Slashdot Mirror


Wells Fargo Web-Enables ATMs

smooth wombat writes "Wells Fargo has completed a five-year project to Web-enable its 6,200 ATMs in 23 states. Now the ATMS will be Windows based rather than OS/2 based. Avivah Litan, an analyst at Gartner Inc., in Stamford, Conn., said the move to Windows-based systems is "not great news for the security of the system. I'm sure there's a lot of holes that will be created because of this.""

576 comments

  1. was a change required? by Frogmum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What was wrong with OS/2 atms?

    1. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The marketing people at Microsoft convinced them that .NET made everything secure!

    2. Re:was a change required? by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Informative

      No one sells 'em anymore, at least not in the quantities Wells-Fargo needs.

    3. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Navigating around popup windows: 2 minutes of user frustration

      Pressing "cancel" 10+ times to stop spyware installs: 2 minutes of user frustration

      Entering pin number after someone else already pressed "ok" on spyware install: priceless

    4. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OS/2 is no longer supported.

    5. Re:was a change required? by Frogmum · · Score: 1

      I see, thanks.

    6. Re:was a change required? by QMO · · Score: 4, Funny

      The BOFH hates OS/2, and you DON'T want to make him mad.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    7. Re:was a change required? by SoLO · · Score: 1

      No native apps, everyone writes for the windows emulation layer.

    8. Re:was a change required? by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with using Trustix or another Linux distribution for a task like this?

    9. Re:was a change required? by Deviate_X · · Score: 4, Informative
      IBM recommends OS/2 users migrate off OS/2 to either Linux or Windows 2000. Thats whats wrong with it, probably nothing technically (yes OS/2 developers are relics), more comercial.

      Given than Wells Fargo, is a substatial entity, it would be interesting and credible to know how/why they decided to go the windows route since it is possible to maintain a large number networked Linux nodes for remote updates/admin as is cited in the article about windows.

      Are windows embedded ATMs really the only game in town?

    10. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS/2

      The collaboration between IBM and Microsoft unravelled in 1990, between the releases of Windows 3.0 and OS/2 1.3. The increasing popularity of Windows prompted Microsoft to shift its development focus from OS/2, and IBM grew concerned about delays in development of OS/2 2.0. Initially, the companies agreed that IBM would take over maintenance of OS/2 1.0 and development of OS/2 2.0, while Microsoft would continue development of OS/2 3.0, then known as "NT OS/2". However, Microsoft decided to recast NT OS/2 as Windows NT, leaving all future OS/2 development to IBM. Windows NT's OS/2 heritage can be seen in its initial support for the HPFS filesystem (although write support was dropped in Windows NT 4.0 and read support was dropped in Windows 2000) and text mode OS/2 1.x applications (support dropped in Windows XP).

      So they basically upgraded to a newer version of OS/2 in a weird twisted Microsoft sort of way.

    11. Re:was a change required? by rsmoody · · Score: 5, Informative

      I asked that myself when the bank I work for started upgrading our ATM's to 3DES. Some are still OS/2 but some are windows bassed. And it uses regular Windows, not embeded, it's straight Windows 2000. To tell you the truth, I acutally liked the Windows based ATM. From a stand point of having to hold the tellers hand over the phone because they are not trained properly, it makes it easier on us because the Windows ATM actually have help screens and short movie clips that can walk the undertrained (read stupid) teller through the proceedure of properly inserting a cassette of money (as if it were that difficult). The OS/2 ATMs are only character menu driven, the Windows ATM's are all graphical. The actual screens the customer sees are actually web pages so it's easy to make them look how you want and not be a programmer.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    12. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work for a financial services provider that has about 100 ATMs in the field. They're from Diebold, and up until very recently, they ran OS/2. Why'd we switch? Well, first of all, Diebold does not provide NEW machines that run anything other than Windows, so if you are doing a major deployment, and you buy from Diebold, you're getting Windows. Second of all, the industry is moving to 3DES at gunpoint (that gun wielded by our friends at Visa and MasterCard) and Diebold only supports 3DES on Windows-based ATMs.
      Now, it's true that you don't have to TCP/IP-connect a Windows-based ATM, you can operate it solely over SNA or SDLC or whatever you have -- but if you do you don't get all the features of the ATM, and not just the annoying things like HTML-based UI -- you don't get the handy stuff like remote management which means that you spend $$ sending humans out to the site rather than just doing task 'x' from your network.

    13. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      What was wrong with OS/2 atms?

      Too secure.

    14. Re:was a change required? by mpaque · · Score: 4, Funny

      Simply put, the OS/2 based ATMs didn't run the mission critical software that the Wells Fargo IT department felt was necessary on public access terminals, which is fundamentally what ATMs are. They require applications like Disk Defragmenter, Scandisk, Norton AV, Windows Update and Ad-Aware - none of which are available for the OS/2 platform.

      In today's climate of non-stop worms, trojans and viruses, deploying an ATM with no virus removal software would be irresponsible on the part of Wells Fargo.

      (With apologies to divisiontwo.com. :-)

    15. Re:was a change required? by jd · · Score: 1
      Nothing, that's the problem. Customers who had switching from other banks were so used to flaws, they were getting confused.


      Also, what's with web-enabling everything? The web is OK as a general low-bandwidth medium, but just look at how much technology has been bolted on to make it actually DO anything? (Even CGI Perl scripts are bolt-on, when you get right down to it.)


      Bluetooth, I could understand. Notify the bank machine in advance what you'd like. When you get there, you type in your PIN and the pre-processed order is dealt with on the spot. It would make things much faster, especially when things are busy or you're in a rush and don't have time to tell it that, yes, you really do speak English.


      Of course, you don't expect Diebold to add anything USEFUL to a machine, do you?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    16. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're from Diebold, and up until very recently, they ran OS/2. Why'd we switch?

      They're from Diebold. Enough reason to switch right there.

    17. Re:was a change required? by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Funny

      handy stuff like remote management

      I think that's the problem that everyone is worried about... that all of the sudden all the machines will be "remote managed" by someone and they'll start spitting out free money. Or logging card numbers/PINs.

    18. Re:was a change required? by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The actual screens the customer sees are actually web pages so it's easy to make them look how you want and not be a programmer."

      Yeah but do you REALLY want a feature that allows unqualified individuals modify the interface of ATM machines? Isn't that something you want the bar set a little higher on?

    19. Re:was a change required? by shaitand · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes but why did you have to go with Diebold again? They are notorious for buggy and insecure systems, just look how they botched up voting on a PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

    20. Re:was a change required? by The_Dougster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The BOFH hates OS/2, and you DON'T want to make him mad.

      If the BOFH had done this job, he would have had Wells-Fargo purchase a super-deluxe QNX licensing contract, then he would have installed BSD on the machines and pocketed the change.

      Ahh, OS/2, I miss it. The last time I whipped out my OS/2 Warp disks and tried to install it, it didn't seem to like my 10 years newer hardware and couldn't find a HDD driver. Bummer. I can only imagine how fast it would have run on my 2GHz box.

      I think that Wells-Fargo should have used QNX, and now whoever made the decision is probably going to pay. Windows on an ATM connected to the internet is pretty damn frightening. Time to withdraw all my zorkmids out of the bank and stuff it under the mattress.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
    21. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run the IT department for a credit union in Maryland. We have around 25 ATMs, all Diebold brand. Some are Windows based (IBM Optiva guts), and some are OS/2 based. All the ATMs support 3DES encryption.

    22. Re:was a change required? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you spend $$ sending humans out to the site rather than just doing task 'x' from your network.

      So banks like yours and Wells Fargo are sacrificing security for a little extra profit.

      I'm sure there are plenty of crackers who will be perfectly happy to do "task 'x, y & z'" on your web-enabled, Windows machines.

      Tell me, will I need to pay a $20 convenience fee to Wells Fargo everytime someone breaks into a Wells Fargo ATM and steals my account information?

    23. Re:was a change required? by E_elven · · Score: 1
      So banks like yours and Wells Fargo are sacrificing security for a little extra profit.

      You're going for a '+1 funny', huh?
      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    24. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3DES and Video can be done by any number of O/S's.
      The hardware re-write should have been tendered out. OpenBSD or Linux, and a bit of PHP would have done the trick, including video.

      Now, you have a MS stack, 3DES or not, with attendant risks, timing attacks, etc. Small and tight proprietary code is good. Having half and half is good - if a disaster happens, only 50% are vulnerable. A bank that puts 100% of its eggs in one basket and one OS - thats one big of an omelette.

      Its a big downgrade - and everything wrong in voting machines will apply here, forged logs, access databases, maybe worms and virus's, sub7's and pcanywheres - are not what ATM's should be capable of running.

    25. Re:was a change required? by Flywheel · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Ahh, OS/2, I miss it. The last time I whipped out my OS/2 Warp disks and tried to install it, it didn't seem to like my 10 years newer hardware and couldn't find a HDD driver. Bummer. I can only imagine how fast it would have run on my 2GHz box."

      Try the Danis506 drivers, et even has got some SATA support. eComStation runs rather nice om my 1.8Ghz Athlon XP - Barton box, especially with the new kernel.

      --
      Live long and prosper...
    26. Re:was a change required? by Flywheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well actually OS/2 does have support for and uses a graphical user interface today - somehow it shuld be possible to add animations and graphical multicolour menus ... well I'll return to my DVD watching, on my eComStation (OS/2) box.

      --
      Live long and prosper...
    27. Re:was a change required? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      If that happens it won't be because of the OS they use. One can restrict access to only authorized IPs, detect spoofed IPs, encrypt the connection, allow only trusted connections, etc.

      Any properly configured OS could protect from 99% of problems (and no OS is 100% secure).

    28. Re:was a change required? by Rohan427 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your source for this bit of info?

      In addition, they couldn't go to another OS because?

      I've been contemplating changing banks for some time now (from Wells Fargo), but haven't for several reasons. This could be the straw that breaks this camel's back.

      (FYI, a few years ago I walked up to a WF ATM, started to put my card in, and noticed a M$ Dev. Studio GPF dialog asking if I wanted to debug the application or cancel!!)

      PGA

    29. Re:was a change required? by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You know, before writing in such a condescending manner about the "stupid" tellers who don't know how to use an ATM from the backside, you might consider learning how to use the English language.

      It's "based", not "bassed" and "procedure", not "proceedure". "Acutally" I can only assume was actually supposed to be "actually". Oh, and "stand point" is one word, "standpoint". "It uses regular Windows" should be "They use regular Windows"; plurality matters. I won't even get into the structure of that sentence. "The Windows ATM actually have help screens" should be the plural "Windows ATMs", with no apostrophe since the "M" is not lowercase.

      Finally, "tellers" is plural, but "teller's" is possessive, as in "hold the teller's hand", which is what I believe was what you wanted, but that will never happen if you do not treat them with the respect another human being deserves.

      Language and writing are tools like any other and you are obviously, well, "undertrained".

    30. Re:was a change required? by notthe9 · · Score: 1

      For 6,000+ units, you can get whatever the hell you want.

    31. Re:was a change required? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      The more important question is: What bonehead thought it would be a good idea to hook ATMs up to the internet?

      I don't care what OS you're using, that's just stupid.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    32. Re:was a change required? by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's the problem... If I were designing it, I'm not so sure I'd go with IP-based communications. I'd prefer dedicated phone lines with a simple serial protocol that is easy to make secure. Of course, there are situations where an IP-based protocol would be necessary (high traffic areas, like a grocery store), so I'd use a hard firewall like this TCP/IP-to-serial converter -- that way, if the network stack gets hacked and the processor compromised, it won't have access to the bill-spitter or the keyboard.

      Of course, there would still be the encryption and authentication... but, there won't be vulnerabilities from tcp packet reassembly, open ports, activeX, javascript, and html exploits. And, if a machine is compromised (inside job), there's no way to connect to the internet in general to report back phished data (unless the main server is also compromised, in which case, you're already in deep doo-doo).

    33. Re:was a change required? by th4tGuy() · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they upgraded the hardware while "upgrading" the OS?

      I remember when my local WF switched to these ATMs. The first thing I noticed is that the ATM couldn't keep up with me while I enter my long (12 digit) pin. The entire interface is substantially slower, although it does have pretty pictures of happy people doing things with their money!

      I seriously don't like the new ATMs simply for the fact that they can't keep up with the buttons I push to get $20 out... as far as I'm concerned, speed is what OS/2 did right.

      --
      -- As soon as I have an interesting sig, you'll be among the first to know!
    34. Re:was a change required? by megaversal · · Score: 1

      FYI, a few years ago I walked up to a WF ATM, started to put my card in, and noticed a M$ Dev. Studio GPF dialog asking if I wanted to debug the application or cancel!!)

      All the touchscreen WF ATMs I've used in the past few years (I'm a customer) have all been IE-based. It's funny when something happens to the images and some show up as that X image that IE shows when the image can't be found.

      --
      Sig!
    35. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Main reason for the change is the lack of motherboard chipset drivers for OS/2 (and also but lesser amount for graphics cards).
      As an Ex ATM developer programming ATM's isn't that hard, Microsoft C v6 (creates OS/2 exe just fine or Intel Pascal are the main languages of choice).

      OS/2 Warp4 still does the job just fine, and you'll find that OS/2 supported TCP/IP also it displays Mpegs just fine. Plus it runs quite nicely on 8/16 megs of ram on older 386/486 processors. Plus most of these machines are 10-18 years old.

      There are numerous Linux based ATM's in Spain & Germany - and a number of banks around the world that do not/ will not go the windows based route.
      But getting programming resource is far easier for windows if you want to program your ATM in VB. (those OK/Cancel error dialog boxes are much easier to create). if you replace the default windows exception handle you can get rid of system and application generated exception questions (Why these diaglog boxes appear is beyond me, although I'm sure VB developers wouldn't even know how to scratch thier ass).

    36. Re:was a change required? by nolife · · Score: 1

      Well, let's put this in perspective...
      I use the web all the time to access my bank accounts, which includes transfer money around, apply for and pay my loans (including my mortgage), use bill pay to pay others etc... The web seems to be acceptable by many people for those functions. The only difference is I can not actually recieve cash out the front of my computer. Of course my bank would allow me to withdrawl funds or have a check mailed to my house from my account. Basically I can do many more functions from my home computer over the internet then I could at any web based ATM. I'm not trying to say it is not a risk and I am not saying W2K is the best choice for the ATM OS itself but can someone provide some situations where a web based ATM or ATM network could be violated much worse or any easier then the network front end to the bank that the web users access?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    37. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy cow. I read his entire paragraph and did not notice any errors, it was exactly how I'd expect a busy person to post on a forum--we're not writing theses here. Besides, is not the purpose of language to convey ideas from one single organism to others? IMO the poster above did just that. You can do that just fine with mispellings and small grammatical errors.

      You want to learn to understand some odd language? Come down south, we'll learn ya.

    38. Re:was a change required? by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      I find this to be very odd. About 15 years ago I worked for a company that was doing crypto work for one of the big four local banks. And part of the work I had to do was design a validation scheme for Security Control Modules that were supplied by another company (which I more recently worked for) and also writing my company's supporting libraries that used DES and implement 3DES. The SCM modules were basically PCs running OS/2. Their features were required to include 3DES as well as a host of other functions required for key management, very interesting stuff. But 3DES is a simple extension of DES. Sure there would be obstacles to converting the ATMs over but converting the OS/2 crypto libraries would not be the problem and this is real money stuff so there is a big incentive to have something secure. Obviously I don't know what the real motives are here but it all seems very dodgy.

      More likely they are using hardened wintel boxes specifically made for this purpose (tamper proof and all) with a plug-in PCI card for the crypto work. Probably they can't get suitable libraries from the suppliers for OS/2 compilers (sorry don't know much about compiling stuff on OS/2). But then again I'm just guessing.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    39. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wells Fargo ATMs aren't hooked up to the internet.

      They are hooked up to a private intranet (10.0.0.0 address space)

      I can't say more though.

    40. Re:was a change required? by Svartalf · · Score: 1
      What if an atm-worm went around recording every atm transaction? Jesus christ.


      Yep. That's why I tell people that using Windows for such things is irresponsible. I don't care how much you thought you 'saved' on development- if it's insecure, it shouldn't flippin' be used.

      It keeps amazing me what they'll put Windows into and put up with it crashing. You'd think people would learn about all of this by now, but noooo....
      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    41. Re:was a change required? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of the Wells Fargo ATMs I've seen recently, are Diebold machines.

      I would imagine that Diebold was the one who made the decision to go to Windows.

    42. Re:was a change required? by Loligo · · Score: 1


      >Second of all, the industry is moving to 3DES at
      >gunpoint (that gun wielded by our friends at Visa
      >and MasterCard)

      What were they running before?

      What are the technologically superior options? What are the costs involved? How much more secure are these options? What's the break-even point?

      Before you go pointing fingers at "the industry", consider their options, their costs, and how much YOU are willing to pay for them.

    43. Re:was a change required? by gwait · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you only need a virus scanner if you are using windows!!

      That's like the developer I know who wouldn't consider switching to ultrastable CVS because it didn't have a "repair corrupted database" feature like Source (un)Safe from Microsoft..

      40 Billion flies can't be wrong...

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    44. Re:was a change required? by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Given the amount of legacy OS/2 stuff out there and IBM's push on Linux, it is a wonder that they haven't released an OS/2 emulation layer for Linux. I can understand that it might not be possible to open source everything, but to not release nothing at all and advise to use someone elses product?

      Something akin to WINE but for OS/2 with IBM's endorsement would be a useful thing. They could open source headers, specifications, internal docs and other unencumbered things to set things off.

    45. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup with ATM device interface on Linux being Java j/XFS rather than the windows XFS one (either the direct C interface or the ActiveX XFS version).

      So what device would you like to interface with today? (it's much easier to hack with a ActiveX interface, no silly libraries to link with to talk to the devices....)

      ATM have about 17 devices hanging off a system device controller (ISA/PCI card) or USB.
      main ones being the card reader, Cash dispenser, depository, indicator lights, function keys, and the customer key pad & the hardware encryptor (which is normally directly wired into the customer key pad for direct encryption of pins)

    46. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was wrong with OS/2 atms?

      I assume they provided no job security for the procuring MCSE's.

    47. Re:was a change required? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      An ATM would be the ultimate phishing site.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    48. Re:was a change required? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      it makes it easier on us because the Windows ATM actually have help screens
      I can't think of a more ludicrous or trivial example of throwing technology at something. Not when such a concept as an instruction manual exists.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    49. Re:was a change required? by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you only need a virus scanner if you are using windows!!

      Yes, thank you for pointing out the obvious joke.

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    50. Re:was a change required? by MPHellwig · · Score: 1



      So that's the reason why you comment on the grammar and not on the content?

    51. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can secure my own computer. I know that my bank has computer people that will do the same for the internet banking servers -- they provide a text only version of the site, they must have some people who know what they are doing.

    52. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The really funny thing is, i was reading your comment through IE on my windows machine...

      And when i went to scroll down I found out that it had locked up!

      Not sure if Irony is the right word...

    53. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just imagine portscanning the network and getting an ATM with VNC enabled.

    54. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignore the crackaddict mods. They must have been living under a rock during that.

    55. Re:was a change required? by ECSUSER · · Score: 1

      Somebody 2 years ago forwarded an email to me with questions about making a new install CD for there ATM machines. Turns out they where still using OS/2 2.1! Most machines also had low processing power. Thats why you see textscreens mostly!

      And besides OS/2 can run on just about any hardware. Look here, www.os2warp.be. Firewire, 1 gigabit NIC's, USB, plenty of video and IDE chipsets supported. If you look a little futher you can run video's and fancy graphics without any problem on OS/2/eComStation.

      So a large part of the arguments to use OS/2 is kind of based on quicksand. If you want your ATM to run OS/2, you can do that. Its not hard :-)

    56. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, buy yourself a new OS/2, called eComStation. That's the next generation of OS/2! Take a look at www.ecomstation.com and also at www.mensys.nl. Enjoy!

    57. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Single DES, most banks still do....

    58. Re:was a change required? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I think GP's point was that one should be careful how one presents oneself, BEFORE throwing around words like "stupid" in reference to others.

      Translation: STFU 14m3r! pWN3D!

    59. Re:was a change required? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      We have a Windows-based ATM near where I live. Around 20% of the time it is displaying a dialog box over the main interface telling the user that DHCP failed.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    60. Re:was a change required? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Now, it's true that you don't have to TCP/IP-connect a Windows-based ATM, you can operate it solely over SNA or SDLC or whatever you have --snip-- you don't get the handy stuff like remote management which means that you spend $$ sending humans out to the site rather than just doing task 'x' from your network.

      Why would you need to be connected to the public internet for remote management? There is no technical reason for this, TCP is just a transport; a private network could do this just as well.

      The only advantage I can see is that an ATM could share an existing lnternet connection, saving money. I doubt that a new net connection would be cheaper than an other communication mechanism used by ATMs.

      I take it these things are hidden behind a VPN and are not publicly available on the net?

    61. Re:was a change required? by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...whoever made the decision is probably going to pay...

      Probably he is being payed an undisclosed sum by a Redmond based software vendor.

      That's what I guess.

      I thinks this guy is clever, because he has no accounts at Wells Fargo!

      --
      Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
    62. Re:was a change required? by NTworks · · Score: 1

      I work for a mainframe datacenter, all the IBM equipment have service consoles which run OS/2. the ones for the newer z/ series mainframes are 3ghz P4's with DVD burners and SATA, all running OS/2 extremely fast

    63. Re:was a change required? by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      Maybe the poster has not excellent grammar skills, as long as his job isn't writing articles/books or something like that it has no effect on his work.

      But indeed it is questionable if an untrained non-educated personel should be called stupid.

      But it is stupid to let personal do tasks without proper training.
      That kind of training shouldn't be difficult either if the purpose of the training is "refuelling" the machine.

      I think that a plastic/paper map with nice pictograms should be enough training in this matter, if that is not enough the chance is quit high that the machine/procedure has a defective design.

      But hey who am I telling, since your translation is that the "GP" is "owned" I guess you knew that already!

    64. Re:was a change required? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The question is, why can't you send service a grocery store with some kind of serial connection. There isn't that much data from a single grocery bill. They have maybe 10 checkouts open, and each one probably takes at least 2 minutes per person. That means you have 5 checkouts per minute. Maximum. If you can't figure out how to send that over a slow connection, you aren't thinking hard enough.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    65. Re:was a change required? by Wieland · · Score: 1

      Great. You'll probably see the return of BLINK and MARQUEE tags on an ATM near you soon.

    66. Re:was a change required? by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Yes. IBM still uses OS/2 Warp for all its service equipment for its mainframes(with DVD-RAM no less for backup), ESCON directors, and pretty much all the other "big" hardware they sell. It works perfectly for its intended purpose.

    67. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (FYI, a few years ago I walked up to a WF ATM, started to put my card in, and noticed a M$ Dev. Studio GPF dialog asking if I wanted to debug the application or cancel!!)

      I've actually never seen a Win ATM crash up close, only pictures of it, but I have experienced OS/2 ATMs crashing, several times. One spontaneously rebooted with my card inside. After a long bootup process it came up asking me to insert card...

    68. Re:was a change required? by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      And they considered the abacus too leading edge.

    69. Re:was a change required? by carlislematthew · · Score: 1

      The article does not say that these machines are connected to the Internet - I highly doubt that they are. I would imagine that all "web content" is coming from Wells Fargo's internal intranet or is being served locally from the ATM itself.

    70. Re:was a change required? by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      My more important question is: What bonehead can find a reference to hooking these things up to the Internet in the article?

      Just because they are "web-enabled" does not mean that it must be connected to the Internet. I would guess that the "web content" is Intranet-based, or is being served locally.

      This is content and O/S issue, and not a connectivity change.

    71. Re:was a change required? by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      What was wrong with OS/2 atms?

      I would guess that the fact that IBM no longer supports OS/2 (along with being abandoned by everybody else) might be a clue.

      It was either Linux or Windows for the future. I can dissagree with the choice they made but I can't dissagree with the fact that they needed to switch.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    72. Re:was a change required? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Wow. Ease up on the commas, dude. You almost broke my brain.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    73. Re:was a change required? by Tuki · · Score: 1

      They were not compliant with the American's with Disabilities Act - http://www.aba.com/Industry+Issues/Issues_ATM_Menu .htm I work at a large bank, and we are going through the same "upgrades". I'm just glad that it is not my job to keep tens of thousands of ATMs at the latest patch level.

      --
      robots obey what the children say - TMBG
    74. Re:was a change required? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that many OS/2 shops rely older IBM "SNA" protocols, so even if they provided PM APIs for Linux, it wouldn't be enough to move the apps that keep people on OS/2. And the economics of doing this don't really make sense for a "maintenance mode" OS (although I could see a supported VMWare etc solution).

      Plus, it's in IBM's long term interest to get the True Blue customers off the older techology suites and onto the new ones (Java, Websphere).

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    75. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a salient point. Many People confuse/fail to distinguish "web based" as a code /interface style from "internet based," using the web for communications. My fear is that if any of those systems touch the web, someone will find them and exploit the situation. The overhead cost to maintain security will be breathtaking. Hacker and slicers do most of this crap for fun, what happens when their really is money as the goal.

    76. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DES has long been depricated, so it's good to move away from it. It's stupid to move to 3DES, though, since that isn't a huge improvement, and it won't be very long before that gets depricated. They should have been moved to AES if they're doing the upgrade anyway.

    77. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try eComStation: http://www.ecomstation.com/

      It has a totally new installer and updated drivers and many other improvements over OS/2.

    78. Re:was a change required? by Misanthropy · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. QNX was the first thing that came to my mind. Why the hell anybody would think an embedded system like an ATM should run windows is beyond me.
      Besides QNX is MADE for this type of stuff. I would think that they would be crazy to have a internet connected ATM running windows.
      I wonder how big of a "bonus" their CIO got from Microsoft for signing this contract?

    79. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They require applications like Disk Defragmenter, Scandisk, Norton AV, Windows Update and Ad-Aware - none of which are available for the OS/2 platform."

      None of those apps are required on the OS/2 or eComStation platform! :)

      Cheers!

    80. Re:was a change required? by gwait · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I wish it was an obvious joke, but I've seen far too many comments from people who beleive otherwise :(
      You have a point tho, this being slashdot, most of us are probably not in this category!

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    81. Re:was a change required? by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a '+1 obvious' .

      But not sure why the Mods think it's a troll. All of those points are legitimate.

    82. Re:was a change required? by Snarfy · · Score: 1

      Happened to me too... then the bank wanted to charge me money to get a new card. I at least was able to get them to drop that charge, but it was a bit of a hassle.

    83. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's the code it takes to create a simple Dialog Box in OS/2 or eComStation:

      /* Create Dialog Window */
      call RxFuncAdd 'VInit', 'VREXX', 'VINIT'
      initcode = VInit()
      if initcode = 'ERROR' then signal CLEANUP
      signal on failure name CLEANUP
      signal on halt name CLEANUP
      signal on syntax name CLEANUP /* example VMsgBox call */
      msg.0 = 1
      msg.1 = 'Press "OK" to continue or "Cancel" to exit.'
      call VDialogPos 50, 50
      rb = VMsgBox('Example Simple Dialog', msg, 3)
      if rb = 'OK' then do
      msg.0 = 1
      msg.1 = 'You pressed "OK" '
      end
      else do
      msg.0 = 1
      msg.1 = 'You "Cancel" '
      end
      call VMsgBox 'Exit Dialog Window', msg, 1
      CLEANUP:
      call VExit

      This can easily be compiled into an exe with REXX2EXE.

      Here are pics of the Application:
      http://os2ecs.org:5000/ecs/SimpleDialog1.png
      http://os2ecs.org:5000/ecs/SimpleDialog2.png

      If one likes to code using Visual Environment there is always DrDialog:
      http://www.os2ezine.com/20010216/drdialog.html

      Application Development is a snap on OS/2 and eComStation!

      Cheers!

    84. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you debugged the application, as it was showing you it needed it.

    85. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diebold? You means as in "Election frauds are Us"?

      You know, if they are in control of both the money and the elections, they can just route your deposits directly to the government officials they want to bribe.

    86. Re:was a change required? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I think that a plastic/paper map with nice pictograms should be enough training in this matter, if that is not enough the chance is quit high that the machine/procedure has a defective design.

      It may not be the machines that are defective. Keep in mind that there are many cash registers out there that not just tell the person behind them WHAT coins to give for change but show them PICTURES of it.

      There are more than enough defective people in the world.

    87. Re:was a change required? by lgw · · Score: 1

      What if an atm-worm went around recording every atm transaction? Jesus christ.

      ATM transation recording happens often enough today, with "clever" devicies attached to ATMs. The thing is, you can't *do anything* with the stolen information without being physically present at a device connected to the ATM network. Eventually, the police will be present too.

      While this could certainly become an embarrassment for Wells Fargo, it's not like someone can steal a million dollars through an ATM.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    88. Re:was a change required? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I like that. You put in a pre-order to withdraw $100, and walk up and enter your PIN to confirm. Meanwhile, someone with a parabolic dish 200 yards away has also put in a pre-order to transfer $1000 to another account, which you've also just confirmed with that PIN.

      Speeding up the guy in front of me with no grasp of technology would be useful, but some things just shouldn't be wireless.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    89. Re:was a change required? by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's seriously messed up. I can't imagine it's an OS issue, but there's some remarkably poor client programming going on there. How did something like that pass any kind of QA?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    90. Re:was a change required? by Donny+Smith · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >If you can't figure out how to send that over a slow connection, you aren't thinking hard enough.

      What if a 20MB RAS-related security update were to be required on all ATMs?
      Wouldn't faster lines be needed for this and similar situations?

    91. Re:was a change required? by macdaddy · · Score: 1
      I decided to save my mod points and reply to your comment instead.

      "It uses regular Windows" should be "They use regular Windows"; plurality matters.

      Actually, his initial use of the word "Windows" was correct. "Windows(tm)" is singular, not plural. However the rest of his comment was thoroughly borked.

    92. Re:was a change required? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      /My other computer is your Windows machine/

      You seem to have answered your own question!

      Really, though, the difference is a matter of scale. Someone who cracks your machine gets access to your accounts. Someone who cracks an ATM gets access to hundreds, even thousands of people's accounts. That makes it a much more tempting target, and one that is likely to attract more skilled and/or dedicated crackers.

      Equivalent vulnerability, but one carries a much higher risk.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    93. Re:was a change required? by Mathiasdm · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I wish it was an obvious joke, but I've seen far too many comments from people who beleive otherwise :(
      I fear you might be correct :-(

      --
      Join the anonymous, help develop the network: http://www.i2p2.de
    94. Re:was a change required? by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      What? RTFA?!

      Where the hell do you think you are?!?!

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    95. Re:was a change required? by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 1
      Thanks for saving the mod points for something really important.

      However, the question of plurality is applied to the subject of the sentence, not the object of the verb. In this case, the subject is a pronoun ("it" or "they") which refers back to the "ATM's" (plural) in "the bank I work for started upgrading our ATM's to 3DES". And yes, "ATM's" should be "ATMs", but I am quoting the original. I did make a mistake, however; "They" should not have been capitalized.

      My goal was not to focus on the grammar, but rather to point out that the parent was labeling someone "stupid" simply because they do not value the same areas of knowledge. I am guessing that some of those "undertrained" tellers have skills and knowledge that have nothing to do with ATMs. It is more likely that some of those tellers have far more political and social skills than the parent poster. "Started out as a teller" is in many a manager's or vice president's corporate biography. Some of those "stupid" people will likely be your boss someday. Or the V.P. above your boss. They will still be clueless regarding the technology the bank uses, but that is not what they do. They, not you, will be making the decision as to whether you get to keep your job in IT. Who is more "stupid" at that point in time? Much as it leaves a certain taste in our mouths, we have to remember that we _serve_ the business of the corporation, not the other way around. It's how we get to play with the really good toys; we don't own them and often never could.

    96. Re:was a change required? by QMO · · Score: 1

      If they're in charge of the elections they don't need to bribe, and can keep the money.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    97. Re:was a change required? by hawk · · Score: 1
      Great! So If I make enough withdrawals, myu balance starts going up?

      :)

      hawk

    98. Re:was a change required? by lgw · · Score: 1

      The only information someone will get this way is some of the information on a printed check, plus a PIN. I don't see how that leads to buying laptops on ebay. I don't think there's not enough information on an ATM card to enable identity theft, and AFAIK to benefit from knowing a PIN you have to be physically present at an ATM or POS location or bank.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    99. Re:was a change required? by Kn0xy · · Score: 1

      "What was wrong with OS/2 atms?"

      Well, lets take the total amount of people who know how to work with OS/2, and then take the total amount of people who know how to work with Windows, then factor in which has a bigger surplus of people to pull from for jobs in repairing these.

      Also, DieBold, who supplies a lot of atms to a lot of financial institutions, has gone Windows Based (XP on a lot of models no doubt.). I suspect their move to Windows systems is based on the above fact that there are way more people out there who can fix a windows PC (basically all an ATM is, a PC w/ a Cash Cassettes and a NIC). Then people with experience in OS/2.

    100. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ahh, OS/2, I miss it. The last time..." Try http://www.ecomstation.com and miss no more! Be happy

    101. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your bank charges you to order a new debit card? Mine sent me one for free after my old one broke.

    102. Re:was a change required? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      You should have wrote one for him.

      #! /bin/bash

      echo -n Repairing and optimizing database...
      sleep 5
      echo done
      exit 0

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    103. Re:was a change required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In today's climate of non-stop worms, trojans and viruses, deploying an ATM with no virus removal software would be irresponsible on the part of Wells Fargo."

      Not that it needs it but OS/2 does actually have norton antivirus, but seeing as there is no OS/2 native virus, and there would be no way to get the virus on the atm in the first case, this is moot to say the least.

      "Simply put, the OS/2 based ATMs didn't run the mission critical software that the Wells Fargo IT department felt was necessary on public access terminals, which is fundamentally what ATMs are. They require applications like Disk Defragmenter, Scandisk, Norton AV, Windows Update and Ad-Aware - none of which are available for the OS/2 platform."

      Again, you don't need to defrag the disk because HPFS does not fragment (10 years on the same partition and it is less then 1% fragmented). That is also moot since they don't modify the hd enough to fragment it in the first place.

      Lol.. I really hope this was a joke :)

  2. Just what I want.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...having to kill a couple dozen pop-up windows when I want to take $20 out of the ATM.

    However, come to think of it, a lot of those things would look better with that Aquarium Screensaver. I think I'll click on the ok download button next time.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Just what I want.... by alset_tech · · Score: 2, Funny

      But if properly marketed....
      "Open a new account to take advantage of our new patented savings-encouragement-system."

      --
      Standing on the shoulders of giants.
    2. Re:Just what I want.... by johansalk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget the card games. Playing poker against an ATM computer appeals to me. Now that's a computer I'd like to beat!

    3. Re:Just what I want.... by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately, this might very well be the future of ATMs (only a bit exxagerated, but maybe not by much). Ad-sponsored ATMs are not that out of the question. So, instead of a "cute" logo from the bank, you might, in some future, be seeing a few ads while drawing some cash. Of course, the ATM vendor will claim to the banks that their system is totally secure and cannot be hijacked. We all know what that means.

    4. Re:Just what I want.... by mrseigen · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Would you like to go double-or-nothing on this withdrawal?" (Yes) (No)

    5. Re:Just what I want.... by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Which is in reality what happens. The old ATM did one thing, and did it very well. It gave you money. You put in your card, entered your pin, and completed a requested operation.

      The big reason for the change, as far as I can see, it to allow advertising and force a primary GUI input. The big thing is the advertising when you drive up, the advertising when you wait for your money, and the advertising when you leave.

      The other thing are the touch screens which often get borked. I push my finger and nothing happens. I understand that they may be more reliable than the old soft buttons, but realy.

      I am sure the key selling point was the propoganda. It would be a same not to fully utilize the customers time when said customer was a captive audience. it is fully justified because the customer does not have to use the ATM, the customer can just go to a teller!

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    6. Re:Just what I want.... by Feyr · · Score: 1

      hm i'm pretty sure i've seen ATMs with ads for other companies on them (on the screen, before you insert your card). that would have been in quebec though (desjardins ATMs)

    7. Re:Just what I want.... by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

      Well, that could be. I highly doubt those were dynamically-displayed ads, like banners on web sites, though. If they become "dynamic"... this is where the problems start. ATMs could very well display ads according to your buying habits, which could be guessed from your credit card internal history. I'm pretty sure this kind of stuff still doesn't exist.

    8. Re:Just what I want.... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      So, instead of a "cute" logo from the bank, you might, in some future, be seeing a few ads while drawing some cash

      Ironically, Wells Fargo already has advertisments on their ATM screens-- I've seen them for match.com, local tourist businesses, etc. Occasionally they've had video ads, but I think those were on an experimental basis.

    9. Re:Just what I want.... by jorgen · · Score: 1
      ...having to kill a couple dozen pop-up windows when I want to take $20 out of the ATM.

      You mean something like this? (photo of a swedish ATM machine running out of memory)

    10. Re:Just what I want.... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      ATMs could very well display ads according to your buying habits, which could be guessed from your credit card internal history.

      Or they could display ads based on your balance. Depending on how much money you had, an ad would appear for (a) a new luxury yacht, (b) a Toyota Corolla, or (c) a two-for-one special on Top Ramen.

      Personally, I wouldn't give a damn about ads if they'd get rid of the fees or else make them reasonable.

    11. Re:Just what I want.... by sumbry · · Score: 1

      I've banked with Wells Fargo for years and have seen some of these new Windows based ATMs already. It was *very* apparent when they switched, the old atm was monochrome green and the new one is color ... and ... they've already got advertisements on 'em. When you walk up to an unused one, it displays ads for random banking services but I expect to see Coke and Walmart ads anyday.

    12. Re:Just what I want.... by Bobsledboy · · Score: 1

      I already see ads for loans and credit cards on the atm screens at my bank while waiting for a transaction to go through.

    13. Re:Just what I want.... by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      I left the EFT industry in 1999 but well before then they were starting to deploy video and advertisements on ATMs. Oddly enough it was the push to advertise on ATMs that led the company I worked for to implement TCP/IP for ATM deployment. Prior to that they were happy with SNA and the like.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    14. Re:Just what I want.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then I lost, so I had to take off my shirt and one shoe.

      oh wait, what were we betting with again?

    15. Re:Just what I want.... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the card games. Playing poker against an ATM computer appeals to me.

      Or chess...

    16. Re:Just what I want.... by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

      Well, personally, I would. Freedom is priceless. Well, not quite, but almost. I hate those fees as well, but I would hate it even more that some random business knows how much cash I have, how much I draw and just to be bothered with constant advertising. I wouldn't be willing to give up privacy just to save the tiny fees I'm charged when I draw some cash - which, by the way, can usually be avoided if I draw cash in an ATM from my own bank or one of its agencies.

      To me, unwanted advertising is pretty much equivalent to spamming.

    17. Re:Just what I want.... by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      Since the "programmer" would doubtless use the wrong JavaScript code to display a MessageBox, it'd be more like:
      Would you like to go double-or-nothing on this withdrawal?
      [Ok]
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  3. Yes, but... by xeon4life · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're going to use Windows Embedded, not Windows XP. Two completely different code bases.

    Just because one has security issues does not mean the other will too.

    --
    Real programmers can write assembly code in any language. -- Larry Wall
    1. Re:Yes, but... by HarryCaul · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you implying that a Gartner analyst may not know what they're talking about?

      That would certainly be a first.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by Gilesx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe I'm wrong, but aren't they essentially the same kernel, with Embedded being a stripped down version?

      Either way, I wouldn't be the house on the kernel and networking components of XP being free from holes and possible exploits, Embedded or otherwise...

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    3. Re:Yes, but... by marvin2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you are saying that Microsoft has no problems making the embedded version secure and they introduce the holes in XP just for fun? I fail to see how Microsofts track record should make me go "Ohhh, it the *embedded* version. In that case I trust your security completely!"

    4. Re:Yes, but... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Are you implying that a Gartner analyst may not know what they're talking about?

      That would certainly be a first.


      Hardly.

      Just because analysts see how past trends have fallen doesn't mean they're 100% on mark 100% of the time. That'd be like saying O'Reilly isn't a lying, bigoted windbag because he's managed to get a few lucky hits when he's bullying his "guests" in his 'No Spin Zone'. All the while telling them to shut up or he'll kick they're asses and then later lying about it when confronted with the evidence.

      To drag myself back on topic - this is completely stupid. OS/2? Uhm, it has an IP stack thats more compliant than MS' (read: follows the RFCs) and last I checked was capable of connecting to the internet just fine (I should know, I used to work L2 IP/MPTS support @ IBM).

      Way to go Wells Fargo. I certainly hope your ATMs get hacked and you lose a shitload of customers over this.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    5. Re:Yes, but... by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh, no Windows XP Embedded is EXACTLY the same code base as Windows XP. It's basically a componentized version of Windows PE, much along the lines of what the community did with Bart's PE. Now if they were using Windows CE.net THEN it would be a different code base, but many DCOM components for CE.net share source code with their windows counterparts so running on x86 hardware means that many of the same exploits may exist. Now if Wells Fargo knows what they are doing there won't be any unnecessary services installed, but the way the component selection engine for XP Embedded works means that things like the IE engine get dragged into almost any usefull selection, meaning that all sorts of vulnarabilies exist.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because one has security issues does not mean the other will too.

      We are talking about the same Microsoft here? Big company, based in Redmond, convicted monopolist? Just checking.

    7. Re:Yes, but... by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      "Were this the old west, I would have shot him right between the head"

    8. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the article mentioned, they're using Java, so they should be able to do this stuff without enormous dependices on Windows components.

      OTOH, the Diebold Wells Fargo ATMs I use are certainly running IE, because you see the exact same [X] icon when an image fails to load.

    9. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, almost right.

      Windows XP Embedded is exactly the same codebase as Windows XP, and is a componentized version of same. It is completely unrelated to either Windows PE (nee WinPE) or "BartPE". WinPE has nothing to do with XP Embedded. BartPE is simply a reverse engineering of WinPE - and as such also has nothing to do with XP Embedded.

      CE and NT forked source so long ago that undoubtedly many of the exploits that are in XP aren't in CE. And vice versa...

      It's also less about the way the component selection engine works, and more the fact that IE over time has actually established dependencies throughout the OS that numerous components do pull in IE. But it isn't rocket science to build a device image that would meet the needs of a simple ATM and not have IE in it. Quite easy, actually.

    10. Re:Yes, but... by f00zy · · Score: 1

      i think you said it. services. i can't imagine these people wouldn't strip it down to nothing. you're talking about money and lawsuits. the suits understand that. although maybe someday i'll get a buffer overflow in my favor...

    11. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just interviewed with Microsoft on a 'software developer in test' position for Longhorn. I was told there was a common core for most if not all (not sure about multiprocessor server farms) modern flavors of Windows.

      Having said that, of course I'm posting A/C.

    12. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're going to use Windows Embedded, not Windows XP. Two completely different code bases.

      Hell, at this point I don't care whether or not it runs windows, its the "web enabled" part that scares me.

    13. Re:Yes, but... by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since the vast bulk of security "problems" in XP come from end users downloading and installing spyware, I'm not sure why XP would be a problem in itself...

    14. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, the Internet Explorer code base is completely different from the Windows code base...

      The point is, Microsoft has a track record of security holes in all of it's software, Windows Embedded included.

    15. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you missed the grandparent post's sarcasm :)

    16. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooosh!!!

    17. Re:Yes, but... by fred911 · · Score: 1

      The vast majority if security issues with XP are from IE.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    18. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The NT Kernel is a very lean kernel, rivaling the Linux Kernel in many aspects. Both kernels have very few security and stability issues, although how secure and stable the system is doesn't depend entirely on the kernel, but what is ontop of the kernel (for the most part).

      Internet Explorer has very many security holes, but what makes them lethal is that they're tied right into kernel functions.

    19. Re:Yes, but... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Nearly all of Windows XP's security problems have been with services and applications sitting on top of the kernel rather than inside it.

    20. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's basically a componentized version of Windows PE...

      I read that as It's basically a computerized version of Windows PE.

    21. Re:Yes, but... by Baricom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TFA says these ATMs are web-based and Windows-based. That means they are almost certainly running the same rendering engine as Internet Explorer.

      I wouldn't trust Firefox in an ATM, let alone Internet Explorer. If my bank of choice starts deploying these in large quantities (they're around, but less prevalent than the old kind), I will run, not walk, to the competition.

    22. Re:Yes, but... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Not "completely different" though certainly more secure. It's my understanding that Embedded is just Windows without extra software like IE and Media Player and other "user experience" crap.

      Anyway, that still leaves us something to feel outraged about. If computer makers were allowed to use Embedded instead of XP on machines they sell, they could provide a high level of compatibility without shoving a lot of anti-competitive, low-security crap down users throats. But they can't. Forcing MS to remove this restriction ought to be a prime goal of any anti-trust zealots.

    23. Re:Yes, but... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Correct. More accurately, they're from running IE as an Administrator and visiting websites that exploit (either with or without the user's consent) IE.

      So since (presumably) these ATMs a) aren't going to be running as an admin user and b) aren't going to allow people using them to visit arbitrary websites that exploit IE (either with or without the user's consent), where are the security problems going to arise ?

    24. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong smart guy. Embedded is built on/from the NT code base, as you call it. Newer releases of embedded are based on XP, which is based on 2k, which is, you got it, based on NT. More accurately, it's the kernel we're talking here rather than an entire OS.

    25. Re:Yes, but... by Hoover,L+Ron · · Score: 1

      No they are the same code base. I know cause I just spent a week with an embedded guy who was helping our company with a XPe deployment and he also used to work for M$.

      The key diffences between Pro and XPe is that you can roll your own components through thier cheesy target designer, you can have as much or as little of the OS "Visible" as you want and they have an EWF filter that you can use to make the OS un-writable for stability.

      Otherwise it is the same stuff. In fact I recieve security alerts about the same time as they are announced for Pro.

      I don't exactly think XPe is taking the embedded world by storm. (However CE is a different story though) As there is only 2 commercially availble books even written on the subject. So you either hire someone for 2K per day to help, or you go to school for a week and pick it up there. That being said, I am amazed that they went this route when there must be other options availble.
    26. Re:Yes, but... by zootm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems unlikely that an ATM would be designed, or allowed, to run code which was not provided by those in charge of the ATM. The rendering engine is not a problem in this instance -- you're rendering code you've written yourself. These are not web browsers we're talking about, the application is much thinner.

    27. Re:Yes, but... by Baricom · · Score: 1

      Point taken. Isn't there some value in [partial] security by obscurity, though? I would bet most of the crackers who read Slashdot understand HTML and TCP/IP, but how many know what internal ATM protocols are called, let alone their vulnerabilities? I have a feeling the answer is "some, but not many." Also, it seems that having only a few people who know how to program the ATMs is better than any teller who happens to be a Computer Science undergraduate.

      I don't know what my bank's ATMs run as their operating system, and that's a good thing because it means the bad guys may not, either.

      (I'm not trying to troll, and I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about this.)

    28. Re:Yes, but... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Yeah and these things have html interfaces... that right there is enough to make me edgy. It's windows with an HTML interface, wonder what rendering engine they are using.

    29. Re:Yes, but... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      No, there is no value in security through obscurity. There is immense value in transparency. The bad guys are going to find the holes, obscure or not it is just a question of time. Hiding the code just makes things harder for the good guys.

    30. Re:Yes, but... by shaitand · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On another point, HTML and TCP/IP are HEAVILY stress tested. There are flaws but they are known and everybody and their dog has had a chance to work out flaws with them.

      The greatest possibility for one of these to get hacked is that the one admin is not really familiar with the system and makes a mistake on setup that leaves things functional but insecure. With HTML and TCP/IP the admin is more likely to be familiar and less like to make a mistake with the system.

      "I don't know what my bank's ATMs run as their operating system, and that's a good thing because it means the bad guys may not, either."

      The bad guys know in detail how the circuit processes the image of a dollar bill in a change machine so they can fool it. Do you? Of course not, they know because they have no scrupples and they want to know.

      Microsoft spends hundreds of billions of dollars writing custom and obscure protocols, deliberately designing every aspect of systems far more complex than these to be difficult to reverse engineer. It is the ultimate example of security through obscurity. And with MS it is what, 3-4yrs tops for their interfaces to be reverse engineered by hackers?

      You trust obscurity. I'll take a system that is easy to setup properly; is built on tried, true, tested, and stable technology (windows meets none of these critera embedded or not); and requires a bad guy to get past someone with a gun to get to the wire. If the bank wants to remote admin that is fine, they better use fiber links with quantum encryption, otherwise the cost is needed.

      I was once the technician at a small consulting firm trying to explain to a bank manager that he shouldn't have the network the bank terminals are on connected to the web and that a bank really should get something a tad more secure than norton internet security on their internet connection. In the end the bank just wanted something that said intrusion detection on the label to get the bank inspector off their back.

    31. Re:Yes, but... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      It seems unlikely that an ATM would be designed, or allowed, to run code which was not provided by those in charge of the ATM.

      Well, you could say something similar about Windows XP. It was designed to not run code which was not authorized by the user, yet Spyware has frequently been able to install itself without any help from the user. It's less common in WinXP SP2, but we have years and years of security problems in Windows products.

    32. Re:Yes, but... by zootm · · Score: 1
      (I'm not trying to troll, and I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about this.)
      Never thought you were! It seems unfortunate you'd start with such an assumption of attitudes. Just the internet I guess...

      I'd reply, but the sibling post beginning " On another point, HTML and TCP/IP are HEAVILY stress tested." answers your criticisms far better than I could see me doing myself. :)
    33. Re:Yes, but... by Ateryx · · Score: 1

      I really don't see the difference, Firefox has had a few holes, Windows boarded... up interent explorer.

      This ATM isn't going to be surfing for new ringtones, in addition it will probably be severely limited to its web capablities. Assuming that hurr-internet explorer bad-hurr and that massive black holes of security issues will be found is for the tin hats.

      Its like getting the most expensive swiss army knife, sure it has a fork and a tweezers included but that makes it less functional as a knife as opposed to a cheap knife only option. The knife only option will be much better at shanking than the bells and whistles tweezers knife because of the compromises that had to be made for space and strength holding the blade.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    34. Re:Yes, but... by zootm · · Score: 1

      Likewise Linux, OS/2, or whatever other general-purpose OS you feel like shoving onto an ATM. The fact is that if your system is on a secure network of some kind (which, if it isn't a legal requirement, should be a legal requirement), your system should be isolated from outside influence in any respect that matters here.

      As for the Spyware thing, it's trivially as easy to bundle a (single user) Adware product along with a Linux software package (and most other systems) as with a Windows one. I agree with your assertion that there's been problems in the past with some Windows products, but I don't think Windows Embedded has been any worse hit than any other comparable product. When a system has a limited use it is obviously far easier to protect it from malicious code.

    35. Re:Yes, but... by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Last time I used Windows embedded for something (3-4 years ago), I recall the version I was using was based on NT4.
      So, you'r implying this would be somehow better?

    36. Re:Yes, but... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      >So since (presumably) these ATMs a) aren't going to be running as an admin user

      This is irrelevant. The user that will be exploited has permission to read card numbers/PINs and dispense cash. I doubt hackers want to 0wn the ATMs and install Linux on them. They want ca$h.

      > b) aren't going to allow people using them to visit arbitrary websites that exploit IE (either with or
      > without the user's consent)

      Here's a scenario. The attacker with physical access to the ATM unplugs it and it reboots. He then taps the Ethernet cable (I doubt they're using quantum crypto + fiber here) and injects fake DNS replies. The ATM caches the (spoofed) IP adserver.bank.com as 1.2.3.4 (the attacker's webserver). The ATM loads an ad to show and is exploited with a malformed JPEG. The attacker now has a shell running as the ATM user and can do things like dispense some cash or maybe use another local vulnerability to get root and install a rootkit that sniffs packets after they have been decrypted.

      Oh.

      > where are the security problems going to arise ?

      From people that have a slightly-functional brain. Obviously we don't need to worry about you. :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    37. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no Windows XP Embedded is EXACTLY the same code base as Windows XP.

      And even if it wasn't, it would have been written by the same group of clueless idiots. Why would someone think Microsoft would write one crappy, hole-ridden OS, and also another bulletproof one?

    38. Re:Yes, but... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      This is irrelevant. The user that will be exploited has permission to read card numbers/PINs and dispense cash. I doubt hackers want to 0wn the ATMs and install Linux on them. They want ca$h.

      So where's your vector ? How are you planning to leverage this fact via IE ?

      Here's a scenario. The attacker with physical access to the ATM unplugs it and it reboots.

      You may was well have stopped here. Once an attacker has physical access just about everything at the software level becomes moot.

      If an attacker has access to carry out the scenario you outlined, then they'll be just as capable of using that same level of access to exploit just about anything an ATM is running.

    39. Re:Yes, but... by Rohan427 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The NT kernel is an unstable POS (tell all the admins out there that have spent many a weekend re-booting locked NT machines it's a lean kernel that rivals Linux). I would certainly not call it secure nor even close to rivaling the Linux (or any other modern) kernel.

      In addition, the NT kernel has far more lines of code than the Linux kernel (as does any Windows kernel since), embedded Windows is essentially the same as desktop Windows with fewer bells and whistles. The fact that the ATM system is written using a combination of C++, MFC, and uses a Web interface (which strongly implies embedded IE), makes the entire thing a cyber-bomb waiting to go off.

      That decides it for me. Time to research a new bank, and if there aren't any that don't use Windows based ATMs, then I won't use ATMs.

      PGA

    40. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, well, the Internet Explorer code base is completely different from the Windows code base...

      According to Microsoft the two are inseparable. IE *is* a part of Windows, it's not just them extending their monopoly. Really.

    41. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, most of the competition will likely also be heading this way as well. Which means one should really be running to the actual tellers and start costing the banks money in man-hours for tellers so they realize how much their choice of ATMs really cost them.

    42. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Bank Of American's ATM machines taken down because they were on w2k embedded?

    43. Re:Yes, but... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Surely the holes are in applications rather than the kernel itself. Since this isn't going to be running nearly as many services as XP ships out of the box, it ill be a lot less insecure. Nobody is going to be using IE or outlook on this.

    44. Re:Yes, but... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > You may was well have stopped here. Once an attacker has physical access just about everything at
      > the software level becomes moot.

      > If an attacker has access to carry out the scenario you outlined, then they'll be just as capable of
      > using that same level of access to exploit just about anything an ATM is running.

      Prove it. Go exploit an OS/2 ATM like this. Then try it with one running IE. I think you'll have an easier time with the IE ATM.

      --
      My other car is first.
    45. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a scenario. The attacker with physical access to the ATM unplugs it and just steals the whole fucking thing.

    46. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because analysts see how past trends have fallen doesn't mean they're 100% on mark 100% of the time.

      Yet you managed to catch the sarcasm in the post so deftly.

    47. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you missed the part where they said the UI is essentially a web page. That means IE.

      Besides, you can't use any useful services without getting IE as a dependency, so you're pretty screwed any way you look at it.

    48. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CE and NT forked source so long ago that undoubtedly many of the exploits that are in XP aren't in CE. And vice versa...

      I'm willing to bet a great deal of code has found its way across the divide anyway, so I woulnd't be so quick to make that assumption.

    49. Re:Yes, but... by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      No no no, there is tremendous value in security through obscurity! Your front door is an example: most mechanical locks

      The problem with it is that sometimes people assume that is enough in a situation when it isn't.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    50. Re:Yes, but... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's only going to be connected to trusted sites though. It should be safe.

      And you don't need any useful services.

    51. Re:Yes, but... by dotcher · · Score: 1

      The NT kernel is pretty damned clean and stable, from what I know of it - it's a reimplementation of VMS, basically.

      Everything built ontop of it isn't, though - and that includes things like the Win32 API, much of which is implemented via kernel-mode drivers for speed. That's where a lot of the problem is.

      Whilst Windows deserves a fair amount of the slamming it gets, NT is a nice kernel. It's a pity that you can't use it without running Windows ontop of it.

    52. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's toss a coin on that...

    53. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always microsoft=hacked.. that's crap, Linux has it's share too, maby the hacks are'nt as popular right now but as Linux gets more mainstream, programmers will just program for linux vulnerabilities. How hard is that for the fanboys to understand??

    54. Re:Yes, but... by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Hiding the code just makes things harder for the good guys.

      Your assumption that there is a big band of 'good guys' who spend their nights poring over the source code for ATM applications is laughable.

      As is your suggestion that the ATM vendors would happily accept patches from said imaginary band of 'good guys.'

      Face it, the Open Source religion works in certain spheres only.

    55. Re:Yes, but... by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      It's said that someone rated the parent post as "Informative" when it's entirely inaccurate:

      The code-bases for XP embedded and XP Pro are IDENTICAL. The binaries for both of these OSs are IDENTICAL. The only difference is that with XPe you get to choose which binaries/config (i.e components) are put on the hard drive image.

      The only way XPe is more secure than XP Pro is that you can create a smaller image with less components. For example, you can use HTML and other "web content" components and not install any of the RPC or "windows file sharing" disasters.

    56. Re:Yes, but... by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      What about this scenario:

      A hacker disconnects the Ethernet cable and plugs in his laptop. He follows the DNS scam as mentioned by a previous poster. He spends the next 4 hours getting root access and puts on a fake shell! While packing up his geek toys, a truck drives through store front and just removes the ATM so they can cut into it later and steal the cash!

      See how insecure Windows is!!! Couldn't have happened with OS/2...

    57. Re:Yes, but... by Bri3D · · Score: 1

      Embedded is the exact same as Windows XP Professional with selectable components. If you tried hard enough you could make a "real" XP Pro with XP embedded.

    58. Re:Yes, but... by tshak · · Score: 1

      Because most or Microsoft's security problems are related to usability or app integration features which are great features for many users (read, not typical /. crowd) if security wasn't a concern. Windows embedded doesn't do ActiveX, Office Integration, etc., and is therefore much more secure.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    59. Re:Yes, but... by lgw · · Score: 1

      I've been working with the NT kernel since 3.51. I've never seen an actual kernel problem - ever. Plenty of blue screens and lock-ups from driver issues over the years, both from MS and 3rd party drivers, but never an actual kernel problem.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    60. Re:Yes, but... by lgw · · Score: 1

      There is especially no value in security through obscurity on a private network, where anyone who knows enough to even begin hacking it probably has access to the docs.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    61. Re:Yes, but... by lgw · · Score: 1

      > where are the security problems going to arise ?

      From people that have a slightly-functional brain. Obviously we don't need to worry about you. :)


      Existing non-Windows ATMs have been stolen, rooted, and put back into service to capture cards and PIN numbers. How does Windows change this exactly? It's easier to be snarky than right, I guess.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    62. Re:Yes, but... by Baricom · · Score: 1

      You trust obscurity. I'll take a system that is easy to setup properly; is built on tried, true, tested, and stable technology (windows meets none of these critera embedded or not); and requires a bad guy to get past someone with a gun to get to the wire.

      I merely trust obscurity backed by sound security practices over the sound security practices alone.

    63. Re:Yes, but... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      I spent a few days at a customer's in Germany watching two guys from n.runs take apart a highly proprietary medical system.

      It was the most awe-inspiring thing I've ever seen--these guys went through it like a hot knife through butter, starting from _zero_ knowledge of the box. In the process, they even found solutions to a few bugs which had been annoying the actual support & development staff for ages.

      They essentially spent a few hours playing with the system, finding enormous amounts of horrible shit security-wise based on what looked like a pretty superficial audit--their plan was to spend the rest of the week they were scheduled to be there to learn that manufacturer's cpu architecture, to be able to "audit" SAN components based on the same hardware in the future.

      So no, obscurity is not necessarily a bad thing, if it does not replace real security (which you simply cannot realistically achieve without the kind of peer review accomplished by having a reasonably open architecture, so there's your catch-22.)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  4. Putting ATMs on the Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Putting ATMs on the Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submitted this with a much funnier headline.

      Well... I didn't really submit it. But at least now we trail Fark by only 7 hours!

    2. Re:Putting ATMs on the Web by phaetonic · · Score: 1

      Oblig. Simpsons Reference:

      Itchy and Scratchy Land Pilot : What could possibli go wrong?
      Itchy and Scratchy Land Pilot : (pause)
      Itchy and Scratchy Land Pilot : Why, that's the first thing thats ever gone wrong.

  5. Why! by bstadil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I RTFA and have no idea why they did this. OS/2 is not EOL'ed yet. Methinks someone did a snow job on thiese guys.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Why! by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IBM has been discouraging people from using OS/2 for a while, and will certainly EOL it as soon as people stop paying the legacy support contracts. I can't imagine why someone would want to build a new product on it.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    2. Re:Why! by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

      If they could get by with all their existing ATM's, it wouldn't be a problem. The problem is that they need to install new ones, both in new locations and to replace aging equipment that's failing.

      Diebold (the #1 maker of ATM's) doesn't sell an OS/2 based ATM anymore, which means if you want new ones, you're stuck with Windows.

    3. Re:Why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a lot of their larger machines (sorters and such) they sell today come with OS/2, and require workstations that interface with them running OS/2 as well.

    4. Re:Why! by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      That's not much consolation because IBM can support OS/2 internally even after it's been EOLed, or they can just stockpile enough old OS/2 workstations to last until the apocolypse.

      OTOH, if OS/2 becomes incompatible with the new Pentium VI or whatever, any OS/2 reseller would be screwed without "support".

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    5. Re:Why! by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      How do you figure? In the quantities that an ATM manufacturer buys it would be no problem for them to order (or build) any CPU they need for the forseeable future.

      You don't need a PentiumVI to run an ATM, chances are a 386 will more then do the trick for a text interface, and a 386 with a reasonably fast graphics card will do the trick for a GUI version of the ATM.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    6. Re:Why! by carlislematthew · · Score: 1
      I would hate to be the guy running the development group. Imagine the job posting on Moster:

      ATM development group seeks legacy OS/2 developer to work on old ATM systems using legacy UI libraries. Candidates with no ambition are preferred. We pay lots of money because if you want this job, you're the only one out there.

  6. Hello, I am Govermet Minster by tbuckner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gretings, I am Govermet Minster of Nigeria, and if you send me your PIN you wil share 20% of 1.3 milion American US dolars that I must retrive. THis wil only take a moment since you are already at your ATM.

    1. Re:Hello, I am Govermet Minster by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 2, Funny

      This must be my lucky day! As you already have my ATM card information, once I enter my PIN you'll know that too, but just in case you don't recieve it, it's 7843. I eagerly await your deposit!

      Thanks!
      John Q. Public

      --
      All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
  7. choice quote by Neophytus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We want to make sure our ATMs are integrated with every other channel so when I do a deposit in a [branch] I want to be able to go to [an] ATM immediately and see that deposit"

    I do that regularly anyway. An ATM doesn't have to be on "the net" to do that. It has to communicate to the central handling server regardless of it's OS.

    1. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a ridiclous story. Using a SOAP/XML-based protocol is not "web enabling".

    2. Re:choice quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They may say they want to do that, but in reality they'd never make deposits immediately available like that. Aside from holding your deposit for a few days so they can make interest off of it as well as whatever bounced check fees they can get from you, they wouldn't post the money to the account until they had someone go out there, clean out the ATM, and look to make sure the money you claimed you put in there really was in the envelope.

    3. Re:choice quote by rsmoody · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Most ATM's are frame relay and are ONLY directly connected to the bank's system, in the case of the bank I work for a Stratus system. We could have done TCP/IP, but didn't. Even over TCP/IP, they still would not have been on the open internet, only on the banks private T1 line.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:choice quote by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Just curious - is there any connection between ATMs and ATM networking, or is the common name a complete coincidence?

    5. Re:choice quote by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      ATM here is Automated Teller Machine.

      ATM in networking is Asynchronous Transfer Mode.

      They aren't linked

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    6. Re:choice quote by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      huh?

      If your bank isn't already doing this, you should either change banks or start paying your bills and build up a credit rating equal to that of a common dog.

      By the time I was 15 my bank would immediately honour up to $500/day worth of deposits, and up to $1500 of "uncleared" deposits would be available to me as of 6PM the following business day after the transaction.

      In other words, I can insert an empty envelope and get up to $500. Once they verify that I inserted something resembling cash or a cheque, I can get up to $1500.

      Of course I've had an ATM card since I was 12, never deposited a bad cheque when I didn't have sufficient funds to cover it after it bounced, never bounced a cheque I've written, all that.

      My roommates, on the other hand, still have to wait 5 business days for cheques to clear. Why? Because of R9 credit ratings (well, one of them, anyway)

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    7. Re:choice quote by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      "We want to make sure our ATMs are integrated with every other channel so when I do a deposit in a [branch] I want to be able to go to [an] ATM immediately and see that deposit"

      That is a misquote, the reporter, as is so typical with the press, misunderstood and then rewrote his misunderstanding for "clarity."

      What he really said is:

      "We want to make sure our ATMs are integrated with every other IRC channel so when I command my army of zombie robot ATMs, I can go to my target's ATM immediately and see the money drain from his account.

      "We have previously tested this technology in the field with our automated voting machines and it worked very well, succesfully draining over 10% of the votes cast."

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  8. tested by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 1

    these are the type of applications where the OS would be really tested. And finally who will be responsible if people loose precious money because of some kid running a 10 line worm? But did they have an option? No. The corporates have to embrace technology to have the edge in competition. And for such an application what will they choose? Windows which is known to have security holes or Linux which might have unreported flaws and methodologies that is patented my Microsoft?

    1. Re:tested by kkassing · · Score: 1

      Well, why not think outside of the box and have it run on OSX?

    2. Re:tested by rco3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So.... we can either use an OS that we KNOW has security problems, or we can use one that MIGHT have security problems. We can use an OS famous for crashes and instability (BMW's iDrive?) and limited platform availability, or one which runs solidly and reliably on damn near any hardware we want. We can use an OS whose source code is a secret and which we cannot review or analyze, or we can use an OS whose source code is completely open and available for review. We can use an OS who has lost a major IP lawsuit and is hoping to win on appeal (EOLAS v. Microsoft, which I frankly hope MS wins) or an OS which is on the verge of winning a major IP lawsuit and crushing the litigious bastards who filed it out of existence (SCO). Or we could use a BSD.

      In any case, it's hard to justify the use of any flavor of Windows on technical grounds. Not when security is a primary concern, which it is if the ATMs are handling MY money. But when were technical issues ever the deciding factor? No, it'll some PHB who doesn't understand or care about the tech who makes the decision based on some saleshole stroking him/her just right...

      Of course, that's just my opinion.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    3. Re:tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That would be awesome. It would double apple's market share overnight!

    4. Re:tested by QMO · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does OSX run outside the box?

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    5. Re:tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "And finally who will be responsible if people loose precious money because of some kid running a 10 line worm?"

      "Lose" is the opposite of "gain" (or "win").
      "Loose" is the opposite of "tight".
      You should have learned this somewhere around third grade.

    6. Re:tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you mean 'loose' or 'lose'? Work out how to pronouce each and have a think about it...

    7. Re:tested by Fex303 · · Score: 1
      "And for such an application what will they choose? Windows which is known to have security holes or Linux which might have unreported flaws and methodologies that is patented my Microsoft?"

      So you're saying that Microsoft's numerous, consistently exploited, well-publicised security holes are actually evidence that Windows is secure?

      Interesting...

    8. Re:tested by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Well, why not think outside of the box and have it run on OSX?

      Preliminary testing with OSX found that the shiny translucent plastic ATM faceplates were far too susceptible to scratching and scuffing for use in the field.

    9. Re:tested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what use is an ATM with only one mouse button?

  9. But why? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know why the ATMs would be any more useful because they have been web-enabled? Perhaps people wish to do online banking at the kiosk?

    Then again, it could just be for ads.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:But why? by Gilesx · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I don't know what the situation is like in the US, but I end up frequently lining up to use my home bank's ATMs. The last thing I need is some idiot stood there for 10 minutes logging on to check that his electricity bill was paid this month.

      --
      Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
  10. Change required because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else could OS/2 download the latest and greatest malware? http://it.slashdot.org/it/05/03/05/196247.shtml?ti d=172&tid=218/

  11. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  12. Atleast Ill be gone by golfsportila · · Score: 0

    I'll be moving away from where there are wells fargo's fairly soon anyway, so I don't think I'll have to worry about "hacked" atms because they run windows :)

  13. Change Banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good thing I don't bank with them...otherwise I'd be switching banks right about now.

    Its kind of like going into a plane...if I looked into the cockpit and saw Windows booting, I'd walk straight off the plane and ask for my money back.

    NEVER NEVER trust anything mission-critical of financial based to something as problem-prone as a Microsoft product.

  14. Not a good thing for bank users .... by DARKFORCE123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not a great move. Try and search for 0S/2 exploits even with Google. You're not going to find tons. I sure don't want to use an ATM running Windows and IE where someone that use the security expoit(s) of the month on it.

    Search on Windows security exploits and display the results and oh ... darn I hope this gets submitted because my browser crashed when all the results came back.

  15. What are we waiting for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to exploit one of the holes to get free cash, or even better, install firefox on the ATM?

  16. Network Security? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Ok, Windows has a bad (OK, awful) record on bugs and security, but if it's on a secure network then what's the worry? Doesn't strike me as any worse than others.

    Now if they aren't one a secure network, or it gets cracked somehow (even an inside helper) then it could be like that Richard Pryor thing in Superman II (or was it III?) where he pilfers a cent here and there and nobody's the wiser until he pulls up in the parking lot in an expensive sportscar on a cheapass wage.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Network Security? by magefile · · Score: 1

      It was Superman III. Don't you remember Office Space (yes, it's true - that's my only source. I never saw Superman III)?

    2. Re:Network Security? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      When CodeRed hit banks got infected as well. Their internal security isn't that great it seems (eg. they hadn't applied security updates, weren't running their webservers a secure DMZ, etc.).

      I wouldn't trust a web enabled ATM not to get hit by the next worm.

    3. Re:Network Security? by matthewg42 · · Score: 1

      That's what they thought about the Nuclear power station networks that had to fail over to old analogue systems because of a windows worm...

      IIRC there was some something to do with a contractor who left their connection to the private network open to abuse from the outside.

      P.S. When is Bush going to learn how to say "nuclear" properly? I bet he says "par cark" too.

    4. Re:Network Security? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      We don't use the term "car park" in the US. I'm willing to be Bush has never had the need to say "car park" (or "par cark").

      --
      My other car is first.
    5. Re:Network Security? by matthewg42 · · Score: 1

      OK then, "larking pot" ;)

  17. mod insightful by taxman_10m · · Score: 4, Funny

    They can't all be fake, and I have a good feeling about this one.

  18. RTFA, no sense by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    This makes no sense, ATMs are already all 'on a network' - what more do they want? why would a 'Windows infrastructure' be better for updating them? why do you even need windows (lowercase) in an ATM - a device with only one program and one thing on screen at a time?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:RTFA, no sense by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      ADA - modern soundcard (and other hardware!) support?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:RTFA, no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash-based advertisments for car loans.

    3. Re:RTFA, no sense by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Troll

      whats it going to do? play beethovens 9th in 5.1 surround while demoing unreal tourney 2006 as you wait for your card to clear? if they're going to update cash machines id rather they come up with better designs to stop people fitting false fronts, increased privacy from shoulder surfing, gave more detailed receipts and statement printouts, let me cancel cheques and direct debits, and sped the whole thing up so people could use them faster, oh or maybe they could use the hardware cost saving to double the number of machines?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    4. Re:RTFA, no sense by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Why do you think there's braille on the keyboard?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    5. Re:RTFA, no sense by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      flash runs on linux

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  19. Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by nilbog · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wells Fargo is moving to windows so they can run video on the ATM screens. They want to run traileras and MSNBC tickers. OS/2 doesn't have that capability.


    It's good too, because I needed a place to see MSNBC tickers and movie trailers and also get money at the same time.


    Now that this has rolled out on all Wells Fargo ATM's, they will allow you to watch full movies on them and will be opening concession stands. If you pull up to an ATM, and the car in front of you has the windows all fogged up ... it might be a while.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "It's good too, because I needed a place to see MSNBC tickers and movie trailers and also get money at the same time."

      If advertising revenue at ATMs prevents new fees from occuring, I say more power to them. As it is, I find it absolutely irritating that if I withdraw from an ATM my bank doesn't own, I have to pay the owner of the ATM *and* the bank a fee.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by ethx1 · · Score: 1

      If advertising revenue at ATMs prevents new fees from occuring, I say more power to them. As it is, I find it absolutely irritating that if I withdraw from an ATM my bank doesn't own, I have to pay the owner of the ATM *and* the bank a fee.


      Yeah but I doubt that will happen. You'll still get charged and have to watch the ads.

    3. Re:Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by vladest · · Score: 1

      OS/2 has such capabilities. There is 2 solutions: hardware from diebold and software from Inlan (http://www.inlan.com.ua). Software solution support MPEG movies on Intel Pentium 233MMX up to 320x288 and a lot of other video formats

    4. Re:Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by lgw · · Score: 1

      If your bank charges you to use other banks' ATMs , change banks (or at least account types). Most banks will waive the fee on their side if you either have direct deposit or a small minimum balance. Some banks will even take care of the fee the other bank charges you, if they like you enough.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Well Fargo Drive in Movies! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  20. Encryption and visibility by LemonFire · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that they encrypt the data traffic to and from the ATM machine :) , however making it easier for hackers/crackers to listen in to the communication sounds like a really bad idea to me.

    Just because you have a safe car, it doesn't meant that you drive it without the safety belt on. It sounds to me that they're almost asking for it.

    I'm sure we have security experts here on /. to tell us all about this.

    -- This SIG is encrypted

    1. Re:Encryption and visibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are kidding yourself to think that the ATM communication is already and always encrypted. The government mandates only that your PIN be encrypted within the entire transaction. When most articles talk about "DESDESDES" encryption, they are only talking about how the PIN is encrypted.

      This is not secret or proprietary information. Do some research for "automated teller machine message format"

      Come visit Brazil - use linux-based ATMs!

  21. say what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The San Francisco-based bank said it also installed more than 3,000 online stations in nearly all of its 6,046 branch locations.

    Am I the only one to get that each ATM is shared between two branches?


    ...and offer the highest level of security the bank has had to date.

    How are those Windows patches going to be deployed? Hmm... Wonder if they have a usb accessible to download an XML dump of my transactions... Wonder if auto-run has been turned off...



    ATM's don't need a fancy gui... just a keypad with a few buttons would surfice. Kinda reminds me of the electronic voting problems with Windows, while in India, they used embedded computers, hard-coded, four buttons to a pad, without any problems.

  22. What kind of distorted view do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    web != tightly controlled internal network
    web = subset of the internet connected through hyperlinks

    1. Re:What kind of distorted view do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      web == subset of the internet connected through hyperlinks :)

    2. Re:What kind of distorted view do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, web = subset of a network. A NETWORK, not THE INTERNET.
      World Wide Web = subset of a global network.
      The Internet = The only public global network

    3. Re:What kind of distorted view do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your parent was talking about the "web" in "web-enabled", which obviously refers to the WWW. (You really think that some company touting a, say, "web-enabled warranty lookup system" could get away with a lookup system accessible only from its private network?!)

  23. Local AMC theater self serve ticket machines Win98 by RichMan · · Score: 1

    The local AMC 24 multiplex movie theatre self serve movie ticket terminals run Windows 98. There was one stuck at its boot screen at one point. Also I have seen the familair blue several times. These machines handle Debit transactions with a PIN number and credit card transactions without a PIN.

    Security does not seem to be a big issue on closed networks. At least I hope it is a closed network.

  24. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you turn on the networking, you can bet a lot of the SMB-based Windows hacks would work on OS/2 because it was the same codebase. Nobody can be arsed to check tho.

  25. Ok..So who's got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an IP address for me?

    1. Re:Ok..So who's got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet... An email address for the CEO.. I've got a dandy little program that would just love to infect the entire network, all those branch PC's and ATM's running Windows... :)

  26. You can do something about it by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    Find a bank doesn't have IT department getting sort of bribes from Microsoft and switch to it.

    Its easy. Go to bank, tell you want to close your account, if you are asked "why" in form etc, write "windows"

  27. Two words... by Grandmaster+Mort · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Bad Idea (TM)

    If it isn't broke, then don't fix it.

    --
    si vis pacem, para bellum..."if you wish peace, prepare for war"
  28. rofl... bwahahahahah... by pb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone else remember the end of Sneakers? Because that's what this reminds me of. I'm just thinking about the potential news headlines...

    "Wells-Fargo reportedly went bankrupt yesterday. Company spokesman: 'The money... it just disappeared...'
    In other news, the EFF is reporting record donations!"

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
    1. Re:rofl... bwahahahahah... by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      Dude, Sneakers _just finished_ on ITV here in the UK! Weird.....

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
  29. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 4, Informative

    While it's unlikely that these machines are actually on the internet, but if they are it's probably not a big deal anyways. They'd likely be using some kind of hardware VPN, and even if they weren't they are most likely shutting off all external ports other than their own software, making it no more vulnerable than any other OS they might choose. No open ports, no way to exploit it.

  30. Netscape by danimrich · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple of weeks ago I saw an ATM that had crashed. It was running Netscape on some version of Windows.
    Surely enough, it was made by the same manufacturer who f***ed up US voting machines. I do have some pictures if anyone is interested.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
    1. Re:Netscape by tajmorton · · Score: 1

      I've got hosting for the pictures (e.g., it can probably withstand a slashdotting). If you're interested, just let me know, taj at wildgardenseed dot com.

      --
      Tell the truth and you won't have so much to remember.
    2. Re:Netscape by hairykrishna · · Score: 3, Funny
      That's nothing. Check out this one displaying windows media player:

      http://midnightspaghetti.com/newsDiebold.php

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    3. Re:Netscape by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 1

      That's the same ATM my local branch just put in to replace their old one!
      The "contact us" form on the manufaturer's site doesn't even tab around correctly, jumps around box to box really oddly.

      --
      All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
    4. Re:Netscape by generic-man · · Score: 3, Informative

      Diebold has been making ATMs long before they acquired a company that makes voting machines.

      Of course, their old ATMs were relatively reliable although they couldn't run Windows Media Player.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Netscape by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've seen ATMs with BSOD on them. This demonstrates several things. First, there's no attempt at building a fault-tolerent system. If it crashes, it crashes and there's nothing to it but to wait until an engineer reboots it.


      Second, it proves that there's no kind of high-availability, hardware watchdog, or other automagic restart system. These are minimal boxes, not solidly-built ones.


      Third, it proves that the interest is in producing the most ATMs at the lowest initial cost, not in producing the best ATMs for the best long-term cost.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your first two points make sense from a security standpoint. Why add automatic rebooting and give one more way to exploit the system? If something weird happens, fail-safe and wait for an engineer.

      As for your third point, I'm not sure how these ATMs are going to cost much money in the long run.

    7. Re:Netscape by Corngood · · Score: 1

      I've seen ATMs with BSOD on them. This demonstrates several things. First, there's no attempt at building a fault-tolerent system. If it crashes, it crashes and there's nothing to it but to wait until an engineer reboots it.

      And if there was a hardware fault? Could that not cause a BSOD?

    8. Re:Netscape by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That is possible, but hardware faults are less likely than software faults. Either way, you don't want the computer up and running in an uncontrolled state.


      Generally, what you want is a known state - fully running or fully shut down. The most trivial way to do this is to have a hardware system that keeps a timer running. If the time to the next crash exceeds some pre-defined mark, you assume it is a software bug and reboot. If it happens before that mark, it is likely a hardware problem and you shut down all power and put the system into a locked-down mode.


      A "better" solution would be to have a monitoring system checking sensors, memory levels, etc, maybe running occasional hardware checks. If the hardware looks flaky, it would be easy enough for such a system to notify maintenance before there is a problem, cutting downtime due to hardware issues to nearly zero.


      Likewise, if the machine is idle but the OS is leaking memory like a sieve, it would be trivial for such a monitor to do a preventitive reboot.


      Hardware sensors are built into most lines of chips and devices. Diagnostic tests can be downloaded for free or are relatively trivial to write. Hardware watchdog cards are plentiful and you can get software ones for most Operating Systems.


      I don't understand the mindset of companies that brag about great uptimes (but invariably never deliver) when it would actually work out cheaper to have uptimes that were so good, you wouldn't need to brag about them at all. An ounce of real value is always better than a pund of bullshit - unless you're planting roses, and even then horseshit is generally considered superior.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Netscape by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      Yep, we use the same ones at work. Diebolds, running Windows 2000. I've seen the machine open a few times, there's some old computer case sitting in the bottom...

    10. Re:Netscape by danimrich · · Score: 1

      OK guys, it seems as if a lot of people are interested in the pictures, so I put them online.

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    11. Re:Netscape by danimrich · · Score: 1

      just look here: http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0203763/atm.html

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    12. Re:Netscape by slasar · · Score: 1

      I like your sig, very cool :-)

  31. Lawsuit by a_greer2005 · · Score: 1

    If the atm systems get hacked because of this move, could the customers sue for losses and punitive damages? after all, useing windows on a banking system is like leaveing the door open at Fort Knox, inviteing the crime.

    1. Re:Lawsuit by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      no, but when the bank/atm manufactures sue the hell out of the hacker and each-other, you can rest assured that the savings won't be passed on to you, the customer.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Lawsuit by vic128 · · Score: 1

      i think thats the point of being FDIC insured.

  32. s-l-o-w ATM keypad by anadem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    am I the only one who finds the new Wells Fargo ATM key response time to be laggardly?

    After I enter my pin, the beep sound and the asterisk that's displayed take so long that I think i've miskeyed, so press again getting a double entry which i have to cancel and slowly and carefully retry.

    Is it because of being Windowized, or just bad programming? The old OS/2 ATMs responded instantly.

    1. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Dunno about Wells Fargo, but all the banks in the UK have been going to these "richer client experience" terminals.

      Like you I have noticed that the time required to log-in to the ATM has increased. It sucks, but I don't think it's something we can get changed.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      I agree - these new Diebold WF ATMs totally suck. Furthermore, they changed the workflow so it's now impossible to deposit and get cash in the same transaction.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    3. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bank of America "upgraded" their ATMs to surround their interface with graphics, and to add animated movies (with sound!) between operations.

      But recently they came to their senses. Now it's big white letters over a black background (like an old terminal), no cruft. Maybe this was caused by the elderly who had problems parsing all these pixels, but anyway, thank you for reverting to an old fashioned ATM. But how much money was wasted on the eye-candy experiment?

    4. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it because of being Windowized, or just bad programming? The old OS/2 ATMs responded instantly.
      The modern PED is a physically and logically self contained tamper-resistant unit that encrypts a PIN within milliseconds of its entry, and within centimeters of the customer's fingertips. The plaintext PIN never leaves the unit
      - http://www.securityfocus.com/news/9161
      I doubt the PED, which is the part of the ATM that handles PIN entry, is also windows based. The problem is likely just bad programming.
    5. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by markxz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dunno about Wells Fargo, but all the banks in the UK have been going to these "richer client experience" terminals.

      This is most noticeable on the older ATMs that were upgraded to newer animated software (The Clydesdale Bank machines seem to be the worst) where there is a noticeable time lag between button presses.

      I think part of the slowness is due to the new 'chip and pin' bank cards in which the machine has to talk to the chip, rather than just read the data from the card.

    6. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      probably programming adhering to spec 'too well'.

      you know, the programmer had a spec sheet describing the exact process(made in some meeting, with discussion going like "how long can there be delay between keypresses registering? how about a second? or something? let's put that there shall we. what's next on the list?"), including maximum times and maybe even minimum amounts of delay there should/could be between keypresses. then the programmer didn't think of it at all, or had no choice but to adhere to the spec even if it was stupid at places.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Interesting

      am I the only one who finds the new Wells Fargo ATM key response time to be laggardly?

      I dunno the make of the new ATMs around here, but you are not alone.

      It is incredibly annoying to have the "beep" of a pressed key come as I'm one or two keypresses further along. I have to stop and wait for all the beeps to catch up, look closely at the screen, make sure it's all ok. Very, very annoying. I'm thinking of changing banks just to save me the frustration.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    8. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by WillerZ · · Score: 1
      I think part of the slowness is due to the new 'chip and pin' bank cards in which the machine has to talk to the chip, rather than just read the data from the card.


      In my experience with chip & PIN for buying stuff it takes about as long between me hitting enter and the transaction completing as it used to between the cashier hitting "yes the signatures match" and the transaction completing.


      Yes, there may be a little more overhead for chip & PIN, but that doesn't explain the lag when al you're doing is typing the amount you want to withdraw.


      On that subject, why is it that most of the machines now require me to enter 50.00 rather than 50? Is there an ATM anywhere in the country which will dole out amounts in units of less than £5 at a time.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    9. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Jerf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh god, not another one.

      In 2005, you should not have a perceptible delay between keypress and a simple ack. response like putting up an asterisk.

      The problem, of course, is not technology. It's this god-damned "save every fraction of a penny at all costs, and fuck the customer/user!" mentality. A couple of cents more per terminal is probably all it would take to eliminate the delay, but, well, like I said, fuck the user.

      I can't use Comcast digital cable boxes because of the multi-second delay before button presses react. (That one boggles the mind, I think they had to work to make it suck that bad.) It pisses me off that in the time it takes to navigate to one On Demand movie, the value of my time for the time it took to do the navigation would have been sufficient to make a snappy, responsive system. You could quite literally rack up hours spent just waiting for their interface to update in a year if you actually tried to use it (from what I gather from the way they keep dropping the price on On-Demand things, nobody does), and that says they care so little about my time that they'd rather save 5 cents.

      Normally, I don't much care about "bloat" in desktop computers, I think most people bitching about it don't really understand what that "bloat" is buying them. But in the embedded space, fire away with your "bloat" accusations. The work it takes to make a machine in 2005 react more slowly than a machine from 1970, no exaggeration, boggles the mind.

      Fuckers.

    10. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I had this problem with the debit card reader at a Best Buy today. They use a crummy touch interface instead of actual keys, which failed to register some of the "keypresses" for my PIN.

      So I hit clear, and tried to re-enter the number. When I went to do this, it doesn't register anything. Press, press, press, press, press. Still nothing. I ask the cashier, she shrugs. Suddenly, all the keypresses appear. So we rang it up as a credit card sale. What a POS that POS system is..

    11. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by aduxorth · · Score: 1

      Its probably because of all the spyware, keyloggers, trojans, that found their way onto it.
      They probably also installed norton antivirus to be on the safe side.

      The combination of all/any of those peices of software, generally slow any windows machine (regardless of PC power) to a crawl.

    12. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this was caused by the elderly who had problems parsing all these pixels

      Maybe they shouldn't of been showing seizure inducing cartoons

    13. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Is there an ATM anywhere in the country which will dole out amounts in units of less than £5 at a time.

      It's been a number of years since I last saw a machine that would give out less than a tenner at a time, let alone less than a fiver...

      I agree with you though - the new chiped cards cannot possibly be responsible for time delay between pressing a key and it registering on-screen. The machine will be checking the PIN at the point that you press Enter/Accept, not with each key press (unless the programmer is completely stupid...)

    14. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is the stupid attitude that atms need flashy animations are complex interface, when the good old green screen terminal like like interface worked just fine. a bank doesn't need branding on their atm interface, I already know which bank I'm getting money from.

    15. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 1

      The hi-def Comcast box isn't nearly as bad as the standard box. Doesn't even cost any more per month to get one!

    16. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by EXrider · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's not just Wells Fargo ATM's, that's all Diebold ATM's. There's one by my work in a Shell station, I actually drive two blocks farther down the road to use a different ATM just because that one sucks sooo bad. I've never timed it, but even with all the extra driving, I still think it's faster overall.

      After you get done entering in all the laggy key strokes, it then procedes to call 3, yes 3 different locations, all the while it plays loud dialing sounds and modem carrier sounds for everyone in the place to hear (it's a 28.8 handshake). I know they use encryption, but wouldn't it be possible to record the sound on a tape recorder, then take it home and demodulate it, then work on breaking the encryption?!

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    17. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by stungod · · Score: 1

      You are certainly not the only one. Those new ATM's drive me crazy. There is aboslutely no reason that should have made it into production as-is. It has to be about a half-second between a keypress and the response from the machine.

      But that's just the beginning. The real menace if the damned touch screen interface. A little calibration would go a long way, not to mention that you get the same response time from the screen as you do from the keypad. I don't know how tall their QA people are, but because of the distance between the screen and the outside of the glass a tall person is guaranteed to press the wrong button on-screen. I miss all the time, but don't know because of the delay in feedback. At least they make it semi-convenient to put back all the extra money you didn't really mean to withdraw. Unless WF isn't your bank.

      I reckon it's nice that they can send out updates remotely to these ATM's. God knows that wasn't possible with "less advanced" OS'es. I guess we'll just have to see how long before some kid at home sends out his new update package. Or until WF works out a deal with Gator to serve pop-up ads while you wait for the stupid thing to register keypresses.

    18. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by bluGill · · Score: 1

      but wouldn't it be possible to record the sound on a tape recorder, then take it home and demodulate it, then work on breaking the encryption?!

      Sure, but I'll save you the trouble: it is standard 3DES encryption. Though expect them to start moving to AES soon. There is also some standard public key cryptography and replay prevention. (so you can't play the same bit sequence back and get it to spit out money) Standard algorithms in cryptography.

      If you manage to break them you won't have a hard time getting millions from one of several countries for the secret - more than the machine holds, and you don't take a chance that the cops recognize you from the video tapes.

    19. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by lgw · · Score: 1

      OTOH, if the bank had a QA team (as opposed to just testers) they would have balked at this, spec or no spec. Makes you wonder if there was a QA team at all.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:s-l-o-w ATM keypad by EXrider · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's probably a good idea to simply change the init string for the modem so it shuts up after the handshake. It's those kind of non-attention to detail things (hearing the modem, laggy key strokes, annoying flashing advertisements, recipt coming out 30 seconds after the transaction, calling 3 different places, etc.) that make me really question the quality of Diebold's products (and/or that bank's implementation of them).

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
  33. What could possibly go wrong? by Renraku · · Score: 3, Funny

    Stolen from Fark.

    "Wells Fargo Web-Enables ATMs. Hilarity ensues."

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  34. is "Windows Embedded" = "Windows for Warships"? by ankhank · · Score: 1

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/09/06/ams_goes_w indows_for_warships/

    Security?

  35. My ATM had crashed - UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I went to the hole in the wall (ATM) and it was displaying a windows taskbar, a dos window with some process running with a dos full stop sequence progress meter and another McAfee window - I asked in the bank and they said it had been on and off all morning and an "engineer" was trying to fix it.

    I remember a /. article on UK banks going ove to windoze but I never thought i'd see the day.

    Was I ever laughing.

    I wonder if my atm card has a virus by now. ;-)

    PS It was Bank of Scotland

    Well I guess an OS and their money are easyily restarted.

    1. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by gibbsjoh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've seen this a few times, twice in the past few months at the Nationwide in Langley, Berks.. it was Windows NT IIRC.

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    2. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by Cerv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PS It was Bank of Scotland
      I've seen a BSOD on one of their machines before. Annoying since the branch was closed and the nearest other machine was in completely the opposite direction to where I was going.

      --
      sig
    3. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      Man, a few weeks back there were all sorts of rumors that RBS was going to buy the bank I work for. Now I REALLY hope they were just rumors! ;-)

    4. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by Iason+Baldes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My friend had an atm crash on him while he was withdrawring money (this wasn't one near a bank, it was infront of the cinema). He called the company that ran the atm and was informed that they no longer handled maintenance. One phone call later he was told that a person might be there the next day to fix it. He never got his card back. I guess he learnt his lesson of not typing 1337 into ATM's.

    5. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by ChiefGeneralManager · · Score: 1
      Hmm, yes. I've worked closely with a UK bank that moved from OS/2 based machines to something by NCR based on XP.

      This new platform was going to be brilliant because it would allow Flash animations, and was XP-based.

      Once roll out was under way, all 1000 ATMs in the network has to be re-booted *TWICE* per week because of a memory leak in the NCR software. Nothing crazy happended (like £20s being dispensed in place of £10s), but the availability of the ATM fleet went through the floor.

      On the VISA issue, some time ago, VISA insisted that some Philips ATMs were removed from the network because of their security. They were OS/2 based. I'm sure people with huge losses to make (like VISA) are driving security here. Banks seem to like to go for the 'softer' side of buying ATM software (Flash animation, familiar UI for cashiers etc.)

      Some time ago (perhaps 2 years) I saw a Nationwide Building Society ATM that was crashed displaying it's own IP address for all to see. I don't think moving to Windows for ATMs is a really new thing.

    6. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Once roll out was under way, all 1000 ATMs in the network has to be re-booted *TWICE* per week because of a memory leak in the NCR software.

      Well, that's not Window's fault, is it? Crappy software brings computer down; film at 11?

      I don't think I've ever used a Unix or Linux system that had any sort of process accounting or quotaing setup. On such a machine, you can bring the system to a grinding halt with a couple of lines of C.

      I saw a Nationwide Building Society ATM that was crashed displaying it's own IP address for all to see

      Embarrassing, yse, but so what? I can guarantee you that you'd not get anywhere near that IP address from the Internet. (Was it even a publicly-routable one?)

      Properly configured and running properly-written software on decent hardware, XP has uptimes to rival that of any Linux box. Besides which, cash points don't have to have 100% uptime. What would be wrong with rebooting them every morning at 3am? Even if someone tries to use it while it's down, so what? Most cahspoints are installed in twos and threes; just stagger the reboots across the group, making sure that only one is down at a time. If any fail to come back up, the others can easily call for help, while still serving people.

      No, you wouldn't have 100% uptime, perhaps it shouldn't even be necessary, but really, does it matter?

    7. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by Haxx0r · · Score: 1

      My ATM once BSODed, also in UK, at a fuel station. I was walking through it wanting to take out some cash. Instead of a "Please put in your card" message I got a BSOD. This was the fist time I learnt that ATM even can run Windows. It was very amusing but also somewhat worying. Can the savings due to remote management be justified when you have to send out a man to fix it whenever the damn thing BSODes?

    8. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      "Properly configured and running properly-written software on decent hardware, XP has uptimes to rival that of any Linux box."

      Indeed: if all your PC does is run Minesweeper, and is totally disconnected from the Internet, you can proably keep it running for a year or more. But real Windows PCs doing real work need to be rebooted at least every couple of weeks just to keep up with all the critical security updates (most of which require reboots thanks to Microsoft wiring so much functioanlity into the operating system rather than seperate processes that can be killed and restarted).

    9. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Seen an NT desktop on a B of S ATM in Aberdeen

    10. Re:My ATM had crashed - UK by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I'm sure people with huge losses to make (like VISA)

      VISA does not make losses. The risk on every transaction that goes through their systems can be passed on to the customer, the merchant, or the issuing bank.

  36. Slow a**holes in line by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great. As if waiting for some jerk to

    • Check his balance
    • transfer funds
    • buy stamps
    wasn't bad enough, now I have to wait for him to
    • Check his email
    • view stock quotes
    • Play a game of Bejeweled
    • Install BonziBuddy
    • view some pr0n
    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  37. Article's leading text by fsck! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I nominate "The Windows-based infrastructure enables remote upgrades" as the loaded statement of the year. Anybody care to take a guess as to who will be writing "upgrades" for these things?

    1. Re:Article's leading text by fsck! · · Score: 1

      Okay, first this was moderated funny, which was generous to say the least. Then someone moderated it "insightful," which just doesn't make any sense at all. Shouldn't that tag be reserved for comments that bring new information to the discussion? I was making a cheap jab at Microsoft here. How is that insightful on Slashdot?

  38. os/2 everywhere by Lys0l · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work for IBM in OS/2 TCP/IP support. People would be amazed at how much OS/2 is still out there. Banking, industry, CIA, NSA, Vatican Bank, etc. Heart/Lung machines, ATM machines and the machines that make fritos. When OS/2 went down at friot-lay, no more fritos...not good times. I'm sad to see it go, it was great for apps such as these.

    1. Re:os/2 everywhere by WillerZ · · Score: 5, Informative

      The reason OS/2 hasn't been EOL'd yet is that you need an OS/2 box if you want to start a mainframe (you can IPL it from the terminal, but to get from powered-off to powered-on you need OS/2). At least up to 2003 if you bought a zSeries box you got 2 OS/2 thinkpads inside it on shelves (I haven't poked around in any of our newer zSeries kit).

      For the curious, they're needed to tell each zSeries processor what it is. This isn't as dumb as it sounds, because each of the 16 processors can do one of 4 tasks depending on the microcode you load into it.

      You need a fairly dependable OS for this job, and when I last asked them they didn't trust Windows or Linux to do it right.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:os/2 everywhere by SunFan · · Score: 1

      When OS/2 went down at friot-lay, no more fritos...not good times.

      I'm sure millions of beating hearts had a moment of silence for the sudden halt in frito production (either that or they all had heart attacks).

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
    3. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > when I last asked them they didn't trust Windows or Linux to do it right

      More likely it does something they don't fully understand and they don't trust themselves to do it right with a rewrite.

    4. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still the case as of 6/04 as well (in the z890 line). I don't know about the embedded Thinkpads but the HMC does run Warp. Odd since the HMC for the p690 uses Linux.

    5. Re:os/2 everywhere by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 1

      Based on what a colleague of mine says, the iSeries HMC probably also runs OS/2. He was surprised that the pSeries HMC runs Linux, and I think it's a good bet the iSeries HMC doesn't run Windows.

    6. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You need a fairly dependable OS for this job, and when I last asked them they didn't trust Windows or Linux to do it right."

      Assuming these mainframes are made by IBM, the simplest explanation is that OS/2 is a IBM product and Windows and Linux are not.

    7. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at Wells Fargo. A vast majority of the ATMs have been Windows-based for years. The only exceptions might be out there in the square-shaped states that were served by Norwest Bank before they bought Wells Fargo and changed their name. That wouldn't surprise me, as Norwest had its head up its ass as far as technology goes; in fact, the technology base was a large part of the reason Norwest bought us.

      Certainly here in California, I haven't seen an OS/2 ATM in a long, long time.

    8. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Frito-Lay and we still use OS/2 Computers as the main systems for processing orders and pulling down reports. We're slowly moving away to Windows NT and XP based machines but the bulk of the software is written in COBOL for OS/2 and is INCREDIBLY unstable.

      I'm not sure if it is the programmers and COBOL or OS/2 but it's down more than it is up.

      And we're not using old computers, we're using very modern Dell systems that had to be custom built with OS/2 Warp 4. Ack.

    9. Re:os/2 everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pSeries HMC's, POWER4-based (like the p690) and the POWER5-based p5 systems, as well as the POWER5-based i5 systems, are all Linux-based.

      I would not be surprised if IBM was working on moving the mainframe HMC's (the two redundant Thinkpads mounted in the frame) to Linux as well. Keep in mind that the next generation of mainframe will be POWER5 as well.

      So IBM will have moved their big Unix hardware (RS/6000's), their AS/400 systems, and then their mainframes all to POWER5. This is a sweet consolidation and its benefits are already visible in the pSeries p5's, where you can on one system have LPAR's running Linux, AIX, and i5/OS (OS/400). How long before MVS is included in that list, and the only difference is whether or not your hardware is optimal (mainframes have a LOT of accessories and service processors) for the platform...

    10. Re:os/2 everywhere by WillerZ · · Score: 1
      Keep in mind that the next generation of mainframe will be POWER5 as well.

      Where did you hear that?

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    11. Re:os/2 everywhere by hausmaus · · Score: 1

      If I can remember this right, there are a few nuclear power plants and several medical imaging machines running OS/2, still, to this day. Can you imagine if a nuclear power plant running Windows popped up with "We're sorry, but the power plant has to be restarted ..." ... ;) I still run a BBS under OS/2 and I never, ever touch it to reboot it unless I have to install new hardware or there's a major software upgrade. It's really reliable. I remember seeing my first Windows-enabled ATM way out in BFE, Illinois (it was with Union Planters Bank). I'll be damned if the thing didn't crash on the guy who was using it, who promptly let loose a string of blue that would make a longshoreman blush. I chuckled, knowing that this would be the state of things to come. Oh well. M$ has its tendrils in everything these days. Except my computers.

      --
      Your email has been returned due to insufficent voltage.
  39. Bad move by SlashThat · · Score: 1

    ATM's + Internet = Free money for hackers
    Seriously, [virtually] every computer system has a security flaw, which will be found if enough people are interested. The only way to really secure a system is to keep it physically unreachable. Now if they connect their ATM's to the internet, the hackers will find their way inside in a matter of days, if not hours.
    The possibilities it opens are enormous - stealing PIN's, account information, or even actually withdrawing money from the ATM!

    --
    1's and 0's should be free.
    1. Re:Bad move by ploss · · Score: 1

      They will probably be on the same network they were on, just with different OS software. If it worked then, why wouldn't it work the same now? I highly doubt they will be on an open network, that would be an incredibly stupid mistake on their part...

      --
      What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex!
    2. Re:Bad move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They will probably be on the same network they were on, just with different OS software.


      RTFA, numbnuts
    3. Re:Bad move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you RTFA it says they will be web enabled. The word 'web' refers to the World Wide Web which is part of the Internet. Therefore according to the article they will have a connection to the open network known as the Internet.

    4. Re:Bad move by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA it says they will be web enabled. The word 'web' refers to the World Wide Web which is part of the Internet. Therefore according to the article they will have a connection to the open network known as the Internet.

      Did you know there is a difference between 'teh intarweb' and web pages? The new ATMs will render HTML content (sometimes called "web pages") locally. Most Wells Fargo ATMs are already running Windows, so this is just a UI change to an HTML-based display. ATMs are on private networks, not the internet.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  40. New services by cgenman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Windows-based infrastructure is designed to allow Wells Fargo to update and add services such as new languages and envelope-free deposits to its entire network remotely.

    Umm... Wouldn't envelope-free deposits require an on-site hardware shift anyway? That is, unless Windows Embedded now runs rapid prototype machinery.

    Sounds like they're running WtFXML.

  41. This was already tried... by kevb · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..with home PCs.

    We put Windows on them and gave them all high speed net access... it wasn't the most successful experiment, and they weren't stuffed full of cash.

  42. They weren't deemed helpful enough by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    What was wrong with OS/2 atms?

    They weren't helpful enough, Well Fargo ATM customers can now look forward to the ATM Assistant(TM)!

    "Hi, I'm Clippy, would you like help:

    Depositing Funds?

    Withdrawing Funds?

    Transfer your entire balance to r00m4n14n d00d?

    Selecting the proper brick to smash my keyboard with?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:They weren't deemed helpful enough by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      as a true r00m4n14n d00d I take that as a complement :)

    2. Re:They weren't deemed helpful enough by DenDave · · Score: 1

      actually, abn-amro has their atm's running nt and tbsod is a common sight here..

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    3. Re:They weren't deemed helpful enough by afd8856 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Asa another true romanian dude I say: fuck you and fuck off. You 313373 haxors are the reason I can't use paypall or purchase anything on the internet right now. Another time: fuck you

      (Imi cer scuze pentru cazul in care tu nu te ocupi cu chestii de astea. Insa e frustrant sa vezi cat suntem de desconsiderati pe internet din cauza unor pungasi)

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    4. Re:They weren't deemed helpful enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then stop sending your purchase requests in all caps, and run 'em through a spell checker sometime.

    5. Re:They weren't deemed helpful enough by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Yeah you are a true romanian d00d, a 'fuck you' and 'fuck off' first then
      catch(NotHax0rException e){System.err.print("Sorry man... "+e);System.exit(1);}
      Oricum, imi pare rau de 'paypal'. Ai dreptate, eu nu ma ocup cu asa ceva, chiar mi-au fost si mie furati bani din cont. Dar 'posting'-ul meu a fost doar o gluma, chill out. Salut.
  43. corruption here? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    [...], said the move to Windows-based systems is "not great news for the security of the system. I'm sure there's a lot of holes that will be created because of this."

    Now the question to answer is: Whose hands were greased?

  44. BSOD by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blue Screen Of Debt

    1. Re:BSOD by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      No credit card here, so I'll make mine a 'Blue Screen of Debit,' thank you very much.

  45. I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    I mean, it's not like the bank is going to provide keyboards, mice, IE, open network connections o the rest of the world, etc., etc.

    Windows is the OS that a very specific application runs on. That's it.

    It won't be running, say, MS SQLServer.

    Wells Fargo has been in business for a while. I'm sure it's got a competent staff looking at this. I'm sure it'll be looking for exploits. I'm sure there'll be a significat security infrastructure.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yes but that's just it.

      they're making a big deal of "web enabling" something that has always needed a network connection to operate, of course if you're running a banking network you should be able to afford to keep it seperate as well.

      the machines have already had the possibilities they're buffing up now with this, so the question really is wtf for are they making a big deal out of it? ms giving them pricecuts?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, to me it looks like they've got a thin client in front of a J2EE backend.

      I think their excitement is the new communications infrastructure: the fact that updates via a teller can immediately be checked on the ATM. They're really happy over their new SOAP/J2EE bits. Of course, all the user sees is the ATM, so it's the only drum they have to bang. They might as well bang it for all they're worth.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    3. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question, if the whole thing's J2EE and SOAP, then couldn't they later just redo the entire thing with a minimum of effort? I mean, their current platform is WinXP embedded, but are they locked into this?

    4. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm afraid I don't know.

      I take your point that being based on Java and open standards does give them options to move elsewhere. It appears that it's the ATM that's running windows.

      My original point was simply that Windows on an ATM is probably not the same as Windows on the desktop.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    5. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I get really happy with soapy bits as well... fnar, fnar...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    6. Re:I think the rhetoric is a bit overheated. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if so, then i wouldn't drum something that some banks have had for a decade or more(no delay between atm, web-banking or asking from a physical teller).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  46. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OS/2 does not have the same codebase you jew

  47. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 1

    Search on Windows security exploits and display the results and oh ... darn I hope this gets submitted because my browser crashed when all the results came back.

    Let me guess, you ran the search in Internet Explorer?

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
  48. Whew, that was a close one. by Dash16 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Looks like I cancelled my Wells Fargo account just in the nick of time...

  49. Crashed ATM by Nikademus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this means more pics like these:
    Runtime error
    Bluescreen

    --
    I gave up with the idea of an useful sig...
    1. Re:Crashed ATM by v1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try this one at home, kids. Go to your local ATM, feed it your card. (ok, you're brave now) Pin in. Select Transfer, Savings to Checking. Now when it asks for how much, put 0. Yes, zero. Like I did when I realized I didn't know how much I had in savings. (and it doesn't tell you what your limit is... nerf?)

      At several banks here in town, you get a ticket that says "Amount error #13", your card pops out, (thankfully!) and "TEMPORARILY OUT OF SERVICE" pops up on the display.

      Whoopsie!

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Crashed ATM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Divide By Zero Monster strikes again!

    3. Re:Crashed ATM by danimrich · · Score: 1

      not necessarily-but see for yourself: http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a0203763/atm.html

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    4. Re:Crashed ATM by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's pretty entertaining, but I do wonder why you would visit an ATM to move oney between acounts, instead of just banking online? Was this some years ago?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Crashed ATM by v1 · · Score: 1

      It's been a couple years. I have since changed banks to one that offers a lot more services such as online banking, and doesn't have a list of silly things they charge for. I don't know if the ATMs still have that bug in them, I haven't tried lately. Knocked out two ATMs with it though - first one was a "what just happened?" and second one (after I did the transfer) was just to confirm the bug. I would hope it has since been fixed - there's gotta be some auditing done to an ATM when it gets crashed, to find and fix the problem.

      I suspect it wasn't a division by zero, but rather a case where a transaction was done and then a sanity check was made to see that money had moved in the transaction, (like making sure savings was less after a transfer savings to checking) a check which failed.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  50. Learn to write. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "An ATM doesn't have to be on "the net" to do that. It has to communicate to the central handling server regardless of it's OS."

    "It's" means "it is".

    1. Re:Learn to write. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn to be a better GNAA member

  51. Digging Deeper... by ploss · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's a link to their Press Release: Wells Fargo: All ATMs Now Web-Enabled, All Banking Stores With Online Stations (from March 1st)

    And a tidbit about some new features:

    Wells Fargo's webATM(R) machines feature six language screen options; customizable fast-cash amounts and MyATM(R) receipt preferences; access to 22 financial accounts; the highest level of security; and colorful, large font touch-screens that make it easier to navigate from screen to screen.
    --
    What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex!
    1. Re:Digging Deeper... by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 1

      Actually, customizable fast-cash would be nice. Only option I ever get is $60 from checking. I don't have a checking account, nor do I want $60. I either want $20 or $40. Bozo.

      I'm still curious to know as to why all ATMs are still on dial-up, it's annoying.

      --
      All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
  52. Since moving to Windows ATMs crash ALL THE TIME. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few of the banks downtown where I live all switched over to Windows based ATMs about a year ago. Since then they crash several times a week, or just plain dont work. The images posted above is VERY VERY common, and i've had a few days that i've had to try *four* ATMs before I found one that wasn't crashed.

  53. Dead 'ol OS/2 has benefited Linux by pigfukr · · Score: 0

    JFS and LVM came from OS/2 Warp 4.5x. (OS/2 code, not from the AIX versions) Enjoy your dead code. :) Although I am pleased to see many posts insulting the change instead of the usual DEAD DEAD DEAD! posts such as yours. Yeah, I'm on an OS/2 4.52 workstation (a.k.a eComStation 1.2) which happens to be sitting next to a pile of Slackware, CentOS and even a couple OS/2 based web servers. I do agree that I'd trust a Linux ATM vastly more than a WinTurd one.

    --
    pigfukr
  54. Advertising Revenue. Not Security. by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 1

    It's not intended to increase security. There have already been people who create fake ATM's. A person comes up, puts the card in the mag stripe reader, and enters a 4 digit pin, when suddenly the machine issues a "error" and ejects the card. No matter the level of patience, the person eventually gives up and goes away. An ATM that has a familiar and trusted "look and feel" might be made into a safe place to do business one might not want to do over the web.

    My guess is that this isn't an attempt at increasing security at Wells Fargo ATM's but of being able to offer web ads while your transaction is in progress. In addition they'll probably add a menu of things you can buy and have sent to you. Additionally, Wells Fargo gets ad revenue and can start sending you spam to your physical mailbox (which is not a legal problem since you have a business relationship with them).

    "New Baldness Cure! Nervous about using the web? Go to an ATM, put your card in, and choose option 4 from the services menu! It couldn't be easier!"

    1. Re:Advertising Revenue. Not Security. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There have already been people who create fake ATM's.

      Yeah, but just because there are people who pick locks doesn't mean I want to install the new MS Door with web-upgradable locking technology.

  55. Accounting by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Funny
    The San Francisco-based bank said it also installed more than 3,000 online stations in nearly all of its 6,046 branch locations.

    That can't mean they have more than 3000 in total, as that's only around half of 6046. Even in marketing-land where the margins are bigger, you'd need at least 5000 out of 6000 to claim "nearly all". Logically, this means they must have more than 3000 online stations in each of their 6046 branches. That's over 18 million Windows licenses. Some sales guy at MS just got a new yacht.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    1. Re:Accounting by Snowsphere · · Score: 1

      That figure could easily be correct. The simplest explanation is that nobody wants the new machines so they just get sent from branch to branch.

  56. Here it Comes by gitana · · Score: 1


    All t3h moneys are belong to us!!!

    You have no chance to survive, make your withdrawal.
    HA, HA, HA, .........

    1. Re:Here it Comes by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      What happen? We get hax0rs! What? Main screen turn on! It's you! How are you gentlemen! All your cash are belong to us! You have no chance to withdraw, make your time. Ha ha ha ha... Take off every "FDIC" for great Justice.

  57. This is very common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen many ATMs replaced with Windows and for the most part, they crash several times a week. The fact that their uptime is so minimal makes me wonder why they charge fee's anymore. There is no convience when you have to use an ATM to find it crashed and then having to wander into the bank anyways.

  58. No Surprise by twalls · · Score: 1

    This is coming from the same company that spilled all of my personal information (SSN, account numbers, home address, phone number, etc.) when some of their computers were stolen last year. They then had the audacity to use this as a reason to advertise their credit-monitoring/fraud-prevention services. I can't imagine how bad this would have been if they were actually my bank.

  59. Yet somehow, it does. by mcc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Existing Windows XP embedded based ATMs, made by Diebold, have already been effected by Windows XP-targetting worms. This should be sufficient to demonstrate that the code bases at least share whatever code caused vulnerability to the Nachi worm. The obvious question then becomes, if and when further holes in Windows XP are discovered, what happens if they too are in the code shared with Windows XP Embedded?

    I mean, it's just an awfully funny coincidence that the sudden emergence of the term "cyber-crime" in connection with ATMs just happens, after all these years of computer ATMs, to coincide with the introduction of Windows based ATMs.

    And I somehow suspect that in five years, when WinXPEmbedded ATMs are everywhere, if anyone observes it as odd that how ATMs suddenly have a security track record now, we'll have people saying "oh that's just part of the technology, there's nothing you can do about it, it would be the same with any other vendor"...

    1. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by Deviate_X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The implication here are grave, and important, Additionally it should be questioned is:

      For how many years have ATM terminals been exposed to the entire internet? The 2003 nachi worm exposed the fact that important financial networks have been susceptible to exploitation for a long time.

      It's the more embarrassing to realize that none of the so called Analysts, Gartner Analysts (a $9 billion advice giving outfit), or so called security experts, who now have the gall to pontificate (http://www.securityfocus.com/), had anything useful to say prior.

      No it took some script-kiddy with too much time on her hands to post a worm to mirc networks (perhaps) to bring the real issue to the fore.

      The dangerous ones are not the worm writing script-kiddies, it's the smart ones who notice the vulnerability and exploit them quietly.

      Simply: Prior to nachi, know one can account for what went on [skimmer], except that your accounts were unsafe and exposed, after nachi you at least have the opportunity know it.

    2. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For how many years have ATM terminals been exposed to the entire internet?

      Well, they weren't exposed to the entire internet. They were on a VPN. Such ATMs are always put on a VPN. But that's the fun part, because the VPN apparently had holes in it.

      In other words-- at least this was the theory discussed at the time-- the ATMs had been put on a VPN so that they were inaccessible to the outside world. But other bank computers were apparently allowed in the same VPN. And somehow the Nachi worm got inside the VPN, at which point it was free to infect the ATMs...

    3. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by Deviate_X · · Score: 1

      Well, they weren't exposed to the entire internet

      The error is making a technical distinction, which conflicts with actuality.

      For all intents and purposes the nachi worm wiggled its way unimpeded, from random spots on the internet into so described 'private' network. Therefore it this network was clearly exposed to the entire internet, how could you possibly argue otherwise?

      This is the problem with the 'experts' who think so narrowly as to imagine that when the light is turned on; that the thing they see just came into existence!

    4. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by mcc · · Score: 1

      Well that's kind of just getting into a matter of semantics, isn't it? Personally I would distinguish between "exposed" and "accessible". :)

    5. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Existing Windows XP embedded based ATMs, made by Diebold, have already been effected by Windows XP-targetting worms.
      I'm not surprised, Diebold showed that paticular bit of silicon snake oil they call a voting machine to my government, who after they stopped laughing pointed out that there isn't a US style lobby system so donations are not going to help change their decision. What is it with these guys - crappy solutions made quickly, putting demos on PCs out as production systems instead of cheaper in volume embedded systems that just need more development time. Are these guys allergic to planning beyond a week?

      Perhaps someone should call the attention of the major credit card groups to this stupidity of putting an ATM on a public network - they are in danger of having to shell out a lot when these things get owned, not just the bank that makes the stupid decision to put these things on the public internet.

    6. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone should call the attention of the major credit card groups to this stupidity of putting an ATM on a public network -

      What's really funny is watching people pontificate on web forums as if the Major Credit Card Groups don't already have a robust security analysis team in place.

      Does anybody really think random-slashdot-user is right that the Credit Card companies are totally shields-down on this matter??

    7. Re:Yet somehow, it does. by lgw · · Score: 1

      There's an assumption there that the VPN was weak. The worm could have also entered the private network through social enginnering or deliberate introduction. The only weakness here is that it's easier to find an existing virus for a well-known OS.

      While I can understand a "security through obscurity" argument if you're worried about the bank being embarrassed by crashing or vandalized ATMs, anyone who could cook up a viable plan to steal money from ATMs is quite likely to know quite a bit about the network anyway, so I don't see the weakness.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  60. dear mother of god! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Windows-based, web-enabled (does this mean on a public network?) ATMs.

    Dear God. The shit has hit the fan. Head for the hills!

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:dear mother of god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had these local to me for years. I've walked up to a BSOD multiple times and that isn't encouraging.

      tbone

  61. A real Fuck You moment from your bank. by gelfling · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's great. They got with the program and screwed all their customers.

  62. Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by rimu+guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    And in a not unrelated story: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash

    A New Zealand computer hacker has accessed the private bank accounts of dozens of unsuspecting Kiwis, showing how easy it is to break into our internet banking system.

    The hacker installed software in a Wellington internet cafe that allowed him to gather the user names and passwords of people banking online at the cafe.

    Police e-crime national manager Maarten Kleintjes says he has been urging banks "for years" to introduce systems that ensure internet banking is safe, but most have been slow to respond.

    Kleintjes says the problem is that internet banking access relies on a simple password "which can easily be stolen". Other countries use "two-factor identification" where, in addition to a password, the customer is given a new security password for each internet banking session.

    Only two local banks, ASB and BankDirect, have a two-part identification system, where the customer is sent a text with a security password to use before transferring money.

    Online bankers can follow the advice on bank websites about using anti-virus software to detect and avoid key-logging programmes on home computers, but the software provides no guarantees. Kleintjes says it is "unreasonable and unrealistic" to expect all customers to know how to do this. He said the banks should introduce safe systems that have been available overseas for years.

    --
    Linux VPS Hosting you can Bank On

    1. Re: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by ibentmywookie · · Score: 1

      This is why I never do internet banking on anything other than my GNU/Linux home computer. I will NOT do it even on a relatives/friends computer (especially a relatives computer, most likely to be h4x0red).

      When my girlfriend was overseas recently (I didn't go), she gave me her account number and password and I did her internet banking for her (paid bills, told her how much she had left, looked for evidence of CC fraud, etc). No *way* would I let her do internet banking on a public terminal.

      --
      -- The doctor said I wouldn't get so many nose bleeds if I just kept my finger out of there!
    2. Re: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      This is why I never do Internet banking from a computer I don't own.
      While it is probably possible for a hacker to get past my firewall (a separate box running a firewall distro) and then load a keylogger onto my linux desktop, I feel a little bit safer than those running windows.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    3. Re: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I never do internet banking ...period It's just a matter of when, not if, a vulnerability is identified / developed that will exploit even the best controls.

    4. Re: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      This hacker used standard techniques to grab the userids and passwords of people accessing their internet banking sites from untrusted terminals - this relates to ATMs how?

    5. Re: Hacker takes 3 minutes to get your cash by AC-x · · Score: 1

      My bank protects me from keyloggers by only asking for random letters from my password, never the whole password at once.

      Of course if would probably be possible to get enough information to withdraw money over the phone by saving a copy of every page I viewed, but that's still a lot more involved then just logging keystrokes

  63. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here I was thinking that security by obscurity was a bad thing...

  64. History by erick99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've been using ATMs since they were first available and I use them quite a bit. I have never had a single penny lost. I've not known anyone to lose a penny. I'm sure it has happened, but I bet the incidence is low.

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  65. well.. by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    now they'll finally test the old adage "No one ever got fired for choosing Microsoft".. when someone gets really fired for choosing Microsoft. Wonder if they'll hold MS responsible for security breaches?

    --
    meh
    1. Re:well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Wonder if they'll hold MS responsible for security breaches?

      I'm sure the EULA disclaims all responsibility.

  66. big enough to know by ianguy · · Score: 1

    I think Wells Fargo is big enough and serious enough to know the risks and do all they can to stay on top of the security of their ATMs I have used these "web-enabled" ATMs and they are a lot more usefull than the old ones. You can set a one-button quick cash that remembers if you want 20, 40, 60... and if you want a reciept. I have rarely seen them down, and never with an embarrasing error box or BSOD.

  67. What's the big deal? by KoshClassic · · Score: 0

    What's the big deal? I know of at least one other bank that's had NT based ATMs for years.

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
  68. Half is nearly all? by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The San Francisco-based bank said it also installed more than 3,000 online stations in nearly all of its 6,046 branch locations."

    How is it that less than half is considered nearly all? Or are they stretching their ATMs so that it is so large that it is physically touching more than one branch, or just building branches next to eachother and throwing an ATM in between?

    The math is appaling.

    --
    All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
    1. Re:Half is nearly all? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Ah, but they said more than 3,000. Maybe it's about 5,500 thousand.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Half is nearly all? by wkitchen · · Score: 1
      How is it that less than half is considered nearly all? Or are they stretching their ATMs so that it is so large that it is physically touching more than one branch, or just building branches next to eachother and throwing an ATM in between?
      No, no. It's not like that at all. They're installing more than 3000 online stations at EACH branch location. Except for a few very small branches, which will have 3000 or fewer online stations.
  69. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by drsmithy · · Score: 1
    Search on Windows security exploits and display the results and oh ... darn I hope this gets submitted because my browser crashed when all the results came back.

    Now take out the ones that rely on the end user to download and install a trojan of some sort (which knocks out everything IE-related), those that have been patched and those that are blocked by the firewall.

    How's your list now ?

  70. Re:Before you ask whether they're mad ... by VidEdit · · Score: 1

    Web Enabled is a misnomer. The so-called "Web" ATMs just use an HTML layer for layout. The actual transaction is communicated through another layer.

    --
  71. Somebody set us up the ATM by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Funny

    All your money belong to us!

  72. And for those trying to pry the computer box... by game+kid · · Score: 5, Funny
    Clippy would pop up and say...

    It looks like you are attempting to rob this ATM.

    Would you like help?

    • Get me therapy by
      dialing 911
    • Just send the FBI,
      I can take them
      with my bare hands

    (Cancel)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:And for those trying to pry the computer box... by cooley · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I wish I had mod points. That was funny.

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    2. Re:And for those trying to pry the computer box... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's easy -- when it tells you to "Press space to continue", just press any other key, and the ATM will spit out all its money!

  73. Those guys at Gartner must be briliant by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

    > Avivah Litan, an analyst at Gartner Inc., in Stamford, Conn., said the move to Windows-based systems is "not great news for the security of the system. I'm sure there's a lot of holes that will be created because of this.

    Heh.. so after some 15 years someone at Gartner finaly figured OS/2 was good for something?

    1. Re:Those guys at Gartner must be briliant by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 1

      Not entirely correct, they finally figured out that Windows is BAD for something.

    2. Re:Those guys at Gartner must be briliant by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that is another way to say it.. maybe even more accurate indeed.

      Ah well, I was working for IBM in the early 90s, and had to deal with the rubbish published by Gartner quite a bit. Seeing this statement comming from them 15 years later is just plain hilarious :)

  74. Tell that to the IIS users of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing one can defend Microsoft at this point based on the fact that their big security disasters have drowned out the attention given to their small ones. In this case security on their home systems is so bad it apparently makes the security on their server systems seem not so bad by comparison.

    Well, it's still bad compared to anything else. The NT series had a pretty awful security reputation before the current spyware epidemic started, and they've earned a poor security reputation completely apart from the spyware problems the home users have experienced. Microsoft's given a lot of lip service to the problems but but problems are still happening.

    1. Re:Tell that to the IIS users of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the NT kernel itself has a pretty good security record, and the RPC problems affected pretty much every vendor which supports DCE-RPC, incuding IBM.

      Now IIS on the other hand...

  75. Re:Local AMC theater self serve ticket machines Wi by markxz · · Score: 1

    Most cinema ticketing systems run on Windows (some using a customised Access database).

    The public terminals run windows as well. I have seen some that were designed to take cash, however they were not reliable to be used for cash sales)

    I would be more worried about entering my pin using an on screen keyboard where it would be easy to see what is being typed.

  76. Bank Of Scotland != RBS [N/T] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different banks.

  77. Don't worry by matthewg42 · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about it. If your bank details get leaked and all your money stolen, your identity assumed by terrorist and your whole life ruined...

    You can always claim $5 from Microsoft.

    Wow, it's almost worth it!

  78. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No open ports, no way to exploit it.
    Until someone figures out a hole, bug or crash in the multimedia interface itself that lets them install a keylogger...

    Oh, but that's silly. How could someone with only physical access to a machine find out a way to compromise it?

  79. new hardware... new software? by themacbryan · · Score: 1

    I hope this new hardware and software comes with a free 60-day trial of norton antivirus... I have a feeling itd be secure then...

  80. Forgot a couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Run Ad-Aware

    Run Spybot

    fight ticket for parking meter that expired while you went through the windows routine at the atm

    Rinse

    Reboot

    Repeat

    Get cash?

  81. Re:Local AMC theater self serve ticket machines Wi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barring PEBKAC issues Windows 98 is actually pretty secure on its own. As long as they weren't running IIS or being used by lusers for email/web bullshit those ticket terminals could probably be run safely on the internet.

  82. Why do you needed to be web enabled... by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    Why isn't a propriatary system good for a single use device. its like putting Linux on watches.

  83. what a genius by suezz · · Score: 1

    who was the genius that came up with that idea of buying windoze based atm's - I came across one in a bank a while back and it had the old blue screen of death. ya the embedded kernel must be better than the desktop one.

  84. MOD by 4Lancer.net · · Score: 1

    Sweet. Someone mod this up.

    --
    All your searching needs (and free money!) - 4Lancer.net
  85. Broken Links... by Phixxr · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I went to the ATM last month(oddly enough, a Wells Fargo), and was greeted by a blank page with several telltale IE Broken Image icons.


    Really, how hard would it have been to go to a more-secure os/browser combination? Certainly wouldn't have been more expensive...


    --phixxr

    --
    ungggghhhh
  86. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Oh, but that's silly. How could someone with only physical access to a machine find out a way to compromise it?

    That deserves at least a +3 funny.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  87. Here's what they should of done by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    They should of hired a team of programmers and researchers to design a OS specifically talored to the task of a ATM. Then sold it to other banks at half the cost of Windows.

  88. Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't do this with all these fly-by-wire(night), computerized airliners...or are they? I wouldn't want to see the BSOD actually mean it.

    1. Re:Thank goodness by Stumbles · · Score: 2, Funny
      In that case it would be

      Blue Sky Of Death

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
  89. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    Except they won't have physical access to the actual machine so they can't insert floppy disks and CD-ROMs to get their malicious code on to the machine itself. They can just point and sputter in the likely cludgy interface with whatever minimal input device they're allowed.

  90. The phrase that comes to mind by Dorsai65 · · Score: 1

    is "playing leapfrog with a unicorn"...

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  91. Alternatives? by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    I still wonder why companies don't use BSD for things like this. Sure, they could use Linux, but it then there's all the compliance with the GPL and such. With OpenBSD touting security so much and NetBSD able to run on my dead-squirrel-in-a-cardboard-box machine, they would seem like an ideal choice.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    1. Re:Alternatives? by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      They aren't changing because OS/2 can't do this, they're changing because diebold won't sell them any new systems and it's a lot easier to manage a homogeneous network.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
  92. Given M$ track record?? by toby · · Score: 1

    How can you say this with a straight face: Just because one has security issues does not mean the other will too ? Do you actually look forward to a keylogger on the ATM you use?

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:Given M$ track record?? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd bet there are keyloggers on dozens of ATMs right now, and the OS has nothing to do with it. You hardly need software access to install a hardware keylogger. There are dozens of ways ATMs have been "pwnt" in the past, all of which have ended up with people going to jail.

      Stealing someone's PIN doesn't take a geek, just the willingness to shoulder-surf. Turning a PIN into money, on the other hand, requires the robber's physical presense at a bank or ATM, with all the associated risk.

      Complaints about network security might be interesting, but keyloggers just aren't.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Given M$ track record?? by toby · · Score: 1

      Software keyloggers, such as can be routinely installed remotely into Windows, are a network security problem, in my book.

      --
      you had me at #!
    3. Re:Given M$ track record?? by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you know enough about a given bank's ATM system to break into their private network, is it really going to be hard to write a keylogger for the ATM itself? Would you even need to, given DES is typically the best encryption used? Now, if Windows somehow makes it easier to break into the private network *that's* clearly a security risk.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  93. ANY infastructure can enable remote upgrades.... by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    it just has to be set up. Cisco routers can be upgraded remotely. Just as long as there is some sort of connectivity between the ATM and the banks systems then a program can be written to enable remote administration.

  94. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once (briefly) attended a college which had windows web-kiosks in nearly every building. The super had done his job right, and they were locked up tighter than a gnat's ass. All you had for input was a trackball and one button, and the system started on the university webpage.

    I say this to illustrate the excellenet security inherent in the windows platform: I owned that system within five minutes of touching it, without adding any media.

    A windows-based ATM will be hacked, and probably within hours at most.

  95. How lame. by Stumbles · · Score: 1
    said the move to Windows-based systems is "not great news for the security of the system. I'm sure there's a lot of holes that will be created because of this.""

    That's a hellva attitude to have.

    --
    My karma is not a Chameleon.
  96. Easy money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the other guy said, Sneakers just finished here in the UK, so I immediately thought of that.

    But then I thought of the beginning of Terminator 2, where John Connor uses a brute force attack on an ATM using a calculator of some sort.

    1. Re:Easy money... by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      It was an Atari laptop computer. I don't think they were ever made for real, just for the movies.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Easy money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they were for real. My friend had one. Though to call it a "laptop" is a streach. More of a primitave PDA. It ran DOS however IIRC.

    3. Re:Easy money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atari Portfolio.

      Or, without even knowing whether we're discussing Terminator or Sneakers, it could've been a STacy.

  97. Clippy says..... by MSDos-486 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I see you have used this ATM before. Would you like me to remember your PIN so you won't have to enter it again?"

  98. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by BenFranske · · Score: 1

    Certainly there are security issues with any OS. As long as you stay aware of current threats and stay on top of patching your systems you aren't usually in too much of a jam. In my experience Wells Fargo IT Security is pretty on top of threats and patching.

    Regardless of what OS's you have used and like you must admit that OS2 is getting a little long in the tooth these days and really can't be expected to have all the features expected from the modern ATM. Remember these systems are not designed for use by experts and need to be able to read to you (for the blind) possibly change font size for those with eyesight problems, etc. My point is that ATMs are not simple and require a changing dynamic platform. I think that if the engineers at Wells Fargo feel OS2 is no longer able to provide the features they require in their ATMs they should replace it.

  99. Amusing by MBraynard · · Score: 1

    I guess the Lunatic fringe is in a tizzy - either your ATM is a Diebold machine or runs Windows.

  100. Clippy says.... by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    "I see you have mark a point on your radar. Would you like me to set it as a default attack point?"

  101. Bad Math by zsreppok · · Score: 1

    I registered JUST for this. On this website it claims: "The San Francisco-based bank said it also installed more than 3,000 online stations in nearly all of its 6,046 branch locations" So, Wells Fargo has done a half-machine job, eh?

    --
    Zach is just this guy, you know?
  102. So my bank account by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    can get the dreaded Blue Screen of DEATH ?

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  103. Don't worry, be happy by BigTimOBrien · · Score: 1

    Choicepoint selling data to criminals, Bank of America exposing customer data. Windows XP on my ATM. I can't even get Windows XP to work correctly on a Dell specifically designed for it. Don't worry, be happy.

    --
    ------ Tim O'Brien
  104. Why are untrained tellers doing that? by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's a Wells Fargo ATM close to where I work, not inside a bank, and the guy who puts the money in it is always accompanied by an armed guard.

    I wouldn't trust a bank that had an untrained teller doing that.

    Particularly one who is taking instructions from someone over the phone. Yeah, I really trust that system.

    What bank do you work for? I want to be sure that I don't have any accounts with it.

    Part of security is being correctly trained. An untrained person (problem #1) taking instructions over the phone (problem #2) to service a machine that is "web enabled" (problem #3) is a script for disaster.

    1. Re:Why are untrained tellers doing that? by E_elven · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...And this concludes our introductory lecture "It's true, no-one else knows what the hell they're doing either". Any questions?

      No?

      Thank you all for coming, the next "Corporations 101" lecture will be monday. Bring your notebooks.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    2. Re:Why are untrained tellers doing that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bank do you work for?

      Bank of America?

    3. Re:Why are untrained tellers doing that? by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      Most of the time the teller is the lowest paid employee, and there is usually a lot of turnover on the teller line. This is pretty much true for every bank/credit union.

      That being said, it is not hard to load $20s in an ATM machine, a trained monkey could do it. If someone does rob the bank, it isn't like they are taking the money out of your account to give to Mr. Bad Guy with Gun.

    4. Re:Why are untrained tellers doing that? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      ATMs located at the bank are usually restocked by tellers, particularly in lower-crime areas. Same for simple maintenance tasks. It's just the sensible thing to do.

  105. On your mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First one to install Linux on these machines gets a cookie, not to mention lots of money and some prison time...

    1. Re:On your mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a shag.
      With a block.
      That is not connected to your hand.

  106. Wow by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    To hell in a hand basket my friends, to hell in a hand basket.

  107. WF Already Firmly Web-Based by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wells Fargo already allows you to do a remarkable amount of banking on the web. I suspect that extending the connectivity to the ATM will allow them to provide services at ATM's that aren't available from other banks. It also allows them to customize the programming themselves, rather than rely on whatever Diebold wants to sell them. I must say, WF ATM's have a more sensible workflow than certain other machines. This matters in places like a university student union building where there might be 100 people lined up to use 4 machines.

    As for security, it's 3DES over SSL on a pocket network. Most ATM's use a standard protocol over a CCITT link on a POTS line.

  108. No Comment (Diebold) by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

    ATMs do millions of transactions a day very accurately (other than Diebold) and these jokers can't make a voting machines accountable?

    http://midnightspaghetti.com/newsDiebold.php

    --
    ~hylas
    1. Re:No Comment (Diebold) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "ATMs do millions of transactions a day very accurately (other than Diebold) and these jokers can't make a voting machines accountable?"

      You're scapegoating. It's easier to focus on Diebold than to put your brain around the fact that, regardless of Diebold, there are millions of your countrymen who voted for the status quo. That should scare you a lot more than anything Diebold could have done. Does it inspire you to kill 40 million people?
      That's really the question. Are you outraged enough to kill and/or die to change things, are are you only angry enough to take jabs at Diebold?

      I didn't notice any assassinations or rebellions after the election of 2004, so I assume the sentiment runs heavily to the latter, and not at all to the former.

    2. Re:No Comment (Diebold) by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

      I REALLY can't resist. ;-)

      "You're scapegoating."

      ???

      "Does it inspire you to kill 40 million people?
      That's really the question. Are you outraged enough to kill and/or die to change things"

      Sounds like you are. I might be willing to make an exception with you, what's your address?

      "I didn't notice any assassinations or rebellions after the election of 2004"

      Where have you been?

      Man! you're sure reading a lot in to a single post.
      You need to take another pill hippy, AND get a haircut. ... yeah, turn down that music, just think of what your Mom will do when she gets back.

      Anonymous Coward, when you attack someone, at least do your homework.

      1) Read their previous posts
      2) Read this:

      http://gandalf.home.digital.net/trollfaq.html#it em 8

      (You'd probably be classified as a LOOSE CANNON)

      Then read:

      http://gandalf.home.digital.net/trollfaq.html#it em 1

      Oh, and anyone that defends Diebold is an idiot or has his Girlfriend configure his firewall, you've checked it recently? ... haven't you?
      You' better scoot off and run "Spy-Aware" again.

      Actually, never mind.
      You caught me, I'm a liberal ...and damn, YOU"RE GOOD!
      I'd love to congratulate you, what's that address? ... meow.

      --
      ~hylas
    3. Re:No Comment (Diebold) by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 1

      http://www.votergate.tv/

      --
      ~hylas
  109. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

    Also take out the ones that need more then numbers and F-keys to initiate locally.

    --
    Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  110. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Try and search for 0S/2 exploits even with Google. You're not going to find tons."

    What's the point of writing an exploit if nobody is going to see it? The market share of OS/2 is so small the culprit would have to a marketing department to advertise the exploit.

  111. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by cont4gion · · Score: 1
    .. making it no more vulnerable than any other OS they might choose.
    Uhh.. then why were the first known atm machines hit by viruses Windows-XPEmbeded-machines compromised by the Nachi worm?
    --
    I done got poor grammar skills an' I be proud o that.
  112. Yaa for software monoculture by Seigen · · Score: 1
    I'd like to know whats to stop worms and such from propagating on the network of atm's now.

    From what little I know the bsd variants have some of the best security around. It would make far more sense to built them around that. For that matter since when does an atm need to do anything but dispense cash? I _want_ anything involved with my money to be as simple as possible since you cannot secure what you don't fully understand, and if you put all that windows baggage on it well security is the cost. Lets pray they strip it down enough that our money stays put, but I rather doubt it.

    Speaking of weird things. I think someone said they were moving to 3DES. The question is why? Sure 3DES is probably secure for awhile, but it would seem to make far more sense to go to a 160 bit version of AES since it at least a complete algorithm. While being able to break DES may not help with 3DES right now, the one is made from 3 of the others and who knows what the future may bring.

    1. Re:Yaa for software monoculture by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1
      I _want_ anything involved with my money to be as simple as possible since you cannot secure what you don't fully understand

      The banks and ATM suppliers do not care what you (or I) want.
    2. Re:Yaa for software monoculture by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1
      The banks and ATM suppliers do not care what you (or I) want.

      Ouch, isn't that exactly when we know something has gone wrong? Businesses not caring about their customers anymore? Are banks not businesses? If they behave like that, it means that they can. Which means they don't have to compete to get you. I'll let you figure out what that ultimately means.

    3. Re:Yaa for software monoculture by vladest · · Score: 1

      there is nothing with 3DES & OS/2. 3DES works great on current TCS for OS/2.
      The problem with EMV cards. But support for Diebold & NCR atms is exist

  113. When Pigs Fly by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that a year from now if no security breaches are made, Slashdot will post a story with the title "Most Slashdot posters were wrong, XP based ATMs turned out to be secure after all".

    1. Re:When Pigs Fly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. It'll be posted right after the story about SCO's courtroom triumph and right before Slashdot's Duke Nukem Forever review.

    2. Re:When Pigs Fly by waferhead · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, while I agree there is a little... hostility on /. v MS in general :-), and virtually NO chance you will ever see such an article on /., ...based on MSs track record... ...I will be shocked if I DON'T see a HAHAHAHAHAHA-I-told-you-so article within 6 months.
      My moneys on 6 WEEKS.
      (6 minutes if someones already hacked WFs network, and has just left backdoors in place)

    3. Re:When Pigs Fly by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      I'm not making any predictions, but you could always post an "I was wrong" message on Slashdot in 6 weeks if your prediction is wrong. You could post it as a response to any story in an off-topic manner and you wouldn't need permission from the Slashdot editors.

  114. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until someone figures out a hole, bug or crash in the multimedia interface itself that lets them install a keylogger...

    Without the camera and auditing system catching them.

    Oh, but that's silly. How could someone with only physical access to a machine find out a way to compromise it?

    More like why bother installing a keylogger when you can just look over someone's shoulder. And what good does a keylogger do anyway?

  115. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by man_of_mr_e · · Score: 1

    They weren't, at least not that I'm aware of. They were DoS'd because of high network activity.

  116. A Linux solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well what are the options of a linux solution to this? Can embedded linux be used ATM? Is it reliable enough... if they were willing to make the switch between OS/2 to Windows why not look at OS/2 to Linux?

    1. Re:A Linux solution? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Neither Linux or Windows should be used for this. Maybe Linux without any GUI. But an embedded secure system would be a lot better. Like the old ATM's, they were progably an 8080 running exactly ONE program, not some "OS".

      I was at Wells Fargo recently, and they could not print a receipt or statement for a deposit, I got a hand-written form, due to their systems being down, and in fact I still am unsure if they credited the deposit (I was depositing money for somebody else in their account). This was at their nifty new kiosk setups, I was there with about 50 other people who were waiting in line because of problems with the teller machines and they all seemed to think this was normal. I have also been at stores a LOT where you can't buy anything because the systems are down, once I waited for an hour with a huge crowd before giving up (PC Richardsons in NYC). This simply did not happen before about 1990, a store's computer system was always up. It is obvious from the screens that they are all running Windows XP (new colored window borders). The programmers can't even get rid of the damn taskbar despite these being single-use machines, so I would not blame only Microsoft for this horrible mess (I hardly use Windows at all and I know how to hide the taskbar). The fact is that our infrastructure is being designed by idiots who probably thing "running windows" is the natural way a computer works. It is all going to go to complete hell, this mess has only just begun.

  117. just imagine by krunk4ever · · Score: 0

    just imagine, someone installed a keylogger onto just 1 atm machine... the horror!

  118. woooow bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, Windows (inferring IE) + money. Why does this seem like a ZDNet story about internet fraud waiting to happen.

  119. Just like in real life, this may be good. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    If they kept it close to the HTML standards, it should make it possible to switch to a decent machine in the coming years, possibly months.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  120. Social Engineering. by jd · · Score: 1
    Kevin Mitnick's repeated point on computer security is that people are the worst vulnerability a system has. By "waiting for an engineer", what you are really doing is waiting for someone who can convince the bank that they're an engineer.


    I'm frankly amazed that someone hasn't started emptying ATMs by crashing the software and then convincing the bank that they're the engineer.


    From a security standpoint, the less people are involved, the better. The ideal would be for the system to have some diagnostics and monitoring tools. If you're running into an OOM error because some OS bug is causing a memory leak, then the software should be able to handle the problem quite easily on its own.


    If and ONLY if manual intervention is required should an engineer be sought, and then they should come armed with the output from said diagnostic and monitoring software, so they can fix the problem.


    What I suspect happens in reality is that a guy drives up, waves a card at the people in the office, opens up the ATM, hits a reset button, closes the ATM and drives off. No checks, no verification that the crash wasn't due to something more serious, nothing. If they're called back, maybe - just maybe - they'll swap the motherboard. The old mobo won't be tested or examined, it'll just be put in some storehouse to be used in case another machine breaks down.


    The use of "refurbished" (read - rejected by someone else) equiptment is amazing in America. It's never tested adequately, assuming it's ever tested at all.


    Frankly, given the choice of relying on a $4/hour tech to maintain the system, or a watchdog card and a decent set of self-diagnostics tools, I'd take the latter. Precisely because it is more secure.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Social Engineering. by bastardoperator · · Score: 1

      This has not happened due to the fact that the banks know that the human is one of the major flaws in any system. In order to correct this all banks use a two man system where you need at least two people to service anything.

    2. Re:Social Engineering. by grendel_x86 · · Score: 1

      Actually banks dont know better. Read 'Art of Deception' or 'Art of Intrusion' by Mitnick, and you will see this.

      Not all banks use a two-man system, infact, from when ive seen broken atms getting repaired, it is NEVER anything but a single person in an easily replicatable uniform.

      --
      Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..
    3. Re:Social Engineering. by jd · · Score: 1
      The only thing I want to comment on is the sig:

      Im glad /. isnt the real world, that would really suck..


      If Slashdot were the real world, celebrities would crash every time a newspaper was published.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Social Engineering. by jpc · · Score: 1


      Last time I saw some ATM machines being removed for servicing, they had the codes for the safes on the back stuck on with post-it notes.

      Not only that the codes for the 2 machines were identical, just reversed, and easy to remember (10 20 30 or something).

    5. Re:Social Engineering. by lgw · · Score: 1

      That's the funniest thing I've seen on this thread. It goes to show: the OS the ATM is running isn't really the big security concern here!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  121. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by cyriustek · · Score: 1

    There is good and bad with this.

    The fact is that many banks are doing this switch now. If you are a Wells Fargo customer, be glad they are not using Diebold. These are the ATMs that were shutdown via either SQL slammer or blaster last year. I do not remember which. Diebolds answer to this is not a patch management scheme or to properly write their code. Instead, they now sell a personal firewall for each ATM!
    Additionally, Diebold was barred from doing business in California due to their poor practices. http://www.unknownnews.net/031106comvot.html

    On the good side. This is a move that must be made. Many on the old ATMs do not encrypt their data at the keypad as is required from Visa standards. With their upgrades, they will.

    One should also keep in mind that if these have a proper patch management scheme, and are appropriately firewalled, and have good code, that this is no worse than you doing your banking online. As a matter of fact it is probably safer since their is not outside network gaining direct access.

  122. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows ATMs are all over the place.

  123. Does not dispense more then $640 by moanads · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Windoze enabled ATMs do not dispense more than $640. When asked about it, Bill Gates said, "$640 should be enough for anyone."

  124. This is the Most Retarded Thing I've ever heard.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay... lets start with a warninig... I'm a hardcore Linux Guy...with that said...

    Is this the most retarded thing you ever heard?

    Okay... OS/2 is.. well... get the archeologists out here to fix the damn thing. But a Windows? Okay I noticed that at my bank (no names here) they use Windows 2000 and Microsoft IE to connect their bank software?. ActiveX enabled!!!! I noticed this a week ago? and my first remark was "How horribly insecure!". Forget the fact that ActiveX is a smoldering pile of &%^ and a breeding ground of holes and security leaks? but one has to figure that if this software is accessed with IE and a Microsoft based network? that the webserver powering this is Microsoft IIS. Which as we all know is about as secure as (pardon the lame pun) a broken window.

    Now this loading of ATMs with Windows is sheer stupidity?for the following.

    1.) It wants to use TCP/IP
    2.) Runs a Webserver for a interface UI (50 bucks says its IIS.)
    3.) It uses Microsoft ?extended? protocols.

    Now this opens up some huge security holes here. Beyond the obvious? think about this scenario:

    Bank ?A? supports Online banking as a in-house service, with local servers. It runs a Windows based network (with teller machines) using IE and IIS for its banking apps. Then it?s interconnected to the ATM machines via the same windows system. Then being Microsoft? all the systems will be interconnected? and extended? Posing one very easy target for script kiddies hackers?.

    As soon as a exploit for IIS is found a script kiddie could ?potentially? get access to an ATM via the local network and load his pocket with a ^$$^ load of cash.

    No system is ever totally secure? but opening this thing up with Windows is just retarded. Thats my 2 cents!

    -Digital Madman

  125. Re:Fri, 1st April is TROLL REUNITING DAY by DAVEO · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    DAVEO agrease with you"re poost!! :)

    --
    -DAVEO
  126. My bank is doing the same thing... by plazman30 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work for a mid size bank and we are doing the same thing. We are getting rid of our OS/2 based ATMs and replacing them with ones that run Windows XP. The ATM software is gonna run in IE in kiosk mode. I don't believe that it is our choice to run this configuration. Our ATM vendor is passing this along to us as the new solution to our ATM needs.

    The patch management of these things is really becoming a nightmare, and we haven't even rolled them out yet!

    1. Re:My bank is doing the same thing... by echostorm · · Score: 1

      There is a Pool Hall a couple of miles from me that uses IE in kiosk mode for selecting music and other such nonsense. Every time I go in there I see that someone has hacked hardcore porn onto the screen...

    2. Re:My bank is doing the same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just further evidence that clueful IT professionals are consistently failing to succeed in career development to such an extent as to be in a position, say, of decision making authority for a banking infrastructure.

      Someone else *is* succeeding in achieving such a position, and it's not you. Why are IT so smart and know so much better, but can't get promoted to positions of authority?

  127. The real question: IBM isn't selling them linux? by smchris · · Score: 1

    I suppose they could still buy eComStation licenses if they were eccentric? But support has to be a major concern _now_, much less in a few years.

    OS/2 was a great home system for me from '95 through '00 but that was the '90s and it's time to give it up. Training people to maintain it on current hardware would have to be a pain. And the HPFS file system just isn't as robust or secure as NTFS.

  128. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LanManager code was the basis for both, and is still the basis for XP (although it has some layers of security built on top of an insecure protocol at this stage). However, on Windows, LanMananager code become integrated with the network stack and security code, causing no end to hacks. I never played with the OS/2 LanManager code, because there was no need to - FTP/Telnet/etc was a better way to go at the time.

  129. Learn to STFU. by jrockway · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "STFU" means "shut the fuck up".

    --
    My other car is first.
  130. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the network cable coming out the back? That would be completely useless to exploit, right?

  131. bad programming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the old OS/9 (6809) based ATMs were far faster than these.

    They were 8-bit processors at 8MHz or so. Having these new machines be less responsive than those is criminal.

  132. Blue Screens. by Jafar00 · · Score: 1

    Cue new websites with new pictures of blue screens on atms :D

    --
    RebateFX.com - Spread rebates for Forex traders
  133. Bay Area Wells Fargo all Diebold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They threw out the perfectly good older NCR ATMs and replaced most of them with Diebold, except for a branch on El Camino Real that has some new fangled NCR ones.

    The Diebold machines are a joke and a half. They are down very often and often en masse, and one time I was afraid it ate my card for about 2 minutes when it went haywire.

    When you want to die, do so boldly?

    1. Re:Bay Area Wells Fargo all Diebold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      except for a branch on El Camino Real that has some new fangled NCR ones
      Camino Real, El [Span.,=The Royal Road]. There are Camino Reals in most former Spanish possessions, including four in former Spanish territory in the United States. Probably the best-known American trail of this name, also called the Mission Trail, leads north from San Diego to San Francisco and beyond, running some 530 mi (853 km). The name is most commonly applied to the part of the trail north of Los Angeles. El Camino Real connected California's Franciscan missions and ran through such settlements as Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, San Juan Capistrano, Carmel, and Sonoma. The missions were mainly founded by two priests, Fr. Junípero Serra and his successor, Fr. Fermín Lasuén, in the period from 1769 to 1803. Together they established 18 of the 21 missions, many of them still extant and some extensively renovated, that flourished until the Mexican government ordered their secularization in 1833. Today, the surviving mission churches are houses of worship, tourist attractions, and icons of Spanish-American architecture. Route 101 follows much of the the old trail's route. The name El Camino Real also designates the 700 mi (1,100 km) New Mexican trail that was pioneered by Juan de Oñate in 1598 and formed the lifeline of Spain's New Mexican colony.
      from infoplease... I just felt that was something people would want to know...
  134. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by jbplou · · Score: 1

    You couldn't hack it in your whole life time without a true input device or somesort of magnetic input or network connection. You'll only have access to the displays they give you. What are you going to do cause a buffer overflow by holding down one of the 10 buttons they give you for input for 2 hours.

  135. And then the ATM ate my card.... by jeffroe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What a timely post! Today I got back from a week long contract job and went to deposit some checks at the bank. Well, the local Wells Fargo closes at 4pm and I just missed it by about 10 minutes, so I went to deposit in the ATM. I inserted my card as instructed and voila, a nice windows fatal error message requiring me to click OK, but of course no mouse to click the button with and the Green enter button does nothing. In fact, none of the buttons did anything. Eventually, the ATM rebooted itself and came up with a nice "This ATM is out of service." message, and of course kept my card. So, I called Wells Fargo customer service to find out how long it would take to replace my business ATM card and it's 7-10 business days!!! Ouch! Why exactly am I paying for a business account when I get the same service as for my personal checking account? I don't know. *sigh*

    1. Re:And then the ATM ate my card.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you paying for your accounts at all? Go to Washington Mutual and get them for free.

  136. Would this be a perfect application for Linux by MatthewNewberg · · Score: 1

    Linux is stable, and can be almost totally secure (only run the things you need, and put a very secure firewall on the box). Linux also has Mozilla/Firefox which should be able to render the same HTML as the Windows Boxes. For less money, and about the same amount of work the ATM company could switch over to linux perfectly fine. Wow, Microsft must have people totally brainwashed, or Linux must really suck at something.

    1. Re:Would this be a perfect application for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got serious probems when I try to run ActiveX in Linux... and many banks depends on them...

  137. I want to race the countdown by savage1r · · Score: 0

    When all these Wells Fargo ATM's get the next installment of the blaster worm I sure don't want to have to race the 'countdown to restart' message that comes up while I'm trying to deposit my check and get some cash out before the ATM reboots. By that point my pin and account number will already be tracked and my account will be summarily drained of hard earned finances and I shall run through the streets screaming like a little girl and waving my arms madly.

  138. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  139. It's the mainframe attitude... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it ain't broken, don't fix it. If an OS/2 based laptop is getting the job done, and there is no value add or return on your investment in running a windows/linux on these laptops... is it really worth it? Plus remember, when a new version of Z/OS comes out, it must support ALL the features of previous versions... the ultimate in backwards compatibility.

    These laptops run Communications Manager which in some of its abilities can emulate a 3270 terminal.. (yeah tn3270 does the same thing...)

    1. Re:It's the mainframe attitude... by idlake · · Score: 1

      That's the business attitude in general. The difference is that most products are so "cheap" that you really have to worry about the cost of suporting something like OS/2. That's why people port and move to other platforms, not because they enjoy it.

      In the case of OS/2, IBM probably has a dozen people there basically just to keep the software for those laptops going. For most other products, that wouldn't be worth it.

  140. Seriously - anyone notice slow ATM response time? by cshay · · Score: 1

    I use Wells Fargo in SF and have noticed that sometimes there can be a one second delay from when I push a button and when it registers. This started about a year ago. Could this be caused by the fact it is running Windows?

  141. MOD ABUSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone who posts a comment that violates the groupthink (that these new ATMs will cause people to lose money and all sorts of stuff) and gets modded down. I'm so surprised!

  142. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  143. Too late by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure there's a lot of holes that will be created because of this"

    I hate to say this... but there already are. It came with the creation.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  144. Webcams galore by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    now we can hack all those ATM cameras...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  145. ServiceOntario Kiosks by persaud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back in 1992, IBM and the Ontario Govt. prototyped ServiceOntario kiosks to provide DMV services (license plate sticker renewal and dispensation, address changes, vehicle abstracts, fine payments).

    Included digital audio and 30fps video. Special hardware was engineered to dispense license plate stickers. Not sure what the kiosks are running today, but in 1992 Windows couldn't cut it. The kiosks (advanced ATMS really) have won awards and have since been deployed into malls around the province.

    Read more about government and self-service kiosks here, including US initiatives. If you think about the nature of transactions being performed, such kiosks must be connected to multiple government networks, yet be located in public spaces. Legal, technical and process innovations were required to make this hybrid device possible.

  146. The real question is how secure are the VPN boxes? by barfy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Presumably the ATM/Windows XP part of the box is *not* connected directly to the network. That there is a VPN box/pair between the ATM and the home networks...

    ATM -- VPN -- Internet -- VPN -- Wells Fargo

    So the real question is how secure are THOSE boxes...

  147. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by greyhoundpoe · · Score: 1

    Try and search for 0S/2 exploits even with Google.

    However, if you try searching for OS/2 exploits...

  148. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    No open ports, no way to exploit it.

    I recoded tbe name section of my atm card to <A HREF="sploit.org">. Instead of saying "Hello MORCHEEBA" it'll have a giant link to my server with my hostile activeX ap. But, no open ports, so it's secure.

  149. This is nuthin'. Biomedical devices are happening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW. At the base of MRI's Sonograms, critical monitoring systems, etc is an OS...When Confidence, Integrity, Availability is comprimised with a typical computer system, the loss is measured in downtime, or dollars. When its a base for a life support system, or the system used to interrogate / program a pacemaker, the unit of measure will change.

  150. PlayDough (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patching ATM machines? How wierd is that? As a reference point, think about Bank Of America (BOA). Something like 16000 ATM's taken down due to a virus.

    Here is some common sense for all those bright (dim light) Windows Admins out there.

    1) Use seperate networks, jackass.
    2) Using a 16/32k DDS DS0 to pacth a system that might require 200 meg's in patches is just insane.
    3) Based on point 2, look for a different OS.
    4) Just because your kids can use the OS doesn't mean that it should be used for an ATM.

    As for point 4, my nephew can build a house out of lego's and playdough. I don't see the construction industry rushing to build houses out of the same materal. Hell, the builders would have an easy time scupting a building with a butter knife and playdough.

  151. Re:Lawsuit (IANAFL -IIRC) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    however, I do recall a recent case brought forth where a man is suing Bank of America? for his own vulnerable system. He had a keylogger on his home PC that was used by a Hacker to abscond with $90,000.00 . I don't know much of the details, but it's interesting.

  152. Wells Fargo History by can56 · · Score: 1

    I find it hilarious that Wells Fargo, one of the
    first banks in the US, and the subject/victim of
    countless stage coach robberies during the Wild
    West Era, are converting their (small collection
    of) ATMs to run under Winwhatever.

    I suggest that they: 1) post at least two shotgun-
    wielding gaurds at each station, and 2) get the
    posses ready, before they deploy.

    And of course, talk to Hollywood ASAP ... I can
    see a lot of cool remakes of of Westerns coming
    to your neighbourhood soon ;-)

  153. This was informative? by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Invariably, the ATMs have to talk to the Bank's internal network at some point. Even over a VPN, you can have a propagation of a worm... That's how the last little inconvienence against Windows based ATMs happened. The worm got a machine on the inside of the Bank's LAN and propagated to the ATMs that were Windows based- right over the VPN.

    It's a big deal. If it's going to be web-based on it's controls, etc., it will have exposed ports.

    Simply put, Windows really, really isn't suitable to task for this sort of job. Never was. As far as Microsoft's track record shows, it never will be.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  154. Cancel your accounts by avida · · Score: 1

    I'm going to be cancelling my accounts at Wells Fargo if I find their new Windows ATMs suck.

  155. That matters, but it's only part... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

    ...of the big picture. The ATM is not directly connected to the Internet, no. But, how secure is the Wells Fargo end of that picture? We've seen Windows ATMs get zapped by Internet Worms because of infections that somehow get into the corporate LAN of the banks and since the VPN makes it look like the ATMs are on a network segment with the corporate LAN, the Worm gets into the ATMs anyway .

    This has all the hallmarks of a BAD idea from the beginning as Windows isn't the right tool for this job no matter how you frame it because it's hopelessly insecure in ways far too numerous to count- and for financial transactions accuracy is job one and security is job two. I can believe that the ATM program works on the first nicely enough- it's not hard to do that sort of thing, really. I can't believe that they deal with #2 in ANY manner- not while you're building a fortress on a foundation of shifting sands.

    Better to use QNX, Lynx, RTEMS, or even OpenBSD or Linux than Windows. Much less shifting sands there.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:That matters, but it's only part... by jpc · · Score: 1

      Also in the UK cash machines are turning up in all sorts of dodgy convenience shops night clubs etc. I never use them. Very good practise for the hackers, as you can just tap the wire, check the physical tamperproofness etc. These will be hacked first.

  156. Microsoft hasn't lost your money yet by bazily · · Score: 1

    Not trying to be a Microsoft cheerleader, but I'm not sure the issue with a Windows ATM. If they're already using M$ for web servers, and you're using M$ to access their site, that's basically the same risk....

    Actually it's probably more risk, because I vaguely remember something that happens when I go an ATM - I put a freakin' card in the machine!

    --
    Why cut IT when your office space costs $3/sf? gibso
  157. Local bus company... by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    has Windows powered ticket vending machines. I stopped using them completely when one crashed just after my Visa card had been debited and before I got my tickets. This is NT4 powerd

    My bank has W2000 ATM and it blue screens at least twice a week.

    --
    realkiwi
  158. One infected laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All it would take is one engineers laptop infected with an undetected or 0-day worm and the whole game is over.

    Here in the UK we have dozens of different screens in town and city centres displaying the blue screen of death or some other nice Windows GUI popup... be it in the ATM you were about to use , or the shopping centre plasma display screens, train station concourse etc.

    not funny. not funny at all.

  159. "Windows Embedded" by idlake · · Score: 1

    Windows Embedded refers either to Windows CE or to Windows XP Embedded. They are almost certainly going to be running Windows XP Embedded on these machines. That is basically your normal Windows XP with a different licensing agreement that gives you more options for customizing it: it's mostly the same codebase, it mostly has the same problems (security and otherwise).

  160. Swedish bank using NT by siavash_of_stockholm · · Score: 1

    The Swedish bank FSB has been using Windows (NT) based ATM machines for a long time now. Probably a very stripped down version, but no matter how stripped down it is, you'll still get Windows error messages.

  161. Cool!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can surf the web, play games, and
    constantly watch my back for that brass-knuckles
    welding hoodlum all at the same time!

  162. Re:The real question is how secure are the VPN box by guet · · Score: 1

    Well, yes and no, assuming the XP system is stable enough to stay up and not crash in some unknown state leaving it possibly vulnerable to simple hacks from the keyboard.

    I wonder if you could manage a buffer overflow exploit from a mag-stripe?

  163. It has to be Diebold machines by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They make ATMS don't they? And no-one else would be stupid enough to put them on a public network when it is so easy to put them on a private network like we have now. How many dollars per machine do you need to save before it offsets the PR loss when the media reports instances of your machines getting owned? I suspect they won't be saving much at all per machine by putting them on the public network. If this sort of stupidity continues those bad movies about hackers getting into systems that should never be on a public network may become reality.

  164. ATM with Windows? "Hackers and Viruses Welcome!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They must be kidding to use the deprecated Microsoft Windows "OS" for ATMs! Bad idea and... very very very bad idea!...

  165. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by dbIII · · Score: 1
    You couldn't hack it in your whole life time without a true input device or somesort of magnetic input or network connection
    They have a network connection (to the public internet no less!) and another poster provided a link to photos of getting media player running and described bringing up a symbol entry app that can be used as a keyboard on a rebooted Diebold ATM. I've got no idea why they are shipping such things as production systems - where is the adult supervision?
  166. Re:The real question is how secure are the VPN box by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Presumably the ATM/Windows XP part of the box is *not* connected directly to the network.
    That is the sensible way to do it, but not necessarily the way it is done - it is not sensible to install windows media player on an ATM which has been shown to be on diebold ATMs. This really looks like someone has shipped the demo of their ATM software on a PC as a production system - just like their voting machines.

    If I was doing it and had to use windows and a PC, I would strip down the system of everything that doesn't have to be there and install a firewall and VPN card (there's embedded linux boxes on PCI card that make decent firewalls with a couple of types of VPN) which costs less than a standard windows licence, and use it to filter the VPN vigorously and let nothing else in. Obviously that is not done or they wouldn't have got a worm in their machines, and they wouldn't have had studnets playing Talking Heads samples in media player on one of their ATMs.

  167. Don't just push the penguin by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Linux is stable, and can be almost totally secure (only run the things you need, and put a very secure firewall on the box)
    There's lots of options, windows CE makes sense, an embedded linux distro, plus all the usual tried and tested embedded OS's. A firewall is nice, but I don't think the things should be on a public network in the first place - it doesn't cost that much to get the phone company to give you a line. It's not as is that much bandwidth is used in this application anyway, point of sale machines don't have to be on the public internet to get credit card verifications - a phone line is enough.

    I wouldn't blame Microsoft for a braindead management decision - MS sell an embedded OS for purposes like this, so the decision most likely came from someone at Diebold. I'll bet the bank is being treated as a cash cow and is shelling out a fortune for these repackaged PCs.

  168. Windows on ATM's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is very old news... seen it for 4 or 5 years now...
    ...and Web enabled != Internet connected
    ...and the connection is a "closed group" ADSL, the other end of the ADSL is not connected to the Internet but to other ATM's and to the bank.
    ...and yes, that means that a worm in the bank will close several if not all ATM's

  169. Propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's more than Linux with a high maintenance contract...

    Oh man... you actually read MS-funded blogs like that? You're just giving Bill hitcounters to gloat over.

  170. Security Guard Theft by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    The biggest security threat to Automatic Teller Machines comes from those that service them. From the installers, to the guards that load them with money, these folks are the ones stealing money and identities.

    If you, as a supervisor, fail to perform background checks, you may find yourself missing a whole bunch of money. And the security guards will tell you "Aw, these Diebold machines always count wrong" as they pocket thirty bills per week.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
  171. time to get your amstrads out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... with a card thing so we can get some spare change from the atm machines... nothing like terminator 2

  172. If they do this... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

    it doesn't really affect me, as I'm up here in the frozen North (Canada to you guys...) but it DOES worry me quite a bit. The powers that be in Canada have to be some of the stupidest peeps I've run across, and running Windows (in ANY version) across an ATM network would be ludicrious... not only are our (majority of) IT prof's able to deal with the expected -- nay, required -- complications, but neither are they competent enough to ensure the safety of the people and monies involved. Let's stop this now, and NOT let Windows into our environment, without the capable and reliable solutions that we need.

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  173. Benefits the riaa too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You download mp3's on the atm and they get a complete audit trail with your account details

    yay!

  174. Free Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoo

  175. So, this is what we have come to. by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The ATM makers are making themselves obsolete. By providing low security publicly accessible terminals running windows, they've made them less secure than your home computer doing internet banking. Because, at least when it's in your house, you can do some due diligence in ensuring that your computer is secure. The only reason for ATMs is for getting money. Which is of minimal importance when just about everyone accepts bank cards for payment. You could even visit the bank once a week and take out cash for those smaller transactions where you can't use the bank card.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  176. This just in... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 2, Funny

    US banks are going to start using ziplock bags instead of safety deposit boxes and "very strong wooden boxes" locked with Master brand locks instead of vaults. And instead of expensive security vans to transport money, they'll be using bike curriers. More news as it develops.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  177. Finnish ATMs run NT4 by rsmeds · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Otto-ATMs in Finland have been running Windows NT 4 for years. AFAIK, the UI itself is a Java-applet running in Internet Explorer.

    And yes, I've seen the IE on them crash, leaving the standard NT4 desktop, error dialog, and a command prompt window.

    Scary.

  178. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Well, you're right of course. But to me, Diebold's popularity with the banking/credit industries is just one more indication of the contempt with which those industries hold their customers. It's not hard to hire an outside engineering firm to audit a supplier's designs. Was that done with Diebold's equipment? You would think that an organization as conservative and nominally responsible as a bank would insist upon it. Maybe they do ... but I find it hard to imagine that any reputable firm would have given Diebold a pass on their Windows-based designs.

    One can't help but think that this is a tip-of-the-iceberg situation. Diebold provides consumer-interface equipment (and has been in the public's eye over their voting machine fiasco) so naturally it will receive more attention than all the behind-the-scenes communications technology and other services that make ATMs work. How truly secure (or otherwise) those systems are is anyone's guess. If there was ever a place for rigorous Federal quality-of-service standards this is it. The phone system used to be regulated and had to maintain a specified QOS or get penalized, but I don't know if there's anything similar in the banking world. If not, there probably ought to be. I'm not ordinarily one who is for more government involvement in anything, but honestly what else has the power to make these organizations clean up their act? Obviously, us poor consumers can't do jack, since we're getting screwed by the ChoicePoints on the one hand and the Diebolds on the other. Equally obviously, until our current administration leaves office nothing will happen either.

    I think the big problem is that banks and credit card issues are willing to tolerate a certain level of fraud, a certain amount of "collateral damage" (i.e., us) before they will make any concerted effort to improve. My understanding is that they pay their insurers to cover their losses due to fraud and don't worry themselves too much about it.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  179. I can't wait! by cephus440 · · Score: 1

    For the popup ads during my ATM transaction! Can you imagine the joy of the marketing deparment when you can just push this button and it will automatically deduct the funds and ship to your address on file!?

    I'm going to change my savings to gold now.

  180. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the computers that the bank uses to control the things may be. You just need to infect them to do bad things to the ATM's.

  181. LOL WHAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the straw-man that broke the camel's back?

  182. NT was also originly known as "portable OS/2" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it was mostly written in C as opposed to the mostly (all?) assembly that OS/2 was written in. In addition, when an early version of NT would crash (didn't happen very often - it was pretty bullet proof compared to the other Windows versions) sometimes the errors still said "OS/2 error..."

  183. take a penny, leave a penny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This fits right in with the rigid Wells Fargos "take a penny, leave a penny" company policy.

    (truthy) not long after refinancing w/ WF, we got a letter saying our mortgage records were on a laptop that was stolen from WF and would we like to buy mortgage insurance to prevent fraud ?
    yeah - sure. riiiiiight.

    Mmmmmm - That's mighty good bungling Wells Fargo !

  184. Serious vulnerabilities? by scseth · · Score: 1

    Not trying to be flamebait, but aren't most of the new windows-based vulnerabiities through email attachments (and people who continually open/execute them?) or flaws in the IE browser? If this is a version of windows that is well patched, RPC and other extraneous services are disabled, uses a personal firewall, is it really going to be that vulnerable?

  185. Sounds like a big bunch of FUD to me by flanman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ATMs (in Canada and I'm assuming the US) run on a private X.25 network. Moving off OS2 to windows or linux or BeOS should make no difference as to their security as these boxes are seriously locked down and disabled to the point that they'll only communicate with boxes that they're set to communicate with.

    You might get the BSoD now and again but they should be pretty secure.

  186. They should've hired me... by vmalloc_ · · Score: 1

    I applied for a computer security consultant job for Wells Fargo a while ago and never got it. Lets pretend I got the job, and I'm talking to the guy that's telling me they're going to do this:

    "Okay, how can I put this so you completely understand me... You plan to put Windows on ATM machines, use a universal protocol standard, and then hook it up to the internet? Okay, how do I begin... this is a REALLY STUPID IDEA. This is an INCREDIBLY DUMB IDEA. You WILL get hacked. You -WILL- destroy the credibility of your bank. And to top it off, it will cost a ridiculous amount of money. Any questions?"

    I'm in the process of starting my own Security Consulting company right now because I got sick of looking for jobs, so when they get completely hacked maybe they'll contract me to fix it. I'm not immediately sure what I'd recommend instead, it's definetely something you should put a lot of thought into, but Windows is definetely the wrong direction here. You don't use the second most hacked system on the internet to secure your bank transfers.

  187. More Full time staff required for Windows support by t482 · · Score: 1

    I was involved in a OS/2 Migration for a Canadian bank. The business was shocked when they found out it was going to cost them 2 million more a year to support the windows infrastructure. In particular more full time staff were required for Active Directory management, security, and new version of the software for ATM management was required(Pegasus).

    From some research I did a while ago the Windows has an api for financial peripherals. In particular the cash feeding machine (the guts of the device). Java also has a similar api. No such thing exists for python - but I suppose you could use Jython.

  188. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly!!! The fanboys need to get more experience in this field before they latch onto linux or some other false tech savior. Any and all os's are vulnerable, people invented tech so therefore people can hack tech, it's that simple. Too bad geeks do not compute when it comes to the common sense bigger picture.

  189. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok then what would you use smartguy!! Linux, OS/2 they're just as hackable goof ball!! Give a hacker time and access and anything programmed is hackable. You must be jealous of Gates bigtime. I'm no Gates fan but I do know what hacking is and what it takes..

  190. Normally, I'd laugh at this news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I'm (still) a Wells Fargo customer!

    hmmm.....

    1. Re:Normally, I'd laugh at this news... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      > but I'm (still) a Wells Fargo customer!

      One of the big strengths that keeps me a WF customer is the way they have fully embraced the online aspect of banking. The ATMs aren't any more a risk than the (excellent) online services the bank provide.

      They are telling Diebold to cram it in their asses, and making a solution that THEY control. This is a good thing.

      There are political arguments against Windows, but an embedded windows system that is subjected to good QA and security auditing isn't really going to be any easier to hack than a closed system like the other banks use.

      WF has put together a pretty good user interface for their ATMs. So they used Windows instead of VXWorks or QNX.

      I'm with you on the political aspect, but I can't make myself automatically assume that a system built on windows is naturally insecure. I certainly cannot make an argument that I'd be comfortable taking to a bank board of directors, or even one that makes a sufficient case for me changing banks. I *like* the new ATMs, I have no irrational fear of SSL-enabled transport protocols, and the few people I know on the inside of Wells Fargo assure me that it's a great place to work, has clueful management that isn't out of touch with IT, etc.

      I'll take WF over Bank One *ANY* *DAY*.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  191. The cable box is a bad example. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for Scientific-Atlanta, and a people used to complain all of the time about delays between pressing the channel change button and the channel actually changing. That wasn't the fault of the cable company or the cable box maker. It was because with the crappy new digital channels (hello idiots, video is analog!), you have to wait until you receive a key frame before you can start showing the picture. Every digital (crap) compression (synonym for throwing most of the data in the garbage) algorithm has this problem. Analog is still the media of choice for video, just as it is for high-end audio.

  192. a Gartner man dissing Redmond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not April 1st already, is it?

  193. Somebody tell Well Fargo ... by mobilemic · · Score: 0
    Could somebody please tell the guys at Wells Fargo two things:

    1. Great idea. It will have more than just a few problems.

    2. Don't set these things up in Germany. They'll be hacked by guys in high speed trains.

  194. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by jbplou · · Score: 1

    You mentioned from the input on the ATM is what you implied with your post about the college terminals. If you are talking through the network port than yeah I don't disagree that it is hackable. But any type of system with a network connection is hackable.

  195. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by dbIII · · Score: 1
    Equally obviously, until our current administration leaves office nothing will happen either.
    If they stay in office long enough eventually they will realise that they are supposed to govern and can't sit back and blame everything on a previous administration - so there is hope no matter which party has the numbers.
  196. They are also configured for remote upgrading! by herbierobinson · · Score: 1

    All I can say is I don't have any account with them... And it's a really, really good thing.

    On the bright side, we probably won't be seeing many more phishing exploits from the Russian hackers now that they have a more lucrative target.

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  197. eCS as alternative OS (Re:was a change required?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ahh, OS/2, I miss it. The last time I whipped out my OS/2 Warp disks and tried to install it, it didn't seem to like my 10 years newer hardware and couldn't find a HDD driver. Bummer. I can only imagine how fast it would have run on my 2GHz box."

    Ah, problem is that drives had exceeded the size limits in the mean time. But the original poster knew that I suppose. Even Linux and Windows had to create new drivers to support the newer drives.

    > Try the Danis506 drivers, et even has got some SATA support.

    If you need newer drivers for those bigger disks (in 10 years something changed) perhaps IBM would supply them to you for free. But better is of course the free DANI drivers mentioned here. But where to get them? Of course a t the great Hobbes.NMSU.EDU OS/2 repository.

    > eComStation runs rather nice om my 1.8Ghz Athlon XP - Barton box, especially with the new kernel.

    Perhaps we need to explain what eComStation (eCS for short) is. It is a workstation OS build on (and improved from) OS/2 under an license agreement with IBM by Serenity. It can be found at www.eComStation.com of course. And bought at various places, i.e. www.Mensys.NL.

    best regards
    from Leeuwarden
    Peter van Dobben de Bruijn

    (p.s. I am definitively not an "anonymous coward" just trying to save my energy and time by not creating a special account just for this one time intervention).

  198. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  199. Why use an ATM at all? by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

    I have quit using ATM's altogether for a number of reasons. One of the main reasons is that I have found it easier to manage my finances by using a credit card to pay for everything(even groceries) as there are many CC's out there that give you miles/reward points for purchases. Also with credit cards you don't get change back and your risk of loss is less if the card number is compromised.
    I take my paycheck and use part of that to pay off the balance on the CC each month. So I never need to look for an ATM and don't have cash in my pocket or pile up change.
    Also, the risk to your account is actually greater from the cons who have developed the devices which they attach either to the front of the card slot or actually within the machine that grabs your card number while you are transacting and is invisible to you. Then they take the card numbers and spend...I don't have the links on hand right now but there have been many documented instances of this. Essentially, I don't believe that ATM's are secure at their sites or through their network connections.

    --
    "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
  200. Re:Not a good thing for bank users .... by not-real-sure · · Score: 1

    The windows bashing crowd has come out in force for this article. Any OS that is left open will be exploited. My FC 3 box got r00ted within 3 days of being connected to the internet. Granted it was my mistake that allowed it to happen. Take the article at face value and learn something from it. In next 10 years I wager that 95% of the ATMs out there will be windows based. Bitch all you want about it but you will still be getting your money from it. And who knows maybe the federal government will then take aim at MS and the hackers for being stupid about things.

    --
    My Doom. The gift that keeps on giving
  201. Where did Linux come into this? by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    I thought the article was about how legacy OS/2 ATMs were being switched out with (shudder) Windows XP/web based equipment--from a company notorious for the shoddy quality of its voting machines. Where does Linux come into the picture.

    Quite frankly, it isn't the fact that WinXP is the OS that primarily scares me. What scares me more is

    * These machines will be web based, possibly connected to a public network. Even if they utilise a VPN, the fact that a machine that gives me money and updates my account balances could be on the same network as some dense 2nd-assistant bank manager that opens all attachments marked "joke". It also bothers me that overworked IT staff of questionable competency are responsible for making sure the VPNs/firewalls/etc are correctly configured.

    * Banks that harbour this herd mentality and all implement the same platform, from the same small handful of companies. It's true that no platform is completely secure, but if there is only a single platform then one hack can take out everything. You make this point yourself--if Linux had 90% marketshare then it would be a primary target too. Fact is, however, that even within the Linux platform there is healthy diversity--there are a multitude of choices in distros, window managers, applications, etc. In a Microsoft-only shop, there is one OS, one dominant browser, one dominant office suite.

    * Diebold has been notoriously opaque about its development practices. It had to be cajoled into letting 3rd parties examine its election equipment, and to my knowledge no agency (banks, government or otherwise) has driven them to have their code vetted by a 3rd party. Open source by definition allows any interested party to examine the inner workings of a system, however closed systems can be opened to a limited amount of 3rd party examination too (Microsoft even has "shared source). It'd be nice if Diebold was known to be as open and forthcoming as even Microsoft.

    If the general public were fully aware of the direction banks were going with their ATMs they would be very uncomfortable. Windows, IE and the web already have a reputation for being dangerous enough to make people cautious about online shopping. If the same nasties that foul up Joe Uesr's PCs start making ATMs die with increasing frequency it'll be a disaster. In Canada at least, major nationwide disruptions in banking service due to "upgrades" have already angered the public. The last thing we need is for the special "embedded IE" to crash and leave inoperative ATMs at the "start" button and such things.

    And no, this isn't the "linux fanboy" in me talking. This is me looking at the situation with a critical eye. This "modern" Windows-and-IE based solution has a shoddy track record to this day. At the airport, for example, the screens showing arrivals and departures or what flight was unloading onto what baggage carousel, NEVER, EVER used to crash. They were plain-looking, colour-but-text-only displays driven by who-knows-what platform (UNIX, OS/2, maybe even DOS?), but they did the job without issue. Now, we have very fancy flat screens with beautifully rendered displays, but if you fly frequently it is quite a bit more common to see one of these systems betray their Windows roots with "access violations" and start menus, login screens and the rare BSOD.

    The result atht he airport is amusing at best and slightly annoying at worst (gotta find another screen to see how long your flight is delayed maybe). On an ATM however, it makes one worry--what if it crashes after I hit "OK" but before I get my money? What if it doesnt give me a receipt before it crashes? Is my balance still OK? With web-based banking at home, I can reboot and log-in again to see where it left off. At an ATM, I don't have the login or even a real keyboard to do that. If these are indeed WEB ATMs, what kind of mechanism is there to ensure data integrity/atomicity and give feedback to the user should there be a problem with the browser?

    There is a time and a place for this platform...ATMs are not one of them.