Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rover Opportunity Lands Safely

JoeRobe writes "All indications are that the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity has safely landed on Mars. After 10 minutes of bouncing and rolling, it has come to a rest and transmitted its signal. There are no fault tones, indicating that there were no errors during landing and rolling. The rover has landed in the Meridiani Planum, where there are large deposits of hematite, indicating the presence of past water. The lander has landed on one of its side petals, so the next step is to make itself upright and deflate its airbags." And loconet writes "Reuters and abc.net.au, among others, are of the first news sources to confirm that Opportunity has successfully landed on Mars. The probe had successfully made contact with controllers on Earth after landing at 0505 GMT on Sunday in an area of the planet known as the Meridiani Planum. The landing procedures achieved a best-case scenario on which all systems performed as expected. At first, engineers thought the lander had been rolling for a long time, but it turns out the antenna used to communicate with Earth was pointing towards the ground, which made the signal bounce off Mars and as the Earth moves, made it seem as if it had been bouncing for over 5 minutes. The lander is currently side petal down, and will take a while before it straightens itself out. California's governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Ex Vice-president Al Gore were in attendance at the event in the JPL facilities." Many readers also wrote to point out the coverage at spaceflightnow.

426 comments

  1. YAY by dnahelix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    woo hoo

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  2. 2 for 2 by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    And did we not need this on the anniversary of Columbia? Yeah, I think so. COngrats to all involved from the /. community.

    1. Re:2 for 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Survey says: ARRRRRRGGNNNT!!!

      Wrong answer. Challenger exploded on 28 Jan, and Columbia disintegrated on 01 Feb.

    2. Re:2 for 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First surface images at Meridiani are also here

    3. Re:2 for 2 by Lucidwray · · Score: 1

      USA ( EARTH 2: Mars 0 ) GO EARTH!!!

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
    4. Re:2 for 2 by judicar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually i think the count is more like

      Mars: 28 Earth: 9

      I think the Soviets set the record for most failed mars missions in row. Their first 12 missions failed taking nearly 14 years to get a successful mission in 1974 with Mars 5.

      They don't call it the death planet for nothing.

    5. Re:2 for 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually i think the count is more like

      Mars: 28 Earth: 9


      Those are the stats for last season.

    6. Re:2 for 2 by McAddress · · Score: 2, Funny
      Their first 12 missions failed taking nearly 14 years to get a successful mission in 1974 with Mars 5.

      stupid commie bastards, why the hell would you name your 13th mission 'mars 5'.

    7. Re:2 for 2 by tftp · · Score: 1

      To confuse Martian Defense, of course!

  3. Sweet. by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 4, Funny

    The next band I form is going to be called Meridiani Planum and the Opportunities.

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
    1. Re:Sweet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you can make it from the runner-ups of Martian Idol?

    2. Re:Sweet. by CodeWheeney · · Score: 1

      Better geek band name:

      The Pauli Exclusion Principle

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    3. Re:Sweet. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I've always been partial to "The Ultraviolet Catastrophe".

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. Yipee! by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    Congrats to everyone who made this possible!

  5. Heh by Cat_Byte · · Score: 3, Funny

    At first they thought it was rolling slowly for a very long time. Maybe the Martians were kicking it around & poking it with a stick. ;)

    I was watching the whole thing on the webcast. I was personally disgusted when cnn & the others cut it off to run some interview with Nicole Kidman while it was still rolling across the surface.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    1. Re:Heh by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh,

      They have webcam's on mars covering the mars rover? Awesome!

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    2. Re:Heh by originalTMAN · · Score: 1

      Nah. Martians don't like soccer and they aren't too partian to good ol' American baseball. That's why they call it the red planet.

    3. Re:Heh by the+pickle · · Score: 3, Funny

      They have webcam's on mars covering the mars rover? Awesome!

      Yeah. They're part of the Naked Mars Rovers Internet Teenage Sorority House XXX Voyeur project. Didn't you get that e-mail? I can send you a few of my spare copies if you didn't...

      p

    4. Re:Heh by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      They have webcam's on mars covering the mars rover? Awesome!

      I'm suprised one of the TV news channels didn't try to 'embed' a reporter in the mission.

  6. Opportunity and Spirit by Gunfighter · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA should set Opportunity on a course to make the 6600 mile trek and kick Spirit's ass for acting up. A little sibling rivalry can't be too bad.

    Reminds me of the old botwar games where you program your bots (rotate, move, or shoot) and watch them go at it.

    --
    -- Stu

    /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    1. Re:Opportunity and Spirit by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the feeling it would be like that scene in Silent Running where the two robots look over at where the third used to be?

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:Opportunity and Spirit by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "NASA should set Opportunity on a course to make the 6600 mile trek and kick Spirit's ass for acting up."

      No, because some idiot along the line will tell Opportunity to move 6600 kilometers instead.

    3. Re:Opportunity and Spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RoboStrike is a perfect example of turn based bot war.

  7. go fix Spirit! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hurry and go press control-alt-delete on Spirit!

    1. Re:go fix Spirit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually Spirit has been rebooting itself 60 times per day.

      My guess is that it is infected with MS-Blaster.

    2. Re:go fix Spirit! by Cliffy03 · · Score: 1

      They should have used LegOS.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Nigel makes plans for you!
  8. How Long? by darkjedi521 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long before the two rovers drag race each other?

    1. Re:How Long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same length of time for a monkey to count to 744,526

    2. Re:How Long? by shaneb11716 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How long before the two rovers drag race each other?


      They already have.

      --
      I love teh int4rw3b!!!!!111one1
    3. Re:How Long? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Do you live in Bohemia, NY?

  9. Good work, JPL by NormalVisual · · Score: 2

    I had the privilege of seeing Opportunity start its journey, and I'm glad to see it made it to Mars okay. Great job, JPL/NASA, and congrats!

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    1. Re:Good work, JPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome sig

  10. Thanks from NASA by QuantumFTL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, as a software engineer on MER, I must say that I and my collegues are all thrilled to see yet another success! NASA's Mars program has needed a success like this, and we are thrilled to get yet another chance to explore Mars.

    I would like to thank all of the other engineers and scientists that have worked on this mission... many of which worked untold hours of unpaid overtime to do the things that the budgets couldn't afford (and that the mission couldn't live without).

    I'd like to thank the leaders of our nation for giving us the resources to accomplish this feat, and their support politically.

    But most importantly I'd like to thank the public for their interest, excitement, and moral/fiscal support. We're doing this for you and your children, that they might understand the universe better. Thanks for all of the fans out there!

    Oh, and if you haven't already, now is a great time to grab Maestro, NASA's public science tool for visualizing mars data (which I helped to develop).

    What a great night!

    Cheers,
    Justin Wick
    Science Activity Planner Developer
    Mars Exploration Rovers

    1. Re:Thanks from NASA by Minupla · · Score: 1

      Congrats on conquering the death planet :). Two for two. Nice job NASA/JPL!

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    2. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Congratulations on your recent score for Earth. Now we are only behind 17:20.

    3. Re:Thanks from NASA by blair1q · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Good on ya', Justin, but isn't it a bit premature to be calling this a success? I mean, look at Spirit, sitting a few feet from its pad wondering why there's a bowl of petunias and a sperm whale falling towards it. What I'm saying is, improbability has a way of creeping into every step of the process, and until these missions kick back some science with an order of magnitude deeper value than prior martian rovers, it really hasn't succeeded, has it?

      But still, woo-hoo on not exploding in a shower of sparks in the atmosphere, or getting wedged into a crag or eaten by a giant space slug or anything.

    4. Re:Thanks from NASA by QuantumFTL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good on ya', Justin, but isn't it a bit premature to be calling this a success?

      Though there are challenges on mars each new day, every inch of ground we take, every meter of atmosphere we penetrate, every bit of data sent back is indeed a success of modern science, engineering, and planning. There can be no doubt about this. Many critics of the space program (not that I suggest that you are one of them) do not realize the tremendous number of things that must go precisely right for a mission to go well.

      We have landed a working vehicle on mars, and have received communications from it. That alone is, without a doubt, worth celebrating.

      Yes there are many more things that must still be done, and perhaps we will fail at one or more of those. But tonight we have succeeded, and that cannot be taken away from us.

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick
      Science Activity Planner Developer
      Mars Exploration Rovers

    5. Re:Thanks from NASA by marcushnk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just to let you know what sort of effect you guys have on the world.. I'm watching your guys right now on live web cast.. from Perth in Western Australia, and I gotta say.. I'm damned impressed with your accomplishments..

      Well done guys and congrats..

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    6. Re:Thanks from NASA by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to let you know what sort of effect you guys have on the world.. I'm watching your guys right now on live web cast.. from Perth in Western Australia, and I gotta say.. I'm damned impressed with your accomplishments..

      Well done guys and congrats..


      Austrailia has been a wonderful friend to the US, and the Canberra installation has been invaluable to many space missions. Thanks for all your help from down under!

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick
      Science Activity Planner Developer
      Mars Exploration Rovers

    7. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mars rover mars rover explore my ass when i bend over!

    8. Re:Thanks from NASA by williwilli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good on ya', Justin, but isn't it a bit premature to be calling this a success? I mean, look at Spirit, sitting a few feet from its pad

      I guess that depends on what part of the software he wrote, the roving software or the reentry routines... ;)

      lots of free music downloads, plus games, recipes, and more

    9. Re:Thanks from NASA by hool5400 · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't count the failure of Beagle 2...

      --

      Remember, it takes 42 muscles to frown and only 4 to pull the trigger of a sniper rifle.
    10. Re:Thanks from NASA by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      I would like to thank you and your colleagues for making this happen! Every mission undertaken by the agency is a chance to excite, amaze, and educate everyone involved and onlookers, as well, and this mission is no different. Only with hard working and talented individuals like yourself can such feats be accomplished, and just as Columbus and Armstrong have gone down in history for their sense of adventure and for their accomplishments, the team that made these missions possible will also forever live on in the history books.

      Thanks and congrats!

    11. Re:Thanks from NASA by Docrates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, tell you what. The impact that this acomplishment is having ripples well beyond the US. I'm a Panamanian (from Panama in Central America, not the FL one) and I've been looking at the webcast all night (when NASA TV decides to broadcast since they cut off shortly after the thing landed instead of just letting the feed on)

      I've been following the whole thing very closely to a point where I've neglected some other duties. I'm just fascinated by it and would expect a hell of a lot of people all around the world feeling the same way.

      Congratulations and thanks on behalf of humanity.

      --

      There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
    12. Re:Thanks from NASA by identity0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Wait... I have a lower Slashdot number than the guy who put 2 rovers on Mars?

      WAHOOOOOOO!!

      Oh, and thanks for advancing mankind's knowledge of the universe ;-)

    13. Re:Thanks from NASA by tealover · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't happen to work for the ESA, would you?

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    14. Re:Thanks from NASA by JAYOYAYOYAYO · · Score: 1
      thanks for advancing mankind's knowledge of the universe ;-)

      my exact sentiments! talk about being fucking humbled when it comes to worthwhile contributions to mankind... for all the shit we give them, NASA et al really, truly fucking rock. rock on.

    15. Re:Thanks from NASA by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      no, thank you ;-) keep up the good work ;-)

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    16. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations! (An understatement...)

      -Did tweten@nas ever get Java working on FreeBSD? ;)

      -More seriously... Everyone's already unleashed their "Shouldn't have bought the CF off the clearance rack at Staples" jokes, but actual detail is hard to come by. Acknowledging that this is all the realm of theory, is it a better simplification to say you suspect a bug in Spirit's fsck_nasafs? Any 'pull' resources for us geeks, so we don't have to 'push' you on the subject and invoke further hair loss?

    17. Re:Thanks from NASA by vericgar · · Score: 1

      Yea... see what can happen when you don't sit around reading /. all day?

    18. Re:Thanks from NASA by djupedal · · Score: 1

      now is a great time to grab Maestro, NASA's public science tool for visualizing mars data (which I helped to develop).

      Justin...nice app.

      Can I ask a question? Why the shots with the backdrop, netting, etc? Baseline or?

    19. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a great lot of sucking up to Billg with downloads for ALL versions of Windoze, but you've only one version for the Mac, and this despite Xcode on your target platform, which can easily and effortlessly generate images for 10.1, 10.2, and 10.3.

      Very weak. Lame. Totally inexcusable. If this is your effort, then you cannot get a passing grade.

      We're very disappointed by this laziness and effrontery.

    20. Re:Thanks from NASA by MMHere · · Score: 1

      Congrats Jusin and colleagues!

      Shouldn't you be _working_ right now?

    21. Re:Thanks from NASA by RealUlli · · Score: 2, Informative
      But it doesn't count the failure of Beagle 2...

      Beagle 2 was just a (relatively) cheap addon to Mars Express. I don't remember the exact value, but I ssem to recall that the cost of beagle was less than 10% of the overall cost of the mission - the main goal was the cartography mission.

      Cheers, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    22. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no offense, but "Justin Wick" is a little sophomore guy, not really a noteworthy NASA representative or scientist. if you look at his website you can see that he loves attention. something to keep in mind.

    23. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please stop plugging these announcements with self promotional bits.

      I, Justin Wick, as someone who works at JPL (yes, I work at JPL) just want to thank the world for their support. We at NASA (I said WE which means I am included in that group), are happy about our accomplishments (I also helped with this landing). Thank you,

      Justin Wick
      NASA (yes I work at NASA)

    24. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seconded

    25. Re:Thanks from NASA by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Congrats on conquering the death planet :). Two for two. Nice job NASA/JPL!

      mars isn't the "death planet" - that moniker is reserved for venus:

      • surface temperature of 480c
      • surface pressure of 96x earth's
      • clouds of sulfuric acid

      now that's a death planet... and yet the soviets managed to drop a lander on it successfully way back in 1982 and even sent back some pictures

    26. Re:Thanks from NASA by cheekyboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      As a software engineer my self (unemployed thanks to greedy idiotic managers cancelling profitable projects while wasting $100m+ on new aquisitions) , Maestro sure does SUCK a lot of ram from the machine tho, but im guessing thats javas fault, since I am a c/c++ person my self. But hey, these days, whats another $100, it buys a hell lot of ram, though not when your not working, im just waiting to go to full 2gig once I work.

      A big hello to fellow .com CEOs who are living with millions of dollars... Bastards, God wont save you thats for sure.

      Time to write a specification for a W32.PhuKEtradeAccounts.Virus.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    27. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you really read his website, you'd realize he was a senior by now. Get a clue.

    28. Re:Thanks from NASA by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      We have landed a working vehicle on mars, and have received communications from it. That alone is, without a doubt, worth celebrating.

      Look, nobody's going to do any celebrating until you guys find a damn ocean of water so we can all get our free jumbo shrimp from Long John Silver's.

      PS: Just kidding, congrats. :-)

    29. Re:Thanks from NASA by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >> Good on ya', Justin, but isn't it a bit premature to be calling this a success?

      I think you'll be in a better position to judge this success after you've landed a vehicle on Mars yourself. Until then, STFU.

      And who modded this insightful? This is flamebait IMHO. Please mod accordingly.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    30. Re:Thanks from NASA by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      > But tonight we have succeeded, and that cannot be taken away from us.

      Sure as hell can't. Well done. Enjoy the postcards from Opportunity!

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    31. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, just when I was wondering when you would show up and speak on "behalf of NASA" again...

      Hey fuckers, where is the coffee you were supposed to have ready?

    32. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      karma whore faggot

    33. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A senior fucking college student!

    34. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey attention-seeking fucker, did you sneak into that room to take the picture of yourself after the real guy has done his presentation or what?

      You seem to demonstrate greate potential to become a credit-grabbing fucking manager...

    35. Re:Thanks from NASA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      until these missions kick back some science with an order of magnitude deeper value than prior martian rovers, it really hasn't succeeded, has it? But still, woo-hoo on not exploding in a shower of sparks....or eaten by a giant space slug or anything.

      But that *would* be big science if caught in the act of eating.

    36. Re:Thanks from NASA by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting


      mars isn't the "death planet" - that moniker is reserved for venus:

      Despite the heat and acid, Venus is actually *easier* to land on because the atomosphere is so thick that probes can almost float down as if under water. It would be like a gradual transition between our atmosphere and the ocean.

      The hard part of Venus is lasting, not landing.

    37. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly did you help with the landing? Cleaned the keyboard and plugged in the LCD projector!

      Fucktard, you talk like you were the fucking mission controller when in reality you were just a little twit doing a few lines of script here and there...

    38. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moderators this guy posts the same crap on every MER related story. He's a troll read his past msgs it's the same shit over and over again.

      Also the public version of meestro is a glorified piece of image viewer that would waste your time. It does absolutely NADA. It's better to download the raw images and play with gimp than use this bloated java fhawlagdwd.

    39. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello,

      I'm Justin Wick, I do not have an account on slashdot.org, but I see this person posting on slashtot.org using my name. I guess I have fans, it's amusing, but it's getting kinda boring.

      I just want you all to know that this is an imposter and not me, if you like to talk to me, come over to freenode's #maestro.

      Enjoy.

      Jus.

    40. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hhahahahaha... stop trolling fuck face and admit that you are just a boss cock sucking INTERN

    41. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just an intern on an ego trip, just ignore him and don't moderate his troll posts.

    42. Re:Thanks from NASA by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      IIRC the early Venus 'landers' never made it to the surface; their batteries ran out on the long slow float down...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    43. Re:Thanks from NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do a little bit a research on him, then you know he is really part of the project.

    44. Re:Thanks from NASA by ski2die · · Score: 1

      Hey if you guys at NASA ever needed confirmation of the awe the rest of the world feels for your work, here it is. I'm a graduate of a NASA summer school and a couple of Ivy League universities. I'm living in Canada now, and when prospective Canadian employers have seen my resume, they could care less about the Ivy League degrees, they want to know about the NASA summer school. "You were at NASA? Wow, that is so cool." You guys rock, keep up the good work. 500 years from now people will remember "America" for NASA more than anything else.

    45. Re:Thanks from NASA by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Celebrate away, but I guarantee your attitude of celebrating "every inch" is going to tire in the eyes of the people fronting your pay rather quickly.

      Space exploration isn't what it was. We landed rovers on Mars before. Do something new and it'll justify the outlandish expense. Pop the champagne because you pulled up your socks, and people will not be impressed.

    46. Re:Thanks from NASA by blair1q · · Score: 1

      See, now this is something.

      Exposed bedrock on another planet. No longer dealing with regolith, debris, and fragments of foreign bodies.

      Today, we celebrate together.

    47. Re:Thanks from NASA by kylegordon · · Score: 1

      If you look at the scientific tools carried on Spirit and Opportunity, and compare them to what was on Pathfinder, then I think you'll see that they _are_ doing something new.

    48. Re:Thanks from NASA by Cujo · · Score: 1

      Well, we landed one little rover on Mars before, and it was mainly a technology demonstration mission, paving the way for the two rovers on Mars now. The science on the current mission is front and center, and a lot more profound. If we hope to go fossil hunting on Mars, we need a much better idea of where to look (or even if there's any point).

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

  11. WOO HOO by dnahelix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yay

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  12. They didn't even lose the signal! by Robotbeat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apparently, they didn't lose the signal from the rover all the way down like they did on Spirit. The Deep Space Network was able to see the signal from all the way from chute opening to contact. Also, the "bouncing" (which really wasn't) look of the signal is because of interference between the two signals coming to earth from the rover. Since both signals are heard, they had a "beating" effect, like the sound of two notes that are almost, but not quite, the same, which caused the signal to appear to change amplitude in a regular, periodic pattern (which looks like it's rolling).

    1. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hope you aren't trying to imply that this is somehow faked, like how people foolishly think the moon landing was faked, in which case I would give you a lecture of how "rediculously ignorant that is" and how "we would be better if people didn't act as if everthing is a conspiracty."
      So, assuming that is NOT what you meant, I will give you a good answer:

      The Deep Space Network is a world-wide network of radio dishes that NASA uses for sending and receiving communications from (you guessed it) craft in deep space. Some of these dishes are 70 meters in diameter! NASA said that "all eyes are on Mars," refering to this network, so all the resources of this network were focused on Opportunity. Also, the Opportunity rover had been transmitting just a simple signal, not a complex TV signal. Therefore, using some pretty well-written signal processing software, the Opportunity rover's signal was recognized, yes, all the way from Mars. It's not an easy thing, as you seem to understand, but JPL and NASA and the folks from the DSN are quite capable and have years of experience with such things.

    2. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Correction: it was not 2 signals interfering it was the same signal taking two different paths to earth. One straight and one bouncing of the Mars surface.

      Said so on NASA TV.

    3. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Robotbeat said.. connect a 300 foot diameter dish on your tv and see if you cant get clear reception

    4. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

      True, but you could still pretend that is it two signals, since the "virtual" position of the bounced signal is in a different spacial position as the direct signal. Thanks for the clarification.

    5. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      pitty the polar lander didnt do such thing, now we have a mandated requirement, ie a must have for all landing probes.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    6. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I want to know is, how do they transmit signal through space with such clarity? I mean people watched the moon landing in the 60's, yet the west coast of my country can't even pickup TV reception clearly. Now we are to believe signal is coming from Mars?

      Good Question. What brand of television and antenna are they using for interplanetary communication? I got my antenna from Radio Shack but I don't get any signals from the rovers. Hmmm, I bet they are wasting our tax dollars on one of those digital cable hookups from Mars.

    7. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by bwy · · Score: 1

      It is worth noting (while on the topic) how overtasked the DSN apparently is right now. We're using it to keep track of everything from Voyager I & II to the Mars Rovers, including everything launched in between that is still functional and we want to keep track of. It becomes harder and harder to get a signal from the Voyager crafts, but it is worth it even for any trivial scientific data that can still be returned.

      You know I'm too cheap to get cable but I have a nice big set of rabbit ears I bought at Radio Shack. One of the local stations that is probably 20 miles away NEVER comes in with a clean signal. Apparently this is the one place where the space program has failed to offer better technology to the consumer market. You'd think someone could build a friggin' slightly stronger tuner for a TV! This technology doesn't seem to have improved at all in the last 15 years or more.

    8. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Robotbeat · · Score: 1

      That's a very good thing. I wasn't aware of the exact requirement. I think that NASA sure learned its lesson! It's really too bad the polar lander didn't work, though... I mean, I think it'd be pretty cool to see pictures of the polar ice and such. That being said, NASA had to get back on track with better quality stuff, not just scraping by. Scraping by just DOESN'T work in space!

    9. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      rediculously[sic] ignorant

      heh.

    10. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Apparently, they didn't lose the signal from the rover all the way down like they did on Spirit."

      I don't know the specifics, but I would imagine this would simply be because of where the earth was in the Martian sky where and when the two craft landed. If the earth was closer to the horizon for Opportunity than for Spirit., it amlost certainly wouldn't get obscured by the parachute.

    11. Re:They didn't even lose the signal! by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      You'd think someone could build a friggin' slightly stronger tuner for a TV!

      Tv tuners today are "state of the art" except maybe in the 99 dollar specials. To get a usable signal on ears from a full power station 20 miles away, please understand that your rabbit ears are not up sufficiently high to have any effect on the local manmade noises, and the thermal noise thats going to accompany the weak signal.

      If you want a decent signal, you are going to have to remove the ears, and place an outdoor antenna at a sufficient height, which will result in a quite a bit stronger signal, and do the reception at a distance that is going to be somewhat removed from most manmade noises, like the computer you are using to post your message. Its not the antenna (rabbit ears vs rooftop) but the signal to noise ratio. Moving 30 feet to get away from local noise can make a heck of a difference, particularly when that 30 feet is up.

      Cheers, Gene

  13. Re:Congradulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Love mars!

  14. I Love this by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the first time in my life I'm feeling completely amazed at the things we are finding out today. The space program is so exciting, finally we're pressing on to something we really don't know about. The re-envigorated space program, along with exciting news in robotics, make me feel like we're finally moving into the future.

    There's no point here, I just felt the need to gush

    --
    Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
    1. Re:I Love this by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Almost every space mission has brought back spectacular new findings, complete surprises and incredible images... Think of Voyager, the amazing pictures of the big planets, Apollo bringing back samples to determine the origin of the Moon, Giotto looking at Halley, Venera bringing back pictures from Venus, and so on...

      Still, the MER's are a tremendous achievement, and it is incredible that these days we can see the pictures coming in to a computer in mission control, LIVE on the internet! Woops, gotta go, next briefing is about to start :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    2. Re:I Love this by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1
      Almost every space mission has brought back spectacular new findings, complete surprises and incredible images... Think of Voyager, the amazing pictures of the big planets, Apollo bringing back samples to determine the origin of the Moon, Giotto looking at Halley, Venera bringing back pictures from Venus, and so on...

      I still remember some of the first probes to the moon (Ranger?), which were sent to simply crash on the moon and transmit photos on the way down. In those days, a letter to NASA would get you a thick envelope of 8x10 prints of the images. In its day, just as exciting as viewing these new images on my G5.

      Thanks and congrats to the folks at NASA/JPL, then and now! Looking forward to much more!

    3. Re:I Love this by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      For the first time in my life I'm feeling completely amazed at the things we are finding out today. The space program is so exciting, finally we're pressing on to something we really don't know about.

      Yes, but they keep cancelling and uncancelling the Pluto-Couper-belt mission. That mission has been ranked one of the top as far as fresh science is concerned. Plus, Pluto's atmosphere is going to freeze solid pretty soon because of its elliptical orbit. We won't be able to see it as air again for something like 200 years. All the other missions can be postponed except this one.

    4. Re:I Love this by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      There used to be a book available in the library, a couple decades ago, the official report of NASA on the Viking lander missions. It had tons of scientific data and hundreds of color and b/w photos. I spent many hours in the mid-80s pouring over that book, along with other such books.

      I have been unable to find it in the last 5 years. If libraries were getting rid of it, I must have missed the book sales. Dangit!

      The local librarian tells me they don't have the funding to buy such books anymore (I am sure they cost quite a bit to publish) ---

      so...

      DONATE to your local library. Please. Suggest the purchase of the book, and follow it up with some $$$. There are many kids who will not have the opportunity to read things like this unless the volumes are available (yeah, internet, blah blah - if you aren't aware it exists, you aren't going to read it. The internet is a big place. )

      One unofficial way to donate is to check out rarely used books and pay the late fees :) They're not in demand, so you're not keeping someone else from reading them; but you *are* letting the library know that *someone* wants them (so they keep them on the shelves) and late fees are a form of donation....

      Cheers
      SB
      $349.34 donated to local libraries in 2003

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  15. Bouncing by loconet · · Score: 5, Informative

    More information on BBC and Space.com.

    NASA TV is also broadcasting the Opportunity briefing with NASA officers as well as EDL Developers. A must see for interesting facts on what happened during entry.

    To the people responsible for this great achievment once again, great work guys and thank you.

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:Bouncing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know why BBC consistently spells NASA like a word - Nasa? Is there some Brit-english word Nasa that means something?

    2. Re:Bouncing by October_30th · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know why BBC consistently spells NASA like a word - Nasa? p Maybe BBC has a lameness filter too: "DO NOT USE SO MANY CAPS - IT'S LIKE SHOUTING!"

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
  16. Hematite by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK... Anyone with scientific knowledge care to indicate how hematite in an area indicates the past presence of water? I'm fascinated, but clueless.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Hematite by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I believe that there are about 4 to 6 different ways of forming hematite. All but one happen only in the presence of water. The other way is through vulcanic means. With the vast assortment of tools on these rovers, it should be definitely possible to find out whether it was formed vulcanically or not. So, there you go!

    2. Re:Hematite by marcushnk · · Score: 2, Informative

      from Nasa

      http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/spotlight/hematit e0 1.html

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    3. Re:Hematite by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google told me about this Powerpoint, from the horse's mouth. Apparently, the conceivable mechanisms for hematite formation are:

      I) Chemical precipitation - extensive near-surface water

      1) Precipitation from ambient, Fe-rich water (oxide iron formations)

      2) Precipitation from hydrothermal fluids

      3) Low-temperature dissolution and precipitation through mobile groundwater leaching

      4) Surface weathering and coatings

      II) Thermal oxidation of magnetite-rich lava

      I guess it's just that many of the possible mechanisms for hematite formation involve the presence of water. Though I guess thermal oxidation of magnetite in lava doesn't necessarily. Presumably they want to either rule that possibility out or identify whether the hematite in fact indicates recent or distant past presence of liquid water in the area.

    4. Re:Hematite by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      The other way is through vulcanic means.

      Perhaps we should be asking Spock about all this then.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    5. Re:Hematite by Nichen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hematite is formed by sediments. Since a primary way of sediment creation is by water, it stands to reason that the presence of hematite is a possibility that water is/was there. I don't really know the mechanics of how it's formed (not a geologist), but from it's molecular formula of Fe2O3, I'd imagine that the water combines with iron to form it.

      Some links about hematite's composition and how NASA thinks it'll lead to indications of water existence:
      http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y200 1/ast28mar_1 .htm
      http://www.mindat.org/min-1856.html
      http:// www.minerals.net/mineral/oxides/hematite/he matite.htm

      --
      Demona's Law - "User data expands to exceed available bandwidth." ("User data" being pr0n, mp3's, vob's,
    6. Re:Hematite by core+plexus · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm an exploration geologist, so I may be qualified.

      When acid-rich water comes in contact with sulfidic rock Fe bearing bodies, such as pyrites, it takes up some of the iron (leaching), which water then, being iron laden, comes into contact with a favorable deposition environment, then then iron drops out. Geochemistry is very complicated here on Earth, and I'd love to get a chance at some off-world geology.

      On Earth, there is a suggested analog: THE TINTO RIVER BASIN: AN ANALOG FOR MERIDIANI HEMATITE FORMATION ON MARS? (*.PDF)

      Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    7. Re:Hematite by kfg · · Score: 1

      Kinda like making rock candy, only harder on the teeth, not to mention the funny iron oxide aftertaste.

      When I was a kid learning about crystal formation by precipitaion from a solution was taught this way in grade school. Do they still do this or has sugar become too politically incorrect?

      KFG

    8. Re:Hematite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can find Spock here these days. Why, I saw him there on TV just earlier tonight!

    9. Re:Hematite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Kirk, not Spock, dipshit.

    10. Re:Hematite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTFC (Watch The Fucking Commercial). Nimoy appears in it.

      Does it give you a chubby when you call someone "dipshit"?

    11. Re:Hematite by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      One item I find interesting is that gold in solution with water will precipitate out in fractures in iron pyrites, under favorable conditions. Gold is very effective in blocking radiation, which will be required for any manned mission. If Gold Meteorites Bombarded Young Planet Earth, perhaps they also might be found on other planets.

      Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    12. Re:Hematite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except neutron radiation, not very good at that. Water (due to H) is much better.

    13. Re:Hematite by AntonVoyl · · Score: 1
      If it's off-world then it's not GEOlogy. Perhaps "areology" would best describe what NASA's doing through those rovers?


      Don't worry, plenty of spacefaring species make that mistake when they're taking their first steps. . . though you should be warned that the Martians are rather touchy about semantics.

      --

      sig semper tyrannis!
    14. Re:Hematite by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      In my experience, hematite usually indicates the presence of New Age shops with all those polished stones.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    15. Re:Hematite by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      Wait...so We found what USED to be an ocean? Free jumbo shrimp everybody!!

    16. Re:Hematite by neodymium · · Score: 1

      some of these mechanisms are probable on earth, but not on mars. the athmosperic conditions on mars are slightly reducing (chemically speaking), so there is not a big chance for thermal oxidation. sure, they changed in the last few billion years, but I assume any precipitation reaction is more feasible...

  17. No thanks from Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as a software engineer on MER, I must say that I and my collegues are all thrilled to see yet another success!

    As a martian, I would like to ask what the hell are you doing, dumping this big airbag robot thing in my backyard? You scared my kids half to death!

    Are you going to just leave this thing here? This is private property!

    - Z't'har q.d

    1. Re:No thanks from Mars by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Funny
      Are you going to just leave this thing here? This is private property!


      As soon as we finish drilling in your rock garden we'll roam off. Keep the heat shield and air bag with our compliments.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  18. And in other news by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Some junior officer of the Martian Interplanetary Defense Force just got evaporated via Phaser Death Squad for failing to down the extraterrestial invasion craft.

  19. Unexpected discovery on Mars? by salmonz · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was watching the NASA TV live and there was an unexpected discovery on Mars. A few minutes went by and they showed a video with the Rover, and then an animation made presented a birthday cake for Sean O'Keefe. THIS REALLY SCRARED THE HECK OUT ME. I thought it was small little green men roaming around Mars. This scared everyone and especially almost gave Sean a heart-attack.

    1. Re:Unexpected discovery on Mars? by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

      Almost as great as the look on his face when they gave him the Lego set. (I want that Lego set.) Love that NASA TV. And no cutaways to Nicole Kidman, unless she turns out to be an extraterrestial. Which is a thought.

      It's a great day to be a geek and open to joy.

    2. Re:Unexpected discovery on Mars? by Burstgoof · · Score: 1

      I saw that too. Thought they were going to announce some catostrophic event... like "we just realized that Opportunity landed on top of Spirit..."

    3. Re:Unexpected discovery on Mars? by salmonz · · Score: 1

      Btw, it's Sean O'Keefe's birthday in two days. They pulled the joke on him and on everyone else to releive some the stress and the seriousness of this mission. I must say, I was convinced at first something out of the ordinary happened on Mars, like those green aliens on Mars Attacks where on camera saying *NAH'T NAH'T NAH'T*. It's good to know that NASA has a great sense of humor, especially when the whole world is watching. :)

  20. How to deal with time lag by DakotaSandstone · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is just awesome. I watched the whole thing unfold on NASA TV.

    But you know, the whole time lag thing kept sticking in my mind... When you hear them say "We have landed on Mars," that event actually happened 10 minutes earlier that the telemetry indicates it did.

    What's the best way for humans to deal with the inescapable fact of the speed of light here? Should we report things (for the history books and all) as happening 10 minutes earlier than they appear to?

    Aw, heck, what do I know? I'm still weirded out by the 7 second delay on radio. :) Go NASA!

    --
    Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
    1. Re:How to deal with time lag by Hello+Kitty · · Score: 1

      Heh. Even better than the look on his face when they gave him the Lego set. Love that NASA TV, especially when it doesn't cut to interviews with Nicole Kidman.

      It's a great day to be a geek, and open to joy. Now, anyone on the inside want to tell us about the petal mechanism and how that's expected to go? This is a first, right?

    2. Re:How to deal with time lag by WhiteBandit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well the 7 second delay you are speaking of in terms of radio is artificially induced to catch callers and other people on the air from using swear words or anything else deemed inappropriate by the FCC.

      A comparison I heard fairly recently while studying radio waves and the speed of light:

      If there was a symphony being performed at Carnegie Hall (New York City) and it was being broadcast live over the radio, someone listening to the performance on the radio in Los Angeles would actually hear the sound before someone sitting in the back of Carnegie Hall! Interesting take on speed of light versus speed of sound.

      Anyway, this was slightly off topic. Forgive me ;)

    3. Re:How to deal with time lag by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Cool. Next time I go to a concert that's being broadcast, I'm gonna pack a radio receiver so I can be the first in my aisle with the sound.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:How to deal with time lag by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      There's only one thing that example overlooks - there is no straight-line path from New York to LA that a radio signal can follow. So either the signal would have to be carried over terrestrial fiber (and thus travel at about 60-70% of the speed of light due to the refractive index of the fiber) or bounce off a sat and incur 44,000 miles of delay.

    5. Re:How to deal with time lag by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      There's only one thing that example overlooks - there is no straight-line path from New York to LA that a radio signal can follow. So either the signal would have to be carried over terrestrial fiber ... or bounce off a sat and incur 44,000 miles of delay.

      Or bounce off the ionosphere (wavelength and atmospheric conditions permitting).

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
    6. Re:How to deal with time lag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but what exactly is the time delay? Is it on the order of several minutes, or half an hour or more?

      Also, what does this delay mean for tracking? During the broadcast I've heard several times they lost the signal due to bouncing and movement of the MER while landing, but with any serious time delay how does tracking that accurate happen anyway?

  21. You's the force... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1, Funny
    California's governor Arnold Schwarzenegger...

    I'm assuming he was present because they used his Schwartz to power the rover, correct?

    --
    True story.
    1. Re:You's the force... by lgftsa · · Score: 1

      Now they've slowed down from Ludicrous Speed and landed safely, they can begin combing the desert.

    2. Re:You's the force... by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      and hopefully wont run into any, um, spaceballs...

  22. Ahem... by Locky · · Score: 4, Funny

    While overseeing the landing of Oppurtunity, Al Gore quipped to the NASA engineers that he actually invented the propulsion engine.

    1. Re:Ahem... by bullitB · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait a minute. Before anyone else corrects you, I think I should.

      Al Gore only said he took the initiative in creating the propulsion engine. And a very high up guy who once worked at JPL but now works as a stock option holder at a large defense contractor can back that up.

    2. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now O'keefe is giving credit with a "we" (even though he had absolutly nothing to do with it) and will on Feb 3 be making an annoucement that will most likely take funding away from JPL and missions such as these. Of course, pass the blame around for failures such as challenger.

      Hopefully the W admin will at least spend more money on robotics to do in-ground construction.

    3. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant mod, what the fuck are you mods smoking? This was the first 'Gore invented' joke on the thread.

    4. Re:Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Redundant mod, what the fuck are you mods smoking? This was the first 'Gore invented' joke on the thread.

      Maybe they meant redundant in the sense that the same stupid joke has been told a million fucking times.

    5. Re:Ahem... by irhtfp · · Score: 1
      From Spaceflightnow:

      0506 GMT (12:06 a.m. EST)
      After a short loss of signal from the rover, a strong signal is now being received as Opportunity arrives on Mars!

      0508 GMT (12:08 a.m. EST)
      A good signal is still being received! Unlike the Spirit landing where signal was lost immediately after touchdown, Opportunity continues to talk to Earth.

      0508 GMT (12:08 a.m. EST)
      Complete joy and relief in Mission Control as Opportunity has landed at Meridiani Planum.

      0510 GMT (12:11 a.m. EST)
      Former Vice President Al Gore is in Mission Control.

      We vicariously travel 300 million miles and spend $400+ million dollars to hit a speck of dust with an 11,000+ MPH bullet to see if, just maybe, we can find a Martian... and then one shows up in mission control!

      Zoiks!

      Congrats NASA!

      --
      I've made up my mind and now I've got to lie in it.
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Whew! by dedazo · · Score: 1
    I thought it was going to crash into Beagle, which obviously parked on the wrong side of the orbit channel.

    [apologies to my brit friends]

    Now we can be amused by another batch of Mars landscape pictures with Wal-Mart and McDonald's signs Photoshopped into them. Isn't science great!?

    But seriously, kudos unlimited to NASA. It was about time they got a friggin' break.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  25. Semi-hourly Topic Overlay Joke by zhenlin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Replica of Mars Rover Opportunity made of Lego Modified to Contain a 2004 PC in a 1984 Mac Stops Responding, Debugging Dumps Indicate Possible Flaw in Linux InstantOn Boot Loader and/or Flash Controller.

    1. Re:Semi-hourly Topic Overlay Joke by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Replica of Mars Rover Opportunity made of Lego Modified to Contain a 2004 PC in a 1984 Mac Stops Responding, Debugging Dumps Indicate Possible Flaw in Linux InstantOn Boot Loader and/or Flash Controller.

      The IE bug (much talked about at LinuxWorld 2004) was used to spoof the Opportunity's man page, resulting in it being frozen in carbonite. Film at 11.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  26. Gov Schwarzenegger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its nice to have someone who has actually been to Mars congratulate the team at JPL. I'm sure he has lots of stories to share.

    1. Re:Gov Schwarzenegger by Rallion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, man. This is making me laugh so hard, now that I've gotten to thinking about it. I can just imagine him standing there, looking at screens...beginning to get angry..."Yowa rova is wrong! That is not Maarz!"

    2. Re:Gov Schwarzenegger by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but will the blood veins stand out as he screams that?

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  27. flip side by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The landing procedures achieved a best-case scenario" and the worst case.... landing directly onto Spirit

    1. Re:flip side by bluewee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, Landing directly onto Spirit is not that bad, but Landing directly onto Spirit, thus causing the axis of mars to change, which moves it into a orbit that causes it directly smash into earth in six to nine months.

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    2. Re:flip side by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could ricochet off of the European orbiter and hit Spirit. That would be awesome.

      -B

    3. Re:flip side by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      And then Spirit would bounce into higher atmosphere, then fall back exactly one meter away from Beagle 2 - thus blowing off the memory of the probe and rearranging its bits into a completely random fashion...
      But wait, the newly rearranged bits would actually produce a valid program ! And all of a sudden Beagle 2 would start emitting again ! And somewhere in French Guyana, a scientist would receive the following signal:

      "BGL2 SCO UnixWare Login:_"

      Thomas Miconi

    4. Re:flip side by madpierre · · Score: 1

      2004 "The landing procedures achieved a best-case scenario"

      Whew. What happened to plain old ....

      1969 "Eagle has landed"

      Not one of the engineers on the Spirit/Opportunity teams sported a pocket protector. How times change *sigh* :)

      Is it just me, but looking at the pictures Opportunity sent back. Has it landed in some sort of shallow depression or small crater? That outcrop could be part of a craters rim.

      --
      siggy played guitar
  28. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah moderators, rate the parent offtopic. Because, ya know...lego art is soooo ON-TOPIC when you just landed on mars.

    News for Nerds....no kidding.

  29. Re:You pee! by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 0

    I, too, would like to take this opportunity to thank those involved in the project.

    --
    True story.
  30. Congrats! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    Way to go NASA! WOOT! And another win against the Mars Defense System(TM).

    Go find those Beagle pieces, little rovers!

  31. Reality Check by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll
    And what will we do with this information? Water on Mars, fantastic. Perhaps we will find evidence of microbes, like there was ever any question that life on Earth is unique. This information will indeed serve mankind well, feeding the bums that live on our streets, and cure people of hate. So when you get pulled over for not being a member of some popular political party, or next year when GWB tells you your taxes are going up because the "terrorists" are at our doorsteps, just say FABULUS! NASA is doing great. And when the RAII gives you a call because you have 10,000 downloads, just quote this Slashdot article, they will know that YOU are in the "know".

    The great thing about this is that it proves that innovation and thought still has some place in government. These vehicles where built with the tax dollars that you and I give away every year. It's a shame that our money is not spent in ways like this rather than (for example) the "war on terrorism" and the "war on drugs".

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Reality Check by nuclear305 · · Score: 0

      While I may not fully understand your rambling, and ignoring all possible sarcasm...

      Exactly how much more money would you like to spend on the "war on terrorism" and the "war on drugs" You reach a point of diminishing returns where money spent doesn't get you anywhere in the end.

      This aside, science is science; it shouldn't be tied to politics. Proof of water on mars obviously has no impact on politics; but it still has scientific value...especially if we intend to locate life elsewhere.

      Besides, what if we're really martians and don't know it yet?

    2. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to say that NASA is ...a competent government organization? Crazy as it sounds, I think I agree.

    3. Re:Reality Check by BTWR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your resoning is flawed:

      1. Let's say, for argument's sake, there was no 9/11 and no subsequent wars. We'd have (at least) $87 billion more in the budget. So in that parallel universe you believe that homeless people are all living in co-ops?

      2. I do believe there were quite a few impoverished people before the founding of NASA. The creation of NASA did not take a sandwich out of a homeless guy's hand.

      3. Velcro, GPS, Cellular Telephones, discovery of the ozone hole which arguably launched the widespread efforts to fix our planet, Tang :), and rocketry as a whole were all results of NASA innovations (not to mention within-the-next-decade cancer drugs and other crystaline drugs they are experimenting with in zero G on the ISS eventually). And no, we didn't decide to send men to the moon to create pocket-phones, but low and behold it's an offshoot. Who can possibly tell what else we have to find out there?

      4. And... does everything in your mind have to deal with profit? So, if we find unlimited diamonds and platinum on Mars/Asteroids/etc, then it's worth it? If it's "just a few microbes thus PROVING we are not the only inhabited planet in the universe" then it's no big deal?

      5. Lastly (I could be wrong on this one - if this is the one I mess up then fine), I believe GWB wants to lower taxes (not that I agree with lowering them either, but I'm just correcting you on that...)

    4. Re:Reality Check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALERT: Money is just paper or metal (and nowadays ones and zeroes). No, really. Its worth is basically imagined. If we can turn pieces of paper into long distance battle bots (but without the fun smashing part - except Beagle) which make nerds wet their pants, well what the hell. Do I think we will learn much of value here? No. Although if NASA ever plays Who Let the Dogs Out again to celebrate anything, I am completely in favor of revoking all of their funding.

    5. Re:Reality Check by vt0asta · · Score: 1

      Finally, one of your posts gets moderated correctly.

      This is a job well done largely by NASA, who is appropriated by the US Government, and financed by the US tax payers. Yes, the US tax payers paid for it, but that's a good thing. With the constant railing about how awful the US is, NASA is again the beacon of light (that it has been in the past) to many who still loves the US.

      However, should you want to put down the politics, then pick up a pocket protector. Science wins again this time, be proud instead of taking an "opportunistic jab". I'm still hoping Beagle2 (through some miracle) gasps out something.

      --
      No.
  32. w00t! by Jaysyn · · Score: 0, Redundant

    w00t!

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  33. First Step in Terraforming: by tekrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I kep thinking about those "airbags". Are they filled with "air", and if so, perhaps we can send a lot more probes to Mars, and sooner or later we'll have sent enough "air" there to start breathing!

    I still think they should have sent some kudzu to Mars. Then, by the time that Man actually gets there, he won't need a helmet.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:First Step in Terraforming: by bluewee · · Score: 1

      I would expect it to probably be filled with either some inert gas, or something like CO2, because it is highly compressable.

      --
      [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
    2. Re:First Step in Terraforming: by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      I think 50 100megatonne NUKES over the polar caps would cause some melting, and throw another 50 into the Volcano Olympus mons down its hole, those whoppers make a big punch, so 1 at a time down the hole 1 day apart, or 50 around the poles. :)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:First Step in Terraforming: by Penguinshit · · Score: 1



      Tossing nukes into an extinct volcano...

      You aren't by any chance a Scientologist, are you?

  34. Build your own Rover, sweet Lego kit! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Interesting
    http://shop.lego.com/

    Click on the rover picture on the upper right hand corner, or search for the work "Rover" on the site and choose the third link. Very cool Lego rover kit for about $80.

    1. Re:Build your own Rover, sweet Lego kit! by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Funny
      Click on the rover picture on the upper right hand corner, or search for the work "Rover" on the site and choose the third link. Very cool Lego rover kit for about $80.

      They gave one of these as a birthday present to Sean O'Keefe during the 1:30am EST news briefing. There were jokes about keeping him away from the real hardware.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:Build your own Rover, sweet Lego kit! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      Thats where I say the thing! Live on the webcast. I then hit lego.com 10 seconds later and bought the thing. Impulse buy. The joke about keeping him away from the real thing so they got him a Lego one was way funny. Almost laughed coffee though my nose.

  35. Signal Bounce? by bluewee · · Score: 1

    When I was reading the Summary, it seems like the signal was bouncing off something, because I got some repititon in there...

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  36. Clever tactics by wrmrxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA have employed a very cunning plan - send Spirit as a decoy, wait until they're sure the Martian army are screwing around with it, then land Opportunity on the opposite side of the planet.

    1. Re:Clever tactics by zome · · Score: 4, Funny

      If those martians fall for this, then it's obviously they've never played Warcraft II.

    2. Re:Clever tactics by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Funny!

      btw you have my vote for coolest UID#

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  37. Errr... by calmdude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now what does a hermaphrodite have to do with finding water? Oh ... wait, never mind.

  38. Ugh, premature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm as stoked about this as anybody, but geez... maybe they'd better wait and make sure the petals open, everything works, first photos back, etc. It's a little early to be pouring the champagne.

  39. Fresh crater by photonic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Congrats to JPL, i can't wait till the pictures arrive in a few hours. I am now watching the briefing on NasaTV and it seems they landed some 24 miles downrange from bullseye, probably not because of navigation error, but a due to strong winds. This is still ok for the science, which is aimed mainly at a region of some odd minerals that have something to do with water.

    Slightly OT from the Opportunity landing, but has anybody seen the amazing picture made by Mars Global Surveyor? They not only can see Spirit itself from orbit, they also located several bounce marks, the parachute, the backshell and the heatshield! I have to look up the resolution again, but judging from this picture they achieve better than 1 meter after some image processing.

    These pictures gave me the following idea (assuming Spirit will get healthy soon): Since the plan was to drive to big crater in the top right of the first image anyhow, why not drive to the impact location of the heatshield. Since this came down without a parachute, it should have dug a pretty deep hole. It is thus possible to study a fresh crater that is only 1 month old!

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    1. Re:Fresh crater by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Great pictures... Unfortunate that it doesn't show the scale. How far from the lander to that crater?

      From earlier reports, the lander stopped about 330 meters from the first bounce, so the crater is within 500 meters of it, eminently reachable if they get the rover problems fixed soon.( Just don't touch that heatshield if it's still hot! Tssssss!!.... "Houston, we have another problem..") On the other hand, NASA would certainly want to avoid any unnecessary source of non-Martian contamination, heat-sterilized or not. Best to keep looking for them good old-fashioned "organic" Martian craters.

      Still, I'd be in favor of at least driving close enough to get a decent look. Who knows what they might dig up?..

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    2. Re:Fresh crater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Those are impressive pictures.

      With the sort of resolution that's being achieved, would it be crazy to look for Beagle?

      It's an idea that gets floated around on slashdot whenever hi-res pictures are shown, but really--those pictures are impressive. You can make out the shapes of things--they're not just one-pixel blips.

    3. Re:Fresh crater by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looking for Beagle (or any other lost craft, like the polar lander) is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Sure, they *can* zoom in on Spirit far enough to see parts and impacts and whatnot - but that's because they know exactly where it is. The probable area you'd have to search to find Beagle is massive (especially if something went wrong). Its not like you can take a wide angle shot and go "oh, there it is, zoom in on that" either. They'd need to cover every square inch of the possible landing sites with their highest resolution shots - something that could take years.
      We probably will find Beagle eventually, but probably not with the cameras we have up there currently. The little lost puppy will just have to sit it out for a decade or ten.

    4. Re:Fresh crater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two landers are supposed to travel 1200ft. combined.

      500 meters seems a bit out of range, especially since they already have mission goals and one crippled rover.

    5. Re:Fresh crater by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, run some awesome software, or do a metalic radar test, or do a 500meterx500meter image and get 100000s of studends to check 1 each every 5mins and report back, just like SETI.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    6. Re:Fresh crater by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like that would be a lot of work to find the location of some broken equipment!

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    7. Re:Fresh crater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you're right in some ways.

      But it's not just "some broken equipment", it's a very sophisticated mars probe. I bet the individuals working on the Beagle project would like to know what happened.

      And every bit of knowledge about failure helps prevent it from happening again. It would be helpful, for example, if you could identify Beagle as being in one piece.

      It wouldn't be easy, that's for sure. But it might be possible.

      There are always individuals who want to demystify tragedies of the past. I mean, think about all the individuals who go to the deepest parts of the sea, at significant expense, to figure out what went wrong in marine tragedies.

    8. Re:Fresh crater by johnjay · · Score: 1

      Although the heat shield would have gouged a pretty good hole in the surface, I think there might be contamination issues with looking at that site.

      1 The elements found at the site might be from the heat shield, not Mars.

      2 The compounds may have been created by the heat/pressure of the heat shield's impact, not natural causes.

      I'm sure a smart scientist could figure out ways to answer these questions, but they'd have to be careful with every bit of data from the heat shield site.

    9. Re:Fresh crater by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Depends on what they find. If they see Beagle sitting there in one piece, with obvious evidence that it successfully did all automatic landing procedures, deployed the antennas, they know that the problem is in the radio. (and might even be able to give it some commands to see if it is just a sending problem?) Taht is very useful and tells which engineers screwed up. Otoh, if they just find a lot of derbis that tells them the landing failed. If it broke in half, they know what parts broke, and thus where more quality control is needed next time.

      All useful information. Just looking at the pictures allows some calculations to be made.

    10. Re:Fresh crater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know exactly where Beagle is. It's over here. And over there. And over there...

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. I had a "rover opportunity" in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I really don't like banging ugly chicks.

  42. Re:You mean by nukem1999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But a no-fault tone is not a fault tone, so they received both no-fault tones and no fault tones.

  43. Re:You mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my brain hurts

  44. Re:please mod parent down by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why? All I'm saying is that it's interesting that with the "success" rate of landing craft on Mars, our (US) last two attempts seem to so far have worked. Looks like we finally may have gotten it right. Now of course we can start to build off this and make a landing craft for manned exploration.

    I think the EU just needs more practice. We lost one back in 1997, now look at us. Hopefuly the EU will finally get a robot on the surface successfully. I think this news article just goes to show that, I think, our hard work is paying off.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Re:So, this makes what? by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Actually, if you count the Beagle, Arianne, and Columbia, this would be:

    US +1, EU -2

  47. martains by tudobem7051 · · Score: 1

    methinks the two rovers are REALLY there to mate and CREATE martians....

    1. Re:martains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Close. They did generate a helluva lot of martinis tonight.. on Earth!

      Good Job, JPL!

  48. Schwarzenegger: "GET YOUR ASS TO MARS" by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 4, Funny

    As Gov. Schwarzenegger watched the landing from JPL, he commanded the scientists: "GET YOUR ASS TO MARS!"

    A reporter reminded Gov. Schwarzenegger that "You blabbed Quaid! You blabbed about Mars!" Schwarzenegger ignored the remark, responding "I've never even been to Mars! What the fuck did I do wrong?"

    Later that evening, Schwarzenegger pleaded with Cohaagen to increase the oxygen ration on Mars, by saying: "Giff des people eair!!"

    Finally, he shot his wife, Sharon Stone, through the head, closing the press conference by saying "Consider dat a divorce!!!"

    1. Re:Schwarzenegger: "GET YOUR ASS TO MARS" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I wish I had points. Sure you've just taken some very appropriate lines from Total Recall, but goddamn it's funny. :)

  49. Something to watch out for by slobber · · Score: 1

    Since the Opportunity's hardware is identical to Spirit, it has on average 19 days before freaking out.

    It is good that Spirit's problem seems to be under control, so if something similar happens to Opportunity, the cure is already avaliable.

    --
    "You mortals are so obtuse." -Q
  50. Most excitement in a while by azpcox · · Score: 1

    My wife and I caught the web cast and even she was excited as the Flight controller, Wayne Lee, was reading from the expected sequence of events. Very cool!

    The question I had was since there is ten minutes from Mars to here for the radio signals, his sequence had to be ten minutes behind what was actually happening. Listening to the DSN "voice" confirming that some action had happened based on a doppler shift was amazing as well. So were they working ten minutes behind the actual sequence of events?

    --
    What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
  51. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Burstgoof · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just finished watching the press briefing on NASATV. I gotta say it's pretty damn neat to see these engineers and scientists realize the fruit of their labors. Congratulations to JPL, NASA, and anyone involved in landing both rovers on Mars. And thanks, too, because it's rekindled the young, bewildered, excited curiosity in me.

  52. I know I shouldn't respond to trolls, but... by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (a) If there's life on Mars, of course it will be different from life on Earth -- but we will still want to know HOW it's different. It would be like never travelling to a foreign country because you already know the USA (or whatever your home country is) is unique.

    (b) GWB will never "tell you your taxes are going up." He'll "pay" for the "war on terrorism" by cutting taxes, not raising them.

    (c) s/RAII/RIAA

    (d) What does funding NASA have to do with political oppression?

    (e) I agree with the 2nd paragraph. I'd like to add that I predict we will have cities on Mars (and the Opportunity landing site will be a historical monument, admission $5, kids under 12 and seniors $2, or free with a National Parks Pass or Golden Age Passport) before we win either the war on drugs or the war on terrorism.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  53. Re:So, this makes what? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1

    Well, if you really want to keep score, dont forget about the polar landers, 3 failures in one fell swoop....

  54. JPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will the JPL stand up in a real court? I am waiting to see how this SCO case goes. ;-)

  55. Spare Parts by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Funny
    On a more serious note, could future unmanned and manned missions take advantage of the stuff we have dropped on Mars? Send up a collection bot, hopefully it won't crash, and then it collects all the parts while mapping/surveying, and then another bot lands and builds something out of the parts. I ask this because any little nut and bolt is extremely valuable in proportion to the distance from a replacement. After paying $400 for some bolts to be brought to a remote location, I can't guess what a good screw would be worth on Mars.

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    1. Re:Spare Parts by spare.dave · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I can't guess what a good screw would be worth on Mars" After a few months in space, all alone on another planet with no way off... Tell me, in those conditions what WOULDN'T a good fsck be worth?

    2. Re:Spare Parts by wildsurf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can't guess what a good screw would be worth on Mars.

      "Oh goody! My Dildonium Q36 explosive space copulator!"

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    3. Re:Spare Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like the filesystem on Spirit's flash memory is corrupted - it's just been a few weeks on Mars, and it already desperate for a fsck!

    4. Re:Spare Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will probably costs less to send more
      probes than to send a robot to build probes
      from that junk

      --
      john@pdiaz.homeunix.net - don't mail here,
      its a s.p.a.m.b.o.t trap

    5. Re:Spare Parts by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On a more serious note, could future unmanned and manned missions take advantage of the stuff we have dropped on Mars? Send up a collection bot, hopefully it won't crash, and then it collects all the parts while mapping/surveying, and then another bot lands and builds something out of the parts.

      I think a better idea is to leave all those old probes exactly where they lay. Being the optimist that I am about space exploration, I really believe we'll eventually colonize the planet. If this is the case, I'd like the old landing sites to be preserved just as they are. Perhaps build space history museums around them, or some of them can become part of the town square or something of a community.

      Naturally this assumes that Mars is not too harsh on these old probes and there will be something left to look at, since it will likely take a long while before colonization of the planet becomes technologically and economically feasible.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    6. Re:Spare Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't guess what a good screw would be worth on Mars.

      [Joke goes here]

    7. Re:Spare Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good fuck on Mars would be worth 5 - 10 bucks considering how horribly ugly the female astronauts have been in the past and will probably continue to be in the foreseeable future.

    8. Re:Spare Parts by imroy · · Score: 1
      I think a better idea is to leave all those old probes exactly where they lay. [...] I'd like the old landing sites to be preserved just as they are. Perhaps build space history museums around them, or some of them can become part of the town square or something of a community.

      Similarly, I've often wondered what would eventually happen to the moon landing sites. Perhaps a bubble or something could be constructed over each one. Imagine in 100 years, one could visit the tranquility museum and still see the base of the Eagle landing craft and the astronauts' footprints. The only problem with the footprints might be the need to protect them from vibrations, both natural (moon-quakes) and man-made. I imagine vibrations from surrounding construction efforts could smooth-out the prints made in the fine dust. They might have to be carefully dug-out with a large slab of surrounding ground and mounted on vibration-dampeners in order to keep the fragile footprints more-or-less intact.

    9. Re:Spare Parts by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Don't have to worry about moon-quakes, the moon is geologically inert. Though you will need to watch out for the occasional impact from space debris.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    10. Re:Spare Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling that would have been much funnier if you'd, I don't know, actually written something funny.

    11. Re:Spare Parts by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Well, stripping them for parts isn't a bad idea, however, actually planning on doing so is a differnt story entirely.

      We don't know what effect Mars will have on the equipment, how it will deteriorate over time or anything like that.

  56. Re:Petals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pathfinder and Spirit both used a petal arrangement. Out of chance, this is the first one to _not_ land on the base petal, so it will have to right itself by unfolding.

  57. Transcend humanity on Earth first. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 0

    Instead of sending mechanical rovers out, why not send a conscious machine? The uploading of the self into a machine is a far greater goal than space exploration, and doable on Earth.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  58. Wanna know what I think? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find all this Mars coverage to be a pleasant distraction from the redundant SCO nonsense. I hope NASA starts testing their warp drive soon.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Wanna know what I think? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Maybe we'll get lucky & they'll discover a FTL drive that uses lawyers for fuel.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:Wanna know what I think? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I hope NASA starts testing their warp drive soon"

      Something like that migh tactually cause Microsoft sensationalism to go extinct for a few days!

    3. Re:Wanna know what I think? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      You mean that microsoft apologists might actually admit that their products are more difficult to secure and remotely administer by design? Or are you just tired of people pointing out that your chosen platform is far from perfect, or even good in many cases?

      And to answer your sig,

      "Linux: Where do you want to stay today?"

      In bed, arms around a cute sexy guy, snuggling, because I can administer a Linux-running server on practically any internet-connected device which can take an input, and deliver an output.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    4. Re:Wanna know what I think? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      "You mean that microsoft apologists might actually admit that their products are more difficult to secure and remotely administer by design?"

      Apologist? Heh okay. Actually I was talking about the borderline fiction that flies around about Microsoft on Slashdot. "RTFA they all cried!"

      As for 'admitting that their products are difficult to secure', to be honest, I don't remember anybody denying that. Blown out of proportion? Sure. Whatever.

      "Or are you just tired of people pointing out that your chosen platform is far from perfect, or even good in many cases?"

      Compared to... Linux? Heh. Please. Nobody gets modded down for saying that Windows is a pain in the ass, but when you criticize Linux, man you better be as diplomatic as possible.

      "In bed, arms around a cute sexy guy, snuggling, because I can administer a Linux-running server on practically any internet-connected device which can take an input, and deliver an output."

      Yawn. You deal with servers, I deal with desktops. Actually even when I did deal with Microsoft servers, I found myself with a lot of time to play around on Slashdot. Pity not that many people have had that pleasant of experience. Oh well. Guess you gotta use the right tool for the right job, don'tcha? Glad you're happy. Pity you're so bitter that you feel the need to attack me over things I didn't say.

    5. Re:Wanna know what I think? by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Troll

      Man, where do these dumbfuck zealots come from? "Don't attack my Linux or I'll prove how happy I am with it by banging my fist on the desk!!!!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Wanna know what I think? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you struck a nerve, dude. Too bad ya got us both modded as troll.

    7. Re:Wanna know what I think? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think my point was proven. (Although I'd take that comment back if the guy who started the name calling was modded down as well.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  59. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ah give 'em a frickin' break. They had to build the story out of Lego first, which takes time, and then they turned out to be short a few bricks (which we already knew, didn't we?) and had to run out to the mall for more.

    The Han Solo story didn't take as long because someone else did all the work.

    KFG

  60. YOU ROCK! You guys have done something amazing! by Desmoden · · Score: 1


    To land TWO safely and are target. Hats off. More importantly you have once again made the world look up, which we need so much now that shuttle flights don't make new unless something horrible happens.

    And I must say, I tip my hat to your personally for being brave enough to post on /. =)

    It's not every day you get to write code and develope systems that make history.

  61. Al Gore would disagree... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... after all, he invented Space travel!

  62. Finally by DesertFalcon · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's about time they got a Mars rover to land right. I was starting to think NASA was playing Gunbound with those things.

    --
    --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Except that it's only the fifth that lands right...

      In fact, it's the first one that hasn't landed upright...

    2. Re:Finally by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

      so Spirit and Opportunity are like double death?

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
  63. Salvage Rights by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That brings up a question: Who has salvage rights to that stuff? I remember an old law of the sea where if you find an abandoned vessel you could salvage it, and mining claims are also that way in many countries. I know of the various Treaties that seem to prohibit ownership of extraterrestrial property, but does that include parts of landers and failed devices? When the Shuttle disintegrated and the parts fell on Texas, the U.S. Government prosecuted anyone who collected a part and did not turn it in. Of course, Texas is on Earth, in the U.S. The Moon, Mars, etc. is a whole nother country. Speaking of stuff crashing into planets, this is the anniversary of The COSMOS 954 Accident

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

    1. Re:Salvage Rights by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, taking parts of Columbia would be a) interfering with a gov't investigation and b) potentially very hazardous to your health... sounds like a decent reason to outlaw it.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:Salvage Rights by dabraun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's also a function of time. NASA didn't abandon the pieces of Columbia spread around the country ... they were actively seeking them.

      If we leave a lander on Mars for decades and eventually someone gets there and finds it ... at least by the current laws I think it's theirs.

      Of course the laws will probably change by then - once people start going into space governments will make laws concerning space. And I can see one of the first ones saying that 'all early spacecraft belong to the people who sent them' - and it might not be unreasonable given that retrieving them is impossible now so we have no choice but to abandon them.

      David

    3. Re:Salvage Rights by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Funny
      Who has salvage rights to that stuff?

      Whoever gets there first. If you can get to it, you can have it.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    4. Re:Salvage Rights by swb · · Score: 1

      Who has salvage rights to that stuff?

      It's an interesting legal/philosophical question, but the answer (not flippantly, either) is probably NASA only, due to its connections with the government and military. Even in international waters, military and space vehicle stuff isn't up for salvage, unless (A) you have better weapons than the US Navy and (B) you can grab it and get away with it before they do.

      In reality, it's salvagable by whoever gets their and can grab it without the military getting it first and without a whole shedload of US diplomatic pressure to give it back. Since we're talking Mars, and not some Pacific atoll or the bottom of the Atlantic ocean, I'd wager that the rights don't matter -- barring some major innovation, it's sitting there for a few decades at least.

    5. Re:Salvage Rights by rijrunner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The US government.

      Salvage rights do not apply to government owned vessels and equipment.

      A good case in point would be the CSA Hunley. Even though it's government no longer exists, all of the CSA's naval assets were transferred to the USA as part of it's surrender. So, when they went to salvage it, they had to get permission from the US government. Same applied to the CSA Alabama.

      In space, it is even more restriction as the Space Treaty automatically make the national government the owner of record for anything constracted by it's citizens or corporations. It has not been run through and courts yet, but it might get a little wierd as things start picking up.

    6. Re:Salvage Rights by mriker · · Score: 1
      potentially very hazardous to your health... sounds like a decent reason to outlaw it.

      Yes, because the government having complete control over what we do with our own bodies is a very good thing.

    7. Re:Salvage Rights by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Even if anyone could salvage them, they shouldn't! Personally I would love to see these landers left alone as historic monuments. Same for those on other worlds like the Moon and Venus. (Tho I can't see many people messing around with anything on the surface of Venus :-)

      Depends on who gets there first I guess. One can only hope!

    8. Re:Salvage Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your posts would be a lot easier to read if they weren't sprinkled with the contraction of "it is" wherever the word "its" is supposed to occur. You are probably now thinking Oh, brother, a spelling freak. Wrong. This is not a spelling issue. It's a matter of using the right word so that people can read your post. How is the reader supposed to make it through a sentence that starts "Even though it's government", which tells them they are about to read something like "property", and then continues with "no longer exists"? Now the reader must stop in the middle of this seeming gibberish, realize that you meant to use "its" instead of "it's", and then start the sentence over again, substituting "its" for "it's". If you have trouble remembering how to spell "its", just remember that it's like "his" and "hers".

    9. Re:Salvage Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also remember that only one form of it(')s has an apostrophe - and then remmeber that contractions ALWAYS have an apostrophe. Therefore, the possesive (its) does not have an apostrophe.

    10. Re:Salvage Rights by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Insightful
      > In space, it is even more restriction as the Space Treaty automatically make the national government the owner of record for anything constracted by it's citizens or corporations. It has not been run through and courts yet, but it might get a little wierd as things start picking up.

      Let me get this straight. Suppose I won the dot-com lottery and built my own frickin' rocket with my own frickin' money, flew it to Mars, set up my own habitat, and enjoyed the sights.

      Now, my launch may have broken any number of FAA regulations, and my government's free to fine me for it (or they can come the fuck over here to Mars and arrest me! :)

      But you're tellin' me that this treaty says my government also owns my Martian base, even though I built it with my own money?

      This treaty needs to be abolished immediately, if not sooner. 100% taxation of extraterrestrial assets is not how you pave the way for commercial development of space.

      It won't "get a little weird as things start picking up", because with a treaty like that, there's no way in hell anyone will ever start a private space venture. There'll be no space Hilton, because Hilton already gives enough cash to the government in the form of taxes every year.

    11. Re:Salvage Rights by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Or the US military will destroy it before you can effectively salvage it; like the components of the F117 stealth fighter/bomber that was shot down by the Serbs.

      Not long after that, the Chinese embassy was 'accidentally' bombed.

      I can't blame the Chinese for wanting some fragments of that plane...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:Salvage Rights by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      That brings up a question: Who has salvage rights to that stuff? I remember an old law of the sea where if you find an abandoned vessel you could salvage it

      That's true with privately owned vessels (if I'm not mistaken) but definitely not true of warships. Sunk/destroyed warships belong to the nation that built them. This has been mentioned numerous times on History Channel/National Geographic when they have explored wrecks from WW2. Even if the nation was defeated (Germany/Japan) the wrecks still belong to them -- unless they were transferred as part of the surrender agreement (as a previous poster pointed out with the case of the CSA Hunley and Alabama).

      I'm 90% sure that privately owned vessels are completely up for grabs though. Witness some of the expeditions that brought back plates/other artifacts from the Titanic. Personally I find that repulsive (most sunken ships are grave sites) but by the letter of the law they didn't do anything wrong.

      It's debatable how you would qualify these landers. I'd tend to think that they would be protected under the warship clause (being launched by Governments -- not private individuals or corporations) -- I definitely don't see any Government allowing private citizens to take them (should we ever make it to Mars) -- but as far another Government trying to do it it would probably be a good old fashion case of "If you don't like it, then try and stop us". Of course all this assumes there would be any reason (other then history/nostalgia) to salvage these things in the first place. Might be nice to see them in the Smithsonian one day but I doubt they will have any other value then that after sitting on Mars for a couple of decades.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:Salvage Rights by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      If you want to legalize it I'll sell you a lot of land on Mars so they can't take it.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    14. Re:Salvage Rights by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Go ahead, pick up the carcinogen based materials the shuttle is made with... or the fuel that will burn your hands instantly. Feel free. Perhaps is will kill off some the the knee-jerk paranoid instinct :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    15. Re:Salvage Rights by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      I also think that they'd come under some buoy clause (structure not designed to be manned). After all they were never MANNED, so you could say that they were never abandoned. They're remote sensors, thus, only the owner can 'salvage' them.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  64. Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opportuni by robot+captain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been looking at a lot of old Viking info, but unfortunately there isn't as much easily available information about the details of the landing as there are about Spirit and Opportunity. Were the viking missions any easier to conduct? And why/how was the landing so different? Why wasn't that type of landing (reminiscent of apollo moon landings, it seemed) used for the rover missions? It just seems so radically different. Here we have an airbagged package slamming into mars at up to 40G's (well, 2-3G's this time) and yet the viking was a landing craft which I can't imagine being able to take a fraction of that force.

  65. OT: Your Sig by Jaysyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas"

    The Monorail at Disneyworld, right?

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:OT: Your Sig by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am a part-time driver there. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  66. Simultaneity is not absolute by Solandri · · Score: 2, Insightful
    One of the consequences of relativity is that simultaneity is also relative. Events at different locations which may be simultaneous in one reference frame can happen at different times in another. So saying things happened 10 minutes earlier isn't really accurate either. It happened 10 minutes earlier in Earth's reference frame, but there's a moving reference frame where it happened 5 minutes earlier, another where it happened 15 minutes earlier. (It always happened earlier in all reference frames though, else cause and effect are violated.)

    True, you have to be moving pretty fast to get discrepancies of this magnitude in simultaneity. But correcting a misconception by replacing it with another misconception in the name of education isn't really productive IMHO.

    1. Re:Simultaneity is not absolute by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I'm not sure it's proper to say that cause and effect would be violated. They would exchange places creating an "antiphysics," the most critical part of which would be the Anti-Second Law of Thermodynamics.

      However, what that would do is violate the Priciple of Covariance. The laws of physics would be variable with one's frame of reference.

      Since it was the Principle of Covariance that led inevitably to the Theory of Relativity (or the Theory of Invariants, as Einstein prefered); and since the Theory of Relativity has withstood considerable test, one may reasonably assume that the covariance hypothesis has also withstood test.

      I'm afraid I've always considered superluminal phenomenoa being treated as a mere issue of cause and effect to be a bit of a dumbing down of the subject. :)

      KFG

  67. Re:Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well viking didnt have complex rovers. And it was controlled from earth.. whereas the rovers are automated.. theres more reasons but im tired and confused about where i am

    did i mention im drunk?

    bye

  68. Reassignment of JenniCam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news, Jenni from the online voyeur site, JenniCam has folded operations in California and moved her equipment to Mars. She will provide 24.6597 hour coverage of the rovers as they sleep, pick up rocks and even shower themselves off.
    As the two rovers are the only known inhabitants, unlike Jenni they will not hook up with a fat goateed white boy.

    1. Re:Reassignment of JenniCam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      JenniCam has folded operations in California and moved her equipment to Mars
      Um, Jenni's equipment was well on its way toward Mars already, if you catch my drift. Why do you think JenniCam shut down in the first place?
  69. Re:So, this makes what? by minesweeper · · Score: 3, Informative
    Take a look at the Chronology of Mars Exploration.

    Every country that has sent orbiters/landers/rovers to Mars has had a high number of failures, including the Soviet Union (later Russia), the United States, Japan, and Europe.

    Take a look at this quality Wikipedia article on Mars exploration.

  70. CODE BROWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mars defense is on code BROWN - another earthling contraption has landed

  71. awesome by hellmarch · · Score: 1

    this is awesome. one rover kicked ass now there are two. good work NASA and JPL and anyone else who helped out. i hope i can work on something as cool as this mission when i get older. i wish more people paid attention to these missions. most people i know just say, "they sent a cart to mars. wow. who cares?" i hope people aren't this disinterested when we finally send a mission to Europa.

  72. Is it just me... by holizz · · Score: 1

    Or do various space agencies in Europe and the US have an infinate number of Mars probes at the moment? Seriously, everytime I switch the news//. on I hear about a new damn probe. When the hell are they going to run out?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      hehe I was wondering the same thing. And why all at the same time period? Maybe they're in there looking for Saddam's WMD's :)

    2. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides that, the best launch opportunities in general are about 3 years apart. So every 3 years, a new set of probes arrive all at once, relatively speaking. I do not know what missions are coming up for the next close pass in 3 years, but you can be sure they are in the planning stages right now.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its every two years that earth and mars get so close. And its going to be this close again around 2287, about the same time I'll finally be getting laid... I think/hope...

    4. Re:Is it just me... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      No, the number of probes is not infinate. However rocket scientist have known for years that for a short time (months? I'm not a rocket scientist) about now would be a perfect oppertunity to land on Mars. So they all worked really hard to make sure that their mars missions were ready to arrive now.

      Because of the alignment of the planets (no really), it is a lot cheaper for something to arrive at mars now, then last year or next year.

  73. Re:Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viking rovers made a rocket powered descent, which is inherently a more expensive design. I saw a NASA program which claimed this was done partly due to NASA budget's being much higher in the 70's, but the 1970 budget was $4b and last years was $15b, so I'm not sure if that is true...

  74. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Glad we could help!

    If you thought that was impressive, stay tuned - we've got a few surprises in store for you. Do the words "Martian oil refinery" mean anything to you? (You didn't think Bush got excited about Mars for science's sake did you?)

    We'll say this - pay attention to what the photos don't show you.

  75. Re:Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Combined budget for the Viking missions was over $1.3b in 1970 dollars. Compare that to $800m in 2003 dollars for Mars Express...

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. Arnie having a total recall? by metal_priest · · Score: 1

    This is bad news. Arnie shouldn't have been allowed into the NASA press conference. He's a martian spy!

  78. explanation of parent joke by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think this is a reference to the movie Total Recall. Which is based on a Philip K. Dick short story, BTW :) (that's a little slashdot interest for yous ;).

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  79. "Fault Tones"? by DrCode · · Score: 1

    My first thought was of R2D2 giving out one of his high squeeling sounds when he was upset about something.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by questamor · · Score: 2, Informative

    As of 4:17pm EST, pictures are rolling in from Opportunity. It's opened and sending pictures back already. The magnetite ground "looks like a tiled patio" and is more ordered and flat than that of Spirit's landing site

    Nasa TV has the RM stream:
    http://realserver1.jpl.nasa.gov:8080/ramg en/encode r/live.rm

  82. Re: *before the* First Step in Terraforming: by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Air? Wonderful. Now all you need is some way of kick starting Mars' core, to produce a stronger (and complete) magnetic field.
    Otherwise you'd have to keep shipping air to Mars as it gets blown away by solar wind. Might get kinda expensive. Maybe you can work something out with UPS though, I hear they have good deals for long-term customers. ;)

  83. spaceflight pictures? by BTWR · · Score: 1

    anyone else not seeing spaceflightnow pictures (just text?)

  84. One question about their mission control tech: by MMHere · · Score: 1, Interesting

    First, congrats for landing Opportunity.

    Why don't they automate the mission control tech a bit more, rather than using:

    (a) voice intercom (radio style) communication, where the mission commanders "poll" the heads of all the various departments, awaiting voice response before moving on? Human response is *so* slow w.r.t. real time events affecting the space craft.

    (b) printed procedure books? Just prior to awaiting the 1st images (after petal opening) I heard the mission command say "we're at page 12 and beyond in The Procedure..." If pagination is necessary, this implies printed procedural docs.

    Why not do this interaction "online?"

    (a) voice comm may still be useful, but why not use IM for a group of people to "chat." Is the voice feed for the media?

    (b) why not "follow the procedure" with some online, multi-user app that checks off the steps done on some browser sort of app? The engineering specs have to be changing up to the last minute; why commit to paper something that becomes obsolete once you press Print?

    I know they're displaying the received images live on an X station (on a cool big screen). So clearly they are taking advantage of recent technology.

    Just, PLEASE, why the voice comm and printed procedures?

    Thanks for listening. Good luck, Opportunity and team.

    1. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 4, Informative

      Disclaimer: I work at JPL, but not on the Mars rovers...

      Why don't they automate the mission control tech a bit more...

      General observation about JPL and NASA: they're slow to adopt new technology. This is a good thing. They tend to wait until a particular technology is very mature and clearly useful before adopting it in a mission-critical environment. Individual scientists and engineers are welcome to experiment with all sorts of cutting-edge tools for number crunching, visualization, simulations, etc. - and they do - but mission-critical technology is kept deliberately as simple as possible.

      (a) voice comm may still be useful, but why not use IM for a group of people to "chat." Is the voice feed for the media?

      Honestly I think that voice communication is far more efficient - most people can talk faster than they can type, and when you know the other person you gain more information from their tone of voice, etc.

      (b) why not "follow the procedure" with some online, multi-user app that checks off the steps done on some browser sort of app? The engineering specs have to be changing up to the last minute; why commit to paper something that becomes obsolete once you press Print?

      I can think of many reasons:

      1. KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid): If you relied on software to make sure you were following the procedures, that software now becomes mission-critical. The software has to be totally foolproof. It takes about 10x as much effort to write robust, clean, documented, verified code as it does to toss off a quick web app.

      2. An online form or "procedure wizard" couldn't possibly be smart enough to anticipate any possible deviation from the rules that might be necessary.

      3. With rules printed on paper, you can spread them all out in front of you. You can circle things with a pencil. You can make corrections or notes.

      4. You don't have to waste valuable computer screen real-estate. Even though many of the mission people have 2 or 3 monitors, they want every last pixel displaying interactive real-time information, not opened to a web browser displaying a list of rules.

    2. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by RealUlli · · Score: 2
      Why not do this interaction "online?"

      (a) voice comm may still be useful, but why not use IM for a group of people to "chat." Is the voice feed for the media?

      Because IM is even slower than voice comms. Remeber why people want headsets to communicate during multiplayer egoshooters?

      (b) why not "follow the procedure" with some online, multi-user app that checks off the steps done on some browser sort of app? The engineering specs have to be changing up to the last minute; why commit to paper something that becomes obsolete once you press Print?

      Because nothing changes at the last minute. Also, paper is more failproof than a computer app.

      I have to admit, this approach does actually have some merit, but not because of the reasons you mentioned here, but rather because it cuts down on the voice communication needs.

      BTW - pagination doesn't necessarily imply printed docs, they might be using an app that doesn't use scrolling. Not scrolling might be actually a good thing, because all you need at this moment is there, easily visible, without having to navigate - cuts down on possible error sources...

      Cheers, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    3. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, having worked at NASA for a few years in the mid-1990's, I can say that they do in fact use computers to manage some of the information. If I remember correctly, at the time I worked there, they were putting some of their reference materials (drawings of various parts, etc.) on computer. The reason being that the reference materials cover every part of the craft in excruciating detail, so computers provide a real advantage here: with paper, you have mounds and mounds of dead tree, and it's hard to find stuff.

      However, putting some stuff on computer doesn't make sense. Paper is just more reliable than computers. For real-time, mission critical stuff, you probably want it on paper because you simply can't afford to deviate from the procedure because someone's computer crashed. Certain things have to be done at certain times for the mission to succeed. (Or so I've heard -- my work at NASA did not ever entail visiting mission control for anything.)

      And to answer the question about printed documents becoming obsolete, well actually it shouldn't be much of a problem. They launch that thing into space and then it takes a while to get to Mars. Opportunity landed today (January 24th), but it was launched July 7th, giving them six months to print out stuff and make sure the paper was in order. Since they are not changing the construction of the craft while it's in transit, it's safe to say it should be easy to make sure the engineering specs are up-to-date.

    4. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by leeward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having worked on three missions in the past (though not any Mars missions), here are some random thoughts. The communications done via voice are fairly routine (unless something has gone wrong). The polling is always arranged to happen during a quiet spot, so there is plenty of time to get it done, and clear procedures if someone has the audacity to say "no go" ;)

      Since it is routine, you can casually half listen to the comm, waiting for your call sign, and in the mean time concentrate on doing "real work" uninterrupted. Having to sit there constantly reading IM messages, waiting for yours, would in my opinion be a serious distraction. And as others have mentioned, most people can talk far faster than they can type.

      Printed procedures? An easy to keep, and easy to access archival log. Easy to mark up, and for the artistically inclined, frequently acquire lots of extra decoration. I will admit that at times during a mission, I felt like I was drowning in paper. Certainly some of it could be done online. But I suspect that I am like a lot of people, and like to print out long documents to read them, rather than reading them on a computer screen.

    5. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. With rules printed on paper, you can spread them all out in front of you. You can circle things with a pencil. You can make corrections or notes.

      Remember folks, paper may not have much computational power, but it still has a far more versatile interface than any computer does.

    6. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by tmortn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The voice comm system works great. You have to understand this is not like using a phone at home. Every position in that room has an open loop ( open party line basically ). Same for the various "back room" teams. The TV feed I think is a combination of a commentator loop and the flight loop. There are probably dozens more and like I said they are all open party lines. There is a whole protocol behind how loop traffic is managed, for one its highly likely not all positions have talk capacity on the flight loop.

      It helps somewhat if you understand the organization scheme. Flight is the peak of the pyramid under which you have the front room operators. The back room teams are generally related more or less to a front room position. Thus flight recieves reports from the front room and a few select remotes, the front room positions talk amongst themselves and recieve reports and have discussions with various back room teams. As the information under discussion gets finalized and or needs command decisions from flight they then bring it to the flight loop. Thus for most every status report you hear on the TV there has been a great deal of discussion going on you didn't hear on the various other loops.

      You are not limited to monitoring one loop at a time... you can punch up several and the importance of various traffic then dictates what you pay attention too. Off hand I think the TV feed is made up of a commentator loop and the flight loop. Each of those people in the front room likely has numerous loops punched up and is listening to a chacaphony of traffic that most people would find all but impossible to follow. Its deffiantly an aquired skill.

      The closest expereince I can ascociate to monitoring voice loops in a NASA flight ops environment is like IRC where you are simultaneously monitoring and occasionally addind to the traffic in multiple rooms.

      Sometimes it would be nice if voice loops had the same easy access to the discussion history as online chat but by and by voice works much better than chat rooms could ever manage. However I grant one day I think you will see chat lines creeping into the process. Alot of loop traffic invovles long nuemonics, settings, serial numbers etc... and voice communication can often break down at that point and you wind up resorting to alpha Beta charlie lingo for clarity and multiple reads and read backs.

      As for procedures the reason they are printed instead of on screen is due to the same issue that faces E-books. On screen procedures are not very friendly. Secondly screen real estate is at a premium.. if I want to look at multiple pages of a printed procedure its a matter of desk/floor/wall space. If I want to on a monitor I am limited to my screen real estate which is far less and far more expensive to add additional space.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    7. Re:One question about their mission control tech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remeber why people want headsets to communicate during multiplayer egoshooters?

      Because their hands (and keyboards) are already engaged in playing the game.

      Nothing to do with typing speed.

  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Pictures coming in from Opportunity by questamor · · Score: 1

    As of 4:17pm EST, pictures are rolling in from Opportunity.

    Oops. 4:17am even.

  87. Pictures just came through by Teahouse · · Score: 2, Informative

    Was watching the NASA TV coverage, and they got imaging at 1:24 AM PST. WOW! There is a rock outcrop about 30 meters away that had the geologist say he "Was speechless". The outcrop looks like an actual hematite outcrop! If this is true, this lander is in the perfect place even though it landed a little long in it's ellipse. Every image they got looked completely strange. It didn't look anything like the Gusev images (which look a lot like Viking and Sojoner's). I think this will be the most interesting landing site from the look of it. The images will probably be available at the JPL site within an hour. Go check them out.

    --
    "Curiosity killed the cat, but for a while I was a suspect."- Steven Wright
  88. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  89. Looks like they may have landed in a mudhole... by TribeDoktor · · Score: 0

    The next mars mission will include a 4 wheeler with a video camera strapped to the gunrack..

    Faster, cheaper, smaller! = NASA

  90. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  91. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the early pictures, gotta love predictable filenames, seems they like to put stuff up and let it sit around for a while, guess PR has to clear it before they publish the link:P

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/oppor tu nity.html

  92. Re:Petals by Dieppe · · Score: 1

    Sometimes when ya roll a d4 you get a 4... and sometimes ya get a 1... They were just unlucky this time, but that's okay because as you said it'll right itself by unfolding!

  93. Pics!! by lisany · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pics at http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportu nity.html

  94. A few Spirit links about flight software by Deton8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I found a few flight software links about the two Mars craft... it's normal that little of this information is put on the web due to ITAR regulations...

    PDF of a powerpoint about static analysis of the code

    First and second links from GCN magazine.

    And here is a chatty JPL page showing the key team members and their personal reflections

    Some technical briefs on the science payload can be downloaded here or here

    A list of Cornell's scientists and their bios etc is here

    Here is an article about another software guy.

    A cool technical power point about the computers, only available on google cache, is here

    And lastly, a technical comparison of today's rovers against something called Fido.

    I simply don't know what I did before Google!

    1. Re:A few Spirit links about flight software by oogoody · · Score: 1

      I am not saying they shouldn't do static
      analysis, but i'm betting on vxworks most
      of the bugs will be in the dynamic behaviours.

  95. All 77 raw images from Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportunity .html

    Looks like some interesting outcroppings nearby.

    Will the 5 degree tilt nose up cause any major egress problems? I noticed that one egress point had the air bags completely retracted. Looks great!

    I can't believe the difference in landing sites!

    Great job once again!

    Cheers!

    1. Re:All 77 raw images from Opportunity by dnixon112 · · Score: 1

      It really is quite amazing how much diversity there is on a planet that is usually considered barren and lifeless. Although the viking, pathfinder and spirit rover landing areas all had some similar features, this landing spot seems very different. Very exciting stuff.

  96. Opportunity Pictures by Bluskale · · Score: 3, Informative

    77 pictures from Opportunity are now available for viewing.

    1. Re:Opportunity Pictures by floamy · · Score: 1

      Looks a whole lot different that the Spirit landing site. Notably The ground and this thing off in the distance.

  97. Re:Go USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to forget that the "Eurotrash" did give birth to one of the most brilliant scientists of all time. Let me refresh your memory: Riemann, Bohr, Einstein, Minskowski, Cauchy, Hilbert, Planck, Poincare, Lie, Cartan, Lorentz, Lagrange, Ampere, Maxwell, Hamilton, Curie, Nernst and so forth.

    So everything "we" do nowadays, the Yanks included, is nothing more than the confirmation of what these giants have done. I do congratulate you with those Rovers, but realise where our fundamental knowledge comes from. All our space engineering efforts, those of Russia, US, Europe and Asia are really not that great, except for the insane price tags.

    It has never been a bad personal quality to show some humble attitude, especially if one cannot claim to possess a great scientific history such as that of Europe.

    Yours Truly,
    Eurotrash.

  98. Mars Exploration Project Soundtrack by Elusive_Cure · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If anyone is interested in art in combination with science should go and buy the DVD version of "Mythodea" By Vangelis (Papathanasiou), the world known Greek composer/performer/musician. The Dvd is filmed Live in Athens (Greece), at the temple of Zeus in the heart of athens, a July mooned night. The whole theme "Mythodea" is composed as a theme to the Mars Exploration Held by NASA and the concert is a-b-s-0-l-u-t-e-l-y B-R-I-L-L-I-A-N-T-!-!-!-! I strongly recommend this as an nour and a half of pure entertainment, especially when seeing live or at least enjoy on a home cinema set up.

    --
    Roses are red, violets are blue, most poems rhyme, but this one doesn't... ;^)
  99. congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well done landing them both! At least two out of three of mankinds Mars landers made it. I'm very excited :)

  100. Images and Excitement by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow, what can I say? I'm in building 264 here at JPL and it's way past our bed time, but that's not stopping everyone from enjoying the new images! The enthusiasm here is just incredible; I've never been so on the edge of my seat as I was as I waited for my script to automatically bring up the first image processed from Mars.

    Steve Squyres (the principle investigator) is quite excited about the position of the rover... It's insane how many geologically interesting features are nearby the rover, especially considering it was a safe landing site. To quote the press conference, "It's like trying to land in Oklahoma and hope to find the Grand Canyon." It's simply amazing the details we are seeing on even the most compressed of images!

    Geologists are excited, engineers are excited... Even people that don't know anything about geology (like myself) realize how important it is to find outcroppings like this... allowing us to see the stratigraphy of the local site... looking back millions of years into the past, it's incredible! I personally hope that we RAT the outcroppings. We're already seeing some hints of layering there... hmm...

    But most exciting of all is the chance, as Steve Squyres mentioned, that we could be inside a crater. That would be an incredibly awesome place to start... The chance to study craters up close will be invaluable to our future interpretation of cratered worlds.

    Once again I cannot get accross how cool all of this is. Thanks so much to all of you out there who are interested in this stuff... even if it is just which OS the rover runs :)

    Cheers,
    Justin Wick
    Science Activity Planner Developer
    Mars Exploration Rovers

    1. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I'll bet you're the Prime Minister of Sweden, mister anonymous poster.

    2. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at his homepage, you moron

    3. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the homepage with posts dating from 2001 and state that he was a sophmore at that time?

      You dumb fucking bitch.

    4. Re:Images and Excitement by QuantumFTL · · Score: 5, Informative

      before anyone gets excited because of "Justin Wick"'s signature, realize he is not really a NASA scientist but a little intern guy.

      The above poster is correct. I state clearly in my Slashdot info that I am a university student. I have been working on MER since I was a freshman, and I have spent the last 3 years developing portions of the GDS software used by the scientists. (GDS = Ground Data Systems). I am one semester away from my degree in Applied Physics.

      Yes, I am an intern, however I have been doing this long enough as to actually have some idea of what I am doing. When I post in a semioffical capacity, I try to stay within my realm of expertise, or synthesize information that was stated previously by someone who knows what they are talking about.

      I'm merely trying to provide some "insider" views to slashdot. The big guys on the mission tend to have a few better things to do than post to slashdot, so I do :)

      Cheers,
      Justin

    5. Re:Images and Excitement by Jayfar · · Score: 3, Funny

      before anyone gets excited because of "Justin Wick"'s signature, realize he is not really a NASA scientist but a little intern guy.

      I would say Justin is an intern who has been doing some pretty damned impressive work that he should rightly be quite proud of. I don't see anything particularly self-agrandizing in his many informative posts here.

      So what is it you do at McDonalds, Mr. Anonymous Coward? Sweep the parking lot and clean the restrooms?
    6. Re:Images and Excitement by kjhambrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm ...

      Download Maestro and the Maestro-UserGuide.pdf.

      Justin might be an intern but his name is on
      the title page of the Maestro User's Guide
      among the five authors (P.G Bakes, J.S. Norris,
      M.W. Powell, M.A. Vonta and J.V.Wick).

      Great work Justin !

      Thank you and NASA for the work !

      -- kjh

    7. Re:Images and Excitement by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a crappy thing to say. Before anyone gets excited the above poster is a troll and an anonymous coward who probably wishes he had (or will have) education a tenth as cool as that.

    8. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah yeah yeah we KNOW you're at effin' JPL, and we know you wrote some code. Please try some humility. Here's how you might have started your post:

      Wow, what can I say? I'm lucky enough to be here at JPL and it's way past everyone's bed time, but that's not stopping us from enjoying the new images! The enthusiasm here is just incredible; I've never been so on the edge of my seat as I was as I waited to see the first image processed from Mars.

      Try it. You'll be amazed at how well it works to be humble. People will follow up with enthusiastic questions, rather than think you're some small fry oddball that the rest of JPL makes fun of.

    9. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out or you may get fired you moron..."semi official", what the fuck is that?

      Get back to work and get that fucking 10-lines shell script going...

    10. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your wife brings your kids in for a Happy Meal, I give her a Happy Time.

    11. Re:Images and Excitement by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
      Yeah yeah yeah we KNOW you're at effin' JPL, and we know you wrote some code. Please try some humility

      Oh come on now: don't be jealous just because some people are living a dream that most of us have had at some point. Personally, I think the people at JPL have a LOT to be proud of and even have a right to boast a little. They are fast becoming the new Columbus'

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    12. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators this is not Justin Wick, this is an imposter. Read all his previous postsings. The real Justin Wick is on #maestro on freenode.

      Later.

      Z

    13. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahha..

      Suck my fat cock asshole. You must have some big ego retard intern.

    14. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha troll you are just a kid

    15. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh come on now: don't be jealous

      Jealousy had nothing to do with it. Just tryin' to pass on a tip to you youngsters: Be humble. The benefits are many. Let others discover your talents and they will sing your praises; beat people over the head with them and they will mock you.

    16. Re:Images and Excitement by rogerdr · · Score: 1

      Better and better! Today's download showing the descent photos from MER-B show that at least it landed 'close' to a large crater and that this may in fact be the origin of the bedrock outcropping now seen in greater detail.

    17. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey i saw a cute brunette chick on tv for the landing coverage, she was wearing a white button-up shirt with vertical colored stripes. is she an intern too?

    18. Re:Images and Excitement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucktard, what kind of expertise may you have that is worth having?

      Moron...barely a degree and you talk like you have 10 PhDs and 10 years of experience.

      Go and clean the toilet now!

    19. Re:Images and Excitement by Cujo · · Score: 1

      And your views are read and appreciated. some of the best people I've ever worked with were quite young - the energy and fresh outlook brought to the work can easily outweigh experience in many cases.

      And let's not feed the trolls.

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

  101. Re:Go USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, don't feed the trolls. Nobody really thinks that crap the trolls spew. It saddens me to see Europeans getting all upset and running around talking about those awful American slashbots. They aren't for real, just trollin' - there are people in America who do believe such crazy nonsense, but they are a small fraction of the population, redneck idiots from the depths of Georgia. Please, collectively all you Europeans, stop mistaking that crap for some sort of "American" point of view and biting on their trolling. It just makes you look foolish and degrades the entire Slashdot community.

  102. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by mlyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    For more good stuff, go to my site...

    Featuring COLOR IMAGES from Opportunity, before JPL has made them available. (By aggregating 2/5/6 filters together to simulate what the human eye would see).

    Also, there are stereo anaglyphs up of the lander.

  103. Re:Go USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot Nikola Tesla....One of the MOST important guys.

  104. Re:Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opport by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Actually, the bigger reason for doing that was testing. We had done others in a Rocket Powered Descent (ah apollo anyone?) and knew that it worked. Had the ballistics down and the programming for it.

    The idea of simply bouncing and then rolling around had not occured to anyone. To be honest, I doubt that we had the material back then for doing it.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  105. well thats strange :/ by POds · · Score: 1

    more success for NASA... Did i miss the slashdot posting about hell freezing over?

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  106. Re:Go USA! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Relax. Far too many idiots around. People are electing to show off their politics by attacking others.

    Besides, you missed one of the greats today; Stephen Hawkings.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  107. alien in one picture! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    you can see an alien in one
    picture. i can't give you the link
    but it's in one pictures with the
    tile like stone formation.

    the alien is kindda like a sea-shell
    typ animal. it's coiled up at
    the base of the tile rock formation ... ...
    great job jpl.nasa!

    1. Re:alien in one picture! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here's the link. no tampering
      but for adding the blue arrow ...

      emptyempty.tripod.com/alien.jpg

      if you know how to look at 3-d stereo
      pics just align the blue arrow to one.
      kinda like "looking thru the screen".

  108. OT by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

    But your last sentence is exactly why I hate American educational systems. "Let's dumb it down to the lowest common denominator" they say. Well, that's great for the dumb kids, but for anyone smarter who knows there is more going on, it's just something to un-learn then re-learn the real way.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    1. Re:OT by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      um almost everything you learn has to be unlearnt and relearnt the real way.

      Do you really think it would be useful to start with "2+2=4, using a number system definition where 2 = successor(successor(0)) and '+' is defined as the composition of two functions, and the answer is a representation of the answer by definition, using a base 10 number system. I will now setup the assumptions we need for this number system to follow basic composition rules."

    2. Re:OT by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      That's a bit extreme. Obviously, addition has many uses just by being a simple system. But things like pre-highschool science courses are what I'm talking about. I easily could have understood relativity if explained to me properly (like a book I got one christmas when I was in 6-7th grade did.) Electricity, as it was explained to me in 5th grade, didn't make a whole hell of a lot of sense. It was just a real pain in the ass, because I spent all that time learning a bunch of bullshit, when I could have been learning something more important.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  109. Bittorrent, please use it for RAW data, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please start using Bittorrent for the large raw data files so all of us out here can zoom in really well on some of this and maybe study some of the science data ourselves.
    Bittorrent will take all the load off your servers and put it on to everyone who wants the data, you just send it out basicly once and everyone else does the rest.
    Thanks.

  110. Re:You mean by spongman · · Score: 1

    true, but not particularly useful. they would have received no fault tones if the lander had crashed, or burned up in the atmosphere.

  111. Pics link NASA sol1 pics all raw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/opportu nity.html

  112. First Color Photo is up! by BTWR · · Score: 4, Informative

    First Color Photo is here!

    1. Re:First Color Photo is up! by Via_Patrino · · Score: 1

      You can get more images as soon as they're out here

  113. Those photos are fantastic... by kiwioddBall · · Score: 1

    Lots of photos of airbag imprints, but look at the photo of the tiled structure - intelligent life on mars enthusiasts are going to love that one! Looks a bit like the Giants causeway in Ireland (only less geometric!!)

  114. Interesting question by EachLennyAPenny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apropos competition. If you would send two rovers to mars, would you let them be controlled by two teams or by one and the same?

    Each versions has some pros and cons. Can we have a poll for that? :)

  115. I had the privilege by rk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    of watching the images returned by MER-B with a fairly prominent planetary geologist tonight, and what he had to say was "That ain't no [expletive deleted] lava flow."

    The next couple of weeks are going to be very interesting, folks. And who said the Meridiani site was going to be boring?

    Time to go to bed.

    1. Re:I had the privilege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...of watching the images returned by MER-B with a fairly prominent planetary geologist tonight, and what he had to say was "That ain't no [expletive deleted] lava flow.""

      Hell, yeah! It looks like outcrop of sedimentary rock -- and weathered in a way rather like the classic, jointed "slickrock" surfaces seen in places like Canyonlands or Arches national parks near Moab, Utah. If it is sedimentary, woohoo! This is going to be very interesting.

  116. al gore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a little known fact, but Al Gore invented the space program.

  117. Re:Viking missions easier than Spirit & Opport by ultrasound · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Rocket Assisted Decent motors used on the current landers are designed to bring the landers almost to a complete stop (ie ~zero vertical velocity) a few feet or 10s of feet above the surface. However there can be very strong winds on Mars. The landing site and time of the Viking lander was highly restricted to very flat, boring, featureless areas with low wind speeds to minimise the risk of sideways movement on landing leading to it getting smeared across the landscape.

    The addition of air bags means there is a much greater range of safe geography that can be explored because the final phase of the decent can safely occur even with large horizontal and vertical velocities at parachute release.

    Obviously even with this system it is prudent to avoid regions with lots of crevasses and cracks as it would be rather a shame if it bounced along the surface and ended up jammed in a crack and unable to open.

  118. Al Gore by Salsaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Naturally he was there, he did after all, invent spaceflight.

  119. Sol by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    I see they are starting at Sol 1, but would it not make sense to continue with the Spirit timeline?

  120. Re:Go USA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, I was replying to the troll, not to the open-minded well-educated American, which I believe represents the majority of Slashdot, still.

    Anyway, the Rovers are a great achievement, and there is no doubt in my mind that we'll see some stunning results from them in due time. I can't wait to see them rolling :)

  121. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see you have a few Marsdial images in there too. How come green/blue is so badly rendered both in these images and most of the ones offered by JPL?

    The blue foam that's wrapped around most cables on the lander appears bright pink in most colour images, like this one:

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spi ri t/20040121a/Lander_Pan_Sol16-A18R1_br2.jpg

    The only "proper" Marsdial I've seen that shows green and blue is this one:

    http://www.redrovergoestomars.com/marsdial/spiri t_ color_348deg_1503h_006sol.htm ...So it must be possible to get true colour images?

  122. Ambiguous meaning. by Flingles · · Score: 2, Funny

    After 10 minutes of bouncing and rolling, it has come to a rest and transmitted its signal. There are no fault tones, indicating that there were no errors during landing and rolling .

    Just replace the bold words with: "Genetic Information," and "you know what."

    --
    Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
  123. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by mlyle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Any that incorporate infrared will render it purple-y. The blue chip is very reflective in the infrared spectrum.. and with 2 for most of the red value, infrared is incorporated into it.

    That's why it's called pseudocolor, because the redpoint is off by 30-60nm depending on exposure. It doesn't mess things up much except for things that have a ton of infrared reflectivity. I also have "nearcolor" pics that take L2/3/4/5/6 filtered pictures together and combine them to be really close perceptually what people would see. But there have not been any qualifying sets of images downlinked from Opportunity yet, nor will there be many. (L3/L4 aren't so useful for science, so it's only things that they're really interested in that they take pictures with all filters---and that thus I can do it for).

    See nearcolor pics near the top of my site.

  124. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by BoldAC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sweet pictures! Thanks for posting.

    Couple of questions.

    First, how are you gaining access to these pictures? Are they being placed on a public server somewhere? If so, NASA really rocks for giving everybody near real-time access.

    Second, in these pictures does anybody have an idea of scale? For example... the following picture looks like a tissue sample I might see under a microscope.
    http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/color/128287399-6 .jpg

    Anyway, thanks for the pictures... they kick ass. You deserve double Karma points. :)

    AC

  125. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by mlyle · · Score: 3, Informative

    HEhe, thank you.

    They all come from the JPL raw pictures area. My scripts/code turn the raw pictures into color imagery and anaglyphs, and assist me in stitching images together into larger ones.

    When it comes to scale, the pancam images (which all the color images are derived from) have a 16.8x16.8 degree field of view. This is about the same as 140mm telephoto lens when used with a 35mm camera. As to the size across the frame, this varies with the camera distance. The closest the camera will be to the center of the frame is about 7 ft, making the picture maybe about 2-3 feet across? The pancam is largely designed to mimic what human vision would see, in resolution and in focal length.

    The microscopic imager takes pictures that are about 1.25" across when in focus. I may be able to produce crude color pictures with it because it has a dust cover that is colored orange, and sometimes they take pictures with it on... providing crude color information.

  126. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by BoldAC · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info. I have been bragging to my wife all morning about the stuff now "I know" about the Mars program. Kinda relationship karma whoring. :)

    Anyway, thanks! It's great to have an insider around.

    Of course, I am going to have to update my CPU to run Maestro comfortably... (crunch, crunch, crunch) but I've been looking for an excuse anyway.

  127. Link coding by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    What's the codec(s) are used by the rover comm links? Is it trellis codes? Concatenated with block codes? Are they using that K=14 Viterbi decoder I saw on another JPL page?

    I always figured space probes can glom on coding because the receive side on Earth doesn't have to do real time decoding. You can just capture it over the DSN and decode with computers at your leisure.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Link coding by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Computers on earth are so much more abundant and powerful than anything on mars that I doupt anything prevents decoding in realtime. (or at least as close to realtime as the radio link allows, which is likely the limit).

    2. Re:Link coding by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Well, the encoding computers don't have to be powerful as the encoders, especially in the case of a trellis code, are orders of magnitude simpler.

      I recently designed a constraint length 9 decoder. The encoder is eight flip-flops. The decoder fills a 2 million gate FPGA. JPL's K=14 encoder is just 14 flip flops where as their decoder was at least a large board of components if i recall correctly.

      It's a similar situation with block codes. The encoder does a few polynomial multiplications and send the data on its way. the decoder has to do root searches.

      That's what makes these codes great for space probes. 99% of the complexity of the codec remains back here on Earth.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  128. Blonde space probes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why they go all the way to Mars and send back pictures of themselves!

  129. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by danbeck · · Score: 1

    Someone please mod this -1 Troll. Somehow, these people find a way to work their Bush hatred into *any* story, no matter how irrelevant it is.

  130. NASA Lacks Luster by satanslackey · · Score: 1

    Of course I'm delighted that Opportunity landed successfully, but I'm dismayed at such comments by NASA personnel as "We done good!" and "I'm just blown away by this." Can't we get more dramatic and elegant quotes? Let's have NASA hire some unemployed writers to punch up their press releases, to read something like "One Rover to find them, and in the Martian dust bind them," or "With this landing our two civilizations will be changed forever, and not for the better." (See? These are terrible too, which is why we need real writers!)

  131. And just an hour ago... by computational+super · · Score: 2, Funny

    And just an hour ago, I got a call that my programming job has already been offatmosphered to Martian programmers willing to work for trinkets and shiny beads...

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  132. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Maestro team has released its second data set. One can download it here. There is a new option to go to Opportunity's landing site, but no other Opportunity data is available for Maestro yet.

  133. New Masetro Data Set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Maestro team has released its second data set. One can download it here. There is a new option to go to Opportunity's landing site, but no other Opportunity data is available for Maestro yet.

  134. Motives? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "California's governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Ex Vice-president Al Gore were in attendance at the event in the JPL facilities."

    Schwarzenegger has the excuse of it being his state, but why was Gore present? IIRC, he wasn't exactly in favor of space exploration in the 2000 campaign. Is there going to be an upcoming press release about "better ways" the money could have been spent?

  135. A ha! by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

    So we DO have rights to the spaceship at Area 51!!

  136. NASA Teaboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is that moron teaboy at NASA will speak on behalf of NASA and thanks the geeks at Slashdot for supporting the "existence of Mars" with their lips?

  137. What's with the Maestro License? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    Why is the Maestro license so restrictive? De-compiling, reverse engineering, yada yada, are all disallowed by the license. Since the taxpayers paid for it, why isn't the software completely open?

    1. Re:What's with the Maestro License? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Since I live in England, none of MY taxes paid for it, yet I have installed the software and enjoy looking through it.

      Why on earth would you want to reverse engineer it yourself, do YOU have a set of probes ready to send?

      Sometimes talking about Open source for the sake of it is irrelivent, I have gotten closer to Mars than I probably ever will in my lifetime, and this software helped me do it - Thank you JPL :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:What's with the Maestro License? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would you want to reverse engineer it yourself, do YOU have a set of probes ready to send?Because I'm curious about what information is being transferred back and forth across the net. What the heck do the null exception faults mean when there were 3 attempts to remotely execute local code? What ports does this app open and why? Minor questions of that ilk.

    3. Re:What's with the Maestro License? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God people always find crap to bitch about.

  138. game idea by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Who wants to play a game of "guess what Richard C. Hoagland's going to say about that photo"

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/1/n/0 01 /1N128285132EDN0000P1500R0M1.JPG

    For this photo, I'm guessing he'll say it's a giant fossilized skeleton.

  139. Thats a plaent you are talking about by bluGill · · Score: 1

    There is a car in my parents yard that they are not using. I give you permission to take any part you want from it. (The engine is sitting in the backseat and isn't worth fixing so I can give you permission) All you have to do is find it, someplace on earth, so it shouldn't be a big deal.

    Not very helpful is it? Earth is very large. Okay, so in most cases we know about where a particular rover is. So my parents live near [some town in the US]. Near meaning that you only have to search about 10 square miles to find it. No big deal, until you look at the location of the next car to salvage and realize it is in India, and the one after that in South Africa. Sure you can optimise the list anyway you want to, but there is still a lot of travel time. Unlike earth there is nothing inbetween (no oceans, but also no other refueling stations or repair shops)

    1. Re:Thats a plaent you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't be that hard. We are obviously looking for some white trash Linux fan, who lives with his mommy and daddy. We'd be looking for the trailer with a car out front, up on cinder blocks, hood up, engine out.

    2. Re:Thats a plaent you are talking about by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong, spirit's landing site is known to within half a metre: check it out yourself if you don't believe me.
      But even with this knowledge, current technologies don't have the landing precision to land near to the rover. Opportunity landed 24 km from the target spot, spirit 13km IIRC. Those are considered very precise landings. And if you would send a rover that could drive 24km say in a few weeks, why bother trying to fix a rover that will only be driving 100m/day (and I'm being optimistic here).
      I think it would be cheaper trying to cover the martian soil with lego bricks (if you get a large volume discount:)).

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    3. Re:Thats a plaent you are talking about by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Where is beagel though? How about any of the Vikings? Or any of the failed Russian landers from years past?

      I could get you within a meter of the car at my parents house (with a GPS). there are many shipwrecks that nobody can get you within 100 miles of. For that matter there are shipwrecks that we know where they are, but the wreckage was more than 100 miles from where the first parts of the wreck were discovered.

    4. Re:Thats a plaent you are talking about by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      I wasn't considering fixing an old device, instead using parts from it to repair or build something on the planet. I realise current technology is not helpful, but we will need something that can get down to the planet, and get around, better than what we have anyway. When we start mining local materials, be it hematite or water, stuff will get worn out or broken. I believe, and may be wrong, that it is cheaper and smarter to use parts that are already laying around rather than sending more stuff that may or may not have a good time getting to Mars and landing.

      Alaska Village invited to test cheap, clean nuclear power

    5. Re:Thats a plaent you are talking about by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      I realise your point: everything sent into space instantaniously becomes worth it's money in gold. But I think those resources are just too scarse on mars to make it worthwile. Something like it could maybe hypothetically be tried in earth orbit using multiple satellites tugging old material to a junk yard area (duct-taping them together? using a giant bag to put them in? it's not because the idea sounds crazy that it won't work). As more and more stuff becomes available, a great playground emerges for cheap ad-hoc engineering, not to mention you're making life a lot easyer for Norad. Also remember that the first television was built from junk yard materials.

      On the other hand, changing the orbits might just be too costly. Some of the debris might still have fuel inside, like hydrazine IIRC a very corrosive material. Also, a lot of satellites contain radioactive material, so caution is adviced. I can also imagine a lot of governments will become very uncomfortable knowing there is a company/state holding vast amounts of radio-isotopes in one place; basically you'll be able to start your own star-wars program. But if your intentions are good, these isotopes could be used to power your junk yard house robots, together with the solar panels you'll recover in large quantities.

      On a side-note: I think it is this desctructive side of mankind that is holding back other space mining efforts too. Imagine you are able to capture comets and asteroids. This could be used to provide tons of water cheaply to the ISS and moon colonies. But you will also have the potential of dropping an asteroid on a specific city, wiping it of the earth without the fallout of a nuclear weapon.

      As long as we must carry the burden of having to be suspicious that others are willing to exterminate us, hope of any serious space projects remaine very low IMHO, because with a bad intention, the vast energies you're trying to control can be used as monstruous weapons. And mankind IS able of using monstruous weapons, in fact it has a rich history in doing so. Mankind must lose it's murdering instinct first or eventually we will all die. (Rationale: if we remain here on earth, a mass extingtion event will wipe us all out of existance).
      End side-note.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  140. WOO YAY HOO by dnahelix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hoo yay woo

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  141. New show on TLC in 2030 by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    "Junkyard Wars Extreme"

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  142. Pay no attention to this loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Congrats. This guy should go back to doing what he does best. Namely, fucking himself in the ass with a big rubber dick.

  143. It's in a crater!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool -- new panorama is available. The outcrops of bedrock look awesome, but I was confused by the way it looked like the impressions from the airbags were coming from two different directions almost 180 degrees from each other. Huh?

    Look carefully at the trail of round airbag impressions, and you can see how Opportunity must have rolled in from one side, down the hill, across the bottom of the valley, and up the other side of the hill a bit, before rolling back and finally coming to rest -- kind of like a marble dropped into a bowl. It looks like it landed in a crater, of which there are several in the landing ellipse.

    The telemetry from the bounces is going to look rather weird.

  144. ROFLMFAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there seriously needs to be a way to get even higher than +5... this comment deserves like a +230948732432

  145. small holes on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok. has anyone noticed the small holes on the ground where the airbags retracted ? It's like, many of them, some are dark black, like they are hollow, some look like they have been filled by dust, or their walls collapsed filling them. Don't remember seing this on spirit's, wonder what that is.

    1. Re:small holes on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... so you can find it: look at this color image, make sure it shows 100% size and scroll down ... right by the solar panels, lots of small dark holes .. scrolling up you can see the holes filled ...

  146. bah by TitanOfire · · Score: 1

    you know whats gonna happen dont you? Theyre gonna take a bunch of pictures and say "hooray look what we can do!" and then as theyre puting the pictures on postcards and crap the half billion dollar robot is gonna brake. Thats when we send up the hyper intelligent monkeys. we dont need those back. send em up with advanced mechanic textbooks and theyll fix em up. its all good.

  147. Re:Was this posted from Mars..? by Lairdsville · · Score: 1

    Great site, keep up the good work!

  148. Spirit software is not fully tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From space.com
    "Spirit does not have a huge track record of testing, a source said, for fear of damaging the robot and not meeting an unforgiving launch window. "

    Uh - sending a 400 million dollars robot and they didnt test the software? Gee, didnt they hire any software QA engineers to test the damn thing or do they have a bunch of software engineers with the mentality of "my code works perfectly - it must be hardware problem!!"?

  149. For us old-timers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm 44, and I was 9 years old when we landed on the moon.

    Imagine how that felt.

    Scratch that. You can't begin to imagine. The world stayed still...very still... for about6 days. There's nothing else to compare it to in my lifetime; I suspect very little else has happened that you could compare it to.

    knowing how crude the technology is as a middle-aged geezer, those guys were *beyond* balls. Computers that were less powerful than an Apple ][ no redundancy, nothing. A zillion parts and it all had to work right the first time.

    That's why we have to go into space. This landing has me thrilled. Imagine what its like if you're 9 years old. Imagine what it will be like when we go to the moon again.

    Imagine (maybe in my lifetime) what it will be like when we land on Mars.

    I can't imagine.

    1. Re:For us old-timers by _Sexy_Pants_ · · Score: 1

      I'm only 18 so I never got that feeling. But now I feel like I'm getting to experience the same sort of excitement, which in itself, is exciting

      --
      Look it's a joke about my sig IN MY SIG! LOL!
  150. Inventions? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    I think funding space exploration is important and necessary, however:

    "Velcro" - http://www.hookandpile.com/hook-loop-invention.htm l

    Invented by a swiss guy in the 40's.

    "GPS" - Its a product of satellites, something NASA didn't invent; the Russians had a satellite first, and Arthur Clark argues that he invented the communications satellite (although thankfully, he did not patent the idea).

    "Cellular Telephones" - Invented by Hedi Lemar. You'll think I'm joking, but I'm not. Invented during WWII, well before NASA and space exploration.

    "discovery of the ozone hole which arguably launched the widespread efforts to fix our planet" - See my argument via GPS. Same idea here.

    "Tang" - Okay. You got me.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  151. The name of PKD's short story... by conan776 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it: "Spirit's Flash ROM can remember it for you Wholesale"?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." -- Philip K. Dick
  152. Al and Arnold? by mroch · · Score: 1

    Of all the people they could invite, why would they invite Al Gore and Arnold Swlkjasdhhnegger? I can hear Al Gore now: "I invented NASA."

  153. YOU might want to listen to such a concert by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    YOU might want to listen to a concert via ionospheric bounce - I would not. For AM, you get far too much phase shift as the ionosphere fluxes, for FM that is going to show up as massive noise - only the new digital shortwave would worth listening to.

    1. Re:YOU might want to listen to such a concert by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      YOU might want to listen to a concert via ionospheric bounce - I would not. For AM, you get far too much phase shift as the ionosphere fluxes, for FM that is going to show up as massive noise - only the new digital shortwave would worth listening to.

      I didn't say it would be a *good* way of transmitting, just that it would take a comparable amount of time. ;-) But yeah, compressed digital would be the ideal way to go for that, followed by more bandwidth-wasteful two-frequency simulcast (since the two freqs would rarely fade out at the same time).

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  154. Re: ugly female astronauts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I don't know; I thought that Sally Ride was a bit of a babe.

  155. Re: its vs it's by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    An easier way is to just substitute "it is" for every occurance of "its/it's".
    If the sentence makes sense grammatically with "it is", then you can use its contraction, "it's".
    Otherwise, you should use "its".
    (E.g., "you can use it is contraction" makes no sense grammatically, so you should use "its", but "it is just one more goofy thing" does make sense grammatically, so you should use "it's".)

    The problem is that pronouns are the exception to the apostrophization of the possessive form of nouns.
    All singular non-pronounical nouns indicate the possessive form with "'s", but the pronouns don't.
    It's just one more goofy thing about the English language.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  156. Re:So, this makes what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that the ratio of failures is so high is becuase of the Soviet(Russian) missions.... the first 12 failed, no space program has a perfect record but the U.S. has by far the best starting with the Viking missions, and so far ending with 2 successful rovers on the planet now(one with a malfunction which im sure you all know about, but seems that they will be able to fix some if not all of the problems)so its hard to say that the U.S. has a high number of failures, as it has by far the highest number of successes on the red planet.

    Burton Cummings is God

  157. woohoo by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    woohoo

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.