Slashdot Mirror


U2 Threatens to Release Album Early on iTunes

Uninvited Guest writes "After a rough cut of U2's latest unfinished album was stolen earlier this week, the band has vowed to release the entire album on iTunes if the music appears on P2P networks. Bono told the London Daily Telegraph, 'If it is on the Internet this week, we will release it immediately as a legal download on iTunes, and get hard copies into the shops by the end of the month.' Is this the exact opposite of the Smashing Pumpkins' last album, which the band rushed to release on P2P networks, before it could hit the stores?"

572 comments

  1. sooo? by the_argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it's available for free on P2P networks, we'll make it available for people to buy online?

    Just don't get that.........

    1. Re:sooo? by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Presumably, the "real fans" will then buy it on iTunes rather than getting it from their favourite P2P program.

    2. Re:sooo? by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If it's available both legally and illegally, fans will be faced with the same old choice. History tells us that a good number still choose to buy.

      However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law. Having acquired the music, the fan will be less likely to pay for it when it is released legally.

      Once you understand that this is not meant for the people who never would've paid for it, the logic becomes quite simple.

    3. Re:sooo? by MisanthropicProgram · · Score: 1
      A rough cut of the disk disappeared from a recording studio in Nice during a photo shoot. The band was putting together the finishing touches.

      The download probably won't be as good as the finished product. Then again, the finishing touches are probably a bunch of layered vocals, guitars, and whatnot, so the advance copy would sound more like a live version, no?

    4. Re:sooo? by EvilAlien · · Score: 4, Funny

      There won't be any "real fans" until U2 has a chance to overhype and overplay their songs in conjunction with movie soundtracks.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    5. Re:sooo? by Flower · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because then fans can support the band by buying the music instead of committing copyright infringement.

      Sometimes things really are that simple.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    6. Re:sooo? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      It's probably so people don't have to spend their time and energy searching for it on P2P networks. Also, they might advertise that it's safer (not to mention legal) to get it through iTunes instead as the files you're downloading through P2P networks might be of poorer quality, be a virus or something else rather than the actual song, etc.

      As for the hard copy version, the plus is that it'll definitely be of higher quality since it won't be of a lossy format.

    7. Re:sooo? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What choice do they have if it gets to P2P before any other channel? If they didn't release it on iTunes the ONLY way to get it would be illegally through P2P. Many people that would have just bought the album (given no other choice) would take that route. On the other hand if they release it on iTunes you capture part of that DL market. They were obviously already going to release it on iTunes at a later date, so there's no compromise of distributor deals, etc.

      In other words you can either compete with the black market, or just roll over and play dead. U2 has decided to compete.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:sooo? by BlueCup · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's sad is it's the "real" fans that are going to be hurt by this. The fans that care enough about only hearing the finished product... to me this is like U2 pissing on their fans, all in the interest of making a few extra bucks.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    9. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      what's sad is you.

      "real" U2 fans would love to be pissed on by Bono.

    10. Re:sooo? by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I thought that with iTunes 4.6 the itms purchased music all was in that newfangled looslessformat.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    11. Re:sooo? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      that depends heavily on how they're doing a mixdown. for all we know, it could just have a drum track and rhthm guitar. or it could be nearly completed, with just some leveling to adjust. me? i don't like U2, so it matters to me not one jot nor tittle.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    12. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No chance but to break the law? Are you serious. How about exercising the slightest bit of self-restraint and waiting another 2 weeks. Oh I forgot, there is nothing we shouldn't have for free and damnit we deserve it right? I feel sorry for you.

    13. Re:sooo? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Uh, how?

      Unless they sell the real CD below the price of iTunes normal $9.99 per album price... and the fans win either way?

    14. Re:sooo? by Wog · · Score: 1

      I guess that makes sense, but what's with them "threatens"? I don't get it at all.

      'Don't steal it, or we'll be forced to... uhm... push a money-making product out so it can be sold earlier.'

      Wouldn't 'promises' be a better word? Or am I missing the point entirely?

    15. Re:sooo? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I suppose I should've been more clear. Assuming this CD isn't ready to be released, and doesn't have everything finished, the tracks assumably would be of a lower quality than the ones that would be otherwise released in November. So by releasing the CD now, these tracks never reach their ultimate potential, and the customers that were willing to wait until November for the best quality possible will not now have that opportunity.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    16. Re:sooo? by k_killmore · · Score: 1


      However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law.

      Uh, how about the choice to wait until the album comes out finished and legally? The idea that there's no choice in this is absurd.

      I'm a fan of the stuff in your house, but if you only make it available to me by leaving your door unlocked I have no choice but to break the law.

    17. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you blame the thieves rather than the band? Oh that's right, the slashdot crowd supports intellectual property theft.

    18. Re:sooo? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "If it's available for free on P2P networks, we'll make it available for people to buy online? Just don't get that..."

      What's not to get? There's demand for their album, right? But there's no supply. When people want something, but they can't get it legitimately, some will go towards the less-than-legit form of acuisition. But, if they supply it, they'll get sales because that demand is definitely there. Frankly, if I were a fan of U2, I'd just go the iTunes route. I'd get it quicker, plus guaranteed quality. I imagine others would feel the same way. Let iTunes be the first stop shop and 'free music' isn't so interesting.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:sooo? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      What? I didn't say anything about condoning the theft of the CD. I think most people will agree that this was an unfourtanate thing to happen to this band. However, if my house gets robbed, I don't go over to my neighbors house and beat him to death with a rake. I think U2 is punishing the wrong people.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    20. Re:sooo? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " How about exercising the slightest bit of self-restraint and waiting another 2 weeks. Oh I forgot, there is nothing we shouldn't have for free and damnit we deserve it right? I feel sorry for you."

      If the majority of people really felt the way you have caricaturized them, then the content industry would not be thriving. I feel sorry for you for feeling so cynical about how people really are. Gloomy.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some people it's more important to be morally right than lawful. If they have the choice to buy or copy "illegaly" they'll buy because copying would be morally wrong. But if their only choice is to copy "illegaly" they convince themselves that, since it's the only choice, they're not doing anything morally wrong even if it's illegal.

      -hadohk

    22. Re:sooo? by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You imply that U2 has never had a good album without the machine. I would definitly not agree with that. The Joshua Tree is one of the top albums of all time.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    23. Re:sooo? by purplepaste · · Score: 1

      The article isn't entirely clear on this point, but it sounds like the band would release the album in it's current, not quite finished state, rather than continue to polish it up.

      Which would be unfortunate for the fans and the band, considering how long it's been since they've put an album out.

    24. Re:sooo? by Daleks · · Score: 4, Funny

      to me this is like U2 pissing on their fans, all in the interest of making a few extra bucks.

      They've done it before. You've heard their album Pop, haven't you?

    25. Re:sooo? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Ultimate potential means being over produced, doesn't it? Where there's the possibility that a rawer sound will give listeners much more enjoyment from hearing the music as it was played, or closer to it.

    26. Re:sooo? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > The Joshua Tree is one of the top albums of all time.

      And the last decent album U2 ever made.
      I vauguely remember something called Rattle and Hum.. and didn't bother to keep track after that.

    27. Re:sooo? by d474 · · Score: 1
      but what's with them "threatens"? I don't get it at all.
      "Threatens" works. Them's fightin' words!

      Vision this:
      Some evil P2P CD pirate is shaking in his pirate boots....if he distributes the CD illegally, then, why, U2 will release their album early!!! The threat is just to much for him to handle. Bono never bluffs. He backs down and tosses the CD in the trash. "That damn Bono! Always one step ahead of me. Curses! Foiled again!!

      I agree, I don't get it either.
      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    28. Re:sooo? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Seeing how most of their work from the last 15 years is over polished, it might actually make for a possibly not entirely uninteresting album..

    29. Re:sooo? by name773 · · Score: 1

      you got the point, just in the wrong spot.
      the ac you replied to said that the way to get it without breaking the law is to wait two weeks, and the cynical comment was to put a bad light on fans who think it's the right thing to download it early, because that's the only available copy.

    30. Re:sooo? by name773 · · Score: 1

      yeah, if anything, they should polish the cd and add two bonus tracks for those who choose to pay for the music. gives people who would normally download more incentive to wait for the real thing (until someone rips it :) )

    31. Re:sooo? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "and the cynical comment was to put a bad light on fans who think it's the right thing to download it early, because that's the only available copy."

      Hmm yeah I see your point. I'm still bugged about that. I don't think people are thinking it's right, I think they're thinking "hey, i can finally get it." Yeah, maybe they're not in the right mind set, being a bit ignorant I suppose. Is it an excuse? Not really. But the problem with piracy on a large scale has little to do with people tyring to get something for nothing, it's about who provides the best service.

      Sorry to bug ya about it. Just venting a bit in between long file saves here. ;)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    32. Re:sooo? by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      No, stuff sold in the iTMS is still 128kbps AAC.

    33. Re:sooo? by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hmm, you forget:
      Achtung baby, 1991 #10 on rolling stone readers alltime best albums list 2002, #62 on the editors top top 500 alltime albums
      All that you can't leave behind, 2000 #16, #139
      Zooropa, 1993 #70, -

      All that you can't leave behind is probably too high on the reader list due to the proximity between release and poll time but the other two definitly earned their spots.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    34. Re:sooo? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, and if I go for what such polls say I'd be listening to a lot more crap then I do.

      I suggest listening with your ears (and brain), not with your eyes..

      Or in other words, such lists can be very nice for suggestions, but wont tell you what is good or not. Add to that the fact that most people don't have a clue about the difference between good/bad music and like/dislike.

    35. Re:sooo? by torokun · · Score: 1

      Right. If someone wants to do something, and the only way they can do it is illegal, they have no choice but to break the law?

      Rethink that and call me in the morning.

    36. Re:sooo? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      No chance but to break the law? Are you serious. How about exercising the slightest bit of self-restraint and waiting another 2 weeks.

      The album was scheduled for release in November. Not in two weeks. If they hadn't changed that, the choice would be P2P now or wait 4 months. (Not that I personally care much either way, but we're a talking of fans.) They could probbaly just ignore it, but making this response gets them a nice burst of publicity and digital chic.

    37. Re:sooo? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the editors of Rolling Stone and the studio engineers who also participated in the top 500 list have no idea what good music is.
      /sarcasm

      Just because you don't happen to like the same music doesn't mean they are wrong. Personally I don't like half the top 100 but so what? I never understood the fascination with Elvis other than him being the first popular rock and roll artist, yet I understand that his music is generally considered to be some of the best of all time and with so many people saying so I guess I must just not get it. Btw I have about as diverse musical preferences as you can get, it's not unusual for me to go to a heavy metal concert and a classical orchestral concert on back to back nights =) I didn't simply pull those numbers because they were numbers, rather I used them to show that U2 has done something at least worthy of praise since the Joshua Tree.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    38. Re:sooo? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      the files you're downloading through P2P networks might be of poorer quality, be a virus or something else rather than the actual song, etc.

      There's no such thing as an MP3 virus. Some pathological files mught crash your player, but that's it. Unless you're foolish enough to download "U2-new-album.MP3.exe" and click on it.

    39. Re:sooo? by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      That was my point. Someone might unknowingly/accidentally download an executable file (virus, trojan, backdoor program, whatever...) instead of the actual song if they didn't know what they were doing.

    40. Re:sooo? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > Yeah, the editors of Rolling Stone and the studio engineers who also participated in the top 500 list have no idea what good music is.

      Maybe they do, maybe they don't. THe thing is that this is not even about good music, but about music they believe their target public will be interested in.

      > Just because you don't happen to like the same music doesn't mean they are wrong.

      I gave an opinion about music, taste plays a rather important role in that. They have a different opinion, fine.

      Why I responded to your comment is because you happen to have an opinion, well, state it instead of using some magazine as 'proof'.

      > Personally I don't like half the top 100 but so what? I never understood the fascination with Elvis other than him being the first popular rock and roll artist, yet I understand that his music is generally considered to be some of the best of all time and with so many people saying so I guess I must just not get it.

      Thta is the difference between quality and taste.
      Elvis' quality was mostly in performance tho, the quality of the music itself is not that outstanding.

      > Btw I have about as diverse musical preferences as you can get, it's not unusual for me to go to a heavy metal concert and a classical orchestral concert on back to back nights =)

      Same here, and add some techno and opera to it for good measure.

      > I didn't simply pull those numbers because they were numbers, rather I used them to show that U2 has done something at least worthy of praise since the Joshua Tree.

      The numbers distract from your opinion, as if you need someone to tell you what to appreciate, that was my entire issue with them.

      I accept your opinion, but beg to differ.

    41. Re:sooo? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Uh, how about the choice to wait until the album comes out finished and legally? The idea that there's no choice in this is absurd.

      Sorry, I missed a word in the sentence. What I had intended to write was: "if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album right now has no choice but to break the law."

      Yes, you can choose to wait, and that would be a laudable choice. However, I'm pointing out that U2 probably don't feel that they can count on everybody being noble.

    42. Re:sooo? by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [...] no choice but to break the law? Rethink that and call me in the morning.

      Learn to separate a realistic expectation of human nature from condoning such. People break laws all the time, and you've probably broken speed limits several times. If you did, then you probably did it because you wanted to get somewhere more quickly, there was no legal way to do so, and the chances of getting caught and punished are slim.

      I was trying to explain why U2 thought this was a sensible thing to do, because somebody asked. I was trying to predict what would happen, not trying to justify what hasn't even happened. Do you actually disagree that their album sales are likely to be hurt otherwise?

    43. Re:sooo? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that require U2 to still have fans?

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    44. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most real fans probably live in countries where iTunes is not available.

    45. Re:sooo? by exspecto · · Score: 0

      They should hire you on as a consultant. I'm as surprised as you that you don't have an Insightful tag yet.

    46. Re:sooo? by The+Patient · · Score: 1
      "if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law"

      I don't think so. Other choices include waiting to acquire it legally, or eschewing it altogether.

      By the way: if all of the people who felt that they were being ripped off by the record labels (and I think they were, given the large numbers of "one good song and 11 fillers" albums, not to mention the price-fixing scandals) had voted with their wallets and simply refused to buy product, rather than schlepping millions of gigabytes of it around the net in violation of copyright, do you think (a) we'd all be bitching about draconian DRM schemes now, or (b) enjoying lower prices and better quality?

      Yes, that IS the world's longest sentence.

    47. Re:sooo? by name773 · · Score: 1

      a lot of the posts above mine were saying how u2 was going about this the wrong way... i simply flipped it

      but thanks

    48. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I m sure they are not going to play "I shall be released" this year

    49. Re:sooo? by beowulfcluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      U2 songs don't reach their ultimate potential before they've played them live for a while anyway. I have all their albums on cd but I pretty much only listen to live bootlegs and rips from the live dvds since almost everything is better live. I think I'm a so called 'real fan' but I won't feel let down by this as long as there's a live dvd from the coming tours!

    50. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pet Sounds" by The Beach Boys at #2, but "Thriller" by Michael Jackson at #20?

      I trust this list about as far as I can throw a truck...

    51. Re:sooo? by wuice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They've done it before. You've heard their album Pop, haven't you?

      I personally don't consider a band experimenting and dabbling in different musical styles (which is pretty much what U2 has done with every one of their albums) to be pissing on their fans. In fact, I think if anything I would say it's more pandering to release album after album that sounds exactly the same, though that would include some of my favorite bands. Maybe I'm defensive, but I think Pop is a great album. I've always been a big U2 fan, and I'm willing to follow them musically in whatever direction they decide to go, as long as I enjoy the music that comes out of it. So far, I pretty much always have.

      I also don't think it's pissing on your fans to want to have some control over the distribution of your own music, especially when the issue in question is the timing of the album's release, most especially if it's not finished. I think the slashdot backlash to the anti-p2p movement is going way overboard here. I would be very disappointed to hear about U2 trying to drag people into court for downloading their music, and I think the response they are threatening to a situation that they do not want is about as adult and mature a response as one can have. They are admitting that they cannot control what file sharers do, which is something a lot of the music industry has yet to come to grips with, but they are putting their money where their mouth is by saying that the actions of file-sharers will ultimately cause the end product to suffer. I don't think any true U2 fan would like to see that happen, and hopefully whoever stole the unfinished album will feel the same way.

    52. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you understand the recording industry, then it's time to worry.

    53. Re:sooo? by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another U2 album? Sounds like a pretty dire threat to me.

    54. Re:sooo? by bfree · · Score: 1

      No compromise of distributor deals? Are you kidding me? You think that a distirbutor will just go "fine, release on iTunes first, we'll still pay you as much"? U2 are the sort of band that has fans queing to get their hands on new album releases (and here in Ireland anyway you can probably expect lots of record shops to open a at midnight). This is the sort of event that traditional distributors live for, they would not be happy to see it go, I can only imagine Apple are willing to pay the cost so they can have such an event for themselves (I wonder what it will cost them and if they would make any money on the U2 sales).

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    55. Re:sooo? by allgood2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's true, but not exactly U2's fault. Technically speaking, the original album planned for November will NEVER be produced, and that's due to someone stealing it. They could proceed on a normal timeline but everything would be tainted by the theft. Not bad or good, just tainted, sometimes these things can throw artist into hyper-overdrive and what they produce in the aftermath is incredible. Other times, a great big sucking sound of their creative energy gets tied up in the thought of the theft, and whatever is produced afterwards is just halfhearted.

      I come to this from two sides, I downloaded the Lillywhite Session from the Dave Matthews band, and purchased Busted Stuff when it came out. While I fully enjoy the Lillywhite Sessions for what they are, in fact often enjoy them more than I do Busted Stuff, I do also recognize that they are not finish material. For the band to "complete" the album, they had to totally re-envision the songs, and in that since Busted Stuff is good and great to have as a comparison and contrast of what happens when creative vision is derailed.

      I think U2's desire is to get something out that they feel is close to a finish product rather than having an album out for months that isn't near what they wanted the final album to be. For me that's a respectable decision. For their part, they've vowed to work rapidly on the album, canceling vacation plans and other activities so they could finish it at a reasonable production level. Note, I say production level, because it could be months or years, before whatever creative impulses that drove them to do this album return to a level that would be good enough to allow them to proceed "normally."

    56. Re:sooo? by DerWulf · · Score: 1

      I heard 'schlepping' on 'the west wing' once and I figured it means 'exhaustive travel' or some such. Your context seems to indicate differently, could you enlighten me please? Its yiddish isn't it? I figure because in german wie say 'schleppen' for carrying heavy objects ...

      --

      ___
      No power in the 'verse can stop me
    57. Re:sooo? by softwave · · Score: 1

      I've always been a big U2 fan, and I'm willing to follow them musically in whatever direction they decide to go, ...

      Even if they were to release ... let's say... a gregorian chants-inspired, bagpipe-only, country music album? THAT I'd like to see :)

    58. Re:sooo? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Because then fans can support the band by buying the music instead of committing copyright infringement.

      Just as welfare bums can improve their lies by getting off their butts and taking care of themselves. Some do, but the majority find it too easy to steal from those who work. Remember, we humans are just ignoble hairless apes, by and large, and no amount of law or wishing or declaring will change that.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    59. Re:sooo? by grainofsand · · Score: 1

      Agreed completely.

      Although not a U2 fan at all, even the flatest, worst live version of 'Bad' is better than the studio version, for example.

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    60. Re:sooo? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Exactly,

      At some point after the joshua tree U2 turned into a band that plays love songs and I can imagine their only "fan base" is 40 year old housewives who listen to them as they do the dusting.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    61. Re:sooo? by bwy · · Score: 1

      However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law.

      Kinda like the first Star Wars Trilogy on DVD. Lots of folks just don't have VCR's any more and others who have one just can't stand fussing with the streaming magnetic tape- its around for the kids or wife and thats it.

      But, if you want the original trilogy on DVD you'd have to get it off of E-Bay, usually some kind of bad dub from Laser Disc to DVD. For years there have been die hard fans who would love to do nothing more than pay money to their local store to get a prestine copy of the trilogy. But, without that option, you end up buying a bootleg. Lucas may have his "reasons"... but I'm still going to call him a dumb ass on this one.

      Not exactly the same thing as this U2 album bit, but it is the same as your point... underestimating that large group of people who probably only do something illegal when there is no other outlet to obtain the media. Although IMHO in this case the real fans should just wait until the damn album is finished and get it legally.

    62. Re:sooo? by anonymous+cowherd+(m · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the "real fans" download it off p2p and then buy it on CD as well?

      --
      http://neokosmos.blogsome.com
    63. Re:sooo? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "I personally don't consider a band experimenting and dabbling in different musical styles (which is pretty much what U2 has done with every one of their albums)"

      BS, pre-joshua tree was when they built a pretty good fanbase by producing intensely political songs. Joshua Tree saw them break the states, and then they went on extended 'wanking' while they knocked around with BB King...they made it, and proceeded to try and make an 'event' out of everything that had Bono tearing down the Berlin Wall and generally acting like a very downmarket Bob Geldof. Incidentally, learning 3 chord riffs isn't generally considered the best way of entering international politics as anything but a talking head.

      Another aspect is I've yet to see the U2 concept polka album, which would mean their experimentation had moved out of the shallows of accessible pop.

      "Maybe I'm defensive, but I think Pop is a great album."

      Great. Now compare it with Boy, War or the unforgettable fire. There's a difference between the corporate whore and the passionate irish kids. Hell, they really dumped it for me after Bono's 'incarnations', like he was Bowie, or to a stranger extent 'Madonna'.

      Put it this way, they gained a world market at the time when the fans back home were thinking, 'WTF?'.

      I have no problem with your fandom, BTW; I just remember Bono in a tank-top and really bad mullet. It should be pointed out that 'Sunday Bloody Sunday' could have been commercial suicide in the UK when it was released.

      "timing of the album's release, most especially if it's not finished"

      Unless it's a publicity stunt. Hell, I have to ask the question why the CD was even at the photoshoot; the language is certainly loaded to add more fuel to the 'P2P is a method of fencing stolen goods' line. Personally, their last two albums haven't even registered on my radar because the charts are dying on their arse in the UK.

      "They are admitting that they cannot control what file sharers do, which is something a lot of the music industry has yet to come to grips with, but they are putting their money where their mouth is by saying that the actions of file-sharers will ultimately cause the end product to suffer."

      That isn't putting the money where the mouth is. That's putting up flak to defend a *possibly* bad album; you think they wouldn't have slapped it on iTunes?

      Look, the simple fact of the matter is that album sales for the past twenty years have been a case of hiding the fillers in with the good tracks, which usually come out singly for 1/3 the price of a 12-17 track album. The singles market has died because people couldn't be bothered paying that money for something they'll hear in constant rotation ad infinitum for up to two months before release. They saturate, and wonder why nobody buys; elementary marketing.

      "...hopefully whoever stole the unfinished album will feel the same way."

      Ha. Two words. Highest bidder.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    64. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pet Sounds was the culmination of Brian Wilson's career (unless you count Smile which was never released)... he is one of the greatest arrangers that ever lived. Thriller sucked ass. Sure it was popular, but musically it isn't worth anything.

    65. Re:sooo? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      The Joshua Tree is one of the top albums of all time.
      ...which was ruined by massive overplaying by the "machine". (Not to mention that "Bullet the Blue Sky" is a 2nd-rate ripoff of Zep's "Levee" song.)

      I'd put it in the top 200, not nearly as good as, oh, Warren Zevon's Sentimental Hygiene or Hendrix's Electric Ladyland.
    66. Re:sooo? by internewt · · Score: 1

      Most likely, the album was coming out in November for the Christmas market. It could be finished now....

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    67. Re:sooo? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Why not release it? Are they making the same rash assumption that the RIAA is, namely that anything already being passed on P2P is unsellable in the store? I think statistics have shown otherwise, but maybe I'm missing something.

    68. Re:sooo? by klokop · · Score: 1

      $ perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(1 15),10)'
      Number found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "1 15"
      (Missing operator before 15?)
      syntax error at -e line 1, near "1 15"
      Execution of -e aborted due to compilation errors.
      $

      --
      Passing silhouettes of strange illuminated mannequins
    69. Re:sooo? by Golias · · Score: 0, Troll
      Great. Now compare it with Boy, War or the unforgettable fire.

      Clever of you to leave out October from that list, which even fans of early U2 are forced to admit is total shit.

      Pop is the worst album of their newer sound, yet I would still rather listen to it than War. Tracks like "Staring at the Sun" and "If God Would Send His Angels" invoke every bit as much passion as Sunday, Bloody Fucking Sunday, and were recorded after the band had learned how to play their instruments, rather than before.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    70. Re:sooo? by Rayooz · · Score: 1

      your sig should have oct(115), not oct(1 15)

      --
      Chikli Consulting LLC - http://agileshrugged.com
    71. Re:sooo? by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      So let me get this right... if it doesn't apear on P2P networks then we will have to wait to listen to it and it wont be in a format we all want?!... and this is a Threat? hmmm .. It had better be on P2P networks soon

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    72. Re:sooo? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I've always heard it in the context of the grandparent (something close to peddling), however a quick dictionary search indicates that the correct definition is to carry clumsily; to move slowly or laboriously; an ardurous journey; or a clumsy or stupid person. I guess the selling crap around the globe was taken from one of the first two definitions. I wonder if it's regional (east cost usage indicates a journey western usage to carry a lot of heavy crap and sell it on a trip. I guess you learn something everyday.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    73. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Bondo et al were spending too much time trying to lighten the crippling debt load of 3rd world countries and not enough time watching their important money making product.

      In there somewhere is some hypocracy.

    74. Re:sooo? by Larmal · · Score: 1

      Yea, there's a thousand cases where bands get their unfinished work lifted and distributed and then eventually downloaded, only to have the completed album come out a few months later at the original release date... and have it blow everybody's head. Case in point: The new Wrens album. First one in 7 years. Unfinished copy gets leaked to Kazaa about 3 months before the release date. I download it. I play it. I'm blown away by it. Finished product is released. I buy it cause hey, I like the band. Finished product, in some parts, is completely different. I am treated to hearing the album all over again for the first time... and I love every second of it.

    75. Re:sooo? by mobiGeek · · Score: 1
      The singles market has died because people couldn't be bothered paying that money for something they'll hear in constant rotation ad infinitum for up to two months before release.
      ...or possibly because they can listen to any Clear Channel station for their ad infinitum hit... (ad nosium, ad crapium, ad over-hypeium, ad shootmenowium...)
      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    76. Re:sooo? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      If the majority of people really felt the way you have caricaturized them, then the content industry would not be thriving. I feel sorry for you for feeling so cynical about how people really are. Gloomy.

      Regardless, that is the impression that I and obviously the grandparent AC get from the majority of slashdot posts on p2p or the music industry.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    77. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law

      This is analagous to saying if no woman wants to sleep with /.'er X, then X has no choice but to commit rape

      If it's only available illegally you are still faced with a choice: break the law and listen to the illegal material, or don't break the law and wait for it to be released legally. Your decision makes your a perp or not - but it's still your decision, your choice.

      (the parent was marked insightful? Oh, it's /.)

      (Score:-5, anti-/.-free-for-all!-groupthink)

    78. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's available for free on P2P networks, we'll make it available for people to buy online?

      Just don't get that.........


      LOOK MA!! WE DONE SHOPLIFTED THE WAL-MART!!

      That's the answer to everything now: they'll just download it for free anyway? Great. We aren't even discussing whether it's right or not.

    79. Re:sooo? by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Having acquired the music, the fan will be less likely to pay for it when it is released legally

      This is a myth that has been posted everywhere by the music industry. There has been absolutely no valid proof that this is true. The people who would not have bought the album still won't buy it.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
    80. Re:sooo? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Why don't you blame the thieves rather than the band?

      Because the thing he is blaming them for is releasing an unfinished product to everyone. The thieves didn't cause that, U2 is throwing a hissyfit because ONE person stole from them, and if ONE fan did that, then ALL fans must be assholes who can't wait for it. So fine, if you want it so bad, we'll release it while it sucks (kinda hard for U2 to release something that doesn't suck these days), so there, nyah nyah nyah.

      Those whiny babies should stop crying that someone stole their stuff. Tell the police (not the band, mind you, that would do little good) and move on with your life. Don't make a fucking scene about it & throw a publicity fit.

    81. Re:sooo? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > pissing on your fans

      This isn't really in direct reply to your post, but this was the closest place it applied...

      I don't like U2, as people or musicians. Regardless, I don't think they (or most any other musician) "piss on their fans." I have made some (pretty hokey) music, but a lot of it is all completely different. That's because different moods & circumstances create different songs. To say that a band is doing something to their fans when they change styles is like saying that in the fall, the leaves are turning brown just to spite you.
      People change, even those who have "sold out" (j/k). Sure, the fans are a necessary part of being a successful band, but I don't think musicians should gear their music towards the fans -- and I think most of them really don't. They should make what they want, and if the fans like it, great. If not, f$%# 'em. A good artist writes what he thinks is good -- if they have talent & a good ear for music, other people will think it's good too.

    82. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that require U2 to still have fans?

      Stupid question. Obviously they have fans, or they would not continue to do so well with album and concert sales.

      I consider myself a fan even though I have not bought their music since Achtung Baby. Though I still have a lot of respect for them, my tastes have diverged from their style ever since the one album that came after Zooropa. I'm not bitter that they're changing. There's a lot of other good music out there. And U2's older stuff still rocks.

      So quit trolling. If you don't like their stuff, move on.

    83. Re:sooo? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Someone might unknowingly/accidentally download an executable file

      Even worse, someone might download a U2 song! *shudder* Oh, the inhumanity...

    84. Re:sooo? by naily · · Score: 1
      Nono, what's sad is that there are still media giants out there floating on their own froth and whining about artists' rights, while plundering them to run their own circuses.

      It's good to see that U2 acknowledge the only recourse is to pre-release through legit media - no lawsuits or rantings, just a choice for the die-hard fans to purchase a quality version.

      The more artists take control of their own distribution, the better chance of a fair music industry , with fewer fatcats pushing sugar-water pop onto easily-blinged teenagers, and an industry more in tune with the demands of its consumers.

      --
      We all live in a state of ambitious poverty. -- Decimus Junius Juvenalis
    85. Re:sooo? by nmk · · Score: 1

      What an absolutely stupid statement. It's not possible to tell the difference between good/bad music, because the quality of music can only be measured subjectively. There is nothing such as good or bad music in an absolute sense.

      However, one can make certain objective observations about U2. It is evident that they didn't need to use naked girls in their music videos to increase the popularity of their albums. They also have many hits that were/are very popular despite not being in a movie soundtrack.

      U2, in my opinion, is a great band. The albums mentioned are also some of my favorites. I had no Idea that they were regarded as highly as they are. Whether you like their music is dependent on your taste in music. However, one should have the intelligence to give credit where credit is due. They succeeded only because many people enjoyed their music. Their success didn't depend on the peripheral publicity that accompanies music these days.

    86. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's Slashdot breaking up overly long strings. If he'd use a space once in a while that would take care of it.

    87. Re:sooo? by wuice · · Score: 1

      Yes, Rattle and Hum is a lot of musical wanking. Perhaps they sold out, or perhaps they got into the idea of doing some musical wanking being fun. This being the case, good for them! I don't have any preconcieved notions of what kind of music they are supposed to put out.

      Boy in my opinion has one or two tracks on it I like. The Unforgettable Fire is so-so, but I'd probably put it above Pop. War is probably one of my favorites, though my absolute favorite would probably have to be Achtung Baby, which was put out after they started selling their bodies and minds by your timeline, correct?

      Bono has enjoyed becoming larger than life. In fact, he's created whole stage personas and written songs about becoming larger than life, making fun of it but acknowldging the fact that he revels in it. He certainly gets off on acting like the world's biggest rock star, and he certainly has been in the running for that title at points in his career. Good for him. He's earned it.

      When they started as "passionate Irish kids," that's what they were. I would consider it two-dimensional of them to continue to push that image, even though they're among the richest bands in the world now. Nor would I particularly give a shit about their music if all their songs were about ending third world debt or curing AIDS in Africa. They still write songs about the situation in their homeland (including some songs on the much-detested Pop -- take a listen to Staring at the Sun or Please if you don't believe me).

      If anything, their last album, All You Can't Leave Behind, was the album which to me seemed like they were whoring themselves the most. They made such a big deal of it being a return to "big, beautiful songs" and how they were "getting back to their roots" and shit. That to me sounds like they were trying to suck up to their alienated demographics. However, I still liked the music that came out of it, and that's the bottom line for me. Period. While we can go back and forth about whther or not this is a publicity stunt, and whether or not it's a good or bad thing to take actions for the sole purpose of selling more albums, we have a god-given right to like the music we like for no other reason than we like it. Not that you're arguing this point, I just want to make it clear that I like U2 because I like their songs.

      Very well could be a publicity stunt. I wouldn't think that they needed to resort to stunts for publicity since they are like one of the richest bands ever, and they seem to have no problem selling out stadium after stadium every time they go on tour, but I confess I don't really pay that much attention to what's "hot" and what's "not" these days.

      With U2, most of the songs I cherish most on their albums are the ones that don't become singles. If they get into concept polka in the future, I can honestly say that I'll probably download a couple of their songs (most likely after the album actually came out, though) before I decide whether or not to buy the album.

      You are certainly entitled to your opinion. My opinion is all I'm expressing. It's just that I consider what you're expressing to be no more than that: your opinion. Not facts. Now I'm done rambling.

    88. Re:sooo? by wuice · · Score: 1

      While I wouldn't mind hearing THAT, I'll quote my entire sentence and let you get another read at it. :)

      I've always been a big U2 fan, and I'm willing to follow them musically in whatever direction they decide to go, as long as I enjoy the music that comes out of it.

    89. Re:sooo? by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I think I am an example. I used to buy albums all the time but since Napster I have only bought two in the couple of years (and both times I was not able to get to my favourite P2P app due to restrictions on internet access (on the road for work)

    90. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention they'll probably hear it on the radio, eh?

    91. Re:sooo? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      > What an absolutely stupid statement. It's not possible to tell the difference between good/bad music, because the quality of music can only be measured subjectively. There is nothing such as good or bad music in an absolute sense.

      Quality is something that can be measured somewhat objectively, Taste in the other hand..

      When looking at quality of mustic, you can look at the quality of composition, arrangement and performance for example (not to mention the quality of recording and mixing, but that is not exactly part of the music itself in many (but not all) cases)

      When people talk about good/bad music, they are talking about what they like, that is where the confusion comes from.

      > However, one can make certain objective observations about U2. It is evident that they didn't need to use naked girls in their music videos to increase the popularity of their albums. They also have many hits that were/are very popular despite not being in a movie soundtrack.

      Since when is popular and good the same thing?

      > U2, in my opinion, is a great band. The albums mentioned are also some of my favorites. I had no Idea that they were regarded as highly as they are. Whether you like their music is dependent on your taste in music. However, one should have the intelligence to give credit where credit is due.

      I am not saying that anythign they made after the Joshua Tree is utter crap, actually, when compared to lots of music released during the same time, it comes out rather well. That said, it comes nowhere close to their earlier albums in my opinion.

      > They succeeded only because many people enjoyed their music. Their success didn't depend on the peripheral publicity that accompanies music these days.

      Uh yes it did. Overly used in tv comemrcials overhere at least (Its a beautifull day), extreme level of attention and coverage on music radio and tv stations etc.

      Those may not be the 'tricks' that annoy you or that are cheap in your book, but it s just a slightly different approach to hype generation.

    92. Re:sooo? by davespice · · Score: 1
      However, I might be a counter-example.

      I bought a lot of mainstream albums as a teenager, before file-sharing services were around. Nowadays, I buy a few mainstream albums here and there, but the majority of my purchases are albums from artists I would have never heard of except via file-sharing (meaning purchases that would have probably not been made otherwise). So my increased purchasing (as well as the purchasing made by others like me) is likely to offset at least SOME of the lost revenue caused by downloaders who don't end up paying for what they download in some form or another. I have several friends whose approach to music purchasing is similar.

      That said, I have plenty of downloaded MP3s from "one-hit wonder" bands whose albums I never ended up purchasing. If the band sucks overall, but I like one song, I like having the freedom to get that one song.

    93. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's making a generalization to prove a point, Idiot.

    94. Re:sooo? by shoptroll · · Score: 1

      If you've read any history they realized that Rattle & Hum was a mistake. Why do you think they didn't do anything for 3-4 years before Achtung Baby came out? Heck, they turned down an offer to do the Mission Impossible theme, and only Larry & Adam ended up doing that one.

      --
      Insert Sig Here
    95. Re:sooo? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. The comparison is between "available legally and illegally" and "available illegaly right now, legally in four months". The question is which alternative is likely to earn more money for U2.

      In both cases, the illegal copies will serve the advertising effect that some advocates like to point to, so that factor should be discarded.

    96. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One sentence.

      Eight words.

      And you get all worked up. Baby.

    97. Re:sooo? by Daleks · · Score: 1

      I personally don't consider a band experimenting and dabbling in different musical styles (which is pretty much what U2 has done with every one of their albums) to be pissing on their fans. In fact, I think if anything I would say it's more pandering to release album after album that sounds exactly the same, though that would include some of my favorite bands

      I would agree if making a techno album weren't the trendy thing to do at the time. Pop isn't that horrid of an album, even some songs are alright. But to take a a band like U2 who had put out some of the greatest works of the 80's, which are still incredible today, and see them sink to hipster pop techno was an embarassment.

    98. Re:sooo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're utterly wrong, you twat.

    99. Re:sooo? by jaelle · · Score: 1

      It's not what happens that makes people miserable, it's what they *believe* about it.

      They *could* regard it as advance publicity. A trailer even. People DO buy music that they find on P2P. I do it, my friends do it, and studies have shown that lots of people do it. So what's the big problem here?

      If it's not finished, people will listen and then buy the album to find out what changed!

      I really wonder how the RIAA is benefiting from all this hysteria. They've gotta be making money on it somehow. It has nothing to do with selling CD's.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
  2. I don't get it by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So what if they release it on iTunes? What does it matter? Besides, it'll end up in P2P regardless.

    Of course, I really don't care much about U2 at all.

    1. Re:I don't get it by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the idea is that once it's out, it's out - in its present, incomplete form. Which must be really sad for the band.

      On the other hand, bands like the Beatles used to *thrive* on bootlegs - session tapes would get stolen and circulated, and peoeple would STILL pay to see how the final copy came out.

    2. Re:I don't get it by rokzy · · Score: 1

      that's because most people (or me at least, YMMV) are willing to pay for things they like a lot.

      I only have one illegal film on my hard drive. I saw it at the cinema, I have the soundtrack and I will buy the DVD when it's out.

      shovelling shit down peoples' mouths can only work for so long, but if you make genuinely good stuff everyone wins.

    3. Re:I don't get it by justins98 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it was meant as a threat. I think the logic is that if it becomes available for free, they need to release it for sale ASAP because if they wait a lot of people who would have paid for it will P2P download it for free instead.

    4. Re:I don't get it by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

      U2 is bluffing and/or just being silly (which they have a long history of - just look at their wacko politics). They'll go after what makes them the most money.

    5. Re:I don't get it by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I'm intrigued by the moderation of your post. The only thing insightful there is your subject.

      Translated to another topic, your post might have gone something like:
      "I don't get it, what's the big deal with Doom 3 being released? If not Doom 3, some other 3d game would come out. Oh yeah, I don't even like games."

      Heh...

    6. Re:I don't get it by rokzy · · Score: 1

      why the fuck would I bother lying to people on the internet?

      the film is Shaun of the Dead and I would buy it just to show my support for Simon Pegg/Edgar Wright, let alone for the commentary/extras that will no doubt be great given how good the commentary on Spaced (best sitcom ever imo) was.

      ooh, a joke about meeting women... how funny and original.

    7. Re:I don't get it by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So what if they release it on iTunes? What does it matter? Besides, it'll end up in P2P regardless."

      I doubt it's to stop it arriving on P2P, afterall they claim to be waiting until they see it there. The 'so what' is that people will be given the chance to just buy the music out right instead of simply taking it.

      Frankly, it could work. A.) They're likely to get money they would not have made otherwise. B.) One of the best ways to shy people away from P2P for illegit music downloads is to not create a gap from illegal availability to the release of the content. I prefer their attitude to "our fans our thieves!" P2P may be free, but iTunes is a considerably better service. Encourage people to go there first and they're not so likely to just go download the music.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:I don't get it by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. Plus by downloading from iTunes people can be sure it's the real thing, complete, and of high quality.

      Pretty shrewd on U2's part too.

    9. Re:I don't get it by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Ahhh. Plus by downloading from iTunes people can be sure it's the real thing, complete, and of high quality."

      And, pretty quickly, they could preview it.

      I agree, it is shrewd on their part, and I think it's a good move for everybody. My only nitpick is I think they should just release it on iTunes anyway, but I imagine they won't since they likely have a higher profit margin on the physical CDs. Eh, maybe one day. I mean, how long will it be before a significant portion of the music buying population has some form of high-capacity music player?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:I don't get it by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Beatles were also head and shoulders a better band than U2. Personally, I can't stand them. Joshua Tree, great... since then it's just been ass.

      To my knowledge, one of the biggest bands to rely on bootlegs and such are the Grateful Dead. They weren't big on studio work and there are shitloads of bootlegs available. A buddy of mine in high school was a huge Dead fan and had 4 shoeboxes full of bootleg tapes.

      Metallica once thrived on bootlegs to get recognition. Then they got it and decided that it was a bad thing. That is a band that has lost a lot of respect from a large portion of long-time fans and they're not likely to win many back.

    11. Re:I don't get it by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Silly me, I was thinking of the law as a binary concept (either your breaking it or you're not) but you've changed my life forever.

      IANAL but this is common sense. There are civil infractions, and criminal infractions criminal comes in several varities (summary, misdemeanor, felony...) so yes, there are degrees of "breaking the law".

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  3. spooked by camzacid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ah seems that some one is a bit spooked by this whole thing.

  4. U2 encouraging p2p? by prof_peabody · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this just promotes a P2P release. Post it and we'll release it, almost a reward to the fans...

    1. Re:U2 encouraging p2p? by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I almost wonder if the whole thing isn't a publicity stunt. It certainly has increased the media coverage of an album release that otherwise would have had about none. I for one would have had no idea U2 has released another album.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:U2 encouraging p2p? by prof_peabody · · Score: 1

      I felt that way about the last radiohead album. You get a lot of press from incidents like this... I didn't even know they had a new album coming out.

    3. Re:U2 encouraging p2p? by Skidge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, you would have heard about it, once a song gets picked and played over and over and over again in every possible venue, like Beautiful Day off the last album--especially with the olympics coming up, which also happened to correspond with their last album release.

    4. Re:U2 encouraging p2p? by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, because u2 isn't still making any headway in the world of music. oh wait, they were nominated for a ton of grammy's and won 7 of them for that album. yeah, you'd probably never hear about their stuff being released... ;P

      seriously though, i don't think it is a stunt, but maybe that is wishful thinking.

    5. Re:U2 encouraging p2p? by eXtro · · Score: 1

      I find it strange that you'd use an actual CD of an unreleased album for a photography session myself. It's either a publicity stunt or somebody wasn't thinking.

  5. Re:Don't encourage them by character_assassin · · Score: 2

    Seriously, what's wrong with iTunes? Just wondering.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
  6. I don't understand. by gantrep · · Score: 1

    Great bands....like U2?

  7. Even worse threat by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and in a related article containing an even worse threat, "U2 Threatens To Release Another Album".

    RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!!! THE CRAPPY MUSIC COMETH!

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:Even worse threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the first post gets modded down, and this gets modded up, despite saying essentially the same thing.

    2. Re:Even worse threat by damballah · · Score: 1

      How is your opinion of U2 insightful in any way?

    3. Re:Even worse threat by weston · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: you read Pitchfork Media.

    4. Re:Even worse threat by Ragica · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... Metalica fan? Uh huh, okee...

    5. Re:Even worse threat by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      -1, Obvious?

      /Mixing moderations and Fark tags

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Even worse threat by Lankard · · Score: 1

      I know this is gonna get marked as flamebait, but you must be one of the /.ers who only listen to pretentious garbage like Radiohead. I'm not the biggest U2 fan but I'm sure they still have a lot of fans who will be looking forward to this album. Meanwhile you can continue to listen to Hello Computer and think that its very unique and different that you do.

    7. Re:Even worse threat by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      If they were listening to "Hello Computer" that would indeed be unique and different, given that the album is called "OK Computer".

      btw, and fyi, Radiohead are a much better band live, and are often said to be one of the greatest live acts playing today. There are loads of bootleg recordings of live performances doing the rounds, and I strongly recommend getting hold of one. The montreux jazz festival performance is one of my favourites.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    8. Re:Even worse threat by wuice · · Score: 4, Funny

      How is your opinion of U2 insightful in any way?

      This is Slashdot. In most cases, Slashdot-style moderation almost always boils down to: Score +1, Me Too.

    9. Re:Even worse threat by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      Now that was insightful!

    10. Re:Even worse threat by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      I really think it's funny that a single comment against U2 has suddenly brought on comments from people that assume to know the type of music I listen to. Funny, really!

      Redux: Radiohead is worse than U2. Hello Computer? No clue man, never heard of 'em. From another comment, Metallica? c'mon!! Although, good gawd at least nobody accused me of listening to country.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    11. Re:Even worse threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess... retard? Uh huh, okee...

    12. Re:Even worse threat by wuice · · Score: 1

      Me too!!

  8. Er... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're threatening to release the album in an unfinished state to stores because some poeple may or may not download it from P2P networks? I'll rush right out and buy that... not.

  9. yawn by TechnologyX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They can release it on Aimgrrl.com for all I care, only reason why that shit would ever be on my computer is out of spite.

    --
    Slashdot sucks
    1. Re:yawn by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly right, I'm going to download it just so I can delete it.

    2. Re:yawn by BlueCup · · Score: 2, Funny

      One time in Reno, I downloaded a U2 album just to watch it be removed from my hard drive.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    3. Re:yawn by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      One time in Reno, I downloaded a U2 album just to watch it be removed from my hard drive.

      But that irish looney keeps wailing, and that's what keeps torturing me

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    4. Re:yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One time in Reno, I downloaded a U2 album just to watch it be removed from my hard drive.
      Then I got distracted and missed it. Oh, my friends tried to describe it to me, but it just isn't the same.
  10. Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by Cyph · · Score: 4, Informative

    Smashing Pumpkins did not rush to release their last album on P2P before it hit the stores, rather, they used P2P as the *only* way to release the album. They sent out 25 vinyl sets of the album to various community members to get a P2P release going.

    1. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone has these songs from the pumpkins available, could you post a link?

    2. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by Cyph · · Score: 1

      I don't have a direct link, but you might be able to find it on google. The name of the album is "Machina II - Friends & Enemies of Modern Music". Obviously you'll have better luck searching for "machina 2" or "machina II" or something.

    3. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by prof_peabody · · Score: 1

      They can be found on Billy Corgan's site.

    4. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      The Pumpkins, as I understand it, pushed Machina II out on P2P because Virgin were not interested in putting out another record in a similar vein after Machina I had done so poorly ( hell with that, I thought it was great. )

      You can get it at beZip.de, or from the Chicago Metro's website, or finally from this fansite.

      Try threading the tracks back into the original Machina order as given on Billys diagram, and I, at least, find the story a bit easier to follow.

      Bummer the Machina III remix album from the aborted animated series never got released!

      -- YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    5. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      magnet:?xt=urn:sha1:OU2VZ7J56WNM2W2DUAESH64HFIMBFS BV

    6. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, that's not Billys site - he's over at BillyCorgan.com.

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    7. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by Rai · · Score: 1

      The Pumpkins, as I understand it, pushed Machina II out on P2P because Virgin were not interested in putting out another record in a similar vein after Machina I had done so poorly ( hell with that, I thought it was great. )

      I seem to remember an interview where Billy said they wanted Virgin to release Machina as a double album, but the record execs were fearful because of the poor sales of the Pumpkins' previous record, Adore. So they took 15 of the tracks and made Machina, but rather than let the rest of them set on the shelf, Corgan & Co gave them to friends and asked them to distribute them over the internet. Personally, I think the original Machina would have done better if it had included "Let Me Give the World To You" and "Cash Car Star", but I think Billy wanted the tracks that were most important to the Glass + the Machines of God story.

      I agree with you that Machina was a great record. My personal favorite from the Pumpkins (whom I still consider my favorite band.) Ditto on that remix bummer too.

    8. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by generationxyu · · Score: 3, Informative
      Kind of. Not really. Machina II (The Friends and Enemies of Modern Music) was, as the parent said, pressed to 25 vinyl copies and given to family, friends, and members of the community. A few radio stations got them, with instructions to play it in its entirety if they so choosed. A few members of online SP communities also recieved copies in order to promote the online distribution of the album. Very few non-mp3 sourced copies of it are available... I've yet to get my hands on one.

      But as several people have said, only a few songs from Machina II ever ended up on commercial release - those were included on the second disc of the SP Greatest Hits compilation, called Judas O.

      For more complete information, check here. For a copy of Machina II, try SoulSeek. There's an SP hub on Direct Connect, but they're kind of bastardly about letting people on.

      --
      I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
    9. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by soleblaze · · Score: 1

      sp hub is dead.. and it wasn't that bastardly, you just had to register to get on and could only share live music audios/videos that was orginized. And there's 3 main versions of non-mp3 sourced.. the Q101 Release (which I won a copy), the SPIFC Release, and the Virgin In-house promo. all are vinyl source (though there's rumors that there's a non-vinyl master>dat copy around) you can find plenty of smashing pumpkin show traders out there who have a copy and who will do a B&P if you don't have anything to trade them.. just ask on netphoria.org in their trading forum

    10. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by abdulla · · Score: 1

      They also had the MP3s on their website until the website disappeared off the face of the earth.

    11. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by martissimo · · Score: 1

      thanks for those links my friend, hadn't even heard about the whole deal, but thanks to you I now have the whole album to enjoy at my leisure!

    12. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. I love Machina, and it has played a really important role in my life. Not that I want to get to deep and spiritual you understand, but there are so many levels to that record which you can only get if you're in the right place.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    13. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by hthb · · Score: 1
      Actually, for a copy of Machina II with, try this webpage: http://www.billy-corgan.com/downloads/mp3/machina2 /index.php

      In my opinion it's better than MachinaI.

      It's correct it was Billy'c attempt to say fuck you with the record labels, which didn't think it was worth it releasing the album, since MachinaI didn't make them millions.

      --
      Visit www.doc2pdf.net for a free, no need to register, .doc to .pdf file conversion.
    14. Re:Wrong about Smashing Pumpkins by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Please give credit where it is due. Zappa did this years ago. He had a 4-LP album and wanted to release it. The label wanted 4 separate albums. Zappa took the album to a local radio station, got on the air and told all his fans to start their tape recorders, and played the whole thing.

      Soon, it was released as a 4-LP bootleg. Wasn't until years later that the official Lather release happened. I don't think the circumstances with the record label were exactly the same as the Pumpkins', however. At that point, the Pumpkins were pretty much finished, and Zappa was arguably at his best.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  11. What?! by citadelgrad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who would want to steal a U2 album? Now I'd steal a Jessica Simpson or Nick Lachey. Maybe a Brittney album. Yah! Like totally.

    --
    Losers whine about doing their best ....

    Winners go home and f*ck the prom queen!
  12. Speed up long awaited releases? by angrist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, now someone please steal the next Tool record so we can all get it a couple months early.

    1. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by foidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doubtful. They like to pain over every single second of that album until it is done...
      Before Lateralus was released Tool, on their website, made a list of fake(well, they didn't say at the time they were fake) tracknames and some random music to go with them, just to see how far it would profiliferate on the P2P networks. Shame to, since RiverChrist sounded like such a cool trackname.
      I would rather artists wait till they think their work is finished, they should have control over what they do and do not release....but maybe that is just me.

    2. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I don't know if you've been paying attention, but the most popular artists out there are the likes of Britney Spears or Nelly.

      On their own, they're already damn good. But compared to them...

      Anyway, why the snide remark? What's wrong with Tool? They're one of the few bands that play complex music yet still rock hard.

    3. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      I think the world is better off not having a song named "Poopy the Clown".

    4. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah! Someone on /. with taste! Jolly good show, tool is law.

    5. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say?! GWB has made a record??

    6. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But perish the thought to not have "Hooker With a Penis" ;)

  13. Smart move by djkoolaide · · Score: 0

    If it appears on P2P networks, it will likely be at a low bitrate (128k MP3 or something around there). While iTunes is only 128k AAC, you're still guaranteed that the album has been ripped properly, not just by some kid on KaZaA. I will definately be getting it from iTunes if this happens.

  14. Smashing Pumpkins "last album" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Machina II: Friends and Enemies of Modern Music" was never, and was never intended to be, released in stores.

  15. Here's what I think... by Freudiandave · · Score: 1

    I think they like... think that doing this will somehow punish the person who stole the disc, to make sure it doesn't happen again... or something... Maybe Bono has just finally gone over that final bit of the edge...

    1. Re:Here's what I think... by Flower · · Score: 2, Funny
      Oh good grief. Thanks for the post. Now I got Sunday, Bloody Sunday running through my head with a new twist.

      Bono's going to war against copyright infringement. Literally. Financed by Orrin Hatch. Somebody make it stop!

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:Here's what I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the album is still unfinished. Maybe the threat is that they will release a poorer version of the album and not finish it. If someone is a big enough U2 fan to steal the cd out of Bono's stereo, then perhaps they would wait to spread it around if it meant they would never hear the finished version.

  16. Tonight's task by Chairboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone who would like to hear the music soon, I'll be at home recording tracks of me singing 'yay, can't wait for itunes. C'mon bono, release it to itunes. La la la la!' for 4 and 5 minutes each, then name them after the album and use the songlist from Amazon.com.

    Stage 2, post them to P2P programs but prevent anyone from succesfully downloading them.

    Stage 3, wait until someone hired by the record agency finds them listed and assumes the worst. Presto! The songs are released to iTunes weeks early.

    Mission accomplished.

    1. Re:Tonight's task by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!
      I'm dreading the day when Amazon stops posting track listings, though. Some things are just no fair.

    2. Re:Tonight's task by kooshvt · · Score: 1

      I hate Amazon's CD arrangement. It's difficult to see release orders of albums and what is just an EP, compilation etc. They destroyed the good format that cdnow.com had when they purchased them. I loved cdnow.com and even purchased cd's from them. Yes some people actually use p2p to find new music and actually purchase cds. I will probably even download a song or two from the new U2 album to see if it is worth buying. I use allmusic.com now for track listings, album info and artist history. It's a great site.

    3. Re:Tonight's task by antdude · · Score: 1

      Chairboy: I don't want to hear your singing, man! ;)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    4. Re:Tonight's task by humina · · Score: 1

      The best part will be when a RIAA spider finds it on P2P networks and you get on the list of people to sue.

      --
      check out the best blog ever:
      http://oehlberg.com
    5. Re:Tonight's task by lavar78 · · Score: 1

      Allmusic.com used to be a great site (although badly coded). Now it's much, much worse.

      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  17. Soooo... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    Does this work the other way around as well? If it never appears on P2P networks will they delay the release of their album indefinitely? Please God, I hope so. I would give money to the RIAA to help keep this album off the networks if it meant no more U2.

  18. Don't understand by rokzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if it's a rough cut, then it won't be as good as the one you can buy.

    if it's a practically perfect copy, then why haven't they released it already? (hint: outdated distributed method defended by useless middlemen unwilling to die gracefully)

    maybe they're scared that p2p will allow people to "try before you buy", and just want people to be able to pay for it before they've heard it, cf MPAA wanting mobiles banned because people can talk to friends about crap movies as soon as they've seen it.

    1. Re:Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're just trying to get sympathy press before the release so people remember they exist They're in the news again with this crap... they could release it as a free album anyway, they're hardly starving.

    2. Re:Don't understand by jdwest · · Score: 1

      So, it's like a public beta, only without the time bomb or crippleware code.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    3. Re:Don't understand by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "maybe they're scared that p2p will allow people to "try before you buy", and just want people to be able to pay for it before they've heard it,"

      Heh. Ever notice that you can't return an album you don't like? I'm of the belief that one of the big scares internet music piracy has put into the industry is their "Open your mouth and close your eyes" business model is in serious danger. It would explain why 'innovative' is not a term used to describe the music industry very often.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Don't understand by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it seems bass-ackwards. If a crappy copy gets onto P2P, why rush? The leechers won't buy the real one anyway, so why not take your time and make something special to reward those who do buy it?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    5. Re:Don't understand by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      Well, for most of the pop stuff the record companies are pushing, you'll first hear a single on the radio. Constantly. And that's supposed to sell you on the whole disc. Get it?

      </sarcasm>

    6. Re:Don't understand by RdsArts · · Score: 1
      maybe they're scared that p2p will allow people to "try before you buy", and just want people to be able to pay for it before they've heard it,


      They why would they put it on iTunes where you can sample it before you buy?
    7. Re:Don't understand by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      While I essentially agree, you can get tricked by the samples they play. While browsing for new music by randomly clicking through the recommended links, I got to a band who's name I don't recall with a very nice song. It was kinda of a slow acustic and piano kinda ballad thing. My wife liked it and she bought it. We were playing it, and about 10 seconds after the preview stopped (about 2 minutes into the sound) it goes from being the slow love song to some kinda techno angst fest. Turns out after doing more research that it was a popular gay band, so after listening to the lyrics more carefully we came to the conclusion that that was LITERALLY the "ass pounding" section of the song. It was pretty funny, serves us right for not researching indy bands more carefully before buying.

    8. Re:Don't understand by guyo26 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does most every record store I've been to in the last year have the little scanner things where you can preview any of the songs before buying the disc?

      Some people still buy cd's, whether or not they use p2p to download songs. I'd prefer ripping it myself to a high quality version that I can play at work or in the car or whatever than taking chances on dling 5 or 6 crap versions before I find a decent one.

    9. Re:Don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it could actually used as an effective marketing ploy too.

      release the "album" still rough, leave off half the big songs.

      so it becomes a taste of what is comming. without giving out too much.

      i think that could be very effective.

    10. Re:Don't understand by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      cf MPAA wanting mobiles banned because people can talk to friends about crap movies as soon as they've seen it.

      What happened with that? Did they give up? Always seemed like a stupid idea to me, because most people are going to be home (or near a phone/computer) within 30 minutes of leaving the movie, and then they can make calls, send email & IM their friends to spread the word. MPAA gains 30 minutes at most... And anyone who's seriously bummed about being suckered into seeing a crap movie can always can always talk loudly about it in the parking lot...

  19. What a pity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What pathetic soul would go and steal their CD, after they've spent years making it, only to have all of their hardwork flushed down the drain by some asshole who might release it on P2P networks. Anyone who steals U2's music on P2P networks (do you walk into a clothes store and swipe socks? No? Then don't do it on the internet you thief). Particuarly stealing U2's music considering they are pretty big charity givers and have given AIDS foundations millions.

    1. Re:What a pity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still have copies of the album (how else would they be able to put it on iTunes???)

      And what's this about getting free socks on the internet? I need a new pair or two.

  20. Crappy Music by lakiolen · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the greater of two evils. Either wait a few months and have finished crappy music or have unfinished crappy music right now.

    --


    What are you expecting to find here?
    1. Re:Crappy Music by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      It's the greater of two evils. Either wait a few months and have finished crappy music or have unfinished crappy music right now.

      Just listen to War or Joshua Tree or Achtung Baby.

      These guys make music that will be listened to long after you are gone.

  21. Two words: by vegetablespork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Publicity. Stunt.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    1. Re:Two words: by trenton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cuz U2 can't sell a new album without some gimmick to promote it. They have such a poor fan base, and most of their albums have been crap, after all. Please. If they put it on ITMS *without* any other explanation, it'd have the same affect on sales: positive.

      --
      Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    2. Re:Two words: by scrm · · Score: 1

      Why does this have to be a publicity stunt? The article says that this is U2's first album in nearly four years. I can imagine it would be seen as sufficiently hot property for someone to steal it.

      --
      ---- scrm
    3. Re:Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really think U2 is above PR stunts.

      Actually, as the "Band of the 80s", there's the serious problem of record stores not being wheelchair accessible. So, a iTunes release would play well in their fans' convalescent homes.

    4. Re:Two words: by Threni · · Score: 1

      One word - Negativland.

      Check out some spoof songs that U2 sued over.

      www.fishkeeping.co.uk

    5. Re:Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called hype.

      Perhaps they know they'll never reach the plateau they once were on, so they feel like they need a gimmick, like Metallica's movie.

      It think they both (now) suck (maybe due to success), and they will never get back to where they were, which is sad because both bands started very intensely.

    6. Re:Two words: by Zanth_ · · Score: 1

      Of course critics declared this when their last album was to be released, and to their dismay U2 was awarded 7 grammies, sales nearing that of The Joshua Tree and by far their most critically acclaimed album ever.

      No, they don't suck, but have demonstrated their ability to reinvent themselves. This upcoming album is supposed to be very hard and intense. Apparently they let the Edge do what he wanted, which is something he has been bitching about for some time now.

    7. Re:Two words: by korbin_dallas · · Score: 1

      Two different words:

      WHO CARES?

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    8. Re:Two words: by Richard+M.+Nixon · · Score: 1

      Sturdy. Implacable. Cram. Sarcastic.
      Capable. Irreconcilable.
      A little deluge of adjectives.
      The strongest word is still the word 'free'

      --
      Nobody died when Nixon lied.
      I'm meeting you half way you stupid hippies!
    9. Re:Two words: by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's not even funny.

  22. Re:I threaten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe I will fuck off, what then AC asshole

  23. Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd figure that it's all in the title of the Pumpkin's last album. The truth is that, though Billy Corgan loved the idea of free music, the band was only allowed to release it on-line after Virgin decided that they wouldn't make any money on it.

    As it is, though the album has some great music on it, it is rough... very rough. Given the sales of Machina, which didn't exactly reach the figures that they wanted, F&E was released for free as high quality mp3's.

    So, is U2 the friend, or the enemy of modern music? Is "modern" music that which is envisioned by the likes of Corgan, where expression is free in it's entirety, or is it that which rakes in the cash? I'd say that it's the former, since that's where the real expression comes out. U2's last album was somewhat of a whore for sales... it sounded nice and poppy, none of it was objectionable or edgy... and it sold a lot of copies. U2 is showing their true colors, now, by fleecing us with their name. Their music isn't special anymore, it doesn't have the content anymore, it's just meaningless pandering to the "modern music" crowds.

    I'll stick with my Pumpkins for now.

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    1. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by Teancom · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? U2's last good album was Joshua Tree. They haven't put out an album with more than one or two good songs since. To say that their last album is when they started fleecing us is to be off by a good fifteen years :-)

      Oh, and the Pumpkins only have about six good songs. If you want a band that started out great and have just gotten better with age, try REM. Except for Monster, they can't seem to put out a bad album.

      Okay, I think I'm done presenting my opinion as fact. Flame on!

    2. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by CrabbMan · · Score: 1
      It's pretty disappointing that more bands didn't follow suit with the Pumpkins. I think bands and fans alike would be quite happy to break away from the Big 6; we just need more of the big bands to start the trend.

      Personally, I'm pissed that we still let Ticketmaster rape us like they do. . . . would it really be that difficult to start up another ticket retailer online?

    3. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      U2 is showing their true colors, now, by fleecing us with their name.

      How is releasing their album in it's raw form if the stolen version ends up on a P2P service fleecing us. It's not like their threatening mass lawsuits like Metallica was. Furthermore, aren't we trying to get the music industry to imbrace pay-per-song download services as the future?

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    4. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      It's fleecing because it's (the music's) only purpose is to sell records. It used to be that songs would be written to express some sort of feeling, or message... and that's where the value came in. Now, it's just the name selling the record, which is full of fluff.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    5. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by mat.h · · Score: 1

      I loved how they actually did some sort of promo for a product that the record company couldn't make any money off -- performing Cash Car Star on Jay Leno's Tonight Show. Being one of the more mass-compatible songs on Machina II, it probably would have done pretty good as a single.

    6. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by tonydiesel · · Score: 1

      Yep - U2's last album sold a ton... there were only one or two songs on there that were any good... funny - I found myself listening to it (all of it) over and over. It was one of the few albums with lyrics that actually meant something that year and it won awards almost every time it was nominated for something.

      They're a band with an extreme social conscience, who have worked for peace in Ireland, AIDS assistance in Africa and numerous other causes.

      You may not like their music but to extend that as a judgment of their character is quite a reach.

      Imagine you had invested a fair amount of money and time in something. What's wrong with wanting to have the choice in how it is presented? What's wrong with wanting compensation for your efforts? Or at least the chance to have your efforts break even? Its not like they said they were going to sue the people they catch downloading it; they said they would compete with the illegal option. Yes, the money U2 makes supports their lifestyle. While they already have tons of money, of all of the groups in popular music these days, I'd say they have the greatest chance of doing something good with it.

      Sheesh! I know this is /. but would it kill people to think before they write around here from time to time?

    7. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by No.+24601 · · Score: 4, Funny
      So, is U2 the friend, or the enemy of modern music? Is "modern" music that which is envisioned by the likes of Corgan, where expression is free in it's entirety, or is it that which rakes in the cash? I'd say that it's the former, since that's where the real expression comes out. U2's last album was somewhat of a whore for sales... it sounded nice and poppy, none of it was objectionable or edgy... and it sold a lot of copies. U2 is showing their true colors, now, by fleecing us with their name. Their music isn't special anymore, it doesn't have the content anymore, it's just meaningless pandering to the "modern music" crowds.

      I'll stick with my Pumpkins for now.

      This Casey Casum. Now on with the countdown...

    8. Re:Friends and Enemies of Modern Music... by anothy · · Score: 1
      Is "modern" music that which is envisioned by the likes of Corgan, where expression is free in it's entirety, or is it that which rakes in the cash?
      this is a stupid false distinction. first of all, the quality of music (like art and code) is not related to whether you try to give it away or not. second, U2 (giving them the benefit of the doubt for the moment in assuming this isn't just a publicity stunt) is endorsing modern music (or at least modern music distribution, which seems to have somehow gotten conjoined by folks like you and the Pumpkins) by saying they don't want the online version - the "modern" version - to be stuck with a crap, lower-quality version than would eventually come out in stores, and they don't want to relegate fans who'd get music that way to said bad quality. instead, they're looking to make sure that people who want to get the tracks online have a way to do so without compromising on quality. they fact that they (and the RIAA, sadly) make money off it is irrelevant to the above.
      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  24. A fitting analogy by [cx] · · Score: 0

    They think that by giving their album out online as a "legal download" it will discourage people to steal?

    Maybe if a bank gets robbed before it opens they will say "To hell with the vault, we will just leave our money on the side of the road from now on, that will show them!"

    U2 should stick to enviromentalism and anti-war semantics before trying ass backwards methods of "getting people back" for stealing their music.

    Why they even care is beyond me, I thought U2 was all about "the message they represent" and not about the money. "People that care about people."

    I thought you were cool bono!! COOOL!

    Anyways thats all for me.

  25. Mark as: Flamebait by oasis3582 · · Score: 1

    Seriously people, since when does U2 suck? Oh yeah, since they tried to make some money off of thier album. And for the people that think the p2p version would be a treat, it is unmastered, and as Bono gets older, the cigarettes sink into the vocal cords, and production helps the music sound a lot better. Have you ever listened to an early EP of your favorite group? With a few exceptions, shoddy production can make for a shit record, no matter how talented a group is.

    1. Re:Mark as: Flamebait by Denyer · · Score: 1
      as Bono gets older, the cigarettes sink into the vocal cords, and production helps the music sound a lot better.

      It'd still be interesting to have a comparative listening session... and I don't even listen to U2. I think I have one of their songs on a soundtrack.

      I doubt the publicity will do the band any harm.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    2. Re:Mark as: Flamebait by Frogbert · · Score: 1
      And for the people that think the p2p version would be a treat, it is unmastered, and as Bono gets older, the cigarettes sink into the vocal cords, and production helps the music sound a lot better.

      *sarcasm* Yeah this will really turn people off downloading it, just like how no one downloads CAM rips these days.
    3. Re:Mark as: Flamebait by the+HIM · · Score: 1

      Well, I, for one, do not say he sucks out of spite for his "selling out" or "making money" or whatever bullshit. I say he sucks because I seriously hate his music. I'm assuming that is the main reason for the people previous, with the sell-out thrown in for good measure. ...U2 sucks.

    4. Re:Mark as: Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the early EP's are usually the only ones I consider worth having, and I have about 1500 records.

  26. Senate bill needed... by neil.pearce · · Score: 5, Funny

    A rough cut of the disk disappeared from a recording studio in Nice during a photo shoot .
    It's clear that a photo shoot in Nice has proved itself to be a device that could be used to illegaly copy music. I propose an immediate Senate bill to ban such technology.

    The band was putting together the finishing touches. Most of the album had previously been recorded in Dublin.
    It's clear that being present in Dublin has proved itself to be a device that could be used to illegaly copy music. I propose an immediate Senate bill to ban such technology.

    1. Re:Senate bill needed... by ZOmegaZ · · Score: 1

      Hey, who needs to propose a bill? It's already law that any technology that can be used for such purposes (i.e. Dublin) is illegal.

      Not that that's stopped Congress before...

    2. Re:Senate bill needed... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether being in Dublin is 'a technology' or simply a lack thereof.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Senate bill needed... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      Dublin may be illegal in the US, but when are you ever going to be caught with it there?

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    4. Re:Senate bill needed... by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the satirical article I once read about Dublin's new 'sub-zero' tollerance approach to crime-prevention where it was made illegal to have a north-side address. (The area north of the river Liffey being the poorer and less inviting side of the city)

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    5. Re:Senate bill needed... by rjforster · · Score: 1

      If U2 were heavy metal they wouldn't use Dubly anyway.

      (Except on track 11, of course)

    6. Re:Senate bill needed... by Thomas+Miconi · · Score: 1

      It's clear that being present in Dublin has proved itself to be a device that could be used to illegaly copy music. I propose an immediate Senate bill to ban such technology.

      There's a better way: just start a rumour that oil has been found in Dublin...

      Two days later on CNN: "Actually, we didn't find any WMD in Iraq because Saddam sent them to evil Ireland, which as I have said is part of an Axis of Evil.... What, you thought I said 'Iran' ? Ha ha, blame it on a bretzel crumb on my tongue..."

      Thomas Miconi

  27. As the World Turns by loid_void · · Score: 1

    We have seen the future and it is digital... u 2 can be there.

    --
    Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
  28. Value of unfinished album by usefool · · Score: 1

    Unless U2 is releasing their unfinished album on iTunes (maybe with some rough cuts), it's not going to prevent the rough-cut version from being more popular than the complete album.

    History tells us that incomplete things actually commands more value, like money notes, stamps etc.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Value of unfinished album by ericvids · · Score: 1
      History tells us that incomplete things actually commands more value, like money notes, stamps etc.
      Wha-?

      The only reason why incomplete money notes and stamps "command more value" is because they are rare, not because they are better. In fact, they are obviously worse than the complete thing: they cannot actually be used to buy stuff or send mail, respectively, because they are decommissioned. The value comes from the mere possession of the said item.

      With incomplete music that gets easily duplicated and is just as accessible to people as the complete thing, the rarity value is lost, and the incomplete music is just crap.
      --
      Pet peeve: Profane people propagating perfunctory pedantry.
  29. Re:Don't encourage them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the problem is the town bike, AKA: your grandmother, downloads from iTunes. This is a site for geeks we are supposed to be using things that regular people refuse to use. That is the probelm with iTunes! p.s. If you didn't get the town bike reference what I am saying is your grandmother got riden like the town bike p.s.s. if you still do not understand I am saying your gandmother is a whore who'd like the pen!s

  30. The Smashing Pumpkins Last Album was NEVER... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    released to stores. Can we check our facts before we post on the main page? I'd think the submitter would at least read the article he submited, but I guess even that's too much to ask for around here.

    Also, dear god, whoever stole those files give them back or at least don't post them on the internet. If you post the files those IRISH terrorists have already won (by spreading their crappy music).

  31. Re:"I don't get it"-Oh, that's a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please keep you're lousy fscking blog promotion off Slashdot. If you can put a witty sig about Kerry in there, it would be good for a laugh. My guess is that you're as incapable of humor as you are incapable of appreciating decent music.

  32. My thoughts exactly (NT) by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    no text, unfortunately. i'm a very busy man.

    1. Re:My thoughts exactly (NT) by node+3 · · Score: 1

      i'm a very busy man.

      Then what are you doing reading this reply?

      A-ha!

  33. WTF are they thinking? by hdd · · Score: 1
    They think the release groups care about it? The album will end up on p2p sooner or later, and there is not one damn thing they can do to stop this. Just relax and release the song ASAP and thus minimizing the effects of an early p2p release.

    Great, so put songs on itune, so what? It's only goanna make Steve job the happiest guy on earth.

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  34. U2 Threatens to Relase (a new) Album by Jesterboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one who read this headline "U2 Threatens to Relase (a new) Album"?

    I suppose I just need to skim less...

    1. Re:U2 Threatens to Relase (a new) Album by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-lase? As in laser?

    2. Re:U2 Threatens to Relase (a new) Album by Jesterboy · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show that even using preview, slashdot posts are suceptible to human error (and copy and paste...)...-_-

  35. All a big publicity gimmick? by SchnauzerGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A rough cut of the disk disappeared from a recording studio in Nice during a photo shoot. The band was putting together the finishing touches. Most of the album had previously been recorded in Dublin.
    Maybe I'm a little cynical, but this sounds very fishy.

    Why would U2 take the actual CD of their incomplete album to a photo shoot? And since it was a rough cut, it almost certainly was a CD-R, so you would think that any old blank CD disc would photograph just as well. U2 has been out of the spotlight for several years, and somewhat forgotten. Then all of a sudden, their CD is "stolen" and they are back in the news. And to top it off, they "threaten" to release their album early to foil those dastardly P2P pirates.
    1. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by radish · · Score: 1

      I think you may be right, it may well be a setup. However, one explanation I can think of is that the CD just happened to be in one of the band member's bags or whatever - maybe they were listening to a new mix in the car on the way to the shoot? The article I read didn't suggest that the CD was involved with the shoot in any way, just that it was there.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it is, it's a pretty shitty marketing gimmick, it just reminds me how out of touch the big labels and their "products" are.

    3. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. I mean you just happen to not only have it with you but leave it lying around? Umm... sure. But all of the sudden everyone is talking about U2 again and suddenly people remember they still make music.

      They've got more money than a few small countries combined -- whatever happened to it being "about the music". They should release it for free :D

    4. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A rough cut of the disk disappeared from a recording studio in Nice during a photo shoot.

      Not that I would have any clue about what's really going on. But could it be possible that they were at this studio in Nice with a rough cut to do more production/recording on the album or a couple tracks? and that the photo shoot could have been there as a result of them actually trying to work on it?

    5. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      I dunno maybe they were in a recording studio in Nice putting together the finishing touches on the album, when during a photo shoot it was stolen. The photo shoot could have been miles away, it just says it was stolen during the photo shoot, so while they were at a photo shoot, the disk was stolen from the recording studio, the photo shoot could have been in the recording studio but it doesn't say.

    6. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bands often have many versions of their music on CD as the songs progress. They listen to it for missed beats, bad sound, possible enhancements, whatever. It's not uncommon at all.

    7. Re:All a big publicity gimmick? by .killedkenny · · Score: 1

      I can just hear the photographer...could you guys move over that way for this next shot? Yes, over beyond my assistant, away from the CDR deck, that's right, now look over that way...hold it...hold it....*FLASH* - got it!

  36. Re:You forgot a step... by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    4. $$$$Profit$$$$

  37. It is a shame, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how could the band let this happen? Why did they bring a copy of the album to a photo-shoot? For it to have gotten stolen, I assume they left it alone. One would think they would be smart enough to guard that disc at all costs.

  38. Re:This is ashame by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 0, Troll

    Just because someone is a complete moron does not mean you should invalidate everything he says. It is very possible a complete moron, through stupidity could say something smart.

  39. Excellent Post! by simetra · · Score: 1

    Bravo!

    The only thing U2 is good for is a politically-correct answer for politicians to use when asked what bands they like.

    I find Bono extremely annoying and self-important. Every song of theirs features the same annoying twang guitar chord. Thanks a lot "The Edge". What kind of name is that anyway?

    The Brits are extremely pompous and annoying, but at least we can thank them for Led Zep, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, The Who, The Clash, and others. Ireland? Forget it. Stick a fork in it, it's done.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Excellent Post! by Snoopy77 · · Score: 1

      "The Edge". What kind of name is that anyway?

      At least the Irish can spell ....

      Axl Rose - 'I thought that was how you spell it'

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    2. Re:Excellent Post! by simetra · · Score: 1

      ? Most I've known are too drunk to spell their names.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    3. Re:Excellent Post! by Otter · · Score: 1
      Every song of theirs features the same annoying twang guitar chord.

      ...that's ripped from Paul McCartney. (Who probably cribbed it from some American blues artist, but if so, I can't place it.)

    4. Re:Excellent Post! by stigpalm · · Score: 1

      U2 aren't Brits they are Irish

    5. Re:Excellent Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Edge". What kind of name is that anyway?

      "The Twat" didn't have the same ring about it. More truthful maybe...

      Posted anon so Da Edge doesn't track me down...

    6. Re:Excellent Post! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      "Ireland? Forget it. Stick a fork in it, it's done."

      RTWFP

    7. Re:Excellent Post! by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Well, Ireland produced The Cranberries, but I never thought of Ireland as a musical country. They've made other contributions. So let's face it:

      It's all about Guiness.

      Note: yes, somewhere in that ethnic stew that is my background, there are a couple of Irish[men|women]. So no, I'm not a trolling bigot.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    8. Re:Excellent Post! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot "The Edge". What kind of name is that anyway?

      I think it's a nickname, sort of like Simetra...

      And hey, the Pogues are a great Irish band!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:Excellent Post! by dildatron · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean Guinness.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    10. Re:Excellent Post! by irokitt · · Score: 1

      Time like these I wish for a spell checker.

      Hang my head in shame...

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    11. Re:Excellent Post! by natd · · Score: 1
      You didn't think of Ireland as a musical country?

      You've never been there have you?

      (and I note your inability to spell one of the bigger brand names in the world has already been corrected).

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    12. Re:Excellent Post! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      And hey, the Pogues are a great Irish band!

      Counter-strike: The Corrs' musical blandness cancels out any perceived greatness of the Pogues.

      Agree with you about "The Edge"'s name though. The guy wouldn't be complaining about the name if he liked U2. Is it a worse stage name than "Ringo Starr"?

      Nope.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:Excellent Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > It's all about Guiness.
      > Perhaps you mean Guinness.

      No, he's right. It's spelled Guiness when you're drunk.;-)

    14. Re:Excellent Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thin Lizzy.

    15. Re:Excellent Post! by feargal · · Score: 1

      The Brits are extremely pompous and annoying, but at least we can thank them for Led Zep, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, The Who, The Clash, and others. Ireland? Forget it. Stick a fork in it, it's done.

      UK: Population 60 million.
      Ireland: Population 3.5 million, producers of Thin Lizzy, Van Morrison, The Undertones, Bob Geldof, The Pogues, The Corrs, Sinead O'Connor, Clannad, Cranberries, Ash to name a few...

      "The Edge"? "Slash"? Who cares?

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    16. Re:Excellent Post! by JackDeth · · Score: 1

      Maybe he gets his beer from the same guy who sells Rollex's on the street. :)

    17. Re:Excellent Post! by feargal · · Score: 1

      Uh, before anyone gives out, The Corrs are there because they're cute.

      --
      "A goldfish was his muse, eternally amused"
    18. Re:Excellent Post! by rotor · · Score: 1

      The Brits are extremely pompous and annoying, but at least we can thank them for Led Zep, Pink Floyd, The Beatles, The Who, The Clash, and others. Ireland? Forget it.

      Ummm... The Pogues?

      --
      Addlepated - punk & metal
    19. Re:Excellent Post! by Colazar · · Score: 1
      Irish musicians who became widely popular off the top of my head:

      Sinead O'Connor

      Enya

      Nina Hynes (OK, she's not broken out yet, but seems to be on the cusp)

      Actually didn't care much for Sinead O'Connor much when she was popular, but damn if I didn't play one of her albums the other day and I was amazed. She'd have fit in perfectly around 2000, she was just a bit ahead of her time.

      There's also all the Riverdance-inspired crap, but let's not talk about that.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    20. Re:Excellent Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOT! Michael Flatley's a Chicago boy. Pin that one on the U.S.

    21. Re:Excellent Post! by Colazar · · Score: 1
      True, but Michael Flatley wasn't the one to put Riverdance together, he was just the one they cast as the lead dancer. It was either an Irish or a UK company (I know, big difference, but I don't remember for sure) who wrote the show.

      Now, Lord of the Dance/Feet of Flames, yeah, that we can all blame on Michael Flatley.

      --
      He decided to just watch the government, and kind of scale it down to size, and run his life that way. --Laurie Anderson
    22. Re:Excellent Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flatley was a plumber from Chicago.

  40. To Quote: by wobedraggled · · Score: 0

    "Fucking Brilliant"

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  41. Re:YES YOU FUCKING HOMOSEXUAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your summation simply proves that the Grammys don't know shit about music. They know about mainstream, and that is about it.

    Side note, yes, I liked earlier U2 (a lot), but they quickly lost their edge (pun intended). If you need to know their pinnacle, it was around the time you would dance in the mirror to their music.

  42. But Sonny Bono still owns you by tepples · · Score: 1

    Bono's going to war against copyright infringement.

    In this case Bono of U2 won't be the first Bono to support strengthening copyright law.

    1. Re:But Sonny Bono still owns you by Flower · · Score: 1
      Ok. Now I'm serious. Quit it. This stream of consciousness crap is beginning to freak me out.

      *in Flower's mind* He's back from the dead and can't rest until he's found the missing U2 tracks. Oh god. Now I hear him. He's dressed in that old 70's outfit he wore on Sonny and Cher and singing. Singing Sunday, Bloody Sunday!

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:But Sonny Bono still owns you by BlueStrat · · Score: 1
      "Now I hear him. He's dressed in that old 70's outfit he wore on Sonny and Cher and singing. Singing Sunday, Bloody Sunday!"
      Hey, be thankful it's not U2s' Bono singing "I Got You Babe"!..oh,no!!..a horrible thought..I hope that's not what he plans to release on this album if it hits P2P!! Oh, the Humanity!! Every 4 hours on any Clearchannel pop station. Excuse me while I find an icepick for these eardrums.
      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  43. You know it is bad when... by twalls · · Score: 1

    A band threatens to release a new album.

    *Pictures Bono holding Steve on the ledge while waving around an iPod.*

    "Don't make me do it!"

  44. Oh No! by mojowantshappy · · Score: 1

    What the hell, U2 threatens to... release the album!!!! Holy crap!

    --

    This page was generated by a Barrel of Circus Midgets, and that is the way I like it!!!

  45. Re:This is ashame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to Limousine Conservatives?

    You think Bush and Cheney care about workers or something?

    Bush comes from a very elite New York family that is worth millions and millions of dollars.

    You think a New York blue blood like Bush gives a shit about people like you?

    Obviously not otherwise they wouldn't have consistantly given you the shaft for the last 4 years.

  46. Re:This is ashame by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If your sick and tired of it why did you post as AC FUCKWAD

  47. all you can't leave behind by slumpy · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the album was stolen by Father Lankester Merrin who'll know what to do with it.

    --
    http://www.commaecho.com
  48. If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    Let us know! It's supposedly basically done too, but will be undergoing editing/refinement/etc. in the future months (early 2005 release expected. WTF?).

    BTW, is Trent Reznor on Doom3?

    1. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by rokzy · · Score: 1

      >BTW, is Trent Reznor on Doom3?

      AFAIK he quit/was fired either way not involved any more.

    2. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by NFNNMIDATA · · Score: 1

      No, one of his former band members did the theme song though. He cited time, money and BS as reasons he dropped out of Doom 3.

    3. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He cited time, money and BS as reasons he dropped out of Doom 3.

      If that's true, what a fucking 'tard. I really like some of Trent's music, but give up the opportunity to do Doom 3? Insane... but then again I bet there is other talent out there that could do a better job of making dark ambience suitible for the game.

    4. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give up the opportunity? You're kidding, right? What does he care? He's way more famous than id.

    5. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      BTW, is Trent Reznor on Doom3

      Nope. Doom3 has no music except the theme song which was made by Chris Vrenna and Clint Walsh. No Trent :(

    6. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Bloodlent · · Score: 1

      I'm not buying Doom 3 because he quit on it to go work on Bleedthrough. I'm that obsessed.

    7. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh can't wait
      that Trent...such a poet
      ...I wanna *uck you like an animal
      amazing lyrical journey
      I hope some snags his cd and puts where it belongs...up trent ass

    8. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

      Haha, looks like you just wrote a song for that lameass poser no-talent band Limp Dicksquick.

    9. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Trent answers that question on the NIN site. Linky here.

      Sorry, for some reason, Trent seems to think it's artistic to post the answers to questions on a dodgily typewritten sheet that has then been scanned and saved as a .gif :S

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    10. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Including the word fuck censored for an MTV friendly single.

    11. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I liked Pretty Hate Machine, and I liked Fixed better than Broken, but what I can't stand about NIN is that he's named after one of the Cabbage Patch Kids I had when I was a young'un (Trent Mickey).

      Or at least that's the way I see it.

    12. Re:If anybody has Nine Inch Nail's Bleedthrough by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

      No way, Broken is better than Fixed.

  49. U2 sucks now anyways... by Mitleid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm usually not one to listen to popular music (not that I'm knocking it or anything.) Organic instuments never really appealed to me, but U2 is one of the few popular bands that I could always seem to get into. My musical tastes are mostly aggressive electronic music (industrial: Skinny Puppy, Haujobb, yadda yadda), so maybe I'm not the right person to be giving a critique on U2, but as far as I see things they've just totally sold out and shown that they seriosuly have no clue.

    For example, take the release of their albumb POP back in 1997 or something. It was an interesting albumn; it sorta picked up where Zooropa had left off. It was a lot more "experimental" (at least for them) and just by listening to it I sort of got the felling that U2 didn't really give a fuck and just wanted to make the music they were inspired to make. Well, the critics and many of the fans totally wrote the album off as too "electronic", and a few years later U2 releases the completely horrid All That You Can't Leave Behind, which I never even had any interest in at all, but the songs I did hear were just so boring and cookie cutter. But the kicker is that the album went on to sell VERY well, not to mention a US tour with people willing to sell their momma's own titty just to get a ticket. Shocking!

    Anyway, I think the "threat" of putting their new album on iTunes because it's been stolen just shows how out of touch celebrities get when they hit the big time. And I don't mean just famous; I mean HUGE. U2 has been a big band for nearly 20 years now, if not more, and as far as the politics that they might have been aligning themselves with before that association is obviously completely gone. Personally, I don't believe in that shit anyway, as politics in popular forms of entertainment seems to me to be just another marketing tool, but that's my own take on things.

    --

    --
    Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    1. Re:U2 sucks now anyways... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Organic instuments never really appealed to me

      Hey now... Don't ask, don't tell, a'ight?

    2. Re:U2 sucks now anyways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you were born a prissy Britloving cocksucker.

    3. Re:U2 sucks now anyways... by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. As far as I'm concerned, Achtung Baby is one of the greatest albums ever; up there with Pet Sounds and Sgt Pepper. The album is so perfectly cohesive - each song a gem in it's own right yet so fitting to the rest of the material. I'm guessing Brian Eno's production had something to do with that. Zooropa was decent, Pop was interesting and underrated. But ATYCLB -- BORING.

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  50. Re:Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found it odd that Virgin fucked it all up, because I think Machina II was far better than Machina I. Than again, Corgan wanted Machina II to be freely downloadable to whom bought Machina I-- as a marketing device (this is becoming the norm now, but was not done back than), but the record company and major music stores in Europe wanted to copies of Machina II to sell. SP got fed up with their label, and just released the music, since they no longer we obligated to make/release albums for Virgin.

  51. Re:Don't encourage them by yoda634 · · Score: 0

    I just don't like the whole concept of trying to make people pay something for nothing. You get no actual benefit over the less legal way, but Apple lines their coffers. I've got moral issues with corporatization like that.

  52. This is a Non-Story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's just another way to get their name in the news while simultaneously promoting iTunes Music Store, which Bono has already appeared in promotional material for.

  53. /me confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally don't get this (and I totally haven't read the article either ;-).

    Who gives a toss if they put it on iTunes or not? The fans will buy it no matter what, and the pie-rats will download it from P2P no matter what (or steal it the old fashioned way: borrow the CD from a friend).

    If they *really* want to fuck with the filesharers, they'll finish the album and change a few songs and write a few new ones, make it better (stop laughing) then release it and surprise everybody.

    That's what some indy labels have done.. basically seed the P2P networks with a bunch of crap and call it the new album, then surprise everybody with the real album. Yeah, you'd think it would backfire and people not buy the album because they heard the "P2P promo", but remember we're talking about people who buy music, not "brand names" and word gets around.

    Oh well, U2 are definately "old timers" in the business, not really clued in to the way things work these days, so I can't really be concerned.

  54. iTunes carries little appeal in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1. Downloading from iTunes isn't exactly fast. And if it is, you're just getting lower quality music. I don't subscribe to iTunes (and neither does the majority of the world), so I'm pretty sure the amount of effort to create an iTunes account with address and payment information, and then download a decent-quality version of the full U2 album will be non-zero. I'd rather
    find (easily) the bittorrent for the album and click. No personal information given. No payment information. Easy.

    2. Consider that it was a good quality recording that was stolen, so there will likely be at least one non-lossy rip floating around (FLAC, etc.) and at least some good 320kbps rips also. Can I get non-lossy quality from iTunes? Or at least 320kbps-equivalent?

    I just can't see the advantage of iTunes. And don't lay legal crap on me. I live in Canada, and P2P has been put to the legal test here, so all I need to do click, download, and play. Yummm...

    1. Re:iTunes carries little appeal in Canada by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      ACtually, the itunes signup is quite easy... one form that asks for name, address, and credit card number. Basically, the minimum amount of information needed to securely conduct business.

      Download speed depends on your connection of course. The files are 128kbps AAC, which to my ears are damn close to 256k mp3s in sound quality. It really is way better than the vast majority of what you will find on the P2P networks.

    2. Re:iTunes carries little appeal in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even simpler: allofmp3.com

      not only simpler, but better quality for substantially less, as in i can get an entire album at good quality for 50-60 cents. but you keep having fun paying 99 cents a song...

    3. Re:iTunes carries little appeal in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one subscribes to iTunes. It's not a subscribtion service.

      You are not anonymous when using BitTorrent. You *do* know that,right? If one wanted to, you could be found armed with the relevant torrent.

  55. Re:Threat? by PabloJones · · Score: 1

    Easy.... the band works in Mysterious Ways.

  56. Cool magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny stuff.

  57. Beautiful Day is from their last album? by jbellis · · Score: 1

    I feel like I've heard that song at least enough to last back into the 80's.

  58. Very important matters from very important people. by melankolik · · Score: 1

    This is the part that bugged me the most.

    French police have launched a major operation to find the disc.

    Next time a frenchman misplaces a copy of his favorite album, I guess he should just call up the police, and they'll get right on that, too. Right?

    Officer: What's that? Someone is breaking into your house? Ok, can that wait like another 15 minutes? We just got a lead on U2's lost CD. They're great, aren't they?

  59. what happened? by jbellis · · Score: 1

    they used to have such a unique sound. Seems like it's all been downhill post-Joshua Tree...

    Did they lose band members or just get old and lazy?

    1. Re:what happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You got older and developed taste.

  60. Re:Music Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know that the big movies make the majority of their money on the first weekend of their release? The initial release is the real money-maker for most media in modern times. In fact the sales of Nirvanna's "Nevermind" were artificially blown up because of Christmas sales. A little known fact is that "Nevermind" broke the record for the most returns for any music release, because many people returned it after receiving it Christmas Day, but music stores and radio stations focus exclusively on sales, usually initial sales. There's big money and big profits involved- and it effects you're rights and privilges as a consumer

  61. SO WHAT?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So WHAT!!??? He's a fucking MUSICIAN!! It isn't his JOB to care about anyone's ass other than his own, and he actually goes beyond that by helping out charities, Amnesty International, whatever.
    I don't know what planet you were raised on, but isn't it the job of our nation's LEADERS to help out Americans in need? Get your shit straight.

    1. Re:SO WHAT?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, it is the job of our nation's leaders to run the country.

      People are responsible for providing for themselves and their families, not the government. Thinking it is the responsibility of the government to provide for everyone is the reason the U.S. is so fucked up.

  62. What crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U2's music is such crap, I can't believe anyone would even want to download it free on a P2P network.

  63. It's a hoax. by sakusha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This story doesn't pass the smell test. Nobody brings a live CD to a photo shoot, where this CD was supposedly stolen. The usual industry practice is to shoot a photo of the packaging, which is provided without the actual CD, which may not even be complete at the time of the photo shoot.
    I used to work in product packaging, and many many times I produced package comps (full quality mockups) for CDs, DVDs and VHS tapes that would not be finished for many weeks or months. The advertising production usually precedes the finished product. Anyone who would take the final unreleased product to a photo shoot, where there are a whole lot of bozos floating around just waiting to steal anything that's not nailed down, well, they're just asking for trouble. That's the whole reason to send faked comps instead of live product to shoots.

    1. Re:It's a hoax. by typhoonius · · Score: 5, Informative

      Who knows; the band has a history of stupid leaks:

      • Around 1981, before the release of their second album, October, a suitcase containing Bono's handwritten lyrics was stolen. Apparently, he sort of ad-libbed it in the studio.
      • In 1990, a three-disc bootleg of outtakes from the Achtung, Baby sessions was leaked. It contained rough takes that would eventually become the songs on the album
      • In 1996 or so, an MP3 of a rough edit of "Discotheque," the lead single for their Pop album, was leaked onto the internet.
      • Around 2000, Bono apparently lost a laptop containing rough mixes of songs from their upcoming All That You Can't Leave Behind. It was returned safely, though, and there wasn't a leak.
      • Later that year, though, the band decided to post 30-second snippets of each song from their new album. They were going to release one new snippet a week until the album was released. Unfortunately, the clueless webmasters had already uploaded all of the songs and just didn't link to them yet, so fans just guessed at the file names and downloaded all the snippets early.
      • In 2002, several different mixes of "Electrical Storm" were played on radio stations and were leaked onto the internet.

      In any case, this new album is about three years overdue. Their last album was released in October 2000, and the tour supporting it wrapped up in December 2001. What the hell have they been doing since then? I dunno, I sort of lost track. Kind of sad when you don't know that one of your favorite bands is releasing a new album soon until you read it on Slashdot.

    2. Re:It's a hoax. by MartinB · · Score: 1

      You're assuming it was a photoshoot of the packaging. If that were the case, the band wouldn't be anywhere near it. However, if you RTFA (actually, RTF original A that Wired lifted the story from) it was a shoot of the band for Blender magazine.

      Last Friday, U2 had their new CD - which they had just finished recording the weekend before - stolen during a photo shoot in the south of France. Only a handful of copies existed but guitarist Edge decided to play his personal CD on the studio stereo during a shoot for Blender magazine.

      When they wandered out to take some locations pictures, Edge neglected to press "Eject". Apparently, the band were all posing in an empty swimming pool, 50 metres from the studio, when someone snatched the CD.

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    3. Re:It's a hoax. by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      While this story is all kinds of fishy, I think it's much more likely to be a publicity stunt (maybe even one that they didn't originally plan - a "turn your frown upside down" sort of thing) for sales of the new album.

      Small kudos to them for going with iTunes, anyway. With the name recognition U2 carries (and the huge amount of money they have), they really don't need all of the "resources" of a record company (like marketing, for example). If they played their cards right, they could be the model for the end of the old, crotchety, outdated record labels, and help iTunes succeed where mp3.com largely failed.

    4. Re:It's a hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe so but I live in Nice and I can tell you the cops have been all over this for the last week. The studio was shutoff and all the staff were interviewed. I don't think U2 would pull this for a new album. It's U2, the album is going to run off the shelves anyway.

    5. Re:It's a hoax. by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      One of the band members said it was his personal copy. He was probably listening to it in his spare time to figure out where he wanted to make changes to the music.

    6. Re:It's a hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post makes it sound like they took the CD with them, away from the studio, to some photo shoot at some remote location, but that's not the way it happened.

      The photo shoot was at the recording studio, which U2, and other bands, frequently do. My guess would be that the band didn't clean up and make everything perfect for their guests before they arrived, and a CDR was sitting out, which I would imagine is pretty common in a recording studio.

      Some punk that was working the shoot picked it up thinking nobody would ever notice. Who knows how long it was before someone actually did.

      I'm thinking, though, that it would be pretty easy to figure out who took it, unless they let just anyone into the photo shoot, which I doubt, but don't really know.

      My best guess would be that a very limited number of people associated with the photo shoot were allowed in. How many could that be? 5 or 10 people maybe? It seems like questioning those folks could take you a long way toward finding out what happened. For all we know, though, the person that took it doesn't even know they have it. It could have even fallen innocently into their bag, or under some equiptment to be found a few years from now when the studio is renovated.

      I'm a HUGE U2 fan. I can't get enough of them. But I have to admit that this does sound like a publicity stunt to me. A good excuse to pre-release the album on iTunes...which has been very good to U2.

    7. Re:It's a hoax. by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      It was probably just on a CD-R with minimal labeling. This happens all the time, someone who's working the mixing loses their copy, one of the bandmembers...before you know it, it's leaked.

    8. Re:It's a hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      erm, nobody said that was the CD they were photographing, did they? If a band member was there, the CD could have been....

  64. Re:"I don't get it"-Oh, that's a surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of curiosity, do you complain about liberals who post political links in their sig? Or are you just offended that a conservative might mention their politics in earshot of you?

  65. Call Inspecter Clouseau! by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    Obviously a case for the Pink Panther! Seriously... I've seen some comments about how "out of touch" U2 is... but I think they leave as much of the promo crap to the suits in the marketing department as they possibly can. I beleive the label is mainly responsible for deciding when to release the cd. The boy in the band may be as puzzled about this ploy as ./ readers, and they may care even less.

  66. Re:Speed up long awaited releases? Yeah Right! by weapon · · Score: 0

    So to get HL2 out quickly we need to steal the binaries or the sorce code, why hasen't any one thought of that before, hey wait a second didn't that sort of backfire

    Weapon

  67. My deepest apologies by Flower · · Score: 1

    More like "What is that? You have someone breaking into your house? You must wait. U2 has lost their music and won't leave the country until we've found it. French culture is at risk. At risk we tell you!"

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    1. Re:My deepest apologies by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      How did I miss your posts before tonight? Welcome to my friends list.

  68. Re:Don't encourage them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get no benefit out of buying a CD from a store rather than walking into said store, grabbing the CD, tucking it under your shirt, and walking out without paying. So you support shoplifting as well, eh?

  69. In Love With Bono? by enforcer999 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    As a 42 year old woman...activist and all out politically active person and geek. I love Bono. Is it a stalker thing? Nope! He means well and I support him in this. Is he sexy? Yep! Uhh, sorry /. for changing the subject. ;) Is this off topic? ;)

    1. Re:In Love With Bono? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, a chickypoo, eh?

      We-he-hell... *slicks back hair*

      Oh, wait. OH GOD NO! YOUR NAME IS... ENFORCER??? Am I going to be headed up Butt-Plug Boulevard soon? *wimper* not again...

  70. Pink Floyd by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    U2 is just being babies....

    Pink Floyd had Dark Side of the Moon bootlegs in stores....

    "Pink Floyd played a concert version of Dark Side at London's Rainbow Theatre in February 1972. To their dismay, a bootleg recording of the concert sold 100,000 copies about a year before the official release." Article

    And look what it became...

    "In the USA, DSotM is the 18th best-selling album of all time and has spent a total of over 740 weeks on the Billboard magazine music charts with the longest continuous period lasting 591 consecutive weeks. It reached the #1 chart position in the US, Belgium and France; even in 2002, thirty years after the album's release, over 400,000 copies were sold in the United States, making the record the 200th bestselling album that year. "Time", "Money" and "Us and Them" have become radio call-in favourites (with "Money" having also been a bestselling single in the USA)." Wikipedia

    If it is good enough people will still buy it. So if this record is phenomenal U2 should just finish it.

    1. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me, I need to get that album, and a copy of wizard of oz...

    2. Re:Pink Floyd by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Pink Floyd has talent. U2 is just a bunch of self important pompus asses...

      In All seriousness, who cares if they release the album to itunes? Do they really think this is going to work to their advantage? If this album appears tomorrow on Kazaa it won't matter when it appears on itunes, those who are going to steal it are going to steal it reguardless of release date. The fans who are going to buy to support the band are still going to buy... it's that simple.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:Pink Floyd by Bastian · · Score: 1

      I think it's worth pointing out that a bootleg of a concert is much more different from a finished album than a lossy compressed version of that album, in a whole lot of ways.

    4. Re:Pink Floyd by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      > Yeah, but Pink Floyd has talent. U2 is just a bunch of self important pompus asses...

      Oh yeah, no self-important pompous asses were ever in Pink Floyd. Roger Daltry called, he wants to be acknowledged.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    5. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're musicians, goddamnit. It's their job.

    6. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Roger Waters, you insensitive clod.

    7. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is Pink Floyd has talent, U2 is a bunch of whiney politician-ass-kissing irishmen with no talent. Someone PLEASE shoot that fucker bono, PLEASE!

    8. Re:Pink Floyd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course this ISNT a finished album. It is unfinished. Learn to READ.

    9. Re:Pink Floyd by andrius_sytas · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Pink Floyd played a concert version of Dark Side at London's Rainbow Theatre in February 1972. To their dismay, a bootleg recording of the concert sold 100,000 copies about a year before the official release.

      That is NOT true - Pink Floyd became famous enough to sustain 100,000-strong bootleg sales only AFTER the OFFICIAL release of Dark Side of the Moon in 1973.

      The article probably talks about British Winter Tour bootleg LP, which featured 3 new and unreleased songs (that's over 45 minutes of music) recorded in 1974. Many buyers apparently believed they are getting new Pink Floyd album.

      It's hard to evaluate the effect of the bootleg on album sales - the 3 songs underwent major changes in studio and eventually were released on two different albums, Wish Your Were Here and Animals. Both albums sold in millions, but were not as successful as Dark Side of The Moon.

      However, the success of the bootleg caused Pink Floyd to change their live shows - in contrast to earlier days, they never again played songs which were not already released officially. Thus, in this particular case, the bootleg release of new songs DID harm the fans.

    10. Re:Pink Floyd by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      That reminds me, I need to get that album, and a copy of wizard of oz...

      Too much hastle, versions of The Wizard of Oz with a DSotM soundtrack are available for download on your favourite p2p program. It's much better, as you can fast-forward/rewind without losing sync.

    11. Re:Pink Floyd by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Roger Daltry called, he wants to be acknowledged.

      It's Roger Waters...

      But I've never seen Roger stand before international trade orginizations and demand that they listen to him. He May be opinionated but atleast he knows his place better than Bonzo.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    12. Re:Pink Floyd by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      While you are at it, you might want copies of Pink Floyd's Echos, and 2001 a space oddyssy. Start the music when the video shows the text "Jupiter and beyond...".

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    13. Re:Pink Floyd by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1
      No, it is in reference to the show Feb 17 1972, Rainbow Theatre, London.


      This
      Or This
      Or This
      Or This
      Or This

    14. Re:Pink Floyd by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Boh! I must have been drinking.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    15. Re:Pink Floyd by andrius_sytas · · Score: 1
      No, it is in reference to the show Feb 17 1972, Rainbow Theatre, London.

      Not right - none of these bootlegs sold in hundred-thousands, whereas British Winter Tour (recorded 1974-11-19) did - mostly because it was mistaken for new Pink Floyd's official album by many.

      The story of British Winter Tour bootleg is described in printed books on Pink Floyd; on the net, this history at least mentions it. So +5 moderated grandparent's theory (that bootlegs help popularity of official releases) relies on wrong information.

  71. Priorities by realStrategos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "French police have launched a major operation to find the disc."

    I just realized how screwed up this world really is. A major police operation has been launch to find a CD. Aparantly all other crimes have been defeated.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    1. Re:Priorities by Flower · · Score: 1

      The CD is a tangible asset representing a couple years of work and probably a couple hundred thousand dollars worth of studio time. This isn't like the time somebody swiped the Marky Mark CD you bought at Camelot for $20.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    2. Re:Priorities by mousse-man · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The police is not there to protect the commoner, but to protect the powerful.

      If it really were a way to defeat crime, there would be lots more big mafia bosses in jail, and those who embezzle funds.

    3. Re:Priorities by festers · · Score: 1

      Jeeze, it's not like they called off the entire French policy force to find one lousy CD. I'd think they'd be able to multitask, don't you?

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    4. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i agree exactly.

      but...are they spending a disproportinate (sp? its early) amount of resources on finding a CD? it sure sounds that way.

      lets put it this way, how much effort/money/priority are they putting on this case compared to a rape or a murder of some random person.

      they are not simply gonna brush off the latter, but how can the former get so much attention.

    5. Re:Priorities by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I just realized how screwed up this world really is. A major police operation has been launch to find a CD. Aparantly all other crimes have been defeated.

      Yeah, it's a good thing that the article noted the French police had stopped investigating all other crimes, because otherwise I'd have to accuse the parent of jumping to a conclusion.

      To quote a sibling poster--perhaps they can investigate more than one crime at any given time.

      Another sibling has noted that this disc represents years of work and thousands of dollars of effort--physically it's a fifty eurocent CD-R, but from a business standpoint it's worth quite a bit.

      To add my own two cents...I notice whenever a NASA program is cancelled (or proposed) there appears a troll who will comment that NASA doesn't deserve funding because government should have other priorities (health research, education, and so forth). Space exploration, after all, should receive funding only after all the other problems have been solved. Staunch defenders of NASA will leap into the breach, arguing (rightly) that government can have multiple priorities and many projects. Similarly, I want police to solve murders, but that doesn't mean I don't want them to investigate theft, vandalism, or white-collar crimes.

      Finally, my understanding is that the level of violent crime in France is quite a bit lower than the rate in the United States...not to be petty (well, maybe a little bit) but perhaps they really are running out of other crimes to investigate....

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you people don't get it. This isn't a huge priority to anyone that is why they sent the French to investigate it.

  72. IP is a wasting asset by siriuskase · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The faster you get it out, the more it's worth, but the minute it's out, it will start losing value almost immediately due to the ease of duplication. It would be a shame for them to lose out by not being first to market with their own album. By recognizing the way the music market works, they will give fans who prefer a nice clean "legit" version the option of being able to buy it.

    IP of all sorts will get copied in spite of all the DRM and other crippling technology people can devise. It's not just music, if we can't prevent kids from downloading in rich countries, how can we expect to prevent motivated adults in countries without a history of IP protection from duplicating. In China, they clone cars , that's surely not frictionless. Someday, IP of all sorts will be marketed like other perishables with a finite shelf life. Copyright and trademark laws will need to adapt to this reality.

    Musicians and Authors will be like Engineers and Programmers and Farmers, if they want to live off their IP, they will need to keep producing more of it. Which was kinda the whole point of IP laws in the first place

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    1. Re:IP is a wasting asset by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      IP is a wasting asset. The faster you get it out, the more it's worth, but the minute it's out, it will start losing value almost immediately due to the ease of duplication.

      No, it's not. *Data* is a rapidlly depreciating asset. IP is designed to prevent this depreciation phenomenon from happening -- it allows laws to be made to prevent people from copying data.

    2. Re:IP is a wasting asset by dave420 · · Score: 1

      You're using freerepublic.com as a source in your post. I've spokent to a bunch of guys from that site in person, and they're racist, selfish assholes, fyi. Kinda like citing kukluxklan.org - not very good for your credibility.

    3. Re:IP is a wasting asset by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Since you don't seem to know IP is Intellectual Property which includes data of all sorts such as music, patents, copyrights, etc. It is not a system for making laws in this or any other context. Laws are made to protect IP because it is easy to duplicate. But IP laws don't cross national boundaries and some countries don't recognize the concept of IP at all. Therefore, I suggest that people who produce IP look at it as any other asset with a shelf life.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    4. Re:IP is a wasting asset by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I googled for the car article and that was the one on the list that got to the point the quickest. Only after I posted the link, did I bother surfing the rest of the site. Live and learn.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    5. Re:IP is a wasting asset by dave420 · · Score: 1

      exactly :)

    6. Re:IP is a wasting asset by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Since you don't seem to know IP is Intellectual Property which includes data of all sorts such as music, patents, copyrights, etc.

      IP is a system designed to produce artificial scarcity of data. The rationale is that there normally is no funding system in place to encourage the creation of new data, and that the creation of new data is a desirable goal. Thus, artificial scarcity was introduced, which allows
      our free market and other commodity-oriented economic models to work as a mechanism to allow data creation to be funded.

      Data itself can be distributed. Data doesn't really have dollar values associated with it, inherently, because it is not property. Only when it is classified as IP does it do so, and IP specifically attempts to protect data against loss of value from distribution.

    7. Re:IP is a wasting asset by siriuskase · · Score: 1
      IP is a system designed to produce artificial scarcity of data.

      Hence the obvious acronym. You are defending an argument that can't be defended.

      IP laws are designed to encourage a creator to release his IP to the world by providing a means to enforce his right to be compensated.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  73. This looks like flamebait, but it's true. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    This is because The Smashing Pumpkins are cool and Billy Corgan isn't a tool who's all about the money but actually loves the music, and.. U2 are a bunch of money grabbing whores who pretend to be all about peace and love but couldn't really give a shit.

    1. Re:This looks like flamebait, but it's true. by kongjie · · Score: 1

      Well, you probably didn't read the reasons why the Pumpkins did what they did. It wasn't coz they didn't care about the money, it was because it was the last straw in their frustrating relationship with their label. Kind of, um, completely different from the U2 situation.

  74. Requisite ancient saying. by the+HIM · · Score: 1

    Even if you know a thousand things, ask the man who knows one.

  75. That'll show em! by Cyberllama · · Score: 1

    Erm wait. . . How will this show them again? This seems like a pretty empty threat. Are they under the impression that pirates care if the song is available for sale or not?

    I'm not saying this isn't a smart move in that it might sway die-hard U2 fans (if there is such a thing) from the temptation of downloading the tracks from kazaa early -- though I bet most of them who did download them for free early would still buy the cd anyways. . .

    Still, I hardly see how this qualifies as news, or why this seems to be worded as an ultimatum to the pirates.

  76. I'd buy it by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    just because I'm fed up with crappy rips, incomplete songs, and screwed up tags to even bother with p2p anymore.

    The ONLY reason I've used p2p at all recently is because I heard some bands on Snake Net Metal Radio (one of the iTunes radio stations) and I wanted to hear at least 1 or 2 other songs by the bands (Nightwish, in this case) - I said "Hey, decent band!" and went out and bought 2 of their CDs, and plan to buy more.

    So, this could very well work.. and p2p can serve as a great way to find new bands. I never thought it could happen, but it came along for me.

    Oh, and porn. I wish that there was iTunes for porno flicks. Oh yeah.

    1. Re:I'd buy it by AvantLegion · · Score: 2, Funny
      >> Oh, and porn. I wish that there was iTunes for porno flicks. Oh yeah.

      iPoon?

      I'm racing to trademark the name...

    2. Re:I'd buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like Snake Net, try Chronix Aggression
      www.chronixradio.com

      I went from Snakenet to Chronix a few months ago.
      If I could get this station in my car I would be set.

      It's amazing how your CD buying habits change when you actually get to hear good music.

    3. Re:I'd buy it by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      Better trademark iYank, iJerk and iWhack also...

  77. You don't get it by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    feh

    1. Re:You don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      way to use your +1 bonus to push your stupid pro Ann Coulter blog.


      you asshead

    2. Re:You don't get it by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward. 'Nuff said.

  78. let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rich guy #1 (in office) doesn't give a SHIT about you, unless your ass is WEALTHY. All he cares about is making himself, and other millionaires, RICHER. They will lie, cheat and steal --- not just from you, but from your mother, father, brothers and sisters, ESPECIALLY anyone who is POOR. He and his cronies will not stop there. They DO NOT care about this country's people, except for the Very, VERY WEALTHY. Such is the nature of many (but not all) REPUBLICANS.

    Rich guy #2 acually cares about the poor people of the nation. So what if he's rich -- running for office takes money --- DUH. Democrats in general tend to care more about PEOPLE than $$Dollar Signs. What does that mean? It means that they tend to care more about giving money to schools than to the military to rip us off ($500 for a toilet seat, anyone?). If our nation's minimum wage ever gets raised, it won't be by a Republican --- they're OWNED by big business. And there are many, many other reasons people should vote Democratic. I like Nader for some reasons, but you have to realize...

    A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush. It counds AGAINST the Democrats.
    Sometimes it's not about voting for the candidate you like the most.
    It's about voting for the candidate who actually stands a chance of BEATING the one you DISlike the most.

    1. Re:let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To be young and naive.

      Rich guy #2 pretends to care about the poor. It is a gimmick to get him elected.

      A vote for Nader is a vote for Nader. If there is enough votes for a third party canidate, that party just might have a chance to be taken seriously. There might be a chance that the political scene may be shaken up a bit.

      If you just keep voting against canidates, you will accomplish nothing. I've tried it and I won't do it again.

    2. Re:let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you just keep voting against canidates, you will accomplish nothing. I've tried it and I won't do it again."

      Why, Didnt it work the first time ? Twat.

    3. Re:let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Obviously, it didn't. Moron.

      If you vote for one shithead just because you don't like the other shithead, you still get a shithead in office.

    4. Re:let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you guys are ape nosed niggers.

      snoogins!

    5. Re:let me explain it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      morons like you make democracy dangerous

  79. I pity their legal team... by the_illuminatus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...which is forced to ALWAYS work pro bono...

    --
    knee-jerk? check. post? check. okay, time to read the article.
  80. U2 is threatening... me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking terrorists.

  81. They ought to release "rights" now... by iabervon · · Score: 1

    What they should do is offer people the opportunity to buy a legitimate copy of the album in advance of the album actually being released. If you do the pre-order, you're also cleared to download the leaked version if you're impatient. If the reason to release the album early is to give fans a chance to pay for it when they first hear it, they might as well give the fans that chance without rushing the distribution channels. If both are available at the same time, the reason to buy it from iTunes instead of downloading it from P2P is to have the right to have it, not because Apple's packets are somehow more pleasing than other people's. So there's no reason not to sell the right to have a copy without actually distributing a copy at the time, if the customer is willing to make their own arrangements until the album is officially released.

  82. Brilliant marketing campaign by spisska · · Score: 1

    I think this is actually part of a planned campaign, and if you think about it for a minute or two, it's brilliant. There's not really any reason they would need a rough mix of their album to do a photo shoot. I suppose they might want the photographer, art director, or whomever to hear it to get a feel for the music before snapping photos, but there are other ways of doing that. Playing their new tunes before a photo shoot sounds a bit more like a garage band with a decent first-time-in-the-studio recording rather than an international blockbuster act. So what's the gimmick? U2 says the rough mix was stolen and if it shows up on P2P, they'll rush it out on ITMS -- weeks before the CD will show up down at the Sam Goody. Which means it will be online first, and legally. There's lots of U2 fans who will buy this record as soon as they can, and don't much care about the format, so long as it can be burned. There are some who will just copy it, but many people will pay because they know it's the right thing to do. By releasing releasing early only on ITMS, they'll be reap all the profits the CD would (at least for a few weeks), while cutting out CD, burning, printing, distribution, and stocking costs. These costs are not insubstantial, but they are a bit out of whack. If you look at CD production costs, you will notice that there are three elements (not counting time and labor): 1) physical disc; 2) jewel case; 3) printed cover. Of these, the most expensive is the paper cover; the cheapest is the disc. The publicity from the theft story gets them loads of coverage over several weeks, also providing convenient details about how to buy the goods. U2 may be on to something here. 1) Create buzz with free coverage in world media (here's where the obligatory ?????? comes in) 2) Make product available only through download, cutting out a great deal of manufacturing expense 3) Profit 4) After delay, release product in lower-margin physical form 5) Profit more

  83. Re:Threat? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "I don't understand the threatening nature of the band's proposal to immediately make the album available on iTunes and later in stores when it is finished. Can someone explain ?"

    I believe that was Slashdot's idea of sarcasm. Judging from the comments I've skimmed so far, U2 is not well liked here.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  84. I'll tell you why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I can.
    Besides, setting your ass straight wasn't worth creating an account over. Stupid prick.

    1. Re:I'll tell you why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For Your Information because you like to suck COCK. If you create an account maybe you can suck even more CUMQUAT!!!!!!!!

  85. Off Topic: Re:This is ashame by ibookman · · Score: 0
    --
    -- Blah blah blah... are you still listening?
    1. Re:Off Topic: Re:This is ashame by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      About as much as your government does. At least Moore has the excuse of creative freedom.

  86. Re:Threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Err I don't think I made that clear enough. I think the sarcasm is something like:

    "George Lucas threatens to release Episode III", nobody is exactly pumped about seeing it so...

    NG

  87. Summary of new U2 Album by spezz · · Score: 5, Funny
    To save you the trouble of downloading it (pay or free):

    1. war is bad
    2. the common man is good
    3. we'd like another stadium tour now, please

    1. Re:Summary of new U2 Album by zoid.com · · Score: 1

      What? War was their best album!!

    2. Re:Summary of new U2 Album by cybrthng · · Score: 1

      [blockquote]
      What? War was their best album!!
      [/blockquote]

      Uhm... War as in "war" not the album labeled war :)

      You know - death, bombs, genocide, hitler and shit

    3. Re:Summary of new U2 Album by jmbauer · · Score: 1

      You forgot about how God is complex and ambivalent.

  88. No, no, no! by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    That story is wrong! The truth is that U2 has delayed their album a year because they have to change the security measures on the album so that hackers won't be able to use the stolen version to write quick cheats.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  89. Threatened? Vowed? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about a simple "said"?
    There is no justification for the emotive terms "threatened" or "vowed".

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Threatened? Vowed? by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      It's kind of off topic but in third grade my teacher tried to get the class off the generic words "run" and "said." Those do have more emotion than news would like but do you want fifty copies of "said" in each article or a variety of words?

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
    2. Re:Threatened? Vowed? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      I want words that accurately describe what's happening. They aren't trying to intimidate anyone nor are they making a solemn promise or pledge.
      They are simply stating what they will do should a certain circumstance arrive.

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  90. American Idol... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Chairboy should be on American Idol. He might be the next William Hung! ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  91. Two more words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. Shit.

  92. What? by Daetrin · · Score: 1
    However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law. Having acquired the music, the fan will be less likely to pay for it when it is released legally.

    The lesson here is that U2 has crappy fans?

    When Rush was about to release Vapor Trails a year or two ago, i happened to find mp3s of the complete album a month or so before it hit stores on a P2P network. I had actually been looking for older Rush mp3s and was suprised but very excited to find the new ones as well.

    I downloaded the mp3s, spent a few weeks listening to them at work, and then bought the CD the first week it was out.

    At the time i don't remember Rush complaining about the mp3s being out there. They certainly didn't move their release date because of it. And as a solitary representative of their fans, i at least did not feel less inclined to go out and buy the album. So what's up with U2 and their fans?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  93. here is a spectacular idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make music that doesnt suck ass, and maybe folks will buy it.

    the record industry is in the toilet because rap/hippy-hop/talentless morons , whatever the hell you want to call it is horrendous. it only caters to 10 year olds and a few folks who are tone deaf.

    until they realize this, they will continue to lose revenue and customers.

  94. Hmmm.. Theory.. by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen Steve Jobs and Bono at the same place? Could they be the same........ Nah.....

  95. Re:YES YOU FUCKING HOMOSEXUAL by name773 · · Score: 0

    homer: A grammy?! but i want an award that's worth winning!

    scrolling text: Warning: homer simpson does not represent the views and opinions of the writers of the simpsons, who do not consider the grammy an award.

  96. Re:Threat? by luxojr · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether they're liked, it seems that the intent, at least IMHO, has been misunderstood. It seems to me that if their work is indeed released on P2P in the near future, then they, like any other band signed to a major record label, have a choice of either letting every fan download it illegally (which would be more than usual since it can't/won't be released on CD for months) or immediately offer it on iTMS where they have a hope of getting some revenue for their work.

    It doesn't seem so much a threat as it does a simple, well meaning and fairly savvy move to try & recoup some revenue from their work, should it become available on P2P.

    Normally honest fans might be enticed to illegally download the album just to hear it if they can't have a legal alternative for months. I don't understand how this move, in any way, can be construed as negative. They are trying to make the best of a bad situation for them by embracing a viable and legal alternative that promotes a modern distribution method. And it might set a precedent. Suppose it does hit P2P and they do release it on iTMS. This would be the first major album released online only (for the time being). And maybe they sold alot. And maybe they, and many others, realized that bands that are already 'made', have no need for the RIAA and can go to iTMS directly and make alot more money. It's a scenario that is just waiting to happen. Someone willdo it - be it U2, Bowie or whoever. And that will be the real death knoll for the RIAA.

  97. U2 by darnoc · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to know is that a threat Bono, or a promise? The last thing I'm interested in hearing is a new U2 album. Ugh! No offense to the fans, but its my kind of muzak.

  98. abyss of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIM IM with shatteredfurby
    12:18 AM
    nickslikesmen: i heard you submerged your long hard ship full of seamen into buttlovers abyss of shit last night
    shattered furby: Where'd you hear that?
    shattered furby: Did frankie tell you that?
    shattered furby: Well it's true.

  99. stupid obligatory post... by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1
    Ok... Music. Data. Bits. I O. perfect copy.

    TV. corporeal. Mass. replaceable by a different item, only.

    please, tho this is not me condoning it, copyright violation is not stealing someone's property. It is acquiring a perfect copy of intellectual property through shady means.

    1. Re:stupid obligatory post... by name773 · · Score: 1

      some character in mash: oh "stole" is such a harsh word. i prefer "creatively acquired" :)

    2. Re:stupid obligatory post... by redivider · · Score: 1

      So by that logic, if the technology were available to create perfect copies of physical materials (as opposed to more intangible things like music and software), then it wouldn't be stealing to walk into a store with a "perfect copy maker" (or whatever it ends up being called) and just making copies of everything you want.. instead of buying them. I realize this is sort of a ridiculous argument, but it all has to do with what technology will allow you to easily do and whether or not that still constitutes "stealing," since it's technically not the same as the traditional definition of stealing - taking someone elses property. As technology evolves, the way we define stealing (among other things) needs to evolve as well.

      --
      Sinch
  100. One link by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    ed2k://|file|U2.-.Vertigo.-03.mp3|4077454|C3F4C577 AE20995628BE34603ADC7E39|/

  101. Heh Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Made you look!

  102. Screw You and Our Fans Too by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "After a rough cut of U2's latest unfinished album was stolen earlier this week, the band has vowed to release the entire album on iTunes if the music appears on P2P networks."

    ...Yeah, and????

    I mean, is that a threat? Because I truely am baffled. "By golly, since somebody stole our copy, we'll release the entire damn thing on iTunes!" Ok, so we're going to punish the large majority of our innocent fanbase who still easily outnumber the .mp3 wired, deny ourselves a huge revenue stream and put it strait to digital format so the pirates don't have to work too hard to get it.

    Aside from the potential bonus of making iTunes more popular, there's no freakin' logic to this action. Millions of people who have never downloaded a song in their lives are being cut out of the loop for.... Uh, what was that reasoning again???

    Yeah... You go U2. Show em who's boss. ^_^

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Screw You and Our Fans Too by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Who the hell gave monkeys mod points today?

      You can't see the logic in them not wanting unfinished digital copies floating around? They don't care about piracy, (in fact they have a history of not minding) they care about their longtime fans downloading one of the unmastered, unfinished songs and thinking "Holy Jesus this is awful, there's no freaking way I'm going to see them live now."

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:Screw You and Our Fans Too by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      "You can't see the logic in them not wanting unfinished digital copies floating around?"

      Ok, and what does that have to do with releasing the finished version only on iTunes?? Fine, they don't want rough copies on the internet. SO WTF DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH A LIMITED RELEASE THAT PURPOSELY EXCLUDES THE LARGER MAJORITY OF CD BUYING FANS??!??! I wouldn't want my unfinished crap all over the net either, but freakin 'A' does not equal 'B' here. You don't like drafts on the net, fine, but tighten security on your recording sessions and find the leak, NOT SCREW YOUr FANBASE OVER by only releasing the finished product over a medium that caters to a small percentage of people who listen to your music! A DIGITAL MEDIUM, YOU FUCKING CHIMP! They might as well have posted it on Kazaa themfuckingselves!

      Besides, if they are long time fans listening to rough, uncut masters, dontcha think they'd know it? Dontcha think that maybe- just maybe! -That the people you're describing know what a finished product sounds like????? A rough cut isn't going to make a shit of difference to these fans.

      Fucking spider monkey.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    3. Re:Screw You and Our Fans Too by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you bothered to read the article, you reactionary twit, you would have seen that there would have still BEEN a CD release, just that the iTunes release would have come first to try and trump the unfinished rough cuts.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  103. I found it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already available here, but please don't click and slashdot the site.

  104. Yeah, U2gate by Donny+Smith · · Score: 0

    While you were thinking up the conspiracy theory you could have downloaded the album.

    ed2k://|file|U2.-.Vertigo.-03.mp3|4077454|C3F4C5 77 AE20995628BE34603ADC7E39|/

    1. Re:Yeah, U2gate by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      The file is a fake, oops!

  105. Mod up! by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    +1, Insightful

    Huzzah for major bands being more important than violent criminals.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  106. What Is The Worry? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know if anyone attempted to use Kazaa lately. But 98% of anything I download off Kazaa has been decrypted with an annoying buzz noise. You can't even get songs off Kazaa P2P anymore.

    And sharezilla sucks, everyone I know who installed it has gotten blue screens of death. Is there a linux P2P alternative? There, U2 shouldn't worry.

    1. Re:What Is The Worry? by meowsqueak · · Score: 2, Informative

      mldonkey is good.

    2. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhh ;)

    3. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kazaa is dead, it has been since the RIAA injected those fake files into the network and virus/worm/trojan writers have dicovered it as a nice distribution platform for their malware.

      I don't know of any linux alternative, but i have been using WinMX for a couple of months now. It's windows only as the name implies :-( but i think it's much better than kazaa has ever been, specially for movies.

    4. Re:What Is The Worry? by meowsqueak · · Score: 2, Funny

      oops, sorry! :(

    5. Re:What Is The Worry? by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      try emule i find it to be quite free of those corrupted songs.

    6. Re:What Is The Worry? by internewt · · Score: 1
      I don't know if anyone attempted to use Kazaa lately. But 98% of anything I download off Kazaa has been decrypted with an annoying buzz noise. You can't even get songs off Kazaa P2P anymore.
      And sharezilla sucks, everyone I know who installed it has gotten blue screens of death. Is there a linux P2P alternative? There, U2 shouldn't worry.

      Ubernet. No more shit quality MP3s. We use direct connect, so Linux clients can be used (though the rest of the SW used is Windows only).

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    7. Re:What Is The Worry? by grainofsand · · Score: 1

      Try soulseek. Clean interface, intelligent community and an amazing array of material available. No spyware / adware.

      www.slsknet.org

      --
      A dream is good. A plan is better.
    8. Re:What Is The Worry? by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      I use Direct Connect. www.neo-modus.com. Really a good site. I've never touched Kazaa with a ten-foot pole. Too much false shite.

    9. Re:What Is The Worry? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Use e-mule or e-donkey or one of the clones. It's OSS and you can get clients for a variety of platforms. It also supports file hashing, so you can see links to validated downloads at sites such as this one.

      I run it on Windows XP with the E-mule plus client. Very stable, the box is only rebooted after Windows Updates.

      There are java versions available, so you should get it to run on anything. The protocol it uses is very clever. Say there is a file in three parts, A, B & C. If you have 10 sources available with only parts A & B, and connect to a host with all three parts, it will go for part C automatically. Which you then share with the other users looking for part C, giving you "credits" on their host, leading to you having a higher priority in their queue. Those who give something back get more.

      Also, when you connect to someone also looking for the same file, you exchange the sources you both have for it.

      It's also essentially serverless, though there is a branch with a new version that is literally serverless.

    10. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I buy legal downloads from iTunes quite frequently. However if I do need an individual song I go with Limewire, a Gnutella client. It's java based so it'll run on any platform, and I've never gotten a corrupted song on it

    11. Re:What Is The Worry? by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why yes. There is a Linux alternative. It is called Apollon.

      Actually there are quite a lot of them- go to sourceforge and do a search of P2P. It will list quite a few.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    12. Re:What Is The Worry? by john+barleycorn · · Score: 1

      Try indietorrents

      Its all super HQ and RIAA free music to boot.

    13. Re:What Is The Worry? by nystagmus · · Score: 1

      The combination of suprnova.org and bittorrent work well for me, as well as the combination of ircspy.com and irc.

      DC++ is also nice.

    14. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soulseek is pretty good, and you can get both windows and linux clients, just google it

    15. Re:What Is The Worry? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > 98% of anything I download off Kazaa has been decrypted with an annoying buzz noise.

      Maybe we are looking for different types of music, but I haven't downloaded a fake or buzzed song off of KaZaA for at least a month. Of course, I don't usually download radio music.

    16. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is there a linux P2P alternative?
      giFT?
    17. Re:What Is The Worry? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Yes, hook yourself up with Azureus, and head on over to suprnova.org. You can download correctly-tagged MP3/Ogg/Flac/Monkey full albums, in bittorrent form. Fastest and highest quality free music available :)

    18. Re:What Is The Worry? by quis · · Score: 1

      I find it a little more time-consuming to actually get songs (more likely to be in a queue), but I've never had a corrupted file using eMule.

    19. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try using Shareaza or Warez... i left Kazza along time ago...

      http://www.shareaza.com/

    20. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I don't know if anyone attempted to use Kazaa lately. But 98% of anything I download off Kazaa has been decrypted with an annoying buzz noise. You can't even get songs off Kazaa P2P anymore. And sharezilla sucks, everyone I know who installed it has gotten blue screens of death. Is there a linux P2P alternative?"

      Download bittorrent and go to www.suprnova.org.

      Have a nice day.

    21. Re:What Is The Worry? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Try apollon. Uses giFT to connect to multiple p2p networks, easy installer, very nice UI with the more recent versions, and seems to have some way of avoiding the riaa fake versions. Certainly I've never got a fake off it.

      --
      I am trolling
    22. Re:What Is The Worry? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      A clarification - Apollon is just a KDE front-end for giFT daemon, which itself is a multiprotocol P2P core (and implements a network of its own, called OpenFT). There are many giFT frontends available, my own favorites being giFTcurs (ncurses-based frontend), and giFToxic (GTK+ frontend).

      Now I just wish giFT's UI protocol would be propely standardized and that other P2P cores would use it - because mldonkey is my P2P core of choice and the mldonkey's "native" GUIs somewhat stink. mldonkey folks are apparently already implementing giFT frontend support, just hoping it'll be some day considered a non-experimental feature...

    23. Re:What Is The Worry? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1
    24. Re:What Is The Worry? by Optikal · · Score: 1

      GTK-Gnutella, and of course Azureus for BitTorrent.

    25. Re:What Is The Worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one very impressive P2P app that I would have never known about if it wasn't for slashdot.

    26. Re:What Is The Worry? by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1
      Is there a linux P2P alternative?
      Yes. My favorite is GiFT which can connect to Gnutella, OpenFT, and FastTrack (if you want). It has some excellent front ends, Apollon being my favorite. There is also GTK-Gnutella, a good GTK Gnutella client. aMule is nice, too, though I think the client needs more work.

      There's a ton of other Gnutella clients for Linux, and some are really quite good.
      --
      #include "sig.h"
  107. Un-fucking believable! by 1337+Twinkie · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though, Bono may be insane, but this may work for them. Nowadays, people would rather buy music than download it illegaly, if given a choice. Besides, the stolen version is unfinished. I think that most fans would rather buy a GOOD version, rather than run the risk of being sued over a crappy one.

    1. Re:Un-fucking believable! by cspaz · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I wouldn't want an unmixed, unmastered CD from any band, especially if I liked said band enough to want their CD before it hit stores.

  108. I am insane by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I read that and I heard it in Kasey Kasems voice.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I am insane by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Every so often I put that Negativeland track into my main playlist. Life gets weird for a while, then I take it out again.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  109. yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're taking what was said too literally. Running the country involves making decisions about where our money is spent. (Tax cuts for the rich who don't need them, or for the poor, who do?) It's about more than people providing for their own families --- Do you have any idea how hard it is for some people to simply make ends meet? Look at how low minumum wage is. In most cases, it barely keeps people out of poverty.

    1. Re:yes and no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If there are going to be tax cuts, they should be equal across the board. I believe that people shouldn't be penalized just because they have made a lot of money.

      I know it isn't always easy to make ends meet. Unfortunately, most of the people I know that have problems making ends meet also are terrible at managing money. Granted, it is easier to manage money when you have some.

  110. U2 = Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so which moron thought it would be funny to take a pre-release work-in-progress to a photo shoot? Bands are very careful about locking these kinds of things up. Taking the thing to a photo shoot was hardly a responsible thing to do.

  111. I don't know what they're worried about by akuzi · · Score: 1

    The same thing happened to Radiohead's last album "Hail to the Thief", if anything it just caused more buzz and free publicity for the album.

    People who are going to download the album, are going to download it, whether it's meant to be out or not.

  112. Re:What? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are, as you said, a solitary representative. Do you think every person who downloaded those files went out and bought the album the first week it came out? Probably not. Probably quite a few of them intended to buy the album, but they didn't quite have the money, or they saw something in the store they liked better, or they decided that the songs really weren't that great after all... for whatever reason, because they were able to download the songs before they were able to buy them, Rush lost a sale. Why didn't Rush complain? They probably didn't want to let everyone know that the songs were available on P2P.

    --
    I am NOT a man!
    I am a free number!
  113. Um, yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fans want to hear the album early, so over-zealous fan snags copy of album in advance... ...so band retaliates by threatening to release album early?

    Waaaaah???

  114. speaking of that Smashing Pumpkins... by CaptainPinko · · Score: 1

    do anybody know a good place to get that album? a torrent/ftp perhaps?

    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
    1. Re:speaking of that Smashing Pumpkins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.billy-corgan.com/downloads/mp3/machina2 /index.php

      Other good stuff here as well.

  115. Re:Even Even worse threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It couldve been another Metallica album

  116. Re:What? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
    The lesson here is that U2 has crappy fans?

    No, the lesson here is that people suck, and U2 has to cater to people. A quick Google says their last album sold over 10 million copies. Do you expect even a big percentage of them to have the nobility of spirit to wait for the legal release, or the fanaticism to pay for something they already downloaded?

    And as a solitary representative of their fans, i at least did not feel less inclined to go out and buy the album.

    Good for you, and I mean it. Now how many people do you know would do the same, compared to how many who would not?

  117. Correct, and there's more ... by zonix · · Score: 3, Informative

    [...] they used P2P as the *only* way to release the album.

    Correct. Billy Corgan stated it was a personal "fuck you" to Virgin Records for preventing them in releasing the album. It was then they stopped as the band Smashing Pumpkins, to which BC said it wasn't because of issues within the band internally, but that they were tired of competing with "all the Britney Spearses out there" (something like that).

    All this makes the album title quite interesting: "Machina II - Friends and Enemies of Modern Music".

    IMO, what they did was very commendable given the circumstances. Thanks Billy and friends for releasing the album!

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Correct, and there's more ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > they were tired of competing with "all the Britney Spearses out there" (something like that)

      In other words, it's not fun when you're not popular anymore.

    2. Re:Correct, and there's more ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a sheep you are. The Smashing Pumpkins are nothing more than another bunch of pop whiners interested in making money. They are not? Oh, then come they have all that money and why do you hear them on the radio all the time? That's right, they are *popular* -- which means they suck. By definition, if you are heard on the radio, then you've already lost any real artistic sense. If you were really into supporting music, you'd be supporting the guys trying to make it in the local pub every weekend. Now that's real music. Not this Smashing Pumpkins sheeple nonsense

    3. Re:Correct, and there's more ... by zonix · · Score: 1

      What a sheep you are.

      I resent that! I don't listen to the radio at all, and I don't like popular music at all. Smashing Pumpkins are from my wild MTV youth high school days. I'm sure you've been there yourself.

      FYI, I support both independent artists and labels directly (as in pay them $$$). Electronic artists from the demo scene, deep ambient artists, that sort.

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    4. Re:Correct, and there's more ... by semafour · · Score: 1

      It was then they stopped as the band Smashing Pumpkins, to which BC said it wasn't because of issues within the band internally, but that they were tired of competing with "all the Britney Spearses out there" (something like that).

      He would later take tha statement back as mostly a joke. He posted on his site:

      "Many times I hid things to protect my band mates...for example, its been almost 4 years since I went on my friend tami's radio show and announced that the pumpkins were breaking up...that day, when she asked why we were breaking up, I said something silly like 'I'm tired of fighting britney blah blah'...and it went on to be widely quoted, as if I was breaking up my love, my band, because of some pop star...13 years of my life, and you know, let's pack it in cause their teeth are whiter...by saying that, I was seen as someone who was crying foul, taking his ball, and going home...which was sad cause it wans't true at all...The truth of the matter is is that james iha broke up the smashing pumpkins...not me, not jimmy, but james...did it help that d'arcy was fired for being a mean spirited drug addict, who refused to get help? No, that didn't help keep the band together, not at all...it made it very hard to go on, but we soldier! ed thru it even though our hearts were broken...But d'arcy didn't break up the band, we didn't let her...and jimmy didn't want to break up the band, not at that time...and I would have gone on forever...the smashing pumpkins were essentially my entire life...a dream I still believe in...many friends at that time suggested letting james leave, so jimmy and I could continue on under the name...but I was too loyal to the man I had started the whole thing with, and I protected him until the very end...right up until the last show on dec 2, 2000, when he thanked d'arcy on stage, but not the 2 men standing next to him...and I was loyal until he left the metro without even saying goodbye, or an 'its been great boys!', or a simple 'I love you' to us...no, james iha left the metro that night without saying goodbye to the 2 people he had won and lost and traveled the world with...so I won't be protecting him anymore...and I won't be protecting a whole lot of other people anymore...not because I don't love them (I do!!) but because ! I love myself too...I want to say one more thing, and that is I appreciate you reading this...+I want to remind you that I love you...God has given me the strength to say that to you, and I hope that you don't hide who you are...does it make me sad that I have hid myself all these years? No, it was what I had to do to survive, or at least what I 'thought' I needed to do...but surviving is not enough...we all deserve to flourish, and to know happiness and joy...that is my new dream...the smashing pumpkins gave me that, and I am eternally grateful...especially to those that shared in the dream with me...even if you bought just one cd, or came to a show, you gave us that chance...we thank you for that...even if we don't always know how to show it...be well!!"

    5. Re:Correct, and there's more ... by Arkaein · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because "pop whiners interested in making money" regularly raise $2.3 million for charity (look at the July 1998 entry).

      I saw them live in downtown Minneapolis that same summer, where they gave a FREE outdoor concert to over 100,000 people.

  118. Re:Dear Slime-dogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just googled and could only find 3 mp3 sites for downloading (I only learnt about this album just now).

    Could you possibly post a link or two to some sites with the cd quality vinyl rips?

    Thanks heaps :)

  119. Who are they threatening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I am thinking about the title: U2 Threatens to Release Album Early on iTunes. Exactly, who are they threatening?

    The thief? How does the thief feel so punished that they won't release it on P2P network? Do they care if others get to buy it online? Here is the news for U2: They already got you stuff, they don't give a damn about others!!

    The fans? Riiight... the chance of buying U2 songs before the official release makes them scared and line up at the malls for the actual CD.

    iTunes Music Store? Give them the chance to sell songs. That'll scare them. Yeah!

    The record company? Will releasing the songs on iTunes scare them enough to sic lawyers to the thief? They will sic lawyers to anybody and his dog given a chance. No need to scare them.

    The non-fans? OK, you got me there. We are scared of U2 releasing more songs. Please, someone, anyone... make them stop.

  120. Re:Threat? by jazzer · · Score: 1
    I believe that was Slashdot's idea of sarcasm. Judging from the comments I've skimmed so far, U2 is not well liked here.

    Which is kind of odd, given that the approximate age group that would read slashdot would be fans of U2. Maybe, it's because U2 fans don't see the point in acting stark raving mad about their own opinions of the band.. ;)

    Now the real question is, will U2 feel the Slashdot Effect?

  121. Crybabies by woom · · Score: 1

    This simply shows one thing, they are a bunch of crybabies. They've made more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime, and this new record means nothing to them economically. So if they weren't spoiled little brats, they'd just go along with their recording and release the album as planned. ...unless they know it's a pile of crap. Then they got the perfect excuse: "Yes, we do know these songs are rubbish but that's because we where forced to release them in an unfinished state. It's your own fault, you potential pirate you"...

  122. Re:Pink Floyd - Wilco by shakey_deal · · Score: 1
    Remeber Wilco-Yankee Hotel Foxtrot? Similar thing that U2 is up against. Reprise refused to release Wilcos album. Everyone plus dog downloaded and yet it became a best seller. And it build up a massive hype long before it found its way to the stores. If it is any good people will buy it.

    Another album that was out in the wild long before getting a real release was the last Whiskeytown-album. Im not sure how it sold though

    "Meanwhile/finally, Reprise, Wilco's label, rejected the album, sparking a long search to find a new home for the band. Complaints abounded over the bizarre, noise driven elements of many YHF tracks. Songs leaked out online got a massive hype, and Nonesuch Records (owned by Warner) released YHF in 2001. Ironically, it reached #12 on the Billboard album charts, Wilco's highest chart position to that date and also charting in Australia."

  123. Re:This is ashame by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Who knows, they might never make an album again out of frustration...

    Bad example. You need to show that there is a down side to piracy.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  124. And what about the rest of the world? by houghi · · Score: 1

    So what if they put it on iTunes? People still have to copy it, if they want to get it online. From the iTunes site:
    Purchases from the iTunes Music Store are available in the United States, France, Germany and United Kingdom
    So not even their Irish fans can download it, let alone the rest of the world.

    So IF I were interested in downloading it, I would have to choose bteeen P2P or moving to another country. Mmmm. (And I am not even talking about the fact that I run Linux, wich is not supported by iTunes.)

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  125. Maybe a PR stunt, but... by CdotZinger · · Score: 1
    What got snatched (according to the story) wouldn't be a promo copy of the future release, but a rough, some-degree-of-unfinished CD-R version that was made just for the band members and/or studio guys to listen to, for them to find not-immediately-obvious mistakes that need to be fixed, or to test a running order for the tracks before it gets mastered, or it's for the record company to pick a single from so they know what song to spend all their post-production time tinkering with, or it's a goofy mix with all the vocals too loud so Bono could see if his takes are all keepers, or...it could be a million things.


    Anyone who likes U2 enough to buy their album at its release date would download this version, think it was neat, add it to their collection, then go out and buy the real album anyway. This is not a problem for sales, and the press coverage will only help. Before this story, I had no idea U2 still existed (last one I bought was Unforgettable Fire).

    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  126. Who cares by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    So U2 are releasing yet another disk full of filler, and they're sorry that people are going to pirate it, hear that it's crap, and not buy it.

    They're threatening us that they're going to release it on itunes? Why is this a threat?

    U2 aren't quite horrid, but they've been in a slump since about 1986.

    The only thing P2P endruns is the marketing machinery that takes pablum and shoves it down peoples' throats by brainwashing them that it's excellent music. The truth is, there's so much music out there that the fanbases have fragmented. Why should groups like U2 be able to make jackloads of cash when there are 9999999++ other bands hungrier, edgier and more original?

    Get off your high horse, Bono, and make something good that can make a splash-- if you can. U2 are nothing without their marketing machine.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
  127. U2 is the biggest band in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U2 is the biggest band in the world

  128. You like it because it's AMERICAN band! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't push it! You're saying R.E.M. is a good band ONLY BECAUSE rapid eye movement is a band that comes from USA! This is so stupid. Michael Moore should visit you!

  129. Tough shit. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    If they don't know what they're doing, they shouldn't be downloading random stuff from the internet.

  130. Oi bitch! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    The *English* are pompous and annoying. We're not. We don't like the English either.

  131. In other news.... by ElvenMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... A French police spokesman talking about the stolen U2 album confirmed that "We still haven't found what we're looking for."

    --
    "Joy is not in things; it is in us." Richard Wagner
    1. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... A French police spokesman talking about the stolen U2 album confirmed that "We still haven't found what we're looking for."

      Wouldn't that be "We still haven't found 'We Still Haven't Found What We're Looking For?'"
    2. Re:In other news.... by Astreja · · Score: 1

      They'll probably find it on New Year's Day.

  132. Re:10 OUT OF 10 TERRORISTS AGREE by ThaReetLad · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    wrong. Terrorists love GWB because its cheaper and easier to let him do the hard work of converting thousands of young people to their cause.

    --
    You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  133. U2 a little full of themselves by aka-ed · · Score: 1
    I was on staff of a rock magazine, word came back from U2 management that the boys were quite tiffed that the editor had called them 'sexy' in a magazine cover line. This was circa 1985.

    Just a tad controlling.

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  134. Mod down by Flower · · Score: 1

    You do understand the inherent fallacy in what you just said now? Riiiiiight?

    --
    I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  135. U2 threatens to release album! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Anybody else read this and got the feeling that the iTunes part was obsolete? ;-)

    1. Re:U2 threatens to release album! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey fucker this joke was funny the first 20 times it was posted, unfortunately for your retarded ass, you're #21. Ass

    2. Re:U2 threatens to release album! by Lispy · · Score: 1

      So what youre saying is that not only I should RTFA but also the discussion? Are you for real?

  136. But U2 is a liberal band!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I don't want to hear any whining from the liberal Slashdot group. Support your side, people!

  137. Typical idiot moderators... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would you expect anything less?

  138. Donwload bloody download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be impressed if boner and the gang would say screw it the whole show is creative commons... as if they still need to pump cahs into rich music execs pension funds anymore.. Either that or donate the entire albums turnover to charity, that's even better, Boner, get your ass in Darfour and help somebody!! Quit playing rich-bitch! Ach they haven't made good music for over a decade anymore so whatever...

  139. Re:YES YOU FUCKING HOMOSEXUAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These prove that the grammys like U2 and nothing more. They completely ignre the fact the bono is a publicity seeking c*nt.

  140. This is fantastic news! by Napoleon+Blownapart · · Score: 0

    I was used to not buying any of U2's albums at my local record store but now, with the iTunes release, I will have a new, thoroughly modern way, not to buy another crappy U2 album.

  141. We could also summise from this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that U2 fans are not geeks who hang around Slashdot 24/7? ;)

  142. WTF? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Ok I've just woken up and I might be a little out of it, but WHY THE FUCK IS THIS A THREAT?? what are they threatening to do? release really bad music or something? Will releasing the album somehow open a key to the 5th dimension portal of darkness?? And another thing, "French police have launched a major operation to find the disc." A major investigation?? WTF is a major investigation, surely that's the sort of investigation you do when some kid goes missing and witnesses say they saw a dodgy man with a van, then you go and get 200 police to search fields. You don't do a major investigation to find a CD. The fact is, and im sorry U2, your album will be on P2P networks, either now, or when its released, theres no if or buts, its a 100% sure bet, but why half the police force of Nice should waste time looking for something that's not even the master copy is beyond me.

    Stars are all selfish assholes.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  143. and you're complaining because....? by bonovoxpsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    of all the bands to bash, you're going after u2?

    a band that has said it doesn't care about people downloading their albums, as long as they don't make a profit on it... they've actually released concert bootlegs for people to download - legally!

    they do understand that the more people listening to their music the better - they are one of the bands that "gets it". the big issue here is they're worried about unfinished demos hitting the internet and people getting a wrong taste of their new album. this isn't a band that is worthy of slashdot bashing.

    but then, my handle tends to give away my bias ;)

    1. Re:and you're complaining because....? by DrunkenPenguin · · Score: 1

      Glad to see I'm not alone here! Let's drink to U2's new album!

    2. Re:and you're complaining because....? by MagicBox · · Score: 1

      Well let me just say that if we created software remotely as good as U2 create their music.....we'd still be using it 20 years later and loving it. So I do agree. U2 doesn't deserve to get bashed. But then this is slashdot. There's a basher for everything and everyone.

      I am not a crazy U2 fan, but it's easy to recognize quality. U2 is quality

      On the other hand, it is unfortunate if their music is released on the net. The *campaign* against *illegal song downloading* seems to have worked with me (or is it that as I get older I feel more guilty about things??). Haven't *illegaly* downloaded a song in almost 2 years now. Just the other day I spent $200 in CDs. Honestly....I was happy. I thought about the pain and everythign else associated with downloading and ripping all those CDs, not to mention that , hell , I should pay someone for their hard work. I get paid.


      I hope I didn't sound like a RIAA spokesperson. In case I did...I fukin hate RIAA for your clarification. I was just trying to make a point which noone seems to care about siding with anymore. I have no love for the recording *ripp off* empires, but I do respect the musicians that I like, even if they get 50 cents for a CD which cost me $20.

      --

      The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  144. One word, two syllables: by AllanLembo · · Score: 1

    Demarcation.

  145. But, but, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you steal my car from me, I'll go buy a new one!!!!

  146. Mod Parent Up!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did you not get mod points when you're absolutely correct and the parent post is obviously wrong?? I guess it'd help if moderators actually RTFA and/or knew what they were talking about.

  147. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just offer something on the album that you won't get from P2P?

    You know.. added value stuff. Instead of just disabling the brain and rushing it out.

  148. marketing ploy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this just sound like a ploy to raise interest in the band and the CD? It's getting them headlines which they nornally wouldn't have. I highly doubt any this happened...

  149. Threaten? by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

    You mean that they are going to force people to listen to the Edge play that same shitty guitar riff that he's been playing for the past 20 years earlier than scheduled?

    --
    -Cnik
  150. Lemon II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sour be thy name

  151. U2 by the_real_rs · · Score: 0

    U2 gives alot of money and time for good causes. sometimes all the money from the tour.I download stuff off the net but i really support U2. They always made great music so why not support them

    --
    Some software money can't buy. For everything else there's Micros~1
  152. Bono's Evil Plan!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous U2 Band member:
    Hey shit our song is available on P2P...

    Bono:
    It's ok we'll make those bastard suffer. Release it early before the studio can work over it and make it sound good, get it into the charts and make them hear it on every radio station known to man.

    All:
    Evil Laugh

  153. Security by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    What can our homeland defense and the Patriot act do to protect us from foreign threats like this.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  154. huh? by Skadet · · Score: 1

    think U2's desire is to get something out that they feel is close to a finish product rather than having an album out for months that isn't near what they wanted the final album to be. For me that's a respectable decision.

    From what *I* got out of the article, the album was already in post-production. Believe me, anything of significant value rarely goes on there. They'll finish post-production and ship on time. No big deal.

    Edge said they lifted "one piece of plastic". Unless the band kept their sole copy of the album on one CD - which as you know isn't the case - the album isn't gone.

    I would bet real money that the post-produced version isn't significantly different than the version lifted.

  155. Simple logic? by Skadet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, if it's available only illegally, then a fan who wants to hear the album has no choice but to break the law.
    [...]the logic becomes quite simple.


    Speaking of logic, you committed the fallacy of the false dichotomy. A fan who wants to hear the album DOES have a choice: wait. Or download illegally.

    Downloading is never the ONLY option.

    1. Re:Simple logic? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Yes. If you followed the thread a little bit further, you'll see where I clarified that I missed out a few words. What I had meant to write was "a fan who wants to hear the album right now has no choice but to break the law."

      I am aware that you can just wait for the album, and that would be the laudable thing to do. I'm pointing out that many people would not do the laudable thing.

  156. Re:What? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

    I did the same thing with Vapor Trails... downloaded it a few week early, bought it the day it came out. The one thing that bugged me about doing this was that on the MP3 version, songs 13 and (I think) 8 were swapped. When the actual CD was released, I felt that these two songs were in the wrong order for the longest time.

    Anyway, actually Rush did complain about the MP3's being released. I read in an interview or two how they were quite upset that it happened.

  157. With all due respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The band either has a history of hoaxes or they're all morons.

    Neither description is very flattering.

  158. OT: Actually... by krammit · · Score: 1

    Actually, that track listing was an April Fools joke on t.d.n (or it may have been their official site but whenever I think Tool and April Fools, I think t.d.n). If I remember correctly, another track off that listing was "Floor Pail", an anagram for April Fool. But you're right, tracks did show up on P2P bearing those names. It was usually either Sober, Prison Sex or some crappy band that thought they sounded enough like tool that people wouldn't mind the disappointment...

    --
    "Watch your cornhole, bud."
  159. Sorting the world into absolute friends and foes? by ianscot · · Score: 1
    So, is U2 the friend, or the enemy of modern music? Is "modern" music that which is envisioned by the likes of Corgan, where expression is free in it's entirety, or is it that which rakes in the cash?

    All these bands are caught between a rock and a hard place with the music industry as it is today. Let's not banish U2 for saying they'll release an album early on iTunes. That's hardly the biggest sin in music today, and they're all sinners in your sense -- they all want to make at least a living.

    The thing to do is try to work out a new economic model for the industry, and maybe rewarding attitudes like the Pumpkins' is a start, okay. But "everything is free free free" isn't a new way to support music, and neither side is absolutely good or evil.

    You're sounding a little like the zealot who's identified an apostate -- "U2 is showing their true colors, now..." They're hardly the first band whose albums fell off some and became more corporate; Joni Mitchell was writing songs about that dissipated feeling in the 70s.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  160. Re:Dear Slime-dogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best place to go would be the smashing pumpkins direct connect hub, but last I checked you need to register on their web page before you can connect. Of course, now the web page gives a 404 error. Maybe it will come back on-line sometime. Anyway, the hub address is dchub://tsphub.dyndns.org:1979

    Alternatively, you could wait until machina ii gets seeded again on http://sharingthegroove.org/. From a quick search, it looks like someone last tried to get this going a couple weeks ago.

    Another option would be to do some searching and find someone willing to do a B&P (blanks & postage) of machina ii. You send them cdrs and postage, they send you back the discs.

  161. Fans threaten to download album instead by icedcool · · Score: 1

    Seriosly, what do they think they have some kind of power over their fans? The music will pop up on p2p no matter what, its inevitable. Weither it is someone buying it off itunes then sharing or not it will go up on p2p.
    That they think they can muscle their fans is a joke. It's kind of riaa'ish.

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
  162. Attention by frodough · · Score: 1


    I for one would have had no idea U2 has released another album.

    I for one welcome our Irish pop overlords.

    ATTENTION DUMBASS, DO NOT USE THE PHRASE "I for one". UNLESS OF COURSE YOU WANT EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT YOU ARE A SIMPLETON.

  163. Can't....help....myself..... by LordPixie · · Score: 1

    Kind of sad when you don't know that one of your favorite bands is releasing a new album soon until you read it on Slashdot.

    It's kind of sad when one of your favorite bands is U2 !!! *rimshot*

    Heh, sorry. Couldn't resist. =) I didn't need that Karma anyways.


    --LordPixie

  164. U2 is still a band? by dentar · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought they went out with mullets...

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  165. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But will is make U2 suck any less? I think not.

  166. Who is being threatened? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It doesnt appear to be the listeners.. " if you release what you stole to everyone, we will give it to everyone in digital format earlier "..

    Or at least thats how i see it...

    Strange sort of threat....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  167. Re:The Letter U and the Numeral 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before you marked this as "Flamebait" you should have done a google search for the phrase "These guys are from England and who gives a shit."

    For shame; you give computer dorks a bad name.

  168. Tip for the Fench police by jjoyce · · Score: 1

    check in the garbage.

  169. gift (Linux P2P) by JCholewa · · Score: 1

    > Is there a linux P2P alternative?

    I recommend giFT. You can find it at gift.sf.net, and modern distros should have it in their repositories (try something like "urpmi gift" or "apt-get install gift" to see if it automatically installs from the internet). You can use different front-end clients with it, which is a nice feature. Apollon is the popular gui front-end, and giFTcurs is an excellent ncurses-based (works in text terminals, but has tabs and layouts like a gui app) front-end. It can be attached to FastTrack (that's the Kazaa network) as well as Gnutella and gift's own OpenFT network. It's possible that somebody will eventually add support for other P2P networks, so I'm crossing my fingers and hoping. :)

    --
    -JC
    http://www.jc-news.com/coding/freedom/

  170. Unoriginal bastards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bands usually try to do something new and original. Since U2 hasn't done anything original since the 80's, I guess they're trying to branch into new modern areas. This might coincide with Bono's head nearing critical mass.

  171. My copy of Pumpkins' release by freality · · Score: 1

    Is at:

    http://freality.org/library

    Under "sound".

    Please mirror if you d/l.

  172. Threatens? by Hassman · · Score: 1

    This is a threat how?

    --
    -Mark
    Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  173. "U2's desire"? Shouldn't that be... by lavar78 · · Score: 1

    "desi-i-i-i-ire"?

    --
    "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  174. what's the holdup? by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    If this disc is in 'releasable' condition, why are they dragging their feet on it to begin with? They say they can have hard copies in stores within a month. Why not just go ahead and do it?
  175. Not Stolen! by Narmi · · Score: 1

    A copy of the album was not stolen. It was left behind at a photo shoot in France. See story:

    http://1077theend.com/musicnews.asp

    (bottom of page)

  176. Re:Don't encourage them by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

    Seriously, iTunes kills me with the AAC. I am a huge U2 fan but will only listen to OGG format sorry Apple (love your computers hate your compression). Anything else (besides wav) hurts my ears and gives me soft stool.

  177. Re: your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell no bitch, you'd have a dick in yo mouf!

  178. The depressing thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always thought music was about making your story heard. The best way of getting what you're about out is to sing it and so forth...

    All this proves is that U2's music isn't about love, pain or being human but about a sack of cold hard cash.Just as bad as the bastards that are pushing music clearly of an adult theme onto small children.

    Friends and enemies was different for another reason, it meant something.

  179. Re:What? by thoromyr · · Score: 1

    Complain or not I think that there is a large difference in the fan base. I like U2 well enough (and have War and Joshua Tree), but I have *every* studio Rush album. Add them up and its quite a bit. I know many more people who know and like U2 than I do those who appreciate Rush, but those who like Rush tend, like me, to collect all the music (in fact, I'm somewhat unusual for those I know as I have avoided the live albums).

    On the other hand, Rush isn't U2 so when it happens to U2 its going to get more media attention. Which I guess is to say that I think Rush probably has less to lose by this kind of theft/release than U2, but the difference in perceived band reaction is likely to be just media attention.

    Thoromyr

  180. Screw these guys by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Every time U2 comes out with an album, I mail a money order for the cost of the CD to Negativland.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  181. Re:What? by jandrese · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't know about you, but I hate buying music without hearing it first, and if you're not into top-40 your opportunities to hear it first are pretty slim. You can chase your band around when they go on tour (IF they go on tour), hope that they come to your hometown (ha!), or try the pirate route.

    I will admit that this mentality has cut into some record sales, as I have bought far fewer albums that are complete--listen to it once and throw it away--crap. On the other hand, when an album comes out that's actually good I always buy it, after all, I want to support the artists (which is really what the whole thing is about in the first place), so they can continue to make more.

    What we really need is a better way to preview music that is not:
    1. Illegal
    2. Lame -- Like only giving you the first 15 seconds at 20kbps of a song
    3. Firmly in the grasp of large record companies that concerned only with their top-40 performers. It's a shame that most internet radio has been a huge letdown in this regard.
    4. Impractical -- If you charge $100 a month, or have horrible DRM, or only work on windows with special software the screws everything else up, etc....
    5. Obscure -- There needs to be a way to find stuff. There are some great radio stations out there that nobody knows about (and aren't available in your area).
    You know what the worst part is? Most P2P applications only fail on #1, while most legal stuff fails on at least half of these bullets.
    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  182. U2 is following a Proper Solution to the P2P leak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used every single P2P network since Napster first hit the scene years ago. Frankly they all suck big time in finding what you are looking for and once you find it, getting decent bandwidth to download it!

    With iTunes I find what I am looking for and am able to pay for it and download it very quickly and easily. $0.99 a song is a very reasonable fee. I typically buy by the song and not the album. There are only a few albums where I would buy the whole thing and these are generally greatest hit albums. iTunes also just added thousands of Indie artists recently. Bravo for Apple!

    I freaking love iTunes! I use it frequently. I buy music now and then once a month. I back up the original AAC files to DVD-RW and I use Hymn to strip the DRM and back them up again. This is just in case something goes wrong down the line and to ensure full compatibility with other AAC systems. (i.e. mp4p to mp4a conversion). You have to have a valid iTunes license to strip the DRM and it maintains metadata that would burn you if you distributed it via P2P.

    Personally, I have no problem with the Apple DRM even though I back it up and use Hymn to strip it out I do not use Hymn to distribute these songs on P2P I use it to ensure future usage on non-Apple based systems.

    I own an iPod and use it all the time. I burn CD's for my car. I share the music between two Apple systems and multiple users. I will stream the audio to my stereo with an Airport Express when I get a chance to buy one.

    Apple is the only online vendor of music that actually 'Get's It'. All other's are clueless and are the only reason P2P is still popular. Of course there is the fringe P2P user who will never give up pirating music.

    Why should I hunt and peck for music on the wilds of the Internet and risk getting sued by the RIAA when I could just find it and buy it for a reasonable price in just a few minutes?

  183. the pumpkins' last album by yipyow · · Score: 2, Informative

    when the smashing pumpkins released machina 2: the friends and enemies of modern music on the internet, it was partly because virgin records wasn't interested in the album (especially not a double album) after the lackluster sales of their previous album, machina: the machines of god. there is a link explaining all about it here, and you can download machina 2 here.

  184. Re:It's a hoax. (RTFA) by Hamhock · · Score: 1

    Well, if you RTFA, you'd see that the photo shoot was in the studio they were recording in. So, it's not too hard to imagine they would have a version of the album hanging around on disc.

    --
    Two Minus Three Equals Negative Fun -Troy McClure
  185. i have a promise for u2 by steak · · Score: 1

    i promise to continue to not buy u2's music.

    wankers.

  186. Oh Oh, Don't tell me by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    ... You live in Utah, right?

  187. Re:Don't encourage them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hello there straw man!

  188. Delicious irony by Mozo · · Score: 1

    Ah, the irony of complaining about a band "ripping off" a Led Zeppelin song.... LZ was all about taking old blues songs and turning them into rock-n-roll. Which was a *good* thing, IMHO. As is the song "Bullet the Blue Sky," IMHO.

    As for the severe overplaying of Joshua Tree songs by the "machine," I'm completely with you. Commercial radio can run even a good song into the ground by overplaying. Of course, it usually sticks to bad songs to overplay....

    -mozo

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= John Reinert Nash -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    1. Re:Delicious irony by I_M_Noman · · Score: 1
      Ah, the irony of complaining about a band "ripping off" a Led Zeppelin song.... LZ was all about taking old blues songs and turning them into rock-n-roll. Which was a *good* thing, IMHO
      IMHO, too.
      As is the song "Bullet the Blue Sky," IMHO
      Me, not so much.
      Commercial radio can run even a good song into the ground by overplaying. Of course, it usually sticks to bad songs to overplay....
      Amen, brother! When my wife & I are driving down the Jersey Shore every Saturday with WPLJ on we take bets on how many times we'll hear a particular song before we get there (or on the way back). It's become a family joke. (I'd much rather be listening to K-rock or WFUV, but there you go.)
  189. Re:What? by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    There's a quasi-legal option out there... allofmp3.com. If you're a paid member, you can stream complete low-quality (24kbps?) mono versions of anything in the catalog. Quality is blah, but you can tell if you like the music. Plus side here is that even if at some point someone determines that it's illegal to download tunes from them, you haven't downloaded anything, so you're (probably - IANAL) within the law. And, your $10 traffic subscription lasts forever if you don't download.

    Unfortunately, you're limited to what's in their catalog, but it's a fairly decent selection.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  190. I'll stop holding out on you.... by afxgrin · · Score: 1

    Use SoulSeek .... there is a Linux soulseek client named Nicotine which runs very well and makes me a happy downloader again.