Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Original Trilogy Gets DVD Release Date

Angry Black Man writes "The Digital Bits is reporting that there is finally some official information from Lucasfilm regarding the release of the Star Wars OT (episodes IV, V, and VI) on DVD. The movies are coming to DVD in September of 2004. The animated series of Clone Wars shorts appearing soon on the Cartoon Network will also be released on DVD, possibly before the end of this year. The teaser campaign for Episode III will begin in January of 2005, leading up to the May theatrical release. Finally... Episode III will hit DVD in November of 2005."

432 comments

  1. WE'LL STOP ONCE MICHAEL SIMS IS FIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    How to get rid of these annoying Slashdot ads #1 go to mozilla.org and get mozilla for your platform.

    #2 install and go to slashdot.org

    #3 right click on ads and select "block images from this server"

    Slashdot has gone totally crazy with advertising. What they don't realize, is that by adding more ads they are making people more likely to block them. Get rid of these fucking banners and give us some text ads.

    1. Re:WE'LL STOP ONCE MICHAEL SIMS IS FIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how about just adding to your hosts file

      127.0.0.1 ads.osdn.com

      works with every browser.
    2. Re:WE'LL STOP ONCE MICHAEL SIMS IS FIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all ads come from ads.osdn.com

  2. hmmm by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the original trilogy i'll buy. that's all.

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So certain are you?

    2. Re:hmmm by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 3, Funny

      mmm. certain i am.

    3. Re:hmmm by ministerofsickeningr · · Score: 1

      unfortunately the DVD's for the trilogy have already been available in asia for a few years now. i hope there is some way to watch the movies without all the added CGI shit. and y'know what? i think the bluescreen errors in my copy of SWANH give it charm, dammit.

    4. Re:hmmm by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:hmmm by Johnny+O · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MMMMmmmm!

      (* Still clinging to his THX Widescreen Dolby Digital 6.1 Special Edition Laserdiscs and strokes them gently *)

      I have the original THX edition (non-special edition) laserdisc boxed set too....

      I wonder WHICH will be on the DVDs? I do kinda like watching the original versions too.

    6. Re:hmmm by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lot's of people are saying this, but I have no doubt this will be one of the biggest selling releases on DVD. Lucas is going to make millions off of this again, and probably a second time when he releases the super special edition of all six in one box. I doubt he's going to notice the few people who refuse to buy any version where Han doesn't shoot first. As much as I'd like to see that, I'm perfectly willing to accept whatever Lucas wants to sell.

    7. Re:hmmm by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      nice sig dude

    8. Re:hmmm by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      I hope so too. I just want the original versions with the usual low-key touching up, like taking out nasty static and trying to remove the lines around the leg of the giant killing animal in Jabba's palace.

      If I wanted Sarlak (sp?) to suddenly have a friggin beak sticking out, I'd ask for it! And don't get me started on the new, this time highly nauseating, singing scene in Jabba's pad with the closeup of the singer's protruding mouth.

    9. Re:hmmm by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      the original trilogy i'll buy. that's all.

      Uh huh, including Greedo shooting first and Jabba looking like a cutesy CG toy?

      The original original trilogy I'll buy. That's all.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    10. Re:hmmm by cparisi · · Score: 1

      Actually,

      I bought the Video CD (VCD) at Newbury Comics. It has Chinese subtitles and the quality is pretty poor, but at least it plays in most DVD players!
      Each movie is on two CDs.

    11. Re:hmmm by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      My question is, are these going to be REALLY original? No Greedo shooting first, no stupid Jabba the Hutt scene in ANH, no ring around the death star explosion? Those, I _WOULD_ pay for.

      The special edition crap, forget it.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    12. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admit, changing the sickly-sweet Ewok jub-jub tune was for the better.

    13. Re:hmmm by Ossadagowah · · Score: 1

      I think they should offer the Star Wars Holiday Special as one of the extras on these DVDs. It has all of the original cast and it is canon material. It also has a rather cool Boba Fett cartoon, for those folks out there who like the character.

      --
      anata sekai o kakumei surush ga nai deshou? Anata no susumu michi wa yoi shite arimasu.
    14. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has all of the original cast and it is canon material.

      True. And the Star Wars Holiday Special is better than the Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones.

    15. Re:hmmm by Jungleland · · Score: 1

      In theory he could put both versions on the same disk ala T2 and The Abyss. Question is, do you think he would lower himself to release his "unfinished films" on the general public? I hope so, but I doubt it..

    16. Re:hmmm by jceaser · · Score: 1

      I agree. Greedo shooting first is just wrong. Having Han shoot first adds a lot of credibility to him beeing a smuggler. Someone should setup a petition on the web (if already not done).

    17. Re:hmmm by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I like most of the new effects except for the "Greedo shoots first" scene.

      Yes, even the musical number.

      My real problem is when they switch back and forth between new effects and old effects during the battle of Yavin. The death surface star switches from being a giant 3d computer generated space fortress to a bunch of painted tupperware and lego belching sparks out at glowy things. And I wouldn't even notice the cheap nature of it if it was consistent - but the new effects just make it look so painfully bad.

      So, when can we expect The Ewok Adventure and Ewoks: the Battle for Endor special editions?

    18. Re:hmmm by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? It's the best part of the finale. It makes the whole victory seem more personal and intimate. The new version makes it a bigger thing.

      Since these movies really were effectively Space Westerns, it makes more sense to have the "local townfolk" rejoice at the end. Besides, what's cuter than Ewoks using stormtrooper helmets as bongo drums?

      Reminds me of an old joke:

      Q: How do you kill a stormtrooper?
      A: Put him in a Star Wars movie.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    19. Re:hmmm by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      See my sig. That is all.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    20. Re:hmmm by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      You say someone should set up a petition. Guess what? Here it is! I've signed it already. I hope this can get signed by the millions of Slashdot readers and maybe GL will take notice. The page today says the petition has 45,145 signatures.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    21. Re:hmmm by joshua_archer · · Score: 1

      This is all so much wishful thinking. It's already been stated by Lucas that the only versions that exist for him now of the original trilogy are the newest versions, with all the silly moralistic pandering and bad CG.

      I still have my VHS widescreen box set. Should probably look to getting them transferred to electronic media before they degrade.

  3. Finally. by MicktheMech · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been waiting for both this and Indy for a long time. I suppose good news comes in in waves. Or maybe it's just an apology for Episodes I and II.

    1. Re:Finally. by WesG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its almost like George wanted us to feel stranded without these DVD's.

      I wonder if this is how Luke felt when he wanted to go to Toshi Station and pick up some power converters... :-)

    2. Re:Finally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been waiting for both this and Indy for a long time. I suppose good news comes in in waves. Or maybe it's just an apology for Episodes I and II.

      I don't know, I think they've ruined the Indiana Jones movies as well. For example, all the firefights in the trilogies have been replaced with walkie-talkies.

    3. Re:Finally. by Oo.et.oO · · Score: 1

      i got a dvd set on eBay way back in the day which was i believe a rip from malaysian laserdiscs. they are of incredibly high quality (relative to other rips), have the same subs as the laser discs i had, have 5.1 audio, and didn't cost that much. I LOVE them.
      the original trilogy would be the only reason i keep a vcr around, now i don't have to. (it's in the basement for emergencies (porn)).

    4. Re:Finally. by rich951 · · Score: 1

      Well don't get too excited, you've still got a while to wait yet - especially if you want a complete box set :)

  4. Nifty. by kikensei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    About time. Too bad they'll likely never release the original theatrical release cut on DVD.

    1. Re:Nifty. by realdpk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah. I'm surprised the story didn't mention that. These are definitely not the original trilogy movies.

    2. Re:Nifty. by Liselle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have people forgotten how George Lucas works? How many VHS releases of the flipping original trilogy did we have? Keep an eye out for endless special editions and reworks until the day you die, conveniently spaced out and with enough extra materials to keep you coming back every time.

      On another note, I'm glad to hear he finally buried the hatchet over that damned Laserdisc business.

      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    3. Re:Nifty. by ajax0187 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm just surprised it took Lucas this long to release the original movies on DVD in the first place. It's easy money - we'd all like to get the original movies on a nice digital format. Instead they wait nearly a decade before they rerelease. With a track record for milking franchises like LucasArts has, this seems to be a rather foolish missed opportunity.

      --
      "By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth." - George Carlin
    4. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and so it goes. Hollywood releases a product that consumers don't want. Consumers go to video "pirates" to get what they want. Hollywood tries to shut down the "pirates" because they are supposedly selling cheap, poor-quality knock-offs.

      Meanwhile, in the real world, consumers continue to be willing to spend more than the cost of the "official" DVD to get the "good" DVD.

      Sad, really.

      Uh, incidentally. Anyone know where I can buy a DVD copy of something that's out there on laserdisc? Nothing particular in mind.

    5. Re:Nifty. by LordBodak · · Score: 2, Informative
      Although it won't be enough to make any difference I'm sure, if they don't release the original they won't be seeing any of my money.

      I hope Lucas is paying attention to the upcoming Alien Quadrilogy box set. All four movies, original cuts and extended cuts, each on a separate DVD, plus a bonus disc-- 9 DVD box set for a retail of $99.95. I'll be buying that and if Lucas does Star Wars like that they will sell tons and tons. Although they probably will anyway.

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    6. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goody gumdrops .. five shit movies, one semi-decent
      movie, one really Bad director and a whole bunch of
      stupid geeks to buy them

      slashdotite .. one is born every minute

    7. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll always have the originals on laser disk. At least until the player breaks and it isn't financially smart to repair it.

      Hell, anyone know a good way to transfer a laser disc to DVD? I mean without substantial loss in resolution.

    8. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, I'm glad to hear he finally buried the hatchet over that damned Laserdisc business.

      What hachet? Sounds juicy. I didn't know of any controversy surrounding the LD releases.

    9. Re:Nifty. by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention that originally the VHS cost around $100. I don't remember the exact price, but it was horribly steep.

    10. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100 wasn't an uncommon price for a VHS new release back in the day -- it was meant to be sold to rental stores, and then there would be a retail release a few months later.

    11. Re:Nifty. by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      Hatchet? Laserdisc? Please elaborate.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    12. Re:Nifty. by Liselle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bad wording on my part (it made sense in my head). The reason we hear from George Lucas why the DVD releases for the original trilogy were taking forever is that he doesn't have the time/materials to put together a collection like he can for the new prequels (except he dragged his feet on those, too, remember the net' campaign to get Episode 1 out on DVD before the heat death of universe?) They had a smaller budget, fewer behind the scenes things (because folks weren't concerned about it back then), etc etc.

      However, considering the massive fan base that the original trilogy has (screw special features, give us the movie)... many have speculated that he's dragging his feet because he was a big supporter of Laserdisc, and not DVD. Bitter? It's possibly hogwash, but I've grown tired of hearing the conspiracy, and I'm glad he's at least sort of answering the cries of the fans who want their high-quality DVDs.

      --
      Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    13. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the DVD FAQ states one of the features of DVD is "Automatic seamless branching of video (for multiple story lines or ratings on one disc)." So it wouldn't be that hard....

    14. Re:Nifty. by blixel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Keep an eye out for endless special editions and reworks until the day you die, conveniently spaced out and with enough extra materials to keep you coming back every time.

      I'm probably the only geek alive who hasn't seen a single Star Wars movie. Same reason I won't do drugs, I might get hooked. That, and I think Star * sucks.

    15. Re:Nifty. by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I saw the first one ("Episode One", goddamn it) in the theatre in it's first run in 197?. I've lost track, are they making another sequel again?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    16. Re:Nifty. by grahams · · Score: 1

      All four movies, original cuts and extended cuts, each on a separate DVD, plus a bonus disc-- 9 DVD box set for a retail of $99.95

      Not quite, but almost. In the Alien Quadrilogy there are 4 movie discs and 5 extra discs (one for each film and the "bonus disc" you referred to).

      Both cuts of each film (theatrical and extended) are contained on the same disc and it uses DVDs "Seamless Branching" functionality to show the right scenes depending on which version you chose to watch. This is both cool and efficient as there is little duplication of data (since the extended versions aren't really that much different from the theatrical versions)

    17. Re:Nifty. by asparagus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slightly simpler than that. An old friend of Lucas', first name Stevie, had an investment in an alternate dvd standard known as Divx, which died a slow, horrible death. Stevie, not wanting to kill his own tech, never released his male-Lara Croft movies on DVD, and got his good pal Georgie to keep his space opera off as well.

      That is, until recently, when Stevie finally saw the writing on the wall and said "#(*$ it."

      Which results in nifty new merchandise for you, the loyal consumer. Go forth! Buy shiny round things!

    18. Re:Nifty. by LordBodak · · Score: 1

      Yep, you're right. The specs I had read weren't clear on that.

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    19. Re:Nifty. by TotallyUseless · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct. Back then, the starting price for a VHS copy of a movie was ~$80 if you were lucky. Most were $90-$100.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    20. Re:Nifty. by brocktune · · Score: 1

      Alien box set for $100? That's $50 per non-crap movie. No thanks.

      Regarding the original post of original vs. Special Editions:

      The SW DVDs should be the original releases as seen in theaters. If the director and/or producer wants to add extra scenes as part of a extras disc, so much the better. I am on the fence regarding technical improvements. If it is a clear technical improvement, like removing the matte lines around the spaceships, I'm ok with it. If it changes the creative direction of the film in any way, it needs to be separated from the original.

    21. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's not quite seamless. Great idea, but a bitch to implement, particularly when you have multiple dub audio tracks where the timing of a cut might fall mid-word...

    22. Re:Nifty. by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Stevie, not wanting to kill his own tech, never released his male-Lara Croft movies on DVD, and got his good pal Georgie to keep his space opera off as well.

      Setting aside the lameness of trying to look cool by calling Spielberg "Stevie" and referring to the Indiana Jones movies as "male-Lara (sic) Croft movies," there's still a big hole in this theory: the Indiana Jones movies were a joint project between Lucas and Spielberg, and were more Lucas's than they were Spielberg's.
      All three films were written by Lucas (and others, but not Spielberg) and directed by Spielberg, with Lucas as executive producer and as an uncredited editor. If you consider the original Star Wars trilogy to be Lucas's, it's not that hard to consider the Indiana Jones series his too, since 2/3 of the original Star Wars trilogy had non-Lucas directors. As with the Star Wars movies, Lucas was the main creative force behind the Indiana Jones movies. He just used a director for the Indiana Jones movies who is more famous than Kershner and Marquand and, much as it pains me to say it, is a better director than Lucas (but is still highly overrated).
      Maybe you noticed that Lucasfilm's logo appears at the beginning of the movies, but Amblin Entertainments's does not (nor does that of Dreamworks SKG). That's because the Indiana Jones movies were Lucasfilm productions and Spielberg was only involved as the director. That's why George Lucas had the rights to make The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles (released on VHS as The Adventures of Young Indiana Jones) without Spielberg. It's also why Lucasfilm made a deal with Disney to develop the "Indiana Jones Adventure" attraction (and "Star Tours--" I believe it was a single deal for developing attractions based on both the Star Wars movies and the Indiana Jones movies) without Spielberg being involved.
      Anyway, getting back to the point, it seems to me the decision about the release of the Indiana Jones movies would be at least as much Lucas's as Spielberg's, and probably a lot more. So that kinda blows away the theory that Spielberg was holding off the release of "his" Indiana Jones movies on DVD because of a large investment in a rival compact videodisc standard.

      Did I just fall for a troll? I hope not.

      --Mark
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    23. Re:Nifty. by Zathras11 · · Score: 1

      If he wanted to, he could have slapped the same
      LaserDisc version on DVD and made some quick bucks
      and then come back later and revised it to his
      liking. We all know there will be multiple
      versions anyway. He likes to tinker. Thank GOD
      that some of the old school directors didn't do
      that. Can you imagine things like Citizen Kane
      being revised to add CGI characters!

    24. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sadly, the troll hast baited, and you have bit.

    25. Re:Nifty. by BDew · · Score: 1

      I dunno if you fell for a troll, but if you (sic) something you should really make sure that it is misspelled first. :)

      --
      "Fifty million Americans can't be wrong," said Rep. Billy Tauzin. Gore - 50,999,897 Bush - 50,456,002
    26. Re:Nifty. by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Slightly simpler than that. An old friend of Lucas', first name Stevie, had an investment in an alternate dvd standard known as Divx, which died a slow, horrible death.

      This theory would make a lot more sense if either the Indiana Jones movies or Star Wars had appeared in Divx format.

      --
      -Dave
    27. Re:Nifty. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Xmuch as it pains me to say it, is a better director than Lucas (but is still highly overrated).


      Why does it "pain" you? Hell, ANYONE would be better director than Lucas! Don't believe me? Just watch the new Star Wars Trilogy. Directing (and acting as a result) is clearly half-assed job. From what I have heard, he goes through the scenes with just handful of shots.. And he doesn't care if the end-results are less than stellar. "Don't worry about it, audience will be listening to John [Williams] music, instead of paying attention to the acting".
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    28. Re:Nifty. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      About time. Too bad they'll likely never release the original theatrical release cut on DVD.

      Ha! Dont be so sure -- with the recent propensity of the MPAA to suck the life out of fans by releasing so many minutely-different versions of movies, dont be surprised when you see a "Star Wars -- Limited Edition -- SupreDuperFancy --Original Theatrical Release" release.

    29. Re:Nifty. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Setting aside the lameness of trying to look cool by calling Spielberg "Stevie" and referring to the Indiana Jones movies as "male-Lara (sic) Croft movies,"

      Setting aside the fact that this persons' snide and condescending tone offended your Super-Fan-Boy-ness causing you to rally to the defense of a mass-media barron and his products as if they(or their creators) means something to you personally.

    30. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense.

      The original Star Wars trilogy was a killer app for DVD if I ever saw one. Lucas knows that. Fox knows that. The release of the trilogy on DVD is a relatively huge event, and I think it was carefully held back until its release would generate the most hype.

      George Lucas may have made some questionable creative decisions in his career, but I can't recall a time when he's made a poor business move.

    31. Re:Nifty. by Darth23 · · Score: 1

      Star Wars has been released several times on VHS in the TWENTY PLUS YEARS that it's been out. How many times has Jaws been released on vhs? Or the Godfather? Or the Wizard of Oz. Nobody knows becuase no one obsessively keeps track of that information. Movies come out on video, they're in stock for a while, then eventually they go out of print, and if there's demand they're released again several years later. It's not Lucas' fault if a few fans out there feel the need to own EVERY release of EVERY Star Wars movie. Compare the single DVD releases we have from Star Wars so far to the numerous versions of Terminator 2 that have come out. in the last few years.

      --

      -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

    32. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD already had their "killer app" -- it was called The Matrix. At this point DVD is the mainstream consumer standard.

      Lucas did the killer app thing with LaserDisc and his boxed set release that introduced THX branding. But, now he's several years too late to really make any impact on the market.

    33. Re:Nifty. by mykepredko · · Score: 1

      I remember a Harrison Ford interview saying that the reason why it took so long for the Indy Jones series to get onto DVD was due to the difficulty in all the owners (ie Spieldberg, Lucas, Ford and the producers couldn't agree on how to release the set). My understanding is that the current release was due to them just agreeing because they felt they were loosing money.

      myke

    34. Re:Nifty. by aflat362 · · Score: 1

      Why diss a movie you haven't seen?

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    35. Re:Nifty. by blixel · · Score: 1

      Why diss a movie you haven't seen?

      Didn't realize I was "dissing" anything, let alone Star Wars.

    36. Re:Nifty. by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty dismissive calling Lucas the "main creative force" behind Indy. Maybe the ORIGINAL creative force, but certainly not main.

      Yes, he came up with the character (of course, by "came up with" I mean blatantly lifted from pulp adventure stories such as Allan Quartermain, but all art is derivative anyway)

      Yes, he came up with the story. But he didn't write the screenplays, and he didn't direct the movies. He provided funding, and was the initial "idea man", but I think the brilliance of say, Raiders, is due largely to Spielberg and Lawrence Kasdan (who also wrote Empire and Jedi)

      And yeah.. as another poster asked... why on earth does it "pain you" to admit Spielberg is a better director? Lucas has proved time and time again (in the last 20 years, anyway) that he is an awful director. Ep 1 & 2 are badly written, badly acted toy commercials.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    37. Re:Nifty. by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1

      Two people have asked why it "pains me" to say that Spielberg, though massively overrated, is a better director than Lucas. Both mention Eps I & II. OK, but then I'd like to know why it is that when people talk about Spielberg, nobody talks about 1941, which was worse than Episode I. The reason it "pains me" to say Spielberg is better than Lucas is because Lucas directed one of my favorite movies ever (the original Star Wars).
      Also, as I mentioned, I feel Spielberg is wildly overrated, and I don't want to help continue the myth that he's one of the great directors of our time. I won't say he's a bad director, but he is considered one of the all-time greats by many people, and I just don't see it (Don't even get me started about Tom Hanks!).

      As the question of whether Lucas was the main creative force behind Indiana Jones, he was credited as the writer of the story for each of the three IJ movies, and as a creator of characters in the third. The credits of the third movie (see last link) treat creation of the characters and the story writing Lucas did as separate things. While other writers were involved in the writing of the screenplays, the stories are credited to Lucas (with Philip Kaufman in Raiders and with Menno Meyjes in Last Crusade... and no, it didn't escape me that the worst of the three movies is the one where nobody cowrote the story with Lucas... I don't think he's perfect as a director or as a writer, but I think he is the key "idea man" behind the greatness of both the original SW series and the IJ series).
      Just as I've been accused of being a "fanboy" and defending Lucas because of my emotional attachment to the original Star Wars, I will ask if those who have developed a lower opinion of Lucas because of Eps I & II (I will mention that I see a huge difference between them-- I haven't been able to bring myself to watch Ep I again since the first time in May of 1999, and I've watched Ep II a few times) might not be unfairly denying his previous accomplishments, like the good work he did on the first three SW films and the IJ films (even if he wants to keep fiddling with the SW movies). Yeah, Ep I is crap and Ep II is flawed. Does that mean we have to retroactively deduct "points" from Lucas for the things he did in the creation and production of two outstanding trilogies of films?

      --Mark

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    38. Re:Nifty. by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1
      I dunno if you fell for a troll, but if you (sic) something you should really make sure that it is misspelled first. :)

      The "sic" is an old habit from other threaded discussions. By writing "sic" there, I'm saying that the hyphen between "male" and "Lara" is not mine (it was already like that in the previous post), but I take responsibility for any errors in the spelling, grammar, or content of my part of the post.

      --Mark
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    39. Re:Nifty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That, and I think Star * sucks.

  5. Please please please let it be the original!! by tstoneman · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I hope Lucas has come to his senses and will offer the original, non-CGI version of Star Wars!

    1. Re:Please please please let it be the original!! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      And maybe monkeys will fly out of my ass. I'm not betting on either event to ever take place.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Please please please let it be the original!! by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      And maybe monkeys will fly out of my ass. I'm not betting on either event to ever take place.

      How I wish for the days when I could say the same...

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:Please please please let it be the original!! by rediguana · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't see why they can't do it like some other DVD's. When you start them up you get the choice of watching the theatrical version or the special edition. It would be nice to have the ability to watch the original or updated version and have them on the one DVD. I think Independence Day was one such DVD.

    4. Re:Please please please let it be the original!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Keeps a close eye on RatBastard's ass*

    5. Re:Please please please let it be the original!! by Parnic · · Score: 1

      I'd be satisfied with a simple option when you start the disc to play "special edition" or just original cut, the same way some releases do widescreen or full screen choice. But, as previously stated, all we can do is hope.

  6. Remastered? by typobox43 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will these be the remastered versions of the original trilogy that were released in the 90s, or will these be the "true" originals?

    1. Re:Remastered? by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I was unaware their was a difference minus audio improvements and a chemical bath for the film to brighten up the colors.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:Remastered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were quite a number of differences in the re-release. Off the top of my head, there was a lot of use of CGI to add lots of filler critters in Mos Eisley, a new scene with a CGI Jabba, the addition of the then-faddish "planar ring" explosion effect to the destruction of the Death Star, and of course the infamous editing so that Greedo shoots first in the cantina.

      No doubt there's a fan site somewhere that lists every single change frame-by-frame.

    3. Re:Remastered? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Right! I want to see the non-politically correct original version of E4. You know, where Han shoots first.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    4. Re:Remastered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think someone is getting the remastered version confused with the special edition. The remastered version came out with this big promo "One Last Time".. Final chance to get it... Remastered in THX, and all that. Then a few years later(not quite sure how many) they released the special edition that added the stuff you mentions. The remastered ones weren't released in theathers the special editions were.

    5. Re:Remastered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, thanks. :) Got my terminology a bit confused.

    6. Re:Remastered? by Gago · · Score: 1

      Indeed... I do want to see Han shoot first. I am also not exactly fond of the scene where Jabba comes and threatens Han beside the Falcon in IV, not of the weird MTV-like clip in VI. Both completely ruin the rythm of the films.

      Sometimes it looks like when Lucas has to make a sapce opera out of a few grey painted cardboxes it turns out great, but if you give him everything he needs to concretise his actual vision of the films, it turn out very much "me love you long time sucky-sucky".

      Long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, there were a team of people who designed a nifty universe together. Years later, one of them seems to believe he had it all figured out himself and takes himself for a director, while he's just a good special effect specialist.

      Delusions of grandeur...

  7. Official? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "official information" is from an anonymous source on Aint It Cool News.

    1. Re:Official? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yes, I don't believe it until I see it from starwars.com.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Official? by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      Hence it being on the page titled "Rumor Mill". Still I've read this site since 1998 and Bill Hunt's sources have proven to be pretty reliable. Probably the reason the source is anonymous is due to non-disclosure issues.

    3. Re:Official? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they were referring to The Digital Bits' inclusion of it in the Rumor Mill, but people believing anything on AICN (worst. design. ever.) to be true.

      I guess they're worried that Harry will eat anyone who doesn't believe it. :p

    4. Re:Official? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't verify September... I'd think October or November, but who knows, they could manage to keep it on schedule. Regardless, in time for Christmas shopping. George put out Ep I for Xmas 2001; Ep II for Xmas 2002; Indy trilogy Xmas 2003; SW trilogy Xmas 2004; Ep III Xmas 2005. Not rocket science, just good business. Don't count on a fixed date for a while yet, though. Things tend to slip, especially if new footage and/or audio mixes are being produced.

  8. Please, please please please . . . by Momomoto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tell me that Han shoots first in the new DVD.

    --
    "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
    1. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize I'm dumb, but can someone please explain this? I don't get it.

    2. Re:Please, please please please . . . by PoisonousPhat · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, unfortunately, Greedo and Han will each have their blaster replaced by a device that looks like a high-tech walkie talkie.

      --
      Losers choose to abuse the use of "loose".
    3. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? explanation please

    4. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the original Han shoots first and is the only shot.
      In the cover up, sorry, special edition Han shoots second with Greebos first shot going wide.

    5. Re:Please, please please please . . . by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the original release of the film, Han shot Greedo in Mos Eisley before Greedo shot him. Ergo, Han is a bold blooded outlaw.

      In the re-release in the late nineties, Greedo shoots first, misses by almost exactly one baseball stadium, and then Han shoots. Ergo, Han is a lucky fool with slow reactions.

      Lucas completely changed the introduction we have to Han in order to make it more "kid friendly," a la the walkie-talkies for guns bit in E.T.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    6. Re:Please, please please please . . . by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      In the original Star Wars Episode IV that we all grew up on, Han Solo shot Greedo before Greedo could shoot Han in the cantina. In the re-issued Star Wars Episode IV Special Edition, Lucas added several scenes, and changed that scene so that Greedo shot, missed, and Han retaliated.

      See, he turned Han into less of a bad-ass smuggler.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prince Charles buttfucked his manservant -- and was caught doing it by Diana! NOT News at 11... because no media will report it in the UK.

    8. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Khomar · · Score: 1
      Quite honestly, I like many of the new changes in the "Special Edition". For example, I liked the addition of windows in the Cloud City scenes. It really did open it up and make it feel more like it was... well, a cloud city! The battle scene was also well done at the end of Star Wars. These changes I can see being justified by the "we could not afford them at the time" excuse.

      However, there were two scenes that bothered me greatly: the aforementioned Guido scene (shudder) and the new musical number in Jabba's palace. As has been pointed out elsewhere, the Guido scene totally changes your view of Han Solo. The same is the case for the "musical" number. It completely wrecks the mood of Jabba's palace which was to be dark and forboding. In both cases, Lucas has blunted his original vision and diminished the series as a result.

      Lucas, if you are listening, please replace these two scenes with the original -- or at the very least, release the films in their original format. If you are not listening, perhaps you should give it a try. It certainly couldn't hurt given your last few tries...

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    9. Re:Please, please please please . . . by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "a la the walkie-talkies for guns bit in E.T."

      Is that what sparked the Indiana Jones ep of South Park? Never heard that ET was edited that way.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Danse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that what sparked the Indiana Jones ep of South Park? Never heard that ET was edited that way.

      Yep.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    11. Re:Please, please please please . . . by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Greedo was in the middle of a sentence and it makes absolutely NO sense for him to take a badly-aimed shot at Han then.

    12. Re:Please, please please please . . . by smackjer · · Score: 1

      Why do so many people call Greedo "Guido"? AFAIK, he wasn't even Italian.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:Please, please please please . . . by mikeboone · · Score: 1

      I haven't gotten ahold of the Indiana Jones DVDs yet, but hopefully Jones still shoots the fat guy with the big sword too!

    14. Re:Please, please please please . . . by IncredibleCrisis · · Score: 1

      At least both "versions" of ET were made available.

    15. Re:Please, please please please . . . by 3263827 · · Score: 1

      Christ on a fscking pogostick! Did you even watch the films? It's GREEDO, not GUIDO (the killer pimp) you maroon.

    16. Re:Please, please please please . . . by nighty5 · · Score: 1

      Can somebody describe what Han shoots first is all about?

    17. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Hooded+One · · Score: 1

      I didn't think there was anything inherently wrong with the music scene; I don't think Jabba was intended to be that "dark," even when I watched the original version. He's just your average gangster, in slug form. He doesn't kill out of bloodlust, but to protect his business, and for amusement.

      As far as the Greedo edit goes, I think it was a silly edit, but not a travesty, sort of like the edit they did on the Death Star explosion. After all, Han was still an asshole for pretty much the entire first film.

      But yes, most of the other edits were just good.

    18. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      a woman's razor?

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    19. Re:Please, please please please . . . by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      Quick, someone register freehat.org

    20. Re:Please, please please please . . . by fermion · · Score: 1
      I think the Hans thing has more to do with the character 'Harrison Ford" than the character "Hans Solo". Ford, who at the time was nothing, now has a Career, and thus becomes a reason for the new generation to watch the movie. See the star before he was a star thing. Who cares about Mark in his robes shooting things and Fisher in her funny hair. And you can't have the star be a villain.

      It also has to do with the changing nature of the story. When there was just 'Star Wars', Luke was the good guy, the innocent. His perfection allowed Kenobi to die peacefully, knowing that the stage had been set for his redemption. It allowed Hans to set aside his previously evil ways for the much less profitable life of the do-gooder.

      As the story progressed, the redemption of Hans became just a link in the ultimate job, which was Luke's avoidance of the sins of his father, and ultimately the redemption of this father. Hans, if left in his original character, becomes a plot device that is necessary to get Luke from A to B to C, and provide the proper character-strengthening challenges along the way. He also provides comic relief. Again, not a job for a star.

      Of course now that we have the back story, all this subsumes to the current big picture, which is the battle between Anikin and the Emperor. The Emperor is the Evil, while Anikin is the Innocent, much like Luke. And though in 1978 we believed a teenager could be an innocent, in 1999 we had to fabricate a child with the mind of a teenager to create believable innocence. In any case, the story is now one of three people: Anikin, Palpatine, and Kenobi. The later two corrupt Anikin. Kenobi is saved, Palpatine is merely killed. Anikin remains the misguided abused child, finding comfort only in death.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    21. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Fucking H Christ, can someone PLEASE stop the moderators from using words they don't fucking understand??

      Sorry Momomoto, I agree 100% with your sentiment, but there is NO insight in your post. Not one iota. But one dumbfuck moderator says "Hey, I agree with that, that makes this post insightful!" and the rest of the fucking sheep moderators go "baaaa, baaaa, we must mod in accordance lest we look like people who can think for themselves!". Interesting? Yes, sort of. Funny? Yes. Insightful? No! No! NO!. If you don't know what the word means, don't mod with it!

      FUCK! I can't believe I have to get angry about this shit.

    22. Re:Please, please please please . . . by plsander · · Score: 1

      Yes, Dr. Jones Jr. does plug the dude with the sword in the DVD set. No bowlerization here.

    23. Re:Please, please please please . . . by mlush · · Score: 1
      Can somebody describe what Han shoots first is all about?

      OK. In the cinamatic release of StarWars, when Greedo had Han at gunpoint in the Canteena. Han escapes by shooting Greedo. In the Special Edition the scene was changed using CGI so that Greedo shoots at Han first, misses, from a range of 3 feet!, then Han shoots and kills Greedo in self defense.

      Thats it

      At best its a pointless little rewrite

      At worst it changes Han's character from someone willing to kill in cold blood to someone willing to kill in self defense

    24. Re:Please, please please please . . . by robtm · · Score: 0

      Walking talking wookiee, don't think so.
      Or did I read that wrong?

    25. Re:Please, please please please . . . by Khomar · · Score: 1

      Pardon my little chuckle at your own mis-type... I assume you mean that I am a moron not someone marooned on a desert island somewhere. You are, indeed, correct. I blame my goof on a lack of sleep as the post was written after a very long, mind-numbing day. I hope you will forgive me for my error.

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    26. Re:Please, please please please . . . by 3263827 · · Score: 1

      I was actually paraphrasing Bugs Bunny. ;)

  9. hmm,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what do i do with my copies downloaded from Kazaa ?

    1. Re:hmm,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll be obsolete. But you can keep them if you want; maybe 45 years from now you can show your grandkids a genuine pirated movie from the old outlaw filesharing networks!

  10. DVD by Delphix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this going to be the special edition versions or the original?

    Having seen the original release in the theaters as a kid, I would love to have a copy of them on DVD, my VHS ones are starting to give up.

    Heck, I wouldn't mind a six disc set with both. I think there's still a lot of people out there who like them in their original form.

    1. Re:DVD by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with the original form, is that Lucas has stated, over and over again, that they will not be seen that way. Lucas considers the current "Special Editions" to be the definitive version.
      Supposedly he has even gone so far as to petition the Directors Guild for co-direction credits on Return of the Jedi based on the changes he has made to this film.
      I still love the films, although many of the changes i find annoying. But Lucas is not going to change his views now, he has proven time and again that he could care less what the fans of the original trilogy feel.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    2. Re:DVD by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Is this going to be the special edition versions or the original?"

      I'd like a blend in between. I'd like the cleaned up matte lines, the windows at the Bespin city, and the celebration after Death Star 2 exploded. All this and Han Solo shoots first.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:DVD by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 1

      The problem is, George knows the hard core fans will buy the movies no matter what he does. So as much as I love the original trilogy, the only way I can have any effect whatsoever on ol' George is to say screw it -- I'm sick of this crap and (as much as I'd like to) I'm never going to buy another non-pirated Star Wars movie again.

      If he wants money, he should take a page out of Peter Jackson's book (as far as dealing with fans) -- I'm happy to fork over $50 a year for both versions of each LOTR movie.

    4. Re:DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Buy either the Sound & Vision DVD or Video Essenetials and calibrate your fucking TV set and the matte lines will go away. You have your brightness and contrast turned up way to high, and I'm willing to bet your "picture" or "sharpness" setting is maxed out too. Here's a quick hint: sharpness = noise. But you're ignorance is probably beyond the scope of what can be covered in this post. Just get one of those DVDs. Also turn the bass down.

    5. Re:DVD by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
      I agree,

      but even if everyone who cared about this sort of thing didn't buy the dvd's and didn't go see the next movie, he is still going to make a buttload of money, so why should he care?

      I would say that the only hope so far, is that Raiders of the Lost Ark et al, was released as i remember it. So i guess there is a chance, but i have a feeling (gut only, no proof) that Speilberg was the driving force behind that, i use as evidence the re-release of ET which got both bad press for it's changes and made very little money.

      Unfortunately, everytime Lucas releases a "new" version of Star Wars, millions run out and buy it. Every time.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    6. Re:DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Lucas COULD care less, then that implies that he does care in the first place. You're looking for the correct addage: "He COULDN'T care less", which makes sense.

    7. Re:DVD by rob_au · · Score: 1
      I think there's still a lot of people out there who like them in their original form.


      Betamax or laserdisk? :-)

    8. Re:DVD by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Buy either the Sound & Vision DVD or Video Essenetials and calibrate your fucking TV set"

      Yeah, I suppose adjusting your TV so that subtle details don't go through would fix the problem of errors on the film.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  11. Itried to RTFA, but its on AICN by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Any word on wether its the ORIGINAL trilogy, or the one with the dinosaurs all over the place?

    Because, as far as I'm concerned, Han shot first, and I'm not paying to be told otherwise.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Itried to RTFA, but its on AICN by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      To heck with dinosaurs and Greedo shooting first, I want to see Biggs talking with Luke on Tatooine, like in the first theatrical run.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    2. Re:Itried to RTFA, but its on AICN by Jardine · · Score: 1

      That scene shows up on the "Star Wars: Behind the Magic" CD. I'm not sure what source they had for it though because it looks like ass.

  12. ANTICIPATION by andyring · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I'm willing to bet that this will be one of the most hotly desired DVD releases in the history of DVDs, and movie releases in general.

    Time to start checking Amazon for pre-orders!

    1. Re:ANTICIPATION by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah ... until the next big thing comes out, or a new viewing medium is invented.

      Yeah, i know this is star wars and this is the first time it is gracing this new playback medium and everyone is throwing flowers. Dancing in the streets. But look, its just a dvd. I mean, better quality sure. But the still same-old same-old.

      I'm just so burnt out on marketing speak these days. Anticipated DVDs. Box office smashers. Its all just talk to push product. And at the end of the day, it's all pointless.

      Yes - I'm having server problems today.

    2. Re:ANTICIPATION by spektr · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet that this will be one of the most hotly desired DVD releases in the history of DVDs, and movie releases in general.

      I know now how the people in the former soviet union felt when they stood in front of the empty shelves. What again was the reason they didn't release it earlier? According to the laws of free market, there must have been no demand for it... Otherwise somebody would have delivered. But on the other hand, if somebody had a monopoly... a monopoly granted by the state... then they could create an artificial shortage...

    3. Re:ANTICIPATION by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I mean, better quality sure. But the still same-old same-old.

      I second your blase attitude - my laserdiscs still play, better than DVD quality (sans film restoration) and it's the real version of the movie. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  13. A new hope-a great disappointment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And I predict the laserdisk version will shoot up in price. Why? Because you just know that Lucas is going to make "changes". Purists will just cry.

    1. Re:A new hope-a great disappointment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think of that. I've got the original laserdiscs of the original trilogy. Wow, the only digital copies of the uncut originals.

  14. Uggghhhh.... by BJH · · Score: 0, Troll

    That was all I saw, and it got me moist as a snack cake down there.

    Harry, you fat bastard, that's not the sort of image I want to be given in the morning. Excuse me while I go throw up.

    1. Re:Uggghhhh.... by Javaman97 · · Score: 1

      I found that disturbing too, but if you take a closer look, it's from someone writing to Harry, not Harry.

    2. Re:Uggghhhh.... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That makes my nausea slightly less intense.

    3. Re:Uggghhhh.... by Javaman97 · · Score: 1

      Yeah NP, that is an image everyone could do without.

  15. What's wrong Ben? by dswensen · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just felt as great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of Star Wars fans cried out in protest, and then suddenly stopped whining about "when is the Star Wars OT DVD coming out?"

    Ahhh.

    Now if only Lucas would truly take advantage of the DVD format and include both the original and "Special Editions" on the discs. But I'm not idealistic enough to actually hope for that.

    1. Re:What's wrong Ben? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Now if only Lucas would truly take advantage of the DVD format and include both the original and "Special Editions" on the discs. But I'm not idealistic enough to actually hope for that.

      Damn, that would certainly make a PERFECT "extra features" DVD that they usually drop into the box anyway. Damn it. It's too good to be true though.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:What's wrong Ben? by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't worry. That box set will come out in a few years. He just has to make sure that the people who really want one have to buy the other, first.

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  16. Let's just hope... by Bendebecker · · Score: 4, Funny

    George Lucas doesn't try to re-edit them. Hans Solo would look stupid waving a walkie talkie around.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
    1. Re:Let's just hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas doesn't try to re-edit them. Hans Solo would look stupid waving a walkie talkie around.

      He'd look even more stupid if he was waving a com link.

    2. Re:Let's just hope... by UWC · · Score: 1

      Or if he was named Hans. Amazing how such a simple typo can have such hilarious results. Or maybe it's because I'm groggy.

    3. Re:Let's just hope... by BJH · · Score: 1

      Heelo, mai neim is Hans und I cam frum Holland.
      Mai speecesheep deed the Kessel Ran ein less zan twelf paarzecs!

    4. Re:Let's just hope... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "George Lucas doesn't try to re-edit them. Hans Solo would look stupid waving a walkie talkie around."

      I just had this image of Greedo putting a walkie talkie to his ear and dying of cell phone radiation poisoning.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Let's just hope... by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      Come to Alderaan, see the loveli lakes.

      or

      Hans didn't even shoot Greedo. He was bitten by a moose.

      We're sorry for this post. Those who were in charge of it have been sacked.

      Swi
      --
      Load Clear

  17. But wait! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that gets my goat is that the original, theatrical, un-fiddled with Star Wars that we all fell in love with the first time will never, ever be on DVD. It's not fair.

    And if Lucas throws an even better super-special edition on DVD and never, ever sells the special edition ever again...well...it would be expected.

    Ah well, November 2005- who else is going to sit in of doors for many, many hours going through all 6 Star Wars movies? Anyone? Anyone?

  18. Note to Mr. Lucas by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I do hope that you're planning on including both the "old" and the "new" versions of the original trilogy.

    Why, you ask? For one simple reason, and I'm going to type this very, very slowly to make sure you don't mess this up:

    Han shoots Guido first.

    Ah! No, I don't want to hear how Han isn't a bad man. Shut it, George - you made some good movies, but I don't want to hear it.

    "Yes, I bet you have." BLAM! That's it - one shot. Deal with it.

    And if you plan on including any new scenes, I will pound you. I don't want to see this:

    Jar-Jar: No, it'sa not true! Messa is you father!
    Chewbacca: Aaaarrrghhhghg!

    Don't make us get the South Park kids to protect your own movies from yourself.

    1. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1
      Han shoots Guido first

      Well you did. His name is Greedo

    2. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by swingkid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Han shoots Guido first

      I didn't know Greedo was Italian. And dude, Italian -American please. "Guido" is not the preferred nomenclature.

    3. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by kook04 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Except that his name is Greedo, not "Guido".

      And even if you had gotten the name correct, you're like the 4th person to try that played out "insider" Star Wars joke already. Who gives a **** who shoots first?

    4. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Inebrius · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice that. If the original had Han shooting first, and then they only changed it for the 2nd release to make him more PC, then yes, it does make a difference.

    5. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by BJH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then Luigi blows away Han, and then the Porcionis from Betelgeuse and Mussalinis from Altair get into a vendetta, and Jabba is blown away in a driveby shooting....

    6. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize Fellini directed that film?!

    7. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by jaeson · · Score: 1

      Han shoots Guido first.

      I think I know why Han shoots Guido:

      "He gavea my food a bad review, so I cut off a horses head and put it in his bed and guess what?!?! He atea the horses head and gave it a bad review!" --Guido

      Er, Don't you mean Greedo?

    8. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say??!?!

      Does this mean we won't ever see a Python 2.4?

    9. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      ..and as the mystery shooter drove off, he was heard to say, "it's a-me, Mario"..

    10. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you're posting your note to George Lucas here on Slashdot, where he's certain to see it!

    11. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Kpau · · Score: 1

      I can't stand it anymore... its GREEDO... not Guido. And I agree... changing that scene really damaged the character development and the ambience. Worse than the freaking Ewoks...

    12. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar-Jar: No, it'sa not true! Messa is you father!
      Chewbacca: Aaaarrrghhhghg!


      No, Itchy is Chewie's father. Itchy lives with Chewbaccas wife ( Mala) and son ( Lumpy). We found that out from the Holiday Special.

    13. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by SoLoatWork · · Score: 1

      It's not nice to make fun of people with speech impediments.

    14. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by Bobman1235 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And dude, Italian -American please. "Guido" is not the preferred nomenclature.

      Walter, I'm not talking about the guys who build the railroads here....

    15. Re:Note to Mr. Lucas by spruce · · Score: 1

      Walter, I'm not talking about the guys who build the railroads here....

      That scene really tied the movie together.

  19. Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much will this hot little item be? Any word?

    Shameless plug:
    Blogzine

    1. Re:Price? by freeze128 · · Score: 1
      How much will this hot little item be?
      "Ten Thousand?!?! We could almost buy our own ship for that!"
    2. Re:Price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but who's going to play the disc, kid, you?

      You bet! I'm not such a bad DeCSS ha>or, myself.

  20. Holiday Season by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1

    I would have thought they would have released it this year before the holiday season since they are going to start the Clone War cartoons soon. I would have released them on DVD to get the younger market that hasn't seen and doesn't own the movie yet. (DVD > VHS)

  21. Bonus disk & outtakes by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From a bit further down the page:
    Also, Lucasfilm has said in the past that there aren't a lot of behind-the-scenes materials available for the original films, so having a single bonus disc of extras (as opposed to three) would make life easier for them.

    I thought I remembered quite a bit of info on various "making-of" shows that showed the original models, how they did cutting-edge special effects on a shoestring budget, and the occasional flaws that made it through (like a TIE fighter shadow where the fighter itself had been removed).

    Of course, nowadays I guess we expect someone to be filming the entire filmaking process for the express purpose of creating the ultimate making-of special. When even a film like Monsters, Inc., where every frame requires painstaking design and hours of rendering time, has "outtakes", "deleted scenes", and "goofs". Soon, we'll have cameramen following the cameramen, so we can see "The Making Of 'The Making Of "Star Wars VII: Attack Of The Menacing Phantom Jedi Clone Empire"'"

    You know... maybe, just maybe, Lucas & co. should spend more time telling a coherent story with believable characters, and less time worrying about how he'll look in the outtakes?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Bonus disk & outtakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon, we'll have cameramen following the cameramen, so we can see "The Making Of 'The Making Of ...'"

      You mean kind of like LOTR Director Peter Jackson carrying around his own personal video camera during filming specifically for the DVD Extras??

    2. Re:Bonus disk & outtakes by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know... maybe, just maybe, Lucas & co. should spend more time telling a coherent story with believable characters, and less time worrying about how he'll look in the outtakes?

      Uh, this is George Lucas you're talking about. We'll all be playing Duke Nukem Forever while we are driven to work by robotic hover car before he puts time into creating believable characters.

    3. Re:Bonus disk & outtakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so we can see "The Making Of 'The Making Of "Star Wars VII: Attack Of The Menacing Phantom Jedi Clone Empire"'"

      Wow, with that wit you could get a job naming Wayan's brothers movies.

    4. Re:Bonus disk & outtakes by DoctorRad · · Score: 1
      I thought I remembered quite a bit of info on various "making-of" shows that showed the original models, how they did cutting-edge special effects on a shoestring budget, and the occasional flaws that made it through (like a TIE fighter shadow where the fighter itself had been removed).

      Yeah, that was part of a BBC 'Horizon' SFX show from the mid-80s IIRC. Also showed how the shuttle landing on Endor was built up from multiple exposures using computer controlled models. I think The Temple Of Doom was also featured in this programme.

      Aren't there also some supremely rare japanese Star Wars documentary Laserdiscs? Someone help me out here!

      Matt...

  22. 2005!? by Qui-Gon · · Score: 2, Funny
    The teaser campaign for Episode III will begin in January of 2005, leading up to the May theatrical release. Finally... Episode III will hit DVD in November of 2005.

    Wow... Only 2 years away! Thanks for the heads up.

    --

    We are blind to the Worlds within us
    waiting to be born...
    1. Re:2005!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking a cue from those Star Wars Guitars from a while back, the release will be followed in 2006 by Longhorn: Star Wars Edition with a Star Wars themed desktop and C-3PO and R2-D2 as fully 3D virtual assistants.

      "Hello. My name is C-3PO. Human-Longhorn relations (ewww) cyborg. I am fluent in more than 6 million .NET languages and XML dialects."

  23. great! by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to download proper dvd-rips off kazaa of the first three movies...

    Fuck the MPAA!

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've already got them (from our local file sharing network).

      They're not very high quality, but they're in widescreen. Ooh! I can see the scrolling titles completely!

      And NO, I'm not posting a .torrent.

      P.S. If you are associated with the MPAA, I'm just kidding.

    2. Re:great! by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Fuck the MPAA, sure; but don't fuck copyright laws.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have heard through a rumor that all three were available in divx format off kazaa...650M or so each, of the re-release version...rumor also has that they are damn good quality...or so I have heard.

    4. Re:great! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I thought it was established that Lucasfilm is not a member of the MPAA. IIRC, Fox is merely a distributor for Lucasfilm movies.

  24. Star Wars show by Nonki · · Score: 0

    "...seems that they have TWO Star Wars television ideas floating around the ranch...one would be animation and the other - LIVE ACTION."

    A live action Star Wars series...I wonder where in the timeline it will be based? Well, if it's made with half the quality of the movies, it should really be something to look forward to.

  25. Here we go again! by Nate+B. · · Score: 0, Troll

    The anti-RIAA/MPAA crowd falls all over themselves to hand the henchmen of the cartel their money. What happened to principle? Oh yeah this is Slashdot...

    I guess I'm the only Slashdotter left who hasn't bought a DVD player and hasn't harmed the defense of digital liberty by feeding the cartels.

    Sad. Just sad.

    --

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    1. Re:Here we go again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very right, but most likely you will get unfairly modded down -1 troll because hypocrites love sweeping the truth under the rug.

      Stupid slashdot niggers.

    2. Re:Here we go again! by deek · · Score: 1
      • I guess I'm the only Slashdotter left who hasn't bought a DVD player and hasn't harmed the defense of digital liberty by feeding the cartels.

        Sad. Just sad.
      You know, you don't _have_ to buy CDs/DVDs from RIAA/MPAA groups. There's plenty of media available that doesn't fit into that category. Buy a region-free player, and you have a selection from around the globe.
    3. Re:Here we go again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad indeed. By refusing to buy a DVD player, you miss out on a huge amount of material that has nothing to do with the "cartels".

      And on top of that, you feel the need to try and make the rest of us guilty, without even knowing if we've supported the evil you hate so much.

      Go martyr yourself somewhere else, please.

  26. Sounds bogus to me by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1
    The guy's description of the Episode III footage sounds like something a fanboy would dream up.

    Then again, this is George Luca$ we're talking about.

    1. Re:Sounds bogus to me by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Epidoe III: Lowered Expectations

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  27. starwars is turning out to be bunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Man, I sure wish he woulda' left starwars alone after the "last 3" were completed.. These new ones have made a discrace out of the jedi.

  28. I hope it's the *real* original by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    I hope they are also releasing the true originals, not just the remade originals from several years back. I was not entirely impressed by those. There were some definite improvements, but some things weren't. They were far too busy, with all sorts of things moving around and buzzing that weren't there before. And frankly, they didn't need to be. I think Lucas was acting like a kid in a candy store, "Hey let's do this and this and this, because we can!"

    I really want to have the originals on DVD so I can remember Star Wars how it originally was.

  29. It's too late by deek · · Score: 1

    At one stage, I was all for buying the original Star Wars trilogy on DVD, when it was eventually released. Unfortunately now, due to the near complete cock-ups that have been Episodes I and II, my attitude to Star Wars has cooled tremendously. I just can't view Star Wars with the same excitement that I originally did.

    The irony of the whole situation is that, had Lucas released the original trilogy on DVD a few years ago, they would certainly have been part of my collection. Thanks Mr. Lucas. You've killed Star Wars for me.

    1. Re:It's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that ;-p

      -- vranash

  30. Not quite accurate... by psoriac · · Score: 1

    If you read the actual report, they only say that "the original trilogy is due for release"... they don't specify whether it's a theatrical or DVD release. Knowing Lucas, I wouldn't put it past them to try to milk the original trilogy in the theaters one more time to cap off the prequel trilogy.

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  31. IMO Old Star Wars sucked by dougnaka · · Score: 1, Funny
    Star Wars was ok for the time, but talk about people ignoring bad acting for special effects. Now the special effects are the bad kind of "special" and the bad acting ruins the show. I bought the last re-re-release, and watched it once, I can't believe how un-entertaining it is. I mean, people whine about Jar-Jar and there you have Luke freakin Skywalker barely remembering his lines.

    The best things to come out of Star Wars are the Star Wars kid, and the Star Wars rap.

    Mmmmm that's a mighty fine Gin 'n Tonic R2, why don't ya mix me up anotha'

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
    1. Re:IMO Old Star Wars sucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talk about people ignoring bad acting for special effects

      Yeah, forget whether Han shoots first, I want to know whether in the first one, has the scene been changed where Luke returns to base having just destroyed the Death Star, leaps out of his fighter, looks at Leia and yells "Carrie!" Is that still there?

      Star Wars was revolutionary if kinda silly, Empire was lame, Jedi I couldn't stand to watch even on cable it was so bad. Sounds like how the Matrix is shaping up. Episodes I/II don't even deserve mention. A waste of money, film, and CPU cycles, those.

      The original unretouched theater cut of Star Wars might have nostalgia value, but if it isn't that and exactly that, forget it. No sale on the rest of 'em. You can't polish a turd, Beavis.

  32. I have a set of the OT NON se on DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi guys, i have a copy of the original trilogy for sale, DVD, the NON SE edition.. its a transfer from the Definative Collection Laserdisc Set thats KILLER Quality. email me for more info:

    fen2k@yahoo.com

  33. AWESOME!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to see what BITCHIN' new anti-technology legislation the MPAA will lobby for using the proceeds from my DVD purchase! I bet it'll be sweet! Maybe they'll outlaw photons!

    I'm gonna pre-order two copies, like TODAY!!!

    Jack V., this one's for you, you lovable dinosaur! Maybe you can buy yourself a computer and see what the fuss is about.. while they're still legal that is!! HA HA!

  34. Holiday Special? by RatBastard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the bonus disc will have the Holiday Special and we can laugh with glee at such gems of humor and "It will be delievered by hand, solo." Oh, how we laughed with glee and mirth.

    Excuse me. I think i need to trow up now.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Holiday Special? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think i need to trow up now.

      Wouldn't that line make you want to drop trow instead of trow up?

    2. Re:Holiday Special? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      Oh, the holiday special on DVD would rule!

      With Jefferson Starship...get it? Jefferson Starship

  35. Sucks don't it? by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DVD has the technology to allow you to watch the original cut of the film or the special edition yet Lucas will just say that the original cut wasn't his original vision for the film. Yeah right, the first film was nearly chopped around and turned into a TV series. The original Star Wars release doesn't have the Episode IV: A New Hope at the start either, that was slipped in later. The original versions need to be seen in the context of when they were made.

    1. Re:Sucks don't it? by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, but the original trilogy really WASN'T what Lucas intended, so that's not what you'll see. Finally, Lucas's vision of A New Hope, in which Luke was really Jar Jar's great-grand nephew, and the storm troopers were all ewoks, will FINALLY be seen. Damn, I gotta go start camping out in front of Best Buy right now so I can be the first in line for this!! ...

      gag.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Sucks don't it? by killerkalamari · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay.. here's what we should do to resolve this when these DVD's come out. I say we can use the best of both to enjoy a better product than the current LD rips. 1) Use the DVD as a base. I would say that most of the changes don't matter much to the fans. The obvious scenes would need to be fixed. 2a) For the screwed up scenes do a high quality LD rip using the best image capture card and highest resolution available, then shrink each frame to to DVD image size. The rip needs to be high quality so it doesn't contrast with the DVD as much. We should do this now while working LD players are available. 2b) Modern laserdiscs (including THX Star Wars) have a digital track for the audio. This means we should be able to get a direct digital rip with no analog step. I wonder if this high quality audio can somehow be enhanced for 5.1, or maybe just leave it and have the amplifier do the Dolby ProLogic decoding. Encode shot as a DVD chapter. 3) Switch to the captured LD version for the shot, then resume the DVD after the shot is over. The fan only needs to install the patches he/she cares about. 4) Burn the fixed DVD and enjoy DVD Star Wars. Until then I will hope my Pioneer LD player doesn't break down :) BTW-- There are potential problems with the music. Some remixing might be necessary to patch things up. calamari

    3. Re:Sucks don't it? by wooger · · Score: 1

      Are you aware that there are Laserdisc rips converted to DVD format of these films floating around on the internet?

      This was done at least 6 months ago I believe.

    4. Re:Sucks don't it? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Maybe the original scenes should be on the disc, at least then you might be able to make a playlist.

    5. Re:Sucks don't it? by WmHBlair · · Score: 1
      The original Star Wars release doesn't have the Episode IV: A New Hope at the start either, that was slipped in later.

      Uh ... no, not so. It most certainly did; it was not "slipped in later." I saw the original release of Star Wars, in 1977, more than a dozen times, in fact. But, I, and everyone with me that day (we had left work to see the very first showing in Charlotte, NC on opening day), immediately commented, aloud, when we saw "Episode IV" in the crawl, "What happened to the first three!?"

      Within a minute, it was clear that this was no ordinary movie, and that whatever happened in the first theee episodes would somehow, someday, be revealed.

  36. Phantom editors? by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I suppose someone with the original versions on VHS could restore the "Special" editions somewhat. I'd put up with momentary quality losses.

    1. Re:Phantom editors? by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      Someone already has. And that was from the laserdisc release with surround sound...

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  37. Learn fron the LOTR people! by syberanarchy · · Score: 1

    Release ALL SIX as one big giant 20 disc set with extra features and the original triliogy and the special editions!

    1. Re:Learn fron the LOTR people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you see first they have to release the Special DVD Editions of the original trilogy with even more editing, addition footage, and special effects. Then, once everyone has bought that and learned that the DVD editions are entirely different from both the original and SE releases, Lucasfilm will release the SE versions on DVD 5-10 years later. After another 5-10 years, Lucasfilm will release the Original Theatrical release of the original tilogy. Give it another 5-10 years before lucasfilm will release the box set containing all three editions of the original trilogy. You'll still have to purchase the prequels separately.

      By this time, 15-30 years have passed since the prequels were released so Lucasfilm will commemorate the occasion by rereleasing the prequels with additional footage and new special effects... leading to the Phanton Menace SE, etc. And no, the SE WILL NOT get rid of Jar Jar. The DVD release for these will follow the same pattern as the original trilogy so that finally, after about 100 years, anyone still alive will be able to have every single edition of Star Wars ever released.

    2. Re:Learn fron the LOTR people! by syberanarchy · · Score: 1

      Strangely, this all makes sense...maybe I have a future in marketing ;)

  38. Wouldn't want send the wrong message by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, he won't even shoot at all. Greedo will instead be killed by his own shot reflecting back at him. Every time Han gets in a fire fight, or is otherwise in danger, he will escape only through dumb luck and ingenuity cleverly disguised as incompetence. It will also be revealed that he is related to Jar Jar Binks from the later triology, a scene which was unfortunately left on the cutting room floor, but was always intended to be a major part of the story. Han Solo has always been related to Jar Jar Binks; Lucas definetly did not make that up later.

    This is how he was meant to be portrayed all those years ago, but the technology just wasn't there. Han was never a greedy, violent outlaw. That simply wasn't the case. The audience just mis-interpreted the character. In fact, Han's original signature costume was a pink jumpsuit with bunny ears and gumdrops affixed across the chest to create a rainbow smile, a technology that didn't exist in the 70's. Now, with CG fairies buzzing around him, singing a merry tune throughout the entire film, George Lucas will finally be able to realize his perfect vision of the Han Solo character.

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    1. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by Kataklyzm · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I do honestly wonder what additional changes will be a part of the DVD release. So very many movies come out as 'special' dvd editions differing somewhat, sometimes greatly, from the versions we all saw in the theater. After what Lucas did with the special editions a few years back I am certainly even less enthused about this upcoming DVD release.

      If we can't get the Han shoots first version hopefully we'll get at least the Geedo shoots first version an nothing else changed.

    2. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, that's hilarious.

    3. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      It may be the worst change, as it redefines one of the main characters of the film, but there are other annoying changes (for example, Han walking across Jabba's back, despite Jabba being the most powerful crime lord in the galaxy and having a bounty on Han's head. Imagine if someone tried that with Michael Corleone in the GodFather.)

      I'd like the original versions, please.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    4. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by PollGuy · · Score: 1

      Well said, sir. Who did Lucas think he was kidding that the whole original trilogy was really all about a brother/sister relationship?

    5. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop insulting Scorpius (Harvey) like that. How dare you!

    6. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      Now, with CG fairies buzzing around him, singing a merry tune throughout the entire film, George Lucas will finally be able to realize his perfect vision of the Han Solo character.

      well, hopefully they won't make him scruffy looking or else one of the lines in the movie won't make any sense at all.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time Han gets in a fire fight, or is otherwise in danger, he will escape only through dumb luck and ingenuity cleverly disguised as incompetence.

      That proves it. Han is just a big rip-off of Mihoshi from Tenchi Muyo!. Lucas even copied those energy swords Tenchi and Ryoko had. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

    8. Re:Wouldn't want send the wrong message by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Han Solo has always been related to Jar Jar Binks

      Will they edit out Ford and replace him with a CG Jar-Jar equivalent as they did with the Hutt?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  39. This way to the egress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You WANT monkeys to fly out of your butt?

    1. Re:This way to the egress. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he wants them to stop, dumbass.

  40. Hey... by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Weren't they already released... a long time ago in a galxy far, far away? Before the dark times, before Jar Jar!

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
    1. Re:Hey... by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      Only on VHS and LaserDisc. I got the VHS original and remastered. Only thing I like with the new one is ditching the funky muppet, lala-ending of the original trilogy.

  41. Re:GET BACK IN MY ASSHOLE YODA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up!

  42. Hong Kong is your friend... by aussersterne · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are bootleg DVDs around, encoded from the widescreen LaserDisc versions of the original trilogy. They're actually quite good, all things considered, and cheap. I got all three for about the price of a light lunch about two years ago.

    Check eBay, look around the 'net. Maybe if "unofficial" sales of the original version outnumber sales of the special edition DVDs, Lucas will develop sense and release the proper, original films.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Hong Kong is your friend... by presearch · · Score: 1

      ...enter the light lunch.

  43. Are we talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the old or the computer Jabba version?

    I personally think the computer Jabba version sucked seriously. Computer Jabba didn't look like puppet Jabba and even Harrison couldn't fix that.

    I would be dissapointed about the computer Jabba version.

  44. GREASED YODA TROLLS WHERE ARE YOU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would have been OT!

  45. Why now? by prozac79 · · Score: 1

    This poses an interesting question... Do you think they will release the super-DVD collection with all 6 movies + extras after Ep. III is released? Will everyone go out and buy the OT and then go out and buy some sort of collector's edition when and if it's available? How many copies of Star Wars can you have: Official DVD, bootleg DVD, collector's edition DVD, VHS, LaserDisc? I'm tired of buying the same movie over and over again out of fear that I will be missing a window of oportunity to ever own it at all.

    --
    "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
  46. That's easy. by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He was waiting until he had enough of Episodes 1 - 3 done so he could rework the real originals to correct all of the errors in the historical continuity he brought in with Episodes 1 - 3.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:That's easy. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, he probably putting more work into modifying the original movies than he actually put into making the originals.

      It's a shame he keeps trying to improve the original trilogy while completely screwing up on the new one.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:That's easy. by 3263827 · · Score: 1

      Fix your sig. The plural of virus is viruses, NOT virii...

    3. Re:That's easy. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I never said it was. Read it again.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:That's easy. by trotski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The plural for radius IS radii

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    5. Re:That's easy. by discogravy · · Score: 1
      It's a shame he keeps trying to improve the original trilogy while completely screwing up on the new one.

      no, that's not a shame. that's par for the course -- the movies that come after the fame and fortune always suck more than the i-sold-my-blood-to-buy-the-film-stock originals.

      What is a shame is that he's killing a lot of the fond memories that fans have of the originals by making the prequels SUCK ASS and i fear he's going to kill the originals with too much tinkering.

    6. Re:That's easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but not radiii (that'll be 3 eyed rad)

    7. Re:That's easy. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      That's my point.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:That's easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lame point. People who say "virii" know that it's not the correct plural. It's an element of geek humor to misuse plurals in order to mock the seemingly arbitrary nature of English language rules. We say virii and boxen because we find it mildly amusing. It's sort of like using 1337 when doing so is not really 4pr0Pr14+3. If you feel compelled to correct us, you are just identifying yourself as somebody who Just Doesn't Get It.

    9. Re:That's easy. by Shenkerian · · Score: 2, Funny
      I just did. 'or' should be 'of'.

      Aside from that, though, nice.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    10. Re:That's easy. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ouch! I've had that for months and you're the first person to catch it, including me!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  47. But.... by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

    But when are they going to release the Star Wars Holidy Special on DVD??

    1. Re:But.... by Pastor+Fluff · · Score: 1
      Fight the Frizzies!!!

      Film at 11.

      --
      Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... can't we just go to Starbuck's for coffee?
    2. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I have to say is that if Lucasfilm was smart, they would release a huge DVD box set containg the following:

      1. Original Trilogy untouched
      2. Original Trilogy SE
      3. Prequel Trilogy
      4. All behind the scenes footage, outakes, and other material previously and not previously released. Whatever is sitting in the vaults should be in the box.
      4. CD/DVD-A/SACD discs containing the entire soundtrack library. Again this includes everything in the library regardless of whether it was previously released or not.

      Then, a year or so later, Lucasfilm should release a suplementary box set containing all the spin-off material from Star Wars. This would include:
      1. Holiday Special
      2. Ewoks cartoon
      3. Droids cartoon
      4. Clone Wars cartoon
      5. All the Ewok movies
      6. Any other spin-off endorsed by lucasfilm.

      And if they REALLY want to milk it they could include a selection of the best/highest rated fanfilms... turn it into a community event on starwars.com to select the top 10-20 fan films to include.

      I would easily pay ~$250 for the first box set and I don't think I'm alone. The second could probably sell for $100-150 without too much trouble as well.

  48. *Original* or Original? by Alcimedes · · Score: 1

    but is it going to be the one where Han shoots first, and we see Jabba the Hutt, or is it going to be the actual original?

    i don't know that i want the stupid redited 20 years later versions. it's probably stupid but i want to watch the movies the way i remember them, not the way they were remade.

  49. Great...now I can buy the same movies again by Inebrius · · Score: 1

    Sure, they are in a different format. Sure, they might be cleaner and with better sound. But many of us have already purchased these only to have to purchase them again at full retail. And then we will have to purchase them again when they are released on HD-DVD. And then we will need to purchase them again when the collectors edition HD-DVD set comes out. And don't forget about the HD-DVD directors edition Episodes 1-6 boxed set. While I am a Star Wars fan, I find it hard to get excited about this when so much money is being made selling the same material over and over.

  50. or Malaysia by WiseWeasel · · Score: 3, Informative

    I got the set from dvdmoviebox.com, Fed-Exed from Malaysia for about $30. Unfortunately, the quality isn't so hot, definitely not your standard DVD quality. There does appear to be surround sound, however, the image is interlaced, and the transfer and encoding are less than professional grade. They arrived in a flat document mailer, with the DVD sleeves and discs in a flat plastic sleeve, so you'll have to get your own DVD case. The image format is 4x3 letterboxed. The region is 0 (region free), and there is no CSS encryption (a sign of quality). In short, you get what you pay for, but I'll probably have to get the official set when that's released, just for the full DVD resolution and progressive image quality.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    1. Re:or Malaysia by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are many different pirated versions. The best one is available for free over USENET or P2P, and has very nice cover artwork as an optional download.

      Piracy isn't nice--but for people who want the un-fucked-around-with versions of classics, it can be a necessity. The *original* SW trilogy will probably never make it to official DVD. Politically incorrect films and cartoons that we remember from our youth (*Song of the South*, some WW2 era cartoons including some classic Bugs Bunny, even some "too violent" now-edited Tom & Jerry and others) will likely never make it to DVD. Many TV shows are also never making it to DVD in their full and original versions due to music licensing issues and RIAA greed.

      It seems like the content industry promotes piracy by not just offering to sell us what we want, at equitable market rates.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    2. Re:or Malaysia by buzzcutbuddha · · Score: 1

      some WW2 era cartoons including some classic Bugs Bunny...will likely never make it to DVD

      oh, wrong you are my friend:
      Warner Bros. are releasing the Looney Toons on DVD in their original form and uncut. Trust me I was shocked, but I am pleased that WB sacked up and is releasing these.

    3. Re:or Malaysia by iluvpr0n · · Score: 1

      Are they releasing Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips? Oh...Thought not.

    4. Re:or Malaysia by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 1

      I'd be very surprised if that set includes, completely uncut, all of the WWII era Looney Tunes, including "Nip the Nips," "Herr meets Hare," "A Coy Decoy," "Southern Firend Rabbit," and "Fresh Hare." If they're included, don't be surprised if they contain edits...

      Maybe they'll be there complete and uncut, but it's highly questionable. Believe me I'd like it if they were all there. :-)

      And of course there are other cartoons that are even less likely to ever be released again--like the Merrie Melodies "Coal Black an de Sebben Dwarfs", "Confederate Honey," etc.

      Meanwhile, a Disney archivist has stated that there's been some discussion of releasing *Song of the South* with commentary and packaging reflecting its historical context, but that there are no solid plans to ever do so. *Fantasia* will almost surely never be released in its original format, with the black centaurs intact. *Saludos Amigos* is also unlikely to be released sans editing, and the re-editing of *Who Framed Roger Rabbit* to make the baby's hand not go as far up the woman's dress is one well-known cut among many.

      The *Tom & Jerry* cartoons were recut for their only DVD releases so far to remove some of the violence--inexplicably, since the entire series is cartoon violence. The originals *are* available in an old (and expensive on eBay) laserdisc boxed set, which may end up being the closest some of the uncut versions will get to DVD.

      I just wish companies would respect us enough to release original versions, at least as "seamless branching" options such that when the kids put in the DVD of a movie or cartoon and hit play they'd get the edited version, but adults can go into the extras menu and enable the full version. That seems very reasonable to me.

      Lucas ought to do the same with the original Star Wars trilogy--make the original cuts available as an option. But it isn't going to happen because he's too damned stubborn.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    5. Re:or Malaysia by Shagg · · Score: 1

      There does appear to be surround sound, however, the image is interlaced ... but I'll probably have to get the official set when that's released, just for the full DVD resolution and progressive image quality

      This is a minor point, but FYI all DVDs are interlaced. The NTSC standard is 480i.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    6. Re:or Malaysia by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      That can't be right . . . how come some of them display as interlaced and others as progressive when played on a computer monitor or HDTV? NTSC can be either progressive or interlaced, but most video is interlaced, as it will be watched on SD interlaced TV sets. Many DVDs, however, are progressive, and do not display the artifacting of interlaced high-motion scenes when played on a progressive display. This SW set, however, does show that artifacting on progressive displays.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    7. Re:or Malaysia by Shagg · · Score: 1

      It depends on the player you are using. "Progressive scan" DVD players will read the interlaced video data off of the DVD and convert it to a progressive video before sending it to a HDTV. I'm sure there are software equivalents for doing the conversion on computer DVD players. The actual data on the DVD is still interlaced though.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  51. Episode III by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    ... and Episode III will not be one tenth as cool as The Matrix Revolutions. Sorry, George. You blew it the second time around. If only you could have realized that while you are a visionary and perhaps even a decent writer, you are a lousy director.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Episode III by TCaM · · Score: 1

      As bad as the prequels have been I can't imagine anything more stupid than the matrix movies.

      Matrix fanatics are right up there on the list with anime freaks on the 'hopelessly homo scale'

    2. Re:Episode III by DeltaSigma · · Score: 2

      Ah, but at least we have one good movie. (bye bye Karma, I'll miss you)

    3. Re:Episode III by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call them stupid, but I also acknowledge they are fluff entertainment... just like Star Wars/ Just with 10 times better SFX, action, and acting (and that's saying a lot because the acting in the Matrix movies isn't very good at all).

      I agree with you about "fanatics", but there's nothing wrong with watching a movie and really liking it. It's just like music... I can listen to and appreciate the most complex and sophisticated music there is, and yet I still like the Surf Punks. I guess I'm just not a snob.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Episode III by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Empire :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Episode III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the plural of virus is in fact viruses, not virii. And the plural of radius is indeed radii. Please update your sig. Thanks.

  52. Make That vcdmoviebox.com by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    It seems the dvdmoviebox.com address isn't working at the moment, hewever, you can use vcdmoviebox.com as well, and that seems to be working.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    1. Re:Make That vcdmoviebox.com by aussersterne · · Score: 1

      Note, too, that there are both VCD and DVD versions floating around... If you can, definitely be sure to get the DVD version, as the encoding is different (VCD being much worse). :-)

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  53. Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1, Funny

    From the article:

    the final battle takes place on a lava planet, and at one point the two are hoping back and forth on hovercrafts floating over the lava.

    Coming soon to a theater near you, STAR WARS: EPISODE III "LETHAL LAVA LAND"

    1. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jedi are invunerable to heat then?

    2. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      I must know, do they release the draw bridge to make the monster fall into the lava so they can rescue princess toadstool? I can't bare to wait for it to show up in theaters!

    3. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that George Lucas was inspired by Penny Arcade...

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    4. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Until obi-wan picks up a flower, enabling him to shoot anakin, and he falls into the lava hence becoming mr vader.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by Ginga_Ninja · · Score: 1

      Surely we bend over and he f*cks... oh never mind... Guess we never covered that in Biology class either

      --
      the future's bright, the future's ginger
    6. Re:Lucas bends us over and f*cks us again by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      I've known that Darth Vader falls into lava during a fight with Obi-Wan since 1977. Even then there was quite a bit of additional mythology around the film.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  54. Re:*Original* or Original? Extra Crispy! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Lucas has stated that there will never, EVAR, be a new release of the 'original' Star Wars films - only the 'Special Editions.' Sorry.

  55. Already there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can already do that with the original Laser Disc versions, from the eDonkey network. (Use eMule if you're running Windows. xMule or lMule for Linux... paste under Direct Download.)

    ed2k://|file|Star.Wars.4.-.A.New.Hope.(CD1).avi| 72 9692160|640583BCA0C48B8D7607601BD4D58C60|/
    ed2k:/ /|file|Star.Wars.4.-.A.New.Hope.(CD2).avi|73 5551488|0EAF5C7E1068BA07F390302AE4C93EF8|/
    ed2k:/ /|file|Star.Wars.5.-.The.Empire.Strikes.Back .(CD1).avi|726568960|CCFD1584C3580866AE2C00DC2005A B26|/
    ed2k://|file|Star.Wars.5.-.The.Empire.Strik es.Back .(CD2).avi|736407552|560434B8E5ABACA704EAC4179F61E 640|/
    ed2k://|file|Star.Wars.6.-.Return.Of.The.Je di.(CD1 ).avi|734101504|8C197E7C40F5FCD8780C884C13DF1F05|/
    ed2k://|file|Star.Wars.6.-.Return.Of.The.Jedi.(C D2 ).avi|731854848|83E830324DA74E6CB3DFC60ABD7CFDDE|/
    (Remove the spaces /. inserts!)

    Han shoots first.

  56. Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, this release has three parts of a SIX part series. Does anybody know what a 6-part series is called?

    1. Re:Trilogy? by windside · · Score: 1

      You could call it a hexology, maybe.

      Or if you really wanted to be thorough, you could call it the first six parts of a nine-part series. Thankfully, Lucas has decided not to do the same kind of hatchet job on Episodes 7-9 as is doing on 1-3, but rest assured - they exist.

      Would that make it a nono-ology? I can't remember my prefixes...

      windside
      --

      --
      ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
      Churchill
  57. This is rumor, and should be treated as such. by Dunkelzahn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The source of this is Aint-It-Cool-News, which has been a major source of false rumors since the prequels began to come out.

    Aint-It-Cool-News is the source of such things as the Grando Calrissian rumors... entertaining, and surely a contribution to Star Wars fandom, but hardly a source of definitive reporting.

    I would suggest that the editors do not place such things on the front page until they are confirmed from such places at the Official Site.

    I am taking this story with a grain of salt.

    --
    .
  58. FYI Starwars rap links for those of you who dunno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. I hope it's the *real* original-Fading memories. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I really want to have the originals on DVD so I can remember Star Wars how it originally was."

    And hopefully before all the VHS copies fade to snow.

  60. Re-mastered is official cannon... by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    And the originals are no longer available, nor will they be.

    1. Re:Re-mastered is official cannon... by kzadot · · Score: 0, Troll

      Heh canon. This is Star Wars, its a soap. Its romeo and juliet in space. If there were no explosions it would be a chick flick.

      I have heard canon refer to true sci fi such as Star Trek. But Star Wars will always just be the mainstream watered down attempt at Star Trek. Star Wars never tried to build up a "canon" anywhere near as intricate as the Star Trek saga. Hell 5 movies of cheesy effects. Compare that to 10 movies and 6 tv series.

      Also why are all the geeks whinging that their dvds wont be the original version. Hell they should be whinging about DVDs and their zones and bullshit.

      Its like when I complained to Salmonella Dub that their Cd was copy protected. Their answer was, "buy the vinyl then".

      Same story here geeks. Buy the VHS. The original Star Wars soap opera girls drama wasnt digital you know...

      Or better yet, download it! Thats what I ended up doing with the Salmonella Dub album too, cos I didnt have a vinyl player.

    2. Re:Re-mastered is official cannon... by brownaroo · · Score: 1
      Its like when I complained to Salmonella Dub that their Cd was copy protected. Their answer was, "buy the vinyl then".

      Yeah I almost picked that up till I saw the copy protection, then I flaged

      Heh canon. This is Star Wars, its a soap. Its romeo and juliet in space. If there were no explosions it would be a chick flick.

      Man you talk out your arse, I dont know who you are but I've looked some of you other post and all you do is stirr shit, this is a serious community!

    3. Re:Re-mastered is official cannon... by Tychoma · · Score: 1

      What on earth is a vinyl player?

      --
      Karma: Shitty (mostly due to American moderators)
  61. Please.... by retro128 · · Score: 1

    Please tell me it won't be the special edition...

    --
    -R
    1. Re:Please.... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      God I hope not, but remember the hoopla? "This is 'absolutely' the last time the trilogy will be released in its original form!!!!!"

      I hope for the best, but prepare for the worst...

    2. Re:Please.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the original Theatrical Version on DVD.

      so can you!!

      fen2k@yahoo.com

    3. Re:Please.... by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Seriously. George Lucas is too full of himself to listen to the fans. IMHO, seeing the deleted scenes for the first time was cool, but if you watch them over and over the lame factor is too much to bear.

      One of the best scenes, when Han one-ups Greedo in the bar was completely profaned, as was the I will-now-step-on-the-tail-of-the-intergalactic-gan gster-who-is-trying-to-kill me scene.

      *sigh* I suppose I'm preaching to the choir. With any luck the original will play by default but the DVD will have the option to throw the deleted scenes in using the angle feature for the true masochists among us.

      --
      -R
  62. HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by motardo · · Score: 1

    I hate the stupid edited ones :(

    1. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Okay, sorry, I know I'm supposed to be a geek and all, but I keep hearing this "greedo shot first" and "han shot first" stuff, but I have no idea what people are talking about. Can you enlighten me? What's the debate?

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by smackjer · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know the scene in the Mos Eisley cantina where Han is confronted by Greedo, a bounty hunter? In the original film, Han shot Greedo first, and strolled his cocky ass out of the joint.

      In the Special (as in Olympics) Edition, Greedo shoots first, misses from 2 feet away, and THEN Han kills the sumbitch.

      The problem with Greedo shooting first is that the original version put Han on the edge of good/bad. He changes in the movie to be a great ally to Luke and Leia, but only after some FUD (fear/uncertainty/doubt) experienced by the audience. In the new version, Han loses the bad-guy edge and is a bit less interesting a character.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the Star Wars, Han Solo kills Greedo in the Cantina while Greedo is holding a gun on him (Greedo is a bounty hunter trying to shake down Han for money he owes Jabba the Hut). Han shoots him under the table.

      This is, of course, perfectly in character for a scoundrel and smuggler who has to get by in the criminal underworld -- if he didn't shoot Greedo, he'd have been killed (or worse).

      During the "enhancements" that Lucas made to the movies a few years ago they added in a quick laser blast from Greedo so that he shoots first, because Han Solo is a "hero" who would never shoot someone except in self-defense.

      Not only is it stupid for characterization reasons, it also looks stupid because Greedo has been holding a gun 6 inches away from Han's face for the past few minutes and then misses by about 3 feet when he pulls the trigger.

      It was just a pointless change that represents in a fraction of a second of film everything stupid Lucas has done over the past 20 years to diminish the work that he was once so respected for.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was clear that Han was going to get toasted by Greedo, so Han just toasted him first. Doesn't make him evil, just not very sporting. Either way, that edit Lucas did really was pointless. There were some nice new scenes with the X wings and whatnot, but otherwise Lucas really overdid it. Just like with the last 3 films.

    5. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by CaptBubba · · Score: 1
      In the bar near the begining of Episode IV, after Luke and Obi Wan leave, Han gets stopped at gunpoint by a bounty hunter. The bounty hunter sits Han down and says that Jabba the Hut wants his head, but if Han would give him the same amount as the bounty he would forget he saw him. During this little discussion Han slowly gets his hand to his blaster-pistol thing.

      Here's where things change:
      In the original film, Han simply shoots and kills the bounty hunter.
      In the New Spiffy-Edition films, the bounty hunter fires first (missing from five feet away) and Han fires back in self defense.

      While this makes Han a "nice guy" because he doesn't kill anyone unprovoked, it doesn't really make sense. #1: Why would a bounty hunter kill his bounty, and therefor lose out on collecting any money? #2: What caused the idiot to miss from across the table? #3: What does this change add to the film?

      Basically people harp on this because it is a pointless and not well thought out change where no change was needed, which most people feel applies to all the changes in the Spiffy-Edition.

    6. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by motardo · · Score: 2, Informative

      www.originaltrilogy.com has a nice explanation, and a petition

    7. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Angstroem · · Score: 1

      Agreed... But I'd also like to hear the X-wing fighter pilots talk using SSB radio; that was already redubbed in later versions of the OV.

      Maybe it's time to transfer those LDs to something more handy.

    8. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      At least he shot him with the blaster-pistol thing and not a walkie-talkie.

      Swi
      --
      Load Clear

    9. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2ft, 3ft, 5ft. any advance on 5 ft?

    10. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Porktastic · · Score: 1

      Interesting to see the discussion about Greedo shooting first. Anyone reading that has the Raiders of the Lost Ark DVD box set? My initial thought when I saw it was that Lucas/Spielberg edited the storyline, making the guy with the giant sword throw it at Han, er, Indy, miss by a mile, and THEN Indy blasts him. Please tell me they didn't change that. Thank you.

    11. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Happily they didn't.

      On my R1 copy the only changes are:

      - remixed sound to 5.1
      - cleaned up print
      - removed certain glaring visual mistakes (like the snake's reflection in the Well of Souls)
      - reinserted a scene cut from the UK version of Temple of Doom where Mola Ram removes the heart of a man about to be sacrificed. How that got a PG I'll never know.

      In short its basically my ideal of a DVD - cleaned up but not fucked with. I'm better Lucas had to be kept at bay with a big stick or something :)

    12. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by tarnin · · Score: 1

      Nope, Indy just blasts away at that guy after he gives his "impressive" sword display. That was, thankfully, not tampered with.

    13. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1
      I was surprised Lucas didn't edit the basket chase scene on the Raiders of the Lost Ark DVD so that the swordsman shoots first.

      I can just picture it:

      Indy finds himself in the middle of a crowded market square, searching frantically for a sign of the thugs carrying Marion off.

      The crowd disperses except for a single man, standing there twirling a sword (digitally converted to a gun) in an impressive display of talent. Suddenly the sword(now gun)man fires at Indy, but Indy (in a really bad Photoshop kind of edit) dodges the bullet and returns fire, killing the sword(now gun)man in self-defense.

      Children around the world cheer the new "family-oriented" Indiana Jones on his happy fun quest to search for the Lost Ark that is is being held by the evil(now friendly and cuddly) Nazis(now Ewoks).

    14. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's especially annoying is that the original version was a justifiable shooting in every state in the Union. A criminal points a gun at you and verbally threatens your life? That counts as deadly force. You blast him, tell the officer "I was in fear for my life," and go home a free man.

      Though it doesn't work that way in England anymore, I've heard, which confirms my long-held suspicion that Lucas is a damn Tory.

    15. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by li99sh79 · · Score: 1
      While this makes Han a "nice guy" because he doesn't kill anyone unprovoked, it doesn't really make sense. #1: Why would a bounty hunter kill his bounty, and therefor lose out on collecting any money?

      Wanted: Dead or Alive man, dead or alive.

      -sam

      --
      I was just here, where did I go?
    16. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Lucas has said that the "enhanced" version is closer to his original vision of the story. If that's true, then why did Han shoot first in the original version? I might understand some of the alterations (SFX of the time weren't advanced enough etc.) but there was NO reason why Lucas couldn't have made Han shoot first in the original version. It just seems to me that Lucas feels the need to make SW even more PC.

      Fuck him

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    17. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by operagost · · Score: 1
      The funny part about that scene is, originally, Indy was supposed to engage in a sword fight with the crazy guy. However, he was suffering from some kind of stomach bug and not in the best mood, so he decided to shoot the guy with his prop gun during rehearsal or one of the takes. It was funny, so they decided to have Ford do it that way.

      As usual, this is only hearsay, could be total crap (no pun intended).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    18. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by *weasel · · Score: 1

      No, Indy still shoots first.

      But there's always the ill-advised walkie talkies change for the rerelease of ET.

      though i understand the DVD allows you to specify whether you want the movie 'enhanced' or not.

      South Park had an appropriate episode regarding all of this.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    19. Re:HAN SHOT FIRST!!! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Yes.. there was an elaborate, choreographed fight sequence with Indy and his whip versus the swordsmaster, but Ford was suffering from dysentery (sp?) so he suggested just shooting the guy... and thus a classic movie gem was born :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  63. A very good explanation as to why that won't work. by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I could go on about how the special edition had so many little changes that it's impossible to squeeze both versions onto a disc with seamless branching, but honestly I don't think that there were that many extensive changes, and some of them might not be very noticable (like cleaning up some of the special effects -- it's not a drastic change, so why have two shots?), so that's not what I think the issue is.

    Lucas is so arrogant and egotistical that he will never admit that there are Star Wars fans who prefer the movies as they were presented originally. As such, he sees no need to ever release the original trilogy in their original format, ever. There's no demand in his mind, because his ego won't let him see that a lot of the people don't like the changes.

  64. Takes me back by maccw · · Score: 1

    There was a guy at my junior high school 78' who's father had a bootleg video of Star Wars. A really good quality one. We watched it everyday for months.

    --
    My karma is getting better everyday.
  65. Starwars sends the wrong message, I'm afraid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's overlook the racism and the poor acting, for a moment. (True fans are busy awaiting Episode2 and aren't still making excuses for TPM.) On a much deeper level, StarWars sends a shocking, frightening, and sickening message to America's youth. StarWars portrays space as a site of warfare between different species and even between rival human factions. When A New Hope was released to theaters thirteen years ago, America was at peace. The Vietnam War had recently been brought to a close, and Americans were looking forward to a new era of prosperity and at friendly relations with their neighbors. But within a few short years, America invaded Grenada, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq, and Haiti. What had happened? What had become of our message of peace? What could have transpired in the interim to bring about this cruel turn of events? I'll tell you what: StarWars was released to thronging masses of American youths. In their orgiastic rush to imbibe their new-found cultural icons, they discarded all the wisdom we had acquired through the blood and sweat of our recent military conquests. It's no surprise, of course. Even the name "StarWars" itself conveys a message of conflict and carnage. A New Hope is, at bottom, a story about armed rebellion by rabble against a benevolent legal order, precisely the sort of communistic message we had come so close to defeating in Vietnam. Perhaps it would've been different if we had won the Vietnam War. Perhaps then we would've witnessed the fall and destruction of communism and all its bastard progeny (socialism, yuppyism, the Home Shopping Network, etc.). Unfortunately, the world will never know. George Lucas, I think I can speak for everyone here on slashdot, and indeed with the entire breath of humanity: you should be ashamed of yourself for what you have wrought. Disgraceful.

  66. September? by bmantz65 · · Score: 1

    Why not in May 05 and just have half of the USA's GNP that month come from Star Wars related sales..

  67. Oh, PLEASE. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look. There are a LOT of people registered on slashdot. On this particular issue, a few of them line up at one polar extreme, and a few at the other. I realize that waaaay back when you first registered at slashdot, there weren't too many people. It may SEEM to somebody who registered when there were less than 3000 users that everyone posts on every article these days.

    Did it ever occur to you that MAYBE the people posting "yay, woohoo! starwars on DVD! here's my credit card, mr. evil corporation!" are not the same people posting "DOWN WITH TEH MAN, I WILL NEVAR BUY A DVD FAGOT LOLOLOL!!!!!!!!"?

    And that the other 500,000 users who *aren't* in either one of the polar extremes, retarded, or trolling might just not be posting?

    Slashdot is a big enough place to house both a "digital rights action front" AND a "DVD fanclub". You'll all just have to share.

  68. Something to share from GROKLAW--no fp!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. Can't stop the momentum...but I will try anyway by GeneralCern · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a lot of people have no interest in owning the Special Edition, Ultra Edition, or Mega Edition versions of these films (myself included). We want the pure, original Han shoots first, Jabba doesn't slither around, Ewoks sing their dumbass victory song versions. We have no chance of every getting these on DVD if the bullsh!t special editions sell in record numbers.

    So, time for the advice....

    Be patient and vote with your wallet, I know it will be difficult, but we have waited this long already. Send the sales figures for these bastard DVDs to sub-Willow levels. We must send the message that nothing other than the original theatrical versions are acceptable. We have forked over simply too much money for substandard product (see TPM and AOTC). If you give your puppy a milk bone and a pat on the head every time it pisses on your couch, you are gonna to train your puppy to piss on the couch.

    BE STRONG JEDI BROTHERS!

  70. OT? Hmm...What means OT? by bluethundr · · Score: 1

    Hoping, am I that OT stand for "Original Theatrical" . Not for "Odious Trilogy" - aka lame-o Lucas "Greedo shoots first" special edition historical revisionism.

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  71. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally... Episode III will hit DVD in November of 2005.

    And then, it will be over. Done. Fini.

    Rejoice!

  72. I hope they leave out by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    the digital crap they added in many years later.
    I saw the revised editions and I was not at all impressed or pleased with them.

    Leave things alone. I want the original, unedited, as released to the theatre in 1977.

    I do *NOT* like digital effects. They look crappy and they detract from the original work and concept.

    LEAVE IT ALONE!

    If it's without the added scenes, I'll buy it.
    If the digital scenes are added in, I will *NOT* buy it..

    1. Re:I hope they leave out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when I first saw the revised editions.. it sucked but i thought it was kind of cool how they added jabba in that scene where he wasnt before.. but now when i watch it i realize how shitty it looks. It looks so crappy and fake, most video games have better graphics. You can see like behind his eyes (gaps between the eyeball and sockets), he has no texture and is just horrible.. Some fx were cool, like fixing the vaseline blob under the hovercraft.. but the rest was pointless and hopefully they will have both versions on the same dvd (like the T2 extreme edition that has the theatrical version and the uncut version)

    2. Re:I hope they leave out by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I particularly dislike the modified Death Star explosion with its silly halo, and the lame repetitive dialog when Han meets the big slug.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:I hope they leave out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheer up. If they do something you don't want, you can blame it on "teh M$".

  73. Already have mine by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Got them in Vietnam for nothing. Probably fed a few people though as I'm sure I paid more than the natives would, and that's OK with me. Of course I will have to buy the "American" ones next year if only to hear Lucas interviews on how Episodes 1,2,3 were botched. Ahh, at least Return of the King is almost upon us.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Already have mine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the original Theatrical Version on DVD.

      So Can you

      fen2k@yahoo.com

  74. Linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the link . . . Seems to be legit, and they processed my order and sent me my DVDs without incident.

  75. Almost 2 years away? by digerata · · Score: 1
    Its really pathetic when you think how well the Rings and Matrix trilogy turned out when compared to the ass load of time its taking lucas to do 1 film.

    Absolutely pathetic.

    --

    1;
  76. Possible DVD features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    These were listed on the Star Wars Galaxies forums, so take them as you will. The guy who posted 'em swore they were legit, but we all know how that goes.

    Got this off of a site that talks about movies, 411mania.com. I kept in the post the actual site they got their info from. Sounds good...and bad......the endings of Return of the Jedi I'm sure you'll hate now. Anyways, here it is:

    CREDIT: AICN news

    Episode IV: A New Hope

    01. The Imperial March has been added to Darth Vader's first appearance on Princess Leia's ship.
    02. When Obi-Wan is talking to Luke about his father Anakin's Theme plays in the background and then it turns into the Imperial March as he talks about Vader.
    03. The lightsaber effects have been redone and the frame jumps of lightsabers being turned on has been removed.
    04. There's a new scene which has been shot during the filming of Episode III in which the Emperor dissolves the Senate.
    05. In the Cantina, the Duros(green aliens guys) have been replaced with Neimoidians and some aliens from the prequels have been added.
    06. The bleeding arm on the floor in the Cantina has been replaced with a non-bleeding arm because it's now canon that lightsabers cauterize wounds.
    07. The original shooting scene between Han and Greedo has been restored.
    08. Jabba the Hutt has been given a makeover and Han no longer steps on his tale.
    09. In place of R2 wobbling down the stairs to the Falcon's hangar, a CG R2 navigating the stairs like he does in Attack of the Clones was added.
    10. The white boxes around space ships have been removed and new CG shots have been added.
    11. The scene of the Falcon being chased by the two Star Destroyers was modified. The Falcon now does spinning moves, avoiding the Star Destroyers' fire.
    12. When the Death Star destroys Alderaan there's a new scene of Yoda's reaction to the disturbance in the Force that is created by all those deaths and then it cuts to Obi-Wan reacting to it as well.
    13. The Dianoga has gotten a CG makeover and were are now able to see more of the creature.
    14. The Death Star's paneling and computers have been slightly altered to show similar displays to those in the prequels.
    15. The words "Tractor Beam" with Aurebesh lettering.
    16. More stormtroopers have been added to the Death Star.
    17. Temuera Morrison's voice is being recorded for use with all the stormtroopers.
    18. The Obi-Wan/Vader duel has been spruced up. It is much more epic and there is much more movement. A modified version of Duel of the Fates is being considered for the scene.
    19. The Death Star plans that are taken from R2 have been updated. When the Rebels are reviewing the Death Star plans they look similar to the plans we see in Attack of the Clones.
    20. The Death Star battle is much more epic with more Tie Fighters and more Rebels being blown to bits. We get to see old Naboo starfighters being used by the Rebels.
    21. There's a new scene(shot during Episode III) where Darth Vader goes to Coruscant and lands his ship in the same building Count Dooku does at the end of Attack of the Clones. Except now the building is all fixed up and it is now Palpatine's palace. He meets with Palpatine to ask for forgiveness for his failure and inform him of a new potential who is strong in the Force.
    22. Chewbacca now gets a medal.

    Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

    01. The taun-tauns are now CG.
    02. The battle of Hoth is much more epic. We see the Imperial ships land on Hoth and release AT-ATs. The AT-ATs have been sped up a bit. There's a ground battle between the Rebel soldiers and stormtroopers featuring new ships and vehicles.
    03. Temuera Morrison's voice is being recorded for the older Boba Fett and all the stormtroopers.
    04. The white boxes around space ships have been removed.
    05. The slug monster is CG.
    06. Ian McDiarmid has refilmed scenes as the Emperor. The conversations between Vader and Palpatine is now longer and features a few connections to the prequels.
    07. Yoda's face is

    1. Re:Possible DVD features? by reiggin · · Score: 1
      Just before he dies he says, "It is finished...".
      So now Anakin is a Christ-figure? Terrific. Waytago George. You're freakin' Steinbeck now.
    2. Re:Possible DVD features? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

      God, this sounds all too much like Lucas. Either this is legit or it's a brilliant fake.

      07. The original shooting scene between Han and Greedo has been restored.

      Thank Christ.

      13. The Dianoga has gotten a CG makeover and were are now able to see more of the creature.

      I'm assuming this "dianoga" is the creature in the trash compactor. What is wrong with Lucas? Most of what made that scene so effective was that you *couldn't* see more of it!

      01. The taun-tauns are now CG.

      Why? They looked fine! I'm not convinced that their gait with CG will look any better than the stop-motion.

      05. The slug monster is CG

      Again, why? Why?

      08. A new scene was shot in which the stormtroopers, after they capture Han, Leia and Chewie, bring Vader the box containing C-3PO in pieces. Vader orders the stormtroopers to bring the broken droid to Chewbacca's cell so that he can fix him.

      Oh sure. I can easily see one of the most evil dudes in the galaxy making sure that C-3PO gets back to his friends. Christ.

      04. The ewoks are now mostly CG and there are a lot more of them.

      Oh dear lord.

      07. In the battle of Endor there are thousands of Ewoks and they are more vicious than there midgets-in-suits counterparts. More bite the dust now.

      That's small consulation.

      11. During Anakin's death scene it starts with a sad rendition of the Imperial March and slowly evolves into Anakin's Theme.

      Oh now this is just too much. Having the Imperial March play one last time during Vader's death was a stroke of brilliance by John Williams. I can't believe they are going to fuck with this.

      12. Sebastion Shaw who played Anakin when he was unmasked has been replaced with Hayden Christenson in make-up to make him look older. Anakin has much more dialogue. He apologizes for the destruction he caused, he thanks his son for turning him back to the light, he tells his son to rebuild the Jedi and he says he loves him and his sister. Just before he dies he says, "It is finished...".

      Nice. So they're going to nullify this Shaw dudes single greatest professional achievement. Really nice George.

      I could go on and on but what's the point? Lucas doesn't give a shit.

      GMD

    3. Re:Possible DVD features? by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Oh sure. I can easily see one of the most evil dudes in the galaxy making sure that C-3PO gets back to his friends.

      Vader MADE Threepio. It's only natural that he would preserve his creation, as any parent would.

    4. Re:Possible DVD features? by sirshannon · · Score: 1

      the Taun-Tauns looked fine!?!? You are BLIND? The Taun-Taun dying in the snow was the single worst effect in the Star Wars canon. Period.

    5. Re:Possible DVD features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Evil hath no emotions.

      2. Touchy feely elements only appeal to "awww"-going idiots.

      Still don't get it? This is where "The Lord of The Rings" separates from the rest of Hollywood.

    6. Re:Possible DVD features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "12. Sebastion Shaw who played Anakin when he was unmasked has been replaced with Hayden Christenson in make-up to make him look older. "

      Lucas just won't be happy until he gan get Dave Prowse legally removed from the credits.

      Scumbag.

    7. Re:Possible DVD features? by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 1
      So now Anakin is a Christ-figure? Terrific. Waytago George. You're freakin' Steinbeck now.
      Uhhh... "now?" In Episode I, Anakin is seen as the fulfillment of a prophecy of one who will "bring balance to the Force" (forgive me if I have gotten the quote wrong; I only watched Episode I once and don't intend to watch it again...), and we learn that Anakin is the result of a virgin birth, having been created somehow by the Force (technically, the chlamydians or whatever they're called). It seems to me that as soon as we started to get to know Anakin, he was already a "Christ Figure."

      --Mark
      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    8. Re:Possible DVD features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Executive Summary: CG instead of puppets, more ewoks, more jar jar, more compatibility, less originality.

    9. Re:Possible DVD features? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT YHL HAND

    10. Re:Possible DVD features? by NihilSmurf · · Score: 1

      I think this list is fake, because too many items involve adding more death and carnage, which is not at all the direction Lucas has been moving. I think it is more of a wishlist.

    11. Re:Possible DVD features? by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1
      It is apparent that Lucas is incapable of leaving well enough alone. If he makes any of these changes, I hope he will at least put the original theatrical release versions (with all of the original 1977-1983 era special effects) on the DVDs as well as the new "improved" versions. The only two things in the list of rumored changes that I approve of are:
      • Restoring the original scene where Han shoots Greedo.
      • Giving Chewie a medal at the endo of ANH (I thought he got one in the original version, but he should have if he didn't).
      The changes in the list that horrify me completely:
      • More ewoks...even if they aren't little kids and midgets in fuzzy costumes anymore.
      • JarJar Binks in RotJ.
      • Replacing Sebastian Shaw with Hayden Chistensen in RotJ.
      • Messing with the lighsaber duel between Obi Wan and Vader.
      • Naboo fighters in the Death Star battle in ANH.
      • Messing with the original score. However Duel of the Fates is indeed a brilliant piece, and John Williams is a genius, so I will reserve judgment until I hear the changes.
    12. Re:Possible DVD features? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I always thought Obi Wan vs Vader was pretty weak.. instead of two legendary masters, it looked like two seniors trying to remember how to have sex or something. I wouldn't mind if they made it a bit more kinetic... just as long as they keep it elegant and don't overdo it. I don't want to see Obi Wan turned into a wall-bouncing muppet ;)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    13. Re:Possible DVD features? by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      Evil hath no emotions? Evil is all about our emotions getting out of hand. What leads someone to the dark side (since this is a Star Wars thread)? Fear and anger. Those sound like emotions to me.

    14. Re:Possible DVD features? by reiggin · · Score: 1

      Good point. Been so long since I've seen Ep. I that'd I'd forgotten Lucas' first misuse of this literary techinique. Poor guy thinks that such things will actually earn him respect again. I got news: It's too late.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. YOU AGAIN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Always with the hurting! I don't care if you're momma doesn't love you! NO MORE POSTING FOR YOU!!!!

  79. Thank you! by tchdab1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is important information that all of us need, and I for one wish to thank you for providing it in a timely manner.

    And don't for a minute think I'm joking.

  80. Got any reviews for that set? by bogie · · Score: 1

    There is precious little info for that box set. It says DVD and THX, but zero about where it was mastered from. You say LD, but I can't find out any info and the site it very sparse. For all I know its just the VHS tape with the audio redubbed. I'd be mightly pissed if that was the case if I bought it.

    Got any link to reviews of that set from people who actually bought it and how the quality is etc?

    Thanks.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  81. Finally, Lucas has done something right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope he doesn't include that stupid scream as Luke Skywalker leaps off the platform in Cloud City.

  82. better not screw up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If lucas fucks up vader in episode three i swear to god im going to jump in my car, drive to skywalker ranch and beat the living be-jesus out of him personally.

    The company should be smart enough now to know what lucas does to an otherwise good movie concept.

  83. God I hope you're wrong. by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    I can see that you're right... I just don't want to.

    I so very want the Restored-but-non-cgi-messed with versions... so very, very badly... I horridly have them on VHS (well, my wife does), and we have the Special editions on the official VCDs (Hey... they're an oddity at least. :) )

    But how I want to be able to watch Star Wars with NO CGI JABBA, no CGI walking slugs with pencil leg things, NONE of that crud... just give me the original version nicely cleaned up so it looks like it did when it was released... you did that... you cleaned them up, you polished the soundtracks... now leave them be...

    leave them be.

  84. Only Edited Versions to Appear on DVD? by prell · · Score: 1

    A while back I remember reading an article that stated that the Star Wars DVDs will only feature edited versions of the originals, which include extra dialogue and special effects. Most troubling was the inclusion of scenes specifically tailored to make the originals fit better with the new (old) movies. Specifically, I believe some scenes were said to include Amidala.

    I do not know if this is still true (or if it was even more than a rumor then, though I do believe George Lucas himself lent credence to it, stating that these edited versions of the original trilogy would be the only versions released on DVD), but if it is, it might be enough to spoil the movies altogether, for me. And even if these new edits are not included, what about the old edits that were included in the re-release of the original trilogy? I wasn't necessarily a fan of those; to have those included as extras ("redone" scenes), would be appropriate, in my mind.

  85. Yes, But With This Important Difference ... by bettiwettiwoo · · Score: 1
    You mean kind of like LOTR Director Peter Jackson carrying around his own personal video camera during filming specifically for the DVD Extras??
    Yes, exactly like that. But with this important difference: that compared to the Star Wars prequels, a private home video of PEter Jackson's toenails would appear interesting and full of character development.

    PErsonally, I strongly feel that when it comes to the Star Wars prequels, the phrase 'outtakes' should have been applied, and appropriate measures carried out, to everything coming between the titel and the end credits.
    --
    The liver is evil and must be punished.
  86. Now I can show my kids... by AvantLegion · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... that Star Wars hasn't always sucked.

  87. Lucasloco by fleener · · Score: 1

    > Have people forgotten how George Lucas works?

    I just don't buy media anymore. The artist organizations disgust me and individual money-grubbing artists sicken me. There's a difference between making a handsome profit off an exquisite piece of art, and sucking the life out of it by pimping it for every dollar possible.

    1. Re:Lucasloco by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      Im with you.. I dont buy any media (outside of respected news-magazines like macleans for instance -- i see lots of live bands and theater. Live Performance is a much better experience -- and I feel like my $ may actually reach the artists a little 'better'.

  88. These aren't the discs you're looking for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new here. Move along. Besides, I already have them on disc.

    Original cut, boxed set, THX. Quite beautiful. Actually I've had them for almost the last 10 years.

  89. NON SE DVD OT - I have! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    email me!!

    fen2k@yahoo.com

  90. SW misquotes by QEDog · · Score: 3, Funny
    You know... maybe, just maybe, Lucas & co. should spend more time telling a coherent story with believable characters, and less time worrying about how he'll look in the outtakes?

    George Solo: Coherent story and believable character are no match for a good Bonus DVD at your side, kid.

    New Fan: How did the original trilogy die?
    Oldi-Fan: An old director, who was a pupil of mine until he turned to evil, helped the Empire edit and destroy the original trilogy. He betrayed and murdered your trilogy.

    Darth Lucas: The ability to write SW-OT is insignificant next to the suckiness of the New Trilogy

    Fan: What a piece of junk!
    George Solo: She'll make point five past a gazillion dollars. She may not look like much but she's got it where it counts, kid. I've made a lot of special CG modifications myself.

    SWFAN-3PO: We seem to be made to suffer. It's our lot in life.

    Fan: Never. I'll never like the new trilogy. You've failed, your highness. I am a true fan, like my father before me.
    Emperor Lucastine: So be it... fan.



    I love SW... I just hate the terrible scripts of Epi1 and Epi2.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
  91. I have the OT NON -SE on DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the original Theatrical Version on DVD.

    Email me
    fen2k@yahoo.com

    these are new.. from usa :)

  92. I have the original Theatrical Version on DVD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have the original Theatrical Version on DVD.

    Email me

    fen2k@yahoo.com :)

  93. Why? by sjlutz · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm as much as a geek as the rest, and I liked StarWars.. But I'm not buying the DVD, never. Why? Lucas doesn't deserve my money anymore. Not counting the latest (earliest) installments of Ep IV and V.. Lucas held out for too long on making these DVDs. Had he made them.. say 5 years ago, I would have bought, now, I realized that a) I can live without them, and b) Lucas just wants as much as my money as possible, without doing anything more to earn it.

  94. Please Help The Slave Kids and Whiny Teenagers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you hate it when the aliens keep killing your mom, because you couldn't stop them? Tired of people making you their slave? Poor acting skills? Not anymore. JEDIXXX can turn any slave kid, or any whiny teenager into a bad@$$ jedi-killing machine. Our labs have wanked^H^H^H^H^Horked long and hard on a formula containing midichlorians that can turn even the most clumsy klutz into a Jedi knight. Accept no imitations. This is the real Jango Fett. Here are some satisfied consumers:

    "Small I was. Weak I was. Planes now I lift. Light sabers I wield. JEDIXXX eat. Then and only then, a Jedi, you will be" -- Yoda Da Man

    "I used to go by the book, but now I'm one bad muthu$%#@3r thanks to JEDIXXX" -- Samwise L. Jackson

    "Meesa talked-a just-a like this-a until I ate some JEDIXXX" -- Jar Jar Binks-a

    "Without JEDIXXX, I never would have been able to kill flies with chopsticks, heal people by rubbing my hands together, or beat the crap out of whiny teenagers who tormented my students." -- Mr. Miyagi

    "I was just a lucky race-pod racing slave of a kid, and a whiny arrogant teenager, who couldn't stop the aliens from killing my mom, and only got married when a queen pitied me for my poor acting skills. Then I ate JEDIXXX, and I became a bad@$$ mechanical jedi-killing machine. And a father. It's true. JEDIXXX makes sense." -- Anakin Skywalker

    Unfortunately JEDIXXX still has to be completely tested to be available for public consumption. Before you dismiss completely the possibility of sending a donation, think of that 1 slave kid, or 1 arrogant whiny teenager that you know. Ask yourself whether there is any reason to believe that he or she couldn't possibly become a bad@$$ jedi. Forget them. Those are not reasons. Please send all donations to emperorpalpatine@NOSPAMjedicreation.com .

    Sincerely,
    Emperor Palpatine
    Director
    JEDI Creation, Inc.

  95. The Making Of... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought I remembered quite a bit of info on various "making-of" shows that showed the original models, how they did cutting-edge special effects on a shoestring budget, and the occasional flaws that made it through (like a TIE fighter shadow where the fighter itself had been removed).

    I remember watching those when I was a kid. The one on The Empire Strikes Back clearly sticks out in my mind. I was about 11 or 12 then and this was the first time I had ever gotten a chance to see movie magic in the making. I remember being stunned at the painstaking process of stop-motion animation that was used to animate the AT-ATs. The fact that they actually built a full-scale X-wing fighter that was lifted by a crane to simulate Yoda lifting the fighter out of the Degoba swamp. The Degoba sound stage, incidently, was the largest indoor stage in the world at that time. The rebel fighters who formed the ground forces on Hoth were actually Norwegian (or Scandanavian) people who didn't understand a lot of the english instructions being called out by the director.

    I also remember fondly The Making of Return of the Jedi. They showed how some poor linguist sap had to don a giant Admiral Ackbar arm puppet and control his lips to match the sounds without being able to see Ackbar's mouth! I could go on and on. Those shows were great!

    Does anyone have any idea how I can get copies of these? If there was any legal way of obtaining them, I'd gladly pay for them. However, as with so many things these days, they have disappeared into the ether because of the neglect of the copyright owners so I assume that I will have to rely on bootlegs. Please, any help would be appreciated.

    And, oh yeah, what the fuck is wrong with you Lucas? What are you trying to pull with this "there aren't a lot of behind-the-scenes materials available for the original films" bullshit? Christ, at least you could have said that whatever stuff you did have all rotted because of failure to preserve it. To say there weren't a lot of behind-the-scenes materials shot is an obvious lie.

    GMD

    1. Re:The Making Of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *love* the link to the jedimaster site! laughing out loud watching those clips, and amazed at what some people have been able to do...

  96. Thanks for the heads up by bogie · · Score: 1

    I saw the link the AC left to it in another thread and I was actually considering ordering it. Too bad the quality is no good, but I'm glad that I didn't waste my money on it.

    Yea the "remastered editions" will have some stupid crap added to them, but at least the picture and sound will be superb.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  97. Petition Online For Original Trilogy by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a petition online to try and gain mass support to get the oringinal trilogy published on DVD. They have almost 45,000 digital signatures. Let's slashdot that number up to 100k.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  98. A question by inkswamp · · Score: 0, Troll
    Why does Slashdot post Star Wars stories when there are no Star Wars fans around here? All I see are a bunch of whiners bellyaching about how some esoteric aspect of the movies has been tweaked and how that somehow portends the entirety of human civilization as we know it coming to screeching halt.

    Just wondering.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:A question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does Slashdot post Star Wars stories when there are no Star Wars fans around here?

      For the same reason there are anime stories on slashdot. Groups in the geek community really like both topics. Now I don't like Star Wars, but if the rest of the crowd wants to talk about Lucas' movies, more power to them.

    2. Re:A question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude I wish I had mod points cause I'd mod you out of that "troll" rating. Maybe someone else can. I get what youre saying that fans don't sit around bitching all the time -- too much thin-skin around here. I hope whoever modded you that way gets metamodded into the toilet.

    3. Re:A question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. it would be nice to see some star wars discussions when there is a star wars topic posted instead of it becoming a big crybaby fest for people who disagree with changed lucas is making.

  99. George Lucas..... by methangel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is a cock. Why the hell has he waited so long to release the original DVDs of the movies that made him a demi-God to the geeks?

    I know that there was a laser-disc edition released a while-back. Was he waiting for the DVD standard to die??

    George Lucas has really made me a sad geek with his last two Starwars episodes. I think for a lot of people when I say that they should never have been made.

    Yes, George Lucas is a cock.

    1. Re:George Lucas..... by Acidangl · · Score: 1

      So he could sell you sepcial edition on VHS, then sell you the special edition on DVD. The best part is that after all of the movies have been out for a while he will have a Super Special Box set. So every Starwars fan will buy 2 to 5 copies of every movie.

      --
      I'm a cucumber
  100. Just finished my set of the ORIGINAL movies. by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    Let's see.. Widescreen edition from EBay for all three films. Captured on a DVD-RAM drive and then authored with menus, chapter points, cover art from the original trilogy VHS set, and a few "special features". They look great, have Pro Logic 2 channel audio that sounds really quite good.

    I'd have to say, I'm happy to have these films on DVD and they look great. Lucas can bite me.

    1. Re:Just finished my set of the ORIGINAL movies. by bogie · · Score: 1

      Mind linking to the person you bought from on ebay?

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:Just finished my set of the ORIGINAL movies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are looking for the DVD's correct? I should have been more specific. My DVD version was created directly from the THX LD version that was I obtained through Ebay. I performed the work to transfer it to DVD.

  101. Screw them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're holding out on the DVD release to pysche people up... not going to happen here. When it comes out, great. But you won't see me jerking off to it - it's a great trilogy, but it isn't so golden as to be dangled like a carrot. Sorry, it's just another good set of movies - and old at that. Dragging out the release date is bullshit - you know it and I know it. So when it does come out, you can bet your ass I'll be burning copies of it just to screw over Lucas a bit for his inflated ego.

    WAKE UP! IT'S NOT THE BIBLE! IT'S A FUCKING MOVIE!

  102. Re:No one cares about Ep 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    HAHA some dumb ass fanboy wasted a mod point.

    Am I the only one to notice how all the troll posts dont get modded down as fast. Maybe its because all the crap they are saying is true.

  103. The REAL question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is The Star Wars Christmas Special coming out on DVD? THAT will signal that the apocalypse is on us...

    I can't wait.

  104. Coupla comments: by freeweed · · Score: 1

    1. Notice how Empire is modified the least. Even Lucas knows which one not to touch too much :)

    2. 03. Yoda is CG. Yoda disappears leaving his clothes behind like Obi-Wan now. Hmm. Yoda always did disappear leaving his clothes behind when he died. Something I'm missing?

    3. I notice some deleted scenes (I assume from 20 years ago) being added. That would rock! Also, if they could clean up the Jabba scene in ANH I'd be pretty happy. When I was a kid the rumor'd "Jabba" footage got shown on TV years after the movie came out, and we all thought it was cool to see how Lucas had been planning this way back when. It was the only good thing to happen to the "new" trilogy, and it'd be nice if it wasn't so awkward when Han walks behind him.

    Of course, this is probably all nonsense, because it looks too good to be true. Some of the re-scoring seems pointless and gratuitous, having that snotnosed Christenson around ruins it, but otherwise, not all that bad considering what he could have done.

    And probably will.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Coupla comments: by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1
      Hmm. Yoda always did disappear leaving his clothes behind when he died. Something I'm missing?
      Actually, he died in bed, under a blanket. The blanket remained, but the clothed Yoda disappeared.
    2. Re:Coupla comments: by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Ahhhhhh.

      I knew something seemed wrong, even as I typed that. But for the life of me I swear I remembered something falling.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Coupla comments: by falsification · · Score: 1

      This brings up an important point. When you go to heaven, are you nude?

  105. this is good news by abolith · · Score: 0
    it is just sad that they are covering the clone wars in a fucking cartoon.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  106. Open letter to George Lucas.... by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

    George,

    It's recently been hinted at that the first three Star Wars movies will soon be released on DVD.

    If they are "Special Edition" only I will not buy them.

    I fondly remember waiting in line after line after line to see the original Star Wars again and again and again. I and others helped it become the phenomenon that it is today.

    We want the film we remember, not the second hand copy of it. It may be your definitive vision but it's not what made the film great to us. The film, and the maker of the film, was human. Human inspired. Human created. Human infused. That's what drew us to the films - it was about _us_ not you. The hero or villain was us not anybody else. Our dreams were wrapped in sand, space, and blades of light.

    *ahem*

    Brass tacks...

    There is one more thing your should note. Sales are going to be down. Not a little - a lot.
    This is because even though you made the movie for you - we made you able to make the movies. Now we're angry because you've changed the movies that we helped you by buying. We'd gladly buy them again if they were the same movies. But they aren't - because you've forgotten that the dreams you create live not only in your heart but in the hearts of others.

    I've said my piece. What you do is up to you but I hope you take to heart the things I've said and remember them when it comes time to maybe allow the "original" non-edited version out on DVD.

    If you want us to pay you to view your dreams you have to enable us to make them our own otherwise what are we paying for?

    Sincerely,

    A concerned Star Wars fan...

    --

    "Bah!" - Dogbert
  107. They will edit the old bonus materials too... by eMartin · · Score: 1

    I have an old behind-the-scenes video about the original Star Wars made before Empire Strikes Back. In it, the actors talk about possiblities for their characters in the upcoming sequels and make it clear that at that point Darth Vader wasn't Luke's father, and there was a chance that there might be a romantic involvement between Luke and Leia (Carrie Fisher wasn't sure whether she prefered Luke or Han).

    So the way I see it, Lucas would have to edit all of that stuff out if he wants people to keep thinking that he had the whole story planned out from the start.

    1. Re:They will edit the old bonus materials too... by nsandver-work · · Score: 1

      So the way I see it, Lucas would have to edit all of that stuff out if he wants people to keep thinking that he had the whole story planned out from the start.

      Anyone who's actually seen the movies should have no illusions that the entire storyline was laid out in advance. :-P

  108. Stormtrooper voices? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    What is this fucking revisionist crap about changing all the stormtrooper voices? Oh wait, this is Lucas we're talking about, but still...

    What's the shelf life on those clones anyway? I'll admit that the idea that "stormtrooper aim" is due to the fact that they're all geriatrics, or that when the original set started to get long in the tooth the copied the copies and thus introduced errors that way, but it doesn't make any real sense.

    I don't really believe that the incompetents we see in the original trilogy can be the same as the competent stormtroopers in the new trilogy. Even accounting for the inevitable deterioration in skill once they "switched" to the bad side (as is mandated in some obscure movie code) they _still_ suck too much to be the same clones.

    The reason the clone army was manufactured the way it was was because they were being developed by a subversive group that needed to keep their activites secret. They paid through the nose both for the secrecy and the quality.

    After that though Palpatine is in charge of the Republic-cum-Empire, and do you think the same person/government who decided the best route to go for military craft was Tie Fighters (noted for being inferior and thereby cheap and easy to replace, thus "explaining" why the Rebels could win against such bad numerical odds) would continue to pay high prices for high quality clones? No! After he was firmly in power he'd get new recruits the way every other despotic government does. Recruiting Joe Average volunteers at best, forced conscriptions at worst.

    Given how many stormtroopers there must be in the galaxy at the time of the original trilogy, and given that the original clones would be about 40 years old relative at least, you'd expect the clones to be few and far between, and the rank and file to be filled with normal people recruited (by whatever means) and trained (however badly) after the Clone War.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Stormtrooper voices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps these newer clones didn't get combat training?

    2. Re:Stormtrooper voices? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "I don't really believe that the incompetents we see in the original trilogy can be the same as the competent stormtroopers in the new trilogy."

      I always laugh in the original trilogy, when Luke and Obi Wan find the destroyed sandcrawler, and Obi Wan says he knows it's the work of the Imperials, because "Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise!", and then throughout the rest of the trilogy they continually prove they couldn't hit a Tatooine sand dune if they were buried in one. :)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  109. Already got them by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    They're shown on TV fairly frequently and I have a DVD recorder. This way I don't need to suffer Lucas splicing Amidala into the "ghosts" final scene of ROTJ, as he's rumored to be doing.

    Having said that, if he could do something (anything) about the Ewoks, the world would be a better place ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Already got them by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

      OMG...please tell me you are not serious about the rumor that he is going to splice Amidala into the end of RotJ! I wouldn't put it past him though. However, removing the Ewoks would be cool! Maybe in a few years he'll do a Special Edition of Episode I where he digitally removes JarJar Binks, Anakin, and Amidala, and in Episode 2 he could digitally replace Anakin with a wooden plank.

  110. Too late, I'm NOT interested anymore! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was one of the people who waited in the LONG!!!
    lines back in the 70's (when very young) to see
    the first film. I've NEVER waited in a line that
    long before, or since, for anything. Not even
    at the USPS (U.S. Postal Service). I wanted these
    on DVD. Bad! I waited, and waited. No DVD's!
    George Lucas didn't want my money when I wanted
    to give it to him, and he made me wait and wait,
    and I decided I was done waiting. I sold my
    Star Wars VHS tapes on eBay (whichever set came
    in the Gold box), and I'm done. Not just with
    SW, but with ANYTHING that SOB does. RotLA? NO!
    AG? NO! Games? NO! Anything new? NO! He can
    kiss my ass. He'll have to build his next mansion
    with some other suckers money. I've moved on.
    There, I feel MUCH better now.

    [POSTED ANONYMOUSLY BECAUSE SOME JACKASS SW FANBOY
    WOULD MOD ME DOWN BECAUSE I DON'T SUCK GL'S COCK!
    SEE, ITS HAPPENED BEFORE AND I'M LEARNING. :^)]

  111. Come on... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 1

    I *knew* people were going to say this when the release date came out. You people want the original trilogy on DVD, but you don't want more than one re-release that you "have to" spend money on. Half the geek world wanted it on DVD, even without special features. But that just meant that there'd be a full featured version later. And then you'd slam him for being a money grubber. I'm a Star Wars fan myself, but FWIW, it's Lucas' story, and you all bought into it. You don't have to buy it.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  112. sounds neat...maybe, but its pretty fucked up. by xSauronx · · Score: 1

    i hope thats a sick joke. may be interesting to see, but i wouldnt pay for it, and i definitely want the orignals on dvd. bleh. ill never be throwing out my tapes of the originals, thats for sure.

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  113. I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I picked it up at DragonCon. And it's the original version, too, not the hacked-up re-release crap.

    The packaging was a little cruder than I expected from LucasArts, though. And some of the subtitles were misspelled. And the DVD was a funny color...

  114. Which set to get... by IPFreely · · Score: 1
    So the original trilogy will be out next year. Then shortly after Ep. III, we'll see a trilogy set of I,II,III. Then shortly after that, we'll see some super mongo 12 disk set with all six plus George's life story and an Ewoks party dance karoke set.

    That is the set I will buy. I can wait. I have patience. And by then, my kids will be old enough to appreciate it.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Which set to get... by bhsurfer · · Score: 1
      Something unfortunate that seemed to happen to me is that my kids (9 & 14) are almost TOO old to dig it. The fact the the only Star Wars movies out on dvd are pretty weak has turned them off to the whole thing. In some way it seems that GL's plan backfired and he lost 2 potential fans by waiting so long and making a few lame movies rather than just putting the stuff out as he had it.

      Who knows though, they may not have liked them anyway, although the oldest one liked the Hitchhiker's Guide so they're not totally immune to the draw of "speculative fiction".

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
  115. Keep fingers crossed... by asdrtyjkl · · Score: 1

    That George wont tweak them any more! Just give un the originals George! Please! We beg of you. We dont want to watch the originals we loved suffer and die while you discus what new changes to make in a commitee!

  116. Re:Divx, horrible by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    Divx was horrible, but I don't think its death could be so described. The death of Divx was a good thing.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  117. DVD Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT'S A TRAP!

  118. Why not wait? by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Would it not be better to what for him to release all six of the movies on DVD... O.k. You'd have to wait an additional few years as well for the "special edition" as well. Oh, well, I'll attempt to avoid this... I foresee a Christmas present though... Arggh. I have the VHS and the SE VHS tapes, DO I really need the DVDs? I'd rather have the B5 Season 3... I've grown to like a plot.

  119. Clone Wars DVD this year?!? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    The animated series of Clone Wars shorts appearing soon on the Cartoon Network will also be released on DVD, possibly before the end of this year.

    This year, or end of 2004? Since the second half of the animated series won't come out on Cartoon Network till March, 2004, I'm assuming that's a typo...

  120. Maybe... by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

    The DVD will have both. When you stick it in the machine you can choose between the original and the new one. Or on another disc. They did that with the Akira DVD i recently bought. I doubt it though but it would be nice.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  121. Laser Disc by chiph · · Score: 1

    Glad to have my Laserdisc, I am.

  122. Lucas can't win. by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    When Lucas releases movies he's a greedy bastard who's millking us. When it DOESN"T release movies he's a greed bastard who's doing a suckey job of milking us. Gimme a break.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  123. Lucas, please include the original release! by Hecubas · · Score: 1

    It's so frustrating to watch Greedo shoot first in the special edition. For what, 20 years, Han has been the character that in Episode IV went from scoundrel to hero.

    I didn't mind all the CG fluff like the droids in Mos Eisley, or the dewbacks. But having Greedo shoot, then Han retaliate changes Han's character considerably. When the audience is first introduced to Han, they were just as uneasy about him as Luke was. Seeing him bust a cap in Greedo's smarmy ass doubled that feeling. Watching him turn into the unlikely hero was just as important as Luke's development. Why change that after 20 years?

    So please Mr. Lucas, use the DVD technology to allow play of the original release. You know, the one that millions saw a long time ago...

    --
    hecubas

    --
    Hecubas
  124. Haloween special by niall2 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone think Lucas will put a digitally enhanced version of the 1977 holiday special, AKA A very Wookie Christmas? Now that would be as good as the extended LOTR disks!!!

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
  125. I'm going to take my vitamins... by Bighph · · Score: 1

    Heros have been flawed for thousands of years, and some time in the 1990's politcal correctness ends this too? I'll keep my VHS and hope for a pre-George Bush version on DVD sometime in my lifetime. Something tells me I better take my vitamins.

  126. That's unfair and inaccurate. by Arkaengel · · Score: 1

    I'm quite fond of cock. I can't say the same about Lucas.

  127. Lucas sucks, and yet.... by Chibi · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I wish he put these out in a more timely manner, but his official reason is that he didn't have the time to spend on them that he wanted. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt for a second...

    I remember back when the original trilogy was being put out on VHS, it was made very clear that you could get the original trilogy, "one last time." Now, I remember thinking about buying them, but then I decided not to. Not because I thought they'd actually put them out on another format (although I'm sure plenty of folks did), but just because I wasn't interested enough.

    Anyway, I imagine there'd be quite a few people upset if the originals came out on DVD, complaining that they were told that the originals were going to be available only "one last time."

    One final comment. I decided to finally read the Lord of the Rings books before the movies came out. In the introduction, it's mentioned how many revisions the book went through. Edits by Tolkien and then later by his son. Now, I understand that printed literature is a different medium than cinema, but I've personally never heard anyone complain about Tolkien making edits to his story, to fit closer to his creative vision.

    Ah well. It's only entertainment. :)

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  128. Upload it, Man! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you waiting for? Digitize that shit and put it on KaZaA! Like that other dude said, we're never going to get this stuff through legit channels!

    1. Re:Upload it, Man! by eMartin · · Score: 1

      I would if I had a working VCR.

  129. Offtopic? by blixel · · Score: 1

    Uhh... ok. My mistake I guess. I thought the topic was Star Wars.

  130. Storm Troopers were clones? by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

    Are the Storm Troopers clones? I thought they were regular people. I realize the clone army was clones, but I didn't think the storm troopers were clones. . .

    1. Re:Storm Troopers were clones? by Yanthor · · Score: 1

      I've only read a few Star Wars books, but I remember the ones I read saying that after the fall of the Empire, the warlords governing the remaining pieces of the empire started recruiting real people to work as Stormtroopers because they didn't have access to the clone factories anymore.

      But I'm not exactly a Star Wars scholar.

      --
      ---=+=---
      "Now if I were a landing thruster, which one of these would I be?"
      -- Londo in Babylon 5
  131. Quit Whining about what if's by Jedikahuna · · Score: 1

    Ok I have HAD ENUGH. A buddy calls me up and tells me all these changes that are "supposed" to be in the movie. EX All Stormtropers are clones and that there voice will be Jango Fett's, and that he red it on /. So I look. and here you are all are bitching about something happening that you have no clue of maybe it will be a "super duper very extra special edition" or maybe it'll be the Special editions, with Gredo shooting first or...... I'm sorry all I heard was Bla Bla Bla I'm guessing on all of this cuz I'm an arm chair director. I'll tell you what all of you just give up on the whole thing and mail all your collectables (that I know all us geeks have) to me. Or hang on and complain after they come out. PS VADER ALWAYS HAS FALLEN INTO LAVA.

    --
    Peace, Love, And Oreo cookies
    1. Re:Quit Whining about what if's by slycer9 · · Score: 1

      This from the same person who is such a fanboi that he'll suck up anything dribbling from the end of Lucas' creative cock, but he won't pony up the cash to pay the fee for SWG?

      For your info dude, (and I'm not going to search for the link), the info I told you about, was from a 3rd party link, with confirmed changes. NOT from the 'Armchair Director' set here on /.

      Like I told you last night, it's not whining about the fact that we don't like the changes, it's the fact that we want the...(drumroll please)...MOVIE WE SAW FIRST!!!

      Yah the acting was bad in spots, yah the special effects were kinda cheesy...but Jebus Crisp...I think we've shown over the years that those thing ultimately didn't matter...we still spent unGODly amounts of money on those 3 movies...BEFORE Greedo shot first.

      Think about it... ...and Bobby...please for the love of god...spellcheck....

      --
      Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    2. Re:Quit Whining about what if's by Jedikahuna · · Score: 1

      Why u got to use my name????? I called you a buddy not BRENT? I still haven't seen a list from Mr. Lucas. These are his movies let the guy do what he wants. I mean for Christ's sake we wouldn't tell Kevin Smith how to write a Jay and Bob movie.. Ok so I'm a lucas sell out. and SWG is a rip off 40 for the game and 15 to play please.

      --
      Peace, Love, And Oreo cookies
  132. For every Ewok you add... by TelevisioSledgicus · · Score: 1

    ...a thousand must die. That's the ONLY way to fix Jedi.

  133. Lucas and failure by finance (THX spoiler) by metamatic · · Score: 1

    The idea of the Empire failing due to budgetary constraints would actually be a return to a favorite theme of Lucas's. Consider THX-1138, where THX escapes simply because the city feels it's uneconomic to spend any more money catching him.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  134. secret info on the DVD by falsification · · Score: 1
    Here is the secret info on the DVD collection.

    First, the DVD will only be available as a collection.

    Second, there will be several options for viewing the film: Luke can view the Imperial Star Destroyer with his binoculars from Tatooine or not, the Storm Troopers can speak in the voice of Jango Fett or not, Greedo or Han can shoot first, Yoda can be green or not, IG-88 can have a specially expanded role or not, the Snaggletooths can have politically correct dentistry or not, the Ewoks can look and sound like Ewoks or like Wookies, Anakin Skywalker can speak in the voice of Hayden Christensen or not, and Lando can get out of the second Death Star in time or not.

    For episodes 1-3, special edition DVDs, there is a rumor that Natalie Portman's voice will be electronically replaced with the voice of Debbie Reynolds, the actual mother of Carrie Fisher.

    I can't wait.

  135. Proposal ... by TexasCowboy23 · · Score: 1

    A proposal to the Star Wars community-at-large. How many people would be interested in re-writing and re-doing Episodes I, II, and III to make them of the same epic quality as Episodes IV, V, and VI? And how many people would be interested in writing and filming Episodes VII, VIII, and IX -- which had been planned from the start but something Lucas abandoned in the more recent years? From my way of thinking, I figure once Lucas dies (which I hope is here soon), then filming can begin on the REAL movies.

    --
    Seth Anderson BTW, I'm not 23 anymore -- I am TexasCowboy26 now. =)
  136. "For want of a nail..." by StrawberryOnSlashdot · · Score: 1

    You know, like five minutes into Star Wars, the whole fall of the Empire coulda been averted by that Star Destroyer temp and his manager -- the ones who gave us this conversation:

    "There goes another escape pod..."
    "Wait, scanners show no lifeforms... it must've malfunctioned... don't bother shooting it."
    (I'm paraphrasing)

    But had they shot it, well, that would been an awfully short film.

    Although I seem to recall many Bothans dying getting the rebels some information... would it have been enough without the tech specs from R2? Who knows, perhaps the rebels would've have to sneak into the Death Star like the Checy Chase's SNL Land Shark....

    "Who is this? What's your operating number?"
    "CandyGram..."

  137. Hmm. by jtheory · · Score: 1

    Well, that's a nice reminder of how slashcode works. The sig is inserted dynamically, of course (which makes sense since users can choose to hide sigs), so now that you've fixed your sig this whole exchange makes no sense whatsoever. Cruel, cruel to us poor meta-moderators.

    What was the original sig with virii in it? I know you fixed the "true measure or a good coder" thing, because I remember noticing the typo in the original one (I was a writing tutor in college for 3 years, and I can't help seeing all errors... but I don't point them out anymore). I like that sig -- it reminds me of this:

    "There are two ways of constructing a software design; one way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult."
    - C. A. R. Hoare

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
    1. Re:Hmm. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know exactly what you mean. My previous sig generated a lot of comments. It went like this:

      So, if the plural of "virus" is "virii", then I guess the plural of "radius" is "radiii".

      I got several comments correcting my pluralization of "radius", which means they obviously missed my point.

      I love the quote you gave... I'm going to add it to my quotes file. Thanks!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.