Slashdot Mirror


Downsides to Intrafamily IM?

Frisky070802 writes "The NY Times has run a column on how many families now use instant messaging within a household, for instance to ask what someone wants for dinner. This is especially popular as whole houses get wired (or wireless) and computers are scattered throughout the house. This is the case at my house but I tend to be the only one who stays on AIM reliably. Can Slashdotters offer some personal experience, pro/con, with being instantly and constantly accessible to one's spouse and children? Does this tend to break down your 'personal time'?"

514 comments

  1. Non-Indentured Servitude link by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1, Informative

    click here for google link

    Why can't people just do this by default? It took me 2 seconds to find...

    1. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'm sorry. Did I say that out loud?
      But seriously, what is it with mods always modding the top lines way up like that?

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's hilarious! I was 2nd post and got redundant. It's gonna be another one of those days where all mods are on crack isn't it?

    3. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Frisky070802 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why can't people just do this by default?

      I didn't refer to the google cache of the article because the google cache isn't intended to bypass site registration policies.

      Why can't people register, for free, without complaining?

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    4. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Slayk · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why can't people register, for free, without complaining? Well, I for one don't enjoy tossing my information about willy-nilly just to read an article.

    5. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by fastidious+edward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then don't read the article.

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    6. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 4, Funny


      Well, I for one don't enjoy tossing my information about willy-nilly just to read an article

      Psssst...don't tell anyone I told you this, but...you don't have to use your real information.

    7. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by gangien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because we DON'T FUCKING WANT THE FUCKING NEW-YORK TIMES TO FUCKING KNOW WE READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE.

      THEN DON'T READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE Seriously, you want your cake and to eat it. Tough beans, you're using their resources they have every right to do what they're doing. But of course complain because people are spying on you or whatever.

    8. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

      Just use the slashdot account - available for everyone on the site to use, for free, without registering

      Username: slashdotreader
      Password: slashdot

      I've been using this account for years now . . . never registering for my own account yet.

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    9. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Have+Blue · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They already know you read the fucking article, your browser sends their server your IP and useragent. Exactly what do you think is going to happen to you once the NYT has your name? Ninjas assassins jumping through the window? Men is black suits with video cameras following you around? Children kidnapped for reading such a subversive site? Or even, horror or horrors, THE VERY SLIGHT CHANCE OF GETTING ADVERTISEMENTS WHICH YOU CAN IGNORE ANYWAY. OH THE HUMANITY

    10. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey moron, that's the Google News affiliate link, not a cache.

      Times gets what they want, Google gets what they want, users aren't annoyed. No downside, unless yer a moron.

    11. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, We want our cake on equal terms. Why should google users get special treatment over slashdot users? Descriminating against a website filled with hackers is probably not the best idea, they're lucky the worst we're doing is sharing reg info (rather than, oh, say, registering dozens of accounts each killing any use in marketing the data)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    12. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Psssst...don't tell anyone I told you this, but...you don't have to use your real information.

      You most certainly do -- the NYTimes requires a valid email address, and giving it to them is a sure-fire way to increase your daily spam intake.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    13. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by alex_ant · · Score: 1

      that's what your stupidwebregistrations@yahoo.com address is for.

    14. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Frisky070802 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      the NYTimes requires a valid email address, and giving it to them is a sure-fire way to increase your daily spam intake.

      This is rubbish. I give them a tailored email, so I can tell if that email is used for anything I don't want, and in addition, they have appropriate policies to control communications from them. No spam here.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    15. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      interesting:

      Member ID: slashdotreader
      E-mail address: abuse@slashdot.org

      Anyhow, i signed that email address up for a bunch of spam and then changed the password. Good day!

    16. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by kjd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I for one don't enjoy tossing my information about willy-nilly just to read an article.

      How about tossing it around pell-mell? Helter-skelter? Higgledy-piggledy?

    17. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Olathe · · Score: 1

      1) It's not the Google cache (look at the host), it's more a New York Times' affiliate link.
      2) Wasting my time is something that annoys me. Things that annoy me lead me to complain.

      Just thought I'd explain why I don't (I can, but that's my decision, not yours) stop complaining. You can talk all you want about how wrong or stupid or lazy I am for not registering, and I can just ignore your useless, trollish moralizing.

    18. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont require a real one, just a unique one with a valid MX record. I always use [anything]@nytimes.com ...then i check all the boxes in retaliation for making me fill out all the dumb, unecessary, questions (like they need to know someone's income just so they can read an article? please!). This way it floods their own systems ;)

      And, no, I don't answer the questions truthfully, and neither do most people, so it ruins the whole point of collecting statistics.

    19. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, if i stop at a local 7-11, wawa, the corner vender, whereever...I can have my cake and eat it, too...for a couple of bucks. Then no one knows who I am, or anything about me, but I pay a fee. Online, instead of a few dollars, you pay with information. Tit-for-tat, you gotta pay them for their work one way or another.

    20. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Ptraci · · Score: 1

      I have been registered with them for three years now and I only get about five spam messages a week.

    21. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Well, I for one don't enjoy tossing my information about willy-nilly just to read an article."

      1.) They don't do anything to verify that it's legit.

      2.) BFD.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "You most certainly do -- the NYTimes requires a valid email address, and giving it to them is a sure-fire way to increase your daily spam intake. "

      This is not true. They do not verify your address. Bet you didn't even try. So what's your real motivation. Trying to show off for Slashdot, maybe get a lil karma? Lazy? Bad experience you didn't want to share with us? Trying to sound intelligent by having an extreme opinion?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    23. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1
      the NYTimes requires a valid email address

      Now, did you even try? No, you didn't. You're just making stuff up.

      In case you do run into a place that requires a valid e-mail account, here are some instructions from me to you so you won't have this problem in the future:

      1. Create new AOL screen name. Hint: it doesn't have to be your real name.
      2. Dial in to AOL using the screen name you just created.
      3. Register at the website of your choice using the e-mail address for the new screen name.
      4. Wait for the confirmation e-mail. Click the link. Change the password to something you can remember.
      5. Cancel the screen name created in step 1.
      Voila.
    24. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by ParadoxDruid · · Score: 1

      Gah! That's too much spam. My main address is kept sacrosanct from web forms, and I get about one spam a month, if even. That one spam annoys me.

      The fact that spam is so prevalent that people accept it as a fact of life is sad.

      --
      This statement is solely an opinion. Kindly take it as such in all cases.
    25. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      root@nytimes.com is a valid email
      so are
      postmaster@nytimes.com
      webmaster@nytimes.com
      editor@nytimes.com
      comments@nytimes.com

      Not sure how many of those are actually checked by a human, but they will all pass the fake email check, which in many places is simply a regex that looks for the @ and the . with letters around them.

    26. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Merusdraconis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even easier - put in (what name you'd like)@mailinator.com. Check the confirm e-mail at mailinator.com, and that's it.

      Neat thing - mailinator accepts any e-mails going to it and automatically makes a new account with no password. So you don't even have to sign up beforehand. Very useful.

    27. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Most folks around here don't read the article anyway.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    28. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by Ptraci · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that what spam I get mostly has to do with causes or websites I've donated to or things I've actually bought. Nearly all of it is either political or from companies I've dealt with online or their affiliates, so it might not fit many people's definition of spam anyway. I never get any of the pronographic or Nigerian or fake drug varieties. Clearly none of what I get has any relationship to NYT or any of the other news sites I have signed up for. I wouldn't register for at least one LA publication because they wanted so much info that it was way too much hassle, but NYT wasn't that bad.

    29. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by STrinity · · Score: 1

      This is not true. They do not verify your address.

      Yes, they do. I remember quite clearly having to wait for their email so I could click the confirmation link. I remember because it took them over a bloody hour to send it out, by which point I'd decided against ever using their site again.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    30. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      When I posted that, I had a legitimate username and password, no verification. TRY IT.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    31. Re:Non-Indentured Servitude link by NateTech · · Score: 1

      That's why you run your own mailserver and you register for stuff like this with an address like "newyorktimescrap@domain.com" and alias it to your "registrations@domain.com" address.

      Then you find out exactly who sold you out to a mailing list company, and you can flame the hell out of them via their fax machine, with a real "Dear CEO..." letter...

      Yes, business faxes do get better results and only take a minimal amount of research to get the phone number and setting up your own e-mail to fax gateway so you're still just sending e-mail -- but they don't know that. ;-)

      --
      +++OK ATH
  2. this is stupid by SpacePunk · · Score: 5, Funny

    What ever happened to just screaming/yelling down a hallway?

    1. Re:this is stupid by fleener · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why talk to people when you can type to them? There are so many things that trouble me about a family that communicates by IM that I don't know where to begin. So I won't. I think I'll go find someplace to cry.

    2. Re:this is stupid by gears5665 · · Score: 1, Troll

      is that really the kind of home you want to live in?

    3. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the businessmodel! You are not "getting" it.

      1: Make free software.
      2: ?
      3: Scream when you want dinner.
      4: Profit!

    4. Re:this is stupid by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Typing is inherently better than speaking. ^_^ Plus, if you live in a decently sized house, (two floors with a basement, lets say) there's not always a hallway for you to yell down. Also, people on computers have a tendency to wear headphones. I'm wearing headphones right now.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    5. Re:this is stupid by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. Using ICQ when I'm upstairs and my wife's downstairs is way better than shouting up/down the stairs. Especially when the baby's sleeping.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    6. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you considered families that live in houses that are so big, you would have to choose between either not communicating at all, or using IM? Or one family member is upstairs, and the other is downstairs? Yeah, there are those intercom things, or you can use a phone (maybe an internal PBX), but IM is great when you already have the infrastructure. I would throw Voice-over-IP into the mix personally.

      Also, it is cool to IM between roommates/family because you can send links or copy and paste, etc. Its easier to help someone with their computer using IM, then with verbal communication.

      Considering how much time people spend in front of the computer, this is a good thing because it allows them to communicate even if they are glued to the PC.

    7. Re:this is stupid by OS24Ever · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well in my house when it's 2AM and I'm still playing SWG or DAOC my wife yelling up the stairs would wake up our 2 yr old and 4 month old pretty quickly.

      Also, as us geeks make money we tend to get bigger houses where yelling between floors isn't as easy as it used to be (at least that's the case at my place) and sometimes the IMs I get are along the lines of ...

      'Come Downstairs and start the grill please'

      "Come downstairs and start the grill - i'm hungry'

      'When are you going to come downstairs and start the grill'

      'If you don't start the grill I'm going to cook the steaks on a broiler!'

      She started it, and she's the normal person of the house.

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    8. Re:this is stupid by llamaluvr · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's sorta been a joke with my family. When I'm home, we'll usually have two computers working in the house (my laptop and their desktop). We have one 4-port router in the den, so both computers are generally in there. My mom has given up telling me in person to clean my room, so, we'll both be typing away in the same room 3 feet away from each other, and all the sudden I'll get an IM from her asking why I haven't cleaned my room. I've been tempted to block her ;-).

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    9. Re:this is stupid by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The only time I've ever seen a house so big that it's too far to walk upstairs, they have servants to do this for you.

      Walking up a flight of stairs will not kill you. In fact, it will do a lot of good.

    10. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is slashdot... it's okay to actually use those invectives without intentionally misspelling them to preserve our moral dignity (we have none). Perhaps if you did that, you could vent your frustration without having to use caps excessively.

      Good luck with that.

    11. Re:this is stupid by LC+Gundo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: The deal on laptop batteries and my shaver's but not yours http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: Not your shaver that is Yahoo! Messenger:

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net has signed back in

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: Do you think this really goes on? http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/03/18 28205&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=95

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: I think it is BS. Check your e-mail.

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: ok

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: this can't be happening

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: Hey, how do you set default browsers and other internet applications in Panther?

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: mmmm nope

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: Ah ha! You do it in Safari. And you can set default mail client in Mail.

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: ooo

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: cool

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: you fed the dog, right?

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: ya

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: do you mind if I copy this stuff for a /. post? I'll munge our IDs.

      [kid]@sbcglobal.net: sure thang

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    12. Re:this is stupid by eyeye · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever had this message:
      "Son, I know you didnt notice me come in but could you jerk off to net porn after i've finished checking my email?" ;-)

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    13. Re:this is stupid by JamesP · · Score: 0

      Can I have the RFC number for that, please?

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    14. Re:this is stupid by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well in my house when it's 2AM and I'm still playing SWG or DAOC my wife yelling up the stairs would wake up our 2 yr old and 4 month old pretty quickly.
      'Come Downstairs and start the grill please'


      What kind of weird kinky game are you playing that involves a grill at 2AM? : )

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:this is stupid by LC+Gundo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, and in addition, I find that my kid learns by example.

      So, it is an opportunity to expose him to proper grammar and business form (hoo boy, I'd better preview this post).

      I must admit, when messaging him, I often lapse into im form using all lower case and using the usual short cuts my kid's generation uses (that learning by example thing works both ways).

      I don't think my im use has been detrimental to my communication at work, yet--except for that time I blurted out to the senior applications manager "and you'll get mad props from the help desk for finally getting rid of the last printer on IPX."

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
    16. Re:this is stupid by fleener · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thanks for your biggotry, but I'm an atheist. Silly me, I believe in talking to my kids face-to-face. How old fashioned, huh?

    17. Re:this is stupid by fleener · · Score: 1

      No, I can't say I've ever considered raising a family in a home where it's easier to type a message to them than to speak to them. I would never subject my kids to such an environment.

    18. Re:this is stupid by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Do you keep your IM client on while you play SWG or DAOC? Most people I know set themselves to "away" while they play a full-screen game, so that an incoming message won't shift the focus away from the game.

      The way around this, of course, is to get accounts for everyone else in your home. :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    19. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jee, you guys live in a big house. My family and I live in such a small place that IM translates to stretching out an arm to tap the other on the back, no matter where they are in the appartment.

    20. Re:this is stupid by Bishop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. What excellent grammar and business form you have. I see four one sentence paragraphs, and two run on sentences. I will ignore the parenthesis. Keep up the good work.

    21. Re:this is stupid by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with one sentence paragraphs?

    22. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mnyah, pish oaf!

    23. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this have to do with raising kids? What if you're a 25 year old living with your parents? Do you really need to go downstairs (or, since this is Slashdot, upstairs from the basement) just to communicate one sentence? (e.g. "you have a phone call", "I will be down in a minute, oh wait", "click the ok button", etc.)

      To say "this is stupid" is to be ignorant of the possibilities.

      Yes, you should talk to your family members face to face, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't IM them as well.

    24. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walking up a flight of stairs will not kill you. In fact, it will do a lot of good.

      When you're wanking, its much easier to IM your parents and say you'll be down in a minute to have dinner, rather than walk down the stairs, penis in hand, and say "can you at least @!$% wait till I finish jacking off?!?!!"

    25. Re:this is stupid by smacktits · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I always try to use proper grammar and spelling, whether it be on IRC, IM or anywhere else. To see people giving it the usual "lol omg wtf !!11!1!1!" or "n e 1 no how 2 do sumfin" makes me cringe. English is your mother tongue. Nurture it, don't assrape it.

    26. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of weird kinky game are you playing that involves a grill at 2AM? : )

      I take it you haven't had kids, have you?

    27. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sorta been a joke with my family. When I'm home, we'll usually have two computers working in the house (my laptop and their desktop). We have one 4-port router in the den, so both computers are generally in there. My mom has given up telling me in person to clean my room, so, we'll both be typing away in the same room 3 feet away from each other, and all the sudden I'll get an IM from her asking why I haven't cleaned my room. I've been tempted to block her ;-).

      You should respond with a link to the goatse.cx webpage - or at the very least an ASCII picture of it. Next time she'll have second thoughts before telling you what to do!

    28. Re:this is stupid by BlueRibbon · · Score: 1

      Long live fat!
      You can't walk a few meters to talk to your wife, but probably you can spend hundreds of dollars year on the gym...

      --
      KISS - Keep It Simple, Stupid!
    29. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fucking wonder Americans are so fat.

    30. Re:this is stupid by twoslice · · Score: 1
      I take it you haven'thad kids, have you?

      Maybe grilled kids at 2am doesn't sound very appetizing to him...

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    31. Re:this is stupid by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for upstairs/downstair a qaint pneumatic delivery systems that banks use in drive through service lines.

    32. Re:this is stupid by elmegil · · Score: 1

      If it's a quick "I would like an answer to this question" type thing, why the hell should I have to go downstairs, spend 10 seconds talking to her, and walk back upstairs? Who said I needed to spend any money on a gym? Sorry, you seem to have confused the idea of "instant messaging" with "real conversation", which I am quite capable of having with her face to face any and all times it is necessary. I even walk to where she is to do it! Nimrod.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    33. Re:this is stupid by BlueRibbon · · Score: 1

      I misjudged your post! You seemed one of those lazy guys :)

      --
      KISS - Keep It Simple, Stupid!
    34. Re:this is stupid by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "What ever happened to just screaming/yelling down a hallway?"

      Hey dad!! DAAAAAAAAD! Go to ay ess kay dot ess el ay ess H (I don't know how to spell H) dee oh tee dot oh ar gee slash see oh em em ee eh tee ess dot pee el question mark es eye dee equals 91426 and symbol see eye dee equals 7867909... that comment was really funny! What? Emai? Okay.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    35. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because that was really the funniest, most pleasant, and most of all CLEVEREST thing I've seen all day.

      Please.

    36. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You need some hyphens, and you should get rid of the comma:
      I see four one-sentence paragraphs and two run-on sentences.
      The plural of parenthesis is parentheses. What do you mean when you say you will ignore them? It's not clear. Keep up the good work.
    37. Re:this is stupid by fleener · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, face-to-face communication has nothing to do with raising kids! What planet are you from?

    38. Re:this is stupid by azuretek · · Score: 1

      me and my brother do this all the time, when I'm playing a game and so is he we'll yell at eachother what to do during the game.

    39. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. What's the point of abbreviating everything so you save about ten keystrokes? Besides butchering the language, all it really does is make it damn near impossible to read. Seriously, unless you're retarded and can't type faster than 1 key a second, write the whole damn word. You can spend the extra half-second doing it right.

    40. Re:this is stupid by Bishop · · Score: 1

      You need some hyphens

      The Oxford English Dictionary disagrees. As does my English textbook. The use of the comma was optional. In this case I felt that the comma was usefull to separate the items in the list.

      The plural of parenthesis is parentheses

      My mistake.

      What do you mean when you say you will ignore them?

      I did not wish to comment on the parentheses. In general I feel parentheses are used poorly, and should be avoided. In this specific case I do not feel that either parenthesis was appropriate for business form. Nor is what I am typing now appropriate. It is far to personal. However it was not meant to be an example of business anything. My English is nothing to write home about. However, I do try to be correct. I felt obliged to comment after reading the original poster's comment: "I'd better preview this post."

    41. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that worked when I was a kid, then we moved into a house with big room in the basement, which became my bedroom, and whenever somebody wanted me, they would just stomp on the floor. I still hate the sound of stomping from upstairs. My kids ignore me when I yell, and they've put me in their blocked list, so I'm forced to get off my kiester, walk all the way to their room, and actually TALK to them! Sheesh!

    42. Re:this is stupid by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

      Of course not, I'm a True Geek (tm)

      I have a Powerbook G4 that I surf the web with and IM with while I'm playing games :)

      --

      As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    43. Re:this is stupid by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      [dad]@sbcglobal.net: Hey, how do you set default browsers and other internet applications in Panther?

      Can't you do that in the same place as 10.2, ie. under the "internet" control panel thingie? I think it's the last tab in the list... :)

    44. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the OED says run on, with no hyphen, I guess I'll have to accept it. I think run-on, with the hyphen, is better though. Webster's says run-on. You do need the hyphen in "four one-sentence paragraphs". Do a search on this page for "numerics" for some examples.

      In "I see X and Y" you don't normally need a comma to separate the two items. Style guides say you should use commas in lists of three or more items. The comma-and in "I see X, and Y" looks like it might be signalling that a fresh independent clause is coming up, which could trip up the reader momentarily. Style guides also recommend that you use as few commas as you can get away with.

      I do understand that that guy opened himself up to attack by bragging about his grammar. But so did you by attacking him, and so do I by attacking you. That's just a rule of the game. It's just a bit of fun.

    45. Re:this is stupid by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Indeed - is this a wind up question? You use an IM to talk to your family?!?? in the same friggin house?!?

      Get help dude. Quickly.

    46. Re:this is stupid by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      The plural of parenthesis is parentheses.

      But there is only one of them. A phrase (like this one) set inside of curved marks is a parenthesis.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    47. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, thanks. I was wrong.

    48. Re:this is stupid by Sea+Chicken · · Score: 1

      I agree. It worked for me as a kid. Here's a thought - unplug and engage in face-to-face conversation ;)

    49. Re:this is stupid by Sea+Chicken · · Score: 1

      I grew up in a big house. Even without intercoms and the like, we still managed to communicate effectively by getting off your arse and finding out where the other person (people) were and talking to them. This is a pet hate of mine - people who prefer to use electronic communication (be it email, sms, IM or the like) over direct physical communication, especially in an environment as a house or in the same office. It's amazing how lazy people are becoming when the choice is to email (IM, sms, etc.,) someone who's either next to you or a very short walk away.

    50. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using 10.3.2, and I have no "Internet" control panel. I don't remember when they took it out, it may have been there in 10.3.0? In any case the new method is a pain in the ass, they should bring back the internet control panel.

    51. Re:this is stupid by topham · · Score: 1

      Just to confuse things they've located those under the options for the tool. ie: go into Safari to change the setting of the default browser. (or IE I suppose).

    52. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Away messages suck. When I play online rpg's I get a real advantage by having another computer to web browse/im on-but of course I pay the price of being the one every other player asks for help, because I'm the one who can look up any stats, maps, and references in two seconds.

      and of course, I can cheat in games by logging in from both computers as separate characters. This is lots of fun in team based first person shooters, where you can spectate the enemies. And still be on aim because I have an old 3rd computer.

    53. Re:this is stupid by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      Besides.... AOL is the devil... So is SCO, and Microsoft. And so is the devil. Where was I going with this? i forgot.

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    54. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary, Microsoft saved my love life, AOL found my lost puppy and SCO fixed my flat tire when I got trapped on the expressway. So you can just shut your fucking filthy hole and like it.

    55. Re:this is stupid by damiam · · Score: 1

      One-sentence paragraphs and run-on sentences don't violate any rules, they're just bad style. This is Slashdot. Bad style is quite appropriate here.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    56. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail at life!

    57. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, troll!

      OWNED by the religious right.

    58. Re:this is stupid by Undenied · · Score: 1

      on a serious note: my sister and I used to scream and shout messages and now that everyone in my family has a computer or laptop w/ wi-fi, we REALLY do im each other with messages. The Stress level has gone from a 10 to a 5. If anything IMing has helped my relationship with my sis!

    59. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My foot tastes good too," should also be in your post.

    60. Re:this is stupid by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      LOL! U KCK ASS!

    61. Re:this is stupid by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I don't think my im use has been detrimental to my communication at work, yet--except for that time I blurted out to the senior applications manager "and you'll get mad props from the help desk for finally getting rid of the last printer on IPX."

      Piffle, that's nothing. The military has started using chat software to communicate in real time over secure networks, and you'd be surprised at the amount of netspeak that gets used in them. During the war, I was in a chatroom with about twenty other people scattered from England through Saudi Arabia (I was in Turkey, in the Nortern Command Center, at the time). When Shock and Awe was just about to start, one of the guys in Saudi said something about "mad Tomahawk skillz"; reports like "4th ID 0wnz the RG" (Fourth Infantry Division...Republican Guard) in quick after-action summaries were common. These weren't in the official reports, mind you, just in the chatrooms.

      Just because it started on the net, doesn't make it unprofessional. Or maybe it's, just because the military does it, doesn't make it professional? 'Course, the Navy and Marines use Counter-Strike to teach small unit tactics, so maybe it is the latter.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    62. Re:this is stupid by nycsubway · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to just screaming/yelling down a hallway?

      Thats what I'm talking about! That is how I was raised, and it worked just fine. I plan to make sure IMs from my children are thoroughly ignored. If they want to talk to me, they can walk the 20 feet into the next room and talk. Or they can yell down the hall.

    63. Re:this is stupid by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      "Also, as us geeks make money we tend to get bigger houses where yelling between floors isn't as easy as it used to be..."

      What you need is a horn, like they used on steamships (as in "get on the horn"). Basically, a pipe from the wheelhouse to the engine room that tranmits sound (Cap'n: "FULL STEAM AHEAD!!!" Scotty: "Cap'n, Cap'n ... the dilithium crystals canna take any more!") between the two rooms.

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    64. Re:this is stupid by svallarian · · Score: 1

      nah...she's probably just pregnant...again.

      Steven V.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
    65. Re:this is stupid by Tassach · · Score: 1

      My house is about the same size as yours. My wife's computer is in the basement. Mine is on the second floor. We use IMs or windows messaging [net send ] frequently. Why? Several reasons. Why run two flights of stairs to say "Honey, please bring the dirty laundry downstairs" or "Remember to feed the cats before you come up" or "What's the link to that web site you were telling me about?" Shouting up the stairs is not an option when the baby is taking a nap. IM makes a handy quick & dirty intercom.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    66. Re:this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly...that's why I ran extra conduit when I cabled the house with Cat5... so everybody can yell unicast into the appropriate room

  3. Cons? by CeleronXL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone in my family uses AIM to communicate around the house. There aren't really any cons to it aside from the fact that it tends to make you lazier and you lose the exercise of having to get up and walk to the person you want to talk to.

    1. Re:Cons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what options are there for those of us that dont need an internet connection, but just want a local IM app?

    2. Re:Cons? by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always the `net send' feature in the command prompt. You can just open a command prompt and type

      net send [computername] [message]

      Sometimes I'll send messages or URLs or whatnot to my server which doesn't have IM installed, and I just use

      net send HYDROGEN http://www.someurl.com/id.php?x=34624

    3. Re:Cons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Everyone in your family should be lined up and shot.

      They are anti-social freaks who must be purged from society.

    4. Re:Cons? by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but no thanks. The only one in my family like that is my brother, and ironically he is the one who will generally get up to talk to people.

    5. Re:Cons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, on the other hand, demonstrate very social behavior.

    6. Re:Cons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:Cons? by Chucow · · Score: 1
      I can only imagine, "Son, if you don't go set the table right now I'm going to warn you!" ::finger hovering over warn button::

      I use instant messenging sometimes, but often I find it easier and more beneficial to just walk down the hall to talk in person. This is particularly true when trying to see how family members messed up their computers. It's far easier to go in and check myself if the CAT5 came out of the wall than to try to describe it over IM.

    8. Re:Cons? by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

      If the CAT5 came out of the wall, you wouldn't be talking to them on IM anyway.. ;)

    9. Re:Cons? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Everyone in your family should be lined up and shot."

      What about families that use a whiteboard to leave notes for each other? What about people who make local phone calls? What about... ah I'm outta steam. Figure as long as we're taking to illogical extremes...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:Cons? by CeleronXL · · Score: 1

      Meh, just a troller. :P Funny that all of sudden I'm anti-social, but he's the one posting anonymously.

    11. Re:Cons? by Chucow · · Score: 1
      heh...good call...

      just a hastily drawn up example, idea still stands ;)

  4. instant messangers by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

    Does this tend to break down your 'personal time'?

    instant messangers... yeah, they always break down my personal time. that's why I 'apt-get remove'd them all.

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
    1. Re:instant messangers by jrockway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I add/remove program'd MSN messenger on windows and now windows won't boot :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:instant messangers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS is fucking insightful?! You really are a bunch of pricks.

    3. Re:instant messangers by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Lucky escape then ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:instant messangers by a20vertigo · · Score: 2, Funny

      hah! I removed Windows/MSN Messenger with XPLite, and my CPU turned into a quantum singularity!

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are; even before you arrive.
  5. beats bellowing down the stairs by dickens · · Score: 1

    I have a small house, but my wife knows I'm always on IM, so she does occasionally ask questions like "what's for dinner?"... I find it less intrusive than yelling through the house.

    1. Re:beats bellowing down the stairs by sreid · · Score: 1

      Combine that with voice recognition software and you coud be talking to her

    2. Re:beats bellowing down the stairs by rifter · · Score: 1

      Combine that with voice recognition software and you coud be talking to her

      Why bother? most im clients have voice chat built in, so there is no reason to translate speech into text :P

    3. Re:beats bellowing down the stairs by ethanms · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well why not just get some webcams and video-conference?

      "How's the weather in the living room dear?"

      "Just peachy snookums, let's go to www.pizzahut.com for dinner!"

      "Great idea pooky... let me just finish up my orders at www.peapod.com and www.netflix.com"

    4. Re:beats bellowing down the stairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      yes but if she came to you to ask the same question, you could reply "you are, baby" and fuck her brains out. try doing that with aim

  6. Back to back! by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sometimes my wife will use her PC while we're in my office, and when she wants to know where to find some stuff on the net, i'll usually just IM her a Google hit page..

    Also, I spent the summer working at a contract a couple hours away from home, and would frequently use AIM on my cellphone while at dinner to let her know that I was still at dinner and would be calling a little late that night. My little contribution to be one less person yelling into their cellphone in restaurants.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
    1. Re:Back to back! by isorox · · Score: 1


      Also, I spent the summer working at a contract a couple hours away from home, and would frequently use AIM on my cellphone while at dinner to let her know that I was still at dinner and would be calling a little late that night. My little contribution to be one less person yelling into their cellphone in restaurants.


      Something wrong with the much simpler and faster sms? Technology for technologies sake seems to get more and more prevalent as time marches on.

    2. Re:Back to back! by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      I can't say that I've had much use for sms or aim on a cell phone, but there is at least one reason to IM from your cell phone. If the person you are sending a message to doesn't have/carry a cell phone, but uses AIM all the time, sms won't do you much good.

    3. Re:Back to back! by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have another replier with a good point. I get a bunch of free inbound text messages but don't pay for 2-way messaging. I pay $5 for unlimited AIM. Plus, as the other replier said, she's always at home and would to run downstairs and fish through her purse to find her cellphone.

      This way, I don't have to teach her how to read and reply to SMS messages, too :) It took long enough to get her to skillfully use Gaim. In fact, we're in the midst of another "she lost her cellphone somewhere in the house" incident, so SMS would *really* be out of the question!

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    4. Re:Back to back! by isorox · · Score: 1

      The difference in culture on both sides of the pond is amazing. Here in the UK, pretty much everyone has at least one mobile phone, and almost all of those have it in their pocket all the time. Text messaging is free to recieve, and most plans are free to send (aisde from pay as you go). People don't use instant messaging as much though (I have a 7 figure ICQ number from the early days, but haven't logged on for years), and certainly aren't always on their computers. The growth in the UK of mobile communication a few years ago was caused by teenagers getting pay-as-you-go phones and using sms.

    5. Re:Back to back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't calling her cell phone make it relatively easy to find it? duh.

    6. Re:Back to back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard the phone's battery dying a few days so its been off for a couple days now. Found the phone today, thanks for all your help.

  7. I have a simple paging protocol... by raytracer · · Score: 4, Funny

    It usually involves me yelling at the top of my voice. I envy those who have a house so large that my voice does not provide adequate coverage.

    1. Re:I have a simple paging protocol... by 56uSquareWave · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is a very simple solution to voice amplification, it requires a pringles can... joe

      --
      - meta language used, please apply your own spelling and gramma
    2. Re:I have a simple paging protocol... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      I live in a detached garage, what do I do to use this wireless technology? I considered making a chain of paper towel rolls from the garage to house for yelling through, what do you guys think?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:I have a simple paging protocol... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've actually done this. Covered three stories with speaking tubes made out of scrounged plumbing and old garden hose.

      It worked too.

      If I were you I'd consider using wires though. They've invented this thing called the "intercom."

      Check it out.

      KFG

    4. Re:I have a simple paging protocol... by moderators_are_w*nke · · Score: 1

      If its too far to shout, there's no way 802.11 is gonna work....

      Mark

      --
      "XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, use more." - Anonymous Coward
    5. Re:I have a simple paging protocol... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      well, I did already do cable, ethernet, telephone, power, etc. maybe I should consider utilizing these for communication somehow.

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
  8. My problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My problem is having way too much virtual sex with my sister... it's taking a toll on our real social lives.

    1. Re:My problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point in using IM if you're living in a cramped trailer in a trailerpark anyway?

    2. Re:My problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately for me, when you're having virtual sex with your sister you aren't paying attention, so I can have real sex with you mom!

    3. Re:My problem by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      AKA imcest.

  9. Personal time between spouses by neostorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This definitely breaks down personal time between my Girlfriend and I. We share a 1 bedroom apartment, and everyday she and I go our seperate ways to work. While working we usually chat back and forth constantly about current events, what that nights plans are, etc. But I've found over the last several years that when we both arrive home together that evening, there's nothing left to talk about.

    It hasn't really damaged our relationship at all, which is nice to know, but it does says something for instant communication while apart.

    1. Re:Personal time between spouses by Peridriga · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have sex then when your not talking...

      Not like your keeping her around for her 'fab' shoe collection are you?

    2. Re:Personal time between spouses by Selecter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe you should step away from the IM for a bit, and are you sure she feels the same way about it that you do? Women are quite a bit less inclined to want to communicate through a device. They crave one on one personal interaction and I dont think going thru IM counts. Maybe you have a exception there, but I bet she misses curling up on the couch with you and talking about things. When you get home and there's nothing left to talk about, I think it says you're spending too much time connected to each other. Smothering your wife is just as bad as ignoring her, I think. The trick is balancing everything. Why dont you ask her tonight straight up if she misses those days where you would sit down and catch up with each other? Bet she will surprise you.

    3. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it always expected that it's the men who will have to adapt to the way women want to communicate.

    4. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most of us are stupid and will go along with it as long as we'll "get some" later at night.

    5. Re:Personal time between spouses by Bishop · · Score: 1

      When you are at work, work. When you get home tell each other about your day. True interactive communication is a far richer experience then IM. Having anything to talk about, even the mundane details of your day, is really just a backdrop to a more complex, and important, social interaction.

    6. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This definitely breaks down personal time between my Girlfriend and I.
      Bah! Lies and trickery. I don't even think these so-called "girls" really exist! Even if they do, I'm sure they find Slashdot so interesting. "You got modded up? What the hell does that mean?"

      Not like I'm bitter or jealous or anything.
    7. Re:Personal time between spouses by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      Thousands of years of human sociological evolution nicely summed up in a single sentence. Well done.

    8. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're asshole.

    9. Re:Personal time between spouses by neostorm · · Score: 1

      I see where you're coming from, but I'm not making assumptions on my own. We have excelent communication both ways and i'm not some guy who doesn't see the bigger picture. We still spend time together every evening, and we have specifically talked about this before which is why I can say it hasn't damaged our relationship. I was simply making an observation about our social habits as they are affected by instant messaging.

    10. Re:Personal time between spouses by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Have sex then when your not talking...

      You're not married, are you?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    11. Re:Personal time between spouses by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      I read "Personal time between spouses" as the breaktime between Wife 1.0 and 2.0.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    12. Re:Personal time between spouses by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      That's not entirely true.

      I rather enjoyed random conversation, or a bursted comment during intercourse. It allowed for a laugh from her, enough to distract, and was a good lead into something pleasant and unexpected. ;)

      Your second line is rather mean. I'm sorry you have to feel that way.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    13. Re:Personal time between spouses by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with this. As the grandparent poster mentioned, I had the same problem with a now ex girlfriend. We spent all the time talking on IM, so when we were actually together, there was nothing really to talk about (or so we thought). I didn't realize until after the relationship was over, that I never really got to know that much about her, since we didn't spend as much talking to each other (and listening). New rule I have, is to minimize online conversations to only basic facts and stuff, and if I can, to use a phone or face to face communication instead.

    14. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marriage counselling from Slashdot users should come with a warning label - Use At Own Risk.

    15. Re:Personal time between spouses by Selecter · · Score: 1

      Ok, glad to see, and glad you did not take my post as a attack of some kind. Carry on!

    16. Re:Personal time between spouses by danila · · Score: 1

      I don't want to sound harsh or impolite, but may be you should find more things to talk about with your girlfriend. I mean, night plans are just overhead and current events are just filler. If you want a rich and interesting relationship there should be other things between you, like talking about life, future plans, philosophy, books you read, movies you saw, projects you work together on, etc., etc. And these topics can't be exausted through an IM-chat.

      P.S. Obviously I don't know the details of your relationships, so the above may not apply to you at all. Don't take offence.
      P.P.S. I am aware that having a rich and fulfilling relationship is not easy. Again, don't be offended.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    17. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Why dont you ask her tonight straight up if she misses those days where you would sit down and catch up with each other? Bet she will surprise you.
      This is also known as a loaded question. If you ask it, you're telling her you miss those days , and you're begging her to tell you "Yes, I miss those days too."
    18. Re:Personal time between spouses by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      this completely goes against what another poster said... that it's the female that generally wants the one-on-one conversation. i find this difficult. my girlfriend is still in school and living there. she gets in these "moods" where she would rather me tell her a really long drawn out story on IM than call me up (or vice versa) and tell her into the phone in a much more personal manner. i for one think that the modern female is moving against the grain into a more IM type conversation since we all know that the majority of college-aged females use IM literally all the time. they're on it at their college jobs (i have a bunch that answer phones at the helpdesk i work at), they're on it in their dorm rooms, they're on it when they go home for breaks, they're on it with their cell phones (generally that's more SMS than wireless AIM, but still), they're on it when using a computer lab to write a paper or in a class that utilizes the lab. they talk to their boyfriends on IM more than they're on the phone. what was the phone of the 80's and 90's for girls has turned is now IM. and they all have 100+ buddies, of whom, they only talk to like 5, but you never know, and besides, those others are good for reading away messages when you're waiting for your friend to get out of the shower or get back from lunch or class.

      seriously, it's quite odd how while we would think that women prefer the more traditional one-on-one or phone conversation over IM, the world is changing. it will ruin a relationship when you're chatting with your significant other all day and have nothing to say to each other when you see each other later on. there's no need for the 2 of you to be chatting at work about general everyday stuff. if you absolutely need to ask them something or are trying to get a reservation for a certain time or something like that, a short 5 min IM conversation is probably easier than calling, especially if personal calls are frowned upon. then when you do see each other and go out to eat or whatever, you'll have dinner conversation and won't be that couple taht goes into the restaurant orders, eats, and leaves withotu saying 2 words to each other other than maybe takling about the food or the restaurant. it's just a bad way of running a relationship. everyone needs their alone time, and honestly, work is one of those places where you get time away from your significant other, and it's not very professional to always be chatting online at work.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    19. Re:Personal time between spouses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as soon as someone opens up the criticism comes in, that's for sure. Hehe.

      As far as my relationship goes though, we have one of the most fulfilling relationships in the world, at least as far as the last several years have been. We are best friends, before and after the relationship started, and we have great communication and share everything online and off. IM has lessened the conversation topics at home, because we talk so much while online, but that's pretty much it. I really didn't mean to make it sound so negative at all, it was just a simple fact that I thought sharing would stir the conversation topic (boy did it).

      No offense taken though. Cheers!

    20. Re:Personal time between spouses by SuperDave913 · · Score: 1

      I am in the exact same boat. However there are usually stories she has not told me about, since they take too long to type... and give the right details. As a guy it is somewhat adventageous, since I then can relax and just chill when I get home. Sometimes I get home and just want some peace... not that she's annoying, but somedays we all have too many people talking/yelling at us! :-)

      I know for a fact that my girlfriend likes chatting while at work, as it helps her pass the day quicker... during her slow times of the day.

    21. Re:Personal time between spouses by jpostel · · Score: 1

      I don't know... For my wife and I, it is the low priority communication method. Being a corporate geek means that she might not see me outside of when the alarm goes off in the morning, so IM is a pretty good tool. We also speak to each other about once a day on the cell phone to just touch base.

      Inside the house we use IM sometimes too, if she knows I am doing work from home and I cannot be disturbed.

      We also have a phone system in the house that allows paging from any phone. It is not a loudspeaker system, but rather it rings a particular phone in the house, by dialing the extension. It's not really a business class system, because it only has two lines. The link to the phones for those that are interested:

      http://www.panasonic.com/consumer_electronics/te le phones/expandable_sys.asp

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
    22. Re:Personal time between spouses by thparker · · Score: 1
      While working we usually chat back and forth constantly about current events, what that nights plans are, etc. But I've found over the last several years that when we both arrive home together that evening, there's nothing left to talk about.

      It hasn't really damaged our relationship at all...

      ...but has stolen hundreds of hours of productivity from both of your employers.

  10. Okay, this is going to far. by bryanp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put the mouse down.

    Step away from the keyboard and nobody gets hurt.


    Now go out and interact with people. They're in the same friggin house with you fer chrissakes.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hey man, don't knock it til you've tried it. I think that IMing in my house encourages little interactions that wouldn't happen otherwise. My dad will link me to some news story or something while I am doing homework whereas he wouldn't have bothered to interrupt me if he had to print it out and bring it to my room.

      --
      Yawn.
    2. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      We don't IM, but use a PennMUSH shell.

      It really helps with communication, we can pass links back and forth and if theres something private we need to talk about when company is over, all I have to say is - go look on your screen.

      We've also worked out some Pennmush code that saves links we post and then exports them to a webpage so we can find old quicklinked bookmarks.

    3. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      My dad will link me to some news story or something while I am doing homework whereas he wouldn't have bothered to interrupt me if he had to print it out and bring it to my room.

      OK, IMing a link is one thing, since you either have to type it into the computer to send the IM or write it on a piece of paper. I frequently will e-mail my boss whose office is next door to mine) with documents or links, or a question to something that (a) isn't in need of immediate response AND (2) he is on the phone. I would IM him but we don't have an IRC server on our side of the firewall and can't IM through said firewall.

      BUT...if it is to have a regular conversation, then just get out of the chair and walk over to the other room and SPEAK.

      IM has its applications, don't get me wrong. It usually is cheaper than LD charges since you are online anyway (esp. with broadband connections) and it does allow for conversations to be held in not-so-realtime, a la voicemail, if the recipient is away from the keys. Plus, there is a record of what was said for reference later on (handy for use while at work.)

      But if it is to call somebody to dinner, take out the garbage, or see if homework was done...no.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    4. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by E_elven · · Score: 1

      That's *real* subtle.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    5. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by __aaaehb3101 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but after climbing the flights of stairs to ask if you want coffee made, IM says time and worn joints. PLus i have a freind with a disabled wife they can be in different rooms and still stay in touch.

    6. Re:Okay, this is going to far. by W1BMW · · Score: 1

      No, *I* worked out that PennMUSH code that saves links :)

      Artemus

  11. How big is your house? by jasonbowen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it so big that you can't just call out or walk for 10-15 seconds to talk to somebody? I've used IM clients to have a silent conversation in a crowded room before but not for regular communication at home.

    1. Re:How big is your house? by dan_polt · · Score: 1

      it so big that you can't just call out or walk for 10-15 seconds to talk to somebody?

      No, I live in a tiny student house, when we are too lazy to get up and get changed, we can chat in our tender state in cumfort. Great for getting code written..

    2. Re:How big is your house? by rifter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it so big that you can't just call out or walk for 10-15 seconds to talk to somebody? I've used IM clients to have a silent conversation in a crowded room before but not for regular communication at home.

      I had no idea what fucking luddites you slashdotters are. Do you have any idea what technology is for at all? The point is if I am working upstairs it is damned inefficient to walk all the way downstairs, stop waht I am doing, interrupt someone else, and stop what they are doing, just so I can ask them a one sentence question. It is stupid and unnecessary thanks to technology.

      We are not talking about ending family communication. That happened decades ago. We are talking about making it possible again. Families are busy, dispersed, and engaged in all sorts of distracting tasks. There are few chances for familial communication especially with the death first of nightly gatherings for reading and prayer and second with the death of the family dinner.

      I am not saying an effort to revive such practices is misguided, but what if you could talk to your family while doing other things? That is what instant messaging was invented for. It is there so you can talk to multiple people at once while coding, posting to slashdot, writing the great american novel, doing your homework, balancing the budget, or whatever it is you are doing on your computer. It means you can talk to the rest of the family and ask simple questions and make decisions together.

      Now that the rest of the family have computers, pdas, cell phones and such it is especially spiffy because you can text message and talk to your kids and family members to keep tabs on what they are doing and coordinate that family dinner that died so long ago for lack of coordination and communication.

      Also, the internet and instant messaging are great for people who do not live with their families. I communicate with the wired members of my family much more often simply because they are available to me. If you are back in the 19th century sending paper letters through snail mail you get much less communication.

    3. Re:How big is your house? by jasonbowen · · Score: 1

      I've sent text messages to cell phones via email. I've communicated via IM when it suited the situation. The original question brought up communicating at home via such methods. I can do those things you mention talking with somebody in the same room or via the hallway. Your physical distance scenarios are what makes IMing attractive, it's like the person is in the same room as you. I'll just have to disagree that you really are being more productive by IMing when you are in the the same house. When I first got DSL back in 99 my roomate and I thought it was funny to send email for stupid things for about an hour or two. My fiance and I will occasionally IM the other when we are in seperate rooms as jokes when the other is conversing with someone else. I just think it's another layer of seperation if you can't make the effort.

    4. Re:How big is your house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You didn't get the user experience right, though. It's more like:

      It is there so you can talk to multiple people at once while coding, looking at porn, posting to slashdot, looking at porn, writing the great american novel, looking at porn, doing your homework, looking at porn, balancing the budget, looking at porn, or whatever it is you are doing on your computer.

      Ain't IM great?

  12. Eh! by Starve · · Score: 1

    I don't like it because being the only true Nerd in the house, I get a lot of intrusions on life from a 13 year old brother who finds it fun in his spare time to take advantage of my good nature and techincal knowledge, many times ive had song lyrics and or stuff he shouldn't have seen shown to him by friends who get his AIM address I've tried blocking them but he managed to figure out how to undo such things and is now roaming free in the metasocial domain of my friends, constantly do i find myself explaining to my mom about why and how he saw a goresite a horsesex site and even Goatse, the kid just can't handle the internet yet and it shows. However the rest of my family still can't figure out how to use Earthlink so as for now I am safe.

    --
    You have been sig'd
    1. Re:Eh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just admit it, you and your brother are fags

    2. Re:Eh! by phliar · · Score: 1
      ... is now roaming free in the metasocial domain of my friends, constantly do i find myself explaining to my mom about why and how he saw a goresite a horsesex site and even Goatse
      So if you're the only true nerd in the house, don't you think you should take an active role in how your kid brother grows up on the 'net? Make it clear what the acceptable uses/websites are, on the honor system. If you don't trust the kid to do so, he's not ready for unsupervised 'net use. If you're the only person at home who can see this, you should chaperone him. Try explaining the situation to your parents, they're human too.
      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  13. Intrafamily IM by willith · · Score: 5, Funny

    HotMamma24242: hay guys wut up its dinnr time
    LittleBro33: cool
    OlderSis53137: i dont lik 2 eat im 2 fat
    DadInCharge98324: shut it oldersis youl eat wut ur mom telz u 2 eat and like it 2 lol
    LittleBro33: lolololol haha u got n trubl
    OlderSis53137: shut up il run aimnuke on u
    *LittleBro33 has disconnected
    HotMamma24242: its not nice to aimnuke ur brothr
    DadInCharge98324: ur gonna get a spankin
    OlderSis53137: no1 n this famly understands me i h8 u all
    HotMamma24242: but i made teriaki chikn

    1. Re:Intrafamily IM by nathan+s · · Score: 1

      I just have to say...this is brilliant.:-)

    2. Re:Intrafamily IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah man +5 funny all the way!

    3. Re:Intrafamily IM by CmdrGravy · · Score: 5, Funny

      OffcrDibbl4193: Hi this the LAPD, how can we help
      OlderSis531357: Hey OffcrDibbl cum rnd n arest my dad, he sez hes gonna sxuly abuse me
      OffcrDibble4193: Do you have any evidence of that mam ?
      OlderSis531357: Yeah luk at this:

      DadInCharge98324: ur gonna get a spankin
      OlderSis53137: no1 n this famly understands me i h8 u all

      OffcrDibble4193: OK, we'll be right around

    4. Re:Intrafamily IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, good one. Thanks willith.

      "its not nice to aimnuke ur brothr" hehe crazy mofo's

    5. Re:Intrafamily IM by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      MikeLjakson666: bedtime, evry1!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    6. Re:Intrafamily IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous_Coward2623: wtf

    7. Re:Intrafamily IM by SirASCII · · Score: 0

      Actually with my spouse being deaf, I find it 100 x better than signing...
      Until recently, when I bought her a new computer and networked it to mine, we had many conversations together just using a text editor. And lets not get into the SMS... I am sure my WPM is in the 20-30 range on a cell keypad.

    8. Re:Intrafamily IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u r the reason /. should have an extra-special score: 6

  14. Try talking to your family... by zoobaby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is ridiculous. Just physically walk into the room they are in and ask them "What do you want for dinner?" Are people becoming so lazy and scared of others (including family) that they can only communicate via IM, cell phones, email...ect.

    Trust me the small walk from room to room, will not affect your pear like body shape.

    1. Re:Try talking to your family... by irokitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hell, screw what they *want* for dinner, make something and put it on the table. Problem solved, my work is done here.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Try talking to your family... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      exact;y what I was thinking.. I can't realy remember my mom asking my what's for dinner. Except on the rare pizza exception.

      if I remember:
      mom"time for dinner"
      me"what are we having?"
      mom"tacos"
      me"I don't want tacos"
      mom"go to bed then."
      me "mmm tacos, my favorite!"

      dad:"better tacos then cowboy neals"

      actually, if the discussion was with my dad:
      me:"what are we having"
      dad:"hot snot and monkey brains."
      me:"oh, you made ham hocks and beans again?"
      dad: Whack.
      me" owww."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Try talking to your family... by zsau · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My mother sometimes sends me emails, which typically have to go all the way across the Pacific twice before they get to me. I generally ignore them and wait till she starts shouting. Sometimes I'll ignore that too and wait till she walks over here, but she's very stubborn and won't usually make that last step but sound like a cat desparate to get outside.

      --
      Look out!
    4. Re:Try talking to your family... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This IS NOT ridiculous. In my condo, my wife and I both have our computers in the basement. However the basement is divided into two sections, one section is finished, the other is not. And of course, I was relegated to the unfinished damp dark section... I'm married, what did you expect?

      Anyways, my array of computing resources make somewhat of a racket, so when she tries to yell at me from the other room, I can't hear her. Now you're probably thinking: "Open the frickin' door you moron!" to which I must tell you that I have 1 cat, 1 kitten, and 1 puppy. Well, they're not really all mine, they're mainly hers, but the point is they're not allowed in the unfinished portion of the basement. Why? They'd chew on all my cords and junk, so NO!

      So quite often my wife will IM me with her little random thoughts or requests. Saves me getting up all the time to go into the other room to find out what she just attempted to yell at me through the wall.

      Oh yes, and my wife and I talked a lot over IM when we were dating/engaged, to share events and thoughts thoughout the day, but rarely do so now. It's nicer to share those things face-to-face than via IM.

  15. way to whore it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why can't slashdot use the google partner link? Oh, I don't know, maybe because slashdot is not google?

    1. Re:way to whore it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then just change the partner part of the URL from "partner=GOOGLE" to "partner=GOATSE". Problem solved.

  16. Very useful by sl70 · · Score: 1

    IM is like our in-house intercom. For example, I'm at work in my office in the basement and the phone rings. It's for my 12 year-old son (way more often than not), who's in his room on the 2nd floor. Rather than yelling up the laundry chute for him to pick up the phone, I just IM him.

    --
    Thank God I'm an atheist!
    1. Re:Very useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to tell you this...but your son is a homosexual.

  17. Actually by Stigmata669 · · Score: 1
    I think it helps protect 'personal time.' My father can IM me something and I can dismiss him in a few keystrokes rather than having to chase him out of my room. My brother tends to ask me for help with homework via IM so I can point him in the right direction or go to physically help depending on the problem.

    In addition, when I travel, and for when I head off to college next year, it is much easier to send a quick IM rather than make a phone call.

    --
    Yawn.
    1. Re:Actually by knowles420 · · Score: 1

      My father can IM me something and I can dismiss him in a few keystrokes rather than having to chase him out of my room. cooldad15: son, we need to talk. sexrobot4000: stfu.

      --
      -knowles
  18. internet connection management by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    I use IM with my brother all the time. The thing is, he's in on the top floor and I'm 2 floors below in the basement.

    So at night whichever one of us goes to bed first send the other an IM saying to please manage the internet connection. This means that when the other one of us goes to bed, we start up my sister's kazaa or shut down the gateway computer. (We are still on dialup, there's no broadband out here.)

    It gets funny because sometimes I live in other cities for work purposes, but sometimes he still messages me at night, telling me to manage the internet connection and I have to remind him that I'm not even at home.

    It's also great when we want to remind the other one that the over timer is beeping and our food is done cooking.

    1. Re:internet connection management by michrech · · Score: 1

      It gets funny because sometimes I live in other cities for work purposes, but sometimes he still messages me at night, telling me to manage the internet connection and I have to remind him that I'm not even at home.

      If this isn't the biggest reason for people to get off their lazy asses and go talk to eachother, I don't know what is.

      What is this world coming to?

      --
      bork bork bork!
  19. Big Deal by weave · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It beats hollering around the house.

    I often get calls on my cell phone from my wife at the other end of the house. At least people are communicating. When I was a kid, my mother would do anything just to get a few words out of me. She would have loved all of these new communication devices.

    Maybe for those living in a trailer or shoebox, this concept is hard to understand! :)

    1. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoebox?! I resent that! I live in a computer-game box, you insensitive CLOD!

    2. Re:Big Deal by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      I often get calls on my cell phone from my wife at the other end of the house. At least people are communicating.
      Funniest thing I saw was on one of those big ass-articulated buses in $CITY_WITH_BIG-ASS_ARTICULATED_BUSES:

      (BRRRLINGDDR - phone rings - 8 people check their phones, but only one girl answers it)
      Hello? Hi, $GIRL_NAME!
      ...
      Oh, I'm on the bus.
      ...
      You too? Where is it? we're getting near $SHOPPING_MALL.
      ...
      What? Well, I'm sitting at the rear of the bus.
      ...
      Oh? You're at the front of the same bus, then!!!!

  20. Privacy, please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If my sisters or my parents found out my IRC-nick, I'd have to change it!

    Since locking the door no longer would keep them away. :|

  21. Personal time? by CelticWhisper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, I don't know about you, but in my experience I...oh, dammit! Hang on, my kid just IMed me, he needs help with his homework. I'll finish this later. To the living room I go...

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  22. KARMA WHORE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why can't people post this crap AC?

    Why can't people just do this by default? It took me 2 seconds Yeah, and it took me a similar time to register with NYTimes, we are using their service for free after all. And now I have a registration I can log into their website automatically without having to read through comments or looking at google, which saves me even more time

    FREAK

  23. A Blessing by SillySnake · · Score: 1

    I wish my family woulda done this when I was growing up. It woulda been nicer to avoid seeing them a little bit more.. No old wrinkled faces just before dinner, and the worst was breakfast.. Ugh.. I'm not a morning person at all.

    So, there's nothing wrong with it. For the people that do use it in the household, they probably didn't communicate much to begin with, so I could see it actully bringing families closer together.

  24. Wondering is sometimes better than asking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are u sure you need to ask /. people what they think about every little detail of your life ?

    Please just wonder if you feel you loose your 'personal time' or anything and take your decision accordingly. Why asking ?

    If you really want to put something on /., read a book and write a comment. ;)

  25. Ha ha ha by be-fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm AIM'ing my brother right now from my laptop. Its actually really nice, since if you see a cool website, you can just send a link, instead of running upstairs and showing it to him on his computer.

    What IM is really useful for, however, is keeping in touch with people long-distance. IM has a relaxed, conversational quality that you can't get from a phone call. With the phone, there is pressure to finish the call quickly, and it is something that you do on special occasions. With IM, you can just say hi, or share a random funny thought, without wasting anyone's time.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Ha ha ha by Radish03 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What IM is really useful for, however, is keeping in touch with people long-distance. IM has a relaxed, conversational quality that you can't get from a phone call. With the phone, there is pressure to finish the call quickly, and it is something that you do on special occasions. With IM, you can just say hi, or share a random funny thought, without wasting anyone's time.

      While I do agree with you about the phone, I've found that while away at college IM has become a sort of annoyance. It pretty much allows my parrents to keep tabs on me all the time. If I'm still up at 3 am and one of them happens online, "What are you doing up so late!?!" If I'm idle for a day because I spent the night at the girlfriend's place, "Where were you all day??? Did you really sleep in til 4pm?"
    2. Re:Ha ha ha by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      "What are you doing up so late!?!"

      Ignore them. There are many possible excuses, such as leaving your machine on at night for some random reason or by accident.

      If I'm idle for a day because I spent the night at the girlfriend's place, "Where were you all day??? Did you really sleep in til 4pm?"

      Oh, sorry. I was in the library studying.

      Of course, any parent who believes that one is a mug.

    3. Re:Ha ha ha by gangien · · Score: 1

      While I do agree with you about the phone, I've found that while away at college IM has become a sort of annoyance. It pretty much allows my parrents to keep tabs on me all the time. If I'm still up at 3 am and one of them happens online, "What are you doing up so late!?!" If I'm idle for a day because I spent the night at the girlfriend's place, "Where were you all day??? Did you really sleep in til 4pm?"

      Well you're obviously not enough of a nerd if your parents are interested enough in your life to keep tabs on you.

    4. Re:Ha ha ha by Seeka · · Score: 1

      I learned my lesson on this while I was still at home. I got tired of being bugged by my relatives and blocked almost all of them.

      If my parents want to talk to me while I'm at Uni, they use a phone. It makes it a lot easier. If you want your problem to go away, tell your parents that you changed your IM or something. Tell them somebody hacked into it, so if they log onto another screenname, they can't say "He's online!"

      Of course this would get trickier if your parents actually sent you fake IMs trying to figure out if it's still you there. Eliminate any font coloring, and make sure to not talk personal about yourself to strangers. If they think they've caught you though, inform them of the nature of what happened.. Some guy ran a XYZ attack on your ftp server that happened to have a link to your my documents and so the guy now knows everything about you. That should eliminate any other inquiries they have. They might think you're full of shit, but they'd have a hard time proving you wrong.

      Here's another thing though: Don't stay on the computer all the damn time. Of course she's going to assume that because you weren't ON THE COMPUTER at 4pm, that you weren't actually "there" ... Tell them you're out partying. If they have a problem with it, you've got even more work ahead of you than I can help with.

    5. Re:Ha ha ha by jrumney · · Score: 1
      If I'm idle for a day because I spent the night at the girlfriend's place, "Where were you all day??? Did you really sleep in til 4pm?"

      Just tell them you were at your girlfriends place fucking her senseless for 12 hours straight. They might realize after you tell them that it is time to let you grow up.

  26. Great technological advance for marital life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to the remote control features of windows XP, wireless networks and IM technology I can now see my wife play with herself on the bedroom webcam even when she's told me to sleep on the couch. Great stress relief and I don't have to fake I enjoy snuggling after sex. (I hope she doesn't read slashdot, she doesn't know I can remote control the bedroom computer.)

  27. Offtopic?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How is the parent poster offtopic?

    If you're going to moderate, read the damn instructions!

  28. i would take it in a heartbeat to replace . . . by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

    the constant screaming across the house where i grew up! :)

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  29. You insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I uninstalled Family 1.0.

  30. anything to end yelling up the stairs... by ethanms · · Score: 4, Interesting

    hearing the "BLAH BLAH BLAH!"... "WHAT?"... "BLAAHH BLLAAAHH BLAAAHHH!!"... "WHAT?"... thankfully it's just me and 1 other at home, so I only deal with that at the family's...

    I use it work to talk to people in the next cube over... because it cuts down on voice-noise at work, it allows me to be at my PC and doing other things while someone else's brain churns to come up with thoughts... It also offers some privacy against cube-snoopers who sit and listen to other people's conversations... of course IM is clear text so it's usually just idle jabber... anything more classified requires a trip to Chotchkie's for coffee

    1. Re:anything to end yelling up the stairs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you were modded +1 Sly Office Space Referrence? :-P

    2. Re:anything to end yelling up the stairs... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      if it helps, I can wriyte an add on that converts text to "BLAAH BLAAH BLAAH.."
      anything to help avoid the chores.

      I call it "Trade marked character teacher talk."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Your home is a cubicle cluster by fleener · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The family household is first, and foremost, the place you learn and strengthen your communication skills. I'm sure 10 years from now we'll know all the CONs of diverting most of our face-to-face communication to instant messaging. It will surely strain all form of communication, from retail customer service to inter-office discussions. We already bitch about working in cubicles. Now we want to make our childrens' rooms cubicles too? How utterly sad.

  32. Good way to stay in touch by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I use instant messaging with some of my extended family members. It's a great way of staying in touch. The only excuse for instant messaging someone in your own household, however, is if you do not possess muscle control over your legs. I mean, good god. Walk down the hallway and get a little excercise at least. That much laziness and your computer chair will give you bed sores.

    1. Re:Good way to stay in touch by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Thats why a proper geek has a chair with casters, or like my chair, full sized scooter wheels (100mm) that can make it through deep carpet.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Good way to stay in touch by headonfire · · Score: 1

      'round these parts we call them 'lazy pains' - when you've been sitting on your ass for so long it hurts.

      for example, i threw my back out the other day by not moving from the couch with the laptop on a chair in front of me for many, many hours.

      see also 'atrophy', and 'fucking lazy'.

      fuck it, i work 52 hours a week monday through friday, I should be able to veg out, right? But now even my couch is trying to kill me! no rest for the, uh, lazy, i guess..

  33. Real people! by BlndBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, enough is enough. I can't believe there are professionals in this world that think this is a GOOD thing. I regularly stop IM conversations with a phrase like - "Shouldn't this be a phone/face-to-face conversation?" The text medium simply leaves too much room for misunderstanding.

    Families need to learn to DEAL with eachother, and having your body language and voice inflection sheilded sure as hell isn't going to help.

    Kids these days. (I'm 22, and I get scared.)

    1. Re:Real people! by stealth.c · · Score: 1
      The text medium simply leaves too much room for misunderstanding.

      I agree IM's do not at present lend themselves to understanding, but I agree with previous posters here that text-mode communication lets you think about what you say first. This post has gone through at least two revisions before I ever hit Submit.

      The real problem is this maddening IM shorthand which has become so popular. There is no form or structure to most IM communications except a vague adherence to English syntax. I HATE getting IM's from my sister, as much as I'd like to hear from her, because her writing skills drop to nil within an instant messenger.

      "Kids these days" need to learn to write properly. Intra-family IMs could actually help this if parents reprimanded kids for incomprehensible messages. /wishfulthinking

      You're right: families do need to deal with each other. Yet I can think of scenarios where IM's might actually help--as long as those damn teenagers stop writing like first-graders.

    2. Re:Real people! by Unoti · · Score: 1

      It IS a good thing. I can chat with my family while they're at home and I'm at work. We can share articles, make plans, etc. We wouldn't be talking at all when I'm at work otherwise. And regarding stealth.c's comment, Mom and I do in fact encourage the kids to communicate thoughtfully, and ask them to restate when they say something incomprehensible. I can't believe there are professionals in this world that are so narrow minded and judgemental. Well, actually I can. I'll tell you what's way more out of control in the professional world than IM is in the family world: email chains that go on and on without phone or face-to-face conferences.

    3. Re:Real people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when people want to break up via IM because it's "easier", even though you pretty much live 5 minutes away from each other.

      I think I toss the IM thing soon. The benefits stop outweighting the drawbacks soon.

    4. Re:Real people! by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      I regularly stop IM conversations with a phrase like - "Shouldn't this be a phone/face-to-face conversation?" The text medium simply leaves too much room for misunderstanding.

      I'm just the opposite. Most conversations are too complex for me to explain things without using IM. So much stuff is missed on the phone and it gets annoying saying "What? Wait what was the last part?" every 3 minutes. With IM I can explain things in minutes that would take hours explaining over the phone.

      With IM I could leave a message to my sister like "Ok now click start->control panel, a window should come up and just double click administrative tools, then another window should come up, now open services and find Blah Bob, double click on it, find startup type and select manual, then click stop and ok." (yes I've had conversations like that many times when I was on vacation, I would just send her the message through AIM on my cell phone.)

      One simple IM with a series of instructions that would take 20 minutes to explain over the phone (you can't just read off instructions like that over the phone, you actually have to walk the person through it unless they have someone transcribing the phone call on their end, and it's really hard wasting all that time especially when you're in a foreign country and it's costing you $1 a minute just to talk)

      And you don't always have a persons full attention on the phone especially when that persons busy. I could be writing some software on my computer very excited and busy because I just had a great idea and I want to get it down before I forget it. If someone called me or tried to talk to me in my room they'd have hardly any of my attention and I'd have to keep stopping and thinking of what they're saying and form responses. With IM they can just send me a message and when I'm less busy I can read it and reply.

  34. Well by stuph · · Score: 1

    Girlfriend and I share an apartment, 2 bedrooms, 1 as an office.. generally we just IM each other random links, but if it's anything else, i'll go through the motions of actually turning around in my chair to talk to her...

    As far as families go, I can't imagine while growing up not being yelled at by my parents to tell me to "Get your ass out here, what in God's name did you do this time!?!?"

    --
    --Less Thinkin', More Drinkin'...
  35. Jabber by frohike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife and I use this because we have a basement that's separate from the upstairs of the house (you have to walk outside and back in). Her office is down there, mine is up here, so it's a bit of a pain to talk back and forth.

    We also had AIM reliability issues (and I dislike the unencrypted chatter going out and back in) so I set up Jabber on our server here. Works great -- even when the cable modem goes out it's still there. No one else snooping in on the conversations, etc. Also Gaim works with Jabber now (if somewhat buggily) so you don't need to switch clients or anything to add it.

    1. Re:Jabber by jbeall · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent - why use AIM when you could setup your own Jabber server? Also, for those of you that are security conscious (read: paranoid), it allows you to keep all your intranet communications from getting send through AOL servers.

    2. Re:Jabber by jargoone · · Score: 1

      I can understand the reliability issues, but what's the concern with the unencrypted chatter? Are you terrorists, or sharing trade secrets? Or having IM sex? Being security-minded is good, but unnecessary in this case.

    3. Re:Jabber by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure security is really only a secondary concern, but to be frank, would you send all your email to an arbitrarily-chosen corporation just to get it to a friend?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Jabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millions of people do it every day. Dumbass.

  36. Vast Mansions by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Are American houses so big that you can't shout to the other people in them ? I'm not sure the articles idea of a wicked sense of humour is quite the same as mine: "What do you want for tea ?" "A pizza and a beer mom." "What do you want for tea ?" "I dunno, my mate Hellbastard just brought round some sherbet, it was very nice but we've finished it all off now, can you get us more - bitch ?"

  37. Away Messages and Profiles by gabeman-o · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One reason that I don't talk to my family (other than my brother) on AIM is that I sometimes have things in my away messages and my profile that I don't necessarily want them to see. For example, I don't want them to read my away message saying that I'm at a party at 3am on a school night (the reason that they wouldn't know is that I go to school 3 hours and a few states away). I do, however, use iChat AV and my iSight to videoconference with my family.

  38. I used to use IM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a college student in the dorms it's easy to be at AIM all the time because you really can't get very far from it. When I got an apartment I made the decision to dump AIM because otherwise I'd be in my bedroom all the time.

    I don't spend so much time with the computer anymore, but I've found I never see my roommates unless I actually go into their rooms. They're ALWAYS on AIM and NEVER in the living room, kitchen, or other-room-we-don't-use. It's bizarre.

    It's actually making me sick thinking about it. Wasting away in front of a computer while pouring over trash websites and talking to people online you should be hanging out with instead of talking about doing something.

    1. Re:I used to use IM by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      So advise them to go hang out at the mall instead. That way they can waste away intellectually in a different manner.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  39. to everyone saying "just yell ..." by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you obviously don't have a baby. when you are in bed with sleeping baby next to you on the wireless laptop and wife is working in the home office, IM is a godsend.

    screaming=kid wakes up = your 20 minutes of private time today is over!

    1. Re:to everyone saying "just yell ..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... why is the baby sleeping on the wireless laptop?

    2. Re:to everyone saying "just yell ..." by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      Get a veo observer.. talk about a godsend.
      originally my wife flipped, now she'd sooner give up the car seat.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:to everyone saying "just yell ..." by fleener · · Score: 1

      Being in the bed with the baby is great -- if you're sleeping. I believe the rest of us handle your situation by placing the baby in a portable crib or rocker after we've gotten up and are going about our day.

      If we want to talk to the wife, we walk in the other room. The last thing parents with a newborn need is to spend lest face-to-face time. It puts more strain on an already stressed situation.

  40. No Downfalls?? by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've just been reading the past 30+ comments, and no one seems to think that this is a problem!!

    Sure, for the teen geeks out there who like a lil privacy (I don't mean like thaT.. well, maybe I guess I do) this is OK for. But for a family to be a family this sure does pose major problems?

    A poster a few messages up claimed his wife and him have nothing to talk about when they get home after talking all day. What about for the parent and child who would rather IM while around the house. Doesn't prolonged exposure to this make the child more unwilling to talk to his/her parent face-to-face about sex/drugs/abuse??

    I know I tried my damnedest to remain an reclusive troll around my house, but thankfully my parents were active in my life and always asked questions. Hindsight being what it is, I'm glad we came to a good balance between privacy and parenting! That sort of thing requires you to LOOK at your parents and FACE your problems/fears.. not hitting "Block" or "Exit".

    I know I have a point here, and I'm trying to find it.

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
    1. Re:No Downfalls?? by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be honest, if a kid's not willing to talk to his parents, that's not going to change much - better or worse because of IM. It's purely anecdotal, but speaking for myself, I know that I don't exactly have the best relationship with either of my parents and that IM wouldn't have changed that one way or another. I simply have no desire to really talk to them, IM or otherwise - it comes down to a matter of personality more so than it does medium.

      On the other hand, I'd say it's had a positive impact in other areas of my life. I do 'speak' with my siblings more than I would if simply left to my own devices, and keeping in touch with friends that are gone and in college elsewhere has made IM worth it for that alone. Instead of being forced to simply part with old friendships and move on, holding on only to one or two deemed 'important enough,' I've stayed in touch with most of my friends from high school. IE: They didn't just suddenly drop out of my life. I think this is really the greatest impact IM is going to have on the younger generation, such as myself, that's coming up now. I'd suspect that 10 years from now you'll have fewer cases of best friends who haven't talked in years simply because they lost touch - communication is becoming too easy now. Personally, I see that as a good thing.

    2. Re:No Downfalls?? by Slowping · · Score: 1


      What about for the parent and child who would rather IM while around the house. Doesn't prolonged exposure to this make the child more unwilling to talk to his/her parent face-to-face about sex/drugs/abuse??

      I know I tried my damnedest to remain an reclusive troll around my house, but thankfully my parents were active in my life and always asked questions. Hindsight being what it is, I'm glad we came to a good balance between privacy and parenting! That sort of thing requires you to LOOK at your parents and FACE your problems/fears.. not hitting "Block" or "Exit".


      Well Said.

      What's more sad is that this is the same group of people that complain about insufficient parental supervision for children that go postal and shoot others at school or play games inappropriate for their age.

      --
      (\(\
      (^.^)
      (")")
      *beware the cute-bunny virus
    3. Re:No Downfalls?? by yipyow · · Score: 1

      What about for the parent and child who would rather IM while around the house. Doesn't prolonged exposure to this make the child more unwilling to talk to his/her parent face-to-face about sex/drugs/abuse??
      I know I tried my damnedest to remain an reclusive troll around my house, but thankfully my parents were active in my life and always asked questions. Hindsight being what it is, I'm glad we came to a good balance between privacy and parenting! That sort of thing requires you to LOOK at your parents and FACE your problems/fears.. not hitting "Block" or "Exit".

      I think instant messaging actually helps in situations like these. It is easier to be open with people when using text messaging of some sort because people have more of a chance to think about their response and there is no pressure to answer immediately or look people in the eye. While I agree that eye contact is important and should not be avoided altogether, text messaging of some sort can be useful for certain conversations where one party can avoid some potential emarrassment. It's just that text is so much less threatening than spoken converation...

      Now is only there was a global, cross-platform way of doing secure instant messaging, it would be really useful. Right now there's no real security in instant messaging and anyone can sniff your conversations; who knows, AOL probably logs them all.
    4. Re:No Downfalls?? by Bishop · · Score: 1

      I know I tried my damnedest to remain an reclusive troll around my house, but thankfully my parents were active in my life and always asked questions.

      I think that is your point right there. It is a good one. Most teenagers will go to great lengths to exclude their parents from their life. Allowing this to happen is not good. Teenagers often need guidance from their parents. Teenagers need real human interaction to socialise properly. Allowing IM to replace face to face communication is a symptom of a larger social problem.

      IM/email has its place. Enabling people to communicate over long distances on a regular basis is a good thing. Using IM/email to send urls and other digital content is using the right tool for the job. Allowing family members to better ignore each other is simply not good.

    5. Re:No Downfalls?? by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest problem I'm seeing in this entire discussion is it's like... if people don't use IM then they must be a family that talks a lot and if you do use IM then you're a bunch of, as you say, reclusive trolls that never talk and are disfunctional in some way.

      We use IMing in my house but when my parents or siblings want to actually talk to me and they do and it works the same the other way. I find that overall, we have more communication. First, it cuts down on yelling when someone is needed elsewhere (assuming they're at their computer) and second it allows me to carry a slow response time conversation if I'm reading or working. It's also an easy way to send links which, when they're really funny or interesting will generally cause whoever received it to come in and talk about it (interesting) or laugh about it.

      I can't talk to my girlfriend on the phone and work on a programming project at the same time but I can with IMing. I honestly see this as a good thing. If IMing cuts into your family's communication in a negative way, odds are it wasn't that great to start with.

    6. Re:No Downfalls?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't talk on the phone and do your programming at the same time. But you can program and instant message at the same time. OK, so you have separate keyboards for each hand and your eyes function independently of each other. That's great for circus freaks, but the rest of us prefer using the phone.

  41. Sometimes this is the only way. by ByteHog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For example: me, my brother, my mom and my dad all live in different cities. We keep in touch via IM.

    --
    - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
    1. Re:Sometimes this is the only way. by lxs · · Score: 2, Funny

      me, my brother, my mom and my dad all live in different cities.

      Wow, your family must live in an enormous house.

  42. irony... by kevin+lyda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so families are using a new communication tool to, um, communicate, and people are asking if this is reducing communication within families?

    is im or email or irc or phone or letter or videophone or telegraph the same as talking face to face? no, they're all different. and none are best, certain circumstances lend themselves better to certain methods. some people find letters a better method of telling family members bad news. i like people to email me info like addresses, phone numbers or email addresses. irc is a nice supplement to conference calls as it lets taking minutes be distributed.

    but i supposed change always sees this. "oh no, it's different, it must be BAAAAD!"

    whatever.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:irony... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      You are missing the bigger picture. I don't think anyone would argue that using email, im, and irc for impersonal communication (addresses, url, meeting minutes) is necessarily bad. Although even in business a 2 minute chat in the hallway can get far more done then any amount of email. IM, irc, and email are also an excellent tool to communicate with friends and family who do not live near you. At issue here is text messages replacing face to face communication between family members living in the same house.

      Real face to face communication is very important for children (and teenagers) to socialize properly. Impersonal communication whether email, IM, or a written letter allow the communicators to ignore emotions. This is the reason some people prefer to use letters to convey bad news. However, ignoring emotions is usually not a good thing regardless of age. For teenagers in particular, who are still developing emotionally, ignoring tough emotions like sadness and anger is very bad. It is also far easier to lie through text then it is face to face. The NYT article puts a positive spin on interfamily text messageing ignoring years of counter research showing how important face to face communication is. To say: "the [instant] messages are helping to break down the interpersonal barriers that often prevent open communication." is missing the much bigger problem of way those barriers exist in the first place.

    2. Re:irony... by danielpavel · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the problem is the fact that these new mediums offer less information than face-to-face.

      When two people talk face to face, there's more going on than just words -- voice tonality, the way the hands move, eyes & face, general body posture, etc. And usually they are more effective at transmitting emotional content, rather than pure information. And as someone else said on this thread, at least for developing children, emotional content is very important.

      So, at least right now, IM and email are "dryer" than the conventional mediums (event on telephone, the voice can mean a lot). I guess on a videophone, it would be almost like talking face to face -- but it'll take a while for it to become as ubiquitous as voice-only cellphones.

      -silent

    3. Re:irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the bigger picture. I don't think anyone would argue that using email, im, and irc for impersonal communication (addresses, url, meeting minutes) is necessarily bad. Although even in business a 2 minute chat in the hallway can get far more done then any amount of email. IM, irc, and email are also an excellent tool to communicate with friends and family who do not live near you. At issue here is text messages replacing face to face communication between family members living in the same house.

      I think you have this backwards. I have found that im and email in 2 minutes can accomplish far more than several hours of meetings. For one thing, everyone gets to speak. For another, they can all speak at the same time without interrupting each other.

      Human face-to-face communication is good for emotional comversations between two people. But speech is far less efficient than any other form of communication for anything else.

    4. Re:irony... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      I stand by my statement: A 2 minute (not 3 hour) chat in the hall can accomplish far more then any minutes of email. This is not to say that email is not usefull. Email/IM is a very powerfull tool, but it is not a replacement for meeting in person.

      There is a saying that more business is done on the golf course than in the boardroom. There is a lot of truth in it. The quick chat in the hallway is the same thing. It is all about meeting people face to face, and developing business relationships.

  43. Back in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pre-IM, my roommate and I would exchange email... across our dorm room... while we were both sitting there.

  44. Another stray from family time by samdaone · · Score: 1

    American's, such as myself, have strayed away from the staple of the 50's and early 70's of having family time together. Where the family would gather around a radio or tv and listen together and discuss. When I grew up in the 80's and 90's there was no family dinner. We each grabbed our own plate and went our seperate ways.

    IM is just adding another barrier to interpersonal communcations within the family environment. Is everyone in the family so glues to their individual computers that no one talks to one another anymore even to just shoot the bruise? Will American's and other families become secluded that we occasionally need to glance at pictures of our immediate family to remember what they look like?

    I for one hope this changes and that family time can be a staple for all families. IM'ing inside a big home is not that much of a problem now just asking for dinner. But what happens when Mom and Dad need to do the mandatory "birds and the bees" talk will it be done by IM and video camera? Or will they just walk you through a Power Point presentation via IM and give you voice when you need to ask questions?

    --

    Make me your friend. All my friends get +1 modifier and I need friends :)

    1. Re:Another stray from family time by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Why is this a problem? Why does everyone make this instantaneous leap of logic, automatically assuming that solitude and lack of communication is a bad thing?

    2. Re:Another stray from family time by Frennzy · · Score: 1

      We rarely had dinner at the 'table', and I'm a child of the 70's/80's. I liked it that way. Honestly, I love my mom, but I really don't care to spend that much time with my family anyway. We don't share the same interests. We bore each other to tears...really the only thing we have in common is genetics...and fondness for the occasional glass of whiskey.

    3. Re:Another stray from family time by samdaone · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with you. I was the same way, but I somehow think that if we were together that we could have developed some sort of passing interest. As it stands now I just call my Mom occasionally to basically just say "Hi..Bye!". For some reason I am longing for more and I am automatically trying to figure out if it was the lack of family time we had when I was a child that somehow was a cause for this.

      --

      Make me your friend. All my friends get +1 modifier and I need friends :)

    4. Re:Another stray from family time by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps it's just me, or maybe 'the breakdown of society' as a whole, but I think most younger people are beggining to view the family unit in the tradional sense as less and less important. I don't argue that familial life is important for a person's development, especially early in life, but that perhaps the idea of a central 'family above all else' mentallity is becoming somewhat less central in the minds of younger people?

      We're fed this image of a 1950-60's Leave It To Beaver family, but honestly, that image of perfection has only been a reality in a minority of cases, even then. Given the fact that as the years have gone by, Americans have seemed more willing to shed the old way of doing things, I can't say I'm surprised that the old idea of what family is would be one of them.

      Speaking totally from personal experience, almost none of my friends have anything approaching a 50's model family. I've noticed that among most of the people I've grown up with, the emphasis tends to be on extra-familial bonds instead of the tradiontal, genetic family, and this is in the south - the bastion of traditional values. Is this a growing trend, or just a fluke of my hometown?

      (Note on hometown comment: I live in a city of approximately 200,000 people which also happens to sit right next to the largest military post in the world, so it is entirely possible that this is just weirdness in my town due to the constant movement of people in and out with the military, even though myself and my circle of friends do not come from military families. End rambling. :-P)

    5. Re:Another stray from family time by deprogram · · Score: 1

      No, I think you're approximately correct. I, for example, get close to zero face to face familial contact, and it's mostly by choice, and not because I don't have a family. The other factors you aren't mentioning are the breakdown of global barriers (as a citizen of the EU the ease at which I can travel through Europe amazes me) and a quickly leveling global professional playing field. My family is scattered over a large part of the world. Oh well.

      And, no, we don't IM. The spread of global packet networks has made communication vastly quicker, and cheaper, though. I'm not complaining.

      I'm fairly atypical, I think. The 'nuclear family' was always a fantasy, a dream of uniform niceness and cleanliness, invented by a post world war society infatuated with it's apparent wealth and progress, motivated by a combination of greed and religion.

      Personally, I think what we have now is better. If relationships are formed, they have the chance of being real relationships, unrestrained by barriers of convention. The widespread abandonment of the right-wing republican ideal of family doesn't bother me at all. :]

  45. IM me u2 by The+Llama+King · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We're a 2-parent, 2-kid family. Most of our computers are in one room, a kind of in-home NOC. Often all 4 of us are in this room, on the computers, and often all on IM. There we sit, our backs to each other, and sometimes rather than talk we'll all IM each other. We all admit it's pretty pathetic and pretty weird, but dammit, we like it that way.

    --
    C'mon, baby, kiss The King.
    1. Re:IM me u2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow....wow.

    2. Re:IM me u2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. So instead of hugging your family you send "wanna cyber?"

    3. Re:IM me u2 by disntrstd · · Score: 0

      Deprieving your children their own room with a PC is just evil. How else with they download and masturbate to pr0n?

    4. Re:IM me u2 by binary+paladin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not that bad. When I lived in my previous house we had a big downstairs room that I converted into a sort of office (although it was more of a game room). Not only did my siblings have their computers down there along with mine, butfour of my friends simply kept their computers hooked up at my place.

      At times... the room would be dead quiet and we were all having a conversation. I don't think I'd call it sad. My parents liked it! It's not that often you can have 7 teenagers in a room like that and still have it quiet enough to sleep at 4:00am.

      It is funny IMing someone in the same room though.

    5. Re:IM me u2 by welthqa · · Score: 1

      My wife and I often have our headphones on, so we can't hear each other talking. It works, but since we've got a 3 year old now, we can't both be on the computer at once so we don't do a lot of msging anymore. I did this with my brother and sister when I used to live at home, rather than go get things. It's nice to send a msg to your sister at the other end of the house, and have her appear a minute later with a coke and some cookies.

      --


      100% Pure Evil With The Look And Feel Of Wholesome Goodness
    6. Re:IM me u2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jebus... It's too bad there's no "Sad" moderation. No wonder Americans are afraid of everything and can't get along with others. Human beings are social animals. Even though technology can maintain a connection between people, it cannot substitute for physical interaction.

      Look, technology is great when it improves relationships. It's great to be able to send e-mail instead of snail mail or make LD phone call or have a LD video chat.

      When technology is used to separate us though, it just depresses me. People need to think about how they use technology and not just rush blindly at The Next Big Thing.

    7. Re:IM me u2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, I just waited til long after they went to bed, then snuck into the office, started up the computer, grabbed a few gifs and some of those new-fangled jpgs off of alt.binaries.pictures.erotica, loaded them into my DOS viewer, and whacked off. Worked just fine for me!

  46. ALL the time! by zippity8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try living in a student house with 8 or so people in it.

    Back in the day, we'd end up using IM more frequently than we'd actually go in and talk to each other. Not only was it more convenient, it also let us respond after studying, when we got home, or whatever. With the schedules so different, it was just easier than getting up, banging on the door, then going back and messaging them later on.

    But then again, the best way to get each other's attention was to crank up Quake....

  47. Ahhh older technology.... by twoslice · · Score: 5, Funny
    What ever happened to just screaming/yelling down a hallway?

    The old-fashioned wireless communications method - very nice!

    To the newer geeks: The above post is referring to the old wireless technology that utilized a unique QOS priority technique. Messages were encoded using higher and higher DB levels that really worked well - the louder the scream the faster people responded....

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

      This technology also transmits location information as metadata.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    2. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by gpoul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Though it was only a multiple-access medium. There was no carrier sense and no collision detection. Actually the message recipient had to request a retransmission. How ancient.

      Really not what we're used to today.

      Bow before me cause I'm CSMA/CD!

    3. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, those were the days! Back then, me and my SO even had oral sex (for those of you too young to know, this means yelling "Fuck you!" every time you happen to pass each other in the hallway). Nowadays, we just cyber.

    4. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by Mr+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The problem is that in the very young and the very old there is a major problem with packet dropping.

      I sniffed this very conversation over Christmas time while visiting family ( I removed the destination address for privacy concerns: )

      Mother: Dinner time, go wash up.
      Sibling in college: blank stare at computer screen
      Grandfather: continues watching tv
      Mother: DINNER TIME
      Sibling in college: blank stare at computer screen
      Grandfather: When is dinner?
      Mother is forced to use hardware extensions to alert grandfather and sibling through sequential pinging and alerts.

    5. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by NanoGator · · Score: 0

      "This technology also transmits location information as metadata. "

      Don't forget time of day!

      "It's 2am in the morning! STFU!!!"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Ahhh older technology.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...wtf

  48. Heh by RainbowSix · · Score: 1

    After one particularly late night of studying in college 3 years ago, my roomate, a friend, and I started cursing at each other over AIM in our tiny freshman dorm room. It was memorable as one of those "everything is funny because you're tired" nights.

    These days, AIM is useful in finding out if somebody is in their apartment before going down the hall to visit.

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    1. Re:Heh by rockmanac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Both Freshman and Sophomore years, my roomate listened to different music than I did, so we'd use headphones. AIM was essential, if he needed to ask me something without getting up 'cause I had the noise canceling kind (some really, really nice Sony ones that I use for doing my shift at Marquette Radio).

      -A

  49. I'd rather just use IRC anyway by mrpuffypants · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dad: What? You won't eat your vegetables?
    Kid: Nope. They're gross.
    Dad: (Goes to computer) +b #tvroom
    Kid: NOOOOOOOO!!!! BUT DAAAADDDDD!!!!

  50. let me get this right... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    you don't like osx, correct? you could have shown you're brother the software update option!

  51. Shout, shout... by ivern76 · · Score: 1

    Tears for Fears comes to mind...what happened to bellowing "MOM...WHAT'S FOR DINNER?" across the house?

    A lifelong geek, I still find the extremes some people go to insane.

  52. No Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't have a family, you insenstive clod!

    I think I'll IM myself to ask myself what I want for dinner.

  53. Home, no - work, yes by Cat_Byte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I worked at a .com during the boom and the entire company had ICQ installed. It was SO much better than playing phone tag. Hell if someone was on the phone you could pop-up msg them saying who was on the line wanting to talk to them. Or if I was on the phone I could still keep taking care of business via ICQ.
    For the home I think it's just silly or at the least, lazy. The only time I've ever used it room to room in the home was joking around. "It's 10pm. Do youk now what your son is doing behind your back?"

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    1. Re:Home, no - work, yes by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Not sure if it's still around but we used to use the corporate ICQ server, where you could run your own private server in house and that was VERY handy, plus not being on the "regular" icq network we didn't get spam and we didn't have employees hanging on chat with outside friends all the time either.

      At home I refuse to have the computers across the house, it's hard enough to get family time as it is without having junior huddled in his bedroom and me in the basement/etc so we put all the PC's in one room along with the TV and entertainment system, we call it the family room and it's where we spend most of our time, this way if my son is watching Nemo for the 113th time and I'm doing whatever on the PC we're still in the same room and I can also watch over my shoulder the TV and comment on his favorite parts.

      Once he gets old enough to go from Finding Nemo to something a little racier we'll put a PC in his room probably, teenagers do need some privacy but not a 3 year old.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    2. Re:Home, no - work, yes by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      I admire your constitution. I can hardly take one showing of Finding Nemo, let alone 113.

      Seriously... if you're not talking to each other, you're not talking to each other. Being two inches away from each other doesn't change that. This will effectively deter your children from accessing any forbidden material, but spoken from experience: an antisocial troll in the living room is still an antisocial troll.

      This, of course, applies mostly to teenagers. Your son shouldn't give you much trouble for a few years... but if he does turn into an antisocial troll, you'll have to do more than chase him out of his "cave" to get him to open up.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    3. Re:Home, no - work, yes by Grimster · · Score: 1

      I don't much care about forbidden material, nothing a parent does is gonna stop a teenage boy from pulling his pud, short of maybe cutting his arms off, so I have no delusions about stopping my kid from looking at dirty pics :) For now it's just an attempt to at least be in the same room as much as possible, plus all I have to do is move 3 feet over to the recliner and watch it with him while occasionally craning my neck to make sure no emails or pages are waiting on my screen.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  54. a step ahead - we use SIP phones by bajjeen · · Score: 1

    we use sip phones in my house to communicate. i hv a asterisk server and all my laptops and desktops hv SIP clients configured (MSN Msgr and SIP Phone). Also i hv couple of Hardware SIP phones. Calling others is just a matter of right click and place a call. :-) Also i hv hooked up my PSTN with asterisk. so when i get a land line call the call gets transfered to my all SIP phones (Laptops, desktops and hardware phones). if i am working on my laptop i just pick it up from my laptop. Its very cool. -B

    1. Re:a step ahead - we use SIP phones by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      More of a step sideways, but still pretty cool. :-)

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  55. IM in the house ? by nsebban · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, man I think my geek-o-meter just melt while I was reading this post. And I had to shut down my weird-o-meter to prevent it from melting as well.

    Well, I like IM, I use it every day with. But when I'm a few meters away from the person I'm chatting with, I discovered that opening my mouth to talk was much better. You should do the same, and you'll see that real-life communication with people (especially family) is a nice thing.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
  56. Treat it like you would at work... by mgrassi99 · · Score: 1

    Our big thing at work is email is great, but it pays to actually fly somewhere and talk to someone FTF as needed. You develop better interpersonal relationships, and you can better manage the people working on your project. Just like at home. You don't want to "parent" via IM, so yes, things like "dinner is ready" or "take the dog out" are probably fine, but you probably don't want to discuss family finances or Aunt Betty's latest breakdown over it.

  57. Re:Also fun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're an asshole and I cum in you

  58. how big is your house? by eske · · Score: 1

    Why don't you just go an talk to your wife/grilfriend/boyfriend/children?

    --
    What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion What rimes on recursion
  59. want personal time? by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    simple. disconnect. or use the "away" feature, saying so. whats so hard?

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  60. troll (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  61. Re:Also fun. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

    I honestly hope you're a troll. Really. Linux in no way whatsoever 'forces' you to learn about security any moreso than Windows or OSX. So he had an SSH service he evidently didn't need? This is different from a linux box running a loose SSH how? I'm not an Apple fanboy by any stretch of the imagination - I don't nor have I ever owned an Apple machine (but I also wouldn't turn one down), but you really need a reality check. OS X isn't perfect, but it's definitely one of the nicer OS's I've had a chance to play with. As far as 'speed' goes, who cares about raw computational power if the powerbook does what he needs? 99.999% don't need a 2GHz P4 - why force it upon them?

  62. I'll bite by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    So why did your little brother turn remote login on in the first place? I know that is was disabled by default in OS X 10.1 and it is in OS X 10.2.

    Apart from that, "safari goatse.cx" doesn't work at all. The best shot you have is the following: "/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari http://goatse.cx", which doesn't open http://goatse.cx.

    Shutdown won't work unless you sudo it. You knew his root password? Oh, yeah, well in that case he was screwed anyway. Giving a password to your asshole brother never helps.

    So, I doubt this little brother of you existed. Besides, are you proud now? He is probably runnning Windows XP with all it's security holes and is infected with more spyware by using Internet Explorer. Yes, you really did a good deed to the world....

    I'm not even a Mac fanboy, but you need to check your facts.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  63. Big houses are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, this is what happens when you take a family of four, put them in a 5000 sq ft house, and then give them all individual massive closets, bathrooms, play areas and so on. You get a break down in communication since it's too much damn work to go upstairs, find your relative, and ask them what they want for dinner.

    Add extra kitchenettes scattered about and the problem compounds itself.

  64. Choose your poison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BBWC - Bevel-Base WadCutter
    BT - Boat-Tailed
    CB - Cast Bullet
    DEWC - Double Ended WadCutter
    FMJ - Full Metal Jacket
    FP - Flat Point
    HBWC - Hollow-Base WadCutter
    HP - Hollow Point
    JHP - Jacketed Hollow Point
    JSP - Jacketed Soft Point
    LHP - Lead Hollow Point
    LRN - Lead, Round Nose
    LSWC - Lead Semi-WadCutter
    MC - Metal Cased
    MRWC - Mid-Range WadCutter
    PB - Lead Bullet
    PSP - Pointed Soft Point or Plated Soft Point
    RNL - Round Nosed Lead
    SJHP - Semi-Jacketed Hollow Point
    SJSP - Semi-Jacketed Soft Point
    SP - Soft Point or Spire Point
    SPTZ - Spitzer
    SWC - Semi-WadCutter
    TC - Truncated Cone
    TMJ - like _Totally_ Metal Jacketed, dude
    VLD - Very Low Drag
    WC - WadCutter

  65. Just how BIG is your house? by bender647 · · Score: 1

    This seems absurd to me, but then again, I think the current trend of buying 1000-sq foot per family member is also breaking down family communication.

  66. Communications by Yo+Grark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just as typing for 20+ years has KILLED my penmanship (Penpersonship?) using IM intra-family is the equivalance to emailing the guy in the cubicle next to you.

    It will lead to a break-down in communication.

    For example, growing up, I had 4 flights of stairs to travel to get to my main family's floor. I occupied the basement. I got tired of going up and down the stairs and decided to install an intercom. Even less reason to interact with my family I soon became the "hermit".

    Kids need to go outdoors, interact with PEOPLE not just for their own good, but for the good of the human race's future communicative skillz!

    Yes I know I put a z.

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Communications by GiMP · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with emailing the guy next to you? I always make people email me, even if I'm talking with them in real-life or on the phone. I won't remember things unless it is in my inbox.

    2. Re:Communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, "skills" isn't spelled with a Z.

    3. Re:Communications by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      How will a communication tool lead to a break down in communication.

      I'm also tired of the "you need to go outside and get some sunlight" line. I do. Just because I use a computer regularly doesn't mean I don't get out and do some working out. If anything, my computer became my work time (since that's how I make money) and it also took over any time I used to spend watching TV as a kid. So, instead of vegging out with no interaction, I have email and IM and other means of talking to people.

      I don't know about most of the people around here but just because you know what IM is doesn't mean you have a communications problem. I know a number of really shy people that are actually able to be more open and talk more as a result of IMs. And I'm not talking about internet strangers, I'm talking about friends and people I know what won't really have a serious conversation otherwise because talking scares them. Telling them to "get over it" (which I know someone will do) is just lame. They now have a means of expression that they're comfortable with.

      Embrace technology and use it as it should be used and stop the doomsday blabbing about communication. I mean if you really feel that way you should be outside getting some sun and talking to strangers in a coffee shop instead of giving me something to respond to on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Communications by WilliamsDA · · Score: 1

      Interesting point you make. Although I was never a master at cursive, I'm abysmal now.

      When you take the GRE exam, they make you write out a ten line statement with cursive, stating you won't reveal any questions, etc. For me, that was the absolute worst part of the test.

      800 quant, 800 verbal, 200 non-disclosure statement

      Damn.. so close to that dream school :)

    5. Re:Communications by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

      Embrace the technology?

      You do realize that people can never use technology for it's intended use right?

      No doomsday blabbing, just foresight based on heinsight.

      Oh and as for your reply to me on slashdot? Called Communication, and thank you.

      --
      Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  67. Decadent opulence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll



    If your house is too big to shout to your family members then, quite simply, your house is too big. In certain parts of the world, people live in huts and here we are worrying about using 21st century technology to help mommy tell little billy that dinner is ready... if he could only make it as far as the east wing. And for all those Bel Air mentalities out there, let me remind you that it is quite possible to live in comfort and show off your wealth to your heart's content without simultaneously showing off your ignorance.

    </rant>

  68. Loss Of Personal Time by Jubii · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can Slashdotters offer some personal experience, pro/con, with being instantly and constantly accessible to one's spouse and children? Does this tend to break down your 'personal time'?

    No more than having a cell phone on your hip when you go to the toilet:

    "Hello?! Uh... I'm busy... Doing... stuff. Nevermind that sound, what do you want!!?"

    Sheesh, that's the worst.

    --

    I planned on inserting something witty here but never got around to it.
  69. Problem: by Doomrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    kewlkid: okay baby i'm taking off ur pantz...
    gran1922: okay
    kewkid: fuck i thought you were melissa. sorry gran
    gran: dont stop...!

  70. Damn! by vrioux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoa, I wonder what it's gonna be in a few years... Instead of your citizen ID, your primary identification record will be your Microsoft Passport? Damn... I don't understand people. Do you like virtual sunsets or do you prefer being there. I am a network admin but the thing I cherish most in my life is nature itself. I do use IMs at work to answer short questions from collegues, but at home, I talk with my wife and children. We play games, we take a walk, we cook dinner together, we go on a car ride somewhere we never went, we dance to music, we wash the dog.. Damn what's boring you so much people? Have you seen it all already? I don't. Shssh...

  71. This isn't a healthy tendency... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Humans NEED other Humans in their environment, or else they may go insane. IM is no substitute for actually seeing (as in the physical world) of another person.

  72. My X-Wife by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 0

    I had this happend to me.. My Xwife, Bitch, would IM even though I'm sitting in the same room with her. It used to piss her off when I would answer her outloud instead of IM her back.... Bitch...

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:My X-Wife by CableModemSniper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      this is just begging for some clever pun invovling IRC, but what that pun is, I can't think of yet.

      --
      Why not fork?
  73. Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Shouldn't you be sleeping with your wife instead of playing video games? I know I have.

    1. Re:Priorities by asit+ler · · Score: 0

      (begin wide-eyed stare)
      Did it hurt?
      (end wide-eyed stare)

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    2. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If "video games" are a euphemism for "another woman" then its a very good thing he's taking IMs instead of seeing her face to face. You wouldn't want him to walk in on you two would you?

  74. Can you hear me now? by whovian · · Score: 1

    Images of that annoying Sprint guy kept coming to mind, but it's really very appropriate given the typical lack of ability of parent and teen to communicate with each other.

    This idea could be turned into a neat commercial wherein you see parent and child finally having a "dialog" without rolling their eyes behind each others backs.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  75. Well... by blixel · · Score: 1

    Can Slashdotters offer some personal experience, pro/con, with being instantly and constantly accessible to one's spouse and children? Does this tend to break down your 'personal time'?"

    IM me and I'll tell you.

  76. I love IM, and I hate it by agwis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is a typical day for me when I have to work at a client's office:

    wife> you'll never guess who called
    me> can it wait? I'm working here.
    wife> oh it'll just take a sec...
    wife> blah blah blah
    me> *insert random emoticons to make it appear that I am actually paying attention*
    wife> ok, so when will you be home?
    me> soon, I just got to finish this one last thing...which I will get done as soon as we quit talking.
    wife> ok bye

    * a couple of minutes pass *

    wife> guess what happened on *insert dumb soap opera here*

    and so on. Once I put her on my blocked list but she figured that out and really got pissed.

    I'm reading this topic with much interest and interested on how other people deal with IM. I like it and hate it at the same time!

    -Pat

    1. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
      wife> you'll never guess who called
      me> can it wait? I'm working here.
      wife> oh it'll just take a sec...
      This nothing that can't be cured by

      ntalk -o $WIFE | eliza | ntalk -i $WIFE

    2. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      Or...

      Me> Uhhh... sweety?
      Wife> Yes dear?
      Me> I'm working, so could you please shut the fuck up? Either that or we'll trade... you go to work every day and see if you can maintain a job while I annoy you from home and tell you about last night's football game.

      Of course and even easier solution is to just turn IM off during work (that helps) or when I used it during work I simply created another screen name for work that I gave to work people only.

    3. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by lightmanx5 · · Score: 1

      that's exactly what I did! ~JOSh-X

      --
      ~JOSh-X
    4. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by MartinB · · Score: 1

      If you think it's annoying over IM, just think how much worse it would be if she phoned you...

      Seriously though, what a lot of people are missing - or not spelling out - is that IM is great for (relatively) non-interrupting communication: the things that would be *really* tiresome if you had to be totally interrupted from whatever else you're trying to do to pay attention to.

      The "What's for dinner" conversation is a great example, as is pretty much any question starting with "When..?"

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

    5. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by bruthasj · · Score: 2, Funny

      Make sure you have that AI thingy installed, because she won't like it (esp. if her name is eliza or lisa) when she gets something unintended:

      bash: eliza: command not found

    6. Re:I love IM, and I hate it by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Hex edit and corrupt ur own install of it, have her come by
      the office and see that it is broke .

      If ya really need to use it, undo the hex edit, and say
      it just started working, LOL .

      It can also mysteriously stop working again too .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  77. IM to SMS by dethkultur · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I use this all the time with my girlfriend... MSN, AIM, and YIM all have SMS gateways to their IM networks. Personally, I like MSNs the best (doesn't require a seperate sign in from SMS if you tie it to your regular IM account.)

    Lots of pros, pretty much combines the pros of IM (instant, and already integrated with your buddy list) with SMS (can get it anywhere). No cons yet though I can see plenty if your SO is the kind that uses it as a new anger communication channel.

    The meal coordination stories are classics of course... I know a guy that used this to make a quick IM bot for his office, listing all local menus and allowing eeveryone in his office to vote for what they wanted to eat that day. Cool stuff. (yes, I am the author of the project)

  78. Get off the keyboard and walk into Junior's room.. by mojotooth · · Score: 4, Funny

    If for no other reason than you might catch him doing something he's not supposed to be doing. I know that, as a child, I was terrified of doing something I wasn't supposed to be doing because my mom/dad could wander into my room at any moment.

    As if the threat of going blind wasn't enough... ;)

    --
    -- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
  79. Chiming in... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    The implication seems to be that it's yet another way families are disconnecting. I agree somewhat, that "facetime" between family members is a bit lacking these days.
    However, there are other reasons, non-technological that are at fault - two income, multi-job families, and an increased use of nannies/babysitters and other caregivers taking the place of parents.
    I'd rather see a family that communicates all day via cell phone, email and IM, but actually has dinner together fairly often, with a good amount of in-person family interaction, than a situation in which one parent is ensconced in a loft office doing paperwork until 10:00 PM, while the other spouse is at the office for yet another late meeting, or is away on a business trip all the time.

  80. Why use those when you have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NET SEND at your fingertips?

    Or with win9x, winpopup?

  81. What's 'personal time'? by gkuz · · Score: 0

    I have a wife, three kids, three cats and a dog. What is this 'personal time' concept?

  82. I use IM to talk to my roommates. by Slayk · · Score: 1

    It's not a bad way to give someone a heads-up when there's food or you need a favor. I would imagine with real family members, I would find myself signing off of IM more often than not, or just having an additional screen name just for when the 'rents were breathing down my neck.

    My $.02

  83. Even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't everyone wear pagers while in the house so that they can get those urgent messages in the event that they are away from the computer? Or even better, everyone in the household should wear a GPS tranceiver so that your location in the house is known. Personally, how many people live in a house so big that you can't either yell or walk over? And if you do live in such a huge house, wouldn't you just use an intercomm?

  84. Hmm by rendelven · · Score: 1

    I use various messengers to talk to my family around my house. No, I'm not lazy. It just seems stupid to get up and go walk across the house for a simple question that can be done in a few seconds. (There are 4 computers in this house, 2 in the same room.) I also use it to keep in touch with friends and distant relatives. :)

    --
    R.
  85. Why is this modded funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is crazy. In college we had more fun yelling down the halls at each other when we fragged someone...why IM when you can tell the rest of the floor who your bitch was right after you wasted his sorry ass?

  86. Cordless Phones by tonywestonuk · · Score: 1

    We have a DECT phone in each room - If I want to ask my other half somthin, I just phone her! - two key presses on the phone handset, is much easier than spending a good 20 seconds activating IM, and sending her a message (assuming that she even has her PC on at that time)!

    Tony.

    1. Re:Cordless Phones by Loosewire · · Score: 1

      salute to DECT phones, Theyrrree GREAT

      --
      Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  87. The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Googol · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I asked my daughter why she preferred IM to the old teenage standby -- hours on the phone. The answer surprised me. She could see who was online.

    From her perspective it solved two problems

    1. You knew in advance who was available to talk (lowered chance of rejection).

    2. It avoided the unpleasant experience of having to mediate access through a parent ("he's not in", "he can't come to the phone", "he's been grounded and can't talk"). This is actually a variant of #1.

    So it's all about saving face and managing rejection. IM provides lots of strategies and aids to do just that.

    Given that it solves or mitigates two teenage problems (potential rejection by absence or parent, and parental control), I predict the first cellphone company to implement a usable buddy list wins.

    1. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Squidgee · · Score: 1

      Another bonus to IM: you can talk to more people than you can on the phone. I know I prefer it for that reason alone. :)

    2. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      Having watched a friends family.. there is another one you missed..
      multi-chatting.. I've seen a 15 yr'old alt-tab through 9 windows and keep up with as many conversations.. all aim windows.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its also easier for her to be a goddamn slut.

    4. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You knew in advance who was available to talk (lowered chance of rejection).

      That's exactly why I don't use instant messengers. I can't control who gets the message: "I'm available to talk with you". If someone just spent an hour annoying me, I probably don't want to chat with that person, but I might not mind someone else starting a chat with me. Yet, instant messenger clients don't allow you to choose who you're willing to talk to without the ignored knowing that you're ignoring them.

      Saving face and managing rejection with instant messengers isn't that easy yet.

    5. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Learning to deal with unpleasant experiences is part of growing up. We're creating a generation of anxious kids with no social skills here.

    6. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like that, don't you? Go on, you know you want her.

    7. Re:The Killer App ... a Buddy List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I asked my daughter why she preferred IM to the old teenage standby -- hours on the phone. The answer surprised me. She could see who was online.

      From her perspective it solved two problems

      1. You knew in advance who was available to talk (lowered chance of rejection).

      2. It avoided the unpleasant experience of having to mediate access through a parent ("he's not in", "he can't come to the phone", "he's been grounded and can't talk"). This is actually a variant of #1.

      So it's all about saving face and managing rejection. IM provides lots of strategies and aids to do just that.

      Given that it solves or mitigates two teenage problems (potential rejection by absence or parent, and parental control), I predict the first cellphone company to implement a usable buddy list wins.


      Seeing who's available is pretty important, plus the ability to multitask. It's a bit complicated to get 3-way phone conversation's going, but on IM you can have multiple windows open and chat away. Lot easier than sitting with the phone and wondering who's available to yak with.

      IMs also offer another interesting thing, away messages and profiles. Unique away messages keeps tabs on what your friends are doing. Plus, profiles usually has some bit of news that you want to spread around, or links to sites you want your friends to check out. Lots of information passing around within seconds and without even saying 'hello'.

  88. It's like anything else... Balance. by xanthan · · Score: 1

    My wife and I IM all the time, even when we're 10 feet away. Within the house, IM messages tend to be "check out this link" or "hey, it's dinner time." Real conversations don't happen over IM within the house for the very reason several folks pointed out -- it's silly and it isn't a real conversation.

    An amusing side effect is that it becomes possible to improve your writing and typing skills with IM so long as both parties don't tolerate IM shorthand. i.e., no "u" or "ur" crap. A friend of mine recently learned about the wonders of IM when his fiance worked across the country for a few months. His typing skills really improved as did his written english. IM actually forced him to become an effective communicator. Granted, it's rare for that to happen, but it can if everyone chatting doesn't tolerate broken english. =)

    Bottom-line -- IM isn't a substitute for conversation and when I have kids they won't be allowed to get away with not talking, but it does have a place and it can be useful.

    Balance.

    -Steve

  89. Agrred...its bullshit by iron_weasel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    And what if you don't spend every waking moment tied to you PC? What if you actually went outside and did something else for a change? Like maybe in a garden or got a real life where you didn't sit surfing trash all day?

    I use computers in my work. Have every since they were invented. That means I am not on them continously ESPECIALLY if I got home from doing the same damn thing at work.

    What the hell is it with you people?
    Get a fscking pet and quite stroking your desktop.

    1. Re:Agrred...its bullshit by Nick_dm · · Score: 1

      "News for nerds". Doesn't comming onto a geek news site and complaining about people who always use their computer seem rather silly to you? Do you go up to sports fans and tell them to stop talking/thinking about their team all the time after all "it's only a game" so shouldn't they go do something productive?

      Sure its possible to overdo IM and I think its generally advisable to try and keep some real life contact going with friends and family, especially if young kids are involved (though if someone who is older and childless doesn't like that then its cool with me, not my job to tell them how to live their life). However IMing can be pretty usefull and if you live in a big house then it might be pretty practical. I've never had much need to at home (though when I'm at university its a different story of course) but for example my brother lives on the opposite side of the house to me, we both have PCs in our rooms, if its just a quick questions then why bother going there? I see plenty of him anyway.

    2. Re:Agrred...its bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been trolled. Have a nice day.

  90. This will sound retarded... by Timmeh · · Score: 1

    ...to any normal person, but my relationship was my brother has only went UP since we've started IMing each other. I'm in college now (still living at home) and since we're not both going to the same high school we don't know some of the same people, or hang out as much as we used to. I've got my computer in my room and he's constantly on the computer in the living room and though a lot of time it's just idle chit chat, or passing links or questions about when dinner is, etc.; it's given us a link that we didn't have for a while. I'd be at school all day and return dead tired and plop down in front of the computer, at least now we'll chat instead of before we would IM and I could go weeks without having any sort of conversation with him.

    IMs with him will actually end up provoking real life conversations, and we get to find out we have a lot more in common than we had previously thought.

  91. Downsides...? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Downsides? Can't think of any.

    The MAJOR upside is you can turn it OFF - I think that outweighs any possible "downsides" when dealing with one's family..!

  92. The times, they are a changin' by NtroP · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have a rather large house (2 story, 6 bedroom, 4 bathrooms) and it is neither practical, nor possible to yell (12" walls are pretty good sound proofing and my wife works nights and is asleep during the day). We have a wireless network and each family member has their own computer with IM installed, but IM can't wake them up or get them from the other room and sometimes they actually (gasp) have their computers off. Instead we have a 6-set wireless phone system and each person has an id that can be paged. This works well for calling people for dinner or waking them up for school.

    It does seem strange though especially to visitors. My mother-in-law spent Christmas with us for the first time and seemd to have a bit of difficulty accepting the "impersonalness" of paging your kids. I felt funny about it too until I realized that I actaully communicate with them MORE than if I had to get my lazy ass up, walk all the way across the house, down the stairs and to their bedrooms to ask them a quick question. Besides, I'm generally calling them to come to me (for dinner or to talk face-to-face) so by paging them it actually see them sooner.

    I think it is the sign of the times. When new technologies come out there are the early adopters who try to use it in every way imaginable - they "work out the bugs". If the use is truly usefull it will survive. If not it will decline, eventually settling into an equilibrium between "coolness" and effectiveness. for my personal situation IM is NOT effective so it was replaced with slightly older (paging) technology.

    We recently got the last of my extended family off windows (and on to OS X) which gave us all the ability to use iChatAV. At first it was cool and new, but then it became a pain. Just because my "buddy list" claimed my sister was on didn't mean she was - it usually was one of her kids or she was outside and she'd see a stack of connections when she'd get back in. Thinking it was important she'd try to IM me only to find me not at my computer so she'd call me long distance only to find out I didn't really have much to say except "Hi".

    Half the time I had my iChat activated I was actually "in-and-out" of the room and when I got a call I had to stay by the computer to talk and I was unproductive. So I started setting my iChat to offline or busy and eventually just turned it off when I didn't want to be interrupted. Pretty soon everyone started doing that. I have iChat on right now and NO ONE ELSE IS THERE - not even my kids - and I know they are online because my cablemodem's blinkenlights are going nuts and I'm just typing this.

    I think every generation will use new technology in such a way that will dismay the older generation. Heck, I recall reading that blackboards were hailed as the worst thing possible for schools (because students would be looking at it instead of the teacher) when they first came out. Technology changes much and society will change with it. I have to admit that with my wife working nights the kids and I, more often than not, have dinner together around the "magic-expando" coffe table in front of the TV than around our dining room table. My mother would have a fit! All our meals were around a formal table when I was a kid.

    Change is the only constant in the universe. And when things change too far in one direction the pendulum always swings back. I NEVER write snail mail any more - but I communicate with my parents (they live in southern Mexico, I live in Alaska) way more now via email than I ever did by snail mail. At first, my mother missed the "hand-written" letters, but now much prefers the quick reliability of email.

    There may come a day when students sit at home in front of a "hollow-teacher" instead of in a classroom and people will lament the loss of social interaction. But I know one thing: If physical contact is truly important to human developement we will get it one way or another. If not, our society will evolve into one where socialization will occure "virtuall

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  93. Old News by ilsa · · Score: 1

    About a decade ago, back when we were poor student and sucky job having types, we used IRC as a means of communicating when one of us was out of town. It was cheaper than long distance at the time.

    We still IRC some, because we have friends there. And we do use AIM around the house, mainly for slinging urls back and forth.

    Yes, we actually speak to one another too.

    --
    -- I Am Not A Terrorist.
  94. Occasionally by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We occasionally use AIM here for things like that; everyone here has their own computer (or three in my case: gotta have the Linux desktop, Windows laptop, and a caching DNS server since your ISP's sucks) and at least one screenname (or 20+ if you're really pathetic... *cough*) on AIM.

    What happens more often is that someone'll call me on my cell phone from the cordless phone in the kitchen to let me know it's dinner, since there isn't a computer it in the kitchen. Yet. (We're due for a cell phone upgrade, really. Maybe it's time for phones with AIM.)

    I never realized until now how pathetic I am... I should e-mail a memo to my family suggesting that we occasionally talk to each other in person.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  95. What's for dinner? by bigberk · · Score: 1

    Since the whole family's spending the day sitting on their fat asses, don't we already know the answer?

    McDonalds

    Seriously though, get off your duff and talk face to face. If the kids are being lazy about coming downstairs, make them come down.

  96. Only way. by WolF-g · · Score: 0

    My wife recently got hooked on http://science.slashdot.org. Trying to call her is useless, she doens't hear it, so I have to IM her. It's the only thing that will get her attention even though her desk is only 6 feet from mine.

  97. It's called VoA by weston · · Score: 1

    ...Voice Over Air. The problem is that it's encumbered by patents related to an intermediate mechanism that's part of telephone, intercome, and remote radio communication.

    A friend of mine, though, is working for a company which is working on a technology where you fill a building with another breathable fluid and use that as a mechanical transmission medium stimulated by human vocal cords, and I believe they're looking at a flat one time purchase fee for purchase of the fluid, rather than licensing costs.

    1. Re:It's called VoA by PacoTaco · · Score: 1

      Voice over Hot Air must be open source. Everyone around here seems to use it.

  98. Reminds me of that J.G. Ballard short story... by MHV · · Score: 1

    "The Intensive Care Unit" in which a man is living his entire life through television channels, never has any physical contact with the rest of the world, and when he finally meets his wife and children (whom he had by artificial insemination of his wife), they blow out and tear each other to pieces. Of course this is practically impossible, but it's a neat take on the sensory deprivation you get from not interacting enough with your physical friends. I see more the use of IM in cases where it can't be easily replaced (baby is sleeping, physical distance, or the need to pass an URL), but otherwise you should raise your ass from the chair.

  99. I've done this on rare occasions.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Generally, I agree that it borders on silly/worthless to "IM" each other when you're both in the same house.

    I've had a few exceptions to the rule, though. For example, a couple times I've been sick and pretty much lost my voice. If I was in the basement and my wife was upstairs, it was nice to be able to get and easily respond to simple messages, like "I've almost got dinner ready." or "Can you come upstairs for a minute and help me with...." It really sucks trying to yell back to someone when you have a sore throat.

    I've also used it as a way to "multitask" communications while I'm talking on the phone to someone. Instead of having to put the person on hold or interrupt the converstion, I can type in the background.

  100. Why is the baby sleeping on the laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To keep him/her warm, of course.

  101. Old News! by Another+Mac+Guy · · Score: 1

    Text messaging? That's old stuff. We have video conferencing between everyone in the house. Room to room. iChat and iSight. Great combination. Can't beat it.

  102. Isaac Asimov by tacocat · · Score: 1

    IMHO, Isaac Asimov already explored this kind of social interaction in the Robot Series of novels. The two main characters are Elijah Baley and his partner R. Daneel Oliva, who are both detectives in the series.

    Of particular importance is the world of Solaria where the society had evolved to such a point that any direct human contact was avoided as much as possible and people rarely met in person.

    My copy shows a print date of 1983. So that puts The Robot Series well before the Internet was routinely available. However, there are some significant implications that he seems to have identified rather well in this series.

    By the way, the entire human population of Solaria died off and no one was left except for one robot. It's an interesting story. I do hope that AIM isn't the beginning of this here on Earth.

    1. Re:Isaac Asimov by porges · · Score: 1

      Robots of Dawn, the third Bailey/Olivaw book, is early 1980s, but The Naked Sun, which first explores Solaria in detail, is from the 1950s.

    2. Re:Isaac Asimov by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize it went that far back!

      But I read this series about a year ago and was strongly impressed with many of his descriptions of cities and society. There are many parallels that are still being found and developed today.

  103. changes the nature of things by gotw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a funny thing. It seems a little easier to be frank with someone, or ask a hard question over IM. Maybe it's because you can't see the other parties face. Whether the impact is positive or negative I don't know, having a blazing row with someone because of that frankness is not nessecarily bad, getting it out in the open to be dealt with rather than letting issues simmer for ages.
    Inter household IM could have a really big effect on the way families communicate.

  104. Mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How is the parent supposed to be funny?

    More like disgusting.

  105. more communication, not less by mrv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My husband and I often work long or odd hours, or other committments will have us coming and going, but we usually have access to a computer while at work, besides what we have at home.

    It's very easy to chat about the day (vent frustrations, really, or the question of what's for dinner and who's picking it up, etc.) while it is happening or we have a free moment. There are days that if we see each other, one of us might be sleeping, so we may not get to chat at home for a few days in a row, but through email and IM we can still communicate ("don't wait up for me" - "dinner is on your own", etc.)

    If it weren't for IM, I'd fear that we wouldn't get to talk very often or know what's going on in each other's lives. But since we're usually both wired, we can still communicate even when we're not in the same physical place.

    --
    -mrv
  106. It was in a movie once... by hexfortyfive · · Score: 0

    I think the movie was Honey I Shrunk The Kids. For everyone looking for downfalls, I think this one is pretty obvious.

  107. Slashdot's misogynists strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  108. Telecommuter's blues by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    I was initially very happy when I became a telecommuter - I have a nice house in the suburbs, entirely covered by wireless network, so I can read slashdot even in my bathroom. However, I am also a father of three and to most of my family my work hours are also leisure hours - since daddy is at home, why not go to his room and tell him what a good Dexter's Laboratory episode he just has missed on the Cartoon Network? Soon I discovered I need some way to mentally separate myself from my family just during the work hours - and working with headphones turned out to be the best solution. My family still needs to contact me sometime during my work, but the popping iChat windows with questions like "dad, can I play on PS2 now?" or "honey, what do you think of salmon for dinner?" don't distract me. So yes, we do use IM to chat with each other even when all of us are at home - and I see nothing wrong in that. After 5PM I take off the headphones and I can say the proverbial "honey, I'm home".

  109. Arguing is much more pleasant with IMs by Cow007 · · Score: 1

    I think interfamily instant messaging is great especially for arguing with loved ones or best friends. It involves no yelling and reduces the emotions involved. I often use instant messages to argue with someone in the same room! The other benifit to arguing over an instant mesaging is that the argument isn't about who can yell the loudest or make the nastiest face, what you have to say actually counts and the other person cannot just simply talk over you or finish your sentinces to include passive agressive things. I LOVE IT IT MAKES MY RELATIONSHIPS SO MUCH EASIER WHEN I DON"T HAVE TO HAVE AN ARGUMENT FACE TO FACE! I would much rather duke it out on an even playing field in cyberspace. And for all you women out there just log the chat for easy reference. You said that you don't love me, check the damn logs!

    --
    411 Y0UR 8453 4R3 8310NG 70 U5!! -NSA
  110. Parenting in the Digital Age by Uggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    True Story

    With technology has come a multitude of conveniences, time savers, and capabilities of which our primitive ancestors could never have conceived. Take for example, the instant message. It is instantaneous, travels at the speed of light to its intended recipient, delivering important potentially critical information at the click of a button. It can be sent across the world, around the block, or to the next room.

    Laura at 15:01:18: Jaimito is poopie

    Jim at 15:01:43: Roger, I'll change him.

    Toxic waste disposal emergencies such as the one above could have not been addressed with such efficiency before the days of IM. Thank the Lord!

    --
    Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
  111. Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by soloport · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My spouse and I share an office. We sit across from each other. We can each look to the left of our monitors and see the other's face -- no yelling required (especially after putting the Athlon with jet-engine-like fan in the next room; door shut).

    We still IM each other, every day. Why? Because we read a lot of web information and it's just so convenient to post a link to the other about our findings.

    Or when a family member IMs one of us, it's easy to just copy the Jabber log out of gaim and paste it into the other's message window and share a conversation.

    Or when a client IMs one of us, we can let the other in on the question or panic-stricken demand for help and colaborate on a course of action.

    That's why!

    1. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I pity the world if you become the norm. How pathetically sad.

    2. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by E_elven · · Score: 1

      So you basically create a website with perhaps a little form (fed to a PHP script for XML storage so it can be referred back to) to pick out food and paste this into the IM? Text has its uses; mundane family communication is not one of them.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    3. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      (especially after putting the Athlon with jet-engine-like fan in the next room; door shut)

      I might be able to help you with that.

    4. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by soloport · · Score: 1

      I pity the world if you become the norm. How pathetically sad.

      Yeah, 'cause we normalites will just keep:
      * Flying instead of taking the hose-and-buggy, cross country
      * Using word-processors instead of painting pictures on cave walls
      * Keep using the darn faucet instead of drinking right out of the watering hole

      Real pathetic, indeed. There's nothing more pathetic than taking advantage of every available shortcut to save time for better things.

    5. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by thparker · · Score: 1
      My spouse and I share an office. We sit across from each other....

      We still IM each other, every day. Why?

      .... Or when a family member IMs one of us, it's easy to just copy the Jabber log out of gaim and paste it into the other's message window and share a conversation.

      This is not sharing a conversation. This is forwarding a message. Hopefully you'll understand this at some point, then you and your family can really share a conversation. Good luck.

    6. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      For whatever it's worth, I'm pretty much the same. We sit 6-10 feet away from each other, we talk outloud and via IM, depending on what we're talking about, what we're listening to (music, phone calls, etc), and/or topic.

      There are somethings that are faster to type, there are some that are faster to speak, it all depends on the question, and the context.

      That being said, we do IM back and forth with the kids, their computer room is across the house, that one is to save yelling.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    7. Re:Uh, because we're such a web-enabled family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cried when mailboxes were put up and I didn't have to travel several days on horseback to communicate with people.

  112. Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death..... by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only problem I see with this sudden increase in instant communication is the eventual rise of linguistic entropy. Have you ever read an old collection of letters? I remember being impressed at some of the letters foot soldiers in the Civil War wrote to their families. Even moderately educated people seemed to write very well. I'm sure I sound like an old fogey, and that's okay. I also understand that language is an evolving thing. However, I think we are slowly degrading our language much in the same way instant mass media has eroded our art.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  113. At work, I've IM'd the person *sitting next to me* by David+McBride · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it's not stupid, and it's actually helpful.

    When we're both concentrating on whatever project that we're cooperating on, being able to send messages asynchronously to each other is fantastic as we can send replies to each other when we've finished a section of work.

    Think of it as computer-assisted cooperative multitasking. :)

  114. Reverse by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use it when I need to get through to my daughter from work. Typical teenager, she has a phone glued to one ear and her KB stuck on AIM. So I IM her and tell her to hang up, I (or her Mom) needs to talk to her.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  115. My kids are grown, but... by annielaurie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't imagine anything worse than that kind of "Instant access."

    I work at home and am online most of the time, but I use my IM particularly to stay in touch with a group of people who belong to the same Yahoo Group and who share a mutual interest in writing. It's the perfect gathering spot; when you fire up your YM, people in the group know you're "at home" as the old-fashioned term once ran, and ready to receive visitors. We use it to hold a weekly hour-long conference, too--sometimes inviting "guest speakers." Works quite well.

    My spouse, kids, and Aged Parent can get me in a million different ways--there's the phone, e-mail, or a simple HEY, MA yelled upstairs. I prefer to keep the messaging to a civilized minimum and to have it on my own terms.

    --
    DUCT TAPE: The Election Supervisors' Secret Weapon
  116. Actually... by twoslice · · Score: 4, Funny
    There was no carrier sense and no collision detection.

    It was called collision avoidance. When your old man was communicating you avoided interrupting him otherwise there would have been a collision between you and him...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  117. Judgemental Posts by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 5, Informative

    So far, I've seen over a dozen posts suggesting that me chatting with my teenage sons are: an example of the breakdown of the modern family, an indication that we're a bunch of lazy geeks, or a sign that we need to go out and socialize. It's interesting to see these judgements, as they all assume that you know me or my family.

    Yes, my oldest son and I IM each other when we're in the same house. We have even IM'd each other when in the same room. Typically, we both had parallel conversations going on with other people online, and also were talking "face to face" along with the IMs. Oddly enough, many of the posters in this thread don't seem to realize that some things are simply more funny when written than when spoken, and if both parties are reasonably good typists, the conversations can flow quite freely.

    Also, there are some conversations that are awkward or uncomfortable to have in person. One of the reasons that lonely people use IM to establish new relationships is because of the comfort and anonymity of the medium. This can also be beneficial to people who know each other well, if there's an awkward subject that you want to discuss.

    Recently, my son and I were discussing an article on the NY Times (I'm one of those weirdos who doesn't mind that they know I read their articles) about teenage sexuality, and the incidence of intercourse falling in the past couple of years. Now, this would be a bit of an odd conversation to have with your dad at any point, but especially when you're a teenage boy, currently in a dating relationship. Because of the medium, I was able to cast my question in a non-threatening way, and he was able to compose his response without me watching his expression, or second-guessing his body language.

    Last but not least, I correct his grammar and spelling, and encourage him to learn to express himself with the written word. IM seems to be as good a place for immediate feedback and correction as any.

    In short, before you assume that families chatting is another sign of impending doom, please be a bit more informed.

    Tim

    P.S. WRT us being a bunch of lazy geeks, he's 15, playing JV & Varsity basketball and football, and we regularly compare weightlifting routines. He regularly challenges me (typically by throwing a cross-body block in the kitchen), and is looking forward to the day (not far off) when he can "take dad down." Unfortunately for my wife, he weighs 190 lbs, and I weigh 230, so when we wrestle, things usually get broken. I'm no stud, but it's not like we sit around on our butts all day in front of the PC.

    1. Re:Judgemental Posts by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      Because of the medium, I was able to cast my question in a non-threatening way, and he was able to compose his response without me watching his expression, or second-guessing his body language.

      There is nothing wrong with being scared... nothing wrong with mustering up some courage to say something important to someone to their face. There is nothing wrong with being a little bit paranoid, being angry, being judgemental. Its natural. Its natural for things to be hard and uncomfortable. But when you take away the inconveniences because you don't like them... thats just running away. You become weak. Life becomes too goddamn easy. You can talk to your son about anything in front of him and he can say anything in front of you... You just need to have some strength and courage. When did those things become obsolete?

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    2. Re:Judgemental Posts by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 2

      Who suggested that either of us was scared? Haven't you ever had a conversation where you were sitting next to someone, or walking down the street, where the position allowed you to say things out loud, and not have them stare directly at you?

      In my experience, there are many conversations in life that simply wouldn't occur if I forced everyone around me to "muster up the courage" to tell me this or that, eyeball to eyeball. A friend from college probably wouldn't have told me that she was sexually abused as a child, and my best friend from childhood probably wouldn't have confided in me some of the recent marital difficulties he's faced. In contrast, I most certainly looked this same buddy in the eye to tell him that his father had just died moments before he arrived at the hospital.

      One of the most memorable conversations my mom had with me was delivered in just this manner, as I lay in bed, pretending to be asleep. She simply stared at the blank wall, began talking, sharing with me things that she felt needed to be said, and then got up and left. Had she said the same words to my face a few mintues before, when I'd come home from partying with my teenage buddies, I'd have blown it off, and never heard a thing. Instead, I can almost recite what she told me, word for word.

      Staring into someone's eyes can be beneficial, but it can also halt the flow of information dead in its tracks. If using IM's around the house to occasionally trade some information with my son allows the information to keep flowing, then I'm all for it, and will use it. However, to your point, I have no intention of using IM as a substitute for looking him in the eye when I have something difficult or uncomfortable to say that would be better delivered in person.

      Tim

    3. Re:Judgemental Posts by jswatz · · Score: 1

      I'm the reporter who wrote the story. I realize that people might think it's silly or lazy to use IM instead of banging around the house, but it does creep up on you. And what interested me the most was the fact that people are using it in positive ways.

      And it helped that I was surprised to find myself IMimg with my own kids at home...

      --
      "speaking only for myself since 1957"
  118. star trek! by aj444 · · Score: 2, Funny

    lets face it, star trek style comm badges is were this is all heading.

  119. The Difference by Kwil · · Score: 1

    Between your intercom and IMing is that your intercomm required a specific action from you in order to communicate -- one that took you away from whatever else it was you were doing. You used the intercom *only* when you wanted to tell them something.

    The IMing family works because the family is already on their own computers anyway. If the people are already on their computers, the IM does not take them away from what they're already doing, it's asynchronous communication, so can wait a few minutes if you're very involved in something, in short, it can make communicating between families easier.

    Now, it's true that kids need to get outdoors and have some direct interaction with people, but IMing isn't the problem here.

    --

    That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  120. Re:At work, I've IM'd the person *sitting next to by QuasiEvil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And I send email and IMs to the guy in the next cube over all the time, for two simple reasons:

    a) Email, because there's no reason for me to try to verbally explain a problem when I can just send the original report, with all the details, over for his review

    Or...

    b) IM because there are just some things that shouldn't be shouted in a corporate environment, even though I'm already known by my coworkers for loud strings of four-letter expletives, especially when dealing with the marketing, revenue, or legal departments. Also good for sending backchannel thoughts while sitting on giant conference calls (and my phone doesn't have a mute button)

  121. Incredibly Off-Topic by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1
    Because I have a computer at work, three computers at home, and regularly visit slashdot at other locations, all of which require logging in or otherwise maintaining a cookie, and requires the use of yet another password and username, all for to accomplish the ostensibly simple task of reading an article.

    People complain about it because it is a repetitive waste of time and memory to deal with all this, not to mention a privacy violation if you actually enter correct information in an attempt to simplify your account management.

    People resent it because practically no one else makes you register to read their silly articles.

    And just to cut any repliers off at the pass, as a matter of fact, I don't read the articles because I have to register.

    I'm not trashing on you in particular about not posting the Google cache. you are correct about that. I'm just offering an answer to your question. People complain about it because a significant subset of slashdotters have simply too many computers/too many login accounts/or care significantly about privacy, and so registration is a huge annoyance to them and they won't do it. Consequently, even the presence of a NYTimes article is a waste of their time.

    Personally I would like to see a filter to hide all slashdot articles that require registration to access.

    Thanks for your submission nonetheless.

    1. Re:Incredibly Off-Topic by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

      You're right, this thread is OT, but: if you are willing to "suffer" by providing a single valid email address and password, and squirreling it away with the other 200 random email addresses and passwords you provide such sites, you can register once on each computer and then forget about it. That's what I do.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
    2. Re:Incredibly Off-Topic by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Because I have a computer at work, three computers at home, and regularly visit slashdot at other locations, all of which require logging in or otherwise maintaining a cookie, and requires the use of yet another password and username, all for to accomplish the ostensibly simple task of reading an article. "

      Bitch to NYT, not Slashdot.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Incredibly Off-Topic by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      I'm not in the camp that starts a new thread complaining about NYT every time someone submits their stories. He asked, I offered my situation. A typical transaction for me involving a NYTimes article on Slashdot is to simply ignore it, without complaining or responding, and move on to the next submission.

      Given the opportunity to explain in detail why I hate it, I did.

    4. Re:Incredibly Off-Topic by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      I do the same thing- ignore articles that refer to the NYT. It is telling that so many submissions from /. readers reference the n.y times- groupthink at it's finest. For a group of people that supposedly values its independent thinking, /.'ers seem to be NYT lemmings.

      I read Slashdot because the people here tend to refute my views, not agree with them. I wish that the readers would do the same in their choice of daily reading.

      The outright leftist bias of the NYT and their willingness to lie makes them an ill choice for reference.

  122. Why use text instead of voice? Use Teamspeak. by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    What we've done is set up teamspeak on all hte machines in the house, all connected to an internal server.

    The laptops have mics and speakers built in, and mics for the desktops are easy enough to come by. They're all set up for push-to-talk, and communications throughout the house is simple.

    I was thinking of getting an intercom system when it hit me that I already have machines in most rooms in the house, and with teamspeak, it doesn't matter what OS each machine is running, and it's free...

  123. The real reason... by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

    Why can't people register, for free, without complaining?

    Because we don't want to?

  124. 4 years and still going by serenarae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My entire family (all five of us) have had aim accounts since '99. My mom uses it at work to message us at home and we use it at home to message each other throughout the house rather than yelling (it pisses dad off). All in all, it's made our life a little quieter and peaceful. Downside is, you have a better chance of talking to someone on AIM than in person around here. Eh, welcome to the digital revolution I guess...

    --
    see sig. see sig run. run sig run.
  125. The street finds its own use for Google by Geartest.com · · Score: 1

    the google cache isn't intended to bypass site registration policies.

    To paraphrase from Johnny Mnemonic, the street finds its own use for Google (apologies to William Gibson).

    It doesn't matter that the Google link isn't intended to bypass site registration policies. Policies are not law. People tend to take the path of least resistance.

    If letting people read their articles through a Google referral wasn't in the interest of the New York Times, it would be no problem for the NYT to disallow referrals.

    FYI, if you look closely, it's not a cache. It's a business relationship. partner=GOOGLE should be the first clue. The number of readers that the Google referral gives the NYT means that it can charge more for advertising. So it's a win-win-win proposition.

    Google gains loyalty and repeat traffic from its users, the reader gets to read the article without registration and login hassles, and the New York Times gets more readers and can charge more for advertising.

    Why can't people see that there's no harm done, so there's really no need to get holier-than-thou?

    1. Re:The street finds its own use for Google by Frisky070802 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Indeed, I read "google link" as "google cache" rather than "google cash". I didn't look at the URL.

      If the NYT is paying Google for these hits, and no longer cares about registration, then indeed it's its own problem.

      Thanks for the explanation.

      --
      Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  126. OT: Eating Cake by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Seriously, you want your cake and to eat it.

    Cake isn't much good unless you can eat it...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:OT: Eating Cake by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That phrase does rank amongst the worlds lamest - it's totally self defeating.

      Yes I *do* want my cake and eat it because I can hardly eat it if I *don't* have the cake can I!!!

    2. Re:OT: Eating Cake by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      It used to be something like "you can't eat your cake and still have it" but those crazy Victorians mixed up the word order. Those crazy Victorians are also to blame for Flutterby becoming Butterfly etc.

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    3. Re:OT: Eating Cake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the saying is lost on most people. Once you eat your cake, you don't have it anymore. Simple, yes?

    4. Re:OT: Eating Cake by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The phrase is based on a statement made by Queen Marie Antionette of France.

      When her advisors requested that she assist starving peasants who had no meat or grain, her reply was "then let them eat cake"

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:OT: Eating Cake by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

      Bit like 'the exception that proves the rule' - 'prove' completely changed its meaning (basically from 'disprove') making that statement a bit odd except when you've just been owned in a debate. Although that's not the fault of bad grammar, I see no reason not to blame the Victorians for that too.

  127. No it doesn't hurt by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    Except sometimees I tell my gf that there's no need to msg me when I'm in the next room.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  128. In my apartment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often talk with my roommate by IM. We can have quite delightful conversations while he's in the privacy of his own room, but getting much out of him outside of it is impossible.

    Posted anonymously, for obvious reasons.

  129. Straying even more off topic... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I can hardly eat it if I *don't* have the cake can I!!!

    Maybe you could eat someone else's cake?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Straying even more off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ::Morpheus voice::

      There is no cake.

  130. Who needs IM ... by Dark$ide · · Score: 1

    ... I'm running IRCD on linux so we can have our own private personal channels.

    --

    Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

  131. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You receive the award for "Biggest Slashdot Loser Weenie of the Year", and it's only January 3rd. Way to go, twatbox.

    1. Re:Congratulations by LC+Gundo · · Score: 3, Funny
      I really wasn't expecting this.

      I'd like to thank all the little people who made this possible.

      --
      I'm time traveling, right now
  132. my quest by splint3r · · Score: 1

    Heh, that's funny I was wondering exactly the same thing and came up with some startling discoveries.

  133. It's helped our family's communication.. by mstra · · Score: 1

    Granted, we're somewhat geographically distanced now (one of my sisters lives with the folks in the burbs, and the other is in college, while I am in the city), but we talk a lot more now.

    I don't call my sister on the phone to chat, we do it on IM. It's a lot easier, and I don't think anything is "lost"; as other posters have pointed out, the communication is async. I can chat with my college sister while watching TV, or doing work. And she does likewise.

    The one that always amuses me is when I talk to my mother through my sister - the sister at home will be on IM, and my mom is in the same room watching TV. So little sister becomes the conduit. Yes, I could call my mom to ask these questions, but it is much easier to tell my sister to just ask her. What becomes funny is when the quick "ask mom what time I should come over on Saturday" becomes a long conversation all done via the third party. Especially when little sister editorializes the messages.

    --
    Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
  134. Preserving the peace and quiet... by dbirchall · · Score: 1
    Ever since I was a teenager and my sister used to get into shouting matches with my mom, I've really hated yelling, especially between rooms or floors. I don't have a really loud voice anyway, and since my "office" is currently a corner of the basement where it's hard to hear (or be heard by) people in other rooms if the washer's running, the neighbor's hunting dogs are barking, etc., being able to use IM as a backup is nice.

    It's particularly useful for sharing URLs (who wants to shout those?) and interesting little snippets of articles, etc.

    There are some weaknesses, of course - mainly that my wife tends to have a bunch of windows open, and chat windows (particularly mine) get lost in the clutter. :)

  135. Why read the article? by Kash-Mulc · · Score: 1

    The article really only gives summary of what IM is and does without really looking at the impacts as the title may suggest. When 75% of teenagers and 50% of adults online are using/have used IM of some sort(and I'm sure the percentage is higher for /.ers), who is this article targeted towards?

  136. EMAIL is much better than IM for that by billstewart · · Score: 1

    When I'm working, I really don't like being interrupted. We've got an internal IM system at work which some of the people use; it's mainly useful when we've got 3-hour training conference calls and you want to converse with someone without filling up the whole screen with Outlook.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  137. Long distance by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    I realise thats not what this is about.... but I live in New York and my parents in Bombay, India. So IM and text mnessaging on the phone is really the only practical way for me to keep in regular touch. I can't really afford to make phone calls more than once every week or two.

  138. at school by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    I've been in college, and my mom's gotten quite handy with her computer. She loves to jump online and check out what i'm doing on my away messages (which is usually ending up in a gutter somewhere)... but that's fine by me, she knwos what she's getting into be seeing what I do!

    It's way easier to just say hi and a few quick things than calling -- sometimes it's just to leave a quick message even if i'm away.

    I also got a digital camera for xmas and have lots of pictures up too... haha they'll love all the beerse i hold!

    --
    Berto
  139. Dad Got Twit-Filtered by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

    A friend told me that after her husband retired, he IM'd their son at college so much that the son blocked the dad's messages.

    I've never used IM because it seems too distracting and obtrusive, but my wife and I e-mail each other sometimes, usually to forward e-mail or web links. If she needs an answer right away, she calls from her office phone to mine.

    And if she needs computer help, I log onto her machine with pcAnywhere.

  140. No More Yelling In My House by dave1g · · Score: 1

    Ever since we got multiple computers and I taught my mom how to use aim, when dinner is ready I will get an IM instead of her screaming at the top of her lungs, much more civilized.

    Not so much anymore since I live in an apartment at college but it has resumed now that I am home for the holidays.

    Also getting mom and Dad used ot talkign to me on AIM has caused them to pickup more and more computer skills and experience and they nw chat with family and friends online, as well as myself when im at college.

    If its important I will still get a call on my cell phone but if its your avg. "how was your day?" I get an IM, I like it that way.

  141. Sad State by zachjb · · Score: 1

    If you have to IM your family members to find out what they want for dinner, then you, my friend, have a sad family.

    Not only would this break down the barriers between family members, but it will ruin your communication links and skills. Remember, emotions cannot be portrayed through text.

    --

    --If only there was a license required to use a computer.
  142. i only wish this happened at my place by h4ter · · Score: 1

    My two roommates and I moved in all not knowing each other, and we haven't exactly become friends. It's not like we hate each other or something, we just have our own lives. When we see each other around the apartment, nothing really gets said. But we're often all home, in our respective rooms, at our computers.

    I think it'd be a good way for the three of us to start forming a bond.

  143. Possible downsides by maniac1860 · · Score: 1

    Here and here

  144. Works for me by xhentil-d · · Score: 1

    We have wired computers in near every room of the house, plus a wireless set up. When my brother, from out of town, came home for Christmas, there would be three of us sitting in the living room with our laptops. We wouldn't always IM, or at times do it as a joke. It's easy to IM link. We'll be talking, "Whoa, hey, check this link out!" Or, at one time, my mom and I were discussing what to get my dad for Christmas over IM. Why IM? He was sitting in the same room as us. I'd look at things I wanted to get him, send her the link. She approved, I eventually ordered it all right there, and he never knew the better? As well, I live in the attic. One post above mentioned how the guy lived in his basement and had an intercom. Well, that's me, but in the attic. And yes, I am a hermit. Often times my mom and I will talk on IM cause she doesn't like to come up here, and there is nothing for me to do down there. Normally though, I use it to talk to friends, people out of town, etc... I don't substitute it for normal conversation, but it is useful.

    --
    Xhentil Do'ana
  145. IM in the house by ka6sox · · Score: 1

    We live in an apartment and IM across the room...it tends to keep the general noise level down in the house. (and our 2yr old can't read that mommy and daddy are plotting to get him to bed)

  146. Arguing over IM... by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    IM is especially beneficial in dissagreements - people are forced to support their claims with coherent and logical arguments, rather than increasing the volume of their speech.

  147. Lazy People by Twintop · · Score: 1

    My brother and I are in adjacent rooms down the same hallway. His computer is 1 wall and 15 feet away. If we even speak a little louder than usual, we can hear each other without any problems. This is why when he sends me an IM I call him a lazy bastard and tell him to come to my room if he has something to say. Every time. Without fail.

  148. Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you... by X-wes · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    There was once a young man who walked around Seattle. Every time he visited a popular store, he would first have to stand still as some random part of his body was pierced and a little tag hung from the piercing. Of course, he was free to dodge this little nuisance, but he would often be denied access to the store. (The most popular and chic stores would always do this.) Of course, to receive the "convenience" of wearing a more permanent tag, one would register with the store, giving far too much personal information. But it was worth it, wasn't it? After all, it wouldn't be annoying at all to be tracked by this tag, along with others from advertisers, while going through life, would it?

    Give me a break

    Cookies were, in concept, a great thing, but they have become abused by advertisers. However, to block cookies is unwise, since many websites require cookies to allow entry. I take a compromise and have all cookies deleted at the end of the current session.

    The New York Times asks for registration, and the parent post argues that this one-time exploitation of personal information is enough--cookies will sign the particular user back in for subsequent sessions. There are, however, problems with this:

    1. I take offense to having my personal information exploited, even if it only occurs in one instance. (n.b.: not "one instance" here, since the data is kept on file.)

    2. I take offense to being tracked, and having my viewing patterns and other information available to a party. (n.b.: this applies to NYT as well as their advertisers.)

    3. I should not be penalised for my pursuit of privacy (a right which should already be enforced by others) by having to take extraordinary measures to perform regular tasks.

    I recommend the parent author to rethink his words for accuracy.

  149. Astounding by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    So that means there are actually two users of ICQ out there?

    --
    Photos.
  150. Sad State of Affairs by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The very fact we are even discussing this is sad.

    It just another example of the slow destruction of the family.

    Spend time with your family.. dont go hide and send them messages.. geesh.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  151. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got no problem with cookies for sites that you obviously need you to be log in to, like Slashdot and forums, but why does the NYT need this?

    I browse /. from at least 10 different computers on any given day, and it's very annoying when I click on just-another-article-link and get hit with yet another NYT login page.

  152. Scary Concept by Schlaegel · · Score: 2

    To me this sounds ludicrous.
    If you can consistently IM your family, then I guess that (1) your family is using computers too much, (2) you are not spending enough time together, and (3) you are getting too sedentary.

    I imagine a house with 4 computers in 4 different rooms where mom, dad, son, and daughter all sit alone staring at the phosphorus. It sounds lonely and brings up images of the BORG.

  153. It's to prevent shouting... by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Oh get off your high horse.

    Without IM:

    "Darling, I'm ordering the Tescos - do we need any more shower gel?"

    "Sorry?"

    "Do we need any more shower gel?"

    "WHAAAT I CAN'T HEAR YOU?"

    "DO WE NEED ANY MORE SHOWER GEL?"

    "NO - I ORDERED TWO BOTTLES LAST TIME"

    "THANK YOU"

    With IM:

    (Tappitty Tappitty Tappitty)

    (Tappitty Tappitty Tappitty)

    (Tappitty)

    There are some things it's not worth stopping what you are doing and going downstairs to just say 'yes' or 'no' about - it's not laziness. These are the things you normally shout around the house about. If you're both on IM you can just ask without needing to bawl the house down. Lovely.

    Seriously, every single time you talk to a family member do you get up and make sure you talk face to face? Of course not. Some stuff you just call out about.

  154. does any one remeber intercoms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just like intercom systems, i mean it's just the further lazification of north american society and the degradation of families,

  155. Examples by tarsi210 · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it's being unique, sometimes friendly, sometimes convenient...

    In college, we used it to ask someone to bring us a beer...our apartment was long and narrow and it was easier when the stereo was on than shouting or getting up...after all, college is for laziness.

    Now, at work, I use it all the time via Vivster to communicate with my fellow programmers...yes, they're in the same office without walls or cubes to separate us, but when you're deep into code, an IM is much less intrusive than a spoken word...you can queue an IM until a bit later whereas spoken information flips an interrupt in your brain immediately.

    Sometimes an IM can get a conversation started between my fiancee and I that would have been difficult to start in person, just due to the sensitivity of it. Sometimes written word can be more explicit than spoken.

    The right tool for the right context, I say.

  156. "reliably online?" not a good idea. by immel · · Score: 0, Troll

    I find it extremely annoying when my each family member hogs 20-25 threads on our system when all they are doing is being on AIM, broadcasting an away message. This makes it impossible for me to do any decent graphical calculations (or play ArmyOps). "reliably being on AIM" merely causes fights over CPU time between family members.

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
  157. Packet Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm having trouble deciding which as more packet loss, my house or my ISP...

    Pinging 12.0.0.2 with "What's for dinner?"
    Reply from 12.0.0.2: "What?!?!!?"
    Reply from 12.0.0.2: "HUH?!!?!"
    Request timed out.
    Reply from 12.0.0.2: "I still can't hear you!"
    Reply from 12.0.0.2: "Oh - Meatloaf!!!!!"

    Ping statistics for 12.0.0.2:
    Packets: Sent = 5, Received = 1, Lost = 4 (80% loss)

  158. Cat's in the cradle by fleener · · Score: 1

    Bad parenting is no longer limited to the uneducated, drug-addicted set. Now geeks can neglect their children too. Why spend your time parenting when you can sit your kid in front of a TV or computer so you have time to yourself? Why walk in the next room to talk to your kid and see what they're up to, when you can just an IM and forget it?

    See, the thing is, parents today want to live the same lives they did before they made babies. They treat their children like adults, regardless of age, so that the parents can continue enjoying adult things.

    I explain this just so you don't wonder about it when you notice a plethora of kids under 6 years of age watching Return of the King, Last Samurai and Cold Mountain.

    1. Re:Cat's in the cradle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > I explain this just so you don't wonder about it
      > when you notice a plethora of kids under 6 years
      > of age watching Return of the King, Last Samurai
      > and Cold Mountain.

      What's wrong with any of those films? Sure, they're violent, but at least the kids aren't watching Finding Nemo or Debbie Does Dallas.

  159. IM issues by Admiral+Lazzurs · · Score: 1

    I think this one is a no brainer. It is all about the way that people use IM. We had the same discussion at work recently (which sadly meant IM got banned).

    IM is only a problem/imterruption/hassle what ever if you let it be. If you let it rule your life then , just like email/cellphone/any new comms method, it will.

    Good luck, hope you find a way that suits you.

    Take care - RL

    1. Re:IM issues by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      When they banned IM at my last job, I just took greater methods to pretend I wasn't using it, and at the same time made sure to check my email only once a week "just in case" it caused inefficiency too.

      Companies which ban IM can fuck my boot.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  160. The greatest hazard with messaging my husband.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is that a new trillian window has an annoying tendency to break him out of whatever fullscreen program he was running, and occasionally to crash it.

    And we're sitting physically *next* to each other. On the same desk, with two computers. And we still message each other. :)

    Generally either to paste a URL or when we're arguing (argue with PRECISION - keep logs!)

    Messages are occasionally sent upstairs to the other generally-on-the-computer member of the household, but she tends not to respond quickly, so if you really want an answer out of her we go and ask in person. If it's non-urgent we message.

  161. condolences by PollGuy · · Score: 1

    I laughed at your post and then perused your site until I got to your blog.

    On behalf of all of us here at Slashdot, deepest condolences for your loss.

    If that is someone else's blog... nevermind.

  162. Helpful in hostile situations by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Surprised that no one has mentioned this

    In the case of a high conflict divorce with children involved, IM'ing can be a relatively low conflict way, for the children to keep in touch with the parent they're not currently with at a given time. (In many cases, the children feel on the spot if they're on the phone with one parent while within earshot of the other.)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  163. Case Silencer by soloport · · Score: 1

    I might be able to help you with that.

    All I can say is: Wow...

    1. Re:Case Silencer by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      All I can say is: Wow...

      Is that "Wow" as "Good Job!" or as in "You're a nutcase!"? :)

    2. Re:Case Silencer by soloport · · Score: 1

      No, it just looked like lots of work. You really appreciate "quiet". You should run a sound studio!

    3. Re:Case Silencer by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      No, it just looked like lots of work.

      It was lots of fun, too. Then again, a friend helped me and everything we do together is fun. I guess that's the social aspect of it, though.

      At the very least, I appreciate being able to hear my music without having it drowned out by the noise of the computer.

      You really appreciate "quiet". You should run a sound studio!

      I wish I had that kind of money ;)

  164. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1
    They're providing the service. It's their prerogative to try and track usage, and your prerogative not to visit their site. But I take offense when I post an article, accepted by the Slashdot Czars, only to be chided for not posting a workaround to the article to bypass the NYT's attempts.

    So, I've been defensive about this, and am getting modded as offtopic in this defense (unlike the others commenting on the privacy issue, oddly enough).

    This debate notwithstanding, the grandparent of this made an excellent point about the tension between the desire of the stores/websites to get this info and the desires of individuals to be left alone.

    And, for the record, I've recognized my mistake in thinking the google link bypassed the NYT site, and will be happy to at least try to identify such links in the future. Just like it's the prerogative of the NYT to ask for registration, it's the prerogative of others to use a back door left so wide open.

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  165. Supper's ready NOW! by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I admit it, I have used er, abused IM to the point where I have told the kids supper is ready. It was an exparament sorta. I actually think I got a better response then just yelling for them.

    I do seriously use it to IM them when they are at their friends or boyfriends. I hate to admit it but one of their friends will know where they are and get the word to them. There is a new culture brewing with teens today, they are all online and it is a secondary means of communication for them.

    One of the more unique things that I am aware of is that my daugter has several classes where the kids do their homework together via IM/chat with the full approval and santion of their teacher.

  166. IM problematic for me by obtuse · · Score: 1

    I can't use IM. I guess I haven't learned to use it well.

    I don't know how allocate appropriate resources to IM while trying to get something done. It also seems like it results in endless small talk. I'm just really bad at that in text. Does this happen to other people too?

    Result: alienated friend or stupid mistake at work or both.

    This is similar to what used to happen when I'd try to write a letter. I'd either convey approximately nothing, or get so caught up in details that I was suddenly on my way to writing a novella. It's a personal problem, I guess.

    The same thing can happen when I'm on the phone, but I've learned to multitask better there, and my friends can recognize my tone of voice even if I don't realize it's time to hang up.

    I'd really like to learn to use this tool better. I guess it's just practice. Any other suggestions? (Don't be a dumbass doesn't count.)

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:IM problematic for me by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      The best suggestion I can give you is to realize that IM is a time-delayed medium, despite the connotation "Instant Messaging" may have. The most common problem I see with people who have trouble using IM is that they seem under the impression that you have to answer every single IM the second you get it. Instead, focus on getting to a good break point in what you were doing, then answer it.

      Most people aren't going to be bothered by a couple of minutes delay between IMs, so don't force interupt yourself in the middle of a task to answer an IM. Finish the section of code, thought of a paragraph, whatever it was you were working on, then answer. One thing I've found that helps tremendously in this regard is to turn off sounds. For example, I have all sounds except for the very first IM I receive turned off. This way you have the window blink on the taskbar, which is far less jarring than the stupid ringing sounds IM clients use every three seconds :)

      Good luck, and I'm glad you're at least willing to try rather than simply write IM off as some people here would do.

  167. If I was the submitter.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

    I'd be more worried about the fact that I considered being on IM as "being instantly and constantly accessible to one's spouse and children."

  168. Al fine, except 4 pesky lawnmower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intracranial wireless AIM ! And a double-monitor setup - one per optic nerve ! Extra space in the cerebellum can be used as the Doom server.

  169. In our frat.... by satyap · · Score: 1

    Well, okay, it wasn't a frat, just 5-6 guys living in 1 fairly small house. Almost every one of us had computers. We'd regularly be IMing each other (and then laughing out loud), because it's a pain to shout through an open doorway. Sound never seems to travel distinctly through doorways.

    Then there was the time the roommate sitting next to me sent me email to (basically) say 'yes'. Our computer cases were less than 6 inches apart at the time.

    1. Re:In our frat.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  170. Re:Get off the keyboard and walk into Junior's roo by hendersj · · Score: 1

    If you think that's bad, you should see the response a kid has when he discovers that technology means you can be watching even when you're not standing right there.

    Enter one copy of Ethereal and one copy of a remote desktop viewing software package, installed in stealth mode.

    You never saw a teenager clean up their act faster than when they saw a replay of an IM conversation through a sniffer after they complained about slow network access.

    When a kid's friends - like his parent's friends - are scattered throughout the planet and aren't local, IM is a great way to keep in touch. It sure saves on phone bills.

    --
    Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  171. What about bots? by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1, Funny
    kid:is dinner ready yet?

    mom:wow, you really don't eat much for lunch. I'll get it ready

    (translation: kid is doing weed with his friends and getting the munchies)

    mom: are you ready for dinner?

    dad (autoreply): don't bother me for 30 minutes in the bedroom, I've got a videoconference

    (reality dad's screwing the babysitter)

    Once mom gets her own bot figured out this family will really be f'd up

  172. Text can be very intimate by dsfox · · Score: 1

    I find that IM-ing with my wife is in some ways more intimate than talking. This is nothing new, people have been having deep and intimate relationships via the post for hundreds of years.

    1. Re:Text can be very intimate by VerbalPapsmear · · Score: 1

      I agree with the subject that text can be very intimate. For some people it is hard to express their feelings face to face with someone. I find it easier to express myself through IM/email/writing because it gives you time to put your thoughts into order. At the same time I think it's more rewarding to do it face to face with the person but IM could be the first steps toward pvp intimacy.

      I've never been able to ask my parents real* intimate question but if they used IM things would be easier. If they laugh you can just warn em a bunch!

      *(real != asking if dinner is on)

  173. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
    "I take offense to being tracked, and having my viewing patterns and other information available to a party. (n.b.: this applies to NYT as well as their advertisers.)"
    So be offended. No one ever said you had the right to live your whole life and never be offended. If you really care about this issue that much, do something about it. I would wager a small sum of money that you've posted your stance on Slashdot concerning this issue and done nothing else. Place some phone calls to the New York Times. Place some phone calls to advertisers who support the Times. Do something about it.
    "I should not be penalised for my pursuit of privacy (a right which should already be enforced by others) by having to take extraordinary measures to perform regular tasks."
    You shouldn't? Oh, so you think that security cameras in public settings should never be used? After all, your image is being viewed and recorded by others. Perhaps you don't look your best on a particular day and, wanting to retain your privacy on your unkept appearance, don't believe that you should be penalized in this manner and that security cameras should be turned off for you and that checkout clerks should avert their eyes. Honestly, if you don't like how a private company runs their business, don't support them. You have no right to have your needs completely satisfied by a company. All you can do is either raise your concerns and wait for change or take your business elsewhere.

    You should rethink your rights in regards to private corporations and how they operate.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  174. Anxious kids with no social skills? by SiMac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Then what are they developing by talking to people? Anti-social skills?

  175. IM between Room Mates by Sausage · · Score: 1

    Me and my room mates always use ICQ to talk to each other, lots of the time the phone will ring, and u will get a IM saying that the phone is for u. it is a great working system.

  176. Mac OS X Java3D link by Mac+Weinberg · · Score: 0

    It's not obvious to find the download for this. Here.

  177. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by falsified · · Score: 1
    I've said it before, and I'll say it again.

    Some script on some server doesn't give a shit what you put down for a name and address. Make something up. Sign up an enemy. Be obscene in your falsification of data. Wallow in lies. You're lying to a computer. This will not come back to bite you in the ass.

    Hell, my ISP has no idea what my real name is. I signed up in person and prepaid in cash. Let the New York Times "track" Chochi Gonzalez of Forest Park, Illinois, for example (that's what I am. Feel free to use it.)

    Additionally, the NYT doesn't give a shit what web sites you look at. I doubt they're tracking you, especially for personal data; perhaps they'd want aggregate data, in which case you have nothing to fear anyway. You're in far more danger of letting the phone company know your real identity.

    Oh wait.

    --
    HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
  178. Face-to-Face: Enhanced by Z3LD4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I'm home from college, the only IMs my mom and I send back and forth are usually "could you come here a minute?" Being part of a geek family, we send links, pictures and such back and forth. It dosen't have to be all about "conversations."

  179. IM the cat by DRACO- · · Score: 1

    My brother is constantly on the phone with his girlfriend and forgets what he is doing online. He tends to barracade the cat in his room to play with her while hes talking on the phone or playing on the computer. I logged off Ymessenger last night and I heard this loud laugh. My brother came in and said that when I logged off yahoo, the sound his messenger made (a door closing) caused the cat to attack the computer beating at the keyboard as she was sitting beside the laptop.

    Funny, I wish it was on tape.

    DRACO-

    --
    Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  180. Intrafamily IMs by SpringWolf · · Score: 0

    My husbands PC is in a loft that over looks the living room. The living room is usually where I am with my laptop. We can see each other through the banister, and occasionally talk in IMs. Not because we're lazy, or antisocial, but because it becomes an easy way to "talk" without making noise and waking up our 7 month old baby.

    --
    - Spring
  181. We don't use it in the house by PotatoHead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    because our house is small, so voice works just fine. However, I do IM from work. My kids will ask when I am getting home, help with homework questions, and deliver the wife's to-do list. (Hate that last one...)

    Anyway, it's pretty cool in that my kids know they can reach me before the early evening hours. I also know they are home :)

    IM in the house seems really silly to me, but maybe some folks like the quiet...

  182. Re:At work, I've IM'd the person *sitting next to by lithiumfox · · Score: 1

    Good way to avoid doing work without the boss knowing.

  183. But it already exists... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1
    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  184. Re:Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death.. by MaddJackKidd · · Score: 1

    Hear, Hear!
    All my friends and I at school IM each other (yes, even my roommate/suitemates), but we use proper spelling/typing/grammar.
    I also make a point to harrass anyone - especially my little sister - who spells words with numbers, or uses horrid abbreviation, or anything mutated beyond belief.

  185. Re:Get off the keyboard and walk into Junior's roo by Scott+Hale · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Enter one copy of Ethereal and one copy of a remote desktop viewing software package, installed in stealth mode.

    Enter one good parent, with the intent of installing good morals in their teenager. Beats the Hell out of using software to spy on your kids all day long.

    You never saw a teenager clean up their act faster than when they saw a replay of an IM conversation through a sniffer after they complained about slow network access.

    And watch how fast the trust breaks between teenager and parent. Keeping a constant eye on your kids will probably deter them from doing anything you wouldn't approve of, however, in doing so, you not only break the trust, but also risk having your kids despise you.

    Also, the conversations your teenager has with his/her friends are private, and, for the most part, none of your business. One day your kids will have to face the world on their own, and you won't be there to hold their hand and watch over them.

    If you think that's bad, you should see the response a kid has when he discovers that technology means you can be watching even when you're not standing right there.

    The immediate response is that they fall in line pretty fast. However, you are also telling them how little you trust them to do the right thing without your immediate supervision.

    I have recently moved off to college, but I guess I was fortunate in my home; I held all the keys when it came to the network and the Internet connection. However, I do remember back in the early days of instant messaging when I left a computer sitting wide open with ICQ running. My mom took the opportunity to poke through my logs, and, of course, she was rather displeased with some of the language I had used. She had every right to be angry about what she found, but the fact that she poked around caused an irreversable change. She had proved to me that she did not trust me to handle myself accordingly, and it forced me to lock down every electronic device I owned. It also caused me to withdraw from my family. I used to keep my computer(s) downstairs, in plain view of my parents. However, I moved up to my room after hearing one too many "What are you typing over there?" comments. It caused me to withdraw from my family, but it was the only way I could escape constant harassment and have a little privacy.

    And the language 'problem'? Well, it wasn't solved by my mom chewing me out. As I became older, I realized when certain language could be taken as crude and inappropriate.

    I guess what I'm trying to say is, instill good morals in your children, show them that you trust them, and it will probably lead to a better relationship.

  186. Re:Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death.. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

    I've actually pretty much concluded that it's a pretty decent indicator of intelligence. Of the people I talk to on IM, I've noticed that the ones that tend to be a bit smarter are the ones that tend to go 'the extra mile' needed to like one extra character to spell "to" instead of "2." And from talking to my friends, it seems I'm not the only one. IMing me with "hey, whut do u want 2 do 2nite?" is a surefire way to make me not want to do anything.

  187. Re:Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death.. by raodin · · Score: 1

    I'm this way, too. The only 'aol-isms' i use are the occasional LOL or smiley in IRC, and this is mostly for lack of a better solution. I pretty much ignore anything with numbers substituted for syllables.

  188. Re:Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death.. by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

    I know we tend to use emoticons or even XML tags (okay, only the truly geeky do this) to communicate ideas that would only be communicated via body language or the inflection of a person's voice. However, one has to remember that the letter was the primary means of communication before the telephone. Many of the great thinkers also had large volumes of correspondence. Thomas Jefferson wrote so many letters, he even "invented" a device to create multiple copies (like a very crude multi-tipped pen) of his letters. Historically, has there ever been a convention for conveying body language or meta-information in letters or did these writers learn to work within the limitation of their medium?

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
  189. Its a mess by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

    My dad uses Yahoo messenger and my sister uses MSN I use linux for everything but play games - so they are "You buy Windows games... why cant you talk on yahoo/MSN?" I had GAIM but Yahoo and MSN keep breaking itso they are "You PMed me last month why cant you now?" At the end of the day, I dont want to buy Viagra or watch people get pissed upon so I killed GAIM/my ICQ# as the primary source of spam in my life. i use Email now - because it just works

    --
    This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  190. Mum by Gantic · · Score: 1

    My mum was constantly contacting me on MSN saying things like "breakfast is ready!" or "lunch is ready!" or the worst one, "dinner is ready!". It got to the point that I blocked her. My sister and my mum are always chatting with each other though and they exchange various clothes websites with each other etc and take up double my bandwidth instead of just sitting round one computer and looking! *sigh*

    1. Re:Mum by Coram · · Score: 1

      Transparent proxy.... squid and iptables are your friends.

      --
      I say I ain't giving you no tree fiddy you goddamned Loch Ness monster, get yo own goddamned money!
  191. iChat and rendezvous by hc00jw · · Score: 1

    The benefits of using Mac OS X, with Apples free iChat (or "iChat AV" (read: webcam ready), free with jaguar) lets you message everybody remotely on your network over rendezvous, without needing an Internet connection, or indeed, having to create an account with any of these clients.

    I'm surprised nobody pointed this out sooner...

  192. Multimedia Communication by Databass · · Score: 1


    But when I'm a few meters away from the person I'm chatting with, I discovered that opening my mouth to talk was much better.

    Oh, I don't know. IM lets you use hyperlinks. If you know how to make audio, picture, and video content, or where to find it, you can augment your usual text-speech-text transmission pathways with sound and image. This is great for sharing experience without having to laborously describe in words. Want to give a family member directions to somewhere? Forget spelling it out in words talking to them in person. (They're good at tuning out your voice by now anyway.) Go AIM them a Yahoo Map to where you mean.

    A lot of family communication is about relaying experience, but movies might be easier than text in this regard.. "Hey mom! My friends and I just got back from the skatepark- I learned how to do a 360 Stalefish today!" "Uh... uh that's nice dear, what is that?" "Well you catch some air off the lip and then grab the board behind your..." ::mom's eyes glaze over:: "Here I'll send you a link to stalefish360.avi from www.tonyhawk.com..." "Oh, I see now dear. Also- never do that move again as long as you live in my house."

    In the future communication will likely be even more multi-media. After all, the ability to send images and soudns along with speech has some of the magic of telepathy.

  193. Shouting at the kids by cultyellow · · Score: 1

    DO YOUR HOMEWORK

  194. relevant UserFriendly link by mat.h · · Score: 1

    ...from the ill-fated Miranda/AJ romance (storyline starts a few days earlier, Nov 6).

  195. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just out of curiosity, what ISP allows you to pay in person and in cash?
    I wish Adelphia or Comcast let you do this.


    Of course, right now I'm sitting in the terminal of a major international airport, using a free WiFi connection I don't even know where-from (the SSID is just "guest"), so it doesn't get more anonymous than that I suppose. But it'd be nice to have at home.

  196. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by falsified · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a local ISP with only two numbers - one for my city and one for the bordering city. It's called Quantum World. They make the bulk of their money through their internet cafe and catered (Doritos and Dew) D&D tournaments - two services I never used. So, if you live in Sheboygan, Wisconsin, there you are. As you may have guessed, they only offer dialup, but it's only $8/month, and pretty reliable as far as $8/month goes.

    --
    HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
  197. Re:Speeding to an eventual linguistic heat death.. by miyako · · Score: 1

    While in spite of my efforts, I have fallen victim to some of the most ubiquitous "net slang", I do tend to completely dismiss those who use it to the point that the language is completely unrecognizable.
    I do use "lol", and even will allow "u" and "r" in place of "you" and "are" to slip out on rare occasions, I find that even if I am able to understand some of the butchered language, I refuse to communicate with someone who insists on using such obfuscated language that I cannot immediately recognize it as english.

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  198. how to spell 'H' by calyxa · · Score: 1

    aitch.

    -calyxa

    --
    Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
  199. Re:Here, have a cookie. I promise by the time you. by RodgerDodger · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to be tracked on the net while visiting the New York Times web site, then here's a novel suggestion for you:

    Buy a bloody newspaper. It's what, a couple of dollars? Complete privacy. You can even keep it for later reading (as opposed to the free NYT website articles, which aren't accessible when they're archived)

    The NYT web site is free in money terms, non-free in other ways. Deal with it.

    --
    "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  200. try this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try this at

    c:\net send /domain:workgroup dinner's ready!

    at commandline :)

    C:\>net help send
    The syntax of this command is:

    NET SEND
    {name | * | /DOMAIN[:name] | /USERS} message

    Sends messages to other users, computers, or messaging names on the network. The Messenger
    service must be running to receive messages.

    You can send a message only to a name that is
    active on the network. If the message is sent to a
    username, that user must be logged on and running
    the Messenger service to receive the message.

    name Is the username, computername, or messaging name to send the message to. If the name is a computername that contains blank characters, enclose the alias in quotation marks (" "). Sends the message to all the names in your group. /DOMAIN[:name] Sends the message to all the names in the workstation domain. If name is specified, the message is sent to all the names in the specified domain or workgroup. /USERS Sends the message to all users connected to the server.

    message Is text to be sent as a message.

    NET HELP command | MORE displays Help one screen at a time.

    *and thanks for the useless formating /.*

  201. Can you say Jabber? by TheScienceKid · · Score: 1

    http://www.jabber.org/wiki/index.php/E2E - I can personally vouch for Jabber having an encrypted mode.

    1. Re:Can you say Jabber? by yipyow · · Score: 1

      i have been trying to get my friends to use this for years. many of the clients are only half-implementations of all the features jabber has, and some of them just downright suck. for instance many of the clients don't have encrypted mode. what i mean is we need something simple that everyone can use, or something that attaches to regular old aim so the illiterates can use it.

  202. well, if you live far apart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I live across the ocean from my folks, IM really helps us stay in better touch, as long distance phone calls are really expensive, so we only use those for emergencies or special occasions. I feel IM has actually brought the family closer together in some ways, its somthing to do with type I think, things you wouldnt normally talk about in person, you seem more open to do so through type.. so go cry in a closet.

  203. Re:Get off the keyboard and walk into Junior's roo by hendersj · · Score: 1

    I realize this is a couple of days late, have been on the road.

    I find it somewhat amusing that you seem to think that I have a bad relationship with my stepson - matter of fact, he's one of the most responsible 16-year-olds I know, we allow him to have his computer in his room, and as a result of the incident (which actually happened years ago), he knows where the limits are and why they're there.

    You are correct, however, that software supervision is not the only thing necessary - and certainly, that isn't the only piece of the puzzle - there does have to be good communication as well, explaining why it's important and outlining what the consequences are for actions - and that he needs to take responsibility for his actions.

    But parents need to take some time to learn how the technology works as well - and I think that's one difference in our household than in others; I work with technology on a daily basis, and consequently, know more about how this all works than the average parent. My stepson knows this, and respects my knowledge, frequently seeking my advice.

    It also prepares him for the real world, so when he gets out there and gets a job, he knows what's acceptable in the workplace and what is not, and also what means are out there to catch him if he does something wrong. He knows the importance of keeping a password secure, and will never write it down on a post-it note where someone can frame him for inappropriate use of a company's computing resources.

    --
    Insanity is a gradual process; don't rush it.
  204. What about learning styles? by Lilwolfpuppy · · Score: 1

    I've surfed through a number of comments on this, and I haven't yet seen a discussion on learning styles.

    Frankly, I'm not someone who absorbs information well by audio. I have to pay attention to talk radio to understand what's going on, even though I am interested in the topic. On the other hand, written information registers. I remember things people type to me, sometimes verbatim, and catch typos even when I am not paying attention. It only makes sense that I would prefer the method of communication with which I am natively most comfortable.

    Any other writerly types feel the same way?