Slashdot Mirror


More on Sony's "DRM Rootkit"

A couple of days ago we posted a story about Sony DRM installing a rootkit. Since then we have seen many more stories on the subject that I thought were worth sharing. manno gave us a link to the inquirer and salemnic sent us a page from the washington post. smallfries gave us one from PC Pro. It's nice to see this story not getting lost in the cracks since the implications are gigantic.

608 comments

  1. Sue by alecks · · Score: 1

    So is it or isn't it enough for a lawsuit? Anyone know of any developments in this area?

    1. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't enough for you to sue, because Sony can afford to drag the case out forever and you can't handle that amount of lawyer fees.

    2. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So is it or isn't it enough for a lawsuit? Anyone know of any developments in this area?

      A lawsuit on what grounds? That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement? I have a feeling that the "oh, no one reads those things" isn't really going to work all that well against Sony's legal team.

      Hereis a link to F-secure's "detailed" writeup about what the DRM installer puts on your machine.

      Don't buy DRM'd CDs as they don't allow you to exercise fair-use. Sadly, most people don't care anymore.

    3. Re:Sue by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Based on the grounds that it re-routes the windows instructions on how to play *all* audio CDs. If you remove the DRM by force, you lose the ability to play other music as well.

    4. Re:Sue by Celt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nice that you've read up on the matter,
      It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    5. Re:Sue by Donniedarkness · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "A lawsuit on what grounds? That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement? "

      I think the issue here is that Sony does not tell you that they are installing the software ANYWHERE. In addition to them adding the software without your permission, its software that can create a "safe haven for viruses" (the software makes everything that has "$SYS$" in the filename turn invisible), according to the PcPro writeup.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    6. Re:Sue by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Informative
      As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.


      Umm, nice to see that you didn't read the EULA either.
      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    7. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs

      I assume that you were trying to somehow infer that I didn't read the EULA? Well, I did, but I'll post the important part of it here because it's fairly apparent that you did not, or at least didn't fully comprehend what it said:

      As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.

      See that part about "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted"? That's what people agree to when they click "I agree" on the EULA screen.

      As far as being able to uninstall it via "add/remove programs", I wasn't aware that this made software dismissable via legal grounds. I thought it just meant that you could proudly wear the "Made for Microsoft Windows" on your retail box.

    8. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      this EULA was MODIFIED after the story has surfaced - so if you are going to claim reading the documents - at least try to get the right ones.

    9. Re:Sue by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      I don't even understand how this is any different than what Windows already does. Its just autorun all over again.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    10. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Sadly, most people don't care anymore. "

      You have got that backwards. Those who know what DRM is cares.
      The problem is that not many people know about it.

    11. Re:Sue by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      From the PCPro article: "Once a CD protected by Sony's DRM is played in a PC, an End User Licence Agreement is presented to the user which defines the terms of use of the CD and must be accepted. But it fails include details of the rootkit, and the installation of this code which subsequently occurs happens without the user's permission."

      Interesting that in light of this you loudly say, "That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement?"

      Before you get all high and mighty, you might want to figure out what is actually going on.

    12. Re:Sue by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The EULA is expected to be limited in scope to restrict access to the specific tracks purchased on the CD.

      The GP was stating that it affects ALL cd activity from that point onwards.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    13. Re:Sue by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some lawyers seem to think so.
      On Mark Russinovich's Blog, at least one guy claimed to be a lawyer and he asked California residents who were affected to contact him about a lawsuit.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    14. Re:Sue by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Interesting
      There is no way for a normal user to remove the software. It comes with no uninstall program, nor is it listed in the windows add-remove programs.

      If you can manage to find the hidden software files and do delete tehm as suggested in the EULA, you will no longer be able to access your CD drive.

      Funny how no mention of those points are made in the agreement.

    15. Re:Sue by Nic-o-demus · · Score: 1

      Ditto. From TFA

      " I checked the EULA and saw no mention of the fact that I was agreeing to have software put on my system that I couldn't uninstall. Now I was mad."

    16. Re:Sue by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, it says "software", but it doesn't say "I agree to allow Sony to install software commonly associated with hackers that may infringe upon my computer's security". And I think that'll make a bit of a difference.

    17. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      this EULA was MODIFIED after the story has surfaced - so if you are going to claim reading the documents - at least try to get the right ones.

      Well, the research that we were able to do came from a site that has been highly regarded as one of the most well researched and documented about this issue. If their copy of the EULA is what we have displayed, then I would father that it's the "correct" copy. Perhaps Mark Russinovich isn't really the guru and expert on this issue that Slashdot and multiple posters claim he is?

    18. Re:Sue by _bug_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not stated in the EULA that this rootkit will be installed, plus there's no way to uninstall it through add.remove programs.

      You can contact Sony directly and they will send you tools to remove the DRM software.

      The F-Secure blog talks a little about this. It appears their removal software installs ActiveX controls.. just really messed up.

    19. Re:Sue by loconet · · Score: 1

      From the linked page:

      "The DRM software requires administrative privileges to be installed successfully."

      Does that mean that only a person with administrative privileges gets to listen to the CD on their computer? or will the cd play even if the DRM software was not installed? If it's the former .. wow, why on earth are people still buying CDS from this company?

      --
      [alk]
    20. Re:Sue by dangerz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sadly, most people don't care anymore.

      The other day, I was driving with my fiance when we got on the topic of cd's. She proceeded to tell me that there's this great cd that I need to get because the band is really good. I proceeded to tell her that I haven't purchased a cd for almost 4 years now because of my dislike for the RIAA. After explaining everything to her, she just got all flustered and said that she didn't care about all that crap. She didn't care that even though she paid for the cd, she didn't fully own. She didn't care about all the bully tactics the RIAA uses. She didn't care about any of that, she just wanted the music.

      I agree with you that the majority of the people just dont care. As much as I try and inform people of all the crap the RIAA pulls, it just goes in one ear and out the other.

      For now, I suppose I'll just continue on with my silent protest.

      --
      The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
      - Albert Einstein
    21. Re:Sue by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Go ahead. Sue. Make some lawyers happy. After years of litigation and after millions of dollars are spent, Sony says 'nolo contendere', settles out of court and you get a free CD for your trouble.

      Or, better yet, don't buy a Sony music CD. Sony gets sued all of the time for various reasons - it's part of the cost of doing business. Their stockholders are used to it. A significant drop in sales will be far more likely to get attention.

    22. Re:Sue by i_am_not_a_bomba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't buy DRM'd CDs as they don't allow you to exercise fair-use.

      If 'fair use' is a natural right then any entity that attempts to crush that is criminal.

      Your attitude is lazy, here's some fun with it; don't like not being able to sit up the front of the bus, then dont ride on the bus.

      Don't like the cancer from the toxic waste dump in your town, then leave.

      Don't like to have the police perform secret searches on your home, don't buy a home, dont move into that town, state, country, etc.

      Facile examples but they are along the same line of thinking. If an entity is actively stamping on peoples natural rights then that entities behaviour can be forcefully stopped by society, through the power of government, one of the things that government is supposed to exist for.

      There seems to be some strange thought pattern here that nobody must let the idea even cross their mind that a corporations' behaviour may be wrong and that it is ok to put a stop to it through Government. Somehow a fairly large group of people have decided that corporations should have less responsibility to a country than the citizens that it is supposed to benefit do. That the only thing that lowly citizens should be 'allowed' to do is *absolutely nothing* (which is exactly what a 'boycott' is, total and utter inaction).

      Undoubtably this thought process is a mutation of various anti-communist, anti-socialist and pro facist (in the true sense) ideologies coming to their logical end..

      Your argument is also objectively pro virus/spyware and malware. Using your argument any virus or malware author, to be safe from prosecution simply has to show some form of EULA, something that has been joked about here often but dismissed as absurd. (You probably didn't make that connection in your rush to promote your ideology).

      --Awaiting the flurry of half thought out responses misinterpreting my words.

    23. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does disabling autorun stop this from being installed?

    24. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the form for submitting a complaint to the
      Federal Trade Commission:

      https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_C ODE=PU01

      Do it now! If you are legitimately outraged, provide your real information.
      Describe the problem in layman's terms. Be professional.
      Inundate them with complaints.

    25. Re:Sue by citadelgrad · · Score: 1

      I agree, don't buy DRM. I was superpissed when I bought the new Dave Matthews Band album and I could put it on my iPod. You can copy WMA files and play them on your computer but that's lame. What if I want them in a WAV or other lossless format. Piss on them.

      I'm no lawyer, but I play one on TV. My girlfriend is in Law School, and I've posed the question 'Can they enforce these EULA?' She seems to think that EULA would not always stand-up in court. A normal person can't reasonably be expected to read these multi-page legal disclaimers. If your product can harm people or their property putting warning on the package doesn't always get you off the hook, especially if the company knows ahead of time that the product can cause damages. These damages don't necessarily need to be physical harm to the property. They could violate your rights, privacy etc. Cigarettes have warnings and people have sued and won.

      It would be a tough row to hoe. A little fodder to start your day.

      --
      Losers whine about doing their best ....

      Winners go home and f*ck the prom queen!
    26. Re:Sue by Alphabet+Pal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Additional items from the EULA:

      • On DAYS when we can't get our cars started, you agree to COME BY our houses in your CAR and pick us up. You will fully compensate US for any time lost DUE to being late to work.
      • On every third FRIDAY, you will report to our company CAFETERIA and cook and serve FOOD to us.
      • When we are low on MONEY, we will stand outside your house with a BLACKJACK, hit you over the HEAD with it, and take your WALLET.
      • We reserve full pillaging RIGHTS to your wife and ATTRACTIVE children.
      • You agree that you will not LISTEN to purchased CD.
      --
      Because you can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"
    27. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 1

      You have got that backwards. Those who know what DRM is cares. The problem is that not many people know about it.

      Nah, when I tell people about it they still don't care. Even after I started attempting to tell people about the evils that were to come people just shrugged it off.

      I guarantee that 99% of people that use a CD like this in their machine will have no problems with it. That's what matters. That the majority doesn't understand the implications of EULAs, software like this, and the further erosion of their rights due to the smear campaign forged by the corporations.

    28. Re:Sue by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I guess this makes Linux the superior CD-ripping platform... at least until Linux distros become autorun-happy and DRM software is ported to the infinite flavours of Linux.

    29. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 1

      On Mark Russinovich's Blog, at least one guy claimed to be a lawyer and he asked California residents who were affected to contact him about a lawsuit.

      First off, a lawyer will do just about anything to make money and that includes getting a group of people together to talk about suing via class-action.

      Second, how the fuck did you get modded up for talking about someone on the Internet *claiming* anything? When the lawyer actually makes the press-release (and you know they will) and you post a link to that, then you should be modded up. Until then, let's keep it to the facts.

    30. Re:Sue by shams42 · · Score: 1

      Or how about... both? I'm definitely not buying ANY more CDs from Sony, and I also hope they get taken to task over this in court. No conflict there.

    31. Re:Sue by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 1

      This is great stuff, we should thank Sony. Whereas most media companies chip away at our rights little by little, Sony have waded in, done a big steaming dump on them and planted a day-glo flag into it!

      I hope all of you at work have sent the article to IT security pointing out that Sony audio cds will get their Windows boxes r00ted :-)

    32. Re:Sue by trentblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not to sound trollish, but perhaps you should reconsider this marriage?

    33. Re:Sue by trentblase · · Score: 1
      I was superpissed when I bought the new Dave Matthews Band album and I could put it on my iPod.

      Yeah I agree. DMB sucks. :-P

    34. Re:Sue by trurl7 · · Score: 1

      So...this being slashdot and all that, I am forced to ask two questions:

      1) (OB) Is this a real flesh-and-blood girlfriend? ;-P (as I said, this *is* /.)

      2) Did you break up with her over this?

    35. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not just his wife but most people who dont care.

      and if this stuff causes their computer to stop working guess who they call to clean it up (again) :-(

    36. Re:Sue by rishistar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Can't you sue for the product not technically being an audio CD in the first place? Maybe I'm mistaken (and if I am I'd like to know) but an audio CD meets certain standards detailed in the Red Book that anything with DRM in fails to meet. So some shop is bound to advertise Sony CDs as audio CD's ergo that retailer can be sued perhaps?

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    37. Re:Sue by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement?

      Agreed to "something" is right. I have to wonder if most people reading the agreement would believe they agreed to the addition of the type of software Sony used. Based on the outrage expressed by many (even technically minded) users, this is not what they agreed to.

      If the company isn't being up-front with the customer, IMO they do open themselves up to a lawsuit. Contrary to what many people seem to believe, the law doesn't look kindly on people being deceived or misled -especially in civil court. You can't sell someone a ham sandwich and not disclose the fact it contains dog poop, just because the menu says it "contains a special ingredient".

    38. Re:Sue by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I think there is a market for a small Linux distro which will load itself to RAM {thereby allowing the CD to be ejected}; then wait for a music CD, and copy the tracks to a USB-storage device or something similar. There is no need for an X server, so everything probably could be kept quite small. In fact, there probably is room on a 1GB device for the OS, the CD tracks themselves as .wav files and maybe even the .mp3s. I would imagine that in countries where mathematics cannot be patented, even a pre-compiled LAME is legal.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    39. Re:Sue by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You only need to sue if there has been a violation of civil law. What Sony have done violates criminal law on several counts -- it is deception, misuse of a computer, criminal damage and aiding and abetting the misuse of a computer. Don't call a lawyer, call the police!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    40. Re:Sue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      So maybe one of these newly taunted spyware or malicious program laws might come into play.

      I don't see this as any different then a virus writer seeding his first infection or some one intentionaly trying to infect a certain computer for whatever gain.

    41. Re:Sue by JoeZeppy · · Score: 1
      I sent a brief synopsis of the story to CNN news tips and my local AP bureau, hoping to get some mainstream press comverage on it. Maybe more of us should do that. Just remember to keep it brief enough to read in 10 seconds,and relevant enough that someone will think it's a good story idea.

      Haven't seen too many mainstream hits yet, but the story is growing. I hope they get a lot of bad press over this.

    42. Re:Sue by Alcilbiades · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You clearly haven't been reading the articles. Others have stated what the EULA was and it wasn't changed to include information about the hidden malware until after these articles started getting out. Furthermore, just because it is in a EULA does not make the EULA valid or legal. A company can put lots of stuff in the EULA it doesn't mean they hold up in court. Most cases in the US regarding EULA's have come down to judges dictating that they are far to restrictive and illegal.

    43. Re:Sue by austad · · Score: 1

      Jebus! That's what my girlfriend did when I explained it to her. Hmm...

      She's engaged??

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    44. Re:Sue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It apears that has already happened in the EU. I forget wich country but they are not allowed to sell DRMed cds as cd and they have to have some visible warnging label on it.

    45. Re:Sue by arminw · · Score: 1

      ......I guess this makes Linux the superior CD-ripping platform......

      What happens if a Mac user puts one of these crap Sony disks into their computer? Our users don't have admin rights to install software. Does that mean the CD won't play? If not, does it state somwhere on the label that this CD will only play on Windows systems? A normal audio CD, when inserted, brings up iTunes and then it can be played or ripped and copied to iPod. Does the Sony DRM prevent Windows users who legally buy their CDs from playing the songs in their iPod?

      --
      All theory is gray
    46. Re:Sue by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1
      Yes, it says "software", but it doesn't say "I agree to allow Sony to install software commonly associated with hackers that may infringe upon my computer's security". And I think that'll make a bit of a difference.

      They couldn't say that! Their sales would plummet!

      --
      You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    47. Re:Sue by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't removing the DRM be a violation of the DMCA?

    48. Re:Sue by Pakaran2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In an ideal world, that would be the case. In this one, the police aren't going to go after a corporation which employs tens of thousands of Americans because they did something to individual users' computers. And if they did, Sony can afford to drag it out in court forever (the same way Exxon is still dragging out the Exxon Valdeze fine - they don't need to pay it until the case is closed).

    49. Re:Sue by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      why can i never be part of these lawsuits damn it... curse not living in california, land of the lawyers.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    50. Re:Sue by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Although sony waded in and dumped a big load, I don't think it will bother normal consumers. Well maybe not untill repair shops or anti virus companies start telling them they cannot do somethign or thier computer keeps getting hacked because this rootkit is actualy a virus.

      Most users don't even know what root is let alone a rootkit. The plain simple fact that this rootkit is a virus or as close as possible to that class without crossing over will never enter thier mind. If people started saying sony records installs a virus on your computer or it installs the ability for a virus to hide from any existing protections then they would get alarmed. Untill then, it is just somethign only geeks and semi geeks will understand (wich means about no actual law makers will get it).

      I like the idea of the I.T> department telling users it is forbiden to use these cd's on the computer at work because it installs a virus. This will get the mainstream news acting like it is the next "I love you" virus.

    51. Re:Sue by radu124 · · Score: 1

      I think there's a lot of spyware that asks for your agreement, relying on the fact that most people don't even read the agreement.

      I don't think this makes it legal.

    52. Re:Sue by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      Can't you sue for the product not technically being an audio CD in the first place?

      Unfortunately, you can't sue for that. I looked at the CDs in question at the store, and they do have a warning that the disc is "copy protected". It's on the back, in small print next to the FBI warning logo, but it is there.

      That being said, given that Sony/BMG feels that they need to resort to Black Hat hacker root kits to "protect" their precious Music, I have decided to no longer purchase (or allow my Daughter to purchase) any Sony/BMG products since the CD could contain malware that could damage our computers. I'm not sure if a class action suit can be brought against Sony for this root kit, but I can certainly tell everyone I know about the dangers of using Sony/BMG products in their computers. Word of mouth can hurt as much as a class action suit if enough people take the time to tell everyone they know.

      Boycott RIAA is a good site to learn more about the Music Labels and the crap they are pulling these days.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    53. Re:Sue by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Nah, she'll outgrow the 'must have pop music' phase. And until then, it can become a geek's treasure-hunt to find non-RIAA stuff she likes.

      And anyone that gets too selective or too calculating about life/sexual partners deserves their long lonely life. My wife respects/tolerates about half of the things that I consider important, but it'd be utterly insane to divorce her just because she likes the worst stuff on the scifi channel or shops at Walmart. Likewise, I respect her decisions on stuff that matters to her, without having to share her view completely.

      Besides, chances are the girlfriend was defensive because she felt besieged. I've got a teenage nephew that argued with me a year or so ago about Lars Ulrich being a RIAA toady... he'd never heard of the issue. Since then, my nephew's taken an active interest in the topic, started listening to a college/alternative station, and is shifting his tastes accordingly. Maybe it's like confronting any other junkie: Anger and denial are first. Then comes bargaining, then finally acceptance/change. (the Depression stage is infrequent, since college radio and indy/alternative/live music is a helluva lot more gratifying than methadone or goin' cold turkey.)

    54. Re:Sue by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      I think the issue here is that Sony does not tell you that they are installing the software ANYWHERE. In addition to them adding the software without your permission, its software that can create a "safe haven for viruses"

      Oh, but they are telling you they're doing that... check the EULA :

      YOU EXPRESSLY ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT YOU ARE INSTALLING AND USING THE LICENSED MATERIALS AT YOUR OWN SOLE RISK. THE LICENSED MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTY, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND, AND SONY BMG, ITS LICENSORS AND EACH OF THEIR LICENSEES, AFFILIATES AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES (EACH, A "SONY BMG PARTY") EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, TERMS OR CONDITIONS. EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, SATISFACTORY QUALITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT AND FITNESS FOR A GENERAL OR PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

      There, you see... no warranties about what it does and whether it does it right. What's more...

      You shall defend and hold the SONY BMG PARTIES harmless from and against any and all liabilities, damages, costs, expenses or losses arising out of your use of the LICENSED MATERIALS, your negligent or wrongful acts, your violation of any applicable laws or regulations, and/or your breach of any provision of this EULA.

      Not only can you not sue Sony, but you have to defend them when people say Sony is bad.

      God bless the EULA.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    55. Re:Sue by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.


      IANAL, but you aren't one either.

      If you want to be technical about it, then this is exactly the line your argument fails (which you also quoted). The licence clearly states that it will not be used at any time to collect personal information.

      This is a completely false statement - as described in many other Slashdot postings, it facilitates trojans and worm distribution by allowing themselves to prepend $sys$ to their name. Given that hiding those files is a primary purpose of the DRM, there is no case where Sony can declare such situations to be unexpected - at best, they can deflect damages to whatever fly-by-night company that developed the DRM in the first place.

    56. Re:Sue by kwandar · · Score: 1

      Why Sue? Why not look it up in the criminal code, then call your local Attorney General, and let him/her go to work? :)

      (I'd do this myself, but this doesn't work nearly as effectively in Canada, I'm afraid)

    57. Re:Sue by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      "We reserve full pillaging RIGHTS to your wife and ATTRACTIVE children."

      ...the right to steal from them?

      Did you perhaps mean "raping" rather than "pillaging"?

    58. Re:Sue by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Does that mean that only a person with administrative privileges gets to listen to the CD on their computer? or will the cd play even if the DRM software was not installed? If it's the former .. wow, why on earth are people still buying CDS from this company?

      Maybe because most people don't even know there's a "safer" mode that one can run Windows without administrative priviliges? Such DRM rootkits are possible because the average Joe has no clue about :

      • admin vs. user
      • what DRM is
      • what a rootkit is
      • all the screwing up the customer that is taking place

      Face it, only geeks care about that stuff. Sad indeed, but true.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    59. Re:Sue by tootired · · Score: 1

      Amen, my brother.

      We are so dazzled and distracted by the shiny things these corporations put out that we seem to have abandoned our suspicion of them.

      We sit and complain about things we have no control over and fail to raise any stink whatsoever about the things we can control. We are in control over what company is successful. We are in control over who gets elected. As a collective we have abandoned that control, and seem to think of it as an esoteric relic of the past.

      Stand up, don't buy sony's shit, complain everywhere and to everyone. If enough people complain, the sheeple will notice.

    60. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately, you can't sue for that. I looked at the CDs in question at the store, and they do have a warning that the disc is "copy protected". It's on the back, in small print next to the FBI warning logo, but it is there.

      Also, these non-CDs usually lack the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logo.

    61. Re:Sue by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moreover, it says when you terminate the agreement you have to remove ALL parts of the software. Sony hides part of the software and makes it hard to impossible for you to fulfill your obligations under the contract. They didn't tell you beforehand and there's most likely a law against that (putting a clause into a contract while actively hindering the signee from fulfilling it, forcing him to commit a breach of contract). Entrapment? Otherwise it'd be too easy to put some impossible (but on first glance harmless) clause into a contract that triggers upon termination and causes the signee to unknowingly violate the contract and be liable under the damages clause. Imagine AOL implemented that into their service contract.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    62. Re:Sue by Valacosa · · Score: 1

      I don't usually do "me too" posts, but I really wanted you to know that this is the funniest thing I've seen all day. Thanks.

      --
      "Live as if you'll die tomorrow." Ridiculous. You could die later today.
    63. Re:Sue by lazn · · Score: 1

      Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted.

      Also they mean that it is YOUR COMPUTER that must be removed or deleted, not the SOFTWARE.

      ==>Lazn

    64. Re:Sue by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The best music is often the tunes that address social injustice and protest against oppression. Other music extolls the beauties of nature, love and mankind in general. This has always been so.

      If this woman just likes to bop to the beat without a thought for the struggles of the human race, with no concern over the protection of the future of the art, then maybe you should question if she even "gets" the music she is recommending.

      Maybe you should find someone with a bit more heart than a mindless primate that simply likes to bounce to a thumping bass or gaze at a shiny object.

      Personally, I am glad my wife both understands and is passionate about social issues. It's the same passion that bleeds over into everything she does and keeps our marriage strong.

      Disclaimer: I speak only to the description in your post. I do not know your fiance, who may have plenty of other positive traits.

    65. Re:Sue by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The really crappy part is, is that this only hurts the legitimate users. People who wish to pirate the CD will just pop it in a Linux computer and rip it. Or they will just disable autorun on their CD drive. I'm not sure about this method specifically, but this seems to bypass every copy protection mechanism i've seen on music CDs. The rest of the users, are stuck out in the cold, using crappy players that come on the disc to play the CDs, as well as not being able to copy the CD onto their hard drive. Which kind of violates your fair use rights, depending on how you interpret them. Not to mention the fact that they have software on their computer that may be hard to uninstall, and may be doing things the user doesn't want it to do.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    66. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, the FBI is interested in Computer Intrusion. See their website to report criminal activity on your computer.

    67. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> you will no longer be able to access your CD drive.[.....]

      . ....From your Windows Based OS. You'll want to boot from the Ubuntu, Knoppix, DamnSmallLinux or SUSE Live linux CD to gain back your freedom. Perhaps you will want to install a freedom based OS like Linux instead of using a restriction based OS like Mac or Windows.
      (and before anyone whines like a girl about linux: a) it's 'ready' b) freedom isn't always easy.)

    68. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoseware !

    69. Re:Sue by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Circumventing the DRM, extracting the data and telling everyone how to do it (so much for Free Speech, eh?) is, removing the player isn't.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    70. Re:Sue by salemnic · · Score: 1

      By Jove, I think you've got it! Marriage is entirely about the time you spend together making your life better, and not subsuming each other!

    71. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dictionary would hold you in good stead.

      "The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48"
      Pillage Pil"lage, v. i.
            To take spoil; to plunder; to ravage.

    72. Re:Sue by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      Corperations have trained us well. We have come to think that right or wrong doesn't apply to business. If the companys are doing whats right for the stock holders then thats all that matters.

    73. Re:Sue by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      This EULA says nothing about the software hiding itself from the user's eyes, about it soaking up resources constantly, about it being difficult to uninstall without at least a BA in Computer Science.

      "Software" is a fairly nebulous term here, but some of these things, to this layman's eye, may be actionable. Of course it'd take a laywer to know and even then, maybe not. Hmm.

    74. Re:Sue by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      They couldn't say that! Their sales would plummet!

      Hah, reminds me of the best line ever from Liar Liar --

      Fletcher: Your honor, I object!
      Judge: Why?
      Fletcher: Because it's devastating to my case!
      Judge: Overruled.
      Fletcher: Good call!

    75. Re:Sue by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Several people have jokingly suggested you find another fiance. At least, I hope they are joking! :)

      But let's look at the situation: you're choosing to stay in a relationship with someone who supports the RIAA's business. You know that she's doing business with them, and choose to stay with her in a supportive role as her partner. Does that mean you are supporting the RIAA's business too?

      Another thing. You say she didn't care that she didn't fully own the CD. Does it matter? She gets to listen to the music - which is all she or anyone else wants from a CD. Why should she care about an irrelevant abstraction which in her experience doesn't affect her, such as "owning"? Even here on Slashdot there are plenty of people who'd like the very idea of owning music to be abandoned, while listening continues.

      My take on it is that I care, because of how it affects other people, limiting some peoples' freedoms to enjoy music the way they want to; and moreso because it propagates the unpleasant memes which takes away our freedom to do other things, such as freedom to share our own creative works composed of all we learn in life. I couldn't care less about "owning" a CD, though.

      -- Jamie
    76. Re:Sue by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      That thing's still going on? It's been 16 years!

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    77. Re:Sue by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      For now, I suppose I'll just continue on with my silent protest.

      Being silent about it prolongs that against which you're protesting....

    78. Re:Sue by m0rph3us0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, he just wrote the book on how to detect rootkits, and play with the internals of Windows. Maybe Warner Von Braun isn't the rocket scientist slashdot makes him out to be. I'm sure that cutting and pasting text from a EULA would be beyond him.

    79. Re:Sue by fredNonesuch · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, Sony seems to be responding to all the heat already. I found a readily available link to the ActiveX control-based uninstall mentioned above: http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/updates.html/. Note that I'm not endorsing the use of this tool as it requires allowing another Sony software tool to run on your system via IE and, as was noted above, puts more ActiveX crap on your system.

    80. Re:Sue by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thanks for proving my point.

    81. Re:Sue by redcone · · Score: 1

      The basic problem with a class action lawsuit for a problem like this is that the lawyers involved would make millions while the affected users would get a couple of coupons for 20% discounts off of their next Sony CD purchases.

      --
      http://redcone.net
    82. Re:Sue by syousef · · Score: 1

      Let's see, she doesn't share your life views, which is bad enough when you're trying to make a marriage work. But worse, she doesn't respect nor care about your views.

      There are lots of /. fools suggesting that it's not important, and that if you are that "picky" you deserve to be lonely. This isn't the case for a number of reasons:

      1) If/when you have kids you'll want to teach them your values. If you and your partner have different values this is harder because either you have to teach two different points of view, and this will confuse the child, or one of you can't pass on your view to your children. If she doesn't even care about or respect your views, good luck with that one. Expect to be in court fighting for custody one day, and perhaps having kids you pay for or can't see. Don't underestimate this. I've seen it fuck over a few aquaintance's lives.

      2) If/when times get really tough (and if you're buying CDs, not scrounging for enough food to eat or struggling to stay afloat financially I'd suggest they're not that tough), you end up having to decide what's most important to you. Your values become very important then, and you have to choose between things that you find really important e.g. Do I sell myself out or harm others so I can eat? If your life partner's views are incompatible with yours these tough times will break you, and you'll end up enemies.

      3) When times are easier and you're suppose to be having fun, you'll always have that nagging feeling that she doesn't give a shit about what you think or feel. Doesn't sound like she'll want to compromise at all. Welcome to the world of "Lots of her shit, none of mine" when it comes to what you want to do and your spare time.

      4) A man is judged by his values and the company he keeps. If your wife is a superficial twit, you look worse, people will think worse of you, and you won't attract the friends and other company you want. Instead you'll attract a lot more vain, shallow people.

      If the general masses of /. don't think these things are important I'd like to know what they're smoking.

      I recently got engaged. I did mention and we discussed that I don't like diamonds due to the whole conflict diamond thing. My fiancee would have taken sapphires or rubies but in the end she did want diamonds (and hell if we're talking about slave labour all my laptops in the last 8 years have been Dells! ;-) so it's not like I've never compromised on a principle - this is the real world after all). In the end, since this was a one off thing, I got her a decent diamond and a more expensive ring than I agreed. But she at least asked where these diamonds came from and though I'm not sure if I believe what she was told she did get some assurance they weren't from conflict mines. (I think they were Canadian). Here's the other thing, though she'd have been disappointed and did buy into the whole engagement ring (and eventually wedding ceremony) thing, she takes my views into consideration every step of the way. If I put my foot down I know I could have gotten a cheaper ring. If I insist on a cheaper ceremony I know she'll still marry me. I know she won't be as happy with it so I'm not going to do that to her, but I couldn't be with her if I thought she was only hanging around while she got what she wanted. That makes all the difference to me.

      So you see I'm not saying your values have to be identical. My fiancee's and mine aren't, and few people will ever find that. What you have to have is mutual respect for each other's opinions, and enough common ground to reach a compromise. If never buying music from RIAA related companies is important to you, and she won't even give the idea the time of day, and if that's the trend with all your beliefs I do suggest you consider un-proposing and head for the hills!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    83. Re:Sue by GrungyLotG · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, entrapment can only be done by law enforcement. There's a different term for non-Police relatetd incidents, but I can't recall its name.

    84. Re:Sue by filtur · · Score: 1

      We reserve full pillaging RIGHTS to your wife and ATTRACTIVE children.

      That one's called the Michael Jackson clause.

    85. Re:Sue by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, see e.g. this Wikipedia article

    86. Re:Sue by Drachemorder · · Score: 1

      Why can't you just decline the EULA and treat the CD as a normal audio CD?

    87. Re:Sue by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      # On every third FRIDAY, you will report to our company CAFETERIA and cook and serve FOOD to us.


      I accept this term. However, be advised that on said Fridays, the food which I will be cooking and serving to you will be meat dishes only. And by reading this message, you are agreeing to require without exception all personnel in your employ who are of Catholic faith to dine only in your company cafeteria that day, and consume no food other than what I and my minions serve.

      Coridally,

      Satan.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    88. Re:Sue by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      > or allow my Daughter to purchase

      good luck with that one, what are you going to do, ground her ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    89. Re:Sue by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      A lawsuit on what grounds? That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement?

      Actually, yes. If I take my car to the mechanic shop, and I sign an agreement that I won't hold them responsible for incidental damage to my car, and that I agree to let them fix it, I still have rights. If they return my car with the hood ripped open and destroyed, explaining that it was easier for them than opening it the regular way to get to my spark plugs, you can be sure that I'd win in court. Having "software" install itself on my computer, changing system files to become invisible, not registering an uninstall, and acting in a manner contrary to the best practices of software installation is not what a reasonable person would expect with such a software installation, and therefore is actionable.

      That your legal knowledge is insuffiecient to grasp this point does not mean the point is any less valid.

    90. Re:Sue by martinX · · Score: 1

      Any marital subsuming should only happen in the privacy of a locked bedroom. With the curtains shut. And the kids at Aunty Flo's.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    91. Re:Sue by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      > BA in Computer Science.
      is that a slam? trying to say the Science in computer science is not really science, but a art?
      (my first grammer police post, but I thought it was funney, sorry.)

    92. Re:Sue by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      And anyone that gets too selective or too calculating about life/sexual partners deserves their long lonely life.

      I don't know. I wouldn't want to be married to someone who wasn't smart enough to care about important issues. This is an important issue.

      For example, when I explained to my wife exactly how evil Disney is, she agreed with me instantly: "No more Disney products in our house." When the kids ask for the latest Disney film they get a short lecture on not doing business with the prince of darkness.

      Had my wife thrown her hands up and said, "Who cares about all that political stuff. I just want to see Mickey Mouse." ... well, she wouldn't have, because I would never have married someone so shallow.

    93. Re:Sue by plj · · Score: 1

      The problem is, that those discs most likely actually meet Red Book standards. The first generation of copy protections didn't, but I think that nowadays discs just have standard data tracks added to them, and the activation of DRM relies entirely on Windows' autoplay. Skip autoplay, and the disc behaves like normal CD with a data track on the end of it.

      What is really evil is, that they could even slap the Compact Disc – Digital Audio logo to such a disc, because the disc is technically OK.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    94. Re:Sue by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Something important to remember about rootkits is that they're not viruses meaning they don't just "appear" on your computer - you have to install them.

      And if all the program's used for is DRM then I don't know why they're trying to hide the process (which is something characteristic of a rootkit and some viruses). Not like you didn't know that you're playing MP3's or something like that. Why's it trying to hide itself - a process named "sonydrm.exe" when you're running "Sony DRM Tool" shouldn't be considered suspicious.

      So yeah, maybe they told you they'd install the software - but they didn't tell you that they'd try to hide it like it's a virus or some other sort of malware. And you wouldn't expect them to try and hide it.

    95. Re:Sue by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Adults that proxy-boycott childhood treats kind of amuse me. The intentions are good, but having had childhood friends that'd smuggle non-vegan snacks into their bedrooms, raid our fridge, and that grew up resentful because their parents denied them pop culture feeding via cable TV... nothin' says lovin' like subsuming your family into your belief structure.

      That said, I'm as guilty as the next guy: we tried boycotting Barney the annoying, plagarizing purple monster. Realized the futility when our kids ran up to a TV at Sears shouting excitedly "look, it's YuckyBarney!"

      Disney's a mixed bag.... While mostly negative, they're more gay-friendly than many employers, some things they've been slurred over (rereleasing Song of the South, particularly) are no-win situations they just wisely refuse to engage themselves in, etc. I *agree* they've got a stance on IP that is gravely harming society, they are hypocrites (always lobbying to extend copyright just enough to never quite reinstate copyright royalties to 19th century works like Rudyard Kipling's, for example), they're managed by a corporation that seems utterly soulless at times, and I've never gotten over the chutzpah they exhibited by announcing plans to turn a civil war battlefield (and not some meaningless field anywhere else in America) into 'Disney's America'... but I also love great animation too much to not impart that love (and the eventual lecture on my bittersweet 'love/hate' opinion about Disney) to my kids.

      Put another way, are you willing to boycott all good early pixar stuff if (when!) Pixar goes evil?! I'm in the throes of a similar internal debate *today* thanks to George Lucas and yesterday's Ep III release.

      GP was talking about ditching a fiancee because art-appreciation (lets temporarily stretch this concept to include pop music) didn't jibe well with RIAA hating. In the REAL world, love really has very little to do with consumer spending habits. If your wife had looked at you with puppy-dog eyes and said "But honey, I grew up wanting to be Ariel", would you really tell her she couldn't buy the new extended-edition DVD to share with your daughter?! It isn't just intelligence at stake; emotion and intelligence aren't so tightly coupled that a 'right' answer necessarily exists. Heck, nothing's that cut and dried...

      BTW, the Prince of Darkness is no longer CEO at Disney...

    96. Re:Sue by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      If your wife had looked at you with puppy-dog eyes and said "But honey, I grew up wanting to be Ariel", would you really tell her she couldn't buy the new extended-edition DVD to share with your daughter?!

      Err, uhm... *fumbles around nervously* .. OK, you got me there.

      Actually -- going off on a tangent here -- I'd never tell her she can't buy something. That's one of my big issues. How many men have to ask their wives for permission to buy something? If only I had a quarter for every time I heard, "Man, I'd love to get one of those, but my wife won't let me." Usually in regards to inexpensive (>$200), harmless toys, from people who can easily afford them.

      I wouldn't put up with that from any woman, and likewise, I wouldn't expect her to put up with it from me. Every couple ought to have a budget whereby x dollars in spending money are allocated to each person, and neither gives the other grief for what they purchase with their money.

      No; if my wife honestly wanted to buy Disney stuff with her portion of our spending money, that'd be her decision, not mine. My attitude was directed mostly to the grandparent's comment,

      After explaining everything to her, she just got all flustered and said that she didn't care about all that crap.

      I just can't fathom being married to someone who doesn't care about these things. It's one thing to break down and buy something - I "had to have" the LOTR collection. It's quite another to be willfully ignorant of the issues, to simply not give a damn. If she's like this on media, chances are she's like this on many other important issues. Imagine statements like, "I don't care how the health care system works! I just want to see doctors when I'm sick!", or, "I don't care about taxes and elections and politics, I just want roads to drive on!"

    97. Re:Sue by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "People who wish to pirate the CD will just pop it in a Linux computer and rip it."

      You don't need Linux to do this - they actually make machines specifically for copying CDs and DVDs. Any program/machine/OS that's capable of making a bit-for-bit copy of the CD (as opposed to just copying the files or tracks) can copy it - unless it has the stupid rootkit installed. This includes just about any Linux distro (K3B can do it, and I believe XCDRoast and whatever GNOME uses can too), most Windows programs (I know Nero can do it, and I'm sure Roxio can too), Macs (sorry, don't know what the hell they use but I'm sure it's capable), and those disc-copier machines.

    98. Re:Sue by E8086 · · Score: 1

      I would never wish a virus or spyware or anything like that on someone's PC, but it would be interesting to see the backlash against Sony if the holes their DRM rootkit opens becomes widely exploited and lots of people claim they got a virus or their computer was "hacked" no thanks to the hidden "features" secretly installed by Sony.
      I've been disabling autoplay since a friend gave another friend a cd with an autoplay executed virus. He didn't get the autoplay right but the concept is the same.

      --
      F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
    99. Re:Sue by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "the majority of the people just dont care."

      I don't know about that. I think people are just used to it and put up with it. I'm a teen and I know that while most of my friends don't complain about paying $20 or whatever for a CD, most of them wouldn't even think twice about copying it off someone or asking someone who owns the CD to copy it for them.

      I don't buy many CDs either. But I think the main driving factors in whether or not you're going to steal it or buy it are:

      (a) Is it shit? There's a lot of stuff on the radio that, quite frankly, really sucks. The last CD I bought (well, it was actually 2 CDs) was Led Zeppelin's Greatest Hits. I didn't mind paying $20 for it because first of all, all the songs I recognized on the back of the case were songs I liked, and second of all, there were 2 whole CDs so there were bound to be songs on there I liked but had never heard. I don't mind plopping down $15-$25 for a CD that I know will be worth it, but not for some crap where I only like one song on the CD.

      (b) Is it cheap? I don't mind paying $5 for a mix CD as long as the CD's got a couple good songs on it and the rest aren't horrible.

    100. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered mp3tunes or mindawn? You could also use something like iTunes, I think there is some sortware out there to extract the aac into mp3 form without the drm.

      I haven't bought a Cd in over five years, the only ones I've gotten since then were given to me and I only accepted them if they didn't include any form of DRM.

    101. Re:Sue by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      And that brings me full circle to the other thing I mentioned: one of those lessons that I had trouble learning: sometimes, people disagree with you out of defensiveness or similar reasons. Rather than offering up a take-no-prisoners bit of speechifyin', you have better luck if you give 'em your opinion, your reasons, and some time.... and one day *presto* you hear them pop off on someone else: Don't you know that [optBrand] is EVIL, you insensitive Clod!

      Oh, and I swear I got a spendthrift gene. Dad/Sis/Bro/I all are terrible with money. Can't find a 12-step program for it, but luckily my mom, wife and brother-in-law are frugal and a bit militant about budgets.

    102. Re:Sue by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Gah, you are correct sir. My bad, serves me right for posting while in a hurry.

    103. Re:Sue by dogfriend · · Score: 1

      Reportedly, you can just rip into iTunes on a Mac. The DRM software won't run on a Mac, so it is ignored. I haven't tried this, because I refuse to buy any CDs with any type of copy protection.

    104. Re:Sue by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine whipped up a custom Debian installation that did just that. Insert CD, automatic CDDB lookup, automatic rip via LAME, automatic file naming and tagging, CD pops out.

    105. Re:Sue by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      Can someone sue Sony for making their non-Sony software starting with $SYS$ disappear? Perhaps all future software I write will have the filename $SYS$.exe

    106. Re:Sue by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Nah, when I tell people about it they still don't care.

      Matter of time. Keep talking about it to them. Sooner or later they will run into it. At that moment they should remember what you said. The next time they will be more likely to believe you when another issue comes.

    107. Re:Sue by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I'm kinda interested! Pray tell me more .....

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    108. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you rip out the DRM rootkit it does not merely prevent you from playing music CDs, the entire CD system breaks and can't read anything.

    109. Re:Sue by cmacb · · Score: 1

      It is in fact from a Monty Python sketch about candies containing dead frogs, steel spikes, larks vomit and other unpleasant things.

    110. Re:Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I'm Homer Simpson.
      Uh-Oh Spaghetti Oh's!
      Bin Laden loves rootkits and disabled firewalls in newclear power plants.

      Lets drop a Fat Boy on Sony! (after everyone countersues the RIAA OOB!)

    111. Re:Sue by LarsG · · Score: 1

      See that part about "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted"?

      How is this any different than the EULAs that spyware / adware companies use? "Decent" adware does at the very least provide an accessible uninstall option.

      "until removed or deleted" would lead the average user to expect that it would show up as an item in control panel "add/remove software". Instead it is a shoddily written rootkit / CD filter driver that is known to cause problems. If you had done a search for "aries.sys" before Fsecure/Sysinternals broke the story, you'd find lots of forum posts wondering how it got installed on their system and why it is causing bluescreens. Fsecure has mentioned that inserting the CD "spectacularely broke Windows Vista", XP Media Center seems to be badly hit, too.

      Aries.sys registers itself as a service by the name of "network control manager". The other parts of XCP also use confusing or misleading names, making it difficult to discover where the files came from. To any seasoned system admin, these are typical clues that would lead one to think it is rootkit'ed malware or adware.

      So, lack of proper disclosure (a line in an EULA should not be enough, by that standard a lot of adware / spyware would also be ok), a regular user is completely unable to understand the consequences of installing XCP. No accessible uninstall option (unless you consider running a rootkit scanner, identifying the files as coming from First4Internet, discovering that it was installed through a Sony CD, finding the right place on Sony's website to request the uninstaller, registering with ZIP, email and phone number, being called back by a Sony representative and then sent the uninstaller through email as accessible). Not to mention that bluescreens happens, and due to XCP installing itself as safemode drivers you pretty much have to do a complete Windows reinstall if you get problems.

      This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  2. Regardless of where this goes... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if this doesn't go to court, at least this is getting some attention... and ANY bad attention for DRM makes me happy.

    --
    Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    1. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Scoria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People seem amazed when they learn what DRM technology is capable of. Interestingly, I'm afraid that most casual readers wouldn't understand the implications of DRM, even if it actually received a substantial amount of press. I know that "rootkit" isn't the most commonly used term.

      In fact, to a casual reader, it would almost seem as though anything with an acronym such as "Digital Rights Management" would be designed to protect your digital rights. It's entirely misleading.

      If all else fails, Sony can always use a scapegoat and proclaim that the managers had no idea any of this was happening. An unknown malicious programmer must have done it all!

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    2. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by xtracto · · Score: 4, Informative

      You may be interested in my signature... and my XCP affected Album list.

      Hope this helps!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it would almost seem as though anything with an acronym such as "Digital Rights Management" would be designed to protect your digital rights. It's entirely misleading.

      Yes it is.
      That's the point, it's got a double plus good word in it's title, so it must be good!
      For other examples of this: PATRIOT act and "operation [adjective] freedom"... how could ANYONE oppose them without appearing anti-freedom to the uninformed?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by WTBF · · Score: 1

      An unknown malicious programmer must have done it all!

      The thing is they purchased this off another company and so it would have been in their accounts that it was there, and in a company that large a purchase like this should have had to be approved by management.

    5. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would be really good is if someone could determine if the upcoming Kate Bush CD has this rootkit-DRM on it, and if so post on the major Kate Bush newsgroups about this outrage.

    6. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "operation [adjective] freedom"

      You mean "operation [remote nation full of brown people] freedom".

    7. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Quaoar · · Score: 1

      Well, I was going to boycott this CD in protest...then I realized that no one wants to listen to that crap anyway.

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    8. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by rileyjt · · Score: 1

      The Story is now being covered on the front page of Google's News aggregator (news.google.com).

    9. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Bezben · · Score: 1

      She's on the EMI label I believe, rather than Sony BMG.

    10. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You mean "operation [remote nation full of brown people] freedom".

      I think they were calling it "enduring" freedom at some point.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    11. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Fratz · · Score: 1

      Great job compiling that list! But I wonder why they're putting XCP on CDs that hardly anyone cares about. Testing the waters, perhaps?

      --
      -- Fratz, human
    12. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be "(the) Enduring Operation Freedom". Whoops -- time to duck and cover.

    13. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1
      Now Pete Seeger on this list is just the height of irony. He was the grandfather of the folk revival movement. His ethos could be best approximated as "music belongs to the people" and as a folk artist has covered, had covered, innumerable songs. His most popular songs were all made popular by other artists. The entire folk ethic of sharing and preformance over recording flies in the face of this type of content restriction.

      I actually met the man last year at the Clearwater Folk Festival in Croton, NY. He is very old but I wonder if he knows/what he thinks about this... I doubt he would be very happy with the situation. I also agree that this is the surest way to put Sony in a pinch. Let the artists know that you aren't buying their album because Sony has 'infected it with DRM.' If artists (especially well established ones like Seeger) complain that is certainly more powerful than me telling Sony they have lost a customer.

      I also dug up one of Seeger's famous quotes:
      "Plagiarism is the basis of all culture." Seeger quoting his father. (not completely applicable in this case but close)

    14. Re:Regardless of where this goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First the RIAA sues my 92 grandma for a MegaDeth Torrent. WTF ?
      Now Sony wants to use Celine Dion to RootKit gramdma's Dell. FWTF?

  3. Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We Got Root

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by sremick · · Score: 1

      It's just the beginning of a new product line from Sony

    2. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 4, Interesting
      They do... This is their Minimum system requirements for content protected discs:
      To listen to the music on this disc, you need a PC with the following minimum system requirements:
      • One of the following operating systems: Windows 98SE, ME, 2000 SP4, XP Home or XP Pro
      • Pentium II or higher with Windows 98SE, Windows ME
      • Pentium III or higher with Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Pro
      • at least 64MB RAM above recommended OS memory level
      • CD-ROM/DVD-ROM disc drive
      • Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher
      • Microsoft DirectX 9.0 or higher with non-Windows XP systems (download)
      • Logged in with Administrator rights
      .. you need to be root to listen to music. Just amazing.
    3. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory:

      All your boxen are belong to us!

    4. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, my friend.
      I'm sure that next version of Windows (Vista?) will have that pre-installed for you.

    5. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by acoustix · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Logged in with Administrator rights"

      I guess that means that no one from my company will be listening to DRM'd CDs. I don't even let my users have "power user" rights.

      -Nick

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    6. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they just gave away a winner to some lazy virus makers:

      To read the text in this email, you need a PC with the following minimum system requirements:

              * One of the following operating systems: Windows 98SE, ME, 2000 SP4, XP Home or XP Pro
              * Pentium II or higher with Windows 98SE, Windows ME
              * Pentium III or higher with Windows 2000 SP4, Windows XP Home, Windows XP Pro
              * at least 64MB RAM above recommended OS memory level
              * CD-ROM/DVD-ROM disc drive
              * Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher
              * Microsoft DirectX 9.0 or higher with non-Windows XP systems (download)
              * Logged in with Administrator rights

      The message is in the attached file. Please open and run it.

    7. Re:Maybe Sony Should Print This On Their CD's.... by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      In Sony Corporation, our CDs PWNS J00!

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
  4. Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "infected with DRM"

    Love it. Great phrase. Maybe it'll catch on.

    1. Re:Hope it catches on by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For god's sake, yes. ./ we are all now responsible for spreading a new term "infected with DRM." A bad publicity spin is a better way to combat DRM than actaully explaing it to Joe Sixpack. The word infected implies that it's bad, christ I've met people who think viruses are like human viruses (no one makes them they just happen). Leave the tech speak at home, just dumb it down to three words: infected with DRM.

    2. Re:Hope it catches on by fireweaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      mc900ftjesus (671151) wrote: "DRM." A bad publicity spin is a better way to combat DRM than actaully explaing it to Joe Sixpack. The word infected implies that it's bad, christ I've met people who think viruses are like human viruses (no one makes them they just happen). Leave the tech speak at home, just dumb it down to three words: infected with DRM."

      I would tell Joe Sixpack something like this: "Joe, if you try to play one of these CD's that's got that copy-protection or something else called 'Dee-Are-Emm' on it, it will put viruses into your machine that will not only fuck it up completely, but cannot be gotton rid of. That is because the record companies are in cahoots with the hackers and spammers to rip you off. Do you want to take that chance?" You might also want to add a little punch to this by telling somebody's sad tale of woe.

      I think he would get that, and I don't think it is misleading.

    3. Re:Hope it catches on by gerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Infected with DRM"


      Again, I must state that whenever I clean a computer with Adaware/Spybot/AVG/Panda Activescan/CWShredder/ect, I'm now going to have to ask one more thing:


      "Have you bought and played any music CDs lately?"


      How sad is it that doing something so legal can become associated with other computer slow-downs as spyware/malware/adware. This is what is going to irk the general public, and hopefully get people to look at DRM a bit more closely.

    4. Re:Hope it catches on by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 1

      Tantalizing as it is, I really don't think spreading FUD about DRM is really an ethical thing to do. Moreover, manipulating people by giving them misinformation about computers seems likely to backfire down the line - big corporations can be manipulative, too (how hard do you think it'd be to just rebrand DRM?), and probably all you're going to do is make dumber computer users. I think the average user is bound to run into DRM sooner or later and get pissed off when he can't do whatever it is he's trying to do, legit or not. You won't need to convince anyone that it's annoying.

    5. Re:Hope it catches on by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Who will be the first Slashdotter with a signature infected with DRM?

      On a side note, I've had about 30 google searched hits on my blog concerning the Rootkit story, since I posted it the other day. It's by far the most searched for term finding my blog, and I'm not even a solely tech oriented blog.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    6. Re:Hope it catches on by acariquara · · Score: 1

      Sure, take the high road and have your rights packed up your arse. I will fsck record companies as much as I have to, if that's what it takes to get our voice heard.

      It's not paranoia if they are really trying to get you, ya know...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    7. Re:Hope it catches on by laughing_badger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fantastic term!

      Me: That CD's infected with DRM

      Friend: What's DRM?

      Me: Digital Restrictions Management. SONY has infected that CD so that it will alter the way Windows works so that you can't put that CD onto your iPod or make a copy to use in your car player that eats CD's occasionally.

      That might finally get through.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    8. Re:Hope it catches on by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      I would also put all computer games distributed with intrusive copy protection that for example:

      - has it's own a device driver for low level cdrom access
      - has active measures preventing CDROM drive simulators (daemon tools) from working.

      It is unfortunate that buying customers have to suffer from misfeatures that a well cracked illegal copy simply doesn't have.

      (and I totally hate swapping CDs)

      The next games I am thinking of buying after Q4 is Civ4, X3 and maybe Serious Sam 2 (demo 1 totally sucked, I hear the game is actually much better), but it won't happen if they have this kind of copy protection.

    9. Re:Hope it catches on by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Civ4 does have it, but to get round it you can use Daemon Tools and a little utility called SafeDisk4 Hider (as it uses the latest version that Daemon Tools doesn't support yet). Or at least, so I've heard...

      The game itself is well worth the hassle though.

    10. Re:Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best way to spread it? Google bomb?

    11. Re:Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, I would have to agree.
      Sometimes, you would have to scare some computer users to make them aware of certain problems.
      I learnt this useful technique from George Walker Bush (although he played that in political field instead)

    12. Re:Hope it catches on by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Lets make sure to Googlebomb the hell out of it. Remember:

      Infected with DRM

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    13. Re:Hope it catches on by MilenCent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmm... maybe we should get stickers made and pay a little visit to the local Walmart....

    14. Re:Hope it catches on by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

      "Have you bought and played any music CDs lately?" ... There are standards for what constitutes a "CD" (I am not familiar with the technical definition - and I imagine an audio CD, in particular... I am thinking of any formal definition that Phillips (?) might have done years ago...

      As soon as there is software on the CD, does it fit this formal definition, or must / should it actually be called something else? If the "CD" is not clearly labeled (that it's a variant of the audio CD definition), is this a fundamental misrepresentation?

      Anyway, it's a thought...

    15. Re:Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For god's sake, yes. ./ we are all now responsible for spreading a new term "infected with DRM." A bad publicity spin is a better way to combat DRM than actaully explaing it to Joe Sixpack. The word infected implies that it's bad, christ I've met people who think viruses are like human viruses (no one makes them they just happen). Leave the tech speak at home, just dumb it down to three words: infected with DRM.

      Excellent idea. The other half is when they ask what "DRM" is, simply call it "Digital Restriction Management." Everyone likes rights, no one likes restrictions.

    16. Re:Hope it catches on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean iNfected with DRM.

    17. Re:Hope it catches on by gsyswerda · · Score: 1
      infected with DRM

      Great phrase. Packs the same punch as "Christian Taliban" to refer to the extreme right.

      --
      Make a difference: move to a swing state.
    18. Re:Hope it catches on by gerf · · Score: 1

      To many people, silvery discs are "CDs". They don't care about technical details. Hell, my parents call "DVDs" "CDs."

    19. Re:Hope it catches on by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      For god's sake, yes. ./ we are all now responsible for spreading a new term "infected with DRM."

      Just FYI, I think you may have started something... check out this Inquirer story.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  5. Russinovich's Take by sp1nl0ck · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mark Russinovich's blog has a lot of detail about this particular package, including some info on how to get rid of it...

    --
    War is God's way of teaching Americans geography
    1. Re:Russinovich's Take by jurt1235 · · Score: 2, Informative

      how to get rid of it...

      Except that he put a link to a form, and not to a way to get rid of it. Looking further into the sony website the code used seems to originate from http://www.xcp-aurora.com/ . Maybe that is the root of all problems.
      Sue Sony -> Sony sue Aurora -> Lawyers will get rich and happy.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    2. Re:Russinovich's Take by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Hey, lawyers have gotta make an extravigant living too.

    3. Re:Russinovich's Take by calbanese · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or maybe they get their money because they know how to spell.

    4. Re:Russinovich's Take by interiot · · Score: 5, Funny
      Hahaha.
      1. complain to editors about posting dupes
      2. editors start to link to their previous stories
      3. posters visit those previous stories, and copy links FROM THE previous FREAKING ARTICLE itself
      4. ???
      5. profit!!
      How does this stuff get modded up?
    5. Re:Russinovich's Take by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Whoops, sorry for misspelling extravagant. Boy, that one slipped right past me. A lot of jokes do that to. You know what I mean? Sometimes there's this joke, and I just don't seem to get it.

    6. Re:Russinovich's Take by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Informative

      Easy. Slashdot punishes you for moderating stuff down, and moderators know this, so pretty much everything that's even remotely interesting gets modded up.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    7. Re:Russinovich's Take by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      Yes, like somebody telling a joke, and then discovering that they forgot the clue.
      Some people must have lots of "You spelled this wrong" messages in their list.
      Just give it up. My spelling will not get better from my posts on /., certainly not by random comments on it.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    8. Re:Russinovich's Take by m50d · · Score: 1

      The correct thing to do at 2. is stop posting the fricking dupes, not just link to them. Or fix the moderation system at 4., but what're the odds of that happening?

      --
      I am trolling
    9. Re:Russinovich's Take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How does this stuff get modded up?

      I bet the to-much-to-believe dept has something to do with it.

  6. Hrm... by LilGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    So they're gonna root all my cds? Yet another reason to switch to KaZaa/Grokster/Mule/DC++

    *sigh* Silly executives, rape is for kids.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
    1. Re:Hrm... by NtroP · · Score: 1
      So they're gonna root all my cds?
      You do realize that this only affects people who use Windows. The CDs work find in OS X and Linux.

      Maybe if more people used alternative OS's, DRM couldn't get as much of a footing as it is. If you know that your efforts are only going to affect (infect?) half the people out there (instead of 90%), it raises the bar for this kind of crap.

      So instead of using this as an excuse to go out and violate copyrights, use it as another reason to switch to an alternative OS that still allows you to exercise your fair use rights. There are an awful lot of people on Slashdot who claim to be pro-open source, pro-Linux, anti-monopoly, etc., who obviously still have their lips firmly grafted to Bill's ass.

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    2. Re:Hrm... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      True true. That would be a better way to look at the situation. But then again, how many NON-NERDS are going to jump on the linux bandwagon just to circumvent some DRM technology?

      I realize it sounded rather ignorant to immediately raise up Kazaa and the p2p networks as a solution, but that is exactly what most of the population will do when they run into trouble with their cds.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    3. Re:Hrm... by NtroP · · Score: 1
      ...how many NON-NERDS are going to jump on the linux bandwagon just to circumvent some DRM ...
      :-)

      You have a point there. When I heard about this the first time, I fired off a note to Sony (and the band) telling them that I would NOT buy their CD. I said that I organize and play all my music through iTunes (streamed to my Stereo with my Airport Express) and that if they were going to pull stunts like this I'd make sure I never bought a Sony CD again. I also said that I'd buy the tracks I liked off ITMS instead.

      I use OS X at home and Linux at work so their rootkit doesn't affect me, but I would never support a company that uses tactics like this. I know that buying the music off ITMS still supports Sony indirectly, but the fact that they chose this method of DRM specifically to keep me from using their music in iTunes, made me mad, so I thought I'd buy the tracks, just to tweak them (rather than P2P'ing them which would not support the band).

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    4. Re:Hrm... by fatcatman · · Score: 1

      Silly executives, rape is for kids.

      Err, am I the only one who finds this statement very disturbing?

    5. Re:Hrm... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Now that I look at it, yes I find it very disturbing. I can't for the life of me remember what point I was taking a jab at with that statement, but I know I had one at the time...

      I gotta stop smokin weed and drinking 3 cups of coffee before work in the mornings.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
  7. Never fear, Slashdot is here! by NerdBuster · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It's nice to see this story not getting lost in the cracks since the implications are gigantic."

    With Slashdot reporting this 10 times a day I doubt it will get lost :)

    1. Re:Never fear, Slashdot is here! by Lothsahn · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Of all the "dupes" that Slashdot can post, I'm personally glad for this one (it's not really a dupe as it provides extra information).

      We're losing our rights, and the more media attention that BS like this gets, the better.

      --
      -=Lothsahn=-
    2. Re:Never fear, Slashdot is here! by harrkev · · Score: 2, Insightful
      With Slashdot reporting this 10 times a day I doubt it will get lost :)
      This story on /. is preaching to the choir. We all know about this. What IS newsworthy is that this is starting to hit mainstream press (well, at least getting closer to mainstream). If this makes it to Newsweek, it will give Sony a big black eye.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    3. Re:Never fear, Slashdot is here! by VENONA · · Score: 1

      Techworld picked it up today (November 02, 05): http://www.techworld.com/storage/features/index.cf m?featureid=1931

      It's on the lead page of Google News: http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8 &q= with links to the Washington Post article, and a C Net article, etc. Also a link to 47 more articles: http://news.google.com/nwshp?hl=en&tab=wn&ie=UTF-8 &ncl=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Spyware/index.php%3Fp% 3D690

      So the news is on at least four continents, and in at least some mainstream press. Serves Sony right, and I hope this gives them a major black eye.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  8. Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by snotclot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok sure, so boycotting Sony is not realistic. Or is it...? We can really do without them. Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD and CompactFlash. Screw their VAIO's, we have Dell and Taiwanese laptops.. Screw their TV's, we have better ones from other brands. Screw PS3, we have XBOX2 and Nintendo Revolution. Screw PSP, we have Nintendo DS. Once they get the collective shaft, well, other companies will think twice before pulling shit like this.

    1. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      i dont think anyone considers memorysticks to be anything but a useless dead format....

    2. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      XBOX2 is just as DRM'ed as the PS3, probably ditto for the revolution.

    3. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but those are all unincorporated arms that ahve nothing to do with the music making arm.

      I'd just rather not buy Sony CDs and let them get bad press for fucking up people's computers.

      OH wait, I already don't.

      and they're already getting bad press. *yawn*

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    4. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Donniedarkness · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Honestly, I wish we COULD start a mass boycot against Sony... not even for this, really, but more because of the RIAA. The problem is, most people don't think that it's worth not having the latest crap music, if that's what it takes to send these guys a message :(

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    5. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What really sucks though, is boycotting a company you don't buy anything from anyway. Honestly I haven't purchased shit of theirs since my last pair of headphones. I'm not really brand conscious though, more of an impulse buyer. I suppose they somewhat rely on the impulse buyer as well, so maybe I'll make a dent if I keep their underhanded tactics in mind before I make it to the register with anything with their logo on it in hand.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    6. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to list Blu-Ray. Sony has more pattens on Blu-Ray than anyone else.

    7. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by God'sDuck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      i dont think anyone considers memorysticks to be anything but a useless dead format....


      there's nothing wrong with memory sticks! sure they're proprietary - but sony's consumer-grade cameras are currently the best on the market,* simply because their AF system has made several advances in the past three years which make their cameras solidly faster in-use than the competition. canon's following closely; hopefully the situation will reverse in the next year or so (the market was even 3 years ago, such leads rarely last).....but all to say, memory stick, while a dead end, perhaps, is certainly not dead, as most of the best and most popular cameras still demand it. furthermore, with moore's law, EVERY format you buy is dead in two years. my first digicam (kodak) was given a 64 meg card (compact flash), my second (sony - memory stick) a 128, then later a 256, my third (canon - compact flash) a 512, and my fourth (canon) 1 gig. i anticipate a 4 gig card for my next camera.

      all to say - people that waste time whining about proprietary memory that-they-can't-take-with-them need to realize that they can't take it with them *anyway*, at least until the megapixel war subsides. storage for serious photographers is more analogous to RAM than floppies - it's just part of the camera system. even if the format is compliant with subsequent models, they'll likely consider it prohibitively small, and they're better off selling it off to pay for half a new one.


      ps: and before you say "b4t m1n3z d4 b0mbz!" realize i'm not dissing your camera, i'm just saying that, at this point in time, when you take a consumer down the line in a camera store that carries all brands of cameras, and make them play with each camera uninfluenced by sales rhetoric or concerns for proprietary formats or brand preference, a significant majority gravitate to the Sony's...not all, but most (like 5/6, among people that consult with me). doesn't mean the others aren't good, or don't have specific features that make them more desireable to other people, just means their user interface and general operation speed is slightly less eye-catching. natch?

      pps: OT? sorry. just a pet peeve of mine. you can say it's proprietary and we should resist proprietary formats on principle, but don't mix "proprietary" with "technically bad," or underestimate Sony's ability to keep its CompactBetamax in very active use for years to come.
    8. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      "Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks"

      Proprietary != DRM.

      They make very nice cameras, so I don't have any issues in using their media cards. It'd be nice if they were more universal and therefor cheaper, but anyone who believes that they're OMGSOHORRIBLE doesn't have a need for them.

    9. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      I prefer compact flash *shrugs*

    10. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by laughing_badger · · Score: 1
      Sure it's realistic.

      Anytime I hear that a friend or someone at work is considering a Sony purchase, I go out of my way to find a better offer from any other company. I've done them out of a laptop already this week.

      My reason is more to do with Sony shafting Alderac over the Stargate RPG license, but yes boycott them in any way you can.

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
    11. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by interiot · · Score: 1

      Or, what's even more important, encourage the story to be in the media, so more people read about it. THAT is what gets companies to stop doing things. This story is already getting quite a bit of press, but call your local newspaper and ask them if they might run a story on it.

    12. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      We're the minority. Sony can laugh at us all day and we can't touch them as long as they still have their idiot brainwashing (people believe Sony is high quality). The only way we can do anything is pass this news around "Sony CDs screw up your PC! It like kills it and shit!". It may not be totally true but it's not far off and Sony will come out really bad if it makes it to the public mind share.

      --
      I like muppets.
    13. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      me too. quite a bit. but my camera system weighs 20+ pounds...my friends who use small devices, on the other hand, swear by MS/MSDuo. just saying...it aint goin' anywhere, even if we geeks dislike it.

    14. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To add to that a bit...

      You can't even complain about the cost of memory sticks anymore. Last time I checked at Bestbuy they were very similarly priced to the MMC /SD and xD cards. Frankly I can't see any reasons left to complain... the rest of the market has been fragmented by SD / Mini SD, MMC, xD, Compact flash... so it doesn't really matter what format you buy, chances are if you change cameras you will have to buy a new stick. At least Sony is using memory sticks for user data storage on all of their new gaming systems now...

    15. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Kobun · · Score: 1
      Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD and CompactFlash.


      Well, you have compactflash anyways.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPPM
    16. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      sony's consumer-grade cameras are currently the best on the market,* simply because their AF system has made several advances in the past three years which make their cameras solidly faster in-use than the competition.

      Umm,, faster AF is not the first thing that comes to mind, when considering buying a consumer grade camera, Simply because 99% pics taken from a consumer camera are posed shots where the photographer and the camera both have plenty of time to compose , focus and shoot.

      You certainly can't take a consumer camera to an NBA/NHL/NFL game and expect to get great shots.

      If I am buying a consumer grade camera , my priorities will be..

      • How good are the pictures , straight off the camera ? I am not going to buy a 200$ camera and then go and spend 1000$ on photoshop ,, just to get my snapshots have right whitebalance, sharping, saturation etc.
      • How fast is the start up time, coz I expect to start and shut the camera often
      • How much is the shutter lag, much important for me than AF speed. I don't want to click now and have the shutter go off after 2 secs , just to realise that my subject has moved.
      • Does it have a movie mode, it's nice to record small clips now and then
      • How small is it. I would like to carry it in my shirt pocket
      • How easy is it to get the pictures from the camera to my PC. i.e. what is the quality of the s/w bundled with it
      And sony certainly does not lead canon, nikon, olympus in these departments. It might be a neck to neck compition, but to proclaim that sony makes best consumer grade cameras is quite a bold statement.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    17. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not clear that a boycott is even possible. With a company as large as Sony, it's increasingly difficult to avoid their products. Rebrands, 'wholly owned subsidiaries', even majority stakes in other companies... how are you going to keep them from taking your money?

      After a company gets sufficiently large, well, they've got their fingers in too many pies to count.

    18. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      Care to reference?

      The XBox 360 will, yes, probably have as much DRM as the PS3, which is to say, you won't be able to import the games and the disks will be dang hard to read in anything else. However, based on the Sony's willingness to release a root kit on a CD, I do not feel confident that the PS3 won't (for example) report back every game, DVD, CD, etc. I play to Sony, incase they're copied.

      More importantly, even if the XBox 360 and PS3 have exactly as much DRM, the key point is to get it into Sony's thick (apparently, incredibly thick) skull that if they sell products with rootkits (or which in any other way are likely to be harmful to my systems), I'm going to avoid them and everything they sell like the plague.

    19. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem with simply boycotting (on a small scale, as I assume most non-geeks don't care) is that companies won't understand why sales for product X or for their company as a whole are down and it is human nature to look everywhere but within.

      Look at the RIAA/MPAA and their correlation of sales/piracy. They'll never link sales could be down because the current music sucks or whatever - it's always the market's fault somehow - piracy, recession, depression, etcetera.

      So next time you are tempted to buy a Sony product and instead decide to boycott it, write them a nice (I mean it) letter (not email) to their headquarters, preferable to a manager (find it on their site):

      http://www.sony.com/SCA/senior_mgmnt.shtml (sorry, this is the best I can find, you'll have to go from there)

      Explaining why you didn't buy their product. Specifically link it with their DRM practices. Include a copy of the reciept for the product you did buy - this way the impact on the bottom line is tangible and credible.

      A small boycott without communication your frustration is nearly worthless.

    20. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>(people believe Sony is high quality).

      My father's sony TV died last week. He only had it for 5 years and he refused to believe it was dead. Only until I plugged in into 3 other outlets to show him that it was, in fact, dead, did he believe me.

      His argument went something like this.

      "I just got this thing. TVs dont die so quickly!"
      "They do if you buy crappy hardware"
      "Its a SONY!"
      "Exactly my point. Sony makes crappy hardware"
      "No they dont."
      "Hows your tv, Dad?"
      "..."

    21. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I agree. I always had the feeling that boycotts weren't all that effective, but I never thought of taking the time to explain why I am boycotting a company's products. You made a very good point, and I intend to follow thru with the advice.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    22. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by ooze · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you will rather buy an Xbox than a PS3? Because Sony tries to get control of your computer with a rootkit?

      Think again, who has more power over your Windows computer, Sony or Microsoft? Who doesn't even need to install a root kit to do anything on it they want to?

      --
      Just because I can imagine doing a hippopotamus, doesn't mean I'd like to do it.
    23. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      I haven't posted on Slashdot in a while, but this is somewhat important. I couldn't agree more with the parent poster. I have therefore written the following email to all my immediate family and friends, declare my intent to boycott all Sony products.

      My Email is as follow:
      "
      Enough is enough.

      Sony BMG (Music studio) just put a "Rootkit" into some of their music CD's

      Here: (http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2005/ 11/sony_raids_hack.html)
      Here: (http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/79450/sony-drm-burrow s-into-rootkit-code.html)

      Of course none of the traditional news outlets are covering this story.

      A rootkit, is a program which is very difficult to detect (most anti-virus software will miss it), because it essentially hides itself from the rest of your computer's systems. It is a program which is traditionally used by evil hackers to gain control of your computer and either prevents it from working properly or spies on you.

      In Sony's asinine attempt to "prevent" music piracy, they have decided that they have the right to take over your computer in the process and monitor your every action.

      Fortunately, they depend on consumers to fund their evil business model. So from this point on, I will not buy, purchase, or recommend another Sony product for as long as this continues. We as consumers do NOT owe Sony anything. They do not have the right to monitor our every electronic action.
      "

      --
      Sig it.
    24. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah! I'm sick of Sony with their underhanded business tactics and their lack of support for open formats! So screw the PS3, I'm going to buy an Xbox2 instead! Nope, no big, evil corporations are getting my money that way...

    25. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      * How good are the pictures , straight off the camera ? I am not going to buy a 200$ camera and then go and spend 1000$ on photoshop ,, just to get my snapshots have right whitebalance, sharping, saturation etc. * How fast is the start up time, coz I expect to start and shut the camera often * How much is the shutter lag, much important for me than AF speed. I don't want to click now and have the shutter go off after 2 secs , just to realise that my subject has moved. * Does it have a movie mode, it's nice to record small clips now and then * How small is it. I would like to carry it in my shirt pocket * How easy is it to get the pictures from the camera to my PC. i.e. what is the quality of the s/w bundled with it

      just for you to justify my statement, then:
      *photo quality: most manufacturers are neck-and-neck; variation is stronger from model-to-model than brand-to-brand.
      *start-up time: sony is the pack leader in certain model lines (W), but all the top manufacturers are now neck and neck
      *what you call shutter lag is determined by AF speed; all good manufacturers now (since ~3 years ago) have their shutter lag after AF measured in small numbers of milliseconds.
      *movie mode: virtually all digicams now have very good movie modes.
      *size: all major manufacturers tied
      *s/w bundles: software bundles tend to be stinky, and many people prefer just to use finder/explorer (most cameras mount as drives for drag/drop) or iPhoto (*shudder*).

      with all else being equal, you can perhaps see why i put such weight on AF at the moment - because there's such a difference in the 2005 models, and it's one of the most noticeable differences to consumers. that said - i regularly recommend canon, fuji, panasonic, etc to specific people who have specific needs; but for those who "just want a camera for their mother," i really do think sony had the best model line this year.

    26. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or start calling them "Sony/RIAA".

    27. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok sure, so boycotting Sony is not realistic. Or is it...? We can really do without them. Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD and CompactFlash. Screw their VAIO's, we have Dell and Taiwanese laptops.. Screw their TV's, we have better ones from other brands. Screw PS3, we have XBOX2 and Nintendo Revolution. Screw PSP, we have Nintendo DS. Once they get the collective shaft, well, other companies will think twice before pulling shit like this.

      We have our SD? SD is the "Secure Digital" version of MMC. "Secure" as in DRM, dumbass.

      Further, only Sony "MagicGate" Memory Sticks have DRM on them.

    28. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by AgentGibbled · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for consumers, the record companies basically get to give it to us both ways here. They get to DRM the crap out of everything because the DMCA, etc. say they can. If anyone complains about it, they get to call them Thieves(tm). If people boycott their products, they get to point at the declining sales and say "Look! The impact of P2P is getting WORSE! We need more laws to protect us!" and while they're at it sue every twelve-year-old they can get their hands on for millions of dollars. While I agree that Sony has clearly crossed the line here, I'd bet that boycotting them stands about as much chance of making the situation worse as it does of making it better.

    29. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Funny
      Screw their stupid DRM'ed Memorysticks, we have our SD...

      SD is an abbreviation for Secure Digital. The remaining irony is left as an excercise to the reader.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    30. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Arcys · · Score: 1

      Rebrands often have less value then their major brands. If you can find out the major brands you can destroy the years of work and millions of dollars they put into building them into household names.

    31. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      After buying a Sony Receiver that needs to be rebooted occasioanlly, and a Sony DVD player that (like 50% of other owners reported) died right outside of the warantee because they attached a heatsink with double-sided sticky tape, I already refused to buy Sony products ever again. I called Sony on both problems and they denied ever hearing about them before, refused to let me send links to hundreds/thousands of users having the exact same problems, and wanted me to pay them $180 just to LOOK at the DVD player, plus parts plus labor, when I could buy a new one for $50.

      Sony is dead. Their only product with any quality left - their Trinitron CRT - is going the way of the dinosaurs.

    32. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Lurk3r · · Score: 1

      It starts with the rejection of Blu Ray

    33. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by EvlD99 · · Score: 1

      "Think again, who has more power over your Windows computer, Sony or Microsoft? Who doesn't even need to install a root kit to do anything on it they want to?" Ummm... This statement is like saying "Who has more power over your Sony Playstatin". It doesn't have a point. However Microsoft does have to make you sign an agreeement any time they want to modify your operating system. If you don't want to have it modified you can simply not update it and it is still perfectly usable. They don't require you to use DRM protected content. It is a choice that you can make yourself. DRM aside Sony's propriety formats and connections are a pain. It will be nice being able to plug my iPod mini into my Xbox 360 standard USB 2.0 port and have it work. P.S. Hopefully Sony will not kill Blue-Ray with DRM protection.

    34. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Revolution it is, then.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    35. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Except that the "secure" part, while functional, hasn't really caught on at all.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    36. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      To not update it, you pretty much have to leave it off the net.

      The update service, if it is running, does do some updates even if you have automatic updates turned off. I haven't looked to see if it still happens with the update service off.

    37. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by EvlD99 · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links or info to verify that it actually updates the computer an not just checks for them?

    38. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      We're the minority.

      Acually, we're not quite as much of a minority as you might think. THink about it. How many times over the past couple of years has someone asked for your recommendation of what computer to buy? Same goes when people are thinking of upgrading their CDROM or other similar hardware. If it's "tech" many people don't feel comfortable enough about making mkajor purchases without at least consulting with their resident Geek.

      You don't have to tell them why they shouldn't by the Sony product. Just recommend something else and if asked, about a Sony PC, just say something about hardware compatability issues. Geeks can have a bigger effect on such things than their raw numbers might indicate.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    39. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by Froobly · · Score: 1

      So next time you are tempted to buy a Sony product and instead decide to boycott it, write them a nice (I mean it) letter (not email) to their headquarters, preferable to a manager (find it on their site):

      The only problem with this is that I, and probably many other slashdot users, can't start writing about this stuff without getting angry, and once you get yourself good and angry, it's hard to write something that doesn't sound somewhat abusive.

      Or maybe you overcompensate and say something like, "Oh, you are such great people who make such wonderful products. I really wish you would stop bundling software with your music CDs, but I guess it's only a minor gripe, right? Sorry I didn't buy your CD today. Maybe next time! Keep up the good work!" which of course completely undermines the point.

    40. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      And screw their music CDs, because they don't carry They Might Be Giants!

      Umph!

    41. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Don't some of the memory sticks (the MagicGate ones) contain hardware support for DRM?

    42. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      (people believe Sony is high quality)

      This is changing. I've heard quite a bit more about Sony audio-visual components breaking recently than customer satisfaction. All those people with PS2 CD problems can't be helping them, either.

    43. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      Check the event log. The Crypto subsystem is updated, even with updates turned off.

      I don't know if anything else is. From looking at my current event log, it says registering new root certs and sequence numbers, at the very least. It's the crypt32 events under the Application event log.

      Successful auto update retrieval of third-party root list cab from: http://www.download.windowsupdate.com/msdownload/u pdate/v3/static/trustedr/en/authrootstl.cab>

    44. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see that you are correct. Newer memory sticks include magicgate support to better compete with SD memory. I haven't been in the market for those sticks in a while.

    45. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by EvlD99 · · Score: 1

      I checked my application even log back to 9/26 (where it ends) and I don't have that event at all. Infact the only microsoft one I have is for office 2003. I have my auto updates set to notify me when available btw. That may have something to do with one of your Microsoft applications such as windows media player. If that is the case just disable the auto update option.

    46. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by JimmehAH · · Score: 1

      In this case it's both.

      MagicGate

    47. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by snotclot · · Score: 1

      That's an excellent point. Hopefully Slashdot, the Inq, etc will be enough to get on CNN's frontpage... if CNN isn't somehow owned by Sony in some way already! Mod this man up!

    48. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by argent · · Score: 1

      What really sucks though, is boycotting a company you don't buy anything from anyway.

      let's see, I have a Sony PDA, two Sony TVs, two Sony VCRs, a Sony DVD player, a Sony CD changer, and several pairs of Sony headphones.

      The last ones are going to hurt the most, because I haven't found another company that makes lightweight headphones that don't physically hurt to wear... and I seem to be hard on headphones.

    49. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by snotclot · · Score: 1

      Great! I hope that your forward is successful and I'll know that if it eventually reaches me :)

    50. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      what you call shutter lag is determined by AF speed; all good manufacturers now (since ~3 years ago) have their shutter lag after AF measured in small numbers of milliseconds

      That is not fully correct, shutter lag and AF speed have nothing to do with each other. AF speed is time it takes for the camera to focus on the subject.

      Shutter lag is time it takes for the camera to save the picture once the shutter release button is fully pressed.

      Shutter lag comes in to picture after the button is fully pressed, the camera has already auto focused by then, when you half press the shutter release button.

      Shutter lag is determined by write speeds of the memory card, in which case sony offers not much advantage over others.

      AF speed will affect shutter lag only if you were to press the shutter release button all the way down, (i.e. no half press to lock focus). But if you are shooting snapshots /landscapes , posed shots, there is no reason for you to not half press the button, get a proper focus and then fully press it down, thus removing the AF speed from the shutter lag equation.

      And even you can agree memory stick is not the fastest memory out there.

      But I concur with all your other points,

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    51. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      ah! i see our confusion - i misinterpreted what you were saying. you're right in it not being AF, but i'm familiar with the convention that defines the "time it takes for the camera to save the picture" as shot-to-shot time; shutter lag usually refers to the time between AF lock and shutter swing; before the write cycle. as for card speed - MSpro, CF etc - they're all currently rated at or beyond the write speed of the cameras - my fastest CF card (sandisk extreme III) is ~133x, but my camera is somewhere between 60x and 80x. so the buffer size is starting to be more a factor than write speed when bursting multiple images...that and flash recycle...and sony is barely average in that department. you're prolly not their target audience. :-)

    52. Re:Simple Solution: Boycott Sony to Death by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      I don't use media player. It looks like it updated every two weeks or so, no indication of what triggered the update, just the "crypt32" designation for the application.

  9. Let us hope: by Winckle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That this sets a precedent, and that Sony don't wriggle out of this, at the very best it could point out some of the absurdities of the DMCA.

    1. Re:Let us hope: by n0dalus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately Sony may be able to claim that they offer an uninstaller.

      From TFA:
      Hypponen said the only way to uninstall the program in the conventional sense (without running the risk of hosing your system or CD-ROM drive) is to contact Sony BMG directly via a Web form and request removal.

      At that point, a real, live person will call you back and ask for all kinds of information about your system, and your reason for wanting to remove the software. You're then directed to a Web page that downloads an ActiveX program (yes, you must be using Microsoft's Internet Explorer to do this), which determines what version is installed and reports that back to First4Internet. Then you get an e-mail containing a link to another site that downloads something that finally uninstalls the Sony program.


      So, although they make you sell your firstborn to get it, they apparently do offer an uninstaller. IANAL, but maybe someone can still argue that the uninstaller needs to be bundled with the CD. Sony might also be liable if the installation damages your computer.

    2. Re:Let us hope: by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      I suppose one question I would have to ask is:

      Is anyone trying to do anything to make sure they DON'T wriggle their way out of this?

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:Let us hope: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is important that the poor sap who jumped through these hoops put the uninstaller on a p2p network! seriously!

    4. Re:Let us hope: by itsme1234 · · Score: 1

      What if I don't have Internet in the first place ? I boght the damn CD just so I don't have to play with shady software; if I'm willing to do that I can just take it from the p2p of the day.

      And after all I want to remove the damn crapware because I don't trust Sony in the first place. Now they want to run MORE crap AND to have my computer connected to their servers.

      What they should do is to pick up the bill I'll have from cleaning up (or reinstall) my system by somebody *I* trust.

    5. Re:Let us hope: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to see what they'd tell you to do if you told them you'd installed their software on a computer not allowed to be on the internet (e.g. your business machine with accounting information on it).

  10. Re:DUPE? by kyouteki · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not a dupe, an update. Surely additional viewpoints on an issue as large as this warrants additional coverage.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  11. The Solution is Simple Folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just never buy a cd again.

    Me, I think I'll just pirate all my music from now on. That way I don't have to worry about any of this DRM nonsense!

    1. Re:The Solution is Simple Folks! by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      You're right. I want to buy CD's, specifically I recently wanted to buy the latest Foo Fighters CD, In Your Honor. But I noticed that it was Copy Protected. The amazon reviews talked about this in detail. I decided I simply wouldnt buy a "CD" if it wasnt guarenteed to even play in my car CD player much less be able to rip to my MP3 player and install who knows what on my PC.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    2. Re:The Solution is Simple Folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. No no no.

      All that does is legitimize their desire to use even stronger DRM. "Look! We only sold 50,000 copies, but it was pirated 10,000,000 times!" They can't blame it on piracy if nobody is pirating their music. In which case maybe -- just maybe -- they might realize they need to work on their business model.

  12. First4Internet by WarwickRyan · · Score: 5, Informative

    The malware installed is created by a company called First4Internet.

    They're based in Banbury, Oxford and their CEO is Mathew Gilliant-Smith DBC.

    6 South Bar Street
    Banbury
    Oxfordshire
    OX16 9AA
    United Kingdom

    All info (and more) available on their website here http://www.first4internet.com/contact.aspx/

    That's about 20 minutes in the car for me, should I go pay them a visit - taking the best wishes of the /. community with me? ;)

    1. Re:First4Internet by TrueKonrads · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suggest you put blank keys together with some epoxytde in their locks, break of the keys and slap DRM sticker :)

      --
      Lone Gunmen crew.
    2. Re:First4Internet by God'sDuck · · Score: 4, Funny

      that would actually be Analog Rights Management.

      lovely idea, though.

    3. Re:First4Internet by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Please do. May I request you put it on a brick and give Jack Thompson a reason to believe he's right? :D

      Video games don't make people violent,polite reqeusts in discussions do!

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:First4Internet by interiot · · Score: 1

      They can create rootkits all they want. If the Sonys and Universals and EMIs of the world get a clear message through the press that rootkits scare customers off, then Sony/Universal/EMI won't ever buy stuff from First4Internet, or they'll force First4Internet to remove the rootkit.

    5. Re:First4Internet by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Sure!

      I specially recommend that you use one of the many little tricks here.

      Specially
      any
      one of
      these. ;-) ;-) *sob* *sob* *wink*

      HTH.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:First4Internet by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more along the lines of taking an old box with said malware installed, a invoice for my time (@ my standard $200/hour) and a videocamera.

    7. Re:First4Internet by xtracto · · Score: 1
      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    8. Re:First4Internet by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Wow, the bastards responsible for this technology are talking about putting RFID directly into the CD/DVD:

      [url:http://www.it-enquirer.com/main/ite/more/digi tal_rights_management/>

    9. Re:First4Internet by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I perfer my idea but sure, or you could take in an old box and drop it on the front desk and go "Excuse me, you've installed a virus on my PC via a Sony CD. Will you be removing it or should I charge by the hour at £X00(add as many 0s as you likee, but 2 sounds about right) for having to remove it via a repair guy (don't say you, it seems supicious).

      Demand compensation (for petrol to get there), the money to fix it and if they refuse tell them you'll take them to court for the damages (claim the box was used for something important like hosting websites and the rootkit has not passed some safety tests that all servers must pass at your company).

      Aww the fun of being a sick little geek :D

      --
      I like muppets.
    10. Re:First4Internet by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 4, Funny
      No no, it's Door Rights Management.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    11. Re:First4Internet by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      Mathew Gilliant-Smith DBC

      What the f's a "DBC"???

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    12. Re:First4Internet by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      that would actually be Analog Rights Management.

      I realize this is a joke, but if you think about it, a tumbler lock is most certainly a digital device, if not an electronic one.

    13. Re:First4Internet by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Double Barrelled C**t.

      It refers to a practise carried out mainly in Middle England (tm) to make it appear that the owner has a greater social standing than they actually do.

      Parody'd to death in Keeping Up Apperances ahref=http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/k /keepingupappeara_7773960.shtml/rel=url2html-9998h ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/k/keepin gupappeara_7773960.shtml/>

    14. Re:First4Internet by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      And along with our "best wishes", a cricket bat.

      IBM

  13. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by klubar · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's software like Sony's that makes windows unstable. A clean install of Windows with only "certfied for windows XP" software is rock solid. It's once you start added badly written drivers and other code the mucks into the OS that it becomes unstable. As the systeminternals article indicated, the driver doesn't follow the rules for unloading itself and other violations that can lead to the blue screen of death. Perhaps MS should increase the level of warnings about non-certified code, but users would still click-thru and blame the OS when it crashes.

    It's not a Windows-specific problem, it's just that Sony has only implemented it for windows.

  14. Contains LAME code? by Sulka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting.. Some reports Finnish reader of this news in Sektori.com (in Finnish) reports Contents\GO.EXE file seems to contain parts of the LAME player. Can anyone verify this? Is Sony distributing LGPL software on the CDs?

    --
    "Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid, it is true that most stupid people are conservative."
    1. Re:Contains LAME code? by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh, I hope it's so. The delicious, tasty, non-fattening irony. Using an embedded copyright violation to enforce copyrights. I shudder in ecstacy at the thought.

      Who'll follow up on this thread? I'm sure we can find enough free-as-in-freedom warriors to do a tech analysis on the software and confirm the report in parent comment? C'mon, hoisting retards on their own petards is just too much fun!

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Contains LAME code? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      LAME player?

      I don't think LAME has their own decoder. It's an encoder, and GPL I think..

    3. Re:Contains LAME code? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, LAME does include a decoder. I use it to decode my MP3s when making audio CDs for my car. MP3s, which, just for the record, I have encoded from CDs which I own.

      Offtopic: Ya know, I don't have an actual CD player suitable for playing the CDs I buy. I absolutely cannot keep the original discs in my car, as they only last a few months getting shuffled around. Hell, they take a beating just being in my car, in a CD carrying case. Other than while driving, I listen to music while working, in several different locations, on my laptop.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    4. Re:Contains LAME code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If Sony are violating the LGPL, by including code on the CD without following the licence, then the licence terminates and Sony can be held for copyright infringement. From the LGPL:
      8. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, link with, or distribute the Library except as expressly provided under this License. Any attempt otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense, link with, or distribute the Library is void, and will automatically terminate your rights under this License. However, parties who have received copies, or rights, from you under this License will not have their licenses terminated so long as such parties remain in full compliance.
      I'm not sure if this means Sony could be prevented from distributing other LGPL or GPLed software, for example selling Linux built in with the PS3, but this does mean they can be sued and have an injunction taken against them to stop the CDs from being sold.
    5. Re:Contains LAME code? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      They've committed copyright infringement on a fairly large scale if this is true (and they havn't, say, paid the LAME people for a non-LGPL licensed version). It doesn't affect their ability to bundle Linux with the PS3, unless they violate the license there as well, but they can be sued and whatnot by the LAME folks.

    6. Re:Contains LAME code? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Having all of your CDs stolen from your CD binder that you left in your car is another fine reason to keep only copies in the vehicle.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    7. Re:Contains LAME code? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Having all of your CDs stolen from your CD binder that you left in your car is another fine reason to keep only copies in the vehicle.

      Damn PIRATE! PIRATE PIRATE PIRATE!
      That is distributing unauthorized copies, copyright infringment.

      You have to keep the original CDs in the binder in your car, and if they are stolen from you then you need to buy new copies. Otherwise you are a theif.

      P I R A T E !

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Contains LAME code? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      LOL. I also have a friend that backs up his Disney DVDs so that when his daughter uses them as "ice skates" on the living room carpet, he can just burn her another copy. He AND his daughter should be sued. Not only that, ice skating is NOT an authorized use!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  15. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by caddisfly · · Score: 1

    ....OK. so you will let any corporation or other entity enter your computer, house, car, body, etc to modify what is found there, without your knowledge, under the guise that *they* need to protect *their* property rights?

    Welcome to 1984 and the birth of facism is America....

    keep with the herd, please and "Baaa" only when spoken to

  16. Yes, this is bad by Sheepdot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sony could be held liable in a class-action lawsuit. Anyone can design a virus and name it "$sys$" now, and AV software won't be able to detect it if this rootkit is installed. An IM worm could use this naming scheme, only infect a few thousand people, and the news would report, "SONY's DRM software used to hide latest virus". It'd be a horrible blow, and they'd totally deserve it. I still think we'll see a virus/worm that does this before the end of this month.

    On a related note: World of Warcraft hackers are now using Sony's DRM rootkit to hide from "the Warden". I tried to submit this as a standalone story, but since I saw this DRM news update, I figured I'd post it here.

    Is Sony aiding and abetting cheaters?

    1. Re:Yes, this is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a related note: World of Warcraft hackers are now using Sony's DRM rootkit to hide from "the Warden". I tried to submit this as a standalone story, but since I saw this DRM news update, I figured I'd post it here.


      Thats it!

      Everquest is running rather slow...
      Fill in the blanks.

    2. Re:Yes, this is bad by Donniedarkness · · Score: 3, Funny
      "Is Sony aiding and abetting cheaters?"

      Doesn't Sony Entertainment develope (and produce) Everquest? Heh... I wonder what the media could do with THIS...

      "Sony using rootkit to ruin WoW"

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    3. Re:Yes, this is bad by Renraku · · Score: 4, Interesting

      People are using Sony's software to violate the ToS of World of Warcraft.

      Something that they tried to HIDE on people's computers to RESTRICT them. People are now abusing it against Blizzard. Blizzard has 'just cause' to start a lawsuit.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    4. Re:Yes, this is bad by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Blizzard has 'just cause' to start a lawsuit.
      Against Sony? No way, that's stretching the point too far. It's as daft as suing P2P software authors because people are using their software to violate copyright. Oh, wait...
    5. Re:Yes, this is bad by AnonymousBystander · · Score: 1

      Could this rootkit be used to hide softice? Some softwares are refusing to run when they found iceext in my registry, giving some $sys$ might works.

    6. Re:Yes, this is bad by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Against Sony? No way, that's stretching the point too far. It's as daft as suing P2P software authors because people are using their software to violate copyright. Oh, wait...

      P2P has legitimate uses. I can share non-copyrighted stuff. There isn't much need to hide stuff on computers legally.

    7. Re:Yes, this is bad by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely nothing illegal in someone hiding a process or a file on their own computer. The rootkit software was even obtained legally!

    8. Re:Yes, this is bad by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      In the 10th post in the thread you linked, someone is asking for an ISO image of the Sony disc so they can get infected with the DRM for free. Probably the most entertaining thing I'll read all day.

    9. Re:Yes, this is bad by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Is Sony aiding and abetting cheaters?

      No. I'm a big fan of personal responsibility and believe that everyone has a choice (even when that choice is one in which doing the right thing gets you killed). However, it seems highly appropriate that one form of DRM is being used to subvert another. It seems to me that if "The Warden" is not DRM (or doesn't incorporate it) then it is only about one small step away from being such, and definitely is objectionable on the same basis. Hmm, software subverting software? Where have I seen this before? That's right, it was spyware removing other spyware. It was only a matter of time before the companies caught on. The only difference between sociopathic scum and companies is that companies aren't as smart and don't catch on as quickly.

    10. Re:Yes, this is bad by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      My point was/is this:
      1) It's bad to hide stuff on other people's computers (trespassing in some areas)
      2) Unless you have Dissociative Identity Disorder, there is no need to hide things from yourself
      3) While this is good at hiding things from other users of your computer, it is not the only method, and not the primary method.

      All of this adds up to something that doesn't pass Betamax or Grokster muster. It has no major legitimate purpose, and it is designed for malicious intent. It would be legal if it was designed for a legal purpose and had significant legal uses. At least, that's how I understand the law, but IANAL.

    11. Re:Yes, this is bad by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      And my point is that none of that adds up to Blizzard having a case against Sony on the grounds of WoW players deliberately using Sony's rootkit to hide processes on their own computer.

    12. Re:Yes, this is bad by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      But it does add up to Sony's rootkit not being legal. Sony supplying an illegal product to people to "damage" Blizzard's credibility is implicit assistance.

    13. Re:Yes, this is bad by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      abolutely not daft at all. They have a highly stringent policy on cheating and they go to great lengths to stop it (you know, their own rootkit/Warden type thing to do the job)

      Sony's CDs are enabling people to breach this, theyre also a compeditor to Blizzard,

      Id call it illegal anticompeditive practices myself.
      How about you... (remember, it may not be deliberate, but any reason to sue over this is good id say)

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    14. Re:Yes, this is bad by PhilHibbs · · Score: 0, Redundant
      but any reason to sue over this is good id say
      I totally disagree. Blizzard have no right to sue anyone but me on the grounds of what software I choose to run on my machine. I am as outraged at that suggestion as I would be if Sony sued Bram Cohen because I had used BitTorrent to copy a Van Zant album.
  17. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the off chance that you're not a troll:

    Sony has the key to your computer.
    The key is digital, thus an infinite number of copys can be made of the key.
    The key is digital, so anyone with enough time can make a copy even if they aren't from sony.

    Once someone besides Sony has the key, they can distribute it on the internet, and now EVERYONE will have the key to your computer.

    Is it scary now? Do you think your bank plays music from sony CDs? Do you want everyone in the world having keys to your bank?

  18. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by 10Ghz · · Score: 5, Funny
    I don't understand the fuss.


    That's because you are an idiot. No, really.
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  19. Not in Europe? by Alphix · · Score: 3, Informative

    It might be interesting to note that in this newspaper article (sorry, only in Swedish), the Swedish CEO of Sony states that the copy protection is not used for CD:s sold in Europe and that "no copy protection will be introduced before it works well both for consumers and copyright owners" (which can of course be interpreted in many ways).

    1. Re:Not in Europe? by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The situation with Copy-Control CD is much worse in Sweden (and in the rest of Europe) than in the USA. Most major label CDs by scandinavian artists, as well as many international releases are protected/crippled.

      I only have a few old crippled CDs, and I don't buy any new ones, so I can't tell if the rootkit is on anyone of them.

      However, the Swedish Sony exec is blatantly lying in the article when he claims that Sony won't release any copy-controlled CDs until the protection works well for both the customers and the record labels.

    2. Re:Not in Europe? by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Time to start ordering from amazon.co.uk or so instead of amazon.com, it seems (there's no amazon.se, right?)... thanks for the info.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    3. Re:Not in Europe? by abritisher · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this method of protection is not used at present in Europe because Sony suspect it would be illegal under European law.

  20. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by vegardh · · Score: 2, Informative

    It burned 1-2% CPU _when the player was not running_, for starters... Read the article.

  21. Re:Dupe(s): with a purpose. by idontgno · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Me too!

    No seriously, I agree. Sony's inconceivably bad behavior has to be dragged, squealing and flailing, into the sunlight where it can be properly stomped to gory death with hobnailed boots. No mercy, no PR coverup, no plausible deniability. Corps have to understand, with visceral fear-of-agonizing-death understanding, that this kind of crap will not ever be tolerated. This is a trend which must be stopped cold dead. These shenanigans have to be punished with such finality that any observer centuries from now will intuitively know the immediate and unalterable consequences of this kind of crap.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  22. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you RTFA, you'd know that Sony's DRM allows anyone else to use the hole they have created to put files on your system that will not be detected by antivirus software. That's not a big deal to you?

  23. Contact information for Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a good contact address (email or phone) for Sony to register their dislike of this approach. Active, informed consumers should let companies know their likes or dislikes about product features. Voting with your dollars is always an option as is sending an email or giving a call to management.

    In a quick inspection of the Sony and Sony/BMG website I could not find any e-mail address for management. Any suggestions?

    1. Re:Contact information for Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony Music Entertainment Inc.
      550 Madison Ave
      New York, NY 10022-3211
      sonymusiconline@sonymusic.com

  24. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by LilGuy · · Score: 1

    Suuuuure, that's what they WANT you to think. The next thing you know the FBI will come crashing thru every window in your house perfectly syncronized, and haul you and all your crap off. When you beg and plead to find out what you did wrong, they'll slap you and tell you corporate spies have the right to remain silent.

    They'll run amok with your computers and then let you take the fall.

    Genius.

    All hail the root-overlords.

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
  25. Grounds for suit by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I believe the doctrine of trespass to chattels would apply here.

    Of course, IANAL, IAAEE.

    1. Re:Grounds for suit by jenkin+sear · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking letters of marque and reprisal myself- if they break my machine, and I have no other recourse, I want to go loot their freighters.

      Actually, I wonder if the RICO act applies, particularly if this was done in collusion with the RIAA- it sure seems like collusion, and the uninstall process described above seems like extortion.

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    2. Re:Grounds for suit by chade01 · · Score: 1

      Trespass to chattels of an electronic form (e.g. your computer files, your network) must be accompanied by a showing of physical damage in order to hold up in court.

    3. Re:Grounds for suit by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Hey! You kids! Get the hell offa my chattels afore I sic my dogs on ya!

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  26. Deal with the devil... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I did the responsible thing *cough*. I e-mailed Microsoft and expressed my concern about how this mucking about with the kernel stood in the relation to the EULA, support (who the hell wants to support a kernel patched with unknown code supplied by a third party) and future patches and upgrades. This could cause it to fail to validate like a warez'd install, cause breakage because a patch half-overwrites the hack and any other number of wierd things. I also expressed my concern of how this would reflect on the security and userfriendlyness of Windows (read: Windows has enough issues without Sony messing around). I really hope Microsoft comes out and tell Sony what they think.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Deal with the devil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Microsoft solution would be to install such a thing as part of Vista, and then sell Sony a license to use it.

    2. Re:Deal with the devil... by Arcys · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder how ms, mac and winamp feel about this anti-competitive behaviour against music players?

    3. Re:Deal with the devil... by Holmwood · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is no fan of third party kernel patches, for the reasons you cite. Unfortunately for us (and them), enough existing software does this to make it impossible to change in Win32. But... the good news is this "feature" (unauthorized kernel patching/hacking) is generally not possible in the 64 bit versions of windows. http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/driver/kernel/64bitP atching.mspx [microsoft.com] outlines this. Will they get upset at Sony over this? Probably not since there's other (semi-legitimate) software that does this as well, and they made the deliberate decision to leave the "feature" in windows.

    4. Re:Deal with the devil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a deal with the devil, that's brilliant!

      Sometimes evil is so very evil the only way to fight it is to pit it against itself.

  27. Sony is losing it by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I still stand by my earlier comments on this topic, but at this point it's pretty clear it isn't just a /. rumor. I used to have a lot of respect for Sony, but it's been pretty well dissipated over the years. Their decision to dump PDAs greatly saddened and annoyed me, but I've also had too many problems with their hardware to buy any more... They just couldn't handle the pressure of needing to have ever higher profits and being squeezed between their one low-margin hardware-oriented parts of the company and the high-greed software-oriented parts. Now they've completely trashed their own reputation, and I do feel morally constrained to sell my stock, too.

    I guess I'll send them a sharply worded letter first, but I really don't see any way that I can do any business with a company like this. Not even as a shareholder.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  28. yes, but is it Mac compatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently this rootkit does not run on Mac OSX. Yet another example of the vast library of software available only to Windows users. :-(

    Look at Sony's FAQ,
    http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/faq.html#listeni ng

    The protected CD looses all features and appears as a normal CD on a Macintosh. This really sucks!

    Im switching to Windows!

    1. Re:yes, but is it Mac compatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... how does it behave on *nix, then?...

    2. Re:yes, but is it Mac compatible? by TheUnknownCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I read the FAQ's yesterday and the just added the following overnight:
      • 6. I have heard that the protection software is really malware/spyware. Could this be true?
      • How do I uninstall the software?
      The uninstalling the doesn't say much, it just points us to a form that asks: Where you purchase the disc, Artist Name, Album Title, Store Name, Email Address. That's it. Now, let's say I want to uninstall this rootkit and I fill out the form. What will they do? Send me the instructions on the e-mail? From what Russinovich wrote, it's not a simple and easy task that the average user could do. So they have to send someone over to my house to uninstall this beast from my computer?

      Couldn't Sony foresee the reaction on actual consumers: "I wanna buy this CD, but it has DRM (rootkit or not). Maybe it'll play on my car stereo maybe not. Maybe I'll be able to listen to it on my Discman (made by the same Sony), maybe not. Forget it, I'll get it online."

      David Berlind has some interesting takes on the whole DRM issue.
      --
      Uncopyrightable: The longest word you can write without repeating a letter.
    3. Re:yes, but is it Mac compatible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...CD looses all features...

      As opposed to tightens all features?

  29. odd by JohnLeFucker · · Score: 0
    --
    happy
    1. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on! This parent's a troll, but that link was Teh Funnay.

  30. Standard acronyms by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1
    Looks to me like this could be abbreviated so the typeface could be bigger:

    AYRABTU

  31. Re:Reminds me of something I did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On some windows versions you can do some crazy stuff by putting non-breaking spaces (ascii=255) characters into filenames.
    The other way is to make them a hidden AND system file (you can do it using attrib from the command line). Under default explorer settings these files won't be listed anywhere. This is what windows uses for the Recycle bin and stuff.

  32. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here people, move along etc. Making a mountain out of a molehill with this one.

    Just because you don't care what gets surreptitiously installed on your e-Mac, doesn't mean real users are going to stand for this.

  33. Re:Dupe(s): with a purpose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *has
    *intentionally
      sorry
     
    That'll teach me to use a brighter screen setting.

  34. Is this necessarily legal? by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if you do agree to give Sony the rights to your first-born child in the EULA, wouldn't this violate laws in some states, such as the Consumer Protection Against Computer Spyware Act in California?

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:Is this necessarily legal? by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      Correct, this is why a lot of EULA's end up invalidating themselves by including text which tries to absolve themselves of the law.

      For example, say I get you to sign a contract that says I can shoot you dead without consequence. I then proceed to shoot you dead. Now, since you put your signature on the dotted line you'd think I wouldn't be promptly arrested, tried and convicted right? Wrong, you cannot waive your rights under the law. No matter how much people and companies like to think agreements exempt themselves from the law, they do not.

      I personally think here in the UK this Sony cd and "First 4 Internet" are in breach of the computer misuse act of 1990. Just need to figure out who to contact about this breach.
      I think people in the UK (me included) need to find out who in the police/government to contact and then contact them in large numbers politely telling them of "First 4 Internets" breach of UK law.

  35. This is called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this is called a slashback?

  36. The security industry by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any news on how Symantec, Mcafee, and the other so called security firms are treating this? I'd certainly expect an up-to-date anti-virus software to stop this from installing.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:The security industry by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Sony is a corporation. When it's a corporation doing it, it's not a trojan, it's a feature!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:The security industry by sc0ttyb · · Score: 1

      Nah, this will be added to the "Trusted Applications List", something I can seem to find to edit in my copy of NAV2005.

      --
      "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
  37. Flash: GNU/Linux, BSD Immune To This Foolishness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are *you* waiting for,
    LOSER!
    (caution: side effects of using proprietary software includes possible loss of freedom and data.)

  38. Great new band name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sony and the Rootkits...

  39. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by CoderBob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't perchance work for Sony, do you?

    That aside, anything that hooks into the internals of an OS without my clear and informed authorization is a problem.

    you've got a piece of code in your computer that only gives Sony access. nobody else.

    Please tell me you don't really believe that. Considering how many of MS's products have opened backdoors for people, you're going to trust Sony to "do it better" and leave this software completely secure? It might not suddenly allow crackers "on some IRC network" to get in, but it sure opens up a lucrative bit of research for them- finding the security holes in a DRM rootkit that people don't even know is installed.

    Imagine the trouble in fixing that with a patch.

  40. A wild conspiracy theory: by merc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could be that Sony and the major music labels are using this to create intentional fear, uncertainty and doubt. Who ever said the record labels want you to play music CD's on your computer, in fact wasn't there a genuine effort by the RIAA cartel to create CD's that wouldn't work at all on a PC? If they can't get the end user to cease this undesired activity they can always frighten the luser into submission.

    Stick that music CD into my computer? No you don't, I'll become infected with malware.

    Yes, perhaps it's as the subject suggests, a wild conspiracy theory. It's not as though this industry wanted to create laws to legalize hacking P2P users or anything.

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:A wild conspiracy theory: by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Looks more like a fuckup by careless management to me. Because the price in lost reputation will outweigh any benefits from reduced copying.
      I'd bet they simply did not understand the implications of their "copy protection".
      Or maybe they knew and did not expect it to make much waves.

      But I don't think Sony management wanted the kind of publicity they have now.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    2. Re:A wild conspiracy theory: by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      That's why it was in the form of a rootkit. They didn't want anyone finding to make any waves at all. Their next rootkit will probably even call the police if it detects attempts to remove it by the user ;)

    3. Re:A wild conspiracy theory: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the executives think that, and something funny will happen. In Sony's attempts to stop piracy by shipping viral software on their CDs, what happens? If a user wants the music on their computer, what is their alternative? To pirate it. Sony is essentially promoting piracy if you want Sony music on your computer, because the alternative is a rootkit.

      I've already seen methods used by people to get around this and rip unencumbered MP3s, so the MP3s are out there. And what about Linux or Mac? Does the CD play under those? Can Sony stop that? All it takes is one Linux or Mac user to rip the audio and put it online..

      This is honestly the first time since I've used Morpheus in college that I have seriously considered going back to the download route versus purchasing.

      Thanks for freeing my conscience Sony! Now lets fire up those torrents!

  41. Sony should immediately recall all XCP'd CDs by yeremein · · Score: 2, Informative

    Any malware whose filename/registry keys start with $sys$ will be shielded from antivirus and antispyware software by XCP. This gaping security hole represents a great opportunity for script kiddies. Sony should do the responsible thing and immediately recall all rootkit-infested CDs.

    1. Re:Sony should immediately recall all XCP'd CDs by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if the rootkit has been leaked onto the internet so that we can have a play with it?

      --
      return 0; }
  42. How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by bigtallmofo · · Score: 1

    That you agreed to something and then they installed their software based on your agreement?

    You either work for Sony or you didn't read any of the several articles on this topic. From TFA:

    I checked the EULA and saw no mention of the fact that I was agreeing to have software put on my system that I couldn't uninstall.

    Further down...

    Getting rid of the rootkit proved nigh impossible and caused further problems, according to Russinovich.

    This isn't a simple matter of not having read the EULA and having buyer's remorse. This is a matter of a company deliberately misleading you. If still not convinced, read the article a little further:

    Russinovich noticed that the rootkit's 'cloaking code hides any file, directory, Registry key or process whose name begins with "$sys$". To verify that I made a copy of Notepad.exe named $sys$notepad.exe and it disappeared from view.'

    Hmmm... A program that not only hides itself, a la rootkit but also gives a convenient way for any virus, trojan or malware to hide itself as well!

    For some icing on the cake - no uninstall is made available.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by garcia · · Score: 1

      You either work for Sony or you didn't read any of the several articles on this topic. From TFA:

      I checked the EULA and saw no mention of the fact that I was agreeing to have software put on my system that I couldn't uninstall.


      Well, see, you apparently didn't read his entire blog about the issue. Him saying that he didn't see that part of the EULA (blantantly written at the top) but he also didn't notice that another CD he recently bought from Amazon was crippled by DRM yet his screenshots of the Amazon page show (rather blatantly) that the CD is DRMd.

      I can't side with someone who apparently skims pages (EULAs are one thing but Amazon's page is another). Perhaps you should take another look at his entry for this issue and look at it with what I noticed.

    2. Re:How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by shams42 · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that he bought the CD from Amazon in the first place? He probably bought it elsewhere.

    3. Re:How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by garcia · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume that he bought the CD from Amazon in the first place? He probably bought it elsewhere.

      Why do I assume that people research and read what I'm talking about unless I paste it for them? I should really know better but just for fuck's sake, from his entry about this issue:

      I hadn't noticed when I purchased the CD from Amazon.com that it's protected with DRM software, but if I had looked more closely at the text on the Amazon.com web page I would have known:

      See there? Where it says "I purchased the CD from Amazon.com"? That's how I "assume" he bought the CD from Amazon.

      Perhaps you didn't read it that time. Let me make certain you saw it:

      I hadn't noticed when I purchased the CD from Amazon.com that it's protected with DRM software, but if I had looked more closely at the text on the Amazon.com web page I would have known:

      Did you see it that time? Don't waste our time in the future if you aren't going to even bother to read what I'm talking about. Ok?

    4. Re:How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Well, see, you apparently didn't read his entire blog about the issue. Him saying that he didn't see that part of the EULA (blantantly written at the top) but he also didn't notice that another CD he recently bought from Amazon was crippled by DRM yet his screenshots of the Amazon page show (rather blatantly) that the CD is DRMd.

      "This CD is DRM'ed" and "This CD will install a rootkit on your computer" are not synonyms.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    5. Re:How in the world did parent get mod'd +5? by shams42 · · Score: 1

      Crap, you're right. I read TFA several times and somehow never caught that. Chastising accepted. Have a nice day.

  43. How to beat this... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As soon as you have agreed to be bound by the terms and conditions of the EULA, this CD will automatically install a small proprietary software program (the "SOFTWARE") onto YOUR COMPUTER. The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT. Once installed, the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted. However, the SOFTWARE will not be used at any time to collect any personal information from you, whether stored on YOUR COMPUTER or otherwise.

    Emphasis is mine. Anyways, nothing is the EULA says that I can't just go and delete it. Sure, it may reinstall, but can't we delete it the minute we eject the CD? Can we write a script to do that?

    1. Re:How to beat this... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The SOFTWARE is intended to protect the audio files embodied on the CD, and it may also facilitate your use of the DIGITAL CONTENT.

      Lying about the purpose of the SOFTWARE, are we?

      As I understand the word, facilitate comes from facile meaning 'easy'. If you facilitate something, you make it easy or easier. The SOFTWARE, however, is designed to make my (fair) use of the DIGITAL CONTENT more difficult. Sony is misrepresenting the nature of the SOFTWARE here.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:How to beat this... by mopslik · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anyways, nothing is the EULA says that I can't just go and delete it.

      Except that, if you read through Mark Russinovich's blog, you'll see that it cripples your system when you do this.

      When I logged in again I discovered that the CD drive was missing from Explorer. Deleting the drivers had disabled the CD [drive]. Now I was really mad... I know from my past work with device driver filter drivers that if you delete a filter driver's image, Windows fails to start the target driver.

      He goes on to detail the steps that were necessary to bring his computer back to fully-functional condition. It's not for Joe Q. Public.

    3. Re:How to beat this... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      He goes on to detail the steps that were necessary to bring his computer back to fully-functional condition. It's not for Joe Q. Public.

      But if this guy can do it, can it be done twenty times, then someone smart out there in EFF or something writes a script to remove it and fix things?

      I was actually moslty talking about legally, are you allowed to do it. But is deleting the drivers the only way? Couldn't you nail the rootkit if you know it is there, and then get anything with $sys$ in it's name?

    4. Re:How to beat this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In answer to your question: NO!!!
      The whole point of being a rootkit is to be undetectable. It is very hard to find rootkits and even harder to get rid of them. The only guaranteed way to get rid of one that isn't removed by an anti-virus program is a complete reformat of the entire system.
      Note: Not reinstall; Reformat!! as in delete your ENTIRE harddrive. the only other way is an antivirus program and most won't issue definitions for this since you technically agree to have it installed by the EULA adn therefore it is technically not a virus (least that's what Sony's legal team will claim)

    5. Re:How to beat this... by mopslik · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course, it's fully within your rights to remove the "software". Absolutely.

      But is deleting the drivers the only way? Couldn't you nail the rootkit if you know it is there, and then get anything with $sys$ in it's name?

      You might be able to do so, but it sure doesn't look that easy (ie. use of third-party tools). And even it it was relatively easy, Joe Q. Public would need to be tech-savvy enough to realize that he needed to download a "patch" from the Internet and apply it to his system to restore it. My parents, who just "put the CD in the drive and let it play" would have no clue what to do, short of calling me at 6:00 in the morning to rescue their computer.

      So yes, I'm sure it can be done. But there'd still be a number of broken systems out there.

    6. Re:How to beat this... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      The whole point of being a rootkit is to be undetectable. It is very hard to find rootkits Ah, but I know I have this rootkit. If I were invisible, you could still find me by my shadow. And you'd be even more likely to find me if you knew you were not alone in the room.

      If the purpose of the rootkit is to be undetectable, then the fact we know it's there should make it that much easier.

    7. Re:How to beat this... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Well, fact that they went out of their way to make it invisble to a user, and that the only way to know its there is to have read the documentation, shows that they clearly do not expect end users to read the documentation. Does this not invalidate their EULA? Much like a return policy in a store must be clearly posted? In essence if you put the terms in a place that the other party will not find them, then they certainly did not agree to them. I assume that this is why any updates to the terms of my credit card are sent with the bill instead of just posted on their web site.

    8. Re:How to beat this... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that won't fly. Recall "shrink-wrap EULAs". You agree when you open them. In some cases, you agree when you open the box. So, unless someone's got X-ray vision and goes around reading the EULAs to you, there is no way at all to read them without first agreeing.

    9. Re:How to beat this... by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      Not everywhere. Some slightly more enlightened jurisdictions have laws that still apply no matter what the EULA says. One example is the distance selling regulations - but that's only one example.

    10. Re:How to beat this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, it may reinstall, but can't we delete it the minute we eject the CD? Can we write a script to do that?

      I suppose so. Why should you have to, though?

  44. Solution? by Wessler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get a Mac? According to the FAQ, the disc appears as a normal CD on a Mac. Anyone know if the content is the same, or are there extras that you get for enabling viruses on your PC?

    1. Re:Solution? by Sgt_Peppers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does seem a bit of a flaw in their copy protection that you can stick the disk in a mac (doesn't say about linux) and rip it to MP3/ogg. Most file sharing networks don't tend to be platform specific so windows users can just download it from there. +1 to the list of copy protection systems that annoy legit customers and don't stop piracy.

  45. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Ignignot · · Score: 1

    The problem is that Windows allows some program to mess around with vital drivers and other system internals without screaming murder. This is a clear case where proper use of permissions would prevent potential damage to a system. While Sony is definitely in the wrong for taking advantage of this, the structure of Windows allows this rootkit to be installed.

    --
    I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  46. Anti-PC by vandenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well Sony has all the reasons to mess with PCs stuff. They don't *really* want people to use their PC for any media stuff... Sony wants everybody to use custom hardware solutions made by Sony. PS3, PSP, Memory Stick,.....

    So messing with your PC looks like a good thing to do for Sony (especially since it also f*cks with MS).

    1. Re:Anti-PC by uqbar · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! Because Sony doesn't sell media PC's.

      Actually I think the custom HW solution is Apple's business plan, not Sony's.

      Sony Music has little to do with their consumer electronics divisions.

  47. Uninstallable or un-uninstallable? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
    Inquirer:
    The parts that worry me are that they are putting uninstallable software that could have serious adverse effects on your system without notice or consent.
    I think they mean non-uninstallable.
  48. Hiding directories from Windows by saturndude · · Score: 1
    Try giving directories the +s (system) attribute. Also, some entries need to be made in the desktop.ini file. Directories can be hidden from both Windows Explorer and "Find: Files and Folders". More information here:

    http://www.windows-sucks.com/content/ms-hidden-fil es.shtml/

    1. Re:Hiding directories from Windows by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      MMM, thanks, only way I remembered they were there is I named them backup and backup2 lol :)

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  49. Send your Congressman a CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Everyone send your congressman a complimentary CD, then send them a letter a week later explaing what Sony did to them.

  50. H.R. 2929 by spurtle15 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Has this passed? Is it applicable?

    (4) inducing the user to install a computer software component onto the computer or preventing efforts to block installation of a software component;

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.0 2929:

    If they used racketeering laws to go after the RIAA, why not antispyware legislation against this?

    1. Re:H.R. 2929 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H.R. 2929 is from the 108th Congress. It was passed by the House, but not the Senate. IOW, it died.

      We are now in the 109th Congress. Coincidentally, the new bill number is H.R. 29. Again, the house has passed it, but it is awaiting action by the Senate.

  51. Fix for the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Posted by: Dickrichard | Nov 1, 2005 11:03:07 PM

    I'm posting this via a proxy just in case Sony doesn't like what I post...
    After reading this news story I decided to go after this software and defeat it, and I did.

    The following is how you kill this hidden install. I did this in Windows XP Pro, so attempt on another OS at your discretion. This will require Administrator rights. Please read through the entire instruction set, and if you don't feel comfortable attempting this, then don't. The rest of you, follow me ;)
    1. hit windowsKey+R to open the RUN command. Type services.msc to run the services dialog. Find 'Plug and Play Device Manager' in the list, right click and choose Properties. Under the General tab of the box that comes up, in the middle there should be the "startup type" of the service. Set this value to "disabled" and click OK. Next find the service named 'XCP CD Proxy' and set its startup type to disabled as well. You won't be able to stop these services, only disable them from starting next time Windows starts.
    2. Download and run the latest Blacklight beta from http://www.f-secure.com/blacklight/ This program will find the 'super hidden' CD proxy files we're trying to get rid of. When it finishes searching click next until you reach the screen that shows you all the hidden files it found. Select all these files and click the "rename" button to the right. Windows will restart once you click OK, and the files will be renamed.
    3. Once Windows restarts you will have lost any and all CD/DVD drives. DON'T PANIC! Hit windowsKey+Pause/Break to open up your System dialog. Click on the Hardware tab, then on the "Device Manager" button. Your system will not list any CD/DVD drives, but you should see IDE slot(s) that have little yellow circles with exclamation points over them indicating a device with a problem. In order to restore the drivers to their un-sony-altered state you must right click on the affected device and choose "uninstall driver". Do this for each device with a problem.
    4. Now that you have uninstalled the affected drivers, simply navigate to your Control Panel via the Start Menu and choose "Add Hardware". The add hardware wizard will run and find your previously disabled devices. Your drives are now restored and functional, and this potentially dangerous menace vanquished.
    5. Advanced users may now go and clean up the mess, but this step is not necessary. Delete renamed files, and dare I say it, registry keys that pertain to Sony's program. Use this list for reference: http://www.europe.f-secure.com/v-descs/xcp_drm.sht ml but nothing really beats searching.

    As an added note, once I got my drives back up and running, I popped in the CD that put this program on my computer. I was able to use a multi-session aware program (Roxio) to access the audio portion of the disk and rip MP3s to my hard drive where they will now be listened to in my preferred player the way God intended it to be. Oh, and the only illegal thing that went on here was what Sony did!

    CONSUMER 1 - SONY 0

    P.S. Once you rip MP3s from your Sony disc, burn it the old fashioned way, with gasoline and a match!

    1. Re:Fix for the problem by SlightlyOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Nice writup. And people complain that Linux is complicated!

    2. Re:Fix for the problem by Shippy · · Score: 1

      What's complicated in those steps? It's a bunch of clicky-clicky. Considering he didn't have to edit one config file or compile a single program himself, I'd still say those steps are easier than numerous Linux tasks. The post is a little overrated, though. Mark Russinovich, who wrote the original writeup on this rootkit, already explained how to get rid of it. This person is just summarizing. If he really did figure this all out himself, then we wasted a bunch of time.

      --
      -Shippy
    3. Re:Fix for the problem by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Assuming that this isn't a hoax, and you really do work for Sony, why should we trust you? Or the person who gave you the information, for that matter?

      I'm not entirely surprised, but slightly disappointed that this got modded up to +5 without a questioning voice responding.

      It's a **** rootkit for ****'s sake! If Sony have the audacity to pull off something like this, I wouldn't trust them straight off to give me the truth either.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Fix for the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is this post do you see the author say anything about working for Sony?

    5. Re:Fix for the problem by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Assuming you already have Linux installed on your computer, then what's so complicated about typing
      $ cdparanoia -B
      $ for i in *wav; do lame -h $i && rm $i; done
      ?
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    6. Re:Fix for the problem by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Nope in this case Linux is far easier since the damn root kit won't even work on linux...nothing to do, already protected from being owned.

      --


      Got Code?
    7. Re:Fix for the problem by robfoo · · Score: 1

      It probably got modded up because the moderators read the article, read his post and had some experience with windows administration (hey, this is /. - no one would complain about windows if they hadn't used it at some point!)

      Everything he said makes sense from the POV of removing the rootkit as described in the original article. Nothing will harm your computer - you uninstall the device driver and then add it again.

      Although I do applaud your wariness - if everyone was as cautious about applying 'fixes' they read on the internet, Tech Support people would have a lot less to do!

  52. Digital Restriction Management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just say Digital Restriction Management, and it'll dawn. Say the corporations use the word "Rights" just to make people believe it is good for them.

    This whole thing *could* be a pilot of Sony, testing the water for Microsoft and the others of TCPA. Now, we're seeing a backlash, but then they offer it through Microsoft Windows, and all is supposedly good again.

    Don't sell your freedom so cheap.

  53. ... until removed or deleted. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    See that part about "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until removed or deleted"?

    ... but they conveniently forget to point out that their software can't be removed or deleted by the common user...

    So, technically they are in the clear (in the same way that they would be in the clear if they said "the SOFTWARE will reside on YOUR COMPUTER until pigs grow wings"), but what they are doing is still morally very wrong...

    As far as being able to uninstall it via "add/remove programs", I wasn't aware that this made software dismissable via legal grounds.

    It's just not a matter of failing to supply some user-friendly functionality to make it extra easy to uninstall.

    Such functionality might take time to develop, and so a case could be made that the developper just didn't feal it worthwhile to spend the effort...

    But in this case, the developers went out of their way to make it extra difficult to detect, let alone remove, their software. Even without Add/remove functionality, you could still remove the files and registry keys manually, if the software was just sloppy, rather than malicious. But in the present case, the software's files and reg keys are hidden, so you can't just remove them. And if you do find the trick how to de-activate the rootkit, removing the resources will break the OS if not done properly (disabled CD driver), meaning that for a normal user the only alternative is to reinstall the OS. Not nice!

    1. Re:... until removed or deleted. by garcia · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... but they conveniently forget to point out that their software can't be removed or deleted by the common user...

      You can have a Sony rep contact you and they will help you remove it. Sounds like good service to them.

      but what they are doing is still morally very wrong...

      I don't see what this has to do with the discussion at hand. Yes, we all know that corporations have little or negative morals. The beginning point of this thread was whether or not Sony could be chased down legally for this install. I proposed that they could not. My hypothesis still stands unchallenged.

    2. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I challenge your hypothesis.

      The SOFTWARE is designed to hide itself, alters the functionality of the machine to the detriment of its performance and can cause it to malfunction(prevent CD/DVD readers/writers from working properly), opens up the machine to further attack, and finally reduces the stability of the machine. The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    3. Re:... until removed or deleted. by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

      Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands. You know why? Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc. So, regardless of YOUR opinion on the subject, you can certainly guarantee that this particular EULA will stand until another fails.

    4. Re:... until removed or deleted. by orderb13 · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember reading something similar when congress was passing new anti-spyware laws. Gator includes some little caveat in their EULA about installing software and the verbage of the law was written to expressly deny this ability. I don't remember exactly, not have the time to track down, but I'm pretty sure that there are grounds here for lawsuits under that law. If nothing else someone can try to get a class action going.

    5. Re:... until removed or deleted. by pegr · · Score: 1

      I, too, will challenge your hypothesis:

      They didn't sell me a CD. I says it's a CD and it plays on (most) CD players, but if the disk itself does not conform to Philip's redbook audio spec, it ain't a CD... (If it were, I wouldn't need this DRM crap to exercise my "fair use" rights...)

    6. Re:... until removed or deleted. by lunarlander · · Score: 1

      Indeed, there are laws that rule on this, such as issues of merchantability (is it something that can be sold?). But the rootkit DRM isn't actually malicious, in that it is not intended to cause harm to the user or computer. It could be argued that the drive manufacturers whose drivers malfunction due to the DRM could be found at fault, depending on how the size of their legal organ compares to Sony's.

      The fair use rights to copyrighted works is something that has essentially been removed from copyright law, thanks to the Soni Bono and DCMA copyright amendments, so I'm skeptical that anyone will be able to seriously challenge that this inflicts harm or is malicious to the end user who's using a machine whose drivers work in accordance with Microsoft's guidelines.

      Is it wrong? Yes. Is it amoral? Yes. But the law doesn't do a very good job at protecting those who can't buy it.

      Now, as mentioned previously, the court of public opinion is something else. Newsweek would be great place to hear of this.

      I'm actually surprised this vulnerability hasn't been exploited sooner by someone who doesn't have a financial stake on this.

    7. Re:... until removed or deleted. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Moraly wrong has alot to do with it. I will try to explain it with some of the liberal self defense laws in some states.

      In some states you can legaly shoot and kill a person if you can prove your life /our you thought your life is in danger and you had no other way to escape. This ion the surface seems fin but if i bully you into being aggresive enough that i can make this claim and basicaly legaly murder you, I shouldn't be and most likley not covered by this protection.

      In software,contracts and general product representation, There is a thin line between moral and legaly injust. On the same note as the murder/selfdefense, Once i agree to a license I am bound, but if i am tricked into agreeing to something that i wouldn't normal agree to due to lack of supporting information or intentional wording that misrepresents what a normal person would understand the clause to mean, It is grounds to void the contract and possible legal problems could follow. Many states have laws governing this with consumer protection laws, product misrepresentation laws, general contract laws, and the newer spyware/malicious software laws. I belive there might also be a federal law that might come into play too.

      In this case as well as some others, moraly wrong "might" lead to criminal or civil penalties.

    8. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rhetoric · · Score: 2, Insightful
      >The EULA, which you cited, is intentionally vague and misleading, and certainly does not absolve Sony of responsibility for the above problems caused by their SOFTWARE. Also, just because it's in the EULA, sorta(!), does not make it >legal. Sony is clearly being deceptive with these products and their EULA, and >there are laws on the books to protect consumers from such action.

      The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

      >Furthermore, it is not a safe bet to assume an EULA is a binding contract, there is precedent both ways on this, it depends on the EULA and the judge's opinion, and there are all kinds of laws regarding contract validity.

      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands. You know why? Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc. So, regardless of YOUR opinion on the subject, you can certainly guarantee that this particular EULA will stand until another fails.


      Why are you so vehemently opposed to the very IDEA that people could sue Sony? From reading your posts here, I'd guess you are insecure and you want everyone to just give up and feel as weak as you in the face of teh uber Sony...

      The post I've quoted essentially says: "you dont have a case because legislation can be vague, and because you can't afford it." Neither of these two "points," has ANY bearing in the arguement over whether or not there is LEGAL justification for a suit. Please stop posting flamebait.
      --

      "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
    9. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is yes, but the EULA hasn't been truly tested, thus why it still stands.

      I think the bnetd case pretty much gives software publishers carte-blanche in restricting what you can do. They held that (1) the EULA was enforceable (2) it removes the consumers rights granted by copyright and DMCA laws (3) The UCC covers the transaction because the software is goods sold (4) the software is licensed, not sold, because the EULA says so.

      In short - EULAs are enforceable, even when they are wordy, vague, and contradictory. And, they are contracts since they say "if you don't agree, return this for a refund" - even though there is no realistic way to actually get your money back for opened software.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    10. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rhetoric · · Score: 2, Informative

      to clarify: DMCA != EULA. Not enough money to sue != no legal basis to sue.

      --

      "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
    11. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

      Right, but the DMCA is not an EULA. It is not covered by consumer protection laws.

    12. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc.


      Actually, people do. Just say that the CD is a shoddy piece of work that simply sends noise to the speakers/headphones/whatever. Be sure to recommend a better alternative as well, such as "Loud Noise Mix #36", some random Heavy Metal CD, or another compilation - preferably from another company.

      It revolves around strength in numbers - the more people you can convince that the music company in question is substandard, the better. In fact, you could provide them with alternate sources of music (e.g. legal downloads, or iTunes, etc.)

    13. Re:... until removed or deleted. by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they don't take it back, you have legal grounds because then you're practically forced into agreeing. The courts said an EULA is to be expected and a no-reverse-engineering clause is to be expected. If there's some additional stuff that you cannot be reasonably expected to know about beforehand AND they refuse to undo your sales contract (which you can be reasonably expected to think they'd do) then it's either being forced into accepting the contract (not sure about the legal term but I think it's not extortion when it involves contracts) or being sold a good that's not what they told you it was (fraud, you are expected to know that there's some form of EULA but you're also expected to assume the standard terms, these days more and more crap is being thrown in).

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:... until removed or deleted. by KDR_11k · · Score: 2

      But the rootkit DRM isn't actually malicious, in that it is not intended to cause harm to the user or computer.

      Even with good intentions hackers go to jail. There was a virus that patched your computer against the vulnerability it exploited, while that was not malicious the thing didn't work and caused big damage, the writer went to jail. Since this thing looks like a virus and acts like a virus it IS a virus.

      The EULA talks about some DRM mechanism, it does not make clear that the mechanism involves a virus that replaces drivers from other manufacturers (anticompetitive behaviour?). If the courts said it was covered by the EULA and Sony is clear that's a dangerous precedent. Anyone care to send the judge responsible a CD that autoruns and infects his PC with a latent virus that overwrites all files commonly edited by users (.doc, .pdf, .txt, etc) with garbage the day after they've been edited or when some backup program is run while showing an innocuous looking EULA that pretends to install some thank-you greeting card program?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    15. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Concertina · · Score: 1

      I think the bnetd case pretty much gives software publishers carte-blanche in restricting what you can do. They held that (1) the EULA was enforceable (2) it removes the consumers rights granted by copyright and DMCA laws (3) The UCC covers the transaction because the software is goods sold (4) the software is licensed, not sold, because the EULA says so.

      The bnetd case only dictates the legality of EULAs in the 8th circuit, which includes such illustrious beacons of civil rights as Arkansas, Missouri, the Dakotas, and Nebraska. If you are unfortunate enough to live within the enforceable jurisdiction, I feel for you, and advise you to consider moving now; when the revolution comes, you really won't want to be on the wrong side of the fence.

    16. Re:... until removed or deleted. by griffjon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they now link to the kind folks who made this software for 'em and will provide an uninstall feature... ...but the damned thing requires ActiveX.

      http://updates.xcp-aurora.com/unsupported.aspx

      Sigh.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    17. Re:... until removed or deleted. by griffjon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, to be precise, that takes you to a "patch" that "removes" the cloaking "feature".

      Makes me even less likely to open up IE and let it run activeX controls

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    18. Re:... until removed or deleted. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      In some states you can legaly shoot and kill a person if you can prove your life /our [sic] you thought your life is in danger and you had no other way to escape. This ion [sic] the surface seems fin [sic] but if i bully you into being aggresive enough that i [sic] can make this claim and basicaly [sic] legaly [sic] murder you, I shouldn't be and most likley [sic] not covered by this protection.

      IANAL.... This is all MHO, etc....

      Self defence is an affirmative defence to murder in most states. And I think you are misrepresenting the principle. Indeed, one can sometimes offer the defence that one's family members were in danger as well, so the defence not to limited to ones self.

      If I were a lawyer and in particular a prosecutor, I would argue in the case you described that it was not bona fide self defense because because the defendant was clearly the instigator of the entire incident. Personally I don't think the defense in this case would fly in most courts and the jury would be asked to determine whether the defendant instigated the entire situation and hence criminal charges might apply (at least manslaughter, if not murder, depending on the facts in the case).

      If I move and someone follows me and tries to kill my wife, I may have some leeway under the law to kill this person. But if that person was seriously provoked by me to start with to the point of thinking that his action was self-defense, I would think that I would lose that right though it would be a matter of the jury to decide and they would have to decide that the self-defense defense did not raise reasonable doubts to the matter. So it might certainly be harder to prove, but I have a hard time thinking that it would be so cut and dried to be cart blanche under the law.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    19. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some states such as Virginia the EULA must notify the user that there is no way to uninstall the software before it is installed, otherwise they must provide a full uninstall program.

    20. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is it amoral? Yes.
      No. It is immoral.
    21. Re:... until removed or deleted. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1
      then it's either being forced into accepting the contract (not sure about the legal term but I think it's not extortion when it involves contracts)

      I'm not sure of the term either, but it basically means there should be some negotiation involved. The "negotiation" of "return it if you don't like this" has been deemed acceptable by the 8th Circuit.

      I don't know that anyone has actually tried make use of this out, but generally retailers won't honor it. Supposedly, you can ship the package back to the publisher for a refund (probably not to include shipping costs), and they will send you a check in 8-10 weeks (most likely). Whether this actually works is up to debate. The court never heard the argument.

      Unfortunately, I doubt they ever will. Courts seem to want to accept "it's *possible* to refuse the agreement" without consideration concerning how *practical* it is for the average consumer.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    22. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rcbarnes · · Score: 1

      I concur. My father, who is a Professor of Law at Ole Miss Law School (specializing in Business and Contract law), just published a (roughly 80 page) paper in a rather prestigious Law Journal about EULAs. His contention is that they are not necessarily binding, especially when they are clearly written without intent of review by the recipient. His focus was on long ones, where even the OpenOffice.org EULA was pushing it at two scroll boxes worth of text, but he did suggest that all EULAs are now reasonably in the scope of presumed non-review, since the numerous long ones cause everyone to start ignoring them all.

      --
      "Fight for lost causes. You may discover they weren't."
    23. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rcbarnes · · Score: 1
      --
      "Fight for lost causes. You may discover they weren't."
    24. Re:... until removed or deleted. by rcbarnes · · Score: 1

      Damnit. Ignore parent. I'm an idiot. :-/

      --
      "Fight for lost causes. You may discover they weren't."
    25. Re:... until removed or deleted. by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      A small nitpick: they did sell you a CD, because the CD is indeed the medium, just not standard Audio CD. It would still rightly count as at least a Data CD.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  54. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You are assuming that Sony has (a) written the code properly, and (b) there's no way to exploit this code externally from the running system. Anything that hides itself from the running process list and prevents itself from being uninstalled is a potential hole in your system. Example...there is a buffer overflow in Sony's DRM software, which you can't remove because you can't see it. It's running as a driver, as the "system" user, which means it can do pretty much anything it wants. A userspace program (LimeWire?) triggers this DRM by trying to play a Sony DRM'd song, and triggers the buffer overflow exploit. Once this exploit is triggered, the attacker can download whatever they want to the compromised machine, creating another zombie, or whatever they want really.

    This is just an example, I'm sure a real cracker could come up with something doable.

  55. Legal Justification for Downloading Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, if they wan to play that, then the reverse play is that you have to download music as data files because music CDs constitute a threat to your computing environment. In effect, they just legitimatized music downloading as a way for consumers to escape injury (in the legal sense) from their crapware.

  56. I wish the market would take care of this. by elgee · · Score: 1

    If enough people complained to Sony and stopped buying their products, they would likely change this policy. But as many people have said, the vast majority either are ignorant of this or simply don't care.

  57. Grounds? you want grounds? by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. lets see. If I recall correctly:

    1> SONY installs a rootkit and did not say they were installing a rootkit. A much less damaging form of spyware would have been able to accomplish the tasks that SONY claimed the rootkit was intended for. (If your PC were a neighborhood, you might agree to having a security patrol, but I doubt you would agree to giving them the keys to your home, code for your alarm, and potentially access to your bank accounts, tax returns, and video library)

    2> The rootkit SONY installed has known vulnerabilities - meaning that folks other than SONY would be able to use the rootkit for their own purposes. (Back to PC as neighborhood, not only is that security watch doing a whole lot more than you realized, but anyone who knows the secret handshake is a fully authorized member of the patrol - with the same authority as the head honcho.

    Now, think of what a class action lawsuit will mean when every member of the afdfected class can claim financial damages based simply off the documented costs of repairing "damage" to systems done from "I love you". (Several thousands of dollars minimum PER PC) - or, to put it another way:

    3> Profit! (but not for SONY)

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  58. Not just "Sony" by uqbar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Boycott all of Sony Music - this includes labels like:
    Arista Records
    BMG
    Columbia Records
    Epic Records
    J Records
    Jive Records
    LaFace Records
    Legacy Recordings
    Provident Music Group
    RCA Records
    RCA Victor Group
    RLG - Nashville
    Sony
    So So Def Records
    Verity Records

    As a recording engineer / producer I'm against piracy - but I also hate DRM screwing with my machine and making it hard to enjoy the music I purchased in the way I want.

    Support indy labels, and write letters to artists you like that are on majors - tell them to move on to an indy label or start their own.

    And if you're really mad (as I am) boycott all of Sony. While Sony music walks to its own drummer, the parent company can't be loving the bad publicity.

    I stopped buying all Sony products (including the pro gear I use as an audio engineer) when they initially started their annoying DRM. It is easy to break, but makes normal use of the CD harder.

    1. Re:Not just "Sony" by fireweaver · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this has been said before, but I'll say it again anyway. If the labels (not just Sony) are that much against piracy, there are two things they could do that would go a long way towards reducing it.

      [1] Drop the price of CDs to $10. This alone would boost sales since people would also be inclined to buy more CDs at one time than they normally do.

      [2] Drop the DRM altogether. I think this does more to encourage copyright violation than anything else for the simple reason that if you tell people that they cannot do something, someone out there is going to do it anyway, either to spite you or to show that it _can_ be done.

      [3] Sony specific: Drop the rootkits entirely lest someone file a class action lawsuit against you for computer tresspass and destruction. Personally, I hope someone does; if they win, it could set a useful legal precedent.

    2. Re:Not just "Sony" by rebelx2 · · Score: 1

      But do I have to quit playing Evercrack as well?

    3. Re:Not just "Sony" by Jeng · · Score: 0

      There is no downside to quitting evercrack.

      Jenguran
      lvl 70 shaman
      retired after 6 years of wasted life.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:Not just "Sony" by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for me it's much easier to just decline to buy ANY music CDs. The Independents don't make themselves easy to recognize. They need to organize, like the "organic farmers" did. (OTOH, legislation currently in the wings may remove the branding advantage that the organic farmers have created for themselves...by allowing quite dubious products to be labeled as "organic" [well...they are mainly carbon based molecules, but that's not the justification being used].)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  59. Re:Reminds me of something I did by ValuJet · · Score: 1

    obviously you didn't look too hard.

    Open up any windows directory.
    Go to tools.
    Folder Options.
    Go to the view tab.
    Find the radio button that says show hidden files and folders.
    Click that button.
    Say OK.

  60. Don't buy Sony kit by blacksky · · Score: 1

    I bought a sony minidisc player a few years ago. It was a lovely bit of kit in the era before iPods, which allowed you to transfer mp3's onto minidisc. Unfortunatly the incredibly buggy (windows only) software and associated DRM crud that provided the interface between it and my pc completely crippled it to the extent that I got rid of it as soon as possible. I vowed never to give sony my hard-earned again. So far I've stuck to it, which has probably cost them in the region of £2000 based on various gadget and electronic equipment purchases I've made since.

  61. There's more than one law here. by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is part of what you need if you want to listen to Sony's music legally.

    On the one hand, it's perfectly legal for me to play that CD on my laptop without running that software. Even assuming a clickthrough license is valid, I can simply refuse to accept that license, refuse to install the software, and treat it as an ordinary audio CD. If I'm not running Windows on my laptop, in fact, I don't even have an opportunity to use their spyware-enhancer.

    On the other hand, even if it WAS a legal requirement, any contract that involves on or the other of the parties performing an illegal act as a requirement for fulfilling that contract is void. There's a reasonable case that this software violates the DMCA and thus the license is invalid.

    Which takes you back to the first hand.

    1. Re:There's more than one law here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least Microsoft is a little more forecoming on its shortcomings and will admit they @#$%^ up.

  62. Other affected CDs by vmxeo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I showed the last to one of my coworkers, who immediately started worried about a recent Switchfoot CD he played on his machine. Sure enough, not only did the CD have DRM on it, but it seems to have installed the same rootkit as the example given in the Sysinternals website. Which of course makes me wonder, how many CDs did Sony put this into?

    I'm starting to think it'd be worthwhile to create a domain policy to prevent this malware from running on any of our network machines....

    1. Re:Other affected CDs by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to think it'd be worthwhile to create a domain policy to prevent this malware from running on any of our network machines....

      Yes, disabling the CD Autorun would indeed be an appropriate domain policy.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  63. Blu-ray? by PickyH3D · · Score: 1
    Since they'll be making the initial drives, then I can only imagine that this may find itself as part of the real driver for it, or at least enable it to ease its way onto our computers some other way (probably their movies).

    Oh, and screw purchasing a PS3. Sony wants to screw the consumer, then screw them. I never really did like Sony, but this is just another good reason.

  64. This is just the first. by _Pablo · · Score: 1

    If consumers don't complain loud enough, then other companies will feel that the "rootkit" style DRM is now acceptable and everyone will start doing it. I wonder what then happens when multiple DRM schemes are patching the kernel function table and adding filters to the IDE chain...my guess is that without some serious quality development and testing, lots of consumers are going to have dead Windows installs because they legally paid for "content-protected" music...meanwhile everyone else is happy with their MP3s.

    --
    $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    1. Re:This is just the first. by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      "Complain"?

      How about "demand arrests and prosecutions". This is not an issue of contract-law, any more than Sobig was.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    2. Re:This is just the first. by _Pablo · · Score: 1
      Yes, "Complain".


      Dear Sony,

      I am appalled by the underhanded, dangerous and wasteful DRM scheme you have put on product x, so I shall not purchase it.

      Yours truly,

      A. Consumer


      You can be sure that hundreds or thousands of letters like that, with a decline in sales is going to have more effect on their DRM policy than the threat of a court case. After all, with our courts, law makers and politicians allowing companies ever greater digital freedoms to protect their products at the expense of individuals rights, they may even win the right to root peoples machines.
      --
      $2B OR NOT $2B = $FF
    3. Re:This is just the first. by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      For sony to win such a case (and I hope they would), the implications would be fantasic - it would demand that an anonymous 3rd party has more rights to your machine than you do. You know what that means?

      It means I have full rights to every machine on this planet (except my own), and noone can do a damned thing about it. Electric bill too high? No problem - Sony will have proven that you have complete authority to install any software and make any modifications you wish to the power company's computing systems.

      There's no way around it - the issue needs to be pressed in a criminal context, to once-and-for-all determine *exactly* who owns this machine that is sitting in front of me. And more importantly, determine who *doesn't* (including children, neighbors, wife, dog, whatever). Take this concept to the general case and it'll become clear - I hire a $6/hr temp to type some junk in. They have... exactly... what authority to consent to anything? Install anything? Do anything? And they have ability to delegate my authority to 3rd parties like Sony? No, they don't... and this is a perfect opportunity to demand a legally enforced correction of the market's abuses, by simply enforcing laws that already exist, and putting people in jail where they belong.

      Somebody uses social and exploit engineering to install a pile of crap onto my machine, stealing bandwidth, storage, and cpu assets. It's legal. I do that exact same thing to a machine owned by Cray, or perhaps to this neat Sun Grid... and I go to jail for the next decade. Bullshit, the actions are the same - and they are both felonies.

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  65. Charge for unauthorized access. PLEASE READ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen something similar done with telemarketers and there is a court precedence upholding it.

    Place ads in major newspapers stating you are going to charge individuals and/or companies who install software or change system settings without prior authorization, $1000 per hour to restore my system with a $1000 minimum charge. The newspaper ad serves as public notice to your business intent.

    You probably need to place an ad in every major city where you plan to charge the comapny or individual.

    Definitely place an ad in Redmond, WA.

    Users should form a site that lists software and service companies and what state they are located in.

    Check with your lawyer first. Laws vary from state to state.

  66. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1, Informative

    The problem can exist for any drivers that operate under kernel mode, which is unfortunately true for Linux as well. Fortunately, while Linux supports fewer devices than windows and the functionality is often more spartan, (i.e. 3D graphics cards) we are fortunate that they don't make it into the kernel until the are solid.

    The BSD zealots have a point here - it is more secure to have all drivers run in separate sandboxes, so a borked driver won't bring down the whole OS.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  67. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A clean install of Windows with only "certfied for windows XP" software is rock solid.

    you've never used the .NET development suite before.

    it's far from rock solid. Same as Microsoft Office 2003 I get crashes there as well on a regular basis with all the users here. Open a office 97 word file with a simple macro and watch how sometimes it blows up.

    windows XP with NOTHING elese installed and unplugged from the net and with no 3rd party drivers or any performance hardware is rock solid.

    as soon as you use it it becomes less stable. Not unstable but less stable.... bluescreens maybe every 3 months or so.

  68. Should have posted AC by doublem · · Score: 1

    Since what you jokingly recommended was vandalism, and thus illegal, you really should have posted that AC.

    Of course we all know you were kidding, and you didn't mean it as a serious recommendation, but if someone were to go out and do it, and the jackasses who developed this root kit see your post, then you could find yourself on the receiving end of some legal hassles.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Should have posted AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again, so could they; their XCP and XCP Red software does contravene the UK Computer Misuse Act, and it's illegal for them to have licensed or distributed it to anyone.

  69. Re:Dupe(s): with a purpose. by Taladar · · Score: 1

    I propose to introduce a death sentence for corporations as an international treaty: After a corporations gets caught screwing their customers or bribing (campaign contributing for you in the US) politicians they are forced to sell everything belonging to the company and the money is donated. Neither employees nor shareholders get anything. That should help bring some honesty back to big business.

  70. My Letter to Sony by macklin01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hello.

    I have just learned about the malware that Sony has started to add to "compact disks" (in quotes, because Sony breaks the CD standard) via poorly-written DRM software from First4Internet. It is simply unconscionable that Sony would resort to such unethical lengths to prevent the pirating of a software. In fact, criminal trespass comes to mind, given that the software differs from what is described in the EULA and non-removable.

    I'm outraged at this behavior demonstrated by Sony, and I can assure you that I am no longer a Sony customer. In short, although I am a computer enthusiast/technologist who builds his own systems and enjoys gaming, and although I am a scientist who uses high-end computing resources on a daily basis, I won't be purchasing any of the following from Sony in the next few years:

    1) Stereos and portable audio equipment
    2) Flat screen televisions, plasma TV's, etc
    3) High-end computer LCD monitors
    4) Laptop computers
    5) Computer CD and DVD drives
    6) Sony-branded CD, DVD, and floppy disk media
    7) PlayStation 2 or 3
    8) PlayStation Games
    9) PlayStation Portable

    and needless to say,

    10) Sony and BMG music.

    If you break standards on DVD equipment, add Sony and Columbia TriStar movies to that list.

    Thank you for making my future purchase decisions so much easier.

    Sincerely,

    ****

    --
    OpenSource.MathCancer.org: open source comp bio
  71. Re:Sony is Japanese for crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, Folks

    I ahve long known that Sony is NOT one of hte biggest electronic firms selling within Japan. In fact, it is known for its quick development turnarounds and use of second and third-rate parts. In the rest of the world, however, it remains a giant that oversells its products and dumps most of its old stock onto the third-world market.

    This should come as no surprise.

  72. The Solution is Simple Folks!-Be a Fool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Me, I think I'll just pirate all my music from now on. That way I don't have to worry about any of this DRM nonsense!"

    And what's so insightful about being a pirate? You don't actually solve any of the problems. You're just hiding from them. The companies get bigger, and your "Fair Use" rights (amoungst others) gets smaller.* And the best solution you can come up with is "Well, I'll get mine!". Stupid! Simply stupid.

    *And that's just one of the side-effects, assuming you've actually been paying attention for the past couple years.

  73. Better yet... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    Send him a Sony DRMed CD, then rename all of the files on his hard disk so they start with $sys$, then watch the fun....

  74. CMT.com removing posts about Van Zant rootkit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There have been at least 2 posts removed from the Van Zant message board on CMT.com about the insideous DRM rootkit their CD installs. One of these post was mine. http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166915&cid= 13929028 I am emailing CMT.com to determine why my post was removed.

    Make no mistake, the mebers of Van Zant are just as culpable in this as Sony Music. please let them know at

    Vector Management

    Ken Levitan and Ross Schilling

    P.O. Box 120479

    Nashville, TN 37212

    Phone: 615-269-6600

    Fax: 615-269-6002

    Thank you Tapeworm

    1. Re:CMT.com removing posts about Van Zant rootkit by planetoid · · Score: 1

      It looks like a better letter to send would be one to the Attorney General of Tennessee. This amounts to nothing else but a crime which deserves to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, plain and simple.

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  75. Forget MAC, how about Wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll know Wine is finally ready when it can get nailed by a Windows rootkit.

    Great. Now I've got this image stuck in my mind of a fat Orson Wells saying "We will sell no Wine before its time." :-P

  76. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by failure-man · · Score: 1

    Slightly offtopic question: I come from the Linux side and was unaware that BSD could sandbox drivers. How does this work, how well, and on what BSDs?

  77. List of affected CDs? by Timo_UK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there a list of CDs that are affected, except the one Mark Russinovich used.

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
    1. Re:List of affected CDs? by robfoo · · Score: 1

      This guy's got a list here, or you can try this google search.

  78. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't GNU/Linux be the same way if you were running as root? Aren't there lots of people that will just give up their root/Administrator passwords the second some unknown software says it needs them? There's a Sony FAQ about this software that's a few links away from the F-Secure article. It contains the following gem:

    "You must log on to your computer with Administrator rights or Power User rights to fully use the disc. Normally, you should have Administrator rights, unless you are working in a corporate environment in which case, you'll need to contact your IT department to have them install the software for you.

    On Windows XP Home Edition system you will need Administrator rights (typically the default setting) as well, not User rights."

    Yes, you and I realize that's some ridiculous bullshit, and that if you disable autoplay the CD will act just like, well, a Real CD. Most users will think, "I'd better figure out what these Administrator rights are and install them on my computer so I can play this CD. I hope that doesn't cost me more money." Another box popping up saying, "this program want to overrite vitalfile.sys, this is very risky, are you OK with this?" wouldn't really help anyone that didn't already know; they just want to hear their music.

    You're absolutely right, though, that this does represent a problem with Windows. Windows should not allow this, Unix should not allow this, BeOS should not allow this, VMS should not allow this. Windows actually has an easier way to handle it than most OSes, since it knows about the user's GUI and can pop up an alert (the Linux kernel would have to figure out whether the user was running at the console or in X or with some other crazy setup).

    I've been thinking about potential solutions; perhaps offer a physical device with which you must confirm any module load? But this handcuffs remote users (for most systems there's probably no need to ever remotely load moduls, though. I wouldn't mind, as long as there was an option.) It would be convinient if when a module was loaded for the first time the OS could analyze it and figure out what types of behavior it would modify, and present this information to the user. Though if the idea is to modify other modules, like this program seems to do, a different type of protection (probably user-level) is required.

    The only real layer of security is users, because only they can overlook the technical methods that software is using to make the value judgement, "Do I want this on my computer?" Running as Administrator or root by default diminishes a user's ability to make this judgement and puts them paradoxically in less control over their computer. That is one aspect of this for sure that can be placed squarely on Microsoft and Windows. If Apple can completely switch around thier OS technology and tell companies, "if you want to run nicely on OS X then re-release all your software", then certainly Microsoft could use its gargantuan power to pressure companies to write software that follows a sane security model. It would solve many problems with Windows as it is used today.

  79. Realplayer best way to use Minidisk by doublem · · Score: 1

    I found that Real player's ability to write files to a Minidisk made it a far more functional alternative than the actual software that Sony makes for minidisk players.

    It's the primary reason I kept realplayer on my windows PC for so long.

    Then I got an iPod, and the Minidisk player went the way of the dodo for me.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Realplayer best way to use Minidisk by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      In 1998 I almost bought a MiniDisc recorder. But I changed my mind at the last minute; and instead, I bought enough bits to build a PC and one of the first ever ATAPI CD-R drives. Best decision I ever made.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  80. It doesn't scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What gets me is this DRM crap is I doubt Sony's given any thought to how this all scales over time. Assume that ALL record companies start using this method and every one is different. You could quickly end up with 8 or 10 different rootkits on your machine - everyone of them trying to manage your CD player - and who knows, maybe your harddrive. Then assume that Sony and the other companies decide that they need update their rootkits over time - with versions that aren't compatible with each other... you could end up with different rootkit for each CD you've ever loaded into your machine. Having several hundred rootkits installed on a machine would probably cause some serious performance and security issues, assuming they could all peacefully co-exist. This is one massively broken idea that Sony has and it has to be stopped NOW.

    JR

  81. Indeed--Sony in violation of DMCA! by Urusai · · Score: 1

    By circumventing trivial measures on my computer to prevent people from installing rootkits, Sony is in violation of the DMCA. One problem--I don't own a single Sony product. Oh well, I guess I'll just have to settle for being a vicarious victim.

  82. Argghhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo...if you download the cd illegally, you have a small chance of getting a virus...but...if you buy it legally your guarenteed....hmmmm....go pirating

  83. Why so hesitant... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

    ...to call this action the FELONY that it is?

    If I gave you some medium that did this, EULA or not, I'd go to jail.

    Compound this with the person who inerts this CD (and thereby is the party who agrees to this EULA) being a MINOR... this entire situation is complete insanity. Is there no concept of authority anymore? Any a$$hole that can sit at my keyboard is automatically a fully authorized proxy for me? In effect I have ZERO authority, and FULL accountability?

    In short if the next Bagle variant contains a good EULA, it'll be perfectly legal.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  84. Sony And MS?? by MindSlap · · Score: 0

    From the Washington post:
    Full page: http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/sec...raids_hack.h tml

    "As long as the attacker's file begins with that prefix, it will go undetected by most antivirus programs out there," Hypponen said. He added that installing the Sony program on a machine running Windows Vista -- the beta version of Windows' next iteration -- "breaks the operating system spectacularly.

    So.. Not only does it embed itself in current versions of windoze, but it seems to whack the upcoming Vista(Longhorn). Gee.. Ya think that would be a 'problem' for folks a few years from now when they play those CD's on their shiny new computers?
    This is what happens when you get this 'low level' regarding wedging drivers so close to the core.

    And ya think MS would 'work with sony' to 'fix' this?
    Such a collaberation would be prima facia evidence that MS is just as evil regarding DRM. But then again, we already know this regardless. MS DRM and their 'trusted computing' is a joke. Yet, if they were to modify low level driver to 'accomodate' Sony's ROOTKIT, thats just going TOO FAR. Obviously performance and stability would still be taking a back seat to MS's so-called 'security initiatives' of last year.
    Again... Its an evil web Sony is weaving. I'll be very curious as to what MS will do about this regarding Vista. Will they go for stability and simply advise everyone not to load that Sony junk at risk of whacking the machine? Or will they 'accomodate' Sony by patching the native MS drivers to 'work with' a single, particular,specific and narrowly defined Rootkit?
    Let the games begin!!

  85. Let them know how you feel.... by Hachey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Follow this link to send a comment to Sony. I know I won't be buying their products anymore, and I sure as hell let them know.

    --
    Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
  86. Boycotts are worthless... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... for stuff like this. If you care enough to REALLY do something about it, there are really only two things to do:

    1. File a tip with the US Department of Homeland Security

      Intentionally or otherwise, what the program is exploiting a flaw in a popular operating system in a way that not only enables them to control access to the data on the CD -- which itself is illegal, but fat chance the government will help you with that -- but it in so doing opens up the machine to facile infection with illicit software which it will then actively cover up and make detectable only to very knowledgable users. If DHS is serious about cyber terrorism, they shouldn't be letting companies subvert the already weak security of the predominant operating system and prime them for becoming unwitting pawns in terrorist activity.
    2. Develop a SafeDupe campaign.

      Make a simple flyer explaining what's happened and the implications and see if local record stores would be amenable to helping out. This could be as little as having them stuff an info packet in their bags, to leaving a stack of Live Linux CDs that do nothing but permit a user to duplicate a CD to CD-R without the offending software, or even have a "SafeDupe" day where a few people setup a table where purchasers can show proof of purchase and bring a blank CD to have it "SafeDuped" for them. Obviously, most record stores won't want to rock the boat, but a well-spoken and sincere person (armed with copies of coverage from the mainstream media talking about the problem) ought to be able to find at least one or two store managers with an ethical streak.

      It's perfectly legal to make such copies, and if you don't believe me, ask a lawyer or download the Bern Convention on Copyright and read it yourself.

    And remember kids, calm, cool, and collected. No name calling, no vitriole. Attribute not malice where stupidty is explanation enough, etc. And do make sure that whatever you do is entirely on the up-and-up, transparent to everyone involved, and that the press and SonyMusic are well informed on the subject.

    1. Re:Boycotts are worthless... by Karzz1 · · Score: 1

      "It's perfectly legal to make such copies, and if you don't believe me, ask a lawyer or download the Bern Convention on Copyright and read it yourself."

      You forgot to qualify your statement. It is perfectly legal as long as the disk does not have copy protection (this last segment brought to you by the letters DMCA). You have every right to make legal backups of your own software/music/movies etc. as long as you do not circumvent any protections in place on the original medium. That is the catch-22 of the DMCA -- you are not breaking any copyright law, but you are in criminal violation of the DMCA.

      Just my 2cents.

      --
      Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
  87. Sony Feedback URL by doublem · · Score: 1

    Sony has a feedback page for their music site here.

    I just sent them to following message:

    I've been following the news about the Root kit being installed by many of your copy protected CDs. I'm disturbed by the fact that, among other things, it allows any application to hide files by adding the text $sys$ to the beginning of a file name. How long before this is used by viruses and spyware to hide from virus scanners.

    I'm also disturbed by the fact that you can't uninstall the DRM software, and that trying to do so renders your CD ROM drive non functional.

    I have no desire to have to reformat my PC and reinstall the operating system from scratch to get rid of what is, to be blunt, a massive security hole.

    I will not be purchasing any Sony label music in the future. This included the purchase of Sony labeled music through iTunes. I was going to get my brother a Playstation 3 this Christmas. I will NOT be doing this. I will also stop buying new games for my existing Playstation 2, and am seriously considering selling the game system and the games I've accumulated.

    I will not purchase Sony products in the future. I have no desire to pay for something that deliberately damages my computer.

    I plan to check my home PC for any signs of this DRM root kit, and if I find it, Sony will be receiving an itemized bill for the time taken to reinstall the operating system and my applications.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  88. Doesn't prevent illegal copying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Even with all the hoops they jump through and all the unethical things that they do, they don't achieve their stated goal: to prevent unlawful copying. One an still make bit-for-bit copies of the CD. One can still play the CD in a CD player, and slurp up the digital output. I'm sure one could make a whole list of ways to create unlawful copies of it.


    Take it back to the store, and say: "The CD is defective. It doesn't do what it says it does. It does not prevent me from making unlawful copies of it."

    1. Re:Doesn't prevent illegal copying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all it is not a CD... it does (probably) not have the CD-logo. Some court (French, I presume) has ruled that if it is not 100% compliant with the CD standard it may not have the CD-logo, allmost none of those CPCD's got a CD-logo because people can have their money back if the disc don't work in their CD player.
      The "Defective disc..." is no good since you are not allowed to even TRY to make a copy of a copy protected disc.

  89. quite the non-sequitur by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    The DMCA is deceptive and vague but yet it still stands. Welcome to law.

    Which has absolutely no bearing on Sony's deceptive business practices, the legality of which can still be questioned in a court of law, as can the interpretation of the DMCA, FYTW.

    Because no one has the time and financial ability to go up against Microsoft, Sony, etc. So, regardless of YOUR opinion on the subject

    First of all, my opinion is irrelevent, as is yours. I didn't realize we were discussing our opinions in the first place. The only opinions that matter as far as the law is concerned is a Judge and/or Jury's.

    you can certainly guarantee that this particular EULA will stand until another fails.

    That simply does not follow. There is no reason to assume this particular EULA will not be tested in court. Why are you making that assumption?

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:quite the non-sequitur by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      That's real nice, Garcia.

      I'm just going to assume it was in fact Garcia, given how quickly it was posted and how quickly he was responding up to that point. If that's not the case, perhaps I'm just proving the AC's point :)

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    2. Re:quite the non-sequitur by garcia · · Score: 1

      That's real nice, Garcia.

      No one ever said I was nice.

      I'm just going to assume it was in fact Garcia, given how quickly it was posted and how quickly he was responding up to that point.

      Sorry to disappoint.

    3. Re:quite the non-sequitur by garcia · · Score: 1

      Which has absolutely no bearing on Sony's deceptive business practices, the legality of which can still be questioned in a court of law, as can the interpretation of the DMCA, FYTW.

      I'll wait for you to foot the legal costs associated with that. I highly doubt that your claimed "deception" will attribute to anything more than "programmer error".

    4. Re:quite the non-sequitur by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Awesome, moron it is then.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    5. Re:quite the non-sequitur by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      I highly doubt that your claimed "deception"

      And I highly doubt that I am the only one who thinks the EULA is intentionally deceptive, so I believe it to be rather disengenuous of you to put it that way.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  90. Sony ...Was Here by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    I used to really like Sony products, but if they keep up with stuff like this, Then I will see them HERE

  91. Never forget... by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "So, technically they are in the clear..."

    In the good ol' USofA, there is no technically clear in civil litigation. All you have to prove is something as simple as your reasonable expectations. Doesn't matter what the EULA says or if they did anything illegal.

    IANAL, but it is my impression that in the eyes of the US courts, you not only have to follow the letter of the law, but you have to ensure that you are conveying a reasonable perception about what your product does. That fine print means nothing if the court finds it too difficult to read, or makes unfair claims (ie - By installing this, you transfer ownership of your computer to us... which is what a rootkit comes closest to without physical possession.)

    Civil cases aren't really about the law. They're about damages, and a propoderance of evidence (more than 50% in your favor... a lot less than the reasonable doubt standard of a criminal trial). It may not be against the law for you to spraypaint your trees pink. But if I'm your neighbor and plan on selling my home, I have every right to sue you for damaging the property value of my home. Getting a few other neighbors to testify, and it'll win just on proponderance of evidence.

    IMHO, I'd sue the hell out of Sony in a class action lawsuit. Look at it this way: you may not win a lot of money each, but it'll probably be enough to repurchase that CD and a few others with no DRM.

    --
    I8-D
    1. Re:Never forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It may not be against the law for you to spraypaint your trees pink. But if I'm your neighbor and plan on selling my home, I have every right to sue you for damaging the property value of my home. Getting a few other neighbors to testify, and it'll win just on proponderance of evidence.

      Fat fucking chance -- you have no right to control my behavior to keep up your property value, unless my behavior violates a law (which doesn't include consideration of your or the neighbors' property value) or is in violation of health codes. Do you believe you can legally force me and my neighbors to paint our houses or trees in a manner acceptable to you so that you can sell at a premium? If you do, you're well and truly fucked and I'll have the judge prove it to you.

    2. Re:Never forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of city ordinances and HOA's? The city and your neighbors can control your behavior in such regards to an extent. Painting your trees pink would definately be something actionable. They can also control your behavior in your house. You cannot runn a brothel, nor a drug lab in your home. In some cities running a business in a residential zone will result in civil action. And the judge usually sides with the plaintiff in these matters.

  92. Technical Issue Feedback form... by pfrCalif · · Score: 2, Informative

    should be filled out by all angry individuals... http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/form8.html

  93. i'm safe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just upgraded to Symantec's Internet Security Suite 2006. Latest, greatest, and safest...

    oh sh...

    "The creator of the copy-protection software, a British company called First 4 Internet, said the cloaking mechanism was not a risk, and that its team worked closely with big antivirus companies such as Symantec to ensure that was the case." -cnet

  94. Lnux version? by frinkacheese · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anybody know if there is a Linux port of this RK? Or will it run on WINE? I would really love to have this RK on my Linux box. I think it's the only thing stopping me from using Linux on the desktop at the moment.

    1. Re:Lnux version? by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Does anybody know if there is a Linux port of this RK? Or will it run on WINE? I would really love to have this RK on my Linux box. I think it's the only thing stopping me from using Linux on the desktop at the moment.

      But there are so many Linux rootkits to choose from! Descisions descisions...

      You think you have it bad? Spare a thought for us poor OpenBSD users!

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  95. Snapshot of old FAQs by TheUnknownCoder · · Score: 1
    --
    Uncopyrightable: The longest word you can write without repeating a letter.
  96. They've seen my last dime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardware: I own two Sony Widescreen TV's one of which weights over 250 lbs., two DVD players, two VHS, one PS2, a Sony VIA laptop and one Multiscan 200ES, a Sony Mp3 car stereo system and I will never purchase any Sony products again.
    Software: I rip every peice of shit software enhancement they give away out of everything I purchase.
    Entertainment: I own a lot of it and will never purchase any Sony product again.
    This is the straw that broke the Camel's back.

  97. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by jistanidiot · · Score: 0

    Are you on crack? Sony has hacked your computer. They've installed software without your knowledge and without any way to detect it. Worse this software will allow anyone who knows about the $sys$ prefix to now install their software without your knowledge.

    This is a huge deal. I hope Sony's execs are put in jail for hacking.

  98. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

    You know, I just thought of something. There's no reason for an operating system to unconditionally trust and run arbitrary binary code from a CD-ROM. And yet that's default behavior on most systems. Autoplay's "run by default" is just as bad as if a web browser runs an executable with no confirmation upon download. So certainly that aspect of Windows is *teh evile* and if any other desktop environment is considering that, they're not helping. Frankly, there's no reason to have an automatic daemon to control device mounting imho, which is why I'm glad that I use an operating system that gives me the choice to mount when I want to. Somehow I doubt this flexibility is coming soon in Windows, given Microsoft's commitment to DRM. (though I often don't place much faith in a user's ability to handle security, I think that most people could handle mounts and unmounts, particularly considering they don't even need it for audio CDs).

  99. Why are you acting so guilty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I copy audio CDs I don't own. I make new audio CDs out of them, or rip them to mp3s or ogg files. THERE IS NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT DOING THIS. Of course, I haven't let myself be brainwashed yet by the DRM police, as you obviously have.

    Copy free or die.

  100. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the funniest thing I've seen lately...Paul Kantner's album, "Blows Against the Empire" was recently re-released on CD. For those of you who are too young to have heard it when it came out around 1970, this album advocated violent overthrow of the US government, theft of government property, active draft resistance, drug use, and other assorted bits of anarchy. On the cover of the jewel box, and on the CD itself, it now has large FBI anti-piracy warnings, threatening you with government prosecution for attempting to pirate this album...ironic, nicht wahr?

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  101. Ah, so it hides in the registry? by Solandri · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess that should've been obvious, but... Since it's modifying the registry, any security app that warns you of registry changes (like SpyBot's TeaTimer) should pop up a warning and give you the option to prevent this from installing itself in the first place.

    1. Re:Ah, so it hides in the registry? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      You just allowed to install an innocuous media player, sure it wants to write in the registry! Why would anyone disable it. On the other hand, everyone should disable autorun, and look for executables on a sound cd only when they cannot play the tracks by conventional methods. (wmp, winamp etc).

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  102. No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by Kadoo · · Score: 1

    On Sony's website I looked at the CD in question. At no point does the website tell you there is copy protection on the CD.

    So Johnny Uninformed buys a the CD online. He will have no idea he is recieving a DRMed CD until after he pays shipping and recieves the product.

    This would piss me off!! I have had this happen to me in the store though as well. I have bought CD's only to realize it was DRMed once I got home. !@#$ this piece of $#@!

    I have two solutions 1) return it 2) use my sony CD player with optical output and record it to my sony minidisc in high quality. Transfer the recording to my sony computer where I share it with the world to download in high quality DRM free greatness.

    #2 is hypothetical but possible. I like the idea of screwing sony with sony products but then you'd actually have to buy sony products and they win anyway! By the way the minidisc would only allow you to transfer that recording off the minidisc once. Way to restrict my personal use with every product you make.

    If Sony made prosthetics would they restrict how I used my limbs?

    1. Re:No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      This just reminds me of that article about the now-President of Sony reprimanding the people at Sony BGM for being to greedy, and essentially handing the digital music player revolution to Apple because they thought it might encourage piracy. In fact, it reminds me of all of the business surrounding PSP hacking. They're just overly loss-averse. Something about their corporate mentality prevents them from seeing that while they might lose a couple million bucks in CD revenue, they'll get billions upon billions in luxury mp3 players, or likewise why they might lose a little bit of their game revenue, but gain by having tons of enthusiasts such as myself purchasing PSPs. I won't, because of all the tomfoolery they're pulling. Of course, that's the problem when your company has many cthulhu-like tentacles stretched out into a variety of areas, each thinking and acting like an independent company. Nobody sees the big picture.

      Well, what can I say but "Ha-ha."

    2. Re:No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by lgw · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm certainly not buying another Sony produt for as long as I remember this BS. Not that their products are very good in the first place, these days, but this will make it easier to choose my next TV.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by murr · · Score: 1

      If Sony made prosthetics would they restrict how I used my limbs?

      Not only that, but they'd probably restrict how you used your non-prosthetic limb, too.

      Furthermore, they would of course cost an arm and a leg...

    4. Re:No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      Yeah. They're getting slapped all over the place by Apple. My next 'tv' is going to be a 30" cinema display with a tuner hooked up to the computer. I'LL NEVER NEED TO LOOK AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER AGAIN!

    5. Re:No Mention of Copy Protection on Sony Site by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Heh, it's a very nice monitor, but Google says a Sony 32" flatscreen is $400-$550 and Apple's 30" is $2500. But, if you need a large monitor anyway then just put the thing on a wall-mounted arm. Just swing it so you can see the monitor from the TV and use a Bluetooth remote.

      Oh, and my employer is employed by Apple in a marketing or advertising capacity.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  103. Just when you thought it was safe... by toy4two · · Score: 1

    Just when you thought it was safe to return to the music store.

    Guess its back to downloading DRM free MP3s...

  104. I can't believe I'm actually replying to this but. by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

    If you think about it a tumbler lock is most certainly an analog device. Each pin is not "On or Off," if it was I could see your point. Each pin has a range from the minimum height to the maximum height. Also tolerances in the system allow for a match without an exact match.

    How do you figure it's digital?

    Now an electronic keypad would be digital but you specifically mentioned a tumbler lock.

  105. Sony in violation of DMCA? by softcoder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If SONY circumvents the security I have installed on MY machine with their rootkit are THEY in violation of the DMCA?

    1. Re:Sony in violation of DMCA? by jgoemat · · Score: 1

      If your security is to protect copyrighted content that you own, and Sony is using their rootkit to bypass that security to access your copyrighted content, then I would say yes. I am not a lawyer however, and those are big ifs.

  106. Mmm... by ledow · · Score: 1

    Hold on...

    If you have Windows and you really need to play the CD's (not that I suspect many casual users would even think of using the CD drive in the computer - most people I work with don't know you can even do it. I've even been asked if I can play a CD in a DVD drive and, incidentally, vice versa) ripping them to MP3 is suddenly safer, easier and, taking the users time into account, cheaper. Plus you don't need the disk in the drive. Good move, record companies the world over. You've just signed your own bankruptcy.

    To those tech-savvy people who want to play their CD's in their computers, why have you got Autorun enabled, why do you treat the onboard media playing software as any different to any other software (virus risk etc.) and why would you allow someone to install ANYTHING, no matter how tiny, onto your hard disk just to play a CD on the computer?

    CD's play in the computer as a by-product of the technology. Most of the time, data and audio CD's never mix so if it's been this difficult for the past few years to play a god-damn audio CD in your computer, who still bothers?

    You want to play a CD on a computer, keep autorun turned off (it only saves two double-clicks at great security expense) or alternatively hold down Shift as you load the drive, rip it to MP3 and never use the "software" that comes with it. If you wanna play it on your CD players, make audio-disc copies (you just did it to MP3 so dragging those MP3's onto Nero takes about a minute and you have a completely DRM-free audio copy for the car, safe use on the computer and a backup should your CD ever stop working (breakages, can't play it in Windows Vista etc.). Most decent MP3 software completely bypasses this sort of thing so long as the disk doesn't get a chance to Autorun or be installed.

    It probably never hits about 70% of the CD-playing public as they never put it in their computer. It shouldn't ever hit anybody clever enough not to install unchecked software. The middle ground (those who want to make a copy with some piece of rubbish written in Visual Basic or those who want to play it on their computer) are a small minority.

    1. Re:Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been against autorun since it was introduced. Remember CD players without auto insert notification? They were pushed out of the market nearly instantly.
      why have you got Autorun enabled
      Because, for the last 6 years, every piece of CD burning software on Windows has explicitly required it.

      For what good reason? Who knows...
    2. Re:Mmm... by smash · · Score: 1
      Ermm...

      Let's not forget who is at fault here.

      The user, who purchased their computer with the ability to (or perhaps, for the purpose of) playing media, who also BUYS the CD in good faith - from a reputable company no less, or Sony/first4internet who are pushing the boundaries of the law and knobbling it?

      If this was "freeware" or freely distributed, it would be called a trojan horse...

      I think you're being a bit anal here - 99% (to pull a random but likely close figure) of the CD buying public, particularly those who would rip it to MP3/WMV/whatever will have autorun turned on, on their home PC, and will quite rightfully expect their CD drive to play CDs without owning their machine.

      This software has not been detected as a virus by any of the AV software out there (to my knowlege) so blaming the user for not taking virus precautions is a bit weak.

      And no, personally I'd never install player software for a DRM protected CD. But that doesn't mean that someone is an idiot for simply attempting to legally and quite reasonably *PLAY* the media they have purchased with their media-playing equipment.

      Also, I *do* leave autorun turned on in Windows (when I use it), simply because it doesn't update the view of what CD is in your computer reliably (in my computer) without it.

      I think you'll find that with the popularity of media-PCs, those who occasionally/regularly play CDs in their PC will outnumber those who don't...

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  107. I can imagine the dialogue now... by MMaestro · · Score: 0

    "Sony customer support. You want to uninstall our DRM software? Ok, whats your name? Address? City and state? Zip? Ok, please wait while we submit your information to local law enforcement."

  108. Evercrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, are they placing DRM rootkits on the SOE game disk ?

  109. And transistors aren't on or off either by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't know what the voltages are now, but used to be anything below, say, 0.5 was off, anything above 4.5 was on, anything in between was a no-no.

    Sure sounds like lock tumblers have a lot in common with transistors.

    1. Re:And transistors aren't on or off either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transistors are used in analog circuits as well as in digital ones.

      Transistor does not imply digital.

    2. Re:And transistors aren't on or off either by Daytona955i · · Score: 1

      Right, transistors themselves are analog but they can be used to make an analog signal digital. (as you have explained in your post)

      So I agree with you, lock tumblers do have a lot in common with transistors. Except transistors are analog devices. In this case, the digital result of the tumbler would be locked vs. unlocked. Those are the two states that a lock can be in. However using a key to achieve that state, you engage in an analog act.

      The original poster however said that the pins in the tumbler were digital and I argue this fact just like I would argue the fact that a transistor is digital.

  110. Let's just email the president... by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    Quit goofing around with all this chat. Here's the email address of Sony's president, Nobuyuki Idei, Chairman and Chief Executive: nobuyuki.idei@jp.sony.com Let's just ask him what he's going to do about it.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  111. Nah by HunterZ · · Score: 1

    I don't know why this /. article was posted, as I doubt any of the links add anything to the original. What would be nice is to hear a statement from Sony, who are probably trying to figure out how to damage-control the situation now that their dirty little secret is all over the Internet.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  112. If Slashdot can do it, why can't we? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    If Slashdot can link to a chain of previous articles on the same subject (not that I don't mind seeing Sony flogged over this for a second day), shouldn't we all be linking to our postings in the original article as well?

    For example, there's this and this for starters.

    Shouldn't they be providing a tool to make this easy for their posters?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  113. admin priviliges? by rilister · · Score: 1

    Since I believe everything I read on Slashdot, my primary login in XP has always only had User privileges. Given how thoroughly this thing appears to insinuate itself into the system, would that have defeated its attempts to install?

    Is that an adequate defense against this kind of sabotage? Or should I just admit that running as User has been nothing but a pain in the butt?

    --
    'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
  114. Re:Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a bad idea at all, that one!

  115. Re:Reminds me of something I did by manarth · · Score: 1

    not gonna work.

    the whole point of a rootkit is that it wriggles so deep into the system that it can hide from 'show hidden files and folders', as well as hiding entries from regedit.

    do you really believe that a regular 'hidden' folder would be undetectable by AV scanners?

    --
  116. 1%-2% CPU by pcve · · Score: 1

    I gess Sony will refund people for the lost CPU cycles.

  117. One nasty idea by jonr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Buy and return.
    Buy something from Sony, like PS2 or a camera, and then return it the day after. AFAIK, return items go pretty high up in the supply chain. Tell why you are returning it.
    Any problems with this?

    1. Re:One nasty idea by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      and, when they don't take the opened return, complain using the EULA, stating that you don't agree to the terms.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:One nasty idea by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Get a throwaway computer.

      Buy several CDs from them.
      INstall the rootkit, then call their customer support number to ask to remove it. Be very patient, slow, play dumb, but be persistent. Use up those toll free minutes. Ask to talk to supervisors if they give you trouble. :)

    3. Re:One nasty idea by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Problem is that also uses your time, which is hopefully worth more than a phone monkeys.

  118. iTunes Does the Same Thing by cmd · · Score: 1, Informative

    Apple's iTunes installs new CDROM drivers in the same way. I believe Apple was doing this before Sony.

    1. Re:iTunes Does the Same Thing by Software · · Score: 1

      It's only the same thing if iTunes can't be easily uninstalled and if the DRM software hooks into the OS so that it can't be removed. I don't think that either of these are true (I don't have iTunes installed, so I can't tell).

    2. Re:iTunes Does the Same Thing by cmd · · Score: 1

      When I installed iTunes (a year ago?) it hooked into the CDROM device driver chain, installing drivers in the system32/drivers directory. This was done to enforce Apple's DRM business rules when writing iTunes files to a writable CD. This caused problems on my computer by conflicting with another company's similar draconian DRM solution, which is why I investigated and found what iTunes was doing. Uninstalling iTunes left the drivers in place and I had to remove them manually.

      So yes, it is doing the same thing. At least it was then, it may have changed since but most likely not.

      I later talked to the engineer at Apple who was responsible for implementing those drivers, so I have quite a bit of insight into the how and why.

  119. Functions as normal audio CD on Macs by Cadre · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What happens if a Mac user puts one of these crap Sony disks into their computer?

    Nothing. It looks and functions as a normal audio CD on a Mac.

    Does the Sony DRM prevent Windows users who legally buy their CDs from playing the songs in their iPod?

    Under Windows, yes it will prevent iTunes from ripping it and putting the music on your iPod. Several bands (and I believe even Sony) have instructions for copying music onto the iPod using Windows and they generally involve burning the included WMA files of the music on a regular CD and then reripping it (yes you will lose quality), but the much better solution (that they don't tell you about) is to just hold down the shift key while inserting the CD which will disable the autorun.bat script.

    It's actually rather funny looking at their instructions because they'll have several pages of instructions for Windows machines to copy the music onto iPods and for the Mac, they just say "The audio CD will function normally and without restrictions on a Mac.".

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
  120. Re: Pretty easy to boycott Sony by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I havn't bought a Sony product since 2001 when they were grossly rude to me during a customer service related call.

    So yes, it's very easy to boycott sony.

    Hmm. I guess except movies- I may have seen a columbia picture at the theatres. I know for some I have bought a ticket to movie "B" and then seen movie "A" instead to avoid them getting my cash.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  121. Here's the address of the guy to write to at Sony: by trudyscousin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mr. Thomas Hesse
    President, Global Digital Business
    Sony BMG Music Entertainment Company
    550 Madison Ave.
    New York, NY 10022-3211

    I wrote this guy last summer after reading a piece in the New York Times featuring him discussing Sony's oh-so-wunnerful SunnComm copy protection. I can't locate the original NYT article, but this one says almost exactly the same thing.

    I didn't receive a reply. I thought I stood a good chance of receiving one since I couched my language in civil terms and didn't call him a pig fucker. So, see what works for you.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
  122. Now on Google News by prof_tc · · Score: 1

    As of 11:50ish, a set of stories about this topic are now on google news. The ones I read cast it in the light of interfering with computer operation, and being potentially dangerous.

  123. A hypothetical story... by nothingx · · Score: 1

    A hospital in Somewhere, USA uses XYZ Software's Medical Manager suite. This application runs on a Windows based network. One of the internal databases is called $sys$PatientAllergies which keeps track of which patients are allergic to certain medicines. A patient, John Doe, is admitted for having potentially serious illness. Mr. Doe is highly allergic to medicine XXX and tells the nurse he could die if used on him. Sometime after the nurse enters this information into the Medical Manager, she plays her new copy of Sony's latest release with said DRM technology. A short while later Mr. Doe takes a turn for the worst becomes unconcious. Only two medicines can save him, medicine XXX and a less effective alternative. The doctor on hand checks the Medical Manager suite for any allergies Mr. Doe might have and sees that there are none because Sony's root kit has silently hidden Medical Manager's $sys$PatientAllergies database. Mr. Doe is given medicine XXX and dies within minutes.

    Is protecting your copyright worth killing for?

  124. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using Studio.Net full-time ever since it was in beta. I haven't had a bluescreen in years. I think your issues lie elsewhere.

  125. Call to anti-virus makers by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is reported everywhere as a rootkit, something that can't be uninstalled, and that may compromise your system. It is, in fact, a virus. Personally I hope anti-virus software will start detecting it, reporting it as virus to the user ("Sony DRM virus found!") and remove it.

  126. Re:Here's the address of the guy to write to at So by mihalis · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, I mentioned this article to my wife who actually works for Sony-BMG right there at HQ on 550 Madison, and even she didn't reply to me. no kidding!

  127. Nice.... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    We might also want to notifiy companies that Sony's Music CDs infect Windows machines if played, and that they should immediatly notify their employees that it is against company policy to play Sony CDs in any company computer.

    1. Re:Nice.... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Already did, I emailed all the companies I contract for and stated that Audio CD's should no longer be used in company computers, and also stated why.

      Funny thing is, a few users emailed me back and asked if cds they burnt themselves would have this issue... I stated they should not, but that you should not use cds burnt at home on work computers, but on there home computers it would be just fine.

      I dont think this is the reaction sony would want from this.

  128. Sony: Arrrh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry! Hijacking a person's computer on the flimsiest excuse is nothing short of piracy! Down with software pirates!

  129. but Sony says it's not malware by cab15625 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    To quote the faq from Sony

    6. I have heard that the protection software is really malware/spyware. Could this be true?

    Of course not. The protection software simply acts to prevent unlimited copying and ripping from discs featuring this protection solution. It is otherwise inactive. The software does not collect any personal information nor is it designed to be intrusive to your computer system.

    Also, the protection components are never installed without the consumer first accepting the End User License Agreement.

    If at some point you wish to remove the software from your machine simply contact customer service through this link. You will, though, be unable to use the disc on your computer once you uninstall the components.

    I call shenanigans. They say it's not designed to be intrusive, yet it hides itself by creating a security hole and it messes with your drivers. They say it's not installed without the consent of the user to the EULA yet the EULA doesn't appear to give sufficient details to make an informed choice as to whether or not you want this on your system. They offer a removal tool; however, once applied, you will not be able to use the CD in your system at all. This last implies that the tool either does an incomplete removal or adds further software to your system (does the removal tool come with an EULA?)

  130. Let us /. Sony by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    Come on guys, this one is obvious

    Sony's Form
    A real live person will call you back Amazon titles with the protection
    I'll refer you specifically to Velvet Revolver's new cd
    Because the 1st user review goes on to explain that DRM sucks and gives directions for removing it.

    Here's your chance to get a live Sony rep to call so that you can voice your displeasure, waste their time and generally jerk them around as long as they'll stay on the line. This is one of those moments where I wish TrollKore and The GNAA were still around. Those trolls would eat Sony alive. I don't know how, but I'm sure they'd manage to give Sony the verbal version of Goatse.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Let us /. Sony by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The copy protection on the Velvet Revolver album was a lot less insidious than their new system.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:Let us /. Sony by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      "This is one of those moments where I wish TrollKore and The GNAA were still around."

      I'm not sure what Trollkore is but the GNAA is still around - http://www.gnaa.us/.

      Maybe we could help them out and hack Sony's homepage so it's something like goatse - I'm sure consumers would LOVE that :) - "Hey, I think I'm gonna buy the new Velvet Revolver CD. Let's see. . . www.sony.com aaaaand...... WHOOOooooah that is NOT what I wanted!"

  131. Or buy 2nd hand by fyoder · · Score: 1
    Or if you have to have something on a Sony label, buy it 2nd hand so they don't profit. It's not as positive as buying from an indy label, but it does meet the ethical minimum of 'do no evil'.

    And if you haven't already, check out magnatune . Their motto: "We're a record label. But we're not evil." Too bad Sony can't say the same.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  132. Drudge by zogger · · Score: 1

    Matt monitors slashdot, he'll see it, so there's another avenue that gets read by a host of political and law types in DC.

    And just in case he missed it, I will now send in a "tip" on his form box.

  133. Re:I can't believe I'm actually replying to this b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's digital because you use your digits (fingers) to operate it... that what I'm guessing anyway.

  134. Discompile and USE it! by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually, that gives me a great idea. A lot of newer anti-copying programs, anti-cracks, etc try to detect running apps (such as programs used to mount ISO images, etc) that could allow copying. Why not remake the crack too allow the ISO-mounters to work... it woul be incredibly ironic if Sony's attempt to enforce draconian protection produced a new and wonderful way to avoid other protection(s).

  135. "Lakshya" Sony CD, do I have a rootkit now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine played his music CD on my laptop earlier this summer. It's title was "Lakshya" (soundtrack from an Indian movie) and while he was listening to the CD, I noticed on the CD cover a quite tiny print saying that the CD was copy protected. I wonder if my XP Pro has a rootkit in it now? How to find out if the copy protection did not install some other software on my computer?

    1. Re:"Lakshya" Sony CD, do I have a rootkit now? by shams42 · · Score: 1

      Get the Rootkit Reveal program from www.sysinternals.com

  136. Re:Disable Autoplay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I checked windows had a way to disable autoplay on cds..

  137. Find a new fiancee... by gg3po · · Score: 1

    ...it may seem harsh and difficult, but you *can* do better. Despite /. stereotypes, there really are more fish in the sea. I've been happily married for 6+ years, now. It's not perfect, but we generally reach understandings. My wife does take much interest in social issues and we frequently enjoy engaging in thoughtful discussions on such matters. You deserve someone who will stick to ideals that are more compatible with your own. Your marriage will be better (probably last longer) and you will be happier if you wait for someone that does. I'm sure she's nice and all, maybe very pretty (looks aren't everything -- many so-called "average-looking" women are actually better in bed), but one of the greatest problems facing our society is intelligent people of principle, like yourself, degrading themselves by reproducing with apathetic ignorami like your fiancee. I'm not trying to be rude, just give you some advice. Sometimes the truth hurts. Some more advice: Marry foreign. I've found that non-USian women are generally more principled, intelligent, reasonable, less materialistic, and even better in bed. American women can keep their apathetic and unjustifiable "men-can-do-no-right--women-can-do-no-wrong" attitudes, but they need to learn that they will lose their men if they choose to do so. </rant>

    --
    ---
    1. Re:Find a new fiancee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think your outlook on IP and CD's is at all important in a relationship. Far more important are how you think about money, religion, family, raising children. What doesn't matter is what you're interested in. I have tried dating women who do math/science/computers and it is absolutely unbearable. Give me an art/humanities major any day. What matters is that you have fun together, not whether or not she cares about the RIAA. I can't believe people like you exist.

    2. Re:Find a new fiancee... by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      Occasionally, people who major in art or humanities care about social justice issues too, would you believe...

      -- Jamie

    3. Re:Find a new fiancee... by gg3po · · Score: 1
      What matters is that you have fun together, not whether or not she cares about the RIAA. I can't believe people like you exist.

      I stand by my previous assertion: There are more fish in the sea. If you look hard enough, you will find any number of women that you can have fun with *and* <gasp> share common interests with. They do exist. Don't give up so quickly. Keep looking.

      --
      ---
  138. Tumblers are digital by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    A lock tumbler is either positioned correctly or it isn't. "Correctly" means with a certain distance, and that does not make it analog. If a tumber could be half open, or 3/4 open, or .2464 open, then it would be analog.

    Mechanical does not imply analog.

    There are physical digital computers, made from fluids, gears, many things. Physical does not imply analog either, or physical circuits would make all computers analog.

    Are you next going to say pregnancy is analog?

    1. Re:Tumblers are digital by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the assist there, exactly what I was driving at. Compare "Voltage relative to turn-on" in a transistor with "Height relative to shear line" in a tumbler and you'd think the analogy would be pretty clear, but oh well...

  139. I have a complain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...those CD's do not autostart on my computer and the only thing I can see is something like this :
    Directory listning of d:\
    Track00.wav
    Track01.wav
    Track02.wav
    ...
    T rack16.wav
    C:\>
    Is somethig wrong with my PC ??

  140. Avoid buying CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best solution is obviously to avoid buying CDs. I am just thankful now that I stopped funding the record companies attacks on consumers back in 1998. Haven't bought a single CD since then, and never again will until DRM is gone, and a public apology is forthcoming for this abysmal behaviour. I believe in the right to make as unlimited copies of material I have purchased, the right to edit it, reencode it, and use it for whatever personal purposes I desire. I have no intention of paying for content that is governed by the unacceptable conditions that record companies impose. Record companies should not have the right to prevent me from converting content that I have purchased to whatever format I find suitable, and recording it to any media that I choose. If they insist on such a right, they and their products are of no use to me.
    The greed of these people is sickening. They are damaging themselves far more than limited piracy ever would. People are willing to pay for the ease of simple downloads, providing the price is fixed, and reasonable (eg. $0.10 / track or less). Anything else is greedy and unacceptable.

  141. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

    ...you'll need to contact your IT department to have them install the software for you.

    ROTFL! That has to be a joke. No competent IT department would install shit like this, even if it wasn't malicious.

  142. How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you remove it? Please explain.

  143. what about this.... by parseexception · · Score: 1

    its a misdemeanor but maybe...
    S 115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree. A person is guilty of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree when, believing it probable that he is rendering aid: 1. to a person who intends to commit a crime, he engages in conduct which provides such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aids such person to commit a felony; or 2. to a person under sixteen years of age who intends to engage in conduct which would constitute a crime, he, being over eighteen years of age, engages in conduct which provides such person with means or opportunity for the commission thereof and which in fact aids such person to commit a crime. Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree is a class A misdemeanor.

    --
    Yeah, I saw a yard gnome once, it didn't scare me - Space Ghost
  144. Protect yourself: Disable CD-ROM autorun feature by magictongue · · Score: 1
    To protect yourself it is best to disable the Win CD-ROM autorun feature. To enable or disable automatically running CD-ROMs, you must edit the registry:

    1. Click Start, click Run, type regedit in the Open box, and then press ENTER.

    2. Locate and click the following registry key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Servic es\CDRom

    3. To disable automatically running CD-ROMs, change the Autorun value to 0 (zero). To enable automatically running CD-ROMs, change the Autorun value to 1.

    4. Restart your computer.

  145. moderation by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    That moderation on the parent comment was truly and without a doubt, necessary.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  146. Let's not be forgetting... by samj · · Score: 1

    who bought us AutoPlay in the first place. Surely this sort of abuse was concievable back then...

    1. Re:Let's not be forgetting... by eric76 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what happens if you just disable autoplay. Does it let you have regular access to the CD?

    2. Re:Let's not be forgetting... by LarsG · · Score: 1

      I was wondering what happens if you just disable autoplay. Does it let you have regular access to the CD?

      Don't have the CD so I can't verify it.

      However, if the description of how the DRM works is correct then it is a dual session CD (blue book? CD Plus?). The first session is a standard redbook audio CD, while the second session is a data session. The entire protection depends on the DRM software on the data session being installed. If you disable autorun you should be able to rip the redbook portion just as you can with any regular audio CD.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  147. Deceptive wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wording suggests that the software can be deleted, and this si what a user would expect. Additionally, the wording implies that the protection is for this particular CD, whereas the software in fact also scans any other CD used. Given that scanning CDs is a service, this is clearly a case of "obtaining services by deception" - the legal wording for fraud.

  148. Sony Releases "Fix" by tmassa99 · · Score: 1

    http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/updates.html

    SOFTWARE UPDATES/ PLUG-INS

    November 2, 2005 - This Service Pack removes the cloaking technology component that has been recently discussed in a number of articles published regarding the XCP Technology used on SONY BMG content protected CDs. This component is not malicious and does not compromise security. However to alleviate any concerns that users may have about the program posing potential security vulnerabilities, this update has been released to enable users to remove this component from their computers.

    http://updates.xcp-aurora.com/

    1. Re:Sony Releases "Fix" by doublem · · Score: 1

      Funny, I didn't see anything there about them no longer including it on the CDs in the first place.

      And of course the uninstaller is IE only.

      Guess I'll have to maintain that "No Sony ANYTHING" stance.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    2. Re:Sony Releases "Fix" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

      What makes Sony think anyone is going to trust them with any new program that *claims* to do something? They've violated consumer trust -- badly violated it -- by behaving only slightly better than typical malware/spyware. Permanently altering my computer -- even when I'm not playing the relevant disc -- is bad enough, but hiding that fact and not even offering a way to uninstall it completely is dispicable. Why does that software have to be there, sucking up CPU and memory, if the disc isn't even there?

      I'm sorry, but I'm not sympathetic to their token attempt at reconciliation, and I hope people continue to rake them over the coals for what they have done. Making the software non-stealthy does not solve the root of the problem.

      I won't buy another Sony artist's disc unless it clearly says it is a plain, old-fashioned, Red Book CD-ROM. I now know what "Enhanced / protected content" really means: screw the paying consumer.

  149. does it come preinstalled on VAIOs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is Sony preinstalling this software on new VAIOs?

  150. raise the stakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    telling Sony you aren't going to buy $10 CDs won't get their attention but how about "because of your unethical/arguably illegal tactics I will also be buying:

    1. a $4K DLP Samsung instead of a LCOS Sony
    2. a $1K Mini-DV camcorder from anyone else instead of MicroMV Sony
    3. a $400 X360 (+software) instead of a PS/3

    etc."

    as luck would have it I already did all three (well, Xbox vs. PS/2 for now) but unless/until they discontinue this practice AND publicly acknowlege/apologize the Sony brand is off my list for all big-ticket purchases (which I, as I suspect several ./-ers do, make quite a few). and to think I thought I was "going over to the dark side" getting an xbox (better HD support)...

  151. Re:Sure Sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..there is something about women ...like being from Mars ....and not caring about what is installed for/on them ..and population issues

    Dont generalise!

  152. Are stores liable if they sell you these CDs by emm-tee · · Score: 1

    It seems that a CD employing this technology could potentially damage your system. For example the Washington Post article reports that it breaks Windows Vista 'spectacularly'.

    If a store was aware of the possibility that the CD could cause damage, but still sold you the CD, would the store then be complicit in any subsequent damage that occured to your system?

    Would it be wise for stores withdraw these CDs from sale in case they do cause damage, to avoid possible future legal action?

    Could someone with a knowledge of the legal issues comment on this?

  153. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by lgw · · Score: 1

    competent IT department

    I understand each of those words seperately, but they don't make any sense to me in that order. You suggest a weird concept.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  154. Secunia has listed this bug... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    Sony CD First4Internet XCP DRM Software Security Issue
    ...with a simple solution : Use another product.

  155. Re:Dupe(s): with a purpose. by lgw · · Score: 1

    Riiiight, because corporate execs don't have enough power to abuse sharehlders and employees as it is, we need this? Throw the execs in jail; don't punish some guy on a manufacturing floor who puts Sony CRTs together, or someone who owns Sony through a mutual fund without even realizing it.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  156. Sony update by dtobias · · Score: 1

    In apparent response to all this fuss, Sony has released an update that "removes the cloaking technology component that has been recently discussed in a number of articles published regarding the XCP Technology used on SONY BMG content protected CDs." However, an attempt to access the link to this update using my preferred browser (Mozilla Suite) resulted in the message "Sorry, your Internet Browser does not support ActiveX Controls. Please use Microsoft Internet Explorer to continue."

    --
    --Dan
    Web Tips
  157. Business Case by SpecBear · · Score: 1
    I'm no expert on such things, but doesn't it seem like nobody at Sony even did the most cursory analysis of the costs and benefits of implementing this feature? Let's assume for a moment that they weren't aware of the damage that could be caused by thsi software. Here's my quick "let's pull some bullet points out of my ass" evaluation of this.

    Costs:
    • Licensing or purchasing the DRM software
    • Running a support line for handling uninstall requests. I'm betting that a single call to this line wipes out the profit gained from selling several CDs
    • Various indirect costs through bad press, annoyed users, and loss of future business. This software will convert a certain number of paying customers into pirates not just out of anger, frustration, or revenge, but because black market music is safer
    Benefits:
    • People who buy the CD can't make copies easily.

    Unless the damage done by casual pirates is greater than the cost of implementing this DRM scheme, it's a stupid idea.
    The RIAA is notorious for releasing inflated numbers about the cost of piracy, but actions like Sony's seem to indicate that the member companies actually believe that these losses are real. I can't think of any other reason why a company would expend so much to plug what seems to be a tiny hole. Maybe they're thinking that if you can't rip the CD, you'll buy the song again from an online service.
  158. Complain by It's+Pat · · Score: 0

    Yes, I've heard the suggestions that you should complain to the artists on Sony's label. But I think that Sony needs to hear as well. Complain to SonyMusic: http://www.sonymusic.com/about/feedback.cgi/

  159. My perspective by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Sony clearly steps across the line here, and I seriously hope (though IANAL) that courts would find them liable here.

    First the rootkit contains files which attempt to hide themselves from ordinary detection measures. Secondly, it deliberately compromises system security.

    If the EULA argument holds up, I can hack into anyone's system or network by sending out email attachments that require the user to click on a EULA and give me unlimited access to their computer. I mean, there is a reasonable limit to what one can be expected to agree to, and what a reasonable interpretation of a balanced contract can be.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  160. Should this be removed from Windows? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    First I would be curious to know why Windows supports hiding of files in such a way? Secondly would it be better for everyone if this sort of file hiding was removed from windows all together?

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Should this be removed from Windows? by smash · · Score: 1
      The answer is: it doesn't.

      That functionality has been added by the rootkit.

      smash.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    2. Re:Should this be removed from Windows? by eric76 · · Score: 1

      Then they'll just hide it in an alternate stream somewhere.

    3. Re:Should this be removed from Windows? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Then they'll just hide it in an alternate stream somewhere.

      They could, but I am surprised the OS allows this sort of behaviour. Do any Unix based systems allow something similar?

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  161. Take action to stop Sony from cont this outrage by Rasta_the_far_Ian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Express your outrage in a letter to Sony Investor Services contact. State that you will no longer purchase Sony products, and will be very leery of Sony as an investment in your retirement plans due to this clear demonstration of Sony's lack of ethics in its business practices. Physical letters work best. The address, from Sony's 2005 Annual Report, is:

    Sony Corporation of America
    Investor Relations
    550 Madison Ave, 27th Floor
    New York, NY 10022-3211

    If you want a laugh, check out Sony's views on Corporate Social Responsibility site at http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/Environment/about/ind ex.html

    From that site: "The Sony Group recognizes that ... Sound business practices require that business decisions give due consideration to the interests of Sony stakeholders,including shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, business partners, local communities and other organizations."

    I wonder how they think installing rootkits on customer computers promotes the interests of Sony's customers!!!

  162. Bit Torrent by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    Someone should rip the audio files and put them on Bit Torrent, this way no one else will have to deal with that sony sh!t. Its pretty obvious that the governement is more concerned with protecting these big companies that its citizens, and if no one fights back, they will just keep pulling this crap, or worse.

    --
    Scott Swezey
    1. Re:Bit Torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh twitboy, condoning piracy DOESN'T help, ya idjit. BOYCOTT Sony, THAT'll hurt them, and to also make the boycott effective, DON'T pirate their music. Fuck bit torrent and p2p. Buy your music, or shut the fuck up.

  163. Game DRM by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    What really confuses me is that in many games, they release with SafeDisc or something similar, but usually the first patch removes it. On one hand, it could be a canny marketing move (all, an attempted one...) to raise goodwill by having these companies remove restrictions along with an idea that it's the early releases that are most prone to pirating (you know, outside of that almost all of them are released in cracked versions before the release date). On the other hand, it could be that the publishing companies require the DRM and then the developers, who could care less, see nothing wrong with disabling it "for performance reasons."

    For the record, off of the top of my head, Morrowind released with SafeDisc protection which was disabled via patch. The Sims 2 released with a restriction against running Daemon Tools, but had a workaround on their tech support site. I'm sure there have been others.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Game DRM by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      In most cases, it's neither; it's just to attempt to reduce the mass-piracy at the game's release. People are more likely to want to warez Best Game Ever #4553 at its release (since it's a must-have big new thing) than a couple of months down the line, and if the copy protection is strong enough to stop the casual piracy, they'll either make a sale or lose a pirate. Once the huge rush has died down, and cracks have been produced, the only people it annoys are legit customers.

  164. Uninstall? Good luck. by NadaTech · · Score: 0

    I called Sony to inquire about how to remove this "rootkit". As I expected, I was transferred several times. After 40 min. of transfering, being on hold and explaining the situation, I did not get an answer. Can someone post the removal instructions here on Slashdot, or point to a place that has them? Thanks.

  165. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Nethead · · Score: 1

    10GHz: you got a license to operate at 10GHz?

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  166. Unfortunatly, you made the problem worse. by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By, saying that all audio CDs should not be played, you took the heat off of Sony. You basically told them that audio CDs are inherently a problem. This would lead to the belief that the problem is not Sony's. You also punished the employee. If companies follow your advice, employees that want a little music through the day will now be denied the use of any CDs. You should make sure that you highlight that SONY is the problem, and that they have software on their CDs that infect computers with DRM.

  167. Re:Here's the address of the guy to write to at So by mattsucks · · Score: 1

    you are SO sleeping on the couch tonight...

  168. Well, it's like this. by randolph · · Score: 1

    "All your CD players are belonging to us?"

  169. Re:I don't understand the fuss. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Just hitting ctrl+alt+del and actively watching your performance monitor uses up to 3% of your CPU. Just FYI, so even without the player running, I wouldn't be able to tell to begin with, nor would most. And.. I thought the original article originally said 5-10% of your CPU?

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  170. There you're wrong by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1

    If your use is impaired (especially if you have costs to recover) you've been damaged. Consuming large amounts of CPU, impairing the operation of peripherals and requiring time and/or expertise to return the computer to its original state is damage.

  171. I'll take text files over the registry any day... by argent · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... you think clicky-clicky is easier than editing text files?

    Don't even compare Windows and Linux. Just compare Windows-with-registry with Windows-with-INI-files. Use the command line tools available *on* Windows. It's a hell of a lot easier to find stuff in AUTOEXEC.BAT, CONFIG.SYS, and WINDOWS\*.INI than to find it in the registry.

    Now try it again with UNIX tools, which are designed for such work.

    Of course, once you've done that, and you've created an automated GUI tool for doing the job, it's about as easy to do it in either environment... and there's more people writing those tools on Windows because there's more people USING Windows and more need for those kinds of tools.

    But, damn, that's not Windows versus UNIX, that's F-Secure versus FSF.

  172. Who says you have to agree to the EULA? by argent · · Score: 1

    It's legal to rip the CD with other tools without agreeing to the EULA (you have to if you're not running Windows), so don't agree to the EULA in the first place.

  173. Amazon chose not to print a review revealing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,
    I wrote a review of the discs for amazon.co.uk. Look for 'Get Right with the Man' in their Uk store. I explained the issues about the copy protection. Unlike amazon.com which flags the CD as copy protected, the UK site doesn't mention this at all.
    Perhaps unsurprisingly my review hasn't yet made it onto the site. Why do British consumers get less information than their American counterparts?

  174. Re: Pretty easy to boycott Sony by snotclot · · Score: 1

    WOW. That is dedication. If I actually spent the time beforehand figuring out exactly which studios made what and who owns what studios, I might just do the same. But, *sigh*, I'm afraid I'm far too lazy for that...

  175. SONY 0? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    You paid money for their disc. Then you had to work extra hard just to use it.

    How do you see Sony as scoring 0 here? They still got your money.

    Don't buy DRM CDs. If you do, the only things available will be DRM CDs. And eventually, they'll get the DRM right (or right enough) that you can't get the stuff off. Then where will you be?

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  176. Microsoft? Admitting mistakes? by argent · · Score: 1

    Well at least Microsoft is a little more forecoming on its shortcomings and will admit they @#$%^ up.

    When? They'll admit to something that sounds good that lets them save face and doesn't actually commit them to doing anything about any real problems. The real mistakes that they've turned into a major part of their core business model? Things that would actually make a real long-term improvement in the security of Windows and in the reliability of the world's information infrastructure? Hell no.

    They're still at the "we don't need safety belts" stage. Denial. It's not their fault. Really.

  177. Re:Reminds me of something I did by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

    If you download something and choose to "Open from current location" in IE, or "Open with..." in Firefox, it saves the file to this hidden directory. If you choose to open it manually after you've saved it to your hard drive, it's somewhere you can see, as you had to navigate the directory tree to be able to save the file.

    Nothing untoward about this at all.

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  178. I had a professor rant about this yesterday by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 1

    He just opened up his lecture yesterday talking about the rootkit, and telling us to get fired up/complain/boycott/etc. He also kept bringing his lecture back to Sony a few times after that (e.g. something like "I don't like this, about as much as I don't like Sony putting this stuff on people's computers").

    IIRC, he used to be the Associate Dean of CS at my uni (or some similar high position) until last year, so he's got quite a bit of local clout.

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  179. Mainstream? by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    The Inq is mainstream? I am press? Wow, thanks. :)

              -Charlie

  180. Don't Sue, Tell Steve Ballmer by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

    That according to F-secure installing the Sony program on a machine running Windows Vista -- the beta version of Windows' next iteration -- "breaks the operating system spectacularly."

    Woo-hoo, I can just see it now:
    Ballmer: Sony's crap does WHAT!!!!!!?
    [Picks up his desk and thows it across the room and through the wall.]
    Ballmer: I'm gonna fucking kill SONY, those wimps! I've done it before and ... etc.

    --
    If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
  181. Misuse of words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I resent your misuse of the word 'Hacker', which by its original intent and nature should be a title of honor given to respected specialists of their trade.

    Please, in the future, call the people who install rootkits by their designated name: crackers.

    1. Re:Misuse of words by chrome · · Score: 1

      give it up, nobody cares anymore.

  182. Security by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I used to work in a county budget office.

    The PC on my desk ran several proccesses to manipulate a $2,000,000,000 dollar budget, checking for accounting errors, backing up the database, printing reports. Along with Payroll information for Prosecutors, Judges, Sherriff's deputies, jail guards, tax assessors, election officials... (the highest payed employee was the Coroner) Think how interesting the home address, SSN, etc. of some of those folks could be to, for example, a convicted murderer.

    I also listened to music while working (David Bowie, 'Earthling' for the most part)

    I'm glad I bought my own seperate CD player in, instead of using the one built into the PC.

  183. Securia Advisory about Sony DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Secunia has released a security advisory about the Sony DRM at this link: http://secunia.com/advisories/17408/

  184. this would be satisfying!! by taylorc209 · · Score: 1

    ok so all the /. community gets pissed and boycots sony. does sony care that much? when will a disgruntled /.er break into sony's computers and install there very own f****** rootkit except with a whole slew of $sys$ viruses? anything to cause them the pain they are causing windows users with this.

  185. A patch -- ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See latest washington post item. As if this makes things all peache.

  186. Just emailed this to sony... by MaTriXxx1 · · Score: 1

    Well your First4Internet DRM shit just fucked up my home computer, This is to inform you that I will NEVER purchase ANYTHING from you, ever again. You have just lost a shitload of money, and I will make sure to inform anyone that listens, of your horrible DRM shit. The audacity to install such bullshit on a system, is amazing. Apparently I am not the only person that is now officially boycotting all your "infected with drm" crap.
    http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/05/11/02/1421250.shtml ?tid=233&tid=17
    When your sales drop significantly this year, dont blame it on pirated goods, or a poor market.... its poor products, people wont stand for this shit anymore.
    PS. I will grab every last sony Item I own and return it to the store I bought it from, Hell, I may even keep buying SOny items, opening em up, and returning them as defective... I'll bet that will screw up your sales as much as you have screwed up my system.

    --
    Do NOT goto this URL http://www.forthesims.com
  187. Alert The Authorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://tips.fbi.gov/

    This has to be illegal. Call the cops on them!

  188. Re: Pretty easy to boycott Sony by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    They were really rude and the supervisors didn't give a damn and I got really pissed off. In another few years I probably won't even remember why I'm mad (it was a minor matter of a less than 30 bucks and really more about getting an apology that they boned me and I told them at the time it would probably cost them future purchases and pointed out the couple thousand bucks of electronics I had previously purchased from them).

    I'm not mad any more. But now it's a habit.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  189. Doesn't matter... by edinjapan · · Score: 1

    It really doesn't... Until they pull your name out of the hat and decide you have to cough up a couple hundred thousand dollars. Then it matters!

    --
    Fish....More than just sushi
  190. SlySoft have a fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the Slysoft web site: http://www.slysoft.com/en/anydvd.html

    AnyDVD tackles Sony DRM Rootkit Virus!
    If AnyDVD is installed and active on your PC, the new so-called "Sony DRM Rootkit Virus" has no access to your system and the affected audio CD appears unprotected regardless! Another good reason to get AnyDVD!

  191. Another DMCA Violation? by Arokh · · Score: 1

    I know I'm a little late with this reply but this topic has had me fuming all day. Maybe this has already been said, but I had a thought:

    Is it safe to assume that Sony sells these discs in both copy-protected, and non-copy-protected flavors (different markets, laws, whatnot)? So if I'm at store #1 and I see some poor kid about to buy a copy-protected CD and I tell him to go to store #2 where he can get it non-copy-protected and he does and then makes illegal copies, is that a violation of the DMCA? After all, I disclosed how to get around the copy protection (by shopping elsewhere)...

    Tell someone where to shop = jail time. ?!

    I used to like Sony...

  192. Unless, of course... by msauve · · Score: 1
    one writes their own changes to the EULA before breaking the shrinkwrap. If contracts where one party has no choice are valid, make sure that one party is the other guy.

    Myself, I just paste a stick over the offending EULA with a replacement contract, such as:

    "By allowing the purchaser to break the shrinkwrap seal, the software vendor and all associated parties explicitly agree that the following license agreement replaces and overrides all others:

    1) The user can use the enclosed media and any software and/or data contained thereon for any and all purposes.

    2) The user has authorization from the copyright holder to make copies for any purpose the user desires.

    3) The user has a right to full support of the software, including but not limited to, access to any and all revisions, corrections, or enhancements which may be made to it in the future."

    I then give them a few seconds to respond before I proceed to open the software, consumating said license.

    Thanks for playing the non-negitiable "shrinkwrap license" game. You have lost.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  193. Its NOT Civil its CRIMINAL by Muchsake · · Score: 1

    I thought US law would apply but now that you have pointed out that it is a UK company responsible it is straightforward Criminal Law. We need expert opinion from a UK based IT law specialist but this definitley falls inside the remit of the Misuse of Computers Act and the Unfair Contracts Act. It also explains what happened to the laptop a friend is bringing round for me to fix on Sunday.

  194. Something else you can do by msouth · · Score: 1

    If you are reading this, go to the parent post's link: http://slashdot.org/~xtracto/journal/121088 and then follow the link to (at least) one randomly selected product at amazon. Look at the reviews, and mark "helpful" all the reviews that mention the DRM.

    That will do a little more to get the message out.

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  195. Flashback - Beastie Boys by damo65 · · Score: 1

    A year ago didn't we have the same argument regarding the Beastie Boys album To The 5 Boroughs? Hey! EMI! It always amazes me that apparently intelligent people make mountains out of molehills so quickly. Everyone's immediately gone all "Sony have deliberately contaminated my PC". On what evidence? And why? If you read the article it's harshest claim is that the software appears to act like a rootkit and may, potentially, prove to be a security risk. Turn off your PC's. Now! A higher risk is being connected to the internet! Sony are completely within their rights to stop you copying (or, at least, to try to stop you!) your CDs. When you buy a CD you are buying something which you are not allowed to copy. Read the small print people! In most of the world the copy-protected CD is normal. Suddenly it appears in the USA and it's the end of the world? Get over it! And, get around it! There are any number of online guides to guide you through the process. I used to think that the /.'s were intelligent. With every day, I'm less and less sure.

  196. Sony in Deep Doo-Doo by AUDIOMIND · · Score: 1

    Sony Issues Patch As Hackers Pounce On Rootkit
    Sony posts a patch that reveals files previously hidden by a rootkit.

    But that may be closing the barn door after the horses have bolted.
    http://update.techweb.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/erme0GTTVw 0G4T0DqlJ0Gp

  197. Investigation Sony's DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We would be interested in speaking to U.S. residents that have purchased any Sony BMG audio CD protected by the XCP copy protection scheme. We have looked at many DRM cases and Sony went too far with this particular scheme. You can contact us at gw@classcounsel.com or at http://www.classcounsel.com/

  198. A bit belated, but here it is... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1
    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  199. Re:Here's the address of the guy to write to at So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... What is she wearing ?