Slashdot Mirror


The Japanese/American Tech Deficit

Why do the Japanese get all the coolest gadgets, while the U.S. is left with the second-tier, less-innovative ones? The San Francisco Chronicle delves into this age-old mystery and provides a few explanations for those of us who don't live near Akihabara.

787 comments

  1. First things by SIGALRM · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why do the Japanese get all the coolest gadgets ... ?
    True, but let's put this into perspective. The U.S. usually views blockbuster movie releases first. Many hot game titles are available here first. It all evens out in the long run. Besides, our consumer markets are (of course) driven by entirely different value systems--for better or worse, Japan and the United States have contrasting prerogatives in importing/exporting technology and entertainment.
    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:First things by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

      Many hot game titles are available here first

      That's not true. Newest games are available first on the streets of Taiwan.

    2. Re:First things by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

      while very very cheap pirate copies are easily available on the streets of the various other 3rd world South East Asian countries.

    3. Re:First things by ReeprFlame · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yes we do each do have different things that motivate them but most Americans are slackers. This is in the way that they don't really like learning, and therefore will take useless entertainment over beneficial invetions and technology anyday. The Japanese are more motivated into education and their cultural devotion shows through, even in US schools. That is probably why they develop more complex technologys and have the willpower and capacity to. If some parts of America would change, and people's perspective on education and development, then maybe we WOULD get some more advanced technologies before Japan, and even Europe in this case...

    4. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "This is in the way that they don't really like learning"

      s/learning/teaching/

      Teaching here is almost all memorization and regurgitation. Teachers don't care, though -- no reason to. Their jobs are safe. The worse they do the more money their school gets. A great system, American public education...

    5. Re:First things by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any teacher worth keeping can make a lot more doing just about anything else. I'm for extensive reform of the US K-12 educational system - including a nationalized curriculum and a professionalized teacher's corp (along the French model, in which teaching is part of a heirarchical civil service), and the end to local school boards (populated by political failures with no background in education whatsoever.)

      I would accompany all these changes with a dramatic increase in teacher's salaries and benefits. Then competition for jobs would improve performance. Teachers' jobs are secure because there is virtually no competition for them - school districts will take almost anyone they can get.

      But it's the school boards and administrations that are the biggest problem. They politicize - in the worst way, the local way - education in a very destructive way. Administration of schools should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in educational theory and practice, not a group of yahoos.

    6. Re:First things by computechnica · · Score: 1

      Joe Sixpack gets very excited about the cool graphics on the Football Game. He also likes the recliner with built in mini-fridge, bet them foriegners don't have that!

      Joe also gets technology edication on American Chopper.

    7. Re:First things by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, according to the article, the Japanese high tech gizmo market is driven in no small part ...

      by teenage girls.

      Now, that's a demographic that most slashdotters (including myself) have a very limited experience with. I'm not sure how envious I am of a market that that puts style and color in front of most everything (backed up by an infrastructure that this country will never equal). YMMV, of course.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try working as a teacher in the American school system and then the Japanese school system. There is not as much difference you may imagine.

    9. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only thing wrong with education in North America is North American parents. Oh, and teacher unions.

      But really, the parents are the big one. Kids don't eat right, they don't get any exercise, and they aren't pushed from home to learn. Anything that happens at school is "the teacher's fault", naturally, cause obviously the spoiled brat couldn't be at fault. Of course they can't learn anything - 3/4 of the day is tied up in classroom management, trying to keep all the spoiled, hypoglycemic monsters from killing each other, and the other 1/4 is spent teaching them things they should have learned at home before they were 4 years old.

    10. Re:First things by sarlen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes we do each do have different things that motivate them but most Americans are slackers. This is in the way that they don't really like learning, and therefore will take useless entertainment over beneficial invetions and technology anyday

      It's more that Americans are much more conservative with our entertainment, and our money. 90% of Americans don't see a NEED for a robot that flashes lights, does your dishes and explodes randomly. I'm sure WE all do, but remember the community we're apart of here. It's all about what America's consumer driven economy can handle - it's not for lack of our ability to create these products, it's a lack of market.

    11. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes beyond K-12; to be a professor you don't have to have any form of teaching education, all you need is a doctorate and you're good to go.

    12. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "foriegners"
      "edication"

      " Joe also gets technology edication on American Chopper."

      I'm wondering where you got your "edication."

    13. Re:First things by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Teaching here is almost all memorization and regurgitation.

      You're talking about the United States, right? I thought you meant Japan!

      Seriously, isn't "learning by rote" the stereotype of Japanese education (with some basis in truth), after all?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    14. Re:First things by tasidar · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But it's the school boards and administrations that are the biggest problem. They politicize - in the worst way, the local way - education in a very destructive way. Administration of schools should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in educational theory and practice, not a group of yahoos.

      I agree with your post, and favor removing political influence from school boards. Members of the board should be drawn from lifetime teachers/educators, and isolated from the direct public.

      But, consider this...
      If we really want to improve our education system, we have to improve our society's views on teachers
      (ie, get rid of "You know what they say, those who can do, those who can't teach").

      To me, that quote shows one of the most damning things about our education system, teachers aren't respected.

    15. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least no hands on experience.

    16. Re:First things by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      There's a couple big difference: the US has a documented poor K-12 system, compared to other countries (Finland, South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan top the list right now.)

      The US higher education system - particularly at the graduate level - may be the best in the world, or close to it.

      And to get a doctorate, you usually have to do some teaching. I'm working on a PhD now, and will have taught sections for at least 4 quarters before I get it.

    17. Re:First things by Daimaou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think, more than anything, it is a matter of cost. I remember when MD Players first came out in Japan. Everybody had one. They had MD Car Stereos, MD Walkmans, MD portable stereos, and MD breakfast cereal.

      You could also go down to any number of rental stores and rent CDs and buy blank MD discs to record them on (now THAT would never go over in the US). Most people did this because it was cheaper than buying the CD for $25 - $30.

      When I returned to America, however, nobody was using MD players, even though they were available. The problem, I think, was the cost. MD players were around $400 dollars at the time. Nobody in America would spend $400 for a portable Walkman type device, so MD players never caught on. Couple that with the fact that America tried to sell MD versions of commercial CDs instead of just selling the blanks so people could copy CDs; which is what was done in Japan.

      I think this is the case with a lot of the tech gadgets that you can buy over in Japan. The cost of these items is always too high for the American market so Americans won't buy the stuff. Therefore, nobody bothers importing it anymore.

      The market is also different in Japan. You can do things there that you can't do here, so some of the gadgets just don't make sense in America (MD players being one example).

    18. Re:First things by Wybaar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Many hot game titles are available here first

      That's only partly true. Game titles that appeal to US audiences more than Japanese audiences are available in the US first, games like Grand Theft Auto, first-person shooters, etc.

      Role-playing games, such as Xenosaga Episode 1 (about a year between when it came out in Japan and when it reached the US), Xenosaga Episode 2 (available in Japan 6/24/04, available in the US 2/15/05 ... hopefully), Final Fantasy 7 (available in Japan 1/31/97, in the US 8/31/97), etc. often come out in Japan first -- and some that come out in Japan don't come out here at all or come out MUCH later than in Japan.

      For instance, Final Fantasy 5 came out for the Super Famicon [I assume, even though the GameFaqs page lists it as SNES] in 1992. For Playstation, it came out in 1998 in Japan. US gamers had to wait until 1999 for it to come out as part of Final Fantasy Anthology for the PS. The Final Fantasy series isn't exactly unknown here in the US ... and yet we had to wait for that game for about 7 years.

      The types of games that you're thinking of that are available here first are probably the types of games mentioned in this article.

      But at least, looking at the release dates on the pages linked above, RPG fans in the US are luckier than those in Europe :)

      --
      Y|
    19. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mod this whole thread offtopic.

      I am certain that the American educational system has its flaws, as there is always someone bitching about it, but it has nothing to do with driving the technology market.

      RTFA, it's about fashion.
      I see this happening (althow in a smaller scale apparently) in the US with the iPod, or the cellphone market in Europe.

      Apparently the female market is more active in Japan and that tips the scale.

    20. Re:First things by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Japanese are more motivated into education and their cultural devotion shows through, even in US schools. That is probably why they develop more complex technologys and have the willpower and capacity to.

      Aren't you being just a *little* rose-tinted about the Japanese obsession with technology?

      I mean, sure, some of it is educational, but a lot of it is just flashy toys. Nothing necessarily wrong with that, but let's not over-idealise it.

      Remember that Slashdot story about giving conversational robots to old people in Japan? That isn't something I find desirable, personally.

      And I'm fed up of the tech--> educational spin that goes around. I think the educational uses of computers (and other technologies) are *way* oversold. It's like BT's broadband advert in the UK, featuring pictures of Henry VIII and the like; "Use it for your homework". Of course they're trying to sell something, but I think too many people are guilty of believing them.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    21. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Any teacher worth keeping can make a lot more doing just about anything else."

      Which doesn't make much of a statement on the percentage of teachers worth keeping... Everyone has had that super awsome teacher that they loved. How many were super crappy teachers that you hated?

      "I would accompany all these changes with a dramatic increase in teacher's salaries and benefits."

      This is almost exactly my very own plan to fix the U.S. education system. Make starting wage for a teacher $40,000 / year. You'd have to accopany that with castrating the teacher's union, however. Once you start attracting the bright stars, you'll need to be able to toss out the burnouts - and the union seniority system wouldn't be willing to allow it.

      It'll never happen tho. First, it would cost too much. Second, as a solution it would take a long time to actually fix the problem. We'd have to turn over at least one generation of teachers.

      "Administration of schools should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in educational theory and practice, not a group of yahoos."

      I guess I figure that administration would have to scale with teacher salaries. Around here the top dog in school makes pretty good money. I guess that as you go up the command ladder you wouldn't have to stick with the exponential rise in $$$, but could go more linearly.

    22. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't accept the premise of this /. article on its face. The main point rests on the idea that Japan gets the coolest gadgets before they reach the US, or else they never get here at all, which I don't see. This makes me want to get in my way-back machine and remember a time when I first came out the California, a simpler time when people were much more humble and thoughtful...all the way back to the year 2000...

      I worked for a startup then whose business model was based on the idea of location-based offerings. (This sounds like spam, but it isn't.) As a customer, you'd go to their portal on the web and register an account. Then, later, you'd log in and enter information that you were going to be in the city on Saturday night, and you're looking to eat Italian food. You'd specify how you want to be contacted by the automated call system: cell, PDA, home phone, etc...and the hours, number of calls, etc.

      Then, on Saturday night, let's say an Italian restaurant owner is looking at a half-empty restaurant. He might subscribe to the service...so he'd log in on his end and enter in a 2-for-1 entree special. The site would match up your preferences with the business offering and call you to book a reservation.

      Surprisingly, this startup didn't fail (at least not right away...it lived several years). However, it did move...to Hong Kong. The funding source did some market research and discovered that we were likely never to make a go of this business by marketing it in the US. Americans get one or two calls that don't interest them from an automated service and turn the service off, saying they don't want to be contacted again. In Tokyo and Hong Kong, they found in their research that people will oftentimes walk around in public with the cell phone to their ear even though they're not on a call...it's a social status thing. They can't get enough calls over there.

      So, they packed it up and moved to HK. The point of this story is that, though by and large people are more or less the same the world over, there are cultural differences that manifest in surprising and unexpected ways. Americans tend to want technology that serves them, is quick and easy to use, and isn't too intrusive. Japanese, from what I can see, tend not to care about intrusiveness and are more interested in projecting a message about themselves through the use of personal technology devices. The more these devices intrude on their daily lives, in fact, the more they view it as a sign of being needed or desirable to others. (They even let technology make matchmaking decisions--have you heard about the pager-like device that they have over there? They enter their preferences for a perfect mate in it, and when they get within 25 feet of someone that meets their criteria, if that person has one too, they light up and buzz so the people can choose to meet each other. Again, this would never work in the US.)

      The upshot is, Americans get what we think is cool, and Japanese get what they think is cool. The Japanese philosophy tends to be oriented more towards the flashy whiz-bang type of stuff, like digital toilets and Internet-enabled refrigerators, whereas Americans would consider these devices as putting too much emphasis on activities we'd rather not think about, and definitely don't want hackers to have access to. (I'm convinced a good part of this cultural divide comes from the differences between Americans and Japanese opinions about personal privacy rights and expectations. Also, the anti-intellectual attitude in America doesn't help ingratiate technology into our daily lives either...think about it. In this country, one of the stock insults in grade schools and high schools is "you're a nerd". In other countries, like Japan, the insult would be "you're stupid".) This, combined with the fact that Americans always expect to have the latest, greatest, bestest, etc, means that we tend to look at the flashy whiz-bang stuff over there, which we don't want, and say, hey, how come we don't have that here?

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    23. Re:First things by keyne9 · · Score: 1

      Hot game titles? I suppose it's a matter of perspective, but Japan has held that market for much longer than the USA has. Consoles have very, very heavy Japanese support whereas PCs tend to have more American support. Up until the past few years, a blockbuster PC game was a drop in the bucket compared to the SquareEnix/Capcom/Konami-type companies. Only very recently have American developers brought a bit of headway into that area (Halo 2 being very notable), but then, American games aren't terribly 'Japanese'-friendly, and quite vice-versa. It's obvious that certain games will perform much better in either market, but even still, Japan holds the crown for the games that market to BOTH areas.

    24. Re:First things by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      and the end to local school boards

      Yeah, that makes sense, 'cuz what works in the inner city will work just as well in Bumpkinland. I mean, one size fits all, right?

    25. Re:First things by zulux · · Score: 1

      Agreed...

      In the US/Canada - generally we get the best hiking gear first* - From water filters, to stoves to tents to GPS equipment. MSR snowshoes alone are worth living here for ;). Fuck - we invented GPS, Goretex, half the new climbing equipment and internal-frame packs.

      *Except for AT/Randoee equipment - Euorope makes the best stuff.

      Another example: Small Airplanes.

      We have Lanceair. Europe and Japan have jack shit compared to this . And you can build it yourself. Can't do that in Europe.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    26. Re:First things by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      In some cases, yes, it does. The most successful educational systems in the world seem to be "one size fits all." It's not like Finland doesn't also have very urban and very rural areas.

    27. Re:First things by xenicson · · Score: 1

      "(populated by political failures with no background in education whatsoever.)"
      So, is your idea of a political success someone that does not get elected?

    28. Re:First things by srock2588 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Parents are heavily at fault. Look at previous generations and how many very successful productive people grew up in the hills or on farms with almost no formal education. But there parents taught them to work and how to survive. My grandfather, for instance, just retired from CEO of a company he started 40 years ago, now he lives on a yacht. It all started on a farm in rural PA bailing hay. Now we have all these damn Baby Boomer hippy parents mucking up the works. "I hate my parents. Damn beatniks." - Ned Flanders.

      --
      Ehh...this is the life we chose.
    29. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. usually views blockbuster movie releases first.

      That's because the primary determinant of whether a movie is a blockbuster here is marketing. Japan got Metropolis first (the new one, not Fritz Lang's), they got The Ring first, and tons of countries got Jet Li's Hero first.

    30. Re:First things by Fancia · · Score: 1

      Not to detract from your general point, but Final Fantasy 7 came out in Japan so much earlier because it was rushed to the market, and they didn't have the time to get everything finished. They took seven months for North American release in order to actually finish up the game, so North American gamers ended up with a superior product.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    31. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What has this to do with why japanese get all the gadgets first?

      Well done, offtopic post modded +5 insightful...

    32. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Small Airplanes"

      Small Planes and you forgot THE small plane, the Cessna 172.

    33. Re:First things by smyle · · Score: 1
      Administration of schools should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in educational theory and practice, not a group of yahoos.

      Yes, because it would be MUCH better to have an inbred system of people that worked their way up the chain "doing things they way we've always done it," and with no business experience to find out what people are actually looking for in a high school graduate.

      Yes, there are innovative outside-the-box thinkers in education, but most of them (especially the ones that tend to stick around for a long time) are very resistent to change. Then there's the other extreme of the "educational theory of the week". They don't seem to last that long, though.

      ...and BTW, I used to be the technology director for a small school district, so I know whereof I speak.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    34. Re:First things by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Another example: Small Airplanes.

      We have Lanceair. Europe and Japan have jack shit compared to this . And you can build it yourself. Can't do that in Europe.

      Although the interesting thing about that is that most of the small airplane manufacturers are gone due to absurd product liability claims. The old Piper company went feet up from that as I recall, and I think Beech was gobbled up by Raytheon, who decided they didn't want to deal with the liability of light civil aviation and cancelled the line. Since we allow homebuilt aircraft in this country it looks to me like the market shifted to kit planes, neatly sidestepping the issue of exorbitant manufacturer liability suits.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    35. Re:First things by Reignking · · Score: 1

      teenage girls. Now, that's a demographic that most slashdotters (including myself) have a very limited experience with.

      That might be a good thing...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    36. Re:First things by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Now that I look, you can buy a 2004 Beech Bonanza for $650,000 so I guess they're not out of the civil aviation business.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    37. Re:First things by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      The problem here is just what you said: "school districts will take almost anyone they can get."

      Our system has two flaws, which are related. One, supply and demand: teacher supply is high, so wages are low. Tons of people want to be teachers. I've seen people almost literally fight for substitute teacher jobs, so they have an "in" when a job opening comes up for a full time position.

      The second problem is, there are tons of lousy teachers. Some of the stupidest people I know want to be K-12 teachers. I am not kidding. NOTE: if you are a teacher and you are not stupid, I am not talking about you.

      These are related because there is a low barrier of entry to be a teacher. Tons of people want to do it are able to get a degree.

      In my mind this guarantees you get a glut of low-quality teachers, and good teachers' wages drop. Good money drives bad money out of circulation, as the theory goes. Many people who would make good teachers will do something else where they are respected and well paid.

      The obvious solution is to make it more difficult to get a teaching degree, and have mandatory testing of skills. Both these measures are rabidly opposed by the teacher unions. It's unfortunate, because it would drive up both wages and quality of teachers.

      To kind of tie this back into the topic generally, I have seen Japanese schools, and they are not all they are cracked up to be. They look better on paper than they do in real life. underachievers are cut loose, something that's not acceptable in the USA. The best things we could take from Japanese schools are administrative, in my opinion.

    38. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when was Hackney in South East Asia?

    39. Re:First things by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The upshot is, Americans get what we think is cool, and Japanese get what they think is cool. The Japanese philosophy tends to be oriented more towards the flashy whiz-bang type of stuff, like digital toilets and Internet-enabled refrigerators, whereas Americans would consider these devices as putting too much emphasis on activities we'd rather not think about, and definitely don't want hackers to have access to...

      I think that explains that godawful meatloaf I had Monday.

    40. Re:First things by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      BAD money drives GOOD money out of circulation. Woops.

    41. Re:First things by justins · · Score: 1
      Many hot game titles are available here first.

      Which is a neat trick, since the hot game consoles are available in Japan first.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    42. Re:First things by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Any teacher worth keeping can make a lot more doing just about anything else. I'm for extensive reform of the US K-12 educational system - including a nationalized curriculum and a professionalized teacher's corp (along the French model, in which teaching is part of a heirarchical civil service),
      Horrible idea!

      The best teachers that I've had, at least in high school, were in their 20s up to maybe age 40. The older teachers seemed like they were bored and "going through the motions." I have to admit that if I were a teacher, I might grow weary of teaching the same subject matter to kids 20 or 30 years in a row.

      Instead, I'd recommend giving the brightest college graduates a strong incentive to teach for a few years, namely a decent salary (say $40k/year) and complete forgiveness of all federal student loans. Not everyone should be admitted into this type of program - entry should be by interview and competitive examination. Kind of like Teach for America, except more so.

      and the end to local school boards (populated by political failures with no background in education whatsoever.)

      Nah. Make it a requirement that at least 2/3 of sitting school board members be parents of children in their town's school system. That would make sure that the majority of school board members would have a strong incentive to do the right thing.

      Let's not nationalise the school system and replace several thousand smaller bureaucracies which are at least moderately accountable to their constituents with one large inflexible bureaucracy that will ultimately be accountable to nobody.

      -b.

    43. Re:First things by hitmark · · Score: 1

      or to state it in a diffrent way, its driven by social gadgets. devices that brings people together and help people interact with other people. just look at sims and what market that sells to, its the exact same one...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    44. Re:First things by FortranDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      :chuckle: Only on /. would someone suggest reinforcing the broken parts of the existing system. Adding even more unresponsive bureaucracy is going to make things better?

      Two of the main problems of the existing system are the fact it is very difficult to get rid of bad teachers (tenure anyone?) and that there is a increasing loss of local control.

      You have to be able to get rid of bad teachers or be able to move them around. for things to ever improve. The problem with making them fully civil servants (they are pretty close to that now), is that the civil service will move to make sure it keeps its headcount as large as possible. Bureaucracies always try to increase because that gives them more power.

      Local control, well, you might want to take a look at the Constitutional principle of "consent of the governed". Yes, some local systems will screw up. However, some will find better ways to do things. Mistakes won't affect every school district and the good ideas can percolate through out the system. I mean, do you really want a monopoly with all that entails for your educational system?

      As far as "very professionalized administration", rampant credentialism is overwhelming actual education efforts. Instead of trying to educate students for those that go on and provide useful skills to those that won't move on to higher education, the system is being pushed towards making sure every student had a piece of paper stating they weren't left behind.

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    45. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a little more to it than this.

      The Japanese, especially the young ones, have huge disposable incomes, as a result of a culture where it's normal to share a tiny apartment in the city with other families. Because of this, they tend not to invest of their incomes in more permanent things, like houses. This leaves them a lot of cash to spend on the latest gadgets, and the fact that they spend a lot of their time away from home gives them a reason to want a lot of personal/mobile electronics, especially cellphones and PDAs.

      Americans, on the other hand, usually have home ownership as their highest priority, and along with this, the most expensive home their income can afford them. A fat mortgage payment leaves little income to spend on gadgets that'll be obsolete in 6 months. It's even worse when you're spending what's left on the most expensive car payment you can afford.

      Personally, I think both ways are screwed up. The Japanese culture encourages a lot of consumerism and wastefulness: where do all those obsolete cellphones and other electronics go? And the American system is fairly wasteful and shortsighted too. With all the expensive cars people are buying, they're burning more oil than if they had older cars (look it up: vehicle fuel economy peaked in the 80's, and has been going down ever since). And by buying the most expensive houses possible, we have tons of McMansions going up, which use enormous amounts of energy to heat and cool. (I know someone with a McMansion, and his electric bill in the summer was typically over $500.) But another problem is that these people are all in debt up to their eyeballs, and when something bad happens, they lose their house and car and everything comes tumbling down.

    46. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and if these 'professionals' are wrong? how does the public provide any feedback?

    47. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're missing something. A professor's job isn't to teach; it's to do research and write papers in order to bring more funding to the university. Teaching is for the TAs and grad students.

    48. Re:First things by Dman33 · · Score: 1

      Close... but this would put it into perspective... the general market in the US does not demand such gadgets as much as the market in the US demands SUVs with V10 engines, 4,500 sqft homes with no yards, and unlimited porterhouse steaks -all for a family of 3.

      In Japan, miniturization is much more important and 'cool' than in the US. Hell, half of the US population has too fat of fingers to use these neat gadgets anyway!

    49. Re:First things by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      If we really want to improve our education system, we have to improve our society's views on teachers

      I agree, and part of the problem can be seen above.

      "Teachers don't care, though -- no reason to."

      Apparently realdpk doesn't know any of the teachers I've known. Too bad.

    50. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they don't have to go through any training on how to be a teacher. They just stand up front and regurgitate their notes/what was in the book with the best of their ability.

    51. Re:First things by infinite9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nobody in America would spend $400 for a portable Walkman type device

      I know what you mean! Just look at how much the ipod has flopped!

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    52. Re:First things by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      So you're saying that urban math is different than rural math? Or urban physics is different than rural physics?

      I'm not saying that the cultures are the same between urban and rural areas (though mass media is definitely uniting the US culture overall), but what is learned doesn't change between one place and another.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
    53. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont think that our current (hell our last 8 or 9) administrations hacking and slashing school budgets has something to do with it?

    54. Re:First things by edittard · · Score: 0
      "Any teacher worth keeping can make a lot more doing just about anything else."
      Which doesn't make much of a statement on the percentage of teachers worth keeping...
      It isn't trying to, it's a statement about the pay levels realtive to other jobs.
      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    55. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I've known very few that do care, but most do not appear to. Many, perhaps even most, don't even grade assignments themselves, they farm it out to so-called "teacher assistants". I wonder how they could be further out of touch with their students. Maybe they could telecommute!

    56. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Money isn't the answer. I've known plenty of people who made tons of money and were still incompetent dickheads. :)

      Agreed on the union, though, 100%.

      A big part of the problem with our educational system is how heavily dependant it is on companies to produce the curriculum (via teachers books and such), instead of the teachers doing so. Imagine a teacher that would be capable of creating the entire year's curriculum -- that teacher would have to be quite knowledgable about the subject, and probably very interested in it as well.

    57. Re:First things by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "supply and demand: teacher supply is high, so wages are low"

      Bullshit. Check any job board in any school district, and you'll find teaching vacancies year round. You are wrong here.

      "These are related because there is a low barrier of entry to be a teacher"

      Again bullshit. As a first year teacher, I had to have a degree in a qualifying profession (not just any degree, only certain subjects), 300 hours of ESOL classes, 9 additional hours of college credit, 60 hours of ESE classes, 60 inservice points (1 point per hour) from additional classes, etc. To say "there is a low barrier of entry to be a teacher" shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

      Reading the rest of your post it becomes clear you're just trolling, but in the future try not to comment on things you have no understanding of.

    58. Re:First things by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I'll just briefly state that part of the problem with school boards is that they are too responsive. To the wrong people.

    59. Re:First things by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Expoldes randomly? Can I send one of those as a gift to my old bosss? It would allow the result to look more like an accident that say, grounding a tesla coil to his office chair...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    60. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Ah, didn't know that. I have only been through the educational system in the US (specifically, Lake Washington, in King County, WA)). I don't remember much application, just memorization and homework regurgitating what was memorized.

      The only classes I remember that weren't like that were the math classes. I think that's because you have to apply knowledge to solve an equation, instead of just reading the equation and knowing the answer.

    61. Re:First things by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      " So you're saying that urban math is different than rural math? "

      Urban Math: "Ok, now you stole this eight ball, and you step on it three times, how much bling can you buy?"

      Rural Math:"Farmer Jones has 300 acers of wheat, and 100 acres are lost due to drought, how much will his govt. subsidy be?"

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    62. Re:First things by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "Money isn't the answer"

      Sorry, but as a teacher, you're (half) wrong on this.

      Let me explain. In my area the price of a house has recently reached the point that I cannot qualify for a mortgage because I make too little. I can't take a second job, because I take pride in my first one, and I'm pursuing my PhD. Time simply isn't there.

      Now, I am a so-called "highly qualified" teacher (special certs) in a "critical needs" subject. The school I teach at is in an economically depressed area. If the school wants to keep me (and avoid hiring a most likely less qualified replacement) they will have to come up with some money. But they can't. The pay scale is standardized (fucking union) and raises are based on time taught. Acheivement, which in virtually every other job is rewarded by money, in this case is rewarded by...nothing. So, if I want a house, I can't continue teaching.

      Paying more qualified, highly successful teachers is necessary to promote other teachers to follow suit. By paying a standard rate, the shitty teachers are insulated against poor performance, and have little incentive to pursue advanced certifications.

    63. Re:First things by angryelephant · · Score: 1

      In other words, Japanese people have more cool tech toys because they are willing to spend more money on cool tech toys.

    64. Re:First things by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      I played Xenosaga. Typical anime-styled crap. Terrible writing and voice acting (my favorite is where a bridge officer, in the middle of being dressed down by the captain, gets a call on his cell phone and says "I gotta answer this" and just walks away). It stars an otherwise strong heroine given a the standard anime-style dinner-plate sized eyes and sweet girly voice. I find this aspect of Japanese pop culture more droll than any violent machismo of American or European cultures. Yet another otherwise good premise dumbed down for preteen audiences, or at least adult ones with the same maturity level. To say nothing of the fact that it's still a thin wrapper of plot wrapped around the usual take-turns-bashing-with-different-animation turn-based-rpg crap.

      Compare to a game like Beyond Good And Evil, which came out for the US, Canadian, and European markets all at once, with characters far more likeable and interesting than anything that Square Enix has stamped out and rolled off the line.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    65. Re:First things by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

      But, consider this...
      If we really want to improve our education system, we have to improve our society's views on teachers
      (ie, get rid of "You know what they say, those who can do, those who can't teach").

      Quite frankly, I disagree with your assertion that the society in the US is disrespectful to teachers. I have never met anyone who thinks of or treats teaching and/or teachers in a disrespectful manner. In my view, educators are revered highly in the US, unfortunately there are issues with funding the educational system and with the curriculum in many cases.
      (FYI - the saying you mentioned is derived from a sports saying - Those that can... play, those that can't... coach. That saying is only meant as an insult to the athletic ability of "coaches". The only time I have heard that comment made in regards to teachers was in CS classes and from Business majors, and that was only in college where the saying actually has some legitimacy for business classes. (How many people do you know would rather teach a business class than run a successful business?)

      In regards to elementary through high school teachers, I have never met anyone that disrespects their efforts. That may be because they are paid next to nothing and you really have to WANT to be a teacher. Nobody chooses to be a teacher "just because."

      Members of the board should be drawn from lifetime teachers/educators, and isolated from the direct public.

      I would rather see a mixture of teachers/educators and parents/others on the local school boards. You know, like the PTA is suppose to do. Also, the school board should never, NEVER, be isolated from the direct public. I will never let anyone have an impact on my child's education without having the ability to have an impact on those that make the decisions. I agree that the "lifetime politician" is a poor representative for a school board. But, isolating the board from the public is assinine.

      In my view, the real problem lies at the state level. That is where the decisions on curriculum are made. That is where funding decisions are made. That is where the "Lifetime Politicians" are screwing things up.

      --
      "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
    66. Re:First things by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you've come closer to the truth. There is a Japanese obsession with "novelty". Something new and shiny and cool that can be a fad then thrown away. It has become a huge headache for the government with all the electronics ending up in land fills. It seems like the Japanese rely on shopping for their entertainment more than TV or movies. Their retail culture is completely twisted around this idea. Some stores have an amusement park on the roof even!

      Also, there is less "personal" interaction in Japan. Half of it is the infamous cultural introversion, but the other half is lots of hours spent at work, school or commuting. They don't spend a lot of time really interacting with each other anymore. So to get that human interaction, they like constant electronic attention grabbers especially if it will connect them to people. Now you can see why wireless is so popular in Japan?

      In North America, take a look at who wants & embraces the tech in question. It's people in a similar boat: not enough daily personal interaction. If you have lots of friends you can talk to face-to-face or talk to live on the phone, do you really want some chirping electronic device intruding in your life?

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    67. Re:First things by pawnIII · · Score: 1

      I think teachers are respected, maybe not by the majority of students they are teaching, but by society as a whole.

      I also agree that Boards of Education have way too much influence; not to mention, there are far too many of them. In Oklahoma, more than 50% of the people in the education system are in supervisorary poisitions(talking bout people who are not at the schools themselves). The positions pay far more than the teachers make(some of them make $125k a year compared to just under $30k for a teacher). The massive amount of funding flowing to them is the reason education taxes are so expensive in this state(maybe the same for other states as well).

      The parents do hold a lot of blame as well, as studies show an overwhelming correlation between parental envolvement and success of students.

      On another note pertaining to this posting. Fact is the average American is swimming in tons of debt, whereas the average Japanese person is saving a decent amount. A problem the Japanese government has being trying to remedy for years now.

      Just stinks that countries like Japan have things like, TV-to-celluar and fiber-optic-to-home(have a friend that lives in Japan and pays $20 less than I pay for broadband, yet he has an OC-3 connection and I have a 3M/300k). I guess some of these can be atrributed to the fact that Japan is far smaller than the US in terms of population.

    68. Re:First things by mttlg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Americans, on the other hand, usually have home ownership as their highest priority, and along with this, the most expensive home their income can afford them. A fat mortgage payment leaves little income to spend on gadgets that'll be obsolete in 6 months. It's even worse when you're spending what's left on the most expensive car payment you can afford.

      You're partly right here, but not everyone is trying to spend money for the sake of spending money. You need to consider the kind of financial mentality that comes with buying a house - a house is a large financial commitment that is also intended to be an investment. The goal isn't to spend the most money, but to put your money into something that will keep its value without large additional costs (or can have its value increased with an acceptable amount of cost and effort).

      If you carry that thinking over into electronics, it means that you'll want something that will be useful for a good amount of time and can do its job well (or something that is so inexpensive that it can be thrown away when it fails, if the type of use allows for this). The result is a decreased demand for the next big thing and a big split between the high and low ends of the market.

      The bottom line is that Americans are concerned about value (either good quality for a price or questionable quality for next to nothing). There will always be some people who are more concerned about style, but the inevitability of purchasing a home and/or car instills a value mentality that is hard to overcome.

    69. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that having people hundreds or thousands of miles away making decisions about how to run the local school systems is going to be better than letting the locals run the local school system?

      The United States was founded with the idea that states were little nations with a central government only used to provide things which couldn't reasonably be handled by the states; things like national defense.

    70. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The japanese public is essentially a big pool of beta testers. It's amazing the number of gadgets I saw when I was last in Japan that won't make it to the shelves in North America. It's an interesting model, one that perhaps other economies could learn from. It's too bad that we've essentially destroyed our capability to manufacture here.

    71. Re:First things by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I hold plenty of respect for good teachers.

      But those who teach cause they can't do anything else, or because the college makes them do classes to get research money/access, or don't have a clue about the subjects their teaching, or dont care about such odd concepts as being civil to their students?

      Ask around a school sometime, you'll find plenty of those. and plenty of disrespect for them.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    72. Re:First things by corbettw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (look it up: vehicle fuel economy peaked in the 80's, and has been going down ever since)

      This sounds like bullshit, but I'll follow your advice and look it up.

      (minutes later)

      Wow, you're right! This is OT, but for those interested, read through this report from the EPA.

      A short quote: "Since 1975, the fuel economy of the combined car and light truck fleet has moved through several phases: (1) a rapid increase from 1975 to the mid-1980s, (2) a slow increase extending into the late 1980s, (3) a decline from the peak in the late 1980s, and (4) since then a period of relatively constant overall fleet fuel economy. Viewing new cars and trucks separately, the three-year moving average fuel economy for cars has increased 1.0 MPG since 1991, but that for trucks has been relatively constant."

      Maybe the anti-SUV crowd has a point, after all.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    73. Re:First things by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      It's starting off slow, but it's starting to happen in the US. In the Northeast, I've seen a marked increase in young, 15-25 year old, females obsessed with "texting". I've yet to know a single guy who's into it, with the possible exception of myself and my PalmOS Verichat client.

      Texting sure beats passing notes in class. Give it time. The female market will bring many of these gadgets across the pond.

    74. Re:First things by quax · · Score: 1

      I think you are overlooking one key factor that shapes human culture in surprisingly similar fashion: The level of urbanization. By and large the US is by its sheer size not a very urban society.

      Tokyo and all the other Asian mega-cities on the other hand are as urban as you can get.

    75. Re:First things by retinaburn · · Score: 1
      Yes, there are innovative outside-the-box thinkers in education, but most of them (especially the ones that tend to stick around for a long time) are very resistent to change.


      Where education can be replaced with any number of things, and still keep the statement true.
      Editors, Engineers, Programmers, Executives, Painters, Writers, Dog Walkers, Principals, Librarians, etc.

      People are people no matter what their profession is. Some do it to get by, some do it because they are passionate about it.

      I have seen many comments about the lack of insightful teachers in the school system. Perhaps its just your local area, but perhaps its your attitude. I have no teachers that were complete hard-asses in class, but if you went to them during office hours they were completely approachable, and willing to above and beyond to help you out. Only the rarest teachers will put themselves out there continuously, most people can't handle getting shit on by students, who seem to vary only in age, but never in maturity.

    76. Re:First things by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      How about increasing their pay to make it desirable to be a teacher? competition will automatically result... supply and demand.. if a tech grad makes 50-60K /year and a teacher makes a 100K ... quite obvious where there'll be demand... No idea how much the current educational system costs but presume its less then the Iraq war? :)

    77. Re:First things by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you go to school, but in Central Massachusetts, Millis in particular, teachers start around $35,000USD per year for 40 weeks worth of work. Most average $40-$45,000 per year. I know in 1994 my shop teachers were making $67,000 per year. Granted, those were shop teachers with specialized knowledge (architecture and mechanical engineering) but teachers in suburban America are NOT underpaid.

      Rural or Urban areas like NYC or Boston or Northern Maine, maybe. Not Millis, and certainly not Natick or Wellesley.

    78. Re:First things by steelem · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And administration of the country should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in bureaucracy theory and practice, not a group of yahoos, right? Wrong. Opinions on our current administration aside, such ideas strike me as anti-democratic. A strength of the united states is local adaptability, not one size fits all. The consequences of these choices are the dumb local politics of yahoos, but things could be far worse than that.

    79. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I am curious, are you forced to work for the union, or can you get out of that? It sounds like it's a really raw deal (as it seems to be with most unions).

      In my area teachers get 0% mortgages, but that might just be a local thing.

    80. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it show the amount of horsepower those vehicles had? Keep in mind that no one WANTS a car with a weak engine.

    81. Re:First things by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'll give a somewhat personal insight into that comment: Senior year of high school. Went 10 out of 12 trimesters of English scoring an average 96%. Midterms of 11th trimester I dropped to the 60% in a sports literature class I despised (100% my fault, not trying to blame the system here). But only halfway into the trimester, a computer could have, and should have caught such a catastrophic drop in performance.

      I had similar drops from my junior year in algebra 2 and precalculus senior year... I'm not a math guy.

      I'm not the type to ask for help, it's hard for me professionally today, but the fact that I'm paid to do it lessons the blow a bit, but as a 16 year old, I couldn't ask anyone for help. A quick inquiry from a guidance counselor or some such might surely have boosted my own self-interest enough to improve my grades.

      How much of America's poor educational performance is the simple effect of our kids not thinking anyone gives a shit if they pass or fail?

      Even 20 years ago you could correlate this sort of data on TRS-80s, there was no excuse for it in the mid-90's. I was never one who needed lots of help learning, so I can't comment on the performance of the school in helping those students out, but when a kick in the ass, or a simple inquistive person might have been useful, they were nowhere to be found.

    82. Re:First things by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Mostly I agree.

      On McMansions: I know some who build his McMansion, and his yearly (not monthly, yearly) heating and cooling bill is just over $100! This is in MN, so the low temp he was heating from was -30, and high was just under 100. He is CEO of a company that makes SIPs (structural insulated panels), and wanted to demonstrate how good his company's products are. Combine that with a ground source heat pump, and his results are duplicateable. (well energy prices have gone up since then, but even $200/year for heating and cooling is dirt cheap)

    83. Re:First things by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      I would first of all point you to a good book on this topic, written by a very well regarded ex teacher, Mr. Gatto.

      First of all, a standardized curriculum would be nothing short of disastrous. Consider this, unlike my home state of Ohio, where textbooks are purchased by the local school board, Texas purchases the books statewide. That means that every high school student studying american history is reading from the same book.

      This means that, regardless of the political preferences of the area, that everyone in Texas has the same book, which is politically skewed to fit comfortably with conservatives. Because text book makers wanna get the gold and sell a book to Texas statewide, all textbooks are written to make Texas happy, whether or not they are actually used there. Because of this, high school biology text books tend to be rather "conservative" regarding evolution and leave it up to the teacher in the classroom to deal with the topic.

      Now with a Texan president and a major leader in the House of Reps being from Texas do you think that a natinoal educational curriculum would be open to variety?

      and the end to local school boards (populated by political failures with no background in education whatsoever

      In big american cities, local school district boards are often stepping stones to higher offices. Not always mind you, but often.

      Administration of schools should be run by a very professionalized administration with a strong background in educational theory and practice, not a group of yahoos.

      I would say that this is already done in part. The teacher's union is amazingly powerful...most of the time at least as powerful as the local school board, especially since they are very much so united across not just the region or state, but the country.

      Having said that, most teachers, who are honest with themselves, will admit that educational theory is complete bunk, invented to keep educators teaching education at the college level...and by requiring teachers to take those classes, it serves as a way of keeping the labor supply down.

      I would accompany all these changes with a dramatic increase in teacher's salaries and benefits.

      I woudl change starting and ending salaries. Teachers get paid absurdly low to start, and obscenely high to finish. That needs to be flattened (thereby encouraging good people to become teachers and making sure that bad ones don't have so much incentive to hang on.)

      Administrator salaries are worse than obscenely high. They are overeducated and overpaid. You'll find that your large american school systems pay at least 30% of the costs to administrative salaries (easily.) Big changes are needed there.

    84. Re:First things by cens0r · · Score: 1

      But is there a reason we need more horsepower now than we did 10 years ago?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    85. Re:First things by bbuR_bbuB · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed that you have so much text in this reply, but you've clearly missed the point of the article. The conclusion of the article determined that the main reason why the Japanese get all the 'cool toys' is because they NEED them (due to tiny apartments) and people can AFFORD them (due to expensive housing, people tend to live in groups, lowering the per-person cost of housing for families).

    86. Re:First things by greed · · Score: 1
      The thing about those McMansions, though, is that most of them are very poorly constructed--especially when you consider the price being charged for them.

      A friend is looking at new and used homes in the western New Jersey area, so he was driving me through some of the new housing developments for comparison. The "merely" $600,000 homes were amazingly sloppy in construction; only mid-efficiency furnaces, contrasting utility fittings (plumbing vents and such) on the roof, tacked-on decorative elements. There was a lot more I could point out just from the car, but I've forgotten most of it.

      A number had gas fireplaces as well, but had a completely fake chimney built out of frame and siding. (Screams "rodent home" to me.) The fireplaces themselves had cool-venting balanced flues partway up the wall--and the furnace vent didn't use the chimney space, it went up through the roofline elsewhere!

      It wasn't until we got to the $750,000 neighborhood that I saw high-efficiency furnace vents and sensible chimney construction--those homes had masonry chimneys (so no room for rodents) or none at all. (All the furnaces vented at grade.)

      Also, starting around $700,000 you started to see colour-matched vents on the roofline. How much can it cost to buy a black vent cap instead of a plain aluminum one?

      Still, most homes had at least two 2-3 ton airconditioners, so I am sure glad I'm not paying to cool those monsters. (If you need that much cooling, you did not use high-quality insulation techniques.)

    87. Re:First things by iocat · · Score: 1
      I gotta call bullshit on the personal interaction thing. I was in Japan and I saw people there talking *all the time!* You couldn't even understand what they were saying, they were talking so fast (and in such a weird language)...

      Seriously, though, Japanese people are not any more introverted than Americans. If anything, they have to be more outgoing. There is a lot more rigid adherence to very structured, unspoken, rules of protocol and personal interaction, but all you have to do is spend a week kicking it in Tokyo and you'll quickly realize there're fewer major difference between our cultures than you would have thought.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    88. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse their lack of personal space and tolerance for each other's constant intrusive presence as "outgoing-ness". The Japanese culture is more socially introverted than American culture...so say the social scientists I've read. They just live on top of each other, so a lot of what would pass for social interaction in America is actually social ritual and protocol there...and it just doesn't count as a real, personal connection.

      It's things like this that lead us to false conclusions about each other--much of the time in East Asian cultures, you have to understand not only what's being said, but what's not being said, and in your case it sounds like you weren't privy to either in your observations. (This isn't a slam, sorry if it sounds like one.)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    89. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 1

      I think you missed my point. :-) The premise of the article is that Americans desire these toys, yet we don't have access to them. That's just wrong. We don't desire them, and we wouldn't buy them if we did have access to them.

      To some extent, you could even argue that the "cool toys" Americans want (and get) are houses, and the Japanese would probably much rather have those instead of their latest digital whiz-bang.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    90. Re:First things by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Your sad story of inefficiency and just-good-enough construction is too common. Maximum profit for the developers I guess.

      If I ever buy/build a house, there's one thing I can guarantee: It'll be of a smart, autonomous design. Hopefully there will come a time when this type of thing won't be laughed at as a "hippy ideal" by the energy-wasteful conspicuous consumers.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    91. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 1

      I'm totally making this up, but it also seems to me that it's cheaper to introduce wireless in the Japanese markets. Look at America, all big and open. It takes tens of thousands of microwave towers to target the urban areas. In Japan, assuming it could handle the bandwidth, you could probably throw up a single tower on the highest peak and get coverage of half the country and nearly the entire population.

      What does everyone else think about this? Anyone willing to do the research to prove me wrong? :-)

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    92. Re:First things by shredluc · · Score: 1
      The cost of these items is always too high for the American market so Americans won't buy the stuff. Therefore, nobody bothers importing it anymore.


      It's how they regulate everything is what does it for me. Why should i pay 400 bucks for something that i can't use however the hell i want to, cause i might get sued?

      IF it cost 800 dolars, and i could copy, duplicate, burn, spit, trample, throw, submerge, fling, pound, kick, punch, karate chop, pee, crap or do whatever else i wanted to do with it, or the media i put on it (without the posibility of getting sued), i would buy it in a heartbeat.

      That's why we have to buy crappy 100 dolar players, cause each damm cd costs 20-25 bucks, and all the songs blow but one. And god help you if you rip it and put it on the player.

      It boils down to this: If i didn't have to spend hundreds of dolars on cd's (ie. music i wouldn't wipe my enemies a$$ with) i would spend it on the damm player.

      I know there's more holes in this argument than swiss chesse, but humor me for a while.
    93. Re:First things by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone reasonable would laugh at you. However, the market dictates what gets built: Most people just don't care enough about the construction of their home to pay for it... since the builder can easily sell the 600k cardboard homes without "going the extra mile", so to speak, why wouldn't they?

      Your point might be, "Well, the builder SHOULD care." To which I reply, they do, they build better homes for more money, or in different locations. There is no monopoly on housing.

    94. Re:First things by imurchie · · Score: 1

      And those who can't teach, teach gym.

    95. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a couple of problems with this.

      1) House vs. car. Houses usually appreciate, so yes, they are a type of investment. Cars, however, do not. Even expensive cars don't appreciate, and luxury cars actually depreciate faster than cheaper cars. People might think they're investing in a better car sometimes, but a Hummer H2 or Navigator is not going to last any longer than a Civic or Outback, and simply costs a lot more to buy and to drive. Value-conscious people buy sensible cars and keep them for a long time, but I don't see much of that any more.

      2) Houses can be investments, however the way many people do it now, they're not. When you get a 30-year loan, you're paying only interest for a long time. Even worse, when you buy a really huge house, it's going to come with really huge utility bills. Most people aren't going to stay in their McMansions for 15 years, so that they can make a return on their investment. They're simply betting that the property will appreciate enough in the short time they're there to make it better than renting. While the market is generally good right now, it could go back down any time, so this is not a really safe bet IMO (not as safe as getting a smaller house and a shorter loan so you can build equity faster, even if the market falls).

      But I do agree that the overall idea of value is there. I just think a lot of Americans aren't putting this idea into practice very well.

    96. Re:First things by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Two of the main problems of the existing system are the fact it is very difficult to get rid of bad teachers (tenure anyone?) and that there is a increasing loss of local control.
      You have to be able to get rid of bad teachers or be able to move them around. for things to ever improve. The problem with making them fully civil servants

      Tenure is a big problem, and its ridiculous practice to apply to primary school educators. The whole point of tenure was to allow researchers with a proven record of academic competence to present unpopular fruits of research without getting fired for presenting the new idea. Primary school educators do not present new research to high school children, and technically, they're not supposed to be teaching anything which contradicts the prerogative of the local school board. Unfortunately, its been a contractual practice to incorporate tenure at that instruction level because of convention, so removing it becomes a sticking point in contract negotiations. Thus, we get stuck with underperformers that we cannot remove.

      Don't forget our legal system for contributing to this decline. A lot of destructive policy gets put into place to placate the leeches in suits. And finally, yes, the parents are probably the biggest problem. But there's no means testing in handing out marriage licenses or pregnancy. Its also ridiculous not be able to expel students with sufficent cause. On the other hand, you have idiot administrators expelling kids for possession of aspirin or a t-shirt.

      The real problem is we live in a country who's people are stupid enough to vote for Bush.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    97. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Even more important, what good is horsepower if you're not actually going any faster? H2s, Navigators, Excursions, and other huge SUVs have engines making around 300 HP I believe. But I could outrace any of them with my 140 HP car, and get 35 mpg on the freeway. The Corvette has a 300+ HP engine, and it gets 28 mpg on the highway IIRC.

      I don't like underpowered cars either, but you don't need a giant truck making 10 mpg to merge safely.

    98. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well perhaps, but this stereotype isn't very useful for evaluating a country's education, especially since most countries are constantly coming up with new ideas to improve their education system, and changing it. Also, rote is about the only way you can do to learn some things, such as the multiplication table, spelling or Chinese characters. Sure, you can make it "fun", but you can't get around the fact that some things are just simple memorization and there isn't much room for higher level thinking involved. It would be stupid to criticize a country for teaching their kids the multiplication table via rote memorization.

    99. Re:First things by shumway · · Score: 1

      That argument works for houses, not so much for electronics, and fails miserably for cars and clothes. An SUV is one of the worst value-per-dollar investments I can think of (Kung-Fu lessons, anyone?)...ridiculous profit margins, poor handling, horrible efficiency, questionable aesthetics, yet sell like proverbial hotcakes here.

      Also, TFA focuses on young adults (specifically teenage girls) as driving this part of the economy, so I don't think that home owners are necessarily a valid comparison.

      --
    100. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of McMansion I want. Sadly, there doesn't seem to be much incentive for most builders to use these techniques and technologies.

    101. Re:First things by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

      I have also heard a theory that the japanese techno-lust is somewhat due to religious differences. Not so much current religious differences, but how eastern/western religious philosophy has shaped the societies we see today. The judeo-christian view of technology is that it's a distraction from your walk with god or some bullshit like that. False idols. Perhaps this is why the japanese get cool stuff like USB noodle cookers?

    102. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I'm sure you're right. Japan is much smaller and denser than the US, so the costs of many things will be lower. However, it's probably not linear: their cell towers probably have to be more densely placed, and lower power, because each tower can probably only handle a certain amount of bandwidth.

    103. Re:First things by badasscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are just a huge number of misconceptions about the Japanese flying around here. Some of it's understandable, but I'm gonna try to counter what I can.

      The Japanese, especially the young ones, have huge disposable incomes, as a result of a culture where it's normal to share a tiny apartment in the city with other families. Because of this, they tend not to invest of their incomes in more permanent things, like houses.

      Home ownership in Japan is only about 6% lower than it is in the United States. It's a fallacy that they all live in tiny little apartments - or that they all rent those apartments. Many city apartments are owned, not rented, and there are plenty of less urbanized areas just as there are here, with single-family homes. According to UN statistics, the ratio of urban to rural living is virtually the same in the US and Japan.

      (I actually think people forget just how urban the United States is in discussions like this as much as they fail to realize how rural or suburban much of Japan is.)

      In fact, the overall savings rate in Japan is much higher than it is in the United States (though the rate has been falling over time in both countries). So this idea that they just spend all of their disposable income on gadgets is wrong. They actually spend less money on gadgets than we do.

    104. Re:First things by avronius · · Score: 1

      I used to share your viewpoint. Until I had a house built.

      The difference between building a 'standard' home and an R2000 variety (the energy efficient label of the early 90's) was an additional 30%. The cost to build my home was 150k (not including land), and 50k for R2000 took the cost of that home outside what I could justify.

      I could have selected a smaller home I guess, or downgraded everything to pine with indoor/outdoor carpeting, but then it wouldn't have felt like home. And that's ultimately what it's all about.

      *sniff* I miss my house /*sniff*

    105. Re:First things by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse their lack of personal space and tolerance for each other's constant intrusive presence as "outgoing-ness". The Japanese culture is more socially introverted than American culture...so say the social scientists I've read.

      Ugh! All I can say is "don't believe everything you read", I guess.

      It's things like this that lead us to false conclusions about each other

      I think it's you who is making the false conclusions, based on something you've read in a book rather than from experiencing the culture itself.

      First, don't mistake politeness with introversion, as these "social scientists" you've read apparently have. The Japanese are extremely outgoing, and you are far more likely to be approached by somebody on the street there than you would be in a place like New York (and I am speaking from experience in both places). They want to be noticed in the way they dress, they are extremely social (I'd love to see some real statistics, but I'd have to bet the ratio of bars to the local population has to be higher in Tokyo than probably anywhere else), and they are ridiculously friendly to most people.

      Of course, we're both generalizing, and there are exceptions to everything.

      Yes, there are rules of etiquette that must be followed in Japanese society, even among informal friends or acquaintances (this business of "omiage", or giving gifts to absolutely everybody you know whenever you come back from a trip, is one that personally drives me nuts). That does not imply introversion, simply structure.

      Quit getting all your info from books and then arguing with those who have real-world experience - go out and experience some things for yourself. Japan is a wonderful place and I think you, like most westerners their first time there, would be pretty surprised by what you see the first time you go.

    106. Re:First things by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Where does it show the amount of horsepower those vehicles had? Keep in mind that no one WANTS a car with a weak engine.

      It's in there. In fact, I tried to post a table that showed the MPG and Hp over the years, but it got too complicated so I gave up (just copying and pasting didn't work). The average Hp has gone from 137 in the 70s, to 118 in the 80s, and back up to 208 by 2004. At the same time, average weight went from 4060 lbs to 3220 lbs to 4066 lbs.

      But here's the fun part: 0-60 times have consistently gone down. In the 70s they were 14 seconds, in the 80s 13.1. Today, they average 10 flat. Yes, boys and girls, what used to be considered "racing performance" is what that soccer mom who just cut you off can do when the light turns green. You really do get more bang for your buck, and that more than anything explains why SUVs are popular: they're big, so appear to be safe (crash ratings aside), and really can get up and go when they need to.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    107. Re:First things by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Not to detract from your general point, but Final Fantasy 7 came out in Japan so much earlier because it was rushed to the market, and they didn't have the time to get everything finished. They took seven months for North American release in order to actually finish up the game, so North American gamers ended up with a superior product.

      Well this is certainly news to me, and probably to all of the Japanese gamers who played FF7 as well.

      The only difference I recall from the Japanese and US releases was the two extra optional bosses added towards the end of the game. This has happened now on every FF game since as well if I remember right; and it's more a way of rewarding American gamers for the long wait than it is of "finishing the game".

      The Japanese do then get our version again as "Final Fantasy (n) International", which allows Square to squeeze even a few more yen out of their Japanese customers. It's a strategy from the beginning; it's not about rushing unfinished products.

    108. Re:First things by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. Yeah, religion sure brings about a lot of bullshit (like people wanting creationism taught in schools), but all but the most devout Christians in America seem to love their TVs and DVDs.

      I think it's just conservatism. Personally, I could care less about some new technological gadget if it isn't really useful to me, and I'm an electrical engineer. Sure, a few things are kinda fun, but I have better things to spend my money on most of the time.

    109. Re:First things by smyle · · Score: 1
      Where education can be replaced with any number of things, and still keep the statement true. Editors, Engineers, Programmers, Executives, Painters, Writers, Dog Walkers, Principals, Librarians, etc.

      You're right, of course (though I think those of us in "high tech" areas tend to be more innovative because we have to just to "keep up"). My point was that the local school board acts as a buffer to make sure that "the way it's always been done" hasn't become impractical.

      ...and our school district had an ability to attract insightful/innovative teachers. Alas, most (not all, but most) of them went on to successful private enterprises, because the only reward for "doing a good job" over "doing just enough not to get fired" is individual pride.

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

    110. Re:First things by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Okay; but I wasn't criticising anything- just pointing out that in a US vs Japan discussion, criticising rote learning in US schools (as the message I *replied* to did) is kind of strange considering it's probably more commonplace in Japan.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    111. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that specialized training on "how to be a teacher" helps much when you're not teaching people with the emotional development of an infant.

    112. Re:First things by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Japan is not that small. Think California.

      Also, a couple of the most well-covered countries in the world are Sweden and Finland; the size of the US west coast, and with low-density, very unevenly distributed population. Most of scandinavia is as empty as anything you can find in the US - but the coverage is still very good.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    113. Re:First things by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Quit getting all your info from books and then arguing with those who have real-world experience - go out and experience some things for yourself. Japan is a wonderful place and I think you, like most westerners their first time there, would be pretty surprised by what you see the first time you go.

      Are you Japanese or gaijin? Your social interactions will be 100% different from a native-born Japanese person.

      For most Japanese, especially the ones I know, most of their day is consumed with empty personal interactions. Even the afterwork socializing is considered pretty "empty". The reports of dysfunctional marriages are increasing and recent surveys done in Japan show married couples are talking less and less to each other. Far worse than in the West.

      It's a lot of fun reading the popular press in Japan interview their versions of Dr. Laura and Dr. Phil about the problem of being "lonely in a crowd". Especially after the mate-pager thing was introduced.

      Are Japanese social? Yes, that's why I said half of it is. There is a reluctance when it comes to sticking their neck out to create a new interaction or friend. But once they have an excuse to talk to someone, they are very social. But again, I point to what I said originally, the other half is time pressures. Since the bubble burst in the 90s, most Japanese people have been putting more and more hours into work and "self-improvement". Companies would rather reduce staff and pay OT (which apparently they are "forgetting" to do lately) than make the situation more tolerable. With all this time spent trying to survive, it's very hard to get the energy or time to socialize in conventional ways.

      There are a lot of mis-conceptions about Japan and its culture, and the "introversion" is one of them. It's not shyness (and I made sure NOT to call it shyness): it's about keeping the civil order and protecting each other's miniscule personal spaces in a very densely populated country. It's a defense mechanism against being crowded. If Americans had to live like that, they'd also experience this introversion. Oh wait, it has happened: New York. A town that looks plenty social, but it also has the highest per capita of unhappy lonely people.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    114. Re:First things by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      Actually another solution to Fermi's Paradox is that intelligent life forms are very very far apart on average, like one per 1000 galaxies, wich would still allow for a lot ( the Universe is really rather large, after all. Cosmologists think that inflation never stopped and the entire visible universe is a very tiny subsection.), just make the possiblity of interacting with them rather remote.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    115. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it wasn't good...it's pretty good in the US too. It's just more expensive to cover vast areas.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    116. Re:First things by GCP · · Score: 1

      Well, fine, I lived in Japan, so I'll weigh in on this, too. What's been said so far is mostly correct, but I'll add some additional bits.

      What isn't made explicit in the article or the above postings is the issue of generational differences. As a group, Japanese parents and grandparents aren't the gadget freaks any more than American parents or grandparents. Granparents in both places tend to be intimidated by technology, and young parents, though not intimidated, have more practical concerns.

      It's the young generation with limited responsibilities and, importantly, with a whole different world view than their parents, who are the gadget freaks. As has been mentioned, they have lots of disposable income, thanks to their parents' support (even for single 30-somethings), and they don't find ideas like saving up to buy a home even within the realm of possibility (except out in the country, but all the country kids are leaving for the Big City, so they're not saving up for houses either).

      This young generation is different in that they don't have the same notion of a life plan that their parents gained in the days of lifetime employment. Their parents were trained to suffer in silence and work hard for the team, keeping their eye on the long-term, but the young generation isn't sure that's even possible anymore, and there isn't much to replace it in Japan yet except for live-for-today consumerism.

      So the young, single people want a flashy, glitzy, sophisticated city life for now, and gadgets are part of the image, along with expensive designer products, expensive travel packages, etc.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    117. Re:First things by stor · · Score: 1

      "You know what they say, those who can do, those who can't teach"

      I think the saying would be significantly more accurate if you replaced "teach" with "get into politics"

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    118. Re:First things by wbm6k · · Score: 1

      Many, perhaps even most, don't even grade assignments themselves, they farm it out to so-called "teacher assistants".

      Okay, right there you are no longer speaking of "teachers", because almost no teacher (in the usual sense of a K-12 educator, working in a classroom) has ANYONE else to grade their assignments.

      It sounds like you are actually complaining about "professors", but even there you are way off the mark. MANY professors are at smaller schools that emphasize teaching and don't have graduate students or TAs to do the work for them. I wish you had some of the experiences that I enjoyed at a liberal arts university with small classes and professors who actually care about their students.

      (On a side note, the school I went to is actually moving away from that toward more of a research-driven style, but that doesn't change the fact that there are still plenty of schools that match what it used to be.)

    119. Re:First things by rho · · Score: 1
      Distraction? Technology is not, a priori, a distraction. The highest tech in the world, at the time, was made popular by religion, and the desire to see the word of God spread as far and as wide as possible.

      False idols, I can maybe see that. If you'd trade one minute of your time with your family for another round of Counterstrike, I'd say that you've got a problem with a false idol. So, in that case, I'd say religion has a point, wouldn't you?

      You probably got these ideas from a whacko, ultra-secularist worldview, or some bullshit like that. You should maybe get out and experience some religion yourself, rather than parrot lines from the equally ignorant.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    120. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How much of America's poor educational performance is the simple effect of our kids not thinking anyone gives a shit if they pass or fail?

      This is America, the greatest country on earth. Nobody gives a shit about you. Except possibly your parents, and they are usually too worn down by the stresses of a two-income family to make more than a token effort to help. USA! USA! USA!

    121. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      "It sounds like you are actually complaining about "professors""

      Mostly, although we had TA's in high school, too.

      I'm afraid I haven't had enough time in my life to witness a majority of teaching styles; I can only go by what I've experienced myself, by what my friends/associates have gone through, and partly by what I've read.

      I'd love to go to college with some small classes, or college at all, but I still need to save up some money to get in (I'm a white male childless high school dropout (GED, high school was worthless) so I'm excluded from many/most scholarships, at least judging by FastWeb.)

    122. Re:First things by microsnot · · Score: 1

      Really? Then where's Dragon Quest VIII?

    123. Re:First things by rho · · Score: 1
      You were making sense, all the way up there till the end, and then you went all psycho on us.

      So, basically, I had to disregard everything you've said, and everything you will say, because you're a frothing moonbat. Go Bush!

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    124. Re:First things by FortranDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That problem only gets worse when you centralize school boards. Just look at the mess California and Texas have with regards to textbooks. Because California and Texas are each basically one stop shopping when it comes to purchasing text books they tend to set the standard for all text books across the nation simply because of their size. Break those two up into their constituent, local school boards and you would immediately dilute the power of small fringe groups. (That is, it is a lot harder to, say, replace evolution with creationism when the battles have to be fought at every school.)

      --
      "All the darkness in the world can not quench the light of one small candle."
    125. Re:First things by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      You've missed on about all points here, except the first. Japanese people aren't introverted, but there are culture reasons for what they do. First off, in public, it is rude in Japan to speak on a cell phone, especially loud enough for anyone to hear you. This means those walkie talkies would fail miserably. I felt like the rudest person on earth when I first got here and was making calls on my phone. This helped with the first boom on cell phones especially, to the point where a lot of young Japanese people(college age) don't even have an e-mail address, they give out the address for their cell phone!

      Japanese aren't introverted within their own groups, no more than Americans in a big city. It just happens to be the fact that a lot of the time, they won't except or talk to a foreigner who has no repsect for their culture. A lot of american's think this is introversion when its really then not wanting to talk to the rude obnoxious person who is around them.

      There are a couple other factors I've been studying that seem to have a huge impact on this consumerism. The first is the single child phenomenom(much more common than in the US). When parents who grew up in the tech bubble only have one, or maybe 2 children, they can afford to buy them almost anything. I walk around and see 9 year olds with cell phones. It kinda reminds of me of San Jose during the tech bubble. But with one child, parents usually support them completely for a long time, especially daughters. This means that when they start working, since they cannot afford a decent place of their own, the parents step up and either let them live at home or pay for their housing. This also helps in making the girls the drivers of the tech industry here. If you want to talk about novelty, it is espeicially strong with the girls in this country(even when it comes to foreign boyfriends).

      At least all students from middle school on spend a great deal of time interacting with each other. Their clubs, especially in college, are almost as tightly knit as frats and sororities in the US. I missed 2 days of practice for my club and everyone was angry at me, like I had done something horrid(this was finals week btw).

      But there are lots of other reasons for why Japan is so different from America. Americans might wait in line for 2 hours for that amazingly not good starbucks coffee, a japanese person spends 100$ of money they have on a new toy. They both seem pretty foolish to me and they are both really novelty items.

    126. Re:First things by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Its brain-dead simple to rail against bureaucracies and pull some crowd pleasing but ineffective "smaller government" argument, but the problem is a bit more complex than that. Primarily, schools are paid for on the local level. It should all come from the federal level so poor neighborhoods don't have to deal with low funds. There's a reason why good schools tend to be in good neighborhoods (and no its not some work ethic bullshit, immigrant families are the hardest workers imho) its the money stupid.

      Money attracts better beaurocrats (like the school board and the principal), better teachers, etc.

      Not to mention funding is wasted on the American obsession with all things sports. My tax dollars shouldnt go towards teaching some kid how to play baseball when they can't do algebra or have biology books from '84.

      The most effective way to get rid of "bad teachers" is not to hire them. But people tend to know their worth and only lackluster teachers will take the $22,000 a year job because funding is based on local property taxes.

      Detach school funding from local taxes and things will change.

    127. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To note about the 70s horsepower is in the switch of ratings from gross to SAE net. Just fyi, i guess, but it supports your comment more; horsepower has been steadily increasing.

    128. Re:First things by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 1

      They even let technology make matchmaking decisions--have you heard about the pager-like device that they have over there? They enter their preferences for a perfect mate in it, and when they get within 25 feet of someone that meets their criteria, if that person has one too, they light up and buzz so the people can choose to meet each other. Again, this would never work in the US.)

      I think we already have Gaydars

    129. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main point rests on the idea that Japan gets the coolest gadgets before they reach the US, or else they never get here at all, which I don't see.

      sorry but there are gobs of products that NEVER get here.

      I have several items that are 3 years old and are insanely advanced compared to what is "cutting edge" coming out right now.

      Hell I have a consumer VCR with firewire, miniDV and SVHS something that DOES NOT EXIST here in the states and was discontinued 3 years ago in Japan.

      I suggest you actually learn about what is made in japan, you'll see lots of really cool things that NEVER get here.

      mostly because the american consumer is too stupid to be able to use them.

    130. Re:First things by jakoz · · Score: 1

      The relative size might be part of it, but that sure isn't all of it.

      Australia's population density is far, far lower than any other country I can think of... yet we get the same toys as the US... even in the bush.

    131. Re:First things by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, that's not all that bad of an idea.
      The concept of a professor who has to "teach" you misses a fundamental basis of universities... namely that the students were originally there to learn from acknowledged leaders in a field.
      Now, however, University is often just regarded as an extension of the rest of your mandatory schooling. Instead of a bunch of mature, studious, and engaged people who earnestly enrolled in order to study under a master, you've got a bunch of near-children who are at "college" so they can get a degree in order to get a better job than working in McD's (maybe).

    132. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US education system is heading faster and faster into the "memorization and regurgitation" path. Standardized tests are the mold.

      Instead of teaching kids how to think and use knowledge as wisdom we're creating robots. Schools are trying to strictly teaching kids to pass or do the best they can on these tests. After all, if you do bad on the test you're doomed to do bad in life.

      Real education is defined and happens between a teacher and a student. Some test made up by a committee of politicians is not going to help anyones education.

      There are no tests that can cover 12 years of education. Even if there was, schools shouldn't teach to the test. The magical test should test what the teachers have taught.

    133. Re:First things by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been living in Osaka, Japan for the last three years and I have to say that even among Japan's most outgoing people (the Osakans), the Japanese are not as outgoing as you seem to think. The grandparent was a lot more accurate, based on his books, than you, based on your personal experience. I would tend to believe what I read from research first, rather than one person's personal experience, anyway; a weekend trip to Tokyo doesn't count. Remember: every person's experience is different. Here's a little bit of mine:

      The Japanese are as often hamstrung by social structure as books will lead you to believe. A "good" Japanese person worries about not putting themselves forward too much; they also are very conscious of seniority and groups. This largely defines how they interact with people.

      It's really hard for a Japanese guy to meet a girl, based on several things: one, they're incredibly shy. As a high school teacher, I have been surprised to find that sometimes the boys don't even know the girls' names, even though they sit in the same room for several years. Getting them to even acknowledge the presence of a particular member of the opposite sex may be misconstrued as voicing one's personal interest, which is a definite no-no. The idea of using a pager that automatically identifies people of similar interests sounds very Tokyo-ish, and probably a very small, niche market. Most likely, it is used by school girls to identify other school girls, because guys wouldn't even dream of getting involved.

      For a Japanese, the idea of rejection means that they will have exposed their inner feelings, potentially to everyone, which is the ultimate embarrassment for them. Japanese prefer to let things develop over a long period of time, which is why the whole sempai/kohai (senior/junior) relationship is often romanticized.

      Japanese can seem very warm and friendly to foreigners especially, because they believe that we're not hampered by Japanese restraints, as we're not Japanese. However, by that same token, they are less likely to take us seriously, because, well, we're not Japanese. They can be very generous and gracious hosts, but unless you make a serious effort to integrate yourself into the culture and the language, you'll find yourself just as lonely as the rest of them.

      On gadgets: at least in my area, while there are many gadgets to be had, the Japanese are pretty reasonable on the whole thing. They prefer sensible to gaudy, and would rather not waste their money on features they don't need. One of my friends just got his Docomo cell phone replaced, and he always tells them to give him whatever's cheapest at the time (he's regretting that policy right now as it got him a 505i, which was the latest and greatest of last year; the design is pretty much crap.)

      Finally, most Westerners make the mistake of judging Japan based on what they know of Tokyo. That's a lot like judging America based on, say, New York, or Germany based on Munich. For natives of those countries, they know that this is a gross misrepresentation of their culture, as such large cities often have unique micro-cultures of their own. Tokyo is very un-Japanese in many ways. It is a giant shopping district, attempting to be everything to everyone, and failing completely to have a personality of its own. But then, I prefer Osaka.

      I found the article to be typical of the genre; very narrow scope that continues to feed the Western stereotypes of Japanese. My findings? There are only a few things that Japan has that are better than what you get in America; otherwise, we're pretty much on par. America is, after all, Japan's biggest market; it's in their best interest to continue to offer the latest tech.

      Yeah, you can find weird novelty items for sale, but that doesn't mean people are buying it. Were Japanese to base their conceptions of America on what you can find in stores in Los Angeles, they'd be convinced that the creature comforts available in America are more elaborate, st

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    134. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had some friends who bought land and built their own house, doing most of the work themselves. I know, not realistic for most, but when it was done, they turned around and sold it, making at lease $80,000+ profit on it. Of course I don't know the break down of time/labor etc or all the details of the totals, but on the surface that suggests that if you can get land, do it yourself with some friends, and research some good contractors for the tough parts, you should be able to get a good house for much cheaper than everyone else is paying.

    135. Re:First things by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      So, is your idea of a political success someone that does not get elected?

      I'd define it as somebody who reached a higher office than school board. ;-)

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    136. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I slightly disagree with the idea that teachers are respected here - they are, but not as much as in a lot of other countries (e.g. Japan, where 'teacher' is a separate title the way doctor is here). In a lot of other cultures the reverence for the teacher is on a bit different level, (has disadvantages too as then questioning things can be taken as talking back to the teacher), myths, stories and proverbs inculcate values about teaching and learning etc. I remember one of my (American) profs coming back from a stint in Europe and talking about the different respect for the professor there. Also, a lot of other countries do pay their teachers a decent middle-class wage, so it is competitive.

    137. Re:First things by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Quite frankly, I disagree with your assertion that the society in the US is disrespectful to teachers"

      Oh, we talk about how much we respect them all the time. But we don't PAY them like we respect them. As individuals, we all respect teachers, or at least claim to. As a society, we clearly do not.

      But maybe you're right and we would pay teachers fin if only those lifetime politicians wouldn't screw things up. If only we could vote them out of office or something...

    138. Re:First things by 2short · · Score: 1

      "I think teachers are respected, maybe not by the majority of students they are teaching, but by society as a whole."

      In any job, respect==pay.

    139. Re:First things by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's quite the opposite. Creationism is left alone in remote areas because it doesn't threaten the education of the technological and economic elite on the coasts. If Mississippi and Alabama local school boards want to hamstring their own scientific education, what does that matter to people in Chicago, New York, Silicon Valley, etc.? But if the battleground were federal, you could bet that the pharmaceutical, health care, and other institutions would do their damnedest to keep the curriculum in science.

      It would make push come to shove, and I think that would be a good thing. As it is, people in backwards areas are being left behind - with the kind of society of widespread ignorance we see now.

    140. Re:First things by Fancia · · Score: 1

      I may have heard incorrectly; but there was certainly more than that. The gameplay was a bit unbalanced in the original Japanese release; they tweaked some things for the American version, especially the minigames. They also refined the Materia system, which they apparently hadn't had time to do before, and finished up a few extra normal enemies. Nothing too earth-shattering, mind.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    141. Re:First things by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      I wish people would think about what they are saying before they try to rip somebody a new orifice.

      MD players came out in the mid to late 80s. MD Players don't hold any more songs than cassette tapes and the quality of sound is similar to a cassette.

      How an MD player with the limited capabilities of a $40 Sony Walkman, costing $400 in 1987 is in any way comparable to an iPod, which can hold thousands of songs, can be used as an external hard drive, and is $400.00 in the year 2004, is entirely beyond me.

    142. Re:First things by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      MDs weren't regulated in the 80s when they first came out. You could copy whatever you wanted on to them.

      I understand and agree with your point in the here and now though.

    143. Re:First things by iocat · · Score: 1
      I am not a Japan-o-phile, I don't have stacks of anime or dream of dating a Japanese girl -- I am practically a red state knuckle dragger when it comes to culture. But your comment strikes me as about as xenophobic and uninformed as they come.

      Here's an excercise: Go to Japan. Go to a bar. Watch the people. Wow, what do you know! They pretty much act like everyone else! The guys there with their work mates look bored and forced, just like here. The people with their friends look like they're having fun. The single people look like they're desperately trying to look totally uninterested in members of the opposite sex.

      To make a gross generalization -- but no grosser than yours! -- I think Americans can come on too strong and seem boorish to Japanese people, but if you're half-way polite to people, they're super cool. I made much better friends with locals in Japan than in Germany, that's for sure.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    144. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm away from my normal machine so I'm posting AC.

      I am at least aware of the qualifications you have to go through to become a teacher, I work with many people in administrative positions in a nearby district. Let me rephrase my statement: The barrier of entry is not high enough to ensure quality candidates, and lack of followup testing allows bad teachers to keep their jobs perpetually.

      I checked my own school district, as well as a nearby one. Excluding coach jobs, receptionists and janitorial/kitchen staff, I see a K-5 substitute teacher position 50% time over 1-3 semesters, and about five special education positions, hours ranging from 3.5 to 6 hours a day. I don't see a single position that's over a month old. I'm willing to accept that my outlook is unique to the region that I reside in, but I'm not trolling.

      I know a few things for sure:

      the value-wage for labor theory went out of fashion in the 50's because it became clear that you can't objectively determine "value" except through economics; and second, your union is screwing you in so many ways it's not funny. You mentioned going toward your phd. It sounds clear that you'd benefit from merit-based pay and periodic recertification, but you want the government to set your wage? Do you trust the government more than you trust your union? Or am I misunderstanding your statement? You seem to be more angry about my statement of a low barrier to entry (thus amended) than actually disagreeing with my point, that a teacher can totally suck at their job and keep it. It looks like we more disagree on the idea that raising wages artificially will improve this.

      I'm not initimately familiar with your job though, so if I really am off the mark, I apologize.

    145. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wah waH wAh WAH wah wAh wahh

    146. Re:First things by quax · · Score: 1

      Per country I was less thinking of a national metric like

      (country population) / (country land area)

      rather than % of population living in urban areas. Were an urban area would be defined as cities were per city the measure

      (city population) / (city land area)

      is above a certain threshold (for sake of comparison we should chose this threshold so that all major US urban areas - NY, DC, Bay Area etc. - qualify).

      It's not like I can produce a study that applies these metrics of the cuff, but I'd be surprised if it wouldn't show that in all major Asian countries a larger percentage of the population lives in densely populated city areas. Regarding Australia I wouldn't be surprised if this percentage is also higher than in the US.

    147. Re:First things by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1
      I just reread what I typed and want to preface the below with "When I say Japan, I really mean Tokyo and it surrounding areas."

      I agree with most of what you have said except the last part about Japanese spending less on gadgets. I think percentage-of-dispoasable income wise they spend less, but in dollar value per person I am sure they spend more. Especially if you count mobile phones as gadgets. The basic fact is that here in Japan everyone has a much larger disposable income. If you are scraping by, you are earning $2000 US/month. For middle class salaried employees taking $3000 - $5000 per month is normal. I am not talking about expats here, I am talking about regular Japanese people.

      Granted, Tokyo is a very expensive place to live. But when you have the higher income, it is much easier to say, well I am going to knuckle down this month and go without the evening's out, and any extra's, and by the end of the month it is easy to save a couple of thousand dollars to buy that fancy gadget you wanted.

      On top of that, in Japan you get paid once per month, so what ever your take home is is deposited in one big chunk in your bank account. Every summer and winter, you get a bonus. This used to be around 2 extra months salary in the summer, and two extra months in the Winter, but the system is changing and a lot of people I know have been hit in the bonuses in the current economy (note, not in the salary, and I don't know anyone here who has been laid off...though I see small businesses going bankrupt regularly.)

      The last factor is people here are not having many children. The costs of raising children in Japan are very high. A lot of people are either only having one, or not having any children. This will have the biggest impact on the economy here down the road, but it has made it easier for foreigners to enter and work in Japan.

      So everyone who is having trouble with their jobs being outsourced, forget what the "experts" say about the economy and come give Japan a try. It has its annoying moments, but even fervent Slashdot readers get lucky here...and the gadgets rock!

    148. Re:First things by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      Also, when I was in Japan, I was talking to our tour guid whilst driving down the highway and when we passed through some tolls, there was a lane labeled "ETC." When asked, she explained that it was a new system being tested where cars carry an electronic device that registers the toll and bills an account, so you don't even have to stop (think EZPass). I believe it was called electronic toll collection or something like that (gotta love the japanese's use of english)

      She was amazed that the US actually has had this item for some time now (at least 5 years). I'm amazed that the US had a piece of tech before japan for once...

      btw, their digital cameras and cell phones were so fricken awesome... such a selection in every store... but I don't understand why there were minidisc players all over the place...

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    149. Re:First things by indigeek · · Score: 1

      Thats really an unfair comparison. Blockbuster movies and English language games are western world specific. Japanese do get their comics and Japanese edition games much before the US.

    150. Re:First things by Kosi · · Score: 1

      where it's normal to share a tiny apartment in the city with other families

      Ever looked at the rents in Tokyo? 20 m cost you more than I earn as a well paid network admin in Germany before taxes. Then you know why such things happen.

    151. Re:First things by severoon · · Score: 1

      Quit getting all your info from books and then arguing with those who have real-world experience - go out and experience some things for yourself.
      I believe this was the argument that was used to refute Galileo's idea that all things, regardless of weight, fall at the same rate. It, too, was wrong. (I knew if I just laid back for a while you'd see others who do have "real-world experience" that supports my point...also, do you think I don't know any Japanese people?)

      Are people pretty much the same the world over? Yes, pretty much, that's true. But not in certain contexts. In the context we find ourselves in within this discussion, there are marked differences. This doesn't make Japanese people inferior or superior to Americans...it just makes them different. Nothing wrong with that, and I'm not quite sure why you're set on denying it.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    152. Re:First things by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      I mean, sure, some of it is educational, but a lot of it is just flashy toys.

      I think you missed the point here. It's more "they're more motivated into education, therefore they can understand shiny new tech toys," rather than "the shiny new tech toys are educational, therefore a culture that is more motivated into education are interested."

      In other words, they're smarter and more willing to learn to use new technologies. I'd say about 80-90% of North Americans are not only computer illiterate (and they are, believe me), but they are *proud* to be computer illiterate. People make jokes about how they can't even set the time on their VCR all the time. The Japanese on the other hand, take pride in not only owning, but being able to use the latest electronic gadget.

      This is the point the article is trying to make here.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    153. Re:First things by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I wish I had the article or reference now, but it was something along the lines of the Japanese aren't really that much into technology *per se*.

      Note that this *is* compatible with the Japanese gadget obsession; because you can still love technical gadgets if they do something you want.

      BTW, VCRs are almost always badly designed. My parents first video (early 90s; yeah, they got one after everyone else) was gratuitously complex. You had 4 memories on the remote control, which you had to program, and *then* send it to a different memory on the VCR itself before putting it into timer mode. And the actual interface was pretty stupid too.

      My parents later bought a more expensive version of my VCR which had on-screen programming. Mine didn't, and it was *easier* to program. Does that tell you something? VCRs are badly designed generally; it's not that big a deal if someone can't program it.

      The problem is that people (especially Americans) buy on features that shops can plaster over their labels, and price, not ease of use, despite the fact that ease of use would be far more beneficial than something that the person wouldn't know how to access anyway.

      Anyway, just because I *can* program a VCR, doesn't mean to say I like the way they have to be programmed.

      I'm hypothesising here, but isn't some of the reason the Japanese gadgets are more successful is because the Japanese aren't as obsessed with the number of basic features as opposed to overall usability? Or are they prepared to *pay* for usability too?

      Of course, there is always the Shinto religious aspect of Japanese life (Shinto being the Buddhism-'compatible' other religion in Japan) which says (IIRC) something about life force being in everything. (Don't use that in your religious studies homework :0 ).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    154. Re:First things by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      The U.S. usually views blockbuster movie releases first. Many hot game titles are available here first. It all evens out in the long run.

      I don't watch movies or play games, you insensitive clod. (I'm actually serious, I don't.) Then again, I don't buy many gadgets either. (Except that cool Nexus HSF I just ordered.)

    155. Re:First things by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "your union is screwing you in so many ways it's not funny"

      Not in the union. In fact, I hate them, which makes somewhat of an outsider.

      "but you want the government to set your wage"

      No, never said that. Never implied it, and since the concept is anathema to me, I can't understand how you came to that conclusion.

      "Or am I misunderstanding your statement?"

      Yes, I believe you were. My major point was that teaching is not an easy profession to get into, and there aren't a great deal of teachers to fill posts. Your area is not indicative, and I'm sure that if you expanded your search (outside of your county? or local school district? not sure how much you looked) you would find a VERY large shortage. In fact, I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that your district isn't recruiting science and math teachers, as there are never enough.

      The only area of education where your statements apply is PE, but then they aren't usually interested in being "teachers" in the first place.

      Now, that you've amended your statement, it's more accurate. And frankly, I agree with the rest of your post.

    156. Re:First things by ifwm · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not forced to be in the union, and I'm not, but they negotiate for ALL teachers, non-union included. We have to ride the coattails of their deal, regardless of how much we disagree.

      I believe this is similar to other unions, in that non union employees are still under the unions umbrella.

    157. Re:First things by buddhahat · · Score: 1
      The Japanese, especially the young ones, have huge disposable incomes, as a result of a culture where it's normal to share a tiny apartment in the city with other families.


      Not to nitpick a post that I otherwise agree with, but Japanese families do not share apartments (if I read the above to mean "multiple families sharing an apartment"). Many young people do still live with their parents and hence the large disposable incomes.

      --
      ------ How can making people laugh lead to bad karma?
    158. Re:First things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To compare an MD-player to a walkman is like comparing a CD-player to a turntable. Using MD is so much more comfortable (read: "random access") than using tapes, that this alone justifies the price.
      Btw, $400 today is IMHO more than $400 1987 as far as high-tech-gadgets are concerned.

    159. Re:First things by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      I guess some of these can be atrributed to the fact that Japan is far smaller than the US in terms of population.

      More likely it can attributed to the population density. Japan has something along the lines of 130M people in an area about the size of Texas or California.

      A more dense population means less infrastructure costs. For example, just look at the difference between an urban core and suburban neighbourhood. To support the same population in the city you need less roads, a smaller sewer/water infrastructure, less cabling. Being denser, going to the supermarket requires walking a block instead of getting into a gas-consuming car.

      Because the same population requires less infrastructure it's cheaper per person to have dense city living. This either free's more tax money for better services or means lower taxes. The same applies to the entire country. Smaller inter-state/city highways, goods aren't being shipped 200 miles, relatively more expensive emergency services aren't provided for remote areas, etc..

      The trick in NA (both US and Canada) is to encourage urban living. Too oftern people are fleeing for suburbs and this can't but have a negative impact on the economy.

    160. Re:First things by bluGill · · Score: 1

      There are two reasons for this. First, people are afraid of it. The load of the entire house sits on foam! Never mind that is is stronger that 2x6 every 16 inches, and more tornado resistant, it is foam and people don't trust it. (Once the house is built you can't tell, but who knows that)

      Second it costs more. About 2-3% more than traditional construction. (the panels are about 25% more, but labor is less by enough to make up for most of that) If you live there for more than a few months energy costs will make up the rest.

      If your hire someone to build your house you should demand this type of construction - it is better. Most people buy a pre-built house.

    161. Re:First things by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1
      I absolutely agree. I'm ambivalent about federal testing, but the way schools are funded is totally broken. Tying school funding to property taxes means wealthy kids get a better education, end of story. It may create a certain market force (in that parents choose where they live based on school performance), but this probably serves only to reinforce stratification.

      Every school in America should be funded equally (by some measure) from a national pot o' cash.

    162. Re:First things by realdpk · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why I'm so anti-union. I didn't know about that generality, though. Even worse.

    163. Re:First things by jaelle · · Score: 1

      After my son's first 4th-grade teacher told me he was retarded, I definitely lost respect. Some of my teachers thought the same thing. My son was reading RadioElectronics magazine and building circuits before he started school. I ended up homeschooling. None of my kids got anything from school but a dislike of learning. They got over that when they no longer had to go.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    164. Re:First things by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      Btw, $400 today is IMHO more than $400 1987 as far as high-tech-gadgets are concerned.

      I see what you mean, but the point was people's ability, or lack thereof, to afford $400.00 for a device like that, and therefore its never being widely accepted. $400.00 is certainly an easier price to pay nowdays that it was in 1987 even though it is a more ridiculous price nowdays than back then considering that you can buy a whole computer system for less than that.

      Anyway, this is off the mark of my original post.

    165. Re:First things by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      have you heard about the pager-like device that they have over there? They enter their preferences for a perfect mate in it, and when they get within 25 feet of someone that meets their criteria, if that person has one too, they light up and buzz so the people can choose to meet each other. Again, this would never work in the US

      actually, it does work in the USA. it is called Buzzing Vaginal Inserts, and anytime a woman gets within 20 feet of me, she gets g-spot stimulation. it is very effective. no talking, just orgasims. although it does creat more work for the department of streets and sanitation.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    166. Re:First things by Vombatus · · Score: 1

      The U.S. usually views blockbuster movie releases first

      NO, the U.S. probably only ever sees movies produced in the U.S. first. Indian blockbuster movies are probably seen in India first, way before they reach the U.S. (if at all)

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
  2. Disposable income...I remember it well. by lamz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That article makes a lot of sense, especially about the cultural differences. The extremely tight real estate market ensures that people live with their parents for a long time, and that guarantees a higher level of disposable income. I can relate to that myself. Back in the summer of 1994, while I was working at Babbages and living at home, I bought an Atari Jaguar, and practically every game released for it.

    The store manager's wife asked me how I could afford all that, and I told her that I had 100% disposable income. She freaked, and hated me forever for that comment, but it was true! I couldn't afford my own place or even a car, but I could buy all the game cartridges I wanted.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    1. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I couldn't afford my own place or even a car, but I could buy all the game cartridges I wanted.

      In those days, I suppose the concept of "saving money" hadn't been invented yet..?

    2. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
      The store manager's wife asked me how I could afford all that, and I told her that I had 100% disposable income. She freaked, and hated me forever for that comment, but it was true! I couldn't afford my own place or even a car, but I could buy all the game cartridges I wanted.

      which is why your folks stll want you to move out.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    3. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never been in a situation where that wasn't an option. Millions of people are. If you work 2 days a week part time...and pay rent....you don't have anything to save. College students fit in this category too.

    4. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      But if you're living with your parents and working 2 days a week part time and not paying rent then you most certainly can save that money. That's just fiscal irresponsibility.

    5. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by rxmd · · Score: 1

      Technically, he's just reinjecting his capital into the economy. Fiscally speaking, this is more responsible than tucking the cash away under your pillow. What's the interest rate on your average bank account again, as compared to the inflation rate?

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    6. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is true any more than it is in America.

      I lived in Japan for several years (about 45 minutes away from Akihabara, which was nice) and most people I knew lived in their own apartments. Of course, I knew people who lived with their parents too, but that was not the status quo.

    7. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Back in the summer of 1994, while I was ... living at home....
      Where the hell else would you live? Isn't "home" by definition wherever you live?
    8. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point of the parent's comment. This guy obviously could have been saving money, but he instead spent 100% of it on things like video games. Instead he could have been saving money to move out of his parents' house.

    9. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's good for the economy in the short term, but should he ever lose his free housing, he'd be SOL. Despite my inability to do it for years, saving for that rainy day is quite important.

    10. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would put the blame on the parents for not teaching good financial habits early. If the kid ignors your advice, start charging him room and board.

    11. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The statistics say that most Americans don't save much money, no matter how much they make. The US has one of the lowest savings rates of any industrial nation.

      Want proof? Add up your own figures, its easy. Take your account balances, and subtract the amount outstanding on your house, your cars, your toys, and your plastic. OK, lets be fair. If we call your home a long term asset, and unrealistically assume that its value will continue to increase, or stay where it is now (it won't, not once the interest rate correction hits, and removes all demand for 15% mortgages, not to mention the flood on the market as current owners find they can't afford the payments when they renew their mortgage at current rate +8%), just look at your short term debt.

      Your worth negative how much? Much of the US has an odd way of looking at money, the focus is on "affording the payment" rather than "affording the purchase". This is fine, so long as nothing changes, like your job status, or the interest rates. I'm not saying it is stupid to borrow to finance large items, but Americans seem to borrow to finance everything. Groceries, consumer electronics, clothes, lunches, anything and everything. I love watching people do the "credit shuffle" as they try to decide which CC is still in good standing, or has enough room left for that 100 dollar purchase.

      You can laugh at my car, but at least it is paid for. If I sell it today, its cash in my pocket. If you sell your 70% financed car, you will give all that money to the bank, and probably still owe more monthly payments, on an asset you no longer even posses.

      So the answer is , No, the concept of "saving money" hadn't been invented yet. You can not expect your children to act much differently than you do yourself.

    12. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by dykofone · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If that money couldn't afford a car then, it wouldn't be able to afford a car in 5 years. If you work part time minimum wage, with the goal of working full-time with a salary in 5 years, why save up the pennies you make now when you'll have the cash anyway in 5 years.

      If you spend an entire summer saving up $1000, you're gonna be kinda dissapointed you didn't just spend it when a few years later you're making that per week.

    13. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      Not everyone's parents let them stay for free even if they're making money.

      I can honestly say I never had this kind of disposable income. Even for the 3 years in college when I was working 30 hours a week, having my tuition taken care of by loans, scholarships, and reimbursements from my employer, and still living at home.

      And why? Because I paid my parents rent, paid for my phone line, cell phone, and for part of the power bill, since my computer was running 24/7. Basically anything beyond the actual shelter and regular meals, I paid for. This started back when I got my first job at 16, and they gradually gave more stuff over to my responsibility as my wage increased. Of course they also made it clear that if I really had a money problem, they would help me out.

      And I value that, because it made me a much more conscious spender once I did move out. I've never really had a financial crisis because when emergencies came up, my credit rating and spending habits were good enough that I had plenty of room to charge it. And then I had the discipline to pay it off ASAP.

      My sister, on the other hand, didn't get a job till she graduated high school, and then moved out very shortly after, taking my parents' car with her for ultra-cheap. Now, 2 years later, she's in financial trouble and will probably have to move back home.

      This is by far not an aboslute rule, but it is a trend that I have noticed. And it seems rather intuitive to me. When parents require their kids to be more financially responsible as they start making money, they usually end up being more responsible once they are truly independent.

    14. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by FinalCut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Im replying to parent because a couple of its children touched on this subject.

      Parent here was kind of critisized for saying he lived with his parents (cause he was spending all of his money on games) and that if he had not been he could have adjusted his priorities and lived on his own.

      Now, I'm not an expert on japanese (or any Asian) culture - however, my limited experience with a family that immigrated to the USA from Taiwan showed me one thing that was vastly different than traditional American families - they lived together.

      And this isn't a poor immigrant family, they are exceoptionally wealthy and successful. However, having grandma living at home,and adult children living in the house as well wasn't frowned on. The sense of responsibility to family was a bit different than I have seen in other homes.

      Maybe they were an anomoly, but the article makes me think that this isn't so.

      Not only is real estate more expensive in Japan - but perhaps living at home with Mom and Dad isn't viewed in the same negative "slacker" connotation that it is here. Just like the desire for cooler gadgetry is a cultural thing so too, it would seem, is the accepatability of living with mom/dad even after you are capable of living on your own.

      What strikes me about the article is that the Kids aren't helping with the cost of rent/mortgage. Now, I doubt that all adult children who are living with their parents in Japan are stiffing their parents for the bill. But the fact that it was mentioned this way makes me think that it maybe the norm.

      I know in my family the level of family responsibility goes both ways. Once I turned 18 - if I spent any time living with my parents (which I did for about 6 months) I paid a fair rent equitable to the cost of a 1 bedroom studio in the area I lived in. Plus I forked over cash for groceries if I ate any.

      Maybe I'm just whacked - but the sense of responsibility to family (providing free shelter for adult, money earning, children) and the lack of same by the children seems as important to the gadget craze success in Japan as teenage school girls.

    15. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >why save up the pennies you make now when you'll have the cash anyway in 5 years.

      Its what the saving teaches you. If you don't learn how to handle money when you are young, its that much harder to learn when you are older. Bad habits are hard to break.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    16. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      It's true but I personnaly prefer living space and intimacy to electronic gadgets. I get to have kids on my own and to build up property ownership, while shelling out the money on tech is like burning it as far as my net worth is concerned. It is also possible in Japan because they have fewer children on average and not a lot of immigration, and also because the pressure on women to marry rather than stay single at the beginning of their career is much more important. So overall there is much less need for adding new housing units to the nation than in the US, and even than in Europe which is kind of halfway between the two (except that in Europe the corresponding extra cash ends up in welfare rather than tech).

    17. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Hint: If you want your comment to be read by more people, mention the Japanese teenage school girls at the beginning of your post.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    18. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I agree. If people looked at the cost of the car and how much they have to work to buy a new car rather than keep what they have for a few years longer, would they buy it?

      I doubt people would buy cars nearly so much without the absurd financing offers they get. Would someone really want to work full-time for half a year just to buy a new car? That's about what it works out to be when you look at the actual cost. I don't know about other people, but I'd rather take that half year off rather than get a new car!

    19. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest that one of the best lessons a parent can give children is fiscal responsibility through a regular allowance. I'm not sure if a 13 year old is ready for an allowance that covers their clothing and away from home food budget, but by about 6 they are ready for a fun stuff allowance, plus it reduces the I want this at the store to a quick response, "Do you want to spend your allowance money on it?"

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    20. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Himring · · Score: 1

      I couldn't afford my own place or even a car, but I could buy all the game cartridges I wanted.

      And a /. subscription....

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    21. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Himring · · Score: 1

      I can relate to that myself. Back in the summer of 1994, while I was working at Babbages and living at home, I bought an Atari Jaguar, and practically every game released for it.

      Hey, I can relate too! My wife left me for an old man. My life was devastated. I moved in with my grandmother and had no house payment/utilities/cable bill.... I spent all my money on computers, games and beer. That is, until my grandmother started drinking all my beer. You think I'm making this up don't you?...

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    22. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I've been tempted to fix up my old '64 International pickup to as my next car.

      I can probably do a complete rebuild in my spare time for $1,000 and it would be good for at least another 100,000 miles.

    23. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "But if you're living with your parents and working 2 days a week part time and not paying rent then you most certainly can save that money. That's just fiscal irresponsibility."

      Hmm...what I'm wondering, is how many parents in the US would LET their kids much over the age of 18 live at home rent free?? I myself was a boomerang child..came back home twice (between college and grad school, and once after grad work)...they let me there to get on my feet, but, if I'd stayed there on what looked like a perm. basis...I'd certainly would have had to pay rent!

      And how could anyone STAND to live back at home again as an adult? How do these people get laid? It usually isn't a general good thing on a date to tell them to be quiet, so you don't wake your folks on the way to your bedroom...

      I love my parents...and was grateful to have a rest stop in my early life as I needed it, but, I sure wasn't anxious to do that, and wanted back out on my own as fast as I could!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      How do these people get laid? It usually isn't a general good thing on a date to tell them to be quiet, so you don't wake your folks on the way to your bedroom...

      Not a problem in Japan. They have hourly motels everywhere, from what I understand.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    25. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal savings account = loaning wealth to the government.
      Credit debt = borrowing wealth from the government and passing it to private industry.

      If this is boggling your mind, think of what a dollar bill in your wallet represents. It is an IOU from the US Treasury held by you. You exchanged real wealth (your personal productivity) for this IOU. You now hold the Treasury in a debt, on which they pay no interest.

      Since the private sector is more efficient at allocating and capitalizing on wealth, rampant personal debt is a boon to the economy, to a point. If personal bankruptcies rise too much, it creates a serious problem, but otherwise credit debt is quite fruitful for the economy as a whole.

      Unfortunately, spending more than you earn is quite risky on a personal level, and carrying that level of fiscal risk can prevent you from taking additional risky, yet lucrative offers (job with a startup company paying you solely with equity--tough to swallow without sufficient personal savings)

      In a nutshell, save a little, and convince everyone else to keep using credit.

    26. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are bashing him for spending all his money, when you should be bashing him for what he spent it on. I mean, Atari Jaguar?! LOL! What a piece of crap.

    27. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Not a problem in Japan. They have hourly motels everywhere, from what I understand."

      So...a girl you take out or pick up in Japan wouldn't feel a little like a whore if you took them to an 'hourly motel'? Man...maybe it is a culturally different thing, but, that just wouldn't fly in the US.

      I mean, sure...I won't debate that you 'pay' for it from women always in one form or another...but, you just won't get far with respectable women that I've known going to the Sleazy Inn motel for a couple hours....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    28. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Golias · · Score: 0

      Take your account balances, and subtract the amount outstanding on your house, your cars, your toys, and your plastic. OK, lets be fair. If we call your home a long term asset, and unrealistically assume that its value will continue to increase, or stay where it is now (it won't, not once the interest rate correction hits, and removes all demand for 15% mortgages, not to mention the flood on the market as current owners find they can't afford the payments when they renew their mortgage at current rate +8%), just look at your short term debt.

      First of all, my house is a huge asset, so it's not like you are giving me a pass there. "Buy land, because they aren't making more of it," as the saying goes. My inner-suburbs house going down in value is not something I fear. Quite the opposite... I sometimes worry it will go up in value so far that I can't afford the property taxes any more.

      I paid cash for my car, like everybody should if at all possible. I keep a low limit on my credit cards to prevent runaway debt spending (and offer a sliver of security in case of theft.)

      Do I occationally run up a bunch of debt which has to revolve for a few months (such as for vacations and so on)? Yes. Is it breaking me? Hell no.

      If you count ALL of my assets (my 401k, my Roth, stuff I could sell off if I really had to), it doesn't even come close to a "negative" value, even at the worst of times.

      Do I have a large savings account? Hell no. Does that mean I have no assets saved? Hell no.

      Only a complete fool socks away anything more than a simple "rainy-day" fund in savings. Retirement plans offer much better ROI and tax advantages, and you can still partially liquidate some of them without penalty if you become suddenly hard-up for cash.

      Groceries, consumer electronics, clothes, lunches, anything and everything. I love watching people do the "credit shuffle" as they try to decide which CC is still in good standing, or has enough room left for that 100 dollar purchase.

      A lot of people you see using cards for mundane purposes are really just simplifying their finances. My brother buys everything with plastic, and pays all his bills with it. He frequently maxes out several of his cards. His credit-card negative balance at the end of each month? $0.

      By using cards for everything, and paying it all off right away, he makes interest on the float, while the cash gains interest in his account. He also gets cash back and frequent-flier miles. The card companies put up with this in the hope that he will someday screw up and find himself unable to pay them off, but since he is already sitting on the money which will pay his card bills, there's really no risk of that happening.

      But you go ahead and roll your eyes next time you see him in line in front of you at the grocery store, fishing through three cards to find one with an available balance. You are soooo much smarter for paying cash for everything, and he is obviously one of those gluttonous, debt-ridden Americans you've been reading about in your favorite opinion journals.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    29. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The old saw that "the cheapest car to drive is the one you already own" is certainly true, however the safety features of cars made in the last ten years or so compell me to urge anybody driving a car from before the mid-90s to consider scraping together the cash for an upgrade.

      My 2000 Nissan pickup truck had an off-set front colission at 35MPH (each way) when a drunk driver coming the other way swered right into me. Both cars were totalled, but I walked out of it with nothing but a seat-belt bruise and a couple little friction burns on the backs of my thumbs (from the airbag deployment). It was a thing of beauty how the engine compartment gave itself up to preserve the shape of the cab. If I was in a late-80s Ford F-150, I would have spent less money, but I would be dead.

      Cars cost a lot. Extended hospital stays cost more.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    30. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what money market funds are for. There are a very low number of instances that you can liquidate part of a retirement fund without getting smacked by the IRS.

    31. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Golias · · Score: 1

      There are a very low number of instances that you can liquidate part of a retirement fund without getting smacked by the IRS.

      It's called a Roth IRA.

      You pay taxes going in, and can withdraw the entire principal without penalty if you need to (because the money has already been taxed.) You can't touch the gains on that money until you retire, but when you do retire, there's a huge tax advantage.

      If you don't have one as part of your retirement plan, talk to your financial advisor about it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    32. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      No, because in all likelyhood, that car you boght five years later will break down at some point and you will be very happy you saved that $1000 because that will fix the car and not create a cash flow issue for you.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    33. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by coldtone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is off topic, but the parent post got me thinking.

      I moved out of my home when I was 18. I wasn't kicked out, but I was told it was important to go and encouraged by my parents to do so. The thought being that the sooner I learned how to make it on my own the better off I would be.

      So I worked some crappy jobs, went over my head in debt to pay for school, got my diploma and got a job. Things where very tight, all I did was live in crappy conditions and pay off debt. Fast forward 6 years things are better. I was finally able to get a house, and I have a little bit of savings.

      Compare that to some of my friends that never had to move out and face the real world. Most of them still live at home, make more money then me, and have enough in the bank to buy a large house with cash. They are generally happier, and have less stress. Also since they have never had to have a job to survive they have been able to take risks with there careers, which has enabled them to make more.

      Is there any point to going out and living on your own? What's the upside of leaving before your 21, or even 30?

    34. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is boggling your mind,

      First off, hardly "mind boggling", your comments are oversimplified Economics 101 theory, with all external factors removed.

      think of what a dollar bill in your wallet represents. It is an IOU from the US Treasury held by you. You exchanged real wealth (your personal productivity) for this IOU. You now hold the Treasury in a debt, on which they pay no interest.

      Not really, it USED to be an IOU. When the US (and most other nations) went off the gold standard, the dollar stopped being an IOU. If it were an IOU, then the treasury OWES you something (like an oz of gold), what can you get from the treasury for that bill? Nothing. The bill is nothing more than an arbitrary token, that is widely accepted for exchange of goods. It could just as well be lumps of clay, glass beads, or goats, so long as those who use it believe that it has a represented value. If you want return on your "personal productivity" then you must find some way to have your "tokens" work for you (invest them, trade them, breed them).

      Personal savings account != loaning wealth to the government.
      Personal savings account == loaning wealth to whoever holds the account in your name.

      Of course rampant personal debt is a boon to the economy. The beauty of a CC is that you must BUY something with it. Someone just made some profits by selling you a good. Someone else just made a profit by charging you juice on the money you borrowed. And you received a consumer item with a depreciating value. Who wins? It is not the consumer, your left with something that cost you a premium to purchase, yet has a never ending loss in value (with obvious, and rare exceptions).

      This is the problem that I was discussing in the original post about US savings rates. There are VERY few people who spend LESS than they earn in the US. In fact, I imagine that my interpretation of spending less than I earn, is wildly different than what you mean saying the same thing.

      When I say "spend less than I earn" I mean exactly that. All CC debt, paid, every month, no exceptions. Buying vehicles, paid cash, no loans. The only one that I have no issue with borrowing for is home ownership (saving that much cash is prohibitive, at least for your first home). If my job disappears, I know exactly what my obligations are (no monthly debt payments, of any kind that can not be walked away from), and I can restrict them to VERY low levels, with ease.

      What most people mean when they say "spend less than you earn" is this. I make 4000 a month, my housing expenses, and my monthly payments on my car and minimum payments on my CC's is 3999. If your income is reduced, your payments do not change. The car loan still needs to be paid, as do the CC bills.

      I guess the short version is this. Yes, you can argue economic theory all you want, and sing the praises of high consumer debt, and its beneficial economic impact. But remember, the benefit is not being realised by you, the owner of the debt. The only benefit, is that consumers will consume at levels above that which they can afford, so that producers can produce at levels higher than the real market demand would support. The winner is the guy in the middle, charging you 18% to borrow, and charging the seller 3% for the sale.

      Beware the debt monster, especially in the US. The "economic and fiscal policies" Bush is persuing (for lack of a better term), is ripe for BIG trouble. The dollar is falling to shit, the trade deficit is masive, and personal debt is HIGH. If this is not handled properly, the shit could really hit the fan. If the oil market shifts to euro's, the US is in really deep shit.

      I will leave it up to those who voted in the US to decide if this will be handled properly.

    35. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing wealth and money. This is common.

      The value stored in your personal savings account is a monetary loan to the account holder. It is also a wealth loan to the government. It doesn't matter if the dollar can no longer be exchanged for a lump of gold, which is an equally arbritrary token. A personal savings account *is* a loan of wealth to the government. The dollar would have no monetary value were this not the case.

      You are right, this is basic Econ 101, and you don't express yourself as having a firm grasp of the subject matter.

    36. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "If the oil market shifts to euro's, the US is in really deep shit."

      I've seen this alluded to before...can you explain why this would be? What does it matter?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    37. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My inner-suburbs house going down in value is not something I fear. Quite the opposite... I sometimes worry it will go up in value so far that I can't afford the property taxes any more.

      OK, lets start here. What has been driving up the value of your home? Location? The US running out of land? No. Its called low interest rates fueling demand. If the interest rates double, will you be able to afford the change in your mortgage payment? I doubt it if you are worried about increases in property taxes killing you. How many of your neighbours could afford the mortgage payment increase if rates went to say, 12% over the next year or two? Half of them, three quarters of them? Now what is your house worth? There are 10 just like it within three blocks, and they are all desperate to sell. So the value comes down by say, 25% or so, probably more since you get the double whammy of no new buyers entering the market, and existing owners getting out? How much is your mortgage for? Is there any equity left with these numbers? It won't matter, because you couldn't sell the place to save your life.

      You sound like you deal with your credit debt in a very prudent and responsible manner.

      You seem to have taken offence at "savings accounts", change it to "any fucking thing that you think you could turn to cash, from your wife to your dog, to that velvet painting of Elvis". Feel any better?

      If you really believe that your "brother" simplifies his finances by frequently maxing out several cards, then there is not much to talk about. If you have to use "several" then it normally means that no single one of them has a limit high enough for his needs. If one lender won't provide it, then chances are he is WAY over extended. And his cash back, and frequent flyer miles making up the difference, RIGHT. Interest on the float, the whopping .125%? Ever calculate how many YEARS of salary you have to spend to receive any really good rewards? Have you ever heard of a company making an "offer" that was not in their best interests (pardon the pun)?

      I do not remember saying that I pay cash for everything? But I don't carry any debt either. Am I proud of that, ya, I guess I am.

      Now, why I am even responding to your troll is beyond me. If you treat debt properly, you will be fine.

      My post was, "if you are stupid with debt, it will kick you in the face, and according to your countries own statistics on consumer spending, most of you are bad with debt, and save very little".

      Your post says "I am good with debt, but I think your an asshole for pointing out that most are not, because my brother might never have a problem, and my house has value, and if I cash out my retirement savings, I could make it, and USA USA USA".

      Whatever, point stands. Compared to the rest of the industrial nations on earth, the US population saves very little, and uses debt financing much more. Count yourself lucky/wise whatever that you are one of the few who are not in this boat.

      If the posts do not apply to your situation, why comment?

    38. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Chattah · · Score: 1

      Technically, he's just reinjecting his capital into the economy. Fiscally speaking, this is more responsible than tucking the cash away under your pillow.

      That's just an excuse that people use to justify them not saving money. When you put money into the bank what do you think they do? Keep it in your account? They make money by reinvesting your money. So technically speaking you are helping both you and the economy.

    39. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Golias · · Score: 1

      What has been driving up the value of your home? Location? The US running out of land? No.

      Actually, yes.

      Low interest rates made home-buying slightly more attractive, but the rates were low because the economy was tanking, so this factor was balanced out by the fact that many Americans had no money with which to buy a house.

      My house is in a nice neighborhood within jogging distance of the Mall of America, and a short drive from downtown Minneapolis. Land prices have steadilly gone in this town since the Carter Administration. You can't put it all on interest rates.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    40. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Golias · · Score: 1


      My post was, "if you are stupid with debt, it will kick you in the face, and according to your countries own statistics on consumer spending, most of you are bad with debt, and save very little".


      No, your post was, "the people I see in line in front of me at the grocery store are stupid with debt, and it will kick them in the face. Worship me for being so much more responsible than they are!!!"

      I was pointing out that your assumptions about many of the people around you may be wrong. You proved my point by showing how poorly you were listening to what I said about my brother. He pays off the full balance of all his cards every month. He is able to do so, because he already has the cash which will be paying off those cards. How is he "over-extended," as you say?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    41. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Currently with the oil market being traded in US dollars, the US is in the best possible situation from a trading perspective (as far as buyers go, the best position for oil is to be the seller!). If oil costs 50US, then it costs 50US. If in 2 years it costs 50US, then it costs 50US.

      Now suppose OPEC decides that they would like to spread their risk around a bit, as they already own a massive amount of US debt, US cash, as well as real estate etc. So, as a group they decide they would rather have some Euro's in the bank, to hedge against valuation shifts.

      Now back to the example. Ok oil is now going for 50EU. No problem, we will just convert some US into EU, at a rate of 1.2 (I don't know the current rate, just for the example). So oil now costs you 60US (wow, that got expensive quick). Suppose that the US dollar continues to slide, and in two years the exchange rate is 1.3, that same oil, at the same price, now costs 65US. So you have had a $15 US increase in price, even though the going market rate for the commodity has not changed at all (stable market, volitile price, for the US).

      Since the US economy relies so heavily on the price of oil, the added risk of currency valuation shifts can have a major negative impact on the US economy, at the same time giving a lift to the EU, as their costs have not changed (remember 50EU == 50EU).

      Now for the kicker. The dollar lost ground against the Euro, oil prices for the US went up, oil prices in the EU never changed, and the US economy takes a dip because of this. This can deflate the value of the US dollar further (VS the Euro), causing a further increase in the "price" of oil, for the US.

      Think about the uproar that happens now when oil goes up in price. Now imagine the effects if the price did not go up, just the COST to the US went up (well not just to the US, but to anyone using US dollars to pay for the oil). Increasing supply might help (that is how it is done now), but if you have to start playing with US monetary policy as well to adjust the currency value, things can get shaky very quickly (you have to increase the demand for the US dollar, usually you would increase interest rates on government bonds to increase the demand for US currency).

      Basically, it works out like this. The biggest benefit that the US has in the oil market, is having the standard currency on hand. Once you have to start trading your dollars, for another currency, to purchase the oil, you have added another risk to the mix.

      Of course, the flip side, is that if the dollar increases in value against the Euro, then oil gets cheaper. However, with the US deficit spending, and the trade deficit, the chances of the US dollar increasing against the Euro in the near future is slim.

      Politics aside, I think it is safe to say that the US will go to great lengths to keep the cost of oil down. Up until this point, that could be accomplished through simple changes to the supply available, whether that means releasing the strategic reserves, asking Saudi's to pump more, or "freeing" Iraq. But you can't ask OPEC to just take your dollar as a Euro, or to lower the price to some Euro price point that suits your exchange rates. And you can't ask the EU to just sell you a couple billion below market rates so you can buy a couple tankers worth of oil.

      Now, this is way over simplified (as I am sure many will point out), but it will give you an idea of how this could be very bad for the US economy.

    42. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. No analysis I've read has mentioned it, but I'd lay most of the blame for recent highs in oil prices to the falling value of the US dollar. Even with oil priced in dollars, this happens.

    43. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone truly creditworthy only needs one credit card since the issuing company will gladly extend more credit to them. Only reason to have more than one card is issues with merchant acceptance.

    44. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on your relationship with your parents. If you have a bad relationship with your parents then the upside is you get to leave. E.g. a friend of mine was living with his mother who is mentally ill. His choice was: 1)leave at 18 or 2) stay after 18 and MAYBE not have to choke her to death. He chose to leave.

    45. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can not comment on Minneapolis, as I have no experience there. I am in a similar economy, in a similar area. Actually, I am in a high tech area, that had massive layoffs, yet the housing market kept climbing. Why? Lots of land where I am, the city could expand miles in any direction, so it isn't supply. Fewer people working (and these were the big tech earners, not a textile mill closure), and fewer people moving here to work from elsewhere, so simple demand doesn't cover it, there was less money in the economy (direct and indirect). So what is causing it? The only other change, was interest rates hit 20 year lows. Yes, land prices have been going up since Carter, likely since Ike. Plot it, year over year. See any wild spikes? Any lately? It is the spike that can kill, not the long term trend.

      Will your property be worth more 20 years from now, most likely. How about 3 years from now? Less likely. It is not a commentary on YOUR house, or your location. It is a commentary on the market. Low interest rates made home buying VASTLY more attractive. The reason was that when rental charges outstripped mortgage payments, why rent?

      To be clear, I am not puting it all on interest rates. One can expect a real estate purchase to increase in value over time. However, there is a "bubble" that exists soley because of low rates.

      If you work in IT, you may have some understanding of what a "bubble" is. It doesn't mean that the world will end tomorrow. It does mean that there can be a nasty "burst" phase though, where a lot of people get caught in bad circumstances.

      Thats my only point, beware the burst. And I truely hope it does not impact you.

    46. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by scottv67 · · Score: 0

      Where the hell else would you live? Isn't "home" by definition wherever you live?

      Well, I have heard of people who were:

      A) Living out of a suitcase.

      B) Living in hotels.

      C) Living in a van down by the river.

      D) Livin on a Prayer.

      E) Livin on the Edge.

      So, I guess people don't always live "at home." :^)

      -Scott

    47. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by mc6809e · · Score: 1

      Technically, he's just reinjecting his capital into the economy. Fiscally speaking, this is more responsible than tucking the cash away under your pillow.

      I think this is wrong for two reasons:

      #1 Money spent is a demand on the productive capacity of the economy. It represents a burden. Many people are, of course, willing to accept this burden because they get to put a demand on other's labor later on to obtain what they want. But it still represents a burden. The question is, does this added burden produce something good?

      #2 The utility function of money usually isn't linear. X amount of money often has less than half the utility of 2*X amount of money.

      Think about the task of starting a business, like a dry cleaning store for example. Equipment might cost you $100,000. Now $100,000 concentrated in the hands of one person will buy the needed equipment.

      Now split that $100,000 among 100 people. You still have a total of $100,000 but is it as useful?

      Now combine these two ideas. The parent poster is putting a demand on the economy to produce video games (good use of labor?) and at the same time getting less for his money because his spends it in small amounts.

    48. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      As a parent, I can say I'd never charge my kid rent unless I DESPERATELY needed it (like I was out of a job and he was 18+ and making decent money) and had to make a mortgage payment. Pay utilities, pay a food share, maybe.

      And it'd be with the expectation that the kid would at least save some of his/her money (IRA, 401K, CD's) to have a chance to get a nice financial cushion under themselves, because I'm not cosigning loans for them. I consider their education my problem, not theirs, and I'd expect them to do well, demand it.

      I lived at home until I was 21. Mostly a fear of living on my own as I never went to college and my parents never gave me crap about girls staying over. My parents gave me the opportunity to bank 10's of thousands while at living at home, and I squandered it. With all the money I've thrown away on entertainment, DVD's, music and fast food, I could own my own home now...

    49. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by bani · · Score: 1

      let me guess. the drunk driver got off scot free, then sued you for some bullshit reason. and your insurance had to pay both sides, too.

    50. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by driptray · · Score: 1

      Not only is real estate more expensive in Japan - but perhaps living at home with Mom and Dad isn't viewed in the same negative "slacker" connotation that it is here. Just like the desire for cooler gadgetry is a cultural thing so too, it would seem, is the accepatability of living with mom/dad even after you are capable of living on your own.

      I live in Japan, and can vouch for this being totally correct. There is no stigma about living at home, and even when people get married it is common for them to continue to live in one of their parent's homes.

      Renting an apartment is difficult in Japan - there are enormous up-front, non-refundable charges to be paid to the real-estate agent and landlord, and leases are typically fairly long-term. Also, for cultural reasons, it is rare for yong people to share a house/apartment together, making living away from the parental home a massively expensive proposition.

      Also, parents seem to be fairly comfortable about having their children bring people home to have sex with.

    51. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cars cost a lot. Extended hospital stays cost more."

      In the States, sure. Here in Canada, on the other hand... :-)

    52. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by ylikone · · Score: 1

      Your learned responsibility and are a more realistic person. Your friends probably are still very immature and have black/white views of the world. They may be better off materialistically, but that isn't all that's important in life.

      --
      Meh.
    53. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A) Living out of a suitcase only makes sense. How would you fit in a suitcase anyway?

      As for the rest... well... if that's where you live, then it's home, isn't it? E.g.: "I live in a van down by the river." == "My home is a van down by the river."

    54. Re:Disposable income...I remember it well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't matter if the dollar can no longer be exchanged for a lump of gold, which is an equally arbritrary token.
      But gold has intrinsic value!
  3. Some tech I could do without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such as laptops, recognized as a growing fertility risk.

  4. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Ummmm..... by JerC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because they'll actually buy and use them?

    --
    Sigs are for squares. Like pants!
    1. Re:Ummmm..... by curtoid · · Score: 1

      You got it!
      It's a market driven society, just like ours! Too bad for us we Americans demand other uncool things rather than the neat gadgets the Japanese have....

    2. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got you Curtoid.

    3. Re:Ummmm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are more right than you think. The market is more forgiving in Japan for novelty electronics. Just as the Americans seem to have an endless appetite for movies and music, the Japanese consumer base *overall* is more likely to buy an electronic gizmo without a clear idea of why they need it.

      It's much easier to sell something like a combo cellphone/cigarette lighter in Japan than anywhere else. It's the willing market that gets them all the "cool" stuff.

    4. Re:Ummmm..... by curtoid · · Score: 1

      Why don't you call me argoff , or JerC , poster of Ummmm...., or gmletzkojr , Since their subjects all contain '....'?

      Hmmm....?

  6. Grass Is Greener by fembots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why do the Japanese get all the coolest gadgets, while the U.S. is left with the second-tier, less-innovative ones?

    Maybe, just maybe it's because Japanese made those gadgets.

    Or maybe it's just a "grass-is-greener" syndrome.

    1. Re:Grass Is Greener by 0racle · · Score: 1

      No they get cooler gadgets. Personally I wouldn't buy them all, but damn they're cool.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    2. Re:Grass Is Greener by alteridem · · Score: 1

      I lived in Tokyo for awhile and when it comes to tech-gadgets, the grass is greener.

    3. Re:Grass Is Greener by MouseR · · Score: 1

      More to do with protectionism.

      The US is more keen on using technologies, even if less advanced or refined, if it itself can control it's use and development rather than relying on other countries.

      Just look at cell phones. CDMA (American tech) phones (like mine) typically suck feature-wise and in what they can do as compared with GSP (mostly european) phones.

      I've chosen CDMA carrier myself because it (Bell Canada) has far better coverage than GSM-based offerings around here (Fido/Microcell). But the GSM phones are way better in most respect (bluetooth sync etc).

    4. Re:Grass Is Greener by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Grass is Greener? Hmm? I thought the line when talking about Japanese gadgets was "If there's grass on the field, play ball!"

    5. Re:Grass Is Greener by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      compared with GSP (mostly european) phones.

      That would be GSM (Global System for Mobile communications)

      GPS is Global Positioning System, which uses satellites in order to determine your position.

      But the GSM phones are way better in most respect (bluetooth sync etc).

      Having bluetooth has nothing to do with the GSM technology. Any device can have bluetooth. Bluetooth is a Pico-Net: a bit like very-small range WiFi.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    6. Re:Grass Is Greener by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I thought the line when talking about Japanese gadgets was "If there's grass on the field, play ball!"

      No, you're thinking of the schoolgirls again.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:Grass Is Greener by Golias · · Score: 1

      No they get cooler gadgets. Personally I wouldn't buy them all, but damn they're cool.

      Congratulations. I'm not sure if it was your intention, but in one sentence you answered the question far better than the entire article did.

      The Japanese have lots of cool gadgets because they are willing to buy them and we are not. Simple as that.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Grass Is Greener by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      "Or maybe it's just a "grass-is-greener" syndrome."

      No, that is not true at all. Your comment is just a simple cop-out on the truth.

      I am a huge gearhead and have traveled overseas. The cars the Asians and Europeans drive are unbelievable. There is no "grass is greener" syndrome, the grass IS greener over there.

      The main problem with a lot of technology, automotive or electronic, are the ridiculous laws in the US.

      For automotive technology, you can blame the completely fucked up California emmisions laws on why we don't get most of the highest end import cars in the US. Add on top of that the ridiculous amounts of "crash safety" laws forbidding other cars from being imported. We only get cars here in the US, generally speaking, if they are watered down or stripped down and must be built back up to their international counterparts. A simpler method would be to make public transportation in California cheaper and more accessible and teach people how to drive. But that is another topic for another day.

      This is also true about electronics. The FCC has ridiculous amounts of physical and political/financial control over electronic devices and the radio spectrum. If the FCC was cut off at its needs and monitored by an independent organization, a lot more electronic devices would make their way into the US at a much sooner rate.

    9. Re:Grass Is Greener by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You're on to something. It certainly is easier to get something first when it is made in your country. I think part of the reason we don't have many cool gadgets in the U.S. is that we don't invest in technology or R&D. Management in U.S. companies have become extremely short term focused, not willing to invest in R&D and just trying to find clever new ways to sell the product line that they already have (since they fired all the engineers after the product passed beta).

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:Grass Is Greener by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Another factor with cars is the big auto workers unions.

      For example, recently, Holden (a division of General Motors) wanted to bring the Holden UTE (kind of like a pickup truck only smaller and a lot more sporty looking) over to america along with the Holden Monaro sports car. But General Motors faced opposition from the auto unions and ended up not being able to bring the UTE over at all and bringing less Monaros (which were rebadged as the Pontiac GTO) over.

    11. Re:Grass Is Greener by Listen+Up · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. Unions are the biggest problem the US labor and consumer market faces today. Your post is one more reason why labor unions are no longer needed anymore.

  7. Yeah. by Staos · · Score: 0, Informative

    I live in Japan and these Credit Card phones have been out for atleast 5 months. That said, I use one and it's really handy. Riding the trains is very nice since I don't have to wait in line to buy tickets any more. Untill the tech. is adopted in more convenience stores outside of the train stations though, I'll still need my change purse.

    As we all know, the japanese love to use cash anyway, so I feel like a tech like this stands a better chance at becomming really really popular in the US or Europe, where credit cards are more commonly accepted. Pretty frequent to have busniess associates of mine get into jams at nice resturants because they don't have enough cash.

    --
    In Soviet russia, only old Koreans profit from pictures of Natalie Portman stored on Beowulf Clusters.
  8. Moving back to asia by Janitha · · Score: 1

    One of my main reasons which drive me to move back to asia, for all the gadget glory.

    1. Re:Moving back to asia by Swamii · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of my main reasons which drive me to move back to asia, for all the gadget glory.

      The other reason being your fetish for Japanese midgets, for all the midget wrestling glory.

      --
      Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit
    2. Re:Moving back to asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The other reason being your fetish for Japanese midgets, for all the midget wrestling glory.


      Don't forget watching girls slap each other with soiled underwear. ... double check that the post anonymously box is checked... yes, it is, ok, submit....

    3. Re:Moving back to asia by CK2004PA · · Score: 1

      Move back to asia? Go ahead I'll see you in Cambodia! How about rural China? I think you mean Japan, other than Nipon and maybe S Korea, not much else going in "Asia".

      --
      "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
    4. Re:Moving back to asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn otaku, why can't you just be a regular geek?
      What? Not good enough for ya?

    5. Re:Moving back to asia by robgue · · Score: 1

      man, you should think about flying...

    6. Re:Moving back to asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your excessive use of trailing dots (a mean average of 4), I have determined through comparison of other comments in this article, you are user: curtoid. Guess you should have ticked the "hide bad grammar habits" box as well

    7. Re:Moving back to asia by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Move back to asia? Go ahead I'll see you in Cambodia! How about rural China? I think you mean Japan, other than Nipon and maybe S Korea, not much else going in "Asia".

      Same goes for people saying "America" when they actually mean the "United States of America". A guy coming from there is an American, but the country he comes from is not America, it's the United States of America.

      When you talk about "America", remember that you are also talking about Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Panama, Cuba, etc.

      People confuse a country with a continent waaaaayyy too often, although this is the first time I've seen Japan being confused with all of Asia...

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    8. Re:Moving back to asia by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Why are don't all the US slashdotters complaining about not getting the latest gadgets just move to Japan or South Korea? Plus, you get faster, cheaper broadband, a nicer, cleaner country, a better education system if you ever have kids, and a government that isn't headed by a warmongering monkey! This really seems like the best answer to me.

    9. Re:Moving back to asia by curtoid · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Moving back to asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hong Kong? Singapore? Malaysia sorta? India?

    11. Re:Moving back to asia by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      It's most likely you, though, because you are reading these comments.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    12. Re:Moving back to asia by curtoid · · Score: 1

      I was replied to in another of the threads, which brought me back here. I wouldn't care, generally, but the kind of comment referred to is not something I would write - and I wouldn't want it associated with me, and rather than making a gigantic deal out of it, I made a smaller, more diplomatic and logical one.

  9. morning procedure.. by boulat · · Score: 0

    Upon waking up in the morning, Johnny stumbles to the bathroom to answer the call of nature using the household's amazing Matsushita-brand Smart Toilet, which automatically measures his weight, body fat, blood pressure and urine sugar and sends the results to the Sokko family physician via the Internet.

    how many doctors in US would really want to know that in the morning.. no, really?

    1. Re:morning procedure.. by UWC · · Score: 2, Funny

      What the article fails to mention is that the family physician is a 20-foot robot. He processes all this morning information while he "sleeps" in a closet in his office.

  10. In some respects... by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...USA lags behind Europe too. Europe was quicker to adopt the digital mobile world with SMS and e-payment. USA has been the leader in big iron, Japan and Europe leaders in small, creative and applied tech.

    1. Re:In some respects... by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Both Japan & Europe have much higher population densities than the US. The FA mentions the commensurate effect on dwelling space, but they miss another factor: New-type gadgets have to be seen to sell. In an urban environment, everyone will see the new gadgets being used (hence the focus on promoting to the young ladies: that's where everyone is looking...). They can go to a local store to check new stuff out "in the flesh."

      In the US, TV ads (and to a lesser extent, radio & print ads) are the prinicipal way to get the word out. But gadgets are too complex to put together a credible sell in a 30-second spot. You need that oh-so-American invention, the infomercial.

      Plus, all the tech-savvy falks have Tivos by now & don't see the ads anyway. One cool gadget to killing all that come after!

    2. Re:In some respects... by grqb · · Score: 1

      Europe was also much much much faster at adopting the diesel car...I think there only about 4 cars that I can buy today (at least in Canada) that are diesels and 3 of them are VWs.

      I suppose North Americans just love inefficiency.

    3. Re:In some respects... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      I suppose North Americans just love inefficiency.

      Sure. Cuz when I think "efficiency," the first modern society that pops into my head is "Europe."

    4. Re:In some respects... by Octorian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The issue of USA vs. Others on the mobile/wireless world really bothers me, because I feel like the pundits are missing some important factors. First, the US has built a wired telecommunications infrastructure, and we've been doing it for so long that the wireless infrastructure is more of a "like to have" than a "need to have". Second, we have so much more land area and spread-out population that implementing anything requiring wide-scale infrastructure is far more difficult to begin with.

    5. Re:In some respects... by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

      Yup that is definitely true. Here in Belgium more than 60% of all cars sold have diesel-engines. The modern diesel-engines of today even have more power and efficiency than all other. I.e. my own car has a 1.7 diesel engine, 90 pk, but only uses 5 liters for 100 km.

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    6. Re:In some respects... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      When it comes to cars: a resounding "yes". Why, oh why do the Americans drive around in their SUVs? I'v drive a lot of SUVs like the Jeep and BMW X5, and they suck! Fuel, among other things. Horrible security, no parking spaces big enough and fscking lousy productions. There's a woman owning a Hummer in my neighbourhood. She can go on the half an hour trying to find a parking space big enough for her four-seater. Insane.

    7. Re:In some respects... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      There's a woman owning a Hummer in my neighbourhood.

      Would it actually be legal to drive a Hummer in Britain?

      I mean, part of the reason smaller cars are more popular in Europe is that the roads really aren't suitable for large cars (compare with the American stereotype; i.e. lots of freeways in Los Angeles (albeit with nowhere to walk) and large roads through the desert).

      If you see someone driving a Hummer in Britain, it just looks ridiculous on anything other than a main road.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:In some respects... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      You'd be surprised. What do you think about the following:
      • Education
      • Public Transportation
      • Fuel efficient cars (not only Diesel)
      • Postal services (not sure if Euro-wide, but I frankly never heard any complaints)
      • Roll-out of Mobile technology like GSM
      • Roll-out of high-debit-internet connections
      • Ariane
      • TGV and ICE (could fall under "public transportation")
      • Recycling
      You most probably can come up with some more examples if you start to think about it.
      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    9. Re:In some respects... by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      part of the reason that diesels haven't caught on so much in canada is that they don't deal as well with cold weather. You generally need to keep the fuel system warmer than with a gasoline engine. I'm not sure what the available vehicles do to compensate, if anything. There's other factors than just efficiency, like being able to start it in december.

    10. Re:In some respects... by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Dunno. I live in norway. A buddy drove around in a Hummer and was mighty proud of it (like Viagra on wheels) until he discovered that the damn thing didn't fit in his garage, the car port was too narrow by 5 cm. He got rid of it and has a BMW 5-series now.

      Hummers do look stupid on the street. I appreciate the abilities of the Hummer in its military origin, but in the city, without a war going on, it is just plain dumb.

    11. Re:In some respects... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Dunno. I live in norway.

      Not such a problem then; you're only likely to run over an elk or an escaped member of a death metal band.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:In some respects... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Europe was also much much much faster at adopting the diesel car...I think there only about 4 cars that I can buy today (at least in Canada) that are diesels and 3 of them are VWs....I suppose North Americans just love inefficiency."

      Nope...I just really love FAST 0-60mph times...and accelleration at speeds higher than that up to 150-160mph...

      Oh wait...this IS a european car I own...and gets NEARLY 10 mpg....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    13. Re:In some respects... by Winders · · Score: 1

      Try Australia- country with an even lower population density than the US, and yet they still manage to hold pretty well with European tech...

    14. Re:In some respects... by Winders · · Score: 1

      Try asking the Scandinavians or the Russians then- I'm pretty sure they manage okay on Diesels.

    15. Re:In some respects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Canada (Quebec). Between 1983 and 1985 I lived in France. My first impression was that European countries were technologically behind. I went back and in 1996 for 6 months... and the fact is Europe is now more technologically advance than North America. It's not only with cell phones but also with home appliances, TVs, cars, high speed internet connections...

      I guess this will bothers you, but the fact is North America (Canada and USA) is now behind Europe. The golden age of America is now over and if we don't do something about it really fast, we will become second class citizens.

    16. Re:In some respects... by Macadamizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the point exactly -- I don't have any mod points, so the best I can do is agree with you!

      I spent a month in Tanzania this summer -- our guide in the Serengeti got better cell reception out in the middle of Africa then I get on 280 in Palo Alto.

      But until cell phones can get to the 99.9999% reception or whatever the number is that landlines have, I doubt that we'll see the cell phone displacing the lanline anytime soon.

      Plus, I read an article a couple of years back that basically stated that in a lot of European countries, the move to cell phones was at least in part driven by the very high taxes levied on land lines...

      --

      "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
    17. Re:In some respects... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I think population density is a big factor often forgotten. When you get to the point where only a handfull of people would even be within range of a cell phone tower, the cost/benefit just isn't there. Especially when the wire has already been run.

      Same holds true for cable and broadband.

    18. Re:In some respects... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      First, the US has built a wired telecommunications infrastructure, and we've been doing it for so long that the wireless infrastructure is more of a "like to have" than a "need to have".

      How is any other nation different, except possibly "new world" ones that are emerging? Japan and Europe have had telephones for just as long as the US. Jeez, there are still morse-code telegraph lines hooking up England to the US east coast! You aren't unique in that way at all.

      Second, we have so much more land area and spread-out population that implementing anything requiring wide-scale infrastructure is far more difficult to begin with.

      That is kinda contradictory. In many countries, the spread out population is what is driving wireless; it's easier than running wires everywhere.

      What really cripled mobile phones in the US:

      • Proprietry standard, differing from the rest of the world. I got a GSM phone in '94, took it around the world in '96, including several out-of-the-way/backwards places that required long visa applications and interviews. The US was the only place it didn't work! Worked fine when I was standing on the Great Wall of China...
      • Crap phones, as a direct result of the previous issue. Snowball effect; no one wants to make them as the market is poor.
      • Free landline local calls. Tough competition!
      • Pay to receive messages (making the whole system socially unacceptable). Here, text sender pays and I'd say most folk text more than they call. Jeez, ringtone sales alone now outstrip music singles sales! You make more money of a 2-man-hour midi type-0 file than you can out of a CD release!

      And things are only going to get worse in the US with patent system madness. Historians are going look back at these times and wonder how no one noticed the clear damage they were doing for inovation, and how they contributed to the economic crash of the US.

    19. Re:In some respects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If y'all are so efficient now, how about repaying some of those Marshall loans? (Finns excluded, since y'all are the only ones with enough self-repect to pay them)

    20. Re:In some respects... by Ciel · · Score: 1

      How is any other nation different, except possibly "new world" ones that are emerging? Japan and Europe have had telephones for just as long as the US. Jeez, there are still morse-code telegraph lines hooking up England to the US east coast! You aren't unique in that way at all.

      Because the landline phone system in many (probably most) countries absolutely SUCKS, even today. Hence the added appeal of wireless telephones in those markets.

    21. Re:In some respects... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      It weren't really loans, and the Finns didn't get anything. Essentially it was "economic assistance". Look at it the same as "helping third world countries". You can find out in this wikipedia article . It is not called for nothing "Marshall Plan" instead of "Marshall Loans"

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    22. Re:In some respects... by McFarlane · · Score: 1


      Canada has a population even more spread out and is ahead of the US and Japan in broadband adoption.

      --
      [We don't come from a planet. We come from a grid sector.]
    23. Re:In some respects... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Just assuming your nick indicates the car you are driving, I only have one question: Did you really expect anything else? I also drive a European car (in Europe, so I have to pay the insane gas prices) that gets about 25mpg... Which is insanely high in Europe. Mine surely can't match your acceleration times (0-100kmh in about than 6.5 seconds), but the price you pay for fast cars is fuel efficiency. Ask any Porsche or Ferrari drivers if "fuel efficiency" was high on their "what a car needs" list.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    24. Re:In some respects... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yes that explains why finland is covered 100%.

      if you really want to bring up the population density argument - go look up some population densities!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    25. Re:In some respects... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Just assuming your nick indicates the car you are driving, I only have one question: Did you really expect anything else? I also drive a European car (in Europe, so I have to pay the insane gas prices) that gets about 25mpg... Which is insanely high in Europe. Mine surely can't match your acceleration times (0-100kmh in about than 6.5 seconds), but the price you pay for fast cars is fuel efficiency. Ask any Porsche or Ferrari drivers if "fuel efficiency" was high on their "what a car needs" list."

      Well...had the nick before they came out with the Porsche Cayenne...God, I hated that..but, yes, I do own a Porsche 930. You're right, I never expected to care about the gas it burned, nor the price...and I still don't. I don't even know really what premium gas costs at the pump...I just filler her up when she needs with, swipe the card and am on my way.

      I guess I just get tired sometimes of people outside the US going on about the gas guzzling SUV's...I mean, I'm not a fan of them, but, they aren't the anti-Christ or anything. I just think its funny that the most inefficient car I've ever owned is a european car. I love the thing...every time I fire up the engine and gun it...life is good. Now...repairs? Whew...THAT is hard to swallow..lots of money and time in the shop...but, when you get a car like that...you have to know what you're getting into..and if it is worth it to you.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:In some respects... by Pyperkub · · Score: 1

      The issue of space is key. Think about the way that americans love their cars. It truly impacts our personal gadget tech culture. We tend to drive more places or everyday whereas in Japan and Europe public transportation is much more prevalent.

      When driving, one can't use all the cool tech toys, but when on public transportation it is almost a necessity to kill the time. This also impacts the status of having the new toys - if using on public transportation (or in Public, in general), it is a much greater status symbol than it is if it is simply in your pocket while you are driving.

      Our automobile culture impacts this debate in a lot of different ways. We also spend a lot of money that would go to gadgets on cars, insurance, gas, etc.

    27. Re:In some respects... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Because the landline phone system in many (probably most) countries absolutely SUCKS

      I can't speak for anywhere else, but Europe has a reliable and cheap phone system. We've never had free local calls as a whole really though. This held back the internet some, as it was a while before we got flat-rate internet.

      It's funny how these little ideosyncries shape the way things develop...

      Ironically, most of us get "free" minutes as a part of the subscription, so if anything mobiles are cheaper.

    28. Re:In some respects... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I did. Actually lots of fun.

      One other factor WRT wireless vs. wired phone service I had forgotten about -geography. As in its a piece of cake rolling out wire in the plains of the US vs. mountainous regions.

      Another factor that has slowed adoption in the US is that we've had an excellent "wired" system for decades. Its hard to get those companies to invest in something new when they can still make money off the old investment.

      So yes, there are many factors -societal aspects being one important one among many.

    29. Re:In some respects... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I don't know. My '88 Lotus gets pretty good 0-60 and decent top speed, but it still manages 22 MPG average. Of course, the Japanese still have managed to do better at fast cars with decent mileage. I used to have a '98 Supra Turbo that got about 25 MPG and was capable of sub 5 second 0-60.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    30. Re:In some respects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to socialistic government programs which mandate that broadband -must be available- -for the same price- in stupid little fringe communities as major urban centers.

      But mostly, no. The US is legitimately rural. Aside from southern Ontario and the Lower Mainland in BC, we just have little itty-bitty cities every hundred or so km along the highways.

    31. Re:In some respects... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Any arguments about "the US has a lame propriatory standard because they are so spread out" is garbage.
      Here in australia, we have GSM and it works just great even out in the bush (certainly along all the major highways and in most outback towns and such)

      I think part of it is that the US (and particularly US corperations) dont want the same standards as other places in the world so they can maintain control over things (for example, if the US used the same GSM standard as Europe, Australia etc, it would be a lot harder for the US wireless operators to control what phones are used on their service since they would have to allow people with existing phones from overseas to connect)

    32. Re:In some respects... by rendermaniac · · Score: 1

      To be more precise the first thing that pops into my head is Germany. German engineering almost defines efficiency!

    33. Re:In some respects... by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Well, my original point about gadgets is that they have to be seen to be sold. Cellular rollout and broadband penetration are different matters; everyone knows what those things are: a phone for your car (later, your pocket) and internet faster than a modem.

      And on cellular, the US led Europe through the 80's. It was 90's-era GSM, standarized across nat'l boundaries, that shot Europe past the US. Corporate hype of CDMA technology played a part in forming our fractured cellular infrastructure, so you are partly right, but there was more to it than that. Part of it was existing infrastructure in analog FM cellular (IS-54 style TDMA is smilar in concept to GSM, but the design is retro-fit compatible with the analog-FM AMPS). The FCC's bone-headed lottery system for allocating spectrum was another. Another is that the competing landline service wasn't as bad as in Europe. And yes, lower population density doesn't help either.

    34. Re:In some respects... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Point is that neither 25mpg or 22mpg are decent mileages. I have a car that does 25mpg and it has "decent" 0-100kmh times (not 5 secs, but my car is pretty heavy compared to both a Lotus and a Supra).

      A decent mileage starts from 7l/100km, or in the american/Uk format: 35mpg.

      Both cars you mention (and mine) have smaller turbocharged engines. If you drive reasonably, the turbo won't kick in much and you will be essentially driving a small engine which results in better milage. That's the whole trick for having good acceleration times and acceptable mileage.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    35. Re:In some respects... by McFarlane · · Score: 1


      I agree that it must be something else as well. Canada and the US have a population distibution much more comparable than Canada (or the US) and Japan/Korea/Belgium.

      The point that I am disputing is that it is the geographic distribution of population that answers for the difference between the US and Japan/Korea/Belgium.

      (In no way am I saying Canada is "better")

      Eastern Ontario dairy country, Alberta ranchland and all of Saskatchewan you would have to include as large rural areas as well.

      Canada is more urban than the US yes but not enough to make up such a difference.

      --
      [We don't come from a planet. We come from a grid sector.]
  11. duh by nil5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    because we spend our money on the latest and greatest weapons and warfare.

    inarguably.

    1. Re:duh by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      Mod this up, fo' sho'.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:duh by sh1ftay · · Score: 0

      You actually aren't far off the mark. The American government does subsidize high technology, but they 'launder' it through the military.

      You see, because the American economy is supposed to be the explar of a free market, the government cannot directly subsidize high technology business. Instead they do it through the pentagon system. They disguise it as 'military spending', when it is really giving breaks for technological development.

      The difference is in Japan this money doesn't go through the military first but goes straight to the corporations, which is obviously a much more efficient system, thus resulting in their technological superiority but military inferiority.

    3. Re:duh by HungWeiLo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is this modded funny?

      Last I checked, the annual per capita spending for this current military excursion was in the ballpark of about $1,300 per person in the US. Every man, woman, and child - $1,300.

      And this figure was from half a year ago.

      Imagine how many more bright shiny objects we can buy if everyone had an annual $1,300 tax rebate (temporarily disregarding the benefits of paying down the national debt with this money instead).

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    4. Re:duh by nil5 · · Score: 1

      right. it wasn't supposed to be funny.... your guess is as good as mine why it was.. it's not...

      i guess it gives people something to make games about, though....

    5. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod parent troll. If we Americans don't fight the Holy Crusade for Jesus and Oil, who will? We're Americans, we're the best, and Jesus is on our side. Everything we do is perfect and right.

    6. Re:duh by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      And now on my way to the kitchen to grab a kleenex for that hot beverage on my monitor...

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  12. j-factor by jiffyjon · · Score: 1

    Any industrial designer will explain to you: it's the J-factor. A mysterious power that comes from Japanese design. If you need to ask, you'll never understand.

    Well, that's what an industrial designer told me when I asked.

    1. Re:j-factor by blueZhift · · Score: 0, Troll

      Any industrial designer will explain to you: it's the J-factor. A mysterious power that comes from Japanese design. If you need to ask, you'll never understand.

      Well actually, there isn't anything too mysterious at all. More than the government/industry partnerships and subsidies mentioned in the article, we are seeing what you get in a society with its roots in Buddahism, Shinto, and Confuscianism mixed with various spices from other cultures. This is a crude way of putting it, but the result is a society that is much more at home with technology (mecha) in everyday life than that of a society whose roots are in conservative Puritanistic Christianity. Americans (with apologies to Canadians, Mexicans, etc...) are a conservative lot when it comes to trying new gadgets, except when the technology is going to be used to enforce those conservative values like the V-chip and similar freedom sapping devices!

      Thank God we aren't all the same! I can't wait to see what the Koreans, Indians, and Chinese come up with! I was in Hong Kong for a month about 11 years ago. Everyone there was walking around talking into cell phones. Now I can see that on the streets of Chicago. So by that measure, we're about 11 years behind...geez!

    2. Re:j-factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought the J-factor was what kept me up late at night eating twinkies and thinking that the walls were moving...

    3. Re:j-factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep...I agree...my Lexus SC 400, on the whole, had a mystic quality which made the car very endearing, and yet I couldn't quite put my finger on exactly what it was about the car that made me feel that way. Everytime I see an SC 400 I wish I had mine back. I was such a fool to sell it and buy an Audi TT.

  13. Priorities by mesach · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you didn't buy all the games you could have afforded a car/place to live...

    but then it all comes down to priorities, and for some those are not priorities.

    --
    moo.
    1. Re:Priorities by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      That's right. In the USofA most people will trade their freedom for entertainment. Choosing a Jaguar and 30 or so games vs. living on your own.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    2. Re:Priorities by sarlen · · Score: 1
      That's right. In the USofA most people will trade their freedom for entertainment. Choosing a Jaguar and 30 or so games vs. living on your own

      Most people you know are out of college and living with their parents? You need new friends, man.

    3. Re:Priorities by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I work with some people who are from various parts of the country, and what I have learned is that living at home is viewed very differently in different parts of the US.

      I am from the Northeast, and almost all of my friends lived at home for at least two years after finishing school, with the exceptions being those that found jobs far from their homes, and those that were living in cramped apartments in the city. It also took me two years to move out, and again that was only because I found a job far from home (though I did feel it was time to get out). My parents also tried to convince me to stay.

      My friends from the midwest and south, however tell a different story, and are pretty much pushed out the door once they finish school. The feeling seems to be mutual, as they too see living at home as a fate worse than death and just could not understand why in the world I would actually choose to live at home when I had a good job after graduation.

      The main factor in these views IMHO is the cost of living. Buying a house/coop/condo for someone just getting out of school is out of the question except for maybe the top 3% of earners. Even renting a decent place in NYC or its suburbs is likely to cost you 50% of your take home income. The only other factor I can really attribute to these differences are just regional cultural differences. It may just be that since these areas tend to be very liberal, there is less of a divide between parents and children and hence they can coexist better together.

    4. Re:Priorities by corbettw · · Score: 1

      It may just be that since these areas tend to be very liberal, there is less of a divide between parents and children and hence they can coexist better together.

      Actually, it's probably because the other places are more conservative, and expect adults to take care of themselves rather than relying on mommy and daddy for everything. Though I like how you managed to imply that adult liberals are just a bunch of children. Very clever, sir!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Priorities by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Right. Which is why all of the kids who live with republicans want out of the house pronto ...

      Because like most things republicans have no sense of reality when it comes to raising children. Just look how bush turned out. ::shudders::

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    6. Re:Priorities by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Ill see your flame and raise you another word twisting...

      So you are saying that conservatives prefer to see their children get sucked into the renting cycle rather than let them get some savings together so they can actually buy a home of their own?

      Maybe it needs some clearing up, but the quoted statement meant that the views on social and political issues may be less divergent in liberal households, hence the parent-child relationships are better. This was based on the axiom that children are generally considerably more liberal than their parents, and this is a cause of friction.

  14. Well one obvious reason is infrastructure by hsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it is a lot harder to change around cell technologies due to how spread out the US is, Japan you have a dense packed population.

    if we were all packed into rhode island you would see some awesome technology becuase updating the infrastrucutre would take no time at all.

    1. Re:Well one obvious reason is infrastructure by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't just Rhode Island update the infrastructure then?

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    2. Re:Well one obvious reason is infrastructure by sublimusasterisk · · Score: 1

      Greetings fellow slashdot Hokie! Class of 2000 myself. Not common to see a geek with school enthusiasm - how 'bout them Hokies this year eh?

      --
      True believers seek redemption from the sin of death.
    3. Re:Well one obvious reason is infrastructure by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, if you consider the US East Coast ("BosWash", the Boston-to-Washington corridor), and a 100-mile-wide strip along the West Coast, the population densities and areas are comparable to Japan and Northwestern Europe. And the technophile population of those areas is comparable to Japan's and Europe's. So you'd think that the infrastructure would have been built up in those two parts of the US as they have been in Japan.

      Lots has been written about why this isn't true. The common explanation seems to be the unwillingness of US businesses to plan for anything beyond the current quarter. American corporations don't make long-term investments any more. They want to know what will be a sure source of profit in the very short term. Anything risky is left for someone else to develop.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Well one obvious reason is infrastructure by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Because not everyone in the US lives there?

      The problem isn't population or size, its population density (the two together).

  15. duplicate post by musikit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    watch in 5 minutes someone will submit the story

    "Japan beta-tests U.S. consumer goods"

    frankly i rather they do... they spent the money on crap while we get the working model

    1. Re:duplicate post by agent0range_ · · Score: 1

      That would make sense... except for the sheer volume of crap released in the north american market.

      No. They better stuff, and they get it first.

  16. The US is conservative by nature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We want to see things that are proven to work before we spend our hard-earned $$$s on them. If you think about it, this also explains why so many of us stick to Windows, even when there might be better alternatives out there!


    Personally I'm glad that the USA has this conservative streak, as it acts as a bulwark against extremism of all kinds.

    1. Re:The US is conservative by nature. by Yaa+101 · · Score: 1

      bullshit!! Most american CxO's are just big cowards, that is the main reason.

    2. Re:The US is conservative by nature. by dfn5 · · Score: 1
      this also explains why so many of us stick to Windows

      I thought you said "proven to work"

      --
      -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  17. Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could it be that I prefer to not be monitored by my toilet?

    1. Re:Could it be... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Could it be that I prefer to not be monitored by my toilet?"

      The US has a lot more social stigmas regarding toilets and bathrooms than Japan. (In fact, the 'toilet' is generally separated from the rest of the bathroom appliances in Japan. Toilet and bathroom are different concepts over there.)

    2. Re:Could it be... by hobbespatch · · Score: 1

      Many of the houses in Japan don't have central heating. In Nagano, where my wife is from, it really gets cold in the bathroom - so having a heated toilet seat is one of the most wondrous inventions ever!

      Other toilet inventions, I recall:
      A noise button to cover up your, um, sounds.
      More water spraying thingys than you can shake a stick at.
      A leg massager attached to the toilet - for those long sessions.

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
    3. Re:Could it be... by m.h.2 · · Score: 1

      OK, I can understand the "coolness" factor of these things, but why all the fanfare over taking a shit?

      It's a natural function. Do it, get the hell out, and get on with your life.

    4. Re:Could it be... by Daimaou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are on to something. A lot of the cool gadgets that I grew accustom to in Japan, purchased, and brought back to America just didn't make sense here. I ended up boxing most of the stuff up.

      A lot of their technology solves issues that exist in their culture or environment, but may not exist elsewhere. Most of the gadgets centered around the collection and distribution of business cards fit into this category, I think.

    5. Re:Could it be... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The US has a lot more social stigmas regarding toilets and bathrooms than Japan.

      Uh, I remember reading somewhere (I think on Wikipedia) that in Japanese women's rooms everybody was flushing the toilets continuously because they didn't want to be heard while they were doing the plop-plop, drip-drip.

      As a result, many women's rooms in Japan have a little box you can wave your hand in front of which generates the sound of a flushing toilet - that way you can have all the flushing you want without actually wasting 100 gallons of water while you go.

      And they say the US has stigmas?

    6. Re:Could it be... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

      And you're saying that US men don't pee to the side of the toilet bowl so that the urine-splashing-water sound doesn't resonate?

    7. Re:Could it be... by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

      America definitely does not need toilets that require tech support. I would hate to be the one taking those calls.

      I was to Tokyo 18 years ago and the toilets were already insanely complicated back then. The ones that weren't just holes in the floor anyway. I took a dump on one in a hotel and it had 2 different keypads with about 20 buttons on each of its dual armrests. Of course, they were labeled only in kana and like any self respecting american, i had not bothered to learn a word of japanese before my trip, so it took me quite a while to figure out how to flush the damned thing. one of the buttons cause some kind of strange mechanical robot noise to come out of the bowl and when i leapt up to see what it was i was squirted in the face with warm water from the automatic asswasher feature. if i recall correctly it also had an automatic ass-blowdryer built in. that was not mentioned in any of the tourist literature. I would hate to see what the new, advanced models are capable of doing to unsuspecting foreigners.

    8. Re:Could it be... by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an idea for the next slashdot poll

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
    9. Re:Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it could also be that Americans are Ignorant and dont know how to invent anything...........

      blame this on the democrats/liberals/progressives who have turned OUR school system into a babysitter program............US school children are NOT taught how to read, or do math properly ........an example is --

      2 + 2 = 5........its ok as long as you FEEL good about yourself..........this is what US kids are taught........

    10. Re:Could it be... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      But did you figure out the three sea shells?

    11. Re:Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahaha, the same thing happened to me while I was visiting Korea.

    12. Re:Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To this day, I still cannot figure out how the three sea shells work, and it still bugs me.

    13. Re:Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inside or outside? I agree it's a real attention getter if you just go for the floor .

    14. Re:Could it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so hard? One up, one down, and one to polish.

  18. The Article by Atragon · · Score: 0, Redundant
    ASIAN POP The Gadget Gap Why does all the cool stuff come out in Asia first?

    Sidebar: Our Top Japan-Only Gizmo Picks

    Let's call him Johnny Sokko. A deputy assistant office manager and aspiring rock guitarist, Johnny lives in Tokyo in a cramped three-bedroom apartment shared with his parents and his teenage sister. Upon waking up in the morning, Johnny stumbles to the bathroom to answer the call of nature using the household's amazing Matsushita-brand Smart Toilet, which automatically measures his weight, body fat, blood pressure and urine sugar and sends the results to the Sokko family physician via the Internet. Over breakfast, he checks his daily schedule on his Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000 -- the first PDA to feature a 4-gigabyte internal hard drive -- and confirms he's free until noon. Great; he can spend the morning trying to beat the Puzzle Bobble Pocket high score his sister rang up on his brand-new Sony PlayStation Portable.

    Meanwhile, back in the U.S. of A., John Smith rises from his bed before dawn, roused by the crowing of the family rooster. He splashes some creek water on his face, then hikes out to milk the goats. Before he returns from the barn, he checks the suspension on the family buggy and makes sure the horses are properly shod -- it's market day, and if the weather's fine, he might get the chance to ride into town with Pa ...

    Not the fairest of contrasts, given that the Amish actually make up a very small percentage of the U.S. population, but the fact remains: there's a tremendous divide between the average Japanese consumer and his Stateside counterpart. Call it the gadget gap or the device deficit -- call it what you will, as long as you recognize that, where cool high-tech stuff is concerned, America is light-years behind its counterparts in the Far East.

    "I've been going to Akihabara [Tokyo's renowned electronics district] for 20 years, and I'm still amazed at the vitality of the scene -- the number of incredible toys you can find there," says David J. Farber, distinguished career professor of computer science and public policy at Carnegie-Mellon University and former chief technologist of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. "You have stores that specialize in selling nothing but little robots. You have your tiny electronic devices -- cameras, music players. You have incredibly convenient kitchen gizmos. Every time I come back, I bring home something new."

    Japan's trade surplus with the United States remains astronomically high, at over $6 billion; yet any regular reader of technophile Web sites such as I4U, Engadget or Gizmodo knows that the world's biggest exporter of consumer electronics regularly keeps its most innovative and exciting widgetry to itself, selling it only to the domestic market. Cell phones that do everything but make toast (although appropriate attachments are probably available from third-party accessory vendors). Gigapixel digital cameras. Laptops so tiny that "My dog ate my homework" is once again a valid excuse. And, of course, the most incredible toilets in the history of humankind.

    Some of these devices eventually plod over to U.S. shores months or even years after they've become obsolete in Japan. But many never arrive here at all. Why is it that Japanese manufacturers (and, increasingly, those in Korea and China as well) have such a death grip on consumer-electronics cool? And why are Americans deprived of the choicest fruits of this technological bounty?

    The answers to these questions offer an intriguing look at how culture shapes technology -- and vice versa.

    May the (Market) Forces Be with You

    Japan's gizmo utopia exists in part because of a happy harmonic convergence between its domestic market and its industrial sector: Japanese consumers are intensely style and status conscious, willing to pay more for better and cooler features and motivated to upgrade their core electronic devices at least annually, and sometimes even every six months.

    "Japanese

    1. Re:The Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, this is so goofy I thought it was parody.

  19. European cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah it's really true, but even wierder, why do Americans put up with such slow crappy cars, instead of fast cars like here in Germany? (I drove to work this morning at a max of 190 kilometers /hour, about 120 mph) I can't figure that one out either.

    1. Re:European cars by demaria · · Score: 1

      With the exception of a few places in the Southwestern desert, most Americans can't legally drive faster than 80mph anyways. Most Americans look towards other features than top speed.

    2. Re:European cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they don't have speed limits in Germany. And it works very well that way, unlike USA, who would probably end up killing 10% of it's population in one day if it ever happened (hell, a lot of the accidents in Germany are caused by strangers!)

    3. Re:European cars by anakin876 · · Score: 1

      nah, our laws just keep us from going that fast. The speed limits are lower and the requirements for driving are easier to pass. It costs us less than 300 dollars total to take any classes we need and get the drivers license. Whereas last I heard in Germany it is much more expensive. Add to that the lower fuel prices here and you are looking at a much larger selection of the population driving, including more "dangerous" teenage drivers.

    4. Re:European cars by miller701 · · Score: 1

      I very much enjoy driving my German car, but I tell you, much of the roads in the States are CRAP!.

      Biggest reason: we have room to grow , so a lot of the roads are new and poorly built (Why build it to last? we'll have to dig it up again in 8-10 years!)

      The firmer suspensions on Euro cars really take a pounding on the car and your posterior.

    5. Re:European cars by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      With the exception of a few places in the Southwestern desert, most Americans can't legally drive faster than 80mph anyways. Most Americans look towards other features than top speed.
      Most any car these days will have a top speed of 110-120 mph. Some will be speed limited to ~95 mph due to the crappy tires that the manufacturer installs as stock. Disabling said limit is usually not terribly difficult, nor is it meant to be, since the reason for the limit is to protect the manufacturer against lawsuits. (Guy crashes his de-limited car - "See! We told him so but he went and disabled it anyway! We can't be responsible for aftermarket mods!")

      As far as speeds > 80 mph, the key word there is "legally." On Rt. 95 between NYC and DC, traffic moves right along at 80-90 mph, and I've had my car up to 90 and have still been passed by numerous people.

      -b.

    6. Re:European cars by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Biggest reason: we have room to grow , so a lot of the roads are new and poorly built (Why build it to last? we'll have to dig it up again in 8-10 years!) Depends on what state you're in and how much funding is available for infrastructure. Here in NJ, I-287 is a comparatively new road, but it was built to last (i.e. the surface is made out of large interlocking concrete blocks in places rather than asphalt - makes for a slightly worse ride - ka-thud ka-thud - but the stuff lasts just about forever, and when it's worn out, you can patch the potholes with concrete and put a thin layer of asphalt on top as they're doing with the western part of US-1 in PA now). Local roads in NJ are generally in worse shape, because there's simply so damn many of them.

      -b.

  20. Obligatory Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the article:

    "...Johnny stumbles to the bathroom to answer the call of nature using the household's amazing Matsushita-brand Smart Toilet, which automatically measures his weight, body fat, blood pressure and urine sugar and sends the results to the Sokko family physician via the Internet."

    Does that toilet also have a camera in it that broadcasts Johnny's butt to the viewers of televisions in the house? Hey, maybe that Simpsons episode was quite accurate in their portrayal of Japan!

  21. Because they're dorks? by darken9999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As geeky as the average Slashdotter is, the majority of Americans wouldn't be caught dead with some of the lame stuff that comes out of Japan. I mean, DDR? Perfect example.

    1. Re:Because they're dorks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I mean, DDR? Perfect example.

      What's wrong with DDR? I suppose you prefer Rambus. Oh, you meant Dance Dance Revolution. In that case, your right. ;)

    2. Re:Because they're dorks? by ChibiOne · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You know, you think DDR is for dorks, whereas youngsters there would think it's cool. On the other hand, Japanese may think some of the cool stuff you like is worthless or dorky.

      It's all a matter of cultural differences, and these include the forces that drive the market in each country.

    3. Re:Because they're dorks? by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      DDR is a great tool to help video game addicts lose weight and stay lean. I mean, look at the sexy bastard I am now, after a vigorous DDR workout?

      ...doesn't anyone believe me?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:Because they're dorks? by Kphrak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, DDR? Perfect example.

      On the contrary, that's one of the worst examples you could possibly think of. Go into a Fry's Electronics or some other store with a DDR display, and you will almost always see some teenager dancing on it. And there's no one as fashion-conscious or worried about being "uncool" as a teenager.

      I'm not even sure tech in general is dorky anymore here (now take this with a grain of salt, this is a Slashdotter talking about tech). Even building one's computer from parts, once a pastime strictly confined to nerds, is now a Vin-Diesel-esque affair of snapping together neon-colored parts that reminds one more of ricing out a Honda than building a computer. Video games now boast celebrity appearances, product placements, and midnight openings.

      Let's face it. The guys who stuffed us in lockers and stole our lunch money back in the 80s came back, and this time they stole our nerdy hobbies. What was once geeky is now cool. Even here in the US.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    5. Re:Because they're dorks? by Lizard_King · · Score: 1

      As geeky as the average Slashdotter is, the majority of Americans wouldn't be caught dead with some of the lame stuff that comes out of Japan

      Insightul? Nice troll. The fact is that most Americans receive this "lame stuff" from Japan months, if not years, after it was mainstream in Japan at which point it becomes popular in the US. I'm jealous that they have the Playstation handheld over there... certainly not lame.

      --
      "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
    6. Re:Because they're dorks? by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      I feel obliged:

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?date=2004-11 -08&res=l

      Oh yes. Quite relevant.

  22. Why? Let me tell you ... by jeff13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... having lived in Japan and been to Akihabara I can tell you it's easy to have far more product, and far better quality product, in Japan because it has a massive population on a place the size of Nova Scotia.

    With housing costs so high people live with family and have lots of spending money. Money to get this years new "whatever" model.

    Wakata?

    I didn't bother to read the article. I lived it.

    1. Re:Why? Let me tell you ... by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 1

      Wakarimashu Ka.

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    2. Re:Why? Let me tell you ... by mkeroppi · · Score: 1

      There are many reasons, but population is one of them. Another one is that Japanese WILL spend because they can. Remember, producers will make money only because there's a consumer market. Don't have a market, why not create one yourself.

  23. no shit! by hicham · · Score: 1, Insightful

    no whining! europeans get 'em even later. AND your mass-produced hollywood "blockbusters" AND the new and "kewl" computer games BUT (sadly) we do get new and more absurd american copyright laws about every half a year :(

    1. Re:no shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BUT (sadly) we do get new and more absurd american copyright laws about every half a year :(

      Except when you get our absurd copyright laws BEFORE we do.

  24. The Amish don't have urine sugar sensing toilets! by scotay · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do the Mennonites get all the good stuff first?

  25. That's it by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    I'm moving to Japan.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:That's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but don't forget your parents have to move to Japan as well. You'll need to move back in with them to be able to afford it.

    2. Re:That's it by bandrzej · · Score: 1

      Same here. I have my own car, apartment, and make good $$, and I'm no where near close to their electronic toys. Of course, this is all of our own fault for A-bombing and carpet bombing Japan. Japan had to rebuild almost everything from nothing...while the US just lived in our existing infrasturctures and *slowly* upgraded. Just like Europe, but only with more $$ support. Read a history book! :-)

      --

      LainTheWired = isgod( int Lain, int denial, float truth)

    3. Re:That's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > US just lived in our existing infrasturctures
      *snip*
      > Just like Europe, but only with more $$ support.

      Yes, read a fscking history book. Europe got carpet bombed too, just like Japan (and we don't have the same high-tech infrastructure that Japan has). May not have been any A-bombs on Germany, but there's no point A-bombing the rubble left from carpet bombing.

      BTW, Europe is that kind of medium sized green thing just north of Africa. And Africa is... oh never mind; just stick to talking about US-centric subjects.

    4. Re:That's it by akeyes · · Score: 1
      I'm moving to Japan.

      By way of Canada?

    5. Re:That's it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW, Europe is that kind of medium sized green thing just north of Africa. And Africa is... oh never mind; just stick to talking about US-centric subjects.

      Ooooh you Euro-centric fascist, why don't you give the location of Europe in relation to Antarctica, hmm, why not? Cause you suck!

    6. Re:That's it by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, they attacked us first. I'll go check again....
      ....
      Yep, there it is. Pearl Harbor.

    7. Re:That's it by bandrzej · · Score: 1

      I left out of the "just like europe" comment in referencing Japan, not the US, you incensitive clod!

      --

      LainTheWired = isgod( int Lain, int denial, float truth)

  26. It's all about tradeoffs - by Omkar · · Score: 1

    How about the space defecit? You know, the fact that Americans seem to have much more room to live in? Comparing national mores is hard, subjective, and, in the end, usually pointless.

    1. Re:It's all about tradeoffs - by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      what good does this space to me if i am shoot for moving on it?

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    2. Re:It's all about tradeoffs - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans tend to need more space too with all that extra bodyfat... (and even w/o that they're on average naturally bigger than the japs)
      But hey, given the choice between cool gadgets and ample space to live in and privacy, I'll always take the later. Gadgets are nifty, but I really don't like feeling cramped and crowded all the time. And there's plenty of gadgets to go around anyway, even if they're not the lastest models and integrated like crazy.
      For myself, all I really need is a nice quiet place, lots and lots of books to read, boardgames, a computer or two and a fast network connection. Stereo and TV optional.

  27. It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe... by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least we can import Japanese technology. Customs won't confiscate something for not complying with FCC regulations, but they will confiscate food!

    In Europe you're allowed to make and sell things that contain non-pasturized dairy products. In the US, you're not. Apparently americans aren't allowed to determine for themselves what is or isn't an acceptable risk. So the best European young cheeses and chocolates have poor substitutes as their namesakes in the US.

    To make matters worse, they've convinced people here that "ultra-pasturized" means "better", even though it just means they used extra high temperatures to get it done more quickly and save money at the expense of flavor. That means the milk here doesn't taste nearly as good as it could under the current regulations. All this in the name of safety, yet at the same time, you can't get irradiated beef...

    Sigh.

  28. foreign cars are always cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan always gets the cool cars first and sometimes they get them exclusively. For instance, the Skyline, which would by many predictions sell like hotcakes in the states and the STI. Its not just Japan either (as with SMS mentioned earlier), Australia also gets the cooler cars...think Ford Falcon.

    1. Re:foreign cars are always cooler by _avs_007 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Skyline is available in the states right now, as the Infiniti G35.

      Part of the reason japan doesn't import it's cars here, is because the US, actually has some of the most stringent regulations when it comes to safety/emissions equipment. The R34 skyline wasn't imported into the US, because Nissan said that to convert the right hand drive skyline to a left hand drive model wasn't possible, because the necessary emissions equipment required in the US wouldn't fit on the opposite side of the engine compartment. It couldn't be relocated, unless the engine was redesigned either.

      The Euro E36 M3 was only 240hp in the states and 280hp in Europe, because the 280hp EuroM3 didn't pass US emissions.

      Some manufacturers also claimed not to import their supercars, becuase the US doesn't have low-sulfer gasoline yet, so it supposedly wouldn't work correctly.

      Now lets look at the Holden Commodore which was imported into the states as the Pontiac GTO. You'll notice that the aussie version has a 14 cubic foot trunk, but the US version only has a 7 cubic foot trunk. It's because US safety regultions required relocation of the fuel tank, which ate up the trunk space. The aussie fuel tank is in the back under the bumper.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Re:Ob. South Park Ref. by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Funny

    Japanese guy: "Yes, We may have best gadgets, but you Americans have bigga penis"

    Judging by all the Hummer II's I've been seeing, not so much.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  31. OT: security Flaw in Linux image handling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://news.com.com/Linux+groups+patch+image+flaw/ 2100-1002_3-5484080.html?tag=nefd.top

  32. Smart toilet. by titusjan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Johnny stumbles to the bathroom to answer the call of nature using the household's amazing Matsushita-brand Smart Toilet, which automatically measures his weight, body fat, blood pressure and urine sugar and sends the results to the Sokko family physician via the Internet.

    "Your urine contains traces of an illegal subtance. The bathroom door has been locked and the police has been notified. Please remain seated until they arrive.

    Thank you for using Matsushita."

    1. Re:Smart toilet. by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      And followed up by the most terrible of all directives:

      "The flushing mechanism on this device has also been disabled."

      "Noooooo!!!"

    2. Re:Smart toilet. by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

      Thank you for using Matsushita.
      I think you meant Mastashita.

    3. Re:Smart toilet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha! and people think I'm disgusting for peeing in the shower. I'm just ready for the new world order.
      ---
      In Future Japan, the toilet pees on you!

    4. Re:Smart toilet. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the new smart shower gets installed ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:Smart toilet. by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      We need a "+0.5 Funny (Bathroom Humor)" moderation option.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    6. Re:Smart toilet. by justins · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the version with the V-chip.

      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    7. Re:Smart toilet. by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

      Is it me or are the best toilets the ones made many years ago? I hate those water saver jobs that always clog and take many flushes to get everything to go away. My house was built in 1953 (good american post war construction they didn't just use pieces of wood -- they used entire trees! I guess they were concerned with houses lasting through a nuclear war or something) and the original toilets are awesome!! I suppose that I should be more concerned about water usage but I live in Maryland where water is insanely cheap. Anyway you can ... um ... eat whatever you want and it doesn't matter how much TP you use everything always goes in the correct direction. I will never give up my niagara falls inspired bathroom! Don't get my started on the sinks and bathtubs. Fiber glass? You call that a tub?

    8. Re:Smart toilet. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      Hah. Hardly. One trip to the local BBQ joint and the toilet would just say:
      "I apologize - please don't ever assult me like that again.." :)

    9. Re:Smart toilet. by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Some of the new pressure-assisted or vacuum-assisted water saving toilets do a great job of...cutting the crap. It took a while, but eventually the technology caught up to the legislation.

    10. Re:Smart toilet. by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Actually I only recently installed my new toilet and while it only use 4 liters for low flush, 6 liters for full flush, it does the job extremely well and never had a problem - and that type of toilet is quite common. It replaced the old 1930's toilet I had, it had a huge ceramic tank about 7 foot off the floor. No difference really in flushing efficency, in fact I found the new one to do the job better. Tho I'd suspect it would be a little less reliable than the bog standard mechanical flush toilet as it's pneumatic and stuff.

      As for water bills, my water bills are a fixed amount per year so I can use as much water as I want and I won't be charged a penny extra. No water meter or anything here. Yet I still want to save on water ;) But then again I've got a 400 litre bath, so I can't speak about water savings I guess ;)

    11. Re:Smart toilet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The toilet I had in Japan had the water filling up the cistern first going through a faucet on the top of the cistern, built in. Thus when you washed your hands the water you used would be used a second time next time you flushed the toilet.

      Not only clever but necessary during water shortages.

  33. In a nutshell ... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The article says that Americans don't get the gadgets because we

    1) don't really want them very badly, and
    2) don't have the infrastructure to support most of them (see (1)).

    The Japanese are largely status-seeking early-adopters, says the article, while most Americans just don't care. Fewer Americans are early adopters, and those of us who are into conspicuous consumption prefer non-technological money wasters, like big houses, Persian rugs, and so on.

    I'd say that most Americans I've met resemble those remarks.

    There. Now you don't have to waste any time reading the article.

    1. Re:In a nutshell ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There. Now you don't have to waste any time reading the article.

      Oh, I don't think you have to worry about that, anyway.

    2. Re:In a nutshell ... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      1) don't really want them very badly

      That is it. Its a cultural difference.

      Japanese are fanatics about thier elecronics. I had a Japanese friend from college and the last time I saw him, I guess he was 23 to 25 years old, and he and his girlfriend came to visit me and they had these little goofy digital pedometers that looked kinda like those pikachu (sp? whatever those things are) character guys or a cute little cat or something.

      This was just a pedometer that counted steps. But these things had little messages that corresponded to I think the time of day and how much you walked, and they had little sayings on their LCD screens, and he and his girlfriend would compare and share what they said and laugh and giggle at them.

      I didn't know his girlfriend, but I lived with the guy, and I knew him pretty well. He was not a geek. Not into computers, not engineering minded, I believe he was a business major, don't remember.

      Another example that I saw on TV was with camera phones. We don't really want them here. I know noone that has one. We knock them all the time here on /. We say, I just want a phone dammit!

      So, I was watching some show and Avril Lavine was doing a tour in Japan and she was doing something like walking from point A to B, and I saw a flood of phones up in the air taking pictures. I immediatly thought to myself, "Wow, that is where all that extra feature crap comes from. Some people actually like this stuff."

      Also, you know the stereotyped Japanese tourist taking pictures all the time :)

      The Japanese are largely status-seeking early-adopters, says the article, while most Americans just don't care. Fewer Americans are early adopters, and those of us who are into conspicuous consumption prefer non-technological money wasters, like big houses, Persian rugs, and so on.

      Americans are early adaptors in things like music, movies, and fashion. Yeah, we can buy big houses here. Its difficult to find land for a place to live in Japan. Everything is smaller there like those pod type hotel rooms. That would not fly at all here in the US.

      I've noticed similar kinds of cultural behavior with other Asian countries like Korea. They have these crazy robot toys (something I saw here on /. at some time ago). We Americans like toys that blow stuff up :)

  34. Perspective by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 2, Funny

    True, but let's put this into perspective.
    Pentium Xeon, Itanic, AMD-64 with Hypertransport, PowerPC, Sparc...

    Windows 2003, OSX, FreeBSD, Solaris, AIX, OS390...

    SQLServer, DB2, Oracle, Informix...

    AS400, S390, Clariion, E15000...

    Ford F-350, Chevy CK 3500, Dodge Hemmy Ram...

    John Deere, Navistar, Cummings Diesel...

    NASCAR, Bass Fishing, NCAA Tournament, Superbowl, Budweiser, Miller, Hot Chicks...

    I mean - it's not like we don't have some cool toys of our own.

    [Ours just aren't quite so damned gay...]

    1. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ford F-350, Chevy CK 3500, Dodge Hemmy Ram...

      John Deere, Navistar, Cummings Diesel...

      NASCAR, Bass Fishing, NCAA Tournament, Superbowl, Budweiser, Miller, Hot Chicks,Windows 2003, OSX


      Yeah these are real cool inovative technologies. How old is the Hemi? 30 years old?
      trucks & sports are the Biggest waste of Time since TV. I'd rather get run over by a nascar then have to watch them go around in circles ad infinitum.

    2. Re:Perspective by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Bass Fishing cool

      Mark this date down, people! That may be the only time you'll ever see the words "Bass" "Fishing" and "cool" in the same phrase or paragraph.

      Oh, you forgot Bowling and Professional Wrestling.

    3. Re:Perspective by beerits · · Score: 3, Informative

      Professional Wrestling
      Professional Wrestling is more popular in Japan than it is in the United States.

    4. Re:Perspective by Kirth · · Score: 1

      Budweiser, Miller
      Yeah, you've got cool toys too, but too bad you don't have beer ;)).

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    5. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Budweiser, Miller, Hot Chicks...
      ???

      You must be joking

    6. Re:Perspective by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The beer makes not having the cool toys a lot better. Without Beer activites such as watching baseball, Bass Fishing, ... would be unbarable.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Perspective by Golias · · Score: 1

      We have beer, but the typical NASCAR fan doesn't know about it.

      I would put Schmalt's Alt (from Schell Brewery in New Ulm, Minnesota) against 90% of what they serve in .ch

      Anchor Steam, made in San Francisco, is also a real treat if you like a dark beer.

      Samuel Adams Boston Lager gets a "mostly okay" rating, though it pales in comparison to some of the better beers I've had from central Europe.

      Budweiser is not really beer. It's made with rice. This is not intended as flamebait directed at Bud drinkers. It would be illegal to label that stuff as "Beer" in many nations around the world.

      Miller comes closer to using the right ingredients, but it tastes terrible and smells worse. Foreigners weep for us when they taste it. Even Mexicans, who produce genuinely terrible beers, must wonder how it sells.

      The real crying shame is that it's nearly impossible, in most US cities, to get a pint of Guiness served at the correct temperature. Pubs here don't know how to store it, and don't know how to pour it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Perspective by warpSpeed · · Score: 1
      ...Beer activites...

      The best beer activity that I know of is making more beer (homebrew). All that sports stuff is unbarable with or with out the beer.

    9. Re:Perspective by scottv67 · · Score: 0

      >Ford F-350, Chevy CK 3500, Dodge Hemmy Ram...

      Hemmy? Where the hell did you learn to spell? Did you make it past the fourth grade? Even fourth graders know how to write the first four letters of the word "hemispherical".

      Sheesh!

      -Scott

    10. Re:Perspective by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      Ford F-350, Chevy CK 3500, Dodge Hemmy Ram...

      John Deere, Navistar, Cummings Diesel...


      i think that the words "toyota", "honda", "mitsubishi", and "hitachi" must be missing from your vocab.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    11. Re:Perspective by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Have to agree on the American "beer".

      I think my favorite here so far as been a locally made oatmeal vanilla stout. Insanely great stuff. As for the rest of it, I usually only do the micro brews if I drink it at all.

      To be honest, I generally perfer a good cider to beer because the beer here is horrid.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    12. Re:Perspective by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > I would put Schmalt's Alt (from Schell Brewery in New Ulm, Minnesota) against 90% of what they serve in .ch

      I think the Swiss have pretty decent beer. Perhaps you meant .cn?

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    13. Re:Perspective by radish · · Score: 1

      Ford F-350, Chevy CK 3500, Dodge Hemmy Ram...

      John Deere, Navistar, Cummings Diesel...

      NASCAR, Bass Fishing, NCAA Tournament, Superbowl, Budweiser, Miller

      I think I'm moving to Japan...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    14. Re:Perspective by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Professional Wrestling is more popular in Japan than it is in the United States.

      Gee, I wonder why that is....

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    15. Re:Perspective by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Dodge Hemmy Ram

      It's Hemi, H-E-M-I, as in Hemispherical Engine Block. Only one "M" and no "Y".

      Though you left out the best use for the Hemi.

      And don't forget, it's deer season in most of the US right now. Who in Japan would ever get the chance to bag an 8 pointer in their home country?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    16. Re:Perspective by corbettw · · Score: 1

      The trick to finding good American beer is just ignore the Big Three (Bud, Miller, Coors), and their bastard step-children. Any section of the country is going to have good local brews, you just have to search them out.

      California has Steel Head, Anchor Steam, Sierra Nevada, and plenty others. Texas has Shiner and Ziegenbock. Lousiana has Abita. There are dozens more, but those the ones that immediately pop to mind. The point is that people have to remember that the US is a nation as large as all of Europe combined, at least in terms of geography. Saying America has no good beer because only the crap gets exported is like saying Europe has no good wine, when you've only tried ones from Poland.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    17. Re:Perspective by Golias · · Score: 1

      Look at the header of the parent to my post. A .ch URL is featured.

      Since I was replying to a Swiss criticism of American beer, the comparison is fair game.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Perspective by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      You, sir, have obviously never sat on the gloriously calm ocean on a great fall day drinking beers, reeling in a jig full of meter-long sea bass, drank another beer, gutted your fish, drank another beer, caught another two-dozen bass but had to throw em back because they're a centimeter or two too small, gone home, fried em up on the barby, laid the pipe in the poor wife next door who's hubby is more interested in golf than her and had another beer before sitting down to watch the Patriots work up to yet another Superbowl win... :-)

      Bowling is NEVER cool unless your playing with a squad of naked cheerleaders.

    19. Re:Perspective by Golias · · Score: 1

      A friend in the National Guard brought back a crate of various premium beers from Germany.

      Don't get me wrong... Sierra Nevada is a pretty darn good American beer... but after drinking the really good stuff; the stuff the Germans choose not to export to us; the Sierra Nevada we switched to after running out tasted like bitter pine needles to me by comparisson.

      Many of the widely-distributed "mircro brews" (which are often made in the same breweries as the Big Three on a contract basis to reduce shipping costs) manage to be "okay" beer. Stuff like Shiner and Anchor Steam even manage to be "good enough."

      However, when it comes to easy access to genuinely outstanding beer, we live in poverty.

      That said, we don't get enough credit for the good beer we have, because most European visitors find themselves in bars which only pour stuff like Bud Lite and Old Milwaukee. What would you expect them to think? As bad as they are, these beers are actually quite popular over here.

      Also, for the record, I have never tried wine from Poland, but it seems to me they would be able to make some rather interesting whites, if the German Reislings are anything to guess by.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    20. Re:Perspective by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      But the Japanese have yet to consistantly make a truck worth a damn is what he's saying. That may change, but if you need to haul, the American's still have the Janpanese beat.

    21. Re:Perspective by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Also, for the record, I have never tried wine from Poland, but it seems to me they would be able to make some rather interesting whites, if the German Reislings are anything to guess by.

      Maybe, but they're not known for it. Europe has some great wines that come from France, Belgium, Germany, Italy, and Spain. But if you judged the whole country by the wine from one province that wasn't very good, you'd be doing a disservice to those others I just mentioned. Same thing with judging all American beers harshly by the swill that gets passed off as "American beer" overseas.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    22. Re:Perspective by Golias · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. I've been buying a lot of Italian reds lately (because the secret is out on the Australian Shiraz, and you can no longer get outstanding Ozzy wine for seven bucks. Former el-cheapo labels like Black Opal now usually cost $12-$18 in retail liquer stores.)

      I've found that some of the wine from Italy is extremely good, and some of it is paint thinner. It's a real gamble, but an Italian Chianti is so much cheaper than a California Cabernet that it's worth the risk. Just buy three bottles from three different labels, and at least one of them is bound to be as good as a Cal-Cab that costs much more. Then buy twelve of whatever the good one was and put it in your cellar.

      The game, as far as I'm concerned, is to never spend more than ten bucks on an "everyday" table wine to go with a social dinner. It saves cash so I can buy a bottle or two of the really snobby stuff for more important occasions. Also, wine bargain-hunting is a lot of fun.

      Sure, sure... you can always get an okay-tasting blended wines for next to nothing... but isn't it fun to serve a vintage wine (which tastes pretty good) to your guests? They don't need to know that it didn't cost you any more per volume than the mass-produced box wines would have. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    23. Re:Perspective by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      >Though you left out the best use for the Hemi.
      Chrysler must be saving a mint. They only need one plant to manufacture the first 6 feet regardless of model. Then just bolt it on to the rest of the car.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    24. Re:Perspective by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      i think that the words "toyota", "honda", "mitsubishi", and "hitachi" must be missing from your vocab.

      How easy is it to get an 8-liter V8 in a Honda? Perhaps they should be missing?

    25. Re:Perspective by corbettw · · Score: 1

      For decent, yet cheap, table wines, I only have three words for: Two. Buck. Chuck.

      If you live in California, anyway. Since I moved to Texas, that's one of the things for which I pine. Getting to add Shiner to my diet helped some, though.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    26. Re:Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm. You don't mention Bulgary for it's wines, but you do mention Belgium for its wines? If you need to mention Belgium, please mention it for being the real origin of 'french' fries, for the best chocolate 'bonbons' in the world, a generally very high standard of 'cuisine', and last but not least, the best and the largest selection of beers in the world.

      And no, I'm not from Belgium. I just find that there are many food subjects that they're very good at, but I would not count wine as one of them.

    27. Re:Perspective by neko9 · · Score: 1

      I think I'm moving to Japan...

      me too.

    28. Re:Perspective by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you how sad that makes me....

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  35. Meowlingual - Language Translator by hobbespatch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife is Japanese so we get to go to Japan once a year or so. Last year we got a 'Meowlingual' which really is very accurate on translating a cat's needs/wants/and moods. My wife mentioned that Taraka is making a handheld Universal Translator - when you speak into it - it will translate what you said into different languages or will translate what someone says into your language. Anyone heard about that?

    --
    Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
    1. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      a 'Meowlingual' which really is very accurate on translating a cat's needs/wants/and moods

      Here's an actual transcript of a recent Meowlingual translation:


      C: "Meow!"
      M: "Feed Me!"
      Cat: "Meow!"
      Meowlingual: "I am the coolest thing on this planet".
      C: "Meow!"
      M: "Don't touch me! Leave me alone!"
      C: "Meow!"
      M: "I am way too important to be inside this house!"
      C: "Meow!"
      M: "I will do what I want, when I want, and YOU will learn to like it!"
    2. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by hobbespatch · · Score: 1

      Had this 'conversation' last week:

      C: "Meow!"
      M: "Pay attention to me!"
      C: "Meow!"
      M: "Pay attention to me!"
      C: "Meeeeeoooow!" M: "I really need a girlfriend!"

      --
      Still Mud? Try www.phoenixmud.org!
    3. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Funny
      My wife mentioned that Taraka is making a handheld Universal Translator - when you speak into it - it will translate what you said into different languages or will translate what someone says into your language. Anyone heard about that?

      Shaka, when the walls fell.

    4. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who needs a translator to tell what their cat wants shouldn't own a cat.

    5. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by rayzat · · Score: 1

      2 points for obscure Start Trek the Next Generation reference

    6. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 1

      Anyone heard about that?

      Yeah, but it was in the novel "Galapagos" by Kurt Vonnegut.

      And the guy that invented it was Japanese. Go figure.

    7. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by duckpoopy · · Score: 1

      Darmak and Gilard at Tanagra.

      --
      word.
    8. Re:Meowlingual - Language Translator by QTeela · · Score: 1

      The Meowlingual could be improved if it accounted for the context in which the meow was uttered. I say: Tweets! Or Snack! Cats say: Meow! (Which could mean 'Yippee', or 'It's About Time', or No, no, that's not what I wanted', as they edge towards the door, hoping to be let into the yard, which is safely enclosed by CatFencinhttp://www.www.catfencein.com/). With the new meowlingual you could wirelessly download the data, and then replay the conversation in slowmo with software similar to CoolEdit, and annotate with subtext, which would be used as additional input to the interpretation algorithm. Also, 'Tweets' (pronounced TWEEETS!!!!) would be a good name for a between-meals catfood. Cats like the EEE sound. It could become the new pop-culture slogan.

  36. Fantasy Island by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. Sony PSP (Playstation Portable)

    Wow! The power of a Plastation *1* with a tiny screen! Be still my heart! Sorry, but small and portable does not automatically equate to "cool" anymore. I feel the same lack of caring I felt when cell phones started having games I played on my Atari 800. TrueEnvy Factor: 0

    2. Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000:

    Another dumbass tiny computer running a dumber ass OS. Who cares? Why is this cool? TruEnvy Factor: One complimentary BSOD.

    3. DoCoMo "Mobile FeliCa" Payment System:

    Wow. More ways to spend money. I'm sure retailers like this. Is it that difficult to slide the credit card through the little slot, and then just pay the bills at the end of the month? Have some perspective, folks. People use to have to carry cows, sheep and dughters around with them in order to effect trade. And DoCoMo sounds like a Pokemon creature. TruEnvy Factor: -2

    4. The NEC V601N:

    TeeVee on my cell phone. Who cares? What sort of deprived life do you have to lead to give a fook about this stuff? TrueEnvy Factor: Undetectable by modern scientific instrumentality.

    5. SONY Clie VZ-90:

    I bought a PDA once. Within a month I was back to a small Meade paper and pen based scheduling system and never looked back. TruEnvy Factor: Planck's constant.

    6. Takara's Dream Factory

    New Age hits Japan. I fear for the anime industry. TrueEnvy Factor: Three tenths of a quartz crystal.

    7. Sony HMP-A1 Portable Media Player: Wish your iPod could play back movies?

    No. Not really.

    Sony hopes you do.

    Sony would like the PIN numbers to my accounts as well.

    Its new HMP-A1 PMP offers 20 gigabytes of MP3 and MPEG-4 playback goodness

    *snore*

    it even has a video-out jack so you can watch your flicks on a big-screen TV instead of its embedded sharp but tiny 3.5-inch screen.

    Thus illustrating its pointlessness. TrueEnvy Factor: One negasphere of nonexistence.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Fantasy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, the PSP is roughly the power of the PS2.

      Of course, it's not out in Japan yet. (Matter of days though)

    2. Re:Fantasy Island by griffitts · · Score: 0

      Ned Ludd, is that you?

    3. Re:Fantasy Island by CestusGW · · Score: 1

      2. Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000:

      Another dumbass tiny computer running a dumber ass OS. Who cares? Why is this cool? TruEnvy Factor: One complimentary BSOD.

      BSOD? The Zaurus series are running Linux, not Windows CE *hugs his SL-5500*

      --
      Too much repetition my too much repetition!
    4. Re:Fantasy Island by zx75 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Congratulations! You have successfully recorded an American attitude to *new and shiny things*, the primary reason WHY the Japanese have access to the latest and greatest while the US must wait.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    5. Re:Fantasy Island by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      It sure looks to me like you are jealous of the japanese...

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    6. Re:Fantasy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comment above perfectly illustrates the article's point. My 8-track player also works, so why do people want all these iThingies?

    7. Re:Fantasy Island by brkello · · Score: 1

      Small and portable isn't cool anymore? What are you talking about? Has everyone been ditching their cell phones and PDAs when I wasn't looking? Do kids refuse to pick up their gameboys because the screens are too small? It seems you like to belittle stuff other people find useful. Fine, this stuff isn't for you, but taht doesn't make it "stupid". Your criticism of a product is the name of the company? Your name is a rip off of a cartoon network show...should we judge your opinions based of of that?

      I don't mind that you don't find these things useful...it's just your piss poor attitude about it. You don't want something so you have to insult it...it's just childish. I don't understand a lot of the people on Slashdot these days...(well, mayby I do if you are still in high school). Putting down something or someone does not make you cool or superior...it just makes you look bitter and insecure.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    8. Re:Fantasy Island by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      8-track player? What's that? Aren't you satisfied with the Edison Phonograph?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:Fantasy Island by interiot · · Score: 1
      In my humble opinion, it's pretty easy to quickly dismiss new innovations. The benefits new innovations provide are sometimes more subtle, but sometimes subtle enhancements can provide bigger improvements to users than one would initially think.
      • Tivo -- digital VCR? Why? My analog one works fine.
      • P2P file sharing -- I already get free music from my radio, and it doesn't constantly threaten me with $100,000 lawsuits
      • VoIP -- voice calls with the mobility of landlines and the voice quality and reliability of cell phones, great.....
    10. Re:Fantasy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with him. Who really cares about all this gadgetry stuff. I think the reason you guys are bashing him is because he doesn't reflect the average slashdot member, who is all about consumption and having the latest and greatest, do everything gadget. I'm tired of having to shell out 5000 dollars a year to compete in this consumption dick bumping contest. The reason this stuff is so popular in Japan is because Japanese culture has forgotten that you don't have to have the latest most expensive hardware to be cool.

    11. Re:Fantasy Island by incom · · Score: 1

      It's called a troll, and it seems to have fooled many.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    12. Re:Fantasy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo! Comment of the day as far as I'm concerned!

    13. Re:Fantasy Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I agree with him

      I might have, had he not taken the same attitude of the majority of the compensate-for-a-small-penis assholes he seems to be critisizing. Normally, I'm one to ignore the medium and try to understand the message. I guess I'm becoming an old-fart [tm].

    14. Re:Fantasy Island by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      Small and portable isn't cool anymore?

      No. To be honest it really hasn't been since the Osborne 1.

      What are you talking about? Has everyone been ditching their cell phones and PDAs when I wasn't looking? Do kids refuse to pick up their gameboys because the screens are too small?

      I didn't say no one wants them. I said they aren't cool anymore. Cotton balls, milk and socks aren't cool either, but people buy them. Also, I was addressing these particular items, not gadgets in general.

      It seems you like to belittle stuff other people find useful.

      I didn't say they weren't useful. I said they weren't cool.

      Fine, this stuff isn't for you, but taht doesn't make it "stupid".

      They're not stupid. They're boring.

      Your criticism of a product is the name of the company? Your name is a rip off of a cartoon network show...

      That's what we in the higher primate evolutionary lines call "a joke".

      should we judge your opinions based of of that?

      I don't give a flying fook at a rolling donut what you do.

      I don't mind that you don't find these things useful...it's just your piss poor attitude about it.

      I didn't say they weren't useful. I said- oh, what's the point... The whole original article was about coolness and envy, not practicality. I was arguing against that, and tossing in some silliness to flag my whole post as jokey to anyone with even minimal perceptual skills.

      You don't want something so you have to insult it...it's just childish. I don't understand a lot of the people on Slashdot these days...(well, mayby I do if you are still in high school). Putting down something or someone does not make you cool or superior...it just makes you look bitter and insecure.

      Oh, cheer up. It's almost Christmas.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    15. Re:Fantasy Island by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You have successfully recorded an American attitude to *new and shiny things*

      What? We like things to have some level of actual use and practicality?

      Damn, I only *wish* people in this country thought like that. We'd never have a budget deficit ever again.

      the primary reason WHY the Japanese have access to the latest and greatest while the US must wait.

      And yet, somehow, life goes on.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    16. Re:Fantasy Island by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      Again, this is bad how?

      If you really want it, you can always order the japanese version anyway. I had a Sharp minidisc player ordered this way. All the packaging was in japanese, didn't make that big of a difference since these products should be intuitive to begin with.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    17. Re:Fantasy Island by BagMan2 · · Score: 1

      PSP is far closer to being PlayStation 2 powerful, not 1. Is it at least a little bit cooler now? I've played the PSP and it is nothing short of awesome.

    18. Re:Fantasy Island by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1
      What? We like things to have some level of actual use and practicality?

      No you don't. Americans like guns, don't they?
      --
      -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
    19. Re:Fantasy Island by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
      No you don't. Americans like guns, don't they?

      Ah, stereotypes. They just grind any conversation to a pathetic halt, don't they?

      And we call them "equlaizers" here. And, yes, they have immense practicality when used legally.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
    20. Re:Fantasy Island by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      Insightful my fucking ass.. makes me wonder what mods on /. are smoking these days.

      Repeat after me "I am not representative of the entire market, I am not representative of the entire market!"

      That you might not like something doesn't mean others will feel the same. Who the fuck do you think you are that people would have to give a fuck about what you think?

  37. dynamism by necrognome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Check out Dynamism for import gear with US warranties and support. Compact Impact has some cool gear to show off, and also has a showroom in the East Village (this store was previously named TKNY). If you are a New Yorker, the showroom is worth a visit, because the owner is a wacky guy who makes custom computers without moving parts.

    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    1. Re:dynamism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say no moving parts are you referring to the CD eject mechanism?

    2. Re:dynamism by necrognome · · Score: 1

      He uses flash memory as storage/media. No moving parts means no hard drive (i.e. the one with platters), no fans (cpu or psu), or cd/floppy drives. I guess the keyboard/mouse you attach to it would have moving parts (not necessarily), but his impetus was to create a true "noiseless" pc. Also, the ones he showed to me were in mini-attache cases, making them look like spy gear or something.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  38. Wooden Processor by malia8888 · · Score: 1
    From the article: the vast majority of American consumers prefers to window shop -- experiencing new technology by proxy rather than shelling out the cash necessary to really own it.

    --
    Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    1. Re:Wooden Processor by malia8888 · · Score: 1
      From the article the vast majority of American consumers prefers to window shop -- experiencing new technology by proxy rather than shelling out the cash necessary to really own it.

      Americans hang on to old, outdated computers so long (as witnessed in my partners computer repair company) it is almost embarrasing to argue with them that their old dog-of-a-machine should be retired. We run into a few people with the newest, hottest--most keep the old and busted. I mean really old and busted.

      --
      Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    2. Re:Wooden Processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EEEk I hit send, dang these long nails!

    3. Re:Wooden Processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can be a good thing. No reason to trash the old 486 if you can put OpenBSD on it and turn it into a router/firewall for your LAN. Those old machines use less power and create less heat & noise than most new stuff, except maybe the VIA EPIA boards and similar...
      And who needs P4 for a desktop machine? I'm using an older AMD Duron with lots of ram, and the performance is more than adequate. Granted I don't run Windows or use KDE/Gnome, nor am I a hardcore gamer. But hey I can run any web broser fine, view PDFs, play mp3/ogg and movies, write and compile code plenty fast, and even play Xmame roms. No reason to buy another computer unless this one breaks down. ;)

    4. Re:Wooden Processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See StrongBad for elucidation.

    5. Re:Wooden Processor by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Although conversly those same people would (for some rediculous reason) rather buy a shiny new dell or HP instead of taking the time to clean all the spyware and crapware off their old machine to make it run better.

  39. test dummies by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Market conditions in Japan and America are locked in a cause/effect loop. Underneath the Japanese teen rage for new devices, and the American sloth in buying a few innovations at WalMart, are the marketing machines behind the markets.

    "Japan's trade surplus with the United States remains astronomically high, at over $6 billion; yet [Japan] keeps its most innovative and exciting widgetry to itself, selling it only to the domestic market."

    Neither Japanese manufacturers nor American stores want to take big risks in marketing untested products to a fickle market, but they also depend on competing with their old devices based largely on "newness". So Japanese manufacturers test their devices in Japan, figuring out which are popular with whom, before they send any to the US to be sold for the big revenue.

    None of that is going to change any time soon. The only way for Americans to get stuff first, as a test market, is to make it first. Like we do with content: movies, music, fashion; American manufacturers test that stuff here (even when the factories are overseas), then market the winners over there. It's not so much where the factories are, as where are the innovators and marketers, and the test markets where they can afford to fail before going global.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  40. Re:Columns.. by akadruid · · Score: 1

    That article's layout is so horrible. The entire text is in One small column to the left. Lynx renders it so much better!

    Tip of the Day: Click 'Print version' or whatever it's called, and it will lay the article out in a normal fashion.

    Works on a great many sites which stupid layouts in fact. Having the text taking up a large %age of the screen allows you to resize it as you fit, one of the wonders provided by most windowing systems.

    (x) Check here to recieve a new tip with every post.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  41. Yeah but its not all so useful... by kabrakan · · Score: 1

    I have this book called '283 useful inventions from japan.' While a lot of them are great, and even simple designs that would make life much nicer in the states(like why don't we have pillows that allow proper airflow so they don't overheat?), a lot of them are absolutely useless and seem to have been designed just because they can be. I sure won't ever use the portable blatter sack. Just because they have the ability, doesn't mean they have the need.

    --
    Slartibartfast:"Is that your robot?"
    Marvin:"No, I'm mine."
  42. europe by drago · · Score: 2, Informative

    hey, be happy you don't live in Europe! We get the cool gadgets even later than the US and for twice the price anyways. And don't even _think_ about current movies!

    1. Re:europe by Spellbinder · · Score: 1

      that is not true!
      maybe you should notice that it is not an unified market in case of language
      the german speaking part is normally way before america in case of cell phones
      and i had the impression it is almoste the same with french and english speakers

      --


      stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
    2. Re:europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm... You obviously do have the internet. I seriously doubt that your connection has THAT much lag.

      Nudge, nudge, wink, wink, know what I mean?
      Say no more, say no more!

    3. Re:europe by salmacis2 · · Score: 1

      True. But at least we don't get the downside of actually having to live in America.

  43. Quite simple. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US doesn't recruit the mad geniuses the way Japan does. Japan has an aggressive program that attracts and subsidizes their research in many important fields, such as mecha research, mind control rays, cellular reanimation techniques, and psychic enhancement. As a result, we are trailing behind Japan in the tech race.

    Some have pointed out that we don't have giant robots battling in the strees, gangs of psychic mutant orphans roaming the streets, and little to no defense against nude female aliens with magical powers, but I for one don't really find that to be a realistic assesment of the situation. As anyone in Japan can tell you, those problems are more than adequately delt with by the superhero cyborg schoolgirls that roam the countryside.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  44. There are too many regulations & lawsuits in U by tc1970 · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest problems are the strict regulations in North America. It's good that they are protecting us comsumers. On the other hand, we don't get to buy the latest and greatest "toys" from Japan. For example, the new Toyota MR2 is not available in Canada because of our higher crash-test standard (the front bumper fails). Also, rediculous lawsuits here do scare a lot of companies. It's true that Japaneses are beta-testing for us but products over here are "less-exciting" (things are overly-regulated). Just my 2 cents.

  45. we're not all such big boobies! by Petrox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    money quote:

    ""The way business works here is simple," says David J. Farber. "In America, if you have a potential product, you do research, you try to figure out the size of the potential market. And if it's a totally new, totally innovative thing, where no one has any idea of the size of the market, and there's no guaranteed return on a large investment, well, forget it. No American company will touch it. In Japan, it's usually quite the opposite: manufacturers know that the home market loves new stuff; they'll take risks there, hoping that something will catch fire and take off. The only U.S. company that's doing that is Apple, and, honestly, I don't think that even Steve Jobs, in all of his infinite wisdom, thought that the iPod was going to take off the way it has.""

    how about that? who knew that I, with my ibook/ipod toting ways, was such a technological zeitgeist?

    --
    sig my booty, check my website
    1. Re:we're not all such big boobies! by Zangief · · Score: 1

      You posted that, with the sole purpose of referencing Hegel...

  46. Three years ago... by Chagatai · · Score: 4, Informative
    My wife and I went to Japan for our honeymoon. Naturally, we went to Akihabara twice during our visit. I was so amazed at the gear that they had there three years ago that is still barely showing up here. They already had full-blown DVD camcorders for fairly reasonable prices. We tried on a pair of goggles that gave the person wearing them a virtual cinema, projecting what appeared to be a 80" screen for TV, movies, and computer systems (!) in front of the user, complete with stereo sound. The cost? About $400. Hell, they even had cellphones playing some sort of Dreamcast game (I believe it was Space Channel 5). We both left the "Electric Town" wondering why we hadn't seen any of this in the US; now this article makes a little more sense of it.

    Then again, everything is cooler... in Japan!!!

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Three years ago... by Kphrak · · Score: 1

      We tried on a pair of goggles that gave the person wearing them a virtual cinema, projecting what appeared to be a 80" screen for TV, movies, and computer systems (!) in front of the user, complete with stereo sound. The cost? About $400.

      They sell these in the US on eBay. And in my personal experience, they are truly horrible.

      I bought a pair for about $400. They're basically two small LCD TVs with a headband around them. You can watch a movie with a halfway-decent picture on them, but keep in mind that they're TV resolution and using them for anything with text (games, etc) is pretty much impossible. I realized that I had wasted $400, but as long as I marketed them on eBay as "VR Goggles L@@k!@!1!" I knew I could get some sucker to buy them for the same price I had bought them for. Which one did. I wonder just how many hands those goggles went through before they reached me; how many people tried them, realized how impractical they were, and put 'em back up on eBay?

      I know the goggles were probably cool in Akihabara, but I assure you that once you've got them into the States, their coolness factor immediately plummets. They're neat gadgets, but any extended use will reveal their miserable shortcomings.

      Really, this just underscores the article. The Japanese love the whiz-bang factor of a new gadget. Americans are more conservative in their gadget-buying, and much more likely to take the extended-use factor into account.

      This extends across Asian cultures; the Chinese are (again from personal experience) also much more likely to buy a gadget based on its coolness, without caring much about how useful it will be in the long term.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    2. Re:Three years ago... by rk · · Score: 1
      projecting what appeared to be a 80" screen for TV, movies, and computer systems (!)

      Yeah, the only problem was the 80" screen looked to be about half a mile away.

    3. Re:Three years ago... by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Then again, everything is cooler... in Japan!!!

      Look, we just got an 'In Korea, only old people...' meme, the last thing we need is another one. Let's put this one on the back burner for at least a few months, shall we?

    4. Re:Three years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have slept through several years here, old timer. The "... in Japan!" bit has been around for a LONG time. Almost as long as the "Soviet Russia" jokes. The "In Korea, only old people..." bit is only a couple of WEEKS old in comparison.

  47. Great source for Japanese gadgets by Shinzaburo · · Score: 1

    Given the topic, I couldn't resist the opportunity to offer up the most shameless of plugs. Shinza.com is devoted to bringing the best Japanese gadgets to your doorstep. Be sure to check the popular line of ZeroShock notebook sleeves. The catalog is a little sparse at the moment, but the coming weeks will bring a lot of changes. Bookmark the site and drop by from time to time!

  48. the world trade situation by hyperquantization · · Score: 1

    the Japanese usually tend to be very liberally tech-savvy. it makes sense when you look at the fact that they really dont have much space to farm with. they have to depend upon engineering/manufacturing in order to compete in the world market.
    and, as another slashdotter mentioned, we've got our space, theyve got their gadgets.

  49. Akihabara by BlueThunderArmy · · Score: 1
    Every slashdotter should go to Akihabara at least once in his life. It's a beautiful, beautiful place filled with tiny cell phones, strange and new configurations of everyday appliances, and Japanese nerds who manage to pull it off with style.

    And as much as people are making fun of some of this tech, don't tell me there wouldn't be a demand in the US for a pressure-activated heated toilet seat, which Japan had more than five years ago.

  50. Supporting irradiated beef ??? by MyTwoCentsWorth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, hearing the word irradiated beef makes one shudder... since people refuse to understand that irradiating food is one of the safest way of preserving it for long terms without the need for refrigeration, artificial preservatives, etc.
    As soon as someone can how me ONE study showing ANY danger from irradiated food, and we can start comparing it against the well know risks of all the other preservation methods.
    It's a pity that most people do not try to think about this, but reject it automatically.
    Have fun posting.

    1. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Of course there's always the beef industry/grocery store conspiracy theory that they like the fact that non-irradiated meat goes bad so quickly since it makes people go to the store more often or buy more meat when old meat goes bad, so they don't push for adoption...

      I suppose it's too much to hope that someday I'll be able to buy a steak and have it still be good three or four days later if my plans change suddenly without the use of chemical preservatives or the freezer.

    2. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      from http://hps.org/publicinformation/ate/q4076.html:


      If the food still has living cells, (such as seeds, or shellfish, or potatoes) they will be damaged or killed just as microbes are. This can be a useful effect. For example, it can be used to prolong the shelf life of potatoes by keeping them from sprouting. The energy can induce a few other changes. At levels approved for use on foods, levels of the vitamin thiamine are slightly reduced. This reduction is not enough to result in vitamin deficiency."


      Our digestive system is full of both beneficial and harmul microbes. Presumably we obtain beneficial microbes from what we eat. We probably also acquire resistance to harmful microbes by eating them in small quantities on a continual basis. So personally, I would prefer staying on a diet of food that exposes me to what my body has evolved to handle well, and won't expose me to vulnerability if my supply of irradiated food suddenly stops.

    3. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by CptNerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll have to remember that next time I order a Salmonella omelet with a side of Botulism soup.

      With extra E.Coli for flavor...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    4. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I would prefer staying on a diet of food that exposes me to what my body has evolved to handle well, and won't expose me to vulnerability if my supply of irradiated food suddenly stops.

      We don't need to irradiate *everything*. Just things that spoil quickly (personally I'd be happy if they only did it to beef and pork), and even then you should have a choice between the irradiated and non-irradiated option. If you cook the hell out of your meat to avoid salmonilla anyway, you're killing off any microbes that are living in/on there anyway.

    5. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Speare · · Score: 1

      Honey, don't buy me none of them irradiated foods!

      But darling, what do you think the microwave oven does?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    6. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      As I understand it the issue is not with irradiated food per se. The problem is that many food safety tests are tests for live organisms. Irradiating beef, say, can kill the bacteria, leaving toxins produced by the bacteria untouched and harder to detect. But that was a few years ago and by now I'd expect there to be good tests for the toxins too.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    7. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Test, then irradiate. Fail the test, chuck the food. Expensive when the tests fail, but that's always true, and most of the time, the tests won't fail.

      But that, of course, doesn't solve the real problem that feeding little Johnny radiated^H^H^H^Hoactive food will of course cause him to grow fifty feet tall and terrorize the neighborhood until the National Guard comes out and guns him down.

      God, I wish the culture could just grow up about radiation issues. Maybe after the baby boomers who grew up on shitty B-movies die off we can have a reasonable national debate about it....

    8. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 2, Funny

      As soon as someone can how me ONE study showing ANY danger from irradiated food, and we can start comparing it against the well know risks of all the other preservation methods.

      Apparently, you've never seen cautionary tales as "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes". Of course, after seeing "The Toxic Avenger" I'd take irradiation over chemical preservatives any day...)

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    9. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and yet the same people opposed to irradiated beef have microwaves at home.

    10. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Dahan · · Score: 1
      But darling, what do you think the microwave oven does?

      Well, sweetie, the microwave uses a device called a magnetron to generate microwaves--radio waves with a frequency of about 2.45GHz. These "microwaves" are absorbed by various molecules in the food, causing them to vibrate faster and heat up. Microwaves are non-ionizing radiation; they don't have enough energy to knock electrons out of orbit.

      On the other hand, irradiation to kill pathogens in food is generally done with gamma radiation from a radioactive source, such as Cobalt 60. While gamma rays are also radio waves, they are of much higher frequency than microwaves: over 30 exahertz or so--that's 30,000,000,000GHz. As such, they have enough energy to knock electrons loose from orbit, and are known as ionizing radiation. Food irradiation is also done with X-rays, which are still ionizing radiation, but less energetic than gamma rays.

      Now come eat your dinner, it's getting cold!

    11. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Arkaein · · Score: 1

      Regardless of irrational fears about irradiation of food, there is a good argument against irradiation IMHO. And that is that if foor producers are allowed to use radiation to kill any harmful bacteria in meat, they will take even less care than they already do in making sure that the meat is processed safely and cleanly.

      In other words, irradiated beef may be safe, but it also will have more shit (and I do mean this literally) in it than beef made safe without the use of radiation.

    12. Re:Supporting irradiated beef ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only speak for american culture, but we used to have a radiation fetish. (this was before we knew better)

      You could go to the shoe store and Xray your feet to see how well your shoes fit.

      Xrays were used to cure things like acne.

  51. Ask the army who has the coolest gadgets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan weren't allowed to develop certain weapons after the second world war, they had to develop other technological industrys.

    The US however spends its money elsewhere.

  52. Discretionary by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    The other aspect this is that more Japanese will pay for the technology. There are endless debates on /. about the cost differential between the lowest priced commodity hardware and Apple for example. How about Qualia? You need to bleed money for that stuff.

    The other aspect is acceptance of the non-established. The United States is pretty damn conservative in accepting new technologies and coming to terms with them. People worry about the next Betamax vs. VHS war when the Japanese will just buy more equipment or another phone.

    I'm not sure that I'd trade living with mom and dad for cool gadgets, but our tech atmosphere is a little constricting. The late nineties were nice for the very reason that money was being thrown at every possible technology. "No one ever got fired for buying IBM." There is some insight in that statement.

    1. Re:Discretionary by WaterBreath · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's important to note that a big part of this conservatism is in the corporate aspect of society. The U.S. has many well-established industries that are integral to our economy. And they, instead of embracing new technology and making the most out of them, don't want to bet the company on changing their business model which has worked for decades. And since they're integral to the economy, the government is scared to force them to evolve with the times, for fear they will fail and hurt the country as a whole. Japan, whose entire government and economy had to be "rebooted" earlier in this century, has a huge advantage over us in that respect. They know an awful lot about moving consistently forward.

      For examples, just look to the telecom and automotive industries. Why are American cars still dependent on oil? Why, for crap's sake, is it not okay for the government to provide free wirless broadband access in Philadelphia? Because the corporations are afraid to give way to advancement and try something new. I'm pretty sure there are not many people in Philly who would not like to have free wireless internet, but they don't get a say because some corporation doesn't like it.

      If you ask me, businesses will be the only first-class citizens in this nation very soon. Just look how much sway they hold just by saying to the government "you can't do that, it will hurt our profit margins." For crap's sake, sink or swim. Evolve, or become extinct. Japan is evolving. We are not.

    2. Re:Discretionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The late nineties were nice for the very reason that money was being thrown at every possible technology."

      Unless you were one of those suckers whose money was being thrown away in every possible way.

    3. Re:Discretionary by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Japan, whose entire government and economy had to be "rebooted" earlier in this century, has a huge advantage over us in that respect. They know an awful lot about moving consistently forward.

      Have you looked at the Japanese economy over the past 5 years? Saying it's in the toilet would be an understatement. It's showing signs of recovering, but our little mini-recession looked like a major bubble compared to Japan's economy.

      Why are American cars still dependent on oil?

      Because like it or not, it's still the most efficient/economic method of powering vehicles in a country where average travel distances are large. I-C engines also have extreme longevity when compared to many other methods. I've owned three vehicles that passed 75K miles, and one with over 100K miles, all maintained in good condition and running strong. Electrics just aren't economical to maintain for that kind of usage. On the plus side for the future, we finally are seeing some technologies with the possibility of changing this, and one interim method, biodiesel.

      Why, for crap's sake, is it not okay for the government to provide free wirless broadband access in Philadelphia?

      Because that's not their job. Their job is to provide essential emergency services, maintain the transportation infrastructure and provide defense. They should no more be building wireless ISPs than they should be building multi-billion dollar playgrounds for spoiled millionares (stadiums). Besides, inspite of how cool it sounds, have you ever seen the government do any long-term project right? Most Pennsylvania governments have a hard time keeping the potholes down to non-fatal sizes, and you want them to run your ISP? I grew up near Philly, I wouldn't trust them with tin cans and string.

      I'm pretty sure there are not many people in Philly who would not like to have free wireless internet,

      It's not "free", the government raises taxes to pay for it, which means a lot of folks who don't want or need it still have to pay for it, and that's not fair.

    4. Re:Discretionary by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      Because like it or not, it's still the most efficient/economic method of powering vehicles in a country where average travel distances are large.

      It's only the most efficient because the automotive companies only started trying to research alternatives within the past few years. I was more referring to the total lack of impetus to move technology forward to even see if we can make things better. The reason we don't have it is because there was no funding for research. Because the companies were making money just fine the way they were, until oil prices started to skyrocket again a few yeas back and "alternative energy" finally hit the mainstream media, and people started to become aware of how much money they are throwing away. It's not a whole lot different from the problem we have here of corporations doing absolutely everything they can to keep from having to spend money on pollution prevention/cleanup. Yes, it's better than many other places, but we have the technology to fix it, they just don't want to spend the money. The point was, it was only until a few years ago, when the contrary became obvious, that the automotive companies were saying straight to the media that there was no viable alternative to oil and that they firmly believed that the alternatives other people were researching would fall flat. They had no desire to make an improvement that didn't directly affect their bottom line. Only now people are looking for better mileage and more eco-friendly cars, and it is starting to hit their bottom line. Which is why the American auto companies are finally putting money into researching hybrids.

      Because that's not their job

      Why isn't it their job? What is the government's job? We (well, some of us) also say the government's job is not to make sure that everyone has good health care that doesn't have prohibitive costs. In Europe they decided exactly the opposite. And look at how much better their health care system is than ours. Yeah, they pay higher taxes. But guess what? When you need that emergency bypass operation, you don't get a multi-thousand-dollar bill when it's done that you can't afford. But, oh we couldn't do that here. Because the insurance companies would be up in arms, threatening to stop campaign donations if a politician supported something like that. Let me tell you, I'd rather pay a tax that I knew was going to help someone get health care than to syphon money into an insurance company who won't even completely cover the healthcare costs that I have.

      Granted internet access isn't the same as health care. But there have been studies done recently showing that more and more business that used to be available offline is going online, and it's even been shown that many services that used to be solely offline are now solely online. In America, it's the way business is going, and people without internet access are going to be at more and more of a disadvantage as time goes on. It seems to me it will soon be a reasonable service to provide. Or at least a regulatable service like water and power.

      building multi-billion dollar playgrounds for spoiled millionares

      I'm not even going to get into the economic benefits to the city/state of having professional sports. It makes everyone's lives better because it's more money flowing through the area.

      It's not "free", the government raises taxes to pay for it.

      Well, if the people don't want to pay for it, then they should be the ones objecting. My argument still stands that the complaints of a corporation losing some profit shouldn't cause the blockage of a law that benefits the citizens if the citizens support it.

    5. Re:Discretionary by glockenspieler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ok, i can't suppress the urge to reply to this.

      "Why, for crap's sake, is it not okay for the government to provide free wirless broadband access in Philadelphia?"

      Because that's not their job. Their job is to provide essential emergency services, maintain the transportation infrastructure and provide defense. They should no more be building wireless


      The definition of "emergency services" and "infrastructure" should be allowed to evolve. We may very well be at the beginning of a process where continual connectivity is indeed a part of critical infrastructure that is the legitimate role of government. To legislate this out of existence seems a bit presumptive and smacks of protecting corporate interests.

      of how cool it sounds, have you ever seen the government do any long-term project right? Most Pennsylvania governments have a hard time keeping the potholes down to non-fatal sizes, and you want them to run your ISP? I grew up near Philly, I wouldn't trust them with tin cans and string.

      Many cities have functioning water supplies, sewer systems, electicity grids. No all function optimally but we get the water, we don't get sick from it, and our poo goes by by. Yes, government can function and this government hating mantra so common these days is vastly overdone.

      "Im pretty sure there are not many people in Philly who would not like to have free wireless internet"

      It's not "free", the government raises taxes to pay for it, which means a lot of folks who don't want or need it still have to pay for it, and that's not fair.


      Excellent point. There are parts of the city that I never go in, why the hell am i paying for street lights there. I never use the damned things. Its unfair people, blatantly unfair!. Do you ever stop to consider, just once, the possibility that you may derive indirect benefits from things and that government isn't about benefiting just YOU, its about the community. I think that a reasonable argument could be made that there might be benefits to the community. At least its not obvious that this is completely inappropriate for government.

    6. Re:Discretionary by Golias · · Score: 1

      Why are American cars still dependent on oil?

      Because it's still the cheapest way to move a car. Even driving a big 20 MPG gas-guzzling SUV, and even with gas going up to two bucks a gallon, that's still only ten cents per mile spent of fuel.

      The typical gasoline car, driven about 20,000 miles per year, ends up costing a total of about $0.23 per mile to drive, including the cost of the vehicle and all maintenance.

      Hybrid and electric cars seem like they are nearly as cheap to buy, but that's only because the R&D, the manufacturing, and the sales of these new cars are heavilly subsidized by the government. If you had to pay all the real costs of a Toyota Prius out of your own pocket, you would end up spending a hell of a lot more money over the life of the car that you would if you had bought a Toyota Camry.

      Why, for crap's sake, is it not okay for the government to provide free wirless broadband access in Philadelphia? ... I'm pretty sure there are not many people in Philly who would not like to have free wireless internet...

      Government Provided != Free

      Why should Hamish furniture salesmen share the cost of your broadband Internet use? If you want to NAT out broadband in your neighborhood, form a co-op with your neighbors and buy it! Stop begging your city and state governments for hand-outs.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Discretionary by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      Because it's still the cheapest way to move a car

      That was exactly my point. At the risk of sounding anti-capitalistic: everyone is so freaking concerned about money in this country! I've got nothing against capitalism in general. But there has evolved an idea in this country that the ability to pay for things is a basic right. You have the right to be able to pay for your necessities (food, shelter, etc.), not a direct right to necessities. I don't agree with that. I do believe there are certain things that are more important than protecting some CEO's right to amass a fortune. If the cars that CEO is responsible for producing are destroying the ozone layer, then he should be required to invest some of the massive profit he has made at the expense of the planet, back into its restoration: by researching and implementing alternative energy solutions.

      Why should Hamish furniture salesmen share the cost of your broadband Internet use?

      The same reason that I pay for the street lights and the roadwork, and the fire hydrants on Hamish's street, and he for mine. We very well may be moving into an era where connectivity becomes as needful as the transportation system, electric grid, and running water.

      In short, in both respects, I'm talking about the greater good. There are things that are more important than the preservation of wealth. If you don't want to make sacrifices from what you've already earned, then fine. But just because you made a profit in the past, that doesn't mean you have a right to continue making a profit.

    8. Re:Discretionary by Golias · · Score: 1

      At the risk of sounding anti-capitalistic: everyone is so freaking concerned about money in this country!

      Of course it is. Economy is life. If you increase the cost of a person getting to work, the fat-cats of society will still have their caviar, but poor folk see their lives become harder. There is little you can do which is more compassionate to your fellow man than keeping the basic cost of living as low as possible.

      I would put it to you that gas is not only cheaper, it's also cleaner than many of the alternatives. Electric cars are charged from the grid, which comes mostly from burning crude-oil and coal, except in places like the west coast, where they already ruined their environments with huge hydro-electric dams. (... and hybrid cars are unltimately just slightly more-efficient gas cars. Take out the gas engine, and they don't move.) Don't even get me started on battery disposal.

      In short, in both respects, I'm talking about the greater good.

      Heaven save us from people who want to talk about the Greater Good. Especially those who don't always stop and look at the unintended consequences and costs which are tied to the reforms they demand.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Discretionary by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      Why, for crap's sake, is it not okay for the government to provide free wirless broadband access in Philadelphia?

      Because they weren't going to provide it for free. They were going to charge people for it.

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    10. Re:Discretionary by WaterBreath · · Score: 1
      Economy is life.

      I'd propose that food, clothing, and shelter are life. Economy is easier life.

      I would put it to you that gas is not only cheaper, it's also cleaner than many of the alternatives.

      The main alternative is electricity. Electricity can be generated in a myriad of different ways. Oil, however, is generated in one way: pulling it out of the ground and refining it. We will someday run out of oil, and prices will continue to climb as we approach that point, eventually surpassing the price of alternatives. (Some estimates put that point at 100 years in the Middle East, assuming production doesn't continue to accelerate as it has in the past.) We're not just someday going to "run out" of electricity, because if necessary we can spread its generation across hundreds of methods and locations, minimizing extensive damage arising from any one method. And as far as battery disposal, I don't see how it could be much more difficult to implement a battery disposal/recycling program like the current tire disposal/recycling they have in many places.

      Heaven save us from people who want to talk about the Greater Good. Especially those who don't always stop and look at the unintended consequences and costs which are tied to the reforms they demand.

      If no one ever talks about making things better, then nothing will ever get done. The danger of "unintended consequences" has been used to discourage the optimistic for ages. Yes, they should be investigated. Anyone who made sweeping changes without investigating those things would be an idiot (please supress obvious comments about certain world leaders). If we change, bad things might happen. If we don't, bad things will happen. I'd prefer to take my chances with change if it might also improve things.

    11. Re:Discretionary by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      In Europe they decided exactly the opposite. And look at how much better their health care system is than ours.

      No, it's not, and yes, I have first-hand knowledge of it. Regardless of the problems our health care system has, you are far more likely to survive a hospital stay in the US than you are in any other country. My wife, a registered nurse for 19 years, was hospitalized in London, in a well-respected facility. In spite of that, she almost died from internal bleeding, because nobody present at the time was quilified to *start an IV*. Seems only doctors can do that there, and at night, it can take quite a while until you see one (4 hours).

      Yeah, you don't have to pay a bill for it, but frankly, that's *exactly* what it's worth.

      Canadians with money come to the US for health care all the time, and pay for it in cash. (Again, first-hand experience.) If their "free" health care is so good, why would they do that?

      I'm not even going to get into the economic benefits to the city/state of having professional sports. It makes everyone's lives better because it's more money flowing through the area.

      Doesn't exist. When you finally get an *unbiased* evaluation, you find that it's break-even at best. Convention centers, etc are a far better investment.

    12. Re:Discretionary by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Do you ever stop to consider, just once, the possibility that you may derive indirect benefits from things and that government isn't about benefiting just YOU, its about the community.

      By that reasoning, it is better to let the state kill you, and harvest your organs to be transplanted into recipients who desperately need them -- you can save more lives dead than you can support (your own) alive.

      That reasoning resulted in my father being taxed for national health care in Canada, but when he needed lifesaving surgery, he was denied it, even though it would have cost far less than he had contributed over the years. Communist Canadian bastards murdered him.

      Granted, the U.S. is not Canada (thank deity_of_choice), but whether the former U.S.S.R., Canada, or the U.S., large-scale government involvement in just about anything yields the worst possible management. Small scale local governments are more adaptable to their community's unique needs, more answerable to their residents, and more easily overthrown when things go bad.

      People should not have to involuntarily subsidize services they do not use, unless a clear and direct benefit to them can be demonstrated. Even then, I'd be wary about forcing direct support. An example might be street lights in less desirable neighborhoods permitting crime to be better controlled by making not providing a safe haven where petty thieves can hide under cover of darkness -- this can reduce insurance and policing costs for everyone.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    13. Re:Discretionary by JInterest · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. There are parts of the city that I never go in, why the hell am i paying for street lights there. I never use the damned things. Its unfair people, blatantly unfair!. Do you ever stop to consider, just once, the possibility that you may derive indirect benefits from things and that government isn't about benefiting just YOU, its about the community. I think that a reasonable argument could be made that there might be benefits to the community. At least its not obvious that this is completely inappropriate for government.

      Your point is even stronger if you use public schools as an example. It is something that the private sector can provide, that not everyone needs (not everyone has kids at a given point in time), yet we support it with our tax dollars because the benefits of providing the educational infrastructure leave most voters persuaded that it is a "good thing". Lack of infrastructure is killing the U.S.

      You know, the funny thing is, privatization used to be about private business doing things more efficiently. In Pennsylvania, it is apparently about protecting the profits of bloated telcos that AREN'T getting the job done. Vote'em out folks.

    14. Re:Discretionary by indigeek · · Score: 1

      Because like it or not, it's still the most efficient/economic method of powering vehicles in a country where average travel distances are large. I-C engines also have extreme longevity when compared to many other methods. I've owned three vehicles that passed 75K miles, and one with over 100K miles, all maintained in good condition and running strong. Electrics just aren't economical to maintain for that kind of usage.
      try explaining that electric engines don't last long to a train engine driver. Smaller electrical engines last long enough in home uses (water pumps last for years- only problem is the coil burning out in case of high voltages) , so I can't see why it will not last long enough in cars.
      Also if longevity was an issue, Diesel should have been much more popular than gasoline in US

    15. Re:Discretionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should be more worried about ensuring proper health coverage for your population rather than worrying about internet access. Get your priorities straight America.

    16. Re:Discretionary by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      The definition of "emergency services" and "infrastructure" should be allowed to evolve.

      OK, so let's talk about technological evolution.

      Government and centralized services are hardly the ultimate, best-case solution. They are more of a temporary kludge until technology advances enough to render them obsolete. In the future, things like water, sewer, and electricity will be completely de-centralized and privatized. Not because centralization doesn't work, but because decentralization is the logical perfect solution.

      In the future, there will be no power cords. You won't have to find a socket and plug your lamp in to have light -- the lamp will come with some form of high-efficiency battery or other self-sufficient energy source that lasts for 50 years before it needs to be replaced. Same goes for your computer, your dishwasher, your fridge, your stereo, and anything else that requires electricity. In the future, the eggs will no longer be in one basket. Power outages will be a thing of the past. In 100 years, people will look back on centralized power as fully obsolete technology -- no practical reason to use it anymore, because the better decentralized technology will be orders of magnitude cheaper to implement.

      Same goes for water and sewer. Each household will have a compact, super-efficient and eco-friendly sewage treatment "plant". Your sewage goes in, and comes out as a fully-treated, eco-safe, de-hydrated block of compact crap that can be disposed of safely. I imagine in the distant future we will even have "instant water". Each individual tap, toilet, and shower will produce its own water, eliminating the need for pipes.

      Now, some of this may or may not happen during our lifetimes, but it is guaranteed that it will eventually happen, whether or not we can imagine it today. Why? Because decentralization is the logical best-case scenario. Centralized services cannot possibly be as efficient or reliable as a mature decentralized technology.

  53. Sort of OT: oxtail soup by Yosemite+Sue · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you can buy/serve oxtail soup in the US, but you can in Canada. A friend of mine who has lived in the UK was thrilled to see this dish at a mall restaurant, as it is apparently illegal in the UK (mad cow concerns)!

    So ... we do get that (dubious) privilege that some of our European neighbours lack, food-wise ... :-7

    YS.

    --
    "Arrr! The laws of science be a harsh mistress." -- Bender
    1. Re:Sort of OT: oxtail soup by hey! · · Score: 1

      You can have it here in the US, it's just not popular. If you want to make it yourself, your local butcher shop can supply it.

      If you are concerned, I think you probably could just core out the bit with the spinal cord.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Sort of OT: oxtail soup by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in Canada you can't get a steak rare. It's medium-well, or well, or burnt... but not rare.

    3. Re:Sort of OT: oxtail soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell cow-brain tacos near my apartment.

    4. Re:Sort of OT: oxtail soup by Gio+Angles · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can find it in the U.S.

      It's a fairly common Cuban dish that you can find in many South Florida restaurants. It's known as "rabo encendido" down here.

  54. There's cool US stuff too. by Animats · · Score: 1

    (Yes, the Segway is still being sold.)

  55. it's the countries sizes stupid by rtphokie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Much of the tech wizardry mentioned in the article centers around telecommunications infrastructure. Rolling out a new generation of telecom in Japan is a lot different than rolling it out in the US. There are many more companies in the US which own the existing infrastructure and a much much larger land area to cover especially with wireless services.

    No reason to bring the neat toys to the US if there isn't an infrastructure to make them work. Even Europe has a much easier time rolling out very new technologies because of it's smaller size.

    1. Re:it's the countries sizes stupid by __aamcgs2220 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you on this one... To roll out 3G in Japan, it cost only a measly $6.14, but in the U.S., it cost over $1.21 gigabucks just because of the size of the countries. They only had to put up 2 towers, where we would have to put up over 37 octillion of them just to cover Rhode Island. (which is really a pretty good deal because that means each tower cost only $0.00000000000000000000000327 [They must be getting those towers from Sam's in RI or something, huh?])

    2. Re:it's the countries sizes stupid by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. Just like flat panels first took off in wall street brokerage firms. People in New York are willing to spend more on things that are small becuase everyone has a 500ft2 apartment. In japan they have 400ft2 so they'll spend even more on small crap.

      For the rest of our fat-ass country we don't care about small tech toys. We already have 4000 ft2 houses to store all of our ass-fat. Besides, we're busy spending all our money on fatass cars to drag our ass-fat to the aktins approved fatorium to optimize our fatilization.

      The US is about big, not about sophisticated. We have the biggest cars on the longest highways, with the biggest heated seats. 20ounce steaks, 2 for $8 if you catch the earlybird with a side of coleslaw and a porkchop.

  56. Wakarimasu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there, done that. I still marvel at the population density.

    My favorite Japanese technology is the toilet seat. I really got used to the heated seats and cleansing water with adjustable temperature. Not real fond of the $1000 price tag for a toilet seat, though.

    I really hated the lack of insulation in townhomes. Hmmm, if the choice is between the latest cell phone or warm home, I'll take the warm home.

  57. You know what I'd really like?? by bbroerman · · Score: 1

    I'd really like a PDA/eBook/media player that is equivalent to my HP 4500 (bluetooth, WiFi, SDIO) but with a 4x5 inch screen at 800x600... that way I can somewhat comfortably read an eBook or a web page. The tiny screen on my PDA is useless for this, and tablets are too big and too expensive... Hell, it if only had Acrobat, Media Player, and Internet Explorer, I'd be happy...

    --
    Logic is the beginning of reason, not the end of it.
    1. Re:You know what I'd really like?? by RedHatRebel0 · · Score: 1

      Try an OQO (www.oqo.com)

    2. Re:You know what I'd really like?? by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Media player? Internet Explorer?! I cast thee out! turn in your geek card on the way out seriously, how about something that ran firefox with the pdf plugin and a nice little mPlayer or Xine? That would do it for me

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    3. Re:You know what I'd really like?? by bbroerman · · Score: 1

      Hey, that would be great too... Windows, Linux, Unix, Palm, GNU, BeOs, TOS, Os-X, Gem, whatever... as long as I can browse the web, listen to music, movies, etc., and read an eBook or two, it doesn't really matter what OS it runs anymore....

      --
      Logic is the beginning of reason, not the end of it.
  58. Let's Compare by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

    Japan: Ghost in the Shell 2

    America: Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow

    Japan: "Robots. Cyborgs."

    America: "Stem cells are ew! God hates technology! Stop talking on your cell phone! Step away- from the computer!"

    It's the imagination. The American imagination is totally unprepared for the new world. We are still busy playing "cowboys and indians."

    I may be wrong, but my understanding is that Cybernetics is just a matter of course in Japan. I doubt they'd call it that, but the fundamental assumptions and understandings, I think are commonplace there. Pretty much everyone's psyched up about technology. Some people like it, some people don't, but nobody denies that it's going to happen.

    Here in the states, you talk about this stuff, and they look at you like you've just grown a third arm. "Nah, that'll never happen..." "...well, maybe, in a hundred years, but-..."

    I'm amazed at how little Americans know about the state of technology. And of what Americans do know, how little it's penetrated their consciousness.

    Americans don't want this stuff in their mind. They don't want to think about it. It's not even that- it's just not even in the imagination.

    (That's changing; witness The Matrix, and stuff like that. But contemporary-wise: We're way backwards.)

    1. Re:Let's Compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that virtually every significant tech advance in recent history was made in the U.S. You know, like the cell phone, the transistor, the modern digital computer? You do realize that we have the largest active space program and we send spacecraft into space right? The Japanese just made it smaller and cheaper.

      Oh, you are saying we don't make anime where the woman turns into a cybernetic mollusk that shoot death rays out of her nose? You are right, we lack imagination.

    2. Re:Let's Compare by LionKimbro · · Score: 1

      Heh heh. Yeah, and you're "fundamentally more creative" than the Japanese too. It's okay; You're "special." I know. We all know that. Americans are "special."

      But really, seriously, all joking aside:

      You're just furthering my point.

      The American tech imagination is all wrapped up in "outer space." We're still watching Star Trek reruns.

      Very unimportant.

      What's important is computers and robots and cyborgs.

      Is the American imagination ready for it? Are we prepared- mentally?

      Space can help us build space lasers and missiles and and what not. We can try to control things by threatening to lob rocks. Space-faring is cowboy mentality. That's our romance.

      But I think it's economy, computers, and automation that's actually going to be critical in this next half-century. (Wouldn't dare speculate into the second half.)

      The United States had the 20th century. We've had our glory days. We won WW2! Man on the moon! Yaaay! Wasn't that sad when the Challenger exploded? Oh wow! Computers! Dot-coms! X-prize!

      But where are the robots, in our mind? Where are the cyborgs? Why aren't we talking about computers as anything other than word processors and MP3 players? Why are we resisting broadband? Why do we get so nervous talking about these things?

      Asia clearly owns the 21st century. They own it, because they faced up to it, and integrated it, way before anyone else.

      Consider: Shinto + Technology. Two tastes that taste great together.

      Consider: Christianity + Technology. Hello? Hello, anybody?

      "Bueller? Bueller?"

      There is zero integration between Christianity and Technology. The Christians are scared to death of it. It just doesn't register in their worldview.

      But the Japanese have totally integrated Shinto and technology. They are well prepared.

    3. Re:Let's Compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. You need to move out of the sticks, or at least talk to people with a higher tooth:tattoo ratio.

      I'm not sure which is more pathetic - the alleged mediocre imagination you seem to think is endemic among Americans, or the way you seem to enjoy wallowing in said collective mediocrity.

    4. Re:Let's Compare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What's important is computers and robots"

      You do know that the U.S. invented both of these things don't you? You do know that the U.S. invented cable television and broadband technologies and satellite communication don't you? You do know that the U.S. invented cell phones don't you? None of that came out of Asia.

      You are clearly a wierd kid who lives in the suburbs watching too much anime and thinks that Ghost in the Shell is "imaginitave". I think you should actually travel to Asia and see how technically advanced it is. You might be suprised. It is mostly agricultural and poor. I think you are thinking that Asia==Tokyo.

      Name one great inventor that was Shinto and/or Asian.

    5. Re:Let's Compare by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Space can help us build space lasers and missiles and and what not. We can try to control things by threatening to lob rocks. Space-faring is cowboy mentality. That's our romance.
      Well, in the short run, electronics and information technology *will* become increasingly important. A century from now, when oil supplies begin to dwindle and if nuclear fission power is still deemed unacceptably risky, then who knows... We might want to have things like solar power stations in geosync beaming microwave energy down to the Earth. Not to mention that things like being able to deflect asteroids headed towards our planet might come in handy some day. Plus, there are planets and stars out there that we know nothing about and might want to learn about. In the long run, being able to leave this little, comfortable gravity well of ours will be much more useful to our species than having the latest cell phone with stereoscopic oil lenses, a trimensional laser image projector, and the ability to call up the latest tentacle pr0n from anywhere in the planet.

      There is zero integration between Christianity and Technology. There is zero integration between any radically conservative political or religious philosophy and the advancement of technology.

      -b.

  59. Yeah but... by J-Doggqx · · Score: 1

    ...why do we never get the good dating sims over here?

    --
    END OF LINE
  60. Obligatory DNF reference by sconeu · · Score: 5, Funny

    So do they have Duke Nukem Forever yet?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the award for "Post Most Unfairly Labeled a Troll" goes to ...

    2. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

      They did have it, but it referenced Taiwan as an independant nation, so China banned the game and destroyed all known copies.

    3. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      They said hot games. Remember the Dikatana.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    4. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by phoric · · Score: 1

      I also understand that the violent shooter-type games are not nearly as popular in Japan as they are in the US, and that they are mostly shunned.

    5. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by GCP · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Bad Americans. Gun nuts. Unlike Americans, the gentle Japanese find the idea of shootouts with dangerous armed bad guys much less attractive than fantasies of raping and torturing schoolgirls who are tied up and unable to fight back and prefer paper to electronic media for price, portability, and image quality.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    6. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's called:

      Dike Nuke Em Four Ever -- All You Base Edition

    7. Re:Obligatory DNF reference by Tombstone-f · · Score: 1

      I heard they were supposed to have it Today, but it was delayed.

  61. Sources by tangledweb · · Score: 1

    The article mentions dynamism.com, who have a great range but are very expensive.

    Another good source is conics.net. Crappy website, but much better prices. If you want something obscure, he is willing to buy it on yahoo auctions and ship it to you with a 10% markup.

    I bought both my Sharp Zaurus (linux PDA not available outside Japan) and my Panasonic W2 (ultralight laptop available worldwide, but with lower specs and much higher price than Japan) from conics.

  62. Redundant Article by fiber0pti · · Score: 1

    An article like this was on /. awhile ago. The reason the previous article said this is because the Japense are willing pay top dollar for the top of the line gadgets while Americans don't.

  63. please, don't make me puke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Japanese national currently residing in the US and seeing this article make me want to vomit. Comparing countries never does any good except generate the feelings I get when I see Bush praise god - cringe.

    My country does have more gadgets. This is really just because my countrymen are more willing to implements things. Also, I believe there are more hardware engineers in Japan vs. US. In america, most kids don't dream of being hardware engineers, americans want to be software programmers, writers, actors, and musicians. But industrial and mechanical engineering are both big fields in Japan.

  64. Consumer Addiction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Japanese/American Tech Deficit"

    Maybe we should retitle this. Why can't we be bigger consumers than we already are?

  65. They said, "Whoever gets to the landfill first!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dec. 9, 2004 --At Camp Buerhing in Kuwait on Wednesday, Wilson -- known as "Jerry" to family and friends -- asked Rumsfeld why the U.S. Army requires its soldiers to "dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal" to bolster armor on their vehicles.

  66. 120 / 80... Just one more reading, please!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What I want to know is if Johnny's taking a piss, how the hell is the toilet taking his blood pressure? Unless there's a cuff attaching to his ankle, I can only envision one other "appendage" from which a reading could be taken. Perhaps this explains the popularity of the toilet among Japanese males?

  67. I want the noodle protector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you know, the thing that goes around your head to keep your hair clean when you eat a bowl of noodles. Now *that*'s cool. Forget the cell phones.

  68. Wrong way round! by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Yeah, according to the article, the Japanese high tech gizmo market is driven in no small part ... by teenage girls.

    No. You misunderstand what that sentence meant; the Japanese teenage girls take their clothes off and perform various sexual acts with headless men. (*)

    Then people buy the tech gadgets to watch all this.

    (*) Seriously, you *never* see their damn heads. I'd guess this is because they're probably not that attractive, and it's easier to think of yourself in that position if you can't see it's someone else. I very much doubt it's because these guys would be ashamed of being seen fscking a cute Japanese girl.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Wrong way round! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be ashamed to be seen checking the filesystem of a cute Japanese girl.

  69. America is not a country. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    It is more like the EU. Nobody in their right minds would think that just because say Holland and Greece are in the same union that they are the same. So why do people think that places like New York and Texas are the same?

    Japan on the other hand is far far smaller ESPECIALLY the japan we are talking about. Lets face it, we are talking about urban japan here. There are probably rural areas in japan were people live like the more "rural" areas in america or europe.

    So why do they have more gadgets? Well why is the Philips (a dutch company) not available in holland? Why is the smart made by an american company only recently available in the US? Why was the german beetle car made the longest in mexico?

    We buy what is on sale and on sale is what sells but this is a dreamland capatalists fool themselves we live in.

    Any western store that carries the zaurus PDA can kiss the sales of all the other PDA's goodbye. Tiny phones are alright except the average person in holland is over two meters and that is the women. Perhaps their fingers need a slightly bigger keypad.

    It is a huge combination of factors that decide wich product does and does not sale. I have a pretty simple one. Caramel sauce. It is very nice, people in holland like it on the McD Sunday ice and in other ice. It is very cheap to make (burn sugar) compared to say fruit sauces AND yet it isn't sold in stores. None of the supermarkets carry it. Why do I have to go to a british store (for ex-pats) to get it?

    it used to be sold as part of a range from a local maker but for some reason supermarkets have stopped carrying it.

    Is there to little shelf space? Is there not enough demand? Explain the lack of caramel sauce on the shelfs of major dutch supermarkets and you got the whole gadget divide sorted as well. Sometimes products just stay in their own area. Sometimes they cross. Cookies are a good example. American cookies are constantly introduced here but never really seem to take off. Despite the fact the tastes are pretty similar. Thank god for international cities like Amsterdam were there is bound to be a store selling the foods of every culture. If you really want a japanese gadget, get it. Someone somewhere is selling it with english instructions.

    I just don't buy the explantion that if there is enough demand the major chains will carry it. There is enough demand for caramel sauce and for tivos over here.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  70. At least we don't have this... by mboos · · Score: 1

    Chindogu

    --
    --Mike Boos
  71. American's Get the Best Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this article a joke? American's get all the coolest toys first. Now name something the Japanese have that beats dropping a MOAB from a B2. That's what I call a cool gadget.

    1. Re:American's Get the Best Stuff by $criptah · · Score: 1

      This is funny in some sick way :)

  72. "Beneficial inventions"? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

    You mean like toilets that take your blood pressure and phones that play PacMan? Nobody's asking the important question here: do we really NEED all that shit? The problem with Americans is that they're not slacking off ENOUGH. Americans have been conditioned by generations of pervasive advertising to buy all the latest gadgets and all the latest clothes, then work two jobs to pay off their credit card debt. Few people consider the possibility that they might be happier if they buy LESS shiny crap.

  73. Well by xant · · Score: 1

    There may be some truth to this. Japan, after all, isn't allowed to arm itself since being on the losing side in WWII. And "defense" is the single biggest expense in our U.S. budget apart from paying the interest on the national debt. Japan still generates tons of money but doesn't have this enormous money pit to throw it into. Therefore, the entire country--the government itself--is like one of the people a previous poster mentioned, living at home with its parents and 100% disposable income. A lot of that money is inevitably going to land in product R&D, possibly by way of government infrastructure products that trickle down to consumer industries.

    (Ugh, I used the term "trickle down".)

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Well by coyote_oww · · Score: 1
      And "defense" is the single biggest expense in our U.S. budget apart from paying the interest on the national debt.

      Not so!

      http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/tables .html

      Table S-12, 80% of the way down the page provides the easiest summary to use to compare.

      FY2005 the USGOV is slated to spend $510 billion on Social Security vs. $429 billion on DoD. This doesn't count "homeland security" - it's a different department, but the SS payments don't count Medicare and Medicad; those are $290 and $188 billion each, respectively.

      Interest on the national debt is running at $176 billion. It's fifth or so - remember, interest rates have plummetted in recent years!

      Interestingly, the USGOV labels 62% of spending as "non-discretionary" including the big social programs (SS, Medicare, Medicad) and interest on the debt, and 38% "discretionary", of which about 47% is defense, the rest "non-defense".

    2. Re:Well by justins · · Score: 1
      Japan, after all, isn't allowed to arm itself since being on the losing side in WWII.

      One of the most potentially entertaining side-effects of "freedom" being on the march in the middle east is that Article 9 of Japan's constitution is in greater and greater jeopardy.

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4078815. st m
      http://www.asahi.com/english/opinion/TKY2004120 801 19.html

      It's not that there is anything wrong with your reading of their constitution but they are armed, nevertheless. Not to worry, I'm sure they'd never do anything rash.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    3. Re:Well by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Don't you watch Godzilla movies? Japan has a modern, relatively large, and very well-armed military... the only thing that's happened as a result of the WWII treaties is that it's called a "self-defense force" instead of an "army." Having it, however, and using it are two different things... for the time-being, it's being used as a self-defense force.

    4. Re:Well by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would really be a problem if the Japanese were re-armed anymore. It's not like the Germans after WWI after all. They have a strong democracy now, and are basically one of the stongest allies to the U.S. If anything, it would probably be in the best interest of the U.S. for Japan to be well-armed, especially with the North Korea situation as it is. It isn't as if they would bomb Pearl Harbor again.

  74. Lower risk and cost of frivolous litigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Japanese people don't file these scammy lawsuits against manufacturers, making the total cost of development and rollout much, much less than in the U.S.

    "But your honor... where does it specifically state NOT to use my video phone as an artificial heart? 2 million."

    1. Re:Lower risk and cost of frivolous litigation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the "I was stupid/clumsy and spilled hot coffee on my crotch when I should have exercised more caution in handling it, lets sue!" excuse which gets lots of defense from even here

  75. MD sucks by acoustix · · Score: 1

    The reason MD never took off was because it is a terrible format. Even hi-fi magazines had listening tests that showed cassettes with Dolby S were better than Sony's ATRAC system.

    -Nick

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:MD sucks by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      NetMD was decently cool for a little while. I had one and used it like an MP3 player, as you could fit 4 albums on a single MD with the LP4 option. They sounded like crap, but I was using shitty headphones anyway and I listened to it at the gym and on the bus and stuff so there was background noise. Definitely not for audiophiles, but for cheap music on the go it beat the hell out of MP3 players.

      Oh, and the fact that you got ~120 hrs battery life off a single AA battery... that was sweet. :)

    2. Re:MD sucks by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and with the new HI-MD units you now have a rival to the good old floppy. and with 1GB of storage space pr disc its not bad at all :) only problem is the write speed. oh and the media is magneto-optical and have its own case so its virtualy scratch proof :)

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:MD sucks by bebec · · Score: 1

      I work in live theatre, and I have to say that I found MD to be a fabulous format when running through soundtraks for a show during dress rehearsals. True, the sound quality may not be as high. What made MDs rock was that you could record every possible option for a particular sound effect, and with the appropriate player you could rearrange the order over and over and delete unnecessary tracks on the spot. No more having a sound designer take copious notes so they could fix things and bring a newly burned CD in for the next rehearsal. A few shows I've worked on went through dozens of versions (on CD-ROMs) before reaching a finalized version. What a waste of time and resources. Unfortunately, as discussed in other posts, the players are expensive and I believe this has kept more theatres from using this format.

    4. Re:MD sucks by Threni · · Score: 1

      > True, the sound quality may not be as high.

      It's just hard to get too excited about something which doesn't sound as good as stuff you've already got.

  76. Dave Farber and Akihabara by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I first met Dave Farber in ~1992. I was taking the train from DC back to New Jersey, and there was this old guy sitting across the table from me with the smallest laptop I'd ever seen, a cellphone smaller than a brick (Moto flip-phones were still amazing back then), and an alphanumeric Skypager. We started talking, and I recognized his name from various sources - his IP list was much smaller back then, and he'd been one of the advisors to the recently-formed EFF, and I was doing cypherpunk stuff with some of the same people. The laptop was an IBM Japan model, with Japanese keyboard, about six pounds, and it was quite a while before anything that light was available here. (And yes, it was a black rectangle design like most of the newer Thinkpads, but black was still cool back then.) He'd been toy-shopping at Akihabara.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  77. Wrong, as usual. by sakusha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The writer betrays his lack of understanding of the Japanese market, let alone culture. He blunders forward with the usual stereotypes, and totally fails to understand the fundamentals. The issue has nothing to do with "tribes," disposable income, or small housing.

    Japan is a small country, where fads rise and fall much more rapidly than in a larger country like the US. This means products tend to compete over much smaller market sectors, with much shorter market lives. Think about the Tamagotchi. Bandai couldn't keep up with demand, they built new factories to keep up with demand, but by the time the factories were ready, the fad had died. Bandai went into bankruptcy.
    Japanese markets are like a pressure cooker, products have short lives, and incremental improvements are added to produce new products to replace the old ones. This philosophy of "continuous improvement" is known as kaizen. Products in Japan evolve more rapidly than in other countries.
    Japanese consumers are also better educated than other countries. There is a whole industry of magazines devoted to the most miniscule details of every product on the market. I remember seeing one fashion magazine that spent 20 pages just discussing the quality of stitching in men's dress shirts. And Japanese computer magazines are the same, they put US magazines to shame. Japanese consumers will not put up with anything less than the best products, driving the kaizen cycle even faster.
    Japanese corporations are quick to take advantage of the home market. There are thousands of consumer products released in Japan that never make it to the international market, and this is intentional. Japan is the test market. Sometimes a product will go through several improvements before it's ready for larger world markets. Products that flop in Japan aren't even considered for internationalization. Japanese consumers are the beta testers of the world.

    1. Re:Wrong, as usual. by mikrorechner · · Score: 1
      Japan is a small country (...)
      Yeah, with a population of only 127 million people, making it the 3rd biggest market in the western industrialised world, it really is a small country...
      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    2. Re:Wrong, as usual. by flaming-opus · · Score: 1

      No. He's right about the disposable income thing.

      What's the #1 most sought after market in america as well as Japan? Teenagers. They don't make the most money, but it's all disposable. A few product segments sell exclusively to adults: cars, mortgages, dishwashers. However, the lifestyle products sell to kids who either spend their own money on the item, or talk their parents into buying it. Market research shows that the average teenager controls or directs almost $300 per week of spending. (lies, damn lies, and statistics)

      In Japan they just have a lot more 33 year old teenagers running around.

    3. Re:Wrong, as usual. by sakusha · · Score: 1
      ...the 3rd biggest market in the western industrialised world

      Last time I visited, Japan was in Asia, not part of the "Western world."

      Yes, Japan is a small country, in the sense of geography. Much of Japan is uninhabitable mountains, population density is highly compressed around the coastlines, most people live in metropolitan areas. Japan has one of the highest population densities in the world, if not the highest (depends on how they do the calculation).
      My point was that high population densities in a relatively small geographic area and a small population (compared to say, China or the US) lead to intense market competition.
    4. Re:Wrong, as usual. by sakusha · · Score: 1

      That may be so, but that point isn't actually in the article. I read the article a little closer, he didn't really mention disposable income except in the context of conspicuous consumption, which isn't really the stereotypical point we usually hear in this sort of article. But that doesn't prevent the writer from blundering ahead with other stereotypes. The conspicuous consumption era was over a long time ago. Perhaps the writer is unaware that consumer spending recently reached such lows that the Japanese government actually gave Y20000 coupons to every citizen, coupons that had to be spent immediately, to stimulate short-term consumption.

      Anyway, I personally think it's a big myth, we always hear about how Japanese have high levels of disposable income compared to other countries, but I'm convinced they have about the same relative levels of disposable income, it's just spent on different things. My monthly car payment is about the same as a month's subway commuting expenses in Tokyo.

    5. Re:Wrong, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...the 3rd biggest market in the western industrialised world
      >
      >
      > Last time I visited, Japan was in Asia, not part of the "Western world."

      Pretty good. You cut-n-pasted what you wanted to respond to, yet proceeded to misquote it. You, undoubtedly, have quite the future in management.

    6. Re:Wrong, as usual. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything except your "small country" comment.

      Unless you're speaking of the landmass and not the population that is. According to the CIA world factbook:

      Population:
      Definition Field Listing Rank Order
      127,333,002 (July 2004 est.)

      Versus the United States:

      Population:
      Definition Field Listing Rank Order
      293,027,571 (July 2004 est.)

      So whoopie, the USA is a whole double the population of a country smaller than California.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Wrong, as usual. by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was mostly speaking geographically, and I mentioned population density upthread. And even landmass is deceptive, as I mentioned upthread.
      The Japanese often describe their countrymens' mindset with the term "shimaguni konjou," which literally means "island country spirit," but also has two other aspects, primarily insularism and isolationism, but it also refers to the rapid way ideas propagate within Japan, and become the norm. This is one of the reasons fads and trends propagate so rapidly and intensely.

    8. Re:Wrong, as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Japan, only the world's second largest economy...who cares, right?

    9. Re:Wrong, as usual. by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      However, when making comments concerning what is essentially an economic argument, geographic size is not what people would normally assume you were talking about.
      Two things are facts: Japan is a small landmass, and it has a gigantic population with significant economic power.

      Which do you think was the most relevant to a discussion about purchasing and innovation trends ?

      Exactly

    10. Re:Wrong, as usual. by Gaarde · · Score: 0

      I thought it had to do with the USA patent system and the resulting money waisted on lawyers. Silly me.

    11. Re:Wrong, as usual. by Gaarde · · Score: 0

      I thought it had to do with the broken patent system and the cost of the resulting lawyers fees. Silly me.

  78. Who Cares? by $criptah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can somebody tell me why we should care about it? Seriously, if Japan has cooler toys, more power to them. Who the fuck cares? Are you really upset because you cannot get your e-mail faster? At this point of time, Americans behave like crowds of cattle when it comes to shopping.... Would you like to put more spin onto that?

    I certainly do not. Stuff is not what we should care about because as long as we do so, we will always be unhappy with something. Remeber, grass is greener on the other side. I can't believe that this bullshit makes to Slashdot nowadays. Seriously, it sounds like a bunch of stupid teenage girls who complain about boots, dresses and shirts that do not fit.

    I can get upset because U.S. students lag behind in math and science, but not because somebody has a cooler DVD camera. Give me a break... P.S.: It is not what you have, it is what you do with it.

    1. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, brother. I know this is a geek site, but let's try to have some unbiased perspective here. Gadgets are fun when you first pick them up and open the box. After about a week, unless they really are useful to you, they get old and you forget about them. This cycle of buying new and "better" gadgets gets old after a while.

    2. Re:Who Cares? by soxin7 · · Score: 1

      I think you said it best with "The grass is always greener...". I couldn't agree more. Why in the world does this even make it on /. ? Who cares indeed....

    3. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not just talking toys, we are talking tech. Many focus on toys but what about medical technology? Have you considered that?

      Japan vs. USA, guess which has the longer life expectancy...

  79. Is that a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They get all the cool shit first because THEY FUCKING MAKE IT. Jesus!

    Next question!

  80. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wow, that's really insightful and interesting.

    Hey ... wait a minute...I think I've heard that before....hmmm, where was it...OH YEAH! It's ripped almost verbatim from Alton Brown's new book.

  81. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally disagree about the food. I've been to Europe a couple of times on vacation and the most dissappointing thing was the food. I always, -always- heard about how good the food is in Europe.

    It was OK - but not as good as at a the US restaurants I frequent (Not McDonalds, but certainly not upscale/5*). Sure there are some great things you can get in Europe that you can't get here, but I'll take:

    1. US variety of food (Chinese, Indian, Spanish, Thai, Italian, Mexican - oh god, Mexican, Japanese, Cajun, Korean, etc.) All relatively close to my house (in the suburbs). All good.
    2. Everything seems fresher in the US. Again, maybe its that I was a tourist, but thats just the way it was.
    3. Service. We met some friends who had a (well-behaved) 2 year old. The restaurant would not even take our order.

    I honestly think that when people talk about good food in Europe, the're comparing restaurants to McDonalds/BK/Pizza(gag)Hut/etc. Comparing apples (sit-down restaurants) to oranges (fast-food) is pointless.

  82. "...let's put this into perspective..." by asr_man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Johnny lives in ... a cramped three-bedroom apartment shared with his parents and his teenage sister.

    Yes, let's.

    No amount of technology could sufficiently drive such a dismal reality from my mind. Not that Johnny Sokko would necessarily say that. Nevertheless I'm grateful that where I lived enabled me to escape it entirely.

    1. Re:"...let's put this into perspective..." by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if you're never home, what's the big deal? Other than getting some nookie while your mom is down the hall which is just a bit disturbing...

  83. America has become a country. by Little+Brother · · Score: 1
    The Uninted States of America was never intended to be a country, true. Its constitution is for a group of soverign states, true. But what was supposed to be, and what is on paper, does not define what is. The USA is a country. It has a common culture (true there are regional differences, but there are also regional differences between Tokyo and Osaka about as great.) a predominant language and a common group of laws and economic system. Its armed forces are under centralized control and laws made at the federal level trump laws made at any other level.

    The USA is an empire. About half of its territory was taken by force during the "civil war" after said territories tried to back out of the union of supposadably soverign states. The fact that they were retaken by force shows that states are no longer soverign. To be more honest the US should rename the term "State" to province or perferstructure or something, but it enjoys pretending that it exsits now, how it was always supposed to, and makeing such a drastic change in terminology would force the admission that this was not the founding fathers' intention.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

    1. Re:America has become a country. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The USA is an empire. About half of its territory was taken by force during the "civil war" after said territories tried to back out of the union of supposadably soverign states

      The Confederate states account for 17% of the US land area. The US is the only country in the world larger than 500km^2 to acquire over 50% of its land area by purchasing it, as opposed to military conquest.

    2. Re:America has become a country. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And where in the US Constitution does it say that the states are sovereign? The Constitution prohibited states from maintaining armed forces or making treaties among themselves. Hardly what I would call sovereign.

  84. Re:Sigh, I tire of your Sigh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, how annoying of a phrase that is used often now on /.

    sigh.

    coohhh.

    bzztkrrt.

    ugh.

  85. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot just fulfilled its mission statement:

    News for Nerds

    Stuff that matters.

    As this is the culmination of all that is /. , let this be its last story.

  86. IMO not a fair characterization by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My observation is that Japanese companies tend to use their domestic market as their paying beta testers. What this means is that the latest gears will go through revisions/improvements base on domestic market feedback before being unleashed on North America. The gest of it is that we'll always be a year or two slower than Japanese domestic market.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  87. I for one.... by gmletzkojr · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new nude female aliens with magical powers overlords.

    No, really, I do.

    Or, the superhero cyborg schoolgirls would also do.

    --
    I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
  88. Too much risk in the US by Xian97 · · Score: 1

    Many of the new products released in the Japanese market would run risks of legal action if released in the US. Any new product or innovation stands the chance of having to run through a legal gauntlet in the American court system. Look at things like Creative's Rio and the court battles they had to go through to release the first consumer MP3 player stateside. As long as the *AA and other copyright owners hold a legal cudgel over the US technology companies if they create a device that *might* infinge on a copyright, then the innovators will have to reside offshore.

  89. Chicken or the egg? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know anybody that actually believes that saying overly much. To some degree, I buy it simply because it's so easy to be a teacher since the payrate is so low.

    It all comes down to why they became teachers.

    I also say "Radio Shack: you have questions. We have blank stares." This is a similar thing: they stopped paying electricians enough to work at Radio Shack and replaced them by barely trained cell phone salesman monkeys. Anyone capable of actually answering my questions who is working at Radio Shack isn't doing it for the money.

    I'll stop thinking that no one with a marginally good grasp of engineering works at Radio Shack when they start making a decent wage. I'll start thinking that teachers have as good a grasp as working professionals in the fields when they pay them a decent wage.

    Oh, except any history teacher who prefers to be called "Coach." Those, I think, don't really know anything about history, and never will.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Chicken or the egg? by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "I buy it simply because it's so easy to be a teacher since the payrate is so low"

      Not sure how one has to do with the other. More importantly, after my certification requirements, I have completed enough school and training to qualify for a Master's degree (easliy). I had to have a Bachelor's degree in a qualifying area (not just any degree, certain subjects only) just to get an interview. It's probably harder to get my job than yours.

      Teachers are paid poorly because they are piad with tax money, and people are cheap. Please try to inform yourself before you (inadvertantly?) slam other's professions.

    2. Re:Chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't really sound like he was slamming the profession. Sounded more like he was saying that they weren't getting the pay they deserved.

      And he had the line about any electrician working at Radio Shack isn't doing it for the money. This sounded like a long way of saying that there is the possibility of numerous excellent teachers doing it for the love of the field.

      Although I will have to disagree with the line about teachers being paid low salary because it's tax money. At least where I am from (Milwaukee, WI) public school teachers are paid SIGNIFICANTLY more than private school teachers for the same age level. Now imagine if public schools were properly funded to the point where the teachers didn't have to buy their own supplies and books... And if teachers were actually given the right to punish students through expulsion, flunking, or other meaningful activities without parents coming in complaining that "The teacher flunked the kid" rather than yelling at the kid for flunking.

    3. Re:Chicken or the egg? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have a fair idea about what I'm talking about thanks to my fraternity, which happened to be a music fraternity. Half of the people in there who were training to become professional musicians were going to be teachers (and then there were five or so who were becoming teachers in other domans...strange coincidence). Also, my mom is a teacher.

      You are very wrong about the amount of certification you need if you think it's the same as a masters degree. I'm finishing up my masters degree as I speak in EE after my seventh year, while my teacher friends were out and teaching in four years. Further, the one friend that I had who was teaching Math didn't even have to take calculus because he wasn't going to be teaching it. In other words, he didn't know as much about the subject as pretty much any engineering student right out of school (or even as I did out of high school).

      This is not what I would call high quality in teaching. I would suggest that you try working in the private sector for a while and then teach afterward. It might open your eyes.

      Sure, there are plenty of very, very good teachers. I had some. But they'll take anybody because they have to fill all the positions, and there aren't enough of those very, very good ones to go around. Are you saying you didn't have a single teacher who was a glorified babysitter?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:Chicken or the egg? by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Listen, I read your post, and frankly, you're just regurgitating the same things you said in your previous post.

      I DID work in the private sector, as a Certified Associate Behavior Analyst, before I chose to get out of working with autistic students.

      As for my certs and training, I stand by my statement. I'm nearly done with my PhD, so I do know from whence I speak.

      As for the rest of your post, more anecdotal evidence that really isn't true. Tell all the stories you want, I've been through it, I know the truth.

      Why do you assume you know more about it than I do? How long have you been teaching?

    5. Re:Chicken or the egg? by r_j_howell · · Score: 1

      IANAT, but I'm maried to a teacher. Private school teachers are pretty much always paid worse than public school teachers. And often worse than McDonalds clerks. I've seen a few public school teachers take the cut in pay, and the reasons were eiter that in private schools, you get a lot more parent buy-in (litteraly and figuratively) and that makes it much easier to teach, or (in a similar grain) problem students can actualy be kicked out of school, again loweirng teacher stress. I also met one teacher who was a strong believer in a teaching philosophy that had fallen out of favor in the local public schools, and went to a private school that agreed with her philosophy. I'm going to propose a different idea why teachers get paid less: It's hard for an individual teacher to quantify their financial contribution. Not that they don't make one, but it's hard to put together a peice of paper that shows how much it is. When you think of overpaid professions, you see ones where a person CAN easily demonstrate what they bring in. Tom Cruise, can show haw many more tickets are going to be sold just because his name is on a marquee, so can Bitney Spears and Shaquilie ONeal. CEOs justify their salaries by saying "the company brings in X billion dollars under my leadership, It would be foolish not to give me X/n billion to keep that coming in"

  90. You mean China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What cool gadgets? Pretty much anything that is available there is available here, and most of it is made in China now anyway. Japan's economy has been in a slump for so long--and might dive again soon. In order to lower costs the Japanese have culled back on their tradition of lifelong employment and resorted to outsourcing. That's why even their animation is coming from South Korea and India now.

  91. If you ask me... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    ... if I had to choose between a "cool" electronic toys and a 5 bedroom house sitting on 5 acres, I'd chose the latter without a second thought.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:If you ask me... by $criptah · · Score: 1

      Amen to that, brother. When my family was poor, I wanted to get as much $$$ as I could and buy a lot of expensive toys. Four years of college and real-life taught me that otherwise.

      Now that I have some money to burn, it is definitely not going into something that goes down in price faster than Monica went down on Billy Clinton :) House vs a nice TV... That's a no fucking brainer to me.

  92. Couldn't be because by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's easier to get products to market in Japan without being regulated to death? And here in the litigation-happy USA we'll sue any of you almond-eyed little weasels trying to import anything that isn't completely, 100% idiot proof. Because here we have no responsibility for our personal choices. If we decide to use one of your electronic gizmos as a tub toy and that electrically powered instrument isn't clearly marked DO NOT USE AS A TUB TOY, we're going to sue your ass.

    Because this is the country where we have to put stickers on pop machines that say if you pull this pop machine over on yourself you might die, where we have to print DO NOT DRIVE WITH SUN SHIELD IN PLACE on the back of cardboard sun screens and PULL TAB TO OPEN because sure as you're born there will be some idiot trying to cut the top of the can off with his pocket knife and he'll slip and cut himself.

    Yes, we've really become that stupid. Just look at who we elected president any time you're tempted to doubt it.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Couldn't be because by Heian-794 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Litigation-happy is the right word. Here in Japan, companies can release really cool, but buggy and defective, technology without the fear of customers returning it in droves. It's just too difficult to return any product in Japan that people give up and buy new ones. Contrast that with the US where you can sometimes return a book to the store even after obviously reading it, or returning clothing. Inconceivable in Japan, sometimes even when the defect is the company's fault -- the army of lawyers in the US would never allow such a state of affairs.

    2. Re:Couldn't be because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >Because this is the country where we have to put stickers on pop machines that say if you pull this pop machine over on yourself you might die, where we have to print DO NOT DRIVE WITH SUN SHIELD IN PLACE on the back of cardboard sun screens and PULL TAB TO OPEN because sure as you're born there will be some idiot trying to cut the top of the can off with his pocket knife and he'll slip and cut himself.

      I really like the new signs at the bottom of the public swimming pools: No smoking.

    3. Re:Couldn't be because by srock2588 · · Score: 1

      Hey its a pessimistic liberal talking. Yes that sentence is redundant.

      --
      Ehh...this is the life we chose.
    4. Re:Couldn't be because by HangingChad · · Score: 1
      You'd be wrong making that assumption. I'm as conservative as they come and have the family credentials to prove it.

      The modern right wing in the US are not conservatives, they're neocons. A blend of religion, big business and big government. True conservatives find them in many ways offensive.

      You're assuming anyone disagreeing with you is a liberal. I imagine that reduces politics to a mental level you can tolerate.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  93. Huh? by Nopal · · Score: 1
    In Europe you're allowed to make and sell things that contain non-pasturized dairy products. In the US, you're not.

    I think that you have to differentiate between "make" and "sell". I routinely buy cheese in Mexico and bring it accross the border legally. I can even sell it legally. The border officials I've dealt with have never given a hoot about the cheese that I bring across. One even commented was that the cheese I was bringing in was his favorite. I've done some research on the subject, and importing dairy products is surprisingly easy and has surprisingly few restrictions (a permit and a quota), and I don't believe that pasteurization is a requirement for imported products.

    Having said that, I am would not be surprised that making cheese here in the US may be subject to totally different rules.

    There are some stores that specialize in selling imported European cheeses. If you miss European cheese that much you may want to research and give one a call.

    1. Re:Huh? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I've done some research on the subject, and importing dairy products is surprisingly easy and has surprisingly few restrictions (a permit and a quota), and I don't believe that pasteurization is a requirement for imported products.

      Are these hard, aged, cheeses? There are less restrictions on aged goods, which is why I specified "young" cheeses in my post.

    2. Re:Huh? by Nopal · · Score: 1
      Not all of the cheeses I bring are aged and hard (asadero, a string-like type cheese but softer is one of my favorites), but even if they were aged, we are still talking about products that may not have been made from pasteurized milk.

      Then again, I'm a sucker for well-made Mexican cheeses (which are far superior than the downright terrible American-made versions). But I'm no expert on what is consumed on the other side of the pond, so I don't know if you could find "young" European imports for sale around here. You could be correct on that point.

    3. Re:Huh? by Nopal · · Score: 1

      BTW, asadero cannot be aged and is almost always sold very fresh.

  94. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

    This is tangential, but:

    FCC regulations are actually notably more lax than the comparable CE regs for consumer electronics. A lot of this may be due to the high density of population in europe/japan as compared to the US. That is, when you have a more product-dense environment, you have to set the bar higher for emissions. IAAEEICPD. (I am an electrical engineer in consumer product design)

    The root cause of Japan's superior gadgetology is Japanese culture, and Japanese tech infrastructure:

    1: They buy the super-cool gadgets and phones in large numbers, while Americans are relative Luddites. High literacy, education, and high pop. density amplify the fad-effect.

    2: Very roughly, Japan has ~1/3 the total US population, in about the same space as california. For radio-based services, like cell/SMS, you can reach many times more people with the same equipment.

    To wit: We have corridors of cell coverage along our interstates in many places, but also have ten-thousand-square-mile swaths in the mountains and deserts where there are no towers and no people at all.

    In Japan, on the other hand, you would be hard-pressed to throw a dart into a map and land on a square mile containing less than 100 people. Even greater concentrations of population in cities exaggerates the effect.

    Japan's population density was 327 people per square kilometer in 1990. The US is more like 30 people per square kilometer --

    1) Take a business plan built around distributing a wireless service, or having a physical retail presence within N miles of M people
    2) Increase population density 10-fold
    3) ???
    4) Profit!!!

  95. Whatever happened to irradiated food?... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Damn; irradiation was the 'GM' food of its day. I was watching an old episode of Red Dwarf (the first one, I think, made in 1987). They were going over a list of supplies, and one of the items was an "irradiated haggis".

    And I realised I'd totally forgotten about that fiasco; irradiated food died a death. I remember complaints about the loss of nutritional value, but let's face it; *no-one* was going to buy food that sounded like it might be associated with *anything* radioactive.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  96. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I know this means nothing in the grand scheme, but I know a guy that lives in the US but travels several times a year. One thing he's found is that he can drink European milk but American milk gives him problems, I think he said it was due to something in the US pasteurization methods.

  97. Applies to cars, too by ibi · · Score: 1

    Try to get stability control or all-wheel-drive on a Japanese sedan in the US. With few exceptions (stability control is starting show up as an option on a few Toyota models) Japanese automakers keep the good stuff for their luxury lines in the US.

    Overseas you can get advanced features on their mainline models.

    For cell phones I see why the lack of infrastructure in the US limits importation, but I don't understand what the deal is with the cars.

    1. Re:Applies to cars, too by darken9999 · · Score: 1

      Um... have you ever seen a Japanese person drive? They need it. :^)

    2. Re:Applies to cars, too by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Try to get stability control or all-wheel-drive on a Japanese sedan in the US.
      OTOH, the Japanese do make some really nifty cars without the above gadgets. Look at the Toyota MR-Spyder and Mazda Miata[*] for starters. Handling to rival a Porsche for about 1/2 the price.

      -b.

      [*]- Yes, I do know that the original design was American, but no American company had the balls to produce a small sports convertible in the mid to late 80s. The Pontiac Fiero was the closest to that type of car, and the first examples were misdesigned abominations that overheated and occasionally caught fire. By the time Pontiac worked the quirks out of the design, sales were down and GM killed the model.

  98. Do the older people in Japan adopt tech? by telemonster · · Score: 1

    In the US, the older generations often seem to stumble with technology. I'm not trying to stereotype, but think of the VCR 12:00 clock issue.

    Do the older generations in Japan adopt the technology gadgets, or do the units mostly exist in the hands of the younger like in the states?

    (Yes, I know there execeptions, and I know that older folks carry cell phones in the US).

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    1. Re:Do the older people in Japan adopt tech? by ashitaka · · Score: 1

      As the article states and others have pointed out, the tech revolution is being driven by the young people living at home with O-tosan and O-kaasan.

      My parents in law won't even use the VCR bought for them by my brother-in-law let alone set the time.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  99. Maybe we don't want them? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm off on this, but perhaps the vast majority of Americans have no use for things like portable PlayStations and other such toys.

    The article also mentions investment in technological infrastructure and heavy subsidies to the tech industry. I won't get into subsidies here, but I can certainly get into infrastructure.

    Infrastructure is easy to build in countries with high population density. The cost of the infrastructure per person served is low. This is why many European countries have wonderful rail systems and why countries like Japan have high-speed cell networks and high broadband penetration. The population density is higher, and the distance between major metropolitan areas is shorter.

    Compare that to the United States. Here we have vast spaces of sparsely populated land. It is not very costworthy to put in cell towers in the middle of South Dakota, for instance, or deliver broadband to ranchers in the Salmon River valley in Idaho. Even if 100% of the people in the area served bought the service, it would be either too expensive for the customers or be a money-losing venture.

    So, in the end, what we have are pockets of populations (urban and suburban areas) that actually do have access to all of the infrastructure needed by 'cool' gadgets. You then run into a cultural difference.

    Personally, I don't have much of a need to carry video games with me wherever I go. I carry a Palm Zire 31, and I use it to keep my address book and calendar This is the only gadget I carry. I don't own a cell phone, and will avoid having one for as long as possible. I used to have a cell phone, but I quickly got rid of it once my contract expired.

    I, for one, do not like being able to be contacted 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. "Just turn it off, you say?" Well, my option is better, and here is why: If you don't own a cell phone, everyone understands that and they don't actually get to pick up the phone and dial. They are never bothered by you not being at your home number. If you have a cell phone, on the other hand, and they dial you and get your voice mail, they are pissed off because they couldn't reach you. You have a cell phone, after all!

    Then there is the matter of people just annoying the crap out of me with their cell phones. I am a slightly older (late 20s) college student. All these ill-mannered children (the freshman/sophomores) I have to go to school with leave their phones on in class, and some actually answer them in class. Furthermore, if their phone rings during an exam, I just want to strangle them. Oh, and there's nothing like trying to go to a nice restaurant with my wife, and having some moron on their cell phone in the next booth talking so loud that most of the other people in the restaurant understand what the conversation is about.

    Oh, and there was the guy who took like 500 flash photos with his digital camera in a restaurant, from a table away with the flash aimed right in my direction. I almost went to jail that night...

    All this has really made me relatively anti-gadget. Especially anti-phone gadget. Not that I don't own cool stuff. I have a digital camera, and a laptop computer, etc. I just don't need them on me all of the time.

    Sorry if this sounds like a rant. Well, I guess it is, but I'm just trying to make the point that Japan is Japan, and here in America (and all you people who think that the United States and it's citizens who have been calling themselves 'America' and 'Americans' for hundreds of years should change because you can't make a contextual distinction can shove it...) we don't all necessarily want the gadgets, nor is it cost effective to provide for all of the United States to have the infrustructure for all of the fancy internet-enabled ultra-high resolution spy-camera radio communicator walkie-talkie GPS PDA cell phones.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your vehement rejection of cell phone technology does not make you a charismatic iconoclast, a trendy counter-culture hero, or a beautiful and unique snowflake. It makes you that guy your co-workers all hate because they can never reach you if they need help.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    2. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a smaller territory nation can develop more than a larger nation the solution is not to deride the smaller nation but to divide the larger nation. Many times I have read of complaints of the size differentials being so great as to preclude comparison of the US technological level with any nation but Russia(3 times over in territory) and China(2 time over in territory); China is developing in some areas very quickly though, and the mafia is becoming more economical in Russia so it is improving as civil projects succeed. There is no excuse, the US is overly large and currently does not have the capacity for development of a nation three times over its size in territory, or a nation that has actual productive value (not GDP as that is inflated by unproductive fund exchanges form lawsuits) that will be twice that of the US next year. Break that nation into manageable parts and perhaps more than 30% can be represented in the resultant national governments as well as improving capacity for some to develop technologically.

    3. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by McFarlane · · Score: 1

      Canada has a population even sparser and further spreadout yet it ranks above the USA and Japan in broadband adoption.

      "The International Telecommunication Union
      reports that in 2002 the five top nations for broadband network
      market penetration were: Korea, Hong Kong, Canada, Taiwan and
      Denmark. The ITU ranks the United States eleventh in broadband
      penetration. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and
      Development reports that in middle 2003 the top market
      penetration for member nations occurred in: Korea, Canada,
      Iceland, Denmark and Belgium with the United States ranked
      tenth."

      --
      [We don't come from a planet. We come from a grid sector.]
    4. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      Even at work, I want to strangle the jerk who leaves his ringer on during a presentation. It's inconsiderate when your boss is trying to present and some new hire's lame cell phone ringtone interrupts him. If I only had some mod points for you....

    5. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? If they have a problem at work and can't get ahold of you, that's their problem, not yours.

    6. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      let's not forget to save a free hand to also strangle the morons who always use the speaker of their phone...for their voicemails, when they talk to a real person, when they're on hold for meetings, etc.etc.

      I'm tempted to do some after-hours surgery on some of these phones

    7. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Canada has a population even sparser and further spreadout yet it ranks above the USA and Japan in broadband adoption.

      Yeah, but Canada also has 90% of its population amassed within 100 miles of its border with the United States. Aside from being a chief military concern of U.S. citizens like myself (kidding!), it means that most of Canada's population is in a band 100 miles wide and a few thousand miles long. In the United States there are a couple such bands along each coast, and the rest of the population is concentrated around pockets here and there. Much harder to plan infrastucture for.

      Besides, some of us don't see much of a need for broadband. I'm don't have cable TV (jeeze people, get out of the house and darken up!), and still have 56K dial-up (which conveniently makes the internet more like a book and less like TV).

      If I really need high-speed access, I walk down the street and get on one of the public access WiFi hotspots that are around here. This is usually only necessary when a new version of one of my favorite Linux distributions is released and I need the ISOs.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by McFarlane · · Score: 1

      I agree that the geographic distribution is different between Canada and the US. But where it differs it differs in that Canada's is even sparser and widely spread. Canada and the US have a population distibution much more comparable than Canada (or the US) and Japan/Korea/Belgium.

      The point that I am disputing is that it is the geographic distribution of population that answers for the difference between the US and Japan/Korea/Belgium. It must be something else as well.

      (In no way am I saying Canada is "better")

      --
      [We don't come from a planet. We come from a grid sector.]
    9. Re:Maybe we don't want them? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      The point that I am disputing is that it is the geographic distribution of population that answers for the difference between the US and Japan/Korea/Belgium. It must be something else as well.

      I agree that there is something else or several somethings else. I think a lot of it is culture and there is also an amount of baby boomers (a large population group itself) and older people who do not have any use for the internet and broadband.

      Case in point would be my father: He's never surfed the web or even sent an e-mail. Doesn't own a computer, either. My mom does all that. He does, however, have a 4dtv system, which makes cable and digital mini-dishes look like garbage, but that's his shining example of technology adoption. He prefers classic cars over computers any day.

      I imagine that farmers out in the midwest probably have adopted digital satellite, but largely haven't made use of the internet or two-way broadband. I've never asked, but I should, next time I'm in the middle of nowhere.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  100. Their hardware is great for sure, but... by pario · · Score: 1

    I am a Japanese and therefore very proud of skilled hardware engineers and their products from my country. However, there is still one area in the technology industry in which the United States is undoubtedly far ahead of Japan: operating systems for personal computers. Although we do have some OSes in Japan, the most notable example of which is BTRON designed by Dr. Ken Sakamura of TRON fame, they are not comparable to their American counterparts by any measure in terms of functionality and the size of user base. Even though I would be hesitant to characterize products from Redmond as excellent, I use PowerBook G4 and OS X myself and I just love them. Even most Linux/*BSD hackers are either originally from the United States or have U.S. citizenship. The current state is really a shame for Japan, but it has deep roots in structural problems in society that stifles creativity and the abysmal state of the software industry in the nation with ridiculously underpaid programmers who suffer extremely long hours. Although I wish the situation would be otherwise, I do not think it will change in the foreseeable future.

  101. i call BS by lingqi · · Score: 1

    stop making excuses for the lazy behemoth that the phone companies had become in the US. densly packed or not, that's not the point at all; It's not that NY or Chicago or Bay area or Los angeles is any less packed than japan, and just by exploring these highly contentrated areas you can still cover the majority of the population.

    did you know that I get FOMA (3G) coverage way off in the boondocks in japan, in the middle of a ricefield? Heck, Gunma is like the redneck country in Japan - there are not even enough railroads in a country famous for public transportation so that the prefecture has the highest car-ownership in the country - but don't worry, you will get fantastic coverage pretty much everywhere you'd want to go.

    heck, I go hiking in the middle of a mountain and i still get mova (mobile internet) coverage so i can check train schedules while i am still on the top of a mountain.

    don't be silly, "densly packed" is just an excuse; do you work for the phone company or something?

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:i call BS by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      You're completely disregarding the fact that the US is far larger than Japan in terms of area. Blanketing a single US state with cellular and wireless internet service is one thing -- blanketing all fifty is quite another.

      Besides which, even if some company (or companies) were to say, cover all of California (only about 10% larger than Japan) with cellular service, they'd end up only being able to service a customer base approximately four times smaller than that of Japan. Doesn't really make much financial sense does it? And that's our MOST densely populated state. Let's not even consider what a financial disaster blanketing Wyoming with cellular service would be...

    2. Re:i call BS by Cereal+Box · · Score: 1

      Didn't mean most densely populated state -- I meant the state with the largest population.

    3. Re:i call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      state size doesn't even matter; all you have to do is cover the metropolitan areas and expand outward as time / resources permit.

      there are no reason why metro areas are not covered with 3G broadcasts, highspeed internet access, and whatever. fallback to basic coverage once you get out of the city. Is it so hard to imagine?

  102. Bad consumers by tedrlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what the article is telling us is that Americans are crappy consumers compared to the Japanese. If we'd only spend all our money on new, expensive, and mostly useless gadgets every six months, we'd catch right up to them.

    C'mon people! These megacorporations want to help you, but you need to put in some effort first! Where's your national pride?

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
    1. Re:Bad consumers by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Also cause we can't make a Lincoln-logs building without getting the death penalty for patent infringement. But hey, both work

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    2. Re:Bad consumers by tedrlord · · Score: 1

      Man, I used to love Lincoln Logs as a kid. But you're right, it was annoying having to hide the little houses in the basement when the neighbor kid's tip-off leads to a government raid. Though on the bright side, I got at least two dozen cabin patents myself before I turned eight. You know the kind that looks like an 'L'? That's all mine.

      --
      [insert witty quote here]
  103. At least we are free by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

    Cool gadgets mean that the terrorists won!

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  104. Wrong! by agent · · Score: 1

    www.apple.com

    See you in 2005.
    Peace,
    -Steve

  105. A better explanation - Patents.... by argoff · · Score: 1

    Any inventor of a better mouse trap knows what I'm talking about. Make an invention in the US, advertize it in the papers, and it won't be long before you get a bunch of letters threatening to sue you. Not only that, but the nature of us patnets makes it impossible to integrate. If you make a car with ford like brakes, and a GM like engine, don't be supprised if you get sued by both of them - nope anyone who really wants to make a usefull invention has to absolutely start from scratch.

    In japan, some of this is overcome with government micromanaging of business and regulation, and other parts of these problems are overcome with less agressive patnet enforcement (on foriegn patents epsecially)

  106. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by xenicson · · Score: 1

    "In Europe you're allowed to make and sell things that contain non-pasturized dairy products. In the US, you're not"
    Not entirely true... I can go down to my local co-op and get quite a few dairy products that are not pasturized... and occationally I can find non-pasturized cheeses in the local specialty foods stores.

  107. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Not entirely true...

    You are correct. If something is aged for long enough I believe that you are then allowed to import it.

  108. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by westlake · · Score: 1
    In the US, you're not. Apparently americans aren't allowed to determine for themselves what is or isn't an acceptable risk.

    Unpasteurized dairy products are historically linked to many dangerous bacterial infections, such as Brucellosis. Europeans are not immune. Human Listeriosis Outbreaks Linked to Dairy Products in Europe

  109. Tech Deficit? Our houses are bigger than theres. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    The average American McMansion has around 2500 sq feet and practically an acre of land. I doubt most people in Japan have that much real estate. After all, didn't Japan pioneer those hotels that are just little cubes you can barely fit in? Yeah, Americans like their technology, but they loved having big houses and lots of land even more.

    --
    This is my sig.
  110. What the hell are you talking about? by donutello · · Score: 1

    Nice troll.

    The FDA regulates how food is made in the US. However, it does not regulate what food you bring in to the country. I've brought food in, many, many times without problems.

    The USDA does regulate what you are bringing in to make sure you don't bring in any fruit or vegetable or basically any product that can be used as a seed. The situation they are trying to prevent is where you plant a weed that grows uncontrollably and destroys a significant amount of crops or other plant life.

    You can sell European-made cheese in the US with no problems. That's the reason why OBGyn's tell pregnant women to ensure that any soft cheeses they eat were made in the US.

    To make matters worse, they've convinced people here that "ultra-pasturized" means "better",

    You mean like the Europeans have convinced their citizens that "Genetically Modified" foods will cause mutations in people who eat them?

    I suspect you're just trolling.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I suspect you're just trolling.

      I'm trolling because you think I referred to the wrong agency? Give me a break.

      Besides that I'm not even wrong. The FDA does deal with imports. The USDA controlls imports on an economic and agricultural level, but the FDA is responsible for the safety of imports.

      Observe: http://www.fda.gov/ora/import/default.htm

      And a quote from said page:

      With the exception of most meat and poultry, all food, drugs, biologics, cosmetics, medical devices, and electronic products that emit radiation, as defined in the FD&C and related Acts, are subject to examination by FDA when they are being imported or offered for import into the United States. Most meat and poultry products are regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

      Now. Are you trolling?

    2. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by donutello · · Score: 1

      My comment had nothing to do with which agency was doing the monitoring but everything to do with what was actually done.

      I pointed out that it's possible to buy European made cheese in the US, for example - even though that cheese had not been pasteurized. I pointed out what specifically is restricted - which is very different from what you described in the grandparent.

      And as for the quote you've referenced, it can be summarized as: The FDA can examine imported food that emits radiation. Wow, what a police state we live in!

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The FDA can examine imported food that emits radiation. Wow, what a police state we live in!

      Electronics that emit radiation, not food that emits radiation. "electronics that emit radiation" was one item in the list; it was not a list of things that emit radiation.

      Also, as other people in this thread have been so kind to reference, the restriction, upheld by the FDA, is that you cannot sell in the US cheese that was made with raw milk unless it has been aged at least 60 days.

      You're wrong, and you're going to have to come to terms with it.

  111. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by tyen · · Score: 1

    I've been to Europe a couple of times on vacation and the most dissappointing thing was the food.

    Your results might depend upon your expectations and willingness to explore, or simply we visited different parts of Europe. For example, my personal all time favorite restaurant is a tie between two: Lyon de Lyon in Lyon, France and Atelier in New York City. But that is for the multi-course tasting menu (with a wine paired to match each course); if you go to either place for just a steak, you are likely to be unimpressed, especially for the prices.

    On the other hand, in Southern France we still enjoyed ourselves when we just stopped into different restaurants that hit our fancy, some of them little hole in the wall places. The food was definitely fresh (I prefer seafood, and am extremely sensitive to any spoilage because I can smell ammonia starting in very low concentrations).

    European restaurants definitely have different ideas of service than American restaurants, but I ascribe this to a cultural difference. More European restaurants are simply much more concerned about the total experience they offer to their patrons, and I'm not surprised some simply have a blanket no-toddlers policy. Whereas I've noticed American restauranteurs are generally willing to take a chance on all comers, and only confront parents if their children are really obnoxious; they usually politely ask the parents to restrain the children for their own safety because of all the hot plates running around, for example.

    Most of my points of reference come from Southern France, Rhine Valley Germany, Belgium and Holland, so I'm curious what part(s) of Europe you had experience with.

  112. I've said it before... by KanSer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and I'll say it again. The only reason Japan and Japanese have these sweet 500$ cell-phones is because they see it as a perfectly good investment every 6 months to a year. They relish the new phone with new features, or one that is slimmer or cooler than the next.

    In America we want a 99c phone. That's why we get hamstrung in these ridiculous 3 year or more service contracts. If you actually spend the same amount of money that Japanese do on phones, you'll quickly find you have very similair or the same phone.

    Seriously, there is no "reason" why they get cool gadgets and we don't. It's not like there's a huge creature in the Pacific that feasts on cargo ships. We just don't want to pay $400 some odd bucks up front. We prefer low monthly installments. /rolls eyes

    This also explains the year-18 month lag in tech. We just wait for it to get cheap. (Which is ironic, because we Americans as a whole try to piss money away faster than we can earn it.)

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    1. Re:I've said it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      so what happens to all these phones every 6 months?

    2. Re:I've said it before... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      The only reason Japan and Japanese have these sweet 500$ cell-phones is because they see it as a perfectly good investment every 6 months to a year.

      That just floored me when I read that in the article. And we're so concerned in the US with how much of this discarded junk is filling the landfills and leeching toxic chemicals. To think of how such a geographically small country like Japan can dispose of all this stuff complete with wasted batteries.... How do they do it?

    3. Re:I've said it before... by DaBestSpooner · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've never seen a $500 cellphone in japan nor have I 've seen a $.99 cellphone in the US. $50 in Japan gets you the equivlent of a $500 cellphone in the US complete with megapixel camera, outlook integration, and fast internet. Heck I just bought $60 cellphone in japan at a convience store, that the equivlent of a motorola V600, too bad I cant use it back in NY.

    4. Re:I've said it before... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1
      It's not like there's a huge creature in the Pacific that feasts on cargo ships.

      Kind of funny that you mention that while discussing Japan...

      Not that we don't invent our own fantasies about the Pacific in that manner.

      --
      Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
    5. Re:I've said it before... by TylerL82 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They ship all their garbage to America, package it, and resell it.

    6. Re:I've said it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's not like there's a huge creature in > the Pacific that feasts on cargo ships. You mean a creature like this one ? http://www.cthulhu.org/

    7. Re:I've said it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slightly off topic...I used to work at RadioShack and we did the 1 cent cell phone thing. Several customers actually thought the phone cost 1 cent!

      "No sir. It's a $300.01 phone. When you sign a contract with the cell phone company, the cell company pays us the other $300."

      Why anyone would believe that you can manufactor a cell phone, sell it for 1 cent, and make a profit on that alone is beyond me!

    8. Re:I've said it before... by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Exactly. As the article mentions America is a Wal-Mart culture. People here want to buy cheap crap that doesn't work very well because they can get it cheaply. Quality, features, and reliability simply aren't as important to most Americans. Hence the reason why $30 DVD players at Wal-Mart sell well despite the fact that a good $100-200 model would have far more features, better build quality, and better picture quality making them a better buy in the long run.

      Americans are also very resistant to change and quite opinionated about it. People actually demand pan and scan films because they chose not to understand why widescreen is better or they stubbornly refuse even after learning how they're being shorted. The attitude is "it's broken because it doesn't immediately conform to my expectations" rather than "I do not understand this fully".

      The rest of the points are equally valid, but by and large America is composed of ignorant people who won't RTFM and see anything new as bad because it would require them to learn something.

    9. Re:I've said it before... by rho · · Score: 1
      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    10. Re:I've said it before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhhh, you're treading on someone's "We're #1 in all things" fantasy here. Have the courtesy to tread lightly, toss in a few more passive pronouns.

  113. Economies of scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By sheer size of population alone, there are far, far more early adopting geeks to sell to in the far east that all speak pretty much the same written language.

    If you come up with a gadget that appeals to 0.0001% of the population, it might be worthwhile to develop/manufacture/market it in the far east than in the west, simply because the 0.0001% corresponds to a far greater number of people.

  114. Japan != Tokyo by sl70 · · Score: 1

    Many posters have said, ``Everything is cooler in Japan.'' This is bullshit. The rural areas of Japan, where about one-third of the people live, are so different from the cites; you'd think it was a third-world country.

    My wife's family, who live about 70 miles north of Tokyo, built a new house a few years ago. The new house has a toilet with a heated seat (necessary because, since there's no central heating nearly anywhere, including in the cities, your butt would freeze to the seat in the winter), a bidet and a fan to dry you after you use the bidet. Before that, all they had was a hole in the floor. The wastes would drop into a tank below the house and every few weeks a guy would come by with the ``vaccuum car'' to suck out the contents. He would sell it farmers who would use it on their fields. Stinky! They now have a flush toilet and a septic system, but most of their neighbors still have the latrine-style toilet.

    My brother-in-law just got DSL at their house this year. Not exactly ``cool.''

    --
    Thank God I'm an atheist!
  115. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Mumpsman · · Score: 1

    Just to clarify, it's raw milk cheese that's been aged less than 60 days that is illegal to sell. That said, the way the law is written, lax enforcement, and general misinformation about what raw milk cheese is (and if Goat cheese counts) means that I can still get the stuff at my local Whole Foods. Also, in the northern states anyway, there is always the option of skipping accross the border to Canadia for some cheese love.

    --
    No battles to the death are recalled. Mumpsman can hit to attack and cause brainsmashing.
  116. The reason is maturity of the technology by twbecker · · Score: 1

    I'd heard somwhere once that a large part of the reason for this is that on average, the Japanese consumer is a lot more tolerant of immature, or not ready for prime time technology. I guess its just for the cool factor. But what it boils down to is that they basically beta test a lot of stuff for us, so that Americans get the quality they demand.

    --
    "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
  117. One word that can debunk this whole mess: by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    iPod.
    They cannot not make the iPod mini fast enough to meet Japanese consumer demand....but the iPod isn't Japanese. Just goes to show that anyone anywhere can create some very interesting gadgets. While it's true that the US has less than Japan, I don't know how many of us need usb aroma therapy....
    The only good thing they really have on us is cellular service, but there are a lot of reasons it's hard to do in the US, and honestly, I'm not entirely confortable with my phone doing a lot more things than being a phone....

  118. Re:Ob. South Park Ref. by tgd · · Score: 1

    Did I just see someone mention hummers and penis in the same post?

    *checks URL*

  119. Only in Tokyo? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    I was an exchange student in Japan in 1994. I stayed with a host family who had a house on the outskirts of Toyama, which is an industrial city with a population of ~300,000 people (about 1/2 the population of Washington DC proper). Rotary phones were still *very* common there - I think that the phone switches were still mechanical and relay-based - and you had to make international calls through the long-distance operator. The toilet in my host family's home was basically a "Turkish toilet" - a hole in the ground with a porcelain basin around it with no water supply for flushing since the stuff went straight down. From other students' stories, my host family wasn't unique.
    Maybe I was just spoiled by growing up in New Jersey, which is one of the more technically advanced areas of the US, but the part of Japan which I was in didn't seem all that advanced.

    -b.

  120. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by tyen · · Score: 1

    Argh. It should be spelled Léon de Lyon.

  121. sponging off parents by elnyka · · Score: 1
    I personally find it disgusting to hear about young adults living off free at their parents' home without contributing to the rent.

    Part of the local culture? Maybe, but it's still disgusting to have lots of disposable cash by sponging off one's parents. Talking about being dysfunctional.

    1. Re:sponging off parents by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Your dysfunction is their norm. A Japanese parent would probably say that you're being wasteful of money living on your own when you *could* live with your parents.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    2. Re:sponging off parents by elnyka · · Score: 1
      It's still dysfunctional in my opinion. No one can appreciate the real pain of making a living by living off free. A parent's duty is to provide her offsprings with a roof, food and a sense of duty, responsibility and direction, never to pamper without question.

      Now that I'm reading this, shit, I'm so off topic!!! LOL. Maybe I'm just jealous cuz these kids have all the cool gadgets while I don't :P

    3. Re:sponging off parents by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Having worked with a lot of Japanese people who lived with their parents for extended periods of time, I can tell you that the typical Japanese is not someone suffering for want of a strong work ethic. You might not be able to picture it working for yourself, but that doesn't mean it doesn't work for them.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  122. Motorcycles, dammit! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    I wish that we in the US got some of the nifty bikes that you see in Japan - namely 250cc 4-stroke 4-cylinder bikes that make 30-40 hp and are pretty light. They'd make good rides in NYC - bigger wheels than scooters, classier and more comfortable than small dirtbikes, and decent gas mileage unlike some of the 1000cc+ behemoths sold in the US nowadays. (Yes, yes, I know - Harleys are status symbols in Japan and Europe, supposedly ...)

    -b.

  123. Where's the beef? by abb3w · · Score: 1
    All this in the name of safety, yet at the same time, you can't get irradiated beef...

    Dunno where you are, but it's here in Virginia. For a while I was getting irradiated hamburger from the local supermarket. It was about 10-20% pricier than regular ground beef, but being able to enjoy a true "rare" burger every now and then it was worth it.

    My usual store stopped carrying it-- the meat manager said it wasn't selling well enough. It was obvious when they put it on sale at a lower price than comparable unirradiated and still didn't sell near as well. There's another chain in town that still carried it last I checked, but since their prices are higher for most of my regular weekly groceries (frozen veggies, pre-cut salad mix, Purina Bachelor Chow, etc), I don't go there very often.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  124. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by rrkap · · Score: 1

    In Europe you're allowed to make and sell things that contain non-pasturized dairy products. In the US, you're not. Apparently americans aren't allowed to determine for themselves what is or isn't an acceptable risk. So the best European young cheeses and chocolates have poor substitutes as their namesakes in the US.

    Not so. Unpasteurized milk and cheeses made from it are widely available at high end and natural grocery stores. You might have trouble finding such things in Des Moines, but in any real city you shouldn't have a hard time finding either the original european product or a close substitute of American orgin. There are also a bunch of crappy equivalents of the these products, but you can get the good ones if you look

    To make matters worse, they've convinced people here that "ultra-pasturized" means "better", even though it just means they used extra high temperatures to get it done more quickly and save money at the expense of flavor. That means the milk here doesn't taste nearly as good as it could under the current regulations.

    Again, you are spreading misinformation. The only thing that I see routinely ultrapasteurized is heavy cream. And the reason for doing that is to extend the shelf life, not to reduce costs. I don't often see ultra-pasteurized milk in stores because the normally pasteurized stuff is cheaper.

    All this in the name of safety, yet at the same time, you can't get irradiated beef...

    On this one, you are correct. There is an irrational fear of food irradiation (I miss irradiated milk, which was better than ultra pasteurized milk if you're going to buy milk that doesn't need refrigeration until its open).

    --
    I like my beverages with warning labels!
  125. cultural differences by memph1st0 · · Score: 1

    reading through this thread i notice people constantly noting our 'cultural differences' with japan as the cause for our lack in gadgetry. when you think of japan, yes, you think of a 'culture.' they are a defined nation who live a certain way. now think of european cultures, the french, the german, etc, once again they are all defined. now think of american culture. can you think of anything positive in it? we lack a culture, because this country is simply too mixed, and too large, to have any kind of definition.

    i'm sure we have a large population of gadget and fashion obsessed individuals who wish to express themselves by how they look and what they carry, i'm one of them. but there's too many bush lovin' country rednecks out there too.

    i'm starting to forget the point i was trying to make, but it's somewhere along the lines of... there's too many people in this country with varying cultures themselves, spread out in this vast land, for there to be enough demand to market a product to this entire huge ass country. it simply not not needed for america as a whole, like it or not.

    1. Re:cultural differences by VilePSU2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point, up until you said "redneck." That's a racial slur. -1 for racism.

  126. I think the article is incomplete and one sided. by xotx69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not trolling, but the guy should stick to writing guides to Cinemas or whatever.

    While I'm sure most of his information is sound, he forgot a very important piece of information. The development of better tech toys over there is due to the fact that after the surrender of Japan to US (or Allies..whatever), Japan was restricted to domestic/consumer products. Any military development was frowned upon/stopped due to the fact the US was now stationed there.

    An example was after the invention of the Transistor by Bratten/Shockly/Bardeen (sp?), 2 electrical engineers running a radio store took that concept and made ICs to make radios and started what is now called Sony.

    So you see, Japan was forced to emphasize domestic consumer goods by the US since developing anything related to Military was a no-no. Thus the head start on everyone else, and why North America is always a couple of years behind in certain aspects of the tech toys.

  127. Maybe they just filer the crap out? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of "new" gadgets that suck and never make it to the US. Maybe Japan just filters out the crap gadgets. Also I believe the US is more finicky about technology. It's not so much of consumers buying things to be on the cutting edge, but more of consumers wanting what everyone else wants.

    And let's just face it. The american culture is not really into technology. Text messaging is on all phones, but it's not very popular compared to other countries. People would rather use a cell phone as a mobile version of a land line phone.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Maybe they just filer the crap out? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Text messaging is on all phones, but it's not very popular compared to other countries.
      It seems very popular here with the <20 crowd.

      People would rather use a cell phone as a mobile version of a land line phone.
      Wow, people wanting to use their phone as a phone. Who'd have thought?

      The american culture is not really into technology.
      You mean the country that brought you the personal computer? Or the country that took man to the moon and explored the surface of mars?

      Though I do like the idea that Japan is the liver of the U.S. Filtering out crap we don't want or need.

  128. I thought home size had something to do with it by sielwolf · · Score: 1

    Because of the population density in Japan is significantly higher in the US there is less room for stuff... and for stuff that you use with more room.

    So you wouldn't have a huge market for 52" projection screen televisions and full living room furniture sets because no Japanese household would find that to be an efficient use of (their limited amount of) space. So they prefer technological solutions: small, miniturized things that can be easily packed away into the corner. This also goes towards the Japanese interior design aesthetic which is for clean minimalism (where rooms are indistinguishible/modular and everything is cleverly hidden in wall/floor storage to be broken out at need).

    How much stuff does an American suburban household have that a condo/apartment dweller wouldn't need? A lawnmower, weedtrimmer. And then the luxury items: BBQs, pool tables, swimming pools, decks, boats, RVs, ATVs. Even in dense American suburbs these are common. Your McMansion. There is space and an inclination to be out in it.

    For this reason the Japanese are very interested in high tech and Americans less so. Koreans, Taiwanese and Europeans somewhere in the middle.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:I thought home size had something to do with it by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      BBQs are NOT luxury items! Why, without my BBQ, I would starve to death BBQs are a necessity. And I live in a McCondo.

      --
      Nice Marmot
  129. Test marketing? by fergj · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the reason is that these technotoys are being test marketed in the home territory before the survivors are inflicetd on the rest of creation. I lived for many years in a US city that was well-known as a place to test the market for middle America consumer products. Some were hits, many were misses and never showed up in the mainstream of consumer products; they just quietly folded their tents.

  130. Quality tolerance by gammoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was born and raised in California. When I was a young adult, I moved overseas for 10 years. When I returned about 6 years ago, one of the first things to strike me was Americans' tolerance for mediocrity, both in products and services. Just as long as they can get a ton of stuff that work good enough without having to read the manual.

    That tolerance, coupled with a pervasive belief that America has the best of everything, from political systems to health care to consumer products (many Americans hate it when I give counter examples--really rocks their world view), suggests a fertile ground for technological stagnation.

    Tell me to piss off if you like. I couldn't give a toss.

    1. Re:Quality tolerance by ivano · · Score: 1
      I'm far more interested in hearing your experiences - since a lot of us agree with you.

      ciao

  131. Sex, technology, fetishization by shonagon53 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a cliché and I can't refrain from posting it: the japanese obsession with technological gadgetry even pervades their sexuality. Not that their sexlives are technologized, but they're "fetishized". The fetish is in sexuality, what a gadget is in economic behavior.

    Now ask any h**ker who's ever worked in Japan, and she'll tell you that the Japanese are into things such as sniffing feet, touching zippers, cutting toenails and making origami from panties. Everything is fragmented, the person is reduced to an assemblage of sexual gadgets.

    There must be something very deeply anthropological about this fetishization of ordinary life. You can't explain Japan's gizmobsession simply by referring to demographics, social space-time factors or other such sociological schemes. There must be something deeply ritualistic in all this, stemming from the traditional mind of the Japanese.

    Ah well, maybe it's too much of a cliché and maybe it says more about our Eurocentric obsession with the East. We will never really know.

  132. That's a good thing. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    If I remember correctly, that paid off the last time Japan attacked us. We ended up overcoming our adversaries and helping out our European allies who were naive enough to think that after WW1, the world was a more modern, civilized place where warfare was a thing of the past.

    1. Re:That's a good thing. by stor · · Score: 1

      You should learn about WWII before shooting your mouth off. You think the allies won because of "better guns"?

      There was a lot more to it than that, man. Strategy, luck and countless thousands of men all played a part in winning WW2.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  133. Nintendo DS, in the US before Japan by jamus · · Score: 1

    It's not true that Japan always gets the toys first...The Nintendo DS was released in the US before Japan. They did this so they can catch the US's Thanksgiving buying rush for Christmas. They released it in Japan on Dec. 02.

    My personal theory on the tech deficit: Americans are cheap, and Japanese have more disposable income, because owning a home is nearly impossible versus renting. I have no numbers to back that up, though. :)

    BTW, if you want to see how commercial Christmas can become, visit Japan in December. You can't avoid the Christmas lights, music, and sales, even though the population is less than 1% Christian.

  134. "gadgets" == uncool nerd geek gizmo widgets by madrivertech.com · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because the Japanese think of these innovations as means of making their lives more powerful while we dismissfully label this things with geek-ghetto terms as "gadgets," "gizmos," or "widgets," which suggest novelty and bling-bling value but not necessarily usefulness.

    Cf. OED: gadget -- "c. transf. and gen. An accessory or adjunct; a knick-knack or gewgaw."

    I know. I know. They call you geeks and nerds with your gadgets as a term of *affection*.
    I'll wave to you with my giant foam hand on geek pride day!

  135. It's not about consumer electronics by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of innovations that are simply "good ideas", and are not based on consumer gadgets but mysteriously cannot be found anywhere else than Japan.

    Examples:

    Mugtop coffee filters
    Carry handles for plastic bags
    Vending machines with hot and cold drinks
    2D barcodes (see QR Codes)
    Replica plastic food for restaurant displays (think about it ... )
    Electronic/RF restaurant menus for staff
    ATMs that can accept coins and cash
    A fast and efficient rail network
    Computer-generated traffic relay displays at highway service stations

    I can continue, but the point is that these are not technological innovations. They are about the innovative use of existing technology. The US and Europe are not very good at the latter and even worse at the former!

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:It's not about consumer electronics by praxis · · Score: 1

      Let me remove some of the mystery and point out items that can be found outside of Japan easily. I am not addressing some points because you might be right that they are Japan-only as far as I can tell, but I don't know everything so someone else might like to point out the ones I missed.

      Mugtop coffee filters
      - Check out the Melitta One Cup Coffee maker, fits on top of most any cup
      - Bodum makes a one cup travel French Press

      Vending machines with hot and cold drinks
      - In the UK they have the KLIX 450 hot and cold drink vending machine

      2D barcodes (see QR Codes)
      - Many shipping companies all over the world use 2-D matrix codes

      Replica plastic food for restaurant displays (think about it ... )
      - Many companies around the world make plastic food, like Fax Foods, Inc in California. I have not seen much of it used in restaurants where I've been, but it might be a socialogical reason rather than the "good idea" not being available.

      A fast and efficient rail network
      - France, Switzerland, Germany, many other places

    2. Re:It's not about consumer electronics by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

      Bodum makes a one cup travel French Press
      They don't come in packs of 20 sold at the supermarket - they're overpriced luxury items.

      In the UK they have the KLIX 450 hot and cold drink vending machine
      Euugh. Do you know how often those powder/water mix nozzles are cleaned? Never ever drink from those whatever country they're in.

      Many shipping companies all over the world use 2-D matrix codes
      Many department stores and convenience stores use them in Japan. They're not a specialised codeset unlike everywhere else.

      France, Switzerland, Germany, many other places
      The network in France doesn't compare. Germany's is better. Basically, if you have four choices - local, rapid, express or bullet train for a destination less than 20km away then it would come close. I sense you've never travelled on the train network in Japan though.

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
  136. The article contrasts Japanese with Amish? . by neura · · Score: 1

    Out of all of the posts in this thread, of course I don't think most of them have read the article (par for the course). If they did, someone would have posted about the simple fact that they are comparing technically savvy Japanese with THE AMISH!

    The people they're using for comparison in the USA specifically do not WANT technology... just pathetic journalism. Then there is the admission that "yes, we know this is extreme and inaccurate" (paraphrased). How can you represent the entire US by using the Amish as an example. *sigh*

  137. They are armed by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  138. Mod Up, parent is insightful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I had mod points. This is on the mark. Needs to be modded up.

  139. Just what we need, more debt... by rbird76 · · Score: 1

    The US has huge debts, both personal and governmental (the government's debts can be divided into what we've already spent and what we have promised to spend). People regularly spend money they don't have (credit cards) or money they are counting on as investments (home equity) on God knows what. So now we're supposed to spend even more so that we can get nice shiny gadgets that are bleeding edge now and will be dull as a pebble in six months? That feeling of "look, I'm so cool." is somewhat more transient than the "joy" of sitting on a sewer grate watching the US and world economies dissolve in a rain of debt.

    If buying new gadgets doesn't add more debt, then money is coming from somewhere - the gadget we "should" be getting would be displacing whatever we're spending our money on now. No net gain there.

    Bankrupting yourself (or the nation) seems like an awfully high price to pay to get cool new gadgets.

    1. Re:Just what we need, more debt... by zx75 · · Score: 1

      And yet, the US seems to be doing an admirable job at just that *despite* the original article's premise that the US lags behind in getting access to the latest and greatest.

      Must be all the weaponry...

      --
      This is not a sig.
  140. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by jsebrech · · Score: 1

    I've been to Europe a couple of times on vacation and the most dissappointing thing was the food. I always, -always- heard about how good the food is in Europe.

    "Europe" is too amorphous. I can't argue with you, because there are indeed regions in europe where the food is bad. I'll have to hope for the best that you're not one of these people who've visited britain and then think they know what european food is like.

    All I know is ... when I went to NY and my NY friend took me to restaurants she said had great food, I thought it was only average.

    For the best food in europe I would have to advise france, and in second place, italy.

  141. Three months ago... by peteMG · · Score: 1

    .. I went to Japan for 10 days with my girlfriend, and spent 8 of them in Tokyo. Sure, I saw plenty of gadgets, went to Akihabara, the camera stores, looked at all the cellphones that folks were using on the JR.. and overall wasn't that impressed. Two things stood out for me. First, it seemed like nearly all the cell phones I saw were quite similar to each other, and were on the whole larger than I'd prefer; they've all been optimized for text messaging. I looked through nearly a dozen different small phone shops, and it seemed like they all carried the same thing.

    Second, I didn't see anything that I haven't seen from here via the web. I figured that if a company has the resources to design and build a lustworthy gadget, they're more than likely going to have the budget to market it internationally. If not, we're going to see it soon enough online (http://www.google.com/search?q=japanese+gadget+ne ws), and there are plenty of ways to get it over the ocean.

    So: I didn't see much there that had me instantly smitten, and what little I did, I've seen before.

    (Though I will say that the deep-dark-akihabara-maze-of-wires-and-connectors-a nd-chips-and-various-low-level-gadgetry was, indeed, quite cool and unlike anything I've ever seen here in the bay area)

  142. Don't forget about state taxes by ink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Europe and Japan have had state-run telephone companies that charge ridiculous rates for land lines. With wireless came competition and cheaper phone service; which of course brought investment for differentiation. Contrast this with the US, where one can call local numbers for "free" with basic service (from 15-30 dollars a month). Our local coverage here extends about 90 miles in all directions. I do own a cell phone, but I get the cheapest service because it's simply a portable phone for me, and not a replacement for my Qwest line (which is also my DSL).

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    1. Re:Don't forget about state taxes by Conor+Turton · · Score: 1
      Contrast this with the US, where one can call local numbers for "free" with basic service (from 15-30 dollars a month)

      Sounds very much like British Telecoms Option 1 to me......

      --
      Conor "You're not married,you haven't got a girlfriend and you've never seen Star Trek? Good Lord!" - Patrick Stewart
    2. Re:Don't forget about state taxes by ink · · Score: 1
      Interesting; their web page doesn't sound like it at all:

      Call anywhere in the UK for up to an hour for just 5.5p during Evenings and Weekends. You'll also enjoy daytime calls in the UK at just 3p a minute.

      BT Options

      And, yes, that really is a good deal compared to how much it cost 5 years ago (unless you have a modem and want to stay online for more than an hour); but still more expensive than the US land lines. Wireless service in the UK is better for it.

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  143. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Not so. Unpasteurized milk and cheeses made from it are widely available at...

    Look at those cheeses again. Are they aged? Read my comment again. Also, just because a young, soft cheese doesn't say it was made with pasturized milk on the package doesn't mean it wasn't.

    Again, you are spreading misinformation. The only thing that I see routinely ultrapasteurized is heavy cream. And the reason for doing that is to extend the shelf life, not to reduce costs. I don't often see ultra-pasteurized milk in stores because the normally pasteurized stuff is cheaper.


    I was just at the grocery store last night. (Roche Bros. in Acton MA if anybody cares) All of the milk, even the organic milk was ultra-pasturized. I'm willing to accept that things may be different where you are, but around here the dairys seem to choose the method that only takes a few seconds rather than many minutes.

  144. Pr0n by WebBORG · · Score: 0

    Hey, at least we have uncensored Pr0n. Woohoo, Go USA!

  145. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by CK2004PA · · Score: 1

    WOW. I do believe that Europeans have better chocolate. No doubt! Milk is subjective, I prefer that cremier style you speak of, not everyone does. But to compare overall food quality and taste as being better in Europe ! My god what a farce! Also, Americans can't decide what an acceptable risk is , compared to Europeans? WOW that's a good one! Did you ever hear of Socialism ? Yeah....his post get +5 Insightful ?

    --
    "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  146. I'll give you one reason why this is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans value bargains and deals over quality.

    So what, you don't need to eat all that food but I can buy a mountain of food for $7 at hometown buffet whereas a nice meal at a good resturant buys me a small plate of excellent taste.

    The American picks the quantity over the quality, because we feel good about the deal we just got. And thats also why we're so supersized and fat. Its all about value. In Japan it's quite the opposite.

  147. Keep the Power Local by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not think we need more federal control over local issues. I just think that putting federal control over everything does not fix all of our problems.

  148. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Also, Americans can't decide what an acceptable risk is , compared to Europeans? WOW that's a good one! Did you ever hear of Socialism ? Yeah....his post get +5 Insightful ?

    Apparently the moderators can distinguish between facetious commentary and serious commentary.

    It's funny, Laugh.

  149. Toilet myths by sakusha · · Score: 1, Informative

    The "smart toilet" stories about Japan are mostly a myth. Yeah, they exist, for about .000001% of the population that owns one.
    When I lived in Japan, I was astonished to discover how primitive most toilet facilities are. I read an official government survey that said that about 40% of Japanese homes have NO hookup to a sanitary sewer, they don't have septic tanks either, they have "honey wagons" that come and suck out the shit from a holding tank once a month. An average home's toilet is more likely to be a "flapper," than a smart toilet. A flapper is not much more than an outhouse with a ceramic toilet on top, with a little flap on a spring that flaps shut once you take a dump down the hole into the holding tank. I lived in a house with a flapper, I had to take a bucket of water from the bathtub and dump it down the hole in order to flush. And let's not even get into the squat toilets..
    Japan's infrastructure, even the sewer systems, look like a third world country. Sure, Japan has a few high-tech infrastructures like telecom, but that's only because of the power of monopolies like NTT to mandate a whole new infrastructure in one sweeping movement. More basic infrastructures, like sewerage, goes neglected, because nobody can make huge profits off it.

    1. Re:Toilet myths by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Except the guys driving the honey wagons who are bribing the politicians not to improve the situation...

  150. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For the best food in europe I would have to advise france, and in second place, italy.

    Most Americans are used to a more multi-cultural society than they have in Europe, and while of course one expects to eat French food in France, the idea of eating nothing but French food is distinctly odd. When I'm in France I'll have to eat at the Arab dives or the terrible Vietnamese restaurants now and then, I'm just not used to limiting myself to one style.

  151. Japanese still lacking a first world mentality by firestarter · · Score: 1

    Japan is a fantastic, rich, first world country to visit (I've been there a few times), but I don't believe the Japanese see it that way.

    Japanese people still have the remenants of their 1960s attitude that they MUST CATCH UP AT ALL COSTS. New is good and flashy technology is great. This is an attitude you find all over East Asia, since before the 1950s these countries were all seriously behind the west.

    The US and Europe on the other hand have more of an old-world arrogance, and nothing to prove about their technology or 'modernness'. Conversely, there are many in the west who have a much more conservative approach. Our 1960s love of the new has been replaced with suspicion, and a desire for retro and traditional goods.

    I love Japan and don't intent to criticise their approach and attitude, but I really think they should get over their need to modernise. They're seriously destroying their country by paving over mountains, covering their coastline with concrete defenses and lining all their rivers.

    If you want to read a much better account of this, check out 'Dogs and Demons' by Alex Kerr:

    http://www.davidappleyard.com/japan/jp13.htm

  152. Raw beef hamburger? Simple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a quality steak, give it to the butcher and tell him to grind / mince it. Take home, make patty, cook and eat it.

    Ground beef is nasty stuff. You wouldn't want to see the room where ground beef is produced.

  153. Tripple Deficit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that make your deficit tripple?

  154. Re:Hrmm by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I will beg to differ with that assesment. The federal government should staying the hell away from standardizing anything when it comes to primary schools. Why many school districts are hacing issues now are because 80%+ of their budgets are strangled by federal and/or state mandates. If most of the funding comes from locally collected taxes, there should be some kind of basic standards in math, reading, and writing for each grade level nationally, then let the local community figure out how to best go about the tasks.


    Not saying that all those on school boards should be, as with any elected office, but the fact that these are typically locally elected members means that the community can still kick them out if they do a bad job. Ever try to fire anyone in the Federal Government? Or better yet, has any burocrat ever listened to you? Federalize the system and the very same people that control policy now, aka the lobby groups with money, will control the schools as well. Is that really what you want? One lobby gets powerful enough and poof, evolution is gone from the biology books. Probably a bad example, but...


    My gradfather served on his local school board just after consolodation from one room country schools to larger districts. He was a farmer, but they fired bad people and did the best that they could. Many of that generation, like my parents, were the first in the family to attend college. What made school boards, and many other organizations back then, more effective was that people in the community gave a damn about the community. They didn't run for school board to hold an office, they did so because of a genuine desire to make sure their kids and others' kids got the best education that was possible with the resources.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  155. It's illegal, that's why by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...rent CDs and buy blank MD discs to record them on (now THAT would never go over in the US).

    It would work in a heartbeat, if it weren't a violation of copyright laws, written by and for the recording industry. Ever wonder why you can't rent a CD here in the States?

    http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html#109

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:It's illegal, that's why by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      That was my point. My capitalized THAT was supposed to convey your message.

  156. gomi no sensi by splatterboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So much great tech gets thrown into the garbage in Japan they have a name for the people who seek out the trash - Master of garbage. Gomi no sensi is a Japanese term for people who "find" great working stuff in the garbage. People in Japan will buy a new tv simply because their tv is 1 or 2 years old. Novelty (new) means something different there, it's closer to "original" than "trendy". It drives the culture and the economy - newer = better. Very far from the cliché of the Japanese as "copycats". I've lived there and I recommend it highly.

    In America people say "if it aint broke don't fix it". That attitude is why "early adopter" (ie: trendy bastard, yuppy scum, geek) has a borderline negative connotation here.

    We have an agricultural attitude here about almost everything - "built to last". As a culture, most Americans yearn for a fictional "leave it to beaver" past and will not buy a new anything until the old one is dead. Most Americans are simply more conservative than they/you think they are. Look at how most Americans choose whom to vote for for president. (I'm a New Yorker, I'll skip that one for now...) Something most slashdotters forget - you are not typical Americans.

    I am not saying its perfect in Japan and bad in America, far from it. But I will say travel anywhere, anytime you can, broaden your mind. Its all good.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    1. Re:gomi no sensi by TiggsPanther · · Score: 1
      In America people say "if it aint broke don't fix it". That attitude is why "early adopter" (ie: trendy bastard, yuppy scum, geek) has a borderline negative connotation here.

      In some parts of the UK (and America too, I'd guess) that carries a corollary...
      "And if it is broke, fix it." There are people around who insist on trying to repair something to extend its lifespan instead of buying a replacement model because of the price of the initial outlay.

      I think the US and UK have a situation where less customers are willing to take a risk, and as such less companies are willing to do so. After all a company would have to be mad to release an expensive internet-connected refridgerator when most people just want something to keep the beer and milk cool.

      --
      Tiggs
      "120 chars should be enough for everyone..."
  157. "compounding" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good financial education would have taught you about the "magic" of compounding and the time-value of money.

    You might start here (http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:yZvteZoGfrAJ :www.free-financial-advice.net/compounding-effect. html+compounding+financial&hl=en&lr=lang_e n) for an initial primer -- PLEASE!!!! (because I don't want you to be one more person whose children I have to put through college and retirement I have to pay for due to your lack of understanding why effective saving means saving early and saving often!!!!!!!!!!!)

    1. Re:"compounding" by dykofone · · Score: 1
      I've had a good deal of "financial education," and realized that most of it is crap. Sure, compounding interest kicks ass at the 20% rates they always spout out, but that's bullshit. If you're trying to save summer-job type money, the most easily accesible savings program you have is with the bank. I tried a savings account when I was in high school, and realized 1.5% doesn't really compound well....

      My big point was that while you're making sub $1500 a summer during high school, there's not really any point saving it. Enjoy that money.

      I've been doing engineering co-ops in college now, and am finally seeing enough money that I can have fun and also see reasonable returns on savings. I also have made enough to get into stocks, and can really start to see some return (I setup for diverse, long term stocks. None of this day trading crap). My point was that $1000 at 5% (good luck finding a mutual fund with that rate with only $1000) is still only going to keep up with inflation, and by the time you're making enough money to really start saving, that $1000 isn't quite the same anymore.

  158. Re:Tech Deficit? Our houses are bigger than theres by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
    The average American McMansion has around 2500 sq feet and practically an acre of land.
    And said McMansion is usually located way out in the middle of nowhere on former farmland. It takes 10 or 20 min. of driving just to get to the nearest decent grocery store, and 1/2 hour to an hour each way to work. For the same price, I'd take a 2 bedroom apartment in a city or a smaller house in a medium-sized university town where there are interesting things to do within walking distance and the locale is designed for humans, not cars.

    -b.

  159. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course that's psychological.

  160. Could it be as simple as... by khelms · · Score: 1

    a higher engineer to lawyer ratio?

  161. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by miu · · Score: 1
    3. Service. We met some friends who had a (well-behaved) 2 year old. The restaurant would not even take our order.

    Sorry to offend, but good for them.

    The inconsiderate 95% portion of the population have ruined it for those few good parents who can control their little monsters.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  162. Except that you can go to most any... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...public library in the US and 'rent' a CD of Music, not always the latest release mind you, as well as a number of Video Cassettes, DVDs and other media formats. Not to many people know that many modern libraries have all sorts of media available for 'rental'.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  163. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by rrkap · · Score: 1

    Look at those cheeses again. Are they aged? Read my comment again. Also, just because a young, soft cheese doesn't say it was made with pasturized milk on the package doesn't mean it wasn't.

    I could have a bit of a bias because I live in a bit of California (Santa Cruz, which is about an hour south of San Francisco for those unfamiliar with California geography) where the artisnal foods movement is big. I can think of a couple of places where I can get cheese made with raw milk (a fact that they advertize). This is also the case with milk. California has different requirements for milk sold in the state than the rest of the U.S. so ultra pasteurized milk is rare here (of course, milk fortified with additional milk solids to meet state protein requirements is common, so there's a good and a bad). But, at least in some parts of the US, you can get raw milk. My big gripe is that ever since Odwalla sold a bad batch of orange juice and started pasteurizing its juices, it's been harder to get unpasteurized orange juice around here.

    --
    I like my beverages with warning labels!
  164. What if Japanese are Behind? by dorpus · · Score: 1

    DVD videos are still mostly unheard of in Japan -- their video stores stock VHS movies.

  165. Sure. Whatever. by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    If that's important to you.

    (Harvey pats IdleTime on his wittle head)

    Now run along an play, son.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  166. Slashdot: Home Of The Bad Analogy by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    Poor analogy. You're comparing a quantum leap in technology to incremental feature creep and nonsensical concepts about the intrinsic coolness of a product.

    The former is a historical event. The latter is corporate hoohah.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  167. where do they go? by pjbusby · · Score: 1

    The Japanese culture encourages a lot of consumerism and wastefulness: where do all those obsolete cellphones and other electronics go? The expiration of the product is not important. The money spent on cell phones goes right back into the technology industry. You can export electronics; you can't export suburbs.

    1. Re:where do they go? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? I'm asking where the obsolete electronics go. Most probably, they go to the landfill, where the toxic materials in them leech into the water supply. You don't think disposal is an important problem?

      This has nothing to do with exporting.

  168. American Roads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is THE reason I live in Arizona.

    "Welcome to California" == "Slam on your brakes"

  169. Re:First things (Wicked OT) by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    ABC needs to fire their Monday Night Football sound effects guy (effects volume crushes the commentators), and quit with the damned animations. No wonder we have a nation of ADD afflicted freaks.

  170. Well, you're very wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I recall the U.S. invented virtually all the technology in your cool gadgets (yes, even cellular technology), we invented personal computers, and the internet.

    And you're bragging about SMS?

    I'd laugh at you, but you're not worth the effort.

  171. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  172. Different family structures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Vancouver with a high asian population, I work with many students from the university and I have found that both asian and indian students tend to live at home. The social norm is that you live at home till you are married and only then do you move out into your own home. I think even then it is socially acceptable for you to live with your parents. So these students are living cheaper but are expected to participate with family stuff. They cook, they clean, they have family obligations that they work very hard to maintain. The white north american kids that I know if they live at home aren't as integrated with the family and more strongly value independence. They seem to want it both ways, they want the cheapness of living at home but maintain their independence as well. There are costs and benifits to both.

  173. Just means you need a better car. by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I did the city thing for a while but eventually the noise just drove me nuts. Yeah, walking around outside to get to bars is nice in your twenties. But, now that I'm old, I prefer to putter around in back yard than I do to go out. For commuting to work, I have a 2004 Pontiac GTO and take twisty back roads. Believe me, I don't mind the drive at all!

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Just means you need a better car. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I did the city thing for a while but eventually the noise just drove me nuts.
      There are plenty of small towns and town-like suburbs (like, say, Morristown, NJ) that you can live in if you're willing to settle for 1/4 acre and 3 bedrooms instead of an acre and 5 bedrooms. They're not necessarily noisy or annoying to live in. For that matter, cities aren't that bad either, if you know where to get your house. A few years ago, a friend paid $200,000 for a house in the Southeast part of DC around 15 blocks from the Capitol. Quiet, relatively safe street, convenient to everywhere (within two blocks of a metro), full driveway, and a modest backyard (about 30' x 35'). The best part about the whole deal is that the house has gone up 2x in value since then - a 100% return on investment in 3 years isn't bad ;)

      -b.

    2. Re:Just means you need a better car. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      For commuting to work, I have a 2004 Pontiac GTO and take twisty back roads. Believe me, I don't mind the drive at all!
      Nice car, and it's a shame that for some reason, they're not selling too well in this country. I've tried the "having a fun vehicle" thing - I've had, at different times, several motorcycles, a Fiat convertible, and a SAAB 900 turbo - _having_ to drive for lengthy periods of time still sucks no matter what how nice the car is. Cars are best for road trips and weekend drives for fun. Commuting is best done on foot, by bicycle, or by transit. Just my opinion, of course.

      -b.

    3. Re:Just means you need a better car. by tjstork · · Score: 1

      See I lived in downtown Philly. Center City. And before that, I lived in Cleveland. I grew up in the burbs in tract housing, and I live in a townhouse now. So I'm -due- for the stix. By stix, I mean, I want to go outside and see the stars at night.

      --
      This is my sig.
  174. Someone set him up the bomb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take off your pants for great justice

  175. Re:The Amish don't have urine sugar sensing toilet by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The Amish don't really need sugar sensing toilets because their diets are not composed of unhealthy over processed junk foods.

  176. Article Summary in 2 words by Dracos · · Score: 1

    FCC Regulations.

  177. hmmm I dunno by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I've never heard anyone use that phrase to describe public school teachers, honestly. I always hear about what a sacrifice they're making for the good of the children, how underpaid and undervalued they are, and what dedicated individuals they are.

    I think that society has a pretty good view of teachers.
    It's all the bureaucracy and moron *parents* that are screwing everything up.

  178. Really? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    I lived in Yokohama for 6 years and never saw anything like you've described. Even going all the way out to the Sado islands, I never had any problems finding a normal toilet.

    The holes in the ground, sure, but even they flushed.

    Where were you where "smart toilets" were a myth? They were *everywhere* when I was there.

    1. Re:Really? by sakusha · · Score: 1

      Washlets aren't smart toilets, that's a whole different thing. Smart toilets with sensors etc. are a relatively recent invention, and are still pretty rare.

      Most metropolitan areas have sewer hookups, and if you go to touristy places like hotels, they have "normal" plumbing even on remote locations like Sado. But most suburban and rural private homes have tanks that have to be emptied by the honey wagon. And there's no real way for you to tell, unless you followed the pipes down to the tank, lots of these homes' toilets look perfectly normal, they just hook to a holding tank instead of a sewer pipe.
      I just happened to live in a horror-house that was obviously hooked to a tank, so I noticed it immediately and did some research. The owner was so cheap, they had a flapper toilet that wasn't even hooked up to water, most residents didn't even tote water to flush, they just used some disgusting sticks sitting in a can near the toilet, to prod the stuff past the flap. Eeww..

  179. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by Nrlll9 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the best food is found in Asia. (even western cuisine)

  180. Slashdot, truth by consensus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You are so wrong it's not even funny.

    The Japanese save more money and spend less than Americans. They may seem to buy more crap, but they actually save more money.

    http://www.columbia.edu/cu/sipa/PUBS/SLANT/FALL9 7/ article1.html

    Only 15 percent of Japanese families own computers, for instance. In the United States, this figure stands at 40 percent. Likewise, appliances such as modern laundry machines, clothes dryers, dishwashers, and ovens are largely unknown.

    Since World War II, the Japanese have resisted the consumerism that engulfs Americans, and Japanese households have enjoyed some of the highest savings rates in the world. But this is changing. In 1984, the average savings rate for Japanese households was nearly 20 percent. America's rate for the same year was only eight percent. Within only ten years, however, both Japanese and American savings rates had dropped. By 1994, Japan's fell to 14 percent while the American rate plunged to four. During the same period, savings rates in countries such as Great Britain, France, Canada, and Germany either remained stable or increased. By American standards, the Japanese savings rate is still high. But Japan remains one of the few countries mirroring America's downward slide in savings rates. The Japanese are clearly buying more than they used to.


    Thanks alot slashdot moderators, you make slashdot suck.

  181. The reason is obvious by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Japan and the USA are the world's two remaining super powers.

    Japan concentrates on making the world's best consumer goods. America concentrates on making the world's best military goods.

    When you want to entertain people and improve their lives, buy Japanese things.

    If you want to kill people, buy American things.

    As a result of truly horrible and brutal war, the Americans decided to include the Japanese in their sphere of protection. In return the Japanese agreed not to fuck with people anymore.
    It has been a good working arrangement for the past fifty years.

    But the Americans now spend far too much on military goods and they have lost their ability to make innovative and popular consumer goods. Americans are always looking for someone to fuck with, because their military-based economy demands it. They have structured their economy so that they simply can't go more than ten years without a major war. They don't really have any choice anymore. They have to go out and fuck with someone, anyone, anywhere, for any reason.
    The only way to deal with the situation is to do whatever you can to convince the Americans to destoy your enemies and leave you and your customers alone.
    Fortunately for the Japanese, the Americans have started a major war with the Arabs, many of whom have been infected with a brain-rotting virus called Islam. Since there are so many of them, the Americans will be occupied with this war for MANY years into the future. This war will continue until they run out of money (and since they have 20000 atomic bombs, your money is their money), run out of expendable people to fight the war, or just get worn out until they leave and the last helicopter is thrown off the side of the last aircraft carrier. Which is how the Vietnam War ended and is how the current Islam war will likely end about ten years from now.
    Although no one will actually come out and say so, most countries are glad that the Americans decided on Islam as the 'enemy du jour'. As a result of their brain-rotting disease, no one can trust the Arabs not to send their children out to blow up their shopping malls and day-care centers. They are happy to have the Americans deal with the situation.
    They can concentrate on making world-class consumer goods without distraction. It's a good situation for everyone except for the American weekend-warrior National Guard who find themselves in situation they can't get out of, can't understand, and can't believe is actually happening to them. Well, they signed up for it and then re-elected the guy who sent them there. It has to be what they really want.
    Better them than us.

  182. How do they come up with this stuff?! by themuffinking · · Score: 1

    "Japan's trade surplus with the United States remains astronomically high, at over $6 billion; yet any regular reader of technophile Web sites such as I4U, Engadget or Gizmodo knows that the world's biggest exporter of consumer electronics regularly keeps its most innovative and exciting widgetry to itself, selling it only to the domestic market. Cell phones that do everything but make toast (although appropriate attachments are probably available from third-party accessory vendors). Gigapixel digital cameras . Laptops so tiny that "My dog ate my homework" is once again a valid excuse. And, of course, the most incredible toilets in the history of humankind."

  183. its about size by jonwil · · Score: 1

    One factor is the american obsession with BIG.
    BIG cars most notably.
    But also BIG TVs and such.

  184. I Would drink Erdinger every day if I could.. mmmm by argan0n · · Score: 1

    But not so much around my parts.
    Oddly enough, the "Japanese" sushi bar across the street is the only place in town that serves it -- go figure.

    --
    argan0n
  185. Not true by complexmath · · Score: 1

    MD players may have sold for $400 at the outset, but the price quickly dropped to $200 or less. And player/recorders were available both in stereo-sized versions and in pocket-sized versions. Also, blanks were (and are) readily available.

    The problem with MiniDiscs was timing. They were just starting to gain momentum in the US when MP3s exploded in popularity. If the option is a MiniDisc players with 74-minute discs (MDs store 74 minutes of audio in compressed format, so they're comparable to CDs but with the quality of good MP3s) or an MP3 player, most people opted for an MP3 player (I'll speculate on why later). And this was despite the fact that all this happened before the iPod was released and average MP3 player storage was around 128MB.

    Personally, I like MiniDiscs. Tracks can be named, rearranged, and deleted. Discs only store 74 minutes of audio but they're tiny, which made them a better choice than CD walkmen or even solid-state MP3 players if you're willing to carry around extra discs. And being able to record in digital format cheaply and portably (compared to a DAT walkman--I still haven't seen a pocket-sized MP3 recorder) is a great feature, provided you are willing to live with the 74 minute limit.

    What may have really killed MiniDisc was Napster. Unlike Japan, CDs can't be rented in the US, but Napster was easy to use, similarly free, and had everything you'd ever want. And why bother trying to figure out how to convert MP3's to audio to write to a MiniDisc when you can buy an MP3 walkman? Sure they couldn't store as much as a pocketfull of MiniDiscs, but there aren't many folks out there willing to go through the machniations of data conversion just to use a specific device. And now with iPods and similar devices selling fairly cheaply, there is little reason to invest in what has become an obsolete technology.

    1. Re:Not true by Daimaou · · Score: 1

      I never said that MD blanks weren't available. I said that America tried to market MDs like regular CDs; unlike Japan where they were marketed as a means to rent music CDs and copy them; a better solution to the cassette tape. I never saw an artists produced MD in Japan (although they may have existed).

      Your MD history is incorrect. MP3s weren't popular until the mid to late 90s, and they didn't gain widespread use until Napster came out. MDs were available in the U.S. back in the mid to late 80s. They had 10 years to catch on but never did because of cost and poor marketing.

      You can get 80 Minute MDs too.

  186. When I worked in Akihabara... by shanen · · Score: 1
    Not sure I should risk posting this Tripod link on /., but it's about when I worked in Akihabara.

    Plastic Ninjas, Fake Nurses, and other Chindonya Stories

    Perhaps I'm just jaded, but I don't think the Japanese gadgets are so great. It took me several days to get used to the bizarre new toilets after they remodeled the rest rooms at my office... Actually, I blame the French for that specific problem.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  187. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1
    To make matters worse, they've convinced people here that "ultra-pasturized" means "better", even though it just means they used extra high temperatures to get it done more quickly and save money at the expense of flavor. That means the milk here doesn't taste nearly as good as it could under the current regulations.

    On a whim and out of curiousity, I once bought a half gallon of organic milk. Normally milk goes to waste in my fridge, going bad in 5 days while it would take me 7-8 to actually finish the smallest of containers. This organic milk, on the other hand, lasted the whole week it took to consume. Strange thing, I thought, must be something they add to the feed of conventionally fed cows. Then I found a cheaper organic milk, tried it out, and voila, it went bad after 5 days just like my ordinary conventional milk. When next in the store, I read the containers. All the milks were merely pasteurized except for my spontaneously bought organic milk -- which was ultra-pasteurized. My conclusion: If I don't have to buy two containers of milk per week, spending 25% more for organic ultra-pasteurized milk is saving me 75% on milk.

    I have to look really hard to find ultra-pasteurized milk. I can't tell the difference, but I only like skim anyway (due to childhood lactose intolerance, I didn't really grow up accustomed to the taste of milk). I'm not convinced that ultra-pasteurization really means better, only that it's worth paying a premium for in order to save myself money.

  188. I dont see the problem here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single thing in Japan was invented here (US)... They just "improved it" (AKA, made it talk and flash with more lights). I wouldn't worry that they are ahead of us because they tend to stick with preinvented ideas.

  189. Re:There are too many regulations & lawsuits i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Also, rediculous lawsuits

    Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ri-Ridicu lous.

  190. Nonsense by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

    Another journalistic pile of crap trying to derive great meaning from so very little. I remember an article of this sort from the early 80's predicting the entire center of technological innovation was soon to be in Tokyo with the USA at the periphery. Do you think they might have missed a few details in that prediction? Here is one of the most mind-numbing sentences from this article:

    "America has its share of early adopters, but they tend to be the exception rather than the rule; ..."

    If they were the rule rather than the exception they could hardly be called early adopters, could they?

    I'm not going to argue that there are some preferences that seem to be culturally ingrained. For instance I remain mystified why almost all my neighbors and friends feel a need for a military attack style vehicle for their day to day transportation needs. Judging by the stories I see in T3 magazine and elsewhere it seems like the Japanese are more willing to part with their money for small clever bits of electronics.

    But wherever you find yourself there is an abundance of gadgets that compete for your money and attention. I suppose it is related to having three children with their gadgets and desire for ever more but I don't see a dearth of options. The only example from the list of seven at the end of the article that causes any excitement for me is the PSP. Can I stand to wait six or seven weeks? I suppose having a fully deployed HDTV system and a PCI receiver board in my PC for viewing and capture could serve as a distraction. Couldn't do that at all in Japan until very recently and still can't outside a few of the largest cities.

  191. Even More Wrong, as usual. by JZlives · · Score: 0
    I must disagree. Japan is not a small country. Maybe from an American standpoint. I just really dislike how every time someone speaks of Japan they call it a "small country." No one ever says that about any of the countries in Europe. "Oh my goodness, that England is a small country." In fact Japan is a medium sized country, very average in this world, with a population of 125 million people. Plus, those $400 phone everyone keeps talking about, they're usually free with a plan here. Just 1 yen. I should know, I'm using one now.

    Japanese youth are very status oriented. Meaning they want big name items, big brand name items. Shoot, Japan is a giant test market for soft drinks. I finally find a Fanta drink I like, and its replaced by a new flavor in a week.

    Japan is highly misunderstood in the US. Quite frankly its a wonderful place to live, and a hell of a lot more friendly then most of the US.

    --
    The RIAA fined my dog for barking too much like the Back Street Boys. They later came back and shot my dog for looking
    1. Re:Even More Wrong, as usual. by sakusha · · Score: 1
      No one ever says that about any of the countries in Europe. "Oh my goodness, that England is a small country."

      In fact, I wrote exactly that, but removed it from my original remarks as it didn't quite fit in. The specific analogy I was making: In England, a Top 40 music hit can reach #1 with far fewer sales than in a larger country like the US, disproportionately smaller even considering the relative populations. The smaller country (geographically) has some effect I don't quite understand, it has that "pressure cooker" effect on the rise of trends, not quite as intense as Japan, but somewhat similar. I thought maybe England had this effect because the entire country is within reach of a single media broadcast monopoly, but they still have regional music scenes that reach out across the country.

      And if you think Japan is a "hell of a lot more friendly then [sic] most of the US" then you're still living in the dreamworld of tatemae. Maybe someday you'll penetrate a bit deeper to the honne. Japan is still a third-world country with a veneer of high-tech pasted over it.
  192. It's the dreaded teenage-industrial complex by gomel · · Score: 1

    In the US it's directed by the Pentagon and Eisenhower warned against it. It's principle was: "If it kills more, we buy it."

    Gadget fanatics with unlimited spending power have been driving the technological progress in the US since the 50s. When national security is on the line, the customer pays any price. That's why companies could afford to risk doing expensive R&D. Until the PC-era (80s) computerisation was a 100% military sponsored gig.

    In Japan you have now customers who will buy any new expensive digital sh*t, provided that it's small and blinks. That's a small prize for progress.

    P.S., the european technological progress in the middle ages was also fueled by two key customer groups: luxury trade (furs and spices) and the military to protect them.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  193. Mitsubichi Motors... by K.Bu · · Score: 1

    Hum... just for reminder, since parent seems not to live in Japan.

    There is no country in the world where quality is as important as in Japan. The consumer will immediatly sanction any company that dares to sell something that is somehow crappy. The recent case of Mitsubichi Motors is the best proof of it. Recently, Mitsubichi did not recall a motor with a potential defective behaviour. Eventually some non mortal accident happened. As an immediate consequence, almost all activities of Mitsubichi (the largest bank in the world) have seen their sales revenues fail. Mitsubichi people are living without their bonus, no matter if they are in Mitsubichi Motors, Electric, the bank or wherever.

    Ah, by the way, the customer service in Japan is just amazing. You never return things because you never need to. I know it is difficult to understand, but Japanese trust Japanese. As a consequence, when my wife order my French Wine from an internet retail ec site, we get delivered, and we only pay far latter, in a convinient store, when it happens that we can. You only need to bring your bill to Family Mart or something like this. This level of trust is impressive for an european like me.

    Anybody that dare to say that Japanese are not quality concious, brand aware, consumer service minded to the utmost is obviously somebody that never left Texas...

    I dont understand one more time how this could be modded up??? But well here is Slashdot.

    --

    ---
    By the way I apologies my dear US friend, I'm French...
    1. Re:Mitsubichi Motors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I dont understand one more time how this could be modded up??? But well here is Slashdot.

      Yup. I lived, worked and studied in Japan and I must say I have never seen such a wretched hive of scum and desinformation as here on Slashdot. The word "insightful" has been drained, vampirically, of its meaning.

  194. Re:Ob. South Park Ref. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trillions of dollars spent on viagra and enlargement pills.

  195. It's the relative cost by readin · · Score: 1

    I don't think culture has that much to do with it. Imagine you're American have $20,000 to spend. You could buy a car and drive the highways and cruise for chicks. You could redo the cabinets in your kitchen or add an enclosed deck to your home. You could buy 5 acres of land out in the country. Now imagine you're Japanese and have $20,000 to spend. You could buy a car and have no place to park it. You could add an extra square foot onto your home. The Japanese just don't have as many spending options as Americans do. Americans can buy most things a lot cheaper. But electronics cost about the same. So as a Japanese person it makes more sense to spend your money on electronics because you get good value for money. An American has more opportunities to get good value for money buying other things.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  196. Bullet Train by ThinkPad760 · · Score: 1

    and after 25 years, America still does not have a high speed train between any two major cities.
    Tokyo City center --> Osaka city center (552.6km/343.369721 miles) in 2.5 hours. Envy Factor: 5

  197. What an idiot. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    "You think the allies won because of "better guns"?

    There was a lot more to it than that, man. Strategy, luck and countless thousands of men all played a part in winning WW2."


    Rrrright. Good strategy and thousands of men without guns. That would work just great.

    People like you are absolutely clueless. Maybe you could show me where I said we won with "better guns". Nice try setting up a straw man. Too bad it didn't work out for you. Idiot.

  198. Huh? by stor · · Score: 1

    What's all the abuse for? You trying to be tough?

    Rrrright. Good strategy and thousands of men without guns. That would work just great.
    Eh? I said: "Strategy, luck and countless thousands of men all played a part in winning WW2."
    Played a part.

    People like you are absolutely clueless.
    Thanks for the insult. I hope it makes you feel like a big tough man.

    Maybe you could show me where I said we won with "better guns".
    Perhaps I misunderstood. Sorry if that's the case. You were replying to a post that stated:

    because we spend our money on the latest and greatest weapons and warfare.

    To which you responded:
    If I remember correctly, that paid off the last time Japan attacked us. ...suggesting that superior weaponry won WWII. Perhaps I've missed something.

    Nice try setting up a straw man. Too bad it didn't work out for you. Idiot.
    Do you ever wonder why noone talks to you at parties? Or don't they invite you?

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  199. Re:Ob. South Park Ref. by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    even better - a hammer and balls

  200. Forget two items... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and those of us who are into conspicuous consumption prefer non-technological money wasters, like big houses, Persian rugs, and so on.
    how about fast car and hot chick :)

  201. this has been goin on for years by Mean+Ass+Troll · · Score: 1

    tech goodies in japan are lightyears ahead of the us and canada. im not gonna bother pointing out examples as anyone can come up with incidental data. the short of it is japanese manufacturers have to give the public better gadgets, or be unemployed. the japs really vote with their wallets. in america everyone is patiently waiting for intel to raise their proc's by 0.01 g hz or some hokey threading tech or other marketing scam (these are not innovations, but fixed bugs and bottlenecks that intel touts as breakthroughs). there is not enough competition here so tech companies take their sweet time releasing products. just loot at how slowly pda ram is goin up. instead they pack em w crap like bluetooth/wifi. by now pdas should be full on video mp3 devices. and if you think pda's dont need memory, fine, look at how shitty AND expensive graphic cards are these days. before a 30 $ card was top of the line and could play any game. now that there are only 2 major card makers, each with products priced pennies apart, price fixing seems like the only option. so the only things you should really buy thats canadian or american are socks and underwear.

  202. Speaking from Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't quite correct to say there aren't 99 cent phones here in Japan. When I got my cellphone here six months ago, I asked if the phone couldn't just be free, and they said "Yeah, if you choose the model from earlier this year". And now, cancelling the service, they say I can keep the phone. Free. Having used it less than a year I pay $30 cancellation fee, but that's it.

    Granted they do get enough people wanting hugely expensive latest fashionable cellphone models, and that helps support the industry. But my "older model" still has more features than the best thing I've seen in the states. Email, camera, etc.

    As the economy here slips back into reverse, the pressure will come back for ordinary people to tighten their spending habits. This will shrink the fashion-pursuing segment of society that has famously supported Japan's small-gadgets economy. On the other hand, lifestyles remain compact [small cars, small apartments, etc.] regardless of the economy, and that means Japanese society will NEVER turn to emphasizing the big wasteful crap products. They will just get their small gadgets made cheaper in China.

    The American economy and the Japanese economy both pay pretty insane prices for different things--for instance, there is no real "bottom end" in the American housing market; there is simply no such thing as sub-$400 housing in most areas, no matter how low quality/ small size you are willing to tolerate. Also, underregulated mega-corporations in both countries are allowed to shit on consumers in different ways--like those three year minimum phone contracts that were mentioned.

    And people have mentioned the American patriotic duty of spending every last dollar the minute it is earned--if not sooner. And there's the incomes--like even the lowliest waiter here getting $7 an hour. All these things are true, but none of them are the whole picture. I think our countries are really not so different overall; the differences are in random details.

  203. Posting from Japan here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true what they say, that teachers are more respected in Japan/ Asia. And that is not entirely a good thing. Teachers almost never get any feedback from students, and they don't expect it, so they never improve their communication skills. Western teachers find themselves "respected" to death, unable to get students to even bat an eye in response to a discussion question. And Western students find themselves unable to learn from teachers who can never grok a question.

    On the other hand, "learning by rote" is exactly what the Asian one-way educational paradigm can still do. Don't under-rate rote learning: Half a brain can do a whole lot of learning, from processing enough rote data. That is exactly the method that is used by most of these countries that blow us away on achievement tests.

    The people who make noises like, "But we teach creativity! We teach children social skills, and character, and love of life!" -- not that it is impossible, but those people are almost always just sheltering their own failures behind a smokescreen of subjectivized variables. You know I am talking about Western education [oops-I-misspelled-daycare] systems.

    There is another factor that I don't see being said yet, that a safe/ stable/ prosperous society makes the average student *far* less willing to put out heroic effort. Japan is affected by this syndrome just like the US: In an over-educated society kids yawn & fidget their way through a dumbed-down, drawn-out educational system just to qualify for mindless McJobs. What's to love there?

    My Chinese international student friends love this fact about Japan & the US: They end up looking so brilliant [and lets them get all the good scholarships] when the local students they compete with are so lackadaisical about studies. [You know, the same would be true in the US, except that internationals are categorically shut out of most scholarships.]

    1. Re:Posting from Japan here... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much of 'Western' is supposed to apply to every 'Western' country, or if you mean it to mean "mainly the US".

      The fact you mention ths US by name later on suggests that you mean "US". Bear in mind I am not American. At the same time, I don't know enough about the American educational system to point out where it might differ (or not) from that in other western countries.

      Rote learning is important to some extent, but it's a means to an end. I got fantastic pass marks on my driving theory test, but my driving lessons are still going badly because theory -|-> application.

      I think it's important to balance these things out.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  204. Re:It's the tech in Japan, and the food in Europe. by ratamacue · · Score: 1
    That means the milk here doesn't taste nearly as good as it could

    Tell me about it. We went to Costa Rica a few months ago, and the milk there is orders of magnitude better tasting than ANY milk I've had in the states. Same goes for the beef, chicken, and pork. When you don't feed steriods and other chemicals to your livestock, they come out tasting like they should.

  205. MOD PARENT UP by Hobart · · Score: 1

    The argument, and it's a very valid one, being trumpeted by the irrational paranoid "radidation is bad, think of the children" idiots, is that the meat industry is full of many abhorrent greedy people who like the idea of selling meat packaged and handled in disgusted feces-filled E.coli-laden surroundings.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  206. Re:Raw beef hamburger? Simple! by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Ground beef is nasty stuff. You wouldn't want to see the room where ground beef is produced.

    Been there, done that. I worked several years in food service before going to IT, and the only reason I still eat hamburger (or out, for that matter) is a demonstrated massive resistance to food poisoning.

    I also studied nuclear engineering before doing the food service, and have no qualms about irradiated food. Irradiated burger isn't THAT much pricier-- maybe as high as $4 a pound, instead of $3 per pound. Quality steak is a lot more (locally, anyhoo), and I'm not that fond of rare burgers. Given my druthers, I'd rather have the quality steak unground, especially given my (low-end) IT salary makes burgers more sensible.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  207. Ah by xant · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I remember seeing a diagram that showed that debt interest was more than 50% of the total budget, but my memory may be flawed... that may have been a projection.

    Still, I'm right about DoD being #2, according to your numbers. :-)

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.