Slashdot Mirror


India Becoming a Major Hub for Western Job Seekers

MaximusTheGreat writes: "IHT and Financial Express report that many qualified Western professionals are moving to India for jobs. Two of the most common reasons mentioned are adding the Indian experience to the CV and search of better opportunities in a booming Indian economy. According to a Mumbai based head hunting firm, "A lot of the highly qualified talent has traditionally been mobile and attracted to centers of excellence globally. This was true of the US in the early 80s when top flight talent from India migrated in search of better opportunities. Today, the same is happening to economies such as India and China" This should also bust the myth that foreigners are not allowed work in India."

830 comments

  1. Outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The task of getting first post has been outsourced to India.

    1. Re:Outsourced by DickeyWayne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know, I know, first posts are ALWAYS moderated -1 offtopic, but this one was kinda funny!

    2. Re:Outsourced by cluckshot · · Score: 0, Troll

      This Report of Western Techies going to India is a LIE. It is ILLEGAL to take a job this way in India. Sorry but India will not tolerate it. This gives the Lie to "GLOBAL MARKETS" and to the whole "Free Trade" thing.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
  2. Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is why I got out of computer science to be an electrical engineer. My advisor always encouraged me to study abroad in India because that's where everything is shifting. I did not want to do this. I hope that this trend does not continue :(

    1. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Great nigsby

    2. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curious...where do/did you go to school?

    3. Re:Uh oh . . . by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope that this trend does not continue

      Just curious, is there any outcome to any situation that will not cause mass hysteria among the /. community?

      People come to the US looking for jobs..PANIC!!!! People leave the US looking for jobs...PANIC!!! President tries to solve this problem by trying to kill all those annoying foreigners...PANIC!!!

      Jeez, I feel for you people

    4. Re:Uh oh . . . by JPriest · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why not go elsewhere, you are probably almost as well off in many other contries working for $10 than $20 in the US. You don't have to pay 30% income tax plus SSI you will never see, when you buy something you pay tax on that. The company that manufactured the product pays like 50% of what they make in taxes so they have to charge more for the product.

      You can sleep well at night knowing if you are a crack addict the government will pay your way through rehab, give you a place to stay, and money to buy crack with.

      The US government is spending money like there is no tomorrow and it only looks like the trend will get more expensive in the future.

      Many people argue that if the government quits spending so much money on foreign aid that the global economy will crash. We keep throwing away American tax dollars at foreign nations only to be the most hated country in the world. Nobody ever pays back the monoey.

      All the people that complain about the way the US does things. They should raise their nations taxes by several billion a year and take over babbysiting the rest of the world then. God knows the people that live in this country could think of better things to spend money on.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    5. Re:Uh oh . . . by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I am considering such a thing. I was born to do IT, and I could care less about staying in the US. Especially with the War on Terror, and all the other crap going on.

      Plus, for Xmas, I can have my parents send $500 instead of buying a gift. I'd live like a king for a while on that type of dough.

      Not to mention, Indian women are beautiful. ;)

    6. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you convince them that shaving is A-OK, yeah, I could see that...

    7. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never seen an indian chick with big titties. Fuck that dude. gotta get white women. with big-ass tit-ays.

    8. Re:Uh oh . . . by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just goes to show the /. community is no different than any other community. We're just as greedy and racist as the rest of the world. Generally speaking, of course. Pointing that out will get me modded down, but as we say, "Ni modo".

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Uh oh . . . by Rowdy+Yates · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that Hell has a better chance of freezing than an Indian woman who will put out for a guy she isn't married to.

    10. Re:Uh oh . . . by tealover · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, Indian women are beautiful

      Whenever I read blanket statements of this type I always wonder whether the person making the comment has a problem with women in general. As a man, I love women whereever I am at that particular moment. They are all beautiful in their own way.

      It just seems like a weird, objectifying type of comment to make.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    11. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      probably almost as well off in many other contries working for $10 than $20 in the US. You don't have to pay 30% income tax

      1. 30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"
      2. i assume you think that your taxes just evaporate or something. are you willing to live with reduced:
        1. police protection
        2. health care
        3. subsidized education
        4. general infrastructure
        5. unemployment and old age security
        6. public safety (ie fda inspections)
        7. price controls on inelastic commodities
        8. space program

      You can sleep well at night knowing if you are a crack addict the government will pay your way through rehab

      this is obviously a Bad Idea. it should be the goal of the government to ensure there are as many untreated crack heads roaming around the streets as possible.

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens... or you can ignore the problem and pay in lost economic productivity, increased policing costs and in one lump cash payment when that untreated crack head sticks you up for a fix.

      We keep throwing away American tax dollars at foreign nations only to be the most hated country in the world

      are you counting the cost of cluster bombs as a foreign aid expense?

      seriously. do you know who the single biggest recipient of us foreign aid is? israel. thirty per cent of foreign aid goes to that nation - and they are not you enemy.

      of course, the us doesn't hand out foreign aid for free. packages often come with spending restrictions that are geared towards ingratiating the recipient country to the donor and then there are saps - structural adjustment policies - whereby aid is conditional upon economic reforms in the recipient country that are beneficial to the us corporate sector.

      hint: learn something about how foreign aid works and what it does before commenting on it.

      They should raise their nations taxes by several billion a year and take over babbysiting the rest of the world then

      all the countries of the world that take part in un peacekeeping missions find your suggestion ludicrous and insulting.

    12. Re:Uh oh . . . by yiantsbro · · Score: 2

      "....30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"..."

      Actually $20/hr is about $40K/year--30% is not far off for total tax here (state + federal + SS, etc). Your take home pay will be something like 70%-74% of your total pay.

      The thing I really can't stand is sales tax on top of that (currently 6% where I am and working toward 7%).

    13. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went into EE? And that was supposed to be a smart move? Uh, OK.

    14. Re:Uh oh . . . by ktanmay · · Score: 1

      Well, have you actually read the two articles, let's see, which line should I paste...

      For these foreigners, the Indian experience is something which they think would add value to their future prospects. "I will put in my India experience when I return to Finland and I will have have an advantage of working abroad which I am sure will help me in my future jobs,"

      Most of the recruits are in the senior category of business heads, strategic account managers, client engagement managers, business and domain consultants and architects in age group of 30-50.

      But yes, planning on joining the IT industry now is a tough proposition.

    15. Re:Uh oh . . . by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      And bathing!

    16. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      well... i just got out my pay stub and a calculator and added up all my deductions: federal, proviincial, cpp, ei and my voluntary "extra deduction" (to ensure i don't get a bill at tax time) and it came to...

      26.3%

      which is more than 16 but still way less than 30... and i live in canada! where we have things like single payer health care and government subsidies for just about everything...

      nothing personal, but it sounds like you americans are getting ripped off! more tax, less service... sheesh.

    17. Re:Uh oh . . . by peter+hoffman · · Score: 1

      True, and by the time you are through paying the other taxes the government collects such as gasoline tax, "sin" taxes on alcohol and tobacco, and via various fees (such as driver's, fishing, and hunting licenses) you are taking home noticeably less than 70%.

    18. Re:Uh oh . . . by blue+trane · · Score: 2, Informative

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens... or you can ignore the problem and pay in lost economic productivity, increased policing costs and in one lump cash payment when that untreated crack head sticks you up for a fix.

      Just thought I'd mention (I probably shouldn't but what the hell, I ain't afraid): here in Seattle, the people who control the crack control a lot of things. There is so much money in crack, they can afford to buy up businesses and bribe public officials. One rumor I heard was that the governor of the state was involved. There is a "Family" here (crackheads on the street greet each other with the term of endearment "Fam"). It is very extensive. They have "managers" and such. They use technology very extensively and widely to spy on things, organize gangs quickly via cellphone, etc. It is very hard to believe at first. But they thrive on not being visible, on everyone being afraid to speak out and say what is obvious and what everyone knows anyway.

      Personally I say, legalize the fucking crack and take the power away from hardened criminals.

      (Read my journal if you want to know more. Thanks.)

    19. Re:Uh oh . . . by tealover · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Considering that your username is from an '80s cartoon, I would wager that you're a loner, nerd type, probably not used to dealing with "real" women.

      You probably spend a lot of time fantasizing about going to a poor, 3rd world nation where you can start over again and pick up the local women who are clearly, in your mind, not as sophisticated or discerning as "real" women.

      Stay anonymous. It proves my theory.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    20. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that racist? He doesn't want to move to India just to have a job. Sheesh.

    21. Re:Uh oh . . . by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    22. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      26.3%? Off of how much income?

      I've suspected for a long time that us Americans have been getting ripped off and we've been fed lies that the "socialst countries" pay huge amounts of taxes.....

      I paid about 28%-29% off of $35k last year....and that was just in payroll taxes (FICA/Medica, Fed and State)....
      You add on sales tax, property tax and all the other little taxes (gas, power, phone, etc) and I probably pay about 40% of what I "earn" in taxes...

      America is going into the crapper and unless the people decide we are not going to take it up the a$$ anymore, we are all doomed

    23. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      troll'd!

    24. Re:Uh oh . . . by jadavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been my theory that the U.S. government is particularly destructive to the economy because the population here is much more than, say, Canada.

      Americans are getting ripped off... 15% wage taxes go striaght to Washington, D.C., for Social Security and Medicare (and that's not even the other income taxes, yet!). They tell you that your employer pays half and you pay half, but that's just a political game and anyone who has read an Econ 101 book knows it.

      What are the chances that money actually comes back to the taxpayers in any meaningful way? With politicians so far removed from the people, and eveyone looking to the Federal government rather than the state government for all legislation, there is just no accountability any more.

      Different states don't really matter much any more. There's no way to hold the politicians in Washington D.C. accountable, and they are the ones with all the power. Do we really need laws about education at the national level? Labor laws at the national level? National minimum wage? Have the states all pass different laws and then see which are successful. When your state does something wrong, you just kick the old guy out and elect a movie star, no problem.

      Localize government! Move power from the feds to the state and from the state to the localities.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    25. Re:Uh oh . . . by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      The consulting industry has always been marred by those who got into it strictly for the money, who go from one contract to the next, chasing dollars, and who would drop a client at a heartbeat for a higher rate. People like this have always given the industry a bad name and were a big part of the backlash against consultants in the late 80's/early 90's (I know, I was there).

      They want to leave? Let them. More jobs for the rest of us.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    26. Re:Uh oh . . . by Ryosen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trust me, lad. You know not of what you speak.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    27. Re:Uh oh . . . by T-Bills · · Score: 1

      15% sales tax in Ontario, and there ain't much we can do about that either!!

    28. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens... or you can ignore the problem and pay in lost economic productivity, increased policing costs and in one lump cash payment when that untreated crack head sticks you up for a fix.

      Or you could have the government buy a bullet for each of them and go to hell. Tradeoffs everywhere...

      I dunno, maybe we could get some of the money saved from that put into a fund so we can buy you a shift key.

    29. Re:Uh oh . . . by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm... just calculated mine... 38.5% (wow, I never realized it was this much).

      (this doesn't include 401K, etc., just federal, state, city, medicare, blah blah blah blah, and you end up with very little of the actual `money').

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    30. Re:Uh oh . . . by apankrat · · Score: 1

      We're just as greedy and racist as the rest of the world.

      May I ask what particular race would you be referring here to ?

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    31. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Oh good golly, trolled by a high user number.

      Thank you, come again!

      Who you calling racist? If anything, people on Slashdot tend to be nationalist (i.e. my country rules and here's why). It's not much different than racism at it's core, fueled by ignorance. Once you learn more about country X (in this case India), you'll see that you're not that different. Then again, India has 25% poverty and a magic factory for churning out real doctors, computer scientists, and Dell call center people. I don't know how they balance the two but it sounds like a fascinating place.

    32. Re:Uh oh . . . by soundcore · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. Man are you the one who is ignorant:

      "30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"

      It's you who have the fact problem - most Americans pay way more than 30% - more like 50%. For example if you live in CA and make more than $75K a year you pay 38% fed, 9% CA, plus $.18 federal and $.18 state on every gallon of gas you pump, illegal phone taxes mandated by Al Gore (but never passed by Congress), taxes on your car, hotels, energy, everything except air. In reality Americans are being taxed into the poor house.

      "i assume you think that your taxes just evaporate or something."

      They do. We pay and pay and pay and get nothing in return from the gov't. It's theft plain and simple.

      "are you willing to live with reduced:"

      police protection -- We already are
      health care -- The U.S. health care system is collapsing. The average American cannot affod health insurance.

      subsidized education -- Subsidized by whom?

      general infrastructure -- The roads in SIlicon Valley are collapsing. No infrastructure there.

      unemployment and old age security -- Social Security is approaching insolvency.

      public safety (ie fda inspections) -- We had 9/11 and now mad cow. That's the kind of 'saftey' we get for our 50%.

      price controls on inelastic commodities -- Why?
      space program -- The space program is paid for 100% with BORROWED MONEY, not taxes. Check your figures. 100% of all taxes collected in the U.S. go to pay the interest on the debt, not 'programs'. Programs are paid for by borrowing, not by taxes. Which is just the way the bankers like it.

    33. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reading your post made me think. Although we may have national minimum wage, the percentage of folks working for minimum wage varies greatly from state to state. Also employment rules are different in each state (look at Virginia for a sad example). Since there's a national minimum wage, Wal Mart doesn't get to exploit people any further than it already does. Setup a distribution center in the poorest part of Kentucky or wherever, charge a crap wage, and people will flock. If national minimum wage wasn't in effect, do you think any large company would feel compelled to pay people the same? Doubtful.

      Thank god that most states now have no state tax. Some of the worst states like Oklahoma still live off the fat of their constituents, but Texas does not. Oklahoma is thankfully in the minority when it comes to state income tax. You can live better in Texas with an Oklahoma wage than you can with that same money in OK.

      I do agree with your point about the federal government being too automatic now, but it's your fellow voter's fault. Voter apathy has led this government to where it now stands, and voter apathy will continue to let the fatcats in Washington do whatever they want. There's no accountability because nobody really cares. Plus you have media spin that makes issues magically disappear when a crisis erupts. Ultimately, we'll be worse than some Third World countries, corruption-wise.

      I'll leave you with something I told my wife sometime. She's from Thailand and asked a very succinct question one day. "Why isn't the government here corrupt (compared to Thailand)?" My answer? "It is, it's just better at keeping it quiet."

    34. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      My advice to you: move if you can. A few states do NOT have state income tax anymore. I said earlier that most don't but actually only a handful don't. Check out this list at http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/ind_inc.html

    35. Re:Uh oh . . . by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      I never seen an indian chick with big titties.

      Uh, really? In my experience, many of them tend to be full-figured (I don't mean overweight, I just mean non-skinny, or "developed")...

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
    36. Re:Uh oh . . . by berzerke · · Score: 1, Troll

      ...Once you learn more about country X (in this case India), you'll see that you're not that different...

      My knowledge (indirect) says yes it is. I remember watching a special (on Discovery Channel I think) called "Come Home Alive". One episode was about a medical student (who looked Indian to me) and his wife (moved from India when was about 6) and how, despite looking the same, were abused at every opportunity.

      They had their water and electric cut off for a while, simply because they were Americans. When he was kidnapped, the police helped the kidnappers. Apparently the police in India are paid rather poorly and bribes are done pretty much openly. Indian lawyers hired by his family to help him charged his family American rates, not the local rates.

      He (and his family) eventually bribed some people to help him escape, and fled back to the US. He has no desire to ever go back. This is not to say all Indians are bad. His Indian roommate (after his wife had it with the abuse and moved back to the US) did what he could to help him and it was his wife's uncle that was the getaway driver.

      There are differences. Americans are not liked in many parts of the world.

    37. Re:Uh oh . . . by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      26.3%, which is more than 16 but still way less than 30..

      Umm, it's more than twice as close to 30% as it is to 16%

      --
      ---
    38. Re:Uh oh . . . by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
      reduced... police protection -- we already are

      er. reduced from what? last year? last century? i am talking about police protection levels lower than they are currently - hence the word "reduced". you are talking about... i'm not sure what.

      subsidized education -- Subsidized by whom?

      it's been a long time since i've been to the states... do they have cover charges for high school now?

      general infrastructure -- The roads in SIlicon Valley are collapsing.

      the roads in silicon valley exist. were they created on the sixth day by god?

      unemployment and old age security -- Social Security is approaching insolvency.

      and paying less tax will help this... how? social security exists. is this another "sixth day" creation? nope. taxes, my lad.

      public safety (ie fda inspections) -- We had 9/11 and now mad cow. That's the kind of 'saftey' we get for our 50%.

      thanks for bringing up mad cow. thanks to your tax dollars, the infected beef was caught at the distribution level and prevented from ever getting to market. is less tax worth dying of vCJD?

      100% of all taxes collected in the U.S. go to pay the interest on the debt

      well, looking at the wikipedia page on the the us national debt, i notice that it says "47% of personal income taxes" go to servicing the debt. no corporate taxes, no sales taxes, no "sin" taxes - just personal income taxes, and less than half at that.

      now, that's still a huge debt-servicing cost, but it isn't, as you claim, "100% of all taxes collected in the U.S.".

      Ha ha. Man are you the one who is ignorant:

      back at you pal.

    39. Re:Uh oh . . . by avyakrta · · Score: 0

      beautiful and brainy too ..... :-)

      --
      Truth prevails.......
    40. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Known Coward - I always thought you were an Indian.

    41. Re:Uh oh . . . by oobob · · Score: 1

      Who died and made Steve Forbes president? Without context (read: tax bracket, state taxes, etcetcetc), that means nothing. Ever try and use planar geometric formulas on spheres? -Oobob

    42. Re:Uh oh . . . by OsamaBinLogin · · Score: 1

      I've heard scandinavian countries with more like 50% to 70% income taxes - yup, you take home less than half.

      BUT you get free healthcare and all sorts of other stuff.

      [Wonder what taxes are like in mexico...]

      --
      Marketing-driven companies end up over-marketing their products. Engineering-driven companies end up over-engineering
    43. Re:Uh oh . . . by cmacb · · Score: 1, Troll

      "People come to the US looking for jobs..PANIC!!!! People leave the US looking for jobs...PANIC!!! President tries to solve this problem by trying to kill all those annoying foreigners...PANIC!!!"

      Actually the two things are related. They have been sending people here to set up consultancies for years. They get start-up funding like you wouldn't believe from back home. A guy that worked for me graduated about a month before taking a job at our company. I helped him get through the H1B visa process hardly knowing what the thing was at the time. he worked for us for a year or so, then went out and bought a Farrari (sp?), a huge house, and started his own company. Just like that. Now he ships work back to India.

      I have no problem with him doing this, or with the fat cats back in India helping him.

      I DO have a problem with the morons here in congress who voted (and continue to vote) for extending the H1B visa program so that more and more of this can happen. H1B has been a total failure, in addition to making terrorist infiltration easier, we have lost jobs, productivity, and economic stability as a results. Just wait 'till all the results are in.

      Maybe we should be allowed to vote in some politicians from India. I bet the problem would get straightened out real fast if that were a possibility.

    44. Re:Uh oh . . . by slipgun · · Score: 1

      ...at it's core, fueled by ignorance

      Oh, the irony.

      (Btw, I agree that racism is fueled by ignorance but disagree that nationalism and racism are the same thing).

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    45. Re:Uh oh . . . by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      Thank god that most states now have no state tax. Some of the worst states like Oklahoma still live off the fat of their constituents, but Texas does not. Oklahoma is thankfully in the minority when it comes to state income tax. You can live better in Texas with an Oklahoma wage than you can with that same money in OK. Don't be an idiot. States having income taxes is a very good thing. It means they can have lower sales taxes. Its trading a very regressive tax for a progressive tax. Plus you get to deduct your state income tax from your federal income tax which makes it even more progressive.

    46. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the roads in silicon valley exist. were they created on the sixth day by god?

      This perfectly illustrates the dangers of a text based medium for commnuications. If you were talking to an American in real life and mentioned religion you'd see the mad staring look come into his eyes and have the chance to try to change the conversation quickly (maybe mention guns, that should divert them). On the internet you don't see what you've done until it's too late.

    47. Re:Uh oh . . . by e.colli · · Score: 0

      There are differences. Americans are not liked in many parts of the world.

      "E a reciproca e verdadeira"
      We ever tend to generalise by picking one or two stories. And I bet there are lots of terror stories with foreign people in US like have in any other country, but those are the general rule or special cases?

      Racism is a common place everywhere and job outsorcing tends to generate flames and more racism. I think that we have to see others countries people just like ourselves, with desires and necessities.

    48. Re:Uh oh . . . by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
      30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"
      Is 30% so unbelievable? I wish... Dutch income tax starts at 32%, and it's progressive, so anything over 20.000 Euro is taxed at 42% The highest rate is 52%... at some point, our state will let you keep less than half of what you earn.. Oh, we have VAT too: 19.5%

      Of course we get many goodies for all that money, like healthcare.... wait a minute. Then what is that 150 Euro health care insurance bill I pay every month?! We get roads... but I pay 50 Euro a month road tax, 70 cents tax on every liter of petrol, and 45% on a new vehicle!. I shit you not, look here if you don't believe me. Oh... The 19.5% VAT comes on top of that. More than half of what I paid for my new car went to taxes.
      i assume you think that your taxes just evaporate or something.
      Well, I am starting to believe it...
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    49. Re:Uh oh . . . by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Well.. imagine a country where incomee tax ranges from 40% to 63% for everyone, and on top of that, you have 25% VAT on everything you buy.

      (This not counting ~180% tax on cars, 100% tax on power (kWh), and similar (but lower) tax on everything else, and yes, they ar cumulative)

      Yes, there is such a country.

    50. Re:Uh oh . . . by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem"

      You are paying only 16% in total income taxes on $20/hour and you live in Canada?

      I think you have a "reality problem".

      Troll.

    51. Re:Uh oh . . . by DrLarry · · Score: 1

      you are going to pay for society's drug problems one way or another. you can either pony up some tax to get crack heads off the street, into rehab and turn them into productive citizens...

      ahem....I suppose you mean happy citizens
      --
      came exnihilo, going back there soon
    52. Re:Uh oh . . . by DivideX0 · · Score: 1

      "subsidized education -- Subsidized by whom?"

      "it's been a long time since i've been to the states... do they have cover charges for high school now? "

      Actually, schools are paid by a whole other tax, usually property tax on house, land, condo, etc.

      --
      My next Slashdot post will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    53. Re:Uh oh . . . by fab13n · · Score: 1
      Not to mention, Indian women are beautiful. ;)

      I wonder whether the mandatory "imagine a beowulf cluster of these" would be appropriate here...

    54. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "30% tax on $20/hr? even here in "socialist" canada it's more like 16%. i think you have a "fact problem""

      My heart bleeds for you hard done to Americans.

      Come to the UK and live in Foney Tony's New Socialist Utopia.

      Where upity freelance software developers, like me, now have to fork out 40% income tax and 24% national insurance on our earnings. (Which in reality is a moot point because most of us are now out of work anyway).

      Guess where an increasing number of the highly skilled western immigrants to India come from?

    55. Re:Uh oh . . . by fab13n · · Score: 1
      Do we really need laws about education at the national level?

      I don't know if you ever noticed, but USA get a share of world's wealth par capita that's slightly above average. Did you ever wonder why? Do you think that big compagnies keep paying american people the salary of 10 chinese or indian people, just by patriotism?

      Western world, and esp. USA, can have and keep (?) such high salaries just because one finds there skills you couldn't find in poorer countries. Because people are a lot better educated, either thanks to education system, or thanks to global brain drain.

      Other countries understood that, and a couple of decades ago, India started massively investing into education; USA IT workers can tell you what a wise investment it was. Now there's a permanent race on skills and education between countries that will keep accelerating, and if wealthier countries stop racing, they will soon stop being wealthier.

      Maybe you expect every local governor to understand that and act accordingly, or you consider that global USA wealth is not a problem of federal importance. Maybe you think that a nationally coherent politics wouldn't help for this. But as long as federal government is not ruled by an illiterate redneck that can't understand the nasty effects of simple and false solutions to complicated problems, you should really consider education as a federal issue.

      Oh wait...

    56. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm Indian by heritage and I speak two Indian languages fluently, although I was born and raised in Europe.. (oh, and I don't speak them by choice really, I just knew them since I was really young because of my parents).
      I lived in India for a few months (just cause it was warmer, I don't actually like the place), and I never had any problems.

      I think this dude moved to the middle of nowhere. To be honest, I think he might have similar problems if he moved to a small town in the middle of nowhere in one of the vowelstates in the US (vowelstates = states that start with a vowel) :).

      I find it highly unlikely something like that would happen in Mumbai, Delhi or Banglore. Don't think that the whole of India is like that because of a show on Discovery. I mean, how interesting would it be to watch a show about an american family who moved to India, and everything worked out perfectly fine?

      Americans are not liked in many parts of the world.

      That may be true, but Americans are, in my opinion based on my experience, fairly liked in India.

      BTW, in regards to the article, my advise is, don't move to India!!
      Not because you will get kidnapped or something, but just cause the country is like 50years behind in time.

      This is what I think of India:
      Cheap!
      Dirty!
      Corrupted!
      Overpopulated!
      Overpopulated!
      Overpopulated!
      Overpopulated!

      Trust me, the amount of people randomly sleeping everywhere started to annoy the hell out of me after a while... and when I was travelling around I stayed in towns where the crap from the toilets was running alongside the road.. now, I may sound like a spoiled person, but I don't care.. I will not live in a country where I can take a dump, flush the toilet, walk outside and see my crap!

    57. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, property owners pay a school tax.

    58. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After taxes, 401K, and child support I take home exactly 41% of what I make. After my car payment, insurance, cell phone etc. I have just enough money from my high paying job to live with my parents anyway.

    59. Re:Uh oh . . . by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the sheep whose minds Arthur Dent touched, who kept getting startled at the sun rising in the morning and so forth.

      Yes I just called /. posters sheep.

      --
      --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
    60. Re:Uh oh . . . by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      I just added up mine and it's 26% and that's in the District of Columbia.

      We _ARE_ getting ripped off, no illusions about it. You know, we spend a TRILLION dollars per year on Social Security and Medicare. That's $3,389 for every breathing human being in the country and something ridiculous like 45 million have _zero_ health coverage. That doesn't mean "no private insurance" either. That means "no private insurance AND the government won't pay their medical bills if they end up in the hospital."

      One year, when I got laid off, I missed the deadline to continue my $400/month insurance by three days. Figuring, I'm 29 at the time, not a HUGE risk, I'll shop around. I ended up on that third day in cardiac care to the tune of $27,000--and completely ineligible for any government subsidy because my previous year's income was too high. No matter that I had NO income at the time and that in the prior two years my tax bill was, ironically, $27,000, the government paid ZERO. I had been paying JUST TO MEDICARE over $4,000 per year in taxes.

      Of course, the hospitals have to provide service regardless of ability to pay, so in the end it comes off their taxes and they make up the difference by raising their charges into the stratosphere--you know, the $400/month premium for a single 29yo male with no "pre-existing conditions" who has never spent a single day in any hospital as anything but a visitor.

      Yeah. Ripped off. BIG time.

    61. Re:Uh oh . . . by rabs · · Score: 1

      Just curious, is there any outcome to any situation that will not cause mass hysteria among the /. community?

      How about this outcome: "US economy doing great, IT workers satisfied that they can support themselves and their families."

      - rabs

    62. Re:Uh oh . . . by muffen · · Score: 1
      Hmm... just calculated mine... 38.5%

      Ahh... you fortunate people..

      I'm from Sweden, and this is the taxsituation in the country with the worlds highest taxpressure!

      Public Revenue from Taxes and Social Security Contributions as Percentage of the Gross Domestic Product.

      Sweden:

      1975 = 43,4%

      1985 = 50%

      1995 = 47,6%

      1998 = 52%

      1999 = 52,1%

      2000 = 52%

      Canada:

      1975 = 33,1%

      1985 = 33,1%

      1995 = 35,7%

      1998 = 37,4%

      2000 = 37,4%

      So, you guys thought you were paying a lot of taxes huh? :)

    63. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What amount of tax you pay is irrelevant - we don't even know how much you earn so how can we compare your tax rate to anything? An average would be far more useful.

    64. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know bill gates donates more money in aid to africa than the united states does?

    65. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH please....

      "There are differences. Americans are not liked in many parts of the world."

      Yes, primarily in hell-holes that a decent person would want to live.

      Move to India? I rather clean out sewers in New Jersey rather than move to India to be president of the largest company there (probably not a beef related concern).

      The lowest job in the US is higher than the most prestigious job in India.

    66. Re:Uh oh . . . by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      Yes but u forget to mention the before tax salary is quite a bit higher than countries with lower tax rates, or that the astronomical tax rates make sweden one of the nicest places to live in the world...despite the perpetual darkness.

    67. Re:Uh oh . . . by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly what my opinion has always been, wouldnt it be so much easier if they just legalised everything, made it only available from pharmacies (so the quality could be regulated) and put a BIG sticker on it saying something to the effect of "take this and it will KILL you". I think if high schools actually provided some education on the actual effects (both good and bad) of so-called illicit drugs on a persons body rather than just shouting "JUST SAY NO TO DRUGS" any time the issue is raised then there would be less of a problem. Take away the mystique and illicit nature of drugs and they loose their appeal pretty quickly once people are able to weigh up the pros and cons for themselves.

    68. Re:Uh oh . . . by leifw · · Score: 1

      Note: In Canada you'd pay at least 14% sales tax as well. Sadly some localities in the States are beginning to approach this.

    69. Re:Uh oh . . . by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      If Canada boardered Mexico, I'll bet that you'll have to pay more for government subsidies for just about everything.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    70. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, that why you are unemployed, because "those people" took your job.

      start learning how to say, "thank you come again"

    71. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Who's the idiot here? Texas and Oklahoma have about the same sales tax. In Dallas it's 8.25 percent, in Oklahoma it varies by city, as high as 8.8 percent in Elk City and as low as 7.25 percent in The Village (small upper class suburb in north OKC). To add insult to injury, Oklahomans have to force others to pay sales tax, even when shipping to people out of state. Also if you make any money on any holding on Oklahoma, when your money leaves the state it's taxed as state income. It's an archaic, backwards system designed to keep people broke. Seems to be working pretty well.

    72. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd rather drive a shitty old car and do w/o a cellphone than live w/ my parents. It's all about priorities, man.

      Oh, and it's not exactly the govt's fault that you're paying child support, now is it?

    73. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because our taxes are going to support commercial interests. For example, "Dubyah" just signed a bill into law that provides more benefits to drug companies and less benefits to medicare recipients.

    74. Re:Uh oh . . . by ChrisN79 · · Score: 0

      You must be forgetting about the GST and PST, which if I remember correctly, totals 15% in sales tax (in Ontario anyways) -- that adds up. Even the highest sales tax in the US only comes to about 7 or 8%... and most are much lower than that.

    75. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea, as if electrical engineering jobs are not outsourcable??

    76. Re:Uh oh . . . by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Gee Whiz, I guess that if lots of young Americans seek work abroad maybe some of us older guys might possibly be able to get work again? HERE in the USA!

      I'm not too old, I'm "overqualified".

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    77. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this doesn't include 401K, etc.

      Did you include items that you don't really see, like 30 cents a gallon gas taxes? What about when you buy a movie ticket the property taxes the cinema pays for the ground it is on?

    78. Re:Uh oh . . . by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      The problem then is that Oklahoma is taxing too much in total. It has nothing to do with the fact that they are collect that tax through an income tax. For the same amount of taxing, income taxes are *far* better than sales taxes or property taxes, as they are the most progressive, which encourages economic growth.

    79. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch it with the New Jersey crack bub.

    80. Re:Uh oh . . . by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      Don't forget VAT.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    81. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you become unemployed soon. Replaced by an Indian for a fraction of your salary!

    82. Re:Uh oh . . . by hutkey · · Score: 1

      i think there is no shame to go where u will find what you want, even if it means to go abroad to get it. if it is the best of r interest then go and do it. we indians alwys keep open mind to this and try to be as hospitable as possible. all people are welcome here.

    83. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >BUT you get free healthcare and all sorts of other stuff.

      NOT YOU DON'T! Your paying high taxes for gov't health services. Nothing is free.

    84. Re:Uh oh . . . by jadavis · · Score: 1

      Maybe you expect every local governor to understand that and act accordingly.

      Yeah, that's the point. That a governor combined with the state legislature and the propositions can construct some kind of education system. If what they do works, other states will copy it. If what they do fails, they will hopefully copy another state's plan.

      Of course education is important. Nobody is arguing about that. I think that a national system would be more subject to corruption and dismal performance than 50 state eduacational systems.

      Whatever the U.S. is doing now as far as education is not working terribly well. I don't think that some huge national system has any hope of really working, and any benefit over state systems. States are large enough entities to run schools, so why are the feds involved? What do they do aside from corrupt the system?

      We should give powers from the states to the federal government only when it serves some great benefit, like the common defense or a common currency. Otherwise, let the states compete for success.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    85. Re:Uh oh . . . by abohart · · Score: 1

      And then, of course, people like you have to prolong the agony by pointlessly bitching about what other people have to say. If you don't like what people have to say here, go to some other site.

    86. Re:Uh oh . . . by angsuman · · Score: 1

      Ouch!
      That's inane comment! I have stayed in US for 6.5 years and now I have started my business in India. I have never faced any trouble on account of my US stay, sometimes it actually helped.
      And that is the general picture as I see and hear with my friends across the country.

      > They had their water and electric cut off for a while, simply because they were Americans.

      I don't know what you have seen in discovery channel but never will electricity and water be cut because you are an American! They are controlled by mostly government or closely regulated entities and they cannot and will not do any such thing. What comes to mind is most likely they didn't pay the bill in time.

    87. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a putz!
      lets hear some pointers, dammit!
      We have lotsa indian wimmin at work, but they are all either married or have indian "boyfriend" or ...
      so what is the secret?
      How do I get into her pants?
      (no, I'm not talking about a specific "her", I'm trying to get one of the variety)

    88. Re:Uh oh . . . by Urox · · Score: 1
      The infected beef still got to some restaurants and they weren't releasing the information on who unless that specific restaurant called in.

      If our tax dollars are paying for it, it shouldn't be termed as "proprietary".

      --
      "Would you rather have a playstation addicted dork wearing a star wars t-shirt?"
    89. Re:Uh oh . . . by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The panic that the poster describes. That what I'm calling racist. And yes I agree that nationalism and racism is the same. Any attempt to place yourself above another is, in my mind at least, a bad thing.

      Paraphrasing: The UN today made an annoucement equating zionism with racism. To which, Sammy Davis Jr. was heard to say, "What a breakthrough. Now I can hate myself."

      --
      What?
    90. Re:Uh oh . . . by rleibman · · Score: 1

      In the U.S.
      Add to that:
      Sales tax (another 7.5% on everything you buy, sometimes more).
      Property taxes
      License and permit fees for everything under the sun.
      Bonds and similar
      Did you put in the 7.5% of social insecurity your employer pays on your behalf?
      Direct and indirect costs to comply with uncountable regulations.

      I bet the actual number is much higher than 60% in the U.S.

    91. Re:Uh oh . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are on crack!!!
      You are saying that you paye 16% tax in Canada? Wake up. I worked 4 years in Montreal, and about 80% of my revenue went to the various levels of government.

      -Paycheck:
      16% of federal/provincial income tax taken directly from my paycheck.
      (I had 35% on my paycheck, but I made a lot more than 20$/h)
      Another 15% in various "social security" like unemployment and drug prescription program just to name two, the list had at least 6 items (and more like 12).

      -Sales tax:
      Then I had to pay another 15.56% in sells tax (please note the federal tax is taxable by the provincial tax!!!)

      - Then you must take into account the "special sales" tax, included in the displayed price.
      80% on gas.
      80% on cigarette (no I don't smoke)
      80% on most of the alcohol (a little less for beers in store, but not in bars).
      80% on "luxury" items, like gold, diamonds, "big name" items, like Piaget watches, or Mont-Blanc stuff, and another 2% on Mercedes, Ferrarie... (paid right off the boat as an "extra" import tax).

      - Indirect taxes:
      THEN, you have "indirect taxes" like
      76$ every 2 year for your drivers license.
      250$ a year for the license plates on your car.
      Parking meters (2$ an hour downtown Montreal)
      Tool both (now removed from numerous highways)

      Many other things like "permits" for this and that; parking tickets or other violations that most of the citizen constantly gets (cops have quotas to fill). My dad got a ticket because he did not bought a permit to cut down a tree about to fall on the neighbor's house after a big storm!

      - Property tax:
      A 2 to 10% of the property value to the city (garbage, water, sewer, ...)
      A 2 to 5% of the property value to the local school system (non-rural area).

      - And we could add a lot more things like 10$ for parking in a federal building, or 35$ to open a case in court! All funds going directly into the public services budget!

      - Finally add all the import tax that increase the price of goods to protect the local market! But I don't take that into account.

      So, if you look at your paycheck, you have this "feel good" feeling you are paying only 16% in tax, but calculate everything and you will see at the end of the year about 80% of your revenue goes to some level of government.

      I am now back in the US, 24% of my salary goes off my paycheck everything included (tax, social security, health care, ...). A 80% tax on gas (CA), 10% on acohol, cigs, ...). Overall at least 50% of my pay goes directly in my bank account.

    92. Re:Uh oh . . . by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      That'd be funnier if Sammy Davis was still alive. You can always substitute Whoopi Goldberg for any comedian-who's-black-and-jewish-telling-a-joke statement.

      Zionism, as I understand it, revolves around the belief that Zion is God's chosen land and Jewish folks are God's chosen people. For one group to believe they are god's chosen is pure folly (from a christian viewpoint) and I can see how one could draw lines between that and racism. However it's unusual for the UN to make an announcement to this effect. Then again, look at what the Israeli government does to people that aren't Jewish in their country. Their system of rights is all fucked up...you can't even get buried in Israel if you're not Israeli.

      I guess I might see it differently if I were living there, but I don't.

    93. Re:Uh oh . . . by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The joke came a very old "Saturday Night Live". Chevy Chase's Weekend Update. 1975 or 76 I believe. Sammy Davis was THE black/Jewish comedian/singer/actor(?) of the time.

      --
      What?
  3. Exciting by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey, free movement of labor is required for fairness of free movement of capital.

    Depending on what sort of world you want, I guess.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:Exciting by MisterFancypants · · Score: 3, Funny
      The other part that makes it exciting is they might get nuked by the Pakistanis at any time.

      Livin' on the bleeding edge of technology!

    2. Re:Exciting by terraformer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Depending on what sort of world you want, I guess.

      This is exactly the problem w/ free trade. Conservatives want it for obvious reasons and progressives want it since they mistakenly believe it will bring up the standards of living in the target countries. Although it does (bring up the std of living), it does so through achieving equilibrium. The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group. To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case. In the absence of this plan, the only people who benefit from free trade are the really rich as they income gap increases.

      The facts bear out the assertion that the rich are benefitting from this arrangement since both the US and Mexico have seen a shrinking of their middle class and a growth in the income gap between top and bottom. Also, in the absence of a smart plan for implementing free trade, it allows the corporations to continue to support corrupt regimes with total impunity, with no control by any authority.

      Welcome to the new world...

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    3. Re:Exciting by eraserewind · · Score: 2

      It doesn't necessarily have to mean that the people who started out rich will end up at a lower absolute level of standard of living. It only means that the relative standard of livings are supposed to become balanced. Trade is not a zero sum game.

      That's the theory anyway. As you point out, in practise it doesn't seem to be working out quite so neatly. The rich now control a greater % of the worlds absolute wealth than in the past, and this is only increasing. I have seen several times mentioned that the average "real" income for people in the US has been in decline since the 1970s.

    4. Re:Exciting by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      From ny experience, 20 years ago inflation in Mexico was running about 125% a year, but everything seemed to remain affordable. Now with NAFTA, inflation may be down, but the prices are almost as high as in the states, but the wages are nowhere near that. Prices still do climb, but wages appears stagnant. Gasoline, electricity, milk, toilet paper, etc. are actually more expensive than in the states. I don't know how the people tolerate it. But they do.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Exciting by xzap · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not likely seeing how the 'Father' of Pakistan's nuclear program has just been fired for illegally selling nuclear secrets to Libya and Iran.

    6. Re:Exciting by spasm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      " The other part that makes it exciting is they might get nuked by the Pakistanis at any time."

      As opposed to the US, hated by 2/3 of the world's population, & obvious target # 1 for more minor excitements like, um, 9/11..

    7. Re:Exciting by Quixote · · Score: 1
      Just like the US and Russia got nuked by each other?

      Just because there are nukes in the neighborhood it does not mean they could get 'nuked anytime'.

      India has clearly told Pakistan: they can take a strike or two, but Pakistan will be wiped off the face of the earth if they pull anything like this. YAD (Your Assured Destruction), anyone? :)

    8. Re:Exciting by espo812 · · Score: 1
      The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group.
      Fortunately, economics is NOT a zero sum game (see: Wealth of Nations, Smith, 1776.)
      --

      espo
    9. Re:Exciting by terraformer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have read it and if you read what I wrote, you will see I was talking about the execution of a specific trade policy, not about generic and ideal trade theory. There is no such thing as a perfect market since there is no such thing as perfect information. Ideal markets do not, and will never exist. So the focus has to be on the trade policy and how that policy has been implemented. My suggestion is that the execution of this specific trade policy has been set up to benefit one group over another.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    10. Re:Exciting by tealover · · Score: 1

      Hatred is usually fueled by jealousy. A lot of that particularly after Bush just steamrolled through Iraq and gave a big Fuck You to the UN, France, Germany and Russia at the same time.

      No other country could get away with that.

      They may hate the US, but they certainly respect the asswhupping it can dish out.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    11. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lmfao

      (this text here to bypass lameness filter. Damn it, why can't I laugh out loud without being ruled lame! HAH owned. )

    12. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could, of course, just shut the fuck up and not pepper this conversation with useless acronyms such as LOL, ROLF and LAMO.

    13. Re:Exciting by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      Just like the US and Russia got nuked by each other?

      just because the americans and russians didn't nuke each other doesn't mean the pakistanis and indians won't.

      assuming the us/ussr situation has any bearing on the india/pakistan situation is post hoc ergo propter hoc.

    14. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Bush is a fuckwad.

      -Yes, I was born in the US (and still live here)
      -Yes, I follow politics and international relations (degree in History)
      -No, I am not a "liberal" (Whether you agree or not would depend on where YOU are on the spectrum, I guess.)
      -No, I am not a conservative (see caveat above)

      I state, for the record... George Bush, the President of the United States of America is a fuckwad.

      (BTW.. Dick Cheney, the actual leader of the US government, is a fuckwad too.)

    15. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This should also bust the myth that foreigners are not allowed to work in India." Thanks, I feel so much better now.

      If it's good for India to get the jobs, how can it be good for us to lose them?

    16. Re:Exciting by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Nope...they signed an agreement against WMD.....ah shit, does it matter?

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    17. Re:Exciting by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The free movement of labor should bring much greater economic benefits than the free trade of goods. Global price differentials for goods are much less then global price differentials of labor.

    18. Re:Exciting by Ryosen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >>No other country could get away with that.

      Germany. 1938. Walked all over Austria, Poland, France. It wasn't until they started intruding on American interests (e.g. commerce with a newly recognized USSR ) that the US got involved. Of course, this quickly changed to a policy of non-agression. In fact, the US never declared war on Germany. It was actually Germany (and Italy) that declared war on the US in response to the US' declaration of war on Japan. This, of course, was in response to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The US Congress didn't declare war on Germany and Italy, instead merely "recognizing" that a state of war existed.

      The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved. Same thing with Japan. They conquered and expanded throughout Southeast Asia while the US maintained a position of isolation and apathy - even after a US gunboat was attacked by Japan off of the coast of China while providing aid to the Chinese. In fact, Japan attacked the US because America would not acquiesce to their plan for Asian domination. Realizing that war between Japan and the US was inevitable, Japan decided to strike first.

      Eventually, the rest of the world will get fed up with our antics and stand up to us. Here's hoping that our leaders wise up and stop killing America before that happens.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    19. Re:Exciting by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group.

      This is not true. Economies are not zero-sum gains. Wealth is created through free market exchanges, not merely exchanged. The basic proof is that the standard of living in the US is much higher now than it was 10 years ago.

      Your "dissapearing middle class" is a combination of former middle-class members moving into higher economic states, combined with an influx of poor immigrants into the US.

    20. Re:Exciting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Funny, America is going through the same thing. I made $15/hour in high school video taping weddings. That was fifteen years ago. Fifteen years of inflation, which has averaged 3.1%, would make that job worth $23/hour today. How many high school students today are making $23/hour doing anything, much less something that simple? I've seen jobs at otherwise respected institutions paying CS engineers with Master's degrees $18.50 per hour today. It's definitely happening on both sides. Seems people's memories don't go back further than last week on this.

      People also don't seem to notice what has happened to the balance of trade. In 1980, it was 11 billion in surplus. In 1990, it was seventy billion in deficit. In 2000, it was 355 billion in deficit--an increase of more than 500% from 1990. Today, it is half a trillion in deficit. Nah, move along. Nothing to see here.

    21. Re:Exciting by kir · · Score: 1

      Re:Exciting (Score:1, Insightful)

      You've got to be shitting me.

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    22. Re:Exciting by slpalmer · · Score: 1

      You made out better than most. Let's see. 15 years ago, I was 20. Just a couple of years out of High School. In High School, I made about $6 an hour at an IT job. (Min Wage (in TX) was $4 something at the time). Any way, this was in 1985 - 1986. Last year, I made ~62K as a UNIX Admin. I have no college, and only an HP-UX cert under my belt. The point I'm getting to (eventualy, it's Saturday, and I've been drinking) is that:
      1: I don't think $15/hour was the norm 15 years ago.
      2: I think students today make well over 3.1% over the norm from 15 years ago.

      That's all I have to say.. g'night all...

      Stephen L. Palmer
      SLP - Technical Consulting
      http://slpalmer.com

    23. Re:Exciting by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved.

      Way to fucking rewrite history. Britain, Frace, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway and others were all actively at war with Germany way before the US got reluctantly dragged into the war in Europe. Britain, Australia and New Zealand also fought against Japan in Asia and the Pacific Rim.

      Please, pick up a book or something every once in a while. The world doesn't revolve around the US.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    24. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group.

      I don't see a problem with that. Some people (us) have been getting more than their fair share for a while. We should consider ourselves lucky to have had such good fortune for so long. It's not our right.

      To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case.

      No, it requires a very simple plan: improve the average standard of living of the globe quickly enough so that it compensates for the decrease resulting from equillibration. Anything else wouldn't be a "plan", it would be a fraud.

      Of course, free trade or not, the Western lifestyle will have to change: it simply isn't sustainable, and it can't be scaled up to the rest of the world. In particular, Americans will need to live in smaller, more energy-efficient houses, take public transportation, buy more energy efficient cars, recycle more, etc.

      The facts bear out the assertion that the rich are benefitting from this arrangement since both the US and Mexico have seen a shrinking of their middle class and a growth in the income gap between top and bottom. Also, in the absence of a smart plan for implementing free trade, it allows the corporations to continue to support corrupt regimes with total impunity, with no control by any authority.

      The US middle class has lots of serious, self-created problems; don't blame Mexico or free trade for that.

    25. Re:Exciting by rocketfairy · · Score: 1

      Actually, every year hundreds of thousands of Mexicans decide not to tolerate it, and they come here. For some reason, right-wing neoliberals continue to act shocked and appalled that anyone would *think* to cross the border illegally.

    26. Re:Exciting by slipgun · · Score: 1

      The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved.

      Please, please, learn some facts before you post.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    27. Re:Exciting by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A decrease in the standard of living for the American (or $COUNTRY_X) programmers, because they can no longer charge such high prices as before. But programmers and software companies are in a tiny minority compared to the users of software and business which need to pay for it. The people who benefit from free trade are not just the Indian (or $COUNTRY_Y) programmers, but the Western businesses who are able to get what they need more cheaply, and the consumers who (assuming decent competition) get lower prices.

      Free trade is just bringing together those who have something to sell - the Indian programmers - and those who want to buy - American firms needing software written. I don't see any reason for a third group to whine about this just because they were previously able to get away with charging more.

      This is especially hypocritical on a site such as Slashdot, where readers depend on a steady supply of computer hardware often built in countries with lower wages than the West. In stories about video cards or RAM I don't think I have _ever_ seen any complaint about free trade reducing the price of the hardware and the lost job opportunties for Americans caused by building it in the Far East. Or think of the constant RIAA stories - stop trying to get in the way of progress, stop trying to prop up a failing business model, you don't automatically have the right to keep on getting money just because you did in the past. I know this is partly the fallacy of assuming Slashdot readers speak with one voice, but it's still worth noting.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    28. Re:Exciting by raahul_da_man · · Score: 1

      I guess previous history should be thrown out? You are quite wrong in this case. There is a great deal of relevance of the behaviour of other nuclear powers as to what these two will do. Neither so far has shown any deviation from the pattern of the other nuclear powers.

      And to be blunt: India is a far safer nation than the USA. Let's evaluate the most likely risk to occur, rather than the most unlikely. After all, the USA is the world's biggest and most likely target for nuclear, chemical and biological attack according to US politicians.

    29. Re:Exciting by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, why in the world will we (Americans) /have/ to live in smaller houses?

      And energy efficient? Have you built a house lately? As long as you're not some ass skimping on shitty building supplies, our houses are more efficient than anyone else in the world, I'd wager...

      Also, consider the coming boom in hybrid cars... that'll take care of that for a bit. (and if you don't believe it's coming, you're not paying attention :))

    30. Re:Exciting by rixstep · · Score: 1

      The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved.

      What a nut.

    31. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, why in the world will we (Americans) /have/ to live in smaller houses?

      Numerous reasons. One is energy efficiency. Another is housing density: big houses equal low density, and that means longer commutes.

      And energy efficient? Have you built a house lately? As long as you're not some ass skimping on shitty building supplies, our houses are more efficient than anyone else in the world, I'd wager...

      Per square foot, perhaps. Per occupant, no. Also, the construction materials themselves require lots of energy to produce, so just building a big house means consuming lots of energy. Furthermore, achieving energy efficiency through insulation has its own set of problems (lack of air circulation, etc.).

      Also, consider the coming boom in hybrid cars... that'll take care of that for a bit. (and if you don't believe it's coming, you're not paying attention :))

      SUVs and trucks are as popular as ever. Even hybrid SUVs only get the gas mileage that traditional passenger cars get. So, no, I don't see average gas mileage increasing anytime soon. And even a hybrid car takes a lot of resources to build and operate. The only long-term solution is to get away from personal automobiles altogether.

    32. Re:Exciting by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      True, due to a slew of isolationism and other politics, the US did eventually enter the war.

      I completely agree with your statement that "The world doesn't revolve around the US".

      I would also like to point out that the world would have been a different place, had the US not entered the war to begin with.

      --
      Sig it.
    33. Re:Exciting by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's been proven yet that the US can get away with that, either.

      On the other hand, how would the world respond if China were the one to steamroll through Iraq? Could even the US stop them?

      --
      -Rich
    34. Re:Exciting by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      Hated or not, I think such "minor excitements" occur more often in countries other than the US. Think about Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel or IRA bombs in the UK (thankfully not so much in recent years).

      --
      -Rich
    35. Re:Exciting by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      big houses equal low density, and that means longer commutes.

      Well ignoring the fact that no-one has to do anything, this doesn't matter. You don't seem to have noticed that more and more businesses are moving out of cities and into suburban and rural areas because the owners themselves don't like long commutes and move closer to where they live. Surburbs also often have lower taxes. I've had three full time jobs since graduation over 15 years ago and none of them has been in a large city. For my current job, before I moved, I was commuting from my home in the city to an industrial park in a semi-rural area and enjoyed an almost traffic-free commute as most traffic goes the other direction (now that we moved, my commute's even easier!).

      In any event, people do what's in their own self-interest, so I doubt you'll see many Americans choosing smaller, denser housing when land is so plentiful here. If anything, the trend seems to be going the other way here in the Midwest.
    36. Re:Exciting by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      Why do I always run out of mod points right after I see something that should be modded way the hell up?

    37. Re:Exciting by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      Good lord...you make one small grammatical error... =)

      Sorry folks. I wrote this pretty late.

      I didn't mean to imply that Germany went unchallenged, just unchallenged by the US. A huge difference, obviously, and the egg is on my face for that one.

      The US is not going unchallenged today (see France's position against the invasion of Iraq), but the responses are a bit less threatening than WWII Europe's. Then, again, the US is practicing a different kind of expansionism - one not as obvious.

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    38. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Russia would likely have defeated Nazi Germany on its own. We would then have faced Soviet Europe. That may well have altered history, but then again the USSR collapsed under its own weight in the 1990's. Oh wait, Ronald Reagan made some speech or other about the Berlin Wall - THAT was what did it - yeah right, had nothing to do with all the people who put their bodies in the way of the tanks.

      At any rate the USA saved the UK and Western Europe for several decades - nobody can take that away from them.

    39. Re:Exciting by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I think we should mandate that every american should live in a 10'x10' box with one toilet and eat soylent green. Then the third world would seem like a paradise. Ah, liberal logic...

    40. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Americans won't "choose" smaller housing, economics will force them to; that's my point.

      Competition from other nations will drive wages down and increased demand for oil and other raw materials around the world will drive prices up.

      The US is already living on borrowed time anyway: without a huge influx of foreign money, the current US standard of living would be unmaintainable.

    41. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Britain, Frace, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Norway and others were all actively at war with Germany...

      Strangely your list is missing the only one power making a difference. The USSR.

    42. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, actually no. If you had any knowledge of world economics, you would know that the world DOES currently revolve around the United States (and its economy).

    43. Re:Exciting by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      I understood what you meant, and had a good chuckle at the "fucking rewrite history" knee-jerk responses. So don't feel too bad, if one person got it, probably more people did too =)

    44. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      context

      \Con"text\, n. [L. contextus; cf. F. contexte .] The part or parts of something written or printed, as of Scripture, which precede or follow a text or quoted sentence, or are so intimately associated with it as to throw light upon its meaning.

    45. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 1

      I think we should mandate that every american should live in a 10'x10' box with one toilet and eat soylent green. Then the third world would seem like a paradise. Ah, liberal logic...

      No, the logic is that in order to prevent such a scenario, we should be more prudent in our use of resources and in our spending habits. And that doesn't require heavy-handed government regulation, it just requires an efficient market--people need to pay for what they consume.

      Right now, US consumers live in a fairy-land, in which gasoline prices are artificially low, few people pay for their retirement, and Bush sends out one military raiding party after another, to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. And it's all financed by massive borrowing, both domestically and internationally.

      Sooner or later, the US is going to run out of politically powerless groups to screw and places to borrow money from. The devaluation of the dollar is only the beginning.

    46. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think USSR controlling Europe has to be necessarily worse in the long term than this USA Bush fourth reich..

    47. Re:Exciting by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > 20 years ago inflation in Mexico was running about 125% a year, but everything seemed to remain affordable.

      Yes, it seemed -- because you are rich, or was in contact with relatively rich people who had bank accounts and perhaps government employment.

      You see, inflation is a hidden tax, where the government prints money to pay its debt. It is paid by poor people, who seem to receive good salaries which actually are worth a lot less at the end of the month. Poor people in an inflationary period usually can also get jobs or even help from rich people and the medium class.

      Now inflation is also a financial roller-coaster that eventually has to stop. When it does, people who used to benefit usually choose to keep buying the imports and luxury goods they became used to, and to instead fire or stop helping their poor servants.

      So in the long run the end of inflation and the associated suffering is an economic purge that should help to build a saner, more just economy and society. But rich people's egotism amplifies the suffering.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    48. Re:Exciting by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      I hate to tell you but Nazi Germany's worst battles were not againt the US, they were against the Russians. I'm sure that most Nazi's at the time would have loved to be on the western front and not the eastern.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    49. Re:Exciting by jmccay · · Score: 1

      You are overlooking one small problem. Germany overtook most of Europe! If America didn't enter the war, Britian would have lost.
      The world revolves around America because America is the only super-power in the world right now. In the future, it will be someone else. Now off to watch the superbowl...Pats Rule!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    50. Re:Exciting by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I will expand on the ACs comment. You are taking that sentence out of context. If you call the fact that Germany walked all over France et. al. a challenge to German superiority, then you have a weak idea on what a challenge really is. Without America, Europe would be speaking German, and more Jews would have been killed.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    51. Re:Exciting by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Please read my comment above.

      Before the US entered WWII it had a very poor military. It was once the drum roll started that the US military became a real force. This can be seen by visiting any Army base in the US, almost all the buildings you see, including the Pentagon, were built right before the US entered WWII.

      Also for the defence of other European nation, the reason most fell to Germany was becouse the thinking after WWI was that it was "The war to end all wars" and that peace will follow. So nations didn't really see a need for a large build up of arms.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    52. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At any rate the USA saved the UK and Western Europe for several decades - nobody can take that away from them.

      Yeah, and Marechal Petain was a very successful and admired military commander in World War I...

      ... only to surrender and fall in the arms of Hitler in Word War II.

    53. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Um, actually no. If you had any knowledge of world economics, you would know that the world DOES currently revolve around the United States (and its economy).

      Ridiculous. USA was 50% GDP of the world at the end of WWII. It is nowadays 22%. This means 78% of the World Economy is no longer American. EU-25 economy is as big as US for starters. Asia (China, India, Korea, ...) is coming big, and US %-age of world GDP will shrink again. It's time to adjust your mind.

    54. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are overlooking one small problem. Germany overtook most of Europe! If America didn't enter the war, Britian would have lost.

      No. You forgot a small country called Russia. Alone it would have been able to defeat Germany.

      The world revolves around America because America is the only super-power in the world right now. In the future, it will be someone else

      It no longer revolves around US. US is like the louder, bully, kid of the class. He makes lots of noise, but he is no really that important. He does think he is, though.

      Now off to watch the superbowl...Pats Rule!

      I never watched a game of American football in my all life. Funny...

    55. Re:Exciting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The point is, Germany went largely unchallenged for 5 years before the US got involved. Same thing with Japan.

      Sounds like you took a history of WW2 class but only looked at the pretty pictures:

      The US (and other Western gov'ts) had an Oil embargo on Japan. Their options were, run out of Oil or Seize the fields (and hold them).

      So they planned and executed quite the first strike, that COULD have been very crippling, but, well... wasn't.

      Then Mr. H. (Crazy McCrazy) decided to declare war on the US.

      Britian would not have Fallen... because of Russia. Once Germany invaded Russia, it was over. Most Generals new it... but complaints weren't taken well.

      Try to realize that every nation teaches their young the history that they want them to remember.

      And that the US didn't give a crap about anyone else in 1941, and they didn't decide to join the fight. They were willing to sit back and watch (As a whole, granted some individuals wanted to get involved)

    56. Re:Exciting by spasm · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the vaguaries of slashdot - write a carefully thought out response to something, it sinks without a trace. Write a flippant, 90% flamebait comment while drunk and someone will click 'insightful'. And it'll be the start of a 20+ message thread arguing about WWII.. {grin}

    57. Re:Exciting by aminorex · · Score: 1

      No, hatred is usually fueled by injustice.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    58. Re:Exciting by Paul123 · · Score: 1

      The economy should provide for the benefit of its citizens, not just benefit insiders or be a pawn to foreign policy. Moderate trade can keep labor and capitol honest and provide for the common good. What we have now is not moderate and is making us more like other countries, where the average citizen counts for nothing. (Comparatively, we still do a good job of running an honest economy and that is why so many people want to live here.) I don't see any politicians taking a stand against this selling out of the middle class. They seem to think that the only way to develop the world economy is "free trade" rigged in favor of capitol. Another way would be to encourage democracy, reducing corruption, and cooling the flame of ethnic hatreds. Just encourage basic good government. Many countries are rich in resources but their people live miserably.

    59. Re:Exciting by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If you wish to call living on 2000usd for two years rich...that's ok. My real point was that NAFTA did a lot to ruin the country. The gov't was forced to privatize many of their industries, the railroad being my favorite example. The trains here were very old but in very good condition, and to me, very luxurious(if you rented a sleeper) and also very cheap. It was a wonderful way to travel. All that is gone now, due to NAFTA. The train is virtually unusable. I'm not sure if they even use it for freight anymoer. Another thing is daylight savings time. It is absolutely ridiculous to have such a thing south of the Tropic of Cancer. Daylight doesn't vary that much. But it appears that they have to keep their clocks syncronized with the americans, so now they have it. These are the simplest of examples. I'm sure there are many more.

      --
      What?
    60. Re:Exciting by randyflood · · Score: 1
      This is exactly the problem w/ free trade. Conservatives want it for obvious reasons and progressives want it since they mistakenly believe it will bring up the standards of living in the target countries. Although it does (bring up the std of living), it does so through achieving equilibrium. The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group. To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case. In the absence of this plan, the only people who benefit from free trade are the really rich as they income gap increases.



      You do not understand the how Free Trade works. Bascially, Free Trade benefits both contries. It does not bring down the richer contry as you have suggested.



      Let me explain how it works. Highly industrialized countries like the US are good at innovating. We are good at making new products. We are great at high tech. But once we have products to the point of mass-producing them, we are not so great. Our society is past the point of being able to provide cheap labor that can compete with 3rd world countries. But, even though some manufacturing jobs go to Mexico, say for example, Mexico's economy improves, and their middle class improves. As that occures, their demand for our products improves. Also, we make more profit on our products because they cost us less to produce. Overall, both countries benefit. Economically, at least.



      Now, you can make a case that this does not really address human rights concerns. And you would be right about that. What about child factory workers and issues like that? What about the enviornment? What aboout mad cow disease? These issues concern me. But, I thinnk Free Trade is still a GOOD IDEA (TM). These other issues have to be worked out via whatever treaties/UN stuff/wars/etc we can use to work them out.

      Randy

      --
      Randy.Flood@RHCE2B.COM
    61. Re:Exciting by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Having two home builders in the family, I have to agree with the efficient home assertion. Home requirements nationwide not only force use of efficent HVAC equipment, but even water savers (those toilets that don't use much water, shower heads, etc...), and more.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    62. Re:Exciting by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, where are you from? In the Houston area, the mass transit system is horrible and not getting better any time soon. Also, this is the second largest city in the US in land area, 4th largest in population. It's VERY spread out. It's easy to say "work close to home" but as a contract programmer, am I to pick up the kids and buy a different house every time my contracts expire? Or should I simply say "I'll take a lower paying job and decrease my children's standard of living, while the higher paying job is still available?"

      My point is you're not going to get people to voluntarily decrease their standard of living. People with three kids in a 4 bedroom house aren't going to up and say "we should all share bedrooms now, and we won't need that gameroom anymore" when they feel like they've earned it.

      Better to spend money making the house more efficient i.e. r10 windows, r30 insulation, energy efficient appliances. All of this puts people to work as well, so you're helping the economy at the same time.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    63. Re:Exciting by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are talking about compeating against a society which it is impossible to compeate against. No one can afford to live in the US for a few dollars a day, not unless the economy of the US drops to the level of present day India. That sucking sound you hear is not just programming jobs leaving the US, but every bloody, decent paying, white or blue collar job. This process will continue until hundreds of people have to ride to work on the roof of an Amtrak, and the streets of downtown USA are filled with squaller (sp). We cannot compete against Chinese sweat shops, where the workers live in the factory, and trade bunks as shifts clock in and out. We have build up a certain standard of living in the US, which the corporations are all too ready to give away. We're not just fighting for our jobs, we're fighting for our standard of living, our fucking lives.

    64. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, where are you from? In the Houston area, the mass transit system is horrible and not getting better any time soon. Also, this is the second largest city in the US in land area, 4th largest in population. It's VERY spread out

      Look, I'm not blaming you in particular. I commute by car as well because I don't have a choice. But as a society, we will have to change, not for warm-and-fuzzy feelings, but because of simple economic pressures.

      Or should I simply say "I'll take a lower paying job and decrease my children's standard of living, while the higher paying job is still available?"

      Higher paying jobs don't necessarily translate into a higher standard of living, or even higher disposable income. So, yes, you might.

      People with three kids in a 4 bedroom house aren't going to up and say "we should all share bedrooms now, and we won't need that gameroom anymore" when they feel like they've earned it.

      Well, historically, wages and living standards haven't always gone up. Post-war, we have come to expect it, but there is no reason that it should continue indefinitely.

      When your wages are cut in half because you are competing against outsourcing to Indian contract programmers, maybe that four bedroom house and two car lifestyle just won't be affordable anymore. Maybe once gas prices double (again) because of increased demand from India and China, you'll think twice about buying that gas guzzler. Maybe you'll vote for people who give you decent public transportation and housing densities. Maybe you'll move to communities where you only need one car.

      Better to spend money making the house more efficient i.e. r10 windows, r30 insulation, energy efficient appliances. All of this puts people to work as well, so you're helping the economy at the same time.

      Just consuming more stuff doesn't help the economy or create jobs. In fact, if anything, it seems to be the opposite. It looks to me like societies with smaller dwellings fill them with more labor-intensive goods (hand-made furniture, clever designs, etc.). Big houses consume lots of raw materials but don't require much labor or skill to build or furnish compared to smaller dwellings.

    65. Re:Exciting by chrisbord · · Score: 1

      And to be blunt: India is a far safer nation than the USA. Let's evaluate the most likely risk to occur, rather than the most unlikely. After all, the USA is the world's biggest and most likely target for nuclear, chemical and biological attack according to US politicians.

      I never heard any politician with authority state we were MOST likely target, though that may be true. I do seem to recall India and Pakistan a few years ago coming to the brink of nuclear war though. There were two assasination attempts against Musharraf a couple of weeks ago, too. If that were to happen, al Qaeda would essentially run a country with nuclear weapons and it is hard to say who would 'get it' first. I know if that happened there would be a panic in this country (USA) to install radioactivity detectors along every *inch* of the border.

    66. Re:Exciting by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I think maybe you misunderstand me. I'm not trying to be abbrasive at all. There are a couple of points I tried to make in my comment. One is that as we roll forward, everything is becoming more efficient. Vehicles, homes, water use, etc... People are also becoming more educated about conservation. Not everyone applies practices like turning off the water while brushing their teeth, but more and more do.

      You're right that higher paying jobs do not translate to a higher standard of living. But in the US, a higher net pay (after deducting costs of transportation to work, lunch, etc...) in any urban area do mean a higher standard of living. As a matter of fact, the only example of a pay cut I can think of that wouldn't generally translate to a lower standard of living would be a telecommuting gig. There are sacrifices people will easily make i.e. taking the time to separate garbage for recycling, compost piles, fewer trips to the store to save gas, etc... without thinking too much of it. There are other sacrifices i.e. fit 5 people into a Ford Focus instead of a Suburban to save gas, make kids share a room when they used to have their own, that people will be hard pressed to switch to unless forced (loss of job, loss of industry).

      As far as the economy itself goes, the President and Congress have a tough job. Both trickle-down and trickle-up economics have their problems, but both seem to work a bit in boosting a lagging economy. Either put the money in people's hands so they'll spend some of it, or put it in companies hands so they'll hire more people. Either way, it's all very cyclical, and we're on the downward side of the boom we saw that ended in 1999. I don't fear all programming jobs (I'm a programmer) heading offshore... as a matter of fact, the pulse of hiring managers in this industry seem to think at most it will outsource about 15%. What we're not getting anymore is the ridiculous sums of the late nineties (which I was guilty of to an extent), and the rate for programmers is levelling off a bit. None of that will stop me from working towards the highest rate I can possibly get, but it does ease the pain a bit of the $25k/year I've lost in the last 3 years.

      None of that keeps me from wanting a bigger house, maybe a larger piece of land, more for my family. I have a question though... how could you fill a smaller house with more furniture? And bigger houses require much more labor, as well as the idea that they tend to have more labor intensive improvements... such as tile floors rather than linoleum, granite counters rather than formica, custom cabinets rather than off the shelf cabinetry, etc... All of which require more labor and keep more people in work.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    67. Re:Exciting by ajagci · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of points I tried to make in my comment. One is that as we roll forward, everything is becoming more efficient. Vehicles, homes, water use, etc... People are also becoming more educated about conservation. Not everyone applies practices like turning off the water while brushing their teeth, but more and more do.

      But even the more educated and more environmentally conscious consumers in the US consume many times the world average. We couldn't scale up world consumption even to the levels of, say, an environmental nut living in Berkeley.

      But in the US, a higher net pay (after deducting costs of transportation to work, lunch, etc...) in any urban area do mean a higher standard of living.

      If you measure "standard of living" primarily in terms of "goods and services you can purchase".

      As far as the economy itself goes, the President and Congress have a tough job. Both trickle-down and trickle-up economics have their problems, but both seem to work a bit in boosting a lagging economy. Either put the money in people's hands so they'll spend some of it, or put it in companies hands so they'll hire more people. Either way, it's all very cyclical, and we're on the downward side of the boom we saw that ended in 1999.

      I think you are having a very short-term perspective. Do you really think that China and India are going to be content with continuing to do low-wage manufacturing so that we can buy T-shirts and computers really cheaply? If they aren't going to do sweat shop labor anymore, who is? And do you really think they are going to curb their consumption of energy and raw materials to make sure that the US can continue to get them cheaply? Prices will go up steeply, both on manufacturing and on raw materials, as nations like India and China modernize. Maybe we can find another generation of people to work for us for nothing in Russia and Africa, but then we have pretty much used up all the continents.

      I have a question though... how could you fill a smaller house with more furniture?

      You don't. You fill it with more expensive, more customized furniture requiring more manual labor and craftsmanship to design. In fact, ideally, you have the furniture custom crafted for your specific needs.

      And bigger houses require much more labor,

      No, sorry, they really don't.

      as well as the idea that they tend to have more labor intensive improvements... such as tile floors rather than linoleum, granite counters rather than formica, custom cabinets rather than off the shelf cabinetry, etc... All of which require more labor and keep more people in work.

      Bigger houses require less of all of that. In a big house, you can afford to buy pre-fab components: pre-fab kitchen cabinets, pre-cut countertops, etc. because, hey, if you lose a couple of feet here and there, it doesn't matter. In a small house, everything has to fit, and that means that things often need to be custom designed and built.

      I've been through this a couple of times. With a big place, I could just drive a pickup truck down to some big appliance or furniture store and pick up mass-produced items. I knew they'd fit in somewhere. With a small place, I needed to call in expert designers and carpenters. Overall, the small place was still more affordable, but it also actually generated far more jobs, and jobs of the desirable variety, and ended up being overall nicer anyway: better location, more upscale look, etc. It's a tradeoff well-worth considering: with homes, bigger is not at all better.

  4. India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I fear that OSS is soon going to force all programming jobs to move to India. Since OSS companies typically make far less profit than real commercial software companies do, they cannot afford to hire decent programmers. So they'll outsource to India, for 10 dollars an hour. Furthermore, by using underhanded tactics like "borrowing" Unix code, they'll beat their commercial competitors -- and the commercial companies will either be forced to open source, or go out of business. I'm not trying to say that OSS is bad, or it should be banned, but some kind of regulation should be put in place to ensure that the majority of software in use is still good old fashioned commercial software.

    1. Re:India and Open Source by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2, Funny

      There oughtta be a law!

      To stop bad laws.

      An antilaw if you will.

      They will come in card form.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    2. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer it in pog form.

    3. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was called the Tenth Amendment. Didn't work.

    4. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away Darl, you're not wanted here.

    5. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is wrong with you? Regulation to ensure the majority of software is commercial? Do you realize what you are saying?

      ITS CALLED NATIONAL SOCIALISM PAL, Nazism, to the ignoramuses out there like you.

      The underlying reason that jobs shift to India is because #1 - Western Government Allows It, and #2 - India's Government Allows Exploitation.

      As long as CEO's of IT companies bring home $20 million paychecks, they can afford to pay people a decent living here.

    6. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my opinion, it would be more productive to have the laws come in card form, and then provide counterspell cards to the American people.

      On the other hand, we'd have to explain the stack rules to Joe Sixpack... or maybe we could just use the rules from before Sixth Edition.

      After we pass out counterspells, maybe we could pass out Shocks, so we can stop the Bush administration from burning the constitution in the name of banning Terror. Oh wait, they just reprinted Terror in Mirrodin. Those unpatriotic bastards!

    7. Re:India and Open Source by magores · · Score: 1

      Darl McBride posting as AC?

    8. Re:India and Open Source by ajagci · · Score: 1

      I fear that OSS is soon going to force all programming jobs to move to India

      Quite to the contrary: because OSS developers actually are OSS users and because OSS users are in the US, OSS keeps programming jobs in the US; they simply aren't called "programming jobs".

      Furthermore, by using underhanded tactics like "borrowing" Unix code, they'll beat their commercial competitors -- and the commercial companies will either be forced to open source, or go out of business.

      Yes, that's what usually happens when a better technology comes along that lowers the cost of production--the factories and corporations that use the old processes become uncompetitive. OSS beats what you call "commercial" software development because it's better and cheaper. Now, we only have to wait for the market to take care of the dinosaurs. As it should be.

    9. Re:India and Open Source by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      please don't feed the troll... he is so obviously got shit for brains and won't be capable of grasping any kind of business model which isn't a copy of microsofts

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    10. Re:India and Open Source by gareth6889 · · Score: 1

      ???

      isnt it a joke??

    11. Re:India and Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like some people have no sense of humur.

  5. Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you ever wondered why all the IT jobs are being outsourced to India? Really, I find it hard to believe why people question this growing trend. Is it not obvious?

    Indians are by nature better programmers. For one, they never have to deal with type casting erros -- they never forget to caste!

    1. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, better, who would want to 'continue' to work with people who eat "RARE" beef that still has blood in the core?
      Think twice, burger flippers!

    2. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians are by nature better programmers. For one, they never have to deal with type casting erros -- they never forget to caste!
      Westerners are by nature better programmers. For one, they know how make something else(computer) "slave" for them

    3. Re:Outsourcing to India? by andalay · · Score: 1

      this should be modded up more, funny as hell!

    4. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot needs a sort of null-point moderation that would not change the Score, but would add a "(Ba-dum CHING!)" tag to the post.

      This would be used for jokes that are funny, but in that painful groaning sort of way that you can't decide if it's a good thing or a bad thing.

      -- Super ugly ultraman

    5. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, rare beef has absolutely no blood in it, it is in fact myoglobin. Of course, you would know that having researched the topic before spouting nonsense.

    6. Re:Outsourcing to India? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Are you bashing Hinduism?

      Though it still made me laugh. Can't help it.

    7. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better programmers ?????
      have you ever seen an indian programmer???
      I have not seen a more stupid creature than an indian. But we like them, why??
      They greatly improve job security by keeping us very busy fixing bugs they make by nature !!!!
      Corporations like them because they make good imitation of work and they are CHEAP !!!

    8. Re:Outsourcing to India? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Bah. If they used a real language (read: not Java), they wouldn't need to cast! Java takes the dubious honor of being one of the few statically-typed languages that are highly prone to runtime-type errors. Congratulations Java: you suck!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The western world was first to abolish slavery. Try thinking sometime.

    10. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SO? The "Western World" also committed one of the biggest crimes against humanity, and continues to do so.
      How many black computer software engineers or developers do you know? In all my decades in high tech, I've only ever met two. Amazing, isn't it?

    11. Re:Outsourcing to India? by PudriK · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly think this is because all computer companies and IT companies are racist? The world it a bit more complex than that. I would think a combination of the following factors would come into play: Blacks still represent a large portion of the poor urban population, a problem which itself is due to many factors of which racism is only part. Until very recently most lower-income people usually did not have access to computers, and therefore their children were unlikely to have grown up using them. Since black people tend to congregate, it may be that within a given setting not enough have had a mutual interest in computers for a large number to pursue that course over others. In my personal experience, of several black kids I new in high school, all from upper-middle-class families and very intelligent, some very good with computers, none of them wanted to be computer guys. Many wanted to be doctors, and I think the others studied english or other liberal arts degrees.

    12. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever seen an indian programmer???

      LOL...dude u working in Alaska?

      They greatly improve job security by keeping us very busy fixing bugs they make by nature !!!!

      why not? u interested in washing dishes at ur local rest? Thanks to all prgmrs who create bugs! BUGS = more coding positions u morron!

    13. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder all the jobs are fleeing to India/China. If you only pulled your head out of your ass and realized that there is much more to India, or for that matter any other country, than casteism and/or other localized socio-cultural oddities, you could better adapt to the situation and maybe lend a helping hand to a totally clueless administration.

      In any case, most of the arguments I have seen against offshoring seem to come from people who wante the cake and eat it too. The US is the one that started the whole globalization and free market concept, made a ton of money for quite some time being the leaders due to a very well established infrastructure, and now that some other nations are catching up, you dont like it. How does that work?

      IMO capitalism is one chaotic s.o.b. It can help you make a lot of money quickly or make you loose a lot of it quickly. It is the governement's duty to support capitalist economic policies so that their populace can reap its benefits. At the same time its the government's responsibility to have socialist (for lack of a better word) people policies to shield the populace (to the extent it is possible) from the negative effects of a capitalist market. If your govenrment is full of incompetent jokers, its not a developing country's fault.

      Just my $0.2.

    14. Re:Outsourcing to India? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I've met about fifty in my few years in St. Louis. Were you thinking of Maine perhaps?

    15. Re:Outsourcing to India? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Everybody needs to knock off the racist shit. It's very ugly.

    16. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, hush. I work with several Indian programmers. One is very good, one is very bad (actually, he was just fired), and one's about typical for being right out of school (which she is). The whole all-Indian-programmers-are-$FOO thing needs to stop.

      [sigh... yes, I'm feeding the troll...]

    17. Re:Outsourcing to India? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      You're so full of it. The "Eastern World" has committed the same crimes. Slavery was common throughout history. It still goes on in Africa.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    18. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, racism? Most of the East is way more racist than the West.

    19. Re:Outsourcing to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, US was second to last, only Russia was later.

  6. Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...if the jobs can go to India, it would make sense that the workers can too.

    Someone told someone whose job was outsourced to "think outside the box", and look what happened. ;)

    1. Re:Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by Aspasia13 · · Score: 1

      Its easier to live outsize the box when its made of cardboard and you're living in it.

    2. Re:Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by nyseal · · Score: 1

      At least I'll finally get to talk to someone who speaks English when I need tech support.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    3. Re:Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I'll finally get to talk to someone who speaks English when I need tech support.

      Yes you'll get that in India, pretty much everyone there speaks English and most of them much better than the majority of Americans. (For the record, yes I realise there are educated Americans, but good luck finding one).

    4. Re:Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, because the number of homeless people in America is just skyrocketing... er....

    5. Re:Isn't this what "mobile workforce" means? ;) by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, they speak English, and many of them have excellent vocabulary and grammar...but they have an ungodly thick accent to American ears.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  7. Suprised. by bagel2ooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems this would be something that would have been up and coming. With so many tech jobs being outsourced to India. Hopefully their booming economy will help give us a run for our money. Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition. At least I hope it will be friendlier and with at least as comparable results as the technology boosts during WWII and The Cold War. :)

    --
    ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
    1. Re:Suprised. by Galvatron · · Score: 0
      Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition.

      And what are you basing this on? The 90's were one of the most explosive decades in American history for economic growth. Competition may be good for government programs like space flight, but I don't think the presence or lack of other superpowers has anything to do with how fast the economy grows (indeed, it just seems to fuel paranoid protectionist rhetoric, such as the anti-Japanese sentiment of the 80's)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:Suprised. by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      --
      Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition.
      --

      The US has a habit of giving up entire industries--PERMANENTLY.

      How many VCRs are made in the US?

      How many TV sets?

    3. Re:Suprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition.

      Like with the car industry? Camera industry?

    4. Re:Suprised. by Serveert · · Score: 1

      Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition.

      Indeed. Let's compete shall we. First we'll make sure that running water is hard to come by. Then we'll remove most traffic lights. Then we'll get rid of the FDA, USDA and EPA. Then, to really compete, we'll need to get rid of the minimum wage law.

      --
      2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    5. Re:Suprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Historically good things seem to happen when we have competition."

      Like with the car industry? Camera industry?


      Yes. If you don't consider the increasing quality and affordability of products to be a good thing then I guess there's not much I can say to convince you, but yes for most of us the things that happened in those industries are good.

      You can buy an American car if you want to. The fact that few people want to is hardly an inditement of the alternatives.

  8. India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Not being racist, but I can't be in close proximity to a billion people eating curry all day long. It's tough enough being in an office with a few of them.

    Curry, much like garlic, comes out of the pores. It's why some people think that Indian people smell. It's not that they smell, it's just that they eat a lot of curry. Italian people who eat a lot of garlic also "smell".

    1. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right!
      Over here, in the US, I have to work with people who go home to have a 'quickie' with their gay spouses and come to work without taking a shower!

      Better garlic smell than 'you know what'!!

    2. Re:India is not for Me by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whatever you say, Mr. Eau de Rancid Big Mac.

      KFG

    3. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curry that reeks out of one's pores, is one of the nastiest stenches known to man. Indian people aren't aware of it because they are around it from birth.

      But trust me, it offends a lot of non-indians. Where I work at, when an Indian invites people out for Indian food, we all get very creative in making excuses. No one wants to smell like an Indian.

    4. Re:India is not for Me by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Okie Doke Kentucky Fried Goat.

      (just the first thing I thought of and I don't eat at McRancid's either :-)

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    5. Re:India is not for Me by kfg · · Score: 1

      You should google on KFG. Really.

      KFG

    6. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wish to be facetious but I eat curry all day long but don't stink - I have been told that it is a hindu religious thing of not bathing for 7-8 days. That is why some days stink more than others.

    7. Re:India is not for Me by macjohn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OK, what I want to know is if Englishmen and Frenchmen both stink, how come Canadians smell OK? Must neutralize somehow.

      --
      --Hi. I'm in Portland and it's raining. This appears to be a permanent condition.
    8. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have no choice. curry is coming. it will devour you. i cannot stand the horrble smell of non vegetarian items. you eat animals. i eat vegetablea man.... think about it. you kill animals. how sinful. no respect for life.

    9. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should google on these nuts. Really.

      NUTS.

    10. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you kill animals. how sinful. no respect for life.

      I know. All those animals in the wild are oh so sinful.

      If Meat didn't taste good, no one would kill the poor suckers.

    11. Re:India is not for Me by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Curry, much like garlic, comes out of the pores.
      There's a spice called fenugreek which is in english style curry powder and in a few different curries - it has a strong flavour and a strong smell. If you eat a lot of fenugreek the smell comes out through your skin for a few days - the usual curry won't do it, but if you grow it as sprouts you can eat a lot of the stuff because the flavour is milder (it tastes really good in a sandwich). It's a bit embarrassing smelling precisely like Keens Curry Powder for a couple of days, it's in your skin so it won't wash off.

      in close proximity to a billion people eating curry all day long
      Beats the smell of a grease trap behind KFC any day. If people can get used to living near hot springs in a few days, then different cooking smells shouldn't be a problem.
    12. Re:India is not for Me by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Okie Doke Kentucky Fried Goat.
      One name for it is "Unlucky Fried Kitten" after an urban myth.
    13. Re:India is not for Me by avyakrta · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah sure, feel free to starve and smell nice in Bush country :)

      --
      Truth prevails.......
    14. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carrots scream.

    15. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats the smell of a grease trap behind KFC any day.

      No it's not.

      Most people do not live near a KFC. If they did, they have the option of moving elsewhere.

      When you live in India you are going to be around curry-eating Indian people. A billion of them. There is no place to hide from them.

      When you go to the office, the kitchen or cafeteria will be cooking it up. The people will be dispensing it slowly from their pores. The curry stench from the bathrooms will be seeping into the office.

      In short, India is not a place for people who do not want to be around stinking people.

    16. Re:India is not for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Indian friend that I knew from school. He was not fresh of the boat like most of the other CS students from India, in fact he was raised in the US most of his life and was "Americanized". He said that he ate the same foods that they eat the only difference was he would take a shower afterwards and put on new clothes. He also explained that he would open up the windows and turn on the ventillation on the stove when he cooked.
      I have been through the same situation, as a ACM C++ tutor at school I had to tutor some of them and I seriously had to leave the room to get fresh air since the smell was so strong. I was truly embarrassed for my rude behaviour but it could not be helped. Right now I am doing my master in C.S. and my class is 90% Indian. I feel like I moved to Mumbai, it almost seems that they are more like grown programmers than individuals who decide to choose their degree by their own will.

    17. Re:India is not for Me by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I did. Kentucky Financial Group? Interesting that the graphics on the homepage are pyramid shaped... doesn't inspire confidence in a financial context. ;-)

    18. Re:India is not for Me by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Err? I don't see anything particularly enlightening. Care to expand the search a bit?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
  9. doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not buying this story. People aren't leaving high paid jobs in the US to go work for peanuts in India. I'd rather work at Quiznos.

    1. Re:doubt it by Nept · · Score: 1

      Quiznos (like Starbucks) only thrives because of the corporate-type jobs that exist here. As the jobs decrease, chains like this will also begin to decrease.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    2. Re:doubt it by Doomdark · · Score: 4, Informative
      People aren't leaving high paid jobs in the US to go work for peanuts in India. I'd rather work at Quiznos.

      Were you by any chance raised by wolves?

      You know, what they get paid in India is relatively speaking most likely very nice amount? Purchasing parity is nice; one can live like a king there... so in some ways they'll be better off there. One can not really afford servants with programmer salary in USA; but can most definitely do that in India. It's not like they go there to starve; quite the opposite. It's even possible that the salaries are getting closer to those of, say, southern Europe ones; and trend is likely to continue. In couple of years high quartile of programmers in India earn more than low quartile in, say, mid-west.

      Furthermore, the article did mention that it may be considered a good career move; working in India helps in managing teams in India, even if one works in USA (assuming there'll be managing jobs remaining in USA). So, it can also be thought of as sort of extreme internship. :-)

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    3. Re:doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post was of course copied from an older slashdot post. I'm too lazy to look, but mod this guy down appropiately.

    4. Re:doubt it by dj245 · · Score: 1
      I'm a college student on a limited budget. As far as I know, there is about one Quiznos in the state of Maine. But I eat there every time I go through that town, because their subs taste a whole lot better than subway's, or Tim Hortons. I don't know of any stereotype of quiznos being equated to expensive corporate types; I thought their prices were reasonable compared to other sub places.

      Perhaps you meant Kinkos?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:doubt it by radixvir · · Score: 1

      ya really who can afford a $10 sub. they opened one nearby me and i dont know why. its good food but college students cant afford eating there often

    6. Re:doubt it by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Yeah....working for peanuts in India would suck, especially when you get trampled by an elephan stampede on payday

    7. Re:doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmm....toasted.

    8. Re:doubt it by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

      --
      C|N>K
    9. Re:doubt it by Nept · · Score: 1

      well, that's maine. here in CA, there's practically one on every street corner in the white-collar/downtown environs of most cities.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    10. Re:doubt it by nyseal · · Score: 1

      If the salaries were equal to the US then there would be no reason to outsource.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    11. Re:doubt it by dj245 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "So, it can also be thought of as sort of extreme internship. :-)"

      Next on CBS Reality Thusday: Extreme Internships- India.
      Watch Jack edge out Ganaraj with his sharp mastery of the english language and superior problem-solving skills. Will Sharon become the next IT manager, or will Mahakanta beat her to it with her better memorization skills?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    12. Re:doubt it by MSBob · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Lower purchasing parity blah, blah... Live lika a king in country X blah, blah... everything including a house costs under a thousand greenbacks blah, blah...

      Where the fuck do you guys get those stories from? I happen to have been born in a pretty inexpensive country (Eastern Europe). Yes some things are cheaper over there BUT my salary back home would have been an equivalent of $16,000US. A three bedroom house there costs $150,000. A new car costs $25,000. A meal in a restaurant runs up around $30. Yeah. so it's cheaper than the US. By about 20%. Except salaries (even for programmers) are about 70% lower. Stop daydreaming you are not going to live a lavish life if you move to an Indian IT sweatshop to be a code monkey for da man. However many rupees they'll pay you is definitely not going to make your life more comfortable than an average American can afford. There is a reason why US has the highest PER CAPITA Gross Domestic Product in the world.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    13. Re:doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A simplistic solution to all of this outsourcing madness is to require that American companies pay minimum wage to workers in outrsourced positions overseas.

      This is a meet-in-the-middle solution since it forces American companies to pay more (and avoid overly exploiting foreign workers), and at the same time helps establish that at least workers in the US can still work at minimum wage.

      Ultimately, it increases the costs of outsourcing so that it doesn't make it the most attractive solution in every cost cutting case. And even if companies were still to outsource, it would dramatically increase the distribution of wealth to the foreigh workers -- which is one of the prime arguments of progressives. Companies should also benefit because typically you will get the best and brightest with such a difference in pay scale in those foreign countries. And even if foreign companies should choose to compete it will "force" them to match salary wise or lose the best and brightest -- thus alot of competitive advantages.

      I'm sure that there are lot of smarter people out there who can come up with better solutions, but at least this is a start instead of all the whining on slashdot.

    14. Re:doubt it by metamatic · · Score: 1
      There is a reason why US has the highest PER CAPITA Gross Domestic Product in the world.

      I've a hunch it's something to do with Americans working more hours per year than any other country in the world.
      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    15. Re:doubt it by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      Equality using currency exchange rate tells little about local purchasing power (parity) of monetary amounts. So, in case of India MANY things are cheaper, not just workers (which is indicated by lower "absolute" salaries); so relatively speaking your salaries goes much farther. Obviously this mostly relates to domestic products; for buying iPods it has less effect. In that sense salaries will approach _relative_ US salaries much quicker; depending on how one calculates purchasing power for comparisons.

      So it's basically possible for both salaries to be globally-speaking lower (just use raw currency exchange rates), to make outsourcing look more attractive, AND for that difference to be much lesser from employee's perspective (to make working in India a viable option).

      Also note that there is already big difference in salaries inside USA. Some companies are "outsourcing" from California and New York to cheaper states. Thus, there is no single US salary rate either; which means that India (et al) will reach salary rates of, say, Alabama IT workers much sooner than those of Massachusetts.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    16. Re:doubt it by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      And you think comparing an eastern european country (which is industrialized nation, more expensive housing due to historical restrictions etc) to India is fair? That's idiotic, care-free knee-jerk comment; based partially on misreading exactly what I said.


      For some things things can be directly compared, sure; imports can not be much cheaper (except for medicines that are overpriced in US), but labour based products invariably ARE cheaper.


      And to highest per capita GDP; strictly speaking that's not true. Go check your statistics. There are couple of countries higher; mostly oil-rich ones. Plus
      more importantly, it all depends on current
      US$ exchange rate. Now that dollar is coming down, except USA to "drop" down few notches next time you read the charts. But that just points the fallacy of comparing nominal salaries between countries; realistically change is hardly equivalent to what statistics tell.


      And finally for whatever it's worth; the idea of "living like a king" is based on what I was told by an indian co-worker, who I would assume knows situation much better than you or I; esp. since he is rather likely to move back there in future.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    17. Re:doubt it by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Testify, brother! I'm from Ireland where the cost of living is way higher than the US and salaries are about 30% lower. No fucking way I'm leaving the US. I miss certain things about the old sod, friends and family, but I do not miss my lower standard of living.

    18. Re:doubt it by MSBob · · Score: 1
      Strictly speaking the US HAS the highest per capita GDP. You check your facts. There are no oil rich countries that have higher per capita GDP than US even when PPP is taken into account. You're probably thinking about the principality of Brunei but even they have a per capita GDP lower than the US. Luxemburg comes close but it got eclipsed by the US over the last few years.

      Your Indian friend will of course tell you all kinds of tales about the affluence in his country because he sees it through rose tinted glasses. But even if we take his story about servants as true, I'd rather have clean running water and 24/7 electricity (let the California jokes roll) than a stable of servants to pedal on my dynamo backup generator :-)

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    19. Re:doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you silly old fart, you can't compare eastern europe to india.
      things are more affordable in india.
      i know because i am indian.
      just because you are jaded by the industry as a whole and you're past your sell-by date and no one wants to hire you and you have a high opinion of yourself which is probably unjustified by the way you carry on, does not entitle you to make whinging-feel-sorry-for-yourself-blanket statements.

      now go fix my toilet.

    20. Re:doubt it by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      Hmmh. Need to find the GDP charts again, then... I was thinking of Brunei, some of smaller gulf countries as well as Norway, although shouldn't have missed Luxembourg (didn't think it was _that_ high, although know they have banking and industry... and immaculate location in heart of Europe).
      [I'd still be curious to see how dollar's current weakness will reflect rankings for this year. I still remember time when my home country was nominally on par with US, due to grossly overpriced currency (decade before euro)]

      But back to India; my main point was just that comparing hard currency exchanged salaries won't give the whole picture. Since labour is cheap, some things are so much cheaper that one can afford things there not possible here; having your own gardener, babysitter, cardriver etc. etc. Same thing as what happens in many african countries. But I certainly agree that infrastructure problems are big, and that from most POVs IT salaries are not match for US ones. You just won't be able to buy as many iPods there. And still I maintain that just comparing "hey, code monkeys only earn 1/5 of what we earn here" is over-simplifying things, to the degree it's just plain wrong. Difference is not really 1-to-5, even if raw comparison would indicate this is the case (or whatever ratio is claimed; 1-to-5 is just one I've heard).

      One way to improve comparison is to consider purchasing parity; yet another (related to "live like a king") is relative IT salaries compared to other people's salaries. In US, I earn at most about twice as much as most blue-collar workers; perhaps 4x as much as burger flippers, and not that much more than other college educated workers. My understanding is that in India ratio is growing much higher. And why should this matter? Since this is what makes service products (and labour-intensive things like construction) much much cheaper; and is not usually well measured by various living cost indexes (AFAIK; services are included but underpresented).

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  10. Yes, VERY TRUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of my colleagues are now wanting to goto India. At this rate, I will miss my friends pretty soon! *sigh*

  11. Re:the burning question is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe Northern India, where its not so hot;
    but Southern India... where it gets up to 45'C...

    My brain, like any normal supercomputer, functions best at low temperature.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  12. Myth busting by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Good to see that particular myth busted. The reality seems to be that India is simply embracing software development, and given the lower cost of living over there, are making huge gains in that sector - in the end software is just bits, and it's very easy to ship them anywhere in the world.

    If you don't fancy working in India, just pick somewhere else with a lower cost of living than the US, and set up shop there. You could try New Zealand or Australia - both fairly western countries with a notably lower cost of living (depending on where you go) than the US. Still not as low as India, but then it would provide less of a language barrier (depending on exactly how uninterpretable you consider the austrialian accent), which many here claim is a significant problem with Indian outsourcing.

    So, why not set up your own outsourcing company?

    Jedidiah

    1. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This search of living (depening to ector - iHT and Finan accent), when top your own outsourcing. So, was true of the Up your own opportunities. Talent has tradia, just pick still not as low are adding the Ing on exactly how Zealaim is a sighly qualified talian the globally.

      Today, the same is head are adding the end softwaress report that many qualificant problem Indian outsourch of bettern to see that particular myth busted. Stioned are adding the Indian exactly how unities. Today, to a Mumbai based headding the India - both fairly. This was trialian according to a Mumbai based head head huntill not as lot of the hich many quallowed world. If you don't fancy with Indian out then indian outsourcial Express report that still nomies such as In In that seconomies such of better costern profession't fancy work particular myth busted.

    2. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh?

      I don't think anyone here was able to understand a single phrase from that post.

    3. Re:Myth busting by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I get spam composed of random words that makes more sense than that.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    4. Re:Myth busting by prockcore · · Score: 0, Informative

      Good to see that particular myth busted.

      It hasn't been busted, because it's not a myth. You have to immigrate to india, there's no work visa program.

      I'm not going become an Indian citizen just to find work.. that's just unacceptable.

    5. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      just pick somewhere else with a lower cost of living

      Like your parent's basement?

    6. Re:Myth busting by ircShot_guN · · Score: 1

      Normally I would say, sure head on over to Aus. I live here and the cost of living is tiny.

      HOWEVER.

      If you work in IT you are best to get out of the Australia, not into it.

      Telstra, arguably Australia's largest IT/Communications firm has just out-sourced 100 million dollars worth of it's call center and programming operations to Mumbai in India.

      The Aus IT market is shocking at the moment. If you are willing to put in the milage, China is probably the only IT sector in the world at the moment that is still in (in fact only begging to!) boom.

    7. Re:Myth busting by be-fan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes there is, if you've got a letter from an Indian company.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's their work visa program? I show up at New Dehli airport with a letter?

      Wow, they sure know how to do things over there.

    9. Re:Myth busting by Quixote · · Score: 1
      ... and you dragged this "fact" out of your nether regions ?

      Here's a fact for you: multinational companies have been doing business in India for decades. Many of the top managers, etc. in MNCs are non-Indians, on temporary worker visas.

      Each country has its own rules and regulations. Just because you have one set of rules, it does not mean the rest of the world has to follow your rules.

      US is a country built on immigration. The US govt has, over the period of nearly a century, put in place streamlined ways to enter the country to work, immigrate, etc.

      India is 56 years old. Till recently, people wanted to get out of India; noone ever thought that there'd be people lining up wanting to get in to work. Give them time, and they will formulate rules and regulations to facilitate this.

    10. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Normally I would say, sure head on over to Aus. I live here and the cost of living is tiny.

      That's gotta be the funniest thing I've heard all day. On an Australian salary, living in a capital city (Sydney and Melbourne in particular) is not a cheap exercise. And forget about ever buying a house to live in. You want cheap living in Australia, sure, move to a regional area. But that's not where most of the jobs are. Living in Sydney is an expensive proposition, and it isn't getting any cheaper.

    11. Re:Myth busting by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 1

      And, do you sincerely believe that foreigners can just walk into US for a job without a job offer and a H1B?

      Ofcourse I am not counting the illegal border crossing, but for programming jobs that is irrelevant.

    12. Re:Myth busting by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You apply for a Visa with Indian Embassy in Washington, DC. The letter is one of the supporting documents (photo ID, etc) required for the application.

      More details can be found at their website.

      Geez. For people so obsessed with Microsoft/SCO FUD, Slashdot seems to have no problem generating FUD of its own!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Myth busting by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      If you don't fancy working in India, just pick somewhere else with a lower cost of living than the US, and set up shop there.

      Actually, this is a brilliant idea, assuming it is managed well.

      Your 401K (or whatever is left of it) will last for decades in India and you will have the advantage as being seen as a willing immigrant. For many non-Americans, typical Americans are perceived as blowhard, self-important morons. This is a popular interpretation and is certainly not true of most USans.

      I'm guessing that if you make an attempt to learn a bit of the language and try to fit in a bit, you'll find a great deal of respect.

    14. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is so fucking weird. No wonder they're still a 2nd world nation. A billion people and they can't get their act together.

    15. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      New Zealand and Australia are extremely hard to get into for employment. Hell, last time I was in New Zealand was 1988 and it was hard to get in if you were black. *ahem*

      Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash and you must be highly qualified in a professional field to move. Australia and New Zealand last I checked not only require that, but they require an existing job offer to enter--and you are forbidden from changing visa status without returning home. Not many people will be recruited ahead of time. Sure, you can enter as a university student to gain contacts, but how many unemployed computer programmers have enough to pay up front for a AU/NZ degree AND all their living expenses for three years PLUS two return air tickets and six more months living expense so you can go home while the residency visa is granted, at which point you will need a full years' contingency fund that will be checked on arrival or adios muchachos--assuming you haven't been found to break the employment restriction, which in the case of Australia will bar you from ever returning again? Oh, IT'S SOOOO BLOODY EASY. Right.

      The fact is, most countries are practically impossible to emmigrate to--especially commonwealth countries from anywhere but another commonwealth country and especially Australia when your departure country is the United States because too many of us have tried to change visa status while in Australia (read: illegal employment). If you're already out of work, the financial restrictions make it a complete fantasy. If you're not out of work, it's such an enormous gamble, why would you try unless you truly wanted to permanently move to the country in question for reasons other than immediate employment?

      The H1-B program in the United States was not exactly par for the international course. We let in well over 600,000 people on H1-B in five years. Once I see numbers like India granting over one million residency and employment visas PER YEAR (a roughly equal proportion), I'll buy this argument that the lack of reciprocity is a myth. The same goes for Indian academics. Bangalore University has TWO SEATS per department available for international students--and they have a quarter million students. My university had less than five thousand students and we had that many seats--just for Brazil.

      Myth my ass. I would _love_ to go work in a number of countries, not all of them on the economic level of Australia. However, in many countries it often isn't possible at any price--just try to get a work visa for South Africa, for instance. Oh sure, you can get a long-term residency permit if you've got $100,000 in the bank, but you won't be able to seek employment without risking deportation. Most countries are very protective of their labor markets and aren't about to dilute them with Americans who they see as not needing the work nearly as badly. This translates to a cynical lack of reciprocity that basically boils down to "you're American, ergo you're rich, ergo you don't need to take our jobs." Of course, the same voices seem to think we should give up our jobs for them when they show up at our doors.

    16. Re:Myth busting by be-fan · · Score: 1

      India is part of the Soviet Union? That's new to me! Try and understand what the term means, dumb-fuck. In any case, since there is no longer a Soviet Union, the term "3rd world" is antiquated --- the term "developing nation" is more accurate.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:Myth busting by adam872 · · Score: 1

      Rubbish.

      Two good friends of mine are working in Mumbai for the same company I work for. They were able to obtain working visas without a problem.

    18. Re:Myth busting by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, IT'S SOOOO BLOODY EASY. Right.

      I didn't say it was easy - I said it was possible. I think you somewhat overrate the difficulty of emigrating to NZ or Australia - no, it is not trivial, but it is far from impossible, especially if you are skilled and have some cash reserves. It is FAR easier than emigrating to the US from NZ or Australia.

      The fact is, most countries are practically impossible to emmigrate to--especially commonwealth countries from anywhere but another commonwealth country and especially Australia when your departure country is the United States because too many of us have tried to change visa status while in Australia (read: illegal employment). If you're already out of work, the financial restrictions make it a complete fantasy. If you're not out of work, it's such an enormous gamble, why would you try unless you truly wanted to permanently move to the country in question for reasons other than immediate employment?

      Let's be honest, the US is generally regarded to be the most anally retentive country in the world when it comes to immigration. Consider all those people stuck in green card lotteries. Comparatively Commonwealth countries are reasonably easy going. They expect you to have work lined up, or a high liklehood of finding work, but that's not at all unreasonable. The plan is not to just try and move there - Start looking for work there, apply for every programming job going in your target country(ies), and once you have a job offer your odds of getting visas etc. skyrocket.

      I know several people who have successfully emigrated to NZ or Australia, it is nowhere near as difficult as you seem to imply (that is, you imply that it is effectively impossible - which it most definitely is NOT).

      Jedidiah.

    19. Re:Myth busting by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IT jobs market in Australia isn't much better than the US. Go compete with someone else ;)

    20. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The terms "2nd World" and "3rd World" are bandied about but really are not related to one another.

      2nd World was a political term that was used mainly during the cold war and referred to nations that were not aligned with either axis of the Cold War nations. India and China (oddly enough) were both 2nd World nations.

      3rd World is mainly an economic term that is used to define nations based on their economic standing in the world. So conceivably, one could be be both 2nd World and 3rd World.

      I would suggest that you continue your education before admonishing anyone else.

    21. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only cool thing about New Zealand are the Maoris. Of course the white pieces of shit in New Zealand treat them like shit.

      Your cunt of a PM should be killed forthwith.

    22. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anally retentive? More difficult?

      You can come to the United States without a long term visa, THEN find work, THEN get your visa status changed. That's pretty NON-anally retentive. Do that in Australia and not only will you find yourself back home, you can never return.

      It is the fact that we are so ridiculously permissive and the rest of the world still cries that we're "generally regarded to be the most anally retentive country in the world when it comes to immigration" that pisses us off because practically nowhere else is so open.

      Go try to get yourself German citizenship and get back to me on how restrictive the United States is.

    23. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, by giving them permanent representation in government like we do with our natives... oh, wait...

      *cough*

    24. Re:Myth busting by be-fan · · Score: 1

      According to my sources your definition is not correct.

      The phrase is pretty much universally used in this sense. Most think the phrase originated from some writer in France, and the terms parallel the French First, Second, and Third estates.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    25. Re:Myth busting by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      2nd World was a political term that was used mainly during the cold war and referred to nations that were not aligned with either axis of the Cold War nations

      No, actually, 2nd world was the Soviet Bloc. 1st world was the West. Everything else was 3rd. here's a cool map

    26. Re:Myth busting by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      You can come to the United States without a long term visa, THEN find work, THEN get your visa status changed. That's pretty NON-anally retentive. Do that in Australia and not only will you find yourself back home, you can never return.

      Yes, that's all very nice, but that doesn'd address the key point of how easy it is to actually obtain the work visa. It can be painfully difficult to get one for the US. Comparatively it is pretty easy for a sponsored employee to get one to Australia. That means you need to have a job offer from a reputable company that's going to vouch for you, but that's all it takes. If you are a skilled tech worker from the US, it's quite possible.

      I am not claiming that any of this is EASY I am simply trying to point out that it is entirely possible, and worth investigating if you really are that hard pressed finding IT work in the US.

      And to all the Australians paniced by this possibility: Set up your outsourcing companies now, and steal the cream of the outsourcing contracts from India. Well, that's the theory. I can't help you with the problem of having all those bloody Americans around.

      Jedidiah.

    27. Re:Myth busting by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Australia and New Zealand last I checked not only require that, but they require an existing job offer to enter
      It is very hard to emigrate to Australia, one guy I know with a Phd from an Australian university in a field where people are needed spent several years trying to get residency - another had to live apart from his Australian wife for quite some time before he was allowed in. Immigration is the major election issue in Australia, and no-one has any sense of humor about it, so working in Australia without the right visa, or overstaying your visa is going to get you rapidly deported or locked up for a very long time in a privatised prison camp deep in the desert.
    28. Re:Myth busting by dbIII · · Score: 1
      For many non-Americans, typical Americans are perceived as blowhard, self-important morons.
      In every nation you get loud idiots, but it seems to have been business practice for many US companies to send these folk overseas to loudly thump tables and leave, or to set up a branch with no budget with the aim of using the locals as slaves, then spectacularly crash and burn. Clueless religeous evangalists doing things like interupting an Easter procession in St Petersberg with cries of "turn to Jesus" (I don't know who they think the guy on the cross in the procession is supposed to be) or Mormons building opulent temples don't help much either. The simple solution is to restict the export of loud idiots, or limit the damage they do to the company or national reputation.

      Other countries don't help, by importing loud idiots. In some countries it is seen as an enhancement to share price to employ a CEO who is from somewhere else. This creates a moving mass of hopeless CEO's that never turn a profit, but keep the share price high and leave with a big payout before everything comes crashing down - but do have that vital accent that ensures US investment, and reassures locals who wouldn't think of making half the claims if they had twice the ability. Darl from SCO has a bright future ahead of him.

    29. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We do that as well--it's called a fscking H1-B. We also grant EB-[1-5] visas ex post facto. You also don't have to be a highly skilled professional. You can be a dish washer.

      Immigration is difficult anywhere, but to claim that the United States is "the most anally retentive," especially compared to Australia and New Zealand, is just ridiculous. For Christ's sake, we've done blanket amnesties for illegal aliens. Sort of "right, lost track of all of you, can't be bothered, you're legal now." We're about to do it again this year. Oh, how anally retentive.

    30. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada and Austraia are much easier to get permanent residence in than the US. That's where H1-B that could not get US Green cards move.

      This is especially true for Canada that has recently had a huge influx of immigrants. This was the only English speaking country where you could easily immigrate without being an IT worker. The rules tightened somewhat 1-2 years back, but now relaxed again.

    31. Re:Myth busting by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Nice hand-waving.

      What was that diatribe all about, anyway?

    32. Re:Myth busting by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent Wrong
      Check your facts

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
    33. Re:Myth busting by mre5565 · · Score: 1
      > Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash and you must be highly qualified in a professional field to move.


      Generally perhaps, but American's can use the
      NAFTA free trade provisions to enter Canada
      for work for certain classifications including
      high tech.

    34. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash

      Do you mean that you had to have $30,000 on you to move to Canada? Or you actually have to PAY THAT AMOUNT OF MONEY TO CANADA to be allowed to move there?!

    35. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you have to do in America is walk across the border and you're good as gold. Or, at the worst, find a chick to mary. I know a lot of women who are married to Canadian men and others just so they can become residents/citizens of America.

      It's too bad that we're the easiest in the world, because the easier we are, the more crap we have to take in. We take other country's complete shit and have to somehow make a go of it.

    36. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      No THEY'RE NOT! For Canada, if you have a bachelor's degree, the most desirable age (21-49) the maximum employment history and the highest english fluency -- you will get 67 points, which is the absolute lowest you may score to be granted a Visa. If you are deficient, even slightly in any of these, say, you're aged 50, or your english is merely "good", YOU WILL NOT BE GIVEN A RESIDENCE VISA.

      Besides, between 1991-2002 we admitted 11,223,467 as permanent residents. That's four times the population of New Zealand, 60% the population of Australia and 1/3 the population of Canada. 11.2 Million new residents in 11 years. Sounds like we're really being difficult about it.

    37. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Under NAFTA, you get a work permit, but you don't get permanent residency. Your work must be pre-arranged and it must be temporary. You may not be self-employed. It is granted for one year increments only and will trigger an investigation if it appears you are trying to permanently reside in Canada without actually immigrating.

      NAFTA is NOT an immigration wild card for Americans.

    38. Re:Myth busting by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Let's be honest, the US is generally regarded to be the most anally retentive country in the world when it comes to immigration.

      No it's not. At least not by anyone who's tried to get legal status elsewhere. Let's see you try to go to Switzerland or Austria and get resident alien status. Good fucking luck.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    39. Re:Myth busting by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      " it is nowhere near as difficult as you seem to imply (that is, you imply that it is effectively impossible - which it most definitely is NOT)."

      I have been looking into immigrating to NZ and let me tell you that it's very hard. Not only that it gets harder every year. The people you know probably got there before the rules were changed.

      First of all you are punished if you are older or don't have millions of dollars. If you don't have a degree then you might as well forget it. Finally you need a job offer and nobody in NZ is offering jobs to people who are not citizens.

      I would love nothing better then to live in NZ and work very hard just like I do in the US. I am a highly paid person here and I'd take a pay cut to work there because it's such a beautiful place but since I don't have a degree there is not a chance in hell it will ever happen.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    40. Re:Myth busting by KavyBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, you're wrong on almost all counts. I know because I've done it. I showed up in New Zealand on vacation and had a job offer two weeks later. I went to immigration and walked out with a two-year work visa. I don't even have an IT degree. My wife is here full-term on a work visa that allows her to stay as long as I'm here. A year into it and I'm sitting in my own house in NZ right now. I can apply for long-term residency and probably get it.
      Now, it wasn't a cake walk, but it was FAR from difficult. I work with a 20-year-old American that's here same as me, so it's not like I'm a special case. No huge sums of work experince and cash are required.

    41. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would never live in India it sleeze pool and you have better living conditions living in a cardboard box in the US

    42. Re:Myth busting by apankrat · · Score: 1

      > > Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash and you must be highly qualified in a professional field to move.

      > Generally perhaps, but American's can use the NAFTA free ...

      To get Canadian immigration visa one need to have
      (a) a degree in something useful
      (b) a work experience
      (c) be able to speak English or French
      (d) and not be unreasonably old.

      Also you need to prove you around 5k (not 30k) on an account in a recognized bank. Application processing times vary by the country, but AFAIK it's under 6 months for States.

      For computer professionals there is (or at least was) a fast track called Pilot Project, which allows getting work visa in under 2 weeks with minimal bureaucracy and 0 (zero) money requirements. It does require a valid job offer though.

      Check Citizenship and Immigration Canada site for details. 2c.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    43. Re:Myth busting by ppanon · · Score: 1

      And in that same period, 1,830,680 people emigrated into Canada. Now in 2001, we had 31 million to your 281 million, so we had nearly 50% more immigration per capita. Not that it's a race and anybody's counting or anything.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    44. Re:Myth busting by ChazeFroy · · Score: 1

      If only slashdot had a rating of 6.

    45. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I was just there and for amusement checked into it. No job offer, you can't immigrate there except for refugeee reasons, unless you have a buttload of money (think it's 500,000NZ$ for "investment")

      Taken right from Te Papa the national museum, where you can fill out a questionairre to see if you qualify. I was SHOCKED. Answered yes to everything except pending job offer (yes good health, yes age good, yes degree, one other yes) and no to job offer, boom! REJECT!

    46. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't even bother with the moron :).

    47. Re:Myth busting by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      And in that same period, 1,830,680 people emigrated into Canada. Now in 2001, we had 31 million to your 281 million, so we had nearly 50% more immigration per capita. Not that it's a race and anybody's counting or anything.

      Ah, but according to here, over 50% of those immigrants are from the United States (23%) Australia (6.44%) or Europe (20.5%). And most of them come with money.

      Most people that come to the United States have very little to begin with. That makes a difference.

    48. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Especially considering that commonwealth citizens have almost instantaneous permanent residency in any other member state. Whoopee.

    49. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      ...and yet, I knew a guy from Christchurch who waltzed straight-away into the states, got a job as a fscking CAR SALESMAN for godssake, oh we've really got a shortage of those, god help us if we don't import them from friggen Waitangi. Got his permanent residency. I seem to recall it had something to do with being a religious refugee. Oh, then got thrown out for buggering a 14 year-old. I can forgive him for that indiscretion as the New Zealand government doesn't mind as much if you bugger small boys, but still. Didn't follow that old "when in Rome" bit, I guess.

      Perhaps when he said we were "anally retentive" there was some alternate Kiwi definition we're not in on...

      But yes, New Zealand is a beautiful place...especially if you like buggery...or sheep... or both... or rugby, which is sort of them same thing, but with snappy uniforms.

    50. Re:Myth busting by jrumney · · Score: 1
      First of all you are punished if you are older or don't have millions of dollars. If you don't have a degree then you might as well forget it. Finally you need a job offer and nobody in NZ is offering jobs to people who are not citizens.

      I can't beleive it. NZ only gives residency visas to people who will contribute positively to the economy? What bastards. Every other country welcomes those who come to sponge off their taxpayers. </sarcasm>

    51. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, anally rententive. In no other country have I had to take my shoes off or remove my laptop from its case before it goes through the XRay (its an XRay for fucks sake, it can see through the fake leather of a laptop case). In no other country do immigration officials not understand their own anally rententive rules and advise a German woman with young baby that she'll be allowed back into the country after she visits her sick mother, then treat her like a criminal when she does come back. In no other country can I be refused entry because I forgot to hand back a little green slip that immigration officials make no effort to collect when I exit the country.

    52. Re:Myth busting by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The NZ immigration website has a lot of info about obtaining residency visas because the rules for those are simple and clear cut. Work permits have to be considered on a case by case basis, so you don't find so much information about them, and maybe that is why people are so confused. The normal way to get residency in any country is to get a work permit first, then apply for residency once you've been there for some time. Slashdotters seem to be expecting to get instant residency, which for many countries does not exist, or in the US exists only as a lottery process, and in NZ and Australia there are certain qualifications that let you skip the work permit and immigrate directly. When seen in that context, NZ and Australia are in fact lenient compared with most countries.

    53. Re:Myth busting by haggar · · Score: 1

      He was wrong about New Zealand being hard to enter/settle, but he was right on the money about the lack of reciprocity. I object to your poo-poointg his whole post on just the New Zealand issue.

      --
      Sigged!
    54. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never gone through customs at Heathrow or been sprayed with insecticide by New Zealand and/or Australia.

    55. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      The United States also has arrested in excess of one million illegal aliens--and as high as 1.7 million--every single year since 1980. Between 1991-2002, we expelled 13.5 million illegal aliens. In the last twenty years, we have deported more illegal aliens than Australia has citizens today and since 1971, as many as the current population of Canada, or, say, California. On top of that, we admit an equal number of legal immigrants.

      Oh, we're being SO miserly with immigration only dealing with an annual immigrant inflow equal to the entire population of Alberta. If we didn't deport all the illegal immigrants since 1990, we would have had total immigration exceeding the current population of Canada. ...and yes, we've been counting since 1820. The total is now over 68 million, not counting the ones we sent back.

    56. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You could try New Zealand or Australia - both fairly western countries"

      I thought they were both fairly eastern countries last time I checked, unless 'western' means developed white-majority countries.

    57. Re:Myth busting by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      haha, depends which map ur using. in aus we have politically correct maps with the southern hemisphere at the top =)

    58. Re:Myth busting by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      only if you think that the only people who can possibly contribute to your economy are 21 year old collage graduates. I contribute to this economy even though neither one of those facts is true.

      The fact is that they don't want people to immigrate there. Why? Because most people who want to immigrate are indians and other people from south east asia. As everybody in the US knows these people will immigrate to your country and work their tails off doing whatever meanial job they can find to make themselves better off. They will work hardder, think more, get up earlier, go to sleep later and eventually work their way up the social ladder. Go to any engineering school in the US and you'll see that the top 30% of the students all have dark skin and foreign accents.

      NZ apparently does not want that. They want to remain pretty white and monoculture. Since they can't legally discrimminate against skin color they shut everybody out.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    59. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can come to the United States without a long term visa, THEN find work, THEN get your visa status changed.

      Not if you came to the US from Australia (or any other visa waiver country). You have to leave the US to change your visa status.

      Admittedly, leaving the country for trip to a US embassy is easier in the US than Australia, but that is an accident of geography.

      Ask anyone who has had to deal with the lunkheads at the INS (now Dept of Fatherland Security) and I doubt they will tell you that moving to the US was easy or the INS was permissive.

      Any organization that has backlogs going back over five years and that is unable to implement laws passed by Congress in 2000 is hardly open!

    60. Re:Myth busting by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I assume you are looking at NZ's point system for gaining permanent residency without first spending time living in the country on a work permit, or similar visa, which is the normal route for emmigrating to ANY country. That point system is clearly aimed at affluent, well educated people of about 40 years of age (not 21 as you claim). Not only do you get points for education, but you get points for work experience too, up to a point. New Zealand actually has a reasonably large South Asian population, many of whom have entered as skilled migrants in medical and engineering fields, others have come via Fiji, where they were basically forced out in the early '90s. Unlike yourself, most New Zealanders do not hold any grudges against our South Asian immigrants, though there is some resentment against the recent influx of East Asian immigrants, many of whom appear to be unsupervised rich kids gone wild. Many of the top students when I was at Engineering School were Chinese Malaysians, who were discriminated against by their own country's education system, and chose to study abroad. Once people realised why they chose to study in New Zealand instead of Malaysia, any animosity disappeared. After reading your rant, I am glad that New Zealand turned down your application (if you ever applied, I suspect your rant is purely from ignorance though), we don't need your type here.

    61. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe "2nd World" referred to the actual Soviet-aligned nations, while 3rd world was everyone else, including India and China. I don't have a citation at the moment though.

    62. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't fancy working in India, just pick somewhere else with a lower cost of living than the US, and set up shop there.

      And exactly how many places have you moved a family to? Not counting getting a job out of college and moving just your car to the new city that is.

    63. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of "long term visa". You can tranfer to H-1B visa from student visa (F-1), but not from other type of visa such as B-2.

    64. Re:Myth busting by An+dochasac · · Score: 1

      I'm a U.S. citizen working abroad on an "H1-B like" visa. Here are some differences: U.S. H1-B Allows free movement between companies, I'm tied to my company. U.S. H1-B is valid for 6 years, I have to renew every year. My wife had to obtain her own work visa separately, but it expired during her maternity leave and the company wasn't willing to renew it under the same terms as she held before. Our baby currently has some citizenship rights in this country, but local politicians are threatening to remove this right retroactively. A baby born in the U.S. and it's parents have some rights. Our baby has some rights, but we have nothing that wasn't part of our original 1 year visa. People with children born here are deported every day, in the U.S. we always grant amnesty. There are thousands of citizens from this country working illegally in the U.S. right now.

    65. Re:Myth busting by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > I've done it.

      Are you black as the original poster is? Haven't you benefitted from the bubble?

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    66. Re:Myth busting by forkboy · · Score: 1

      NAFTA is NOT an immigration wild card for Americans.

      It sure as fuck is for the Mexicans, though.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    67. Re:Myth busting by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      I can't beleive it. NZ only gives residency visas to people who will contribute positively to the economy? What bastards. Every other country welcomes those who come to sponge off their taxpayers.

      Only Canada.

    68. Re:Myth busting by KavyBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the company I work for just hired a black American, so you can't use that argument. One tester is Indian, and one is Chinese, and I'm white so I think we have the bases covered on race considering the size of the company. Or course that's just one place, but race isn't a big deal in NZ as far as I can tell.

    69. Re:Myth busting by AltismoMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am an American student that just finished a Masters Degree here in Australia, and am able to stay in the country while applying for a Perminant Residency. All while working full time without violating my visa. (and I don't have to leave the country)

      So it's not that bloody hard, but you do have to get a graduate degree, not just an undergrad.

      --
      Create music
    70. Re:Myth busting by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
      With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
      Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
      A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
      Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
      Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
      Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
      The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.

      "Keep ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries she
      with silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    71. Re:Myth busting by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      If you read my post you'd understand that I admire immigrants not resent them. I admire their willingness to work their assess off and make a better world for themselves. You have projected your own racism to me. I think the immigrants in the US repsent the brightest and the hardest working people in America.

      I have visited NZ and I can tell you unequavically that there are a large number of racists there who badmouth the indians, maoris, malasians and anybody else who is not white. The govt policies on immigration reflect that.

      Finally I don't know what you mean by "reasonably large" population of South Asians. I don't know what the actual figures are but during my travels in both the north and south island I don't think more then 5% of the population was dark skinned.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    72. Re:Myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From the CIA World Factbook page on New Zealand:

      Ethnic groups: New Zealand European 74.5%, Maori 9.7%, other European 4.6%, Pacific Islander 3.8%, Asian and others 7.4%

    73. Re:Myth busting by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

      Of the 200 million adult americans, 14 million have advanced degrees, two million of those are over 65 years old. Limiting to those with a master's or higher effectively cuts out 94% of the population. I'd say that makes it "hard." Even including bachelor's degrees brings it to 44 million, which cuts out 78% of the adult population. The term "educated elite" wasn't coined without reason...

    74. Re:Myth busting by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I am shocked that there are that many maoris in NZ. Maybe they keep to their reservations who knows.

      I don't know what "others" means but according to the CIA around 80% of NZ is white european. That's stuningly homogenous if you ask me. Also if you leave aukland pretty much everybody is white.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    75. Re:Myth busting by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Interesting that you round 74.5% to 80%, and then call that homogenous. Perhaps you should take a look at your own country's ethnic makeup, its quite a bit closer to 80%. Your views on New Zealand come from a position of extreme ignorance. You didn't see any Maori when you were there? I call your bluff and say you haven't BEEN there. You cannot go to New Zealand and not see Maori, they are everywhere, certainly not "on their reservations".

    76. Re:Myth busting by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I am adding NZ europeans and other europeans because they are both white. IS that too hard for you?

      "Perhaps you should take a look at your own country's ethnic makeup, its quite a bit closer to 80%. "

      No it's not. Hispanics alone make up for almost 20% in this country. Add to that African americans, arabs, orientals etc and you get a sizable minority population.

      "You didn't see any Maori when you were there? "

      I saw some not 10% though. A few here and there. The influence of the culture is everywhere but the not the Maoris themselves.

      BTW I visited both islands and drove around a lot. I didn't visit everywhere but I saw a good representation I think.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  13. Unnecessary hype by Freston+Youseff · · Score: 3, Informative

    It will all balance out in the end.

    --

    1. Re:Unnecessary hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It will all balance out in the end.

      Yes, it will, but many jobs will be lost (and gained) before it does.

    2. Re:Unnecessary hype by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, when we all have to work 90 hour weeks, and live in hovels.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. Can't Hurt by danaan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think anything that gets more people out of their own territories and out into a different part of the world where they have the opportunity to see what it's like in other places can only help in the long run. Sure, a fluid labor force is a "good thing", but people who have experienced different cultures, laws, religions, biases and viewpoints is even more valuable.

    1. Re:Can't Hurt by trud · · Score: 0

      Maybe those (Americans) that did experience a significant taste of a third world country might be more inclined to appreciate what we (Americans) have .

      Outsource the politicians.

    2. Re:Can't Hurt by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what's more important is that they (Americans) might be more inclined to appreciate what they (wherever) have.

      KFG

    3. Re:Can't Hurt by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a non-American who has experienced living in a number of cultures and observed the attitudes of others after returning to my homeland, I can assure you that this is not limited to Americans.

  16. HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by aspelling · · Score: 2

    What needs to be done to get job visa in India? Should I post my resume in Indian newspaper? Will my 10 years of experience in US count? Should I speak any Indian languages?

    1. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Should I speak any Indian languages?

      Yes. English. This could prove a significant barrier to Americans.

      KFG

    2. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by lahosken · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose they might haze the new guy by telling him to learn the Hindi for "foo".

      I know I would.

    3. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by ThoughtWorker · · Score: 1

      All Indian software professionals speak English, or at least 99% of them do. It may not be flawless, and some people may have accents, but its no big barrier in understanding stuff. And in the large cities, like Bangalore, Delhi, Mumbai, etc., most people speak English. No need to learn the local languages.

    4. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't speak English. They speak American!

    5. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans spoke english ?
      Ooh strange...

    6. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they do speak flawless english, only with an accent. The perceived flaws are usually just use of words that do not correspond to North American dialect.

    7. Re:HOW TO GET H1B FOR INDIA? by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      no need to learn the language to survive yes, but if you are really planning to re-locate anywhere for more than a year it can be an isolating experience not knowing the local language.

  17. India: Foreigner workers welcome* by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    *Foreigners desiring to work in India are welcome only if they locate in Andhra Pradesh .
    (Source: HotJobs.com)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by boaworm · · Score: 2

      Well, as far as I know, its not much different in the US. I live in Scandinavia, and the only way I could move to the US and work would be to get "sponsored" by a large company. I have to have some skill or competence that they cannot aquire otherwise. (Like CS skills AND language) I cannot just move to the US and start looking for jobs. Why should it be any different in India ? (or, well, why is it like this at all. It does not seem like "free movement of labor" to me).

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    2. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      informative? A joke equivelent to "Houston's Hot!" informative? Yikes.

      -- rjt

    3. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by tealover · · Score: 1

      Is this the same Scandinavia that is enacting laws to keep foreigners (mainly Muslims) out of their countries? Seems like xenophobia can still thrive in such enlightened nations.

      The only thing I can tell you is start learning the Koran. You won't be able to keep them out for long.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    4. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Which of course, is less than one-third the number of people who died in France.

    5. Re:India: Foreigner workers welcome* by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      In America, conservative Christians restrict Scandanavian cultural behaviors.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  18. Re:the burning question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, you haven't been to India. It does get hot there, too..although the winters are much cooler i the north than in the south where they are mild.

  19. India is a dreadful, dreadful place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was forced to go to India, I wouldn't go to the bathroom the entire trip.

    1. Re:India is a dreadful, dreadful place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u must have a really big bladder! Or r u practing tantrics?

  20. unlikely by ThoughtWorker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unless someone wants to move to India forever, it doesnt make financial sense. Indian software companies are not going to pay more for an American working in India just because he is American (or whatever country he comes from). And so people moving there will have to work at the going salaries of that market. And with those salaries, you cant retire very comfortably in the United States, for example. So, anyone interested in a permanent move?

    1. Re:unlikely by ankit · · Score: 1

      One could obviously work for a couple of years, or even longer, and come back once the employment situation in America improved. It is way better than staying unemployed, or working minumum wage and struggling financially in the US.

      --
      Don't Panic
    2. Re:unlikely by tealover · · Score: 1

      No it's not. You could get a fast food job in the US and make the same amount of money that a programmer in India makes.

      Sure, the cost of living in India would be cheaper, but most people won't have to go to the drastic level of getting such a low paying job. Most people would probably accept a lower-paying job in the same field. It's happened to a lot of people that I used to work with.

      But if you live in Manhattan and are thinking of moving to India, I'd certainly be interestedin subletting your apartment.

      I'd pay you relative to your new Indian living standard, of course. ;>)

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    3. Re:unlikely by saihung · · Score: 1

      So, anyone interested in a permanent move?

      You mean unlike, say, the hundreds of thousands of Indians who have moved to the United States to become American citizens, raise American children, and die on American soil? We think nothing of people forsaking their homelands to move to the United States. We created this system, and we don't have the right to complain when people apply our own rules to us.

    4. Re:unlikely by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it _is_ better. When applying for a job in the US, will the employer rather have:

      a) A guy with extensive experience of Indian culture and business environment, has a working knowlwedge of Hindi (or other major Indian languages), and has shown the drive and independence to relocate to a differenct continent in the first place; or

      b) A guy who knows how to handle the deep fryer at McDonalds?

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:unlikely by henrik · · Score: 1

      Well, in ten years time India will be a modern, democratic, open and free society and the USA will be a police state. Where _do_ you want to retire?

    6. Re:unlikely by glandragor · · Score: 1

      You mean unlike, say, the hundreds of thousands of Indians who have moved to the United States to become American citizens, raise American children, and die on American soil? We think nothing of people forsaking their homelands to move to the United States.
      You missed the point completely. The original poster was pointing out that when people immigrate to the U.S. from India, their income in the U.S. is an order of magnitude larger than it is back home. I know several Indians that have worked in the U.S. over the past 10 years that could go back to India and retire comfortably, if they chose to. For whatever reason, they prefer to stay in the U.S. (at least the immigrants I've worked with). U.S. citizens going the other way see a decrease of an order of magnitude - meaning that they would have a hard time saving enough to survive if they came back.
      The real problem is that globalization is deflationary to the U.S., but given the highly leveraged credit situation most Americans find themselves in, we will do anything to avoid it.

    7. Re:unlikely by tealover · · Score: 1

      You are taking me waaaay too literally. I was using that analogy as an extreme example.

      Clearly most people are not going to work in a fast food restaurant. They'll take more practical steps like working in a similar job/field for less money. That's what happening to a lot of people these days.

      I knew sarcasm didn't travel well on the web, I didn't know analogies were problematic also.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    8. Re:unlikely by Servo · · Score: 1

      No it's not. You could get a fast food job in the US and make the same amount of money that a programmer in India makes.


      But in India, you'd live like you worked on Wall Street.

      Sure, the cost of living in India would be cheaper, but most people won't have to go to the drastic level of getting such a low paying job. Most people would probably accept a lower-paying job in the same field. It's happened to a lot of people that I used to work with.


      Moving to a new country to get a job is "drastic" for most people, no doubt. But you must realize that many people move from one region to another all the time with cost of living differences. I work in the NYC metro area. If I took the same job in Northeast FL where I grew up, I could easily drop my salary by $20k and still live just as comfortable as I do here.

      But if you live in Manhattan and are thinking of moving to India, I'd certainly be interestedin subletting your apartment.

      I'd pay you relative to your new Indian living standard, of course. ;>)


      Riiiiiiight.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    9. Re:unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I could never live with so many Indian people. I might be able to live with Chinese or Japanese people, even S. Americans, but Indian people....no way.

      I'll take my police state over curry eaters any day.

    10. Re:unlikely by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      Here are a few choice quotes that are easily missed:

      over the past six months inquiries have begun coming in from top-level and middle-level executives exploring job opportunities in top technology firms. This is in addition to regular middle-level and top-level management positions held by foreigners in multinational companies that have large operations here.

      First of all notice he is talking about management positions. I would bet that this is more a response to the backlash in the U.S. to offshoring of jobs. Communication and project management between U.S. firms and Indian companies they contract with would be smoother if there are U.S. or British managers there to act as liasons. That takes some of the teeth out of the anti-offshoring peoples arguments. Indian companies will pay them handsomely if they have to to get those contracts.

      Many of the inquiries are for jobs in foreign-based multinationals.

      Foreign based multinationals can afford to pay the same for a manager in India as they can in the U.S. If they need an american manager in India then the multinational will pay whatever they need to attract an acceptable candidate. On a side note, multinational corporations have little nationalist loyalties. They exist to make their owners richer. If U.S. pollution laws got in their way they would have no compunction about moving a factory to Mexico. If the Mexicans tightened their pollution laws they would be just as happy to move it again to Guatemala. Welcome to globalization. Multinationals are not American companies or British companies or Indian companies. They headquarter wherever taxes are lowest (or even non-existent).

      ...large Indian companies... have started recruiting sales and marketing people in foreign markets. This has... acted as a push to look for jobs in India when the going at home gets tough.

      Again we are not talking about tech jobs here but Sales and Marketing droids, er, executives. And if the large Indian company is paying X amount for someone in a foreign market then they can certainly pay that for the same work performed in India though possibly with a downward cost of living adjustment. Or maybe not because after all jetting home to London for the holidays is expensive and they need these particular foreign workers, just like they needed the Finnish call center workers.

      The writer is a freelance journalist based in New Delhi.

      I am not suggesting that the writer was not being truthful about anything only that he is writing from his local perspective. In other words, consider the source. But the impression the article gives is contradicted by this article in the India Times which suggests that Indians are currently looking for ways to circumvent the H1-B visa caps. The author was kind of vague about which foreigners are trying to find work there. Bangalore was mentioned in addition to the U.S. and Britain. So are places like Bangalore the main source of these refugee workers?

    11. Re:unlikely by JanneM · · Score: 1

      But my point still stands. Sure, going down a bit in the foodchain is not nearly as 'bad' as fast food service work, but the person with the foreign experience will still tend to look like much better value for an employer.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    12. Re:unlikely by tealover · · Score: 1

      Not really. It depends entirely on what he did there. If he went there to work in a call center, it doesn't mean jack.

      If he went there to head up the development of a new technology center, then yes...that would look good. But it would look go no matter where you acquired that experience.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    13. Re:unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a working knowlwedge of Hindi (or other major Indian languages),

      That would be Hinglish.

    14. Re:unlikely by Stray7Xi · · Score: 1

      Ah but you're assuming that 30-40 years down the line that the Indian economy will still be lower then the US economy. Maybe they can move back after the US economy collapses.

    15. Re:unlikely by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I used to hear stuff like that when I was younger. It's not really true; foreign experience might be useful in some jobs, but not that many. If your chosen profession is programming, or engineering, non-technical experiences aren't going to help much if any. If you're trying to get into some high-up executive position that involves a lot of foreign travel, meeting with people from around the globe, etc., then sure it'd be very helpful. But all the complaining about outsourcing isn't about managerial or executive positions, it's about the plain ol' programming jobs.

      Personally, I wouldn't want an executive type job anyway. I got into engineering because I like to tinker with technical things, not because I liked meeting with people. If I wanted to spend all my time talking to people, I would have gone to management school. Also, the higher up you go on the corporate ladder, the less of a personal life you get. Those CEOs don't get things like families, free time, etc. They're constantly working. They might have a wife and kids, but the kids never see them, and the wife probably has a lover to keep her company.

    16. Re:unlikely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      anyone interested in a permanent move


      It would be nice to have that kind of job security (Office Space)

  21. Re:Think of Bollywood girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, 'White Trash' grlz will s*crew ANYBODY for $5 over here...
    **Cheaper** than going all the way to India

  22. EE Majors still worth anything? by boobsea · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm about to go onto college. I planned on majoring in CompSci, but I don't want to move aboard to get a job.

    Are Electrical Engineers having any similar problems with jobs being outsourced?

    Which degree should I get?

    1. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The difficulty in answering your question is that you have to be able to predict 4 years into the future.

      Perhaps you could visit a school you're interested in and see whether a lot of Indians and Chinese are in the program you're considering. If so, it's a good bet those countries are taking interest in the field. To me it seems that China, at least, is coming on strong in all technical fields, if a few years behind India in computer programming.

      As a datapoint, apparently Intel's Pentium-M chip (the best CPU for laptops at the moment) was done in Israel and was the first chip Intel ever finished on time.

    2. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you do, DONT get a CS degree if you plan to remain in the US. You are better off getting a Nursing or Physical Therapy degree. A CS degree is a waste of time and money. You'd be better off if you majored in Philosophy because at least you could get a writing job or go on to law school.

    3. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by trud · · Score: 0

      Become an Auto Mechanic, a Mortician, or a Lawyer.

    4. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by scrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Major in what you would like to do--not what you think other people would like you to do. You'll have plenty of chances to explore different areas once you enter a university.

    5. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      I think that many people would say that all the EE jobs have already been outsourced. ;-)

      Taiwan and Korea are the world leaders in this kind of stuff now.

    6. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by hgh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Electrical engineering is a lot of physics whereas compsci is a lot discrete math. If you're not interested in physics, then don't go for an EE degree. For example, in EE you'll learn how semi-conductors work and such; in comp sci you'll learn ways to traverse graphs, etc. Though there's certainly overlap in the fields. EE's need to know what they're designing for, and a comp sci that know's what's going on under the hood is typically better off than one who doesn't when doing anything practical.

      If you pick a major based on future job prospects you'll probably end up choosing a degree that doesn't suit your particular interests and wasting a lot of time doing something you don't like, and, odds are, if you don't like something you won't excel at it.

      Rather, choose the degree that most enjoy and run with it. If you're a talented computer scientist you'll have no trouble finding a job no matter what the economy is like. Personally, I think the EE degree is more versatile than a compsci degree, but that's just me.

      The choice also depends on the school you're planning to attend; the quality of each major with respect to the other will vary significantly between each school. You could also consider computer engineering, which lies somewhere between EE and compsci.

      Good luck

    7. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Akki · · Score: 1

      Horrible advice. Do want you want to do, or what you think might be most profitable, or what other people want you to do - it doesn't matter. You have an equal likelyhood of being screwed out of a job by outsourcing no matter what you do.

    8. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by scrod · · Score: 1

      Care to justify how that's "horrible advice" if he has "an equal likelyhood of being screwed out of a job by outsourcing" regardless of what he does? If you're going to arbitrarily doom him to failure, he might as well study things he's interested in.

    9. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Do both. Seriously. I did and straight out of college, there's a lot of job offers. Especially in the defense sector, where embedded computers are huge.

    10. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by kfg · · Score: 0

      It really doesn't matter what you major in, there's still a good chance you'll end up working at Wal-Mart. I'm serious. The number of people who end with careers in their degree field is pitifully small. I don't know where the idea that college was trade school came from. The idea that it is an effective trade school is just daft. There's absolutely no evidence for it. It seems to be a myth generated to get young people to go to college instead getting right to something useful and profitable, keeping jobs open to older workers, much as child labor laws were originally concieved as a way of restricting those available to the job market and not really "for the children."

      So my advice goes against the common grain. Go to college for an education. Enroll in a liberal arts program. That doesn't mean you can't major in CS, it just means you have to read some Shakespeare and take some modern dance as well.

      The time to specialize is when you go for your Masters, at which time you'll have a much better idea of where you want to head and why.

      For the most part you'll find that most jobs commonly available to a college graduate require the degree, but they don't really care overmuch about the degree is in. Shrub majored in history, not poli-sci. He could just as easily have majored in Sanskrit literature. It wouldn't have made a wit of difference to his career.

      While an undergraduate take the advice every grandparent used to give. "Chemistry? That's nice dear, but learn a trade so you have something to fall back on." In my day grandparents had lived through some pretty hard times and knew what was what when it came to surviving in an uncertain economy.

      Don't intern in your major. Most internships are pointless gopher jobs anyway. Make a friend in the electricians union. Learn to weld. Pick up double entry book keeping. Something like that. You'll end being happy you did at some point in your life.

      There are a lot of guys working in the Buffalo steel mills who did a doctoral dissertation translating LOTR into Urdu or something like that. They aren't too proud to work for a living. The "I'll only program" mindset seems to be a peculiarity of the IT crowd.

      Some of them are getting very hungry and starting to change their minds.

      KFG

    11. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by back_pages · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      Do not major in computer science at this time.

      First of all, a 4 year degree in Comp Sci is basically worthless in the USA right now. If you go for CS, understand that you will have to get a graduate degree unless you think PC Repair or telephone tech support is a great career for a college grad.

      Secondly, it's sort of an empty discipline. By that I mean that at the end of a very successful day, all you really achieve is a contribution to somebody else's geekiness; now they can make misogynist jokes and jerk off to internet porn. In rare circumstances, you really do make a substantial positive difference in someone else's life, but let's be serious. The world would be just fine without Mozilla, Winamp, Apache, Linux, Unix, IBM, Sun, and last but not least Microsoft. I'm not saying these are modern demons, but compare CS to disciplines like political science, diplomacy, theology, ethics, etc. where you are seriously working at improving someone's life, not their leisure. Even if you prove that NP = P, get over yourself. That's about the most goddamn geeky thing you could do with your life except maybe being the Magic: The Gathering grand champion.

      A computer science degree isn't the most portable thing in the world. Yes, you become an expert at algorithms and problem solving (IF you get a graduate degree) but other than that, you're pretty much an expert at reading technical documents and making instructions. That's not exactly the type of guy who gets hired for interdisciplinary management positions. Even if you do become an expert at problem solving, I haven't yet heard anyone say, "This is a serious [logistics/management/organizational/opportunity] problem, get me a COMPSCI GRAD!"

      I went into CS in 1998 and got my BS in 2002. Note the years: I chose CS 2 years before the .com bust and graduated 2 years later, give or take a few months. I didn't choose CS for the money but rather because I love the study and the process. It's like in the movie Good Will Hunting (not that I'm a super genius or anything) - I look at the stuff and it just makes sense to me in a way that no other subject ever has. Plus, it was a good career at the time.

      Now I'm basically a master of the Rubix cube and I'll have to move to a 3rd world country that may or may not have hostility toward my citizenship if I want to one day purchase a new economy car. I can't tell you whether or not EE is a better field, but for God's sake man, do not enter computer science at this time. If a genie gave me 1 wish in this life, I would go back to my freshman year of undergrad and choose a different field. I'd still be a computer geek, but you don't have to spend $150,000 on education to program, you go to Barnes & Noble and spend a couple hundred on books. It's far better to be an amateur hacker with a degree in business, in my humble but definitely qualified opinion.

    12. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1
      I am an old EE fart! I like electrical engineering. It took me years to learn what I needed to design circuits and control systems. It only took me months to learn to write code. Because it takes a lot to reach critical mass it is harder to train people to replace you.

      I know there are very bright and well educated people arouind the world. We are now in a global economy. Go for skills that are not quickly learned if you have the time, the inclination, and the funding.

      --

      Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    13. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you're not bitter. ;)

    14. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1

      I'm about to go onto college. I planned on majoring in CompSci, but I don't want to move aboard to get a job.

      Are Electrical Engineers having any similar problems with jobs being outsourced?


      Yes, outsourcing is very common with the design jobs that electical engineers do. Don't worry about it though, because as long as you do work that is a little bit off the beaten path, your job probably won't be outsourced.

      --
      No data, no cry
    15. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by esaloch · · Score: 0

      Computer Engineering jobs are supposed to increase 100% in the next 10 years. I would go for that. It is sort of like a combination of EE and CompSci.

    16. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. I think computer science concepts are going to be highly desirable in the nanotech and biomed industries, which are supposedly going to be the next Big Wave. It will take a lot of creative software to program those little beasties, and collect, organize, and simulate biological data.

      Of course, the only Big Wave right now is from companies waving goodbye to their employees.

      But I believe that soon enough there will be a definite need for creative programmers, more like researchers instead of a sweatshop good at punching out [ OK ] buttons. Of course, I'm an EE, and could use there being a few less EE graduates in the field right now....

      --
      ...
    17. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEs are about 5-10 years behind CS in outsourcing, but it is happening as surely as in the CS world.

      My guess is that other information jobs will follow (accounting, etc.) another 5-10 years in the future.

      In the meantime, we will either have gotten big into biotech, and we'll be fine, or the US economy will collapse with the loss of most well-paying jobs that generate new value (as opposed to lawyers, doctors, etc. who provide expensive services to others in the country). Most new companies are started by some clever tech kid with an idea. That won't happen anymore, since no one will major in EE/CS/etc, due to the lack of jobs.

      Biology/biotech is the safest bet for now. And if you look at Tom Knight's work (MIT), you'll see that genetic engineering can be a lot like EE and programming, if done right. Quite fun, actually, except for the lab work. Doctors will always have jobs. And if any part of the economy still exists 20 years from now, it'll be biology.

    18. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm basically a master of the Rubix cube

      It's Rubic's Cube. Rubic was the name of the man who invented it.

      Sorry about your misfortune. I had a similar one in the early nineties when the cold war ended just in time to eliminate almost all demand for my major in Aerospace Engineering. However I disagree with your recommendation that people don't enter EE or CS. If the current lack of demand causes this country to stop producing graduates in those programs then there could never ever be an upswing here in that industry. The manpower wouldn't exist to even try to compete with China and India.

      People should study whatever they are interested in and excel at. If that is CS then good for them. We will need them in the future. Keep in mind that all new technologies will intersect with computer technology. If someone invented a transporter or a holodeck tomorrow, you can be damn sure that it would be controlled by computers. Want to outsource those too?

      And cheer up, since the economy is starting to warm up again and the H1B visas have dropped back to their pre-2k levels, you may get a chance to use that fancy degree of yours before long.

    19. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by SlowGenius · · Score: 1

      If you think you might be as happy debugging people as debugging machines or circuits, you could always do what I did: start with a CS or engineering degree, go back to school later for a solid grounding in molecular biology, then move on to medical school.

      Better yet, just start with the biology or maybe a biochem degree and get a CS minor (or maybe a double major if you're really motivated).

      Why bother? Well, ignoring the possibility of medical bioinformatics for the moment, programming (especially debugging) really teaches you how to think, plus its fun. The bio part not only gives your geek brain more fun/interesting things to think about, it gives you an edge getting into med school and prepares you to survive better once you get there. Finally, the medical degree gets you that lucrative job in a field that's not about to dry up or be outsourced anytime soon: the tidal wave of baby-boomers is nearing retirement age, and a WHOLE lot of money is going to be spent on keeping them well.

      (And yes, you can do it... there's a relative shortage of qualified med-school applicants these days, and statistically speaking, somewhere around 50% of all doctor-wannabes are getting in somewhere.)

      --
      Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
    20. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by fingusernames · · Score: 1

      When I entered college in 1988, it was into the engineering program at Purdue. We all took freshman engineering courses, and then applied to our particular desired school of engineering. My freshman engineering had lots of Chinese and Indian students, and even more as TAs. I then entered the School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, to be a rocket scientist. Not as many Indians, but still, lots of Chinese. I took a number of AAE, EE, ChemE, physics, math, and so on courses: still lots of Chinese and Indians. I decided I didn't like AAE so much after 2.5 years, it didn't look like we'd be heading to the stars anytime soon, and the cold war was ending anyway, so I switched to Interdisciplinary Engineering to figure it all out, and then finally to CS with a double major in ancient history. Well, still, lots and lots of Chinese and Indian students in those CS and math courses, and more as TAs. Not so many in history.

      That was what, fifteen (OMG) years ago. Lots of engineers have gotten jobs since then. Lots of CS grads have gotten jobs (even before the Bubble). I don't think that your criteria is that great of an indicator. There have always been tons of foreign students in our quality engineering and science schools, because we have among the best schools on the planet. The Chinese sent their best and brightest to us for graduate school. I imagine they still do.

      My suggestion is to do what you like doing. Attend a real university, not a vocational school pretending to be a university. Take a broad set of elective courses which challenge you, not just the easy 100 or 200 level courses to meet your elective requirements. It will better prepare you for the future. If it takes longer, then stay for another year. Don't be one of those techies, like so many in school when I was there, who only wanted to take the 'practical' courses in their particular major, and moaned about 'having' to take philosophy, history, literature. Don't be so focused on a set of skills that will be stagnant before you realize it. A broadly educated person, with good communication skills, exposed to a variety of subjects at more than the survey level, is better able to adapt when things change, like they are doing right now.

      And one more thing... invest in your own education. Take courses periodically to keep updated. The globalisation of the economy has, obviously, accelerated the trends of the past. We aren't going to have the kind of run our parents had in their careers. People need to be pro-active in being prepared for the day that their once high-level job descends to a commodity, because that day will come surprisingly fast, as lots of people are learning unfortunately.

      Larry

    21. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by shnarez · · Score: 1

      Save yourself the trouble. Become a Liberal Arts major, and you can manage any of the EE/CS majors anywhere, and get paid more. If the economy sucks, you can move into any other field like sales or marketing. Those folk usually have history or some other degree, anyway.

    22. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the content of your question I find interesting but the context. Who, ten years ago, would have though anyone would be asking this on a Western tech forum? Amazing.

    23. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That my friend was so fucking hilarious. I wish I had my mod points to bump you back up.

    24. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Attend a real university, not a vocational school pretending to be a university. Take a broad set of elective courses which challenge you, not just the easy 100 or 200 level courses to meet your elective requirements. It will better prepare you for the future. If it takes longer, then stay for another year. Don't be one of those techies, like so many in school when I was there, who only wanted to take the 'practical' courses in their particular major, and moaned about 'having' to take philosophy, history, literature. Don't be so focused on a set of skills that will be stagnant before you realize it. A broadly educated person, with good communication skills, exposed to a variety of subjects at more than the survey level, is better able to adapt when things change, like they are doing right now.

      Amen to that. Not to mention that those people who want to be heads-down techies tend to be dullards and almost criminally ignorant of the society and culture in which they live.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    25. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      Business.
      Learn all you can. Then learn plumbing. afer thet, start your own plumbing business. If you still want to program, do some work on OS.

      If I had been spending the last 10 years as a plumber, I would be making at least twice what I currently make as a software developer.
      The hour would be better, and I'd get to go to kick ass comventions in Vegas.
      Believe me, these conventions are far superiour then comdex. Unles you actully go to comdex to learn about what might just be the next trend(but probably isn't).

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    26. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      It seems that all you care about is whether the major is lucrative or not. If that's the case, you may find yourself unhappy 10 years down the road, and that's not going to be very fun..

      Go and browse university websites and check out the classes and course materials to see which major you're more interested in. Remember, EE and CS do have overlapping interests. I know many people that are comfortable in both arenas, and, IMHO, I believe that any good EE or CS major should know some of the other's respective major's material.

      Personally, I'm an EE, but not in a traditional area (ie. circuits, semiconductors, etc.) I'm into Signals Processing, Information Theory, and Image Processing. These kinds of fields in EE are close in relation to CS topics such as Computer Vision and... Information theory. Heck, I haven't touched circuit boards in quite a while: I'm usually programming or learning mathematical theory.

      I guess my point is that in terms of EE and CS, there may not be a clean cut line for all the topics. Peruse the different areas within each field before deciding.

      Just a few words of advice, don't go for something just because it's lucrative, or you'll learn that the hard way in your senior year when you suddenly wake up and find yourself hating your major.

    27. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Are Electrical Engineers having any similar problems with jobs being outsourced?

      For EEs I don't think that the outsourcing is as bad off as in CS land, but on the other hand in a sense it has already happened to us. Many of the jobs are over in Taiwan, China, and Korea. Reason is that the employee cost is lower (as for CS) and also that is where a lot of the fabs are (fabs meaning wafer foundries). In a way, the end effect is that it has really upped the bar as far as what is required. Over in Taiwan and China it is much more common for people to pursue advanced degrees. Having that advanced degree gives them a step up in relation to many.

      IMO, if you do go into EE one of the best things you can do for yourself is get a Masters degree. When I graduated with my BSEE I didn't have a clue. Sure I knew the basics, but really that is the bare minimum. Only after grinding through a MSEE for a couple extra years did I get some understanding and experience (I was lucky that my prof forced me to actually build an IC to demonstrate my thesis topic - which made me learn firsthand how to design, layout, and fab an IC via MOSIS - great experience). In the process of getting a MSEE, assuming you have a good advisor and a good topic, you might even get a publication (in an IEEE journal) or mabye even a conference presentation out of it. Sure a MS adds a couple years to school, but IMO its definitely worth it.

      From what I've seen, once you are in the industry you want to start working to build up your knowledge, and also work on building up your contacts. If you go into IC design, you would do well to learn how to do both digital and analog design (very different), and digital and analog layout (also very different). Analog and digital each cover huge amounts of material. You will never know it all but have some understanding of each. You should also know how to run the different simulation tools (Cadence, Mentor, verilog, spice), layout tools, etc. Probably won't get all those in school, but try to get what you can.

      The more skills you have the more employable you will be. I firmly believe that you do not get job security from your job, you get job security from your skills. I always try to keep improving my skill set. My goal is to have enough skills to be a one person design center - knowing everything from the spec to the qual'ed IC. Of the engineers I know, very few have a good skill set covering the areas I just mentioned. I could count the number on one hand, and FYI - most are american.

      Contacts are the other big thing. The people you work with at your current company are going to be your doorway into the next company you work for, and the one after that. I know very few people who work at the same place for dozens of years. The workplace just isn't very kind to those people anymore.

      Don't forget that the workplace is cyclic too. When I graduated with my BSEE the market was crap, you could do a half dozen interviews and get zilch. A couple years later with an MSEE, I did five interviews and got five offers (part was the market turnaround, and part was the extra degree).

    28. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. Become a nurse. They are well paid and in high demand (especially male nurses!) and there is no chance of being outsourced.

    29. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't be ridiculous. Many, many jobs cannot be outsourced. Programming is ripe for it because it can so easily be done elsewhere and the results sent back over the internet.

      For non-outsourcable jobs, look for anything that can't be done remotely: medicine, nursing, auto repair, plumbing, law. And don't turn up your nose at blue-collar jobs either. Plumbers typically make $80k-100k, a lot more than almost any programmer and even most engineers. Auto body repairmen also make $100k.

    30. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This semester I'm graduating from college. I double majored in Computer Science and Philosophy. It's ironic that when I started school I thought that my Philosophy degree would be worthless and I would be doing mainly computer work. Now I'm sorry I majored in CS since the degree is completely worthless and everything I learnt in CS I could have learnt by buying maybe $1000 in books and learning on my own. With my Philosophy degree I can go on to business school but I'm sorry that I didn't major in Nursing or become a plumber instead. Actually I'm thinking of going to culinary school. Don't major in CS unless you are rich and don't need to work or stupid.

    31. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      EE unemployment is 6.7% which the IEEE considers pretty high.

      I'd go for synthetic biology. That will be the next technological wave.

    32. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This advice is terrible. Not paying attention to the job market when you're choosing an education is a recipe for unemployment. This doesn't mean to run after whatever currently "hot", but don't waste your time getting an education in something that has no future. I had a roommate once who got a Master's in Philosophy. What is he doing with it? I have no idea; probably working at Wal-Mart. An aerospace engineering degree isn't very helpful either; look at how our aerospace industy is doing. Similarly, a CS or EE degree isn't going to be very useful if most of the work is outsourced offshore.

      Sure, if you're "talented", you stand a better chance, but not everyone is the cream of the crop. It's good to be realistic and know your capabilities. Even if you are talented, if the market for your profession is poor, or heavily outsourced, that'll erode the salaries even for the top people.

      My advice? If you're really smart, go into something to do with medicine or biotech. Doctors are still making great salaries, are actually seen as a prestigious profession (engineering isn't), and aren't likely to be outsourced in the next century (even with remotely-operated robots, operations in this country have to be done by a doctor qualified to operate in this country, not some guy with a degree from the University of Panama or Guatemala). Anything involving biological research, pharmaceuticals, biotech, etc. will probably also be very strong in the US for quite some time.

    33. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that there will be a difinite need for creative programmers very soon. What you dont realize is that all of these programmers will be in China and India.

    34. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by tjb · · Score: 1

      Along those lines, I'm a former physics student (dropout) now doing DSP/digital-communications work at the physical layer.

      I started college at an EE, switched to CS, switched to Physics, left, got a job doing testing, a couple days later (after a bit of showing off) changed into driver development, a month or two later turned into an embedded systems programmer, a year or so later moved into TC-layer development (layer 1/2 stuff), and after that sorta morphed into the DSP engineer I am now.

      Life can take weird turns - I went full circle. So don't pigeonhole yourself.

      Tim

    35. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But what is it really like working on embedded systems for a defense contractor? I interned at a defense contractor when I was in college, and it was the most backwards, unproductive, beaurocratic work environment I've ever seen. It really gave me a bad taste for anything defense-related.

    36. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      aHEM:

      http://www.rubiks.com/

      Sorry, but when you correct someone else and you're also wrong, I am forced to point it out.

    37. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Business. Learn all you can. Then learn plumbing. afer thet, start your own plumbing business. If you still want to program, do some work on OS. If I had been spending the last 10 years as a plumber, I would be making at least twice what I currently make as a software developer.

      Yeah, but that would be 10 years of installing sewer lines and crawling under houses in the mud (or worse) to fix leaks. I've never been a terd-herder myself; I'm an electrician. But I have to go into the same places plumbers do, only I don't have to deal with effluvia. My job isn't so great, so I imagine plumbing is probably worse. I don't think plumbers make enough for the crap (both literal and figurative) they have to deal with.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    38. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you post this exact same troll about 3 days ago when this topic came up?

    39. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1
      (this post is directed at the original poster and not the above poster)

      I can't believe this guy got modded funny... people on slashdot must have screwed up emotions...Anyway...

      This person's advice is VERY GOOD. I have very similar thoughts (I graduated a few years ago in Canada--so it's similar (except schools costs were nowhere near $150k)).

      I really don't see the computer field picking up. Unlike some who say there will be an upswing in the future, I doubt it. It is contrary to my understanding of capitalism (admittedly I'm not a capitalist) for an upswing to occur. If an industry is "lost" it will be lost forever. Just look at hardware manufacturing (Taiwan/China/etc), textiles (Latin America, Asia), etc. If there IS an upswing (I don't think so) then it will probably occur in hundreads of years. For instance, if hardware manufacturing (eg. memory, chips, etc) were to be relocated back to USA, I can only see it happening in 50 or 100 years. There is no way it will happen in the next 50 years!

      Just like how the poster above would not go into this field if a Genie gave him a choice, I wouldn't either. I love computers but it was a terrible choice for me. If I can re-live my life, I would go into social science. Not because I can get a better job but because I feel that I can do something in that field :)

      Having said all this, you should keep something in mind. The computer field is still BETTER than many other fields. There are still WAY MORE jobs in computer engineering than say civil engineering or chemical engineering. You still have a greater probability of getting a job in your field (or any decent unrelated job) than if you are a physics or chemistry graduate. Or look at how many people in arts get jobs. BUT just keep in mind that you are not "guaranteed" to get a job. It isn't like the 70's, 80's, and 90's. The computer field is just like, say, physics is. That is to say, only a small number of the people who graduate from physics get any decent jobs. The vast majority don't. If you don't believe me, check out the graduate hiring rates (it'll be available in your school, or on the internet). Physics graduates do get jobs. But you either have to be REALLY GOOD, or be REALLY LUCKY. If you think you are amazing in the computer field, you should probably stick with it*. IF NOT, you have two choices:
      1. Pick something you like: You can choose to go into a field that you TRULY love. If you really love studying ancient civilizations, maybe anthropology is best. Or if you love thinking, and asking questions about the meaning of life, meaning of love, etc, philsophy is for you. And so forth. With this path, you will make no MONEY. Chances of you getting a "decent" job are slim. However, you will study something that you love and it will stay with you FOREVER.
      2. Attempt to predict trends: With this path, you can try to predict job trends for the future. It's risky but the payoff is high. If you think a particular field is going to have a boom** in the future, you can try going into it. If someone went into the computer field in the early 90's, they were rolling with money by the 2000's. So, some sector will do well in the future. Some people say biomedical/biology/genetics/etc is that but I have no strong opinion on this. You can try to predict the sector and try to get a degree in that field.

      So the choice is yours. I hope that gives you some idea. Everything is just my opinion. Do not base your life on others'; but listen to them...

      * Although, if you are really good in computers, you should perhaps consider starting your own business. If you have a really great idea, find some like-minded individuals with other skills (say marketing/sales) and see if you can go somewhere. Of course, this depends on if you have unique great idea, and if you can find the right people to complement you, and so on.
      ** It is my view, similar to Karl Marx, that capitalism is based on booms &

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    40. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If the current lack of demand causes this country to stop producing graduates in those programs then there could never ever be an upswing here in that industry.

      There will not be an upswing in the industry (in countries like USA). It is my view that upswings don't occur under capitalism (I don't support capitalism though). For instance, has there been an upswing in manufacturing (which has been declining)? How about say semiconductor manufacturing (which largely went to Taiwan, etc)? I don't think there will be an upswing in the computer field any time soon (at least not within 50 years*).

      What I am saying is partially supported capitalists as well. You always hear the capitalists urging people to innovate (i.e. create a new industry). This implies that even the capitalists don't see any future upswings. That's why they are calling for new industries to be created.

      The manpower wouldn't exist to even try to compete with China and India.

      USA will not be able to compete. This is basic capitalism. Assuming you have free markets, the countries with the absolute or comparative advantage will always "dominate". If someone in China, for example, can produce a computer with lower costs than in USA, USA can't compete under a free market.

      * I am ignoring catastrophic events like wars, storms, disease, etc. Clearly if a major disease wipes out a huge chunk of hte population, jobs may be moved.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    41. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember if I posted 3 days ago but it's not a troll. Computer Science is probably the most useless thing you can major in. Or maybe it's a tossup between Computer Sciene and Art for the bottom of the barrel in college education.

    42. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by M-G · · Score: 1

      For non-outsourcable jobs, look for anything that can't be done remotely: medicine, nursing, auto repair, plumbing, law. And don't turn up your nose at blue-collar jobs either. Plumbers typically make $80k-100k, a lot more than almost any programmer and even most engineers. Auto body repairmen also make $100k.


      Medicine: it's being done remotely. Radiologists halfway around the world may be interpreting your next hospital test.

      Nursing: can't be done remotely, but the hospital managers want more education and are paying peanuts. There's a reason there's a nursing shortage.

      Law: There's really nothing about law that requires proximity. Probably the best thing that law has going for it WRT outsourcing is that court appearances require a physical presence, and it requires a strong command of English. But that's not to say that legal assistants couldn't be outsourced.

      As for the blue collar jobs, I wonder where your numbers came from. A quick check at salary.com shows that the median pay for a plumber I in the US is $32,327, and $38,854 is the 75th percentile. A plumber II has a median of $40,420, and a plumber III a median of $44,084. So the figures you quote are hardly typical.

      Similarly, I'd like know the $100k figure for auto body repair. I'm finding average annual salaries of $35k for that, and that's coming from the training schools, who frequently like to make you think you're going to earn a lot.

      Now, it's certainly possible that you could become a plumber, and run your own business and make that much. And extremely skilled specialist panel beaters could easily make that much, but it's not the norm.

    43. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by M-G · · Score: 1

      There will not be an upswing in the industry (in countries like USA). It is my view that upswings don't occur under capitalism (I don't support capitalism though). For instance, has there been an upswing in manufacturing (which has been declining)? How about say semiconductor manufacturing (which largely went to Taiwan, etc)?

      Well, I can't say when or if there will an upswing for programming, but I can say that I think you're incorrect.

      Manufacturing continues to grow. Yes, many factories have moved production from the US to other countries. But many new factories have taken their place. Take the auto industry, for example. US automakers continue to make cars in the US, and now you have plants from both Japanese and European companies making cars in the US. Twenty years ago no one thought an autoworker would have a job, as it would either be taken over by Japan or by a robot. Now you've got BMW hiring autoworkers in the US.

      As for semiconductor manufacturing, yes, much of it is concentrated in Taiwan. But much like the auto industry, it's a global business. There are fabs making the basic components all over the world, with assemblies being built from them in a similar manner. IBM just spent $2.5 billion for their new chip fab in New York, and last I heard, Intel had two new chip fabs scheduled for the US. So this hardly seems like an industry that isn't on an upswing.

    44. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Jacer · · Score: 1

      I was a computer engineer at ISU, really good program, can do a lot of the same stuff as CS majors, with additional things too. I dropped it when I decided computers sucked. I have a few friends who are CompE/EE double majors, they started getting internships/job offers their sophmore year, including government work (sick) where if you sign the contract they give you $8,000 a year your jr/sr year as well as full room and board. So all you have to worry about is your fresh/soph year. It's a good deal, if you could handle working for the man.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    45. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Become an Auto Mechanic, a Mortician, or a Lawyer.

      Amm... Most Lawyers are actually pretty job desparate themselves (almost as much as programmers).

      Unless you're planning to start a lawfirm (ie: similar to a programmer starting a software company), then you're not gonna make enough.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    46. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go for strategic vision re-engineering.

      Other possiblities may be found here.

      Any of them will be more promising than EE.

    47. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      I'm about to go onto college. I planned on majoring in CompSci, but I don't want to move aboard to get a job.

      If CompSci (or EE) is really your `interest', then don't let a little thing like economy stand in your way. If you want it mainly for a `job' (and not of any particular interest), then do not go into those fields.

      ie: Why do poeple go to art school? It's definitely not because of money.

      Best advice: Whatever you do, do not pick something that you don't trully enjoy. Most lawyers hate their jobs - mostly because they went after the $$$ when they decided on which field to persue.

      Many people have gone into CS (for $$$?) only to find that they're not meant for this field (they ruined the perception of the field, and most of them are currently unemployed).

      The great news is that if you trully enjoy something (be it something weird like art, or computers), then usually you'll be able to find $$$ in the long run. (and don't believe the rumor that there are `no jobs' out there; just about all my comp-sci friends are working in the field, and I'm a contractor on 2 projects; ie: there are jobs out there if you have the right sort of passion for this field).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    48. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Just look at hardware manufacturing (Taiwan/China/etc), textiles (Latin America, Asia), etc.

      Well, unlike manufacturing, you don't need fancy plants/equipment or huge teams to make software. That means that as soon as it becomes slightly more convinient for folks to work here, jobs will come back.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    49. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Then learn plumbing. afer thet, start your own plumbing business.

      After reading a ton of posts here, I can imagine that in 10 years, we'll have nothing but unemployed plumbers and car mechanics.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    50. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Which degree should I get?"

      Asking such a question means you should not get any degree at all. Professionals always find work or create their own work and that's basically because they do what they want to do. You have the attitude of an all too common worker and that kind does not need any degree.

    51. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Are Electrical Engineers having any similar problems with jobs being outsourced?

      Not similar, exactly the same problems. Here in Finland, the percentage of EE jobs outsourced to India and China is the same percent as the jobs in IT.

      If you like EE, study EE. Do it because you like it, not because it's easier or harder to find a job. One day you'l understand what I mean, whether you follow my advice or you don't.

      --
      Sigged!
    52. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by md358 · · Score: 1

      As for the blue collar jobs, I wonder where your numbers came from

      I think he was probably assuming that blue-collar workers can book a hell of a lotta overtime. To an extent that's mostly true - overtime comes with the territory for many trades. When I worked in a locksmith shop as a teen in the early '90s, the locksmiths made about $20/hr but talked about clearing over $80k/yr. But they regularily worked 60+hr weeks.

      Sometimes I compare that to my own job, where my salary also works out to about $20/hr but the only overtime I ever do is unpaid. Makes me wonder if I should have taken an apprenticeship there instead of going to university.

    53. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by md358 · · Score: 1

      I had a roommate once who got a Master's in Philosophy. What is he doing with it? I have no idea; probably working at Wal-Mart.

      I have some experience with graduate degrees in the humanities, and I have to agree that getting a MA in philosophy doesn't automagically equal a job unless you want to teach. But it's not a bad idea if you want to go to law or business school - more competitive than just an undergraduate degree, and it gives you some extra personality at company events.

      Overall, if you want to get a degree in the humanities or social sciences, whatever really turns your crank, go for it. I wouldn't recommend someone skip going to college because they can't think of an immediate use for a BA in Celtic Folklore or whathaveyou. Yes, it sucks to work at the same level as high-school graduates plus a huge student loan burden. But college degrees really do pay off later in life... around the time that middle age hits you can often see a clear professional distinction between those who have a degree and those who don't.

    54. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Doctors are still making great salaries

      The medical professions in this country are heading for a fall. The costs of health care are so high and growing so fast that the only long term solution is going to be a revolution in the way care is delivered. Most people feel the way this is going to happen is socialized medicine.

      Biological based research is a different issue altogether - that is an area that has tremendous upside because of the pace of technical change in the field. Unfortunately to do well in that area you are going to need a lot more education than a 4 year degree.

    55. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying these are modern demons, but compare CS to disciplines like political science, diplomacy, theology, ethics, etc. where you are seriously work

      Geez, if you had said Chemistry, Medicine, Mechanical Engineering, or even Economics and Sociology, I would have been totally with you--but for God's sake, you just gave me a list of everything that's wrong with Human Civilisation! Perhaps the world would be no worse without Sun and Microsoft, but it would certainly be a million times better without Politics and God. I may not be saving the world, but at least I'm not knocking down skyscrapers with airplanes like your list has. Actually, while the world would be just fine without any specific program, it would really suck ass without the Internet, the web, email, etc. I mean, don't you remember the 80s? They really sucked.

    56. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually its Rubik's cube. But correcting people on /. even when you're wrong is pretty popular.

    57. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a running gag here but people modded him insightfull instead of funny.

    58. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      Which degree should I get?

      Get the degree that interests you; they're about equal in marketability. Take the "sky is falling" moaning around here with a grain of salt. Yes, jobs are hard to find in technical fields right now, especially for entry-level personnel. But this happens every few years, though it has been particularly bad for a while. It will pick up: you can't push technology away, we'll always need skilled engineers.

      But I would caution you to aim whatever degree you get at a specialty. I'd look at a biology or bioinformatics minor if possible (but being in the medical field, I may be biased). The "ordinary business coder" work is going the way of the dodo. Likewise, the kind of EE work I started my career doing can be done by a motivated hobbyist these days. The fact is that as time progresses, technology becomes available to a lower and lower skill level, that's really why so many of these jobs are being sent overseas. The overseas flow will stop when it's cheaper to automate the work than to farm it out. But by then, the smart people will have moved on to a different specialty.

      Now if you want a different kind of advice on job finding ;-) Learn to be a great communicator: take writing classes and speech classes if you can and try to be socially active with non-technical people (something I really wish I had done as an undergraduate!). Most people you will meet will have no interest in technology, but you need to be able to talk to them effectively. Make the HR person previewing you feel like you're a nice, personable guy, and you're 75% of the way to getting that job!
    59. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This post seems to assume that people who aren't "talented" deserve to have high-end jobs in what's hot when they graduate?

      Look, if you have brains and dedication and confidence in your capabilities, study whatever you want. Get the philosophy degree, have fun, and make sure that you're keeping an eye on something to make money with too. There's plenty of opportunity for part-time work in fields that will make money, and by trying lots of them out you will probably find one that captures your interest about the time that the "educational" system manages to grind the last ounce of passion out of philosophy for you.

      If you don't have the brains and dedication, following the brass ring of what's hot now or in four years is a waste of everyone's time -- you're not going to make it through the interview, and if you do somehow get a job you'll still be the first one against the wall when times get tough. You might want to seek fulfillment in a less competitive arena.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
    60. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Rubic's Cube - thanks.

      This reply is pretty much directed at any post telling me to be more optimistic about the future.

      Yeah, I know there are lots of great things to look forward to. In the meantime, I'm in debt, I've been through 4 years of college and am now fighting my way through grad school, I have less than $1000 to my name, and don't know how I'm going to pay rent in May. It's just not practical to be optimistic about this.

      I can really see myself 18 months from now hopping trains with my diploma taped to by chest in a plastic bag for protection, hoping and praying that one day it's worth something. I'll try to keep it in mind that new technologies will intersect with computer technology. In the meantime, I had goals such as

      • Medical insurance
      • Dental insurance
      • Something beyond state-minimum car insurance
      • A car that isn't a piece of crap, even if it's just a better used car
      • Saving up to put a down payment on a house
      • Putting some money away for retirement

      But none of that is happening. I scored 2210 on the GREs and I'm a computer science graduate living about six inches from poverty. I'm glad the economy is getting stronger, blah blah etc. I'm seriously considering moving to Asia so that my English skills are a greater asset than my education and I can possibly do things like "not worry how I'll buy food next month".

      Those are the little luxuries I'm looking for, and in this economy/atmosphere/country, it's a little too much to ask sometimes. There isn't a day that goes by that I don't wish I had majored in business. I have to laugh out loud whenever I read someone's advice to "Go to school for what you love!" Damnit, people, you CAN get yourself $100k+ in debt learning what you love and end up broke and jobless. Go to school for something that WILL get you a job.

    61. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      File this one under the rub(r)ic "pedantry".

    62. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a car, and you're still in University? And you're thinking on putting down payment on a house already? Welcome to the real world pal.

    63. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Hehe, the parent was moderated up as "Insightful" and "Interesting", but now it's back down as "Flamebait". If "Flamebait" were the appropriate moderation for that comment, it stands to reason that among the several replies would be a legitimate "flame". Instead I've been reading some thoughtful posts from people who do and do not agree with my perspective.

      Those who moderated my post as "Flamebait" are living in denial. There is simply no way I could in good conscience encourage someone to go into computer science, and I feel that way for a very valid reason. The entry-level job market for CS could not be worse. I DID go to college to study something that I love. I'm pretty much broke, jobless, and the fact that I'm educated in something I love isn't paying the goddamn bills. If you think that's flamebait, then the simple fact is that there is a problem with your decision making skills. You have every right in the world to disagree with me, but to characterize my statement as flamebait is a clear mistake.

    64. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by hgh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to imply that a degree without a strong connection to a particular industry has no future, your example: philosophy. History, semiotics, etc. would also get lumped into this category of "useless" degrees. Sure, there isn't a huge market for "philosophers", but I imagine most philosophy majors don't expect to sit in an armchair and philosophize for a living. The critical thinking and writing skills can be easily transferred to law or business.

      I would argue that if you're not talented at something you shouldn't pursue and expect financial rewards like a good job. Furthermore, a lot of people are looking for more than just money. I would say job satisfaction is critical to a happy life. You spend the majority of your life working, so you better enjoy it. A history major that ends up curating a small town musuem might not make the big bucks, but in the end he/she lives a happy life because they spend all day doing something he or she enjoys.

      If you go into a field for the money, you'll end up living for your weekends and look back and realize you wasted a lot of time in pursuit of money, and, odds are you probably won't make big money anyway if you don't like what you do. Take the legions of people who went into computer science in the mid to late nineties because it was a supposedly an infinitely lucrative field: now they are working shitty jobs for much less money than they expected and hating it.

      Finally, you mention medicine and biotech as fields rich in jobs. Getting into medicine is a huge committment, definitely not something that can be decided on a whim. And then, when you become a doctor, it continues to be a lot of work. Competition is also fierce for a limited number of biotech related jobs; if you're not talented you're going to end up as a low-paid lab technician or not have a job directly in the field. The benefits of the genome project and proteomics aren't coming to fruition as quickly as hoped and there isn't going to be a huge boom because of it.

      If you want to just make money, consider taking up a trade. Tradespeople makes tonnes of cash, especially if you have any entreprenuerial sense to start your own business. Trades are going away any time soon.

    65. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      That's a reason why it is even LESS likely for software to rebound in, say, USA. Because there isn't any fixed costs for software, literally ANYONE can do it. It will all come down to labour. Since cost of living in many other countries is SIGNIFICANTLY lower, it will be hard for Americans (and others) to compete. If someone in India, or China, or wherever, costs 1/4 less than in USA, there is no way someone in USA can compete. Since capitalism is based on output (i.e. you get paid based on output), an American, in this case, would have to produce 4x as much to compete. This is highly unlikely.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    66. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Auto manufacturing is "special". By that, I am referring to the fact that it is heavily protected. There are all sorts of anti-capitalist measures enacted to protect it. Examples include tariffs, import restrictions, strong unions, etc. This is why the auto industry never left USA/Canada in the 80's, even though Japan was FAR better with their cars. There were massive tariffs slapped on imported cars so a Japanese car ended up costing the same or more than an American one, even though the Japanese car was cheaper to produce. This is also why Japanese companies relocated some of their manufacturing to USA/Canada--it let them avoid some tariffs. There was no reason for a Japanese company to open a plant in USA/Canada in the 80's. Some of these restrictions have been weakened over time but they are still largely there.

      Another industry that can be considered "special" is farming. Countries like USA HEAVILY subsidize their farmers. If there was a truly free market, most farmers in USA will go out of business and most goods will be produced in some of the poor countries (where costs are lower).

      As far as semiconductor manufacturing is concerned, I think you are wrong. The examples you cite are true. However, the general trend isn't there. Opening one factory here and there isn't good enough. You have to look at the whole picture. And my IMPRESSION is that semiconductor manufacturing is NOT picking up in USA--and it never will. We can figure out who is right by looking at some figures. Hopefully someone reading this message and knowledgeable about these matters can link to a website which shows if semiconductor manufacturing has increased in recent years (I think not, you think opposite).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    67. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      I have been corrected about the Rubik cube spelling myself. In my defense, it has been a quarter century since I saw it in print but I knew there was no 'x'. Well good luck on the rest of your problems.

    68. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      an American, in this case, would have to produce 4x as much to compete

      "as much" is really vague when it comes to software. ie: Over the weekend I can write an app that in my mind is `worth' more than what 1000 engineers can think up over a year.

      I've noticed that most jobs that are moving abroad are low skill programming. ie: making GUIs in VisualStudio, or writing DB interfaces, etc. Not actually building software that solves business problems. Dealing with customers (figuring out exactly what they want/need) can't be effectively outsourced. (you can't have the client ramble on a bit, and then send the specs to India, have a ready product in a few months, and have it be exactly what the client wanted).

      Also, in software development, quantity does not equal quality. ie: id Software has very few developers, that somehow manage to compete with multi-billion dollar corporations with hundreds of times more resources.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    69. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree that changes are coming for doctors. However, unlike engineers, they still don't have to worry about being out of work; people will always need doctors, especially with the aging Boomers. Doctors also have to make a lot of money just to pay for malpractice insurance, and that isn't going away anytime soon too, so that's going to keep salaries high no matter what HMOs try to do.

      As for the 4-year degree, any serious profession generally requires more than a 4-year degree, be it medicine (med school usually takes 4 years by itself), law (like med school, you do this after completing a BS or BA degree), etc. This is nothing unusual.

    70. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Luckily, I don't have to work 60-hr weeks very often in my current job (in fact, almost never), but for many, many engineers this is commonplace.

      It really pisses me off when these engineers aren't getting paid any better than those locksmiths, and then corporate CEOs are complaining that no one wants to go into engineering.

    71. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Medicine: Sure, you can outsource radiology, but you can't outsource the doctor that feels your internal organs, examines your throat and ears, sets your broken bones, or does surgery.

      Nursing: Yeah, it sucks in many ways, but as I said, it can't be outsourced. I didn't say it was a wonderful job. I think I'd take it over McDonald's.

      Law: Requires you to pass the bar exam. You can't do this without going to law school in the US AFAIK, and I can't imagine anyone practicing remotely (especially for courtroom appearances). Also, the law field is very antiquated; they're just now using faxes, and while they use computers to generate documents, it's all printed out before it's used for anything official. Law offices mail reams of documents and folders every day; some they have to send by courier because they're too important or need to be there very fast. That's not going to fly from across the world. Also, forget outsourcing legal assistants. They're the ones dealing with all these paper documents; they have to work directly with the lawyers, clients, mailing people, etc. My girlfriend is a legal assistant, so I should know. Law will never be outsourced as long as this country's government exists, since lawyers are the ones who run the government.

      For plumbers, you're totally forgetting overtime, which is commonplace in trades. Blue-collar people usually get 1.5x pay for overtime, and can rack up a lot of extra money easily. This compares well to white-collar jobs where overtime is also commonplace, yet there's no extra pay.

      I used to know a guy who managed an auto body shop, and his employees were making more than him; he quoted me $100k. Of course, again, this is with a lot of overtime, but the potential is there.

      You're right about the plumber running his own business; that's how a lot of tradespeople become millionaires. It's not that hard, because there's lots of small plumbing (and other blue-collar trade) companies, and they're not that easily run out of business by big companies. Contrast this to IT/engineering, where you can basically forget about starting your own business unless you have a totally new idea, and some capital. Any plumber with a modicum of business sense, tools, and a truck can start his own business and be successful.

      My whole point here is that our society does not reward people at all for pursuing higher education and becoming "knowledge workers"; people can do just as well, or better, by pursuing a trade where they don't have to have much education, and to me this indicates some serious problems in society.

    72. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by md358 · · Score: 1

      It really pisses me off when these engineers aren't getting paid any better than those locksmiths, and then corporate CEOs are complaining that no one wants to go into engineering.
      Too true. Truth be told, locksmithery ain't exactly rocket science and it's a lot less physical labour than being a carpenter or plumber.... the most you'd ever need to do is lift up a heavy door, and that was pretty rare.
      (Actually, now that I think about it the hardest job was cutting those Kryptonite bike locks. Maybe locksmiths have developed an easier way by now but 10yrs ago we weren't going to bother picking one of those things and just used 6 foot long bolt-cutters.)
      Many locksmiths will also become licensed electricians over the years so they can also install certified alarm systems. Even 10yrs ago they were talking about eventually installing biometric scanners. That's one profession that's not going to be outsourced in the near future.

    73. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      My point has nothing to do with USA. My view is an argument against capitalism, and the notion of "free trade". I'm just going to use USA as an example below, with China/India acting as counterbalance. I have nothing against China or India, and have nothing in favour of USA (I even get labelled anti-American, although that's for econopolitical reasons :) ). You can use whatever two countries you want.

      "as much" is really vague when it comes to software. ie: Over the weekend I can write an app that in my mind is `worth' more than what 1000 engineers can think up over a year.

      What you are saying is only true for a tiny fraction of the cases. There ARE some people/companies/whatever that are much better than others. These people are the best out there (on the whole planet). You may be one such person--or you may not. What matters is the situation faced by the majority. For the VAST majority of people in, say, USA, they cannot compete with low-cost countries. Overcoming wage differences of 3x or 4x will be too difficult.

      When the differences are 3x or 4x, you just cannot compete. Your cost of living is VERY HIGH compared to these countries. Assuming that cost of living does not equalize (I don't think they will), you will be at significant disadvantage.

      I've noticed that most jobs that are moving abroad are low skill programming. ie: making GUIs in VisualStudio, or writing DB interfaces, etc. Not actually building software that solves business problems.

      First of all, the vast majority of jobs are in what can be called low skill programming, basically maintenance and support. For every architect, there are probably 50 support, testing, and maintenance people. Yes, these are the lowest of the low. But these fields employ the vast majority of the people. These people are the most important. The top ones are not, because there are so few of them. It's kind of like saying how the upper classes don't matter but the middle class does. One says this, not because the middle class is better off than the upper class, but because the middle class has the largest number of people. Similar thing here. The majority of people are in support roles and things like that.

      Second, there is nothing stopping someone from another country from being as good (or even better) than you. Unless you are a racist, or have a superiority complex, you cannot really conclude that Americans (for example) are better off than, say, the Chinese or the Indians. US schools are better, etc but these other countries aren't bad either. I mean, you are talking about two countries with massive populations, and countries that have independently (for the most part) developed nuclear weapons, launched satellites, and so forth. The point is not the nuclear weapons (I'm against them), but that people throughout the world are pretty equal. If you can do something, I'm sure someone in China can too. So the day will come when higher level jobs are moved too.

      Also, in software development, quantity does not equal quality. ie: id Software has very few developers, that somehow manage to compete with multi-billion dollar corporations with hundreds of times more resources.

      iD software isn't as great as you imply. The larger companies (I imagine EA and others), produce many more games. Divisions of EA sports, for example, can pump out one new game each year, whereas iD takes 2-3 years. Other small companies comparable to iD, say Blizzard, are similar in size. Don't get me wrong: iD software is one of the top computer game companies out there (respect to John Carmack). But so what? EA, with its repetitive and quesionable quality, makes money too. I'm not saying quality doesn't matter; just that it isn't as big of a difference as you say. In any case, going back to my original point, only a few talented people are like that. The rest of the population isn't. Maybe you are talented. But if 90% of the rest of the population isn't doing so well, you are going

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    74. Re:EE Majors still worth anything? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll agree with pretty much most of what you're saying... except the world can handle only so many `developers', and it seems US has reached a limit a few years ago. So lets say India/China produce 10x more developers who are 10x better, etc., still, most of them will be unemployed (even if they're dime a dozen).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  23. But is India WillingTo Have Them? by divvy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Perhpas people are even willing to move offshore than lose their respect and work at BKs or McDonalds. But is India really willing to take them in?

    Indian Culture is much different from the American one. Such migration might not help at all.. considering that the Americans will have tough time adjusting to the culture in the first place. Moreover, given India is such a big country, many companies would rather do with a talented Indian who understands the work culture and how businesses are run rather than a foreigner.

    1. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by tealover · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would imagine they would be hiring Westerners for precisely the same reasons that American or European companies hire Chinese, Japanese or Indian people: To help them do business with Chinese, Japanese and Indian companies/countries.

      There would certainly be an advantage for an Indian company that does business with an American company to have Americans on the inside schooling them on how things work.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    2. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 1

      Indian Culture is much different from the American one. Such migration might not help at all.. considering that the Americans will have tough time adjusting to the culture in the first place
      Remember Indian's face the exactly same cultural problems when moving to US, only in reverse.

    3. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by divvy · · Score: 1
      What we saw was talented programmers moving to the west and adjusting to it. But the west was a 'better' place to work in.. in the sense infrastructure was in place, political connections don't work there.. unlike in India.. and anyways the west was a 'developed' one. People actually value you for your talent and ideas. But I do not think it is so in India... not yet atleast.

      Yes as somebody said, the toilets may stink, the people may cheat, the electricity might not be there all the time, and sometimes the air conditioners will not work.. we are talking about moving to a developing nation.. which means not everything is fine there as it was in U.S. It requires a lot more adjustment than wat an Indian programmer had to undergo when he went to U.S. Atleast in U.S they speak a language that an Indian can understand, but in India they will speak a language that an American will not understand (Hindi).

      Moreover, with regard to having americans on board to teach them american culture, i think we are talking about consultancy here.. and I do not think there will be too many openings for that position. After all, one consultant per firm would be the maximum companies would want to have (given they are all new and growing).

    4. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      Indian Culture is much different from the American one. Such migration might not help at all.. considering that the Americans will have tough time adjusting to the culture in the first place.

      The trick is to marry a very ugly woman and demand an exorbitant dowry afterward. Then threaten to douse your bride with oil and set her on fire until her family pays you the money. Yes, Americans might have trouble fitting in but I think Italians and Brazilians would adjust quickly.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    5. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if this gets enough attention I'm sure Bush can just bomb the Indians into becoming more like America.

    6. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Atleast in U.S they speak a language that an Indian can understand, but in India they will speak a language that an American will not understand (Hindi).

      That's because of the little known phenomenon that most English words happen to phonetically have some meaning in hindi. So when you say,

      "Hey! That module you just wrote sucks Moon rocks!"

      it might come across in hindi as:

      "Dung! That elephant you just had nasal sex with is at the door and wants in!"

      But when the programmer replies to you,

      "I deny ever knowing an elephant named Lala! You can't prove it was me! I was at... the Curry Raj Restaurant when she had sex!"

      it will just sound like gibberish in English.

      Eventually the Indian will learn to muddle through in English, although with endless humorous and often embarrasing misunderstandings. But you will always be lost in hindi.

    7. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Perhpas people are even willing to move offshore than lose their respect and work at BKs or McDonalds. But is India really willing to take them in?
      I hate going through this routine all the time, but you probably have no idea just how diverse some parts of India are becoming. For starts, we have one of the largest foreign worker populations in the world, mostly as a result of people streaming in from Bangladesh, Nepal and a few African countries. There is one locality in my hometown, Hyderabad, which is a mostly African suburb; the place is called African Cavalry Guards, and is the home of the African community in Hyderabad, a migration process that, mind you, is still on going:- just as you left Chennai for a certain tropical island [nice site, btw ;-)], there are students from Kenya, Somalia and other places who come and study in Osmania University, the University of Hyderabad and other universities all around Hyderabad.

      There are ex-pat communities in Madras as well; I don't know if it's still there or not, but when I was there four years back, I remember going to this American-owned theme restaurant called Bubba's Grill (or something). I remember chatting with the guy there; guy claimed he liked it over there than in his native Baltimore (or some place).

      Which is not to say that Americans, or indeed, people of any non-Indian nationality, will find it easy in India; as a Norwegian friend of mine insists, in terms of culture shocks, India apparently is next only to Japan for international tourists. But all the same, it is important to acknowledge the fact the people all around the world have come to India over the ages to make their living, and still do so, despite fifty-odd years of socialist insularity.

      Indian Culture is much different from the American one. Such migration might not help at all.. considering that the Americans will have tough time adjusting to the culture in the first place
      Easier than you think (and this, you'll note, was in those early days of liberalisation, before we got all those malls, mobiles and multiplexes in Gurgaon, NOIDA and Cyberabad). Next question.
      Moreover, given India is such a big country, many companies would rather do with a talented Indian who understands the work culture and how businesses are run rather than a foreigner
      Right, and the tropical island we live on doesn't hire ang mohs. Never underestimate the power of the SPG mentality; civilisational servitude in these parts runs faster than anything else. I'm bitter of course, but telling it from experience.
    8. Re:But is India WillingTo Have Them? by b2b4u · · Score: 1


      Well, this was being done earlier.
      But since the early 80's, Indian students came over to US,UK for their higher graduate degrees, worked with US companies gained insight into the US/UK 'way' of doing business.
      These are the folks who are heading back. The middle management kinds.
      Traditionally the Indian disapora is spreadout pretty far and wide working under several different local business conditions.

      --
      --Imparinja
  24. PR Puff piece. by MisterFancypants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is pretty clearly a PR puff piece. An obvious part of the trend of the Indian IT lobby to stem the growing US backlash.

    1. Re:PR Puff piece. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Congratulations! You sound like an SCO Press Release!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  25. Yeah but by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is just my opinion and all, but I don't think people from the US should have to go to India in order to chase jobs that emigrated from here.

    I know that's against the principles of free trade and all, but we invented this technology, we are the ones who built it, we supported it, and now the corporations we built it for are selling our jobs for pennies on the dollar to third world countries.

    What I'm doing is changing my field, after around 14 years, because the way technical people in this country have been treated is utterly reprehensible.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:Yeah but by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      Well, if you were one of the "we" that had really invented the technology, then you wouldn't be worried about your career. At best you probably created some neat stuff that did some neat stuff, but that was hardly revolutionary, and mostly built on top of other peoples work. Let's face it, it's what most people in technology do.

      The reality is that, like most people you just chose a field that you were interested in, and seemed like a good career to pursue. For various reasons, cheaper labour, no cost software, economic downturn, it now looks like you were wrong (me too!). Maybe in a few years things will look different, maybe they won't.

      Best of luck with the new career. It's not easy to get started in a new area. Hopefully the challenge will be one that excites you.

    2. Re:Yeah but by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      Invented, no. Built and supported yes.

      It's not even so much that I'm worried about my own job security as that I'm tired of many things about IS, and job security is certainly one of them.

      I kind of gravitated into it, it was awesome for a while, but I'm disgusted with the way US corporations have treated techs, and there is no debating that (not that you tried.)

      You're right, med school is not going to be easy >:O

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    3. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we invented this technology, we are the ones who built it, we supported it, and now the corporations we built it for are selling our jobs for pennies on the dollar to third world countries.
      who are we my friend? doesn't this include people from all over the world. Hell go to any university and see how many foreign nationals work/ study there. How many researchers are of foreign origin?
      You did not invent everything.
      this has been happening in other industries. and you are making noise because it affects you.
      and oh fox news is fair and balanced

    4. Re:Yeah but by Smokin+Goat+McGruff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, techs have sure suffered! Why, just a couple years ago companies were throwing stock options at them! Somebody could have put an eye out! Not to mention the flashy cars, the comfy chairs, and foosball tables.

      --
      "There are no cool guys in musicals." -- Coach McGuirk
    5. Re:Yeah but by dev11 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In some ways, we (meaning Americans) may actually have some responsibility in this. Creating the Internet, and more importantly, making it cheap and easy to get connected, makes anything that can be done at a distance, such as writing software, economically viable. In some sense, we may have done things too well and put ourselves out of a job.

      I do programming for a living, and quite honestly, most anyone with the proper training can do most common programming tasks. There certainly are those gifted, top 10 percent programmers (which I am not one, I freely admit), but most programming is not the glamour projects, and is often tedious and boring. It seems that a lot of the jobs that are being outsourced are of this type. Programming has become a commodity in a lot of respects, and is awarded to the lowest bidder.

      This is not something new. Many other industries that were American dominated at one time, such as steel, have had similar things happen. Software is just the latest. And why should the rest of the world be excluded if they can do the job more economically? Being an American doesn't make me any better a programmer, or any more deserving than anyone else.

    6. Re:Yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful for those who really believe Americans invented all software. You trying to hit all the negative American stereotypes in a single post?

    7. Re:Yeah but by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you know why? because for some reason the technical people won't freaking orginize.

      If 60% of the softwar engineers, and IT personal orginized, I garuntee you it would END overseas outsourcing in a week.
      We would have a large enough lobby to be treated like humans and not some constant on call 24/7 droids.
      That much power could lobby to have the Patriot ACT struck down. We would get the respect we deserve.

      For some reason people picture Unions as noothing but lazy workers. If that is so, why do we have a thriving Auto industry? trucking industry?

      Sure some people abuse things. Those people will always exist. Hell some non union software developer whose slack you have to pick up.

      Orginize, make a Union that has learned from the mistalke of past Unions. We're smart, and we keep the computer infrastructure, and all the computers everything relies on, operational.

      Imagine if the IT workforce decided not to go to work for 3 days? Some people say that would cause MORE jobs to go overseas. they're wrong. Why? Because we would have enough power to get laws that cause corp to loose tax excemptions if the hire over seas.
      Do this, people would get treated decently, make a decent wage, and build this country to be a better country.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Yeah but by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      I've thought this exact thing myself, many times.

      You talk to people about it and the response is always something like "Uh, unions bad." This from very intelligent people who are being whipsawed by their corporate masters.

      How owuld you go about getting this sort of thing started? I suppose one idea might be to talk to leadership of current unions.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  26. Slashdot commune in India? by stephenisu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's with me?

    We start a hippie commune in India, we would be self sufficient in terms of agriculture and utlities, living by LGPL (we do need to be able to make a living) ideals, religion tolerant, and we could try and land a lot of the US outsoursed contracts...

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by xzap · · Score: 1

      Sir, I suggest you first learn how to spell outsource :P.

    2. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      outsourse.. maybe he's british?

    3. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, I'm SO with you.

      No, seriously!

      A lot of my coder friends have actually expressed similar sentiment.

      Just don't know how to do it. That's all..!

    4. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, nice user number... I guess someone had to be 200,000.

    5. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We start a hippie commune in India...religion tolerant

      Wow, vi and emacs? Sounds like utopia to me, man.

    6. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because that will make all the difference in the world!! thanx for your post! I bookmarked it. I will cherish it forever.

    7. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Already been done. It's called Goa.

    8. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We start a hippie commune in India

      Prior art: Goa

    9. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by Jemm · · Score: 1

      Goa sounds good to me.

      Here is a notice from their Governor stating that the official OS shall be linux.

    10. Re:Slashdot commune in India? by tres · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Lion, it's Tres

      You still using the speajeasy account?

      Sorry for the OT, haven't been able to contact you, taoriver is not serving mail & I can't fine your phone number.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
  27. First I'd heard of the Myth.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    I can honestly say it was the first I'd heard of a 'Myth that you can't go to work in India'.

    I've had a couple of friends go to work in India from the UK in the last couple of years and their work visas and in one case naturalisation was all worked out in a timely manner.

    Does this myth only pertain to the United States perhaps?

    I can see that moving to work in India could have some instant financial benefits in that the cost of living (and therefore making a home) in India is presumably less than western nations and I understand that income tax is quite reasonable.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by tealover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What happens when you want to move back to the UK? You've spend a better part of your best wage-earning years making Indian wages. When you sell your Indian home and convert it to pounds, what kind of home can you buy when you move back to London?

      I can see people working in India for very short periods of time, but moving from a 1st world nation to a 2nd or 3rd world nation (at least in terms of wages) does not have the same benefits as the reverse situation does.

      For now, I take articles like this as anecdotal at best. Certainly it is not indicative of a viable trend for the majority of people.

      --
      -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    2. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Does this myth only pertain to the United States perhaps?

      I live in the US, and it's the first I've ever heard of it - and I was recently offered a job there to teach computers there, and my sister went to school there.

      Not sure about the UK (which of course has closer ties to India), but moving to India would be like moving to Samoa for most people - they wouldn't really consider it, and don't have any impression about how hard or not it is to work there. I don't know how that gets elevated to "myth."

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Six of the Samoan Islands are US territory, like Puerto Rico. You can go there as the employee of an American company, draw mainland wages plus remote assignment bonuses and live in a tropical paradise where the cost of living is peanuts. That means that if you play your cards right you can come home and be worth far more than if you stayed, having put your entire salary away.

      Anyone who doesn't take a year or two in Somoa if given the chance is nuts.

      KFG

    4. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      It was a myth made by people who felt hurt by the outsourcing, it was just a convenient reply. The dialogue would go like this:

      "They're outsourcing all the programming jobs to India! I can't get a decent job anymore."

      'That's oh-so-holy free trade for you.'

      "It's not! They keep their currency artificially low so we can't compete."

      'Then, why don't you move to India?'

      "I would, but they don't like foreigners there, and it's almost impossible to emigrate and get one of those jobs because they keep them to their own people."

      Please note, this is a generalization. But that was a fine paraphrase of at least one back and forth I've seen and very similar to many more. I myth to allow, *ahem*, outsourcing of blame, but also to keep faith in some concept of free trade.

    5. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does this myth only pertain to the United States perhaps?
      Perhaps the myth only exists in the mind of the person who posted this story. As for "busting the myth", I don't see any real evidence presented in either of these stories to back up their claims. Just to be clear, it appears that they are claiming that (a) it is easy for westerners to find jobs in, and move to India; and (b) many westerners are in fact moving to India to find work. I suspect that the stories are just plants by Indian recruiting firms attempting to encourage more westerners to utilize their services.
    6. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by fingusernames · · Score: 1

      Being from the UK, it may also have to do with that Commonwealth thing (you know, the last vestige of the British Empire). Is movement among those Commonwealth nations made easier?

      Larry

    7. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      I think it somewhat parallels 'moving from an expensive state to a less expensive state.'

      I sold a two bedroom townhouse in Minnesota (it wasn't a 'nice' townhouse and it was out in a third fringe suburb, not downtown) and for exactly the same price got a 100 year old house on five acres in rural Indiana. There aren't the same jobs here but there's a livelihood. We get by and live 'the good life' have five acres of land to putter around on, and I'm a five minute bicycle ride from a nice small 'college' town. And a twenty minute drive from the mall, thought I'm not mall-inclined for the most part.

      You don't necessarily have to 'move back' to the UK. Ever.

      --
      ---
    8. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by rking · · Score: 1

      I can honestly say it was the first I'd heard of a 'Myth that you can't go to work in India'.

      I'd call it propaganda rather than myth, but it gets at least a few mentions in most Slashdot stories that cover outsourcing.

    9. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      If he stayed in London, he'd never be able to afford a house to sell. A house in India and a comfortable lifestyle is better than renting a rundown bedsit in the outer suburbs of London for the rest of your life.

    10. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think the thought process goes something like this:
      1. Would never dream of moving to India
      2. Get laid off, job outsourced to India
      3. Direct anger at Indian programmers
      4. I don't like them, therefore they don't like me
      5. They don't like me, therefore even if I wanted to they'd never give me a visa
      6. Tell all friends about bigoted Indians that take your job away and won't let you go to India to get it back
      7. ...
      8. Profit?
    11. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Is movement among those Commonwealth nations made easier? It used to be, but not really any more. UK's attention is focused on the EU now and most of the ex-colonies stopped giving preferential treatment to immigrants from the UK in the 1970's. Even then it was probably only those colonies with a history of large scale European immigration (NZ, Australia, Canada) that were making it easy for Brits to immigrate.

    12. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Regardless of where I move *to*, why on earth would I wan't to come back to this place??

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    13. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Just for the record (from family experience) It's extremely hard and very expensive to move to Australia.

      I believe visas start at around AUD$4600.

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    14. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about work permits, then the company that is hiring you normally pays any fees. But that sounds a little high, more like what an "immigration consultant" would charge than the actual fees the government charges.

    15. Re:First I'd heard of the Myth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your statement is based on the assumpton that current world powerstructures will remain intact.


      Given the strong acedemic exellence of India and the current business trends, there will be less of a need for Indian companies to compete on price in the future and more of an oppurtunity to leverage their competence advantage, thus making India a stronger and stronger economy.


      Your racist and backwards remarks on 1st world and 3rd world etc show that you have not grasped that poverty in the future will not be confined to nations but will be a fate of the unsuccessful, lazy and unskilled, regardless of creed, race and nationality. A truely equal world based on merits.


      Given that Indians today sometimes have to be vastly superior in order to be considered equals in the west, and when the tide turns, what will your competitive advantage be then?

  28. It's no H1B.. by psycho_tinman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, you may have a job. But you have to reconcile yourself to a lower quality of life in India. It may cost less to live there, but at the same time, there are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there. The standards for judging things are far different from life in the West.

    PhD and MSc workers are relatively thick on the ground there, especially in Engineering disciplines. The way things are in India, a lot of people (yes, I have many indian friends) want to move out due to competition from their peers, and difficulty in finding jobs. With this in mind, it's easy to understand why one article openly states that a main reason for hiring Europeans is to "represent their interests" in the home country.

    When you go work in India, you may save some cash, for sure.. but if you don't plan on living there for the rest of your life, when you come back to your own country, you will find that the savings don't necessarily translate to much in your local currency.

    Does all this sound like I am against people moving to India ? not at all. Just that, as the title of my post suggests, I doubt we're ever going to see a vast inrush of Europeans/Americans working in India at low level positions. Indian companies may be savvy enough to snap up a few qualified and experienced personnel, but for the greater majority of those out of work, India isn't the answer. There is a reason why there are STILL so many Indian workers in Silicon Valley and other technology hubs.

    1. Re:It's no H1B.. by radixvir · · Score: 2, Funny

      here are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there.

      like maybe having your parents ship you a burger in the mail once in a while

    2. Re:It's no H1B.. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When you go work in India, you may save some cash, for sure.. but if you don't plan on living there for the rest of your life, when you come back to your own country, you will find that the savings don't necessarily translate to much in your local currency.

      Savings? Slashdotters will spend it all on game boxes, pizza, beer, and anti-SCO donations.

      What? No pizza in India? I'm out!

    3. Re:It's no H1B.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There're Pizza Huts in some major cities

    4. Re:It's no H1B.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being homeless in the USA is better then living in India

  29. It's not peanuts by etymxris · · Score: 1

    And yes, they are doing it. I know one in particular, who was laid off here in America and then rehired to work in India as the head of the outsourced division. Certainly he's not making what he made here, but when, for example, a haircut and head massage are mere (US) pennies, it doesn't matter much.

    1. Re:It's not peanuts by geekoid · · Score: 1

      yes, but what percentage are those pennis to his income? how much is housing?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Constitutions by tepples · · Score: 1

    There oughtta be a law! To stop bad laws. An antilaw if you will.

    Laws to restrict the actions of legislatures are called "constitutions." They do so by having a much more difficult amendment process than ordinary statutes. However, courts seem to have been ignoring the ninth and tenth articles of amendment to the U.S. Constitution recently by considering nearly every act that the Congress passes "necessary and proper" "to regulate commerce ... among the several States".

    They will come in card form.

    Here's such a card.

    1. Re:Constitutions by theRiallatar · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't get the joke, it's from Final Fantasy Tactics Advance. Each battle has certain laws, like "no swords" or "no fire spells" or what have you, and there are anti-law cards you can play to nullify those laws. Hence, why it's so funny...

    2. Re:Constitutions by dirgotronix · · Score: 1

      I got it.

      I think everyone else here is taking things a bit too seriously.

      --
      America - Home of the scapegoat, land of the Corporation
    3. Re:Constitutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is not funny. You sad nerd bastards.

  31. Mogadishu or Bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah India is so 2003, the real opportunities to live cheap are in Mogadishu, Afganistan, and Iraq.

    My plan is to get an old VW bus, and just follow the armies around - you can live on peanuts in ex-war zones.

    And from the looks of things, there's going to be no shortage of war-zones over the next ten years...

    1. Re:Mogadishu or Bust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there. Done that.
      Certainly a dollar a day goes a long way. And the other advange is less calling of annoying clients asking for this and that.

      Though be sure to bbring extra batteries, power outages can effect your programming efforts if they are to long.

  32. India is a horrible, dirty, corrupt place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I was forced to go to India, I wouldn't go to the bathroom the entire trip.

    That's one way to do it. On the other hand, if I was forced to go to India again, I would take the quick way out and attack the submachine gun-carrying guard at Delhi airport. Death, grant me your sweet release!

  33. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  34. not necessarily a good idea. by tloh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Won't argue with the job opportunities available in places like India and China, but careers aside, are those really suitable places to live for people who've grown up in western environments like the US?

    Last I heard India is still a developing country in many aspects. How may are prepared to share the road with not only automobiles and pedestrians but elephants, sacred bovines, and pack animals which all produce fair shares of manure? Depending on where in india one might relocate to, problems with roaming bands of monkeys and the ocassional wild tiger, rare as they are, would still be unsettling for one who only see beasts in zoos.

    Though China has come a long way from the 60s and 70's, My parents still carry lasting scars from the exesses of the Cultural Revolution. There are still many things that should/could not be addressed in public without considerable risks to the speaker and the listeners. Despite the incredable westernization/commercialization of the general population, China is still very ethnocentric in some regards. In short, American $$$$$ == good, dragonboats, home-grown rockets & national astronauts == better. I'm optimistic about the direction China is headed but I highly doubt it is a suitable place for a western job seeker unless (s)he is willing to make considerable lifestyle and mental adjustments.

    just my 2 cents.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by g0qi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Developing country? Sure. But by no means do elephants and "pack animals" roam around and share the roads. Yes, we did make some progress in the last 2000 years. And no, we don't locate our programmers deep inside our jungles.

      And dude, China is communist. India is not. There's a big difference.

      Just my 2 rupees.

      --
      Yea. I know.
    2. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello racist!

    3. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You seem to be a chinese origin person, so whatever you say about china may be right, and I will not argue.

      But, puhleese, don't spout ignorant statements about India like roaming tigers on streets in cities.

      Another thing to remember is that India already is a mixed race society, with all shades of the color variations and features from north to south. So, being a puralistic democracy who does not suppress its citizens, are used to living with "different" looking people, free press etc. westereners will have a easier time adjusting.

    4. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by estergum · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You would expect to move to another country and not make lifestyle and mental adjustments????

      The can be surprising cultural differences even between western countries.

      I was stunded by the number of beggers in the US when I worked there, in San Francisco at least.
      That and the feet police, in NZ its quite common to strop about in bearfeet. I all most got arrested in a mall because I wasn't wearing shoes.

    5. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm....

      Bare feet.. New Zealand... Stropping about...

      Sir, are you, by any chance, a ..... Hobbit?

    6. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If India is so tolerant how come you guys burn trainloads of muslims alive while your police force looks on. Lets not forget about the "untouchables" The persecution of Christians and all of the ethnic violence, and yes you do let all kinds of animals roam the streets. I saw a news program recently about a problem with mokeys attacking people in what seemed to be a pretty urban area.

    7. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      are those really suitable places to live for people who've grown up in western environments like the US?... Last I heard India is still a developing country in many aspects. How may are prepared to share the road with not only automobiles and pedestrians but elephants, sacred bovines, and pack animals which all produce fair shares of manure?

      Sounds just like a pack of SUVs to me.

      Anyhow, there are a wide variety of living conditions in India. I hear you can get away from the poorer areas, but you are going to pay more. Whether it will be more than your salary can bear, I don't know. Maybe room up with some other ex-US-techies. If you don't have a family and like to travel and explore new cultures and new places and don't mind a little risk and unpredictability, go for it!

    8. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by 0WaitState · · Score: 1

      and the ocassional wild tiger, rare as they are, would still be unsettling for one who only see beasts in zoos.

      Dude, those of us living in and around Silicon valley have to deal with mountain lions, which like tigers will also bite off your head at about the same frequency as that of buying a winning supper-lotto jackpot ticket. Take your troll elsewhere, munchkin.

      --

      Remain calm! All is well!
    9. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      China is communist? When did that happen?

      I'd have thought the last few people clinging to the Chinese communism myth would've dropped it when the Party Congress adopted amendments to the constitution entrenching private property rights.

      No, no--China is, as China has always been--an authoritarian oligarchy. That it had socialist pretensions for some small part of its history in no way makes it socialist or communist in any meaningful sense.

    10. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by pamri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Unless you are trying to be another Jim Corbett, you are unlikely to come across even a monkey,forget an elephant or a tiger (???) if you are applying for an executive's job in any of the metro's or urban areas. Of course, cows are there, but nowadays found only in gully areas or residential areas. FYI, I am living in Bangalore for the present and I have contacts with a number of "foreigners", both within my organisation or those visiting it and have yet to find someone who finds the problems you mentioned a reason to leave their jobs here. The person heading the Organisation sharing our office premises has been in Bangalore for around 20+ years and is originally from UK and he not only is v.comfortable, but has mastered the local language quite well. And yes, I am yet to see a sparrow near my house/place of work and come across a cow, only when i take a walk near my house. And economic liberalisation has meant, most upper & middle class attitudes & lifestyles, around the world are more or less the same (ie., good education, a good house in a nice surrounding, good social life, having good spending power,etc.,)

      I am not saying, there won't be any problems in relocation, but rather that some of them may be due to stereotypes you have developed(in your case, seeing a wild tiger) and some could be ignored (seeing cows all around), if your job is challenging or satisfactory enough and you could manage to have a decent lifestyle.

      Some links:
      Myths about Indian Business women
      Outside execs who have succeeded in India

    11. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Last I heard India is still a developing country in many aspects.
      ---
      *Many* respects.

      How may are prepared to share the road with not only automobiles and pedestrians but elephants, sacred bovines, and pack animals which all produce fair shares of manure?
      ---
      Okay, that's just horse-shit. There aren't elephants roaming the streets of the major cities. Perhaps the worse drivers in the world (hm, maybe not as bad as those in Bangkok...) but no elephants. Or pack animals. Lots of carts, bicyles, and other people-powered devices, though.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      You make an excellent point. The middle and uppler classes in India are pretty well off, there is just (relatively) fewer of them than in the United States. For those with money, life is quite comfortable, if different from how it is in the US.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your last paragraph points out something very important. When you leave liberal societies, you are leaving your freedoms. That is the most important thing. Things like standard of living, etc can be adjusted. But freedoms are something else. Most countries, including India, offer few freedoms. India is nothing more than a kleptocracy, with Hindu fundamentalist tendancies. You are talking about a country where kissing on film (movies) is largely banned, all films are censored, etc. Some people have even been thrown in jail (for short periods of time) for releasing "controversial" films. You are also talking about a corrupt government. And so forth.

      If you are a conservative, or could care less about criticizing the government, then these governments are fine. But if you say something, watch out.

      Same thing with China, except multiply everything I said by 1000x.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    14. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Shit in the Intersection
      My career in India

      Hmmm, probably be a best-seller.

    15. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, yes about the muslims being burnt alive was dictated by the US government. After all aren't all muslims terrorist as per the Bush administration?

      Persecution of Christians?? India is a land of many religions and thus is a secular country. This sounds like some southern church propaganda.

      Animals attacks are prevalent all over the world and not just in India. Besides, India is not place where the daily cuisines reads "cook anything with 4 legs! NO MSG added". Oh wait, but that lead to SARS!! And now bird flu!!

    16. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      If you are a conservative, or could care less about criticizing the government, then these governments are fine. But if you say something, watch out. Same thing with China, except multiply everything I said by 1000x.
      At this point, this thread could become very interesting if you could answer this question:- have you, sir, been to China or India? Or perhaps, even to relatively mild authoritarian regimes such as Singapore?

      Just curious as to where you came up with this notion that criticizing the government du jour could land you up in trouble in India, like it does in totalitarian regimes.

    17. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a New zealander and i have suffered unjustices overseas in some western countries before of my 'lack of shoes'... I know others who have suffered also. We can not let this discrimination continue. We will fight for hte rights to walk bear feet!

    18. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Last I heard India is still a developing country in many aspects.

      Right.

      I think that a lot of people grossly underestimate the difficulty of making the transition from a third world country to a US-Western European level economy. Both India and China have large issues with developing the cultural and governmental isntitutions necessary to support this. China is still wrestling with problems in building infrastructure, a looming debt crises, and corruption. China's problems are so large that they are LOSING manufacturing jobs faster than any country (even on a percentage basis).

      India has similar issues - foreign investment is still small, and liberalization of the regulations that have strangled their economy in the past have only really been lifted in the IT field.

    19. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but - I don't get it.
      You don't want to see (very) different areas of this world? Experience very different life styles? Live in a completely different way?

      Heck, I moved around most of my life (you could say I'm root-less). Met many, very different ways of looking at life. And it's fascinating. Beautiful. Really opens your eyes. Extends your horizons.

      I truly don't want to insult you, but if you don't see that moving to any other country is going to mean a largish change in the way you live and see life, then... well... feel free to stay in the USA. Politics aside (ugh!), it's a large and beautiful country. Stick with your SUVs, ignore the rest of the world, believe your president, read american history written by americans and be, well, american.

      Or you could look outside your horizons. Move to a different country every now and then. Sure, not as easy. But fun, believe me.

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    20. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1
      No I haven't been to those countries but I do know about the situation. I don't know off the top of my head but here are some examples (I can't remember the details but if you want them, I can try finding them). Some examples of undesirable actions from India:

      • Some anti-nuclear weapons documentary in India was banned and the filmmaker threatened with penalties (including jail) if he didn't alter it significantly.
      • Some British Indian was charged (in absentia) for simply criticizing the Indian government
      • A politician from Tamil Nadu was jailed under the anti-terrorism laws for simply expressing something supporting the LTTE (there was no proof and even then, there was no direct connection)
      • Charges against the hindus who killed the muslims during the last riots are still nowhere to be seen. I suppose muslims don't matter as much as hindus huh?
      • Ignoring UN resolution that calls for a plebscite in Kashmir. What sort of government refuses to hold a referendum? Yep, the sort that is closer to an authoratarian govt than a libertarian one.

      Those are just a few. Those sound vague because I don't remember the details. But if you really want it, I can try finding the full details (names, events, etc).

      And you don't want me to get started on China, which as I said, is much worse...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    21. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by harinee · · Score: 1

      Hi
      I can pick up such examples about any country in the world and call the regime a totalitaran regime.Please go visit, live and analyze the living conditions before shooting out of your mouth.India has a remarkably free press compared to even most developed countries.I have lived 3 years in US and I frankly find India as free as US. Yes movies are censored to grade them they do that in the US too.I work in a software industry and have 2 muslims in my team and I never remember any occasion where they were treated differently from others.And the Indian people and press have been more critical of the riots which was restricted to one state(we have 30-odd states) than even foreigners
      As for the examples stated let me see how many people in US would be allowed to speak in support of alqaeda(LTTE killed an ex-Prime Minister of India do you really expect any sane govt in any country to keep a blind eye to backers of a terrorist outfit).
      As for Kashmir check your facts before you speak. We are fighting an occupation through the backdoor by Pakistan and if Canada or Mexico tries to do the same to US let me see how responsive US is to the UN(Well did US listen to UN on Iraq??).

    22. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven've been to india so I can't verify the scene you've painted, but your post reminds me of that reality TV show which ran recently on the local fox chanel which detailed the going-ons of a pair of spoiled rich kids in rural america. In "The Simple Life" Paris Hilton and Nichole Richie lived for a month in a small farming comunity somewhere in Arkansas. For them, dairy cows and tractors were very much a part of every day life. If someone used that show as the basis of understanding living conditions in the United States, I imagine most Americans would be pretty upset. As an engineering student living in the San Francisco Bay Area, I can truthfully say that dairy cows are about as rare as sword-smiths. (Both probably exist, but I've encountered neither.) I don't mean to doubt your sincerity, but I do wonder how much the indian tourist industry and the culture shows of PBS have influenced your understanding of India. In the context of a tech worker, are the issues you raised about india really relevent? I mean, maybe cows, elephants, and other animals may be seen on the streets, but is it going to be in places where a technology professional is likely to settle down?

    23. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another thing to remember is that India already is a mixed race society, with all shades of the color variations and features from north to south. So, being a puralistic democracy who does not suppress its citizens, are used to living with "different" looking people, free press etc. westereners will have a easier time adjusting.

      I don't believe the original poster mentioned India in a political context at all. Many in this thread seems to think china and india are being lumped together as being indistinguishable. The way I see it, an attempt is being made to give *different* examples of how the two places may not be suitable for a western-raised individual to live. I've seen comparatively numerous post in this thread responding to the portrail of India, is this hitting an unseen nerve? Personally, I'm very curious about how the whole caste system is reconciled within a society that in every other way, interacts so vibrantly at the economic and social levels in so many ways.

    24. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by orblee · · Score: 1

      However unfortunate this may be, global trade means laws across major economies become similar. Either India will open up, or the rest of the world will close up. Simple as that. The case in point is the current drug laws. The US senate would ban alcohol if they could find a way to make it work as the east coast of america has puritanical roots, where pleasure with no benefit to anyone but self is bad. The US refused to trade with any country (or give visas to the citizens of it) that didn't make drugs illegal. Europe doesn't have this puritanical root and so many citizens don't understand the laws. The citizens of Nepal used to (and still do) consume much bhang (hashish), only now they will be put in prison if caught. Afghanistan/Pakistan was the same.

      The point is, when we have global trade, wealthy countries prosper even more and can (and do) impose their laws on other societies - when it suits them. Poorer counties are given the opportunity for growth at the expense of being temporarily exploited by richer countries. Hopefully the system will level itself out eventually, but I'm not sure. There is only one way to find out.

    25. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I am not a capitalist and do not support what passes for free trade. There is very little benefit to any country from modern "free trade". It is nothing more than an attempt by capitalists to enrich themselves. For instance, companies are moving to India right now. What happens in 10 years when wages rise in India? They will move to some other poorer country. And so on. In the long term, the benefits mainly accrue to the capitalists. One just needs to look at South America to see how capitalism has helped countries like Argentina and Ecuador.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    26. Re:not necessarily a good idea. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying these countries are totalitarian. A truly totalitarian country is USSR. These don't compare. Also, USA isn't my idea of a perfect country. Even with its limited freedoms, I would rank Canada above USA (but then again, I might be biased :) ).

      My point is that the Asian, Latin American, etc countries come nowhere near USA. If you think India is as democratic or free then you have either been brainwashed by the government, or you are an elite and have no clue of what the general population faces.

      I'll admit that India has decent press. Not great but getting there. But there are MANY other problems. India would not even be at the half way point of the world when it comes to freedoms. Everything is an illusion. India is run by a highly corrupt hindu fundamentalist government. Just because you don't see any of the problems doesn't mean they don't exist.

      I am not saying every hindu out there is killing a muslim, or vice versa. BUT as long as it does happen (especially hundreads of deaths with the police ignoring all of it), India hardly conforms to a decent society.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  35. Germany is good too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard good things about the German economy as well. Some people have said that they have their pick of jobs over there, as demand far outstrips supply. However, that may only be true for engineering jobs, and less so for IT jobs.

    1. Re:Germany is good too by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but since they've remilitarized the Rhineland, they'll be advancing to the Vistula and the Channel Ports pretty soon now, and it'll be all downhill from there.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
  36. But wait! by hacker · · Score: 1

    So you move to India, taking your $40k in savings with you, and live like a king for a year or two, making $8k in salary, tops.

    Then the market in India raises a bit in a few years, and competition increases, making it unfeasible to stay there any longer.

    You decide to move back to the US, with your $2k in savings and... live in a cardboard box, with frequent bathroom trips to the sewer grate on the corner, and the food at the soup kitchen.

    Seriously, if you move there, and live like a king, and ever want to move back, you're screwed.

    1. Re:But wait! by Fookin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ummm ...
      You decide to move back to the US, with your $2k in savings and... live in a cardboard box, with frequent bathroom trips to the sewer grate on the corner, and the food at the soup kitchen.
      Shouldn't you include something about living in a van down by the river?
    2. Re:But wait! by murphyslawyer · · Score: 1
      So...what happened to your $40k? Did you blow it all on elephant rides?

      Why not invest your savings, live on you Indian salary, and then have MORE $$ than you had when you mov.ed there? It seems the "You've only made $8k a year for 5 years, so you're screwed if you try to move" argument doesn't seem to hold water

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
    3. Re:But wait! by WindowlessView · · Score: 3, Insightful

      With $40k you could live like a king for far longer than 2 years in most parts of India. In fact you can live damn well on that $8k salary.

      As for coming back in a couple of years, you will have more work experience in your profession combined with multicultural and foreign experience. Very healthy things to have on your resume.

      Finally, upon arriving back in the United States you will find that the standard of living will have only dropped further and the cost of living is less than when you left.

      Why do you think that only a year ago so many economists - not to mention Federal Reserve Governors - were sitting on a brick about "deflation". Why do you think US interest rates remain so low despite the fact that there is obvious inflation in some of the commodities? Answer: because there is NO bloody inflation in wages, nor has lower rates increased job creation, at least in the US.

      Remember, the whole point of this global trade is to even things out. That means the US drops and the developing world rises. Most westerners don't have a clue what is in store for them. They think outsourcing is something that happens to textile and call center workers.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    4. Re:But wait! by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Very healthy things to have on your resume.

      And you actually think that anybody gives a flying fuck what's on a resume any more?

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    5. Re:But wait! by WindowlessView · · Score: 1

      Good point. Sending out resumes has always been the most inefficient way to find a job. Do people really need to be told to use their contacts and network?

      But the experience, if not the representation of it on a piece of paper, will be of value to people paying wages.

      --
      Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  37. Not Gonna Happen... by Zordas · · Score: 1

    I've been a tech for a little over 15 years now and have many friends in the industry. Often when we talk the subject of outsourcing to India comes up. I doubt if many will move because of the following : 1) Programmers don't really need to be at the facility. (video conferencing, email, etc.). 2) it's safest for an American to be in America (This is the biggest concern to all I talked to). 3) Wages are WAY to low. 3)

    1. Re:Not Gonna Happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Wages are WAY to low. 3)

      Don't you mean 4) Profit! ?

  38. yarrr, girl! by twitter · · Score: 1
    ...many companies would rather do with a talented Indian who understands the work culture and how businesses are run rather than a foreigner.

    I think "work culture" is a universal - get to work!

    As for the software culture, you have to serve your market. You can bet your bottom dollar that an Indian firm that specializes in US software is going to be happy to have US culture on board.

    Company politics can play a role too and can be used as a quick quality guide. A company writing really bad code for Microsft will probaly not want any US programmers on. Why import a lack of talent when there's plenty everywhere? When you don't care, you just don't bother. Free software companies will take input from anywhere without moving boddies because they have adequate colaboration tools. A company that goes to the trouble of importing talent is likely to make a good piece of software. Indians hired at Netscape were not there simply because they were willing to slave away like everyone else, they were GOOD and so was Netscape.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:yarrr, girl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      twitter, do you really have to make your stupid point by offering yet-another-dollop-of-proof-that-M$-is-evil you seem to enjoy so much?

      You know, if you weren't so pathetic in this regard and just stuck to the facts then maybe no one would follow you around repeating the most embarrassing bits of your, ahem, distinguished posting history for everyone to read.

  39. The Indian jobs are for managers by hcg50a · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the IHT article:

    "...top-level and middle-level executives from the United States and Britain exploring job opportunities in top technology firms. This is in addition to regular middle-level and top-level management positions held by foreigners in multinational companies that have large operations [in India]."

    It should be noted that the Indian jobs starting to be filled by foreigners are middle- and upper-level management jobs--not software or hardware engineers!
    --
    HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
    11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
  40. The question to ask is. by composer777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we really want this?

    Do we want our lives to be traded as commodities to be moved and shuffled about at the whim of the free market? I'm just going to state a few opinions here. Markets should serve people, not the other way around. When freedom of choice (in this case, where to live), is superceded by the freedom of markets we have a problem. Markets are in theory, supposed to maximize freedom. I don't see how forcing a bunch of people to travel across the world just to eat is an example of "freedom". Instead, it's the commoditizing of humanity. I'd be curious, if we were to interview these travelling workers, what their response would be if they were given a choice between working that job over in India vs America. I'd imagine that they would choose to work closer to home. Imagine if we had a choice, any at all. Imagine if democracy (in other words, allowing those who are affected most by a decision, to make that decision) were placed above capitalism. Instead, what we have is the market being rigged to serve a priveledged few, at the expense of everyone else. There is nothing "free" about being forced to transplant oneself every few years just to eat. Freedom from means nothing without freedom to.

    1. Re:The question to ask is. by Linux+Thought+Leader · · Score: 1

      Do we want our lives to be traded as commodities to be moved and shuffled about at the whim of the free market?
      You are not at the mercy of the fickle free market. You are under my control, the Linux Thought Leader, and you will go to India, live in a thatched hut and write JCL for OS/360 for the rest of your miserable life! This, I command.

    2. Re:The question to ask is. by HBI · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Markets don't maximize freedom, they maximize productivity. If the market weren't driving people to DO, then everyone would sit on their ass and get a lot less accomplished. You'd have a situation reminiscent of the Soviet Union, where people had a hard time getting enough to eat, never mind other consumer goods.

      Freedom is a joke, do you think being a wage slave is freedom? It's the only way to extract reasonable amounts of effort from an apathetic public.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:The question to ask is. by aynrandfan · · Score: 1
      Please show me how people are being forced into going overseas to find a job.

      Markets are composed of and do serve people.

      Markets are composed of people, and are not the mythical beings you want them to be.

      Instead, what we have is the market being rigged to serve a priveledged few, at the expense of everyone else.
      Go back to your cave, troll.


      --

      ----

      "Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so."-Lawrence Lessig

    4. Re:The question to ask is. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine that they would choose to work closer to home. Imagine if we had a choice, any at all. Imagine if democracy...were placed above capitalism....

      John Lennon! Welcome to Slashdot.

    5. Re:The question to ask is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey moron,

      Democracy is not about those most affected by a decision, to make the decision, and the free in free market is not free as in freedom. [free] Markets are not, in theory, supposed to maximize freedom, they maximize competition.

      Yes, we do want a free market. Stop being selfish.

    6. Re:The question to ask is. by fal13n · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight.

      We are allowed to buy and sell from India. They are allowed to buy and sell from us. Indians can move here and work here, and we can move there and work there. But that's not freedom. Freedom is when our government tells them they can't work here, and their government tells us we can't work there, and we can't sell to each other without paying extra, or we go to jail. Do I have that right?

    7. Re:The question to ask is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you managed to miss the point completely.

    8. Re:The question to ask is. by esaloch · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I fail to see how making it possible to live in another country is taking away freedom. Taking away freedom is freely trading with other countries but forcing the people of those countries to live in the same shitty conditions. If people are willing to move to India for a job then that tells me the standard of living in India must be rising. I don't see it falling anytime soon either. Nobody is saying you have to move to India.

    9. Re:The question to ask is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Saying that markets serve people is a meaningless statement. It's much more important to discuss how and on what basis markets serve people.

      Markets are terrible vehicles by which to pursue an economy founded on human needs--more specifically, classlessness, equity, diversity of outcomes, efficiency, self-management and solidarity...

      Markets are excellent, on the other hand, of maintaining class privilege and thwarting efficiency or consumer choice (or, even, the meaningful exercise of democratic freedoms) in favour of cycles of competition and wealth accrual.

      The thing that makes market theory "work," from an economist's perspective, is a set of faulty deductive axioms that result in meaningless theories like the subjective theory of value.

      Rand's work, and the work of her less radical compatriots, sells a good story -- perhaps one that's internally consistent, even -- but what's important are outcomes and in outcomes market theory is more fluff than substance.

    10. Re:The question to ask is. by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      ...thwarting efficiency or consumer choice (or, even, the meaningful exercise of democratic freedoms)...

      Given that markets are composed of individuals making free choices I fail to see how they thwart consumer choice or democratic freedom.

    11. Re:The question to ask is. by TheSync · · Score: 1

      "Markets" don't exist. People exist. People have wants. They engage in free trade.

      Markets don't exist to maximize freedom. Markets exist because people want to trade. Markets were not "invented," markets have existed forever whenever people were not forced not to participate in them. Markets are part of our innate psychology.

      Granted, the invention of money, government security of property rights, and laws against fraud make markets more effective in creating wealth. But they are based in our humanity.

      We can come up with all kinds of artifical government force to make markets less effective at creating wealth. But we need to remember the cost of whatever benefits we are trying to achieve.

      The benefits of global capitalism is that fewer people in India and China starve.

    12. Re:The question to ask is. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Democracy is about freedom. Capitalism is also about freedom. The two go hand in hand. The basic issue here is this:

      You want government to take away the freedom of managers to choose who to hire.

      Its really as simple as that.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:The question to ask is. by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Very well said :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    14. Re:The question to ask is. by spun · · Score: 1

      Wage slavery is not the only way to extract a reasonable amount of effort, you just have to do something that neither the Soviet Union nor the US has done: give every citizen an equitable stake. There are plenty of small scale cooperatives, and even larger scale cooperative run municipalities (like the Mondragon area of Spain, for instance) that, although they compete in the larger world markets, have members rather than employees, and so have no real job market. Mondragon has a salary cap of 10 times the lowest salary, yet they have enormously high productivity, because nearly everyone feels that they are getting fair value for their work.

      So there are other ways of extracting very reasonable amounts of effort from people. People naturally want to contribute to society, but a selfish society breeds selfishness, and people do not contribute as much as they can, because they feel taken advantage of.

      Reminds me of a saying, "The path away from theft is called sharing."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    15. Re:The question to ask is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be-fan wrote:

      Democracy is about freedom. Capitalism is also about freedom. The two go hand in hand. The basic issue here is this:

      You want government to take away the freedom of managers to choose who to hire.

      Its really as simple as that.

      No, it really isn't as simple as that.

      First and foremost, the U.S. is a constitutional republic, not a popular democracy, not a "capitocracy." As a sovereign nation we have the power (and the duty to our citizens) to control our borders and the business and people that cross them, in such a way that we don't make a gift of our national capital to the poorest people of the world, bringing us all down to a level only a millimeter higher than the poorest used to occupy on their own.

      If, say, we were to allow unrestricted movement of people seeking work, pretty soon you'd have 40 Chinese and 20 Indians camped under your front porch, competing with you for any conceivable form of work for any pay better than the 25 cents or $1/day they could make back home.

      It should be obvious even to a moron like you that without the enforcement of national boundaries the entire world would quickly race to the bottom and be reduced to one low, global common denominator. Then there would be no one to outsource any work to the poor countries because we would all be poor.

      The Indians and Chinese are free to build their own industries, invent and market their own solutions, get creative and make a mark for themselves as originators of technologies and products. They should not be free to flood this country with cheap workers to satisfy our clueless business execs' insatiable desire for short-term cost cutting no matter how shitty the result, and our clueless business execs should not be free to deduct the expenses of exporting American jobs, at least not while we still have the horrid, Marxist income tax in which to have deductions in the first place.

    16. Re:The question to ask is. by mondoterrifico · · Score: 1

      What choice? To choose Pepsi over Coke?

      What free market either?

      Every major industry in the US (and other countries don't get me wrong) is heaviliy subsidized, whether it be through, tax breaks, tarrifs on competing products or outright money giving such as what occurs in the US agricultural industry.

      This idea that we some how live in a free market society is trotted out every time people have legitimate complaints about how society is evolving. It isn't true and never has been true.

    17. Re:The question to ask is. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Do we really want this?
      Been answered in the 12th century CE by a certain Jewish trader (from Cairo?) by the name Ben Hiju (if I'm not wrong). He says, YES. Which is why he outsourced the process of calligraph-ising ancient documents to India. That ancient job-line still persists to this day of course; calligraphy shops in my hometown, Hyderabad, still handle hundreds of calligraphy jobs from the Middle East.

      You really didn't think this outsourcing business was a 21st century invention, did you?

      I'd be curious, if we were to interview these travelling workers, what their response would be if they were given a choice between working that job over in India vs America.
      I've travelled to over two continents and some six countries over the past one year, so perhaps you were referring to people like me. I'd say the choice, really, isn't quite between countries, as it is between home and away. All things considered, home wins hands-down for anyone (unless you have been, say, forced into exile by a nepotic regime back home), although it's often fun to go to new places and experience new cultures. Takes a while to adjust to the lifestyle initially, but after a while, all airports and cities begin to look alike; you begin to realise there is no real difference between sleeping at 12AM in Singapore and waking up in Hong Kong the next morning at 8AM. Which is when you want to go home, if only to cool your heels for sometime, before hitting the circuit.

      Then again, I dont quite have to provide for a family as such, so I guess my view is tainted in that respect.

    18. Re:The question to ask is. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      I fail to see how making it possible to live in another country is taking away freedom.
      Would it make sense that making it impossible to live in a country is taking away freedom?
      If people are willing to move to India for a job then that tells me the standard of living in India must be rising.
      Or the standard of living in the US is falling.
    19. Re:The question to ask is. by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
      What choice? To choose Pepsi over Coke?

      Right. Or Dr. Pepper, or Sprite, or Evian, or Gatorade, or...

      Or to simply not buy any of them because none of them are what you want. At which point you will have created a new market for an as yet unproduced beverage. The question then becomes: do enough other people feel the same way that it becomes economically viable for a business to produce this new wonder-drink? If not, your only other choice is to make it yourself.

      What free market either?
      Every major industry in the US (and other countries don't get me wrong) is heaviliy subsidized, whether it be through, tax breaks, tarrifs on competing products or outright money giving such as what occurs in the US agricultural industry.

      No argument there. That doesn't mean that it's right to do it that way. The post I was replying to was complaining about "the market", and all its deleterious effects. You have just made the point that "the market" isn't, in fact, a market at all. It has a bunch of regulation put into it that blocks or distorts the useful economic feedback signals contained in prices. No wonder "the market" doesn't work right...

      This idea that we some how live in a free market society is trotted out every time people have legitimate complaints about how society is evolving. It isn't true and never has been true.

      That's nice. But I was replying to a post talking about market theory in the abstract, not a concrete realization. My response was framed in terms of the properties of a market, not of any given country - and I never "trotted out" the idea that we live in a free market. I happen to believe that we don't live in a free market (see above). So you can hardly blame society's current ills on a free market, can you? By doing so you are falling for the rhetoric of those who do "trot out the idea that we live in a free market" as a way to defend their privilege. If there are legitimate problems with market theory, please say so. If your is issue is instead "legitimate complaints about how society is evolving" then, by your own arguments, the free market can not be to blame since it is not actually being used (but the theory may help us understand what is wrong).

    20. Re:The question to ask is. by cquark · · Score: 1
      "Markets" don't exist. People exist. People have wants. They engage in free trade.


      While there is an abstract idea of market, which you can claim doesn't exist in the same way that a mathematical concept like a circle doesn't exist, that's not what people are talking about when they mention markets. When people talk about markets, they're referring to the complex, organized trading systems that function according to government and international regulations. True, these markets are no more physical than the concept of a loan or a corporation, but to say they don't exist is being disingenous.

      Markets don't exist to maximize freedom. Markets exist because people want to trade. Markets were not "invented," markets have existed forever whenever people were not forced not to participate in them. Markets are part of our innate psychology.


      Markets were invented. While that act of invention was some thousands of years ago, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. There are different, older means of exchanging goods that don't resemble our modern concept of a market. For the vast majority of our history, we existed in small tribes of a few dozen people where opportunities for trade and storage of goods were extremely limited.

      The idealistic concepts of capitalist man and communist man both reflect part of human nature, but both are deeply flawed because they don't attempt to reflect our entire nature. Both sharing and exchange were essential to our tribal life in their appropriate contexts. Economics won't become a science until it establishes consilience with psychology and biology and thereby bases itself on a scientific understanding of human nature instead of absurd idealistic assumptions based on tiny splinters of our psychology. If capitalist societies are foolish enough to follow their idealistic model of man as far as communism did, the results will be the same: a wealthy, powerful ruling class and a vast majority of oppressed people who will eventually bring the system down.
    21. Re:The question to ask is. by mondoterrifico · · Score: 1

      I did not mean to imply that you were the one doing the trotting out. I apologize.

      I also wasn't blaming anything for anything. Just commenting on the "free market" rhetoric. I perhaps should have replied to another post instead of yours, but yours caught my eye.

      Thanks for the reply.

    22. Re:The question to ask is. by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. Always nice to see a little courtesy in amongst the flamewars that infest the 'net :-)

    23. Re:The question to ask is. by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      The question is not, do we want this; this is going to happen because of the global internet that we [IT's] have created. It's a side effect that we couldn't have seen coming.

      The question is, how do we cope? There are emerging studies that say that this could actually be a good thing in the long run (Inc. Magazine - current issue).

      I'm kind of curious as to what people are doing about the language barrier. I would think that a lot of people over there speak English; but I personally think it's rude to ask a native to speak English when I'm in a foreign country. I try to learn as much of the language as I can when I'm in a foreign country just to show the other culture that I do respect them (except the French - for some reason they scoff at you even for "attempting" their goofy little language improperly).

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    24. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > We are allowed to buy and sell from India. They are allowed to buy and sell from us. Indians can move here and work here, and we can move there and work there.

      Not quite. Rich countries want to buy from the Third World only what they don't produce themselves. This includes tropical agricultural products, but there are lots of tropical agricultural products -- like sugar for instance -- that are being produced in rich countries, and thus blocked or heavily subsidised.

      So one of the reasons why there is immigration to rich countries, besides the refusal of rich people to bear children, is the lack of opportunities in poor countries caused, besides incompetence, by the protectionism from the rich ones.

      But immigration is so controlled that it is not enough neither to lower costs of living in the rich countries, nor to significantly alleviate the poor ones' plight.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    25. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Would it make sense that making it impossible to live in a country is taking away freedom?

      Is it impossible to live in the US? It still has lower costs and higher salaries than, say, Europe.

      > Or the standard of living in the US is falling.

      That is to be expected due to the burst of the bubble and the widespread corporate, political and individual stupidity, including protectionism.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    26. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > While there is an abstract idea of market, which you can claim doesn't exist in the same way that a mathematical concept like a circle doesn't exist

      It was easy to miss the point, because it was not made clearly. A circle exists by itself, while a market exists as a function of human needs and production. It was not discovered nor invented, except as a description for something that simply occurs when different people produce different things at different rates and qualities, as they do even in the simplest societies.

      > There are different, older means of exchanging goods that don't resemble our modern concept of a market.

      No, there aren't. It is mutual exchange, not the existence of moneys or corporations, that define a market.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    27. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Do we want our lives to be traded as commodities to be moved and shuffled about at the whim of the free market?

      Our lives (I take you to mean 'our jobs') are traded as commodities because commodities aren't being traded.

      In other words, were there real free trade, goods would move around, and people would mostly just stay home where they know do to best their own stuff.

      People have to move around because of protectionism, which concentrates richness in Europe, North America and the Far East; and because these countries are so rich they don't care even for children.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    28. Re:The question to ask is. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Is it impossible to live in the US? It still has lower costs and higher salaries than, say, Europe.
      If you can't find a job here, then yeah, it becomes impossible to live here.
    29. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > If you can't find a job here, then yeah, it becomes impossible to live here.

      Can't one really? It is hard to believe that when so many people are still trying to enter the country. It seems more probable that one can't find a job according to his (comparatively overblown) expectations.

      At least in the US and Europe one has access to training resources and unemployment benefits that are either too expensive or simply lacking in Third World countries.

      At the very worst, the misery caused by managerial incompetence and political protectionism won't be possible to keep at bay, and then rich people will have to fight for their jobs with poor people. Ultimately this will drive costs low, and /coeteris paribus/ in average most people will benefit.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    30. Re:The question to ask is. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Can't one really? It is hard to believe that when so many people are still trying to enter the country. It seems more probable that one can't find a job according to his (comparatively overblown) expectations.
      Yeah, how unreasonable to want to be paid at least minimum wage. The people entering the country quite often are coming from south of the border where things are completely intolerable. Then they work here, being hired illegally by criminal corporations (redundant, I know).
      At least in the US and Europe one has access to training resources and unemployment benefits that are either too expensive or simply lacking in Third World countries.
      Training resources? Like college? In the US, college is pretty damn expensive. Most college graduates are in serious debt, and they need high paying jobs just so they don't go bankrupt.
    31. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > how unreasonable to want to be paid at least minimum wage.

      If someone is poor and hard-working enough to want that wage, good: he's got a job, and is less poor for that. If someone is rich and lazy enough to refuse, his problem. Being a native, he will probably have better chances of qualifying for something better if he chooses to.

      > The people entering the country quite often are coming from south of the border where things are completely intolerable.

      A border is an artificial barrier, in this case keeping a few rich and many poor. Everytime someone manages to infiltrate, inequality becomes less.

      > Training resources? Like college?

      It is one's choice to take the risk or not. If fewer people take the college risk, the ones left will earn more and college prices will lower, or quality will improve.

      But even when ones doesn't get college, one still has public high school, libraries, Net access and the such, which again are usually unavailable at the Third World.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    32. Re:The question to ask is. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      If someone is poor and hard-working enough to want that wage, good: he's got a job, and is less poor for that.
      If he earns enough to stay alive, and nothing more, he's a wage slave. Because really, if you're saying "Work for me or die", does it really matter whether you're using a gun or starvation as a threat?
      A border is an artificial barrier, in this case keeping a few rich and many poor. Everytime someone manages to infiltrate, inequality becomes less.
      Bullshit. The poor get poorer, and the rich profit, and the class inequality between rich and poor grows more and more. And any improvement that those who come across the border gain is quickly offset by a rising population (and even more people coming over). All it does is erode the middle class and make our poor even poorer.
      It is one's choice to take the risk or not. If fewer people take the college risk, the ones left will earn more and college prices will lower, or quality will improve.
      Or, we could do like much of Europe does and provide universal college education for all those who desire it, and we can reduce that inequality between classes.
      But even when ones doesn't get college, one still has public high school, libraries, Net access and the such, which again are usually unavailable at the Third World.
      High school; take a guess as to how effective it is for the majority of people, and how much of it most people remember. As for libraries and internet access, it's very difficult to use either of those when you're working 16 hours a day just to survive.
    33. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > If he earns enough to stay alive, and nothing more, he's a wage slave.

      Better than starving. Once one's avoided starvation, one can start thinking about improvements.

      > if you're saying "Work for me or die"

      One has a moral duty to provide food and shelter for the needy. But this has nothing to do with employment. Real slavery begins when one depends on government instead of his neighbour.

      > The poor get poorer, and the rich profit, and the class inequality between rich and poor grows more and more.

      Simply not true. Inequality rises, for greed has become the defining value of our practical materialist society. But the poor don't get poorer: it is enhanced transportation and communications that bring the world poverty near home. This same mistake was Marx's: he thought people were poorer, when in fact they were starting to avoid starvation. The difference was that they were poor and alive near the rich, while before they died in their huts.

      > All it does is erode the middle class and make our poor even poorer.

      Your middle class is our filthy rich. Either it gets out of its mediocrity, or it will suffer.

      > we could do like much of Europe does and provide universal college education for all those who desire it, and we can reduce that inequality between classes.

      This is killing Europe. Everything is taken for granted, nothing is never done for everything is consensus, and liberty is eroded.

      > High school; take a guess as to how effective it is for the majority of people, and how much of it most people remember.

      It is much better than what is available elsewhere. If you don't value it, your problem. Some immigrant will.

      > As for libraries and internet access, it's very difficult to use either of those when you're working 16 hours a day just to survive.

      If you are able to survive, count yourself privileged. It is the first step to any improvement. You could also battle protectionism to watch the cost of living get lower to NZ or BR standards.

      In the First World, not knowing your privileges, you are wasting them.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    34. Re:The question to ask is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Figures the Europeans would give this a flamebait mod, lazy socialists.

    35. Re:The question to ask is. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1
      Better than starving. Once one's avoided starvation, one can start thinking about improvements.
      Same with slaves. You can think about improvement all you like, but it doesn't mean it's possible to do so. It certainly isn't possible for _everybody_ to get rich.

      And again I must ask: what is the difference between the specific threat, when the message is the same: "Work for me or die"?
      One has a moral duty to provide food and shelter for the needy. But this has nothing to do with employment. Real slavery begins when one depends on government instead of his neighbour.
      BS. Slavery is slavery, regardless of who is the master. Forcing the poor to rely entirely upon charity is just making sure the rich have the power to decide who lives and who dies. They've proven they will not use such a power responsibly.

      It sounds like you're perfectly happy to widen the gap between rich and poor, and make the latter into a permanent class of slaves.
    36. Re:The question to ask is. by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > It certainly isn't possible for _everybody_ to get rich.

      The current level of richness in the First World currently condemns most of the rest of the world to slavery or starvation. The idea of free trade is to enable people to first survive, then gradually to improve.

      No amount of name-calling trying to stick stigmas of slavery or globalisation or neoliberalism will ever change the knowledge that protectionism impoverish most people and preserves some privileges.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  41. Re:the burning question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to Canada.

  42. Not sure ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure about the CS experience but for sure you can make one hell of a curry after that.
    Moving in India? No thanks, I'll pass this.

  43. No thanks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather starve here first.

    amnesty
    cia

  44. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the whole reasons for outsourcing is not merely labor alone the goverment provides tax breaks and other various deals to buisnesses wanting to set up operations there. It's all about incentives.

  45. FUD by hackrobat · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    India's chances of getting nuked by Pakistan are far less than the US's chances of getting nuked by the Soviet Union during the cold war. India and Pakistan aren't equals.

    I don't mean to hurt your sentiments, but honestly, post 9/11, I can't say that America's any safer than India. The way your economy's going, and with all those protectionist "patriotic" laws and ignorance and hatred against non-Americans, I think an American will be far safer in India than an Indian is in America.

    You're most welcome to come and work in my country. Heck, my president is a scientist, and your president is a maniac! :-)

    1. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think those fanatical muslims in charge of the nukes are going to let you keep Kashmir, you're sadly mistaken. I hope your scientist president can figure out how to eradicate islamic terrorism.

      It only takes *one* person who hates India to disturb your paradise.

    2. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... and why wouldnt they use those nukes against america before they destroy Kashmir? It takes only *ONE* person who hates something to destroy it. Does the Bush family tree vs. Saddam remind you of something?

    3. Re:FUD by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      Heck, my president is a scientist, and your president is a maniac! :-)
      Whoever said that a sense of humour can't cross borders never met you -- I am laughing my ass off here!
  46. You can also try different places in the US by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Calafornia isn't the only place tech jobs are available, they it certianly is one of the most expensive. There are plenty of other states with tech industries, many on the rise, where cost of living is much lower. Now with this generally comes lower pay, but it tends to balance out.

    1. Re:You can also try different places in the US by MarkWatson · · Score: 1
      right on!

      I moved from San Diego to the mountains of Northern Arizona - the cost of living is way, way less here (despite the fact that we live in a tourist spot - Sedona).

      -Mark

  47. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Indian outsourcing stories on slashdot people inevitably mention the hypocrisy of how it's very difficult to get a visa to work in India. They are inevitably met with a barrage of people whining "oh, YOU wouldn't go to INDIA, stop it". This should shut the latter up.

  48. Welcome to the rest of the world by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Friend, the rest of the world has been commodities of global capital for years. That it is happening to people from the source of neoliberalism, the US, is merely ironic. Personally, I would like to live in Kerala: a nice socialist run state with great food and beaches. See you there!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Welcome to the rest of the world by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > the source of neoliberalism, the US

      The US is not the source of neoliberalism, because the US was never socialist. Neoliberalism is made of former socialists became liberals (European sense == laissez faire, free traders). BTW, it is an individual phenomenon, so thinking about it in terms of countries may be misleading.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  49. Academics have always been doing this by JanneM · · Score: 1

    I fail to see how the idea of moving abroad can be so upsetting. Academics pretty much have to do it as a matter of course; after your PhD, you typically need 4-10 years of post-doc positions to qualify for a permanent position somewhere (and even longer periods are becoming more common). It means staying 1-3 years at one place, then relocate to wherever you find a new position. And the way the market is looking now, you may well look forward to never having a permanent job anywhere.

    Point is, academics can move to where the jobs are, and have for many many years; what is so horrible about other professionals doing so?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:Academics have always been doing this by sashang · · Score: 1

      Some people would like to start putting money towards a house instead of perpetually renting. These people don't really like the idea of moving every 3 years.

    2. Re:Academics have always been doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because postdocs and other academics have chosen to live like shit.

      The rest of us would like to actually do well in life, buy a house, settle down, get married, raise kids, and put food on the table.

      You sound like a grad student. You'll wake up one day. It's ok. I used to be dumb, too.

    3. Re:Academics have always been doing this by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Academics pretty much have to do it as a matter of course; after your PhD,

      I haven't heard of academics moving to India unless they are studying some aspect of Indian culture, language, etc.

    4. Re:Academics have always been doing this by JanneM · · Score: 1

      I know at least two CS researchers going there for a year or two. They have some pretty good research universities there.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  50. Hate to break up the party... by laigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But isn't the current trend to move the offshore jobs from India to even crappier places in South America? It's not like the people in a lot of these jobs actually have to speak English, that's just a nicety. As long as a few local management are bilingual everything generally works out. Sure, India will keep the tech support jobs. Until computer voice recognition can run down the scripts then tell you it's someone else's fault.

    Top that with the cost of relocation, the fact that the Indian market already provides fairly ample amounts of trained labor, and the fact that as an American you are going to be at a significant disadvantage trying to work within the social framework there, and you've got a very unattractive option. Oh, and don't forget that you won't be earning enough to ever move back and not be pitifully poor.

    I think using my master's degree to shill cars for a living in the States sounds a tad better.

  51. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone actually _reading_ the article?

    No, of course not, this is Slashdot, where the USA means the world and reading articles is frowned upon.

    Well, if anyone took the time to read the article, you guys would realize that by Westerners, they mean Eurpoeans. That's right, IT professionals from countries such as Germany and England are relocating to India for jobs. NOT AMERICANS. Not THAT far west. No one is moving across the ocean to work for lower pay in a lower standard of living. We Americans may be a bit slow, but we're not dumb.

    Get it right.

    1. Re:Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, nobody reads here. People are too concerned with getting a fast post. For instance, I actually took the time to read the article before this one on Linux 2.4 vs. 2.6. I saw the article with maybe 10 comments, and by the time I finished there were about 150 comments. There is no way that those posters read that article in that short of time! It was 3 long pages. Good call on your part.

  52. Intel broke ground on a 5,000 employee building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Intel broke ground on a 5,000 employee building in india. I think it should be done later this year.

  53. Re:Myth busting--see Indian embassy web site by MaximusTheGreat · · Score: 1

    I guess you need to check this Indian embassy web site

    http://www.indianembassy.org/consular/visa_guide .h tm
    EMPLOYMENT VISA: An appointment letter, contract letter, applicant's resume and proof that the organization is registered in India are required. Duration of visa would depend on the period of the contract.

  54. OK, the outsourcing thing just peaked... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    First, WIRED predicts all our jobs are going overseas.

    Then, IHT parrots the story, and adds that Americans are chasing the jobs.

    Pheeeewwwwwwwww! My worries are over.

    Here's the deal:

    1. Americans will not move to India. It's too smelly. Plus, the Indians don't worship us.

    2. In the last few year, every time WIRED reports a "The Sky is Falling" trend, the sky is soon thereafter observed to be remaining in place, and the trend goes into a death spiral.

    The worst thing that could be happening is that the opportunists who got into Java development during the 90's are realizing that they should have stayed in merchant banking - where Daddy is placing them now - and the rest of us are waiting on the end of the upheaval to continue making more and more money.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  55. Burgers by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

    like maybe having your parents ship you a burger in the mail once in a while

    Or, you could just take a vacation to Bangladesh, where the large Muslim population means you can find beef. My brother's been living in India as a researcher for the past few years, and he gets his beef fix when he occassionally goes to Bangladesh, or goes on vacation to Thailand.

    --
    Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
  56. Cost of living != Standard of living by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, you may have a job. But you have to reconcile yourself to a lower quality of life in India. It may cost less to live there, but at the same time, there are a few things that are taken for granted in the West, which aren't as easy to get there.

    An economist could explain it better, but to me it seems that cost of living and standard of living aren't directly correlated. (I know it's not exactly what you're saying, but it's worth adding.) Lower quality of living may be true for India, but it isn't true everywhere. If it was, I might be able to travel from New Zealand to the US without paying twice as much for everything once I arrived.

    In short, we have a relatively western culture here. There's good employment doing information-sector types of work, good quality education (although there's now a student loan scheme to get people through higher education), relatively good health care (probably better than the US if what I hear is correct), and so on.

    It's expensive to travel away from here considering a good starting IT wage might be equivalent to about US$30,000, and IT wages are on the high side. It would have been much less than that a year ago, except US currency is doing so much worse on international markets at the moment. That starting amount will get you a reasonable quality of life here, though.

    The lower cost of living and higher quality of education and living is one of the big reasons that, for example, it was so economical for Newline to have the Lord of the Rings films made here, because it's cheap yet there's enough of a technical infrastructure to support it. The other big export industry is tourism, because it's comparitively so cheap for people from high cost-of-living countries to travel here.

    If concern about quality of life is more of an issue than saving up money to take back to the US, then there are other options around the world besides India.

    1. Re:Cost of living != Standard of living by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 1
      The contrast might not be as great between, say, Kentucky and New Zealand, as opposed to San Francisco and New Zealand. There's a lot of areas where there's a high demand for services -- land costs more, rent costs more, shipping costs more, average wages have to be higher, and it the costs spread out to everything, making for a higher cost of living.

      So maybe the US isn't as uncompetitive in some of these things as it might seen, because places like the Bay Area and New York are our "front face", but aren't indicative of the rest of the nation (at all).

      Not that there aren't some inefficiencies. We manage to spend more on health care than anyone else (by something like a factor of two, I think), and we get a pretty shitty system out of it. The amount of money we dump into the military -- even on a per capita basis -- is pretty insane as well, and that's pretty much a big waste. But anyway, it's still possible to live a thrifty life in the US, but people have a very hard time cutting back. Once a person increases their income, they seem to forget they ever lived on less or that it's even possible to do so.

  57. The writer is idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This should also bust the myth that foreigners are not allowed work in India."

    Yeah, well, maybe they're allowed to work in india, but they're not going to work there for $8k a year... fscking moron.

  58. B1H instead of H1B by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nuf sed

  59. How is that obvious? n/t by T.Hobbes · · Score: 1

    How is that obvious?

  60. What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the hot asphalt burn your soles? And it's uncomfortable since the floor is hard.

    It's not like you're walking on your backyard or in a farm, dude.

  61. corporate greed by PrestonM · · Score: 1

    More money that will never be re-invested in the American economy.

  62. So what you're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You're saying that they're just trying to curry favor?

    1. Re:So what you're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ouch!

      That was brilliant!

  63. Free Trade by avyakrta · · Score: 1

    Why not get the WTO to bulldoze India into opening up the labour market for free trade !

    --
    Truth prevails.......
  64. More propoganda! by ChilyWily · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Financial Express"?

    whois financialexpress.com displays:

    Registrant:
    The Indian Express Online Media Ltd (JYXCIDMQMD)
    Express Towers, 2nd Floor,
    Nariman Point
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021
    IN

    Domain Name: FINANCIALEXPRESS.COM

    Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
    The Indian Express Online Media Ltd (KYYHDIAZUO) hostmaster@bombaybiz.com
    Express Towers, 2nd Floor,
    Nariman Point
    Mumbai, Maharashtra 400021
    IN
    91-022-22884113 fax: 91-022-22044654

    Record expires on 03-Jan-2005.
    Record created on 02-Jan-1998.
    Database last updated on 31-Jan-2004 23:31:58 EST.

    Domain servers in listed order:

    NS1.RILINFO.NET 202.138.96.2
    NS2.RILINFO.NET 202.138.103.100

    surely their views must be impartial!

    1. Re:More propoganda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. fe is an Indian publication, so what?
      Wired is a US publication. Obviously the views are biased.

    2. Re:More propoganda! by brett42 · · Score: 1

      The bottom of the page has
      "(C) 2004: Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world. "

      on it. It's not like thier trying to hide their location.

    3. Re:More propoganda! by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

      True, however, I take issue with the claim that 'many' westerners are going to India and this 'news' is being promoted courtesy of an Indian paper. The evidence presented is at best ancedotal and the currency exchange rate difference alone presents a factor that makes this story nothing more than hype and propoganda - the 'softening' of the Indian image when it comes to a politically sensitive subject as outsourcing.

    4. Re:More propoganda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking paranoid Cock Sucker. Get a grip their details are right at the bottom of the page.

      Go get a job and stop bitching, cunt.

    5. Re:More propoganda! by brett42 · · Score: 1

      They aren't making extravagant claims either, they frequenly point out that the numbers are pretty small. They even have a quote that explicitly emphasizes small numbers.

      ""We have come across about 3,000 people of foreign origin in our database who are looking for jobs in India." Mr Shenoy is quick to add, though, "But one must say that it is not something that is highly noticeable considering the fact that those 3,000 people of foreign origin are just a minuscule number of 870,000 resumes we have in our database." "

      There is a decent amount of speculation about whether this is a growing trend, but the tone is similar to what I'm used to from US papers. What about the article comes off as propaganda? And why wouldn't this deserve to be news?

    6. Re:More propoganda! by brett42 · · Score: 1

      oops, hit submit instead of preview.

    7. Re:More propoganda! by dcabeza · · Score: 1

      Actually the original article appears in the International Herald Tribute, the international sister publication of the New York Times.

      What exactly is your point again?

    8. Re:More propoganda! by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

      Dude! The fact that it's the same guy writing both articles, both that dish up circumspect evidence and provide no real information except creating a myth to soften up the Indian outsourcing situation makes it propaganda. All I'm saying is don't be led astray by supposed 'facts', maintain a healthy skepticism.

      Now consider the quote that 'We have come across about 3,000 people of foreign origin in our database who are looking for jobs in India.' - "Foreign origin" can mean anywhere - West, East, anywhere that's not India - how does that account for the statement (at the top of the article) that states: 'India is becoming a major hub for not only outsourcing, but also for foreigners in search of employment'? Infact, beyond a few lines of insinuation and inneuendo, the article goes at length of describing so-called benefits of working in India - most of which are debatable (as evidenced by other comments by posters on /.). When it comes to numbers (one form of factual data) the article serves up ancedotal evidence and then offhandly self-negates it by saying how the numbers are small or how individual reasons are of a personal nature.

      Sorry man, I feel I've already given it too much attention - believe what you will, I hope you give (everything) a good shakeup before accepting it as fact :)

  65. The Rise of India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems like every second week there's a story on the rise of India in the global economy and its cost to us in the Western world. But I am worried that our thinking is being dominated by anecdotal evidence as opposed to solid data. I'm no expert but in the last hour I spent looking at the situation I've found some things that give me reason to be skeptical.

    For example, if one looks at the ISI Highly Cited website we see that researchers from Western economies still dominate research journals. Suggesting that these countries will countinue to lead the world in technological development in the near future. This of course probably means jobs for those in the industry of researching and developing technology. Just how great the desparity is, is illustrated with a few numbers:

    United States - 2830 highly cited researchers
    United Kingdom - 306 highly cited researchers
    Australia/New Zealand - 78 highly cited researchers
    Switzerland - 60 highly cited researchers
    India - 8 highly cited researchers
    China - 5 highly cited researchers

    Also if we look at the CIA World Fact Book we see Western Economies still appear to have a significantly greater GDP per capita which means there is more money to invest in industry:

    United States - $36,300
    Switzerland - $32,000
    Australia - $26,900
    United Kingdom - $25,500
    China - $4,700
    India - $2,600

    Indeed, I can't help but feel that we're overemphasizing India. That they are really the IT sweat-shops of the 21st century and while they may be master code-monkeys the chief beneficiaries of their work will be the Western world. Who will get cheap labor and services but still carry out most of the research, design, marketing and retail. This article mentions specifically significantly reduced operating costs and 500,000 jobs moving overseas, but the latter statistic is useless unless we know how many other jobs are (or are not) going to crop up to replace them and where. My post isn't really an informed opinion on the matter, but what I hope it will do is encourage others to think critically about the situation instead of getting tied up in the tsunami of pessimistic articles posted on Slashdot.

    1. Re:The Rise of India? by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I can't help but feel that we're overemphasizing India. That they are really the IT sweat-shops of the 21st century and while they may be master code-monkeys the chief beneficiaries of their work will be the Western world.

      Yeah, right. We're over-emphasizing India and China. We're over-emphasizing ABOUT 1/3rd to 40% OF GODDAMN MANKIND !

      Hell, remember the times when South Korea and Taiwan were "sweatshops" too ? Not even thirty years ago ! Well they seem to have gone a long way since then.

      Now take all the South-East dragons, including newcomers such as Malaysia, and multiply that by about TWO FSCKING HUNDREDS !

      Over-emphasize that !

      The world is going to get multipolar. US, Europe, India, China, all of them with local "zones of influence". Plus a few independent powers that will not have such zones, but will be too big to be swallowed by others (e.g. Japan, Russia).

      And the guys on top of all this, whoever they are, most probably won't look very caucasian.

      Thomas Miconi

    2. Re:The Rise of India? by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      The problem is of course that we can't all be geniuses. First unskilled jobs move overseas. Then semiskilled jobs. Now jobs that require quite a bit of intelligence are beginning to go. Life for the top 1% in a given field will probably always be ok, but what happens to the other 99%?

    3. Re:The Rise of India? by MarkWatson · · Score: 1
      I can not agree with you. 2 things:

      1. An old friend of my Dad's, Chandrasekhar (who passed away a few years ago), was a very well respected scientist (and I remember from my childhood that both he and his wife were very nice people). He had an X-ray telescope named after him, BTW.

      2. I visited India a few years ago, and I got a very positive buzz from the place. Sure, there was some poverty, but I got the feeling that 30 years of promoting education is really paying off for India. When I got home, I told my friends that if India were a company, I would buy their stock :-)

      -Mark

    4. Re:The Rise of India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:The Rise of India? by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      I imagine we're not talking about a linear growth rate, when we're talking about India. There may be scarecely anything coming out of India today, but by time it's noticable, it's probably too late.

  66. "Stand on Zanzibar" by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its a book.
    Remarkably prophetic in many ways.

    I'd recommend it in light of this thread.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:"Stand on Zanzibar" by Syre · · Score: 1

      It's a great book.

      By John Brunner. Science fiction. A real classic taking place about now.

      Some copies are available here.

  67. Define "many" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Many qualified Western professionals are moving to India for jobs." How many? Two articles; one of them has an anecdotal example, and the other mentions no numbers whatsoever. How can this be seriously accepted as a news item?

  68. mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could this article possibly get up to '5'? It's idiocy
    designed for idiots. I guess that explains it.

  69. Just wait until Pakistan let's one Rip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    And everything will go back to Europe/US where political instability is more civil.

  70. It has to balance out eventually by MrMrBen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about it. Let's imagine that it gets to the point that there are so few good jobs in the U.S., that large numbers of Americans decide to emigate to India to get a call center job answering tech support questions for Dell customers in the U.S. Clearly that couldn't happen, because there wouldn't be anyone left in the U.S. who could afford a Dell at U.S. prices anymore. Before any significant number of worker emigrate to India for jobs, the U.S. economy would have to drop to India's level. If the only jobs in the U.S. were at McDonald's, then the U.S. would no longer be a rich country, and we wouldn't be able to afford to outsorce jobs to India anymore.

    1. Re:It has to balance out eventually by Joel+Bruick · · Score: 1

      You see guys? There's nothing to worry about.

      This outsourcing trend will eventually stop as soon as we're all living in poverty! :)

    2. Re:It has to balance out eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and soon the temperature will balance out across the world and the wind won't blow any more.

    3. Re:It has to balance out eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it must balance out, its the free market!!!

      What i wonder is , is there any information regarding acceptable wages for IT jobs, i mean why does your pay have to be 70K. But the flip side of it is that it cant go too low, because of high taxes, etc. So what is the equilibrium point for a an Indian $15K salary, a $40K US Salary? And would nobody accept this? (Of course, you definitely are not working in the valley for this)

      The other balancing factor I like is OSS, why, with the proliferation and then acceptance of OSS, I can see the growing need for software integrators, and these people would work best being closer to the client, so they situated in America.
      This is something like what this months wired mentioned, we get to do more innovative (or in this case architecting/designing/configuring) activities. And, the software instead of being written by offshorers are written by opensourcers.

    4. Re:It has to balance out eventually by AngryWookiee · · Score: 1

      Yes it will balance out when most of current developed countries are just like the third world countries of today and then counties like India and China will outsource their work here becasue it's cheaper.

  71. Richard Stallman meets Kalam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    Perhaps this is why. While Moron-at-large is busy killing Iraqis for oil and the Twits in London are busy sucking up to "Sir" Bill, the President of India discusses the role of open source software in society with Richard Stallman. http://www.hindu.com/2004/02/01/stories/2004020104 231000.htm

  72. It is India takes over the World ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, it seems the West will be the slave of SouthAsia. Our U.S. Government should do something about offshore outsourcing. Besides, people in USA should boycott corporations who shift jobs abroad.

  73. what about the Indians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    (won't somebody please think of the Indians?)

  74. Language barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There isn't a language barrier in India. India has maybe 8 major languages. Most people speak 2 or 3, but there's nothing universal. The most common - Hindi - was tried as a national language briefly. The Southerners reacted rather violently, trashing Hindi signs, etc. As a result, English ended up as the de facto national language. Anyone educated will speak English. Many uneducated people speak enough English that you can buy things at stores, etc. Your servents will definitely speak English (yes, in India, you will have several servants), and they will actually do most of the shopping for you. Also, Hindi, unlike most Oriental languages, is actually fairly easy to learn.

    You will, however, run into a huge, huge cultural barrier. Cleaning your own toilet? Taboo. You hear stories where a manager drops some food on the ground, and no one picks it up until the cleaning people come by in the evening, since cleaning it would be degrading. The philosophy of the caste system is very much pervasive, and people have their roles in life, and refuse to go outside of those.

  75. India is creating jobs in the US by spanklin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Check this article out. An Indian manufacturing company built a factory in Virginia.

    Apparently, the VA location beat out Mexico to land the factory. No joke.

  76. MPOD PARRENTIA UPPISH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nuf sed

  77. Good for recent college grads by zpiderz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I for one, know a few people (me included) that are open to jobs abroad after college. Right after college is a great time to do something new and interesting in a new environment. In a decade, having global experience will be a very valuable trait.

    As for the retirement aspect or moving back to the U.S. In a decade or two India's economy will grow big enough to match many of those around the world.

    Many people think India is 3rd world, but from what I've heard about their big cities, they're pretty much exactly like our metropolitan hubs. Yeah, the rest of the country needs to catch up, but don't you think Wyoming needs to catch up the rest of the U.S. too?

    1. Re:Good for recent college grads by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You wyoming analogy would be great, If Wyoming had the Plague, Dissentary, people whose jobe it is to pick ythe dead people off the streets every morning, peole who would kill you for your beliefs.

      I am Wyoming Last fan, can't stand the place. I would live there before almost any other place outside the US.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  78. Where is your sense of adventure? by Poppa_joe · · Score: 1

    You guys are the biggest whiners that I have ever meet. I am amazed at egocentrism and closed mindedness that my fellow Slashdoters display. Why is that people assume that any other country other then the US is terrible? I say take a little risk, step out side your comfort level and do something other then whine. Go to India or China for a year and if you don't like it come back. What is there to lose? I think the problem is that people are way too provincial. Or if you do not want to go to India then get out of your parents basement and start your own business. Take risks, fail and learn from your mistakes, and you will be a better person for it. I am looking forward to an Internship position in electrical engineering this summer. I have read a lot about the culture and I am looking forward to it. A break from "American" culture will be refreshing.

    1. Re:Where is your sense of adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are the biggest idiot!
      "What is there to lose?"

      Let's see, Money and Time!
      How about the fact some of us have families here and don't wish to move?

      The way I see it is it would be quite difficult to move to India just to get a job. The culture is different, living conditions are different and you are competing in a country that houses 1 billion+. I would rather switch majors or open up my own business then travel there for work.
      Unless you have a silverspoon in your mouth and can afford to get an "experience" abroad, I do not recommend it.

    2. Re:Where is your sense of adventure? by Poppa_joe · · Score: 1

      I understand your point AC #3 and thank you for taking time to elaborate rather then labeling me an idiot as other posters have done. The point that I was trying to make was simply to take calculated risks. I am 21 years old, I have no children, very little college debt and no other obligations. For those of you not in this situation take risks that are appropriate for you; don't just bitch about how there are no jobs in the United States. In the position that I am in I can afford to take risks, and I accept the consequences of failure willingly. If things turn South, I will have enough money saved to simply fly back to the United States where I can get another job. Failure breeds success; ex. Henry Ford, Abe Lincoln, Xerox, ect...

  79. Self-distructing capitalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the beginning of the end?
    Growing up in a communist country, we always thought, that the strenght of capitalism was the massive, relatively well paid middle-class, with good consuming power. Exactly what we missed in the former communist countries.
    The worlds largest corporations, in order to make more money for their shareholders have begun to dismantle this fundamental piece of the prospering capitalism. But will the wipe-out of the consumer middle-class kill the success of capitalism, as we know it?
    How long, before the the middle-class-less, most developed industrial countries economy turns into never ending recessions, do to the lack of purchising power of their own population?
    How long, before the mcdonaldized middle-class will look for radical political solutions?
    How will it help, that huge number of the American population carries some kind of gun?
    How long, before the riot starts?
    How long, before governments realize that globalization is great for multinational corporations but destroyes the social fabric, which made these countries leading economies?

    1. Re:Self-distructing capitalism? by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1
      Is this the beginning of the end?

      Yes.

      Growing up in a communist country, we always thought, that the strenght of capitalism was the massive, relatively well paid middle-class, with good consuming power. Exactly what we missed in the former communist countries.

      It has been one of the strengths, but is not a cause: it's an effect of all the other components of America.

      The worlds largest corporations, in order to make more money for their shareholders have begun to dismantle this fundamental piece of the prospering capitalism.

      Making money for the shareholders is now only part of the equation. Bonuses, stock options, golden parachutes... those are what heavily drive business executives today. They have a terminally short term view and in the long run don't give a shit what happens to the company or the shareholders.

      But will the wipe-out of the consumer middle-class kill the success of capitalism, as we know it?

      Yes. It's already beginning to happen. Ultimately the people now being disemployed are the customers of the corporations discarding them. Fucking over their U.S. employee base leads corporations on a suicidal downward spiral.

      How long, before the the middle-class-less, most developed industrial countries economy turns into never ending recessions, do to the lack of purchising power of their own population?

      Precisely. The present jobless "recovery" is the first major indicator that the process has begun. Since "jobless" also means "without purchasing power" the cost-cutting corporations are shooting themselves in the feet.

      How long, before the mcdonaldized middle-class will look for radical political solutions?

      Unlikely, in my opinion. Look back at The Great Depression. Most everyone just gritted their teeth and suffered. Of course things, people and politics are different now, so I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

      How will it help, that huge number of the American population carries some kind of gun?

      Not a factor in my opinion. Of course you're quite mistaken about most Americans carrying guns. We don't. Many Americans own guns. There's a big difference.

      How long, before the riot starts?

      A long time, I think. This isn't Italy or Nigeria.

      How long, before governments realize that globalization is great for multinational corporations but destroyes the social fabric, which made these countries leading economies?

      A good question. Some would say, "Never." Some would say that everything is presently going according to plan. Others would say, "No, that last is too conspiratorial. Government is just a slow, dimwitted beast that requires great pain before it reacts."

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
    2. Re:Self-distructing capitalism? by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      "Unlikely, in my opinion. Look back at The Great Depression. Most everyone just gritted their teeth and suffered. Of course things, people and politics are different now, so I could be wrong, but I don't think so."

      Actually during the depression, the idea of a revolution seemed feasible to a lot of people. Read It Can't Happen Here for an example of a book that presented the fears of the time.

      Why did HUAAC have such a field day in the '50s? Because people were willing to join the Communists in the '30s.

      Another downturn like that with our currently reduced safety net scares me.

    3. Re:Self-distructing capitalism? by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

      zzyzx wrote:

      "Actually during the depression, the idea of a revolution seemed feasible to a lot of people. Read It Can't Happen Here for an example of a book that presented the fears of the time."

      I think that's a waaaay long stretch. I've never heard anything remotely like that and I was born in the decade immediately following the Great Depression. My father, mother and uncle all lived and worked throughout the 1930s, as did numerous more distant relatives, and the media of my youth were filled with rehashed news and stories of the 1930s and 40s. I've never heard anyone even suggest before that a revolution was possible here much less make a real case for it.

      There's always a book. Someone could portray today's times any way they wish just by selecting the right book(s) from the almost infinite range available. Wearing a tinfoil hat is mandatory when doing such research or the reptilian Nazi aliens will get you.

      "Why did HUAAC have such a field day in the '50s? Because people were willing to join the Communists in the '30s."

      There was a fashionable but naive affection for communism (lower case "c" just as in "capitalism") in the 1930s in certain circles. By the 1950s communism had clearly become a cancer on the world and the Cold War had begun. Nothing at all to do with any real possibility of a revolution in America in the 1930s.

      "Another downturn like that with our currently reduced safety net scares me."

      The possibility of another depression (not "downturn") should scare anyone, but in the context of the Great Depression, what on Earth do you mean by "with our currently reduced safety net?" There were no "safety nets" in the 1930s.

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  80. Re:LOL...Slashdot Crowd Getting Cramps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who said anything about excelling? Cheap is cheap.

  81. Broaden your abilities by ImTwoSlick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With the current situation in the Tech industry, it is more important now than ever to broaden your field of expertise. Don't do just "programming", but get more training in a field that needs programmers and researchers. For example, I just graduated with my Comp Sci BA, and am now getting my Masters. Except now I'm specializing my degree in bioinformatics (a highly growing field). General programmers are a dime-a-dozen right now, so make yourself marketable.

  82. I say work in India and move back to US.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of comments to the effect of "Why would you want to work in India for a lesser salary, since even if you save a ton, it wouldnt amount to anything when you move back to US"?

    Well, those who do say such things dont take in to account the possibility that US currency may not amount to much 20-30 years from now. And possibly, just possibly, if China and India is indeed the future, who knows what you save might be a tidy enough sum for you to retire.

    1. Re:I say work in India and move back to US.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah or you could take your life savings and put it on the Cubs to win the World Series next year.

    2. Re:I say work in India and move back to US.. by ganhawk · · Score: 1

      Its just not the money. There are other factors too.

      For one, there are no labor laws governing s/w industry. You are paid one flat monthly salary and you have to work something like 80 - 100 hours per week. No overtime payments and No nice 40 hour weeks.
      Btw you dont get No medical insurance there. Okay the cost of medical care is relatively cheap but the company does not pay your medical bills.
      And the work culture is sooo difrent. Your managers will alwaqys try to overwork you.
      You are virtually a slave and you always have to work more than peers to get up in the ratings chart or get out. It gets insane.

      Where do you think the CEO's make money if they pay the indians the same kinda money they pay here.

      Stay in america and go to school if you are out of work. Do your phd instead of spending 4 years in india

      --
      Python script to convert photos into "artsy" portraits: http://p2pbridge.sf.net/pyPortrait/
  83. Myth busting-drivers licenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We do even more than that. We give drivers licenses to illegal immigrants. If we're anal retentive? Then permissive must be a sight to behold.

  84. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funniest post evar =)

  85. Forget IT by sjb2016 · · Score: 1

    There will always be English teaching jobs in Japan. Go there, get paid enough to party it up, meet lots of loose, extremely hot women.

    Uh oh, there goes my good karma. It happens.

  86. How does 50%+ income tax rub ya? by melted · · Score: 1

    I'd rather live in a country dominated by conservative christians and pay 14% income tax (which is what I paid last year).

    1. Re:How does 50%+ income tax rub ya? by vistic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm fine with high income tax if somethings done with it.

      In many of those countries the result is less of a divide between rich and poor... most people are distinctly middle class, which is almost the only class. And their government takes care of everyone nicely and provides for its citizens. It's big government without being overbearing and infringing on its citizens liberties. I personally think countries like Denmark are role models for the rest of the world these days.

  87. But wait!-The wages of folly are ruination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Remember, the whole point of this global trade is to even things out. That means the US drops and the developing world rises."

    There's one fatal (and obvious) flaw in this "move to India" plan. If we *assume* that all(1) the people who are presently affected by outsourcing are allowed in? Then what happens is the same thing that's presently happening in the US. Too many workers for too few jobs, and the wages are depressed. Now why would a "rising" economy want that to happen? Quite frankly, job creation instead of job unsurption is the only way out of this mess.

    (1) Someone will point out that it will not be "all". That simply reenforces the fact that "labour movement" isn't the solution that people think it is. What will happen to the "rest"?

  88. food by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    I would consider it if I was out of work, but I can't *stand* indian cuisine. The smell makes my stomach turn and curry makes me gag. I don't mean to insult any of our indian readers, but is there readily available "american" food in India?

    This is a serious question, not a troll!

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    1. Re:food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Indians don't survive on curry alone.

      Don't expect beef, but just about everything else is available.

      When I went there in 1998, I was scared to death that I would hate the food and lose weight. But was pleasantly surprised.

      Went to one fast food type place where I got a HUGE plate of Chinese stirfry (with chicken) and a can of Coke for about $3 Canadian.

    2. Re:food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes,
      There is...in fact if you dont find a job in india as a programmer , you can very easily get a job at a Mcdonalds or a Pizza hut in most cities. The pizza actually tastes exactly like american pizza hut. By the way, you can get a full meal in India for less than 3 dollars and feed your whole family at a fine dining restarant for like 10 dollars. Electronics and other goods are just as expensive so not everything is cheap, just food ,clothing, and shelter.

      While i'm off topic i might as well add..

      If pakistan starts firing nukes the US should be just as worried as India. Pakistan may be "fighting" against terrorism but it also offer asylum to them.

    3. Re:food by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Wow, you must be allergic to turmeric or something, or live somewhere where the Indian food just sucks. I've never tasted Indian cuisine I didn't like. :-)

      mmm... saag paneer...

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    4. Re:food by dieresis · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope not. To attempt to join the words "American" and "cuisine" into one concept is a taste crime.

      The British word "curry" doesn't refer to any particular flavor or dish. Most Indians use the term to refer to any dish with a sauce, or to the sauce itself. It's just that useless a word.

      Indian food itself is incredibly diverse. Styles of cooking vary markedly from region to region and by ethnicity as well. The stuff you get in restaurants in the West is almost always Punjabi and Muglai food, in fact, the same exact dishes on every menu I see. Somehow it's become singularly identified with Indian food, and few restaurateurs break out of this profitable formula.

      Still, as an alternative to the local fare, the Indian version of Chinese food (inauthentic but tastier than the fake American equivalent) is popular in many cities.

    5. Re:food by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      I've never been there, but with 1,1 billion citizens and a GDP significantly higher than neighbouring countries, there's a good chance you'll find any kind of US junk food chains (Mc Donalds, KFC, Pizza Hut, et al) in the major-and-not-so-major cities.

      Plus, I don't know ONE city (and I've lived in 6 countries) in the world where there is not at least one Mc Donalds (or Mc Donald's knockoff), an european restaurant + a chinese restaurant -these guys are everywhere. Good food should be no problem in India (+, you'll probably end up hiring a cook for you, which will fill all your gastronomical fancies).

      (BTW, you're maybe the first person I hear of, that doesn't like Indian cuisine ;)

      --
      Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
    6. Re:food by dvNull · · Score: 1

      Hmm lemme see .. when i was last in India ( 1996 ) I visited Pizza Hut and KFC. Most major cities have burger places and possibly pizza places as well. Not that i consider Pizza Hut to be 'good' pizza.

      The only thing i would assume which would be hard to find in India would be GOOD Italian food. Then again outside of NY Tristate Area its hard to find good italian food and pizza in the US as well. Pizza hut, Domino', Little Cesars whatever suck. Hell most pizza available in California sucks. There are quite a few decent places tho .. most notably Speederia Pizzeria in San Carlos :)

      - dvnull

    7. Re:food by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Just mentioned this in an earlier post, but Bubba's Grill at Adyar, Chennai, serves authentic Southern cuisine at, well, not-so competitive rates. Don't know if it still exists of course.

    8. Re:food by jlanthripp · · Score: 1
      I certainly hope not. To attempt to join the words "American" and "cuisine" into one concept is a taste crime.
      Dahi bhala? Uppama? Bittara hodhi?

      Give me pork chops, mashed taters with gravy, buttered peas and carrots, and cornbread any day. Or beef stew with cornbread. Hell, a bacon cheeseburger and fries from the Snack Shack on Battlefield Parkway in Rossville, GA.

      Barbecued ribs with potato wedges. Chicken with dumplings. Fried chicken and biscuits. CHILI!

      For breakfast, scrambled eggs, grits, bacon, biscuits and gravy.

      ...the fake American equivalent...
      You mean to tell me that the Chinese restaurant at the corner of Battlefield Parkway and Lafayette Road, which is run by a dude who immigrated from Xi'an in the Shaanxi province, doesn't serve authentic Chinese food? Is is automatically fake because it wasn't actually cooked in China then shipped over? Oh, wait - it was cooked in the US. And this is slashdot, the one-stop-shop for US bashing by the ill-informed, poorly-spoken, barely-literate masses who believe that all things in, from, or of the US suck, and therefore the Chinese food cooked here sucks. My bad.
      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    9. Re:food by dieresis · · Score: 1
      You mean to tell me that the Chinese restaurant at the corner of Battlefield Parkway and Lafayette Road, which is run by a dude who immigrated from Xi'an in the Shaanxi province, doesn't serve authentic Chinese food?


      Probably not. Just because the owner is Chinese, the cook is Chinese, and all the staff are Chinese does not mean they serve food that any significant percentage of Chinese people would eat. Restaurants are businesses and will serve whatever their clientele will buy as long as it's profitable. Most "Chinese" restaurants serve just this "adapted" cuisine. If there's a sizeable middle-class Chinese population in the area, restaurants may have two entirely different menus, one in English with sugary, cornstarch-laden dishes adorned with baby corn water chestnuts, drowned in soy sauce; and another in Chinese with traditional Chinese fare.

      The addition of a regional qualifier like "Mandarin" or "Szechuan" and claims to be "authentic" are usually meaningless. For example, there at least 20 so-called Szechuan restaurants in the San Francisco Bay Area, which has a large Chinese population. Only one of those restaurants has Chinese diners waiting in the foyer for tables every night.

      [A]ll things in, from, or of the US suck, and therefore the Chinese food cooked here sucks.


      No, American pseudo-Chinese food is bad because it tastes nasty, not because of its location. There are good Chinese restaurants in the U.S., just not many of them.
  89. Re: BS by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Fortunately, economics is NOT a zero sum game (see: Wealth of Nations, Smith, 1776.)

    You mean the same book that mentions the importance of tariffs in protecting domestic industry?

    Like you have ever read it.

    Why don't you at least give me the chapter that deals with your BS statement.

    The book was written a long time ago, advocating a financial system that was in its infancy. Just because the 10 points on the Libertarian Party's website makes sense to you doesn't mean you have a clue about society, human nature, or the purpose of life itself. It also doesn't mean you can pretend to have read famous books.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  90. Serious culture shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've traveled fairly extensively around India and I have a hard time seeing the average US born programmer comfortable over there. Sure, Bangalore and the other tech hubs actually have a couple of western-feeling stores and restaurants, but on the whole they are nothing at all like a US city. Many things a US resident are used to simply aren't available at all.

    Also, even in India it does take a fair amount to really "live like a king", esp if everybody can tell by your skin, clothes, and attitude that you're an american. Prices will rise accordingly when you walk in the room.

    Sure, the overall cost of living is low but this is due to the generally smaller housing and much simpler life style well into the middle or upper middle class. I've stayed with several families in that general income range and it's definately not what american programmers are used to!

    1. Re:Serious culture shock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. A 6 month contract or something would be a great life experience, but only a few very open-minded westerners would be able to make a go of it for a long term.

    2. Re:Serious culture shock by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

      The best line in that parody article not long ago about the family that followed their outsourced jobs to India was:

      "The hardest part for me has been getting used to the food," said Mary Jackson... "We can't afford any."

      The original article is here.

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  91. Re: the major doesn't matter? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    You make a good point, but I will say this: I think the I.T. crowd's "I'm only going to code/admin systems/develop web sites/etc." attitude makes some sense, when you consider the state of the industry in recent years.

    Basically, you've had a boom/bust cycle, so now it's "survival of the fittest". There was a lot of "dead wood" to get rid of in I.T. Lots of people suddenly became "computer experts" almost overnight, in a race to grab some of the easy money in the late 90's and 2000. Now, everyone's playing a game of chicken... Who's going to give up under pressure first and bail out? The people who know they want an I.T. career, and want it badly enough, are going to hold fast to what they want and not settle for anything else.

    Meanwhile, most of the wanna-be's are getting out, and switching to jobs elsewhere. Good. It needed to happen.

  92. -1, Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is slashdot. logical discussion is not allowed.

  93. I've got people skills... by eraserewind · · Score: 1

    I've got people skills, God damn you! Why can't you understand that? ;-)

  94. India Market Booming by yintercept · · Score: 1

    People need to realize that the move to India is not just outsourcing. The US market is saturated. US companies need to get into India, Pakistan and other booming markets because that is where the growth will occur.

    As for the jobs issues. There is not a net loss of jobs when you think of the world as a whole. This outsourcing is actually creating a big boom in job growth.

    The one big question, though, is if the jobs will result in salary increases in the third world, or just hasten the transfer of wealth to the wealthiest of the world?

  95. OK, the outsourcing thing just peaked.Bigot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The worst thing that could be happening is that the opportunists who got into Java development during the 90's are realizing that they should have stayed in merchant banking - where Daddy is placing them now - and the rest of us are waiting on the end of the upheaval to continue making more and more money."

    Elitest drivel. Thou shall not use our OS, lest you corrupt it. Thou shall not live in our neighbourhood, lest you lower our property values. Thou shall not work our jobs, lest we cease to make the money we feel we're entitled to.

    A pox on your house.

  96. ITS HAPPENING AGIAN! by Mastadex · · Score: 1

    back in the 70s almost all north americans started buying asian cars. because the labour was cheap and the cars cost less...same thing is happening here with the IT industry. Unfortunately, the more money people spend on foreign cars, themore fuct up our economy is. dont believe what you hear in the papers. almost everything relys in some way or form on the united states. if it starts suffering. most of the world will follor like a bunch of blind lemmings. In about 10 years (by the time i finish University) the market will have shifted agian right back into north america. its only a temporary thing. people in india are not paid enough compared to people in america. there will be unrest.

    --
    A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    1. Re:ITS HAPPENING AGIAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so right about Indians not getting paid well.

      For one, there are no labor laws governing s/w industry. You are paid one flat monthly salary and you have to work something like 60 - 100 hours per week. No overtime payments and No nice 40 hour weeks.
      Btw you dont get No medical insurance there. Okay the cost of medical care is relatively cheap but the company does not pay your medical bills.
      And the work culture is sooo difrent. Your managers will alwaqys try to overwork you.

      Where do you think the CEO's make money if they pay the indians the same kinda money they pay here.

      Stay in america and go to school if you are out of work. Do your phd instead of spending 4 years in india

      -Someone who has worked in india

    2. Re:ITS HAPPENING AGIAN! by Mastadex · · Score: 1

      Exactly what im saying! The work force will get fed up with that eventually and come back home to north america. History repeates itself in weird ways :)


      overworking employees is a very inefficient way of generating revenues.

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
  97. bastards.... by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0

    have lots of fun working in india for 12,000 USD a year......=)

  98. Move to India and work 24 hrs a day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Y'all slashdotters complain about india not leting you go there and work. But you dont want to work there.

    For one, there are no labor laws governing s/w industry. You are paid one flat monthly salary and you have to work something like 60 - 100 hours per week. No overtime payments and No nice 40 hour weeks.
    Btw you dont get No medical insurance there. Okay the cost of medical care is relatively cheap but the company does not pay your medical bills.
    And the work culture is sooo difrent. Your managers will alwaqys try to overwork you.

    Where do you think the CEO's make money if they pay the indians the same kinda money they pay here.

    Stay in america and go to school if you are out of work. Do your phd instead of spending 4 years in india

  99. Centers of Excellence? by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

    A lot of the highly qualified talent has traditionally been mobile and attracted to centers of excellence globally.

    Are they perhaps beginning to think a bit too highly of themselves?

    It might be more accurate to say that people are attracted to food/money/shelter and if they can't find these in the place where they're living now, eventually they'll have to move someplace where they can.

    hey, who moved my paneer?

  100. Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by MSBob · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I worked as developer in this industry for over eight years. But there is only so much humiliaton and abuse and disregard that one can endure in a career. What the fuck is a softwae developer's career worth anyway? We are always the bottom of the corporate totem pole, we are treated as nerds and misfits and now we don't even have a good paycheck or any sense of security. Fuck that I say. You can kiss my J2EE development ass.

    I'm switching careers to trades. It isn't that hard and most of us can work with our hands and will take twenty seconds instead of twenty minutes to calculate how much tile is needed for the bathroom walls. I've already done a few tiling projects on the side and now I'm getting my electrician's papers. Soon I'll be able to cover everything from finishing carpentry to wiring and plumbing. Pays just as well as the office job did at peak if you're willing to work hard. Last month I netted $5,000CAD (I live north of the border) which is a very healthy sum here especially that that's AFTER TAX money. And wehn was the last time you heard of a plumber being outsourced to India? That's right my friedns, when that pipe bursts in your CEO's house even the 20,000 Indians he's hired arent gonna be much use at 15,000 miles away.

    So my friends, next time you hear that your job is getting shipped to India tell your manager that she can kiss your ass goodbye because it's a great opportunity to give up your (most likely) shitty job and do something useful instead. You'll be surprised how rewarding trades can be compared to an office job.

    Oh and in the evening (that's right trade jobs run 9 to 5 not 8 to midnight, imagine that!) when you get home there is no reason not to fire up the computer and do some open source coding, for fun, without the stresss and aggravation of a PHB meddling with good things and making stupid suggestions. Write some great software and donate it to Open Source. Even Indians can't compete with that pricing model :-)

    So my friends this is our new reality we all have to face. We all love programming but it doesn't make us money anymore. It started out as a hobby (for most of us) and now is the time it went back to being a hobby. For a living however, we must do something more lucrative that can't be outsourced by the next bunch of stuffed shirts. Like trades.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    1. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 5, Interesting

      MSBob wrote:

      "...You'll be surprised how rewarding trades can be compared to an office job."

      I agree. After 40 years of very serious software development (OS internals, languages, macro processors, protocols, device drivers, machine and peripheral emulators -- not JavaShit or Visual Barfic), I am changing careers because it seems no one wants actual, real software designers/developers anymore. So I say, "Screw 'em all!"

      I got a hint of what was to come in 1990 when I moved into this house and had cable hooked up. The installer seemed too bright, too articulate. We talked. He was a degreed electronic engineer who used to design the "sleds" that give those thigh-mounted data entry devices we see being used by inventory takers their specific functions and behaviors. He quit and became a cable TV installer because of low pay, long hours, abuse and PHBs. He never looked back. In his new job he had variety every day, was outside a lot in fresh air and sunshine, was never seriously put out, and never took his job home with him.

      I've never been ideologically anti-corporate, but it's now clear to me that corporate America is committing suicide. I no longer care. I'll donate the bullet or the razor or the match, however they want to put themselves out of their misery.

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
    2. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      I've seen this argument a lot, but my question is, "Who pays the plumbers if no one else is making any money?" We can't all be tradespeople. The demand won't be there.

    3. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen this argument a lot, but my question is, "Who pays the plumbers if no one else is making any money?" We can't all be tradespeople. The demand won't be there.

      There'll always be jobs. Even if the economy collapsed, infrastructure broke down and famine was widespread, there will still always be a job market. Look at Somalia, Zimbabwe and Iraq - they're all international basket cases at the moment but people still manage to work, exchange goods for services, and have families.

      I'm by no means saying it would be very much fun for our standard of living to disappear but let me offer this: both sets of my grandparents were piss-poor farmers, subsistence really, without the benefits of dairy/grain/poultry boards to inflate their value. The only money they got from the government was for service during WWII. No electricity, plumbing, running water. Yet they were intelligent, hard-working, wholesome people who all lived late into their 80s (except for one grandmother who just celebrated her 98th b-day last week).

      If the economic and technological clock was turned back 100 years, yes it would suck, yes many would suffer (particularily the pampered and those who rely on tech to live or be productive) but life would go on. Our big worry would be the 3 billion plus masses of Asia deciding they like the view better from this side of the Pacific.

    4. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by silverbax · · Score: 1

      Interjection on this--
      There is a difference between changing careers to a self-supported trade and just giving up tech to work for someone else in a trade.

      The grass is not always greener. I worked trades prior to becoming a developer, and I hated it. The pay was low, and you often have to work in very cold or very hot temperatures. You can get injured on the job, and the work is dirty. You need to be able to physically protect yourself on some work crews, because some of the guys you work beside are either one step away from jail or looking to get in. Unless you own the business ( just like the office ), expect to do a lot of the grunt work, little or no health insurance, and you can't expect to lug bricks around when you're 55 years old.

      I paid for my tech career with blood and sweat from blue collar jobs; my knees are already bad, my back is shot and there are numurous other ailments that will stick with me until I die. If you think it won't catch up to you, it will.

      If you like the work, give it a shot. But don't be disillusioned.

    5. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by AngryWookiee · · Score: 1

      Yeah but if all of the middle class jobs are sent overseas then who in the hell is going to have money to build new houses so that we can do our carperntry, plubing, etc. jobs?

    6. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by DelphiGuru · · Score: 1

      Bingo. A point noone seems to ever notice. Eventually it will all fall apart. I've noticed that people have said that people will adapt and move on, but not everyone can. There are a lot of basic developers in the US that will be working at lesser jobs. The impact on the economy will be huge. The Gov't just hasn't figured it out yet because they look at the stock market. Sure companies are making a profit because they are using cheap labor to get the job done, but there will be noone to buy the product unless you are doing B2B. That will not keep things going. Eventually change will occur.

    7. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by MSBob · · Score: 1

      The key is to stop working for someone else and start doing stuff on your own. I never apprenticed with a construction crew. I bought a very old house and a fixer uppper and worked on it for the last three and a half years. The amount of konwledge and experience I got out of it was enough to convince me that I could do it as a day job for someone else. Especially that I received a lot of praise for the work I did on my own house. I got a few gigs from friends who needed odd jobs done around their homes and then it sort of snowballed. I started getting work from referrals and now I get more calls about work than I can handle. If I wanted to I could probably grow a small company around this right here but I enjoy working with my hands too much to get back into a management role.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    8. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
      Pays just as well as the office job did at peak if you're willing to work hard.
      I'm curious. If we AREN'T willing to work hard, would you say we're better off staying developers?
      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    9. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by MSBob · · Score: 1

      Probably. The more vague the artifacts you have to produce the easier it is to get away with bumming around and pretending. Contact wally@dilbert.com for tips.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    10. Re:Who gives a fuck about IT jobs anymore? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Awesome!

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  101. So where do I apply? by JahToasted · · Score: 1

    Hey I'm sick of being unemployed... there is zero chance of me getting a job around here. I'll go to India (or where ever), just tell me where I gotta sign up.

  102. Wow, propaganda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had no idea that Indian companies might try to "spin" the news about outsourcing. Hmmm, way to go Slashdot. You #(#$'ing morons.

  103. before you move by msg1825 · · Score: 0

    Before you move, or just visit India for a short time, do yourself a favor and get the necessary immunizations. India still has a bunch of diseases that Westerners have absolutely no immunity for. At one point, the mortality rate among Americans visiting India was as high as 1%. Hope this helps.

  104. Idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you even there or out at some protest chanting "Ho! Ho! Such'n'such has got to go!"?

    The person you're ignorantly replying to is spot on.

  105. Levels of income by mehtars · · Score: 1

    Whats happening right now is a global shift in where things are engineered. This has happened before as well. Basically, I am talking about how efficiency and difference in cost drives a certain economy to another area.

    basically, the US produces about 10 Trillion dollars worth of goods and services. Now the US economy, as most of u know exports 600 billion dollars worth of g.s and imports 1.6 trillion dollars worht of g.s. Now who is buying the rest of what we produce?

    thats right... other Americans! Basically the US is still going to produce just as much as it was-- most of the labor market in the more ineffienct areas will free up and shift to other areas.
    What do you think happened to the US car industry once the japanese came in? they were forced to become more effiencet. What happened to US manufacturing? those areas of the job sector shifted to other areas, but still the US unemployment figures stayed low. Even right now at 6 % unemployment isn't to far from ideal unemployment at 5 %.
    because of indian standard of living is different than the US, (the cost of a pizza delivered is about Rps 60- roughly a dollar, cost of a hair cut 40 rps, the cost of a pen 10 rps) makes it more competitve. Until the indian standard of living rises, there will be a shift of jobs... and those jobs will enter more effienct markets.

    1. Re:Levels of income by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up child.

      India = 3rd world hell hole. It is lower cost and "more efficient" because they live in squalor. Well 99% of Indians live in squalor.

      You don't think those phone lines to butt fucked egypt, Montana are free, right? They're subsidized by you. Those traffic lights are subsidized by you. See, in egypt, it's cheap to live because they don't pay for these "luxries." You wanna shit there? find a hole.

      India allows US companies to circumvent pollution laws, minimum wage laws... If that is "more efficient" then I hope you choke on your tail pipe and tell me again how it's efficient you moron.

    2. Re:Levels of income by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

      "Whats happening right now is a global shift in where things are engineered."

      No, engineering is only a small part of it. What's happening right now is a global shift in where any kind of exportable work is being done.

      "This has happened before as well."

      No, this has never happened before, at least not on this scale. What has happened before has been the movement of low-level manufacturing overseas to take advantage of low-cost labor and the shrinkage of niche labor markets here due to increasing use of machines in place of hand labor. When shoe manufacturing went overseas, when textile-related fabrication went overseas, when steel went overseas, as shipbuilding has gone overseas, etc., those areas here were disrupted but other fields were large unaffected.

      What is happening today is that everything that can be sent overseas is being sent overseas, from many of our remaining manufacturing jobs to programming, engineering, architecture, medical diagnosis, paralegal work, investment analysis, accounting, etc.

      The only things not going overseas so far are clueless executives' jobs and PHB's jobs. They should hope their jobs go overseas before they are hanged from lampposts by the people they have helped to disemploy.

      "Even right now at 6 % unemployment isn't to far from ideal unemployment at 5 %."

      Those are no longer meaningful statistics -- they are junk stats. People who have exhausted their unemployment insurance benefits are no longer counted as "unemployed." People who have given up on finding work are no longer counted as "unemployed." People who have taken shit jobs just to avoid starving and are using their Masters and PhDs to flip burgers or stack boxes are no longer counted as "unemployed." My superprogrammer friend who took his own life last year after two years of being unemployed in the wake of a corporate takeover and inevitable consequent massive layoffs is no longer counted as "unemployed."

      "Until the indian standard of living rises, there will be a shift of jobs"

      Jobs will continue to shift until we:

      1. outlaw it,
      2. prohibit the purchase of better representation in Congress than American citizens have by foreign firms such as Indian outsourcers and warm body providers,
      3. eliminate business tax deductions for expenses associated with exporting American jobs,
      4. drastically curtail the H-1B and L-1 style of guest worker visas and eliminate all the loopholes,
      5. imprison business execs and managers here who skirt anti-discrimination and comparable pay requirements,
      6. behave like a sovereign nation and control our fucking borders as to both the movement of people seeking work and the movement of businesses seeking to export jobs for short-term profits and bonuses.
      7. call the bluff of companies who threaten to move overseas in the face of sane limitations -- "Don't let the door hit your ass on your way out."
      8. return to a sane and controlled transfer to poor and developing countries of only those industries that are truly no longer best done here. Their standard of living has to rise by the generation of energy and creativity from within, with the help of world markets, not by the entirely parasitic means of devouring the guts of the host economies that feed them.

      With regard to (1):

      • No foreign person or business has any inalienable right to come here and take jobs from Americans.
      • We are a sovereign nation. We can make laws in our own interest.
      • Do you think that the loss of our technical and white collar jobs all up and down the line is somehow inevitable, as the apologists for offshoring have claimed? Think again. We are not Nicaragua or Somalia. Those 100,000 people in the Dept of Justice (as large as the entire population of
      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
  106. Where is your brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a friggin third world country, you clown!

    What do I have to lose? My health, my life, my career for starters.

    God damn, kids today can be so stupid!

  107. No, it's different than the car industry and Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the 70s, the Japanese started making better cars for less money.

    Today, Indian outsourcing firms are making fourth rate software for less *upfront* and make it *late* and *buggy* assuming it even does anything at all and then someone has to spend another 6 to 12 months fixing what they fucked up.

    No, it's nothing like getting a superior Japanese car for less money in the 70s.

  108. The upside is... by sashang · · Score: 1

    Well at least the nature fo the jobs that are going over are somewhat mindless (Java, database, J2EE) and all that wank. Thank god for people that actually solve hard problems, like the people on Topcoder.
    See the topcoder rankings by country. India is 16th. I think this is indicative of the fact that the standard of problem solving there isn't high. It's also indicative of the fact that the nature of jobs outsourced don't require the brains that warrant a higher ranking. So all you retards complaining about losing jobs to outsourcing: 1) you are retards 2) try doing some real science like medicine, maths, physics or some real computer science 3) and then come back and complain about life being difficult.

    1. Re:The upside is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why American companies have moved lot of cutting edge R&D work to India? A friend of mine, an international student who came from India, told me that GE, HP, Intel, IBM, Sun, Oracle, Microsoft, Adobe..and whole bunch of them have mission critical stuff to India...not only that, he said that the % of patents being filed from India is growing at a rate of more 100% for all these companies...so I am wondering if the statistics that you are referring to is an indication of anything..

    2. Re:The upside is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank god for people that actually solve hard problems, like the people on Topcoder."

      Went there, thought it was mildly interesting, and tried to sign up. The registration page had colors that made its text virtually impossible to read without doing Select All or forcing colors and background to local values.

      The default programming language selection offered C++, C# and Java. Java? Paul Graham rightly points out that Java was specifically created for mediocre programmers.

      Their Submit button doesn't work if JavaScript isn't enabled. I surf with JS disabled because I'm not a complete idiot. When you find yourself trapped in a filled-out form with a nonfunctional Submit button, Reload/Refresh to get JS turned on also wipes everything you have already entered into the form.

      I closed the browser and wrote them off as LowCoders. Maybe they should start with the not-hard problem of fixing their broken Website. Hey! They could even use that as the goal of one of their upcoming competitions, killing two birds with one stone!

  109. Have you ever been to the third world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets just say in poor countries corruption is the norm, and being an american or european as an outsider would not be easy. Honestly they lack western laws and protections so americans who do not understand the laws could land themselves in a heap of trouble. If you want to move to the third world go to mexico, it's close, it's cheap you can live in a seaside paradise, and forget about work get a condo in the US. Spend 6 months there 6 months in the US make a decent hit now, make some smart investments and live off of them. Do some contract work on the side and you are as good as gold. Why would anyone honestly subject themselves to the harshness of that existence. All I can say is I was talking to an indian at uni and he was saying he thought america was great because we saw things differently, and americans are so creative and clever that he can understand how america achieved the position it was in and that back in india it is about survival. They will not think as openly as americans and will not take risks like we will and thus will not develop like america. America is successful because people here have the balls to get off their asses and risk their future for an idea, for a dream, for the promise of success. That is what makes america great and that is why we will continue to succeed. Forget our problems, they maybe smarter and harder workers than us but that 1 fact should keep us going strong, american ingenuity. Just remember America consists of people who left our respective countries for a chance at success and for a better life we are not going back.

  110. propAganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you can't get a job because of those shifty Indians.

    Then again it may be related to your inability to spell simple English words.

  111. Here, here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried a lot of different food and I don't like Indian; the way it tastes or smells. Shit's nasty(and some of it smells like actual shit).

  112. The articles are fake; they are P.R. only. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0, Troll


    This is my guess: The articles referenced in the International Herald Tribune and the Financial Express are not real articles. They are advertisements by people who stand to gain financially if people read the articles and believe what they say. They are placed in the publications by public relations people. The publications may have been genuinely misled or someone there may have taken money to run them.

    If you aren't Indian, India can be a miserable place to live. There are many cultural elements that a European would not want to imitate. And, you certainly would not want to be paid 1/5 or 1/10 what you are paid in Europe or the United States.

    There may be a few inquiries from people who want to go to India as top-level managers paid Western salaries. Probably such openings are very, very few and would involve unpleasant compromises.

    1. Re:The articles are fake; they are P.R. only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats true my friend. Dont come to india. I hope this trend reverses soon. I will be happy to see it that way. Its going to take some time propably 10 years , the economy could bounce back.

  113. Seems like sombody... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ...needs to read thier own sig. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Seems like sombody... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure his sig is supposed to be self-mocking. Try reading some of his other posts, especilly some of the early pro-Be ones or the more recent pro-KDE ones. He's an unwavering-cause-addict, if he has to drop one then he finds a new one, and I think the sig is his way of saying he knows it.

  114. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FAIL IT

  115. You still pay US taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nobody seems to be aware of the fact that you still have to pay US taxes if you work abroad. That is in addition to whatever taxes you pay in the host country.

    1. Re:You still pay US taxes. by silverbax · · Score: 1

      Don't you only pay taxes when you maintain residence in the U.S.?

    2. Re:You still pay US taxes. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      You have to file a return, but your first $80,000 earned abroad is not taxed by the US. You pay local (i.e., Indian or whatever) taxes on everything you earn.

    3. Re:You still pay US taxes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you have to pay taxes even if you give up your citizenship, for several years.

  116. And in other news... by Anonymovs+Coward · · Score: 1
    IHT (the other paper named in the article) is a Paris-based English-language newspaper owned by the New York Times.

    Really, did you need to go to whois to discover something that's plainly written at the bottom of the page? More proofs that moderators don't actually read articles any more than posters do.

  117. The "Financial express" is an Indian paper website by rasper99 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    If you hit the home link on the article's web page it has a copyright notice at the bottom of the page:


    Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.


    It's propaganda plain and simple.

  118. Highly skilled Americans driven away by GOP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wouldn't want to get away from bush, dick, colon and asscraft?

    1. Re:Highly skilled Americans driven away by GOP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, time to exit the closet.

  119. It's going to happen eventually by foo12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My company just asked me to relocate to the Philippines for a 1-2 years (minimum) so they have someone on-site at all times. Now keep in mind my situation is different from most people in the tech industry --- I'm keeping my hourly wage, and the company is covering my housing expenses (I would have a 3-bedroom villa in a gated community, a maid, a security guard and a driver --- all that is costing them less than US$1000/month). So the deal is sweeter than moving to India, but the principles are the same.

    Right now I'm in the middle of my first trip to the Philippines and it's been... a trip to say the least. Everything about this experience has been positive, largely because Filipinos seem, as a whole, a happy, gregarious people.

    Everyone here speaks at least some English and anyone with an office job speaks exceptional English. The only place we ever stumble is on phrases and idioms. (Quite honestly English here is on average better than in the states --- McDonald's employees speak better English than they do in the US)

    Food is American friendly... if you absolutely must, there's McDonalds, KFC, PizzaHut, etc. but the local food is also quite good. Markets and grocery stores are fine, and you can certainly muster American fare from what you can find there. And everything is cheap --- I ate for about $3/day last week and, last night, splurged and bought a $10 meal at a resort restaraunt.

    After that I went out to one of the hottest clubs in the city and spent about $30 on cover charge, a couple drinks for myself, and a round for 15 of my coworkers. (When I say coworkers I mean "very intelligent, funny, cute, single women all under 30" we'll leave it at that.)

    My advice -- don't reject the idea of moving overseas outright. Regardless if you come back ahead or not, it's going to be a great life experience and be a nice item on your resume.

    1. Re:It's going to happen eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hits a certain nerve. I've worked in a local branch of an international company. Everybody with an English name automatically earns five to ten times more than equally skilled natives and is usually arrogant enough not to bother with the local language even after five years of being resident. "Everybody speaks English and if they don't, they should." Bugger me! What a service, you can go anywhere in the world and expect to get by in your native tongue. And complain if you cannot. (See numerous travelogues out there.)

      I don't know about you, but I don't find it particularly exciting to travel someplace where "everything is just like back home, only lots cheaper".

    2. Re:It's going to happen eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything about this experience has been positive, largely because Filipinos seem, as a whole, a happy, gregarious people.

      You say that until a Muslim extremist blows you up for being of the wrong religion.

    3. Re:It's going to happen eventually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ture... but that happens in the US too. Maybe not as often, but it happens.

    4. Re:It's going to happen eventually by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Bzzzzt... wrong island. I feel safer here than I do at home.

    5. Re:It's going to happen eventually by foo12 · · Score: 1

      Philippines is different, primarily due to a couple centuries of colonization by Spain and the US. The former brought Catholicism and Christian first names, the latter brought English as a common language --- English is the language of instruction, business and politics. The local languages are still widely spoken in social settings (and even at work when a concept isn't clear in English), and I'm beginning to pick up Cebuanno already.

      And it's not "just like back home" ... it's westernized, but that doesn't make it the same.

  120. Sad but true by dot*bizzare · · Score: 1

    The slashdotters responses to this article is a living testimony to the fact that racism was not only invented in the west, but is pretty much alive and kicking today.

  121. How to Work in India by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    How would anyone know where you are working? You can be anywhere in the world and just say you are working in India. In fact you can impersonate 200 Indian programmers while writing code in Miami.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  122. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racist.

  123. Get With It by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    We are repeatedly hearing about how difficult it is to find work. We have to convince the peope with the money to invest it in custom technology. Have we lost the innovative drive that has carried us so far? Computer prices have plunged and people have just gotten used to waiting for prices to drop even more on everything.

    IT departments are just cranking out front ends for glorified addition machines. People shove tons of information into computers and what do the computers generate? Sums and differences with a few other statistical values. Big fat hairy deal. Let this kind of work go to India.

    The human mind would go crazy if all it did was add and subtract. Naturally computers should produce smarter results too. People have massive I/O bandwidth and they have to think more complexly than current software in order to cope with the environment.

    Let's install this kind of bandwidth into machines. And let's make machines do something really valuable or distinctive all by themselves without any need for human control, like discover a cure for a disease or invent a better mousetrap.

    Many machines are computerized today. They are computer controllable or at least able to communicate with computers. IT people should endeavor to automate these machines more or bridge gaps between machines that have limited/nonexistent computer interfaces. The peanut butter jar should be computerized perhaps with a robotic knife to spread it and a wireless link to report how many slices you are eating while trying to lose 45 lb.

    People do too much in their lives. How can anyone enjoy life if they have to figure out how to find a better job? Computers should be assigned this task. Just adding and subtracting does not give enough information. The results should be interpreted already and machines should point out what information is lacking as well as how to get it.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  124. Opening: White Monkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking from personal experience, I can tell you that as a foreigner you can either hope to get a coding job or take care of "foreign shit" (interface between your company and foreign customers).
    Unnecessary to say, both kinds of jobs are shit and there's no way in hell your career will advance because you're a foreigner. Ask your Indian or Chinese friends if, in their opinion, you can hope to advance to a real decision-making management position.

    So yes, it's easy to get a job since most of those companies are increasing exports to the West. And hell no it will never be a good career for a European or American.

    Get the hell out of IT...

  125. Capitalism is not freedom by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    The free market ensures freedom. Capitalism merely allow a few to control the mass, and therefore to limit freedom. (Yes, this is marxism rhetoric.) That's why we need government intervention to keep this freedom going -- lest monopolies form and lock it up, for example.

    See, what difference in the end is there between a Soviet-style centralized economy, or a capitalistic monopoly-owned economy? Not much: the consumers/workers are screwed, innovation is stifled, etc.

    Look at an hypothetical extreme end, where free market exists but concentration of capital is banned: workers own their company, and they have to compete to satisfy their customer's needs.

  126. No, he's saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy cow!

  127. Brain drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    why shouldn't India take advantage of the brain drain?

    Sure let every highly skilled Westerner you can grab enter your country! Makes your nation "smarter" and your global competitors dumber..

    Worked really well for a few years here in the States

  128. My opinion on India... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw India!

  129. Even modest inflation adds up--quickly. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1
    No, not 3.1% total, 3.1% per year (a very rough average for the last 20 years). To get what a wage at some point in time raise the annual rate by the number of years.

    WAGE * (1.031^N)

    A more precise calculation can be made here:

    http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl

    For a real eye-opener, in 1974 the California minimum wage was $2.00 per hour. In 2003 dollars, that's $8.29. The current CA minimum wage is $6.75--a loss in purchasing power of $3,203 per year in 2003 dollars from 1974. That's equivalent to 474 hours, or 11.85 weeks at the current wage! That is to say, to have the same standard of living as a minimum wage earner working 2080 hours per year in 1974, you would have to work an additional 474 hours to live that well today.

    Play with it a little bit. 1968: $1.65 minimum = $8.72 in 2003-- a loss of $4,097.60 in purchasing power--roughly 607 hours more work at the current wage to reach the same potential as the bottom of the barrel in 1968. Even between 2002 and 2003, minimum wage earners lost $312 in purchasing power. That's how quickly this adds up. What is insidious about this isn't the recent trend, it is that once you go earlier than 1980, the standard of living of the bottom of the barrel was significantly better. If you start pulling back the figures to compare, say, the 1990's to 1980, for a great while the standard of living was 20-30% less at minimum wage than in 1980. If you compare, say, 1974 to 1957, minimum wage earners were actually 15% ahead and 25% ahead of 1952--that is 15-25% ahead after adjusting for inflation--they had that much more buying power.

    The point is, a reversal has happened and we are driving the standard of living down for the poorest people. We spent decades IMPROVING the lot of the poor, now over the last 25 years we've been actively making life WORSE for them. In my book, that ain't cool, not the least because the minimum wage is the baseline for all other wages. When the minimum wage earners get the shaft, eventually my COLA gets smaller and eventually I get the shaft, thus it's not a bad idea to make sure the guy washing the dishes is getting a fair shake.

    ...and yes, I was paid better than average for a high school student. However, although a pretty modest job, I did have to purchase and dry clean my own suits, provide my own transportation and do a little more than ask "you want fries with that?" so a little more gravy on my potatoes was appropriate. At the end of the day, probably equivalent to a pizza delivery boy earning tips.

    1. Re:Even modest inflation adds up--quickly. by slpalmer · · Score: 1

      Notice I said I was working an IT job in High School, as well. That's $6.00 an hour I made in 1985 - 1986, building PC clones, and answereing Tech Support calls. According to the CPI Calculator you provided a link for (cool link BTW, thank you) That $6.00 in 1985 equates to $10.26 in 2003 dollars. As I said, I made $62K last year. That's roughly $30 an hour if you're counting, and yes, I'm doing better than some, but worse than others. Right now, $10.00 an hour is about right for low-end, entry level IT Tech Support jobs. I can name a couple. Microsoft is hiring (Through agencies) phone tech support for X-Box at $10.00 an hour right now. Dell Computers starts at $11.50 an hour. People with very little experiance under their belt can hire on at $15.00 an hour at IBM for phone support. Even with the tech bubble bursting a few years ago, the jobs that are there, still pay competitavely, with inflation in mind, to what they did 18 or 19 years ago.

      Now, to your comment about wanting fries with that, and the pizza guy. I've thought for years that minimum wager earners are getting a raw deal, I'll agree with you there. Minimum wage needs to be brought up to match inflation. Who will this hurt? McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King, and all the companies taking advantage of unskilled minimum wager earners. The cost of your Big Mac will increase.

      No one in the tech industry (That I know of) is making the $5.75 or so that TX current minimum wage is.

  130. Weakness of the Dollar by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    You're assuming that the Rupee doesn't get stronger and the Dollar weaker. In fact, the Rupee was 49 to the dollar 2 years ago and now it's 45 to the dollar so Indian workers are already 10% better paid compared to American workers than they were just 2 years ago.

    There is reason to believe that this trend will continue over time as the Indian economy strengthens and the American weakens to the point that it isn't worth moving work to India. In which case salaries will end up largely comparable.

    Unfortunately for European and British workers it looks like the trend is generally in the other direction for the moment so it is probably more to do with weakness of the Dollar than anything else.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  131. But those number are hiding something. by aepervius · · Score: 1

    The disparity of cost between the country. To hire and give research work for a Western researcher is 6 to 10 times as much more expansive than the western counterpart. other cost are far higher too in wetsern world : the "brick and mortar" cost for example. For their 2600$ India is probably getting much more than ~1/18 of the research done by US (36k$) and that also because of the sheer number of India population. Most of my indian colleague at decision place also understand that Research and Developpement are where to Invest as this bring the $$$ of the future.

    Finally your "highly cited"scientific. You never heard of the network effect , did you not ? I am pretty sure that those number only reflect the difficulty of Indian researcher to publish their work in US publication. I do wonder what would be the result of mostly highly cited person if you took Indian only publication or India buisness research & amount of patent in patenting office. If even India recognize IP even...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  132. Re:the burning question is... by haggar · · Score: 1

    My brain, like any normal supercomputer, functions best at low temperature.
    Best excuse EVER for not wanting to go to hot countries! Hah! I'll steal this line from you, thanks.

    --
    Sigged!
  133. Citations are deliberately not done by PaneerParantha · · Score: 1
    As far back as in 1983 I had read in an Indian journal that Western researchers deliberately do not cite Indian sources. I don't know the reasons for that. But now if someone quotes the number of citations I'd take them with a bag of salt.

    It is true that Western institutions are still leading the research and the scenario isn't likely to change in the next 20 years, but don't forget the head start they have had.

    Also Indian research, at least in the area of weapons follows what Raj Chengappa in his book "Weapons of peace" (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/817 2233302/qid=1075638879/sr=1-7/ref=sr_1_7/002-53537 37-2500827?v=glance&s=books) calls "saw-toothed."

    The explanations is as follows. India was denied many technologies by US and West. Indians developed many of these on their own. Then once Indians developed those, West would come up with an offer of using their technologies (which have already been productionalized and teething troubles sorted out) that Indians can't refuse. So the graph goes from highest to lowest in one step.

    Now, another point that was made in one of the articles linked here was some Pharma company's research centre in Mumbai. They are producing the highest number of patents in the world.

    So while your assessment may be true at this point in time - and it is important to remember that your assessment is a function of time - it will probably not be true in the future.

    That doesn't mean that I foresee a mutually exclusive future for various nations and that one nation will prosper at the expense of others. There will be vigorous competition, and that can only be good.

  134. Temperatures in India by PaneerParantha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those who are considering moving to India.

    Temperatures in India range from -40 celsius to +50.

    In the Northern part of India, we have extreme climate, but in the southern, where Bangalore in located, we have equable type of climate.

    In the North, the mighty Himalayas and many hill stationsare relatively closer. You can go to these hill stations like the British used to do. Sometimes they had two capitals, one for summers and another for winter.

    There are several scenic spots in Southern India. I have never been there, but tourists' accounts say that it is greener and cleaner. Kerala is a very beautiful place. It is ruled by Communists though.

    Sports.
    India is crazy about cricket. It is like baseball except that you can hit the ball and choose not to run.

    If the temperature is a low 38 degrees in April and you don't feel like working, you can always go out and play cricket.

    Diet.
    Indian food is world renowned. However, lot of mixing (also known as adulteration) occurs. The net result is that you don't get to consume as much fat as you would in USA or Canada or UK. Therefore, you lose weight. Also, 365 days of sun per year ensures you become more tanned.

    Imagine the combined effect of this. Once you go back home after a stint in India, girls are going to make a beeline for you.

  135. YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT

  136. Weird by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just saw a job posting on a website yesterday that specified that they were looking for people who were willing to work at "Indian Salary Levels" and then pointed to an Indian job web site as a reference to find out what "competitive" bids were.

    That definitely has me a bit concerned. I'm a programmer and I work out of Mexico, so while I can offer pretty competitive rates, I still expect to get paid well. Unfortunately the market is saturated by programmers, and I believe with time, that will change as programers continue to drop out because of job competition.

    Really, my take on it, at least in the States, is that a lot of people went into software to make money. I think now that it's harder to make good money at it, the ones that are going to stick around are going to generally be the ones who really love doing it. Hopefully that will level the market out a bit.

    The fact remains that some of us are quite skilled at what we do and that some people, no matter how hard they try, aren't going to be nearly as good as those of us who are in this field because we love the write software and have a natural ability with it. For the same reason, I'll never play guitar like Eddie Van Halen or paint like Van Gogh (and that's not to imply that I think I'm the Eddie Van Halen or Vincent Van Gogh of computer programming).

    For most of the time I've been in this field (the last 4 years notwithstanding), most of the programmers were people that really loved it and the ratio of really good programmers to mediocre programers was fairly high. That ratio has reversed in the past few years. When it returns, I suspect the pay will get closer to what we expect as well.

    Even here in Mexico, and granted, I live in one of the pricier towns in Mexico, living at Indian pay rates is simply out of the question.

  137. Who wants what, and why they won't get it by swb · · Score: 1

    This is exactly the problem w/ free trade. Conservatives want it for obvious reasons and progressives want it since they mistakenly believe it will bring up the standards of living in the target countries. Although it does (bring up the std of living), it does so through achieving equilibrium. The problem with that is to achieve equilibrium, two sides need to meet in the middle and that means decrease in the std of living for the higher income group. To prevent this it requires a smart plan, one which is sorely lacking in this case. In the absence of this plan, the only people who benefit from free trade are the really rich as they income gap increases.

    True conservatives (not to be confused with some overlap with Bush Republicans) are actually opposed to widespread immigration and free trade, because true conservatives don't like the cultural or economic changes that go along with it. Conservatives prefer the status quo, or some recent history version of it. Bush Republicans, at least those that overlap less with true conservatives, tend to like free trade and immigration because it his immediate and obvious business value -- forces down US wages and working standards, and lowers short-term business operating costs. The impact it has on US workers or third world environments doesn't matter to them.

    "Progressives", by which I think you mean those more oriented towards a left-wing set of solutions, do think it will improve third world countries through investment, and they also think that large-scale third world immigration is good for the US as well, since, at least since the 1970s, generally tends to "brown" the population which they naively see as an automatic political advantage to them since all "brown" people vote, act and think "left". Some old-line labor lefties have sounded some alarms about this, wisely seeing jobs leaving, low-wage workers coming and their traditional labor constituency getting undermined.

    The big problem in improving third world living standards is that most of the time when jobs and industry are relocated, they are relocated to third world countries with no labor protections and no environmental standards. They're also extremely corrupt places, and its in the financial interest of multinationals to keep bribing officials into maintaining an artificially cheap place to do business -- government crackdowns on labor (or government turning its head when private goon squads do it), ignoring even illegal-by-local-standards pollution, all the usual things we've come to expect from dictatorships.

    I've always though that Microsoft and Communist China were a lot alike. Both promote this kind of all-encompasing future, brook no dissent yet have virulent dissident groups. They both also look awkward and embarassed by high-profile public relations problems that directly contradict their propaganda systems.

    1. Re:Who wants what, and why they won't get it by terraformer · · Score: 1
      Exactly, that is what I was getting at. We as Americans need to utilize the dominant position we have been given/earned/lucked into and utilize it to bring up the less fortunate to our standards through smart use of incentives instead of allowing corporations to dictate short-sighted, self aggrandizing motives that solidify their power through the use of any means necessary, which generally means through corruption and other means that would be deemed immoral by US and progressive standards.

      If non-industrialized nations want to enjoy free trade with the US then they will have to comply with the same standards we apply to ourselves in order to come to the table. Otherwise, it becomes an apples v. oranges issue. I remember reading a news expose on a Central American gold mine owned by 50+ miners in a co-op. An American firm got the local government to transfer the mines to the control of the American firm. 50+ dead miners later the mine came under the control of the US firm. Diamonds and other gems are no better. Needless to say, I have very few jewelry items and all of them are from days before I learned about this.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    2. Re:Who wants what, and why they won't get it by swb · · Score: 1

      Exactly, that is what I was getting at. We as Americans need to utilize the dominant position we have been given/earned/lucked into and utilize it to bring up the less fortunate to our standards through smart use of incentives instead of allowing corporations to dictate short-sighted, self aggrandizing motives that solidify their power through the use of any means necessary, which generally means through corruption and other means that would be deemed immoral by US and progressive standards.

      I that business will never allow for any kind of free trade agreement that mandates even US equivilent standards on the environment, labor organization (which is often analogous to political organization), wages and working conditions, and so on because the only reason the third world is cheaper to operate in is because they don't have any of those protections. If you mandated those things, those countries would probably end up being much more expensive to operate in because the necessary regulation and oversight would be far less efficient than it is in the US -- you can't start regulation overnight and expect it to work.

      I think what needs to be published more often is not just US corporate profiteering on poor labor practices overseas, but the insidious relationship between US corporations and the fairly ugly, dictatorial and oppressive regeimes overseas, particularly of those that like to wrap a flag around themselves at home yet are willing to prop up dictators abroad when it's profitable. I can see a public service TV spot showing a group of dissidents being lined up and executed, and the camera turning towards the firing squad, dressed head-to-toe in clothing with US corporate logos on it.

    3. Re:Who wants what, and why they won't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. That is precisely why the free trade agreements of the past decade should not have been made. By opening the flood gates without all the oversite has created the problem we cannot now get out of. If the oversight had been built in, the outsourcing of jobs would not have been nearly as dramatic as it is.

    4. Re:Who wants what, and why they won't get it by swb · · Score: 1

      There's starting to be a little turnaround -- a number of states' legislatures have introduced bills which would put the brakes on the offshoring of work associated with state contracts. It's hard to know if this is a meaningful thing, but it can have ripples in the way businesses that do business with the state are organized.

  138. Balancing in The End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it's true that the world is very likely to be different 100 years from now. But, the balancing that you refer to is UNLIKELY to be something that you'll live to see.

    Good to see that you're taking the systemic perspective.

    Too bad that your genes won't be participating.

  139. You go, guys! by pwroberts · · Score: 1

    C'mon, guys, don't hesitate! Get on out there after those there jobs!

    Now, when I graduate in 2006 there will be a nice healthy shortage of IT people in the West :-D

    --
    Paul

  140. Reality by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    Most Americans will be precluded from participating in Indiana because of:

    * Debt. Consumer and Credit card debt payments often exceed an India level salary on an annual basis.

    * Transportation cost. Coming to/from the US for visits is prohibitive on India level salaries.

    The only reason to go is to get business contacts/experience that allows you to be a US based sales agent or project manager for outsourcing to India. This is short sided as the labor cost advantage will go away quickly - much like Japan in the late 70s and 802.

    --
    -- $G
  141. You forgot your VAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you earn it they tax you, and when you spend it they tax you.

    What is your VAT again?

    That probably raises your effective tax rate to something closer to 40%

  142. Correction by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

    The numbers you may have seen (55 % is the accurate number for Sweden) is the total tax as a percentage of GDP. That does not mean that people typically pay that much (because the tax system is highly progressive). Most people in Sweden pay only local tax, which is anywhere from 29 % to 33 % of your income. So when you get a paycheck, that amount has been deducted and you take home the rest. Of course, there is still a sales tax on items you buy (but some items, like books, have less sales tax than others) but since sales tax is always included in the pricetags it's a kind of hidden tax.

  143. Re:India: Foreign workers welcome* by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    True. But who wants to live in a country with a dying culture, stagnant language, corrupt national leaders who take bribes from murdering tyrannts and who don't know that their relevance to the world scene ended on June 22, 1940?

    Besides, the number of deaths in France was directly attributed to the lack of care Frenchmen give to their own elderly relatives. France is a decaying, vain, miserable country.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  144. Actually, Bush LOVES them because corps love them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    People leave the US looking for jobs...PANIC!!! President tries to solve this problem by trying to kill all those annoying foreigners...PANIC!!!

    Not really. The main groups killed by Bush are Iraqi's and Afghanis. Neither country are responsible for jobs lost in the US.



    More importantly -- and what makes me most uncomfortable -- is that it is obvious neither Iraq nor Afghanistan financed September 11. Afghanistan either hosted Bin Landen, tolerated him, or were afraid of him... it doesn't matter they were peons. The money AND people and leadership for September 11 comes from Saudi Arabia. Given that's where Bush's oil wells are, it's NO SURPRISE a major PR effort went into linking the Taliban to September 11.



    The current White House does not want to -embarrass- the Saudi's by talking about their link to September 11. After all, a major source of Bush Family wealth is the Saudi regime. That's why we hear blatent lies associating Saddam with 9-11. Although that's died down now.. the latest story is we really went to war to bring freedom to Iraq. You see Iraq was not living up to the Democratic ideals US conservatives have always supported. *cough*).

    George Bush is a fucking fake. He makes my stomach turn. He is disgusting.

  145. Re:Moving to Canada by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Canada requires more than US$30,000 in cash and you must be highly qualified in a professional field to move.

    This has either changed, or you've been misinformed - since there are several different ways to immigrate to Canada, and they're all quite complex (fucking bureaucrats), I thought I'd give a breakdown of the easiest way - Permanant Resident status. You wouldn't be a Canadian citizen, but you'd be well on your way to becoming one. Permanant Resident status grants you priviliges to live, work, and study in Canada as any Canadian would, and is the easiest way to go about doing it.

    Let's assume you're a 'skilled worker' (the category most slashdotters are likely to fall under). You need several things before you can be given a work permit.

    Number one, you need to have at least one year of paid work experience in your field. Sorry guys, kernel programming doesn't hack it (hahaha) unless you were on someone's payroll. If, as a programmer (let's assume you were a programmer), your job description matches what the government has on file for a 'computer programmer', then bravo, you're a skilled worker for a qualifying profession. If you had a different job description, you may find it at the bottom of that website. If you're not a programmer at all, then check the NOC list (now I feel like a secret agent) for your profession and put the four digit code for your profession into the search box on the programmer description page.

    That's a lot of typing for something that's pretty simple.

    Now, we have to make sure you can support yourself in Canada, on your own, for six months. The government says you'll need about $9400 Canadian dollars to support yourself for six months. If you have a family, it may be more. In comparison, the student loan fuckers gave me $7400 to last me an entire year (minus my $4000 tuition). I hope they all die.

    If you have secured work in Canada before coming, you do not have to have this money. However, you'd be stupid not to have a few grand in cash in the bank, or it'll be a bitch to rent an apartment without first/last month's rent.

    Oh, and if you're bringing more than $10,000 in negotiables (cash, stocks, bonds, treasury bills, traveller's cheques, cashier's cheques, money orders, etc), for the love of god declare them at customs. You do not want to spend your first few weeks in prison or have to pay a chunk of change in fines. Just don't.

    Also, while we're on the subject, don't bring marijuana. Seriously, people do this, as if we don't grow our own. You can get it here, and it's cheaper than what you paid, trust me.

    Now, you have to be able to speak the language. If you've gotten this far, you probably qualify for moerate or high English lanuguage proficiency, but you may, at your option, choose to use French as your primary official language instead. Keep in mind, however, that unless you move to Quebec, you will more than likely need functioning English to get around. Whichever you choose, you will have to prove it, either by taking a test of your (e.g.) English, or by providing proof from another qualified organization. If English or French is your first language, just take the test. It'll be trivial. Some people who immigrate to Canada are pretty much functionally incompetant in English and still get in (and that's fine), so if you can understand what I'm saying, you'll be fine.

    Exceptions are in the larger cities, for e.g. Chinese, Japanese, Israeli, Arabic, Sihk, etc. immigrants, as there are already large communities of these persons in the larger areas, and they will be able to help you get acclimated to your new home, and still give you a comfortable anchor, if you desire one.

    For an idea of how easy or hard it is to really get into Canada, take a look at

  146. Exactly by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    I think USAians forget that the USSR, after initial setbacks, slaughtered Germany. The second front helped, but the tide had turned in 1942. Also, the Yugoslavs kicked, first Italy (after initial setbacks), THEN Germany's asses (after initial setbacks) while enduring little support from the USSR and duplicitous behavior from the US and UK. Dedijer tells a great story of finding US Thompsons on Chetnik fighters (Mihailovic's men) when they attacked a Partizan force using Italian air cover assisted by a British forward observer. Remember in Bush's World everything is black and white....

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Exactly by grmoc · · Score: 1

      Heh, Well, the U.S. would have had a hard time importing the kind of weather that initially turned back the Germans (and made Stalin's industrial complex in the Urals safe)...

      Would that the Germans had learned from Napoleon's mistakes, most of Europe might well be speaking German (Their mistake was opening up the second front to begin with... Thankfully..).

  147. Re:Moving to Canada by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    I did the calculation.

    I have a bachelor's degree.
    I have over a decade of work experience in my field, which is on the list.
    I am fluent in English
    I have a basic grasp of French

    I scored 69 points. Take away my French (not a bad idea as it is so minimal) and I'd get the minimum passing score.

    That's pretty tight. The financial figure was from memory when I looked into it a year ago, but I ran the test today. The bottom line is that without pre-arranged employment, it's a pretty tight squeeze.

  148. Education is subsidized, actually by lysium · · Score: 1
    subsidized education -- Subsidized by whom?
    it's been a long time since i've been to the states... do they have cover charges for high school now?

    Property owners pay for high school even if they do not have children. Education costs make up a large chunk of the property tax landowners pay to their local government. This tax can be very expensive (especially in the Northeast), and are in addition to the other taxes you mentioned.

    ================

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  149. Reality check: by lysium · · Score: 1
    I know that's against the principles of free trade and all, but we invented this technology, we are the ones who built it, we supported it, and now the corporations we built it for are selling our jobs for pennies on the dollar to third world countries.

    The Arabs called, and they want Mathematics and Astronomy back. They feel they had a substantial part in starting both sciences, and now want a monopoly on the practice of both. Only residents of the historical Dar al-Islam may work in these fields.

    The world doesn't work that way, sorry. Once the US is senseless enough to give away its lead, chances are it will be gone for good. It sucks, but that is history for you; I'm sure the old Caliphs of yore would agree.

    =============

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  150. Re:the burning question is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "I'll steal this line from you, thanks."

    Yeah feel free, its GPL ;-)

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  151. Re:Actually, Bush LOVES them because corps love th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's NO SURPRISE a major PR effort went into linking the Taliban to September 11.

    Democratics going to this low of a lvl to bash bush is why I turned Republican. We didn't attack Afghanistan as a country. We ousted & attacked the camps there that CLEARLY announced & followed through with their intentions. The taliban DID do it. Bin Laden was sending out press releases for the world to see. Or is your democratic, bush-bashing mentality incapable of putting 2 & 2 together?

    And if we did it for the oil, why are we rebuilding it and handing it back to them? We're paying for it dumbass. It's not Bush's oil.

  152. I could not get into Zanzibar a few years ago by MarkWatson · · Score: 1
    I was very dissapointed - lots of fighting broke out in Zanzibar just days before our scheduled arrival, so we spent extra time in the Sechelles.

    -Mark

  153. HA! They fell for it! by khrustalicious · · Score: 1

    Little does India know that this has been Our Grand Plan all along.

    This finally opens up opportunities in Agricultural Engineering and Development (farming) that has long been ignored by those Hindu smarties.

    I just bought me a pair of overalls and a Pabst Blue Ribbon: I am now prepared to enter the new 'thing' in the job world.

  154. In Soviet Russia... by TheBoostedBrain · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, indian companies outsource to America

    --
    -- When did Ignorance Become a Point of View?
  155. Re:Moving to Canada by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Pre-arranged employment is a good idea anyway - since you're most likely to find professional ('skiled') IT employment via the internet or by networking anyway, it's probably just as easy to find a job programming in Canada from outside of Canada than it is from inside.

    What I can never understand is how so many people cross borders so easily, when it really seems quite difficult to do so. When I was visiting Israel, I was quoted a statistic from the newspapers by someone I was staying with: there was a minor exodus from Israel at the time, a significant number of families moving out of the country just to be safe, and over 75% of those people leaving the country in that period were moving to Canada. I was kind of proud, but at the same time, I wondered how hard it really is to do, and how hard it really is to move elsewhere.

    Can anyone suggest a country that's easy to move to and worth moving to at the same time? I don't mind learning a new language or working simple jobs just to pay rent, I'd just like to get out and explore. Anyone?

    --Dan

  156. Re:LOL...Slashdot Crowd Getting Cramps by zungu · · Score: 1

    Cheap can be excellent. Do you know about an OS called Linux? It is free/cheap and it is excellent. Same goes for Indian software, it is cheap and gives you a good value for "what you pay".

  157. Anal retentive my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US allows more legal immigration than the rest of the world combined.

  158. Re:Outsourced,etc, the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the Indian economy is already a disaster with a 2% reduction in jobs in the organised sector. 75% are actually below the poverty line and the per capita consumption of foodgrains per annum is at 151Kg compared with 178Kg in 1998 and 150 Kg in 1950 as per the latest census data. Elections are round the corner and so we have plenty of manipulated and nonsense statistics by the ruling party. As far as speculative capital is concerned...it is mostly under foreign control. Another thing to fear in India is the fascism and communalism of the ruling party.
    A.Mani

  159. Re:Actually, Bush LOVES them because corps love th by Corpsesarecute · · Score: 1

    Democratic, not as in the Democratic party in the United States, but as in the political theroy of Democracy. Democratic in this sense being of, or relating to the theroies of Democracy.

  160. Prices in India (just got back) by jtheory · · Score: 1

    I was travelling around northern India from late December to mid-January of this year, so I can comment on the cost of living expenses.

    Comment: yeah, it's pretty damned cheap. Big stores and most restaurants have fixed prices, but you are supposed to bargain for most things, including taxis and even room prices at some hotels. So you get in the habit, but every once in a while you start to feel like an ass arguing over pennies when you're paying prices that low. Even if you don't bargain at all (and pay up to 3x or 4x the "real" price), it's *still* cheap. I got into the habit of paying bicycle rickshaw drivers *more* than they asked for just because I could bear paying some guy 50 cents for busting his ass dragging us all the way across town.

    Mind you, I did get "ripped off" a lot because I was an American tourist, but still...

    When we got to Delhi it was colder than we'd expected, so I bought a thick knit coat for 250 rupees ($5.50) and had it altered to fit me better for another 50 rupees (a little over a buck). I didn't even argue on the price for the alterations -- I was so suprised how cheap it was -- so I'm sure the real price was more like 20 rupees, if that.

    Everything with a large labor component, especially, is on a massively different scale from the U.S. My wife and I stayed in a hotel in Jaipur with attractive, well-maintained rooms cleaned daily, laundry service, available internet-connected computers, etc. etc. for Rs. 750 ($17) a night. Fire-eating and Rajasthani dance exhibition in hotel courtyard included. We stayed in another, less-nice but still clean hotel (with a magnificently friendly and helpful proprietor) in Delhi for Rs. 300 ($7) a night. We ate in some pretty posh restaurants and had final bills of about 1/10th what they would be for similar food/service/atmosphere in the States (well, the atmosphere of "terrace next to palace, on water's edge" isn't available, but you know what I mean).

    Jewelry, artwork (like the miniature paintings Udaipur is famous for), crafts, etc. etc. are also amazingly cheap. When I was last in India in 1999 I bought a beautiful, double-gourd sitar with a hard case for about $100, and have seen similar instruments selling in the U.S. for $2000 and up.

    I hope this gives you all some perspective on cost of living. I'm sure it's rising in some parts of India (and it *will* obviously rise in the real tech centers), but it's got a long way to go.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  161. Irrationally Exuberant Greenspan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if the US tax base starts slipping, and Bush keeps lowering the tax rate for the [Upper Class] for 4 more years.

    Will Alan Greenspan be singing the praises of [Outsourcing the Economy?]

    Or what happens when Bush sacks Greenspan, the stock market crashes, interest rates skyrocket and Bush's presidency gets recall'd?

    Brother I'd buy a ring side seat.. the next fourteen months are going to be awesome..
    speaking from 2015

  162. Health Care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have socialized health care?

  163. Re:EE is probably a poor choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India now has more EE's than the US. Unless you get a Doctorate and work for the semiconductor business, its highly likely you'll have a hard time finding a job. Most of the design work for products (Consumer, Auto, Computer, Cellar, RF) will definately be outsourced to India or Asia.

    If I was in your shoes I would think about majoring in Finance and minor in a Science with CompSci, Chemistry, Mechanical, or Biology.

  164. Re:Moving to Canada by C10H14N2 · · Score: 1

    Refugee status helps.

    Pre-arranged employment is a great idea, but try getting that for moving across your own country before thinking you'll be able to do it to another country. I spent six months trying to get responses from the east coast while living in Los Angeles. People just don't want to talk to you unless you're already settled--often they will say exactly that in the vacancy announcements. I imagine if the immigration office was added to the equation, you'd have a snowball's chance in hell. In the end, I just blindly moved.

    If you just want to "explore," go be a language tutor in Prague or something. That's one industry where getting the necessary sponsorship is comparatively easy because it is in the job description.

  165. Guys, guys, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comparing the height of your taxes is pointless unless you calculate your Total Tax Burden.

    Taxes are shiftable. No state income tax? Oh, but you have a sales and personal tax. Oh, no sales tax, but you pay through the wazoo in real estate taxes. No? Well, how about a whopping tax on the first 5 years of your new car?

    Think you're beating property tax by renting? No, dear naive, you pay property tax AND, in many places, an additional rental tax on top. All hidden in your monthly rent check.

    Comming, meet going. Here there, pointing at any one tax is an excersize in stupidity.

    In the US, your total tax burden is easily in excess of 50%. Easily. On whole, the total tax burden in the US is highly REGRESSIVE, so the less you make the bigger the percentage tends to be.

    Sure add up your pay stub. Then, add in sales tax, and motor taxes, and don't forget your property and school taxes. Yea, road and bridge tolls. Remember also, in the US, your employer "pays" 7% on top of the 7% they don't give you. Belive me, your employer considers that "other" 7% part of your "pay".

    Comming, going. If the Feds pay less, then your state pays less, and your local school tax goes up, and vis versa.

    What you can't calculate is the embedded taxes, the absolute s*itload of taxes the local merchants have to hide in every loaf of bread the sell. Beer, I know that one, price alone includes 72% tax in PA, and you pay 6% sales tax on top.

    Try and figure out how much of the price of a loaf of bread is pure tax. From kernel of wheat to your table, taxes on the farm, the mill, the baker, the store, the bag maker, all the trucks in between, taxes in the water and electricty consumed, it's all "tax" YOU pay in the price of the loaf. Then, you get the priviledge of paying for it using money that's been skimmed to the tune you see in your paycheck.

    Go, figure it out, and be sick.

    BTW, many europeans actually have a concept of the tax the pay. They've been fairly normalized through the VAT tax system. They also get far, far, more in return than most Americans for their "dollar".

  166. Rubik's cube! by IntelliTubbie · · Score: 1

    >I'm basically a master of the Rubix cube
    It's Rubic's Cube. Rubic was the name of the man who invented it.

    Dear Lord, it's Rubik's cube. If you're going to correct someone, at least make sure that you're correct yourself! Yeesh.

    Cheers,
    IT

    --

    Power corrupts. PowerPoint corrupts absolutely.

  167. Middle class is overrated. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The middle classes in both rich and poor countries have this unshakable belief tha they have the right to cruise on ther inneficient polluting cars around the country, or to take cheap hollidays in spite of the environmental damage they cause, or to replace their electronic gadgets every 2 years.

    If all this means that the "middle class" will have less money and thus will become more judicious about ther spending patterns I am all for it.

    People in rich civilized countries today rarely have to worry about eating, a roof or healthcare and their health problems are due to overconsumption issues (hearth attack, obesity, smoking).

    So cry me a river for the middle class, I think it is high time some of that wealth is redistributed elsewhere.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  168. Oh dear. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Germany lost in Europe due mainly to the USSR.

    The help of the US was of course important to divert German troops, but the amount of USSR people dead (20 million) says where the war was won.

    And also Germany was not unoppossed, they simply were vastly superior. The US are not unopossed in Iraq for example, but they steamrolled their way to Baghdad all the same.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  169. I have lived in Singapore, Malaysia by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    One of the main reasons I left was exactly the drastic reductions on freedoms.

    In Singapore if you are an oposition politician the goverment will sue you for libel everytime you dare to advance a criticism. Until today all the judgments have gone, surprise, surpirse, in the favour of the goverment.

    Newspapers, books and magazines are heavily censored, the Internet was proxied which is quite effective there given the small size of the country.

    In Malaysia it was similar with the slants proper of an Islamic country.

    I have to say in favour of Malaysia tha they are by far the most open Muslim country, but that may be constrained to Kuala Lumpur and some other places with heavy Chinese influence. In most conservative provinces you have your traditionall mullah trying to impose Sharia law and banning such evil endeavours as computer games and beauty pageants.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  170. If you don;t mention the USSR... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... then you are completely misinformed.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  171. hmmm. by twitter · · Score: 1
    An AC that's managed to be labled troll a lot states:

    twitter, do you really have to make your stupid point by offering yet-another-dollop-of-proof-that-M$-is-evil you seem to enjoy so much?

    You know, if you weren't so pathetic in this regard and just stuck to the facts then maybe no one would follow you around repeating the most embarrassing bits of your, ahem, distinguished posting history for everyone to read.

    I'm continually flattered by your attention, but here you raise an interesting question: why do people do what they do? The answer, of course, is because they want to. No one ever HAS to do anything. Think about that for a while.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      overwhelmed by your superior philosophy my man.

  172. No, it is not. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Be thankful Mexicans ignore lame ass trade barriers and go to work to the US, that keeps vast tracts of the US economy running smoothly.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  173. Oh no, of course not. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    They go hiring bricklayers for the development of a multiplataform trading system, an embedded OS or the administration of datacentres.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  174. Re:Actually, Bush LOVES them because corps love th by xxdinkxx · · Score: 1

    mod parent post up +5 informative :-), please.

  175. boobies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://desimasala.wronger.com/

    these pictures should correct your misconception.
    No, I don't work for them, just a customer :)

    1. Re:boobies by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 0

      I think you meant to send that link to the parent poster, because it supports my claim and counters his.

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
  176. Re: BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got bored with all the talk about making nails and just gave up.

  177. Been there done that by heroine · · Score: 1

    Already pay 50% income tax to survive in the US. Of course, it's broken up into FICA, state, federal, healthcare, and life insurance to make you feel good.

  178. Nah, that's bullshit by melted · · Score: 1

    My total tax rate for the past year is 14% as I said. This is calcualted as the amount witheld in taxes divided by the total yearly income. Sure there's 8.8% sales tax on top of this, but Swedes pay even more in sales tax ON TOP of their 50% income tax. And yeah, there are additional taxes on businesses, so by the time you spend your money it is already taxed three or four times at hefty rates.

  179. Cost and fair trade by kbchair · · Score: 1

    Its not about free trade but its about fair trade. The US IT worker incurred local US cost in terms of housing, accomodation, medical and etc. Where else the Indian IT worker will accmulate enough money to spend it back home. The US IT worker do not have this privilege and thus need to charge at local rate. To be fair India and US should open up all sector and allow free flow of all types of trade, this will include the right to reside in both country. This way every person in both country can compete on equal footing.