Slashdot Mirror


Buy a Segway... Please

aedunn writes "Wired has an article about everyone's favorite Human Transporter - Segway. Seems as though the company is looking at some hard times. Among other things, the article cites Segway's price, low speed and tightened spending in the corporate world as reasons for Segway's slow sales."

758 comments

  1. I think we all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    knew this was going to happen. It's the dotcom bubble all over again; useless products at high prices, with expectations inflated by hype and spin. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

    1. Re:I think we all by dead+sun · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nooooooo! This thing was going to transform our cities, remember? It was the end all be all to our traffic problems! It was to be the revolution for the pedestrian, quick, mobile, and versitile all while being small and able to fit in with pedestrian traffic. We're talking about a new paradigm in efficiency! A new model for transportation!

      Oh how I hate these days where people will gladly pay twenty thousand dollars for a vehicle that will hold them, their family or friends and other stuff like luggage or packages, all the while traveling 50 miles per hour down an open road, but refuse to give even a second thought to paying a quarter of that for a machine that will hold a quarter of the people, if you're lucky a quarter of the stuff, and going a quarter of that speed down the same road. I mean really, the price looks to scale nearly perfectly here.

      What a world we live in...

      --
      If not now, when?
    2. Re:I think we all by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can imagine trouble just carrying a spare tire, let alone 1/4 the "stuff."

      Really, it's silly. There is hardly a niche for this thing. For short distances I'd rather walk than have to worry about where I'm going to put the bluky scooter when I get to where I'm going. For longer distances a bike is more practical for it's greater speed and manuverability. And of course a 1970 Monte Carlo SS is way cooler for any distance. Zoom zoom.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    3. Re:I think we all by TuxPaper · · Score: 1

      Have I got a deal for you! There's something our there that goes 1/3 the speed of a segway, is 1/3 of the size, and you could probably carry at least 1/3 of the stuff (probably more!)

      It's called a human body. Everyone got one when they were born for FREE!

      Also, keep in mind that you can only go the speed of traffic. So if you are on a sidewalk, and everyone is walking 3 mph, you can only drive your fat segway 3mph.

      What a world we live in, indeed.

    4. Re:I think we all by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you are infringing upon the mazda trademark. Cease and desist!

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    5. Re:I think we all by Golias · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, dead sun. Some of us caught your sarcasm, even if most of those who replied to you here didn't. Had I been a mod today, I would have spent one on a "Funny" for you.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:I think we all by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the vote of confidence Golias. I'm not sure why such sarcasm has welled up from me on this topic today, but it seems like such a silly idea to try to market this thing to the masses.

      For the record I think TuxPaper caught the sarcasm given his comment, but I'm not totally certain. I had hoped that the excessive O's in No and all the exclamation points would have helped render it sarcastic though.

      Oh well, thanks for replying though.

      --
      If not now, when?
    7. Re:I think we all by bboombotz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All I know is when I saw the actual product, after all the hype, I just kinda stood there and thought... ok, what's the big deal.
      So did all my co-workers.
      Needless to say, I am not at all shocked that they are not doing that well. I dunno about the rest of you, but I cannot afford 5 grand for a powered wheely machine... and if I did have that much money laying around, that would be the last thing I would purchase.

      --

      Rob
      -----
      Got something on your mind?
      Post it.. we want to hear it!
      www.bboombotz.com
    8. Re:I think we all by timeOday · · Score: 1
      but refuse to give even a second thought to paying a quarter of that for a machine that will hold a quarter of the people, if you're lucky a quarter of the stuff, and going a quarter of that speed down the same road. I mean really, the price looks to scale nearly perfectly here.
      No, just being 3/4 slower cuts the value by 3/4. Holding only 1/4 the people cuts the value by 3/4 again. Same goes for cargo. So we're looking, at best, at (1/4)^3 = 1/64 the value here.
    9. Re:I think we all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'd like to introduce you to my friend "Mr. Sarcasm"

      Jackass

  2. this just in by trb · · Score: 5, Funny

    A company with an overpriced useless product and no business plan is having trouble surviving. Film at 11.

    1. Re:this just in by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, what do they think this is, the '90s?

    2. Re:this just in by rushiferu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey! In all fairness they do have a business plan:

      1. Overhype a useless product.
      2. A miracle occurs.
      3. Profit!!!

      I wonder what type of business degree you need to come up with such complex business strategies?

    3. Re:this just in by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A company with an overpriced useless product and no business plan is having trouble surviving. Film at 11.

      Actually, he had a business plan. He makes accessibility machines for people who are disabled. His stair climbing machine, Fred Estaire, gave rise to the name of Segway, "Ginger". The plan was basically this - selling Fred Estaires to disabled people restricts your target market. Ginger could be marketed to anyone, so the market would be immensely larger. The flaw is that this equipment is expensive to design and manufacture, which makes its price point well outside the range of what fully mobile people would consider paying for a simple vehicle. Disabled people will spend four figures on something that restores lost mobility and independence. Other people won't drop that much cash on what is for them a toy.

    4. Re:this just in by scoove · · Score: 2, Insightful

      overpriced useless product

      East/west coast yuppie people (I'm stereotyping, I know!) apparently don't seem to know that times are tough in other parts.

      As a broadband provider to part of fly-over country, I can attest that things are tight. I just had a fellow who's been overanxious for broadband to come to his town announce yesterday that he's "holding off, paying down a few credit cards, and taking it cautiously with the war coming and all the new taxes they're dumping on us."

      People have done an amazing job cutting luxuries, and are even tightning the belt on necessities. Tons of layoffs to bump stock prices and all the other factors have finally done their trick. It's ultimately self-defeating though.

      Certainly Segway knew it was a luxury item, right? (Yea, I know, "everyone's gotta have one" culture inside, right?)

      *scoove*

    5. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is the 00's. They can blame it on September 11.

    6. Re:this just in by bivouac_2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Disabled people will spend four figures on something that restores lost mobility and independence. Other people won't drop that much cash on what is for them a toy.

      This is the dead on truth. When I first saw the unveiling of the Segway my immediate thought was, "This will be great for the disabled" and NOT, "Wow I can't wait to ride on that thing!"

      Kamen erred in attempting to mass market an invention that occupies a niche in the entire scheme of things. Add to that fact design flaws like low top speed, crummy battery life and you have a piece of overpriced junk.

    7. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And boy, what that thing overhyped. Everyone was going to have one of these, according to the company when they made the product public. Yeah, right.

    8. Re:this just in by wfmcwalter · · Score: 5, Interesting
      No, they think it's 1985.

      Essentially they're selling a Sinclair C5 with one less wheel, no seat, at seven times the cost.

      It's an interesting marketing lesson, showing that neat technical features don't necessarily turn into value propositions that would make a customer actually want to cough up the money. Its amazon.com page tries in vain to sell it, protesting its uncanny ability to go backwards, go up slopes (gasp!), and even "self balance". The trouble is - people with fully functional legs can do all those things for free right now, and people without generally can't use a segway.

      And Dean - it's five thousand dollars!. I can wear my underpants on my head, shove two pencils up my nose and look like a maniac for free.

      --
      ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    9. Re:this just in by andrew_0812 · · Score: 1

      4. Rinse 5. Repeat

    10. Re:this just in by tgagnon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Disabled people will spend four figures on something that restores lost mobility and independence.

      Yeah, but how many disabled people can stand and balance well, but not walk? Sure, there may be a few...but I just don't see how such a device could really be that useful.

      It is definately being marketed towards the rich, lazy, white people of America.

    11. Re:this just in by me3head · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well,

      My mom has Multiple Sclerosis, and while she has some trouble standing up from a sitting position, she can stand just fine. Walking for any amount of time is, however, quite difficult. She uses a scooter type thing right now, so she has no use for one of these, but if she didnt have the scooter, I can see this being useful, especially if she lived in the city. She had to get her van retrofitted at a cost of $10,000 (gov't helped) to accomodate the scooter, and the scooter itself cost something like $5000. Since she needs to get around in the middle of nowhere, this is nescissary for her, but if she were in a densly populated area, it might be just the ticket.

      Mike

    12. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disabled people will spend four figures on something that restores lost mobility and independence. Other people won't drop that much cash on what is for them a toy.

      Many fat people, including geeks, drop five-figure sums on automobiles.

    13. Re:this just in by Lechter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kamen's wheel chair design is excellent and well worth the money for the disabled, since it gives them much greater access to the existing infrastructure by allowing them to climb stairs. And it lets look people in the eye too, which I guess is good.

      Unfortunately with all they hype, the statements that Ginger aka IT would "change the way future cities are designed," good ideas like the wheelchair were lost in the typical dot-com boom of investors trying to join the revolution. Unfortunately revolutions in urban design don't happen, cities are big and people don't like to redesign them very often. (I'd argue that this is why fuel cell/electric/gas/etc. cars will be a long time in coming.)

      The amazing thing is that people "in the know" about what "IT" were willing to join the hype. Oh, well just call this natural evolution in business...

      --
      credo quia absurdum
    14. Re:this just in by ryanvm · · Score: 5, Funny

      The plan was basically this - selling Fred Estaires to disabled people restricts your target market. Ginger [Segway] could be marketed to anyone, so the market would be immensely larger.

      No no no - you've got it all wrong. His plan was to get Ginger street legal in all the big cities. Once that happened and they became popular, Segway vs automobile accidents would skyrocket and he'd be rolling in invoices for the real moneymaker - handicapped transportation. Dean Kamen is a tricky, tricky white boy.

    15. Re:this just in by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      As a broadband provider to part of fly-over country, I can attest that things are tight. I just had a fellow who's been overanxious for broadband to come to his town announce yesterday that he's "holding off, paying down a few credit cards, and taking it cautiously with the war coming and all the new taxes they're dumping on us."


      I'm paying off everything this year, saving up some money and moving to Japan next year. For now, the plans are only temporary, but if anything particularly nasty happens in the US while I'm away, I don't think I'll be coming back.

      A lot of people are upset about the economy, new taxes, US policy, but they don't do much about it other than hold up some anti-war signs and pay the taxes.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    16. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dean Kamen is a tricky, tricky white boy.
      Just out of curiousity, this wouldn't happen to be an "Everybody Loves Raymond" reference, would it?
    17. Re:this just in by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Not really a reference. More like blatant theft of a line.

    18. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He asked how many, you say, "one." Is there any reason to believe it's a large number of people. Both my Dad and my step father have trouble walking and it's only going to get worse. Both have problems with muscle control (PD and something else I can't remember). Both have a hard time with balance and reaction speed. The Segway will not help them.

    19. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OT, sorry.

      I agree the US is going down hill fast, but Japan's not in the best shape. Since North Korea is talking about getting nukes it could lob at Japan, Japan and Taiwan have just started talking about building nukes too. Scary.

    20. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all fairness, they probably didn't think they needed a miracle, but I knew they did.

    21. Re:this just in by madfgurtbn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its amazon.com page tries in vain to sell it, protesting its uncanny ability to go backwards, go up slopes (gasp!), and even "self balance". The trouble is - people with fully functional legs can do all those things for free right now, and people without generally can't use a segway.

      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      The self-balance thing is what makes it different from the typical scooter that has a much larger footprint and turning radius, requires active balance by the rider, and generally prevents them from being used by anyone who doesn't have good mobility to begin with.

      I fail to understand the hostility in the responses to Segway. Is it really that threatening to people's sensibility that there might be a real alternative to driving cars on short trips or in places where it is too congested to drive a car. Wasn't it like yesterday that they started charging a usage fee for driving in downtown London? I think it was something like US$8 a day just to enter the busiest part of town in a car, and that doesnt' include parking it once you're there.

      I could be wrong with the figures but wouldn't a Segway pay for itself in a couple years if you could save $8 a day on that one fee alone? ($5000/8=625)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    22. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good riddance.

    23. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I fail to understand the hostility in the responses to Segway. "

      It looks stupid.
      Its the price of a decent (second hand) car.
      Battery power is ridiculous.
      Large&heavy, so hard to stow away once you get where you`re going.

      "wouldn't a Segway pay for itself in a couple years"

      A couple of years? A lot of people don't intend on keeping their cars that long. This is new tech - you think they`re going to be working in 2 years? Where can you get one - online? So you can't check them out first? How about repairs. Advertising the company might have helped - I'm pretty well read on this sort of thing and i`ve not heard about them. Well, I heard the name.

      Which bit didn't you understand again?

    24. Re:this just in by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Fuel cell, natural gas and electric cars may have various problems, but I've never heard that we'd need to redesign cities to accomodate them.

      The first two would need different types of gas pumps, but you could still use the same basic filling station design.

      Electric cars, at least as designed today, require charging stations everywhere. Santa Monica and some other "progressive" cities have tons of them, but I had a hard time finding one near the Capitol in Sacramento when I tried renting an EV there. Again, though, this doesn't require an urban redesign, just a few parking spaces with chargers.

      I saw someone out riding a Segway in my neighborhood in Woodland Hills, California. It seemed to work just fine on the sidewalk.

      So it doesn't seem to me like any of these innovations requires urban redesign. The Segway needs to be a lot cheaper for people to be interested, though, since it's nowhere near the total transportation solution a car is. It won't work comfortably in bad weather, and I go on a lot of trips more than 10 miles.

      D

    25. Re:this just in by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

      True dat, just wait until they micronize this. I think that if it were light, or had a killer battery time it would be good to go. But no battery time plus not transportable equals no go. It should be around twenty pounds, not the 70 or so that it is now.

    26. Re:this just in by madfgurtbn · · Score: 0

      It looks stupid

      So you are hostile to anything stupid looking?

      Its the price of a decent (secone hand) car.

      Most of the people I know drive $30k vehicles, so which is 6x the cost of Segway.

      Battery power is ridiculous.

      It is plenty to get you to work and back if you live less than 10 mi round trip, 20 if you can charge during your work day.

      Large & Heavy, so hard to stow

      A car is probably 300x heavier, and far more difficult to stow. You could park maybe 20 Segways in the parking spot for one Ford Exhibition.

      A couple of years? A lot of people don't intend on keeping their cars that long.

      Not sure what this has to do with your argument.? You might want to take a course in logic.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    27. Re:this just in by Uart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AH, but most of the market with enough expendable income to afford a Segway (upper middle class +) doesn't live in downtown london. They live in the suburbs.

      New Jersey/Long Island/Other Major Suburban Areas have alot more room, and most of the people living there own cars that are more than handy enough for getting here and there.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    28. Re:this just in by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know, "everyone's gotta have one" culture inside, right?

      The problem for Dean-o was that his product was too expensive. He (or his cronies) advertised it as a "revolution" (pun!) but it wasn't. Most people have no need for this product. For = $300 a large number of people might buy it. But not when it costs four figures. His product was supposedly this device which would change our lives forever, and frankly, I had visions of some sort of perpetual motion nonsense. I think most people were skeptical -- and then he releases it and I'm guessing most people were underwhelmed. Sure, it'd be fun to have one, but it's not a necessity in life, especially at it's opening price point.

      I think Dean-o got a bit too wrapped up in his own reality distortion field, and was too convinced he was going to change the world and be a national hero.

    29. Re:this just in by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      On a bicycle, easily. On foot, at half that speed easily.

      I could be wrong with the figures but wouldn't a Segway pay for itself in a couple years if you could save $8 a day on that one fee alone? ($5000/8=625)

      Or you could buy a really really nice bicycle for half that price (or a really nice one for under 1/5 the price). As an added bonus, you wouldn't be a fat lump looking stupid standing on a self balancing Jetsonesque piece of kitch.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    30. Re:this just in by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      If it doesn't go 0-60 in the 4-5 second range...I'm not interested.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So you are hostile to anything stupid looking?"

      I'm pointing out the hostility to it. But yes, personally I am.

      "Most of the people I know drive $30k vehicles, so which is 6x the cost of Segway"

      Most people I know spend £2000 or so on a second hand car. People who pay $30k for a car are quite unlikely to use a Segway.

      "It is plenty to get you to work and back if you live less than 10 mi round trip"

      Is this likely?

      "you can charge during your work day"

      Is this likely?

      "A car is probably 300x heavier, and far more difficult to stow"

      Why would you want to stow a car?

      "Not sure what this has to do with your argument.?"

      I'm implying that $5000 is a lot for a sort of old persons skateboard which may only last two years.

      "You might want to take a course in logic."

      You might want to work on your comprehension skills.

    32. Re:this just in by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy a really really nice bicycle for half that price (or a really nice one for under 1/5 the price). As an added bonus, you wouldn't be a fat lump looking stupid standing on a self balancing Jetsonesque piece of kitch.

      Just to get this straight--I am not going to buy a Segway. I have a very nice bicycle I ride all summer long, but I can comprehend the possiblity that some people do not want to ride bicycles on busy city streets or do not have the physical skills or stamina to ride a bicycle. Saying they should ride a bicycle because it would be good for them does not work. It never has, and most likely never will. Segway is an alternative for those who prefer not to drive a car for a 5 mile trip, but who will not or cannot use a bicycle.

      Why does that make you feel threatened enough to insult people on Segways?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    33. Re:this just in by PapaZit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My legs can carry me at 5mph for hours. If the time difference between segway and walking (~20 minutes) in a 5 mile trip really matters that much, I'll drive.

      This product is perfect for people who:
      -Need to travel 5-10 miles (any less and walking's less hassle and doesn't take much longer)
      -Are in enough of a hurry to use powered transport, but not so much of a hurry that they need to drive.
      -Are solvent enough to plunk down $5k IN ADDITION TO a car
      -Are environmentally conscious enough to bother using this instead of a car
      -Live in a flat area (hilly neighborhoods drastically cut battery life)
      -Live in an area that doesn't have regular rain or snow
      -Live in an area with either wide streets or well-maintained sidewalks
      -Can do their travelling in the daytime
      -Live in an area without a decent public transportation system
      -Lives in and travels to areas that provide a safe place to park a segway

      Here in Pittsburgh, there are hills, it rains a lot, it gets dark early this time of year, the roads are narrow and the sidewalks are often cracked, we have a good bus system, and the places that are close enough to reach via a segway don't have any good places to park the thing. I could afford one, and I like the concept, but it's just too much hassle.

      If they really want this thing to take off, they'll work with the parking authorities and malls to provide "segway locks" where people can leave their segways while they shop.

      --
      Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
    34. Re:this just in by tgagnon · · Score: 0

      Thats all I was trying to say...sure, it might be used by a few disabled people, but thats definately not the demographic it was marketed towards.

      I just think that scooter thing is just an overpriced, piece of junk. Sure, it might be cool, but so is a hovercraft...

    35. Re:this just in by LoadStar · · Score: 1

      I'd like to echo this with my own experience. I work approximately 6 miles from home. This isn't a great distance - it's about as close as I could possibly come to work, really - but it's already out of the range of the segway.

      In addition, the major road that I travel between home and work (I live on the same road that work is on, so it's a straight shot, so no, there really isn't another way I can travel) is a 2 lane road with no sidewalks, only a gravel shoulder on both sides with a drainage ditch next to that. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to ride a segway on conditions such as this.

      Lastly, I live in Wisconsin, and previous to the recent blizzard that blanketed much of the northeastern US, we were known as the "frozen tundra" for a reason. We get snow during the winter, and usually a decent amount of it. Trying to navigate a Segway through snow on the road and hoping some other car doesn't slide over and nail you doesn't sound like my idea of a good time.

      Those in larger cities like NY, LA etc, where you live and work in the same general metropolitan area and driving by car is impractical might find more advantage to a device such as the Segway - but then again, it is 80 lbs, making picking it up and stashing it in a cubicle or office difficult.

    36. Re:this just in by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how many disabled people can stand and balance well, but not walk? Sure, there may be a few...but I just don't see how such a device could really be that useful.

      You missed the point. He was talking about disabled people using Kamen's wheelchair, not disabled people using the Segway.

      If you haven't seen the wheelchair, look it up. It's incredible. In my opinion, it is a FAR more useful invention than the Segway.

      --
      bp
    37. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can walk 5 miles in 20 minutes?!? Do you have any concept of a mile? The 1 mile world record is around 3 minutes 44 seconds. If you can maintain a 4 minute mile for 5 miles go win some olympic medals. That's not a WALK, it's a VERY FAST RUN.

    38. Re:this just in by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I think the underlying message of the article is a lesson on knowing when to license the designs to other companies with existing manufacturing plants and when to do it yourself. All of Kamen's other designs were made by other companies. Since his factory is largely idle, it appears that so far he should have done what he did in the past.

      Maybe they can re-tool it and make it into an intelligent utility cart. Postal carriers still like walking because it keeps them warm in the winter and gives them time to sort mail. The big gripe is carrying around the bag. Turn the segway into a modern day pack mule and you solve the biggest complaint for the postal carriers. That and make the batteries easily exchangeable. Removing and replacing 8 bolts that could get lost isn't an valid option.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    39. Re:this just in by Golias · · Score: 1
      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      No. Almost, but no.

      However, a $100 bicycle can even carry you 12 mph for 5 miles.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    40. Re:this just in by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Troll
      Bitch
      Bitch
      Bitch
      Troll
      Troll
      Waka
      Wa ka

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    41. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But automobiles are actually useful and are worth the expense compared to this device. A simple bike would be much, much more cost effective than a segway.

    42. Re:this just in by Golias · · Score: 1
      Just to be clear, I hate the current crop of electric and hybrid-electric cars. That said...

      I've often thought that if electric cars ever became practical enough to catch on, I would want to open one of the first "battery swap" stations. Those who could afford it would simply drive into one of my stations, where a service guy would pull out their spent battery and drop in a fully-charged one, in about the same time it takes to fill up a tank of gas. It would certainly cost a little more that charging your car while parked at home, but not much more, and it could save a lot of hassle, especially for people who live in apartments or can't charge their car at home for other reasons.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    43. Re:this just in by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When arriving at the office sweaty isnt' an option, neither is a bike, I'm afraid.

      Just a thought.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    44. Re:this just in by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, it is a 1986 Porsche 911 Turbo, was raced before I got it, so, not sure if it is completely street legal...hehehe. I'm proud to say, that as of last tune up...I'm now up to 10 mpg!!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:this just in by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Hey, I thought I was the only one who thought of that. Everyone is always saying how hard it is to charge the electric vehicles, having to find an outlet, or time-consuming because batteries don't charge quickly. This option seemed the most sensible to me too. The driver pulls the car into the service station, the attendent uses an overhead hoist to pull out the very heavy 'battery pack' and put in a charged one, the driver pays and leaves. The battery is charged in the station, not in the car.

    46. Re:this just in by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      I didn't intend to insult anyone, just call attention to the fact that they looked stupid (riding Segways).

      As for "city streets," there is the bus, taxis, and possibly train transportation. Lacking the physical skills or stamina I can comprehend, but would these people be able to use a Segway? Perhaps some? How many then? Perhaps a small percentage needs these devices and would be willing and able to pay the requisite $5000. My point was for those that biking or walking is an alternative for.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    47. Re:this just in by slam+smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally think it's cool, just not $5000 dollars worth of cool. I'd start considering one if it ever got to $300-$500 dollar range. About the cost of a decent bicycle.

    48. Re:this just in by Kombat · · Score: 3, Funny
      My legs can carry me at 5mph for hours.

      Really? That's actually quite a brisk clip, you know. And "hours?" Sounds like you're in extraordinary shape. This begs the question: what the heck are you doing reading Slashdot??? :)

      Well, that, or you're lying.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    49. Re:this just in by slam+smith · · Score: 1

      A fully electric car requires quite a bit more battery capacity than one single car battery, Some designs carry several hundred pounds of batteries. Not to mention the fact that batteries are very expensive, and rather easy to destroy. You would have to be the Incredible Hulk to switch the batteries, and you would be taking the risk that you get some beat to hell batteries back, sorta like those propane tank exchange services. All the tanks in the lockers are beat to hell, and doing the exchange costs 2-3 times of just going to get the tank refilled. I think you would find the same problem with the battery exchange idea

    50. Re:this just in by Azureash · · Score: 0

      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      Yeah, you ass - IT'S CALLED JOGGING!!!!

      --
      Look at my karma - I'm bad, just like Michael Jackson!
    51. Re:this just in by Tassach · · Score: 1
      A moped will do everything the Segway will do for approximately 1/5 the price. A zero-emissions moped is still much less than 1/2 the price. It's a toss-up as to which one makes you look like a bigger doofus :-)

      Face it, segway is an overpriced tech toy, not a practical commuter device. As a consumer product in the current economy, it's doomed. I can see it being successful as a niche product for some industrial applications but that's about it.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    52. Re:this just in by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      A moped will do everything the Segway will do for approximately 1/5 the price. A zero-emissions moped is still much less than 1/2 the price. It's a toss-up as to which one makes you look like a bigger doofus :-)

      Mopeds are for the street. Mopeds cannot go backwards, nor can they blend easily with pedestrian traffic. They need probably 5 foot radius (?) for turning around.

      Segway can effortlessly blend with traffic of between 0 and 12 mph. I can ride my bicycle very slowly, but it is not fun and only physically fit people who are very good at riding bicycles can ride them very slowly. Mopeds would have an even more difficult time blending with pedestrians.

      Mopeds cannot go backwards. Many people in this thread have complained about the 80 lbs weight of Segway, but all the mopeds I have ever seen certainly weight more than 80 lbs. (I don't know much about mopeds, though.)

      I have seen video of Dean Kamen zipping around in his kitchen on a Segway grabbing things from the fridge and the cupboards, etc. Try that on a moped or a bicycle.

      It is incorrect to say that a moped can do everything a Segway can do, just as it would be inocrrect to say a Segway can do anything a moped could do.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    53. Re:this just in by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Agreed. IIRC, 3mph is the typical walking speed. 5mps is a brisk walk and maintaining that for hours, non-stop, is beyond the average American's abilities.

    54. Re:this just in by b!arg · · Score: 1

      I agree, it would not be a practical commuter device at all. How well does it go down slopes? I know here in Seattle we have quite a few of those pesky hills which can be VERY steep. Imagine a whole fleet of these things bounding down a Seattle or SF hill. I hope those tires are high traction too...the rain could cause some problems. "This is Chopper 5. There's a four-segway pileup on the Spring Street sidewalk, you'll want to divert your pedestrian traffic to University to bypass this. The cops are presently on the scene."

      This might make a good product for large companies in the suburbs with campuses (i.e. Microsoft). Need to get from building X to building Y really quickly? Hop on the company segway's and get there...almost like Flexcar for the campus

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    55. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar lesson, bitch.

      "Begs the question" means "To argue by assuming your conclusion is true." EXAMPLE: "This painting is trash because it is obviously worthless." Here we can see that the speaker is not presenting any evidence, simply asserting his point of view by restating it.

      You prehaps meant to say "prompts the question" or "raises the question". This mistake makes you look uneducated.

      - etosin

    56. Re:this just in by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      um, i live in seattle, i take the segway over the steepest hills we have (over 25% grade in some areas) and in the rain, it's fine. you can read about it in a million places here, http://www.bookofseg.com

      cheers,
      pt

    57. Re:this just in by malibucreek · · Score: 1

      Don't blame Kamen. In fact, he wanted to market the Segway as an assitance device for the diasbled.

      Trouble is, in order to do that, he has to go through a rather lengthy product approval process with the U.S. government, as that marketing plan would make the Segway a "medical device."

      Kamen decided he didn't want that hassle, or expense, so he opted to market the Segway as a general purpose transportation vehicle, figuring the *real* target market would see its appeal anyway.

      (This info comes from relatives in Celebration, Fla. -- Segway's "test city" -- who own Segways and have talked personally to Dean about his marketing plans for the vehicle.)

      --

      Why is it called COMMON sense when so few people have it?

    58. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mopeds cannot go backwards.

      So what? Why would you need to go backwards?

      Segway can effortlessly blend with traffic of between 0 and 12 mph.

      What roads do you have in your area that have a speed limit between "0 and 12 mph"??

      Many people in this thread have complained about the 80 lbs weight of Segway, but all the mopeds I have ever seen certainly weight more than 80 lbs.

      Mopeds can be chained up out front like bicycles. A $5000 Segway would need to be brought inside if you wanted it to be there later. Which is why I think the idea of selling these to the Post Office is stupid. The carrier would park it, climb the flight of stairs up to a Brownstone's entrance, drop off the mail, and *poof* the Segway would be gone when they came back out. (Along with how much mail??)

      I have seen video of Dean Kamen zipping around in his kitchen on a Segway grabbing things from the fridge and the cupboards, etc. Try that on a moped or a bicycle.


      Why?!? My LEGS work just fine. ANd they don't cost $5000.

    59. Re:this just in by Louis+Savain · · Score: 1

      Other people won't drop that much cash on what is for them a toy.

      True. In my opinion, Kamen has but one option left. He should turn his invention from the toy scooter that it is into a real road vehicle. All he has to do is make the wheels bigger, put an elevated passenger seat or two in the middle, add stick contol, lean-on-turns capability, collision bumpers and a gas powered engine and voila! The only problem is that I can't imagine this thing doing seventy on the freeway. But one never knows.

    60. Re:this just in by Golias · · Score: 1

      Design the cars correctly (for easy battery swappage), and a very simple hydrolic machine could be built to safely swap a battery under the operation of a minimum-wage High School kid. You're making it harder than it had to be.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    61. Re:this just in by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Mopeds cannot go backwards.

      Ye gods, that's a crisis! Imagine having to go down the street forwards, while all those other lucky bastards are spending most of their time walking backwards.

      I have seen video of Dean Kamen zipping around in his kitchen on a Segway grabbing things from the fridge and the cupboards, etc. Try that on a moped or a bicycle.

      Why on earth would I want to?

      It is incorrect to say that a moped can do everything a Segway can do, just as it would be inocrrect to say a Segway can do anything a moped could do.

      Fair enough. Mopeds can do everything useful that a Segway can do.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    62. Re:this just in by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You would have to be the Incredible Hulk to switch the batteries, and you would be taking the risk that you get some beat to hell batteries back, sorta like those propane tank exchange services. All the tanks in the lockers are beat to hell, and doing the exchange costs 2-3 times of just going to get the tank refilled. I think you would find the same problem with the battery exchange idea

      I don't think it's that impractical. A loading mechanism could be built that quickly inserts and removes the batteries. And with a credit card deposit or whatever you could "guarantee" that the batteries you traded in were in good working order - I am sure that the charging mechanism could detect that somehow before they were handed out to the next customer.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    63. Re:this just in by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      Maybe, but I'd be exhausted. A bicycle can help me do the same at less than 1/10th the cost, in a more env friendly way.

      Actually, I'd like to play with a segway, but it should cost 1k, not 5. I think that is about the cost the market will bear. If it is not enough to make a little profit, then this IS a product ahead of its time. =(

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    64. Re:this just in by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Your legs can carry you around at 3 mph all day. Most normal persons even working in an office walk more than 5 miles a day (a little at a time).

      The 12 mph is nice if the terrain is flat.

      Face it, the Segway is a neat toy and they should market it as such. I thought there were lots of rich people who already had everything in the US. The Segway should still make a killing.

    65. Re:this just in by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Well according to your map you take this over Aurora bridge. Huh? That's decidely non-hilly. Go up and down Capitol Hill or Queen Anne Ave or maybe even to 45th from Fremont Bridge then you'll impress me. And besides, why would you even think of commuting via car from Fremont to Queen Anne in the first place? That's what the bus is for. And it would be warmer and probably quicker. You can ride the bus (and in the future the monorail) for almost 10 years for the cost of buying a segway. It just seems like it's trying to fulfill a market that's not really there or is VERY small. Too long to walk, too short to drive. In the suburbs it's just too easy to drive. In the city it's just too easy to walk.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    66. Re:this just in by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      well- prepare to be impressed as per your criteria (you should visit my site there are pics and video of all this). i take the freemont bridge as well as the queen anne hill each day. sometimes i take a bike, car pool or even the bus, but so far the ht is the quickest way with the most flexibility. if you're in my area, feel free to drop me an email, i'll pop by and you're free to try the ht out if you'd like.

    67. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quote:
      ------------
      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      On a bicycle, easily. On foot, at half that speed easily.
      ------------

      Ah, that's a good one. 5 miles at 6mph is called
      running (or serious jogging if you are a snobish runner).

      I don't particularly like the segway but it's certainly not targeting those who use their commute as a good time to run.

    68. Re:this just in by subsonic · · Score: 1

      actually, it would be a great vehicle for students on large campuses (like me). But then there's the whole price thing, which is really the only thing holding the Segway back from entering the consumer market. Not to mention that Honda and Vespa seem to have cornered the "drive a hairdryer to class" market.

    69. Re:this just in by L0k11 · · Score: 1

      actually 10% of US citizens live in trailers... so much for a majority of the movies telling Americans and the rest of the world they really are wealthy enough to all live in the suburbs...

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    70. Re:this just in by PapaZit · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know that there are quite a few people who think nothing of running a 26 mile marathon, right?

      I know that this is Slashdot and all, but the skeptics doubting the ability of anyone to walk quickly for more than a few minutes is really funny.

      I walk about two miles to work and back every day. I've walked 15 miles without problems before. I'm overweight and can't lift much more than a 21" monitor. I can't run a block without getting winded. Only here would I be considered a model of physical fitness.

      --
      Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
    71. Re:this just in by Order · · Score: 1

      Can your fully functional legs carry you 12 mph for 5 miles?

      On rollerblades, yes.

      Rollerblades don't cost 5000, either.

      And they're quite practical.

      But not as practical as bikes..

      --

      I am a genius; therefore, you suck.
    72. Re:this just in by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i can get to work / home faster and safer on the segway ht than on rollerblades. i do like to rollerblade, but it's not a way to commute for me (8+ miles, seattle terrain, time needed).

    73. Re:this just in by cmacb · · Score: 1
      I fail to understand the hostility in the responses to Segway.

      I'm not sure its hostility. On the other hand for every product that is more hype than reality, there are probably dozens of products that get passed over by the type of "high voltage" people who market Segway. There may be a few thousand people in the world for which the Segway is just the right thing, and therefore worth the big price tag. The promise of it revolutionizing our cities however will never happen until the price is more approachable. In fact if the thing were under $1000 I'm sure it would sell millions just to people who were curious about it.

      If they are smart they will eat the development costs and sell the thing sooner rather than later at a price point that assumes they are selling 100,000 a year or so. Then, it might have a chance to revolutionize something.

    74. Re:this just in by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      it's really hostile, but that's always been true about most topics here.

      i think you're right...if they sell 1,000 that's $5 million, 10,000 segway hts, that's $50 million.

      who knows what's going to happen, but companies can have low marketshare (apple, bmw, etc..) and still do fine. the price can always go down, dvd players are almost free, many of us paid over $1000 when they first came out.

    75. Re:this just in by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Please place my comments back into context. Notice that I specifically said American's. Go look and see the percent of obese Americans. Stereotypes or not, I'm willing to bet a somewhat higher percent of the obese population are Slashdot readers. Just the same, such a task really is beyond the typical (average) American.

    76. Re:this just in by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1

      Here's the solution to both of your problems. Slap a 60 pound lead acid car battery in a backpack and rig a cable down to the Segway. Remove the batteries from the Segway, you have now just lightened it AND increased the power capacity...

      If you're really handy with a soldering iron you could strap a small electric generator to your back and REALLY increase the max distance...

      Surely I jest!

    77. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may never have been London, but you get also get the tube or a bus for a lot less than $8 a day. And you still have to park that stupid thing.

    78. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Troll
      >Bitch

      Valid point.
      Valid point.

      I agree with him/her - it's stupid!

      >Waka

      Waka/jawaka?

    79. Re:this just in by HyperHyper · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with madfgurtbn on this. People are stuck in the car world and cannot see what is happening to the environment as a result. I'm not going to go into detail as we've all heard it before but I do want to say something else. I'm amazed at the fact that so many people post their self-centered scathing comments and ask why would anyone choose to use this instead of walking? Have you taken a look at us North Americans lately? You can tell that most of us don't walk as often as we should (rampant obesity problems) and people tend to forget that there are a lot of people who don't have fully functional bodies whether is be old age, sport injuries or disabilities that have impaired people's walking ability. I'm quite thankful that I have full mobility as I love sports and pushing my body to it's limit. But I always pause and think about things when I see someone young in a wheelchair and wonder what kind of issues would I find by being in a similar situation. I'm just amazed that people who can be so smart and intelligent replies can forget that there are 6 billion other people on this planet and everyone has different priorities. If the product isn't for you, there is no need to lambast it. You can merely say "It's not for me" or "It's too expensive right now" and appreciate the fact that this product can/will enhance someone else's quality of life. My 2 cents,

    80. Re:this just in by Kombat · · Score: 1
      You know that there are quite a few people who think nothing of running a 26 mile marathon, right?

      Uh-huh, and they're extraordinary, too. What's your point?

      doubting the ability of anyone to walk quickly for more than a few minutes is really funny.

      The poster said "hours," not "minutes."

      I walk about two miles to work and back every day.

      That's not "walking for hours."

      I've walked 15 miles without problems before.

      At 5 mph? I doubt it. Nothing you've said here refutes my original point - anyone who can sustain a pace of 5 mph for "hours" is in extraordinary shape. I never said such people don't exist, simply that such a feat is beyond the capabilities of the average American.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    81. Re:this just in by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      The Budget Rent-A-Car guy actually tried to talk me out of renting the electric car. Only when I said "Oh, I'm just going to the Capitol and back" did he relent and let me rent the thing.

      It was the Honda that looks vaguely like a mini-SUV.

      Likes: It was quiet, whine of the electric motor a nice change over internal combustion growls. Acceleration wasn't bad.

      Dislikes: Handling lousy, not what I would have expected in a Honda. Battery life hideously bad, no other way to describe it. (In the 30-odd miles I went, I used up about 60% of the battery. Of course I am a notorious speed demon but my 14mpg Mercedes S-Class sedan can go about 300 miles between fillups).

      In the end, I have to agree with you. Even if your idea was truly workable, battery life is still way too short.

      Your idea sounds good if batteries were normally placed in accessible locations, but my impression is that they squeeze them into dark corners of the vehicle where it would be just about impossible to retrieve them. And they have to do that because otherwise the passenger cabin or cargo space would be filled with batteries.

      D

    82. Re:this just in by Wiseleo · · Score: 1

      I've skated from my home in Santa Clara to work in Palo Alto on several occasions. My Rollerblade E45s were upgraded with Bones bearings for higher efficiency. I was in good shape back then and still am.

      12mph I'd say was indeed the average speed. It took me just about one hour to reach my desk without too much effort.

      I consider this way of traveling to be very unsafe in retrospect. A bicycle that I bought later was safer and faster. It enabled me to arrive at work in a matter of about 35 minutes.

      Nevertheless, the speed of me getting to work by bike compared to my motor vehicle differed by only 10 minutes in morning traffic.

      --
      Leonid S. Knyshov
      Find me on Quora :)
    83. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that what they used to do in the Sudan?

    84. Re:this just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 mph for hours is extraordinary shape? That's twelve-minute miles. I'm a casual runner, I've run the occasional half-marathon, and I can run 12-minute miles all day long. Heck, my 10-year-old can run 12-minute miles.

      I'm seriously concerned about your physical health if you think spending 5 grand for this thing is a big win.

    85. Re:this just in by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      anyone who can sustain a pace of 5 mph for "hours" is in extraordinary shape.

      I'm sorry, but if you can't walk at 5 mph for hours (lets say 2) I would say that you are in bad shape.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    86. Re:this just in by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Hello,

      Yes I know about inequality in the US. Apparently the 30,000 most wealthy families there earn as much as the 20% poorest people. There are families whose income is over $17 millions a year. Staggering.

      Still Segway should be able to find a market.

    87. Re:this just in by b!arg · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you'll see this, but I did see the news report on King 5 last night. It was fairly impressive actually. I liked the end when you just zipped up the hill. I may have to reverse my opinion on it. It could be very useful indeed...still think it's a tad spendy, but if it comes down at all it might be an interesting thing.

      --

      Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
    88. Re:this just in by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      heya, yah the news crew came out. it was fun. if you'd like see one in person and get a demo ride-- just drop me an email, i'll arrange a time. thanks for the open mind, it really is quite useful. the price will go down, if the technology succeeds. cheers.

  3. Read about 'em by giminy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tis a shame that the economy has hit a downturn, but there's an interesting site that a happy owner has up, about how he's losing weight and saving money with his: The book of Seg.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    1. Re:Read about 'em by tbmaddux · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...interesting site that a happy owner has up, about how he's losing weight and saving money with his...
      He's only got a 7-mile 1-way commute, and while he asserts he "cannot use a bike" for his commute, he provides no reason why. He'd lose more weight and save even more money if he biked.
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    2. Re:Read about 'em by jjjefff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      so... he talks about saving $582 so far, and then mentions that $490 of that is from not having to pay a car payment or insurance... even neglecting the fact that he's only ridden it half a month but is including the whole month's car fees, is anyone else out there crazy enough to believe that a segway is actually a good replacement for a car??? a segway is a replacement for fat people's legs and staminas. not for a car.

    3. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's an interesting site that a happy owner has up, about how he's losing weight

      How can he be losing weight when he's so lazy he spent thousands of dollars on something so he doesn't have to be bothered with WALKING?

      Oh, right, no money left to buy food. Never mind.

    4. Re:Read about 'em by Junky191 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You do of course know that this site is paid advertisment for the segway- this guy is a paid spokesman. Its amazing how advertisements are passed off as news or something else more and more often these days, and noone seems to notice.

    5. Re:Read about 'em by Spunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've seen that site before, and frankly it reeks of astroturfing.

    6. Re:Read about 'em by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thank you for that link. I really hate to do this to the guy, but:

      This is some video of the thing actually working. He did an interview for his local news station. It's an 18.5 Meg .WMV, though... (and no, I can't get mplayer to play it :-( )

      I'll probably get death threats from him for posting that direct link, but it's REALLY damn cool actually seeing the thing work and move and all that. Y'all really need to see that. I think I'm gonna bag that idea of a trip to the Keys and save up for one of these instead...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    7. Re:Read about 'em by jcknox · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Gee, I accomplished the same thing buying a $2000 scooter: I pay no insurance, tags, or taxes. It consumes less than $2 per month in gasoline. Plus, it goes 30 mph (the max legal speed for a 'moped' in my state), has room for books, etc. under the seat, and I can sit down.

      Cheap transportation is not a new concept.

    8. Re:Read about 'em by TheMightyZog · · Score: 1

      I was curious why he doesn't use a bike myself and in fact he does give a reason, just not on that page. Try this page.

    9. Re:Read about 'em by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tis a shame that the economy has hit a downturn

      No, don't blame the economy. It's much trendier to blame "global geopolitical conditions" for poor product performance.

      (BTW, the economy's growing healthily; better to blame the stock market.)

    10. Re:Read about 'em by suicidal · · Score: 1

      ...in seattle we get 82% of our power from hydropower, seattle does not have coal or nuclear plants--it does get other power from other areas which do for the remaining percentage.

      Because those nuclear emmissions are really killing the air quality!

    11. Re:Read about 'em by SlipDisc · · Score: 1

      it plays fine on mplayer here.
      version 0.90rc4-2.95.4

    12. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From his site:
      "the segway ht creates zero emissions"

      So the electricity to charge it is generated by magic pixie dust?? More likely it is generated by burning COAL or Natural Gas.

      What a tool.

    13. Re:Read about 'em by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      MPlayer 0.90rc2-3.2.1

      Hmmm... Maybe I don't have all the libs installed. I'm on Gentoo and that's the "current" version in portage. Thanx for letting me (and us) know!

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    14. Re:Read about 'em by superdan2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the dumb bastard would have lost more weight and saved more money by just going out and buying a bicycle!

      Jesus, this thing reeks of being a marketing site paid for by the company...

      --
      blog |
    15. Re:Read about 'em by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Funny
      He'd lose more weight and save even more money if he biked.
      And probably smell bad.
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    16. Re:Read about 'em by Bishop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looking at him I would say that he would have gained weight if he had bought a bike. There is nothing like a little exercise in the morning to build up the muscle mass in a hurry.

      For the price of a segway he could have bought a really nice recumbent bike or trike. Or save a bundle and buy used.

      Before anyone jumps down my throat: If you can stand for 7 miles on a segway you can ride a bike for the same distance. 7 miles may seem like a long distance, and it will be for the first 2-4 weeks. But it won't be long before you have the muscle mass to do twice that without breaking a sweat.

      I just re-read the specs on the Segway and they suck. Now that I am in some what decent shape my top speed is twice that of the Segway. My regular "cruising" speed is 50% faster. And I probably can beat the Segway's best case max range of 15mi/25km on an empty stomach.

      If you are a person with a disability limiting your mobility I can see a need for a Segway. But for the rest of us a bike commute is not a problem.

    17. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I save over $1,000,000 a year by not having a private jet. This reminds me somehow of the "how to get in the not-farming-soybeans business" joke.

    18. Re:Read about 'em by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      hi, you're nuts.

      bookofseg.com is my site. i don't work with or for segway in any way, read my site (the about section) email me or call me up.
      cheers,
      pt

    19. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I live right by where this guy lives.
      I bike with a laptop. About 5 miles.

      It's a pain in the ass, multiple hills, safety-wise VERY bad narrow busy streets (don't know his route or if a Segway would be "safer").

      The only reason I can bike is that right next to my office is a gym with a shower. Still, I have to carry all my work clothes folded up with my laptop so if I have an meeting with "importants" for which I have to look my best, car is required.

      Busses are luck of the draw, sometimes it can take an hour to go those five miles (if you need a transfer).

      Would a Segway solve this? Don't know, in Seattle you'd still get rained on. But it's better than buying a new car...

    20. Re:Read about 'em by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      you should read my site (i do use a bike) but not all the time. distance with cargo, i need to be dressed up, no showers where i work, etc...feel free to email me if you want / need more info.

    21. Re:Read about 'em by ptorrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i got around 8 miles, it tackles the hills fine, i take sidewalks, alleys and roads...i get to work 15 minutes faster than i did with my car. the segway ht isn't for everyone, works great for me though. i do bike in when i don't need to be dressed up or on weekends. it's all about lowering the total number of car trips, everyone here seems to think if it's not for them, it's not for everyone, the world isn't black and white. i took a car in the other day, the segway or a bike or a car isn't a religion, it's a daily choice, the more choices the better.

    22. Re:Read about 'em by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      From his webpage:

      bicycles? many people have emailed me and asked "why don't you just use a bicycle?". i agree. if i could i would, i really like bicycles- but for me, they're for exercise and fun, not a commute which isn't very bike commute friendly which mine is. here's why- i go over huge hills in seattle, most cyclists out here walk their bikes up 2 of the hills i need to go over, i would need to do the same _and_ i have a pretty big load to haul (a couple laptops and equipment). i also meet with clients and need to be somewhat dressy, so showing up sweaty and a huffy mess isn't an option. if there were showers and i had the time, i would use a bicycle, but since i don't the segway ht has been a much better option than a car, and since a bike doesn't really make sense for me the ht has fulfilled my travel needs. if you can use a bike to get to work and enjoy it, that's the best solution.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    23. Re:Read about 'em by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
      NO! You liar! bookofseg.com is my site! I'm paid millions by the segway people to spout all manner of drivel!

      I confess!

      I'm sorry!

      Please forgive me!

    24. Re:Read about 'em by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      Whaddya expect? Arthur Andersen did his accounting!

    25. Re:Read about 'em by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      It was funny (at least a little ) to see him almost get side swiped by a truck as he crossed the street.

      I can't wait to see the next cop chace tv show or movie where someone comandeers one of these to chase the bad guy...

    26. Re:Read about 'em by meme_police · · Score: 1
      Hmmmm, not one single criticism, made me gag when I realized how blinded by love the guy is.

      He mentions that he can't ride a bike, yet he never explains why.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    27. Re:Read about 'em by beaverfever · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "He'd lose more weight and save even more money if he biked."

      He'd definitely lose more weight, but as for the money (and time), it wouldn't be as clear-cut as you suppose. It would depend greatly on the practical lifespan of a segway, which I suppose is still an unknown, and the cost of charging it, which, from what I have read, isn't too much.

      Commuting by bicycle over a medium/long distance gets you to a point where you'd probably want a higher quality bike, some decent riding clothes (they do make a difference), and a means to clean up before getting into the office (showering in a nearby gym, if there is one, for example), and then there's regular maintenance to the bike, all of which add to the cost.

      Also, I'm willing to bet money that most office buildings wouldn't have a problem with someone bringing a segway into their office, but for some reason it is a sin against a higher god to bring a bicycle into many buildings, so having a secure place to keep a bike when commuting is an issue.

      Not that I think riding a bike is a bad idea; I did it almost every day when I lived in california, 1:10 each way, and I loved it (driving, with traffic, bridge tolls etc. took about :45). It wasn't uncommon to not touch my car a week or two at a time. However, the weather in california is very predictable and not a concern for bike commuters. I'll admit that living in the pacific northwest has made me less enthusiastic about riding that much every day.

      Right now (once I find a decent job!) I would definitely consider a segway as a 'second car' for myself and the gfriend, as the fella with the site did. I can't see it being good for long distances, but short/medium, it would be perfect.

    28. Re:Read about 'em by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Of course. Everyone knows nuclear power hurts the environment much more than damming rivers and flooding miles of pristine valley wilderness.

    29. Re:Read about 'em by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      No, he does explain. There are hills, and he doesn't want to get sweatty on the way to work. Has to meet customers and stuff. I can understand that. But personally, I would worry more about rain that sweat, and would prefer a moped to the segway.

    30. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he'd lose a lot more weight if he biked *and* started eating Subway. Look out Jarrod!

    31. Re:Read about 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I accomplished the same thing buying a $2000 scooter: I pay no insurance, tags, or taxes. It consumes less than $2 per month in gasoline. Plus, it goes 30 mph (the max legal speed for a 'moped' in my state), has room for books, etc. under the seat, and I can sit down.

      Yeah, but the daily beatings certainly have to negate any cost savings.

  4. It's no wonder by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What a time to try selling these things, right when the Northeast US has been hit by blizzard-like snows. Not so Segway-friendly, I imagine. Probably the #1 reason why I thought they were a bad idea in the first place.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:It's no wonder by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?
      I should make a small plow to hook onto the front. then my son can make bank clearing neighbor's sidewalks and driveways.

      it could be a whole new "lemonade stand" industry...

    2. Re:It's no wonder by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

      > it could be a whole new "lemonade stand" industry...

      I think the startup cost for that business would put your son in the hole for the next 5 blizzards. At least with lemonade, the startup cost is offset after the first couple of sales.

  5. Perhaps by Duds · · Score: 4, Funny

    People don't like wobbling down the sidewalk looking bloody stupid after all.

    They might as well give away a big red hat that says "Tool"

    1. Re:Perhaps by antibryce · · Score: 4, Interesting
      People don't like wobbling down the sidewalk looking bloody stupid after all.

      They might as well give away a big red hat that says "Tool"


      So how exactly do you explain that stupid scooter phenomenon a couple years ago? Personally, I'd love a Segway, but I'd need mass transit to get me the rest of the way. Then I wouldn't need a car at all.

    2. Re:Perhaps by Duds · · Score: 1

      You wore a helmet. No-one saw your face :P

      --

      Yeah I agree though, historically the segway is probably closer to the Sinclair C5.

    3. Re:Perhaps by PaschalNee · · Score: 1

      Must be a regional thing. People around here fork out 4 euro plus a pint just so that they can "wobble down the sidewalk looking bloody stupid ".

      Agreed the hats probably would not sell well.

    4. Re:Perhaps by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      You mean like the Razor scooter, or a moped like scooter? If you mean the Razor, they cost fifty to a hundred bucks, and were ridden by kids. No comparison to the segway at all. If you were refering to a moped scooter phenomenon, I missed it.

    5. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. The only people over 12 years old that I ever saw on a razor scooter were people making fun of them (see Zoolander, Big Brother skateboarding videos)

      Mopeds are popular because they are cheap car replacement for college kids. My girlfriend bought a decent one for 800 bucks. If you have 5k to spend on transportation, you'd be an idiot to pick a segway over a motorcycle or used carr.

  6. Shocking! by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Gee, a company producing an overpriced, overhyped scooter of dubious legality for city use is having trouble selling it? What an utter surprise.

  7. How about the fact... by glrotate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That they're rather pointless and only marginaly more usefull than a $50 bike?

    1. Re:How about the fact... by FosterSJC · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This comment is insightful, but I would like to point out that they are really marginally less useful than a bicycle. First, see this article. Segway was banned in San Francisco... bikes were not. While you cannot ride your bike on a sidewalk, they are much more convenient for street travel than SHT's. A bike is more cheaply and easily repaired. While you can't go riding a bike around the office, I am SURE that your employer would not permit you to drive one of these things around indoors (unless of course you work in a Boeing hanger or something). You don't need a training class with Dean Kamen to ride a bike.

      That doesn't mean they aren't really cool. But I bike is infinitely more practical. We wont see mountain-segways anytime soon, and if I can't ride it in the park, I don't want one.

    2. Re:How about the fact... by redNuht · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. That's exactly why bikes are *the* HT of choice in Southeastern Asia. In some cities almost every single individual uses a bike every day. It's kinda like Kamen's "dream", but much cheaper and healthier.

    3. Re:How about the fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You don't need a training class with Dean Kamen to ride a bike.
      No, you need several months of training wheels and grazed knees, with supervision from your parents. Segway wins hands down on the training requirement...
    4. Re:How about the fact... by eg0n · · Score: 1

      no one ever taught you how to ride a bike? i'm impressed.

      --
      i just climb trees, and look for rhythm everywhere.
    5. Re:How about the fact... by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ug. never buy a $50 bike. It'll fall apart incredibly fast. Go to a reputable bike shop and spend $300-$400 on a real bike.

      They'll last much longer. I rode a walmart bike to pieces in one day- returned it and got my money back. I went to a bike shop and dropped 3x as much on a Schwinn (before they sold out to Pacific Bicycle- the new schwinns are crap.), and I've beaten the hell out of it for 100's of miles with only one major problem, that the bike shop fixed for free.

      BUY A REAL BIKE.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    6. Re:How about the fact... by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      Oh come on now, did you know that you actually have to pedal a bicycle yourself? It doesn't just move except when you're on a slope downwards. And lets talk about the balance of a bike. Does it automatically correct your balance for you? I think not. I've seen plenty of kids tip themselves over, run into trees, what have you.

      Sure your bike may have a little bit more range than the Segway, or a lot if you're in good shape, but who needs to travel more than 5-15 miles away from their home anyway? Err... half that, you have to make it back too. So who needs to travel more than 2.5 to 7.5 miles away from their home?

      What's that, you'd like to make a bunch of trips that size in succession? Well with a bike you'd be winded, you probably couldn't do it. With the segway, well, just run it down and come back and plug it in, you get a nice breather between trips. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 4 hours if you listen to the creators. Plenty of time to rest between those errands. You certainly wouldn't be exhausted after that rest, even if you had to pedal the Segway, which you don't!

      And it's good for self esteem too. You won't have to feel bad when you can pedal no further anymore. Now you can blame the limited life of the batteries for why you can get no farther. Ah, won't it be great when the Segway finally arives and makes all those silly, manual labor bike things obsolete?

      --
      If not now, when?
    7. Re:How about the fact... by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      No one 'taught' me how to ride one. I watched my older sibling riding theirs, while I was riding my tricycle. One day when I was 3 or 4, I picked up my sister's bike, straddled it, put one foot on the pedal, and started riding. I did this in the garden so if I fell, I would land on soft dirt. What's so difficult about riding a bike? Once you get over being afraid of falling, it's simple, and that was the first thing I took care of by being in the garden.

    8. Re:How about the fact... by Anitra · · Score: 1

      I bought an $80 walmart bike last summer, because I'm a poor student whose more expensive bike (my only form of transportation) had just gotten stolen! I had to drop another $50 and 4 hours into it before it was really rideable. Even then, $130 was really MORE than I could afford, but I needed something to get me around.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    9. Re:How about the fact... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig: You are not as cool as you think you are.

      Look in the mirror buddy.

  8. Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have been saying since day one that this is one of the worst inventions I have ever seen. I'd love to see a segway owner try to get around Manhattan this week. The only value I have seen in something like this is possibly for mailmen who normally walk their route or in large warehouses. Those are pretty niche groups and I don't see anybody making a huge profit from them.

    1. Re:Thank God by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      What about the person who drives round to the shop 10 mins away by foot?

      How about for Uni/college students to and from dorms?

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    2. Re:Thank God by groove10 · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a college student (still), I really have no idea where I'd leave this thing either on campus or at my dorm/apt. It's not like you can just lock it up to a bike rack or something since it takes up quite a bit more space right? Most college students are capable of riding a bicycle if the distance they need to travel is more than walking range, and most within walking range would prefer to walk I assume.

      I must say that I agree with the above posters who say that there really isn't a wide market for this product.

      --
      MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
    3. Re:Thank God by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      How about for Uni/college students to and from dorms?

      Try to find a student that legitimately has the cash and a real need for this, and you'll be looking a long time, I think.

      I don't know about where you live, but where I am, it's only a 15 minute walk at most to the other side of campus, and shuttle buses run to and from the dorm/apartment areas to the academic side all day.

      Add to that the uncountable number of people with rollerblades, skateboards, and (techinically illegal on campus sidewalks, you think Segways wouldn't be?) bicycles, plus a fanatical campus security department.....I just don't see Segways invading anytime soon.

    4. Re:Thank God by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      What about the person who drives round to the shop 10 mins away by foot?

      This happens only in areas where parking is easy to come by... try that in NYC, where you lose your parking spot as soon as you drive out of it, and you'll learn real quick to just walk to the shop. And the lazy people who do this aren't the type who'll want to lug a 76 pound scooter down a few flights of stairs. Car keys are a lot lighter.

      How about for Uni/college students to and from dorms?

      How many college students can afford a $5,000 scooter? I'd rather have a $3,000 used car that I can drive with friends than a $5,000 one person scooter.

    5. Re:Thank God by LoadStar · · Score: 1

      Most college campuses that I've seen are extremely bicycle friendly. The college I went to had bicycle racks - usually multiples of them - available at every building. Sometimes every entrance. The residence halls provided bike lockers as well, so you wouldn't have to store your bike out in the elements.

      The two years I was in the res halls I didn't own a car at all. I either hitched a ride to and from campus, or took the shuttle bus that ran between the nearest large city and the college campus (approximately a 40-45 minute bus ride, no stops). Once on campus, my bike got me pretty much anywhere I needed to go - between class and the res halls, or to the food store, Wal-Mart, Staples, and such.

      I can't see for most campuses any advantage to buying one of these, aside from paying an extra several thousand dollars for the self-propulsion that the Segway has.

    6. Re:Thank God by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      The Segway has a key, it won't move unless you have one in the "ignition." And it's darn heavy too.

    7. Re:Thank God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large warehouses use golf carts.

      Cheap, and fit nicely in the typical warehouse aisle.

  9. No surprise by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who did they think would by one of these? Corporates? Until suits see everyone else riding one they'll keep away. Suburbanites? They wont get you anywhere - you need an SUV to travel. Kids/Students? Can't afford it. Urban? Sidewalks are too crowded, and too slow for roads.

    Basically, imagine the limited marketshare that scooters/rollerblades/skateboards occupy (as transportation, not as stunt vehicles), then make it way more expensive.

    1. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could spend US$ 100000000 engineering an electric scooter to balance on two wheels or you could spend $ 80.37 engineering on a third or fourth wheel. Which would you choose?

    2. Re:No surprise by apg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Basically, imagine the limited marketshare that scooters/rollerblades/skateboards occupy (as transportation, not as stunt vehicles)

      Aw, come on. You know ESPN2 is already planning "Extreme Segway" complete with half pipe and Segway street freestyling.

    3. Re:No surprise by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      segway half pipe would be rather dangerous...imagine when you fall in the air and an 80 pound brick of plastic falls on top of you

      ouch!

    4. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, and BMX half-piping is all kittens and flowers?

    5. Re:No surprise by JesseL · · Score: 1

      Nobody gets into "extreme" sports because they think it's safe. Ever seen freestyle motocross? Jumping 50+ feet in the air with a 200lb motorcycle doesn't sound too safe either.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    6. Re:No surprise by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      scooters/rollerblades/skateboards occupy

      those items aren't for the elderly or fat, lazy fucks...
      Everyone wants one, even if they don't admit it and they will do so when the price drops....someday.

    7. Re:No surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Everyone wants one, even if they don't admit it and they will do so when the price drops....someday."

      Oh, yes! I can't wait until the price drops so I can get one and cruise for babes with it!!!

    8. Re:No surprise by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      Actually, the danger is part of the appeal for these personality types. Hell, ever heard of BASE jumping? Effing Insane.

  10. This will change the way we build cities! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Hi, I'm Steve Jobs. Apple bought me a nice plane, and I return the favor by renting it back to them! I hope they buy me a Segway, so I can rent that back to them too! I was hoping those cheapskates would give me one after I said something nice about them, but no dice. Those things look really useful for crowded sidewalks - why, I could take up the room of 3-4 people and be going just as slow!

    Hey, I only make $1/year! Gimmie some toys!

  11. I almost bought one... by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I almost bought one and then I realized that I could get a bicycle for a fraction of the cost.

    And it is more fun to recharge the power source for the bicycle.

    Seriously... How lazy can people be? They should give these things away to people that buy Hummer H2s (read:idiots).

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:I almost bought one... by UTPinky · · Score: 1

      "and then I realized..."

      What kind of bikes were you looking at?!?

      --
      I'm only paranoid because everyone is against me...
    2. Re:I almost bought one... by Pii · · Score: 0
      What's wrong with the Hummer H2, and what about it would make the buyer an idiot?

      Is it that you can't afford one?

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    3. Re:I almost bought one... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I almost bought one and then I realized that I could get a bicycle for a fraction of the cost.

      The question is...DID you actually get a bike, and do you ride it?

    4. Re:I almost bought one... by tgagnon · · Score: 1

      Exactly...its basically a glorified bike...I mean, I don't see how you could actually lose a significant amount of weight just standing on that thing when you go to work.

      Its nuts to think what our society has come to where a $5000 bike is supposed to be change the way people travel.

      IMO, someone should invent a shoe or something that makes people want to walk instead of want to be lazy asses.

    5. Re:I almost bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah thats kind of an irrelevant comparison.

      I'm sure the poster is one of the doofuses who feels the same way about all SUVs or any vehicle bigger or more expensive than the 5 year old honda civic he drives.

      And he's probably one of the eco-dipshits who cites gas mileage, and blames suburbanites for all of the worlds problems. Yet his vehicle is probably so poorly maintained it gets half the mileage of my 2 year old Jimmy (which btw to all you eco-dopes, gives me a respectable 22 mpg)

    6. Re:I almost bought one... by DohDamit · · Score: 1

      Hummer H2: Just when you thought a normal SUV was proof enough that people have way too much money to waste on things they don't need or use, along comes this beauty(well, ugly block of metal.)
      Confess. Don't you feel a little stupid defending people who buy these things? Could I afford one? Sure. Do I want to? Do I need to? Hell no, on both counts.

    7. Re:I almost bought one... by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      It might be the fact that it's a gas guzzling waste of space that isn't priced for use in the wilderness (read: who wants to get their hummer scratched?) nor meets the size demands of a heavily crowded interstate?

      It's like those guys with teh BMW SUV's. Give me a fucking break.

      It's a status symbol, and that is it.

    8. Re:I almost bought one... by edgezone · · Score: 1

      Sheesh. Get a grip people. Just because it isn't useful for you doesn't mean it's a total waste for everyone. The fact of the matter is, it DOES accomplish things that a bicycle can't accomplish (and yes, I own a decent Cannondale racing bike). I guess not a lot of people on here have spent a lot of time in Chicago. I don't own a car, but if this became reasonably priced (sub $2000), and upped the mileage per charge to over 15 miles, I might consider buying one.

      First off, it would be able to get me to work and back faster then the El train (according to the rated speed, it would be 30 minutes vs. 45-60). I would be able to use bikepaths or possibly the paths along the lake. Yes, I WOULD ride my bicycle to work, however, I don't think the clients would appreciate the fact that our building has no shower facilities. I'd end up stuck buying a health club membership just to use their showers. No go. I'd rather just ride my bike in the evenings.

      Next there's this concept of errands. Sorry, once again, a bicycle won't cut it. Yeah, I could (and do) walk the mile+ to the grocery store, or the 2 miles to the Pier 1/Office Depot complex, or the 3 miles to the Target, but when you have 6 bags of groceries, and it's a bit chilly out, I'd say a segway would come in pretty handy.

      And unlike a scooter, it would be something I could haul up a flight of stairs and keep in my apartment.

      All in all, 1500$ wouldn't be too bad to continue to not need a car (and make car payments and insurance payments), to get to work faster, and to ease running errands.

      If the price came down, and the mileage per charge up, I think Chicago IS a city that this could become a mainstream item. There are enough bike paths to separate pedestrians from Segway users, it would cut down on polution, and make life without a car even easier (since for me, groceries and laundry do not qualify as enough reasons to buy a car).

      Just because it doesn't offer a convenience for YOU doesn't mean it's only useful for the lazy. There are places in the world where it can be useful and where riding a bicycle is not practical.

      --
      -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    9. Re:I almost bought one... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with a status symbol?

      Without them how else do you display your status?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    10. Re:I almost bought one... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Anything that gets people out of their little pollution-generating cages is, IMO, a good thing.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    11. Re:I almost bought one... by Pii · · Score: 0
      No confession needed... I don't feel stupid for defending them. I don't think they need to be defended.

      If it makes you happy, do it, so long as you're not hurting someone else in the process. (And by "hurt," I mean, "Show me a victim." Not "hurt" in the "tragedy of the commons" sense.)

      I drive an SUV. I made it to work Monday and Tuesday this week, in spite of the 12" - 24" of snow that fell here in Northern VA/DC Metro area. I have a family to haul around in my private life, and equipment to haul around in my professional life.

      Even if that weren't the case, I'd probably still drive an SUV. I like them. I like the space. I like the increased visibility you get from sitting higher on the road.

      While I don't own a Hummer, I've driven plenty of those from when I was in the service. If money were no object, I'd love to own one (the H1s). The H2 is far less expensive than the previous generation, and I don't begrudge anyone that has one.

      I just don't understand the hostility people exhibit for SUV owners, or the vehicles they drive.

      It always comes across as envy. It's always "Why do you need THAT much car? Why do you need a vehicle that consumes THAT much fuel?" Who are they, that they feel they can be the final arbiter of who gets what, and in what proportion? The world would be a better place if people would mind their own business, and not worry about what their neighbors were doing.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    12. Re:I almost bought one... by irix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What's wrong with the Hummer H2, and what about it would make the buyer an idiot?

      Well, we are offtopic here, but since you asked...

      The H2 is a Chevy Tahoe in some fancy body cladding that they are charging twice the money for. It doesn't have half of the offroad capabilities of the real Hummer (HMMWV), which was selected by the U.S. military because it was the best wheeled offroad vehicle they could get.

      So, the people who are buying the H2 are doing it for the look-cool factor, but all they are getting is a minivan that uses three times as much gas. Sure, people might buy the original Hummer for the look-cool factor too, but at least they are getting the real deal.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    13. Re:I almost bought one... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Maybe when you graduate from high school you'll realize that displaying your status by having a flashy car isn't everything.

      (For the record, if drove the vehicle of my "income class", I'd be in a BMW; instead, I'm in an older Mazda, and rather enjoying a large bank account. Wouldn't own a car at all if my commute to work wasn't almost thirty miles.)

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    14. Re:I almost bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, I wear a suit made entirely of puppies and 100 dollar bills. Makes the ladies crazy!

    15. Re:I almost bought one... by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's wrong with the Hummer H2, and what about it would make the buyer an idiot?

      Aside from the fact that SUVs are proven to be unsafe to other drivers on the roads? The fact that most people who drive SUVs don't know how to drive well, especially a vehicle that big. The difference between the H2 and the Hummer is the H2 is a luxury car. It is not made to go off-roading. For that you buy an H1.

      H2s aren't that expensive, when it comes to status symbols either. You look much cooler going around in a CLK55, S600, SL600, BMW 7 series, etc. H2s make you look like a total dork. The only girls who will think your H2 is a cool car are those who don't understand Little-dick-syndrome, and that the H2 doesn't really make your dick bigger.

      I wouldn't say that the buyer is an idiot, I would say it is a dumbass choice in a vehicle. Unless you use an SUV for sport purposes, I think the person makes a dumbass choice if they buy one. If you are driving around town, get a fucking car and save the other drivers on the road and a few bucks in gas.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    16. Re:I almost bought one... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      If someone buys a Hummer and uses it off-road, or to tow boats, or to move horse trailers, or basicially uses it the way it was intended -- as a heavy-duty vehicle, then there is nothing wrong with owning a Hummer.

      The problem is the parade of soccer-moms and dickless wonders who seem to think that having this monster of a transportation device somehow makes them better human beings. The people that need to feel "safe" because they can crush a family of four in a Honda, rather than allowing both parties to survive a nasty accident.

      Finally, most of the people that drive vehicles like these attempt to drive them like they are sportscars, and naturally have problems maintaining control of the vehicle. If I had a nickel for every time some SUV or minivan driver has narrowly avoided taking me out when I was out running or cycling...never seem to have a problem with the buzzing Hondas, though.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    17. Re:I almost bought one... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      You really need to read The Millionaire Next Door.

      In general, status symbols mean you care more about the flash than the fact... and flash is awfully short lived.

    18. Re:I almost bought one... by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      oh, i don't know. maybe because the H2 is nothing special. it's build on a GM (i think surburban, or maybe tahoe) frame, and shares a number of parts from the stock GM parts bin. You're basically paying like $50,000 for an suv that you can get for around $30,000 if it didn't look like a hummer. The real hummers are cool, but the new H2 is just another way to get people to drop money on SUVs they don't need.

    19. Re:I almost bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For me, the feeling arose after being hit by a couple of the damn things.

      The majority of SUV drivers do not know how to handle their vehicle correctly. Last week my nice little car had its trunk smashed up by a SUV driver who then whined that I had slammed on my brakes and "caused" her to hit me (I had come to an easy stop behind a line of stopped traffic on an exit ramp; I have never been through that location during rush hour without stopping.) It's not my fault if her SUV, with her driving, can't stop in the amount of distance allowed by traffic conditions. And if she can't control her vehicle in the typical driving conditions for our city, she shouldn't be driving the thing.

    20. Re:I almost bought one... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I never said it was everything, but it is something. I haven't been in high school for quite some time now. So I ask you again, what is wrong with status?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    21. Re:I almost bought one... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with the Hummer H2, and what about it would make the buyer an idiot?

      You want to go off roading - but a used Jeep cjX and save about $40,000+

      You want lots of space and 4x4 - get a tahoe - cause its $20,000 less and almost the same vehicle

    22. Re:I almost bought one... by linuxelf · · Score: 1

      > Sheesh. Get a grip people. Just because it isn't useful for you doesn't mean it's a total waste for everyone.

      And it's a good thing, too. These things are only useful if very few people use them. I live/work in a medium sized city. You can't walk on a sidewalk here without bumping into someone. Take a city like New York, put everyone on Segways, and you're going nowhere fast.

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
    23. Re:I almost bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      And who are you to decide that your desires outweigh the needs of others ?
      Does might equal right ? The fact that you can do something gives you the right to do it?

      It's attitudes like that, when taken to the extreme, which have caused more hardships for others, and for the planet, than anything else.

      I don't suggest there is never a need for an SUV - sounds like you have a pretty good case for owning one. However, my problem with many SUV owners is far from one of envy. Why should I envy someone who has to spend that much money on a frivolous waste of space and energy ?
      I could buy one with cash, if I so desired. But Why ?

    24. Re:I almost bought one... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I actually have read that and its a great book. I am not some flashy pretentious tacky person. I just want to know why some people hate those folks who ARE like that. I don't have a problem with them myself.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    25. Re:I almost bought one... by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      I don't hate them either, but I do think they're stupid (and, reading back - nobody said hate... just that they were idiots). It's not ignorance either - they have a good enough education to know better. It's a simple lack of foresight and planning.

      Of course, when they get older they'll suddenly realize they don't have enough to retire on and start asking what the government is going to do for them.

    26. Re:I almost bought one... by crazyphilman · · Score: 4, Funny

      irix said, about the Hummer H2, "It doesn't have half of the offroad capabilities of the real Hummer (HMMWV), which was selected by the U.S. military because it was the best wheeled offroad vehicle they could get."

      Man, that's the truth. I was a US Marine, and went through Humvee school (Failed, for more or less killing a Humvee! That, friends, is Not Easy, it took complete submersion in a cold, six foot deep puddle out in the sticks, and driving up a hill at speed, and even that only cracked the engine block).

      The REAL Humvee is made almost entirely of kevlar; it has a Lamborghini suspension; it has a 6.2 liter naturally aspirated diesel engine; it has a snorkel and the exhaust is pushed up seven feet so you can cross shallow rivers; it has a TWELVE SPEED automatic transmission (High, High lock, low, low lock, and the traditional 1,2,3,D for each drive setting); REAL runout tires, with plastic spines, that can withstand small arms fire; and it's completely waterproofed right down to the glow plugs.

      The REAL Humvee can climb a 60 degree angle, WITH A TRAILER IN TOW. In High Lock. I know, because we did it. I used to watch Humvees climb firebreaks in Camp Pendleton. Straight up a freakin' mountain! They were amazing things. And, the hard-shell models are bulletproof.

      I'd gladly give my left nut for one (in good working order, that is). Provided anasthesia was supplied. ;)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    27. Re:I almost bought one... by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>used Jeep cjX

      Don't you worry about flipping one of those? My friend had a CJ7 (I think) and we nearly flipped on the way to go skiing when we hit a patch of ice. I never rode in it again. AFAIK though he still has it and uses it for daily transport (he's in a different state), so maybe I am out to lunch on this.

      When I needed an off-road vehicle, I couldn't afford one. Now that I can afford one, I don't need it. Irony is lovely.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    28. Re:I almost bought one... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      It's not that there's a problem with status per se, but that overzealous displays of status are...well, childish and asinine. A prime example of this is the need for some people to drive a massive SUV (like the Hummer H2) on suburban roads, when they could just as easily demonstrate their status (as well as superior taste, judgement, and respect for the safety of other motorists) by driving a Mercedes E55 AMG or a Porsche 911.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    29. Re:I almost bought one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>driving a Mercedes E55 AMG or a Porsche 911.

      Now you are talking! Phuck those land whales, gimme a car that can handle. M3, S8, even a Miata, it's all good.

    30. Re:I almost bought one... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Your making the assumption that everyone who is flashy is also unwise with their money to the point of insolvency. Someone might have 10 Porches for example, but be a millionaire in the double digits so its of no major consequence to their retirement.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    31. Re:I almost bought one... by cpeterso · · Score: 1

      it took complete submersion in a cold, six foot deep puddle out in the sticks, and driving up a hill at speed, and even that only cracked the engine block.

      How does a six foot deep puddle stay put on the side of a hill?

    32. Re:I almost bought one... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Ok, just because this is one of my coolest stories, here's what happened (I SWEAR this was NOT my fault):

      We were driving the hummer way out in the sticks, and it was winter so it was kind of cold. California cold, that is, which was maybe 40 or 50 degrees. But, still, chilly. So, the hummer is covered in mud, and I'm driving. The corporal says, Hey, get this thing wet; I don't want to clean off all this mud, dude. So, I was like, "Uh, OK."

      (NOTE: the hummer course says you should go only 15-20mph off-road, and never cross water doing over 5mph, but NO MARINE ALIVE ever drives that slow).

      Up ahead on the trail, there was a huge puddle about twenty or thirty feet wide. So, I got the hummer up to about thirty mph, and slammed into the puddle. Instant tidal wave! The hummer was soaked, and the mud came off. Great, right? So I thought that was kind of cool.

      I took the wrong fork in the road a few dozen yards further on, and we were pointing more or less towards the main road through base. The corporal was like, "Dammit, not left! Right!" I was like, "Fine! Let me get it turned around."

      Then I saw the puddle.

      It wasn't that big, maybe twenty feet across. It didn't LOOK deep, and with the shine off it, I figured it for only maybe a foot deep. I gunned the hummer, up to 20 or 30, and said, "Cool! Another puddle!" The corporal yelled, "WHAT THE FU..." (colossal splash) "YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!!" and just like that, we were underwater. Well, only for a second. I saw the wave come up over the windshield, and then we popped out over the other side, almost catching some air in the process. Well, the corporal had kittens. "OUT! YOU'RE FIRED! Hey, YOU! You're driving..." So, we all changed places, and we pointed the hummer up this huge hill that led back to the main base road.

      I was sulking in the back of the hummer when it suddenly stalled. "FUCK!" the corporal yelled. We let it coast back down to flat ground, and the corporal opened up the hood. He muttered, "I'll try and dry off the points, you assholes wait over there." I said to my friend, "Hey, aren't these diesels? Diesels don't have points." He said, "Let the corporal play. It's cool." So we waited while the corporal tinkered with the air cleaner, trying to find the "points", and after a minute, he jumped in and it turned over. "Get in, we're going back to base," he said.

      As I was walking up to the hummer, I noticed a stream of oil, I mean a thick, solid stream, coming out of the exhaust pipe. "Wow," I said. "What wow?" the corporal asked. "I mean," I said, "I knew these things burned oil, but that's just extreme." He looked out at the squirting oil, and his knees went a little weak.

      "Oh, sweet jesus... Jesus...," he muttered, "Aw, fuck..."

      We rode back to base as fast as we could, so the hummer didn't drop dead on us, and we got out to give it a final wash. The corporal grabbed me and said, "Look, I signed for this sumbitch, and I'll check it back in. You don't say SHIT, you understand? It was FINE when we turned it in. Got it???" I was like, "Fine, fine, whatever you say, man. But don't you think we should..."

      "NO!"

      "Fine! Whatever you say, corporal."

      So, ok, a couple of weeks later, he's down to lance corporal again, presumably for lying about the condition of the hummer (I TOLD him he should have filled out the form) and the gunny and first sergeant are giving me funny looks. The gunny asked me, while giving me the equivalent of a vulcan death grip, "Hey, I heard you had some fun in humvee school..." I was like, "Um... Yeah." He said, "Ok then," dismissed me, and the matter was dropped.

      And, like I said, I failed humvee school.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    33. Re:I almost bought one... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I drive an SUV. I made it to work Monday and Tuesday this week, in spite of the 12" - 24" of snow that fell here in Northern VA/DC Metro area.


      I wonder how we in Finland manage to drive just fine during winter (read: snowstorms, -30C, snow, snow and more snow) with our small FWD cars? If you need a SUV to cope with snow, I would say that the problem is not the car, the problem is between the steering-wheel and the seat.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    34. Re:I almost bought one... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to "display your status", if

      your status = moron?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    35. Re:I almost bought one... by clarkc3 · · Score: 1
      we nearly flipped on the way to go skiing when we hit a patch of ice

      most offroad designed tires are really bad for winter driving, so that I'd be willing to bet that was at least a contributing factor to that. A friend of mine who had one always hated how his looked with slimmer wheels and snow tires, but made admitted it made it much easier to drive on snow/ice. Still, most I see on the road never swap them out

    36. Re:I almost bought one... by renecarlos · · Score: 1

      >What's wrong with the Hummer H2, and what about it would make the buyer an idiot?
      Is it that you can't afford one?

      Idiot == one who buys an uglier Tahoe for a $15,000 premium. Look at the drivetrain specs, look at the interior. GM is smart to piggyback off the H1 phenomenon; buyers are idiots to fall for the switcheroo.

      In the motorcycle world, the H2 would be called a "parts-bin bike," and avoided like the plague by anyone who can.

    37. Re:I almost bought one... by Pii · · Score: 1
      Your small 4 wheel drive cars, with 6-8" of ground clearance wouldn't have gotten you anywhere on the eastern seaboard early this week. There was 12" to 36" of snow on all roads. All-wheel drive doesn't help once you've managed to beach yourself on the car's frame.

      Our problems were more related to the fact that snow clearing on the roads took a great deal of time because it was a long, sustained storm, and they generally don't begin digging out until the snow stops.

      In Wisconsin or Minnesota, each of which has similar weather to Finland, they do a much better job of keeping the streets clear. Of course, they are used to dealing with real winters. In the mid-Atlantic states (MD, VA, the Carolinas), we only have a respectable amount of snow-fall every 5 or 6 years. When they come, our Department of Transportation is not as well prepared as our northern neighbors.

      In case you think I missed your little jab, I didn't.

      Everyone knows that you idiots ski to work every day, jack-off.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  12. wake up! by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I wouldn't have predicted the mountain would be so big," Kamen says, "and that there would be so many hills to cross to get to the top."

    This guy makes more money than I do?

    I've only seen those things in use in bad sitcoms. They're ugly, awkward, expensive, and completely unneccessary for living today. I've seen fifth graders come up with better inventions.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:wake up! by EvilBuu · · Score: 1

      Actually, the best appearance I've seen of the Segway so far was on the Policy episode of Sealab 2021. However it was only there to show how much damage a moron with a high credit limit can do.

      --

      Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    2. Re:wake up! by 241comp · · Score: 1

      I've seen fifth graders come up with better inventions.

      Name one.

    3. Re:wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in San Diego, a large population base; I go to San Diego State University, with 35,000 students in attendance; and until recently worked at Home Depot, with thousands of customers a day. Point is, I've yet to see one of these things tooling down the road. Who buys them?

      I have a feeling there's a dusty ol' Seg in the back of not a few people's garages gone the way of that $3000 treadmill and the $10,000 pool in the backyard they use once a year. It's a curiosity, that's all.

    4. Re:wake up! by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Said statement was an exaggeration of the truth to enforce the point of the above post that the scooter is not well designed. I could have said 'I've seen monkeys...' and it would mean the same thing in this sense, so do not take it literally.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    5. Re:wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that monkeys have inventive capabilities equal to that of fifth graders?

      Dats stoopit!

    6. Re:wake up! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
      Depends on the monkey, depends on the fifth grader.

      One possible use for the segway is for a terrorist suicide bomber to enter a crowded office building with explosives strapped to himself. Its novelty will cause everyone to watch in fascination as he calmly approaches the appropriate spot to blow himself up.

      I'm having difficulty thinking of anything else. I can't imagine the elderly, with stiff joints, weak muscles, and poor reaction times being able to get on or off one of those without falling off right away.

    7. Re:wake up! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't have predicted the mountain would be so big," Kamen says, "and that there would be so many hills to cross to get to the top."

      This guy makes more money than I do?


      I think this article speaks directly to your point: No, right now, he's not making more money than you.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    8. Re:wake up! by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      not only that.. but Kamen is so dense that he doesn't even offer a battery-in-the-side-saddles options to actually make the Segway usefull for longer distances.

      what an idiot. I can't believe such a "smart" guy couldn't figure out something this basic to help out his own invention...

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    9. Re:wake up! by JavaJoint · · Score: 1
      I've seen fifth graders come up with better inventions.
      Name one.

      The girl that came up with a vertical bacon cooking rack. Comes out crispy and all of the grease drips off.

      Oh, and here's the story. She was only eight when she came up with it.

      Next! :-)

    10. Re:wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the latest Sluggy Freelance for some fun with a "smegway"

    11. Re:wake up! by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm. Grease.....

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    12. Re:wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like we should ban the suckers, then.

    13. Re:wake up! by 241comp · · Score: 1

      Thank you - I really was interested in inventions by young people.

  13. The FIRST mistake they made was by TerryAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that you have to STAND while riding a Segway!

    If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by worst_name_ever · · Score: 4, Funny
      If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

      And pedals, for when the battery runs down. Hey wait...

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    2. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Well said... If I can't use a product by draping my obese carcass over it, then I'm not going to use it at all.

      Are we really so lazy?

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    3. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure they make seats big enough for the fat arses for Americans.

    4. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      "If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different."

      Huh? Then it would be just like those little go-carts that are provided for use by the elderly and disabled in supermarkets. Why would we want to buy, and drive, one of those? The point of standing is to occupy less space, while not looking like a lazy or disabled person.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    5. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

      And then a roof for when it rains. Oh, and side windows. Maybe a windshield.
      Damn....now we have to put in some ventilation. Maybe A/C. How bout some heat for the winter?
      A stereo.
      Damn...now we need a bigger motor to pull all this crap. And the gyros can't handle all this extra weight. Better put on two more wheels for stability.
      Crap...it's raining. Need windshield wipers. And a defroster. More batteries to drive all this stuff.

      Gotta beef up the frame to handle those extra batteries. And again, more motor to drive it.

      Well...this is now too big and heavy to actually carry anywhere. Need a parking space for it. Might as well use the garage.
      Oh, and it now costs $8500 instead of $4950. Makes that new Kia look more and more inviting.

    6. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by jojor · · Score: 1

      If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

      sounds similar to a ... car!!! now there's a novel idea

    7. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by swordboy · · Score: 1

      If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

      Yes - and if they could also eliminate the need for recharging - perhaps if the user could somehow power it using his/her feet...

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    8. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Well if you want to sit down, you might as well buy a disabled cart. Do a Homer Simpson and become morbidly obese and you might even qualify to get one for free.

    9. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by haggar · · Score: 1

      If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

      They just invented that: it's called bike and it's widely popular, fast and practical.

      There's also something called bicicle, which doesn't use any fule, it's faster than the segway, and it's less dangerous to use. It's also narrower than the segway. I highly recommend it.

      --
      Sigged!
    10. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      You could at least make a reference to Andy Singer, who drew the original cartoon which you parodied in your post.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    11. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by garethwi · · Score: 1

      I think you're onto something here. Now if only there was some way we could reposition the wheels, so that they had a more lineal configuration.

    12. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      www.dictionary.com

      I highly recommend it. Especially for words like "bicycle" and "fuel".

    13. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by belroth · · Score: 1

      Try a Smart car.
      Doesn't fit my needs but it's cute and doesn't take up much room...

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    14. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by haggar · · Score: 1

      er... the "fule" was actually a typo. But regardless, why don't you rather go to Hemos, Malda and Co. to bitch about these issues? Incidently, they misspell much more often, and have no clue how to use the apostrophe - and they are editors of a major Internet news-site.

      --
      Sigged!
    15. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

      You know what - thats a damn good idea!

      Make a very light sittable one with peddles. The segway-type works only BALANCE the machine. You have to propel it workself!

      --
      It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    16. Re:The FIRST mistake they made was by TummyX · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't work.

      The segway balances itself by moving forward and backwards. The gyroscopes are only for sensing.

  14. why would someone buy one? by ianjk · · Score: 1

    I would feel like a tool scooting around on one of those. Not to mention it is expensive, heavy, slow, and ugly.

  15. How about the fact that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are stupid? Its like the fat chick - scooter saying. Maybe sell them over in Africa, Europe,or China and that entire population rolling around.

  16. Is this honestly a surprise? by Badgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Segway, no matter how advanced it is, is not something people were anxious to have. Maybe there are uses for it, but people don't see them, and they don't want them.

    Toss in the down economy, and it's no surprise.

    I don't think the plans for selling Segway were any more than "it's so cool and the guy behind it has a great reputation," and that is NOT enough.

    It's basic economics.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    1. Re:Is this honestly a surprise? by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      and of course it wasn't the plain fact that his invention sucked ass. He's going to blame the poor economy as the reason it failed...

      I have absolutely no desire to ride around on this thing. The videos I watched were a) scary, made me feel like I was watching a bunch of motorized lemmings, b) stupid as hell, everyone looked like a fucking dork riding on them.

      Let's appeal to human laziness! Yah, that doesn't work all the time.

    2. Re:Is this honestly a surprise? by Badgerman · · Score: 1

      Let's appeal to human laziness! Yah, that doesn't work all the time.

      It works a lot of the time - I should know, I'm a programmer.

      But you're right. In fact you're very right.

      The Segway would appeal to the lazy. However, the advantage it provides (transporation) is outweighed by the cost - where can you use it, how much does it cost, will you have many opportunities to use it, would it be better to get off your butt and exercise, etc.

      In short, on one level it appeals to laziness. But to take advantage of it you have to confront a large host of issues that just make it not worth it.

      I'm reminded of Victor Tugelbend in Terry Pratchett's "Moving Pictures" who put more effort into avoiding work than most people did AT work.

      --
      "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
    3. Re:Is this honestly a surprise? by Cuthalion · · Score: 1

      I don't think this does appeal to the lazy. Is riding a segway less work than driving a car? You don't get to sit down while doing it..

      --
      Trees can't go dancing
      So do them a big favor
      Pretend dancing stinks!
  17. Uh.. by Rob-sif · · Score: 0, Funny

    "Segway's price, low speed and tightened spending"

    Low speed?!?! AFAIAC, doing more than 10mph on one of those things would mean a large number of underpants changes along the way.

  18. Stirling engine? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Read the article. I see Wired is still bandying about vocabulary with abandon.

    So, anyone outside of Wired's offices know what a Stirling engine is?

    1. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh! What are you an idiot?

    2. Re:Stirling engine? by zero_offset · · Score: 4, Informative
      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    3. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.stirlingengine.com/faq/one?scope=public &faq_id=1

    4. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.

    5. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    6. Re:Stirling engine? by Quarters · · Score: 1
      "So, anyone outside of Wired's offices know what a Stirling engine is?
      Yeah, anyone who can type "Stirling engine" into Google. Here, I'll make it easy for you: How A Stirling Engine Works
    7. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen one at the Iowa energy fair last year. They had a whole bunch made out of coffee cans, tin cans, various trinkets. Sold for about $40-120 and was powered by a candle and moved various widgets when going. Kinda neat. Every scince/physics teacher should have one to astound and amaze students.
      Also a great way to explain why energy efficiant engines are not used for much besides moving widgets at a slow pace.

    8. Re:Stirling engine? by robolemon · · Score: 5, Informative
      A Stirling engine is an motor driven by two plates that are held (somehow) at a temperature difference. I have seen several, including one that was driven by the heat coming off my hand.

      The benefit to a Stirling engine is that any type of heating process can lead to motion.

      I actually learned this while visiting DEKA (Dean Kamen's research and development company that created the Segway). They were developed by a man named Stirling sometime in the 1800s, I believe.

      --

      I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    9. Re:Stirling engine? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Try Microprocessor Designs. These are the guys who actually designed and built the brains behind the Segway HT, on contract from DEKA. They are also working on the advanced controls necessary for DEKA's Stirling engine.

      In fact, these guys built Dean's dialysis unit, too. Pretty much DEKA's go-to guys for embedded work.

      I spoke with Jeff, the president of Microprocessor Designs, a couple months ago (we were discussing job prospects). He seemed enthusiastic about the Segway and Dean's ideas (well, they do get cash money from every Deanstorm), but I think the Stirling engine is going to have the best chance of widespread use.

      --
      ...
    10. Re:Stirling engine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, their definition is even up to date:
      "But today, Stirling engines are used only in some very specialized applications, like in submarines or auxiliary power generators for yachts, where quiet operation is important. Although there hasn't been a successful mass-market application for the Stirling engine, some very high-power inventors are working on it."

      Even today, there hasn't been a successful commercial application. Segway's inevitable commercial failure will save that webmaster some time, in that he won't have to update the definition on the site.

    11. Re:Stirling engine? by mr · · Score: 1

      Stirling engines have a 'almost, nope not quite' history. Modern material science helps to solve the problem of containing the working fluid, but for whatever reason, commerical engines you can go buy are not even CLOSE to reasonable, as each 'commerical' engine is hand-made. ($5000 for a kit engine, or $16,000 for the engine in the whipsergen product.)

      Why would a stirling engine matter? The concept of just heating one side and cooling the other to do work. Thus a solar concentrator, the methane burned at the landfill, and the act of heating your home can get you electrical power. Using the solar concentrator, you can even get air conditioning via ammonia.

      Want a demo engine that moves? At least 15 kits exist for this kind of engine. One will even run off the heat your computer monitor makes.

      Onto the 'small but can do meaningful work' engines:
      You've got DEKA (Kamen, the segway ppl). Not shipping, no real public statements as to where they are.
      Wayne Conrad http://www.omachron.com/contact.html claimed to have a 1 hp Stirling design at a $89 price point due to the ease of manufactoring.
      The ST-5 was a shipping an engine, and stopped.

      Bigger engines:
      One company sells a 100Kw stirling, the Swedes use them in subs.
      The car companies have had experimental cars with these engines.

      http://www.stirlinginfo.com/ and http://www.sesusa.org/ have links-o-plenty and you can go find out what happening (or not) in stirlings.

      --
      If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
    12. Re:Stirling engine? by trotski · · Score: 1

      The trouble with the Stirling Engine it's that while theoretically it should have Carnot (maximum) efficiency, in practice it generally doesn't. The problem is that for a Stirling engine to be effective you need isothermal heating and isothermal cooling during the process, as well as perfect regeneration (the heat lost during the cooling stage transfered to the heating stage); such things are very difficlut to do due to heat losses, and friction.

      Concequently, a real Stirling engine does not have efficiencies that are significantly better than other closed cycle engines such as the Otto (you're regular gas burning car engine) and the Diesel; a 'cheep' stirling like they have in my school actually has a tremendously low efficiency (~10 %) as compared to Carnot (~30-40%).

      Technology ofcourse is changing and things are getting better, but as of today; using the Stirling engine to increase efficiency is rather pointless.

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    13. Re:Stirling engine? by Guitarsenal · · Score: 0

      A stirling engine takes advantage of the fact that gasses expand when heated and contract when cooled. A Stirling engine simply moves gas (commonly air) from the hot side of the engine to the cool side, and moves a piston when the gas presure in the engine changes.

      These engines are tyically very effecient, quiet and simple - but they do not start instantly. It takes time to generate the temp. difference between the hot and cold side of the engine.

      KP

    14. Re:Stirling engine? by cayle+clark · · Score: 1

      A fun read still in print is Mark Shelton's The Next Great Thing -- a 1989 account, in a tone reminiscent of "The Soul of a New Machine," telling of the attempt by an Ohio company to develop a Stirling engine for use in solar power conversion.

      The company still exists and sells a 1KW engine -- but as a $46K "prototype," not a production model.

  19. Ha ha by nelsonal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its funny, if he hadn't had such high expectations, he could have a small but profitable and growing company, it sounded like he had orders for 10 per week or 520 per year, if he had not leased a 70,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility, and planned to revolutionize the world selling thousands a week, which increased his fixed costs, and the numbers he needed to sell to be profitable, this would be a completely different story. Google did it right, grow at a sustainable rate, and do not try to get too big too fast.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    1. Re:Ha ha by sulli · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And the guy could have spent less money on lobbying every state in the union to change its traffic laws to accommodate the thing and instead focused on making it just a wee bit cheaper? Just a thought. Powell and Peralta sure didn't worry about legalizing skateboards on the streets of LA - they just sold 'em.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    2. Re:Ha ha by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google did it right, grow at a sustainable rate, and do not try to get too big too fast.

      While I generally agree with you, bringing up Google as a comparison is a massive stretch. You can't compare a search engine company to one that manufactures relatively expensive products. The needs, requirements, and pitfalls are vastly different. The infrastructure requirements are vastly different, the ability to adapt to market conditions are vastly different, you just can't say "he shoulda did what google did ...".

      Again, I'm not disagreeing with the fact that he got too carried away, but please use a company that has remotely similar requirements/structure to compare against, esp. not Google.

    3. Re:Ha ha by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      The only thing better than seeing a company with a product you hate, fail, is seeing a company with a product you love, succeed (punctuation?). As much as I'd like to see the guys from RealPlayer (or arguable Segway) in bankruptcy, I'd rather see the Google team get rich. In a Darwinian sense, both failure of the bad and success of the good are important, success is more enjoyable.

    4. Re:Ha ha by FallLine · · Score: 1
      Its funny, if he hadn't had such high expectations, he could have a small but profitable and growing company, it sounded like he had orders for 10 per week or 520 per year, if he had not leased a 70,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility, and planned to revolutionize the world selling thousands a week, which increased his fixed costs, and the numbers he needed to sell to be profitable, this would be a completely different story. Google did it right, grow at a sustainable rate, and do not try to get too big too fast.
      I agree that his sales expectations were way too high (and hence the very product is just financially unworkable), but many businesses cannot be grown that organically. Google is an unusual case, for such a visible business, as their costs are pretty low, i.e., low fixed costs and low variable costs, no need for massive cash layouts just to get started, and they could trivially step it up without huge jumps in expenses (with a little bit of ingenuity). His bet, from my minimal reading of what he's done, was that he'd reduce the production costs by mass producing them and thus expand his potential market dramatically and improve his company's margins. This, unfortunately, cannot be done in small quantities. Furthermore, I believe he was expecting to change city regulations through various forms of lobbying--which is expensive--that prevent its legal use in most, if not all, possible (safe) niches. This too makes it very hard to grow gradually. The biggest problem is that it simply does not make financial sense to invest in a business that promises huge cash layouts to even develop the product, take 5 years to get to market, expect to grow by, say 10% a year, and even then only offer slim margins--especially when you factor in the risk and what not involved. In other words, if he said that he'd only grow at 10% a year, or what have you, given the cost structure, not only would actual (wise) investors today be very reluctant to invest, but it'd simply be very bad way to allocate resources. Some businesses are simply hit or miss. You either hit it big with large upfront investment or you don't do it at all.

      Maybe, now that the product is developed, he can eak out a niche, but I highly doubt that the investors will ever see a return on their investment. The technology is simply flawed. It's too expensive to develop and manufacture for such marginal gains and its real utility is questionable in the first place. It's a neat idea, but it should have never left the lab, there's better, more practical, ways that those resources could have been spent.
    5. Re:Ha ha by FallLine · · Score: 1

      Do you mean this seriously? I don't think this would work very well. The difference is that skateboards are cheap to develop, cheap to manufature, and (relatively) cheap for the consumers to buy--this means that there's little to risk in its getting confiscated and it makes it easy for kids to buy (or at least for their parents)...who is the primary market. These are two very different user groups, given the dramatic cost and performance characteristics (i can hardly see kids trying to do stunts on them or trying to outrun the authorities...) of these devices. Skateboards are really not designed to be transportation devices; they can be used as they're designed--for fun, in many areas (e.g., skateparks, driveways, private roads, some parks, etc), without running affoul of the law. IT's intended use, transportation, on the other hand, demands its legality in most, if not all, areas that consumers may travel to.

    6. Re:Ha ha by dead+sun · · Score: 1
      It's a stretch, but I can see it in a certain light. Google has a lot of computing power. We've all seen the articles about their massive clusters. The have massive amounts of storage space, and lots of help keeping things working and improving. But they didn't just go out and say, "Lets get a whole ton of computers and make a search engine to revolutionize the internet, hyping it up while we code it, and then hoping people buy into it once we've invested so much." No, they grew at a steady rate, built up their computing centers, and seem to be generally stable.

      Now contrast with the Segway. None have been delivered into consumers' hands that I know of, there have only been tests, demos and the like. They've got huge capacities for manufacture, but they sure as heck aren't being used. They've relied on hype to try to sell these things and hoped that they'd just be rolling in orders. And hype is exactly what it seems that they're left with.

      --
      If not now, when?
    7. Re:Ha ha by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      It's a stretch

      It's apples and oranges, yes their both fruits but they just can't compare. google does have a lot of computing power, but then can more easily scale their infrastructure to meet their needs (both up and down). Add cpu's and fatter/more pipes, takes some time, but not that much. Compare this to manufacturing. The cost for UNDERESTIMATING manufacturing requirements is death for your company. How long does it take to get a new factory up and going? Employing workers, training them, setting up logistics to get raw materials in and finished product out, etc, etc. This is totally different than slapping some more servers in the server room (there have already been discusions here about how easily googles application scales).

      Again, I agree that they were too pie in the sky, but the two business models are completely different and a much better comparison is needed.

    8. Re:Ha ha by DaTreeBear · · Score: 1

      This brings up another point. I think they may be facing a bit of a backlash against all the hype the product received before it was released. The media was flooded with reports and speculation about "Ginger" and the "Thing" weeks before anyone even knew what it was. They were saying it was going to revolutionize transportation. When it was finally revealed, I for one felt a bit cheated to find it ammounted to little more than an expensive scooter for adults. Cool? Yes. Revolutionary? I don't think so.

    9. Re:Ha ha by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      My point was that it is rare for a business to fail because of underspending. Many .coms could have been profitable, shipping 50 lb bags of dog food excluded, if they had not tried to get every eye on the internet in their first six months as a company. In most cases, it was their rush to get big so quickly that killed them.
      Cash flow kills many a profitable company, profitable small businesses fail regularly becuase they don't realize how a cash cycle works, and why too much growth can be bad.
      In this case, you have a company that knowing that it wasn't planning to offer much more than test models for the first year, remember when Amazon was one of the few companies allowed to test any, built capacity for thousands of sales in a week.
      I picked Google, because unlike the other search engines, it didn't try to grow its userbase with expensive advertising, it just grew slowly through word of mouth, and is currently profitable, unlike just about every other search engine. Excite and AltaVista benefited from the same scalability as Google, but neither is anywhere near its former glory.
      And with things like contract manufacturing getting new production on line takes less time than it used to, it is not instant, but as an example I think Microsoft went from first idea to production of the X-Box in less than one year.
      Besides, keeping his products exclusive probably would do wonders for his brand name and pricing ability, and is a much better error state than sitting on 90% underutilized capacity.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Ha ha by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      You point about Google v Excite/AltaVista is fine, but Google had a huge advantage here in that they got into the game well after either one of those two did. They were coming into a market that already had many players and more importantly, already had losers. Segway was trying to create a new market, and as such didn't have the benefit of having others to model after. Microsoft was able to get xbox off the ground quickly because it is basically a pc. The only real custom part required was the stuff from nVidia, everything else was basically off the shelf.

      Again, I'm not disagreeing with your comment about Kamen being dumb about way over-estimating demand, I just didn't think that google was a good comparison. I'm sure there are successful manufacturers out there that did the slow and cautious thing and benefited from doing so that can be brought out as good counterpoints.

    11. Re:Ha ha by tanner_andrews · · Score: 1
      The cost for UNDERESTIMATING manufacturing requirements is death for your company.
      No, the cost for underestimating the manufacturing requirements is in fact having less product to sell, and therefore having to sell it at a higher price. That's a problem most widget makers would love to have.
      --
      Tilt at windmills. Occasionally one will fall over out of sheer surprise.
  20. Very Handy in the Snow! by gurnb · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that a Segway is very usefull on the East Coast right now. With all of that snow, the sidewalks are virtually empty.

    These things will end up as a rental device at places like the Boardway in Atlantic city, of in Panama City Beach in the summertime.

    I'm already looking on Ebay to get one cheap.

    --
    "This must be a Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays."
  21. uhh ... by wobblie · · Score: 1

    How about the stupid name, and the gaffe of using the acronym "SHT"?

  22. Good idea, bad timing by CainX · · Score: 1

    For a smart guy Kamen really dropped the ball on this one. He should have waited for his miniature Stirling engine to be ready for production, and for the computer hardware required to balance the thing to be much, much cheaper. Exactly what target market was he aiming for with an 80lb. $5000 scooter?

    1. Re:Good idea, bad timing by tftp · · Score: 1

      Probably the most expensive parts are: batteries, motors, custom metal components, and labor (including his extreme factory size!). Microcontrollers are cheap these days, and the industry is well adapted to low volume manufacturing.

    2. Re:Good idea, bad timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may be a great inventor, but a great businessman would've been able to anwser that question prior to even the first one being made. It is all about supply and demand. He has to produce enough, and the demand has to be there. If demand isn't there you're in trouble.

    3. Re:Good idea, bad timing by CainX · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that, but I've read each segway has the equivalent of 4 average PC's worth of processing hardware to handle all the gyroscope data and balancing software. A segway released in 2008 that was $500, weighed 15 lbs, and ran on an ultra efficient stirling instead of an electric motor would be a viable product. The one right now is totally unmarketable.

  23. Its neither here nor there by shamitbagchi · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seems the Segway is not yet appropriate for this age, neither for long distances nor like a bike - its more of a 'F L A S H Y' item - no real utility I guess - nor the necessary speed . . . Though at first sight ppl may get bowled over - the auto-balancing mechanism using gyroscopes though is indeed a unique mechanism for personal transport as they call - UPON THAT ITS ONLY FOR INDIVIDUALS ALL THIS ADDS FUEL TO FIRE AND YOU HAVE SEGWAY IN TROUBLE READ MORE Read More

  24. Product in search of a market by jj_johny · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Honestly, I have no idea how these folks thought that we need these things. Its great technology and a rather good job of engineering but most people need to walk more not less. And where can you use them? Not too many places. Like Steve Jobs said in the future cities will be designed around these. Well they aren't now and so its really a techno brag instead of being useful.

    As for other markets, when I worked in a industrial plant in the Netherlands, the foreman and others who had to go a long distance had bikes with banana seats. Very low tech but usable.

    And I don't think that too many folks in the NE of the US are going to be able to use theirs for several weeks.

    1. Re:Product in search of a market by will_die · · Score: 5, Funny

      Like Steve Jobs said in the future cities will be designed around these. Already happening, San Francisco is redesigning thier city by putting up theses 'No Segways allowed.' signs.

    2. Re:Product in search of a market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for other markets, when I worked in a industrial plant in the Netherlands, the foreman and others who had to go a long distance had bikes with banana seats. Very low tech but usable.

      Funny, when I worked at Delta, I saw several old bikes with banana seats at the jet base (the big hangar complex you see when sitting on the runway in Atlanta).

      I'd ride a bike to work if there were bike paths. I'm not about to go out on the street and there are no sidewalks.

    3. Re:Product in search of a market by aengblom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its great technology and a rather good job of engineering but most people need to walk more not less.

      In other words: People just aren't willing to even consider giving up The Car. I'm not pointing to you specifically, but people keep pointing out -- WHY NOT WALK. Well, would obviously extend the range / ease of getting to nearby shops etc.

      I think this may have been Mr. Karmen's primary blind spot. He was looking at replacing the car. People see this as "better walking".

      I don't need $3,000 shoes even if they do make my walking twice as easy.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    4. Re:Product in search of a market by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Netherlands, the foreman and others who had to go a long distance had bikes with banana seats.

      perhaps they should stop having lunch at the "coffee shops".
      Banana seats?!?
      Tell them I have a bunch of platform shoes with fishes in them for sale

    5. Re:Product in search of a market by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      Cities will be built around these?

      I remember when everyone were talking about IT. Even my mother who doesn't know a thing about technology asked me about it. I simply replied that it's probably another over-hyped piece of technology that won't see much use and much closer to junk, so don't hold her breath over it (no pun intended)

      Boy I didn't know how close I was to the mark.

      The average American is already fatter than two third-world country man combined. And we'll be using this instead of walking? I can imagine a city in the future HAS to be built around these because the population is so incredibly lazy and obese.

      And he wants $5000 for this? No thanks, I'll walk.

  25. Geez Louise by secolactico · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who didn't expect this idea to tank?? An overpriced scooter with far too embarrasing publicity stunts and too much pre-production hype for it's own good.

    --
    No sig
  26. Duhh by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Nobody without loads of cash to blow is ever going to buy one of these unless the price was in the sub $500 range. You can buy a powered scooter for that price ($500 or cheaper) that will take you to your destination just as fast if not faster and you can actually carry it as it doesn't weigh more than 20-30 pounds if that. A $50 bike will just as much and are generally accepted in most places and most people learn how to ride a bike during childhood so its not such a hard thing to do. I'm sorry, but the Segway will never work like they hoped as its just not what people need.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  27. Hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will change the world by making everyone look like idiots! Even drunk homeless guys move faster than you! And it costs as much as a good PC!

    No thanks! I'm already an idiot! I dont need that device!

  28. Forget that by Synithium · · Score: 1

    I'm getting a 65" Digital Widescreen. Beat that one Dean!

  29. The Brits could have predicted this... by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back in the early/mid eighties in the UK there was a scientist/inventor/businessman called Clive Sinclair. He had a string of successes in consumer electronics, starting with a digital watch and progressing to home computers. One of his final products was a revolutionary electric one person "car", incorporating lots of new and clever technology. It was predicted that it would be huge success, as where most of his other products. But it was a dismal failure. Nobody wanted one. It looks like history is repeating...

    1. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by shippo · · Score: 1

      Sinclair did manage to sell around 16,000 C5s worldwide. I doubt that the Segway will ever acheive anything like this.

    2. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Really? The sales figures given here don't look so good. But even if you are right, compared to their original predictions, 16k is a tiny number.

    3. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by mccalli · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have a very small amount of sympathy for Sinclair over this. The C5 was never the intended end product.

      I remember seeing a documentary about it - basically, the end product was to be a full-sized electric car which could carry four people. However, the company ran out of cash and needed something to sell quickly. Hence the rather quickly thrown-together C5.

      Can still remember its debut on TV. Looked great in the studio, then they showed some live shots of trying to use it in London traffic. I'll never forget the sheer terror on the face of the guy who drove ir down the inside of a large truck...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    4. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sinclair rocked. I still have 4 of his computers.
      NO crappy bike, though.

    5. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      This costs several times the price though.

      Og course, the Segway is probably better engineered, since Clive Sinclair was better at the basic concepts than ensuring good build quality. The main problem with both is that people feel a bit self concious driving them.

      Really the best way to make money from something like this is to come up with as many clever ideas as possible to make it work, patent them, and hope to recoup the loss of a failed vehicle through licencing the components.

    6. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Clive Sinclair is still around. Right now he's selling tiny radios for about $15. See his website at: http://www.sinclair-research.co.uk . I see he's also selling Weelchair assist. That's a new addition, as the last time I checked the site (in January sometime) it wasn't there.

    7. Re:The Brits could have predicted this... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      He had a string of successes in consumer electronics, starting with a digital watch and progressing to home computers.


      I'm sorry, but the Sinclair Digital Watch was a dismal failure.

      http://www.nvg.ntnu.no/sinclair/other/blackwatch .h tm
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  30. Segway must die by MSBob · · Score: 1
    It is a stupid idea. Always was. Tewnty years ago a British man named Clive Sinclair had an idea for revolutionizing transportation. He invented a small electric bike that had a range similar to that of Segway and was powered by an electric battery. It was a spectacular failure that ultimately ended his once successful Sinclair Research corporation.

    Segway is going to die the same way C5 did despite it's enormous marketing budget. People have voted with their wallets against silly "inventions" like this in the past and they will do it again. If I were Kaman I'd try to start cutting losses now before he has to move out of his beautiful mansion.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  31. Can't take it with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget it's too expensive and too light to leave lying around. So where am I going to store the chain (and the groceries) while I'm TOOLing it around to the corner store and back?

    Not to mention we don't have sidewalks in SubZeroBurbia.

  32. buy a segway on amazon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and kill two... help two struggling technology startups with one purchase :D

  33. Hype + Stupid Idea = ? by Root+Down · · Score: 1

    the article cites Segway's price, low speed and tightened spending in the corporate world

    ...equals early sales and then - nada. So I can spend thousands of dollars to go as fast as I normally do only to put up with the annoyance of having to store the thing when I arrive at my destination? Super. Let me get my checkbook.

    What they really need is a performance boost... Take the auto industry. We spend billions each year buying cars that go a bazillion miles an hourt (despite the 65 MPH speed limit) and rugged SUVs that can climb mountains just so we can can feel safe picking up the groceries. I say put a high performance chip in there, some racing stripes, steel spikes to ward off pesky lo-tech pedestrians and some oversized rims - then you're looking at something to feature in the next Vin Deisel film. ;)

    1. Re:Hype + Stupid Idea = ? by Khaed · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but in with your post...

      That's one stupid thing about the auto industry. My dad once had a motorcycle for getting to work. It got about the same gas mileage as the truck he replaced it with.

      Because they had to "beef up" the engine before they sold it. Because some idiots want to go faster. Maybe it's just me, but the idea of going really fast on a motorcycle seems kind of stupid.

      And SUVs probably can't climb mountains. The damn things can barely turn without rolling over. (The original hummer((not the H2)) being an exception; it was developed more for military use than personal use. I have no idea about the H2)

      Personally, I'd rather pay less for gas than be able to have an engine that can go faster; I'm not going to go that fast.

  34. Can't replace walking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So someone builds a machine to replace walking, and they are having trouble selling it?

    Go figure.

    1. Re:Can't replace walking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, these are actually selling quite well. Cars and trucks are hardly new, and the don't seem to have such a hard time selling them. Get this they have actually replaced walking! Instead of walking every where I go, I can now hop in one of these babies a get there less exhausted and in a fraction of the time.

      Really, all of you people complaining about the Segway replacing walking, the same can be said about cars, bikes, roll skates, and horse and buggies... Boat are to do nothing more than replace swimming. You are lazy if you own ANY of these...

  35. Corporate Spending Will Improve, Segway Will Live! by mosch · · Score: 1

    As the economy recovers, corporate spending is again on the rise, and with it will come the rise of the Segway. Truly, the Segway will change the way we walk to the cafeteria and the bathroom!

  36. Poor Segway. by grub · · Score: 1


    No one is buying their personal transporter and they're losing loads of money. Which gives me a nice segue to mention fuckedcompany.com

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  37. It'll sell by nesneros · · Score: 1

    When we "re-design cities around it" (Steve Jobs, if I'm not mistaken). Once we re-design all our cities, I'm sure they'll be selling like hotcakes.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
    1. Re:It'll sell by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

      1) Build very expensive motor-scooter with auto-balance
      2) Redesign all cities around it
      3) Profit!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    2. Re:It'll sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But will it SMELL like hotcakes?

    3. Re:It'll sell by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Unfortunatly it seems to be:

      1) Build very expensive motor-scooter with auto-balance
      2) Get banned from places
      3) Bankruptcy!

  38. Wait a minute... by jav1231 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought they were not selling these to the general public yet. Rather, only to business and municipalities and such. If not, then perhaps they should try something that all the cool businesses are doing nowadays: ADVERTISE! MARKETING! BTW: I said when I first saw this thing that it was not going to be a big hit. It's a scooter! Yes, it is probably the most revolutionary scooter. Yes, it is cool technology. Yes, it would be neat to own won. But it's still a $3K+ scooter! The general public will not get past that. Replace the car? Hardly! Joe Dirt has no where to carry his case of Bud. >

    1. Re:Wait a minute... by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      The video that was linked from an earlier post in this thread showed a guy in Seattle with one. He had a pretty large looking saddle bag that he kept a GPS and a video camera in.
      I wonder how soon he gets his scooter "Segway-jacked"?
      Though I suppose it wouldn't be tough to track down a fleeing criminal on a Segway...

    2. Re:Wait a minute... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i also carry 2-3 laptops. i've gone over 300 miles on my segway ht for the last 75+ days, i've never been "segway jacked" but hey, if anyone is in my area, feel free to attempt to, just be prepared for the physical and legal actions of the local authorities.

      to get "jacked" the "jacker" would need to get me off the ht, turn it back on with a 64 bit encoded key, learn how to use it, and then take off. if you step off the ht and it goes 1-2 feet without the rider, it turns off. only segway can make new encoded keys.

      i'm really not worried about a jacking.

  39. slow sales my ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Perhaps Segway should have found a use (i.e. market) for their product before forecasting sales...sounds to me like sales are right on pace for a ridiculously expensive novelty product.

    I'm sure it will eventually lead to some great advance but the current incarnation is trash, hence the current company is probably destined for the trash heap as well.

  40. But.... by Randolpho · · Score: 1

    ...but.... Smegways explode when they tip over.

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  41. Market Backlash by rob_from_ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anothe strike against the company, backlash from all the hype. We were promised an earth shattering, mind blowing, world changing "it" of an invention. "Something people would design cities around." Instead we get an expensive scooter that you can't take with you on public transit, use on many city streets, drive on the street, or fit in your car to take with you. After a year of magical mystery hype about this wonderful invention and "leaks" about the nature of it, even if it cost $50, I'd probably not buy one out of spite.

    1. Re:Market Backlash by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It was just a stupid invention.

      As you point out, you cant use it on most city streets, and you cant use it on the sidewalks either.

      The only potential market I could see was as a rental at places like Disneyworld, and even then there's a huge liability issue with people getting their toes run over and whatnot.

      Maybe they should have designed the cities FIRST, then designed the scooter around them, instead of the other way around.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Market Backlash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a year of magical mystery hype about this wonderful invention and "leaks" about the nature of it, even if it cost $50, I'd probably not buy one out of spite
      But you are still using Windows. I think you need to get your priorities straightened out.

    3. Re:Market Backlash by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not Kamen's fault. You're blaiming his failure on massive speculation he had no control over.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    4. Re:Market Backlash by rob_from_ca · · Score: 1

      Point taken; most of the really over the top hype seems to come from Steve Kemper. Still though, I don't recall a press release from Kamen saying "Everyone, calm down, it's just a scooter."

      I did find this though on the theITquestion
      website, which I think shows that someone had some perspective on what they saw, even back then:

      ...Brill's Content has learned that neither Jobs nor Bezos are investors in the company and both men are deeply critical of "IT's" design and release plans. Jobs said the design "sucks" and that "its shape is not innovative, it's not elegant, it doesn't feel anthropomorphic." Bezos said, "I think this plan is dead on arrival. The U.S.A. is too hostile.".

      Funny stuff.

    5. Re:Market Backlash by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

      even if it cost $50, I'd probably not buy one out of spite.

      If you really want to spite them, buy one for full price and then sell it to me for $50--that'll show those fat cat engineers.

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    6. Re:Market Backlash by sulli · · Score: 1

      It is his fault. He spent all his time hyping the thing on talk shows and lobbying for traffic laws to favor it, instead of actually selling it, or making it less expensive. According to the Wired article he didn't even hire a director of sales for quite a while! Appalling.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    7. Re:Market Backlash by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      "Something people would design cities around."

      problem is, most cities are already designed....

      even if it cost $50, I'd probably not buy one out of spite.


      Dude, bookmark my profile name, 'cause if it costs $50 anytime soon, I will buy you one...
      (just out of spite)
      :P

  42. Segway's foolish strategy by release7 · · Score: 1
    Even IF the Segway is the greatest revolution in transportation since the automobile, it wasn't very smart to sink millions and millions of dollars into a huge hype campaign, lobbying efforts, and a factory devoted to cranking out 10,000 units a day before there was a demand. The automobilie industry didn't start out that way but rather grew more organically. When people saw the first saw a car roll down the street I'm sure they thought, "Wow! I've GOT to have one!" The rest took care of itself.

    Then again, maybe the Segway they HAD to put on a dog and pony show because when people see it they probably think, "Wow! That guy riding the Segway looks like a dork!"

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

    1. Re:Segway's foolish strategy by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1
      when people see it they probably think, "Wow! That guy riding the Segway looks like a dork!"

      Or worse...
      http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20011227& mode=classic
  43. Take my Segway...please! by Toasty16 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dean Kamen is a genius! I mean, a motorized scooter? It's brilliant! Society will be revolutionized!

    Think of the benefits: Less people driving cars! Unless more than one person wants to travel, and unless they want to carry luggage or groceries or anything else for that matter, or if they want to listen to the radio while they travel, or if they want to go more than a dozen or so miles...hmm, lets try this again.

    Think of the benefits: Easier personal transport! Unless you run into a flight of stairs, or uneven or wet ground, or want to travel for longer than 45 minutes after which you'll have to lug it around with you like so much dead weight...hmmm, this isn't working either.

    How about this: The Segway is amazing! For only $5000 you can get a motorized scooter that allows you to roll where you once walked! That is truly revolutionary, unless you count the bicycle, rollerskates, rollerblades, skateboards, wheelchairs, non-motorized scooters...Aww forget it, I give up!

    1. Re:Take my Segway...please! by haggar · · Score: 1

      Heh, nice one :o) you got some literacy talent, buddy! I'm going to look up your other posts...

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:Take my Segway...please! by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

      Or if you wanted to stay warm during winter, stay cool during summer, stay dry during rain, get to work in a snowstorm, go off road, have sex in the back seat, party with your friends, get a little excitement out of driving, or keep all your body parts during the transition to the segway (ever see what happens to a person when hit by a dump truck). The Segway is just a failure.. what's the damn point? A horse is a better method of transportation, it's only by byproduct is the usual #1 and #2.

    3. Re:Take my Segway...please! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      For only $5000 you can get a motorized scooter that allows you to roll where you once walked! That is truly revolutionary, unless you count the bicycle, rollerskates, rollerblades, skateboards, wheelchairs, non-motorized scooters...Aww forget it, I give up!

      Except for wheelchairs, none of those vehicles have any right being around where people walk.

    4. Re:Take my Segway...please! by Forgotten · · Score: 1

      Not so. All it takes is a little planning to create great multimode pathways. I've used these in cities like Ottawa and Vancouver to walk, skate and ride, and it's fantastic how seamlessly it can all work together. It also creates a nice social fabric, as people learn to look at each other as something other than an accident waiting to happen.

      I can see how you'd reach your conclusion looking at regular old city sidewalks, but keep in mind that those aren't really even designed for walking. They're designed for walking to and from your car. Really, they're just the leftover space after cutting a city up so people can drive cars absolutely everywhere. If you want one culprit transportation mode that's incompatible with absolutely everything else, look no further. Even motorcycles can't safely coexist with cars.

      Squared-off road-shoulder sidewalks with a crosswalk over a busy road every block can barely support walkin any distance, and even a walking/jogging mix doesn't work. Ask yourself, why do we so often consider something as natural and even desirable as jogging or running to be unsafe - "no running in the halls!"? It's a question of designing spaces and throughways. It can be done - we just need to start playing down the single biggest spoiling element to every other mode of transport. Cities don't have to be laid out in square blocks, and wide, winding two-way paths can support lots more than walking without any danger to anyone.

    5. Re:Take my Segway...please! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      Not so. All it takes is a little planning to create great multimode pathways.

      Right now, they aren't permitted where people walk in most places. And that makes sense: people don't want 20mph vehicles weaving through 4mph pedestrians.

      I've used thesI've used these in cities like Ottawa and Vancouver to walk, skate and ride,

      Well, I don't know about Ottawa or Vancouver, but car-free zones in Europe generally still keep bicycles and pedestrians apart. Such zones are created by having pedestrians take over most of the street, with narrow paths for bicycles. Skates, if they are regulated, are generally not permitted at all.

    6. Re:Take my Segway...please! by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      I used to ride my bicycle where people walk all the time. I was able to ride at the speed of those people walking as well. and when the foot traffic opened up, I could speed up and go around the groups of people. I have also seen people proficient on rollerskates/rollerblades (same damn thing really) able to do the same thing. Don't think that just because some idiot on wheels ran into you, everyone on wheels is the same way. If I thought that I wouldn't trust my life anywhere near a road, with all the cars killing people and stuff.

    7. Re:Take my Segway...please! by g4dget · · Score: 1
      I used to ride my bicycle where people walk all the time.

      Well, first, you probably violated traffic laws with that. Second, even if you didn't run into anybody, it is damned annoying for pedestrians.

    8. Re:Take my Segway...please! by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      You're assuming too much. The boardwalk and pier were both allowable for bicycle traffic, and I was not the only one riding bikes on them. There were not a large number of bikes, and usually I was the only one riding, but they were present. As I said, I rode at the speed of traffic. The boardwalk was wide enough for 5 or 6 people to walk abreast, so when traffic was heavy both ways, couples could pass each other easily. The pedestrian traffic flowed just like cars on the road, everyone staying to their right. I just was on a bike. No more annoying than the families pushing baby strollers, some of which were wider than me and my bike.

      And I only got one complaint: It was a light traffic day, everyone was walking away from the peir, up the boardwalk towards the shops/diners. Since there was noone coming the other way, everyone was on the left side, along the railing, looking over the water. The right side was completely clear for a few hundred feet. I was riding at a reasonable/safe speed, passing the people walking, not annoying anyone. Of course I kept my eye on the people in front of me, and my hands on the brakes. I saw a kid, about 4 years old, walking next to his parents, but he kept going across the boardwalk and climbing over the rocks that lined the inner edge. Then he'd jump down and run back to his parents, and repeat it. I completely understood why he would want to climb over the rocks, as I did it quite often myself.

      I waited until I was close enough that they could hear me, and called "Watch out" in a loud, clear voice. I didn't scream it, or yell, or anything to make them think I hated them or their boy. I did it exactly as I always did when needed, and others do as well. The mother looked around, saw me coming up behind them, looked around again and saw her son playing around, and pulled him to her side. As I passed, she said to me, "You are the one who should watch out." All I could think was, "What does she think I was doing?" I could have easily kept quiet and swerved around the boy, hoping he didn't move into my way at the last second. And I was keeping a much closer eye on him than she was. She didn't even know where he was when she looked and saw me. She had to look to find him, even though he was within 6 feet of her. And she is telling me to watch out???

      So, riding my bike was perfectly safe, because I rode it safely and responsibly. I was more responsible than many of the people walking, who were lost in their own thoughts. I watched out for them, since I knew they weren't watching out for me. And that is the way bicycling around groups of people should be. Let the couples walk slowly, whispering to each other, oblivious to everything around them. Although if you have a kid, look over once in a while to know they aren't missing. This lady never looked around until I called out to her. Other than this one incident, no one ever gave me any grief about it. And at that I think her reaction was more embarassment and sudden fear for her child than thinking I was at fault. Even when I would stop at the snack store and have lunch, no one ever came up and said how terrible I was for riding where they were walking. And the times that the crowds were too thick to safely ride, I would get off the bike and push it. The wheels and sprockets were just as dangerous, especialy to any hanging garments, but no one ever said I shouldn't have my bike there.

    9. Re:Take my Segway...please! by Toasty16 · · Score: 1

      A compliment? On Slashdot? haggar, you're my new best friend :-)

    10. Re:Take my Segway...please! by haggar · · Score: 1

      Sure, why not give credit where it's due. And btw, I'm trying to be fair about this at work, and everyday life, too.

      --
      Sigged!
  44. justice for an ethically flawed product? by vnv · · Score: 1, Insightful
    it will be good riddance if segway goes away.

    while people all over the world rely on the bicycle to get around -- and get some exercise -- only a greedy and fat US company would dare offer a $5000 no-exercise pod mobile.

    you can also think of a segway as a little coal power plant. the power electricity we use, the more pollution. or if you don't like coal, how about a nuclear power plant? it certainly doesn't run on solar power.

    segway's leverage of the corrupt government markets is another part of this company's devious business plan. by making industrial models that sell for far more than the standard $5000 model and then getting the public to pay for them.

    maybe the many millions of dollars that went into segway and all the hype could have used to build more bikepaths and walkways?

    all in all, a segway is nothing but a expensive toy that meets no actual societal needs. it is antoher remnant of the dotcom era meeting its just demise.

    1. Re:justice for an ethically flawed product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well i thought it was stupid (see my slow sales my ass post above) but now that you point out that a fat lazy american could use it to avoid excercise...well hell, I'm in. =)

      Silly Troll.

    2. Re:justice for an ethically flawed product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you can also think of a segway as a little coal power plant. the power electricity we use, the more pollution. or if you don't like coal, how about a nuclear power plant? it certainly doesn't run on solar power."

      I'm willing to bet that real power plants of any sort have better pollution stopping/environmental protection devices than your car.

      Do not follow the null point, for chaos and anarchy await at its end.

  45. Naive by Placido · · Score: 1

    >> ...as reasons for Segway's slow sales.

    Maybe I'm naive but I don't understand how sales of the Segway can resemble anything other than the pace of continental shift.

    Belay that... continental shift is faster than what I'm imagining. Think "static".

    --

    Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
    Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
  46. Re:These are DOA by YanceyAI · · Score: 1

    And a bike is A LOT lighter. Eighty pounds? Come on! This rules out me (I'm a reasonably stong girl, but not so strong as to want to lug 80 lbs. into my office stairs).

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  47. It doesn't matter . . . by apeleg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Segway is just a ruse, a delaying tactic until the real Ginger is released. ;)

    1. Re:It doesn't matter . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. As long as I get my hoverbike.

  48. Company Based in Manchester, NH? by tbmaddux · · Score: 1

    Ha. I'd like to see anyone at that company try to get around on a Segway after the snow we just got in New England.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    1. Re:Company Based in Manchester, NH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even when the weather is good up here, I have to tell you that I haven't seen a Segway around on the streets of either Manchester or Concord, nor in the shopping centers (Mall of NH, Steeplegate Mall), or in the neighboring superstores, e.g., Best Buy, Home Depot, etc.

      Dean's reputation up here is not exactly warm and fuzzy, either - he's known for being very arrogant/pushy and applying for a job with his various enterprises is a joke. I rather suspect that the various city councils or Boards of Selectmen in the south end of the state have given him a rather substantial view of the nails of their middle fingers when he's come to them demanding special privileges on the sidewalks for his customers.

      If the Segway was so revolutionary, I'd have thought that the stores - particularly the larger ones _inside_ the various mall would have set up parking spaces for Segways with free-recharging-while-you-shop gimmicks.

      It's a shame, because I'm sure that much of the engineering talent that went into Fred Estaire and Ginger will now be dissipated back out into the marketplace, instead of going back and designing follow-ons to Fred that would improve the quality of life for the disabled.

    2. Re:Company Based in Manchester, NH? by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      they're not out to the public yet, i'm one of 30 people that have them (early delivery contest, still needed to pay full price though)...in 30 to 60 days-- they're going to be out as people get their training and delivery.

  49. Old people by Degrees · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Andy Rooney on 60 Minutes rode one, and loved it. I could see it as a great product for old people who can't drive, still need to get to the market, and don't want to go too fast.

    Yes the price is a problem. And younger people would be willing to ride a bike. But my grandma could handle one of these things, and it would actually be a big help to her. She is otherwise stranded at home, dependent on taxis, neighbors, or public transportation (which in the wide- flat- towns of central California is problematic at best.)

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    1. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what we need. It's bad enough having old people who can't drive on the roads, now we have to have them on the sidewalks, too? I'd also love to see your grandma lift one of those things when she needs to get up on a curb and there is no ramp.

    2. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see it as a great product for old people who can't drive, still need to get to the market, and don't want to go too fast.

      Why can't they drive? Because they are dangerous on the streets. So how do we punish them? We put them on a [slow] moving object out on the streets with [fast] moving cars. You think a elderly person's hip-breaking fall in on the front porch was, bad, wait until they fall on pavement after hitting a pothole at 7mph. Is that a red light or a green light? I need to get closer to see. Oh no I can't stop.

      Honnnk! Splat.

    3. Re:Old people by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      If she can't drive a car... what makes you think she could drive this? At least a car offers you a good level of protection, but if your grandmother got in an accident with this there is no way she would survive.

    4. Re:Old people by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought minivans were bad enough, now I get to get stuck behind an elderly person with their segway's "blinker" on for a mile and a half...

      (no offense to your grandmother. I am sure she is an exception to the rule...)

    5. Re:Old people by garethwi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, your grandma should just buy a bike, and get cycling. Here in Holland, people of all ages ride bikes every day, it prolongs your health, and keeps you alert. The 80 year old woman next door used to right her bike every day to go shopping, and it never did her any harm.

      At least not until she was knocked down a killed by a truck.

    6. Re:Old people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>You think a elderly person's hip-breaking fall in on the front porch was bad

      Except you have the order wrong. Most people's hips break from bone degeneration, then they fall.

    7. Re:Old people by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      Yes the price is a problem. And younger people would be willing to ride a bike. But my grandma could handle one of these things, and it would actually be a big help to her. She is otherwise stranded at home, dependent on taxis, neighbors, or public transportation (which in the wide- flat- towns of central California is problematic at best.)

      Well, here is what I don't get about the segway, most people who have mobility problems severe enough to require assistance can't stand for extended periods of time either. In terms of the medical mobility market it seems to be targeting the narrow segment of disabilities where walking is problematic but standing is ok. On top of this, the old three-wheel electric scooter is half the price, fully covered by insurance and comes with plenty of cargo room.

    8. Re:Old people by Degrees · · Score: 1
      The answer to this is speed and hassle. The other cars in traffic go too fast, which means the driver has to either 1) drive faster than their mind can keep up, or 2) drive as slow as is safe (but becoming a hazard to the other people driving at normal speed.)

      And then there is the hassle of driving a big car - it really is a hassle to avoid hitting other things in a parking lot in a big car.

      Some other posters pointed out that the market segment is those that need electric wheelchairs. They are correct. If old people were to drive Segways, they would need the same right of way as the wheelchair-bound. One would hope they don't drive the Segways faster than they can react, either.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    9. Re:Old people by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Darwin at work.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  50. Huh? by Junky191 · · Score: 1

    You mean nobody wants to spend thousands of dollars on an electric scooter that makes you more certifiable than a pocket protector? What a shock...

  51. charging costs by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    "our car gets about 21 (18 city) miles per gallon, so i've saved about 5-6 gallons of gas in 100 miles / 14 days. as of today gas was about $1.71 per gallon, so that's 5 x $1.71 = $8.55. the car i gave up when i got t the segway ht got about the same mpg, so i think it's fine to use our current car figures. in other areas of the country, the price of gas might be lower or higher."

    And how much does it cost to charge up the segbeast?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:charging costs by Senior+Frac · · Score: 1

      I don't believe it was in this article, but I read another one from a Segway owner who claimed it was around US$0.10 for a full charge. I have no independent verification of that.

    2. Re:charging costs by giminy · · Score: 1

      "total cost to charge the ht for the 14 days of commuting = $0.06 x 14 = $0.84. in seattle we get 82% of our power from hydropower, seattle does not have coal or nuclear plants--it does get other power from other areas which do for the remaining percentage."

      He says it 2 lines below the gas prices.

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
    3. Re:charging costs by greenhide · · Score: 1
      And I quote:
      • total cost to charge the ht for the 14 days of commuting = $0.06 x 14 = $0.84. in seattle we get 82% of our power from hydropower, seattle does not have coal or nuclear plants--it does get other power from other areas which do for the remaining percentage.

      Not that I still don't think he's an ass:
      the book of seg is an informational site and personal journal of phillip torrone about the segway ht (human transporter). i am in no way affiliated with segway l.l.c. i do not work for or with segway in any way and i do not get paid to do any of this at all in any way. for the offical segway ht site, visit www.segway.com.
      Oh, aye? Then how come you've already got one of 'em, seeing as they don't ship till March 2003?!?

      He doesn't divulge that information, and I have a sinking suspicion that he was able to get his Segway in a manner that was considerably less expensive than most people.

      Also, for those of you wondering why he can segway to work, but not bike. I imagine that he goes on pedestrian paths that forbid the use of bikes. Since Segways aren't common, there are no laws banning them. But just you wait. If they get into common use, they will be banned from those pathways just as bikes are. And then he'll be fscked.
      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    4. Re:charging costs by Emexies · · Score: 1

      Actually, (from the site):

      one of the interesting benefits of ordering one was a contest that any pre-order customer could enter. to enter the contest the purchaser needed to write an essay, each week 6 people are selected to be flown to the segway ht headquarters in manchester, new hampshire, 2 full days of training on the segway ht, factory tour, a visit to dean kamen's house (the inventor of the segway ht), some special surprises and the most exciting thing of all, delivery of the segway ht before december 24th, 2002, 3-4 months before the general population gets them.

    5. Re:charging costs by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      it costs around 10 cents per full charge for me.

      cheers,
      pt

    6. Re:charging costs by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i paid full price, i got my early through the amazon contest, "early" was the prize, i still paid the full amount, it's on my site, folks here have posted the direct links and quotes. good god, no one reads anything and assumes everyone is up to no good. feel free to email me / call me if you have any more doubts or questions.

      cheers,
      pt

    7. Re:charging costs by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      This'll get modded down, but here goes . . .

      Must be nice to be able to blow five grand on a toy.

      Obviously someone with more money than brains. Or a paid shill.

    8. Re:charging costs by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i don't have much money, and brains-- i don't think i'm any different than most people. i used to spend $600 per month on car, insurance, parking, gas...now i don't. to purchase the ht i saved $ for the last year writing books, software, ebooks, not going out to eat, not buying many things i usually would, working hard. i've never been paid in any way, in any form by segway, book of seg is my personal site about me using the ht, feel free to email / call me if you have any more doubts or questions.

  52. Ginger Anyone? by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Maybe if they actually sold Ginger they could make money. There is a lot of evidence supporting that the IT-Segway is NOT Ginger.

    In other news Sluggy Freelance just finished up a Segway spoof strip.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  53. What was the target market? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    The Segway thing is another good example of another product that was created at great expense because it seemed a 'cool thing to make' with no thought as to who would actually buy one.

    It costs $5000 dollars. Anyone wih 5 grand spare to spend on a Segway would probably rather be seen in their BMW than pootling along the pavement on one of these.

    I put this on the pile of "cool ideas that'll never work in the real world" along with picture messaging.

  54. Blizzard Friendly? by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

    How many vehicles are good to drive in a blizzard? Bicycles, motorcycles, and automobiles with low ground clearance all suck when it gets deep and slippery. For those people that don't drive cars (two wheels are plenty for me) winter in general sucks, but you find ways to make it work.

    1. Re:Blizzard Friendly? by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      During the blizzard that may be true but afterwords it is a totally different story. Today the roads and sidewalks in Manhattan are relatively clear (at least in midtown) and you could get around on foot, bike or car no problem but I have no idea how you would get around on a segway.

      First of all, it is supposed to be used on the sidewalk. Right now there are small, one-person wide spaces for people to get from sidewalk to road. There is no way for a segway to fit.

      As for riding in the street. A bike has high, skinny wheels which can actually cut through a few inches of snow, more if you have a mountain bike. The segway is low riding with smaller, wider tires. Even if it can get through the snow your feet would be covered in slush after two minutes.

      Finally, a bike is light enough to life over your head if you need to get past a snow bank. I'd like to see you do that in a segway.

    2. Re:Blizzard Friendly? by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I think the point is:
      In a blizzard, a car at *least* keeps you dry. I got to work fine yesterday in my car. The segway probably wouldn't have made it out of the driveway, and I'd have been drenched while trying.

      The segway is a bicycle replacement that costs as much as a car. Like one of the parents posted: Useless.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  55. Re:Jesus Saves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed he does, but why does he need a Segway? He can translocate by will alone, after all.

    Think man, think!!!

  56. Another possibility by howman · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is not so much the lack of spending in business, or the speed of the unit, perhaps not even the difficulties Segway has faced in California...
    On one level, a design standpoint, people might not feel comfortable with the layout of the unit. From the 1800's we have been trained to see a two wheel vehicle with one wheel in front of the other, now Segway comes along and changes the visual and expects people to be comfortable with it. I will equate it with the feeling you get when you arrive at a web page that automatically takes you to full screen with no navigator in sight. I know it is like apples and oranges, but the feeling of discomfort at looking or using something you are not used to on a vernacular level is the same.
    Another example is the steering concept Mercedes developed a number of years ago which used two joysticks to control direction, speed and braking. Now in a spaceship, you wouldn't want anything but, as Will Smith showed us in Independance Day, but in a car, although it provided the same control, the comfort level of the driver was its downfall.
    Now on another level, the technology has not been proven, well it has but on a very limited scale. How many people do you know personally have used one even once for more than 5 min? Have you used one for more than 5 min?
    On the last level, perhaps people have a subconscious adversion to trusting a gyroscope to keep them upright. Intelectually they may trust the science behind it but still feel like they are going to hit a stone and end up looking like one of those liquid filled glass birds drinking out of a glass, or flying off the thing like when they were kids flying down the hill on a skateboard.

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen plenty of two-wheeled vehicles with the layout of a Segway - in grocery stores. I've even seen store employees "riding" the things.

      It's not the layout. It's the sheer impracticality of the things.

  57. I like the segway by Lord_Pall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay.. I know the segway is pretty useless for day to day life, but I was fortunate enough to actually use one in a few situations during my vacation in december...

    Seadream Yacht Club (a cruise line), has 4 segways per ship for passenger use (the ships are very small, so that's actually an okay number).

    We went on our cruise the week after they got them, so they were still experimenting with their itinerary. We learned how to use them in nassau, on the pier right off of the ship.

    They work exactly as every test driver has stated.. Once you get comfortable on them, you just think about moving forward and you go forward. It's all based off of the weight distribution on your feet. There's a tendency to lean forward to try and make it go faster, but this goes away eventually.

    Turning is a little weirder as it's geared off of your hand motion (sort of like a motorcycle throttle). If you are going full speed forward (depending on the key your using to control the max speed), and turn, you're going to fall off. That was something we had to learn to deal with..

    Anyhow.. after we learned how to drive them, we got to use them in a heavy pedestrian traffic area.. Key West. We used them for a quick tour of the island, driving on the streets and sidewalks, weaving into and out of traffic, bicyclists and pedestrians flawlessly. They stop on a dime, turn on a dime, and will throw you to the ground on a dime if you're not careful.

    For day to day use (for most people), they're completely useless. For people who need to interact with pedestrian traffic, they're great.

    The place i'd like to see them used more is in the vacation industry. Seadream is planning on using them for tours of portofino, and other places in europe. This is where it would truly shine.

    The last thing that I find a little weird is that Seadream had a decent amount of trouble actually getting segway to talk to them and sell them units. For a company thats having problems moving product, they should probably change their policy in dealin with outside vendors.

    Sure they only wanted 8 or 10 of them, but given the clientele and quantity of people who will get to use/see them, it's free advertising.

    If they could get them to be a little lighter (under the 86 pounds they're at now), and a little more collapsible (so you could carry it with you on vacation), and made them a little cheaper (1500 bux or so)..

    I think they've got a chance.. Otherwise it's just a novelty

    1. Re:I like the segway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyhow.. after we learned how to drive them, we got to use them in a heavy pedestrian traffic area.. Key West.

      I'm glad you remember that moment, because right then you were the biggest dipshit on earth.

    2. Re:I like the segway by gethane · · Score: 1

      I just spent a week at Disneyworld and we saw a few Disney employees utilizing these in the parks. I remember thinking at the time, "What a great idea!" Of course, my feet hurt the whole week I was there, so employees using wheelchairs with souped up motors might've seemed like a great idea.

      I think there are many places these things could be very useful. I commute 50 minutes on 4 lane highway to work, so they wouldn't work for me, but at Disney I thought it was brilliant.

    3. Re:I like the segway by daffmeister · · Score: 1
      The place i'd like to see them used more is in the vacation industry. Seadream is planning on using them for tours of portofino, and other places in europe. This is where it would truly shine.

      Oh great. Now we're going to have lots of loud Americans with their Hawaiian shirts and windshield-sized sun glasses zooming around Piazza San Marco and the Vatican on their Segways. Guidebook in one hand and camera in the other.

  58. "Only 2 per customer", Amazon by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    Guess the swollowed the hype hard. What ever happened to market research. Dreams are fine but we Americans can crush dreams like this in heart beat. Then buy it cheaper in five years at liquidation values.

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  59. To be completely honest.... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...this is the best story Slashdot has posted in a long time. You don't know how happy it makes me to hear that this company is in financial trouble. This was a moronic idea from the start. A friggin $4k+ SCOOTER?

    This scooter (and I love calling it that since Dean thinks it shouldn't be called such a demoralizing name) had several problems from the start.

    1. Can it keep you warm in the winter? NO
    2. Can it keep you cool in the summer? NO
    3. Will you be able to take girls out on a date on such a thing? Possibly but no girl will agree to such an arraingement so effectively the answer is NO
    4. Will you look cool on such a contraption? Yes for 5 minutes. For the rest of all eternity, NO (and yes this one matters you anti-conformist geeks. Normal people care if they look like geeks and try to avoid doing so.)
    5. Is it as cheap as most other scooters? NO
    6. Will it get stolen as soon as you park it next to your local trendy cafe? YES
    7. Is it awkward? YES.
    8. Was it overhyped? YES.
    9. Will it in the words of Steven Peter Jobs, CEO and Founder of Apple and CEO of Pixar "change the way cities are built?" NO. Don't listen to Jobs. He knows Macs. He knows animation. He knows nothing else.
    10. And top ten on the NDP's list of why the Segway sucks, "FAT MAN ON A LITLE SCOOTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:To be completely honest.... by garcia · · Score: 1

      6. Will it get stolen as soon as you park it next to your local trendy cafe? YES

      No. first of all, there aren't going to be enough of these for people not to notice the damn thing. second, no self-respecting thief would dare steal this thing. The resale value is fucking $0.

      Even the thieves are smart enough not to take this fucking thing when the price is right.

    2. Re:To be completely honest.... by toyotaboy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'd have to say there's a long long list of problems with this idea. It's a neat concept (balanced by a computer with sensors), but it's just not ready for today's world. Quite frankly I'd be more impressed with a bicycle like device that could fold down to the size of a backpack (tiny wheels).. People truly are getting lazy, it's bad enough we drive a mile down the road to the local 7-11, now we need a device to replace walking? and then pay some more to hop on a machine to simulate walking up stairs? What has mankind turned into? I hope his company folds and we start seeing segways on ebay for $100, and I probably still wouldn't buy one

    3. Re:To be completely honest.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Jobs really doesn't know much about animation. It's his buddy, John Lasseter, that's the animation genius. Jobs is just the money.

      'least that's how I see it.

    4. Re:To be completely honest.... by bannerman · · Score: 1

      3. Will you be able to take girls out on a date on such a thing? Possibly but no girl will agree to such an arraingement so effectively the answer is NO

      Actually, I would imagine a segway would be a great pick up vehicle.. since 99.9999998% of the girls out there have never seen one before. C'mon, admit it.. you'd jump at the chance to try out a segway. Most girls would probably jump at the chance to ride a segway with you, as long as you weren't particularly creepy or smelly or huge. Huge being the most important one, since it might make it physically impossible....

      --
      I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
    5. Re:To be completely honest.... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      girls do seem to like the segway ht, most of the people i talk to on my commute are women, cool ones at that.

    6. Re:To be completely honest.... by bannerman · · Score: 1

      I believe you, and I believe they're cool... but the test is, do they talk back to you? :)

      --
      I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
  60. True genius. by StressedEd · · Score: 2, Funny

    South park. Episode 511 "The Entity". Nuff said.

    I saw it yesterday and nearly choked I was laughing so hard! Look here for a still from the episode.

    Summed up popular opinion at the time quite well...

    --
    Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
  61. Overbuild by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    I think the SegWay suffers from extreme overbuild. They really should have initially targeted the $2000 market then offered an upscale/ more durable model to industrial buyers. They also should have been prepared to handle 3-5 years of losses during product introduction.

    Take a look at newcomers to the US auto market like KIA and DaeWoo as a model. For $1,000 I can buy a really nice Mountainbike-road hybrid and mount a small 2hp motor on it that has most of the advantages of the Segway.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  62. not only are they useless, by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    and overpriced, but you can't find them anywhere. if you want to revolutionize the world with your product, you don't make it only available from amazon and a few other random places online- you sell it at wal-mart. if the segway were significantly cheaper and could be found in the bike section of wal-mart or target, people would probably be buying them...

    ...but they're not. :)

  63. Cost by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
    This is what it all boils down too: cost. They are trying to market this unit to a crowd of highly educated and even technical (Silicon Valley, Research Triangle, etc) people. Highly educated and technical people understand how much it really costs to build such a machine. Since they are targeting corporate America, they should be aware that many of their potential customers know how to sniff out a bad marketing ploy. The overblown price reveals to us how their marketing people are trying for massive profit margins. These little machines are far less complicated and cost far to build then a good motorcycle or even a used Honda Civic, so why do they cost as much as one?

    You just can't demand what they're asking, period.

  64. Not seling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps it's just the suck factor.

  65. Cars faced similar problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They were of limited use in a world populated by pedestrians and horse-drawn carriages, and there weren't very many good roads for them in the early years. Many people argued they'd be of use to any one and that horses were better. (They didn't break down as much!). But after a couple decades, car builders managed to make them more reliable, and roads were built, and now many people can't imagine living without one.

    1. Re:Cars faced similar problems by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      But after a couple decades, car builders managed to make them more reliable, and roads were built, and now many people can't imagine living without one.
      Good point. Price, weight, maximum load, portability, distance between recharges, suitable roads - when (or if) these are improved, electric (or perhaps not-yet-invented-technology-powered) scooters will become popular. But I still prefer anti-gravity belts for short distances and teleportation for longer ones.
  66. Another Miss, Clever Nonetheless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Kamen has a history of being brilliant. Sometimes that translates to reality, like some of his medical devices. Other times, he misses the mark. Look at the iBot: bloody genius piece of hardware that could help people with disabilities lead better lives. But the thing is horrendously expensive, and the vast majority of the people who could use it can't come close to affording it. My wife happens to use a conventional electric wheelchair... and even that costs US$8,000. Insurance companies won't touch something like the iBot.

    The Segway isn't so expensive, but it has simple social stigmas attached to it: it looks utterly ridiculous, and does present a hazard to pedestrians, regardless of what the company might say to the contrary.

    Sure Jobs got excited about it... he's another guy who thinks outside the box. Most people prefer the comfort of their boxes, however. God bless 'em both for having the courage to be original in a world that rewards conformity, and languishes in complacency.

  67. "it's more important than the Internet" - Metcalf by Captain+Morgan · · Score: 1

    Hahahahahahah ABCNews story

  68. It's a friggin $4000 scooter! by bigdady92 · · Score: 0

    Um i can buy a razor scooter that moves faster for $50 and attach a gas powered engine to it and it'll last 10X as long. 1. Create product. 2. ??????? 3. PROFIT! ahh the old dot com thought proccesses are alive and kicking.

    --
    Wheel of Time: Book by Book and Sumview (summary review) Bigdady92 style: http://bigdady92.blogspot.com/
  69. Ginger or Marianne? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    Ginger: $5000
    Marianne: free! winner! winner!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  70. Gretzky Scores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a bumper sticker seen around Edmonton years ago:
    "Jesus saves. Gretzky gets the rebound. He shoots. He scores!"

  71. Segway: The 21st century Edsel by mj01nir · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really, the parallels are striking. Secrecy leading up to release that caused rampant speculation. Overhyped to the point that the public really thought that something revolutionary was in the offing. Released at the beginning of an economic downturn.

    And then the let-down. "Oh, it's just a car/scooter." Then people stay away in droves.

    There are many overviews of the history of Edsel. Read this one or dig up another and see if you agree.

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  72. Sinclair C5 anyone? by MrMickS · · Score: 1

    The Segway is the 2000's equivalent of the Sinclair C5 (a 1980's electic personal transport vehicle). No doubt a good technical achievement it can't compete with the tried and tested designs of bicycles, motorcycles and cars. The road systems are designed for particular modes of transport unless you have something that can move through a different medium, floating the air perhaps, failure is assured.

    --
    You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
  73. Deja Vu? by way2trivial · · Score: 0
    This so smacks of sir clive sinclair
    and his downfall, the c5

    it's known as history people...

    Sinclair- noted inventor, compared to edison
    Sinclair- invented novel weather exposed,
    and not very compatible with existing traffic
    vehicle, that a few die-hards bought, and killed his rep & company

    http://www.sinclairc5.com/sinclairstory/c5built.ht m

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  74. Tis a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Tis a shame"

    Yes, indeed, Mary Poppins.
    You tis a fucking idiot.

  75. Segway. Nothing to see here. by AlgUSF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stupidest invention ever. I own a 2002 Honda Civic, let's compare it to the Segway.

    Segway:
    Top Speed: 12MPH
    Range : 10 Miles
    Max Occupants: 1


    Honda Civic:
    Top Speed: 110MPH
    Max Occupants: 5 (Plus a huge trunk for storage)
    Range : Unlimited (or until I run out of gas money)

    Considering my Honda Civic cost only 3 times as much as a segway, and I get much more utility from it. I live in Florida, so an A/C is required (or it is no better than my bike).

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  76. Re:Jesus Saves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From a bumper sticker seen in the Edmonton area years ago:
    "Jesus saves. Gretzky gets the rebound. He shoots. He scores!"

  77. Ninnle Saves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Ninnle into your system today!

    The ONLY Way, Truth and OS!

  78. Word of 'mouth' by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    It's not surprising they're not selling seeing as you can't even buy them yet. Sure, you can pre-order them from Amazon, but there's no indication of how long you'd have to wait to get them - they say they'll start shipping them on the 1st of March, but who knows how fast they can make them, and how many other people are in the queue first? I'm sure some people who are considering getting one are going to wait a little while.

    Also, I think they're probably one of those things that perhaps one person in a community will get, a bunch of people will have a go and love 'em, and you'll start getting a lot more purchases.

    'Course, lowering the price wouldn't hurt, either...

  79. Seuss-cycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The damn things look like something Dr. Seuss might have invented for geting around Whoville.

  80. Maybe he should try putting them in stores by elliotj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I for one am very interested in the Segway. I might even buy one. But I've never, ever, seen one 'in the flesh'. I can't go into a store to buy one. I don't know anybody who has one.

    It's such a new product and so unusual that for people to buy one sight-unseen at this high a price requires a leap of faith that is uncommon amongst consumers.

    This guy needs to put them in stores. Lots of stores. The stores need to let people test ride them. They need to do demonstrations in the streets at lunch time so people can see how cool they are.

    I wouldn't be surprised to see them be a big hit, but the average guy will want to try one first.

    1. Re:Maybe he should try putting them in stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd probably buy one too. But, until it's like a car dealership -- where I can go in and take one for a test drive -- forget it. I'm not buying one online from Spamazon. I want to also see some different models. How about one with a seat? How about some choice of colors/accessories? If you don't let people test drive them you aren't going to sell very many for $5K a pop.

    2. Re:Maybe he should try putting them in stores by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 1

      What he needs to do is hook up with a car manufacturer. VW would be my first choice. Talk them into building a "Segway Edition" Passat or GTI. Then he'd have a distribution channel that let people test drive the Segway.

      It's easier to bury five grand in a thirty thousand dollar price-tag than it is to sell it on it's own. Especially when financing becomes as easy as getting an auto loan. VW would probably get a ton of people coming to their dealerships to test it out. Since they seem to target the same demographic, it could be a win-win.

    3. Re:Maybe he should try putting them in stores by drivers · · Score: 1

      Not only that but the last I heard you were required to go to a training course in New Hampshire to get one as well. You can only buy them from Amazon and you have to wait before you can get it. Never underestimate the power of instant gratification.

  81. Going, Going... by Steve+B · · Score: 1, Funny
    Kamen declares himself "somewhat pleased and surprised" that so many state legislators agreed to change their laws to accommodate his scooter

    It's hardly surpising that the laws are for sale. Now that the money machine has sputtered and died, they'll change back quickly enough as soon as the first pedestrian with any pull gets clobbered (they don't all have indoor parking).

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  82. Re:You got the secret square by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok you win the top secret prize. I made a bet with Steve Jobs that I could sell shit to the whole world. It's not working as well as I planned. Wobblie if you contact me at our toll free number 1-866-4SEGWAY I will gladly redeem your prize of 1 fresh off the assembly line SHT.
    Dean Kamen

  83. It's a highly impractical toy by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in New England. We got 27" of snow here this week. And, when it isn't snowing -- it's either cold, raining, or miserable out. Out of 365 days it is probably nice, warm and sunny about 85 of them. So if you want to talk about impractical -- the Segway is it. If you live in Arizona where it is warm and sunny 91% of the time.... sure. But, in this climate a Segway is nothing but an expensive toy that you can putz around on. It's not going to replace the automobile anytime soon!

  84. I already have the ORIGINAL Segway! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's see, one person transport, two wheels?

    Tried and true technology, been around since the 19th century, with plenty of refinements that have made it better over the years...

    Oh, and no %$#@$#% batteries to charge...EVER!

    It's called a bicycle!

  85. Poor segway by YAN3D · · Score: 1

    I always thought is was a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

  86. Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I get so angry reading the comments posted here about the Segway. Move on if you don't want to read some vitriol. I'm sorry, but it needs to be said.

    Look - the Segway is an attempt to alleviate the total unmitigated disaster that is modern automotive traffic.

    If you could all be so kind as to take a step back.. waaayyy back. Think of cars, particularly in cities. The fatalities. The noise. The pollution. The cost. The traffic. The space they take up. Were a self-respecting geek to examine this system from above, encountering it for the first time, I imagine they would recoil in horror. I can't see it as anything but a giant cluster-fuck.

    Look at New York, downtown. Practically everyone living there would tell you that traffic is nigh-on impossible. But still, we tolerate it. We love our cars. We cannot give them up, not now, not ever... in fact, we want bigger ones!

    People will not come to terms with the fact that the responsible thing to do is to explore these options. We simply must.

    Now, I am fully aware of the Segway's limitations. Obviously it has problems with inclement weather, battery life, etc. Again, I must remind the reader that this is the first of it's kind. The arguments presented against the Segway are often ludicrous:

    - "i can't use my hands".. you can't when you drive either
    - "i've gotta stand up".. that's part of the point, they take up less room
    - "they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger.

    Come on! We are the ones who should be embracing this! Who's gonna convince Kamen to invent the Segway you really want? You know, the chariot version, that gets 5x the distance, and is 1/5 the price? It cannot get here by itself.

    I'm sorry for the rant, but frankly the blank-faced pessimism disgusts me. Where is your sense of wonder, Slashdot? Don't be like those fucking lemmings who close the case on new technology before it's even been tried.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*

      We have a sense of wonder... but, we don't have $5K to blow on useless toys (besides computers).

    2. Re:Goddammit! by haggar · · Score: 1

      The segway is a replacement for a bicicle, and a very poor replacement, at that. It forces you to stand all the time, sometimes even increasing the strain on your knees. It forces you to recharge the battery pack instead of just using your muscles to move around. It's slower than the bicicle. It's heavier and wider, apparently less manageable, too. Since batteries used in this manner decay relatively quickly, you'll have to change that a few times in segway's lifecycle, and these batteries are extremely non-environment-friendly.

      Did I mention that a bicicle is much cheaper, too?

      So, if you were really genuinely worried about the cars in the cities (I am, for one), you would advocate bicicles, not segways.

      --
      Sigged!
    3. Re:Goddammit! by Oswald · · Score: 1
      - "i can't use my hands".. you can't when you drive either

      It's not a replacement for driving. It goes 12.5 mph. It's a replacement for walking. In some ways it's an improvement (faster, less work) on walking, and in other ways it's not as good (limited range, no exercise, and my feet don't crowd me in a restroom stall while I'm taking a crap).

      This thing is neither fish nor fowl; it has very limited utility.

    4. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      gggrrr I get angry too. The segway is NOT a replacement for bicycles. Its a whole new class of transport object. The only thing it has in common with a bicycle is the handlebars and the fact that the wheels are round as well! Apart from those 2 physically similar components everything else is different. You wouldn't say that the razor scooter was a replacement for bicycles. Or those sneekers with hidden roller skate wheels.
      I am shocked by the closed minded attitude of slashdotters over the segway.

    5. Re:Goddammit! by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Look at New York, downtown.

      Have you ever been to New York? Foot traffic can often be just as bad as automobile traffic, especially during the summer. I dread having to go anywhere near Time Square during the summer. The sidewalks are overflowing with people. Now imagine it if everybody was just a little bit wider and a lot more inflexible.

      Or do you assume that they can eliminate automobile traffic completely? What about the trucks and buses? Do you suppose that Segways will eliminate the need for these, too?

      What about safety? Do you know how many times I have almost plowed into somebody while walking because they stopped short to look in a window or answer their cell phone? Can you imagine that disaster?

      I recommend you get out of your ivory tower and actually take a walk sometime and see what it is really like out there.

    6. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an idea!! Let's tie the entire infrastructure of a major metropolitan area to a single proprietary product!!

      ""they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger."
      Have you even been to NYC before? You can not ride a bike on the sidewalk you moron.

    7. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am shocked by the closed minded attitude of slashdotters over the segway.

      Yeah. You would think that there would be more slashdotters who are so oblivious to how things work in the real world that they believe that segway is a good idea. I never knew that most slashdotters actually have common sense.

    8. Re:Goddammit! by Giant+Killer · · Score: 1

      dean? is that you?

    9. Re:Goddammit! by superdan2k · · Score: 1

      You make an excellent point about modern traffic being an unmitigated disaster...and you're dead right. If you haven't read The Immortal Class by Travis Hughley, I suggest you do. It's a book that starts off as the bio of a bike messenger, but it quickly builds into something important -- an examination of modern cities and what's wrong with them.

      He's right, too -- modern cities in America had their roads laid out before the advent of the automobile, and as such aren't able to maintain the large amounts of traffic that pass through them.

      I think there's more to it, though -- I think that the suburbs are a key issue...you have this little insular enclaves where it's safe for the breeders to raise their progeny away from the "harsh reality" of the city. We've created a situation where for people to get where their jobs are, they need either private transportation or good public transportation...and most cities in the U.S. are SEVERELY lacking in the latter. So cars it is.

      I can't believe Kamen (and Jobs and all the other investors) thought that the Segway was a good idea. No protection from the elements (let's see anyone use one in Minneapolis in February), big, clunky, a target for theft, you can't put blinged-out rims on it, no room for a subwoofer...shit sorry about that, hit the Eminem track in my iPod... Anyway, the things are totally impractical and priced well outside the means of most commuters. $5000? You can get a beautiful custom Seven Axiom Titanium for that, or you could buy a cheaper Trek and still have money left to pay off those pesky credit cards, get a gym membership and buy a stack of Playstation2 games.

      --
      blog |
    10. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you suppose that Segways will eliminate the need for these, too?

      Lol. I have this picture of a huge two wheel Segtruck. The segtruck is just huge and this big truck driver controls it by shifting his balance. The segbus is even funnier, since everyone has to help control the speed.

    11. Re:Goddammit! by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      - "i can't use my hands".. you can't when you drive either

      You're oversimplifying. When you walk, you carry something, when you drive, you can put something on the seat next to you, when you use a Segway, the best you can do is wear a backpack. But can you really go grocery shopping for a family of four with one of these, or buy a new computer and take it home, etc? I don't think so. We'll still need our cars to do simple and mundane tasks.

      Sure I'm impressed with the technology in the Segway and most /.ers probably are too. But I don't have a practical use for this thing. I live in the suburbs, if I want to go into the city, the Segway won't get me there and I'm not interested in carrying the thing onto a bus or a train.

      Also, this country is so frigging overweight and you want to encourage people to walk LESS? The best part of being in the city is walking around. In the short term, a Segway might be a fun addition, but in the long term, I know I'd prefer to walk. Getting there faster doesn't make the journey more enjoyable.

      --Atlantix

    12. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Have you ever been to New York? Foot traffic can often be just as bad as automobile traffic, especially during the summer. I dread having to go anywhere near Time Square during the summer. The sidewalks are overflowing with people. Now imagine it if everybody was just a little bit wider and a lot more inflexible.

      Yeah, I've been there. It is totally crowded. Because people can't DRIVE. So they walk.

      Now, picture the roads being used for Segways (suspend your guffaws for a sec and just imagine, okay? Please?) How many Segway's can you fit in a lane?

      What about safety?

      Exactly! Safety! Why do people attack the Segway when cars are one of the top-10 causes of death?

      I recommend you get out of your ivory tower and actually take a walk sometime and see what it is really like out there.

      Alright, I will do that. In the meantime, open your mind a little.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    13. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      - "they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger.

      I disagree. While rollerblades and bikes can easily match the speed of a segway, you aren't taking weight into consideration. Segways weigh 95 pounds.

      I don't know about you, but I don't see many obese people on rollerblades. It's just not an activity that the obese are likely to do. Segways, on the other hand, are ideal for heavier people. Great mobility with little to no effort.

      So, not only do segway weigh a lot more than roller blades, those riding the segways will probably be heavier too. (I'm not going to discuss bikes because if a bike is going 10 mph, it's going to be in it's own dedicated lane, off of the sidewalk)

      Now, which is going to do more damage to a pedestrian at 10 mph, a 175 pound person, or a 200+ pound person riding a 95 pound metal vehicle. That's easily over 300 pounds, and the metal bars aren't going to feel good.

      A segway is going to hit you like a linebacker,

    14. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      If you haven't read The Immortal Class by Travis Hughley, I suggest you do.

      Thanks, I'll look for that.

      I can't believe Kamen (and Jobs and all the other investors) thought that the Segway was a good idea. No protection from the elements (let's see anyone use one in Minneapolis in February), big, clunky, a target for theft, you can't put blinged-out rims on it, no room for a subwoofer

      I can. Kamen's the consummate future optimist. This is a trait you can see in lots of 'genius' type people; they simply can't understand why people just don't get with the program and come up with something better. Then they are confused when this happens.

      I think it's overpriced, and has issues. But it's version one. Everyone side-steps that. His plan was sound, sell to vertical markets, get it in front of people and prove it's safe. But the next version - and especially the economies of scale that will allow for cheaper versions - will be better. If they hang in there, that is.

      The thing I'm pissed about is that everyone on this forum, supposedly a forward-thinking forum, wants to knife the baby before it's even grown up just a little. And that's sad.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    15. Re:Goddammit! by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      the ht weighs 80lbs, not 95.

      even on my segway ht, i weigh less than most americans.

      here's an article i wrote about my cargo and segway ht weight stuff.

      http://www.bookofseg.com/weight

      cheers,
      pt

    16. Re:Goddammit! by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know even where to begin. People don't walk becaus they can't drive. Most people who live in Manhattan don't even own cars. There is no need for them. There are subways and buses that take you pretty much anywhere (except for the East Side but someday there will be a 2nd avenue line). People walk from public transportation to their office.

      There are some people who drive into the city but most of the traffic in the city is cabs, trucks, and buses and those are three things that aren't going to be replace by segways. I can just see some tourists coming in from the airport with their luggage being dragged behind them on its rollers.

      As for safety, cars and bicycles don't ride on the sidewalk (at least not legally). There is only interaction between pedestrians and automobiles when people cross the street. With segways the idea is that pedestrians and segways would be interwoven.

      There is a big difference between being realistic and being closed minded.

    17. Re:Goddammit! by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      You mentioned "exploring the options" and I believe that is true, we should explore options. However, the Segway is a joke. It should have never gone this far. Using it in a city is like using a yacht to cross a pond. far better alternatives already exist. To name a few... skateboard, rollerblade, bicycle, scooter, that are a mere fraction of the price. If hyundai can profit off an $8000 car that accomdates 4 people, I am positive that a one person limited range vehicle could be produced for $5000 that absolutely blows the Segway away. quads and trikes are cheaper than that, go faster, have a longer range, and current designs could easily be modified to de-emphasize all terain performance and accomodate additional storage and run cleaner. The segway's criticism is well deserved. Environmental extremists have been predicting the end of the world due to the destruction of the environment for at least a century now- and it just isnt going to happen, not now.. not on in my children's lifetime, and I would be willing to bet my entire lifetime's income that it wont happen in my grandchildren's time or at any point in the future. If we do start seeing some real environmental damage affecting our live's, an enterprising person will design a nice portable bike that will be an instant craze in places like manhattan. The segway was a horrible idea, and anyone should have seen that just from the claims that it would revolutionize the world. Revolutions like that do not get planned, they just happen.

    18. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I hear what you're saying. New York was probably a bad example because they have a subway. Subway systems are still a rarity in the world.

      You seem to think I'm advocating that the Segway could solve all of NY's traffic problems if only everyone bought one, and that's obviously not true.

      My problem is that people seem to hate the Segway, which strikes me as narrow-minded. The thing obviously has huge potential.

      I guess, in the end, all the arguments about how hard one will hit you, or how inconveinent it would be in rain, or how expensive the Segway is.... I just cannot get past the automobile's higher cost, harder impact, higher price environmentally.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    19. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Alright, I've already answered most of your points in other posts on this thread, I'm tired of typing, so I'll precis my position:

      - Segway is not a bike, it cannot be compared to any self-powered vehicle.
      - it is the first of its kind and while it has problems for sure, it should be improved, not scorned.
      - Of course your car seems like a better value-proposition now, it has massive economies of scale behind it.
      If we do start seeing some real environmental damage affecting our live's, an enterprising person will design a nice portable bike that will be an instant craze in places like manhattan.

      Boy, I don't know about you man, but I see all kinds of evidence staring me in the face. I'm terrified of what I see. Apparently they can't grow wheat in large parts of Canada's prairies now. The number of tropical storms around the Gulf of Mexico have increased exponentially in the last 10 years. Giant chunks of the ice shelf are snapping off.

      But even if all this stuff doesn't matter... we shouldn't pollute if we can help it, right?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    20. Re:Goddammit! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      You're oversimplifying. When you walk, you carry something, when you drive, you can put something on the seat next to you, when you use a Segway, the best you can do is wear a backpack. But can you really go grocery shopping for a family of four with one of these, or buy a new computer and take it home, etc? I don't think so. We'll still need our cars to do simple and mundane tasks.


      I think this is what Kamen was talking about when he mentionedc revolutionizing how cities were designed. With quick and reliable transportation at your disposal there is no need to put off shopping for your family of four to the point that you must take the car to the grocery. If you need something, just pop down to the corner grocery on your Segway.

      What?!? You don't have a corner grocery? Of course you don't, your city hasn't been redesigned yet. And why hasn't your city been redesigned? Because not enough people have Segways.

      It may seem like a chicken and the egg arguement, but it isn't. The Segway will enter the market slowly. First it will be a luxery item, then policemen and postmen will get it, and it will expand through the marketplace from there. As it gains acceptance cities will evolve to accomodate it.

      None of this is certain though. The soft economy and crushing amounts of hype have done a good deal of damage to the Segway. But the fate of the scooter is by no means sealed.

    21. Re:Goddammit! by sulli · · Score: 1
      Again, I must remind the reader that this is the first of its kind.

      I've had my current bicycle since 1986. Price: $235 new. Total spent on repairs: probably $500. Yes, if I were physically unable to ride it (and if they guy were actually trying to sell me one), Segway might be interesting, but for me a bicycle is a much better choice.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    22. Re:Goddammit! by Tsunamio · · Score: 1

      Hunter S. Thompson, I think it was, tried to get elected to mayor of Aspen on a platform of (among other things) tearing up town streets and replacing them with grass. More and more I think that's a great idea.

      Then, of course, someone comes and calls me an idiot, but that's how these things go

    23. Re:Goddammit! by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Blank faced pessimism? Excuse me, but this thing was the most overhyped POS ever released. They promised something that would revolutionalize the world and give us a scooter. What do you expect our reaction to be? As for the traffic problem, it obviously isn't too bad if, "We cannot give them up, not now, not ever... in fact, we want bigger ones!". The reason traffic is bad is because there are a LOT of people in cities. That's it. If everyone was walking you would still have a "giant cluster-fuck". Maybe less deaths, and less polution, but people use cars because it gets them where they want to go faster, more comfortably than any other way available, and they are willing the except the risks involved. If you are so down on traffic try not using ANY form of motorized transportation for a week and tell me how fun it is. Traffic will always be a problem, but we'll get the pollution part figured out in not too long. There is simply no need for overpriced scooters.

    24. Re:Goddammit! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      People don't do the "responsible thing" as a rule. They do what works for them, in their lives. And it's not just "I need a bigger fancier car", it's more often "Crap, my old car is too small now -- where are the kids going to sit??" or "it was fine to drive a deathtrap when I was by myself, but now I have kids to keep safe".

      I agree that NYC would be a great market -- not necessarily for existing drivers (after all, a lot of people commute multiple miles from locations that don't OFFER public transport) but for the many NYers who don't drive at all, and are currently dependent on taxis (expensive) and public transport (which may not go where they need to be). The seasonal drawback -- well, NYC is experiencing it right now. Being outdoors (and the Segway IS "being outdoors" while you're using it) in cold and blizzard conditions is not suitable for most people. But you'd still have a good 6+ months where it could be used without suffering hypo- or hyperthermia.

      Even with any such drawbacks, if they could price and market it to the "I'd like a bicycle but pedaling is too damn much work" and the "...but I'm afraid of falling off" populations, IMO they'd have a market winner.

      As to "standing up" -- is there any real reason they can't have a "butt bar" type of seat, that lets a person rest their weight while remaining in an upright position?? Would need care to retain the device's balance properties, but I'd think it could be done.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    25. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Look - the Segway is an attempt to alleviate the total unmitigated disaster that is modern automotive traffic."

      So any attempt to fix it - no matter how expensive, ineffectual or...well, ridiculous - has to be a good thing, right?

      Ok, how about...flying shoes!!! Shoes with compressed air, keeping you 1 inch above the ground. Good for 20 metres at a stretch. Oh, but you can then quickly add a replacement gas-pack. Yeah, its stupid, but think of the chiiiiidren!!

      Next.

    26. Re:Goddammit! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      In my view, the no excercise argument really isn't valid, since you get more excercise on the scooter than you would riding in a car.

    27. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to troll be a man about it. Put some karma points on the table, you spineless buffoon.

      AC should be reserved for offtipic and troll trolling only ;-)

    28. Re:Goddammit! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Look at New York, downtown. Practically everyone living there would tell you that traffic is nigh-on impossible. But still, we tolerate it. We love our cars. We cannot give them up, not now, not ever... in fact, we want bigger ones!

      I'd suggest that most New Yorkers have no problem with NYC traffic because most of them do not own or drive cars. So... what do you mean "we", white man? The subway is a vastly superior answer than the segway, for major metropolitan areas.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    29. Re:Goddammit! by nebby · · Score: 1

      Don't let the idiots get you all bent out of shape. There have always been people without vision and who cannot see the forest from the trees. The "intellectual" ones always cause the most damage, unfortunately.

      --
      --
    30. Re:Goddammit! by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Forget the Segway. As long as we are dealing in the pipe dream of alternative transporation, I'd rather put my money here.
      And the best part is nobody would think you are gay for showing up to a party in one of them.

      --
      -R
    31. Re:Goddammit! by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Come on! We are the ones who should be embracing this! Who's gonna convince Kamen to invent the Segway you really want? You know, the chariot version, that gets 5x the distance, and is 1/5 the price? It cannot get here by itself.

      Now, I understand the "early-adopter" model of sales and everything,and that's fine. That tends to work because early adopters still end up with a product they want, and were willing to pay a premium for the utility and the cache of being first. However, you seem to be suggesting that we should support a product that we don't want so that a company can develop a product that we do want. If I'm going to be Dean Kamen's venture capitalist, I'd like to get more for my money than an 40 kg plastic scooter.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    32. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when are you planning on giving up /your/ car?

    33. Re:Goddammit! by g4dget · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Look - the Segway is an attempt to alleviate the total unmitigated disaster that is modern automotive traffic.

      Yes, it just happens to be a really, really lousy attempt.

      There are no quick fixes. Any road infrastructure that is dominated by 1 ton chunks of speeding metal is not going to permit alternative transportation to co-exist; the road and transportation infrastructure itself needs to be fixed. Putting additional chunks of speeding metal onto the sidewalks will only serve to scare away pedestrians even further.

      - "they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger.

      That's why rollerblades and bikes are not permitted on sidewalks in most places.

      I'm sorry for the rant, but frankly the blank-faced pessimism disgusts me. Where is your sense of wonder, Slashdot? Don't be like those fucking lemmings who close the case on new technology before it's even been tried.

      I don't want these overpriced things taking over the sidewalks. It's bad enough that cars have taken over the roads.

      We already know what to do about cars and how to improve transportation: create pedestrian zones, create bicycle lanes, improve public transportation, and improve train service. When there is decent coverage by quality public transportation, people use it. In most places in the US, your choice is a dirty, rickety bus that goes roughly from where you aren't to roughly where you don't want to go. No wonder people stick with the car. And no gadget is going to fix that.

    34. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I think it's overpriced, and has issues. But it's version one. Everyone side-steps that. His plan was sound, sell to vertical markets, get it in front of people and prove it's safe. But the next version - and especially the economies of scale that will allow for cheaper versions - will be better. If they hang in there, that is.

      The 'throw away the first version' mentality of the software industry does not jibe with a manufactured product.

      Also, I don't have a link, but search through the story. Someone makes a comment about how difficult it was for a cruise line to purchase the things. Who takes cruises? People who own factories. So why the reticence to sell the things?

      The thing I'm pissed about is that everyone on this forum, supposedly a forward-thinking forum, wants to knife the baby before it's even grown up just a little. And that's sad.

      What's sad is ignoring reality. Kamen should have waited and sold the second generation Segway first. Kamen should have examined the American lifestyle first (many others have pointed out the senselessness of a vehicle that cannot carry groceries and/or kids).

      Those who say this isn't meant to compete with or be compared to a bicycle are missing the point. If the Segway is meant to 'revolutionize cities' in some mystical fashion, the average, ordinary bicycle does this already at a far, far cheaper cost. Plus it's easy to get saddlebags and/or a child carrier for the thing. Step up a little bit to scooters or motorcycles. You have a machine that probably creates about as much polution as a Segway (my bike gets about 40 mpg, has fuel injection and a catalytic converter) but have a higher top speed, range, and cargo carrying capacity.

      What the posters on this thread have said is "nifty, but impractical". Not everyone can afford to be a starry eyed optimist like Jobs and Bezos.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    35. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You've also ignored the fact that most people do not live in cities. Rather, they live in suburbs. I'm also not sure that you have a family. Even with my small family, I bring home a bunch of stuff from the grocery store: milk, juice, produce, canned goods, diapers (tons of diapers), tp, laundry detergent, etc, etc. No, not every week, but occasionally. I live right around the corner from a couple of stores. I could probably shop every day after work. Why don't I? Time. It's far more efficient to go once a week (with the occasional quick stop for milk) for a big session than to go daily. I'd rather spend the time with the wife and kid than in line at the market.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    36. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Segway is not a bike, it cannot be compared to any self-powered vehicle.

      Bullshit. You cannot compare the redness or an apple to the redness of an orange in a favorable way. But as a piece of fruit or as a snack, the two can be compared. Similarly, as a 'revolutionary transportation device', the Segway can be compared quite easily to just about any powered or unpowered vehicle that I, the parent, and many others have mentioned.

      it is the first of its kind and while it has problems for sure, it should be improved, not scorned.

      Without criticism, how can it improve? If Kamen knew it could be better, why not make it better in the first go round?

      I can't remember from your other postings, but do you have one of these scooters now? If not, why not? If so, how do you address family transportation, trips longer than about 10 miles, etc? The best I can see is that the Segway may be an accessory to much of the population, but again, the bicycle, scooter (like a Riva), motorcycle, or the foot is probably a better value proposition.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    37. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Oh, but you haven't thought of the children and the environment. That thing probably spews out toxin in the form of byproducts of gasoline combustion. You are an evil, evil man.

      Read between the lines of the parent post. He and Kamen are clearly part of the vast left wing conspiracy that wants all of us to live in cities, walk to our factory jobs (for 20 hours per week) and spend the rest of our time killing young children so that we can return the Earth to the animals and Gaea. (Yes, way extremist, but I get the feeling that Kamen and the Segway fans ignore the 'flyover people' a great deal.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    38. Re:Goddammit! by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      One out of three ain't bad.

      - "i can't use my hands".. you can't when you drive either

      Bullshit. You are "supposed" to use both your hands while driving, but you have the ability to use one or a knee.

      That's not an option with the Segway.

      - "i've gotta stand up".. that's part of the point, they take up less room

      If I have to stand up anyhow I may as well walk. While it may be part of the point, it's also the reason that someone doesn't want to drop $5k on one.

      - "they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger.

      Ok, I'll grant you that this is a stupid argument.

      ~D

    39. Re:Goddammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>the Segway is an attempt to alleviate the total unmitigated disaster that is modern automotive traffic.

      I'd prefer a trolly system like we had in the old days. Right now there is just no political push for it, but had the automobile industry not bought up the old trolley lines, we might have an infrastructure to work with. Both require a major change in the way cities are managed. At least one can be used by people without paying 5K.

      San Jose used to have a great trolly system. Now they are trying to sorta build one (a light rail) but it is woefully inadequate.

    40. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Bullshit. You cannot compare the redness or an apple to the redness of an orange in a favorable way. But as a piece of fruit or as a snack, the two can be compared. Similarly, as a 'revolutionary transportation device', the Segway can be compared quite easily to just about any powered or unpowered vehicle that I, the parent, and many others have mentioned.

      Heh. Okay. I can work with that.

      Let's compare.

      Price: Segway is $5000, plus whatever electricity you use to power it (let's say $100/year). Car is anywhere between $1000-$100,000, plus gas ranging from $50/month and going waaay up, plus parking at home and work, plus maintenance (the real killer), plus insurance.

      Capability: Segway cannot work in snow, has a range of 20 miles or so, is not enclosed, has minimal storage. Car can do all of these things better.

      Impact on citizenry (a little broad, bear with me): Segway would probably quadruple in-town traffic, possibly some minor collisions resulting in injury, some infrastructure changes needed (although not much; wheelchair ramps are most places), environment benefits immensely. Cars have huge traffic problems in cities, kill many thousands per year and injure millions, no infrastructure change necessary except to expand to fit yet more cars, which are bigger all the time.

      That's the way I see it. The car costs a hell of a lot more, and you get all sorts of convenience and all sorts of hassle, and possibly death, for that money. Oh, and it screws the environment. And they're loud. Now, I know I am in the minority when I say this, but I think something like a Segway is worth it over the long term. If it's viable for you, that is; its meant for city dwellers (not for commuting surburbanites or rural folk.)

      It's so easy to forget the damage cars do. For whatever reason, I am painfully aware of it. I only owned a car for a year before I decided that I hated the whole idea of cars... and I loved my car, and I love driving. But I couldn't justtify it. I can't remember from your other postings, but do you have one of these scooters now? If not, why not?

      No, I don't own one. I wish I did. I can't justify it yet in my particular circumstances... as my city (Toronto) has a pretty good public transportation system, so I use that. I have that luxury.

      Family trips, or in my case any trip out of the city, I rent a car. That 1-2 days I need it out of a month, makes this very cost effective (usually $90 CDN for the weekend).

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    41. Re:Goddammit! by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1
      but you are a lemming, too, the kind that does one-sided analysis. in the Real World, you might get a job as a marketroid.

    42. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Now, I understand the "early-adopter" model of sales and everything,and that's fine. That tends to work because early adopters still end up with a product they want, and were willing to pay a premium for the utility and the cache of being first. However, you seem to be suggesting that we should support a product that we don't want so that a company can develop a product that we do want. If I'm going to be Dean Kamen's venture capitalist, I'd like to get more for my money than an 40 kg plastic scooter.

      You're right, and I agree completely. I don't mean to suggest that /. readers buy one just because 'its the right thing to do'... more like, I was so alarmed at the number of people who were willing to discount the idea, and the tech, outright, since 'their car is better'. You know, no one wants to feel stupid or evil for buying a car, and I'm not suggesting that they are. I just wanted to goose people a little into opening their eyes at just how brutal the current situation is. Seems like no one will sacrifice anything, however minor, about their cars.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    43. Re:Goddammit! by ek_adam · · Score: 1
      - "they'll kill people on sidewalks".. amazing, this argument. It's a total non-starter. Anyone on rollerblades or a bike is much more of a danger.
      Bicycles aren't allowed on sidewalks either in most places.
    44. Re:Goddammit! by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Oh, but you haven't thought of the children and the environment. That thing probably spews out toxin in the form of byproducts of gasoline combustion. You are an evil, evil man.

      Ah, how right you are. However the electricity required to charge the Segway comes from such wonderful things as combustion, nuclear reactors, and other not-so-environment friendly things. I'm of the school of thought that if dirty work must be done, it should be done yourself. Therefore, I will fly over the Segway zealots in my Skycar, pollute the hell out of the atmosphere with my rotary combustion engine, and look way cool doing it!

      --
      -R
    45. Re:Goddammit! by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      If you could all be so kind as to take a step back.. waaayyy back. Think of cars, particularly in cities. The fatalities. The noise. The pollution. The cost. The traffic. The space they take up. Were a self-respecting geek to examine this system from above, encountering it for the first time, I imagine they would recoil in horror. I can't see it as anything but a giant cluster-fuck.

      Well ok, sorry to deflate your optimism about the Segway but...

      The Segway offers nothing to the problem that has not existed for the last decade. The three wheel scooter operates in the same footprint with similar performance characteristics but has not been widely adopted beyond people with mobility problems. Bicycles have been promoted since the 1970s as a solution but have failed in mass adoption. As a solution the Segway is overpriced, overteched and perhaps more importantly is a technical solution to a cultural intervention.

    46. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      I'd suggest that most New Yorkers have no problem with NYC traffic because most of them do not own or drive cars. So... what do you mean "we", white man? The subway is a vastly superior answer than the segway, for major metropolitan areas.

      Royal "we".

      I take the subway every damn day, and I don't have a segway. In case you haven't noticed, there are not a whole lot of subways in the world.

      Also, why are you calling me "white man"?

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    47. Re:Goddammit! by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, why are you calling me "white man"?

      "Tonto, we're surrounded by Indians!"

      "What do you mean 'we', white man?"

      We seem to be agreeing so vehemently that we've started an argument. I hate it when that happens.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    48. Re:Goddammit! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Also, why are you calling me "white man"? "Tonto, we're surrounded by Indians!" "What do you mean 'we', white man?" We seem to be agreeing so vehemently that we've started an argument. I hate it when that happens.

      Erm, no! I diagree with your agreement of us agreeing!... uh, Beige Man!

      (sorry I missed the reference... it's been a long day defending my screwball position on /.)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    49. Re:Goddammit! by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      In my view, the no excercise argument really isn't valid, since you get more excercise on the scooter than you would riding in a car.

      Only if you can seriously count standing still on a moving platform and leaning forward as exercise. I'd guess one or two jumping jacks would match that level of exertion over the life of at least one Segway battery.

      --Atlantix

    50. Re:Goddammit! by Tsunamio · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm a hippie college student right now so it's not really an issue...ask me again in 10 years

    51. Re:Goddammit! by nugneant · · Score: 1

      Subway systems are still a rarity in the world. Yeah, besides the NY subway system, there's only the T in Boston, the over priced Metrorail in DC, the Baltimore subway, the Atlanta, Jacksonville, Cleveland, and Miami systems, BART in San Francisco and LA (mostly / entirely above ground, true, but the only reason there aren't more underground lines is the earthquake factor), and systems in St. Louis, Philadelphia, and oh yeah, that loop in Chicago. Oh, and I think London has a subway of some sort. Whoops, can't forget our neighbors to the north -Toronto had a subway, last time I checked. Ditto Montreal. Tokyo? Barcelona? Brussels? Fuck man, even Uzbekistan has a goddamn subway these days. Hey, wait a minute. I think you may be full of shit and talking out your ass!

    52. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Ah, how right you are. However the electricity required to charge the Segway comes from such wonderful things as combustion, nuclear reactors, and other not-so-environment friendly things.

      How many times do we have to go over this? The charger in the Segway ONLY accepts electricity from solar power (from fields that don't disrupt deserts and that don't have carcinogens as a byproduct of panel manufacture) and wind farms (that don't disrupt migratory patterns or cause visual blight).

      Oh, and burned bong resin powered generators. Said res only coming from users of medical marijuana.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    53. Re:Goddammit! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I never said that the Segway wasn't necessarily better than a car, particularly due to pollution, crowding, etc. I asked how it compares to a bicycle, moped, etc.

      And, FWIW, the one benefit of city living for me would be public transit. It's a great idea, but not where I live.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    54. Re:Goddammit! by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      Leave the lemmings out of this - we think it's a stupid idea too (because of the price).

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  87. The segway is boring! by eaddict · · Score: 1

    I've stated it before and I will again - it is boring! I got to use one on my Disney cruise. I would rather walk or ride a bike. They are dangerous as well. If I wanted to stand all day I'd work a counter job. The segway takes away ANY activity that a person might get on thier job. I would rather pay $500 for a gas powered scooter than $5k for a moving floor.

    --
    "If you are on fire you can just stop, drop, and roll. If you fall into Lava you are just dead." - my 5yr old daughter
  88. Mac 128? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "If they don't come up with a Stirling engine or a killer fuel cell, this thing will go the way of the 128K Mac," says Saffo

    Kamen could only dream that the current Segway would be like the Mac 128. After all, it's the machine that has now led to a multi billion dollar company on machines that are descended from it. If 12 years from now 7% of his market were riding iSegways and he had billions of cash in the bank, he'd be a happy man.

    Perhaps a better comparison is in order, say something like "Betamax".

    1. Re:Mac 128? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kamen could only dream that the current Segway would be like the Mac 128.

      That would be the projected 20,000 unit a month demand VS 512/1218 actual sales for the 128/512k macs in one month?

      it's the machine that has now led to a multi billion dollar company

      Apple made its money on the Apple ][, in case you forgot where the backbone was.

      But please, feel free to be delusional, M'kay?

  89. Mileage. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    See, the Hummer H2 gets 10/12 mpg. That's not a lot. That's shitty mileage. 22 mpg is not shitty, it's rather middlin'.

    I drive a Ford Escort wagon; I get about 27 mpg. It's not a Honda Civic---I'm a very tall and lanky fellow---but it's a responsible kind of car to drive; I can haul a lot of stuff in it too. Everyone remember when families could get away with station wagons? Then they needed minivans and now SUVs. What's changed? Did everyone adopt sixteen new kids?

    (Well, there's also (a) the fact that I couldn't afford a Hummer H2, and (b) I couldn't afford to put gas in one if I had it.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Mileage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Saturn SW2 and a Honda Odyssey.

      The Honda Odyssey is awesome. I guess I like not having to lift my kids to shoulder-height to put them in their car seats, the low level in the back for putting large stuff in, and almost being able to stand in it if need be.

      The "road view" is a crock. If everyone is driving around in a Ford Excursion, what then, driving a Kenworth SUV conversion?

    2. Re:Mileage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The "road view" is not a crock, because everyone isn't driving around in Ford Excursions.

      Tool.

  90. Denial Mode by CallistoLion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The battery runs out after two hours, and to change it: "You pull out eight bolts, put in two new batteries, tighten up the eight bolts, and continue on your route."

    At 80 pounds how do you get it out of your car's trunk? "It's easy," Smith chirps. "I grab one side and get a friend to lift the other."

    Tell those engineers to put away the happy pills.

    1. Re:Denial Mode by Suidae · · Score: 1

      The most pathetic part of this is that most americans are incapable of lifting 80 pounds.

  91. Over hyped from the start by nexusone · · Score: 1

    I remember when word first started out about "it", and "it" was it's name.
    Anything that was so revolutionary, would need to be hype and clouded in so much mystry.

    I knew from the start, all the hype was to try and get people interested as to want to buy it.

    Anything that has to be first over hyped to sell is doomed.

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  92. I beg to differ... by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1


    http://www.stirlingenergy.com/

    Stirling engines aren't used for automotive purposes, not because they are slow or can't generate power. If they are designed right, they can throw out high revs and plenty of power.

    The problem is they are not very good where the load on the engine will be rapidly varying. They don't accelerate quickly. Like severe turbo lag.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:I beg to differ... by NorthDude · · Score: 1

      But, could they be used in some way as the powerplant for an hybrid vehicle? The "generator" do not have to accelerate quickly, just run consistently. But then, I'm not an engineer anyway...

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    2. Re:I beg to differ... by wzm · · Score: 1

      They have been. Supposedly the 1979 AMC Spirit was made into a Stirling engine based vehicle at one point, although I've never seen one.

    3. Re:I beg to differ... by luzrek · · Score: 1
      Umm... There is another problem with a stirling engine. You have to be able to rapidly change the temperatures of the gasses. This is possible aboard a boat because you can have a heat source (like a nuclear reactor) and a big-a** heat sink (the ocean). If you are trying to put one of these in a land based vehicle you don't really have any way to discipate the heat quickly (air has a low specific heat when compaired with water).

      I also question the applicability of revs since the best way to build one is for linear motion (which you could then convert into circular motions).

      The efficiency of the Stirling cycle is also highly dependant on the lowest temperature achieved. It is very difficult to get very cold temperatures (LN2 isn no where near cold enough for the Stirling cycle to reach maximum efficiency, you need absolute zero). If you could really build a 80% efficient Stirling engine it would be worth while to make a fancy transmition to deal with rapidly varying load. Since internal combustion engines are at best 15% efficient in their energy use.

      Anyway, back to the matter at hand, cruddy sales for the Segway. I don't see the market for it. If you live outside of the urban centers it doesn't have enough range or speed. If you live in the Urban centers or need to commute to them public transit (light rail and busses) are much more cost efficient and in most cases faster than the Segway. In the few cases when you need to get around an Urban center faster than walking + public transit bicycles are probably faster (and definitely cheaper). That said, the Segway would be pretty fun for some sort of a modified version of polo.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    4. Re:I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General motors was using one in their HEV until they decided to move to fuel cells. The move to fuel cells allow them to suck off the tit of the government.

  93. a tenth the price ... by Kosi · · Score: 1

    If they really thought this to be the bike of the future, the should have priced it in this class. For the price of a Segway I can buy a decent motorbike or used car!

    Kosi

  94. Wrong market by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    Ruggedise them add a tow-bar, optional trailer and market them to airports, train stations and the like for commuters to haul their bags around.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  95. History. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    From the howstuffworks thingy...

    Invented by Robert Stirling in 1816...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  96. Oh that's right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough with these "silly" inventions. Why would anyone ever want a television? Radio is good enough. Moving pictures will NEVER catch on.

    And while we're at it, let's mock those idiots up on the hill trying to make that flying machine. Why would man want to fly, anyway? What a stupid idea. They should just stick to their bike shop since a bike can travel further anyways.

    1. Re:Oh that's right... by MSBob · · Score: 1
      Just because someone claims they 'invented' stuff it doesn't mean they did. Television was an improved form of communications over radio. The Segway is a step down from a car or even a motor bike in every way: travel comfort, distance covered, speed of commuting and even affordability! Just because it employs a computer doesn't mean it is an improved vehicle. In my eyes (an seemingly in most people's) it is inferior to a car in every single way.

      A real breakthrough will come when we use fuel cells in lieu of fossil fuels to power cars. Now that will be a real change but it won't come until the hegemony of big oil corps is undermined.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    2. Re:Oh that's right... by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we already have plenty of things with wheels that can move around on the ground. And most of them are far more practical than the Segway.

  97. Segway's Business Plan by PepperedApple · · Score: 1

    Segway actually has a great business plan:

    He hired scores of lobbyists, who spent much of last year trying to persuade state legislatures to rewrite their laws to permit his scooter to operate on city sidewalks.

    His lobbying created a barrier to entry, meaning that anyone who wants to copy his idea will have to go through the same procedure, which will take about a year. Timing is everything. Even if the current version of the Segway flops, they have first dibs on the next model.

  98. Segway will live by gspr · · Score: 1

    All they need is to change their way of doing business. By adopting the microsoft business model, they'll conquer the market! 1) Buy all competing solutions. 2) Now you have a helluva loan to pay back, time to get some customers: "Fund" certain politicians' campains, and in return have them pass a law making it legal for hospitals to force people giving birth in the hospital to buy a Segway in order to take their baby home. 3) Time to expand into the market where they don't belong. Convince everybody that a Segway really is a lot easier to use than a car, and therefore much better. 4) Say that air travel is ruining the economy, and that Segway is the answer. 5) All who travel by train are criminals. 6) Market domination is just about achieved... time to raise the price.

  99. I Rode one.... by dfenstrate · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A guy who works in my building has one that he rides around occasionally (his wife works for Segway), and he let me try it out.
    It's pretty fun to ride around, actually, very simple to use. I got the hang of it in about 5 minutes with coaching, and was doing loops around the third floor atrium of the building (Morse Hall at the University of New Hampshire) shortly thereafter.

    If I had $5,000 to spend on a toy, I'd do it in a second.
    That being said, I'd like to repeat the sentiments of previous posters: In the final equation, it has few advantages over a bike, and several disadvantages, and If I needed a way to get around without a car, I'd buy a bike first. Bikes go faster, even a mild lardass like myself can outride the segway's ~15 mile charge, and you can attach all kinds of trailers and racks to a bike if you want to haul stuff. Plus, there's the health benefits to providing the motive energy to moving your butt around.

    Bikes are much larger, but much lighter. It's a bit easier to keep your clothes clean & pressed while riding a segway, so it could be a bicycle substitute for the suit type- as long as they don't mind looking like dorks.

    This thing could be fairly useful for door to door postal service and similar applications.

    Most people here probably know that the Segway is based on the technology developed for the Ibot 3000 , a balancing, standing wheelchair- truly an innovation for the disabled, and I'm sure it will sell very well.

    The Segway, then, might be a good thing for the elderly, those still healthy enough to stand at any rate, to help them get around. But if they're fit enough to ride on this, maybe they should be riding a bike too...

    Anyway, my conclusion: Fun, but a waste of money for anything outside of a few specific demographics and jobs.
    Get a bike. You'll live longer.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:I Rode one.... by Timmeh · · Score: 1
      OK so this is like two days old or something and absolutely no one will read this but it will not be very useful for postman-types at all. My parents work for the USPS, and from what I've heard none of the mail carriers want Segways at all.
      1. You can't sort mail as you walk up to the house. Mail carriers get the mail they need to deilver in somewhat pre-sorted bundles, they then have to group the mail according to house and you can't do this if your hands are on a Segway. So you end up riding up to the mailbox, stopping, sorting the mail, putting it in then going on your way. Compared to sorting as you walk, with no stopping.
      2. You get damn cold if you spend your entire mail route standing still on a segway. With walking you warm yourself due to the exercise youre getting hauling mail around.
      3. Most mailmen cross people's yards to save time if there are no fences, on a Segway it's pretty hard to cross the lawn I'm sure, or at least you're going to run down the battery dealing with the less than smooth terrain.
      4. And finally, the charge doesn't last long enough to finish a route, so you need to take out eight bolts or something, replace batteries in your truck, and then replace the eight bolts, come on! I want my mail now.
      5. Add all this up and you end up delivering the mail in about the same time, and maybe saving yourself some back pain. Most of the mail carriers are pretty strong after carrying huge sacks of mail for a number of years, and simply don't have that much of a problem with lugging them around anymore.
      </rant>

      I know this has will most likely never be seen, but seriously, everyone thinks this will be good for the Post Office but the post office. Just clearing some things up.

  100. Surprised (sort of) by hawkfish · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean someone came up with a way for the American population to get even fatter and it isn't selling?

    --
    You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    1. Re:Surprised (sort of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you start walking or riding a bike EVERYWHERE YOU GO, STFU.

  101. Maybe he should rename if SEGWAY.COM? by MobileDude · · Score: 1

    While the Segaway is an interesting use of technology, I had to laugh at the hype once we saw "it".

    Revolutionary? Hardly. In fact, the majority of the U.S. has no use for it. Think about it - the typical usage profile is short distance with no storage. Doesn't sound like I want to head to the grocery store 5 miles away to carry a week's worth of bacon.

    Campus use? Break out all the old "fat chicks on mopeds" for an update.

    Corporate use? Talk about the exec perk. I'm sure the minions will love having a boss that can't even walk between meetings.

    Police use? Not likely. In fact, isn't San Fran banning these things for use by anyone?

    I'll wait a couple of years before I buy my Segway collectible on eBay.....

    --
    10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
  102. Unfortunately... by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dean Kamen designed some incredibly sophisticated electronics and computer controls that do the job of a third wheel.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  103. Econ 101 by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    Segway = $3000
    Skateboard - $40-$60

    Solution - sue the skateboard companies!

  104. Embrace the mayhem by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

    They mention in the article that they don't want to be associated with the mayhem of "razor" scooters. They should embrace the mayhem, create a Segway based event in the friggin' X-Games. Get some Sk8ter Boi to fly around in one with more powerful motors and baggy pants.

    --
    C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
  105. Dork Factor by simetra · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps they realized that all the goo-goo gaa-gaa that they generated at launch still doesn't overcome the dork factor; that people riding these look like dorks who are trying to hold in a massive bowel movement, while at the same time, thinking "Look at me! Look at me!"

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  106. well who didn't see this coming by comandertracer · · Score: 1

    An object sold that makes it easy to get around but makes americans stand is a bad Idea, the whole reason the car sell so well. I think the biggest turn off for these is that you need training to use higher speeds with the segway and most people spent enough on the machine itself. ok now I saw the end of segway when they came on screensavers with it almost a year ago http://www.techtv.com/screensavers/opinion/story/0 ,24330,3396726,00.html now if screensavers leo thinks it is lame then well by god it went out a while ago.

  107. Sour Grapes by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've been through many of these posts, and they all seem to revel in the difficulty of the Segway company. Geez. By the reactions, you'd think a Segway had sex with your mom and then said, "I just wanna be friends..."

    I think that the 'angry' responses are from people who would buy one if they could easily afford one - much like linux users who put down macs, while secretly drooling over one.

    Did it deserve the huge media hype? Does American Idol? Probably not. Will it make you fat? No. Will cities tear out roads to accomadate it? No. Was it overhyped? Yes. Is there any reason to kick it when its down? No.

    The Segway seems to be a good product that is trying to fill a niche. Since it *is* overpriced, and fighting a cultural battle (SUVs driven to get the mail at the end of the driveway), it won't do well. I think the idea is ahead of its time. Change the way cities are built? Maybe. But not now.

    Just remember, the Segway didn't have sex with your mom. I did.

    1. Re:Sour Grapes by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Uh no. Its not jealousy or envy. This damn thing sucks and all the hype it got was annoying thats why people are glad the company that made it is in trouble now.

      Here is a link to a list of reasons why this thing sucks and none of them have anything to do with envy:
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=54394&c id=5334 952

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Sour Grapes by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      Why no anger at the media outlets who overhype crap all the time? Sure, you bought into it and then found out it wasn't an anti-grav belt. Why blame Segway? Unless of course they paid for all that media attention....

    3. Re:Sour Grapes by kakos · · Score: 1

      It has to do with the fact that this thing was hyped so much and a LOT of people were excited to see what it was. I know I was. I believed all the hype that it would change the way cities are designed and such. I figured DK had come up with the holy grail of technology. IT was the biggest thing in the news for qutie a while.

      And then it comes out. It's a horrific looking scooter that has terrible range, horrible price tag, doesn't move fast enough, etc etc. I just looked at it and was like "Wha?" It wouldn't change anything. It probably wouldn't even sell well. It was disappointment of the most extreme variety. That is why I'm bitter. They got my hopes up and released a pathetic little scooter.

    4. Re:Sour Grapes by bhdaly · · Score: 1

      It is not sour grapes. It is reaction to a lot of over hype for an inferior product. Several unspoken secrets that are in the technical specs on their site are that the range of a full charge is at best 15 miles and estimated at 5 miles on rugged/hilly terrain. Secondly, and most importantly, the life of the batteries is only 300 cycles! Do the math: at best you get 4500 miles and at less than optimal you get 1500 miles before you have to replace the batteries. Real world experience will inevitably be less.

      Compare this $4000 dollar human transporter with a $1000 moped. A moped has a range of 50-150 miles on a tank, can go 20-55 depending on whether the restrictor is left in and lasts as long as a car. A moped is low tech, so no costly repairs, a moped can be pushed or pedaled on failure, a moped can go in car traffic and bicycle traffic. A moped was not overhyped as a revolutionizing mode of transportation, but is a better deal in all respects.

    5. Re:Sour Grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The battery life is a joke. And they are NiCad and won't last long..

      As for afford, I happily purchase a new Z06 Corvette every year for $50K. But a $5000 scooter? Get real.

    6. Re:Sour Grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Segway is the one that over-hyped it. They played the media like a fiddle. They didn't have to do that, they did. It's their fault.

    7. Re:Sour Grapes by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

      the segway is good technology, not a good product. and it's not trying to fill any niche - it's trying to replace the car outright! you're correct, it is fighting a cultural battle against men and their big, gas-guzzling SUV's, but honestly, it doesn't have much firepower.

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    8. Re:Sour Grapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just remember, the Segway didn't have sex with your mom. I did.
      Dad, quit trying to be "cool".
  108. My old Gran has one ... by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    My nan actually has one Sir Clives wheel chair assist motors, very good too, just bolted onto her existing wheel chair and zoom of she goes :-) All we've got to do now is instill in her the need to recharge it. Mark

  109. Can it run linux yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Not for personal travel but for internal movement of heavier products. Loading/unloading large loads etc...
    Imagine a walmart with 3 people running the whole show. An online ordering system and a delivery service. If you want to make it fun, use capacitors, a small battery and a mircowave charging system--theft prevention, can also include a charging system dependency. Automates the entire warehouse at low cost and minimal floorspace.

    A boon and/or replaceable (robotic/tools) arms. More versatile factories, makes cars on day, vcr's the next.

    Wheelchairs that climb stairs without endangering the occupant or bystanders. Soft tires that can run over a childs foot without harm, and collision inhibit system (short range motion detectors and or thermal for safety).

    Can it run linux yet? Can I hit a button on my remote, or beer shortcut key and have one in 20 seconds or so. Can it go shopping at the local grocery store for elderly (excluding produce and meats I'm picky).

    Who owns the patent to the giro?

  110. Where did this poor guy go wrong? by dmorin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Dean Kamen did not suddenly appear out of nowhere with the Segway. He's been around for years inventing some amazing things that have helped mankind. He's damned near a modern Thomas Edison (go look at some of his patents for real inventions, not just algorithms like us software geeks have to worry about). But for the most part his press was substantially limited. If you didn't have a medical problem that required one of his devices, or a kid that was part of his FIRST competition, odds are you never heard of him.

    I still wonder, what changed? What caused him to suddenly try to take over the world like this? I prefer to think that it was just the pressure of the dotcom boom that got to him. Too many venture capitalists whispering in his ear that he was missing out on the big picture. It's a shame, really. If this thing came out with about a hundredth of the fan fare, then he'd probably be doing fine, and none of us would be looking at him like a crackpot -- and a few years from now we'd all have one. But this nonsense about hiring thousands of lobbyists and such was really pretty ridiculous. He knows full well that "good for you" technology cannot be shoved down the public's throats. I just don't understand what he was thinking.

  111. "everyone's favorite Human Transporter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    women?

  112. What about bicycles? by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    If you want to save money and lose weigth, why not use a bicycle? Not an option in the US? Not that I don't have sympathies for the segway, it sure looks funny.

  113. Slashdot: The Junior High of the internet by Matey-O · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's a guy that made a cool hack. It's something that has never been done before - a unique view at a problem that could a) change the way a great many people move about or b) fall flat on it's face.

    Guess which future the people of Slashdot take the most pleasure in. (Hint: {nelson} HA! HA! {/nelson})

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Slashdot: The Junior High of the internet by Life2Short · · Score: 1

      Agreed, why pile on the guy? He had a vision and ran with it. It's nothing to gloat over if he falls on hard times. I worked for an electrical contractor that helped overhaul his building (an old 19th century textile mill) in Manchester NH in the early '80s. Dean Kamen is a gentleman and a scholar, and he was polite to everyone, even lowly working class scruffs such as myself. When we worked at some other places (DEC comes to mind) the tech people looked at us like we were lepers. Trivia: His dad was a comic book artist back in the day. He did the movie poster for CreepShow and I think CreepShow II. You can see his signature in the corner. Dean Kamen had a big copy of it framed in his lab. His folks were (deservedly) very proud of him. He's a nice guy, and I wish him the best of luck in the future.

  114. The Segway - what 'it' is. by mr · · Score: 1

    The Segway is a standing wheelchair.

    Perfect for people who have 'bad knees' - the knees can take a load, but don't fair well with the bending.

    If you say 'this is a medical device' you enter a strange, parallel world where every move you make requires paperwork. But without the medical tag, its hard to get insurance to pay.

    Thus, the Segway is being sold the way its being sold w/o the company pointing to the medical needs.

    The 'novelity' of the Segway is the self-balancing feature, but "The market" does not feel $5000 is worth it. Kamen and Company need to examine what price point makes them money on EACH unit w/o reguard to past expenditures and price them there if they want to stay in business at this time. The sunk costs of R/D are sunk, and the product isn't moving.

    --
    If it was said on slashdot, it MUST be true!
  115. Cars faced similar problems but offered advantages by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your analogy is utterly flawed. The difference between then and now is that the automobile was MUCH better while the Segway is, at best, a little better, but overall, actually much worse.

    Because the automobile offered so many advantages over walking and the horse and buggy, people were willing to pay the price of building and rebuilding roads to suit the new vehicle. But, who is willing to rebuild our cities to use a Segway? Because of weather our cities would have to be domed. Are you willing to pay for that?

    If not, are businesses willing to provide showers and changing rooms for employees who drive in on Segways? No way. Currently their employees get to work via cars, busses and trains. Why should businesses be compelled to spend MORE money so employees could get there via Segways?! There is no advantage to change.

    Similarly, there is no advantage to change our streets, because we are currently getting where we need to be without changing them.

    And right now I can go shopping and actually have room in my car to bring home enough groceries for a family of 4. There is no advantage for me to suddenly change my shopping practices and go every day, getting only a few things at a time. Wasting MORE time at the supermarket is certainly not an advantage in my book!

    I could go on and on, but it's a simple fact that the automobile offered huge advantages that the horse and buggy did not. That is why we changed our society to suit the automobile. We will never do that for the Segway because doing so would mostly offer disadvantages, not advantages.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  116. surely it's not all that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some country's that werent bombed to bits during WW2 and had governmnets who wernt so short sighted in the golden decades after WW2 still have old city centers. with realy tight streets that dont sute car needs.
    basicaly tourist atracting mazes.

    a lot of them are banning "big" motorised vehicles
    segway could be a solution there.
    especialy in the more southern countries that have more or less good weather...

    i mentioned them before tourists, isnt there a tour operator that is intrested in those things.
    imagine raceing after your guide on your segway
    [remeber your a tourist, you look silly no matter what you do!]
    a bicyckle doesnt lend it self to that task if your a middel aged overweight desk worker...

    i'm sure there is a market for the segway they simply havent looked in the right place

  117. Favourite Human Transporter?!? by Juju · · Score: 1

    There is no way I would prefer to use a Segway over my bike!!!
    Compare the price, the weight or health benefit of a Segway over a bike...
    Why would people spend so much money on something as useless as a Segway.

    Well apparently people seem to think Segway is pointless too so I am starting to think that there is still some future for the human race.

    --
    Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
  118. Anyone every hear of a bike?? by Monty67 · · Score: 1

    At 5grand you could almost afford to get what Lance rides at the TdF. It has no need for fuel cells, helps to improve congestion as well as personal health, and given the right person and terrain can outrun the Segway. Or you go the MTb route can cover stuff Segway can only dream of; not to mention that Segways don't jump. ;-) But mostly importantly, you already know how to use it.

  119. Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Fatalities suck, but death is something we'll never eliminate. We'll put up with a certain amount to have our precious cars.

    Pollution is being handled with hybrids and fuel-cell developments. The cars 50 years from now won't be polluters at all.

    Noise? You get used to it. Deal.

    Cost? Cost of what? Bottled water costs more than gas and you can get cheap ass used cars off of ebay. What cost?

    Traffic? Yeah it sucks. It can be managed though. Besides that gives you more time to sit in your wonderful car and read, listen to the radio, surf the web...etc (I'm talking during gridlock conditions here not just when your waiting for a neighborhood streetlight to turn green). Besides, take a look at my hometown's Big Dig project in Boston. We put our entire central artery undergrown. Despite the MASSIVE and OBSCENE budget and time overruns, hundreds of cities around the country are interested in doing the same thing.

    The space they take up? Do you know how large the US is in terms of space? We're the 4th largest country on the planet. We're not running out of room anytime soon. That being said, if cities are to be redesigned for any reason it surely won't be to accomdate Segways but to accomdate Hummers instead.

    Despite the hate, SUV sales contine to grow, grow grow, grow!

    So in conclusion, the Great American Love Affair with the Car is one of those very few immortal relationships. It would be best to try to make our most beloved form of travel better than to resort to undignifying and demeaning forms of travel such as tiny useless ultra-expensive scooters.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Fatalities suck, but death is something we'll never eliminate. We'll put up with a certain amount to have our precious cars.

      Say what you mean, dude. Like this:

      For the six year period from 1993 to 1998, an average of 1,640 people in New York were killed annually as a result of motor vehicle crashes. During this same period, an average of 286,000 New Yorkers annually were injured in traffic crashes. Data for New York City indicates that 26.7 percent of these total statewide annual traffic fatalities, and 43 percent of total statewide crash injuries occurred within city limits.

      This can be avoided. We should try, at least.

      Pollution is being handled with hybrids and fuel-cell developments. The cars 50 years from now won't be polluters at all.

      Pollution could be stopped today. The Segway obviously doesn't pollute. 50 years? That's confortably out of your frame of reference, isn't it? "I won't worry, they'll have it solved in 50 years." Ridiculous. Take some responsibility. We all need to.

      Noise? You get used to it. Deal.

      Why should I? It doesn't have to be this way. Why are you so against fixing the problems with the current situation? Or do you really believe that it cannot be improved, that all this is a necessary evil?

      Cost? Cost of what? Bottled water costs more than gas and you can get cheap ass used cars off of ebay. What cost?

      You have got to be kidding. I can't believe you even typed that. I'm not going to get into the cost of running a car in a city. I will quickly mention that your average condo parking spot - a square of concrete - in Toronto is $CDN 30,000.

      Traffic? Yeah it sucks.

      It doesn't just suck, it's totally insane. Imagine the productivity lost with everyone spenind 2+hours a day in their car.

      The space they take up? Do you know how large the US is in terms of space?

      The Segway is meant to alleviate the most obvious traffic problem, that of congested cities. It clearly can't cross great distances. There is no alternative to the car for this right now.

      Despite the hate, SUV sales contine to grow, grow grow, grow!

      To my grow, grow, growing despair.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    2. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      The Segway obviously doesn't pollute

      Yes it does. It's just that the pollution is moved. That energy doesn't come free you know - you have to charge the Segway, and that power has to come from a power plant, which does pollute.

      Of course, I'd guess that cleaning up a few thousand stationary power plants is a helluva lot easier than cleaning up a few hundred million mobile vehicles, but saying that it doesn't pollute is ignorance.

      I don't see noise as an issue either - modern hybrid cars make little noise (only when their engines are actually on). Electric cars don't make significantly more noise than a Segway. I suspect fuel cell cars are a little noiser than a hybrid, but considerably quieter than gas/diesel. It's not a solved issue yet, but it's getting there.

      It doesn't just suck, it's totally insane. Imagine the productivity lost with everyone spenind 2+hours a day in their car

      Yeah, so instead people will spend 4+ hours a day on their Segway. Because you didn't change anything - even if they can go top speed on the Segway then you're limited to ~12 mph. If your commute is 25 miles (which is not at all unusual in most major metro areas) then it's going to take you two hours at top speed, uninterrupted, on a Segway. A more realistic figure would be 2.5 hours. And, of course, the Segway doesn't even have enough range to do a 25 mile commute.

      And this is an issue the Segway doesn't solve... and while it wasn't meant to address it, the mere fact that it doesn't is part of what doomed it to failure. It's simply not a viable method of transport for most people.

      Heck, it's not viable for my family - I have a 4 mile commute that takes 15 minutes. My wife has a 10 mile commute that takes 45-60 minutes. With a Segway the time spent would remain about the same (under perfect circumstances), but now I'm screwed if it rains (~150 days/year), when it's hot and muggy (~6 months), when it's godawful cold (~1 month), etc. And cargo? What cargo? What about running errands (which I do during lunch 2-3 times/week)? Picking up groceries on the way home? Just about anything else?

      Give it a chance you say? Nope... it's a non-viable solution. I'm perfectly willing to buy viable solutions, and I'll even pay a small premium for a hybrid or similar vehicle, but I'm not going to pay a premium for something that just doesn't solve the problem.

    3. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by btellier · · Score: 1

      Pollution could be stopped today. The Segway obviously doesn't pollute.

      Where do you think the electricity comes from to charge it? Lightning?

    4. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      There is an upper limit to productivity. People need slack time in their lives. I've actually read articles which stated that folks looked forward to their time stuck in traffic as a period in which they could unwind and relax and think about things that otherwise don't have time to do so during the workday.

      I'm 22. In 50 years I'll be 72. I'll still be here to feel the affects. I AM taking responsibility.

      Not everyone needs their own deeded parking spot. I live in Boston, one of the worst cities for parking in the country and you can still park your car most of the time without any problems. I will admit I left out car insurance. My mistake. Still, you take a cheapo $1000 car off of ebay, pay $800 a year in insurance and add your gas bill which will vary due to your particular usage. How is this suppossed to be costly again?

      Noise, more noise comes from idiots blasting their car stereo's than from the cars themselves. Unless your house is right next to a freeway then you really don't have much to complain about.

      NYC is a city of 8 million people. Out of that 1640 die from car accidents during a six year period. That means every year only 273 people are killed due to our use of automobiles. I find that to be a more than an acceptable level of death. If you are talking about the entire state of NY then its even a more acceptable level of death.

      Now lets factor in the pollution issue. Due to our increasingly tough emissions laws the US puts out less and less pollution each year. The hole in the ozone layer is already shrinking. Why does 50 years seem like such a bad thing? You cannot change the world overnight.

      Face it, until transporters are invented the car is here to stay.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Pollution could be stopped today. The Segway obviously doesn't pollute. 50 years? That's confortably out of your frame of reference, isn't it? "I won't worry, they'll have it solved in 50 years." Ridiculous. Take some responsibility. We all need to.

      Segway adds to pollution too (and entropy). Either it's clean nuclear power that the unwashed masses are scared of, hydro-electric/wind power/solar power, or burning fossil fuels, but something needs to generate power for the Segway's batteries.

      The electricity required for Segway will generate pollution. Yes, it may not be created by Segway, but it will be created for Segway. And what about manufacturing? How many pollutants are generated during the manufacture of Segway's electronics? What about during the disposal of it's old batteries?

      Pollution cannot be stopped today. But it can be managed today. Whether it's cars, factories, cows burping, etc is not important. What is important is how we control the output, minimize it as best we can, clean up what we can, and make it as expensive as possible for those who are "over-polluting." When people have an incentive to manage their pollution, they will.

    6. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      The Segway obviously doesn't pollute...

      Yes it does. It's just that the pollution is moved. That energy doesn't come free you know - you have to charge the Segway, and that power has to come from a power plant, which does pollute.

      Moot. The Segway itself does not pollute; whether you get your energy from a 'green' source or not is beside the point. In fact, I could conceivably get green energy for the Segway; the car leaves you very, very few options.

      I don't see noise as an issue either - modern hybrid cars make little noise (only when their engines are actually on).

      That's great. I hope we get more. Right now, it's noisy downtown.

      Yeah, so instead people will spend 4+ hours a day on their Segway. Because you didn't change anything - even if they can go top speed on the Segway then you're limited to ~12 mph. If your commute is 25 miles (which is not at all unusual in most major metro areas) then it's going to take you two hours at top speed, uninterrupted, on a Segway. A more realistic figure would be 2.5 hours. And, of course, the Segway doesn't even have enough range to do a 25 mile commute.

      That is a good point (the time spent). Of course, forgetting productivity and all that for a sec, those hours are not spent polluting the environment, every day.

      If your commute is 25 miles the Segway is not for you.

      Heck, it's not viable for my family - I have a 4 mile commute that takes 15 minutes. My wife has a 10 mile commute that takes 45-60 minutes. With a Segway the time spent would remain about the same (under perfect circumstances), but now I'm screwed if it rains (~150 days/year), when it's hot and muggy (~6 months), when it's godawful cold (~1 month), etc. And cargo? What cargo? What about running errands (which I do during lunch 2-3 times/week)? Picking up groceries on the way home? Just about anything else?

      Whew! ok...
      Why are you screwed if it rains? Seriously? It does operate in rain. I also operate in rain on my own legs. Hot? I don't see that as a problem either. Snow might be a problem if there's a lot, but they even have snow tires for the thing. Cargo sucks compared to a car, it's true. I have no answer for this; I think it's a small price for all the other benefits. (I generally get things delivered, including my groceries. I live in a big city.)

      I rent cars for extended trips out of the city, or what have you. Doing this once a month costs me $90 CDN.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    7. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      There is an upper limit to productivity. People need slack time in their lives. I've actually read articles which stated that folks looked forward to their time stuck in traffic as a period in which they could unwind and relax and think about things that otherwise don't have time to do so during the workday.

      Wouldn't it be great though, if you could choose how to spend that slack time, rather than be stuck in your car? It's a good point you have, but it doesn't really make for a good selling point for cars... 'think of all that reading you can do in traffic!'

      Still, you take a cheapo $1000 car off of ebay, pay $800 a year in insurance and add your gas bill which will vary due to your particular usage. How is this suppossed to be costly again?

      It doesn't even compare.

      Segway = $5000 + approx. $100/year for juice

      Car = $1000 + approx. $50/month gas, $150/month parking, $whatever insurance, $whatever maintenance (more since you bought a cheapo).

      To my mind, that means the car and the Segway break even after 1.5 years or so. The car loses badly every year thereafter. The car offers you much more capability, but it's much more expensive, and much more dangerous. That's my opinion. (Also, I hated it when I had my car, and a repair bill came out of nowhere. The Segway is a lot less likely to break down, less moving parts.)

      Noise, more noise comes from idiots blasting their car stereo's than from the cars themselves.

      I see that as a plus for Segways, as I would probably wear my iPod. :)

      NYC is a city of 8 million people. Out of that 1640 die from car accidents during a six year period. That means every year only 273 people are killed due to our use of automobiles. I find that to be a more than an acceptable level of death. If you are talking about the entire state of NY then its even a more acceptable level of death.

      Dude, I find 'acceptable level of death' to be a totally unacceptable comment, but whatever. Cars are deadly, Segways are not.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    8. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      How useful is something people can only use in most of the country for a few days a year? No matter where you live in the US at some point its going to rain. In other places it will snow. THen there's hot and cold. How long do you think people will want to ride these things while they are freezing or sweating their asses off?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    9. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      Where do you think the electricity comes from to charge it?


      In my case, it would come from wind power. Hence, it would be non-polluting. Of course this isn't an option for everyone, but as more and more non-polluting energy plants are made, electric devices such as the Segway become cleaner and cleaner. The same isn't true automobiles (yes, your new car may be less polluting than the old one you got rid of, but any given car will never improve)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    10. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      this is a pretty common statement. i live in seattle, it rains here a lot. 90% of my trips are now with the segway ht, that said-- i still walk, run, bike, car pool and take public transit too. it's all about choices, the segway ht isn't for everyone, and it's not for every climate and it's not for all year in some areas. the point is-- less total car trips.

      i'm not sure where you live where there are only a "few days" of weather where one could go outside.

    11. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Segway obviously doesn't pollute.

      Where do you get the electricity from?

    12. Re:Segways BOO, Cars YAY! by jbrandon · · Score: 1

      Car = $1000 + approx. $50/month gas, $150/month parking, $whatever insurance, $whatever maintenance

      What? The parent of this comment said he didn't pay for parking. Plus, $50 of gas is almost 13 miles a day, which is near the limits of an HT.

      Then I factor in all the time and hassle I spend trying to figure out public transportation for days when there's precip, or I have to go to the grocery store, and it just doesn't seem worth it.

  120. Business Plan by gimple · · Score: 1

    1) Invent cool new device.
    2) Charge more money than people will pay, so noone buys one.
    3) Profit!

    1. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was so fucking lame. Don't quit your day job because you are not a comedian. Damn I nevr have mod points when I need them.

    2. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You however are truly a COWARD, which is why you posted Anonymously. AFAIK, cowards such as you don't get mod points. [nelson] HA! HA! [/nelson]

  121. segway ht has worked out great for me... by ptorrone · · Score: 1


    i use a segway human transporter (ht) to go over 7+ miles per day, i have given up a car, we're saving over $600 per month (payment, insurance, gas, parking) and i've even lost 10lbs with my extra time that i have each day to do more things like (exercise) as opposed to sitting in traffic. in washington state, cars are the largest source of air pollution.

    you can read about it here on my personal journal of owning a segway ht:
    http://www.bookofseg.com

    recently, i hit 100 miles logged on my gps unit, it took about 14 days of commuting to hit that, i didn't count other trips or previous commute trips so i could keep careful logs. for the first 100 miles or so, i personally saved about $582.00+ by using a segway ht. some things weren't quantifiable, results may vary for others.

    more info can be found here:
    http://www.bookofseg.com/100miles

    pictures from my daily commute:
    http://www.bookofseg.com/commute

    with the first month's saving from using the segway ht we gave it to charity, local groups.

    feel free to email me any time.

    cheers,
    pt

    1. Re:segway ht has worked out great for me... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      How has your city adjusted to the Segway? Are they happy about it did they make any adjustments for it? Do the cops ever give you a hard time?

      What are your thoughts on the ban that cities like San Fransisco and other California Cities have imposed?

      How does the Segway handle in the rain?

    2. Re:segway ht has worked out great for me... by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

      I did some research and bought an EVT4000e scooter (the motorcycle kind) that goes three times faster and farther, and is half the price. It can't ride on the sidewalk like a Segway, but can use the bike lanes when they exist and holds its own nicely on fast roads.

      The sidewalks here are so full of crap anyway that I doubt an HT could go any faster then a person on foot.

      --

      --
      est modus in rebus
    3. Re:segway ht has worked out great for me... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      my city (seattle) uses the ht for the local gov, our city is very much interested in alt transporation. electric cars, car pools, segways, i bike, i car pool, i use a segway. so far the city has been 100% positive and supportive. the cops have never given me a hard time, i have chatted with them-- they all seem to be pleased that i'm not in a car (we have major traffic problems).

      i don't really have any comments or thoughts about the sidewalk ban in san fran, other than-- if i lived there, i'd use it on the street.

      rain: i live in seattle, it rains... a lot. i take in the rain, no problems, i have a raincoat.

      cheers,
      pt

  122. Theme Parks by jmu1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They should really get on the ball. If theme parks were to start buying these things and renting them to the masses that move all over their parks ALL DAY, then they would make a killing in the process, and ol' wheelchair guy(whatever his name is that I can't seem to recall) could keep his business afloat and continue to make good products for the handicaped(which he should have stuck to in the first place).

    Then again, I'm just a technician. "What do I know about diamonds?"

    1. Re:Theme Parks by gethane · · Score: 1

      They are. We saw a handful being used by employees at the Disneyworld parks at the end of January.

    2. Re:Theme Parks by jmu1 · · Score: 1

      Sweet. Going there in May for my Wife's Graduation/ our one year anniversary.

    3. Re:Theme Parks by gethane · · Score: 1

      Have fun! I planned the entire trip and spent over a year beforehand expecting to hate it. "I'm doing this for the kids, I just want them to have fun," and ended up loving it. I'm no fan of megacorporate Disney, but Disneyworld sure provides something people want.. entertainment and escape from the real world.

    4. Re:Theme Parks by jmu1 · · Score: 1

      I know we are veering terribly OT, and I don't really care, but I've been upward to thirteen or fourteen times. I don't mind Disney the Evil Corporate entity... Just Mike Isner. That man wouldn't know the Disney Brothers' vision if it crawled up his pants leg and bit him on the gonads.

  123. When the patents expire by carbon3C · · Score: 1

    then they'll be come a novelty. Competing products will enter the market and the price will come down.

  124. Re:Cars faced similar problems but offered advanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't like at it as Segway vs. Car, I look at it as Segway vs. Walking. There is a LOT of waste in people taking a car (with just themselves) on a trip to a store less than a mile away to pick up a couple items. Walking does away with much of that waste, but cots in time. Segway is a balance between the two, making it faster/easier than walking, but more environmentally efficient than driving.

  125. The reasons for Segway's slow sales... by taustin · · Score: 1

    Does it mention that it was just a stupid idea?

  126. A Segway Ad by kien · · Score: 1

    SEGWAY...when you need a solution but you're not quite sure what the problem is!

    (Sorry, Dean)

    --K.

    --
    Sig: Bad people happen. Try to avoid being one of them.
  127. You just need to know where to look for it by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    You can purchase it right from MediaGab/Amazon

    Shamless Plug!

    1. Re:You just need to know where to look for it by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1
  128. $5,000 to look like a dork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about those of us who want to look like dorks but have a budget?

  129. I'd buy one in a minute! by fleener · · Score: 1

    See this person's Segway journal. I'd buy one in a minute if the price was reasonable (at least under $1000).

    A Segway would save on my commute time, save on insurance and maintenance costs, not pollute the air, and possibly help me lose weight.

  130. yeah about that... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

    My friends and I were walking around last week and I had a great idea. Wouldn't it be fun to strap one of your passed-out drunkard friends to a Segway and just let it drive them around? It doesnt fall over- they could wake up somewhere really cool!!!

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:yeah about that... by gimple · · Score: 1

      It would be perfect if Segway had some sort of colision avoidence system too. Hell, your drunk friend could end up two states away before he woke up.

  131. Re:*it by Monty67 · · Score: 1

    NOT a replacement for bicycles
    --I agree because its an over priced, slow hard to steer (4 hours of training needed), with basic maintenance well beyond the avg person "toy".
    Its a whole new class of transport object.
    --One that does not allow for much storage and much personal safety. If the user ever hit something and did an endo, at the speed it supposedly goes, the lawsuits would fly. Especially if it took someone out.
    The only thing it has in common with a bicycle is the handlebars and the fact that the wheels are round as well! Apart from those 2 physically similar components everything else is different.
    --I agree, bicycles are not allowed on the sidewalk and this thing will be. Which increases the danger 10fold. Add some alcohol and now you have a real weapon. On a bike, since it requires balance, this would not be a problem.
    You wouldn't say that the razor scooter was a replacement for bicycles. Or those sneakers with hidden roller skate wheels.
    --Totally incorrect analogy. A razor is a form of skateboard. i.e. 4 wheels. The comparison would be between skateboards and Razors, OR between roller blades and Sneaker skates. Given that the Segway has 2 wheels the typical analogy would be with the bike. Which if you think about it has already been beefed up, a la Motorcycle.
    I am shocked by the closed minded attitude of slashdotters over the segway.
    --I'm shocked that you don't truly understand how this "device" will interact with its surroundings and how many "inventions" have come before it that serve a much better purpose.
    --But that's what's nice about this forum, you are encouraged to put forth your opinion. BTW, God's last name is not dammit.

  132. In other words, it isn't a product for most people by kfg · · Score: 1

    and can really be thought of as a sort of "pre" wheelchair thingy.

    I don't think that's what the investors ready to change the way cities are built had in mind.

    Is there a market for Segways? Sure, but it's a marginal one, just like wheelchairs, and it's going to stay that way, so he just better face that fact that he went into the wheelchair business, and ended up in the wheelchair business, even if he didn't intend it that way.

    KFG

  133. Screw the Segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I want my flying car!

    1. Re:Screw the Segway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful what you ask for you just might get it.

  134. Slightly OT: Mail pouch over shoulder by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    Why do US mail carriers run around with the pouch over their shoulder? Back-relaxing solutions for varying distances I have seen include a trolley, a ruggedized bicycle and a scooter (as in Vespa).

    1. Re:Slightly OT: Mail pouch over shoulder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why do US mail carriers run around with the pouch over their shoulder? Back-relaxing solutions for varying distances I have seen include a trolley, a ruggedized bicycle and a scooter (as in Vespa)."

      For the same reason that if you are rear-ended in an auto accident, the most prudent thing to do is wince a lot and rub your neck constantly. Built-in excuse :)

  135. The problem with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is having to believe that Kamen would burn the
    VC's that he relies on so badly, just to put
    up a smokescreen.

  136. Heelys wheel shoes by xmda · · Score: 1
    Personally I think Heelys wheel shoes are much cooler and more useful, if only they had been able to make it easy to retract the wheel into the shoe when not in use. (I havent looked at the development lately, but when I looked a year ago, that was not possible)

    When I first saw them I thought: "Why didn't they make those when I was a *kid*?!"

  137. You know... by Cranx · · Score: 1

    ...how is it the general public's problem that when they developed the Segway, they didn't factor in all sorts of realities such as infrastructure to support its use and manufacturing costs?

    I'm actually sort of irked that they got all this free press for a product that has virtually no practical use. A skateboard is more practical for most people.

    They have gotten enough support...time for them to work a few things out on their own without being propped up by the fan base.

  138. Tired of the skeptics by fleener · · Score: 1

    If I could afford a Segway it would replace my car. If my wife had a Segway it would replace public transportation. We own two cars. I commute 5 miles, my wife commutes 2 miles. We only commute with one car because of the associated costs and hassle, but need two cars for evening and weekend situations. A Segway would be a godsend for us. Make the Segway affordable and we could eliminate one of our cars. Oh, and guarantee that our city government won't run off in a spat of fear and illegalize the thing. The fear and skepticism the Segway has received has been downright ridiculous. See and use a Segway before demonizing it.

    1. Re:Tired of the skeptics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife must be some prize if the thought of you riding one of those homoerotic toys doesn't instantly repulse her.

  139. Just need a real war. by fishbowl · · Score: 1, Funny

    A real war will provide an increased demand for things like wheelchairs, artificial limbs, etc.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  140. How To Make A Gay Product Go Straight by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Segway should ask....A NINJA.

    Seriously, I doubt Segway's financial problems have anything to do with "decreased corporate spending".. The damn thing just looks gay. I', sorry, but, it's as simple as that. The thing looks gay, and no one wants to ride it. I think i'm like most people --- i'd have more fun laughing at someone _going by_ on one, than actually _being_ on one.

    If Segway wants to survive, the best thing they could do is fire Dean Kamen, get rid of the lil' sissymobile they're trying to sell, and work on something the public won't feel fucking ridiculous using. For example, give the world a motorcycle that doesn't look like you're trying to compensate for something. Many of us have no desire whatsoever to look like a knuckledragging chimp, or look like we sort of enjoy something big and vibrating between our legs. Give the world a contained, safe, silent, fast, and fuel-efficient single-person vehicle. Weld two Segway frames together and build a Kevlar body around it. I think the public would respond well to that sort of thing.

    If they do nothing, then the situation wont change -- you'll still look like youre standing on a runaway 1930's lawnmower, hurrying to catch up to the Gayhound bus to Manfrancisco.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:How To Make A Gay Product Go Straight by Booie+Paog · · Score: 1

      you think motorcycles look like they're compensating for something, yet you think welding 2 segways together and wrapping kevlar around it DOESN'T look like it's compensating ? yeah, *that* won't look ridiculous. right. maybe direct your opinions that it looks 'gay' to the police forces in NH, MA, and GA: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/021118/5/qbt4.html http://www.segway.com/aboutus/press_releases/pr_12 0701.html http://www.segwaychat.com/topics/306-segway.htm p.s. you think you're like 'most' people ? think again. take a trip outside of your republican right-wing-freak-ridden-ufo-chasing-tinfoil-hat-we aring-vortex-hiking state. you'll see that 'most' people are definitely not like you.

    2. Re:How To Make A Gay Product Go Straight by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      Bahahahahaha.... OMFG

      My troll is a Militant Segway activist!!

      BRRRSSHEHEHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!! Oh man!! I love Slashdot. So many new things to see! God, that's precious.

      I almost hesitate to do this:

      That last troll was posted by:


      McDaniel, Scott mcdev@mcdev.com, pipebomb@pipebomb.net

      McDaniel Development
      2139 Old Highway 5 South, and..
      637 Riverside Dr.
      Ellijay, Georgia 30540, United States
      Tel: (706) 698-5112

      Feel free to call this troll. He's lives with his mom, and that's her voice in the answering machine message. Every time Mr. McDaniel decides to troll, another copy of his personal info will be posted immediately afterward.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    3. Re:How To Make A Gay Product Go Straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah! i'm a segway activist! that's it...right!

      i'm *definitely* not someone who is making an effort every now and again to make sure that i piss you off as much as you piss off everyone else here.

      i'm definitely *not* many people who have decided to fuck with you daily, pretending to be one person.

      btw, you keep getting it wrong. my phone number is: 508-556-3549

  141. Electric scooters by fleener · · Score: 1

    Forgot to say... we seriously considered buying electric scooters to commute, but found them too difficult to control, especially negotiating curves. I doubt the same is true for the Segway because, if anything, it's hailed as being exceptionally easy to maneuver.

    1. Re:Electric scooters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever tried riding a bike? Much cheaper, much faster than a segway. As an added bonus you won't look like a robot tool during the commute. I don't think anyone is scared of the segway. It's just that most people have legs and enjoy using them from time to time. Have you seen/read Dune? This seems like step 1 on the way to us being those big fat spice-eating brains in mobile aquariums.

  142. They're ILLEGAL where I live by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    I'd love to buy one, but they've been OUTLAWED in my home town.

    Personally, I think it's the company's pompousness and intensive lobbying that backfired on them--not the mertis of the device itself.

  143. rather limited target audience by ibbie · · Score: 1

    you know, if i did have five grand to spare, i think i'd opt for a vacation, or a new car, or something else moderately important - not a scooter.

    and i think that perhaps the heart of the sales problem they're having is that plenty of people would agree with me.

    --
    The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
    1. Re:rather limited target audience by RealSkee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. For that money I can get a brand new Yamaha scooter with a better range and usability. Sure eats oil but it is significantly less than any SUV, and let's not forget production of electricity also causes pollution as many cities still rely on oil power, but don't admit to it. IMHO, the inventor uttered 'hoppla' before making the jump.

    2. Re:rather limited target audience by metachimp · · Score: 1

      For that kind of money, you could buy the biggest of the new Vespas, with enough money left over to fuel the thing for years. You could even afford an Aprilia Scarabeo. I'd buy one of those for urban travel before I bought a Segway...

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  144. John Dorr by nikko · · Score: 1

    the P.T. Barnum of the venture world.

  145. Painting a bullseye around the arrow by XNormal · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately with all they hype, the statements that Ginger aka IT would "change the way future cities are designed," good ideas like the wheelchair were lost

    Get up and pick something you believe in, work your ass off, face all the naysayers and give it your best shot. You must be enthusiastic about what you are trying do. Try to get other people excited about it. If you fail, people will call this excitement "hype" and say they always knew it would fail. If you succeed (the same) people will call you a visionary and say they always believed in you.

    It ain't over 'til its over. In 15 years the streets of some cities may be full of Segways or one of its descendents or clones. City planners may yet have to design them to accomodate it.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:Painting a bullseye around the arrow by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      Kind of chicken and egg, that. If no one buys one, why would you design a city around them? That'll go over well with the city budget committee. While you're at it, start requiring rooftop parking for the imminent hover cars. Heck, rip out the roads altogether.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    2. Re:Painting a bullseye around the arrow by namespan · · Score: 1

      If no one buys one, why would you design a city around them?

      City planners/designers in many places are already trending towards realizing that the city designed around the automobile caries with it a lot of the sprawl/urban decay problems that have been the bane of metro areas for 2-3 decades. Ped-friendly downtowns are becoming much more common. So maybe cities won't be designed around segway -- but what if segways drop nicely into ped-friendly cities?

      Mind you, there's still places like Utah where they think that the solution to traffic problems is to simply build more/bigger roads. The west in general, with the exception of the coast, doesn't tend to think in terms of urban design. So it may be a few decades yet. But it's possible.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:Painting a bullseye around the arrow by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Think of it this way:
      How many people that you know bought a computer for their home sometime in the late 70's?
      They were available, expensive, and really just 'toys'.
      Now 30 years later, who _doesn't_ have one?

      Not to say that the segway will turn out this way, but that the end result is far from determined.

      --
      No Comment.
  146. Re:Jesus Saves! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name,
    Thy programs run, thy syscalls done,
    In kernel as in user!

  147. The segway may stink... but the hype is impressive by James+Lewis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd be interested in learning how the Segway has achieved the ENORMOUS amount of hype that it has. It's crazy I tell you. I've talked to people who think it uses some new alternate energy source that will revolutionalize the world. I mean, they have acted like this thing is going to bring us world peace or something. The wierd thing is, I have NEVER seen any journalist say, "Segway... so what?" All you ever hear is them drooling over the thing and begging the company to let them try one. I've never heard ANYTHING negative from the media. I don't ever remember seeing this level of hype, and lack of criticism, about any product before. Anyone have any clues as to how they achieved it?

  148. I'm Sacrificing +2 Karma To Say This... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



    Wow.

    I've heard rumors someone is building a device that will allow you to transmit power directly from the muscles of your legs into a drive shaft..The idea being, that you could concievably have a 100% *human powered* vehicle. Scary.

    Like the Segway, it uses only two w heels. Everything on it is rumored to be mechanical....Everything from the gears to the brakes, all mechanical, all human powered. Unlike most hybrid vehicles, it doesn't require any charging, or any external power source. It cant be used unless theres a person on it...The engine is literally the passenger. I've even heard rumors of two-seater versions floating around. Awesome.

    ITS A FUCKING BICYCLE, ASS-HAMMER.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:I'm Sacrificing +2 Karma To Say This... by Booie+Paog · · Score: 0, Troll

      come on....give me another one of those bones, puppy dog! give me the mcdaniel thingy!

      yeah...that's how i like it. mmmmmmmm.....

  149. Snow handling by antiframe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the engineers from Segway HT was giving a talk at Boston University this afternoon, which I missed because usually they are later in the day. I caught him leaving the building, gliding along on the Segway out onto the slush and snow. I have to just say that I am impressed with its handling given the weather. At least I was surprised, I expected it to fumble around and be difficult to maneuver.

    Or riding a Segway is learned skill and you need some experience to handle it in the snow, which I would assume a Segway HT engineer would have.

  150. Segway's Boring. Bring On The Hovercraft by otherones · · Score: 1

    This from a Forbes article - Dec 2001 article here

  151. The New SUV and better marketing by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

    I think that they are marketing the segway all wrong. Instead of it being all nice and about being a good citizen, they need to market it like SUV: Intimidation, bullying, bigness.

    Think about it, The seg makes you physically,taller, bigger,and heavier. When I was watching a commercial about the segway, I saw that people on foot would automatically get out of the way of the segway person, and the segway person never even appeared to think about making room for others.

    This marketing if done right would apply to the same instincts that SUV owners tend have, *and* they have money to buy one too.

    thanks for reading.
    appreciate replies

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

    1. Re:The New SUV and better marketing by linuxrunner · · Score: 1

      Your sarcasm and comments are not appreciated, just letting you know.

      You may like being called a socialist (you commented being called a socialist in your journal), but in all honestly, it's nothing to be proud of. Socialism is only a small step away from communism. The only difference is that in socialism you (the individual) decide what job you do, and not the state. That's pretty much it.

      To think that you can make a utopia and have everyone equal, is plain stupid. To think that you will blame the rich for being rich is stupid.

      If it wasn't for SUVs and Trucks, us in the North East on that last snow storm would have gotten no where.... Take your stupid crap car on the road then. You would have gotten no where. It would not have been safer, more like a death box with all the sliding cars.

      Comment posted... you have just been owned.

      --
      www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
    2. Re:The New SUV and better marketing by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

      There was no sarcasm. I mean it.
      I believe that SUV drivers know that there cars are more dangerous to other drivers, and willingly choose to put others at risk to protect themselves.
      As for trucks, I have no complaint about them as they tend to be used for work.
      As for snow, suburu's apparently do just fine and are not hulking monsters.

      I think the socialist name calling is rather funny since you, apparently, don't understnad the meaning of socialism.

      as for why I dont like SUV's please check out this link:
      http://www.kansas.com/mld/philly/entertainm ent/col umnists/carlin_romano/4688954.htm

      --

      Sigs are dangerous coy things

    3. Re:The New SUV and better marketing by mulp · · Score: 1

      "If it wasn't for SUVs and Trucks, us in the North East on that last snow storm would have gotten no where.... Take your stupid crap car on the road then. You would have gotten no where. It would not have been safer, more like a death box with all the sliding cars."

      Hmmm, the news reports commented on all the SUVs off the road in the storm this week. The speculation was that the people driving them believed what you do, and went out when they should have stayed home.

      When it comes to stopping and steering, an SUV has no advantage over a small car. Its simply a matter of physics. And if an SUV can get going faster than a small car and has a higher center of balance, its at a disadvantage.

  152. Re:*it by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    > (4 hours of training needed)

    It took me the better part of a summer to really
    get the hang of riding a bike, and I already had experience with trikes.

    >A razor is a form of skateboard. i.e. 4 wheels.

    Razors only have 2 wheels. Skateboards have 4 wheels, but on two trucks, not independent suspension.

    I'd market these things as an alternative to GOLF CARTS. There are entire towns that have golf carts as the primary transport (Peachtree City, GA). Factory floors, college campuses, resorts... A version with a place to put your golf bag might even be a contender for an actual golf cart...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  153. unmitigated disasters by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The modern automobile is an unmitigated disaster, one that has buried the earth in asphalt and caused more wars and strife than assassinations ever did. However, corporate America's expectations are also an unmitigated disaster. We have become subjected to a daily hypemachine stuck on some sort of feedback loop that drowns out real conversation. Kamen contributed to that hype immensely with the Segway, which when viewed by a real human is just a scooter. It's a scooter with a few neat tricks, but it's a scooter. "IT" flooded the news when it was leaked, "IT" flooded the news when it was released, and now "IT" is in the news because of the failure of "IT". The extensive newscoverage of the Segway is even reported as news.

    Compared to other alternative forms of transportation, the Segway ranks pretty low. It involves no real user-power, so it isn't particularly healthy. It weighs 80 pounds, so it isn't particularly portable. It involves pretty extensive electronics, so it is impossible to work on. It requires user intervention, so you can't read a book. Compare that to Electric bikes, which have longer ranges, lower weight, can utilize user power, cost nearly one-tenth as much money, and can carry a sizable number of groceries. Or to the subway, which requires a high initial investment and understandable traffic loads, but which can carry hundreds of thousands of people to their destinations faster than automobiles, and free the user to do with their time what they wish. Or motorized scooters, which can travel faster than the segway for much longer distances at about the same cost. Really, the only thing the Segway has over current alternative transportation options is the ability to go backwards. The balancing mechanism at the core keeps the price too high to be a real alternative to anything, but remove that and the entire design is gone.

    The Segway's obvious limitations as transportation are not why people are venomous about it, but people are venomous about hype that doesn't pan out. Look at the backlash against the commercial that hyped the second-to-last Joe Millionaire as if it were the last. Many people spent the last 5 years being taken in by hucksters who believed their own exaggerations, then exaggerated thoes until they believed their exaggerations^2, then exaggerated those... We've had people claim that a way to complain publically about websites would revolutionize human communication, a way of selling dogfood online would make all public shopping spaces obsolete, a system of releasing odors into the air on cue would necessitate the re-purchasing of all human interface displays, and a way of trading low-quality recordings online would revolutionize world law. Dean Kamen's IT falls squarely with the former three examples, as a hype machine that grew monstrously out of control. A market valuation of 650 million dollars? Two-hundred sixty times gross revenue? The yearly salry of 16,320 people? For an expensive electric bike company?

    I don't think most people here are closing the case on this new technology. I think most people here are closing the case on another company that grossly overpromised, tremendously underdelivered, and stood there blankly wondering where their fortune was. If they can redesign the entire internal mechanism to run on inexpensive mechanical principles and low-cost electronics, can get the range AND SPEED up to 30 miles at roadway speeds, and can sell the thing at real stores rather than online, they still would need to readjust their expectations from inherited world domination to working eagerly to satisfy the customer's needs.

    Kamen us all to flock to his new invention like so many lemmings just makes us feel cheap. He should be working his tail off if he wants our money. He contributed greatly to the health of many Americans, but if he wants to break into this new market he needs to drop the entitlement.

    1. Re:unmitigated disasters by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your reply, it was interesting and made me think of a few things.

      I think you're right about the backlash; the world, or at least the new 'car', was promised by the media and that was not delivered. I partially blame Kamen for that (comments like, oh, 'this will be the new car', didn't help). I also blame the mediagasm in general - it was quite unique.

      Now, I'm off to go price electric bikes. :)

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  154. The problem with SUVs. by BFaucet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a stupid status symbol. So many americans are so fucking obsessed with their image it's not even funny.

    They could have put a more efficient engine in the H2 without a major drop in performance (if any at all), but no... People want to show off they can afford the extra fuel. Of course, having people buy these increases the demand for fuel and drives the price up (it's already high enough IMHO.) This makes a few rich white fellows rich and happy, but also helps make heating oil too expensive for the poor.

    If you must know I drive an '89 Volvo 240 that gets about 20 mpg in the city. I spend $20 a week on gas, so about $1,040 per year (and that's if the price doesn't go up as it already has.) I'm by no means a rich fella (just out of college and paying back loans.) so I can't afford a new car for a while (I want to pay off my student loans before commiting to any new loans)

    If I could, I would buy a civic hybrid (about 40 mpg) I'd pay half of that $1,400... $520 a year... plus a one time $2,000 tax deduction. If the civic lasts for 10 years. that means I'd have saved $7,000.

    Or, I could buy a Honda Insight. 61 mpg in the city means I'd be paying 1/3rd of that $1,040, or about $650 in savings a year (plus the one tme $2000 tax ditty) 10 years would mean $8,500 in savings.

    Now, some freak on CNN is estimating that if America goes to war gas could go up to $5.00 a gallon. I'm guessing that's a bit extreme, so $3.50/gallon is a fair guess. $20 a week at $1.40/gallon means I'm buying 14 gallons o' gas. 14 * 3.50 = 49, so, 49 * 52 weeks in a year = $2,548 a year on gas with my Volvo. or $849 a year with the insight. $1,698 of savings isn't bad at all. Over a 10 year period I'd save $16,980 on gas plus the $2,000. nearly the price of the car ($20,000 with manual trans, AC and stereo.) That'd be like buying the car for $1,020. damn... my Volvo is worth more than that.

    Heh... just calculated savings at $5.00/gallon... $26,270 over 10 years.

    But keep in mind I'm not much of a super self image kinda guy... I don't have fancy rims on my car, I don't dye my hair or dress in crazy clothes, I don't wear logos (what a great idea! pay some rich asshole extra money so you can be his bitch... I mean billboard.) I don't like being ripped off by rich guys who don't need more of my money. My guess is that it's fashionable to buy fuel inefficient veicles because of the amount of cash oil companies are sending car companies who never seem to make a nice looking car that's fuel efficient. Why not? They could use their more efficient engines in SUVs. People don't need a 340 horse power engine in a 3/4 ton Suburban. My Volvo weighs about 1.5 tons and has a 114 horse power engine. It can tow 3,300 lbs and has a gross vehicle weight of 4800 pounds. Typical suburbanites will never need to tow that much.

    --
    -Derick
  155. At least it not called the ... by betanerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Segway Human Interactive Transporter

    --
    Insert sig here (slashdot) Insert cig here (Lewinsky)
  156. Bicycle market by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I think it's a wonderful gizmo, and I want one -- but not at that price. Maybe they're trying to get their R&D back too fast, or maybe their manufacturing costs are still too high, but regardless -- they really need to get the price, and availability to the *general public*, down into the fancy bicycle range. People who need local transport already pay a few hundred for a good bike, and as people age out of the desire to do their own pedalling, they'd be the ideal market for the Segway -- IF it were priced in their existing range for transportation devices.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  157. Nope by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    I can buy an excellent used car for less than a segway. What would you rather: a 5 grand glorified pogostick that can go 11 miles an hour or a 94 Ford Mustang that can go 110 miles an hour. Secondly there is the chick factor: you think your going to pick up girls on a Segway? Maybe if they ride piggyback...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  158. Battery life by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... the battery lasted anywhere from 45 minutes to two hours - forcing carriers to circle back to their trucks several times a day to swap batteries.

    That's the big problem. Delivery people, who might actually find this thing useful, can't use it all day because the battery life is too short. For casual users, it's too expensive.

    The real problem, of course, is excessive hype. This is a minor invention with way too much promotion.

  159. sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5k for 11 mile range pretty much best case. Probably improove with a fuel cell or stirling if they can make it work. But whatever they do if that price stays at 5k you have somethign that costs as much as a used car that provides little to no storage, no protection from the elements, has no deffined traffic avenues, awkward on a sidewalk, a target on the road, and easy to steal. 80 pounds is annoying to you but provides opportunity for a thief that they don't have with a car. No matter how nimble it is its dangerous for other people on the sidewalk, just imagine walking around a mall where say 20% of the people where scooting around on these, there is a reason most malls don't allow rollerblading and skateboards.

    While they could be made usefull enough to buy if you designed a traffic infrastructure around them they would still face a serious limitation in their speed. Cars sit around in congestion for a long time but when the road opens up they can cover alot of ground in a hurry that the Segway can cover only so fast. Even with a congestionless infrastucture for segway you would have a 45 minute one way commute if you lived 7.5 miles away at an average of 10mph. How many buisnesses, especially in metropolitan areas can draw a 15 mile diameter circle around there office and say all of their employees live in it ? And thats if you assume a congestionless climate controled environment independent infrastructure that allows everyone optimum use of a segway. It sucks to sit in a car for 30 miutes to go 2 miles in heavy traffic but when it opens up you can then cover more than 15 miles in the last 15 minutes at the speed limit. Obvious safety concens limits how fast you would want Segways to go and if you don't have a climate controled right of way there are obvious limitations to people spending 45 mintues in the elements on a daily basis. I mean after all which would you preffer, sitting in traffic for an hour and a half in the rain or a 45 minute undisturbed ride home in the rain on one of these gizmos ?

    I can see a use in the most dense population centers, NY and LA obviously come to mind but its gonna take some serious work and commitment on the part of city planners and that will only come from significant numbers of people buying into the technology... and as most people have pointed out in bits and pieces it just dosn't seem that Segway by itself can replace a car except in very limited cases.

  160. Why two wheels? by HermanZA · · Score: 1

    One wheel would have been way more cool and with all that balancing schtuff in it, it would work better than a two wheeler. It would be less wobbly as it would be able to bank in turns. So, when he gets his act together and makes a one wheeler, I *may* be interested.

  161. Corporate spending? WTF? by sean@thingsihate.org · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would many companies have some reason to buy Segways? I can't see the senior staff of mine demanding Segways as perks.

    --

    One of the many things I hate. thingsihate.org
  162. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Reziac · · Score: 1

    That's why if they want it to succeed in the open market, and not just as a niche product that will be forever overpriced and unpopular for that reason alone, I think they need to go after the high-end bicycle market. Better bikes aren't $50, they're $400-$1200. If the Segway was priced at say $500ish, and available at major retailers, I think they could pull in a lot of buyers.

    And a million units sold at $50 net profit is a lot more money than a few dozen units at $500 net profit.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  163. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah... I live in the suburbs of the Motorcity. We don't have sidewalks... what would I do, ride it to my car 15 feet from my house? This was about the stupidest thing I had ever heard. They should just give up on the segway and double their efforts on some sort of hoverbike.

  164. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Exedore · · Score: 1

    I think the two markets overlap quite a bit, but not in the Segway's favor. Anyone who can use a Segway can use a wheelchair, but not everyone who needs a wheelchair can use a Segway (muscle/nerve diseases, paralysis, etc).

    Plus the segway uses a gaggle of specialized sensors, software and whatnot to keep it stable and upright... a problem the wheelchair solves much more cheaply by sporting two additional wheels.

    --

    I take drugs seriously.

  165. Revenge of the Hondas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 5-10 years when all these land yachts wind up in used car lots, or being teenagers' first cars, or Undocumented Worker-Mobiles (I know more people who've been hit-and-run by groups of scared-looking men than who've had AIDS -- it happened to me), or in general falling into the hands of Those People who pay higher insurance rates than We do ... well, the playing field will be leveled just a bit.

    Then we'll see who's serious about the inalienable right to own and operate a Death Hulk.

    I look forward to it. It should be amusing.

  166. lower the price, please by g4dget · · Score: 1

    If this thing cost under $1000, it would be a fun gadget, like expensive skis (I realize everybody's threshold for "fun gadgets" is different). But at the cost of a decent motorscooter, small motorcycle, top-of-the-line electric bicycle, or very upscale bicycle, it just doesn't make much sense. I mean, paying large amounts of money to go around at 12mph??? You can't even talk yourself into saying that "it's good for you" because it provides no opportunity for exercise--walking is healthier and less dangerous.

  167. Re:The segway may stink... but the hype is impress by retro128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been scratching my head over the same thing. The only thing I can come up with is that it seems that Dean Kamen has a Steve Jobs-type charisma and celebrity status, and everyone knows that half of a journalist's job is celebrity ass-kissing, which is why you haven't heard anyone say "So what?". Everything you see written about Dean Kamen says stuff like "inventor, entrepreneur, all round great guy, blah blah blah", but what it comes down to is that he's trying to sell a scooter for 5 grand that's being outlawed in the very city centers it was intended for in the first place....San Francisco comes to mind.
    Here's why I think the Segway is failing: Those who can afford it and those who would use it are two separate markets. The people who can afford it would tend to be successful professionals who have cars to drive to work and live in suburbia. Are they going to drive their cars to the edge of the city, pull their 80-pound Segway out of the trunk, and cruise to work that way? I think not. Those who would use it would most likely live in the city where they work and would cruise there in a Segway. The problem is that when you are paying $2100/mo for 600 sq ft, you might want to think about stretching your legs and walking instead of racking up another $5000 bill. Also to consider is the fact that most city dwellings are in highrise buildings...Are you going to haul your Segway up the stairs?

    --
    -R
  168. Re:Cars faced similar problems but offered advanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK... so you go to the store for a couple of items.... what do you do? Carry them home in a backpack? And, what if it's raining? No toilet paper for you! The Segway is a toy. It's not going to replace cars or walking anytime soon.

  169. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by kfg · · Score: 1

    No, the high end bicycle market is $3000-$5000. Which actually makes the Segway competitive, but notice all the people here saying "Why not just get a bike?"

    Many of those (including me) are people perfectly willing to drop several grand on a bike. Price isn't really the issue. The issue is that the Segway just doesn't really make any sense at all to someone willing to ride a bike.

    KFG

  170. Fair is fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see an apology over there to the effect of "If you're smart enough to get this joke, you probably thought it yourself less than an hour after the Segway was unveiled."

  171. Let's apply the same standards... by Pii · · Score: 1
    Come on, reckless drivers aren't limited to the SUV driving crowd.

    Look at the number of morons behind the wheel in those rice-burning lowered street racers...

    I'm pretty sure you'd be just as dead if one of those jokers smashed into you while you were out running, or cycling. Would you somehow be less angry if it was one of them that clipped you? (You should probably be on the sidewalk anyway, whenever possible. Not because you have no right to be on the road, but more because having the right-of-way doesn't do you much good after you've been ground to hamburger...)

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Let's apply the same standards... by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>You should probably be on the sidewalk anyway, whenever possible.

      That is illegal in most cities and states. Not in Palo Alto, CA (in case you ever visit and have a bike), but most places I know of.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  172. Enforcers of conformity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is surprising to read so many neophobic anti-Segway critiques based on the "it looks dorky" argument. I think it looks beautiful, and would love to have one. I know what it is like to be punished and verbally assaulted by the narrow minded normal majority, since I used an excellent DaHon folding bike for several years. Even though the bike was convenient, lightweight, and had great acceleration/handling, only open-minded kids and women thought it was cool at first sight. Every time I rode I had to put up with packs of teens and men noisily putting me down for the crime of being different.

    Being surrounded by change-hating idiots is part of life, and their mean attitude is its own punishment. In my view, any nation that embraces cars to the point of daily dependency is insane. Get a horse!

  173. Well by sulli · · Score: 1

    I suspect the SFPD has slightly more important things on its mind than cracking down on Segway users. Buy one from Amazon and I bet you'll get one ticket per year.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  174. There are a number of production engines by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    For various purposes at the low but useful power range. 1-20kW

    They are expensive still though.

    Google lights the way:

    http://directory.google.com/Top/Science/Technolo gy /Energy/Devices/Stirling_Engines/?tc=1

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  175. 4x4 segway... by BartFatima · · Score: 1


    currently being developed for the suv afficionados. ;)

  176. Police @ Airports by tweakt · · Score: 1
    The only value I have seen in something like this is possibly for mailmen who normally walk their route or in large warehouses.

    I finally saw one of these in real life. Police were using them to travel around Chicago's Ohaire airport. One passed by me heading out of the terminal. Minutes later he returned, riding the segway carrying coffee and donuts.

  177. Facts and Opinions are not the same by Pii · · Score: 1
    "Aside from the fact that SUVs are proven to be unsafe to other drivers on the roads?"

    This is a fact. It's irrelevant to me, but a fact nonetheless. I don't drive like an asshole, but I put my family in an SUV to afford them an added measure of protection from the people on the road that do drive like assholes.

    My family and I are entitled to as much safety as we can afford. That others drviers cannot afford the same degree of protection isn't my fault, nor is it my problem. Like I said, I'm already a good driver... If other people manage not to crash into me, then there's no safety issue.

    "The fact that most people who drive SUVs don't know how to drive well, especially a vehicle that big."

    That, my friend, is not a fact. It is an opinion. The difference is that a fact can be supported by some kind of evidence, and an opinion can be spouted in the absence of any evidence.

    Sure, there are plenty of SUV drivers that probably shouldn't be operating a vehicle that comes anywhere near that mass, but the same can be said of the drivers of many smaller vehicle types. Take the Import Street Racer crowd as an example. Sure, their cars are smaller, but that doesn't make me feel any safer when they go whizzing by at double the speed limit, or as they dodge in and out of dialy traffic as though there was a prize waiting for them at their destination.

    None of this, of course, has anything to do with how dumb an idea the Segway is. (And *THAT* is just my opinion, but it seems to be supported by the marketplace.)

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    1. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      My family and I are entitled to as much safety as we can afford. That others drviers cannot afford the same degree of protection isn't my fault, nor is it my problem. Like I said, I'm already a good driver... If other people manage not to crash into me, then there's no safety issue.

      You are entitled to as much safety as you can afford, but not with putting other people at risk in the same time. You are just as safe in a Honda Odyssey, right? I'll take your word for it that you are a good driver, and thank you for it, but many people aren't. Hell, I just about got hit walking to work this morning by someone backing out into the sidewalk.

      That, my friend, is not a fact. It is an opinion. The difference is that a fact can be supported by some kind of evidence, and an opinion can be spouted in the absence of any evidence.


      I suppose I should say, "The fact that most people are bad drivers, precipates most people that own SUVs don't know how to drive well and it compounds into a worse scenario with a large vehicle" -- better? :)

      Take the Import Street Racer crowd as an example. Sure, their cars are smaller, but that doesn't make me feel any safer when they go whizzing by at double the speed limit, or as they dodge in and out of dialy traffic as though there was a prize waiting for them at their destination.

      As a racer, I can assure you that if you continue on your path, you are very safe. Much more so than say, trying to cut me off :) The only time I will go dodging through traffic is when some asshole refuses to get out of the left hand lane. The thing is, a lot of the racers aren't speeding to get to the destination faster, they're speeding because it's something they enjoy. Sometimes you just let loose, and go. It's usually much more sane to do it at night when there is no traffic out, and I've tapped a car going near 160 at 2 in the morning before, and it's relatively safe for me to do so. I know how to handle a sports car, I can drift very well, I can pull some pretty crazy manuevers to keep myself safe.

      Bad drivers make other people turn into bad drivers. People who can't merge, have too big of cars (and yes, the H2 is too big. I don't care who you are, you don't need a vehicle that big), that's the root problem of the roads these days.

      And yes, the Segway is a dumb idea. It'd be cool for $300 and I'd probably buy one. For $5K, that's half a new Yamaha R1 superbike.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be one of the most illogical and immature posts I've ever read on Slashdot. You in one breath calling other people bad and unsafe drivers and berating them for buying SUVs and in the next breath spouting off about going 150+ mph and doing "crazy" manuevers. Watching "The Fast and the Furious" does not mean you "know how to handle a sports car". I think *YOU* are more of a threat on the road than the average SUV-driver.

    3. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is a fact. It's irrelevant to me, but a fact nonetheless. I don't drive like an asshole, but I put my family in an SUV to afford them an added measure of protection from the people on the road that do drive like assholes.
      Great, contribute to the big car arms race. Ever heard of Prisoner's Dilemma?
    4. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      You're 100 percent right.

      Sucks that you can't buy a car because you like it, but instead because you need the armor, but that's how it is.

      ~D

    5. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by enkidu · · Score: 1
      My family and I are entitled to as much safety as we can afford.

      Except that SUV's in general aren't safer. Yes they are safer in multi-collision crashes, but they have a much higher rate of rollover AND have a higher rate of fatalities when rollover occurs. The laws that classify an SUV as a light truck allows it to pollute more also allows it to be less safe in roll overs. See this site for some good reasons why SUV's aren't safer. Also, if you're already a good driver, having a heavier, bigger vehicle makes you a worse driver because braking/accelerating/maneuvering are ALL compromised by the increased weight and height of an SUV. Just because you feel safer in an SUV doesn't mean you are safer.

      --

      There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
      -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    6. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      This is a fact. It's irrelevant to me, but a fact nonetheless. I don't drive like an asshole, but I put my family in an SUV to afford them an added measure of protection from the people on the road that do drive like assholes.


      SUV's might be safer when hitting a smaller car. But what about rollover? What about when more and more people think like you do, and you wont be hitting that small japanese sedan, but another huge SUV? Most of the added security of SUV will be negated when more and more people drive SUV's.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    7. Re:Facts and Opinions are not the same by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Typical reaction. "Every OTHER SUV driver is dangerous on the road."

      SUV's, along with guns, increase in demand the more saturated the market is with them.

  178. Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by glrotate · · Score: 1

    I remember having a simmilar notion about sneakers as a kid.

    1. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      You better believe they do. My $1000 dollar bike made me go so much faster than my previous $350 bike it was unreal. (this was in the 1993-1995 timeframe, prices would be different now.) And neither bike had any suspension/shocks. The $1000 model had very narrow tires, light frame, and shift levers with the brakes (new option at the time), and my top speed was 48 mph. Try that with a Huffy, which was my preferred bike as a teenager in the 80s.

    2. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by joggle · · Score: 1
      I don't know...

      I bike alot (a few hundered to 1000 miles per year), but I've never payed more than about $400 for a bike. I'm currently using a cheaper model Schwinn road bike (used) and get around fine. It seems that wind, hills and conditioning make a much bigger impact on your speed than having great wheels, hubs or whatnot (although having a good gearset makes a world of difference, but those don't necessarily cost much).

      I can understand spending more if you're racing or doing serious mountain biking and need good suspension and a solid frame, but otherwise I just don't see it.

    3. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Well, that's what I thought too when i bought the $350 Specialized bike in 1993. (By the way, these are road bikes, not mountain bikes.) I rode it all over San Francisco, Napa, Marin, the whole north and west side of the Bay area. It was definately a better bike than the Huffys I rode as a teenager, when I never thought I would spend more than the $125 that they cost.

      Then in 1995 my Specialized was stolen, and when I went to the bike shop to replace it, I was open to suggestions. The $1000 Scott was lighter, and the tires were so narrow I thought they would pop when I sat down. But at 120psi they hold up quite well. What made the price so high was the shift levers being integrated into the brake levers, which was new technology at the time. But I had the cash to spend, so I got it.

      The funny thing was a week later I found my original bike, so now I had two bikes, and then a month later it got stolen again. I always forgot to lock it up. But with being able to compare both bikes during that time, I was very happy with my decision to buy the $1000 Scott, and when the Specialized disappeared again, I just wrote it off. And I kept my new bike in my room, even though the rules prohibited it.

      Now, as far as spending more than $1000, only if I was still really into riding everywhere I could. I'm too old for that though, and racing is out of the question, so I will keep this one, ride it as I can, and enjoy it.

      As far as what affects speed, of course conditioning helps more than the hardware, but once you are well conditioned, the better hardware makes a huge difference. I've seen it from both vantages, getting in better condition, and lately getting out of condition. The hardware improvements still are much desired.

      You should try it. Do you take your bike to a specific bike shop, or even just buy supplies at one? (I used to ride my bike 6 miles to get to a good one, because the one 3 miles away was not responsive enough.) If so, ask if they will let you test ride a new bike in the $1000-$1500 category. Go around town for an hour, see if it doesn't handle better then your current bike. As I said, I had the chance to test my two almost side-by-side for a month. Not that you will end up buying a new bike, but when your Schwinn is ready for retirement, you will have a better understanding when the salesman tries to sell you one.

    4. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by joggle · · Score: 1
      Well, I did notice a big difference going from my old mountain bike to my new (used) road bike. Although the mountain bike had an aluminum frame, the road bike is at least 15 lbs lighter (which obviously makes a difference going up hills) and has skinny wheels (about 90 PSI at most I think). I guess integrated shift levers have come down in price as mine has them (although, like I said I bought it used). My normal advice to people is to do what I did and pick up a road bike used from a bike rental place as they usually take great care of their bikes and usually sell them after just a couple of years.

      I usually shop at Performance Bikes for parts and I know for sure that they do allow test rides (I bought my mountain bike from them). I just couldn't stomach paying so much for a new bike when I could get one used for a fraction of the cost that (in my mind) was nearly equivalent in performance.

      Thanks for the advice, though. In the future, I might get a more expensive bike, but only if I start riding more and/or make some more money :).

    5. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by kfg · · Score: 1

      If you don't bike a lot your bike is just fine. If you don't race there really isn't any reason to pay more than about $1500.

      But for those of us that do bike a lot ( I know you think you do, but I can put on 1000 miles in a single *week* and often go a couple hundred just for lunch) then, yes, that $1500 dollar bike makes one *hell* of a difference, and even costs less in the long run.

      KFG

    6. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by joggle · · Score: 1
      That must be one heck of a lunch break! Even at 50mph that would take at least 4 hours! I don't think even Lance Armstrong himself could pull that one off (in that time), or at least not around here because its much too hilly.

      'Alot' is relative, which is why I specified what I considered alot in parenthesis. I was going to try Ride the Rockies last year (even got registered) but ultimately had to cancel due to a scheduling conflict. Even for that, though, I thought my bike was sufficient, not that I would have finished anywhere near first, of course. I think the longest route I took while training was about 100 miles and that took the entire afternoon (it was hilly and windy, what can I say). Several guys flew past me after a while, but I blamed that entirely on their superior conditioning, not their bikes. I guess it could have been both... As far as lowering costs, I think you'd have to bike as much as most people drive their cars before that would happen (heck I had the same bike (no car) through college and did fine). As long as you don't grind your gears, clean your chain and otherwise regularly maintain your bike, how much could you really save by getting a more expensive bike?

    7. Re:Do those $5000 bikes make you go faster? by kfg · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean over a "lunch break," I meant to go to a particualar place for lunch. :)

      That's about a 12 hour day if I'm in a hurry. 14 if I'm not.

      I don't own a car. So yes, I bike as much, or more, than most people drive. Which means I'm in pretty good shape. Which is also why a Segway is absolutely useless to me. Even if it were free. It simply isn't capable of taking where at go, let alone at the speeds I get there.

      Certainly conditioning is more important. The rider is the engine.

      But on a bike it isn't like a car where buying a more powerful car gives so many miles per hour more. It's more subtle than that. You go a *bit* faster, but the real thing is that on the better bike it takes less out of you to do it. And if you ride 50 to 100 miles a day you might be surprised at what that "feel" can do for eating up the miles in comfort. If you wear out, the engine just doesn't go so good anymore.

      KFG

  179. Can't remember who said it but.... by linuxelf · · Score: 1

    A Hummer driving through the Australian outback is a tool.

    A Hummer trying to parallell park in front on Neiman's is being driven by a tool.

    --
    - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
  180. Sidebar: observation on a line in the Wired story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Kamen has been trying for more than a decade to develop an external-combustion engine.)

    Hmm. Isn't that a description of a steam engine?

    This guy really has to get out more. ["This guy" = (Kamen | Wired writer)]

  181. Please no more SInclair references. by glrotate · · Score: 1

    You are not the first or second or even the 10000th person to point this out on the thousands of forums where the Segway has been discussed. We've all seen the Sinclair deathtrap by now.

  182. Re:Segway. Nothing to see here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey now. When was the last time you fit 5 people in a @#$@# Civic?!?! Perhaps if you hang out with a bunch of midgets or toddlers........

  183. But It's the economy's fault !!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear lord, oh how I hate that pathetic war cry ...

    BullSh*T ... People just don't like stupid ideas, and flawed "business plans", get it?
    Nothing "wrong with the economy", so to speak.

    The dot-com burst wasn't anything to do with the "economy" either.
    it was just a bunch of idiots throwing money at business plans that were basically, non-existant. The vapor-plan.

    What they bought into, was the dream.
    That's what you get for "Leap first, ask questions later.." you get burned.

  184. Look at Her!! Look at Her!! by Enraged_jawa · · Score: 1

    " ...that people riding these look like dorks who are trying to hold in a massive bowel movement... "
    I think she looks pretty damn hot on one..

    1. Re:Look at Her!! Look at Her!! by metachimp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but she still looks like a dork. Cute, but dorky. Maybe I'll ask her out...

      --
      The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  185. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in the segway now comes with snowshoe accessory. For just $1000 US more.

  186. What "IT" was.. by Bumpy+bits · · Score: 1

    IT was a STIRLING engine that could purify even the dirtiest water by recycling it's heat (ie, energy) - enough for a whole village of people.

    Mabey it's just me but that SOUNDS like the ..it !

    1)
    http://www.cmonitor.com/stories/news/state20 02/111 4kamen_2002.shtml

    2) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.09/kamen.html

  187. USPS trial periods - duration and outlook? by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    I know the USPS and some other companies bought some segways to try out - how long were these trials to last, and what is the outlook so far? Does anyone here know?

  188. The wheelchair isn't made by him. by zackbar · · Score: 1

    He licenses everything else out to other companies.

    The company that makes the segway makes nothing else.

    Personally, I think the think might be great fun, but I've got a few problems with it.

    It's too expensive for what it does. I can't see spending 5 grand on something like that, even if it's great fun. I can't use it to get to the office even in the best of weather (30+ miles). If I both lived downtown and worked downtown, I might use it if it weren't so expensive. But the subway is far cheaper.

    Since I live out in the suburbs, I couldn't even use it to go to the grocery store. I could get TO the grocery store, but I doubt if I'd be allowed inside with it. I'd be afraid it would get stolen if I left it outside.

    The limited distance isn't as much of a problem for most, I suspect. Anyone going more than 11 miles will probably drive anyway. What would be far better than extending the distance is if it were far lighter, and folded up into a backpack. Then I could use it to go the 15 blocks from the office and carry it onto the train.

  189. confused? by g4dget · · Score: 1
    I think that the 'angry' responses are from people who would buy one if they could easily afford one

    That is exactly what people who are critiquing the Segway are saying. They aren't saying it angrily, they are saying it by way of explanation. For $500, I'd buy one, for $5000, no way. I could pay $5000 for it, but there are other things that are a lot more fun that I can get for that kind of money.

    much like linux users who put down macs, while secretly drooling over one.

    You are as wrong on that one as on the Segway. The price difference between a Mac and a Linux PC isn't large enough to make that factor into most people's buying decisions. Sorry, but the reality is that people use Linux because they want to.

  190. Segway no way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOMBACLOT!

  191. A smart person with the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would buy one. They'll be a collectors item one day and go for many times the price. (at the moment, I'm just a poor student...)

  192. Why it's not selling by titoj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oddly enough, I read this article last week, about one hour before I went to my product design class - with Professor Karl Ulrich. We spent half the class talking about the Segway, and if I garnered anything from the lecture, the main reason for the failure (thus far) is because the company forgot the basic tenets of product design. Rather than creating a product based on customer needs (i.e. a portable dialysis machine), they tried to create customer needs based on a product family (dynamically stabilized transportation, a la the ibot).

    As a side note, the Segway uses a lot of expensive parts, and two of them at that. There is one gyroscopic unit, but two motors, two controls boards, etc.. When you add it up, the price becomes unreasonable for almost anyone. Granted, most of us probably thought it was neat, but we definitely can't afford one.

  193. Re:Segway. Nothing to see here. by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    2 Adults and 3 kids can comfortably sit in a honda civic (especially the new ones). I went on a road trip with 3 friends and we all rode in comfort, and still had room for the cooler in the backseat.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  194. Lighter, smaller, cheaper by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's the "consumer model" Segways that was being talked about when the news and hype first hit a couple years ago. It is the "P-series". If you see pictures/videos of Dean Kamen on a Segway, you'll notice that he's riding on a Segway with smaller wheel (the rims are "solid" looking instead of the multi-spoked "performance car" looking ones). They are about 20 lbs. lighter (69 lbs.), and are believed to be targeted for sale at around $3,000. More importantly, they are smaller -- two of these smaller "P-series" Segways are supposed to fit in the trunk of a small-to-mid-size car.

    The P-series are still undergoing development testing. Supposedly, the extended community tests at Celebration, Florida, will be the first use of the P-series outside of Segway LLC.

    I bought an I-series for myself (couldn't resist), but I look forward to the P-series. In fact, had the P-series been available already, I probably would have spent the extra $1000 to buy two P-series (it's a lot of fun to ride with a partnet).

    Call me a fool if you want. But I'm having fun. And, it goes more places than my former coworker's jetski...

  195. Problems with the Segway: by crazyphilman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Rollerblades are easier, work better, are more maneuverable, and a Lot Cheaper.

    2. Bicycles go just as fast and have an effectively infinite range with no recharge necessary (except for that stop at the pub). And, are cheaper.

    3. Skateboards can probably go just as fast, are just as maneuverable, don't have to be recharged... Etc.

    4. People have had all of the above cheaper, better alternatives to the Segway, but they don't use them because they're dangerous to put in the street and are illegal to use on the sidewalk. Mainly because of the danger to pedestrians. Which is why the Segway won't be legal for sidewalk use either.

    Result: The segway doesn't stand a chance. How could it? Can't put it in the road (you'll be roadkill), can't ride it on the sidewalk (you're just as dangerous to pedestrians as an inline skater)...

    Kind of makes you wonder how much thought they put into this weirdo pogo-stick-looking thing. Are all the people in startup companies yes men? Did no one speak up and say, "Yes, but if they make riding things on sidewalks legal, can't I use my bike or rollerblades?"

    Tsk. Rich people are crazy.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    1. Re:Problems with the Segway: by Vagary · · Score: 1

      I think the Segway is a lot less effort, especially when going up hills. In particular, ptorrone, who has done a lot of posting in this story, explains that he doesn't have a shower at work and frequently needs to meet with clients first thing in the morning.

      Last summer I biked to work every day and got a T-shirt soaked in sweat for my trouble. As much as I appreciated the exercise, I would prefer using electric in the morning and work my ass off in the afternoon.

    2. Re:Problems with the Segway: by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what makes you think standing on a non air conditioned Segway in the hot sun isn't going to make you sweat? You're going to sweat like a dog. You're going to be segwaying along, sweating away. Sweat, sweat, sweat. Ick, foo.

      If it's hot, and you have to meet with clients, do as all others do and take a cab or drive. I drive, personally, because I live fifteen miles away from my job and it's easier than bicycling. And, of course, we got sixteen inches of snow the other day... ;)

      Alternative: Sew a Peltier cooler, a battery, and a network of coolant tubes into a zoot suit! I've been wanting to build an air conditioned zoot suit for the past three years. It would have to be orange, of course, and come with a two and a half foot wide "bomb throwing hat". Orange air conditioned zoot suit, peach colored silk shirt and hankerchief, and neon red tie! Yowza, babe.

      Oh! And, a pair of mirrored Ray-Bans. Of course.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    3. Re:Problems with the Segway: by captainbajoo · · Score: 1

      Have you ridden one? I have. I am not convinced by your arguments.

      1) Rollerblades require some sense of balance, Segway does not. Rollerblades do not "work better" in preventing you from falling over or getting you up a hill quickly with minimal effort.

      2) Same with bicycles.

      3) Step onto a skateboard. Make a ninety degree turn without forward motion (and, obviously, without dismounting, pickup up the board, and setting it back down). Segway can, skateboard cannot. They are not equally maneuverable.

      In addition to which, Segway is battery powered, not operator powered. You get the benefit of the other vehicles (faster transit) without the cost (physical exertion that varies with terrain).

      All of which is really building up to this:
      4) These alternatives are not used on sidewalks because they pose a danger to pedestrians. Why? They are hard to stop.

      If you are travelling some speed on any of these and wish to, say, avoid a pedestrian, you must either maneuver to avoid the obstacle, or reduce your speed, possibly to a stop. All of these vehicles are pretty equal when you can make the evasive maneuver, though Segway benefits over bicycle by having a profile negligibly different from another pedestrian.

      But let us assume the worst case, and you must come to a sudden complete stop. This is tricky on all the man-powered vehicles, especially rollerblades, because there is little you can do to reduce your speed. Rollerblades? Forget it, you might as well just plow right through. Bicycles? Yes, there are brakes, but you'll need some stopping room if you don't want to through yourself over the handlebars. Skateboard? Bail, I guess.

      However, with Segway, stopping is trivial, because the motors reabsorb the momentum as quickly as they produced it (in fact, they put the energy back into the battery). Furthermore, the operator needs exert only minimal effort to effect stopping - merely a (natural) recoiling backwards - thus reducing the time between "assessment of stopping situation" and "full stop." This even mitigates collision situations, should the operator fail to lean backwards to prevent it, because colliding with an obstacle will alter the balance of the vehicle, kicking in the motors, and reducing the net force against the obstacle.

      As a matter of fact, they put a lot of thought into this pogo stick. It really does provide the groundwork for a solution to powered pedestrian travel. I do agree it's aiming too high right now: it's weight, limited range, and price tag are all valid counts against it. But it does make real improvements over existing vehicles for pedestrian-level traffic.

    4. Re:Problems with the Segway: by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I disagree with some of your points. For instance:

      1. To stop a skateboard, you step hard on the back, driving it against the ground and skidding to a stop (the front wheels are off the ground while you're doing this -- it takes some balance, but it does work).

      2. To stop rollerblades, you put one at a 90 degree angle to the other and brake. Or you drag the toe. Or, if you're any good, you just do a quick circular spin and stop right there, turning your momentum into rotation. Works the same as in ice skating. Of course, common sense says don't be blading at a full-out run on the sidewalk.

      3. Most bicycles have a marvellous invention called BRAKES. If you are bicycling at a reasonable speed, say, 15 mph or less, this shouldn't be a problem. By the way: No one with half a brain clamps down on the front brake only, so most people do NOT go over the handlebars.

      I think you're building straw men here. It won't work; I've thought these arguments through. If one is sensible, and isn't riding like a mad, Manhattan courier, then he generally won't get into trouble. But I still wouldn't advise riding on the sidewalk; it's inconsiderate.

      I'd like to mention also that the Segway doesn't exempt you from the laws of physics. If you're going too fast and you pull a sudden stop, you're going to end up flopping over the front of it, or losing your balance and doing some kind of undignified face-plant. Operator skill, I imagine, features heavily in this.

      As far as going uphill, let's see how long that famous battery of yours lasts. I bet you wear it out pretty quickly. IN contrast, me and my bicycle can just shift to lower gears and power it out. Like I said, infinite range. How is your segway going to help you if work is 7 miles away? That's a fourteen mile round trip, and you'll run out of juice three quarters of the way home. My bike'll get me there though.

      I respect your point of view, but I don't think you've countered my points yet.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    5. Re:Problems with the Segway: by captainbajoo · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I likewise respect your view and agree that the battery problem is a pressing issue with Segway.

      You would like me to counter your points. Let me re-iterate your points as I understand them in order that you may correct me if I have erred.

      1. You state that rollerblades and the like are existing, better alternatives to Segway for the purpose of pedestrian level vehicular movement.

      2. You state that Segway cannot succeed as a street vehicle (I agree), but that it also cannot succeed as a pedestrian vehicle because it poses a danger to pedestrians, just as do the other (outlawed) vehicles.

      My counter to these points is that
      1. Segway is as maneuverable or moreso than the other vehicles, can travel as fast or faster, is more stable, and requires less operator input of energy. Therefore it does improve over the other vehicles (though at large monetary cost; the willingness of an individual to pay for these particular improvements is a subjective economic issue).

      2. Segway poses less of a danger to pedestrians because it has controlled systems that can more safely reduce its speed in a crisis, and does not impinge on pedestrians' persons because of its slim profile.

      Your counterpoint to 1. is that Segway's battery may fail. This depends on terrain and the nature of your destination. Note that, while going uphill is battery intensive, going down hill is not, and will reclaim some of that lost energy. Furthermore, if there is an electrical outlet at my destination, I can plug it in while I work, and then set out again partially or even fully recharged. Range is only limited by the chemistry of the battery; the specific ranges you listed are actually quite attainable with a Segway, and this can only improve with improvements in cell technology.

      I will acknowledge I am not well versed in the fine details of stopping while on rollerblades, etc. But you do say "common sense" "people with half a brain" won't go full speed, or if they do, can execute one of these plans to stop. However, those plans ("turning your momentum into rotation") do require some level of skill to execute and may result in loss of balance:
      1) Stopping a skateboard "takes some balance."
      2) Turning your momentum into rotation is really, really going to require adjustment of balance.
      3) I concede braking on bicycles is very effective. Segway's advantage to the bicycle is really in the area of "saving work."

      Loss of balance, especially unexpected loss of balance, is what is really dangerous to operator and pedestrian, and it is a very immediate concern on 1) and 2). On the Segway, balance is not an issue, at all. This is a definite improvement, both over existing vehicles and for pedestrian safety.

      As for stopping, true, "Segway doesn't exempt you from the laws of physics." I did not mean to imply one can stop instantaneously on Segway. But your assessment is also erroneous. On a Segway, one cannot "pull a sudden stop" (unlike, say, on a bicycle), in other words, reduce velocity of vehicle too quickly relative to velocity of operator, because the Segway's computer system is controlling the reduction of velocity. The system has been tuned to prevent this. Losing your balance is again a non-issue; the system was designed to address this point from the very start. Operator skill factors only as much as it does in any of the other vehicles (perhaps less so because the operator is assisted by the computer).

      Have I addressed your points?

    6. Re:Problems with the Segway: by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      You have indeed addressed my points (if not invalidated them), and eloquently. However, I still think that operator-powered vehicles such as the ten-speed are going to be more effective for travel. Still, none of this is going to catch on until municipalities start creating protected bicycle (for example) only lanes, with some kind of concrete median between them and the car lanes. This has happened in spots in NYC, for instance, along the hudson around Chelsea. But it's not widespread.

      Anyway, I guess it basically comes down to this: For the amount of money the Segway costs, with its limited range and capacity, and time to recharge, human powered vehicles seem like a much better buy. Think about it: a plain-jane ten-speed costs under a hundred bucks, is faster than the Segway, can carry more weight, and has an effectively infinite range. So why would anyone buy a Segway? Remember, again, that neither the Segway nor the bicycle can run on sidewalks so neither offers an advantage there (except for the bicycles superior brakes, that is).

      Again, since everything with wheels has to travel in the road (well, except wheelchairs) and no one really wants to fight the SUV's for right-of-way, I think the Segway is doomed. Which is my whole point. Given that you have to use the road, or a bike lane, you just can't beat the basic utility and value of a bicycle. And, as you can see by looking out your window, nearly no one has chosen the bicycle over the SUV.

      Leaving alone the other alternatives, skateboard, rollerblades, et al... The bike is the strongest alternative anyway.

      Interesting conversation. Don't get me wrong, the Segway is neat, but I wouldn't want one myself. What I'd want is the little gasoline-powered scooter I saw a mechanical engineering major down in Arizona build. He was zipping around campus on the thing, doing maybe 30mph, way back in the early nineties. It had a little handlebar, with brakes, etc. Looked cool, and was made out of an old skateboard and some pipe.

      And, of course, anyone with some mechanical skills can build one of those in a weekend. All it takes is a skateboard frame, a motor from a weed-whacker, a little length of bike chain, some fat rubber tires, some pipe, and some ten-speed bicycle parts (levers, etc). Not hard, maybe 200.00 worth of parts?

      I think the Segway is more or less a conspicuous-consumption item.

      I just had a thought; I could build a little scooter like that for around 200 bucks, and if I spread the wheels out in a wide enough pattern, it would be totally stable without all the weird electronics of the Segway. I'd power it with gasoline, it would have like, a thirty or forty mile range, it would be faster than the Segway, and it would have BRAKES... Hmm...

      Nah. It still wouldn't be legal to put on the sidewalk. I'd get run over by a minivan or something.

      Kind of a neat idea though.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  196. Call me when.... by SB5 · · Score: 1

    Call me when Segway can hit 200 mph. Why buy a Segway when I can spend twice the money on something that goes 150 mph, and negotiates traffic and pedastrian traffic extremely well. It is called a motorcycle and it has been around for years. What was drugs was Dean Kamen on and where I can get them?

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  197. walk bike skate or scoot by rhino_badlands · · Score: 1

    walk bike skate or scoot, which would you rather choose at 1/100th of the price of one of those stupid things.

    yeah its a cool idea, and has very advanced technology in it but its just not praticle. maybe if the price went down to 200 or 100 dollars then it would be a hot seller.

    --
    - MOSKIE
  198. Duhhhrr.... ever tried RENTING THEM OUT??? by mbstone · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bitch, bitch, complain. I wouldn't buy a car without renting the same model first. Why should Segways be any different? If there is anyplace to RENT a Segway, I haven't heard about it. How about renting them, for example, at all of the Las Vegas Strip hotels? You rent the thing outside the lobby of Casino A and turn it in at Casino B. When you are ready to return to your hotel, you get another one from the pickup line at Casino B and return it to Casino A. The Segway is the perfect vehicle for Vegas Strip transportation: The casinos are all within 1/2 to 2 miles of each other, and few tourists carry any baggage except for their (dwindling) bankrolls. Only problem, it would put the Vegas taxicab mafia out of business.

  199. How to Flash your Status by duck_prime · · Score: 1
    Whats wrong with a status symbol?

    Without them how else do you display your status?
    Well, around here you could show your fake counterculture street-cred by bagging on an already-unpopular group -- say, SUV owners or Microsoft users -- and thinking you're all "on the edge".

    Much cheaper than buying a Segway.
  200. London? by alexpage · · Score: 1

    Sounds perfect for London now the Congestion Charge is stopping most people using cars in the City...

    My buddy left his office window open for the first time in two years yesterday, because of the lack of traffic smoke and noise. Apparently fresh air in the City is a rare thing indeed.

    So what if the buses suck, the tubes suck, the taxis are too expensive? Just Segway your way around London!

  201. Do the math again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And work on your reading comprehension skills as well.
    Poster said the difference in time for traveling 5 miles via Segway and walking was 20 minutes. Note that the Segway, rated at 12mph manages a 5 minute mile, or 25 minutes to travel 5 miles. A person taking 45 minutes (20 minutes more) to walk 5 miles is doing a 9 minute mile - between 6 and 7 mph - pretty quick walking, but no where near a run.

    Personally, I think the Segway as a general purpose vehicle is pretty useless - limited to relatively flat well maintained roads, etc.

    Now where is my Buck Rogers (as in Armageddon 2419 - the original book) anti-gravity belt so I can move around at about 20 mph - and not have any bulky vehicle to worry about?

  202. Segway fundamental filisophical flaws by chubso · · Score: 1

    Segway has some fundamental flaws, the biggest one is that standing still in one place is better for people than walking. It is harder on knees and legs to stand still in one spot than to walk. I think it is a big piece of equipment with little real use. Hello pet rock, CB radios and, oh yes, personal computers.

  203. The perfect place for a Segway by K8Fan · · Score: 1

    I go to a lot of trade shows. Trying to cover the entire floor and see everything at a huge show like Comdex is exhusting. At the end of the day, my feet resemble hamburger.

    At this year's Consumer Electronics Show, the first Segway purchaser was there, on his Segway. I wanted one so badly, if they had been renting for $100 a day, I would have done it.

    Yeah, it's a niche market, but so are those little sit-down scooters - and I did rent one of those on the 4th day of a previous CES.

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  204. Segway-jacking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step off or I'll pop a cap in your ass! Nah I will stick to a bike, they cost alot less and keep me in shape. How lazy can we become? Uhhh.. its too much work to walk 75' to my mailbox.. take the segway.

  205. H2 is NOT a just Tahoe with ugly cladding by jason99si · · Score: 1

    Now we're really off topic! But recently on Car and Driver Television (on TNN?) they did a comparison of the H2 vs. the Hummer.

    The conclusion was the H2 provided 80% of the capability of the Hummer, at 50% of the price.. with much more comfort.

    The Hummer folks kept a very close eye on GM to make sure they weren't tarnishing their name.

    1. Re:H2 is NOT a just Tahoe with ugly cladding by irix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      recently on Car and Driver Television (on TNN?) they did a comparison of the H2 vs. the Hummer

      Don't buy too much into shows like "Car & Driver television" (do they ever give a car a bad review?).

      The conclusion was the H2 provided 80% of the capability of the Hummer

      The H2 has nothing in common with the H1 besides the name, and the H2 is based off of the Tahoe. No wide wheel base, run-flat capability, engine snorkel. Plastic bumper bits and body cladding. Heck, even a locking rear differential is optional on the H2.

      at 50% of the price.. with much more comfort.

      No argument there. The H2 is a "luxury SUV" with heated leather seats, sunroof, etc. - something the H1 never claimed to be.

      The Hummer folks kept a very close eye on GM to make sure they weren't tarnishing their name.

      I call BS here. GM purchased the naming rights from AM General. They took a Tahoe and made the body look as much like the H1 as possible - even fake air intakes and fake lift hooks. Expect to see more of this in the future - the public assoicates the "Hummer" with a quasi-exotic military vehicle. Now that GM has the name they can re-body existing vehicles and call them a "Hummer", hoping to market them on the name recognition. Which is exactly what they have done with the H2.

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  206. The Specs Should Be... by JavaJoint · · Score: 1

    When I first heard about the Segway, I was interested for a day or so. Then I was hit by a bout of pragmatism.

    My issues with it:

    • price should be $500
    • weight should be no more than 25 pounds. I should be able to carry this as easily as my mountain bike.
    • too big for sidewalks, too slow for the street. Damn right San Francisco banned these. Been downtown at lunch hour lately? (even with all the layoffs...) Getting pegged with 80 pounds of Segway + weight of rider at 12 mph sounds like broken bones to me.
    • Curbs? Hello? Wheelchair ramps are not as universal as one would think.

    The Italians, and Europe in general, seem to have more of a handle on local transport. I've seen so many scooters in England, France, and Germany... Check out ItalJet Fills a nice niche between Bicycle and Motorcycle. (no, I don't work for 'em) .. hmm 90mpg, can lock it up, easy to park, and I won't be tempted to take it on a twisty mountain road (like a nice Kawasaki Ninja) and kill myself on a canyon run! Oh, and I could buy two of them for the price of one Segway...

  207. High mileage SUV by toybuilder · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the Ford Hybrid Escape which will get about 35-40 mpg in the city. It's due out in 2004. You can read about it here.

    Granted, it's not a full-size SUV. But it's still much better than 21 mpg of the conventional Escape.

  208. Note to Segway inventor: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time do your homework before bringing a new product to market. If you want to compete with the bicycle, you have to price it in the same range. Maybe if you'd done that first, you'd realize you can't compete with the bike because you can't make any money selling them for that price given what they cost. Then we'd never have had to put up with all your stupid PR and lame ideas. This thing is nothing more than a toy for people with too much money.

    Make it an even $1k and I'll THINK about buying one, maybe. Maybe if I lived on the ground floor, never had to take it up stairs, and had my head up my ass!

  209. segway by fohidac · · Score: 1

    At any point does the article say the maybe people don't want one because they don't want to look like a prick?

  210. Urban change - Re:Goddammit! by DrRobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no doubt that the many urban problems you cite exist and we need to solve them, however the urban changes that would make the Segway even remotely useful (combined residential/business, paths, etc) would also make all other common forms of transportation equally useful. Any city designed to accomodate a Segway would probably be better suited to a bicycle (smaller, greater range, more flexible). A little planning on the part of individuals would also help... if you don't want to spend 2+ hours in traffic, plan your work and residence so that you don't have to... The Segway is simply unrelated to urban problems. I already have the better Segway... a Litespeed bicycle... of course it costs about the same :(

  211. Damn it, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    On a bicycle, easily. On foot, at half that speed easily.
    Wow congrats! You are more physically fit than most Americans, and you are not handicapped or injured in any way.

    I'll give you a tip. You don't "win" the argument by proving that you don't feel any need for a segway. The person is not claiming everyone should need or want one. They are saying it has legitimate uses for people, and the hostility towards this possiblity is really unnecessary.
    As an added bonus, you wouldn't be a fat lump looking stupid standing on a self balancing Jetsonesque piece of kitch.
    I'm sure bicycles looked silly when they first were starting to be used. I know cars did... and at the time they were considered redundant and only for the wasteful rich.
    1. Re:Damn it, stupid by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      I'll give you a tip. You don't "win" the argument by proving that you don't feel any need for a segway. The person is not claiming everyone should need or want one. They are saying it has legitimate uses for people, and the hostility towards this possiblity is really unnecessary.

      Apparently no one else feels the "need" for it, either.

      Welcome to the free market. There's no demand for a souped up scooter. The inventor should have made this a souped up wheelchair. I'm sure a lot of people that have accessibility needs would easily hand over $5000 for one.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  212. If they want us to buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they want us to buy the Segway, it better be under $400. The current price $4000 is half the price of a car with a 100K miles + 10 years warranty.

  213. Nah. But give me a Segue, err, Segway, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll ride it around while wearing my sweet leather trenchcoat and shades. I'll make it look COOL and Matrix-esque!

    Well, probably not, but I won't look like a dorky fat guy on a short scooter. I figure it'd save on gas though, so I'd ride it around quite a bit, thus, getting it out in the public's mind.

    Yes! For the price of on Segway, you can have me advertise your Segway!

  214. Reasons it will/has failed... by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    Expecting the SHT to have cities designed for it is the stooopidest thing I've ever heard. People are lazy! People can walk, ride a bike, a moped, a motor scooter, motorcycle or take the bus even but instead choose to use cars even to drive 1 mile to the store even though these alternatives are all cheaper than a SHT. It's just too expensive and even so, I doubt they would sell anywhere that doesnt have mostly warm weather for the entire year. For $5k I could buy a motorcycle that would have about as much storage area, but would have much greater range and speed. I don't see a market for them.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  215. Re:Segway. Nothing to see here. by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    2 SMALL adults and 3 SMALL kids, unless you equate "can fit" with "fit comfortably."

    Try finding some friends who are over 6'2" tall and see how well they fit.

    I'm sure I would agree with you if I were a midget (under 6'2").

    ~D

  216. They should use that mentality for everything... by bazmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The car needs money, and gas: "It's easy, just get up and walk. You'll make it there eventually, and think of the health benefits!!!"
    The laundry needs doing: "You just buy 3 gallons of Febreeze, and forget about washing. Clothes can only get so dirty, and let's face it, brown looks much better on you than white."

    The Segway is $5,000 for about $500 of advantegeous value: "Just walk. Or bike, or blade, or skate. Sure, you may not like the exercise and work now... but would you do it to save $5,000?"

    I hope Kamen felt terrible when he said that crap about the battery and that guy's response to the weight. If he used the mentality of "just do it yourself" to combat low battery life and heavy weight, we should use the menatility of "just do it yourself" to screw the Segway and lose some weight cycling/walking.

  217. See the Fat Guy from Seattle on Segway's Site!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the Book of Seg guy and his plump wife featured on segway.com http://www.segway.com/segway/personal_beth.html

  218. The segway was a bad idea in the first place. by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Informative

    The thing was over priced, with a TON of hype for what turned out to simply be an electric scooter with a fancy control mechanism. Big deal. Get yourself an electric Razor scooter and forget the over-hyped, over priced thing.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  219. /. fanboys at work again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another great example of /. fanboys hyping some infeasable product as big news.

    Hi, here's a $5000.00 thing which replaces walking short distances.

  220. So... by TwitchCHNO · · Score: 1

    Would this be considered a Segway Fault?

    --
    ___________________________
    I'm not a geek, but I play one on TV.
  221. Re:See the Fat Guy from Seattle on Segway's Site!! by ptorrone · · Score: 1

    you can read all about my weight (5, 11" - 167lbs) my bmi is 23, which is more than healthy-- all over at my site. the pics on the segway site were taken when pre-owning a segay (at training) since then we've both lost tons of lbs, we've been using the extra time we have each day to exercise, also i used to sit in a car for an hour per day, now i do not. you can read about this here http://www.bookofseg.com/weight

    of course only anonymous posts would ever post something like this.

  222. People don't want to look stupid by krylan · · Score: 1

    Imagine how much of a jack-ass you'd like riding one these things.

    If they could make a hover wheelchair like Dr. Xavier from the X-men, then THAT my friends, would be marketable.

    --

    ...I could be wrong

  223. Re:Segway. Nothing to see here. by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    How about 2 6'0" 200lb people in the back seat and the same in the front. Not everyone needs one of those SUV (Supid User Vehicles). Yes it was comfortable, and we drove from Florida to Michigan and back, and no one bitched about having to ride in the back seat.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  224. Damn near a Thomas Edison? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
    So he nicks other peoples ideas, and cheats them on deals?>p>Damn, I'm sad he's struggling...

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  225. How long until someone steals it? by phamlen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I admit that I'm looking at this from a NY perspective but...

    How do you lock the dang things? Can someone just hop on your Segway and drive off? Even if you lock it, can't someone (according to the article) "just lift it into a truck"? And if you got a bicycle lock, where would you attach it?

    Considering that, in NYC, most delivery people carry heavy chains and locks and drive beat-up bikes so no one steals them, I can't imagine that the lifespan of a Segway on the New York City streets would be much more than 5 minutes.

    "Hey, guys! Come down and see my cool Segway. Hey, where did it go??!!!"

    1. Re:How long until someone steals it? by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      hiya,

      i lock mine up all the time all over my area. i wrote about it here: http://www.bookofseg.com/secure.html

      it can be locked witha bike lock (i use one). if it were stolen, it would not work. a 64 bit encoded key is needed, segway will not send out a key unless you prove who you are. it would be useless to steal one, and if mine were stolen (so far 80 days owning one, used for 300+ miles) there's insurance for stuff like theft, just like anythibg else. feel free to email me if you need any more info, or if anyone is in my area, let me know. i'm not worried about anyone stealing the ht more than i'm worried about my car getting stolen.

      cheers,pt

    2. Re:How long until someone steals it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quote from your link: the segway ht i series weighs well over 70lbs, without the activation key you'd literally need to drag it around.

      What, you can't lift 70 lbs?

      Oh... wait. If you actually need a segway to get around, you probably can't. Geek I may be, but I can still heft a body over my shoulder...

    3. Re:How long until someone steals it? by burns210 · · Score: 1
      the key has a rediculously high encryption, i believe it is 1024. well, maybe that isn't rediculous, but it would be more hassle than its worth.

      You can lock the segway up through the wheel spokes, or around the main bar. I assume it would lock just fine around any bike rack... as it is a beefy wire that wraps around something.

    4. Re:How long until someone steals it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than one delivery d3wd has told me their collection of chains and locks cost more than their bike.

  226. Physics is a bitch... by Pii · · Score: 1
    ...but it's the law!

    Things are what they are... Pretending things are different from what they are doesn't change the reality. It just makes you a Democrat.

    (Yeah, yeah... Cheap shot...)

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  227. one word: Vespa by sabernar · · Score: 1

    Buy a freakin' vespa! Yeah, you ride them in the street, but they go fast, are cheaper than a Segway, and you can ride them MUCH farther.

    Why would anyone want the limitations of a Segway over the freedom of a scooter?

  228. Hell is other people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They think the same thing about you, because your choice does affect others ... it is not just your business.

  229. it's just a fancy electric scooter by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 1

    Why exactly would someone buy the thing. All that it is is an electric scooter that costs like 4500 dollars. If I wanted to ride around the sidewalks on an electric scooter I could have bought one two years ago for less that 1000 dollars and be riding it every day. Sure my low tech electric scooter would have wheels in an inline configuration whereas the Segway has them in a single axle configuration but that hardly makes it worth the extra 3500 dollars. It certainly is no revolution in transportation since I believe the idea of electric scooters have been around a very long time. Most of the last century I believe. This Dean Kamen is apparently a student of P.T. Barnum's no doubt.

  230. Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another important consideration is the scalability of the business. Google can just slap some more servers together and put them online. A manufacturing facility does not work that way, there are many specialized machines, not ten thousand nearly identical ones. You obviously dont have a great concept of how manufacturing works.

  231. Rent-a-Segway? by frdmfghtr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Paul Saffo, a director at the Institute for the Future in Menlo Park, California, describes a ride on a Segway as a "gas" but adds that the machine "costs three times what a consumer device should cost, and it's about 40 pounds too heavy."

    Agreed--I'd love to buy one, but not for much above $1000.

    What if they were available some other way besides Amazon (the only place I've seen them available)? Start small (too late for that) and open a few Segway dealerships in places likely to draw business. Perhaps have a Rent-a-Segway in spring break places like Daytona Beach or Lake Havasu, where college kids with money to burn in a week would go Segway-cruising up and down the strip.

    My thoughts...

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  232. What problem/need does IT satisfy? by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Here is a classic case of a product without a market. What need or problem does this device satisfy? Even the US postal service has decided that it won't work in their applications - limited range, and letter carriers ending up frozen because they aren't walking.

    I got to see one at the International Auto show in NYC two years ago, and it drew a small crowd; nothing like the crowd the Hummer and H2 drew.

    For a few hundred dollars this thing could supplement a bike purchase for your kid, but for thousands of dollars it better be able to do more than replace a bicycle.

    -ted

    1. Re:What problem/need does IT satisfy? by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      >>but for thousands of dollars it better be able to do more than replace a bicycle. yah, it replaced my car.

  233. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How sad has the human species become now that we have to have an idiotic looking little contraption to take us around at 15mph instead of using our feet or a bicycle, both of which would provide us with exercise that our bodies need?? If I saw someone on one of these things I would probably start laughing. I would rather ride in a wheelchair (no offense at all to any handicapped people).

    Yeah I am going to pay months and months of salary so I can get NO exercise! YAY!

    1. Re:Seriously... by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      i replaced a car by using the segway ht, not a bike or walking. i still do both, actually more since getting a segway ht.

      cheers,
      pt

  234. It will fail-infruastructure is not designed forit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never understood what they hype was about.
    The infrastructure is already built and
    on higheways it is not as convenient as cars.
    On the other hand it is not that convenient
    in places where many people walk.

    I would rather bet on some kind 'use as you go'
    1-person small electric cars for cities.

    But first we need to have complete
    automatic driving control so cars can
    return 'home' when not in use.
    It would also be good for old/disable/no-license
    people. And great if they can follow 'owner'
    after his/her cellphone.

  235. It'll catch on. Paradigms are like that. by TerraFORM · · Score: 1

    As others have said, it's a combination of infrastructure, cost, and perceived usefulness. The word 'perceived' means just that--there exists an ingrained love affair with the automobile that isn't easily usurped. I believe that Segway Corp. has failed only in their advertising and promotion.

  236. What I see with the success of the segway by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    Is 250 million super fat americans rolling around on 2 wheels.

  237. Scooters cost $50 (EOM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No really. I said EOM.

  238. Man that's brave by darnok · · Score: 1

    > They should give these things away to people that
    > buy Hummer H2s (read:idiots).

    Think of all those pro wrestler Hummer-drivers who could come knocking on your door. Not that I think they're likely to hurt you, but when they hear about it the police will be onto you as a suspected steroid dealer faster than you can say "Crisco makes the cheapest body oil"

  239. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the low end bicycle market is $200-$500. Which actually makes the low end Segway an order of magnidude more expensive, but notice all the people here saying "It's competitively priced to a bike."

  240. nonsense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard times for Segway? Never!!!! You know, I liked
    my "it" so much, I sawed off both my legs and duct taped my body to my Segway so that I'll never need to walk again!! (big grin) Thanks, Segway!

  241. I can see a market by darnok · · Score: 1

    The consulting agency I work for has several "business managers", whose role is largely to travel around the city to our various customer sites, scope out new work if it's there and keep tabs on the work that's currently being performed. These guys are in cars probably 50% of the time, and probably close to 1/2 that is spent trying to find a car parking space in a crowded city.

    Most consulting companies of any size have several people who do this sort of role. They might be called "account managers" or something similar.

    Rather than walking everywhere (city covers too large an area for this to be practical), or riding bikes (not an option when you're wearing a business suit and there's no place to shower at the other end), Segways would be a viable alternative and could possibly shave up to an hour a day in car parking time for each of these guys. At the hourly rates they get paid, that's not an inconsequential sum of money.

    Furthermore, a lot of the people that these guys meet would tend to be impressed rather than scornful - it could well reinforce an impression of "a go-ahead company not afraid to try something new" in the minds of the people that we want to impress. Don't get me wrong - *I* think they look pretty silly, but I can see that certain corporate types would be fairly impressed.

  242. Anyone remember the Sinclair C5? by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    It was a recumbent bicycle encased in a fibreglass moulding, "invented" in Britain by Sir Clive Sinclair in the early 80's, and got very similar publicity to the Segway. In fact, when I saw all the media hype about "it" and Steve Jobs saying cities will be re-designed around it I really got powerful deja-vu.

    Needless to say it bombed. The reason being that it was only going to appeal to people who would probably buy bicycles or maybe mopeds to travel around in, but it was overpriced, dangerous in heavy traffic (too low to be seen by trucks) and made you look like a loon.

    Personally, I thank god the Segway is popping its clogs. At a time when obesity is a rapidly growing problem brought about by lack of exercise, if they caught on we'd all end up as terminal lard-buckets.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  243. S - A - R - C - A - S - M by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    > If they just stuck a seat on it everything would be different.

    The original post was meant to be FUNNY. It was a SARCASTIC remark. He didn't mean it seriously.

    Jeezuz - you really have to spell it out some times!

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  244. Corner groceries by sulli · · Score: 1
    What?!? You don't have a corner grocery? Of course you don't, your city hasn't been redesigned yet.

    It's because my city (San Francisco) wasn't redesigned in the first place by idiot zoning boards that demand only residences in the residential areas that I have not one but five corner groceries within two blocks of my home, and a nice supermarket just beyond.

    I'll admit, I don't live in the suburbs, because to do so would probably lead me to throw myself under the nearest moving SUV.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  245. put "segway accident" in Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry I laughed at someone's misfortune, but the photo of the segway rider laying on the ground while paramedics attend to him is too much. Of course I'd like to mention that I did in fact break a leg in a bicycle accident, after I started up after waiting for a School Bus to allow passengers to exit. So, having been there, accidents on contraptions, I get to laugh.
    P.S. If Amazon will send me one of these Segway Scooters, free of charge, then I will stop posting on Slashdot about the "segway accident" and killing off their market of rich, know-it-all people to buy the damn things. Just send the Scooter to "Anonymous Coward" care of Slashdot. All of us Anonymous Cowards will take turns riding it.

  246. I rode one, and... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I'd get one in a minute, but at half the price. I own four bicycles (road, mountain, city, touring) and a car, and riding this thing, even just indoors, was like nothing else. You can't do it justice in a description. You pretty much have to see the goofy childlike look on everyone's face when they run around on it. The only close feeling is like you just sprouted wings. I train and travel on my bicycles, and am on them any time I can be, but if I have to be presentable after heading out over suburban/small city terrain, I'd rather have a scooter. Reasonably efficient, cleaner, and you smell better. But why have this 8 foot long contraption sticking out fore and aft when all you need are the wheels. I've spent as much as a grand ten years ago on my best bike, and would spend two grand on a Segway tomorrow. But not five. As for the cool/nerd debate, when I was a kid (60s), being seen on a skateboard was one of the easiest ways to get pummelled on principle. Then the 90s happened and voila - instant coolness. Taste is fickle.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  247. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Note I said "better", not "high end" :) I'm thinking mainly of the middle-aged "I like my bike but it's getting to be too much work" market, who might pay several hundred (because they're also old enough to think in terms of durable quality), but certainly not several thousand (because at that price, you might as well get a car).

    Also of the upper-middle-class teen market that are fad-followers and may be able to save up a few hundred, or get an indulgent parent to cough up -- lots of these kids wouldn't be caught dead riding a bike, because it's not trendy enough. Spritz up the Segway's appearance to catch that market's eye, cuz they aren't going to buy anything that LOOKS like "old people".

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  248. Plus it's a really dumb idea to begin with by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It was a product cooked up in some VCs office between crack hits that 'sounded like a good idea at the time'.

    1 - Build Segway
    2 - ?
    3 - Make profit

    Sadly the corridors of dot com companies that were supposed to be its roads all collapsed and burned.

    So there is zero logical point to owning one of these 4,000 dollar toys.

  249. 6 billion versus 2 million by acidboy · · Score: 1

    "I started thinking," he says, "there are 6 billion pairs of feet walking around this planet, and there are about 2 million people in the United States in wheelchairs - 6 billion versus 2 million, 6 billion versus 2 million." He never finishes the thought, but the conclusion seems obvious.

    Yes, it does. There are 6 billion people on this planet, and 2 million of them need a wheelchair. There are 6 billion people on this planet, how many of them need a Segway? The implied comparison of 6 billion against 2 million hightlights in the most ironic way possible the hyperbolic fantasy that is Mr. Kamen's world.

  250. Huh?? by Gimpin · · Score: 1

    Screw that...buy a Rascal

    --
    "Simon Says, Fuck You" - George Carlin
  251. My Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mission:
    To provide the American household and low-income communities throughout the world with safe, low cost, low emission transportation through a hybrid-electric LSV (Low Speed Vehicle).

    Business Description:
    The company, Mobility by Arianna is in the business of producing and selling low cost, low emission LSVs. Our first LSV is the "Windigkeit", named after the German word for windiness. Appropriately named for the quietness of the vehicles operation and associated feeling of freedom. We have coined the phrase: "When driving the Windigkeit the only sound is the wind at your ear". With a 48-inch by 96-inch footprint, it is very easy to drive, and more importantly these days, to park. This (4) passenger vehicle has a proven efficiency of 80 mpg and a range of 200 miles per refill at 25 mph. Powered by a very small gasoline-electric generator that replenishes the (4) 12vdc batteries and drives the electric motors.

    The initial prototype and current model tests have shown proven reliability and vehicle efficiency. This vehicle proves our competitive edge in providing an extremely low cost 4-passenger vehicle. Which is capable when sold in high quantities of transporting the more than 2 million Americans who are teenagers, the elderly, and the environmentally conscious. This vehicle will be in the form of a finished vehicle or an optional kit for Americans to purchase that complies with all LSV safety requirements, allowing travel anywhere on public city streets with a posted speed limit of 35 mph or less. We plan to retail this vehicle kit for under $5,000.00 and have a return of 10% net profit within the next 5 years.

    The U.S. is leading the world in increased spending for alternative transportation. Hydrogen infrastructure and fuel cells are a stated goal of the president. The past three years have seen significant increase in public interest for low emission vehicles. Between Dec 1999 and March 2001, Honda Motor Company sold a total of 8,531 Honda Insights, a hybrid-electric ICE (Internal Combustion Engine), in the U.S. The 2002 MSRP was $19,080. GEM had sold 7,000 neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) for $10,000 by the end of 2002. This leaves a large opportunity for extremely low cost vehicles. There is a demand that we can fill.

    Our vehicle will significantly advance progress of alternative vehicle market penetration through low cost. The key to our success is the use of available fuel and materials to limit implementation costs, thereby mitigating the risks related to new technology development. Our success is a result of using readily available gasoline electric generators and electric drive assemblies. The vehicle body is made of high quality metals, wood, and composite material. The kit will require: The purchase of (4) 12 vdc auto batteries, the installation of wheels, generator kit, and simple attachment of the roof to the vehicle body.

    The LSV market niche limits our exposure to competition from large and small automobile manufacturers. Our ability to carry 4 passengers at a 200-mile range limits our exposure to other LSV manufacturers, which use only batteries. These LSVs typically have a range of 80 miles and need to be recharged for eight hours. Additional market risks include the following. Large auto-manufactures joining the extreme low cost vehicle market. Significant changes in LSV safety and operational regulations that aim to increase the difficulty of registration of LSV model types in California, or other states.

    The company is currently seeking a location for a kit packaging/distribution plant within the northern California region for the current production model. In addition we are seeking financial support through federal and state grants to cover operations and marketing expenses. Current financial support relies on personal investments of the management team. Our quarterly cash flow expenses are $37,000, with income of $17,500. This includes initial yearly production of (12) vehicles with a two-year projected annual increase of 100% per year followed by an annual increase of 50%.

    Monterey Gardiner established the company in 2002, he has gathered a diverse group of teammates. His team has a background in hydrogen fuel cell technology, robotics, vehicle power plant engineering, state vehicle regulation, design and testing of aircraft structures.

    The future is bright. Plans for 2004 include the use of revenue from outside investors to fund rental of manufacturing space for small-scale distribution within California. We will begin marketing directly to the customer and through limited retail stores throughout California and the nation. 2007 to 2010 begins development of a CNG based hybrid-electric platform. The CNG development will follow the transition to a full production vehicle model. The main challenge at this stage will be the ability to adequately store the CNG, without impacting vehicle performance, or customer satisfaction.

    Between 2011 to 2015 revenue from the CNG based models will be used to fund the development of a hydrogen based ICE (internal combustion engine). 2015 and on will see the final stage of the business development through the use of a Fuel Cell configuration in place of the hydrogen ICE power plant. The timing of all development will depend on the ability to meet the following goals:
    v Reach a sustainable level of market saturation,
    v The ability to optimize the vehicle platform,
    v Maintain sufficient power and weight ratio

    Name recognition will be gained through a strong marketing plan. Advertising in newspaper, television, press releases, event sponsorships, and community outreach programs, and trade shows. The initial prototype will be unveiled at the 2003 Bibindum challenge. Followed by possible test-drives at California fuel cell partnership in Sacramento. We are also working to introduce the vehicle to car sharing programs in the Northern California bay area region.

    We at Mobility by Arianna are excited about the future of low emission vehicles and are particularly excited about the " Windigkeit". It truly provides a needed alternative to the current offering of high priced, high pollution vehicles being offered. This high value vehicle provides snappy performance, without the high cost. We will provide the critical mass required to evolve the vehicle market from advanced technology vehicles for a select few to anyone who truly wants to own one.

    any serious comments may be directed to

    mrgardiner@cheerful.com, altavista.net finally tanked.
    -Monterey

  252. Re: no protection from the elements by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Another big problem I saw with the Segway is the lack of protection for the rider from the elements. Maybe in sunny California, this isn't a huge issue. But in much of the country, a big attraction to driving a vehicle around for even short delivery-type trips is the shelter it provides from the rain or snow. You get in, close the doors and windows, and you even have a climate controlled environment with heater or air-conditioning.

    Any type of motorized transportation I'm paying thousands for should offer some of this, IMHO.
    Otherwise, as many people pointed out - why not save all the money and ride a bike, or even a small scooter/moped?

  253. Re: no protection from the elements by ptorrone · · Score: 1

    i seem to be fine in seattle with my segway ht, i wear a coat and hat if it's raining, that's about all there is to it, it's really not a problem. i also take a car, car pool, bike or work from home too. it's about choices and less car trips total per year. if you can bike to work great, many of us can't for many reasons-- so it's car or something else, i use a segway, gave up a car, saving over $600 per month. it's all relative, so far i've been pleased, results may vary.

  254. Where to begin... by Frankenmoro · · Score: 1
    Pollution could be stopped today.

    How exactly are you going to stop pollution today? Ah, yes, that's right, by stopping INDUSTRY! How could I forget? See, you're not anti-pollution, you're anti-capitolism (ooooooh, what a great evil, huh?).

    The Segway obviously doesn't pollute.

    Ummmm... Think again. It uses electricity, that means you have to get that electricity from somewhere, so where would that be? Well, since most of the power plants in the world are coal-burning, that means that your electricity is probably coming from a coal-burning power plant. Since coal-burning power plants are more polluting than regular combustion engines, and less effecient, then I figure your precious non-polluting Segway is at least as polluting as a car.

    Of course, if you freak-ass greens hadn't stopped nuclear power cold, then you would have a relatively pollution free source of electricity. For now, store the rods, or turn them into bullets and armor, and when we have our space elevator, we'll jetison the whole lot into the sun.

    50 years? That's confortably out of your frame of reference, isn't it? "I won't worry, they'll have it solved in 50 years."

    Actually, that's what we call forward thinking and a belief in the ingenuity of man. If you could stop screaming "NOOOOOOOOOO, YOUR DESTROYING THE PLANET" and start trying to solve the problem, then perhaps we would have a solution, and sooner than 50 years... But all you can do is obstruct.

    Ridiculous.

    Actually, I find your argument ridiculous. It makes no sense... but you won't listen long enough to hear why.

  255. A few years too late by Myco · · Score: 1

    I had 5 grand to blow, but I bought a RealDoll instead.

    Well, which would you choose? ;)

    (P.S. No, not really. It's funny, laugh.)

  256. schedule by frankie_guasch · · Score: 1

    1.- show segway to some rich people who love it
    2.- report how they loved to the media
    3.- end user notices it's useless and expensive
    4.- not profit

  257. How to save Segway by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    Price it at $1200 planning on dropping the price by 33% over 2 years.

    For $5,000 there is little economic incentive.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  258. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't replace a car with a segway so its a poor argument.

    Its a 2nd car.

    WOuldn't it make more sense to buy a fast scooter? Take a look at this:
    http://www.hondamotorcycles.com/scooters/model.asp ?ModelName=Reflex&ModelYear=2003&ModelId=NSS25 0L3

    Same price, but better range, better service, you can sell it when you get tired of it?

    Or how about a nice bicycle:
    http://www.raleighusa.com/items.asp?dept id=5&itemi d=27

    Its 1/10 the price, and you'll get 15 years of use.

  259. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Degrees · · Score: 1

    I think you hit the nail on the head. I could see a lot of really old baby boomers going for the eco-friendly, way-cooler-than-a-wheelchair Segway, if and only if it didn't cost as much as their college tuition.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  260. Re:In other words, it isn't a product for most peo by Reziac · · Score: 1

    At $500, I think the Segway would rapidly become ubiquitous, both among the middle-aged who can't pedal up hills anymore, and among teens looking for the coolest new toy.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  261. segway in seattle.. by ptorrone · · Score: 1

    now that the thread has "cooled" down. if you're in the seattle area, feel free to send me an email and i'll arrange a demo (as in you can try my segway ht).

    cheers,
    pt
    pt@bookofseg.com

  262. NAVEWEiSS iS AS iNNOVATiVE AS A SEGWAY! by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    (Insert bombastic superlatives here)

    You can't tell how much I love myself..
    BTW: I am looking for a girlfriend. If you are the lucky one, you'll get to ride my "segway". ;)

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  263. Haggar by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Say.. are you a girl?

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
    1. Re:Haggar by haggar · · Score: 1

      Sorry to disappoint you: Haggar as in Haggar the Horrible. I guess I misspelled it the first time.

      So, I am not the Haggai from HaArets, rather I am a guy living somewhere in HaTsafon, just like Haggar.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:Haggar by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

      That's good to know. I live in Hamerkaz.. although HaTsafon looks like a great place to move to. As magical and interesting as the capital, but less dangerous (or not?)

      --
      Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
      Nave H. Weiss
  264. Missing the POINT! by ogewo · · Score: 1

    You guys are comparing the Segway to all current forms of transportation but only listing the drawbacks of it. Yes a bike is cheaper and lighter, but not easy to go fast (especially in a suit) and though light, still cumbersome to carry anywhere. Yes a scooter/motorcycle is faster, but it is not environmentally friendly, its loud, and requires a good deal of maintenance. NEITHER of them can be used INDOORS!!! The Segway will literally replace walking in many circumstances!

    You could segway out of your apartment, onto the elevator, down the street all the way to work, into the elevator, and park it in your office. That's Dean Kamen's vision for the Segway.

    $5,000 is very expensive relative to walking, which my legs provide at the cost of a good nights sleep and a hearty breakfast, but its nothing relative to possible saved car payments, insurance, gas, maintenance. If you're in a situation where you have access to more than one car or don't really need a car at all the Segway could end up saving you money. I can't wait until a Segway is financially viable for me.

    http://www.bookofseg.com has really opened my eyes to all of this. Everyone should check it out.

    Another strong point against the Segway is the gayness factor. At first people on Segways will look goofy to us but with time we'll get used to it. Men in a VW New Beetle/Mini Cooper, general computer nerdery, pocket protectors, all have become accepted with time. It wouldn't even be an issue for a generation born with Segways in use. If you won't use a Segway because you're worried about how you'd look then you have a serious image problem and need to grow up. It's people like you that keep the penis enlargment spam companies in business.

    A Segway for me? Yes please!

  265. If it's such a bad product, why would it be stolen by mulp · · Score: 1

    "6. Will it get stolen as soon as you park it next to your local trendy cafe? YES"

    I can't figure out your logic.

    If it sucks as badly as you claim, why would anyone steal it????