Slashdot Mirror


iTunes 4.2 and QuickTime 6.5

usr122122121 writes "iTunes 4.2 and QuickTime 6.5 were released today, available by Apple's Site and Software Update (respectively)."

467 comments

  1. The Comic Book Guy says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ".. shortest news item, ever"

    1. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by m0topilot · · Score: 1

      Including windows version? or just for apple version?

    2. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by phildog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, is this available via Software Update as well? Sorry - couldn't resist pretending I didn't RTF'ing tiny article...

      --
      slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
    3. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by l1gunman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup. Already had it down before this news "broke", helping my kid learn how to rip, mix and burn. The version says 4.2.0.72. Have to check the Mac version when I get home tonight...

    4. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by usr122122121 · · Score: 4, Informative
      ".. shortest news item, ever"
      Apparently Apple also thought the news item was too short... so they released Xcode 1.1, which is also available through Software Update (if you have the developer tools installed). Yet another update to add to the list :-)
      --

      -braxton
    5. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by Decameron81 · · Score: 1

      If you mean Xcode 1.0.1 that's not new. I couldn't find a trace of v1.1 in Apple's site or through Software update.

      Diego Rey

      --
      diegoT
    6. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No. He meant 1.1. I just downloaded it via software update too.

    7. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by neillewis · · Score: 1

      I didn't get it either. Has it been withdrawn?

    8. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by Fletch · · Score: 1

      I didn't get it either. Has it been withdrawn?

      Yes. The only thread I could quickly find about it is on version tracker.

    9. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by stingerman101 · · Score: 1

      From the Apple xCode Forum:

      "Due to a server-side glitch, we had to pull the update. We are working on the problem and I'll post when it is available again."

    10. Re:The Comic Book Guy says... by Decameron81 · · Score: 1

      Yes, quite weird. I just got the iTunes update on my software update now. Not a sign of Xcode 1.1 yet tho.

      Seems like Apple's Software update tries to reduce bandwidth with this delayed-update method?

      Diego Rey

      --
      diegoT
  2. Hmmm.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder...could they have fixed the hack that Mr. Johanson made? Even on the windows version?

    Just a thought...

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      not for the long run at least..

      it was more of a proof of concept type of a thing anyways.

      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Hmmm.... by JeffTL · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, actually, he didn't do anything except insert a loopback somewhere up in Quicktime...you could already do about the same thing with any audio capture utility, or for that matter a CD-RW drive.

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      I'm really surprised that people are still talking about his vaporware. If you want to reencode an AAC to an MP3. Open the AAC in Soundstudio and save it as an MP3, its very easy.

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since all he did was rip some stuff out of memory, it seems changing anything and recompiling would fix the hack. And since it's still going to have to bring audio into memory at some point, releasing a new version of the hack for the new version of quicktime should take Mr. Johansen about 15 minutes.

    5. Re:Hmmm.... by line.at.infinity · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Which hack was that?

      QTFairUse.

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Didn't his hack rip the data somewhere inbetween decryption and decoding, so no unnecessary lossy compression steps were needed?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Hmmm.... by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ugh its not a hack. using the API is not a hack. heck its been done so much before "dvd jon" wrote his little program, i was amazed slashdot had it as "news"... geez some people here are such sheep.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    8. Re:Hmmm.... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

      Is that possible? Well, I guess anything is possible. Here's another, big-hassle way of getting the DRM out of there. Burn a regular audio CD out of your iTunes AACs, then encode that CD back to AAC. Still lossy, but less so that some other methods.

      --
      Harold
    9. Re:Hmmm.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Sure it's possible, the decrypted data has to go into memory at one point or another. As for your solution, I don't see how it's less lossy than any other method. It's probably more lossy than you think, since itunes AACs are from 24 bit sources and CDs are only 16 bit. That's actually a big selling point for me, but as long as I can't use the file however I want. (i.e. play them on any operating with my choice of player) I'm not about to give them any money. So instead, I'm looking forward to seeing itunes rips on suprnova.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Hmmm.... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

      What's suprnova? That's the second time I've heard of it this week.

      --
      Harold
    11. Re:Hmmm.... by raverbuzzy · · Score: 1

      since itunes AACs are from 24 bit sources and CDs are only 16 bit

      Hmm. I'm pretty sure that the AAC's on the ITMS are ripped from cd and encoded by the music companies themselves.

    12. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Hmmm.... by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder...could they have fixed the hack that Mr. Johanson made? Even on the windows version?

      Do you think they care? I think Apple's protection is intended to be closer to the chain on your front door than to Fort Knox: not intended to stop the experienced thief, but simply to reduce temptation to passersby.

    14. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But its 24 bits, and from Apple. Those two combinations are greater than God (at ramming you in the ass, of course!).

    15. Re:Hmmm.... by james+b · · Score: 2, Informative

      I belive Jon's program did a little more: It got into Quicktime after decryption but before decoding, resulting in an AAC file digitally identical to the original one, but freely copyable.

      All the methods involving audio capture or burn-then-rip involve some 'transcoding' loss in audio quality as the file is decompressed, captured, then usually recompressed to AAC or mp3. /james

    16. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no no no, you have it all wrong. he used dll injection to get at the unencrypted AAC as quicktime played the file... as in, no quality loss like one would get if they captured the decoded audio in wav format and re-encoded.

    17. Re:Hmmm.... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative
      First of all, it's not vaporware. Secondly, Soundstudio is a Mac OS X app (I believe, assuming we're thinking of the same Soundstudio here), and there aren't any apps I know of for Windows that will open a _protected_ m4p file and encode the stream to an MP3 directly.


      Third, as I mentioned in my QTFairUse guide above, you might find that unprotected AAC audio which you can easily get from QTFairUse is a nice way to listen to your iTunes Music Store songs using WinAmp or non-Apple AAC-capable hardware players, without any quality loss whatsoever. The myths that QTFairUse doesn't work or do anything just aren't true - it is a pain to use in its current form, but it works, and it is useful for some of us. And it's the only way I know of besides stream recording or burn-and-rip to go from M4P to MP3 on a Windows box.

    18. Re:Hmmm.... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read a news item about the company that encodes the 30-second preview files for iTunes and other music services. I can't remember their name right now, but they encode directly from the master recordings. I'm not sure if they handle the entire encoding operation, though. By the way, this company is going to start offering its tools to other companies so they can start their own music services.

      --
      Harold
  3. Quicktime 6.5 by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hm - hopefully this will fix the problem of "No One Lives Forever 2" not being able to function in Quicktime 6.4. Otherwise, I'm going to install Jaguar to my iPod and boot off that when I want some "Cate Archer" sneaking action.

    1. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right-on! I got to play that game for about a week before I had to install panther to play with xcode. I can't believe that the retail Apple store I bought it at has been selling a game for the last two months that won't work on an up-to-date system (I had to downgrade QT on jaguar) - Apple should have pulled it until macplay got it working (even if it was apple that broke quicktime). Good idea with the ipod - I hadn't thought of that, thanks.

    2. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      I can't claim originality - someone else mentioned they were using their "external HDD", and I thought "iPod" - I mean, I'm only using 15 GB for music on a 30 GB iPod. Jaguar and NOLF2 should fit on their with room to spare - unless I find out that Quicktime 6.5 works.

      Oh, and I'm torked their selling it in stores and don't have it working too. I mean - duh, people. At least my review copy of Alien Versus Predator 2 works.

    3. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by jpkunst · · Score: 5, Informative

      Quicktime 6.5 does not fix the No One Lives Forever 2 problem with QT 6.4. I just tried it.

      Back to rebooting in 10.2.8/QT 6.3 for Cate Archer action.

      JP

    4. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      Damn! Well, that saves me some time. When I get home, time to pull out the Panther CD and my iPod.

      Poop. Poop, poop, poop.

    5. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by Fred+IV · · Score: 5, Informative

      Otherwise, I'm going to install Jaguar to my iPod and boot off that when I want some "Cate Archer" sneaking action.

      You might consider checking with Apple first to see if it will screw up your warranty.

      iPodHacks warns that booting off your iPod might be considered "abuse" by Apple if you have problems later.

      FIV
    6. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by andfarm · · Score: 1

      Right -- trying to boot off the iPod will burn out the hard drive after some time, voiding the warranty.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    7. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      I was in an Apple store today (eyeing Halo again) and asked about that. The Genius guy looked at me, looked at the iPod warrantee, and said "Have fun with Panther on it."

      So I think you're describing a "non-issue" - but I'm buying Applecare for my iPod in January, so I'm not really concerned.

      Damn - I left it out in my car.

    8. Re:Quicktime 6.5 by andfarm · · Score: 1

      Hrm. When I asked an Apple guy about it, he said Apple had a few iPods in-house they had burned out by running an OS off of them. The problem is really just that there's very little cooling available for the drive, and it'll overheat if it isn't allowed to spin down often enough.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  4. Changelog? by gricholson75 · · Score: 1

    Really what has been changed?

    1. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here it is:

      * Change version number from 4.1 to 4.2
      * ????
      * Profit!!!

    2. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can now use an AOL account to sign in and buy songs from iTMS.

    3. Re:Changelog? by adamwright · · Score: 4, Informative

      What's new in iTunes 4.2

      iTunes 4.2 allows you to sign in and buy music from the iTunes Music Store using either your AOL or Apple Account, view the iTunes Music Store in a separate window, and includes a number of performance improvements.

      (And yes, that really was the extent of the changes listed in the help and readme after I downloaded it).

    4. Re:Changelog? by hpavc · · Score: 5, Informative

      forget about AOL support ... you can group tracks now! awesome

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    5. Re:Changelog? by The+Limp+Devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It still doesn't minimize to the tray (single most common complaint on Windows), but maximize does make it full screen now. Otherwise there's no discernible diffeence.

    6. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Wow, if people had to pay for those extra features, it sure wouldn't have made the front of Slashdot...

      </sarcasm>

      Sorry, but a dinky free upgrade like that has no place here. If it cost money, we could at least complain about it.

    7. Re:Changelog? by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Performance improvements are a serious thing, though. I seem to remember the main gripe when iTunes for Windows was first released was mediocre-at-best performance.

      How big are the performance improvements, has anyone gotten the chance to try this under windows?

    8. Re:Changelog? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      who cares? Download, install, and then brag to your friends how up to date your system is.

    9. Re:Changelog? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look for Itunes-sidekick. It's a plugin for Itunes for Windows that adds, among other things, minimizing to the tray.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    10. Re:Changelog? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Cool :)
      Now, if only we can get tabbed browsing for the ITMS :)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    11. Re:Changelog? by allgood2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple's Read Me's are always notably lacking information on specific changes, possible because parts of the read me display in the software update and installers. Anyway, Apple often releases specific details as part of its knowledge base.

      My quick review of changes in iTunes 4.2 on Mac OS X (sorry won't have access to a Win2k machine until next week), these are the immediate changes I notice:

      Hot Tips
      http://www.apple.com/itunes/hottips/
      Apple introduced hot tips on creating Smart Playlist, keyboard shortcuts, copy song, artist, and album urls from the iTunes Music Store, etc.

      Grouping
      Under song details, there is now a new ID3 tag called grouping. I'm not certain if this will allow for subcategories, or can be used for things such as Celebrity Playlist so songs from multiple albums can be grouped. I'll have to play with it. Also added to Smart Playlist queries.

      Artwork
      Added scaler to artwork, so images can be scaled up or down to fit album space area.

      Playlist from Selection
      For those who complained about queue-ing songs, I imagine this feature will come in handy, as well as for other purposes as well. Allows you to Command-Select (Click) on random songs in your library then create a playlist from them, immediately.

      Music Store in New Window
      Double-clicking will launch the music store in a new window (yeah).

      iTMS: Music Essentials
      Like Celebrity playlist, but collections of "iTunes Essential" music in categories I wouldn't have imagined, including Disco Ball Essentials and Coctail Party Kitsch--yet more ways to spend even more money.

      iTMS: AOL Sessions
      Added more music "exclusives" basically various performances by artist for AOL can now be purchased.

      iTMS: AOL Users
      Tons of direct access stuff for AOL users. Which, if they can do this for AOL, maybe they could do it for other venues, like artist who do live concert releases.

      iTMS: Artist Self-Released Albums (Return of the EP)
      This was there before, but some artist like Pearl Jam who are self published are and can now release stuff directly to the iTMS. I also noticed John Mayer's "As Is" is not attributed to Sony or any music label (which may indicate that it was also self-published). Ben Folds have also been doing a number of quick EPs, but they are all still published attributed to EPIC. It will be interesting to see if more artist start releasing EPs with 4-5 songs exclusively for iTMS or other music stores, and then have regular albums published every 1-2yrs.

      These were the things I noticed immediately. Now I need to go and play and see what else comes up.

    12. Re:Changelog? by geniusj · · Score: 1

      Can you explain this? How?

    13. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My main gripe with performance was that the play/pause and skip controls were slow to respond, and at times would seemingly not detect clicks. This seems to have fixed. The application also maximizes correctly now at higher resolutions, which is a big plus. It's not a revolutionary upgrade, but definately worth getting.

    14. Re:Changelog? by Quikah · · Score: 2, Informative

      My crappy P3-500 256MB system at work runs it about the same as before, still pretty slow, but it works. They changed the Maximize button behavior, now it actually maximizes the window instead of toggling the mini-player. I actually liked the previous behavior, I rarely maximize windows, don't see the point usually.

      --
      Q.
    15. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This isn't funny at all.

    16. Re:Changelog? by quantaman · · Score: 1

      Here it is:

      * Change version number from 4.1 to 4.2
      * ????
      * Profit!!!


      Unfortunatly that plan doesn't work so well with freeware :)

      --
      I stole this Sig
    17. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that you (all) are doing just fine complaining about this article. We're an adaptable species.

    18. Re:Changelog? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Linus' Porsche.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    19. Re:Changelog? by Spyky · · Score: 1

      How is the playlist from selection new? It was in 4.1 too, I don't see any difference.

      I'm not sure I really understand what the Grouping category is intended for, but it could be used to do some nice things with Smart Playlists.

      -Spyky

    20. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they change the codecs? I.E. - are they making it difficult for competing software to maintain compatibility? I'm not saying they are, I'm just wondering. It's a time-honored lowly practice of software manufacturers everywhere. I'll sing their praises if they don't play that game.

    21. Re:Changelog? by allgood2 · · Score: 1

      > playlist from selection was in 4.1

      My bad then, I never noticed it 4.1. Possibly because I already knew the command keys for creating a new playlist and or create a new smart playlist.

      Grouping I think opens up a lot of possibilities. It could be used as either a super- or sub-category, so that really large categories like Rock or Alternative in my lists could be broken down more; or it could be used (which is what I'm leaning towards) to affiliate songs with collections--say celebrity playlists, or the iTunes Essentials, etc. It will be interesting to see what others are thinking about using it for.

    22. Re:Changelog? by xie · · Score: 1

      I have found the most annoying change to be in the fact that you now have to go under options and choose "mini player" instead of just being able to hit the center button in the top left. I know, I know, theres a shortcut key option but I still find it a pain in the arse.

    23. Re:Changelog? by drx · · Score: 1

      Of course you don't see the point if you never minimize your windows, coz it will be under them!

    24. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the other way around, surely. Apple has discovered the missing second step.

      1) ???
      2) Change version number from 4.1 to 4.2
      3) Profit!!

      With this plan, it doesn't even matter if they themselves don't know what step one is.

  5. QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Any news on a Linux client yet for QT?

    1. Re:QT: Linux client? by renelicious · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah this is really annoying to me. I mean I can remember sometime back when Steve Jobs said "We love open source". However now that its time to show it, where is Apple. They wouldn't even have to write a client, if they would just release a (closed source is fine) quicktime/iTunes ACC lib.

      I would run to a Windows box or Mac to buy songs as long as I could just play them on my Linux box, that's all I'm askin for.

      --
      "Luke, I am your node.parent();"
    2. Re:QT: Linux client? by protohiro1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why, oh why do we have an MPEG-4 standard if no one wants to use it? Mpeg-4 works under most movie players (including the DivX player). And quicktime comes with an ecoder. What's not to like?

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    3. Re:QT: Linux client? by Gwala · · Score: 1

      The compression ratio. XviD surpasses it by far, and the latest DivX offerings do likewise. There's also a compatibility issue. Most is not all. The DivX player is shite, and unless you have an mpg4 codec (which isnt packaged outside a codec pack - most computer user's have nfi about that.) you wont be able to use anything else. Most PC user's have DivX, and recognise the name, XviD is getting that way. But mpg4? good luck.

      If you are going to encode something, FlaskMPG or similar, provide a much larger offering of option's than Quicktime for encoding, and tend to do a much better job. But based on the trend to go with 'all-in-one-droolware', I guess people arnt willing to encode thing's properly anymore. *sigh*.

      Bah, my karma's going to hell for that, I can tell already.

      -Adam

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
    4. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When he said "We love open source", he meant "We love open source we can make a profit from.".

      Releasing an ACC lib, so some linux users use it, won't really effect their bottom line.

    5. Re:QT: Linux client? by Zelet · · Score: 1

      I am a huge Apple fan and I totally agree with you. I think it is shit that they haven't ported iTunes or at least Quicktime to linux.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    6. Re:QT: Linux client? by Graymalkin · · Score: 1
      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    7. Re:QT: Linux client? by mcc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Apple said they love open source. Not that they love linux. Apple is using materials from open source projects such as BSD and Konqueror, and they are contributing code back to those same projects. I don't see why this means they have an obligation to write some big complicated AAC library for UNIX when the UNIX OSes don't even seem to have a totally homogenous way to playback sound.

      I'd concentrate on seeing what you can do to get Wine to accept iTunes if you want to use iTunes Music Store in Linux.

      If you really want something native, MPlayer can play AAC already. All it needs to play iTMS purchases is to get past the DRM wrapper. The DRM wrapper on iTMS purchases is the technology sold by a company called "Fairplay". Perhaps you could try contacting Fairplay and asking if you could license their tech for playback in MPlayer? Or even better, you could perhaps just contact Apple directly and say you are interested in writing code to add iTMS playback support to MPlayer, and you would be willing to go under NDA and such... Wait, what's that you say? You don't have the time or linux programming knowledge to add FairPlay support to MPlayer? Well, apparently neither does Apple.

    8. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam,
      no matter how true, don't say anything negative on /., period.

      QT (at least on Windows) is a buggy, slow, resource gobbling, stuttery pile of garbage, in stark contrast to at least WMP, RealOne, and VLC - they are not without their problems, but all are light years ahead of QT. Try downloading it now from Apple, it's actually iTunes plus QT. I use QT Alternative, which displays the same videos with the same CODECS with 1/10th the processor loading, stuttering, and skipping.

    9. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use QT Alternative, which displays the same videos with the same CODECS with 1/10th the processor loading, stuttering, and skipping.

      Then you're using Quicktime. What exactly do you think those codecs are?
      I'm so sick of people whining about Quicktime who don't know the difference between an app and a library it calls.

      If you don't like Apple's player app, use another there or plenty, or write your own, the API is well documented and quite extensive.

    10. Re:QT: Linux client? by raydaniels · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm guessing that the reason they haven't ported Quicktime to Linux has more to do with the licenses for all the codecs that Quicktime depends on (from other vendors) and not any fault really of Apple's. Quicktime without all the codecs wouldn't really be Quicktime, and it's likely not in Apple's interest to dilute their brand for no good reason.

    11. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I want to work on Wine to accept iTunes? It's much easier to say "Fuck off, Apple. I just won't use your product. I will take my business elsewhere."

    12. Re:QT: Linux client? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      honestly how do you expect them to do this. It's the same problem for any commercial app. How are they going to produce a binary that will work on all distros just fine? I'm sure they could produce a gnome GTK version, but I doubt people would be happy about that.

      They know they will never make people happy in the linux world with no matter what they do. And really what is going to have a version out there for so few people going to gain them.

    13. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not any fault really of Apple's

      HAHAHA

      100% typical of an Apple zealot, of course nothing is Apples fault.

    14. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a linux client? why? so even more of you can whine "why doesn't it have ogg?"

    15. Re:QT: Linux client? by ErixTr · · Score: 1

      How are they going to produce a binary that will work on all distros just fine?

      Check Opera web browser. They can manage this.

      --
      less is more
    16. Re:QT: Linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda like it's much easier for apple to turn arround and say "Fuck off linux community, we'll just take our business elsewhere."

  6. Awesome! by bennomatic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our new iTunes and QuickTime overlords.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  7. just wondering by Dreadlord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    any plans of a Linux version of iTunes? Since Mac OS X kernel is BSD, I guess porting to Linux wouldn't be that hard.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:just wondering by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      any plans of a Linux version of iTunes? Since Mac OS X kernel is BSD, I guess porting to Linux wouldn't be that hard.

      This is kinda like saying it would not be hard to port Internet Explorer to DOS. There are a number of problems with porting iTunes to Linux, mainly:

      • iTunes relies heavily on QuickTime for playback and importing/encoding audio. Since QuickTime does not (officially) exist for Linux, this would be a big problem.
      • It would be a pain in the neck for Apple to support even just the major Linux distributions. Odds are they are not going to just release a source tarball for people to compile for their distro. Different kernel versions, libraries, etc. would complicate things a lot, especially with regards to burning CDs from inside iTunes.

      Granted, iTunes was successfully ported to an OS that has no real UNIX underpinnings in common with OS X (Windows), but the fact that QuickTime already existed in a mature state for that platform eased things a great deal I'm sure. It's not impossible, but there is little incentive for Apple to put the rather gargantuan effort required into porting iTunes Linux.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    2. Re:just wondering by zulux · · Score: 4, Insightful

      any plans of a Linux version of iTunes? Since Mac OS X kernel is BSD, I guess porting to Linux wouldn't be that hard.

      I kind of doubt it.

      They *could* do it - but probably won't for marketing reasons.

      Apple makes it's money selling Apple hardware - if in their eyes they think that there are a few Linux users that will buy an Apple just to have Quicktime, iTunes, iMovie etc - then they'll just refuse.

      Apple has to have a Windows version of Quicktime - othewise the movie studios woulden't bother trying to use Quicktime for Apple's 8% market share.

      Apple make itunes for Windows to expose Windows users to the iPod and to the Apple "expeience" - they're hoping to get some coverts. "This iTunes is pretty cool - I really would like a whole computer that behaves this nicley, instead of all this windows crap."

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:just wondering by damiam · · Score: 1

      Aside from some remotely related basic components, an OSX GUI program and a Linux GUI program are completely different in every way. It'd probably be easier to port the Windows version than the Mac version.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:just wondering by ejunek · · Score: 1

      Although the backend code is BSD, the graphical frontend would be difficult to replicate in Linux and probably not what they would consider a reasonable investment of resources given the returns. It took iTunes four versions just to be ported to the PC where potential revenue is huge. It would be nice, but Apple isn't giving away iTunes out of the kindness of their heart...they want it to improve their bottom line, and I don't see the Linux community doing that for them. (They'd rather have you go out and buy a Powerbook ;-)

    5. Re:just wondering by Dreadlord · · Score: 1

      Mmm, but iTunes is mainly used to buy music online, not to play music, QuickTime maybe used to preview music, but I think they can use Linux OSS or something similar, or just give the user the preview file to play using MPlayer or Xine, so I think QuickTime isn't that important in porting iTunes.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    6. Re:just wondering by Gilesx · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be honest, your best bet right now is to check out the Rhythmbox project at http://www.rhythmbox.org

      It has an interface similar to iTunes, supports Ripping, as many audio formats as Gstreamer can handle (including mp3, and ogg), and will soon be able to burn to CDs as well.

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    7. Re:just wondering by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1
      iTunes relies heavily on QuickTime for playback and importing/encoding audio. Since QuickTime does not (officially) exist for Linux, this would be a big problem

      It might be if quicktime were not also an apple product! Apple could easily write a linux client, it would not be as simple as a recompile, but neither was a windows port! There isn't an incentive to do so. But in the long run this will come back to bite them. Linux is growing in niche desktop markets especially the engineering workstation and certain corporate desktops. It is also gaining worldwide attention as an alternative to Microsoft and US hegemony. Dismissing it and open source now can and will have future consequences.

    8. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your justification for one Apple product not working with Linux is because another Apple product does not work with Linux?
      I see Apple in common here.

      Your second reason is another big excuse. If they wanted to create a Linux, they could. Bottom line is they don't.

    9. Re:just wondering by vruba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The kernel (Mach, in Mac OS X's case) doesn't matter much to a media player. Obviously things like hardware support and i/o latency make a difference, but more or less any modern OS will support something that supports MP3 playing. It probably wasn't a matter of a quick recompile, but iTunes works fine on Windows, which has a completely different hardware and low-level software architecture.

      What makes the difference here is having a media architecture. iTunes floats on QuickTime, which Apple trusts to work really well with various audio codecs (and their DRM schemes). Besides that, it's (")just(") some GUI, network, security, and disc-burning code. QuickTime is the central issue here; Apple would not make iTunes for mpg123/ALSA/whatever.

      But if you're asking "Why haven't they ported QuickTime to Linux yet?", I agree. I suppose they might be thinking like this:

      1. We want to sell Macintoshes, and, if possible, software.
      2. Let's make a killer app so people will want to buy Macs, and call it QuickTime.
      3. But wait ... if we make it Mac-only, not even Mac users will want to use it, because it'll be outnumbered by whatever Microsoft comes up with the stamp it out.
      4. So let's port it, and make it a model citizen in the Windows envirnoment, so most everyone will be able to use it while associating it with Apple.
      5. Port to Linux? Why? We want these people to moan and whine about not being able to watch .mov trailers, and talk themselves into buying a tibook. Obviously they're already vulnerable to Unix. Mwahahahrahra!

      In other words, they have to port to Windows if they want it to survive at all. But they're the powerful ones in comparison to Linux, and they can just try to borg its users.

      Disclaimers: (1) this is pure speculation, (2) I use Mac OS X considerably more than Linux these days, and (3) I'm feeding a troll.

    10. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i want to see a Linux port of Quicktime player...

    11. Re:just wondering by JWW · · Score: 1

      If iTunes existed for Linux I would buy music at their store. As it is I'm not doing much downloading of music anymore (of course I will buy no CDs either). I would truly appreciate Apple having a Linux version of iTunes.

      That being said, I would like to have a mac as well, I just don't have that kind of money lying around.

    12. Re:just wondering by shotfeel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mmm, but iTunes is mainly used to buy music online, not to play music

      No, iTunes on the Mac has been the premier app for organizing and listening to music for waaaay longer than iTunes Music Store has existed. Still is.

    13. Re:just wondering by damiam · · Score: 2, Informative

      OSS and Quicktime have nothing to do with each other. OSS is an API for communicating with a sound card. Quicktime is a hugely complex media framework for reading, editing, playing, displaying, and otherwise working with many types of files, from text to movies to audio. Gstreamer and Quicktime would be a more accurate matchup. Unfortunately, Gstreamer is not quite ready for major use at the moment.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    14. Re:just wondering by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it's probably not your fault, unless you're trolling...
      Why is it that nearly every story about an Apple product, someone says "Well, the kernels are UNIX, so I wonder if there's gonna be a port to Linux..."? Apple won't port software unless there is incentive to do so (read $$$). They are firstly a hardware company. If you want iTunes, Apple wants you to buy a Mac--they'll settle for you buying a PC and an iPod. If you want cool products, either buy them or make your own, but please, please stop wondering if Apple will ever do anything nice for the Linux people. It's just not cost-effective at this place-and-time.

    15. Re:just wondering by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You hit the nail on the head. If linux is ever to succeed on the desktop, the distros will have to agree upon one common set of libraries and a common default window manager. I personally don't see that happening any time soon so Windows will continue to rule and the only viable alternative for the desktop with commercial apps is OS X. Perhaps OS X will achieve a 10-15% market share as people get tired of waiting for longhorn over the next few years.

      Commercial Apps must be able to run in binary form on all major distros if linux is to gain any significant marketshare on the desktop.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    16. Re:just wondering by jfengel · · Score: 1

      I've been using iTunes on windows, and it's not filling me with a hankering to run out to get a Mac.

      It's fine, certainly. The problems I've had have been trivial ones. But I find them to be about as aggravating as the ones I have to deal with on Windows on a daily basis.

      I didn't find it any easier to use than RealOne. No harder, just not significantly easier. I use iTunes because I do like what Apple does, in general (and I own a tiny piece of stock), and conversely Real pisses me off as a company. But in this case I found the software roughly equivalent.

    17. Re:just wondering by Nalgas+D.+Lemur · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mmm, but iTunes is mainly used to buy music online, not to play music, QuickTime maybe used to preview music, but I think they can use Linux OSS or something similar, or just give the user the preview file to play using MPlayer or Xine, so I think QuickTime isn't that important in porting iTunes.

      If you're only speaking in terms of what it does that can't already be done well by something else in Linux, then yes, iTunes mainly is just for buying stuff from the iTMS. However, the way that's worded, it sounds more like a comment on what people who use iTunes use it for. People who use it, in my experience, do not use it primarily to buy things. It's been the primary MP3 player/organizer on the Mac for most people for years now (probably since SoundJam was discontinued), kind of like how everyone uses WinAmp on Windows, but with a less profoundly odd interface (which is a whole different story...don't get me started on using ZXCVB for play/stop/ff/rw/etc. or how unintuitive that is).

      If it were to be ported, I don't see Apple just porting the store and not the rest of the features iTunes has. From what I've seen, they seem to want to keep everything together in products like that, because the presentation and the total package are a vital part of their image.

      The point of iTunes isn't to buy music, it's to have a completely integrated music experience where everything is handled in a simple, streamlined way with a consistent interface. The only single missing feature from other software is the iTMS, but passing files between different apps in Linux to accomplish the same thing isn't the "Apple way". In iTunes, you can seamlessly buy songs from the iTMS, have them automatically added to your master playlist and your music folder, create a new playlist of songs (even automatically based on criteria you specify, if you want), then burn it to a CD and have it all synced to your iPod, with maybe a dozen mouse clicks, all in the same familiar interface, pretty much straight out of the box.

      So no, it probably wouldn't be that hard to just port the iTMS frontend itself and write something to handle the AAC files (with their minimal DRM...I'm sure there's plenty of stuff to play normal AAC files already), but that just isn't how Apple works. If you don't get the full experience of it, where's the incentive to go out and buy their products in the future? There won't be Linux iTunes unless they can use it to entice enough people to use OS X on Apple hardware to make the cost of porting the full app worth it.

    18. Re:just wondering by denzombie · · Score: 4, Funny
      Support Nightmare:

      Caller: iTunes segfaults when I execute it.

      Phone Agent: What distro are you using.

      Caller: Gentoo.

      PA: Oh, we only support RedHat 7.2

      Caller: Well can you tell me what the dependencies are. I'll just emerge them.

      PA: Ummmm. We only support Red Hat.

      Caller: What about Fedora? I've got a boxen running that.

      PA: Ok, ummm, is that a version of Red Hat?

      Caller: Grrrr. Never Mind

      and so on...

      --
      --- Evil robots don't kill people, Mad scientists kill people.
    19. Re:just wondering by tenton · · Score: 2, Informative

      The back end of iTunes is not really BSD; iTunes is a Carbon application (having migrated from SoundJam on OS 9 to iTunes on OS 9 to the current Carbon application you see on OS X 10.2+). While the Carbon API runs atop a BSD backend (Darwin), Carbon itself isn't part of BSD, nor is it easily ported to Linux.

    20. Re:just wondering by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ummmm, Apple does *not* have an 8% market share. They may have back in 1997 but they now have 2.9% COE (client operating environment) market share to Linux's 2.8% as per IDC. Linux is expected to overtake Apple for the number 2 spot on the desktop early in 2004. To me that means Apple should refuse, now more than ever, to release Quicktime for Linux since that would only help Linux grab and extend it's lead. The good news for Apple is that Linux is only taking market rank from it, not market share, that's coming from the MS piece of the pie. All that market share crap aside, I still want a 17" PowerBook for x-mas!

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    21. Re:just wondering by SQLz · · Score: 1

      Kernel not issue...graphical toolkits for X is issue.

    22. Re:just wondering by scorpioX · · Score: 4, Informative

      1. Apple makes ~ 10-15 cents on each song (rumors are they are operating iTMS at a slight loss). I don't think you and a few of your friends buying some songs is enough incentive to port iTunes -- they'd need a few millon Linux users for that.

      2. The high-price of Apple machines is a myth that neeeds to die. You can get a Desktop G4 for around $900, and a laptop for a few hundred more. I think that is well within the financial reach of most people. On the other hand, if you want the top of the line dual G5, you have to be willing to pay for it. Just like you do with Dell, HP or any other PC vendor selling the latest and greatest hardware.

    23. Re:just wondering by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      The question is, is it filling you with a hankering to run out and buy an iPod?

      That's what its there for.

    24. Re:just wondering by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought I just read on /. that one of the new Linux based "Smart Phones" has Quicktime support? Apple doesn't need to release the GUI, just the backend processes to work with iTMS and a binary release of QT libraries. Though I doubt Apple will do something like that since their goal is to have you purchase their OS : (

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    25. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm feeding a troll


      no you aren't, just because some lame mod modded him down as troll, doesn't mean he is, the post scores +4 interesting right now.

    26. Re:just wondering by paimin · · Score: 1

      Plus, the kernel isn't BSD, its Mach. Darwin is related to BSD, but the kernel isn't at all. I'm not sure that makes a big difference re portability, but there you are. Also, Arnold didn't run as a Republican, he ran as an Independant. People seem to get that wrong all the time too.

      --
      Facebook is the new AOL
    27. Re:just wondering by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      While I agree that Apple won't probably port Quicktime to Linux, I have to say that any Linux user that's going to buy a TiBook just to use QT hasn't installed Mplayer. It plays QT movie files just fine.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    28. Re:just wondering by jfengel · · Score: 1

      It's filling me with a hankering for an iPod, sure. But since it's not filling me with cash as well, it'll have to wait.

      I'd buy an iPod over its competitors at any price point, but since my price point is well below any of its competitors as well as the iPod there is literally no contest. So I guess I'm the wrong guy to talk to.

    29. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried the Windows version of iTunes and wasn't impressed. I'm sticking with Winamp for now. I don't know much about Macs, but judging by the sheer amount of IE users on windows, you are probably correct.

    30. Re:just wondering by josephpate · · Score: 3, Funny

      You hit the nail on the head. If linux is ever to succeed on the desktop, the distros will have to agree upon one common set of libraries and a common default window manager

      I agree. And that Window Manager should be BlackBox! What's that? You want KDE? And someone else wants Gnome? Ratpoison?

      ......

      We are so screwed.

    31. Re:just wondering by zulux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ummmm, Apple does *not* have an 8% market share.

      Depending on the survey - Apple has anywhere from 2% to 6%.

      I put 8% as it's my hunch that Apple has a larger effective market share when it comes to people who play MP3 and watch movie trailers.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    32. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple claims that porting QT to Linux is not possible because it is not a Unix issue but an "Aqua" issue. Sounds like a lot of FUD to me. If QT were available for Linux then there would be a cross platform alternative to Real (the spyware king)

    33. Re:just wondering by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 1

      yep, and already been implemented:
      rhythmbox

    34. Re:just wondering by alph0ns3 · · Score: 0

      You don't understand how linux, X and window managers are working, don't you? To port iTunes and Quicktime to linux, in binary format, they only have to depend on the kernel and X. They don't need to choose a windows manager, they all use a common interface! If they wanted to make a GNOME app (that's stupid, because GNOME is a Desktop Environment it has it own music player), then that's something else... You know, there's flash, acrobat reader and netscape for linux... there's only a few download available, for the architechture you want, and sometimes, I said sometimes, for a glibc (there is some backward incompatibily between releases because of bugs). About the kernel: There's a switch going on from OSS to ALSA now, so I guess they should make two versions or something. But it's nothing compared to the libraries shit you are talking about.

    35. Re:just wondering by JWW · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, I know all apples aren't _that_ expensive. I just want a G5, so I'll have to wait for the price to come down. :-)

      And true, the only way apple would do support for linux at this time would be just to be nice, I agree that there's not quite enough incentive, yet.

    36. Re:just wondering by nguyenhm · · Score: 1

      Carbon is just the old Mac OS 8/9 API pared down. You can write a Carbon program that runs natively on both OS 9 and OS X. Of course you can also write programs that only run natively on on or the other.l

    37. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Mac OS X kernel is BSD, I guess porting to Linux wouldn't be that hard.

      Yeah, especially since they both use the same sort of display.

      Oh wait, that's right, OSX uses DPDF/Quartz and Linux uses X11.

      No matter, at least they both have the Carbon frameworks.

      Oh wait, that's right, OSX uses Carbon and Linux uses a myriad of libraries for X11 GUI stuffs.

      I guess after Apple ports Quartz and Carbon to Linux for free, since Linux users will go nuts if Apple charges for those libraries, Apple can spend even more money porting iTunes to Linux for free. Makes perfect sense.

    38. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the
      National Governors Association, Schwarzenegger ran as a Republican.

      According to the state of California's list of governors by party, he is a republican.

    39. Re:just wondering by soft_guy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      iTunes is a Carbon app, not a BSD app. It is not even a Cocoa app. It relies on the Carbon technology of OS X, not anything derived from BSD.

      Remember when Jobs said that OS X had two parents? Those were MacOS and NeXT (which is based on BSD)? Well, iTunes comes from MacOS roots, not NeXT roots.

      What this means is that if you were to look at the iTunes source code, it has calls in it that don't exist in BSD or Linux. It no doubt uses Carbon events and tons of QuickTime calls. QuickTime is another technology derived from MacOS.

      Porting iTunes to Linux would be at least as hard as porting to Windows was.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    40. Re:just wondering by Minderbinder106 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you tried rhythmbox a while ago but haven't lately, do yourself a favor and give it another try. It has gone from a buggy piece of crap to a top notch program in the last three months.

    41. Re:just wondering by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      Even better, I use MPlayer on the Macintosh instead of Quicktime. Why? Faster, simpler GUI, lets you take Screenshots, better controls, fullscreen mode without paying for a pro version, open source - so I know there's no spyware or big brotherness going on (a la Real, WMP, etc.), plays many many different formats, and it's geek chic.

      Where I can, I usually choose free software tools, if only to keep RMS happy so he won't drop down my chimney Christmas Eve and leave Gnu/Coal in my stocking!

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    42. Re:just wondering by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      Dude, I'm a programmer on windows and linux. I understand how X works. Unfortunately, X is very limited in the Toolkit you have available so you have to choose either the Gnome or KDE toolkits.

      I'm not just looking at this from a programmers point of view but as a user aswell. Linux needs to standardize on on window manager and GUI toolkit if they are going to succeed.

      User's don't give a damn about having a lot of choices. They want to to just work and to be compatible/interoperable.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    43. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it should be fluxbox. The rest of the WMs and especially the "desktop environments" suck (;

    44. Re:just wondering by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 0, Troll
      You can get a Desktop G4 for around $900

      And a $500 Pentium 4 machine will run rings around it...

    45. Re:just wondering by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      "This is kinda like saying it would not be hard to port Internet Explorer to DOS."
      -

      Huh? I remember running IE on WinDOS for years. It still does (95, 98, 98SE, ME)

      Oh...You meant DOS without the silly get up! My bad.

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    46. Re:just wondering by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because business desktops and engineering workstations are right in the middle of iTunes' target audience.

      Get over it. Apple is not going to do your bidding. There will be a Linux client if and when Apple percieves that to be in their interest. Right now, it's not.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    47. Re:just wondering by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It's not impossible, but there is little incentive for Apple to put the rather gargantuan effort required into porting iTunes Linux.

      I think you are accurate as far as the current state of affairs. Howevah, should Linux capture enough desktops, you can bet that Apple will want to sell the users of those desktops iPods. So it's very possible, given the opportunities for linux on the desktop in the next couple of years.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    48. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, can take your 'boxen', and shove them up your greasy ass, you fucking faggot.

    49. Re:just wondering by Kplusplus · · Score: 1

      Too bad it uses more CPU, has lower framerates, skips more and overall needs more CPU to do less work. Quicktime is awesome on the mac, it is simply in a class outside of everything else. With http://www.3ivx.com installed you Divx and Xvid movies even play back better and again with lower resource use than mplayer.

      If you think the Mplayer GUI app is good you are seriously smoking some UI crack. Mplayer's GUI is retarded and stresses a playlist over the media itself, add to that the fact that the player and controller are two seperate apps and make no real effort to hide that fact.

      That said, I too use mplayer but for reasons completely different from your own, I like the full screen controls, since it actually has them, whereas QT does not. I like the full screen gui, aka the text notifications of location and play/pause/etc. Another thing is that its launched from a terminal, and can be controlled from there too, so its usually a toss up between the controls of mplayer filename or the ease of open filename.

      Lastly QT plays more formats than mac mplayer currently because the mac version is limited to libavcodec and flac since everything else was provided through linux codecs. BTW, I said more formats, just you wont notice since mplayer plays *some* rm, and asf, wmv files which QT will never play until some OSS guru writes a codec out of the goodness of thier heart.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    50. Re:just wondering by Kplusplus · · Score: 1

      Actually it would be harder since Windows had Quicktime at least, but now they would have to write that from scratch too.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    51. Re:just wondering by fr0dicus · · Score: 1
      Given that Google Zeitgeist still puts Linux at 1% of the (web connected at least) market, and that the philosophy of those users is generally to prefer open and free software, then the financial reasons for doing this rather rapidly approaches zero.

      Apple probably expect that someone will write something so similar anyway that there is little point. Jtunes is a case in point.

    52. Re:just wondering by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1
      Apple would not make iTunes for mpg123/ALSA/whatever.

      Nitpick: They would have to use ALSA (or OSS), as that's the only way to get the sound to the sound card.
    53. Re:just wondering by Perl-Pusher · · Score: 1

      How many people bought a windows machine because it's the same one they use at work?

    54. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may have "Quicktime Support" but if it supports MPEG4, you could pretty much in a roundabout kinda way say it supports Quicktime since the standard was built from the quicktime file layout. Will it support Sorenson? Nope, but if you've got a Quicktime .mov using MPEG4 video and AAC audio, THEN you've got something going on :)

    55. Re:just wondering by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What does that have to do with Apple's interests?

      If and when Linux gets any momentum on consumer desktops it may be in Apple's interest to serve that market.

      Right now that "market" consists of a bunch of Linux geeks who will picket Apple's doorstep because iTunes isn't open source/uses the wrong window manager/took away their lollypop/peed in their Cheerios.

      Why should Apple even bother? Where is the win? What advantage would they garner?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    56. Re:just wondering by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You and the other four like-minded Linux users do not justify the tremendous expense of porting QuickTime.

      Where is Apple's interest in supporting Linux users? There aren't enough of them who buy lots of music to be worthwhile...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    57. Re:just wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can the truth be marked as a troll?

    58. Re:just wondering by Fat+Casper · · Score: 1
      To me that means Apple should refuse, now more than ever, to release Quicktime for Linux since that would only help Linux grab and extend it's lead. The good news for Apple is that Linux is only taking market rank from it, not market share...

      Apple doesn't care about market rank, nor market share. They care about gross sales. Offering new products into new market segments will increase that, and may even have the cross-pollenating effect of getting some Linux fanatics to buy Macs. OSX is a kind of BSD, so it will still support a kind of religious fervor. Quicktime for Linux can only be a smart move for Apple.

      [grammar nazi]While we're on smart moves, leave the apostrophe out of it's when it's not called for. I don't think you write hi's or her's, our's or their's, so why it's?[/grammar nazi]

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    59. Re:just wondering by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, Adobe could write Photoshop for some random distro, whichever one they choose, and that distro could become the de facto standard linux distro for graphics professionals weary of closed-source operating systems.

      Now we just need to find all the graphics professionals who are weary of closed-source operating systems, but still willing to pay $750 for a closed-source graphics suite...

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  8. Worthless by mackman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're going to post release notices on /. there either needs to be compelling new features (which should appear in the /. article) or it needs to be the reslease of Duke Nukem Forever.

    1. Re:Worthless by Autumnmist · · Score: 2, Informative

      Changelog of some sort? Or at least some news about improved stability/speed/performance or new features? Anyone?

      --
      --- "Many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." ~ Ben Kenobi, 'Return of the Jedi'
    2. Re:Worthless by RumpRoast · · Score: 0

      Actually an entirely separate front page section with recent software releases would be a pretty cool thing. Certainly a dot-something release of Quicktime is of questionable newsworthiness.

      --

      My Ass hurts.
    3. Re:Worthless by radicalskeptic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here you go, I don't know if it is detailed enough, but it has more info.
      Quicktime info

      iTunes info

      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    4. Re:Worthless by FattMattP · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually an entirely separate front page section with recent software releases would be a pretty cool thing.
      It already exists right here. It and slashdot are even part of the same family.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    5. Re:Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an APPLE update, how dare you insult apple you HERETIC

    6. Re:Worthless by pavon · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Worthless by RumpRoast · · Score: 0

      That's only open source stuff at Freshmeat. If MS service packs and Quicktime are front page worthy, you'd think they'd include that stuff too. The kernel release too, for that matter.

      --

      My Ass hurts.
    8. Re:Worthless by deadcasuals · · Score: 1

      If you're going to post release notices on /. there either needs to be compelling new features (which should appear in the /. article) or it needs to be the reslease of Duke Nukem Forever.

      DukeNukem Forever is hardly a point release... It's a sign of The Apocalypse!

      Users are Losers. - Nancy Reagan

    9. Re:Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, but, Apple is open source. Steve says so.

    10. Re:Worthless by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      well, there's always VersionTracker

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  9. AOL integration, too by radicalskeptic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now people with AOL can just use their screen name to buy songs on iTMS, and it'll be billed to their AOL account.
    ...
    Not that I would know personally now!! I read it on the website, I swear!

    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    1. Re:AOL integration, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh dear god. There will now be a ring of aol script kitty music downloaders...

      Get someone's sn/pw and download $2000 worth of music just to piss them off....

  10. I'll use itunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    when it plays ogg, runs on linux, is devoid of patents, is open source, is GPLed and can first post for me.

    1. Re:I'll use itunes by ejunek · · Score: 5, Informative

      In all seriousness, there seems to be some misconception that iTunes can't play ogg files. Well, I'm not sure about on the PC, but there is a plugin for the Mac that plays ogg files just fine.

    2. Re:I'll use itunes by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Informative

      In all seriousness, there seems to be some misconception that windows-iTunes can't play ogg files. Well, I'm not sure about the parrent, but I know that there is an open source plugin for windows-Quicktime that plays ogg files just fine.

      --
      "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    3. Re:I'll use itunes by gss · · Score: 1

      it would be easier to just say "when hell freezes over"

    4. Re:I'll use itunes by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      In all seriousness, there seems to be some misconception that iTunes can't play ogg files. Well, I'm not sure about on the the Mac or the PC, but there is a plugin for Amiga that. . . .no, wait. Damn!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:I'll use itunes by Quixotic · · Score: 1

      except the last time i tried the windows ogg plugin, it was dog slow, and had serious performance issues.....

      --
      --
  11. One word by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    way-too-confusing.

    Ok, one expression.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Some more detailed information: by radicalskeptic · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    1. Re:Some more detailed information: by bogie · · Score: 1

      /Sarcastic but serious mode on/

      Is this the release of Quicktime that A) doesn't run like a craPpy Port b) actually looks like a Windows app?

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  13. ITunes in UK by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 1

    iTunes 4.2 isn't showing up in software update for me. I wonder if it's only available in the US, since it's a music store update?

    --
    MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
    1. Re:ITunes in UK by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 1

      D'oh my bad, I just RTFA. It's not been a good day!

      --
      MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
    2. Re:ITunes in UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't show up on my computer either, and i'm to lazy to RTFA...

  14. So... by phreak03 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here are the "new" features.
    For itunes, you can now use your aol login, and aol
    wallet to pay for stuff.

    Quicktime now supports the 3GPP and 3GPP2 standards
    These standards are usefull for Third generation cell phones. They allow transfer of scalled video, sound, text, and just about anything as the yare track based formats.

    (anyone know if the itunes breaks the support for mytunes <www.cowpimp.com> the program that lets you download thru mytumes)**

    --
    come comment on the madness at http://slashdot.org/~phreak03/journal/
    1. Re:So... by markclong · · Score: 1

      Mytunes works fine with the new iTunes. I just tried it out.

  15. and 10.3.2 by scrotch · · Score: 4, Informative


    A new Panther update - to 10.3.2 - is also available from SoftwareUpdate.

    hopefully I can finish downloading it before it gets apple-slashdotted...

    1. Re:and 10.3.2 by scrotch · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:and 10.3.2 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've been reading on some other forums that the new Panther update is increasing the battery life of iBooks and Powerbooks by about an hour. That, right there, is Apple's ability to control its hardware and software together.

    3. Re:and 10.3.2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopefully I can finish downloading it before it gets apple-slashdotted...

      Apple's stuff is hosted by Akamai. There is no way a site with as small a userbase as Slashdot could bring it down.

    4. Re:and 10.3.2 by phillyclaude · · Score: 1

      heh right. Apple uses akamai servers. If we can slashdot that, I will be throughly amazed.

      --
      A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
  16. jTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a good java clone of iTunes complete with Rendezvous support.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/jtunes4/

    1. Re:jTunes by transient · · Score: 1

      I think Apple's going to have a thing or two to say about them stealing all of iTunes' images.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    2. Re:jTunes by ReadParse · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sorry, I couldn't help but notice that you used "java" and "good" in the same sentence. Just wanted to let you know, and I'm sure it won't happen again.

      RP

    3. Re:jTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      Sorry but he's right, whether considered a troll or not. There are very few to zero 'good' Java applications. It just can't happen.

      Writing application = not using Java.

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Re:MP3 not AAC? by hpavc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes with the lame plugin

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  19. Re:I can almost taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure it's not the guys you picked up blowing their loads on your face?

  20. Re:Also updated today.... by terminal.dk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Non-unix based ?

    Do you know what Mac OS X is ? It is a Window manager running on top of an open source OpenBSD dialect called Darwin. See www.opendarwin.org.

    If Mac OS X is not unix, neither are OpenBSD and Linux.

  21. File-Type Associations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you install QuickTime 6.5, will it change all your file-type associations and over-ride attempts to change them back? Like previous versions...?

    1. Re:File-Type Associations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Why oh why did microsoft not use part of windows to change file associations, so that if a program tried to change one, it would prompt you to make sure it was ok...

      That would have been smart, but oh well.

  22. well i guess its important.. by Suppafly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If we are going to keep up with every point release of apache, bsd, linux kernel, etc.. we might as well start keeping track of point release updates of quicktime and itunes as well..

    1. Re:well i guess its important.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if that's all that this website is going to be for, then I'm heading over to VersionTracker.com and be done with it.

  23. Santa are you reading this? by state*less · · Score: 1

    The new iTunes Gift Certificates are a great idea. College kids can easily fire off a email to mom n' pop and have them pick one up. No wading through lines at the store, no problem.

    Put your money where your mouth is

    1. Re:Santa are you reading this? by scifience · · Score: 1

      The new gift certificates have been around since 4.1, if I'm not mistaken.

    2. Re:Santa are you reading this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean iTunes GifT CerTificaTes.

  24. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when were iTunes/QT considered to be non-unix based software?

    With the exception of the Windows version of iTunes, both it and QT are very much "unix" based software; as is everything else that runs on OSX natively.

  25. Re:Also updated today.... by TheViffer · · Score: 5, Informative

    >A non-unix based software program

    Ummm ....

    Non-Unix Operating system?

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  26. Here's what's new in QT 6.5 by savetz · · Score: 4, Informative

    QuickTime 6.5 delivers a number of new features and important updates, including:
    - Creation and playback of mobile multimedia in the new 3GPP2 format.
    - Creation and playback of mobile multimedia in the popular AMC format.
    - Improved text track support.
    - Enhanced DV playback options.
    - Enhanced support for iMovie, iDVD, and Final Cut Pro.

    1. Re:Here's what's new in QT 6.5 by alfredo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Undocumented features
      -Paris Hilton's greatest hits video
      -Special Cowboy Neil skin
      -pouring piss out of a boot tutorial
      -Ten reasons why there is no Linux version

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    2. Re:Here's what's new in QT 6.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > - Creation and playback of mobile multimedia in the new 3GPP2 format.

      In the Soviet Russia a man who invented that kind of a name would be shot...

      > - Creation and playback of mobile multimedia in the popular AMC format.

      Popular AMC format?! Never heard...

    3. Re:Here's what's new in QT 6.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm honestly sick of all these fucking QT updates. Most are close to 20MB and they do absolutely nothing. And if I decide not to update it, Software Update keeps saying "Are you sure? No really, ARE YOU SURE? I'll not let you leave this program till you confirm this 4 times."

      Arrrgh. Fucking waste of bandwidth (yeah both my post and the download).

  27. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [endless:~] evil_twin% uname -a
    Darwin endless.local 7.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.2.0: Thu Dec 11 16:20:23 PST 2003; root:xnu/xnu-517.3.7.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc

    How strange, it certainly looked like a Unix to me.

  28. Updating iTunes by Gilesx · · Score: 1

    "available by Apple's Site and Software Update (respectively)."

    Hmmm when I opened up iTunes, it told me there was an update available and just redirected me to the website. Too bad it couldn't do a "real" software update - opening a web browser and sending you to the download page to download it manually seems a little clunky to me.

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:Updating iTunes by ragnar · · Score: 1

      In my day, we had to install software on floppy disk. And we liked it!

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    2. Re:Updating iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck floppies, in my day you didn't have to install, you just loaded it right off the tape.

  29. Re:Also updated today.... by grub · · Score: 1

    s/OpenBSD/Mach (with some FreeBSD goo)/g

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  30. Re:Also updated today.... by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Same reason every tiny (.z) point release of Linux is front page news here - because the Geek Collective has deemed it cool.

    Maybe it is, maybe it isn't - but it definitely isn't "stuff that matters".

  31. Re:A request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Complain about an Apple product?
    Instead, you will get replies from zealots trying to justify a possible Apple position for not having a Linux version. Apple is never wrong, the users with issues are the problem.

  32. good job... by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You've basically summed up why a lot of good commercial software doesn't exists for linux. Photoshop anyone? This isn't meant to be a troll, but he makes the point that companies want to release closed source software without jumping through hurdles. However, this is not an attack on Linux, but more so on the distros for not agreeing on standards. Make standards, then compete. This is why people hate internet explorer so much, it broke away from standards and tried to make the www a microsoft application.

    But I'm not trying to be negative, things are improving...

    1. Re:good job... by moongha · · Score: 1

      Exactly which professional industry makes significant use of GIMP?

    2. Re:good job... by SeanAhern · · Score: 1

      The Hollywood filmmaking industry. They used it on Harry Potter, Scooby-Doo, Stuart Little, etc.

    3. Re:good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      things are improving
      That depends on your point of view. GNU/Linux is (was?) a different culture from the win32 crowd. GNU wants to revolutionise computing for the benefit of mankind (no really.). You seem to want to swap your kernel and keep your apps. But then this is a Pro-closed-source article/pr - it seems that way because the free software movement declares war on a current convention.
    4. Re:good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Consulting Programmer for Hire" industry, apparently...

    5. Re:good job... by fungai · · Score: 1

      No mod points, so a reply is in order.

      You're 100% correct. Binary compatibility in Linux is a major PITA. In an ideal world all software would be OSS, and you could compile it for your platform and it would work. However, on real projects some proprietry software may be needed, and there's nothing much you can do about it. Just this week I tried to install eDirectory 8.7.1 on RHAS3, and it core'd the whole time. Would it have been so difficult to keep binary compatibility between RHAS2.1 and RHAS3?

    6. Re:good job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used "vi" on all those movies, too, you schmuck. Movies are big jobs. They use every piece of software to make a movie. Saying "they used Software X to make Movie Y" means nothing at all, as all the morons who climbed on the LOTR bandwagon a couple of years ago learned the hard way.

  33. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Final Cut
    Applescript
    Panther
    DVD Studio Pro
    Soundtrack
    Apple Remote Desktop
    WebObjects
    Keynote

    tolls are so annoying ):

  34. Re:How come by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bzzzzt! So sorry!

    iChat
    iPhoto
    Final Cut
    Keynote
    DVD Studio
    Soundtrack
    WebObjects
    Streaming Server
    Broadcaster
    Remote Desktop
    AppleScript
    Panther

    Not to mention the hardware:

    AirPort Extreme
    iSight

    No problems with lowercase t -- in fact, I daresay the opposite is the case. :)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  35. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That appears to have been fixed, though the fix might have affected the 'p' key.

  36. Help for you by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, here's a hint - If you load iTunes and hit that button that looks liek a triangle on its side - you can now play your "worthless" AAC files!

    Man that must have been frustrating downloading all those songs and not knowing what to do next. Once you learn this "triangle trick" you might find you are able to play music on all sorts of things you couldn't before!! Those shiny discs at Target? They all have music on them as well as it turns out, once you slip them into that funny looking box in the middle of your car that until now has only emitted the tortured sounds of radio DJ's.

    No need to thank me for opening the wide world of music to you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Help for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like a triangle on its side....that's funny

    2. Re:Help for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the AC meant AAC is useless as in non-share-able, can't play in non-iPod mp3 players, etc.

    3. Re:Help for you by TheUser0x58 · · Score: 1
      In Software Update (on OS X v10.3.2), an XCode update also shows up:
      The Xcode 1.1 Update provides overall stability and performance enhancements to Xcode IDE, as well as improvements to debugging, workflow, the Xcode build system and CodeSense. It is recommended that all Xcode users install this update.
      Thats some changelog... By the way, does anyone know if 10.2.3 has fixed the buffer overflow found the other day?
      --
      -- listen to interesting music, support independent radio... WPRB
    4. Re:Help for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a hint: a triangle on its side is... *drumroll* a triangle.

  37. Fullscreen is a feature by t_allardyce · · Score: 0

    My brother got a nice expensive Apple notebook only to discover that playing video in full screen on quicktime was feature you had to pay extra for! needless to say, one crack later and my respect for apple went down. I wonder if this wonderous feature is free yet?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by OmniVector · · Score: 4, Informative

      i know. i hate apple! it's not like you can't find any free alternatives with fullscreen built in that even play more media formats by default.

      --
      - tristan
    2. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by clifyt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Quicktime ***PLAYER*** won't allow it to play in fullscreen. Its a minor annoyance, one that doesn't bother anyone, and is designed to allow the much beleagered (did I get it right) and always on the verge of bankruptcy company to collect cash so Microsoft won't have to 'bail them out' again. I think I summed up all the generally Apple conspiracies :-)

      But, with a simple legal download, one that doesn't require a crack, one can get another media player that runs pretty much as yet another quicktime skin, and you can get fullscreen for free. I'm surprised your brother decided he had to break a licensing agreement to get this.

      I on the other hand, felt $29 was a steal for QTPro and picked it up without giving it a second thought.

    3. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or make a 7-line AppleScript

      on open fileName
      tell application "QuickTime Player"
      activate
      open fileName
      present movie 1
      end tell
      end open

      Drag a movie onto the script icon and it plays full screen.

      Idiot.

    4. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fullscreen is a perk so is being able to save webclips off the web etc.

      The real power of QuickTime is the video transcoding... This new release that I am downloading better be able to handled muxed video and audio in an mpeg stream... talk about driving me insane.

    5. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by commodoresloat · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Idiot.

      Yeah, I can't imagine someone could be so stupid as to not have figured that out themselves; it's one of those things that is so obvious that Apple doesn't need to document it.

      Oh, I'm sorry, I just realized that was your sig.

    6. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm sorry, I just realized that was your sig.

      Idiot. :-P

    7. Re:Fullscreen is a feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, it is documented. Dragging an application to the Script Editor will reveal all the commands available for AppleScript with a description of what they do.

      AppleScript is just one of those nice things that make using a computer less of a drag when you're trying to get real work done. Get a Mac and you'll understand.

  38. WAHOO! by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

    Another 50 megs to download! Yippee!

    1. Re:WAHOO! by Funksaw · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're on a dial up, keep in mind that these aren't exactly "must have" updates if you're not an AOL customer. 50 megs is alot, but let's face it, you can easily wait till 10.4. The only stuff you really NEED are the security updates.

      And since you can set this thing to download overnight, unless you're so rural as to be paying toll-calls to a dialup ISP, 50 megs can be done in 1 or 2 nights, since Apple Update supports resuming (TTBOMR)

      -- Funksaw

    2. Re:WAHOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QuickTime 6.5 is included with iTunes 4.2.

      But if you want to download them twice, go nuts.

  39. Still waiting... by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

    for them to get a deal going to Canadians can use it, too.

    Without having to go through the hassle of getting a US PO Box and having a credit card registered to it, requiring a monthly drive across the border, costing time and money spent on gas and food.

    1. Re:Still waiting... by Gilesx · · Score: 1

      Is there any way you can set up a PO Box on line? I just need an address to use as an alternative address with my credit card company and then I can sign up....

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    2. Re:Still waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mail Drop Guide

      use their advanced search, then specify only results with web sites

    3. Re:Still waiting... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      And then when the US government sees a foreign national using a fake address for financial transactions you'll get yourself labelled a terrorist and you'll be kidnapped in the middle of the night and sent to Cuba.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Still waiting... by Gilesx · · Score: 1

      And then when the US government sees a foreign national using a fake address for financial transactions you'll get yourself labelled a terrorist and you'll be kidnapped in the middle of the night and sent to Cuba.

      I could use a vacation :)

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    5. Re:Still waiting... by mcwop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't get it becuase the songs cost .99 cents U.S., which is $1.31598 Canadian as of today. Imgaine the nightmare of that marketing campaign.

      --

      "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    6. Re:Still waiting... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Jobs has a keynote at MacWorld on 6th Jan. Anything with as much PR value as a new country coming online with iTMS wouldn't be slipped out quietly now. He'll have a few things to announce then. You might get lucky.

  40. WTF?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This question comes up in every article here about OS X software, and I can't believe you've missed the answer each time.

    Most OS X software consists of very little that could be easily ported to other UNIX systems since it relies heavily on OS components that are only in OS X.

  41. almost unrelated Quicktime question by titaniam · · Score: 1

    I just bought a camera yesterday that outputs quicktime movies but I don't want to download that real player or quicktime player crap. Question: What is the most portable video format and how can I convert my movies to that format? I am looking for the movie equivalents of the .jpg format and linux convert program. This is for the convenience of all the people who will eventually download my movies - I don't want to force them to use a proprietary product. Thanks a bunch. Either answer me here or email me at pa@drpa.us.

    1. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I am looking for the movie equivalents of the .jpg format

      Well, MPEG (MPEG-1 to be specific) would be that format. And it doesn't require much CPU to decode either (an old 233MMX would do that easily, perhaps even a non-MMX Pentium 166).

      352x240 at 30fps MPEG-1 with MPEG Layer II audio. Use the "VideoCD" setting, with a *really good* encoder, the quality is a bit better than VHS.

      All recent (1995+) operating systems should be able to play .mpg files natively (Win95, MacOS9, Irix, Linux, BSD, etc)

    2. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      That's what the mpeg formats are for, from roughly the same guys who brought you the jpeg format. Either the one, two or four version will be fairly portable.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    3. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by mcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MPEG, and if you pay the 30 dollars for Quicktime Pro Quicktime should be able to export to MPEG from any format it plays for you, i'm pretty sure.

    4. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by pittnat · · Score: 1

      i am pretty sure that mplayer will handle quicktime movies...

    5. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

      really doesnt answer his question about saving people who download his movies from needing a non-standard player. I'd say mpeg or DivX. DivX isn't really standard, so to speak, but practiaclly everyone already has it so they can watch their downloaded movies and spite the MPAA

      --
      TIAEAE!
    6. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by denzombie · · Score: 1
      FYI

      QuickTime Pro only exports the video. It will not separate muxed audio/video streams. Especially nifty for silent movies.

      You need to demux it, QT Pro won't do it for you.

      Of this I am sure.

      --
      --- Evil robots don't kill people, Mad scientists kill people.
    7. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mplayer does handle QT (and you'll want to install w32-codecs for full support).

      Plus, mencoder can convert QT to AVI and a few other formats.

  42. iTunes 4.2 not on Software Update yet by dafz1 · · Score: 1

    However, if you go here, you can download the installer package for iTunes 4.2(Mac and Windows).

  43. Re:A request... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? Everyone here knows it WON'T happen. Anytime soon anyway, and certainly not in a .x release.

    Why not save the Linux comment until the day it does happen?

  44. Re:I can almost taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could be. I was using my lavender iMac at the time.

  45. Re:How come by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 1

    McIntosh - lower case 't'

    Actually, it's Macintosh, with a lower case 'i' and an 'a' between the 'M' and the 'c'. After 20 years, I'm surprised to see people still get the name consistantly wrong.

  46. Then prove it. by Paradox · · Score: 1

    Err,

    This comment suggests that Apple IS wrong in not releasing a Linux version of this software. If you're going to make such a large statement, you should back it up with reasoning.

    Or at least link to someone else's reasoning. Sheesh.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    1. Re:Then prove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Linux arguably has a larger installed base of desktop users than Apple. And even if it doesn't, why does Apple support Windows, which is made by a company actively trying to destroy them, but not Linux, from which they have gotten so much free software for their own platform?


      The fact is, I used to think my next computer would be a Mac running OS X, but with a company like Apple behind it, I've reconsidered.

    2. Re:Then prove it. by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Linux arguably has a larger installed base of desktop users than Apple

      Highly doubtful. And even if this *was* the case, due to the fact that Mac OS X comes with iTunes, the majority of Mac users also use iTunes. If a Linux version were to be released, there's no reason for us to believe, apart from possibly facilitating uploading to an iPod, that even a fraction of Linux users would choose iTunes.

      I hardly think it's the case that Apple "supports" Windows. I think it's more like Apple is trying to make its product (the iPod) available to as large an audience as possible in as convenient a fashion as they can manage, and seeing as the majority of computer users are Windows users, this seems like a sound marketing strategy to me.

      I've come to the conclusion that due to the diversity of Linux (which is one of its so called strengths), in terms of things like GUIs, DEs, distros, etc..., the lack of standardization makes it virtually impossible for a company to provide a product, along with support, for Linux users. There's just too many inconsistencies from one distro and desktop to the next. And I think it's likely that even if Apple did release a version of iTunes that relied on, say, Qt, then you'd hear griping from the GTK+ community as to why Apple didn't support GTK+.

      Personally, I'd highly recommend your next computer being a Mac running OS X. I'm typing this from my new PowerBook (which I've had for about a week now) and I'm loving it. I used to be a Linux advocate, but with the release of OS X, I'm not looking back (well, except for servers). My opinion is that Mac OS X is not without its faults, but it has far fewer faults than Linux or Windows... and it's just such a relief to play with applications that are usable and have been designed with the intention of being usable, unlike nightmares like the GIMP (powerful, but impossible for an amateur to accomplish the simplest tasks as I can attest to) or the KDE control panel (the most convoluted thing I've ever seen in my life).

    3. Re:Then prove it. by Luke727 · · Score: 0

      I've come to the conclusion that due to the diversity of Linux (which is one of its so called strengths), in terms of things like GUIs, DEs, distros, etc..., the lack of standardization makes it virtually impossible for a company to provide a product, along with support, for Linux users. There's just too many inconsistencies from one distro and desktop to the next. And I think it's likely that even if Apple did release a version of iTunes that relied on, say, Qt, then you'd hear griping from the GTK+ community as to why Apple didn't support GTK+.

      Bingo! You are the first Linux user with a clue! You win a free trolling!

      OMG vorpal^ IS ON TEH SPOKE!!!!11oneone!!11!!!!

      On a side note, I think it's kind of ironic that Linux users always talk about open standards, but the absolute lack of a standard way of doing things across multiple distributions of Linux is the very thing that is hurting it the most! In fact, I would venture as far to say that the competition between different open source solutions is harsher than that between open source (in general) and commercial products. I mean Microsoft vs Linux is BORING. Qt vs GTK+, or even better KDE vs Gnome, is EXCITING!

      --
      If you find this post offensive, don't read it! THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING! I am what I am because of how apes behave.
    4. Re:Then prove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because Linux users don't pay for shit but most Windows users are used to being gouged?

    5. Re:Then prove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the lack of standardization makes it virtually impossible for a company to provide a product, along with support, for Linux users.


      That's a load of crap. There are a huge number of companies that provide both closed and open source products for Linux, with support (and that list is just the tip of the iceberg).


      I have come to the conclusion that Apple does not release a Linux QT client because they view Linux as a threat that can be safely ignored with little public backlash. It is this Microsoftian-arrogance that pisses me off to no end about them. They have gotten so much free code and good will from the open source community and yet they still insist on making it that much more difficult for Linux users to be able to do something as basic as watch their "exclusive" movie trailers. Until Apple's attitude towards Linux users changes, I certainly won't be sending them any of my money.

    6. Re:Then prove it. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I've come to the conclusion that due to the diversity of Linux (which is one of its so called strengths), in terms of things like GUIs, DEs, distros, etc..., the lack of standardization makes it virtually impossible for a company to provide a product, along with support, for Linux users.

      There is an exception to this. Workstations (which I define here as computers with a more or less dedicated purpose) can be well supported even on Linux. Basically, the vendor chooses a Linux distribution (and maybe even hardware), and because the software is so important to its users, you buy the right distribution and hardware. Examples of these would be artist workstations (audio, graphics, video), and possibly even software developer platforms. A general purpose application like StarOffice would have a much harder time dictating platform requirements to its users.

    7. Re:Then prove it. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      That's a load of crap. There are a huge number of companies that provide both closed and open source products for Linux, with support (and that list is just the tip of the iceberg).

      How many of those support several distributions? If you look at Maya, for example, it requires "RedHat(TM) Linux(R) 7.3 or 8.0". SoftImage 3D requires "Red Hat Linux 7.1 or 7.2". Mathematica wants "Red Hat 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, 9.0, or equivalent." Some others simply list "Linux." An already small market is further fragmented by incompatible distributions.

      Point is, if the "System Requirements" section of a product simply says "Linux", how likely is it to work on every major (feel free to define "major") current version Linux distribution? We're talking about a market that even Red Hat gave up on.

      MacOS X, in comparison, has three major versions. There's little reason for anybody to stay at 10.0, because 10.1 is a free upgrade. 10.2 and 10.3 are both backward compatible to some degree, and despite Apple's nasty habit of breaking old software in new OS versions, updated applications usually can still work in older OS versions. Though the market is small, a developer can target the entire MacOS X share.

  47. New update coming soon by rnd() · · Score: 1

    The installer is now a web-based installer package, the kind Apple has been using for Quicktime for a while.

    I have installed the last couple of iTunes updates without any problems, but this one encountered a number of errors.

    It forced a restart, so we'll see how it turns out.

    The point: I think there will be another release fairly soon to fix this problem. You may want to hold off on this update until then.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  48. Re:How come by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
    tolls are so annoying ):

    Tell me about it, every time i drive to new york I spend like 40$. And add the attitude of the toll booth operators outside lincoln tunnel. Seriously people tolls are indeed annoying.

    On sidenote, it would also help if apple keyboards were to have the R key.

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  49. Re: This ain't even news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does Apple deserve a news posting about a version upgrade to their software? I demand equal "air" time to Winamp, Sonique, Windows media Player, Real Player, DivX, etc, etc, etc every time they patch their software.

  50. Re:A request... by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could we tack on the end of these little iTunes stories that no Linux version is available still? Thanks.

    Why should we do that when you're doing such a good job?

  51. Actually, it really is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are a few workalikes I've found on sourceforge:

    iTunes 2.0 for Mac:
    #!/bin/sh
    rm -rf /

    iTunes for Windows:
    #!/bin/sh
    rm -rf /boot

  52. what? by microcars · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...hit that button that looks liek(sic) a triangle on its side...

    ???

    What does a Triangle on its side look like anyways?

    I don't see a button that looks like this: -

    --
    I like microcars
    1. Re:what? by Derang() · · Score: 1

      I believe thats called the "Play Button"

  53. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also released today ...

    A new Linux kernel. Which one of these two do you think more people care about?

  54. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually has a name, it's called Camel case (that should be CamelCase). Tends to be a US thing about making trademarkable names by bolting two other words together; PowerPoint, FrontPage, etc. etc.

    QuickTime is CamelCase, iTunes is just some weird shit Steve Jobs (iSteveJobs?) came up with.

    Point in question though; how come at the height of the .com boom, we had @everything, iEverything and eEverything, yet for some bloody annoying reason, Apple get away with it and no one is going "your product names suck"?

  55. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >
    >Non-Unix Operating system?
    >

    Ummmm ....

    Not according to the Open Group which owns the trademark.

    --AC

  56. Proxy by SenorFluffyPants · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if 4.2 allows the music store to work from behind a proxy that requires authentication?

  57. "Now Playing" plugin by Some+guy+named+Chris · · Score: 0

    Has someone found a "Now Playing" type plugin for iTunes? I've searched google, and found several examples for the Mac version, but not the Windows version.

    I suppose I could shake the dust off my C skills and get the visual plugin development kit, and code my own, but frankly, I've been spoiled by scripting languages.

    1. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Not sure if it's what you're talking about - but Konfabulator may have what you want. www.konfabulator.com

      Tons of iTunes related apps. Great program anyways...

    2. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by Some+guy+named+Chris · · Score: 1

      What I'm talking is this: I need (want) something that will log what the current playing song is to either a text file or http post it to a URL.

      It looks like Konfabulator is only for MacOSX, but thanks for the link!

    3. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by lotsofno · · Score: 1

      the new winamp 5 has a bundled in feature like this, which pops up a little bubble from the bottom right of your taskbar i think, announcing the new track, from what i've heard.

    4. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by Samhaine · · Score: 1

      There's a Currently Playing plugin which will show Artist and Title as inactive menu options on the tray right click menu. That's all I've found so far (I do not remember where I got it from, however. :( )

    5. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by Some+guy+named+Chris · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I've bought too much music from the Apple store consider switching to WinAmp right now.

      My purpose for this is to update my blog automagically with what I'm currently listening to. I've downloaded the Apple iTunes SDK, and am actually resorting to scratching my own itch.

    6. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone else be interested in what you are listening to?

    7. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by RoadChris · · Score: 1

      A blog is inherently narcisistic, but that said, it serves as conversatipn fodder. Suppose you are my friend, checking up on me, and you see I've recently been listening to a lot of Victor Wooten. You, being a huge bass fan, might want to recommend a CD you love that has James Jamerson on it.

      There already exists such a plug-in from Microsoft for Windows Media Player, so it isn't that strange a request.

      I imagine you weren't really interested in why, though, and were just loking to yank my chain. That's ok. Need a hug?

    8. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I imagine you weren't really interested in why, though, and were just loking to yank my chain. It was indeed a rhetorical question. I'm not a big fan of blog sites because it tends to reduce the signal to noise ratio of web searches. And I'm quite convinced most of them are a write only medium. Witness the number of them that are updated for a few days, then abandoned. Need a hug? It's not one of "those" blogs is it?

    9. Re:"Now Playing" plugin by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Bah, a real music fan knows what song he's listening to in the first 3 seconds.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  58. So what are 3GPP2 and AMC formats? by sjonke · · Score: 1

    For those of us less informed, what are 3GPP2 and AMC formats? What uses them?

    --
    --- What?
    1. Re:So what are 3GPP2 and AMC formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3GPP2: I am pretty sure that my nokia records video in that format. This is a big update for me as Nokia only offers a stupid windows media player. These 3GPP2 files are pretty nicely compressed as well(but the quality is pretty crappy).

    2. Re:So what are 3GPP2 and AMC formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weirdos from the future man...

      Evidently - just like with MP4 - Apple have some kind of cool time travel technology that enables them to find out what we'll be using in the future and integrate it now!

    3. Re:So what are 3GPP2 and AMC formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo Mamma uses AMC!

  59. Does this mean that... by line.at.infinity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apple disabled QTFairUse?

  60. Breaking news from the math frontier... by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists have figured out how to sucessfully reconstruct a circle given only two points.

    And some other, related headlines...

    Slashdot moderators continue to consume crack in mass quantities.

    The parent post is decidedly not funny.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  61. Wal-Mart Launches $0.88 Download Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    In other news, Wal-Mart has begun testing of its new 88-cent-per-song online music service. The site will be formally launched in 2004.

    The songs will be in WMA (Windows Media audio) format, and according to Walmart.com spokeswoman Cynthia Lin, the site will abide by the same content format as found on CD racks in Wal-Mart stores, which don't sell music with content the company deems offensive. On the website, the company notes that some songs are flagged as "edited" to denote a song was recorded without offensive lyrics.

    Censored music. Yuck! Why don't they just let the listener decide what is and what isn't appropriate? Shesh!

    1. Re:Wal-Mart Launches $0.88 Download Service by Etcetera · · Score: 0, Troll


      Censored music. Yuck! Why don't they just let the listener decide what is and what isn't appropriate? Shesh!

      They do. You can opt to purchase your music elsewhere.

      IT'S ONLY CENSORSHIP WHEN THE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTS SPEECH, Mr. Wolf-cryer.

      Speaking as someone who's DJ'd before and tried forever to search for "clean", radio versions, of songs to play at HS-type dances, I can say that there are definitely some people who actively search for the clean material. They like the groove of Snoop Dogg's "What's My Name", but can deal without the constant swearing and other ghettoness.

      To each their own.

    2. Re:Wal-Mart Launches $0.88 Download Service by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IT'S ONLY CENSORSHIP WHEN THE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTS SPEECH, Mr. Wolf-cryer.

      So if your ISP starts blocking web sites they disagree with, it isn't censorship? If your local tv station blanks out part of a show they deem inappropriate, it isn't censorship? After all, they aren't the government.

      I will agree that Walmart is in their rights to sell only certain versions, as long as they post this fact. But that doesn't change the fact that it can be the start of a long slippery slope.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    3. Re:Wal-Mart Launches $0.88 Download Service by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      IT'S ONLY CENSORSHIP WHEN THE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTS SPEECH, Mr. Wolf-cryer.

      It's a common mistake, but it is absolutely not true. For example, no author writing about the Hays' code (ruling Hollywood in the years of 1934-1966) has any problem with calling it "censorship" - while it was actually imposed by association of private companies, today known as the MPAA. Government had nothing to do with that - but if it effectively kills the freedom of speech (and that's exactly what the Hays' code did) - it is censorship. If you are interested in that subject, I can recommend you some scholarly publications about the censorship of Hollywood classics like "East Of Eden" or "From Here To Eternity".

      Even in the communist states, censorship was not always enforced by the government. For example, in the post-Soviet invasion Czechoslovakia there was no government-enforced censorship of press. You don't need a government censorship if you can remove any dissident from his job at the university or a newspaper and make him work at a coal mine just by a snap of your fingers (those brave Czech authors, who tried to use their freedom of speech after the Soviet invasion, soon ended up working as janitors, like Vaclav Havel). It would be exagerating a bit to say, that American artists face similar choices (use your freedom of speech and work at McDonald's or... accept the terms of MPAA/RIAA), but actually only a bit.

      Next time, if anyone tells you that "it's not censorship because it's not made by the government", just give him two words: Vaclav Havel.

  62. Update spree by krray · · Score: 3, Informative

    With the recent up to 10.1.3 the application load time has gotten even _faster_ (among other things :). Now these updates. It's usually FUN to update the Mac the see what's new.

    Throw in the Linux 2.6 kernel and it's going to be a fun Christmas.

    Isn't it ironical that at the same time I'm dreading the next Windows update that is always coming down the pike (being the sysadmin over seeing all such systems on the network :).

    At least Apple makes this SEEM fun. New in the iTunes application menu -- a link to:
    HotTips

  63. iTunes is the Devil by ilikeitraw · · Score: 0, Informative

    check it out: iTunes sucks !

    1. Re:iTunes is the Devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rainforests are the DEVIL!
      We've got to kill the DEVIL!
      We gotta pull out all the stops!
      And hire way more cops!
      DAMN TREES! DAMN TREES!

      --Mindy and Sky, SNL

    2. Re:iTunes is the Devil by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Wait a second, as I understand it, iTunes Music Store also sells music from independent, non-RIAA labels, including some which give a substantially larger cut to the artists. I think iTunes has its flaws, but it's hardly fair to blame them for the fact that there is demand for music sold by RIAA-member labels. I agree the "system" of the RIAA sucks and is exploitative, but it's an exploitation the artists willingly buy into in exchange for access to radio station play, promotional dollars and the perks and advances you get with a big name record label.


      Blaming Apple for this system is crazy - it's a shitty system, but there's plenty of blame to go around. I'd rather buy music legally from good bands that put effort into making quality albums where I get my moneys worth, whether I buy online or at stores, and focus my effort on defeating the unconstitutional measures the entertainment industry has supported (the DMCA for example) to keep their monopoly and prevent me from using the music that I already legally bought.

    3. Re:iTunes is the Devil by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I applaud DownHillBattle for their efforts, their efforts seem to be largely composed of swinging a big mase around, hoping they hit something they should, and hoping no one notices when they hit something they shouldn't. DHB is correct, for example, in that the iTMS is built on the RIAA's terms, and helps the RIAA a bit in that way, but they also make several arguable/incorrect statements about things such as AAC compression, and how Apple gets such a large share of the sale(remember, Apple isn't making any money on the iTMS, their share pays for the bandwidth, the CC transaction, and just barely supporting the store itself). Their "solution" isn't doing their cause much good either, asking Apple to list the artist's share of the sale(something not possible, Apple has agreements with the label, not the artist; the label gets to dicate the share and doesn't have to tell a soul), and encouraging users to instead using things like Poisioned(an OSS Kazaa client) to acquire their music instead.

      I can't fault DHB for trying, but I can fault them for not trying hard enough. The site seems built more on FUD than facts, and a little bit of something resembling backmail is there too(That could really change the industry. (and we promise we'll take down the iTunes iSbogus page)).

    4. Re:iTunes is the Devil by ilikeitraw · · Score: 0

      Great points. DHB's approach has a bit more of a grassroots edge, which is what attracted me. I'm all about takin' their stickers and mobbing my local Borders and Barnes/Nobles :)

  64. Mr Littlejeans says by mrvis · · Score: 1

    Shortest news item ever, man.

  65. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    R key? i just got back from work, the drive takes me thru 2 tolls...wtf are you talking about?

  66. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10.3.2 -- sorry about that

  67. Updates timing by mccalli · · Score: 0, Troll
    OK - this is a minor gripe but still...

    Since last night I installed a battery update, then the 10.3.2 update, and then finally these updates too. All within the space of about ten hours, and each a separate installation.

    Would it not have been possible to make all these available at the same time, thus saving the multiple update madness that I'm going through at present? Would seem a tad more rational.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Updates timing by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Resist your fondness for shiny objects and don't install updates the instant they come out. Wait a few hours, or even days, then install. That way you can install them all at once.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Updates timing by redwoodtree · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Can't please all the people all the time. If they release a jumbo patch a bunch of people complain about why they couldn't have been broken up so they could pick and choose what they want to install.

      If they release it in pieces then everyone complains about having to install in chunks. People just love to gripe I guess it's human nature.

    3. Re:Updates timing by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Switch Software Update to only check for updates once a month, and you can have all of your updates at once, if it really causes you "madness."

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:Updates timing by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Yesa, and....with MacWorld looming, all these bits/pieces will be in place just in time for 'the next big thing(s)'...

      Oh, the anticipation.

    5. Re:Updates timing by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      By default it is set to "once a week" - that should solve the problem above. Also, usually it gives you enough time to wait for a few days and read the early adopters horror stories on slashdot (like it was with the failed 10.2.8).

  68. give me mp3 or give death by dwpro · · Score: 0, Informative

    for those of you who haven't had the bright idea(and don't go spreading this around) you can burn the Annoying Constraining Crap format to cds, even cd-rw's, and re-rip the songs from that. Granted, it is a bit of a pain, but ah to be free from the chains of proprietary formatting.

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  69. XCODE update too! by goombah99 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Xcode is updated as well

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  70. MOD UP by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    the note about HotTips is actually far more inetresting than any other post so far - and I started reading late!!! I would not have seen that and the page looks pretty useful.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. Re:MP3 not AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    iTunes can convert to and from MP3, AAC, WAV and AIFF.

    Come on, lets try doing some homework before posting.

  72. spelling two part too by Talrias · · Score: 1

    from the stuff-to-download dept.

    Ah, he got it right this time!

    --
    aterr - an open source threaded discussion board.
  73. Re:How come by DrewCapu · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's to balance the fact that you'll almost never see an uppercase "I" in any product name.

    i Think i mean "iT's To balance The facT ThaT you'll almosT never see an uppercase "i" in any product name.

    iThink iThink, Therefore iThink iAm

  74. Mac OS X much more than BSD core by NonaMyous · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's true that OS X shares a common set of low level APIs with the BSD's and Linux. But OS X is much more than this core set of APIs. There's Carbon, QuickTime, Cocoa and so on.

    iTunes makes extensive use of Carbon and QuickTime. It would be non-trivial to port iTunes to a platform without these APIs.

  75. Windows version much nicer by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Well, downloaded the Windows version 4.2.0.72
    - I still can't configure iTunes to access the music store over my companies proxy servers - I don't think iTunes detects proxy servers automatically like it should - It should handle IE automatic configuration files properly?
    - You can now minimise iTunes properly rather than to the miniplayer (yay!)
    - Hopefully the bug in iTunes where it would sync with iPod but sometimes get the smart playlists inverted is fixed - I wait with baited breath... but have to go home to sync the iPod - no way I'm having any 'music libraries' on the corporate LAN!
    I'm biased though - I love anything that might make my iPod happier. I am exactly what Steve Jobs loves - I would buy Apple next time, and burn my PC in a bonfire...

    1. Re:Windows version much nicer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, iTunes blatently ignores the auto proxy setting. Nice, huh? You need to manually set it. :-(

    2. Re:Windows version much nicer by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

      Yup, you think that would be one of the first things they would have fixed... I suspect if you manually set the settings rather than use the auto config file it will work, but because the auto config file only sets the proxies internally and doesn't make them visible in IE, I don't think iTunes is able to see them. It may well be a security issue. And who modded me as flamebait - whats that all about? Someone doesn't like genuine criticism!!!

  76. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about:

    Newton
    Macintosh Portable

    Macintosh or
    Power Macintosh :)

    Sara
    a Macgrrl in an NT World

  77. Fantastic. by endquotedotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Installed the update on WinXP, rebooted, and no iTunes won't start. Nothing at all happens, really. Awesome patch.

  78. Re:How come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was talking about the audio manufacturer. (yes I'm fucking joking you moron).

  79. Re:How come by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    And an N/E key. I can never find them on Apple keyboards, and when I call to complain, they just laugh at me.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  80. Could've been an even shorter submission by DrewCapu · · Score: 2, Funny
    if...
    usr122122121 writes "iTunes 4.2 and QuickTime 6.5 were released today, available by Apple's Site and Software Update (respectively)."

    were reduced to:

    usr122122121 writes "iT 4.2 & QT 6.5 released today @ Apple and SU."

    Heck, if usr122122121's nickname weren't so long he could've gone for the first ever (?) one-line /. story!
    1. Re:Could've been an even shorter submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a 1 liner at 1440x900:-)

    2. Re:Could've been an even shorter submission by KirkH · · Score: 1

      It's one line for me. (at full-screen 1600x1200).

    3. Re:Could've been an even shorter submission by rimmon · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Plus, there is plenty of space left in that line :-)

    4. Re:Could've been an even shorter submission by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      You're a perl programmer, aren't you? :-P

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  81. More releases... by radicalskeptic · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
  82. Fullscreen support? by xfs · · Score: 1, Informative


    Has anyone else noticed that Quicktime has yet to provide fullscreen support?

    1. Re:Fullscreen support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to notice nonexistent facts, dude.

      Quicktime for the Mac has had fullscreen support forever. Command-F. Or Movie:Full Screen

    2. Re:Fullscreen support? by reiggin · · Score: 1

      You need Quicktime Pro for that. $29.95.

    3. Re:Fullscreen support? by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

      nope, if you register it it has fullscreen support. of course im not recommending you actually pay for it

      --
      TIAEAE!
    4. Re:Fullscreen support? by derdesh · · Score: 2

      On the QuickTime download page, fullscreen playback is listed as the number one reason to give Apple US$30 to upgrade to QuickTime Pro.

    5. Re:Fullscreen support? by scaryfish · · Score: 5, Informative
      No, you do not need to pay to get fullscreen. At least, not if you use a mac.

      Try the following AppleScript:

      tell application "QuickTime Player"
      activate
      set request to display dialog "Select a scaling, fool!" with icon note buttons {"normal", "double", "screen"} default button "screen"
      if button returned of request is "normal" then
      present movie 1 scale normal
      else if button returned of request is "double" then
      present movie 1 scale double
      else if button returned of request is "screen" then
      present movie 1 scale screen
      end if
      end tell
    6. Re:Fullscreen support? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      Apple loves to take the *one* freekin' feature I need to be happy with a free product and reserve it for a paid (pro) version. [*Sigh*]. I know they have to make money, but I'm shipping it off to them as fast as I can already. I can't keep up!

      Not to be a heretic and support Non-Apple software, but see my post to this discussion here for my MPlayer post. MPlayer kicks ass and (for me, anyway) beats Quicktime hands down. Check it out, you might not completely hate it... I find it very cool.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    7. Re:Fullscreen support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lack of full screen without the full version is a problem. I own quicktime pro but many times I have gone somewhere else and wanted to present a movie to a group only to find that the computer doesn't have quicktime pro. knowing about the apple script method is helpful but will still be a pain when trying to present something.

    8. Re:Fullscreen support? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      MPlayer kicks ass

      I can't get it to run. It flashes in the dock and terminates. No output in the console, so I don't know why.

    9. Re:Fullscreen support? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      Bogus.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  83. You're missing the big picture. by Paradox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmmm.

    Linux DOES probably have more machines on its side. However, that's not necessarily relevant. Linux's overwhelming number of machines is not because they have a gadzillion desktop users. They run a lot of servers. When it comes to Linux desktop usage, I've yet to see a figure that puts it significantly ahead of Apple in desktop use.

    Feel free to show me some reliable figures to prove me wrong on this.

    People running servers don't need fancy MP3 playing software. The majority of deployed linux boxes are servers. So long as tenant 2 holds, the majority of linux boxes wouldn't run iTunes.

    Apple supports iTunes with Windows for some good reasons. Firstly, it's the same reason that BeOS started supporting x86 machines. They like money, money is good, and therefore they try and get more of it. The huge spike in iTMS sales suggests this was a good move. Secondly, Quicktime was already out for Windows. Since iTunes relies on Quicktime, their sound code should be trivially portable.

    The third is a bit more uncertain. Apple was originally capable of moving OpenSTEP code to Windows via Rhapsody. I'm willing to bet there was some weight there.

    MS isn't actively trying to destroy Apple any more than it's trying to destroy everyone else. MS is too faceless to get personal with things, so don't take it personally. They're a mega-giant that steps on people every day, they can't help it. They're just intrinsically Big Business.

    As for not contributing back to the open source movment. Umm.. hello? Apple has kicked back a lot of stuff to the open source community. Apple really doesn't owe Linux in particular anything. Apple owes most of itself to BSDs.

    The fact is, you reconsidered and changed your mind based on unreasonable standards and data. If you don't want an Apple computer, that's your call. Many people would argue it's your loss though.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    1. Re:You're missing the big picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [I am posting this Anonymously so I don't lose karma from the slashdot army of mactivists. Anyway, I am not the same AC who started this thread.]


      Linux DOES probably have more machines on its side. However, that's not necessarily relevant. Linux's overwhelming number of machines is not because they have a gadzillion desktop users. They run a lot of servers. When it comes to Linux desktop usage, I've yet to see a figure that puts it significantly ahead of Apple in desktop use. Feel free to show me some reliable figures to prove me wrong on this.


      OK. Linux at 1.7% versus Mac at 3.1%.


      Keep in mind that unlike OS X, Linux can be run on old machines, new machines and everything in between (including old Macs). In addition, every Mac and Windows machine out there is a potential Linux machine. With the easy availability of low-to-no cost Linux distributions, it is nearly impossible to actually estimate the real number of desktops out there. Every estimate I have ever seen has always had the caveat that the real number is going to be a lot higher.


      People running servers don't need fancy MP3 playing software. The majority of deployed linux boxes are servers. So long as tenant 2 holds, the majority of linux boxes wouldn't run iTunes.


      Umm, we don't need QT for playing MP3's, we need it to play those trailers and movies that so many people thoughtlessly throw up on the web in that closed format. Luckily as with most things we have circumvented vendor idiocy using other means, but Apple's refusal still grates.


      Apple supports iTunes with Windows for some good reasons. Firstly, it's the same reason that BeOS started supporting x86 machines. They like money, money is good, and therefore they try and get more of it. The huge spike in iTMS sales suggests this was a good move. Secondly, Quicktime was already out for Windows. Since iTunes relies on Quicktime, their sound code should be trivially portable.


      And how much money does Apple make with their free Windows Quicktime viewer again? You do recall that is what we are talking about here?


      Apple has kicked back a lot of stuff to the open source community. Apple really doesn't owe Linux in particular anything. Apple owes most of itself to BSDs.


      Ok, then, why isn't there a QT player for FreeBSD?


      If you don't want an Apple computer, that's your call. Many people would argue it's your loss though.


      And many people wouldn't. Me, for example.


      What gets me about this whole debate is the hypocrisy from the Mac community. Whenever there is a Windows only app that comes out, there is a cry in the community about being unfairly locked out, but when Apple does the same thing to other platforms, they are defended tooth and nail by those same people.

  84. I choo-choo-choose you by filmsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since it was your post that broke my camels back, I'm going to bitch to you. If you don't want to read about a point release, DON'T! You didn't HAVE to come in here and bitch about having to come in here and bitch!

    Let the modding commence.

    fs

  85. Re:How come by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apple keyboards only have one key. You'll take what letter comes out and like it.

  86. iTunes update not showing up in Software Update by VelvetHelmet · · Score: 1

    I just went through 2 rounds of Software Updates (Panther, QuickTime, etc), but there is no sign of the iTunes update.

    I guess I'll do the manual download instead. It just seems strange that it is no longer available through Software Update.

  87. Re:MP3 not AAC? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Come on, lets try doing some homework before posting.

    You're joking right? Most people come here to avoid homework.

  88. Re:How come by Uart · · Score: 1

    "Macintosh"

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  89. I'm curious by snooo53 · · Score: 1
    Why bother? Not you specifically, but the people who do all that. I mean is it really worth all the trouble to download music online? Not to mention DRMed music at that? I guess I'm of the opinion that no one should have to jump through a company's unreasonable hoops just to BUY something from them. If I don't like the way a company does business, I shop elsewhere (or not at all). Used music store, other online services, etc.

    And secondly, I know with a lot of credit card companies it's possible to register an alternate address with them, so your bill gets sent to one but the other shows as a valid address for the card when companies check. It might be possible to have your bill sent to your canadian address but the US PO box as an alternate.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  90. Re: This ain't even news by atheken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    actually, there was a Winamp 5 story (yesterday?)

  91. Re: This ain't even news by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 1

    Linux version? That's a hack, right?

    --
    Harold
  92. Re:Buy a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a Mac and it will work as you describe!

  93. Re:How kome by da+cog · · Score: 1

    It kould be worse. At they kan type a "see" without it koming out as a "kay" like it does on KDE keyboards. :-(

    --
    Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
  94. Mirrors by baximus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Mirrors available at PlanetMirror for both:
    • iTunes 4.2 HTTP | FTP | RSYNC: rsync://rsync.planetmirror.com/apple/iTunes/
    • Quicktime 6.5 HTTP | FTP | RSYNC: rsync://rsync.planetmirror.com/quicktime/qt6.5/
  95. iTunes for Windows has changed UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows iTunes has atleast one change in user interface:

    - Those Minimize/Restore/Close -buttons work like in many other Windows apps. So for now on you'll have to use ctrl+m to switch between normal and Mini-player.

  96. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iirc, Darwin is synchronzed with FreeBSD, not OpenBSD.

    -- a.c.

  97. Convert iTunes DRM to Mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this has been suggested before, but here we go, a suggestion from me for the "I won't buy DRM music" squad.

    iTunes apparently has software in it to prevent the usual stream capture tricks working, but..

    1) Install iTunes for Windows in VirtualPC
    2) Use a regular sound grabber application under the Mac host OS VPC
    3)???
    4)Enjoy your DRMless Mp3s

    1. Re:Convert iTunes DRM to Mp3 by Helios292 · · Score: 1

      No VPC needed. WireTap by Ambrosia Software works great. Free too. Use responsibly, kids.

  98. Apple's new revenue model is music... by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    Whatever anyone thought before, Apple is now achieving their profits from music sales. The profits from iTunes will eclipse hardware in the future.

    1. Re:Apple's new revenue model is music... by tonydiesel · · Score: 1

      Uh, hate to burst your bubble there Che, but Apple has repeatedly said that the music sales don't really make them all that much money -- instead they use the iTunes store to drive iPod purchases...

      It'll take them selling a TON of songs before they make any real money when their profit per song is around 1 - 2 cents

  99. Question...? by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else's iTunes for Windows lag horridly anytime you do anything CD related? Playing a CD lags, switching tracks while playing a CD lags, importing a CD lags, etc...

    I'm sure it can't be my cd drive because it functions perfectly while copying files, playing tracks in WinAmp, etc.

    --
    Common sense is not so common.
    1. Re:Question...? by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else's iTunes for Windows lag horridly anytime you do anything CD related? Playing a CD lags, switching tracks while playing a CD lags, importing a CD lags, etc...

      I've tried iTunes on a PII/350 running Win2K and a PIII/500 running WinXP. No lag on either.

      What CPU, chipset, and audio/video cards are you using? Might be a weird hardware or driver issue.

    2. Re:Question...? by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      P3 700, 512 MB RAM, SB Live!, Radeon 7000 (dual head) on Win XP. The cdrom is a Creative 8x4x32 CD-RW.

      It only lage when trying to access the cd. The cd light stays on solid, and the cd keeps spinning up, like it's having a problem reading the cd. Then after 30 seconds or so, it starts playing.

      If I manually switch to the next track, it'll lag again. If I let it switch on it's own, it's fine.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
  100. Incremental Upgrade? by SnowWolf2003 · · Score: 1

    Has Apple never heard of allowing users just to download the upgrade, instead of having to download the entire 20MB install everytime? If you are on dial up this is a pain. And why do you even need to go to the apple site. Why can't iTunes say there is an update available, do you want to download and install it now? Click yes and it happens automatically.

    Is this just an issue with the Windows version, or do Mac users have the same problem?

    1. Re:Incremental Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. It's the Apple way of ensuring you get clean versions all the code.
      2. It does, usually iTunes figures out it has an update before the web version gets posted. I 'm guessing this release (for AOL) is timed carefully, Apple just rolled in a few updates with it.
      3. Yes, Mac users on Dial up, have to deal with massive Apple updates too, and they bitch too.

    2. Re:Incremental Upgrade? by riversky · · Score: 1

      First off. Get broadband. It's cheap. I can't imagine downloading even the songs off the store with dial up. Second, Apple unlike Microsoft wants a clean install. Not patching, ummm, excuse me, updating the application. So yes it is both Mac and Windows.

    3. Re:Incremental Upgrade? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

      In addition to the other reasons given, I notice that Apple gets good publicity out of it -- you'll remember that they say "QuickTime has been downloaded over 20 million times this year" quite often. Well, I know at least half of those downloads were me trying to get it to run on my mom's XP box.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    4. Re:Incremental Upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some people, it's just not an option. DSL just became available where I live, and before that, we had nothing. Sure, I'm spoiled by it already, but I remember how angry I was when I didn't have broadband and had to listen to people telling me to just go out and get it.

    5. Re:Incremental Upgrade? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      It's not 20MB for one point update, it's 20MB for two (2) one point updates. They're making Windows users download iTunes 4.2 and Quicktime 6.5. Trying to make their user base (QT) larger.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  101. Well.... by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "iPodHacks [ipodhacks.com] warns that booting off your iPod might be considered "abuse" by Apple if you have problems later."

    Why would you tell apple you did it?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  102. iTunes Change Log by ezthrust · · Score: 1

    I have issues with 4.1 so I have not upgraded to it. I would like to find a changelog to see if they changed certain things back to the way they were in 4.0.1 Anyone know where on the Apple site I can find a list of specific changes in iTunes for Mac? Thanks

    1. Re:iTunes Change Log by DonGar · · Score: 1
      From the readme that came with 4.2 (not a full change long).

      What's new in iTunes 4.2

      iTunes 4.2 allows you to sign in and buy music from the iTunes Music Store using either your AOL or Apple Account, view the iTunes Music Store in a separate window, and includes a number of performance improvements.

      In addition, I've noticed that it's now really hard to get it into the mini-player mode. I was flipping back and forth between mini and full views via a quick mouse operation. Now it takes a menu operation, or a keyboard shortcut. Since everything else I'm doing with it is mouse driven, that's more awkward that in was.

      The old mechanism was so natural, I'm not even sure what it was. It just happened when I wanted it too. Oh... they had changed the behavior of the maximize button. That's bad, especially from a company that's driven the contecept of strict UI guidlines, but I liked it anyway.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
  103. Now that AOLers can buy iTunes music... by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I guess this will be the most popular download within the next few days.

    ~Philly

  104. Wow by stickytar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At least Apples's website never looks like this... Microsoft.com

    --
    believing the big bang requires a certain amount of supernatural faith
  105. Punchline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the iTunes-impaired, the link in the parent brings up the iTMS listing for song "Me Too," by Toby Keith.

  106. 2.9% or 8%? Business or Personal? by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Careful with those statistics. That COE number may include business systems, if that is the case the number may be correct but it is not meaningful. The meaningful segment of this market would be personal systems. Apple's percentage here would be higher.

    1. Re:2.9% or 8%? Business or Personal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, don't forget that a majority of Apple's userbase is still on Classic, and therefore is irrelevant for this discussion.

    2. Re:2.9% or 8%? Business or Personal? by decepty · · Score: 1

      How'd you get those statistics Mr. Random Q. Fakestats?

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
  107. IPod is dead! by thopo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    IRiver IHP-120 is the new king!

    --
    keep it simple.
    1. Re:IPod is dead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In this case, your .sig is ironic.

  108. not by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    use a 20 gig creative nomad, and www.notmad.com
    Native disk use, no DRM, any file types, play ON THE DEVICE though an external hookup using a web interface that doesn't reside on ur PC IE use 2% resources and listen to a 20 hour playlist. Creative made the player, and the lousy software that made me hate it. Notmad made the drivers to make it a generic external device and made me LOVE IT AGAIN :) with dual analog inputs it hooks to my PC AND My stereo simultaneously making a great bridge, my ONLY real complaint now is the USB is SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW :(

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  109. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by derubergeek · · Score: 5, Informative
    Yeah - Quicktime is such a POS that MPEG-4 is based on it. Bunch of losers.

    Really - before you start ranting you should at least bother to learn something about the subject. You can write plugins for QT. There is technical documentation at Apple's Quicktime developer's site, and you can download both Windows & Mac SDKs. Also, check sourceforge for other QT Components.

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
  110. Some changes I noticed in windows by lune+tns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First: My beloved 'player-control' window is now accessible only by using 'ctrl+m'. The standard windows 'maximize' button now sets iTunes up to full screen.

    Second: One performance increase I noticed immediately is that it's no longer lagging when scrolling through large library lists. I have 3500+ mp3s in there, and the previous version was very choppy when scrolling. The update seems to have fixed that.

  111. 44.1 kHz CDDA by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    By doing this, you not only lose data by using a different encoder than the one used for the files on the iTMS, but you also downsample to 44.1 kHz from 48 kHz, which significantly degrades the audio fidelity. That is not really an option. Using SoundStudio, however, you can easily export to 48 kHz PCM in an AIFF container, and save most of the fidelity.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  112. veridisc/ fairplay weirdness by nudicle · · Score: 1
    I think Apple developed Fairplay on its own. At least, that's what it suggests in this Forbes article:

    http://www.forbes.com/2003/04/29/cx_ah_0429tentech .html

    fairplay.com redirects to welcome.net, which doesn't help.

    veridisc.com, a company which does appear to make a DRM solution called Fairplay, redirects to a porn site.

    http://64.244.235.240/ appears to take one to a company called Veridisc working on DRM called Fairplay, but their website doesn't seem to mention a big Apple related score. And all their internal links use the IP to self reference.

    In short, I think the best option is to contact veridisc.com and ask the webmaster for a license to his content. :)

  113. DO NOT USE APOSTROPHE'S IN PLURAL'S by alex_ant · · Score: 0

    thank you

  114. HD use ok by djupedal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What??? ....I mean...what a crock.

    The HD's in iPods are some of Toshiba's best laptop drives, and there's no way you can 'burn out the hard drive' by booting from it...sheez.

    1. Re:HD use ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you insinuating that Apple's WRONG? Trust me, if Apple says the Hard Drives in the iPod are crap, they're crap. End of story.

      Ohh, wait...

    2. Re:HD use ok by Pope · · Score: 1

      Laptops generally have cooling areas for the HD, iPods certainly don't.

      Running an OS off an iPod is an incredibly stupid thing to do; the occasionaly emergency boot should be OK, but booting into the OS and running a friggin' game for hours at a time is just plain asking for trouble.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:HD use ok by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Get real...an iPod is built to run, Give Apple some credit and stop spreading FUD.

  115. Have to say this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BIG FUCKIN DEAL.

  116. Re:How come by scottblascocomposer · · Score: 1

    There does, however, appear to be some problem with the capital "I." Or "i," actually. :)

    --
    To reign is to serve.
  117. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you don't go around talking about linux/bsd as unix based.

  118. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by mehgul · · Score: 1

    but no full-screen maximize mode on any convenient keypress if the feature is even there.

    Others already pointed out before me that full-screen is available only with QT Pro (~30$). On the Mac there are free add-ons to play full-screen, like this one. Dunno if that exists for Windows.

    Anyway, Quicktime don't let you do any of this stuff. Who is it for? Who uses it, other than mac loons without viable alternatives?

    You shouldn't forget that you're not talking about QuickTime, which is a technology integrated to the system on Mac OS X. You're bitching about the QuickTime Player, which is essentially a crippled frontend to the technology, no worse than WMP or Real Player. See this for an overview. And by the way, don't worry for Mac loons, I don't think they lack choice.

    the quicktime versions always tend to be itty bitty 320x240 things with scratchy lo-fi sound

    I don't see how you can blame QuickTime or Apple for that. If you want some quality content encapsulated in .mov wrapper, just go here for a starter. In fact, if QT was so irrelevant, I don't see why the format has been taken as the basis for the MPEG-4 standard by the ISO.

  119. woah, cool, MOD PARENT UP by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    That script works great!

    I had previously been using various freeware Quicktime-compliant players to playback fullscreen. They work, but most have clunky GUIs.

    Thanks!

    1. Re:woah, cool, MOD PARENT UP by scaryfish · · Score: 3, Informative
      I should point out that the original script was by Mikey-San.

      I did make a few modifications, however.

  120. Everyone missed the point! by azpcox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The big news is that these were items that could have been announced at MacWorld SF. instead, they are released now.

    What does Steve have up his sleeve for then?

    --
    What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
  121. Wrong by WiseWeasel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, you're partially wrong. They are encoded by the labels and/or their distributors, but not from CD (in most cases). Apple has said that they encourage submitters to encode from the original masters, and that most are. The lowest quality you can find on the iTMS is ripped from CD, but most songs available are encoded from the DAT masters directly to 48 kHz 128 kbit AAC.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  122. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quicktime is a media wrapper with gobs of supported codecs and track types (it even supports a special text track for that MIDI karaoke fomat that never really took off). DVD Studio Pro, Final Cut Pro, and the OS X version of Shake are all very heavily QT-based. (As are iTunes, iMovie, iDVD, and even iPhoto).

    The "Quicktime Player" is just a free front-end demo sort of thing that doesn't want to die. Seeing how Apple has published all the specs for the QT framework, I'm amazed someone hasn't written a nicer player frontend.

    Most people only use QT for DV25/DVCPro25 and DV50/DVCPro50 video editing (and futher down the data path, MPEG2 for output). Be it at home from their MiniDV camera in iMovie and output to DVD via iDVD or a pro using Final Cut and DVD Studio.

    Soooo many of .mov files I ran across on the net use the worst possible codecs (maybe for better compatibility?) usually cinepak, which hasn't changed since Quicktime 1.0 in 1991. But then, that's not any worse than the people that output to AVI using something like the crusty old Indeo 1 codec... equal ass quality.

    I don't hate QT, it's part of what makes Macs and their applications a more sane world, but I do with QT had a few more codecs and wish there were some better frontends/players. (There were gobs of third-party/shareware/freeware QT player frontends back in the oldschool classic Mac OS days... but very few for OS X).

  123. Re:Also updated today.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The poster was talking about windows.

  124. OpenBSD based my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? It's not OpenBSD based you hippie, lay down the crackpipe.
    And it's hardly only a window manager.

  125. Your lame retort... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't characterize *all* mac users as gay...only yourself...not that there's anything wrong with that...

  126. Re:Also updated today.... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

    Who is the "Geek Collective"? Slashdot editors? They're the only ones that deem anything "cool" here on slashdot.

  127. iTunes/QuickTime fun by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    I decided to write a QTFairUse HOWTO guide for going from iTunes DRM-enabled M4P to nice clean AAC (or WAV or MP3...) since everybody out there seems to say it doesn't work. Yes, there may be easier ways to do this on OS X, but if you use iTunes for Windows, you might be interested. Anyway, you can find it here.


    I haven't actually tried QTFairUse with the new QuickTime, so it's not impossible that QTFairUse won't successfully patch QuickTime anymore.

  128. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by Scott+Francis[Mecham · · Score: 1

    Seeing how Apple has published all the specs for the QT framework, I'm amazed someone hasn't written a nicer player frontend.

    They have.

    I haven't had to open a QTPlayer, WiMP, or even install the Real player since I got Media Player Classic.

    --
    --
  129. Stop using facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is /.
    Facts are of no use here.

  130. News Flash!!! by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1
    "They have gotten so much free code and good will from the open source community and yet they still insist on making it that much more difficult for Linux users to be able to do something as basic as watch their "exclusive" movie trailers."


    Linux != open source...

    I think the *BSDs are benefiting just fine from Apple's investment...but then again, "BSD is dying"(R)...so what do I know...
    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  131. Re:How come by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

    Solution: Move to New York. Permanently.

  132. But you still have to PAY for fullscreen by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that baffles me with Quicktime is that you still have to PAY to have the privilage of doing what every other free player out there already does... show a movie in fullscreen.

    I'm all for Quicktime charging to be able to author quicktime movies, but to be able to watch them in fullscreen baffles me.

    (And I love how on their website they demonstrate it as some amazing feature to be able to do so and call it their 'Theatre' mode or some such crud...)

    1. Re:But you still have to PAY for fullscreen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should call it iTheatre and charge double :-)

    2. Re:But you still have to PAY for fullscreen by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. QuickTime is the default movie player in OS X, and not supporting full screen makes it look very cheap. On the other hand, there's Cellulo, which is a very nice QuickTime-based player and is free. I also use VLC, which uses its own codecs, and has (in my opinion) a nicer UI.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:But you still have to PAY for fullscreen by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just to nitpick...what you're paying for is the pro version of Quicktime Player, which is the included movie-player program, not the Quicktime architecture itself.


      Quicktime (the architecture) supports full-screen video regardless of whether you upgrade the Player to the Pro version or not. If you don't want to pay to use Apple's QT Player, just use a different player program (mplayer, etc.). They're just different front-ends on the same 'guts,' and the guts are free.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    4. Re:But you still have to PAY for fullscreen by StarManta · · Score: 0

      My problem with MPlayer (aside from my habit of accidentally trashing the disk image on occasion) is that I can't set it to be the default video player, due to the way MPlayer requires you to drag it manually into the playlist.... :-/

      --
      StarManta
      I don't think BMW has ever complained about their 2% marketshare. Neither has Apple.
  133. What by molywi · · Score: 1

    I will probably be modded down for this, but why is this on the front page? Whats such a big deal about quicktime and itunes having new versions? I dont think this is front page worthy, maybe on apple./..org.

  134. Re:MP3 not AAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTune's cannot convert from AAC to anything and believe me I've trie'd!

  135. Where is sort by path anf filename? by AbRASiON · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I realise that itunes is designed for people using a mac file system - and I also realise iTunes can sort your data for you.

    It's also made primarily for people who use id3 tags (and thanks to itunes I'm working towards tagging all my stuff - it's a great player)

    BUT in the meantime how does one sort by path and file name? - it's a simple feature winamp has but it makes things so much easier - especially when dealing with files named 01 - song name.mp3 (then in ANOTHER directory) 01 - song name.mp3 - it just puts ALL of them up the top.

    Great program but needs some serious work.

    (hell I'll keep whining while I'm here)

    Where's the bloody maximise? - some of us Windows freaks LIKE full screen applications - I can't help it, it's habit and I find it always looks best - I use alt tab to swap anyhow - I want a FULLY maximised package.

    Here's some other questions.
    What if I format my machine - is there a way of backing up my "opinion" on each song? the database of how many times played, my rating for each song etc? (yes I realise it MAY be possible I'm just pointing this out)

    Also if I move my data on my machine to another location I'd love to be able to re-point itunes to the new data without having to lose it all and re-work all the stats / ratings

    Itunes HAS to write to the "my documents" directory - this is annoying - i can't specify another location.

    1. Re:Where is sort by path anf filename? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I realise that itunes is designed for people using a mac file system - and I also realise iTunes can sort your data for you.

      Being able to move around some files doesn't mean "Mac file system".

      "It's also made primarily for people who use id3 tags (and thanks to itunes I'm working towards tagging all my stuff - it's a great player)"

      Good. Non-tagged files are useless when they move from their neat directory structure... such as onto an iPod!

      BUT in the meantime how does one sort by path and file name?

      You don't. iTunes is designed to either rip your CDs, or for you to buy them. Either way, they'll be tagged.

      "it's a simple feature winamp has but it makes things so much easier - especially when dealing with files named 01 - song name.mp3 (then in ANOTHER directory) 01 - song name.mp3 - it just puts ALL of them up the top.

      "Great program but needs some serious work."


      It's been this way since iTunes was first released. Don't expect it to change. Just keep tagging...

      "(hell I'll keep whining while I'm here)"

      Yes, yes you will.

      "Where's the bloody maximise? - some of us Windows freaks LIKE full screen applications - I can't help it, it's habit and I find it always looks best - I use alt tab to swap anyhow - I want a FULLY maximised package."

      Err, this was just added with this iTune 4.2 release. Please pay attention.

      "Here's some other questions.
      What if I format my machine - is there a way of backing up my "opinion" on each song? the database of how many times played, my rating for each song etc? (yes I realise it MAY be possible I'm just pointing this out)"


      Yes, just save your iTunes database, which'll be in the iTunes directory where your music is.

      "Also if I move my data on my machine to another location I'd love to be able to re-point itunes to the new data without having to lose it all and re-work all the stats / ratings"

      Open up preferences. Check the last tab. Choose the right location.

      "Itunes HAS to write to the "my documents" directory - this is annoying - i can't specify another location."

      Have you even used iTunes for more than a minute? Open the damn Preferences menu and look at it sometime, genius.

    2. Re:Where is sort by path anf filename? by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup. Your trying to fight iTunes instead of letting it work for and with you.

      Why would you have two instances of the same song on your machine unless they were from different albums, different encodings, or sample rates or such? iTunes just did you a favor, it found you some wasted hard drive space. Delete the duplicate(s) and move on.
      If they aren't exact duplicates then use the "View Options" to add the appropriate colums to the display so you can discerne the differences between the tracks.
      iTunes stores enough tag and other meta information that you should never have to sort files manually. Manual and smart playlists are tremendously powerful, especially when you can create smart playlists based on the contents of the "comments" box for each track. For example, I use terms like "male female group solo singing instrumental acoustic live remix" in the comments field. I have several smart playlists that sort on these, such as "live group rock"; this is powerful voodoo.

      To backup your comments and such, simply copy the "iTunes 4 Music Library" file. You can later restore it to the appropriate place and all will be well.

      Chances are that if you are going to "move my data on my machine to another location" that you would be moving the entire location of your "my documents" folder. iTunes would then look for its file(s) relative to that new location. If you DO just want to move the iTunes database, simply use a shortcut (alias to MAc users, symlink to BSD heads).

      Unless you are a geek who wants to tweak, there's little to no reason for iTunes to complicate matters by offering alternate locations for the database. The standard options allow for a centralized store of music, and each user to maintain their own ratings, comments, etc.

      The window maximize thing is annoying. It doesn't even work on the Mac like it's supposed to (hold Option, click the window zoom button). To make a maximized iTunes window you have to manually drag the window to size. Apple does occasionally break its own HIG documents, and this is one of those occasions.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    3. Re:Where is sort by path anf filename? by gryphokk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Itunes HAS to write to the "my documents" directory - this is annoying - i can't specify another location.

      You can specify any browsable location you like.

      Edit:Preferences:Advanced lets you choose your iTunes Music Folder Location.

      (On the Mac) I set permissions wide open on my main user's (me) music folder. Then I set all the other users' (my daughters) iTunes folder to my folder. Voila! We all have access to all our music. IF they rip it, download it or buy it, I've got it -- without having to duplicate drive space consumption for everyone to have Led Zeppelin. (Course then I get to wade through all their Ani and Shania, but likewise they have to put up with my ELP and Tchaikovsky.)

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    4. Re:Where is sort by path anf filename? by malte12 · · Score: 1

      Thanx for that Info.

  136. Not Laptop Drives by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    The drives are not 'laptop drives' (2.5"), but are instead much smaller 1.8" drives. Still they are robust enough for occasional use as a boot drive. It would be best to keep the game installed on the internal hard drive and use it from there, and just boot the OS from the iPod. Apps don't need to be installed on your boot drive.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  137. win32 Ogg-QT does not work well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I know that there is an open source plugin for windows-Quicktime that plays ogg files just fine.

    Taking 10-20 seconds to load one Ogg file is not just fine. IMHO, the win32 plugin still needs much work.

    (Actually, the delay is less noticable for local files because thew plugin waits for the EOF. Files over the network take a few more seconds, and Ogg Vorbis streams are unplayable because they never reach EOF.)

  138. Re:How come by martinX · · Score: 1

    And it's a Mac not a MAC.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  139. Toshiba states laptop usage by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Toshiba introduces a 40GB 1.8-inch embedded HDD, the MK4004GAH. Enabling some of today's most exciting, small form factor mobile devices, the new mini-drives offer manufacturers significant storage for consumer, commercial and PC applications - such as music players, handheld PCs, PDAs, wearable computers and laptops. Toshiba is committed to grow with developers and users to provide smart computing solutions, backed by Toshiba-renowned quality and technology leadership.

    Suggesting 'only occasional use as a boot drive' is silly.

  140. Hahahaaaa by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    Yeah, nice troll . . . laughable at best, though. I'd be interested in knowing how you came up with the millions of users data (I suspect it's from your arse). What kind of businesses use it? It sure as hell isn't publishing, and FilmGIMP doesn't count. Name a whole country that switched to the GIMP, I dare you. Pretty bold move, I'd say, forcing all your citizens and civil servants to use the GIMP. Maybe that's why that's never happened? The GIMP is by no means a replacement for Photoshop. The case could be made for competition against PS Elements, but that's about it. As much as you'd like it to be true, I have yet to see someone make the case for the GIMP as a replacement for PS for professional use in publishing. Like it or lump it, PS is the gold standard in professional image editing.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  141. Re:Also updated today.... by DonGar · · Score: 1

    I agree, but see the original point also. How long would it take to port iTunes to any Unix/Linux machine other than OS X? OS X is unix, but it's fairly far away from the *nix norm.

    And I have come to expect full source for Unix apps, so that I can try that port myself if I want. I know that's not always true, but it's still in my head that way. They have released some of the key libraries, which is really cool. But I don't see them releasing source to iTunes itself any time soon.

    --
    plus-good, double-plus-good
  142. That's Not The GIMP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FilmGIMP is a completely different app, and has been renamed 'CinePaint'. The grandparent's question still stands.

  143. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by bogie · · Score: 1

    " Yeah - Quicktime is such a POS that MPEG-4 is based on it"

    WTF does that have to do with the Quicktime Player being a slow unresponsive ugly POS? Yea the codec good, big deal. Its still wrapped in a big ugly crappy client. You can point to all the plugins, documentation, bell whistles, and the fact that it can be programmed to bake you cookies, it STILL doesn't change the fact that the client is a big slow ugly POS.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  144. Toshiba 1.8" laptop drive specs (iPod too) by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

    1.8-inch HDD
    40.0 GB:
    MK4004GAH

    Lightweight, only 62 grams
    Low Power Consumption
    15ms Average Seek Time
    100MB/s Ultra DMA Transfer Rate
    300,000 MTTF Hours

    Sounds like a laptop drive to me...and a good one too! One that doesn't know the difference between audio, OS files, games or video...knock yourself out.

    Run it all you want, that's what the warranty/extended warranty is for. One year from Toshiba to Apple to you...more if you have Apple Care, CompUSA, etc.

  145. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QTFairUse dumps the AAC bytestream after decryption but prior to decoding.

  146. Some G5 users are having problems with these. by dbirchall · · Score: 1
    I'm one of them. I know of one other, so far. The symptoms, after installing QuickTime 6.5 and iTunes 4.2 (in the 2 cases I'm aware of thus far; iTunes may not actually be implicated since there have been other complaints from people who only installed QuickTime 6.5) are:

    1. Several apps - iTunes, iChat, DVD Player, QuickTime Broadcaster - don't appear when launched, leaving only a "not responding" icon in the dock.
    2. Several menubar-accessible functions, like Force Quit, Restart, Log Out, and fast user switching, stop functioning.
    3. System Preferences launches and displays its main window, but is unresponsive.
    4. System performance drops precipitously (my Xbench scores were down over 25%) and things like ejecting optical disks, sleeping, etc. either are very slow or don't work at all.
    In my case, I reset everything in Open Firmware (reset-nvram and reset-all), booted from the system DVD, checked the disks, checked permissions, rebooted and checked them again from userspace with Cocktail - no dice. Called AppleCare and they suggested an "archive and restore" back to the 10.2.7 "Smeagol" the machine came with. That fixed things; I'm currently re-upgrading to Panther, but will stick with lower numbered versions of iTunes and QuickTime until I hear this has been resolved.
  147. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

    Quicktime DOES NOT SUCK. On Windows it's pretty braindamaged, because Windows already has a video API (DirectShow) - on Mac, Quicktime IS the video API.

    QT's free player has a nag screen yes... and no, there is no fullscreen unless you buy Pro. (Which bothers me, but it's not a big deal: it's a very clean player, actually.) On Mac, it has a very low footprint because most of it is already loaded into the OS!

    And us "mac loons" without viable alternatives? MplayerOSX seems to work well. I just don't use it because QT does almost everything I need it to. (There's a single codec it doesn't play that I have a lot of CDs with. I use mplayer for those.) I might add that if you download 3ivx, QT suddenly supports DivX, Xvid, and 3ivx; I can watch DVD rips with no problem. .mov is, by the way, a container. And Sorenson is actually a good codec. By default iMovie doesn't export to anything more than 320x240, and anything more than that is too bandwidth-sucking to be offered for web download anyway. Sorenson shines at this resolution, I might add.

    Read. Understand. Then post. ;)

  148. How does this help us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should we care if Apple releases software that only runs on windoze and OS/X? When they release a version that works on Linux, let us know then.

    1. Re:How does this help us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look up.

      The domain is 'apple.slashdot.org'.

  149. Followup: The problem may have been XCode. by dbirchall · · Score: 1

    Apparently the XCode 1.1 update (which I had also installed at the same time as QuickTime 6.5) has been (according to several people - I'm only back up to 10.3.0 thus far and haven't checked for it yet) may have been pulled -- which would indicate some kind of problem.

  150. Booting OK according to Apple by Ffakr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um.. Apple publicly states that one prefered way to image xServes is to boot from your iPod and then copy an image from it. Apple had the Genetech guys up on stage at WWDC hawking iPods because they use them to configure their clusters.
    so.. Apple says it's OK to boot from it and iPodHacks says Apple says you can't boot from it.

    Hmn.. who to believe, who to believe?

    --

    I'm not feeling witty so bite me

  151. WRONG, IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot mods, too.

    It was not a utility thzat captured the audio output. It grabbed the un"protected" aac in transit.

    Why is this so hard to grok?

  152. No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing could be better than God (pick which one) at ramming you in the ass! Religions have had millennia to perfect ass-ramming to a fine art, to the point that you ask for more.

    1. Re:No Way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. Apple seems to do a good job of it. I mean they ARE selling a 400 dollar mp3 player.

  153. When it actually works... by itmsunder · · Score: 1

    Except it doesn't play just fine for a lot of people. Many people have problems with it either having far too high a percentage of CPU usage, or like me, it has massive skipping problems, even with a monster system with no background tasks other than antivirus and software firewall.

    So no, in actuality, it doesn't play ogg just fine, and that's why I'm now using Winamp 5, which does. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather be using itunes, but until it stops mangling my music, that isn't a choice.

  154. from the 'the dictionary is your friend' dept. by splateagle · · Score: 1

    available by Apple's Site and Software Update (respectively)

    um, since both updates can be downloaded by either route it's not 'respectively', even in parenthesis.

  155. Re:MP3 not AAC? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Well, you could always burn it to CD, change your import prefs to AIFF, WAV or MP3 and reimport them.

    It's not lossless, but if you're listening to the songs on the headphones that came with your mp3 player or computer, you won't notice the difference anyway.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  156. WTF does "market share" mean? by aphor · · Score: 1

    People are stupid about "market share." What they mean is a percentage of the horizontal (everyone) market. The problem is that you don't need everyone to buy your competitive product with a small tiny profit margin. All you need is a decent number of people who believe the price you're asking with a significant margin is worth it.

    When people talk about "market share" it's like they are counting heads in two opposing armies. First, users aren't in the armies; developers are. Second; it isn't the headcount but the operational capabilities of those developers. It's like saying "My thousand infantrymen can kick your five bomber pilots' asses and then blow up their airplanes." Maybe, in special circumstances they could...

    You see, the reason Apple is still here is that there is an impasse. A segment, or rather a niche, firmly props Apple up. The windahs crowd will slavishly swallow anything you spray in their faces, and then cheer about it later: "my software company has a bigger ____!"

    The reason Apple will not die is that they make products which compel people to buy them. I still want a 17" PowerBook for x-mas! Indeed.

    --
    --- Nothing clever here: move along now...
  157. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  158. You just don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post, my friend, illustrates the problem here (of which you are apparently a part). R-ing the F-ing A does NOT refer to the "item" at the top of this page. It refers to clicking the link and reading the fucking article. Here you go thinking you always read the "articles" when you read /.'s summary.

  159. Wow. This is interesting. Let's continue. by Paradox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    First, I'd like to say how refreshing it is to converse with someone who can actually think their argument through. Even if I don't agree with you, I still am going to tip my hat.

    [I am posting this Anonymously so I don't lose karma from the slashdot army of mactivists. Anyway, I am not the same AC who started this thread.]

    However, 10 points lost for giving a damn about slashdot karma. :P Anyways...

    All your article says is that it's hard to count linux users. Claiming it's uncertain does nothing for your argument, so I'll just move along. It's also important to note that not all linux users, even in the desktop realm, are going to be iTunes users. The linux world is very diverse, I think we can all agree.

    Keep in mind that unlike OS X, Linux can be run on old machines, new machines and everything in between (including old Macs). In addition, every Mac and Windows machine out there is a potential Linux machine. With the easy availability of low-to-no cost Linux distributions, it is nearly impossible to actually estimate the real number of desktops out there. Every estimate I have ever seen has always had the caveat that the real number is going to be a lot higher.

    Err, this kind of thinking is pretty standard, and it's also why Apple is doing quite well right now. Who gives a damn about the machines? I'll say it again, in bold: Who gives a damn what the machines can do? The answer is people like me, who are engineers.

    Most machines are potential linux machines. However, most users are not potential Linux users! This is important. A machine may be capable, but if a user isn't, then who cares?

    Apple sure doesn't. Apple has philosophy and style, but at the end of the day, they have a bank account that needs to be full enough to pay their engineers.

    Umm, we don't need QT for playing MP3's, we need it to play those trailers and movies that so many people thoughtlessly throw up on the web in that closed format. Luckily as with most things we have circumvented vendor idiocy using other means, but Apple's refusal still grates.

    Umm. Tell me, because I'm interested... How should Apple implement a consistent product on Linux. Remember, Apple's entire marketing strategy is based around the EXPERIENCE of use, and its consistency. These are important things.

    Should apple use SDL? Straight OpenGL? Make their own library? What GUI toolkit? GTK+? Motif? Should it be a KDE App? A Gnome App? Neither?

    Apple cannot make a consistant and reasonable player app in Linux. If they choose toolkits and run with it, they get nailed. If they make their own toolkits, they get nailed.

    This is not even mentioning the huge amount of porting they'd need to do.

    As for your complaints about movie trailers, I suggest you get over it. There is a small price to pay for freedom man. When I started using Linux, I couldn't even watch movies at all.

    What Apple is doing with Quicktime is no better or worse than what MS and Real are doing. They're trying to make money with a quality video/audio encoder and decoder. The end quality of the product isn't important, it's the intention that dictates the reasoning here.

    And how much money does Apple make with their free Windows Quicktime viewer again? You do recall that is what we are talking about here?

    They make money by spreading the quicktime decoder and convincing people to use it. Then professionals (you know, commercial use of software to make products) will buy the encoder software to publish their work.

    Do you remember how business works?

    Ok, then, why isn't there a QT player for FreeBSD?

    Umm. For the same reason there isn't a Linux one. I'm sorry, Apple has kicked back to the community in other areas. Areas that are arguably more important than a media player.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  160. Making this an Apple product, naturally by ianscot · · Score: 1
    ...I don't see Apple just porting the store and not the rest of the features iTunes has. From what I've seen, they seem to want to keep everything together in products like that, because the presentation and the total package are a vital part of their image.

    Hyup, that would be Apple. Pretty clearly, the iTMS basically works as a Web application; they could do the whole thing using an analogous Web site and be able to sell to basically anyone, if what they wanted was to sell tracks of music. Instead they've restricted access to the store for their player only.

    iTunes is a very nice little jukebox, it rips and burns (at okay but not great speeds), it has the little store, and it works awfully well with your iPod. the package is all very "together" and decently designed, in the Generalisimo Jobs tradition. That last part is the whole reason for the iTMS: the iTMS is a loss leader for selling iPods, or that's why they did it anyway.

    Similarly, the iLife "suite" -- iMovie, iPhoto, etc. -- is a loss leader for selling Apple machines, too. That'd be Apple. (And I'm a satisfied little customer myself, FWIW. Enjoyable to use.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  161. Quicktime 6.5: Totally crunched my machine by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what makes me special, but this went very badly for me. After the install, no app the loads the QT framework would start -- they all crashed at Init()+44.

    That meant no Finder, no iPhoto, no iTunes, no Safari, no Mozilla, etc, etc. They all crashed on startup.

    I solved the problem by rolling my own downgrade -- I found a machine that still had 6.4 and made a tarball of /System/Library/Frameworks/QuickTime

    which I then installed and rebooted. So far everything seems OK.

  162. Well, that's one opinion by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    Yes, I bet they do have a few of those. However, given that at least until six months ago (I have no data for time since then) the Apple Stores all restored their systems to prestine state by plugging an iPod into them, booting off of it, and then restoring the drive from an image on the iPod, I wouldn't take this too seriously.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  163. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah - Quicktime is such a POS that MPEG-4 is based on it.
    Other way around, idiot.
  164. Re:Quicktime sucks. Who cares? by derubergeek · · Score: 1
    No wonder you're an AC.

    From: http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-4/ mpeg-4.htm

    10.9MPEG-4 File Format

    The MP4 file format is designed to contain the media information of an MPEG-4 presentation in a flexible, extensible format which facilitates interchange, management, editing, and presentation of the media. This presentation may be 'local' to the system containing the presentation, or may be via a network or other stream delivery mechanism (a TransMux). The file format is designed to be independent of any particular delivery protocol while enabling efficient support for delivery in general. The design is based on the QuickTime(R) format from Apple Computer Inc.

    Although, to be fair, I should have said "based in part".

    --
    Trust me. This is an inactive account. Regardless of what the /. bean counters might report.
  165. Re:How come by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Because while the names may suck, the products don't.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984