Slashdot Mirror


Physics Books for the Novice?

cornjchob asks: "I've been a Slashdot reader for quite sometime now, and I've seen alot of Physics articles posted. I've got a good understanding of alot of it, but that doesn't mean there's no room to improve. So what's some good reading material for Physics that will give you a good, solid foundation if you've missed something, and then give you some additional stuff? What about online articles or PDF's for us cheap folk? Quantum Mechanics is another subject area that--judging by alot of posts underneath the articles, at least--many of us could use some brushing up on. Any suggestions for books/articles/PDF's on that? Suggestions on anything pertinent to any of those would be great."

484 comments

  1. Why don't you by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    Look at a Grade 10 or 11 textbook?

    "Let's start at the very beginning... A very good place to start!"

    1. Re:Why don't you by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      lol you had to mention the ONLY grades in my school district without any physics

      I would suggest reading Hawkings "A Brief History of Time" it may be a bit much but you should be able to pull quite a lot out of it if you have some idea what he is talking about

      When I want more information about a certian aspect of physics sometimes I search (on google or something) for a posting of a formal lab that has been completed on the subject. Good scientists usually supply enough info into the lab that you can see whats going on and then you get a real world use of the aspect of pysics in question.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:Why don't you by prismatic · · Score: 3, Informative

      try the dancing wu li masters. (amazon.com or half.com). it is an excellent book for learning the concepts behind classical and modern physics without worrying about the math or the specific details.

      after that, *then* read a brief history of time.

      after reading both of those, if you still want to know more of the details, take a physics class at the local community college.

      --
      Brian Voils
      "A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest in students."
    3. Re:Why don't you by DarkClown · · Score: 2

      what he said. dancing wu li masters is a joy to read......

    4. Re:Why don't you by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      Dancing Wu Li Masters may be an OK book but don't read it if you want to actually learn some physics. Check out Feynman's QED instead. You won't get any crap about Wu Li in that - just real physics without being cluttered by silly metaphors and mysticism. QED is the real thing and yet it barely has an equation. Vintage stuff!

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    5. Re:Why don't you by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

      In most U.S. schools, grade 10-11 precedes calculus. And you can't really understand the physics, until you understand the calculus.

    6. Re:Why don't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not going to get a "good, solid foundation" in physics if you need to ask this sort of question. Mastering the basics is not difficult, but does require vastly more dedication and time than the average slashdot reader is likely to have.

      If you are serious about learning physics, take a course. If you've already had a course, and still need to ask this question, you need to take it again. If you think you can learn without taking a proper course, you can't. If you were one of the few people who could do so, you'd be bright enough to sign up for whatever was available.

      As far as quantum mechanics (or any other area of the subject with sex appeal) is concerned, by the time you are prepared to have any understanding of it you will know how to go about learning it.

    7. Re:Why don't you by gurple · · Score: 1

      I should really think that Feynman's QED should come after a fair amount of layman's primer. That is unless your goal was to impress the /. readership with your versed reading habits.

      --
      -- We've secretly replaced his regular signature with Folgers Crystals®
    8. Re:Why don't you by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      After all, Newton came up with the calculus as a means for describing physics (ir gravity). And yes I know Newton wasn't the only contributor to calculus.

    9. Re:Why don't you by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about saying 'impress'? QED is a book written for the layman. I'd have to be pretty dumb to try to impress anyone with having read QED when I studied from this and this when doing my PhD.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    10. Re:Why don't you by stotterj · · Score: 1

      I would suggest working through a good calc book and then a good college intro physics book.

      They update the editions of these every other year or so, which will allow you to get the books really cheap from, say, '99 or 2000.

      Is calculus really as hard as people think it should be? I don't believe so. The books always start out with the basics and work up. The same goes for the physics book, once you've got the math to understand it--and appreciate it.

      I suggest Stewart's calc book and Halliday, Resnick, and Walker's "Fundamentals of Physics."

    11. Re:Why don't you by jejones · · Score: 2

      I would respectfully disagree. QED is a transcription of a series of lectures intended for the layman.

  2. A great site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.physlink.com/

  3. QED by rnb · · Score: 5, Informative

    QED (Quantumelectro Dynamics) by Richard Feynman is a great (if specialized) physics book for someone who doesn't know that much about physics. I found it to be interesting and quite educational. It also got me interested in finding out more about some of the topics discussed in the book and physics in general. I highly recommend it.

    1. Re:QED by macrom · · Score: 2

      Add to that Six Easy Pieces and Six Not-So-Easy Pieces. They're mostly conceptual books with no problems for you to work. Still, they're both written for the non-scientist that wishes to know enough to be dangerous.

      Outside of pure physics, you'll find anything written by/with Dr. Feynman to be a great read, especially his memoirs.

    2. Re:QED by SIGFPE · · Score: 2
      Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes!


      If you want to learn QM but can't face solving the Schrodinger equation or dealing with vector spaces then read this book. BTW this is the only book worth reading that fits this specification. Don't read books written by journalists or other science popularisers. Read QED. And then learn about linear algebra and differential equations so you can do the real thing.

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    3. Re:QED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Feynman is my idol.

    4. Re:QED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Add to that Six Easy Pieces and Six Not-So-Easy Pieces


      Except those books are just selections from the Lectures - if you're getting the Lectures you don't need them.

    5. Re:QED by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      This is a great book if you already understand classical physics. If you haven't yet learned Newton's laws, I wouldn't recommend it.

    6. Re:QED by gryllotalpa · · Score: 1

      Reached dead end with volume one of the Lectures on Physics with its problems set book.

      To understand unified physics takes a long time. The understandable books are college level books but make a mash out of physics. One should go the the university level with vector fields to fully understand the fish. Say Resnick and Halliday series should be the beginning of a wonderful discovery and excursion.

      Feynman (physics is not that easy as playing bongos in his Lectures) as starred by Matt Broderick was really funny at the Los Alamos project. He later pointed out the weakness of the Shuttle which led to the tragedy.

  4. "a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    (I apologize, but somebody had to troll.. err.. say it.)

    1. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by jsonmez · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Lets end this! Alot is one word. Why? Because it has become one word through it's use by many people as one word. This happens with many words and is how language evolves. A good number of words come about from their improper use, once again it is how language evolves.

    2. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Valiss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well if you're going to get snooty about it, then see:

      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=alot

      versus

      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=a%20lot

      Blah. But I do see your point about how it has worked it way into our language. Even so, it doesn't mean that it's correct (or official for that matter).

      --

      -Valiss
    3. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a lot of punctuation evolution in that there sentence.

    4. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bet you're a liberal/democrat, huh?

      i'm guessing that not because you favor "how language evolves" but because you're stupid for even suggesting "alot" be considered a single word.

      i would also wager you are the product of public education in america.

      dumbass.

    5. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by ottothecow · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      my english teacher just the other day said "dont even think about using alot and I dont want to see a lot on your papers either" something about neither one being good blah blah blah...back to my post

      If you *REALLY* want to learn more about physics, all you have to do is hack Stephen Hawkings wheelchair

      --
      Bottles.
    6. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Dumas (du*ma'as)

    7. Re: "a lot" is two words, damnit! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > "a lot" is two words, damnit!

      Yeah, I was going to suggest that he start with and English book, and read the physics book later.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that logic, then we might as well put the seal of approval on an apostrophe used before the "s" of a plural. That error is seen all over the web. While we're at it, let's just make "it's" correct for the possessive form as well as the contraction for "it is." Oh, and who needs verbs when you could "of" just used a preposition instead? Ad infinitum.

    9. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Squarewav · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      its called common tongue dumbass just as dumbass is a word as in aint and y'all depending on ware you live common tongue changes for example y'all is a word in Texas but not in new York. another example is for computer types , words like CPU,MB,UNIX,RAM are commonly used, ware as computer illiterates will rarely say such things

    10. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by bitusmeus · · Score: 1

      gzblorkin is a word if I use it as one and if you know what I mean when I use it. As far as I can tell, language serves two purposes. Its primary purpose is as a tool for effective communication. In this sense, any use of language is "correct" if the idea is communicated in the manner intended. Alot. A lot. WGAF? The secondary purpose is for people with corncobs up their a**es (like academics and the guy who started this subthread) to berate each other and/or feel superior to each other without adding anything of value to the (world|conversation). Either that or the fascist was trolling for a Godwin. In which case I've indulged. bitusmeus

    11. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "alot" is just a spelling mistake, and you may know what I say if I type: "I write alot rather quicly and sloply" because the meaning is still there, but all the little typos and misspellings slow your eye down and inhibit communication.

    12. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alot" will never be a word. I accept that language evolves, however the concept that "a lot" is bound to does not make sense as one word. It's bad grammar. Language should evolve around good grammar.

    13. Re:"a lot" is two words, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gzblorkin may be a word, but it's not an english word.

      english is a standard, like any other. It has rules and to disobey those rules is poor english.

      like capitals at the beginning of a sentence

  5. Hawkings new book is great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get "Universe in a Nutshell" that's a pretty good one. Also check out A Brief History of Time. I like books by George Gamow (Mr. Thompkins) as well as some of the Sagan stuff. Those are good starters.

    cheers,
    pt

    www.flashenabled.com

    1. Re:Hawkings new book is great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must flame you, the moderators demand it!

  6. Stephen Hawking's Universe by Valiss · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you've heard of him. There's a reason for it: he writes good stuff and he makes it easy to understand. There are many websites and his books are in every store. Check it out!

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:Stephen Hawking's Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only does stephen hawking write and make physics easy for the normal person to understand, he also writes some mad phat rhymes that put all the other MCs out there to shame.

      check out his website http://www.mchawking.com

      be in awe of his mad kung fu rhymin skillz

    2. Re:Stephen Hawking's Universe by zoomshorts · · Score: 0

      Actually, Hawking is really shoddy. Issac Asimov does it better than most and had many REAL degrees to back his writings up. Hawking's Brief History of Time was a waste of paper. He is one circle talking gangsta rappin mo fo. But his grasp of the speculative is clearly superior to most normally confused people. Hey Stephen, we all KNOW that theories are just that, unproven guesses or assumptions. Why did it take you a whole book to say that? Got attention deficit disorder in addition to your other ailments?

  7. Why not take a class? by wikki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure you could take a Physics class at a local community for cheap. You might even be able to audit it even cheaper. In the class you would get hands on labs and other things you might not be able to get just from reading a book

    1. Re:Why not take a class? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if the university is large enough, no need to pay to audit. just go into the lectures. you think they know who you are?

  8. Kaaza by radiashun · · Score: 1

    Do a search for "ebook" +physics or something on kaaza. I've found a ton of ebooks on the gnutella network.

  9. Hawking by sh00z · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stephen Hawking's A Brief History of Time is easily understood by anybody with a high school diploma, and should take less than three hours to read. It'll get you through the classical stiff, quantum physics, and just enough relativity to be dangerous

    1. Re:Hawking by sh00z · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Whoops. "stuff," not "stiff." That'll teach me to hit Preview, even if it means sacrificing the Karma that might have gone with being the first to say "Hawking."

    2. Re:Hawking by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (I know this will prolly get modded down as troll, or because I put this warning beforehand, +5 funny, but what the hell, I have karma to burn)

      Someone on slashdot talking about physics and accidentally making the freudian slip of stiff for stuff. Do I sense a corrolation?

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    3. Re:Hawking by Jacer · · Score: 1

      It's not really a freudian slip, contrary to the popular anecdote "a freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother" that's not really what it is

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    4. Re:Hawking by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Can I please just blame the fact that the letters are right next to each other on the keyboard?

    5. Re:Hawking by Jacer · · Score: 2

      Sure, but this is /. You can go ahead and place the blame on that the first ten people will troll with FP's then around 20% will point out your mistake 10% will call the aforementioned 20 retarded and troll 40% will nitpick at the 10% trolling the 20% and finally 21 additional percent will make up facts to back what they're saying regardless if it's ontopic or not

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    6. Re:Hawking by pi_rules · · Score: 2

      The coolest thing about Hawking's books is that it's really easy to visualize him sitting in the room speaking it to you.

      That -was- intended to be funny, moderators.

    7. Re:Hawking by Spunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stephen Hawking's A Brief History of Rhyme is easily understood by anybody, due to his madd skillz.

    8. Re:Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess no one bothered to view this link or just don't think it's funny. I guess you can make fun of a president but if you make fun of a retarded science icon then it's sacrilege. For what's it worth I thought it was funny, Spunk, so screw the moderators who BTW thought a Homer Simpson quote a couple of posts back was funny but rap site was not.

      You get a 5:Funny in my book YO!

    9. Re:Hawking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The coolest thing about Hawking's books is that it's really easy to visualize him sitting in the room speaking it to you.

      That -was- intended to be funny, moderators.

      It wasn't.

      - the moderators.
    10. Re:Hawking by El · · Score: 2

      The Universe in a Nutshell, also by Hawking, has prettier pictures. All in all it's a slightly better book, although I found it annoyingly non-technical.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    11. Re:Hawking by Nyarly · · Score: 1
      I had serious issues with some of his descriptions of subatomic properties. Especially spin. He seemed to imply it was something like the frequency of rotational symmetry. Of course, then you have negative spin...

      Granted, I've never quite gotten an explaination of spin apart from it being a necessary characteristic of a particle (so that Pauli Exclusion works). I always chalked it up as a subatomic magnetic characteristic, but I'm pretty sure that's just my own irrational need to explain things.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    12. Re:Hawking by LucidityZero · · Score: 1

      The new edition of A Brief History of Time(released two or three years ago) has added two additional chapters, including indepth discussions regarding the possibilities of time travel. Truly a marvelous book, easy to understand, yet full of knowledge. I recommend it to almost anyone I meet.

      --
      Sig.i>
    13. Re:Hawking by brandonsr · · Score: 1

      Also, the follow up to A brief history of time, the universe in a nutshell explains some of the newer theories. i.e. string.

    14. Re:Hawking by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      The first few chapters chapters of this book might easily understood by anybody who is highly intelligent and has a high school diploma. That is not true of the whole book. I first read it as a physics grad student, and there was stuff towards the end that I didn't understand. Some of it describes his idiosyncratic theories, such as his idea of using imaginary time to construct a universe with no boudaries.

      It's just silly to start with a book like this if you don't already know quite a bit of physics. Classical physics is highly counterintuitive, and you need to absorb that completely before you can appreciate relativity and quantum mechanics.

    15. Re:Hawking by _ganja_ · · Score: 1

      Come on, mod this up..

      --

      A journey of a thousand miles starts with a brutal anal raping at airport security

    16. Re:Hawking by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      Cool book. Just be wary of signed copies.

      [-1: tasteless]

  10. Easy by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stephen Hawking: Brief history of time and Universe in a nutshell.

    Very well written, in plain english that anyone can understand. And the ideas in them will blow your mind...

    1. Re:Easy by Ami_Chan · · Score: 1

      While I agree that these books should be at or near the top of the list, and I love them (as a physics major should...), I have heard complaints from some non-physics-minded friends. They found them somewhat difficult to read and/or imagine the concepts. It all depends on your comfort with science. I don't think that most /.ers would have problems.

    2. Re:Easy by Callamon · · Score: 1
      These are both great reads.

      I also would recommend Relativity: The Special and the General Theory by Albert Einstein (available on amazon for $7). Not nearly as head-spinning as I had expected it to be, and it is easier to understand (in my opinion) Hawking if you first read where the basis came from.

    3. Re:Easy by Tassleman · · Score: 1

      The Illustrated version of said book is even better for non-math/science people to follow.

    4. Re:Easy by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Before you think the moderator that moderated your post funny is an idiot, lets just say that informative and funny are right next to each other...

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    5. Re:Easy by MrNixon · · Score: 1

      I like The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene.

      Its about the more cutting edge theories like Superstring and M-Theory. A little technical at times, but the author explains the mathematical concepts in fairly easy to understand terms - and you realize how conceptually simple and ... elegant the universe really is. We might not understand the math required to fully describe this elegance, but wow, is it ever pretty.

    6. Re:Easy by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      Know of any books that will blow my... uh... nevermind...

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    7. Re:Easy by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      The Elegant Universe is one the best books I have ever read. It helped me to understand many aspects of physics that I couldn't quite grasp when reading other books. I couldn't recommend it more.

  11. A Brief History of Time by Nezer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steven Hawking's A Brief History of time is a great introduction without getting too technical. Though a bit dated it was revised not-too-long ago and now includes discussion of the ever-popular string thoeries.

    He does talk a great deal about relativity and does touch upon quantum mechanics.

    Physics is such a deep subject that, from there, you can go just about anywhere you want!

    1. Re:A Brief History of Time by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Physics is such a deep subject that, from there, you can go just about anywhere you want! This is a pun, right? :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  12. Feynman by dirvish · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know how great these Feynmen books are for learning Physics. But they will definelty make you laugh and maybe get you interested in Physics and give you a desire to learn more.

      Definatly Adventures of a Curious Character and also Why do you Care What Other People Think?
      are very interesting. For learning Physics you might try Six Easy Pieces, also by Feynman.

  13. Simplified Physics by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 1

    You might want to start learning with a simplified version of physics.

    A good place to start is here.

    --

    A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
  14. Richard P. Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feynman is great.... Also check out 'Surely your joking, Mr. Feynman' for some fun reading.

    Six Easy Pieces: Essentials of Physics Explained by Its Most Brilliant Teacher

  15. Try this site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  16. Feynman's a classic... by yorick · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first book of Feynman's "lectures" on physics isn't bad at all. The big question you need to ask is whether or not you just want a conceptual understanding of physics, or one that enables you to do the required mathematics involved. Unfortunately they tend to be a different audience...most layman's books have no math, and most college books concentrate on the math...which isn't bad, it's just that sometimes things are introduced differently because of the required mathematics.

    1. Re:Feynman's a classic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Choose the math. Physics is just intellectual masturbation and handwaving without math.

  17. Feynmann Lectures by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2, Informative
    The "Feynmann Lectures on Physics", in three volumes.

    They're expensive, but outstanding and well worth it. He developed them for a freshman level course, so they're accesible and don't rely on particularly fancy mathematical notation.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    1. Re:Feynmann Lectures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are available in .mp3 format as well...check your p2p network of choice...

    2. Re:Feynmann Lectures by ferar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what about the practice ? I think you have to read another book in parallel with practice.

    3. Re:Feynmann Lectures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, these are a great discussion for the technically minded. Feynman was excellent, and this three volume set gets a lot of the basics out in a very intelligent and understandable manner.

  18. John Gribbin by Ami_Chan · · Score: 4, Informative

    For quantum mechanics, I highly recommend the books by John Gribbin - In Search of Schrodinger's Cat and the more up-to-date sequel, Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality. They both give a good historical background on quantum mechanics, and provide a decent background meant for the lay-person. He also has several other books on various topics in science, but I myself have not read them.

    1. Re:John Gribbin by Skiboricus · · Score: 1

      In Search of Schrodingers Cat is a fantastic book. It's great for beginers. As Merc Monnie said, Schrodingers Kittens is more up to date, but I would read that first. Schrodingers cat give a lot more detail then kittens, even though some of cat's ideas are dated.

      Q is for quantium is another great book by this author.

      I really can't say too many good things about Mr. Gribon, he really sparked my interest in the quantium world.

    2. Re:John Gribbin by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

      John Gribbin is by far one of the best authors on "layman physics" I've ever read. Q is for Quantum is an encyclopedia of physics terms (mostly those related to quantum physics and relativity) and is a must-have as a reference. Especially while reading his other books.

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
  19. Hawking ... by JeffSh · · Score: 1

    As mentioned already, there is "A Brief History of Time" But there is also another book he recently did, which is updated and has lots of really Cool PICTURES! :) it's called "The Universe in a Nutshell" its fairly enjoyable for a novice such as myself.

    1. Re:Hawking ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hawking is in the "gee whiz" school. For a beginning physics text, that would be the worst one I could think of. "Popular" science is frequently rubbish, just more examples of scientists turning into celebrities and inevitably saying more and more outlandish things in order to attract attention to themselves instead of advance a coherent theory.

  20. School textbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Usually the school textbooks are really good. Ask your local college's physics teacher which one is _really_ good.
    For us austrian/german folks I can recommend the books by Sexl. But probably you knew this already :)
    have fun learning

  21. Feynman Lectures by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are 40 years old but still a great and unique introduction to the foundations of physics.

    Many of the lectures in mp3 and pdf format are currently being posted to news:alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.spoken-word

    If you can buy them in your neighbourhood.

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

    1. Re:Feynman Lectures by Daniel+Heck · · Score: 1

      Feynman's Lectures on Physics may be a classic physics textbook, but I'm not sure it's the best book for beginners. It wasn't for me, at least. The text is often long-winded (may have to do with Feynman avoiding higher mathematics, but it makes some chapters, especially in volume 3, nearly unreadable), and he covers a lot more stuff than a beginner will ever need (large chunks of volume 2). It's an ingenious book, but it probably a little too ingenious for many undergrads.

      For beginners, I can recommend the books by Tipler and Alonso/Finn. Some volumes of the Berkley Physics Course are also noteworthy, although they differ in quality; volume 2 (electromagnetism) and 5 (thermodynamics) are amon g the best introductory physics books I have read so far.

      Quantum mechanics is a tough subject to learn. Again, Alonso and Finn provide a clear exposition of the basics. Real QM is covered by many, many books, but most of them struggle with the fact that (a) QM is is highly non-intuitive, and (b) it's a math-heavy subject. I went with Messiah's QM book (which includes a superb treatment of the mathematical underpinnings of QM), but I also heard good things about the QM book by Greiner.

      One last note. A book I can heartily recommend to anyone (at least marginally) interested in physics is Black Holes and Time Warps by Kip Thorne. This is easily the best and most interesting pop science book I ever read. (See the reader reviews at amazon if you don't believe me :-)

  22. The most amazing website on physics... by yorgasor · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to know anything about physics fundamentals, check out http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hframe. html
    I've used it to get a good foundation on a few topics and am amazed at how much information it has, as well as how nicely layed out it is.

    --
    Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    1. Re:The most amazing website on physics... by KelsoLundeen · · Score: 2

      Link doesn't work.

      Can you repost?

    2. Re:The most amazing website on physics... by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 1

      maybe:
      http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase /Indx.ht ml

      I am not familiar with this site, but I am getting a page in front of me.

    3. Re:The most amazing website on physics... by ajakk · · Score: 2

      This link is valid, you just have to remove the extra space that /. put into it. Or, if you are lazy, you can just click here.

    4. Re:The most amazing website on physics... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1
  23. Grammar First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'a lot' not 'alot'.

  24. Scientific American by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2

    While it won't give you precicely the knowledge you want when you want it, they do an excellent job of providing solid direction on some fairly complex scientific topics - even for people without a scientific degree.

    It's not too expensive, but they'll do a very nice job of filling in the gaps and provide leads on where to look next for more information.

  25. alternative, but nice correlations by joshuarat · · Score: 0

    Brief history of time, Dancing Wu LI Masters and Nature loves to Hide. All good overviews, with a heavy slant from "classical" to "new" (I.E. Quantum) physcics.

    --
    That tech support that does not kill me...drives me crazier
  26. Physics Books for the Novice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Kama Sutra.

    1. Re: Physics Books for the Novice? by CommonModeNoise · · Score: 1

      http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivi a/booklist.html

  27. You could try... by The_Pey · · Score: 2, Informative
    For black holes, wormholes and some of the more astro related phenomenae, you could try Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy or The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory

    Both are very current and are intended for laymen.

    -B

    --
    Hmmm...
    1. Re:You could try... by theg · · Score: 1

      The Elegant Universe is a Great book!

      --
      Derek Alfonso, Host
      The Power of Information
      http://powerofinformation.net
      National Tech Talk Radio
    2. Re:You could try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree too. I have a MSEE (lots of solid state Physics in that degree) and found the Elegant Universe to be a great book for oridnary folks and _physics_ maojors alike!

    3. Re:You could try... by PeolesDru · · Score: 1

      I agree - Brian Green's "The Elegant Universe" is one of my favorite superstring popularisations. He builds up to his review of superstring theory with some of the best explanations of relativity and quantum theory I have yet read. Though I have to mention that when he gets to explaining superstrings, some of it slips over my head - weird stuff.

    4. Re:You could try... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree, his discussions on relativity (special & general) and quantum mechanics are simply excellent. The string stuff can be a bit of a slog though, but trying to describe obtuse and poorly understood mathematics in plain English will always leave something to be desired...

  28. hyperphysics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  29. What's your math background? by pato+perez · · Score: 1

    Where to start with physics depends entirely on your math background. Got calculus? Got diff eq? You may want to look at some of the better text books.

    If your math is weak--just algebra, for e.g.--you may want to pick up one of the popular physics for laymen or physics without math books. These'll give you a good taste for what it's about, but for the real thing, you need the right tools. Physics is a real-world application of mathematics.

  30. The Feynman Lectures by LV-427 · · Score: 1

    I think the Feynman Lectures on Physics are generallly considered a good overall reference, he seems to have a way of explaning the fundamental principals of physics that is easy(ier) to understand.

  31. Feynman lectures on physics by inburito · · Score: 2

    If you want something with a little out of the ordinary I'd suggest looking at the classic Feynman Lectures on Physics. These books are old but basic concepts in physics definetly haven't been made obsolete.

    Something that would go well with these books are the recordings of the actual lectures that the books are based on. It is one thing to read about it but to have one of the best physics teachers explain everything really makes a difference. If you're lucky you might even find the set of pdfs and mp3s posted somewhere on internet.

    1. Re:Feynman lectures on physics by runtimeerror7 · · Score: 1

      i would also suggest to grab surely you are joking mr.feynman along with those epitomic 3 volumes. feynman is a wizard. he has his own way of explaining things. you should feel comfortable while reading his lectures only then you would enjoy them.

      i dont remember quite well but, if you are looking for some serious intensive basic physics exercises there used to be 2 volumes which i studied in the school. the authors were "Resnick and Halliday". we just remembered them by the author name, sorry i dont know wat the book was called.

      my $0.02

      aky

    2. Re:Feynman lectures on physics by Bobartig · · Score: 1

      Good Ol' Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. It served as a great reference while I was a physics student for several years. they contain a good introduction to mechanics and E&M. Lots of diagrams, derrivations, and explainations.

      For a good book on modern physics, try Tipler's Modern Physics. It's got a pretty good intro to particle physics, the wave equation, and other basic Quantum. All of it's fairly accessible with a strong background in multivariable calc.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  32. I'd recommend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul A. Tiplers "Physics for Scientists and Engineers"

  33. Standard Deviants by cloudscout · · Score: 1

    People with Satellite or Digital Cable or even HDTV in some markets can watch PBS's PBS YOU channel.

    PBS YOU airs a show called Standard Deviants that airs weekdays with a different theme each day. They refer to Tuesdays as "Test Tube Tuesday" and air science episodes (Monday is Math, Wednesday is Writing). It's a well done series and can bring the novice up to speed on basic knowledge from which you can then move on to harder hitting subject matter.

  34. A Brief History of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Brief History of Time, written by Steven Hawkings. Some of the stuff may be too advanced for you (it was for me) but you will still enjoy it, very interesting stuff!

  35. Dude! by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    Once I dropped an apple and it went straight up! I kid you not!

    1. Re:Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote einstein "It's all relative =:P"

    2. Re:Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you were upside down at the time...

    3. Re:Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you reproduce this phenomenon in front of witnesses or, better yet, a video camera?

  36. Astro? by trippcook · · Score: 1

    If your looking for basic, layman's descriptions of Cosmology and astro-type stuff (up to the last few years), Timothy Ferris's THE WHOLE SHEBANG is an excellent book. I was a Physics major in college, with an astrophysics concentration, and I thought the book was superb. I read it before I got into the astro end of physics, but found its explanations of cosmology were very accurate, while being presented in an entertaining, very accessible manner. There's even a comprehensive glossary!

  37. Good Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Berkeley Physics Course and the Feynman Lectures on Physics have been my two favorite books on the subject. The Feynman Lectures are not very easy, however.

    Good Luck!!

  38. Quantum Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While not a textbook on the subject, one of the best "explainations" of quantum physics I have read is Schroedinger's Cat by Robert Anton Wilson. It is a specualtive fiction novel which explains the concepts in a whimsical manner with a twist of strange.

  39. Richard Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try the books: six easy pieces, and six not-so-easy pieces. Both by Richard Feynman. The second one is a bit challenging, but they should give you a good start.

  40. Books by Nasarius · · Score: 1

    It's impossible to really appreciate physics without some basic calculus, and if you're not willing to delve into the math side of physics at all, you'll never understand it.
    A good textbook if you want a serious introduction to physics is "Physics" by Giancoli.

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Giancoli is a good book.
      I used it to home-school my kid in Physics, and learnt all those forgotten physics. Go homeschool some kid and learn at the same time.

  41. Novice books by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    For a really good intro to physics, you'd be hard pressed to beat Asimov's book. Barnes and Noble has the three-in-one volume for under 10 bucks, and it's hardcover.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  42. Isaac Asimov by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Asimov did a nice little introduction to Physics. I found it quite readable.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Isaac Asimov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why did this only get a score of 2? Asimov's book is a great introduction to Physics.

    2. Re:Isaac Asimov by beej · · Score: 2, Informative
      I second this wholeheartedly. The only drawback to his book is that he deliberately stayed away from calculus. This could be boon or bane, depending on your perspective. I could tell there were a number of places where he could have more clearly described the concepts using calculus.

      Overall, I highly recommend the book. All 3 volumes bound into one can often be found in the discount books section at your local major bookstore.

    3. Re:Isaac Asimov by oilfieldtrash · · Score: 1

      Most of his essay collections are in fact physics or chemistry lectures cloaked in anecdotes. Enjoyable to read, the depth of the material is certainly not at the grad student level, but as Bill Cosby used to say "if you're not careful you might learn something".

      --
      ----- Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.
  43. The Elegant Universe by pmcneill · · Score: 5, Informative
    • The Elegant Universe
    by Brian Greene is probably the best popular physics book I've read recently. From memory (it's been about a year), it's divided into three major parts. The first is an excellent introduction to both relativity and quantum mechanics, as well as explaining why they are ultimately incompatible and must be combined in a new theory (quantum gravity/string theory). The second part is a description of the current state of string theory, and the third is a description of where the theory might go (called M-theory). My only complaint about this book, which is brand new given other books I've read, is it doesn't mention the primary fallacy of string theory, which is that it relies on a static background. M-theory, if workable, could fix this, but I don't recall that ever being made clear in this book.
    1. Re:The Elegant Universe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My only complaint about this book, which is brand new given other books I've read, is it doesn't mention the primary fallacy of string theory, which is that it relies on a static background. M-theory, if workable, could fix this

      Err... maybe, maybe not. We really know practically nothing about M-theory. Attempts to find a background-free formulation of string theory are in their infancy at best, they usually just perturb about a Minkowski or AdS background to get gravitons and whatnot. Loop quantum gravity is background-free but not as nice in other respects. There's still a *long* way to go to get a quantum theory of gravity.

    2. Re:The Elegant Universe by Bio · · Score: 1

      Though this post might be redundant, I have to vote for this book! I very much enjoyed reading it, and I like the food for thought it provides.

      It gets a bit hard to understand near the end, but it provides a good introduction to relativitiy and quantum mechanics at the beginning. It would make a good basic reading.

    3. Re:The Elegant Universe by phoenixdigital · · Score: 1

      I absolutely aggree with you on this one.

      This book has one of the best explanations of the theory of relativity I have EVER heard. I have read countless other books but none had explained it in the manner he does. The moment I read the explanation I had a feeling which I'm sure some would compare to a religious expreience. I had understood the theory of relativity but this made me understand exactly why this all these effects happen. I was going to skip over the section as I had read it in countless oher book. I am so happy I didn't.

      I am still making my way thru this book as I only started it about 1 week ago, I had it on my shelf for over 1 year.

      I highly reccomend this book as it is one of the latest books on the topic of string theory and there have been quite a few changes in recent years which this book covers.

      Another good book is Hyperspace.

    4. Re:The Elegant Universe by 80's+Greg · · Score: 1

      I agree. When I first started reading The Elegant Universe (http://www.wwnorton.com/catalog/fall98/universe.h tm), I'd go to bed and couldn't sleep because my brain was going a million miles an hour thinking about everything I'd just read. The first third of the book introduces you to some amazing stuff, such as some of Einstein's ideas about time travel, numerous dimensions, and basic physics.

      The second two thirds are a bit more complex and I began to lose interest. It spent a lot of time talking about the Theory of Everything and how that seems to be the Holy Grail of physics these days. It also got into some extra-dimension stuff which was cool.

      Overall it's definitely worth reading. Like I said, the first third is mind blowing, and the rest is interesting enough to keep reading.

      --
      I gotta have more cowbell.
    5. Re:The Elegant Universe by canadian_right · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics
      by Gary Zukav, David Finkelstein

      Mass Market Paperback - 384 pages Reissue edition (September 1, 1984)
      Language: English
      Bantam; ISBN: 055326382X

      The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory
      by Brian Greene, B. Greene

      Paperback - 464 pages 1 edition (February 29, 2000)
      Language: English
      Vintage; ISBN: 0375708111

      Read the Dancing Wu Li Masters first, then Elegant Universe to get an excellent overview of quantum physics over the last 100 years or so.

      I've read them both twice, and I still can't honestly say I grok quantum physics.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    6. Re:The Elegant Universe by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Yes, mod the parent up, please!

      The distinction between M-theory and string theory, AFAIK, has absolutely nothing to do with the issue of the assumption of a background spacetime.

      Anyway, the original question was about introductory physics. Plenty of people have posted suggestions about books that give a good intro to classical physics. Then you can learn quantum physics and relativity. Only then do you need to worry about issues like this, which have to do with how to reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity. A good book on that topic is Three Roads to Quantum Gravity.

    7. Re:The Elegant Universe by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1
      I have to dissent - Dancing Wu Li Masters and The Tao of Physics are complete piles of doo-doo. They strain to pound the round "quantum" buzzword into the square hole of eastern religion, and it just doesn't work. Both authors make leaps of logic (when they use logic at all) to claim that modern physics somehow justifies, or reinforces, certain religions. The whole discussion devolves into a lot of oversimplified, overgeneralized, fuzzy-headed, feel-good blather that really makes little sense when scrutinized.

      Check out the article on Deepak Chopra and Ayurvedic medicine at The Skeptic's Dictionary for more criticism of these books.

  44. Good introductions to complex topics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would recommend the book "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking. Hawking is an incredibly smart man, but the book is very accessible to the layperson. It gives a good basic introduction into the concepts of modern physics (i.e., relativity, QM, string theory, supersymmetry, etc.) without going into a lot of the math. The intellectual crowd might be a bit put off by Hawking's constant references to "God" throughout the text, but I think he was just trying to please his target audience. Others have bashed the somewhat speculative and theoretical nature of the book, but lots of chapters (i.e., the one on the thermodynamic and temporal arrows) give you things to think about.

    I would also recommend "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" by the man himself, Albert Einstein. This text goes a bit more into the math and explains SR and GR in a relatively straightforward fashion. This would be a good second step after reading "Brief History", which really only spends a chapter or two on the subject.

  45. quantum cryptography by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 2

    Quantum Cryptography may not be "the place to start" but it is free, and you are cheap:
    http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/presk ill/ph22 9/#describe

  46. Saxon Books.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saxon has some pretty good books, that makes it easy to learn math or physics. I took 2 years of physics in high school and we used this book. It was very easy to understand the basic concepts of physics, and also could lead to the understanding of deeper physics (quantium physics, etc).

  47. The Feynman Lectures on Physics by CmdrSam · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're looking for the real, actual stuff (a book of physics as opposed to a book about physics) I would very strongly recommend the Feynman Lectures on Physics. They cover mechanics, E&M, and quantum mechanics: they were the first 2 years of courses at Caltech when Feynman taught them.

    They get tough in places, but are appropriate for a physics major undergrad, someone with an already good general knowledge of mathematics and a little bit of physics, or just a bright and ambitious high school student. They're a little pricey (all textbooks are) but you might be able to find them at the public library.

    Just about every student at Caltech has at least one of these three books...

    --Sam L-L

    1. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by lukehan · · Score: 2

      If you don't want to shell out big bucks, you can pick up some excerpts of these lectures for about $15, they are called "Six Easy Pieces" and "Six Not So Easy Pieces". They are short books that have some very good basic material. The easy pieces has little or no math in it and the not so easy has more math, but it is still presented in a very understandable way. Also, Relativity: The Special and General Theory by A. Einstein is very easy to read and understand.

    2. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The full Feynman lectures are famous and excellent, but not always an easy read.
      There is a first-class inexpensive distillation of this called "Six Easy Pieces" from Perseus Book for $13. It's 150 pages of wonderful, informal writing, accessible to any bright high-school student. And when you've digested it, you'll know a lot.

    3. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      I want to second this. I studied physics during my first year at Cambridge and my supervisor practically begged me to buy these books. I wish I had taken his advice.

      Since graduation (I'm a computer scientist by trade) my interest in physics has been rekindled. I've read all the other books that have been recommended on this topic ("A Brief History of Time", "The Universe in a Nutshell", "The Elegant Universe", and so forth) and found them all immensely frustrating: the first few chapters are straightforward enough thanks to the physics I was exposed to, but after that things become less and less precise and harder and harder to gain even an inkling of what point the author is trying to make. The final chapters of these books might as well be written in Perl, they're so opaque.

      The Feynman Lectures not only give you the physics, but also the maths you need to do the physics. Moreover, Feynman does it in such an easy style that you're half way through the book before you realise you now deeply understand the "why" of core bits of maths and physics where before you only just grasped the process of how to apply certain results. Magic stuff.

      - Ralph

    4. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by ralphbecket · · Score: 1

      Ah, also check out "Introducing Quantum Theory" from the "Introducing..." series. Don't be put off by the cartoon style - this book is written by someone who really knows their onions. It essentially tells the story of physics from about 1850-1950: the experiments that classical theory couldn't explain, the first use of statistical mechanics and the quantum concept, the attempts to reconcile the quantum approach with the classical approach, and the various problems and their solutions that led to modern quantum theory.

      The key results are presented, but you won't know enough to use them. What you will have, however, is a genuine understanding of what it's all about and how we got there.

      Highly recommended.

    5. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by eigerface · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on The Feynman Lectures. If you can find the film version (Yes, I show my age!) it is fabulous.

      Another fine, older text is called "Physics for the Inquiring Mind", but the author eludes me.

    6. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      These are wonderful books if you're a mathematical wizard, and are the type of person who'd be bored in the standard CalTech intro physics course(!). That's who Feynman wrote them for: the top 0.00001% of the population.

      If you're in the other 99.99999%, start with a different book, and then read the Feynman lectures later. Even Feynman later said that he considered his own course to be a failure -- but what a glorious failure!

    7. Re:The Feynman Lectures on Physics by RockyJSquirel · · Score: 1

      Feynman's the real thing. Most other books for laymen are washouts - words not information.

      And don't listen to the people who say you have to be a math genius to read them. Feyman pretty much avoided going into math geekdom in those books. As Einstein said, things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.

      Rocky J. Squirrel

  48. Introduction to particle physics by mcamen · · Score: 2

    Well, it's not a book but I think ParticleAdventure.org is really great. In fact, it's on of the best site on the net!
    Furthermore you should have a look at QuarkDance.org ;-))

  49. One Question by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Are you part of Saddam's crack team of nuclear scientists?

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  50. Dianetics! by TheDick · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great book, totally factual and easy to understand, though it can get a bit pricey......

    --

  51. Elegant Universe by brilliant-mistake · · Score: 1

    If you've got a basic understanding of general relativity and quantum mechanics and you'd like to catch up on what's going on in physics nowadays, Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe" is a pretty good book. It's a pretty good explanation of string theory for people who are relative beginners.

    1. Re:Elegant Universe by sachemcst · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. It's written well enough that people that are new to physics can wrap their head around it , yet contains enough technical data, explanation and theory that the scholared can get something good out of it as well.

    2. Re:Elegant Universe by joe_bruin · · Score: 2

      i second this. the elegant universe is an excellent book to catch up on what the current state of string theory is (and how it got there). definitely recommended.

    3. Re:Elegant Universe by stdw6104 · · Score: 1

      This books discussion and analogies used for quantum mechanics and relativity are quite satisfying. As a physicist, I found it very accessible but many friends found only the introductory chapters useful and then they got lost. The point though, is that the introductions provide good qualitative understanding of topics

  52. Re:Brief History by joncarwash · · Score: 1

    I agree completely, I read A Brief History of Time and I found it very interesting and very readable. And this was in early high school. I do suggest a little background knowledge in physics first, though.

    Now time to go see if the book is still kicking around somewhere...

    --
    A computer is a valuable tool, so use it and stop whining.
  53. What do you want to know? by daghlian · · Score: 1

    If you want to know about all that cool chaos theory, quantum mechanics, black hole stuff then pick up any of a number of excellent books aimed at laymen; Chaos by James Gleick is pretty good, and In Search of Schroedinger's Cat by James Gribbin is a really good hand-waving (no math) book about quantum. If you actually want to be able to do physics (or write games with realistic physics, etc.) then you'd do well to find a decent introductory textbook (Halliday and Resnick, Fowler, etc.) Note that to do physics at all two things are required: 1) you must think well, and 2) you must do algebra at a bare minimum, and calculus if you want to learn anything really interesting.

    --

    One of these days/I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

    1. Re:What do you want to know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one in this vein is "The Dancing Wu Li Masters". It is really user friendly. The only problem is every chapter is marked Chapter 1, which can get annoying for referencing.

    2. Re:What do you want to know? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halliday and Resnick is not the best for an intro to physics. It's rather terse and elegant, and can be a bit misleading at times. On the plus side, it is -almost- error free.

  54. try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    finding "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene.

  55. quantum theory by agentq · · Score: 1

    Quantum Theory: A Very Short Introduction is a pretty good, mathless (well, except for the appendix) look at some of the important discoveries of the 20th century.

    1. Re:quantum theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its easiest to see un-thinkable concepts and abstract space crap when using math. Can't be comprehended any other way.

  56. Halliday and Resnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world over, this is the standard Intro to Physics text. Master this and you've got an excellent grasp of basic physical laws.

    1. Re:Halliday and Resnick by Shamanin · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. This is one of the few books that I keep on my shelf still today. I used it in college to get through Newtonian Physics, Electricity and Magnetism, Light and Optics. Extremely complete and (as long as you have the mathematical foundation required) very appropriate for "bootstraping" the novice OR refreshing the non-physics professional.

      See the picture of the geek girl wearing a Maxwells equations tee-shirt on page 832 (chapter 37). I hope to marry that girl.

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
  57. physics articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here are a few very well-written articles about a couple dozen topics in physics:

    http://www.monmouth.com/~jsd/physics/00index.html

    Although far from comprehensive, they're summaries of topics that have come up in a physics teachers' email list.

  58. I didn't like any of my physics texts... by bziman · · Score: 2
    But Strunk & White's timeless classic "Elements of Style" will teach you that "a lot" is two words. Master the easy stuff, and then move on to physics.

    Once there, you can go to the local book store or even the library and pick up a high school text on physics. They're mostly awful, but if you're bright, you can probably extract the basic theory from them.

    --brian

  59. Feynman Lectures by mocm · · Score: 2

    For beginners I think the Feynman Lectures are quite
    helpful. Feynman had a unique way of explaining physics in an easy to understand way without oversimplifying or omitting things. Here is a link
    at amazon without endorsing this online bookstore.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
  60. Quantum Mechanics by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

    For QM, it's really more helpful to get a book (Griffiths is good), but you can get some of the basics online if you've got a really good LinAl background (let's hope most CSists do).

    At Caltech, Dr. Mabuchi is resident QM whiz. You can get his lecture notes at

    http://minty.caltech.edu/Ph195/downloads.htm

    While they're really coherent, as far as physics derivations go, you might want to have someone who's had a first year's QM around to answer questions. And again, you should have a good grasp of LinAl, since that's pretty much what QM is.

    As for general reading, I find that PRL (prl.aps.org) has pretty readable stuff, and it's also really interesting. Do yourself a favor--if you're at a college that has the online subscriptions, skim a couple articles a week. For a while, I tried to make that my "news site" instead of slashdot. I'll keep trying, and will let you know (or not) about the results.

    Good luck

    1. Re:Quantum Mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Griffiths is great to learn from, but being a textbook (hardcover at that) it's not cheap. There are some really good (cheap too!) Dover books in physics.

      The best quantum Dover book I'v found is David Bohm's Quantum Theory, which he wrote when he was very young, just shortly after QM as we know it was born. So the book really gives you a historical construction of the theory, starting with classical mechanics and wave mechanics. Very interesting way of presenting QM. You'll learn a lot if you take the time to go through it; Griffiths would probably save you time, and it stays focused on just QM, not classical, so it's less confusing, and also covers really interesting topics in the appendix (watched pot effect, EPR-Bohm effect and the Bell's proof against local hidden variable theories).

  61. Mike's Particle Physics by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mike's Particle Physics column on Kuro5hin explains particle physics quite well for the layman. Unfortunately, K5 is slower than balls atm, so I can't give you a direct link (search for 'particle physics' and you should get all, like 5, articles).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  62. Take a course by mwarps · · Score: 1

    Like many of us here, I've had volumes of physics crammed into my head for three years at college. Go find a good school, get in, and take some physics courses. Or go buy a physics text book from a Tech school (MIT/RIT/RPI/CWRU/CMU/GaTech/etc). There's probably a marginally reputable one near you. If worse comes to worst, go on ebay and look for a textbook.

    Don't expect to understand anything much past Classical (Newtonian) Mechanics. Quantum Mechanics is not easily grasped unless taught. It's extremely counter-intuitive. Thus taking a course is your best bet.

  63. Any of the Feynman Lectures on Physics by auferstehung · · Score: 2, Informative

    are very good, although pricey. A good excuse for a trip to the local public library. Read Amazon's summary and review archives.

    --
    Logic is not Divine.
  64. Personal Favorites (new physics) by masterkool · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Dancing Wu Li Masters: Gary Zukav" A book about the dynamics of new physics without mathematics.
    The Elegant Universe: Brian Greene" Again, another new physics book with neat pics and no mathmaticas. Specific to Superstrings mostly.
    A Brief History of Time: Stephen Hawking" A good book about allmost everything between classical physics and the physics of the last few years. I.E. Relativity, quantum mechanics etc.

    --
    I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
    1. Re:Personal Favorites (new physics) by masterkool · · Score: 1

      It seems like alot of people here have posted commenting on A Brief History of TIme and The Elegant Universe. So they are probaly the best books. But check out the Wu Li Masters. Its a very interesting and rather eccentric way of describing the same information. At the least its a fun book to read.

      --
      I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
    2. Re:Personal Favorites (new physics) by jstott · · Score: 1
      The Dancing Wu Li Masters: Gary Zukav" [quanta-gaia.org] A book about the dynamics of new physics without mathematics.
      The Elegant Universe: Brian Greene" [wwnorton.com] Again, another new physics book with neat pics and no mathmaticas. Specific to Superstrings mostly.
      A Brief History of Time: Stephen Hawking" [psyclops.com] A good book about allmost everything between classical physics and the physics of the last few years. I.E. Relativity, quantum mechanics etc.

      These are books about physics, not physics books. You cannot properly teach physics without at least some mathematics. Pop-physics books like "A Brief Histor of TIme" or "QED" present the concepts clearly to non-technical readers, but they do this by leaving out more than they include. To take quantum mechanics as an example, If you can't work out the energy levels of the hyrogen atom by solving the eigenvalue problem, then you don't really understand quantum mechanics. If you don't even know what an eighenvalue is, then you really don't understand quantum mechanics.

      -JS

      "Mathematics is the language of physics" --unknown

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
  65. THE DANCING WU LI MASTERS by Cosmicfool · · Score: 0

    As many have mentioned, read breif history first, then read the dancing wu li masters. They will both ownz j00 in the eye.

  66. alt.e-book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try these:

    alt.e-book
    alt.e-book.technical
    alt.e-book.flood

    Someone is always posting something on the sciences in there. Recently, someone posted about three hundred Fenyman physics lectures. That was something you probably wanted.

  67. You could try Wolfram's other site for looking up by dameatrius · · Score: 1

    things (He has mathworld and the physics one is up and looks like he is still adding things but it is ok). Wolfram's Physics World

  68. Alice in Quantumland by Trak · · Score: 1

    Alice in Quantumland: An Allegory of Quantum Physics
    by Robert Gilmore
    Copernicus Books; ISBN: 0387914951; (August 1995)

    It's just like the title suggests: Alice in Wonderland meets Quantum Physics. I loved it.

  69. Some light books by jukal · · Score: 2
    ...from my amazon.com order history. These are not actually "school books", but might be more interesting reading than something more "factual" and give a reason to peek in some more details

    - The Turning Point (Fritjof Capra),
    - Einstein's Dreams (Alan P. Lightman),
    - Flatland (Edwin A. Abbott ),
    - The Mechanical Turk (Tom Standage).

    1. Re:Some light books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the light-reading Landau and Lifshitz series, including "The Classical Theory of Fields", "Quantum Electrodynamics" and "Theory of Elasticity". Goldstein's Mechanics and Jackson's Electrodynamics are also good beach reads.

    2. Re:Some light books by Frodo2002 · · Score: 1

      Yup, the moderators are so clueless that they don't even realise that this is meant to be funny :(

  70. If you want some quantum or particle physics... by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

    (Sorry. Hit enter the first time I posted this)

    Try "The God Particle" by Leon Lederman. Great book for quantum theory or even just basic particles. It was my constant reference when I was doing a report on particle accelerators.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  71. Start with Math... by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0
    I would first recommend
    • A course in Mathematics for Students of Physics by Bamberg & Sternberg
    • Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics by V. I. Arnol'd (anything by Arnol'd would be a terriffic place to start)
    And then move on to the physics, like
    • The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime by Hawking and Ellis
    • but first you might want to skim Gravitation by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.
    • Dirac's Quantum Mechanics is nice and short without being overly simplistic.
    Hope this helps!
    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
    1. Re:Start with Math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime by Hawking and Ellis
      * but first you might want to skim Gravitation by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler.


      No kidding! Hawking & Ellis goes into deep global analysis. You should know GR before reading this - try Wald or Sean Carroll's notes, or Gravitation, but Hawking & Ellis is not for the beginner.

  72. The Elegant Universe by Slarty · · Score: 1

    The best book of this type I've read in the last few years is Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe". It's written in plain, understandable English (AFAIK there aren't any formulas in the entire book) and goes through everything from relativity to quantum physics to superstring theory.

    It's definitely an overview book for the layman, written for reading enjoyment rather than as a textbook, but I learned more from this book than anything else I've read in the past couple 'o years. I found it completely fascinating... highly recommended. Sorry, not available (AFAIK) as an e-book, but well worth the $12 or so you can get it for online.

    --
    Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
  73. History of the Atomic Bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, can't remember the author, but as a rather extensive backdrop to the development of atomic power and weaponry it dicusses the surge of development in physics starting in the 1860s or so through trinity. Here is the link on Amazon

  74. Everything you need to know... by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

    Everything you need to know about the laws of physics you can learn by watching Wylie E. Coyote and Roadrunner cartoons.

    Beep! Beep!

    1. Re:Everything you need to know... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Everything you need to know about the laws of physics you can learn by watching Wylie E. Coyote and Roadrunner cartoons

      This may be of some help.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  75. a great book by a great man by jhagler · · Score: 1

    The single best source for a basic explanation of much of modern physics is Richard Feynman's Six Easy Pieces, and at 137 pages you won't feel like it's too great an undertaking to ever be acomplished.

    It contains a basic history of physics, how it relates to the other sciences, and then goes into energy, gravitation, and basic quantum mechanics. Feynman is someone I had heard of in my college physics courses, but until I read this book I had never realized what an incredible man he was. He was a brilliant physicist but at the same time can explain things in a language anyone can understand, a definite rarity these days.

    Anyway, Six Easy Pieces is definitely a great starting place, if you start really getting into physics you might want to look into his entire series Lectures on Physics, but I'm not gonna lie to you he gets pretty deep in some of them.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  76. Before going physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Great suggestions so far from the all the /. folk out there, but one thing to consider is the eventual level of physics you look to achieve. Now very few people actually beleive they'll read a couple of books and become the next Plank/Hawking/Schrodinger/whomever, but if you want to learn on anything above a high-school level, you'll need to pick up some calculus.


    It has been said that physics is motion (although I can't remember by whom). Movement of a particle through space, movement of a ball through the air, movement a wire through an electric field, whatever. In cal terms, this pretty much works out to a hell of a lot of derivatives, and I personally don't think simple qualatative physics is enough for real understanding past the high-school level.

    Now I know some Slashdotters'll disagree and say "You don't need to know vector math to know gravity pulls a ball down." But then again you don't need to know what bytecode is to type on a word processor, and if you want to understand how computers work you need to take it to the next level. Same for physics.

    Just my two cents (three cents CDN). If you're bored and want to learn what happens when you move a wire through an electric field, pick up a grade 11/12 text. If you want to learn why, pick up the 11/12 text, a good calculus book and a few university level texts.

  77. Working Link by SoSueMe · · Score: 1, Redundant
  78. For the novice and beyond by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    I strongly recommend Feynman's lectures on physics. I think that in the event of nuclear war devastating all of the world, these books would be at the top of the list for the recovery manuals...hmmm, sounds like an interesting Ask Slashdot.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  79. Books by Steven Hawking by Death+Rattle · · Score: 1
    I really enjoyed two books by Stephen Hawking. They were both written with the novice in mind.

    The Illustrated Brief History of Time
    The original version is cheaper, but the illustrations go along way to making concepts easy to grasp for someone with very little physics background.

    The Universe in a Nutshell
    This book is a follow up to A Brief History of Time with updated information. This book is illustrated as well.

    Anyone interested in more info about Stephen Hawking can check out his website.

  80. Understanding Physics by Gn0M3KInG · · Score: 1

    That's the title of a really good book by Isaac Asimov. Starts out nice and light as a read adn gradually accelerates to really advanced topics, as its 3 books in 1. You could either do that or just read Newton's Principa Mathematica...!!!

  81. Physics and quantum mechanics by joe_bruin · · Score: 2
    two wonderful books i've found:

    Richard Feynman's Six Not So Easy Pieces is a great explanation of some fundamental concepts of physics, especially the whole time/speed of light relationship (do you really really understand why the speed of light is the speed limit? if not, read this book). it has alot of forumulas, but they do not need to be understood for the book to make sense.

    Brian Greene has a very thorough explanation of the leading edge of quantum mechanics and string theory (or m-theory) in The Elegant Universe. this book is free of formulas, but very good at explaining how theories evolved, up to current research status.

  82. the universe according to letterman by dpearre · · Score: 1

    if david letterman were to write a smart, fascinating physics book, it'd be "The God Particle: If the Universe is the Answer, What is the Question?" a wonderful, funny, interesting read that covers some of the coolest physics concepts i've ever run across. could not recommend more highly.

  83. Britney Spears Guide to Semiconductor Physics by reg106 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the physics behind lasers, transistors, and other semiconductor marvels, check out the Britney Spears Guide to Semiconductor Physics!

  84. Physics for Everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to relate high level physics to people that do not specialize in the discipline. I am a Nuclear physicist and I find this to be the most complicated task I have. Some people have mentioned Feynman and Hawking but if you really want to learn basic or fundamental physics, I recommend not taking their advice on that. Those books are "fun" to read for people that aren't advanced in physics but they offer very little with respect to useful substance. The most damaging aspect of such books is that they make the reader believe that they truly understand what is going on when they in fact do not. My recommendation is to brush up on basic calculus with a Freshman/Sophmore level calculus book. Then go thru a Sophmore level general physics book backwards and forwards. If you do this, you will place yourself way beyond most people with respect to truly understanding fundamental physics. Some will say that this is too detailed for the average person but I disagree. The true nature of the formulaism is no where near touched with such books. From this point, you are now ready to read up on any topic you are truly interested in such as Quantum, Electromagnetism, Chaos, etc.... You can't just jump straight into Quantum for instance without first knowing fundamental physics. It's just not possible. Those that say it is are fooling themselves. Anyway, I hope this helps.

    Maynord

  85. QED by Richard Feynman: No math, just concepts by polyphemus · · Score: 1

    It's Quantum Electrodynamics, and covers pretty much everything you'd need to know about electrons, which means 99% of the stuff we deal with in everyday lives (everything but gravity, that is).

  86. Great Foundational Books by TakenName · · Score: 1

    A good intro book should be brief and interesting. Two books that everyone should read are: Vibrations and Waves by Anthony P. French -and- Introduction to Quantum Physics by A. P. French, Edwin F. Taylor. I found french to be be very clear and fun to read. Vibrations should be read first because the concepts are more familiar but the math is similar and it will make the Quantum Book easier to digest. If you are the sort of person who must have The Bible for ever subject, you have to pick up: Quantum Mechanics Vol I&II by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Bernard Diu, Frank Laloe. CTDL is an indispensible reference for the serious student covering everything from scattering to electron spin and magnetism to lasers. It is a really dense book and should not be studied lightly or you will get lost. If you are looking for a solid state physics Bible(semiconductors, superconductors, slashdot fodder)there is no better book than: Introduction to Solid State Physics by Charles Kittel. Chapters 1-3 covers crystals and once you have that, the rest is easy. This is again a higher level reference. Lastly, there is a really good book called QED by Richard Feynman. Quantum Electro Dynamics is a really cool field and this book is totally accesible to any reader (it is a short little paper back). However, this book contradicts alot of QM and will confuse someone who is trying to conceptualize QM using French or CTDL.

  87. Quantum theory, etc. by Triv · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's see...

    "Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries" by John Gribbin. Very readable and occasionally funny. Bit of a steep learning curve but you don't really notice it if you've got a few physics classes under your belt.

    "The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory" by Brian Greene. excellent read (although I'm only halfway through - there might be plot twists that I don't know about. ;)

    Oh, and I'd also pick up a copy of "Copenhagen" by Michael Frayn. No, on second thoughts, I'd pick up a copy on CD. It's a play, and should be seen...but since that's not available, you're better off listening to it instead. :)

    Triv

    1. Re:Quantum theory, etc. by eric_ste · · Score: 1

      I'm currently reading Greene's book (The elegant Universe).
      It's a really nice book. Not everyone cant get trough without a good understanding of maths and physics. But I can tell you that half of the people can get to page 200 without problems. It gets tougher when they start talking about Calabi-Yau space or manifolds. Because of this I have to review my analytic and Algebraic gemotry, after many many years out of University.

      The book gives you a completely different perspective on the Universe and also gives you brain food for the rest of your life for $15. ;)

      But don't think you can bring the subject up in a familly meeting. I tried and they trew me out of the party when I started talking about the M-Theory and its 11 dimensions.

      Fortunatly my wife knows me and she did not file fore divorce... yet!

    2. Re:Quantum theory, etc. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      "Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries" by John Gribbin

      I'm a big fan of Gribbin. Don't forget "In Search of Schroedinger's Cat" (a bit dated -- but still good), and "The Search for Superstrings".

      Michio Kaku is also fairly approachable -- "Hyperspace" and "Beyond Einstein".

      And for a really great intro (by extrapolating relativistic and/or quantum effects into the "everyday" universe), George Gamow's "Mr. Tompkins in Wonderland".

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  88. Serway, Serway, Serway. by Garin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Raymond Serway's text, "Physics for Scientists and Engineers (with modern physics)" has EVERYTHING that a beginning physics student needs. All that you need to bring to the table is some basic math skills (you can even get by without calculus if necessary). This is (was?) the workhorse textbook for virtually every first-year "real" physics course that I've ever seen. Heck, we used it in two first year courses, and three second year courses. It's a great book. When I did my physics degree (graduated 2000) I used this book clear through to my senior years as an overall reference. I used the 3rd edition, but I'm sure newer editions are just as good.

    It is clear, concise, complete, and easily available on the cheap. I'm very sure you could go to your local college or university and buy it in the used textbook store. Don't worry if it's five or ten years old -- first-year physics hasn't changed much in ten years :)

    --
    In any field, find the strangest thing and then explore it. -John Archibald Wheeler
    1. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother! This textbook is sitting on my bookshelf and even in graduate school (finished MS in Physics) it got lots of mileage when I needed a quick review of little-used material.

    2. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by funbobby · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. I've read a lot of physics textbooks, and this one really stands out. There's nothing flashy about it, but it explains the basics clearly and concisely, and makes a very good reference.

    3. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you realy want a chalenge.....master these.... or take a class useing. Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory John R. Reitz Frederick J. Milford Robert W. Christy -- Hard core....3 semesters of studing within 630 pages. Classical Mechanics Tai L. Chow -- Lagrangian and Hamiltonian in the first chapters......how rude. The book to relearn Calc and DifEQ to. A calculus course is mathmatical masterbation without the problem solving found in these two examples texts. Chapter 4 in Foundations of Electromagnetic Theory changed my life...well before TIVO.

    4. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I once taught introductory physics out of the algebra-based version of this book (Serway and Faughn). It has a lot of good conceptual homework questions in it, but other than that, I didn't like the book. Too often, it started a chapter with an equation, with no explanation of where the equation came from. It's basically a plug-and-chug book. Maybe the calculus-based version you're referring to is better.

      For a calculus-based book, I think Knight is pretty good. You can also check out my own free texts via my Slashdot user page. My calculus-based book, Simple Nature, is not as mature a project as my algebra-based series, Light and Matter.

    5. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by Ami_Chan · · Score: 1

      I agree with this very much. I was taught from the algebra-based Serway and Faughn book. It was completely plug-and-chug.

      However, in it's defense, it did provide some funny, (if glaringly wrong,) problems. One my physics teacher loved pointing out was a problem with a baby weighing 40 Newtons(about 10 pounds or 4 and a half kilograms) in a full-size swingset. I will remember that problem for a long time.

    6. Re:Serway, Serway, Serway. by jstott · · Score: 1
      Raymond Serway's text, "Physics for Scientists and Engineers (with modern physics)" has EVERYTHING that a beginning physics student needs. All that you need to bring to the table is some basic math skills (you can even get by without calculus if necessary). This is (was?) the workhorse textbook for virtually every first-year "real" physics course that I've ever seen.

      Halliday and Resnick (Halliday, Resnick, and Walker in the newer editions) is the other standard first-year textbook. Also very good, but it does require some basic knowledge of calculus.

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
  89. Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" by Cosmicbandito · · Score: 4, Informative

    I grew up on this one. He uses clever little drawings to explain physics principles. Gonick is only the cartoonist though. He collaborated with a physicist named Art Huffman to write this. It's a great introduction to the principles of physics and electricity for novices.

    Just search for his name and physics on Amazon or at your favorite bookseller.

    He's also written some excellent history books.
    (Cartoon history of the universe I and II. These got me through me freshman year history courses. Lots of interesting little tidbits. Did you know the Egyptians used crocidile dung as birth control?)

    1. Re:Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      I'll second this. Gonick is very good at getting the basic principles across in an interesting and non-threatening way. There is very little math in the book, but most beginners find the math intimidating. Once they understand the concepts, they'll have a much easier time learning how to work through problems from another source.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    2. Re:Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" by Lish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Absolutely. The Cartoon Guides really do a good job of distilling down broad topics to a level Joe Reader can understand, in a way that's funny and interesting. The genetics one is particularly great, as are the History of the Universe books. I just found out they're doing a Volume III of that series, looking forward to it.

      For completeness, here's an Amazon link: Larry Gonick.

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    3. Re:Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      (Cartoon history of the universe I and II. These got me through me freshman year history courses. Lots of interesting little tidbits. Did you know the Egyptians used crocidile dung as birth control?)

      And there was a...cartoon about this?

      I'm not sure I want to see that one.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    4. Re:Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" by JordanH · · Score: 2
      • Did you know the Egyptians used crocidile dung as birth control?

      !!!

      Darn! I thought I had invented that technique.

      Just goes to show you...

  90. Quantum Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No-one understand quantum physics, so I wouldn't worry too much. The best you can do is be less confused than most people by it.

  91. maybe not what you're looking for... by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1
    but a good entry-level basic physics book is The Cartoon Guide to Physics.

    I'm not good at physics, but have really enjoyed that book. And though I love Feynman's stories, I have no hope of understanding his or Hawking's writings on physics. (Maybe they should've made cartoons?)

  92. Quantum Reality - Nick Herbert by VerdeRana · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excellent book. Quite readable, but not as condescending or formula-averse as many layman-oriented science books. Used as a textbook in the best QM course I've had. Also discusses philosophy of QM in fascinating detail.

  93. i have no idea by wcmcgr · · Score: 1

    Im sorry, never quite understood how someone could say they knew anything of physics without understanding the mathematics involved in it. While all of those books are great for a thimble full of info, their only purpose should be to inspire to go on to learn the meat of physics. just my opinion anyways..

  94. Carl Sagan?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Cosmos, Broca's Brain and Billions and Billions are a few great books, but more about cosmology. Being that he was an English major I believe they are very well written.

  95. American Institute of Physics by vic5 · · Score: 1

    Try http://newton.ex.ac.uk/aip/ it sports weekly updates and well organized topics.

    Feynman (Six Easy Pieces) is great, but Paul Davies (About Time) is a more enjoyable read.

    --
    catch a wave and ride till ya hit the beach
  96. Quantum Mechanics is essential by Hanul · · Score: 2, Informative

    To understand modern physics a deep understanding of quantum mechanics (QM) is absolutely neccessary and that means you have to do MATHS! Without computing some problems with your own brain cells a lot of the important structure of QM will be hidden. Not one of the popular book on this topic, be it Hawking, Penrose, Barrow, or else, can explain this, because - well, because the structure lies in the mathematical form itself. You can't translate this in layman's terms. No, you can't.

    Also, you can't determine the limits of QM without knowing what maths is used for it. And to explore far more advanced topics like QED, QCD, or even Super Strings and M-Theory, you should be aware, that the underlying maths is far more advanced, too.

    "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" (2nd Ed.) by Ramamurti Shankar is a good introductory textbook. If you worked through it, and solved all the exercises, you will have a good understanding of classic quantum mechanics.

    You can't understand a subject without actually studying it - and by studying I mean studying as you would for an university exam.

    1. Re:Quantum Mechanics is essential by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      Amen to what you said.

      It bothers me that people want a short cut to
      Physics. I wonder why they think everybody else
      has to get through three semesters of calculus
      before even touching this stuff, yet that there
      must be a way to spoon feed it to them on a 3 minute attention span.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Quantum Mechanics is essential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, true.

      Another good text that's slanted more toward those with a chemistry background is Donald McQuarrie's "Quantum Chemistry" - this text assumes you have a solid math background to diff eq, and largely is nothing but basic applied math. I highly recommend it.

    3. Re:Quantum Mechanics is essential by jgerman · · Score: 2
      Amen to your amen. I will admit I have a weakness for the "popular science" books. They're entertaining reads and can be informative, but stuff like "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" as much as I liked reading it will not help you understand physics. Want to understand. Go work through a calc book, then go get a physics text, Tipler or whatever and work through. Do the problems.


      I respect the desire to learn more, and if you want a superficial view of this branch of science that's great, but realize that all you are getting is a superficial view. If you want to understand, you must understand the math.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  97. The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great book that explains physics on a human level instead of being way over your head. Also not simplistic. I suggest this book to anyone who has also wanted to know about physics, but was intimidated(sp?)by the subject matter.

  98. physics books by giZabe · · Score: 1

    Ok first of all great question... I love physics books and have read a bunch of them. Probably one of the best all-around physics books to read that is really exciting and sexy (yes, physics can be sexy!) and well written is: -A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking: this book covers everything including the big bang, special relativity, black holes, the nature of time, and quantum mechanics. It's a fantastic read and it's one of the few books that really changed my life. It's very heavy (I respect anyone who can make it all the way through this book) but it's also relatively easy to read. After reading this book it's also fun to rent the documentary movie version of it. This is a must read. As for quantum mechanics, which, as you pointed out, is a whole field of it's own; my favorite book is: -In Search of Schrodinger's Cat by John Gribbin: It's another book for lay-people that follows the history of quantum mechanics (which is quite interesting... unlike relativity, QM was developed by dozens of different geniuses over a period of about 50 years...) and describes many of the fascinating experiements that have changed the way we percieve the world. It's a delightful read that will leave you very well-informed on the quantum world. If you still want more you can read the sequel called 'Schrodinger's Kittens' too. :) For a little more depth on physics in general including quantum mech and relativity, you should read the classic: 'The Feynman Lectures on Physics' by Richard Feynman: Actually, read anything by Richard Feynman. This collection was actually taken from a series of lectures he gave at Cal Tech. It's actually a textbook, so it's not as easy as the above books, but it's a great reference to have on the shelf if you want to look up any of the subjects mentioned elsewhere in a bit more detail. Feynman is a fantastic writer and his descriptions of mind-bogglingly complex topics are easy to understand as he uses lots of analogies to more comprehensible. One other fascinating topic of late is super-string theory, aka M-theory which is an attempt at a Grand Unified Theory (a theory that unites the four fundamental forces into one unified whole) that is gaining popularity today and is probably the leating GUT around. A decent book on string theory is: 'Beyond Einstein: The Cosmic Quest for the Theory of the Univers' by Michio Kaku My only complaint with this book is that it doesn't go into quite enough scientific depth... but that's probably to be expected considering there are probably about a dozen people in the world today who truly understand string-theory. It raises some really interesting points though, and you'll know enough after reading it to be able to understand news articles about string-theory. If you have to read just one of these books get 'A Brief History of Time.' It's a classic among classics. Anything by Stephen Hawking is good. Roger Penrose is another good writer to check out and Richard Feynman has a ton of funny books of essays and stories that deal with physics in a truly unique way. Hope this helps! I wish I could read all these books again for the first time! :) gg

    1. Re:physics books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One other fascinating topic of late is super-string theory, aka M-theory which is an attempt at a Grand Unified Theory (a theory that unites the four fundamental forces into one unified whole) that is gaining popularity today and is probably the leating GUT around.

      No, string theory is not a GUT. When a physicist says "GUT", she means simply a theory that unifies all the interactions except gravity. That is, electromagnetism, the weak interaction, and the strong interaction. These theories embed the Standard Model gauge group in a larger group like SU(5), SO(10) or E_6. Adding gravity is even trickier since we don't know a way to quantize it at all. String theory is an attempt at this, superstring theory is the supersymmetric version thereof, and M-theory is an unknown extension of superstring theory.

  99. It's about String Theory but... by SLiK812 · · Score: 1

    The book The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory by Brian Greene is about String Theory and the quest for the Ultimate Theory (the one Holy Grail theory that is the basis for all forces in the universe). It does have four or so chapters on Relativity that are really easy to understand. The overall read was great: layman enough not to go over your head, but not patronizing either.

  100. Physics and other stuff for free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to zeropaid.com and download "kaazaa lite" and FastTrack Accelerator for it so it is faster... then search for "physics" and you will have yourself a library of free documents. I was also able to find feynman, hawking and einstein.... in text and as audio files, also many a place have free lessons, or you could go to your local mega univercity and sit at one of the 200+ student physics lectures

  101. "College Physics" by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    One of the most comprehensive books you will find is probably "College Physics". It covers virtually every aspect from motion, right through to quantum.

    I used this as a reference whilst in college, and found it a fantastic book - enjoyable to read, no verbosity, and has plenty of meat to sink your teeth into.

    A great companion book is "problems in physics", which is a compilation of physics questions, again, covering the entire physics spectrum, and going from the easy to the ridiculous.

    College Physics

  102. Real physics books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Few of the books I've seen recommended are real physics books, they're popularizations. Here are some real recommendations, arranged in order of increasing difficulty in each category:

    Mechanics:
    Feynman lectures vol. 1
    Kleppner & Kolenkow: An Introduction to Mechanics
    Marion & Thornton: Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems
    Goldstein: Classical Mechanics
    Arnol'd: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics
    Abraham & Marsden: Foundations of Mechanics

    Electricity & Magnetism:
    Feynman lectures vol. 2
    Purcell: Electricity and Magnetism
    Griffiths: Introduction to Electrodynamics
    Jackson: Classical Electrodynamics

    Quantum Mechanics:
    Feynman lectures vol. 3
    Rosu: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0004072
    Shankar: Quantum Mechanics
    Sakurai: Advanced Quantum Mechancis
    Feynman & Hibbs: Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals

    More advanced stuff:
    Wald: General Relativity
    Feynman: Theory of Fundamental Processes
    Peskin & Schroeder: Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
    Weinberg: Quantum Theory of Fields, vol 1 - 3
    Guckenheimer & Holmes: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields

    Statistical Mechanics:
    Kittel: Thermal Physics
    Landau & Lifshitz: Statistical Physics
    Feynman: Statistical Mechanics Lectures

    Oh, and don't look for PDFs for physics stuff! Look for postscript. Much more stuff in that format.

    http://www.arxiv.org The archive of physics pre-prints (be warned, some stuff here is not by professionals). Search for "introduction", you'll find good stuff.

  103. Einstein by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of Einstein's book Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. It's easy to read, intellegent, short, and cheap.

    Of course, it's only about relativity.

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
  104. Besides Feynman by IPFreely · · Score: 2
    I have read Feynman, and he is good. He does well defining as closely as possible the understanding of Quantum. But I've found others that are good and clear and probably more to the readers liking. These had more of an overview of the precice details that Feynman gets into, but covers a wide variety of topics at an interesting (for me) level.

    I found In Search of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality to be a good introduction. It explains a lot about quantum at a level that is easy to read but also accurate. It has some companion books, basically anything by John Gribbin. They cover quantum, cosmic creation and evolution, various theories on cosmic destiny. "In search of the Big Bang" is great and detailed. I read the earlier books, circa 1990. There are later updates (Kittens is recommended) that should ring them up to date.

    I only wish I had time to go through them all (again). Sigh.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  105. Re:Halliday and Resnick--"Fundamentals of Physics" by Black+Susan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fundamentals of Physics by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker is now in its sixth edition.

    This is the book that I used when I was a freshman in college (am now a physics grad student) and it is excellent. It covers everything, including basic modern physics in its extended version, and has many cool gee-whiz examples of physics. It costs a pretty penny when new, but you could probably find a used, previous edition for cheap. I'd not buy any lower than the 4th edition.

    You will, however, need to know some calculus, as it is designed for a calculus-based university physics course. This is a good thing, I think, since the real meat of physics is based on calculus.

    Reading the popular-science type of book will only take you so far, if you want to start learning the real thing, you have to start dealing with books that have math in them.

  106. Learn from Homer J. by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So much I don't know about astrophysics. Why didn't I read that book by the wheelchair guy?"
    --Homer J. Simpson

    GMD

    1. Re:Learn from Homer J. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Larry Flynt is right! You all stink!"
      --Homer J. Simpson

  107. Physics in a Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The basics can consist of the following areas.

    Very Basic and easily understood compared to the other areas.
    1. Special Relativity
    This is just Einstien's theory of Relativity.
    Math level:algebra
    This stuff explains what happens at relavitistic speeds.

    2. Mechanics
    Math level: calculus, differential equations
    This explains basic motion, such as falling rocks, equations of orbits, etc.

    The nitty gritty areas. But many subfields are based on the following areas: optics, mechanics, lasers, properties of materials, electronics, etc.
    1. Electricity and Magnetism
    These all are followed by Maxwell's equations.
    Math level:Vector Calculus
    This stuff explains the behavior of charges, current, magnetism and light.

    2. Quantum Mechanics
    These are all about Schroedinger Equations.
    Math knowledge: Partial Differential Equations
    This explains stuff about on the microscopic scale. Is used to explain radioactive decay, chemical reactions, lasers, etc.

    3. Thermodynamics (including statistical)
    These are about the 3 laws of thermodynamics and the applications.

    The hard stuff.
    1. Gravitation
    Math knowledge: Differential Geometry
    This explains stuff like black holes.

    2. Quantum Electrodynamics
    This is based on merging Quantum Mechanics and Electromagnetics.

    3. String Theory
    Don't ask me what this entails but this sounded interesting to add to the mix.

    The cheap method is to do a search on Google. I found how a Tesla Coil works with a similar search.

    The novice level books are usually used in the basic college courses.

    The hard core books are usually used in the graduate courses.

    The Feynmann Lectures are very good reading if you have a good background in math and physics.

    WhatMeWorry!

    1. Re:Physics in a Nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Quantum Electrodynamics
      This is based on merging Quantum Mechanics and Electromagnetics.


      Not really, you can do that without QED. The key is that QED is a relativistic quantum theory of the interactions of electrons (more generally, muons or taus as well) with photons. It's part of the bigger framework of quantum field theory - the merging of special relativity with quantum mechanics. We don't yet know how to merge general relativity with quantum mechanics, because gravity can't be quantized in the mathematical framework we know of now. String theory is one attempt (the most popular, "trendy" approach) at resolving this. There are others.

  108. two great books on quantum theory by GedLandsEnd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Minus all the math, if you're not so inclined. John Gribbin wrote In Search of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality and Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality.

    Find 'em here and here

    A deeper look would be Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe. Amazon.com link here

    Cheers

  109. Need a good physics book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop the Caltech (California Institute of Technology) book store. You occasionally see Steven Hawkings there--enough said.

  110. Stephen Hawking by jbischof · · Score: 2
    If you like the theoretical physics (stuff about universes, really really big things, time travel, really really small things, etc) I would highly recommend two books by Stephen Hawking.

    His first A Brief History of Time goes into standard theoretical physics with some exploration about black holes, etc.

    His most recent book The Universe in a Nutshell has lots of great explanations, in layman terms, of modern theory. He covers p-brans, M-theory, lots of relativity type material. I highly recommend this one.

    Professor Hawking also has several lectures on his website that can give you information on more specific aspects of his research.

    this material will give you enough background in theoretical physics to wax philosophical and impress your geek friends with talk of alternate universes and multiple dimension objects. At the very least it is interesting material.

  111. The Evolution of Physics by joycea · · Score: 1

    Depending on how modern you want to go I would highly recommend "The Evolution of Physics" by Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld. It is written with a lucidity that only a true master of the subject could achieve. This will get you up to speed on most of modern physics (the subtitle is 'From Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta') If you want to explore more into the present day thought, "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene is an excellent book describing the fundamentals of string theory. And finally there is always "A Brief History of Time" but that IMO relates more to astrophysics than anything (but it's all interrelated in the end so...).

    If you're looking for alternative descriptions of the same ideas take a look at "The Tao of Physics" and "Dancing Wu Li Masters"

  112. Physics for the Rest of Us by khill3210 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found Physics for the Rest of Us to fill this role nicely. I wanted some more in-depth info about major physics topics but didn't want to have to go back to college and get a physics/math degree. It also provides nice real-world examples of physical properties resulting from the underlying theory.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/08 09 237164/qid=1031605560/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/002-364315 9-0188828?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

  113. The Elegant Universe by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    ...written by Brian Greene is a great book on Superstring theory - and a really great read. I highly recommend picking it up...for $12 you can't beat it.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  114. Recommendations by Larne · · Score: 2
    The Feynman Lectures are classics, and with good reason. They cover basic mechanics, special (and a little general) relativity, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics. The writing is engaging, and the math is easy to follow.

    The one major criticism you can make is that mechanics are covered without using the Lagrangian formalism, which is much more powerful and much more applicable to quantum mechanics. For this, you may want to check out Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics. This is a very dense book but it covers a lot, and in a way geared towards programmers. Warning: uses the Scheme programming language heavily. If you don't like Scheme, you won't like this one.

    For general relativity, I highly, highly recommend A First Course in General Relativity. The prerequisites are pretty minimal, and it's extremely well written.

    Beyond that, check out John Baez's list of favorite books. Actually, you might want to read anything and everything Professor Baez has to say about physics, he knows a lot, explains it very well and is willing to talk to people. He's one of the few working physicists who still bothers with usenet. I'm currently working through his book on Gauge Fields, Knots and Gravity, and am enjoying it immensely.

  115. some book info and stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the various theories and interpretation of quantum theory most of these are readable. The last one is an introductory level book on quantum theory (so 3rd/4th year university text book). More advanced work on quantum mechanics falls into the real of atomic and molecular physics and quantum computing (for which you actually need to do the math, and it's not all that meaningful if you aren't doing research anyway).

    Jauch J.M. Are Quanta Real © 1973 Bloomington Indiana university press

    Heisenberg, W. Physics and Philosophy; the revolution in modern science, © 1958 Harper, New York.

    Lindley D. Where does the Weirdness Go? © 1996 Basic Books New York

    Nuri, V.Z. Local Deterministic Hidden Variable theory based on a Loophole in Bell's Theorem © June 1998

    Merzbucher, E Quantum Mechanics and the Copenhagen Interpretation
    Symposium presented at CUNY © March 27 2000.

    Zeilinger A. On the Interpretation and Philosophical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics, © 1996

    Kent, A. Against the Many worlds Interpretation © 1997.

    Barrett J.A. Everett's Relative state formulation of Quantum Mechanics © 1998 Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy.

    Gasiorowicz, S. Quantum Physcis © 1996 John Wiley & Son's. Printed in the United States of America.

    For special or general relativity steven hawkings a brief history works, for slightly more technical on special relativity there is a handy book called special relativity by ernie Mcfarland.

    For electromagnetic theory any first year physics book Young and Freedmans University physics has lots of readable substance.

    For quantum computing (writen for a computer scientist) M.A. Nielsen and I.L Chaung Quantum computation and quantum information is a good book, but I used it as a graduate level textbook.

  116. Hawking, Einstein, Bohr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that Dilbert's engineering insights are commonly applicable. Dilbert

  117. Re:Jesus Saves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Jesus Saves by shopping online and using double coupons?

  118. He's looking for basics by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3

    I agree that The Elegant Universe is a great book but the Ask Slashdot guy is asking for something on BASIC physics -- not cutting edge superstring theory.

    BTW, I read an interview with Brian Greene in a magazine (I believe it was Scientific American) where he said that while he was surprised/pleased with the response to his book he wasn't planning on writing a new one. The reason is that he just cares about his research too much and felt that writing a book just took too much time/energy/thought away from his first love: string theory. Our loss.

    GMD

  119. I recommend Eminem... by Oliver+Newland · · Score: 0

    Many of his lyrics are closely intertwined with science. While it's a bit peurile for mature people like me, it would be perfect for an ignorant person like yourself. You can't deny his contributions to physics.

    Like in "Kill You", when he says "You faggots keep eggin me on/ till i have you at knifepoint and then you beg me to stop" is simply a stroke of genius. This song has the best explanation of f=ma that i've ever heard in any of my ivy league university's classes.

    Or perhaps in "Bitch Please II", when he says "here want me to tone it down? / {*LOWER pitch*} Suck my fuckin dick, you faggot", it simply sends shivers down my spine the way that he contradicts himself in the same way that Newton's laws contradicts the perpetual motion machine.

    "My Dad's Gone Crazy" is another stellar example. "Before I'd ever bite my tongue, I'd slice my gums" is a prime example of tooth inertia in humans. I highly recommend that physics novices pick up the latest Eminem CD or single.

    (I do not work for Arista records)

    --

    I got a 1600 on the SATs.
  120. Here here by mrvis · · Score: 1

    The Elegant Universe is quite excellent. The first half of the book, as it builds up to current string theory, is quite good. It's very readable (AP Physics was as high as I went).

    I recommend it whole heartedly.

  121. I recommend Greg Egan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.netspace.net.au/~gregegan/FOUNDATIONS/i ndex.html

    His science fiction is great as well.

  122. An Excellent Book by tkolich62 · · Score: 1

    Read The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics by Gary Zukov. It explains all of the developments in physics from the last century in non-technical language.

    I highly recommend the book, it is a winner of the American Book Award and truly will blow your mind...

  123. Audit or sit in on a university course by boster · · Score: 1
    In a subject as complex and prone to misunderstanding as physics, there is simply no substitute for having an actual human being do the explaining. Find out who the best local instructors are and try to sit in their lectures. I've never seen a physics text that is so clear that one would actually understand the material without being able to ask questions and/or get more explaination.

    Similarly, remember that all physics texts more or less require you to actually solve (or attempt to solve) the exercises. I do not mean you should do this in order to be the most earnest student. I mean that a great deal of material is often presented only in the exercises. (This is also true in Computer Science texts as well. It is probably a feature of any disciple where, at the end of the day, you actually have to solve problems.)

    Granted, sitting in on a university could can be hard to do if you have to work 9 to 5, or your local university is very strict about such things, but you might be surprised to know that most profs would probably more than welcome a student who was just there to learn, not tick off another requirement from their list.

    Texts: Get the Feynman Lectures. Then get a good intro text like a recent edition of University Physics by Sears, Zemanski and Young (I think it's now just "Young", who isn't) -- no reason to pay US$100 for the lastest one, go ahead and get the previous edition, I bet it's a lot cheaper. Then get a good Modern Physics text. For advanced stuff, I heard many good reviews of Understanding Quantum Physics by Michael A. Morrison (Univ. of Oklahoma) -- very readable compared to many such texts, possibly because the author has not only a Ph.D. in Physics, but also an advanced degree (Ph.D.? I don't recall) in English.

    --
    Madness takes its toll. Exact change please.
  124. Picture Books by bats · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The Cartoon Guide to Physics (Gonick and Huffman) and The New Way Things Work (Macaulay, Ardley) are both excellent books for a low-level introduction to physics. Both books present physics in an accurate, yet simplified way suitable for anyone past the 7th grade.

  125. Careful with Feynman Lectures by Mr.+Theorem · · Score: 2, Informative
    Most physicists find that the Feynman lectures are amazingly insightful books, but they are often unhelpful for the beginner. Feynman's class, upon which the books are based, was a disaster (read about it in the Feynman biography Genius).


    Whatever books you choose, remember that simply reading is not sufficient to really understand what's going on: you must work the exercises and problems. One of my professors once remarked to the class that "you haven't read a book until you've worked all the problems."


    Some books I haven't seen mentioned:

    • Experiments in Modern Physics, by Melissinos. Often used as a textbook in upper-level undergraduate labs. Dated but interesting.
    • Purcell's Electricity and Magnetism. Very nice, often used for the "honors" level introductory E&M
    • Walker's The Flying Circus of Physics although it's been a long time since I've looked at it
    • Cartoon Guide to Physics by Gonick and Huffman--also a long time since I've looked at it
    • Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles by Eisberg and Resnick. Although I thought this was terribly simplified for an upper level quantum mechanics course, it would be very good for a modern physics course.


    --
    *** Work like a king, command like a slave, create like a dog.
    1. Re:Careful with Feynman Lectures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, they were a disaster when presented as a freshman course. But remember being a freshman? Things of interest were probably 50% girls, 40% sports or chatting on irc (depending), which left about 10% for your studies. That's with a few exceptions (the people who go on to get first-class degrees).

      So, they Feynman lectures don't work on a bunch of people of varying motivation. But if you buy them with the burning intent to learn about physics from them, and the patience to stick with them and not to try to rush, then you should be fine.

    2. Re:Careful with Feynman Lectures by wormbin · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so quick to judge the freshmen guinea pigs who attended those first Feynman lectures. It was CalTech (not "party hard" state college) and it was the late fifties / early sixties. There's a decent chance the students were serious science nerds. They definitely weren't chatting on IRC. :)

  126. Asimov's Guide to Science by Bigboote66 · · Score: 1

    There is no better writer when it comes to explaining science. Although it covers a lot more than just physics, the broad coverage is useful when you want to follow up on information that leads you away from physics proper.

    The only disadvantage is that it is no longer in print, but thanks to the wonder of the internet, that's no longer a problem.

    -BbT

  127. Two good sources by Phrack · · Score: 1
    First, Issac Asimov wrote several introductory science texts that are all good reading. Any decent bibliography should turn them up.

    Also, Introducing Quantum Theory was an excellent read. Find it at Amazon, etc. It's part of a series of introductary titles of a range of subjects.

    --
    Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
  128. Concentrate on working problems! by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

    I see a lot of recommendations for excellent books that are essentially popularizations of physics. That's fine if all you want to do is feel like you understand the science. I would argue (and some may disagree) that you don't understand it if you're unable to actually apply your knowledge to actual problems.

    The only way to test and develop this skill is to work problems. It's slow and painful, but essential. No one (except in movies like Good Will Hunting) learns real science or math without working problems.

    My recommendations: quantum physics texts by J.J. Sakurai. Mechanics by Goldstein. I wish I knew a good statistical physics book with problems.

    1. Re:Concentrate on working problems! by jgerman · · Score: 2

      I second that. For mechanics I usually go with Tipler, but I honestly am not a good judge. It's what I used and ,not being a physicist, never experienced a wide range of texts.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  129. TEU: not really for beginners... by gosand · · Score: 2
    I have read The Elegant Universe, and I don't think you could say it is for beginners. And it doesn't deal with physics in general, it concentrates on Superstrings. It is a very good book, but a good Physics book? I don't know about that. I would say you could pick up a good used Physics textbook at a used bookstore. That should cover general physics. If you want to get "out there", or maybe "in here" a little more, pick up Godel Escher Bach by Hofstader. If you are more adventurous, try and read his book Metamagical Themas. I still can't believe I read that whole thing.

    Oh, and I make no claims to fully understanding any of the aforementioned books. They are all good reads, and I have read parts of them more than once. Understand them? Heh, I don't think so. I really like Hofstader's stuff.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  130. forget it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, forget it. I've spent years studying physics. it's not Linux or VB. you can't hope that you'll produce anything close to be valy=uable without years of studying that subject. years.

    start with the library, buy some basics books. if you get interested, then continue. don't be fooled with easiness of textbooks' picture of nature. it's greatly misleading. the reality is much more complex.

    there's a smallest chance that you'll achieve anything in physics. so, just forget it

  131. My best recommendation by dutky · · Score: 2

    A good overall Physics introduction for the non-technical reader is Physics for Poets by Robert March. It does an excellent job of covering the essentials of modern physics (from Gallileo to Heisenberg) without subjecting the reader to either too much mathematics (as with most good textbooks) or too many cartoons (as with most some popular science books).

    1. Re:My best recommendation by MlBruehlly · · Score: 1

      I have to second this recommendation. Having Bob March as my physics prof at the UW was a wonderful introduction to modern physics. His book is great for someone with a basic physics knowledge who wants to know more, but not get too technical.

  132. Beginner Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always found that experience is the best teacher for beginner physics. First off - Gravity - find an umbrella, next find a 2nd story window. Open window, open umbrella, JUMP. There ya go. The sound was your ankle breaking on the ground that you hit going around 9.8m/sec or so. Also you learned that an umbrella under no circumstances should be used as a deceleration device.
    -
    Next Inertia. Once your ankle has recovered of course. You will need a car for this experiment(not your own car!!!). Also you will need a very tight turn preferably one where you can reach speeds over 60mph. Give yourself several miles to warm up and to get your insurance in order. Make sure you get your speed up to at least 60 mph preferable 80mph and don't worry about the signs that say SLOW DOWN CURVE AHEAD. As you enter the turn and attempt to turn the car you will notice that the car does not want to turn. Instead the car wants to continue moving straight. No matter how hard you turn the wheel that damn car keeps going straight.
    did you survive that one. Maybe not. But you did learn some physics and more than likely a nomination for a 'darwin award'.
    Best of luck to you.

  133. Matter and Interactions by n1k · · Score: 0
    Matter and Interactions by Bruce Sherwood and Ruth Chabay is an excellent 2-book series covering college-level (ie. Calculus-based) Physics I and II (Mechanics and Electricity+Magnetism).

    The whole idea is to go from fundamental physical principles and derive everything. This is unlike high-school physics books which merely force you to accept various equations, while handwaving over the assumptions required to get their simplified result.

    I am a Physics Major. I have used both books in-class, and I keep them around because they're good, comprehensive Classical references.

    Hope this helps.

  134. Halliday and Resnick (was Feynman lectures) by dfung · · Score: 1

    This was the textbook that we had in my college introductory physics back at the dawn of time... I don't know if students in this decade/millenium (youch) still us it, but it was a classic back in 1980 (double youch).
    Fundamentals of Physics, by Halliday and Resnick.

    Online at Amazon here: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0471 105597/qid=1031606157/sr=8-3/ref=sr_8_3/102-784615 7-6024945?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

    It didn't cost $125 back then though.

    I didn't do the entire freshman physics course, but thought this was a good text with regard to not crushing me with advanced calculus that I was learning simultaneously in another class. It didn't seem gentle at the time, but I took a physical chemistry class later that proved to me that I had no future in math at all after about 3 sessions.

  135. Check your local university bookstore. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    The best place to get a broad foundation is probably the place that's designed to teach it to you.

    Visit your local university's bookstore, and pick up a first-year physics textbook, and probably a first-year calculus textbook too.

    These will keep you busy for months or years. I know I'm still looking through my physics text every now and then for interesting tidbits.

    As students enter university from a wide variety of backgrounds, the first-year texts start at an understandable level.

    1. Re:Check your local university bookstore. by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      You know, I studied physics that way in school, and it worked for me. But there is something just really depressing about the state of introductory physics textbooks.

      The truth of the matter is: there are only two introductory physics textbooks: Halliday & Resnick, and the Feynman lectures. The first is DULL, and the second is unusable. All others are ripoffs of H&R, not done as well.

      I really love physics, but first year physics is just damn boring, until you get to grad school and have it in your blood.

      Quantum mechanics is really great, too, but not because of all the Schroedinger's cat bullshit. (The measurement problem is not all the great philosophical mystery that the kiddie books talk about. It's tough, and QM coherence can still bend your mind, but it really isn't about the "nature of reality" in any kind of spiritual way.) QM is cool because it works so damn well at describing the world. I'm a condensed matter guy, so I don't care about the superstring/particle theory/cosmology stuff, but I get blown away thinking about how a laser or a transistor just does its thing, and we, as humans, understand it. I imagine if I had been messed up enough to go into high-energy physics, I'd get the heebie-jeebies thinking about all those collisions and particle jets, and how we understand all these particles that would just be fantasies except for the fact that for a few billion dollars, you can make your own.

      Stat mech and thermo just rock. Classical, yet quantum, at the same time, and it's in your fridge, too.

      And good old classical mechanics: I don't get into the formalism, but Isaac Newton, what a man. For thousands of years, people had seen things fall to the ground, and people had watched the moon and planets go around the sky, and it took the towering genius of Newton to say something that today seems so obvious: maybe these are the same thing. Can you fathom how much this changes things: the heavens and the earth obey the same laws---not one set for beneath the sky, and another set for above the sky, but one set of laws for the whole shebang. Take that, Aristotle.

      Man, this stuff is just great. I could go on for days.

      Feynman tried to get some of the excitement going by bringing up quantum mechanics much earlier than most textbooks, but he still had to deal with Maxwell's equations and all the math, and it just is too much to take in the dose that he prescribes.

      Physics is great, but it's tough. Maybe there isn't any royal road to geometry, but a first-year textbook just isn't what it is about.

      I guess what I'm saying is, you need to do the equivalent amount of work either way, but it is a shame that there isn't a text that gets you to the excitement instead of just making sure you've got the chops to understand Newton's laws, free-body diagrams, and the basic laws of electromagnetism.

    2. Re:Check your local university bookstore. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      The truth of the matter is: there are only two introductory physics textbooks: Halliday & Resnick, and the Feynman lectures. The first is DULL, and the second is unusable. All others are ripoffs of H&R, not done as well.

      I hear you re. the Feynman lectures. Weren't those originally grad lectures, or am I off-base?

      My physics text is the Tipler book, which was both understandable and engaging (but then, I'm a wierdo who likes this kind of thing and breezed through the first year or two of calculus). YMMV.

    3. Re:Check your local university bookstore. by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      The Feynman lectures were originally given to Cal Tech undergrads. The lectures were also accompanied by the semi-standard "tutorials" (i.e., smaller classroom meetings) led by course assistants, and problem sets.

      The lectures themselves were pitched too high for most (but not all) of the pretty sophisticated Cal Tech undergrads, who started not showing up, but grad students and professors *started* showing up for the lectures, which kept the room pretty full anyhow.

      Tipler is the one I learned first year physics from, too, and I don't have any major objection. It is one of the bazillion H&R "ripoffs," by which I mean the pedagogical approach is pretty much the same. Some of the ripoffs are more usable than H&R, mainly because the H&R problems are rather difficult.

  136. free introductory physics books by ibex42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can find free introductory physics books at www.lightandmatter.com They are downloadable as pdfs.

  137. Spoiler!! by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory" by Brian Greene. excellent read (although I'm only halfway through - there might be plot twists that I don't know about. ;)

    At the very end, you never do find out the true nature of the universe. The author just leaves you hanging in an obvious lead-in for the sequel: "Elegant Universe II: The Wrath of God".

    GMD

  138. Hyperspace and Visions by retromad · · Score: 1

    I would suggest both of these books by Michio Kaku and also Paradigms revisted by John L. Casti. All have proved to be great mind churners.

  139. Mr Tompkins by George Gamow by The+Evil+Dwarf+from · · Score: 1

    While the Feynman, Hawking, Herbert, Wheeler,.. books are more widely known, the Mr. Tompkins series of articles explains a lot of elementray physics in the most unusual format I have encountered.
    Mr. Tompkins is a layman who experiences physics through a series of dreams derived from seeing lectures in physics. The articles were first written in 1940 and updated in 65, but they are still very pertinent.

    Mr. Tompkins in Paperback

    1. Re:Mr Tompkins by George Gamow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful. There is a big error in Mr Tompkins which will make you look really daft. Mr Tompkins, while in Relativity land, observes people expand or contract as they move past him close to the (much reduced) speed of light. This is bogus; you would /observe/ them to rotate due to the geometrical effects of being in 3 dimensions not just 1. (The other 2 components of the motion, which are not Lorentz-contracted, contribute to what you see.) Gamow didn't notice this till someone pointed it out to him after the book was published. It's a shame because otherwise the book is really quite good.

  140. Physics Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want books that you can read for fun, but that also contain a lot of solid physics, I can recommend the following:

    "The Second Creation", by Robert Crease and Charles Mann - contains a history of particle physics, from Becquerel to superstrings.

    "The Making of the Atomic Bomb", by Richard Rhodes - a Pulitzer Prize winner - the first 400 pages or so contain a detailed history of nuclear physics.

    "The First Three Minutes", by Steven Weinberg - about the Big Bang, Nucleosynthesis, and all that. Great little book.

    "The Character of Physical Law", by Feynman - it's great if you like Feynman.

    "Einstein's Universe", by Nigel Caldwell (I believe) - a solid book about the experimental consequences of General Relativity.

    If you just want to learn quantum mechanics you could try David Bohm's book on the subject. It's easy to follow and also contains a discussion of the probability interpretation of quantum mechanics, which I haven't seen anywhere else.

    Hope this helps.

    Guglielmo

  141. Surely the finest physics book available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is The Cartoon Guide to Physics, by Larry Gonick. I would recommend it for everyone
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/det ail/-/0062 731009/qid=1031606611/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/002-425889 0-9035212?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

  142. Learn maths by madprof · · Score: 1

    Sounds silly but without learning the maths behind physics it is meaningless.

  143. string theory by navster · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.superstringtheory.com/ They give you and option to choose whether you are [basic/advanced], and the material they present is pretty good.

    --
    Sanity is not statistical - 1984
  144. Great book by MaceSoul · · Score: 1

    Quantum Physics and the Language of Nature by Heinz Pagels is a great book for beginners.

  145. Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as your math is up to snuff (Calc, Vector Calc, Diff-Eqs), Robert Resnick's "Quantum Physics" is the bible in colleges for undergraduates.

  146. A couple of my favs . . . by vlvtelvis · · Score: 1

    Try Reichenbach's "From Copernicus to Einstein." It's an awesome history of physics that's under 200 pages.

    Another book that sounds exactly like what you're looking for is Alan Wolf's "Taking the Quantum Leap: The New Physics for non-scientists."

    I'd also suggest reading lots of science fiction. You can learn more about physics from reading David Brin than you can in an intro university physics class.

  147. There isn't just one book by necama · · Score: 1

    If you want a good understanding of most of the stuff posted here about physics, then you really need a good background in some specific specialty in physics, like astro or semiconductor physics.

    If you're interested in semiconductors, for instance, you'll want a good set of books for basic physics, then E&M, quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, and finally a good book on many body problems (a.k.a. condensed matter physics). In many cases, the textbooks are behind the times (especially for quantum and condensed matter), and the only way to really catch up is to read the research articles themselves.

    Astro requires a lot of the same subjects (and a hefty dose of GR and optics to boot). Cosmology gets even crazier.

    But, for the classical stuff, a list is fairly easy to provide:

    Freshman Physics: (pick any single set, but understand calculus first)
    Feynman Lectures
    Halliday and Resnick
    Serway
    Sears and Zemansky

    E+M
    Griffiths (good all around book)
    Jackson (only for the hardcore)
    Landau and Lifshitz

    Classical Field Theory
    Marion and Thornton
    Goldstein
    Landau and Lifshitz

    Quantum Mechanics
    To my knowledge there isn't a really good quantum book that doesn't require some foreknowledge of the subject, although I've been told that Dirac's book is readable.

    Statistical Mechanics
    Goodstein (quite readable, light on the math)

    Condensed Matter
    Kittel
    Ashcroft and Mermin

    GR
    Schultz

    And, just because it's so important, Math
    Boaz
    Arfken and Weber
    Carrier, Krook and Pearson

    Mind you, the books I just outlined probably cost in excess of a thousand dollars if you buy them all. The big problem is, physics is a big area to want to understand, and a working knowledge of the subject requires years of dedication to that goal.

    1. Re:There isn't just one book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum Mechanics
      To my knowledge there isn't a really good quantum book that doesn't require some foreknowledge of the subject, although I've been told that Dirac's book is readable.


      Shankar, Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Good as an intro, good for grad level, it's generally great.

      And for GR - Schultz is extremely basic! Go for Wald.

    2. Re:There isn't just one book by necama · · Score: 1

      I was just going off of the books I have on the shelf. I've perused Shankar, but, like Sakurai, it just seems to skip too many basic ideas, and delves into the Hamiltonian formulation of quantum without discussing the consequences at length. Frankly, the best quantum book I've used was a professor's notes on the subject.

      And I agree that Shultz is basic, but it is a good introduction book. I've never seen Wald, so I can't comment on it.

    3. Re:There isn't just one book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For GR don't bother with anything until you have good enough maths to cope with "Gravity" by Misner, Wheeler and Thorne. This book is the bible to anyone who really knows GR. You'll need to be very good at maths before getting anywhere with it but no-one said GR was easy.

  148. Not a book per se, but audiobook by Marooned · · Score: 1

    Einstein's relativity and the quantum revolution, from the teaching co., is an excellent "intro" type of lecture series by a real professor, and it's the best physics "class" i've ever taken. Most (if not all ) the teaching co.'s audiobooks are great for learning outside the classroom with a real professor (and no homework too :)

    --
    ------ Poo-tee-weet?
  149. The Feynman Lectures by pestel · · Score: 1

    enuf said

    okay, written by Richard Feynman - probably the best physics textbook ever written for student understanding

  150. Light and Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try www.lightandmatter.com This is exceptionally good introductory material! Many have commented that the Feynman lectures are good. They are indeed good, but they are not introductory. Have a look at the pdf files at light and matter before springing for the Feynman books. If light and matter is too easy for you, then the Feynman books might be more your speed.

  151. Great Authors by Tharant · · Score: 1

    Try The World Treasury of Physics, Astronomy, and Mathematics

    Excerpts from Einstein, Feynman, Schwinger, Hawking, Turing, von Neumann, etc.

    -tharant

  152. A bit old school but still a favorite of mine by pmancini · · Score: 2

    There are some great suggestions already mentioned here but, unless I missed it, no one has mentioned my favorite text book:

    Newtonian Mechanics (The M. I. T. Series) by A. P. French, W. W. Norton, 1971. ISBN 0-393-09970-9.

    Still one of my all time favorites for it's clarity, exercises and readability.

    --Peter

  153. Re:Halliday and Resnick--"Fundamentals of Physics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good thing, I think, since the real meat of physics is based on calculus.

    Funny - I always thought the real meat of physics was based on principal bundles, gauge theory, and the functional integral. Oh well.

  154. Real-life experience with silicone by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can also ask any one of her past boyfriends about the malleable properties of silicone -- an important part of semiconductors.

    GMD

  155. physics textbooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the better textbooks if you have at least calculus is Sommerfeld's Lectures on Physics. There are 6 volumes starting with mechanics. Feynman lectures are good, but dont give a very good method for solving problems. He was too smart.

  156. A little levity is a good place to start by Modab · · Score: 1
    Okay, this is more general science than just physics, but for those who want to learn in the fun way, try The Science of Discworld, by Terry Pratchett. It sounds light, but the concepts, though skimmed over (appropriate for a book that tackles many branches of science), are well thought out.

  157. for general bs conversastion... by cpex · · Score: 1

    www.howstuffworks.com now you wont get a full understanding of physics here, but when a article comes up on slashdot and you find yourself srcatching your head just got there search for whatever is confusing you and return to slashdot with enough knowledge to bs your way around the topic. Seriously how many people on slashdot really understand general relativity and quantum mechanics beyond the basics, sure most of us have had an intro physics class and talked about relatvity and quantum but hey most of us do not have a physics phd. And we all spit out our bs and 99% of it is just wrong anyways. Oh shoot now I am giving away my secret

  158. Asimov:Understanding Physics by Raiford · · Score: 1

    Understanding Physics by Issac Asimov:It may be too much for the lay person if you already have some background in physics but the writing is incredibly lucid.

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  159. feynman and others by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    hawking, feynman, gribbin. good good good. all on my shelf.

    everyone recommends six easy pieces but might I suggest that you be sure and get the audio of the lectures. I taught myself to rollerblade while listening to Feynman explain everything else. do note though that the first lecture sounds somewhat crappy due to the original source material. but the other five are dandy and Feynman is a funny guy.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  160. Introduction to Particle Physics by SoftwareTechie · · Score: 1

    Try these articles on Particle Physics
    -----------------------

    --
    Political Correctness is doubleplusungood.
  161. John Gribbin by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 1

    I have read quite a number of layman's Physics books, and I think that John Gribbin's are amongst the most accessible. He writes clearly and consicely, but also has some color to his style. He is also quite the polymath, and has written books on a broad range of Physics sub-categories and some other topics too.

    If you're interested in cosmology at all, then I would highly recommend Hyperspace by Michio Kaku. The middle of the book is a quite meaty, but as a whole the book is a good read.

    And since you mentioned cheapskates, there's abebooks.com, which is a site just for those of us that don't particularly want new books, and would rather support some independet retailers.

  162. Check out www.theassayer.org by xerofud · · Score: 1

    There are lots of great free books on many topics there. I recall in particular several introductory level physics texts including one by Prof. Firk, who by all accounts was a fantastic teacher at Yale in his day.

    www.theassayer.org

  163. by the master writer Asimov by KingPrad · · Score: 1
    The best comprehensive but easy to read physics primer I've read was written by Isaac Asimov. Asimov was known for clear, understandable writing, and this book demonstrates his mastery.

    It is in 3 volumes (sections is a better term than volumes): Mechanics, Optics, and Modern (relativity, quantam mechanics). Very easy to read, and he makes the material very easy to grasp, providing some historical notes and plenty of easy-to-visualize thought experiments. Even for a pretty educated fellow (in physics at least) this is a fun and educational read, because it brings a lot of information together without bogging down.

    It can be picked up for about 7 bucks used at Amazon if you search for Asimov: Understanding Physics. Definitely grab a copy.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  164. The God Particle by Myrv · · Score: 2


    The God Particle by L Lederman is definitely a must read if you want to learn about particle physics. It's very easy to follow and has maybe two equations in the entire book. Lederman spends as much time talking about the history of particle physics (and his role in it -- awarded Nobel prize in 1988) as about the actual science itself. The story about them ripping apart some poor grad students just completed cloud chamber in the heat of the moment was particularly amuzing.

  165. usenet by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
    http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics

    for the usenet pysics FAQ, and the assosiated newsgroup.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  166. RE:A good overall Coverage by CerebralPanic · · Score: 1

    I have done an applied physics degree and am currently finishing my Phd in physics. My University physics bible was Sears,Zamansky and Young. (8th Edition Now I think). Covers everything including quantum mechanics and relativity. Also has good descriptions and excellent examples. Anything more technical than this and your spending AUD $100+ for a particular subject per book, Just My 2c :)

  167. Tipler by wormbin · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I decided to tackle physics. I had only taken a couple courses in school (now ten years ago) and I was curious for more.

    I read Hawking's popular books: Brief History of Time, etc. While these gave me the gee whiz we live in a weird universe feeling they didn't really help me to understand any of it. I was looking for that light-bulb-over-my-head feeling when you actually understand something.

    Next I cracked my old college textbook. This was a mistake as my text lacked clarity, thorough examples, and diagrams to make learning easy. I went to the university and browsed all the available textbooks and one stood above the rest Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Paul Tipler. It's a great book. The only disadvantage is that you need a basic understanding of calculus. This isn't so bad because I'm not sure if you can really understand physics without understanding calculus anyway.

    A few people have recommended Feynmann's lectures. Feynmann turns a first year physics course on its' head by changing the order and methods that most topics are presented. This is great if you are having trouble understanding the traditional methods but can also be very confusing to a first time physics student. The lectures are a great resource in addition to a standard textbook but I wouldn't recommend them as your sole book.

    1. Re:Tipler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're actually a first-time student they're fine. His order is rather better than the standard ordering as it's designed to build everything up solidly.
      If you've already done some basic bits of a course and turn to Feynman I can see how it would get confusing. But it's really everybody else's fault for not teaching Thermodynamics sooner. Thermodynamics really is essential; it's far more worthwhile getting Feynman and learning Thermodynamics properly (taught pretty well because he teaches it so early in his course that he can't really assume anything) than crapping about with modern concepts like relativity or quantum mechanics before you're ready. A good understanding of Thermodynamics will give you a better gut feel for the rest of physics than anything else I can think of.

    2. Re:Tipler by wormbin · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right and the problem is due to the order we learn physics topics from high school and earlier. It would be interesting to see how someone with no physics training takes to the lectures. Unfortunately, from a practical standpoint that may not even be possible.

      From Feynman's preface to the lectures:

      ... The question, of course, is how well this experiment [the new physics lectures] has succeeded. My own point of view--which, however, does not seem to be shared by most of the people who worked with the students--is pessimistic. When I look at the way the majority of the students handled the problems on the examinations, I think the system was a failure. ...

  168. Well, in that case... by errxn · · Score: 1

    ain't there fixin' to be alot more acceptance of substandard English up in da hizzouse? I don't mean to dis' nobody, but you be talkin' some wack shiznit, know what I'm sayin'?

    Word up, y'all!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  169. Cartoon, Feynman, and Dover by fermion · · Score: 2
    First, try the Cartoon Guide to Physics. This is kind of a silly book, but is at least as accurate as the other pop physics stuff. It will give you a good explanation of basic physics.

    Second, Feynman has a book called the Character of Physical Law. This is an excellent series of lectures on the process and history of physics. It is a must read for anyone who wishes to know physics. It is much more accessible than the Lectures on Physics, which are much more suited to the serious student.

    Third, any book by Dover Publishing is a good bet. These books are usually reprints of historical or definitive texts. They have books on subjects such as Quantum Theory, Crystallography, Relativity, and Thermodynamics, often by the scientist that defined the field. Remember, basic physical concepts are not quickly refuted, so a book written 50 years ago is still a good resource.

    All of these books are available from your favorite book outlet, or do a search.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  170. Purcell by streak · · Score: 1

    A very good (tho dense) intro text on E&M
    is "Electricity and Magnetism" by Purcell.
    I recommend it if you really want to learn the basics of E&M.

  171. MOD PARENT UP INFORMATIVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That 3-in-1 Asmiov book is the feckin' dogs bollocks, I can tell you. You can push through the whole thing and learn all kinds of cool physics/chemistry stuff, or you can just dip into it whenever you feel like it. Get it, it's well worth it.

  172. For the Teenaged Set by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2
    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  173. Michio Kaku! by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I picked up his books years back, and they are all great. Most are very easy going reads, if you are into reading about physics. He uses a lot of good analogies that get your mind working.

    Here's a BN.com link:
    http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/result s.asp?WRD=michio+kaku&userid=529XSYBO5D

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  174. Dyson's "Disturbing the Universe", Rhodes' A-Bomb by goingware · · Score: 2
    No, not Esther Dyson, her father Freeman Dyson wrote Disturbing the Universe.

    In part it's a history of physics from World War II onward, in part it's a look into one physicists love of the subject.

    I found it inspiring.

    I have a B.A. in Physics from UC Santa Cruz.

    I also recommend the Feynman Lectures if you want to actually understand the material. I think they're very readable. You will need to know some differential and integral calculus to be able to understand them, but you will need those for any real physics textbook - Newton invented calculus in order to study physics.

    Finally, Richard Rhodes' The Making of the Atomic Bomb is just an astounding book. It's a history of physics from the 20's or so up through the 50's. It really communicates the feelings of the times.

    After reading it I found myself saying "I could do that" and finally got it together to go back to school and finish my Physics degree - I should have graduated in '86 but didn't graduate until '93.

    --
    -- Could you use my software consulting serv
  175. Good Books by (v)Jargon(v) · · Score: 1

    Anything by Richard Feynman, esp. Six Easy Pieces, & QED. Schrodinger's Kittens is also a good and mind boggling book, including Elegant Universe. I also recommend Hawking's latest book, The Universe in a Nutshell, its a good read and has a lot of pretty pictures.

  176. IAAP and for Quantum Theory I . . . by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    would advise you to read 'Quantum Reality' by Nick Herbert. It is the *only* lay explanation of the subject I have ever read actually worth a damn in terms of the actual physics involved. Virtually all of the other books being recomended here are good reads, but I wouldn't call them physics at all. My interpretation of your question is that you want to go beyond that sort of book. Read Herbert's book, pay attention, and you'll have a better understanding of the state of quantum physics then some physicists I know. All without a drop of math too.

    For "good reads," rather than good physics, try:

    Steven Weinberg's 'Dreams of a Final Theory." A good look by a real physicist at where some people are trying to take physics.

    What's physics without a little math? David Berlinski has done the impossible and written a *book*, not a text book, a *BOOK* about the calculus. 'Tour of the Calculus.' Loverly little bit of work. Thank you David.

    Someone else mentioned 'The God Particle." I'll second that. Most books on physics talk about theory or "gee whiz" stuff. This is simply an anecdotal telling of the real life of a hardcore experimental physicist. Well worth the read.

    For more elementary physics there are already umptynine recommendations for the Feynman Lectures, all moded up to +5. Who am I to object?

    BUT: Whatever you do don't miss Feynman's anecdotal books, 'What do you care what People Think?' and 'Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!'

    They have absolutely nothing to do with physics, per se, and yet at the same time seem to have everything to do with physics, plus they'll be the most fun you have reading this year, and maybe next.

    You want to get a little more hardcore? Get 'Physics' by Hallidy & Resnick. Read 'em. Learn 'em ( and all the relevant math). Work all the problems. Congratulations, you're an A.S. in physics.

    There are some online sites for physics but I've never warmed up to them. You need the books, you need to be able to open the page, read a bit, put it down and ponder, go for a walk and ponder some more, pick the book back up, read a couple more pages, go "hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm," take it to bed, read a few more pages and fall asleep with visions of quarks dancing in your head.

    You need the bloody books. Buy them, steal them, whatever you have to do to *possess* them. Keep them as treasured Holy objects. You won't regret it.

    KFG

  177. Isnt it spelled "dammit"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just checking.

    1. Re:Isnt it spelled "dammit"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, damn it, it's not.

  178. A "real" book that's not hard by ccampb · · Score: 1

    One of the best physics books I've read is "Space and Time in Special Relativity", by N. David Mermin. It was the Special Relativity (SR) textbook in my freshman physics course and is definitely a physics book rather than a book on physics; thankfully it also has tons of prose explanations.

    SR is great to learn for those interested in some serious dabbling in physics, because while the implications are quite cool/profound (rulers flying past your head at .9c get shorter, etc), the math really isn't that difficult and the logic is very straightforward.

  179. Free online e-book by SergeyI · · Score: 1

    www.motionmountain.org

  180. The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted, somebody mentioned this earlier... but only in a passing reference and I felt it deserved a lot more discussion.

    The long story short: It's a book by a liberal arts major for liberal arts majors, but without dumbing down the material.

    Beatiful. Well-written. And examples that even I, a lowly history major, could comprehend. Not that I would say that I fully understand the book or the concept. But this helped a million times over.

  181. MOD THIS UP!!! by furiousgeorge · · Score: 2

    Yup - Serway is excellent. I'm still using it as an occasional reference years after university.

    This was going to be my suggestion - go to a used bookstore or university bookstore and buy textbooks instead of most of the things being suggested here. Sure "Brief History in Time" is interesting, but there isn't much in the way of detail.... it's lots of handwaving but very slim on actual facts and concrete concepts. It's the stuff of magazine articles but not something to really LEARN from.

    Go find a textbook - they are meant to teach. And you can find used ones generally very cheap.

  182. Kaku, Abbott, Stewart by MConlon · · Score: 1

    Off the top of my head... besides Feynman, and Hawking, "Hyperspace" by Michio Kaku is a nice one, as are "Flatland" (Abbott) and "Flatterland" (Stewart).

    MJC

  183. Book by Einstein for non-techies by mrbubba · · Score: 1

    short review from a web site:

    Albert Einstein and Leopold Infeld. The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1938. A very readable yet often overlooked nontechnical summary of the physics and its origins.

    I have this book, which describes complicated physics with simple metaphors. Plus, it's by the man himself!!

    --
    my hobbies include space walks, ether chugging contests and marathon sleep contests.
  184. Also... by MConlon · · Score: 1

    (Remembered another one.)

    "The Universe and Dr. Einstein" if you can find it.

    MJC

  185. For Quantum Mechanics by boskone · · Score: 1

    In Search of Schrodinger's Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality
    by John Gribbin

    good, easy to read even for non scientist types. Also, I've heard some of Hawking's stuff is great but haven't read any.

  186. Textbooks by hal+incandenza · · Score: 1
    I'm just starting graduate school in physics, and while I think many of the books mentioned so far are quite good (Greene and Feynman especially so), it's at least worth mentioning some of the more readable textbooks out there. The best way to get a feel for the concepts of a field like quantum mechanics is to actually get your hands dirty; the obvious drawback of this approach is that it takes time.

    Another drawback is that textbooks tend to lose something in the readability category, although physicists are fortunate enough to have some fairly lucid undergraduate-level texts. David Griffiths in particular is quite a good author. His texts on Quantum Mechanics and Electrodynamics are reasonably in-depth with a focus on physical intuition over mathematical rigor, and are written in a manner that is accessible and (if you're a nerd like me) even entertaining. You should be able to get either at any decent library.

  187. Hmm here's where to start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First you need to understand the basics i.e. classical physics with some brief introduction to quantum mechanics, this book will do:

    Mansfield, O'Sullivan: Understanding Physics, Wiley 1998

    Then you need something about the structure of matter:

    Brehm, Mullin: Introduction to the Structure of Matter

    And finally you can take some introductory text on quantum mechanics:

    Liboff: Introductory Quantum Mechanics

    Then you need to know some linear algebra and functional analysis from mathematics. These will do (though this stuff could be read before anything else):

    Kreyszig: Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications, Wiley
    Shilov: Linear Algebra, Dover Publications

    Now you can start approaching the real thing. And of course everything assumes you know multivariable calculus. Those books are what covers the first 2 years of physics studies at Helsinki University of Technology (with the addition of Shilov's book, because it's as good as the book we should read and it costs a 1/3).

  188. Physics for Poets. by UnhandledException · · Score: 1

    It's a classroom book, college freshman level. It's got great explanations of concepts with almost no math. Very good book.

    It's a small paperback, so I don't think it's worth the >$50 price bn.com has for it. Check Amazon.com's used books or ebay.

  189. Forget about physics without math--almost by Timwit · · Score: 1

    Except for the most basic physics, there can be almost no meaningful discussion about the subject without college level math. There are many physics books written for the layman dealing with relativity, quantum mechanics, and other "modern physics" topics, but any critical reader will be disappointed by them. All these books can do is describe physics by way of analogy, and frankly, the analogies just don't cut it. Even *with* a little college level math thrown in, it would be tough to cover these subjects in any meaningful way without something resembling a textbook. Physics is based on a hierarchy of definitions and related mathematical machinery, and although the final laws are often expressed as very simple equations, knowing what they mean requires a discussion of the lower level concepts.

    Despite that, it *is* possible to explain *some* of the concepts without math. One example would be the nature of quantum mechanical uncertainly, known as the Copenhagen interpretation of the wave function. There is value in understanding that, though it isn't enough to get the big picture.

    I have read many layman's physics books, written both by famous and unknown authors, and there is only one I recommend:

    _The Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics As the Language of Nature_, by Heinz R. Pagels.

    This relatively unknown book is a real gem. You can buy it at Amazon for eight bucks.

  190. Quantum Mechanics indeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice and subtle there calling us all monkeys with regards to Quantum Mechnaics (not that it's not true). Quantum Mechanics is something the leading minds could brush up on...it's a bit of a nebulous and contradictory field at the moment. Eventually a "Unified Theory of Everything" will fix it though or at least make it consistent with Einstein.

  191. A Brief History of Time lost me when ... by edgarde · · Score: 1
    ... black holes emit radiation due to some quantum occurrance near the event horizon (I guess). This happens? thinks I, going thru the early chapters, where quantum physics is mentioned briefly, but not enough that this new concept makes any more sense than "quantum = poof man like just outta nowhere". I wish someone had caught that cos it kinda blew the story for me. That said ...

    Hawking does an admirable (and concise) job of recapping scientific thought since ancient Greece, and explains principles such as the need for scientific theories to be falsifiable. This intro is really good for the science newbie and wasn't boring (in my opinion).

    A lot of the book's detractors have expressed a problem with concepts such as "imaginary numbers" -- people who can't handle junior college math don't have a chance with physics. I wouldn't let that dissuade you from reading ABHoT.

    For what it's worth, the movie is basicly about Hawking -- the man, the chair, the speech synthesizer -- and reduces the science to passing gee whizzery.

  192. Thanks for the plug by manobes · · Score: 2

    but just to be clear, my name is Matt.

    The articles are linked on my website.

    1. Re:Thanks for the plug by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Heh, sorry about the mix-up. If k5 was up at a faster speed when I posted, I woulda put straight links and gotten all the info correct. My apologies, again.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  193. Physics for Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone heard of this series of books- Physics for Entertainment? They are out of print but there are still copies of the whole series of 3 or 4 books still floating around. Read them during middle school days and they were indeed fun.

  194. Quantum: Longing for the Harmonies by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    I found this to be a very approachable look at quantum physics. By Wilczek and Devine, if I recall correctly. I don't know how outdated it'll be today, I had my nose in it almost a decade ago.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  195. Intro. Physics Texts by Stranger4U · · Score: 1

    For a beginning text, I would recommend Halliday, Resnick, and Walker. It's by far the best (college freshman level) intro. text book I've ever seen for physics. For something of higher level (such as quantum mechanics) there are always the Griffiths books. I would recommend a text book as opposed to a popular media book (such as QED or Brief History of Time) because text books tend to be more complete, whereas popular books try to hit the interesting subjects.

  196. Phyz.org by Militant+Pedestrian · · Score: 1

    Phyz.org is run by my physics teacher, Dean Baird. He has his whole 'Book of Phyz' posted in PDF format online there. Check it out!

  197. Math by Fished · · Score: 1

    Just remember: physics without Math is like beer without alcohol. It may look good, taste good, and go down good, but at the end of the day it won't do anything for you.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
  198. Physics as a Series of Games by jonathanweaver · · Score: 1

    For quick, digestible physics snacks, check out Lew Epstein's masterpiece, "Gedanken Physics".

  199. Another book by Fifster · · Score: 1

    The best physics-theory-for-the-layperson books that I've /ever/ read are 'Hyperspace' by Dr. Michio Kaku and 'Beyond Einstein' by Kaku as well. I highly recommend them!

  200. Physics Books by bgitac · · Score: 1

    I agree that Hawking's books are excellent. For anyone interested in particle accelerators, The God Particle by Leon Lederman is an interesting read. Also, Steven Weinberg's Dreams of a Final Theory discusses some of the implications of modern physics. The New World of Mr. Tompkins by George Gamow and Russell Stannard is the tale of a layman on a quest for knowledge of modern science - funny and informative.

  201. Quantum Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two great perspectives are;Stalking the wild pendulum, and The Dancing Wu-Li Masters. Not Mathematically intensive BUT extremely thought provoking. Accessable language and readable.

  202. Re:Any of the Feynman Lectures ... will kill you! by noshellswill · · Score: 0

    However, as the books FORWARD expresses, only two-dozen out of the first 200 student (at CalTek) taught from the LECTURES got a clue. RF explains that only those who don't need to be educated can be ... so watch your azz. The elementary stuff is presented without coddling. 'Course RF sez he never understood QM till he re-formulated entire mess in a Lagrangian motif. But then ... K-V or K+V what-the-heh ...

  203. Asimov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isaac Asimov's "Understanding Physics" is a good book. It's short on mathematics and long on descriptions, and intended to explain physics concepts in non-technical terms.

  204. Pedant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've seen alot of Physics articles posted"

    No, you haven't. You have seen "a lot" of Physics articles posted. There is no such word as "alot", gdict has no record of such a thing nor does my English dictionary. "A lot" however has meaning and two words involved.

    *sigh*

  205. To newbies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should start by going through all university math courses. After that, take a look at quantum mechanics. It needs quite a bit of functional analysis skills.

  206. Feinman for the Layman by Ikkyu · · Score: 1

    I would recomend "6 Easy Pieces" and it's follow up "6 Not So Easy Pieces" by Feinman. They give a nice overview of some important concepts and are aimed at the layman (liberal arts major).

  207. Excellent choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to be (-1 redundant) and recommend them myself. I also highly recommend "Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions" by Edwin A. Abbott. It's the book about extra-dimensional space for those who don't quite grasp the concept. It's an easy read, and it's a classic from the late 1800s. Also, "The Fourth Dimension" by Rucker is essential for delving deeper into hyperdimensional string theory. It picks up the story of A-square a hundred years later, and adds a lot of new discoveries in science to the extra-dimensional quest.

  208. Read "Scientific American" Articles! by tiohero · · Score: 1
    Read older "Scientific American" magazine articles between approx. 1950..1985. (They were truly excellent back then!) In my experience there is no better way to learn modern physics aside from taking university courses.

    Having a physics degree, I've gone through practically all the standard books at one time or another. "Feynman Lectures" are well respected, but take a long time to read and absorb. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible for most people to teach themselves this field with any serious rigor from textbooks without the benefit of a class. It requires intensive problem sets and LOTS of time. You probably aren't so interested in learning to solve differential equations, rather you want the core science. "Scientific American" provides that.

    The 1950 and early 1970's "Scientific American" articles were written at a surprisingly high level. They'll provide introductory material appropriate for the "average" scientist/engineer and push into theoretical and experimental details that are appropriate for PhD's working in the field. The key equations are provided and explained without overly obscuring mathematics. The articles are written by the top scientists in their respected fields and often provide subtle understanding and real-world implementation of ideas that you never obtain from textbooks. The information density of the articles is much higher than from most other sources, so it is a very efficient method of learning. The older articles were definitely intended for professional scientists so they can be a challenging read. The 1950's and 60's articles are so theoretical, they could easily be used as basis for college courses.

    You will learn the theory behind whatever physics topic interests you and can follow developments over several decades to understand how theory develops into experiments and get a sense of future directions in the field. The chronological development of the topic combined with re-enforcement of basic theories make this an extremely compelling method of teaching yourself.

    For instance, although I've taken a number of courses in particle physics, most of my working knowledge of the field, including the "Standard Model" and "String Theory" has come directly from reading and re-reading old Scientific American's. I can say that I've developed very solid understanding of those topics from reading S.A. articles, something that none of my textbooks came close to providing.

    You'll quickly find that "Scientific American" is an invaluable resource for learning physics. (And lots of other science.) Check it out!

  209. The Feynman Lectures on Physics - Audio Books by ddruker · · Score: 1

    An earlier poster mentioned the feynman lectures on physics. As opposed to buying the book, you can download mp3 files of the actual lectures themselves on any gnutella or kazaa network client. There is a basic series of 7 or so topics, plus an advanced series. Search on "Feynman" in Kazaa or a gnutella client like Bearshare or Limewire and you'll find many many sources for the audio of these lectures. I think it's fascinating to listen to the feynman lectures and then to download and listen to Stephen Hawking's stuff to get a real sense of what the best minds in physics were thinking about, 50 years apart.

  210. Totem Books has a great series... by remember_beos · · Score: 1

    look for 'Introducing Physics' published by Totem books (they're British if i recall). they've got a great series of quick reads about everything under the sun. very shallow read but hits most every point - good to help you figure out exactly what it is you don't know.

    --
    - im just sick of fixing windows all the time -
  211. Serious text by bkrrrrr · · Score: 1

    For a serious text, if you can do math, I liked Eisberg & Resnick's "Quantum Physics" OK. It was the text for our 2nd year "modern physics" courses. This is a course text, and not some fluffy gee-wiz technobabble pop-literature crap about black holes and alternate universes and such. How it will help you with Slashdot news postings is unclear. It's about atoms, spectroscopy, quantum mechanics, statistical mechanics, elementary particles and such. Broad, basic and wordy, which makes it a nice intro.

  212. For a good foundation in physics by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

    So what's some good reading material for Physics that will give you a good, solid foundation if you've missed something, and then give you some additional stuff?

    Do you really want a SOLID foundation? Then learn high school level calculus first and then be prepared for hard work. Reading popular physics books for laymen will not give you a solid foundation but a rough intuitive idea of the important concepts in physics. For a solid foundation, you need to do read good technical books on physics, and practice problem solving for at least one year.

    Physics is a vast subject. If you want to develop a solid ability to use physics for understanding macroscopic everyday mechanical, thermodynamic or electrical/magnetic phenomena both qualitatively and quantitatively, then read good foundantion books on classical physics. I would recommend Physics by Halliday and Resnick vols. 1,2 for its lucidity and excellent problem set.
    Remember that as in many other fields, including programming, practice makes perfect. Repeated practice of solving a well-chosen variety of toy problems makes you proficient in thinking physics and using it. Resnick and Halliday has an excellent problem set in this regard.

    For understanding and solving problems related to quantum phenomena, start by reading a good introductory book on Quantum Mechanics. The following well-written books with practice problems are among the most popular in undergraduate physics courses:
    1. Principles of Quantum Mechanics - By Ramamurthi Sankar
    2. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics - David Griffiths

    For relativity:
    1. Gravitation - Charles Misner and John Wheeler
    2. Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation - Alan Lightman and Richard Price.

    (Read 1 and do 2 thoroughly and you can become an authority on relativity.)

  213. Schrodingers cat by kevco46 · · Score: 1

    Try "In Search of Schrodinger's Cat". It gives a history of the growth of quantum mechanics as a science. It involves very little math and is intersting at times. It is a good start before you consider anything mathematical regarding quantum mechanics. I used it for my introductory quantum physics course and it helps to explain the difficult concepts in quantum mechanics.

    1. Re:Schrodingers cat by xpb2 · · Score: 1

      If you really want layman terms don't go with Schrodingers cat, yet. It can be difficult to grasp at some times even though I enjoyed reading it I would not suggest starting out with it for awhile.

  214. Price (new) $142.95 by Racer+X · · Score: 1

    just fyi, the new edition is $142.95 on amazon.

  215. First of all, by Enonu · · Score: 1

    "a lot" is two words! When people read what you write, and notice such atrocities, it completely distracts them from the topic at hand! Stop doing it!

    Second of all, learn to find information for yourself! Physics is such an open and popular field that you can find a ton of book reviews online. Also, use Google for Christ's sakes for those PDFs you mentioned.

    Then again, you might have already thought about the above, and came to the conclude on:

    Why do it yourself when you can "Ask Slashdot" to do it for you?

  216. "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Dragonshed · · Score: 1

    The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics
    By, Gary Zukav

    Mass Market Paperback: 337 pages ; Dimensions (in inches): 1.05 x 6.88 x 4.20
    Publisher: Bantam Books; ISBN: 055326382X; Reissue edition (September 1994)

    I'm quite surprized noone has posted this book yet. Very accessable, well written, and full of interesting anecdotes and some humor. It may be dated, given that it was published in 94, but alot of the work towards the Grand Unified Theory of Physics has been going on alot longer than 8 years :)

    1. Re:"The Dancing Wu Li Masters" by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

      It was published in the late 70's d00d. It's in my bathroom right now ;)

  217. I recoomend this: by scosol · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0964 350416/qid=1031612316/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_2/002-205001 3-9568050?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

    It's a Japanese textbook translated in to English-
    As such- you get a bunch of goofy Japanese cartoons in there too :)

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
  218. Cartoon Physics! by CaptMathtastic · · Score: 1

    Larry Gonick's "Cartoon Guide to Physics" is fun and entertaining.

    --
    I think that I think, therefore I think that I am. I think. . .
  219. A few texts I recommend by plastik55 · · Score: 2
    First stop: Many colleges are publishing homework and lecture notes online nowadays. Leech off of those. You will still need some textbooks though.


    I'm going to assume you want to learn some physics, as opposed to learning about physics. If this is the case, you can ignore stuff like "Black Holes and Time Warps" and "A Brief History of Time" -- they're good bathroom reading material but won't actually get you anywhere in your understanding.


    Next I'm going to assume you have had enough calculus to be able to differentiate any function and integrate some of them. If not, well, you need to learn some calculus first off (You might be able to do this concurrent with reading Serway; it could help solidify the concepts.)


    For introductory fare, try Serway's Physics for Scientists and Engineers. Don't let the title put you off--there's an unspoken law of textbook publishing where you have to inflate the titles of easy books and deflate the title of hard books. A book subtitled "For Scientists and Engineers" will usually be easier than one with "Elementary" or "Basic" prepended to its title. Serway has good exercises (for any book you use, do the problems or you won't learn anything! You don't have to do all of them, but enough so that you can look at the ones you haven't done and see what a good approach should be.)


    Serway will cover mechanics pretty well. Passing out of Newtonian mechanics and getting into real physics now, there are several areas of physics which the typical undergraduate science education touches on. These are, approximately, Electricity and Magnetism, Special Relativity, Wave Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, and Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics. In order:

    • E&M -- Purcell's book "Electricity & Magnetism" is easily the bast text I had out of my entire college career (and this comes from a non-physics major). It is heavy on visual thinking and introduces you to new mathamatical tools (e.g. vector calculus) when you need them. It also has bits on special relativity (the unification of SR and E&M is the most beautiful piece of physics that most people will ever be able to understand.)
    • Special Relativity -- I like Einstein's "Relativity: The Special and General Theories." No exercises though--when I was in school, we used Wheeler's "Spacetime Physics" which is just plain incoherent.
    • Wave Mechanics -- This is what you need to know to be able to parse the occasional /. stories about physicists stopping light and/or making materials with negative refractivity. Crawford's "Waves" is probably my second favorite text of all time. Unfortunately, I hear it's out of print. Try to find a used copy. It (along with Purcell's E&M) is part of the "Berkeley physics course" series, and shares some strong points with Purcell--timely introduction to mathmatical techniques (you need a bit of differential equations and Fourier transforms this time) and a relatively relaxed exposition.
    • Quantum Mechanics and Statistical Mechanics/Thermodynamics -- Unfortunately I can't really recommend the books I've used for these subjects. You may want to look at the other volumes in the Berkeley series, since I've had good luck with Purcell and Crawford's books. Christoph Adami's "Introduction to Artificial Life" solidified the concepts of entropy and heat for me much better than any of the pure stat. mech. texts I had, so I recommend it as a supplement (and a fascinating subject in itself.)

    Anyway, that should keep you busy for a while ;)
    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  220. where's your licence? by danny · · Score: 2
    No one should be allowed to interact with matter - let alone study physics! - until they have the necessary mathematics background to understand what they are doing. Otherwise they could screw up all kinds of things. (We don't let people drive cars without a licence, why would we let them loose on the universe without proper training?)

    So you should spent fifty years studying mathematics first, in order to attain a sufficient level of enlightenment to safely bind yourself to the Wheel.

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  221. Best texts, chosen according to math level by MBoss · · Score: 1
    I agree that the Halliday, Resnick, and Krane Fundamentals of Physics texts are good, but only for those with adequate background in mathematics.

    If you can do basic calculus (differentiate and integrate), you will be able to handle the Mechanics text by HRK. You should also be able to understand the Electricity and Magnetism volume also.

    If you want to delve further, the best quantum mechanics and E&M texts (IMHO) are by Professor David Griffiths of Reed College, Oregon. He knows how to present the material in an easy and straightforward manner. Unfortunately, to delve this deep you will need to understand differential equations- there is simply no way around this. Quantum mechanics really requires understanding basic linear algebra also- fortunately, Prof. Griffiths gives the basics of LA we need to know to understand QM in his text.

    If you want to understand where all the equations in HRK come from, you could check out the Marion Classical Mechanics text, which is more formal (ie mathy). There are several other texts that are equally as good, but this is the one I used.

    Thermodynamics comes in 2 flavors. Thermo for physicists, and thermo for everybody else- engineers, chemists, biologists, doctors, etc. The physics version has roots in both classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. In my opinion, there are NO good thermodynamics texts out there. In the end, thermo is nothing more than some dressed up statistical analysis, with a smattering of diff. eq. thrown in for good measure. Seems simple, in reality it is not, and is very difficult to grasp due to the combinatorics. Standard text undergrad text is the Kittel and Kroemer book, Thermal Physics . It helps to know a lot of little math tricks to understand thermo, and also when to properly apply approximations.

    That being said, what about people who got up to algebra, and maybe trig, but not calculus? Well, these texts are not for you. I think the best texts in this genre are not the high school texts, but the college texts written for students not taking other related courses, such as calculus, etc. An example would be Conceptual Physics by Paul Hewitt . This book can be bought with a workbook, in the back of which are all the answers with explanations. This type of book is good because the math is kept to a minimum (mostly). Even so, you can still use basic arithmetic to explore various physics concepts, and then check your answers in the back of the book.

    As far as the Hawking books go, I find it difficult to believe that laypeople actually understand where he is coming from. It is pretty heady stuff, and I know I didn't understand it the first time I read it (before I started taking physics courses). These books by "star" authors like Hawking tend to be very specialized books that concern themselves only with the subfield of the author- in this case, black holes and quantum gravity. If you want to understand how basic things work (like why we hit a terminal velocity, or how come things fly off a spinning disk, how does electricty work, etc), these types of books are not the ones you should investigate. I'd say that Hewitt book is much better suited- it goes over basic mechanics, basic electrostatics and magnetism, thermodynamics in the form of phase changes and entropy, and a dash of quantum mechanics and nuclear physics. And it does all of this with a 1000x more pictures (not just diagrams!) than a Hawking book will.

    Any comments on my choice of books?

  222. Cartoon Guide to Physics by surfcow · · Score: 1

    Sounds improbable, but it is a good intro to general physics. The author / illustrator does a great job. I can't say enough about this book.

    Find it at amazon:
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/00 62 731009/qid=1031613465/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/103-635038 8-1471003

    =brian

  223. Feynman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you're posting here I'll assume you have a reasonable degree of intelligence and want to learn physics to a decent level, and have some initiative. (Okay, maybe that's a rather sweeping assumption but what the hey...)

    Go to your local bookstore. Get Feynman's "Lectures on Physics". Start at the beginning and read it through slowly, bit by bit, until you understand it. When you can really say to yourself that you understand Volume 1, you've got a good background. When you can say the same of Volume 2, you've got a more solid background than many Physics graduates, and when you can say the same of Volume 3, you have as good a basis for understanding physical problems as pretty much anyone (though you might need to do some further reading if you want to specialise more).

    The above should take 2 years full-time if you're smart, if you do it properly and don't just skip the bits of maths you don't understand, and if you do enough problems to know that you really do understand it. (Make them up and get someone to check them or do problems from a few second-hand undergraduate physics primers.)

    Feynman is great; the diagrams are a bit old-style but everything is solid and everything is as solidly built from first principles as any course I have come across. Although it isn't by any means complete, if you can understand everything in the books properly then you'll be able to get to grips with what it doesn't cover quickly and efficiently.

  224. Let's See... by BlackGriffen · · Score: 2

    As previously mentioned, Feynman's Lectures are great. I would also recommend The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. The stuff about string theory is stuff you can ignore, but the sections on relativity and QM are pretty good "in a nutshell" type explanations.

    BlackGriffen

  225. dont laugh by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's actually got a lot of very good material.

    I used it to revise for my semiconductor electronics course and was surprised by the quality or the text (and the decoration).

  226. '...For Beginners' comic books. by cuberat · · Score: 1
    Seriously. These are small books, written in whimsical style with lots of graphics, but scientifically accurate and a great place to start. I majored in physics and still own two copies of "Einstein for Beginners" by Schwartz and McGuinness because it's a riot.

    I also own "Darwin for Beginners" by Miller and Van Loon, and it's an excellent distillation of a very complicated subject.

    Plus - and this is importent - they are really fun to read.

    --

    I'll tell you what the 'effect' is! It's pissing me off!

  227. POQM by PAM Dirac unbeatable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's old, and you may not have the background, but if you have the background to understand it then Principles of Quantom Mechanichs by P. A. M. Dirac is still an excellent introduction to Quantum Mechanics.

    Other posters have mentioned the Feynman lectures. Those are more generic, but if you want an introduction to all of Physics they're hard to beat. Your best bet is to buy both, including the video.

  228. physics site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    take a look at www.fearofphysics.com--even explains some simple quantum mechanics!

  229. Books on tape at yer local public library by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    My wife's family is a six-hour car trip away, and my wife and I have taken to books on tape to make it more endurable. We recently listened to "Six Easy Pieces", a collection of lectures by Richard Feynman when he taught the intro physics class at Cal Tech for one year only (I think it was 1961). They're a great summary by a great mind if you've had physics, and a great intro if you haven't.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  230. The Physics of Baseball by plagioclase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Physics of Baseball
    by Robert K Adair, Ph.D.

    This book may not be exactly what your looking for, but it does put across some of the fundamental principles of real world physics in an easy to read format. One nice thing is that the equations are explained, but completely skippable. There's also a lot of interesting history pertaining to each topic.

    I personally enjoyed reading it, even though I'm not a baseball fan.

    --
    Yeah, I have a webcomic...
  231. Some suggestions from a Fizzicks grad student by mrflip · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am an nth year grad student at UTexas-Austin. Here are my suggestions:

    QED by Richard Feynman

    QED stands for Quantum Electrodynamics -- the modern theory of how light travels and interacts with matter. It also stands for Quod Erat Demonstratum -- the phrase mathematicians use to show the successful completion of a proof. QED (the theory) is one of the most beautiful and precisely verified theories in all of science; the author is not only one of the principal architects of that theory but its clearest expositor. Feynman carefully paints a clear, physical picture of a mindblowing esoteric landscape populated by particles that spring into existence or annihilate into photons, taking all possible paths in order to find the 'natural' one. This is the best science book for a general audience I have read.

    Any educated person with an appreciation and interest for science should enjoy this book.

    The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. 1
    by R.P. Feynman and R. Leighton

    For the more serious and technical reader, the first volume of the Feynman Lectures serve as an excellent self-study textbook. Reading these books made me change my major to physics. I referred to them consistently well into my graduate studies, since they do the best job of describing a tangible, physical model of what is happening. For example, the chapter on conservation of energy does the best job I have seen of not only describing the principle but explaining the importance and relevance of conservation principles. Six chapters of this book are sold as 'Six Easy Pieces' -- but anyone geeky enough for Slashdot should spring for the real thing.

    Any person with a technical background and college mathematics will enjoy and refer to this book -- especially as a supplement to lesser textbooks.

    Nobel Lectures in Physics 1901-1921, pub. Elsevier 1967
    Nobel Lectures in Physics 1922-1941, pub. Elsevier 1967
    (possibly out of print; try BookFinder or similar)

    Each Nobel Laureate gives a talk that is supposed to describe the science behind the prize at a general level. Most of them succeed in doing quite a good job. The science from these first four decades of modern physics is well described elsewhere, but these lectures give you a first-hand account that complements the textbook approach, and can be quite enlightening scientifically as well as giving a history, social, and scientific context.

    All the heavy hitters are here:

    Laureates in vol. 1 include Roentgen, for X-rays; Becquerel and the Curies, for discovering radioactivity; JJ Thomson, for discovery of the electron; Michelson (of the Michelson-Morley experiment and the precision measurement of the speed of light); Laue, and later the Braggs, for X-Ray diffraction; Max Planck, for the quantum hypothesis; and some dude named Albert Einstein (who won for his theory of the photoelectric effect but gave his lecture on relativity, which was understood to be more important but was still speculative at the time).

    Laureates in vol. 2 include Bohr, for the structure of the atom; Millikan, for determining Planck's constant; Franck and Hertz, for verifiying Bohr's quantum model of the atom; DeBroglie, for matter waves; Heisenberg, Schroedinger, and Dirac, for quantum mechanics; Davisson and Thomson, for demonstrating that electrons are waves as well as particles; and Fermi, for artificial radioactivity.

    Any person who wants a first-hand account of the story and the science behind the great developments in physics will enjoy these books.

    The Flying Circus of Physics by J Diamond

    This book simply contains a series of single paragraphs, each of which describes an ordinary or extraordinary physical phenomenon followed by a series of general questions on that topic. (For example: Why are sunsets usually more colorful than sunrises?) Some conundra would make good science fair project for a middle-to-high school student, or amateur hobbyist; most can provide a group of geeks with solid dinner-conversation material as they puzzle out the answer. Even a physics professor will have to think carefully before answering each question, but they all depend on basic physics -- an elementary physics student with motivation has the tools to answer any given question. The back of the book contains a brief answer to each question and pointers to journals or books giving more information. However, the real value of the book is to make you sweat out the physics and sharpen your intuition, so looking at the answers is cheating (early versions of the book had none).

    Physics majors or students taking college physics classes who want to plumb the depths of their understanding or find jumping-off points for independent study should get this book.

  232. Problem with pop science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It does a good job of telling you about some of the more cutting-edge research areas in physics. Unfortunately most pop science reads something like Star Trek: Voyager. It introduces a lot of fancy words and tries to describe the mathematical models behind them in easy, pictorial terms. Unfortunately this doesn't tell you much more than looking at the images on nasa.gov. Use this as the acid test for anything that purports to teach you about science (or anything else for that matter): could I, having read this, do even the simplest calculation in the field? Or even say how I would go about doing the calculation?

    If you can't do that, all you have is a pretty picture.

    There's no point trying to claim you can understand physics if all you've read is "A Brief History of Time". You'll have a lovely mental image, but unless you can say something interesting based on what you've read then you don't understand it. (It doesn't have to be something new, just a deduction based on what you've read so far.)

    If this sounds elitist, well sorry but it is. You wouldn't expect to walk up to the track alongside Maurice Greene and Dwaine Chambers and run a competitive 100m; likewise, don't expect to pick up a pop-science book and understand modern physics. You'll do much, much better starting at the beginning and getting a really solid grasp of calculus and 19th-century physics, then moving on through special relativity and basic quantum physics, and solid-state physics, and then, once you've got a really solid understanding of that, moving on to try to think about stuff like general relativity or advanced quantum physics. With those two subjects in particular, if you don't have an extremely solid grounding in the relevant maths as well as the older physics on which they are based, then you will come well and truly unstuck and may as well just have read "A bluffer's guide to quantum physics".

  233. The Physics of Christmas by _aa_ · · Score: 2

    The Physics of Christmas by Roger Highfield. It takes a whimsical, and Yule-tied view at several historical and physical characteristics of every Christian's favorite holiday, such as the aerodynamics of reindeer, and the thermaldynamics of turkey.

    Although, i did find that it addressed the history and psychology behind Christmas, as much as it did the physics. Still I think it'd be a great "Gateway" book for novices and younguns.

  234. re Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to know about Chaos (which isn't strictly physics but is a very useful mathematical tool for when you get good at physics, and for producing motivational pictures while you get good at physics) then I'd agree about Gleick's book, but add recommendations for the original and best - Mandelbrot's "The Fractal Geometry of Nature" - also a rather out-of-date book called "Fractal Programming in C" which might be a useful introduction for the CSers among you. Two other books I can't pass over are Lorenz's "The essence of Chaos" and Jackson's "Perspectives of non-linear dynamics" (2 vols.), though the last is pretty heavy on the maths.

  235. The Tao of Physics - Fritjof Capra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Tao of Physics
    An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism
    Fourth Edition, Updated

    By Fritjof Capra

  236. another vote for halliday and resnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you've got the math, the H&R undergraduate introductory physics text "Fundementals of Physics" is very good. there is a supplement: "Basic Concepts in Relativity and Early Quantum Theory, 2/E" which is quite good, very accessible, pitched at college sophmore level (in the US scheme).

    there are lots of sophmore level "Modern Physics" texts -- I like Ohanian as a teaching text. Tipler is also good. If your math is up to it, there is Resnick and Eisberg "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles". This was my undergrad modern physics text. didn't suck. i still use it as reference.

    i've tried to use the Feynman lectures to teach undergrad physics. unfortunately, i am not Feynman. they are very nice to have on your shelf (they are impressively large and -- in the anniversary edition -- very handsome). reading them can be inspiring, but i have not found them to be particularly useful either as teaching texts or as reference.

    to assess the level of your ignorance, i highly recommend Hammermesh & Bayman "Review of Undergraduate Physics" -- a title designed to depress graduate students using the text to prepare for their qualifying exams. it is an excellent tool for identifying deficiencies in your understanding of the big 4 (mechanics, e&m, thermo/stat mech, and quantum).

  237. "Thinking Physics" by klui · · Score: 1

    When I went to junior college I took Conceptual Physics in which my instructor used his book "Thinking Physics." His style made the class much more interesting. There's almost no calculations involved. Some samples from the book can be found at this web site.

  238. Physics overview by jvollmer · · Score: 1

    Nothing beats "The Dancing Wu Li Masters."
    Bantam Books
    ISBN:055326382X; Reissue edition (September 1994)

  239. i don't know if this helps or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PROBLEM SETS!!!

    It's a bit of a joke, but actually not at all...I took my first physics class as a 2nd semester Junior in college. I did pretty well in the course (B+), tough prof. I even did poorly (C) in calculus....I attribute my success in physics to the textbooks that we used.

    Six Ideas that Shaped Physics. I just tried to find it on Amazon and it was NOT THERE.

    See if you can get any other good physics textbook. That advise sucks, I know.

  240. books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a couple of books that i have used in my undergraduate courses are...
    Quantum: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths.
    Astrophysics: An Introduction to Modern Stellar Astrophysics by Ostlie.
    Thermo/stat mech: a good intro book is Heat and Thermodynamics by Zemansky and Dittman.
    Classical mechanics: Classical Dynamics of Systems and Particles by Marion and Thornton.
    All books require a working knowlede of claculus and all supply the math techniques that are needed for the book. The only math intensive book is the Classical Dynamics of Systems and particles which uses calculus of variations in the latter portion of the book.

  241. "damn it" is two words, too! (how many is "oops")? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    At least according to www.m-w.com and www.dictionary.com... now if you had just said "dammit!" then I'd be ok with it ;)

  242. Cohen-Tannoudji by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    If your serious, Cohen-Tannoudji is the standard undergraduate text.

    Amazon

    You read the Feynmen Lectures for pleasure. CT is for doing work. If you want to serviously understand Quantum Field Theories, you'll need CT (or something like it) as a basis.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  243. Light and Matter by Corvus9 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I see several posters suggesting books by Feynman and Hawking. While these are no doubt excellent writers for university undergrads, the article writer specifically asked for "online articles or PDFs" giving "a good, solid foundation".

    If you are looking for an on-line physics course covering the basics, with a free on-line PDF textbook, check out Light and Matter. This course starts out at square 1, describing what science and physics are, moving on to what a "measurement" is, why mathematics are useful for physics, then starts with Newtonian physics, continues through optics and electromagnetism, and to quantum mechanics.

    The site also contains some astronomy texts, physics Java applets. This is an excellent site for anyone teaching physics.

  244. as written by the man himself by wigger · · Score: 1, Interesting

    albert einstein wrote a fantastic book titled "Relativity: The Special and the General Theory" that describes relativity without the heavy math. lots of examples. great stuff. http://www.anybook4less.com/detail/0517884410.html

  245. Don't Know Much About The Universe by lingenfr · · Score: 1

    You might check this one out. There is more info at:

    http://www.dontknowmuch.com/adults/index.asp

    I have not read this particular book, but the other Don't Know Much books are very good.

    I have a book called Einstein for Beginners. It is an illustrated cartoon type book, but I really liked it. It explained relativity and several other concepts in a manner that my 14 can understand. I really liked it alot and I would hope that you also like it a lot.

  246. Paul Tipler - Physics for Scientists and Engineers by pliska · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excellent all-around foundation for someone with a high-school background in math and physics. Covers everything from Thermodynamics to Quantum Mechanics to Astrophysics.

    Not only is this book extraordinarily clear and well written (considering it *is* a physics book), it's loaded with full-colour pictures, real-world examples and illustrations of all the concepts at work.

    I'm guessing this book is used for College courses - there's a ton of problem sets with each chapter, and solutions are provided, as well. From the nature of the content though, it would probably be used for a first-year 'foundation' course, though it does go into some more advanced material: if it's not in this book, you probably wouldn't understand it without reading this book first.

  247. Wonder why no one has mentioned Gamow's Tompkins by Sanga · · Score: 1

    http://btobsearch.barnesandnoble.com/textbooks/boo ksearch/isbninquiry.asp?userid=0EZJTPBVUS&btob=Y&i sbn=0521639921

    A great place to start if the mathematics/calculus of quantum physics too much to handle.

  248. Grammar Counts by windowpain · · Score: 0

    I can teach you two quick things about physics and quantum mechanics.

    You don't capitalize either one in a sentence.

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
  249. Re:U=PHYSICS MASTERBATER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww, never mind AC... *I* can tell it was a joke.

    Stupid fucking moderators... what the hell is wrong with them?

  250. Re:Any of the Feynman Lectures ... will kill you! by Good+Sumerian · · Score: 1

    Just a small pet peeve. It's Caltech. Not CalTech, or CALtech, and certainly not Caltek. And my God it is NOT CalTek. That's the worst perversion of the abbreviation I've seen yet.

    -The Good Sumerian (Hoping to get into Caltech

  251. The Assayer by bcrowell · · Score: 2
    Check out library of congress category QC on The Assayer. The books with a dandelion bud icon next to them are free as in beer, and the ones with the dandelion flowers are free as in speech.

    The Assayer is a site for user-submitted book reviews, with an emphasis on reviews of free books. It turns out to be very difficult to attract reviews, so if you've read any of these, reviews would be much appreciated!

  252. Good by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    I was hoping alot of people would pick up on that.

    Ooops...

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  253. physics for poets by acomj · · Score: 2

    The book is called Physics for poets. Its a good intoduction, yet advanced enough to be used as a university text in a physics for liberal arts majors. Its comparatively inexpensive,

    I like mmy serway college physics text though, its more difficult but has interesting "real world" physics examples.

    1. Re:physics for poets by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do you mean Physics for Poets by March? Yeah, really cool book!!!! March is a simple, understandable book written for beginners . So far, nearly all the posts sound to me like someone asked for the best Linux distro for the absolute beginner, and the suggestions were Debian and Gentoo. C'mon, folks! The original poster asked for introductory books.

      And along the same lines, I can't believe that nobody has suggested Conceptual Physics by Hewitt. I've taught introductory physics at many math levels, and used many books. Hewitt is the only book that I honestly liked teaching out of (well, besides my own books :-).

  254. What about Physics for Game Developers? by PigeonGB · · Score: 1

    While it does include a bit of math it is also good at telling you some basic/advanced topics on physics. Mostly physics as pertaining to bouyancy, forces, acceleration, velocity, etc.

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
  255. Read real physics by Frodo2002 · · Score: 1
    Sorry for trolling slightly, but if you want to learn some basic physics, don't read popular science. I mean "Brief History of Time" and "The First Three Minutes" and "The Dancing Wu Li Masters" and all that sort of thing. I do not believe that they will teach you much physics or give you an idea of what physics is about. My recommendation for a good beginning physics textbook is "Physics for the Inquiring Mind" by Eric M. Rogers. It is out of print (sorry) but if you can find a copy, it would be worth the search. For quantum Mechanics, there is nothing good really. I think Griffiths is ok (David Griffiths that is...). A.S. Davydov is better if you are very brave. Again, it is out of print. :( Also, French and Taylor is pretty good at the "easy" level. As is Eisberg and Resnick although they really do tend to ramble sometimes. One wishes they would just get to the point!

    D

  256. Online links by KingDLROW · · Score: 1
    Feynman is good for clarifying the "harder" math based books, Asimov, imho, should be overlooked- unless you are scared of math. There are many good online books for Physics which I have not seen any links posted.

    Here is a 700+ page book similar in content to a freshman college text MotionMountain

    This is a Classical Electrodynamic book at a graduate level Classical Electrodynamics-Bo Thide

    A site for Statistical and Thermal Physics with some good notes by Harvey Gould Statistical and Thermal Physics (STP) Curriculum Development Project

    Quantum Mechanics--Niels Walet-- see the "Big .ps file

    Lecture Notes on General Relativity-- Sean M. Carroll

    A list of books to look into Cease's Book List

    A few authors I like are A.P. French, Halliday Resnick for intro, Griffiths

    A very respectable Oxford Physics booklist can be found in their handbook here

  257. Physics2000 on CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    A fascinating intro to Physics. Written for a first college-level course.
    • Starts with Relativity, then covers the simpler special cases
    • Fluid dynamics, electric fields, Maxwell's equations
    • First semester of Calculus covered in an Appendix
    • Movies of the best parts
    • On a single CD
    • All for $10

    It's at http://physics2000.com/
  258. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. by sbaker · · Score: 2


    The Feynman Lectures on Physics - three large red-covered
    paperbacks - cost about $150 new - but can be found cheap
    in 2nd hand bookstores near any University campus!

    For less intense reading - alternate chapters from these books
    with chapters from the many biographies of Feynman.

    Feynman was an awesome physicist and a great educator - but
    in his spare time he was...well - just read the biographies!

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  259. Book(s) to try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this one: 'Physics for the Rest of Us' by Roger S. Jones ISBN: 0-8092-3716-4

    And this one is really good, too: 'Coming of Age in the Milky Way' by Timothy Ferris ISBN: 0-385-26326-0

    The first book is an excellent one for non-physics class taking people like me, and the second one is excellent for anyone that likes physics, astronomy, and philosophy. Both really excellent books, that should do a good job of putting your brain to work.

  260. Quantum Mechanics by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

    For a very basic introduction to the ideas and thinkers behind quantum mechanics, check out this url: http://www.symonds.net/~deep/stuff/qp/index.php. You may find it helpful.

  261. Best Physics Textbooks for Basic Concepts by kalamazoo904 · · Score: 1

    If all you want is a conceptual, "in-your-head", reasonably math-free treatment of physics, your best pick absolutely has to be Hewitt's _Conceptual Physics_. This guy writes in an easy-to-understand style and uses plenty of graphics and self-drawn cartoons to demonstrate and illustrate. If you "just don't get it" and the math only mucks up your thinking, go for this one.

    A good standard AP high school/basic college text would be Serway or Giancoli. (Hint: Serway's cheaper. =-)

    The top-of-the-line in easily accessible physics textbooks is definitely the Feynman Lectures on Physics. You'll only get as far as QED (since they were written in the late 50's), but for most people, quantum electrodynamics is as far as they *want* to go. Ol' Dick Feynman will give you the full math treatment, but explains it so clearly and concisely it'll go down like fresh-churned buttermilk. I swear by the Red Books, and I know many a colleague who wouldn't be caught stranded on a desert island without 'em.

    --
    Your friendly neighborhood nitpicker
  262. a nice serious book on quantum mechanics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David Griffiths. I've heard good things about it, and having used his electromagnetism book as an undergraduate I can really recommend his style.

  263. Physics for Poets by speleo · · Score: 1

    "Physics for Poets" by Robert H. March.

    This is a excellent introduction to physics and is more approachable for some than either Feynman or Hawking.

  264. K5 by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Now that you've seen Slashdot Science, wander over to K5 and look at the Physics summaries which are being posted there.

  265. Another 2 cents... by bargonzo · · Score: 1

    I've always liked Tipler.

  266. Feynman is always refreshing by p3tersen · · Score: 1

    I often reread Feynman's autobiographical stuff for inspiration when an experiment is driving me nuts. For an illuminating look at the foundations of physics I'd recommend his _The Character of Physical Law_ (my favorite bit is where he says that although we used to think that the planets were held in place by angels pushing them out away from the sun, nowadays we know better - the angels, in fact, push _in_).

    I'd recommend AVOIDING gee-whiz quantum mechanics pop science books. Sorry to all the Gribbin fans out there, but it took me the first 3 years of my degree to finally shake off some rather unhelpful ideas I'd gotten from "Schroedinger's kittens".

    If you want to learn "serious" physics, especially quantum mechanics, in a meaningful way, there will be some maths involed. Serway and especially Tipler seem so make this less unpleasant than most. If you have a semi-solid maths background already, the first few chapters of _Quantum Mechanics_ by Townsend will show you how quantum mechanics actually WORKS, without any wavefunction messiness, and without any hocus-pocus. It does require basic vector calculus and linear algebra to about first-year university level, but such is the nature of the subject.

  267. Qualitative Fun by jmiles · · Score: 1
    Much of what is recommended above, while good sources for the formalism of physics, are going to be too dense for someone who might like to just get a cool overview of the fundamental weirdness of physics.

    These two are easily enjoyed with minimal formal physics education:

    Kip Thorne, "Black Holes and Time Warps" -- painfully cheesey name, but an excellent introduction to Einstein's relativity (special and general), the historical development of astrophysics leading to currently expected black hole phenomena, and possibilities for worm holes and other trekky stuff. Includes helpful sketches. I'm told Thorne is an awful lecturer (he's a Caltech theorist now), but he writes a good book.

    John R. Gribbin, "In Search of Schrodinger's Cat" -- Lots of cool qualitative quantum physics, minus the linear algebra. Extrapolates the favored "Copenhagen interpretation" to apply to the macroscopic "real" world. The particle physics at the end is slightly out-dated, as this was published in the early '80's, but the fundamental ideas haven't changed.

    Thought I'd throw some alternatives out there.

    --
    Anecdotal evidence! I'm sold!
  268. Feynman said... by cyril3 · · Score: 1
    in an interview when asked for a brief introduction to QCD for the listner's who might not be up to speed

    "If I could do that I wouldn't have gotten a Nobel Prize for it"

    Don't know if its true or apocryphal but it fits.

  269. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by David J. Grif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was my Quantum Mechanics (Pronounced: Condom Mechanics) 2 book.

    It is super amazing, its easy to learn. it is to the point with no bull shit, and its funny.

    for basic first year bullshit : get the latest copy of serway.

    ps. physics is Quite Broad
    Thermal, Quantum, Optical, Astophysics, Clasical, EM, Partical.....you might want to narow it down...
    or plan on spending 4+ years learning.

  270. a few suggestions by hawkedwards · · Score: 1

    It depends what you're looking for, but here's a list with comments. Many of these are mentioned above, but I always take multiple recommendations
    as a useful sign.

    For non-scientists wanting an understanding of things, not to solve equations:
    1. Thinking Physics; Epstein. This is a little question/answer book that I picked up years ago. It's all about understanding concepts without solving equations, and I think it's very good for what the poster asked for. It's probably hard to find, though.

    2. The Cosmic Code; Pagels. Also, In Search of Schrodinger's Cat; Gribbon.
    I read both of these ~ 15 years ago and liked them very much. I think that quantum mechanics is one of the more interesting areas of physics to read about. This is because the concepts are so interesting on their own, without working through equations. You really don't want to slog through a text on classical mechanics, on the other hand.

    3. QED; Feynman. Already mentioned by several people. My only caveat is that I'm not sure that someone who hasn't read/thought about quantum mechanics a bit will get so much out of it. I read it after taking a semester of quantum mechanics and I was fascinated; it remains one of my favorite books.

    4. "The Flying Circus of Physics"; Walker. A list of questions that anyone might have about how the world works (of the "why is the sky blue" sort, but on many topics) with short answers and references.
    Fun to have around.

    Other:

    The Astronomy Cafe; Odenwald and Just Visiting This Plant; Tyson. Both on astronomy/cosmology, and I found both to be enjoyable reads.

    Boojums All the Way Through; Mermin. A collection of writings, and a few will likely not interest a non-physicist. However, Mermin has thought a lot about the whole "understanding quantum mechanics"/EPR paradox/quantum measurment thing and a whole section of this book is on that topic. Also, he has a couple of cute articles on math topics that should interest anyone who enjoys that sort of thing.

    Finally, I didn't really enjoy "Brief History of Time" very much. It's been a while, so I don't have a great reason why, but basically I didn't feel like I got that much out of it.

  271. Classic: The ABC of Relativity by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 1

    Sir Herman Bondi derives relativity using
    simple geometry, good stuff. There was an updated version of this with a sligthly different title, check under Bondi at your favorite online bookseller.

    --
    It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
  272. "ware" is a word too... by CreamsicleSeventeen · · Score: 1

    but what it means to me is different from what it means to you.

  273. i wouldn't trust the word of a poster... by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
    ...who doesn't know the difference between "its" and "it's":

    Why? Because it has become one word through it's use by many people as one word.

    "It's" means "it is". "Its" (no apostrophe) is the possessive form of "it", just like "theirs" is the possessive form of "their".

    Anyway, "alot" as a single word may be common, but it is not common in the usage of educated writers, and any dictionary or stylebook that you pick up will advise against it. While the English language certainly evolves over time, your writing will likely be judged by the prevailing standards of the day.

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  274. Excellent reading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly recommend _The Elegant Universe_ by Brian Green and _The Tao of Physics_ by Fritjof Capra

  275. Landau-Lifshitz by Compuser · · Score: 2

    Their series are still the best. A bit on the
    advanced side but self-contained and very
    logical.

    1. Re:Landau-Lifshitz by andrew+cooke · · Score: 2

      "a bit on the advanced side" is an understatement when you're posting in a thread that contains posts about books that "you can get by without calculus"...

      if anyone is thinking of buying a l&l text: they're great classics of physics but, while the level does vary from book to book, they all tend to assume that you have a decent mathematical background. they're also fairly old, so you might have to look elsewhere for recent developments.

      i suspect most /. readers would be better off with either feynamn's popular books or his lectures (already mentioned a thousand times above).

      --
      http://www.acooke.org
  276. List of online physics books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/s ubjectstart?QC

  277. physics by baomike · · Score: 1

    I would also suggest looking at the Univ of Washinton's "video on demand" site.
    http://www.washington.edu/uwtv/ondemand/ind ex.html
    We are lucky enough to have the channel live on DISH NETWORK and I watch some of the programs . If you are interested in the subject they can be quite good.
    The ones on the BIG BANG and astronomy are quite interesting. Some explanation of "string theory etc"

    Also look at the med stuff (UW has a med school) some sports medicine , some is fairly technical.
    This is basicly info from the guys who are doing it.

    mike

  278. Mod Parent Up & Other John Gribbin Goodies... by /Idiot\ · · Score: 1

    ...Gribbin rocks, don't believe me? He wrote a book for the Get A Grip... series, his was Get A Grip On New Science.

    I have read a good number of the books listed above but this one made a bigger impression on me that Breif History...!

    Paperback, ISBN: 0297827030
    Publisher: Weidenfeld & Nicolson (London), 1999
    Out of print but B&N have many copies listed as 2nd hand.

    --
    /dev/Idiot/
  279. Feynman Lectures on Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (2 volumes) is highly regarded.

  280. a free (beer) source by agurkan · · Score: 1

    I hope this is not repeat:

    http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/

    It is not a book you can read but a very good reference to look up formulae etc.

    For physical insight, the standard reference would be "Feynman lectures on physics". You cannot beat that. For fun stuff "Mr. Tompkins in paperback", try to find the original edition though. It won't make you think tigers are worthless, don't worry.

    --
    ato
  281. From the geek library. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    Try George Gamow's One Two Three... Infinity ISBN 0-486-25664-2. Good general purpose science book though being first published in 1948 some topics have been proven wrong.

  282. Simple Intro to Physics by telegramsam70 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone looked at Larry Gonick's Cartoon Guild to Physics? Great stuuf, and in the same flavor as his famous Cartoon history of the universe here's a link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0062731009/ ref=pd_sxp_elt_l1/102-3203929-9127341

  283. QM Books by Matthew+Austern · · Score: 1

    I've never seen a good QM book that's completely nonmathematical; my impression is that there aren't any. I think you'll have to read something with equations, which means some calculus and linear algebra.

    The two books that seem to be used most often as undergrad texts are Liboff and Gasiorowicz. Both are pretty good; I've used both. I like Gasiorowicz a bit better, but tastes probably differ.

    If you've got a strong mathematical background, the most elegant summary of quantum mechanics I've seen is the first few chapters of Dirac's Principle of Quantum Mechanics.

  284. Good Quantum Mech Books by delirium7777 · · Score: 1

    I've only been into Q-mechanics for a few years now, but I'd have to say the most useful book you could ever own on Q-mechanics is "Q is for Quantum". It's an encyclopedia based guide to all you would need to know and a bit more. Published by The Free Press. Author: John Gribbin. Copyright: 1998.

    --
    Seek not such worldy things. Instead, present yourself to the gods in perfect simplicity. -Marcus Aurelius
  285. Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by Louis+Savain · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    two additional chapters, including indepth discussions regarding the possibilities of time travel.

    Hawking is a perfect example of a crackpot and/or charlatan who has managed to get his crackpot ideas accepted by a generation raised on Star-Trek physics and cheap sci-fi novels. Any physicist of reknown who gets away with talking about time travel as if it were a valid scientific pursuit, makes it on my list of notorious time travel crackpots. Any physicist of reknown who teaches that anything can move in spacetime (or that "time dilation" is a form of time travel, or that we are moving in time toward the future at the rate of one second per second) deserves to be tarred and feathered and paraded through the streets as an example to the others. Damn it! This hogwash has been around for way too long. One hundred years of this crap is about enough, in my opinion. For more information on why time does not pass and why time travel is the ultimate crackpot idea, check out the page below.

    Nasty Little Truth About Spacetime Physics

    Truly a marvelous book, easy to understand, yet full of knowledge. I recommend it to almost anyone I meet.

    I do too, especially if you're a Star-Trek fanatic wearing your little Ferengi outfit. Still, I've got a little gift for you. Hopefully it will wake you out of your stupor: Spacetime is changeless from the infinite past to the infinite future. Chew on that for a while.

    1. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

      Spacetimeis changeless from the infinite past to the infinite future. Chew on that for a while.

      Two words: Prove it.

    2. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

      Prove it.

      There is nothing to prove. The changelessness of spacetime is a natural consequence of the definition of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is changeless by definition!!

      This is what makes the whole time travel and spacetime crackpottery even more mind-boggling. This stuff is being preached to the faithful by some of the most famous and admired scientists on the earth! The cream of the crop!

      It's been close to a hundred years since the idea of a physical time dimension was introduced. Why is it that physicists continue to preach their time travel crap in this day and age? Do I hear money? Do I hear political correctness? Do I hear crackpottery? You bet I do.

    3. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by guybarr · · Score: 2

      There is nothing to prove. The changelessness of spacetime is a natural consequence of the definition of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is changeless by definition!!

      You've just stated an axiom of a model. This does not mean your model fits reality, or quantify how well it does so.

      In fact, it is a well tested (though not so well understood) axiom of QM is that the process of measurement in QM abruptly changes the state of the meausred system.

      IANA high-energy physicist, but IMHO this strongly implies (though by no means proves) that a theory combining QM and gravity should incorporate some kind of basic description of the geometry of the universe more general than 3+1 Riemannian manifold (+QFT fields defined on them). Since some mechanism of assigning probabilities to space-time configurations may be needed.

      And if all this did not convince you that changelessness of space-time is by no means trivial, just think about the following question: how do you incorporate a feynmann-path-integral quantum approach (system moves through ALL possible paths) to gravity with an image of static, changeless space-time ?

      It's been close to a hundred years since the idea of a physical time dimension was introduced. Why is it that physicists continue to preach their time travel crap in this day and age? Do I hear money? Do I hear political correctness? Do I hear crackpottery? You bet I do.

      I feel really small when trying to discuss such intelectual behemuths, but let me humbly suggest a different interpretation:
      It's not PC, It's not money, It's not even pursuit of glory, It's just that we don't know. These smart people try very hard, and very skillfully, but they know our two most basic models of the world are still inconsistent, and this does leave open the possibilities of very weird phenomena. It is part of their jobs to point them out.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    4. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That 'charlatan' is Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge, Fellow of The Royal Society and a Member of the US National Academy of Sciences. Would you care to share with us just what makes you qualified to judge such a man ?

    5. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      Your concept of "physical time dimension" is incomplete.

      What you miss in all your discussion of "ct is in units of meters" is that the spacetime metric, which is what actually determines distance between points in spacetime, assigns an opposite sign to the square of the "ct" component.

      If you like, you can keep a Euclidean-looking metric by making the time coordinate imaginary:
      (ict)^2 = -c^2 t^2.

      In either case, the time direction is distinct from the ordinary physical dimensions.

      Psychologically, this seems to result in our experiencing that some events occur "earlier" than other "later" events, in a very different way than we see things happen to the "left" of things that are to the "right." Basically, watches and meter sticks seem to be very different kinds of instruments. The speed of light allows us to relate the two types of measurement to each other, but there is just something very different about what they do.

    6. Re:Hawking Is a Notorious Time Travel Crackpot by Louis+Savain · · Score: 2

      That 'charlatan' is Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge, Fellow of The Royal Society and a Member of the US National Academy of Sciences.

      That's precisely why he is such a charlatan. He should know better.

      Would you care to share with us just what makes you qualified to judge such a man ?

      Spoken like a true Star-Trek fanatic: ignore the message and home in on the messenger. This is a typically lame tactic and it won't work here. My qualifications have nothing to do with it. People are not as stupid as you and those charlatans in Cambridge and elsewhere would like to convince them that they are. We can think for ourselves, thank you very much. A con may last a hundred years, but in the end, truth always catches up with it.

  286. Gary Zukav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav

    Written for the layman in the 70s (I think) by Gary Zukav. An excellent book that anyone can understand (though it does get a little hairy at times, but at least there's no math and equations). Zukav has gotten weird and written some spirituality books (Seat of the Soul) and is a regular guest on Oprah. Kind of a logical progression, I suppose, from physics. But the book is excellent, I highly recommend it.

  287. Quantum mechanics by Rick_T · · Score: 2

    Well, if you're interested in a basic text on quantum mechanics (and its application to chemistry), you might check out Linus Pauling and E. Bright Wilson's _Introduction to Quantum Mechanics_. It's available from Dover Books which means it's about $10. Well worth it especially if you're also interested in how quantum theory came about and some of the older versions of the theory. My local Barnes and Noble had a copy.

    Of course, I'm a chemist, so I'm more focused towards applying things to the real word than most Slashdotters ... ;)

    --
    -- Rick
  288. Erich Greene's "Elegant Universe" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to get a sophisticated layman's intro to modern physics I would recommend Erich Greene's "Elegant Universe" -- it has a lot to offer to layman and physicist alike.

    There are also a _lot_ of online texts available, particularly at the high-school or undergraduate level (its gets a little thinner as you try to specialize).

  289. The Cartoon Guide To Physics by Gonick & Huffm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an excellent beginner's text that is considerably deeper than the title implies. What the "cartoon" part of the title really means is that it is saturated with illustrations. It packs a phenomenal amount of physics into 200 pages. Go leaf through it at the nearest college bookstore and you will want a copy.

  290. books by georg gamow by guest12 · · Score: 1

    i found them a easy read (deceptively easy) and so did my friends i recommended the books...for non mathematical guys. Another book which i remember was by one Bell. (E.T.Bell ? anybody know?) gave a good overall introduction to modern physics. for laymen too.

  291. Two words... by AlphaHelix · · Score: 1

    Landau and Lipschitz. Skip the pop science crap and get a few volumes of L&L. If you can get through them, you'll know more physics than most physics grad students.

    --
    * mild mannered physics grad student by day *
    * daring code hacker by night *
    http://www.silent-tristero.com
  292. Interesting Read by kaptin · · Score: 1

    The Physics of Star Trek by Lawrence M. Krauss (Intro by Stephen Hawking) is a fun/interesting read. It talks about the technologies used in the sci-fi series and movies and how they may or may not actually work (warp drive, "beaming", photon torpedos, impulse engines, ...). The pre-req knowledge isn't that great either and the author fills in the gaps that a newbie to physics might not understand. PS: i'm not a trekkie/er, but it's still a good book.

    --
    If water were beans, I'd be 70% beans.
  293. Good Book by MrMac · · Score: 1

    'Physics For The Rest Of Us' by Roger S. Jones is a excellent book to get a basic grasp of physics. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0809 237164/qid=1031639933/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/103-779415 6-1488666?v=glance&s=books&n=75

    --
    *** I Know Everything, But Can't Remember It All At Once ***
  294. Some belated thoughts - Feynman et al. by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    Halliday and Resnick is an excellent text; I'd get a copy any way I could. An older edition is fine--classical mechanics and E & M haven't changed much.

    I have a soft spot in my heart for David Goodstein's _The Mechanical Universe_, both the text and the TV show, but I don't think that the text is the best out there. I can say from personal experience (Ph 2b at Caltech) that Goodstein is an excellent lecturer; the TV shows are worth watching (N. B. the kids in the audience were all hired from nearby Pasadena City College--real Caltech students are a bunch of lazy, inconsiderate bums.)

    Avoid the Feynman Lectures and "Six Easy Pieces". Everyone I know who bought the books looked at them briefly and then filed them away on the bookshelf never to be touched again. Feynman may have been a legend, and for all I know he was an excellent lecturer, but his Lectures are no substitute for a real physics text.

    Purcell's text is good if you want a standalone E & M text.

    By the way, don't think that you can tackle physics without a good math background. My inability to get much past freshman level math at 'Tech was the main reason why I couldn't handle quantum mechanics when I came to it. Mastering Apostol's _Calculus_ texts, both volumes, would be a good start (but then I would say that, being a former 'Tech student :-b)

    Finally, remember that physics isn't the be-all and end-all that it used to be. There's a reason why the president of Caltech, a school which once taught physics (and a few other sciences on the side), now is a biologist. The hardcore physicist might say that chemistry, astronomy, and biology are all physics in the end, and that's true, but the specialist in quantum electrodynamics never synthesized a drug or created a new disease-resistant strain of wheat.

    Good luck,

    hyacinthus.

  295. Textbooks I've taught from by zunger · · Score: 2

    The original post didn't make it clear which category was asked about: Completely non-technical books, introductory technical books, or books for people with a technical background (engineers or math-oriented geeks of various sorts) who want an introduction to the field?

    Since the first two have already been covered pretty thoroughly, here are a few suggestions for the third, based on classes I've taught (undergrad physics) in the past few years:

    For generic physics, there are standard freshman physics books like Halliday & Resnick or Serway, but these are good mostly if you want to learn basic mechanics of balls rolling down inclined planes and so on. If you're not interested in carefully learning the mathematics and techniques but would rather go for the ideas, a slightly harder book is a gem, Feynman's "Lecture notes in physics." Three volumes, each worth their weight in gold. That man can explain things.

    For quantum mechanics, the best intro book for someone with a technical background is probably D. J. Griffith's "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics." Very friendly writing style and overall good, although the way he covers a few topics still makes me wince a bit. The background needed for this is calculus up through basic differential equations, and linear algebra.

    For general relativity, AFAIK there aren't any books which are both good and "exciting." The two most common books to start with are either Schutz's "A first course in general relativity" or Hawking & Ellis' "The large-scale structure of space-time." Both are a bit on the dry side, but can quickly get you up to spin. I'd recommend the latter more for someone who just wants to survey the field, since although it's harder to learn the technical basics from it, it gets on more quickly to exciting topics such as black holes and cosmology.

    For things like field theory and string theory, unfortunately your choice is either Brian Greene's book and similar nontechnical works, or jumping straight into hardcore texts like Green, Schwarz & Witten or Polchinski. Not for the faint of heart, but quite nifty. If anyone knows any mid-range-technical books on this, I'd be glad to hear about it...

    And finally, an ObPlug for an upcoming book: In the not-too-far future there should be a book by Lindesay and Susskind on the quantum theory of black holes which promises to be very neat, though definitely on the technical side. (Conflict of interest notice: Susskind is my thesis advisor. But he's remarkably good at teaching this)

  296. Other Worlds by Paul Davies... by bythescruff · · Score: 1

    ...is an excellent explanation of the more interesting bits of quantum mechanics, aimed at the layman, but perfectly enjoyable by physicists as well.

    I wholeheartedly recommend another of Davies' books, God and the New Physics, which is about what QM and relativity can tell us about our beliefs.

    --
    Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
  297. The Science of Discworld by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Fine book, mixing science with a yarn about Rincewind and the other Unseen University wizards.

    The Turtle Moves.

  298. Newtonian Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Here is free introductory book on basic physics:

    Newtonian Physics

  299. Michio Kaku by jpthegeek · · Score: 1

    www.mkaku.org


    I have read everything he has written except the textbooks. Hyperspace and Visions will give you a very low level intro to quantum mechanics, chaos and various other mind bending topics.


    From there you might try "In Search of Schrodenger's Cat". I can't think of the author offhand but Amazon is sure to have it.

  300. Exercise caution by NCFlipper · · Score: 1

    While I'm sure that Gribbin has written very accessible books, I would be careful of reading too much into his material. I've read "Schrodinger's Kittens", and as a physicist I found that some of the things he wrote were misleading.
    If his work gives you a taste for physics then great, but if you are going to start discussing physics afterwards you may do well to work through a real text-book.

    1. Re:Exercise caution by /Idiot\ · · Score: 1


      you've prob. got a point there :-)

      --
      /dev/Idiot/
  301. Anything by Michio Kaku by Warshadow · · Score: 1

    Check out any book by Michio Kaku. He does a great job of making physics understandable to a person of average intellect.

    I thought Hyperspace was a great book; pick it up if you're interested in theoretical Physics.

  302. Good Place to Start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay,

    Firstly a commentary then an answer.

    Never think that people on slashdot have a clue about physics... Some do, some don't but on average I see more people on here that had a semester of physics, didn't get it, and are very vocal, than people that actually know even the basics.

    Now, best place to get cheap physics books... Well, I think the best place is any school (college/university)bookstore at the end of the semester! There will be a table set up for students to sell back their old (last semester) books and you can legally and with no hassle (usually) stand right there and get a nice $80 text from a student who probably barely opened it for like $25, and that happy student will be glad you are there, as the bookstore is probably offering $20 for that book.

    Also, many physics majors are happy (once they reach junior/senior level) to tutor for a small fee! (free if you just show interest and they are TAing already!

    Just a thought.

    Oh, by the way, physics is very math intensive, books for courses like Physics for Poets are what you want if you do not want to spend some time reviewing algebra/calculus/differential equations (depending on the level you wish to take your understanding to)

    Good Luck!

  303. Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's... by penultimatepost · · Score: 1
    Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy by Kip Thorne. It is very enjoyable. Basically a funny compendium of history and actual Physics. it is mostly about Relativity although it also touches on Newtonian mechanics. Mr. Thorne's examples are witty and to the point. Highly recommended

    (Also In search of Schroedinger's cat by John Gribbin)

  304. Intermediate level books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jose / Saletan: Classical dynamics : a contemporary approach

    A good book on advanced classical mechanics. This might be handy for example in game programming.

    Sakurai: Modern quantum mechanics

    A really comprehensive book on QM, though you'll probably need to read a lighter book first, and you'll need some math for understanding this one.

    John Baez: Knots, Gauge theories and gravity

    A wonderful melange of some essential math (differential forms, group theory, some topology), and physics (gauge field theory, general relativity, and even some quantum gravity!)
    You'll probably need some college level math before this book.

    Frankel: The geometry of physics: An introduction

    Some math that is used a lot in theoretical physics: Differential geometry, algebraic topology, etc. This book is about the same level as Baez' book.

  305. For the serious novice. by guybarr · · Score: 2


    if you have fair mathematical background I suggest:

    classical mechanics: Herbert Goldstein.

    Electromagnetism: Jackson.

    basic QM: Resnick.

    QM: Cohen-Tanoudjy + Sakurai.

    solid-state: Ashcroft-Merman.

    these are, IMHO, the best undergraduate texts I read. If you don't have enough copies in the library, invest your dollars in them, it will pay.

    other nice texts are:

    statistical physics: Greiner, Neise and Stocker.

    Q.M.: Merzbacher (advanced)

    plasma physics: Krall & Trivelpiece.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
    1. Re:For the serious novice. by EricWright · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but no one who is not a physics grad student should EVER pick up Jackson's Electromagnetism book. That is THE most feared book at nearly every physics grad school in the country, and for good reason. Most interested novices, for interest, wouldn't even understand the phrase 'integrating around the poles'.

      Eric

    2. Re:For the serious novice. by guybarr · · Score: 1


      I'm sorry, but no one who is not a physics grad student should EVER pick up Jackson's Electromagnetism book.

      please read my original post, it is intended for people with a fair mathematical background , which means second-year math/engineering/phys undergraduates, or people with the corresponding background from other sources.

      I certainly do not agree only grads should read Jackson. In my university (HUJI, in my physics studies) it was the text of choice, and IIRC second-years usually handled it quite well. If it is too hard for most undergrads in your university, then perhaps something is lacking in the first-year studies.

      Most interested novices, for interest, wouldn't even understand the phrase 'integrating around the poles'.

      reread my comment about math background.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
  306. phys books by mouloid · · Score: 1

    Tao of Physics by Fritjaf Kapra and Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy are two real good books.

  307. I'll begin with ... by mbennis · · Score: 0

    cosmix banditosby A.C WEISBECKER, Never had I read such a hilarious, nonsensical, and metaphysical book. If only more people had heard of "cosmic Banditos," I truly think it would have become a genuine cult classic. If you haven't read this tale of drugs, corruption, fate, Mexican spoofs and ... QUANTUM PHYSICS, now is the time to BUY IT.
    You'll thank me after....

  308. i'll begin with by mbennis · · Score: 0

    a book called COSMIX BANDITOS by A.C WEISBECKER, Never had I read such a hilarious, nonsensical, and metaphysical book. If only more people had heard of "cosmic Banditos," I truly think it would have become a genuine cult classic. If you haven't read this tale of drugs, corruption, fate, Mexican spoofs and ... QUANTUM PHYSICS, now is the time to BUY IT.

    Warning: This book is warped, and your mind may be too after you've finished reading it. _Cosmic Banditos_ is an examination of the wonders of quantum physics, couched in a South Ameircan drug-runner's quest for enlightenment. The physics is accurate. I know. I have no personal knowledge about the bizarre lifestyles portrayed, nor do I want to. The combination, though, of physics and somewhat insane crooks is unforgetable. This is not a book for the culturally timid, but it is an absolute treasure for those sufficiently off the wall to read it.
    You'll thank me after....

  309. Just don't get any of these by Quila · · Score: 2
  310. Halliday and Resnick by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
  311. Instant Physics and There are no Electrons by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Some personal favorites.

  312. "The Mechanical Universe" by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


    The Mechanical Universe is a fantastic series produced by Caltech and the Annenberg/CPB Project. I watched it on my local PBS station when I was a whippersnapper. Not only will it give you solid physics, Caltech professor David Goodstein gives you biographical and historical insight into the minds and times of the principal scientists. The info is often humorous. The story about Galileo's finger will crack you up. I'm not exaggerating when I say it will even change your life. I think the insights I gained from this series had a big impact on how I turned out (and I'm still turning.)

    The video format is invaluable for physics instruction because physics very often involves changing quantities (hence the need for calculus.) The series is chock full of brilliant animations to illustrate complex formulae and phenomena. The section on angular momentum is an excellent example. (Dot products, dot products)

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  313. Novice physics book by dchrome · · Score: 1

    For an introductory level, I would recommend Physics: A Self Teaching Guide.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/04 71 134473/qid=1031683760/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-962880 2-9631840?v=glance&s=books&n=173507

    --
    Official beta tester of the 21st century... Linux security...to mend and defend. Crusin' around in my modemmobile.
  314. Re:Any of the Feynman Lectures ... will kill you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are such a braindead thing as to not understand even physics, just like some of the students Richard Feynman had to deal with, get a good Phy. prof. to teach you, or forget.

    AND DON"T SPREAD ANTI-FEYNMANN FUDs