Slashdot Mirror


Disney to Acquire Lucasfilm, Star Wars Episode 7 Due In 2015

Jason Levine writes "Disney will acquire Lucasfilm, including the Star Wars trilogy. Additionally, Star Wars: Episode 7 is due to be released in 2015, with more feature films on the way. George Lucas said, 'For the past 35 years, one of my greatest pleasures has been to see Star Wars passed from one generation to the next. It's now time for me to pass Star Wars on to a new generation of filmmakers. I've always believed that Star Wars could live beyond me, and I thought it was important to set up the transition during my lifetime. I'm confident that with Lucasfilm under the leadership of Kathleen Kennedy, and having a new home within the Disney organization, Star Wars will certainly live on and flourish for many generations to come.'"

557 of 816 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by greenguy · · Score: 5, Funny

    *checks date* ...Still October..

    --
    What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    1. Re:Huh? by toriver · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think it's a Halloween thing, they try to scare us...

    2. Re:Huh? by niado · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seconded, I literally glanced at the calendar after reading this summary.

    3. Re:Huh? by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it's a Halloween thing, they try to scare us...

      Darth Mickey?

      But seriously....would have been better to sell it to Seth MacFarlane, he showed a good bit of love for the franchise with his Family Guy send ups of it....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Huh? by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      *checks date* ...Still October..

      Its the traditional "october surprise" we have toward the end of a presidential election cycle.

      I'm not sure who is supposed to benefit by this one. Easily the weirdest one in history.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Huh? by Melkman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Darth Mickey?

      How long before we see a T-shirt with Mickey holding a light saber and the text below it:
      Minnie, I am your father.....

    6. Re:Huh? by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

      Me too. The feeling of unreality has not yet left me!

    7. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Probably never, since Minnie is supposed to be his girlfriend/wife/significant other. They were never related.

      Here's something disturbing that you'll never un-see however. Picture this in Mickey's voice:

      Ha-haa, ha-haa, I am your father, ha-haa!

    8. Re:Huh? by Abreu · · Score: 3, Funny

      [Tinfoil hat]

      It was clearly designed by the republicans, who are trying to pry the spotlight away from Obama and Hurricane Sandy relief efforts.

      Since nerds are commonly liberals, this is targeted towards a core democrat constituency.

      [/Tinfoil hat]

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Huh? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      *checks date* ...Still October..

      Yeah, when I first saw the headlines first thought was "hacked"

      Still, he hasn't done anything for years and now Disney will roll out Episodes 7,8,9

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:Huh? by yotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      How long before we see a T-shirt with Mickey holding a light saber and the text below it:
      Minnie, I am your father.....

      Never, unless you happen upon it in the 10 seconds between when it's posted, and when Disney sues the everloving fuck out of the creator.

    11. Re:Huh? by mrsquid0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sith MacFarlane? It would have been interesting.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    12. Re:Huh? by mrsquid0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just imagine Leia and Amidala as Disney princesses...

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    13. Re:Huh? by Zephyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Minnie must be his sister, then. Donald would be a better choice behind the breathing mask, anyway. Anger leads to the Duck Side.

    14. Re:Huh? by craigminah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Full Metal Disney has been on YouTube since August 2010 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3woEDTUbDYg
      ...and Full Metal Vader has been there since June 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgFgEqm3o60

      Maybe the Disney death squad is on strike. The Samuel L. Jackson and Joe Pesci Vader videos are about as good.

    15. Re:Huh? by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Darth Mickey?

        But seriously....would have been better to sell it to Seth MacFarlane, he showed a good bit of love for the franchise with his Family Guy send ups of it....

      Seth Greene as well (Robot Chicken). In fact the two series usually "competed" on that topic.

      On the other hand, I suppose Episode 7 will now feature wall-to-wall Macs, iPods, iPads, and iPhones... (I think Apple has a pretty big stake in Disney). All battling the (do no) evil Google empire and their droids.

    16. Re:Huh? by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      More like epic payday... royalties from action figures must have been tapering off.

    17. Re:Huh? by readin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love it. I can totally imagine Scrooge McDuck as Obi-wan Kenobi. Old, wise, tough as nails. Huey, Duey and Louie as the new generation of Jedi bringing back the old ways of hard work and honor!

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    18. Re:Huh? by Mabhatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really prefer that Seth Green guy better. The Robot Chicken sendup was funnier.

    19. Re:Huh? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      That could be fun.... Jim Henson was a big collaborator for character creation in the SW movies.

    20. Re:Huh? by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Dont' you mean Darth Mouse...or Darth White & the Seven Jedi...? :)

      On the one hand, this might be more terrifying than any hurricane could ever be! On the other, can Disney fubar up the franchise any worse than Lucas has done...?
      At least Disney knows how to tell a story, if nothing else. And after all, SW is just a fairy tale with a slap of space opera sci-fi on top.

      Hey, so long as there are no muppets & the main actors are over 10, I'll probably see it. I saw my 1st Imperial Star Destroyer explode onto the screen at 12, so Disney may just take me back to that galaxy that now seems so far, far away, after Lucas got through with it *grumble*...

    21. Re:Huh? by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      We're about 68 steps ahead of you there sparky! <EG>

    22. Re:Huh? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I really prefer that Seth Green guy better. The Robot Chicken sendup was funnier.

      Not just funnier - it actually added something to Star Wars beyond its own characters and braindead pop culture references. The Family Guy SW shows were pretty terrible.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    23. Re:Huh? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Goofy is the only mainline disney character tall enough to pull off Vader (and probably Chewbacca)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    24. Re:Huh? by MathFox · · Score: 4, Informative

      There already is a picture of Mickey crossing light-sabers: http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/63819000/jpg/_63819199_starwars.jpg (Minnie is in the picture too. *sigh*)

      --
      extern warranty;
      main()
      {
      (void)warranty;
      }
    25. Re:Huh? by iive · · Score: 1

      Your wish is granted (kind of..).
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20146942

    26. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So that puts Leia, Amidala, Fa Mulan, and Merida under the new category "Disney princesses who can kill you from a distance."

    27. Re:Huh? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      I'll see your Seth MacFarlane and raise you Seth Putnam. I suspect his version would just be a barely-intelligable "kill yourselves you sad fucks". Which could be done on a far lower budget.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    28. Re:Huh? by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah - I'd be quite happy to see Whedon or Abrams get their hands on it too. Granted, Disney (Pixar in particular) do some good stuff, but I don't see them doing anything more exciting and innovative than a generic explosions/CGI film lacking the script-driven elegance of the earlier, more civilized films. Disney aren't the company I'm looking for. Plus, their scripts are written by committees, to hide their numbers.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    29. Re:Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      They already have all this stuff on sale at Disneyland. Here's a link on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Disney-Star-Wars-Mickey-Minnie/dp/B004IJC7I2/ref=pd_sim_t_1

      Luke = Mickey
      Leia = Minnie
      Han = Donald
      Darth = Goofy
      C3P0 = Goofy
      Ewoks = Chip and Dale
      Emperor = Stitch
      Boba Fett = Pete
      Chewbacca = Goofy
      Anakin = Mickey
      Amidala = Minnie
      Shadow Trooper = Donald

      Yes. Every tall character is Goofy.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    30. Re:Huh? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3

      Have you ever been to Disney World? The Disney-Star Wars fusion has been here for years. It's not just the Star Tours ride (I've ridden the new ride and it is really cool). There's tons of Disney-fied Star Wars merchandise. Mickey as Luke Skywalker. Goofy as Darth Vader. Stitch as the Emperor (AND as Yoda). Donald as a stormtrooper. There's also Muppet-Star Wars items like Dr. Bunsen Honeydew-R2D2 and Beaker-C3PO.

      I'm cautiously optimistic with this. Yes, Disney is likely to market Star Wars like crazy, but then again, when has George Lucas *NOT* marketed it like crazy. He practically invented marketing movie characters.

      Now, if they could just convince Pixar to take on a Star Wars project....

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    31. Re:Huh? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Eew incest. After all Mickie and Minnie are an item.

    32. Re:Huh? by CodeHxr · · Score: 1

      No muppets... like Yoda?

    33. Re:Huh? by MouseTheLuckyDog · · Score: 1

      Do you know how long it was between 6 and 1?

    34. Re:Huh? by Kuroji · · Score: 2

      I wonder how telling it is that I notice George is carrying the RED one.

    35. Re:Huh? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Black Pete.
      He pre-dates even Mickey, and already has a sinister side.

    36. Re:Huh? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      There's also Muppet-Star Wars items like Dr. Bunsen Honeydew-R2D2 and Beaker-C3PO.

      And which muppet do they have playing Yoda?

    37. Re:Huh? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      BBCode doesn't work on Slashdot... they are going to be able to see that post! O_o

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    38. Re:Huh? by BenJury · · Score: 1

      You're right, its not Apple, however the 'Steve Jobs Trust' (according to Bloomberg) still owns 7.65% of Disney and is indeed still the largest stock holder. (State Street are second with 4.12%)

      --
      Blatant Advert: Android Apps!
    39. Re:Huh? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I thought of that too. He would be perfect in the role. (Would be funny too as he is quite rotund. Seeing his flab sticking out from under the Darth life support suit would be a hoot.)

      But modern Disney is not nearly that creative. They've been riding on Eisner's "lawyering" via continual copyright extensions for YEARS now. Most of their best recent stuff has actually been Pixar's work with Disney acting as financial backer.

      Frankly, Eisner should have spun off the corporate side of Disney into a generically named holding company (Mickey Holding LLC or something like that) and allowed the creative side to remain as Disney a long time ago. It would have kept the Disney brand pure and untainted and probably have made him more money in the long run.

      At any rate, I'm not really upset about this. Honestly, Disney can't do any worse than Lucas has with the Star Wars franchise, and frankly, their animated version of Star Wars has not only been more Canon faithful, but better written than the first two prequels. It was long past time for Lucas' ego to be removed from the Star Wars universe. Disney will do fine with Star Wars, although I suspect that our chance to return to the "gritty" universe version of the original trilogy is long past gone.

      Also, if I remember my Canon, Don't the next 3 books (Ostensibly the most logical choices for the follow-up trilogy) follow almost immediately after ROTJ? All the OT actors are OLD now. Are they going to do a series reboot or are they going to just CG the entire thing?

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    40. Re:Huh? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Rizzo the rat plays Yoda.

      Just to round out some of the other characters:
      Kermit = Luke
      Miss Piggy = Leia (makes sense, but then a Kermit-Piggy romance... ICK!)
      Link Hogthrob = Han Solo
      Fozzie Bear = Chewbacca
      Gonzo = Darth Vader
      Camilla the Chicken = Stormtrooper
      Sam the American Eagle = Obi-Wan

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    41. Re:Huh? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Oh. Seriously? I was just joking since Yoda is already a muppet.

    42. Re:Huh? by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Since nerds are commonly liberals, this is targeted towards a core democrat constituency.

      Really? I guess I'm hanging out with the wrong nerds...

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    43. Re:Huh? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Um, who do you think created the hurricanes? Katrina was created by Bush in a secret government experiment and Sandy is Romney just testing the wheel. I mean, duh.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    44. Re:Huh? by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      How long before we see a T-shirt with Mickey holding a light saber and the text below it:
      Minnie, who is your daddy.....

      Fixed that for you.

    45. Re:Huh? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Mickey is sitting in a bar, morosely nursing a Bourbon. Donald comes and sits next to him and orders a beer. "What's wrong, Mickey?"

      "I'm divorcing Minnie."

      "Why?"

      "Aww, she's fuckin' GOOFY."

      May the farce be with you...

    46. Re:Huh? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Honestly, Disney can't do any worse than Lucas has with the Star Wars franchise

      Geezer tip: when you think things can't possibly get any worse, they almost always do.

    47. Re:Huh? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Found a couple of photos of the figures:

      http://www.wired.com/geekdad/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/muppets_sw.jpg (My son has this set)

      http://www.mostlymuppet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/20110608-091608.jpg (This is a newer set)

      I've also seen Animal as Boba Fett (here: http://destinationvinylmation.com/2012/05/more-muppets-star-wars/ ) so I think they're expanding the line even more.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    48. Re:Huh? by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Darth Mickey?

      How long before we see a T-shirt with Mickey holding a light saber and the text below it:
      Minnie, I am your father.....

      Uhh...

      http://www.google.com/search?q=darth+mickey+t-shirt&hl=en&client=opera&hs=wkI&rls=en&channel=suggest&prmd=imvns&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=N2CRUNalJ6_xigLalYH4Cw&ved=0CAoQ_AUoAQ&biw=1863&bih=1073

      http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=darth+mickey&qpvt=darth+mickey&FORM=IGRE

      You folks never been to Asia / Chinatown before? I'm sure a lot of them are officially licensed versions also. Been around for many years.

      After the horrors Lucas inflicted on us with the new trilogy I'm surprised anyone is complaining. New ones can't possibly be worse or even as bad, as long as he's not in charge of production/writing/design/etc. anymore.

    49. Re:Huh? by hson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Seth Putnam is dead.

    50. Re:Huh? by tragedy · · Score: 1

      Pity they didn't have Gonzo as Yoda. That would have been a neat head-twisting meta-reference since they were both muppets with the same original voice actor.

    51. Re:Huh? by fatphil · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the "would" conditional was upon him being alive still, but I guess that wasn't clear. If we're throwing out hypotheticals that aren't going to happen, why should we restrict ourselves to those who are still breathing?

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    52. Re:Huh? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Hell, "lately?" Star Tours has been in Disneyland for 25 years now.

    53. Re:Huh? by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

      would have been better to sell it to Seth MacFarlane

      That is never a good idea, no matter the situation.

  2. I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

    1. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by nwf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like they'll sell out more than Lucas?

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Funny

      It took that long for the force to tell you about Episode 1? Jedi should maybe invest in cell phones.

    3. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Informative

      as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly...

      It ain't no trick to get rich quick
      If you dig dig dig with a shovel or a pick
      In a mine! In a mine! In a mine! In a mine!
      Where a million diamonds shine!
      Heigh ho, heigh ho, we'll rape your memories you know.

    4. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Narrowband · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm torn between thinking you need to be modded up and feeling like Lucas lost claim to Star Wars when he got his studio's films crossed and put Roger Rabbit in Episode 1 (just renamed Jar Jar Binks).

    5. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Splab · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've really hated how so many movies lately has been redone, but I'd be hard pressed to come up with anything that deserves a proper reboot more than the Star Wars episode 1 to 3.

    6. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you kidding? Great news!

      Now there's a small chance that we'll at least get transfers of the film reels from the early '90s THX-enhanced theater releases to BluRay, if not an even better cleaned-up version of the originals.

      Thank God George "we destroyed all the pre-Special Edition copies in the course of making it" Lucas' lying ass is finally out of the way. Bring on the hi-def, unmolested (well, mostly unmolested, at least) original trilogy!

      Disney loves money. Doing this will make them truckloads of money and cost very little.

    7. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Starship Troopers and The Postman.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    8. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      You know about Disney's release cycle, right?

      Star Wars will get transfers of the film reels from the early '90s THX-enhanced theater releases to BluRay all right -- and they'll keep them in their vault until 2040, when they'll release them to everyone who still has a BluRay player.

      Disney is even more hamfisted about what gets released when than Lucas -- and they might even edit some of the original content to "sanitize" it -- even more than Lucas.

    9. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by jythie · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is part of the enthusiasm that is perplexing me.. have people forgotten about Disney's behavior when it comes to releases... they are no stranger to locking away movies for decades or releasing edited versions... Lucas, while somewhat misguided, at least believed he was making things better and wanted people watching his stuff. Disney is too politically entangled when it comes to content and is into the 'artificial scarcity' model of releasing older works.

    10. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      They don't typically do that with their subsidiary studios, though, do they? Have they sent any of the Marvel movies to "the vault", for instance?

    11. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      and they might even edit some of the original content to "sanitize" it

      I don't think Disney "sanitizes" anything except movies released under the Disney label and rated G.

      Touchstone, Miramax, and Hollywood Pictures all made R-rated films, and Disney has released movies under their own label with PG-13 ratings for sexual content, such as Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides. Likewise, I'm fairly sure you would have heard from Joss Whedon about "The Avengers" being sanitized if that were the case.

    12. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      They don't typically do that with their subsidiary studios, though, do they? Have they sent any of the Marvel movies to "the vault", for instance?

      They did it with The Muppets.

    13. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Beerdood · · Score: 2

      Episode 7 : A crushed hope - Return of the Binks

      --
      Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM
    14. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      On the off chance someone here hasn't seen these already:

      http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-wars/

      Lucas couldn't tell a coherent story if he was only given one good one to choose from. Instead, his cadre of yes-men are probably who's responsible for the egotistical results of eps 1-3. Not satisfied with telling just 1 or 2 good stories in each movie, he decided to tell 5-10 in 2+hrs & totally confuse the audience, while losing all continuity, character development/association & compelling storyline, thus alienating the viewer totally. Then he packed in as many OTT light-saber fights & action sequences as he could cram into 24fps film lol! It's like he looked at all the core rules/principles of good story telling over the last 100 years of movie-making (& written works going 100s of years further back) & decided to not just throw them out completely, but do something totally *different* in all the possible different ways, just to be...well, different!

      Mr Plinkett does a far better expose of the madness than I ever could, so please, enjoy the ride if you haven't watched his reviews before boyz n girlz! ;)

    15. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      That may have been a problem in the age of the video cassette, but now with perfect digital duplication there would be... alternative distribution channels.
      Hell, people might even feel morally justified to use those channels.
      Err, I mean, more so than usual.

    16. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      thats only because they are still producing more in that universe once the comicbook movie fad ends the will be locked up as tight as any other Disney classic only available for a limited time title on limited edition collection. Won't be aproblem though all you will have to do is go to your freindly neighborhood torrent site and have the entire collection with each eddition

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    17. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by unitron · · Score: 1

      I've really hated how so many movies lately has been redone, but I'd be hard pressed to come up with anything that deserves a proper reboot more than the Star Wars episode 1 to 3.

      Nah, they just deserve the boot.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    18. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by sjames · · Score: 1

      The legal team fired up the C&D cannon again.

    19. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      I've got a bad feeling about this...

    20. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Starship Troopers? NO WAY.

      That movie is a masterpiece, dripping with satire. A PERFECT tribute to Heinlein and his crazy jingoistic views.

      Directed by the same guy who did RoboCop, ALSO dripping with satire.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    21. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      I've really hated how so many movies lately has been redone, but I'd be hard pressed to come up with anything that deserves a proper reboot more than the Star Wars episode 1 to 3.

      There's lots of great stories written after Episode 6 in the books. For example the Thrawn series. If it's episode 7 it's an advancement of the storyline and not a reboot.

    22. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by SilentStaid · · Score: 1

      Starship Troopers was perfect and damn your eyes for pretending it wasn't. Do you really think it would be better with current actors? Hell, maybe you'll suggest we somehow get the cast of How I Met Your Mother involved...

      It doesn't feel like it's been that long.

    23. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Darth Binks?

      "Meesa yousa massa!"

    24. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by stymy · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Starship Troopers is one of my favorite movies. It combines violence, witty dialogue, and wonderful satire.

    25. Re:I felt a great disturbance in the Force by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

      and they might even edit some of the original content to "sanitize" it -- even more than Lucas.

      That's unlikely, they never butchered their classic releases like Lucas did.

  3. It is October by jgtg32a · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not April

    1. Re:It is October by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Redneck 5 to Redneck 1...I'm commencing the spoon-drain run on the ride-on...coming in sharp at 60 degrees. Back-end was a little sloppy but I'm in!
      Uh oh...I've hit some bumpy terrain & rocks, mower is non-responsive, angle of attack too high - she's going to tip!!! Exit vents ahead...not...going...to...make...it!!
      Abandoning trench run Redneck leader, bailing out...I've got a dodgy wheel & not enough time or fuel to circle around for another pass. Should just make it back to trestle table with cold eski & beers with the juice I have left...running on vapours. Redneck 5 out.

  4. Obligatory by albeit+unknown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Noooooo!!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obligatory links:

      http://nooooooooooooooo.com (seems to be down at the moment)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Obligatory by dmomo · · Score: 2

      I've got a bad feeling about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Drkh0YLF8rI

    3. Re:Obligatory by Zephyn · · Score: 1

      Someone mentioned it earlier as well. I guess we shouldn't be surprised that this Disney/Star Wars news results in the nooooooooooooooo site getting slashdotted instead of the original article.

    4. Re:Obligatory by jcfandino · · Score: 1

      I wasn't slashdotted. I was a DMCA takedown from Disney Corp.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      *translation*

      DO NOT WANT!!!!

    6. Re:Obligatory by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      So, here's the funny thing. I heard the news right after it broke. I saw a discussion thread about it and I wanted to post a link to http://nooooooooooooooo.com/.

      Except, at the moment, that site was responding really slowly and took two minutes to load.
       
      ... as if, all over the world, millions of other people were also hitting the site at the same time...

  5. I feel a great disturbance in the force... by halfEvilTech · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was as if a million tech geeks screamed out in horror and were suddenly silenced

    1. Re:I feel a great disturbance in the force... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      It's kind of sad, but I think Disney would actually do a better job with the franchise than Lucas has.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    2. Re:I feel a great disturbance in the force... by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Can you pls clarify for us what sub-categories of fags there are, as you understand them, apart from 'assfags'? That way, the younger ones can decide for themselves whether SW is for them or not. Also, can you pls clarify if only low lifes can enjoy SW, or do they have to be faggots as well (actively fucking or not?). Much thanks in advance.

    3. Re:I feel a great disturbance in the force... by byornski · · Score: 1

      And he's not even a true Scotsman!

  6. Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Sez+Zero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disney/Marvel have Joss Whedon under contract through 2015. Just sayin'.

    1. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by morcego · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, if Joss Whedon takes over writing AND directing, it might actually work.

      --
      morcego
    2. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Ghostworks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful, they might just jump ahead to directly buying Joss Whedon.

    3. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reports have confirmed Joss Whedon is going to harvest Yellow Stone National Park of all lumber. When confronted with this information Joss replied,

      I am going to create the best and largest set of (wooden) actors that you will ever find. It will be a seamless transition from episodes 1 to 3. Even Lucas himself will not believe that he did not direct it.

    4. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Zinho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back in '06 Disney basically payed Pixar to come and fix the problems in their animation department, too. Disney's turned a corner since Michael Eisner left, and doesn't scare me as much as it used to.

      --
      "Space Exploration is not endless circles in low earth orbit." -Buzz Aldrin
    5. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by NoobixCube · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, Joss Whedon is the same as George Lucas: they both work well with supervision. Compare the Firefly comics with the series, so many things are just out of character and wrong in the comics, because Joss was unsupervised.

      Compare the old trilogy to the new: When George Lucas was doing the old trilogy, he was a young upstart with a niche artsy film to his name (American Graffiti). He was surrounded by people who weren't afraid to say "No, George, that's a stupid idea". Flash forward to the turn of the century, and you have George Lucas surrounded by sycophants saying "Yes, Mr. Lucas, sir! You're a visionary!"

      Joss Whedon's Star Wars would be a bigger disaster than three episodes about Jar Jar.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    6. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know, if Joss Whedon takes over writing AND directing, it might actually work.

      Yeah, Star Wars with decent writing and story telling - and probably something unique instead of rehashed serials from yesteryear.

      Just think, Luke Skywalker's daughter just doing her own thing, having a drink in that bar on Tatooine and out of the blue whispers, "Alderaan." and goes apeshit and beats the shit out of everyone.

    7. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      Okay, that just made my day.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    8. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by ottothecow · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let him rewrite the Zahn trilogy for screen and it might have a chance (but I doubt it will appeal to the kind of audience Disney wants...)

      There is so much star wars content (that has been blessed by way of licensing agreements) that takes place after the original trilogy that it seems like there would be no room to write anything original and not make it suck.

      --
      Bottles.
    9. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by lymond01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Joss Whedon's Star Wars would be a bigger disaster than three episodes about Jar Jar.

      I disagree. Serenity made me feel like Star Wars all over again: fun, smart, adventurous, light-hearted, but also thoughtful. Joss aces that kind of stuff. See Avengers for details.

    10. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by BinarySolo · · Score: 1

      I don't see how Whedon could possibly have time to do Avengers 2 and the Marvel TV show (which are what his current contract is for) and still have time to work on a Star Wars movie in any capacity.

    11. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by morcego · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, Joss Whedon is the same as George Lucas: they both work well with supervision. Compare the Firefly comics with the series, so many things are just out of character and wrong in the comics, because Joss was unsupervised.

      I will have to dispute that, and submit Dr. Horrible and Much Ado as evidence. Joss Whedon was 100% unsupervised when doing those.

      --
      morcego
    12. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm 99% confident is was George's wife who kept the first films on course. He had "creative ideas", but she turned them into reality on film. When they divorced the true force behind the films disappeared...

    13. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Avengers was terrible. _Terrible_!

    14. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Counterpoint: Empire Strikes Back, widely regarded as the best of the six films, was made by Irvin Kershner in his late 50s towards the end of his career. At the time, he'd been directing movies for over twenty years.

    15. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by aaronb1138 · · Score: 2

      It's really hard to pick a Mara Jade from that list you b*stard. On one hand, Glau has the grace to do some exceptional fight scenes. On the other hand, Dushku's voice and build are a superior match to the personality.

    16. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by fermion · · Score: 2
      This is may be a best case scenario. Whedon can write and direct and has been known to put a good scene on film. As much as everyone likes to say that Lucas can't really do anything, there are are some really good shots, and some passable dialog, in Star Wars. The opening shot of the ships, Luke looking over the desert, the first time we see Darth Vader, are all excellent. Lucas did define the technology we expect to see in a special effect film.

      That said the world has left Lucas behind, and it was one reason that the prequel was disappointing. What was acceptable in 1977 is simply not where we are in the 21st century. We know what technology can do, and just showboating technology does not a movie make. There are times when a little bit of fx can go far, and this is what Whedon can do as he worked on very tight budgets.

      But that still leaves a problem with episode 7-9 in that there is a lot out there that defines what happens after Jedi. One can do what they did in Star Trek and make anything outside the live action content non-cononical, but that risks making the biggest fans really unhappy as the books defined Star Wars for so long, and there can anything more than a cameo from the original stars would be likely to be problematic. Who own the right to the Skywalker kids?

      My impression was that the third set of three films was go be the rebuilding of the empire. Now we probably have a rebuilt empire, with one Skywalker-Solo child at the lead as a good Jedi, and another as the bad Sith. But this is pretty much episode 1-3, except with the no annoying child. What could be interesting is grand child who we actually see trained as Jedi and tormented by his duty to his parent, uncles, and aunts. After all, the Jedi training is supposed to be so great, but it has never really be fully explored.

      As an aside, I will remind people that anything with "A New Hope" or "Episode" in it is not the original Star Wars.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    17. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by morcego · · Score: 2

      Seriously ? I would cast Dushku without blinking for that role. Or if we go outside the usual suspects, Jessica Alba.

      Glau is another one that would work great either as Empire or Bounty Hunter.

      --
      morcego
    18. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you sure you're not confusing Serenity (the movie) with Firefly (the series)?

      The series was great. The movie was one of those great disappointments, where you feel like some studio exec said, "OK, we know we aren't getting a sequel, so let's ignore the entire back story and personality of our characters, throw in loads of gratuitous SFX and action scenes, and focus on only one or two characters out of a great ensemble cast while reducing the others to supporting roles or tragic-fate-fodder."

      Whedon's done some good work in his time, but IMHO Serenity was a low point.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    19. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      Morena got cheated out of Wonder Woman... she would make a great Leia.

    20. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2

      Knowing the cast is easy :) Figuring out their roles, that is the trick. Anyone care to guess ?

      Felicia Day as .... Alexis Denisof as ... Summer Glau as ... Eliza Dushku as ... Fran Kranz as ...

      Already guessed at Nathan Fillion's role, and I'll jest at a few more:
      Felicia Day as Jar Jar Binks, finally making the character less hate-able.
      Summer Glau as Jaina Solo
      Eliza Dushku as Mara Jade

      Let the reviling commence...

    21. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 3

      I really don't see NPH as Luke. But you know, Fran Kranz might work.

      Could have Alexis Denisof as Obi Wan Kenobi :)

      NPH should be someone from the empire.

      Douse him in blue, and he could be the most hilarious Thrawn ever conceived.

    22. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Felicia Day as ....
      Summer Glau as ..."
      can we please replaces these with people who can act?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Mara a redhead? YoSafBrig had some moves on her. Just say'n.

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    24. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by tepples · · Score: 2

      I am going to create the best and largest set of (wooden) actors that you will ever find.

      Bad omen. The last time Disney tried a wooden actor was Pinocchio (2002) starring Roberto Benigni. It flopped.

    25. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The prequel trilogy sucked, and made billions. Suckage does not seem to be a problem.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    26. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by darue · · Score: 1

      yep

    27. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      Episode 7 has Whedon written all over it: Jedi Leia.

    28. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Serenity was a low point - from the perspective of those who have watched the Firefly series. As a movie on it's own, it was actually quite good. "Above average" is how I'd put it - the best sci-fi movie I'd seen in a long time.

    29. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      Eliza Dushku as Jedi Leia
      Alexis Denisof as Han Solo
      Fran Kranz as Luke Skywalker
      Felicia Day as the Queen of Naboo
      Summer Glau as the next Sith Lord

    30. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by enoz · · Score: 1

      I could've sworn Avengers was another Michael Bay film.

    31. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      I saw Serenity before watching Firefly. It ranks in my 5 ten movies of all time (err...along with the Princess Bride if that gives you any idea of how I like my films). Firefly, of course, is a fleshing out of Serenity (or inverted vice versa) -- more detail of a great thing. I didn't feel the characters were different between TV and movie but I'll agree they all couldn't shine given the fact the movie wasn't 10 hours long. Which was a bummer.

      the best sci-fi movie I'd seen in a long time

      Yes.

    32. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by inhuman_4 · · Score: 1

      Dear God yes. Please do this!

    33. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by aaronb1138 · · Score: 1

      Tahmoh Penikett as Thrawn...

    34. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Nostromo21 · · Score: 1

      Stop pickin on gungans - they are the true masters of the Chaos side of the Force! ;-p

    35. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by unitron · · Score: 1

      Joss Whedon's Star Wars would be a bigger disaster than three episodes about Jar Jar.

      I disagree. Serenity made me feel like Star Wars all over again: fun, smart, adventurous, light-hearted, but also thoughtful. Joss aces that kind of stuff. See Avengers for details.

      Do you actually mean Serenity, the movie, or did you mean Firefly, the tv series?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    36. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      Let him rewrite the Zahn trilogy for screen and it might have a chance (but I doubt it will appeal to the kind of audience Disney wants...)

      The problem with this is the original actors are far too old to play the characters. As a fan of the original trilogy, I consider Luke, Leia and Han to be sacrosanct; I really don't think I'd want to see a film where they were portrayed by different actors.

    37. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Sputnik77 · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying. I understand contracts, Avengers 2: blah blah blah. But if Joss Whedon doesn't direct episode 8 I'm asking for my tickets back*. #attentiondisney * to planet Earth

    38. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Sputnik77 · · Score: 1

      What's his name? Agent Smith? Uhh... Cloud Atlas?

    39. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Ive always wanted to see the diff output between the George Lucas version of Empire Strikes Back
      and the Irvin Kershner version. Its well known they butted heads over the Carbon Freeze scene.
      But that cant be the only one. He says that was the only disagrement they had, but was it
      really the only time he and Lucas saw it differently. I imagine he must have made countless small
      contributions to the movie and I always wanted to sit down with Kershner and ask him about what
      he was given in the script and what he chose to shoot for so many scenes that I doubt that I'll ever
      have answers from other people. Hes at one with the force now, so I wont have my chance to ask him directly
      but I always look forward to more behind the scenes content from the archives, more so than any new movie or game set in the SW galaxy.

      I know he wasnt as deeply involved in SW as Lucas was, but I always wanted to know where he left his marks on the movie. Even if my questions were answered with "actually that was George's idea"

      The top guestions I wanted to ask Kershner:
      1 - The 'I am your father' scene. I wanted him to disect and describe this pivotal moment more than any other.
      2 - The Dinner, deception reveal and then the exchange between Vader and Lando. Was that exactly as scripted.
      3 - When they are briefing the bounty hunters, were all their little quirks of behavior in the script as written or did you direct the actors & puppeters to create some personanilty.
      4 - Was working with so many characters that lacked an emotive'face' challenging? what did you do to compensate where you couldnt get a facial expression in a shot?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    40. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Everything Summer Glau is in gets cancelled. If she is in Star Wars 7 it will be the last one, which may or may not be a good or bad thing, maybe.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying you got a huge malignant cancer that suddenly became sentient.

      Doesn't matter how smart it is, ultimately it's still going to kill you.

    42. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Tharkkun · · Score: 1

      They can hire Peter Jackson after the Hobbit's are done.

    43. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      I would love to see Glau as one of the Mandalorians. That would be epic.

    44. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by stymy · · Score: 1

      Well, how did you expect a 2-hour movie made on a low budget to cover every character in detail and provide them with proper character development? There's only time for so much, and while some of the action could be cut, that would provide room to develop at most 1 more character.

    45. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by angus_rg · · Score: 1

      You know, if Joss Whedon takes over writing AND directing, it might actually work.

      Spoiler Alert: Luke Skywalker dies in a epic battle with Darth Whedon, news at 11.

      I have to admi, it doesn't have a bad ring to it.

    46. Re:Joss Whedon's Star Wars by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Well, how did you expect a 2-hour movie made on a low budget to cover every character in detail and provide them with proper character development?

      I didn't. That's why Firefly was interesting and Serenity was disappointing. It tried to be One Big Film, and never had a chance of succeeding.

      But if they were going to make an extended single episode of Firefly, there was no need to trample on all of the background from the original series and destroy half the cast one way or another. They could have told a good story concentrating on part of the group without actively nerfing everyone else along the way.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  7. Really ? by Ziest · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't wait for "Star Wars on Ice"

    --
    Another day closer to redwood heaven
    1. Re:Really ? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3

      Seems like a great opportunity for yet-another-rehash of the battle of hoth.

    2. Re:Really ? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for "Star Wars on Ice"

      I hear it stinks on ice.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Really ? by SoVi3t · · Score: 2

      Marvel vs Capcom vs Disney MAKE IT HAPPEN

      --
      Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    4. Re:Really ? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      So, last we left our friends on the Ewok planet Endor, do I see an Ewok Christmas 2 on the horizon? A very Ewok Hannukah? A somber Ewok Kwanzaa?

    5. Re:Really ? by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      Is that like Star Wars meets Breaking Bad?

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    6. Re:Really ? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 2

      No, all life there was incinerated by the debris of the second Death Star.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:Really ? by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for "Star Wars on Ice"

      "Robot Chicken" already did this.

    8. Re:Really ? by dinfinity · · Score: 2

      You assume that such a thing does not exist yet.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhRZSifQe98

      At least the Star Trek one is animated:
      http://www.mwmw.com/bbradley/SHG/geek/stream.html (warning: sound - and an eyesore in general)

    9. Re:Really ? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Will they have grampa wookies getting off on porno like in the first Ewok Christmas?

    10. Re:Really ? by Jon_E · · Score: 1

      Didn't they already do this?? .. there was the Ewoks and the Magic Sunberries in the mid 80s, and I seem to recall something with one of the olympic teams or ice capades in the late 70s somewhere around the Donny and Marie specials on network TV

    11. Re:Really ? by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Now that they're both owned by the same company, we could see a reunion of the Muppet Show episode with Luke, C3PO, and R2D2.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    12. Re:Really ? by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can get Mel Brooks under contract and we can FINALLY get to see "Jews In Space" in its entirety.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    13. Re:Really ? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Only if gross assumption are made, and the technology shown in the series is ignored.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Really ? by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for "Star Wars on Ice"

      Okay I'd pay money to see Jar Jar Binks run over by a Zamboni machine. To see blood and inerds spray out the back would be very cathartic.

  8. Episode V by Russ1642 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He passed on the role of director to Irvin Kershner for the second film. He should have never returned to directing. Or casting. Or screenwriting.

    1. Re:Episode V by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2

      I'm tentatively hopeful that with it out of his hands, the next iteration may be slightly better than the previous. Tentatively.

    2. Re:Episode V by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll have a genius moment and hire the some of the scribes from Bioware. They've captured the flavor of the original trilogy far better then Lucas did in the prequels.

    3. Re:Episode V by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Garrus and Boba Fett standing next to each other as a thresher maw eats the sarlacc? Han Solo shuffling crews around to the broken mass relays? Joker and C-3PO duking it out for the affection of EDI?

      Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    4. Re:Episode V by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 2

      Garrus and Boba Fett standing next to each other as a thresher maw eats the sarlacc? Han Solo shuffling crews around to the broken mass relays? Joker and C-3PO duking it out for the affection of EDI?

      Your ideas are intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      While I was referring strictly to the Star Wars games (noteably KOTOR), those words do paint some vivid pictures =D

    5. Re:Episode V by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They also enjoy releasing all but the last season of a television series, so well never get a DVD of the final season of the Clone Wars (whenever it ends). For reference, check gargoyles, duck tales, darkwing duck, talespin, rescue rangers, etc. it's a catch 22 scenario with all of them: collectors wait until a complete set is available, but Disney won't make the last DVD if the initial buzz for the others isn't enough (doesn't matter how many are purchased later; initial buzz is everything to their decision).

  9. ILM/PIXAR/DISNEY by Holi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems fitting as Disney has already picked up a few of the older ILM guys when they acquired Pixar.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    1. Re:ILM/PIXAR/DISNEY by Holi · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry ILM should be Lucas Film. DUH

      Remember Pixar was a part of Lucas Films, and they now are for all intents and purposes Disney's animation group. I'm just saying this could be a good thing. Hell it's not like they can shit on the brand anymore then Lucas did with the Phantom Menace.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:ILM/PIXAR/DISNEY by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Hell it's not like they can shit on the brand anymore then Lucas did with the Phantom Menace.

      You're right. Disney won big with this one. People's expectations are already so low that Disney can get away with it's usual shenanigans, and people might actually think it is an improvement.

  10. Because it worked so well before by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Disney's acquisition of Pixar, Marvel, and the Muppets just worked out so well before. Although, they could hardly do worse than Lucas has.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Because it worked so well before by Squiddie · · Score: 2

      They will manage somehow.

    2. Re:Because it worked so well before by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your post reads as intensely sardonic and sarcastic, but I've seen only one failing from post-disney pixar(cars 2), and the marvel productions have been pretty good. Am I misreading sarcasm?

    3. Re:Because it worked so well before by DontScotty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah - Marvel was SUCH a bad buy for Disney, and horrible for Marvel...

      5/7/2010 Disney Iron Man 2 $128,122,480
      5/4/2012 Disney Marvel's The Avengers $207,438,708

    4. Re:Because it worked so well before by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pixar bought Disney, not the other way around. Steve Jobs' estate is the single largest Disney shareholder which he acquired by 'selling' Pixar.

      --
      Good-bye
    5. Re:Because it worked so well before by glwtta · · Score: 1

      What didn't work well with the Pixar and Marvel acquisitions? I was under the impression that they are both going pretty strong (admittedly, I'm not that well versed in those franchises).

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:Because it worked so well before by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, for PIXAR to have "bought" Disney, Jobs would have to have ended up with over 50% of Disney holdings. Instead, he received approximately 7% of Disney stock as part of the stock swap. While this did make him the single largest shareholder of Disney, he did not end up with enough stock to control the company. Two of the top institutional holders together (4% each) could easily outvote him (and now his estate).

      Then again, why let facts get in the way of a good story...

    7. Re:Because it worked so well before by houghi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are those the losses the Hollywood accountants came up with?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:Because it worked so well before by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      And the recent Muppet movie turned out pretty good too...

    9. Re:Because it worked so well before by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Pixar reverse acquired Disney. Toy Story 3. About the best #3 movie you can get.

      Marvel, they're comic book movies. None are great, but have given them massive amounts of cash.

      Muppets, well, not a classic film, but they did give the film to a Muppet nut, and let him run his vision. I can't say he ruined anything. It had it's moments. Even won an Oscar, in an off category.

    10. Re:Because it worked so well before by Swampash · · Score: 1

      You've fucked it up by treating "takeover" and "buy" as interchangeable.

      Disney bought Pixar in a deal that saw Pixar take over Disney, in the same way that Apple bought NeXT in a deal that saw NeXT take over Apple.

    11. Re:Because it worked so well before by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Many of the Marvel movies where great. Great writing, great story.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Because it worked so well before by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      Pixar did gain a great deal of creative control of Disney Studios, regardless of how the voting shares break down.

    13. Re:Because it worked so well before by Alomex · · Score: 1

      Pixar did gain a great deal of creative control of Disney Studios,

      Make that complete creative control. It was a condition of the Pixar purchase, and it worked. Disney is much better today financially and artistically that it ever was.

    14. Re:Because it worked so well before by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Stupid, dumb, cheap shot. Come on, add something to the discussion, rather than acting like a 12 year old geek who thinks he's being clever.

      pot kettle black

      hth hand

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Because it worked so well before by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Are those the losses the Hollywood accountants came up with?

      Double those numbers, of course.

    16. Re:Because it worked so well before by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      What is this reverse acquired Disney nonsense? You mean they got Disney stock for selling out?

  11. The money machine lives on by java_dev · · Score: 1

    What's your bet that the next movie will suck even more than the last three?

    1. Re:The money machine lives on by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Even better. The last 3 will go into the 'Disney Vault' for 20 years.

  12. Pixar + ILM by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two shops full of the best brains working under the same virtual roof. Might be interesting. Especially if we get writing/direction from someone other than George. Love ya, George, but hopefully the only wooden acting we'll see from now on will by Woody The Cowboy.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:Pixar + ILM by rritterson · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a little bit of irony, Pixar was originally part of ILM -- 1/3 of the Computer Graphics division. 26 years later, the two companies are back under the same umbrella.

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    2. Re:Pixar + ILM by parlancex · · Score: 1

      Until the latter is down-sized.

    3. Re:Pixar + ILM by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      They're going to need it if the next Star Wars trilogy is shot with 48 frame per second 4,000-line 3-D projection digital "film." Integrating special effects into such a state-of-the-art format is very complicated and hard to do, as Peter Jackson found out with the new "Hobbit" movies.

    4. Re:Pixar + ILM by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this means that ILM is no longer a free agent, equally willing to work with any other movie studio. Disney now controls one of the industry's premiere FX houses.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:Pixar + ILM by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Sure, but remember that the people at Pixar routinely rent themselves out to third party studios and lots of indirectly related industries that you're probably not even considering. They have skills and software and experience that they continue to seel, mercenary-style, throughout that industry. I suspect the parent company will be equally happy to keep the ILM guys busy in the same way.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  13. Best hope now Mayan end of world event by RichMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok I just flipped my opinion from "so what the Mayans are just issuing a calendar for the next year" to "oh noos signs of the apocalypse".

  14. Seriously? by tpjunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin! Then again, it couldn't be worse than episodes 1 and 2.

    1. Re:Seriously? by MrFlibbs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let the wailing and gnashing of teeth begin! Then again, it couldn't be worse than episodes 1 and 2.

      Oh yeah? Picture this: Luke Skywalker's son flying off to be trained in the ways of the force by an aging Jar-Jar Binks. After stopping on the way to pick up Chewbacca's son. On Life Day.

      Bet that's the scariest thought you'll have this Halloween.

    2. Re:Seriously? by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

      Ok, now I am gnashing my teeth

    3. Re:Seriously? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      it couldn't be worse than episodes 1 and 2.

      Or episode 3-that one was hardly a a masterpiece.
      As powerful as the Jedi were portrayed in previous films, episode three finally revealed that Han wasn't joking when he said 'Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side", and it contained lines that included "youngins", "you were our chosen one", and the fan favorite "Noooooooooooooooooooooo!"

    4. Re:Seriously? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      worse Milly Cyrus as princess Leia Jr

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  15. Lucas also said: by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's not my fault!"

    Personally, I have a bad feeling about this.

  16. If he had no other assets, Lucas is now the 91st richest man in America.

    I'd sell out for that too.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Damn by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      If he had no other assets, Lucas is now the 91st richest man in America.

      I'd sell out for that too.

      Hmmm. And here I thought Lucas was going to give Star Wars a rest so he could go back to making sensitive, independent art films that represent his true vision, the way he's always wanted to do. You know... films like Red Tails.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Damn by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Well, with metric tons of cash, and no access to ILM in the basement,he could easily make sensitive, low-budget art films. Or sensitive high-budget art films that are works of love and lose 90% of his investment.

      Not having ILM or LucasFilms around is going to be the best thing that happened to all future George Lucas movies.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  17. What could possibly... by Bungleman · · Score: 1

    Obligatory: what could possibly go wrong? Surely they can't do worse than the first three episodes (heh), but I'm not holding my breath. My poor childhood memories... a dead horse that's constantly being beaten. Yeah, I know that the horse spits out dollars with each hit, but please stop hitting it... please.

    1. Re:What could possibly... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Now that Lucas isn't steering the boat, they could release the original three films unmolested.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    2. Re:What could possibly... by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can even envision one of the teasers for the unmolested high def release.

      Simply show the most infamous scene, remastered in high def but otherwise unmodified from the theatrical release... with only one shot fired, as it should be. You end the teaser as the scene normally ends: Han flips the money at the bartender, says "Sorry about the mess", and the screen cuts to a simple date on a pure black background.

    3. Re:What could possibly... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      You win an internet. A new shiny one, not the leftovers from the 90's.

  18. Near-bankrupt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Disney near-bankrupt because of the rampant piracy on the Internet? And then Lucasfilm (Star Wars franchise is only a part of that, but in general it's mostly IP) being worth $4B in 2012 dollars? Who would have guessed...

  19. The original were mediocre children's movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So were the prequels, just for a different generation of children.

    And now a new set of children can enjoy the next batch

    Face it, the originals were decent, had some good effects but should hardly be remembered at all 35 years later.

    1. Re:The original were mediocre children's movies by freeweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hate to break it to you, but they made children's movies long before Star Wars. And very few were remembered 35 years later. You may not personally like them, but they were a hell of a lot more than just "mediocre children's movies", for several generations.

      Hell, my 30-something parents (at the time) absolutely loved them and saw them several times in the original theatrical run. While that may be no big deal today, with adults regularly going to "children's" movies - 30 years ago it was COMPLETELY UNHEARD OF.

      The originals completely defined the movie-going experience in ways we still don't fully understand. Damn near every movie made since then owes something to Star Wars - whether it's in merchandising, blockbusting, hype, promotion, special effects, genre-openness, sequel anticipation, or just plain cool factor.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  20. Could be worse.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least Lucas won't be in charge anymore.

    1. Re:Could be worse.. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      George Lucas is also getting a good amount of Disney shares.

      Old Disney model: Every few years, re-release movies from the "vault"

      New Disney model: Every few years, release "special edition" version of the classic movies with added cgi filler footage, claiming they "...are the movies Walt really wanted to make."

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    2. Re:Could be worse.. by c · · Score: 3, Funny

      Two words: Uwe Boll

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    3. Re:Could be worse.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Two words: Uwe Boll

      I felt a disturbance in the force.. As if millions of critics cried out, and were suddenly challenged to a boxing match.

    4. Re:Could be worse.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      What? Uwe Boll challenging people to boxing matches?

    5. Re:Could be worse.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      U mad bro?

    6. Re:Could be worse.. by dintech · · Score: 1

      Oh no. Uwe Boll, Star Wars, Pixar Tech.... Lego Star Wars: The Movie

    7. Re:Could be worse.. by c · · Score: 1

      > Oh no. Uwe Boll, Star Wars, Pixar Tech.... Lego Star Wars: The Movie

      Not a very... Boll-ish title. How about: Jedi Master: Blockheads 2? That vague sense of action, adventure and continuity while still pissing on the franchise.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  21. Re:This better be a joke. by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

    not unprecedented... http://geekflavor.com/files/2009/01/wdw_sw_poster1.jpg I was there during star wars weekend last year.

    --
    There Can Be Only One...
  22. Re:Star Wars: Episode 7... by mschaffer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Star Wars VII: A New New Hope

  23. "Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by DontScotty · · Score: 4, Funny

    It couldn't get any worse -

    Holy Conception for Anakin?

    Jedi's who are ruling the muther-phkin galaxy not realizing that one who will "bring balance to the force" would knock them down because at that time - it was out of balance - the GOOD side was winning!

    And, Greedo shooting first?

    These three things are a quick list to explain why an infant in a diaper scrawling on a wall with their own excrement could form a better Star Wars narrative than Lucas.

    1. Re:"Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Holy Conception for Anakin?

      Unholy, actually. Darth Plagueis created him from midiclorians, so he was intended to be a soulless bastard who would replace Sidious/Palpatine from the get-go. Palpatine recognized him for what he was after having already slain Plagueis and worked to corrupt him (it didn't take much pushing to make him slaughter innocents).

    2. Re:"Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      Holy Conception for Anakin?

      Unholy, actually. Darth Plagueis created him from midiclorians, so he was intended to be a soulless bastard who would replace Sidious/Palpatine from the get-go. Palpatine recognized him for what he was after having already slain Plagueis and worked to corrupt him (it didn't take much pushing to make him slaughter innocents).

      Which just goes to show that midiclorians are a gateway drug to things one might consider...unnatural.

    3. Re:"Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      The desired balance was between the living force (Qui-Gonesque) and the cosmic force (Yodaesque), not good and evil, sheesh.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:"Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by SirWhoopass · · Score: 1

      My problem with the birth of Anakin is that Lucas wimped out on it and created the midiclorians to cover it.

      A great hero being conceived by the gods is a common theme in mythology. Either through diety-on-human sex (Zeus style) or divine conception, depending on how directly the culture viewed their interaction with the gods.

      In keeping with the Campbell-greatest-hits-of-myth tradition he'd used before, Lucas wanted that for Anakin. But the whole immaculate conception idea would have been a hard sell to a society where a significant segment doesn't see how their particular flavor of divine myth parallels all the others in history. So he had to cover his ass with a psuedo-science angle for the Force.

      It should have been, "Anakin was conceived by the Force" and left at that. Then we wouldn't have had midiclorians at all.

    5. Re:"Starting from -infinity, got nothing to lose" by hetfield · · Score: 1

      Jedi's who are ruling the muther-phkin galaxy not realizing that one who will "bring balance to the force" would knock them down because at that time - it was out of balance - the GOOD side was winning!

      Not sure where this became a bad plot device. I think the biggest problem with the original trilogy was that the Jedi were made out to be intellectually infallible (Obi Wan and Yoda), and the best (only good?) part of the new trilogy was the realization of the concept that the Jedi were a diverse group of sentient life forms, some of whom suffered from the same illusions of grandeur, ignorance, or poor decision making as non-Jedi. The Jedi pre-Clone War were self-absorbed and so dependent on the Force telling them everything, they failed to actually observe their surroundings; other than Obi-Wan and Yoda, of course, who could tell something was up but just didn't understand the magnitude.

      This same concept is found all through other Star Wars lore.

  24. Care I not by paiute · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is no try - there is only yawn.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  25. Big No! by Linsaran · · Score: 1

    This is all I have to say on the subject of more Star Wars films.

    --
    In a bit of shameless internet panhandling, I accept Litecoin Donations at Lbd2oH9QsthD1GfuUXPyka12YxvWJYnBVf
  26. Irony by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in 1979 Disney produced a film called "The Black Hole". As a 10 year old I actually really liked the movie when I saw it back in the early 80s (on the newly-created Disney Channel of course), but it was considered one of Disney's biggest movie flops. It was pretty much a blatant rip-off of Star Wars, and was certainly an attempt to try and cash in on the huge popularity of Star Wars. The film had all the basic pieces - spaceships, laser guns, "ESP" kind of extrasensory stuff going on (aka The Force), and of course Robots.

    So now, 33 years later, it looks like Disney finally got the real thing. The actual Star Wars franchise.

    On a different note, I can't help but wonder if Lucas is in poor health. He always hated Hollywood, and despised studios having any control over his creative process. So for him to sell his own film company, which he built from scratch, to a major studio goes against everything he's said and done for decades.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Irony by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      On a different note, I can't help but wonder if Lucas is in poor health. He always hated Hollywood, and despised studios having any control over his creative process. So for him to sell his own film company, which he built from scratch, to a major studio goes against everything he's said and done for decades.

      Let's hope that's it, and he's not just acquiring a bunch of money and free time to go retroactively ruin THX1138 and American Graffiti.

      .

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    2. Re:Irony by darronb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have "The Black Hole", and watched as a kid too. To qualify as a blatant rip-off, I'd think the movies would have to be at least somewhat similar.

      While technically the common items you mention are present in both... they are extremely different in presentation. There MAY be points where running away from stormtroopers in the death star could be similar to running away from Max in that huge ship... I don't really see much in common here.

      Could "The Black Hole" be an attempt to capitalize on the interest in space Star Wars, etc created? Sure, it's possible. That doesn't make it a rip off. They're not remotely similar in feel at all.

      The Black Hole gave me nightmares as a little kid (Max's spinning blades killing that guy). I've always seen it as really dark almost-horror film. It's a crazy mad scientist makes killer robots and turns people into freakish automatons. That's a little different than a rough group of rebels fighting a galactic empire.

      Heck, Phantasm feels more like "The Black Hole" to me than Star Wars does. That may be the scarred little kid in me talking, though. ;)

    3. Re:Irony by Abreu · · Score: 1

      The Black Hole (save it's weird-ass ending) was a great film.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    4. Re:Irony by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      He only really made one of the original three movies. Empire? Jedi? He neither wrote nor directed those ones.

    5. Re:Irony by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The last scene of the robot Maximilian and Reinhardt joined into a single being in Hell was a pretty damned harrowing end, probably the darkest of just about any Disney-branded film.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Irony by MangoCats · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't need to be in poor health to take a $4B payday.

    7. Re:Irony by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      On a different note, I can't help but wonder if Lucas is in poor health

      He's pissed off because everyone keeps bitching at him. Nobody liked the Star Wars prequels, nobody liked Indiana Jones 4 (a.k.a. Indiana Jones and the kingdom of just how stupid do they think we are?), and Red Tails. He's declared he's going back to directing art films.

      My opinion is that the Star Wars prequels not only showed that Lucas was making it up as he went along for the prequels, but in episodes 4-6 too. All that wondering about why Obi Wan would lie to Luke about Darth Vader killing his father? It's because Lucas pulled it out of his ass because he needed to make another movie after Star Wars was a hit and wanted some sort of continuity and dramatic tension to bring the characters together. Meh, he's still brilliant in terms of special effects, etc., it's just a pity he could never recognize that he should work with someone to get less silly storylines.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    8. Re:Irony by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Um, The Black Hole had far less in common with Star Wars than with a lot of older sci-fi movies (particularly 50s stuff). It was certainly an attempt to try to cash in on the renewed popularity of sci-fi in the theater with big flash special effects, but calling it "a blatant rip-off of Star Wars" is utterly absurd...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:Irony by geoffball · · Score: 1

      There were a couple other movies raking in the $$$ in the late 70s to justify jumping on the "sci-fi" bandwagon. Close Encounters and Alien both jump to mind. There was money to be made in that "genre".

    10. Re:Irony by unitron · · Score: 1

      "So now, 33 years later, it looks like Disney finally got the real thing. The actual Star Wars franchise."

      Yeah, but they're going to have to make this one without Borgnine.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:Irony by bomb_number_20 · · Score: 1

      I had the same reaction when I was a kid and saw The Black Hole. I own it today, and I fully agree it really is a dark sci-fi movie; it's one of my favorites.

      Honestly, I prefer it over Star Wars.

      As an aside, did anyone else notice that in Tron 2, when Flynn's son first enters the virtual world, makes his way onto the 'command ship' and meets (I think) CLU for the first time that the command room looks exactly like the command room on the Cygnus from the Black Hole? The little pods sunken into the floor and the ledge going around the edge? Is it the same set? I always sort of wondered if that was a nod to the other movie.

      --
      That's ok, Jesus likes me anyway.
    12. Re:Irony by Tragedy4u · · Score: 1

      The Black Hole was "Faust" in space, I didn't really see it as a Star Wars rip-off. Also Maxamillion was far more terrorfying to me as a kid than Darth Vader ever was, a cold, unstoppable, silent killer robot that got up close and personal that would eviscerate you with spinning ginsu blades! The ending was totally surreal art-school with biblical overtones and space-opera mixed in, I'm shocked Disney even let that film through.

    13. Re:Irony by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      The Black Hole was actually a pretty dark film so my guess at why it failed at the time was that it really wasn't good for kids. I watched it recently and it stands up reasonably well. I watched the first three Star Wars films fairly recently and guess what? They stood up reasonably well - with the emphasis on reasonably!

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    14. Re:Irony by Trogre · · Score: 1

      The Black Hole gave me nightmares as a little kid (Max's spinning blades killing that guy). I've always seen it as really dark almost-horror film.

      So it's not just me... good to know.

      That, and the big dog in The Neverending Story.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  27. I'm Optimistic by seepho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can anyone not be pleased by this news? Any nerd I've ever interacted with had already written off any new Star Wars movies coming out of Lucasfilm. Even if the new movies are somehow worse than the prequel trilogy, it's not like we were expecting anything good. The only thing that could change my view of the franchise would be if Disney could breath some new life into it and make something worth watching.

    1. Re:I'm Optimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Well, the good thing is: George will stop messing with the original trilogy.
      The bad: If Disney feels like messing around with the films, the company will probably outlive George Lucas by many years.

      btw: Han shot first!

    2. Re:I'm Optimistic by seepho · · Score: 2

      I've always been of the mentality that no matter how many times Lucas messed with the old films, it didn't change how much I enjoyed the unmodified versions.

    3. Re:I'm Optimistic by jigamo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Disney has confirmed plans for a new trilogy (Episodes 7-9), and the movies are currently in "early stage development." They're looking to release a movie every other year, with 2015, 2017, and 2019 as the current target dates.

      I'm personally rooting for expanding into some of Timothy Zahn's books as they move beyond those. I wonder how they'll treat the Extended Universe?

      --
      Save money on your cell phone bill: Republic Wireless
    4. Re:I'm Optimistic by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      That's why Lucas made sure no new fans could ever purchase the unmodified version or enjoy those unmodified versions in hi-def.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    5. Re:I'm Optimistic by suutar · · Score: 1

      But my unmodified DVDs are definitely treasured :)

    6. Re:I'm Optimistic by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Well... there's all the SW novels they can recreate, most aren't that great though. I'm neutral on this move as long as SW7 isn't animated... not sure if we really need a SW7... the new trilogy complemented the old one, but seriously lost steam around ep. 3.

    7. Re:I'm Optimistic by XaXXon · · Score: 2

      There aren't any officially sanctioned original DVDs. The best you can get are the laserdiscs or LD rips of the standard definition version.

    8. Re:I'm Optimistic by icebraining · · Score: 1

      That didn't stop me from enjoying Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition (ahem).

    9. Re:I'm Optimistic by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Disney has confirmed plans for a new trilogy (Episodes 7-9), and the movies are currently in "early stage development." They're looking to release a movie every other year, with 2015, 2017, and 2019 as the current target dates.

      I'm personally rooting for expanding into some of Timothy Zahn's books as they move beyond those. I wonder how they'll treat the Extended Universe?

      Pirates of Coruscant

      Johnny Depp as Luke Skywalker - you heard it here first.

      First Sandy as a disaster, now this.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    10. Re:I'm Optimistic by asdf7890 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a couple of people/groups out there who are trying to take the highest quality versions and mix out all the changes. "Harmy's STAR WARS Despecialized Edition" is said to be the best by far at the moment - available on most moderately disreputable trackers.

    11. Re:I'm Optimistic by jythie · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people were unhappy with Lucas, but I am a bit concerned at how much faith people are putting in Disney here. This is Disney were are talking about.. the media company that practically pioneered the 'throw in a furry comic relief side kick' and 'when all else fails, sex it up' patterns.... and often exemplifies design by committee...

      New life would be nice, but this particular acquisition gives me cause for alarm... esp given the pattern in sci-fi movies lately. Expect lots of explosions, shallow characters, and a return to the old 'women are either helpless victims' or 'over-sexed independent bad-ass who still need to be rescued by the real man' tropes.

    12. Re:I'm Optimistic by YukariHirai · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh, yes there are. Or were, at least. They were "bonus discs" with one of the Special Edition DVD releases, but they were officially sanctioned DVDs of the original theatrical cuts. Episode IV was even just plain Star Wars in the opening text.

    13. Re:I'm Optimistic by seepho · · Score: 1

      So if that's the case, the new Lucasfilm will continue to churn out movies you don't enjoy, just like the current Lucasfilm. Nothing will change, except Lucas' money room will be filled with actual money instead of Jorg Sacul figures.

    14. Re:I'm Optimistic by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There was a time, long ago, when Disney was a pretty innovative company, when its animation was state of the art and even its live action films were at least somewhat amusing. From Eisner onward it's been downhill.

      Mind you, the above could apply to Lucas as well.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:I'm Optimistic by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it more likely that the villains that run Disney will shut the whole expanded universe down. Lucas didn't mind it, because it kept Star Wars going while he was busy with other things. But Disney, they're going to capitalize the living fuck out of the whole thing, and that means anyone writing expanded universe material is likely going to meet a nice new gatekeeper, and watch out all you fanfic guys, Disney will tip you upside and down and shake you for whatever loose change you have.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    16. Re:I'm Optimistic by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's fucking DISNEY. The reason the copyright extension act was called (more appropriately) the Mickey Mouse Protection Act. Disney puts their stupid movies in "the vault" after a short run on shelves. (Saving them for "a generation" or some other marketspeak nonsense)... They pretty much emptied the Public Domain like a hemophiliac hooker in Queens. They also have been one of the largest herpe-stained-pricks when it comes to copyright tomfoolery and outright thievery. They love DRM. The kind of DRM that makes Yoda say "shit, this is."

      Truth be told, we didn't NEED another Star Wars movie (not Indiana Jones either), and with a few glaring exceptions the Clone Wars TV series has been pretty good... I mean, they reboot Star Trek every few decades, why not let Disney yank their collective puds and splooge out some new restarted Star Wars "adventure" with fuzzy bunnies and fucking MUSICAL NUMBERS. They put fucking musical numbers in ALL their animation. Hell, they do it to live action!

      Mark my words.... Episode 7 will be all goddamned Ewoks. And Chewbacca will have a perm and PTSD from the final battle. Then we have to have the token black guy/chick... forget Billy Dee Williams. We're getting Will Smith or his bratty little kid. C3P0 will finally come out of the closet and admit he's been taking it up the exhaust pipe from IG-88 for years. R2D2 will be turned into a karaoke machine.... Luke will become a homeless religious nut while Han Solo and Leia will have 6 kids on galactic welfare... and the evil Ritt Momney will threaten to close the youth center Han and Leia run unless the duo can field a tiddlywinks team in time for the big tournament on Yaavin IV. Meanwhile, the Emperor's clones will become the universe's ugliest choir.

      Now I know the franchise is truly dead. Thank goodness I got it on Blu Ray before Disney got their slimy dickskinners on the franchise. Disney fucked the Muppets... (I believe they killed Henson because he was having second thoughts on the sale... ok, so I made that up... but Disney's fucking evil!)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    17. Re:I'm Optimistic by TWX · · Score: 5, Informative

      But they're matted widescreen Laserdisc rips. They're literally 4:3 ratio with the black bars at the top and bottom as part of the image itself. If you show them on a 16:9 screen you have to use the zoom feature to get the film to fit the width of the screen, which means that you are only using a very small portion of the 480 rows available in DVD format, as most of the image is spent on those useless black bars.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    18. Re:I'm Optimistic by robthebloke · · Score: 2

      The only thing that could change my view of the franchise would be if Disney could breath some new life into it and make something worth watching.

      Digby, the biggest dog on Tattoine..... ?

    19. Re:I'm Optimistic by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're also home to pixar, now a days. Although John Lasseter is busy, I wouldn't mind if he took over the franchise. He's probably one of the best story tellers right now. Plus, pixar used to be part of LucasFilms so it would be a nice fit.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    20. Re:I'm Optimistic by pregister · · Score: 1

      But, as has been pointed out numerous times already in the comments, Disney Loves Money. How long before there are new DVD versions of the originals released followed by the collected box set followed by the side-by-side comparison version, etc.

    21. Re:I'm Optimistic by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Even better, Disney may choose to follow the current Hollywood fad of re-imagining recent films, and reboot Episodes 1-3.

      The only thing George got right about the prequels is the idea that there should be an interesting story there.

      Heck, anything would be more interested that those 3 movies.

    22. Re:I'm Optimistic by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Your post is the greatest thing I have ever read.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    23. Re:I'm Optimistic by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that I said that we didn't need any more movies... yet you missed that part. Thanks for that. I truly don't know how you can glean my political affiliation from a rant about Disney... you must be psychic. Gimme this week's Powerball!

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    24. Re:I'm Optimistic by jader3rd · · Score: 2

      How can anyone not be pleased by this news?

      I can not be pleased by it if Disney stomps all over the Extended Universe. The only chance they have with me is if the sequels happen after Han, Leia and Luke are dead, or it's 30 years later and Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill hand off most of the movie to new actors playing Jaina Solo and Ben Skywalker.

    25. Re:I'm Optimistic by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I'm personally rooting for expanding into some of Timothy Zahn's books

      I'd like those too, but I don't know how much I'd be accepting of new actors playing the core characters. The original actors are 25+ years too old for the parts now.

    26. Re:I'm Optimistic by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 4, Funny

      I forgot to add...

      "Disney's JEDIS on ICE", "A Very Jedi Christmas", "Zack and Cody's Jedi Adventures", "Luke Skywalker: Jedi detective", "A Very Muppet Star Wars"... "Jabba's sweatin' to the Cantina Band"..... and my personal favorite... "Star Wars Holiday Special 2: Electric Boogaloo."

      This has disaster written all over it. Lucas' new squeeze must want more money. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    27. Re:I'm Optimistic by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just you wait until they do another Christmas Special, then you'll be sorry.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    28. Re:I'm Optimistic by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      I know what you mean... Disney is to entertainment what Microsoft is to software, and yet almost everyone here sees this as something good.

      More consolidation in the media industry is NEVER good.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    29. Re:I'm Optimistic by batwingTM · · Score: 1

      If they do "Empire on Ice" I think they will have to pay royalties to Robot Chicken, it was their idea after all...

      Actually, I would see that, "Empire on Ice" could be cool.

      --
      Leg Godt!
    30. Re:I'm Optimistic by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      unless his company was bought out by someone who cares more for money that his own 'vision'.

      --
      ...
    31. Re:I'm Optimistic by westlake · · Score: 1

      They pretty much emptied the Public Domain like a hemophiliac hooker in Queens.

      MGM built its reputation on big budget adaptations of the classics. Disney had the wit to see that fairy tales were a perfect fit for animation --- and pushed budgets, production design, character and effects animation to heights no other studio could match.

      A trivial search of IMDB will expose scores of significant film and video productions based on the same public domain sources used by Disney. Mary Martin's Peter Pan. Rodgers and Hammerstein's "Cinderella."

      Mark my words.... Episode 7 will be all goddamned Ewoks.

      "The Incredibles" set pieces were as engaging and spectacular as anything in James Bond while making no apologies for mixing action-adventure and family-oriented situation comedy. "Wall-E" is as fine and hard-core a science fiction film to have emerged from Hollywood ever.

    32. Re:I'm Optimistic by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      I know a lot of people were unhappy with Lucas, but I am a bit concerned at how much faith people are putting in Disney here.

      It's possible that those people didn't see what Disney did with The Muppets.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    33. Re:I'm Optimistic by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      You make a good point about other companies being bad, but let's make a few notes here:

      I doubt many people will claim that Disney never made good, inspired movies. They most certainly have, but many feel they've lost any sense of originality. Secondly, I don't like giving credit to Disney for Pixar movies. Pixar is now part of Disney, yes, but as I understand it, they have a certain level of autonomy.

    34. Re:I'm Optimistic by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I hate to say it, but I would go see "A Very Muppet Star Wars."

      Actually, my theory was that we're going to see a new release of Star Wars Episode IV where, in the background of the Cantina, you will see Nick Fury talking to Rocket Raccoon.

      A Star Wars/Marvel cross-over with Guardians of the Galaxy.

    35. Re:I'm Optimistic by unitron · · Score: 2

      If they do them animated, Goofy could play Jar-Jar.

      Which Disney animated characters would you cast as which Star Wars characters?

      To bad it's not Warner Brothers. Tasmanian Devil as Chewbacca and Bugs as Han Solo.

      Bugs in drag as Leia.

      Darth Fudd

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    36. Re:I'm Optimistic by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      They're not the only ones... but Disney wins kudos for assraping the public domain of so damn many things. The sheer volume is not what's the point... it's the sheer shit-ton of money they made off the Public Domain.... and do it in perpetuity.

      I feel Warner Brothers leaped over the rotoscope nonsense of "classic" Disney in the old days of Termite Terrace. Albeit not "classical" animation, their work (Tex Avery, Chuck Jones, etc.) made the old Disney stuff look like Max Fleischer cartoons drawn by an epileptic monkey. It's not any coincidence that they sack their good animators once they got enough computer jockeys to make their movies. I miss the old days of animation (all of the players, even Disney.)

      Disney has been the most vocal at making sure the Public Domain never gets restocked. They want perpetual copyright. They can suck my ass...

      And like it was said in another reply, Disney != Pixar. Now they do, but not the Incredibles. We're up to how many sequels now that Pixar is part of Disney? Why not another Incredibles? (I also agree that is a great movie, regardless of its final home in Mousechwitz.) You know, come to think of it, I enjoyed Treasure Planet and Emperor's New Groove. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    37. Re:I'm Optimistic by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Actually, you might be right. However, only if Pepe the Prawn could be Han Solo...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    38. Re:I'm Optimistic by Sark666 · · Score: 2

      Of course only for a limited time, before they go back in the vault...

    39. Re:I'm Optimistic by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

      The expanded universe wasn't fan-fiction, Lucas got payed for allowing the characters & the universe to be in the books.

      They're terrible drek and on some level I hope Disney does kill the license.

      But I hope they bring back C-3PO cereal.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    40. Re:I'm Optimistic by flowlee · · Score: 1

      Droid Story, Building 3PO, Jabbatouille, A Hut's Life, The Inforcables, Ar D, Speeders, Troopers Inc.

    41. Re:I'm Optimistic by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

      available on most moderately disreputable trackers.

      You mean, available at most wretched hives of scum and villainy? OK, but you must be cautious.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    42. Re:I'm Optimistic by drrilll · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I am trying to think of a downside, I really am, and there are maybe one or two legitimate ones, but seriously. This is a great opportunity for talented people to get involved. And if they screw it up, meh, so what? Have we lost something? Did the Star Wars Christmas Special, or the Ewoks and Droids Adventure Hour ruin Star Wars forever for everyone? The saga has already survived a deluge of bad handling, and it still resonates with people. A little more won't matter.

    43. Re:I'm Optimistic by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm. Does this mean Princess Leia is now a Disney princess?

    44. Re:I'm Optimistic by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      Not quite. They are taken from the same master tapes, but are not direct transfers of the LD video. The LD contained much more noise reduction (at the expense of detail). A few other sources were used for some things, too: the opening crawl and first shot of Episode IV (Tatooine and the ships flying in) are taken from a separate, higher-quality source; and the entire audio track of Episode V is taken from a different source (possibly a VHS master). It's not clear why the latter was changed, although, doing this did fix one audio glitch from the LD towards the end of the movie.

      Of course, they are still 4:3 matted widescreen, with everything that entails. But they do look better than any other release of the unaltered trilogy, and in some cases, they actually look better than the SE (blue tint, anyone?).

    45. Re:I'm Optimistic by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Knowing Disney what they tend to do with The Muppets... Odds are like 95% or better Kermit would get to be Han just because otherwise they wouldnt be able to use Miss Piggy for Leia.
      Not much chance they would do anything else.

      I mean there is so much potential for a Muppet SW given how well some parody takes treat the material. I adored the Robot Chicken SW shorts and the Muppets past humor treatments of things such as Dickens & Treasure Island shows an appropriate amount of irreverence to do good humor with old subject matter. But its the Kermit & Piggy as Han & Leia that breaks it for me. Everything else I picture is awesome, from Fozzie or Animal as Chewie, to a Gonzo as Han, Penguins as Jawas, Swedish Chef as Akbar, the list is endless as to how awesome they could make it. Pretty much anything other than the utterly predicable & tedious to watch Kermit & Piggy as Han & Leia, with the mandatory side order of Scooter as Luke.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    46. Re:I'm Optimistic by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I'd watch Muppet Star Wars.

    47. Re:I'm Optimistic by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      You know what tho?

      The Episode 7 you just described - that's still better than any of episodes 1-3 that Lucas made.

    48. Re:I'm Optimistic by Phydaux · · Score: 1

      Pirates of Coruscant

      Johnny Depp as Luke Skywalker - you heard it here first.

      Pirates of Monkey Island
      Captain Sparrow meets Guybrush Threepwood.

    49. Re:I'm Optimistic by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Bugs as Han Solo.

      Bugs in drag as Leia.

      Darth Fudd

      Talk about loving yourself.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    50. Re:I'm Optimistic by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add...

      Probably got distracted by some kids walking on his lawn.

    51. Re:I'm Optimistic by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

      ... the new trilogy complemented the old one,

      I do not think that word means what you think it means...

    52. Re:I'm Optimistic by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      You mean, available at most wretched hives of scum and villainy? OK, but you must be cautious.

      Make-cheesay. Pa'sa tah ono caulky malia. Ee youngee d'emperolo teesaw. Twa spastika awahl no. Yanee dah poo noo.

    53. Re:I'm Optimistic by suutar · · Score: 1

      At one time they had the modified versions for sale and the bonus item was the original theatrical version on a separate disk.

    54. Re:I'm Optimistic by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Yes there is - they released the theatrical version with the special edition version a couple years ago on DVD. No special treatment but it's on DVD.

      Who knows maybe Disney will release the theatrical version on Bluray!

    55. Re:I'm Optimistic by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Simba as Luke Skywalker, Scar as Vader which leaves that fucking Meerkat as Jar Jar.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:I'm Optimistic by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1

      Best thing about this: The Holiday Special is going to eventually be released now on DVD, then in a 'Special Edition'. Disney can also blackmail Ford into appearing in the reboot - "What's that, Mr. Ford? You're not interested in appearing? Very well. As an alternative, would you like to team up with Bruce Vilanch to provide commentary on the Special Edition?"

      --
      That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    57. Re:I'm Optimistic by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      There is a risk that Disney will fuck up the new movies, but there's also a chance that they will make them good. What are the odds of either outcome? I have no idea, maybe it's 99:1, maybe it's 99.999:0.001. All that matters is that the chance of a good movie from Disney is not zero. No matter how bad the odds are, it's still a gamble worth taking because we have nothing to lose.

      Let's assume Disney does produce 3 shitfest movies full of musical numbers and talking animal sidekicks. What exactly are we missing out on? It's not like Lucas was going to produce ground-breaking pillars of cinema if he kept the license.

    58. Re:I'm Optimistic by YukariHirai · · Score: 1

      Of course, they are still 4:3 matted widescreen, with everything that entails. But they do look better than any other release of the unaltered trilogy, and in some cases, they actually look better than the SE (blue tint, anyone?).

      Though even it being letterboxed is fixable; when I ripped them for viewing on my HTPC, I cropped the black bars out. Problem solved, and still certainly looks better than the VHS tapes I had previously.

    59. Re:I'm Optimistic by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Where were these released and why can I not find them in torrents?!

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  28. Han Shoots First...Again? by mschaffer · · Score: 2

    What if...
    Disney would fix the crap Lucas changed in the first movies back to they way they were and re-made Episodes I to III (especially getting rid of the crap acting by the two young Anakin Skywalker actors).
    Then, maybe, I would see Episode VII.

    1. Re:Han Shoots First...Again? by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

      What if... Disney would fix the crap Lucas changed in the first movies back to they way they were and re-made Episodes I to III (especially getting rid of the crap acting by the two young Anakin Skywalker actors). Then, maybe, I would see Episode VII.

      Episodes I-III? *waves hand* Those aren't the Episodes you're looking for. Move along.

    2. Re:Han Shoots First...Again? by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      What if...
      Disney would fix the crap Lucas changed in the first movies back to they way they were and re-made Episodes I to III (especially getting rid of the crap acting by the two young Anakin Skywalker actors).
      Then, maybe, I would see Episode VII.

      Well, it's not like it'd be hard for Disney to do this. You just remove everything between the 'A long time ago in a galaxy far far away...' and the end credits and re-shoot.

  29. How about... by arctus · · Score: 2

    a re-imagining of the first three episodes (most recently made movies) that still haunt my every thought of a galaxy far away...

    As disturbing as it is to think what could happen to the franchise, its far less disturbing knowing that jaded old Mr. Lucas wont be behind it. Episodes I-III were a mockery of film making and I really have to agree with Plinkett .

    Thinking about it, I'm not even sure who I would trust to continue or re-imagine the series...maybe Peter Jackson?

    1. Re:How about... by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      Four words... Josh Whedon.

    2. Re:How about... by arctus · · Score: 1

      I concur sir, I concur.

    3. Re:How about... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Four words... Josh Whedon.

      The fuck??? How did you manage to mess up both the name and the word count?

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    4. Re:How about... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Why, you think Joss Whedon's evil twin brother Josh Whedon would do a better job?

    5. Re:How about... by zlives · · Score: 1

      made me laugh

    6. Re:How about... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Why, you think Joss Whedon's evil twin brother Josh Whedon would do a better job?

      Because evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

  30. Re:April Fools Joke? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

    In what way has Disney actually interfered with Marvel? I haven't noticed any substantive difference in the storylines. It was grim-and-gritty heroes fighting heroes in annual story arcs that will "change everything" before the acquisition, and it still is.

  31. Re:What's the plot? by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Darth Mickey builds his Death Steam Boat and starts looking for Lucas.

  32. Re:What's the plot? by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Emperor is dead. Vader comes back from the Dark Side and also dies. Luke & Leia know they're siblings.

    Seriously, what's the plot going to be?

    Jar-Jar becomes a Jedi!

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  33. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe Disney can finally release the Blu ray version of the original trilogy? Getting Star Wars away from Lucas is a good thing. Now we just have to see if Disney is a good or bad thing - I'm hoping for good.

  34. Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So does this mean we might finally get high-definition releases of the original Star Wars films without all of Lucas's later alterations?

    1. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by Pontiac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes but only for a limited time before they go back into the Disney vault for a generation or until a new format comes out.! Buy the DVD/Blu-Ray/Digital copy super double Platinum edition today before it's gone!

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    2. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's so 90s. If a single copy of the "limited time" one is ever sold, then the torrents will be around forever.

      "Sell, or do not sell. There is no limited time."

    3. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

      No.
      The originals got ruined by neglect in the twenty years George was counting his Empire's loot. The only "original" copy exists on the LaserDisk editions.

    4. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Vault, what vault?
      With the ability to distribute 1080p 7.1 surround perfect copies in a matter of hours to an arbitrary stranger, I believe the container you're referring to is one that belongs to a curious girl from Greece.

    5. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by enoz · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. Read about how the "restoration" literally replaced the original film. The Theatrical versions only exist in memories now.

    6. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen. Read about how the "restoration" literally replaced the original film. The Theatrical versions only exist in memories now.

      That is a very interesting link, but upon reading the article, it seems to contradict the claim you make. From the article:

      As a result, the negative for Star Wars is filled with CGI-laden modern alterations. When Lucas says that the original version physically does not exist, this is what he really means--the negative is conformed to the Special Edition. Of course, it would be very easy to simply put the original pieces back and conform it to the original version, or use the separation masters and IPs, or simply scan the old pieces for a digital restoration, but I digress.

      And, incidentally, this applies only to the changes made in the 1997 Special Edition release. Additional changes made in the 2004 DVD release (such as the replacement of Sebastian Shaw with Hayden Christiansen in the final Force ghost scene) were done entirely digitally; none of these affect the original film negative.

      As the article notes, fully restoring the original film could be done – it would just take additional work:

      In Star Wars' case, using scans of the separation masters is perfectly viable, and though IPs and Technicolor prints are not ideal for masters they could be usable if cleaned up digitally. Perhaps the easiest option would be to simply follow the 1997 restoration pattern but in the digital realm: scan the negative in 8K, then scan the stored pre-SE shots or re-comp them, and fill in any damaged areas with IPs or separation masters, reconstructing the original cut, then digitally remove dirt and damage, and finally use a Technicolor print as a color reference for the Digital Intermediate created. Such a product would be theatrically viable, as pristine as when it had been shot, and 100% faithful in image and color to the original release.

      Disney has done other film restoration jobs in the past which are at least this complex and expensive, if not more. And while Lucas really cared about his new vision of the original trilogy, Disney executives only care about what will make them more money. And there are enough Star Wars enthusiasts to make a project like this financially worthwhile, especially if the Blu-Ray set was sold at a premium price.

    7. Re:Possibility of original edition Blu-rays? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't surprise me if Lucas actually had the originals destroyed after making the digital remakes of 4-6. From what I recall reading he said they destroyed them in the process as a natural result of re-cutting them. Of course, that doesn't make any sense at all given the transition to digital, but Lucas is also batshit insane. I figure his ego made him do it so that nobody can do just that.

  35. It's a trap! by Tristao · · Score: 1

    Oh, Ackbar you old fool, now IS the time to strike (a deal).

  36. Mickey Mouse and Luke Skywalker... by N0Man74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mickey Mouse and Luke Skywalker will both never leave copyright now. Ever.

    1. Re:Mickey Mouse and Luke Skywalker... by john.willis1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Their journey to the Dark Side is Now complete..

    2. Re:Mickey Mouse and Luke Skywalker... by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      Mickey Mouse and Luke Skywalker will both never leave copyright now. Ever.

      You've made an interesting point. You can kiss the fan films goodbye. The Disney lawyers just took to the skies like the flying monkeys from Wizard of Oz.

  37. Copyright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the biggest problem with Disney getting their hands on Star Wars is the copyright issue. Lucas Film has always been really good about letting people parody Star Wars. There have been endless books, spoofs, homages and fan creations based around Star Wars. Disney is notorious for being dicks about, well everything, but definitely about copyright. If they take over Star Wars then I'm worried fan creations, spoofs and other expanded universe material will disappear under threat of legal action.

    1. Re:Copyright by glwtta · · Score: 1

      May not be such a bad thing - do we really need any more Star Wars spoofs?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Copyright by game+kid · · Score: 1

      On that note, I think an advance RIP to Darth L. Jackson is in order.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    3. Re:Copyright by Trogre · · Score: 1

      It's not just parodies. The definitive version of Episode IV, A New Hope, for example, is Adywan's Fan Edit. *much* better than any official version, no contest.

      Episode V is in the works and looks to be released early next year.
      See here for the changes made so far.

      These are the sorts of things that I am more worried about. Lucas for all his faults has had a very good relationship with fan editors (in a sense of leaving them alone unless they encourage blatant copyright infringement) .

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    4. Re:Copyright by ikaruga · · Score: 1

      Same opinion here. Mickey should be public domain by now and yet not only they trademarked him effectively having exclusive rights forever but they're extremely draconian when comes to protect their IP. That is kind infuriating considering lots of successful Disney franchises are based of public domain fairy tales.

    5. Re:Copyright by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I think after that gigantic fiasco with the X-rated "Mickey Mouse Meets the Air Pirates" comic from the 1970's, it's not hard to figure out why Disney is highly-protective of the copyright on their in-house created characters such as Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck.

  38. :p by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    I've always believed that Star Wars could live beyond me, and I thought it was important to set up the transition during my lifetime.

    So you sold it to them?! Let me guess: Miley Cyrus will be playing a lead role... :p

    1. Re::p by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Oh, Miley Cyrus will be playing something.

    2. Re::p by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Oh, Miley Cyrus will be playing something.

      Help me Billy Ray! You're my only hope!

  39. THRAWN! by raaum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now that he's selling it, who cares what his original "vision" was for episodes 7 and beyond? Grand Admiral Thrawn is the obvious direction to take.

    1. Re:THRAWN! by niado · · Score: 1

      It will likely be a reboot, with new actors, a-la the recent Star Trek.

    2. Re:THRAWN! by raaum · · Score: 1

      If 7 different actors can be James Bond, I'm sure we can find a whiny blond to be Luke.

    3. Re:THRAWN! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      If 7 different actors can be James Bond, I'm sure we can find a whiny blond to be Luke.

      If only Justin Bieber would dye his hair blonde....

  40. Best news ever! by MikeMo · · Score: 1

    Disney is able to produce great movies, like the first "Pirates of the Caribbean", "The Avengers", and others. Any Star Wars movie without Mr. Lucas involved has to be greeted with great hope!

    1. Re:Best news ever! by Melkman · · Score: 1

      Disney is able to produce great movies, like the first "Pirates of the Caribbean", "The Avengers", and others. Any Star Wars movie without Mr. Lucas involved has to be greeted with a new hope!

      FTFY

  41. I only have one thing to say by SuperMooCow · · Score: 1

    Kingdom Hearts.

    On the other hand, I can't wait to see a Mickey Mouse jedi fight off with a Donald Duck sith lord.

    1. Re:I only have one thing to say by Christopher+Fritz · · Score: 1

      Kingdom Hearts.

      On the other hand, I can't wait to see a Mickey Mouse jedi fight off with a Donald Duck sith lord.

      Close enough?

  42. Troll Level: Lucas by jollyreaper · · Score: 2

    http://theinternetaccordingtoadrian.tumblr.com/post/9940304385/george-lucas-wearing-a-han-shot-first-shirt

    That image pretty much sums it up. 4chan can suck his balls. Gentlemen, this is trolling.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  43. Power Rangers by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

    If Disney does to Star Wars what it did to Power Rangers, I can only hope for them to quit while Star Wars is still ahead.

    Also, they should release the sourcecode to Star Wars Galaxies.

  44. Hidden Pr0n by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

    Looking forward to hidden/subliminal mature content being embedded in future Star Wars movies.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  45. JIHAD! by sillivalley · · Score: 1

    ...the return of Jar-Jar and everything else we loved...

    and of course the

    NEW! IMPROVED! REVISIONIST! WANKERS CUT!
    of all the previous films.

  46. Slow death of the franchise by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Has just been accelerated.

    Lucas knows the end is near, best get out while there is still some cash value.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  47. Laugh it up fuzzball... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Wait, didn't Disney do a Star Wars film that flopped and millions of dollars went into a "Black Hole"
    (Granted, I still like Vincent & Old B.O.B.)

    ***

    The Good:
    - George Lucas to not write or direct.
    - Star Wars 7 (maybe)
    - Whedon

    The Bad:
    - Disney's influence on Pixar of dumb idiotic humor, we hates it, we do. (Cars 2)
    - Star Wars 7 (maybe)

    1. Re:Laugh it up fuzzball... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      The Black Hole was made in 1979... Most of the decision makers of the time are long gone.

      As for Pixar, well, look at the full list of Pixar filmes released after Disney bought them (under the "Disney-Pixar" brand)

      Cars (2006, 74% RT)
      Ratatouille (2007, 96% RT)
      WALL-E (2008, 96% RT)
      Up (2009, 98% RT)
      Toy Story 3 (2010, 99% RT)
      Cars 2 (2011, 38% RT)
      Brave (2012, 78% RT)

      So, yeah, they had one crappy film, and two "merely good" films, but they've done a lot of fantastic work since they were bought out by Disney. Cars was mostly made before Disney took over, and after that, there was an amazing run...

    2. Re:Laugh it up fuzzball... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Ratatouille was completed before the Disney purchase. I believe Wall-E and Up were both green lit and in production before the the purchase.

      Toy Story 3 was the first post-Disney Pixar film. It was good, but got a touch outlandish with the whole "burning inferno scene". Cars 2, eh...Mater's Revenge. Lots of stupid Disney style humor without the classiness of the first one. Brave, I have not seen. But the one scene where the woman/maid/whatever she is runs into the wall of the castle was very Disney-esque. And made me fear it was leaning toward Disney's stupid non-funny over play slapstick. (Mind you, I enjoy slapstick, just Disney seems to do it in a really unfunny way. (versus Shrek or Kung Fu Panda)

  48. Let me guess, by na1led · · Score: 1

    another episode of Ewok's!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  49. Re:What's the plot? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Emperor is dead. Vader comes back from the Dark Side and also dies. Luke & Leia know they're siblings.

    Seriously, what's the plot going to be?

    Like Flowers in the Attic, but with lightsabers?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  50. Attn: Slashdot editors by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

    Change the help text for the R2-D2 icon to 'Star Wars'. 'Star Wars Prequels' is just wrong!

  51. Crossovers for Cash... check! by Nathgar · · Score: 1

    I, For One, Welcome Our New Cartoon Overlords!! They were the original source material for the Sith anyway.

  52. I know the subtitle... by dkf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars 7: The Search for More Money!

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  53. Empire On Ice - See it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Empire On Ice

    Bwaaaaack!

  54. Re:What's the plot? by vlm · · Score: 1

    I assume you've never seen a disney movie before? Someones daughter (Han and Leia?) is now a disney princess, and being a young woman her only purpose in life in the movie is finding herself a man, about 8 musical numbers, dancing ewoks and dancing jar jar, the new happy couple sails into the sunset on a landcruiser with mr tall dark and handsome and they live happily ever after, finally licensed pink backpacks with the princess's face marketed to my daughter. Great stuff.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  55. Too bad he didn't decide to do this 14 years ago by neo-mkrey · · Score: 2

    Might have actually had some good prequels made. Oh, well, episodes 7,8,9 can't be any worse.

  56. Re:Dare to dream! by zakkudo · · Score: 1

    Or better yet, the next kindom hearts game can have Star Wars, Muppets, and Marvel characters to celebrate everything disney!

  57. Might not be all bad by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

    Maybe Disney will release HD Blu-ray versions of the non-special edition episodes 4-6. It would save us the trouble of downloading Harmy's editions, at least.

    I'm going to hold out foolish hope for a movie adaptation of the Thrawn trilogy.

    --
    Visit the
  58. Maybe we can get the original cuts back by futuresheep · · Score: 1

    Disney puts out very high quality Bluray releases. Maybe they'll see the monetary value in remastering the original three movies and release a Pre-SE Boxset. As long as Han shoots first I'll buy a it.

  59. I'm pessimistic! by plover · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For 35 years, George Lucas has permitted derivative fan-based works to thrive. He's a kid at heart who gains great personal pleasure from seeing so many people embrace his movies and characters.

    Disney, on the other hand, is one of the ringleaders of the MPAA, pushing for crap like the DMCA and most noticeably the insane copyright extensions. They're infamous for cracking down on anyone who so much as fingerpaints mouse-ears on a poster of Obama without first licensing said use of mouse-ears. Under a Disney regime, I expect to see any post that so much as mentions a "light saber" as takedown fodder.

    As far as extending the franchise, do you really want to watch "The Littlest Sith" or "Sleeping Jedi", or some other straight-to-DVD animated dreck?

    --
    John
    1. Re:I'm pessimistic! by seepho · · Score: 2

      As far as extending the franchise, do you really want to watch "The Littlest Sith" or "Sleeping Jedi", or some other straight-to-DVD animated dreck?

      No, but I didn't want to watch the new "Clone Wars" series, either. So I didn't.

    2. Re:I'm pessimistic! by seepho · · Score: 1

      Addendum:

      It wouldn't be much different than what we have now, anyway.

    3. Re:I'm pessimistic! by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      I remember seeing "A Wookie Christmas" when it came out. I still puke a little in my mouth to this very day when I remember it... The original first movie in 1978 was *it*. After that they should have just stopped.

      --
      C|N>K
    4. Re:I'm pessimistic! by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a bad feeling about this.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    5. Re:I'm pessimistic! by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      The original first movie in 1978 was *it*.

      By 1978, it's possible that it wasn't the "original" any more, as the movie was first released in 1977. But, even during that first release, there were differerent versions (sound mixes, etc.), and there aren't any copies from that era in private hands, so we can't really know what is 100% "right".

    6. Re:I'm pessimistic! by Applekid · · Score: 5, Funny

      The next trailer:

      Scene filled with mist, lamentful orchestration of A New Hope

      Narrator: A long time ago in a galaxy far away...

      Mist parts and slow zoom in towards a small hut village

      Narrator: It's just as hard being a kid as ever

      Scene changes to inside a dark, wooden hut. You see the back of a woman wearing a long dress, but not her arms or the back of her head.

      Mom: You had better eat all those vegitables!

      Scene changes to a shot of a table with an 8 year old furry kid sitting at it, trying to feed his space broccoli to his pet alien dog thing.

      Kid: Aw man!

      Mom: Corbin! How will you ever become a big strong Ewok?

      Narrator: Sometimes the world lines up against you...

      Scene set in a schoolhouse. Music stops

      Bully Ewok: You'll never amount to anything Corbutt!

      Narrator: And tries to FORCE it's will upon you

      Scene shot goes wider, and bully Ewok knocks the books out of Corbin's hand and all his fellow classmates point and laugh.

      Scene changes to a shot of Corbin on his bed playing with his pet alien.

      Corbin: I wish I could be a hero like uncle Skywalker...

      Pans to a framed picture portrait on his desk showing a pregnant Ewok standing and smiling next to Luke and Leia.

      Narrator: Until the littlest Ewok found his place in the universe

      Song changes to Every Little Thing She Does Is Magic

      Scene changes to the forest, and a smaller, pinker version of Jar Jar Binks shows her head out from behind a tree.

      Car Car: Hi, meesah Car Car!

      Laughing while they run through the trees, splash in rivers, meet Chewbacca's kid, etc etc etc

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    7. Re:I'm pessimistic! by mrbluze · · Score: 2

      For 35 years, George Lucas has permitted derivative fan-based works to thrive. He's a kid at heart who gains great personal pleasure from seeing so many people embrace his movies and characters.

      George Lucas permitted his Star Wars genre to be degraded into one with soap opera level plot and thinly veiled product placement at every turn once he embarked on episodes 1,2 and 3. He has made as much money as he possibly can from his success. That's not being a 'kid at heart', but a shrewd businessman. Star was episodes 4-6 (in descending order) are groundbreaking works, but he is no Asimov! Disney will make a Mattel Movie out of Star Wars, you've got that right!

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    8. Re:I'm pessimistic! by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      Empire > New Hope

    9. Re:I'm pessimistic! by deniable · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Iron Man v. Boba Fett is more likely.

    10. Re:I'm pessimistic! by jjp9999 · · Score: 2

      Speaking of which, George, we liked Boba Fett... until you made 10 million of them and stuffed them into a terrible, terrible film.

    11. Re:I'm pessimistic! by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      The mono sound mix was finished last, and Lucas is on the record from that time saying it was the most complete. There is at least one fan DVD that contains this mix (where he got it from, I have no idea). Too bad it's..mono! :/

    12. Re:I'm pessimistic! by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      While I look forward to seeing what Disney will do with the franchise. I agree, Lucas has been one of the more fan friendly producers, while Disney is just the opposite. We'll have to see how it plays out.

    13. Re:I'm pessimistic! by plover · · Score: 1

      You think "focus testing" would have improved the movies? Jar Jar may have been awful to some people (he never riled me up the way he seemed to bother other people) but I can't think of a better way to make a movie worse than to have a committee of slashdotters approve it. We'd get into year long arguments about whether or not battle droidekars are self balancing, and do they really require legs for stability if they can control their mass distribution for transportation, One author, one vision, make the movie.

      I think the problem so many fans had with the prequels is that they forget they were children when they saw the original movies for the first time. Some of us saw them in theaters as younger adults or teenagers, but most saw them on video as younger kids. What was appealing to a 10 year old boy is different than what appeals to a 25 year old man, yet Lucas made all of his movies with that 10 year old boy audience in mind. He didn't "damage the franchise"; you just grew up.

      --
      John
    14. Re:I'm pessimistic! by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

      I totally would watch a new ewoks cartoon made by Disney.

  60. buncha depraved mammon worshippers by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Like they'll sell out more than Lucas?

    Disney, please stop raping our childhoods.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:buncha depraved mammon worshippers by Belial6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the same way that people who copy movies are 'Pirates', Disney is a 'child molester'.

    2. Re:buncha depraved mammon worshippers by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Thud's kind of got a point, really.

      I've been watching ABC's hokey "Once Upon a Time". It started out all well and good, mostly about Prince Charming, Snow White and the Queen. Then they added Jiminy Cricket, then Tinkerbell. I thought, "Oh well, it's all Disney, let's see how this plays out." Then came the Mad Hatter, Mulan, Captain Hook, and, in this week's episode, Dr. Frankenstein. Never mind that Universal actually owns the copyright on the image of the Frankenstein monster image (the story itself is in the public domain, from what I understand). To be fair, they never did actually show the monster's likeness in the episode.

      So, look for an upcoming episode featuring Darth Vader as another villain.

    3. Re:buncha depraved mammon worshippers by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Years ago I saw a parody piece in Mad or Cracked about Disney running out of children's stories to bastardize so they moved on to grown up movies to create children's films of. The examples given were Pulp Fiction, Schindler's List (not entirely sure on this one), Braveheart (not entirely sure on this one) plus some others. Some how that memory is all that came to mind when I read this news.

      God now I feel old as I was in college working at a gas station doing overnight shifts at the time when I read that.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  61. The end of Lucas' involvement == A New Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is the most exciting thing to happen to the franchise since the run of Episode 3 finally ended at the theatres. I still remember when I swore off paying a theatre ticket to see it, having been burned on the previous two, and then watched it on a borrowed DVD a year or so later. Money well saved. If anybody other than Lucas is involved, there is still hope.

    1. Re:The end of Lucas' involvement == A New Hope by flanksteak · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Episodes 1-3 sucked. With Pixar's influence on future films possible, this is good news.

  62. Re:Wow by niado · · Score: 2

    I always thought whomever inherited the rights to the franchise would make more movies after The Betrayer%^&%Creator died.

    Glad we won't have to wait that long, after all.

  63. Re:I hereby tag this event: by craigminah · · Score: 4, Funny

    Love the tag "noooooooo". I keep this URL handy at work, for emergencies: http://www.nooooooooooooooo.com/

    Always makes me grin.

  64. Maybe Disney will re--release A New Hope, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 2

    ...and in THIS version Han and Greedo will sing songs from Pirates of Penzance together.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Maybe Disney will re--release A New Hope, by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Pirates of Penzance is fantastic, but it has no connection to Disney... Perhaps you meant "Pirates of the Caribbean"?

    2. Re:Maybe Disney will re--release A New Hope, by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I am the very model of a modern star wars smuggler.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  65. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

    Let me give you a political analogy then. Imagine that Mao Zedong ran your country, and you complained that people were dying and it was a terrible government, then in response they installed Hitler. Do you get it now?

  66. Obligatory by jimmifett · · Score: 1

    Threepio said it best...

    We're Doomed!

  67. Re:What's the plot? by staalmannen · · Score: 1

    Emperor is dead. Vader comes back from the Dark Side and also dies. Luke & Leia know they're siblings.

    Seriously, what's the plot going to be?

    There was basically a plot clue in Episode 6. Luke's hand had turned black. He succumbed to rage while defeating his father (using the "dark side", taking the first steps). Basically he will rediscover the ways of the Sith while Leia becomes the "mother" of a new order of Jedi.

  68. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    You hate it when Lucas made the original trilogy - the idea being that he sucks at making movies.

    We liked the original trilogy: particularly the parts he didn't direct. It's the prequels that sucked ass.

  69. Weighing the good and bad... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The good:

    * New movie made with someone who has a fresher vision. By far the best of the three most recent Star Wars movies was not any of the movies, but the 1st "Clone Wars" which set everything up story-wise for Ep3. I would have loved to see all of the Star Wars movies made by the guys who did Clone Wars...

    * Even better Star Wars related things at Disney World/Land, which was already doing pretty well with the revised Star Tours.

    * I would say even more Star Wars toys, but - is that possible?

    The (potentially) bad:

    * Lucas has actually been really tolerant of fan made stuff like videos and other things. Will Disney retain this same level of tolerance? It seem unlikely.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  70. Barf by gooner666 · · Score: 1

    Barf

    --
    Lets get this over with... Fuck Off
  71. Re:April fools? by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

    Honestly, I think all the geek scorn after the prequels came out broke him. He's not a young man and between Star Wars and Indiana Jones, I honestly think he believed his own hype as a genius film-maker. So in an act of total hubris, he decided to puke out the prequels. And they were awful. And he knows it but doesn't know *why*.

  72. I'm not sure how I feel about this... by DRMShill · · Score: 1

    I think I'll choose to be optimistic. Look at all the Star Wars novels. It's a huge universe with lots of stories to tell. Disney easily has a lot of material to release a new movie every few years. Also, how it anything they make possibly be worse than Attack of the Clones?

    1. Re:I'm not sure how I feel about this... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Also, how it anything they make possibly be worse than Attack of the Clones?

      By making something as good as The Phantom Menace.

  73. Re:This better be a joke. by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

    I would pay to see that. "Steam-Boat Star Destroyer"? Sign me up!

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. dead horse by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

    This is one step further than kicking the dead horse. Surely necrophilia laws have to kick in now.

  76. Re:Star Wars: Episode 7... by dcrisp · · Score: 2

    Star Wars VII: Still Hoping ?

  77. Re:Dare to dream! by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

    I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  78. at first I was appalled by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    But then I thought, with Lucas not directing, maybe a new Star Wars film would be watchable.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:at first I was appalled by overshoot · · Score: 1

      maybe a new Star Wars film would be watchable.

      Well, we could hope that there's something like the Star Trek odd/even rule, except three at a time.

      --
      Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    2. Re:at first I was appalled by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      maybe a new Star Wars film would be watchable.

      Well, we could hope that there's something like the Star Trek odd/even rule, except three at a time.

      That works for me!

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  79. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    crap, i meant "first" trilogy as in "1-3". argh. that's gonna create some confusion. wish i could edit that. brace myself... responses are coming.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  80. Please pleasepleasepleasePLEASE! by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    "Star Wars Hanukkah Special!"

    That Harvey Korman muppet was so lifelike!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  81. Re:April fools? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine GL giving up his crown jewel and letting others play in his sandbox

    Lucas is staring down age 70 (he'll be 69, dude, next year). He may be ready to take his billions and retire, passing the reins to someone else. The ears are as good a choice as any.

  82. NOOOOOOOO by __aasehi2499 · · Score: 1

    It was all over, there was a finality to it, I never had to be subjected to it ever again, why must we suffer the Star Wars Epic Space Pooh, over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over

    Might be a runaway multi-line "" string starting in 1977

  83. I MEANT PREQUEL TRILOGY WHEN I SAID ORIGINAL TRILO by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    brace myself... corrective responses are coming

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  84. Re:Jedi Town coming to Disneyland by KeithJM · · Score: 1

    Have you ever ridden the Star Tours ride? It's far more cheesy than that. Seriously. Pee Wee Herman does the voice work, and George Lucas makes a cameo appearance at the end.

  85. Re:What's the plot? by alexander_686 · · Score: 2

    Google the image "Darth Darth Binks". Makes much more sense the being a Jedi.

  86. THRAWN! And TIES! by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    Now if we can get new versions of X-Wing and TIE Fighter to go with it.

  87. I'm optimistic by niado · · Score: 1

    Pirates of the Caribbean, IN SPACE.

  88. Oh, really? by overshoot · · Score: 2

    I've always believed that Star Wars could live beyond me

    ... and despite giving it my best try three times in a row, it just might.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  89. Two Words by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Mickey Vader

    After Jar Jar it was only a matter of time.

    search your feelings, you know it to be true.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Two Words by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I grok that. You'd think that Luke and Lea should change their name to Vader.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  90. ... and the mask comes off... by swschrad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Walt, I am your father."

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  91. Looney Toons vrs Disney by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

    Looney Toons vrs Disney would be a cool game. Tag team fights between Bugs Bunny/Road Runner vrs Mickey/Pluto

  92. Well this sucks by CaptainStumpy · · Score: 1

    "Phantom's visual effects supervisor Rob Coleman recently told a seminar that he brought his concerns to George Lucas, who told him that he had designed Jar Jar to appeal to small children." http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0171197/news?year=1999 Now with the disney ties, jar jar will become more crapier than you can possibly imagine!

    --
    It will be better to purchase from an owner who is a good farmer and a good builder.
    1. Re:Well this sucks by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      "Phantom's visual effects supervisor Rob Coleman recently told a seminar that he brought his concerns to George Lucas, who told him that he had designed Jar Jar to appeal to small children." http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0171197/news?year=1999

      Now with the disney ties, jar jar will become more crapier than you can possibly imagine!

      On the positive side, we don't have to watch it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Well this sucks by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Meesa thinking I will be mooie mooie great in the Disney Land parade.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  93. Oh no... by Iniamyen · · Score: 1

    I thought it couldn't get any worse than a movie with Jar Jar in it. Now I know it will get worse - a movie with Jar Jar's offspring. Shit.

    1. Re:Oh no... by unitron · · Score: 1

      I thought it couldn't get any worse than a movie with Jar Jar in it. Now I know it will get worse - a movie with Jar Jar's offspring....

      You had to do it, didn't you? Introduce the concept of Jar Jar doing that which is necessary for reproduction.

      How do I claw my entire brain out without that being in my last thought?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  94. Re:Are we being trolled? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is this a troll? Disney?

    It's the Frankentroll and what's worse, it's true.

    Episode 7: The Sandy Storms of Tatooine in theaters 2015, someone alert FEMA

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  95. Re:What's the plot? by CaptainStumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Phantom's visual effects supervisor Rob Coleman recently told a seminar that he brought his concerns to George Lucas, who told him that he had designed Jar Jar to appeal to small children. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0171197/news?year=1999 Now with the disney ties, jar jar will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!

    --
    It will be better to purchase from an owner who is a good farmer and a good builder.
  96. Re:What's the plot? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Given the amount of licensed content already in existence that does not rely on any of those plot points, I think it is safe to say that they can think of something.

  97. Did he really think about it? by SuperMooCow · · Score: 2

    Dot Matrix: Do you realize what you've done?
    George Lucas: Yes, and I'm glad. Glad, glad, glad, glad, glad.
    Dot Matrix: I wonder if he's glad.

  98. Re:What's the plot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrawn_Trilogy

    I'll take your geek card. You can have it back after you've read those.

  99. Not all bad... by Symbha · · Score: 1

    I bet there's a business case for Han shooting first again...

  100. DISNEY IS THE DARKSIDE by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    "Darth Vader betrayed and murdered your father"

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  101. Look at the bright side here! by sehlat · · Score: 1

    We'll be able to argue about whether Mickey shot first for decades!

  102. Re:I hereby tag this event: by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    I keep this one handy, as it frequently expresses how I feel about dumb ideas:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b_EvoZZpj8

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  103. Ahem. by azav · · Score: 1

    Death to Jar Jar and whomever thought he and his slobbering bloated race was a good idea.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Ahem. by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope that Disney does not bring him back, make him talk only in Jive and turn his leitmotif into some early 20th century Jazz.

  104. Re:What's the plot? by antdude · · Score: 1

    He was a Sith Lord in that Robot Chicken one. ;)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  105. Secret of Monkey Island by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does this mean we can get Secret of Monkey Island VI first?

    1. Re:Secret of Monkey Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure LucasArts and LucasFilm were two different companies, although you wouldn't know it from the fact that LucasArts went from making really fun and inventive games to only Star Wars games. Crummy ones at that.

  106. It's a Sequel! by jtalle · · Score: 1

    We open to see Han Solo, fat, smoking a cigar, watching porn on the TV Wall, his six kids climbing all over him. The phone rings: It's Luke. Again. And he wants to borrow the lawnmower. AGAIN. Good Lord, he has a pension just like Han does - why doesn't he go buy his OWN Darn lawnmower? See it in theaters in three years.... Star Wars 7: Revenge of the Franchise

  107. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    You dun messed up again.

    The first, original trilogy was episodes 4-6.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  108. How to make Starwars [episode 1] worse by cjellibebi · · Score: 1

    Just in case Disney needs any inspiration on how to make Starwars worse, there was a discussion-thread on alternatehistory.com about how Star wars Episode 1 could have been made worse - http://www.alternatehistory.com/discussion/showthread.php?t=236784. Some of the suggestions are truly inspired. One of them being introducing some subtle racism and making Jar-Jar Binks a stereotypical black person who only talks in Jive. Also by not hiring John Williams to do the score, we'd end up with Jar-Jar's leitmotif being some early 20th century Jazz.

  109. Re:Jedi Town coming to Disneyland by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Disney already did a Star Wars attraction.

  110. Re:April fools? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Lucas has basically said he's out of the movie business, or at least the big studio business, and I'm sure he's getting a helluva good buyout, so why not? His kids, grandkids, greatgrandkids and so forth will have more money than God, and I'm sure he made sure he and his heirs will continue to have a royalty stake.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  111. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    i was speaking chronologically (in the fictitious universe, not ours) ... also numerically ("Episode $NUMBER")

    I wish I'd remembered how specific I had to be when talking about this stuff :)

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  112. Re:April fools? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    No, The Dude is only 62.

  113. Re:What's the plot? by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    I assume you've never seen a disney movie before? Someones daughter (Han and Leia?) is now a disney princess, and being a young woman her only purpose in life in the movie is finding herself a man, about 8 musical numbers, dancing ewoks and dancing jar jar, the new happy couple sails into the sunset on a landcruiser with mr tall dark and handsome and they live happily ever after, finally licensed pink backpacks with the princess's face marketed to my daughter. Great stuff.

    You forgot the evil sith lord who's:
    a(loved by all the other girls)
    b(ugly and scheming to take over her father's planet)
    c(just plain evil)
    and he has to be thwarted before jar jar can do his happy dance. However it pans out, I'll be happy as long as Jar Jar is dead by the end of it =D

  114. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    If you like something, you generally want more.

    That's why if I win the lottery, I'm clearly going to reinvest it all in more tickets.

    Lucas was very lucky to have discovered Harrison Ford, pioneered CGI at the exact moment in history when incredible CGI couldn't replace a story (see: Avatar), and ripped off samurai movies at a time when that felt novel.

    I loved the original trilogy. But you can see that even trying to improve the CGI ruins a unique gem,. Lightning just doesn't strike twice.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  115. Re:Star Wars: Episode 7... by pwizard2 · · Score: 2

    Star Wars VII: We Need More Money

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  116. Let's do a re-boot of Episodes I through III. by Slutticus · · Score: 2

    Episode I: Directed by J.J. Abrams Episode II: Directed by Christopher Nolan Episode III: Directed by Guillermo del Toro

    1. Re:Let's do a re-boot of Episodes I through III. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Episode I: Directed by J.J. Abrams
      Episode II: Directed by Christopher Nolan
      Episode III: Directed by Guillermo del Toro

      If J.J. does it will start with a time warp of some kind. I'm with one of the earlier poster, let Joss Whedon have a bash at it.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Let's do a re-boot of Episodes I through III. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I'd like Charles Band in there too.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  117. Re:What's the plot? by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    Emperor is dead. Vader comes back from the Dark Side and also dies. Luke & Leia know they're siblings.

    Seriously, what's the plot going to be?

    There was basically a plot clue in Episode 6. Luke's hand had turned black. He succumbed to rage while defeating his father (using the "dark side", taking the first steps). Basically he will rediscover the ways of the Sith while Leia becomes the "mother" of a new order of Jedi.

    Yeah, hands tend to turn black when you put gloves on them to hide your robotic prosthesis.

  118. Buy Spaceballs - The Movie(tm) by ae1294 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't we just get a spaceballs squeal instead? I mean.... episode 7? really? How many death stars could the empire afford?

  119. Re:Are we being trolled? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    FEMA won't be there in 2015 if Mitt gets his mitts on the White House keys.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  120. How about a re-boot of Episodes I through III? by Slutticus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Screw the later ones. Redo!
    Episode I: Directed by J.J. Abrams
    Episode II: Directed by Christopher Nolan
    Episode III: Directed by Guillermo del Toro

    1. Re:How about a re-boot of Episodes I through III? by Slutticus · · Score: 1

      I've thought hard about this, and i think you're absolutely right. Initially, i was more interested in what del Toro's take would be on the final transformation of vader. however, there are too many good bits in Episode II that would be awesome with his touch.

    2. Re:How about a re-boot of Episodes I through III? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      del Toro would do better with the first one. Hes got more nuance than Abrams.

      I'd preffer it to be:
      Episode I: Directed by Guillermo del Toro
      Episode II: Directed by J.J. Abrams
      Episode III: Directed by Christopher Nolan

      Because barring a completely different plot, I dont see how you could weave that many characters together and suck people into the world without being prepared to make an intricate, 3 hour remake of it so the story doesnt seem like a rushed hack job. Abrams would be about as good at Ep 1 with regards to being subtle about the political subplot as Michael Bay. Though... speaking of mr Bay. Ep 2 might be fun to watch his take of. I mean if anyone can make a massive robot fight scene fun, its Mr Bay.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    3. Re:How about a re-boot of Episodes I through III? by eheldreth · · Score: 1

      You know what the funniest thing about Coruscant is? What? It's the little differences. I mean they got the same sh** over there that they got here, but it's just, just there it's a little different. Example. Alright, well you can walk into a movie theater and buy a beer. And, I don't mean just like a paper cup, I'm talking about a glass of beer. And, in Galactic City, you can buy a beer in McDonald's. You know what they call a Quarter Pounder with Cheese in Galactic City? They don't call it a Quarter Pounder with Cheese? No, man, they got the metric system, they don't know what the fu** a Quarter Pounder is. What do they call it? They call it a Royal with Cheese.

      --
      The perversity of the Universe tends towards a maximum. - O'Toole's Corollary
  121. Re:THRAWN! And TIES! by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

    Now that he's selling it, who cares what his original "vision" was for episodes 7 and beyond? Grand Admiral Thrawn is the obvious direction to take.

    Yes Please!!!

    Now if we can get new versions of X-Wing and TIE Fighter to go with it.

    Good Lord, Yes Please!!! And while I'm wishing, how about the X-Wing book series into a TV mini-series?

    --
    Redundancy is good And also good.
  122. comics licensees lose out... again by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now watch Dark Horse Comics, which has had the Star Wars comics license for ages, producing some of the best "extended universe" material in the franchise, helping to maintain the fanbase during the dark time between RotJ and TPM... get screwed out of it, because Disney has its own comics publisher (Marvel). That's what happened with Boom Comics, which was developing a rather good line of comics featuring Disney-owned characters, but lost it when Disney bought Marvel. In both cases, good small independent publishers got screwed by The Mouse.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  123. Re:What's the plot? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

    They end episode 6 with the scrappy rebel alliance lopping the head off a vast galactic empire. Such a thing doesn't instantly disappear just because the person running it is gone.

  124. Get off my lawn! (sort of) by El+Fantasmo · · Score: 1

    I wish sci-fi was still nerdy and unpopular.

  125. Re:Romantic dialoge by Guspaz · · Score: 2

    Better cardboard than CG. You're talking about the sets, right? :P

  126. [cries] by kwiqsilver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The child inside me that grew up watching the original trilogy, with a closet full of Kenner toys, just died...
    Episode VII will be a teeny-bopper musical staring The Jonas Brothers. On the plus side, that would still be better than Episode I.

  127. May the Open Force be with you by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about we form an open-source space drama with open-source characters? Open-source projects usually have StarWars-like names anyhow. I was certain "Ogg Vorbis" was a StarWars character when I first heard it.

    Try this one out: R2buntu. Or Darth Vi-der vs. the Emoks.

  128. Star Wars the show! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe now Disney can remake the Variety Hour show!

  129. Geroge Lucas is a whore by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geroge Lucas is a whore and stole the entire concept of star wars from the Dune series. It's not even thinly veiled, and original drafts of the scripts even had the the princes smuggling "Aura spice" instead of weapons plans. The princess name in Dune was pronounced "a-leia" The producers of the Dune movie even tried to sue lucas for ripping off their costume ideas, which is rather clear he did when you compare the 2 films. The man hasn't had an orgional idea in his life, and the idea that he's now selling out to Disney, the originators of ripping off other peoples work and then repackaging and re-copyrighting it (Check with the brothers Grimm) is the ultimate in irony.

    1. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Geroge Lucas is a whore and stole the entire concept of star wars from the Dune series. It's not even thinly veiled, and original drafts of the scripts even had the the princes smuggling "Aura spice" instead of weapons plans. The princess name in Dune was pronounced "a-leia" The producers of the Dune movie even tried to sue lucas for ripping off their costume ideas, which is rather clear he did when you compare the 2 films.

      The man hasn't had an orgional idea in his life, and the idea that he's now selling out to Disney, the originators of ripping off other peoples work and then repackaging and re-copyrighting it (Check with the brothers Grimm) is the ultimate in irony.

      I would have said "The Forbidden Fortress" meets "Dune". However the Dune movie was released in 1984, while Star Wars was 1977.

      1977 was etched permanently in my brain, I was eight. My Mom finished her degree that spring and we spent the whole summer (4 months) in the UK while my Dad did a sabbatical. We came back and North America had gone Star Wars crazy.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    2. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I know Frank Herbert claimed that Lucas has stolen a lot of ideas from Dune (the novel that is), which is, I suppose, where the accusation comes from. However, other than the fact that both feature a Galactic Empire and a hero with superhuman abilities, there's not a lot in common. Even the two Galactic Empires are as dissimilar as you can imagine; Dune's Galactic Empire basically Medieval/early Renaissance-styled monarchy based in no small part on the German states (or possibly the earlier Italian city states) of the Holy Roman Empire, and Star Wars' empire is based more on the 20th century military dictatorship.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      However the Dune movie was released in 1984, while Star Wars was 1977.

      Dune began production in 1971, stalled and failed many times. At one point the movie was going to be 14hrs long. One of the scripts that was thrown out became the movie "Alien" (seriously) Costume design happened sometime in 1974-75, and Lucas had visited and seen the costumes. The story of the development and ultimate failure of "Dune" the film is almost more interesting than the books themselves.

    4. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Then there is also the Empire in Star Wars, which has more than a few resemblances to the Galactic Empire in Isaac Asimovs "Foundation" Universe, like for example the home planet "Coruscant" which is basically a 1:1 copy of "Trantor".

      I don't think it's fair to label George Lucas a "whore" though. Human culture is replete with developments that are inspirations of prior art. It is only rarely that something truly new appears on the scene, and more often than not these innovations themselves are rough and unrefined. It is mostly the following works it inspires that truly appreciate the idea and make the creation whole.

    5. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Kind of like Shakespeare, lots of stolen ideas done very well(Hey, if you don't think of the new trilogy as star wars movies, they get much better; plus Crystal Skull wasn't that bad!).

      Execution is sometimes also really important. Twilight was original, but the execution? Sheesh.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    6. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      While Coruscant was clearly inspired by Trantor, I think it's a bit much to describe it as a 1:1 copy. There are no domes, for starters.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    7. Re:Geroge Lucas is a whore by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Right, I forgot about the domes. I was thinking about the other aspects, such as the planet being an entire, gigantic city and the political intricacies of the factions that govern it.
      The Wikipedia entry on Trantor actually states that: "Coruscant (which was in some early sources called "Jhantor", in homage to Trantor)...". Go figure.

  130. Re:I hereby tag this event: by kasperd · · Score: 1

    I keep this one handy

    But that clip is not really on topic for this thread. In this thread we need the real Darth Vader screaming noooooooo.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  131. Re:What's the plot? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Heck, I just finished reading the Legacy series of comics (140~ years after the Battle of Yavin). Cade Skywalker, the drug abusing piratical bounty hunter descendant of Luke, is the protagonist.

  132. I wish for Irvin Kirshner now more than ever by landoltjp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Empire Strikes Back was considered by many to be the best of the first three, due much to Irvin's abilities as a director. Shame that he's no longer with us to pick up the megaphone and bring some decency back to the franchise.

  133. Re:Star Wars: Episode 7... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    Star Wars VII: Do The Right Thing

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  134. I can hear Mickey Mouse now by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    "Lucas, *I* am your father!"

  135. Re:What's the plot? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    But the epic space opera story ends there. The rest is political machinations and warfare ("I have to watch episodes 1-3 all over again?").

  136. I'm sure... by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1

    In a few years we'll see this :-(

  137. Re:What's the plot? by Mabhatter · · Score: 1

    The Young Jedi Knights series would be really cute done with Disney. Jacen and Jaina as Jedi Tweens. No cookie jar was safe, even on the highest shelf.... And no fingerprints!!!

  138. Perhaps if we are lucky by Roachie · · Score: 1

    ...they will rotoscope the original trilogy and insert references to Austin.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  139. Heir to the Empire? by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    I'd hope at least for the Thrawn (a.k.a. Heir to the Empire) trilogy by Timothy Zahn. He was an already established writer, and the "pilot program" that showed Lucas it was OK to let other writers into his pristine universe. Of course then Lucas realized he could make boat loads of cash and let any dingbat write a new trilogy--to the point where now Star Wars usually gets an entire rack in the bookstore, just like all that Star Trek rubbish, leaving just one rack for the real Sci Fi.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  140. $2.1 Billion Gross from 2 movies, they got hosed by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

    The openings were nice, but the Avengers is sitting at $1.5 billion worldwide and Iron Man 2 about $620 million.. http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=avengers11.htm

  141. dang by surd1618 · · Score: 1

    Easily the worst first sentence on /. in a while.

  142. Re:What's the plot? by Noughmad · · Score: 1

    In other words, Foundation?

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
  143. Re:We wont notice a difference. by neminem · · Score: 1

    > "Everything about star wars has sucked 100% for the past couple decades to the point where I dont have any interest or even care about it."

    The final book in the Thrawn trilogy, a trilogy widely considered to be -the- high point in the SW extended universe, was released in hardcover in 1993, which you will note is less than two decades ago. While it was certainly the high point, it wasn't the only good series, either; I remember enjoying, for instance, the Bounty Hunter Wars trilogy, completed in 1999. I'm not arguing with your main premise, just the date (I'd give it about 1 decade of nothing but suck, rather than two; even Zahn's more recent SW books have been pretty craptacular, though still infinitely better than the new-movietrilogy-that-never-existed.)

  144. Re:What's the plot? by Mateorabi · · Score: 1

    Heir to the Empire trilogy by Timothy Zahn. There is still an entire Empire filled with grey-uniform-wearing Generals with Start Destroyers at their disposal. Sometimes cutting off the head creates a whole mess. It wasn't all cheering on Coruscant the day DS2 got blowed up, despite what you see in the remastered films.

    --
    "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

  145. Chaz Bono Act by tepples · · Score: 1

    Disney [...] doesn't scare me as much as it used to.

    As for me, that depends on what happens or doesn't between now and the end of 2018 with respect to "harmonization" to the Mexican copyright term.

  146. Re:What's the plot? by csb · · Score: 1

    Nien Nunb runs a wacky Space Pilot Summer Camp
    Bossk's Bad Day (Should Have Quit Death Sticks Tomorrow)
    Three squads of Stormtroopers live in the woods, don't know the war is over
    Wedge gets screen time, but as he prepares to speak, 101 Jar-Jar clones prance in.
    The Senate of the restored Republic endlessly debates the merits of the Dingell-Norwood Bill

    Something with B-wings, lots of B-wings flying around.

    --
    We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone. -management
  147. Re:Money talks by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Nor does he mention the fact that five or six years ago he was insisting The Revenge of the Sith would be the last cinematic treatment of Star Wars. But then again, Lucas has long been known for rewriting history.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  148. Keep Michael Bay Away! by azadrozny · · Score: 1

    If I am permitted one request, please keep Michael Bay VERY far away from this project.

  149. Dark Horse by tepples · · Score: 1

    In what way has Disney actually interfered with Marvel?

    See this post.

  150. Now my wife's costume makes sense! by WilliamBaughman · · Score: 1

    I made my wife a Darth Vader helmet with car ears and whiskers for Halloween. Before it was amazing because of the absurdity, now she's practically a canonical character!

  151. Re:What's the plot? by ad1217 · · Score: 1

    ummm... The extended universe has a lot of stuff after the 6th movie. Some of it is pretty good!

  152. Re:Ha-ha by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I agree that thefirst Star Wars movie was pretty good. I saw it in the theatre when it came out. I have pointedly not ruined it by viewing any of the sequels.

  153. Star Wars leaving Dark Horse? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that Star Wars comics come back to Marvel now that Disney owns both? I bet Dark Horse lawyers are running on pure caffeine right now.

  154. Re:Are we being trolled? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    Halliburton: a wholly owned subsidiary of Disneysoft Corp, Redmond WA.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  155. Always a Bigger Fish by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    Ironically appropriate quote. All this time I tough all those billions made Lucas one of "The Big Ones" but apparently he just wasn't big enough. One day all there will be Disney, TimeWarner, Sony and the disputed territories.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  156. The Song of the Sith by aapold · · Score: 1
    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  157. 2.000.000.000 in CASH!? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 4, Funny

    2 BILLION in cash? That must be a Calamari Cruiser full of bills! Don't these people have bank accounts? Whats the point of paying such a huge amount of money in cash? Does George intend to fill his house with money and perform some weirdo Scrooge McDuck impersonation?

    1. Re:2.000.000.000 in CASH!? by caseih · · Score: 1

      I know you are trying to be funny, but "cash" in this case doesn't mean the same thing as "cash" in your case. "Cash" simply means that there was no stock swap, no payment by way of stocks, and no paying over time. He takes the money and walks away. I can't imagine he would totally sell his rights to the Star Wars franchise IP, though.

    2. Re:2.000.000.000 in CASH!? by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      A money hat for an ego that big takes a lot of bills. Just sayin'.

      --
      -
    3. Re:2.000.000.000 in CASH!? by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I didn't know about this double meaning of "cash" and was seriously thinking that perhaps they were going to unload trucks of money on Georges porch to save on taxes or transaction fees or something.

      But now that you have made things clear, that does seem a bit ridiculous. :)

  158. how about by memnock · · Score: 1

    "fuck no"? I know Lucas can be a bit of a putz, but this is definitely crossing over to the Dark Side.

  159. original trilogy by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    seeing that they will own the whole kit-n-kaboodle(right?), there is a good chance they will release the original versions. they are bigger whores than lucas and sales will be a sure thing.

    --
    ...
  160. One thing no one caught by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    There may be more to this than selling Star Wars. Lucas just became one of the biggest stockholders in Disney. There may be more behind the scenes than we realize. It may end up more of a merger like with Pixar.

  161. Jar Jar and Ewoks together at last by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    I can feel it.

  162. Happy Life Day by Boawk · · Score: 1

    As part of the vetting process, the directors of this new venture must endure the full seven and a half minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXcb7VPw59s

  163. Holiday Special from '78 by xeroedouttwice · · Score: 1

    Imagine an approved/remastered release of The Star Wars Holiday Special, courtesy of Disney! They would most certainly make a sith-ton of money on that.

  164. Star Wars the Old Republic!! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Anyone here would like to see a new trilogy with the story of Darth Raven and the old empire coming face to face together 4,000 years before the older movies? That would rock and would give something different based on SWTOR game.

    At least I could hope right?

  165. Star Wars Musical? by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Disney doing Star Wars? Does that mean we are getting singing and dancing during it? Or is it going to be about Star Wars High School? Tinkerbell is going to make an appearance?

    Seriously, Star Wars was only good for 3 movies, the rest, well, suck dog shit. The last 3? Since I'm not expecting much, I probably won't be disappointed.

    --
    Be seeing you...
    1. Re:Star Wars Musical? by Shados · · Score: 1

      About as much singing and dancing and tinkerbell as you saw in The Avengers, I would guess :)

  166. Wait! by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    I'm hanging out for Star Wars 13: Gungan Speech Therapy

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  167. As of this post, Disney HAS bought Lucasfilm so.. by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1

    ...can anyone who has a good quality VHS of the original, unfucked-up-with copies of Star Wars (Episodes 1 to 3 - note how I use the ORIGINAL number system, you dorks) please for the love of geekdom, upload to http://thepiratebay.se/ right now.

    Slashdotters with original copies - you are our only hope!

  168. Re:What's the plot? by Squiddie · · Score: 1

    That prosthesis looked like a hand when installed. Lucas did have planed for Luke to succumb to the dark side. Then again, it might just be bullshit.

  169. Lucas by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    Make him executive producer, creative consultant or whatever. But for fark's sake DO NOT LET HIM WRITE ANY DIALOGUE.

  170. Why is it a bad thing? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    I read it as "Georges Lucas will stop rapping the Star Wars franchise." Honestly, whoever continues it, it can't be worse. Disney is the company who owns Marvel. They are not doing a too bad job I think.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  171. Re:THRAWN! And TIES! by Ashenkase · · Score: 1

    Now if we can get new versions of X-Wing and TIE Fighter to go with it.

    Please, here, all of my mod points to you. This was exactly the same thought I had when I read the news.

  172. Avengers a Michael Bay film? by Paradoks · · Score: 1

    The battle scenes made sense. How could that possibly be a Michael Bay film?

  173. When is Indy coming back? by kazekirifx · · Score: 1

    Kingdom of the Geriatric Ward, starring Harrison Ford. ...or just make it star his son instead. "Indiana Jones Episode 5"... or his father. "Episode 0".

  174. Re:I hereby tag this event: by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 1

    That is funny, but the dude who runs that site can expect a DMCA takedown notice the day after this deal closes.

  175. casting by Sputnik77 · · Score: 1

    NATHON FILLION AS HAN SOLO IS WHAT GOD WANTED TO HAPPEN. Also: Ryan Gosling as Luke Skywalker, Alison Brie as princess Leia, Christina Hendricks as Mara Jade? Agent Smith as Grand Admiral Thrawn? Michael Cera as Chewbacca? C'MON

  176. I like where this is going by shiftless · · Score: 5, Funny

    Episode IV: Directed by Quentin Tarantino.

    "That's not a moon....that's a mother fuckin space station!"

    1. Re:I like where this is going by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 1

      Or: That's no moon, I'll show you moon!

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
    2. Re:I like where this is going by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No, no. More like:

      "See that orb, hanging out there in space like a goddamn motherfuckin' testicle? You think it's a moon. It looks like a fucking moon. But motherfucker, it's no more a moon than it is a giant gonad hanging out there for all to see. It's a space station, swarming with the seed of Imperial fucking spacecraft!"

      Tarantino is nothing if not overly bombastic and masturbatory with his dialog.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  177. I blame the Presbyterian Church by circletimessquare · · Score: 2
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  178. ... Disney... making Star Wars by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, how can I not be pleased. The most evil company in the world, who totally destroyed the Muppets, destroys anime every chance it gets and even does a hatchet job on its own products like Pirates of Auschwitz, WTF was that movie about? You think you go see a nice adventure movie, you get a scene that would have been censored out of Shindlers List. It could have been a Korean film for its going from light comedy to stuff even the Swedes need to sit down to digest in a movie.

    As for merchandising the hell out of a movie, Disney invented that, they made some good serious movies but lets face it, Star Wars is going to get their cartoon treatment. Remember Pocahontas? Well, now imagine that being done to Star Wars. Not only won't Han Solo not shoot first, he won't shoot at all, the baddy will die (but not to visibly) by some hilarious accident created by his own stupidity possibly with the aid of a bumbling side-kick.

    Star Wars was as popular as it was because it managed to steer a fine line between the "OMG, son, cover MY EYES" of PoftheC hardness and the total fluff of disney toons. You can't veer from it to far in either direction without loosing the Star Wars feeling.

    Jar Jar Binks and the massacre of child jedi's shows this. Jar Jar Binks was to goofy and the massacre of kids so starkly shown removes ANY sympathy whatsoever you might feel for the "hero". Yes, the original Darth Vader blew up an entire planet which no doubt housed billions of kids some gutsy but cute orphans playing with a kitten BUT YOU DIDN'T SEE THIS. So DV was bad but not gobsmacking evil where the only character development you want to see is the character dying.

    The movie "Pirates" with Walter Matthau had the same problem, the audience wanted a light hearted action movie, they got a dirty gritty pirate movie were the lead characters just ain't nice. Real pirates ain't nice and so neither was captain Red. You can argue whether Pirates is a good or bad movie but you can't argue is that this is not what the audience wanted.

    Star Wars is light adventure, the heroes are heroes, the baddies are bad, one of the heroes gets the girl and everything is alright. THAT IS STAR WARS. Not to scary for kids, not to tame for adults. When people claim that of course you don't like the prequels, you grew up from being 6 years old... they forget. EVERYONE liked Star Wars. It wasn't a kid movie at the time of launch. Adults saw it too.

    Some fans have retconned the series themselves. Handsup anyone who thought Boobie Fett was cool... DID YOU SEE THE SAME MOVIE? He is the classic bumbling side-kick to the baddie, he gets wiped in the first fight in seconds. Yes, he does capture the hero, the baddies side-kick always does this and then screws it up, you never watched cartoons before? Yet Bumble Fett is now in fanfiction and the extended universe some unstoppable killing machine equel to Vader. Except why would an equel be so easily threathened? Nah, retconning doesn't need logic.

    This has created a view of Star Wars that is so varied, no new movie could possibly satisfy. It is the reason recent Star Wars games have no lived up to the potential of the license.

    I severely doubt Disney will make anything worth watching out of all this. They will try to wrap a Star Wars skin around what they think sells right now. "Star Wars: Twilight" anyone? Moody Sith in high school? Don't think that someone at Evil HQ isn't writing a draft for it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  179. No we didn't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Bumbling Fett was a the baddies bumbling side-kick who as a plot device captures the hero through inexplicable means and then screws it up. Inexplicable bit, none of the Imperials asked WHY Boobie Fett wanted to be left behind drifting in space with the rest of their carbage? A smuggler has no detector for noticing another craft suddenly powering up at close range?

    The extended universe made "killed in seconds by a blind smuggler" Fett into somekind of unstoppable killing machine... the same extended universe that turned action adventure into 30 something soap.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  180. I have a good feeling about this by antdah · · Score: 1

    If there's anything that could bring more credibility to Star Wars, it's less control from Lucas. Now we might actually see the original trilogy released without all the special edition plastic muck. Or perhaps restored, but not ruined with added scenes and horrible modifications.

    And since Lucas already ruined Star Wars with Episode I-III, I have absolutely nothing against further Episodes, especially since they likely won't let Lucas direct them.

    Sure Disney is known for sanitising their products, but Star Wars has always been pretty clean. I am not worried about that. What does concern me, is that Disney will now control ILM and LucasArts, possibly affecting what projects ILM contribute to, and the contents of LucasArts' games.

    Always in motion, the future is.

  181. Simple solution to it all by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Hire Pixar to make the movie.

    Problem solved.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  182. ... and Pixar is the same as Disney how? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Pixar is the one who produced the movies you talked about, not Disney. Pixar operates very independently from Disney, they demanded to. Pixar does not make Disney movies, it makes Pixar movies.

    And the reason everyone sees the great Pixar movies as being the prime output of Disney animation? Because their own animation has lost all credibility.

    And the point really isn't whether Disney can or cannot make movies, it is about whether they can make a Star Wars movie.

    Yes, they can make the prequels, they proven that with Pirates of the Carribean. What didn't I like about the prequels? It went to wildly from slapstick to hard action (Jar Jar Binks and the killing of the Jedi children) same as the nasty scene with the hanged kids in PotC which just didn't find in what seemed at first to be a action-comedy Indiana Jones style movie.

    Disney had problems with this before, light action movies that tried to seem hard to get the older teens by including nastiness which didn't fit.

    The whole family movie, which what Star Wars was, is actually very hard to make. Something that EVERYONE in the family likes. Disney has made for a while some animated movies were as a parent you weren't totally hating every minute but few adults would see them if their kids didn't make them. Star Wars was something audiences of all ages, with and without kids, went to see. That is something I don't see Disney doing, for that matter, few have done it since.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:... and Pixar is the same as Disney how? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      and Pixar is the same as Disney how?

      Well, this was about what would happen to Lucasfilm, and Pixar was bought by Disney, just as Lucasfilm was.
      It comes full circle, I suppose. Pixar was a spin-off of Lucasfilm originally.

      Disney has made for a while some animated movies were as a parent you weren't totally hating every minute but few adults would see them if their kids didn't make them.

      Oh now, I think the Pirates of the Caribbean movies were definitely movies that adults went to see on their own. The Muppets as well. With the latter, I'd imagine parents were the ones dragging kids to it.

  183. The dutch "Spits" newspaper had it on the front pa by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The dutch "Spits" newspaper had it on the front page, under a headline with said "Hoaxing with Sandy"

    So I thought it was a hoax example... and then it turned out it was no hoax.

    http://krant.spitsnieuws.nl/spits/_main_/2012/10/31/001/index.html

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  184. I have an opinion! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Wow, 665 posts and counting! Did Obama and Romney get in a fistfight over using Linux or Windowss as a platform to study global warming?

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  185. Re:What's the plot? by staalmannen · · Score: 1

    Yeah sure, but you have to look at the symbolism of the scenes. There was a reason why they showed him wearing a black glove. The same is true for another really good scene in in that episode where Luke is hiding from Vader refusing to fight him, then there is a scene with half of Luke's face covered in shadow while Vader provokes him and finds out about Leia.

  186. Re:What's the plot? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    My co-worker and I were talking and came up with Disney's first released Star Wars scene to restore the geek community's faith in their efforts.

    Scene opens and Jar-Jar Binks walks on stage. He says "Hi-ya. Meesa Jar-Jar Bink---" and then he falls down the Death Star's reactor shaft never to be seen again.

    Cue thunderous applause the world over.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  187. ORIGINAL trilogy? by neolithicau87 · · Score: 1

    Well, now that someone has pried Star Wars out of his very much still alive hands, should we be seeing the uneditted cuts of Star Wars in a form other than non-anamorphic DVD sometime in the near future?

  188. That's awesome news by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    Nothing meaningful has happened in the Star Wars universe or its characters since Return of the Jedi. Thank God, now the franchise can be put to good use. And, before you say anything; the novels and comics and kids books and lunch boxes and video games - ALL filler until the prequels (which were aweful).

  189. Re:What's the plot? by cavebison · · Score: 1

    Emperor is dead. Vader comes back from the Dark Side and also dies. Luke & Leia know they're siblings.

    Seriously, what's the plot going to be?

    Considering it won't have the original cast & characters anyway, it could be about anything. Prequels were their parents, so sequels will probably be Han & Leia's kid(s), with an old Luke taking the master/mentor role. There's a whole story around the rekindling of the Jedi, remnants of the Empire to fight, etc.

  190. The REAL reason Disney acquired Lucasfilm! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    To acquire the rights to Howard the Duck!

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  191. Because a Disney film couldn't be any worse... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    So, without George involved, maybe a watchable Star Wars film could be made.

    On the other hand, having seen John Carter, (I was drunk; it didn't help...) I may have to rethink that.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  192. Is the deal really about Star Wars? by Uncle+Warthog · · Score: 1

    Maybe the mouse house is doing this to get their hands on ILM and Skywalker Sound. We all know they're about the money and I'm betting those two generate quite a lot. Maybe new Star Wars movies were a condition of the deal, not the reason for it.

  193. Hopefully not directed by George Lucas by jweller13 · · Score: 1

    After the horror that was the three prequel movies hopefully George Lucas won't be directing this new one.

  194. Standard procedure by chubs · · Score: 1

    This is all in line with Disney's standard operating procedure. Take a series that has reached the end of its watchable life, then make a bunch more movies to everyone's dismay. Pirates of the Caribbean, anyone? The first was fine, the rest were painful.

  195. thung, WABBA, thung WABBA, thung WABBA by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You mean that Korean pillock who, twelve months from now, if there's any justice, will be asking if you want fries with that?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  196. Star wars theme parks? by chidorex · · Score: 1

    Now you will tell me there is going to be an attraction on Disneyland and Disney World that will fly you to Endor on a spaceship, and will sell you Star Wars souvenirs at its exit.

    Wait... did that happen already? No way!

    Well, then maybe this is their opportunity to create a SW theme park. We'll have Leia and Chewbacca characters walking around the park, R2D2 wastebaskets, you name it.

    --
    "On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero." - Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club
  197. Re:What's the plot? by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    I don't know how to reply to this... it's true, sadly. But is it worth dwelling on?

  198. Saddest part of Star Wars VII by Dabido · · Score: 1

    The saddest part in Star Wars VII is when Bambi's mother turns to the dark side!

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  199. Disney Remaster by Randall311 · · Score: 1

    As long as Disney lets Han shoot first, it was worth the $4 billion!

  200. Re:i don't understand YOU PEOPLE and your reaction by Norwell+Bob · · Score: 1

    The original trilogy didn't use CGI... it used models and camera trickery, which is why everything looked more "real".