Slashdot Mirror


Apple Announces iTunes 7, Movies, Set-Top Box

necro81 writes, "As anticipated, Apple announced several additions and upgrades to its iPod and iTunes lineup. The iPod now comes in an 80 GB model, with a $50 price drop for the 30 GB model. The 2nd generation iPod Nano harkens back to the iPod Mini with metallic, multi-colored shells (though as diminutive as ever) and comes in an 8 GB model. The Shuffle has been completely redesigned and shrunk down to the size of a matchbook. All of this comes with the release of iTunes 7, which includes support for downloading full-length movies from iTMS." All 75 movies initially available are from Disney-related studios. The new iTunes will download cover art for all the songs in your library, no matter where you got them from, as long as you have an iTunes account. (A confirmation dialog says: "Information about songs with missing artwork will be sent to Apple. Apple does not keep any information related to the contents of your music library.") There's a new album-cover browsing view of your library. And Steve Jobs gave a sneak preview of a project code-named iTV: a Mac Mini-like wireless set-top box. Engadget has a blow-by-blow of Steve Jobs's presentation.

710 comments

  1. I liked the old nano... by rtilghman · · Score: 2, Interesting


    While the capacities of the new one are nice, the design isn't nearly as sleek or sophisticated as the original nano design. It's a shame, I kind of detest Apple in general as fan-boy garbage (Rio Karma baby), but I did like the polish of the 1G Nano.

    -rt

    1. Re:I liked the old nano... by GmAz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know, I kinda dig the new Nano. I liked the colors, espically when a family has kids (or adults) with more than one nano in the house. It helps to seperate them. Also, you could always get the skins for the Nanos, but then the size got bigger. I would liked to have seen some bluetooth or wifi capabilities for transfering the music/video wirelessly, but guess not.

      --
      Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
    2. Re:I liked the old nano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I also like the old shuffle better. The big thing being that it can play while charging if you are not using a computer to charge it. I have a habit of leaving it on in my car and coming back to a drained battery. If I had the new shuffle I would have to charge and remove it from the dock to play. Not very practicle.

    3. Re:I liked the old nano... by CerebusUS · · Score: 2, Funny

      4GB? No WiFi? Lame. :-)

      I like that they went back to the mini-style cases, less worry of scratches.

    4. Re:I liked the old nano... by OECD · · Score: 1

      I liked the colors, espically when a family has kids (or adults) with more than one nano in the house. It helps to seperate them.

      Ditto that. I had to get a new skin for my phone because the GF and I would get them mixed up otherwise.

      --
      One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    5. Re:I liked the old nano... by denebian+devil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ditto that. I had to get a new skin for my phone because the GF...

      Ok, you had me up until that point, but girlfriend? Please. What are you doing on /. then?

    6. Re:I liked the old nano... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      While the capacities of the new one are nice, the design isn't nearly as sleek or sophisticated as the original nano design.

      I prefered the orginal design, though if this is what they have on offer, then they probably believe this is what people want. I must admit that I have got so used to Apple to coming up with new designs, that I am starting to feel that we haven't had anything really new in a while, style wise.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    7. Re:I liked the old nano... by JWW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lack of WiFi doesn't bother me. What would you use it for? Syncing?

      If I'm close enough to sync I can plug in. I need to charge anyway.

      WiFi would be cool for sharing music, but the music industry would never allow THAT.

    8. Re:I liked the old nano... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Waiting for her to get back from school?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:I liked the old nano... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      They could have also reintroduced the original Nano design in new colors, or just come up with something completely new.

      It's not that the new designs are bad, but the fact that they went back to a previous design is a bit of a disappointment. I feel like Apple isn't trying very hard because they know there are plenty of people out there who will buy their products no matter what they do.

    10. Re:I liked the old nano... by saider · · Score: 3, Funny


      And it would be nice to recharge the batteries wirelessly as well.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    11. Re:I liked the old nano... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a 5-digit UID you should be old enough to get that reference. No Wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

      I wonder how many iPods were engraved with that quote on the back. Probably more than the total number of Nomads ever made...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    12. Re:I liked the old nano... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I think it's a reference to CmdrTaco's original thoughts about the first iPod (less space than a Nomad, no Wifi; lame).

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    13. Re:I liked the old nano... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Damn....I've been holding out on buying an iPod on hopes they'd finally put out a true video iPod (full screen, touchscreen wheel).

      How much longer till the next rollout of new Apple products? Wondering if I'll still wait, or go ahead and get one of these new 80G ones....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:I liked the old nano... by rthille · · Score: 2, Funny

      Big deal, my toothbrush does that.

      Still have to get too close.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    15. Re:I liked the old nano... by ximenes · · Score: 0

      I got it, don't worry.

    16. Re:I liked the old nano... by metroplex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The major complaint about the Nano was that its surface got scratched too easily. Apple fixes this by going back to alluminium while keeping the same size factor, and adds "fancy" colours (ok, I'm not a big fan of those either, but you can get a black or silver one anyway), and people keep complaining? Geez.

      --
      "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
    17. Re:I liked the old nano... by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1
      I got it, don't worry.
      I don't get it, I'm worried.
      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    18. Re:I liked the old nano... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      touchscreen wheel

      Sounds like a great idea until you remember how screens tend to look after people have been putting the fingers all over them.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    19. Re:I liked the old nano... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I like the new iPod nano better because it essentially duplicates on a smaller scale the old iPod mini design, which I thought was the best-designed of the iPod units.

    20. Re:I liked the old nano... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Sounds like a great idea until you remember how screens tend to look after people have been putting the fingers all over them."

      yeah..but, that full screen would be much better to watch full screen videos on...could just carry a wipe rag like people do for glasses.....?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    21. Re:I liked the old nano... by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Solar-powered iPod?

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    22. Re:I liked the old nano... by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Why not, you can solar power your Nintendo DS, GBA SP, or PSP?

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    23. Re:I liked the old nano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Middle school?

    24. Re:I liked the old nano... by pdxmac · · Score: 2, Interesting
    25. Re:I liked the old nano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      could just carry a wipe rag

      Which would also come in handy (pardon the pun) when watching pr0n ...
    26. Re:I liked the old nano... by stemcell · · Score: 1

      Waiting for one of the other /. guys to finish posting so that he can go back to pretending to be a girl on IRC...

    27. Re:I liked the old nano... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What??

      I had an iPod mini and when the hard disk died I bought the new iPod nano. It was all new, shiny and small, but I still thought that it was a shame it didn't look more like mini. iPod mini should be studied as an example of a great design, extremely simple but yet spectacular. And now it comes in nano size and black color, and I'm really tempted to buy one although this time there is nothing wrong with my iPod nano.

      Tina

  2. Gapless Playback! by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gapless Payck for iPod! Wonder if they will update the 5th gen with this?? Please???

    1. Re:Gapless Playback! by mblase · · Score: 1

      I only noticed this enhancement after I installed iTunes 7 and watched it updating my library for gapless something-or-other.

      About time. I mean, it only took them until version 7....

    2. Re:Gapless Playback! by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      It's what's been keeping me fom buying an iPod - actually it's what's been stopping me
      from buying an mp3 player that costs more than £20

      I know the Karma (rip) and one of the sony players does it - but the karma had flaky hard drives
      and the sony (IIRC) needed the crappy sony software.

      This just might swing the balance now.
      I had thought about a san-disk as rockbox would possibly bring out gapless playback - but in the meantime i guess Apple may now
      get my cash.

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    3. Re:Gapless Playback! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      iTunes has been able to do this since version 1... It's only the iPod that had trouble.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    4. Re:Gapless Playback! by tji · · Score: 5, Informative

      I haven't finished sync'ing my video iPod yet, but after installing iTunes 7, it brought up a dialog as it went through my library saying it was updating for gapless playback.

      This would imply that it's done within the audio files themselves, perhaps making it usable on all iPods.

      I'll see shortly.

      The new music view/organize modes in iTunes are great. One is divided by albums, showing a small image of the album cover along with all the tracks. The other looks like they licensed "Cover Flow", it looks like flipping through albums in your old physical collection. Definitely better visual feedback then scrolling through a huge text list of songs.

    5. Re:Gapless Playback! by Van+Halen · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is the biggest news as far as I'm concerned. I've been bitching about this since I got my first iPod. I've looked at alternatives, and nothing came close in overall features and seamless integration with the music library. The few gapless alternatives were pretty crappy otherwise and left out major features I'd grown accustomed to. For the last year, I've held off replacing my iPod that was stolen just because of the lack of gapless playback. I refused to give them any more money for a seriously flawed product (for my needs, not for most people's needs, obviously). The fact that it should have been easy to fix always bugged me.

      Did Apple finally listen?

      I'm going to have to play around with this soon to see if it's truly up to par. If it works on 5th gen iPods, then I can test it on my wife's iPod before buying one of my own. This is exciting, because it was the last feature I've been wanting for my music listening experience. If it works as advertised, the experience will finally be as close to perfection as it can get for me. Can't wait to try it out...

    6. Re:Gapless Playback! by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gapless is what's been keeping me from upgrading as well. I've got an old black-and-white 20GB iPod which I've been using the hell out of for years now (I've burned through two batteries on it, and was planning on buying yet another in a few months.)

      Color screens did not make me want to replace it.
      Nor did photos.
      Nor did putting the buttons on the clickwheel.
      Nor did the longer battery life.
      Nor did videos.

      But gapless playback? They hooked me. I RAN to the Apple Store over my lunch hour, only to be told to "check again tomorrow", which I most certainly will do.

      The sweet thing about this is, since it also plays videos and a smattering of time-killer games, I can sell off both my old iPod and my souped-up PSP to friends who want them, and just about break even on the upgrade! w00t!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Gapless Playback! by Van+Halen · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, iTunes has never had true gapless playback. There's always been at least a slight hiccup in between tracks, no matter how you set it up. The old crossfade set to 0 trick also wasn't a complete solution - if you had a transition with a fast tempo, you'd hear it screw up a beat or two.

      I'm really eager to try this out and see if they truly fixed it.

    8. Re:Gapless Playback! by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

      so? does it work? can you do gapless on the "older" ipods? (I am assuming you don't already have a new one...)

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    9. Re:Gapless Playback! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gapless Playback for iPod! Wonder if they will update the 5th gen with this?? Please???

      Don't get too excited, MP3s encoded with too old a version of LAME would need to be re-encoded as these older version automatically padded the file. You should be fine with AAC though.

    10. Re:Gapless Playback! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It looks like Apple bought CoverFlow. link

    11. Re:Gapless Playback! by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

      Hang on a moment, is this true gapless like Rockbox offers, or is it gap deletion like on some players, like the iRiver?

    12. Re:Gapless Playback! by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

      replying to my own post... *ahem*

      I wonder if only aac files will be gapless? or will it do mp3 as well
      maybe if encoded with lame?

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    13. Re:Gapless Playback! by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      >The other looks like they licensed "Cover Flow"

      I've been waiting ages for CoverFlow RC1 to be released, finally downloaded it yesterday. Now what do you know, two come along at once...

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    14. Re:Gapless Playback! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people are insane. Seriously.

    15. Re:Gapless Playback! by cweber · · Score: 1

      Gapless playback seems to work on my old style Shuffle.

      The CoverFlow view is awesome. Near instantaneous searching through your sensory channel with the most bandwidth - visual!

    16. Re:Gapless Playback! by Kijori · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You should look at the Archos ones - with the latest firmware they have gapless playback. (And may always have had, I've never used mine without the firmware upgrades).

    17. Re:Gapless Playback! by npietraniec · · Score: 1

      You are completely wrong... It's only been able to do crossfade (ugh)

    18. Re:Gapless Playback! by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 3, Informative
      From TFA:

      10:06AM - "You might be listening to Abbey Road or Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, and one track doesn't flow seamlessly into the next. We are going to put this back together as it was intended and offer Gapless Playback for songs encoded with MP3, AAC, and Apple Lossless."
      --
      Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
    19. Re:Gapless Playback! by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just downloaded iTunes 7 and pluged in my 20 GB 2nd Gen iPod (probably the same one you have - the first one with the non-turning wheel). I was pretty impressed that it copied the music from the iPod to my work Mac and pulled down the album cover art and things look really nice. I'm impressed.

      And I'm seriously considering the 80GB model...

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    20. Re:Gapless Playback! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Exactly correct.

      It sounds like the fix must be something people were hoping they would do for some time now: Add a meta-tag which declares how much "silece" was added at the ending (and possibly the beginning) of each track by the encoder, and then synch up the files in the memory buffer so they roll right from one to the next.

      I wonder if they will use some kind of meta-data wrapper for MP3 files acquired from other sources, since there is nothing in the default MP3 headers for storing such info. I know a lot of people who still use MP3s on their iPod, out of fear that they might want to switch platforms to a non-AAC player someday, and don't want to archive files losslessly (for some reason). It would be a bummer for them if they need to re-encode everything to take advantage of this feature.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    21. Re:Gapless Playback! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use the standard ID3v2 tags. Among lots of predefined records, the ID3v2 spec allows for custom metadata records.

    22. Re:Gapless Playback! by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Don't the recent MP3 tag formats support arbitrary tags? I would imagine Apple is just adding a gapless tag, which may not be compatible with other implementations but should work for all their software and hardware. Otherwise they'll just store the information in the iTunes Library file like they do when a file's tag can't be written to or it doesn't support particular data.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    23. Re:Gapless Playback! by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I'm with you too... but from what it looks like, and from the other things Apple's site is advertising (games), these new iPods are still CONSIDERED 5th generation, they've just got an improved screen, battery life, and come in an 80GB version. Further evidence is that in the "games" section it says "games are only available for 5th generation iPods". So these are simply the B series of the 5th Gen iPod line, in other words, I think those of us with older 5th gen models will be in the clear. I'll have to see if there's a new iPod update when I get home, but FINALLY I'll be able to listen to all my progrock concept albums (which consists of a good 25% of my collection) without breaks! Happy is me!

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    24. Re:Gapless Playback! by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      I was also impressed that it stopped checking the gapless settings on my whole library and immediately started updating the gapless settings on just the tracks on my iPod when I plugged it in. Good prioritization.

      I'm scared of telling it to update album art, how well does it do? A fully automated system makes me worry I'm going to have all sorts of songs with hilariously incorrect artwork on them.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    25. Re:Gapless Playback! by flooey · · Score: 1

      I'm scared of telling it to update album art, how well does it do? A fully automated system makes me worry I'm going to have all sorts of songs with hilariously incorrect artwork on them.

      It did just fine on mine, though it didn't add anything for a few of my albums, presumably because they don't sell it in the iTMS (though I haven't checked that).

    26. Re:Gapless Playback! by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ooo... so they fixed for the old-school iPods too!?

      Thanks! That's good to know!

      (Time to go bust up all those "joined" tracks on Dark Side of the Moon tonight. ^_^)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    27. Re:Gapless Playback! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's probably calculating Mel Coefficients for the very end and beginning of songs. If the match is close enough, play these tracks together. God no, they'd better not be editing the songs themselves. (or writing fade files)

    28. Re:Gapless Playback! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not at home right now, so it only updated the album artwork from songs I had actually purchased on iTMS. However, it did that job perfectly with no mistakes. We'll see what happens when I try it at home with all my songs - I've got songs on there that are demo tapes from bands I was in HS/College and songs that I ripped from vinyl that is out of print and never released on CD, so we'll see if it is smart enough to not place any artwork on those.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    29. Re:Gapless Playback! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd been holding back on getting an iPod before, but I guess I'll be getting one now. Horslip's Book of Invasions doesn't sound quite right with a gap between, for instance, "Dusk" and "Sword of Light".

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    30. Re:Gapless Playback! by JAK · · Score: 1

      I just installed iTunes 7, then the iPod update...verified that a couple of my MP3 ripped songs were correctly degapitated.

    31. Re:Gapless Playback! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW: I had some CDs I made by digitally archiving my vinyl stuff, such as David Bowie's "Hunky Dorey" and the soundtrack from "The Blues Brothers".

      ITMS recognized the tracks on my burned CDs perfectly, and attached all the CDDB data to the tags when I loaded them into iTunes. It really shocked me, as I had assumed that they were only reading the ID tags off commercial CDs. Turns out that they can scan the track itself and recognize the file. Ain't technology grand?

    32. Re:Gapless Playback! by geekoid · · Score: 0

      ". I RAN to the Apple Store over my lunch hour, "

      that explains the rings that appeard in my coffee cup...

      cheap, but funny.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Gapless Playback! by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      I can confirm that the second half of Abbey Road now plays properly on iTunes 7 and my 5G video ipod. 'Polythene Pam' goes into 'She Came in through the Bathroom Window' with no gap at all. Abbey Road as it was meant to be! Happy dance!

    34. Re:Gapless Playback! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      I just tried it with my 5th Gen iPod (with The Wall, natch :). Worked a charm, although there's a telltale volume difference between tracks if you have Sound Check enabled.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    35. Re:Gapless Playback! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I said elsewhere, it works on my 5th gen, although Sound Check creates a noticeable volume change between the two songs.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    36. Re:Gapless Playback! by Golias · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. Cool.

      I'm sure Ars or Tom's Hardware or somebody will break down how it actually works sometime in the next few weeks. I majored in the humanities, so I'll just use it and leave it to people like that to explain it. :)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    37. Re:Gapless Playback! by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      Gapless playback works by taking (intelligently) the last few frames(?) of song data and appending it to the next track. I have learned this ripping wav's to cd's with programs like bladenc (-nogap) and watching what it does. There is no way it could go through all the files and then know which order they would always play in. What maybe is happening is that its saving some kind of meta data into some sort of database of how far to chop out of each song. It still doesn't make sense because I thought that you have to rip the cds with gaplessness in mind. They have evidently found a different way to do it but i'll bet its on the fly.

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    38. Re:Gapless Playback! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Gapless is what's been keeping me from upgrading as well..."

      With the addition of gapless, I'm looking at them too. However, while reading the specs, it seems to indicate that these ONLY work with USB 2. My old iBook only has firewire and usb1. So, while I would 'guess' that the USB1 connection would be still ok to transfer music, I'd have to get the USB to AC wall connector to charge the darned thing. Or..can you still hook the iPod to firewire, which would recharge it? Is there a separate adapter for it or can you plug straight into the iPod with firewire still? Can you transfer files on firewire?

      I can't seem to find any info on this on the Apple site. Any insights or links?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    39. Re:Gapless Playback! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Just updated. There's an update for iTunes but NO firmware update for the iPod (neither my 5th or 4th gen).

    40. Re:Gapless Playback! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      As far as I am aware USB2 is *really* recommended, if only for the speed of transfer. If you have a powered USB1 port it will still work fine, it's just that transfer will be slower.

      I have had no issues using 4G, 5G or Nano iPods on USB1 (Other than slower, but still fast transfer).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    41. Re:Gapless Playback! by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it initially scans through your entire library, sorted by ALBUM, "listening" to the end of one song, vs. the beginning of the "next" song. If it detects no fade-out at the end of the "starting" song, it says, "ok, we will make this gapless with the next song". If this works with OLD iPods, then I think that it must indeed be doing SOMEthing to the audio files affected, but I can't figure out exactly how. All I know is that it works PERFECTLY playing from iTunes itself.

      They can remove the "Crossfade" slider now. I'm done with it...

      Apple's implementation of Gapless must work without database intervention, because it worked on all my old Emerson, Lake & Palmer "gapless" albums, for example "Pictures at an Exhibition", which is NOT in the iTS (we have to drop the "M" now, I guess), plus my String Cheese Incident "Carnival '99" live album, which is ALSO NOT IN THE STORE.

    42. Re:Gapless Playback! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      After initial playing around, my 4G still has a gap. Dammit.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    43. Re:Gapless Playback! by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same here, I can detect the volume difference. It would be nice if sound check determined a volume for the entire album, instead of on a per-track basis.

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    44. Re:Gapless Playback! by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Mp3 frames are fairly short. You examine the last frame and fine where it goes silent. Store the time differential from the beggining of the frame to this point. Skip this bit during play. It will mess up some few songs that care a beat between two songs but that have a complete silence between the beat; but it will just mess up the timing ever so slightly during that one beat which is much less distracting than an audible pause between flowing songs.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    45. Re:Gapless Playback! by smiffy1976 · · Score: 1
      This would imply that it's done within the audio files themselves, perhaps making it usable on all iPods.

      Sounds like an ugly hack to me. How come foobar2000 and Winamp manage it without a hitch?
    46. Re:Gapless Playback! by 666999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can still charge over firewire, but not sync.

      You can sync via USB 1.1, although it will be very slow.

    47. Re:Gapless Playback! by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Charging works fine over USB. Transfer also works fine, it's just slower. I use my Nano with an old "Quicksilver" G4 tower that only has USB 1 and Firewire. Because the Nano doesn't hold 30GB of songs, the slow transfer is an issue.

      If you only have USB 1, I recommend getting a smaller capacity iPod, from 1-4GB, and just regularly update the playlist, rather than keeping all your songs on a big iPod.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    48. Re:Gapless Playback! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Here's a guess: a PC can decode multiple streams of mp3 data at the same time and so is free to interpolate between data from different files for a smooth transition. On an iPod it's not the CPU doing the decoding but external hardware. And the output from that hardware goes straight to the DAC. So there's no way the iPod can mix two different mp3 streams. But that's just a guess.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    49. Re:Gapless Playback! by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Hmm... decisions...

      I use a PC at home and a Mac at work. So far, about the only thing that's really made me drool for a Mac has been CoverFlow, a simple but unfortunately Mac-unique program. I've always detested iTunes. That's a given. So, is CoverFlow on the PC enough of a killer app to justify installing the clunky behemoth iTunes?

      Now, if someone could make a PC version that just loaded the album into Winamp, I'd be happy.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    50. Re:Gapless Playback! by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it might be a few days/hours before there's one actually released. But I can't imagine why not... they're not calling these new ones 6th Gen iPods. It's not like their expecting people to drop another $250 for gapless playback, it's more worth it, from a marketting perspective, to them to make everyone happy and just allow updating of older ones, and use the new ones as a way of hooking new iPod users, or ones that are a few generations old.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    51. Re:Gapless Playback! by smiffy1976 · · Score: 1

      That sounds bogus to me. Surely the iPod must have some buffering capability to prevent skipping so it's simply a matter of pre-buffering the next song.

    52. Re:Gapless Playback! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Oh....so, even with some kind of adapter...you cannot transfer content via firewire? They dropped support for that totally? What about if you get the 'base' thing I"ve seen? That won't adapt to a firewire connection?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    53. Re:Gapless Playback! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      We know that iPods already have multiple entire songs loaded up into RAM before they are played. So clearly the problem is not one that can be fixed by pre-buffering alone.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    54. Re:Gapless Playback! by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      That's wonderful, I'll be able to unlink my old ELP, all my Flower Kings epics, Pink Floyd, Fates Warning (APSOG), and all that other great prog. Thank God that Jobs is a big fan of 70s classic rock!

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    55. Re:Gapless Playback! by 7Prime · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sound Check is just a normalizer, right? It goes through, finds the peak volume, and then amplifies everything up to the point that it's 0, right? Well, Mastering houses, as well as recording studios, normalize everying, anyway! So unless you're consantly listening to stuff put out by VG Remix kiddies or local garage bands who don't know what their doing, Sound Check is pretty worthless anyway. Sure, on a concept album, there might not be a peak in a particular track, do to the whole album being normalized together, but the difference is going to be about 1db-2db tops.

      My Advise: turn Sound Check off, it's pretty useless for MOST music listening applications.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    56. Re:Gapless Playback! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Firewire requires an extra chip in the iPod, which the new ones don't have. If I were you, I'd get either an iPod Mini or a 4G iPod (i.e., iPod Photo), as they were the last ones with Firewire support. In theory, if iTunes finally supports gapless playback, they might add support to older-gen iPods (via a firmware patch) as well...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    57. Re:Gapless Playback! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Polythene Pam -> She Came in through the Bathroom Window is fine for me, but something isn't quite right with the other transitions (e.g. Carry That Weight -> The End). Do those seem okay for you (in other words, do I need to re-rip my album, since I didn't do it with iTunes to begin with)?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    58. Re:Gapless Playback! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Bad news for old iPod owners. The 3rd gen player, anyway.

      While iTunes updates to tag files for gapless playback, the older iPods can't support it. I just tried it, and there's still the small hit of silence as it goes from one track to another.

      This is a huge bummer... for whoever I'm selling my old iPod to, anyway.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    59. Re:Gapless Playback! by flink · · Score: 1

      I've been using CoverFlow for a while now -- it used to be a separate product. It did a very good job on the initial import. IIRC, the original version searched Amazon and maybe a couple of other sites and it wouldn't replace your existing art, it would just skip those albums. I would say it got about 80% of my albums. It did the worst on electronic/techo stuff and my old Boston hardcore albums. I manually googled for the rest and after that, I flipped through the results and tried to find my own art for the really poor quality scans.

      I'm really pleased to see this get incorporated in iTunes. It's a much more pleasant way to browse your music if you enjoy listining to albums instead of flipping between tracks in an ADD-like fasion. I hope Apple compensated the author well for it.

    60. Re:Gapless Playback! by __aaxwdb6741 · · Score: 1

      But we also know that the RockBox alternative firmware for iPod manages gapless playback of mp3 files just perfectly.
      What gives?

    61. Re:Gapless Playback! by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      They sounded fine to me too.

    62. Re:Gapless Playback! by jault · · Score: 1

      Same results here with my 4th gen.

    63. Re:Gapless Playback! by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I never noticed the gaps, but last night I grabed iTunes 7.0. It's pretty nice. Playback is a lot smoother now, but it seems to eat a lot more RAM. Oh, and it didn't download ANY cover art, not sure why, I have quite a few common CD's on my computer (possibly spelling errors and the like). It's not a big deal though, I have a nano and it's getting pretty full (3.2GB of 4GB, the point where you start to hold back, or delete unused content). This really makes me want an 8GB model now. Triple battery life, 8Gigs, and a screen that can burn through your rhaetena in seconds, or light your path for hours. Sweet.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    64. Re:Gapless Playback! by Taagehornet · · Score: 1
      This would imply that it's done within the audio files themselves

      I thought the same but no, if you run a checksum on your files before and after the import you'll see that they are left untouched.

    65. Re:Gapless Playback! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      (Sigh) Okay, I guess it's time to re-rip them, then. I needed to re-do it in a lossless format anyway...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    66. Re:Gapless Playback! by metroplex · · Score: 1

      Yup, it does, I just tried it on mine! Great news for the lovers of Dj-sets and other things you don't want gaps in.

      --
      "Words of wisdom: drop that zero and get with the hero" -- Vanilla Ice
  3. THey also added gapless playback by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As well as an overhaul of the iTunes interface. One of the weirder things they added though was the "explicit" warning to music bought from the music store that is well, explicit.

    But perhaps most shocking and sacrilegious: they changed the color of the music note! It is blue now! How could they destroy tradition like that!

    1. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty certain it used to be blue before it was green...back in OS 9 days.

    2. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it wasn't always green. way back in the day it was purple, and maybe blue.

    3. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 1

      iTunes 1 was three notes, all different shades of purple. iTunes 2 was blue. iTunes 3 and later have been green.

      --
      This signature was left intentionally blank.
    4. Re:THey also added gapless playback by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      they changed the color of the music note! It is blue now!
      As the AC said, it's been blue before. It was also purple for a while. Apple changes it around every so often.

      One of the weirder things they added though was the "explicit" warning to music bought from the music store that is well, explicit.
      I'm not following you. That little warning has been there forever. The cleaned versions of explicit songs even get a little "CLEAN" tag to say that they're alternate versions. Apple has other tags as well, but they don't show up as often.
    5. Re:THey also added gapless playback by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      But perhaps most shocking and sacrilegious: they changed the color of the music note! It is blue now! How could they destroy tradition like that!

      The color of the iTunes icon has changed a few times now. IIRC, it turned green with the launch of iTunes for Windows and the ITMS. Now that they're selling movies, it's gone (back to) blue.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was blue (and other colors) before.

      Behold! The iTunes Icon Timeline! Note that the icons on that page are the real deal until you get to "Alternative iTunes icons", then the rest are mildly crappy "fan art". (Ugh.)

    7. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      By the way, that sinking sound you hear coming from Redmond is the hope of Microsoft in taking over the living room through Zune, the XBox 360, and Media Center PCs.

      Although, it could also be a chair sailing out the window. I bet they're bolting down everything in the campus today.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    8. Re:THey also added gapless playback by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's back to the way it started. The first os 8 versions of itunes used blue notes.

    9. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

      When are they going to utilize the brown note?

    10. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Chode2235 · · Score: 1

      Itunes without movies is like Hal Melvin without the blue notes, it'll never go platinum. Yo, Daz gimme a light.....

    11. Re:THey also added gapless playback by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      they changed the color of the music note! It is blue now! How could they destroy tradition like that!

      You mean the tradition of changing the color of the music note for every new version of iTunes?

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    12. Re:THey also added gapless playback by vought · · Score: 1

      Although, it could also be a chair sailing out the window. I bet they're bolting down everything in the campus today.,/i>

      Exactly. instead having to buy a MCPC or an XBox360 PLUS another box, Apple offers mac and PC-compatible wireless iTunes streaming to the PC for $299.00.

      The crumpling sound you'll hear over the next few months is the Windows Media hull as it slowly sinks into the Marianas trench of technology. XBox can have the gaming market - Apple will be selling a lot of these boxes, whatever they end up being called.

      Now - if they can only accelerate the schedule and get them out, working, by Christmas.

    13. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Ullteppe · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Seriously? Personally I thought today's announcements were kind of underwhelming. No big updates on the big iPod, more scratch-resistant nanos and new form factor on the shuffle, and some capacity hikes. Nothing groundbreaking, really. The Zune has some really new stuff: WiFi, music sharing etc. And the iPod games were pretty laughable: I have better games on my phone, and the scroll wheel isn't especially well suited for games. Pretty happy I picked up a PSP last week: Much better for video (although Sony should get a clue and throw out UMD and put in a harddisk) and much better for gaming. I'll keep my old iPod for music for now.

    14. Re:THey also added gapless playback by k_187 · · Score: 1

      I believe that they didn't show up in itunes though after you'd purchased the tracks from the store. Now they do. At least that's what I'm assuming the grandparent was thinking.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    15. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
      When are they going to utilize the brown note?
      They won't, it looks like crap.
    16. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, if plagarism is the highest form of flattery, then MS must be feeling pretty darn good right now.

    17. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      And how are they being plagiarized in any way, shape, or form whatsoever?

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    18. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1
      The cleaned versions of explicit songs even get a little "CLEAN" tag to say that they're alternate versions.

      Is the tag a little bitmap of Tipper Gore's face?
    19. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Yes... she even waggles her finger admonishingly in an animated gif, "Uh uh uh!"

    20. Re:THey also added gapless playback by westlake · · Score: 1
      By the way, that sinking sound you hear coming from Redmond is the hope of Microsoft in taking over the living room through Zune, the XBox 360, and Media Center PCs.

      Microsoft has the living room, the den, the basement playroom and the kids' bedrooms upstairs. The Mac Geek has been trumpeting the death of Microsoft in the consumer market for twenty-five years. You will excuse me if I do not hold my breath.

    21. Re:THey also added gapless playback by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's a lighter shade of blue now, with a different gradient on the bar connecting the notes.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:THey also added gapless playback by drsmithy · · Score: 0
      By the way, that sinking sound you hear coming from Redmond is the hope of Microsoft in taking over the living room through Zune, the XBox 360, and Media Center PCs.

      Bollocks. Even this iTV thing, when it ships, will be just like using an XBox 360 as an "MCE Extender" *only without the ability to play games, and for the same price*.

      (Somewhat ironically, however, a Core Duo Mini running Windows MCE would (IMHO) make an excellent base to build a high-def capable HTPC from.)

    23. Re:THey also added gapless playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of any of these? Probably not. They're not exactly advertised on buses.

      http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=438&sec=0
      http://www.digitrexusa.com/PFS.php
      http://www.digion.com/en/pf/pro/dx_main.htm
      http://www.rokulabs.com/

      While none of these guys are really Microsoft, they all support Microsoft's PlaysForSure standard. The basic difference between these and iTV is iTV works (only) with iTunes. And Roku is audio-only (and less expensive), but follows the same concept.

      And, of course, there is also XBox 360+PC.

  4. play by play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    MacRumorsLive
    09:51 am iLounge: Griffin Technology, Belkin, Incase and Nike are in attendance.
    09:52 am iLounge: Folks are crowding to get up-front seats. (wonder why?)
    10:03 am iLounge: theater is filled to capacity (755 person theater). Podium on the right, a computer setup on the left of the stage (looks like an iMac)
    10:04 am the event appears to have begun
    10:05 am iLounge: talks about iPod sports kit. Foot Locker is blown away by sales. 450,000 sales in 90 days
    10:06 am iLounge: iPods. 3 iPods: iPod, Nano, and Shuffle
    10:07 am iLounge: iPod is getting enhanced today. 60% brighter with brighness control, 3.5 hours video playback (up from 2 hrs... big version goes to 6.5 hours), new headphones, gapless playback
    10:08 am iLounge: new iPod software features: instant searching, new games (Bejeweled, Cubis 2, Mahjong, Mini golf, pac man, tetris, texas holdem, vortex, and zuma)
    10:09 am iLounge: games for sale off iTunes for $4.99
    10:10 am iLounge: games will work on 5G ipods
    10:12 am iLounge: 249 and 349 with 60GB and 80GB capacity [SHOULD BE 30GB, 80GB. See below]
    10:12 am iLounge: Nano is now, as rumored, Aluminum and in colors
    10:14 am iLounge: Green silver black blue pink
    10:14 am iLounge: 24 hour batter life
    10:15 am iLounge: New software just like standard iPod
    10:16 am iLounge: 3 models, but with double storage capacity at each model (and varying colors available)
    10:16 am iLounge: 2GB is $149 in silver only
    10:16 am iLounge: 4GB is $199 in all colors but black
    10:16 am iLounge: 8GB is $249 in all colors
    10:17 am iLounge: All models are 52% smaller in volume than previous nano. new charger, new armband, new lanyard
    10:18 am iLounge: iPod Shuffle is now 2nd generationl size of iPod Radio Remote
    10:21 am iLounge: metal body, 1 model (1GB), $79, ships in october.
    10:22 am Engadget: (for nano) $149 2GB ipod is aluminum only, $199 4GB has colors, $249 8GB is black only
    10:23 am iLounge: iTunes 7 today
    10:24 am iLounge: Source list now includes library with sep libraries for all forms of media
    10:24 am iLounge: Store now has own section, devices have their own sections, playlists too
    10:25 am iLounge: iTunes will give you cover art for free if you are missing cover art (thanks Steve)
    10:26 am iLounge: 3 different views of iTunes, list view, album view (with art and tracks), then "cover flow view" lets you rapidly find what you want by album cover
    10:27 am iLounge: iPod updater appears to be now integrated into iTunes
    10:28 am iLounge: TV shows are now encoded at 640x480 (h264), up from 320x240
    10:28 am Engadget: Today we're introducing the biggest single enhancement: iTunes 7
    You say "it looks the same," but it isn't
    [the left nav is more cleanly organized without being radically different]
    We've added a View switch, a 3-position switch. we've added a 2nd view called album view, so you can scroll through your music library and look at it by album. what if you ripped your CDs and don't have the covers? Today we're announcing free missing album cover art for all the music in your library if you have an itune acct. itunes will automatically download it for free
    but there's something even better. that's the third view. it's called Cover Flow view. [LOOKS LIKE FLIPPLING THROUGH YOUR CD RACK]
    10:30 am iLounge: you can now sync between multiple computers using an iPod, as long as both are authorized on the same account
    10:30 am Engadget: Now, all of this video is encoded with the best encoding in the world, H.264. We've been distributing it at 320x240. Today, we're going to take that up a notch to 640x480. That's 4x the resolution. iTunes 7 also has seamless playback for video.
    10:31 am 10:27AM Engadget: You can update your iPod from right inside iTunes now, you don't need to go to Preferences. You can say, "I want to sync the 10 most recent unwatched episides of all my TV shows."
    10:31 am iLounge: Demo of iT

    1. Re:play by play by ModernGeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could have provided a link: www.macrumorslive.com

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    2. Re:play by play by rthille · · Score: 1

      10:16 am iLounge: 8GB is $249 in all colors

      Seems to be false. At least, I don't seem to be able to order an 8GB in Pink for my wife. She's going to have to settle for the 4GB (since I think she's rather have that than black...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    3. Re:play by play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could have provided a link: www.macrumorslive.com

      That's not a link. This is a link. It only redirects to the regular macrumors page. AFAIK the live content is no longer accessible.
  5. DRM by Landak · · Score: 2, Informative

    Alas, I have just seen that one of the wondrous features the new iTunes Music Store boasts is the ability to lock out iTunes 5. This is the version I've been using on all my macs for one real reason - when I download their free singles of the week (which vary a lot in quality), I like to be able to remove the DRM immediately afterwards. It appears that I am being forced to upgrade. Ahh well. I can also presume that my 4th Gen iPod Colour will not be able to play the new games. How I love thy, apple....

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
    1. Re:DRM by PseudoQuant · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if they did anything to try to block the new QTFairUse6 from working. Does anyone have any knowledge or intelligent guesses about this?

    2. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      "I can also presume that my 4th Gen iPod Colour will not be able to play the new games. How I love thy, apple...."

      Let me see if I understand this. You bought a product that told you exactly what it did. Later, a new product comes out that does something different and your complaining because ....?

    3. Re:DRM by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Let me see if I understand this. You bought a product that told you exactly what it did. Later, a new product comes out that does something different and your complaining because ....?

      The poster isn't interested in being some corporation's permanent revenue stream. The poster, correctly, reads in Apple's move a bid to get him or her to replace a perfectly fine product with one that has an additional bell or whistle that could in all likelihood be retrofitted, in software, to the 4G iPod. What part of that eludes your grasp?

    4. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      the op got the product he bought. he knew what he was getting when he bought it. If the additional bell and whistle isn't that compelling he can stay with his current ipod that works exactly as it did when he decided to buy it. What part of that eludes you?

    5. Re:DRM by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Let me see if I understand this. You bought a product that told you exactly what it did.

      Yep, so far so good...

      Later, a new product comes out that does something different and your complaining because ....?

      Later, they disabled the product he bought so that it would no longer work. (iTunes 5) But, he can update to a *new* product (iTunes 7) that does *NOT* do what his old product did... and none of the new features will be of use to him either. (because his older device does not support the new features)

      Get it yet?

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    6. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      at least be honest. He did not buy iTunes 5. Your core premise is false.

      However, my point wasn't about itunes, it was about his ipod and his complaint that they released a new ipod. Your trying to change the subject as well :/

    7. Re:DRM by vought · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The poster, correctly, reads in Apple's move a bid to get him or her to replace a perfectly fine product with one that has an additional bell or whistle that could in all likelihood be retrofitted, in software, to the 4G iPod. What part of that eludes your grasp?

      What is it about the 4th and 5th generation iPods having vastly different system architecture that eludes your grasp?

    8. Re:DRM by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I like this new subject; let's go with it!

      iTunes comes in the box with the iPod. Therefore, he did buy it. The fact that it's also available for free by another method is irrelevant.

      iTunes is part of the product, iTunes got changed detrimentally, therefore the product changed detrimentally. This is clearly morally unacceptable. Do you understand?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he didn't buy it no matter how you try to spin it. Even if he did i'll bet the license says they can do what they did, but that isn't the point. He bought an mp3 player that can still play mp3's just as it could when he bought it.

      But you are still missing the main point. My original point, and the only one I have towards the OP is that his complaint about the new features on the IPOD make no sense. itunes has nothing to do with the point I was making to the OP.

    10. Re:DRM by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      they disabled the product he bought so that it would no longer work. (iTunes 5)

      The product is iTunes, not "iTunes 5." iTunes still works just fine, even with his older iPod..

    11. Re:DRM by Phillup · · Score: 1

      However, my point wasn't about itunes, it was about his ipod and his complaint that they released a new ipod.

      I didn't see him complaining about the release of a new iPod.

      I did see him complaining about how the new features in the new iTunes he is forced to use are of no benefit to him as he has an older iPod.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    12. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      omg, your either the worst troll or really dumb and lazy. Did you actually read what he wrote before you posted that? Did you read my original post because I even quoted him saying what I said he said. Here it is again for you. Please learn to read and don't waste anymore of my time.

      "I can also presume that my 4th Gen iPod Colour will not be able to play the new games. How I love thy, apple...."

    13. Re:DRM by Yvan256 · · Score: 1
      The poster isn't interested in being some corporation's permanent revenue stream. The poster, correctly, reads in Apple's move a bid to get him or her to replace a perfectly fine product with one that has an additional bell or whistle that could in all likelihood be retrofitted, in software, to the 4G iPod. What part of that eludes your grasp?
      Damn you Nintendo! Why do I have to buy a Wii? Why couldn't they make Wii games compatible with my SNES? And why won't Nintendo DS games work on my Gameboy Advance?

      The poster is dumb to assume that his 4th gen iPod has the same internal components as the 5th gen iPod, period. Don't assume that a simple firmware upgrade will magically upgrade the DSP and CPU of an older iPod.

      Hey Apple! Where's my firmware upgrade to add a color screen to my 3rd gen iPod?!?! /sarcasm
    14. Re:DRM by Phillup · · Score: 1

      I can also presume that my 4th Gen iPod Colour will not be able to play the new games. How I love thy, apple....

      I'll take dumb and lazy for the win... but you'll have to look in the mirror to find out who I'm talking about.

      Above, your quote... below... my interpretation:

      I did see him complaining about how the new features in the new iTunes he is forced to use are of no benefit to him as he has an older iPod.

      As someone of slightly more intelligence can see... he is noting that the new features of iTunes (the games) won't work on his older iPod. He is pointing out that 1) he was forced to upgrade to continue using the program 2) the new version does less for him than the old version and 3) none of the new features in the new version are of use to him either.

      He simply wants to use the version he paid for, without any diminished features.

      And... if you go back to his original post for context... you will see this complaint is in regards to being forced to update iTunes... even tho none of the new features are of use to him.

      BTW, take your name calling and shove it up your ass.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    15. Re:DRM by jaydonnell · · Score: 1

      he made two seperate complaints and the second one, which I quoted, was seperate.

      "he is noting that the new features of iTunes (the games) won't work on his older iPod."

      the games are NOT a feature of iTunes.

      Your simply arguing to argue at this point and your forced to make up things to do it. Either that or you've never used an ipod and itunes and have no idea what your talking about. If that's the case you simply shouldn't comment.

  6. Just placed an order for one. by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I went with a black 80 gig model. Not really interested in music, but I now have access to enough space to rip my DVD collection onto.

    The estimated shipping time is currently 3 - 5 days.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  7. How Much Space by neonprimetime · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much can your pocket hold? That's up to you and your iPod. It holds up to 20,000 songs, up to 25,000 photos, and up to 100 hours of video -- or any combination of each.

    If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.

    1. Re:How Much Space by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.

      Hear hear! Tech is boiled down so freaking much for most people, it makes me mad. I can remember having this conversation about 20 times in the late 90's:

      Person: How many songs can you put on a recordable CD?

      ME: CD's hold 80 minutes of music, so it depends on the length of a song.

      Person: But how many songs is that?

      Me:

    2. Re:How Much Space by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny
      If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs
      Don't you ever get tired of listening to American Pie?

      4096x3072 pics
      Honestly, why would you carry a ditigal negative around in your pocket? Images that large are only good as source material for image editing and printed materials. What good is having hundreds of them in your iPod?

      and 3 hour movies
      100 hours of video is 100 hours of video. I think you can do the math to figure out how many movies that is. :)
    3. Re:How Much Space by TheGreek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How much can your pocket hold? That's up to you and your iPod. It holds up to 20,000 songs, up to 25,000 photos, and up to 100 hours of video -- or any combination of each.
      If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.
      Yeah.

      They really should also market the raw capacity in GB on the Apple Store page. Maybe before the number of songs. In bold.
    4. Re:How Much Space by jfengel · · Score: 1

      The really crummy part is the underlying notion that a song is always three minutes long (which is why you should just grit your teeth and say "about two dozen").

      You can't make your songs significantly longer or shorter, or they won't fit into the radio format. No radio, no free advertising. No free advertising, stay in your garage and make whatever music you like but best of luck getting people to listen to it.

    5. Re:How Much Space by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      hell that isn't as bad as today I was looking at ups's and they all had numbers like up to 62 minutes of battery time. How the hell do they know what I'm plugging in to the thing? I can understand giving a number like 60 minutes to give a rough idea, but 62?

      yeah totally offtopic, whatever.

    6. Re:How Much Space by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Well, since some of my favorite bands are things like Yes, Dream Theater, and King Crimson...

      ...I might be able to hold one or two.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    7. Re:How Much Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the 8GB Nano comes in any colour you want; as long as it's black.

    8. Re:How Much Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't make your songs significantly longer or shorter, or they won't fit into the radio format."

      Sure you can...I had a friend chart in the last few years with an almost 7 minute song.

      Ohhhhhh...you mean 'crappy pop music'.

      If you are going to make music in a specific genre, you need to approach it with the same rules as what makes up the genre. For instance, Smoove Jazz isn't going to go for angry distorted three chord guitar over a four four beat...its significantly different than smoove jazz to alienate yourself from the crowd even if you are playing a standard. Same with pop music -- the average listener only wants 3 minute songs. Its wallpaper music. I know artists that will cut a 10 minute song to fill this and in this format, an incredibly deep song can get very banal in the conversion. Again, that is what pop music formats are.

      Knowing that the popular length of music is three and a half minutes, there is no gritting of teeth unless you are a snob and want to prove you listen to a 'better quality of music' than the person asking.

    9. Re:How Much Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paging AKAImBatman... paging AKAImBatman... your sense of humour is at the Lost & Found desk on the main concourse...

    10. Re:How Much Space by rthille · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you can put 99 songs on a CD. No more than that in RedBook format anyway.
      http://www.commonerarecords.com/doubledisc/cdmaste ring/redbookspecs.html

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    11. Re:How Much Space by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Bigger font too.

      Very good reply.

    12. Re:How Much Space by smatthew · · Score: 2, Funny

      hahha - but your ipod only holds 33 of your 3hr long movies. My Ipod holds 66 90 minute movies! So there!

      --
      slashdot username - at - email.domain.name
    13. Re:How Much Space by dwightk · · Score: 1

      how would your preference for "3 hour movies" change what the marketspeak said: "100 hours of video"
      ? ;-P

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    14. Re:How Much Space by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Honestly, why would you carry a ditigal negative around in your pocket? Images that large are only good as source material for image editing and printed materials. What good is having hundreds of them in your iPod?

      Because that's how big the originals are in iPhoto, and they just get synced directly to the iPod?

      You know, that raises an interesting issue: why doesn't Apple add an option to convert all media to smaller sizes as part of the sync? You know, music: ALAC->AAC, photos: 4096x3072->1024x768, video: HD->640x480 (or 320x240). Personally, I think that would be a great idea, especially for the Nano and Shuffle.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:How Much Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason you're posting on slashdot and they're making billions.

    16. Re:How Much Space by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I think it has an option to do just that (Similar to what it does with movies), but given that I haven't used a photo-capable iPod for a while I may be wrong.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    17. Re:How Much Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, plus they should admit the real usable storage capacity and stop calling it "30/80GB ipod". i mean, my 60 GB ipod stores 55 point something GB. Yes, I know it's the same with harddrive manufacturers, but then, harddrives are no consumer goods. And if they mean "Gibibyte" or "Gigabyte", they should say so aswell. Yes, i do think that a Company shouldn't be allowed to to buy a 60 GB harddisk, put it in an mp3-player and market the resulting product as "60GB player".

    18. Re:How Much Space by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It certainly can't do it for music, at least -- I'd love to be able to downsample my Apple Lossless tracks to AAC for my Shuffle...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:How Much Space by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      While they're at it, they could even put the capacity in real GB rather than '1GB=1 000 000 000B' so you don't mysteriously lose 2GB when you plug your '30GB' iPod into your computer.

    20. Re:How Much Space by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Yes photos are stored as ipod sized versions of the ones in Iphoto - you do have the option to copy the full resolution originals to the Ipod but it's not required.

  8. New shuffle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That new shuffle is cute as a button

    You have to give Apple a round of applause. They ALWAYS get the product design right from an asthetic point of view.

    1. Re:New shuffle by BearRanger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best. Tie Clip. Ever.

    2. Re:New shuffle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first attractive looking piece of hardware I've seen from Apple in a while, and I'm tempted to replace my Rio 500 with one... I've got a few questions on it though (if anyone knows the answers):

      1) Is it metal housed?
      2) Is there any means of loading it without using iTunes (on WinXP)? (I hate iTunes; granted I haven't tried 7, but the prior versions have been bloated skipping messes... I tend to just use VLC for playing music)
      3) Is there any means of adding memory to it through SD, etc?

    3. Re:New shuffle by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1
      1. Yes, alumnimum they said. (You can double check in the local Apple store in a few days, I'm sure.)
      2. For the average user I'd say no... But around here I'd say check the web; some people have figured out the directory structure and how to access the 'songs' area of the standard iPods, and I'd assume it is the same here.
      3. Are you kidding? This is Apple! Of course not!
      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    4. Re:New shuffle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might have to see if I can find one of these to mess with... I had a third gen iPod for a few weeks (and sold it), but couldn't stand the touchwheel/pressure button interface since it meant that I always had to be looking at the iPod to operate it, and couldn't pocket it without locking it first (much less operate it while pocketed). This one looks to have a nicely made 5 button interface, and I really like the clip (I've attached a clip to my Rio, in addition to filling it with shoe-repair gel to waterproof it).

      I have a license somewhere to an app called Anapod, which provided very nice file system integration with the old iPod, but I can't remember if it required iTunes to be installed as well; I might have to email them and see if they can turn up my license/tell me if this would work with the new Shuffle.

      The Rio is starting to get dodgy (some distortion and the odd random reset), and I really don't want to be carrying around a mini-HD... the HD based iPod that I briefly had locked all the time, even after I just consigned it to being a car player.

    5. Re:New shuffle by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      There are 3rd party programs for putting music onto (and taking it off in some cases) ipods.
      I know winamp has some limited capability for transferring music to an ipod for instance.

    6. Re:New shuffle by gchang6 · · Score: 1

      In a few years, Apple will come out with earrings that plays like an iPod. You can clip it or pierce it through your ear. No more iPods to dangle around your neck. Then someone will accidentally swallow one and sue the company. Pity...

    7. Re:New shuffle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do not eat iPod shuffle."

    8. Re:New shuffle by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      "Then someone will accidentally swallow one and sue the company."

      Hey! Open your mouth, I love this song.

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    9. Re:New shuffle by NotWorkSafe · · Score: 1

      In answer to your second question, try using EphPod. I find that it works pretty well, and eliminates the need for iTunes.

      --
      There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.
  9. iTunes 7 by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

    I'm not keen on the new icon - now there's too much blue in my dock.

    and it pisses me off how videos doesn't have a section now jus a playlist. but I can't even play iTMS videos yet because you need the new quicktime that isn't on software update yet.

    the cover view is made crappy by not grouping compilations - hence the same album art repeated for different artists.

    so don't bother downloading the .dmg - just wait for software update.

    1. Re:iTunes 7 by godawful · · Score: 1

      it reminds me of itunes 2.0, i think that was the blue icon? i was curious if it would change form green since it has been green from 5.0 on.

      happened to notice requirements (for os x) are up to 10.3.9, whereas itunes 6 only required 10.2.8.

      i've got it determining gapless playback right now, it's been going for ages, but thats what happens with 30K+ songs. can only imaging how long finding missing artwork will take, but thank god that feature is there, as finding artwork is the bane of my music playing existence (despite all the programs that help do it).

      i must admit to being excited about these products, i am actually thinking of replacing my second generation ipod for the first time. and i suddenly find my lack of a mac with a remote to be of the upmost detriment.. gotta get out of this RDF.

      --
      Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
    2. Re:iTunes 7 by Y-Crate · · Score: 1
      and it pisses me off how videos doesn't have a section now jus a playlist. but I can't even play iTMS videos yet because you need the new quicktime that isn't on software update yet.
      Try this
    3. Re:iTunes 7 by nine-times · · Score: 3, Informative

      the cover view is made crappy by not grouping compilations - hence the same album art repeated for different artists.

      It seems it shows you cover art in the order in which your music is sorted. If you're sorting by "Artist", for example, then yes, it will show you the same cover art multiple times if there are multiple artists on the album. That's because it's actually sorting the cover art by artist.

      If you sort by Album, however, I think you'll find that your complaint goes away.

    4. Re:iTunes 7 by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      but if I sort by album then it's all just "random"; who seriously sorts their albums alphabetically by name?

      I'd like by artist and then by year ideally.

    5. Re:iTunes 7 by el_womble · · Score: 1

      You're pissed off that its too blue and that videos don't have a play list?

      How about being treated like a second class citizen and not even being ALLOWED to download movies!

      Its bad enough that I have to put on a californian accent to play chess with my Mac or that the only concession UK Macs have to a UK keyboard is the replacment of # for £ but they insist on slapping us around the face with iTMS.

      First we get to wait over a year to get it at all. Then we got to pay 79p for a track (close to $1.50 - I thought VAT was 17.5%) and so far the closest we have got to the TV Shows and Movies are the Pixar shorts.

      And yet we still buy iPods like our lives depend on it, and no other online music store has come close to iTMS music store! What do we have to do? Draw blood? Invade France? Promise to fine Microsoft 2m a day - oh we're already doing that?

      I suppose it could be worse. I could be Austrailian.

      (I mean that purely from an iTMS perspective, I'm actually concidering being yet another Pom Downunder - sorry)

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    6. Re:iTunes 7 by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess you better start working on that European computer industry you've been slacking off on for the last 40 years.

    7. Re:iTunes 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just go into the tags for the album and select "part of compilation" it won't repeat.

    8. Re:iTunes 7 by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt Apple is the one making the decisions as to which markets it can sell movies to.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:iTunes 7 by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      I did. my point is that setting applies to the browser but not cover view.

    10. Re:iTunes 7 by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at least you see the problem, right? You want to sort by artist, but when you have an album that contains multiple artists, where do you put it? Let's say Album A has songs by both Band X and Band Y. Essentially, you have 3 options:

      1. Separate out the compilations, which means that when you're looking for songs by Band X or Band Y, and you sort by the artist, the songs on this album will not show up under either group. This could be annoying and frustrating.
      2. Have some method to determine whether the album should appear under Band X or Band Y. This would be inconsistent at best, and just as confusing.
      3. Have Album A show up twice, once with Band X and once with Band Y. This means you're likely to find what you're looking for, but the same album art will appear multiple times.

      Personally, I think of those choices, the third is obviously the best. If you have OCD or something than it might offend your sensibilities, but insofar as it's a tool for sorting through your music collection to find something you want to listen to, it just seems like the best option. I guess it also makes sense if you just want to ask for more options in how things are sorted, but if there must be a single way, it seems to me that this is it.

    11. Re:iTunes 7 by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      The cover view is made crappy by not grouping compilations - hence the same album art repeated for different artists.

      That's a matter of ticking the tick box in preferences.

      I _do_ hope the gapless playback works ad advertised - the old workaround, setting the songs to overflow for 0 seconds won't work anymore since the minimum overflow time has been set at 1 second.

    12. Re:iTunes 7 by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Another whinging pom down under, you mean? :-) Good move. I'm a paddy myself, spent a year in Sydney and would LOVE to live in the lucky country again.

    13. Re:iTunes 7 by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess you better start working on that European computer industry you've been slacking off on for the last 40 years.

      Damn straight... because it's not like the europeans don't own the smartphone market (oh wait, they do) or produce any competitors to Microsoft (oh, wait, Linux..)

    14. Re:iTunes 7 by the_rev_matt · · Score: 1

      There's a flag for grouping compilations now. Under the General preference pane.

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

    15. Re:iTunes 7 by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      What do we have to do? Draw blood? Invade France?

      Don't do it! You know how these British invasions of France go. It might fare well in the beginning. Then they'd only dig up some teenaged virgin with a great heaving rack and hysterical visions and kick your skinny arse again. Of course, you could burn her alive, citing Holy Scripture, as all the best pyros do, but you'd soon be driven away, and then you'd have to content yourselves with bossing and occupying, say, the Irish, Indians, Africans and assorted islanders for the rest of the millennium, all before being chopped down to the size of a tail-wagging runt-end adjunct to American oil wars. What a pissload of fun that'd be, mate. No trans-Atlantic hard feelings, now: I just want to spare you the grief.

    16. Re:iTunes 7 by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      How about being treated like a second class citizen and not even being ALLOWED to download movies!

      Don't blame Apple. Blame your own home-grown entertainment industry for not letting Apple distribute the content. If you think Apple DOESN'T WANT to make money off of selling you things, then you're delusional -- even for a Brit!

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    17. Re:iTunes 7 by ttldkns · · Score: 1

      Aha!! there is a new preference! in the general preference pane there is a new tick box "group compilations while browsing"

      Pure pwnage!

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    18. Re:iTunes 7 by Pink+Tinkletini · · Score: 3, Informative

      Click the "Album" column header again. It goes from sorting by "Album," to "Album by Artist," to "Album by Year," then back to "Album."

    19. Re:iTunes 7 by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Highlight the songs in the album, get info on them, and change the "Compilation" field to "Yes." Problem solved?

    20. Re:iTunes 7 by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It will still show you album art by artist. I'd bet they'll introduce some improvements in later versions for sorting, but it makes sense as a way to confront this problem.

      Grouping complications together as an artist "Compilation" is a relatively new feature in iTunes, but even if the coverflow system grouped things the same way, you'd still get some duplicate cover art, because it will still list albums containing artist's songs under that artist. For example, I have a Shins album and the Garden State soundtrack in my iTunes library. If I make iTunes group by Compilation, then there's no "Zero 7" in my artist list, because I don't have any Zero 7 albums. However, if I select the Shins in my artist list, "The Garden State Soundtrack" still shows up.

      And that is what should happen. The reason is, if I'm sorting by artist because I'm looking for a certain Shins song, and I find the Shins, it should show me all of the songs I have in the Library that are performed by the Shins. It shouldn't hide it in Compilations. Unless you tell it to do so-- manually.

    21. Re:iTunes 7 by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Actually, I found another solution as well. Each song in the library has an "Album Artist" field, so you could make it "Soundtrack" or "Compilation", and then sort by "Album Artist". Of course, This will probably work best if you've entered a value for "Album Artist" for everything in your library.

    22. Re:iTunes 7 by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. It was solved by getting compilation albums to have just one "Album Artist". Some times it's "Various Artists" (think soundtracks et al), others it's an actual artist name (Like setting Santana's "Supernatural" to compilation, because most songs are collaborations and you want the collaborating artist in the artist field, but setting album artist to Carlos Santana, because that's the actual artist behind the album)

    23. Re:iTunes 7 by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      FYI, most of NASA's satellite mission control software is written by a top-notch portuguese company (who also happen to work with the european and japanese space agencies). For the most part, software doesn't get much more critical and demanding than that.

    24. Re:iTunes 7 by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      genius, thanks.

      I love it with Apple how frequently you wish you could do something then find out you can with just a couple of clicks.

    25. Re:iTunes 7 by el_womble · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what power you think the BPI has over here, but I assure you its not on the scale of outlawing the sale of digital media on these isles. They may enforce the copyright of the content owners, but Apple are already doing that, its not like thier giving the stuff away.

      In many ways I can't see how setting up the movie store in the UK is any different to openning a DVD store on every high street - something that Apple could do without ever talking to our industrial bodies.

      What this boils down to is Hollywood not wanting to make more money. What never ceases to amaze me is that home grown entertainment isn't allowed to take advantage of this. Brits still make films and I'm sure there are some stuggling independants that would love the opertunity to open their work to the world market, and yet Apple insists on courting nobody but hollywood big boys. What about Bollywood? What about the French, German and Spanish films that still have original plots? Why arn't they available for global release?

      --
      Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  10. Another expensive Christmas by darien · · Score: 5, Funny

    For fuck's sake. I hate giving money to Apple. But now my girlfriend's going to insist on having one of these new iPod Nanos for Christmas. And what really winds me up is that she isn't even going to care about the capacity, or the battery, or the patented scroll-wheel interface, or iTunes integration, or anything like that. She's going to want it because it's blue.

    1. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dump her!

    2. Re:Another expensive Christmas by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't said girlfriend buy it for herself?

    3. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      It means that in September you know what to get her for Christmas, which is better than getting the wrong thing on the 24th and suffering for it afterwards.

    4. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I banged my leg on a coffee table this morning. Want to buy some photos of the bruise for your lady friend?

    5. Re:Another expensive Christmas by GeekGirlSarah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      God forbid someone want to buy something for a reason other than pure performance, huh?

    6. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, dump her. If she's going to want something based on its color rather than it's features, she's just going to end up dumping you for a hotter model. Also, anyone who is that superficial is not worth dating, and is probably also quite dumb, which should matter if you're a true nerd. Though, if you're a true nerd, you probably can't get anyone better. So on second thought, don't dump her. Get everything you can out of her (*cough*sex*cough*) before she dumps you.

    7. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If that's the biggest difference in worldview between you and your girlfriend, I think mayby you should just let it slide. She likes cute gadgets. Apple makes cute gadgets. Buy her a cute gadget from Apple and be happy that she doesn't want big shiny rocks (which cost several times as much) for her Christmas present instead.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Another expensive Christmas by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, do you think any girl that dates a geek has her own money?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    9. Re:Another expensive Christmas by MrFebtober · · Score: 1

      A cheaper route would be to buy some masking tape and some pretty blue paint and "customize" her existing ipod, presuming she already has one that's functional. Try Pep Boys for finding a nice metallic fleck paint. ;-)

    10. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well, the one that's marrying me does. Sugar mama=good.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Another expensive Christmas by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      And give me her number!

    12. Re:Another expensive Christmas by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, when you grow up, you'll understand.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    13. Re:Another expensive Christmas by TCQuad · · Score: 2, Funny

      You feel bad? Try being on a grad student stipend. I feel like a diabetic kid in a candy store.

    14. Re:Another expensive Christmas by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1

      Good point. Shiny rocks have a much lower functionality/dollar rating.

      In fact, the shiny rocks have close to no intrinsic functionality or value.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    15. Re:Another expensive Christmas by burndive · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um... Didn't you read what he wrote: "For fuck's sake"?

      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
    16. Re:Another expensive Christmas by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      In fact, the shiny rocks have close to no intrinsic functionality or value.

      Did you never watch Family Guy?

      "DIAMONDS: She'll Practically Have To."

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    17. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Golias · · Score: 1

      In fact, the shiny rocks have close to no intrinsic functionality or value.

      Unless you value getting laid, that is. ;)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Another expensive Christmas by mlorentz · · Score: 0

      Who wears the pants in this relationship?

    19. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's going to want it because it's blue.

      Well tell her she'll get a blue-job if she gives you a blew-job...

    20. Re:Another expensive Christmas by FooManChu · · Score: 1

      "1000 songs to get in her pockets."

    21. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to buy some bitch diamonds to get laid, you'd be better off going to a prostitute. I mean if you gotta pay, you might as well go to a professional. It'd cost less than diamonds too.

    22. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you overpaid.

    23. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. With that kind of easy-going sense of humor, you must be a big hit with all the ladies!

      Relax, kid. It was obviously joke.

    24. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      This, Sir, is the funniest comment I've read on Slashdot in quite a while. I applaud!

    25. Re:Another expensive Christmas by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      No, that's extrinsic functionality/value.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Another expensive Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My rocks aren't shiny.

    27. Re:Another expensive Christmas by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      That's better than having to buy her a blue Cadillac Escalade... how I wish that was a theoretical example....

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  11. Shocking Interface Change by Hootenanny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I downloaded and installed iTunes 7, I was rather stunned to see the new interface. It doesn't even remotely resemble a standard Mac OS X Aqua application. It looks... well, almost like a gray Windows application. Or a Java application. Yuck. Dear Apple, please bring back the old, standard look and feel. Enough said!

    1. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Mattintosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It looks like Mail.app. That's 10000x better than the all-brushed-metal monstrosity it was before.

    2. Re:Shocking Interface Change by jmc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Where've you been? Brushed metal was ditched with iTunes 6. And none of the cosmetic changes with iTunes 7 bear any resemblance to Mail.app.

      The most noticable difference appears to be the new scollbars. I agree with the original poster -- I don't like them.

      Can we please just get everything looking consistent again Apple? Please? Before you stick Java scollbars on iTunes 7, can we please ditch brushed metal in Finder (and a half dozen other Apple apps that ship with OS X)?

      I mean seriously, OS X is starting to look more frankensteinish than your typical Linux installation. I can count 5 different application "looks" now:

      - iLife (darker, unified toolbar, squared off corners)
      - iTunes 7 (same as iLife, new scrollbars)
      - Mail.app (unified toolbar, lighter than iLife, rounder corners)
      - Safari/Finder/iCal (etc) (brushed metal)
      - TextEdit/Preview (etc) (older non-unified look)

      I love my MacBook Pro, but I'm not sure what happened to that consistency that Macs were supposed to be known for. :(

    3. Re:Shocking Interface Change by generic-man · · Score: 1

      I remember when my Mac-fan friends defended the use of brushed metal for some apps ("Supposed to evoke a hardware device," etc) and plain for others. Then out came GarageBand with its wooden interface, and all the other interfaces Apple introduces on a whim, and all you can do is commiserate with Tog.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Paradox · · Score: 1

      While I agree with the general sentiment, I have to say: "It's just the skin, dude." There is definitely a lot in common between all the iApps, up to the point where it makes sense and generally the lessons learned in one app move to the next. That's aside from the extreme consistency that the OS X environment itself provides. In general, paste works across applications, Drag'N'Drop is supported, context menus and scrolling are handled consistently.

      Would it be nice if all the iApps had a similar look? Yes. Is it more important that they all have a similar "feel"? Yes.

      --
      Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
    5. Re:Shocking Interface Change by _|()|\| · · Score: 1

      I don't mind the look so much, but there is an annoying change in the spreadsheet interface. When you sort by Album, the secondary sort is the new Album Artist column, which is blank for songs that you haven't purchased from the iTMS, and there is no tertiary sort. In other words, all the Greatest Hits you've ripped won't sort properly.

    6. Re:Shocking Interface Change by AhtirTano · · Score: 1
      There are some changes to the interface that I really like.
      1. Clearly separating the library, store, and playlist sections
      2. Having separate music, TV show, movie, and audiobook library sections. I hated the way they were intermingled before
      3. No more twisty-arrow to get to the iTunes shopping cart or purchased list.
      4. The new organizational views are nicer to navigate that the old system, at least visually. They might turn out to be less practical, but I can't be sure until I've tried using them for a while.
      The no gap playback is nice too.

      All that said, I too wish for a more consistent feel.

    7. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Incadenza · · Score: 3, Informative

      Would it be nice if all the iApps had a similar look? Yes. Is it more important that they all have a similar "feel"? Yes.

      OK, please follow me and close the main window by clicking the red button in:
      iTunes - nothing remarkable happens, it is just the window that vanishes
      iDVD - closes the current project, goes to opening screen
      iChat - nothing remarkable happens, it is just the window that vanishes
      iDVD - closes the current project, goes to opening screen
      iPhoto - quits application

      Three types of behaviour in five applications on a principal part of the interface. I wish Apple shared your beliefs.

    8. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Omestes · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is an app out there that will unify all of the OS X apps (even Firefox) with a common skin. It skins them to be a pretty standard OS X-ish feel, a much like Mail.app (w/o unified buttons), exept slightly darker. It also stips the brushed metal from brushed apps. I haven't ran it in awhile, so can't say if it works with the new iTunes. Its called UNO.

      If the interface schizophrenia is getting to you, it might be the best solution, until Apple at least realized that their getting slightly off base with the "a style per app" philosophy. How hard is it to just use some stardardized Aqua on everything? Do individual apps really need to stand out, can function speak for them? I damn well know I'm running iTunes (sound coming from speakers, etc), and don't need it to be styled in such a way to let me know that "yep, thats itunes" when I look at it. Its annoying that they screw up their own standards.

      Sorry for the rant, preaching to the choir.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Omestes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops... /. ate my link:

      http://gui.interacto.net/

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    10. Re:Shocking Interface Change by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "It's just the skin, dude."

      If this is the case I would appreciate being able to set them all to a consistent "skin". Preferably with one setting at the operating system level.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:Shocking Interface Change by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as far as I can tell putting your own movies/tv shows into the right category has to be done one at a time and takes forever.

    12. Re:Shocking Interface Change by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      I couldn't say. I was anal enough to mark all my files as "tv show", "movie", or "music video" while they were all listed together under the "videos" listing, so it was all automatically done for me.

    13. Re:Shocking Interface Change by ickies · · Score: 1

      I'm really curious - what exactly was people's problem with the brushed metal theme? I keep reading people's posts that they're so glad it's gone from iTunes, etc., but I liked it! It matched my iPod Mini. Where does all this backlash come from?

    14. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Trixter · · Score: 1

      I'm with you 100%. Apple has never been good with consistency, all the way back to the original Mac. Drag a file icon in the trash? It gets deleted. Drag a diskette icon in the trash? It gets... ejected. Not erased, or formatted, but ejected. That has NEVER made sense.

    15. Re:Shocking Interface Change by ickies · · Score: 1

      Use Smart Playlists. I've had trouble finding other uses for Smart Folders/lists elsewhere in my mac, but for iTunes it's an incredibly easy way to organize your content.

    16. Re:Shocking Interface Change by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Oh, I do. It would just be nice to be able to easily put things in the actual TV Shows list.

      I generally play by genre and use smart playlists to mix genres.

    17. Re:Shocking Interface Change by oscarmv · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually that's the way it should be. Allow me to explain the reasoning:

      iTunes/iChat: They can keep doing their thing even without any windows around and you will probably use them that way. iTunes will keep playing music, iChat will keep you connected and people might contact you.
      iDVD/iMovie (I assume that was a typo): They are project based. Close the project, go back to the opening screen. There's not much to do with neither app without a project open.
      iPhoto: The window manages the library. Nothing to do without it around. Application quits.

      Hope that helps.

    18. Re:Shocking Interface Change by dangitman · · Score: 1
      I can count 5 different application "looks" now: - iLife (darker, unified toolbar, squared off corners) - iTunes 7 (same as iLife, new scrollbars) - Mail.app (unified toolbar, lighter than iLife, rounder corners) - Safari/Finder/iCal (etc) (brushed metal) - TextEdit/Preview (etc) (older non-unified look)

      How could you forget the "Pro App" look that is used in Final Cut Studio? IMO, the whole OS should be remodelled after that style. It's kick-ass. Beautiful and functional.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    19. Re:Shocking Interface Change by FooGoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's because...are you ready for this? Leopard and Vista are the same OS. just mungified to keep it a secret.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    20. Re:Shocking Interface Change by jmc · · Score: 1

      Almost mentioned that too. Except:

      1) I'm mainly talking about apps Apple ship with OS X.
      2) They at least have a consistent look between them, and I can see the rationalization for having a seperate pro look (ie, smaller widgets).
      3) I rather like the style also. :) I could stare at Logic all day. Err, well, I guess I do...

    21. Re:Shocking Interface Change by jmc · · Score: 1

      Very good point. I have to say, since making the switch, I've never had to hunt for the Preferences/Options/Settings menu in any application.

      I just get annoyed by the inconsistent skins. I know there's no practical gripe to be made, but the nice aesthetics of OS X was part of the reason I made the switch.

    22. Re:Shocking Interface Change by Gyarados · · Score: 1

      Custom interfaces are confusing and make the graphical interface of the host operating system hideous as a whole. I'm baffled by Apple's decision to progressively wreck their formerly beautiful operating system. What a shame.

    23. Re:Shocking Interface Change by robosmurf · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Apple's Pro apps have yet another "look".

    24. Re:Shocking Interface Change by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      Actually that's the way it should be. Allow me to explain the reasoning:

      Well those are some interesting contortions you've done defending the inconsistency, but at the end of the day there is really only one thing to consider. The close window button (red X) should close windows. It should only close windows, and not do anything else. Thats what the close window button does. It does not mean quit, it does not mean new project, it means close window.

      And yes, OS 9 and under were better about this.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  12. Big question... by Dzimas · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is it that we eagerly participate in a mad rush to publicize every single product at every single Apple PR event? No one else *ever* gets that kind of coverage... Imagine Dell or Creative Labs having a similar impact. The cold, hard reality is that the company has its share of flops along with the home runs (like that odd iPod speaker thingy) and they're definitely not a cool and trendy ma & pa shop... yet we treat them like one. I know there stuff is cool, but it's not always the coolest. So why is it that we keep worshiping at the Idol of Jobs?

    1. Re:Big question... by mblase · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it that we eagerly participate in a mad rush to publicize every single product at every single Apple PR event? No one else *ever* gets that kind of coverage.

      Two reasons. One: we love new iPods. and Two: Apple nearly wrote the book on this sort of marketing technique, and we still love to fall for it every single time.

    2. Re:Big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is what'll you see from Dell or Creative next year. Plus, it's fun. We're all into tech around here, right?

    3. Re:Big question... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      No Apple stuff isn't always the coolest, but there stuff is consistently pretty cool, and they mix the coolness with usefulness. If Dell and Creative had as much of a knack for combining shiny+innovative+practical, I think people would get just as excited.

    4. Re:Big question... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, this announcement's kind of significant. Apple's taking a risk here, but if they pull it off, what you're seeing, once all the pieces are in place (such as the "iTV") is an entire reinvention of visual media delibery. That is, this announcement may well be the most radical thing in that field since the VCR and cable television.

      Of course, nobody cares about that, most of the postings here are "OMG! A blue iPod! I so want that!!" Still, this is the forum that brought you "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame."

      iTunes 7, the Movie Store (with the pre-existing TV shows), and the "iTV" (name pending.) Cool. Be interesting to see if Apple can pull it off.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Big question... by weston · · Score: 1

      Imagine Dell or Creative Labs having a similar impact.

      If Dell could lead in making products that are as appealing in this space, then perhaps they might. But they don't. They make stolid, sensible commodity stuff and push the price downward on it. It's good business, and the world can obviously use that, but they don't particularly innovate otherwise, and they generally don't lead.

      Apple, on the other hand, makes stuff that looks cool, they add new features that aren't widespread, and sometimes they invent new stuff outright. They make it easy to use and set up. They care about aesthetics. They don't just introduce stuff, they introduce a *vision*, and people know they're going to deliver, and that's why they get excited.

      Creative is a different case. They obviously hit the mp3 market sooner, and really, if they'd been able to capture aesthetics and had the muscle to create and integrated delivery platform and moxie to project vision, they, among others, could have owned the space before Apple took it in.

    6. Re:Big question... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Because Apple is seen as unique, a company that marries artistic standards with technology. They don't try to sell tech gadgets with engineering names like "Sony XV-53c," they sell lifestyle appliances that get people excited about technology, about interfaces, and about the ways they interact with computers. There's this strange and interesting artistic standard they adhere to, as if their products are modern works of art and not just computers, and so form and aesthetic are just as important as function, and are in fact often intertwined in both their hardware and software products.

      As for a more practical reason, given that iTunes has 80% of the market, Apple is the #1 digital media company right now. Given that the web and digital media are the two driving forces behind technology right now, of course they're going to get a lot of coverage when they update their best-selling nanos and preview a streaming set-top box meant to go in your living room.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    7. Re:Big question... by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1
      I know there stuff is cool, but it's not always the coolest. So why is it that we keep worshiping at the Idol of Jobs?
      How odd. It would seem that you're somehow unfamiliar with the Steve Jobs RDF.
    8. Re:Big question... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      But there is a *reason* for this. As a person who is often an early adopter of technology, and also an Apple fanboy, I can tell you that quite often you buy some new piece of technology, especially bleeding edge tech, and it doesn't "fit into" your lifestyle or doesn't work correctly. You buy something and you just don't end up using it, or it doesn't really work correctly.

      And frankly, I used to sometimes have this problem with Apple. I can't say that I have rave reviews about the QuickTake 200 camera I have. It doesn't have USB, but that isn't it the problem. It uses hi energy lithium batteries (very expensive ones), and it chews through them. It just isn't better than a film camera - so it is no wonder that digital photography didn't really take off until after the cameras improved.

      But Apple today has an excellent track record. Their products really work and I find that I buy them and really get my money's worth. I bought an iPod a long time ago and I still use it all the time. It works better and fits into my life much better than my old Rio 500 player that I had before.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    9. Re:Big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is it that we eagerly participate in a mad rush to publicize every single product at every single Apple PR event? No one else *ever* gets that kind of coverage... So why is it that we keep worshiping at the Idol of Jobs?
      Because Apple has a large number of overly fanatical customers and a large number of "us" (at Slashdot) like to post comments about these suckers. It goes something like this:
      • Apple announces a product.
      • Apple fanatics submit this news to Slashdot.
      • Apple fanatics post comments proclaiming this new product as the coolest thing ever and Dell sucks.
      • Apple fanatics with mod points promote some of the stupider Apple-worshipping comments as "Insightful."
      • Other Slashdot readers are amused by the kind of hype Apple can create. Some will reply to the ridiculous Apple-worshipping comments that have been modded up. This results in long threads and thousands of comments.
    10. Re:Big question... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Who's "we"? Got a mouse in your pocket?

      I like Apple hardware. I think they do a good job with design and engineering. I also happen to like Apple software. It suits my brain. I'm willing to pay the (modest) price premium to get the equipment that suits me.

      What is this about worshipping? This is a business decision for me. If Creative or Microsoft comes out with a compelling alternative (*snort* it's not completely impossible...) then maybe they'll get my money, and my attention.

      Why are you getting so torqued about a marketing campaign? It's just marketing. Ignore it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Big question... by atrocious+cowpat · · Score: 1

      Two reasons.
      One: we love new iPods.
      Two: Apple nearly wrote the book on this sort of marketing technique, and we still love to fall for it every single time.


      I propose THREE:

      Because - nerd or not - most of us like shiny and/or slick. And Apple usually delivers on both. Whether you'd want to use the new devices/software or not: It's always interesting to see what Apple has come up with, no matter if you want to bash, buy or lick their new stuff.


      (But please don't eat Shuffle!)

      --
      sig? Oh, that sig...
    12. Re:Big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "We're all individual!"

      "We're all sheep!"

    13. Re:Big question... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      When Mythtv has support for the "iTV", I'd buy one or maybe two. Here's hoping it uses a standard protocol.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    14. Re:Big question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >"We're all individual!"
      >"We're all sheep!"

      "We promise not to repeat things other people say!"

    15. Re:Big question... by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      "No one else *ever* gets that kind of coverage"

      It seems that every time Microsoft sneezes there's 32 articles here, although 24 are dupes. We see breathless coverage of the Vista Beta progress to RC1 all through the media, and Slashdot mirrors that with threads for each major new announcement. Linux fares just as well - whenever a major distro releases a new version there's some announcement.

      Apple's flops are also pulled apart here. The coverage is pretty much unbiased when you take the wide variety of opinions into account. Still, it's a company that's had its share of time on the business rollercoaster and it's actually kind of interesting to follow it.

      Contrast to Dell, which can never seem to excite anyone, or HP which is notable in the past decade mainly for management issues and not products.

      I don't see a Slashdot groupthink about Apple or Jobs - there's not enough consensus for that. It's just interesting stuff that happens in the tech sector.

  13. iTV by Damek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looking forward to this - but the big question will be, can you import video, or does it all have to come from iTunes Music Store? Namely, will Apple support via iTunes, just as they do for CDs, importing DVDs? Because a set top box that can only play video from an iTunes-bearing computer is relatively useless in comparison with Tivo/DVR/EyeTV/whathaveyou. Combine your standard cable company's DVR box with EyeTV and you can get any video you want on your Mac mini. No need for an "iTV" then. I guess if they just want to make it easy for people to get their iTunes videos onto their TV screen, that'll be good for most, but I would hope they at least provide some advanced functionality.

    1. Re:iTV by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you will be able to play your home videos in MP4 format and probably recorded shows from EyeTV, but DVD-ripping software still isn't legal.

    2. Re:iTV by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      The set-top box is looking pretty nice (component and HDMI video output). Makes me wonder if it has the horsepower to decode HD material. If so, then it may work it's way to the top of my wishlist when it's released.

      With an HDMI port, I'd say that's a good bet. Now, will it have DVR capability?

      Aye, there's the rub.
      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    3. Re:iTV by bigpat · · Score: 1

      The set-top box is looking pretty nice (component and HDMI video output). Makes me wonder if it has the horsepower to decode HD material. If so, then it may work it's way to the top of my wishlist when it's released.

      I'd also be interested in the types of peripherals that might get released for this. Maybe have CableCARD 2.0 and/or over the air HDTV tuner as a peripheral? Then you have the ultimate little box for all your tv needs.

      Or maybe they just jump right to OpenCable which would keep peripheral costs down and allow them to integrate cable or satellite content.

    4. Re:iTV by bagboy · · Score: 1

      I made a suggestion that they rename it to "I-Candy".

    5. Re:iTV by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      The description on engadget made it sound like it's more like the media center extenders that are available for Windows machines. There is no local storage in the device--it streams the data from another machine via WiFi. So this more or less rules out the possibility of using it as a DVR. However, as with all things Apple, they'll hopefully get it right with Rev 2.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:iTV by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      $299 is not going to fly especially with such limited studio support.

    7. Re:iTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd imagine it's just a glorified Front Row frontend. As it is, Front Row will have access to all music in the "Music" folder, Pictures in iPhoto, and videos in the "Movies" folder. /*you can just put an alias to an external drive or server with videos on it inside the "Movies" folder to give Front Row access*/ You'll have to rip the DVDs yourself (http://handbrake.m0k.org), but I'm sure iTV will be able to play them as outlined above - it shouldn't be limited to iTMS content.

    8. Re:iTV by kherr · · Score: 1

      Now, will it have DVR capability?

      Seems doubtful. It's a router, not a server. It gets the content from the network, like from your video server on your LAN. Compare to how the AirPort Express works, streaming music through itself. The iTV looks like it has a fancier version of Front Row, which does the remote polling of content. Kind of like how iTunes and iPhoto now work with shared libraries.

      I want to know if the component out is YPbPr or RGB. I'm hoping it's not RGB, but the picture of the ports shows them colored that way. Blah.

    9. Re:iTV by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

      It looks like it will be an appliance that will simply stream video wirelessly from any Mac or Windows system with iTunes.

      But, since you can absolutely import any video you wish (including, say, ripped DVDs) into iTunes, there's no reason you wouldn't be able to play any media you wished.

      This is likely for people that DO NOT already have some kind of media center or EyeTV/EyeHome/DVR setup: the target for this isn't people who already have made the leap to having full-fledged computer systems in their living room. The target for this is the same as for AirPort Express: not people who build an MP3 and media station computer in their living room. People who want to plop down a device, hook the A/V outputs up to their TV and entertainment system, use an assistant (like AirPort Express) to set it up, and it's ready to play media they download/import on their computer/laptop/etc. elsewhere in the house.

      No second whole computer in the living room. This is, essentially, an AirPort Express for video (and yes, I know it's not exactly like an AirPort Express, but its functionality in the context of video and the living room can be summed up that way).

      There probably will be *some* advanced or interesting functionality, but it looks like this is more or less an appliance designed to play video content downloaded to iTunes on a remote computer via a Front Row-like interface. But yes, you will be able to add your own video content, since you can do that with iTunes now. The only requirement is that it be some format QuickTime understands.

    10. Re:iTV by Dhrakar · · Score: 1

      From the blogs, it looks like the iTV actually does none of the decoding itself. I think that the host system does all the translation/formatting/etc and then just beams the signal over to the iTV via 802.11. Based on the size and the fact that the power brick is built in to the unit, I really doubt that it even has a HD in it (probably just some RAM for buffering). This way too, I'd bet that it is dead silent. So your computer can be on the other side of the house but you don't have to listen to it while watching movies from it. Pretty cool I think.
          Another interesting question is: can 1 PC or Mac stream video to more than 1 iTV at a time? If so, can it stream different movies to different boxes? Hmmm...

    11. Re:iTV by nine-times · · Score: 1

      We won't know for sure about the iTV until it's out, but if it's any indication, Front Row and and iTunes can play any video that Quicktime can play.

    12. Re:iTV by blibbler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iTunes can handle any video Quicktime can. You can even instruct iTunes to convert this video to an H264 that recent iPods can play. As far as I am aware, this has been the case for as long as iPods have been able to play video.
      Ripping DVDs is still illegal in the USA which is Apple's biggest market. If you do the ripping, you can add the DivX (or another quicktime supported format/codec) of a DVD to iTunes.

    13. Re:iTV by hcob$ · · Score: 1

      Correction, it's only illegal if you don't have a license on the DRM ;)

      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    14. Re:iTV by itsdapead · · Score: 1
      I made a suggestion that they rename it to "I-Candy".

      Well, if they want to use the name iTV in the UK they'll have to buy off (or just buy) these guys first. Well, better Jobs than Murdoch...

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    15. Re:iTV by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the Airport Express is a push device...iTunes pushes music to it.

      This thing is supposed to Pull media from iTunes and display it...my question comes as: What happens if it find two or three instances of iTunes accessible via bonjour? Will it display the content from all three?

      That would be cool.

    16. Re:iTV by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      You might be able to add storage via USB, it has a USB port. Just a thought.

      Right now though we don't have any real specs for it, other than what was shown at the keynote, so "it has no storage" may be untrue.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:iTV by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      No such thing was said at the keynote. The blogs were buzzing before the presentation with a "leaked" agenda that referred to a "TubePort" device which connected via a wireless link between a USB dongle and the device itself. The entire agenda turns out to be a hoax, and TubePort has no resemblance with iTV.

      Given iTV supports Airport, it's improbable that it does none of the decoding itself. Raw, uncompressed, 640x480, 24fps video would saturate all existing and proposed 802.11 standards. The available evidence, including the wide variety of ports on the back, is that this is a stripped down computer, not a dumb device.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:iTV by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can also rip the DVD directly to H.264 with Handbrake and skip the second encoding.

      I expect the iTV to support the same codecs the iPod does: H.264, MPEG-4, MP3, AAC, Apple Lossless, AIFF, and WAV.

    19. Re:iTV by ickoonite · · Score: 1

      Of course it will. This is Apple we're talking about.

      iqu :D

    20. Re:iTV by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      True, true...

      I will probably end up buying a mini as a dedicated "server" for this using my 3TB media storage as a nice place to drop my movies and iTV as a frontend.

      I love mythTV, I use it now to record stuff..but I want a nice quiet, well designed client to hook up to my TV...not a pc.

    21. Re:iTV by amper · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But, since you can absolutely import any video you wish (including, say, ripped DVDs) into iTunes


      As yet, I have not seen anything telling us definitively whether or not we will be able to rip copys of previously purchased DVD's for playback on an iPod. Should this capability exist, *then* I'll get excited. As it is, I can't see paying 10-15USD for a movie that's less quality than a current DVD.

      After all, as SJ has been telling us all for years, why would anyone want to watch a movie on a 2" screen?

      Give me full DVD quality and full 5.1 sound at that price (along with the requisite output capability from the iPod), and now you're on to something.
    22. Re:iTV by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      $300 is nothing. The mini is now $600. Half the price of the mini, for what appears to be basically a mini with no storage devices, and a useful TV-out? Quite reasonable. Assuming it's got a core solo in it, not a bad little box for the price at all. It would even be attractive to linux-heads, who might consider putting linux on it instead, and using it for a mythtv playback box; the pvr functionality can be in a closet somewhere, leaving one small quiet box in your living room.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:iTV by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Informative

      As yet, I have not seen anything telling us definitively whether or not we will be able to rip copys of previously purchased DVD's for playback on an iPod.

      That's because it's not "legal" in many jurisdictions, including the US.

      I wasn't saying that iTunes or iTV would do this; what I'm saying is that it's definitely going to be technically possible, and in fact it's possible right now, in one step, with tools like:

      http://handbrake.m0k.org/

      But it won't be iTunes itself that does it for you; you'll still have to rip it with another tool first, such as HandBrake. But you can then certainly import into iTunes, play via iTV, or put on your iPod (and you can put it into iTunes and sync it to your iPod today).

    24. Re:iTV by the+phantom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, I hate being dyslexic sometimes. On first read through, I read "set-top box" as "sex-bot top."

    25. Re:iTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume wrong; it's probably a 300MHz MIPS and a video decoder.

    26. Re:iTV by Phillup · · Score: 1

      but DVD-ripping software still isn't legal

      In some backwater countries.

      Others are... what is the word I'm looking for... Oh yeah... FREE to do as they want with the things they pay for.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    27. Re:iTV by rthille · · Score: 1

      There's no input suitable to make it a DVR. At least that's what I'm seeing. I guess the connections could switch-hit, but hookups would be a bitch. I guess it _does_ have USB, so you could hookup an EyeTV and an external HD, but I doubt it...
      More likely, you'd use another box to digitize & store your content and send it to the box over the net.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    28. Re:iTV by sdamberger · · Score: 1

      This is going to be great for my wife's collection of DVDs and CDs. A simple remote, a large hard drive, iTV and iTunes on the PC. No more struggling with the DVD player which sometimes plays those foreign DVDs/CDs and sometimes rejects them. I'm looking forward to this!

    29. Re:iTV by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      I'd have said that the big question was what will Apple call it in the UK ?

      We already have an ITV

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITV

    30. Re:iTV by aonaran · · Score: 1

      A good comparison would be to MythTV
      your Mac = the Myth Backend/Frontend
      Your iTV = your Myth Frontend (like a hacked Xbox is to MythTV)

      You can record or import on the backend, you can only playback on the frontend.

    31. Re:iTV by TinyManCan · · Score: 1
      Now, will it have DVR capability?

      Certainly not. I doubt apple will ever sell a DVR type solution.

      Instead, Apple wants you to cancel your cable/tv/satelite subscription and download all your TV, Movies and music from the iTunes store.

      The interesting part is that it may actually end up being cheaper, and there would eventually be more instant-access content.

      Its going to be interesting to see if Apple can become a supplier of all Music, TV, Radio (podcasts) and Movies to a significant percentage of the worlds population. They have as good, or better, of a shot at it than any other company right now, but we all know how fast things can change in the technology world. One thing is sure, with Jobs Disney connection, and Apples hardware they are going to be a tough combo to beat.

    32. Re:iTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why people seem obsessed with ripping DVDs. Sure, it'd be more convenient, and would fit neatly into the whole puzzle, but the fact of the matter is that a company like Apple just isn't going to take the legal risk. At best, they might be able to negotiate studio by studio agreements.

      However, I could certainly see the possibility for streaming videos to an iTV from a physical disc placed in a DVD drive on a computer. While hardly ideal or convenient, it would mean one fewer box to clutter up the living room. I'm not sure if there's much demand, but it'd be a nice extra.

    33. Re:iTV by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      No Seriously, its a MacBook Pro.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    34. Re:iTV by admactanium · · Score: 1

      currently on the ipods with video you can put video files from any source on there. i have stuff that i've converted from my eyetv to ipod format and stuck it on there. seems to work fine. so i don't see them limiting that function in the future. just like they don't limit the ipod to music bought only from the itunes music store.

    35. Re:iTV by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      so you're suggesting that they add a hard drive through USB, then add tuners through USB, then add software to the menus to enable recording? I think not.

      The iTV is a dumb head that receives content from an iTunes server. The PC is what would be used for recording (except Apple doesn't do that itself). Get video into iTunes and the iTV can play it.

    36. Re:iTV by sidb · · Score: 1

      The only requirement is that it be some format QuickTime understands.

      I hope that's the case. But it's possible that the bits streamed to the reciever will be the compressed video file, not the rendered pixels. This is especially likely if they ever allow real HD resolutions -- there just isn't enough bandwidth, even with 802.11n, to do reliable HD streaming in real-world conditions with other networks and traffic around, from what I understand. If they do stream compressed video, you will have to re-encode everything to one of their "blessed" resolutions and codecs beforehand, much like is currently required to play videos on an iPod.

    37. Re:iTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The iTV is a dumb head that receives content from an iTunes server.

      You're fired.

      - Steve.

      (What, you mean you don't work for Apple? Oh, from the way you're going on, I thought you actually knew something about the iTV. Clue: it's not a "dumb head")

    38. Re:iTV by Fengpost · · Score: 1

      Yap, it looks like an embedded system with ARM 9 or 11 or MIPS 32 in it. That would be the cheapest solution on the block! At $299, Apple is making a killing on it!

      --
      The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
    39. Re:iTV by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I don't think any company would care ripping for strict personal use. Legally they care but in real life?

      I still buy original Audio CDs , listen to them once, unless they are classical or jazz, I rip them to AAC, others I use "lossless".

      What would bother companies is , if I start up a file sharing application and distribute them to everyone on internet.

      Speaking about Mac community, majority of people who use "ripping" are people who OWN the original DVD and just want to archive it or watch on their device (not just iPod). That is why those developers (most of them freeware) aren't investigated by MPAA etc. Remember, whole Hollywood uses macs and they know/use versiontracker site and its top 10 listing. ;)

    40. Re:iTV by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It depends on what formats it supports. If it's intended to do more than basic MPEG2 and MPEG4 then it has to have vastly more CPU and a dedicated video decoder won't help you. Frankly, it doesn't make sense for it to work the way you describe for two reasons. First, they have already designed the mini, so taking the hard drive and DVD-ROM out of the box, as well as giving it only a small amount of memory could very likely bring it down to price. Second, they wouldn't have to design a new system, just a new case. Third, they have an HDMI connector which implies that they want to support full-HD. However, Apple doesn't make a computer capable of recompressing HD video down to something that can reliably be streamed over WiFi in realtime. You'd need dedicated hardware on the host/server end as well in order to support anything that the hardware decoder can't already handle. A lot of the time, it makes vastly more sense to use general-purpose computing hardware.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Apple + TiVo - never gonna happen? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    I guess apple and TiVo won't be pairing up to offer iTunes support. Bummer. I thought there was some rumor they were talking about it at one point.

    1. Re:Apple + TiVo - never gonna happen? by Incongruity · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the rumor that Apple would buy TiVo? Well, either way, it's still just as much (or little) of a possibility inasmuch as the iTv doesn't appear to have any inputs (other than the network connections), so it's a different beast than a TiVo so interoperability is not out of the question, one might think.

  15. iTV by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    The set-top box is looking pretty nice (component and HDMI video output). Makes me wonder if it has the horsepower to decode HD material. If so, then it may work it's way to the top of my wishlist when it's released.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  16. iTunes Browse-Album Mode by Shuh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use the scroll-wheel on your mouse to browse those albums. MMMmmmm, tasty!

    1. Re:iTunes Browse-Album Mode by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      Even better, use the two-finger scrolling on your Powerbook/MacBook trackpad!

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  17. Kinda Underwhelming, no? by supremebob · · Score: 1

    After hearing all the rumors of an iPod cell phone and widescreen video iPods, the actual product announcements seem quite unimpressive. It seems like the only product that got a major redesign was the Shuffle, with everything else being minor enhancements.

    Sure, cheaper iPods with more storage and battery life are a good thing, but I didn't really see anything that wanted me to upgrade my existing MP3 player.

    1. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by Carthag · · Score: 1

      I don't remember if there was such a thing in the last iTunes update, but this one has an "iTunes Phone Driver" if you go look in the custom install.

    2. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by TrentC · · Score: 1

      After hearing all the rumors of an iPod cell phone and widescreen video iPods, the actual product announcements seem quite unimpressive.

      And people wonder why Steve Jobs hates the rumor sites...

    3. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 1, Informative

      that's for the iTunes phones. Motorola's ROKR, the RAZR v3i ...

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
    4. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      After hearing all the rumors of an iPod cell phone and widescreen video iPods, the actual product announcements seem quite unimpressive.

      Completely and totally underwhelming was my response to the announcements. Who cares about iPods? Where are the Core 2 Duo Macbook Pros?
    5. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iPod cell phone is a terrible idea. People expect a lot from a cell phone, and the competition in that area is really quite ruthless. I don't know why so many people expect an "iPhone" to happen. It's much smarter for Apple to just keep partnering on iTMS-enabled phones.

      Widescreen video iPod makes sense, but it's hard to get decent battery life when you're running a hard drive and brightly lighting a big LCD and decoding H.264 all at the same time. Basically, they need to ditch the hard drive on the Video iPod. Which will surely happen eventually, but for at least a year. Switching to OLED might also help, but it seems right now OLED just isn't good enough for a video player.

    6. Re:Kinda Underwhelming, no? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Amazing. The rumors about what may come out next renders what DOES come out unimpressive. What a staggering revelation. I wonder if this is why Jobs wishes to contain the rumor mill?

      Come on. You listened to the rumors. You know the track record of the rumor mongers. You drew the wrong conclusions. What did you expect? Matter transmission? Wireless power delivery? Get some perspective.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  18. Games SDK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no word on where these iPod games came from or how they were developed. I never saw any SDKs released for this new iPod capability, even under NDA. I wonder, are these games J2ME apps? Where's the SDK?

    If this new iPod can run J2ME games, there's a truckload of stuff you can get w/o going thru iTunes and paying five bucks per game.

  19. Another Settop Box by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this one does slightly better, eh?

    Interesting that they did a preview of a product they’re not ready to formally announce yet. Rather uncharacteristic. I guess they feel their hand is being forced. Perhaps they’re trying to steal thunder from Vista Media Center Edition or whatever it’s called? You’d think they’d at least finalize the name, though. Really odd.

    Or maybe they’re trying to convince the other movie houses that they’re really serious about this and that the public is interested enough.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Another Settop Box by mblase · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting that they did a preview of a product they're not ready to formally announce yet. Rather uncharacteristic

      It's been pointed out that the only reason most iTMS users would buy full-length movies online is so they could watch them on their TV set. Since DVD burning isn't an option (yet?), Apple had to announce their intended set-top box to give the movie announcement some real weight..................

    2. Re:Another Settop Box by piggy · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're trying to convince the other movie houses that they're really serious about this and that the public is interested enough.

      I think that this has to be the main purpose. Starting with Disney and related studios is good, but it was almost a given with Jobs's relationship. They need to convince the other studios that it isn't as risky as they seem to think -- and will be profitable.

      But the other purpose is to prove to the potential consumer of movies via iTMS that they are serious. If a customer feels that he or she will have the potential for additional value with their iPods and the "iTV", they may be more likely to gravitate to the iTMS than the Amazon.com store. Of course, this indirectly convinces more studios, which convinces more customers, so the two purposes are certainly intertwined.

    3. Re:Another Settop Box by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Interesting that they did a preview of a product they're not ready to formally announce yet. Rather uncharacteristic. I guess they feel their hand is being forced. Perhaps they're trying to steal thunder from Vista Media Center Edition or whatever it's called?

      Their hand was forced by the nature of the products/service they are announcing. If they announce movie downloads for sale, but no way to get them from the computer to the TV every article would be calling their offering DOA. This way, they provide all the necessary components, even if one of them is not available quite yet. They aren't too worried about competing with Windows media center, because it is missing that part of the picture. Windows media center serves the watching TV on a computer crowd. This is aiming for the regular TV crowd, that also has a mac, or might be considering one.

      You'd think they'd at least finalize the name, though. Really odd.

      I have a theory about that. iTV is a pretty obvious name, but if they started researching they'd quickly see EyeTV, pronounced the same, already has recognition in the related digital recorder market for macs. So either they noticed that late in the game or perhaps they are in talks with the creators of EyeTV. For that matter, they might be acquiring them and adding them to the lineup to fill in another missing chunk of their offerings.

    4. Re:Another Settop Box by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Interesting that they did a preview of a product they're not ready to formally announce yet. Rather uncharacteristic. I guess they feel their hand is being forced. Perhaps they're trying to steal thunder from Vista Media Center Edition or whatever it's called? You'd think they'd at least finalize the name, though. Really odd.

      I don't think that's the case. What Apple appears to be doing is dropping a huge hint in terms of how they expect the whole downloadable visual media thing to work.

      Before the announcement, most people were talking about "downloadable movies" in terms of watching them on iPods. This was seen by most people as completely ridiculous, even assuming a "video iPod" was just around the corner with a larger screen. So the talk moved towards the idea that perhaps you were supposed to watch the movies on your laptop, or hook up a video card to your computer that would pipe the output to a TV. These are all ugly options for various reasons, and they certainly take away from the idea of this as more than a gimmick.

      Now imagine the year 2010. You have broadband in common with 95% of the country. You flop in front of the TV, and select the program you want to watch and watch it. The programs come from a variety of sources: free video blogs, CNN newscasts available on a subscription basis, serials available on a subscription basis, free sample pilots, plus movies you're either renting or downloading.

      How are you doing this?

      With the products Apple announced today (and some its already announced.) That's how. You already could buy TV shows from Apple. You can now buy DVDs, and (once Jobs and the studios work something out) the chances are that movies on a PPV basis will probably be available too. The other thing necessary is the TV, the whole "flop on the couch" thing, and that's iTV.

      They couldn't have announced the products they did today without announcing iTV. The question isn't why they pre-announced the iTV today, it's why they announced the movie store today without the iTV being ready.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Another Settop Box by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're trying to convince the other movie houses that they're really serious about this and that the public is interested enough.

      I'd vote for this reason. Apples negotiations with the movie studios was pretty public and is still unresolved. If they get any traction with movies like they did with music then the studios will have to listen.

      In my mind a huge content delivery war is on the horizon. You have cable companies doing ondemand, apple with this new device, possibly the xbox360/ps3 with something similar, plus the traditional dvd players. Cable is best positioned to win (ugh!), but only time will tell.

    6. Re:Another Settop Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does this fit into the whole HDTV thing? It will be a while before there is enough bandwidth to support a download of a 25 GB movie or TV show.

    7. Re:Another Settop Box by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Now if apple buys tivo...they would be in a very strong position to take over. But I think apple thinks that tivo is a stopgap before true (itunes-based) video on demand takes over.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    8. Re:Another Settop Box by monopole · · Score: 1

      Funny, I'm doing this each night w/ my PC. Been doing it for years. Not an apple in sight.

    9. Re:Another Settop Box by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1
      It's been pointed out that the only reason most iTMS users would buy full-length movies online is so they could watch them on their TV set. Since DVD burning isn't an option (yet?), Apple had to announce their intended set-top box to give the movie announcement some real weight..................


      Well in that case, it seems that CinemaNow.com has Apple beat. It already offers DVD burning (and obviously destroys Apple when it comes to selection, at the moment). The prices are cheaper too. So DVD burning isn't the issue.

      The iTV box allows one to store multiple movies in his iTunes library such that they're immediately ready for watching on a TV. Like a movie jukebox. (Not innovative by any stretch; Media Center Extenders allow the same thing, and the movies don't have to be in any particular app's "library". You just designate the one or more directories that are to be browsable for videos, and you can play any video in those directories on the TV.)
      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    10. Re:Another Settop Box by bnenning · · Score: 1

      Funny, I'm doing this each night w/ my PC. Been doing it for years. Not an apple in sight.

      Me too, although my PC is a Mac mini. But this isn't about us, it's about normal humans who understandably have little interest in assembling disparate pieces of hardware and software.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  20. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm looking at the option of getting a mini music player, and iPod seems to be the way to go. With Apple's reputation of doing things well, i'll bet it'll be a high quality piece of hardware as easy to use as ever.

    And i always thought Sony could have done it. Oh well.

    1. Re:Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Might as well wait for this latest one though. It sounds quite nice.

  21. No movie burning? Meh by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That was the make or break for me. I could deal with a $10 movie price as long as I could burn the movie to DVD and watch it on TV.

    Without it - sorry, folks, but I'll wait.

  22. Baby Steps by TheWoozle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, at $14.99 the movies are too expensive. But the new set-top box is a promising step in the right direction. That plus a Mac Mini look like a nice, quiet, unobtrusive presence in the living room. Notice that the box has HDMI out - possible hi-def videos in the future?

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
  23. Oooh, shiny! by mblase · · Score: 1

    Apple also posted Quicktime videos of their new "iPod nano rave" commercials. Tres trippy.

  24. iTunes v6 FairPlay DRM crack fixed? by Nrbelex · · Score: 1

    I wonder if iTunes version 7 fixed the iTunes v6 FairPlay DRM crack. Has anyone tried it?

  25. Just one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It looks like they used powerpoint for that presentation?

    1. Re:Just one thing by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. Moron.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    2. Re:Just one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I give up, can someone explain the joke here?

    3. Re:Just one thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs would never use Powerpoint. Rumor has it that Keynote is his personal brainchild. Keynote is a replacement for Powerpoint, which sucks very badly - especially on OS X.

  26. Blow by blow? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Putting "Blow by blow" and "Steve Jobs" in one sentence really wasn't a good idea.

    1. Re:Blow by blow? by Tyger · · Score: 1

      Sure you're not thinking Steve Ballmer there?

    2. Re:Blow by blow? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      He's probably thinking of the good time he could have with $200 and a weekend in Vegas.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    3. Re:Blow by blow? by saddino · · Score: 1

      Serisouly, that's innuendo up the woz.

  27. Lovely! by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's some much appreciated updates in iTunes, speaking for myself at least...the album art was something I had to do in external programs (Tag & rename for instance).

    But, I've noticed the installer mentioned something about a "Software updater" (or equivalent in English) for iTunes & QuickTime - have they finally solved the full-install download for each version revision I wonder? I guess we won't know for sure until there's an update.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Lovely! by _|()|\| · · Score: 1
      the album art was something I had to do in external programs

      Apple seems to have learned its lesson from the mini-store incident. Not only does iTunes ask before uploading information to Apple, it gives you something in return.

    2. Re:Lovely! by EuroChild · · Score: 1

      If memory serves correctly, this download is substantially smaller than previous versions, especially on the PC side of things in which quicktime was bundled with every iTunes download - and that's a pretty hefty download for someone on dial-up. So, it certainly looks like something was done.

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
  28. This is lame by dangermouse · · Score: 5, Informative
    I sort of assumed that when Jobs said you could transfer music between iTunes libraries using the iPod, he meant all of your music. Nope.

    Music and media not purchased from the iTunes store only syncs one way, from your computer to your iPod.

    I know this is not new, but enabling this functionality for iTMS tracks only is a real dick move.

    1. Re:This is lame by hkb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Which part of (mentioned in iTunes 7 Help):

      http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=300 173

      did you not understand?

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    2. Re:This is lame by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      No, parent is right.

      You can only synch iTunes purchased music between computers. You can't sync the rest of your libary using iTunes.

      The key word is 'sync'. That help doc you reference is for moving, one time, all your music from an old computer to a new computer. The assumption is you will no longer be using the old computer.

      If the only music you have in iTunes is music purchased from the iTMS, then you can keep two computers iTunes libraries in sync. But iTunes still won't let you keep music from other sources in sync. (There's a couple of ways to do it manually, but that's not the parent's point).

      For example, I have a music library in iTunes and an iPod. Most of it is my own ripped CDs, with some iTMS purchases. I have both a work and a home computer. I cannot keep my music library snychronised between these two computers using my iPod - I have to manually add any ripped music to both iTunes libraries. iTunes7 just means my iPod will now at least keep my iTMS purchases synchronized. But it's a low blow to enable it from iTMS content and not for the rest of the libary.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    3. Re:This is lame by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      I understood all of it, guy. Which part of this did you not understand?

      It's not even close to the same functionality. I don't want to store a single library on the iPod, which both machines use. I want two libraries on separate machines, and I want to use the iPod to shuttle tracks between those two libraries. You can now do that in iTunes 7, but only with tracks you've bought from iTMS.

    4. Re:This is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this is not new, but enabling this functionality for iTMS tracks only is a real dick move.

      If you didn't buy it on iTunes, you must have the CD, right?

    5. Re:This is lame by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do. What's your point?

    6. Re:This is lame by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1
      I have to manually add any ripped music to both iTunes libraries. iTunes7 just means my iPod will now at least keep my iTMS purchases synchronized.

      Like that's the hardest thing in that world.

      But it's a low blow to enable it from iTMS content and not for the rest of the libary.

      Yeah, who wouldn't like to copy everything off any arbitrary iPod to any arbitrary iTunes library with one drag and drop.
    7. Re:This is lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think their point (the comments that disagree with you) is that they like Steve Jobs's dick. It is a real dick move.

    8. Re:This is lame by hkb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I understood all of it. What exactly are you bitching about then? The page you reference doesn't mention ANY of the capabilities you want. Auto-Sync is one way.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    9. Re:This is lame by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      Wow, what constructive criticism and insight.

      It's a problem when you have 20 or 30GB of music. USB2, from a portable harddrive? That takes time.

      Synching is faster. Much faster.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    10. Re:This is lame by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1
      Wow, what constructive criticism and insight.
      Allow me to rephrase then: "Stop your whining."

      It has taken me years to rip my CDs ... I can put up with 5 or 10 minutes here or there. I bet you can too. :-P
    11. Re:This is lame by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      30GB from portable hard drive via USB to laptop hard drive is > 5-10mins.

      And at no point was I whining. I was pointing out to the parent poster that iTunes does not, in fact, do what he thought it did, and that the grandparent was correct in his interpretation of iTune's features.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    12. Re:This is lame by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      holy shit. I will read the interweb for you.

      From the page I referenced:

      Throw it in reverse

      Now you can sync everything you buy on the iTunes Store back to any authorized computer.

      See that? See how it says you can sync stuff back to a computer? From the iPod? Do you need some sort of picture with an ipod and a computer and an arrow from the ipod to the computer that says "BACK" over it, in order to make that clearer?

      Hey check it out, I will even follow links for you. This right here is from the page to which the word "back" links:

      SYNC BOTH WAYS

      ...

      But what if you want to hear that song at work? Now you can, with reverse sync. Connect your iPod to any authorized computer -- iTunes lets you authorize up to five -- and you can sync everything you purchased from the iTunes Store back to it.(1)

      ...

      1. Music and media not purchased from the iTunes store only syncs one way, from your computer to your iPod.

      Okay? Do you understand now that Apple has added a new feature, which they call reverse sync, which allows you to sync in a reverse fashion (ie back, ie from an iPod to a computer)? Do you further understand that this is a new feature in iTunes, and that it does not involve manually copying files to your iPod, mounted as a disk? Is it clear now, to you, that this is not the same functionality as that to which you so snidely directed me, a person who is frankly your better, if only in the realm of reading comprehension?

      Is there anything else I can help you with? Are you able to follow the news without assistance? Would you like me to read to you some instructions for tying your damn shoelaces, and perhaps walk you through the diagrams? Perhaps it would be better to direct you to a literacy program, which is a place where you can learn to read (ie teach a man, namely you, to fish rather than give the man, that's you again, an actual fish which will feed him only once)? Seriously, how can I best help you, here? Because I am here to help.

    13. Re:This is lame by MochaMan · · Score: 1

      It is possible to recover music from your iPod, just not supported. I suppose Apple is getting pressure from the recording industry to not enable this functionality, but a little google searching will turn up five or six apps each for Mac and Windows.

      My laptop died a horrible death the other day due to me stupidly checking it in my luggage on an overseas flight. I picked up a new machine on the weekend, and got my entire collection back off my iPod within an hour. I used iPodRip, which, aside from being a little crashy, successfully recovered my collection. It left a temp dir (~/Music/iPodRip/temp) with over 1000 mp3s behind, but I deleted that when I noticed it later.

  29. Re: Duh by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1
  30. The War for the Home is Over: Apple Won by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The War for the Home Media PC Market is Over, and Apple Has Won

    Let's review, shall we?

    • Apple has the best media-enabled PC
    • Apple has the best operating system for playing and manipulating media content...by a wide margin.
    • Apple has the best music playing software (iTunes).
    • Apple has the best MP3 player (iPod) by an overwhelming margin.
    • Apple has the best legal music downloading service (iTunes Music Store) by a similarly overwhelming margin.
    • Now apple has what appears to be the best video-download store (also iTunes). Amazon and company took their best shot to capture the home media market with UnBox...and it's crap. Whatever drawbacks iTunes has as a media delivery platform, they pale in comparison to UnBox's unweildy, power-hungry, DRMed piece of crap.
    • Come early 2007, Apple will have what is probably the best set-top box on the market, with an attractive price point. Add a MythTV-like recorder function to that (and I'm sure they're working on it), and you have far and away the market leader right out of the gate.

    In short, in anything in home entertainment that requires a real user interface, Apple has already beaten the competition so soundly that it is hard to see how they will recover. Apart from the XBox 360 line (still a money-loser, though they might finally eek out a profit if Sony doesn't get their act together), Microsoft is completely absent with viable competitors. With $349 for an 80 GB video iPod, does anyone think Zune, due in November, is going to be anything but dead on arrival?

    Game over, Man.

    -Crow T. Trollbot

    1. Re:The War for the Home is Over: Apple Won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only question is, how many times a day do you jerk off to a picture of Steve Jobs?

  31. In the iFuture: by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Hey, you've got a bit of dust on your clothes"


    "That's not dust! That's my ipod!"

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  32. Pictures of the set-top box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Via gizmodo http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/apple-showtime/apple-sh owtime-itv-one-more-thing-photos-200139.php Posted anonymously so I don't get called a karma whore

  33. Captioning? EyeTV support? by awtbfb · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My key question: will the movies and updated TV shows have closed captioning? Under iTMS6 they do not. Likewise, the current iPod doesn't support closed captioning either.

    On a related note, will iTunes allow importing of content from EyeTV, VIDEO_TS folders (guessing no due to Front Row), or ripping of DVDs? EyeTV integrates with FrontRow, but will it work with this new iTV box? I can rip my CDs already, can I now rip my DVDs?

    1. Re:Captioning? EyeTV support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can rip my CDs already, can I now rip my DVDs?
      Just get MacTheRipper. Does Apple have to supply 100% of the software on your computer? MacTheRipper plus Popcorn work pretty well, although I have to reboot between Popcorn sessions or else I burn a coaster. Probably needs an upgrade, but it's pirated so I'm out of luck.
    2. Re:Captioning? EyeTV support? by KyolFrilander · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm kind of surprised this hasn't turned into an ADA issue yet. I'm not deaf, but I like captioning so I don't have to fight with the volume to catch the quieter parts as well as the loud parts.

          It's probably expecting too much to get video _and_ captioning data on a 320x240 screen that's only what, 2.5" diagonal? But certainly on the PC.

      --
      Buddha says, "Shut your karma hole."
    3. Re:Captioning? EyeTV support? by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      It's probably expecting too much to get video _and_ captioning data on a 320x240 screen that's only what, 2.5" diagonal? But certainly on the PC.

      I downloaded a show I knew had english subtitles for a foreign language part of the show. It was easy to read on my computer. I don't have a video iPod so I cannot test on the iPod screen. My gut says it would be OK for people with reasonably good eyesight since iPod calendar and notes are legible for me.

  34. Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic? I thought the parent post was somewhat Informative.

    1. Re:Offtopic? by dema · · Score: 1

      Think again.

    2. Re:Offtopic? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Think different.

    3. Re:Offtopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think differently.

    4. Re:Offtopic? by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Think Different.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
  35. Core 2 Duo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While everybody is churning out core 2 duo, apple is not. Steve, get you act together

  36. Comsumerism by NineNine · · Score: 1

    All this silly Apple hype is is just a disgusting display of consumerism run amok. It's THE shiny gadget to waste your money on, so it's gonna get lots of press. Yuck. But hey, what's patriotism if it isn't going even further into debt to buy more Chinese-made plastic shit that you don't need?

    1. Re:Comsumerism by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      When somebody uses the word "consumerism," they're typically some angry loner lashing out at the masses in order to feel unique and individual. Kudos for tying "patriotism" in to your mini-rant against the peons beneath you.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Comsumerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great country. We have so much peace and prosperity, buying less than other people do is considered a "counterculture" movement.

    3. Re:Comsumerism by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      The new nanos are aluminum, not plastic :)

    4. Re:Comsumerism by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the stereotype doesn't fit. I own a retail store. And yes, it is all about consumerism. /status/penis size.

    5. Re:Comsumerism by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the Iraw war and New Orleans "peaceful" or "prosperous", respectively.

    6. Re:Comsumerism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Iraw war is being fought in Iraw. New Orleans is incredibly prosperous for condo developers.

    7. Re:Comsumerism by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for others, but the ipod is the best value for my money. I don't care for radio (Satellite or terrestial), and I probably spend about 12 hours per week commuting. Over the three years that I've had my current ipod, it works out to about $0.15 per hour for entertainment while commuting.

      Also, I know there are other MP3 players available, but none of them integrate with my car's stereo (Or future car stereos) as easily and cheaply as the ipod does. I also really like the ipod's interface.

      So, is it still 'a disgusting display of consumerism run amok' if the ipod is the best solution for me? I'm guessing that there are plenty of others who have looked into alternatives, and aren't just buying one because it's a new ipod.

    8. Re:Comsumerism by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 1

      I don't buy this argument at all. Having my music collection in my pocket improves my life immeasurably. It's almost a spiritual thing to have instant access to decades of the greatest music ever recorded at my fingertips.

      I don't buy a new iPod every time Steve Jobs pimps one, but so what if someone wants the newest iPod every year? The old iPod doesn't get thrown in the trash, it gets re-sold or given away to someone else who gets the same enjoyment out of it.

      So take your faux-hippie sensibility and cram it, my friend.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
    9. Re:Comsumerism by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      whatever you nazi conformist cheerleader

      *lights a djarum black*

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    10. Re:Comsumerism by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      All this silly Apple hype is is just a disgusting display of consumerism run amok. It's THE shiny gadget to waste your money on, so it's gonna get lots of press. Yuck.

      In case you missed it: There is no law requiring you to purchase a new iPod just because they're available. If you don't want one, don't buy one.

      Or, in words you might understand better, "It's not cool to harsh someone else's groove, dude."

      Now take your Birkenstocks and Patchuli and go post somewhere else.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  37. Just downloaded a movie... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Informative

    I downloaded The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy as a test.

    - The movie is 1.22 GB, and downloaded in about 20 minutes on a 100 Mbps connection (Internet2).
    - The movie was able to be played before downloading was finished, and could skip to anywhere in the content that was already complete.
    - The content shows itself as being protected by "FairPlay Version: 2".
    - The bitrate is 1.5Mbps.
    - The framerate is 24fps.
    - The audio on this particular movie is Protected AAC, stereo, 128kbps, 44.1kHz.
    - The video on this particular movie is Protected H.264/AVC0 640x272 (Widescreen format, probably just 640x480 with the black bars eliminated).
    - The video looks very good (indeed, "near DVD quality") on a high quality 20" LCD. (I'm not a "videophile", but this is absolutely more than watchable on a nice quality large TV or monitor, and I suspect most consumers would agree).
    - The video can be played in QuickTime, and uses QuickTime Chapters for DVD chapters; chapters are also accessible in iTunes.
    - The video file can be burned to a DVD, but you cannot burn the file as a video DVD.
    - You can play the file on multiple computers (I *believe* up to three as opposed to five for music), or on an unlimited number of iPods (if the usage rights haven't changed with iTunes 7; I haven't looked through the terms - if someone knows this to be different please correct me. In any case, it's already less restrictive than Unbox).
    - iTunes 7.0 requires QuickTime 7.1.3.
    - Pretty much every movie I looked at was $9.99; some new releases were up to $14.99, but were cheaper if preordered.
    - When used on a Mac in a media center configuration, or with the forthcoming iTV solution that will presumably be much like a video AirPort Express (and yes, I know it's not an AirPort Express, but it will probably act a lot like a AirPort Express functionally, except allowing the streaming of video to your TV), this will be a pretty compelling and vertically integrated solution for most consumers.

    1. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dwette · · Score: 1

      Pan and Scan low-res video for $10-15/movie? What's the point? This would only be interesting -- together with iTV -- if it were high-definition to stream to my TV via the HDMI output of iTV. But for it to not even be anamorphic widescreen video at 720x480 is completely laughable. And I haven't even mentioned the audio...

    2. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by PopeZaphod · · Score: 1

      Protected H.264/AVC0 640x272 (Widescreen format, probably just 640x480 with the black bars eliminated)

      That's what I was afraid of. Anything 16:9 will look like arse on an HDTV.

      --
      ->
    3. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      Well, keep in mind that the TV shows all started out at 320x240, and are (along with new video content) now 640x480 with Dolby Surround (when available).

      I'd imagine a lot of this is incremental, in part because of delivery concerns and the problems broadband providers have.

      Further, Jobs already demoed an HD version of The Incredibles going to the iTV box. So I imagine improvements are coming, here. Remember the type of people these services are initially targeted at: normal consumers, not people who have already set up HD MythTV Linux boxes in their living room and rip their DVD collections to 2TB media libraries.

    4. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      my 16:9 dvds upscaled look just fine on my 50" 1080p HDTV through component. If the XBox360 had HDMI, it would be that instead...but at least the movies i've watched so far are just fine.

    5. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      640x272 is not good. I was hoping that it would be 640x480 with anamorphic 16:9 widescreen (like widescreen dvds)

    6. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by jbtule · · Score: 1

      It's not Pan and Scan, it's widescreen as the parent said. It's just has a reduced vertical resolution when you view on a widescreen display rather than being anamorphic. Pan and Scan refers to the content, anamorphic in it's simplest sense refers to the shape of the pixels. They probably have a 640x480 square pixel cap right now due to limitations of the iPod. In the event, it was mentioned that you use the same file for the iPod as the computer/tv. While i believe 640 x XXX is viewable, I'm dissappointed as well at the pricing being so close to a dvd with the resolution being lacking. If they had rentals 640 x XXX it would've be fine.

    7. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by Pinkybum · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is going to fly with the general public. Here are some the issues I see:

      1. Downloading - easy 20 mins not too long to wait, very convenient
      2. Playback on computer - easy but not as comfortable as living room TV
      3. Playback on TV - comfortable but system probably quite hard to setup for non-technophile
      4. DRM - makes it hard to transfer amongst friends and family

      This would make more sense if there was a video device that was tied to this much like the iPod is for music - because I don't see people wanting to watch feature length movies on a 2.5 inch display all that much. So maybe Apple will be launching some sort of futuristic portable projection device that can store these movies - the iProject(or) maybe?

    8. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dwette · · Score: 1

      I understand what anamorphic is. My main point is that for $15 we get video that isn't even as good as DVD (and I rarely pay more than $15 for a DVD). I'm disppointed in the sense that it would have been nice to stream HD (720P) video to either of my HDTVs using the iTV and its HDMI output.

      At least it doesn't seem like the joke that Amazon Unbox video is.

    9. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      So you would prefer stretched pixel (anamorphic) to square pixels?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    10. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      "Downloading - easy 20 mins not too long to wait, very convenient"

      That 20 minute download was over a 100Mbps pipe connected to Internet2 not a typical home DSL or cable broadband connection. I wonder how long it would take before you could start playing it on a 3-5Mbps connection.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    11. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by jubei · · Score: 1
      So you would prefer stretched pixel (anamorphic) to square pixels?


      If you are going to be scaling the video anyway, more pixels is better.

    12. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by Pinkybum · · Score: 1

      You're right probably about an hour at 1.5Mbps playback rate. But probably still comparable to a trip to the video store.

    13. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by hattig · · Score: 1

      Pretty much immediately as long as the DSL or Cable connection is over 1.5mbps down in real world usage, as that's the bitrate of the movies that Apple is providing.

      It looks like Apple is limiting the maximum download rate to 10mbits per download / client. Otherwise it would have taken the original poster 2 minutes to download the 1.2GB file.

      ~~~

      Argh, iTunes 7 still doesn't have an option to 'group compilations in library', arse. I was hoping that the 'album' view would do that.

    14. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If you understood the post you were replying to, then why did you mention pan-and-scan? It was specifically mentioned as widescreen.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      That's what I was afraid of. Anything 16:9 will look like arse on an HDTV.
      my 16:9 dvds upscaled look just fine on my 50" 1080p HDTV through component.
      But 640x480 iTunes movies upscaled to HDTV will probably "look like arse" (GP's description, not mine) because Quicktime's scalers suck arse. The built-in scalers/deinterlacers on cheap set top DVD players are far superior to the sofware scalers/deinterlacers in Quicktime and Apple's DVD player app (last time I checked).

      Don't get me wrong, I think 640x480p sounds great for version 1.0 of the movie store (I was fearing 320x240) and I'm sure they'll look very nice on a display that's 1280 pixels wide. If Apple can improve Quicktime's scaler, then iTunes movies should at least look acceptable on all other display resolutions.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    16. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dwette · · Score: 1

      My bad, I missed reading that it was widescreen. I saw 640x480.
      But if it is 640x480 video rendering widescreen at 640x272 with the black bars removed, that is non-anamorphic video.

      In any case...yawn! So if it's a step towards something with better resolution, wake me up when it gets there.

    17. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Not disagreeing with you, but "anamorphic" is a misnomer unless the content is actually anamorphic. Widescreen and anamorphic are two different things, For example, Sony's HDV cameras have a native 16:9 image sensor. In fact this gives better quality than using an anamorphic lens to squeeze widescreen down into a lower resolution. Anamorphic gives less horizontal resolution/detail than native widescreen. It's a hangover from the days of film, when Cinemascope images had to be squeezed onto a standard "academt" format film frame with a special lens.

      So, in many ways, if you insist on anamorphic, you are getting worse quality than if you want native widescreen. Of course, it's all a hodgepodge, with software methods of creating widescreen images also being termed "anamorphic." Cropped letterbox images or square pixel images are not anamorphic.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      It really sounds unbelievable since the people will pay $15 a movie will likely have a HD capable TV/Display. Those are the guys who wouldn't care about the hassle, low quality to pirate movies.

        Stereo? Hitchikers Guide to Galaxy original region 2 DVD is here, it is true PAL widescreen (720x576) MPEG 2 low compressed and Dolby Digital 5.1 (could be EX (7.1) too,don't have any tool to check right now)

      Checking from Amazon, its DVD is $13.99 right now. Stereo? Even the sitcoms/series from 1980-90s have Pro-Logic data, they aren't stereo.

      Pay $15 and run it Stereo over Prologic II hoping they didn't lose "hints"? It is "so 90s" and "passe" for movie watching people ;)

      I hate comparing online media (the future) to real media but they start a movie store in 2006, Quicktime (Framework) has 5.1 capability for ages and they come up with STEREO, joke like resolution with H264 which will give that codec a needless bad name and so on...

      Looks like as a HDTV convert, I will keep looking for Sony BluRay to drop price a bit or come with a external firewire solution.

      I hope Apple doesn't trust to their cult-like fanbase since I see amazing comments claiming 640x480 is not bad in 2006... Argh. 640x480 is a so low resolution in these times that can be played very easily without losing a single pixel via single cable (composite). If it is intended only for that resolution, forget component,even S-video is pointless.

      For people blinded enough by zealotry: If 640x480 is not bad, switch to it right now, you know "System Preferences" and "Displays" and get used to watching DVDs in that mode :)

    19. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by dwette · · Score: 1

      Yup...like I said...wake me up when it's over, and we can get back to the business of delivering high definition content to our HDTVs. Streaming 640x272 widescreen movies via iTV to an HDTV is pointless. It's about as bad as all the people who buy an HD monitor, hook it up to their analog cable box with a RF connector and think they have high definition television.

    20. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If people blindly buy products without checking their specs or thinking at all, they won't have to "fill" HDTV market.

      Check Mac sites, all praising Apple for such "invention", nobody argues about buying lower-than-dvd resolution and plain stereo content for same price as DVD.

      Perhaps Apple trusts to this?

      It is 2006, I demand 720p (at least) and 5.1 sound. Everyone should.

    21. Re:Just downloaded a movie... by PopeZaphod · · Score: 1

      I'm actually more concerned with displaying 272 lines of resolution on anything larger than a 20" monitor.

      --
      ->
  38. iTunes 7 and vector interfaces by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

    iTunes 7 addressed every last issue I had with it. In fact, two of the things--separation of media libraries and an album cover art view--were being discussed in my IRC chan only to have them addressed half an hour later. Good job, Apple!

    One thing I noticed since iTunes 5 introduced its "smooth metal" look is how easier it is to vectorize simple gradients like that than a texture like brushed metal, and I assumed it was in preparation for a future vectorized interface in OS X Leopard. iTunes 7 furthers that agenda by removing the blue-pulse Aqua scrollbars in favor of flat, gradient-shaded versions. Are these signs of the next vector Aqua?

    It should be noted that Windows Vista's Glass theme, while technically resolution independent, still uses bitmap scaling for its interface, choosing between different resolution resources depending on the user's DPI. A Microsoft developer wrote on his blog that they did this because they didn't have the vector tools in place yet, and they didn't want to disrupt their existing artwork generation process. Lame.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
    1. Re:iTunes 7 and vector interfaces by Single+GNU+Theory · · Score: 2, Informative

      iTunes 7 addressed every last issue I had with it.

      Quicktime still installs an icon in your system tray in Windows, no matter if you had that checkbox deselected previously. Dammit.

      --
      Little Debian: America's #1 Snack Distro!
    2. Re:iTunes 7 and vector interfaces by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      does my head in as well. It remembers every other preference except that one.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    3. Re:iTunes 7 and vector interfaces by wootest · · Score: 1

      Scalable Aqua is implemented in Leopard (Mac OS X 10.5) and looks more or less the same, like the "fake high-resolution screenshots" in the media product shots. Aside from the fact that Leopard's iTunes build will probably ship with scalable graphics to fit in, this has nothing to do with that effort. I don't think Scalable Aqua is vector-based either (my money's on some kind of mipmap), but it *could* be through PDFs.

      While on the subject of those scrollers, I don't like how they made everything look "Graphite". If I selected "Aqua" in my color scheme, I expect Aqua and not dull grey.

  39. Apple = Big Brother by amliebsch · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love that somewhat Orwellian slide that Engadget has from the presentation:

    Apple is in your den
    Apple is in your living room
    Apple is in your car
    Apple is in your pocket

    What's next?

    Strength Through iTunes
    iTunes Through Apple

    Apple Prevails

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:Apple = Big Brother by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I thought the accompanying text looked like song lyrics:

      "So, you can download all this great content online
      It's: Now playing on a computer near you
      Now playing on an iPod near you
      Coming soon to a TV near you
      Apple is in your den
      Apple is in your living room
      Apple is in your car
      Apple is in your pocket."

      They should make it into an ad jingle. But to what melody? With a little jiggling around, how about Pink Floyd, "Brain Damage", Dark Side of the Moon?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:Apple = Big Brother by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Apple is peace.
      Apple is strength.
      Apple is slav...er, wait a minute...

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    3. Re:Apple = Big Brother by CharAznable · · Score: 1

      Very appropriate, now that you can listen to "Brain Damage/Eclipse" without gaps :P

      --
      The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    4. Re:Apple = Big Brother by Carthag · · Score: 1

      "Apple Prevails" would be Mooresque, not Orwellian!

    5. Re:Apple = Big Brother by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I just wish that he'd ended that list with:

      "Apple is in your pants...
      ...pocket"

      instead.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    6. Re:Apple = Big Brother by Moby+Cock · · Score: 1

      What's next?

      Apple is in your wallet

    7. Re:Apple = Big Brother by monopole · · Score: 1

      ...we never wear the pants they call the Calvin Klein's
      Cause Calvin Klein's no friend of mine
      Don't want nobody's name on my behind


      -RUN DMC "RockBox" (anticipating an alternative)

    8. Re:Apple = Big Brother by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

      Apple is in yr base, killing yr d00dz!

  40. The Path to Disney by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Troll

    "All 75 movies initially available are from Disney-related studios."

    When can I upload my own terrorism fan fiction, say a version of the story of 9/11/2001 that blames Al Gore, to iTunes, and become a Disney-related studio?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  41. x64? by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

    Does this version of iTunes finally support the x64 for the PC? That was really annoying to not be able to install 6.0.5 on Windows XP x64 without having to use some sort of workaround.

    --
    - .k. -
    1. Re:x64? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the price of being an early adopter for a currently useless technology. ;)

    2. Re:x64? by codedemonuk · · Score: 1

      Works fine. Installs without any problems. Just tried it on my Windows x64 PC.

    3. Re:x64? by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      As snarky as your response is, I agree. The Pandora's box that x64 has opened is frightening. I was hoping to do all my video editing and encoding and capture with this box but x64 support for most things is virtually nonexistent.

      WDM codecs, video capture drivers (I have an ATI AIW), etc etc have little or no x64 counterparts. I thought XP x64 was relatively cheap (I got the upgrade) but now I am fearing the prospect of having to upgrade to Vista when it comes out in order to take advantage of drivers that companies will actually write drivers for.

      --
      - .k. -
    4. Re:x64? by Cleveland+Steamer · · Score: 1

      Based on what's currently shown at this page, I wouldn't count on it.

      Maybe Apple is just taking its sweet time to update the page.

    5. Re:x64? by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      I have since downloaded iTunes 7 and successfully installed it. The link you provided dates back to April 2005, probably when XP x64 was still in beta.

      --
      - .k. -
    6. Re:x64? by Cleveland+Steamer · · Score: 1
      The link you provided dates back to April 2005, probably when XP x64 was still in beta.
      Created on April 7, 2005, yes. But it was last updated on July 10, 2006, which was well after XP x64 went into production.
  42. HFS! Gapless! by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    The new version of iTunes also has gapless playback support. No word yet on whether the new iPods do the same or not, but it'd be nice.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  43. Possible iTunes bug by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

    I was listening to music in iTunes 7 when I went to the iPod games page (), which has an embedded Quicktime movie. When the movie started playing the music in iTunes started playing at double time, like it was being fast forwarded. Anyone else care to try to see if it's an iTunes bug?

    1. Re:Possible iTunes bug by aesiamun · · Score: 1

      I went to the new iPod Nano ad page and indeed my music sped up very quickly. As soon as i stopped the video the music returned to normal speed.

    2. Re:Possible iTunes bug by Prometheas · · Score: 1

      OK, well I can beat that: I'm getting an "unknown error" of type (-50) after I accept the EULA... and iTunes 6 is completely gone, obviously.

      Top that!! ;-)

      (At least Songbird still works... sigh.

    3. Re:Possible iTunes bug by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      Is that Mac or Windows iTunes?

    4. Re:Possible iTunes bug by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

      Windows.

    5. Re:Possible iTunes bug by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I had the same thing happen while iTunes was still scanning my library for Gapless. I relaunched iTunes and it was fine. Probably reusing a buffer, and didn't think about it. All in all, I am pleased as punch about Gapless, and ESPECIALLY that it works for ALL ALL ALL items in your Library! I am listening to Jeff Beck "Blow by Blow" the way it was intended... Finally! (100% gapless)

  44. Re:No movie burning? Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without it - sorry, folks, but I'll wait.

    They want you to buy the media center pc they are coming out with. That way you download it to your pc and watch it on TV without having to burn a disc.

    The masses will love it. The only question is will it have TIVO functionality?

  45. Say no to "pan & scan" by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    Cropped movies are a BAD thing. Theatrical movies are much wider than 4:3. I stopped watching "pan & scan" movies a long time ago. The idea is that a human tries to scan left and right to get the right shot. Of course, things don't always go well. I got sick of people talking who I couldn't even see! Unless the movies are in widescreen--I'm not interested.

    1. Re:Say no to "pan & scan" by sith · · Score: 1

      Luckily these aren't Pan & Scan - I guess Apple was listening to you!

    2. Re:Say no to "pan & scan" by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Uh, Apple puts widescreen TV shows as widescreen downloads. What makes you think they'll pan&scan the movies? Or are you just spitballing, trying to find a reason to hate this?

  46. Smack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When I read the part about iTV, for some reason I got this image in my head of Steve Jobs walking up to Bill Gates and delivering a resounding *SMACK*, before walking off without explanation.

    As someone who only lightly follows product releases, I look at both the media center ability of the 360, and the media center ability of the iTV. But it's only the iTV that's simple enough for me to understand how it works by just looking at a picture of the product. For some reason, microsoft's services just don't have the kind of cohesion between their products that would grab the average Joe's attention and understanding. This might be a good reason to switch to mac...

    1. Re:Smack! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The X-Box 360 is being marketed as a games console and has no serious non-game media services. The iTV is emphatically not trying to compete with that.

      I wonder if you can think of any major media company that's about to release a machine it is pushing as some kind of major revolution in media, say, trying to push some kind of media format as part of the system, one that it's claiming is a computer, and, perhaps, that's conveniently priced at twice the price of the $300 iTV, that you could argue Steve Jobs is really sending a message to?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Smack! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Its no secret Microsoft has been trying to use its consoles as a shoe-horn into the living room. That you don't know this is a testiment to how badly they are failing in that attempt.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Smack! by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "As someone who only lightly follows product releases, I look at both the media center ability of the 360, and the media center ability of the iTV. But it's only the iTV that's simple enough for me to understand how it works by just looking at a picture of the product."

      Really? You can tell to work it just by looking at a picture of the product?

      Why don't you buy a dedicated media center extender then instead of an XBox? They're cheaper and perform the identical function that iTV does. In fact, one could say Apple copied the idea. Here's a picture so that you can know how to use it:

      http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/mediacenter/ext ender/owner/default.mspx

  47. Dag Nabbit. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wanna Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro
    I wanna Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro
    ...
    I wanna Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro
    I wanna Core 2 Duo MacBook Pro

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Dag Nabbit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, too.
      Me, too. ...

      Me, too.
      Me, too.

      I was all set to drop ~$3000 today. Maybe they'll update them after the 16th when the back-to-school special ends? I can't believe they'll wait much longer after the iMac updates.

    2. Re:Dag Nabbit. by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd hurry up on that one, the guy who works next to me just goes on and on and on and on and on and on ... and on about it.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    3. Re:Dag Nabbit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really would wait on that. Between the battery recall and the apparent overheating problems (and I say "apparent" because our Mac repair shop has about 50% of their current repairs taken up by MacBooks right now. Not to mention I had a customer today call his MacBook Pro "the biggest piece of crap I've ever owned.") I think Apple still has some kinks to be worked out of this particular product.

  48. The Real News: No Black Mock -T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can everyone get so caught up in all the gadgetry that no one noticed Steve was wearing a red button up?

  49. Global hotkeys in Win32 version... by John+Miles · · Score: 1

    ... still don't seem to have been added, although I'm sure the new blue-note icon motif is to die for. Sheesh. Apple still seems to be convinced that iTunes is the only application their Windows users ever run.

    It remains to be seen if Apple has divined the secrets of the holy WM_PAINT message. I'm optimistic; the UI does look a little snappier.

    (Plug for my freeware implementation of iTunes global hotkeys, which really should have been rendered obsolete by Apple: http://www.ke5fx.com/ilaunch/readme.htm)

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  50. They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the UK by joe545 · · Score: 1

    ITV (note all capitals) is the name of the major terrestrial TV channel in the UK, so Apple will probably have to change it to avoid confusion/trademarks. Otherwise, "I'm going to use my iTV to record ITV".

  51. Perfect for the digital family by nursegirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Movies/Shows/Music can now be shared between 5 computers, unlimited iPods and as many iTVs (or whatever) as you buy. It just makes so much sense for people with home & cottage to be able to bring a bunch of movies to the cottage without having to pack up DVDs. Once this moves up to HDTV standards (bandwidth is probably the only reason they haven't yet), then this could just end the format war before it started.

    Also, you can backup movies downloaded from iTMS onto DVD, it just isn't a DVD-player readable format. So, they've even thought about that touch. Now just to decide how long to wait. Second edition? Third edition? It's always hard to tell with Apple products. Just when will they hit that sweet spot?

  52. Smart, Apple, very smart! by coolfrood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The last time Apple did an iTunes upgrade, they added a minibrowser mode which would basically call home and tell Apple what you were listening to, so that the store would give you recommendations. There was a big hue and cry about the privacy concerns, so Apple changed that to be off by default, instead of on by default.

    With iTunes 7, Apple will now let you get the artwork for your entire music collection, even if it wasn't bought from iTMS. This means that Apple has now given you a reason to willingly tell them about your entire music collection, effectively letting them get the information they want about your musical tastes. Very smart!

    1. Re:Smart, Apple, very smart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except for this line from the _summary_
      "Apple does not keep any information related to the contents of your music library"

    2. Re:Smart, Apple, very smart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iTunes only checks songs that don't have album art, and actually have an album name. It doesn't process/send Apple the other songs. Case in point: when I ran it on my 6.3k song library, it only went through 1.4k of songs.
      If it's a subversive attempt to figure out everyone's complete music collections, it's a poor one.

    3. Re:Smart, Apple, very smart! by coolfrood · · Score: 1

      Most people I know including me don't buy stuff from Apple, which means they are unlikely to have any album art. Sure, you could've assigned album art to the music you had ripped, but most people are too lazy. Apple wants to know about the music that you didn't buy off of iTMS. Et, voila!

  53. iTunes for 64 bit Processing? by faust13 · · Score: 1

    I noticed Apple was mum on iTunes for 64 bit processing. Which is too bad, because I really miss having iTunes since I upgraded to WinXP 64... especially since it means using Windows Media Player (**shudder**).

    1. Re:iTunes for 64 bit Processing? by jeeperscats · · Score: 1

      "since I upgraded to WinXP 64"

      upgraded?

    2. Re:iTunes for 64 bit Processing? by bezza · · Score: 1

      You can use iTunes on win 64. It should install normally and work fine with the exception of the cd burning. To fix this you need to download the 64bit version of the gear drivers and copy them over the apple provided ones. It will then work.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    3. Re:iTunes for 64 bit Processing? by faust13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Try it.

      The installer stops you and tells you it won't install on 64 bit OSes. This may have been true with older distros, but it's not now.

  54. Itunes finally added "Album Artist" tag field. by kjlong · · Score: 1

    It's about time they fixed that.

  55. As a wise man once said: by Cadallin · · Score: 1

    Because "Me like sex."

  56. Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You don't have a girlfriend! Nobody on slashdot does. Ha. Ha. Ha.

    1. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those of us who actually have lives pity you.

      ..."pity," in this case, being another word for "openly mock."

  57. Tetris by Vollernurd · · Score: 1

    To hell with all this "movies" and "set-top box" shit. I got TETRIS on my iPod now!

    Woop!

    --
    Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules.
    1. Re:Tetris by DarthStrydre · · Score: 1

      I laughed when I read your comment. I had Tetris 17 years ago on my iGame^H^H^H^H^H Nintendo GAME BOY with 4 channel synthesized stereo sound!

  58. Student discount by NemosomeN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did the student discount apply to iPods? I'm almost 100% certain it did, but it seems it doesn't anymore. I was just looking at iPods last night...

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
    1. Re:Student discount by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

      it doesn't apply when new iPods first come out but may apply later.

    2. Re:Student discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're thinking of the college student promo, that ends on the 16th.

    3. Re:Student discount by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

      No, not the free ipod with a mac, just the across-the-board student discount they offer.

      --
      I hate grammar Nazi's.
  59. Re:Apple == Big Brother by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I love that somewhat Orwellian slide that Engadget has from the presentation:

    Apple is in your den

    Apple is in your living room

    Apple is in your car

    Apple is in your pocket

    What's next?

    Strength Through iTunes

    iTunes Through Apple

    Apple Prevails


    It's always like that. Apple is going along, brainwashing people. Things are great. And then when we are watching a Steve Jobs special event presentation on a giant screen in an auditorium some athletic chic from IBM comes running in and throws a big hammer at the screen. Bummer.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  60. Where's My New MacBook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was kinda prepared to place my order today. MacBook with Core 2 Duo. Bummer.
    I will stop reading your stupid rumor sites now.

  61. Yawn by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The new iPod Shuffle is a joke. A big part of the appeal of the Shuffle is that it had an integrated USB connector - you could use it to replace a USB flash drive and get an MP3 player to boot, without having to carry around a cable. Now you need a cable - a stupid proprietary one at that, not even a standard mini-USB connector. Moreover, one of the other advantages of the Shuffle was that you could hold it like a remote and operate it easily (and even shake it along to the music). Now that it's aluminum and roughly square, it's not going to be the easiest thing to hold.

    The Nano is - well, also kind of disappointing. 8GB is nice (though SanDisk and other manufacturers already offered it), but the new design isn't really new at all. It looks like the iPod mini, which is great if you liked the Mini. I guess Apple didn't want their "mid-range" iPod looking like the "real thing", but, come on, the Nano looked great - so great, in fact, that Apple modeled the 5G after it. And where are the new features? No game downloads? No video playback? It's the same as the old Nano, but it doesn't look as cool. You can't even get the 8GB version in the new colors (it's black only).

    And games? Great. You can download Bejewled onto your iPod. Nevermind the fact that you really need a touchscreen to play Bejewled. Nevermind that every cellphone and every PDA made in the last 5 years can already play games.

    Movies? Apple's going to have to do better than $14.99 for a movie. I can get the DVD for that price, transfer it to a PSP/iPod/PDA, and be able to play it in DTS/DD 5.1 on my DVD player as well. Portable DVD player? $150, and it has a 7" screen too. Apple's service seems strangely reminiscent of the many movie download services that have been out for years (Movielink, anyone?).

    Same iPods, different day. Apple can't seem to come up with anything new.

    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took a look at the iTunes Store and found that most of the movies are $9.99.

    2. Re:Yawn by dangermouse · · Score: 5, Insightful
      A big part of the appeal of the Shuffle is that it had an integrated USB connector - you could use it to replace a USB flash drive and get an MP3 player to boot, without having to carry around a cable. Now you need a cable - a stupid proprietary one at that, not even a standard mini-USB connector.
      I was happy to see the new Shuffle, until you pointed this out. Not because I want or need a USB flash drive, but because it's just less convenient. My girlfriend has one of the white Shuffles, and it's been great for mindlessly grabbing some music to take with us. I've always thought of it as a sort of sample syringe for music: You jab it into the laptop, it sucks up whatever's in there, and then you pull it out and you're good to go.

      A dock isn't so bad if you have a desktop computer, but with a laptop that moves around a lot, it's suddenly a third component to keep track of, where you really only want two.

    3. Re:Yawn by getNewNickName · · Score: 1

      It'll be interesting to see if form wins over function with the new Shuffle design. Adding a USB plug would have made it much larger, which is probably why they didn't want to add a built-in USB plug.

    4. Re:Yawn by monopole · · Score: 1

      The lack of an easy dock kills any Apple purchases for me. The only reason I buy iPods in the first place is that a dock allows my mom (who has limited vision) to dock her iPod without looking.

      What kills me about the nano is the lack of video. My PlayYan equipped GBAs have allowed me to watch video (whole movies) from a flash player for years now. Just about any other PMP allows this too, why not oh so innovative Apple?

    5. Re:Yawn by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Adding a USB plug would have made it much larger, which is probably why they didn't want to add a built-in USB plug

      Some SD memory cards (like this Sandisk one) have a built-in USB connector, so in terms of size it's not like they couldn't have done it with the new Shuffle

      Granted, this could be an easily breakable part...

    6. Re:Yawn by delight8799 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The white shuffle is a very convenient USB flash drive. Having a dock seriously limits its functionality. It's the same as the older iPods. With the older dock-less iPod, all you need is a firewire cable to connect it to the laptop, and it functions as a good backup drive. Having to lug around an additional piece of (low packing-efficiency) plastic is not appealing, especially with the challenge of squeezing everything into an already too small laptop bag as cabin luggage (frequent flyer, yay). Which is why I'm still hanging onto that ancient brick of a 2nd gen iPod, I guess.

      Nonetheless, the tie clip shuffle looks good.

  62. Brushed metal by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    >we love new iPods.

    Speak for yourself, apple boy! ;-)

    Aaanyway, if Brushed Metal hears about the new interface, he's gonna be really fucking mad.

  63. Will FairPlay crack still work by slagell · · Score: 1

    Just last week we saw a story on slashdot about iTunes 6 FairPlay DRM being cracked. I imagine it is just a matter of time before the Hymanal project will pick that up. But if iTunes 7 uses new DRM tech, then anyone who updates prematurely might not be able to use the new iTunes 6 DRM crack. Interesting that iTunes 7 came out just a week after that crack was made public. Get your "upgrades" now!

  64. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by nursegirl · · Score: 1

    They already mentioned that iTV is their internal development name and that they haven't come up with a shipping name for it yet. Interesting that they even showed it without a product name or shipping date.

  65. iPr0n by blackjackshellac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    God you guys are sheep. iPod and iTunes are crap. Crap!

    Crap!

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

    1. Re:iPr0n by Prometheas · · Score: 1

      Hello little troll... what are you doing so very far from your cave?

    2. Re:iPr0n by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There actually good products.
      I enjoy using them, do to ease, convience, and quality.

      No, I don't own a Mac.

      OTOH, you don't ahve to like them, just like you don't have to waste space telling us they're crap . Escpiecally without any examples.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. Re:HFS! Gapless! by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 1

    iTunes has had gapless for a while. Looks like the iPods get the benefit, though I'm not sure what they're doing there... Maybe they're joining the files on the ipod and using file markers to separate things in the interface. Time will tell :-)

  67. iTunes Phone Driver in the iTunes 7 package (!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you guys notice that the custom install for iTunes 7.0 features a grayed out item 'iTunes Phone Driver'. Just wondering what this might be.

    1. Re:iTunes Phone Driver in the iTunes 7 package (!) by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      ROKR, SLVR, and other Motorola phones run iTunes for mobile phones. That's what the driver is for.

      Sorry. It's a great rumour, but the Apple cellphone is not going to happen.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:iTunes Phone Driver in the iTunes 7 package (!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prob. to support the updated Razor w/ iTunes that was announced today..

      Yeah, I wish Apple would partner with crackberry... A nice iPodberry with all my fav crackberry features+ a better iPod like interface+Salling Clicker Support to use it as a remote w/ my PowerBook... Never going to happen, but it doesn't hurt to wish..

    3. Re:iTunes Phone Driver in the iTunes 7 package (!) by Steve+Fuller · · Score: 1

      Just an update for these phones: http://direct.motorola.com/hellomoto/itunes/

  68. Why pre-announce iTV? by yardbird · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Doesn't it seem out of character for Apple to announce iTV well before it's ready? They haven't even picked the real name yet. What's the idea? Trying to make sure the event doesn't seem like a "me too" following Amazon's movie service?

    --
    Free, legal music for iTunes users.
    1. Re:Why pre-announce iTV? by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      The holiday season is coming up and Apple's set-top box isn't ready. Presumably, Apple announced it today so that people will pass up other boxes and wait for Apple's.

      Apple clearly wants market dominance here, and they don't want an entire Christmas's worth of competing product to be out there when they eventually release it!

    2. Re:Why pre-announce iTV? by sray · · Score: 1

      They are stealing a page from Microsoft's playbook by sowing Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt (FUD). This will give consumers something to think about when they are deciding where to spend their Christmas dollars.

    3. Re:Why pre-announce iTV? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      But remember, when it's Apple doing it, it's not FUD/vaporware, it's "Steve is giving us a very special sneak peek at what's just around the corner!"

    4. Re:Why pre-announce iTV? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I trust/like Amazon since it was founded, in fact I did my first "online purchase" from there. As I like them, even purchased e-books from them, I went to their movie store when it was announced.

      Is Amazon having bad financial times or going out of business? Amazon movie store is more windows only than Microsoft.com itself!

      It requires .NET 2.0, Windows Media Player (latest, which doesn't even exist on mac), IE...

      This is not Amazon.com like, this is "I will start a media dotcom and get sponsorship from MS media division" like.

      At the end, we have seen what Microsoft (Amazon) and Apple offers, lets hope Real Networks come up with a solution for HDTV/Dolby Digital owners, these offerings for such price are a joke.

  69. Mac Mini instead of DVR by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I'm getting very tempted to dump my DVR+CATV and replace it with a Mac Mini and a TV antenna. I currently pay about $70 / month for an HDTV DVR from Comcast. With a Mac Mini, I could get most of my shows from iTunes for less money, and the rest could come over-the-air from local broadcasts. (Pretty much everything that's not on iTunes is on broadcast TV or Netflix.)

    The advantage is that I anticipate that a Mac mini & iTunes is a lot more reliable then Comcast's DVR. The disadvantage (if I understand correctly,) is that most shows aren't available until the day after broadcast. This really is annoying, because I like to watch the Daily Show and Colbert Report as soon as they air.

    This would also reduce clutter, as I wouldn't have to switch between seperate DVRs and DVD players. Hopefully the Mac Mini can support USB or FireWire BlueRay and HD-DVD players.

    1. Re:Mac Mini instead of DVR by jaypaulw · · Score: 1

      you obviously don't watch sports (i don't either)

    2. Re:Mac Mini instead of DVR by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Miglia TV Micro
      EyeTV compatible, small, no messy wires...

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:Mac Mini instead of DVR by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      A bunch of the replies pointed me to the EyeTV, which is what I would buy with a Mac Mini: http://www.elgato.com/. I rarely watch sports, but when I do, it's almost always from channels that I can get over the air. (I do my patriotic duty and usually watch the Super Bowl for the commercials.) Besides, how long do you think it'll be until most sports can be streamed over the internet?

    4. Re:Mac Mini instead of DVR by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly surprised that Apple hasn't partnered with any of the major leagues to sell game broadcasts on the iTMS. I know a lot of rabid Bills fans elsewhere in the nation who would happily pay to see the Sunday games.

      --saint

  70. Vista by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they are waiting on Vista.

  71. Bound to do decoding... by Junta · · Score: 1

    The massive amount of throughput required for raw streams would be impossible to trasmit, even over a good network, particularly not 802.11g... Decoding even HD streams is easy with video decoding offload. My 1.8 GHz AthlonXP under mythtv playing 1920x1080 streams has about 50% idle when using XvMC to assist with decoding (using the planar Geforce 6150), so their set top box should have no problem decoding even tough stuff.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  72. Cover artless now being covered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So iTunes7 will put my cover art on the ones where I did not have it before ?

    Guess it sucks to be CoverScout now...

    http://www.equinux.com/us/products/coverscout/inde x.html

  73. This is AWSOME! by Arwing · · Score: 1

    I am choking with joy when I saw the new iPod Nano, I got my nano a bit less than a year ago but I am seriously considering about ditching it (battery life is less than 8 hrs now) and get the new 8 gig version. But where is the iPod phone and full screen ipod people were hyping about?! Especially stuff like these! http://www.apple-style.com/laboratory/

  74. Gapless = overrated by bilbravo · · Score: 1

    Not trying to troll, but the only people I ever hear complain about this are people here. I have a sansa e250, and I had to sit and listen to the thing and pay attention to make sure it wasn't gapless. When I'm listening to music, it's hard to notice the gap. For example, most cds have a small gap between the songs, as the music dies down from one song and the next one begins. It's hardly noticeable due to the volumne decrease/increase 99% of songs have built-in.

    1. Re:Gapless = overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, most cds have a small gap between the songs, as the music dies down from one song and the next one begins. It's hardly noticeable due to the volumne decrease/increase 99% of songs have built-in.

      I'll take "People Who Only Listen To Shitty Music" for $200, Alex.

      Try anything classical, live, or even just an actual album rather than a collection of songs, and you'll see how much gapless playback matters. Jesus. This is just like when people complain about "you have to buy 1 song and 12 songs of filler when you buy a CD!!", as if it's someone else's fault that their taste in music sucks.

    2. Re:Gapless = overrated by ereshiere · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, who cares about gapless when you're playing albums that have gaps? :) There are a bunch that do not, however--Pink Floyd and Radiohead make albums that are one continuous piece of music, and iPods/iTunes prevents the songs from flowing into one another.

    3. Re:Gapless = overrated by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      Then you obviously have never listened to a seamless multi-hour DJ mix. Just find an album by Sven Vath or Krafty Kuts that is broken up into over a dozen tracks. If it's not your style of music, fair enough, but just listen to the transitions, and then imagine them gapless.

  75. Myfairtunes6/7? by Darthmalt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    does anyone know if myfairtunes6 still works with the new version of iTunes?

    1. Re:Myfairtunes6/7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way it will work. Myfairtunes is tied to the binary, only 6.0.4 and 6.0.5 are supported.

      I wonder if Apple did anything to prevent that kind of hack. They might have; then the question is whether you'll still be able to use itunes 6 to decrypt songs you buy with itunes 7.

  76. Selling an image by Xerxes1729 · · Score: 1
    Dell sell products. They're a reliable and trusted name, but they're not exciting. Good, solid, and dull.

    Apple does sell some products, but more than that, they sell an image. Their stuff isn't always the best, but they act like it's the best, and they're so confident in it that people start to think that they're the best.

  77. Well, I've found a bug in iTunes 7 by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a problem with the scrollbars. OSX scrollbars can normally either have both arrows clustered at the bottom right, or one arrow on either end. The preference to change that is in the Appearance control panel.

    But there is a third option, which you generally have to set via the terminal, for double arrows at both ends. This has worked in everything AFAIK until now. iTunes 7 appears to have the arrows at the bottom right by default, and only changes to the arrows at each end if that is set. It doesn't honor the double arrows at both ends setting, instead defaulting back to double arrows only in the lower right. And since it apparently doesn't use the standard arrows, like pretty much everything else, this is relevant.

    This is pretty minor, but annoying, especially since if I couldn't have double arrows at both ends, I'd have single arrows at both ends, but since I won't change the global setting (since everything else still works with it), iTunes uses the double at one end arrows, which I hate.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    1. Re:Well, I've found a bug in iTunes 7 by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you have a lot on yur mind ;-)

      --
      +----------------- | What is the question!
    2. Re:Well, I've found a bug in iTunes 7 by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Just get a scrollwheel mouse, and never worry about those buttons again. Ever.

    3. Re:Well, I've found a bug in iTunes 7 by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      My OSX Mac is a laptop, actually, and I use page up and down keys to scroll mostly. But your suggestion is not a solution. Using the standard scrollbar in iTunes, or at least exactly mimicing its behavior, is the actual solution.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Well, I've found a bug in iTunes 7 by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I concede you have a point, but my Mac is a laptop too, and I still never use those buttons - I use two fingers on the trackpad. If your Mac doesn't do that, you can get a third party install that will do it. Once you get used to it, it's very very hard to live without.

      After what I'd read here, I thought I'd better take a look at iTunes 7... and actually, I think the scrollbars look pretty nice. Not like Java at all to my mind. I agree they should function in the standard way, but I don't mind the look. I hope it's something that will be standard for the scrollbars in Leopard, since I DON'T like the inconsistency between apps - I mean, if I want inconsistency I can look at websites, right?

  78. Oh and btw... by Junta · · Score: 1

    My mythfrontend referenced is also a diskless unit, whether Apple's will be diskless or not I've not seen confirmed, but as a reference with a diskfull server and 512MB of ram, I have a system with instant on (using ACPI sleep) that functionally is close to the previewed iTV, so Apple's undoubtedly gonna have it more smooth and tuned to the task, and what I acheived expect that to be the bare minimum of the set-top box's capability.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  79. Peripheral makers: not so tough? by nobodyman · · Score: 1

    There was a recent story about how much sway the peripheral makers had over Apple, and how new products would be hampered by the accessories market.

    Three days later, apple introduces completely different iPod form factors, and accessory makers instantly have warehouses filled with worthless plastic and fake leather. So much for "sway".

  80. Does anybody feel uneasy about iTunes 7? by shmurfect · · Score: 1

    I don't know, but submitting my playlist to Apple to get album artwork makes me feel a little strange. The RIAA isn't watching, are they (not like I have anything to hide, ummm)? Supposedly Apple does not keep this information, but still, it's not exactly clear from the documentation in iTunes 7 what exactly Apple does with this information (at least not from a cursory glance).

    1. Re:Does anybody feel uneasy about iTunes 7? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

      there have been some 3rd party freeware apps that will fill in your iTunes album art. some would query ITMS and some used Amazon. it is optional to turn it on when you install/upgrade iTunes. after installed, the option is in the preferences for it to constantly check for missing album art. don't use it if you are paranoid? somebody can scan the traffic if they are curious, but i assume it only looks for missing artwork, not submitting the index of your entire library. that would probably bog things down in a big way.

      there was something in a previous version of iTunes that made people initially sketchy. possibly the optional (on by default) links from your artists to the ITMS. if it was that, it turned out to just submit a query when clicked or something.

    2. Re:Does anybody feel uneasy about iTunes 7? by ericdano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a little concerned about this as well.....

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
  81. Slashdot..apple announcement...b*&ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TO save everyone the time of going through the comments here let me summarize...

    (1) $14.99 for a movie..too much! I'll go to wal-mart and buy the thing and rip it...or, alternatively download it off my favorite pirate - sorry I mean file- sharing app.

    Yes you do that you Alpha-Geek you. Meanwhile, the other 99.9% will happily fork over the money to apple while you support that neo-conservative,trade deficit whore known as wal-mart where the employees get no benefits and locked in the store at night. Way to go.

    (2) Linux...Linux..Linux..Where's the Linux support?

    Get a life. Maybe even a girlfriend. Better yet, get a clue.

    (3) No iPhone? This S*&ks. Predictable.

    Yawn. Who cares. WHy even bother to hit submit on this post?

    (4) 640 x 480!!...No HD? What Cr*p why bother.

    Hey - how many people do you know with HD TVs? Ok that many? wow. Now how many people do you know without HD TVs? Lets see...marketing 101...those with the biggest audience win.

    (5) This is Awsome! Apple Rules!

    See # 2 above and Go sit in the corner with the Linux Geeks please

    (6) Apple.Apple.Apple. Why does Slashdot post so many Apple Stories. Why do they get all the attention?

    Marsha!Marsha!Marsha! (if you don't get this, you need to watch more TVland)

    (7) Windows already does all of this. Windows Rules!

    Where do you want to go today? Nowhere because your damn PC has so much spyware it can't do anything....Go sit with the Linux and Apple Geeks in the corner for a while.

    (8) Ooohhh!! Ipods in Colors! I want one!

    You are obivously (a) Female and (b) Lost - this is slashdot not Project Runway.

    (9) Hmmm, Not bad. There are some pros and cons, but overall another incremental step by Apple to integrate itself with consumer's lives.

    Hmmm...Rational. Reasonable and Inciteful. What the H%&l are you doing here?

    1. Re:Slashdot..apple announcement...b*&ing by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      You're telling people to "get a life" and "watch more TV land"? Does... not... compute!

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  82. Re:No movie burning? Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're off the rocker.

    You don't need to burn movies to scratchable, deteriorating discs any more...
    You wanna take them to your friend's house? Take them all with you on your iPod.

    You wanna watch them on TV? Stream them to the iTV box...

  83. Broadband providers BEWARE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what will the ramifications be for bb providers?

    They already over-sell their bandwidth. What happens when tons of users call, complaining that they can't soak up their full pipe with their legal download? Now that there is a potentially widespread use of BB, the providers better be ready for a shakeup.

    Oh, and after offering the current prices for x amount of bandwidth, don't think they're gonna get away with jacking up the price when the REALLY give you that bandwidth, without some congress mandating coming in.

  84. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by Davey+McDave · · Score: 1

    That would be a good point, but before you moan next time, RTFA.

    "10:54AM - "It looks like this [a flatter Mini]. It's called iTV. That's a codeword. We need to come up with a better name."

    --
    I've got the spirit, lose the feeling.
  85. New features by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Informative

    In addition to the great new gapless playback feature, one cool thing "power users" of iTunes might be interested in is that there is now a "Skipped Count" (and "Last Skipped") attribute in iTunes. This will be great for finding those overrated songs that you constantly skip without remembering to downgrade them to fewer stars. Smart Playlists everywhere rejoice!

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
  86. Gapless != overrated by CharAznable · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think you are getting it. In albums such as Dark Side of the Moon, The Wall, or Abbey Road, the songs segue into each other without any volume fade. Every time I listen to Pink Floyd on the iPod I feel like driving an icepick through my ears. The gap just ruins the experience for me. Gapless playback in indeed a very welcome addition, and the reason I will upgrade my 3 year old iPod. Normal, distinct songs on normal albums don't suffer through this. And the reason you hear about it in Slashdot is because geeks tend to like less mainstream music where nonstandard song structures are more prevalent.

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
    1. Re:Gapless != overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Every time I listen to Pink Floyd I feel like driving an icepick through my ears. Normal, distinct songs on normal albums don't cause me to suffer like this. And the reason you hear about it in Slashdot is because geeks tend to like stoner garbage.

      Fixed.

  87. Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the XBox360 plus the optional wireless accessory (with the included media center + xbox marketplace) offers similar functionality as iTV. And I reckon Xbox360 has better games.

    So I do not see what the amazing innovation is.

    I havent seen Zune yet, who knows what it can and can't do.

    1. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by rapier1 · · Score: 1

      The amazing innovation is marketing.

    2. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by protohiro1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You make a classic mistake when analyzing Apple or Tivo whatever. They aren't selling the features, because EVERYONE has the same features. They are selling the interface or rather complete user experience. This system will certainly be easy easy. Ok, you have itunes installed. Next step, plug in the iTV to the wall. Then plug the wires to your tv, which will be just like hooking up a VCR. Ok...now I'm done! I can use the itunes interface to buy, which I understand, and the movies I want will show up on my TV. Not only is it simple, but it doesn't break the user's metaphor for how these things work. My movies are on my computer, but I can play them on my TV.

      Xbox 360 breaks the metaphor. Ok, so I want to buy a movie. I plug in my xbox 360 (wait...isn't that for games?) then I go to the movie store on the xbox. I browse and press download. Ok...where are my movies living now? On the xbox? Uhhh..ok...but what if I turn off the xbox?

      A savvy user knows the answer to these questions. Of course the xbox is just like your pc, and I'm sure the xbox movie download will work great. But the issue here is that the experience seems a little more confusing, just a little harder to deal with. And that is a major marketing hurdle. Tivo and Apple overcame consumer resistance to tech that savvy people were never afraid to use. The Tivo is so easy to deal with the consumer loses their fear of using a computer to record shows, which sounds too complex. The previous barrier to mp3 player adoption was the complexity in sorting music and getting it on the device. Apple combined ideas and features everyone else already had in a way that wasn't too indimitating for average users. Now, in the consumer's mind an ipod is something they can use. Apple comes around with a thing that is like an ipod for your tv. Easy. The consumer will not be afraid of this because they already have an idea of how this works (of course, they are wrong about that, but that doesn't matter). It will make sense to people, the fear of complexity is easy to overcome here. Microsoft (or sony or amazon or whoever) has a major hill to climb. The first user objection to the Amazon system is "how does it get on my TV?". The objection to the xBox 360 is that people think of it as a game console and using it to download movies is going to sound complex, even if it isn't. Most consumers didn't want Tivo because they hadn't seen it and it sounded too hard. Tivo caught on once enough people had it that people could see how easy it was and lose that fear. So like a sibling poster said, the major innovation here is marketing, followed up by products that deliver as promised. Apple marketing convinces people that they CAN use an ipod. Then the product actually is easy enough to use that it meets this expectation.

      Let's be serious...microsoft does not have a reputation for ease of use.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    3. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      "Xbox 360 breaks the metaphor. Ok, so I want to buy a movie. I plug in my xbox 360 (wait...isn't that for games?) then I go to the movie store on the xbox. I browse and press download. Ok...where are my movies living now? On the xbox? Uhhh..ok...but what if I turn off the xbox?"

      Don't know why you assume this. The XBox360 is a multifunction device so you'll need to set it into media extender mode (or buy a fixed function extender just like the iTV). After that, there's no reason the experience will be any different than Apple's. You assume that the mac user buys his movie through iTunes and then assume that the XBox owner does not. Why? The Xbox owner can buy his movie on the PC just as well. Even the interface shown in the iTV looks suspeciously like Media Center.

      "But the issue here is that the experience seems a little more confusing..."

      How can you possibly know that? The iTV isn't even shipping and MS isn't selling movies yet (unless you count Amazon). You're just making this crap up.

      "The previous barrier to mp3 player adoption was the complexity in sorting music and getting it on the device."

      There you go making stuff up again. mp3 players were in their early adoption phase when Apple entered the market. Apple didn't do anything differently, they just made players that were prettier. Agreed that MusicMatch was a POS but iTunes was not "easier to use" than other jukeboxes fundamentally. The barrier at that time was simply unfamiliarity and lack of quality products in the market.

      "Apple comes around with a thing that is like an ipod for your tv. Easy. The consumer will not be afraid of this because they already have an idea of how this works..."

      More crap you're just imagining and stating as though it were fact. The iTV hasn't shipped and hasn't proven itself to anyone. The fact is that it's simply Apple's me-too version of the media extender which MS has already do and brought to market. Nothing we have seen so far demonstrates that it's better than the Windows equivalent. It may be but we have to wait and see.

      "The objection to the xBox 360 is that people think of it as a game console and using it to download movies is going to sound complex, even if it isn't."

      That's because you've assumed how it works even thought it doesn't.

      "So like a sibling poster said, the major innovation here is marketing..."

      Except he was being sarcastic.

      "Let's be serious...microsoft does not have a reputation for ease of use."

      Yes, more clever marketing from Apple.

      I have used Media Center and I have an XBox 360. Frankly, Media Center sucks but it's miles ahead of Apple's equivalent right now. iTV changes nothing. I would prefer a mac that's suited to connect to the living room TV via 1080i or 1080p and offer better storage options than the mini. If they offered that they'd stand a chance of actually being better than MCE.

    4. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      The point I was trying to make was no one cares what you or I think. We are the minority in the market. The fact is Microsoft may have media extender and it may well be the easiest thing in the world to use. If it is that great I might consider using it myself. But That doesn't make it a success in the marketplace. I just think that Apple has a better chance of selling something like this. No, we don't know what the iTV is going to be like.

      "That's because you've assumed how it works even thought it doesn't."
      Yes, that's the point I was trying to make. This is how things sell, not based on their ACTUAL merits, but their percieved merits. I know it sucks but its a fact. People pay 2-5x as much for Bose stuff. It isn't better. But that really doesn't matter in the end.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    5. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you certainly made some absolute statements, some of which aren't supported by facts. For example:

      "This system will certainly be easy easy."
      "Not only is it simple, but it doesn't break the user's metaphor for how these things work.""
      "Xbox 360 breaks the metaphor."
      "then I go to the movie store on the xbox. I browse and press download."
      "But the issue here is that the experience seems a little more confusing, just a little harder to deal with."
      "Apple comes around with a thing that is like an ipod for your tv." ...

      Yes, it's a fact that Apple has their ease-of-use schtick down to a fine art, and when you look at the solution they're putting together it looks suspiciously like what MS has been trying to do only longer. Apple will market their way into convincing buyers that they are somehow unique and innovative with iTV even though it's a clone of an MS product. There's plenty of evidence that many here have already been duped.

      Ultimately, if Apple's iTV product and their iTunes/Frontrow software all work together well then they will lead in the market. MCE works horribly but MS has already had 3 versions of it and is about to release its fourth. Personally, I don't want an extender like iTV. I want to browse on the HD TV itself. I want a mac that can record or interface with the new TIVO, that looks like a stereo component, and has 2 3.5" hard drive bays.

    6. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by LKM · · Score: 1
      The amazing innovation is marketing.

      And usability (no contest), pricing (iTV vs. Xbox), image (Apple is quite simply cooler than Microsoft), DRM (Apple's is less unacceptable) and content (Apple is able to get it)

      All in all, Apple's solution is cheaper, more convenient and cooler.

    7. Re:Why not?? Xbox360 + MCE= iTV by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Except that with the iTV, it doesn't sound like you have a F-16 jet fighter plane in your living room.

      Not to mention that iTV only requires a free download (iTunes 7). Using an Xbox 360 would also require a PC with Windows Media Center Edition if I'm not mistaken.

      So, iTV is not an amazing innovation (I've been waiting for that box for 3 years myself), but the whole integration will be what makes it worthwhile. And to be honest, 299$USD for that box is quite expensive. I'd like to buy a model without HDMI, without optical audio outputs and without wireless (ethernet, components and RCA stereo is enough for my setup).

      How about an "iTV" and "iTV Pro", Apple?

  88. The Long Tail of games by C_Lo_Fresh · · Score: 1

    Apple needs to release an SDK for iPod games.

  89. CD Text Support? by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

    Please tell me they finally added CD Text support when burning music files from your library! This is my biggest gripe with iTunes. Gapless playback is my second biggest gripe, but it looks like that has been addressed.

    1. Re:CD Text Support? by mattwardfh · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's under the Advanced preferences, for burning.

  90. Mod Parent Up! (was Re:DRM) by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

    This was the first thing I wondered about when I heard about the new release, and I've now seen it confirmed on several relevant forums. I've held back from upgrading iTunes for over a year now so it would be possible to easily strip the DRM from the music I purchased. I guess there's no reason not to install the new version, now, but I'm deeply disappointed in this development, and it will certainly alter my song purchasing decisions in the future.

    --
    The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  91. iTV and DRM helmet by haggie · · Score: 2, Funny

    This product will have so much DRM built into it that it will know when you have guests over and will shut down the movie/TV show so your "criminal" friends can't "pirate" a movie by sitting on your couch and watching it with you.

  92. Bucky Bucks by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    In the immortal words of Bucky Bucks (from "Drawn Together"):

    "Ugh... ah... oooh! It's gonna be big one! TWO TOWELS!"

    Cool.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  93. Haven't we seen this before? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 0, Troll

    If the best Apple can come up with is to reuse old designs then there's isn't much hope for the company.

    Although, I'm sure the new iPod Nano will sell well given the way people obsess company regardless of what Apple does. After all, only Apple can take something that's been around for a few years and present it as something new and innovative.

  94. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    It doesn't appear that you can record *anything* with the iTV. I only saw outputs, no inputs on the back panel.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
  95. Some new features good, some omissions bad by pattokun · · Score: 1

    There's a new tag in the Track Info pane -- "Album Artist". Anyone got any ideas on why this was added and how it can be used? It seems like it might help with the situation whereby if you have, for example, an album on which several tracks are collaborations with other artists, then in the Artist list you end up with one entry for Artist 1, one for Artist 1/Artist 2, one for Artist 2/Artist 3... One thing that instantly jumped out at me -- they seem to have removed the option to keep an iPod in the Source list while it's not plugged in. I used this feature constantly, to check what I had added to my Shuffle and put Podcasts and new songs on that I wanted to update when I next Synced it. Now I have to go and get it and plug it in just to see what's on it. Bummer. But I love the new interface, and I'm glad that they seem to have bought or somehow included the CoverFlow tech demo that was floating around a few months ago, rather than creating another Konfabulator kerfuffle.

  96. Who cares about 5% by klubar · · Score: 1

    Why is it that 5% (or less) marketshare for Apple computers is hugely important, yet when other MP3 music players have 5% share it doesn't matter? Apple has only 70% of the music player market (depends on what you include)... that means the competition must have 30%.

    Microsoft has 95% of the PC OS market... why should anyone care about OS X with less than 5%?

    1. Re:Who cares about 5% by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why is it that 12% (or less) marketshare for Apple computers is hugely important.
      Microsoft has 85% of the PC OS market.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Who cares about 5% by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      I suppose 5% is less than 12%.

      http://macslash.org/article.pl?sid=06/07/21/131722 3

      "Why is it that 100% (or less) marketshare for Apple computers..." is equally correct.

  97. the hardware exists... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    there are a few people that make the interface hardware. http://www.elgato.com/ has been at it for a while. i just saw on a few weeks ago that is the same footprint as a Mac Mini and has the TV tunercard as well as AV in/out. it hooks to the Mini via USB2 or firewire (i think USB2 actually?). sorry i forget the details, but if i remember right it is made by a 3rd party, and support is provided by the people at El Gato (it runs their software). i don't see it on their website though..... hmmmm

  98. Even the iPod is *teh snappY* now (VGA Playback) by OlivierB · · Score: 1

    I purchased one of the TV shows in the iTunes Store. Files are noticeably bigger at 500Mb for 40 mins.
    The video is way better quality than the QVGA we used to have.
    What's even better is that these 640*480 1.5Mbs h264 videos playback just fine on the iPod. What's the trick? was there an artificial limitation on playback capabilities? or is there an embedded file in the video itself?

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
  99. iTunes Phone Driver by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 1

    Anyone else notice that (at least on OS X) when you install iTunes and click "customize" there is a grayed out option to install the "iTunes Phone Driver?"

  100. Re:Apple == Big Brother by Omestes · · Score: 1

    Apple is in your car

    Am I the only person who misread this as:

    Apple is in your cat?

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  101. Finally - reverse sync and roaming sync by yoshac · · Score: 1

    Finally, you can sync from ipod to PC/MAc and roam one ipod syncing to multiple (itunes authorized) machines.

  102. So can you burn these movies or transfer them? by DrXym · · Score: 0

    If not then the service stinks as much as Amazon's. In some ways more so since at least Amazon allows you to "rent" the movie (i.e. own it for 30 days).

  103. Re:Even the iPod is *teh snappY* now (VGA Playback by Bassman59 · · Score: 1
    What's even better is that these 640*480 1.5Mbs h264 videos playback just fine on the iPod. What's the trick? was there an artificial limitation on playback capabilities? or is there an embedded file in the video itself?
    Larger files means that the processor has to do less decompression.
  104. Where's the PowerPC's? by oldsyd · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed the Apple Store is no longer listing the PowerPC based Power Mac Quad G5? Last week, it was there, hidden low on the left hand column, now it's gone. Sounds like big news that Apple has now officially dumped all PowerPC based desktops from the store (except the refurbs)

    1. Re:Where's the PowerPC's? by ioErr · · Score: 1

      It's actually old news. They announced that they had completed the switch to Intel processors back when they announced the Mac Pro's. After that they've just been selling what PPC machines they still had left.

  105. Older 5G iPods? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I thought their H.264 limitations were a bit lower than what's being sold now on the store. Do these videos only work on the ones announced today?

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  106. What Set top box? by GigG · · Score: 1

    Where is the info on the Set Top Box?

    --
    Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
  107. ROKR Phone Driver by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    That's for Motorola ROKR (ie, the "iTunes Phone") support.

  108. Scratches on the Nano by Botia · · Score: 1

    Any word yet on if the new Nano scratches like the old one? I had to buy a big neoprene cover with acrylic to protect the screen on my old Nano as after five minutes of use the screen was almost destroyed. I'm hoping they've fixed this issue.

    The other improvements (brighter screen, 8GB of memory, etc.) are all nice. The real issue, however, is the scratching.

    1. Re:Scratches on the Nano by RMingin · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're supposed to use your finger to push the buttons, not protruding pieces of furniture. I'm pretty rough on my electronics, but I also decline to operate them via hammers and chisels, so my PSP and iPod have gotten through a year and over three years with minor cosmetic scuffs at most. Don't use hammers to hit the buttons. You'll be fine if you avoid that.

      --
      The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    2. Re:Scratches on the Nano by Botia · · Score: 1

      Lol, pretty funny. I wish that was the case. All I did was put it in my pocket (nothing else in there) to listen to one song. The case I got more than doubles the size of it, but I can read the screen.

  109. Itunes not supporting AAC+ streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Itunes 7 still doesn't support streaming AAC+ yet it plays AAC+ video files.. bizarre

    ie http://radio.internode.on.net:8120/

  110. Java Scrollbars? by Augusto · · Score: 1

    "Java scrollbars" look like whatever the scrollbars look like in the OS you are using them. What in the world are you talking about?

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:Java Scrollbars? by jmc · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you are absolutely correct. That was a reference to the original poster, and I believe we were both referring to the Swing toolkit that used to epitomize ugly Java applications.

    2. Re:Java Scrollbars? by Augusto · · Score: 1

      You're probably talking about the Swing look and feel, it's a minor nitpick, but it looks just like whatever your desktop is running as (XP=XP toolbar).

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  111. OSS 3D breaks iTunes 7 by myBotPiko · · Score: 1

    Just a small note.
    When I started iTunes 7 for the first time it just wouldn't play any music. The problem was the sound plugin OSS 3D which I had to remove for everything to work again :)

    Just have to wait for the OSS 3D developers to adapt their plugin for iTunes 7 now....

  112. Not Enough Memory by ghort · · Score: 1

    After a clean reboot, I get:

    "The iTunes application could not be opened. There is not enough memory available."

    screenshot here: http://flickr.com/photos/ghort/241816410/

    It's a 1GB MBP. My itunes library file is 60MB.

  113. iTunes 7...sigh by BRSQUIRRL · · Score: 1

    I really wanted to like iTunes 7 after reading the notes from the presentation but after actually installing it, I discovered some gotchas:

    * I thought they had finally given iTunes the ability to sync an iPod to/from multiple computers. It turns out that the new "reverse sync" only works on songs purchased from the iTunes store. Blegh.

    * So...given the above problem, I was back to where I was previously (plugging the iPod into my work PC and listening through iTunes). That still works, but the nifty new "grouped" and "cover browser" views aren't available when listening to tracks on the iPod.

    * After upgrading, I moved the newly created Start menu folders into a subfolder (as I do with all apps, to keep XP's "All Programs" list from getting too cluttered). I closed iTunes and then relaunched it a few minutes later. It recreated the "iTunes" folder in my Start menu. Oh tell me you didn't just do that... C'mon Apple...

  114. Re:No movie burning? Meh by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    Why not just plug your iPod into the TV? That seems like a better idea all-around.

  115. Re:Consumerism by LMariachi · · Score: 1
    How is it fundamentally different than any other company's hype? Just because Apple is better at it? I'm a lot more offended by companies that deliver shoddy products than I am by a company that effectively advertises its quality wares.

    Does our culture place too much emphasis on shopping and consumption? Of course. But as long as that's the prevalent culture we live in, isn't it preferable to have good Stuff than just-barely-good-enough-if-that Stuff? Maybe I'm naïve, but I think that the more people are exposed to quality and functionality, the more they will value those aspects over novelty and status and bling. From there, mindless consumerism gives way to judicious discernment.

  116. Apple + Nintendo + TiVo!! by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    Apple + Nintendo + TiVo!!

    Come on guys! Get together! Make even cooler stuff!

    Yeah I'm off topic. Screw the karma.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  117. CoverFlow by earthbound+kid · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the website of the old CoverFlow.app, they did in fact sell their software to Apple, and that's what's being used in iTunes 7. Good for them. I bet they're glad they didn't end up like Watson or, to a less extent, Konfabulator (though they did manage to get bought out by Yahoo!).

  118. iTV - or ITV?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so - the new media box is going to be called "iTV" - im just wondering what the largest independent supplier of television here in the UK will make of that?

    1. Re:iTV - or ITV?? by mei_mei_mei · · Score: 1

      Well with any luck they'll stop Apple using their name, which they've operated under for many years in a very similar market.

  119. Set-top box? I so called this on /.! by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    "And Steve Jobs gave a sneak preview of a project code-named iTV: a Mac Mini-like wireless set-top box."

    I said that exact thing was coming out last friday on /.!: "a iTunes enabled DVD media player with hard drive for ~$199 that connects directly to your TV and has built-in wifi to connect to your existing broadband router."

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  120. If this is true..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good, now if this gets worked into the next iPod update(didn't see any when I looked for updates), maybe it will work with my video pod and I don't have to re-encoded all my gapless mp3s.

    I was doing it though ChapterTool, but that thing hasn't been updated in ages, is Mac only, adding "info tags" wasn't simple and the documentation was seriously lacking.

    As for iTunes 7, wow they really cleaned some of the GUI stuff up, but some stuff needs work (i.e. even when sorting by album, redundant album art and unnecessary "barred off" sections for artists on a CD with more then one artist. This was for stuff with a plain old "artist" ID3 tag.). Also nice to have it not take forever to realize the networked drive is off...

    Heh, and I kind of doubt it will have album artwork for a few of the CDs I own. Maybe if they work out the other kinks I might use it more then foobar2000.

    Hummm... What is this, "My store" option on the bottom in ITMS with all sorts of different countries listed? Are songs in other countries stores going to opened up and be available to us?

  121. ahh differences by crabpeople · · Score: 1

    "Can we please just get everything looking consistent again Apple? Please?"

    Their motto is to continuously "think different" so I don't know how its surprising to have a redesign. If you want continuity and stability I offer to you the awesomeness that is winamp!
    No change to the default look in almost 10 years. Now *THATS* consistant!

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  122. iTunues Sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems iTunes 7 won't play nice with iTunes 6 when it comes to sharing... kind of expected.

  123. View/organize by album cover: ripped off Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The new music view/organize modes in iTunes are great. One is divided by albums, showing a small image of the album cover along with all the tracks. The other looks like they licensed "Cover Flow", it looks like flipping through albums in your old physical collection. Definitely better visual feedback then scrolling through a huge text list of songs.
    I'm kidding about Apple ripping off Microsoft (organizing by album art is so obvious), but you all know Apple fanatics would be accusing MS of ripping off Apple if Microsoft implemented their album art view and stacks view after Apple showed their implementation today.
  124. The lockout might be on purpose by tepples · · Score: 1
    Apple needs to release an SDK for iPod games.

    For the same reason Sony needs to release an SDK for PSP games?

  125. Lockout chip business model by tepples · · Score: 1
    Where's the SDK?

    Where's the public PlayStation 2, Xbox, GameCube, or PSP SDK? Even BREW cell phones have a lockout chip.

    1. Re:Lockout chip business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. What's strange is that even if it's completely proprietary and locked-out, there was no advance solicitation of developers to produce titles. Are all these games in-house? If you're willing to sign an NDA and sell thru iTunes, how do you get on the bandwagon?

    2. Re:Lockout chip business model by tepples · · Score: 1
      What's strange is that even if it's completely proprietary and locked-out, there was no advance solicitation of developers to produce titles.

      Apple might have contacted developers of established franchises (notice it's Tetris(tm) and Bejeweled(tm), not Lockjaw and some Bejeweled clone)

  126. Cover Art for my ripped CDs! Yay! by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    Just that one feature totally rocks. w00t dee d00t!

    Gapless playback doesn't suck either.

    1. Re:Cover Art for my ripped CDs! Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope they really are *your* CDs, since you have to log in to your iTunes account and tell the iTMS the entire contents of your iTunes library. Anybody read the new & improved iTunes 7.0 EULA? Anything about *not* reporting your 40,000-song library to the RIAA?

  127. Re:No movie burning? Meh by vitaboy · · Score: 1

    You're thinking is so '90s. From Apple's perspective, burning to DVD is so last year. The iPod is the portable media device of choice, since movies can be synched to any number of iPods.

    Just think of music, and the percentage of people who rely on the CD-burning feature compared to people who are used to the idea that the iPod has replaced the CD.

  128. First time ever? by chochos · · Score: 1

    This is the first time that I see the Apple homepage with no images at all, just the tabs. Have we finally slashdotted Apple? or did their webmaster screw up or what?

  129. New shuffle cute but not a USB key anymore by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Informative

    The old shuffle had its USB interface built in, and you could use it as a USB key to take some data with you. Now you have to carry along a dock. This is less geek-friendly.

    1. Re:New shuffle cute but not a USB key anymore by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

      Yep.
      The old Shuffle is often used as a USB key.

      I would have been happier if they have shortened and thinned it a bit, but left the USB plug at the end.
      And released 2 & 4GB versions, so it could be used as a Serious USB key, as well as playing music.

  130. Winamp & matroska by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it doesn't play matroska video files.
    That was the end of my 9 years relationship with Winamp.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    1. Re:Winamp & matroska by leoPetr · · Score: 1

      I think it plays them with the right codecs installed and the file extension manually set to open with WinAmp, but I am not at home right now and cannot check.

      --
      My other body is also not wearing any.
  131. Re:No movie burning? Meh by ejp1082 · · Score: 1

    Why would the masses love having yet-another-device to plug into their TV sets (carrying a $200-300 price tag) whose only function is to play a proprietary movie format that's of lesser quality than the DVD's they get for the same price (and already have players for?)

    And why the heck would Apple release something with a Tivo functionality? They want to sell you TV re-runs, not let you record them.

    I see the masses continuing to buy DVD's for a long time coming, if these initial lame efforts at downloadable movies are any indication.

  132. WARNING! iTunes v7.0.0.70 vs. Win2K pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    a quick note to let others running iTunes on Windows 2000 pro NOT to download & install the new iTunes just yet. I only get an error message after the EULA, re. app. cannot be started, unknown error, errcode #0x666D743F. I don't know about others, am monitoring mac-centric websites just in case.

    will investigate this further, but for now, win2k users should wait a few days. i am right now re-installing iTunes v6.0.5, hoping none of my music got wiped out.

    1. Re:WARNING! iTunes v7.0.0.70 vs. Win2K pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quick & short follow-up: re-installing iTunes v6.0.5 showed that nothing (music + 1 video file) was wiped out. Though the Apple Software Updater that came with iTv7 is still there: oddly enough, when run, it says that my software is up-to-date (and I am running iT v6 + older QT?!?). Hmm. Odd.

    2. Re:WARNING! iTunes v7.0.0.70 vs. Win2K pro by yoshac · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem, but only when connecting remotely to the PC using desktop sharing.

      May be related to audio/video driver capabilities.

    3. Re:WARNING! iTunes v7.0.0.70 vs. Win2K pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, googling with "itunes error 0x666D743F" yields two results that are audio driver related, albeit indirectly (firewire audio device).

      I am using an ASUS A7N8X Deluxe v2 (with the nVidia SoundStorm hardware): this would be the first time this hardware *might* be problematic for me.

      I wonder if using XP instead of 2000 might make a difference.

      Still digging...

  133. The innovation that Unbox is missing: Frontrow by iendedi · · Score: 1
    I understand what anamorphic is. My main point is that for $15 we get video that isn't even as good as DVD (and I rarely pay more than $15 for a DVD). I'm disppointed in the sense that it would have been nice to stream HD (720P) video to either of my HDTVs using the iTV and its HDMI output.

    At least it doesn't seem like the joke that Amazon Unbox video is.
    I agree with you on both points. The videos should be 480p and there is absolutely no excuse for any of these films being released with stereo encoding. I will not order one of these films until they have surround sound encoded audio. Period.

    However, I also agree with some of the posters that this is a temporary situation. We will see HD content as soon as Steve can deliver it. I suspect that a big part of the holdup is with the other studios. They are already balking about the price and I'm sure they would freak out about high-definition content (or any quality advantage over DVDs and perhaps even parity) at these price-points. Of course, they are making a grave mistake with that mindset because they have stripped users of resellability of content as well as fair use. Steve is probably pulling his typical genius manuevers on them. He will release this content now, get some of the studios to sign, show them that he can force people to pay for content twice by upgrading quality and use that to get concessions out of them for HD. [ My theory ]

    Yea, it's messy. The studios are evil - they really have a hostility problem towards their customers.

    But I do have a point to make: The reason that this scheme will work is that Steve's plan has a new value proposition that has more or less never been seen before (the closest is DirecTivo caching PPV movies). With the new Front-Row box it becomes possible to sit on your couch and surf through your movie collection and (presumably) watch previews and order new films for your collection all with your remote. It is simply the most eloquent PPV system ever conceived and it turns your mac or PC into a media server on the sly. iTunes is the media server. Everyone will fall in love with the experience, but it won't happen until January (shame, that - would have been a great Christmas gift).

    Amazon Unbox really is (unbox - no box, no Front-Row). All the disadvantages with none of the advantages. Sad, really.

    The things that I would love to see, but for obvious reasons probably never will:
    * $0.49 upgrade of already owned content (e.g. 720p comes out and I can upgrade movies for $0.49 to pay for Apple's bandwidth or whatever) * $0.49 different encoding charge in general (e.g. let me download the 640x272 H.264 at 700kps instead of 1.5mbps because my network is slow or I will only watch it on my iPod)
    * Let me burn the damned thing to DVD
    * Ripping directly into iTunes from my DVD collection (I don't care if the result is a FairPlay encoded H.264, I just want to toss my DVDs and be able to select from my entire DVD collection in Front-Row - I want the default behavior of sticking a DVD movie into my mac to be to RIP it, not to play it)

    Ah well... I was really hoping for an iPhone today, This fake commercial had me all orgasmic and stuff.
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  134. Re:View/organize by album cover: ripped off Micros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that looks like crap. Go have a look at the new iTunes interface.

    Or look up 'CoverFlow'

    Either way, this is new, and nothing like that half-assed solution from MS.

  135. "no-K" compression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only Apple new that I like 10 minute songs, 4096x3072 pics, and 3 hour movies.

    I don't think your "no-K" compression scheme is going to be enough to fit your media on the drive.

  136. iTunes account for downloading cover art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I have no intention of entering a CC or PayPal account to register with the iTunes store, but would like cover art from iTunes. Does anyone have an iTunes account with an invalid credit card # (or closed PayPal acct, etc) that I could use to download cover art?

  137. Re:View/organize by album cover: ripped off Micros by rgbscan · · Score: 1

    Yeah but this is shipping software.... MS is still in beta....

  138. Aaah! by CdBee · · Score: 1

    - please meet our chairman

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  139. Gapless Playback in the 5th Gen by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    Gapless Payck for iPod! Wonder if they will update the 5th gen with this?? Please???

    I've just upgraded mine. Officially it's now gapless. To my ear, it's very close, but not quite there. Then again, the tiny gap in the drumloop of Leftfield's Space Shanty drives me nuts and it's probably even shorter. (My music is currently in 128kbps LAME encoded MP3 format, and I'm pretty sure that the lower the bitrate is, the shorter the gap is.)

    At any rate, for gapless playback, upgrade iTunes to version 7. Then hilight whichever songs you want to be gapless (Apple-A for all of them), right click (or control-click), then select "Get Info." In the bottom is "Gapless Album." Just change it to "Yes."

    You'll also need to update your 5G iPod's firmware by clicking on "iTunes" in the file menu, then "Check for Updates." The rest should be automated.

  140. Agree Completely by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. If I can't burn to a standard DVD disc that will play on any DVD player, then I'm not interested. If I can't archive my movie purchases, or take them over to a friend's house or somewhere and play on their DVD player, then this is totally worthless. I'm not interested in a video iPod (my nano will be fine for another couple years), and I'm definitely not buying an iTV output device for the living room, so this is a dud for me. If they had let me burn the movies to DVD-R and play on standard DVD players, then I would bite; but the current service terms are unacceptable.

    --
    "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  141. Apple = Fight Club by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    Apple is in your den
    Apple is in your living room
    Apple is in your car
    Apple is in your pocket

    What's next?

    I thought they were going more for the Fight Club angle - "We cook your meals, we drive your ambulances. We connect your calls, we guard you while you sleep. Do not fuck with us."

  142. OK by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    Then the resolution drops to 640*400 or whatever the particular aspect ratio is. So much for "four times the resolution of the iPod".

    1. Re:OK by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Isn't an iPod screen 320x200? In which case, 640x400 would be exactly four times the resolution of the iPod...

  143. Baseless paranoia? Why, mod it up, of course! by small_axe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you try to download album art for a particular song, iTunes throws up a message box saying that they don't collect personal information. If you're the sort who thinks this is a bald-faced lie, then what's to stop Apple from phoning home the entire collection without any interaction on the user's part at all? Why wait for the user to request album art?

    1. Re:Baseless paranoia? Why, mod it up, of course! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If you're the sort who thinks this is a bald-faced lie, then what's to stop Apple from phoning home the entire collection without any interaction on the user's part at all? Why wait for the user to request album art?

      Users with a firewall would notice the program trying to phone home, and would raise a stink about it. But they won't raise a stink if they actually tell the program to "phone home" themselves.

  144. Timing, it would appear, is everything by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    Interesting that they did a preview of a product they're not ready to formally announce yet. Rather uncharacteristic.

    Ah, but this product is the first of its kind, not an upgrade. Therefore people won't put off buying something similar until it comes out. Basically, Apple know how to avoid the Osborne effect, which doesn't apply to this product.

    1. Re:Timing, it would appear, is everything by Fengpost · · Score: 1

      Or rather, Apple is applying the Osbourne effect to the other multimedia streaming appliances or or media center PC for Xmas.

      --
      The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity....Calvin
  145. Applications are different... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    They should look different. Looking different isn't bad if they work well.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  146. solution to keeping you both happy... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    steal one.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  147. Re:The innovation that Unbox is missing: Frontrow by dwette · · Score: 1

    Ultimately, what I really want is streaming HD video on demand, delivered reasonably cheap. It doesn't have to be something I keep. If I could pay $1 (maybe $2) to stream a movie to my TV(s) in high definition for, say, 2-3 days that would be awesome. I collect DVDs, but doubt I have any one I've watched 10 times.

    I know it's a pipe dream, but maybe in the future when they sort out the delivery issues.

    In the meantime, I'm not buying into anything new that isn't high definition (and definitely not a technology that has competing, incompatable formats either a.k.a. HD-DVD vs. BRD). For standard edef (480p) I have an awesome DVD player, and at that video resolution DVD is not broken (except for the stupid anti-piracy stuff) and needs no replacement/alternate.

  148. They finally broke the 5.x shopping cart by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    This sucks, being forced to upgrade to keep using the store.

  149. Re:No movie burning? Meh by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    Really? That sounds embarassing to me. I'd love to see Steve Jobs demo that process. :-)

  150. Gapless Playback Notes by Van+Halen · · Score: 4, Informative
    I've had a chance to play with this a bit, and here are my findings, using a couple of test files with a seamless transition in between. Previously, every method of playback produced a gap (or so I believed).
    • Within iTunes 7: no gap
    • iTunes 6: gap
    • 1 GB iPod shuffle, firmware 1.1.4 (iTunes says it's up to date): gap
    • 30 GB 5th generation iPod with video, firmware 1.1 (iTunes says it's up to date): gap
    • iTunes 6, outputting to Airport Express: NO GAP! Huh? I did not expect this at all. The same files always have a gap when outputting to that computer's speakers in iTunes 6. I tried old backups of those songs that hadn't been touched by iTunes 7, still no gap for the Airport Express, gap for the computer speakers. Weird.
    • iTunes 7, outputting to Airport Express: could not get iTunes 7 to connect to the AE. Anyone else have this problem?

    For the people who've reported gapless playback in existing generation iPods, can you double check? Any further details? Firmware versions? Won't work for me. I guess I'll have to listen to one of the new iPods in store before purchasing.
    1. Re:Gapless Playback Notes by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      Your iPod software is out of date. 1.2 for 5th Gen.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  151. Typo: slow transfer isn't an issue by dangitman · · Score: 1

    *not an issue*

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  152. Volume Logic + iTunes 7 by dlim · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a warning. The iTunes 7 update appears to break my Volume Logic plugin. You may not want to upgrade if you use Volume Logic.

  153. Gapless Playback Notes Updated by Van+Halen · · Score: 2, Informative
    And wouldn't you know it, just after posting this, iTunes pops up with the 1.2 firmware update for the 5th generation iPod. 1.2 does indeed remove the gap. Updated findings:
    • iTunes 7: no gap
    • iTunes 7 to Airport Express: could not connect (no error message)
    • iTunes 6, regardless of whether files were touched by iTunes 7: gap
    • iTunes 6 to Airport Express, regardless of whether files were touched by iTunes 7: no gap
    • 1 GB iPod shuffle, firmware 1.1.4 (iTunes says it's up to date): gap
    • 30 GB 5th generation iPod with video, firmware 1.1 (NOT the latest!): gap
    • 30 GB 5th generation iPod with video, firmware 1.2 (latest): no gap

    I seriously doubt the shuffle will ever support gapless, but I'm still wondering about the Airport Express problem. iTunes 6 connects just fine to the same unit that iTunes 7 won't talk to. iTunes 7 sees it, but nothing happens when you select it.
    1. Re:Gapless Playback Notes Updated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably have IPv6 disabled for your ethernet/airport connection in the System Preferences. Turn it back on and it will work.

    2. Re:Gapless Playback Notes Updated by Van+Halen · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that worked. But why? I see no reason to require IPv6 here. The same Airport Express works fine with iTunes 6 and IPv4. It's only the combination of iTunes 7 and IPv4 that seems to be broken. I can't imagine any reason why this should be. I specifically turned off IPv6 because I don't use it for anything. Bah.

    3. Re:Gapless Playback Notes Updated by CatOne · · Score: 1

      *shrug*

      Don't know *why* it requires this. But it is a known issue, and enabling IPv6 is the solution ;-)

  154. But how are they making it gapless? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    I'm still looking for more details on how Apple is implementing gapless playback. Since it reportedly works for older iPods as well, it appears that iTunes is somehow quietly modified the mp3s, which I find a bit alarming. What is it they are doing to files to make them gapless? How is it different that Lame's gapless strategy, which never worked for iPods before? Is it going to affect how my mp3s play back in other programs? Perhaps they are actually creating merged versions of the mp3s themselves? What exactly is going on here?

    1. Re:But how are they making it gapless? by vapspwi · · Score: 1

      The actual MP3 files don't appear to have been "touched" by the process (the modified dates didn't change), so I don't think it's messing with anything there. Maybe it's storing some information in its database for each file? I'm not really sure, but I'm very curious what it's doing. I'm not sure it's actually working in iTunes 7 for me, but I haven't done exhaustive testing. Still waiting for the 1.2 iPod software update to show up, too...

      JRjr

  155. Re:The innovation that Unbox is missing: Frontrow by dfghjk · · Score: 1

    "However, I also agree with some of the posters that this is a temporary situation. We will see HD content as soon as Steve can deliver it."

    Perhaps, but the same is true for "Steve"'s competitors.

    "Steve is probably pulling his typical genius manuevers on them."

    Haha

    "With the new Front-Row box it becomes possible to sit on your couch and surf through your movie collection and (presumably) watch previews and order new films for your collection all with your remote.It is simply the most eloquent PPV system ever conceived and it turns your mac or PC into a media server on the sly."

    Frontrow is Apple's weakminded copy of MCE that can't do recording. What you're referring to is iTV. iTV is far from "the most eloquent PPV system ever conceived", it's in fact a direct copy of Microsoft Media Center extender.

    "Amazon Unbox really is (unbox - no box, no Front-Row). All the disadvantages with none of the advantages. Sad, really."

    Amazon may well be sad, but it's conceivable that it can use existing media center extenders and it could use them before Apple even gets iTV to market.

  156. Upgrade your old videos? by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So they increased the resolution from 320x240 to 640x480, very nice. But what about people who bought videos at the old resolution? Is there any way for them to download the newer version of those videos, or do they have to buy them again to get the higher resolution?

    1. Re:Upgrade your old videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They need to offer a 1 week "grace" period where videos can be upgraded, but I don't think that they will.

      The telltale is that they also removed the discount for purchasing an entire season of a TV show - you now have to buy episodes individually. It's a sneaky way for them to increase the price without changing the apparent cost (if you see what I mean). It also gives them an easy way to deny upgrades because you previously got a discount and the current product is "worth" more.

      For me, it only re-affirms that ripping a DVD to the format of your choice is the best way to avoid the idiotic thrashings of the media companies that only have their own interests in mind. Amazon.com's 2 day shipping on DVDs + Handbrake is a far better solution for end-users than buying anything from iTunes.

      And I'm also annoyed that my G5 iPod can suddenly play 640x480 movies with the new firmware update, when previously Apple had said that 480x480 was the max. So not only are my iTunes downloads now obsolete - so are the video files that I'd encoded myself. Grrr.

    2. Re:Upgrade your old videos? by psperneac · · Score: 1

      I've actually read somewhere that videos in the new upgraded resolution will be available for the people who bought them in the lower resolution.

    3. Re:Upgrade your old videos? by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Yeah..buy a DVD on Amazon for $14.99 (O'Brother Where art Thou? as a random comparison) then pay $6.48 for two-day shipping...then spend an hour or two converting it to play on your iPod.

      Or just pay $9.99 for it on iTunes and get it in 30 minutes in a format you can take on the road or play on your computer or TV (via iPod 5G with S-video connection).

      I'l go with saving over 50% and getting it in 30 minutes, not 2 days.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  157. Re:Even the iPod is *teh snappY* now (VGA Playback by NTiOzymandias · · Score: 1

    The iPod has always been able to play back high-res videos at a scaled-down resolution; I once verified this independently by encoding a couple of MP4s at some resolution higher than QVGA (I don't remember which exactly...) and sending them to iPod owners.

    The reason for the low resolution on the older iTMS videos was simply the fact that the content providers we know and love (*cough*) weren't ready at the time to commit to this newfangled internet distribution concept; Apple appealed to them by promising to use lower-quality versions of all the content, just so they could get -something- out the door. Now that the providers have seen it in action and the world hasn't ended, they appear to be warming up to it.

  158. Re:Apple == Big Brother by Skippy_kangaroo · · Score: 1

    Yes.

  159. Shouldn't compare Microsoft MCE to Front-Row by iendedi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Frontrow is Apple's weakminded copy of MCE that can't do recording. What you're referring to is iTV. iTV is far from "the most eloquent PPV system ever conceived", it's in fact a direct copy of Microsoft Media Center extender.
    Aside from a few MC*Es and Microsoft employees, I am aware of nobody who has ever (or would ever) connect their PC to their television. The problem with Microsoft zealots is far worse than Apple fanboys. The Apple fanboys go nuts over Apple products, without doubt, and annoyingly so at times. But they know something that "works" when they see it. Microsoft zealots delude themselves into believing that something that doesn't work, doesn't have legs and is heading nowhere slowly actually has a chance of survival. It is a mysterious phenomena.

    Front-Row is a product designed to be turned on and used with a remote with 5 buttons and no skills. The iTV (!!) box is designed and marketed to be plugged in to a television and used with no skills. It is also sold specifically to be attached to a TV to watch movies, it is not bundled into a general purpose PC guerilla marketing style by PHBs that mistakenly believe that once the user realizes he has a media center on his desktop that he will move his PC to the living room and attach it to his television.

    In comparison, MCE is something that is really only owned accidentally by people who don't even know they have it (because it was bundled with their PC from Best Buy), it requires the PC to be near the TV rather than on a desk and requires the user to know how to configure it and operate it with some crazy 300 button remote control (exaggeration, but the point is clearly made). It would probably require a class to get a user comfortable with the relationship between and configurations of MCE and Microsoft Media Player (and the derivitaves such as Amazon Unbox). It really doesn't matter if MCE can do any of the things that Front-Row does (which it really doesn't because Microsoft doesn't use zero-conf [bonjour] and whatnot). The simple fact is, it is not designed or marketed in a manner that will ever be used that way by the common man.

    To say that something *can* be done is not the same as saying that people *will* do it. You *can* write an assembly language CGI script library for publishing a Blog site. But I doubt you *will*...
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
    1. Re:Shouldn't compare Microsoft MCE to Front-Row by dfghjk · · Score: 0

      "Aside from a few MC*Es and Microsoft employees, I am aware of nobody who has ever (or would ever) connect their PC to their television."

      Now you know one. I have PCs connected to TVs in two locations. Each is running 1080. Prior to my current apartment I used one connected at 720p.

      "Microsoft zealots delude themselves into believing that something that doesn't work, doesn't have legs and is heading nowhere slowly actually has a chance of survival."

      By that comment, I hope you aren't referring to me. I know that MCE is a piece of crap. MCE and Frontrow are equivalents on the two platforms, however.

      "Front-Row is a product designed to be turned on and used with a remote with 5 buttons and no skills."

      MCE would be if it didn't also have TV tuner/DVR functions. Only Apple thinks that users can't use a remote with more than a few buttons.

      "The iTV (!!) box is designed and marketed to be plugged in to a television and used with no skills."

      Where did they say that? The media center extender is the same product.

      "It is also sold specifically to be attached to a TV to watch movies, it is not bundled into a general purpose PC guerilla marketing style by PHBs that mistakenly believe that once the user realizes he has a media center on his desktop that he will move his PC to the living room and attach it to his television."

      Yeah, well neither is media center extender. In fact, the two are identical products conceptually.

      "In comparison, MCE is something that is really only owned accidentally by people who don't even know they have it (because it was bundled with their PC from Best Buy), it requires the PC to be near the TV rather than on a desk and requires the user to know how to configure it and operate it with some crazy 300 button remote control (exaggeration, but the point is clearly made)."

      MCE does not require a TV to operate. It's remote is not unlike thousands of living room remotes that people have already.

      "It would probably require a class to get a user comfortable with the relationship between and configurations of MCE and Microsoft Media Player (and the derivitaves such as Amazon Unbox)."

      Umm no. When using MCE you don't use WMP. Apparently you know nothing about MCE.

      "It really doesn't matter if MCE can do any of the things that Front-Row does (which it really doesn't because Microsoft doesn't use zero-conf [bonjour] and whatnot)."

      We all know that bonjour is a knockout substitute for DVR and live TV functions that MCE provides. Get real.

      "The simple fact is, it is not designed or marketed in a manner that will ever be used that way by the common man."

      By common man I assume you mean the 5% mac user. Of that I am certain.

      "To say that something *can* be done is not the same as saying that people *will* do it. You *can* write an assembly language CGI script library for publishing a Blog site. But I doubt you *will*..."

      I have no idea what you're trying to say here, but I'd sure like to see you write a CGI script in assembly. I don't think you quite know what you're talking about there.

      First off, I was not the one to confuse Frontrow with iTV nor was I the one to make the senseless comparison between iTV and MCE (you were). You may believe that attaching a PC to a television is worthless but there are very good reasons for doing it and many failed attempts in the past (because TVs had horrible resolution). Now with HDTV and a sufficiently large screen, PC usage on the TV is a very effective experience and my media center PC is the most used computer in the house. Once Apple invents the idea, I'm sure you'll understand.

      Now, if you're the type that wants the PC in one room and the TV in another then the iTV may work well. Windows had that solution first, though, and you could buy that now if you liked. Apple has most definitely not come up with anything new in the iTV.

    2. Re:Shouldn't compare Microsoft MCE to Front-Row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy your delusions.

    3. Re:Shouldn't compare Microsoft MCE to Front-Row by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      When I bought my laptop I figure, hey, why not, MCE is only 10 more bucks. I hate it with ever part of my being. Thankfully, I was at least able to disable it from noticing when I put DVDs into my computer and suck away all the file associations, but it still trys to rear its ugly code every once in a while. I don't see why it doesn't work if it's just an extention of WMP. DVD with WMP or PowerDVD runs fine on my the screen or on a remote screen, but with MCE it skips, audio doesn't decode properly, it sucks.

      But what gets me the most is that after you look at a picture, listen to a song, attempt to make a playlist, or watch a movie, it's very eager to delete your files. Never again will I make that mistake.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    4. Re:Shouldn't compare Microsoft MCE to Front-Row by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er,

      1) I'm an unabashed UNIX bigot and have been making a living for the last 20 years as UNIX SA,
      DBA for databases hosted on UNIX, writing apps targetted for UNIX machines, and most recently
      managing teams of UNIX people like myself.

      2) I think Mickey soft internet exploder is one of the most dangerous apps on Windows machines, and the OS
      is laughably insecure. In short, I'm no MS apologist. My machine is locked down on a seperate
      LAN behind an OpenBSD firewall.

      3) I own MCE because I bought MCE explicitly, not because it was the cheapest Windows version
      except for Home.

      4) I use MCE for all my playback -- mostly downloaded TV shows, and some timeshifted HDTV OTA programs.

      Why? Because a) it passes the wife acceptance factor test. When I can dedicate some time to
      making an equilavent Myth-TV box, I probably will.. but with my time worth $120/hr + it doesn't
      make much sense to putter other than for the sheer joy of it, and MCE works out of the box
      (modulo the endless driver updates you get when booting any mickeysoft machine.)

      Just a counterpoint to your assertions.

  160. Where's the artwork coming from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have they built their own artwork database, or is it via a third party? It's really hit or miss so far, so I'm wondering if that's just the way it's going to be, or if they're still building...

  161. It's more like... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    Apple is in your wallet

  162. MythTV + iTV by Iron+Chef+Unix · · Score: 1

    OK, I was considering options as I want a DVR and a new HD TV. What if MythTV code was updated to record shows and then sync them to iTunes? That way you could have your workhorse computer in your office, running MythTV, but then you could watch those programs through your iTV box? I think this would be a great solution for me, because I wouldn't need a dedicated computer for recording/watching content, plus I could simultaneously play downloaded movies and TV shows from the same box. This, of course, assumes that running other apps wouldn't affect the TV recording. Anyone more knowledgeable want to comment?

    --
    Like puzzle games? Warehouse51 for iOS
  163. sad by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    And apple used to innovate. Guess I'll save my money for a "real" video player:

    http://reviews.cnet.com/Archos_AV500_Mobile_DVR_30 GB/4505-6499_7-31517717.html?tag=viddet

    And this thing has been out for ages. Must be hella hard for Apple to knock one off when you're falling back to 2002 for your ipod designs (mini-nano? Yech.)

  164. Screw you Apple by bogie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'll stick with Itunes 4.9. Oh wait....I can't. The assholes at Apple decided I should be forced to upgrade my software even though it works perfectly well. I have no use for downloading movies from Itunes and I guess I now have no use for the Itunes online store either.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  165. Re:Baby Steps - HDTV by Shashvat · · Score: 1

    During the iTV demo, The Incredibles was previed in HDTV.

    So it can already do HD, presumably through its HDMI/Component outputs.

    --
    cat /dev/null >.sig
  166. In other news, fanboys think ads are news by MogNuts · · Score: 1

    wow, apple fanboys amaze me. normally we could care less and would like to avoid commercials. here, this ad is considered news and people are excited to watch steve's presentation when it too is just a big ad. is it brilliant marketing or moron consumers?

    1. Re:In other news, fanboys think ads are news by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      let me put it a different way. this is not news! this is not the second coming (unlike apple fanboys like to think). it's all advertisements!

  167. I don't quite like how it does album art, any fix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, a lot of my stuff has the standard "artist" tag. With albums that have one artist the album art shows up as one thing next to all the tracks.

    Except when there is more then one artist on an album, the thing has a lot of redunded art and seperates them like they are other albums.

    So is there some setting I am missing(only extra "new" one I checked was "group compolations when browsing"), or do I have to use the "artist album" tag people are reporting here?

  168. Itunes 7 seems to be inherently unstable by swganle · · Score: 1

    I just installed iTunes 7 and found that for some strange reason my computer was all of a sudden unable to handle the visualization within iTunes with out causing the audio to skip, while with itunes 6 my computer was able to hand almost full screen visualization at 1280X800 at between 35 and 45 fps, depending on what else was running in the background. It seems that a fairly large number of people are having similar problems based on the number of posts on apple.com under support, but they only seem to be having problems with the audio skipping and not with the visualization.
    It seems to me that however apple modified the visualization part of iTunes, weather or not this has anything to due with the new use or do not use DirectX option, iTunes is no longer able to establish a balance between good performance and allowing the over all windows environment to remain stable, it simply draws too much of the system resources. It is so bad that even with NO visualization and iTunes simply playing music, the simple task of opening another explorer or firefox window is enough to cause the audio to skip.
    I am curios to know if other people are having any problems with the visualization portion of the program as well.

  169. How Apple's iTV Media Strategy Works by DECS · · Score: 2, Informative
    RoughlyDrafted presents a closer look at Apple's announced iTV set top box, why it isn't ready yet, how it differs from existing products already on the market, and how it fits in with the company's online media strategy:

    How Apple's iTV Media Strategy Works

    A Visual Comparison of CD, DVD, HD and iTMS

    Why Apple is Winning in Media Downloads

    The Apple iTMS vs Amazon Unbox Rivalry Myth

  170. CinemaNow.com is your friend by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

    If DVD burning is your bag, then try CinemaNow.com (I think their DVD burning is still in "beta"). And they allow downloading actual DVDs, not just movie vids, so you get the menus, deleted scenes, etc.

    --
    -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
  171. Introducing iPod Pequeno by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

    Amy Poehler: We are very honored here at Weekend Update to have a very special guest. Here to talk about the hottest gifts this holiday season, CEO of Apple Computers, Steve Jobs.

    Steve Jobs: Thank you Amy and Tina. Are you looking for the perfect holiday gift? Well it's here, the new iPod.

    Tina Fey: Oh! The iPod Nano? I got that one, I love it!

    Steve Jobs: Nope!

    Amy Poehler: Oh oh! No! Tina, I bet it's that new video iPod. Those look really cool; I want to get one of those!

    Steve Jobs: No! Those are both obsolete. This one came out just a few minutes ago.

    Amy Poehler: A few minutes ago?

    Steve Jobs: Yes, ladies and gentlemen, introducing, and I'm thrilled about this, the iPod Micro!

    (He pulls out an iPod that is no more than an inch tall)

    Tina and Amy: Wow!

    Steve Jobs: The iPod Micro holds over 50 thousand songs! It has iPhoto, you can watch movies on it, in high definition.

    Tina Fey: But we can barely see it.

    Steve Jobs: Exactly! That's exciting!

    Amy Poehler: Well I guess, but how are we supposed to watch movies on it?

    Steve Jobs: Well, you don't have to worry about that because by Thanksgiving, the iPod Micro will be obsolete!

    (He throws it onto the Update desk. Tina and Amy gasp)

    Ladies and gentlemen, I am thrilled about this, introducing the new iPod Pequeño.

    (He pulls out one that is at least half the size of the iPod Micro)

    Tina Fey: When did that come out?

    Steve Jobs: Just now! The iPod Pequeño, the smallest iPod yet! It holds a million songs! A million songs! A MILLION SONGS! It has an iCalendar that goes seven thousand years into the future, iPhoto, you can watch movies on this!

    Amy Poehler: Geez, you know that thing's really small.

    Tina Fey: And you can watch movies on that?

    Steve Jobs: Not any more, because by Christmas, the iPod Pequeño will be obsolete.

    (He throws it down on the desk as well)

    Amy Poehler: Wait, that iPod was only out for like five seconds.

    Steve Jobs: Five seconds too long! It was too big! Ridicules, old, obsolete! But guess what, I'm very proud to introduce, and I'm thrilled about this, the new iPod Invisa.

    (He 'pulls' something out but he is really not holding anything)

    Amy Poehler: Okay, wait a minute Steve Jobs, I don't even think you're really holding anything.

    Steve Jobs: I am! The iPod Invisa, the perfect stocking stuffer. It holds 8 million songs, every photograph ever taken, Pong. And watch...

    (He purposely throws 'it' on the desk.)

    Steve Jobs: Oops I dropped it, but where did it go, on the ground? No, it's floating!

    Tina Fey: Steve Jobs everyone.

    Amy Poehler: He wasn't holding anything you guys. Thank you Steve.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  172. Re:No movie burning? Meh by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that way initially. Lots of people started using iTunes just to play their music collections, and burning to CD was an important feature. Remember "Rip, Mix, Burn" ? The iPod's came to dominate the portable mp3 market because of iTunes. They supplanted recordable cds. If Apple doesn't allow people to burn movies, the movie store is either dead in the water or will face very slow adoption. Nobody is going to shell out $300 for some box just to download movies and watch them on their TV when they can buy DVDs for the same price. If you want to hook people you have to get them on your platform, then show them what is possible with new hardware. I.e: get them ripping and burning cds in iTunes, then show them the iPod. Get them downloading movies and watching them, then show them the movie player.

    The reality is, burning movies has not yet reached the pervasiveness that burning music did when iTunes became popular, and I would bet that the movie studios are putting up a stink. Give them a year. The common man has almost figured out bittorrent :)

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  173. Re:Set-top box? I so called this on /.! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except that it has no hard drive and it's not a DVD media player, and doesn't cost $199. But you got the part about plugging it in to your TV right, so that's something to hang your hat on, anyway.

  174. Wow, by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    So somebody actually does use that visualization crap. :-)

    1. Re:Wow, by swganle · · Score: 1

      Crap it maybe, but it is far better than the crap that comes with windows.

  175. Once again... by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    Just like the TV series, the movies are available only in the US. Way to go Apple.

  176. You can change video types now! by TheSkyIsPurple · · Score: 1

    iTunes 7 allows you to change the video type for your self encoded videos to TV Show now! yay

  177. Re:View/organize by album cover: ripped off Micros by ericdano · · Score: 1

    Isn't everything Microsoft has out there a RC or a Beta?

    Media Player, Vista, this, that and the other thing?

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  178. Confirmed by ben_rh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having tested it this afternoon, I can report that iTunes 7 does indeed do true gapless playback.

    Now, there seem to be two types built in:

    - The first is standard gapless - the end of one file and the beginning of another coincide with no introduced gap. This is presumably a change in the playback / buffering code.
    - The second is scanned gapless - in addition to the introduced gap being eliminated, you can mark a 'gapless album' - which I assume actually removes (or rather, removes for playback) silence from the start and end of tracks. This would explain the 'scanning for gapless playback' background scan upon the initial launch of iTunes 7.

    What I have been wanting for so long is the standard gapless kind - I don't want silence trimmed from the tracks, I just want them to from one to the next with no gaps introduced. So for those who have been after the same thing, I can confirm that this now works with no extra flag-setting or configuration.

    For the record, I tested it out on Pink Floyd's The Wall. Sounded great. :)

  179. Re:HFS! Gapless! by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

    No, gapless support was just added to iTunes. Previously, you could approximate the effect wit crossfading turned on and set to 0 seconds, but that still produced a fade-in/fade-out effect.

    --
    ± 29 dB
  180. Processing album artwork needs repeated iterations by degenerativephrenolo · · Score: 1

    With 1100 albums and over 11,000 "songs" in my iTunes collection, I am finding that iTunes is not downloading all the album artwork at once on a single try. I have used the command "get album artwork" a number of times, and missing album covers are being filled in only gradually. I wonder if that is because Apple's servers are bogged down. There is no error message "artwork not found", yet some covers that were not found the first time around have appeared on later attempts. So how will I know when the collection is as complete as it can be?

    (Yes, I really do own every CD whose content is in my collection. But many of these "songs" are simply my own interviews and other research recordings, and no original disk exists.)

  181. No DVD burning??? Meh... by eliot1785 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't burn this to a DVD to play in a DVD player? Sorry, then it's pretty much pointless to me. Also, the movies aren't even full DVD resolution. Why exactly does Apple think it can get away with charging up to $15 for this crap? I will still buy real DVD's as long as that's the policy, thank you very much.

    Also, one of the supposed improvements to the new iPods is that the screen is now 60% brighter. Is it just me or was the iPod screen already extremely bright, almost too bright? 60% brighter and I'm not sure I'll even be able to look at it. Fortunately they have the brightness control.

    I agree with engadget - I'm pretty underwhelmed by this. I was hoping they'd have a bigger screen. Is the increase from 60gb to 80gb really going to sell anybody on this? Something makes me think not.

    The decrease in price is pretty cool, but isn't that a tacit admission on their part that the improvements on their own aren't worth buying the 5.5G? If the improvements were good they wouldn't have to lower the price.

    The Nano's, however, are nice. As is the shuffle. The shuffle is pretty badass given how small it is, like a lapel pin. And I like the return to multicolor that they lost when they discontinued the Mini.

    Still, there is no reason at all for me to upgrade my iPod from my 60gb 5G, even if I did have the money. And I think this may leave them vulnerable to Microsoft, whose player will have a bigger screen.

    Overall, my reaction is "meh"...

  182. iTV Wireless by daivdg · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what wireless standard iTV is due to run on? They appear to call it "802.11" which sounds to me like they might be hedging their bets. Would the sort of video they demonstrated require 802.11n? Is this why they're waiting? I couldn't make out in the video of the event whether the iTV box he showed was wired into the LAN. I would have thought if it was working over a wireless network he would have made more of it. Also - why did they stream the event live to London, and then say that films can only be bought in the US? :-S

  183. Playing catch up to open source by homebrandcola · · Score: 1

    So Apple has finaly caught upto the free open source http://www.rockbox.org/ firmware with gapless play back. Excpet it needs to re-jig the files to make them gapless. Rockbox doesn't.

    They added a search function much like the one that has existed in Creative (and others) players for a while.

    The battery life on video play back has caught up with other players, although it does still lag behind quite a few.

    If I remember correctly, the last keynote Job's took advertised the iPod as having 80~% market share. Now 75~%.

  184. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That made my day :-) Wish I could give you Karma for humor.

  185. the huge missing feature by vistic · · Score: 1

    A DVR/TiVo-type device is the H-U-G-E missing feature from iTV.

    I can't believe it's not part of it. Maybe they'll add it later? But it would be such a huge value if this thing was also a DVR.

  186. iTow by AxminsterLeuven · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the new Apple iTow in the background of this picture: http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/med ia/2006/09/dsc_0827.jpg Isn't that Ballmer's car?

  187. Sound output corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not a Mac user, but I have been using iTunes for quite some time now... and I had never faced this kind of a problem with iTunes before.

    I don't know, if the issue is same in OS X environment, but on Windows this upgrade to iTunes 7.0.0.70 rendered whole program unusable because the sound output gets corrupted if there is any application producing sound at the same time (e.g. some videoclip playing at the background or even Winamp playing music for that matter)...

    Every time, when some other application starts to produce sound, iTunes playback will sound like a broken vinyl record (skipping etc.) for a start and then the sound becomes totally corrupted in a short amount of time. When iTunes is closed again, it becames evident, that other applications have no problem with sound playback whatsoever.

    Had 6.0.5 in use before that and never experienced such a problem even when using TV tuner, video player and iTunes simultaneously.

    P.S. If the library was not backed up before iTunes 7 installation, then reverting to ver. 6 will be painful, because once library gets altered by newer version, it will not be backward-compatible.

    P.P.S. System Restore won't helped in reverting to old version, still considering whether to restore the system partition from 10 days old backup or not to resolve this sh.t

    1. Re:Sound output corruption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to previous I can state, that I am not alone struggling with this problem - so this is not a system or hardware issue on my computer.

  188. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

    If you lived in the UK, you'd know that you'd rarely want to record anything on ITV anyway.

  189. no more education discount for iPods? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Checking the online store, there doesn't seem to be a student discount for iPods anymore. Bummer.

  190. iTunes 7 memory hog? by TheLetterZ · · Score: 1

    I read about the new iTunes version yesterday, and the first thing I did when I got to work today was download it. However is it just me or is iTunes 7 a worse memory hog than the previous versions? While iTunes 6 maxed out on around 40MB memory usage on an average day (mostly listening to streaming radio channels), just know after 3 hours, iTunes 7 used 169MB - and that was when being idle. Or hey, maybe it's just getting Vista read? ;-)

  191. YES, nice iPod fixes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES, nice iPod fixes!

    Ipod features I love so far(still haven't messed with it much):
    1) GAPLESS WORKS!!!!! Now I don't have to go through the annoying process involving acc files!
    2) Scrolling through long lists, fast-scrolling allows you to skip through based on starting LETTER!
    3) Games, well not yet, maybe sometime later I will get Tetris, and maybe some more good ones will show up.

    iTunes features I love:
    1) Cleaned up some of the bloated-ness, slowness, and eyesore GUI.
    2) Nice indicator showing how much of my iPod's space is used up.
    3) The way album art and tracks are separated is nice.
    4) Doesn't seem to take as long as it use-to to realize my network drive is off....

    Still needs work:
    1) It still takes FOREVER for iTunes to update my iPod, even if I haven't touched anything on it, haven't messed with my music/movies/etc, or did anything to warrnet it in iTunes! Even more annoying is it not giving any indication as to HOW LONG IT WILL TAKE. I wouldn't even mind if they give me "Microsoft minutes" type estimates, and maybe some clue as to just what it is updating/checking.

    2) Still eats CPU and kills other apps(Yes, I have windows XP, and no I am not running a bunch of crud, nor am I interested in leaving "Micro$loth WinBloz" for OSX). Also still isn't too responsive when I click it on the task bar to bring it up.

  192. VERY disappointing! by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

    The iTV thing will cost $299! That's just too expensive!
    All I need is a device that can access files through WiFi and show them on the TV. I don't need it to have a snazzy interface.

    And besides, what about the iPhone?

    I'm sorry, but Apple is not delivering.

    --
    hemi
  193. Re:View/organize by album cover: ripped off Micros by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    Sadly, so is Google.

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  194. iTunes Is Now Smarter About Multiple Computers? by ArizonaJer · · Score: 1
    From TFA, Steve Jobs says:
    "It's also easier to move your iTunes from one computer to another. Let's say you have one computer at home and at work, both authorized with the same account. You can transfer purchased content between authorized computers - it'll upload from your iPod to your work iTunes." (my emphasis)
    Is this not a major shift for iTunes?

    One thing that's kept me from using iTunes much and feelin' the love for my iPod is their previously clunky way of syncing with multiple computers. I haven't tried it in months, but last time I did the iPod did not play well with more than one computer. I wanted it to sync as smoothly and intelligently as my Palm PDA syncs my calendar app. But it didn't.

    If the new iTunes has finally gotten smart about syncing multiple computers I might finally become a podhead.

    --
    Jeremy Butler
    www.ScreenSite.org
    www.TVCrit.com
  195. iTunes lets you burn it! by Imazalil · · Score: 1

    I think.

    Just installed it and remember seeing somewhere - in the software update description i think - a bullet that mentioned that you can now 'easily' backup your itunes library (this I would take to be the entire library: music, video, podcasts et al) haven't tried it or looked for the function, but Apple generally isn't stupid enough to not let you back up your downloaded files in some way.

    Can someone else confirm?

  196. How do New Zealanders get album art? by phobonetik · · Score: 1

    Seems you need to sign up to the store. NZ isn't one of the country options. I go so far as to pretend being in Australia and enter in my credit card number (without any intention of actually buying something), and it says my credit card number isn't from Australia (true)... so I guess this album art feature aint for me until I move to Australia or iTunes opens in New Zealand (unlikely this decade...?)

  197. Just shipped by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    My 80 gig iPod order from yesterday has finally shipped. The orders appear to be shipping directly from Shanghai, China.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  198. So much for sway indeed. by Wooky_linuxer · · Score: 1

    You are looking at it the wrong way. Acessory makers will sell their present inventory to present iPod owners - they are not thworing that in the garbage just now. And if by chance you upgrade your iPod, you will also have to buy NEW acessories due to the change of form factors.

    --
    Where is that guy who'd die defending what I had to say when I need him?
  199. The Old Mill! by argent · · Score: 1

    The Old Mill, the classic pre-Fantasia musical short from Disney, is available for $1.99. If you haven't seen it, it's worth the price of admission. If you have, you're probably heading over there to get it already and didn't bother reading this far. :)

  200. Latest Apple update causes dramas by impurist · · Score: 1

    OK I screwed up!!! After updating my iMac (which has run for the most part perefectly since January). My Colleague (a long time mac head) and I enjoyed watching SJ's presentation on iTunes 7 and the new iPods, iTV etc... After this event (and we have to admit whenever SJ gets up and talks its an event) I updated both my Intel iMac (my work machine not mine sadly) and my MacBook Pro (mine all mine mu ha ha ha ha cost me enough though). Ok back to my screwed up. I had a truckload of apps open (doin some rails dev & rubycocoa among other things) ran software update and in the process of restarting Preview.app just hung on for grim death and would not let the iMac restart. So like my usually impatient self I waited a little. Which tunred out to be not enough. So I killed the power and re-booted up expecting it all to "magically work". No such luck! I essentialy killed my profile. I now cant log in as myself, tried all the tricks I now (and Apple support knows) to no avail! However all seemed good on my MacBook Pro, which I am using to write this post! I later noticed that some apps will no longer run on my macbook, like MS Office and Photoshop! They just bounce once in the dock and the stop. A quick look at the console reveals a crash report from the particular app. Excel photoshop word powerpoint. Hang on am I seeing a pattern. These are all PPC apps maybe there are some rosetta issues. Anyone else had any dramas? MacBook is running fine aside from PPC apps it seems. Can anyone help clarify this or am I totally deluded! Peace! Impurist

  201. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by ek_adam · · Score: 1

    I'll be very surprised if iTV isn't released at or before the MacWorld Expo in January.

  202. iTunes 7 is unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    After playing with iTunes 7 for a day, I found this new version unstable. The download view does not work properly and often make the software hang. I could not burn a cd which was working fine on previous version. The new views are slow even on a 2 gigz cpu. Some songs does not play on airtunes as they are supposed to. Bottomline, the feature set is great but it does not seem that this version is ready for prime time.

  203. That search function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have reported the iPod 5G 1.2 updater adding that search to older iPod with Video. I can't find it. Am I an idiot, or are they?

  204. iT7: album artwork dl? sign in??? by minuszero · · Score: 1

    Somebody give me a good reason
    - that doesn't involve apple potentially looking into what i have in my library (i know they say they don't, but i can't figure any other reason) -
    as to why automatic album artwork download should require one to log in to the iTMS?

    1. Re:iT7: album artwork dl? sign in??? by degenerativephrenolo · · Score: 1

      May because they are providing you with copyrighted material that does not belong to them, and which legally goes with recordings that you, as a logged-in customer, are presumed to have paid for already.

  205. modded xbox all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'd take my modded xbox over any of this stuff. I stream all my movies and music from my pc, complete with album and imdb info from the internet, not to mention movie trailers and net radio. Did I mention a 1080i desktop interface, completely skinnable? Thats $200 well spent.

  206. does iTunes 7 work with ourtunes? by karakafa · · Score: 1

    seem like apple changed the encryption algorithm of iTunes again with this new version. i haven't installed it yet, but i have difficulty connecting to users with new version. this means that ourtunes will not work with it (until the new algorithm is hacked), and we won't be able to download songs from other userslibraries. does anybody have any ideas? did anybody try to use ourtunes with the new version installed? umph.. thanks steve, i don't need the sucky films WB distributes, and CoverFlow is already texist as a seperate app, i'll hang on to 6.0.5

  207. Lower quality artwork by Taagehornet · · Score: 1
    The new iTunes will download cover art for all the songs in your library, no matter where you got them from, as long as you have an iTunes account.

    Not wanting to spoil the fun, but think twice before you replace artwork grabbed from Amazon, buy.com, or similar places. The artwork iTunes 7 fetches in this way isn't the full resolution artwork that you'll get if you buy from the store, but instead artwork of considerably lower quality, definitely no better than what you could already pull down from Amazon.

    The true high resolution artwork embedded in tracks bought in the music store can be extracted using AtomicParsley (among others). If someone feels like hosting a site for original artwork I'll gladly upload the few hundred covers I've got.

  208. 320x240. by Cybert4 · · Score: 1

    Please turn in your nerd card now.

  209. Re:They'll have trouble with the name iTV in the U by nursegirl · · Score: 1

    My guess is they're hoping that the 802.11n specs get cemented down quickly. I wonder what they'll do if they aren't. 802.11g just isn't enough for wireless streaming of movies of that quality.

  210. It's Geek Card by serialdogma · · Score: 1

    Please turn in your geek card at the door.

  211. Translation.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You would like more substance over form....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  212. You can't have it both ways. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    "No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame." is completely true. From a technical point of view the iPods are not very impressive.

    Which is further confirmed by your own comment: "most of the postings here are "OMG! A blue iPod!".

    Apple is pushing the iPod not as a technical marvel but as a fashion accsesory.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  213. Oh, we see, Apple is reinventing cable TV by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is so f-innovative that I am greatful to be alive in an era of such pioneering innovation.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  214. Apple Remote by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    I just yesterday realized why I like the Apple Remote so much. It's because I can use it without looking. I know where all the buttons are and I know what they do. I don't have to look or think.

    You're right: Common Man.

    Ed Palma

  215. You must be joking. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    They will just flog the old stuff unitl it is all gone and will have a new wave of fanatics buying yet more of the same Apple stuff, as they are told, obediently as always.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  216. Re:Apple == Big Brother by glindsey · · Score: 1

    It saddens me how many people reading that comment today probably had it fly right over their heads.

  217. Beware if you use iTunes Sharing features by flightrules · · Score: 1

    If you share your libraries across your network, you could be in for a nasty surprise.
    If you're only sharing with an older version of iTunes on another computer presumably all you need to do is update that iTunes to V.7 and you should be OK.

    But if you're like me and using an appliance like Roku's Soundbridge then you should hold off for a bit.

    From http://www.rokulabs.com/support/:

    Attention iTunes Users!
    With the release of iTunes 7.0 today (9/12/2006), Apple has changed some of the underlying technology that allows the SoundBridge to communicate directly with iTunes. We hope to have an iTunes 7.0- compatible release of the SoundBridge software soon; however, at this time all SoundBridges are incompatible with the music sharing feature of iTunes 7.0. We recommend that SoundBridge owners wait for a SoundBridge update before upgrade to iTunes 7.0. Users wishing to upgrade to iTunes 7.0 (or who have already upgraded) can install the free Firefly media server to share their libraries with the SoundBridge. Firefly is available here.