Slashdot Mirror


UPN Renews 'Star Trek: Enterprise'

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that 'Enterprise' has been renewed for a fourth season. UPN will make the official announcement on Thursday, but production executives already told the SaveEnterprise.com fan campaign the show will be back, and the show's actors have been ordered back to work. The only snag? It looks like 'Enterprise' might be moved to Fridays next year, and Firefly fans can tell you what a great place that is..."

665 comments

  1. Good news... by jrj102 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, this is good news. Enterprise is not my favorite flavor of Trek, but it's better than nothing. Besides, there have been a couple good episodes this season.

    I'm sure some people would have revelled in an Enterprise cancellation... to them, I'd like to pose a question which always bugged me: if you don't like a show, you don't watch it, right? If you don't watch it why would it matter to you whether or not it is cancelled? It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people. It's not fun losing a job, folks.

    Anyway... on with the flame fest.

    1. Re:Good news... by digitalsushi · · Score: 5, Funny

      To boldly go ... and then stop briefly ... and then boldly go again, where no one has gone before!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Good news... by yndrd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because some of us remember when Star Trek wasn't just an excuse to sell toys and keep "camera men, editors, and janitors" in jobs.

      Sure, it's always been a profit thing, but once there seemed to be some soul behind it, and watching the juggernaut limping into entropy is just depressing to those of us who had any emotional connection to previous incarnations of the show.

    3. Re:Good news... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's the same with the people who wish episodes 1 and 2 (and probably 3, when it comes out) of Star Wars weren't made because they think George Lucas "ruined" the series with them. Or people who wish that any Final Fantasy game past 6 was not made (even though 7 was the second best in the series after 1, you bastards).

      Many people (myself not included) would rather have nothing at all than something they don't like when it comes to their favorite TV shows / movies / etc.

    4. Re:Good news... by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Agreed, it's become the thing to do to take pot shots at Enterprise around here. That's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinions. Here's mine: Enterprise is getting better. Traditionally, Trek series hit their prime in season three, and this is no exception.

      As for Friday nights, well, that's what TiVo is for, right?

    5. Re:Good news... by pavon · · Score: 1

      It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people. It's not fun losing a job, folks.

      Is that true? I always figured that all the janitors, camera men etc were studio employees, and would just work on whatever projects the studio happened to be filming at the time. I also assumed that editors and writers were freelance anyway, and always tried to have a few projects going at once.

    6. Re:Good news... by centauri · · Score: 1

      No, it's not better than nothing. What Trek needs more than anything else is a mercy killing - or at least a vacation for a few years. That would let the fans forget about all the bad stuff and reminisce about all the good stuff, while the movers and shakers worked in the background to figure out how either to take the whole idea in a fresh direction or just leave it in peace.

      Are you seriously arguing that a poor show should be allowed to remain on the air just so that its janitors can remain employed? That's so ludicrous I can't even wrap my brain around it.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    7. Re:Good news... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, well, that's just like, your opinion, man.

      If you don't like it, don't watch it. There are obviously plenty of people who DO like it, otherwise it wouldn't still be on the air. I, personally, don't care for 'Enterprise', but I don't whine about it - I just don't watch it. If other people do like it then hey, that's grand, they can watch it all they want. Their opinion is no less valid than mine.

    8. Re:Good news... by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that Lucas "ruined" anything. It's that Episode 1 and 2 were crap! They were badly acted (from actors we KNOW can do better!), badly written, badly directed and badly concieved. The only good thing about Star Trek were the special effects, but SFX are a dime a dozen. Good stories are much harder to find.

      And yes, I'd rather not have to wade through pools of drek and offal when I want to indulge my craving for science fiction. I would rather have a few well crafted diamonds than a mountain of coal.

      That mountain of coal exists because there are some people, myself NOT included) who will tolerate anything, no matter how badly made, just because it is science fiction.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    9. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they all look and talk like us....

      or was it just talking about krik and ricker getting all the virgins that are xenophiles?

    10. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you've seen a few to many of the MPAA commercial at the beginning of movies with our favorite stunt man working so hard.

    11. Re:Good news... by Matey-O · · Score: 1
      Enterprise is not my favorite flavor of Trek, but it's better than nothing
      Are you really sure it's better than nothing? I'd prefer an absence with a return to a better series concept with better management.

      Please oh please why won't somebody pull the plug on this dead horse?
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    12. Re:Good news... by drakaan · · Score: 1

      Hell, Friday night is the only night that there aren't two other shows on at the same time that my wife wants to watch. Woohoo Friday!

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    13. Re:Good news... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      What makes your opinion any more valid than the opinions of people who liked the movies?

    14. Re:Good news... by Syberghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Enterprise is not my favorite flavor of Trek, but it's better than nothing.

      No, it's not. It's far worse than nothing.

      With nothing, they might take the time to rethink things, start hiring actual writers instead of using the same two people over and over again, think of fresh new ideas instead of the same tired old time-travel and deus ex machina tripe, and just generally scrape off the freakin' barnacles and come back later with a good show.

      Enterprise is crap, but what's worse is it's crap that's preventing progress.

      Besides, there have been a couple good episodes this season.

      Read what you wrote again. Two good episodes, in a whole season. There's a term for that. It's "crap".

    15. Re:Good news... by LoadStar · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, this is good news. Enterprise is not my favorite flavor of Trek, but it's better than nothing. Besides, there have been a couple good episodes this season.

      I'm sure some people would have revelled in an Enterprise cancellation... to them, I'd like to pose a question which always bugged me: if you don't like a show, you don't watch it, right? If you don't watch it why would it matter to you whether or not it is cancelled? It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people. It's not fun losing a job, folks.

      Is it really better than nothing? The fact is, a bad series can have an impact on the entire franchise. The fact that Enterprise has garnered lackluster ratings - at best - and has had very few really good episodes from a creative aspect makes the chances of more Star Trek (whether it be TV or movie) less attractive to both viewers and Hollywood executives.

      To pull the argument that cancelling the series puts people out of work is rather pathetic actually. Does that mean that we should keep trash on the air, just because people worked on the series? Imagine a schedule full of shows like "The Mullets" just because people didn't want to cancel the series because it would put people out of work... *shudder*

    16. Re:Good news... by javatips · · Score: 1

      It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people. It's not fun losing a job, folks.

      Actually, the biggest looser in a show cancellation are the actors. The actors are often stigmatized by the role they played and have trouble getting on another show.

      The support and production staff will just move to another show (existing or new). Their job security is not related to their popularity but to their actual skills.

    17. Re:Good news... by marcop · · Score: 1

      1) I'm still upset about losing Farscape while crap shows like Enterprise continue. Get rid of the crap so something new (ala Farscape) can fill the gap.

      2) I used to be a Trek fan until Voyager, Enterprise, and the latest ST movies started sucking so bad. I blame Braga and Berman. Put Star Trek to rest until good writers/producers are found.

    18. Re:Good news... by centauri · · Score: 1

      Why didn't they just take a long break, write all the episodes for the first two seasons, and then just start filming directly in the third season? Then they could release the other episodes later as prequels, or, hey, not at all.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    19. Re:Good news... by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 1

      It bothers me that a show as bad as Enterprise is given money for season after season, given chance after chance so that it finally gets "a couple good episodes this season" while shows like Firefly are shown out of order, moved all over the schedule, preempted, and then left to rot despite being far better than Enterprise has managed after all this time.

      I like to hope that if Paramount and UPN weren't sinking cash into Enterprise, that money might go to other, better genre shows. That maybe, we'd even get some original plots, rather than rehash after rehash of old Trek plots. Is it in the Trek bible that writers may only try halfway original plots twice a season? (And by which, I mean original to Trek. I don't mean to demand completely original ideas.)

    20. Re:Good news... by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      If you don't watch it why would it matter to you whether or not it is cancelled?

      I don't get UPN, so I have no oppinion on this particular show, but in general I think there is a very good reason to want a show you don't like to be cancelled. The prime reason is that the networks only have so much money to invest in making shows, and if they are spending it on something you don't like, it is taking that money away from being invested in something that perhaps you would like. If enough people voice their oppion about a "bad" show, then the network will listen and replace it with something else.

      over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people.

      That is unfortunate, but I hardly think major investments should be made based on the fate of a little over a hundred jobs. It isn't as though these people have no chance of being employed again. If they were hired once, they probably had some qualities that would make them worth hiring again. It is even possible that these people have a chance of being part of the crew on what ever show replaces the current one.

      What happens when major shows go off the air, not because they are cancelled, but because they are at the end of a long run? That is just the nature of television shows, because they all eventually come to an end. No one gets a job like this and expects it to last forever.

    21. Re:Good news... by jrj102 · · Score: 1

      You're misunderstanding my premise.

      First of all, I don't accept the premise that Enterprise is crap. I don't think it is nearly as good as TNG, but I also don't think it is any worse than Voyager. However, there are people that really like the show.

      Also, it is a fairly safe assumption that if Enterprise gets canned that it could be over for Star Trek... which would be devistating to a lot of people.

      I'm just saying that it is lame to root for someone to lose. If the show stays on the air BECAUSE PEOPLE WATCH IT (the ratings aren't very good, but they aren't horrible) AND BECAUSE PEOPLE WANT TO SAVE IT (there was a massive letter writing campaign) then why should you WANT IT TO GET CANCELLED? Because you think that the franchise will improve as a result? I've got news for you: that's not how Paramount will look at things. Whenever someone says "Hey! Let's do another Star Trek show/movie/etc" Paramount will say "Nope. Enterprise bombed, we're not going to do another one."

    22. Re:Good news... by platos_beard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, it may be worse than nothing, but its better than Voyager.

      --
      What's a sig?
    23. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Wars geeks will love Episode 3 -- It's the movie they've waited their whole lives to see: Darth Vader vs Obi-Wan Kenobi lightsaber battle. The first 2 sucked because neither Lucus nor the fans reallly cared what went on, so you got filler.

      Similarlly, when Enterprise quits the stupid time-travel plots and gets on with the ROMULAN WAR, trekkies will go apeshit over the series. Nobody cares about the Gee Whiz filler stuff.

    24. Re:Good news... by jrj102 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. However, I have less time feeling sorry for (starring) actors in that scenario, as their payrate more than compensates for the precarious nature of their employment status.

    25. Re:Good news... by wiggles · · Score: 2, Funny

      hey were badly acted (from actors we KNOW can do better!)

      Yeah. And episodes 4-6 weren't "badly acted from actors we know can do better"?

      Do the words, "That's no moon. It's a space station!" mean anything to you?

      We used to play a Star Wars drinking game in college. Every time you heard Luke whine, you drank. Man did we get plowed.

    26. Re:Good news... by Marnok · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just make every episode one that revolves around time travel. I mean gosh, every other freakin episode of every other modern Star Trek series uses that worn out storyline.

    27. Re:Good news... by jrj102 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      News flash: If Enterprise gets cancelled the money is more likely to be funnelled into "Who wants to marry a one-legged garbage man with a severe flattulence problem" than another sci-fi show.

    28. Re:Good news... by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      I can certainly argue a bit with your point. If a show that you don't like gets cancelled, there's a change that something better will take its time slot. It's similar for the actors, cameramen, janitors, etc. If they're contributing to a show that people don't like, that's not exactly fulfilling. They want to entertain people. If their show gets cancelled, they could go on to work for a show they like better.

      Disclaimer: I have nothing against Enterprise.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    29. Re:Good news... by yndrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And that's just, like, yours.

      Why call for anybody to silence their opinions about anything? I'm not saying the show should be taken off the air by force of arms--I'm just saying I hope it's cancelled soon.

      That opinion is no less valid than yours, "man."

    30. Re:Good news... by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only good thing about Star Trek were the special effects

      I strongly disagree with that statement. I wish I could search my history and find the previous lengthy post I made about TNG (it was a gem) but I let my /. subscription expire.

      In any case, how can you say the only good thing was the effects when you had moral issue based episodes like these (off the top of my head in 5 minutes at the office):

      • Measure of a Man (TNG - Individual Rights)
      • Symbiosis (TNG - Drug Addiction)
      • The Drumhead (TNG - Kangaroo Court run amok - scary when you consider what's going on nowadays)
      • Who Watches the Watchers (TNG - Religion)
      • The Hunted (TNG - Veterans Rights)
      • The High Ground (TNG - Terrorism)
      • Devil's Due (TNG - Religion/myth busting again)
      • The Masterpiece Society (TNG - Genetic enhancement/engineering)

      I'd also point out the good storyline based episodes:

      • Yesterday's Enterprise (TNG - Federation at the height of a losing war -- probably the model that DS9 used for the last two years of it's run)
      • Sarek (TNG - Picard has to absorb the emotions of Sarak -- a great acting performance by Stewart)
      • Family (TNG - Followup to Picard's trauma inflicted by the Borg - no reset button like Voyager)
      • The Wounded (TNG - Mission to stop another Federation officer who lost his family from getting revenge)
      • Darmok (TNG - Attempt to communicate with an alien race - probably my favorite episode of Trek ever made)
      • The Inner Light (TNG - Picard lives a lifetime as a member of another race - probably the second best episode of Trek ever)
      • Relics (TNG - Scottie's comeback!)
      • Chain of Command (TNG - Picard is captured and tortured by Cardassians - another fine performance by Stewart)
      • All Good Things (TNG - Humanity's limitless potential is revealed - what better way to end the series?)

      Those are just the TNG episodes that I can name off the top of my head (yes I'm a Geek -- but I don't know the stardates anymore). DS9 had quite a few standout episodes too -- though I think TNG tackled the moral issues more often.

      Star Trek under Gene Roddenberry was always about the story. Under Paramount it's about T&A and appealing to the unwashed 16-24 male demographic.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    31. Re:Good news... by jrj102 · · Score: 1

      If enough people voice their oppion about a "bad" show, then the network will listen and replace it with something else.

      No, that's completely wrong. If a show doesn't get ratings or produce sufficient revanues then the show will get cancelled. Sending a thousand letters to the network with your opinion about a bad show will make ZERO difference. (Although sending letters to a show's ADVERTISERS can make a difference, since that can impact revanues.)

      You forget that it is about MONEY, not about making quality programming. You have to remember that YOU are not the network's customer-- the advertisers are.

    32. Re:Good news... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Just so long as they don't schedule it opposite Stargate:SG-1.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    33. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, it is better than nothing.

      No, it's not

      Yes, it is.

      No, it's not

      Yes, it is.

      No, it's not

      Yes, it is.

      OK people: if you don't like Enterprise DON'T WATCH THE FUCKING SHOW!!!

      Wrap your brain around that, dickweed.

    34. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enterprise HAD the potential to be pretty decent... they folded under the pressure to make it more "trek like"

      I was hoping for a bunch of horrible transporter accidents filling the room with exploding guts, the vulcan to turn into a crazy nimpho hell bent on secretely taking over the ship, and the engineer figuring out a new subspace weapon only to kill himself after discovering how nasty-deadly it really is.

      it had potential to be really cool.... but it is turning out to be as lame as all the others... and yes, if you sit down and watch them now... TNG is pretty lame, only DS9 had real value in decent writing and storyline...

    35. Re:Good news... by Ranger96 · · Score: 1

      But I don't understand - why do you care if it is cancelled or not? If you don't like it and don't watch it, why does it matter?

      Or is part of your opinion that if you don't like it, no one else should watch it either?

      --
      What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.-Ecclesiastes 1:9
    36. Re:Good news... by derF024 · · Score: 1

      Well, it may be worse than nothing, but its better than Voyager.

      and DS9, and TNG and TOS.

    37. re: good news... by ed.han · · Score: 1

      i agree it's getting better. the last 4-6 episodes of the season were quite strong, i thought. but friday night isn't necessarily the death knell: after all, farscape stayed there for years, and stargate SG1 is still there.

      incidentally: i'm awfully curious to know what the nielsen boxes do re: tivo & the like. how do those things work, precisely?

      ed

    38. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok, naming that many episodes of a show long gone "off the top of my head in 5 minutes at the office", you seriously need to get outside more.

    39. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will always be Trek on TV. The sooner Enterprise is canceled, the sooner a newer and better show replaces it.

    40. Re:Good news... by centauri · · Score: 1

      I don't watch the show anymore but that doesn't meant that I can't recommend that no one else watch it either.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    41. Re:Good news... by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with you at all... Obviously money is the only thing that matters. Implicit in what I said is that if every one hates a show, then obviously the advertisers will notice that no one is watching it. Besides, I never even specified who to voice your oppions to. I was just pointing out that it isn't mean-spirited to voice your oppion about shows you don't like.

    42. Re:Good news... by stanbrown · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does anyone else think that they have writen themeselves intot a position where they can't possible get to where they need to get?

      This is, after all, a prequel. Which means that we know where they have to wind up, in order to provide the jumping off point for the show it's a prequel for.

      But then, I've got the exact same problem with Smallville., so maybe it's just me.

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    43. Re:Good news... by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

      I believe he meant Star Wars, not Trek.

      His previous statement made light of fallacies in eps 1 and 2, and I think it is safe to assume that his following statement was also regarding them, especially in light of the known infatuation Lucas had with his movies being all digital (and the freedom for special effects that gives).

    44. Re:Good news... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Darmok (TNG - Attempt to communicate with an alien race - probably my favorite episode of Trek ever made)

      Shaaka - When the walls fell!

      I loved that episode, too, but I always wondered how a civilization with such a specific form of language (i.e., referencing past historical and mythical events) could have ever developed beyond the stone/bronze age?

      How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    45. Re:Good news... by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Darmok at Tenagra! Shaka! When the walls fell! Did you notice that the alien in that episode was the captain of the ship that Khan captured in the Wrath of Khan? He must get around.

    46. Re:Good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Except that we all KNOW that the romulan war took place before phasers and photons and view screens (as Kirk said). So according to the trek history it's ALREADY happened! Also the Prime Directive which was supposed to have come out of the first contact with the Klingons (that started the First Klingon/human was) should also have happened in the Pilot Ep when we first met the Kilingons (and BEFORE the Romulan war). They have already mixed up the history set by the previous series!

    47. Re:Good news... by Fizzol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Or is part of your opinion that if you don't like it, no one else should watch it either? Some people wrap up too much ego into their opinion. Which comes out as wishing for cancellation of shows they claim they don't watch. I stopped going to the Trek Today boards because of this kind of nonsense. The hatred of Enterprise there was almost pathological.

    48. Re:Good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And Kirk's Dead son was the drug addict in "Symbiosis" and Dr. Polaski was one of 3 times she was on The Original Enterprise....oh wait, actors some times plany different parts!?!??!

    49. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who didn't see the connection with Shaka Khan?

    50. Re: good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Largly they ignopre the TIVO/VCR market. The reasoning is that they are there really to measure people watching the ads, not the shows. If you TIVO'ed or Taped odds are you won't watch the ads and so they don't count you.

    51. Re:Good news... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?

      Who cares? I never cared about nits in Trek like that -- as long as the story was good. There have been books written on the nits (mostly technical) in ST -- like control panels appearing in turbolifts if the episode requires it, etc etc.

      But again, who cares? It's about the story and the people in it -- not the technology. The Enterprise itself existed as a medium to tell that story -- at least in TOS and TNG. I gave up after Voyager -- the few episodes of Enterprise I've watched ticked me off.

      It pains me to say this but Trek needs to be put to sleep. At least we'll always have our TOS and TNG box sets.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    52. Re:Good news... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I think Enterprise still has good potential...

      TOS was really quite campy, and I think it rarely took itself seriously. There are things about it I really didn't like.

      TNG may have taken itself too seriously. It was pretty much just a current version of TOS, and was really quite good...

      DS9 was horrible. What were they thinking? Star Trek is about exploration, going places and finding new civilizations, it's not about sitting in one place waiting for things to come to you. The best episodes were when they got the warship and started kicking some ass, but by then I had pretty much already stopped watching it.

      Voyager - well... what can I say? Voyager probably had the most potential of any of the shows. Too preachy with some good characters, but mostly unsympathetic characters.

      Enterprise I think still has a lot of potential, but they've already blown it with the time travel. I like the idea of older technology, I like that that the uniforms are more appropriate, that the ship is small and more submarine like than luxery cruise ship like. Still, too many aliens on board... ruins some continuity with TOS, IMO. They've already experienced too many different kinds of Aliens. What would be better, IMO, is to concentrate on building the foundations of what would become TOS - shakey aliances with some of the alien species we've already come to know, maybe fighting with them and then subsequent treaties... they also need variety. They've spent too much time on the current storyline, it's beyond boring.

      Still, I think Enterprise has more potential than TNG had, but they are blowing it, IMO.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    53. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in a perfect world what you said would be true and valid. But in this imperfect, zero-sum world, and show on the air is taking up time/money/resources for another show.

      Now if Enterprise was cancelled, maybe UPN would get desperate and negotiate to get Firefly back on the air? Highly improbable, of course, but the point remains-cancellation of a tv series one particularly dislikes (I don't actually, but find Enterprise boring) might open up the time slot for a show that is better.

    54. Re:Good news... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok, naming that many episodes of a show long gone "off the top of my head in 5 minutes at the office", you seriously need to get outside more.

      I get outside all the time now. I never got outside when TNG was on. To this day I can tell you the episode name with about 10-15 seconds of footage from anywhere within the episode.

      Yes, that's kind of sad but that's how much I loved that show. It was (in my minority opinion I'm sure) the best overall television show ever. I believe that the last episode was the most watched series finale since M.A.S.H. (though I'm sure Friends probably beat it). Anyone have any sites about this? I tried finding a list of the ratings share of finale episodes when Friends went off the air (because I had believed that TNG was the biggest overall after M.A.S.H. -- and they didn't mention either of them) but was unable to do so.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    55. Re:Good news... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that kid on Square Pegs, too??? Yeesh, there's a flashback...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    56. Re:Good news... by cshark · · Score: 1

      I happen to like Enterprise.

      I think it's well written, well casted, and I wouldn't mind seeing more of it.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    57. Re:Good news... by Daemonik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shaaka - When the warp core breached.
      Shaaka - When he soiled himself.

    58. Re:Good news... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Trekkies (and other geeks) frequently communicate by referencing events in historical episodes. A quote, a snatch of dialog or an episode name transfers much larger meaning in a shared context. There is some debate if they've developed beyond the stone/bronze age however.

      "One does not thank logic."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    59. Re: good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree it's getting better. the last 4-6 episodes of the season were quite strong, i thought.

      Really? You meant the oh-so-tedious time travel episodes, or the one blatantly ripped off from Voyager (of all things!) where the Doctor is left awake while everyone else has to go into a coma to get through a region of space.

    60. Re:Good news... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      As for Friday nights, well, that's what TiVo is for, right?


      The problem isn't with me (or any other Tivo user) watching it. The problem is, it probably won't last long in the "timeslot of doom". My guess is it will be dead by January, and replaced by the new "How to Marry a Space Alien" reality show.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    61. Re:Good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Considering how much of the "History" of trek they have already gotten out of order or wrong (from what the prior series lay down) I don't think they really care.
      1) What happened to the Romulan War before Phasers, Photons Torpedos and subspace comunication?
      2) What happened to the Kiling conflict during first contact with them the lead directly to the prime directive?
      3) What about the Borg Ship on Earth that almost takes over Enterprise yet humans have no knowledge of them before Q.
      4) What about this Temporal War that only seems to effect The Enterprise Time frame and the far future? Not to mention that it seems in the far future Star Fleet "forgets" about it's own temporal prime directive!
      I think they gave up on continuity somewhere around the pilot episode!

    62. Re:Good news... by batura · · Score: 1

      The only reason why I wished this show would get cancelled is so that another ST show could get the chance. I really thought Enterprise blew it with their 9/11 plot arc (season 2 finale) and I haven't watched since.

      I think it will take a completely different show to get things ''back on track''.

    63. Re:Good news... by Lost+Dragon · · Score: 1

      but I don't know the stardates anymore

      I was going to mod you +1 informative, but now I'm not sure I can trust your geektitude.

    64. Re:Good news... by jridley · · Score: 1

      Yes, the whole premise was really pretty ridiculous. Their language supposedly consists of referring to historical events, but you're using standard language symantics to do the referring.

      Doing a "communicate with a species that thinks differently than we do" episode is a great idea, but this was a poor implementation. They didn't come close to convincing me that there was an unbridgable gap between the species, and that we couldn't possibly have communicated before. If everything is stated in terms of historical reference, then you're recursing infinitely; you have to use a historical reference to say what a wall is, and what the action "to fall" is, and so on.

      Admittedly, a really GOOD alien-ness episode wouldn't sell on prime-time, or even in a movie; you need to read a book for that because you need either the narrative or the first-person thread to get inside the other's head.

    65. Re:Good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I think he was killed by klingons there too. :)

    66. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for Friday nights, well, that's what TiVo is for, right?

      You say that as if us trekkies had other plans...

    67. Re:Good news... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are obviously plenty of people who DO like it

      The only people who matter are the advertisers. They're the true customers of T.V.

      Viewers control T.V. only through a distant and hardly measurable relationship between network's profits from ad-space, which might, just barely, be influenced by viewer's tendencies to purchase corporate brands when they've seen them on T.V.

      So it is entirely possible that nobody likes it, and the advertisers perceive it to be a set of palatable stories to wrap around their corporate messages.

    68. Re:Good news... by hummassa · · Score: 2, Funny

      > How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?

      Bulinko walked together in the den with Linia.
      The sons of Bukits stared and they went to the house of Mirkos.
      Shizuko - when Tirbuk got Tewerkal in the Sea of Lurkis.

      (translation: when the subspace fields takes the shell shape, and their frequency is 16 millicochranes, then the warp factor will surpass the next integer number and the energy intake will stabilize)

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    69. Re:Good news... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Sad, but true. Frankly, I think Enterprise was a big mistake, and got bungled from the start, but I'm not looking forward to its demise for just the reason you mention.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    70. Re:Good news... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?

      The River Temarc, Kadir beneath Mo Moteh:

      *points to diagram of warp field*

      Mirab, with sails unfurled !

      *diagram of core breach / collapsing field*

      Shaka, when the walls fell.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    71. Re:Good news... by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      Friday, eh? I'll stick to Ultimate Elimination Challenge.It has better writing and character development than the last couple of Trek series.

    72. Re:Good news... by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm just saying I hope it's cancelled soon.
      gee, that's pretty pessimistic of you - I hope it improves instead.
      (Of course, your scenario is more likely, but that's beside the point)
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    73. Re:Good news... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's lots of Trek actors as guests on Enterprise. A number of actors have had major roles on different shows, like Jeffrey Combs who's had a few roles. Try to listen to the voices more.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    74. Re:Good news... by Kanon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm guessing that people would rather the money spent on a show they didn't like was being spent on something they did like. A good Star Trek show for instance.

    75. Re:Good news... by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shaaka - When the walls fell!

      I loved that episode, too, but I always wondered how a civilization with such a specific form of language (i.e., referencing past historical and mythical events) could have ever developed beyond the stone/bronze age?

      How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?


      Answer: You can't. You can't really even have a language/species that works/thinks that way. It just doesn't stand up to any kind of rational thought beyond the episode.

      But nevertheless, it was a pretty neat idea and made a good story. Unlike some people you see complaining about this sort of thing, I don't expect my sci-fi to make every little bit of sense all the way through. It's supposed to be entertainment, you know. :)

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    76. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk also said they used nuclear weapons. Fat fucking chance UPN is going to put on a show where the good guys are nuking everyone.

      Trekkie nitpickers like you are the worst -- look, would you rather watch non-canonical time-travel crap about terrorist Xindi, or do you want to watch ROMULANS?

    77. Re:Good news... by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Great, but did they cancel Rick Berman?

      ST will continue to sputter along until they replace that ball of ineptitude.

      Should have let his wife do it. Majel has produced some really good sci-fi shows since the departure of Roddenberry. IMHO, Berman can't get it done.

    78. Re:Good news... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      "... had any emotional connection to ... the show."

      I just had to chuckle at this, seeing as most normal people save their emotional connections for things based in REALITY.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    79. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ego? More like lack of ego.

      For some people, Enterprise is like when ComicBookGuy was about to die and said "Oh my god, I've wasted my life!" They want it cancelled so they aren't reminded that they've spent 20 years watching crappy television.

    80. Re:Good news... by BLAMM! · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's one for ya. Mark Lenard, aka Sarek, was the only person (IIRC) to play a Vulcan, a Romulan, *and* a Klingon in TOS. Now there's a guy who gets around. :)

    81. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To nitpick, that's just how the universal translator translated it. It looked like there were semantics to the words they were using, but the true semantics were at a different level. That's why the universal translator and the crew got confused.

      It's kind of like encoding where the coded message is hidden in a plain text that makes perfect sense and doesn't seem to be hiding anything. They just happened to evolve their language that way.

      OK. I'll go report to geek decontamination now...

    82. Re:Good news... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Amen brother, Amen.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    83. Re:Good news... by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "James T. Kirk? 17 separate temporal violations. The biggest file on record. The man was a menace." --Starfleet's Bureau of Temporal Investigation

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    84. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your reference are belong to us!

    85. Re:Good news... by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 1

      "They've already experienced too many different kinds of Aliens."

      The fact that they've introduced so many alien species may have to do with the fact that there are many alien species that become members of the federation in the future.

      "What would be better, IMO, is to concentrate on building the foundations of what would become TOS - shakey aliances with some of the alien species we've already come to know, maybe fighting with them and then subsequent treaties."

      I believe they did this in the first season (or maybe the second) when they rescued Klaang for the Klingons, had crew members stranded on a Klingon Ship, as well as Archer facing a Klingon tribunal. And lets not forget the episode this season where Archer teams up with the Andorian Cmdr., Shran, and is later betrayed by him.

      --
      In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
    86. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeating the same joke within 15 minutes == lame.

    87. Re:Good news... by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

      "How could you teach a course in warp propulsion dynamics, for example?"

      I dunno about you, but one good way of explaining the concept of warp propulsion to me would be, "Ted Kennedy - when the pants fell!" Never before in my life would I have run so fast.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    88. Re:Good news... by ash · · Score: 1

      First off, my position: I don't watch Enterprise but don't want to see it cancelled, either. It would just get replaced with something worse. And I have heard that the story arc is getting better, which is what really needs to happen.

      But...
      It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people.


      I have to disagree on this. Charity is no reason to argue for a show to continue. Using that logic, no show, no matter how bad, would ever be canned. And, should Enterprise be cancelled, then another show would take it's place, hiring back on cameramen, editors, etc., if not the same, then ones who were out-of-work before.

      Anyway, they're union and typically have better safety nets than those of us in the tech world. Which begs the question, why do they need unions and we don't? Should we have unions or should they not?

    89. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darl, when the hammer fell!

    90. Re:Good news... by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


      "I believe that the last episode was the most watched series finale since M.A.S.H. (though I'm sure Friends probably beat it)."

      Ratings for the ST:TNG finale aren't posted anywhere because it didn't remotely rise to the level of MASH, Friends or Cheers. I can't find the ratings anywhere, but I have no doubt that if they were impressive they'd have been listed when TV Guide and others do rundowns.

      That's not to say it wasn't a great show/episode--it was. It's just not quite the cultural force that some of us at /. feel it is.

    91. Re:Good news... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      But most of the aliens they've encountered were not, AFAIR, part of the federation. Certainly I never saw and Xindi, and the whole premise is that Earth and the Xindi work together and are both eventually part of the federation.

      I guess it's just too much, too soon, IMO.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    92. Re:Good news... by yndrd · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's a good point. I'd rather it improve, too.

    93. Re:Good news... by rogabean · · Score: 1

      I know right? What about little timmy's daddy who can't afford to get health insurance for him?

      oh wait that's cuz I pirated movies/mp3's.

      --
      "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
    94. Re:Good news... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well,

      First off, IAMAT (I am not a trekie), but just as we have language of expression we also have mathematics.

      So, maybe they had a finer grained reference for mathematics and such. It just seems silly, to say someone did a good job you have to say a four or five line sentence to say "good job." On the flip side you have a wide variance for approval or disproval.

      Just like if Shakespear developed warp travel and big honking space guns.

      At a base level they are going to have individual words. Of course, it's all left to speculation and you have to the very large believe button.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    95. Re:Good news... by barawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Their language supposedly consists of referring to historical events, but you're using standard language symantics to do the referring.

      I don't think they were really using standard language semantics - I think that was the Universal Translator recognizing certain language constructs. One can draw a parallel to people with aphasia (... in Wernicke's area? Broca's produces gibberish, wheras Wernicke's produces sentences that have word structure, but no grammatical meaning), with recognizing the form, but not the function.

      Their own language semantics would probably have been made highly efficient for describing metaphors (like a suffix for possession, etc.).

      If everything is stated in terms of historical reference, then you're recursing infinitely; you have to use a historical reference to say what a wall is, and what the action "to fall" is, and so on.

      Not really - what humans do is use functional representation in vocabulary - we create poor representation of thought in words, and use those words to describe things. In other words, we feel the emotion of failure, and create the word "failure" - this isn't a perfect thing, though, because there are an almost uncountable number of variations of the emotion of "failure", and so you'd need an uncountable number of words to represent all of those. Or you just accept that it's a poor representation, to limit it to a finite number. Note that I'm not describing a grammatical structure here - I'm describing a vocabulary.

      So, as cultures evolve, their vocabulary grows and grows, far past what's necessary for basic grammatical structure. We use words to expand our vocabulary (English, in particular, has an absolutely huge amount of words that most people never use, but which are very important if you want to express subtle nuances in language) - in that example, they used metaphors. So they still might have some basic grammatical structure, and a very basic language, but the complicated subtleties are expressed metaphorically.

      It's not crazy, though some would say that it's unnecessarily complicated, which is probably true. But some could also argue that Kanji - Oriental pictographs - are also unnecessarily complicated compared to an alphabet, but they survived as well.

    96. Re:Good news... by MCraigW · · Score: 1

      Yes, the current Enterprise certainly doesn't show Roddenberry's influence. Kirk would always bend the Federation rules for good moral reasons, the same goes for Picard. It seems like the Archer character will do anything to accomplish his mission, morals be damned.

      Star Trek under Gene Roddenberry was always about the story. Under Paramount it's about T&A and appealing to the unwashed 16-24 male demographic.

      Hey, I'm 45 and I'm interested in T&A -- and I wash.

    97. Re:Good news... by Cromac · · Score: 1
      If you don't watch it why would it matter to you whether or not it is cancelled?

      Because UPN is spending money and resources on Enterprise when they could be spending it on something better...like Firefly.

      Actually I don't really care one way or the other, I watch it sometimes but it's far from my favorite show. If Enterprise is canceled I hope they replace it with something better, if it's not I'll watch it on occation.

    98. Re:Good news... by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I think the Klingon Incident and Romulan Wars would have made GREAT shows, and it was what I was expecting when they announced Enterprise. It just didn't happen, and i'm just pointing out that at this point it probably WON'T happen.

    99. Re:Good news... by aligas · · Score: 1

      I happen to like Enterprise, but I can comment on why it matters to people if it is cancelled or not.

      There are a variety of reasons I want a show cancelled:

      1) I feel that the show is a mere shadow of its previously great self (see "West Wing, The").
      2) I feel the show doesn't live up to the quality of its predecesor.
      3) I feel that the show plain sucks.

      If I don't like a show I don't watch it, but I still want it cancelled. I want it cancelled because I want that show replaced with something better - something I might enjoy. How boring or stagnant would television be if we never cancelled poorly performing shows but instead let them run until something else brought things to an end?

      I certainly feel for the people that lose their jobs when a show gets cancelled - that definately sucks. But the new show is going to need camera men, makeup artists, wardrobe personel, special effects, etc. My hope when a show gets canned is that these folks wind up on one of the new - hopefully better - shows.

    100. Re:Good news... by Opiuman · · Score: 1

      I share the sentiment, that is why Enterprise's first season drove me away from it. Luckily I just happened to watch an episode from the 2nd season on a boredom streak and was hooked. Somehow they regained the storytelling ability. I'm wondering if Majel Barret/Roddenbery got involved. The last episode of season two, and almost all of the season three episodes are excellent in the same way (IMHO) that ST:TNG was great.

    101. Re:Good news... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm 45 and I'm interested in T&A -- and I wash.

      Look, lest you think I'm a prude there's nothing wrong with having sex (or sexual undertones/influences) in a TV series. If you handle it maturely that is. Tell me what is mature, redeeming or worth watching about a decon scene where the characters rub gel all over each other? What's redeeming about Seven's suit? I'm sure the horny male teenagers that have wet dreams about Seven and T'Pol love these scenes -- but WTF do they add to the show other then that?

      At least TNG finally had the good sense to get Troi into a real uniform and DS9 never "went there" so to say. I've seen soap operas that handle sex in a more mature manner then Voyager or Enterprise. What's wrong with that picture?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    102. Re:Good news... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Even here in the Real World, we a special language for mathematics.

      The symbols and techniques don't easily translate to English.

      Take, for example, "a=4 * (3 + 6)":

      I might say "ae equals Four times three plus six." But that loses the meaning in favor of the order of operations.

      I might say "ae equals four times open-paren three plus six close-paren." But that's clunky.

      I might say "bee equals three plus six. ae equals four times bee." And that's still clunky.

    103. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ken Lay convicted.

    104. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because some of us remember when Star Trek wasn't just an excuse to sell toys and keep "camera men, editors, and janitors" in jobs.

      You mean you remember when you believed Star Trek wasn't just an excuse to sell toys and keep "camera men, editors, and janitors" in jobs. That's what ALL commercial TV programming is about. Notice that those in the biz who talk "art and soul" are usually getting paid alot of money. Hmmm..

      Sure, it's always been a profit thing, but once there seemed to be some soul behind it, and watching the juggernaut limping into entropy is just depressing to those of us who had any emotional connection to previous incarnations of the show.

      Again, just because it doesn't seem that way now doesn't change the fact that it's always been that way.

      Personally, I've been enjoying the series greatly with the whole continuous Xindi plot. Sure, each episode's resolution is still timed to the commercials (0:06, time for the subspace rip, hole, tear, or anomaly) but the overall plot line through the episodes is staying very fresh and less predictable than I would have expected. Yeah, it's pop sci-fi but it's been fun lately.

    105. Re:Good news... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Did it improve that much? I watched the first few episodes and was driven away. Maybe I should give it a second chance.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    106. Re:Good news... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful


      but they all look and talk like us....

      Well, they did introduce the "aquatics", which resemble sea mammals. The problem is that really weird aliens eat up the budget so they have to use them sparingly.

      I suppose they could bring in Michael Jackson. *duck*

    107. Re:Good news... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Why call for anybody to silence their opinions about anything? "

      The following is meant in a general sense, as opposed to talking specifically about this particular case:

      - Lots of opinions are from people who either haven't watched the show, or only watched an episode here and there. That, in and of itself, isn't so bad. However, if I were to present the same complaint about a show they really liked, I'd suddenly be the ill-informed jerk.

      - A good chunk of the opinions have been discussed ad-nauseum already. For example, somebody in this particular story made a comment that they hated the song, and was modded as +5 insightful for it. Uh, right, there's a dead horse that needs to be beaten again.

      - The negative opinions calling for the cancellation of the show aren't helping anybody in any way. What's UPN going to put in Enterprise's place? Farscape? Firefly? Uh, no. They have so many crappy shows on that network that cancelling Enterprise won't make room for some new big yay show. The most likely circumstance is we'll get another Jake 2.0. In the mean time, there is a significant number of people who enjoy the show and have a vested interest in its success, like those of us in the CG industry. (I'm not specifically trying to argue with you here, but if you were to come back with a beneficial reason why it should be cancelled, I'd consider what you said and maybe even withdraw this particular comment.)

      Valid opinions are one thing, but if you imagine that somebody's opinion will suddenly change the show (like the cancellation of it), then the "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" philosophy does apply. Why cancel it when you can just not watch it?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    108. Re:Good news... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that list. I'm actually in the process of rewatching TNG for the n-th time (although for the first time in English instead of my native German), but reading about those episodes is still great.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    109. Re:Good news... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why do I wish it was cancelled? if Berman and Braga are able to completely destroy the fanbase "Enterprise" could very well be the last incarnation of Trek.

      As the nielson ratings continue to further erode - the number crunchers will point out that the series is stale and should be shelved forever - when in reality - it isn't stale - it's Berman and Braga putting holes and ignoring the fan base that's kept Star Trek afloat all these years.

      I don't want it cancelled because I'm mean spirited. I want it cancelled in hopes that some real trek writers will one day be able to do a real Trek Series.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    110. Re:Good news... by smc13 · · Score: 1

      It isn't just his opinion. I don't know anyone who is old enough to see the original Star Wars movies in a theater who actually liked either Star Wars I and II. Of course, I will still sit through III in the hope that it is better (It can't get worse can it?)

    111. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TNG was syndicated, so it wouldn't be included in the published nation-wide ratings, only the local ratings for each market. They did say it was by far the most popular syndicated show at the time.

    112. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And faster than light, no left or right. So you gotta stop to change direction.

    113. Re:Good news... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      News flash: If Enterprise gets cancelled the money is more likely to be funnelled into "Who wants to marry a one-legged garbage man with a severe flattulence problem" than another sci-fi show.

      Perhaps they can merge. It could be interesting. You see, Klingon farts are not set to "stun". If you think goatse is bad, you should see the guy who lost.

    114. Re:Good news... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > I'm wondering if Majel Barret/Roddenbery got involved

      What the hell is Nurse Chapel gonna do? Add a lesbian hologram?

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    115. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REALITY

      On what channel is that?

    116. Re:Good news... by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

      Shaaka - when he posted anonymously on /.

      --

      "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    117. Re:Good news... by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      f you don't watch it why would it matter to you whether or not it is cancelled?

      Because bad shows take up a spot which could (though often isn't) have been filled by a good show. Good shows still require people to make them, and editors to cut them, and janitors to clean up. They have the added benefit of being good entertainment.

    118. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do, odd. When I try to talk to people about actual reality such as science, history, or even politics - their eyes glaze over and the conversation gets jerked over to friends, fraiser, or american idle.

    119. Re:Good news... by DevNova · · Score: 1

      I'm a one-legged garbage man with a severe flattulence problem, you insensitive clod!

    120. Re:Good news... by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      DS9 was horrible. What were they thinking? Star Trek is about exploration, going places and finding new civilizations, it's not about sitting in one place waiting for things to come to you. The best episodes were when they got the warship and started kicking some ass, but by then I had pretty much already stopped watching it.

      DS9 was outstanding... it just wasn't widely accepted by closed-minded fans who wouldn't accept anything but a 'show on a starship' as a Star Trek series. I have this funny feeling that you stopped watching FAR before the Defiant showed up, just for that reason.

      It's not even like the show and it's characters were trapped on the station - they had the runabouts, which were designed to be autonomous warp-capable vessels manned by a small crew. They got out to all sorts of places in just the first season alone.

      Star Trek is about exploration, yes, but it's exploration of the "human condition." Sometimes, those sorts of stories can be best told when you have people coming to you, rather than the other way around.

    121. Re:Good news... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Now a days, pretty much fucking *EVERY* channel.

      Survivior, Fear Factor, Big Brother, Screw Around On Your Girlfriend Island, The Donalds Hair Show, etc.

      If you can't find "Reality TV", you ain't a lookin!

    122. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God you're gay. Star Trek sucked until Enterprise came along. This last season has been awsome.

    123. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw the Darmok eposide as the writers running out of ideas for new episodes. That was definitely my least favorite episode of the whole series, and I loved TNG.

    124. Re:Good news... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      it's better than nothing

      Not when it screws with the entire history/timeline of the series and seriously inhibits the work any future writer could do to weave a coherent story in the Star Trek universe.

      My hope for the franchise would be to take a few years off and then come back with something very different. Perhaps a show done from the prospective of one of the 'bad' alien races.


      -Colin

    125. Re:Good news... by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just saying I hope it's cancelled soon.

      Then you shouldn't be offended when people call that mean spirited. You are wishing for something to be done that will not help you at all, but will hurt others. And if you are really wanting it to be canceled so that another, better Star Trek show replaces it, keep in mind that the worse this one does, the lower the chances there will be another (and the longer before it comes out). Instead, if you want another Star Trek, you should hope this one takes off and they will do the CSI/Law and Order thing and have them running multiple concurrent versions of the show.

    126. Re:Good news... by badasscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's well written, well casted, and I wouldn't mind seeing more of it.

      It's improving. It's no longer the unmitigated disaster it once was. The episode a few weeks back where T'Pol was wrestling with her addiction was really nicely done, and it was the first one I ever thought that about. (The episodes since have been pretty good as well, for the most part.) I have to say, Jolene Blalock is sure nice to look at, but she's also really excellent as a vulcan, and specifically as a tormented vulcan, which has always seemed really tough to pull off. Even Leonard Nimoy, the original, seemed to force it whenever he was given the task of showing emotion.

      I'm still not very into this whole Xindi plotline and I hope they'll do something more recognizable on the Trek timeline next season. But it does seem like the writers have finally started hitting their stride within the framework they've been given so far, the actors are fine (and in some cases excellent), I've gotten used to the show's "look", etc.

      I guess I'm saying I'm happy it's coming back, which I wouldn't have been after last season. I just hope they create a plot arc next year that's a bit more Trek-like.

    127. Re:Good news... by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Those issue based episodes ruined it the worst. If I wanted to be preached at, I would watch TBN instead of TNG! The problem with TNG is that it tells you what to think so that you don't have to.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    128. Re:Good news... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      5) WTF were Ferrengi doing in Federation space in Archer's time? They were unknown in Kirk's day!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    129. Re:Good news... by Unworthy+Advocate · · Score: 1

      Darn, If only I farted more. I could be eligible for greatness.

    130. Re:Good news... by jedaustin · · Score: 0

      For me Fridays work perfectly, I can watch it after work and then go out.
      As long as it doesn't compete with Star Gate SG1 :)

      Where I live (Phoenix) Enterprise is often preempted by some sporting event I could care less about. Hopefully in the new timeslot that won't happen as much.

      As far as the show.. I think it's pretty good.
      I like that they aren't inventing some new technology every show (though it would be cool to 'find out' where all of the technology we know of came from) and using the transporter constantly to get them out of a jam.
      I like that there isn't a 'prime directive' or a lot of the stuff in the 'later shows'. They're going to have to work at making this show 'fit' into the rest of Star Trek but I think they can do it. Since they're doing a lot of time travel stuff they can do anything, even things that violate what we already know about the future.. and have an episode later that wipes it away from history.

      I think Scott Bakula has done a fine job compared to other captains such as Kate Milgrew (Janeway) or Avery Brooks (Sisko). Some of the other characters are so-so.

      Tucker has had his share of episodes lately to give him more depth, but Malcolm Reed is a flat character.. they need to flesh him out. Same with Mayweather, he may as well be the red-shirted crew member. If either died today I wouldn't care.

      T'Pol has become an interesting character with the addiction and emotions lately but I hope they don't over do it. I'd love to see them explain how spock happened, though they had the perfect chance on the recent episode where they met the future enterpise that was sent back in time.

      Hoshi is a somewhat interesting character, though I think she's 'too good' sometimes. I'd like to see a few episodes where they get into major crap for mis-translations/etc.

      Phlox is sort of interesting, but I don't honestly care about his character. The EMH on Voyager was more interesting.

      For the most part I liked Voyager, especially the borg episodes. What I didn't like were all the retarded Kess episodes that reminded me of Crusher the wonderboy on STNG. It was a little too emotional for me. Though 7of9 made up for a lot ;)

      DS9.. I hated it, except for Odo and a few other characters. All of the religion, un-engaging war, and pointless episodes had me turning it off too much. Though some of the better parts of DS9 should be incorporated into other Trek series.

      One of the coolest episodes for me was when they brought back the Andorans from the original Star Trek. If Enterprise were to meet the changlings, bajorans, Trill (in some weird host), or any of the 'new' aliens from 'later' Star Trek series earlier in their history it would be interesting.
      Just leave out 'Q', please!

      How about meeting the borg before they became the borg, say a society that went heavy on the cybernetic implants. This could be one of the best series yet, just for the posibilities.

    131. Re:Good news... by jcrash · · Score: 1

      OMG Man, You scare me.

      --
      I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. Isaac Asimov (1920 - 1992)
    132. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat got your tounge? A few cards short of a deck? Pocket pool? All more difficult to understand then "shaka when the fell" or an outsider.

    133. Re:Good news... by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DS9 was the best series, hands down. Sisko, the main character, confessed to cold-blooded murder, and says to the camera that he'd do it again. Where else in trek have you seen that without some kind of sickening remorse trailer at the end with a huggy-huggy moral lesson?

      You're attracted by the flashy graphics and dime-a-dozen half naked chicks. Fine. Some of us want that, and a decent storyline too. The fact that people like you are in the majority are the main factor contributing to the suckiness of trek today.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    134. Re:Good news... by cshark · · Score: 1

      I'm still not very into this whole Xindi plotline and I hope they'll do something more recognizable on the Trek timeline next season. But it does seem like the writers have finally started hitting their stride within the framework they've been given so far, the actors are fine (and in some cases excellent), I've gotten used to the show's "look", etc.

      Good points. Have you noticed how a lot of the in door sets they've been using lately pay homage to the original series? Like the Xindi chamber last week for example. God I'm a nerd. Sitting on Slashdot talking about the nuances of star trek stage design. Never mind.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    135. Re:Good news... by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      Because some of us remember when Star Trek wasn't just an excuse to sell toys and keep "camera men, editors, and janitors" in jobs.

      Sorry, pal, but in Hollywood, it's always about the money. Always. Even if something is making money, it'll be brushed aside in an instant (Firefly, Futurama, too many examples to count) if the network executives think they've got another program that can make more money.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    136. Re:Good news... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      Show off.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    137. Re:Good news... by jedaustin · · Score: 0

      DS9 was the best series, hands down. Sisko, the main character, confessed to cold-blooded murder, and says to the camera that he'd do it again. Where else in trek have you seen that without some kind of sickening remorse trailer at the end with a huggy-huggy moral lesson?

      Granted, SOME DS9 episodes were pretty good (like the one you mention). However, all of the 'emmisary' episodes lost my interest fast. Too much religion. Too tied to the space station.

      You're attracted by the flashy graphics and dime-a-dozen half naked chicks. Fine. Some of us want that, and a decent storyline too. The fact that people like you are in the majority are the main factor contributing to the suckiness of trek today.

      Nothing wrong with half naked chicks, though they need some depth. All the the Dax characters were pretty but totally uninteresting for the most part. All of the 'Old Man' references made me cringe. There were a few episodes like the one with her in the the Klingon battle that were good though. I think Klingons have been overdone in StarTrek, I hope they give them a rest for awhile.

      The naked chick factor went a little far in the early episodes. The T'Pol sonic shower scenes were a bit over the top for me. Fortunately they don't have those every episode. I remember thinking "Oh Crap.. if my wife walks in here IM DEAD".

      I just want them to tell good stories.
      I'd like to see them make some enemies like the Romulans.

    138. Re:Good news... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      It just seems so mean-spirited to wish for a show's cancellation-- over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people.

      Look, if a show is cancelled, they don't just switch off the transmitter for an hour in its timeslot. They put a different show on. If Enterprise is cancelled, then that frees up resources - time, people, equipment, money - for something else. Now that something else might be even worse, but it might be way better. Either way, we'll never get to see it because the Star Trek franchise is being milked to death. So, yes, I do want to see Enterprise cancelled, and I don't expect anyone to lose their jobs apart from the dismal writers and producers.

    139. Re:Good news... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      How about "Goatse.cx - When the image formed!"

      Could you move a wee bit faster for that?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    140. Re:Good news... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Sucks to have your friends....

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    141. Re:Good news... by ionpro · · Score: 1
      ...and DS9 never "went there" so to say.
      Oh, really? What would you call, well, basically any of the alternate universe stories with the Intendant (aka Kira)? Or Sisqo and Dax in the alternate universe? Now that I think about it, though, I don't recall any sexual act actually being performed on screen, just strong implication. But no more or less then what was implied in the T'Pol/Trip scene in Enterprise
    142. Re:Good news... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      # Chain of Command (TNG - Picard is captured and tortured by Cardassians - another fine performance by Stewart)

      There... are......... FOUR... series...!!

    143. Re:Good news... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard that people really _arent_ watching it, and that the only reason it's still on air, is because so much money has been thrown in to it already.
      They're wanting to get to the 100 episode mark which is apparently the benchmark by which a series is considered to have succeeded.

      I heard this from one of the writers at a SF/Fantasy convention...

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    144. Re:Good news... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      Because the ones that like Ep. 1 & 2 where children.

      :-)

      Heck, I *enjoyed* the movies and I can tell they're crap. But I'm a sucker for lightsabers. ;)

      It's like that news story a month or so ago about the cow/goat/whatever that ate the bag of diamonds. You know you're looking through crap but it's worth it for the sparkles.

      :-D

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    145. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A is the product of four and the sum of three and six.

    146. Re:Good news... by joeharrison · · Score: 1

      I agree... DS9 was outstanding. Espically the last season

    147. Re:Good news... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Kirk would always bend the Federation rules for good moral reasons, the same goes for Picard. It seems like the Archer character will do anything to accomplish his mission, morals be damned.

      What rules? As Enterprise was being planned, the theory was that all those rules haven't been written yet... and the reason they WILL be written is to prevent reoccurences of mistakes Archer will make.

    148. Re:Good news... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      However, all of the 'emmisary' episodes lost my interest fast.

      And since that includes the very FIRST episode, I gave up on the series 30 minutes in.

      Too tied to the space station.

      They spent tons of time away from it; that wasn't really a problem. In fact, if they'd be MORE tied down, it would've been better. The episodes were generally no more connected to one another than in previous serieses on the USS Enterprise. Orbiting one planet permanently should've been an opportunity to experiment with some continuity.

    149. Re:Good news... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      It's not even like the show and it's characters were trapped on the station

      The show was designed so that the Wormhole could bring the cast to a new planet each week, while still keeping the orbital station.

      It basically succeeded at that function- but it's too bad they had to resort to that scheme at all. If the series had been MORE about Bajoran+Federation+Cardassian+Dominion relationships in that one system, and LESS about "new alien or subspace phenomena each week", it could've been great. But instead, they basically kept to the same zero-continuity pattern established in previous Trek.

      Sometimes, those sorts of stories can be best told when you have people coming to you, rather than the other way around.

      Worked for B5. Too bad DS9 couldn't have been a more accurate copy.

    150. Re:Good news... by bSMfh · · Score: 1

      I concur. Darmok was #1 best story ever.
      in the pure entertainment category, that DS9 episode that was spliced into the TOS tribbles story was really great too. Haven't seen that
      one mentioned.

      Somebody clone Gene and get him back to work!

    151. Re:Good news... by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

      Well, it may be worse than nothing, but its better than Voyager.

      Are you saying that nothing is better than Voyager? :p

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
    152. Re:Good news... by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I don't recall any sexual act actually being performed on screen, just strong implication.

      I don't have a problem with sexual acts -- I have a problem when they are handled in a immature manner that only a horny male teenager (of UPN's target demographic) wound find attractive.

      Example: Rubbing each other down with gel to "de-con" because of a technobabble excuse (no biofilter on the transporter yet?)
      Example: Seven of Nine announcing "Take off your clothes" to Kim.
      Example: Torres and what's-his-face-random-redshirt-of-the-week Vulcan duking it out because both of them are in "heat" due to technobabble reasons (Pon Farr and wtf was the excuse for Torres? She practically threw herself at every male member of the crew in that episode). Could we get any more childish if we tried?

      Lest you think I'm unfairly targeting Enterprise or Voyager I would also point out the TNG episode "Menage a Troi" where the producers found a convenient storyline excuse (Fergeni don't allow females to wear clothing) to strip Deanna and Lwaxana Troi. But TNG generally tended to avoid such excesses -- TNG usually had the affair of the week in many episodes (nothing wrong with that) or actual (*gasp*) relationships, like: Troi and Worf, Picard and Daren and of course Troi and Riker.

      I don't have a problem with nudity either -- it worked quite well when Picard was stripped by his Cardassian captors to be tortured -- or when Q appeared naked on the bridge of the Enterprise stripped of his powers.

      My problem is with immature demeaning pieces of T&A that are only tossed into the episode for the sake of satisfying the horny male demographic that keeps UPN alive.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    153. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry have to disagree here. In this one case something is not better than nothing.

      People will get more work, and probably more rewarding work.

      Firefly rules and is a prime example of how dumb Fox is.

      -W00t!

    154. Re:Good news... by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      Actually, the camera people shouldn't have any problem finding new jobs. Raw skills like film editing and production are easily transfered. It's the actors who often have problems finding work.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    155. Re:Good news... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that- the Enterprise this season on terrorism (the one where the terrorist Sphere Builder Worshipers took control of Enterprise to go kill those who believe it took 9 days to build the Spheres- only to find their home planet had been wiped out by the Jihad when they were away) really hit home considering the current War on Terror. No, I don't know the name of the episode- I'm not THAT big of a fan.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    156. Re:Good news... by mhyden · · Score: 1

      The problem with "improvement" is that Enterprise is already stained in the minds of a lot of viewers, myself included. I don't like that cast (although Scott Bakula is cool no matter what he does, he's Scott Bakula). I don't think they have characters I can identify with, they don't have very interesting storylines, and every other episode ends with the crew being exactly where they were at the beginning of the episode. There aren't messages; everything gets taken care of in the last five minutes. So, even if it starts getting really good, I won't know, because I won't be watching it, and that's probably the case with other fans like myself. The sooner they get it off the air the sooner they can all devote their efforts to finding out why it sucked so bad, and creating a show that we'll be nuts over like NextGen.

      --
      I support Mac For the Masses
    157. Re:Good news... by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      why not just say 'a is 36'? :p

      nah, really, there are ways to do it that aren't very clunky. Perhaps "a is the sum of three and six, four times" or "a is four times the quantity three plus six" would work. Both convey the appropriate meaning concisely and leave little room for misunderstanding.

      On the same note, I've read that the classical Greek mathematicians used no shorthand in their works. That's really sobering when you consider how much of our understanding of algebra and geometry can be traced back to them.

      Personally, the thoughts in my mind as I read resemble mathematical shorthand do not resemble the shorthand. It is simply too abstract for me to internally digest without translation into meaningful ideas. (incidentally, I've recently been introduced to group theory and while it is clearly useful in the context which its been introduced -- QM in a chem class -- I find myself really unnerved by the seemingly arbitrary shorthand on which it is established)

    158. Re:Good news... by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Many people (myself not included) would rather have nothing at all than something they don't like when it comes to their favorite TV shows / movies / etc.

      Because what comes after can be so bad, it destroys what came before.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    159. Re:Good news... by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      The episodes were generally no more connected to one another than in previous serieses on the USS Enterprise.

      You obviously never watched it then. The entire last 3 seasons were tightly tied in the Dominion War story arc, with only occasional episodes stepping directly outside of that arc for plot (and even then, there was still always a tie to current events), and Bajor figured prominently in a large number of stories as well, particularily the political side.

      It wasn't quite Babylon 5 as far as how tightly the episodes were tied, but close.

    160. Re:Good news... by jnicholson · · Score: 1

      Quite true. There were moments when I was sure Archer was about to come up with the Prime Directive... (shudder)

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
    161. Re:Good news... by QangMartoq · · Score: 0
      ..SFX are a dime a dozen. Good stories are much harder to find.

      Good stories, hard to find? Let's try to find a few then, shall we?

      TOS

      "Where No Man Has Gone Before" "The Naked Time"
      "The Enemy Within" "Mudd's Women"
      "The Corbomite Manuever" "The Galiileo Seven"
      "Tomorrow Is Yesterday" "Space Seed"
      "Errand Of Mercy" "Operation: Annihilate!"
      "Who Mourns for Adonias?" "The City on the Edge of Forever"
      "Mirror, Mirror" "Metamorphosis"
      "The Trouble With Tribbles" "The Ultimate Computer"
      "Assignment: Earth" "The Enterprise Incident"
      "And the Children Shall Lead" "Day of the Dove"
      "The Savage Curtain" "All Our Yesterdays"
      "Turnabout Intruder"

      TNG

      "Code Of Honor" "Where No One Has Gone Before"
      "11001001" "Coming of Age"
      "Heart of Glory" "Symbiosis"
      "Elementary, Dear Data" "Loud as a Whisper"
      "A Matter of Honor" "The Measure of a Man"
      "Pen Pals" "Q Who?"
      "Peak Performance" "The Survivors"
      "Who Watches The Watchers?" "The Bonding"
      "The Enemy" "The Price"
      "Deja Q" "A Matter of Perspective"
      "Yesterday's Enterprise" "The Offspring"
      "Sins of the Father" "Tin Man"
      "Hollow Pursuits" "The Most Toys"
      "Sarek" "The Best of Both Worlds"

      I'll stop here, as my point is undoubtedly made. Enterprise, like all the series that preceeded it, has its good and bad stories. To me, more bad than good, but it does have undeniable potential.

    162. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Enterprise is not my favorite flavor of Trek, but it's better than nothing.

      Better than nothing? I disagree. How can something bad be better than nothing?

      I would rather have had only Alien and Aliens, or have the Terminator series stop at the second movie, than have had the terrible sequels. But too many fans felt like _anything_ was better than nothing, so the crap that is T3 and the rest of the Aliens series got made. And don't get me started on the Star Wars fans that wouldn't leave well enough alone and insisted Lucas _had_ to make those prequels.

      (And of course, these same fans who scream for sequels/prequels/etc. are the first and loudest to complain when the material is awful.)

      Sometimes you have to stop while you still have a good product. If you keep going, you'll just lower the overall quality associated with the brand. Trek would do well to go on a nice, long hiatus, then restart with totally fresh blood.
    163. Re:Good news... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1
      You obviously never watched it then.

      True, I didn't have enough pain tolerance to watch it closely (I saw all of the 1st 3 episodes, though)

      The entire last 3 seasons were tightly tied in the Dominion War story arc, with only occasional episodes stepping directly outside of that arc for plot

      However, when I heard DS9 was going off the air, I did begin tuning in again. And I found that its Dominion War section was only slightly more continuous than TNG had been in the Borg War or Cardassian War sequences.

      For the specific test of continuity, look for enforced ordering between episodes. Find pairs of episodes and see if they could be swapped in order without introducing a "temporal anonmaly". Even in the last season, most of episodes could be shuffled freely. And each prior season, there were usually just 2-3 "gateway" episodes that mark a transition from one phase to another:
      1. "Now the Dominion is fighting us, and my camping trip is ruined!"

      2. "Doh, you're not slimey anymore"
        "That fireball-throwing Cardassian has made me 15 years younger, but I'll still be here with you guys, even though re-association is completely against the rules"
        "Ooh, Voyager came out. So I'll talk like a Vulcan from now on!"
        "Ooh, A movie is out. New lame costumes for everybody!"


      The last 3 seasons were overall only connected insofar as they had a different backdrop than the first 4.

      I suppose there's actually a simpler check for continuity: When an episode starts, do you hear a narrator say "Previously on..."?

      That happened almost 100 times on B5, but less than 20 times on DS9 (the longer series!)
    164. Re:Good news... by mhyden · · Score: 1

      That was one of the few episodes I saw, and it really bugged me, it was so canned, so "can't we all just get along?" The episode tried to draw a parallel to our own warring religious factions by pointing out - omg, how clever - that there were some inconsequential differences in their otherwise identical beliefs. But what do they expect, that we'll go, "Oh! How terribly silly we are! Come, my new Arab friend, have some McDonald's with me!" Instead they cheapened a real-life issue that claims lives and families and countries by making sure we knew exactly what the "moral of the story" is. That's why I can't stand this series.

      --
      I support Mac For the Masses
    165. Re:Good news... by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

      WTF?

      Flamebait? For this?

      It was an honest opinion for christ's sake. No flames - Just an honest opinion answering a question.

      --
      _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    166. Re:Good news... by mhyden · · Score: 1

      The only message I get from that commercial is "if you pirate movies, we'll blow up your car" Anyway, aren't all those employees paid in advance of the movie going to theaters? Or did some poor janitor in Gigli wait four months for an eight-dollar paycheck, because the movie bombed?

      --
      I support Mac For the Masses
    167. Re:Good news... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      The storyline episodes you mentioned were definately the highlights of TNG. Patrick Stewart gave so much to the series, it's no wonder that he took over from John Frakes as the main character (watching the first season you can really see that Roddenberry expected Frakes to be the new hero Kirk-replacement and Stewart as more of a secondary character).

      I'm pretty sure "The Inner Light" won some awards in fact. Certainly "Inner Light" and "Darmok" are some of the best science fiction to come out of Star Trek in its new guise. The concept of an entire civilisation using a probe to shoot memories into another being as the only way for it to survive even in part is definately in the SciFi bin.

      I have to say I'm biased though because I'm actually enjoying Enterprise quite a bit. It's certainly better than the early seasons of DS9 or Voyager. I could never get used to those Kazon pine-cone heads. The actors show great quality in Enterprise, and the technological fix isn't always there like it used to be in the earlier Star Trek series. And no first contact!

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    168. Re:Good news... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      No, here's why it's important that enterprise doesn't get cancelled.

      If they cancel it, they'll use the money to make another reality show. Big brother. American Idol. Choose your own hell.

      I'd much rather watch bad trek than reality, any time.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    169. Re:Good news... by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result, and I'm not talking about high-paid actors, I'm talking about camera men, editors, janitors-- normal people. It's not fun losing a job, folks.

      Not sure that's a good basis... as, well, theoretically, if they lost their jobs on enterprise, they'd then get jobs working for a new show that might be better...

    170. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an episode in TOS that was similar, but better, and wasn't really about religion but ethnic differences that seemed irrelevant to an outsider, but meant the whole world to the aliens, even in the end.

    171. Re:Good news... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      Chain of Command (TNG - Picard is captured and tortured by Cardassians - another fine performance by Stewart)

      One cannot mention this episode without:

      THERE...ARE...FOUR LIGHTS!!!!!

    172. Re:Good news... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      DS9 was the best series, hands down.

      Here is one complicated reason why I think DS9 was a pile of shit: They never made a connection between the Tosk and the Jem Hadar.

      One is an artificially created repitillian race that does not eat or sleep and that can become invisible at will, and they know who created it and where they live.
      The other is an artificially created repitillian race that does not eat or sleep and that can become invisible at will whom they needed, for matters of life and death, to learn more about.

      They never went to the creators of the Tosk, hell, they never even mentioned the Tosk beyond season one!

      I have more, but that one sums it up: They did not follow the implications of past events within the series, and they plagiarised so much that they even did it to themselves. That cannot be the best trek has to offer. Go watch "Best of both worlds" again, I think you need to.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    173. Re:Good news... by cfuse · · Score: 1
      It's not that Lucas "ruined" anything. It's that Episode 1 and 2 were crap! ...

      I beg to differ. Because of the miracle of DVD, Mr Lucas can go back and fuck up the originals as well (um, who did fire first again? Greedo or Han).

      Lucas learn this little trick from his friend Spielberg (walkie talkies instead of guns). The only thing that Spielberg has been involved in lately that didn't have an emetic effect on me was AI. And that's only because the unholy hand of Kubrick was reaching from beyond the grave to poison Spielberg's attempts to sugar coat a film which is essentially a monument to the vileness of human behaviour. Haley Joel Osment is brutalised by every human in the movie in one way or another, I loved it.

      If there was any justice in the world, Spielberg would be struck dead on the spot, and Lucas would develop incurable cancer and repent for inventing Jar Jar Binks on his deathbed.

    174. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer to see both you trolls stfu.

    175. Re:Good news... by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

      Enterprise is better this year. They really changed the whole look and feel of the show. Colors and textures on the set are darker. The Captain has more of an edge, and is no longer a simple minded do gooder. And the resident sexpot has held up well. I am even starting to find her attractive!
      Moving it to Friday nights would be a bummer, but the olde VCR still works fine.

    176. Re:Good news... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      And the real life issue is what, exactly? That they call God Allah? Or that their governments repeatedly blame us for their failures, while giving the good ole' Americans military bases in the middle east?

      In the long run, what does it matter? When the oil in the desert is long gone, as it certainly will be in the next 40 years no matter how this war turns out, what will this conflict have been about? Is it really worth commiting genocide over (which is the only way we'll ever be able to win the "War on Terror")?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    177. Re:Good news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an advanced topic, way beyond warp propulsion. It's more like...

      "They've gone to plaid!"

    178. Re:Good news... by mhyden · · Score: 1

      Listen, I totally agree with you, I think the entire conflict is based on really stupid and inconsequestion differences, but it's not the sort of thing that Scott Bakula can just gloss over and solve for us in a hour's program. The tone of the episode is so self-congratulatry, like, "aren't we clever? we figured out your little problem, don't you feel silly." Next Gen had their little moral outbursts, too, but they were more general, not exact copies of present day issues, with just the names changed. And the tone of Next Gen was never condecending or smirky like the Enterprise "moral of the story" is. I think if they're going to make SUCH an obvious connection, it needs to be with the admission that there may be more to the issue than what Archer makes of it in five minutes.

      --
      I support Mac For the Masses
    179. Re:Good news... by mhyden · · Score: 1

      whoops, the above was supposed to be a reply to Marxist Hacker, not myself. d'oh!

      --
      I support Mac For the Masses
    180. Re:Good news... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, I didn't see most of the first season until after the fact, and kinda muttled through most of it with not much else to do... was about 3/4 way through the second season, and I thought to myself "damn" this is starting to get interesting... and most of the 3rd season has been entertaining. I've liked this season pretty much in every episode. I do hope they at least to get a "closure" to the series, rather than a "sudden cut" like farscape did.. that was another series that took a while to smooth out.. same with B5... I like scifi, and enterprise is getting to be close to my fav. of the genre... I also happened to like DS9, but that is just me.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    181. Re:Good news... by HybridJeff · · Score: 1
      So it is entirely possible that nobody likes it, and the advertisers perceive it to be a set of palatable stories to wrap around their corporate messages.

      No it isnt, Ill admit to liking the show. I'll admit it could be alot better, but when I look at most of the crap that aires these days it faires pretty well.

    182. Re:Good news... by BlueMud · · Score: 1

      I think I can be included in that group. However, I revel in the badness of really bad sci-fi. I find it entertaining to see just how bad it can get. Typically, the really bad ones try to cover up by adding scantily clad women. For me, it is mildly distracting, but more fun if they get eaten by the low-budget cg/clay super-monster. Who needs a plot when you can see half naked women get eaten by cartoons?

  2. Theme Song by crapnutassneck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please tell me they are leaving that dreadful theme song behind.

    --
    .-=Wit is educated insolence=-. -Aristotle
    1. Re:Theme Song by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Please tell me they are leaving that dreadful theme song behind. "

      Boy do I wish this stupid complaint would finally die.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Theme Song by dave420 · · Score: 1

      "Thirty-Something in space". awful.

    3. Re:Theme Song by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I still mash down the Mute button on the remote everytime that ridiculous theme song comes on. I have no idea what they thought they were doing - alluding to the use of "Magic Carpet Ride" in one of the STTNG movies perhaps?

      What's more strange is that they knew how much people hated it and not only didn't replace it, but somehow made it even *worse* in season 3 by adding a drum track.

    4. Re:Theme Song by Skater · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm gonna go out on a limb: I think the theme song is the best theme song ever written for any series. It captures the mood of the series perfectly. The first time I heard it I didn't like it, but then as I watched the opening sequence again I realized what they were trying to do and how well the song fit.

      All good art is controversial. ;)

      --RJ

    5. Re:Theme Song by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Why? So many people dislike it, maybe the concern is VALID? How many complaints about a bad thing must there be before people admit... maybe it really is... bad? Does it become less bad just because we've learned to tune it out or ignore it?

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    6. Re:Theme Song by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's a valid complaint. TNG, DS9 and Voyager had wonderful symphonic themes, that were themes for the rest of the musical score in the show. Enterprise has horrible music. Rod Stewart has as much to do with Star Trek as Snoop Doggy Dogg.

      Dammit, now Gin and Juice will be the theme for the next series.

      DAMN YOU BERMAN!!!

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    7. Re:Theme Song by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I just tell myself that the real theme song is the one played at the end over the credits.

    8. Re:Theme Song by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot: where if enough people agree, your opinion can be wrong.

      --

      I write in my journal
    9. Re:Theme Song by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

      Please tell me they are leaving that dreadful theme song behind.

      I loved the original theme song for Enterprise and thought they changed it for the worse at the beginning of this season. Which theme song don't you like? The original one, or the season three theme? Or both?

    10. Re:Theme Song by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dammit, now Gin and Juice will be the theme for the next series.

      These are the voyages of the starship Escalade...

    11. Re:Theme Song by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      The problem with the theme song is it's emotionally manipulative/dishonest, and thats what you sense as being terrible about it.

      The Big Idea (tm) was to show man's struggle to expand himself and put a sappy but well produced pop song over it (the guy who sang it is actually quite famous in south america) :) So from memory, the theme song starts with sea ships, then to actual space missions, then to imagined moments in the future which were pivatol to space flight. Thats where the idea breaks down, You feel the majesty of the old sea ships, you feel the pride of the NASA missions, but the synthetic future moments provide at best, synthetic emotions :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    12. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had just gotten used to it when they changed it (slightly). Now I hate it again.

    13. Re:Theme Song by Viceice · · Score: 1

      I agree... But at least, that had a concept. The upbeat they did for season 3 is just plain horrible.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    14. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were going for the feel of the "don't want to miss a thing" song from that astroid movie.

      When I first heard the Enterprise song I thought it sounded like the "don't want to miss a thing" and sure enough, it turned out it was written by the same dudette.

    15. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enterprise is probably 2nd on my list after TNG for favorite trek series, but I agree... the theme sucks, and it probably would have been more popular without it. Furthermore I think the whole introductory bit with the space shuttle and ISS and then the enterprise is a bit cheesy... just MHO.

    16. Re:Theme Song by chfriley · · Score: 5, Informative

      >the theme song is the best theme song ever written for any series

      I agree it is good, but it wasn't written for the series. ;-)

      It was on the Patch Adams soundtrack in 1998. (They re-recorded it for Enterprise and I like the re-recording better than the Rod Stewart version).

    17. Re:Theme Song by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Actually I've only seen one episode, and don't plan on watching any more, but I rather liked the opening song. A little cheesy, but nothing wrong with that.

      TNG, DS9 and Voyager had wonderful symphonic themes

      TNG had a wonderful symphonic theme. DS9 and Voyager had flat, boring symphonic themes.

    18. Re:Theme Song by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Why? So many people dislike it, maybe the concern is VALID?"

      Is it really so valid? Will Enterprise suddenly become a better show for it? Uh, no. Are you going to sit through an extra 2 minutes of the show every single ep? Uh, no.

      " How many complaints about a bad thing must there be before people admit... maybe it really is... bad?"

      I'm not defending the song. I said I wanted the complaint to die, not that I wanted everybody to agree the song is good. The complaint has been around since day one, there's no reason for it to change, and some git always gets modded up for making a stink about it. "I want to bring up a 3 year old complaint, see how Insightful I am?"

      My point? The complaint is just as irritating as the song. Get over it. Complain about the show being boring, if you like. Complain about T'Pol being addicted to an exotic metal, if you like. You can even complain about how the time travelling dude only shows up when it's dramatically interesting. But damn, why you gotta harp on something so bleeding old? Whine whine, bitch bitch, moan moan, I'm righteous. Yeah.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      controversially dull?

    20. Re:Theme Song by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "It's a valid complaint. TNG, DS9 and Voyager had wonderful symphonic themes, that were themes for the rest of the musical score in the show."

      It's also a complaint that's been around for 3 years and comes up every single FUCKING time a story about Enterprise comes up. Let it die. It's redundant, tiring, and there's nothing new to discuss here. "I just remembered, I don't like the theme song, bow to my insightfulness!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:Theme Song by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...its five year mission, to style and profile, to seek out new sources of bitches and money, to boldly go where no pimp has gone before. /cue visual FX of "The Star Ship Enterprizzle," newly pimped out by West Coast Customs (drop down LCD screen!), as it slowly cruises past a planet. Snoop blasts from the racks of interstellar subs mounted on the rear decks, and the neon mounted on the underside of the ship casts a funky purple glow across the planet's surface.

    22. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate people that use winky-smilies, they tend to be overly-emotional sappy brats.

      Kinda like anyone who likes that genre of soft-rock adult contemporary garbage.

      Die.

    23. Re:Theme Song by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Please tell me they are leaving that dreadful theme song behind."

      There's an FAQ out there for the cartoon series Transformers. If you read the FAQ, there's a question about an acronym (the term of it escapes me at the moment) that defined an argument that would never disappear. There were two characters that were physically very similar, just different colors. (Rumble and ... Frenzy I think? The little tape dude whose arms turned into smashy things...) In the cartoon, the blue one was Rumble, and the black one was the other dude whose name I can't recall. In the comic book, the colors were reversed. The comic book people thought they were right, the cartoon people thought they were right. Result? A never-ending argument that just wound people up for no good reason.

      Every time somebody mentions the Enterprise theme-song, I think of that FAQ. Why? Because the color of that particular Decepticon doesn't mean a damn thing to the show or the comic book. Everybody's right, yet it still goes absolutely nowhere. It's just some point for people to butt heads on.

    24. Re:Theme Song by slickepott · · Score: 1

      I certainly like the song but I agree the guitars changed it in a way I didn't like. Mainly I think the guitars start too early. Just my thought.

    25. Re:Theme Song by corsican · · Score: 1
      Point of order: You're right; Rod Stewart has nothing to do with Star Trek. He also has nothing to do with Enterprise's theme song.

      The song was written by Diane Warren. It is performed at the beginning of Enterprise each week by Russel Watson. It was only performed by Rod Stewart on the Pach Adams soundtrack. Russell Watson sounds a bit like Rod Stewart because he is nothing but a mimic. He got famous singing opera by mimicking opera singers. Whatever song he sings, he imitates the person who sung it first and critics think he is great. Ooo, such talent.

      Russell want a cracker?

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    26. Re:Theme Song by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm gonna go out on a limb: I think the theme song is the best theme song ever written for any series. It captures the mood of the series perfectly. The first time I heard it I didn't like it, but then as I watched the opening sequence again I realized what they were trying to do and how well the song fit.

      I'll admit I loathe it less than I did when the show first started. However, it's still a dumb song, and it actually got WORSE with season 3. Not because of the "jazzing up" of the music, but because they changed the premise of the show!

      The musical style doesn't fit Trek. The video sequence, however, fits perfectly. That's good. The first half or so of the lyrics do sort of fit the idea for the first two seasons. (Vulcans won't stop us from getting out in to space like my daddy wanted me to, yee haw! --John Archer) The second half ("faith of the heart" repeated over and over again) is just plain dumb, and also doesn't fit Trek.

      But then Berman decided that exploring and defying the Vulcans by being all exploration-like "wasn't big enough". So instead, let's throw in a terrorist plot (it's the in thing) and then rip off a 1980s computer game (no one will remember it) after wasting a third of season 2 building up the Klingons and doing nothing with it (because it's like, we can say Duras a lot, Trekkies know that name, right?). And then we keep the theme music that no longer is even tangentially related to the overall plot arc of season 3!

      That makes about as much sense as anything else Berman has done. That is to say, none. Fire Berman and his team and hire some REAL writers (DC Fontana, Diane Duane, Diane Carey, Peter David, all old Trek hands who "got it"), and maybe Trek will start not-sucking again.

      --

      --GrouchoMarx
      Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    27. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hate people who post inflammatory garbage anonymously; they tend to be cowardly fuckwads.

      Kinda like myself :-)

    28. Re:Theme Song by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny
      that dreadful theme song
      I think the theme song is the best theme song ever written for any series. It captures the mood of the series perfectly.

      Yes, the dreadfull theme song does indeed capture the mood of the series perfectly ;-)
      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    29. Re:Theme Song by crapnutassneck · · Score: 1

      I guess the big difference would be that the colors of the transformers did not make me want to get up (can't find the remote) and change the channel.

      --
      .-=Wit is educated insolence=-. -Aristotle
    30. Re:Theme Song by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Wow, this really irks you. How many comments have you replied to with this? Perhaps you should take your own advice, and just get over it?

    31. Re:Theme Song by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1
      Dammit, now Gin and Juice will be the theme for the next series.

      I can just see it now:

      With so much drama in the U-F-P
      It's kinda hard being Star Fleet's C-in-C
      But I, somehow, some way
      Keep comin' up with funky-ass tactics almost every single day.
      May I kick a little somethin' fo' tha Cadets
      And power some nacells for my warp-drive jets
      Warp nine-point-two and the party's still goin'
      'Cause the Borg ain't home
      I got green-skinned bitches gettin' it on
      And they ain't leaving 'till stardate 89.547
      So what you wanna do? (sheeeit)
      I got a tripped out holosweet and my admirals do to
      So reduce ambient lighting and close the airlocks
      But what? We don't know no Doc Phlox
      So we gonna "make it so" like that
      Shields up, hoes down, while you ensign f*ckers bounce to that

      And I'll be warpin' down the quadrant smoking indo
      Sippin on synth and juice
      Laid back (with my mind on my latinum and my latinum on my mind)

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    32. Re:Theme Song by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: where if enough people agree, your opinion can be wrong.

      1) Your opinion can't be wrong on Slashdot, only unpopular and at worst, modded down.
      2) Your opinion can't be wrong in the real world, only unpopular and, at worst, causing you to get shot. Or tortured. Or get a plane flown into a building.

      I'll take Slashdot to be unpopular, thanks.

    33. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an FAQ out there for the cartoon series Transformers. If you read the FAQ, there's a question about an acronym (the term of it escapes me at the moment) that defined an argument that would never disappear.

      Yes, it's P.A.T.H.E.T.I.C.

      As in isn't it truly PATHETIC that people argue about transformers. I wish they would F.U.C.K.O.F.F.A.N.D.D.I.E.

    34. Re:Theme Song by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps you should take your own advice, and just get over it?"

      Wow, his comment really irks you. Perhaps you should take your own advice, and just get over it, and not respond to his comment?

      If you find that suggestion unacceptable, then I suggest you look for a different way to try to dismiss his point of view. Implying he's a hypocrite just isn't going anywhere.

    35. Re:Theme Song by PMuse · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Next poll: Best Space Show Theme Song:

      Babylon 5 - Christopher Franke

      Battlestar Galactica - Stu Phillips

      Buck Rogers - Stu Phillips

      Doctor Who - Ron Grainer

      Farscape - SubVision

      Firefly - Josh Whedon

      Futurama - Danny Elfman

      Red Dwarf - Howard Goodall

      ST:DS9 - Dennis McCarthy

      ST:Enterprise - Diane Warren

      ST:TOS - Alexander Courage

      Stargate - David Arnold & Joel Goldsmith

      I Wanna Be a Cowboy Neal - Boys Don't Cry

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    36. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get over it. It's just a song.

    37. Re:Theme Song by PMuse · · Score: 1

      The Enterprise theme song is nice, to be sure, but my vote goes to Firefly.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    38. Re:Theme Song by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


      It's not actually very similar-one is argueing about some inane facts, the other is argueing about whether a piece of music makes people want to throw up. One is trivia, the other is a disagreement with a major artistic decision in the show.

    39. Re:Theme Song by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Who here thinks 'Magic Carpet Ride' would have been a better theme song?

      I didn't have any issues with it at first, but the new drum track sounds goofy.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    40. Re:Theme Song by Torqued · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has anyone else noticed the rather phallic imagery of the Saturn V launch just as Jolene Blalock's name is displayed? :)

    41. Re:Theme Song by jbuilder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They re-recorded it because of dollars.

      Rod Stewart gets paid for each time his version of the song is played. He costs MUCH more than Russell Watson does...

      --
      Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
    42. Re:Theme Song by whats_a_zip · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll admit it too. The theme song has grown on me too, but *gasp* I liked the slower version.

    43. Re:Theme Song by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      It's sad how the amazing video of Enterprise was overshadowed by the music debate. It really is the best intro, way better than showing the ship fly past.

      Which they even did on DS9, where it made no sense. Show us Bajor, damnit. Show us Cardissia Prime. Show us the inside of the wormhole. I understand not showing people, it's a good thematic choice, but DS9 actually had locations they could have shown.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    44. Re:Theme Song by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "One is trivia, the other is a disagreement with a major artistic decision in the show."

      Yes, it's easy to distinguish them that way, especially when your heart is already set on hating the Enterprise theme song. To those who just don't care either way, it's really not all that different. It's still needlessly nitpicky. It's still a waste of effort. It's still mind-numbingly dull.

    45. Re:Theme Song by Rupert · · Score: 1

      I liked the *first* re-recording better than the bass-heavy version their running now.

      I agree with the grandparent. It took a while to grow on me too. Probably because it's so unexpected in the context of a scifi show theme tune.

      Of course, my Star Trek-related musical tastes are somewhat unusual. I also like Scott Bakula's recording of Pig Island.

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    46. Re:Theme Song by Merlinium · · Score: 1

      then you obviously have not heard the Theme song for Firefly!

      --
      If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
    47. Re:Theme Song by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      UPN is reviving "Homeboys from Outer Space"???

      Now *THAT* is a sci-fi series I could get behind (unlike Enterpoop).

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    48. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dreadful spelling captures your dreadful wit perfectly.

    49. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Snoop blasts from the racks of interstellar subs mounted on the rear decks,

      Obligatory lyric: Who let the Klingons out? Worf, Worf!

    50. Re:Theme Song by Skater · · Score: 1

      I did, too! Definitely don't like the jazzing up they did...

      --RJ

    51. Re:Theme Song by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      Rod Stewart did NOT write that song - it was written by Diane Warren.

      She's also responsible for "I Don't Wanna Miss A Thing", performed by Aerosmith for the Armageddon soundtrack.

      "Faith of the Heart" may be a good song to some, but I agree that it is misplaced in a Star Trek show.

    52. Re:Theme Song by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      The theme to DS9 made me sleepy. Voyager was similar. TNG at least gets out there and grabs you.

      I haven't made up my mind about Enterprise yet. It's okay, but the guy sounds constipated...even if he is some famous opera singer.

    53. Re:Theme Song by fcw · · Score: 1

      ITYM:

      Futurama - Christopher Tyng

    54. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rod Stewart has as much to do with Star Trek as Snoop Doggy Dogg.

      Does this mean you think that only trekkie artists should be allowed to participate in Trek series? How stupid.

      Even stupider, the theme is sung by Russell Watson, NOT Stewart, you MORON. It only says so during every episode's opening credits.

      And besides, before they added the awful tambourine and other instruments, Enterprise's theme song was THE BEST STAR TREK THEME EVER

      It fit perfectly with the premise and feel of the series, which I also think is among the best in the Star Trek franchise.

      Dumbass.

    55. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that it is misplaced in a Star Trek show.

      Then you're both wrong.

      Dumbass.

    56. Re:Theme Song by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      I would have agreed with you the first two seasons. But I got the impression that they revamped it for season 3 just to piss of the few who actually thought the theme was good initially! Can we expect some swing for season 4, or maybe a salsa!

    57. Re:Theme Song by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      FIRRIB, amongst others.
      "Frenzy is Red, Rumble is Blue."

      Of course, Rumble was NEVER blue. The toy was red, and the cartoon model was purple.

      The toys, incidentally, were identical aside from the colors. Same molds and everything. Same deal with Laserbeak and Buzzsaw, Bluestreak and Smokescreen, Prime and Magnus' cabs, Starscream, Skywarp, and Thundercracker, and so on.

      Silly fans.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    58. Re:Theme Song by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      The visual sequence matches the series motif perfectly (who are those guys in the 60's astronaut/cosmonaut clips? Are they real period video clips, or actors?).

      The song is too trite and borders on moronic.

      They should get Brian Eno to write a theme song for the visuals.

    59. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downright Hilarious. Thanks man.

    60. Re:Theme Song by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      At least it's better than Voyager's theme!

    61. Re:Theme Song by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Enterprise has horrible music.

      What you ment to write as, you don't like the music. Some do.


      Rod Stewart has as much to do with Star Trek as Snoop Doggy Dogg.


      Good thing he has nothing to do with Star Trek then.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    62. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If she's responsible for that piece of crap Aerosmith song, she has no place writing any more music. That song sucked.

      Excuse me, I think that song sucked, some people might actually like it.

    63. Re:Theme Song by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Futurama - Christopher Tyng

      Right you are. Elfman = Simpsons, of course.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    64. Re:Theme Song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THis is the one criticism of Enterprise that I wholly agree with. Personally, I like the continuing character development and the maturing of the show and cast... as ALL ST series have gone through. (Watch the first year of TNG .. it was awful).

      However.. the Opening theme music (song) of Enterprise is TERRIBLE and significantly impacts the show right out the gate.

      Fortunately, I live in Okinawa Japan where we don't get the show on TV... so I download the latest episodes off the net, and I'm able to skip through the opening and get right to the meat of the program!

      Happy to see a Fourth Season! Cheers to UPN for taking a little risk.

  3. Friday night? What are they, crazy? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Funny

    We just know how Star Trek fans are all out paintin' the town red on Friday nights.

    What UPN should do is just send small cheap TV sets to every collectible card shop in the country, so fans of the series can watch the show while playing Magic: The Gathering in the back.

    While they're at it, they should send some Red Bull and Cheetos, too.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasn't a 'party night' schedule (along with horrid season three scripts) part of what killed the original series? Wow, even sci-fi fans can have lives...

    2. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Damn, I want some free Red Bull and Cheetos with my FNM!

      I'm just tired of running into the same bloody Ravager Affinity decks, week after week...

      Back on topic, Friday night is a really shitty timeslot. Shows have two kinds of fans: those who watch it because it's decent and they can find time to watch it, and those who watch it no matter what. It really kills your 'casual' audience, who's out having fun, leaving you with only the 'hardcore' audience.

      And a bunch of the 'hardcore' audience is at Friday Night Magic. Well, that's probably not accurate. FNM can't seriously dent a show's audience, at least no more than any other Friday night activity (mmm..beer)

    3. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      VCR's man, VCR's (yes I could record my shows on my computer, or download them, but I prefer watching my movies/shows on TV with my nice BOSE surround sound speaker system) :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by MCraigW · · Score: 1

      We just know how Star Trek fans are all out paintin' the town red on Friday nights.

      Are you kidding? Since we're too geeky to actually talk to a girl, we always go out to the local Internet café on Friday nights in hopes that some girl might say "Hi" to us.

    5. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      What kind of self-respecting nerd uses a VCR nowadays? DVR man, DVR!

    6. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We just know how Star Trek fans are all out paintin' the town red on Friday nights.

      And how many real star trek fans actually watch the show?

      Infact, this is horrible! Now when I stay home without a life there will be nothing else to watch BUT enterprise!

      Oh the inhumanity....

    7. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      The kind with a fat TV system? Sides whose talking about self-respect, I need to keep my level of nerdiness to a specific point so the girlies don't run away cause of the geekiness factor :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    8. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Rofl.

      Friday night is probably about just as bad as any other night on UPN.

      Personally I never believed they would cancel it anyway. Lets face it, UPN without Trek would be like Comedy Central without John Stewart. Its their identity (well that and Moesha spin-offs)

      I remember when UPN first started braodcasting, they pimped Voyager hard for about 6 months before. I don't remember anything else from that first season lasting more than a year or two. I'm not a trekker by any means but I was watching DS9 at the time and thought it was really cool, so I had some hope for Voyager during the first season, just like I did Enterprise, but eventually you have to admit when something sucks big hairy ones.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    9. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by fireduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i agree. there's really nothing wrong with Friday nights, as long as there is consistency. Its when TV shows get moved mid season to a different night that viewership really plummets. (like when Babylon 5 was switched weekly to different nights)

      X-Files was on Friday nights for several years and it slowly moved from cult favorite to mainstream hit. If I recall correctly, the reason it was moved to Sunday was to make room for Millenium, and that was 3 or 4 years after X-files debuted.

    10. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by radish · · Score: 1

      Errmm....trying to keep it "retro" or something? VCRs have horrible PQ compared to a decent PVR, they are harder to use, require crap like changing tapes, and certainly don't impress anyone.

      As for acceptance by the fairer sex, my GF loves the fact that she can call up the latest episode of Spongebob from the living room or the bedroom or wherever...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    11. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by corsican · · Score: 1
      I, personally, don't own equipment in order to "impress anyone." I own equipment that works and impresses me. It doesn't make sense for me to buy a "decent" PVR system which requires a monthly subscription cost (or you can drop a grand or two and make your own, but you lose a lot of the functionality of the subscription-based services) when I can get a VCR for 20 bucks. As for quality, unless you drop another several grand for HDTV, it makes no difference.

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    12. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by rleibman · · Score: 1

      I don't remember anything else from that first season lasting more than a year or two.

      Or anything since. Man, I can remember some of bad shows they tried to see if they would stick just because they were science fictionish:
      7 Days... crap!
      That one with the monsters running amock... crap
      Why the hell can't they pay a tiny amount of their budget to a good science fiction writer is beyond me.

    13. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      B5 was on at a regulary scedualed time it premiered at 1am monday into tuesday night on the local Fox station. No they didn't try and kill that never all the new shows run once a week a 1am. Friday night shouldent kill Enterprise the show will do that all by itself. And yes I think the theme song stinks my guess is they were to cheap to get a realy symphony to do real music.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    14. Re:Friday night? What are they, crazy? by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      Does anyone at Viacom even think? Putting Enterprise on Friday nights. Hmmm... what other Star Trek can be found on Friday nights? How about four hours of Deep Space Nine, on SpikeTV?

      Doesn't really matter to me though, since my local Fox station provides Enterprise, at 6pm on Sundays. My parents have it worse though; It's usually Saturday night at 11:30pm on their CBS affiliate, but sometimes it gets bumped to midnight or 12:30am for infomercials.

      --
      End of Line.
  4. Woot! by dealsites · · Score: 1

    UPN is one of my favorite channels lately, and definately more so now. Far more interesting that watching "reality" TV. That crap is so fake. Those shows will end up killing the bigger networks.

    --
    New deal processing engine online: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals.html

    1. Re:Woot! by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

      fake tv shows like star trek are much more realistic :)

      I agree, STE is better than any of the crap on fox, besides the cartoons of course.

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    2. Re:Woot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you insentive clod, I don't get UPN. I have to download my Enterprise Episodes. Since the start of the series, I'm glaad I have broadband (and bittorrent). How much is it to ask to have a UPN station 100 miles from Houston. Heck, even one pumped in from huston but no Cox couldn't do that.

      T.

    3. Re:Woot! by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      Unfortunantly, the masses will prove you wrong. Check out some of the recentNielson ratings. American Idol and Survivor take the top 4,5,6,8, and 11th spots. Not to mention the huge Jerry Springer craze, as well as MTV's real world. I think TV Ratings do a lot to show why a pure democracy would be a catastrophic failure. I rest a lot better at night knowing that only 55% of the population voted in the 2000 election, as I can at least hope most of those not voting were sitting on their couch watching re-runs of Jerry Springer and Real World. It is also a good arguement against making voting any easier than it already is. I think people should be made to go to some trouble to vote, so that those who know nothing about the candidates and really don't care anyway are naturally weeded out.

    4. Re:Woot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you've been enjoying quality programming like The Mullets and America's Next Top Model?

  5. why? by untermensch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do they always try to drop shows when they reach their peak?
    I'll be the first to admit that Enterprise doesn't live up to the standards of TNG or DS9 but IMHO Season 3 has been much better than the first 2 seasons.

    1. Re:why? by yabos · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Voyager took a while to get good and for Janeway to drop the stone wall act(somewhat atleast). Hopefully they won't kill the show off and blam low ratings because they moved it to a bad night.

    2. Re:why? by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me preface all this by saying that I've barely watched ANY of Enterprise. Looking back on ALL Trek-related series (heck, any series worth mentioning in general, actually), they all pretty muched sucked UNTIL about 3rd season or so. Look back on TNG--HORRIBLE overacting until the character's got settled.

      Who knows--maybe it's just gonna take Enterprise another season to pull out of the tailspin...

    3. Re:why? by MCraigW · · Score: 1


      Did DS9 have a babe in a skin tight suit? That was the redeeming quality of Voyager, and it makes Enterprise more interesting. I just wish the Marines would beat up more aliens. Of course TNG had Counselor Troi in her cute one-piece, but it wasn't quite revealing enough to increase the ratings...

    4. Re:why? by DCowern · · Score: 0

      I'm not a HUGE fan of the season 3 story arc (it's all a bit far flung) but I think they would have done better if they just stuck to it the entire season.

      Towards the beginning of the season, we had 2 or 3 episodes setting up the arc for the rest of the season and then ... 2 or 3 episodes that had nothing at all to do with the story arc. They did nothing to move the plot forward and barely (if at all) mentioned that Earth had been the subject of an unprovoked sneak attack.

      Now that the season is nearing the end, the last bunch of episodes have stuck to the arc and have overall been pretty good*.

      * with the following exceptions:

      - The "future" (past?) Enterprise - that was just campy, lame, and predictable. Captain from the future comes back and will stop at nothing to ensure that past mistakes do not repeat themselves and in the process almost screws up the present mission even more - yeah, I've never seen or heard of that plot before... BZZZZT WRONG.

      - Flox's new Vulcan methodone clinic. For the love of baby jesus, could they have thought of anything more inane and pointless to just throw in there? Yeah, she's spent a lot of time around humans and no time around Vulcans for the past 3 years - she's acclaimating and changing as a person. We don't need to turn her into a frikken junkie to account for that.

      This has Berman's filthy, uncreative, unimaginative, bastard hand written all over it. It's like your boss coming in and looking at your web application and saying "Where's the blinking words? I saw a website once that had words that BLINK. I think it's a good way to draw people's attention to our message (or better yet "mission"). Add some right away."

      Thank you, I'm done venting now. =)

    5. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyager got good? When was that?

      Seriously, they could show the reruns in random order and nobody would notice.

    6. Re:why? by red+floyd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Did DS9 have a babe in a skin tight suit?

      Four Words:

      Jadzia Dax
      Kira Nerys

      (or alternatively)

      Terry Farrell
      Nana Visitor

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    7. Re:why? by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry to reply to myself, but two more words as well...

      Chase Masterson

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    8. Re:why? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Troi had to be the sickest, supposed to be hot, woman of all the ST series. I just don't understand how people liked her. She had a huge ass, and ugly face, topped off with stupid hair cuts all the time.

    9. Re:why? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      You forgot: Ezri Dax (Nicole DeBoer)

      No, she was no Jeri Ryan, but Nicole was a cutie. The only episode Terry Farrell looked good was the time travel/tribble episode. (And day-am, the best babes were on Star Trek: TOS.) Nana Visitor struck me as a mean, yapping poodle.

      Yeah, that was one big minus of DS9, lack of real babe-age.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    10. Re:why? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Nicole DeBoer, minxy

    11. Re:why? by antizeus · · Score: 1
      Did DS9 have a babe in a skin tight suit?
      The dabo (sp?) girl that ended up marrying Rom. Leeta or something.
      --
      -- $SIGNATURE
  6. Wonderful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure all 3 fans will be happy

  7. Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by proverbialcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should be more worried about being on UPN. Buffy fans can tell Enterprise fans what that's like.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      UPN in part suffers from being related to CBS in the company food chain. All truely good shows go to CBS, UPN has to eat from the leftovers.

    2. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      As a big Buffy fan, I'd have to ask: should they be concerned that their big star is going to get tired of the same thing after 7 years and decide to move on to something else? I don't have the ratings numbers sitting in front of me to reference, but I don't think that there was a significant drop-off during the UPN times (I may stand corrected on that, though).

      Buffy might've had another two seasons in it, tops, if Sarah Michelle Gellar hadn't decided that she wanted to do something else.

    3. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cable company doesn't even carry UPN. There is a local FOX TV station that carries Enterprise Sunday at 12:30am.

    4. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      I don't have the ratings numbers sitting in front of me to reference, but I don't think that there was a significant drop-off during the UPN times

      I note that you didn't say ratings went up. Remember, Buffy went to UPN because the producers wanted more $$ per episode, and WB couldn't make the numbers work. So, Buffy went to UPN, UPN couldn't make any money, and wasn't planning on renewing. SMG not renewing HER contract with a show that probably wasn't going to be around was just smart business. It let her go out with a little bit of class, and gave the show an easy way out.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    5. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      Definitely true. I guess my tone there didn't communicate my opinion well, but I was simply half-truthfully replying to a joke intimating that it was UPN who killed Buffy. The show had a nice long run, and the UPN jump let it do a couple of things that might not have otherwise happened, but it was in the same sort of territory as any middle-of-the-road sitcom or drama when the move happened anyway. UPN makes plenty of asinine programming decisions, but it's not necessarily a kiss-of-death, and Buffy started on a network that has that same rep.

      I would've agreed in the second point as well; SMG certainly could've made a reasonable case that she was trying to avoid typecasting, or that she was burned out, but I'd have been surprised if the show lasted past one or two more seasons.

    6. Re:Friday isn't the worst of their troubles by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

      You might be the only person who understood that I was joking. :)

      Ah, the joys of Slashdot moderation. When I joke, I'm modded "insightful". When I'm trying to be insightful, I'm modded as "flamebait." When I flame, I'm modded "funny."

      Cheers.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  8. Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I read that they made a deal for a couple of million bucks to have Jar Jar come from an alternate dimension to visit Enterprise. How incredibly sad for a good franchise. Lucas is spreading is lameness to Trek, Roddenberry must be spinning in his grave.

    1. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's not all, they're going to mention it in SW:Ep3 somehow. "Me visit primitive people called Humans" or something. I'm just revolted at the whole thing. No way I'll watch Enterprise or SW:Ep3 if that's indeed the case.

    2. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said the same thing a few minutes before you but was modded as a troll?! Unbelievable, one of the darkest bits of news to hit the Star Trek franchise and people call it down.

    3. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has JarJar been confirmed? There was talk of someone from the first Star Wars eps making a visit but no one could find out who it was. ANYONE but JarJar, please UPN!!!

    4. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Jar-Jar visit has been confirmed. I'm just sick about it. They've completely sold out.

    5. Re:Seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Cool it on the boldface, fella. We all know it's horrible news but there's no need to scream about it. Write email to UPN and LucasFilms, hopefully they'll come to their senses.

    6. Re:Seriously... by corsican · · Score: 1
      Can we get a link to something official on this? Somehow an AC saying "yes, it's been confirmed" doesn't carry a lot of weight with me...

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
  9. Don't compare Firefly to the crappy Enterprise! by apophenia · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    Firefly was actually well written and acted...
    Enterprise is just horrid.

    1. Re:Don't compare Firefly to the crappy Enterprise! by tgd · · Score: 1

      I was a big Firefly fan, but I have to take exception to that... Firefly was very well written and horribly acted. Enterprise was written -- well, like any Trek -- and is acceptably acted.

      And seeing T'Pol with just her undies on makes up for any of the bad acting!

    2. Re:Don't compare Firefly to the crappy Enterprise! by mafryler · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree (well at least about Enterprise being horrid).
      In fact, one can draw strong parallels between the early seasons of Enterprise and TNG.
      IMHO, the first two seasons of TNG were rough to say the least. The characters were completely overacted and campy, not unlike a former series bearing a similar name. In fact most TOS fans despised TNG. But then sometime in the 3rd season things turned around culminating with the BOBW Part I. After that episode (and BOBW Part II), the series skyrocketed. The characters became more normalized and the writing improved dramatically.
      I see the same thing with Enterprise. I believe the last half season or so has been as strong, if not stronger than the end of the 3rd season of TNG. The Xindi storyline has been excellent. The idea that the Captain's primary job is to stop a device from destroying his home world at any means has proven to be very compelling - especially when certain lines have got to be crossed in order to accomplish the ultimate goal.

      I really wish more people watched the series. I really believe the show has a lot of promise.

    3. Re:Don't compare Firefly to the crappy Enterprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a lot of promise"

      really going out on a limb there, huh? Thing is Firefly actually made it worth watching TV. Star Trek never did. And i love sci-fi.

    4. Re:Don't compare Firefly to the crappy Enterprise! by Gorath99 · · Score: 1
      I was a big Firefly fan, but I have to take exception to that... Firefly was very well written and horribly acted. Enterprise was written -- well, like any Trek -- and is acceptably acted.
      Really? So far (the show hasn't ended yet over here), I've found the acting in Firefly to be above average, while I find much of the acting in Enterprise absolutely horrible. Especially Scott Bakula is easily worse than any of the actors in Firefly.

      And seeing T'Pol with just her undies on makes up for any of the bad acting!
      This, however, I can only agree with :-)
  10. Re:Enterprise will be back by neoform · · Score: 2, Insightful

    don't watch it then.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
  11. Re:Angel final episode Wednesday night at 9PM by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

    Yah, wish UPN would pick up Angel like they did with Buffy. It's a quality show, sucks to see it going out so soon.

  12. Let Trek Die With What Dignity It Still HAs Left. by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please, just put us out of its misery. The last two series have been horrid crap. Let Star Trek fade into myth with what little dignity it still has left.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  13. Fridays at 10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is how NBC killed ST:TOS...

  14. Re:Lucas and UPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Yeah, Lucas' people confirmed someone from the first 3 episodes would appear but never said which. Jarjar? Ug..

  15. UPN has holes on Friday night... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fridays are definitely a death slot on the UPN network. Many UPN affiliates, even some the network owns, have Friday-heavy packages to air games from the local MLB team. Stations affected include...

    Boston's WSBK "UPN 38" which airs "Friday Night Baseball" Red Sox Games nearly every Friday night in the season.
    Connecticut's WCTX "UPN 8" is part of the Mets broadcast network.
    Seattle's KSTW "UPN 11" is the flagship of the Mariners broadcast network.

    In short, it's hard to get anything to work on UPN Fridays during the start of the TV station because about a quarter of the network just plain falls apart on any given Friday night due to baseball coverage when its in season.

    1. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by LordGibson · · Score: 1

      Though fortunately the baseball season largely coincides with television's summer off-season.

    2. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      sorry but Wednesday nights suck just as bad... Basketball preempting it 9 times out of 10... Hell I get suprised when my Mythbox has one listed as they preempt the stuff as well as the "saturday night rerun" they also do every week.

      Today it's required to have a PVR that can do a "season pass" function like Mythbox that will record episodes but keep a database of ones you watched so it tries to not get them again. Because it seems that networks enjoy moving things around almost randomly.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by aligas · · Score: 1

      I watch UPN on one of the three mentioned stations.

      When they preempt a show for some reason they re-schedule the program for later in the week. Usually our local TV Guides and Sunday paper inserts reflect these moves, so they're not just sprung on us.

      The rescheduled date/time varies, but Saturday nights tend to be the usual choice. I've never seen them just outright skip airing an episode of any show.

      They have also been running Enterprise on Sundays at 8pm in addition to its usual Wednesday 8pm slot. I don't know if they will continue doing this, but they have been doing it for a while.

      Between the two airings my TiVo has never missed an episode, even when they move it all over the place.

    4. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by seamarfan · · Score: 1

      No, KSTW UPN 11 is not the flagship of the Mariners broadcast network. They will show 40 games as opposed to Fox Sports Northwest which will show over 100. Also, KSTW is only broadcasting 5 games on Fridays, two of which have already occurred, and and the other three are all so earlier that they *should* be done by the time Enterprise would air.

    5. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Wednesday is at least a guranteed safe spot during baseball. ESPN's deal with MLB prevents any OTA stations from airing games during Wednesday primetime.

      But you're right, Basketball is still likely to poke holes on Wednesdays...

    6. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Fox Sports Northwest is the Mariners cable network. KSTW is the biggest station airing Mariners games when they're over-the-air games, which makes them the flagship of the broadcast network.

      Cable is still not considered broadcasting in some circles.

    7. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      However, airing a program in eratically scheduled slots (even if there's an "If Baseball then..." logic to it) shakes loose fair-weather fans and hurts the overall rating. TiVos fix this problem, but not everybody has that.

    8. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Fridays are definitely a death slot on the UPN network.

      I think not. Friday night is when all those who don't have dates can now fantasize about doing the wild-thing with Vulcan babes with pointy tits.

    9. Re:UPN has holes on Friday night... by seamarfan · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but I'm gonna agree with the Mariners 2004 media guide.

  16. Re:Enterprise will be back by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "But it'll still be awful. "

    Those who've been watching this season would disagree with you. I remember similar things being said about DS9 in season 3 as well.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  17. Re:EXCEPT THEY REPLACED THE CAST WITH NEGROES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, presumably they'll include a token white guy, you know, because the future is diverse.

  18. How am I going to program my VCR now by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

    If Enterprise, Joan of Arcadia, and Andromeda all share the same time slot?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:How am I going to program my VCR now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy. Unplug the VCR, turn off the TV, and find something to do besides watching crappy shows.

    2. Re:How am I going to program my VCR now by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      DirecTV DVR with TiVo.

      Record / Record. That gets Andromeda and Joan of Arcadia. Pull out the rabbit ears (or another DirecTV reciever) and watch Enterprise live.

  19. YAY by AcmeShells.com · · Score: 0

    YAY.. Oh and if you don't like it then don't watch it and STFU

    --

    AcmeShells.com The cheapest Eggdrop
  20. Maybe they can fix the resolution too by konfoo · · Score: 1

    instead of upconverting 480i to letterboxed HDTV resolution like they are currently doing in major markets.

    1. Re:Maybe they can fix the resolution too by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Enterprise has been posted in HD since the start of season 2, and it's been broadcast in HD since last winter.

      If your local UPN affiliate isn't equipped to broadcast HD, call them, don't bitch to Slashdot.

      --

      I write in my journal
  21. In other news... by jht · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thousands of Enterprise fans will, after celebrating, move back into their parents' basements to plot their next letter campaign.

    But first, a celebratory all-night Magic: The Gathering game! Bring on the dancing girls! (oh, wait...)

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  22. What's wrong with Friday? by ncc74656 · · Score: 0
    It looks like 'Enterprise' might be moved to Fridays next year, and Firefly fans can tell you what a great place that is..."

    IIRC, The X-Files aired on Fridays (except for maybe the last year or two), and it did fairly well. With VCRs, TiVos, etc., I'm not so sure that it matters when a show airs.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    1. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by Uhlek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The X-Files was also given several years to blossom on Friday nights, and was a signature show for the Fox network -- which didn't (at the time) demand such high ratings for a television show. Friday nights had the ability to produce those kinds of ratings -- not the ones they want now.

      Once Fox became a "big" network and started demanding more of X-Files, they moved it to Sunday nights, where it became even more popular than it was on Fridays.

    2. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Ah, but this is a glimmer of hope for FireFly. It seems that all you need to get renewed on UPN is to have Star Trek in the title, not any connection to any of the other series'. This is what I suggest:

      Star Trek: FireFly

      Simply do a global replace in the scripts, changing `Core' to `Federation' and UPN will love it. Of course, they can change it back for the DVD release, so everyone will be happy...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by aligas · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The "larger" Fox has gotten, the more impatient they have become.

      They have bee trying to solve the "Friday Night Mystery" for a few years now. Last year they canned John Doe in favor of putting Boston Public in its timeslot.

      Now I'll admit that Boston Public was on its last legs, but it had an established following. Regardless of that, the show managed to bring in lower ratings then John Doe did.

      Ratings wise even the new TGIF lineup on ABC is a mere shadow of its previous incarnation. Networks just can't seem to get people to tune in on Fridays anymore.

      My guess is that networks will start to use Friday nights as a testing ground. See how a series starts to play out and gauge how the public reacts to it. If it looks like it could really work (ala X-Files), then move it to a "real" timeslot.

    4. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by bonch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, I don't know anybody who owns a Tivo or who is going to fire up a VCR every Friday night.

      Hell, I barely know anybody who has VCRs anymore instead of DVD players.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      You are not the target audience. The majority of their target audience don't stay in and watch tv on friday nights.

    6. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Who'd you define as their target audience then?

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    7. Re:What's wrong with Friday? by corian · · Score: 1

      The majority of their target audience don't stay in and watch tv on friday nights.

      But then again, most of the audience who can afford to go out (at leat) once a week probably own VCRs. So still, time and date of the week doesn't especially matter. What matters is the quality of the show. If the show is really worth watching to you, you'll spend the effort to make sure to watch or tape it. If the show sucks, you won't.

      As far as this show is concerned, most people find the opening theme song crappy enough to change the channel or mute the darn thing. That's audience attrition. Those who record the show, and can fast forward through the sap, are probably more likely to end up watching the show.

  23. Re:Lucas and UPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From what someone at UPN said, the Enterprise franchise and the Star Wars franchise are both losing interest. They figured this sort of cross-promotion would work. They're someone going to tie in JarJar's visit to Enterprise to Episode 3.

    I have NO idea how they'll pull that one off.

  24. The Horse is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    sorry but i think Star Trek has been sufficiently ruined past the point of no return don't you ?, shame what greed in the 21st century does to a idea

    1. Re:The Horse is dead by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      You mean the shark has been jumped!

  25. Not just Firefly... by Hoarke42 · · Score: 1

    Fridays killed Dark Angel too. It was doing pretty well on Tuesday. I think someone didn't think about their target demographic in that case...

    1. Re:Not just Firefly... by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

      Forgive me fellow reader, but it wasn't the time-slot that killed "Dark Angel". It was the purile scripts and what appeared to be a sea-change in the writing. When they made Jessica Alba a walking plauge-bearer and brought in the circus performers to play various hybrid-human failed experiments, and after they brought her character back to life they had super-balled several times over the shark-pool. In the end, the show was about as relevant and interesting as wet toilet paper.
      That's what killed it.

      --
      Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    2. Re:Not just Firefly... by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Actually, what killed it was Firefly. Just sayin'. ;-)

      (Taken from a cached copy of the Dark Angel Newsletter)

      DARK ANGEL CANCELLED!!!!!
      People couldn't believe the rumor that came out Wednesday, but it was confirmed on Thursday morning when FOX announced their fall schedule. FOX had canceled Dark Angel in an 11th hour deal to keep Firefly on the air. This was a huge shock to all those involved especially since Dark Angel had its contract signed for the third season and was on the fall schedule up until Tuesday night.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  26. Really has become a great show by armentage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enterprise certainly did stink to high heaven during season one and most of season two, but lately it's really taken off. If it can keep up its momentum and improve the "sci-fi" aspect of the story lines, it could really become one of the best ST spin-offs yet! (Excluding ST:TNG, you can never hope to beat it) What makes the new episodes of Enterprise so great are the continuing, evolving story line. Granted, its no Babylon5, each episode begins where the previous one left off, and they have actually been doing some character development! ST extras that tend to die after 5 minutes of screen time have been replaced with guest characters that last two or three episodes before biting it. Antagonists have risen to the ran of Guest Star, much like Gul Dukat and Gherak did on DS9! Enterprise has really had a huge turn around from its early crap episodes. Give a try, watch a few episodes. You might actually enjoy it.

    1. Re:Really has become a great show by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 2, Funny

      So it's become a Soap Opera for lonely geeks?

    2. Re:Really has become a great show by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While TNG did have some good episodes, it would be easy to beat it. About half of the episodes were so liberal-preachy that it made me want to puke, and about half of the episodes involved no real plot except some piece of technology breaking (transporter, holodeck, etc.) (yes I know that doesn't leave any room left for good shows in my numbers, there is overlap between those two sets). The main thing about TNG, and even more so with the original Star Trek, is that you had what actually seemed like real interaction among the cast. You got the feeling that Kirk, McCoy and Spock were real people, and were actually friends; the same holds true with the TNG crew. On Enterprise, there really hasn't been any character development at all. I have watched most of the series, but couldn't really tell you anything about any of the characters, and can just barely remember their names. That is its real problem.

    3. Re:Really has become a great show by corsican · · Score: 1
      Speaking of guest stars, anybody elses catch Casey Biggs (who played Cardassian Damar, Gul Dukat's right-hand man in DS9) as the alien captain that Archer stole the warp drive from a couple of weeks ago?

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    4. Re:Really has become a great show by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Actually, it was season 1 of Enterprise that I thought was the best. Yes, it was mediocre, but its the only season where there were episodes I liked. It pretty much sucked after season 1. I haven't even bothered trying to catch up to the latter half of the season 3 episodes. (That's how bad it is.)

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    5. Re:Really has become a great show by Blimbo · · Score: 1

      "Give a try, watch a few episodes. You might actually enjoy it"

      The problem is Its hard to pick up because of the ongoing plot lines. I had the same issue with DS9, if you missed a few episodes often it was just not that great to watch.

      With TNG and TOS each show (pretty much) was a stand alone and could be appreciated as such. Sure there was character development and inside jokes and such to enjoy if you followed it closely, but no need to watch them in broadcast order to get full enjoyment.

      That's what i dont like about Enterprise, I dont mind interesting plot arc, but whne i tune into it i feel like i have no idea whats going on and end up watching something else.

    6. Re:Really has become a great show by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The main thing about TNG, and even more so with the original Star Trek, is that you had what actually seemed like real interaction among the cast. You got the feeling that Kirk, McCoy and Spock were real people, and were actually friends; the same holds true with the TNG crew.

      Rick Berman has said in interviews that he thought that that was what was wrong with TNG: The people getting along.
      According to him, what makes a show interresting is conflict. So he wanted to make better shows by removing all that camaraderie from the show and having crews that did not get along.

      Like the Maquis and Starfleet on Voy...that turned out great didn't it?
      And now enterprise...

      I've been saying it for over ten years, I'll say it again: Rick Berman must die.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Really has become a great show by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      The same holds true for other TV shows too, not even remotely related to Star Trek. The perfect example is Friends. I didn't like it, but my little sister used to watch it all the time, and the only thing I could really see that it had going for it was that the cast actually did seem to be friends. Even she would admit that most of the writing was crap, and that the jokes weren't even that funny. I don't know how much of this is just because people work better if they view their coworkers as friends, or if people just would rather see people on TV who are friends; probably a little of both. On the downside for the studios though, if the cast are actually friends in real life, you get stuck with collective bargaining.

  27. create a new series already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before "Enterprise" was announced as a replacement for Voyager, I was hoping that one of the more amusing Voyager epsidoes - one involving the "USS Relativity" creating all manner of time havoc - would have been the likely candidate.

    Perhaps because the set of the Relativity looked more permanent than most - but given the insane plot loops available in any time based episode - why the Star Trek creators didn't co-opt Dr. Who in full-series form has always confused me.

    Perhaps it also explains why I couldn't visualize Scott Bakula in a new series for that matter.

  28. Must be a new liptick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for that turd.

  29. It will still be 11:00 Friday for me by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This one has always been a struggle to watch. Our local Fox affiliate has a "secondary" affiliate relationship with UPN, which means that they show a few UPN shows at odd times, and the cable company would be fined if they brought in an actual UPN affiliate.

    So it is shown usually at 11:00 pm Friday, but sometimes the Fox station moves it without telling anyone. Not only that, they replace the "next episode" teaser with ads for their own WWE shows. I hope someday that CBS shuts down UPN and moves the couple/few UPN shows worth saving to the regular CBS schedule.

    This Fox affiliate actually showed the UPN show "Dilbert" only at 1:00 AM Sunday morning. I kind of wanted to see that one.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. Friday's fine with me by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    It looks like 'Enterprise' might be moved to Fridays next year

    That won't be so bad for me. No real UPN station here; Star Trek: Enterprise is carried in syndication on a Fox affilliate on Sunday evening as the only airing in the week. First UPN airing on Friday means less spoilers to avoid and better chance to take part in discussions while interest is still high.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  31. Long live the 1980's !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how embarrasing

  32. w00tage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WAZOO, it's got another season! :)

  33. Re:Angel final episode Wednesday night at 9PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UPN has squat for a lineup right now and don't have a whole lot in the way of money. Plus, who the hell wants to show scripted programs when you can show crap reality TV for a fraction of the price?!

  34. Incredibly common with Star Trek by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This happens all the time with Star Trek for some reason; they never start out well. The first season of TNG was particularly terrible. The most infamous example being "The Naked Now", where the crew (with their standard Star Fleet issue miniskirts) became 'drunk' from an anomaly and Data had sex with Tasha Yar.
    Conflicts with the Romulans and the Borg didn't heat up until about season 2 or 3, although Q did have his fair share in the beginning.

    DS9 had a more successful start, but didn't get really interesting until Season 3 when The Dominion were introduced.

    In every Star Trek series there seems to be a counter-evil they perpetual battle, ie.
    Star Trek TOS - Klingons
    Star Trek TNG - Romulans
    Star Trek DS9 - The Dominion
    Star Trek Voyager - The Borg

    And with Enterprise it's the Xindi, but you start to feel the redundancy. Trying to out-evil Cardassians or the Borg is going to prove challenging.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    1. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by gowen · · Score: 1
      The first season of TNG was particularly terrible. The most infamous example being "The Naked Now", where the crew (with their standard Star Fleet issue miniskirts) became 'drunk' from an anomaly and Data had sex with Tasha Yar.
      That was pretty much my favourite episode. It was tongue in cheek, it was funny and it showed characters who actually resembled real people, as opposed to cardboard cut-out whiter-than-white federation gimps sleepwalking through the latest cliched Good triumphs over badly-made-up Evil battle....
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by benzapp · · Score: 1

      And with Enterprise it's the Xindi, but you start to feel the redundancy. Trying to out-evil Cardassians or the Borg is going to prove challenging.

      Well, you clearly haven't been watching the show. The Xindi are hardly the simplistic archetypes of evil here. If anything, the story since the introduction of the Xindi is more like the Illiad: neither is good or evil, but they are fighting because they have to.

      Recent episodes have clearly established that the Xinid and the Earthlings will be friends someday.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    3. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by corsican · · Score: 1
      I thought the premier was stupid. At the end you have a couple of giant space jellyfish having a tender moment (when they zoomed in to show the tentacles touching I screamed, "Aw, come on!"), and Counsellor Troi (Counsellor? An official post on a starship?) standing there crying in her miniskirt/tunic telling us what to feel ("Love! And great joy!" ). It was the worst attempt at emotional manipulation I had ever seen.

      Then came The Naked Now. The first regular show after the premier, and they ripped off a TOS episode?!? Come on, Gene; at least give us something original to start with! Things didn't look good for the franchise.

      But it did get better. Much better.

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
    4. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by afish40 · · Score: 1

      The first season of TNG was particularly terrible. The most infamous example being "The Naked Now", where the crew (with their standard Star Fleet issue miniskirts) became 'drunk' from an anomaly and Data had sex with Tasha Yar. And that, like many other early TNG episodes, was a rehashing of an Original Series episode, in this case, "The Naked Time". The stealing of plots from other Star Treks is not a new concept, it would seem. I must agree with everyone else, a Trek series doesn't get good until the 3rd season (unless it's TOS, which had been cancelled twice by that point ^_^). I've been sitting through Enterprise, tolerating T'Pol's blatant T&A, and the nigh-unbearable amount of time travel episodes (We don't have a plot for this week's episode! Send someone through time or something!), and I think it's finally starting to get interesting. Personally though, I'd like to see them attempt to further develop some of the bridge crew, lest they become bridge scenery like Chakotay did. Specifically, I want to see more Hoshi (who seems to be the most "human" character in the cast), and far less T'Pol (oh wow, she's showing emotion again! That's so weird to see a Vulcan showing emotion! *coughSpockcough*).

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    5. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in Enterprise the bad guys were supposed to be the Klingons again. But they just had to screw up the whole first contact plot and go with some idiotic temporal cold war in order to get their enemy!

      Incidentally, I wouldn't consider the Cardassians evil. Whenever they managed to get over their pride and prejudice, they seemed like a pretty intelligent and decent bunch.

    6. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think some of those first season TNG scripts were left over from the 1960s. (Sex planet!?)

      Likewise, I'm pretty sure a few eposides from the first season of Enterprise were actually just rewritten Voyager scripts.

    7. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      but the beauty of enterprise is that it is not as cut and dry as the other series. the Xindi are the enemy of humans but are not bad creatures, the writers make a point to show that they are just trying to protect themselves from a perceived threat, like Humans do so often.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by whats_a_zip · · Score: 1

      They've already began to fracture the enemy, an interesting twist. The Xinidi reptilians and perhaps the insectoids look as though they will remain evil, while the Federation will come to an agreement with the others. Meanwhile, the transdimensional beings seem to be the major evil for the next year. I like the twist.

    9. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Trying to out-evil Cardassians or the Borg is going to prove challenging.

      Just you wait. They are gonna introduce the Bushinians.

    10. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by moonbender · · Score: 1

      s/Xindi/Reptilians/ - or perhabs the sphere-builders.

      Don't misunderstand me, though, I love Enterprise season 3.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    11. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      I think some of those first season TNG scripts were left over from the 1960s

      Actually, the 70's. "The Child" and possibly one other episode were reworked from scripts written for "Star Trek: Phase Two" which was a planned Trek series to take place on Kirk's Enterprise, as the cornerstone of a Paramount TV network. Paramount ditched on the network and the pilot episode of Phase Two was reworked into Star Trek: The Motion Picture (yielding Phase Two characters like Decker and Ilia that had to be killed off).

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    12. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to established timeline, it seems to me that the Romulans would be there before Klingons.

      But this is Enterprise, B&B have already screwed the timeline up, and like others have said, the third season has been pretty good. I have to wonder though, what're they going to do with a 4th season?

    13. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Fool! It was "Great Joy, and Gratitude!" And it was, hands down, one of the worst moments in television. Ever. :)

    14. Re:Incredibly common with Star Trek by Snaller · · Score: 1

      The first season of TNG was particularly terrible.

      Which is the usual crap people just spew. There were several excellent episodes. "The Big Goodbye" won a Peabody award

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  35. However, in an attempt to "UPN it up..." by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the ship's comm officer will now be played by Mo'Nique, who will bring her distinctive brand of head-swiveling, big booty jokes, and "You go girl!" onboard to make the Enterprise the funkiest space trip ever! Also joining the cast will be Erik-Michael Estrada of the smash pop group O-Town. The jokes will be 'out of this world' as Erik-Michael asks the captain if they can put hydraulics on the ship or at least get a "La Raza" license plate frame. The new captain of the ship will be played by the whitest man alive - Al Gore. He can't dance and his slang is busted, but he can get them through all the interstellar police stops!

    Come join the cerebral fun on UPN!

    1. Re:However, in an attempt to "UPN it up..." by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      To boldizzly goizzle wherizzle no mizzle hizzle goizzle befizzle.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:However, in an attempt to "UPN it up..." by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, I can think of a scenario involving Seven of Nine arriving on the enterprise.

    3. Re:However, in an attempt to "UPN it up..." by Otter · · Score: 1

      I'd entirely suppressed this until now, but -- UPN already has done that show! Homeboys in Outer Space, with James Doohan in a minor role. It lasted slightly longer than that sit-com about slavery where the main character was Lincoln's wisecracking servant (can't remember the name of that one, or whether it was UPN or WB).

    4. Re:However, in an attempt to "UPN it up..." by Jbrecken · · Score: 1
      that sit-com about slavery where the main character was Lincoln's wisecracking servant (can't remember the name of that one, or whether it was UPN or WB).

      UPN - The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer
      It starred Chi McBride, who most recently was on Boston Common which also starred 7of9. (In an attempt to make this slightly less off-topic)
  36. Andromeda = cancelled? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "If Enterprise, Joan of Arcadia, and Andromeda all share the same time slot?"

    I thought Andromeda was cancelled. I never could get into it. I do not have a fondness for shows with sets that are so poorly lit that you have an irrational desire to shine a flashlight at the TV screen just to see what is going on.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  37. What choice did UPN have? by digitalamish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, what else have they got? Besides Enterprise, they've cancelled everything else that gave them ratings. At least this is a built in fan base. Oh, and as for the Friday timeslot, that's when Farscape was on, right? I'm sure UPN will replay it on Sundays before primetime.

  38. Re:Enterprise will be back by runlvl0 · · Score: 1

    Those who've been watching this season would disagree with you. I remember similar things being said about DS9 in season 3 as well.

    True enough. Wathcing DS9 (my favorite Trek) on Spike has reminded me how weak seasons 1-3 were; I'm just not sure that the continuity-impaired Braga will be able to pull it off for Enterprise. Best of luck to them, though.

    --

    Carthago delenda est!
  39. Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by Erik_ · · Score: 1

    Forget Andromeda, it also got canned at the end of the 4th season... the last two episode where a quick & dirty attempt to finish the story... :-(

    1. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      SciFi picked up Andromeda. They're running new episodes. Although God knows why. I watched a couple because TiVo said I should, and I always do what TiVo tells me to.

      They were terrible. I mean, beyond bad.

      Bad TiVo!

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 1

      Well, so many people like Andromeda (from many /. reads) so there has to be something to it... but psycologically, I just couldn't get past thinking of it as 'Hercules in Space'... just something about ol' Sorbo, I guess.

      I guess it's gonna be a little late to check on it now... :-P

    3. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      SciFi picked up Andromeda. They're running new episodes. Although God knows why. I watched a couple because TiVo said I should, and I always do what TiVo tells me to.

      They were terrible. I mean, beyond bad.

      Sci Fi did pick up the new season... but then the production house responsible for both Andromeda and Mutant X, "Fireworks," was put out of business by the parent company, CanWest. As a result, CanWest and Tribune (the company responsible for distributing Andromeda and Mutant X) are being sued... the future of both series looks rather bleak.

    4. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      the future of both series looks rather bleak.

      Which is a great comfort to the peace-loving peoples of the world.

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by yabos · · Score: 1

      That last episode was so screwed, I don't know what they were smoking when they thought it up.
      The show got lame near the end anyways, and didn't make a whole lot of sense.

    6. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by weslocke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it seems to have been saved (although they haven't released who did it or how yet)

      Taken from www.andromedatv.com (The official site)

      Kevin Sorbo Excited About
      Andromeda's Fifth Season

      Kevin Sorbo expressed his enthusiasm for the fifth season of Gene Roddenbery's Andromeda Wednesday, saying that he is looking forward to working once again with the program's tremendously talented cast, and fleshing out new adventures as Capt. Dylan Hunt.

      "I think the show is going in a great direction, and that the fans will find it interesting to see how Dylan handles the next round of challenges that come his way. It's great to be back with a cast that's so professional and fun to work with."

      Tribune Entertainment Vice President of Programming Bill Hamm says it will be a season that no sci-fi fan should miss.

      "It's going to be a thrilling and exciting new adventure -- one that I'm sure will keep fans of Dylan and the crew glued to the screen."

      Be sure to catch Season Five of Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda, every Friday on the Sci-Fi Channel at 8:00pm starting Sept. 24. Fans can also catch year five of the Andromeda's adventures in syndication beginning the week of Sept. 27 -- check local listings.


      and from the (soon to be closed) official forums

      Sorbonut broke the news first, but Ashley Edward Miller over at Ex Isle confirmed it: S5 starts production this month. And a bonus: he and Zack Stentz have sold a freelance script for S5 (possibly the fourth episode of the season). So if nothing else, we've got one goodie coming... :)

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    7. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by weslocke · · Score: 1

      Oh, forgot to mention... that Sorbo interview bit was posted May 12th, long after the whole Fireworks problem.

      --

      'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
    8. Re:Forget Andromeda... it's gone now by corsican · · Score: 1
      I'll tell you what they were smoking; the last of Gene Roddenberry's stash.

      --
      --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
  40. The real answer is simple... by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Renew Enterprise. Cancel Berman and Braga.

    1. Re:The real answer is simple... by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1

      I think you've hit on something here. I read this and realized that the only reason I wanted to see Enterpoop canceled, was so that B&B would be given the shaft. I _do_ like the show and I do watch it. This solves my personal quandry. Thanks!

    2. Re: The real answer is simple... by gidds · · Score: 1

      So what went wrong? I remember the TNG days, when a Braga writing credit had a very high correlation with a great story...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    3. Re: The real answer is simple... by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      I equate it with another sci-movie series. Braga fell underneath the dark spell of Darth Berman. Together they have ruled the Star Trek galaxy with an iron fist.

  41. Conservation of Television by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    over a hundred people lose their jobs as a result
    One show gets canned, another gets launched. Just as many people will get new jobs as people lose jobs if the show is canned - in many cases exactly the same people. By all means be disappointed if your favorite show comes to an end, but please don't be disappointed because of jobs lost.
    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Conservation of Television by jrj102 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt that's true: I would venture a guess that it takes at least twice as many people (and 5 times as much money, which goes into the economy through special effects shops, etc.) to make an episode of Enterprise than it does to make an episode of "Who Wants to Marry a One-legged Garbage man with a Flattulance problem?"

      It's not quite a zero-sum game. :)

    2. Re:Conservation of Television by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      But they're more likely to replace it with "space warping teenaged archangel clairvoyant cop from the next millennium" than "Who wants to marry...".

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    3. Re:Conservation of Television by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Why? The farting garbageman is cheaper, easier to find, and apparently gets higher ratings. The networks would dump sci-fi in a minute if they thought flatulent garbagemen were more profitable.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  42. Re:Enterprise will be back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. I didn't really get into DS9 until around season 3, which is roughly the time when the conflict with the Dominion got interesting.

    And so far, this season of Enterprise has been pretty good... can't really complain.

  43. Sci-fi fans in general... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can never be happy. Stay with me on this one before you hit that mod button :). Basically either you have shows people liked that get cancelled in their prime, thus to be lauded forever as the best show ever if only it had been able to reach its potential...

    OR

    You have them where they go on too long and thus should have been cancelled long ago. Thus you have purists that only recognize seasons 2,3,5, but not 4 where they went to that alternate dimension, what were they thinking!.

    I guess this can be said for most shows, but it seems to apply more to scifi for some reasons. I think really only Babylon 5 went out on the perfect note, mainly because thats when it was supposed to happen.

    1. Re:Sci-fi fans in general... by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      I guess this can be said for most shows, but it seems to apply more to scifi for some reasons. I think really only Babylon 5 went out on the perfect note, mainly because thats when it was supposed to happen.

      There was a slight problem with the B5 - as they thought they were getting cancelled at the end of season 4 they compressed what should have been season 5 into season 4 - so you can still say that B5 didn't quite reach it's full potential (ie a longer Shadow War and a longer Civil War).

      Tk

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    2. Re:Sci-fi fans in general... by xconslash · · Score: 1

      ST:TNG was good pretty much all the way through. Granted there are some people, myself included, prefere the later episodes, but I doubt there's many who'd pretend that Season's 1 and 2 did not exist.

      --


      .sig error: carrier signal lost.
    3. Re:Sci-fi fans in general... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have two things to say to that one.

      First, there are shows which seem to avoid the problem. DS9, for example, was great. It started out ok, got better as it went along, and ended right. It wasn't too early, but it didn't drag on. Farscape was pretty much the same, from what I gather (I stopped watching it regularly around the end of season 2).

      Second, since I stopped watching TV, I'm a much happier SF fan. Bad books and movies are much easier to ignore, and much easier to find. Good movies are hard to find, but you can substitute good books until the next Minority Report, or whatever floats your boat, comes along. Neither one has to be, for lack of a better word, subscribed to the way TV shows have to be, so it's a much better experience overall. DS9 and Farscape were good, but the pain of the medium just isn't worth the chance of finding something equally good in the future for me.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    4. Re:Sci-fi fans in general... by sckeener · · Score: 1

      can't resist....must comment....argh

      I think really only Babylon 5 went out on the perfect note, mainly because thats when it was supposed to happen.

      They never should have renewed the last season! Then it would have ended the way it was supposed to end! What were they thinking!

      (don't get me wrong...I wanted more episodes, but it lost focus and is still losing focus in the SciFi channel spin offs)

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    5. Re:Sci-fi fans in general... by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Here's the unfortunate part, B5 climaxed too early because they told JMS he wasn't going to get his full 5 seasons, which is why everything ends halfway into season 4, and then the latter half of season 4 and most of season 5 are just filler. Even so it's still a great series, because JMS had a plan for the entire 5 season arc.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  44. Old technology does not compute.. by tommck · · Score: 1


    What's a VCR?

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    1. Re:Old technology does not compute.. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It's an ancient device used to record moving pictures. Those devices used a sort of tape with little magnets on it to record those moving pictures. Altough it could play and record, it was low quality and the tape needed to be rewinded after watching a movie. Ofcouse no one still uses these ancient devices and you're unlike to ever see one of these outside a museum or your grandparents home.
      Today we use DVD to see and record our programs and movies. Could you believe there was a time when you didn't got houres of useless extras when buying a movie?

    2. Re:Old technology does not compute.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a VCR?

      "[A] VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone."

      - Jack Valenti

  45. I, for one by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Thousands of Enterprise fans will, after celebrating, move back into their parents' basements to plot their next letter campaign"

    I for one, look forward to seeing the amount of trekspam increase in proportion to viagra pitches. I also look forward to the words evolving to evade filters: "SAV TRECK SP0CK RULES and "WRITE LE.TTERS TO PARAMOONT - CAST NIMOY AS CAP.T IN NEW SHOW

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  46. Re:Lucas and UPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually JarJar doesn't come through from a "parallel universe" (your term). He's sucked through a black hole in a stolen Empire prototype ship and shot forward through time to Enterprise's timeline. The story will actually make some sense once you see it. (My uncle happens to work on Enterprise)

  47. Am I just getting old? by -tji · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or do others here find 'Enterprise' uninteresting? The plots always seem corny, and it just ends up seeming silly rather than thought provoking (which is what good sci-fi should be).

    I tried watching again when they started the HDTV broadcasts.. It looked good visually, but the content was still uninspiring.

    1. Re:Am I just getting old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not the only one. My friends and I regularly get together and make fun of the episode of Enterprise while watching it. Sometimes with alcohol, too.

      It's hard to really care about the series when the only character in the whole cast that we really find likable is Dr. Phlox. We used to like T'Pol as a character, until they decided that a Vulcan should have emotions. Now we just like T'Pol. =D

  48. Re:Enterprise will be back by doormat · · Score: 1

    Yea, I agree, this season has actually compelled me to watch. I watched the first few episodes of the series, and lost interest eventually. But this season has brought me back. This arc with the Xindi is really interesting. Maybe a little long... but still interesting none the less..

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  49. Damn by RoderickMcDougall · · Score: 5, Funny

    There goes my hopes for the return of Quantum Leap :)

    1. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be patient. Maybe Scott Bacula will take over your body some day.

      Wait. Is that a good thing?

    2. Re:Damn by irving47 · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. Remember what happened when Quantum Leap got moved to Friday nights?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    3. Re:Damn by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Ironic. Quantum Leap would be the better show to continue, rather than Enterprise.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  50. Let it die already by starfarer42 · · Score: 1

    My friends know I used to be a real die-hard trekker. I stuck with Enterprise through its first two seasons, but this last one finally drove me away. Now I only watch it if I can't find a rerun of the Simpsons -- and with 150 channels on my digital cable it's rare that Simpsons isn't on somewhere.

  51. When does it come on now? I've got Tivo! by jarich · · Score: 1

    I don't know when most of my favorite shows come on now. I Tivo them... Enterprise isn't my favorite show and I wouldn't go out of my way to watch it but it's decent filler, if I can watch it when I have time.

  52. Re:Lucas and UPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's Jar Jar. There was a leaked storyboard which was verified as legit. He's in a stolen ship and goes through time or something goofy.

  53. You are so right about Jar Jar by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "...He's sucked..."

    Ever since his first appearance in "Episode I".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  54. NOOOOO! by inmodulo · · Score: 2, Funny
    Now I will have to wait till saturday morning to get Enterprise on bittorent. Oh the humanity

    P.S. I think series three is superb ( if a little slow at times) but I still have withdrawel symptoms from lack of my FireFly Fix.

  55. original Star Trek killed by moving to Fridays by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The original Star Trek series ratings fell when it was moved from Thursday night to Friday night the second year. It lost much of the teenage male crowd.

  56. Re:Angel final episode Wednesday night at 9PM by MrBlue+VT · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Stupid reality crap is destroying TV. They wonder why ratings for male 18-24 year olds has gone way down? It's partly because of all the crappy reality shows. I don't know any guys in this age range who watch those reality shows. Make some decent scripted shows and maybe we'll start watching more.

  57. Enterprise lives up to the standards of TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first two seasons of TNG weren't that great. In fact, much like Enterprise, they were full of rehashings of old Star Trek episodes. Also like Enterprise, it took until the 3rd season for the characters to really become more than one-dimensional, and to settle into their roles. Also like Enterprise, there were inconsistencies with TOS riddled throughout the first seasons.

  58. hey, good timing! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since both Andromeda & Mutant X have been cancelled, Enterprise can hire those excellent writers to improve the show. Perfect. (I kid! :)

    Oh, plus Enterprise should hire more babes - the babes of those two shows (especially Lexa Doig, the hacker 'Cowgirl' herself!) would certainly improve ratings.

    When the 'new Trek' concept was being worked on, it was apparently down to two concepts - the 'pre-Federation' concept (which we got), and a more military-themed one about a Starfleet strike force of some type, with lots of fighting. Let me tell ya - Enterprise got a lot better right after they added more fighting (and a military team aboard Enterprise, which they've totally wasted so far). It seems obvious that they chose the wrong concept.

    Though I do like what they've been doing with T'Pol, but they've basically eliminated Hoshi and others this season, which is too bad. I certainly like this collection of characters more than those of any of the other Treks, as a whole. DS9 had a _really_ annoying cast of characters. (Okay, I loved Ezri just too damned much!)

    1. Re:hey, good timing! by Erwos · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      This whole "explore the universe" bit has been done and done again. Star Trek, ST:TNG, Voyager, Enterprise - I think we've seen enough of the damn universe.

      A good sci-fi military drama (what was the last real one - Space and Beyond?) set in the Star Trek universe (around the time of ST:TNG) could be absolutely amazing, and it would explore a mostly-unseen part of the Federation.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    2. Re:hey, good timing! by rehabdoll · · Score: 1

      Please, Quark & Rom were _GODS_

    3. Re:hey, good timing! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Well, not Rom, but I agree that Quark was pretty cool.

    4. Re:hey, good timing! by Viceice · · Score: 1

      I agree. I absolutely loved the scene where they first repelled an Xindi boarding party, and they beat the crap out of the borders.

      Finally, somebody in Starfleet can actualy fire phasers and not miss 99% of the time.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    5. Re:hey, good timing! by aligas · · Score: 1

      Well, timeline wise Enterprise comes before all the other Star Treks, right?

      So that means that sometime between Enterprise and Star Trek we forgot to teach the new folks how to aim :).

    6. Re:hey, good timing! by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      Quark was soo cool I keep on refering to him as Quark, even though I'm watching Buffy, (he's the principel in seasons 1,2 and 3) and Stargate SG-1 (one of the Knox in season 1). ;-)

  59. Zzzz.... by Giant+Panda · · Score: 1

    I've given up on the Trek series. To me, several versions back it stopped being good science fiction and started being 100% fantasy / soap opera. And, it's getting more and more like they just take the scripts from last season, change the name of the planet / evil nemesis, weave in some ridiculous love interest, viola!

  60. Should Have Been Canceled by AngryWookiee · · Score: 0

    I was hopping they would cancel this show and put us trek fans out of our misery. This has to be easily the worst Star Trek series ever. DS9 was ok, Voyager was bad, but Enterprise is just awful. I really like how the idiot producers have destroied Star Trek and how the show has become so boring, with the same stupid stories that have been told for the last ten years being used over and over.

    In my opinon this show should have died a long time ago, and Star Trek should have been put to rest for a while, so that maybe in a few years it could have been revived with some fresh writers and some enthusiasm for a new series.

    Sadly we're stuck with this crap that's nothing but a bunch of shows with no plot and boring characters, and don't even get me started on how this show has destroyed trek continuity with the orginal series.

    1. Re:Should Have Been Canceled by kmcneely · · Score: 1

      The continuity isn't SUPPOSED to be the same. They've said on a number of occasions that this trek takes place in the slightly altered timeline created by First Contact.

    2. Re:Should Have Been Canceled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firefly is dead get over it

  61. Re:Lucas and UPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you see how it unfolds?

    Jar-Jar is in a ship they stole from one of the Emperor's labs (or something) and flies too close to a black hole. Gets taken into the hole and is spat through time to Enterprise.

    No explanation on how he gets back as the ship is destroyed when he goes through time the first time.

  62. Re:Enterprise will be back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember similar things being said about DS9 in season 3 as well.

    Yeah, and I remember people saying "Voyager is really picking up steam now!" every year. Except that in retorspect it's 7 identical years of unwatchable drek.

    Come to think of it, most DS9 episodes also blew until they got into the last 2 seasons. (Boring military officers sitting around a bar jawjacking is not good science fiction.)

  63. No change for me by CosmicDreams · · Score: 1

    I've always had to watch Enterprise on Fridays with my local station. This show is inspiring. I am happy to see it on the air for another season. Now the writers and producers will have to match this season's story arc, that isn't as easy as you might think.

    --
    Go Gusties
  64. Re:Let Trek Die With What Dignity It Still HAs Lef by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you disagree with me state your arguments. Moderating me down as a troll because you don't agree with me is immature at best.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  65. Re:Script Extract from Season Four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Oh, sweet *shit*... I'm *so* going to hell for laughing at that.

  66. Swell by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More opportunity for Rick Berman to urinate on Roddenberry's vision.

    I know it's cool to knock Enterprise, but I've been knocking Berman since long before it was cool. :-) The man just doesn't understand what Roddenberry created, and now he's trying to compete head on with other Sci Fi or with the memory of Babylon 5. Is it any wonder Star Trek has been in a downward spiral for the past 10 years?

    Enterprise's ratings weren't good enough "just exploring" (and as they were doing a poor job of it I'm not surprised), so instead they spent a third of season 2 building up a relationship with the Klingons only to drop it at the last second to run off on a blatant 9/11-inspired warmed over mini-epic. (And stolen from a 1980s Star Trek computer game for the Commodore 64 called "Star Trek: Rebel Universe".) Everything about it is predictable, from the plot right down to the characters involved. And of course there's no tension, because we all know (since it's a prequel) that Earth isn't going to be destroyed.

    Of course, Berman isn't pitching to people who know Star Trek, he's pitching to 20-somethings that the beancounters like to pitch to. Of course, those people don't watch Star Trek BECAUSE it's Star Trek. Don't alienate your existing fan base to go after a new one that doesn't want you.

    Of course, after this season's finale, then what? Go back to exploring? Yeah, that will help ratings now that they've said that exploring "isn't big enough". Throw in another huge season-long pseudo-epic plot thread to further destroy the timeline? I don't know what they're going to do.

    On the one hand, it's Trek, yay, there will be more. On the other, this isn't the Trek I grew up on (TNG and reruns of TOS), and I wouldn't greatly miss it.

    Although moving the show to Friday night means that it won't be lasting much longer. That is how NBC killed the original series, after all.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:Swell by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I know it's cool to knock Enterprise, but I've been knocking Berman since long before it was cool. :-) The man just doesn't understand what Roddenberry created

      Alright, Roddenberry has always been way overrated. TOS was just a mess in terms of background and continuity, and TNG started out a mess, and got progressively better the less he had control over it. The strength of Star Trek was in the writers he managed to get, not in any creative control or direction he provided.

    2. Re:Swell by cdipierr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Roddenberry's vision was a novel, neat idea in the 1960's that worked pretty well.

      It worked again in the 1980's with TNG's first few seasons because it had been 20 years since the last time.

      However, by the end of TNG and certainly the beginning of DS9, and now with Voyager & Enterprise, Roddenberry's vision is boring. There's only so many times you can rehash the same old morality plays.

      Berman suffers from a similar problem. When he and Braga first started writing DS9, they wrote the Dominion storylines to compete with B5, and frankly that's when DS9 became good. The reason it was good was not just because of continuity, but because the characters started to have non-Starfleet and non-Startrek personalities. Sisko was perhaps the best written and acted Starfleet captain of all time, but he doesn't fit in with the utopian view that Roddenberry had.

      Now with Voyager and Enterprise, Berman is throwing continuity on to the screen for continuity's sake. And frankly it sucks. I feel as if this year's Enterprise should have had a shot of Berman in the corner saying "SEE I CAN GIVE YOU CONTINUITY!!!!". The only redeeming parts of this season have been when Archer (and others) have turned darker, and hence less like Roddenberry wanted.

      What needs to happen is for Star Trek to get some new blood from people who appreciate not just Star Trek for the sake of Trek or continuity for the sake of continuity, but who can actually tell good stories whether they fit in with utopia or not.

    3. Re:Swell by mabu · · Score: 1

      I really don't think Roddenberry would have minded as much as people claim relating to the new shows. There were so many continuity issues with TOS, they're not even worth counting.

      Just the other night I was watching the TOS episode where Kahn shows up. I laughed aloud when they bring this stranger to the ship, and give him full access to the engineering schematics of the ship. It seems in every episode of TOS, they invite weird people on the ship and let them wander wherever they like. It's hard to take things seriously, when for example, they find "silicon nodules" deep in a mine and dance around the premise that they might be "eggs" until the very last minute. The dumbing down of the plot on TOS was as entertaining as running fingernails across a chalk board.

      I think the main conflict is between those who locked in on the more cohesive universe created by TNG and are getting upset that the spin-offs are more-and-more pandering to some of the shallow ideals TOS originally played on.

      Then again, I suspect even Roddenberry would have barfed upon hearing the theme song for Enterprise.

    4. Re:Swell by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      However, by the end of TNG and certainly the beginning of DS9, and now with Voyager & Enterprise, Roddenberry's vision is boring. There's only so many times you can rehash the same old morality plays.

      Very well said, you hit the nail on the head.

      I think when people are talking about "Gene's Vision", they are really just expressing "I want new Trek to be as good as I remember old Trek. Berman sucks". Well, Berman tried -- he made the same Roddenbury Godlike Alien/Holodeck/Prime Directive episodes 1000 times, and people hate it because it's just been beaten to death.

      It's like Ebert said about the last movie -- "Warp Nine! Sheilds down to 10%!" doesn't have any drama left in it. Why do it?

      What needs to happen is for Star Trek to get some new blood ... who can actually tell good stories whether they fit in with utopia or not.

      It comes down to whether it's a problem with execution or concept. Sure the execution could be a lot better (dull boyscout characters, bad acting, stupid plots), but I really wonder if the idea of "Explore the universe in a spaceship" is just totally played-out and done.

      They almost have to throw in time-travel plots and so on because the old formula is dead, and there's no new formula to replace it. (And if there is, it's going to be nothing like Star Trek -- like the "alien prophet" stuff on DS9.)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    5. Re:Swell by ari_j · · Score: 1

      No tension? In case you haven't noticed, Enterprise (as much as I enjoy watching it) pays about as much attention to continuity with other Trek series as it does to Roddenberry's vision. I wouldn't be surprised if they did blow up Earth, after all. :)

    6. Re:Swell by cdipierr · · Score: 1

      You're right, exploring the universe in a ship is probably done (at least for the next 20 years anyway), but that doesn't mean the concept of Star Trek or more generally, a sci-fi series set in space has to be boring or unoriginal.

      I'm going to sound like a real geek here, but bear with me.

      For nearly five years, a bunch of us played a Star Trek RPG two to three times a month (actually two separate games, but that's besides the point). Though I started out as a player, I eventually ended up doing a lot of the GM work since our "real" GM ended up busy.

      We liked to treat our RPG sessions as TV "episodes" in that they took two or three sessions and had a start, a middle and an end, each one being somewhat self contained. As such, I had the opportunity to write what amounted to a great deal of interactive fiction.

      The "episodes" I wrote that had supernatural twists or god forbid time travel went well, but now a few years later are not the ones that stick out in my mind as being "wow, that was fun". The ones that do stick in my mind are those that were driven by character-driven drama. For instance, let's really explore Character X and shove her in situation Y and then spend a few sessions playing how she'd react to that situation.

      Now, to get back on topic...I really think the same thing could be done with Star Trek. The big problem in my mind is that 90% of Star Trek's conflict comes between "the ship's crew" and "some external problem". If instead, 50-75% of the episodes and plot were based on character interaction and conflict, you'd end up with a decent show.

      This might sound boring, but it'd been done well before. JMS's B5 world had large overwhelming events (Shadow War, Independence, etc.), but when you boil down most of the individual episodes (though not all), they revolved around character interaction (Sheridan with Delenn, Garibaldi with Franklin, etc).

      Anyway, long geeky rant, but that summarizes my problems with Trek as it currently is.

    7. Re:Swell by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      Assuming they can invent some decent characters.

      They've done a ton of characterization episodes, and in my book they're worse than the space opera stuff. -- Troi's Mother, Holo-Doctor learns to play the piano, 80% of DS9 spent sitting around the space tavern -- Yawn.

      (The only reason anyone liked the Voyager Doctor is because everyone else was a stick figure. And the Enterprise charactes are the same way -- they're boring, you don't care that they like to play checkers. This is the 'Roddenbury' thing -- everyone has to be a Gee Whiz Boyscout.)

      If there's one kernel of corn in Enterprise, it's the Vulcan Psychology stuff. Not always really well executed, but they're taking the Vulcan angle somewhere new.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    8. Re:Swell by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If they stick with the mythos of 100 years Before Kirk- they've still got the Romulan War to look forward to- as well as a major conflict with the Klingons.

      The Romulan War should be interesting, as the only compatible tech is subspace *audio*- don't count on ever seeing a Romulan in any battle.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Swell by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      However, by the end of TNG and certainly the beginning of DS9, and now with Voyager & Enterprise, Roddenberry's vision is boring.

      Its not boring, its not there at all.
      Gene died in 1991, and Rick Berman started raping star trek before the body was cold.
      Berman never liked Star Trek, he liked the money-making petential of a well known brand name, but he did not like:Gene's vision, so he killed it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:Swell by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Actually I wouldn't count on *NOT* seeing a Romulan given how much thought they give to continuity and how difficult it might prove to write entertaining episodes where you cannot see the ennemy at all.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  67. Wait!! by Lugor · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't Entreprise a reality show?

  68. Try merge the storyline with the TOS timeline. by wongqc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What I would love to see next season, is more on the Klingons, the Romulans....the Vulcans. How the war between the humans and the Klingons came about....The formation of the federation, Invention of tractor beams, shields....

    In short, try to channel the story to the TOS timeline.

    1. Re:Try merge the storyline with the TOS timeline. by xTown · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of people would like to see that, but given that Berman doesn't give a damn about anything having to do with Star Trek's history, we're not likely to see it unless they can work in 30th Centurry timeship garbage.

    2. Re:Try merge the storyline with the TOS timeline. by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      Too late, they've already raped the ST timeline.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    3. Re:Try merge the storyline with the TOS timeline. by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Well, since the first contact with the Romulans happens during TOS, this is hard to imagine. Actually, before their first contact with the Federation, Romulans were not a warp-capable race. It would be cool if they could incorporate some of Diane Duane's storyline, about the Federation first discovering Romulans, and the battles which ensued.

      Two problems with this, though: This happens much later in the timeline and I don't think Berman would use such a good source as Diane Duane. Shame really.

  69. Who cares... by michrech · · Score: 1

    ...what day it's on. I'll watch it regardless. If I can't be there to watch it, I'll set my PVR500 to record it so I can watch it later.

    I thought the series started off a bit slow at first, but with the last few episodes, even though I know Earth will be saved and the evil dooers trying to reconfigure space will be defeated, I still find it interesting.

    I think they should put FireFly back on the air either right before or right after Enterprise. That would be cool.. =]

    --
    bork bork bork!
  70. Friday Might be good by Stubtify · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know everyone thinks friday night tv is some black hole that shows go to when they're ready to die, but this could be good. As it stands right now Enterprise is battling Smallville on Wednesday nights along with American Idol. At least friday's are faily wide open, so this might actually raise the total number of viewiers.

    1. Re:Friday Might be good by mriker · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I'm thinking. American Idol is one of the most popular shows on TV (if not THE most popular), so not putting Enterprise head-to-head with it would probably be a pretty smart move. Even if Trekkers aren't likely to watch American Idol instead of Enterprise, more casual [potential] viewers might not even know it's on because they're too busy watching American Idol (or their kids are, etc.).

  71. Not just Firefly fans by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those of us who were around for Star Trek: The Original Series remember that, after NBC was forced to renew ST:TOS thanks to the massive letter-writing campaign, they moved the show from its original 8:30 time slot (Thursdays the first season, Fridays the second) to Fridays at 10 PM, thereby ensuring that the show would never make it to a fourth season because that time slot was a ratings graveyard.

    Today with VCRs and TiVos abounding fans of the show will probably be able to catch it no matter when it airs, but still, couldn't they have found a better time slot? Seems to me it's sort of like being in a half-empty movie theater and choosing to sit in the worst seat possible.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
    1. Re:Not just Firefly fans by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I wish they would offer a paid Sci-fi tv channel for new running sci-fi shows like FireFly, Star Trek, and all the others that the sci-fi shows before they get canceled. (B5, FarScape, etc)

      I'd pay 20 bux a month for a subscription to continue the shows. If they can have a golf-channel, they can have a true Sci-Fi series channel. Look how popular TechTV is (even though G4 ate them)...

    2. Re:Not just Firefly fans by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      Yeah that would be nice but I strongly suspect they are barely getting by as it is with Sci-Fi.

      Personally I wish Sci-Fi would just get behind some better original programming. Surely someone could come up with something at least as good as Red Dwarf, which strikes me as being produced with the typical BBC budget of 25 quid an episode but gets by with good character interaction and clever writing, instead of drek like Scare Tactics and Mad Mad House.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    3. Re:Not just Firefly fans by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly the problem.

      The TV industry is just as bad as the music industry, pushing top 40 crap, endless supply of boy band's, when there is a good population wanting Indy (sci-fi) type entertainment.

      This is why Internet broadcasting is so important, people can choose, and smaller studios can make a profit. Unless the distribution models are broken, we are in for the common dominator of entertainment. Fast food entertainment, all the same.

  72. prime in season three, and this is no exception. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have anything to do with T'Pol removing more clothing in more episodes than any other season? I guess Hoshi didn't do it for you, in the second season?

    Maybe the fourth season with have T'Pol AND Hoshi - together!

  73. My solution to Fridays... by CokoBWare · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have one word that can save the Friday timeslot...

    PVR

    Actually, that's three words... but seriously, it's the only way I get to watch Enterprise as it is...

    1. Re:My solution to Fridays... by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      This entire season, since I switched to DirecTV, the only way for me to watch Enterprise (or any show that airs on the big national networks) is by downloading pirated copies from the Internet. DirecTV has been promising local channels for months but nothing seems to be happening. (I'm in Maine if you're curious.)

  74. Not a big problem by sleeperservice · · Score: 2, Informative

    The only snag? It looks like 'Enterprise' might be moved to Fridays next year, and Firefly fans can tell you what a great place that is..."

    Doesn't every self-respecting 'Enterprise' fan just TIVO it anyway?

    1. Re:Not a big problem by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Only if their parents can afford the TiVo.

  75. I'm allergic to Cheetos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod!

  76. Why do stations try to cancel good shows? by stealth.c · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Enterprise never appealed that much to me, but apparently there are some very intense fans and there must be a good reason for that.

    Firefly didn't float my boat either, but I seem to recall it getting good reviews.

    Farscape was constantly gaining new fans for its four year run. And I paid really close attention to the events surrounding Farscape. It was the show that pulled SCIFI out of relative obscurity among cable stations, their most popular show, yet they tried like hell to get it canceled. They jerked its time slot around when they stopped liking it, surrounded it with lackluster programming (Invisible Man being an exception), and as far as advertising goes, did their best to pretend it didn't exist.

    Looks like the same thing is happening with Enterprise. The devoted fans (basically a captive audience for advertisers, read: A GOOD THING) saved the show it appears, and yet the network is screwing up its time slot to drive its popularity down. If you don't want to air the show, just fsckin' say so and send it to another network.

    Is there a petition out there to bring back the NextGen crew for another few movies? ST:TNG was some of the best Trek ever.

  77. renewal by WP+Mayhew · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I for one am glad that Enterprise will be renewed. I've never owned any ST merchandise much less been to a convention, but I have watched all the Star Trek series and I liked having them around.

    I agree that Enterprise is not perfect, but show me a Star Trek series that was?

    TOS had more than a few god-awful episodes (e.g. And the Children shall lead, Miri, Charlie X (title?).

    TNG started out very shakily IMHO as the actors/writers settled into the characters (e.g. Picard wasn't quite yet his reserved and commanding self, and Worf just snarled at everything); and for the length of the series you had many fans screaming about any episode which Troi or Wesley starred in.

    DS9 was pretty good, though I think the situation is somewhat comparable with Enterprise in that the show, IMHO, has a stronger and more interesting supporting cast than the 'starring' captain.

    Voyager had a lot of well-known problems.

    Perfect shows are rare - enjoy your favorite parts of this one and hope the other parts get better.

    1. Re:renewal by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd say 70% of ALL trek episodes were boring and unprogressive (ie. starred Wesley or Troi). But that didn't matter so long as episodes like "I, Borg", "Chain of Command", "The Search", and of course "The Best of Both World's"

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  78. Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

    "I think really only Babylon 5 went out on the perfect note, mainly because thats when it was supposed to happen."

    Babylon 5 remains my hands-down favorite sci fi series of all time. Damn well done, wish we had more like it.

    Now I'll no doubt be speedily corrected if wrong ;-) but actually wasn't the push to retake Earth completely rushed due to Babylon 5 nearly being cancelled a year early?

    My impression was that Sheridan's capture, interrogation/Psycorps torture, and Ivanova's leading the rebel forces to rescue Sheridan, defeat of Earth conspiracy was all meant play out over the better part of a season. Instead it all got wrapped up in warp gate time.

    Then the damn network turned around and renewed the show, the whole "cancellation" seeming nothing more than a !$&%! bargaining ploy.

    Which sucks, since I was rabidly awaiting that juicy thread of the plot arc to play out along Straczynski's usual beautifully orchestrated storytelling. Man, given the proper time to unfold, that plotline would have kicked serious ass!

    1. Re:Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

      Man, given the proper time to unfold, that plotline would have kicked serious ass!

      I'd love to know what the original arc was suppossed to have been with Sinclair in charge - they transposed some things, such as Sinclair getting involved with Delenn becoming Sheridan getting involved, but what about things like Babylon 4 and all the foretelling of the destruction of Babylon 5?

      --
      At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
    2. Re:Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by MooseByte · · Score: 1

      "I'd love to know what the original arc was suppossed to have been with Sinclair in charge"

      I'm with ya! And frankly I've always felt cheated by the lack of the promised shower scene between Ivanova and Talia. C'mon Straczynski, couldn't you have "jumped the shark" just that one time for us? :-)

    3. Re:Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      According to JMS, on CompuServer way back when, the fourth season was supposed to end with Sheridan's capture and torture.

      The telepaths were supposed to be introduced in the 4th season and running in the background (Ivanova was supposed to get involved with the telepaths, not the redhead) through the 4th and 5th season.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    4. Re:Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by JDAustin · · Score: 1

      I remember reading something from JMS about how the threatened cancelation affected the schedule. He basically had 4 less episodes to work with as fare as the civil war went. Instead of 'The Deconstruction of Falling Stars' (a look back at Sheridans actions from various points in the future) being the final episode of season 4, the episode of Sheridans interrigation (Intersections in Real Time) was to be the season finale. Also remember that the series finale, Sleeping in Light, was shot then also.

      Yes, the threatened cancelation impacted the series, but not to a great length. Just enough though to make the civil war conclusion feel rushed.

    5. Re:Babylon 5 pseudo-cancelled at one point? by dinaui · · Score: 1

      Now I'll no doubt be speedily corrected if wrong ;-) but actually wasn't the push to retake Earth completely rushed due to Babylon 5 nearly being cancelled a year early?

      It wasn't completely rushed: as noted elsewhere in this thread, had JMS (J. Michael Stracynski, the author) been planning on a fifth season, the fourth season would have ended with "Intersections in Real Time", which was the 5th-last episode of the season. (See the Lurker's Guide.) The fourth season actually stands up pretty well.

      The more important effect was that the fifth season was probably the weakest of the series, with many threads intended to end in season 5 wrapped up in season 4 and many threads intended to start in season 4 being jettisoned and then having to be restarted in season 5 without much lead time.

      Then the damn network turned around and renewed the show, the whole "cancellation" seeming nothing more than a !$&%! bargaining ploy.

      The "damn network" didn't turn around and renew the show. Seasons 1 thru 4 were aired by the Prime Time Entertainment Network (PTEN), which collapsed. After some legal acrobatics, the cable network TNT bought up the rights to distribute Babylon 5 from this defunct entity, which is why B5 went from late night UHF broadcasts to cable.

  79. End of this Season... by caldroun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to say that towards the end of this season it has kept my interest. I was starting to tire of the whole story arc with the xindi, but the story has picked up steam. I am glad it is staying.

    I liked that in some aspects that Archer was willing to set his P.C. outlook on some things to get stuff done.

    BTW:I don't care what night it is on, that is why I have Tivo.

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  80. The question you should be asking is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of self-respecting nerd uses BOSE speakers?

    1. Re:The question you should be asking is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here! Here!

      Bose is about the most overrated overpriced crap there is in speakers.

  81. It has to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Enterprise is getting better. "

    When you're at the bottom, you can only go up.

    1. Re:It has to... by idontgno · · Score: 1
      "No you're not, you'll be stone dead in moment."

      It had to be said.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  82. Friday nights ruined 3rd watch by British · · Score: 1

    WTF is up with Friday?

    It used to be I could watch Crossing Jordan and 3rd Watch on Monday nights, trying to relax after work.

    Then they put 3rd Watch to Fridays, and now I've completely lost on the storyline. I don't want to watch Fear Factor or the 2000th installment of Dateline NBC.

    Ah yes, Fridays is the waiting room for the graveyard of television shows.

    1. Re:Friday nights ruined 3rd watch by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Why does it bother you about Friday? I have managed to hang onto Third Watch just fine. Crossing Jordan being gone for six months was annoying as all hell but other than that the two shows appeared in my TiVo listing just fine.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  83. Re:Lucas and UPN by MBraynard · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded troll???

  84. Good by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like the show, although I am annoyed that they've already resorted to time travel. I thought they'd already figured out that that's when the other shows started going down hill.

    I'd also like them to take a more X-Files approach, where you mix the continuing storyline with single standalone episodes. I think they've concentrated too much on the Xindi (?). If you don't like that storyline, the whole season's been a wash, and while I like the storyline, it's just been going on too long.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  85. ABOUT TIME by Arnok · · Score: 0

    Thank the powers that be that it is being renewed

  86. A 3rd series? Ziggy why haven't I jumped yet? by aurelian · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    This show is so tedious I was amazed people watch it - but then I saw the real reason: the vulcan woman's chest. Like the borg woman in voyager.

    basically these days star trek == nerds looking at tits.

  87. It has one fatal flaw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually a few, but the most critical is the actor who plays the captain. Just wicked awful. I mean, poke your eyes out with a pencil awful.

    Kill the guy of (in the show, not in real life) and just get a better actor in place. Until that happens, the show will be a lot of potential, nothing more.

    1. Re:It has one fatal flaw by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

      Scott Bakula ("Quantum Leap")

      I always wanted an evil alien to appear or something and here him say "Oh...boy"

    2. Re:It has one fatal flaw by armentage · · Score: 1
      You know, you're right! Bakula's Captain Archer is way too dry and takes himself way too seriously. Everyone was so excited when we heard it'd be Bakula in the staring role, mostly because we had loved him so much on Quantum Leap.

      They really need to open him up, put some personality back into the character. We don't watch Bakula for his great acting, we watch him for who he comes across as when he's being himself (or at least, being Sam on Quantum Leep.)

  88. This is very true by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think this last season of Enterprise has been great. Season 2 was in many ways better than Season two of TNG. I mean, think back to the ridiculous conspiracy Season Finale of Season 2 in TNG and compare it to last year's entering of the "expanse" in Enterprise.

    Enterprise is also dealing with many ethical issues that were previously not tackled by any major series because it seriously conflicts with popular morals.

    We are talking about growing humans for the purpose of harvesting of organs, eugenics, utilization of psychological manipulation to extract information, and many other examples.

    It is such a refreshing alternative to the feel good BS of TNG where there was almost NEVER any moral ambiguity and the good guys always win.

    With Enterprise, especially in the past year, we don't know always who the good guys are... we are presented with people working to save their planet, all other moral concerns are ultimately secondary to that goal.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:This is very true by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      exactly, this series, the enemy of humans are themselves easy to sympathize with. they show that there is not just good and evil, but that there is a story to every side.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:This is very true by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Enterprise is also dealing with many ethical issues that were previously not tackled by any major series because it seriously conflicts with popular morals.

      Like what? Archer stealing the warp coil from the friendly aliens to continue his mission? Sorry, Sisko already did that (and Brooks did it much better then Bakula) in "In the Pale Moonlight", when he (and Garek) murdered a Romulan Senator in cold blood to get the Romulans into the war against the Dominion. I'll grant you that TNG never went there but such a dark episode really wouldn't have fit into TNG's happier times.

      It is such a refreshing alternative to the feel good BS of TNG where there was almost NEVER any moral ambiguity and the good guys always win.

      Feel good BS where the good guys always win? Sorry but I'm going to call bullshit on that. First of all in TNG the good guys did not always win. Witness "Data's Day" where Picard was forced to allow a Romulan spy to escape. Or how about "Skin of Evil" where Tasha Yar is murdered in cold blood for absolutely no reason. I'd hardly call that "feel good BS where the good guys won".

      I could also throw out "The Pegasus" where Riker lied to coverup illegal experiments with cloaking technology (how's that for moral ambiguity?) or "Preemptive Strike" where Ro backstabs Picard and saves the Maquis from destruction (how did the Good Guys win in that episode?).

      Don't even dare to suggest that Enterprise is halfway as good as TNG was. I'd stack TNG against Enterprise anyday of the week. I don't think your criticism is valid.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  89. or fourth series, whatever by aurelian · · Score: 1

    **karma burns in a storm of trekkie flames**

  90. Temporal Cold War? by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone remember that? The Suliban and all that? What happened to it?

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
    1. Re:Temporal Cold War? by afish40 · · Score: 1
      I think this whole situation with the Xindi is a small facet of a larger temporal cold war.

      On another note, I hate that phrase. "Temporal cold war". It gets my blood boiling even more than "metrosexual" or "WMD". Back in the days before they tore Florida a new one, they were saying it like it was going out of style.

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    2. Re:Temporal Cold War? by MasterRa · · Score: 0

      Indeed, i too wondered what happend with the Suliban. Seemed line they were just toast one day. But now as the end of Season 3 is shaping up (almost hear i guess), it is begining to look like it's all supposed to be tied in somehow. As though perhaps the people helping the Xindi are the same ones that were helping the Suliban.
      Anyway..

  91. Love the show, great to hear the news! by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

    If you haven't watched Enterprise lately, you'll be in for a treat the next two Wednesdays. The last several epiosdes have been absolutely riveting. Just check your Trek-continuity dogma at the door :-). A little piece I wrote about why this is a good show:

    http://66.51.173.18/cgi/gofuton.cgi?action=rant& id =20040513_enterprise

    As far as the move to Friday, I think it will be a good thing. If anything, maybe they can attract Smallville viewers.

    Kudos to the thousands of hard-core fans who pestered UPN for months to keep the show! You can make a difference.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
  92. ObFamilyGuyQuote by UdoKeir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chris Griffin: Where do you think you go when you die?
    Southern boy: I learned from church that if you're good you go to heaven but if you're bad, you go to a place where the dead believe they're still living and they pray for death but death won't come.
    Chris Griffin: UPN?

  93. Captures the mood? by solios · · Score: 1

    No wonder my first impression of Enterprise was that it sucked the shit out of a dead man's ass. >_

    I cooled on Trek when I read about the Voyager cast (the Doctor being an obvious Red Dwarf rip and Neelix being too annoying for words)... I was hoping Enterprise wouldn't suck ass, but between the obvious T&A, the HORRIBLE intro music (this is Space : The Final Frontier, not DAWSONS CREEK) and a plot synopsis with the words "temporal cold war" in it, well.... other production companies have been doing much better with much less for much longer- without shitting all over their own continuities.

    1. Re:Captures the mood? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      "temporal cold war" in it, well.... other production companies have been doing much better with much less for much longer- without shitting all over their own continuities.

      Has it occurred to anyone that the continuity glitches might be intentional? After all, it's always possible that the Change War might fix some of these doxie-glitches in passing as we proceed down the years....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:Captures the mood? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has it occurred to you that time travel plots are stupid? You might as well do "It was all a dream..." like in soap operas.

    3. Re:Captures the mood? by solios · · Score: 1

      I'm with the AC. Time travel in the trek universe has historically been a joke- contrast against Red Dwarf (which does it for humor and still does it better), or Babylon 5 or 12 Monkeys (both of which use time travel effectively as part of a storyline in which time travel affects the larger whole, rather than breaking it.)

      The only amusing Time Travel episode I've seen of Trek is the "Trouble with Tribbles" "sequel" episode of DS9- though episodes of TNG dealing with stasis (being "stuck" in time, vehicles and personnel from the past) are more plausible.

      Saying the TCW will fix screwups of Trek continuity (such as it is) is like saying the Segway will fix walking. Ain't happening.

    4. Re:Captures the mood? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Never said they'd succeed in fixing it. Just suggested that they might have done it on purpose, with the INTENTION of fixing it. Personally, I'm indifferent to the show - I watched the first half dozen episodes, then stopped when I cancelled my cable (wasn't worth paying for cable for an hour a week of TV I actually watched)

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  94. If you look in my comment history by dupper · · Score: 1
    You'll find a long history of anti-Enterprise comments. I even stopped watching altogether, for most of the last season and a half. So, inevitably, I've made an ass of myself by attacking repeatedly based on out of date information ([Insert Cheap Bush Jab Here]). I watched the last two episodes of this season, though, and realized the show has found itself: those episodes were not just 'good for Enterprise', they were plain good. Of course, I've completely missed the story of this Xindi arc, but I was able to follow, well enough.

    Why was it bad? Well, there's the obvious: the Bryan-Adams-would-call-it-pussy-rock theme song, the T&A pandering, the timeline-mangling, desperate gimmickery of bringing in the Borg and the Ferengi; all this just a stupid, doomed-to-fail attempt at attracting Joe Fucktard to the show (which is why they didn't call it 'Star Trek: Enterprise'), that just ended up alienating their core fanbase of nerds and geeks *. But, ignoring this, my theory is that they moved too soon into character stories. With the other shows, you got to know a character through their everyday performance on duty before they took you deep into their personal life. But, with Enterprise, every other episode is was damned soap opera, with characters you don't care about. With TNG, they could get more personal, because they had characters you couldn't help but be fascinated with from the beginning (Data, Worf). But Enterprise has no such characters. This keeps it from being a great show, but getting too deep into those characters it has before the audience gets a chance to get familiar with them kept it from being a good show.

    Why is it good? Well, moving to a continuous story arc, instead of individual episodes, is a major part of it. My opinion is that all the good Sci-Fi concepts that the Star Trek universe can handle without seeming too contrived have been done to death, by the previous four series. This is why the last few seasons of DS9, with the Dominion War story arc, were so much better than the last few seasons of Voyager, which just rehashed old TNG episodes, with maybe a dozen decent ones (a subject for further ranting, in itself). DS9 then, and Enterprise now, are no longer Sci-Fi: they're Space Opera. And that's the only place Star Trek, in it's current form (ie, not the 'Star Trek Adventures' idea) can thrive.

    * For whom the producers have repeatedly shown contempt, as if our dollars aren't as good as the MTV set's; actually, everyone involved in the production does this, but the actors usually have some sort of breakdown and epiphany, come around to accept they'll never be cool to the cool people, and accept and embrace their adoring, dorky public(see: Leonard Nimoy, Wil Wheaton).

  95. Warning Fouth season plot spoiler by MrLint · · Score: 1

    In order to enchance continutity with future star trek series, producer Rick Berman will fall victim to a horribly debilitating transporter accident.

  96. For those lamenting this renewal. by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

    Fear not! Dr. Who returns to the airwaves in 2005. And thankfully, it's only at it's "Next Generation" phase.

    CJF

    1. Re:For those lamenting this renewal. by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It is? Isn't this like the 9th Doctor? For myself- I only liked the 4th Doctor, all others didn't have the right combination of Humor/Fashion Sense/Robotic Dog.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  97. Star Trek Nap Time by beatleadam · · Score: 1

    IMHO 'Enterprise' has been renewed for a fourth season... is a BIG mistake.

    Think about it, the readers here on /. already were psyched up (Heh..."out" I should say perhaps) for the series to end and now all that has occured is a temporary life support system has been installed. The show still is the worst of the Star Trek group and (again...IMHO) with that said, the whold Star Trek Universe needs to go into Hibernation for a few years to *ahem* charge its batteries shall we say...

    What would Gene Roddenberry think about this series?

    --
    I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  98. Ah Enterprise. Ask not for whom by plexxer · · Score: 1

    the Friday timeslot tolls, it tolls for thee.

    --
    The government's moral compass is controlled by GPS.
    In times of crises, they alter it to suit their needs.
  99. Re:Good news... man... by beanluc · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Dude abides...

    the Dude abides.

    Don't take it personally. It's not like DrEldarion or the Enterprise producers peed on your rug.

    I'd be upset if Enterprise were cancelled... for me, JoJo Bla-Lo really ties the room together

    Anyway, nobody told you to silence your opinion. We just have an OPINION about how awesome it is ... not.

    --
    Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
  100. Why do nights matter? by Arethereanyleft · · Score: 1

    With DVRs so prevalent these days, what does it matter when a TV show comes on? Heck, I haven't watched live TV since I bought my first VCR 20 years ago!

  101. Spoiler. by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    Hoshi dies the last episode this season.

    OK, I don' t know that for a fact, but that' s my guess, going by what the season finale teasers are showing.

    1. Re:Spoiler. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Too bad, if true, as I like Hoshi, but the actress definitely needs to restart her career - Enterprise is doing nothing for her aside from providing a steady paycheck.

  102. StarGate SG-1 puts any StarTrek to complete shame by alain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am a fan of StarTrek. I have watched every single episode ever made of the original series, TNG, DSN, Voyager, or Enterprise (and all movies).

    That said, after I started to watch StarGate SG-1, and I am watching them on DVD (I am on Season 6 now), I have realized what a terrible terrible series the StarTrek series (any flavor) really is. The writing in SG-1 is miles better than any of the drivel written in StarTrek.

    My brothers and I joke around that the writers of StarTrek should be forced to watch the SG-1 series, as a "seminar" for them on how to write good sci-fi scripts.

    - Alain

  103. Re:Good news... man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhh... what would slashdot do without unoriginal types quoting from Coen brothers' movies.

  104. Is bad Science Fiction better then no Sci-Fi? by ageoffri · · Score: 1
    I've seen people say if you don't like it, don't watch it. Yet Enterprise has been so bad that I'm worried it will turn off more people from Science Fiction, thus making it harder for new Science Fiction shows to be made. Firefly aired in the right order and at a better time slot would have done great. Enterprise has had a good time slot and isn't doing all that great!

    In the last decade I can think of only 2 really good Science Fiction shows, Babylon 5 and Jerimah. I would much rather see decent Science Fiction shows made, even Andromeda is fairly entertaining.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
  105. Rumor by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    There had been a rumor the Berman might get the axe at one point? Is that still a possibility?

    Get someone in there who cares more about the quality of the show then about demographics and the show will definatly get better.

  106. The ST series I want to see. by soldeed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I find the usual format of star trek (one captain/crew/ship) limiting. After all there is supposed to be an entire FLEET of ships zooming around the galaxy, but it seems there is ever only ONE ship having interesting adventures. I would like to see a anthology ST series, sort of like the old Police stories series where you feature a different ship/crew every week (or two). You could use the premise of history lessons at starfleet academy to set up each episode and tie the series together. It could be called 'Star fleet chronicles' or some such. Of course, whatever type of series they make, they need better, more imaginative scripts, that aren't retreads of the same old tired themes. (time travel, alien possesion, ect.) That and I wish they paid more attention to continuity. I don't read Star Trek novels, because they have nothing to do with series or movie cannon.

    1. Re:The ST series I want to see. by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      The weakness is that you can run a show based on characters that develop in time. You have to hope that every script kills, like Twilight Zone. I'd like to see that kind of ST too, but only if they could get the cream of the sci-fi writing crop.

      Could you imagine Joss Whedon or J. Michael Straczynski kicking in a script? Wouldn't it be funny if they could get Kiefer Sutherland and Carlos Bernard on the same crew? William J Peterson would be fun to see as a captain...

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re:The ST series I want to see. by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 1

      The main problem you have with this is that almost all scripted television works with a set cast - Jolene Blalock and Scott Bakula weren't just brought in for their acting or looks, but because they'd play characters that fans would tune in to see every week.

      The idea is great for novelization, or graphic novels, or computer games, but for weekly television, and the demands set by casual fans and network executives, it just doesn't work that way.

    3. Re:The ST series I want to see. by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      The main problem you have with this is that almost all scripted television works with a set cast

      I can name TWO shows off the top of my head that don't have regular casts, (though they may have regular guest apprances by one or more actors) and thats the Twilight Zone and Outer Limits.
      I think the idea of a Star Trek Chronicles is a good idea, and could be done, kinda like how Outer Limits, (is the new one still on or in repeats??), or the Twilight Zone have been done. >br> That being said it would allow for old timers, like the TNG, DS9, and Voyager crews to come back for an episode or two and still be able to go about there careers not locking themselves down to one series anda rigirous shooting schedule.

    4. Re:The ST series I want to see. by soldeed · · Score: 1
      The main problem you have with this is that almost all scripted television works with a set cast - Jolene Blalock and Scott Bakula weren't just brought in for their acting or looks, but because they'd play characters that fans would tune in to see every week.

      The classic series I referenced, police story, as well as Twilight zone were quite successful without regular casts. But that's why I suggested the starfleet academy history lesson as a device to tie the series together. Your stars would be the history professor, who would introduce the key characters and situations portrayed, (sorta like Rod Serling) and the students with whom he would discuss the critical decisions and actions of the featured crews as well as their effects on federation history. You could also have interesting side plots involving the students and faculty.

      Another great thing you could do is feature stories about Vulcan or Klingon or other races ships besides just the federations. I thought one of the most interesting parts of the first ST movie was the Klingons battle with vger. Imagine whole stories involving alien crews!

    5. Re:The ST series I want to see. by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Actually, after three seasons of Enterprise, I'm pretty happy with the characters in the show. No Wesley Crushers (Sorry clevernick, they kicked you out just when your character was getting interesting). No deanna trois! No Neelix! Good, solid, personable characters. All the characters have a serious side to them, which is exactly what us GenX'ers are expecting to see.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    6. Re:The ST series I want to see. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      After all there is supposed to be an entire FLEET of ships zooming around the galaxy, but it seems there is ever only ONE ship having interesting adventures.

      Indeed - who would ever sign up for duty on the Enterprise? Every week the ship is under threat of being reduced to ashes, and every third week you'll get to bear the weight of being responsible for the life and death of all of humanity. That's gotta cause ulcers...

  107. New Shatner plan shat out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  108. New Star Trek by BRSloth · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for a new Trek Series:

    Star Trek: Galaxy Quest

    It's about time for a parody (and "Galaxy Quest" was just a movie; I want a series where every episode the captain cries "Khaaaan!" for no reason).

  109. How to stop ratings from dropping by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Well....

    I hate to say it, but if they want a quick fix for ratings. Just add more sex appeal like they did with voyager.

    Contrary to many trekkers snearing at the idea. I LIKE the idea of adding gratuitous sex to the series!

  110. Geeks everywhere in shock by AwesomeJT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Gosh, I can't believe we made it to season 4! Many didn't think they would make it beyond day 4! Of course, whatelse are you going to watch these days? Yet another season of Survivor? Our the next installment of slutty guy/girls sleeping with each other on national TV pretending to pursue a "real" relationship? With shows like these, STE should do well next year. :)

    --
    SPAM solution made easy: 1 spammer, 5 cords of rope, 5 hourses, and fireworks. Be creative.
    1. Re:Geeks everywhere in shock by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      What am I going to watch? Joan of Arcadia.

      What else? Sopranos, Dead Like Me, 24, SG-1, Smallville, Will & Grace, and mebbe a little Carnivale, Deadwood, and CSI.

      Hint: A galactic federation with military starships and military characters does not equal good science fiction.

      I will certainly enjoy friday nights more than you will.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  111. Re:Let Trek Die With What Dignity It Still HAs Lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whiner.

  112. Ummm... by Otto · · Score: 1

    And of course there's no tension, because we all know (since it's a prequel) that Earth isn't going to be destroyed.

    Dude, I hate to break it to you, but I'm pretty sure that the Earth is going to be destroyed, or at least seriously screwed in some fashion. Look, you've got time travellers always zipping about the place, so expect next season to be all about that and trying to get the Earth restored, sort of thing.

    I mean, what better way to ensure a continuing plot line than to completely rewrite history every season? Sounds exactly like something B&B would do. And hey, what a cliffhanger season finale, right?

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Ummm... by afish40 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Star Trek has generally been pretty good at not royally screwing over the timeline. Instead, it generally turns out that changes that occur in the past were supposed to happen in such a fashion.

      Case in point: in TNG episode "Time's Arrow", the crew stumbles upon Data's severed head from the past. Eventually, they end up traveling back in time, and Data's head gets severed. This didn't change the past, because it already happened. Similarly, in an episode of Voyager, Seven of Nine commented on the fact that the Borg were present when Zephram Cochran blasted off into space and met the Vulcans. The Borg being there didn't adversely affect the timeline, because that's the way events transpired (this was further proven when Archer et al found the frozen Borg on Earth in Enterprise.

      So I seriously doubt Earth is going to be destroyed, since we've seen Earth once or twice in the other Treks.

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    2. Re:Ummm... by Chrondeath · · Score: 1
      Look, you've got time travellers always zipping about the place, so expect next season to be all about that and trying to get the Earth restored, sort of thing.

      You mean Scott Bakula might have to go back in time, to put right what once went wrong?

    3. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whata bout the DS9 ep, "past tense?"

      Where Sisko inadvertantly ends up leading a worker revolution in 2024 sanfrancisco.

    4. Re:Ummm... by AsylumWraith · · Score: 1

      As Gabriel Bell, which is exactly what was supposed to happen. ;)

  113. Ordered back to work??? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Okay... maybe I'm misreading this, but that phraseology makes it sound like the actors were formerly away from work on account of strike action by them, which was in violation of some sort of contract agreement. But if that were the case, how was it that they ever ended up away from work in the first place? Why wouldn't any such contract have automatically expired right away, once it was believed to be the case that the show was unlikely to return?

  114. In other news pre-prequil to Enterprise by zakezuke · · Score: 1
    Where no caveman has gone before!

    Captain's log: Stonedate 25,000 years B.C.!
    That's right, ol' buddy, ol' pal... humans were traveling in space long before you thought they were!
    HOW?
    Back in those days, the expanding universe was a lot smaller than it is nowadays, so the stars were easier to reach!


    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  115. The enemy isn't the Xindi by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

    It's the Sphere-Builders.

    And it's already been speculated on some of the email lists that the Sphere-Builders are actually the Founders, before they figured out how to exist in our space (albeit in "liquid" form).

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
  116. Yeah, but it gave us the best Star Trek quote ever by bonch · · Score: 1

    Riker: They were just sucked into space.
    Data: Blown, sir.
    Riker: Sorry, Data.
    Data: Common mistake, sir.
    (The Naked Now)

  117. Re:Good news... man... by beanluc · · Score: 1

    Or, Simpsons, South Park, Dr. Who, or, like, even, yknow, like ST-TOS, man.

    It's actually pretty fun when someone else starts it.

    --
    Say it right: "Nuc-le-ah Powah".
  118. Why Archer is captain of the Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty obvious why Archer was picked to be the captain now. He's a tactical moron. He's extremely emotional. He violates ethical rules without blinking. He has the diplomatic skills of a rabid wolverine. He doesn't grasp the concept of morale. And the only way to give him morals is to infect him with alien goo.

    If this guy was under my command, I'd want to send him as far away from my planet as possible too. It's a shame losing the dog too.

  119. To answer your subject line by bonch · · Score: 1

    Because a small niche of people considering a show "good" isn't enough to combat the other 90% of the population who couldn't care less. If people aren't watching, it's an expense to the network to keep producing the show.

  120. It's a TV show for cryin' out loud. by whats_a_zip · · Score: 1

    I like Enterprise. No, I really like Entrprise. It's not high art, it's not religion, it's entertainment! And they are getting better. At times even a little gritty, (a good thing). Remember back, TOS - ground breaking, but some really dopey episodes. And the constant attempts at levity got really annoying. TNG - Data's constant navel gazing: "Why am I not a real little boy Geppetto?". The lame holodeck vehicle for plots. DS9 - One of the best, from what I've seen, but they kept moving the darn thing, and it took that show 3 years to find a groove. VOYAGER - Gilligan's Island meets Star Trek. That show was lost in many ways. I tried to hang in with it, I really did. Ick. I like that Enterpise has real challenges. Things that don't work. They can't just blast whatever they see. The effects are good, as are most, but still, credit where it's due. The cast is good, I like the characters. Even Archer, he's played as a guy under real stress, not some comic book character. Don't get me wrong, TOS was very good. TNG was good, at times, when it didn't try to preach too much. (Thanks for the Borg). I need to catch up on DS9. But I don't miss Enterprise. I have refused Neilson boxes in the past, but if offered again, I'll take it and tune in to Enterprise.

  121. It must be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy fucking christ you're a nerd.

    1. Re:It must be said by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 1

      I came up with a witty, pithy response to that, but it's in Klingon, so you wouldn't understand it.

      Who's the nerd now, huh?

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  122. saveenterprise.com should rot in hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enterprise is the worst StarTrek yet. IT DESERVES TO DIE. Scott Bacula is, by far, the WORST captain of the enterprise (yes, I'm including Janeway in that comparison). Every Star Trek show has always centered around a strong captain. Not anymore! Capt. Archer is the biggest fucking pussy I've ever seen. Being ex-military, I can assure you that no one in the military would do what that wimp ordered. The show is a disaster and needs to be put out of its misery for godsakes.

    Thanks saveenterprise.com. Thanks for saving a piece of shit show that deserved to be cancelled the first fucking year you fucking retards.

  123. A slightly different thought by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    >Fire Berman and his team and hire some REAL writers (DC Fontana, Diane Duane, Diane Carey, Peter David, all old Trek hands who "got it"), and maybe Trek will start not-sucking again.

    While I can agree with DC Fontana, The other 3 I don't agree with.

    At least Diane Duane needs to do some more homework on how things work in the current military before transposing it forward. It isn't the "overall" picture, but some of the little things that she misses.

    And one in particular which she based a whole book upon was contradicted in TNG, just as I told her it would be (via Fidonet, back in the 90s).

  124. Easy, I won't watch anything by bonch · · Score: 1

    It's been a long time since I really watched any television.

  125. Kind of a stereotype by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "They've already began to fracture the enemy, an interesting twist. The Xinidi reptilians and perhaps the insectoids look as though they will remain evil"

    Who would have ever thought that the bugs and lizards would be the evil races, while the sloths, man-likes, and manatees would be good?

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  126. Re:Good news... man... by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

    Kaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhnnnn!!!!

  127. Ironic news, more like... by Chalybeous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We can but hope that Berman gets cancelled. A quote attributed to Star Trek: The Motion Picture and Star Trek: The Next Generation artist Andrew Probert opines that Berman doesn't know jack about scifi...

    Personally, I think the mooted Friday-night slot is ironic, the final nail in the coffin. Anyone remember where classic Trek was put by the network for its third season before cancellation?
    Yup. Friday night. When its core audience was out doing other things, the sort of things young people, young adults, do... if they'd had demographics back then, the advertisers would've run away in droves. (As it is, they didn't bring in the demographics til much later - and classic Trek proved, in syndication, to be an ideal show for the advertisers to hit certain groups.)

    As an ex-Trekkie, all I can say is... roll on those Friday nights, I'm waiting to see the /. headline: Berman on Enterprise: "It's dead, Jim."

    (Or, admittedly, a clip of Dean Stockwell on the bridge, saying something like, "Uhh, Sam... you're not really a starship captain...") ;-)

    --

    "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    1. Re:Ironic news, more like... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people consider Friday night to be the kiss of death, but consider this:

      The X Files originally aired in the Friday night timeslot, and is one of the few shows to thrive under such conditions. As a show with fresh ideas and excellent presentation, people stayed in to watch.

      While I have enjoyed some of the episodes of Enterprise this season, if it's not creative and gripping enough to survive on a Friday night, it's not worth saving. Let's see how it performs next season.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    2. Re:Ironic news, more like... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      As a show with fresh ideas and excellent presentation

      I don't see how a TV series that started in 1965 and has run continuously for the past 15 years (sometimes with 2 versions active at once) can have "fresh ideas" left.

      The ideas of the X-Files were derivative of many things, but they hadn't been on TV (recently). But I gave up watching Star Trek well before Voyager, because they'd given up pretending to do more than repeat the same 5 plots over and over.

      After several years, X-Files repeated itself too- "Oh, another killer mutant. What organ is this one attacking humans for? Liver, stomach, brain, heart, blood, stomach, cancer, epidermis... spleen?"

    3. Re:Ironic news, more like... by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

      (Or, admittedly, a clip of Dean Stockwell on the bridge, saying something like, "Uhh, Sam... you're not really a starship captain...") ;-)

      That would be great.

    4. Re:Ironic news, more like... by Chalybeous · · Score: 1

      I don't see how a TV series that started in 1965 and has run continuously for the past 15 years (sometimes with 2 versions active at once) can have "fresh ideas" left.

      That's why my profile says "recovering ex-Trekkie" - because it just continually recycled, went from cutting-edge to bland, and in the end was reduced to telling the same story every week for seven years. (Voyager - the only Trek that boldly blows like no Trek has blown before!) Farscape, on the other hand, knew its cliches and played to them - to the point of inserting Trek jokes and other pop-culture references (just about the only good thing to come out of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, aside from Alyson Hannigan) - but it was also terribly innovative with twisting the sorts of things you'd expect in a scifi universe, and with using puppetry where Trek instead used latex noses.
      I do have friends interested in Trek fandom, and sometimes we discuss how it could've been done better. At the time of writing there are a few dozen pages of notes on the ol' hard disk, which I'll use for my own (non-Trek) scifi scribblings... eventually.

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

    5. Re:Ironic news, more like... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Berman has seen enough of the series to get the reference...

    6. Re:Ironic news, more like... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      The ideas of the X-Files were derivative of many things, but they hadn't been on TV (recently).

      Note that I carefully chose my wording. I mentioned that the ideas had to be "fresh," not "new." There is very little "new" on TV, but if you let old ides lie long enough, they become "fresh" once again. This is one of the reasons TNG was so successful, and also a reason why every trek series since hasn't come close.

      I think B&Bs' one saving grace this season is that they're trying to make Star Trek "fresh" again. They're throwing away the entire known history of the UFP and building it from scratch, distancing themselves as much as possible from the "known" Star Trek universe. It's risky, and I seriously think they could fuck up completely by taking it too far or not distancing themselves enough, but it takes a gamble like that to save a series.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    7. Re:Ironic news, more like... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I think B&Bs' one saving grace this season is that they're trying to make Star Trek "fresh" again.

      The most surefire way to do that would be to actually allow a gap, and not fight to have new Star Trek come out every single year. After an abscense, the same old ideas seem "fresher" (and with no more effort from the producers)

      throwing away the entire known history of the UFP and building it from scratch, distancing themselves as much as possible from the "known" Star Trek universe.

      The details of the backdrop aren't so important. What matters is the fact that they still have a government-sponsored spaceship filled with humans and 1-2 token aliens that randomly wanders into one dangerous encounter after another.

      Creating a new bunch of names for the props and makeup is a fairly minor change. (And they're not even really going to do that. They've already forgone the chance to have a ship that is unequipped with Transporters and Phasers)

    8. Re:Ironic news, more like... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for him to say, "Oh boy..."

      --

      +++ATH0
  128. UPN Renews 'Star Trek: Enterprise' by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


    Baaaarrrrrf.....oh wait, sweaty cleavage...yay!

    --
    Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  129. Lack of fan interest by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Informative
    "Indeed, i too wondered what happend with the Suliban."

    I think it was lack of fan interest. The Tal..er Suliban did not impress anyone the way they had hoped, so they were pulled. The same thing happend with the Ferengi in ST:TNG. Roddenberry expected them to be the major adversaries of the entire series, but once these snarling barely-sentient Perot's saw the light of day no-one was impressed and they too were pretty much phased out until they were re-tooled for DS9.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Lack of fan interest by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      And the same thing happened to those godawful Kazon in Voyager. Remember those? The klingons with pinecones instead of crabs for heads?

      DS9 had a pretty good run with the Dominion in all their different guises, the Cardassians (also good enemies at the latter half of TNG).

      Voyager did much better once they ditched the Kazon and picked up the Borg and that fluidic-space species (4276?) as enemies.

      Enterprise has great potential, they should be drumming up the Orions, the Gorn, the Klingons, the Romulans, and not mucking about with completely uninteresting species like the suliban. Having said that the Xindi could have worked out better as a nemesis, but I think they're doing okay.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    2. Re:Lack of fan interest by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "And the same thing happened to those godawful Kazon in Voyager. Remember those? The klingons with pinecones instead of crabs for heads?"

      I always thought that they looked like overgrown Oompa-Loompa's whom someone had given a swirly in a salad bowl.

      "Enterprise has great potential, they should be drumming up the Orions, the Gorn, the Klingons, the Romulans"

      When the show was sputtering along during the first two seasons, I made the argument that they should bring in the Kzinti. The show does, after all, take place around the time of Kzinti first contact. The orange rat-cats would have added a splash of color on a show that might as well be watched on a black-and-white set.

      Alas, what do they do for Season 3? Bring in a race whose name is pronounced almost like Kzinti, but has no other similarities.

      "Voyager did much better once they ditched the Kazon and picked up the Borg and that fluidic-space species (4276?) as enemies"

      For just a little while. They managed to wear out the Borg and make them seem banal. The fluid-space aliens never impressed me because they made the mistake of showing them: the crude texture and motion made them seem like N-64 videogame characters. Rather sub-par.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Lack of fan interest by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      True, the Borg were a seemingly undefeatable foe that somehow got relegated to the same threat levels as Klingons. They diluted just about every unmitigatable threat that the borg posed when they were first introduced, ie, that they were unstoppable, they would not negotiate, they knew no mercy, fear, or pity.

      So the first thing the Voyager crew does is humanise them.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  130. Re:StarGate SG-1 puts any StarTrek to complete sha by corsican · · Score: 1
    And yet, now they are flying around in a starship!

    --
    --If something I said could be taken two ways, and one of those ways made you cry, then I meant the other way.
  131. What's wrong with Friday? by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    I've never understood the complaints about fridays. I mean as a parent of a 2 yr old and a 8 month old Friday evenings are no different except I might stay up a bit later because I can sleep in until 7:30 or 8:00 in the morning before my kids wake us both up.

    There's nothing on Fridays except for Third Watch. Everything else is worthless in my opinion, I hate 'reality' television and I'm glad to see something will be on Friday as we move forward.

    Farscape did well on Fridays, Firefly didn't do well not because of the time slot, but because of the out of order playing & the lack of network support. I've been watching the DVDs and keep wonder what the hell were they thinking cancelling that. Great story/character development, and I wasn't an Angel/Buffy fan either.

    Oh well, I for one shall TiVo it every week just like I have been. Now they can be on one TiVo so now I can watch it th day it was aired so that my two TiVo's aren't competeing and trying to figure out the Smallville/That 70's Show/ST: Ent conflict.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  132. Heading to get the Xindi, Yea, Brother.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Quite full circle, considering the Original 60's series got a last-minute reprieve to a Friday Night slot.

    "Spock's Brain", "And the Children Shall Lead", "Way to Eden". Yep, worth the renewal.

    Hail, hail, fire and stone...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  133. Cancelling the Mullets before the franchise by ianscot · · Score: 1
    In the case of the Mullets, it wasn't just "camera men, editors, (and) janitors." A lot of hair stylists hit the unemployment line, too, dang it. But back to our question: Is producing a mediocre show or movie "better than nothing"?

    Star Wars Episodes one and two made money. For their producers they were better than nothing, no question. For the soul of the series, they were unmitigated disasters. The really amazing movie in the series, Empire..., now looks worse as a result of being in the same room with Jar Jar.

    Do we really need other examples of your point about damaging the franchise? Try the cartoon Lord of the Rings -- that set back Tolkien mania for a long time, and it's really not as bad a disaster as people say, it was just ordinarily mediocre for its time.

    Personally I'm not really rooting against Enterprise, because other than TNG there hasn't been a Star Trek series for me since I was 10. I don't really care either way. But then, that kind of underscores your point...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  134. Andromeda Is *Not* Cancelled by WombatControl · · Score: 1

    Although the studio may be in serious legal trouble, the fifth season of Andromeda is still a go - the casting sheets have already been sent out, and the preproduction process has been on for about a week now.

    I've no idea how (or why) it was saved, as the show was never that good to begin with and went downhill from there, but the reports of its death have been greatly exagerrated.

  135. Re:StarGate SG-1 puts any StarTrek to complete sha by hcuar · · Score: 1

    Alain, I couldn't agree with you more. Stargate SG-1 is a masterpiece. The plot is consistent and well written. It amazes me how many different stories they can come up with.

    Jim

  136. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    Funny, Stargate SG-1 seems to be kicking ass on Friday nights... (and saturday and sunday especially monday also tuesday and wednesday and thursday etc)

    --
    [o]_O
  137. Good series by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    but when do hoshi and t-pol get it on in the name of science and vulcan-human peace? mmmmmmmm peace :)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  138. Threat by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If you don't stop complaning, we will bring back Wesley Crusher!

    - Trek Production Crew

    1. Re:Threat by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Shh, or "DumbNickName" will show up!

      "Wesley"? In *MY* day, we had Ensigns with more manly names, like "Pavel".

  139. My gripe with Enterprise by leereyno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My gripe with this show is that it seems to be little more than a vehicle for leftist propaganda. It only makes a half-hearted attempt at being subtle in this regard. I was greatly concerned the first time I saw captain Archer whine at the Klingons. Playing the pussy diplomat may be consistent with modern euro-centric left-wing political ideology, but it just doesn't work in the real world, unless of course you're trying to get someone to attack you. The episode about AIDS, disguised as a vulcan mind disease, was particularly insulting. I don't know about you, but I've been fully aware of the AIDS epidemic for about 20 years now. I really don't need a TV show to preach to me about it.

    What Enterprise needs to do is hire some of the writers from Farscape and wrest control away from the ideologues who think the show is there so they can propagandize.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by wwest4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > My gripe with this show is that it seems to be little more than a vehicle for
      > leftist propaganda.

      The two examples you cite aren't left-right issues. Interventionism vs. isolationism is usually polarizing, but liberals and conservatives alternate positions regarding this issue depending on the circumstances. You need only to compare the circumstances surrounding the first world wars and the current nid for expansion of the Pax Americana. In that sense, maybe Enterprise writers are just isolationists, and not necessarily liberals.

      On the other hand, things like "righteous" violence, pre-emptive strikes, and torture are routinely used and even glorified on current Trek episodes. I'd say pacifism, opposition to institutional violence and abhorrence of first-strike policies are fundamentally liberal, and Trek tramples on these ideas regularly in favor of a more bloodlusty rhetoric.

      The AIDS analog was clearly pro-secularist, but again that doesn't necessarily make it liberal propaganda. Even conservative champ Bill O'Reilly, when talking about his stance as an independent, talks about secularism and liberalism as separate (evil) causes, and I think he's essentially correct regarding their separation. Take Turkey - they have a secularist government that is also pretty conservative (right-wing) on the authoritarian axis.

    2. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you've been watching lately, you may notice that it's not quite as leftist as it was before. Archer has ordered the death of some Xindi because it was faster than, say, capturing them. They also boarded a ship and stole their warp coil. Those sound like something that conservatives would be happy with, what with their disregard for the well-being of others outside their own little circles.

    3. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the beginning, I'd agree with you. Archer was the worst choice for captain on the ship (characters, not actors). He was incompetant and whiny. AND he only got the job because his dad built the ship.

      Now they've tried to make him into a post 9/11, torturing badass (innocent people no less), just like on half the shows on television. This completely abandons the Star Trek premise of a hopeful future and instead turns it into another imperialist propaganda piece. It may have started as left-wing propaganda, but now it's just neocon propaganda. Although I believe that the two sides are ideologically closer than they think (left & psuedo-right), it's not quite leftist anymore.

      They need a middle ground. They said the show was gonna be gritty. The first season had them as the biggest pussies in the ST universe. Now they have delta force teams. Gritty gave me hope for more of a Babylon 5 or Farscape feel with 3 dimensional characters. When will producers understand that it's always the characters that make a show great? There's not a single character on this show that I give a damn about (well, I can tolerate Reed). The only thing that re-energized Voyager was introducing 7 of 9. And not just because of her incredible hip-to-waist ratio, but because the character was the first interesting one on the show.

    4. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mark me as a troll, but need I remind you that it wasn't the "modern euro-centric" countries that have been attacked over the last couple of years. Seems to me that it has been the neo-con USian cowboys who've had planes and trains thrown at them. So what was that you were saying "unless you are trying to get someone to attack you"? Tell me again how that is "the real world?"

      Man, you should be on K5 - turing a discussion of the worst Star Trek series into a right-wing diatribe....

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    5. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by leereyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why was the US attacked on September 11th instead of say, Italy, Belgium or Germany? The reasons are simple.

      First of all, we matter when it comes to what goes on in the world. Europe is stuck in this fantasy of their own continued relevance much the same way that many in Britian didn't understand that their empire was gone after WW-II. Europe believes in limp-wristed diplomacy because they live in an artificial bubble created by US military power. the same could be said of much of the first world. If anyone went after Japan the US seventh fleet would give them an "edjumacation." If anyone picked on Canada we'd probably bomb them into the stone age because some of us remember that Canada was right there with us on D-day. The same goes for Australia for that matter. So many citizens of first world nations forget that the reason they haven't had to worry about being invaded and conquered by a foreign aggressor, like say the Soviet Union, is because the US has been there to back them up. This lapse in memory and judgement has persisted for so long that some have even fallen prey to the fantasy that military power isn't relevant anymore. History has a name for such people, it calls them victims.

      The second reason why we were attacked is that we back Israel. From what I understand Israel is hated in Europe, which may be more a case of anti-semitism than anything else, it is hard to say. In any case the islamic terrorists are smart enough to know that Europe doesn't like Israel much more than they do.

      Third, and this is most important, the islamic terrorists were not afraid of us. Why? Because for 8 years the Clinton administration didn't do a damned thing about them. Terrorists, led by an Iraqi intelligence officer, attempted to topple the world trade center in '93. What did we do? We pretended it was a criminal justice issue. Our embassy was bombed and what did we do? Nothing really. The Cole had a big hole blown into it and what did we do? Wringed our hands and pretended that we were working with Yemen to find the people responsible. In short we did the very thing I found fault with Archer's character for, we showed weakness. The surest way to encourage an aggressor is to show weakness. I remember after the 9/11 attacks there were all these dizzy idiots asking why the terrorists hated us so much. The truth is that while it doesn't matter, the reason they hate us because we represent everything they are not and will likely never be. Trying to win the love of a people who resent us is both futile and foolish. First because it won't work, and second because it doesn't matter if they like us or not. The only thing that matters is whether they fear us or not. Fear is a more constant emotion than love. Love waxes and wanes with mood and the seaons. Fear, especially if it is reinforced periodically by reminding them of why they should fear us, is a wonderfully effective tool for peace. Had the islamic world been scared shitless of us we never would have been attacked. It was Clinton's foreign policy failures that led to 9/11, not anything we "neo-con USian cowboys" did.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    6. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why people hate America. This is why America is going to be destroyed. MY GOD MAN, listen to what you are saying! Violence begets violence.

    7. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way America can be destroyed is from within, which is something the loony left is hard at work accomplishing.

    8. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to mod you down. But then I reread your post and realized the brilliance of it.

      You managed legitimately connect a complain about the plot of a star trek series... to Clinton. And that is just fucking amazing.

    9. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by mark2003 · · Score: 1

      How can this be modded as "insightful"? Is there not a "mental rant" mod?

      Firstly - Europe believes in diplomacy because we have suffered the effects of two major wars in living history on our soil. Our parents and grandparents were subjected to bombing, fighting in their streets, soldiers raping and pillaging etc. They, and the younger generations, do not want this to be repeated. Starting wars without first attempting all other possible avenues just increases the likelihood of this happening again.

      Secondly - you don't understand. Europe does not hate Isreal or Jews - what it does not approve of is one nation subjugating another through force of arms to "protect" their own security.

      Thirdly - fear breeds hate. Hate breeds violence. It's called a vicious circle, back in the dark ages many invading forces realised the only way to remove this threat from people that fear you is to exterminate every last one of them. But then who would make your Nike shoes?

      Fourthly - people who share your world view are the problem, on both sides. Does Osama not talk about making American's fear him and Al Queda?

    10. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck modded this "insightful"? It's the best example of American arrogance and ignorance I've seen in a long, long time, not to mention that it has nothing to do with the subject of the article. Way to go, moderators...

    11. Re:My gripe with Enterprise by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shit, it's right-wing propaganda filled BS rants like that that almost make me root for Osama.....

      As a Canadian, thanks for your help on D-Day. And Dieppe...oh, wait....I'm sure the Eurpoeans are so glad you waited almost 3 years and until the JAPANESE attacked you before you decided to enter the war on the side of 'democracy'...Oh and thanks for arming the Mujahadeen in the first place...great forsight there from Ronald Reagan and, oh my, Donald Rumsfeld!

      As for your timeline damning the Clinton administration I think you need to have your memory cleared up a bit. The 9/11 attack hade been in the planning for YEARS before the Cole. They were two separate attacks carried out by two separate cells of Al Queda. There was no "first the Cole and if it works, World Trade Center!". Even if the US had massively retaliated in response to the Cole, 9/11 would still have happened, perhaps sooner and with more planes. As for the embassies, I seem to remember a few cruise missles being lobbed at Afghanistan in an effort to get OBL for that and then the Republicans and Neo-Cons jumping up and down, claiming Clinton was just doing it to divert attention away from the Lewinski scandal. So when Clinton did try to do something, your ilk, who are NOW suddenly bloodthirsty looking for revenge and willing to fight, stopped him. Gee maybe if you guys had let him lob a few more cruise missle maybe there wouldn't have been a 9/11. Then there's the warnings of an attack your current President ignored. There's plenty of blame for 9/11 to go around in the US so I wouldn't be so quick to start that arguement if I were you.

      You know why Europe and Canada were not attacked on September 11, 2001? Because they didn't act like bullies and piss anybody off!!!! We have this annoying tendancy to treat people fairly and not make enemies. To paraphrase Sun Tzu, the real Sage General can conquere his enemy WITHOUT fighting. Check this essay out...written by an USian, I might add.

      If you are so sure your course is right, why don't you sign up to go fight in Iraq (or whereever GWB's next target on the Axis of Evil is)? Please, put your money where your mouth is - feel free to send us updates from Paris Island every could of weeks. You sure seem will to put everyone elses ass on the line for your right-wing ideals, I was wondering if you would be willing to put your own there. Or are you just a chickenhawk?

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  140. Singing to the tune of Mary had a little lamb... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's klingons off the starboard bow
    starboard bow
    starboard bow!
    There's klingons off the sarboard bow,
    scrape them off, Jim!

    STAR Treckin'!
    Across the universe!
    Only going forward,
    Cause we can't find reverse! ...there's more, but I can't remember it anymore.

  141. Re:EXCEPT THEY REPLACED THE CAST WITH NEGROES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I hate racial stereotyping, UPNs flagship shows have been typicaly targeted tward the urban African Americans. The only thing missing are commercials for StoveTop Cornbread. In fact, only BET shows these commercials dispite the fact that cornbread tastes a hell of alot better then their stuffing.

  142. Need IQ or attention span? Forget it. by salvorHardin · · Score: 1

    I only heard that Enterprise might not be renewed a few days ago, and it really wouldn't surprise me if it had been cancelled. With the likes of Crusade, Futurama and Legend of The Rangers, it often seems like only 'lowest common denominator' shows can keep the interest of the big networks. If you like a show which requires an attention span longer than 12 minutes, or - god forbid - 12 IQ points, it's going to have an uncertain future. Don't get too attached to the characters.

  143. How Ratings are measured by mogh1701 · · Score: 0

    I think the how ratings are measured should be changed. Enterprise is one of the most popular bit torrents out there. That is how they should measure the success of a show, how many people download.

    If that was the case Simpsons, 24, and Star Trek would live forever. Fuck shows like American Idol and the Bachelor.

    --

    "Its too hot out for a Penguin to be just walking around. - Billy Madison"

  144. More Good news... by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

    T'Pol and Seven of Nine bikini jello wrestling could save Enterprise.

    --

    --
    What would Bill Clinton do?
  145. -1 offtopic spam trap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  146. Re:-1 offtopic spam trap oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  147. Friday Timeslot by remo713 · · Score: 1

    The Friday showing hasn't hurt Stargate any. I think it largely comes down to content, rather than when a program airs. Enterprise has suffered from a bit of half-heartedness and more than a bit of political correctness. This was supposed to be pre-Kirk times, so bring on the running gun battles! The galaxy was less a friendly place back then!

  148. Getting Better? by solarlux · · Score: 1

    I watched the first two seasons of Enterprise and enjoyed reading the well-written reviews by Gisele La Roche. Interestingly, he's given Season 3 some pretty good marks. Already, he's given:

    A+ (5 episodes)
    A (4 episodes)

    Compare this with Season 1:

    A+ (0 episodes)
    A (2 episodes)

    And Season 2:

    A+ (0 episodes)
    A (2 episodes)

    I enjoyed the 4 "A" episodes in the first two seasons, so I'm eager to see the season 3 episodes which prompted the "A+" ratings.

  149. Good Storyline... bad time of the week..... by wilsonjo · · Score: 1
    <2 cents>
    The current story line has been really good, I really enjoyed the past few episodes and have actually been waiting each week for the next episode to come out.

    The only bad thing is I'm a huge Stargate Fan, and this is the last season of SG1, so now I better get the Tivo fired up if they are in the same time slots.

    Basically, I am glad they renewed the show, and I hope they keep up the good story lines...
    </2 cents>
    1. Re:Good Storyline... bad time of the week..... by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      PSST, just download the SG eps off bit torrent, they come out a good 3-4 days before they air in the US. ;-)

  150. Re:Good news... man... by zonker · · Score: 0

    fuckin' fascists... ;p

  151. Re:StarGate SG-1 puts any StarTrek to complete sha by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    You have to be kidding. SG-1 episodes can be SOOOOOO repetitious. (SG-1 goes to planet, brings back artifact, artifact threatens world, SG-1 gets rid of it, world is saved.) I'm sure patriotic Nazis who thinks the US Armed Forces can-do-no-wrong must eat this show up, but SG-1 is not a warm, psychological blankie for me.

    Season 6? You're in for a disappointment. Parker Lewis (Corin Nemec) can't fill Dr. Jackson's shoes.

    Don't get me wrong, I think SG-1 is good sci-fi. But it doesn't beat ST:TOS, ST:TNG (season 3+), or ST:DS9 (season 2+). (Well, maybe ST:TNG...)

    I'd rather force ST writers to watch Farscape or (hee hee) Lexx.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  152. Time and channel do not matter by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

    Time and channel do not matter, when you have a TiVo. ;^)

  153. Yes! by hummassa · · Score: 1

    A lesbian hologram with Nurse Chapel and her 150-yo counterpart, Lwaxana Troi!!!

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  154. All they need is a little respect to the viewer... by spectro · · Score: 1

    On their first season I was warming up the idea of following the series until they ended it with that stupid cliff-hanger. I was so pissed off I completely skipped season two and part of season 3. I just got back to it thanks to a site with .torrents of all previous episodes.

    I don't know about you guys but I hate when they try to pull your leg with cliff-hangers and all these popup-like annoying techniques.

    Hopely the story will have and ending this season since they expected the show to be cancelled.

    --
    HTML is obsolete. It's time for a new, simpler and richer markup language.
  155. Yes. by hummassa · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is why only one other person knows what means "toteo sabetendo unforgiven never shines as the sun butt but I can shine as the bright white on black leather and blue velvet in the kitchen of the house of the Rose Lords that keeps Kathleen Turner, Cybill Shepard, Gillian Anderson, Natalie Portman, Jessica Alba and Jolene Blalock in my bed tonight".

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  156. Hah! by Solokron · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, as soon as we all saw that intro we knew we were all in for a bumpy ride.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  157. Clay Aiken!!! by simetra · · Score: 2, Funny
    Measure of a Man (TNG - Individual Rights)


    I KNEW Clay Aiken was a Trekkie!!!!!!

    That would explain his apparent asexuality and lack of biceps.


    Thanks, I'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your waitress.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  158. Tivo? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the Target Audience also be the largest set of Tivo-type device users?

    Of course, that also kind of shoots the advertising in the head...

  159. I would flame you by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    But what's the point? Nielsen confirms: SF is dying.

    The networks know that the "Star Trek demographic" will watch anything remotely Trekish or science/spec fictional. So why go to all the trouble of doing decent hard science fiction i.e. using a consistent set of rules with no Deus Ex Machines, or even decent drama, like B5 or some of the more daring DS9 plots.

    It's too much trouble. It's too risky. They know we'll watch it anyway. The target market they have to win is Joe Sixpack, and Joe doesn't like to feel like he's missing something. So just pad it with Plasma Discombubulators, Tachyon Defragglers and sprinkle liberally with large breasted aliens and sub soft core teasers (c.f. Enterprise pilot), and remember: Keep It Simple, Stupid.

    With Farscape and Stargate gone, we're pretty much out of self aware shows. Berman and Brago toughed it out by never compromising their one overriding principle - give Joe what he wants - and now they're the only game on the block. Scient Fiction is dead. Long live Emo Fiction.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  160. Stupid time travel storyline by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    I hope they finish/kill the stupid temporal cold war story line. Friday nights will kill the show for good though.

  161. Re:All they need is a little respect to the viewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just got back to it thanks to a site with .torrents of all previous episodes.

    Where at? I have had terrible luck with Limewire.

  162. What else are you gonna do on a Friday night? by weiyuent · · Score: 1

    It looks like 'Enterprise' might be moved to Fridays next year.

    Perfect. Finally geeks can claim with some credibility that they've got a reason for staying in on a Friday night.

  163. I'm dissapointed w.r.t. Malcolm and Hayes by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, there was some SERIOUS sexual tension there. If one (or both) of them had been a woman, there would have been a sex scene by now.

    Am I gay? Does it matter? It's just clear that those two ARE and I feel bad for them. It's what, 2200? We'd have been doing gay marriages for 200 years by then. Besides, it's a ship. They've been serving hot buttered buns on naval ships for hundreds of years.

    Luckily, I've got karma to burn on this post.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  164. Re: Your sig by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    People who pirate music, movies, and software are freeloaders who get bitter when the free ride is taken away.

    I thought that said "...who get bittorrent..." Of course, I'm currently "pirating" Fedora Core 2, and having to do so over http because nobody on the torrent is sharing. >:-O

    To stay on topic, though, kudos to UPN for keeping on what has turned out to be a decent program (I have watched each episode from the beginning, and was amazed with the quality the show has attained this season). B&B need to be fired, though. From a cannon, preferably.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  165. Backin on UP! by Lotharjade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!
    Don't forget backing up to the kiss of death fridays.

    I think that wouldn't be so bad if they used an airing system like ADULTSWIM on cartoon network. They run a show three times a night and their timing lets them catch all the night owls. If UPN replayed the show say at 1am and 3am they would catch everyone coming in from a night of fun. Drunks like scifi too!

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
    1. Re:Backin on UP! by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      Adult Swim runs the entire block twice(once from eleven to two, repeated from two till five).

      And it does indeed help not missing shows... though they aren't on fridays.

      *honk*

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    2. Re:Backin on UP! by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

      I still think they have caught on to something. Notice that both Futurama and Family Guy (previously canceled) are now being picked up again by FOX. This apparently due to cartoon network getting it to a larger and different crowd. Running twice a night at different time periods helps get a wider audience and may be more convienient for people. I suggest running at 8pm and 2am.

      That and don't run it on fridays.

      --
      Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  166. changes in shows by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    You know every show of Trek is a different flavor. Your not going to like all the flavors all the time.

    If you don't like the current flavor, the best way to get what you want is to write down what you want in a flavor (show) and send it to the Trek empire, Trek fan groups, and possibly your own website. That way the next incarnation may be pleasing to the pallete, OR the current show my have a flavor change (Much like the change in DS9 when they changed production companies in '96 (if I recall))

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  167. Well, good! by penginkun · · Score: 1

    One of the great things about this season (at least the last half dozen eps or so) has been the sense of continuity. One episode leads into the next, and yet there is an episodic feel to things. It's almost as if they've been studying Babylon 5...

    Of course, they're just going to go back to the disjointed episodic system after this season is over, but as someone else said, it's better than nothing.

    I'm not worried about the show moving to Friday night. X-Files got a huge boost from Friday night, and it might be just what Enterprise needs to get its numbers up.

  168. And don't forget... by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    The year it moved to 10 was also the last year the Nielsen ratings didn't adjust for demographics but just reported on "total viewership". Had it gotten the exact same rating only a season later, it would've been one of the biggest ratings hits ever.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  169. Two things UPN needs to do now... by TheABomb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    to no longer be the "Unwatchable Programmes Network":

    1. Let (read: force) LeVar Burton direct as many episodes as his schedule will allow, and

    2. Get Wil Wheaton to guest-star.

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
    1. Re:Two things UPN needs to do now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wil Wheaton? I've seen him guest-hosting on Tech TV. That's enough for me.

  170. Re:Enterprise will be back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the matter? Pissed that your precious Farscape got cancelled? :p

  171. open source star trek by Pandemis · · Score: 1

    the entire Star Trek francise should be GPL'd. Do the same for any number of other essentially good -but cancelled- science fiction that didn't survive the for-profit entertainment model.

    Thesis in summary: GPL sci-fi: distributed script writing and video production present new opportunities for old sci-fi series.

    related links:
    freefilm.sourceforge.net www.freescriptexchange.com

    note to self: distributed video production will present interesting continuity challenges.

    --
    Committee for Symmetric Distribution of the Future
  172. Re:Singing to the tune of Mary had a little lamb.. by Hassman · · Score: 1

    It's life Jim,
    but not as we know it,
    not as we know it,
    not as we know it...

    Scotty has a verse too, but I can't remember it.

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  173. Somebody start www.firerickberman.com !!!!! by Unworthy+Advocate · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, somebody do it all ready. Take action people. The future of all TrekDom is in your hands!!!

  174. Enterprise on Friday? At least it's on-air. by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
    Thankfully I have a PVR, so I don't care when it airs. What annoys me is that everything that does move to Friday gets the axe. For example, the "Game Over" rendered show was interesting (good idea to expose it to Trek fans on a Wednesday), but it moved to Fridays, and then off after just a few episodes.

    To be honest, are there any other shows on UPN other than soap-opera for nerds and soap-opera for rednecks?

  175. Time/date is irrelevant. by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've got Tivo and so should everyone else.

    They could run it at 4am Monday morning and it wouldn't make a bit of difference to me. I wish more networks would figure that out. Heck, Hallmark is showing Magnum PI at 1 and 2am. Fine with me. In fact, that's better than a prime time slot because it doesn't interfere with anything else I may want to watch.

  176. Berman and Braga, Berman and Braga by unsigned+integer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see this over and over, again and again in these posts.

    Can anyone provide some factual, documented, examples of why these two are the BANE of the ST universe?

  177. Re:Let Trek Die With What Dignity It Still HAs Lef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, they were given enough chances, put them out of their misery!

  178. Imagine a schedule filled with shows like... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ..."The Mullets"...

    Hmmm...

    Actually, I can say that "The Mullets" is infinitely more entertaining then the sickening rash of do nothing, provide nothing garbage that is "Reality" Television, minus the actually decent ones like "Trading Spaces". (The shows you can actually learn a thing or two from...)

    The rest, like "American Idol" and its ilk can be wrapped up in 100 year old newspapers, doused with as many flammable liquids as exist and then have a liberal application of flaming napalm applied to them...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  179. Why I stopped watching... by neutralstone · · Score: 1

    It was an episode in the first season. The ship's token Vulcan sent an encrypted private message to her parents. The human crew found it suspicious that the message was encrypted, so one of the officers "just" decrypted it.

    Drink that in. Puny humans flick a switch and break strong encryption created by Vulcans.

    Ok, so let's go on the assumption that all encryption is weak in the future. Suppose they have computers that break all kinds of inconvenient laws of physics in order to nullify the effects of all public key-style encryption. And suppose that the all-logical ('cept on those rare Pam Far days) Vulcans, in spite of this awareness, do not opt to use one-time pads for secure communication.

    ...

    Yeah. Doesn't work. I know it's just a show, but it's not like MST3K: they're trying to be serious. It irked me. I stopped watching, anticipating more crap like that.

  180. ST:Enterprise is too militaristic by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    This series is too militaristic. The writers are reacting to the Saudi Arabian massacre of Sept.11 (heard of it? check the web if not) by imposing a Gulf War II-type of ambiance onto a series that takes place hundreds of years in the future.

    It leaves a metal taste in my mouth.

    People simply aren't going to think and act this way in the future.

    The writers should take the actors and plots and move them to a contemporary Gulf war setting if they want to celebrate techno-warrior jingoism. They would get all the ratings boost that they need to keep going forever.

    The ST:Enterprise writers should read some real modern science-fiction and stop feeding us all this John Wayne-meets-Star Wars stuff. Because, to tell the truth, they don't really do it as well as John Wayne (check out some of his 1950's movies on DVD if your not familiar with his persona) and George Lucas.

    It wouldn't hurt (except the ratings) to lighten up on the rubber mask characters and the contrived sexual tension between the crew members. In two hundred years, people will either just anomomously fuck, take anti-Viagra pills, use virtual-reality porn, or bring their families with them on long space voyages. Plus ca change, plus ca meme chose

    Please reply with tips for getting those funny accented characters from obscure European legacy languages into Slashdot messages. Thanks.

  181. I want ROMULANS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody does. The hell with Xindi! What's that, Xindi?

  182. Andromeda hasn't been cancelled by hellfire · · Score: 1

    It got picked up by Sci-Fi and new episodes have been running. It's no longer in syndication, and Andromeda I believe is only running friday nights on Sci-fi, but since this is a cable channel, it works out better as you don't have to have such a huge share.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  183. A Geek with a TV with no mute button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh?

  184. Re:Singing to the tune of Mary had a little lamb.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can not change the laws of physics
    laws of physics
    laws of physics
    You can not change the laws of physics
    laws of physics jim!

    Listen for your self

  185. Re:StarGate SG-1 puts any StarTrek to complete sha by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    OK...season 6 is done and gone. Michael Shanks came back and Corin left to do broadway? After a while he kinda grew on you. It was a great part specificly because it forced the writers to really WORK at it. You must be still watching syndication....Season 8 starts in the fall...It's gonna be the final season...an REALLY cool!!!

  186. Deja Vu all over again from an old guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Original Series was moved to Friday after a campaign to save it, and Friday is where the execs sent it to die. UPN could be doing the same thing. If the show does really well in the ratings for a Friday they may save it, but if the ratings are bad they will justify that in killing it.

    Also, I don't watch it, and I wish Rick Berman would be replaced.

  187. From a UK perspective... by DuncMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In my humble opinion, this is terrific news (if true). I love the show. I'm relieved that they haven't betrayed an interesting concept (like Voyager did after, oh, 5 episodes or so), but this self-contained Xindi/ Expanse season has allowed them to be more daring with tighter stories. And there's been some real character development and plausible ethical dilemmas.

    And no, it hasn't contradicted Star Trek continuity- not that that really matters much.

    I don't have any viewing figures to quote but I suspect that Enterprise is pretty popular here in the UK. Sky (satellite TV) shows it on Monday evenings at 8:00pm, repeated on Saturday at 3:00pm and Sunday at 7:00pm. Channel 4 (terrestrial TV) shows seasons several months later on Sunday afternoons as part of a string of programmes targetting teenagers, repeated (uncut) very late on a weeknight (TiVo!). Those sound like good time slots to me.

    So, there may be vocal people in the USA who dislike Enterprise and it may be losing in ratings to reality TV and sitcoms (who would have thought that the Lowest Common Denominator would be so low and so common?), but that's not even close to the whole story.

    We're lucky to have Enterprise on TV. If you want schedules to consist solely of Queer Eye For The World's Wackiest Survivor Idol Friends then carry on ignoring and/ or criticising Enterprise.

  188. Re:I went looking for FireFly fans by ispinstr · · Score: 1

    *Rant on*
    Well, let's see...could it be... fireflyfans.net? Not obvious enough for ya?

    Oh wait, that was sarcasm wasn't it? hmmm... Trying to suggest that there are no firefly fans? I guess Universal's making that $50M Firefly movie for no one?

    Don't try to lay the cancellation on the lack of fans. I think we've proved that we are many through the DVD set sales. A combination of Friday nights, no promotion, and airing the pilot as the final episode was why the viewership suffered.
    *Rant off*

  189. Did you even watch the show? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Orbiting one planet permanently should've been an opportunity to experiment with some continuity."

    Did you even watch the show? The station DS9 was not really located within sight of Bajor, let alone orbiting it. It was a deep space station, after all.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Did you even watch the show? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Did you even watch the show? The station DS9 was not really located within sight of Bajor, let alone orbiting it. It was a deep space station, after all.

      Nope. According to the show, it was originally built (by cardassians) to orbit planet Bajor, and transport between the surface and other systems was the main function.

      Later on, the federation moved it from the planet to the wormhole. However, it was still inside that star-system, and thus not really "Deep Space". (The Federation apparently considered Bajor far enough from their territory that the whole system was "deep space", because they gave it that name while the station was still at the planet)

      Of course, the producers were never really sensible with interplanetary distances, so everything fluctuated as needed by any particular episode.

  190. I'm sorry, but enterprise blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enterprise is bad for the same reason Voyager and DS9 were bad- the writing. We haven't seen even decent writing since TNG.

    Yes, I'm a geek. yes I've seen every TNG episode like 100 times. But why is it so many geeks have such bad taste in SCI-FI? If you fight to save shitty shows then all SCF-FI gets is shitty shows.

    What am I saying? Scifi fans are killing sci-fi.

    I'm right cause I'm on of those rare geeks with taste. God, stop watching it already.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but enterprise blows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking self-important, elitist, prude. Shut the fuck up. Who're you to dictate good taste?

  191. Re:Good news... (check out Firefly ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you're interested in good story lines.

    for my money the best site is http://www.fireflyfans.net. Check around and you can find links to where all of the shows are available for download.

    Enjoy

  192. The newer the series, the less interested I am? by slasher999 · · Score: 1

    It seems that I never care for a new ST series when it is on first run. In addition, it seems that the newer the series, the less I like it. I love TOS and TNG, althought I only got into TNG a couple of years ago. I've caught a couple DS9 episodes lately since SciFi has been running them a lot and I've found those somewhat interesting, although I again found the show all but unwatchable when it was in first run. I started watching Voyager when it came on, but lost interest (sorry to say I ended up hooked on Melrose Place instead - ugh) very quickly. I managed to watch two episodes of Enterprise. The first episode was ok, but like everyone else I kept wondering why he didn't leap after saving the Klingon. Just couldn't get that out of my head. The second episode I saw was brutal, and that was it for Enterprise for me.

    1. Re:The newer the series, the less interested I am? by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      To really appreciate Deep Space Nine you have to watch the entire series in order. Some of the episodes, especially towards the end, don't make much sense on their own if you don't know the backstory.

      Personally, after having watched the entire series in order, it is one of my favourite Treks.

      I think Enterprise is coming into it's own and I am happy to hear it is going to get at least one more season. After all, The Next Generation took a few seasons to really get going as well. ;)

  193. Those who would revel the end of ST:E by Vexar · · Score: 1
    The underlying theme here is that the networks still believe there's a market for Sci-Fi, and maybe they just need to push the envelope a bit harder than "oh crap, our ratings, how they dwindle! Make the hot chick wear less, and let's bring out the Borg, that always packs 'em in."

    Here's a better idea. Quit coming up with bottom-feeder narratives. As long as Paramount owns Star Trek, and as long as Paramount is a company in the business of making tv shows, that is all we will see, more of their formula. Until a network decides "whoa, take a chance on this," we are left with lowest common denominator pieces that fit the largest demographic. Budgets unleashed only make for eye candy, like the computer graphics festivals, and great props. They don't make for meaningful stories.

    In short, they are "in power" so why create anything revolutionary? This is the wrong kind of conservatism. Its the "low fiscal risk" conservatism.

    Here are some ideas which won't fly well with the Paramount executives:

    • Kill off main characters and NEVER bring them back, no matter how far-fetched and witty your approach may be. Show people as they adjust to loss, and have that actually last a few episodes.
    • Borrow heavily from the 'risky science' budget at NASA and actually put some of those off-the-wall concepts/realities like antimatter into common knowledge.
    • Show a downward spiral in someone's character, and how people react to it.
    • Explore and expose real, heart-kind evil.
    • Show amazing heart-kind love.
    • Carry on a dialogue which demonstrates something less than perfect communication.
    • Explore more than the command crew social circle, regularly.
    To their credit, it was nice to see the Enterprise limp along for an episode after it received heavy damage. I particularly liked it when they had to participate in some colony fighting to get their rare minerals. The Voyager episode with Janeway wandering into what amounted to crewmen in "steerage" was unforgettable.
  194. Re:Singing to the tune of Mary had a little lamb.. by jnicholson · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you're referring to

    STAR TREKKIN'

    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    On the Starship Enterprise, under Captain Kirk.
    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    Boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.

    Lt. Uhura, report!

    Uhura: There's Klingons on the starboard bow,
    starboard bow, starboard bow.
    There's Klingons on the starboard bow,
    starboard bow, Jim.

    Analysis, Mr. Spock!

    Spock: It's life, Jim, but not as we know it,
    not as we know it, not as we know it.
    It's life, Jim, but not as we know it,
    not as we know it, Captain.

    Medical update, Doctor McCoy!

    McCoy: It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
    Dead, Jim. Dead, Jim.
    It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
    Dead, Jim, Dead.

    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    On the Starship Enterprise, under Captain Kirk.
    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    Boldly going forward, still can't find reverse.

    Starship Captain, James T. Kirk!

    Kirk: Ha-ha! We come in peace, shoot to kill,
    shoot to kill, shoot to kill.
    We come in peace, shoot to kill,
    Scotty, beam me up!

    Engineer, Mister Scott!

    Scotty: Ye canna change the laws of physics,
    laws of physics, laws of physics!
    Ye canna change the laws of physics,
    laws of physics, yet

    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    On the Starship Enterprise, under Captain Kirk!
    Star Trekking, across the universe,
    Boldly going forward, and things are getting worse!

    Many versions seem to be floating around, some much longer...

    --
    "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
    -- Nick Davies
  195. other things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When its core audience was out doing other things, the sort of things young people, young adults, do

    You mean like sitting in their parents basement going blind looking at thehun.net?

    You obviously dont know the 'core audience' of ST!

  196. Hercules vs Quantum Leap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have problems with Herc., I have problems with that goofy Quantum Leap guy, the 5ft british jockey and the rest of the melrose place crew.

    zak

  197. Friday, the day nobody watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Friday night is traditionally the babysitter night, because adults, teens and young adults worth anything will have figured out SOMETHING ELSE TO DO and gone out for the evening rather than staying at home watching TV all night.

    Those left behind at home are the kids and their babysitters, hence the plethora of harmless sitcoms ABC has been running for years.

    This is mostly the same for Saturday night too. If you're home on Saturday night, you just didn't try hard enough to find something else to do.

    Either way, it means the target audience for stuff like Star Trek or anything with a fantasy theme is simply not home to see it, which automatically means the show will get low ratings and get killed.

  198. I want to watch Star Trek by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    the "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" philosophy does apply. Why cancel it when you can just not watch it?

    Because I want to watch Star Trek. Not that crap that uses familiar words from the trek franchise, I want to watch Star Trek.

    I want to watch a show about a future techno utopia where a united humanity ventures forth to the stars in a spirit of friendly exploration.

    I don't want to watch "the search for weapons of mass destruction...in space!". And as long as that shit is there, maskarading as Star Trek, I won't get to watch new trek. I want it canceled because it is killing star trek, I want that cancer removed before the entire organism (ie, franchise) is dead.

    I'm not saying I don't want you to get CG work on lame shows, or that people who enjoy shows about sexy people rubbing each other down with space goo shouldn't get to watch them. I would gladly simply not watch it if it were some random crappy show. But its a parasite sucking the blood out of something I loved, and that is why I hate it instead of simply ignoring it.

    Rick Berman must die so that trek will live again.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  199. I stand corrected by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I stand corrected. See topic!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  200. Re:Good news... (check out Firefly ... by Neo+Sharkey · · Score: 1

    >Check around and you can find links to where all
    >of the shows are available for download.

    Actually, you should BUY the entire Firefly series, the boxset is already out and well worth the $35.

    Remember, vote with your money. If you download crap (i.e. current pop music, fine). But try to support good Sci-Fi.

    Perhaps if the pointy haired execs see that the Friends DVD is outsold by Firefly and TNG box sets, they may get a clue.

  201. Friday... Schmiday... It's called TiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution to TV Scheduling is called TiVo!