasn't being shoved at end-users as a thing to use.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    5. Re:Maybe right, however by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that trademarks must be aggressively defended, i think that the owners of the Godzilla mark may be a few years late..

      After all, Mozilla has been the public code-name of the Netscape project since before it was even Netscape. We're talking NCSA Mosaic days for gods sake!

      They shouldn't expect to come out now, when every IE and Netscape client in existance reports 'Mozilla' in the User-Agent, and think they're gonna get something done. At this point, Mozilla is a well established name in the computer-world.

  148. NO WAY! MOBARNEY RULES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is one of the best names for a software package I have ever heard. I lead a sad life, also.

  149. Fly Lice by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    It's Fried Rice. You irriot!

  150. This is complete nonsense by arathanog · · Score: 1

    I have been reading Slashdot for awhile and have never posted before. But this situation is such complete and utter bullshit, I am writing my first post.

    I just wanted to tell you all that I work in Trademarks at the USPTO and the idea that anyone could possibly confuse the movie character GODZILLA with your DAVEZILLA website is complete and utter bullshit. I would love to see them prove dilution or damages in court. 23 out of 25 attys in my law office agreed with me. Fight this! Greedy corporate pigs....

    Of course, you all realize that they are just going to try to bleed him dry with legal fees until he gives up.

    1. Re:This is complete nonsense by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      So did you fire the two that disagreed with you?

  151. What about Go!Zilla? by mkoenecke · · Score: 1

    (Does "IAAL" work as an acronym?)

    Interesting how company counsel chooses to go after some individual who is unlikely to possess the resources to contest their claim. I wonder if they're going after more commercial uses of variations on the word "Godzilla?"

    http://gozilla.com

    --
    TANSTAAFL
    1. Re:What about Go!Zilla? by (blind)+(idiot) · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why don't they go after Go!zilla? Get rid of a crappy download manager and the spyware that comes with it.

  152. Something stinks by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    Misreporters should all be forced to shower on regualr basis.

  153. Got Zilla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, I wouldn't mind if the Milk Council copyrighted the word "Got" in order to nix all those thousands of *wonderfully original* variations that never fail to make me laugh and laugh and laugh. "Got Root?" What a gut-buster!

  154. Not necessarily such a bad thing... by sgage · · Score: 1, Troll

    I always thought "Mozilla" was a stupid name for a fucking web browser. Maybe they can have a contest to come up with a new name. How about "grp" (pronounced "Gurp"). Stands for Gecko Reference Platform. Whatever.

  155. -Zilla? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's a killa! Next they go after vanilla and [the artist formerly identifiable as] Michael Jackson and his "Thrilla." And what about Hanna-Barbera and their Magilla Gorilla?

    This whole thing just makes me feel illa.

  156. it's a plant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    zilla

    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

  157. Obligatory Movie Reference by PowerBook2k · · Score: 2, Funny

    (From "Austin Powers in Goldmember")
    Japanese Man 1: RUN!!!!! IT'S GODZILLA!
    Japanese Man 2: It looks like Godzilla but due to international copyright laws...it's not.
    Japanese Man 1: STILL, WE SHOULD RUN LIKE IT IS GODZILLA!!
    Japanese Man 2: No, it isn't.
    [Japanese Man 2 Winks at Camera]

  158. What about Go'Zilla? by dmp123 · · Score: 1

    What about the download accelerator program Go'Zilla?

    It's even closer to the name than Mozilla is! Surely they'd be better off having a shot at that (anything to get rid of a horribly inefficient piece of spyware!)

    David

  159. zilla is a previously used term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zilla is used as a term in india, apparently in refernce to rural govt.
    http://www.kar.nic.in/bellary/

    zilla is a plant
    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    this is a stupid suit

    1. Re:zilla is a previously used term by (blind)+(idiot) · · Score: 1

      Exactly, while they're at it they might as well crack down on the Bellary Zilla Panchayat. Or, beyond that, get rid of the book A Friend Like Zilla. Better yet, wipe out the Zilla Dioda spider.

  160. God Sues Godzilla for use of Trademark Name by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    God today files a lawsuit in superior court today against Godzilla for its use of the Trademark name God.

    Will this never end?

    1. Re:God Sues Godzilla for use of Trademark Name by malkavian · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. I'm sure if the Church really wished it so, they could dig up a load of old church laws, and burn the guy at the stake for heresy in taking the name God and associating it with a lizard..

  161. Bugzilla will be next.. by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    I guess.

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    1. Re:Bugzilla will be next.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, the bastards.

  162. not a problem by norhythmsoldier · · Score: 1

    Go ahead and change the name. Just think of the possibilities! I think it would be hilarious if there was an open source project called MoScrilla.

  163. Gozilla by davidsansome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Gozilla - that annoying download-resumer thing for Windows? It sounds a lot more like Godzilla than Davezilla.

    --
    -- Wibble
    1. Re:Gozilla by Openadvocate · · Score: 1

      Shh, it's a secret!!!

      --
      my sig
  164. FAA is next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    As I'm checking flight status for Chicago O'Hare airport (which I hope none of you is flying through today, btw), I go the the FAA website and am redirected to this url:
    http://www.fly.faa.gov/flyFAA/indexzilla.htm l
    Guess the FAA had better watch out!

  165. It's about time by ryanvm · · Score: 2

    Well, I for one am glad to see this happening. I am sick and tired of the utter confusion that ensues while trying to figure out the difference between my web browser and the giant, destructive, dinosaur-like monster that attacked all those poor Japanese people.

  166. While generally I agree... by sterno · · Score: 1

    I agree with you that legal actions on such issues have become a game that has little to do with the legal standing of them, this is a bit different in the long run. While they can sue this guy and he'll likely cave, they aren't going to get a similar response from the Mozilla folks. Why? Because they have the backing of one of the largest media empires on the planet (AOL Time Warner), and because there's value in the Mozilla trademark.

    My best is that if they go after Mozilla, they'll end up in court and they will lose.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:While generally I agree... by Danse · · Score: 2

      Maybe this Dave guy should have told them that he ripped the name from Mozilla and that they should go sue AOL/TW instead :)

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:While generally I agree... by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      If anything, that would seem to encourage even more rigorous defence of the trademark; if they interpret Dave as infringing, and he got it off Mozilla, that would seem to give them more ammunition in court that infringements are 'viral' and must be stopped at all costs.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:While generally I agree... by Danse · · Score: 2

      Actually, I would think that it would lead to the understanding that "*zilla" is really not deserving of protection at this point. Mozilla has been in worldwide use for 10 years. Seems to me that they've foreited their chance to make a claim about it. I don't know how courts normally look at a trademark issue and what standards they use, but it seems that the standards would have to pretty loose for their infringement claim to hold water.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  167. What the US Trademark Office has on file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Milton Bradley has a trademark for the EGGZILLA parlour game. This was approved by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), so it doesn't conflict with Toho Co Ltd's Godzilla trademarks. On this basis, Mozilla should be safe.

    This info came from the US Patent and Trademark Office's web site (http://www.uspto.gov), which lists 22 Godzilla-related and similar trademarks.

    Trademarks are awarded for particular business areas, which must be specified in the trademark application, along with the date when the mark was first used.

    For example, TM number 73217718 was filed in 1979 and awarded in 1981. It covers Godzilla(TM) used in the context of:
    IC 041. US 107. G & S: Entertainment Services in the Nature of a Continuing Motion Picture Film Series. FIRST USE: 19560000. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19560000

    A quick look through the other Godzilla trademark applications shows that they apply to animated series, games, beach towels, computer games, etc.

    IANAL, and don't know how narrowly the USPTO defines computer software, but I would think that as long as Mozilla is not posing as a computer game, there is no conflict.

    1. Re:What the US Trademark Office has on file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are going after the use of the Lizard in conjunction with the name, not just the name itself.

  168. DEPTH CARGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will get that Japanese sub !

  169. My site infringes too... by moncyb · · Score: 2

    HOLY CRAP! I just realized my website uses the letter 'a' many times. In fact my ISP's domain has an 'a' in it. Uh-oh, since Godzilla has an 'a' in it, they're going to sue the pants off of us!

    Wait a sec...my friend uses the word 'God' in her site...they'll be going after her too! Oh the humanity!

  170. Acronyms, was RE:Too Late by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Case in point, the NSS: National Space Society or National Speleological Society or Network Security Services or National Super Suction company (now NSS enterprises) or National Sports Services, or Nuclear Science Symposium or............
    All are valid uses of 'NSS', some are commercial ventures, some are non-profits and several have trademarks or copyrights with their associated name, not the abbreviation.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  171. Old school logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Axiom #1
    _____Anonymous Coward said "God is dead".

    Axiom #2
    _____God said "Anonymous Coward is dead".

    Therefore:
    _____The dead said "God is an Anonymous Coward"

    1. Re:Old school logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Therefore...God is an Anonymous Coward
      >
      Not really. I have an Slashdot account under an alias, but I don't advertise. The last time I did, you can't believe how much email I got!

  172. Or better yet, Gamera!! by TrekCycling · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Or better yet, Gamera!! by servo8 · · Score: 1

      Gamera, friend to children!!!

    2. Re:Or better yet, Gamera!! by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Gamera is really neat
      He is filled with turtle meat
      We love you.. GAMERA!

      God, I miss good MST3K

    3. Re:Or better yet, Gamera!! by TrekCycling · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I wish they'd put out some of THESE on DVD (the MST3K version, I mean).

    4. Re:Or better yet, Gamera!! by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Looks bad for digital cameras doesn't it?

  173. popezilla by dollargonzo · · Score: 1

    my friend made up an entity called popezilla. it would run around and eat synagogues.... boy was that funny!

    QED

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
  174. Amazon.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Godzilla vs. Davezilla vs. Mozilla? When is that coming out on DVD? Can I preorder it from Amazon.com?

    No, you'll have to order it from Amazilla.com

  175. DEPTH CARGE-20 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  176. Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I have to give up my qzilla at hotmail dot com address? I do have it.

    qz

  177. This can be easily settled out of court. by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Just give them 50% profits off of mozilla. Write them a check each month for $0.00, and comment field saying for sexual favors.
    They could also get a discount on all mozilla downloads!

  178. If they own Zilla, God too? by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    If they can complain about zilla, will they also complain about God?

  179. God(tm) counter sues Toho by jwiegley · · Score: 1
    In a related story later today, God issued a statement that he intends to bring heavy litigation against Toho for their obvious transgession of copyright and trademark material.

    In additional to any monetary damages awarded by the court He has also stated that He will be seeking more long-term, Eternal punishments; citing precendences pertaining to "Thou shall not take the Lord's name in vain".

    There is some controversy surrounding this precedence as it is not commonly viewed as valid by secular courts. Those closer to The Lord however hold little doubt that He will be able to act upon this measure with "swift and furious vengeance".

    Public opinon has it that if Toho loses it will be highly unlikely that any appeals will be heard or effective.

    --
    I will never live for sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.
    1. Re:God(tm) counter sues Toho by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      Hearing the pleas of her OS X Mozilla using worshippers, the Great Goddess Mothra, who had resurrected the forests of Hokkaido and parted the Pacific Ocean, arose from her island and took flight. With two flaps of her mighty wings she sent God flying.

      Then the Heroic Wonder-Working Deity sent her holy Shobijin to Toho, and reminded the company that if it expected her to miraculously bail out Godzilla again in 2011, Toho needed to follow her ways of peace and happiness. That meant playing nicely with others. The Toho executives blanched at the thought of Mothra going back to her cave for another twenty years, and called their lawyers off.

      A Mighty Goddess is our Moth,
      The Peerless Queen of Monsters!
      She alone has defeated them all,
      E'en Godzilla fears her Name!

  180. DEPTH CARGE-40 feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  181. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just change the mascot to a small flowering bush and everyone should be happy.

  182. McDonalds has been doing this for years by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    they shut down a scottish-owned muffin stand named 'MacMuffins' and have harassed many similarly titled businesses out onto the street. if you have Mc or Mac in your business name, they'll come after you..

    I saw a report about it on 60 minutes a year or two ago. There actually is a Lord McDonald in Britain, who is *the* McDonald by way of a 500 year old royal charter (mebbe he's a thane or duke or other goofy title, besides the point). He heard about this type of stuff, and decided to open a high-class restaurant in his castle, named "McDonalds". He basically sat there daring them to take action. Of course they didnt, but it'd have been funny to see Mickey D's have to change THEIR name after picking the wrong battle.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  183. Austin Powers 3 anyone? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2

    Person 1: ITS GODZILLA!
    Person 2: Actually, it's not actually godzilla due to trademark restrictions but we can still pretend it's godzilla.
    Person 1: RUN, ITS GODZILLA!
    Person 2: (but not really!) AAAHH!

  184. Trademark law isn't Copyright law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fair use doesn't really apply.

    Even if that wasn't the case, it isn't satire, as Mozzilla isn't a joke, it is a real product.

    I don't know if the lizard/dragon is supposed to exemplify its threat to the competition, or be representative of the large, bloated, destructive mass of the application. Either way, the name, and logo were specifically chosen to conjure up images of Godzilla.

    They aren't quoting any of the movies.

    They aren't being satirical of any of the movies.

    The product is a legitimate product.

    No fair use going on here, even if it was just a copyright problem, which it isn't.

  185. I'm worried about the "Mo" part, too. by 0bjectiv3 · · Score: 1

    What if C3 Entertainment sues Mozilla for its blatant abuse of the trademarked "Mo*" from The Three Stooges?

    I guess they'll have to use a null value instead of "Mozilla".

    Nyuk nyuk nyuk!

    --

    "Saddam Hussein cavorts with terrorists."
  186. good vs. evil by eyeball · · Score: 2

    Will somebody please register satanzilla.com before I do? I need another domain like I need another hole in my head.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  187. Stupid laws by kavau · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Has it occured to anyone that maybe Toho is bringing up this suit only to comply with the requirement that you have to actively defend a trademark in order to keep the exclusive rights to the trademark?

    In other words: Let's say the company just sits around and does nothing about Mozilla, DaveZilla, WhateverZilla. A few years from now some toy company (let's call them ToyZilla.com) starts selling some green dinosaurs, calling them Godzilla. Of course Toho is going to sue them over trademark infringement, but ToyZilla.com's lawyers argue that Toho lost all rights to the trademark, since it didn't do anything about Mozilla and the like.

    Therefore Toho's exec's say: Kill them while they're still small!

    Don't blame the company for doing stupid things if stupid laws require them to do so.

    1. Re:Stupid laws by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Has it occured to anyone that maybe Toho is bringing up this suit only to comply with the requirement that you have to actively defend a trademark in order to keep the exclusive rights to the trademark

      And the solution to that is to arrange a simple licensing agreement (details confidential), where AOL/TW gives them $3 and a jar of pimento olives in exchange for the rights to use the trademark. (Or better yet, agrees not to do something nasty, like ban Toho's products from all of their media outlets.)

      Problem solved.

      Of course, they should have done this a while ago, rather than letting the 'infringement' go unprosecuted for so long.

  188. ObSimpsons by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    I used to own Mickey Mouse Massage Parlors, then those Disney sleazebags shut me down. Look, I said, I'll change the logo, put Mickey's pants back on, but there's just no reasoning with some people.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  189. Legitimate infringement, but too little too late. by Myco · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm amused by how readily /.ers will jump up in defense of anyone accused of any sort of IP infringement. The suffix "-zilla" has entered the lexicon as a direct result of the Godzilla franchise. If I start a restaurant and sell a product called "sandwichzilla," you know I'm talking about a big honkin' monster of a sammich. And if I use a reptilian mascot to hawk said sammich, you know it's a reference to Godzilla. The very uniqueness of the name, and its well-known association with a giant reptilian monster, is exactly why this is legitimate infringement. It's asking too much suspension of disbelief to suppose that I might have independently come up with the nonsense syllables "zilla" and chosen to associate them with the very attributes that the "Godzilla" trademark has made famous.

    But Toho has taken far too long to say anything about it, and they have no legitimate grounds upon which to complain now. They failed to defend their mark, and now it's part of the common lexicon. It's like what we saw recently with the claims of a privately-held patent on the JPEG standard. Many people rightly quoted, uh, someone, saying something like "those who sleep on their rights cannot expect others to defend them."

  190. Bah.. they won't get far by GauteL · · Score: 2

    If AOL/TW actually believe they'll go after Davezilla in order to create precedence, there is nothing stopping the big evil mamozilla of a companzilla from chopping in some gazilla in Davezillas defense, is there?

  191. The Real Issue by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 2

    Nearly every comment here is missing the point.

    The objection brought against the website is the use of the term "GODZILLA" in conjunction with an image of a reptile(godzilla)-like creature. The C&D letter did mention the use of the "zilla" suffix but only in conjuntion with the use of their trademark and the likeness of a godzilla-like creature. It appears that if the image and reference were removed, the company would no longer have a complaint.

    As far as this being a pre-cursor to action against mozilla.... I can only chuckle. Even if the Godzilla trademark holders want to come after all the "zillas" out there (and I don't think they do), they would never be able to get a favorable ruling because this "zilla" construction has been used back into antiquity (in computing terms) and has never been challenged. So the courts would have to rule that "something-zilla" is no longer part of their trademark because it hasn't been protected

    --
    Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
  192. They should sue the City of Zillah, WA by ces · · Score: 1

    www.zillah.com I mean an Eastern Washington farm town with a bunch of wineries is just so confusingly similar to a fire-breathing radioactive Japanese dinosaur.

    Seriously you've really got to wonder in the current climate how long before a trademark holder goes after a small town with a name "confusingly similar" to their mark.

    --
    Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  193. New name: by acceleriter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Butthead Japanese Filmmaker. (Along the lines of Apple's codename "Sagan," which was changed to "BHA" for butt head astronomer when Sagan whined.)

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  194. Blue Oyster Cult by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens when you download the mp3 called
    BlueOysterCult - Godzilla.mp3

    Oh no, they say he's got to go..oo
    Godzilla.
    Yeahh..

    Blue Otter Cult rocks.. did I say Otter? heh heh thats a cool name. Hey ToYoGo KoYoGo Japan go after Blue Otter Cult..

    Speaking of downloads, better download Filezilla quick And FilezillaServer also

    it's on sourceforge. type in filezilla and enjoy the nice gftp clone..
    or if your lazy. Ya never know they may be next too!

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/filezilla/

    or

    http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?gro up _id=21558

  195. Don't jump to conclusions by jayhawk88 · · Score: 2

    ... to set a precedent before attacking Mozilla.

    Um, maybe, maybe not. So far all Toho has done is asked Davezilla to change his logo. There's no indication that they intend to "set a precedent" and "go after" anyone else.

    Granted, this all does seem a little suspicious. For all we know, though, some executive just had a nephew graduate from law school, and decided to give him a pet project to pad his resume. I'd say at least wait until the lawyer-letters go out before hitting the panic button.

  196. Austin Powers 3 by neuronaut · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily a direct quote:

    Bystander #1: "Oh no! It's Godzilla! Run!"

    Bystander #2: "Even though, due to international trademark laws, I must inform you that it's not actually Godzilla!"

  197. Hmmm... by _Knots · · Score: 1

    Anybody want to bet which country is the first to refuse to honor any IP law?

    ISTR the Ukraine didn't acknowledge US copyrights? (I've got a bad memory module, I think - help me out here). Maybe they should continue that trend.

    After all the US's economy did pretty well a century or two ago after it refused to honor UK IP, allowing factories to spring up there which would otherwise be "in violation" of the patent/copyright.

    Yeah, yeah, offtopic, I know.

    --Knots;

    --
    Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
  198. Browsersaurus! by jxe · · Score: 1

    Or is there a trademark on that?

  199. Why?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, why, why, why, why?!?!

  200. Re:Legitimate infringement, but too little too lat by bwt · · Score: 2

    The suffix "-zilla" has entered the lexicon as a direct result of the Godzilla franchise.

    Of course, Godzilla uses the suffix "illa" which was popularized by a human predecessors known as the "gorilla".

    The bottom line in trademark infringement is that it turns on a "likely to cause confusion in the market". If you think the Mozilla software browser is likely to be confused with the Godzilla entertainment brand, then you have the intellect of a gorilla.

  201. Mozarella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so .... when will they sue cheeze....?

  202. you master of science - when does water boil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    could you explain to me in basic scientific terms how the heck you could OVERHEAT some coffee? McD had a pressurized pot or something like that? dunno what your retarded Fahrenheit-scale shows, but last time i checked, water could only be heated up 100 Celsius - then it boils and vapors up and a way in a nice and puffy cloud. you can heat steam up to where no man has gone before, millions of degrees Kelvin if you have some energy to spare, but WATER in its liquid form (and since coffee is 99percent pure water with some brown color its nearly the same) can not be heated up beyond its boiling point. finito, then it vaporizes and theres nothing more to burn your genitals with it. third degree burns are caused by temps clearly above 100Celsius. think about sitting in a campfire for ten minutes. but not 200millilitres of that poor little McD coffee.

    1. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by dalamcd · · Score: 1
      Who mentioned third-degree burns?

      You did, not the original poster(s).

      "severe scalding" is the phrase of import.

      OMG LOL PWNED SO HARD n00b

      dalamcd

      --
      moer liek CELtroid prime!!@1!
    2. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Because 100 celsius is overheated -- 78 degrees celsius is the usual tempature for storing coffee at home. McDonalds stored their coffee between 94 and 100 degrees celsius, while other restauraunts used a storage tempature between 83 and 89 degrees celsius.

      Go look it up:
      http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
      http: //lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm
      http://caoc.com/facts .htm

    3. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by cduffy · · Score: 1

      err, 78 is the usual tempature for serving coffee at home. oops.

    4. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Liquid at 180F (82C) liquid destroys skin within seven seconds. You just can't hand that to someone who isn't suitably equipped for hazardous materials--it certainly isn't food.

      Remember, liquid holds and conducts much more heat than air does. By your argument, you could safely stir boiling water with your hand, but the fact is you'll be horribly maimed if you try.

    5. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third-degree burns are what happened. The victim spent eight days in the hospital getting skin grafts. The QA manager who made this decision should have experienced his accomplishment firsthand, dipped a la Achilles.

    6. Re:you master of science - when does water boil? by jweatherley · · Score: 1

      you can heat steam up to where no man has gone before, millions of degrees Kelvin if you have some energy to spare

      I think you'll find that the steam will have broken down into seperate oxygen and hydrogen atoms before you get to the millions of Kelvin.

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  203. Re: .sig by WowTIP · · Score: 2

    Completely OT, but...


    An 800 pound elephant? Is that a baby elephant?

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  204. Prior art in the dictionary by realnowhereman · · Score: 1

    zilla \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    In other news, Egyptian Arabs are to sue Japan for constantly being destroyed by a *.zilla; their trademark clearly states is should be boiled and eaten.

    --
    Carpe Daemon
  205. Stargate SG3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TOho needs to sue the TOkra in stargate SG3.

    hollyweed vs. hollwoo

  206. GODZILLAAAAAAAUSTIN POWERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese Man 1: RUN!!!!! ITS GODZILLA!
    Japanese Man 2: It Looks like Godzilla But due to International Copyright Laws.....Its not.
    Japanese Man 1: STILL WE SHOULD RUN LIKE IT IS GODZILLA!
    Japanese Man 2: But it's not
    [Japanese man winks at camera]

  207. Will they sue Sepultura by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    for their 'Biotech Is Godzilla' song ?

  208. before Netscape there was Mosaic by NFW · · Score: 2
    I believe that's the root of the Mozilla thing. I also strongly suspect that whoever coined the term Mozilla probably knew about that the word Godzilla, and intended (however innocently - remember, this was basically a student project) to bring Godzilla to mind with the mention of Mozilla. I also strongly suspect that this person knew, or had reason to believe, that Godzilla is someone else's trademark.

    I also strongly suspect that this person just slapped his/her forehead upon reading about the case in question. It was probably an innocent mistake by a person with a sense of humor and no idea that anyone outside their little comp-sci community would see it... Oooops. Don't you just hate it when pet project get out of control and take a life of their own?

    One could argue that Mozilla now has a widely-understood meaning separate to Godzilla (especially considering that Microsoft sends a Mozilla string with every HTTP request), but it would take a lawyer to tell whether that's a meaningful defense. IANAL; I dunno.

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
  209. Fact of the matter... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    "Please be advised that your use of the GODZILLA mark constitutes a trademark infringement and confuses consumers and the public into believing that your "GODZILLA" character originates from Toho, which it does not. Moreover, your use of the "ZILLA" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "DAVEZILLA.COM" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client..."

    No.

    It does not.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  210. Butthead Toymakers by NFW · · Score: 2
    If I recall correctly, once upon a time, Apple had a project codenamed Sagan. Codenamed, mind you, not actually released under that name. Even so, a certain famous astronomer complained. The project was renamed "Butthead Astronomer."

    (I believe he complained again, and the name was changed yet again, but I'm not sure...)

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
  211. Good! Mozilla was a dumb name anyway by Sanity · · Score: 2
    This may look like a troll, but I assure you it isn't.

    I never liked the name "Mozilla" for a web browser, it might appeal to geeks - who might be amused by the Godzilla reference, but I very much doubt that it appeals to the general public.

    It may seem silly that something as trivial as a name can have such an impact, but just try telling a non-geek "Hey, check out mozilla dot org, it is a really great web browser", watch their reaction, and think about how likely they are to look at it based on its name.

  212. Re:Uh oh! (another) by KuNgFo0 · · Score: 0

    Carl: "Hey, I heard we're goin' to Ape Island."
    Lenny: "Yeah, to capture a giant ape."
    Carl: "I wish we were going to Candy Apple Island."
    Charlie: "Candy Apple Island? What do they got there?"
    Carl: "Apes. But they're not so big."

  213. Prior Art: Zilla is Hebrew by ninejaguar · · Score: 1

    Zilla is a name for shadow.

    According to this, zilla is a business-minded insomniac.

  214. Microwave? by Amata · · Score: 1

    would that count?

  215. examples of zilla saturation by Amata · · Score: 1

    Go!Zilla zillaclothing.co.uk (seems to be broken) gamezilla.com zilladesign.com zillasports.com (which has a dragon in its logo) trafficzilla.com (green godzillaesque lizardy thing for a logo) web-zilla.com etc etc etc so do they plan to fight every single one of those?

  216. An actual date from Mosaic v0.4 beta by Reziac · · Score: 2

    [fires up oldest Mosaic version I have, checks under "Help, About"]

    "Mozilla b0.4, Beta version 0.4, Sep 9 1994 at 16:59:43. Copyright 1994 Mosaic Communications Corporation, All rights reserved. win_cbug@mcom.com"

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  217. Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your use of the "ZILLA" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "DAVEZILLA.COM" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client, and demonstrates an attempt by you to trade on the goodwill built up by our client

    Disclaimer at bottom of front page:
    "The use of the "ZILLA" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA does NOT mean that this website is either associated with, authroized by, or sponsored by Toho, and it does NOT demonstrate an attempt by me to trade on the goodwill built up by Toho."

  218. Dear Pope, by kuroth · · Score: 1

    re: DAVEZILLA.COM
    Your Excellency:

    It has come to our attention that you have incorporated the "GOD" portion of our client's GODZILLA marks in the name of your "GOD" diety name. Please be advised that your use of the GODZILLA mark constitutes a trademark infringement and confuses consumers and the public into believing that your "GOD" character originates from Toho, which it does not. Moreover, your use of the "GOD" formative is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the GOD diety is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client, and demonstrates an attempt by you to trade on the goodwill built up by our client. As such, we request that you remove the objectionable imagery and reference to GODZILLA from your religion to eliminate any likelihood of confusion and posibility of an inaccurate affiliation with Toho and GODZILLA.

    We look forward to receiving your prompt reply, with a statement of your intentions, no later than August 16, 2002. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

    Very truly yours,

    SEYFARTH SHAW

    Jill A. Jacobs

  219. I knew this would happen eventually.. by brakzilla · · Score: 1

    I've been using this nick since '95! : (
    i even planned on getting brakzilla.com in a few months.

    --
    don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things
  220. Much work to do by funkwater · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. They claim they own the word "zilla"? Looks like Toho has a lot of suing to do.

  221. Re:LawyerZilla.com by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    Damn right it would be cool. They wouldn't know whether to sue it or bid for it!

    Ali

  222. Are you sure? by RedBear · · Score: 1
    If I produce a candy called "Ford Bubblegum", no one is going to think it's a car, or that I'm doing it with a license from the car company.

    I wouldn't be so sure about that, the way they are naming some of these new cars... ;-)
  223. DECzilla! by adagioforstrings · · Score: 1

    Here's an old quote:

    With a purposeful grimace and a Mongo-like flair
    He throws the spinning disk drives in the air!
    And he picks up a Vax and he throws it back down
    As he wades through the lab making terrible sounds!
    Helpless users with projects due
    Scream "My God!" as he stomps on the tape drives, too!

    Oh, no! He says Unix runs too slow! Go, go, DECzilla!
    Oh, yes! He's gonna bring up VMS! Go, go, DECzilla!"

    * VMS is a trademark of Digital Equipment Corporation
    * DECzilla is a trademark of Hollow Chocolate Bunnies of Death, Inc. -- Curtis Jackson

  224. Isn't it Gojira? by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    So even if the browser is borrowing a moniker, would it not properly be spelled MOjira?

  225. The letter about the *other* half... by mengel · · Score: 4, Funny
    re: Christ Church of God
    Dear Mr. Minister:

    ...

    It has come to our attention that you have incorporated the "GOD" portion of our client's GODZILLA marks in the name of your "Church of God" church name, and that you have included an unstoppable all-powerful being, which you refer to as "GOD", on your publications. Please be advised that your use of the "GOD" formative along with imagery associated with GODZILLA is likely to cause the users of your site to believe that the "Church of God" website is either associated with, authorized by, or sponsored by our client, and demonstrates an attempt by you to trade on the goodwill built up by our client.

    ...

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  226. In other news... by jjsjeff · · Score: 1

    God has claimed copyright infringement on the people claiming that they own rights to "Godzilla". He is also suing people that use the phrase "Goddamnit". You may, however, not be held responsible if you use the phrase, "Goddamit!", when using it in refererence to talking to telemarketers or your friends that owe you money.

    Suck on that Toho!

  227. Re:Hard to argue - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the "illa" trademark was STOLEN by Godzilla from "Magilla Gorilla", who stole it from Pancho Villa!

  228. Other uses of "zilla" -- emailed to Dave... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dave,

    Searching on 'zilla' at http://www.bartleby.com/ turns up:

    http://www.bartleby.com/162/index.html

    Author: Sinclair Lewis. Title: "Babbitt" Published: 1922. Specifically: NEW YORK: HARCOURT, BRACE & CO., 1922 NEW YORK: BARTLEBY.COM, 1999

    Description:

    The novel behind the name, Babbitt is Sinclair Lewis's classic commentary on middle-class society. George Follanbee Babbitt has acquired everything required to fit neatly into the mold of social expectation, except total comfort with it. Distracted by the feeling that there must be more, Babbitt starts pushing limits, with many surprising results.

    From what I can tell, 'Zilla' is the first name of one of the female characters.

    From chapter 10: http://www.bartleby.com/162/10.html

    NO apartment-house in Zenith had more resolutely experimented in condensation than the Revelstoke Arms, in which Paul and Zilla Riesling had a flat. By sliding the beds into low closets the bedrooms were converted into living-rooms. ....

    In other searches:

    Lea, Zilla Rider.: The Ornamented Chair: Its Development in America [1700-1890].
    http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/exchange-glanc e/Y01Y0107470Y7040194/qid=1029283594/sr=1-3/ref=ap s_sr_bdgw_z_3_3/002-5586454-7498459

    Judith Gorog: Zilla Sasparilla and the Mud Baby.
    http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/exchange-glanc e/Y01Y0060907Y1363369/qid=1029283594/sr=1-2/ref=ap s_sr_bdgw_z_3_2/002-5586454-7498459

    A Friend Like Zilla.
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0929 005716/qid=1029283594/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_3/002-558645 4-7498459?s=books

    Endothelialization of Vascular Grafts by P.P. Zilla, R.D. Fasol, M. Deutsch (Editor)
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/3805 545576/qid=1029283594/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_2/002-558645 4-7498459?s=books


    http://whitepages.com
    Seaching on "zilla" under "Last Name" / "Is Exactly" turns up 69 people.

  229. What goodwill? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want to associate themselves with Godzilla? Didn't you see the film?

    Dave, http://www.deep-trance.com

  230. not that it would stop them from suing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McDonald's, particularly, has a history of vigorously protecting their copyright. I saw a story on it on 60 Minutes several years ago. Particularly amusing was the lawsuit they had against a resturant/inn in Scotland called MacDonald's. The place was over 400 years old, and the owner of the place as a MacDonald. Actually, he was the MacDonald, the head of clan MacDonald.

    Large companies get their way cause they have lots of money and lots of lawyers, and the opponents, right or wrong, frequently cannot afford the time and money to fight a court battle.

  231. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  232. Re:Legitimate infringement, but too little too lat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course "Godzilla" isn;t really even "Godzilla" it's "Gozira". Back to the bickering.

  233. uhm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would appear MegaTokyo has been slashdotted.

    Horrible, horrible people...

  234. But 'zilla' has been coined by arcadum · · Score: 0

    From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

    Zilla \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.)
    A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant ({Zilla
    myagroides}) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are
    boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

  235. Toho's litigious history by Yair · · Score: 1
    I remember a New York restaurant being changed to "Monster Sushi" due to another Toho lawsuit.

    This and other dubious achievements are discussed here.

    1. Re:Toho's litigious history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can be as litigious as they like. They don't own all representations of dinosaurs or lizards. They can't attack the use of a "zilla" suffix by itself since it's part of the language.

      This would pretty much be like Disney deciding they own every possible use of a mouse image in any form and the name Mickey (Which by the way expires soon unless they get copyright law overturned).

      Basically it's a "fuck 'em" situation as far as I can tell.

  236. konqi breaths a fiery sigh of relief by Ragica · · Score: 0
    Thanking God them KDE fellows didn't do their usual trick name theirs Kozilla or even Kmozilla...

  237. Problem by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1
    There seems to be a common thread between:
    • GIF
    • JPG
    • *zilla
    In each case, the trademark or patent holder let the name be use for a lengthy period of time before taking legal action. This is a problem - there should be some limit.. such as, after a certain period of time, the patent/trademark holder is assumed to not care and waive their right to sue in that case.
  238. Damn lame corporations think they own everything.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not get the remaining 999 websites with zilla in their name together and some cool lawyer and file lots of lawsuits against them.. =)

  239. I've trademarked the word "God." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm now going to sue Toho for trademark dilution by their use of the name GODzilla.

  240. Mozilla means Little Girl in Spanish by Swordfish · · Score: 2

    Has anyone mentioned that Mozilla is a Spanish word?

    It's in the dictionary from moza = young woman,
    unmarried girl, maidservant etc.

    So it's pronounced: mo-seel-ya,
    or mo-theel-ya in Castilian.

  241. let's see it tested by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    No, I think you're right -- in a trademark dispute the prosecution has to prove that consumers might be confused and buy the wrong product. I don't think that's true in this case, and I bet if this comes to court it will be thrown out. It looks to me like one of those scare lawsuits that's never intended to come to court ...

  242. Colour coded ratings by xixax · · Score: 2

    Haven't you noticed? The hue of a discussion is based on a sophisticated algorithm that matches the nett rating of potty-mouth comments in an article against an RGB lookup table of faeces samples.

    Sort of like the hot-chillis you see in Eudora, but brown.

    Xix.
    (waiting for a baby-poo yellow thread)

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  243. Geez! by gordzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    With nickname like mine, should I be worried too? :-)

  244. Tengwar support in Mozilla by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Konqueror displays in just about any alphabet you want except Elvish

    OK, everybody with a bugzilla.mozilla.org account go vote for Bugzilla Bug 52746 - Mozilla does not support dynamic fonts and Bugzilla Bug 59611 - Add TrueDoc (or like) support to Mozilla. Without a solution to those bugs, there's no way to write text in a script that Microsoft or Apple doesn't recognize, such as the Tengwar of Feanor.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  245. More prior art - Ampzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a US hi-fi amplifier made and sold in
    the 70's or 80's with the name Ampzilla -
    it was powerful and got some decent ratings in
    the hi-fi mags... since this was not challenged
    the japanese co. should lose its rights from
    this case alone...

    please mod this up so the lawyers might notice it.

  246. Trademark Dilution by emkman · · Score: 1

    I guess you didnt read the Yoga Inside article awhile back on /. Even if the two items exist in completely different fields, a company can still feel they are being cheated out of the time and money they took to establish their trademark in any and all markets, according to the Trademark Dilution Act of 1995.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  247. zilla by Celeron1point2ghz · · Score: 1

    http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=zilla

    zilla

    \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.
    Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

    http://cancerweb.ncl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/omd?query=zil la &action=Search+OMD

    zilla
    <botany> A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs.

    Source: Websters Dictionary

    (01 Mar 1998)

  248. zilla by Celeron1point2ghz · · Score: 1

    http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=zilla zilla \Zil"la\, n. (Bot.) A low, thorny, suffrutescent, crucifeous plant (Zilla myagroides) found in the deserts of Egypt. Its leaves are boiled in water, and eaten, by the Arabs. Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

  249. ZKboi against ZKB by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    The same happened with the name "ZKBOI" against the swiss bank "ZKB". Because ZKB (three letters) are inside that name "ZKBOI" got sued.

    The case was won by ZKB but dropped after a few changes where made to the name. ZKboi is possible for example but not ZKBoi.

    http://www.zkboi.nu/zkb gives the details ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  250. Kevin Smith said it best by emkman · · Score: 1

    From Clerks: The Animated Series - Episode 6

    Carnie: Do you sell Band-Aids?
    Randal: Band-Aids is a brand name. The proper term is adhesive strips.
    Dante: The man is bleeding to death and your getting into a symantics argument?
    Randal: Man, name brand word association is one of the more subtle threats to this nation's free trade. It gives the larger well-known companies an unfair advantage. I'm doing my part to keep the playing field level by weening people off refering to generic products with brand names.
    Dante: Way to show some backbone.
    Randal: No spine of JELLO here my friend.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  251. Giant foot from sky lands on Japanese film co by alizard · · Score: 2
    While Toho [jp] probably can roll over Davezilla, if they go after Mozilla, they are going after Time-Warner-AOL(Netscape)... what happens if Time-Warner decides not to allow the broadcast of any Godzilla movie on any property they control, including on the air broadcasts from TV stations carried by their system?

    That's just the beginning. I'm sure that this empire can come up with other nasty things to do about them.

    Toho v Time-Warner-AOL = Bambi v Godzilla (an actual short flick, and another instance of lack of trademark defense)

  252. Defense by deanpole · · Score: 1

    Can't he claim he was spoofing mozilla, not godzilla? The dinasaur was red.

  253. 'Zilla this, 'zilla that by Bostik · · Score: 2

    As others have pointed out, the suffix 'zilla' has entered common speech. Kleenex, Xerox, Hoover, ... - Well, it's not the first one.

    Didn't Maxtor just name their gigantic hard drive Drivezilla?

    --
    There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
  254. Godzilla=Gojira (after kujira) by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

    Godzilla is a bad transliteration of the Japanese Gojira. The name seems to be inspired by other large creatures' names in Japanese; i.e. whale (which they kill for scientific purposes only, explaining why I can always go to my local supermarket and buy whale meat) is kujira in Japanese.
    This makes the case look like Kellog's trying to get an injunction against MGM's use of a lion logo for trademark infringement on Tony the tiger.

  255. There was already a case like this in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About Mobilix, a Linux tool and "Asterix" which is a comic.
    The latter sued the former because of the name but you can read all the matter in here:
    http://mobilix.org/mobilix_asterix.html

  256. Toho has got some work to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.google.com/search?q=*zilla%2C+-godzilla ...Thats 72,100 suits comming right up

  257. Umm... yeah. by torpor · · Score: 2

    It'll blue-screen before he gets to Hawaii...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  258. And that would be unusual how? by rakslice · · Score: 2

    Laying the smack down on a company just for trademark usage in their user agent string may seem a little far fetched. But keep in mind that US courts have found DNS entries to violate trademark rights in a number of cases. (And that's not even because the server could transmit the trademark-containing name, but only because of the IP address it replies with).

    They're both just as flimsy if you ask me.

  259. All Browsers Affected? by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

    Won't this affect all browsers, since they all (as far as I know) report themselves in their headers as "Mozilla comaptible"?

    Bob

  260. Mozilla already got their letter! by tdye · · Score: 2

    I have an exclusive copy on my weblog...

    [wink]

  261. Similar case by Hassan79 · · Score: 1
    Mobilix vs. Obelix.

    Mobilix.de: A german website about Unix operating systems on laptops, PDAs, smartphones etc...
    Obelix: A french comic character (ironically, one of the brave Gauls defending themselves against the mighty Romans :-)
    But -zilla is less common as a name suffix than -ix...

    --

    Don't drink and su! antidisestablishmentariazationally
  262. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire US glass and building industries have just announced their intention to sue Microsoft over the use of the word 'Windows', which, they claim, has been in use by the building industry for thousands of years.

  263. Godzilla vs IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I checked, there was a OS/390 system program named IGDZILLA. Who has more lawyers?

  264. What about GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about the Anglican church process those stupid guys from GODzilla for using GOD :-))

    This is starting to became surreal.

    Lopo

  265. History of the Mozilla name by Lface · · Score: 1
    ...but the term "Mozilla" has been associated with Netscape for a long, long time, even before the open source project.

    The Mozilla name seems to have been coined by jwz back in 1994 (see the 5 August entry). The Mozilla name seems to have been associated with Netscape longer than the Netscape name actually. At that time the company was called Mosaic Communications Corporation.
  266. ZZ Top? by pc7300 · · Score: 1

    So ZZ Top needs to change the names of Cad-zilla and Hog-zilla too?

  267. In related news... by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    Jehovah has issued a cease-and-desist letter to Toho demanding that they stop using "God" in the name "Godzilla"

  268. By the way ..... by martindp · · Score: 1

    God phoned in, he wants his name back.

  269. OT Re: .sig by moncyb · · Score: 2

    Aaahhh...you're right. When I first wrote it down, it was probably supposed to be 8000 pounds or so.

    Hmmm a baby elephant...like Dumbo. I've changed my sig to match something a Disney character would do. ;-)

  270. Oh no, there goes Tokyo by krypt0n0mic0n · · Score: 1

    I hope the Jurassic Park team and Blue Oyster Cult are wearing lead underwear!

    --
    http://page33.port5.com -- Spread the paranoia.
  271. I had a **Red Hat** way back in 5th grade!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which was in 1968 people ... I also had really soft small eraser which was called GUESS WHAT? ....

    yes it was called *that* ....

  272. Troll? Please. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Offtopic, yes. Overrated? Perhaps. Troll? I think not. I must have offended some ignorant "The Register" lover out there. God forbid that I should reply to somebody's stupid comment designed to brag to everybody that he reads some low quality web rag. Hell, there's probably like 2 stories a day from "Wired" or "Salon" on the front page, but nobody makes comments like that about those sites. I guess "The Register's" readers are less mature then the readers from those other sites..

    (Now that's a real troll, Mr. Moderator. Please take note.)

  273. Great American Sound Ampzilla by phr2 · · Score: 2

    It's kind of late to add this but I remember in the 80's there was an amplifier called Ampzilla (connoting its high power) made by the Great American Sound Company. IIRC, it had a dinosaur-like logo sort of like the Mozilla logo. It would surprise me if Ampzilla wasn't registered as a trademark.

  274. tohozilla.com! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, tohozilla.com's free. ;)

  275. Waaaaahhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up before I mod you down again for good measure.

  276. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I guess Thumbzilla's fucked...oh wait.