Slashdot Mirror


The Return of Chewbacca

BrunoC writes "It's official! Peter Mayhew is going to play everyone's favorite wookie once again: Chewbacca is returning in Episode III, currently in pre-production phase. Peter says (quoted from StarWars.com) "I'm delighted to return as Chewbacca, I think his re-appearance in this film is a fitting way to tie the whole saga together, especially for Wookiee fans." Woa! Just for the records: Artoo and C-3PO will be there too! You can read the official annoucement here, at StarWars.com."

493 comments

  1. My God, the spoilers! by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WHY can't the editors realize that there are people who don't want these spoilers, even seemingly minor ones like this?
    It's extremely inconsiderate. Presumably they don't want people to stop reading their site, right?

    1. Re:My God, the spoilers! by inertia187 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spoiler from what? The preview? You're were going to find out sooner or later before the movie.

      A spoiler would be something like, oh say, that Chewbacca is bald in this episode or that he's gay or something. That would be a spoiler...not that there's anything wrong with that.

      If you want a spoiler, how's this - I hear Darth Vader won't be in this episode. How's that for spoiler?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not a minor spoiler, either. I mean, I hardly obsess over this sort of thing, but given that Chewey is one of the most beloved characters in all of Star Wars, I really think this would have gone over better as a surprise.

    3. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a pussy.

    4. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Sancho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are lots of people intentionally avoiding all information about Star Wars. It's not particularly hard to do for movie trailers and television spots, especially if you don't see that many movies to begin with. The first movie that will have the trailer is always highly publicized and you can avoid it fairly easily. After that, you've had warning and can avoid future trailers. For TV, it's a matter of turning it off while the commercial is on. But when you aren't expecting it and slashdot posts a spoiler as a headline (again), then it's kind of hard to avoid it.
      Sure, it's a relatively minor thing, but the editors have taken a lot of flak over the past year or so over posting spoilers in headlines. You'd think they'd learn, especially with something as big as this that a lot of people are intentionally avoiding.

    5. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Zekk · · Score: 1, Redundant

      In all fairness to the editors, it'd be pretty hard to follow Star Wars in the slightest and not hear something this major from somewhere well before the movie is finished. You can uncheck the appropriate boxes or just stay away from this place but most people are bound to find out sooner or later... Slashdot's just doing its best to tell you first, and then repeat it a few times in case you forget....

      --
      .sig
    6. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whine, whine, whine. As if the movie will be any good anyway... :-(

    7. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ok, then the answer to your original comment is, no. Slashdot doesn't want crackpots like you reading Slashdot.

    8. Re:My God, the spoilers! by DA-MAN · · Score: 5, Funny

      A great many bothans died to get this information across, and you dare to complain?!?!

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    9. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Given that Lucasfilm itself publicly announced it well in advance (the movie's not even shooting yet, and is a little over two years away from release), it's obviously not meant to be any kind of surprise (which I acknowledge is not the same thing as saying there aren't any fans who would prefer it to be one). There were certainly spoilers floating around for the first two prequels, but none of them came from Lucasfilm itself; they apparently don't consider this any kind of secret, but rather something for fans to look forward to. I'm confident there will be all sorts of interesting surprises (or at least things Lucas intends to be interesting; let's hope...) that Lucasfilm won't say anything about until the film is released.

    10. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at how StarWars.com politely phrases it "Classic Characters Return" and "Several familiar names return to the Star Wars galaxy." Now, with that information, you don't have any idea who returns. There are many "classic characters" so nothing is given away. People that want more specific information can continue reading.

      Now, look at how Slashdot does it... "The Return of Chewbacca." They couldn't have said it much more directly than that. The mystery is totally gone, even if I didn't want to know.

      Also, look at Padme's Body. Not related to the rest of the comment, but still worth looking at.

    11. Re:My God, the spoilers! by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Agreed!! Lucas has to resort to bringing back old characters and hyping about it so that more people will want to watch the thing.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    12. Re:My God, the spoilers! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Guess what? I heard that Anakin Skywalker will become Darth Vader in ep3!

      OK OK, I got you a spoiler... Ready? Here it goes: You will die alone!

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:My God, the spoilers! by descentr · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's a simple solution to your problem. Turn off the Star Wars Prequels topic in your preferences. The creators of this site put that there for a reason. The editiors can't help you if you won't help yourself.

    14. Re:My God, the spoilers! by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's the characters that made the first Star Wars movies a hit. The characters in general and, specifically, Harrison Ford. If you take out Harrison Ford from the original movies you get, in all honesty, a pretty dull 6 hours of movies. Try to imagine it--he's really the only one with any charisma or humor whatsoever.

      What's been lacking in Episode I and II isn't so much a really cool plot--the plots of the other 3 weren't that impressive, they were just fun to watch due to how the characters played it out. What's been lacking in the first two Episodes is someone(s) who is/are truly humorous and/or charismatic.

    15. Re:My God, the spoilers! by kinnunen · · Score: 1
      Anyone who is trying to avoid all info on Star Wars should disable Star Wars related material from their preferences. Of course spoiler avoidance and/or warnings are still needed, it's basic courtesy.

      IMO this is not a bad case of spoiling, but let me tell you I was absolutely furious when slashdot ran this bit about lone gunmen (X-Files). I still have all stories by Chrisd filtered because of that incident.

    16. Re:My God, the spoilers! by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "WHY can't the editors realize that there are people who don't want these spoilers, even seemingly minor ones like this?
      It's extremely inconsiderate. Presumably they don't want people to stop reading their site, right?"


      You realize that you would have gotten the same info from a TV spot, right?

      You're absolutely right that the editors need to be sensitive *cough*loangunemenaredead*cough*, but this article isn't a call for it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    17. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders: ...and I'm glad of it!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    18. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      That's true, but both headlines are accompanied by photos showing both Threepio and Chewie, indicating even to people who don't read the article that those two characters are returning (though of course, Threepio's return is not really news).

    19. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      One guy writes a cornball song about Chewbacca and he's some great, beloved character? He's an irritant.

      "Chewbacca returns" is scarcely more interesting than "Wedge makes an appearance!"

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    20. Re:My God, the spoilers! by ebbomega · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They sure The Lone Gunmen are Deaded that one...

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    21. Re:My God, the spoilers! by dvdeug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      given that Chewey is one of the most beloved characters in all of Star Wars, I really think this would have gone over better as a surprise.

      What are the odds that it would have been a surprise by the time that Star Wars came out?

    22. Re:My God, the spoilers! by QuasEye · · Score: 1
      *cough*loangunemenaredead*cough*


      Ok, I'm not trying to rip on your spelling, because I really do think that's lame, but this is what came to mind when I thought about what a "Loan Gunman" would be like:

      "Lost another loan to DIE!!!!" (sound of machine guns blazing)


      Yeah, it's stupid, but I found it amusing.

    23. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Dead_Smiley · · Score: 0, Redundant
      You want a spoiler? Here's a spoiler.

      You will die alone!

      How's that for a spoiler? Sorry, I just couldn't resist...

      --
      I know what the Internet is, what the hell is this Interweb business?!
    24. Re:My God, the spoilers! by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 1

      It's hardly a spoiler when the official page lists the information...

    25. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that? If Lucas himself came out and gave the entire plot of the movie, that would be a spoiler, even if it was "official".

    26. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      If Lucas himself came out and gave the entire plot of the movie, that would be a spoiler, even if it was "official".

      i'd call that a book

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    27. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude got fired.. so I dont think he'll be posting anymore stories..

    28. Re:My God, the spoilers! by voixderaison · · Score: 4, Funny
      There are lots of people intentionally avoiding all information about Star Wars.
      There are even more people desperately trying to forget everything they know about Episode I & Episode II, and still more offering to chip in so Lucas can afford a script writer for Episode III.
      --
      Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler. -- Albert Einstein
    29. Re:My God, the spoilers! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      BILLY DEE MAN.

      BILLY DEE WILLIAMS.

      How dare you disrespect him?

      Gotta give credit to mr. calrissian.(or however the fuck you spell it.)

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    30. Re:My God, the spoilers! by AzureLunatic · · Score: 1

      The action figures alone would have spoiled the surprise. Action figures for a movie marketed this big come out how soon?

    31. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are 100% correct. Episode's I and II have been painful to watch in parts. The actor's have been like robots, it's really hard to like them. But the banter between Han Solo and Princess Leia was great in the original!

      The only time you laugh in Episodes I and II is because of how poor some parts of it are. What the hell was with C3PO saying "Oh what a Drag" when he was being dragged along the ground, what a pathetic attempt at humour!

      And what the HELL was with the love thing in EPII? I mean, sure if it had to be there, fine. But they could've made it believable. There was NO chemistry there whatsoever, and some of the lines uttered by Anikin made me cringe they were so corny and lame. Compare that to Han Solo and Princess Leia... I _wanted_ them to get together, they had chemistry, it didn't make me cringe (quite the opposite, I _enjoyed_ watching it).

      Lucas must be on some drugs if he thinks these movies he's cranking out are any good.

    32. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Oh, COME ON - this is hardly a "spoiler." The way I understand it, a spoiler is something that would spoil the entire experience of watching the movie for someone.

      --The last SW movie was almost enough to spoil the whole SW *franchise* for me, it sucked so bad!! Merely telling people that Chewbacca is going to be in the next one is hardly a movie-killer.

      --Now look: bad plot, crappy timing, cringe-worthy dialogue, horrible acting, significant lack of EDITING and NO POINT to doing the movie in the first place - THAT's a movie-killer. Lucas seems all set to release another stinker on the world.

      --I hope I'm wrong... I didn't like the "first episode" movie that much, but I saw it more than once (loved the race, the associated sound effects, Darth Maul, Natalie Portman, Darth Maul [did I mention him already?], Darth Maul's dual saber, R2D2 and C3PO - all made it worth suffering thru the bad parts) and I'll probably watch it again. Contrast with "Episode 2" - despite Natalie's Nipple Scene, I have *absolutely no desire* to ever suffer through THAT dreck again.

      --Compared to ESB, man... I hope Lucas pulls his head out of the sand and lets somebody COMPETENT and SKILLED direct his final offering. Otherwise we'll only have the First Four Movies that are worth watching (and of course the book series.)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    33. Re:My God, the spoilers! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      More crybaby spoiler-nazi propaganda. Why would anyone even consider getting internet access if they wanted to live their lives in a perfect, spoiler-free environment?

      Everywhere you go online you find someone bitching about someone else mentioning how "inconsiderate" someone else is being because they gave away some pitifully small detail about their favorite bit of escapism. Newsflash, this was going to be common knowledge long before you ever even whiffed the scent of a trailer for this movie. Get over it.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    34. Re:My God, the spoilers! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      BILLY DEE WILLIAMS.

      How dare you disrespect him?

      It's not that hard. He was much better in the books than he ever was in the movies, really. Han Solo got boring as hell in the books (except in the Han Solo Trilogy, check it out! It's really *really* good), but Lando really came out.

      I'm willing to concede, however, that Lando Calrissian can probably kick the ass out of the Jedi Luke Skywalker, though. I would've preferred to have seen a lot more byplay between Lando and Han, they really were old friends, after all. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    35. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Pingsmoth · · Score: 1

      Spoilers like this are ruining everything these days. The worst was when pictures, trailers, and cereal boxes announced the return of Gandalf in The Two Towers. Yes I'd read the book several times, but for all those who hadn't, they had a year of waiting ruined by looking at a box of candy.

      I don't even read the back of books anymore. I was nearly finished with the second Harry Potter book when I finally read the back cover and found out exactly who had opened the Chamber of Secrets fifty years ago.

      --
      http://www.walkingtaco.com
    36. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      OK OK, I got you a spoiler... Ready? Here it goes: You will die alone!

      "I'd rather die in my sleep, like my grandfather... Than screaming in terror, like his passengers."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    37. Re:My God, the spoilers! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      " It's not a minor spoiler, either. I mean, I hardly obsess over this sort of thing, but given that Chewey is one of the most beloved characters in all of Star Wars, I really think this would have gone over better as a surprise."

      Probably very true, I think yoda and his big scene in episode two was somthing that surprised/blew lots of people away. I was waiting a long time for that.

    38. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Konowl · · Score: 1

      That's a solution, but not a very effective one, as he will miss ALL stories in Star Wars Prequel. Maybe if they had a Star Wars Spoiler Prequel....

    39. Re:My God, the spoilers! by joeykiller · · Score: 1

      If you take out Harrison Ford from the original movies you get, in all honesty, a pretty dull 6 hours of movies. Try to imagine it--he's really the only one with any charisma or humor whatsoever.

      You know what's even stranger? After Star Wars and Indiana Jones, Harrison Ford has become an actor totally _without_ charisma or humour. Just look at "Six Days Seven Nights" and you'll see what I mean.

      The irony of that is that the de-charismation of Harrison Ford makes him the perfect actor for any of the films in the Star Wars prequel trilogy.
    40. Re:My God, the spoilers! by descentr · · Score: 1

      As Sancho himself said, "There are lots of people intentionally avoiding all information about Star Wars." Due to the wording of his post it sounds as if this is exactly what he wants to do, otherwise I don't think he would have used that point in his argument.

      Obviously a nice solution would be a generic spoiler flag for all topics... but it only works when you use it.

    41. Re:My God, the spoilers! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Ok, I'm not trying to rip on your spelling, because I really do think that's lame, but this is what came to mind when I thought about what a "Loan Gunman" would be like..."

      Heh that's TV's fault. We useta have a used car commercial starring the 'Loan Arranger'...

      Now every time I spell 'lone-something' it becomes loan. Tv rots your brain!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    42. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1
      Ok, here's a spoiler: according to this:

      http://www.starwars.com/databank/droid/c3po/index. html

      C-3PO (See-Threepio) is NOT in Episode III. (it's the only episode that is not grayed out).

      (then again, they might not have had time to gray it out yet).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    43. Re:My God, the spoilers! by jaybird144 · · Score: 1

      I don't think they've updated for Episode III yet...even the big red III at the top of the page is not clickable.

    44. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a fucking life

    45. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, those Jedi should have let Jar Jar Die and take Sebulba along with them for the ride.

      Sebulba, a dog, walking on his hand, and who can be mean, that would have given something to the movies.

    46. Re:My God, the spoilers! by Konowl · · Score: 1

      He's avoiding everything Star Wars for the very thing that happened with this story dammit. He doesn't want to see any spoilers because he already KNOWS there are spoilers in every other story, intentional or not.

      Avoiding all stories in relation to Star Wars to avoid spoilers is effective, it's simply too bad this is the necessary course of action.

    47. Re:My God, the spoilers! by gabec · · Score: 1

      If you're specifically interested in avoiding Star Wars news, simply turn them off in your preferences. You'll never see another SW spoiler on /.! ;)

    48. Re:My God, the spoilers! by I+am+Emmitt+Smith · · Score: 1

      I've said the same thing. There is really no one to identify with in the prequels and that's why people don't get wrapped up in them as much, at least that's my opinion.

      --
      *The Bill of Rights - void where prohibited by law
    49. Re:My God, the spoilers! by nsbucky · · Score: 1

      people still care about star wars after the last 2 movies? now thats surprising...

  2. woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    geeks finally get some nookie!

    oh wait...

  3. Spoiler? by OctavianMH · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uhhhhh on behalf of the 1.5 million geeks WHO DIDN'T WANT TO KNOW THAT, thanks a bunch!

    Time for a padlock on the mousebutton that hits that 'post' button, mayhap?

    Octavian

    --
    "In the end, we all fall back on fiction." -- Lonely Planet
    1. Re:Spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out, I hear Darth Vader is Luke's father. Anyone else getting sick of the spoiler pussies?

    2. Re:Spoiler? by mojowantshappy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you will probably see him pop up in the movie trailers and commercials, so it isn't like it was going to stay a secret for very long.

      --

      This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!

    3. Re:Spoiler? by jerkychew · · Score: 1

      Explain to me how you were going to avoid seeing that news? I've already seen it as a headline on two other websites. I'm sure it will be on Entertainment Tonight/Extra/everything else in the next week or so. The only way you weren't gonna know that is if you unplugged yourself from everything till the next episode hits the theaters.

  4. Please by starseeker · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let Chewbacca take out Jar-jar! Please? I'd pay money to see that.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:Please by kzinti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cool idea! Kinda like a 21st-century successor to Bambi Meets Godzilla - but with lots of cool computer-rendered Jar-Jar-frag-guts as Chewie tears him to bits. "Meeza Gonna DIE!"

    2. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone needs to beat chewy in a holo-chess game. I wonder if he will tear off the eye stalks or the ears first.

    3. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My vote goes for the tongue - like in aliens resurection.

    4. Re:Please by SnuSnu · · Score: 1

      Screaming_Insomniac, from fark.com: Maybe Chewy will bite Jar jar's head off in the first act, that would be sweet!!!!! "Please don't hurt Jar-jar, I love big hairy Wookie AAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    5. Re:Please by oconnorcjo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Let Chewbacca take out Jar-jar! Please? I'd pay money to see that.

      Remember Chewbacca and the 3D chess scene... Perfect way to explain how Chewbacca got his reputation as a "bad sport" when lossing.

      If Lucas needs help finding a way to play it out:

      Have Jar-jar try to take a piece using his tounge and Chewbacca yanks that disgusting tounge up and away from the board causing Jar-jar to clumsily stumble forward and slam his face into the table braking his neck.
      I am usually not a big fan of physical (3 stooges) comedy but The harder Jar-jar flails, twist and stumbles before slamming his face into the table, the better it would be. George you can have this idea for free with my pleasure.
      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    6. Re:Please by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Am I the only person over the age of 14 that *LIKED* Jar-Jar?

      I mean, really!

      He was that as comic-relief, people.... get a grip! It's only a movie!

    7. Re:Please by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      If it's done with Ewoks shot from a cannon, I'll see your bid and double it.

    8. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Am I the only person over the age of 14 that *LIKED* Jar-Jar?

      No, but at least the other two had the decency to just quietly kill themselves.

    9. Re:Please by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    10. Re:Please by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Am I the only person over the age of 14 that *LIKED* Jar-Jar? "

      Whoah! Hey dudes! Check this out! I found one!!

      Man, it's like finding a fart in a jacuzzi.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Please by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt you are the only one. I can't say I liked Jar-Jar all around, but I'm not ashamed to laugh when something he did was funny. I mean, christ, it sure if fun to jump on the "Jar-Jar suxxxxx" bandwagon, but that is a helluva lot more lame than Jar-Jar himself.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    12. Re:Please by black666 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person over the age of 14 that *LIKED* Jar-Jar? Uhmm, yeah! Come on guys, what else has Starwars to offer than some special effects and computer generated characters?

    13. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Chewy takes out Jar-Jar, he should do it by strangling him with his own ears.

    14. Re:Please by rune2 · · Score: 1
      Let Chewbacca take out Jar-jar! Please? I'd pay money to see that.

      Well you don't see Jar Jar in Episode 4 now do you? So as far as I'm concerned it's mission accomplished Chewbacca!
    15. Re:Please by tarzan353 · · Score: 0

      That's not much of a statement- you're going to pay money for it either way, assuming you see the movie.

    16. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my suggestion:

      Jar-Jar misspells "losing", "tongue", and "breaking" in a post to Slashdot.
      Chewbacca, in a fit of pique, bites his head off.

    17. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fog hat.

    18. Re:Please by starseeker · · Score: 1

      Right - I'll see the movie if that's in it. Otherwise, being ripped off twice is plenty, thanks.

      --
      "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    19. Re:Please by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Remember Chewbacca and the 3D chess scene... Perfect way to explain how Chewbacca got his reputation as a "bad sport" when lossing.

      Um, actually, wookies are peaceful, fun-loving sentients. They're not violent at all, except when provoked. Chewie doesn't have a blood-thirsty reputation, Han Solo was fuckin' with the droids. Corellians have been known to do that.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    20. Re:Please by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Am I the only person over the age of 14 that *LIKED* Jar-Jar? Uhmm, yeah! Come on guys, what else has Starwars to offer than some special effects and computer generated characters?

      I think Marty McFly can answer that question for you. "Nothing!"

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    21. Re:Please by Danse · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, much more fun to jump on the "I'm the voice of reason" bandwagon. Jar-Jar deserves every bit of his reputation as an annoying sideshow that detracted from the movie. The fact that he did a few mildly amusing things here and there does not redeem him. Face it, Jar-Jar sucks. People aren't jumping on the bandwagon. Star Wars fans were born on this particular bandwagon and there are only a few that fell off of it. They are to be pitied and scorned.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    22. Re:Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect way to explain how Chewbacca got his reputation as a "bad sport" when lossing.

      "losing" dumbass

  5. I bet the movie still lacks a two major characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    (from http://maddox.xmission.com/)

    Transition and Cohesion.

    Just like episodes 1 and 2, 3 is going to suck ass. Only now, we will get to see even more of the characters we grew to love get crappified by Lucas' new "vision."

  6. Great by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 4, Funny

    And with this Lucas's conversion to the dark side will be complete. Does he really have to shit all over every character from the original trilogy by associating them with the crap he's been making?

    I'd rather see chewbacca appear in a romantic comedy with sandra bullock before the shit that will be Episode III. at least then the plot would most likely make sense to anyone over the age of three.

    1. Re:Great by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      I think that was called Forces of Nature

    2. Re:Great by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Actually after his floppy hair appeared with her in Two Weeks Notice he begged Lucas to cast him in EP3 to restore some credibility to his acting career. Oh wait that was ... nevermind.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Great by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your post is marked funny, but it's actually pretty sad. The new movies were written by a completely different author than the guy who wrote the original Star Wars. My guess is that the Earl of Oxford wrote Star Wars, and Lucas is just some hack.

    4. Re:Great by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I was so appalled by Episode II that I certainly will not be buying a ticket to Episode III. I know its even more apalling that a geek would skip a Star Wars film, but guess what I actually Want to enjoy the films I spend money on.

    5. Re:Great by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Lips' belly button was almost worth it.

      And Yoda's 30 seconds was almost worth it too.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    6. Re:Great by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      You have to guess that Lucas is just some hack? I *know* that Lucas is just some hack. We have several hours of hard evidence for that.

      Here is another spoiler: Anakin turns to *gasp* the dark side and *gasp* becomes Darth Vader... and Chancellor Palpatine is *gasp* the same guy as Emperor Palpatine!

      While I'm at it, you have 2 movies until Obi Wan dies, 4 movies until Anakin dies, and -2 movies until Darth Maul dies (just in case a few people out there are waiting for all three new Star Wars movies are done to see Episode 1).

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    7. Re:Great by Danathar · · Score: 1

      hrrrmph....Whine....Whine, it's not as good as I remembered the original when I was 8, therefore it all sucks...whine...bitch...whine....

      Take a look at the original, the acting sucked there too, which makes the current crop of films look not so bad.

    8. Re:Great by bedurndurn · · Score: 1
      And Yoda's 30 seconds was almost worth it too.

      If only those damn annoying "Who da man? Yoda man" commercials hadn't come out.
    9. Re:Great by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      Naw, it's not that complicated. It's just that back when George Lucas first started making movies, there was actually some editorial oversight. People higher up would slap him down every time he tried to do something stupid.

      Now that he's rich and famous, there's no on around to keep him from making those mistakes. He can just tell anyone who doesn't give in to his every whim to take a hike and there are a dozen people/companies in line waiting to take their place.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    10. Re:Great by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      I'd rather see chewbacca appear in a romantic comedy with sandra bullock...

      Her tits aren't big enough. Now Chewey and Jolene Blalock, that's romance!

  7. Roar roar argh argh by dupper · · Score: 2, Funny
    Grargh urgh gruurgh Grargh gruugh rarrgh raarugh riaogh..... rouggg

    Isn't transliteration fun?

    1. Re:Roar roar argh argh by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Finally! Lucas will have a character that bring his writing to it's fullest potential!

    2. Re:Roar roar argh argh by GreyyGuy · · Score: 1

      I know this is a joke, but that is something I've missed in the new films. Chewbacca talked a lot, but was never translated. What he said was always inferred, which was more immersive I thought. A few other aliens were like that, but none of them are in the new films. Much less interesting storytelling, I think.

    3. Re:Roar roar argh argh by Trull · · Score: 0

      oooargh hhaaa um hu roaaarrr s s ffff roadrhhgh ghf!

      --
      -- NSY - SY OOT - Doric signs on local shop doors.
  8. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every other site (including StarWars.com) labeled it clearly enough that people who didn't wish to know about it, wouldn't bother reading further and see who the cameo would be by. But, here on Slashdot, it's the fricking title, and it's impossible to miss.

    1. Re:I agree by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nerd: We're not allowed to hear spoilers here.

      Triumph: Who wants to hear a spoiler? Here's a spoiler: You will die alone.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  9. Chewy by Bearded+Pear+Shaped · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news they won't be rehiring Harrison Ford!! Because they can't make a Harrison Ford suit!! And because he would have told George Lucas to go **** himself and his Burt Reynolds haircut/scarf around neck under denim shirt!!!

    --
    Who are y oo ?
  10. Remember: by rune2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Always let the wookie win....

  11. Very High Directors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    George Lucas must have been really high to think of Chewbacca. I mean that's where most of these famous directors get all of their good stuff...

    *puff*
    chewbacca
    *puff*
    he's a wookie
    *puff*
    arrr arrr
    that's the sound he makes, write this down

  12. Chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    All you filthy, bearded linux zealots really identify with Chewbacca. This has to be very exciting for you.

    1. Re:Chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this make Linus into Han Solo? We already know that Bill Gates is Darth Vader and Microsoft is the Empire. The real question is whether Paul Allen will train Bill Gates' son into becoming the man that can destroy the Empire.

    2. Re:Chewbacca by tx_mgm · · Score: 1

      We already know that Bill Gates is Darth Vader and Microsoft is the Empire

      uh...he's more like the emperor. we need a lawyer for vader IMO.

      --
      Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
      -Dr. Weird
    3. Re:Chewbacca by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "All you filthy, bearded linux zealots really identify with Chewbacca."

      Well except for the getting physical part.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Chewbacca by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > We already know that Bill Gates is Darth Vader
      > and Microsoft is the Empire ...and Linux is the capitalism-hating group of Rebels who wants to put their own king in place and restore the old monarchy.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    5. Re:Chewbacca by Dossy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always knew Chewbacca was modeled after RMS.

      -- Dossy

    6. Re:Chewbacca by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      You forgot smelly.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Giving the Linus Torvalds Award to the Free Software Foundation is a bit like giving the Han Solo Award to the Rebel Alliance." - Richard M. Stallman

      Actual quote from an article. Whole article here.

    8. Re:Chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple must be Princess Leia.

    9. Re:Chewbacca by stor · · Score: 1

      But Chewie is supposed to be strong.

      He's neither lanky nor fat. He's also not pasty-white.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  13. Who cares? by Paladeen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At this point I am so disillusioned with the new Star Wars films that I couldn't care less who'll feature in Episode III.

    The last two films have been unspeakably bad and I'm extremely skeptical that the next will be any better.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Geeyzus · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I saw Episode I the day it came out. My expectations were low, and it was OK to watch but I wouldn't want to see it again. I didn't even bother seeing Episode II (still haven't seen it, probably won't even watch it when it comes out on TV), and I could care less about III.

      Has nothing to do with MPAA or whatever other crap, the movies just suck, period.

      Mark

    2. Re:Who cares? by deragon · · Score: 1

      Speaking for myself, episode I was a very bad movie, and like you, I did not bother go see episode II. Lucas burned many of his fans with the new releases. Sad story.

      And what is this, all the characters meet long before episode 4? Maybe we will see Luke Skywalker play with Han Solo when they where 4 years old?

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I don't understand why the typical die-hard Star Wars fan keeps coming back for more.

      It's like a woman in an abusive realtionship. She keeps getting beat up, she keeps saying she's going to dump the jerk, but she keeps going back to the trailer park for more. Hilarious :)

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me and my girlfriend went to see Episode I and in the middle we both fell asleep.

      I don't know what to say, it's like most things I guess. 5% have thinking minds, and 95% repeat whatever they hear people say, like whatever they're told to like, and suck d*** of whoever's d*** they're told to suck.

      These movies are a joke.

      How come we can both last through 4 hours of god-awful Gods and Generals but not Episode I?

    5. Re:Who cares? by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      So the 95% who are jumping in the this movie sucked bandwagon are the ones sucking the d***? Thank you for your candour, senator...

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    6. Re:Who cares? by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      At this point I am so disillusioned with the new Star Wars films that I couldn't care less who'll feature in Episode III.

      You know, the sad thing about it is that Lucas has/had such an awesome opportunity to make some really good movies, too. I mean, he has the opportunity here to show why Palpatine is doing what he's doing, to inject a bit of uncertainty into the "good versus evil" simplistic worldview.

      That's one of the reasons I liked Babylon 5 so much: things weren't black and white, but different shades of gray, and the uncertainty that comes from it was used to good effect.

      Lucas could have done the same thing, and might even have done it reasonably well. But nooooo...

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    7. Re:Who cares? by Darth · · Score: 1

      and yet you cared enough to post about it on slashdot...

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    8. Re:Who cares? by cardozo · · Score: 1

      I had the same reaction to Episode I. I had bought the Episode II DVD and let it collect dust until it was the last DVD I had that I handn't watched.

      So, I watched it.

      And I liked it!

      Certainly not as much as Episodes IV and V, but enough to be excited about a Episode II coming out.

      I thought Episode II got back to the roots of the series, especially in the way they used the spirituality of the force, etc.

      Watch Episode II, I think you'll be surprised.

    9. Re:Who cares? by KshGoddess · · Score: 1

      Episode I: The Pod Race I didn't see it until after it had gotten its, erm, 'rave reviews', so no great expectations there.

      Episode II: The 2-d "love" story I wouldn't have seen it if someone else hadn't paid. I saw the actor who played Anakin in "Life as a House" before I saw ep II. I think that most of the wooden characterizations were less through bad acting, and more through bad directing, and terrible dialogue.

      Note to self: Go back in time. Make sure Lucas writtes the entire story at once, then lock away Episodes I-III and VII-IX, hire a decent-but-unknown director, and film the damn things, 3 at once, like LOTR. 10 years between the three parts of the nonology (ie, I comes out 10 years after VI. VII comes out 10 years after III). Tell Lucas: Cast it all, film it all, don't tell anyone. Don't release control to your 'universe' to novel-writers. Get a good ghostwriter to help you make sure the continuity is kept, and the series doesn't go so far downhill.

      Episode III, I'll probably go see after the hype has worn down, and it's at the $1 theater.

      --
      It's a little wrong to say a tomato is a vegetable. It's a lot wrong to say it's a suspension bridge.
  14. I can understand... by craenor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People not wanting plot details, but in light of the fact that this has become a "news item" ... and not just on /. either ... do you people whining about the spoiler really think you can get all the way to the movie without finding this out?

    I mean, hello...welcome to the world of computers, posters and trailers...

    1. Re:I can understand... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I can't stand spoiler-panic. It's the stupidest attitude towards narratives (other than, say, a whodunit or other "punchline" plot structures) that I can possibly imagine. You know, I'm going to a good production of Hamlet *even though I know everybody dies at the end.* I'd go to see My Big Fat Greek Wedding *even though I know there will be a big fat Greek guy at the end.*

    2. Re:I can understand... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Do you really think anyone reading slashdot cares enough about episode 3 to not want spoilers? I really think a lot of /.ers are hoping, praying for a reason to even see episode 3. I don't have very high hopes for episode 3, but I'd really WANT it to be good. I just know it's going to suck.

      Though you've gotta give it to Lucas. Episode 1 and 2 made me start to hate the first 3 movies.

    3. Re:I can understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What!! Everyone dies.

    4. Re:I can understand... by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1


      Exactly. Since this is an official announcement from starwars.com, you can hardly expect to have been able to avoid this "spoiler". While I get the feeling Lucas tries to pretend not to care about the terrible reviews, it sounds like he's eager to throw anything into the third movie to get the Star Wars fans back.

      Besides, there were Wookies (and E.T.s) in the first movie (sitting in the Senate seats), so we really can't be too surprised about this.

  15. what spoiler? by Zebbers · · Score: 0, Troll

    if finding out that chewie is gon be in the movie spoils it for you then you need a life. christ. you can know every character that will appear and if it is a good movie, it should still all be a surprise to you. dont blame the crappy star wars prequels on spoilers.

    inconsiderate my ass. its a fucking movie. go live in a bubble if you really dont want to know.

    1. Re:what spoiler? by beebware · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, how can people really scream "Spoiler" since they already know how the series ends?
      Shock news: Luke is Darth Vader's son!

    2. Re:what spoiler? by Small+Hairy+Troll · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one on the planet (other than George) that actually liked the Ewoks ?

    3. Re:what spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shock news: Luke is Darth Vader's son!

      Thanks a lot you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:what spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go get "Excel Saga" to find out what the Ewoks REALLY are. They aren't your friends.

    5. Re:what spoiler? by L0rdJagged · · Score: 1

      I liked the Ewoks. But I was pretty young when the movies came out.

    6. Re:what spoiler? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you were over 12 when the movie came out, then yes, you are the only one.

      I think the reason people hate ewoks so much, is because it was originally supposed to be Wookies.Or so the rumor went.
      With that in mind, peple built up how cool that would be. Lucas could touch on how the Empire repressed other species and enslaved the wookies. It would have been much more believable when a wookie hits an armored storm trooper. then the Storm Trooper went down.
      I think a couple of minor changes could have made a take over from the ewoks more believable.
      If our heros raided a storm trooper outpost that had a weapons cache and gave some ewoks guns.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:what spoiler? by Small+Hairy+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you were over 12 when the movie came out, then yes, you are the only one.

      I was 11 at the time. Ah, those were the days.

      However if my son, now 2 years old, ever watches Episodes I & II and actually decides he likes Jar-Jar Binks... well, I'll have to take another look at the will.

    8. Re:what spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shock news: Luke is Darth Vader's son!
      Gee, I always thought that Vader was Luke's Father's Brother's nephew's cousin's former roommate, oh, wait that was spaceballs, never mind. ;)

  16. In other news by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Lone Gunmen are dead!!!

    1. Re:In other news by bahamat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're not very smart if you think that you wouldn't see chewbacca in the tv spots 6 months before the movie's release.

      Here's another spoiler for you, Anakin will become Darth Vader and use a red light saber.

      Sorry to spoil the movie for you though.

    2. Re:In other news by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Your post is strangely bitter, insulting, and unrelated to my own.

    3. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us die-hard fans don't watch tv or go to the movies prior to it being released for that reason.

      I had not seen one trailer for either Star Wars movie, the Matrix, or Lord of the Rings before I saw the movie.

    4. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      freak.

    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?? NOOOO!!!

    6. Re:In other news by OMEGA+Power · · Score: 1

      "Here's another spoiler for you, Anakin will become Darth Vader and use a red light saber." Damnit! Now you gave it away and there's no reasson for me to see the movie.

    7. Re:In other news by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Man, that's almost as bad as when I was going to see Titanic, and somebody told me the iceberg did it. Grrr...

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  17. Life Debt? by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Since Harrison Ford feels that reprising a young han solo would be going back to his pre-star days and would look utterly rediculous (I agree), does that mean we're going to see someone like Tyler Hoechlin as a young han solo? "Some people say that Jango Fett was a good man, other people say that there was no good in him at all..."

    Or are we going to get an ALL CGI Jar Solo? "Mesa wanna play you sabbac for your hunka junka ship!"

    Or maybe a Golem Solo that runs around shouting "My creditssss...."

    1. Re:Life Debt? by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Uhmmm... not sure where you picked up the idea that Ford was going to be in Ep III... couldn't find it in the article.

      Clearly, even if he was to be in it, he would probably play Han's Solo's grandfather or something. Han himself would probably be no more than 10 or so at this point.

    2. Re:Life Debt? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      ""he would probably play Han's Solo's grandfather or something.""

      *shudder* Don't give Lucas ideas. I can just see it.

      Dark robed figure: Han, I am your grandfather!

      Han: No, no.....NOOOOO!

      Palpatine grins slowly, then cackles evilly...."See, even the Sith get a little action once in a while."

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    3. Re:Life Debt? by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      I was just riffing on the idea that in order for chewey to get in on this whole star wars rebellion thing, Han has to save his life and thereby bond chewey to him in a "Life Debt."

      I assume that this has to happen sometime after ep II, because the story is pretty dramatic.

      Also there's that whole "Han Solo- Swoop racer" thing from tales of the bounty hunters which promises to be another pod-racer style sequence and you know how lucasarts loves things like that to spin off into games.

  18. Right up there... by feepness · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...with "The Lone Gunmen are Dead". What an ass.

    Another editor in my killfile.

    FYI to remove an editor, go to your Preferences->User->Homepage, Exclude Authors (timothy in this case) and then hit save at the bottom.

    I've got three in there so far.

    1. Re:Right up there... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      As has been pointed out, you can filter out news stories about the star wars prequels. Not a bad idea if you're trying to avoid spoilers. Now that I know, I can stop bitching when they post that Anakin goes over to the dark side.

    2. Re:Right up there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with "The Lone Gunmen are Dead". What an ass.

      The Lone Gunmen are dead???? YOU BASTARD! You couldn't have at least put ***SPOILER*** in front of that?

    3. Re:Right up there... by usotsuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Technically, he went over to the Dark Side in Ep. 2 when he slew all those Sandpeople.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    4. Re:Right up there... by Patik · · Score: 1
      Another editor in my killfile
      Good for you. Eventually your Slashdot front page can be blank because every editor has, at one point, posted something you found objectionable. For shame! How utterly human of them to make a mistake!

      There are going to be lots of Star Wars mini-spoilers before the movie is released. As another reader pointed out, just block Star Wars content. Better yet, stop reading the internet altogether and turn off your TV, then you'll be sure to be completely surprised when you see it.

    5. Re:Right up there... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "FYI to remove an editor, go to your Preferences->User->Homepage, Exclude Authors (timothy in this case) and then hit save at the bottom.

      I've got three in there so far. "


      Or you could realize that no damage was done that a movie poster wouldn't cause, and move on.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Right up there... by feepness · · Score: 1

      Good for you. Eventually your Slashdot front page can be blank because every editor has, at one point, posted something you found objectionable. For shame! How utterly human of them to make a mistake!

      It's irrelevant whether it's a mistake. They chose to do it, therefore they are gone. Now I've been reading Slashdot for two years, and I've garbaged 3 editors (~10%). Two for spoilers and one for repeatedly posting moronic things (Jon Katz). At this rate, providing they add no new editors, I'll run out of content in 20 years. Hmmm, I'll take my chances. Also if I'm not using this feature correctly, can you tell me exactly what this feature was intended for then?

      There are going to be lots of Star Wars mini-spoilers before the movie is released. As another reader pointed out, just block Star Wars content. Better yet, stop reading the internet altogether and turn off your TV, then you'll be sure to be completely surprised when you see it.

      Killfiling Star Wars was a great idea as well, though it's a bummer to miss all the anti-Jar Jar talk. Ridiculous suggestions aside, I and many of my friends managed to avoid pretty much everything about Star Wars (and LOTR) and that's what we'd like. How hard is it to put "Original Cast Member to Reprise Role in Star Wars: Episode III (spoilers)". Really, how hard is it to turn on his brain for one second?

  19. Big freaking deal by bahamat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was excited before Episode I came out. Excited for probably the worst movie I've seen in the past 10 years (except for maybe D&D).

    You remember what Scotty used to say, "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me".

    I should have known, because I was fooled a second time with Episode II.

    I'm not even going to bother with Episode III. Lucas has so discraced the legacy of Star Wars I can't even watch the origonal trilogy anymore.

    [offtopic rant star trek vs. star wars]
    Star Trek would obviously win. All they have to do is beam the Jedi through the transporter and all the midichlorians get stuck in the Enterprise's biofilter and you've got Chief O'Brien saying "Ok, Darth, who's your daddy?"
    [offtopic rant - star trek vs. star wars]

    1. Re:Big freaking deal by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Funny
      You remember what Scotty used to say, "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me".


      I thought that went something like "Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me twice... You can't get fooled again!"
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:Big freaking deal by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Star Trek would obviously win
      Uhmmm... I'd like to see *anything* in the Star Trek universe repel the firepower of a Death Star.

      "You don't know the power of the Dark Side!"

    3. Re:Big freaking deal by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      you seem to have forgotten the Q

      End of story.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    4. Re:Big freaking deal by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Star Trek would obviously win. All they have to do is beam the Jedi through the transporter and all the midichlorians get stuck in the Enterprise's biofilter and you've got Chief O'Brien saying "Ok, Darth, who's your daddy?"

      The classic exmaple is a star destroyer vs. the enterprise.

      And the SD would "win" if they fought at any reasonable range. They simply have more guns, which would be the equivalent of flying the Enterprise through an interstellar lightning storm with exploding hail.

    5. Re:Big freaking deal by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Uhmmm... I'd like to see *anything* in the Star Trek universe repel the firepower of a Death Star. "

      I'd like to see the Death Star spin around to aim it's gun at a moving starship.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Big freaking deal by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You underestimate the seductive nature of the dark side.

      O'Brien would have been corrupt years a head of time, since Darth can see the future.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Big freaking deal by bahamat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The classic exmaple is a star destroyer vs. the enterprise.

      And the SD would "win" if they fought at any reasonable range


      Actually, this is not true. Star Destroyers use lasers for weaponry (well, turbo-lasers but lasers nonetheless). May I quote some dialog from the TNG episode The Outrageous Okona:

      Worf: They're locking lasers.
      Riker: Lasers? That won't even penetrate the hull.
      Picard: Well, shields up anyway, we wouldn't want them to think we aren't taking them seriously.

      So a SD with all of it's thousands of lasers might do enough damage to scratch the NCC-1701-D registry right off. The best hope would be simply ramming, either with all those TIEs or just the SD itself, but unless the Enterprise was incapacitated first it would easily move out of the way being a smaller more manuverable ship.

    8. Re:Big freaking deal by LordofEntropy · · Score: 0

      "You remember what Scotty used to say, "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me"."

      I believe the quote is actually:
      "Fool me once, shame on... shame on... I won't be fooled again." - George W. Bush

      --
      Entropy just isn't what it used to be.
    9. Re:Big freaking deal by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Turbo-lasers not behave like lasers and in fact can't be lasers. More likely they are bolts of exotic matter wrapped in self-contained electromagnetic bubbles, or maybe something analogous to a warp field. Whatever it is, exactly, it would definitely play merry hell with the Enterprise's power sources and shields.

      And the SD also has another advantage; its crew is protected by fuses, so that when a particular subsystem is damaged, the console that controls it doesn't explode in the operator's face...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    10. Re:Big freaking deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that there isn't cannon city looking things on the surface of the moon sized battlestation.

    11. Re:Big freaking deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turbolasers are *NOT* "lasers." They are plasma based weapons.

      And remember, the Enterprise's hull is made out of titanium, not some special metal with exotic properties. So the fact that lasers wouldn't even scratch the hull indicate not that Federation ships possess special "laser-proof hulls" but instead that their ships' weaponry simply does not output enough power to makes lasers effective.

    12. Re:Big freaking deal by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not true. Star Destroyers use lasers for weaponry (well, turbo-lasers but lasers nonetheless). May I quote some dialog from the TNG episode The Outrageous Okona:

      SW weaponry is no more a lazer than ST weaponry is. They both travel at sublight speeds, and they're both visible from the side.

      Obviously, they're BOTH directed energy weapons, and they BOTH designed to attack/penetrate force fields. While it's obvious that ST has a higher per-strike charge (personal phasers either utterly destroy their targets or pierce through them), a SW SD can make up in sheer volume for what it lacks in power.

      Remember: A SD has oodles and oodles of guns--and oodles and oodles and oodles of small fighters. If needs be, they could just kamikaze the enterprise with five thousand TIEs and win.

      Of course, the quality of life on the Enterprise is better, and it can certainly claim a cleaner design and better PR--but it's really outclassed by a SD.

  20. What a wookie. by iomud · · Score: 4, Funny

    If Chewbacca is a wookie, you must acquit.

    1. Re:What a wookie. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I bent my Wookie.

    2. Re:What a wookie. by T-Kir · · Score: 1

      It does not make sense. THAT does not make sense.

      ;-)

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    3. Re:What a wookie. by javiercero · · Score: 1

      .... look at the monkey! :)

  21. no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this one goes there, that one goes here!

  22. Star Wars Extra Super Secret Spoiler!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Star Wars Episode 3 will feature Chewbacca, Han Solo, Darth Vader, Luke, Leia, the Death Star, and everything else you remember from the first Star Wars movie... because it will in fact be the first Star Wars movie. That's right, George Lucas will be slapping the name "Episode 3: Whatever" on to "Episode 4: A New Hope" and selling it as a whole new movie! The tagline? "If you loved the original Star Wars, you'll love Episode 3."

    1. Re:Star Wars Extra Super Secret Spoiler!!! by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      "If you loved the original Star Wars, you'll love Episode 3."

      Love it?! You're gonna like it!

  23. Use the force... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 4, Informative

    Step 1: Go to your preferences page.

    Step 2: Scroll down to the "Star wars Prequels" checkbox.

    Step 3: Check it.

    Step 4: Done.

    Then you won't be bothered with those pesky Star Wars articles that will contain filthy spoilers.

    Oh, you want to know about the Star Wars Prequels, but you just don't want any spoilers?

    Step 1: Stop reading slashdot.

    Step 2: You can't have everything.

    Step 2: Done.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:Use the force... by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      It would take so little effort for the editors to show a little discretion. Geez, they could just mark these things with "*SPOILER*" in the article title and no one would complain. That's all. I may not be able to have everything, but since I already don't have the contents of Fort Knox, I figure I ought to be able to get this at least.

    2. Re:Use the force... by khold · · Score: 1

      Step 3, Profit???

      --
      rm -rf sig
    3. Re:Use the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, they could just mark these things with "*SPOILER*" in the article title and no one would complain.

      I would. If the rest of you wouldn't then you're just not trying.

    4. Re:Use the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the editors don't consider it a spoiler.

    5. Re:Use the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... the only problem is that they didn't put it in the "star wars prequels" category! I have my settings done correctly... but this showed up anyway, because the editors didn't put it in the right category!!!

      grrrrrrr... [rant]I definitely did not want to know this. I saw AOTC without having known anything (or at least, those few spoilers I knew, I had put together entirely wrong, so it was as if I knew nothing), and was entirely blow away! I want to have the same kind of an experience for the last star wars movie EVER... bah...[/rant]

    6. Re:Use the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, mebbe you shooda been logged in...

  24. Shameless Hucksterism by blair1q · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They needed to "tie the series together?"

    They've got Obi-Wan, Anakin, and eventually Leia and Luke to tie the series together.

    They're throwing in Chewie because:

    a) Lucas ran out of ideas a long damn time ago.
    b) Characters from the original trilogy sell better than characters from this one.
    c) Hey. Don't complain. Could have been Ewoks...

    1. Re:Shameless Hucksterism by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      From what I have been told, they are throwing Chewie (and the rest of the wookies) into Episode 3 because they were put into slavery and forced to build the Death Star. Chewie was freed by a rouge Emperial soldier by the name of ..... Anyone?

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
    2. Re:Shameless Hucksterism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to be funny, but are you American?

      I'm trying to get numbers regarding the nationalities of people who misspell "rogue" as "rouge".
      So far I've only had one non-US citizen and I'm thinking it's a result of the over-simplification of American English spelling conventions.
      Thanks for your time.

    3. Re:Shameless Hucksterism by wardk · · Score: 1

      but they already have "sheer awefulness" to "tie" all the episodes together, so why sully chewbacca ?

    4. Re:Shameless Hucksterism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the following option:

      d) CowboyNeal beat Chewbacca at chess

  25. Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by Gary+Yogurt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does everyone keep running into eachother? This galaxy of Lucas' is pretty tiny. Is Wedge going to run around in Episode III and introduce himself to everyone?

    1. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      That would be a good time to explain why his face changes twice in the original trilogy...

      "Well, I was never really happy about my jawline profile... is this the best look for a hero of the rebellion? Or should I nip here, lift there..."

      "Go Away Wedge, you bother me."

    2. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by HeywoodJablomi69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The implications for it are pretty chilling, if you really get down to think about it as David Brin did in this article. George Lucas seems to think that those 26 people are destined to control the fate of the galaxy, and all us peons, with our "free will", don't matter one whit. Just one more reason why Star Trek kicks the hell out of Star Wars.

    3. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bullshit philosophical implications of a movie! Wow! Anyway, after reading it, it stinks of a bad interpretation of Nietzsche. In fact, if you replace Nietzsche's ideal of the ubermensch with "control of the universe" you've got it exactly. And to be honest, do you really have "free will?" The concept of free will is absurd in itself. It's self-contradictory (not EVERYONE can have free will, the wills of others impede our own wishes) and really hard to peg down.

    4. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "How does everyone keep running into eachother? This galaxy of Lucas' is pretty tiny. Is Wedge going to run around in Episode III and introduce himself to everyone? "

      The theory I came up with is that the galaxy in Star Wars is VERY tiny, as "The Galaxy is on Orion's Belt" tiny. Not only does this explain why going from system to system is like going down to the store for a beer, it also explains how the Millineum Falcon can travel around various star systems with it's light-speed drive down.

      The movies make a HELL of a lot more sense with this understanding.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      "The theory I came up with is that the galaxy in Star Wars is VERY tiny..."

      Even still, one would have to assume the planets are all Death Star in size or smaller. I mean, it's difficult enough to bump into a random person twice in your lifetime on this one planet, nevermind galaxies of planets!

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    6. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Even still, one would have to assume the planets are all Death Star in size or smaller."

      That comment was kind of confusing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the force!

    8. Re:Total of people in the Star Wars Universe: 26 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you assume Chewie will be "running into" anyone? Someone else posted in this discussion something about how th e Chewie story might be a side story to set up the Solo-Hutt situation. That could be done without Chewie coming into direct contact with any of the Ep 1 & 2 characters thus far. Seems fiarly logical to me.

  26. What about... by fishrokka · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the rest of Chewie's family? Here's hoping Maula, Itchy, and Lumpy will also be making return appearances.

    1. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...along with Art Carney, Harvey Korman, and Jefferson Starship. Yeah!!!! That, and a very special appearance by Nancy Reagan and U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan!

    2. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, just made my day.

  27. favorite wookie by khold · · Score: 1

    I believe the only reason Mayhew plays "everyone's favorite Wookie" is because he plays the only Wookie, at least in the movies.

    --
    rm -rf sig
    1. Re:favorite wookie by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the Star Wars Christmas Special.

      (Suddenly millions of voices cried out in terror...)

    2. Re:favorite wookie by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Your journey to the Dark Side is complete.

    3. Re:favorite wookie by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      As someone old enough to remember actually watching that, all I can remember about it is that it took place on Chewbacca's home planet, with houses in the trees just like would be later duplicated for the Ewoks.

      I remember telling someone once, "You know, they wanted to use Chewbacca's home planet for Return of the Jedi, but they wanted a cute toy to sell, so they made Ewoks, which is kind of a pig-latin for Wookee.", and their jaw dropped to the floor. Seemed pretty obvious to me.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  28. Re:I bet the movie still lacks a two major charact by Lispy · · Score: 1

    I must admit i feel the same. The first ones were better in all aspects. Hell, even the effects were better. Episode 2 was probably the worst movie i ever watched in a cinema. Cant believe I flew over to NYC to see the premiere. I mean, from GERMANY!!! Stupid me!

  29. Jar-Jar's Walking Papers by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    I am reminded of the parody clip called "Jar-Jar's Walking Papers". Shortly before dismissing Jar-Jar, George Lucas has some bad news to break to Chewbacca.

    GL: "Chewie, Jar-Jar is your fah-ther."
    Chewie, in his wookiee groan: "Wooooooooooa!" (meaning Noooo!)

    Moments later, Jar-Jar is wiped from the slate, as a computer animated character, by the simple method of "Controlsa, Altsa, Deletesa". Oh so priceless. Who wants the clip?!

    1. Re:Jar-Jar's Walking Papers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me. URL?

    2. Re:Jar-Jar's Walking Papers by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Jar-Jar's Walking Papers by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      I accidentally responded to my original comment, but posting as an AC means you won't see this response anyway unless you remember where it was posted. Anyway, see the comment with the URL here.

  30. Stupid Fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at all you pathetic George Lucas fanboys. After the last two star wars movies, how could anyone give a shit about the third? If Lucas filmed himself taking a dump in a darth vader mask, you'd all flock to the theaters to see it. "Oooooh! Chewbacca is in the next star wars movie!" Wow great! Maybe Lucas can ruin yet another character from the original films! You're all so fucking pathetic.

    1. Re:Stupid Fanboys by daler31 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just because you can't see the true genius of George Lucas doesn't mean something sucks. I will bet these movies will go down in history as the 21st century Beowulf or Hamlet.

    2. Re:Stupid Fanboys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was sarcasm right? Dear Jesus tell me that was sarcasm.

    3. Re:Stupid Fanboys by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Obviously not, since someone with an IQ well into the triple digets decided it was a Troll instead of a witty retort to a neanderthalistic posting.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  31. Lucas to Mayhew by ath0mic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lucas points to casting room:

    "I don't care what you smell... get in there"

  32. MOD PARENT UP by Bearded+Pear+Shaped · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's true

    I would know!!

    --
    Who are y oo ?
  33. Re:I bet the movie still lacks a two major charact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the hell up, retard.

  34. OK by oaf357 · · Score: 1

    Well. If Chewbacca is back then where will Han Solo fit in?

  35. Re: Han Solo by Animats · · Score: 1

    "We can rebuild him. We have the technology. But we'll have to start with scrap."

  36. from what I heard... by newsdee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    c) Hey. Don't complain. Could have been Ewoks...

    The Ewoks were supposed to be Wookies originally. But then some genius thought they would sell more dolls if they were all small and cute and annoying. So there you go, they just had to flip the name... ee-wok... wok-ee... :-)

    With a little bit of mental exercise you can ignore what your eyes see and imagine it's the planet of the Wookies all right.
    Use the force, wook. :-)

    1. Re:from what I heard... by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      I heard it was that Lucas didn't think he'd get to ep6 so he put a wookie in ep4.

    2. Re:from what I heard... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      I pretend they're midget wookies...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:from what I heard... by Highlander · · Score: 1

      I always thought the reasont that they were ewoks and not wookies was because a planet full of wookies wouldn't put up with a bunch of Imperials laying claim to they world and would (try to) throw them off.

      Highlander.

    4. Re:from what I heard... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Informative
      What became the ground battle (the forest part) of the Battle of Endor in Return of the Jedi was part of the early versions of the original story, back when Lucas first began working on "The Star Wars back in the '70s. Though Lucas always wanted to climax his space opera with a multi-tiered ground/space battle between the Imperial forces and rebels who had allied themselves with a low-tech society of hirsute anthropomorphic aliens (originally Wookiees), he was unable to incorporate it into the (first) movie, for lack of various resources, but still wanted to have at least one of his beloved Wookiees, so created the Chewbacca character to be Han's sidekick.

      After the original film was a colossal success and he was able to make sequels and spend more money on them he was finally able to do the forest battle he'd originally wanted, or at least something like it; however, having established (through Chewie) that Wookiees were a technologically adept people comfortable with spaceships and the like, he couldn't use Wookiees for the ground battle - part of the battle's whole reason for being was to have a technologically unsophisticated group of "primitives" overwhelm a technically superior force, and Lucas thought he'd established Wookiees as sufficiently technological that they no longer suited their original purpose. He therefore created Ewoks, who were smaller, but really amounted to the same thing as Wookiees in their original conception. Ewoks became smaller than humans (instead of larger, like Wookiees) mainly for practical considerations - not only would making them larger make them too much like Wookiees, they would also be harder to realize on screen (it's easier to find a lot of performers and stunt people the size of Kenny Baker and Warwick Davis than it is to find ones the size of Peter Mayhew, aside from which dozens or hundreds of small costumes could be made more quickly and cheaply than large ones - yes, it's that simple ;-) ).

      Another take on the idea can be found in the early post-Star Wars novel Splinter of the Mind's Eye, by Alan Dean Foster. Foster had ghostwritten the original Star Wars novelization from Lucas's script, and the novelization was published under Lucas's name; Lucas had discussed some of his then-as-yet unused story concepts for SW with Foster, including the idea of a ground battle between Imperials and an alliance of Rebels with a low-tech alien society. Shortly after the movie opened, when it was clear it was going to be successful but not clear just how successful (that is, not yet certain there would be additional movies), Foster began writing Splinter, incorporating some of Lucas's original ideas (including that one), and it was published in early '78, although by that time preproduction had begun on The Empire Strikes Back (when Foster began the novel, apparently it was intended to be the "official" continuation of the Star Wars storyline. The novel's plot-central Force-amplifying crystal was another idea Lucas had in his early work on the saga, but unlike the battle it hasn't yet made it into a film, at least not in anything like its original form, though the "midi-chlorians" of Episode I may have roots in the same ideas).

    5. Re:from what I heard... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "With a little bit of mental exercise you can ignore what your eyes see and imagine it's the planet of the Wookies all right."

      How do we know that Wookies don't have minorities?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:from what I heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really liked "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" when I read it, and I actually still do. I also like the early Han Solo books. They capture the original flavor and excitement of Star Wars with much better plots and writing. A lot of the new books I don't care for, but I love Timothy Zahn's work. Really, books are a great place for this universe, but it takes a really good author to make it work. Would that Foster had been given control of the story within broad lines from Lucas.

    7. Re:from what I heard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice explanation... except that Lucas could just as well have decided that the original wookie planet was a seldom-visited backwards place, and Chewbacca was one of the few wookies to get off the planet young enough to go to tech school... It all goes back to the fact that ewoks make better cute dolls.

    8. Re:from what I heard... by kria · · Score: 1

      The ewoks always have reminded me (or since I read it) of the Fuzzies, created by H. Beam Piper (The Complete Fuzzy), who, alas, killed himself before he could have made an issue of it. Very good books though, though the first two are better than the last - possibly because they only found the third one after he was dead.

  37. Troll by TenPin22 · · Score: 1

    Wow maybe the 3rd film will be as crap as the first 2.

    1. Re:Troll by r00zky · · Score: 1

      now that's a real SPOILER

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  38. Folks please by Kelz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you didn't like the movies don't take this post as an invitation for you to bash it. It seems like every time someone mentions some key word like "star wars" in a NEWS article, the same old damn topics always come up. I myself hated Jar Jar, but overall 1 and 2 were good movies! Lucas's "vision" was to create a precurser to the original star wars series, and he performed the task well imho. Lets keep the talk to Wookies and not weather the movie was good.

    This is not a troll, as trolls are green.

    1. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mr. Lucas, why not just post as yourself?

    2. Re:Folks please by Bearded+Pear+Shaped · · Score: 1

      They were crap movies. Period.

      --
      Who are y oo ?
    3. Re:Folks please by glwtta · · Score: 3, Insightful
      but overall 1 and 2 were good movies!

      Dude, have you ever actually seen a good movie? What, exactly, was good about them? The overall story arc, in the broadest of senses, was quite cool (and oddly topical), but for the rest? The laughable plots, the acting worthy of a highschool senior play, the absolute worst dialog to be featured in a mainstream movie for quite some time, special effects that would have been embarassing five years ago, the music, while certainly not bad, was just the same tired old thing that we've come to expect from this type of movie, no sign of originality whatsoever. Oh, I suppose there is really nothing to be said against the camerawork and the editing - bang up job there.

      It's all well and good, as you mentioned, that many individual characters and situations went against our individual good taste, that certainly doesn't make the movies themselves bad. The overall poor quality of the movies is what made them bad, and that is something that personal preference doesn't play into. No my friend, those were most certainly NOT good movies, by any strech of imagination.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Folks please by L0rdJagged · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, the 'romance' scenes between Anakin and Amidala were so cringingly bad. Romping in a field of flowers, the scene in front of the fireplace...some forbidden romance. Ugh, wish that whole bit had just been left out...

    5. Re:Folks please by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself this: Do you really believe Episode 1 would have done as successfully as it had if there weren't previous Star Wars movies to drive it? Does Episode 1 stand on its own as the introduction to the series? I could go on and on about the faults and horrible filmmaking of the first two episodes. Not horrible in the "good" way, i.e., camp, but genuinely horrible because of lack of talent.

      If I ever introduce people to Star Wars in the future, it will be through Episode 4. They'll laugh and wonder what the big deal is if I showed them the first two.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    6. Re:Folks please by inkswamp · · Score: 1

      Thank you for taking the words right out of my mouth! My sentiments exactly. What's funny about the complaints about the latest films is that most of the criticisms apply to the old films, but most "fans" out there haven't come to terms with how much more jaded and cynical they've become since the original trilogy was out. Newsflash: the acting, dialog, plot lines and effects of the original films were mediocre too. The only difference is that the concept of an effects-loaded fantasy space film was newer at the time. The newer films are no worse or better. The whole point is not to make an Oscar-winning film, but to pull the viewer into that other world. All of the films succeed amazingly at that. Talk to the average school kid out there who hasn't yet lost the ability to go along with a moviemaker's vision.

      I wish us older Star Wars fans would stop pissing on the parade for the younger fans.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    7. Re:Folks please by oconnorcjo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I myself hated Jar Jar, but overall 1 and 2 were good movies! Lucas's "vision" was to create a precurser to the original star wars series, and he performed the task well imho.

      Actually I thought the movies were far from good.

      Major flaws in movie 1:
      1. Anakans script was DESIGNED for somebody who was at least a teenager. No seven year old has the hots for a girl in the way Ani talked or had the time to build so much hardware or race in as many races as the movie claimed. If Ani was too old to start the training it means that Jedi's were taking babies from mothers breasts (and makes Luke's start seem rediculous).

      2. Kill the whole mediaclorite(?)/Virgin Mary mess.

      3. What is comedy relief doing in a serious space drama? Jar-jar should have been killed from the final cut.


      While movie 1 actually had a pretty good script (that was butchered in execution), movie 2 was just a bad script. There were far better stories that could have been told that would have enriched the Star Wars Universe, but instead, we get a cop story with a twist of romance. Despite the weak plot of movie 2, it was executed much better. It is a shame that the "new Anikan" was not in the first movie.

      What made the first three movies (IV-VI) so wonderfull was that they had good stories that were executed well. Very impressive to do three times in row. In the first three, Lucas was the writer but let Irvin Kershner direct V and Richard Marquand direct VI. I get the impression that Lucas is a better writer than a director/producer. Or maybe his overwhelming control over the final product puts him in a position where no-one can criticize/"provide perspective" to his creative vision anymore. Whatever the reason, the first three films are classics while the stuff made recently is just summer action flicks that would have been forgotten by most if it was not for the name brand (Star Wars) attached to it.
      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    8. Re:Folks please by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and the beach overlook scene

      "sand is coarse....blah blah blah but you're smooth blah blah "

      For Bog's sake, Lucas, farm the poetic romance out to someone else.

      Face it, you simply can't write scripts as well as other people.

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The whole point is not to make an Oscar-winning film, but to pull the viewer into that other world.
      thats the problem you see. In the original three the horrible acting and bad scripting could be excused because of the epic feel of the movie especially as it unfolded with each movie as time progressed. Everything got better and had a more galactic feel to it (more being relative or course) as the movies flew by.

      Then we have the simplistic and childish prequels. Instead of explaining things they just gloss over the reasons for certain elements' existence and fill in the rest with insulting and stupid coincidence. Lucas clearly should have written some movies set in a completely different Universe but chose instead to burn down the existing story and backdrop. Many of the novels out there did a fine job of explaining or alluding to the causes of the political strife, the publics rejection of the Jedi and so forth. Lucas either cannot think in such complex terms or is spending too much time dumbing down the plot for kids. If you want to make a kids movie, then make a kids movie. I personally think that the Arthurian legends are great for all ages but you will notice that the complex interaction of events, people and places are not simple by any means. Instead of dumbing down, why not simply give the viewers something to look up to. Later, after the movie is over they can begin to ask themselves those serious questions of government, liberty, freedom and war.

    10. Re:Folks please by L0rdJagged · · Score: 1

      Oh god, I'd forgotten the sand line. I don't think I could sit through that movie a second time.

    11. Re:Folks please by Ralgha · · Score: 1

      I was in high school when I saw Episode I, and I thought it blew goats for all the reasons other people have said previously. For the record, I like the original trilogy.

    12. Re:Folks please by AceM2 · · Score: 1

      I doubt you care about my opinion, but I just wanted to add to what you were saying about Lucas being a better writer than director/producer.. To me, I don't think he's that great of a *writer*, but that he has some pretty good ideas overall. I mean, Episode I & II even both had a good IDEA, but to me he just wanted to fit too much timespan into three movies and ended up losing a lot of detail and such.

      Casting abilities really sucked though, I always wonder how he got such great actors in American Graffiti and the original StarWars, but got a bunch of crap in the prequels.. It's almost as if he thought the prequels wouldn't work without bad acting..

    13. Re:Folks please by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      I fast forward thru those sections. Seeing it in the theater was funny - every time the scene(s) came up there was a collective groan from the adults in the audience and giggles from the teenies. Funny.

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    14. Re:Folks please by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > If you didn't like the movies don't take this post as an
      > invitation for you to bash it

      Well, there's a lot of people who want their disappointment in Star Wars to be legitimized by seeing Star Wars-bashing on every Star Wars story. They don't like the idea that some people may have liked Episodes 1 and 2. So they want to drown those people out by describing in hyperbolic terms how much they utterly loathed Episode 1 and 2.

      They ignore that Jar-Jar is no more annoying than C3PO and that the acting and dialog is no better than in Episodes 4-6.

      I guess they hope that Lucas will suddenly become a Slashdot reader and miraculously turn Episode 3 into The Matrix, complete with bullet-time Jedi, electronica music, sunglasses, and plenty of machine gun fire.

      I for one liked the Episodes 1 and 2, and after repeated viewings, I like Jar-Jar. He makes me laugh, so sue me.

      For full disclosure, I didn't like The Matrix, I liked Lord of the Rings, I liked Minority Report, and I didn't see Spiderman.

      I guess some people just don't like diversity of opinions.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    15. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up for Christ's sake--they are freakin' Hollywood commercial productions, not some holy religious icons or something. If people think the last two flicks suck--and many do, obviously--why shouldn't they say so? So you and George Lucas won't feel bad?

      Lucas has completely lost it the opinion of most; if you feel otherwise, good for you. I certainly wouldn't ask you not to post your opinion--don't ask me not to post mine.

    16. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess some people just don't like diversity of opinions."

      Sounds like you.

    17. Re:Folks please by Flamerule · · Score: 1
      I'd like to second the other reply by saying I also saw Episode I while I was in high school, and it sucked ass.
      Talk to the average school kid out there who hasn't yet lost the ability to go along with a moviemaker's vision.
      Hardly. Unless by "school kid" you mean a 1st-grader from elementary school. I'm sure the kindergarteners out there are finding the prequels quite entertaining, which makes sense because Lucas is obviously tailoring the movies to them. How else to explain unimaginably unwatchable dreck like JarJar?
      I wish us older Star Wars fans would stop pissing on the parade for the younger fans.
      It's not a parade; the prequels aren't some golden opportunity for young people to see a series that will loom large in their memory as the years go on. The crap Lucas is putting out will fade away quickly, but luckily no one will care, because we'll have the Lord of the Rings to take its place.
    18. Re:Folks please by rwise2112 · · Score: 1
      Major flaws in movie 1:
      1. Anakans script was DESIGNED for somebody who was at least a teenager. No seven year old has the hots for a girl in the way Ani talked or had the time to build so much hardware or race in as many races as the movie claimed. If Ani was too old to start the training it means that Jedi's were taking babies from mothers breasts (and makes Luke's start seem rediculous).
      2. Kill the whole mediaclorite(?)/Virgin Mary mess.
      3. What is comedy relief doing in a serious space drama? Jar-jar should have been killed from the final cut.


      I'd also add:
      4. There are always two - a master and an apprentice.
      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    19. Re:Folks please by L0rdJagged · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it could benefit from a lot more light saber duels and a lot less attempts at romance scenes.I am pretty sure my S.O. will be getting the dvd set so I'll just have to deal.

    20. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the absolute worst thing about the two movies was the editing: not in the sense of which takes they used and how the various scenes were cut together, but in the sense of what was kept in and what was removed from each movie. The race was just too damned long (of course, in the original version it was even LONGER).

      How to fix Star Wars I: age Anakin 6 years, cut out the race and turn it into some kind of firefight with Anakin as the pilot who saves Amidala when her ship is attacked by Darth Maul (say having Anakin disable Darth Maul's space craft on Tatooine), make Amidala a hereditary queen rather than an elected one, and a few other changes, and you'd have a damned good movie. Cut out the scene with the sea monsters. Swap R2D2's origin and C3PO's. Oh, and let the tank run over Jar Jar in the beginning.

      How to fix Star Wars II: make Anakin less of a whiner, give Obi-Wan a good swordfight in the middle, make it less obvious how evil Count Dookoo is (say, find some motivation for the separatists), make Boba Fett an adult clone who is flawed somehow, and was suborned by the mysterious Syphodeus, don't let Anakin get hurt until after Obi-Wan is hurt, and for god's sake, come up with some excuse why yoda can bound around like a muppett on uppers when he has a light saber in his hand but has to walk with a cane! (Jar-Jar's already dead).

      Scene to fix Star Wars III: a side scene with a young Han and Lando in a card game with Lando freaking out and only being stopped from killing Han by Chewie, yelling "you'll get my ship over my dead body" and Han shooting first (and, obviously, not killing him).

      Compared to most stuff out there, they' weren't terrible movies; they were about on a par with ROTJ. Thing is, ANH and TESB lead us to expect much, much more from what are really nothing more than expensive space operas.

    21. Re:Folks please by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Good Bog, you have an S.O. that likes Star Wars? You lucky dog, you. :-)

      I personally think AOTC could have benefitted from some real input from the fans. There were a lot of good ideas about solving the plot inconsistencies out there. But at that time, GL didn't seem to know that fanfix existed (other than the few "authorized official history fanfic" novels. Most were crap, IMHO

      There are many things in the SW universe that could be made into wonderful short story plots. I've written a few myself. But they don't exist according to GL.

      I wish he'd concentrate more on keeping the SW universe alive than he does on C&C....

      Cheers
      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    22. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I didn't think the cinematography was anything special, and the editing of Ep II was appallingly bad. Check out the scene where Padme is about to get lava dumped on her; it's impossible to tell where her vessel is in relation to the dispensing machine. Editing 101, Ben.

    23. Re:Folks please by shinma · · Score: 1
      What is comedy relief doing in a serious space drama?


      Have you even seen Episodes 4, 5, and 6? C3P0 and R2D2's main purpose was as comic relief, and Chewbacca and Han's relationship was nearly as humorous. The Star Wars movies have always been lighthearted.
      --
      Shinma
    24. Re:Folks please by JoeCotellese · · Score: 1

      Actually he didn't write two or three. He developed the story and left the writing to others, Leigh Bracket and Lawrence Kasdan. Leigh Bracket was considered a mentor of Ray Bradbury. Not very bad credentials for writing sci-fi. With her passing due to cancer during the first draft of ESB the work was handed over to Lawrence Kasdan.

      I do not discredit George Lucas's work and vision. While others may argue he copied/combined other ideas he certainly knew what made a good story. I remember saying to a co-worker before episode one, "it can't suck, he's had twenty years to come up with something." Man was I wrong.

    25. Re:Folks please by SpryGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You need to finish fixing Episode II: remove that ludicrous "video game" sequence on Genosis with the droid factory. Ugh. And the Arena scene? Stolen directly from Gladiator, with one of the monsters being a complete rip off of a StarCraft Hydrolisk. Double ugh. And the whole "who ordered the clone army, and why is no one really questioning the jedi's just coming in and taking it over and using it to fight the Count..." is way too murky and unclear.

      You can keep the underwater scene in Ep I if you make just one tiny change: right before Qui Gon says "There's always a bigger fish" when the big monster saves them by eating the smaller monster... have him close his eyes and reach out with the force to attract the bigger fish to their rescue. Suddenly that scene would work a lot better. Ditto for the very end... explain why there's only one federation ship more clearly, and then when the little rug-rat blows the thing up, make him more obviously use the force. The book made it much more clear about what happend, but in the movie it looked like it was nothing more than an 'accident'. Oh, and for Ep I you need to recast the kid... he was horrible.

      More character development for Darth Maul is necessary as well. The only way we know he's evil is that we are told he is, and because he looks so evil. It would have been so much better to have him look more normal, but having him be SHOWN being evil.

      Back to Episode II: show Aniken killing the sand people. They really wimped out on that. And you can't get rid of *all* his whining; you have to show that Luke inherits it :-)

      And in both movies: get rid of the stereotypical ethnic accents and features. The best thing about the original movies were that the aliens were *alien*, and when they spoke, they spoke *alien* tongues (which were eather subtitled, or not, and we just had to infer their meanings). Ep I and II are filled with the worst characatures and stereotypes of middle-eastern/jews, rastafarians, and jackie-chan b-movie cliches imaginable. Totally distracting. And get rid of the references to our culture, like the 'doo-doo' references, and the stupid fake-looking two-headed pod-race announcer that you half-expected to say "SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY!" Ugh.

      I agree with all you say, I just don't think you went far enoug :-)

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    26. Re:Folks please by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Um, you're gonna introduce people to Star Wars?

    27. Re:Folks please by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      3. What is comedy relief doing in a serious space drama? Jar-jar should have been killed from the final cut.

      I agree that the prequels majorly suck. It is just lacking something that I can't define that Episodes 4 and 5 (maaaybe 6) have. But what in god's name are you talking about? The original trilogy was FILLED with comic relief. I think the problem is BAD comic relief. There's nothing wrong with comic relief. And Star Wars was never "a serious space drama". It was great, and serious at times, but you're forgetting, there was plenty of comic relief.

    28. Re:Folks please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...with one of the monsters being a complete rip off of a StarCraft Hydrolisk.

      Wow, glad I'm not the only one who noticed =)

    29. Re:Folks please by enderwig · · Score: 1

      Oh, I suppose there is really nothing to be said against the camerawork and the editing - bang up job there.

      Did you forget that "Godzilla-zoom" effect when Amidala, Obi-Wan, Yoda, and Anakin are chasing Dooku? That was some seriously BAD camera work. I guess Lucas wanted to cement the fact that AotC really is a B-movie in A-movie clothes.

      Anthony

    30. Re:Folks please by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      Here's my take: the movies were terrible. The stories were good and at least reasonably consistent with each other (you'll never get complete consistency).

      A lot of people didn't understand why Ep 1 was such a big deal and thought it was just an excuse for the special effects. But I was pretty convinced that it set the stage quite nicely for things to come. How did the Emperor manage to rise to power the way he did (and disolve the senate as is mentioned)? Ep 2 did a fairly good job of explaining how Anakin allows his emotions to win out over good judgement.

      Sure, they might have been slow at times, but it's important to set the stage. The acting was rather marginal and the dialog was horrendous. But the stories themselves were important and explained a lot about Eps 4-6, for me.

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  39. For Those Who Don't Like StarWars Spoilers... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 0, Redundant
    ...and you read this article, it's your own fault. Don't you see that there is a subject called "Star Wars Prequels" on Slashdot? You should have disabled stories from that subject in your slashdot preferences.

    If you did not do that, then you have only yourself to blame for seeing this spoiler on Slashdot.

    1. Re:For Those Who Don't Like StarWars Spoilers... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      Whoops, mod parent down as redundant. Someone already posted the info that I posted.

    2. Re:For Those Who Don't Like StarWars Spoilers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Star Wars Prequels' != 'Star Wars Spoilers'

      It's very possible there could be non-spoiler prequel news, for example "Star Wars Episode 3 delayed 6 months." or "George Lucas admits he's a bad director."

  40. how stupid by ceswiedler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, we have a galaxy (far far away) with at least a few thousand planets. Each planet would presumably have on the order of 1-10 billion inhabitants. So what are the chances that:

    1. a "remote" planet called Tatooine continually becomes vitally important to the fate of the galaxy, time and time again?

    2. The same five to ten characters coincidentally reappear, time and time again? C-3PO was actually made by Anakin and just happened to be on the ship that was attacked near Tatooine and end up on Luke's farm? Now Chewbacca is going to show up, as a "coincidence?"

    I suppose you could make arguments about the 'Force' making these coincidences happen. But you have to admit that's retro-explanations. Everything in Episodes 4-6 indicated that these characters were meeting for the first time, with no prior history. Now Lucas (and Star Wars fanboys) want to convince us that "no, really there's a whole previous story with these characters, which was never alluded to in the 'later' episodes."

    It just goes to show what a crap storyteller Lucas is these days. How he got that way, I don't know. But Star Wars these days is about as well-written as the Daredevil movie.

    1. Re:how stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In my experience, there is no such thing like" coincidence.

      "You don't believe in the Force, do you?"

    2. Re:how stupid by ThogScully · · Score: 1, Insightful
      1. There are many stories in the Star Wars universe. Read the books and you'll follow lots of stories unrelated to the characters you're familiar with. They'll pop up of course when they are big and political and famous, but you'll learn about all those other billions of people of which you speak.

      2. The previous stories connecting characters was alluded to in the original trilogy, but never was told flat out. Now he's telling it. And because the prequels are a story of how those same 5 characters all came to be in the positions they were for Ep4, it only makes sense that the prequels concentrate on stories in the same locales.

      3. Quit trolling your distaste in the movies. It's unfounded and offtopic.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    3. Re:how stupid by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that Lucas wrote the prequels years after the original, so he keeps trying too hard to 'tie them to the original'.

      Remember the Babylon 5 prequel TV-movies, where we had major charachters from the series bumping into each other left and right, despite the fact that they supposedly didn't know each other when they 'first met' on the series? This despite the fact that J. Micheal Straczynski is a much better writer than Lucas. I think this sort of thing is a problem with prequels in general...

    4. Re:how stupid by outsider007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you even understand the concept of a saga? heroes are larger than life and unlikely things happen. if you can't deal with that you can go watch something else

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    5. Re:how stupid by thelexx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. The books are not what most people would consider any sort of canon to be drawn from for future movies. Boils down to: % of people who've seen the prior movies (huge) vs. % of people who would have read some random SW 'universe' book (tiny).

      2. "The previous stories connecting characters was alluded to in the original trilogy" -- Please be specific.

      3. Offtopic perhaps, though most of the criticism levelled at the last two movies has been far from unfounded. For me, the root of the matter lies in the fact that while the original movies appealed to me both as a child (SW came out when I was eight) and as an adult, the most recent ones lack the ability to appeal to me as an adult, even with a starting handicap of goodwill from the originals. And I really, really do not think it's just nostalgia that makes me like the originals as an adult and to be able to keep watching them once a year or so, as there are other shows and movies that I'm very nostalgic over yet almost cannot bear to watch at all now. Battlestar Galactica is the prime example. Or how about Knight Rider? Embarrassingly, I do remember actually liking that show when I was a kid. Now it actually induces pain and blackouts! ;) Rant over, just been carrying these thoughts for a while.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    6. Re:how stupid by dswensen · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I'd say these coincidences are every bit as possible as every other preposterous thing that happens in the Star Wars movies -- planet-destroying superlasers, swords made out of light, teddy bears defeating trained military soldiers, mercenaries with hearts of gold, telekinesis, precognition, neurotic androids, spaceships that move in complete violation of Newtonian physics while making whooshing sounds in airless space -- a few characters showing up more often than usual seems pretty trite by comparison.

    7. Re:how stupid by bigdavex · · Score: 4, Funny

      C-3PO was actually made by Anakin and just happened to be on the ship that was attacked near Tatooine and end up on Luke's farm? Now Chewbacca is going to show up, as a "coincidence?"

      I think you have a very insightful point here. For me, the galaxy stopped feeling big after Empire. There are lots of examples:
      Why the hell was Lando suddenly a general? Didn't the rebels have a command structure.

      But . . . I think the particular example of the droids showing up at Tatooine has an explanation. Leia is taking the plans to Obi-wan. Obi-wan intentionally lives near Luke.

      The real head-scratcher is why would Luke be on Tatooine. Yeah, his uncle's there, but your step-father's house doesn't seem like the best place to hide someone, given the whole galaxy to choose from.

      Somebody once suggested that Obi-wan and Vader are really in league (against the emperor and Yoda, the latter of which I think is a real stretch.)

      But try this on for size:

      Suppose Obiwan and Vader are really in league against the Emperor in episodes 4-6.

      Consider this --
      • Sometime after episode 2, Obiwan "hides" Luke on Vader's *home planet*. At his step father's house.

      • Vader "intercepts" a rebel ship, and then his daughter and droids leave with the plans to the Death Star.

      • Vader and Obiwan's duel distracts the Storm Troopers, allowing the heroes to escape the Death Star on the Falcon.

      • All of Imperials on the Death Star die except for the super-human pilot Vader, who "crashes" into his wingman, freeing up the shot for his son.

      • In episode 5, Vader shows he's a heartless SOB . . . by choking to death a slew of Imperial officers and sending the Imperial fleet into an astroid
        field.

      • In episode 6, Vader consciously allows the rebels to land on the moon of Endor.

      • On the new Death Star, Vader says a bunch of things to Luke that don't support this hypothesis, so please ignore them.

      • Vader, in the Jedi tradition, throws the emperor down A Really Big Hole.
      --
      -Dave
    8. Re:how stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. In the last two films, Lucas has basically gone into marketing mode. He's got the "keep your kids from whining by plopping them in front of the tv set with the latest cutesy-cutesy Disney video" mindset. That and the "appeal to the 20-35yr old bracket with plenty of sentimental references to the first trilogy" mindset. Not to mention the "pre-pubescent girls dig 19 year olds who wear lots of mousse in their hair and look like members of a boy band" mindset and the "let's appeal to the typical 16 yr old male wanker who goes ga-ga at the sight of a belly button and loves obsessing over the color of his favorite Jedi's lightsaber" mindset.

    9. Re:how stupid by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      "On the new Death Star, Vader says a bunch of things to Luke that don't support this hypothesis, so please ignore them."

      But yeah, as I was reading your points, I was thinking the above, so it's pretty hard to ignore them in order to believe your hypothesis sticks. Still, it would be cool to think that was what was supposed to be happening (and then, I dunno, Vader was saying all that to Luke because he was afraid the Emperor was listening. Oh, and he chopped luke's hand off because he had bad aim and tried to miss.)

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    10. Re:how stupid by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Lucas will tie that up.
      I also think several other thing will be tied up such as why the Jedi all look angry whenever they fight.

      However I have no hope for the acting or the dialog.
      This will be the first star wars movie I won't see on opening night.

      Well, in the EP4 Han and Chewie are already together, CP-30 and R2-D2 are together(which makes sense since they are telling the story). Obi-one knows uncle owen and aunt baru.

      Was there a prestory to EP4? hard to be sure. I do know it wasn't originally called EP4, but Lucas must have had a reason to change it. Lucas had said, before Empire, that there where 9 movies.(He has said there will not be 9 movies)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:how stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coincidences are perhaps possible but it surely lowers the story to "Days of our lives" level.

    12. Re:how stupid by Nikkos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "So what are the chances that:

      1. a "remote" planet called Tatooine continually becomes vitally important to the fate of the galaxy, time and time again?"

      The idea is that most rebellions and/or anarchists groups are found in remote parts of a country or city (militants in Montana, criminals in seedy warehouse-district bars)

      Look at tatooine - it's not a tourist destination, it's a backwater shithole where people depend on collecting morning dew for water, and have barely enough technology to survive. They use pack-animals for cryin out loud.

      "2. The same five to ten characters coincidentally reappear, time and time again? C-3PO was actually made by Anakin and just happened to be on the ship that was attacked near Tatooine and end up on Luke's farm? Now Chewbacca is going to show up, as a "coincidence?""

      Yep, C-3PO was made by Anakin - most fans knew that by reading the books long before the new series came out.

      As for the droids - they just "happened" to be on a _rebel_ ship heading to tattooine looking for old friend and ally Obi-Wan-Kenobi. Didn't you ever wonder why R2 seemed to know where he was going/what he was doing?

      Regarding Chewy, in the books it mentions that wookies live a long time (hundreds of years I believe) Chewy is a smuggler, remember from the first movie that he and Han had a history on Tattoine. Or, it could be something else.

      Ya also gotta remember that while there are billions of beings, probably only a small percentage have the money/means to travel. (Anakin never would have gotten off the planet without help) that would increase the odds those people meeting eachother.

      I believe the Antilles name was dropped somewhere in the first two prequels, so Wedge doesn't have to introduce himself.

      It doesn't seem to be much of a suprise that the prequel to a movie about Luke, his mentor Obi-Wan, his pair of droids (who are longtime friends), his grotesquely evil father Darth Vader, and a hot princess who's his sister, would be a story about his parents, where the droids came from/how they met, how obi-wan was trained, and how Darth Vader came to be.

      "Everything in Episodes 4-6 indicated that these characters were meeting for the first time, with no prior history"

      Yes and No. I'm sure Chewy and Han didn't know Luke. Though greater (lesser?) fanboys could speculate on and on about Chewy keeping quiet/the force or what not. As for the Droids, they seems familier with eachother right off (to me anyway)

      As for the first two prequels, I agree that they were not as good as hoped. I'm just arguing that the "plausability" (disregarding spaceships, aliens, etc) hasn't been stretched that far.

      Nikkos

      ---
      So what if I'm a fanboy, I can bench 220 and run 1 1/2 miles without stopping, I'm allowed.

    13. Re:how stupid by macrom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know man! It's soooooo lame. Just like this Lord of the Rings thing. I mean, there's this huge, gigantic place called Middle Earth, and all we get to see are some stupid midgets with hairy feet walking around. All for some stupid ring that you could buy at Wal-Mart for $10. And these stupid old men with sticks that keep fighting by flinging each other in the air. And walking, talking trees! I mean, what the hell kind of drugs were they smoking?

      I really don't know who invents these stories, but they must be a bunch of unintelligent idiots. I mean, I can't WAIT for "Pirates of the Caribbean" to come out. Now THERE'S an original story. You just don't find good quality screenplays like that anymore.

    14. Re:how stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get why people keep bringing up the fact that Luke was hiding out somewhere Darth knew. What evidence is there that Vader was looking for Luke, or even knew he had a son, before Episode IV?

    15. Re:how stupid by ahoehn · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's the force. It brings them together. They all have the correct mydochlorian signature for maximum commercial gain or something. I'm sure it's in one of the books somewhere.

      Geez, some people.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    16. Re:how stupid by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 1

      I think those are simply examples of hackneyed writing than some brilliant, subtle plan of Lucas's.

    17. Re:how stupid by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'll agree Lucas certainly isn't the greatest storyteller ever (even at the height of his creative powers, he wasn't the best, though he was good, and lately he's nowhere near his own personal best, unfortunately), but not all of what you mention is actually a problem:

      1. Tatooine is important because the story arc's central overall character(s), Anakin / Vader, comes from there, and hence has many connections there. Anakin's mom Shmi was left there when Qui-Gon freed Anakin and took him away to be trained as a Jedi; some moisture farmer (Cliegg Lars) with a son from some prior relationship (Owen) frees her from Watto and marries her, thus joining the Lars and Skywalker families; when the events of Episode III occur and Anakin becomes Vader, Anakin's kids are taken away and one of them (Luke) is placed in the care of his only relatives (Owen and Beru Lars, his aunt and uncle via Shmi's marriage to Cliegg). Obi-Wan goes into hiding on Tatooine, presumably to keep an eye on promising young Force-sensitive Luke; Leia is separated from her brother to keep their enemies from easily getting both of them at the same time, placed in the care of a respected leader on Alderaan who'll ensure that she's brought up to become the kind of person who'll oppose the disturbing political events of the times (the rise of the Empire). Years later, she's active in the rebellion, and seeks Obi-Wan's help, which takes her ship to Tatooine. She can't get to Obi-Wan, but Artoo and Threepio can; they and Luke seek passage off the planet, hiring a smuggler hanging out in a cantina. Said smuggler has connections to a crime boss on the planet, which is what eventually leads to everybody going back to Tatooine one last time to rescue Han from former employer Jabba. All this proceeds naturally enough; the only really remarkable coincidences here are that a) the sandcrawler which picked up Artoo and Threepio wound up selling them to the family connected to the person they were trying to see, instead of some other random moisture farmers, and b) the crime boss who becomes involved in this story later on happened to preside over the race in which Anakin won his freedom. Since even this second coincidence isn't a big deal (both because Jabba, being one of the most powerful and well-connected people on Tatooine, might naturally be asked to lend his presence to various local civic events there, and because his presence at the race doesn't really affect the story one way or another anyway), it all boils down to Artoo and Threepio being lucky enough to fall into the right hands - and since the resourceful Artoo could reasonably be expected to succeed at his mission to find Obi-Wan even if he'd been sold to someone else, I can buy it.

      2. See above re: Threepio's return to Tatooine; as the property of Anakin, Threepio naturally winds up in the service of the Naboo Royal Family when Anakin marries into it, which (presumably) leads to his service to that of Alderaan when one of Amidala's children, Leia, is placed in that family's care.

      The idea here is that Artoo, Threepio, Anakin / Vader, Amidala, Leia, Obi-Wan, Shmi, Owen, Beru, et al. are already connected to one another in some way by the end of Episode III and/or the beginning of Episode IV. Coincidence only gets really heavy when it starts having other characters with whom they deal with in the prequels, like Jango and Boba Fett, wind up having their own series of connections that branch off in some other direction but then lead back to reconnect them with this core group of heroes a couple decades later. Chewbacca showing up in Episode III is more of that, and I think it's probably too much, but all the stuff concerning Anakin & Padmé, their children, Obi-Wan, the droids, and Tatooine is reasonable.

      The basic plotting is good; the real problem is that Lucas's dialogue and humor are increasingly awful, and he doesn't direct actors well. He also adds to the prequels' shortcomings by tossing in minor narrative elements that revise or add-on to the existing lore in ways that seem to fly in the face of what went before (midi-chlorians, Artoo's sudden ability to fly, etc.) and aren't even needed for the storylines.

    18. Re:how stupid by Snaller · · Score: 1

      a "remote" planet called Tatooine continually becomes vitally important to the fate of the galaxy, time and time again?

      The spice must flow!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    19. Re:how stupid by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      This present message reflects my personal opinions. It is not intended to represent the views of my Employer.

      There is somthing horribly ironic in seeing that sig after a long post on the Star Wars universe.

    20. Re:how stupid by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Read the prologue to the novel Star Wars. It has the basic Palpatine story arc layed out, and there are hints in all the novelizations that the stormtroopers are clones and that Boba Fett is a clone. The original Star Wars script was entitled "The Journal of the Whills," making it clear that the two droids were the central characters. Most of the broad strokes are there in the backstory to EP 4-6; only the details were added later. (Of course, it is the details which have made the two new movies disappointing.)

    21. Re:how stupid by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Vader and Obiwan's duel distracts the Storm Troopers, allowing the heroes to escape the Death Star on the Falcon.

      not only that, but vader most likely KNEW that if he were to strike Obi Wan down, he'd become part of the Force and become a bigger asset to Luke than a living Obi Wan could ever be.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    22. Re:how stupid by kalidasa · · Score: 1
      None. The evidence is in Episode V, when Vader says that the Emperor has foreseen that "the son of Skywalker" would be strong in the Force. Thing is, I think Vader knows all along where Luke is. He just doesn't know 1. that Obi-Wan is there too, and 2. that he has a daughter, too, hiding on Alderaan. It seems a little odd that Vader doesn't immediately recognize that Leia (whom he's obviously met before; remember Leia claims she should have recognized Vader's "stench") is his daughter, probably because Lucas had not yet decided that Jedi Knights should be celibate and saw Leia as a love interest for Luke, not a sister. But let's face it, Harrison Ford was a much more believable romantic lead, and making Jedi celibate gave him an explanation for Anakin's slide into darkness (love).

      No, the prequels, and ROTJ, too, were not well written, and there are major continuity problems across the board that can only be explained with silliness like the "made the Kessel run in 12 parsecs" explanation. Why did Obi-Wan, when he was trying to be familiar with Vader, call him "Darth." Darth is a title, but Obi-Wan uses it like a first name. Maybe Luke's real name was supposed to be Luke Vader, or maybe Lucas didn't come up with the idea that Vader was Luke's father until after he finished the first movie.

    23. Re:how stupid by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. But the prequels still SUCKED.

    24. Re:how stupid by blamblamblam · · Score: 1
      There is a similar, albeit less complete explication of the same theory on David Brin's website.

      Of course, Brinn is just messing around. He thinks if Episode 3 is wrapped up in this fashion, with some kind of bargain between Obi-Wan and Vader against the Emperor (and Yoda, because Brin is a crusty ol' ninny and hates Yoda--I mean, come on now...), then basically, it would be really dope and clever. I personally feel that if they just use an artful combination of animatronics, costume design, and spectacular space and martial arts battles, it'll all fall into place. Take the first and last 20 minutes of Return of the Jedi. Make that into a 30-minute TV special, and you've got yourself the greatest half hour of film ever created. I attest.

    25. Re:how stupid by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      "Or how about Knight Rider? Embarrassingly, I do remember actually liking that show when I was a kid. Now it actually induces pain and blackouts! ;) "

      Kit's gonna run you over, boy!!!

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
    26. Re:how stupid by naasking · · Score: 1

      On the new Death Star, Vader says a bunch of things to Luke that don't support this hypothesis, so please ignore them.

      You could say that after 20+ years of acting evil, Vader got into the habit of being evil and perhaps even believed he was. Over the years, the emperor could have worn him down, and this would explain his comments about "the power of the darkside" and "I must obey my master". The appearance of Luke reminded him of his original goals.

    27. Re:how stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explained? A parsec is a distance (a parallax second, where the second is a measure of angle).

      That Darth Vader was Luke's father was almost certainly decided before episode 4, either that or there was some other interesting story planned regarding Luke's father - consider the things Owen and Obi-wan say about him.

    28. Re:how stupid by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I'm well aware of what a parsec is - it is the distance at which an observed object must be located for observations 1 au apart to show an apparent motion against the background, or parallax, of the object to subtend one second of arc. Unfortunately, when he wrote that line, Lucas wasn't. He now claims that the what Han meant is that he managed to shave a few parsecs off the distance of the Kessel run (apparently unaware that one can almost always travel in a perfectly straight line in space, if you have the unlimited Delta vee science fiction writers always have).

      Everything that Owen and Obi-Wan says about Luke's father points to his father having gone on some fool quest with Obi-Wan and gotten himself killed.

    29. Re:how stupid by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Sorry I didn't provide the reference. I couldn't remember where I read this.

      I'd appreciate it if someone with mod points could moderate the parent up.

      --
      -Dave
  41. Hmm? by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think his re-appearance in this film is a fitting way to tie the whole saga together, especially for Wookiee fans."

    Umm. There's Wookie fans?

    Is this a fetish thing?

    And I thought this was wierd... :-)

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Hmm? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      Umm. There's Wookie fans?

      Umm. As Wookie is one of the best UK garage artists, I'm sure he has a lot of fans. By the way, why should it be a fetish thing?

      Oh, you were talking about the other Wookie...

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  42. That's R2...... by Pete+Brubaker · · Score: 1

    .....you insensitive clod!!!

    --
    What's a sig? Pete Brubaker
  43. Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... after all, given Lucas's dialogue of late, the greater the percentage of characters in a prequel who don't speak English, the better... ;-)

    In seriousness, though, I'm not wild about this; I love Chewie as much as anyone, but to tie him to the storyline at this early point and then just happen to have him intersect with it again in the classic trilogy just pushes coincidence too far, IMO. Characters like Obi-Wan, Anakin / Vader, Luke, Leia, Artoo and Threepio, Yoda, Owen, Beru, etc. who have some connection to the royal houses of Naboo and / or Alderaan and / or the Skywalker family legacy make sense for inclusion in the prequels, but for characters from other circles (Han, Chewie, Lando, Jabba, Boba, etc.) who weren't already established in the originals as being connected to them to suddenly turn out to have some prior connection after all shrinks the Star Wars universe a little too much, I think (but then, that's hardly the biggest problem with the prequels...).

    *sigh* Oh, well. I'll still see it, I'm sure, and I hope it's better than the first two (hey, it's possible, right?), and I similarly hope Chewie's return / "debut" is either handled in a plausible way, or is simply good enough not to object to (or better yet, both). I guess we'll see...

    1. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by 0divide · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree--I think it's more of a ploy than anything else. Sure, Chewie's supposed to be 200 years old, so fine, it fits. It still feels forced (sorry) and a bit trite.

      Of course, it's impossible to know the context in which he will appear, but if Obi-Wan meets Chewbacca, then perhaps when we meet him in Star Wars, he's suffering from Alzheimer's or something. He's already met R2 but forgotten (unless there's a wink wink nudge nudge that we're supposed to imply) and if he meets Chewbacca for the first time..

      ah, well, that doesn't matter. I must admit I find it hard to care as well, but I guess I feel like still care enough to watch one more film on opening night.

      It just seems a bit desperate, I guess--"hey, look, remember 'Star Wars'? It's still cool, Right??"

      --
      ---mike
    2. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just as a point of note, Jabba was in ep 1. Recall he was in control at the pod races.

      Boba is the son of Jenga, who is the model for all the Storm Trooper clones.

      In other words, the only members of the other circles who haven't been involved are Han and Chewie. Time to bring them in.

      Recall from ep 4, and 6, Obi Wan took the son of Anakin to the one place he was sure that Anakin would never return to.

      It would not surprise me if Chewie turns out to have been a slave to Jaba and Obi Wan, or even Anakin frees him. It would explain his antipathy towards the cuffs in ep 4.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to tie him to the storyline at this early point and then just happen to have him intersect with it again in the classic trilogy just pushes coincidence too far

      You think this was done for storyline purposes? It was done to increase the nostalgia, plain and simple. He knows that fans of the original aren't too keen on the prequels, and he's adding a quick fix to bump up their enjoyment of the film, because he either doesn't know what else to do, or he doesn't care enough to put the thought into improving the story properly.

    4. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just as a point of note, Jabba was in ep 1. Recall he was in control at the pod races. Boba is the son of Jenga, who is the model for all the Storm Trooper clones.

      I know; that's actually exactly the sort of thing I was talking about. For many years, before Episode I actually got made, one could naturally assume that Obi-Wan, Artoo, Threepio, Yoda, Anakin, Vader, Palpatine, Owen, Beru, (infant) Luke, (infant) Leia, Luke & Leia's mother (whom we now know as Amidala), and the then-unseen Bail Organa (Alderaanian viceroy and Leia's adoptive father; played in Attack of the Clones by Jimmy Smits) were all likely going to be in the prequels, but other characters (such as Han, Chewie, Lando, Jabba, Boba, etc.) were unlikely to be in them, since they had no apparent connection to the Skywalker family prior to Obi-Wan's hiring of Han and Chewie in the cantina. However, the prequels have now revealed prior connections between Chewie, Jabba, and Boba and the Skywalker lineage and its various friends, enemies, mentors, etc., making the encounter in the cantina a bizarre coincidence. That's not to say it couldn't happen, but it does stretch credibility a bit; however, if Episode III is done well enough, I won't mind.

    5. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He knows that fans of the original aren't too keen on the prequels, and he's adding a quick fix to bump up their enjoyment of the film
      Many will argue that it is just this sort of action that CAUSED the lack of care for the prequels by the original fans. Just as cutesy two headed sports announcer in the first and the meeting of R2D2 and C3PO many fans felt like real substance was replaced by ploys and marketting oriented cameos. The whole idea of a Galactic Empire with all the wonderous planets, locations, races and technological variants has been pretty much shrunk into a minor story about some power hungry old man with magic powers and a naive group of tribal elders.

      Many of the books went into pretty good detail about the internal Republic and Jedi corruption and Big Government impotence and how that provided the backdrop for division. Here we have very simplistic glossing of that situation for the movie, or put another way "dumbing it down." I wish for a Star Wars along the lines of Tom Clancy not Dr. Zeus.

    6. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's already met R2 but forgotten (unless there's a wink wink nudge nudge that we're supposed to imply) and if he meets Chewbacca for the first time..

      To be fair he's presumably met lots of robots and I can't see that he's likely to have memorised all the serial numbers in case he runs into them again.

    7. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why care about a storyline that makes sense when you have a special effects studio that can seduce the drone-like sheeple?

    8. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      Before ep 1, you didn't know that anakin made C3PO and that R2D2 used to work on leia's mum's royal yacht. Before ep 2, you didn't know that boba fett was ny more than a minor bad guy with a few minutes screen time and ten seconds of speech in "return of the jedi".

      So, saying he "isn't connected" is bogus, you don't know til you find out.

    9. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      Doh yeah, and I forgot boba fett was in "empire strikes back" too (it's not my favourite one). Still semingly no more than a minor bad guy though.

    10. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      R2D2 is one of a line of identical robots (scads of em in the naboo royal ship for example), but C3PO is a custom job by his protege and one he'd be unlikely to forget, especially re-meeting him in pieces (C3PO's usual condition ;-). But he was faking to be "old ben the hermit" at the time, so the innocent act makes sense.

      Too much star wars geekness, I know.

    11. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      ... C3PO is a custom job by his protege...

      What about in the first scene of A New Hope in the rebel ship, where there is a C3PO look-alike walking the halls...or was that in Lando's flying city in The Empire Strikes Back (havent seen them in a long time...more than a year)? Seems to me I recall other droids very similar to C3PO in the custody of the Jawas in ep4. I'm not intending to prove you worng, I'm just wondering if it was his speech processing skills that make him unique, or if it was never intended for look-alikes to show up in the first movies...

    12. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

      Really? probably it was a continuty goofup. But one could probably get away with explaining it as: he custom built C3PO, but out of fairly industry standard scrap parts.

    13. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that all the look-alikes had a silver exterior. So I guess he designed a translating mechanism out of industry standard parts, painted it gold and called it unique. Sounds like many large coprs.

    14. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Threepio is assembled from standard protocol droid parts; there are a number of them of the standard design throughout the films. Anakin didn't build him from scratch; he just used various protocol droid parts as he came by them, which is why Threepio was still incomplete in Episode I. For many years it was understood, from Lucas's own original notes, that Threepio was supposedly 112 years old at the time of the original movie (Episode IV: A New Hope), and Luke was his 43rd master; Lucas revised the character's original backstory a bit when he decided to make him Anakin's childhood construction project, but even now, according to the lore, Anakin began Threepio from a basic droid frame that was already 80 years old by the time he got it, which fits the original chronology (TPM takes place 32 years before ANH; 80 + 32 = 112).

      Argh, please shoot me. I think I'm beyond help at this point.

    15. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Oh, well. I'll still see it, I'm sure, and I hope it's better than the first two (hey, it's possible, right?),

      Only theoretically... when you read about Hollywood one thing that seems clear is that movies are made by comities. Everybody has an opinion and most of those have a lawyer as well. And there is always Someone above you that changes something. Actors, directors, producers, money men, the studio people. I think when Lucas was mostly an lucky unknown who got his movie StarWars producers, he was constantly overruled on a lot of things, so the resultant movie became the product of a synergy, something created by a lot of different people. Something that would be difficult to recreate once these people were splitting up. NOW he's rich and famous, and he gets everything HIS way - just him - and as it turns out .. he just haven't got it - nor the humility to let someone else take on some of the chores, someone else who could it better - Peter Jackson he ain't. So theoretically it could be better... but in reality...

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    16. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by 0divide · · Score: 1

      I guess, but he DOES say he did not remember owning a droid...so he does try to think of a droid named "R2"--but yeah, I can see your point. And I guess he never "really" owned R2, but he seemed to hang out with him a lot.

      But perhaps R2 could have said, "Hey Obi Wan, what's up? Haven't seen you in years"---but we will never know.

      ever.

      (and I won't tell anyone about the star wars geekiness if you don't)

      --
      ---mike
    17. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by 0divide · · Score: 1

      WOW!

      You have any idea of how many people will know these facts after I "slip them in" whilst I wait in line for the third film?

      That's amazing. 112 years old, Luke was 43rd master.

      fantastic. well done.

      (so much for keeping the replies in keeping with the original post.)

      But I am just going to assume that, at some point, C-3PO gets his memory wiped so he doesn't remember Luke, Tatooine, Obi-Wan, etc.

      when in doubt, memory wipe!

      --
      ---mike
    18. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Yeah, pretty sad of me to actually *know* that stuff, right?

      What's worse, apparently that is indeed what's going to happen (memory wipe) - Lucas said it in an interview not too long ago about Episode III. I'd much rather he came up with a clever explanation that fit (and one could in fact be done), but it looks like he's taking the easy way out. Damn it.

      *sigh*

    19. Re:Hey, it could bode *well* for the movie... by 0divide · · Score: 1

      it's cool man--what are you gonna do? it's instinct to want to gather information on this. the psychic/mental baggage that will be released once the third film is released will be mighty indeed. I feel the powers of all my brain will be finally unLEASED for the first time in 33 years (can I be that old when that damn movie comes out??)

      anyway, slightly off topic--Xmen 2 is fantastic.

      (memory wipe--well, we all knew it was coming. literally a deus ex machina!)

      --
      ---mike
  44. Definition: Pulling a chewbacca by Oopsz · · Score: 2, Funny

    (verb) see: Jump the shark.

    1. Re:Definition: Pulling a chewbacca by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Hehe, jump the shark.

      At least they haven't all moved to southern California.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  45. After the poor impression Episode I made on me... by DeepEyes78 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    ...I stopped caring.

    P.S. Han shoots first!

  46. HOLY ^&@#%^#%!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one word: AWESOME!!!!!!!

    who wants to celebrate this? im throwing a star wars party pronto!

  47. Lucas' new "vision." by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Lucas' new "vision."

    Vision? There's a vision? I was pretty certain that crap like ep 1, 2, and prolly 3, COULDN'T possibly be planned. I was under the impression Lucas was making this shit up as he went along. And, IMHO, even though special effects have come a long way, most of what they're not so good yet they can make crap look good. I watched Empire the other day, and couldn't help but think how timeless it was, and how much better a movie it was than ep 1 & 2 rolled together.

  48. Wanna hear another spoiler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that not only will chewbaca be in this episode (an by the way from the parts i've seen, they seem to have really skimped on SFX, and have some really bad lighting in this one):

    I heard that the real reason that anakin becomes darth vader is because he finds that chewbaca is giving it "raw-dog", as the kids say, to the princess, and we also find out what we knew all along: that c3po is gay and tries to make a move on r2d2. Anyways, some pretty sick stuff and zaniness ensues including some fisting and using a light saber handle in a way that would make yoda squirm.

    On second thought, this might have been one of those disturbing, yet arousing star wars spoofing pornos that i like to watch from time to time. If so, sorry about the false spoiler chaps!

  49. Hmm. by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... this seems to me to be the second time they've used Chewbacca to "spice up" the series, so to speak. The first time was in the book Vector Prime, where Chewbacca became the first/only one of the surviving heroes from Episodes 4-6 to be killed off. Now, they're putting him in Episode III... *shrug*

    I'd ask why, but I already know the answer. Money. *sigh* More and more I'm inclined to agree that Lucas SHOULD have allowed Spielberg to direct Episode III...

    Just my $.02...

  50. Thank you Comic Book Guy... by kingkade · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...you forgot to mention:

    - How bad the other movies somehow failed to live up to every one of your impossible expectations
    - How much you hate Jar-jar
    - How George Lucas should listen to your creepy emails.
    - How he should please you and the rest of the mostly conflicting opinions of every guy who went to the movies and fancies themselves a critic.
    - To declare "[Will be] worst episode ever!"
    - You'd make his vision of his creation of his universe so so much better.

  51. As thought by most post-1977 people... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    "This looks to be just another Matrix Rip off"

  52. there is a reason for any plot hole in SW! by QEDog · · Score: 1

    It must be the midiclorians!

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  53. Re:I bet the movie still lacks a two major charact by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    You thought II was worse than I? You don't get out much, do you?

  54. oh and... by kingkade · · Score: 1

    ...of course: how i should have used a unordered list instead of pedestrian hyphens. Ack, choking on ...your...ow..own...outrage!

  55. Solo by Apreche · · Score: 1

    Jabba the Hut: Bitch of a Wookie Chewbacca.

    (he actually says this at one point)

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  56. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you are.

    Deal.

    1. Re:yes by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Lol, relax. I just meant anyone who would be interested in Star Wars already is. You introduce people to things that are at least slightly obscure. Like Mr. Show. I introduce people to it all the time. Great show. But, I assure you, there isn't anyone left to introduce Star Wars to.

      Maybe I should've been more clear.

    2. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you're forgetting the millions of children who weren't born when Star Wars came out?

    3. Re:yes by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      No, in fact, I'm not. I wasn't born was Star Wars came out. I was born after Return of the Jedi came out.

  57. Three words: by kingkade · · Score: 1

    Horrible lightsaber accident.

    Any other cool ideas on how to have chewy (or anyone) take out Jar-Jar. Just of fun of course, I love the cuddly little bastard (as long as he doesn't take up too much screen time).

    1. Re:Three words: by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Light saber accident? Too quick and painless. Hey, I know, Chewie could lock him up in a torture chamber with a revolver, a box of ammunition, and episode 1 and 2 playing on a TV behind bulletproof glass. When suicide eventually comes, he will hate himself more than any of us can possibly imagine.

    2. Re:Three words: by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

      Too quick and painless

      Not if the unlit saber is, erm, crammed somewhere.

      "Meesa swear by da gods, Doctor ... meesa no have no idea how thisn got in dere!"

  58. Favorite wookie? by s20451 · · Score: 1

    I dunno ... my favorite wookie is Chewbacca's father, Itchy, who appeared in the Star Wars Holiday Special, along with Chewie's wife, Molla, and his son, Lumpy. There was also an appearance by Bea Arthur, but the word is that she was not actually playing a Wookie.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  59. Re:Shameless Hucksterism-Time travel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're throwing in Chewie because:

    a) Lucas ran out of ideas a long damn time ago.
    b) Characters from the original trilogy sell better than characters from this one.
    c) Hey. Don't complain. Could have been Ewoks..."

    Actually since he's working from before the first original forward. It's inevitable that a wookie would show up. Why not chewbacca?

  60. Han Solo and Chewie by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    What I want to see is Harrision Solo come back for Episode III and play Han Solo's father with Chewie. I think that'd be a marvelous plot twist. Maybe have his dad be a CorSec officer or something - i don't know how the novels portray him.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Han Solo and Chewie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, no, no. Christopher Walken to play Han Solo's dad!

    2. Re:Han Solo and Chewie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it would be kind of cool if Chewie turns out to be Han Solo's father. See, just before she died, Shmi visited that bar in Mos Eisley, met Chewbacca there, and got drunk. Lucas could add in scenes to the first three films showing a computer enhanced Han Solo wondering why he has to shave his hands, chest, and face so often.

  61. What A Wookie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He's a bad mother..."

    "Shut yo' mouth!"

    "Hey man, I'm jus' talkin' 'bout Chewbacca..."

    Chewbacca's triumphant return heralds the most important plot connection between the previous chapters of Star Wars and the current releases. If the theme of the storyline is man vs. society, the context of Star Wars is really "Chewbacca vs. The Universe".

    From a young wookie combing his hair to impress the wookettes, Chewbacca rose to stardom by being the centerpiece of a rebel foce intent on freeing the universe. Unlike Luke Skywalker and Han Solo, however, Chewbacca never sought the glory, prefering to stand in the backrow of the medal presentation ceremony and let the humanoids accept the fame and stardome.

    His absence in the prequal sequence up until now illustrates the plot being too immature for the reintroduction of his character. With this third episode, the connector between past and present, coming to bear, we are finally ready for the unabashed glory of the true Jedi...

    Chewbacca. What a wookie.

    This calls for celebration. Everyone please don your bandaleers and speak wookie in bed to your girlfriends (or, as possibly more fitting for the slashdot crowd, your LAN-party tablemates and/or everquest buddies). Nothing turns a woman (gamer/elf) on like wookie nookie.

    and for all those claiming George Lucas bastardized the spirit of the Jedi with the recent releases, please remember he is a storyteller telling the story he wants to tell. He is not playing to the market (as much as it may seem) and he is not playing to the Star Wars Corps; he is writing the movie he wants to write.

    nuckcl@yahoo!.com (take out that ! to mail me)

  62. Star Wars is as DEAD as Lucas's creativity by coltrane679 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever favorable opinion you may have had of the original series, Lucas is completely creatively bankrupt now, not an unusual development for creative types. Does anyone on the planet think Francis Ford Coppela is still as creative as he was in the 70s (Godfather I & II, The Conversation, Apocalyse Now)? Why is it surprising that Lucas has suffered the same fate? Unfortunately, he has total control over SW and thus has dragged the franchise down with him. Too bad a Peter Jackson could not be entrusted with such a project, but, as his right, Lucas is intent on taking his baby to the grave with him.

  63. Totally inconsistent. by jcsehak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd rather see chewbacca appear in a romantic comedy with sandra bullock

    Well, at least there'd be more chemistry than in Episode II.

    I agree. It was contrived enough that he had Anakin make 3PO, and it just HAPPENED that Boba Fett, the most popular bounty hunter, was chosen to be a model for the clones. Is he even capable of creating new characters? Oh yeah, Darth Maul. He was cool. Except Lucas fleshed out his character like Kate Moss trapped in a 1-dimensional universe.

    And you know, if he wants to maintain some consistency with the first two, he wouldn't use an actor at all for Chewbacca, just some fidgety CGI model.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Totally inconsistent. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > > It was contrived enough that he had Anakin make 3PO

      I agree, but it seemed obvious that he didn't make him so much as repair him from a bunch of parts of other protocol droids. That, as a child, he "invented" the standard Goldenrod(TM) brand of protocol droid seen all over the place 60 years in the future is ludicrous.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    2. Re:Totally inconsistent. by operagost · · Score: 1
      That would be, Boba Fett's dad was chosen to be the model.

      It was a good way of explaining why he wore that funny armor.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Totally inconsistent. by mizzy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What's inconsistent is assuming that Anakin must have *invented* the protocol droid based on the fact that he built one.

      Are we to assume that he invented the rest of the stuff in Watto's shop too?

      Anyway... back to the topic at hand... I hope the movie deals with how Chewie and Han became partners, and that Chewie has to learn how to put together protocol droids so he'll know how to fix 3PO later. BUT WAIT... NO... that would mean...

      --
      =================== Pretty? Feh. Shiny? Feh. A Jedi craves not these things.
    4. Re:Totally inconsistent. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>I hope the movie deals with how Chewie and Han became partners, and that Chewie has to learn how to put together protocol droids

      Chewbacca was an imperial slave before Han Solo rescued him. Perhaps we'll see his enslavement. I can't be sure if we'll see young Naval Officer Han Solo rescue hime though. At the time of Episode 2, I estimate that Solo was between 5 an 10 years old. So if Ep 3 takes place 10 years later, you've got a 15 to 20 year old Solo. That's a big stretch of time for a human.

      But I think I can guess that we'll see Chewie as a slave. That sounds pretty reasonable to me.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Totally inconsistent. by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      That, as a child, he "invented" the standard Goldenrod(TM) brand of protocol droid seen all over the place 60 years in the future is ludicrous.

      He didn't "invent" such a droid, and even Lucas doesn't claim he did. The droid that escorted Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan onto the Trade Federation ship was just such a droid (different only in color and voice), so such droids had been around a while.

      Lucas may be lame, but he's not quite that lame.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    6. Re:Totally inconsistent. by catfishmonkey · · Score: 1

      And you know, if he wants to maintain some consistency with the first two, he wouldn't use an actor at all for Chewbacca, just some fidgety CGI model.

      Yeah, and he could then give Chewbacca wings and lasers that shoot from his eye sockets. I mean fuck it, if R2-D2 can fly all of a sudden he might as well go all out with Chewy.

      --
      The horse is dead. Either fuck it or walk away, but please stop beating it.
    7. Re:Totally inconsistent. by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 1

      Except Lucas fleshed out his character like Kate Moss trapped in a 1-dimensional universe. Have you ever seen Kate Moss interviewed? She's actually half-way smart. And hot. Oh, so very hot.

    8. Re:Totally inconsistent. by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Lucas may be lame, but he's not quite that lame.

      Jarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjarjar

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  64. I bet it's not Chewbacca.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but Chewbacca's father.

    It will look like Chewbacca, act like Chewbacca, but instead of wearing that bandolier or whatever across his chest, it will be white, and go the opposite direction.

    Then, Lucas will show young Chewbacca running around and have his dad killed in front of him, but Chewie is saved by Han Solo's dad. Chewie and Han Solo will grow up together, which is why they become friends.

    I would put this past Lucas the fuckwad after all of the whoring and bullshit storylines he has put the Star Wars characters through.

  65. Age by evocate · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the lifespan of wookies are supposed to be, but I know Peter Mayhew is almost 30 years older now and we will be playing a character who is 20 years younger. Chewbacca is an action character - his lines are pretty limited, even by Lucas standards. He's a 7ft monkeyboy (hmm, that gives me a casting idea) so I expect him to jump around (no not like Yoda) and be even more physical than he was in Episode 4. Is Mayhew going to be able to pull that off? Maybe he'll be in the fur suit just for closeups so he can do the articulation we're all know while a body double will do the broad action shots (as we saw with Christopher Lee in Episode 2).

    1. Re:Age by rusty0101 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Recall that in Ep 4, Chewbacca is identified as being over 200 years old. 20 years earlier means over 180 years old. I think Meyhew being 30 years older isn't going to make much of a difference. It does not bring him appreciably closer to either age for Chewbacca

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    2. Re:Age by malex23 · · Score: 1

      Meyhew's age doesn't matter... all the action sequences will have a CG Wookie leaping about ripping people's heads off.

    3. Re:Age by evocate · · Score: 1

      Best of luck to the ILM team that has to make the CG fur look right.

    4. Re:Age by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      There probably won't be action sequences. Chewie will probably be depicted as a slave, and most likely manicled.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  66. ASSHOLE!!! by UberQwerty · · Score: 1

    Shock news: Luke is Darth Vader's son!

    You have ruined it for me forever!

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  67. Jenga?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought Boba was the son of Jango, not Jenga.

  68. Bet you ten bucks... by cjpez · · Score: 1

    ... that Chewbacca will show up in practically every preview for Ep3.

  69. that's your opinion of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    but to be blunt, mine is that your idea is a simplistic and childish way of introducing a character. Basically such a notion is much like a children's story of naming every creature Mr. or Mrs. [Creature] (e.g. Mrs. Bunny and Mr. Lion)

    One of the things about Epic stories is in how besides the cast-away hero model (Luke in Star Wars) and connection to the inside politics and power struggles you can have perfectly normal Joe Somebody make a drastic difference in the world (galaxy). By twisting and tying of these characters into one little package of former acquantances you weaken the power of the tale. Would you be for a LOTR prequel that showed a younger Gimli playing with a baby Aragorn? How about Legolas adventuring with Bilbo's great grandfather long ago? No, because that would weaken the story and the plot.

    BTW, another childish coincidence could be for Star Trek : Enterprise to have a Lunar vacation result in the meeting of an Iowa farm couple, a Russian couple and a Vulcan child that seems to have an affinity for human girls. See where this is going? It is cheesy and demeaning of the story and of those who read/watch it.

    1. Re:that's your opinion of course by malex23 · · Score: 1
      BTW, another childish coincidence could be for Star Trek : Enterprise to have a Lunar vacation result in the meeting of an Iowa farm couple, a Russian couple and a Vulcan child that seems to have an affinity for human girls. See where this is going?

      Yes. "Jim Henson's Star Wars Babies."

    2. Re:that's your opinion of course by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No it wouldn't. It'd be more like me going into engineering (like my father), at he same school he did (Duke), and meeting the son of oen of my dad's college friends who, like his dad, also went into engineering at the same school. The degree doesn't even ahve to be the same. This kind of thing happens all the time. With something as remote as galactic rebellion, its conceiveable that someone would be heavily influenced by their father's decisions while growign up, etc. And osme of it is genetic. Luke becoming a Jedi, like his father. Luke being on a remote desert planet, like his father. etc.

      Your arguement is very simple.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  70. I dunno, I'm excited now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not even going to bother with Episode III. Lucas has so discraced the legacy of Star Wars I can't even watch the origonal trilogy anymore. One less person to stand in line! At this rate, I won't have to wait in line for 9 hours to get tickets! Yay!

  71. ARTOO? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    do you think he means R2?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:ARTOO? by e144539 · · Score: 1

      I think its obvious he meant artoo-deetoo ;-)

    2. Re:ARTOO? by fforw · · Score: 1
      do you think he means R2?
      thanks =) artoo quite confused me. (maybe cause I always think of it as air-tswo day-tswo)
      --
      while (!asleep()) sheep++
    3. Re:ARTOO? by uberdave · · Score: 1

      This is how it is spelled in the books.

    4. Re:ARTOO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sad, sad man

  72. how cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    perhaps we should also have Grand Moff Tarkin be the landlord for Han Solo's parents! Plus you forgot to tie in Wedge Antilles and Admiral Squid (haha, after all that is what they are).

    Please do not every write stories as it is clear you would be better suited writing story books for 4 - 7 year old kids featuring Mr. Bunny and his hare-raising adventures with Mrs. Ferret in Happyland.

    Some of us would like to have a bit more adult substance in our stories and not be demeaned through such simplistic tie ins

    1. Re:how cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about if the Emperor, realising he's going to lose, sends an entire death star, with any remaining cast members, back in time to kill Luke at the moment of his birth? Uh... sorry about the lack of spoiler warnings :(

    2. Re:how cute by dwillden · · Score: 1
      Plus you forgot to tie in Wedge Antilles and Admiral Squid (haha, after all that is what they are).
      Well I don't know about the Admiral, but Wedge has already been tied in via his father, the Senator Antilles, This person was not seen but was referred to, as an ally of Senator Amidala.
      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  73. No, No! by dupper · · Score: 1

    That's not true! That's impossible!

  74. Uh... no. by mark-t · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I happen to like what I've seen of Lucas's new SW trilogy from what I've seen so far (I know that puts me in a minority in this company, but I'm okay with that, we are each entitled to our own opinions).

    However, I think that the movies of the post original star-wars era that are most liable to still have people talking about them in 20 years time are the LOTR movies by Peter Jackson.

    But I draw the line at Star Trek vs. Middle Earth debates ("Hah! Gandalf's an Istari! He took down a Balrog, he could take down a Borg Cube if he wanted to!") No.... I really don't wanna go there.

  75. dammit by smoondog · · Score: 1

    I was waiting to see the prequels before seeing the orginal series... Who's chewbacca anyway?

    -Sean

    1. Re:dammit by davebo · · Score: 1

      This was a truly brilliant response.

      I commend you, sir.

  76. When I browse from a net cafe, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my preferences aren't available -immediately- when I access the page. Spoilers in headlines is fucking moronic, so fuck off and die.

    1. Re:When I browse from a net cafe, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a life. it's just a movie.

    2. Re:When I browse from a net cafe, by Plato@nym.alias.net · · Score: 2
      What's really interesting is how fanboys have expanded the definition of spoiler. A Spoiler used to be something that completely ruins (hence the word "spoil") your enjoyment of a movie. Like, for example, revealing "whodunit" in a traditional murder mystery. Now it means (or so it seems to this non-fanboy) revealing anything you didn't know already.

      I admit to being somewhat baffled by it all. If I were an editor I would have posted this story without even thinking that someone might consider it a spoiler.

  77. How about.... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

    ... the second Borg Cube it attacked?

    The first one having been vaporized....

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  78. I bet you are 5 years old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in your mind... Your logic is flawed if you think that the coincidental meetings of people again and again is somehow likely to fit in with the
    1. lack of mention of previous meetings in 4, 5, and 6
    2. that this story was not just about 5 characters but was about a people's struggle that centered literally around these 5 characters
    3. If this is before some of those characters met, got involved in saving the universe or WERE EVEN BORN then find other new unrelated characters.
    Simplistic and childish, that is what the prequel movies are. Perhaps you could explain how the "previous stories connecting characters" was alluded to. I think to do so you would have to resort to dial-a-psychic tactics of purposely using generalizing, leading and vague non-commital moments in the original trilogy.

    That said, if you just seemed to say focus upon the early lives of the other characters like Han and Chewy with absolutely no crossing of paths literal or otherwise then I think it would be a great idea for the movie. I think it would have been a good idea to find out how R2D2 and C3PO first met but NOT INVOLVING ANYONE ELSE. In fact if you must involve others, then you should just have them operate on Corellia with someone named Antilles stationed nearby. However, to cross their paths is both demeaning to the viewer and the story as it contradicts itself.

    However, remember the definition of "Fanboy" is really just that of any zealot who refuses to look clearly at the universe. If people choose to be fanboys and make excuses and find very weak "examples" of the original movies that will justify and excuse such literary bungling then go ahead.

  79. oh, thats lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    perhaps you don't understand limits? Limited coincidence is ok... however some will say "yeah but what about Leia and Luke just happening to meet?" That of course is not coincidence since she was planning on delivering the Death Star data as well as enlisting the aid of Obi Wan whom she obviously knew was on the planet down below. Since he was observing and remotely caring for Luke then this seems more planned than coincidence.

    That makes good sense and is good story material but C3PO and R2D2 meeting up with them all much less C3PO being crafted by Anakin is just stupid and insulting

    1. Re:oh, thats lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, we know 3P0 had to have his memory wiped between Ep II and Ep IV. Presumably we'll see that in Ep III. Perhaps R2 didn't have his memory wiped, which is why he wanted to go off in that specific direction in the opening scenes of Ep IV... he knew who Ben was, and where to find him. He even refered to him as his former master, right?

      Of course, Ben didn't immediately recognize either of them, so you have to wonder about HIS memory, or assume he's been around so many droids that he just doesn't pay attention...

  80. It's a Storytelling Tradition by serutan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't blame Lucas, he's just following in the grand tradition of many storytellers. For example, Shakespeare wrote a number of plays in which characters separated earlier in life are reunited by coincidence.

  81. good kids movie, but not Star Wars prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and that is what the problem is to many. Saying anything along the lines of "you just wanted it to go your way" is not accurate. It would be accurate to say that if everyone was bitching about particulars, but the problem is the insulting story telling environment of the prequels. A prequel would introduce the events that led up to the current situation to the entire galaxy. A good prequel would utilize the subtle and thus realistic elements of a large social and political upheaval and how it came into being and effected the people. A bad prequel would just rehash the same characters in the same locations with the same alien dialog in a childish attempt to just simply "throw a movie out there."

    Episodes 1 and 2 seemed to just dump the entire galactic issues into a couple of cute little packages and thus refuse to answer those questions that many had. Thankfully we have some talented novel writers who had already done a good job in setting up the environment for the actual events taking place in the current movie. There are deep and involving stories ranging back hundreds to thousands of years that are complex and rewarding. So if you want good story, good dialoge and ADULT stories then go out and check out the wide array of existing Star Wars novels. BTW, "adult" has nothing to do with sex but with complex interaction of abstract ideas that are not portrayed in childrens movies... like Episode I.

  82. More than that! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear the Ferenghi, Q, and the Borg are going to make an appearance, too, completely spoiling the previous continuity.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  83. Re: Han Solo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wheres that cliche from?

  84. Some of it does make sense.... by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 1

    1) Why doesn't Tatooine make sense? It is important because Anakin was born there and all of his remaining family lives there. They take Luke there because that is where his family is. This is actually one of the plot points Lucas seemed to do well with.

    2) C-3PO being built by Anakin is a bit hokey, but the droids are in all the films because they are essentially owned by the Skywalkers. Its no coincidence that Leia trusted R2 with the Death Star plans considering how many times the little guy saved her mom's life.

    I'm alot more skeptical about Chewy however. A young Lando may make more sense considering the battle he mentioned in ROTJ which allowed the Rebels to trust him enough to become a General.

    Brian Ellenberger

    1. Re:Some of it does make sense.... by SpryGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But presumably they wanted to *hide* Darth Vader's offspring from him... so why would they "hide" Luke right where Darth would expect to find him? On his home planet, with his relatives (by marriage)?

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  85. No, Anakin has to kill Jar-Jar by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember, Lucas is trying to show the conversion of a very promising young Jedi Knight into the right hand man for the forces of evil. What could be the triggering factor that would make a character such as Anakin no longer value sentient life? If taking revenge for his mother's death wasn't enough to push him over the edge for good, what will be?

    It can only be Jar-Jar. That's the death that would really make the audience think. "Wait, is killing Jar-Jar really evil? Perhaps the dark side of the force is more seductive than we imagined!" "Sure, Anakin/Vader is now going to cause the loss of billions of innocent lives and help his vicious master oppress the galaxy for decades... but isn't that a price I would have been just as willing to pay to see Jar-Jar strangled with his own tongue?"

  86. I like Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and personally think that "oversimplification" of any language is not possible. Language should be viewed as a efficient mechanism to convey ideas in an abstract manner (obviously). Because English is a whore language of thrown together crap by so many others it has become rather unwieldy for communication. However, since the majority of people are more concerned with "Looking" and "sounding" good with pretty words and sound bites then I guess the devolution of English makes sense. To those that say "oversimplify" I guess I would have to ask if you say, "I formally request an audience to listen to the distinguished speaker on the other end, whomever that may be and bestow upon them the glory and dignity so deserving of one who has taken the time to visit their thoughts and words upon mine ears. Please good sir or madam, for indeed I do not know thine sex or marital status of course, please bestow upon us (as in royal talk) the honor of your conversation?" when you pick up the phone?

    Mangling of a language works both ways and I see no point in illogical use of the letter Q if you must also use a U after it. What is C for anyway? Yes, I think that even though he was being sarcastic there was indeed point in useless discourse by the grand master of satire "Samuel Clemens"

  87. No, no... A Wizard Did It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory Simpsons reference.

  88. Holiday Special by asn · · Score: 2, Funny

    In efforts to save money, I heard that Lucas is going to resurrect some of the wookie footage from the Holiday Special and cut it into Episode III...

  89. Who cares about Chewbacca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally, I'm waiting for the return of Princess Leia. *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap* *fap*

    1. Re:Who cares about Chewbacca? by stud9920 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except Lucas will probably hire Britney Spears to replay the role for A New Hope Ultra Special Edittion, because his teenage daughter asked him to.

    2. Re:Who cares about Chewbacca? by stud9920 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, in the "Greedo shot first" tradition, Chewie will no longer speak with monosylabic screams, but in upper class English.

  90. Just curious... by shoptroll · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Woa! Just for the records: Artoo and C-3PO will be there too!" Didn't someone say that the whole series is told by the droids anyways? I mean, that would explain how C-3PO is able to tell the ewoks the story at the end of Return of The Jedi..

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  91. Re:how stupid - not that stupid by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    1. Tatooine -- Yes, it was the home world of Darth, and hence Darth's brother Owen, and hence Luke could have been dropped off to be cared for by Owen by Obi-wan, who stuck around to watch over him, and whom Leia was going to see at the start of the original movie (remember that one?)

    The only disgusting thing is that Vader killed his own brother in that same movie simply because Owen didn't know where the droids were. Of course, I doubt that plot point had been in the mind of George while conceiving of the original story line.

    The only truly odd coincidence is that Lips ended up going there in the first place, to a planet that happened to have a child whose genetic propensity for the Force was exceedingly rare -- rare on a galactic scale! That such a child happened to be on any planet any one person (even a well-travelled queen) would visit during their lifetime is unlikely. That he was on that planet AND their paths happened to cross is unbelievable.

    2. I find it hard to believe Darth invented the Goldenrod brand of protocol droid. More likely he assembled his own Goldenrod from parts of busted other Goldenrods. Don't know what the "official" cannon says of this, but the latter makes the creation much more likely. That he might be some super-AI-programmer at age 7 is not likely.

    Of course, he is a super-engineer and natural pilot, all independent of the force and before even learning about The Force.

    He's kind of the Paul Atreides of the Star Wars universe. The Kwizatz Haderach, being the first true male Bene Gesserit AND mentat AND well-trained prince AND desert fighter leader AND spice-taker all rolled into one.

    Paul Atreides
    The Kwizats Haderach
    Usul (the small moon named for a mouse or something), also a power word for a weirding module
    Can never remember the 4th name
    Shoot me now

    3PO was on that ship because Leia was on that ship. Yes, they were owned by the captain, but he was obviously intimately embedded with the rebels. The droids were obviously more rebel-owned than captain-owned, as evidenced by them obeying Leia's commands to go take the message to Obi-wan. For all we know, they were hanging with Leia all this time as she grew up on Alderaan and were transferred by "ownership" to the captain since Leia was hidden cargo, thus when interrogated they'd say they were owned by the captain and not Leia: queen of spades in the Galactic Empire's most wanted deck.

    3. Who met for the first time in the original? Leia, Obi-wan, and Darth all mutually knew or knew of each other, to greater or lesser extent. (Leia a well-known leader of the rebels.) Everyone met Luke for the first time, although in the first movie it was obvious there was some bad blood between Owen and Obi-wan. If Chewbacca never meets Darth in #3, then we won't really have a problem at all (not that there were any scenes in the original 3 that hinted they did or did not know each other.)

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  92. Oh yeah? by Peterus7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I really wish Lucas would give people what they want...

    Jar Jar's head. On a silver platter. With Ewok sauce on the side.

    No, really, I think George Lucas really needs to learn that he's been getting a pretty bad rap for Episode 1 and Episode 2. His storytelling skills have rusted, and he needs to realize that the magic is gone.

    It was fresh when it came out, but now we're used to big aliens, flashy special effects, and bad acting. He needs to provide the people with something that actually lives to the level of innovating the originals had, instead of being all high and mighty and telling us it's an epic.

    The thing is people know an epic when they see one. You don't need to tell them that it's an epic, because then there's a chance you could get screwed. Instead, imoho, he should revamp his methods, find what works/what the people want, and do it.

    Another sad thing that I think the new ones have really lost was the feeling of the originals. The originals felt like they were made on a small budget and stuff, and the new ones just try to impress you with graphics and Jar Jar.

    *[/rant mode]*

    1. Re:Oh yeah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the new ones just try to impress you with graphics and Jar Jar."

      Jar Jar - That's like trying to impress your inlaws with a whoopie cushion under the seat.

    2. Re:Oh yeah? by Peterus7 · · Score: 1
      Yeah... The droids were funny in the original, and they maybe have their moments in the new ones, but Jar Jar...

      I'm sorry, but I find myself disgusted by a mix of salamander, idiot, and jamacian in one.

  93. you my friend are a student of poetic justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I salute you

  94. your eyes were open during the prayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course this situation can only logically mean I too had my eyes open. there is a word for that and you fit it nicely. It is amusing when someone comes along and flames someone for having an opinion when they themselves seem to think they are the Omniponent One. Great work!

  95. HAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn I must be a sick bastard, but reading your statement and question has me laughing so hard it hurts. I can just hear the ripping sounds now as Chewy tears into that annoying ganja-smoking idiot.

  96. The only reason I'm looking forward to ep III by imadork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that we'll get another great soundtrack from John Williams. I can ignore the dialogue and still enjoy the movie, and I'll probably get just as much of the "plot", too!

  97. Possible Spoiler by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
    Chancellor Palpatine is *gasp* the same guy as Emperor Palpatine

    While seemingly obvious, I think this is where the twist will come in. Lucas has alluded that there will be a huge surprise in the 3rd installment. Perhaps the Chancellor is actually a clone? I think it's a stretch that this guy is around as the head politico, dealing with the Jedis, and none of them notices that he's eminating the most powerful dark force of all. Then again, Lucas writes some pretty big plotholes...

    1. Re:Possible Spoiler by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, if you look at the first trilogy, almost noone who who he or she first appeared to be.

      Crazy old coot turns out to be famous powerful Jedi.
      Darth Vader is Luke's father.
      Leia is Luke's sister.
      Lando is working for Darth Vader
      Han Solo is a wussie (i.e., Greedo shot first)

      I've given up on Episode 3 having some kind of really mind-blowing wrap up to the story since the plots of 1 and 2 sucked so bad, but I'm sure there will be some kind of big twist in the end.

      My vote is for Yoda being the true Dark Lord, Obi-Wan becomes Darth Vader and Anakin goes off into obscurity (perhaps taking Obi-Wan's identity)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Possible Spoiler by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Han Solo is a wussie (i.e., Greedo shot first)

      That was added, dude. In the original, Greedo shot while he was falling. That bastard made Greedo shoot first when he made the "special edition". In fact, except for the fact that Cloud City is a beautiful place, the whole special edition franchise should just go to hell. I saw the Jabba scene in Ep. 4 years before the special edition came out, and Lucas said straight up "We left it out because it made the movie unnecessarily longer, and didn't contribute significantly to the plot". Then they go and computer-edit in Jabba the Slug and stick the stupid scene back in? Lucas comes out and says "Oh yeah, yeah, we always meant to do that when the technology was available, we shot that with a human stand-in, intending to go back over it with computer animation when the stuff became realistic."

      Idiot. Lucas is an idiot. If he can find a way to bring Han Solo back into the movie, then he might stand a small chance of making a movie that's better than ATOC.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:Possible Spoiler by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I know that was added in. That was the joke.

      That's OK, maybe Lucas will take out the extra Jabba scene when he releases the Super Special Edition that includes the additional music number where Mark Hammill and Alec Guiness perform a duet with the cantina band.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Possible Spoiler by sh00z · · Score: 1
      Chancellor Palpatine is *gasp* the same guy as Emperor Palpatine
      While seemingly obvious, I think this is where the twist will come in. Lucas has alluded that there will be a huge surprise in the 3rd installment. Perhaps the Chancellor is actually a clone?
      I seriously doubt this can be changed. The Palpatine storyline is CANON, established in the opening paragraph of the very first book (aside: am I the only person who still whants to know what 'The Journal of the Whills' is?). Go back and look at it. The plot is writ in stone. The only seriously open question to original trilogy fans is the triggering event in the Darth Vader conversion.
    5. Re:Possible Spoiler by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Actually, thats my theory too. I was trying not to be a complete asshole and post it to /., but seeing as you've opened the floodgates and Lucas is about as clever as the chair I'm sitting on, I'll expand on the idea.

      There is plenty of evidence to support our theory. The key is that the Chancellor doesn't radiate anything. Yoda views him with great suspicion in Episode 2 as he essentially pressures Amidala into leaving under the protection of Mannequin Skywalker. Yoda knows something is up. They managed to get some CGI eyebrow raising action out of the li'l deathfrog.

      You'll also notice that Palpatine is looking kinda... drained. You might read that this is the darkside wearing at him, but the Jedi should be able to pick it up like you've said despite the "blindness" problem they are experiencing.

      I think it is very likely that the Chancellor is a clone of Darth Sidious/ Emperor Palpatine, who according to post Return of the Jedi fiction (it was in the comics, at any rate) had a number of clones during the Clone Wars.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    6. Re:Possible Spoiler by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      I don't think more than 5 people read the book... and I don't think Lucas cares.

      Having not read the book myself, I would suggest that that first paragraph perhaps was written from the perspective of someone who didn't know the truth (i.e., the clone theory). Like I said, I haven't read it so I acknowledge that I'm completely guessing here.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  98. Re: Ahhhh... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... now, this is the kind of debate that makes Slashdot Slashdot... ;-)

  99. "What do you get a Wookie for Christmas..." by n9fzx · · Score: 1
    "...when he already owns a comb?"

    Anybody else remember the little ditty courtesy of Mad Magazine and that evil genious William Gaines????

    --
    ...-.-
  100. Thank the Simpsons by bedurndurn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course he's beloved; if it weren't for Chewbacca, we never would've heard Ralph say, "I bent my wookie."

  101. I can't believe I just read someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...compare Lucas's Star Wars to Shakespeare. Shakespeare?!?!?! Not that film can't interpret Shakespeare well, try comparing Kurosawa's RAN to King Lear and you see a masterpiece derivative. Ironically, Star Wars was originally based in part on the Seven Samurai, another Kurosawa great. Lucas never came close in subtlety or grace to Kurosawa's work, never mind Shakespeare. His best film, by far, is American Graffiti - which isn't saying much. These latest Star Wars films may greatly damage the funding of future SF as a film genera, we can only hope that the Matrix trilogy will earn enough profit to counterbalance the mess Lucas has created. --M

    1. Re:I can't believe I just read someone... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Star Wars was originally based in part on the Seven Samurai, another Kurosawa great. Lucas never came close in subtlety or grace to Kurosawa's work, never mind Shakespeare.

      Hidden Fortress, not Seven Samurai. Plot of Hidden Fortress: a disguised senior General must help a hidden princess survive a crossing through enemy territory from a hidden fortress in their recently defeated kingdom to safety in an allied kingdom with the aid of two fools. The two fools were by Lucas's admission among the inspirations for R2D2 and C3PO. Princess and General seem obvious seeds for Obi-Wan and Leia.

      If you've seen Seven Samurai, you'd have a hard time figuring out what about the movie could have inspired Star Wars. Mind you, I think you could have rewritten the big fight scene in AOTC to be a replay of the big fight scene in 7 Samurai (when the bad guys attack the village), but I don't see anything more than minor details suggesting 7 Samurai in Star Wars.

      There are elements in the stories that are taken from other Kurosawa films (the bit with Han and Chewy chasing, and then being chased by, the Stormtroopers reminds me of scenes in a couple of Kurosawa films). But the biggest influence from Kurosawa's oeuvre was clearly Hidden Fortress. Anyone who liked Star Was for reasons other than the spaceships ought to watch it.

  102. Star wars Math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Add Chewbacca
    2.???
    3 Profit

  103. slash on slashdot by Cally · · Score: 1

    A spoiler would be something like, oh say, that Chewbacca is bald in this episode or that he's gay or something. That would be a spoiler...

    Chewie's /gay/ ?! Wow! I have a friend who'll be very interested to hear that - she's had this thing about a "Han/Chewie sandwich" for years - but then she went to a terribly posh English girl's boarding school which explains a lot...

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:slash on slashdot by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      From Chewie's "ad": twink in search of a bear.

      Now that's scary!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  104. Single Sentence Synopsis by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

    If you don't agree with Kelz, don't post.

  105. New Explanation by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Funny
    Han Solo can't actually understand Wookie. Chewbacca understands english just fine, so he knows what Han is saying to him, but Han is just pretending that he knows what Chewbacca is saying back. So the whole time Chewie is saying things like "Skywalker? I think i met his dad twenty years ago!" and Han just tells him to go fix a stabalizer or something.

    C3PO either can't understand R2-D2, or for some reason chooses not to communicate what he says, so R2-D2 is running around saying things like "Watch out Luke! Vader is your father!" and "Hey Yoda! How's it hangin?" and Threepio doesn't bother to translate them.

    Maybe Threepio is still secretly loyal to Vader and doesn't want to tip Luke off?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  106. It will be the same light saber, set on red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should they spend on two sabers?

    1. Re:It will be the same light saber, set on red by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because his old one got cut in half in Episode II?

  107. Star Wars Blows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first movie broke ground. The second movie was a good sequel. The third movie sucked so much that I feel like tossing my cookies just thinking about it. The forth movie was a waste of time. The fifth was another colossal waste of time. Who cares about this lame franchise? Give it up baby-boomers, there's nothing left to milk.

  108. Hey, I like ewoks! by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    Do not meddle in the affairs of ewoks, because thou tasteth of pork when roasted and thine skull will tune up nicely as a party drum!

    Weeee hah! Awoo! Yubba yubba yubba!

  109. Prequels Vs LotR by nagora · · Score: 0, Troll
    It's interesting that loads of people are having a go at Lucas for producing the first three films of his six part "Life and Death of Darth Vader" as a more-or-less continuous story split into three parts. Sure, they don't hold up as individual films but then neither do Jackson's LotRs films. Neither director has to work to the standard template, in Lucas' case because of the reputation his first three films in the series had, and in Jackson's because of the reputation the source material had.

    In the end, though, Lucas has made a mess of his own idea by indulging himself too much, while Jackson has made a mess of someone else's idea. At least Lucas tried, but I think he left it too long between the two sets of films and the ideas went stale in his head.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  110. Jar Jar was a chess player by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we all know where the anecdote about Wookies' poor sportsmanship originated (ripping arms out of sockets when they lose). In Ep III, Jar Jar will challenge Chewie to a chess match and, stupidly, will embarrass the Wookie. We all know how this ends (and have been looking forward to it since Ep. I).

  111. Well, here's something kinda close... by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Fur suit sex.


    And you thought you fetish was fucked up.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  112. chewbacca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great more drinking games for the small of mind
    e.g. a shot everytime chewie says something dumb

  113. The Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Force is drawing everything together!

  114. OMFG by fleppir · · Score: 1

    Man does Spielberg SUCK as a script writer.

    What's next? Han Solo digital actor?

    --
    I am the Barber of Seville.
  115. Re:how stupid - not that stupid by Nindalf · · Score: 1
    "Usul" was his private tribal name, meaning "the strength at the base of the pillar."

    "Muad'dib" was his public fremen name, meaning a sort of kangaroo mouse on Dune known as "the teacher of children" for its human-like desert survival strategies. It was also the name of a moon. (in the movie, it was "the mouse-shadow of the second moon")

    "The Kwizats Haderach" wasn't so much a name as a title or description. Arguably, he didn't turn out to be it after all (he claimed he was "something unexpected"), or a true mentat.

    Excised before publication was Paul's remarkable talent at knitting, which the editors thought was one skill too many for suspension of disbelief. The story suffered though, as this was the original, much more logical, reason for he and his mother to be accepted into Stilgar's tribe.


    It is by will alone I set my thoughts in motion. Through the drug caffeine the thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains, the stains become a warning.


    Shoot me now

    Me first
  116. One good thing. by Doctor+Funk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In A new Hope, Obi-Wan sets up the Han meeting through Chewbacca. Their having a previous relationship lends merit to that little detail. And, slightly off-topic, but if Lucas keeps bringing back characters, why can't we see the Millenium Falcon in its heyday!? The Falcon is the coolest character in all the movies.

    1. Re:One good thing. by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Three "millenium Falcon"-class ships were visible in a scene in AOTC.

      And interesting note about the Obi-Wan/Chewbacca link. I had forgotten about that.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  117. Re:Age-Big "furry" deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Best of luck to the ILM team that has to make the CG fur look right."

    Monsters Inc. and Ice Age shown it can be done.

  118. here ya go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a spoiler for you: the movie will follow in the first two episodes footsteps by continuing to ruin the franchise.

    I might as well read the spoilers, they'll be more entertaining than watching the movie.

  119. Chew-BACCA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ohhhhh, what a WOOKIE!!!

  120. Wookies in the Imperial Senate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha!! You lose and You MUST Trade Cards!

  121. Obligatory Triumph Quote by Mad+Man · · Score: 1
    was Re: My God, the spoilers!
    WHY can't the editors realize that there are people who don't want these spoilers, even seemingly minor ones like this?
    It's extremely inconsiderate. Presumably they don't want people to stop reading their site, right?
    "You want a spoiler? Here's a spoiler. You will die alone."

    -Triumph, the Insult Comic Dog
    "Star Wars Nerds"
  122. Face it by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The only way to avoid that bit of knowledge would be for you to live in a hole in remote part of a forrest for the next couple of years...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  123. I dunno.... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 1
    Wookies were apparently not adept at pants technology. As a child, my friends and I had some discussions about this that were alarmingly like the goofy/pluto debate in 'Stand By Me', when I saw that film years later.


    "He can drive the Falcon, drink in a bar, and crack jokes....but he doesn't wear pants!"

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  124. Another spoiler: Alec Guiness! by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    I also hear Sir Alec Guiness won't be Obi-Wan Kenobi! Imagine that.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  125. Is the original actor back, or the suit? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Unlike many of the characters in the movie, where they have to do something about the age differences,
    because they're doing a prequel when the original actors are 25 years older or else dead, Chewbacca was basically a guy in a Wookiee suit with a good script. Sure, the actor did a fine job, but just about anybody of similar size could handle it well enough. So as long as he hasn't gotten too fat or arthritic, then it's nice to give him a job that will probably pay more than most of the actors in the original got.

    But it's the suit and the script that really have the part, and if the script is bad enough, the suit's no more helpful than Jackie Chan's Tuxedo...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Is the original actor back, or the suit? by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      The original performer, Peter Mayhew, is back as the character, and probably won't be wearing the "same suit" (I'm sure there were actually multiple copies of the costume in the original trilogy, in fact, as is common practice).

      Actually, while most people would indeed think that it wouldn't really make that much difference who was in the suit as long as he was the same size (though with someone like Peter Mayhew, that's enough of an obstacle to his being replaced right there - the man's pretty tall, after all), it turns out not to be. It's well-known among fans that one day during shooting of The Empire Strikes Back Mayhew became sick, and they attempted to use his double/stand-in for a few scenes, but had to abandon the attempt; he "just wasn't Chewie," even though the performer wasn't even required to speak (Chewie's vocals are all added later, of course). His movements and body language alone were different enough that director Irvin Kershner and the crew realized they had to do the scenes with Mayhew for consistency.

  126. If you have thick shaggy fur all over by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...then there really isn't much need for pants.

    Unless you get a boner, I suppose. Then it might be embarrasing.

  127. Chewbacca is over 200 years old. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was grown before Han was even born, you knucklehead.

    1. Re:Chewbacca is over 200 years old. by oaf357 · · Score: 1

      This is what is so tricky about the Star Wars timeline. Luke Skywalker is a man in Episode IV and his father is ruling the galaxy. Meanwhile this ancient throw rug is smuggling "rebels" from planet to planet.

    2. Re:Chewbacca is over 200 years old. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your point is, but Luke Skywalker was really just a boy. Like 17 or 18 years old, as I see it.

  128. Spell a wookie word... by slowtonejoe75 · · Score: 1

    Bwluuaaauhhhggg!

    That was the best I could do... don't laugh.

  129. What came first..... by SuperSnooper · · Score: 1

    If the prequel comes after the sequel....does, in this case, pre-production happen after post-production?

  130. Original Star Wars sucks, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone go back and watch again the original Star Wars? I have. It stinks. It isn't any better than the lame two recent movies. It's not that Lucas has gotten worse, it's that you, the audience, has gotten more sophisticated and Lucas hasn't.

    1. Re:Original Star Wars sucks, too by m1chael · · Score: 0

      thats because you are older now. nobody realises that the star wars saga was made for children. thats why everyone got upset when they saw jarjar! because middle aged men thought he was too immature.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  131. Re:how stupid - not that stupid by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    You never actually read Dune, did you? Let's stick with the first two books, Dune and Dune, Messiah; better to ignore Children of Dune and after for now; I get the feeling that while according to Herbert, a few scenes in Children of Dune were written before Dune was published, much more of it was probably written after Dune, Messiah, and he started losing control of continuity after Dune, Messiah (originally Alia did not have ancestral memories, but only the memories of the Fremen Reverend Mothers; that changed in Children of Dune).

    1. There was no weirding module in the novel. "The Weirding Way" was merely Stilgar's descriptive term for the kind of martial arts that Bene Gesserit taught (because Bene Gesserit are "weirding women," or "witches"). The whole "name is a killing word" thing in the book means only that the name "Muad'Dib" is chanted by the Fedaykin when they leap into battle, nothing more. The "word" Paul would kill Gaius Helen Mohiam with is merely his ability to shock her into silence, supposedly shock her enough to cause her a heart attack, the only thing he yells at Feyd-Rautha is "I will not say it," which shocks Feyd-Rautha (because Paul has been all but silent for most of the fight, and becuase he thinks Paul is about to die) into a momentary slip that is enough for Paul to kill him. And the Baron does not fly away into the storm, he is simply pricked with the Gom Jabbar and runs away in agony. You don't know for sure that the Guildsmen use melange until a contact lens falls from a navigator's eyes (navigators and steersmen are originally different, I think, one normal, one mildly non-human looking; not like the Guildsmen of the film or the late books). Ignore Lynch's oddities, even though it's clear from Heretics of Dune and Chapterhouse: Dune that Herbert himself was taken with some of Lynch's ideas, they aren't relevant to the first book.

    2. Paul Atreides accepts the Fremen public name, Muad'dib, meaning "Mouse," upon his acceptance as a Fremen; his tribe has a secret tribal name for him, "Usul," "the base of the pillar." "Usul" means that Stilgar expects the martial arts talents he and his mother bring with them to provide a new foundation of strength to the tribe; "Muad'dib" he picks because he's amused by one of the kangaroo mice he hears hopping in the night, not realizing that the kangaroo mouse is held in high esteem in Fremen culture as "the instructor of boys" (which, as a teacher of the martial arts, Paul will of course become).

    Paul is a mentat only because he comes from a line bred for intelligence by both the Bene Gesserit and the Atreides themselves, and both of his parents think a mentat Duke would be unstoppable. The fact that he's a mentat isn't coincidental to Paul's status as the Kwisatz Haderach, it's an obvious side effect.

    3. The Kwisatz Haderach, "the one who can be many places at once," is the male who can survive the Agony that makes a woman a Bene Gesserit Reverend Mother. You get the idea that only a very few Bene Gesserit women in a generation attempt the Agony, and only a certain percentage survive it. And no woman in generations had been stupid enough to try it while pregnant; it was rare enough that Jessica, a trained Bene Gesserit, didn't know the effects.

    The Bene Gesserit had been manipulating breeding for 90 generations, primarily the Corrino, Atreides, and Harkonnnen lines (all of them related; the Atreides are cousins of the Corrinos on the distaff side, and Count Fenring is a relative of the Corrinos and probably of the Atreides), looking for the talent which will make the Kwisatz Haderach possible. The key is the ability to look into the future, for Reverend Mothers are only able (through Other Memory) to look into the past. While Guild Navigators are able to look into the future, they see it only dimly, where the Kwisatz Haderach sees it very sharply, sharply enough to fit history around his vision.

    4. The Missionari Protectiva, an arm of the Bene Gesserit charged with traveling to dangerous planets

  132. Episode III by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Little Chewbacca's First Life Day

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  133. How about this? by inkswamp · · Score: 1
    I see some complaints about how "in this huge universe, all these characters just happen to keep having their paths cross which is totally unrealistic... yadda yadda...." Six degrees theories notwithstanding, I agree, however...

    What if Lucas plans to make a side story about Chewbacca that never actually interacts with the main story? It's not totally inconceivable that we might have the main story concerning Anakin and Obi-Wan unfolding while we see occasional glimpses of whatever is happening with Chewbacca at the time. Why assume that, just because he'll be in the film, that his story line will directly intersect the stories of the main characters? There is the stuff with the Hutts that needs to be set up (recall that Han Solo was already in deep doo-doo in Episode IV.) Perhaps Chewbacca's appearance in the film will be brief flashes of the beginnings of that story line.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  134. MOD PARENT UP! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    --I have no idea why people would consciously avoid SW info (except maybe to avoid all reference to JAR JAR!!... AAAGH) IMHO the movie probably won't be worth it.

    --Hope I'm wrong people...

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  135. i would rather by m1chael · · Score: 0

    want to see a cg wookie. just to see how cg has progressed otherwise this post may turn into flamebait since i see not much reason other than friends who want to see this movie to see this movie.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  136. stopped caring after watching ep 1 a few times by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    When I realized that not only was it an irredeemibly bad movie, it also diminished the originals by making them NOT MAKE SENSE. (Never mind all the dick-waving special effects)

    Making Darth Vader build C3PO was beyond retarded...but the lack of recognition can be explained by the fact that C3PO is a robot and his memory can be erased, and that Vader no doubt saw a lot of such droids. Still, if you make a prequel, you should NOT need to do any rationalizing.

    But chewbacca is a sentient being for whom things should remain a bit more clear. He had BETTER NOT meet obi-wan...there would be no rationalizing that.

    Not that it matters, I won't watch it anyway. George lucas can suck my balls.

    1. Re:stopped caring after watching ep 1 a few times by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      He had BETTER NOT meet obi-wan...there would be no rationalizing that.

      To quote Doctor Funk in another post:

      "In A new Hope, Obi-Wan sets up the Han meeting through Chewbacca. Their having a previous relationship lends merit to that little detail."

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  137. oh no! teh spoilars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe you gave away that r2 and c-3po are going to be in episode 3!!!
    Because they weren't in the first 2 prequels...

  138. Sigh by chazzf · · Score: 1

    I'm such a fanboy. Why I bother defending Lucas I have no idea. Probably because it's ten in the morning in Berlin on a Sunday and I've nothing better to do. First, we've no idea how large Chewie's role is in Episode III. Personally, I imagine that it's hardly above a cameo, something to make us grin. Second, even if it is a large role, so what? I hear a lot of people grumbling about this being a small galaxy, how the same people keep showing up and all that. Well, frankly, I see it more as our story follows the same group of people, who naturally bump into the people they know from time to time. A previous poster questioned why Lando was a general. Why not? He's charismatic, a good pilot, and has administrative experience (Cloud City). Sure the alliance has a command structure, but they'll also take what they can get. Look at the high command: Ackbar (former civlian city administator on Calamari), Madine (Imperial defector), Rieekan (Alderaanian technician), Solo (smuggler), Drayson (customs officer), Bel Iblis (senator). Lando fits in this group. This is Lucas's story, whether we like it or not. We must judge something by the standards of the existing universe. We cannot apply our own standards to a galaxy far far away. I mean, you all sound like pedantic whiners. If you don't like it don't go. I didn't care for Ep I very much and I thought that Ep II lacked in the writing. But the effects rocked, and I'll gladly trade five bucks for two hours of being stunned by something I'll never see in real life. For that very reason I'll go see Ep III. Lucas will show me something I can't see anywhere else. End rant. Why did I bother again?

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  139. Chewbacca, played by Robin Williams by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

    Chewbaacca: To be played by Robin Williams.
    "The costume looks good on you"
    "What costume?"

    1. Re:Chewbacca, played by Robin Williams by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points :) LOL

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
  140. Lucas to Fans by sharkey · · Score: 1
    Points at theatre showing Episode III: Drek of the Republic

    I don't care what you smell... get in there and pay your $8.50!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  141. they should hire you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while you were obviously (to me at least) joking, I find no difference in your idea with the simplistic tie ins in the first two episodes.

    1. Re:they should hire you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really should!

  142. stupid kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but thats OK, since kids can be stupid and not realize that tits and ass do not make a star unless you lower your expectations a WHOOOOOOLE lot. The problem is judging by fanboy responses here and with many games and other movies, that many chronologically aged folk (I refuse to call them adults) follow the same logic. Yeah, put that honey on the screen... who cares if there is no plot and no story. Look retards, rent a porn but save movies for story telling.

  143. your argument is non existent childish patter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your argument is based solely on probability of people in related fields (or related schooling) meeting up. Using your analogy, we would need to establish that for some reason you never spoke of your father's relationship with Chewy much less that you obviously lied about how you met Chewy. Is it possible that you could meet up with a family friends son at the same college your Dad and his friend went to? Of course. However we are talking here not about the probability that it could happen but the realism of it happening given what we know about the characters and their backgrounds.

    Your arguments are like a childs arguments to get a toy. I find it amusing you say mine were simple while you bark and snarl like a puppy but yet I can't help but feel pity for you. If you do not understand or appreciate adult themed story lines then so be it but do not try to spew your prattle about the probability of known and established character's parents and the like meeting up previously but with no mention. There is not literary reason for such a meeting. Such things only satisfy small children as small children do not view the world with a realistic perspective on how events unfold.

    I can see how perhaps Han Solo had met, scene or heard in person Grand Moff Tarkin at some point when he was an Imperial himself. Chewy and Han's history started together when Han rescued Chewy and other Wookies from slavery. They did not have family ties, they did not once go on picnics with the Skywalker family and they did not go to the Opera with Senator Palpatine.

    Stop trying to color the world with your childish stupidity and grow up.

  144. yes and that works well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as the parents fought in the same cause decades before it is possible that a small rebellion would see the children meet up. However, these parents came from all over the galaxy and the issue with Lucas and simplistic situations is that he seems to make the entire galaxy consist of around 30 people only. Go back 100 years I bet he would have even more pathetic tie ins. Oh yes, Jabba the hutt and Chewbaca were in a nursery together. Geez, we are talking about a GALAXY here.

  145. nobility and elitism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the original draw of Star Wars was the concept of anyone being able to make a difference. The overdone tie ins reduces that to a system of autocratic elitism. Han Solo was just another Imperial officer and a good pilot that acted ethically. Chewy was a darn slave for that matter. Wedge seemed like a good pilot but now has been cast as the son of a Senator and the magic is gone from that as well.

    No, what we have here is literary name dropping.

  146. Sports perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Imagine the story of a down trodden and poor college team that somehow makes it to the Final Four and wins it all. Now imagine the reality of the players, coaches and other notable individuals being portrayed by Lucas. Or should I say, Lucas first does the original story about their rise to triumph then has a prequel to set the stage. The time for the prequel is WW2.

    In this movie you would have the young coach (as a small child) be rescued by advancing Germans and adopted by the star player's father. Next you would have the star player's father be in the same platoon as the fathers of 7 other players on a mission that results in the capture of a German Officer who just happens to be the father of the School's athletic director. Next we have the daring rescue of a British unit that contains the fathers of the remaining team members and one father of the person who runs the scoreboard.

    Who would really want to watch that? It is childish and simplistic. It completely eliminates the true triumph of the original movie and team as in reality they met for the first time at college and learned to operate as a team. In the movie it was all predestined.

  147. if you take out your first part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your post is consistent, but you are a hypocrit and so I am sad. I agree that many view any other opinions than there own with scorn and you have proven that with your snotty post

  148. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are not suggesting that the sentence structure is incorrect are you? Because it "ain't" Introduce is abstract but you seem to be assigning it to people meeting people and the actions involved therein. I can introduce an idea to you and introduce you to an idea.

  149. never played Starcraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or have even seen it played but yet that was the first thing I thought of in the movie... odd

  150. There's an old saying . . . by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

    For those of you who don't get the joke, click here for a written explanation.

    For a more bandwidth-intensive explanation go to:
    http://www.brainthink.com/amusements/bush_fooled_a gain/bush_fooled_again.php

    There's a clip on that second page that's almost a meg large and I don't want the poor bastard getting /.ed--hence no hypertext link. /.'s lameness filter looks like it's putting an extra space in "again"; take out the space to get to the link.

    --
    I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
  151. Chewie & the droids by Iscariot_ · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to see Chewie back for one more film, however I hope he doesn't encounter R2 or C3P0 (on screen, or implied off screen). I'm already wondering how George is going to explain why Ben and others don't remember the droids, nor do they remember him.

    If Chewie encounters them, then that'll just be another "why'd they forget?" that needs explaining.

    Oh well...

  152. Re:Age-Big "furry" deal. by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

    " Best of luck to the ILM team that has to make the CG fur look right."

    Monsters Inc. and Ice Age shown it can be done.


    It's much easier to create realistic-looking CG fur, water, etc when the only other point of reference is more computer graphics. When you have a big, furry CG wookie standing next to a real human it better be really well done, or else it'll just look stupid.

    --
    I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
  153. Han Solo fits in like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the books that I have read frequently refer back to when Han was an Imperial Storm Trooper. When some of his "comrades" were mistreating wookies (who were used as slaves) something flipped and he ended up saving Chewie.

    This is also why Chewie owes Han a life debt.

    There you go. :)

    1. Re:Han Solo fits in like this... by mink · · Score: 1

      But if Han is a Storm Trooper, does this mean Han is a clone of Jingo Fet and that makes him the father of Boba.
      SW can make for a messed up episode of Springer.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  154. Contrived? by JKConsult · · Score: 1
    Not for nothing, but at the dorm my freshman year, there were quite a few people who were *very* into SW (shock, I know). They told me a few things that were buried into books and the like (this was back in '96), and some of these were included. So they weren't just spun out of the air for the movies.

    The Clone Wars, and Obi-Wan's involvement.

    The "Ben Kenobi" that Luke meets is a clone.

    Boba Fett was the model for the clone army.

    That Luke and Leia's children were the basis for Eps. 7-9.

    Really, that's all I remember. But I think it mitigates the "completely contrived" theory. I presume these things were in books, but I could be wrong.

  155. The Way It Happened by c05m0 · · Score: 1

    Ok, The movies were shown in this order 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3. Now here is the BIG problem. 4, 5, 6 were writen in a row. Simple they were good to the point and it was not changed really in any way from the script. 1, 2, 3 were designed after/during around the time of the other 3 then they were put on the big screen years later. Lucas decided to "Modernize" the series. And basicly re write his mistakes and explain things. He should have left them because I have a feeling that the Original Scripts would have done fine. I liked starwars, the first 3 but because of the media and the outlook on these movies we will never really experiance the original "magic" the movie gave us, because in the age of /. and P2P File sharing we will always know the ending and there will be no more surprises. I liked the good ol' days.

    --
    Master Of The Tessenjutsu - "He'll Cool you down and cut your arm off in one shot."
  156. ah, the traditional way of fixing a failing series by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    Try to re-hash old characters, jokes, and plotlines!
    It's a time-honored tradition, and bound to work!
    Creativity, what's that?

    Magius_AR

  157. 25 Lines From Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    25 Lines From Star Wars that can be improved if you substitute the word "Pants"

    1. A tremor in the pants. The last time I felt this was in the presence of my old master.

    2. You are unwise to lower your pants.

    3. We've got to be able to get some reading on those pants, up or down.

    4. She must have hidden the plans in her pants. Send a detachment down to retrieve them. See to it personally Commander.

    5. These pants may not look like much, kid, but they've got it where it counts.

    6. I find your lack of pants disturbing.

    7. These pants contain the ultimate power in the Universe. I suggest we use it.

    8. Han will have those pants down. We've got to give him more time!

    9. General Veers, prepare your pants for a surface assault.

    10. I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants back home.

    11. TK-421. . . Why aren't you in your pants?

    12. Lock the door. And hope they don't have pants.

    13. Governor Tarkin. I recognized your foul pants when I was brought on board.

    14. You look strong enough to pull the pants off of a Gundark.

    15. Luke. . . Help me take...these pants off.

    16. Great, Chewie, great. Always thinking with your pants.

    17. That blast came from those pants. That thing's operational!

    18. Don't worry. Chewie and I have gotten into a lot of pants more heavily guarded than this.

    19. Maybe you'd like it back in your pants, your highness.

    20. Your pants betray you. Your feelings for them are strong. Especially for your sister!

    21. Jabba doesn't have time for smugglers who drop their pants at the first sign of an Imperial Cruiser.

    22. Yeah, well short pants is better than no pants at all, Chewie.

    23. Attention. This is Lando Calrissean. The Empire has taken control of my pants, I advise everyone to leave before more troops arrive.

    24. I cannot teach him. The boy has no pants.

    25. You came in those pants? You're braver than I thought.

  158. The Lone Gunmen ? by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

    How can you pluralize The Lone Gunman?
    What do you mean?
    Well, if there are 3 of you, you aren't exactly "lone", are you?
    I have no idea what you're saying.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    1. Re:The Lone Gunmen ? by feepness · · Score: 1

      How can you pluralize The Lone Gunman?

      I'm assuming this is intended to be a clever reference to the Kennedy assasination.

      Specifically the Warren Commission Report stated that there was a "lone gunman", despite abundant evidence that many claim shows there were multiple shooters.

      The term "Lone Gunmen" therefore cleverly ridicules the widely accepted "truth" and indicates that those taking the name disagree with mainstream "facts".

      Of course what I was really referring to was a spoiler made by another editor last year!

    2. Re:The Lone Gunmen ? by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was a clever reference to Airheads, where the band name was "The Lone Rangers." The dialog was very similar.

      --
      "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
    3. Re:The Lone Gunmen ? by feepness · · Score: 1

      Chuckle. I figured you were just trying to be funny... not even sure why I bothered replying but I'm glad I did... have to rent that sometime.

  159. Take The Red Pill, Luke by WillASeattle · · Score: 1

    Or you'll be stuck in a series of trilogies with no meaning except to fund CGI server farms ...

    --
    > --- All Of The Above --- >