Slashdot Mirror


Cuil Proves the Bubble Is Back

MattSparkes writes "Cuil may only have launched this week, but it seems that they're already enjoying late-'90s boom-style comforts. 'Lunch is ordered in every single day. Huge fridges burst with snacks and drinks. Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area. The company pays for a personal trainer and gym membership for everyone. A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbeque, to see if everyone's in good health. Employees drift in an out at times that suit themselves.' Seems like an awesome place to work, but how long will their $25 million VC funding last at this rate?"

496 comments

  1. Cuil Proves Nothing by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cuil Proves the Bubble Is Back

    First of all, a single anecdote does not prove anything. If you included eBay's Skype deal or Google's YouTube deal ... wait, scratch that last one. See, there's constantly non-prudent business deals and every now and then you see a real whopper.

    Lunch is ordered in every single day. Huge fridges burst with snacks and drinks. Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area. The company pays for a personal trainer and gym membership for everyone. A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbecue, to see if everyone's in good health. Employees drift in an out at times that suit themselves.

    Do you think that this is what caused the dot com bubble? Do you think the vast majority of people were living like this when it burst? I'm no economist but I thought that the problem wasn't with how the IT and Web Site companies were spending their money but rather what the customers they found were giving them money for--basically nothing. A few HTML pages? Not even worth my time to read?

    $25 million in venture capital is nothing these days. Let them burn it. Yeah, we'll all be laughing a couple months from now when they're busting their asses to find some income--or maybe they are correct in thinking they are the next Google. Hell, Slashdot ran a story reporting them to index more than Google. With the kind of press they achieved, maybe they're right to live like royalty for a bit?

    Does anyone look back on Google and say "They hired a massage artist? Proof the bubble is back!" No, because they thought they were going to be big and they were.

    You want to prevent another bubble? Don't take a job where you're not sure how you or any of your coworkers draw revenue from real customers who in turn receive some service or product that makes complete sense. That's how you prevent a bubble. And unless you're part of the 1% calling the shots on how to spend money, you needn't worry about how other companies spend their money. This frivolous spending should just make it easier for Google to beat their bottom line and steal customers back. And if they can't, well then let Cuil rake large piles of capital together and set them afire to their heart's content.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Cuil Proves the Bubble Is Back

      First of all, a single anecdote does not prove anything. If you included eBay's Skype deal or Google's YouTube deal ... wait, scratch that last one. See, there's constantly non-prudent business deals and every now and then you see a real whopper.

      Lunch is ordered in every single day. Huge fridges burst with snacks and drinks. Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area. The company pays for a personal trainer and gym membership for everyone. A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbecue, to see if everyone's in good health. Employees drift in an out at times that suit themselves.

      Do you think that this is what caused the dot com bubble? Do you think the vast majority of people were living like this when it burst? I'm no economist but I thought that the problem wasn't with how the IT and Web Site companies were spending their money but rather what the customers they found were giving them money for--basically nothing. A few HTML pages? Not even worth my time to read? $25 million in venture capital is nothing these days. Let them burn it. Yeah, we'll all be laughing a couple months from now when they're busting their asses to find some income--or maybe they are correct in thinking they are the next Google. Hell, Slashdot ran a story reporting them to index more than Google. With the kind of press they achieved, maybe they're right to live like royalty for a bit? Does anyone look back on Google and say "They hired a massage artist? Proof the bubble is back!" No, because they thought they were going to be big and they were. You want to prevent another bubble? Don't take a job where you're not sure how you or any of your coworkers draw revenue from real customers who in turn receive some service or product that makes complete sense. That's how you prevent a bubble. And unless you're part of the 1% calling the shots on how to spend money, you needn't worry about how other companies spend their money. This frivolous spending should just make it easier for Google to beat their bottom line and steal customers back. And if they can't, well then let Cuil rake large piles of capital together and set them afire to their heart's content.

      you are a real pro.

    2. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by tha_mink · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think that the bigger proof is that their product sucks ass. Go try and use it. I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results. 0 results? Really? You index *more* than google and you can't find ONE reference to "aes zip linux"? I tried to use that thing, but it doesn't seem to enjoy providing me with any results. To me *that* is proof that they are a bubble company. Where's the beef?

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    3. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by cronot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What 'tha_mink' said. Plus, their page design is too bloated, it takes too long to load the results page, compared to Google, with its simplistic design, that loads almost instantly. I've scrapped Cuil just for that.

    4. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by swrona · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dont know what your problem is; CUIL returns 78,662,145 results for "beef". They don't seem to have trouble finding it. :)

      --
      -=Steve
    5. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Zarf · · Score: 1

      You sir, walk softly and carry a big clue-bat.

      --
      [signature]
    6. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think that the bigger proof is that their product sucks ass. Go try and use it. I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results. 0 results? Really? You index *more* than google and you can't find ONE reference to "aes zip linux"? I tried to use that thing, but it doesn't seem to enjoy providing me with any results. To me *that* is proof that they are a bubble company. Where's the beef?

      Erm... and google's results are so much better? More timely, perhaps, but ... c'mon ;)

    7. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by JonnyDomestik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well I am an economist actually and while I don't think that anybody is saying that this sort of spending caused the bubble, they are symptomatic of the sort of investing that happens in a bubble. Of course, with the economy going the way it is, all this is pretty much moot since there is clearly not a lot of speculative investment going on.

    8. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by hobbit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    9. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by mikey_boy · · Score: 5, Informative

      yeah, the difference being that if you search without the quotes, google returns a shedload of results. Cuil still returns nothing:

      cuil search

      google search

    10. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For google -- you get a lot more results if you delete the leading quote

    11. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 4, Informative

      I put up a page to help compare the results:

      http://www.cornetdesign.com/googlevscuil.html

      Did the same thing for Live:

      http://www.cornetdesign.com/livevscuil.html

    12. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Informative

      Erm... and google's results are so much better?

      Yes, they are -- if your search does not begin with a quotation mark, which means "look for this exact phrase".

    13. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I get "no results" for even common web searches, and bizarre mistakes even on the occasions when it DOES work (showing inappropriate pictures beside entries, shwoing results that have nothing to do with the search term, etc.). Their claims of being better than Google are not only laughable, but probably cross over into outright fraud. Anyone stupid enough to invest in such a company DESERVES their fucking. The whole thing reeks of con job.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While he did put quotes around the terms in his comment, I really doubt he meant them to translate into the query. Considering that, google returns 570,000 results to cuil's whopping 0.

    15. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      $25 million in venture capital is nothing these days. Let them burn it. Yeah, we'll all be laughing a couple months from now when they're busting their asses to find some income--or maybe they are correct in thinking they are the next Google. Hell, Slashdot ran a story [slashdot.org] reporting them to index more than Google. With the kind of press they achieved, maybe they're right to live like royalty for a bit?

      Go do a few searches and tell me if you think the volume of what is indexed is what matters..

      The bits about free lunch and strawberries and stuff are funny, those kinds of thinks maybe represent the worst excesses of the Bubble but the Bubble was really about people taking VC cash, making out landish claims and completely failing to deliver. It's just symbolism.

      After cranking out a couple of my test searches and seeing some absolutely mediocre results, my faith in their new super google killer is fading. So basically, we know that they took some VC, we know that they made a big PR run, we kind of know that the product isn't baked yet. Whether or not it ever will be? That's the question, then you hear about the perks at their office, hopefully those perks are there because their totally elite team of hackers (uh, well I hadn't heard the names of any really really good guys being hired there) is working 20 hours a day trying to put the polishing on.

      Cuil proves nothing but they are in the act of proving that there are still suckers willing to buy dreams, even if they're being sold by folks with a resume full of failed attempts to make those dreams happen. Biggest indicator of all? If any of their staff had been successful at their last search efforts, they'd have funds and they'd know that they could self-fund and make astronomically more money than they ever will by taking VC to prototype their idea.

    16. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, google at least turned one result when searching for "aes zip linux".

        Results 1 - 1 of 1 for "aes zip linux". (0.08 seconds)
      Slashdot | Cuil Proves the Bubble Is Back
      I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results. 0 results? Really? You index *more* than google and you can't find ONE reference to "aes zip linux"? ...
      it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/31/1242243&from=rss - 27 minutes ago - Similar pages

      This proves that google is superior. At least it gets results.

    17. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by entrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think it's hilarious that your query returns a googlewhack: a link to the very comment you replied to. Pretty impressive.

      --
      -- The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'.
    18. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by jacks_papa · · Score: 1

      my search for "reston master plan"(without any quotes) yielded 0 results at cuil, while Google found 99,200 results for the identical search. what gives? maybe cuil's huge list of indexed sites are all the ones Google thinks are useless. it doesn't seem to be a superset.

    19. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Herr+Brush · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. GP's post was modded informative even though it gives 0 indication of how google is superior.

    20. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last week I tried cuil'ing my name and nothing relevant showed up at all. Today they have almost every relevant page that links to me...

      They're doing a good job in indexing...

    21. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the very least it would be nice to have an alternative to Google. I remember back in the early days of the World Wide Web when there were multiple search engines available. Diversity was good then and would be good now.

    22. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the eyestrain-inducing matrix layout of the results. Thanks, Cuil, I was really hoping to have to expend MORE effort to glance through the first ten search results!

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    23. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that I found Cuil less then useful as well.
      Type in CB750 Forum "A motorcycle I am rebuilding".
      The best forum I know for it is SOHC4.net.
      Not even on the page.

      Try LongEZ one of the most popular Homebuilt aircraft ever.
      Cuil comes up with junk.

      It is pretty to look at but not very useful as far as I can tell.
      Google is still better.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by vidarh · · Score: 1

      You have tons. They're just not very good. But then that's not very different form the early days.

    25. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice comparison, it really shows how bad cuil's results are. I searched for something local: Bethesda Playgrounds, and the top 3 google results were very relevant, no results on cuil's top page were relevant. Either their index isn't nearly as big as they claim or their algorithm really sucks.

    26. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Warhawke · · Score: 0

      Does anyone look back on Google and say "They hired a massage artist? Proof the bubble is back!" No, because they thought they were going to be big and they were.

      Page and Brin aren't known for extravagant and luxurious corporate spending. IIRC, they celebrated their first $1 million earned by dining out at Burger King. The Googleplex does have exercise and kitchen amenities, but what major offices don't these days? A better example would be the SAS Institute, which provides its employees with massive scale luxurious amenities and still sees profit, since such amenities like on-site healthcare and daycare actually increase productivity and reduce cost.

    27. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think that the bigger proof is that their product sucks ass

      I tried it last week when the other article about cuil was posted here. My thoughts on it were:

      1. I did a search for "mcgrew cigarettes". Google's third result was a K5 article I wrote several years ago, How to quit smoking cigarettes. Cuil's idiotic column layout makes it hard to determine if it's the second or the fourth result, but rather than return the K5 article, it returns a completely unrelated site (tobacco.org) that copied the intro (no permission, but fair use) and a link to the K5 article. Lame.
      2. The site is IMO ugly as sin. It looks like a 1998 Quake site.
      3. iFrames. Ugh.
      4. Columns? Why?
      5. Cuil returns 47 results on three pages, many of which on the first page lack the word "mcgrew" or "cigarettes". Google returns 12,900 results, all of the results on the first page have both "mcgrew" and "cigarettes" in the text.

      In fact, this thing is completely lame in every respect I can think of. It's so lame crutches won't work, not even a wheelchair will make this thing mobile.

      It's doomed to failure. Google has kicked ass on every other search engine out there, and Cuil even gets its ass kicked by Microsoft's search. Now, THAT'S pathetic. Anybody foolish enough to invest in Cuil deserves to lose his money.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    28. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Milkshak · · Score: 1

      Best post of this thread. I feel sorry for the sad saps who didn't get it.

    29. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by garcia · · Score: 1

      The beef is in spam. If I search for myself, which on Google returns the root page of my website first and then some random page (I'm not sure why it's that particular post since it's so fucking old) under that. The next 10 to 12 links are also me. Seems good enough.

      On Cuil though, the first hits are random spam pages and deep linked pages on my site that I have had around for years. Seriously? They might have more pages available in their index but they're shit and irrelevant. Oh, and the fucking random images next to the links aren't relevant and aren't even from the posts they are next to. Stupid.

      This doesn't show that the bubble is back -- it shows that someone released a shitty ass product and got press for it for some unknown reason.

    30. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by iamacat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well, they have been up for just two days. It took Google much more than $25 million in free dinners, heated toilet seats and employee shuttle service to get to their current state.

      I don't know if their idea has merit. Personally, I don't like the 3 column result grid. But if you are one of the world's top software engineers and are taking a risk to work in a startup, wouldn't you expect to feel that you are appreciated? Those fruit bowls would be like $1/employee/day considering that not everyone will have one every day after the initial excitement period.

    31. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, from personal experience, don't go to work for a company who hires a guy that's done nothing but manage restaurants to be their VP of web development.
       
      Not that, y'know, I ever found myself working for that dude or anything...

    32. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just queried the word "bastard".

      While Google did provide more relevant results, cuil's first response was:

      "b a s t a r d

      The bastard is distributed in source and binary tarball form; the source package is recommended. "

      Hell, I never knew I came tarred up!

    33. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...showing inappropriate pictures...

      The good kind of inappropriate?

    34. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cuil is not even as good as Yahoo's search or Microsoft's search.

      Yahoo:
      http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=aes+zip+linux

      Microsoft:
      http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=aes+zip+linux

      These two are actually competitive in search quality nowadays and they still have trouble getting Google's share.

      So what are the odds Cuil is going to get anywhere?

      When Google first started, I recall they _were_ significantly better than their competitors (Altavista, Infoseek, hotbot etc).

      Seriously what does Cuil do better for users than Google, Yahoo or Microsoft?

      --
    35. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Huggs · · Score: 1

      Seems to me, we may just need to tell cuil what to index. It'll be annoying for a while, but once they get good list of index terms it should perform quite well. Maybe next week they'll have results for aes zip linux.

    36. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your post isn't exactly on topic, but as I can afford a downmodding I'll respond.

      I don't care if some jackass buys a house he can't afford.

      How about when "some jackass" like me CAN afford a house, but his wife and her job leaves him and his teenaged daughters for another man, and he is left raising and supporting those daughters without her income or help, and loses the house that he no longer can afford on his single salary? Or some "jackass" not like me gets his job outsourced? Or gets crippled and can't do that job any more? You might try being a little less judgemental there, sparky. BTW calling someone "jackass" just might get you modded "flamebait". Try to be a bit more civil; I was insulted by your callous, judgemental, ignorant comment.

      I do care when that leads to bank failures government bailouts and a stagnant economy.

      The stagnant economy isn't a result of bank failures or government bailouts, but is caused by the fact that gasoline prices have quadrupled since the oil barons moved into the White House. With fuel so expensive nobody can afford much of anything else. The extra three dollars I have to spend on that gallon of gasoline is lunch at McDonald's I won't be buying. That is what is stagnating the economy - everybody is broke, thanks to the price of oil. That, in fact, probably is a contributing factor to some losing their homes.

      Likewise, I don't care if some douchebag internet company has cool perks.

      You should care; where do you think they're getting their funding? Yep, those banks that are failing and getting bailed out by the government.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    37. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by vikstar · · Score: 1

      So if firefox install, by default, an ad-blocker which also blocks google ads, and ie does the same then is that going to bust its bubble? Or does google have some other source of income?

      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    38. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by timias1 · · Score: 1

      I noticed the same problem, the first click on 50% of my searches returned 0 results. I tried it again and it returned results. I believe this is nothing more than a bug in their first release. I have a hard time believing they aren't actively aware of it and working on it feverishly.

    39. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by anexium · · Score: 1

      not to mention that the way the results are displayed is super ugly, and awkward to use. and it breaks on ie6*. and the results it brings are mostly from spam/link farm type places too. think this one'll get lumped in with all those other search engines i never use (altavista, live, ask, etc) and i'll stick with something that produces result that might be of some use to me.

      * - yes, i know, iknow, but it's a work computer so no firefox..

    40. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by SirShmoopie · · Score: 1

      Searching for nmod, my open source product using your page, I find that Google produced results which were far more relevant than cuil. first up was the world of warcraft mod of the same name, which is fine, but right after it was my site. That's quite good.
      Cuil failed to produce results that were as good. Neither the WOW mods main page or my own were first, and most of the first page of results were of sub pages and forum threads.

    41. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Lunch is ordered in every single day. Huge fridges burst with snacks and drinks. Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area. The company pays for a personal trainer and gym membership for everyone. A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbecue, to see if everyone's in good health. Employees drift in an out at times that suit themselves.

      Do you think that this is what caused the dot com bubble? Do you think the vast majority of people were living like this when it burst?

      What's more, this isn't even all that outrageous even in this day and age. Strawberries and muffins don't cost all that much, and my employer has lunch delivered every day, and a masseuse comes over every wednesday. I've heard of companies that offer gym membership (I'm sure you can get a good deal if you give it to every employee). So all that remains is a weekly barbecue (instead of just a weekly drink, which a lot of companies have), a personal trainer and a doctor.

      They do a bit more than other companies, but not outrageously so. If this makes employees happy and hard working, then it's well worth the investment.

    42. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by areusche · · Score: 1

      Why is this marked flamebait? Cuil is nothing more then those random search pages when you mistype a web address.

    43. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results.

      Try something simple, like Cobol.

      "Java" works fine, though. As does "Ruby". I think they're so young and hip and trendy that they only give young, hip and trendy search results.

      Or maybe they filter really aggressively on pages that they don't think are interesting enough. Google still turns up tons of junk in their results. Cuil is trying something different, and occasionally it works.

    44. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      You want to prevent another bubble? Don't take a job where you're not sure how you or any of your coworkers draw revenue from real customers who in turn receive some service or product that makes complete sense. That's how you prevent a bubble.

      and

      I thought that the problem wasn't with how the IT and Web Site companies were spending their money

      There's a contradiction for you. Found in 0.42 seconds. Heh, Google employee, huh? :P

      Best common sense description for anyone looking for a job. Take whoever pays highest and best suits your skills/interests. :)

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    45. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh yeah, try "beef gurnsey hoof", cuil is useless

      google returns over 8,700 pages

    46. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      And to continue the complaining about Cuil, I also hate their UI. I mean, when I look at results I don't want to have to scan top to bottom AND left to right. Google got this right in their UI, top to bottom is much easier for me.

    47. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Cuil employees get /. mod points along with the strawberries.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    48. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, I wanted to try this myself and accidentally typed "aes zip liniux".

      Of course I got zero results (and also when I fixed the typo).

      However, google responds to the misspelling with:
      Did you mean: aes zip linux
      AND GIVES ME APPROPRIATE SEARCH RESULTS.

      Until CUIL can manage that, they're nowhere CLOSE to google.

    49. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by default+luser · · Score: 1

      I saw the same thing. If you get no search results, try re-submitting your request. It never happened to me twice-in-a-row.

      I think it may be that they're overloaded from all the traffic. You do know that the news of their existence has been spewed on just about every website, including all the major news outlets (MUCH more traffic than Slashdot). I'm amazed they can keep up, considering they really don't have the money for the kind of hardware Google has!

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    50. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by geobeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...a quotation mark, which means "look for this exact phrase".

      I did a Cuil search on my name the other day, just to try it out, and it didn't seem to make a difference whether I used quotes or not. They seem to be the only super-hyped search engine out there that doesn't have any search options.

      If you ask me, their whole business plan is to live like kings until the VC runs out, declare a whopping big loss due to "the uncertainties of the market", then sell the book rights to "How You Can Legally Steal $30 Million from VC Suckers".

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    51. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Vornan19 · · Score: 0

      At least it can find Google! http://www.cuil.com/search?q=google

    52. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I "am" an economist, and a single anecdote DOES prove something.

    53. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by hobbit · · Score: 1

      A Googlewhack comprises two words, not a three-word phrase.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    54. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by SomeGuyTyping · · Score: 1

      I searched "diy electric car" this morning and got ZERO.

      --
      My posts are definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    55. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by rivendahl · · Score: 1

      Yea, but are those 8700 useful? Even 8700 useless links is the same as no results at all. In fact, I'd rather have no results and be frustrated that Cuil couldn't find it than have 8700 results and be frustrated that Google gave me crap. Hmm, maybe not. Damn I hate these dilemas.

      --
      ... there is nothing that has not already been thought ...
    56. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I did a search for some local state government agencies, and Cuil didn't turn up a single one (as if the entire state government simply doesn't exist). Google returned perfectly apprpriate results every time.

      What a joke.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    57. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      And maybe THEY should have waited to have a decent index before they started hyping themselves to everyone who would listen as some sort of "Google killer."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    58. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      That is what is stagnating the economy - everybody is broke, thanks to the price of oil.

      If only the price of oil were going up, that would be true.

      When compared to gold, however, the price of oil has marched lockstep.

      http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&=&q=price+of+oil+in+gold&btnG=Google+Search

      It's the dollar, my friend, that's been falling over the years. The relationship to oil is a 1970's OPEC agreement that STIPULATES oil barrels be always priced in dollars.

      Now, the question of 'why would the dollar be falling' get answered when looking into the behaviors of the banks/lenders and the Federal Reserve. Especially when you consider that 80% of the world really wouldn't mind not doing any business with the good ol' USA these days.

    59. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by toseemod3 · · Score: 1

      I still have to find a single usage of this web site.
      Why do we waste our time again?
      I simply can't understand how they manage to get on Slashdot or major media outlets. They surely burn a lot of advertisment money.

    60. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by cduffy · · Score: 1

      How about when "some jackass" like me CAN afford a house, but his wife and her job leaves him and his teenaged daughters for another man, and he is left raising and supporting those daughters without her income or help, and loses the house that he no longer can afford on his single salary?

      (1) Buying a house in your name without being able to pay for it with only the income that's in your name is a pretty damned bad idea.

      (2) If your ex-wife has the income and you have the kids, shouldn't you be getting child support?

      Or some "jackass" not like me gets his job outsourced? Or gets crippled and can't do that job any more?

      And didn't have the foresight to (1) keep on top of the job market w/ current contacts or (2) pay for long-term disability insurance? Also your own damned fault.

      I didn't have long-term disability insurance until recently. I also bought a dirt-cheap house and avoided having kids (which was a tough sell to the wife) because we couldn't afford them (for a value of "afford" that makes the always-safe assumption that there are hard times ahead). Some of us are responsible for our own actions; what good is that personal responsibility if one can't collect the false impression of moral superiority and +3 bonus to smugness and know-it-all?

      You might try being a little less judgemental there, sparky. BTW calling someone "jackass" just might get you modded "flamebait". Try to be a bit more civil; I was insulted by your callous, judgemental, ignorant comment.

      It's a callous, judgmental, ignorant world.

    61. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Cuil is useless. The phrase I searched ("aresian well" - note spelling) turned up one hit with the phrase and a bunch of "hits" with just one of the words. The one apparently-valid hit went 404 a long time ago. Google turns up the correct pages and a few others that are misspellings of "artesian well".

      Hell, Alta Vista was better than this.

      --
      -- Alastair
    62. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about when "some jackass" like me CAN afford a house, but his wife and her job leaves him and his teenaged daughters for another man, and he is left raising and supporting those daughters without her income or help, and loses the house that he no longer can afford on his single salary?

      Not to be cruel, but yes, you can't afford your house anymore. You got shafted - no doubt. But lots of people do. I can't support every case of bad luck with my tax dollars.

      The stagnant economy isn't a result of bank failures or government bailouts, but is caused by the fact that gasoline prices have quadrupled since the oil barons moved into the White House.

      I believe you missed the implosion of the housing bubble, the credit crunch and the fact that people have reached their spending limit - which is what has propped up the economy in the last 5-6 years. The price of oil is merely the icing on the (poisoned) cake.

      You should care; where do you think they're getting their funding?

      VC funding is not like bank funding. Capital there comes from actual money reserves. VC do not generally work with leveraged money.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    63. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The price of oil is going up world wide. Everything is dependant on oil. Plastics are mode from oil, huge amounts of fuel are used in modern farming, and everything must be transported.

      You are right that the falling value of the dollar in relation to gold is a result of our banks/lenders and the Federal Reserve.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    64. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Hey Alta Vista was pretty sweet.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    65. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Right, because, again, oil is priced in USA dollars when sold to distribution, worldwide.

      Should OPEC change their pricing structure to something else, the world's oil prices would not trend based on the US economy.

    66. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does this qualify for "like with like"

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=cuil&btnG=Search
      http://www.cuil.com/search?q=cuil&sl=long

    67. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by huge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [...]then sell the book rights to "How You Can Legally Steal $30 Million from VC Suckers".

      No, it would be more like "How do you get VC suckers to give you $30 Million". And that, my dear friend, is an art that I'd love to master.

      --
      -- Reality checks don't bounce.
    68. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by discojohnson · · Score: 1

      just because cuil doesn't work just like google doesn't make it inferior. try: aes encryption zip linux ...so you mean that a space drill is different and is used differently it makes it dumb?

    69. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by LibertineR · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm guessing your wife left you for someone with some economic sense?

      Its so amazing how some folks think Bush is an idiot, while at the same time think he is able to control everything so completely. (Here comes the figurehead argument, just watch)

      Oil prices are high due primarily to Speculators who have bid up the market price, in anticipation of domestic supply shortages. The mere mention of offshore drilling off our coasts caused speculators to drop the barrel price by $10 in ONE DAY.

      Everyone blames oil companies for their record profits, when they should be watching profit MARGINS, which have remained static for the past decade for the majors like Exxon and others.

      I'm sorry for your plight, but you make it worse on yourself by not educating yourself on issues upon which you choose to comment.

      Fuel is NOT expensive, except in relation to what you are USED to paying. Spend a day in Italy, and you would LOVE what gasoline costs back here in America.

      Lastly, my poor, uniformed buddy;.... Gas prices have NOTHING to do which bank failures, nothing whatsoever. Banks fail when people cannot repay their loans, which is what happens when banks make bad loans to unqualified people, which happens when the federal government under Bill Clinton ORDERS banks to do just that, which is what created the Mortgage Brokerage industry, and the proceeding Real Estate bubble.

      Flame away, I've got Karma to burn, baby!

    70. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I don't care if some jackass buys a house he can't afford.

      I do care about that. It artificially lifts real estate costs when hundreds of thousands of fake dollars are showered on everyone willing to buy a house. You just couldn't compete with people who were doomed to be foreclosed on, unless you chose to use the fake dollars yourself. And builders went on an orgy of destruction plastering the landscape with the tasteless McMansions demanded by the faux noveau riche with fake money to spare.

      What similar things happen with a douchebag Internet company? They can order so many lunches that no one can afford to eat anymore. They can hire so many personal trainers that you can't find one yourself. They can raise the price of strawberries by filling baskets with them. They can cause a run on BBQ sauce. Most importantly, they make douchebag investors less likely to invest. None of these things though, would involve a bank failure (unless they used bank loans instead of venture capital, I guess). So the analogy can be made, but as you point out, it's silly.

    71. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by ekeko · · Score: 1
      After searching for the work "data":

      cuil returns 1.4 Billion rows

      http://www.cuil.com/search?q=data

      Google returns 2.2 Billion rows

      http://www.google.com/search?q=data

    72. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by zartacla · · Score: 2, Funny

      * google sucks * , searched on google - 618000 results. *google sucks *, searched on cuil - 20055 results. We've got a winner !

    73. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by BuffaloBandit · · Score: 1

      It's also really frustrating that Cuil does not provide language options. When searching for people on Cuil, I tend to get a lot of foreign websites that I can't understand. It would be nice to be able to specify "English Only" websites, if that's what I was after. The only options Cuil has is Safe Search and Typing Suggestions.

    74. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Sosarian · · Score: 1

      My best zero result search so far was just "Cobol"

    75. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      CUIL has a serious issue with it's algorithm and it's learning patterns. So far it appears to be very susceptible to keyword page spam (pages that are nothing but hundreds of repeated keywords) and that it hasn't learned very much in the ways of keyword positioning. Depending on the combination of keywords used, it will often return 0 results, which of course isn't very useful to it's users.

      Beside their currently poor performance, they do get some marks for trying some new user interface simplicity. If only their algorithm was better learned (I'll give it another week or so, so far I've seen it improve a lot already), they really would have a very competitive product. But if they're algorithm hasn't improved enough in a week, I'll forget they were even their.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    76. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      If only the price of oil were going up, that would be true.

      The price of oil is, adjusted for inflation, at about the highest it has been since the mid-19th century.

      When compared to gold, however, the price of oil has marched lockstep.

      Uh. So? While perhaps mildly interesting, gold isn't a reasonably proxy for general price levels or anything else particularly relevant. If the price of oil in gold were constant, that would be no more relevant to whether it was really increasing in price than if the nominal price in dollars were constant (in fact, if we were still on the gold standard, it would be exactly equivalent). The fact is, the price of oil compared to overall price levels (and hourly wages, and just about any other meaningful comparator you can think of) has, overall, been rising pretty strongly since the 2005 production peak.

    77. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by databyss · · Score: 3, Informative

      No results were found for: COBOL

      If youve checked your spelling, you could try using fewer or different keywords to broaden your search.

      Still no luck? Send us your feedback: noresults@cuil.com

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    78. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Oil prices are high due primarily to Speculators who have bid up the market price, in anticipation of domestic supply shortages. The mere mention of offshore drilling off our coasts caused speculators to drop the barrel price by $10 in ONE DAY.

      This is false. Futures trading smooths out commodity pricing and reduces volatility. As long as investors are not creating stockpiles large enough to influence the market, futures trading can not cause increased volatility or sustain a non-market price deviation for very long (more than a few days).

      I'm sorry for your plight, but you make it worse on yourself by not educating yourself on issues upon which you choose to comment.

      I'm reminded of a parable about glass houses and stones... Hmm... It will come to me. :)

      Oil prices are high primarily due to the devaluation of the dollar. The dollar has been under strong inflationary pressure because the US Government has been creating more of them lately. Specifically, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have been funded entirely by deficit spending (creating new US Dollars in the form of Treasury Bills) and not by taking tax revenue away from existing programs.

      These new Treasury Bills are fungible with USD notes in foreign reserve banks, and are the same as cash for those banks. So a few months ago (last time I knew the amount spent), there was at least $480 Billion in shiny new USD floating around, which devalues all of the other USD that you and I have. By extension, it dilutes the value of everything measured in USD, including the value of our bank accounts.

      All commodities are increasing in price. Oil reacts the fastest because that market is the most international. Precious metals are the next fastest commodity to move because they're not consumable and there are processes that allow for easy transfer of ownership without possession (everyone expects the trade to happen very quickly and the actual gold to eventually follow). Consumables like food follow a little more slowly, but the futures markets make sure that they're not too far behind (except for onions, which has no futures market, so prices are all over the place).

      It is Bush's fault, but it's much simpler than people think. There's no need to bring in grand conspiracies or nefarious neocon meddlers in back rooms. If you try to fund expensive projects by printing money, your money loses value. That's what we're doing, and that's what's happening.

    79. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just did a search for my company, one under the company's name, "Langues Vivantes", and one under one of the keywords we would like to place well in, "languages abroad". In both cases we were the first result on the second page. In google, our company's name is first for users in our country, Belgium, and our SEO keywords don't place very well at all.

      You know what this tells me?
      1. Our company is fairly large, so it is very reasonable that people in Belgium looking for our name would see us on the first page. Google does this better.
      2. Our half-assed attempts to capture a couple of key word searches don't work in Google, but they work in Cuil. Cuil is therefore vulnerable to SEO spam.
      3. As for the quality of their index, in both of the searches the little thumbnail cuil puts next to my page was not on my site. In the second case, it was a competitor's logo. The text sample in the search result was on my site, but not on the page Cuil linked to.
      4. The fact that the search results do not line up horizontally makes the page hard to read systematically, but that might be on purpose

      In other words, it is search engine that has a hard time finding relevant results, is vulnerable to spam, and has a confused index.

      I won't be buying stock.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    80. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cuil is a group of ex-Google employees trying to recapture those heady days of Google's startup, starting with the free lunches and culminating in the free party jets flying out of Moffett.

      I wish them the best of luck, the world desperately needs a viable competitor to Google.

    81. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Fuel is NOT expensive, except in relation to what you are USED to paying. Spend a day in Italy, and you would LOVE what gasoline costs back here in America.

      This is a fallacy. The fact that fuel is cheap in the US compared to Italy does not imply that fuel is cheap in the US. It's expensive in both places, just not as bad here as in Italy. To put it another way: what you're saying is like talking to a guy with food poisoning, and saying, "You aren't sick, look at that guy over there with AIDS!". Obviously not true.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    82. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Troll

      How about when "some jackass" like me CAN afford a house, but his wife and her job leaves him and his teenaged daughters for another man, and he is left raising and supporting those daughters without her income or help, and loses the house that he no longer can afford on his single salary?

      Well, maybe your wife left you because you were a jackass...

      Also, the recession in america is probably based on the excessive borrowing that your government does to support the war 'habit' it picked up in 'nam...

    83. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Fuel is only cheap in the USA because the government subsidizes it in the USA. In the end, the consumer still pays for it - in taxes, or some other way (having a recession?)

    84. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Go try and use it. I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results.

      Proof that it works! None of those annoying ad-pages that get high search results through dubious means. No duplicate copycat pages.

      Cuil really trims the fat to give you a stress-free searching experience!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    85. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their index is already out of date by at least 6 months. I have 5 websites, all of which show up on the first two pages of google if I search my name and surname. Cuil finds one page and that is a link to a document that I removed in December.

    86. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      Cuil is not even as good as Yahoo's search or Microsoft's search.

      I have to say, I have newly found respect for Yahoo and Microsoft's search after seeing Cuil. The search relevance, image search, news search, maps, localization/i18n search etc.

      It's not as easy as it often looks.

      And Yahoo/Microsoft are doing a pretty good job. If Google just mysteriously disappears tommorow, I could use Yahoo/Microsoft's search to do my job, but if we're left with something like Cuil, we're all screwed.

    87. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google seems to do a better job at providing a variety of results. When I ego surf on google, I show up, along with the famous people who have my name. When I look on cuil I get something like the first 5 pages full of the same result. Not very useful - I'd rather see variety than depth in the first page.

    88. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Things are changing at Cuil. When their first story was up a few days ago, they returned zero hits on my own name. Now there are returning 55, though Google has MANY more and the top results seem more relevant.

      (I am not famous OR narcissistic, but my name is out there due to work so it is a good test.)

    89. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the jackasses that bought houses they couldn't afford, and are now being foreclosed on, that
      a) Drove up prices to unsustainable levels (which may have led to you paying more for your house than you would have otherwise) and
      b) Are now driving prices down sharply, as their foreclosed houses, often trashed out of spite, are flooding the market (which may have led you to 'lose' your house, since you may have owed more than it was worth, leading to foreclosure/short sale, and your changed circumstances mean that you can't maintain the payments).
      If by lose you mean you simply sold your house & moved into more affordable accommodations, well, that's a reasonable response to changed circumstances. If you were foreclosed on, I'd say that you're part of the normal levels, due to unforeseen circumstances, and not one of the jackasses...

    90. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      How about when "some jackass" like me CAN afford a house, but his wife and her job leaves him and his teenage daughters for another man, and he is left raising and supporting those daughters without her income or help, and loses the house that he no longer can afford on his single salary? Or some "jackass" not like me gets his job outsourced? Or gets crippled and can't do that job any more?

      Unless there's been a massive boom in wives leaving their families in the lurch, outsourcing, and people being crippled, none of this is at all related to the current problems in the real estate market, which is pretty clearly what GP was referring to.

    91. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I just got to know how the US government subsidizes fuel..

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    92. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by superbus1929 · · Score: 1

      Uselessness is in the eye of the beholder... so really, I'd rather have almost 9,000 results that are utter pants than be told to have nothing and like it.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    93. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Searches on your name are not something they need to worry about. I'm pretty impressed by the way they categorize results and provide links to related categories of subjects. Many of the complaints I see such as yours are basically that it doesn't work the same way google does. I think it is a good idea to provide a different type of functionality.

      People that are more detail-oriented like we programmer types want comprehensive results (and wish google let us use regexes), but the overwhelming majority of people don't need that. When they type in "smg", they are either looking up sarah michelle gellar or super mario galaxies or sub machine gun, and those are the categories of results they want and those are what Cuil gives. Again, it seems a pretty good approach to give something that mostly works for most people; it worked for microsoft. :)

    94. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by syukton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everyone blames oil companies for their record profits, when they should be watching profit MARGINS, which have remained static for the past decade for the majors like Exxon and others.

      Can you back up your assertion about profit margins? I took a look myself, and In 1997, the gross and net income of Exxon-Mobil was $137B and $8.4B respectively, or a profit margin of ~6%. The same respective values in 2007 are $404B and $40.6B, or a profit margin of ~10%. Those numbers also represent a 4.83x increase in profit. I'm not an accountant however, so perhaps I'm misreading something.

      Data: SEC 10-K filing for Exxon-Mobil for FY '97 and FY '07. Save the FY '07 document and remove the header garbage, then save it as .html. It's much prettier that way.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    95. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I think you might want to read

      http://www.cuil.com/search?q=rip+off+Venture+capital

      it's funny, laugh!

    96. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by joelwyland · · Score: 1

      From my experience combined with a bit of gut instinct I'd say that if a Googler came up with a big advancement for search they'd get a merit bonus in the tens of thousands of dollars. However, if they quit, develop that big advancement and then sell the company back to the people they are already friends with.... they'd make millions.

    97. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      whoosh. I thought the ";)" was enough to indicate I wasn't serious, but apparently not. Yay mods!

    98. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Again, "whoosh". Apparently winky-smiley-face is without meaning these days... ah well.

    99. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, do this many people /really/ not get that when someone appends ";)" to a post, he or she just /might/ be joking?

    100. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Yep, never would have guessed that ;)

    101. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      *wipes away a tear* At least someone does...

    102. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      It gets 1,427 results now, but of course Google drowns that in 462,000 results. I have noticed that they will get results if you retry later. Not that that is acceptable to me.

    103. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      * - yes, i know, iknow, but it's a work computer so no firefox..

      FirefoxPortable?

    104. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man i find what you did quite helpful to use two search engines at the same time. It actually works well together. cuil searchs for blogs on basic information but when you search a state it finds more then basic info it goes looking for locations and shops. while the other search engines is quite boring. you really don't know what the search will pull up on cuil and that can be good or bad depending on what your looking for.

    105. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Ebirah · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you spelt it "Guernsey"...? Though an illiteracy filter would admittedly be a handy thing for a search engine to have.

      --
      It's never so bad that it can't get worse.
    106. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by colourmyeyes · · Score: 1

      Search for "cuil sucks" or "cuil is just spam and it sucks" (without the quotes) in both Google and cuil.
      (http://www.cornetdesign.com/googlevscuil.html)

      --
      My grandmother used anecdotal evidence all the time, and she lived to be 120 years old.
    107. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Virtual_Raider · · Score: 1

      Seriously what does Cuil do better for users than Google, Yahoo or Microsoft?

      Cuil seems to suck at languages other than English at the moment. I tried a few French and Spanish searches for stuff that I know is not commonly found in English, and the only references it finds are English translations or English articles talking about the matter, but no direct sources. Google is happy to flood you with so many results that the Surf Canyon firefox extension has been a great and welcome addition.

      Also, Cuil interface is ugly. It's home page is black so as to underline the difference with Google's, but the results page is again white background on black foreground and the arrangement of results seems messy because of different-lenght snippets on the columns. That should either be a configurable option, a web 2.0 fancy expandable/on_hover gizmo, or the fields should at least be of the same size; it doen't help when one wants to quickly skim the results to find some relevant title. This arrangement also wastes more screen real estate because you can fit less results per screen. That wouldn't be a big issue if it provided more spot-on results, but it doesn't at this time.

      I wanted to find another search engine recently reviewed whose name I couldn't remember so I searched for "list+of+internet+seach+engines". Cuil's list was useless, but Google delivered in the fist link. In fact, Cuil doesn't cope with typos as well as Google does (I typed "seach" instead of "search"). Or search on it for "Cuil page rank" and see what comes up.

      Finally, by choosing a strange looking name that plays in the quirks of English pronunciation they are failing to come up with a compeling name. I wouldn't pronounce that letter combination as "cool", and i'm sure the same will happen to a lot of people. An unscientific, informal poll around the office showed the same. I don't see people "cooling" for an answer the way they nowadays google it. Addmitedly, this is has nothing to do with search efficiency per se, but the name just bugs me :P

      On the plus side, it's blazingly fast, and it has that Explore by category box. They have been online for an extremely short time so maybe I'll check them out in a few months.

      I still prefer Google as my main search engine choice but when it fails (and it's increasingly struggling to deliver relevant results) I turn to http:www.Clusty.com first and then to Live. I don't think I've used Yahoo more than 20 times since it went online.

      --
      +Raider of the lost BBS
    108. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by TedRiot · · Score: 1

      My name is also out there for many reasons and I tried to search it. The first result was a page that had C64-demos by me from 1988 and 1989. In Google's results the site comes up on page 18 and the first results are things I've been doing recently.

      I thank Cuil for the extremely nostalgic experience, but I feel Google's results are more relevant, especially if someone else is trying to find me.

    109. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by gwniobombux · · Score: 1

      I think that the bigger proof is that their product sucks ass. Go try and use it. I looked for "aes zip linux" and got 0 results. 0 results? Really? You index *more* than google and you can't find ONE reference to "aes zip linux"?

      When did you try it? I just did and got 1,427 results. So as of now, your statement is factually incorrect.

    110. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Adam+Jorgensen · · Score: 1

      Erm, I'm afraid I must disagree. I cuiled for both aes zip linux and "aes zip linux" and both returned results.

    111. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I can't support every case of bad luck with my tax dollars.

      But you can support American Motors, Kodak, IBM, and Haliburton? Sorry, we're going to have to agree to disagree there. I am outraged when a multimillion dollar multinational corporation like IBM gets more money from teh government than it pays in taxes, but I personally have no problem with helping those folks who have been stomped on by life. Maybe it's because even though I'm not doing bad now, I've been stomped on before and know a lot of people getting stomped on now. Must be nice to lead such a sheltered life.

      I believe you missed the implosion of the housing bubble, the credit crunch and the fact that people have reached their spending limit - which is what has propped up the economy in the last 5-6 years

      The housing bubble didn't prop up the economy, the credit crunch is creditors suddenly getting stingy, and people are reaching their spending limits because wages aren't keeping up with the price of goods, all of which are rapidly rising due to the rising price of iol, which everything depends on.

      The wealth of the wealthy during the Reagan years and the prosperity of the middle class and easing of the suffering of the poor during the Clinton years was largely the result of stable and sometimes dropping oil prices during that two decade period. We are now going through what we geezers remember going through in the 1970s.

      VC funding is not like bank funding

      The money being invested in VC is money that can't be invested in banks.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    112. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      (1) Buying a house in your name without being able to pay for it with only the income that's in your name is a pretty damned bad idea.

      It was in both our names. She simply walked away from it.

      (2) If your ex-wife has the income and you have the kids, shouldn't you be getting child support?

      I thought I should, but the judge thought differently.

      And didn't have the foresight to (1) keep on top of the job market w/ current contacts or (2) pay for long-term disability insurance?

      Nobody can forsee (or afford) everything. There's no gurantee that you CAN keep on top of the job narket, or that your disability insurance will cover all the associated costs.

      It's a callous, judgmental, ignorant world.

      Only because of the callous, judgmental, ignorant people who populate it. The only person anone can ever hope to change is one's self. If I'm callous or judgemental (and we all are at times) I hope someone calls me on it. If I'm ignorant I hope someone educates me.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    113. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Flame away, I've got Karma to burn, baby!

      So do I, but I would much rather have a rational conversation than a flame war.

      I'm guessing your wife left you for someone with some economic sense?

      I'll ignore your flamebait and answer rationally - no, he's an auto mechanic who can't hold a steady job. The stupid bitch has been mostly supporting him. I've come far enough that I'm glad she's gone. I've had a lot of good times and met a lot of interesting people I never would have been able to had she not left. And I bought another house, a small one since the kids are grown and gone and I (usually) live by myself.

      Its so amazing how some folks think Bush is an idiot, while at the same time think he is able to control everything so completely.

      I agree. I think he purposely makes people think he's an idiot; the perception has worked well for him. I think he's intelligent but completely and shamelessly devoid of any morals. Rather than stupidly blundering into Iraq as the "Bush is stupid" camp thinks (and I think he wants people to think; "In college, [x] wrote a book. I read one"), I think it was coldly calculated for his and Cheney's own personal gain, at his country's expense.

      You've heard of Hanlon's razor, well, mcgrew's razor says "never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self interest."

      Oil prices are high due primarily to Speculators who have bid up the market price

      I hope you're right but fear you're wrong, because if so then it means it's a bubble. When it bursts everyone except the oil companies will prosper.

      Spend a day in Italy, and you would LOVE what gasoline costs back here in America.

      Only if I didn't have to pay for medical care or health insurance, which is why gasoline is so much more expensive in other countries. The price of gas in the civilized world is mostly taxes. Without medical bills and health insurance I could afford more expensive fuel.

      Banks fail when people cannot repay their loans

      And when their income doesn't rise to meet inflation, they can't repay their loans.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    114. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Only because of the callous, judgmental, ignorant people who populate it. The only person anone can ever hope to change is one's self. If I'm callous or judgemental (and we all are at times) I hope someone calls me on it. If I'm ignorant I hope someone educates me.

      Fair enough. For my part, I'll try to control myself a little better next time I have an attack of Libertarianism.

    115. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by chrish · · Score: 1

      Same deal here... searched for "don't fear the reaper cover" and "city of heroes widget" on the Google/Cuil comparison. Google's results were relevant, Cuil's weren't.

      Reminded me of doing Alta Vista searches and trying to filter the results into what I actually wanted.

      --
      - chrish
    116. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I consider myself a social libertarian. I don't see taxes as anti-liberty (with the exception of property taxes) or unconstitutional; it was amended to allow income taxes. I have no problem with universal health care and in fact think we should join the civilized world and institute it.

      I do, however, have a problem with drug laws, gambling laws, and prostitution laws. A person ought to have the right to screw up his life anyway he sees fit. And I certanly have a problem with asset forfeiture laws, FISA, the PATRIOT act, etc.

      Last summer I was jumped by the DEA and FBI for parking in front of the wrong house (I gave two women friends a ride to a slumlord's property they were cleaning) and had my car searched without my consent (they had "probable cause" since the house next to the vacant house was a dope dealer). I'm certainly against the US police state we have become.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    117. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by LibertineR · · Score: 1
      I applaud your high-road response. I really do.

      Obviously there is much we don't agree upon, so I wont go back into that, but I would ask you to research the fact that when you combine Federal, State and local government taxes on Gasoline in America, because you will discover that their take rivals and in some cases exceeds oil company profits. Start in California, with its 43 different blends of gasoline, and its laws restricting the importation of fuel from surrounding states.

      As someone with insane medical expenses of my own, I draw the line in arguing with persons trying to keep their head above water while battling illness at the same time.

      Good luck and stay well, dude.

    118. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by hobbit · · Score: 1

      If you'd used a pair of quotation marks, people might have thought you were being deliberate.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    119. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Hah - true, that.

    120. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      But you can support American Motors, Kodak, IBM, and Haliburton?

      Strawman. Don't put words in my mouth. Don't assume, either. You have no idea what I've been through.

      The housing bubble didn't prop up the economy, the credit crunch is creditors suddenly getting stingy, and people are reaching their spending limits because wages aren't keeping up with the price of goods, all of which are rapidly rising due to the rising price of iol, which everything depends on.

      Then you didn't pay attention to economists in the past 5 years, or to economic news.

      The money being invested in VC is money that can't be invested in banks.

      That doesn't even make sense. Not to mention that it is completely unrelated to the point I was making.

      Sorry, but you're making zero sense. On top of that, you're insulting. My lack of empathy, which was based on the rational assessment that I can't personally help everybody, is turning to an emotional assessment that you might deserve what you got.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    121. Re:Cuil Proves Nothing by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Right now they give me 1477 results for "aes zip linux", with "safe search" on (which is the default).

  2. I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that many people will say that perks like these are only positives because they can only make people happier about their job, which is good for the employee and good for the employer as well.

    I would like to suggest that it's not all roses in reality. I have worked at places where the employer provided lots of cushy perks and I found that it tends to attract a certain type of employee: the type who wants the job not because they like the work, but because they like the perks. In my experience this type of employee is not the best for the company; and what's worse, the general working environment tends to become antiproductive even for employees who otherwise would be more productive.

    I have found that in Silicon Valley companies, there is almost a sense of pride taken in how unstructured the working environment is. The "cool, hip" companies are the ones that encourage their employees to engage in nerf gun fights, have parties every Friday, and generally play around on company time. Sometimes it is hard for me to believe that these companies can be globally competitive, but maybe companies all over the world are all doing the same things.

    I personally believe that there is a fine balance between too much carrot, and too much stick, but that the answer certainly does not come from throwing the stick out completely. I am most motivated when there are expectations of me, and I have worked at companies where expectations are disturbingly low. I honestly believe that most people, even if they won't admit it, need a bit of structure in their working environment to be most productive.

    There is definitely a desire for people to believe that the best working environment is the one where the employer puts the least demands on its employees and gives all of the best perks possible, and that such an environment would make everyone more productive if only employers weren't so pig-headed and could just realize that ... but I think this is really wishful thinking. It actually worries me that software companies in the USA are often like this because somewhere there must be companies that Just Get Shit Done (India maybe?) without all of the frivolities and eventually, they're going to dominate. And I want the software industry in the USA to stay healthy because that's how I earn my living.

    By the way, I think that it would be hard to out-cushy Google. Their campus is like Club Med and I have a hard time believing that they get anything close to maximum productivity out of their workforce because of it.

    Posting AC because obviously I don't want my current or past employers or coworkers to somehow get word of this and get pissed off at me.

    1. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by gringer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Posting AC because obviously I don't want my current or past employers or coworkers to somehow get word of this and get pissed off at me.

      Or, for that matter, my... er, I mean your future employers or coworkers

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    2. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think there is a balance that is needed. A boring, rigid office will stifle interest and energy, but if it's too silly an office then it's hard to concentrate when the time is right.

      Granted, I've never seen companies pay for daily muffins and stuff (i wonder how many aren't eaten?), but letting your employees have flex time usually lowers stress levels, especially for those with kids.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When the hell did "carrot and stick" meaning "providing an incentive to perform" (the proverbial carrot at the end of a stick) start being so widely misused as "the combined use of incentives and punishments" (be good get a carrot, be bad get beat by the stick)? This is a bastardization on the order of taking "turn the other cheek" to mean "look the other way".

    4. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would very much have to agree. If you have a bunch of extra money to spend on employee perks, make it on stuff that actually helps them get stuff done. Get them all good chairs, good workstations with multiple monitors, and private offices. Make it a place people want to work instead of a place where people want to goof off. Having a keg of beer and a block of cheese may seem like some nice perks, but it's not going to help the company get any work done. And it actually really detracts from people who actually want to build anything. Because to do any work, they have to go sit on their $40 office chair, and work on their P2 computer, with a 14 inch CRT.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nothing wrong with a decent environment. Keep in mind that particularly in tech companies getting the best can make a big difference. A great coder can get more done than 10 mediocre ones but only cost 2 or 3 times as much to pay. The best and brightest who are already earning enough that money isn't a big problem in their lives are also more likely to want to work somewhere where they're happy rather than going for that extra 5K per year. Sure you could just up the pay but if the cost of the perks/parties is less than what you'd have to pay those same people to keep them in a horrible workplace then you're better off going with the snacks and cola. that being said, people who are not decent workers should be dropped like a rock if they're simply not getting the work done.

    6. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The "cool, hip" companies are the ones that encourage their employees to engage in nerf gun fights, have parties every Friday, and generally play around on company time.

      Oh, I see! If you have a relaxed atmosphere, that must necessarily mean that there are no expectations and no demands. Interesting premise. Grossly ignorant and wrong... but interesting.

    7. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by hobbit · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new carrot-and-stick definition. Unlike the completely redundant misuse of "turn the other cheek" you mention, it's actually quite useful to be able to say "too much carrot and not enough stick" or similar.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    8. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by houghi · · Score: 1

      This is a bastardization on the order of taking "turn the other cheek" to mean "look the other way".

      Indeed because "turn the other cheek" means to bend over and show those cheeks. Right? RIGHT? What did I win?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    9. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by JoeMerchant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To paraphrase the parent and add my own perspective: the perks aren't the problem if the people are productive.

      Lunch ordered in costs maybe $7 to $15 a head, and unless your employees would be bringing brown bags and eating them at their desk, saves at least 30 minutes of travel and waiting time to and from getting lunch. So, call cost of lunch $11, in return for 30 minutes of productivity - how many of your employees earn less than $22 an hour? And, those that do earn less than $22 an hour probably really appreciate the free lunch, possibly enough that they won't be jumping ship to a company down the street that might pay them $2 an hour more.... Most Google'ers are notoriously underpaid on a cash basis.

      Free gym membership - $30 per month - this one is a little more esoteric, and I can see how working out actually takes time away from working on other things, but if the gym is conveniently located to work, it discourages people from getting a gym membership near their home, makes their life more work-centric, and possibly improves their cardio-vascular health - which actually does have a direct positive effect on cerebral productivity.... Similarly for the doctor on-site one day a week, convenient, health benefiting, time saving, and the cost is near trivial when you compare it to the benefits...

      Now, this is all moot if your employees simply show up to take advantage of the benefits and don't actually do anything productive otherwise... but, these are likely the same employees you find at perkless companies who spend their time surfing the web, making personal phone calls, and leaving their post to run errands 10 hours a week and more. (and posting lengthy responses on /. (oops!)).

    10. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my cousin Anon Coward. Just a quick reply over your long piece: if you "want the software industry in the USA to stay healthy because that's how I earn my living", shouldn't you learn how to write in proper English first?
      For your "India = Get S**t Done" correlation, seems more like you are one of the H1Bearers than a real born-and-bred citizen...
      That is the point, we in the USA can get all the perks because we are an ELITE group within the IT professionals of the World... Things are different here, my friend, that is why I am going to eat my cookies now, and sip a bit of my delicatessen coffee, while playing Video Games on my 30 inch plasma monitor...

    11. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Same way as other terms like "Superpower" (nation with no sphere of influence, but true global reach), "Second world" (Soviet bloc), and "Eurotrash" (trust fund beneficiaries and dabblers in the arts, have the money to participate but are otherwise emptyheaded).

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    12. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

      "...India maybe..."? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH.....You are truly funny!

      --
      Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    13. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by elrous0 · · Score: 0
      Language is fluid, my friend. You can either deal with it or spend the rest of your life being that annoying prick who smugly corrects anyone who uses the word "irony" to mean anything other than its classical literary meaning (you know, the guy no one wants to be friends with).

      And if you really want to bitch, complain about what's happened to the term "gay."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by billcopc · · Score: 1

      I want the software industry in the USA to stay healthy because that's how I earn my living.

      Easy solution: move to India!

      But seriously, I also roll my eyes at excessive perks. It really gives the impression that they're bleeding VC money for the hell of it. There's a balance between comfort and productivity, a sweet spot where they mutually enhance each other, but too much of one will cramp the other.

      For me, that sweet spot is a combination of flex time, relaxed dress code (so I can wear my t-shirt hell), and no bean-counters. I do what needs doing, and if I fall behind I fully expect someone to call me on it, but otherwise stay out of my hair. I think that whole attitude comes from the fact that I'm more of an independent entrepreneur kinda guy, and I passionately despise office drones.

      I work in a semi-creative environment where you can't be 100% productive all the time, but you most certainly can be 300% productive some of the time then have a dry spell for a day or two. I make the most of my peak days, and leave early when I'm useless... it balances out and I'm happy as a clam. Most importantly, it's not a huge burden on the company to get me in that happy zone - I don't need on-site massage therapists, catered lunches and private movie theaters. Perhaps that's because, unlike Cuil, my employers acknowledges and respects the fact that I have a life outside of work. I don't need my job to be a vacation, because I take real vacations. I don't even want a stocked fridge, because I like taking a walk down to the store once a week to pick up a case of pop and some snacks - it's a small escape from the office, which often leads to creative spurts upon my return.

      No matter how cushy your job is, it's still work. The psychological association remains and there's nothing you can do about it. You know how business owners are often workaholic nutjobs ? That's because they fail to isolate work from the rest of their life. When you don't have a clear distinction, your brain gets really confused!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    15. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Zackbass · · Score: 1

      Not just what we think of as 'tech' jobs on Slashdot either. Tradition engineering, graphic design, writing, research, marketing, even *gasp* business management fall under the same umbrella. I've found that most jobs that require a hard to develop skills are much the same. I could care less if an engineer isn't even 80% productive, if he's the one that suggests the design improvement or catches the error that saves the product then it's worth it to try to get him on the team. I'd much rather have the employee that has reliably solid work and demands to be happy at work than the one that spends the extra 20% of productivity muddling along (which is what my experience with the vast majority of engineers has been). A lot of jobs don't come down to how much you get done in a day, but whether what you did was worthwhile.

      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    16. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by eeek77 · · Score: 1

      My take on this is very simple. I like to work at work and play at home. (Well, actually, a lot of my "play" at home might be considered work to some.)

      Work does need to be enjoyable, BUT.....

      Doing all this extra stuff at work seems to imply to me that it's expected for employees to spend lots of extra time at the workplace. (Eventually, something needs to get done, right?)

      If given the choice, I'd rather work harder for less time then get home to those who I'd much rather be with (wife and children).

      I currently have a nice, livable work environment. I like it, but it's not wildly exciting.

      I work to live rather than live to work. And I don't think amount of job perks could ever change that. My family is just too important to me.

      Fortunately, I think this sentiment is felt throughout most of our company.

    17. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      It's been awhile since I've read about Google, but don't they partially solve this by making people share offices?

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    18. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "people who are not decent workers should be dropped like a rock if they're simply not getting the work done." 09:44AM on a thursday on slashdot

    19. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I have found that in Silicon Valley companies, there is almost a sense of pride taken in how unstructured the working environment is. The "cool, hip" companies are the ones that encourage their employees to engage in nerf gun fights, have parties every Friday, and generally play around on company time. Sometimes it is hard for me to believe that these companies can be globally competitive, but maybe companies all over the world are all doing the same things.

      Most companies are doing the same thing, but to management instead of programmers. This attracts a certain kind of manager that's more interested in money and perks than in doing their work properly, and that enables smaller companies to compete with them.

      Seriously, most large companies waste millions without even blinking. The only reason they can compete at all is that they have those millions.

    20. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a couple of friends who have worked for Google, it is sorta like college but with more accountability. Yeah, you get the "chill" working environment -- but you sure as hell better get your work done on time and well. As I understand it, it is the same environment that the total badasses in college had (if they so choose).

    21. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by jambox · · Score: 1

      Wiki agrees with you.

      However, if it's wrongly used then the perpetrator is in good company

      --
      You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?
    22. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, hiring the right kind of people is a problem in its own right. All companies, whether they have cushy perks or not, attract a lot of wannabe-employees who really shouldn't be hired. You can't blame the perks for that.

    23. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by tsa · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new carrot and stick overlords!

      --

      -- Cheers!

    24. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its ironic that you mention those annoying prick's, because I was just thinking of them.

    25. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have worked at places where the employer provided lots of cushy perks and I found that it tends to attract a certain type of employee: the type who wants the job not because they like the work, but because they like the perks.

      So you're basically saying that at some companies, people care about how much they're compensated? Oh the horror! Don't forget that perks are and should be considered part of the compensation package. The reason why perks exist is because it's extra "carrot" that is generally more cost effective for the company than raising salaries.

      In my experience this type of employee is not the best for the company;

      I suppose you're right...the ideal employee would be 100% productive, and love the work they do so much that they don't care about the job perks or how they're compensated. Good luck with that.

    26. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, I think that it would be hard to out-cushy Google. Their campus is like Club Med and I have a hard time believing that they get anything close to maximum productivity out of their workforce because of it.

      They still have Gmail in beta, are not they?

    27. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure, but I imagine the motivation for all the health perks has to do with saving on health insurance rates.

    28. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I have worked at places where the employer provided lots of cushy perks and I found that it tends to attract a certain type of employee: the type who wants the job not because they like the work, but because they like the perks.

      Likewise, paying people well attracts employees that like the money, not the work; if you want to only attract employees with a fanatical devotion to the work, you should lock your employees in a dungeon, beat them hourly, and pay them nothing.

      The reason people offer money, perks, etc. to attract employees is to attract employees that are good at the work (whether they like it or not), that might otherwise choose to do that work for someone offering better money or perks, or offering less money and perks but in a better geographical location for that worker, etc.

    29. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason it works is because of the old addage: In software, your most productive employees are orders of magnitude more productive than your least productive employees. And why..... their brains work differently. So a company full of high talent employees who each work 4 hrs a day will still be 15 times as productive as a company full of untalented empoloyees working 60 hour weeks.

    30. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      What's so funny about that? I've worked with some very talented people from India. If you think we beat them hands down every time, I'd say you're wrong.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    31. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I am most motivated when there are expectations of me

      See I'm just the opposite. If someone is riding me like Seattle Slew, I'm going to get really bogged down in my work, get pissy, try to take a few extra minutes on lunch, and other petty things.

      If I'm given the perks and "me time" I'll probably end up using the "me time" to actually do something work related. It was the same thing when I was in CS classes. I didn't want to do any of my assignments, but when I was on break, I was downloading source like crazy and reading it so I could be a better coder. Truth-in-advertising: it didn't take; I'm an atrocious programmer.

      It seems like if an authority figure tells me to do X, I absolutely hate doing X, but if he leaves me to my own devices, I love X, and will also get Y and Z done in record speed.

    32. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Knara · · Score: 1

      Law firms seem to have these sorts of perks. I've heard of others having it as well. Not really that crazy. I think that a lot of slashdotters just work for shitty employers :D

    33. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      At a company I used to work at, they had a fantastic summer flex plan - work an hour a day extra Mon-Thurs, get off Friday at 1pm. Friday afternoons off in the summer was an amazing morale booster, and everyone came in refreshed and in good spirits on Monday.

      Then the corporate giant which had purchased our small company got wind of it, and told the president that this sort of thing was not to happen. He fought it and lost.

      The best part was how we were always unable to get in touch with our corporate overlords on Friday afternoons, while we slaved miserably away.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    34. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      timezones

    35. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      I personally believe that there is a fine balance between too much carrot, and too much stick, but that the answer certainly does not come from throwing the stick out completely. I am most motivated when there are expectations of me, and I have worked at companies where expectations are disturbingly low.

      The best software people aren't motivated by the carrot or the stick. A real hacker obsessed with a problem can often be more productive than 10 average people (even if they're competent and work hard.) These types don't care about the expectations. They'll get the job done quickly and effectively because they're driven to do it for their own satisfaction. I think the idea behind the perks is to attract those people and keep them comfortable once they've been hired. A few bowls of fruit are pretty cheap if it gets you people who are naturally productive with little or no external pressure.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    36. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by pavon · · Score: 1

      Do people normally charge their lunch break? Our work day is 8 hours not including lunch with 4 hours where everyone is required to be in the office. Working more than 8 hours banks you flex time. So if you take a long lunch it just means you have have to stay longer or show up earlier.

    37. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Lunch ordered in costs maybe $7 to $15 a head, and unless your employees would be bringing brown bags and eating them at their desk, saves at least 30 minutes of travel and waiting time to and from getting lunch. So, call cost of lunch $11, in return for 30 minutes of productivity

      You're assuming that employees would be going out for lunch. In most companies people eat in the works canteen or bring their own food, paid for themselves. So you're spending $15 for no time gain at all. Multiply that over a thousand employees and that's $15k a day extra expense, or $3.5 million a year. I'd bet it would be more motivating to give each employee a $3.5k payrise, especially during these hard economic conditions.

      Even if people were spending 30 minutes a day going out for lunch, you're assuming that the employees will accept having their lunch break cut by those 30 minutes if their lunch is delivered to them.

      how many of your employees earn less than $22 an hour?

      That's around the median wage, so probably half of them.

      And, those that do earn less than $22 an hour probably really appreciate the free lunch, possibly enough that they won't be jumping ship to a company down the street that might pay them $2 an hour more.

      People would turn down a $16 a day payrise for a $7 dinner every day, that they might not even want? People on low incomes don't give a shit about perk benefits, they'd rather have the cash. But then you've probably never had a final rent demand so you wouldn't understand this.

    38. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      When the hell did "carrot and stick" meaning "providing an incentive to perform" (the proverbial carrot at the end of a stick) start being so widely misused as "the combined use of incentives and punishments" (be good get a carrot, be bad get beat by the stick)?

      It never changed, you just learned it wrong the first time and haven't bothered to learn the correct meaning ever since. "Carrot and stick" is not "Carrot on a stick".

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/carrot%20and%20stick

    39. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of flex hours. As long as you can make people be productive at work, it's a good idea. It's no use if everybody stays an extra hour a day, but spends the extra hour at the office Foosball table. The flip side of keeping people productive is you don't need 50-60 hour work weeks, because people actually get stuff done, instead of spending half the time just socializing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    40. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I was just going by my experience at a mid-sized (500 employee) med device company... for the engineering staff, lunch was eaten out about 80% of the time - this was a social networking thing, bad for the health, but good for exchanging political information. Lunch started when you walked out the door and ended when you walked back in, it usually ran just under an hour, but maybe one day a week would run closer to 90 minutes. If that staff were given a $3.5K pay raise, it really wouldn't change anything.

      And, no, I've never had a final rent demand, but I did live on my own for a bit over 2 years in grad school, paying my own rent and expenses on $14K per year income. During those years, any kind of free food was actively sought and rabidly consumed by myself and my similarly cash strapped friends. The Mexican restaurants likely lost net money on us (purchase one $2 margarita, consume a pound of free chips, dips, and other finger foods), but we did spend a couple of hours there every Friday, I think we were more regularly present than the wait staff.

      What I've found over the years is that focusing on doing a job well is what nets the greatest long-term benefits. Micromanaging expenses, benefits, comparing competitive offers, moonlighting, etc. are all distractions from doing a primary job as best you can.

      If you are in a job that you can do well, and it's a job worth doing, and they're paying you enough to meet your (necessary) expenses, and the organization recognizes and rewards you for a job well done, then all is good with the world. That's a lot of ifs, and a couple of them are very hard to get in your control, and if those out of your control are in the wrong state - it's probably time to polish and circulate the resume.

      Point of the ramble is simply that: if you're in a good spot, yes, having somebody take care of things like getting a decent lunch once in awhile and getting basic medical care on-site are worth more to the company (as a whole) than they cost. If you're in a bad spot, an extra $5K per year isn't going to change jack, it's still a bad spot, and bad spots aren't likely to give you the perks or the cash, anyway.

    41. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      In so-called 'exempt' positions, there's not a time-card, you work as long as it takes to get the job done. It is generally frowned upon to come in after 9, leave before 5, and take too long for lunch. Most places I have been see people coming in around 8-8:30 and leaving generally around 5. In the higher-up positions, they also don't count vacation days, you're expected to take about 2 weeks a year, but if you've got your department running like a well-oiled clock, then taking three three week vacations a year is also possible.

      I've seen 'exempt' get out of control, both ways - one VP started coming in at 11 and leaving at 3, that lead to time-sheets all around for a couple of years. It's more common to slide in the other direction, I've seen guys come in at 7am, leave at 6pm - eat, tuck their kids into bed, then come back to work for another couple of hours because they had "so much to do." In the bigger picture, I've found that after about 50 hours a week, I'm fried - I can be present and look like I'm working, but the quality of my work really drops off - if I'm programming, it actually becomes negative productivity at some point.

      In theory, the exempt status workaholics are bucking for promotion, but in practice it almost never works out that way.

    42. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by pavon · · Score: 1

      Hmm, all of the exempt/salary positions I have had expect you to work as long as it takes to get the job done with no overtime pay. But you still have to fill out a time card, and are still expected to charge anything less than 40 hours to vacation or flex time, and can bank flex time if you work over 40 hours. There are always folks that work long hours and either don't charge flex time or never get around to using it. But the other direction doesn't happen - if you make a habit of showing up late, leaving earlier or taking long lunches and not making up for it, it isn't just frowned on but considered time-card fraud.

    43. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      If this bothers you (time card accounting) you might want to look into smaller companies - I've had good luck with the smaller places, no 30 year career in a single place for me, but my first job ran 12 years before the new CEO crashed and burned the operation - I have lots of friends working for "big" places that have had less job security, more frequent layoffs, etc.

      In the bigger company I worked for, it was largely up to your department director how the time card situation was handled. My boss was pretty cool about it all, as was most of design engineering. If you got near manufacturing, they were the opposite - more as you describe.

      Strict time accounting isn't the worst thing in the world, but I do think it's a bit fantastical to believe that your employees are delivering value just because they're occupying a chair.

      With fuel costs in the US doubling in the last 2 years, it's going to get even more interesting, since many jobs can be accomplished via telecommuting - people who drive 60+ miles a day in their SUV are burning $80 a week in gasoline, not to mention spending up to 2 hours a day on the road. Letting them work from home has very obvious benefits, if the corporation can learn to trust its worker bees.

    44. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you're in a bad spot, an extra $5K per year isn't going to change jack, it's still a bad spot, and bad spots aren't likely to give you the perks or the cash, anyway.

      What if your profit margin is $10k per year per employee? Then that $5k is going to half your profits.

    45. Re:I'm not sure this is as good as it sounds by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      If you're in a bad spot, an extra $5K per year isn't going to change jack, it's still a bad spot, and bad spots aren't likely to give you the perks or the cash, anyway.

      What if your profit margin is $10k per year per employee? Then that $5k is going to half your profits.

      Businesses with thin margins like that (WalMart, for instance) are usually not great career choices.

      Also, I was speaking from the perspective of the employee - $14K per year in a graduate assistantship is a far better way to live than $19K per year as manager at McD's. Even if you might eventually make $24K per year as manager (that's a 26% increase, almost double what the TA is making!!!) your life is still going to suck. Even if you're stuck at $14K/year as a teaching assistant for a decade, the perks aren't bad, and you can have a decent quality of life. I managed to pay for my own 3 month European vacation while making only $14K/year, I didn't stay in the finest hotels or gamble in the casino, but it was a good time anyway.

  3. The bubble is back! by 2.7182 · · Score: 1, Funny

    But if we are smart, we can still make money. I recommend selling short on Google now.

    1. Re:The bubble is back! by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But if we are smart, we can still make money. I recommend selling short on Google now.

      I recommend not taking stock tips from /.

      Unless of course enough of us get together and actually move the market in the direction we want.
      But I suspect /.ers don't have that kinda cash on hand.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:The bubble is back! by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I suspect /.ers don't have that kinda cash on hand.

      But they could easily get some. Not legally, but round off a few fractions of a penny to a bank account and if you get caught, the worst they would ever do is they would put you for a couple of months into a white-collar, minimum-security resort! Shit, we should be so lucky! Do you know, they have conjugal visits there?

    3. Re:The bubble is back! by iknowcss · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a bad feeling that all of this is going to bring us to a conversation that involves the phrase "pound-me-in-the-ass prison"

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    4. Re:The bubble is back! by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno if it's really at that great at club fed... i mean, that spammer went *wacko* there...

      What the hell is selling short, anyway?

    5. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like it just did.

    6. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Sell short a stock you know is going down.
      Step 2: ???
      Step 3: Profit!

    7. Re:The bubble is back! by AmaDaden · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a bit messy but it's something like this...
      1) barrow some stock from some and promise to give it back in the following few(i forget the longest you can do this for) months.
      2) Sell it.
      3) Wait for said stock to fall.
      4) Buy it at what you hope is a lower price.
      5) give it back to the owner.

      It's called selling short because you can only have it sold for a 'short' period before you have to buy it back again. Basically you bet that said stock will fall. As strange as it sounds it's fairly common in Wall Street

    8. Re:The bubble is back! by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 3, Funny

      But I suspect /.ers don't have that kinda cash on hand.

      But they could easily get some. Not legally, but round off a few fractions of a penny to a bank account and if you get caught, the worst they would ever do is they would put you for a couple of months into a white-collar, minimum-security resort! Shit, we should be so lucky! Do you know, they have conjugal visits there?

      God! I'm looking up money laundering in the dictionary ...

      --
      Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    9. Re:The bubble is back! by flitty · · Score: 4, Informative

      Naked Short Selling (while we are off topic) is doing the same thing, but borrowing the same "stock" several times (since you have a short time before you actually have to hand over the paper) and creating "virtual" stocks that you then sell short. Absolutely destructive and devaluing of stocks. For a little audio discussion, I think it's this link

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    10. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you know, they have conjugal visits there?

      You realise that you still have to find yourself a partner, right?

    11. Re:The bubble is back! by rochi · · Score: 1, Funny

      just don't touch my stapler.

    12. Re:The bubble is back! by sharpone · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I suspect /.ers don't have that kinda cash on hand.

      But they could easily get some. Not legally, but round off a few fractions of a penny to a bank account and if you get caught, the worst they would ever do is they would put you for a couple of months into a white-collar, minimum-security resort! Shit, we should be so lucky! Do you know, they have conjugal visits there?

      I'm a married man, and I haven't had a conjugal visit in 6 months.

    13. Re:The bubble is back! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      maybe you should try lowering the barrier between the sides ?

    14. Re:The bubble is back! by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      I dunno if it's really at that great at club fed... i mean, that spammer went *wacko* there...

      What the hell is selling short, anyway?

      To be fair he probably wasn't all that sane going in to club fed.

    15. Re:The bubble is back! by PacketShaper · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So you are implying the regulars on slashdot would need conjugal visits?

      you must be new here.

    16. Re:The bubble is back! by PDHoss · · Score: 1

      Except if you end up tangling with Superman. Even when he's crocked and flicking peanuts at the barroom mirror, he's still a bad mofo.

      --
      ======================================
      Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
    17. Re:The bubble is back! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I'm a married man, and I haven't had a conjugal visit in 6 months.

      Surprised they haven't found that to be unconstitutional yet. 8th Amendment and all...

    18. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What use would the average slashdotter have for conjugal visits?

    19. Re:The bubble is back! by shic · · Score: 1

      I recommend selling short on Google now.

      Using monopoly money, this is exactly what I did last week (the day before cuil was announced) as an exercise.

      I deem myself to have shorted Google using a "contract for difference" at 486 with a stop-loss at 535 - and also accepted a "put option" for Jan 09 for a strike price of 500 that cost me 59.

      I'm watching my progress with interest.

    20. Re:The bubble is back! by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not messy (as in complicated) and it isn't strange. It is just a way to bet that a stock will go down. No stranger than a put option.
      I am not sure where the terms "long" and "short" come from, but I don't think that short has any relation to what you are saying. You borrow the stock for an indeterminate amount of time. The entity loaning you the stock has the ability to ask for it back at any time.
      It is uncommon because, unlike owning a stock/being "long", you have unlimited downside risk. If the stock keeps going up, you lose more and more money. Also, there has to be someone willing to lend the stock.
      As always, Wikipedia:
      Short selling
      Put option

      --
      This post climbed Mt. Washington.
    21. Re:The bubble is back! by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1

      Or you could do it like Enron did!

    22. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      and creating "virtual" stocks that you then sell short

      Worse than that, you never deliver any of the shares to the buyers, and return the stock you borrowed back to the original owner. No money changes hands (so it's "not fraud" lol), you're out nothing, but the stock's value has been reduced, all because it appears to "the market" that someone is trying to dump a whole lot of the stock for cheap, often triggering a lot of automatic bail-out trades driving the stock down.

    23. Re:The bubble is back! by Experiment+626 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a married man, and I haven't had a conjugal visit in 6 months.

      That's really unfortunate. Your wife is awesome in bed.

    24. Re:The bubble is back! by encoderer · · Score: 1

      Often it doesn't involve borrowing anything.

      You're a broker at a big brokerage.

      You have a client that says "Buy $1MM worth of XXXX"

      You reply "Their share price is $100, you now own 10,000 shares. Congrats"

      (But you personally think the stock will fall, so you don't actually buy anything. You take the $1MM, put it in the brokerage account, and wait)

      If the stock price DOES fall, you try to ride it as low as you think it'll go. Then you buy 10,000 shares. Say the price is only $75 per share, you just made a quarter million bucks.

      If the stock doesn't fall, well, that's the risk of this particular technique. You tell your boss, and if you're good at your job and make the company money, no biggie you're allowed to be wrong sometimes.

      But if you're not...?

    25. Re:The bubble is back! by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... What use would the average slashdotter have for conjugal visits? ...

      His cell-mate would be out on his visit so he would get to use the magazine this time.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    26. Re:The bubble is back! by darthnoodles · · Score: 2, Funny

      Possible solutions:
      -Push the beds together tonight.
      -Stop playing games until the wee hours of the morning. Try going to bed at the same time as your wife.
      -Stop watching porn until the wee hours of the morning. Again, try going to bed at the same time as your wife.

    27. Re:The bubble is back! by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      If the bubble is back, where is my 100%+ gains in my stock portfolio year over year? What kind of bubble is it if your stocks are losing?

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    28. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have those in regular prison too--only problem is they're from the guy in the cell next door.

    29. Re:The bubble is back! by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      I haven't had a conjugal visit in months... where do I sign up?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    30. Re:The bubble is back! by AmaDaden · · Score: 1
      Hmmm you're right about the term. I remember hearing the reasoning I said from somewhere.

      (From Wiki)It is commonly understood that "short" is used because the short seller is in a deficit position with his brokerage house.

      I called it messy and strange because I found it to be messy and strange. Selling someone else's stock and saying "Don't worry you'll get it back" is not something that I would think would be a common and legal practice on Wall Street but it is. Additionally without someone putting it in such simple terms I've found it hard to figure out what it all means. I'm not big on the ways of money but I've started to read about it recently. I've found that it's all very simple but put in overly complex terms.

    31. Re:The bubble is back! by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 1

      I think it is overly complex because people want to be very precise with their money. As for "Don't worry, you'll get it back," the short seller's broker maintains a margin account which is adjusted based on the gain/loss of the short sale. There is collateral on the loan.

      --
      This post climbed Mt. Washington.
    32. Re:The bubble is back! by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      They marked you Funny (and your post is funny), but sadly it might be Insightful as well. If she isn't giving it to her husband, she's probably giving it do someone else.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    33. Re:The bubble is back! by jadavis · · Score: 1

      I called it messy and strange because I found it to be messy and strange.

      Short selling can help balance out markets because when the market starts to go down, the short sellers are buying stocks and therefore mitigating the downturn.

      Other "strange" things can also help balance out markets, like buying futures. People keep talking about "evil oil speculators", but the fact is, they drive up the price now which causes us to conserve oil, so that the price doesn't spike so much in the future.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    34. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as good as your sister.

    35. Re:The bubble is back! by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      This method is highly illegal, if you accept money for the trade you are obligated to complete it in a timely manner for your client. This is why stock brokers require a license.

    36. Re:The bubble is back! by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely destructive and devaluing of stocks.

      Funny, The Economist covered short-selling this week and discussed why selling, even naked short-selling, is good for the markets. Hmmm, who would I trust - the 150-year-old Economist, the best newsmagazine in the world, which is staffed by people who've forgotten more about economics and finance than the best MBAs ever learn, or...NPR, staffed by Vasser socialites whose dads contributed to political parties. Hmmm.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    37. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she isn't giving it to her husband, she's probably giving it do someone else.

      *rolls eyes* yeah, that MUST be it. You're a bit cynical.

    38. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the "+5 Just Wrong" when you need it?

    39. Re:The bubble is back! by Knara · · Score: 1

      The opinion that short selling (though I'm not a big fan of naked short selling -- i think that you should have to borrow the equity before you actually sell it) is somehow unmitigated evil seems to be mainly the domain of people who 1) don't understand how the market works and 2) market cheerleaders that think anything making the market go down is bad :( :( :(

    40. Re:The bubble is back! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      I have a question. In these conjugal visits, you get to have sex with women?

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    41. Re:The bubble is back! by Knara · · Score: 1

      a 12-dimensional, inverted, Buffetian sphere :D

    42. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there has to be someone willing to lend the stock.

      For an interest, why wouldn't anyone? Basically, it would be a two-way bet: short seller bets on falling rate higher then interest rate, lender bets on stocks at least not falling at rate higher then interest rate (but if they rise, lender scored even more, so there is motivation to lend).

    43. Re:The bubble is back! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      This is probably a joke, but for the sake of argument, why are you still with her?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    44. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see her slashdot karma!

    45. Re:The bubble is back! by SdnSeraphim · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a married man, and I haven't had a conjugal visit in 6 months.

      I don't get this, unless both of you have agreed to be celibate. I hear this a lot, and my wife and I have discussed this, and she doesn't understand it either. I knew a couple that each privately said to me that they wished they had more sex, and yet they couldn't ask their partner. It's crazy!
      IANAP, but it seems that discussing this with your partner would be your best bet. Of course, I may not be in a typical relationship, as I don't have a bad word to say about my in-laws, or about my wife or the amount of sex my wife and I have. So YMMV.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong. - Voltaire
    46. Re:The bubble is back! by LotsOfPhil · · Score: 1

      For an interest, why wouldn't anyone? Basically, it would be a two-way bet: short seller bets on falling rate higher then interest rate, lender bets on stocks at least not falling at rate higher then interest rate (but if they rise, lender scored even more, so there is motivation to lend).

      Because if you lend your stock to someone, you can't sell it (close out your position) until you get it back. It inhibits your ability to trade freely. If you *have* to sell but can't, that would probably suck. The rates go up as the stock becomes less and less available to sell short (they are called "hard to borrow").

      --
      This post climbed Mt. Washington.
    47. Re:The bubble is back! by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      while you're in prison, you can show them your "O" face

      --
      mod me funny
    48. Re:The bubble is back! by acheron12 · · Score: 1

      But if the price goes up, your losses are potentially unlimited. Unlike buying shares, where the worst that can happen is that you lose your initial investment.

      --
      there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    49. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know, they have conjugal visits there?
      We even have unlimited internet access here (posting as AC for obvious reasons).

    50. Re:The bubble is back! by WNight · · Score: 1

      They do level out markets because they (futures of any form) are a way to average the value over time like a sliding window average. The same as selling between two places, one that has and one that has not, you sell between times. People have a resource now (and thus undervalue it) or don't (and overvalue it) and will enter into contracts expecting the supply to remain constant, someone who expects a change can exploit this the same way as someone moving goods between physical areas.

      And, as you pointed out, for the good of everyone by smoothing the economy, not harmfully as some "evil speculation" would suggest. (Really, the money they make is how we say thanks for having oil sitting around for us to buy that someone would have used last month had they not hung onto it - if we didn't want it we could just say no...)

    51. Re:The bubble is back! by Brikus · · Score: 1

      You know what I'm talkin' about!

    52. Re:The bubble is back! by kfaroo · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "short" doesn't refer to the duration of time before you have to buy it back, but to the fact that you are selling something that you do not have in reality (as in "I am short a few bucks"). Short-selling, by extension, refers to the practice of selling stock in the belief that the price will go down in the future. And being "long on" a stock implies that you hold a positive position in the belief that the price will go up.

    53. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as James Bond doesn't rush in foil your plans.

    54. Re:The bubble is back! by hf256 · · Score: 1

      IANAP -- I Am Not A P**s? What the heck is with all the IANAx anyway?

    55. Re:The bubble is back! by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      It's called "short" selling because you're "short" the stock; i.e., you don't own it when you sell it.

    56. Re:The bubble is back! by VoidEngineer · · Score: 1

      Absolutely destructive and devaluing of stocks.

      Yeah, but sometimes you have to tear things down to build them back up. Stocks can easily get overpriced, and selling short is one of the market pressures that brings them back to their correct market values. Sure, there are people who purchased the overpriced stock who are going to be upset when it turns out that they payed too much for their investment. But that's the nature of the market. Anybody who thinks that stock prices should only go up is a fool and shouldn't be investing in the first place.

    57. Re:The bubble is back! by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Funny, The Economist covered short-selling this week and discussed why selling, even naked short-selling, is good for the markets."

      So, doing something illegal is now considered good? I believe the rules state that you have to at least "borrow" the equity before you short it....

    58. Re:The bubble is back! by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      I believe the only part you left out was that the first person to 'buy' the 10,000 shares at $100 per share buys it 'on margin' meaning he doesn't actually pay the $1MM for the 10,000 shares - he may only pay 10% (ie, $100,000) in order to control those shares - and since he doesn't actually own 100% of the shares the brokerage is able to play some funny games with the shares, letting someone else sell him those shares without actually having them to sell.

      Or something like that. Basically it's a shell game with three shells and only one pea - and nobody really has the pea under their shell.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    59. Re:The bubble is back! by anothy · · Score: 1

      in this case, "???" is "buy the stock at a much lower price". the trick in the process is that you don't really own the stock you're selling in step one, but you're committing to buy it in step two. so if you've guessed wrong, and the stock goes up, you're out the difference.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    60. Re:The bubble is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain the following that the clowns at the Economist wrote:

      The price of oil has fallen by half in the past two years, to just over $10 a barrel. It may fall further - and the effects will not be as good as you might hope

      I'll let you Google for the details yourself.

    61. Re:The bubble is back! by jorghis · · Score: 1

      Its not really fair to drag something up from that long ago and use it to critize economists. They were speaking with the assumption that economic fundamentals wouldnt change a decade ago, which of course, they have. We had 9/11 which forced the fed to lower rates and they kept them there for too long which caused lots of inflation which caused commodity prices (including oil) to go through the roof. There were a lot of other factors that changed too.

      Economists arent oracles, they cant forsee everything, but they can make rational judgements based on fundamental factors about where things are likely to go. They cant forsee a butterfly flapping its wings in china and somehow changing everything, but those guys are right more often than they are wrong.

      Really, they arent unlike those ex-coaches/nfl players you see on sports shows predicting who is going to win the big game. They are usually right, but every now and then there is an upset and some monday morning quarterback at the watercooler is there to talk about how he saw it coming way before the experts did.

    62. Re:The bubble is back! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      And, amazingly, absolutely nothing gets accomplished besides money changing hands! Reminds me of carbon trading schemes and pollution credits!

      Uh-oh, negative Karma coming in 5, 4, 3...

    63. Re:The bubble is back! by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Yep, you sure can.

    64. Re:The bubble is back! by ClownSoup · · Score: 1

      I'm a married man, and I haven't had a conjugal visit in 6 months.

      You're doing it wrong.

    65. Re:The bubble is back! by AmaranthineNight · · Score: 1

      You aren't getting any either?

  4. This isn't that unusual by neoform · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From what I heard, they had $33 million in capital, strawberries, checkups and BBQs don't use that kind of cash. Over staffing will however. Nothing in this article makes me think they're doing anything over the top like private jet rides to Las Vegas.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:This isn't that unusual by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These perks are fairly cheap, vs. all the other expenses that go on. These type of things probably account for an extra $15 a day per employee That can be made up by improved productivity by the workers less sick days etc... The boom times had this plus paying a basic Web Developer 100k a year, that is without Javascript, Flash, etc. Just doing "HTML" in frontpage.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:This isn't that unusual by aldousd666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      haha, I take it that means you do Javascript then.

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    3. Re:This isn't that unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      am i the only one who fails to see what's wrong with ordered lunches every day? People have to eat anyway, if they don't have to go out hunt for somewhere to eat and stuff it's less time wasted isn't it?

    4. Re:This isn't that unusual by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      No, but they do fly business class. Oooh! Big spenders. ;-)

    5. Re:This isn't that unusual by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes I do and about 2 dozen other "real" computer languages. There is nothing wrong for javascript it is good for solving particular problems that need to be solved most particularly handling UI for a web page. While saving the server the job of handling the data. As the Non-Javascript alternatives would be a plugin based languge, or having the server handle everything on post backs (slow for you, slow for the web server and slow on the database server (having to requery information that it already has gotten).

      HTML is one of the few widely acceptable and easy to use methods for running applications remotely (remote X connections are not common as you need special software installed on windows, and it is not normally easy to setup (for the average user)) Using Javascript with HTML offers better load balancing solution as the Desktop usually has a lot of CPU that is barely utilized while the server is usally running at higher levels.

      Back in the 1990's bubble Web Development was separate from application development for the most part. Today it is becoming more and more integrated and the line between web developer and application developer is far more blurred.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:This isn't that unusual by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

      Ease up there killer, I was just playing around. I just find it amusing to notice how people's own situation affects their opinions, and especially their words. It's only natural that it should work like that, I"m not saying anything you need to be defensive about, unless you like to use slashdot as a job interview ;)

      --
      Speak for yourself.
    7. Re:This isn't that unusual by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I didn't take it as a personal attack. I just don't like the people who think Web Developers are the same job 10 years ago.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:This isn't that unusual by drsquare · · Score: 1

      From what I heard, they had $33 million in capital, strawberries, checkups and BBQs don't use that kind of cash.

      Well, let's assume a punnet of strawberries for $5, dinner for $20, that's $25 a day or $125 a week. Then add in a checkup for $20, BBQ maybe $30 per person (I doubt they're just putting on cheap frozen sausages), drinks $10 per person. Then $10 gym membership, $15 for a massage. That's $200 per employee per week, or $10k per year. With say 500 employees that's $5 million a year on bubble perks.

  5. How Long? by doomicon · · Score: 4, Informative

    " how long will their $25 million VC funding last at this rate?"

    Based on my late 90's Start up runs in NYC, I would say the Doctor and Free Gym Personal Trainer will be gone in two weeks, the food in a month, and 75% of the employees in 3 months.

    Stories like this may even bring PuD back to F**kedcompany postings.

    --

    Awesome!
    1. Re:How Long? by tillerman35 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I worked for a startup company that burned through $40M in six months. It's actually pretty easy to figure out when to jump ship based on the number and quality of perks. When they get rid of the bottled water and put in one of those big coolers with the 20-gallon bottle, it's time to leave. Prior to that, just enjoy the dot-com salary and catered lunches while they last and watch the slow slide into insolvency with quiet amusement.

    2. Re:How Long? by immcintosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When they get rid of the bottled water and put in one of those big coolers with the 20-gallon bottle, it's time to leave.

      Either that, or it's time to be grateful that your company decided not to contribute to one of the most absurdly wasteful excesses of modern society. My workplace is great, but we ditched those water bottles a while ago. I only wish every company would.

  6. If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Kazymyr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From my experience with using Cuil for a few days, it is utterly and completely useless in its present form. Yes it's nice visually, but it's a search engine got heaven's sake - visually pleasant is nothing if the searches don't return anything useful.

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cuil is pretty much living on the lie that it has over 120 billion index pages, which as it turns out after using it a bit seems indeed like complete and utter bullcrap. Without this claim (that their index is 3 times bigger than Google's, yeah right..) they're just another trier with a design some people argue is nice.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I checked out Cuil a few days ago and came to the same conclusion. It sort of works but it's a pretty poor excuse for a search engine at the moment. I'm not sure the unique layout is really very good either. Different isn't always good. Sometimes there's a good reason that everyone does it the same way.

    3. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Major+Blud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man I couldn't agree with you more. I gave it the benefit of a doubt, and tried it for a day. It was complete waste of time. Don't believe me? Do a search on Google of "Slashdot Wikipedia" and then do the same search on Cuil. Google acts as expected...the first link posted is the Wikipedia article about Slashdot. On Cuil, it brings you to a Slashdot article referencing the history of Wikipedia. It proves that just indexing a bazillion pages is useless if you can't effectively *use* those indexes. There's a reason that Google is the #1 search engine...simplicity, speed, and accurate results.

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    4. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by quadrox · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I tried out cuil the first time (first slashdot post) it had lots of problems finding just about anything. But I just tried again today and got pretty much all the results I wanted. Not all of them in the top spot, but the results have improved quite a bit.

      If they keep improving Cuil may well become better than google (in terms of relevant results). Right now it's so-so, but that doesn't mean you should completely dismiss it.

      I for one am looking forward to seing some real competition and new features. I wish them the best of luck.

    5. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Do some obscure searching and you will find alot of bunk. "sherlock holmes' smarter" is one that I used, try it, try your own.
      Very uncuil, so far.

    6. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by GweeDo · · Score: 5, Funny

      search for "lock ness monster"
      Google: images of Nessie, links to wikipedia and other helpful sites
      Cuil: a man pulling on his penis

      So, the moral of the story? Misspell something in google and get relevant data. Do that to Cuil and you get a penis.

    7. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by hobbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe it's not a lie, and they just index all the link farms to which Google give the go-by.

      "Number of web pages indexed" is a completely useless metric on the modern internet.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    8. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by abstract+daddy · · Score: 0

      Cuil needs to stop dicking around!

    9. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      When I tried out cuil the first time (first slashdot post) it had lots of problems finding just about anything. But I just tried again today and got pretty much all the results I wanted. Not all of them in the top spot, but the results have improved quite a bit.

      Very true! I just tried again a few searches I tried the first time and not only it finds more but their reported result count is consistent with how many they display. Maybe that's what I get for e-mailing them about those inconsistencies the previous time.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    10. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not a lie

      Right, so that's not a lie, however if you look for rare keywords on Cuil you'll see a thousand times less results than Google. So they've indexed 120 billion pages but they will only let you search through 40 millions? Hmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    11. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by RpiMatty · · Score: 1

      Why are Google's results correct and Cuil's wrong?
      If I search for Slashdot Wikipedia I would expect a slashdot article about wikipedia. If I search for Wikipedia Slashdot I would expect a wikipedia article about slashdot. Hell if you want to search for a wikipedia article, why dont you just go to wikipedia first?

      Well actually it looks like they changed their search algorithm.
      Google returns some good results from both wikipedia and slashdot. Cuil only returns 369 results, the first being the wiki article about the /. effect, and the rest are unrelated to /.
      Check it out with http://www.cornetdesign.com/googlevscuil.html

      If they return results that don't have anything to do with the first search term, they are pretty useless.

    12. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      They may have indexed 120 billion pages, but as of now, they haven't indexed the _right_ 120 billion pages.

      I once read that Google only indexes a small percentage (like, maybe 5%) of the "visible" web, part of what makes them useful is they hit the interesting 5%. Indexing 15% of the web, but hitting a bunch of uninteresting garbage, isn't very useful.

    13. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Maybe they've indexed 120 billion pages, but only by words appearing in the URL rather than in the content ;)

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    14. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      So, does that make Cuil the "Spore" of search engines?

    15. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Oidhche · · Score: 1

      Not the case for me. The searches I did today gave results just as useless as the ones I did back then.

    16. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Do a search on Google of "Slashdot Wikipedia" and then do the same search on Cuil. Google acts as expected...the first link posted is the Wikipedia article about Slashdot. On Cuil, it brings you to a Slashdot article referencing the history of Wikipedia.

      Actually, to my mind, it's quite the reverse - because Cuil returned a first page that matches the order of your search terms. Keep in mind that Wikipedia can be viewed, in some ways, as the worlds largest link farm.

    17. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      First good thing I've heard about them.

      Punish the Sinners! Misspellers and Deconjugates! Cast out them of poor grammar and low linguistics! Harbor not the 1337, nor the #a>
      Something like that, anyway. (Crap, I broke the "G" key on my laptop!)

      --
      Here's your sig.
    18. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I just tried that, and the first link on Cuil (upper left) is Wikipedia's article on Slashdot. The one next to it is Wikipedia's article the Slashdot effect. So the results seem decent, for the most part.

      But what's up with the images? The image for the Slashdot article is some kind of graph of shades of blue. The one for the Slashdot effect article has a man and young girl holding a flower. WTF?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    19. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Yes it's nice visually

      Yeah, my Quake site looked kind of like that back in 1997 and folks loved it. Only it had yellow headlines and Stroggs. Maybe Cuil needs a few animated Stroggs?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    20. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Mr+Thinly+Sliced · · Score: 1

      For some bizarre reason I typed in "cock ness monster" due to your mention of a penis and was suitably shamed by the results.

    21. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I just now (based on your comment, thank you) looked up "uncyclopedia" on Cuil. It returned a bunch of uncyclopedia articles.

      The third returned article was this:

      Redundancy - Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
      This article and page has been featured and depicted on the front page of Uncyclopedia.. & can vote for or nominate your favourite articles and pages at Uncyclopedia:VFH, the page where you can vote for articles to be displayed and shown on the front page you visit when you first come to Uncyclopedia.. Cream of the...

      uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Redundancy

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    22. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      The first time I used Google, I was impressed with their search results, sure. But what really got my attention was how easy it was to pick out the results I wanted, visually. Lack of clutter, lots of white space, fast loading pages. I was looking at a clean list of stuff.

      Yahoo!, by contrast, was chock full of pictures, advertisements, and "design." Somewhere in there were a few search results. It sucked. Google's clean presentation really made it stand out.

      Cuil has a few innovations. I like the expanding/collapsing "search by category" thing. But I still feel like I'm looking at a magazine index, not a list of search results. They're going to need to really work to convince me that their results are significantly better than Google's.

    23. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by encoderer · · Score: 1

      You're a moron.

      And I'm willing to take a karma hit to say so.

      One data point does not a trend make.

      You really have no clue what you're talking about. Just be honest. You did one query, on the DAY this thing went public, and you're trying to pass off this idea that YOU'RE the true authority on their index size.

      Yes, you're definitely a moron.

    24. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your input. The point of the original comment was that it was extraordinarily unlikely that the total claimed index divided by this one "data point" would result in an integer number, therefore raising the legitimate question of whether or not this number had been inflated by that "2,784" number. Obviously you missed that point.

      By the way, YouTube just called, they want their inflammatory knee-jerk reactions back.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    25. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by toseemod3 · · Score: 1
      They are true masters of ... something.
      They managed to have you as a user

      for a few days

      And this without a service whatsoever. best marketing ever. Only if they had a little something to keep you on that site after they managed to get you there.

    26. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Just to correct you (nothing personal, I'm presuming you appreciate correction where wrong) - it's Loch. The 'ch' is guttural, as if you were pronouncing a German word.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    27. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by BoredAtWorkWhatElse · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the part: So, the moral of the story? Misspell something in google and get relevant data. Do that to Cuil and you get a penis.

    28. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by quadrox · · Score: 1

      While your post may indicate that Cuil has not improved enough to be really usable just yet, a fact I am not disputing, it somewhat misses the point.

      The point with my and the parents post is that the service is improving at all. If it continues to improve it may well become useful and create some competition. I hope it does.

      Google is far from perfect as well. Most searches return fine results, but some topics are so completely spammed with bogus websites its impossible to find anything legit (e.g. game walkthroughs for obscure/old games).

    29. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by encoderer · · Score: 1

      No, I got it.

      I just think it's the biggest joke of a hypothesis I've seen on Slashdot all week. And that's saying something.

      What you're missing is that 2784 isn't prime. In fact, it's not even CLOSE to prime. It's divisible by THREE for chrissakes.

      So take your original numerator: 121,617,892,992

      You divide by your "magic number" and it's an integer. So you jump to the genius conclusion that they're inflating their index by your "magic number" of 2784.

      What happens when we divide 121,617,892,992 by 3?

      It's an integer.

      By 6?

      Integer.

      12?

      Integer.

      24?

      Integer.

      48?

      Integer

      96?

      Yep. Integer.

      I could go on. And on.

      If your magic divisor was a prime number, then that would be SOMEWHAT more interesting.

      As it is? zzzzz

    30. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      So what? The fact is, I find this 2,784 number. From that point of view, how likely is it that the huge number they claim that I look up next is a multiple of that 2,784 number? 1 out of 2,784. Period. I get your point, but it's a matter of point of view.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    31. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH!

    32. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, the moral of the story? Misspell something in google and get relevant data. Do that to Cuil and you get DICK

      There, fixed it for you

    33. Re:If the bubble's back, it will burst soon by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      I did actually, thank you for pointing that out. I hear and see it so often that my mind blanked out the rest of the post.

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
  7. Needs a lot of work by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think there will be a pop.

    Have you tried it? Part of the draw may be the speed and the images next to the search results, but realistically, not really the best results, and the pictures that come up on the results are stock photos - not any relation to the site content at all. (if you have your own domain, search for it and see what I am talking about)

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:Needs a lot of work by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      Next, they will sit some users, tell them it's some "sahara" project, and film them saying "At last good search engine. What, it's still old cuil engine? Wow, looks I was wrong."

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    2. Re:Needs a lot of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just searched my translation website, and it showed a picture next to the result of ANOTHER GUY who has the same name as I do...
      Cuil doesn't seem so intelligent now.

    3. Re:Needs a lot of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I searched for my URL, blog name, and some of the entries that have over 3 dozen extensive comments covering local legal topics. Searching for my name and blog on Google it is 7 of the top 10 results. On Cuil it brought back nothing, zero. So I wonder how they're ranking they're results on their "extensive" index? I did other searches. it seems pretty lame.

    4. Re:Needs a lot of work by twosmokes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so I search for Joe Horn. The first link returned is one for the Texas shooting controversy. The image next to it? A doll of the (former) New Orleans Saints wide receiver.

      Great Job!

    5. Re:Needs a lot of work by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      It needs more than work. It needs a conscience.

      Cuil looks like it wants to serve up results where relevance is a random concept. I searched on my domain name. Surprise! I got hits for posts I made to various forums in *2001*. Nice. And a 404 for the 11th result, from a .de site. Very nice. Not one of the first page of results pointed to the domain website; for instance, searched for somedomain.net, no hits pointing to www.somedomain.net... Pus. No, I don't want to use my real domain name and get ./'d. The fire alarms in the rack would go off in about 4 minutes... Why wake up the neighbors for no good reason?

      Cuil also tends to return results for aggregators, giving you pages of results for link farms, advice/funnel sites, and the usually 'helpful shopping sites' I dread.

      It's clearly not finished yet. But not a bad strategy to first learn to crawl, then to search, and then to organize. I hope they don't run out of money before they get it right, or sell out to something evil, like Apple. Google needs competition. They are now doing evil, like it or not, along with the good. Only a matter time before the 'Google searches YOU!' headlines lead to losing any semblance of privacy or accuracy in your searches. In time, it will be search for cash. You search, they cash in.

      Wait. Already happening. Nevermind. We've lost.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    6. Re:Needs a lot of work by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      if you have your own domain, search for it and see what I am talking about

      I typed in 'piping design' (without the quotes) and on the first Cuil results page, 5 of the 11 results returned were for sites I own and operate. They missed the new dot org site though. :(

      This is an EXCELLENT search engine!

      Do I get a +Funny or +Scumbag Shill for this comment?

  8. well by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    the only reason any of that matters - is because right now their search doesn't work. if it did work better than google, people wouldn't care what they did with their money. but it doesn't - and so cuil is doomed to become a joke, or reference to failure. And it's not like this wasn't obvious right from the start.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  9. Seriously? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it were former HotBot engineers that were doing this would this be such a big deal? Probably not.. It's the Google association that is generating all the media. IMHO, Cuil is having it's 15 minutes.

    It does make you wonder though if the Google lovefest is over. Now that they are a publicly traded company their only obligation is to their shareholders and as a publicly traded company they should probably change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else".

    Makes you wonder if all the attention to Cuil just brings up the fact that maybe people are starting to turn on Google and why not? Maybe they're getting TOO much power. With that being said, more power to Cuil.

    1. Re:Seriously? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Google, as a publicly traded company, has obligations to three people. The stock is structured such that Sergei, Larry and Eric have complete control over every single shareholder vote.

      Sure, they have to toe the line and generally act in the interests of other shareholders for publicity reasons, but they aren't beholden to other people when it comes to setting the mission of the company, or electing the board, or whatever.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Seriously? by cowscows · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that people are turning on Google as much as Google has just stopped being all that interesting. Many people are of the opinion that their search has become increasingly less useful as of late as the spammers have become better at gaming their ranking system. But even if that's not actually true, at the end of the day, it's primarily just a search engine, which is important, but not particularly glamorous.

      People still use it, but it's not like it's a fun game or something, it's just a tool. And once it becomes familiar and part of your routine, it's hard to get excited about it. Google has done a pretty good job of at least keeping their brand exciting by releasing their take on other things (maps, mail, etc.) and their IPO and the huge piles of money kept them in the news. But there hasn't been anything really interesting as of late.

      Not that there's anything wrong with that. But it shouldn't be a surprise if the media starts pushing other headlines. Because that's what the media does, and if there's no good headlines out there, they'll make one out of something insignificant.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    3. Re:Seriously? by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Google, as a publicly traded company, has obligations to three people. The stock is structured such that Sergei, Larry and Eric have complete control over every single shareholder vote.

      That may be the case, but Google is still beholden to maximise shareholder value for every shareholder. Sergei, Larry and Eric can't vote to change the law in that respect.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    4. Re:Seriously? by Pontiac · · Score: 1

      People arn't turning on google because they are starting to act corporate..
      It's because the search results are turning to crap. They feel that Google is focusing on other projects and letting search slip.. I love google maps, Gmail and Sketchup.. Adwords is a necessary evil to fuel the beast..

      I turned to google back when they started because they gave the best results..
      Hotbot, Lyco, Yahoo and the others were barfing up banner ads and garbage results..
      Google gave me the answers I was looking for..

      These days I still get the answer but sometimes I have to wade through pages of garbage results that only redriect to some useless retail site or worse..

      The only way Cuil will survive is to crank out good results. I could care less that they have a bigger index if it's all junk results. I remember back when google started up Lycos was always talking up their huge index.. where are they today?

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    5. Re:Seriously? by DohnJoe · · Score: 1

      perhaps they should change their motto to: 'The shareholders made us do it.'

    6. Re:Seriously? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      I don't know about google love fest but as long as they have the best search engine I will use them.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:Seriously? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      HotBot was great until Google started to return relevant results. The Hotbot and the others started a viscous death spiral with less users they needed more ads to make up the revenue. More ads resulted in less users. I'll admit I was one o the last to finally admit Google's superiority. HotBot was so much better for a while. I never understood the initial migration to google. Maybe the interface? The cool name?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    8. Re:Seriously? by Arccot · · Score: 1

      It does make you wonder though if the Google lovefest is over. Now that they are a publicly traded company their only obligation is to their shareholders and as a publicly traded company they should probably change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else".

      If they do less evil than everyone else, it's still a step in the right direction. I'm not saying they do, but any company that honestly tries to do right by the environment, community, and world is a good thing.

    9. Re:Seriously? by deanlandolt · · Score: 1

      It does make you wonder though if the Google lovefest is over. Now that they are a publicly traded company their only obligation is to their shareholders and as a publicly traded company they should probably change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else".

      I hear you, and they're certainly rubbing me the wrong way these days too, but to be fair, it has absolutely nothing to do with their IPO. Larry and Sergey did something unique and remarkable when they "sold out" -- they ensured that no voting rights conveyed with their publicly traded common stock. Thus, Google, unlike the rest of our corporate overlords, is decidedly _not_ beholden to driveling short-sighted daytraders nor dbag raiders like Carl Icahn.

  10. How many employees do they have? by gravyface · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It sounds expensive, but if there's 10 employees, that VC funding could last years.

    Google set a precedent for perks, so it's only natural that companies are going to try to repeat that success for recruiting purposes alone.

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:How many employees do they have? by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      They have circa 30 employees. I'm not convinced about the grave seriousness of these perks. It could be one of the costs of employment of ex-Google staff.

    2. Re:How many employees do they have? by entmike · · Score: 1

      Your signature is oddly appropriate. :)

  11. Is this unusual? by PackMan97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are a ton of companies out there that offer free snackies, gyms, on-site doctors, etc. For the most part they are prudent financial decisions. free snacks: the cost is VERY minimal compared to the good will generated and assuming it's stocked internally, you don't have to allow an outside vendor in to stock machines improving your security. gyms: healthy employees cost less to insure. healthy employees miss less work. healthy employees are more attractive and will lead to improved workplace chemistry. healthy employees impress customers. on-site doc: employees only need to take 30m off work to see the doc instead of having to get in a car, drive to their doc, wait, wait, wait, see doc, drive back to work which is 2 hrs minimum. so, while a lot of these really seem excessive, they aren't.

    1. Re:Is this unusual? by Inda · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not unusual, no. Mine you, I've only been working in this company 10 years...

      Lunch is ordered in every single day.

      We have a subsidised restaurant and sandwich bar. The coffee bars take the piss out of Starbucks.

      Huge fridges burst with snacks and drinks.

      Free coffee and soft drinks from machines in each corner of each floor in each building.

      Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area.

      Um, stale sandwiches and fruit left over from long meetings..?

      The company pays for a personal trainer and gym membership for everyone.

      Fully stocked gym, several trainers, but only one working at a time, one physiotherapist. Open 24/7. Treatment room looks well equipped although I've never needed to used it.

      A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbeque, to see if everyone's in good health.

      Doctor is in his office 5 times a week. Two nurses are always there.

      Employees drift in an out at times that suit themselves.

      90% of us are on personal contracts. I'm supposed to do 37 hours a week, I'll only do 35 this week though as I want to go home early on Friday. Do my work and everyone's happy. We refuse to talk about people being 30 minutes late in the mornings - it's not productive. If anything, we'll complain when others are coming in at 8am and not going home until 8pm. People working long hours is not productive, it creates a bad atmosphere, if there's work for two people, employ a second person.

      This is a massive company in the UK. My site alone employs 2,000 people.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Is this unusual? by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      I was about to say the same thing. The company that I am currently employed for has many similar perks. This is not news.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    3. Re:Is this unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like what you have to say and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    4. Re:Is this unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true. These little things can mean improved productivity. When I was at a startup there were people I know who would prefer to stay in and work while having the free Ramen noodles in the breakroom for lunch. The company provided free dinner, but then that made people stay late nights and get more work done. Provide Saturday lunch in the expectation that people come to work on Saturday, which quite a few of us did. These things are productivity measures.

      These things can be viewed as an investment in the workforce. The intention is good here. As long as the execs do not blow it all off on some private jet rides they should be fine. Also the biggest monthly expense for any company is always the payroll.

    5. Re:Is this unusual? by weicco · · Score: 1

      We have... We have... Well, let's see. We have ... tea ... coffee. Yes! Occasionally we have buns with raisins but only if we buy them ourselves.

      Blah. How can I get UK citizenship? :(

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    6. Re:Is this unusual? by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      If you didn't clarify this was UK, I could swear this was Yahoo! in Sunnyvale. Except for the 24 hour gym part - it's open 24/7, but they turn off the sauna after the personal trainers leave.

    7. Re:Is this unusual? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      If anything, we'll complain when others are coming in at 8am and not going home until 8pm.

      I DO know some people that work long hours like this and actually are productive, but in my experience, those that work those long hours are very often in it for the overtime (clock-watching) or "have nothing better to do" (prefer work life to home life, bitch to the family and co-workers about having to have to work so hard).

      Some guys I've seen show up at 4:30AM and make sure they send emails near that time so others can marvel at how dedicated they are. Doing this gives them a leg up on everyone else, as they've been bored for hours doing essentially nothing and jump on the eight-o'clockers first thing in the morning with demands and requests.

      Pretty amusing, until one of these people start burning up the time of people who actually, like, do stuff during their day.

  12. ..and? by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Single post, now retracted on someone's blog.
    Plus, how much does a bowl of strawberries cost?
    Buy lunch in? Perhaps it works out cheaper than maintaining a kitchen and staff. This is a non-story.

    The cynic in me also thinks that maybe Cuil want people to think they're young, confident and worth investing in.
    Their search engine seems pretty average at best from what I've seen so far, yet strangely they're getting lots of media coverage. Is this "story" part of that?

    1. Re:..and? by Applekid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus, how much does a bowl of strawberries cost?

      The strawberries are cheap. The 12 female naked virgins that serve them to you body-shot style are what costs.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:..and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The strawberries are cheap. The 12 female naked virgins that serve them to you body-shot style are what costs.

      And the turnover is the real killer.

    3. Re:..and? by CarlDenny · · Score: 1

      That'll teach me to RTFA.

      No point in doing it now I guess.

  13. I figured out their business plan: by MMC+Monster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be on the front page of /. every week, boosting their add impressions.

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:I figured out their business plan: by Veamon · · Score: 0

      But what about their AD impressions?

      --

      Slashdot News: As serious as a busted rubber
    2. Re:I figured out their business plan: by Otter · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, they've done a terrific job of getting themselves free publicity. Unfortunately, it seems like they've done it at least a year too early and are only attracting lots of attention to a not-really-useful site. (What used to be known as "Good advertising kills a bad product" and is now referred to as "Remember Marimba?"

    3. Re:I figured out their business plan: by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These startups are notorious for their vague business plans. They don't take the time to do the math. They just kind of give their impressions of how they think their revenue will add up. Sheesh!

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    4. Re:I figured out their business plan: by anilg · · Score: 1

      I have an interesting theory on this publicity they've been getting. I've read far too many reports of opposite pictures being shown, to think it is some bad algorithm.

      I think the wrong picture association is deliberate, to generate publicity in the form of blog posts, word of mouth and /. articles. And holy heck its working! If it is so: well played, cuil marketing, well played!

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
  14. Different headline by radarjd · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps the headline should be "Cuil Proves that VCs are Still Vulnerable to Hype"?

  15. Doctor, I feel fat! by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    You eat too many muffins!!!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  16. Good idea, bad idea by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    good idea: new search engine

    bad idea: search engine is called "cool" but they don't have cool.com.

    good idea: free strawberries, etc. around the office.

    bad idea: employees can come and go whenever they feel like it.

    Good idea: 25 million in VC money.

    Bad idea: spending most of your VC money on something other than the product that got you the VC money (i.e. strawberries, etc).

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Good idea, bad idea by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was pronounced like the word Cull (Kuhl). Which is defined as a verb as such 1. to choose; select; pick. 2. to gather the choice things or parts from. 3. to collect; gather; pluck. (Dictionary.com)

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    2. Re:Good idea, bad idea by achacha · · Score: 1

      Shhh... you are giving their marketing people ideas!

    3. Re:Good idea, bad idea by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Funny. Cull.com would have been a much better name, and probably not all too expensive to buy off of the squatter that almost certainly owns it.

      Of course, then we would have had the crappy results and astoundingly bad layout of Cuil on top of an otherwise good name.

      Right now, they're 100% bad. Maybe it's for the best.

    4. Re:Good idea, bad idea by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was pronounced like the word Cull (Kuhl). Which is defined as a verb as such 1. to choose; select; pick. 2. to gather the choice things or parts from. 3. to collect; gather; pluck. (Dictionary.com)

      That would make sense. No. They want it pronounced "cool," but they probably say that word "kewel." In any case, it doesn't mean "cool," and looks more like it should be pronounced like "quill."

      --
      Here's your sig.
    5. Re:Good idea, bad idea by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      It is pronounced "quill", and it isn't Irish for "knowledge" either. Good job there, guys. Maybe if your search engine could, oh, find an Irish/English dictionary...

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Good idea, bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea: Take some of that VC money and hire someone to come up with a better name.

      Nobody cares that your founder is Irish and "cuil" has some special meaning to him. It's a stupid name. Worse than "flooz" IMO

    7. Re:Good idea, bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad idea: employees can come and go whenever they feel like it.

      Why? The only restriction you need is to have some overlap with other employees and be there for any meetings. My experience with flexible office hours had no problems associated with that policy, and plenty of benefits. There'd have to be something pretty amazing about a job for me to consider taking it if it didn't allow flexible schedule - either that, or I'd have to be very desperate.

    8. Re:Good idea, bad idea by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      Now that's a good link. I'd give you my last mod point if I could.

      --
      Here's your sig.
  17. Carrot and Stick by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only carrot I have ever seen is a paycheck, everything else is a stick.

    1. Re:Carrot and Stick by MistrBlank · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least you see the stick, where I work, they give me the stick, it's just in a place I can't see it.

    2. Re:Carrot and Stick by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I feel sorry for someone with such an unrewarding job. You get no pride of accomplishment, or doing a job you enjoy doing, or satisfaction of a job well done, or anything? That's just sad. There's more to life than money.

      I just now ran across someone's sig in this very topic: "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Carrot and Stick by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side: At least they're not whacking you with the stick and calling it "spanking."

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:Carrot and Stick by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's the only "Certificate of Appreciation" that really matters.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Carrot and Stick by Buzz_Light · · Score: 1

      Stick up your ass? Boss, is that you?!

    6. Re:Carrot and Stick by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1

      Your lucky, I had to buy my own motivational stick to get stuff done: Motivational Stick

      --
      If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
    7. Re:Carrot and Stick by drsquare · · Score: 1

      There's more to life than money.

      Maybe, but those other things don't pay the bills. There's no point in having a rewarding job (if those even exist) if your house is reposessed.

      Unless there's a sense of accomplishment in living paycheque to paycheque, having debt collectors coming round, only being able to eat cheap nasty food, living in a tiny one-room apartment, and not being able to afford any forms of entertainment. I think I'd rather have the money.

    8. Re:Carrot and Stick by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      You completely missed my point. It isn't an either/or proposition, that you can have a rewarding job OR pay the bills. It's possible to have a rewarding job that DOES pay the bills.

      What's the difference between a job and a wife? After ten years the job still sucks.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:Carrot and Stick by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's possible to have a rewarding job that DOES pay the bills.

      Maybe, but such a thing is incredibly rare. Most jobs are unrewarding and barely pay the bills as it is.

  18. Whatever. by MrMacman2u · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cuil Sucks. Seriously, it sucks real hard.

    I liked their privacy policy and thought their approach to searh results was unique and fresh, it just needed a bit of getting used to.

    So, I have tried using it in place of Google since it was announced.

    I gave up today in shear frustration.

    Take me home Google! I missed you so!

    --
    This signature is lame.
    1. Re:Whatever. by hobbit · · Score: 2, Funny

      I gave up today in shear frustration.

      That might be what your problem is: it's not supposed to be yielding wool.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    2. Re:Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe their "search" results will satisy your needs more than their "searh" results?

    3. Re:Whatever. by RayMarron · · Score: 1

      I agree that it needs some work. I tried it this morning, and it failed on my first search. I typed "hosts file" and it came up with NO results, not even the wiki entry! Later, I ended up just trying "hosts", and it brought up results, including a set of tabs with more specific subjects which included... wait for it... hosts file.

      Duh.

      --
      ON DELETE CASCADE
    4. Re:Whatever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up today in shear frustration.

      Were you trying to find somewhere to buy shears using Cuil?

  19. Cuil? No. True Knowledge? Yes! by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not sure if there is bubble but one thing I did learn about during the Cuil-crash-and-burn-at-launch fiasco was a new search technology out of Cambridge that is in beta right now. It is named true knowledge, and uses natural language strings for search, and wiki style user submitted knowledge base in conjunction with a standard search engine. It is pretty neat and promising search technology that I found searching after looking that the shorcomings of Cuil. I highly recommend getting a beta account at true knowledge if you are interested in improving search results in a fine grained approach.

    1. Re:Cuil? No. True Knowledge? Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A search engine I need to log into. Um, yeah. Get back to me when it's more Anonymous Coward-friendly.

    2. Re:Cuil? No. True Knowledge? Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks interesting, but only for english speakers. My searches are usually not in english. Cuil also didn't work at all. I have tried several others too, but don't see any coming close to google. Monopoly is one thing, but their search really works, especially with the advanced features, reg.expressions, site search etc.

    3. Re:Cuil? No. True Knowledge? Yes! by locobox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link... This truly IS the next wave in search/query technologies. I applied, hopefully I'll get an invite soon!

    4. Re:Cuil? No. True Knowledge? Yes! by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I think this is Cambridge the town, not the university. Looks interesting, but it's just one among many who are attempting to get natural language searches going - Powerset being one of the others.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  20. Where did this come from? by Tabernaque86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have never heard of Cuil until this article. I'm a little impressed with the depth of their search, as I did a quick test of searching for old screen names and found some old stuff, and some unexpected stuff (like being mentioned outside of the site I registered for).

    However, their results display screen sucks ass. Their 4x3 grid is annoying, especially given the size of each result. Clicking on Preferences completely failed to correct this. I was hoping for "Grid view" vs "List view", but I guess a list view would be too much like Google and completely unacceptable.

    Until it fixes this, and adds a conversion calculator, I see no reason to switch to the new kids on the block.

    1. Re:Where did this come from? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      So your gripe is that Cuil isn't Google?

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    2. Re:Where did this come from? by Tabernaque86 · · Score: 1

      No, my gripe is that it is presented in a way that is neither easy nor pleasing to read. It just so happens that Google does that.

  21. The Bubble HAS Burst. by imstanny · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...for financial institutions. I work at a Financial Firm in NYC, and we don't even have coffee makers in the kitchen! And they took away the vending machine. Bottled water has gone up from $12 for 2 cases to $16. I've been reduced to filling up my bottles at the sink, and shorting Google. If you're a Shadenfreude, you've enjoyed this post.

    1. Re:The Bubble HAS Burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you're a Shadenfreude, you've enjoyed this post.

      off topic, but you can't be a Schadenfreude, you can only experience or have Schadenfreude. Then again, you spelled it 'Shadenfreude' so maybe the two are not the same thing ... ?

    2. Re:The Bubble HAS Burst. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      off topic, but you can't be a Schadenfreude, you can only experience or have Schadenfreude

      So if you claim to be a Schadenfreude, does that make you a Schadenfraud?

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:The Bubble HAS Burst. by unfasten · · Score: 1

      ...And they took away the vending machine...

      Why would they take away the vending machine? Wouldn't that have a chance of making money, or did people stop buying enough to make it worthwhile?

    4. Re:The Bubble HAS Burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I started working at a financial company less than 6 months ago. I was surprised at the subsidized Pepsi (40 cents a can, compared to a full dollar at the public university vending machines) and more recently, the coffee makers.

      The floor is a big cubicle farm and has two kitchens, 1 fridge and a small tv area where the 12 o'clock people watch news, sports or random cable things.

      It isn't something everyone uses, but looking BACK at my old job, I wouldn't want to go back to their lack of kitchen-and-living-room perks. Dad has told me there's gyms at his large industrial bank, and lots of other things. I have to admit that it is easy for these perks to be cut when a successful company goes the way of Bear-Sterns, but nobody likes to think their environment will be cut back, ever again. Unless you become your own boss

  22. Rest Area? by CR0WTR0B0T · · Score: 1

    Who calls a break room a rest area? The only thing at our rest area is bad coffee and stale donuts provided by the local VFW.

    --
    "Nothing to see here. Move along."
  23. Uh... where are the revenue streams? by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Maybe I missed it somewhere but, how exactly is CUIL going to make money? There aren't any ads on the search pages and, last I checked, I wasn't billed for pressing that search button. Sounds to me like someone had a Cuil idea (see what I did there) and was charismatic enough to convince VCs to pour money into a business that doesn't have a plan to make money. Either their plan was to blow through as much VC money as possible and have a blast doing it or they've got an ingenious plan to steal ad revenue from Google (good luck boys).

    --
    ~Syberz
    1. Re:Uh... where are the revenue streams? by beluv · · Score: 0

      The only thing I noticed is what appears to be a sponsored link at the top of the suggested searches drop down which displays as you're typing in your search terms.

  24. Cuil's fate by beluv · · Score: 1, Funny

    Google will acquire them within a year... unless Microsoft beats them to it.

    1. Re:Cuil's fate by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'll need to. I expect history to claim them first.

      --
      Here's your sig.
  25. Not for long by Alkonaut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Regardless of the cost of any perks they may enjoy there, a search engine company needs to have a search engine to live. To me, cuil appears to be a quick hack without the huge index it claims, and without a decent ranking algorithm.

    As an example, I did a search for my home town (a really tiny place, 1000 people or so). The top 10 google results included the towns unofficial homepage, a googlemap centered on the town, the wikipedia article for the town, a couple of weather sites with forecasts for the town and so on. All relevant, none repeated.

    The first page of cuil displayed *seven* "find hotels in $town" (believe me, there are no hotels) or "find single women in $town" (same story there...). A lot of these spam sites were even repeated five or six times among the first results. A japaneese version of a result was listed higher than the english version of the same result, and so on.

    1. Re:Not for long by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      As an example, I did a search for my home town

      Note the difference capitalization makes:

      All lower case: No results were found for: groton massachusetts

      And;

      Properly capitalized: 7,947 results for Groton, Massachusetts

      There are apparently some bugs in the strawberries.

    2. Re:Not for long by Alkonaut · · Score: 1

      That's weird (can't believe they have store casing in their index?) Anyway, no difference to my example, although for some reason the crappy irrelevant results are in a different order...

  26. Free Lunches and stuff by KillerEggRoll · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just left a company (unfortunately) that had lunch catered daily, stocked drinks, had a heavily-used foosball table, and (un)officially had flex time among many other benefits. This company happens to be a market leader with no debt and VERY profitable revenue stream.

    The company was fortunate to have certain events happen at opportune times, but the benefits were needed to lure a skilled workforce into joining the team. Cuil will probably fall flat, but the "excesses" are warranted IMO.

    :-( If I didn't have to relocate, I would never have left.

  27. Not for long... by Wiarumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are enjoying their perks.. sure... but meanwhile their resumes are probably already submitted to other companies. These guys are either the most optimistic crew in the world (to be confidently contesting Google with a subpar engine) or they are just enjoying their time while it lasts.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  28. Too bad their search engine sucks... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Too bad their search engine sucks... I searched for: homepage, and my homepage wasn't in the results. Contrast that with Google, where my homepage is the #1 hit.

    1. Re:Too bad their search engine sucks... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Actually, I just searched for aardwolf on google.com and your homepage was the 23rd or so hit. Mind you, it wasn't in the first 10 pages of results on cuil.com.

      On the other hand, it's well known that part of google's algorithm depends on how well linked-to a page is, and yours is linked from every slashdot comment you make. That may well inflate your position in google's results.

    2. Re:Too bad their search engine sucks... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about using my real name. My homepage isn't "aardwolf's homepage". :-)

    3. Re:Too bad their search engine sucks... by Atti+K. · · Score: 1
      I guess you meant "I searched for my homepage".
      But it gave me and idea for an experiment: search for the word "homepage".
      Google, the first 10: BBC, iGoogle (hehe), CNN, Wikipedia entry for "homepage", Opera, Microsoft, NASA, MPlayer (nice! :D), Ubuntu (thought so...) and Symantec.

      Same query on Cuil: none of the above. Something NASA/ESA, Uni of Oxford, WWE (wtf?), PhpWiki, GnuPlot...

      There's much room for improvement...

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    4. Re:Too bad their search engine sucks... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... oops. :-)

  29. Pretty face, ugly results. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tried cuil this morning. Completely useless results. It won't matter if they are run by dot com fools of the most brilliant business minds today. If the product sucks (and in it's present form it does) it won't last long.

  30. cuil is lame by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    they put these stupid little images next to search results which have no relation to the result.

    my site is a gaming editorial site at the moment, and they put a stupid little picture of some little kids running on the beach next to it.

    WTF?

    cuil is not.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  31. They'll be gone within 2 years by wtfispcloadletter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've tried their "search" engine. I can get better and faster results from a printed telephone book. They may be made up of intelligent, educated people, but they need to get someone with brains on board to perform a complete rewrite of their search algorithms ASAP. I don't see their VC investors being too happy right now and in the near future they're going to be pissed.

    I'd like to see some stats to see if they are even getting any traffic now that people have seen how worthless their search results are.

    1. Re:They'll be gone within 2 years by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I tried using their search engine to find tours for a possible vacation to the Philippines. All but one of the results on the first page were for "vacation escort" services.

      Silly me, I was trying to find a tour of the Puerto Princesa underground river.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  32. How long will it last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long will the $25M$ VC funding last?

    One kilo of strawberries is, for the sake of ease, around 50 strawberries. The cost of one kilo of strawberries around here is $10.

    Fifty employees will probably eat around 4 strawberries a day measured over any prolonged period. Let us say 25% of the strawberries go bad and get tossed out. So we need 250 strawberries a day, or around $50.

    With $25M, they will last in excess of 1300 years if they had no other expenses and no income.

    I have really stacked the cards in Cuils disfavour here. Perks like these are trivially cheap. The only people who complain about stuff like this are idiots or coinpushers who can't see any benefits of spending money.

    For the record: I work in a consultancy company. We have free coffee and fruit, heavily subsidized lunch, someone comes in to give massages every friday if we want them, there is a playstation or something in the offices, and our gym passes are subsidized as far as my employer can without me getting hit with more taxes. We buy whatever techie books we want, and the company pays. We regularly go out and eat together - around four times a year.

    This company has not fired anyone the last ten years.

    Perks does not mean a nonperforming business. A bad bottom line does. This is not the same thing.

    1. Re:How long will it last? by amccaf1 · · Score: 1

      One kilo of strawberries is, for the sake of ease, around 50 strawberries. The cost of one kilo of strawberries around here is $10.

      Fifty employees will probably eat around 4 strawberries a day measured over any prolonged period. Let us say 25% of the strawberries go bad and get tossed out. So we need 250 strawberries a day, or around $50.

      Captain Queeg, is that you?

      --
      "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
  33. Sure it does by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course it means something. It's attitude. The company is badly run because the management sees fit to waste tons of money before a single nickel is generated. It's bad management, plain and simple. The VC's, if they were smart, should be outraged.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  34. Cuil is a good porn-search engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It even finds pron for you when you don't want it!

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/29/cuil_launch/

  35. Re: get it right: CBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You eat too many biscuits."

    Fixed that for you. It's called Chronic Biscuit Toxicity.

  36. Perks != Bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now keep in mind I've never worked for one of these uber-perks companies, I haven't had the benefit of living in Silicon valley, but I don't believe that perks and a relaxed work environment are indicative of some kind of "bubble bursting" danger.

    Why is it so many companies (especially US software companies IMO) think that the only way to beat the competition is to work 80 hour weeks in a gray cubicle farm? The majority of my employers have been like this, even the startups, and guess what, they have plenty of their own inefficiency problems. I find myself thinking "I could work like 20 hours a week and get more accomplished than they do in 60 with all the BS going on here."

    Anyway it's not the work environment that caused the bubble collapse. It was all the VCs who were filled with non-technical people suddenly enthralled with the magical new technology (OMG Internetz!) and somehow thought the consumer had gotten just as excited about it as they had. These people invested millions of dollars in funding on companies with ideas like "Shop for groceries online!" They actually thought the general public was going to jump on that? I mean come on.

    So I will take these "OMG new bubble!" posts to heart when I finally hear something ridiculous like that going on again. But I suspect most of the investors got burned so badly last time that maybe they're a bit more conservative now. Risks are fine (new search engines, etc.) as long as they have a sound concept behind them.

  37. how long will their $25 million VC funding last by thc4k · · Score: 1

    With every slashdot article they will last longer. Just let them die...

  38. I don't get it? by stankulp · · Score: 1

    I tried Cuil, and it seems awfully lame to me.

    I didn't get any results I was looking for, all I got was a bunch of links to companies that were obliquely related to my search.

    Cuil is an advertisement delivery platform.

    --
    We must be alert to the danger that public policy could become captive to a scientific-technological elite. - Eisenhower
  39. cuil: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    challenge google on its data retention and privacy policies and atttitude in foreign countries by contrasting sharply with them

    go zero retention, max privacy, and tell beijing "fuck you" on its authoritarian dictates

    in the meantime, with google's court efforts saying we don't really have privacy, and saying "i bend over" to beijing, the rewards you reap will be spectacular:

    1. you will earn tons of free advertising and pr in the press
    2. all us zealots here at slashdot will switch allegiance to you
    3. the average joe will gradually realize the issues and the benefits

    then we will all do the unthinkable: we will slay google

    regards and good luck

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:cuil: by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      yes, even less evil than google.

      That's a pretty good slogan for cuil actually.

  40. The failed on the most common search... free porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cuil.com/search?q=free%20porn&sl=long

    You will find http://124.freejoin0302.nvvam.org/ as the #4 site, yesterday it was #2... it is definitely not free porn.
    If you fail on the free porn search... I don't have much hope for anything else.

  41. Yawn by mprindle · · Score: 1

    I am very underwhelmed by cuil. Most basic searches say they have a ton of results, but if you start to look there are duplicates from page to page.

  42. They use last year's data by benwiggy · · Score: 1

    Searching for terms, which on Google bring up my current website, on Cuil they produce results which point to pages on a different URL that I stopped using a year ago.
    That's the kind of cutting edge firm I want to work for!

    1. Re:They use last year's data by thedistrict · · Score: 1

      They just can't compete with Google. They are a giant and a near monopoly in the search business.

  43. You can't stop bubbles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Debt is exponential.

  44. Searched my domain.... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Results not found. Searched a word in my domain quite common in Japanese.

    From Cuil
    7,735 results for yubi

    From google
    Results 395,000 for yubi

    I've used Google since snap.com went the way of the dodo.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  45. Cuil by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

    Cuil has now been on slashdot twice, but it's also been in the NYT and on CNN, so the mainstream media has picked this up. The general consensus on /. seems to be that Cuil is not that great of a search engine. I tend to agree with this sentiment (I can't find anything useful in my searches). However, my inclination is that /.ers may search for things that the rest of the world would never. Is it possible that Cuil's search engine is better at finding useful sites for searches like "best food for puppies", and not so good at "gentoo install man"?

    Yes, I know, a real /.er would never have to search for the gentoo install man. I apologize for my insolence.

  46. I found a bug by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

    2 days ago, I found a bug in cuil. You couldn't search for anything if you put a period (.) in the front of a word. For example, searching for ".NET" has 0 results(>5 billion results on google). I sent this to their feedback e-mail, and hadn't heard anything out of it. Testing it now, it seems they fixed the problem. I'm impressed with their agility.

  47. Yuil was proof that Cuil is a joke by lscotte · · Score: 1

    If this is the bubble, it's pretty weak, when you consider that Yuil was hacked together in a day and provides basically the same thing as Cuil from a front-end perspective (and the last thing we need is yet another crawler)... It took Cuil a year? Oh, guess they have a lot of investor's money to burn.

    --
    This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  48. Culi by Atin · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's important to note that while Cuil is a search engine, Culi [NSFW] is, well, not.

  49. Not long by mphall21 · · Score: 1

    The world is heading for a worldwide economy, that means that we have to start working harder and more efficiently to compete with foreign companies. People need to realize that this is where we are going, for better or for worse.

  50. Who's going to admit they've cuiled themselves?! by ursuspacificus · · Score: 1

    *crickets* OK, I will. My website is http://www.ursuspacificus.net/blog/ I could find no search results pointing to my website on Cuil. Nor could I find any results indicating any websites out there in the series of tubes link to my site. Tried with quotes and without... Tried lopping off the path. Tried lopping off the protocol spec. Tried lopping off the "www" and the TLD. Nothing. All I got was a bunch of links to dating sites which have apparently scraped my profile from sites I'm actually on. WTF? Long lost friends have found me by googling me. I know my website has some visibility by googling myself. Having cuiled myself, I'm left wondering whether my website is even up at all! ...wait... there it is. And how does one *pronounce* "cuil", anyway?! I tend to think it's homonymous with "soil"

  51. The proof is not the perks... by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...the proof is that they launched the site without anyone noticing that it basically doesn't work.

    Just one example, from a half-an-hour spent playing with it trying to find something, anything it did better than Google. There is a humongous auto dealership in the Pacific Northwest named Lithia Motors, so big it's listed on the NYSE, stock symbol LAD. If you do a Cuil search on Lithia Motors, the hits that come up on the first page include a Wikipedia article about Lithia Motors, a Reuters report, a news item about its expansion in Iowa, its rank among America's Most Admired companies... every darned thing.

    Every darn thing except: the website for Lithia Motors.

    Just guessing at the URL and typing "lithia" into the browser's address field works better than using Cuil.

    Shades of the bad old days when MBAs called the shots and didn't bother their pretty little heads over product details. Who cared about the product itself, when all that mattered was the pitch?

    I can just imagine the pitch for Cuil. Imagine a search engine that indexes more than Google, works better than Google, and is staffed by top-notch Google expatriates.

    What I can't imagine is why they unveiled it before it was working. "You only have one chance to make a first impression." They've managed to garner so much publicity that almost anyone potentially interested in it has given it a try... and the first impressions and word-of-mouth are so bad that IMHO if they ever do get it working, their only chance will be to relaunch under a different name.

    1. Re:The proof is not the perks... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      What I can't imagine is why they unveiled it before it was working.

      I'd guess it's because they depend on user input for their ranking algorithm. They need their users to provide relevance feedback... so it's a bit of a problem. Without those initial users, they will _NEVER_ get their search engine to work properly.

      Just my guess...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:The proof is not the perks... by strimpster · · Score: 1

      Two things. First in regards to your statement about not having the website. Go back and type in your search term again. You might notice the AJAX search terms popping up with a website as the first that will take you directly to the site. I think that they are testing something to see if that is more valuable when trying to go to a company's website.

      Two, I think that everyone is missing the real point of what they are trying to do. They came out saying that they had more indexed pages just to get publicity. The real new thing added to the search arena is that they are analyzing the content of the site to get the context of the terms on each site. If you put in a really generic topic, you will get all content on the page, however there is more ways of looking at the content via the grey bar at the top (under the search box). They have the search results sorted by context to help to refine your results. This is something that Google does not currently do and I believe this company is trying to be the next thing that Google purchases to add into their search results. I think that it is a pretty good concept to test out because the other search engines can't really get context of content.

    3. Re:The proof is not the perks... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      I think the "site content analysis" is bogus, too.

      The Lithia Motors search presents to images, so just for the heck of it I tried "Norwood Boch," which I think ought to get me to the website of another huge car dealer. Not only does Cuil not pick up the actual dealer website, but the second result is, of all things, a Wikipedia "articles for deletion" discussion... dated 2005... about a biography of the founder of the dealership. With a link that gives a 404 Not Found. But that's not the point.

      Accompanying that descripton is, of all things, a picture of a runner in a road race. And, no, no, no, it is not a picture of Ernie Boch, Sr. or Jr.

      It also has a link to a current Wikipedia article on Ernie Boch, Jr. The Wikipedia article contains no images. But Cuil accompanies the description with an image of, apparently, two men wearing Mickey Mouse hats and a person in an orca suit. I don't think either of them is Ernie Boch, Jr.--it's hard to tell since Cuil gives me no way to determine the origin of Cuil's image. Given that a Google image search turns up literally dozens of nice, straightforward publicity stills of Ernie Boch, Jr, I'd have to say that Cuil's so-called content analysis--must truly suck.

  52. Old miser here. by bytesex · · Score: 1

    barbeque is spelled 'barbecue'.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Old miser here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMGBBQ?

    2. Re:Old miser here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give 'em a break, they're located in California. They probably don't know what real barbecue even looks like.

    3. Re:Old miser here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF

  53. Here's how I do it. by bytesex · · Score: 1

    I always test search engines by issuing a 'tits' query. There should be some birds among the results.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Here's how I do it. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Last heard before being ejected from the building:

      "I swear I was only testing the search engine results"

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  54. Exactly what the boom is about... by achacha · · Score: 1

    1. Lame product that doesn't work but gets funding...check
        I have tried using it for a few days and have never seen so many dead links (results of spider traps), unavailable servers, 404s, etc... it feels just like AltaVista in the days before the end.

    2. Lots of money without a real plan... check
        25 million for yet another search engine

    3. Marketing people advertising how great their work environment is to get attention... check
        *this

    4. ???

    5. Profit

    Yep, all in order here, cover your ears, boom coming again.

  55. Ah collusion... by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Unless of course enough of us get together and actually move the market in the direction we want.

    Actually, we do have the money to influence a small volume stock, but doing so would be collusion, I would think.

    --
    This is my sig.
  56. Perks? How about they fix their cruddy search 1st. by Huntr · · Score: 1

    The search results I'm getting from them are pretty bad, so far. I'm sure they still are working out the kinks, but really, should they be "rewarding" themselves by handing out all these perks when it seems the real objective, providing a decent, reliable search engine, hasn't been met?

    This is exactly the type of wasted VC behavior that went on in the late 90's.

  57. No it doesn't by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    Lot's of companies have perks. I once had a job offer where one of the perks was a tasty free lunch every day and a bonus system where I could trade my bonus for up to a month's paid vacation. I couldn't afford to take the job at the salary they were offering ever since my girlfriend sold me to my current masters (she racked up a ton of credit card debt in my name), and frankly I was nervous that there would be a trade off for such perks in insane amounts of unpaid overtime. Besides, I don't take much vacation anyway, and I'd worry about taking a month off (oh, look we didn't need him for a month, guess we can lay him off if need be).

    Oh, and of course, I was watching the special fetures on the Incredibles, and they showed some of the perks for working for Pixar. We all know there are a ton of perks for woking for Google.

    Frankly, in the old days at some companies, they had things like a company motor pools and pensions. So, muffin baskets don't impress me that much.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  58. searchme.com is better... by martin_b1sh0p · · Score: 1

    I've tried both Cuil and SearchMe.com and although I still prefer Google overall, I must say that I don't understand what the big deal with Cuil is (and why it's getting so much press) when SearchMe.com is way more "Visual" (isn't that what all the hype with Cuil is???)

  59. Reality check by grin · · Score: 1

    By the way about cuil indexing trillions of pages vs. it's being just a big lie: check your httpd access log, cos' nobody's gonna fake THAT. I've got plenty of hits from Twiceler (cuil's bot), but only on some sites. Most were only hit on /robots.txt. Some sites - even large ones - were not indexed at all. But some were thoroughly read, so I cannot really say the number is a lie, they seem to index lots of pages. Finding the content, now, that's another. But the interface seem to be a crap: if there's too much load on servers it returns "not found" instead of "server error". Stupid.

  60. Re:Who's going to admit they've cuiled themselves? by achacha · · Score: 1

    I feel your pain, my site being around since 1996 was not found but a copy of it embedded into another spam marketing site (dirty trick used by spammers) was found 90+ times, no other search engine is this dumb to fail to notice this... and none of the servers are up anymore which results in very stale data being kept around to boost their databases.

    Maybe they should cull their results to actually provide useful hits?

  61. This Proves Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like an awesome place to work, but how long will their $25 million VC funding last at this rate?

    As other high-flying dot-bombs have proven, $25 mil in VC money is chump change... and there are way more chumps out there where that came from.

    Like every Good Conservative knows, nothing spends sweeter than other people's money... especially when there's zero accountability (a situation all Good Conservatives strive for).

  62. and by unity100 · · Score: 0

    you are one of them morons who is not able to understand that just as every country's economy is linked in global world, each person's well being and spending power also linked to well being of a country's economy.

    basically bottom line is that you are unable to understand enough of those douchebags not able to spend due to going bankrupt, you are also going to go under if government doesnt do anything.

    please, get a ticket to neptune and leave us alone. no, better get a ticket on voyager iii.

    1. Re:and by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Good good job there on not comprehending my point., jizzmop.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  63. Oh no by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Please don't let prison rape be the new Godwin.

    1. Re:Oh no by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Do you know who else didn't want to talk about prison rape?

      Godwin's position is secure.

    2. Re:Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler?

    3. Re:Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH!

    4. Re:Oh no by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Wow, dude. Just wow.

  64. Anecdotal evidence Cuil sucks by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was searching for a preacher I read about in weird news who ran his motorcycle off stage during a sermon.

    http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Jeff+Harlow+preacher+motorcycle

    http://www.google.com/search?&q=jeff%20harlow%20motorcycle%20preacher&sourceid=firefox

    Cuil: No results were found for: Jeff Harlow preacher motorcycle

    Google: Every link on page one was about this incident.

    Enjoy the perks while they last, folks.

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
  65. your judgment falls short by unity100 · · Score: 1

    By the way, I think that it would be hard to out-cushy Google. Their campus is like Club Med and I have a hard time believing that they get anything close to maximum productivity out of their workforce because of it.

    you forget that software is a CREATIVE field. creation process is something mankind has never been able to totally figure out, how it works are a mystery.

    you can neither measure creativity, or systematize it, nor do anything 'structured' with it.

    a google employee engaging in nerf gun fights in %10 of its work hours can put something creative to the table that a, say, microsoft employee who works in %110 of his working hours in legacy corporate style cant. and this can turn the tables.

    and this is actually what its been like for the last ~12 years.

    1. Re:your judgment falls short by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is actually known for a rather relaxed work environment as well, you know.

    2. Re:your judgment falls short by unity100 · · Score: 1

      i dont know. i just gave an example. microsoft is comparably more conservative, legacy than google in my opinion.

  66. Um, no. by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    All this proves is that people at Cuil are living the good life at Cuil's expense.

    Possibly bad management at one company does not equal the return of the .com bubble.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  67. I thought wikia search was #1, oh my mistake by ukepyper · · Score: 1

    Ah, time to reminisce; remember the last time a story without news behind it came out? Let me remind you as Wiki Takes on Google!

    Or not, as the case proved.

    Is Cuil a story without news, or is it funding without a product? Either way, I doubt anyone will remember it in 3 months time, but that won't stop me applying for a job there...

  68. cuil == ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cuil == culo

  69. That's unusual! by KNicolson · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have a subsidised restaurant and sandwich bar. The coffee bars take the piss out of Starbucks.

    We have a subsidised restaurant, if you like sub-school dinner fare. Coffee is just piss.

    Free coffee and soft drinks from machines in each corner of each floor in each building.

    There's a water filter that's rather unhygenic even after boiling. We get one free drink and a snack (rice cracker, if you're lucky) once a month.

    Um, stale sandwiches and fruit left over from long meetings..?

    Occassional left-over food too.

    Fully stocked gym, several trainers, but only one working at a time, one physiotherapist. Open 24/7. Treatment room looks well equipped although I've never needed to used it.

    We can get a corporate rate at a local gym chain. Last time I asked it was about 10% off from 5,000 yen per month, so it's cheaper to join as an individual during a promotion.

    Doctor is in his office 5 times a week. Two nurses are always there.

    At least we have that too. Compulsory chest xrays and barium meals every year to keep that healthy glow.

    If anything, we'll complain when others are coming in at 8am and not going home until 8pm. People working long hours is not productive, it creates a bad atmosphere, if there's work for two people, employ a second person.

    My boss moans that I don't stay until 8 pm or later...

    This is a massive company in the UK. My site alone employs 2,000 people.

    This is a massive company in Japan. Almost all are the same.

    1. Re:That's unusual! by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I've heard from a couple different people that Japanese companies are *THE WORST*. Your story (though obviously sarcastic) seems to prove the point further.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  70. search results cuil by J3rryken · · Score: 0

    i was looking up: "steve ballmer" and it showed me a picture of some guy in a latex suit with his penis visible then i tried looking for some warez and it only showed leggit copies or shareware and when i searched for "porn" it returned 121,617,892,992 web pages as result

  71. Basic economy by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    What caused the bubble wasn't luxury. Things like snacks and food and special staff doesn't really cost all the much. What costs is things like marketting campaigns, executive bonusses, over-staffing, splurging on hardware and accomodation.

    If they have the correct number of staff, don't give the CEO a 1 million dollar christmas bonus, don't launch a 10 million dollar ad campaign, buy all SUN gear or have their headquarters in the center of an attractive city they aren't going to burn through 30+ million all that face. Muffins can be bought from the local baker. Strawberries can come from the supermarket.

    And for this small daily investment you get much happier employees.

    The alternative? The dutch company blokker (retailer) has a no-frills police. No water-cooler for instance, no soft-drinks machine (not even one you got to pay for) nothing extra. Who wants to work there? Nobody. In fact I happen to know they had to hugely overpay for their IT because nobody wants to work for them internally and even people in warehouses are leaving for greener pastures.

    Basic rule of business, spend money on things that give you a return on it. Being frugal can easily cost you far more then the pennies you save.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  72. Cuil indexes what you searched yesterday. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that Cuil indexes the keywords i searched yesterday and couldn't find.

    Maybe it even uses other search engines to fill gaps where it couldn't supply results the previous day ?

  73. What's The Big Deal by DorkRawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I just don't get why Cuil is getting all this attention. It doesn't do anything revolutionary enough to get people (this includes non-geeks that make up the VAST majority of the search market) to use anything but what they were using yesterday for search.

    Yes, it looks nice. Yes, it's got a hip image. But it has nothing that will put a dent in any of the major search engines usage.

    I'd call it a flash in the pan if it was bright enough for anybody to see.

  74. Re:Cuil has the symptoms by olddotter · · Score: 1

    I think he is saying these perks are a symptom of a bubble. Kinda like a fever is a symptom of an illness, not a cause of the illness.

    In general I'd say companies offering these perks shows either a real shortage of talent or really bad management!

  75. Re:Who's going to admit they've cuiled themselves? by Ciarang · · Score: 1

    I'll admit it too. The search results weren't all that bad, but they stuck a picture of some random guy (I'll regret saying that I'm sure) next to me for no apparent reason whatsoever.

    Screenshot here: http://blog.ciarang.com/posts/who-the-hell/

  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. I like the idea of a new kid on the block ... by Schmyz · · Score: 1

    With out getting in to all the hair pulling and finger pointing... Having a new "kid" on the serach engine block is a good thing...in so many ways I dont want to even take the time to type them all. In short past history has shown us, that in business, when a younger more aggressive element shows up...the only option for the old standered to survive is to change. Change is a good thing...not sure the share holders of "G" want that.. but it is. Besides...now with yahoo on the rocks (so to say)...Google getting involved in everything from the Tesla car to buying a nano tech bio company. Getting another BIG player in the game opens lots of opportunities for all those little computer companies looking for a future buyout exit stratagy. Just my 2 cents

  78. OH REALLY?!? ... by hawkeesk8 · · Score: 1

    Let's do a comparison, then, shall we?
    NASDAQ Composite Index:
    Mar 24, 2000 -> $4,963
    Today -> $2,350

    I would suggest the poster give their head a real hard shake and think of another title.

  79. Perks, yes. Headcount, no. by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Cuil isn't overspending. I've been over there. They only have about 30 employees. They didn't overdo the server hardware, either.

    Bringing in lunch makes sense. They're on a quiet suburban street with only one modest, overcrowded restaurant nearby. Cuil is too small for a cafeteria. Bringing in food saves considerable staff time compared to sending everyone out for lunch.

    That's not the problem. The search results are the problem, of course.

    1. Re:Perks, yes. Headcount, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it would've been ok if they ordered lunch in everyday and their search engine was great, unfortunately, that's not the case and because of that, we can criticize everything they do and be right.

      http://www.cbcjobs.com - sometimes you just need another job

    2. Re:Perks, yes. Headcount, no. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      They didn't overdo the server hardware, either.

      That might explain why their search results are such shite -- not enough hardware being thrown at the "relevance" problem to solve it sufficiently.

    3. Re:Perks, yes. Headcount, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When employees are your only assets I don't think its over the top. Having healthy/happy employees would be my first priority... also i think they have something going on for them... they just need to index more stuff... because right now it does suck but give it time and i'm sure they'll kick some ass!

  80. Is it needed? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Do we really need more pages indexed (not sites perse) when google is already overflowing? No.

    What we need is a search engine that gives us ACCURATE results and filters out all the filler websites with no content.

    For instance, if I am searching for "[GAMENAME] cheat" is get countless results all from sites that just include every damn game on their site with the word cheat but no actual cheats. These types of sites should be filtered.

    For simple searches google seems to have picked up on the fact that Wikipedia is the new search engine. It is often the top result and in fact often I don't even bother with google anymore, just head straight to wikipedia.

    The problem is simply that search engine don't yet understand WHAT we are looking for. They just list the sites that have the words we want on a page and then sort them by some system but this system is easily fooled as any search user can tell you.

    Quil doesn't seem to be even worse then google at this. Don't impress us with number of results, impress me by making the first page actually give me the type of sites I am looking for.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Is it needed? by Shados · · Score: 1

      http://www.trueknowledge.com/

      Its really rough on the side, and isn't quite versatile enough yet, but the idea behind it shows promise... It literally parse your query to figure out what you meant in natural language, translate that in something more usuable by a computer, then use a logical bank of keyword to understand the full meaning of your request, then give you exactly the answer you want.

      So you can type "How old is XYZ", and it will tell you something like "I understand your query as asking what is the length of time that has passed since the date of birth of XYZ", then give you the exact answer, along with its primary sources.

      Its pretty cool, honestly (right now it doesn't understand enough query variations though. Its getting there).

  81. not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll believe the bubble is back when Cuil gets a spokespuppet.

  82. Nother slashvertorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    which is an example poor usability and also that their algorithm is probably brain dead simple.

    Why are we still talking about this non entity? I sense an slashvertorial.

  83. Bubble as in vaporware? by Unmanifest · · Score: 1
    Bubble in the sense of a big fanfare over nothing, maybe.

    I used it and couldn't believe how bad it was. Few results, most of them irrelevant.

    Alltheweb.com is a better alternative to Google, if that's what you're looking for.

    I've honestly not used a WORSE search engine than Cuil in many years.

    Makes me wonder: why the hype?

  84. I was impressed... by DaveP+in+Ohio · · Score: 1

    Hell, Slashdot ran a story [slashdot.org] reporting them to index more than Google

    I was impressed by the fact that on the day of it's release I started typing my company's name and it predicted my entry and brought me up to a full page of references to our hospital. Then I tested it a little harder... it didn't predict the model names of my 1975 or 1980 electric cars, but found pages of references. Then I through it a really tough one... I punched up the 'name' we refer to my one electric car by.. and I found a picture of MY CAR staring back at me... I think they are headed in the right direction. Good luck!

    1. Re:I was impressed... by DaveP+in+Ohio · · Score: 1

      Then I through it a really tough one...

      threw, not through... duh! :)

  85. I remember when Google was an infant by LM741N · · Score: 1

    and people had the same doubts. However, I don't know if they spoiled their employees or not, or how thrifty they were in general, but it did seem to take them a while to get their act together as a search engine.

  86. How dare they! by Comboman · · Score: 1

    The nerve of a company to treat its employees like they are valuable assets instead of galley slaves! That's what caused the dot com bubble to burst, not companies with no solid business plan to monetize their ideas and venture capitalists who dumped money into any company that was doing something with the interwebs without doing any research.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:How dare they! by DogDude · · Score: 1

      It's more responsible for a company to be profitable and be able to provide steady employment for its employees, than to get them gadgets. After the business is successful, THEN it can take care of its employees. A company that wastes cash does its employees no favors.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  87. Business Models Prove Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many dot-com business models did draw revenue from real customers who in turn did receive some service or product that made complete sense.

    Here are two comparisons of operating websites and dom-com sites that failed. Each pair had the same (or at least similar) business model.

    Amazon and E-Toys each sold non-perishable merchandise. The goods could be shipped cheaply, and weren't time-sensitive.

    Amazon sells diversified products year-round today. People will buy books or electronics year-round.

    E-Toys sold just toys, which have seasonal spikes. This made the Christmas season too important to them. Since the E-Toys servers couldn't handle the Christmas load, the company lost critical buisness.

    Pets.com and the supermarket websites, e.g. peapod.com, deliver (semi-)perishable foods to customers.

    The Pets.com model lacked infrastructure. They sent customers a single bag of dog food via a shipping company, e.g. USPS. The shipping costs cut into profits.

    The supermarket websites have local brick-and-mortar stores to act as shipping warehouses. These companies use their own trucks. They keep shipping costs down, with both short distances and high volumes.

    A good business model is not enough. There must be an efficient execution plan as well.

  88. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all about getting a little buzz going to
    wake up the desperadoes in Redmond. Why not party
    while you wait for M/S to buy you? They seem to
    enjoy buying immature ideas like Powerset, et al.
    Then again, maybe Yahoo! might be interested as
    well.

  89. Tis the season by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

    "Bowls of strawberries and muffins lie around the rest area"

    In their defense, strawberries are in season. Might as well eat them while they're good.

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  90. What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for, for example, "reset ssg5 default settings" on Cuil - you get 0 results. Search for it on Google and you get first 2 pages of exactly when you're looking for - instructions on how to reset a Juniper SSG5 to default settings. These guys are not going to last...

  91. Google had growing pains too... by ekeko · · Score: 1
  92. What bubble? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    "Cuil may only have launched this week, but it seems that they're already enjoying late-90s boom-style comforts.

    AFAICT, such comforts are not all that uncommon in well-funded startups as tools for morale and motivation; what was atypical of the late-90s boom is that companies continued acting like "startups" for much longer than investors would stand for now, not only in terms of comforts provided for staff, but more importantly in terms of continuing to burn through money without turning a profit. And, while doing that, they attracted investment as if they were as solid as blue chip stocks.

    If Cuil is around five years from now with similar comforts, a half-billion dollar market cap, burning through a million dollars a week with no prospects of profit in sight, with strong and rising stock prices, that would be a sign that the bubble is back.

    1. Re:What bubble? by Shados · · Score: 1

      Admitedly, there are quite a few relatively large, mature software companies who do that stuff. Maybe not to that level, but still. If you have a revolutionary idea, have big customers, yet your app isn't so tough to maintain (relatively speaking), money can flow quite nicely, and as long as you're not publicly traded, you can burn the extra cash if you want. Its still an investment, since it helps retain employees, which is an extremely severe problem these days, with the IT job market starved for -qualified- people (I stress the word qualified).

  93. Yes, it does suck. by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    I got several 0 result queries when I tried Cuil, so I think they forgot to index some sites.

    At least with broad results you can refine with more terms or operators or both.

    I didn't like the format of cuil, I like using google to get 100 listings per page.....

    --
    music lover since 1969
    1. Re:Yes, it does suck. by aws910 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm kicking a dead horse here, but it also inserts ads randomly. I searched for "dodge viper" and on the grey sidebox the first result was "acura vehicles". Honestly, could you make it any more obvious that you're selling the keywords to acura here?(its not due to alphabetizing either as the rest of the list is in a different order)

      To summarize *my* beef with them, "they both advertise, but at least google *labels* their ads as such".

  94. Ugh. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Google: Multi-billion dollar world-wide infrastructure where they like to build their data centers near power generation stations because they use so much electricity, own thousands of miles of 'dark fiber' and even after years of this build-up, STILL give generally reliable search results and with a few exceptions, I more or less buy their, "do-no-evil" tag line. All this as a result of two guys who thought, "Hey, what if somebody made an uncluttered search engine with unobtrusive advertising that was REALLY, ACTUALLY user-friendly and didn't suck to use?"

    Versus. . .

    Me too, and we're so 'Cuil' because our imagination-lacking, safe-road and thus lame investors and marketing people figured we needed that MTV-zing to be hip with the kids, y'know?

    Get real. What are they bringing to the table which is new? If nothing, then they are just lame opportunists who probably don't know what the heck they are doing because if they did, they're recognize that they're already in stupid-land. UNLESS, and this is my cynical side, there are some smart people involved who are actually just out to fleece investors with an "Honest, see, we're Really Trying" make-work company which everybody with a brain knows isn't actually doing anything but they didn't want to get real jobs.

    I can think of a dozen truly useful things one could do with 25 million dollars, but which will not happen because of everything wrong with the world which makes the above scenario a common reality.

    The sad thing is that this stupid start-up is getting press. I guess the same is true of internet start-ups as was true of Joseph Goebbels; say it loud and often enough and it becomes true. The bigger the lie, and all that. --Until it comes crashing to the ground when reality kicks in, of course. (Which also tends to happen with governments built on lies).

    But on the off-chance that I'm being unfairly cynical, I will put in this one proviso; MAYBE, just MAYBE there are some people at the top of 'Cuil' whose personal passion actually, honestly, really is to build a better search engine and improve the world, in which case, Good For Them!

    Whoa. I didn't even make it half-way through that sentence with a straight face. And I tried, too! Oh, well nevermind.

    -FL

    1. Re:Ugh. by ardle · · Score: 1

      All this as a result of two guys who thought, "Hey, what if somebody made an uncluttered search engine with unobtrusive advertising that was REALLY, ACTUALLY user-friendly and didn't suck to use?"

      Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Google started out with no ads, which, in the days before broadband, was welcome simply because of faster page loads. The results were refreshingly relevant, too.
      Their popularity was not enough to make them as big as we wanted them to be, so they sold some of the page off for text ads. Then they had a business model.

  95. What sweat shops are you working in?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bowl of muffins is somehow a lavish "90's bubble" extravagance? WTF!

    If $20 in muffins every day, a bit of healthcare helps keep employees happy and healthy, its worth the investment!

    The poster seems ignorant about what kind of BS the bubble companies were wasting their money on: $800 Aeron chairs for everyone, designer furniture, arcade games (and they weren't even paying reasonable prices for them, they were driving up Ebay prices to ridiculous levels like $1600 each for a Galaga or Ms Pacman), etc, etc

    Even catered meals is good. If it keeps your employees accessible (ie: AT WORK) rather than wasting 2 hrs off at some restaurant, then it's a great investment. (Keep in mind that catered meals do not cost the same as what we pay as individuals. It's not as extravagant as it seems)

  96. cuil hates kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeze, cuil even scr*ws parents and kids!

    http://parentzing.wordpress.com

  97. Weird engine... by gabec · · Score: 1

    It seems to be selective... if you search for something mainstream, Cuil will find some reasonable results... Search for something obscure and you get no results at all... Yet their whole claim to fame (or half of it, the second half being founded by ex-googlers) is their immense search base, right?

  98. Did they index anything BUT gay porn? by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    > Do that to Cuil and you get a penis.

    El Reg has a story about that, too, for a different search. It seems like they've managed to index more gay porn than anything else.

  99. PR versus reality by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

    How do you spot a company that's more interested in their image than their product?

    Many blogs noted that cuil.com can't find itself if you search for "cuil" (without quotes). Few days later, apparently something changed and the first two results for "cuil" are suddenly relevant:

    121,578 results for cuil

    1. cuil.com (Cuil)
    2. cuil.com/info/ (Cuil - The World's Biggest Search Engine)
    3. www.properazzi.com/Cuil-Mhuine+Irel... (Properties for sale in Cuil Mhuine, Ireland - Properazzi)
    4. cdrom.launch.com/track/504676 (Chase Around The Windmill: Toss The Feathers/Ballinasloe ...)
    5. topsecretmp3.com/track/159/112152/1... (Download Legal &Chase Around The Windmill: Toss The ...) ...

    Hmm, but result 3 and onward are totally irrelevant, those are the same exact old results we had couple of days ago, where are the reviews, all the press cuil got last few days? Try this, now, search for "cuil " (without quotes, just add a space):

    121,578 results for cuil

    1. www.properazzi.com/Cuil-Mhuine+Irel... (Properties for sale in Cuil Mhuine, Ireland - Properazzi)
    2. cdrom.launch.com/track/504676 (Chase Around The Windmill: Toss The Feathers/Ballinasloe ...)
    3. topsecretmp3.com/track/159/112152/1... (Download Legal &Chase Around The Windmill: Toss The ...) ...

    Same results, without the first 2 relevant results. I guess someone hand-edited the results for "cuil" but unfortunately forgot to trim the spaces first. Notice it shows 121,578 results in both cases, although the results are apparently different.

    Embarassing. I bet if they see this post they'll fix that too. Well, that's one resultset fixed, couple of hundred billion more to go!

  100. Cuil Doesn't provide answers to VC funding by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    In the posting, it mentions "How long will $25 million VC funding last at this rate?".

    Now, I was about to call the PR/Media Rep for Cuil to provide some answers. But after digging around on their website http://www.cuil.com/search?q=how+long+will+%2425+million+VC+funding+last+at+this+rate they really aren't providing any answers. Really. Nothing. Nada. Zilch.

    When I went on Google, http://www.google.ca/search?q=how+long+will+%2425+million+VC+funding+last+at+this+rate&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
    they weren't able to provide me with an answer about Cuil. But they provided me with 96,000 possible answers.

    Strange. Cuil really needs to provide substantive answers about their own company before I use them. Whatever they are feeding their employees its really not the right stuff.

  101. BBQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A doctor calls round each Friday, after the weekly barbeque, to see if everyone's in good health."

    Is there something in the BBQ food they're not telling employees about?

  102. Perks sound like OmniTI's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like OmniTI. We even have a kegerator in the break room. Only we're not a startup, we do fun Internetty stuff and we've been profitable every year since inception. Go figure!

    Shouldn't everyone have perks like these?

  103. Probability... by encoderer · · Score: 1

    how likely is it that the huge number they claim that I look up next is a multiple of that 2,784 number? 1 out of 2,784.

    Look, I don't know you. And I don't really even think cuil is that good of a search engine. Maybe it has promise, time will tell.

    But this is NOT a matter of "point of view." Probability is deterministic. It's not a matter of opinion or pov. It's arithmetic.

    And this is why I said if your "magic number" was prime, THAT would be a little more interesting. Because if it were, then you'd be correct: The probability would be pretty low.

    But 2784 has 24 factors.

    So, what is the probability that any given number is a factor of 121,617,892,992? I don't know off the top of my head. But there are hundreds of them.

    You are assigning meaning to something that is meaningless.

    1. Re:Probability... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're pretty fucking thick. I don't doubt that you have knowledge, but you're misusing it. It has nothing to do with factors. Look, there's nothing special about the index size, it's pretty much a random number in the whereabouts of 121 billion, correct? We must agree on that. And our arbitrary number could be any number, I mean, the falsifiability of my claim can be tested by trying any other number.

      So, considered the order of magnitude of each number, the distribution of the module of the index by my "magic number" is roughly normal, correct? Therefore, the probability for the result of the modulo to be 0 is 1/my_magic_number. What's hard to understand about this? And don't give me no shit about factors, give me a piece of your mind about the modulo and its distribution.

      It's not like I found this number by decomposing the index into factors to begin with. I found it by performing a search that only returned 1 result but Cuil claimed to have 2,784. It's not like I tailored it to fit. From that point on, how far fetched is it to ponder if, just like when it claims 2,784 results I only get one, that if it claims to have an index of 43,684,588 * 2,784 it really may only have 43,684,588, considered there's only a 1 in 2,784 chance that this 43,684,588 would be an integer to begin with, considered the index modulo that 2,784 number should be random?

      I accept your apology for calling me a moron.

      Probability is deterministic. It's not a matter of opinion or pov. It's arithmetic.

      Isn't the word you're looking for stochastic?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Probability... by encoderer · · Score: 1

      I have figured out that you are a moron and therefore this is the last post I will make, or read, in this thread. I do not have time to banter with morons.

      This is very simple. Imagine this equation:

      X mod Y = 0

      This is what you're talking about. It was evenly divisible, it was "integer" no matter how you say it, it's the same thing.

      Now, listen carefully:

      For ANY combination of X and Y above, for the equation to be true, no matter what, Y is ALWAYS a factor of X.

      In your case, it's

      IndexSize mod MagicNumber = 0.

      Your MagicNumber is a FACTOR of IndexSize.

      You seem to think that's unusual. It's NOT. There are HUNDREDS of factors of IndexSize.

      It's not as if you ran across the ONE factor of IndexSize. There are HUNDREDS. Perhaps THOUSANDS.

      For EACH of those factors, the modulo would be 0.

      Your MagicNumber could've been, as I said, "3."

      IndexSize mod 3 = 0.

      It could've been 48.

      IndexSize mod 48 = 0

      It could've been HUNDREDS of other numbers, it would be evenly divisible.

      This is a single data point. It proves nothing CLOSE to what you think it does.

      Nothing.

      Also, I don't think "order of magnitude" means what you think it does.

    3. Re:Probability... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Wow, is it some sort of elaborate joke that consists in calling people morons while yourself coming off as a retard?

      If you can't nail something with a hammer, try a screwdriver, it may be a screw. Translation : try addressing the points I make instead of repeating the same clueless bullshit.

      Loser.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  104. not a Bubble, try a TUMOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not referring to CUIL in particular which is cool, but the term bubble nowadays is overused, perhaps a more appropriate term when speaking of the housing and finance bubbles would be TUMOR...

  105. Are you nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you been to the top floor of your building lately? The perks up there start at "team of hookers and blow" and move right on to "private jet," for people whose main achievement has been picking the right parents when they were born.

    And you think your work ethic is being damaged by a bowl of fruit?!

    Yeah, I'm pissed. Just came back from Networkers. (I refuse to call it "Cisco LIVE!") Us CCIEs flew coach. The wastes of oxygen upstairs flew first-class. We spent our time hashing out crap with Cisco. They went to Disneyland with rented companions.

    You must be young. Pull a few 72-hour troubleshooting sessions with me caused by MBAs who won't frakkin' listen and then see if you think cherries, a massage and a few hours with your kids is "coddling" you.

    Punk.

  106. stock photos = trademark infringement | defamation by pbhj · · Score: 1

    pictures that come up on the results are stock photos - not any relation to the site content at all

    I've searched on a business I'm a director of, the images shown alongside our name do not reflect our product and in fact I'd say they defame it somewhat. That sucks, if we weren't such a small business I think we'd have grounds to sue them.

    Also, several results come up with our page content that do not link to our site.

    This does not look good. I'm not happy.

  107. Re:Who's going to admit they've cuiled themselves? by ardle · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should cuil their results to actually provide useful hits?

    Someone should have told those venture capitalists that cuil sounds a lot like caill. "Caill" would not be a good name for a search engine ;-)

  108. Cuil Proves Bubble is Back by SUCKING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search return on a Cuil query for "cuil."

    "We didn't find any results for Cuil. Try to think of different words to describe your search."

    I think that pretty much says it all.

  109. Cuil strength is not in the result set... by mrboyd · · Score: 1

    It's in the association of words and proposition of related topics. For example my search on "hot boiled potato" gave me a category box with the only obviously related topic "German Sausage". Now I know I want to try a "LandjÃger" with my potatoes.

    Isn't that Cuil/kweel/cool/bleh?

    For real search there is always google...

  110. How long? by zork5555 · · Score: 1
    Quote: "but how long will their $25 million VC funding last at this rate?"

    Answer: not long if they don't improve their crap site!

  111. Localization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To bad it can't handle the swedish characters åäö...It looks like UTF8 to ISO-8859-1 problems...

  112. Re:Conjugal visits? by swaza1 · · Score: 1

    For most /.ers whose left hands don't know what their right hands are doing, this is likely NOT a benefit.

    --

    "He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom."
  113. your sig by blade.labs · · Score: 1

    reminded me that it is time for a cigarette break

  114. An experiment. by DrOct · · Score: 1

    So far I'm not impressed. I've been playing a lot of online Diplomacy lately, so the first thing I thought to test out the new search engine was to put in "diplomacy game." On the first page I got a fair number of results related to the game. Things like ebay listings and such, but none of the bigger diplomacy sites, and a fair number that didn't have anything to do with the game (most had to do with real diplomacy, but a surprising number had to do with "diplomas"). Seemed ok. Not great, but at least most of the results were somewhat relevant. Then I tried "online diplomacy game." First page mostly did in fact have to do with diplomacy, mostly sites that mentioned play by e-mail games, a couple of sites connected with EA/Mythic (apparently one of the founders worked on an online diplomacy game ages ago. I wonder if my friend who works there knows that?) a few forum games, and a couple of links to other strategy games that happened to use the word "diplomacy" on their webpage. Ok, seemed ok but not great, and not exactly what I was looking for. Then as I went a few pages in hoping to find more of what I was looking for: next couple pages are basically more of the same in fact several of them appear to be more or less the same results as I saw on the first page. This continued for several pages, there were more and more unrelated results some had to do with real diplomacy and international relations, and a lot of them had to do with "online digital photo printing." Going about 7 or 8 pages in, I kept getting basically the same results every page, none of which were what I was looking for. Same search in Google turned up sites on which you can play diplomacy online, a Wikipedia page about the game of Diplomacy, a place to buy the physical board game, a newsgroup about the game, and several of the biggest diplomacy strategy and general information sites online. Second page was still pretty relevant, and including more sites you can play on, including the site I play on (http://phpdiplomacy.net/), third page had more useful Diplomacy related resources, and so far none of them appear to be dupes, or only tangentially related to the game of diplomacy or playing online. Basically Google still gets me much more useful and relevant results than Cuil. Now maybe that'll change, but for now, I'm not likely to use Cuil, except to mess around with every so often to see if they've improved. They may have indexed more of the web than Google, but that's pretty worthless when the results aren't helpful. Googles big claim to fame back in the day was that they gave you more relevant and helpful results, not that they had indexed more of the web than any of their competitors.

  115. Cuil = not that great by grasshopper77 · · Score: 1

    I've played with Cuil a bit and i don't like it at all. First off, it's too dark and doesn't appear to offer any services beyond search. The results pages are horrendous, i don't care how many of them there are. I welcome a competitor to Google always but i'm not giving up my Google-lifestyle for this new search engine, that's for certain.

  116. Google? by rtechie · · Score: 1

    Google has absurd perks, far greater than anything I say during the tech boom. Citrix is also very well known for treating their employees well. I've worked for a number of companies with similar cultures.

    The fact is, this model (which revolves about having the "best of the best" talent) works for many companies. These companies tend to have elaborate hiring processes because of the "best of the best" mentality.

  117. Re:Cuil Need Prove Nothing by lpq · · Score: 1

    I think that the bigger proof is that their product sucks ass.

    Maybe...but was google "perfect" when it first hit the web? (I don't know)
    When I found out about google, it was already getting to be top on the block...
    altavista was best before it, I think...but everyone has to start somewhere...

    CERTAINLY, Google needs some competition ... As "benign" as they appear to be, a little competition can still help them keep focused on improvements...

    No competition -- no strong push to "grow"....too much competition, you get squished, but some competition can be good for users/consumers as well as the company and furthering the technology...