Slashdot Mirror


PowerBooks & iBooks Get Speed Bumped

Currawong writes "Apple has, as rumors predicted, speed bumped its line of portables. The PowerBooks now come in 1.33 and 1.5Ghz G4 versions, including either NVidia 5200's or Radeon 9700 video hardware. The iBooks can now be had at 1 or 1.2Ghz with Radeon 9200 video included. All can be purchased at the Apple Store. This complements nicely the recent speed and feature increases on the eMac range."

485 of 751 comments (clear)

  1. Good news! by protonman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good news, I've been looking at getting a notebook for some time now and my little research indicated a superior battery life on Apple notebooks.

    The prohibitive price is still a bottleneck for me though.

    --
    The man of knowledge must be able not only to love his enemies but also to hate his friends.
    1. Re:Good news! by capmilk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a bit like buying a Ferrari: The first one is really costly, but resale value makes later models pretty affordable.

    2. Re:Good news! by millahtime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The prohibitive price is still a bottleneck for me though."

      Go price out a PC notebook with all the bells and whistles in an apple. then compare prices. The apple will be less expensive when it comes to bang for your buck.

    3. Re:Good news! by 1000101 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "The apple will be less expensive when it comes to bang for your buck"

      No it won't. It might be close, but the pc will be cheaper. Especially if you are a smart shopper and can take advantage of all the rebates that are offered on pc's.

    4. Re:Good news! by oscast · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not entierly true...

      On a PC... you can buy less and therefore pay less but that doesn't make it cheaper... but rather... more configurable.

      I've done these comparisons several times... and in every instance, at WORST the Mac comes out even. Rarely does it come out more expensive. With regard to laptops... Apple's laptops alwaays come out less expensive.

    5. Re:Good news! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Funny

      ``my little research indicated a superior battery life on Apple notebooks.

      The prohibitive price is still a bottleneck for me though.''

      Try finding a x86 laptop with similar battery life. Then talk to me about prohibitive prices.

      I was waiting for Apple to upgrade their iBook line, so I can get the old models cheaper. The timing is almost perfect, as my HP Pavilion N5415 died yesterday after a long period of increasing unusability. Heh, I would never have bought that one if the G3 iBooks had been available a month earlier. :-)

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    6. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I've never seen a PC laptop with comparable features.

      In order to consider buying a laptop, it must have:

      1. Both Firewire and USB ports. Firewire for the video camera, the iPod, and external drives, USB for hot-plugging a mouse when working at bigger desks, digital photos, and a few other things.

      2. Wireless networking without a flimsy plastic antenna sticking out of the PCMCIA slot.

      3. No second mouse button. When I use the Dell they gave me at work, I'm constantly right-clicking by mistake, because I don't like to look down and pay attention to which button I'm hitting. With the Mac, I just blindly stab the heel of my thumb anywhere below the touchpad to click on stuff. I can make OS X dance without contextual pop-up menus, but on the rare occasions I want to use one, my left pinky just rests on the control key when I'm clicking.

      Bluetooth is a "nice to have" as well.

    7. Re:Good news! by millahtime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have done the bang for your buck with comparisons and you get more with apple. You need to price them out as equal systems. Take a 15' powerpc and compare it to a top end speed PC laptop with dvd burner, dvd authoring software and all the other bells and whistles including bluetooth and the 54mbs wireless plus gigabit ethernet.

      You have to evaluate bang for your buck. Apple wins out there.

    8. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try finding a x86 laptop with similar battery life. Then talk to me about prohibitive prices.

      That was true 2-3 years ago, but not now. Thinkpad T40 and many other Centrino-based laptops get up to 7 hours of battery life, far more than any G4-based laptop.

    9. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn! A 15-foor PowerPC? Wow! Where can I get one? Can you imagine running Halo like that??

    10. Re:Good news! by Smitty825 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last Sept. I purchased a 15" Aluminum G4 Powerbook. I am very happy with my purchase, however, IMHO, the battery life is one of the least desirable points of that purchase. I was expecting 4 or so hours of battery life (like on the Titanium G4), but was disappointed to discover I only get between 2 to 3 on normal usage. Granted, everybody uses their machines differently, and this may or may not be a problem for you...

      --

      Doh!
    11. Re:Good news! by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go price out a PC notebook with all the bells and whistles in an apple.

      No, go price out a PC notebook with all the bells and whistles that you want. What if you don't need firewire? Most people don't. What if you don't need wi-fi? What if you do need a serial port? A parallel port? USB adapters don't solve these issues all the time either.

      The only time it makes sense to stuff a PC full of all the specific bells and whistles that an Apple comes with is A) for someone who needs the exact feature set of a mac but insists on buying a PC anyways, or B) those silly price comparisons that Mac zealots do.

    12. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Thinkpad T40 and many other Centrino-based laptops get up to 7 hours of battery life, far more than any G4-based laptop.
      Yes and no. With its standard 6-cell battery, the T40 gets about 4 hours of battery life, same as the 15" G4. And it weighs more or less the same: 5.4 pounds. And it's slower (1.6 Pentium M, rather slower than a 1.3 G4 in my experience, not to mention the new 1.5). And costs more to boot. To get 6.4 hours, you need to go with the considerably heavier (and more expensive) 9-cell battery.

      Apple's problem, IMHO, is that you can't get a bigger battery for their machines.

    13. Re:Good news! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too on a 17" G4 1GHz aluminum Powerbook. Battery life (naturally) sucks compared to my previous laptop, a G3/600 14" iBook. To make matters worse, I upgraded the hard drive from the supplied 4200RPM model to a 7200RPM 60GB Hitachi Travelstar... a very noticeable performance increase, an equally noticeable battery performance decrease, and it's much noisier now.

    14. Re:Good news! by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm typing this on a 1998 PowerBook (G3 300) with 10.3.2 installed with a little help from XPostFacto. And OS X has gotten faster with each successive release. Don't let the higher initial cost fool you; PowerBooks maintain their value for a long time. Check eBay and see how much my PB is going for these days; one sold the other day with specs similar to mine for ~$300. Not too bad 6 years later.

      And yes, I've said this before. No, I am not a karma whore. Yes, I want to change some perceptions regarding the Macintosh platform.

      (I should add that XPostFacto has broken a couple of things,

      (tig)

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    15. Re:Good news! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, go price out a PC notebook with all the bells and whistles that you want. What if you don't need firewire? Most people don't.

      Yeah, sure, most people have absolutely no need to use the most popular digital music player of the world.

    16. Re:Good news! by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK .. Now price the Dell with a 64 bit chip.

    17. Re:Good news! by raverbuzzy · · Score: 1

      There must be something wrong with my T40 but it only lasts about 3 hours, and thats on the High Battery Performance setting. Compared to my G4 powerbook which will often last twice that.

    18. Re:Good news! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dell: 533 MHz FSB
      Mac: 800 MHz FSB

      Dell: ATA/100
      Mac: SATA

      Dell: 100 Mbps Ethernet
      Mac: Gigabit Ethernet

      Also lacking in the Dell: ports for 802.11g and Bluetooth, FireWire 400 or 800, optical audio I/O ports, AGP 8X, and a capacity of 4 GB of RAM.

      You proved the poster's point: yes, you can build a PC that has fewer features and costs less than a Mac. But you can't find a PC that is feature-comparable to a Mac and yet costs significantly less.

      (The 1.6 GHz G5 is kind of a waste of money, anyway. It only has room for 4 GB of RAM as opposed to 8 GB in the other G5's, and it doesn't have PCI-X. The 1.8 GHz is a better value.)

      Your response here, based on the normal Slashdot way of doing things, should be something along the lines of, "Nobody needs FireWire anyway, 'cause USB is faster." Or something like that.

      --

      I write in my journal
    19. Re:Good news! by ithilienrp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait a second, I think the parent was talking about laptops, not desktops.

    20. Re:Good news! by kaden · · Score: 1
      Quote from the parent:

      I've done these comparisons several times... and in every instance, at WORST the Mac comes out even. Rarely does it come out more expensive. With regard to laptops... Apple's laptops alwaays come out less expensive.

    21. Re:Good news! by cosmo7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You forgot to yell "you kids get off my lawn".

    22. Re:Good news! by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      What software comes with that? Does it include any multimedia apps similar to the included iApps?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    23. Re:Good news! by Greg+Koenig · · Score: 2, Informative

      When you are running on battery, try turning the display brightness down to ~7-8 instead of running it at 10. To my eyes, the difference is not very perceptible, but the improvement in battery life is pretty big.

    24. Re:Good news! by magarity · · Score: 1

      3. No second mouse button

      No, no, no, the mouseclops is what kept me from buying any Apple product thus far. *shiver*

    25. Re:Good news! by wchin · · Score: 4, Informative
      Nobody NEEDS gigabit ethernet.

      Obviously to you, if you don't perceive a need for it, then nobody needs it.

      I don't know ANYONE who has a gigabit ethernet network.

      You don't get out much, do you? I know a number of people that have gigabit networks in their homes (including mine), much less at work. There are quite a few inexpensive gigabit ethernet switches on the market, including the NetGear GS108 (8 port) for $150 and the GS105 (5 port) for $80.

      With gigabit, I can do AFP or SMB transfers at over 50MB/sec which is a good 5x faster than a 100mb network to/from the network file server, and that is w/o jumbo packets.

      Even the slow ATA drive in laptop can push 20-30MB/sec, so network performance would benefit from gigabit over fast ethernet. Try pushing around some video clips and you'll appreciate the speed difference.

    26. Re:Good news! by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I don't see any 1.5 Ghz G4s on that page, perhaps you would like to find benches of 1.5s?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    27. Re:Good news! by TiMac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As for the FSB, the PC has a faster CPU anyway, so the FSB isn't going to catch the Mac up.

      Well, the fattest FSB pipe in the world won't make the CPU any faster...but having a smaller FSB will certainly constrain performance. So while it is arguable how much faster one chip or the other is, having a skinnier bus and slower HD, not to mention far slower I/O architecture, will more than likely make the PC slower, numbers be damned.

      --

    28. Re:Good news! by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Informative

      Psst.... should we tell him that Powerbooks [mine at least] measure brightness based on 16 rather than 10? Nahhh.....

      I do agree, though - I turn the brightess down a lot when I'm not plugged in; I've been sitting here about an hour on battery and I still have >65%.

    29. Re:Good news! by smc13 · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people who actually don't use their laptop to play or store music on. Also, the ipod will work with USB 2.

    30. Re:Good news! by gabebear · · Score: 4, Informative
      what laptop is this at that price? The warranty matters a lot on laptops. If I were buying a Dell laptop I would probably get the Inspiron 8600 (The whole 8000 line has been great).

      The 8600 configured as you speced, except for a 9600Pro w/ SXGA+ screen, and integrated bluetooth is $2,654(they are running a free dvd-burner pro-mo so this will be a little higher after wed). Buying your second stick of 512mb at crucial brings the price down to $2,509

      A Powerbook specced similarly, but with a G4 1.5Ghz, a 9700 w/ SXGA+ screen, and a 5400rpm drive is $2,999.00. Buying the second stick at crucial brings the price down to $2,829

      The powerbook costs $320 more, pretty close. A sale in the other direction could make the powerbook cheaper.

      I want a portable laptop, the 12" powerbook is considerably cheaper than a inspirion 300m, it also has more options.

    31. Re:Good news! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Could any (well, all) of those features not be compensated for with some of the $1,000+ one saves buying the PC?

      Sure. But in that case, you're not saving all of that money, are you? You're having to spend it to get what you want.

      As for the FSB, the PC has a faster CPU anyway, so the FSB isn't going to catch the Mac up.

      Uh... ;-)

      If things like 8X AGP are really worth $1,000 then buy the Mac. But I think it's a disservice to say Macs are a better value than PCs.

      When you buy a Mac, you generally get more stuff--more features, more software, the whole package--for the money. Therefore, by any objective measurement, the Mac is a better value, where value refers to amount of stuff obtained per dollar spent.

      --

      I write in my journal
    32. Re:Good news! by ted_nugent · · Score: 1

      In my experience (and I've owned a bunch of top tier PC laptops) the battery spec is never as advertised. It's usually a little over half. In the case of my last thinkpad, the battery life would drop to almost nothing after a year of use.

      So when I bought an ibook I expected to get the same thing. I'm happy to report that my 18 month old iBook still gets a good 4 hours of usable time, with only a slight degradation from the original ~4.5.

      --

      Free the West Memphis Three!

    33. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      there are number of distributors out there

      one with outstanding reputation http://www.powernotebooks.com/

      ok, i did cheat. add $500 for XPpro and a 3yr warranty.

      and you don't get any cool i-apps.

      but if we're talking strictly hardware, centrino w/radeon 9700(128mb version), dvd writer, 1024mb ram, 7200rpm drive...hovering just above $2k rocks.

      that said, i have a dell m60 already, so i'm eyeballing the 12" powerbook for portability.

    34. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Can't price a dell with one.

      But how about this:

      1.6Ghz Athlon64
      512MB DDR400 ram
      120 GB SATA
      GeForce 5700, 8x agp, VO
      Onboard gigabit ethernet

      $1049

      http://www.advantagepcinc.com/moreinfo.asp?iid=1 07 5
      First store I found selling Athlon64s on Google. Much lower price, much higher spec.

      Desktop Apples are expensive for the spec you get. Always have been, always will be. If what you're getting outside the spec (some people say ease of use, customer support, style, etc) is worth the difference, that's fine by me.

      To vaguely get back on topic, the price gap is much smaller for laptops.

    35. Re:Good news! by Silas+is+back · · Score: 2, Funny

      I totally agree with you concerning the prices of DESKTOP solutions. But when it comes to LAPTOPS, there are other rules.

      There's still no Laptop around that's as beautiful, small and lightweight as a PowerBook G4 AND has all the features and power.

      Displayhooks and other parts sticking out, blinking LEDs everywhere, 2cm empty space between lid- and display-edge, 2h battery-life, 4kg to carry around (1 of them for the superbig battery), CD/DVD-drives where you still need to be a _MAN_ to get the CD off of the rotor (ever heard of slot-loading?), strange "design"parts, awful colors, low-cost displays, ...
      maybe I picked the wrong laptop these days, but I'll never again give away my PowerBook! (hey, my keyboard glows!)

      --
      this sig is useless
    36. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Mac users (me in particular) don't admit we're paying a huge premium for the Mac brand name because, in fact, we're not."

      That's great and of course not. The valuation of what one purchases is very much subjective to the party involved. To you, it's not a huge premium, to others it is. There is no right or wrong in this case.

      "Anyone who believes a bottom of the line Dull is comparable to a Mac workstation deserves exactly what they get when buying said Dull."

      A spectacularly impressive argumentative tactic, taking the name of the particular company being argued against and turning it into name calling. This gives about as much credibility to your presentation as someone referring to Apple as Crapple or the Macintosh as the Crapintosh. Just wonderful.

      "You're comparing Apples with oranges (or better yet, Apples with crap)."

      I've worked with "crappy" Dells and Apples and great ones. It's true!

      "add in a OS to compare with OS/X (oops - there aren't any)"

      Wonderful. Continue the absurdity by stating that nothing compares to OS/X. Statements like this make a constructive, sensible debate impossible. You sir, are a wall.

      "and the other standard software packages (iTunes, iMovie, iDVD, etc., etc.)."

      It is wonderful that you like these and see value in them. That said, others do not. Like me for example. Don't care for any of them, particularly iTunes. But that is just my opinion, and in no way is a statement that you to must see it as I do.

      "Why can't PC bigots get over the fact that today's Macs are price competitive with PC's?"

      What is a PC bigot exactly? A person who sees things differently is a bigot? Here in Canada, Macs are, in my humble opinion, very much competitive with PCs in the laptop area and yet bigot that I am, I still prefer the PC and one of the factors is price, and the other is features. Having said that, other opinions are welcome and not judged, unless of course they offered in oh you unholy unwashed masses sense. Let's take a look at an example or two shall we?

      The 17" Powerbook is $3,699.

      The 17" Toshiba Satellite P20 is $3499.

      Features vary, such a RAM, Firewire ports, etc. but its all down to which one you like better. What's your name for Toshiba? Toshita?

      Now as for desktops, I recently upgraded to a P4 2.8Ghz with a Gig of RAM, 800MHz FSB, 36 GIG SATA, Pioneer 107 DVD-R+R, ATI 9600, 120 GIG ATA second drive, new case, external drive enclosure for the CD-ROM, external drive enclosure for a third Hard-Drive (ATA - 80 gig) for $1800.

      I can pick up a PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz (I know, the speed varies across platforms and OS's) for a mere $2499! I find the PC in this case to be a far better deal in this case. Does this make me a PC bigot? Does recommending the new eMac to a client who personally finds using Macs easier make me a bigot as well? My god, just the other day I was praising InDesign and talking about its advantages over Quark (I didn't say Quirk however). I must be an Adobe bigot! Oh the humanity. When will this rampant platformism ever stop?

      Very peculiar. Do people actually see other people as defined by their computer system? Are there millions of PC people out there? What sort of clothes do they where? What strange foods do they eat?

    37. Re:Good news! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a lot of people who actually don't use their laptop to play or store music on.

      Since quite a long time Apple tends to offer laptops that can be your primary computer - not just an add-on to a beige-box under the desk. For an iBook/powerbook user there is no question "why store your music/digital photos/digital movies on your laptop?" - their answer is WHY NOT, ACTUALLY? Try it, and you'll think of returning to the old days of separate desktop/notebook as of moving back to your parents.

    38. Re:Good news! by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second this. I bought a 12" 867Mhz Aluminum Powerbook last year. The Apple website boasted 5 hours battery life.... I'm lucky to see 2 1/2 doing nothing but browsing the web with the screen at the lowest brightness.

      Meanwhile, my boss on his 14" Dell Pentium-M can sit through a 4 hour meeting typing away the whole time while on the wireless network without powering down.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    39. Re:Good news! by The+Unabageler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My friend got a dell and started boasting about his 7 hour battery life.

      later on he mentioned that it's only with the second battery plugged in. lame.

      --
      perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
    40. Re:Good news! by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1


      because I don't like to look down and pay attention to which button I'm hitting

      I'm glad I'm not as stupid as you are. That must really suck.

      Not as much as having to look down at the keyboard when I type. I'm glad I'm not as inept as you are. That must really suck.

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    41. Re:Good news! by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      No, no, no, the mouseclops is what kept me from buying any Apple product thus far. *shiver*

      Um, I'm using a Microsoft Wheel Mouse Optical right now on my PowerBook. Worked right out of the box, no additional software required, unless you want to assign special functions to the buttons/wheel. And then, I recommend spending a couple of bucks on USB Overdrive instead of installing MS drivers.

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    42. Re:Good news! by aastanna · · Score: 1

      Not mentioned in the write-up, but the laptops now come with airport extreme (802.11g) standard. That's like a $80 price drop, since many people will be buying that card. I'm typing this on a first generation 12" powerbook where I had to pay for the card, and the processor is 866MHz compared to the 1.3 GHz. Plus, the operating system has upgraded, and the price has dropped.

      My 12" works fine for me for light programming and general computer use (email, IM, bittorrent, music, news feeds). With the price drop and feature upgrade it's a really good deal.

    43. Re:Good news! by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      dvd authoring software


      I don't do DVD-authoring, so that has exactly zero value-added benefit for me.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    44. Re:Good news! by plj · · Score: 1

      >7 hours probably assumes that you've replaced the optical drive with extra battery. In most x86 laptops you can do that, but in Macs you can't, as the drive is not in modular bay. This is the single thing that most sucks in my 12" PowerBook - if I would be able to replace the mostly useless optical drive with another battery, the battery life of my box would likely exceed 8 hours.

      But the problem is, that a T40 with the same features than my PBook has would probably cost 500 euros more than that...

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    45. Re:Good news! by univgeek · · Score: 1

      The battery on the powerbook is hotswappable - close the book, let it go to sleep, turnit over, swap the batteries.

      open the book, and you are ready to go!!

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    46. Re:Good news! by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      Still vapour, but in a month you can get one here.

    47. Re:Good news! by jovlinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      value is calculated as ultility / cost.

      The key is that utility is a function of desired quality.

      For me, for example, 3d acceleration has zero utility, while an extremely high-res (I'm eyeing the dell laptop w/ 1920x1200 @17") LCD has a very high utility. Likewise, I prefer MB over MHz, and low weight over internal optical drives.

      I think many people who object to apple's prices do so because you may get a lot for your money, but you may not WANT half of it.

    48. Re:Good news! by Sparks23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is partly true, and partly not. My Powerbook G4 is, hands-down, the most expensive piece of computer equipment I have ever bought. I really can't get around that fact in any way, shape or form; it cost as much as my last two desktop PCs put together, and cost more than the Sony Vaio laptop I had gotten some years ago. I can't really cushion that reality. :)

      However, my Powerbook is buff enough to work as a desktop if I want it to, and what I've found is that overall I've had a lot less to spend on software for the Mac. For instance, I wanted to get into doing some experimenting with hobbyist moviemaking. Apple's iLife provided me a movie capture and editing tool (iMovie), a DVD authoring tool (iDVD) which works with my Powerbook's DVD drive, and a very nice musical composition program (Garage Band) for $40. Now, none of those programs are the best-of-breed; just within the Mac world, iMovie is flattened features-wise by Apple's own Final Cut Pro, iDVD is flattened by Apple's DVD Studio Pro, and Garage Band is basically Soundtrack's little brother.

      However, all of them are more than sufficient for a home user's needs, and pricing comparitive packages for my PC got really expensive really quickly; to find a decent musical composition program which had Garage Band's features for the PC, I had to go up to $90. Which, no, is not that expensive as composition software goes... but does seem a bit pricy compared to $40 for the entire iLife package.

      I could give other examples, but suffice it to say that /in general/ I've found that software -- especially writing, media composition or digital editing software -- has been cheaper on my Mac than my PC. As a result, I've personally found that now that I own the Mac, it's been cheaper to keep it running.

      --
      --Rachel
    49. Re:Good news! by Sparks23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I really hate trying to compare Mac and PC CPU speeds, since -- as you correctly note -- the differing architecture makes the speeds comparitively meaningless; my 1Ghz Powerbook runs as fast or faster than my 1.8Ghz Pentium 4 desktop, so I gave up on trying to make the clock speeds map in comparison in any meaningful way.

      What really makes more sense is to compare what you're trying to do with the computer, and what will work best for you.

      For instance, I find my Powerbook is much easier to write on; for whatever reason, Microsoft Office X for the Mac seems cleaner and less clunky than Office XP on my desktop. I also find my Mac is generally easier to do my UNIX development on since I have X11 and gcc right there, and it's a BSD system under the hood. Similarly, playing with music composition and digital editing seem to be easier on my Mac. With the digital audio output, my Powerbook makes a better stereo/DVD player for me in my room as well. I also like that it has great battery life, so I can pop it onto 802.11b mode, and wander around the house with it; it's nice to be able to have the Mac there to look up recipes on wirelessly, or to work on my writing (stored on a network file share) in the kitchen while cooking.

      On the other hand, 3D gaming is definitely easier on my Windows box. And I find, for whatever reason, that my Windows box works better for me when I'm doing website dev; probably because I have Opera, IE and Mozilla installed, because I tend to work best in JASC Paint Shop Pro for doing web graphics, and because I find Evrsoft's 1stPage the best 'notepad on steroids' solution for HTML editing, even if it's defunct and no longer supported. And obviously, doing any sort of Windows development is way easier on my PC desktop than my Powerbook!

      Does this make one or the other of them better? Not really. I admit I tend to prefer my Mac lately simply because it seems to run faster/smoother for me, and I've been doing a lot of writing. But my PC gets a lot of daily use as well.

      Sure, I could've gotten a 'faster' Windows laptop than my Powerbook. But a six-pound little slim thing with 1 gig of RAM, built-in wireless and firewire, and suchnot is not to be sneezed at. I find the large, crisp screen works well for me when I'm traveling and when I'm writing. To /me/, the money I spent on the Powerbook was worth it and it's a better solution than a laptop PC would've been.

      That doesn't mean that's true for everyone else. :)

      --
      --Rachel
    50. Re:Good news! by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      You can always go to a friend who's either a teacher or a parent with a child either in K-12 or college... educators and educatees get one discounted major hardware purchase (usually around $200 off) per year

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    51. Re:Good news! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      It's striking a balance. I got a Power Mac G4 as a graduation gift and it lasted me through college. I didn't use the firewire at first. I didn't use the airport card slot at first. I didn't use the PCI slots at first. But when I did need them, they were really handy. It's been four years and I still have it, though I'm definitely going to pick up one of these new 15" Powerbooks, and maybe a 12" for the little woman. And I won't have a problem taking out a loan for them, because I know they'll last for 60 months.

      Shelling out 3 grand for a peecee is idiotic because you'll just get a new one once it breaks, but I'm pretty sure my $1500 Power Mac will be running when my kids are graduating high school.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    52. Re:Good news! by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some people just look at price alone and nothing else. Try doing video editing an a PC laptop and you'll understand why people get Mac laptops for video work.

    53. Re:Good news! by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      I think many people who object to apple's prices do so because you may get a lot for your money, but you may not WANT half of it.

      Soet of like Windows, right? It comes with a ton of 'features', most of which I don't want.

      Granted, my iBook came with some software I could live without (for exapmple: Garage Band, I'm not a mucisian); but most of the other porgrams do me just fine, and a lot better than the crap Microsoft integrates into Windows to expand their monopoly. iChat AV, Safari, Mail, iPhoto, iTunes, iMovie, etc. are all things I like, even if I barely ever touch iMovie. And I still downloaded Firefox to this iBook as well.

      Now, as for the hardware, well, I got a lot for my money with the Airport Extreme card (antenna built into the iBook, no need for a card with an antenna sticking out) and 512 MB extra RAM added in. The hardware runs smoothly and efficiently. Remmeber the Mac saying: "It just works."

    54. Re:Good news! by nuggetman · · Score: 2

      I have no need for Firewire or Bluetooth.

      And 3 years ago, you had no need for that 20 gig drive, you were never going to fill that whole thing up.

      You probably also had no USB, after all there were no major USB devices out there.

      I don't need DVD authoring. A DVD burner without a reader is useless to me.

      Erm... you are aware that the DVD burner also READS DVDs and CDs, right? And that the OS comes with a DVD player built in?

      iTunes? I've got Winamp. It's free.
      So's iTunes

      Apple is designed for those with a LOT of disposable income and the hardcore geek.

      You missed one. I'm going to a school for radio/tv/film, an industry (and university, Rowan) that is mostly Mac-based (yes PCs are starting to slip in but the Mac's are still in force)

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    55. Re:Good news! by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      bullshit... sorry... last week I was doing very simple putty + pgadminIII (dreamweaver minimized & out of the way) on an HP Pavillon Centrino. Yeah, slickish laptop, people showed it off like "see... it's as neat as your Ti pb..." (sorry folks), yeah 5 hrs battery life... shame that the GUI was left chasing my input when I started designing a database over the two swares mentioned... I know Windows XP against Panther isn't exactlty fair... I know I shound have tried it with gentoo installed but: I bought a mac because I wanted an UNIX laptop without hassles. It's NOT linux's fault, by all means... its those damn hw vendors jamming shitty nics in 1400+ EUR machines with bug ridden acpi bioses... and not providing supported quality drivers for the platform I... let me stress it... *I*, the customer (and not fscking "consumer"), want to buy.
      IBM, you lost a laptop sell you know? I'd have bought a Think had it run linux as a pb runs Os X. Now... back to Apple HW... you get what you pay for... Apple is expensive but it's solid, cool and even old designs can whip out better overall performance than recent centrino machines... out of the box... it matters sometimes...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    56. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On OS X, 3D acceleration is used for the 2D display as a part of Quartz Extreme. This means that 3D acceleration might be of zero utility to a PC user but its used at the system level on a Mac. Besides, what AGP video card are you going to buy that doesn't feature 3D acceleration?

      As for low weight and no optical drive, afaik every 17" notebook you buy will have an optical drive. Only the tiny sub-notebooks are CD/DVD-less.

      IMHO, the biggest difference is what OS you intend to run. I would NEVER consider a PC notebook because they don't run OS X.

    57. Re:Good news! by gabebear · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but if we're talking strictly hardware

      Sure, but that's silly, these are laptops.

      I think a 7200 rpm drive is a mistake, if you want a fast drive you can pick up a 5400rpm travelstar drive with a higher capacity and a 8MB cache. The higher density will make the drive faster without killing your battery and keeps your lap cooler. 7200rpm is damn fast, but not worth the power it uses.

    58. Re:Good news! by MrBlackBand · · Score: 1
      "Nobody NEEDS gigabit ethernet."

      "Nobody NEEDS Firewire ports."
      "Nobody NEEDS USB."
      "640k ought to be enough for anyone."*
      "Why would any normal person want a computer?"

      *Yes, yes, I know he never said that.

      --
      "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it."
    59. Re:Good news! by plj · · Score: 1

      Now this is news. I thought it would have had to be plugged to charger for this to be possible. Well, better than nothing, although separate spare batteries are still not very good solution IMO.

      Btw, do you have any idea how long it can maintain the sleep when neither of the batteries are in their place during the change...?

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    60. Re:Good news! by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      A few months ago I really surprised myself by purchasing an iBook. Just thought it was a good bang for my buck (other posters here on /. have echoed that sediment). This was my first MAC ever, and I will say that I was pleasantly surprised. OSX is really quite good. And while I won't make blanketed statements saying that "nothing compares to OS/X" (comparing oranges to apples IMO), I can easily understand the reasoning behind that claim. The Expose feature is my favorite. I can't tell you how many times I've inadvertently pressed that F9 key on my Windows Desktop. If you get a chance, try working on a Mac for an extended period of time. You might, and I did, find yourself surprised.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    61. Re:Good news! by CatOne · · Score: 1

      People who have iPods DO need firewire. And these days, judging from the sales, that's JUST ABOUT EVERYBODY. ;-)

    62. Re:Good news! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must be some new kind of bigot! You're bigoted against rampant platformism!

      Seriously though it's never going to end. It's not just an argument or a debate to these people who can't see the merits of both systems. It's a holy war.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    63. Re:Good news! by Wicksta · · Score: 2, Funny

      "You don't get out much, do you? I know a number of people that have gigabit networks in their homes (including mine), much less at work."

      And you say *he* doesn't get out much?

    64. Re:Good news! by mlilback · · Score: 1
      No parallel or serial port? That means I'd have to throw out all of my hardware and buy new stuff.
      You should have thrown it out a long time ago. Serial ports became outdated, what, 5-6 years ago? And you expect a new computer to support such outdated technology? I find it a lot more offensive to pay for old features I know I'll never use than for new features I might use.

      I don't know any mac user w/o a firewire device (and I know lots of mac users, as I refuse to help anyone with Windows). Most have multiple (iPods, iSight/web cam, removable/backup drives, extra hard drives, camcorders). If you don't need dvd authoring, then get a model with a combo drive. The new powerbooks are the first model with standard bluetooth. When you bought it as an option, Apple's marked up price was $40. Since it is built-in, I'm sure at most it raises the price by $5. Wahh, $5 is so fucking much....

      I've got 4 firewire and 4 USB devices I use on my powerbook. My dad has at least that many (and he's retired and not a tech geek). My sister (who never had a computer until I bought her an iMac a few years ago) has multiple firewire and usb devices and she's a non-geek house-mom without a LOT of disposble income.

      If all you want is a cheap piece of shit, then go buy one. But most mac users end up buying firewire, usb, and bluetooth devices because their computers support those connections. And they are much better off as a result.

      My 8 year-old niece made a video for a class project, edited it with iMovie, and burned to a DVD with iDVD. My sister & brother-in-law would have said they had no need for a DVD burner or firewire, but my niece learned a lot, really enjoyed filming a boring school report, earned an A+,and impressed the hell out of her parents, teachers, classmates, and me.

      My mom loved the fact that last christmas I hooked up her camcorder to my powerbook, digitized some old home movies whose video tapes were nearing the end of their lifetime, and burned them to DVD. I had no experience with video editing, camcorders, or DVD burning before that, but that was more than worth the price of my computer (especially since some were priceless vidoes of my brother who died 13 years ago.)

      Apple computers empower you to do things you never would have thought of doing. Maybe you "think" you don't need those features, but most home consumers could certainly learn to use them. Users never know what they really need (ask anyone who does custom software development), but when given options, they end up doing things they never imagined.

      And remember, USB would be nowhere without Apple. Firewire would be nowhere without Apple. WiFi would be nowhere without Apple. In a few years, it will probably be the same with bluetooth.

    65. Re:Good news! by damiam · · Score: 1

      The reason why laptops have mice built in is that sometimes you can't use an external mouse.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    66. Re:Good news! by damiam · · Score: 1

      That's right, most people don't. I don't know where you've been, but the majority of the American public does not own an iPod. Maybe 1% have an MP3 player of any sort.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    67. Re:Good news! by raverbuzzy · · Score: 1

      I think its about 4 minutes, but i don't want to test it. It's seriously cool though, I show it off a lot to people with pc laptops.

    68. Re:Good news! by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      The key problem with those comparos is what does the user want? You can say something is a great value, but unwanted features don't really give you any value do they? There are users that have no use for Wi-Fi. There are others that have no desire for DVD burning ability.

      I personally have no other bluetooth hardware, and it's not looking likely as the cell phone market in the US sucks for such things, especially considering I refuse to spend $200 on a new phone when I can get one for free that makes phone calls just as well.

      Wasted features have no inherent value for the user who does not want them, and so do not contribute to the value of a computer.

      Not that I don't want a G4, because I do. ;)

      --
      ± 29 dB
    69. Re:Good news! by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The Powerbook is the only laptop I would even think of buying. It allows me if I even wanted to, to run either OS X or Linux, though personally I'd only run OS X on it.

      On the other hand, why would anyone would want to develop Web Sites using XP is beyond me. After first going from NeXTSTEP to NT4/2k/XP than recently to Debian Linux (2 years and counting) and finally getting to work back with OS X it is clear to me with regard to computer efficiency:
      • XP is out. Configuring Apache2 with mods on Linux and OS X is painless and a refreshing experience, along side dealing with Tomcat/JBoss, etc.
      • Writing XHTML/XML/XSLT/CSS using say Kate via KDE 3.2.2alpha or with Quantra is a pleasurethe apps are non-intrusive and years of knowing the meta languages means you aren't slowed down by WYSIWYG
      • Publishing Book Quality documentation and then ripping it to DVI/PS/PDF using LaTeX via LyX or Kile LaTeX Editor puts large document publishing on Windows to Shame (OS X is just as painless doing LaTeX as Linux). LyX on XP run through Cygwin is thankfully available but definitely not a first class citizen, as well as TeX/LaTeX/TeTeX/Ghostscript/DVI, etc.
      • Developing Java/Objective-C are both enjoyable on Linux and clearly more on OS X due to Apple's commitment to Engineering OOA/OOD APIs that have made Sun's Java easier than programming on Sun's Tools.
      • Shell ProgrammingCygwin is nice but not seemless
      • Database development say with MySQL and PostgreSQL besides the obvious Oracle, DB2, Informix and Sybase are much more pleasant at home on UNIX systems.

      I spend about 2% of my time playing games, if that. There are only so many first person shooter games one can play before reverting back to old fashioned Card Games and Chess.

      From the look of my reply I take more time in well-formatted documentation than most I'm sure.

    70. Re:Good news! by isellmacs · · Score: 1, Informative
      Dell: 533 MHz FSB
      Mac: 800 MHz FSB

      Uh, you do know that P4 had 800 FSB long before the G5 was even announced, much less actually shipped?

      Dell: ATA/100
      Mac: SATA

      Same chipset that has 800FSB (canterwood or springdale) also has SATA. Once again, before the G5 was paper-launched. Oh, and thats 2 SATA + 2 PATA/100 + Optional SATA RAID + Optional PATA Raid. And the chassis will have room for more than 2 hard drives.

      Dell: 100 Mbps Ethernet
      Mac: Gigabit Ethernet

      Hmm... I wonder if the G5 uses INTEL 1000PRO that apple normally uses. Once again, Gigabit LAN is quite standard on most 800FSB systems. Some of them even have dual LAN, though usually only one is Giga, while the other is 10/100.

      Also lacking in the Dell: ports for 802.11g and Bluetooth, FireWire 400 or 800, optical audio I/O ports, AGP 8X, and a capacity of 4 GB of RAM.

      Most PC desktops do indeed lackwireless. It's something most useful for notebooks, as most desktops are cabled in. Bluetooth, a technology 10 years old, is also possible on a CTO only, but again, not really needed anyway. Firewire 400 is common on 800FSB chipsets, though it doesn't have 800 (which came out after the 800FSB chips were) Optical I/O ports are, again, part of the 875 chipset package, as is 8x AGP and the capacity for 4GB of dual-DDR400 RAM.

      You proved the poster's point: yes, you can build a PC that has fewer features and costs less than a Mac. But you can't find a PC that is feature-comparable to a Mac and yet costs significantly less.

      You can also build a PC that has MORE features and STILL costs less than a Mac. I can indeed not only find a PC that has comparable features and costs less, but I can and HAVE built and sold them personally.

      A good P4 whitebox built by any local shop worth it's salt can totally destroy a G5 given the same budget. With the amount of budget you would spend even on a 1.6 G5, you can totally deck out a system with a nice case and all the eye candy.

      I am guessing you took your specs from the original G5 vs Dell that apple released. The one that featured a dell based on Year-Old technology, vs a G5 that wouldn't hit the stores until like six months later.

    71. Re:Good news! by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      I'm not exactly sure what qualifies as good battery life, but I don't think my PB 12" does *great* in that department. It gets 3 hours, max. Is that good? (Honest question)

      Many of my PC friends can destroy that, but as someone said below, they have 2 batteries and a tank of a laptop twice as thick as mine.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    72. Re:Good news! by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      And it's slower (1.6 Pentium M, rather slower than a 1.3 G4 in my experience, not to mention the new 1.5).

      By which experience is that ? Mhz for Mhz, the Pentium M compares quite favourably to the G4 - a top end 1.7Ghz Pentium M should be about the same speed as a 1.5Ghz G4.

    73. Re:Good news! by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      Good point. Consider me chided.

      (tig)

      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    74. Re:Good news! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
      And 3 years ago, you had no need for that 20 gig drive, you were never going to fill that whole thing up.

      His sig links to a porn site. I bet he had no problems filling that 20 gig hard drive even then....

    75. Re:Good news! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 1

      Uh, you do know that P4 had 800 FSB long before the G5 was even announced, much less actually shipped?

      Then it should be no problem to find a competitively priced Dell with a comparable system bus.

      You can also build a PC that has MORE features and STILL costs less than a Mac.

      Find one, please.

      A good P4 whitebox built by any local shop

      Er, no thanks. I'm looking for something with a parts-and-labor warranty.

      --

      I write in my journal
    76. Re:Good news! by MrChuck · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Um, usb2 and firewire are both well faster than any 7200 RPM drive will put out (around 7MB/s in real use. dd does not count as "real use".)

      So it becomes moot.

      However when Apple introduced the iMac with USB and firewire, but no SCSI or ADB - meaning those of us who had spent money with Apple and their partners for parts were SOL. Apple has a long habit of burning loyal users.

      Cracks in the case? Cosmetic, not covered underwarrantee (lemme tell you how good that laptop looks with epoxy holding the crack that extended from going further).

      From the start of the mac, they've done this (which was odd given that they committed to open at the start and that Apple ][ cards worked in ][+ and ][e and even /// machines - they even were a big cause of IBM (of all companies) "inventing" the personal computer and using non-IBM parts - and being fairly Open such that all those machines you have are derived from PC clones)). With mac they went closed and proprietary.

      Got a trackball for your Mac 512? Maybe a less painful keyboard? Sorry, we have ADB now.
      Mac SE cards? Sorry, the new SE uses a different buss.
      I'll just touch on iPod schemes for charging them and talking to them. The Firewire cable is simple and worked. Now I have (another) proprietary dock cable thingy to deal with. Nice "improvment."
      Own a SCSI scanner, drive, tape? Yeah, we're using Firewire. No transistion machines. Sorry.

      The day that Apple introduced the iMac, I was down the street earlier that day looking at a Compaq PC. It had USB and Firewire and IDE and PS/2 connectors and serial ports. I could run a USB keyboard and a legacy trackball. With the iMac, I could run their crap keyboard and hope drivers for other things might be available. Transition is useful (surprisingly, firewire-2 works with old firewire. That's a break from their habit).

      Feature for feature matching is only useful if you want those features.

      Is GigE really necessary for most of us? It's cool, but my servers have GigE and use it, my desktops and laptops don't. So knock that off the comparison chart.

      64bit? Hate to break it, but OS 10.3 isn't 64 bit. So the G5's only fully used by, er, Linux.

      Look, if the choice is a machine running Windows or a machine running MacOS then, if you can get the apps you want, the mac is cheaper. You're not spending forever screwing around supporting and restoring the machine. My mom got a mac because I won't help her with Windows (it's like AlAnon).

      OTOH, if the choice is an x86 box running *nix vs. a Mac, then the PC is cheaper by a chunk. An older 266MHz pentium with 128MB of RAM running fvwm SMOKES the G4 Tibook with 768MB of RAM. THe Terminal App leaves a huge memory footprint. Aqua is sluggish and fat. Making X11 look not-fat is a feat! Sure, at several typical end user things it's a much better machine. But really, I read mail, browse, and user terminals 90% of the time.

      At work, there's a Mac and a WIndows box. The Windows box is used only for Notes and a trouble ticket system for which I have no choice. The Mac is a Lombard with 2 heads (LCD and a monitor) for everything else.

      Bizarrely, I find myself using Windows for OpenOffice - because the 400MHz Mac with 256MB of RAM running firefox and terminal starts swapping (1GB of swap in use!) when I start up XWindows. Forget mail.app (I'm happy with mutt and IMAP) or iChat, terminal + X + browser kills a Mac.

      so when you price compare
      double the ram in the Mac, leave the PC alone for Unix and compare $2400 to $800 for a laptop configured to run your stuff. Linux runs GREAT on an $800 laptop. And on a $300 desktop system.

      What's Apple's < $1000 desktop system? Oh, an eMac with a built in monitor. Gimme that for $500 without the damn monitor (17" monitors are free and there are plenty around to be had) and we can talk.

      Oh, you'd better buy Office, because

    77. Re:Good news! by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      I can pick up a PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz (I know, the speed varies across platforms and OS's) for a mere $2499! I find the PC in this case to be a far better deal in this case. Does this make me a PC bigot?

      No, it makes you a moron. Of course, that's what you get for paying $700 over list price on the 1.6 GHz PowerMac

    78. Re:Good news! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      I can pick up a PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz (I know, the speed varies across platforms and OS's) for a mere $2499!

      At the Apple store, the PowerMac G5 1.6 Ghz starts at "$1799."

    79. Re:Good news! by HitByASquirrel · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree, Apple Powerbooks DO last a very long time, right now I am on my Pismo (Powerbook G3) from spring 2000. Since I bought it, its grown from a 400MHz G3 / 128 MB RAM / 12 GB HD to a 500MHz G4 / 1GB of RAM / 80 GB HD, and it still holds 10 hours of charge with dual batteries.

      Right now I'm running OS X 10.3.3, and it HAS been getting faster with every update.

      And I plan on using it for another four years.

    80. Re:Good news! by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      Gentoo (i believe) has a fully 64 bit linux flavor for the g5. but i've yet to go out and dual boot my g5 yet.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    81. Re:Good news! by name773 · · Score: 1

      my dad has an ibook g3 that he uses to write down the minutes of a meeting or give a presentation (the video out on that thing works amazingly well). he has no firewire devices.

    82. Re:Good news! by name773 · · Score: 1

      you don't need a computer either.

    83. Re:Good news! by harikiri · · Score: 1

      The current prices are not prohibitive by any means, at least for the Australian store.

      I recently priced a 12" 1Ghz powerbook model:

      $AUD 2999 for the base system:
      - 1Ghz G4 processor
      - 256MB RAM
      - 30GB HDD
      - 32MB video card
      - Airport (wireless) ready
      - Bluetooth
      - Firewire 400

      Now, about a month later:
      $AUD 2600 12" 1.33Ghz powerbook: -- price drop $400
      - 1.33Ghz G4 processory -- increased
      - 256MB system memory
      - 60GB HDD -- doubled
      - 64MB video card -- doubled
      - Airport built-in -- added by default
      - Bluetooth

      All this for $AUD 400 cheaper!!!

      I ended up getting my powerbook off ebay (12" 1Ghz, 512MB RAM, Airport, Applecare warranty) for $AUD 2800. Can you imagine how shirty I am right now?

      Interestingly enough, a local Mac magazine recently compared US prices for a 15" powerbook (previous model) to the local price. Due to the markup that Apple had centrally decided upon at Cupertino, it was cheaper for an Australian to book a return ticket to Hawaii, spend a few nights there, drop into the local Apple store and purchase the powerbook, and still come back with money to spare - than to purchase the same model locally!

      So for all I know, Apple may have simply made their markups or prices a little more realistic for us non-US folks.

      Anyone know if you can "trade-up" your old powerbooks? I'd sorely like to get a new one now, only had this for 3 weeks!

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    84. Re:Good news! by The+Infamous+Grimace · · Score: 1

      Just as a side note, the same can be said of my Compaq Armada 1750, which despite being pentium 2 has to be the most durable laptop I've ever seen.

      Very interesting. I've asked before for examples from the WinTel world of this type of longevity, and I appreciate your response. I imagine you would agree that these older laptops, while not something you want to compile large projects or do vid editing on, have a useful life that is far longer than one might expect.

      (tig)
      --
      Ignorance and prejudice and fear
      Walk hand in hand
    85. Re:Good news! by mikis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Something like Dell Dimension XPS? You get 3.2GHz PIV (with 800MHz FSB), 2GB RAM, 120GB SATA HDD, Gigabit Ethernet, SB Audigy 2 sound (with Firewire), ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB (which thrashes NV FX 5200) AND 17" TFT -- all for 50$ less than quoted Mac.

      Now, let's add XP Professional instead of Home, Microsoft Digital Media Edition Plus! Pack (not even close to Apple's offer, but for the sake of comparision), 8x DVD+RW drive, 56K modem and we come to $2039.

      But let's not even try to add all this options to Mac -- 2GB RAM alone costs $825! Plus 350$ for Radeon 9800 Pro and 699$ for 17" Studio Display and we get $3373!

      Or, you want 64bit PC? Lets try with Alienware Aurora: AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 512MB RAM, 80GB HDD, NV FX5200 Ultra, 80GB SATA HDD, Plextor 8x DVD+-RW Drive, Audigy 2, Gigabit Ethernet, USB 2.0, Firewire: $1760

      Sorry, but there is no way that Mac is cheaper (or even close) to comparable PC. And mind you, I chose two of the most expensive PC vendors.

    86. Re:Good news! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      And I have no need for a A20 gate. All PC notebooks are thus overpriced. QED

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    87. Re:Good news! by Gorbag · · Score: 1

      I think the Dell's 533 MHz FSB is 32 bit as well, while the Mac's 800 MHz FSB is 64 bit, no? That's a big bandwidth difference.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself
    88. Re:Good news! by plj · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea, to which models it applies to? I just tested it with my 1st generation (no DVI) 12-inch PowerBook; I put it to sleep (lid down), and removed the battery... only for 10 seconds or so, but off it went, and instantly. So, did not work here... :-(

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    89. Re:Good news! by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      I know there are x86 laptops that have good battery life; but I claim that they can't match the Apples in price. The T40 you mentioned costs ~1600 USD. That's significantly more than the ~1000 an iBook costs, and I don't know if the T40 actually lives up to the advertised battery life. Also, I wouldn't consider 7 hours ``far more'' than 6.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    90. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      "What really makes more sense is to compare what you're trying to do with the computer, and what will work best for you." Of course. "For instance, I find my Powerbook is much easier to write on; for whatever reason, Microsoft Office X for the Mac seems cleaner and less clunky than Office XP on my desktop." I can't stand either version of Office on either platform so I use InDesign on my PC. "Mac is generally easier to do my UNIX development on since I have X11 and gcc right there, and it's a BSD system under the hood." Absolutely. I don't do any Unix development so this would not be a factor for me. "Similarly, playing with music composition and digital editing seem to be easier on my Mac." That's great. I find it easier on my PC with the Sonic Foundry now Sony packages. To each his own. "Sure, I could've gotten a 'faster' Windows laptop than my Powerbook. But a six-pound little slim thing with 1 gig of RAM, built-in wireless and firewire, and suchnot is not to be sneezed at." No it's not, but in so stating it's not necessary to sneeze back... as in Dull...

    91. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      "No, it makes you a moron. Of course, that's what you get for paying $700 over list price on the 1.6 GHz PowerMac."

      A moron eh? You must have missed it when I said, "here in Canada". Let me explain something to you. Various countries use different currencies. In this example, Canada uses Canadian currency in which the prices listed at www.apple.ca are in. At www.apple.com the listed prices are in U.S. currency.

      Now, let me introduce you to the concept of currency conversion. When comparing one currency to another, often their value differs so that one (or 1 if that works better for you) Canadian dollar is not equivalent in value to one (1) U.S. dollar. In fact, it usually has a lower comparitive value. Thus, when something is listed at say, $1000 USD, the converted price in Canadian dollars might be something like $1351.75. Visit www.xe.com to view a real-time example.

      Now if you could help me to be no longer a moron how else would I have qualified the prices without stating "here in Canada"? Please. I really do need your help.

    92. Re:Good news! by Sparks23 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't the one who made the 'Dull' comments, FWIW; please don't make it sound like I was the one being condescending earlier. My point was just that the best platform for an individual varies depending on their needs and preferences, and that whether something is 'too expensive' or not depends on what someone's needs and preferences are. Which you seem to agree with. Yay, agreement! And on Slashdot, who'd think it? ;)

      You find InDesign works better for you; hey, great, I admit I haven't tried that one. I have Sony's Foundry stuff on my desktop, and I find Garage Band works better for me because I need better MIDI than Foundry has. We each found what worked well for us. As you said, to each his (or her) own.

      --
      --Rachel
    93. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      "You are posting on an American web site. Slashdot is based in the US. When you use the $ symbol on an American web site, people are bound to assume you are talking about real money, not Canadian dolars."

      Ok then. I will never again include the qualified statement, "Here in Canada" again. It just doesn't make any sense does it? I am at a loss however, how to state that the prices I referred to are in Canadian dollars (which is also prefaced by the $ symbol) after having made a statement like "Here in Canada." Having made that statement, Am I to assume then that persons on /. are illiterate and will not understand that a statement like "Here in Canada" previous to quoting a number of prices will not be understood. I'm truly sorry but I give /. readers more credit. It's a problem I have, I know.

      What do you suggest? Am I to assume that people will not read my post and respond to it anyway? If so then how do I make it clear that my post and therefore the prices therein refer to Canadian dollars by not saying "Here in Canada"? Why would I even write any dollar amounts in the post if it's going to be responded to without reading it and furthermore, not comprehending it?

      In fact, I made the statement "Here in Canada" to make it clear that I was referring to the situation in, guess what, Canada! Am I to assume that even said it will be ignored. Are all those who do not dwell in the States unwelcome here or something? Do people still believe that even though a site is based in the United States persons from other countries might peruse and contribute to it and even have the gaul to qualify their remarks with a statement like "Here in Canada" to make it clear that the situation being referred to is not, as is fairly assumed, in the United States, but in another country? In this case, Canada. Maybe I should have said, here in, ahh, let's see, country that is just north of the United States that uses currency that has is referred to as dollars but is in fact not United States dollars and guess what, is not even of equivalant value. Please, do help.

    94. Re:Good news! by juiceCake · · Score: 1

      "I wasn't the one who made the 'Dull' comments"

      Having reread my response I am sorry to say that it does indeed come out like I was accussing you of said comments. What I was trying to say is that in such situations such comments are all to frequent. Please accept my apologies. Or is it apology?

    95. Re:Good news! by Sparks23 · · Score: 1

      Fair 'nuff.

      And agreed that comments like that /are/ all too frequent in threads like this. :)

      --
      --Rachel
    96. Re:Good news! by raverbuzzy · · Score: 1

      I don't think it applys to the 12in models: link

    97. Re:Good news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's complete BS. I can still sell my 600Mhz on Ebay for $7-850. He'll even the old powerbook (500Mhz) still go for almost a thousand dollars!

    98. Re:Good news! by alankru · · Score: 1

      They're so quick anyway! Battery life? Yes, they're a jolly sight better than PC Notebooks. 5+ hours with iBook. 2 max on PC. I've had my PC notebook for about 3 months now, I don't store the battery in the PC notebook when I am connected to the mains and it is already charged. I regularly run it dead flat. Now, it only lasts for 15mins max. It's appualing. I've had my iBook for 2 months, use it all day and it gives the same battery life as it was new. I highly recommend an iBook or an Mac. (plus it looks sleak ;o) ). They are alot easier to use for beginners. I know someone who has used Linux and Windows, and not found them easy. They settled on a Mac and likes it lots better than the others. The OS and software are more thoughtout than Windows with lots of additional features built-in, without needing to get software to do even the simple tasks. Eg. Switching network configs between locations, cycling wallpapers. Simple tasks that involve getting additional freeware for Windows, but are already built into Mac OSX. (the games are better too ;o). If I've gone off-topic, or repeated something, I apologise. :)

    99. Re:Good news! by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      I would get nearly 5 hours out of a 867MHz 15" Powerbook, reading PDF's on the road.

      I was always jealous of my friend getting 5 hours out of his G3 Powerbook while I got 2.5 hours out of my Dell 4100.

    100. Re:Good news! by tbjw · · Score: 1

      But being honest here, trackpads are pretty annoying to use anyway, even if they have 15 buttons and whatnot. I'm using an iBook here, with a Dell optical USB mouse that I bought somewhere for 15. All in all, this is the nicest mouse I've ever used, and it's small and light. I very rarely use the trackpad, because it's so easy to carry the mouse around.

    101. Re:Good news! by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but how do you do this: "With the digital audio output, my Powerbook makes a better stereo/DVD player for me in my room as well."? I've looked around my 15"PB 1,25 gHz, and I can't see any SPDIF outs or abd coax outs... Is this in a former model?

    102. Re:Good news! by Sparks23 · · Score: 1

      The second-generation TiBook (the old Titanium Powerbooks, not the newer aluminum ones) has an optical audio out plug on the back panel, right between the SVideo out and the internal modem jack -- my bad for referring to it generically as a 'digital' audio out, but still definitely a far sight better than a mini headphone jack.

      --
      --Rachel
  2. new powerbook by freddej · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why can't I have paid of the loans for my old one so I can get a new?

    *damn*

  3. Damn! Damn! Damn! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    I bought a 12" PowerBook six months ago! I would have waited if Apple would have told us that a faster one would come out in the future! Damn you Steve Jobs!

    Guess now I will just have to wait for my carbon-fiber, dual G5 PowerBook with fold out twin displays and fuel cell technology battery with 12 hours of life that the rumor sites are talking about.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait all you want. What you need to do is get your wallet ahead of the hardware curve. Cause you know, once you buy a notebook, you're stuck with it. There's nothing to upgrade but the RAM. And maybe the hard drive.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    2. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Aside from the things you mention, and the graphics card, what else WOULD you upgrade in a Powerbook? It has everything - Firewire 400/800, USB, PCMCIA, gigabit ethernet, etc... a whole butt-load of ports.

      Sounds like you're just bitching to bitch.

    3. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by zgornz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asus makes laptops with upgradable CPUs. You can even buy them barebones (No CPU/RAM/Harddrive).

      http://usa.asus.com/products/notebook/nbindex.ht m

    4. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by misleb · · Score: 1

      Upgradable CPUs are overrated (especially in a laptop). By the time you get around to doing the upgrade, current CPUs are usually using a different socket/slot. Probably just end up shortening your battery life with the extra Mhz anyway. :-P

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    5. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by vicious2004 · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I just bought a powerbook 4 months ago (the apple loan with MBNA is a rip) and now they are getting a speed boost. its like putting the old powerbook and the newpower book on different sized sticks and you can only get the old one knowing the faster one is ahead. I would of loved the speed increase and graphics increase. DAMN you Steve Jobs

    6. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by pknoll · · Score: 4, Informative

      The resale value on Macs (Powerbooks especially) lets me upgrade the whole thing for less than I could do with an equivalent PC notebook.

    7. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny
      I bought a 12" PowerBook six months ago!
      SUCKER! Now you're wishing you had skipped the PowerBook purchase, and kept using your Osbourne 1 for just a few more months...
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, and they ahve been talking about the new PowerBook G5 for six months, and speed bumps for the PowerBook G4's for 8 months, and speed bumps for the G5 for 9 months... and more.

      They have no shortage of rumors there. But, I wouldn't count on them to be anything resembling accurate.

    9. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Asus makes laptops with upgradable CPUs. You can even buy them barebones (No CPU/RAM/Harddrive).

      Actually, Apple tried that too. Check here for an informative, if slightly outdated (newer upgrades are available since then) list of these upgrades. However, the economics of upgrading is usually doubtful. I was considering one back in the days of my old powerbook 1400 - finally I reckoned that for the price of new battery + USB card + new CPU + more RAM I can just sell my powerbook and buy a brand new iBook... and still have a much better machine. When you want a faster car, it's usually a better idea to sell the old vehicle and buy a new one, rather than go through the mess of tuning. It takes a hobbyist to prefer the second way - with laptops it's similar.

    10. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      Hey - I still (very occassionally) turn on my O1 just for the heck of it -- and Modem7 will still connect just fine with my linux box at 1200bps. Oh, and MONSTER still rocks - I'm scared of the @ -- aren't you?

    11. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by FattMattP · · Score: 1

      I'm holding out for the G6 implant!

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    12. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not practical from the manufacturers perspective, but motherboard, CPU and graphics card upgrades would be nice. Generally CPUs are hard wired to the board because it's cheaper and more compact. Also, what good would a CPU upgrade be without a faster motherboard? The biggest limitation I have with any machine is CPU speed and cache size. I don't want to spend $3000 for the fastest, biggest laptop, I just want a plain 12" with a buttload of cache and the fastest processor. I'd like to get a few more miles out of my 800 mhz iBook, thats all. Seems like a waste of resources to have to buy a whole new computer just to get an extra 700 mhz.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  4. Instead of a speed increase at the same price... by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead? I would love a 700mhz Powerbook for $600 or so (no thanks, refurbed units).

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  5. Converted by beeglebug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can someone refresh my memory? How fast is a 1.5ghz Apple processor when converted into Intel ghz?

    1. Re:Converted by troc · · Score: 5, Funny

      That depends which conversion algorithm you use :)

      The "Apple Zealot" converts 1.5GHz G4 into 3GHz P4

      The "PC Weenie" converts 1.5GHz G4 into 0.1 GHz P4 as that's about the speed it runs Virtual PC (probably, assuming anyone actually bought a Mac. Which nobody does. etc)

      The "Geek Index" says 1.5GHz G4 is about 2-2.5GHz P4 probably but it depends what you are doing and anyway it's all easily fast enough to code stuff and surf for pr0n.

      The "SETI Weirdo" calculates that a 1.5GHz G4 does more units than their rival^h^h^h^h^hfriend. So that's ok.

      The "Arty type people" think oooh a mac. It runs FCP.

      8 out of 10 CEOs go "a shiny thing"

      etc

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    2. Re:Converted by slim-t · · Score: 1
      Can someone refresh my memory? How fast is a 1.5ghz Apple processor when converted into Intel ghz?

      Does it matter? I've got a 2.4 GHz P4 at work, and a 550 MHz G4 Powerbook at home. I can't tell much of a diffence for what I do.

    3. Re:Converted by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny

      Troll?

      Hey Taco:

      I propose a new poll:

      "Which sub-group on Slashdot take themselves too seriously?"

      My vote has to be the coders. Post a joke in a Perl thread, and you will be modded -1 flamebait. These people are obsolutely incapable of laughing at themselves. Maybe they should get out more.

      Some of the Mac people here are almost as bad. This guy asked for a speed comparison between Intel and Apple procs. Sure, it may be a troll, but its not as obvious as the "Apple is (still) dying" thread.

      At least the BSD guys usually post the obligatory "BSD is dying" message before anybody else gets a chance too.

    4. Re:Converted by revscat · · Score: 1

      Ok, that was pretty funny. /wishin I had mod points.

    5. Re:Converted by beeglebug · · Score: 1

      Cheers buddy, it was a genuine question!
      It's just been waaaaay too long since I last looked into buying an Apple, and I wasn't sure how things stood. If anything I was inviting the Mac users to trumpet about how great they were.

      Anyway, it seems like some people have seen sense, i'm no longer a Troll.

    6. Re:Converted by Morgahastu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have the previous version of the 12" PowerBook running at 1ghz and it's noticably faster than my p4 1.5ghz. I'd rate it as feeling about the same as a 2.0ghz p4.

      So I'd say the 1.5 would be about a 2.8 or 3.0ghz pentium.

      While we're on this topic I'd like to point out that Macs feel much faster than they actually are because of the superb multi tasking and UI response under heavy load.

      When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

      On the other hand, my Mac can have 20 apps running and encoding a video at the same time and the UI still responds beautifully.

      This is why using a Mac is a great experience, you so rarely get frustrated at it because it just works.

    7. Re:Converted by panurge · · Score: 1
      Is an Apple G5 GHz the same as an AMD Opteron or Athlong 64 GHz, assuming similar cache sizes? And is a G4 GHz the same as a Mobile Pentium GHz?

      This seems closer to me to an apples to ...well, not apples obviously...comparison.

      I have this feeling that inside the P4 is really a small Maxwell's Demon, the whole GHz thing is irrelevant, it's how hard the electromagnet can be made to poke it to keep it working.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    8. Re:Converted by amichalo · · Score: 1

      I would just encourage you to also consider that the architecture of a Mac is different. Apple has a graphical representation of their Advanced PowerPC G5 System Controller (It's #4 in the graphic) which is totally different than the Intel world.

      in addition, there are immesurable differences in the productivity of OS X over XP or Linux and, so I may not be considered too much of a zealot, these differences may swing wildly in either direction based on the user's own familiarity with an alternative OS and their own personal learning curve.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    9. Re:Converted by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Can someone refresh my memory? How fast is a 1.5ghz Apple processor when converted into Intel ghz?

      How fast is an Intel processor running @ 1.5GHz compared to all other processors out there (including the various Intel offerings)? A 1.5GHz Itanium2 is really fast, I would speculate that a 1.5GHz PIII would be faster than a 1.5GHz PIV (if the PIII existed at that speed). A 1.5GHz PentiumM chip would be between a 1.5GHz Itanium2 chip and a 1.5GHz PIV. I did not even bring the Xscale or Celeron or MP models of Intel processors.

      I'm typing this on a 1.25GHz powerbook, and I have no processor issues. Memory, now thats a different story, OSX is a memory hog, and 512megs is not enough for me.

      I would not do any serious CPU intensive work on a 1.5GHz G4 processor though. By this I mean video editing, possibly high DPI image processing might be a little slow as well. Especially on a powerbook, it might melt.

      To answer your question, its fast enough for basic usage. No issues for everyday use. I would go for more horsepower with a G5 if I were to do any serious processing of data.

    10. Re:Converted by quantum+bit · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

      That's a result of Windows's semi brain-dead priority system. Pop open task manager, find the encoding process (the one that's gobbling all your CPU), right click on it and set priority to 'Low' or 'Idle'.

      I used to play Unreal Tournament while encoding videos all the time without a problem. It encodes slower at low priority but UT didn't suffer much of a performance hit. Made me miss my old dual-CPU system though.

      Unless of course you're running that 9X/ME crap, which even most Windows users these days realize sucks.

    11. Re:Converted by Mateito · · Score: 2, Informative
      You numbat! From Wikipedia::

      On the Internet, troll is a slang term for a person who posts messages intended to create controversy or provoke an angry response rather than to add content to a discussion.

      Your anime example question is "OffTopic".

      "All Mac users are gay" is "Flamebait"

      "Why would you want to use a mac anyway when Linux is so much better?" is a "Troll".

      However asking about comparable processor speeds in a thread talking about how Mac has just released faster processors, is dead on topic.

    12. Re:Converted by be-fan · · Score: 1

      A G4 is about as fast as a PIII at the same clock-speed. It should be a bit slower than the Pentium M at the same clock-speed, because the G4 is limited by a really slow SDR memory bus. a 1.6GHz P-M is comparable to a 2.2 - 2.4GHz P4. So the G4 1.5GHz should be comparable to about a 2.0 - 2.0 GHz P4. That's probably being a bit generous, but you get the idea.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Converted by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The G5 vs Opteron comparison is about right, with the G5 winning out on heavily vector-oriented code. The G4 vs P-M comparison is a bit generous --- the P-M has a much faster memory bus, so you want to dock some points from the G4.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    14. Re:Converted by LEgregius · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From what I can tell, for integer-only code (i.e. no altivec) a G4 is a little slower than a Pentium 3 (not 4) or Pentium-M (which is a modded P3) running at the same clock speed. In fact, my 1.25GHz G4 runs C/C++ code in OSX at about 2/3 the speed of the same code on my 1.7GHz Pentium-M running linux (both using gcc 3.3 and pretty standard optimizations). Since a 1.7GHz Pentium-M is about the same speed as a 2.2 or 2.4 GHz Pentium 4, that makes the G4 reasonable faster than a P4 at the same clock speed. Both of my machines have 1GB of RAM, btw.

      Altivec code, on the other hand, seems to be very different. Code that heavily uses the altivec, like MP3/AAC encoding, graphics work, Folding@Home, and the OS X UI seems to be much faster at the same clock speed. For doing Folding@home, for example, my 1.25GHz G4 is quite a bit faster than my 1.7GHz Pentium-M. A few years ago, I had a 667 G4 and a 1.2GHz athlon. The G4 was nearly twice as fast as the athlon when doing Distributed.NET type stuff (rc5-64 at the time, I think).

      For those of you doing Java, a G4 seems to run Java code of any sort, including the compiler, the same speed as an Athlon XP or Pentium-M at a 50% greater clock speed, or 80% higher for a P4. I did tests compiling the same code in the same IDE, doing code refactoring, etc. The disks drives, btw, were approximately the same speed and the ram was the same for all these tests.

      I know I haven't done really official tests, I'm just stating my experience.

    15. Re:Converted by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      MHz for MHz, it's about the same as the Athlon XP "Barton".

      So, a 1.6GHz G4 = 2.0GHz P4.

      It can be faster (Altivec optimized programs) or slower (slow bus speed), but you get the idea.

    16. Re:Converted by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      .................what?

      Processor, chipset, memory, peripherals. That's exactly the same as a PC.

      Actually, A PC would have all those nice peripherals on the chipset, not the PCI-X bus.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    17. Re:Converted by tesmako · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is not an CISC vs. RISC issue, it is an IPC-count issue. The G4 typically has better IPC-counts than a P4 thanks to a pipeline flush being a lot cheaper. They are still slower overall of course on account of the P4's pipeline allowing the rather incredible clock frequencies it does. The current G4 is not really cache-starved, at 512 kilobytes of L2 it is behind the P4 but it is not really bad. It features more L1 cache than a P4 and has lower access latencies for both L1 and L2.

      All in all the G4 is faster clock-by-clock than the P4 in most cases. It doesnt make it faster than the P4 either way though since it still clocks far too low, but it is a competent CPU.

    18. Re:Converted by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Informative
      I would have to echo these comments. The task priority system is so bad on XP that you can have one 32bit app starve the system of CPU locking up the system. The memory allocation system is also lacking.

      I am speaking as a developer on the Win32/.NET platform and home mac laptop/eMac user.

      My 12" pbook feels faster than my work P4 2.2 Ghz desktop.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    19. Re:Converted by calstraycat · · Score: 1

      It's true that OS X has far superior multi-tasking relative to Windows. When I do a processor intensive task on my Windows boxes, I have to walk away and let it finish. I'm not sure why more people don't bring this issue up. Being able to perform other tasks and have the system and other apps remain responsive while encoding video in the background is huge productivity enhancer.

    20. Re:Converted by tgibbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's true that OS X has far superior multi-tasking relative to Windows. When I do a processor intensive task on my Windows boxes, I have to walk away and let it finish. I'm not sure why more people don't bring this issue up. Being able to perform other tasks and have the system and other apps remain responsive while encoding video in the background is huge productivity enhancer.

      I recently configured a low-end Dell for my sister. I figured the 2.4 GHz Celeron would easily smoke my old 800 MHz G4 TiBook. And I have no doubt that on a single-application benchmark, it would. But in practice, I was cursing at the thing because it seemed so damned slow. My laptop just feels faster. And that perception seems to be because virtually nothing bogs it down, so I've gotten in the habit of multitasking. Start an application installation or system update, and then check my email while it is in process. Start three applications at the same time and browse the web while they load. Start a graphics program rendering a big tiff, then switch to Word and work on a document. I was expecting to do the same thing on the Dell, but often one application will bog down the entire system. But for the way I've gotten in the habit of working, it feels pokey.

    21. Re:Converted by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when do you run a computer without an OS? :) Benchmarks are nice for comparing new revisions of the same processor family but are entirely useless for determining if a computer (OS and hardware) will perform well with everyday tasks.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    22. Re:Converted by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Eh, I wouldn't consider it a troll either, maybe flamebait, but not so much flames driected at you, so much as trying to entice a pointless arguemnt among other users. I guess maybe you could call that a troll, but as far as ofenses go this is hardly the worst.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    23. Re:Converted by Wiz · · Score: 1

      If you think that a 1.5GHz G4 is equiv to a 3GHz Pentium 4 then you are sadly mistaken. Apple didn't publish SPEC figures for the G4, but you can google for them and you'll fine a 1GHz G4 is slower than a 1 GHz P3! A 3GHz P4 will toast it.

      The G5 is a very good processor, and I would fancy a 2GHz G5 to beat a 3GHz P4 in some tasks depending on what they are. It will not beat it across the board though. The G5 is good, is it not THAT good! Expect it to match the Opteron clock for clock though (approx).

    24. Re:Converted by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      No way the P4 is faster clock for clock than the P3. The Pentium M, which takes the basic core of the P3, adds in some new instructions from the P4, and gets some new features of its own *destroys* the P4 in IPC.

      Intel has made major improvements in their branch prediction, but the fact remains with a huge pipeline that keeps getting bigger (ie: Prescot), every single branch mispredict you hit is going to hurt you dearly compared to processors with shorter pipelines. (At this point, the P3's pipeline is almost half the length of Prescot).

      Intel's done work to make improvements in the P4's IPC, sure, but they've focused their efforts more on ramping up clockspeed than anything. Even Intel seems to recognize this is a poor long-term strategy, with the move to Pentium-M as their flagship CPU coming in the near future.

    25. Re:Converted by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      It's true that OS X has far superior multi-tasking relative to Windows. When I do a processor intensive task on my Windows boxes, I have to walk away and let it finish. I'm not sure why more people don't bring this issue up.

      Because the only people who find it to be true are Mac zealots...

    26. Re:Converted by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      I have the previous version of the 12" PowerBook running at 1ghz and it's noticably faster than my p4 1.5ghz. I'd rate it as feeling about the same as a 2.0ghz p4.

      A 1.5Ghz P4 is pretty old - the architecture has changed a bit since then.

      So I'd say the 1.5 would be about a 2.8 or 3.0ghz pentium.

      These are laptops, compare to laptop CPUs. A 1.5Ghz G4 will be about on par with a 1.7Ghz Pentium M.

      While we're on this topic I'd like to point out that Macs feel much faster than they actually are because of the superb multi tasking and UI response under heavy load.

      O_o

      OS X has barely adequate UI responsiveness with _no_ load (and it doesn't get any better). Even a brand spanking new G5 can't resize windows smoothly. The primary reason I ditched my PB a year or so ago was because of the awful UI responsiveness (and having recently borrowed a similar machine running 10.4, the situation has improved - but it still feels "chunky").

      When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

      Something is wrong with your PC. I can happily rip DVDs in the background while doing just about anything - browsing the web, writing documents - even playing games.

    27. Re:Converted by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      And here we have why I'm in the process of switching to Macs. (Just waiting for some things to ship)

      I'm tired of every single solution to a problem on XP being a kludge.

    28. Re:Converted by calstraycat · · Score: 1

      Read the post. No one claimed that any processor was faster than another due to superior multitasking in OS X. He just said it allowed him to be more productive because he can continue to work while the processor performs heavy lifting in the background. If someone can perform multiple tasks simultaneously, then they are more productive. If you have wait for your PC to finish before moving on, you lose time and money.

      BTW, pointing out an aspect were one system is superior to another does not make one a zealot.

    29. Re:Converted by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      My vote has to be the coders. Post a joke in a Perl thread, and you will be modded -1 flamebait. These people are obsolutely incapable of laughing at themselves. Maybe they should get out more.

      I don't think it's even possible to code in Perl without having a sense of humor. Maybe you're thinking of C programmers?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. Remember..... by crumbz · · Score: 1

    When you compare the price of a Powerbook to a Dell, that this is a UNIX laptop.

    Unless you run Linux, of course.

    1. Re:Remember..... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why would I need to remember that?

      why would the consumer need to remember that ooh macosx is unix based omg kewlor gimme gimme, especially when very few understand anything what 'unix' means if anything in this case?

      when you're comparing them you should compare what can it do for you at what price.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Remember..... by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      Personally, the fact that it was based off of BSD was a selling point for me. And why not? The solid design *nix systems are famous for combined with the usability and ease of use Apple computers are famous for. Sounds good to me.

      --
      Little Bricklets
  7. powerbook improvement by millahtime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a year old powerbook and the new ones for the same deal I got have halk gigahertz speed improvement, 20 gig bigger hard drive, over twice the speed of dvd burn, faster wireless, faster firewire bluetooth and more. And it's the same price. That's quite an increase for a year. It's so cool to see yet so depressing at the same time.

    1. Re:powerbook improvement by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Don't forget the backlit keyboard, which auto-detects when the lights dim enough to require it.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:powerbook improvement by trip23 · · Score: 1

      Since years I looked at computer hardware purchases in this way: It's a tool that gets used and i pay for being able to get work done, not for letting my pretty powerbook sit idle and watch its value crumble. So it costs me e.g. 100$ a month, which are wisely spent if the computer improves my life/workday. This gives you less headache if a new one with better specs is introduced (unless you need every bit of performance). Just another expense, like rent, transport, good tasting apples, food, medical, etc.

    3. Re:powerbook improvement by Kjella · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't worry, you'll get used to it. I've "regretted" every computer purchase I ever made a year later "Why couldn't I have waited just a year longer?". Give it another year and it'll have another half a GHz, 20gig bigger HDD, dual layer DVD burning, wireless broadband and whatnot. And those that bought it now will find it "cool, yet so depressing".

      I wonder when computers will really flatline. My dad was hired because the local IBM was just starting computers, you know with radio tubes and all. They were always asking "When is it going to stop?" Like, decades ago. So far, it hasn't.

      And I honestly don't see much indication that it will. Dual layer DVD? Blue-Ray? Internet connections as fast as local networks today? LCDs taking over for CRTs (still on CRT here)? OLED taking over for LCD? Wireless broadband? ATI and NVidia shoving fps through the roof?

      There's so much that hasn't been done yet. I wish a computer from the future would fall out of a time warp or something. Just in my time, I've gone from 64kb -> 1gb of RAM. That's 16,384 times greater. It won't stop there...

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:powerbook improvement by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Not depressing at all for me. It gives me an excellent reason for my fiance to let me buy a new laptop to replace my 400mhz G4 tower.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:powerbook improvement by Arkham · · Score: 1

      It won't stop until the hardware speed outstrips software needs, when CPUs are so fast that we don't ever wait for the computer to do anything, when storage is so plentiful that we don't need to track capacity anymore, when video cards can render photorealistic images in stereo in real time, and when networks are so quick that local and network storage are indistinquisable.

      So, basically, never.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    6. Re:powerbook improvement by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the backlit keyboard, which auto-detects when the lights dim enough to require it.

      Guh, don't even get me started, it's not on the model *I* want :~( I think that would be awesome, and I really want it.. However, I want the 12", the low end (i'm used to a lombard, so any system is a step up, and I dig the 12" for the portability and weight) and dammit, I WANT A F'ING BACKLIT KEYBOARD. But then again, I chalk it up as a "wow, that's cool, but not totally necessary." sort of thing, so I'm sure i'll get by :)

      -matt

    7. Re:powerbook improvement by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Argh, I know i've got no class for replying to myself, but I had a thought, and figured this is the place to ask it if anyplace. I'm sure it won't be long before someone's putting a 15 or 17"ers keyboard on their 12" powerbook.. Is there really anything behind it? They're the same size, I'm thinking you could probably swap k/bs out, but I guess you wouldn't have the light sensor to accompany it.. Does this seem somewhat plausable? My guess is that there's probably more to it than just replacing a keyboard, otherwise they'd offer it. In any case, I know there's someone on slashdot who owns a 15 or 17 that knows how the backlight k/b works who would probably be able to tell us whether or not they think it would work.

      -matt

    8. Re:powerbook improvement by gotih · · Score: 1

      but there's only so much information that YOU can process. so it depens on what you use your computer for. i write php and sql, browse the web and check email. i don't do video work, play games or compile much. for me, the flatline was around 4 years ago. i've been using (and abusing) my pentium 3, 450mhz laptop with 192 mb of ram for four years. recently i had to write some java so i SSH'ed into my shared, co-located server. the compile times were more than cut in half. it's not something i do often so i didn't mind having to work thru SSH. that said, i'll probably be buying a used G4 laptop sometime in the next few months... my laptop's case is cracked in 13 places and the screen has had a slight flicker for over a year.

      --

      fear is the mind killer
    9. Re:powerbook improvement by BK425 · · Score: 1

      I've never regretted a computer buy. When I was a kid I pestered my mom into helping me buy a C64, it was my first computer. I had thought much earlier about trying to get a cheap sinclair or something but I waited a few years to save up for something better. As -soon- as I got it I thought back on 2-3 years of "waiting" and realized what I could have learned in that time.
      Sure, technology is getting better all of the time. That's not a reason to take yourself out of participation in the here and now, or to regret the powermac6100 gathering dust in the basement (anybody want an obso SE30 for cheap?)

  8. Parity with the Pentium-M by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Informative

    it is looking like Apple is going to keep the G4 around for low powered mobiles, just like the Pentium-M .

    all that is needed is a 15 inch and 17 inch G5 model, I was hoping that it would be this summer, perhaps in the fall.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:Parity with the Pentium-M by crackshoe · · Score: 1

      The g5 is the newer (much hotter) proc. Apple has finally phased out the g3 entirely (the iBooks were the last g3 based computer that apple sold), and now the g4 is the 'low end' processor. Apple's done a good job never having more than 2 proc architectures out on the market at the same time - i'm sure eventually apples crafty engineers will sell enough souls to gain the divine wisdom needed to make a g5 laptop that doesn't singe your pubes. and then we'll have the g6, which will be a tiny goad.

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    2. Re:Parity with the Pentium-M by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      the heat dissipation of the G5 at 2.0 GHz and less is low enough to fit in the powerbooks.

      you will not see 3.0 GHz powerbooks because Apple will not create 10 pound 3 inch think laptops like all the p4 laptops you see around.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Parity with the Pentium-M by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      all that is needed is a 15 inch and 17 inch G5 model, I was hoping that it would be this summer, perhaps in the fall

      I wouldn't hold your breath. Apparently, IBM is having yield issues producing G5s at their NY plants. On top of that, G5s are already in high demand, which only suggests a longer waiting time for all us laptop users.

      --
      Little Bricklets
  9. G5 Laptops by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any news available about if or when there are going to be G5 based laptops released?

    I'm looking to get an Apple notebook in about 6 months but I don't want to have a big jump like the G4 to G5 be released a few months later when I could've gone without it for a little longer and then got the G5.

    1. Re:G5 Laptops by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      The most likely consensus seems to be an announcement around the January 2005 MacWorld. I'm sure it's at least six months away. If it's announced in MacWorld, it seems to take at least two months for the new machines to show up.

      So if you need a machine now, this is a good time to buy.

      D

    2. Re:G5 Laptops by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Funny

      It will be announced the day after they charge your Visa - no sooner, no later!

    3. Re:G5 Laptops by mihalis · · Score: 1

      I'm sceptical, XServe G5 was a little late, and it's THAT cpu (90nm 970fx) that you'd want in a laptop. G5 desktop machines have the original PowerPC 970 which in my opinion is just a little hot for any laptop.

      I'm guessing we'll see desktop G5 workstations move up to 970fx some time this summer, so I don't foresee g5 laptops until a year after that.

      Or am I just indulging in wishful thinking that my 867Mhz 12" g4 powerbook wont be hopelessly dated for a while longer? Could be...

    4. Re:G5 Laptops by NaugaHunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's likely they already have feasible prototypes. However, IBM is currently having problems turning out enough G5's just for the towers and XServes. They are not likely to push ahead until they are certain supplies will be maintainable.

      And really, the need to handle power/heat issues in a laptop may be causing other problems with getting one in a laptop anyway. If they went through the trouble of introducing a speed bump G5 laptops won't be in the next 6 months. In addition, when they do arrive they will probably be only in the high end at first, so if your thinking low-end money range it will probably be longer still.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    5. Re:G5 Laptops by cygnus · · Score: 1
      I'm looking to get an Apple notebook in about 6 months but I don't want to have a big jump like the G4 to G5 be released a few months later when I could've gone without it for a little longer and then got the G5.
      really, realistically, you'll want to wait for the second release of whatever G5 portable comes out. the first release of apple's stuff has a history of having sort of congenital defects.
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    6. Re:G5 Laptops by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative
      The PowerPC 970FX chip, used in the G5 XServes, is low power enough to go in a laptop (24.5W at 2.0GHz, my guess would be they'd start off with the 1.6GHz versions). The next problem is keeping the other components low power enough (faster memory controller, etc). I would assume that they started prototyping those parts with the PPC970 (used in the towers), and are now using the 970FX in testing.

      Unfortunately, the yields on the 970FX are nowhere near high enough yet for them to have enough to satisfy demand for G5 Powerbooks.

      I currently use a 15" Albook (1.25GHz G4) as my primary machine. The only time it's ever slow is when I'm doing something complicated in Final Cut Express, or running VirtualPC (which runs at about PII 266MHz speed).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:G5 Laptops by mattkime · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the cooling system in the desktop G5s?

      You wanna lug that around?

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    8. Re:G5 Laptops by 33degrees · · Score: 1

      Apple has a relatively constant rate of product updates, with the average for powerbooks being 171 days. This would mean that, chances are in 6 months there will be a new model, which should be G5 based barring any significant hurdles. However, it's generally safer to avoid first generation products, as they typically have bugs that get worked out in the first revision.

      All of this to say that, now is really the best time to buy a powerbook, as chances are it will be at least a year before we get bugfree G5 powerbooks... but if you absolutely must wait 6 months, there should be something new by that time.

    9. Re:G5 Laptops by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sitting here on my spiffy 1.25GHz G4, and I launched Fallout2 and holy crap suddenly my crotch was on fire!

      Wait.

      That went wrong somewhere.

      Point being, the G4s are damn hot.

      (full disclosure: I'm not a Mac zealot, but I do love my powerbook)

    10. Re:G5 Laptops by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Not for a while. Of course, I don't speak from authority but here's how I figure. Thre's another update due sometime around Nov I'd say. This update should bring the iBooks up to speed with current powerbooks. I would say that would be the absolute earliest that you will see a G5 notebook, but I would bet we wont see anything new until the next update after that, which would be roughly this time next year.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    11. Re:G5 Laptops by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      I love my Powerbook too, but not so much I let it anywhere near my lap.

      Yes, they are hot. But along with a G5 come different buses and caches and memory (oh my), possibly all running faster. So even if the G5 is inherently cooler than the G4 the whole shebang is probably hotter.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    12. Re:G5 Laptops by Marvin_OScribbley · · Score: 1

      It will be announced the day after they charge your Visa - no sooner, no later!

      So please, think of the rest of us, and hurry up and order your G4 laptop today!

      --
      I'm not a journalist, but I play one on slashdot
  10. Speedbumped? by Ratface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this a standard term to describe the process of increasing processor speed in a line of computers? If so it's very poorly thought out. A speedbump is normally something that is used to slow down motorists on a tretch of road. So I instinctively interpreted that as meaning that Apple had released a line with capped processor speeds!

    I suspect that this is just the poster's own term to describe this. Oh well!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Speedbumped? by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are mixing "Speed Bump" up with "Speedbump".

      The term "Speed Bump" has been in use in Apple circlessine at least the time the original 8100 PowerPC went from 80 to 100 to 110 Mhz.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    2. Re:Speedbumped? by spanklin · · Score: 1
      Is this a standard term to describe the process of increasing processor speed in a line of computers?

      I don't know how standard it is across the industry, but it is at least a standard term in the Mac press. I didn't even blink when I read the headline because I've seen that expression used with Macs so often.

    3. Re:Speedbumped? by greygent · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      It means that they've BUMPed up the speed again. Perhaps getting a life or some other hobbies might help you out here.

      I'd hate to hear what you think when you hear "driveway" or "parkway". I can imagine tons of little children being crushed under the tires of your car, because you're so stupid you take everything literally.

    4. Re:Speedbumped? by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what, you're right. Therefore, I think we should officially advocate uses of the phrases "erected", "up-jacked", or "humped up" in order to more accurately convey a speed boost.

    5. Re:Speedbumped? by easter1916 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Bumping" is the act of taking little fingernail amounts of coke and snorting them on the fly, and that certainly speeds things up. Given that the Mac community is a creative and marketing set, this might explain the use of "bump" in this context. :-)

    6. re: Speedbumped? by skinny.net · · Score: 1

      Intel salutes Itanium with speed bump | The Register

      Speed bump for Apple notebooks (BBC).

      It seems the term is pretty common and not specific to Macs.

  11. Benchmarks by SkiddyRowe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone have any benchmark comparisons (3rd party comparisons, none of this "Apple-funded / Intel-funded" stuff) I'm a bit skeptical considering I bought a Dell laptop with 1.6Ghtz about 1.5 years ago.

    This isn't considered to be a troll, I'm just wondering about the performance difference.

    1. Re:Benchmarks by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1, Troll

      MHz for MHz, G4 is faster than P4.

      How much faster, I will not say, but a 1.4GHz G4 is very different from a 1.4GHz P4. Or P3.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:Benchmarks by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 4, Insightful


      How much faster, I will not say, but a 1.4GHz G4 is very different from a 1.4GHz P4. Or P3.

      And impossible to do, really, because the amount of difference depends heavily on the application being used. Some applications can take, and are designed to take, better advantage of the PPC + Altivec. Other applications don't benefit nearly as much.

      So it all depends on what you want to do with it, really--and I recommend that you determine what you'll be doing with such a laptop most of the time, and then clock those processes. If speed is your chief concern.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:Benchmarks by millahtime · · Score: 1

      " Does anyone have any benchmark comparisons (3rd party comparisons, none of this "Apple-funded / Intel-funded" stuff) I'm a bit skeptical considering I bought a Dell laptop with 1.6Ghtz about 1.5 years ago."

      THe new apples are significantly faster than that in all around general use. I have a laptop for work that is that fast and a ppc laptop for my personal use and the ppc blows it away. they are both about a year old.

      THe archiecture is radicaly different and remember so is the OS. OS X based on BSD is much much faster than windows. it's like running a linux vs windows comparison on a pc. linux wins. same here with the apple os x. it's just faster. on top of the fast hardware.

    4. Re:Benchmarks by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      So...

      You wanna sell it to me cheap, if you hate it so much?

      (Note: if you don't have at least 512MB of memory in there, it makes a big difference on OS X. Apple really shouldn't sell anything with less than 512; hell, I have 512 on my G3 powerbook. It makes a noticeable difference.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    5. Re:Benchmarks by cheide · · Score: 1

      I was curious and did my own testing a little while ago, comparing a 1GHz iBook G4 against my Athlon 1700XP+ system. The Athlon won all tests in raw speed, but I also normalized against the clock rate to get a work-per-clock-cycle rating.

      In general, the G4 was a far bit slower at music encoding to both MP3 and Ogg Vorbis (worse floating point and lack of hand-crafted PPC optimizations?), had a large lead in gzip compression (better cache?), and was roughly equal at encryption.

      And of course this was hardly scientific, measured raw CPU speed only, is heavily dependent on compiler optimization (tests were done with GCC 3.2.3 on Linux 2.6.3), cache access patterns, etc., etc., etc...

    6. Re:Benchmarks by pknoll · · Score: 1
      Speed isn't everything, anyway. Take a top fuel dragster, for instance - almost nothing is as fast in a straight line, but a VW Golf (or a dozen other cars) would beat the pants off of one on a skidpad.

      A PC laptop might be faster than my Powerbook, but the Powerbook handles better (read, better response under load).

    7. Re:Benchmarks by insert+3+letters · · Score: 1

      The osx is BSD so its faster arguement is weak, because, well I run linux (and have run bsd) on my x86 laptop. Also note that if this is a pentium-M, these chips do not follow the standard Intel Ghz ratings, a 1.7 Ghz p4-m is similar in speed to something like a 2.6 Ghz P4c (I could be wrong on thsi exact number, but it really is a big difference) I'd bet the new g4 laptops are faster than a p-M laptop bought 1/5 years ago though/

    8. Re:Benchmarks by CatOne · · Score: 1

      I'd wager the Dell is faster in some tasks, and the Mac is faster in others.

      However, often on a laptop, your HD speed makes a WAY bigger difference in how fast the machine "feels."

      I'll avoid the standard G4 versus Pentium "clock speed" arguments -- because it's impossible to pin down. The G4's are NOT the fastest chips in the universe (and anyone trying to use "new math" to do so is in Steve's RDF), but a 1.5 GHz G4 laptop is pretty darned responsive. Plus, the chances that you're burying the laptop at 100% all the time are slim to none. I have a 1 GHz TiBook and it's very good for day to day use, but I don't do heavy development work on it. A dual G5 is 3-10 times faster for most tasks, but I don't need that all that often, only when opening up resource-pig stuff like Keynote (no joke :-P)

  12. Any system software updates also? by Debian+Troll's+Best · · Score: 1, Troll
    About 6 months ago I switched from a Dell running Linux to a 12" PowerBook. The attraction of Mac OS X's polished GUI, with all the raw power of UNIX available at the command prompt was too much of a temptation in the end. Of course I missed a lot of the software I used on my older Dell/Linux notebook, but these needs were well taken care of with the 'fink' software, which allows you to install many popular open source applications alongside Mac OS X.

    So, my question is, alongside these great hardware updates just announced (12" PowerBook got bumped 33% to 1.33GHz!!!), has Apple updated any of the included software? I'm especially interested in things related to the Darwin UNIX core, or the Fink system. It'd be really great if Apple included a newer version of Fink, because the version of apt-get which was included with my 2003 12" PowerBook is a little out of date now. If apt-get has been updated, then I'll be getting my current PowerBook onto eBay, and I'll be ordering a new 1.33GHz 12" PowerBook tomorrow!

    I look forward to the community's response!

    1. Re:Any system software updates also? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 4, Informative

      So on the offchance that you're not trolling:
      • Fink isn't developed by Apple, and they have nothing to do with it, aside from some possible back channel help. However, it did not come "included" on your PowerBook, unless you bought it used.
      • You can check for a more recent version of fink by: % sudo fink selfupdate
      • You don't need to sell your hardware to update your software.
      Hope this helps. Welcome to the Mac.
      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:Any system software updates also? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      Very cool/refreshing to see an honest-to-god helpfull answer to a potential troll without any namecalling/flaming/etc. Thanks, you made my day!

  13. Worst. Title. Ever. by Mr.Surly · · Score: 1, Funny

    Usually a "speed bump" is something that slows you down.

    1. Re:Worst. Title. Ever. by avalys · · Score: 4, Funny

      And usually a troll is a mythical being that lives under bridges and eats people who pass by.

      Terms and expressions can mean different things in different contexts.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Worst. Title. Ever. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      "And usually a troll is a mythical being that lives under bridges and eats people who pass by."

      Yeah, but do they roast them, mince&boil them or smash them?

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  14. Hold Over? by creative_name · · Score: 4, Informative

    The real question (rumor?) floating around other mac-specific news sites is whether or not this is just to hold us over until the release of G5 notebooks sometime in the not to distant future (January?) A couple interesting threads:

    Apple Insider

    MacNN

    --
    Posting as directed.
    1. Re:Hold Over? by zpok · · Score: 1

      Eternal computer buying dilemmas.

      For everybody looking for the right time to buy the latest and greatest: might I suggest the following? It works every time:

      Evidently, the fastest computer will be the latest model.
      If you need a computer in say January, buy one in January.
      If you need one today, buy one today.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    2. Re:Hold Over? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to buy a Mac. They retain resale value better, and therefore make the next big computer purchase cheaper.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:Hold Over? by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      whether or not this is just to hold us over until the release of G5 notebooks sometime in the not to distant future (January?)

      Dude, that is a whole 9 months away. 9 months is a long time (especially considering how fast computers advance)! As the previous poster stated, you should get a new computer whenever you need it. If you can wait until January, then more power to you. In fact, if you can wait 4 years, then why not? Again, all based on your needs.

      --
      Little Bricklets
  15. Re:5200's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is there something I'm missing, maybe?

    That this is a video card for a low-end consumer laptop, not a 1337 game system, maybe?

  16. Re:5200's? by jone1941 · · Score: 5, Informative

    seriously, if you are buying an apple laptop with the prospect of playing doom3 or half-life2 you are an idiot. I am not entirely sure if half-life2 is even slated for a mac release. In any case, for a laptop that you are using to do day to day stuff with, then a 5200 is a pretty decent card. If you honestly think you might use it for gaming get a laptop with a 9700. In both cases you are looking a mobile version of these cards which means you are getting a somewhat underpowered card to begin with.

    --
    Fear trumps hope and ignorance trumps both
  17. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Tyrdium · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because dropping the price would kill their nice margins, and they wouldn't make as much money. Let's say it costs (pulling numbers out of thin air) $500 to build a $1500 laptop, and $200 to build a $800 laptop. Assuming they sell the same number of each, which are they going to want to sell? Of course, they'd probably sell more of the $800 laptop, but they'd have to sell a lot more to make it worthwhile...

  18. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by spanklin · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead?

    You can usually find good deals on older hardware right around the time that they are about to announce a new model. They just don't offer it to everyone through the Apple Store. Instead, I usually see them advertised in the Mac User's Group store and places that other long time customers have a chance at them.

  19. standard practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "speed bumping" is the act of bumping the speed up on a product line.

    This has been in use for years.

  20. Pricing by Mtn_Dewd · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I have been looking at getting a 15" powerbook in the last few days and it's probably good I didn't do that. I noticed a few retailers started selling their models with price cuts a couple days ago -- now I know why. Anyhow, the base price of the new line is cheaper than the old line, which I find to be interesting.

    --



    My little sad piece of the internet: www.mtndewd
  21. Re:5200's? by crackshoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ummm... i assume thats why they're offering the higher end video card - to those few dedicated mac gamers, or those who do graphics work. but they offer a lower end card so a general user doesn't have to pay for something they really don't need. this is, as far as i recall, the first time that apple has offred a video card option in its laptops.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by scrotch · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... poor collage kids with a large portion of their annual income devoted to beer and video games...

    Maybe if you get a Mac you won't have to drink so much...

  24. Re:5200's? by Zooka · · Score: 1

    "Is there something I'm missing, maybe?"

    That laptops normally aren't used as gaming rigs?

  25. Differences between the models? by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of getting a 17" PowerBook to replace my 15" model, and this is usually the best time to buy, with lower prices on the outgoing models and of course the excitement of the incoming ones.

    How much difference is there between the old and new 17" models? Would I notice .25ghz in actual use? And would I notice the graphics chip differences at all as a non-gamer who mainly uses the system for pro applications such as Final Cut and After Effects?

    D

    1. Re:Differences between the models? by analog-1 · · Score: 1

      FinalCut uses your graphics card for more than you might think.. The RTExtreme effects in FCP use (at least partially) OpenGL acceleration. So, an upgraded video card like the Mobility 9700 could provide a nice speed boost in effects previews.

    2. Re:Differences between the models? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Would I notice .25ghz in actual use?

      Run activity monitor. How often do you use 100% of your CPU? Every time you do is a time you would notice a faster CPU. The difference is 20%, so assuming that only the foreground process is using any CPU, it would feel 20% faster. My 15" Albook usually uses about 20% of the CPU for background things (iTunes, jabber client, etc), so the foreground task only has 80% of the CPU. If you're in the same situation, then an extra 20% of CPU speed would give you 25% more usable CPU.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  26. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    I think that, because apple has far less inventory than, say, dell, they manage to clear out the old stock pretty well with EOL. On the other hand, if i remember, i think you can get old-new hardware if you're part of a MUG (but i'm really not positive).

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  27. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Well.. cheaper models will be sold more.

    And.. think about the mass economy.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead? I would love a 700mhz Powerbook for $600 or so (no thanks, refurbed units).

    The answer is simple really. Apple would like to maintain their products as objects of desire. Sexy bits of computer art that both inspire lust and allow us to accomplish our work easier and/or faster than ever before, making a difference. To lower the prices would reduce Apple computers to commodity items much like the rest of the Wintel world.

    How many Dell, HP, Compaq, graybox etc.... hardware rollouts are greeted with the same kind of fervor that Apple computer hardware announcements inspire?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  30. Re:5200's? by MattyCobb · · Score: 1

    I shudder to think what it would do if I tried to play Doom 3 or Half-Life 2 on it in a few months' time.

    Oh thats RICH! Half-Life will come right after Team Fortress Classic 2, the working Final Release of Steam (where Friends list works at least 80% of the time), the Steam SDK (we know thats just not here cuz they dont want us to see their awful code), and Valve's super-fast PowerPlay (remember that .com lie)! Valve is teh champion of vaporware. They had Half-Life, and thats it. The only thing they have done since is those awful expansion packs and buyup and ruin mods. Oh and try to run Gamespy Arcade and WON into the ground with their filthy Steam that is running for Worst Code Ever Written.

    Heh, but ANYWAY, back on-topic (sorry, I have to vent on Valve everynow and then), I think you miss the point. A 5200 would be plenty powerful for an Apple Laptop. I image it performs quite nicely. Most mac laptop users are not going to be playing a lot of games on theirs anyway, and if they are, probably wont be Half-Life 2 or Doom 3. That and any vid card you get on a laptop will be slower than its desktop counterpart.

    --

    Matt
    You have 1 Moderator Point! Use it or lose it! Is that a threat? -vapid
  31. Speed Bump? Merriam Webster says. by ayeco · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Main Entry: speed bump
    Function: noun
    : a low raised ridge across a roadway (as in a parking lot) to limit vehicle speed

    We had to slow the car down, as there was a speed bump in the street.

  32. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    They drop prices all the time. You just never noticed. You know the eMac dropped in price, right? And a couple bumps ago, the PowerBooks too.

    After a year's time, what is the difference between a price drop or a feature increase?

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. Re:5200's? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    Actually, when i looked at the actual facts, the lower end card is only in the 12 inch PowerBook, which is always feature poor in comparison to the 15 and 17 inch (crappier video card, 100 base thernet instead of gigabit, only firewire 400m mini DVI out instead of DVI and S-Video out, backlit keyboard, etc). And if you think you're going to be playing doom 3 or half life 2 on it in a few months time, can i borrow your magic time machine? i'd look to go to the lunar amusement park next week.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  35. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead?

    They do, at the same time discontinuing it. Go to an Apple Store this week and you'll surely find some new, unopened last-generation powerbooks and ibooks on sale price.

  36. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by somethinghollow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 1.25 GHz eMac is a steal at 749$ with your college discount. Mine is serving me well, and it is a 1 GHz. If you hate the all-in-one design, there is some good news. While you won't get extra PCI slots, the eMac does have 4 channels of IDE (instead of two), can do display mirroring out-of-the-box (dual display with a little software hack). With a little work / modding, you could get past the all-in-one ness and have a pretty nice desktop.

    If all-in-one is okay, then you should have no other complaints. The price is right for all the apps / great OS / great hardware. Besides, it's easier to move around than a monitor + box. That is important if you move from room to room every couple of semesters.

  37. Temperature woes by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Informative

    A caution to anyone who'd likely buy one of these new PowerBooks: may your lap beware!

    I own one of the "older" 12" G4 PowerBooks (867 MHz), which I absolutely adore, but it has heat issues. The main heat venting location on the case (that I've found) is the bottom rear of the machine. This means that if you're sitting down with it on your lap and you're wearing shorts, prolonged use (3+ hours) may result in warming to the point of extreme skin discomfort. This isn't usually a problem, though it's something you become aware of after the first couple of times you accidentally scald yourself. With the increase in speed, however, the speedy processor would cause an even higher temperature level, barring a radical change to the way in which heat is vented (which is not apparent from the official specs).

    Mercifully (in a way), a semi-recent update changed the fan kick-in temperature to a lower threshold, meaning less built-up heat but a lower battery life. Expect the batteries on the new PowerBooks to not quite last as long as they're listed as, though they'd probably last long enough as is. For a college student like me, just having them last through class so that I can go back to my dorm and plug in for the evening's homework is fine.

    I'd still buy one (if I had the money and needed a new computer), though I'd be careful to do most of my work on a table.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
    1. Re:Temperature woes by kakapo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is true of the first generation 12'' PookBooks, but is much less of a problem is the second generation models (and the newly released ones are the third generation).

      There are two 12'' 1GHz models in my household, and they never get uncomfortably hot -- neither is used for gaming, but I do a good deal of development and numerical computation on mine, which means the CPU can be pegged at 100% for lengthy periods. The fan does kick in fairly regularly though.

    2. Re:Temperature woes by Morgahastu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to have the first version of the 12" PowerBook, the same one you speak of.

      For financial reasons I had to give it up and then I managed to get another one a few months later just after the second revision came out (1ghz, 256mb standard, usb 2.0, fx5200) and the heat issue was nearly gone alltogether.

      It's still noticably warm but it's no longer _hot_.

      As a general rule, stay away from first versions of any new hardware, in this case the new PowerBook enclosures.

      Sure I'd love to get a G5 powerbook as soon as they come out but I would wait until the second or third revision before buying one.

    3. Re:Temperature woes by d_p · · Score: 1

      I have found that prolonged use of my 12" PB on my lap results in sweaty crotch and legs.

    4. Re:Temperature woes by OlivierB · · Score: 1

      Well they didn't miraculously pull out more capcity from there batteries. Nor did they find a black hole for dumping the heat.

      In fact motorola made an announcement about a month and a half ago about it's new line of G4s. Faster and less power hungry. By OHm's law if it consumes less power than it should radiate less heat!

      As we say in French CQFD (What needed to be prved)

      --
      Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
    5. Re:Temperature woes by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mercifully (in a way), a semi-recent update changed the fan kick-in temperature to a lower threshold, meaning less built-up heat but a lower battery life. Expect the batteries on the new PowerBooks to not quite last as long as they're listed as, though they'd probably last long enough as is. For a college student like me, just having them last through class so that I can go back to my dorm and plug in for the evening's homework is fine.

      Should you ever want to change the fan-temperature back (meaning more battery life and less fan noise), you can install Silent Night using Pacifist (Silent Night's installer doesn't always work right).

      I for one couldn't stand the fan being on all the time, but then, I use my PowerBook on a desk most of the time, and I found the heat kind of plesant during the winter. YMMV.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    6. Re:Temperature woes by Lurker · · Score: 1

      Are you certain you're using it correctly?

    7. Re:Temperature woes by dmccarty · · Score: 1

      So you're the guy they were talking about!

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    8. Re:Temperature woes by fritter · · Score: 3, Funny

      The main heat venting location on the case (that I've found) is the bottom rear of the machine. This means that if you're sitting down with it on your lap and you're wearing shorts, prolonged use (3+ hours) may result in warming to the point of extreme skin discomfort.

      If you're spending a hot summer's day sitting down with your laptop for three uninterrupted hours, you probably weren't using anything down there anyway.

    9. Re:Temperature woes by pdwestermann · · Score: 1

      Good thing you didn't get one of those penis-burning dell models

    10. Re:Temperature woes by plj · · Score: 1

      For me the issue is the fan, not the heat, so I changed it back instantly. Note that (at least when I last cheked) Silent Night downgrades AppleADM103x and AppleADT746x .kexts back to the version shipped with OS 10.2.8, when all what you need to do is downgrade AppleADM103x.kext to the version shipped with OS 10.3.0 (update to 10.3.1 did not alter it).

      To do this, you need to extract the kext from Panther's install medium - you can naturally use Pacifist for this, but you can also do it with command line tools shipped with OS X (as Pacifist is shareware). I have done it using command line, but I don't remember anymore how I did it - Google for it. ;-) The hardest part in whole process was to find the right package from install medium.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    11. Re:Temperature woes by seamelt · · Score: 1

      If you notice Apple and many other companies no longer refer to Portable computers as laptops. They refer to them as "Portable Computers" because you are not supposed to use them on your lap because of the heat and the fact that it prevents the machine from disappating as much heat (especially powerbooks) Also FYI if you want to make it generate less heat you can go into your energy saver system preferences and reduce the processor performance (you may feel less manly but it will generate less heat and give you more battery life)

    12. Re:Temperature woes by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Well, he said he used a 12" Powerbook, not a DELL Latitude as mentioned in the article.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    13. Re:Temperature woes by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Then stop looking at porn already!

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  38. Computers getting faster ... who woulda thought? by gkuz · · Score: 5, Funny

    In keeping with a 50-year-old trend, the latest computers from [insert name here] are faster and more powerful than the previous generation. Wow. There's news.

  39. Damn, they're making them faster? by Slashdot+Hivemind · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can't use the "I don't want to start a holy war, but" troll anymore?

  40. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by mac+os+ken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Part of the reason you cant directly compare is because of the processor achitecture. PowerPCs and x86 based processors have differing binaries/commands/structures/etcetera. Photoshop is one of the few products on both the Mac and Windows platform that is almost identical in code and function. You'll notice in comparison between the two platforms Photoshop is a common program used.

    --
    .deviatefromtheabsolute.
  41. Re:5200's? by stilwebm · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is, as far as i recall, the first time that apple has offred a video card option in its laptops.

    It is not an option. If you click on one of the links so generiously provided in the post, such as the PowerBooks link, you can see that the option is either get a 15" or 17" PowerBook with an ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 or a 12" PowerBook with an NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200.

  42. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Informative
    They just don't offer it to everyone through the Apple Store.
    Actually, usually there is a "Previous model" entry on the Special Deals part of the Apple store (no link, stupid store uses session IDs embedded in the URLs, but it's usually on the left or right of the Apple Store page with a big, red, "Save" "tag" on it.)
    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  43. Re:1.2Ghz by iBran · · Score: 1, Informative

    Uh-huh... and here's a brand-new 1 GHz x86 laptop that sells for $800 MORE than the 1 GHz iBook...

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Airport also evolved by mirko · · Score: 1

    There's a new Airport 3.4 available and a third AEBS which supports Power Over Ethernet.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  46. CRAP!! by bahamat · · Score: 1

    I bought my 1.0ghz iBook for $1499 to weeks ago!

    1. Re:CRAP!! by bahamat · · Score: 1

      And now I feel even more stupid for clicking submit two seconds after I realize I can't spell the word two.

      This day is not starting out well.

    2. Re:CRAP!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      more than 10 days?

      or are you rounding up?

      if it has been 10 days, go now and return it for a new one.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:CRAP!! by bahamat · · Score: 1

      Acutally, I was rounding down :-(

      To be exact, today is the 15th day. I wonder though if they'll just give me my $200 back.

  47. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The local CompUSA is trying to hawk a 500 MHz icebook for $1000... It's a loaded machine, too. 10 GB Hard Drive. CD Rom, 128 Megabytes of memory. And it runs 9.2.2 like a dream.

  48. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by Morgahastu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because a benchmark of a modern FPS game is a terrible way to benchmark the processor since most of the work is dependant on video cards.

    Here's is something from a post I made somewhere above concerning speed compairisons:

    --------

    I have the previous version of the 12" PowerBook running at 1ghz and it's noticably faster than my p4 1.5ghz. I'd rate it as feeling about the same as a 2.0ghz p4.

    So I'd say the 1.5 would be about a 2.8 or 3.0ghz pentium.

    While we're on this topic I'd like to point out that Macs feel much faster than they actually are because of the superb multi tasking and UI response under heavy load.

    When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

    On the other hand, my Mac can have 20 apps running and encoding a video at the same time and the UI still responds beautifully.

    This is why using a Mac is a great experience, you so rarely get frustrated at it because it just works.

    ----

    FYI it has the same NVidia FX5200 the new ones have and it plays all the current games very well (Except the super high end FPS games like Ut2004...playable but not that enjoyable). Anyway, anyone who intends to do serious gaming on a laptop is a damn fool, even more so on a Mac laptop.

  49. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by carou · · Score: 1

    Because the CPU isn't the only expensive component.

    They can't make new-but-slower iBooks very much cheaper than the current bottom of range. You ask for a lower price because of the slower speed, but the price difference you want is more than the saving they could make by using a cheaper CPU.

    Even if Apple didn't have to pay for the CPU at all I don't think they could build the rest of an iBook for $600.

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Re:Speedbumped? Speed Increase? by skinny.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Speed increase' is no better. If there's more speed, why is it in a crease?

    Perhaps 'road hump' doesn't mean gettin' some in the car anymore.

  52. Why doesn't BMW sell the 2002 3 series anymore? by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I surely wish BMW would sell me a 2002 3-series instead of the improved 2005. I don't want to buy a used one, I just want to buy a new old one. I mean, surely they keep all those old parts around.

    Dude, warehousing old graphics cards, HDs, etc costs money and would actually increase Apple's Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). If they then dropped prices, they would have slimmer margins in both directions (lower revenues, higher COGS).

    I got my dad to buy a Apple refurb iBook and save $300. It works great, has no physicial defect and as far as I can tell, is identical to a new one with three $100 bills stuck in the DVD/CDR combo drive.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  53. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by bwy · · Score: 1

    Sometimes they raise the price a bit, I think. Like when they went from G3's to G4's in the iBook series. But, I was happy about that option. Couple hundred bucks bought a faster processor, combo drive, double the RAM, included 10.3 (brand new at the time), etc.

    But, I get your point. Seems like people pick a baseline market price and build the technology to match the price.

  54. No G5, and the worst part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is the apple apologist. Go ahead mod this down, but its true.

    You go to the Mac boards, and its all the same "Gee, a G4 is all you need, you don't need any more speed".

    The G4's FSB is only running at 167mhz. That's pathetic in 2004. Its why the G4 chip never seemed all that fast and why the G5 kills.

    If you find yourself saying "You don't *need* a G5...." slap yourself. You're apologizing for lackluster products instead of voting with your wallet and not buying.

    HEY APPLE! My money is waiting until you get a G5 and build a goddamned 2 button mouse into the case. Don't make me buy an add-on mouse to a laptop to cover up your inability to adapt to the times.

    1. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't really want a mouse built into my case like you're suggesting. Seems like it'd be pretty hard to roll around on my desk...

    2. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      You go to the Mac boards, and its all the same "Gee, a G4 is all you need, you don't need any more speed".

      Don't know what boards you've been hanging out in, but the Mac zealot boards I've been in have been screaming for G5 laptops since the desktops were announced and have been spreading rumors about them coming out "next week' for the last five months.

    3. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Let's play feed-the-troll!

      "Gee, a G4 is all you need, you don't need any more speed".

      What do you, personally, need more speed for? The only thing I ever do that taxes my G4 is video editing and running VirtualPC. Everything else is more than fast enough. A G5 would probably help the video editing, but it's not something I do every day, and I'm happy to just set everything up and leave it doing the rendering while I'm asleep. VirtualPC is about PII 266 speed, and I don't really need it to be any faster (sure, it would be nice to run it at P4 speeds, but if I really needed to do much x86-specific stuff I'd have bought an x86 laptop).

      The G4's FSB is only running at 167mhz. That's pathetic in 2004. Its why the G4 chip never seemed all that fast and why the G5 kills.

      Right. I need a faster chipset, because that would, uh, use more power and drain the battery quicker. Oh, and make the machine hotter. Seriously, when was the last time you did anything on a laptop that was limited by FSB speed?

      build a goddamned 2 button mouse into the case.

      Have you ever actually tried using a trackpad with two buttons? I still haven't found one that's comfortable. The trackpad in the PowerBook is amazingly nice to use. Oh, and I have yet to encounter a Mac app that actually needed a second button.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by hattig · · Score: 1

      The trackpad on the Powerbook (and presumably the iBook) can be used to simulate 2 mouse buttons and two wheels in addition to standard movement by the addition of a third party driver. All the things are configurable as well.

      It is called Sidetrack. It is free. It should be an option in the OS but Apple are odd when it comes to such things.

    5. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      osx is designed for a one button mouse and i never miss the second button on the laptop. Cick and hold somethimse actas as rt. click and control click (which isn't hard to do on a laptop since the touchpad is close to the keyboard) always acts as a rt. cick. I wish they had a 2 button touvhpad, but that would be a huge difference and goes agains the "Just Works" philisophy, so i understand where they are cooming from. And with osx, it not that big a deal.

    6. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by amichalo · · Score: 1

      You need to understand what is going on.

      According to Apple's last earnings call (April 15th) IBM has had difficulty keeping up with demand for 90nm G5's, thus a shortage for completing PowerMac and Xserve orders.

      Apple is not happy with IBM and both companies are working to remedy the situation.

      That Apple has more demand than supply is not a good situtation in that some % of potential customers will go else where. Still, Apple has responded by releasing what they do have avaialble - upgraded G4 systems - for the % that would rather use the G4 technology than the G5.

      I agree - Apple should get their stuff together and produce the G5 laptop people areclammoring for. But in the absence of the G5 chips to make it happen, I am glad they are offering these great upgrades.

      I do take issue with both your suggestion that by not having a "need" for a G5 I am somehow fooling myself. I think it the other way around - someone who uses a computer for web surfing, e-mail reading, the occasional office document, and other light tasks is fooling themselves that they "need" a G5.

      I also agree with the one button mouse issue but I have no problem buying a two button wireless scroll mouse for less than $50. I always did the same for my PCs (Gateway and dell both use pretty lame mice IMHO).

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    7. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by javaxman · · Score: 2
      the *worst* part is that I'm replying to a message from a troll who can't figure out how to use a mouse that my two-year-old has completely mastered.

      Having said that, I *want* a G5, and IBM should figure out what's wrong with their Fishkill plant and start cranking those suckers out, but until then... I have to admit I can't think of a single *good* reason why I need anything faster than my old 800Mhz G4 flat-panel iMac... poor Apple, I probably won't be buying another computer until my 2-year-old demands his own computer... at which point he'll get the plenty-usable iMac. He probably won't need his own since he has his own login anyway... I won't have a new computer at home for years and years. They'll have G6s before I can justify buying a new machine.

      for what purpose do you need something faster than a 2Ghz PentiumIII, in all seriousness ? No, enterprise server uses don't count here, I'm talking about home machines... fast enough to look at web pages, launch a word processor, and play some games is, well, fast enough. Anyone who says different is either trying to sell you something, or just trying to impress you with their l33t boXen ( since they can't get a girl to talk to them ).

      My 800Mhz iMac is not only fast enough to do all of the above, it's also plenty fast at editing DV movies and authoring DVDs. These new machines would be even better, and portable as a bonus... what exactly were you claiming as the reason why you'd not buy a G4 laptop?? I'm not sure that reason makes sense, that's all I'm saying... don't get me wrong, I like PCs just fine, my *last* machine was an HP, but I'm not sure your dissing Apple is justifiable.

    8. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by nathanh · · Score: 1
      What do you, personally, need more speed for? The only thing I ever do that taxes my G4 is video editing and running VirtualPC. Everything else is more than fast enough. A G5 would probably help the video editing, but it's not something I do every day, and I'm happy to just set everything up and leave it doing the rendering while I'm asleep. VirtualPC is about PII 266 speed, and I don't really need it to be any faster (sure, it would be nice to run it at P4 speeds, but if I really needed to do much x86-specific stuff I'd have bought an x86 laptop).

      Hand in your geek badge, your membership is revoked! You can never have a fast enough processor.

    9. Re:No G5, and the worst part... by javaxman · · Score: 1

      the troll didn't mention video editing, did he? Besides, I find my 800Mhz iMac edits video just fine, that's the purpose I bought it for so many years ago. Sure, it'd be nice if it got the job done faster, but the stage that is slow is in creating a file for burning onto the DVD, something that's not going to be a 5-minute operation any time soon, no matter what hardware you're buying. I get the process started and go do something else, big deal...

  55. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by grue23 · · Score: 4, Informative

    resellers including smalldog.com and macmall.com often offer older models (ones that are totally gone from the apple store) for more reasonable prices.

  56. Airport Extreme standard on Powerbooks now by zaren · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dunno if anyone else noticed this, but wireless networking is now STANDARD in the Powerbook line, while you have to spend the extra $100 to get the AirEx card in the iBooks.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:Airport Extreme standard on Powerbooks now by pknoll · · Score: 1
      Yep, which acutally makes the new Powerbooks $99 cheaper than they were before.

      Good deal.

  57. I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I sort of laugh at Appledot these days. I mean a $1,299 eMachines Athlon 64 laptop with widescreen and Radeon 9600 video is ignored, but a laptop three times the cost that is not as feature rich or powerful not only has to be mentioned in rumor, and then again when it is announced. How about mentioning the new 4 way Opteron HP server just announced, or eMachines fine laptops? I'm XP, XP 64, Mandrake 64, and FreeBSD 64, and I can cluster three of them for the price of one of the Apples!! Heck, even Compaq has an Athlon 64 notebook for $1,299 in Best Buy now, but people are drooling over a small speed bump from Apple? I don't get it. Anyway, I think I'll buy a 7200 RPM Apricorn drive, swap out my 3000+ for an Athlon 64 3400+, and upgrade to a GB of memory and load levels faster in UT2004, Farcry, and Battlefield Vietnam. After those upgrades the cost will be closer to the Powerbook in cost except that I get to Ebay the parts I replace, and I get to enjoy 2.2GHz of 64 bit power! You see you can upgrade the Athlon 64 laptops yourself. Can you do that with a Mac, or a Dell for that matter? Nope.

    --
    ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    1. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

      You seem to be under the impression that Apple is a hardware company. They're not. They're a software company that makes its money from hardware sales. They're no different from Cisco, except they have a better user interface.

    2. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Your sig is ironic.

      So your whole point is that your 64b Athlon computer is only good for games?

      How about XSan? Motion? FCP? FCP HD? DVD SP? Shake? Logic? BLAST?

      You forget that some people actually make money with their machines. :)

      You also forget that for some people, especially those that earn something in the $40 to $50 an higher an hour range, time is money. Linux, BSD, and Windows is too expensive, and strangely enough, Macs, with their plug and play nature, are cheaper. Literally, if it takes me one day to set up something in Linux, and 10 minutes on my Mac, that's the difference between $500 spent/wasted and $10 spent. Over the course of a month, then, a Mac will have paid itself off.

      Especially when you're talking about a $1,400 iBook. Make a DVD? Insert a disk, arrange the menus, and hit burn. 20 minutes later you're done. Make a movie? Plug in the camcorder, import video, arrange the video, and 30 minutes later you're done. Send the DVD off for replication, make 500 copies, and start on your next project.

    3. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      and your laptop has a 1.5 hour battery life, is 3 inches thick, and weights about 10 pounds.

      yeah, that would be why no one cares about your laptops.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 2, Informative

      a laptop three times the cost that is not as feature rich

      Not feature rich...?

      Does that include the built in Bluetooth? DVD-burner? Thin size and quality design? Firewire 800? Optic Keyboard Sensory? Gigabit ethernet? Mac OS X? (incl. iLife, etc.) and long battery life?

      --

      What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    5. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by jjares · · Score: 1

      Wow, those things must be selling fast... according to the link you just posted, it went up to $1499 instead of the cost you put. It has almost de same specs as a 12" powerbook, I rather have the smaller one, and with a dvd-burner.

    6. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by argent · · Score: 1

      You're running AMDZone.com on a laptop?

    7. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by wehe · · Score: 1

      Just in case you want to run Linux on your AMD64 laptop, there are some installations reports. You may also compare these experiences to Linux on Apple PowerBooks and iBooks.

    8. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by Isldeur · · Score: 1

      You also forget that for some people, especially those that earn something in the $40 to $50 an higher an hour range, time is money. Linux, BSD, and Windows is too expensive, and strangely enough, Macs, with their plug and play nature, are cheaper. Literally, if it takes me one day to set up something in Linux, and 10 minutes on my Mac, that's the difference between $500 spent/wasted and $10 spent. Over the course of a month, then, a Mac will have paid itself off.


      Hey! It's the Steve Balmer argument! Come on guys, which way is it. What do I believe? Is mac better than linux because it's easier or is linux better than windows because it isn't?

    9. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by switcha · · Score: 4, Funny
      Make a movie? Plug in the camcorder, import video, arrange the video, and 30 minutes later you're done. Send the DVD off for replication, make 500 copies, and start on your next project.

      So, you're the one who was responsible for the last Matrix.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    10. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by douthat · · Score: 1
      I'm a happy mac owner, and while the parent is mostly true, I would like to raise a response to his assertion Make a DVD? Insert a disk, arrange the menus, and hit burn. 20 minutes later you're done.

      I have an 867Mhz 12 G4 PowerBook with a DVD burner, and an old 1.6GHz Dell P4 with a video capture card.

      As it turns out, the process is more like:
      1) Import video from camera to Dell in DVD formatted MPEG-2
      2) Transfer MPEG-2 files to Mac to throw into iDVD
      3) Drag MPEG-2 file to iDVD and read error message: Unsupported File Type
      4) try it again, and read the same message
      5) search help files and come up with the following docs:

      Unsupported movie and graphic formats
      Movie and graphic formats that work with iDVD

      which say MPEG-1 is not supported, and "You can't add MPEG files to an iDVD project because they don't contain standard video tracks.", and "You can add most video or image files supported by QuickTime to your iDVD project."
      Given the last quote, and the fact that it's pretty well known that QuickTime, out of the box, doesn't support MPEG-2, I thought that maybe purchasing QT6 MPEG-2 Playback would solve my problem

      6) purchase said playback plug-in
      7) try importing again. read error message. curse
      8) purchase QuickTime Pro, hoping that will solve the problem.
      9) curse when it doesn't
      10) try importing the video into iMovie to see if that will work
      11) curse when it doesn't
      12) call AppleCare support and find out that importing MPEG-2 into iDVD is illegal
      13) curse
      14) shut down Mac OS X out of spite
      15) launch Ulead DVD MovieFactory on the Dell which came free with the video capture card
      16) Add videos, arrange menus, click next twice, click burn
      17) 20 minutes later, you're done.

      True story. iDVD doesn't support MPEG-2. this means that if you have MPEG-2 video, you will have to convert it to MOV (which happens real-time at best on an 867MHz powerbook), then import into iDVD, which then in-turn, re-encodes it into MPEG-2 and burns to DVD. With an 867MHz processor and a 1x DVD Burner, this takes several hours. I won't even mention how much hard drive space it takes or that the video is degraded after codec swapping.

      I don't know about you, but I find it a little absurd that a program which purportedly burns to DVD will not accept DVD formatted MPEG-2. Maybe I assume too much.

      To think I spent $19.99 on QT MPEG-2 support, $29.99 on QTPro, $49.99 on iLife for the newest version of iDVD and all of them together couldn't get the job done reasonably.

      --
      She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
    11. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by infinii · · Score: 1

      I really don't understand why you are bragging about the 64bit machine when you don't even have a 64bit Radeon driver to use it with.

    12. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Projects have budgets too, you know. 10 days and XXX dollars. If you can't finish in 10 days, and your contract penalizes you, then what? And how about bonuses if you finish early?

    13. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you have heard of Best Buy? They routinely put it on sale with rebates to make it $1299. That is where I got mine back in Feb. Where is that 64 bit Apple laptop again? I'll put this emachines head to head with any mac laptop out there, and it is superior. Yeah, DVD burner, firewire, 15.4 inch widescreen, and microdrive/memory readers built in. That is right kids. I can copy things to my 1GB microdrive, then pull it out and slap it into my athlon 64 small form factor from Shuttle which also has the memory readers. Quite a combo those two are. Guess what? Both of those together cost less than the 15" powerbook.

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    14. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

      hahahahahahhahaah, keep wasting your money. Does the G4 have 64 bit? Integrated memory controller? HyperTransport?

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    15. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by wchin · · Score: 1

      Lots of these laptops have issues with getting stuck at 800MHz when on battery. At 800MHz, the laptop gets decent battery life. You are supposed to be able to force it to 1.8GHz all the time, but with a 80+ watt thermal design power spec, you won't have much battery life. Unfortunately, there have been reports that it doesn't work... 800MHz is all you get on battery.

      The firewire port is a 4 pin, unpowered variety. No FW800.
      No DVI on the monitor output.
      No gigabit ethernet.
      No Bluetooth.
      Radeon 9600 vs. 9700 in the PB.
      No WPA support on the 802.11g.
      1.6" thick, 7.5lbs weight, it's big and heavy.
      No Mac OS X. It also comes with Windows XP home... not Pro (another $180-200 for the upgrade).

      You're not likely to run this machine in 64 bit mode anyways... there is almost no benefit in doing so.

      It sure is cheap though. As a luggable, and the fact that eMachines doesn't actually build it, makes it a good value. But it isn't in the same class as an Apple PowerBook 15".

    16. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gaming is now bigger than movies.

      Is that why I'm buying a Powerbook in a few moths to use at college (for communications, as in radio/tv/film. As in video.)?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    17. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by 0utRun · · Score: 1

      "ignorance is bliss." This what Best Buy and eMachines count on for sales

    18. Re:I'll keep my 64 bit laptop by wchin · · Score: 1
      1) Import video from camera to Dell in DVD formatted MPEG-2


      Mistake right there. The question is, why did you do this? Why would you purposefully use a lossy codec for source material and then complain about video quality degradation?

      BTW, iMovie takes DV format which is what you get when you grab video over firewire from a firewire equipped camcorder. This makes the workflow much easier for most people - hence that is the way iMovie works. Final Cut Express and Final Cut Pro support more import formats. iMovie expressly does not support taking in anything other than DV format - it's the way 99% of the audience will get their source material. Grabbing it and converting to MPEG-2 before working with the material is just plain idiotic. It's an artifact of the cheap video card you bought in that Dell.

      Anyways.. if you insist on doing this, you could have used the free VideoLAN VLC to do the transcoding back to DV. The MPEG-2 playback component you bought enabled you to transcode also and you noticed that it degrades quality. But of course - that's why people don't do it that way.

      If your source isn't something that has firewire output, then you can get an analog to firewire bridge or a PCI analog capture card. There exists USB versions, but the quality loss is significant. Seems like you paid for a video capture card in the Dell and didn't for the Mac.

      You're doing something that most people won't do... and expressly not supported - it all comes down to iMovie only taking DV format (btw, which the Dell can produce). That's a choice that Apple made with their low cost editing suite and most people don't have a problem with that. The problem of transcoding is the same, regardless of software or platform.
  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check Barefeats.com who test the G5 against an Athlon, a P4, an Opteron and various other Macs. from http://barefeats.com/p4game.html
    One "handicap" that Macs may never overcome: Direct X. Most PC 3D graphics apps are optimized to run best in Direct X graphics mode, not OpenGL. For Windows PC apps, OpenGL is an afterthought. When those apps are converted to run on Mac under OpenGL... well you get the picture.
  60. iBook RAM increase by h0ss · · Score: 3, Informative
    One thing I'm particularly excited about with the new iBooks is that their maximum RAM is 1.25 GB, instead of 768MB.

    This is a HUGE difference for me, since the stuff that I'm most interested in doing isn't so much CPU intensive as RAM intensive. I can live with just about anything, but under 1GB of RAM was a deal-killer on the iBooks.

    For me, this changes everything.

    1. Re:iBook RAM increase by wheresdrew · · Score: 1

      It's been verified by multiple users on the Apple support forums that all the iBook G4s support 1GB SO-DIMMs. Apple doesn't publicize that fact though.

    2. Re:iBook RAM increase by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The previous iBooks (and I think some of the G3 ones) could also support a single 1GB SO-DIMM in addition to the onboard memory (128MB?). They were not advertised as being able to, since no one was selling 1GB SO-DIMMs at the time they were launched. Even now, you will pay about 4 times as much for a 1GB stick as you will for a 0.5GB one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  61. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd love a Corvette for 15 grand, but instead of just building the same thing every year the keep changing it. Those jerks.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  62. grrrr... by sir_ze0 · · Score: 1

    I guess I will have to take back my 15" powerbook I bought last week then. I guess it's the same effect when I wash my car, it rains later that night.

    Oh well. I never thought I would be this happy with an Apple. Four years ago I would've beat myself up for saying that. If Apple keeps its fast paced direction for OS X, I won't be looking back (well at least at Windows, my long time marriage to Linux will never go).

  63. Re:5200's? by Jythriadoc · · Score: 1

    I think he was referring to the video card not the Apple Latptop in general. Seeing as he specifically refers to replacing his video card, which, while not completly impossible for a laptop, is rather rare.
    -1 points for failing reading comprehension.
    -1 additional points for then calling him an idiot.

  64. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by cowbutt · · Score: 2, Informative
    How many Dell, HP, Compaq, graybox etc.... hardware rollouts are greeted with the same kind of fervor that Apple computer hardware announcements inspire?

    Actually, the same thing happens with PeeCee/commodity hardware too; try and find a new 10GByte disc for 10GBP, or a new Celeron 500 for 5GBP. This is particularly annoying if you want to put together some ultra-cheap new machines (for an undemanding user such as Aunt Tilly, say) without resorting to the skankiest hardware out there (which is probably still more expensive than obsolete stuff would be, if it were still available).

    --

  65. New iBook memory config by gabe824 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The iBooks have had their memory limit raised to 1.25GB. Better still the soldered in chip is now 256MB instead of 128MB, this gives all the default configurations a free slot to upgrade with. This resolves what was for me, my biggest gripe about my G4 ibook.

  66. Re:5200's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That this is a video card for a low-end consumer laptop, not a 1337 game system, maybe?

    Hold on a minute there. One moment people here claim that all Apple hardware should be compared to medium or top-range PC stuff, and that this makes them reasonably good value for money. And then, when people do exactly that, it is suddenly unfair because the Apple is really a low-end system?

    You cannot both have your cake and eat it. Either the 12" model is quite overpriced as a "low-end consumer" machine at $1600-$1800, or it's got a really shitty graphics card for a medium/high range machine.

  67. Other iBook changes by cheide · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looking at the specs, it looks like the following have also changed on the iBook line:

    - The default memory doesn't use up the expandable SO-DIMM slot anymore. This previously made upgrading the memory annoying because it was split into 128MB internal and 128MB in the slot, so you were forced to replace memory rather than just add.

    - 512KB of L2 cache instead of 256KB.

    I got a 1.0GHz iBook a few months ago, but I'm still happy. I wouldn't have waited just for these minor boosts. The SuperDrive may be an option now, but at that price ($280 extra CDN) I'd still rather get an external FireWire drive.

    1. Re:Other iBook changes by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Most (or all, depending on who you ask) external DVD drives don't work with iDVD. Just a heads-up.

  68. Enough nonsense, really by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 5, Funny

    First a disclaimer: I am a Mac fanboy. I've got one, I love it and I reccomend it to everyone who's looking for a new computer.

    But what the heck is with all the sexy nonsense? Since when did we start humping Macs and iPods?
    "Sexy bits of computer art that both inspire lust..."
    Lust?
    Sure their products might be sleek and very well designed, but to call them sexy and lusty ALL the time? I'll take good ol' T&A over hardware any day.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Enough nonsense, really by ian+mills · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never heard of the Mac for mac Lovers. . .

  69. Re:Keep tricking yourself. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

    A 1.4 GHz G4 doesn't compare to a 3.2 GHz P4, this is true. Hence the statement "MHz for MHz".

    But a 1.4GHz G4 is noticeably faster (to me, at least) than the 1.5GHz P4 my brother's computer has (I use his as an example because I don't actually own any Intel chips; AMD and IBM chips in the computers I own).

    Since the original poster was asking for a comparison, I gave him one.

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  70. Speed is not how fast the CPU waits by phooka.de · · Score: 1

    Let's compare. Doing what I usually do (listening to music, ripping, burning, editing ID3-tags; Surfing; Office), I have 3 computers to do this:

    iBook G3 600MHz
    PowerBook G4 1.25GHz
    Pentium4 2.4 GHz (with 2GB of RAM!)

    Honestly, I can work almost as fast on my iBook G3-600 as on my P4-2.4. But I'm even faster than that on PowerBook.

    So for me, the surplus in CPU-speed on the P4 outweighs the usability-advantages of OS X on a CPU that's one generation behind and 1/4 the clocking. It's by far not enough to outweigh the advantage of OS X on a comparably advanced CPU with half the clock-speed.

    Now, did that help? Propably not. All you can do is compare for yourself.

  71. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    (no thanks, refurbed units)

    Apple refurbs actually have a very good reputation. I think AppleCare (which have an excellent reputation too) is the same price and length as brand-new machines too.

    It's not like a third rate brand that simply reships the thing without testing.

    Note: I do not own a Mac, I just know some people that do, and they have bought refurbs. One even got like 300MB more memory than was advertised for the unit.

  72. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by easter1916 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Search for "refurbished" at the Apple Store for great deals. These are usually returns, got a 1GHz G4 17" with 512MB RAM, 60GB drive, superdrive, Airport Extreme, etc., for $2300 there about two months back. In perfect condition, no less.

  73. Get a second opinion... by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    I'm not attempting to say you are wrong, as I have no experience with that model. However, I wanted to offer a second opinion.

    I recently (January) purchased a 15" PowerBook and can say it is the coolest running laptop I have ever owned.

    Previously I owned a Sony VIAO which was decent for temperature but had serious hardware failures 1 month out of the year long warranty (for which they wanted to charge me $2700 to repair). After that I bought an HP notebook, which was so hot that I'm sure I would have melted the skin off my legs had I ever set it there more than once beyond the first time.

    Now, combined with wireless and my PB, I constantly recline on the couch in front of the TV with the laptop. No heat issues whatsoever. In fact, when I'm wearing jeans a barely notice much difference in temperature.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Get a second opinion... by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Agreed... I have a 1GHz TiBook (circa August 03) and I've found one thing: if you keep a CPU monitor up, and kill processes that are using more CPU power than you want them to use, Odds are you lap will be completely safe. (I highly recommend MenuMeters for CPU monitoring.)

      If I had to guess, I would say 90% of the people who complain about short battery life and hot PB's probably have some process running that takes up a ton of CPU and therefore is heating up your book.

    2. Re:Get a second opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not attempting to say you are wrong, as I have no experience with that model.

      For what it's worth, the heat "problem" was specific to the 12", which is both very dense and cramped internally, and most importantly, doesn't have an always-on fan. The single, tiny, fan in the 12" only comes on at high temperatures.

  74. What about screen resolution. by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use an IBM Thinkpad that's got a 14" screen with 1400x1050 resolution. That's more pixels than the 17" Powerbook on the same screen that Apple's only fitting 1280x854 (Powerbook) or 1024x768 (iBook) on.

    I'd happily take a G4/500 with a Radeon 7500 if I could get decent resolution with it. I'm sure Sonnet will have a CPU upgrade for me when I need it, but it's a lot harder to upgrade the screen.

    The crummy screens on Apple's current low-end lineup is why I'm upgrading my almost 10 year old Beige Powermac (upgraded to G4/466 and 768M RAM) instead of getting an eMac (17" screen, but it's a really ugly last-century shadow mask) or iMac (15", 1024x768) or a notebook. I don't need a red hot machine and I can't imagine giving up my 1280x1028 (up to 1600x1200, if I wanted) aperture grill display (a nice Trinitron clone by CTX, under $200) for the eMac or iBook...

    1. Re:What about screen resolution. by argent · · Score: 1

      My Thinkpad has more pixels than the 17" Powerbooks (1400x1050 > 1440x900) on a screen the same size as the 1280x854 powerbook or 1024x768 ibook.

      There is no downside to >1280 resolution for you. Good god, man, you're using a Mac: you have native PDF rendering so you can set the text any size you want and it still looks good. The worst a higher resolution screen would mean would be better letterforms and slightly smaller window decorations. You'd get the gem-like clarity of some of Apple's older models back.

      And at the same time, would you consider going to LESS than 1280? If you want an iBook or a 12" Powerbook, you have to.

    2. Re:What about screen resolution. by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting to take into account the difference in DPI between a macintosh and a PC. Seriously, check it out.

      Look at 1024x768 on a mac, then on a PC. You'll notice that it feels like you've got a lot more room on the mac for some reason.

      --
      - Sherman
    3. Re:What about screen resolution. by argent · · Score: 1

      There's no difference between DPI on a PC and a Mac. There are differences in the user interface that sometimes favors the Mac, but occasionally favors Windows: for example, when you maximize a window on Windows you get 100% of the screen dedicated to that window, on the Mac it just makes it as big as possible.

      So... 1024x768 on a Mac may feel like more room. To you. It may feel like more room to me, even, but that doesn't mean it's enough room. And I am entirely familiar with BOTH environments.

      I am, this instant, typing at a G4/466 running Jaguar with an external 17" aperture grill CRT. If I tap the switchbox I'll be typing at a PC using the same tube and display. I have the same setup at work with a 1280x1024 16" flat panel. The difference between either these displays and a 15" iMac or an eMac is phenomenal.

      On the eMac with its shadow mask tube objects are always fuzzy, no matter how you set the resolution, because the individual dots of phosphor are little round blobs arranged in triangles. I can set the eMac up to the same 1280x900 I'm running at right now, and the difference between this inexpensive trinitron-style tube and the just-plain-cheap eMac shadow mask is phenomenal. There's no software that can compensate.

      On the iMac or iBook, well, there's just plain not enough pixels. When I got this box I had to run it at 1024x768 for several months before I was able to replace the Rage Pro video with a Radeon, and it was simply too cramped. Oh, it's usable, but damn... if I want "just usable" I can get "just usable" a lot cheaper elsewhere. :)

      Steve Jobs once said he wasn't ever going to produce another low-end headless Mac because he didn't want ugly monitors on nice Macintoshes. It's ironic that to do this he put an ugly display in that nice monitor.

  75. Good news for us two by jjares · · Score: 1

    Oh, well... I bought my new powerbook 45 days ago, but anyway there are good news for us two, even though they don't come from apple.

  76. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by ozric99 · · Score: 1
    While we're on this topic I'd like to point out that Macs feel much faster than they actually are because of the superb multi tasking and UI response under heavy load. When I am encoding a video on my Windows machine I can't do anything else on my computer, if I try to click something it takes about 30 seconds for the menu to popup.

    While I don't doubt for one second what you're saying, the same UI response could be achieved on Windows by dropping the priority of the video rendering task - I do it all the time with Vdub. Set it from Normal to Low and you'll get your responsive desktop back without noticing any meaningful loss of render speed. Unless, of course, you've got other tasks running that hit the CPU a lot, in which case you might want to batch your tasks or play around a little more with their priorities. Granted, messing with task priority is not the most user-friendly way of managing things in Windows, but it's there and it works :)

  77. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by maggard · · Score: 1
    I am a real big fan of Apple, but I am continually wondering just how they stack up to the PCs
    Who the hell cares?

    "It's got-wide bore cams, dual exhausts, and a microflake red paint finish"

    I mean, beyond the most insecure fanboy when does the raw speed of a modern PC matter?

    1. Does it run 'fast enough'?
    2. Are the tools I need available?
    3. Can I be efficient with this?
    4. Will it hold up long enough to pay back it's investment?
    5. Thus, is it a good value for me?
    What does it matter exactly how many clock-cycles this thing burns off while waiting for you to type in your next /. posting?

    We reached the point a few years ago where, for most folks doing most tasks, any computer was good enough. Yes if you're doing huge math problems, or 3D rendering (same thing really) or other similar comparatively exotic activities then CPU-to-CPU comparisons (and motherboard architecture and bus bandwidth and memory latency etc.) are interesting metrics.

    But for 99% of folks, and even for ~90% of /.'ers, clockspeeds only good for bragging rights and extreme future-proofing of machines.

    Computers are toasters now and everything on the market is gonna be good enough for the vast majority of folks. The important questions now are not "Can it do it" but "How best to do these, and how can I, with my workflow and my available skillset and my needs, best get them done?"

    So look at what you use a computer for, what your time and efforts are worth, what tools you use and need and have investment in, and judge if Product A can do what you need, if Product B can too, and then which is a better value for your particular situation, clock-speeds be damned.

    Oh, and these new laptops ROCK!

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  78. Re:5200's? by NeGz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Granted they're not the fastest cards available, but they're not absolubte rubbish for gaming.

    My current laptop (not a Mac) has a 64mb Geforce FX5200 Go. I've been using it over the last few weeks (combined with a Pentium M 1.5 and 512mb of PC2100 DDR) to play Farcry, which seems to be a pretty graphics intensive game.

    I've got texture detail set on high with everything else set on either medium or low. The game may not be running at a hojillion frames per second, but it's completely playable with no annoying choppiness or lag.

    Incidentally, my notebook's graphics card was advertised as being 64mb (128mb reserve.) Anyone know what this means? Can I buy a memory expansion card for it? There doesn't seem to be a BIOS option to dedicate it more memory.

    Note: I have actually got the card overclocked to FX5600 Go clockspeeds, something I don't normally do, but it doesn't seem to be effecting temperature or stability in any noticable way, so I may as well take the bonus. :)

  79. Re:5200's? by fupeg · · Score: 4, Informative
    it claims DirectX 9 capability
    Hey news flash, there is no DirectX on a Mac, it is a Microsoft technology. On a Mac, it's all about OpenGL. Nvidia has generally fared better at OpenGL than ATI, even though ATI's 9500/9700/9800 is generally considered superior than Nvidia's FX line.
  80. Wrong, the worst part is... by jared_hanson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    your ignorance.

    I have both a dual 2.0 GHz G5 and a 1.25 GHz 15" PowerBook G4. The G5 is without a doubt faster, but for the typical user and his/her uses, it doesn't offer much. The G5 excells at video encoding and also compiles larger code bases much faster. However, for typical uses (web browsing, word processing, etc.) there is not much of a performance gain.

    As for your two-button mouse argument: TRY IT! I figured I wouldn't like it much, but I find it to work out quite well. Now, I always have one hand on the keyboard, which makes me operate my computer much more quickly and efficiently. My experiences with Apple lead me to believe that if they are doing something, there is usually a damn good reason for it, and that reason is usually right.

    So, instead of loudly proclaiming your ignorance and demand Apple do things your way, I suggest you open your mind to "thinking different" and begin to realize that things can be better than the way you've been ingrained to beleive.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Wrong, the worst part is... by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Look at it from Apple's point of view -- The PowerBook G4 was introduced in Jan 2001 -- that means it is now completely depreciated for many owners. Which means that Apple should be trying to sell them a new machine.

      Now is going from 500Mhz to 1500Mhz in 3 years a "compelling" upgrade for most users? I think not. Way behind Moore's Law of Computer Marketing. And I agree with the AC that the memory bus is almost laughably antique.

      Many Mac users do use their PowerBooks for Video Editing. Very few users justify a $2500 laptop with web browsing. Apple should be putting something out that will give the hard-core users new machine envy (and they probably would be if they had the G5 chips).

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:Wrong, the worst part is... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      One button mouse problem solved and more, look iup Side Track

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Wrong, the worst part is... by pangloss · · Score: 1

      One button mouse problem solved and more, look iup Side Track

      linky linky

    4. Re:Wrong, the worst part is... by KnarfO · · Score: 1

      I always have one hand on the keyboard, which makes me operate my computer much more quickly and efficiently

      I use a PC w/ 2-button mouse, and I still keep one hand on the keyboard... for alt-tab!!!

      ...allows me to change screens much more quickly and efficiently when the boss walks down the hallway!

      ;-P

      --


      "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  81. Re:Anyone want to buy a used iBook? by c4Ff3In3+4ddiC+ · · Score: 1

    Tell me about it, I bought my 12" 800MHz ten days ago!!!

    --
    *twitch*
  82. Re:5200's? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    yeah, i went back and saw that, and made a new comment. i have no idea why this comment got modded up to interesting when it was wrong, but my other post corerecting it didn't. oh well.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  83. I was writing this DMCA takedown notice by acceleriter · · Score: 3, Funny

    and all of a sudden, the computer was like BEEP BEEP BEEP. Now I have a Powerbook and crank out C&Ds in record time, with no crashes.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  84. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by EddydaSquige · · Score: 1

    you can, apple just doesn't advertise it. They hide these options on the side bar under "special deals". Also many times if you go into an apple store and ask them about discontinued items, if they have them in stock they will sell them at a lower price (I got a 10 gig iPod for less than the mini price that way right after the minis came out).

  85. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by mbone · · Score: 1

    Also, now would be a good time to GO TO THE APPLE STORE in person.

    I have gotten great deals on older units once the new ones come out - ask if they have any returns still in the original packaging.

  86. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So what you're saying... If Windows boxes were made to look more funky and sold at a higher price, then Windows will be much easier and faster to use? Wow! I'm calling Bill Gates right now...

  87. I BOUGHT AN IBOOK YESTERDAY!! Need Advice by DingoBueno · · Score: 1

    I was the sucker who bought an ibook yesterday. Not only yesterday, but 15 minutes before closing. They want a 10% restocking fee because I had an airport card installed. And the worst of it is that I bought it because my powerbook flaked. This should be the last time I get burned by apple. What the hell should I do? They're offering me a $49 "price protection" rebate. That's barely worth the gas to get there. I'm heated....

    --
    ascii art
  88. The7 stages of grief of highly effective people by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Shock: "What? G4s in the IBOOKS?
    Denial: "This must be some poorly researched article on /."
    Bargaining: "Maybe I can return my powerbook and get an iBook..."
    Fear: "What if Apple won't let me return it because its a build to order??"
    Anger: "Those SOBs KNEW and didn't tell me before I spent all that money!"
    Despair: "Now my Powerbook will have no resale value when I have to eBay it for the new G5 laptops!!"
    Acceptance: "Wait a minute - this this Powerbook kicks ass! The girls want to be with me, the guys want to be me, and I consistently get benchmarks higher than a dual 1 ghz G4 Powermac. The Airport Extreme rules, the battery life is lengthy, it runs nice and warm and winter is coming! I guess I did ok..."

    Fast forward one year. "The G5 laptops are OUT?!?...."

    (This is a repost of an old post of mine, but as relevant today as it was then...:)

  89. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by lowe0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The $200 laptop. Here's why:

    For $1000, you can build 5 $200 laptops and sell them at $800. Gross $4000, net $3000.

    For $1000, you can build 2 $500 laptops and sell them at $1500. Gross $3000, net $2000.

    So, in your hypothetical case, you should determine demand on the lower-cost laptop, make enough to fill that demand completely, and then use the rest of your manufacturing capacity to make the high-end model.

  90. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by BAM0027 · · Score: 1

    Consider "open box" purchases and/or get to online stores promptly for current inventory. You may find some of what you're looking for.

  91. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by twodiabolo · · Score: 1

    They have done. Looking at the UK prices, the 12" Combo powerbook is now 1149 GBP, which is 150 quid cheaper than it was. It now has an airport card and 60gb HDD (rather than 40) as standard, so that's another 80 gbp off the price I paid for mine.

  92. I think a 20% increase... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 1

    in 9 months is pretty respectable. You can argue the veracity of just how fast 1.25Ghz was in comparison to the X86 ad nauseum, but if you were a mac user and 1.25Ghz was very fast for you work, 1.5Ghz is very, very fast.

    It is rather sensless to argue 'orders-of-magnitude' since there is a quantifiable improvement. This is not a 1.25Ghz P4 bumped to 1.5Ghz.

    I'm sure Dell fans would be glad to hear the 2.8Ghz 9100 was bumped to 3.2Ghz in 9 months...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  93. Re:I BOUGHT AN IBOOK YESTERDAY!! Need Advice by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    I'd write a paper letter to Apple, saying how I'd bought my first and last Mac, and would be telling everyone who would listen about my experience. But before that, I'd check to see if my credit card company offers some kind of price protection (American Express does, for example).

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  94. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My (highly subjective) experience is quite similar, but I'd like to point out two things:
    1. AltiVec. A lot of Mac code is AltiVec optimised. This means making explicit use of the vector libs, rather than just hoping the compiler will auto-vectorise for you). Much less code on x86 is optimised like this, since you have to support MMX, SSE, SSE2, 3DNow!, 3DNow2! etc, so most code either uses MMX as a lowest common denominator, or doesn't use the vector unit at all. This means that such code will run 2-4 times faster than on an equivalent x86 machine. The QuickTime MP3 and AAC encoders are examples of this.
    2. Memory. OS X likes memory. Most of the time you don't quite applications in OS X, you just leave them running with no windows open. If you do close them, then OS X will try to leave the application binary in the disk cache for as long as possible so that you can reload it quickly. The disk cache is quite aggressive. I was browsing through a load of PDFs on a CD the other day, and part way through, the CD span down. It had cached the entire CD (or at least all of the PDFs I looked at after it had spun down). Adding more RAM will have a huge effect on your perceived speed.
    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  95. iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The previous generation iBook 12" was slow (800MHz G4) and had a low RAM ceiling (640MB) with 256k L2 cache on-chip.

    The iBook G4 12" announced today is no speed demon, but at 1GHz, it's fast enough for its target user (students/education professionals), and the 512k L2 cache certainly helps. With up to 1.25GB DDR RAM, the machine is basically identical to the previous generation 12" PowerBook.

    Add an Airport Extreme card and upgrade the disk to a reasonable size (60GB), and you can get the machine for $1273. The 12" PowerBook, meanwhile, costs $1600 in more or less the same configuration.

    Is there a really compelling reason to buy the 12" PowerBook if you're Joe Student? Doesn't seem like it. Graphics are nominally better, but the nVidia 5200 isn't so hot, is it? There's a 333MHz speed bump, which nobody will notice during normal use. Bluetooth is included, but you can add it to the iBook for $50 if you need it.

    So I wonder if the current iBook rev. will take a bite out of PowerBook sales. There are few (if any) "must have" features on the PowerBook 12", and the current iBook speed and RAM capacity are finally on par with other modern machines.

    My money would be on the iBook, I think.

    1. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget that the iBook also has longer battery life (6 hrs vs. 5 hrs, more like 5:30 vs 4:30 in practice).

      Also you can get an iBook with SuperDrive for $1499 (14"). That may be the real killer for some users since the cheapest SuperDrive powerbook costs $1799 (12") and isn't much faster.

    2. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm a college student who will be buying either a 12" iBook or a 12" PowerBook as soon as I get a chance to try them both out in person. (I'm only referring to the 12" models in this post.) Before this update, I was very much leaning towards getting an iBook rather than a PowerBook. The iBooks used to be much better than the PowerBooks in terms of bang for your buck. However, having seen these new models, I'm almost assuredly going to get a PowerBook.

      With my education discount, I can get the PowerBook for $1399 and the iBook for $1155. The PowerBook is the stock 12" without the Superdrive, and the iBook is the base 12" with a combo drive, Airport Extreme, and a 60 GB HD. (The Airport and bigger HD are BTO options to put it on par with the PowerBook. So now I'm looking at a $250 difference, or ~20% if I look at it that way. For this 20% more in cost, I get a 1.33 GHz G4 vs a 1 GHz G4 (33% improvement), a 167 MHz system bus vs a 133 MHz system bus (25% improvement), a nicer video card (double the VRAM), and other random PowerBook niceties like the ability to do monitor spanning without OpenFirmware hacks. Not to mention the PowerBook is lighter and smaller in all 3 dimensions. The only real advantage I see in the iBook is the greater battery life, but the 5 and 6 hour quotes are to be believed, the difference is all but negligible.

      While the iBook is still an excellent option, I just feel I'm getting more bang for my buck with the PowerBook. This is a laptop that's going to last me a long time, so I think the extra money spent will be well worth it in the long run.

    3. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Rxke · · Score: 1

      "There's a 333MHz speed bump, which nobody will notice during normal use"

      Heh, man, that hurts! I'm typing this on a freaking 350MHz G3....

      Only shows how fast it goes, with processorspeeds... Moore's Law etc, sounds boring, until you think about it. When I bought my G3, a 50MHz speed bump was not bad at all, now it would be below the 'tech talk' treshold, ever seen a processor advertized as X.X5 GHz lately?

      Amazing times

    4. Re:iBook cannibalizing PowerBook sales now? by Spatula+Sam · · Score: 1

      If 1024x768 resolution sounds a bit tight to you, then I would deffinitely get the powerbook, as the iBooks do not have full support for using an external monitor. An external display is only useable in mirroring mode, which constrains things to the iBooks rez. This is basically a result of apple crippling the hardware to keep it from canabalizing the pro line. However, an open firmware hack available at this website partially restores that capability, letting you span the screen (but not fully disable the laptop display, effectively halving your vram for games and the like).

  96. desktop update next week? by frankie · · Score: 1
    Xserve went G5 not long ago, eMacs got bumped last week, today all the laptops speed up. So now it's time to speculate about desktop updates...

    Obviously iMac needs more MHz than last september's models, but I don't see G5s there until fall. Also, the GPUs definitely need bumping (currently 4MX low or 5200 high).

    But more important is the PowerMac G5, also stagnant for the past 6 months. Everyone is looking for exactly one number: 2.5 GHz. Bumping the low-end mobo to PCI-X and ditching the FX5200 would also be nice.

    1. Re:desktop update next week? by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... but I don't see G5s there until fall.

      SJ at the release of the G5 stated clearly that they "IBM and Apple are today announcing that within 12 months we'll be at 3GHz". You can hear/see this yourself in the WWDC 2003 video at timecode 1:52:00

      Unless things continue to go horribly wrong at IBM, that means the G5 will hit that mark in June.

      Note that Steve stated they would be at that speed, not announcing that speed. I would expect, based on that statement, that such systems should be shipping by July at the latest.

      At this point, I suspect that Apple will forgo any interim speed bump or upgrades for the PowerMac and is simply stockpiling the 3GHz processors in anticipation of a major buying spree once the new systems are released.
      I recall speculation after the WWDC last year that Steve's statement might mean there would be no major updates until a year later. That speculation seemed to be dismissed quickly by most.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  97. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    At least he won't have to spend money on any more games.
    *badum-tish*

    "Lots of games, like... <mumble>Photoshop...</mumble>"

  98. Too stubborn for two buttons by hode · · Score: 1
    In the words of Epic's Ryan Gordon:

    Basic bottom line, and this goes for every thing that Apple produces, from hardware to UI to programmatic APIs to Pepsi promotions to online services: they either get it really really right, and it's a dream to use, or they get it really wrong and are too stubborn to ever change. There isn't a happy medium, ever, with the notable exception of the leap from OS9 to OSX.

    As much as you and I want a two button mouse standard, we won't ever get it from Apple.

  99. Re:5200's? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    Have fun with viruses. LOL. These games are more than good enough to play the latest mac ports of the games. Have you ever looked at the spec sheets of mac ports? Their minimum reqs are usually way below the minimum reqs on the PC side. Direct X is a pig and NT (XP) cannot task switch/manage memory with a damn. I play WCIII and WCIIIFT just fine on my first generation 12" pbook and I burn/author DVD's just fine too.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  100. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    Except those cost estimates are absurd... -

  101. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by 503 · · Score: 1

    Apple occasionally dumps old stock (some refurbished, some new) at Dovebid.com, an online industry liquidation auction house (they're the uys that handled the Enron liquidation).

    When Apple dropped the CRT iMacs I managed to pick up a new, fully loaded 600MHz iMac for $600 US. The same machine (refurbished) at the Apple store was $900.

  102. Very true. by Distortions · · Score: 1

    1: I can't believe the mouse the computer ships with would keep you from buying it if you wanted it. Have you ever not bought a prebuilt PC because it had a crappy mouse?

    2: Single button mice are good for new users. They have no idea what a "contextual menu" is, therefore it is just another confusing complicated button they will undoubtedly press.

    3: I understand more on laptops. Having a one button mouse on laptop is retarded, because it can't be reasonably upgraded.

    I think the solution is simple. Apple should ship ALL macs with 2 buttons but make a recessed switch on the bottom of the mouse/laptop to toggle.

    In the "Off" mode ( default ) both the left and right buttons act as a normal mouse press (mouse1).
    In the "On" mode the left and right buttons are the normal (mouse1, mouse2).

    Personally, I use a 5 button scrolling optical mouse.

    I can see why they stick by it so much though.
    My dad's iMac has the "the whole mouse is the button" apple optical mouse.
    He seemed to have a lot less problems using it with no scroll/right click to accidentally press.
    Additionally, it solves the "Why isn't it going? oh, my finger wasn't quite on the button" problem.
    Great for most people, bad for expert computer users.

    You can't see it because using a mouse is like breathing for you. Try to get your grandmother to use a mouse or understand a modern cellphone.

    --
    Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
  103. I Love Apple! by ThisGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I ordered a PowerBook 1.25ghz 15" SuperDrive on Friday. I awoke this morning to see that my order had been cancled, but re added. I was pretty confused until I saw this post on slashdot, and I checked some emails, and bam! They switched my order for me! Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly.

    1. Re:I Love Apple! by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

      Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly.

      Easy, becayse Monopoly isn't a company, it's a board game.


      ...and Microsoft doesn't sell computers ;-)

    2. Re:I Love Apple! by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      I ordered a PowerBook 1.25ghz 15" SuperDrive on Friday. I awoke this morning to see that my order had been cancled, but re added. I was pretty confused until I saw this post on slashdot, and I checked some emails, and bam! They switched my order for me! Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly.

      They like to try and sell through all older models as much as they can. You're benefiting from their manufacturing and sales model, not from benevolence on their part.

      On the flip side, when I ordered my 30g iPod, I had to wait nearly two months for it. It was shipped directly from the Chinese factory, so that they could commit all units before releasing the 40g units at the same price. The same supply model that got you your upgrade made me wait to receive my 30g while 40g were being shipped next-day from within the US. People who ordered just a couple days after me got larger units sooner.

    3. Re:I Love Apple! by bfg9000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly.

      Because Microsoft doesn't make PCs?

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    4. Re:I Love Apple! by ThisGuy · · Score: 1

      ah-hem, i believe what I meant was you wouldn't see this type of customer support/convienence from M-soft.

    5. Re:I Love Apple! by kalel666 · · Score: 1

      "Why do I think this wouldn't have happened with a company whose name begins with M and ends with -onopoly."

      Damn you Parker Brothers! Daaaammmmnnnn Yoooouuuu!

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    6. Re:I Love Apple! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      So now it's Apple's fault that nobody has the brains to make a working Mac emulator for PCs?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:I Love Apple! by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Sure, like they did when there were emulators for 68k based Macs, and like they do today for Mac-on-Linux. Sorry, you and your lamer friends can't even manage to write an emulator for PPC - that's why you have to use the lame evil-Apple-is-after-us excuse.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    8. Re:I Love Apple! by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      I love Apple too, but for another reason: I bought a snow-white keyboard from them, it arrived at the end of the week. After unpacking it and using it a bit, I saw that the spacebar key was a bit crooked. It was also a bit annoying for me to use, as i type a lot in my profession.

      I called Apple, and they said it was not problem for me to exchenge the KB at a local Mac dealer. I went to the Mac dealer, and they were asshats to an extreme extend (The store is going south fast, as they are using all the time to blame Apple instead of taking care of customers. I hung around the store for ten minutes as the second in line for service, and listened to the four people in the offices playing Snood and complaining to their bosses about how Apple rips them off. That might be true, but you still need to SELL something if you're in the selling computers-thingy).

      As I could not exchange the KB there, instead they got angry with me, I called Apple again. They were shocked to hear about the treatment and sent me a new KB. This was friday afternoon. On monday morning, the new KB had arrived. I unpacked it and installed it, getting ready to send the old one back. After installing it I discovered that it lacked the Æ, Ø and Å keys. And I kinda need them to write norwegian.

      So I called Apple again, and talked to a kind customer service woman. She heard my story, verified it in their log and said: "God, this is embarrasing", and sent a new KB next day delivery. This was Monday afternoon. Tuesday morning, the new KB arrived, with all the keys, none crooked. But it was the 2002 model, not the 2003 model.

      So, again, I called Apple.

      This time I said: "Look, I'm not complaining. There has been some fuckups, but your behaviour has been kinda superb in handling it. But the KB is not the one I ordered. I can, however, keep it for a small reimbursement"
      The representative said: "What kind of reimbursement did you have in mind?"
      "Well, I could really use an Apple Mouse"
      "And how much do you want to pay for it?"
      "Well, about 30 USD sounds fair"
      "And would that be a wired or a wirless one?"
      "You know, the wireless is veeeeeery nice..."
      "I see. Let me talk to my manager about this, please hold"

      I held the line for two minutes, before she returned. "Do you have Bluetooth in your Mac?" she asked.
      "Yes, it's a new Powerbook" I responded.
      "In that case, I'm sending you a new Bluetooth Apple mouse, free of charge as a was of saying sorry for the mishaps." she said.

      After giving her my CC number (without exp. date), she brought up the old order and added the mouse to it. five minutes after, I brought the old order up in Safari and saw that the mouse was due to be delivered soon.

      This is, bar none, the best customer treatment I have ever recieved. The fucked up, yes, but really, really went out of their way to unfuck it. And I got a new Bluetooth mouse to replace the piece of crap that is the Microsoft Bluetooth mouse.

      And I like typing on the 2002 KB better. Win - win - win...

  104. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by dr.badass · · Score: 1

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead?

    Because eventually, so the theory goes, you will cave in and buy at the price that Apple sets. They're not trying to "get rid of" PowerBooks -- they're interested in the money made. Why should they sell you one for $600 today if you might be willing to pay $1200 six months from now? One of the side-effects of doing so would be that you would be less likely to ever be willing to pay more. Multiply that by the thousands that would love to scoop up a 'cheap' PowerBook and you can see how big a dent that would make into their income.

    --
    Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  105. Re:1.2Ghz by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    And the `average' battery life on that machine is 1.5hours. On an iBook it's 3-4. I think I'd be more than willing to pay $800 less for better battery life (and a bigger screen. And OS X)...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  106. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US, but here in Canada the new models have been accompanied by a significant price drop. The new 17" PB G4 is about the same price the old 15" SD model was.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  107. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Samiel · · Score: 1

    It's quite simple, it's because Apple is a monopoly.

  108. Apple Likes and Supports 2 button mice by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    FCP really likes 2 button mice i think, and Shake requires one to operate well. It's just for their lower apps they see no reason

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Apple Likes and Supports 2 button mice by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      That and both FCP and Shake are developed from aquired technologies, and were not written from the ground up with a one button mouse design.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  109. Sexy Laptops by miller701 · · Score: 1
    But what the heck is with all the sexy nonsense? Since when did we start humping Macs and iPods? "Sexy bits of computer art that both inspire lust..."

    About the same time Apple reps started pronouncing SCSI (most say scuzzy) "sexy". That's when.

  110. What the hell is this "serial port" thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    That's so 7-years-ago.

  111. Apple Loan = Tool of the devil by Del+Vach · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since I'm in complete agreement with the opposing viewpoints that...
    • If we knew what was being released in six months, we could hold off on current purchases to get a better value
    • The only reason Mac users bring this up is because we follow Apple's lineup so closely some of us feel they OWE us this
    • It must suck trying to sell what you've got on the shelf when half your potential consumers want the next model regardless of what the current one is
    ... I'll just pipe in and bash MBNA. Yes, they may advertise a 6.99 APR with no interest for 6 months (think those were the current terms), but:
    • When you're approved for an Apple/MBNA loan, they make a point of not mentioning what APR you actually GET- think 24%
    • They don't send the paperwork on this loan for close to two months, so if you want to get on the ball and start making payments during the initial 6 mo. period- too bad!
    All that being said, I actually order a 1GHz 15" PB when they were first released, then cancelled the order based on rumors of a redesign, and ended up ordering the 17" I'm on now. Just had to pay off the sleazy MBNA loan with a credit card (sigh).
  112. RTFSS by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Informative

    SS = "spec sheet"

    The 15" and 17" PowerBooks include a single Type I & II PC Card slot, and always have. The iBooks don't have it as a means of feature differentiation from the PowerBook line. The 12" PowerBook doesn't have it for obvious reasons.

    Of all the people I know with PowerBooks, absolutely none of them have ever used a PC Card in one. Why would you, when every PowerBook since about 1998 has had everything you'd add via PC Card already built-in?

    The only thing I can think of anymore that someone might have a use for is a memory card reader-- but why buy a PC Card one and limit yourself when you can use a USB one on any computer?

    ~Philly

    1. Re:RTFSS by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of machines smaller than a 12" that have PCMCIA. Hell, my Newton MessagePad has TWO PCMCIA slots.

      Yeah, but your Newton 2x00 series *doesn't* have a full complement of external ports, an internal hard drive or CD drive.

      ~Philly

    2. Re:RTFSS by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      Well, I would prefer a PCMCIA card over USB for the "built-in-ness" - a Bluetooth PCMCIA means not having to plug in a dongle for Bluetooth, for example. GPS, another wifi card (for wardriving), Bluetooth, upgrading my old TiBook with USB 2.0, media readers, and I'm sure a wealth of other things I haven't thought of. ....that said, I have yet to actually *use* the PCMCIA slot on my PB.....

    3. Re:RTFSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What obvious reasons?

      iBook + Shiny + $1000 = PowerBook 12

    4. Re:RTFSS by Bob+Hearn · · Score: 1

      I use my PC card slot all the time, to pull photos off my IBM microdrive. Yeah, I could use a USB card reader, but I don't need one. And the PC card interface is faster.

      Still, if it would save cost/weight, I'd happily give it up.

    5. Re:RTFSS by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 1

      I've used the PC Card slot in every PowerBook I've ever owned. Back in the '90s, I travelled a lot and used the slot for a modem. I haven't used a modem in years, but I've had a memory card reader in the slot since I bought my first digital camera in 2001. Why "limit" myself? Because dongles suck and I hate carrying them around. Anyway, both of my machines are laptops and have PC Card slots.

      Oh well - needs differ.

      -Mars

    6. Re:RTFSS by Drakino · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of anymore that someone might have a use for is a memory card reader-- but why buy a PC Card one and limit yourself when you can use a USB one on any computer?

      Because the PC card one fits inside the laptop. The USB one doesn't. Thus, I can put the PC card in, then carry my Powerbook around in a slim case and still be able to read memory cards. USB, I'd have to carry it around with me separately.

      Having the PCMCIA slot is a good thing. I've also used it to wardrive, since the Airport Extreme still doesn't have open source drivers. I also know of video options for the slot, allowing people to have 2 23 inch cinema displays running off their Powerbook.

    7. Re:RTFSS by nsayer · · Score: 1
      Of all the people I know with PowerBooks, absolutely none of them have ever used a PC Card in one.

      Then you don't know me. I have a Linksys WPC54G in my TiBook. This gives me much better reception than the built-in antenna and an upgrade to 802.11g using Apple's own AirportExtreme driver kext.

    8. Re:RTFSS by ps_inkling · · Score: 1
      Of all the people I know with PowerBooks, absolutely none of them have ever used a PC Card in one. Why would you, when every PowerBook since about 1998 has had everything you'd add via PC Card already built-in?
      SCSI? CompactFlash or SmartMedia card reader (as opposed to a USB none-in-one dongle)? Second modem? Second Ethernet or 802.11x network card? Firewire (for older PowerBooks)?

      There's lots of things that aren't included on a PowerBook that can be plugged into that PCMCIA/CardBus slot.

      Still, there are some ports no longer used by OS X, like the IrDA port (for a modem connection, yes; but not as a serial port or for AppleTalk, (grumble grumble)).

    9. Re:RTFSS by 0utRun · · Score: 1

      I agree, except I used a PC card adapter for my microdrive to keep it from killing my camera's battery.

      Then I found a reader for $10 :^P

  113. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Moofie · · Score: 1

    I could make up a different set of numbers that just as conclusively proves the opposite.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  114. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by JonathanF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    you must like having cards jutting out of the side of the laptop!

    I know I don't. the PC Card slot isn't as useful on a 12" PB when you already have Bluetooth and 802.11g out of the box. what would you put in there that isn't either already handled by the PB or could be done through USB (such as hooking up a camera to transfer photos)?

  115. Re:5200's? by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

    Have fun with viruses. LOL.

    I run Windows, Linux, and OS X, and have never gotten a virus on ANY of these.

    If you have a legal copy of Windows and update it regularly, and run Mozilla instead of IE and OE, you'll be fine. The situation is even better on OSX, and even better than that on Linux, with Debian automatically upgrading security fixes daily for me, and really really fast response times from the Linux guys putting out patches.

    If you're not a newbie or a fool, you likely won't get viruses on ANY system.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  116. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    www.ebaymotors.com
    You can get a nice Vette for 15k.

  117. MAC or Mac? by JonathanF · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never knew so many people played games with Media Access Control IDs!

    perhaps you mean "Mac" as in Macintosh? ;)

  118. Price drop by devin15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only did they beef up the processor and videocard they also dropped the price by $500 (cdn)

  119. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ahrm.

    So why is it you need PCMCIA? Is the current Cardbus slot not sufficient? It's like PCMCIA, only much faster and with a wider bus.

    Oh, and it's backwards compatible.

    Let me guess -- didn't read the specs? I understand.

  120. Re:Computers getting faster ... who woulda thought by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

    Actually, I seem to recall reading that Moore's law is older than computers - extending back to old adding machines, abacus's (abaci?), maybe even older. No idea where I read that though, feel free to disregard it. :)

  121. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

    Serious Reply:
    Parent was implying they'd like to buy new, not old from some stranger. Cheap iBooks/Powerbooks are available on ebay as well.

    Non-serious Reply:
    If only ebay sold a sarcasm detector.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  122. IBook First Impressions by trust_no_one · · Score: 2, Informative

    Checking out the new IBook on the Apple site I see some major changes that far outweigh the slight processor speed increase.

    Memory now maxes out at 1.25 GB instead of 640MB.
    Available Superdrive
    Built in Airport Extreme in 1.2Ghz model

    Downsides:
    Still only Firewire 400

    I think this makes these the best IBooks yet. It may just be time to upgrade. These are now the best values in the Apple lineup.

    --
    I'm not an actor, but I play one on tv.
  123. Re:I BOUGHT AN IBOOK YESTERDAY!! Need Advice by Bikini+Kill · · Score: 1

    You didn't get burned by Apple, you got burned by whatever reseller you bought it from. Had you ordered it from the Apple Online Store yesterday, or even last week, they would have automatically shipped you out the new model for the new price.

    I realize that doesn't help you very much at this point, but maybe it will be useful in the future... Sorry about your situation though, that sucks :-(

  124. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Same reason there's no $199 ultra-low-end Apple product... margins. Compete right in the middle (or at least not the low end) of the bell curve, where the market supports better margins.

    What do you want more -- an Apple and the OS X OS, or a cheap laptop? You can get a desktop eMac NEW for $799. That's a steal. Order one through a school and it's $50 cheaper.

    Powerbook for $600? Ha. Not even an iBook.

    MAYBE you can find a 700MHz iBook on eBay, used -- or dealmac.com -- for $600. I've seen 500MHz ibooks for sub-500 some months back. These systems are suitable for UNIX or Mac development, which is what I use mine for.

    Refurbs are great if you have a warranty.

  125. Were you happy with it when you bought it? by DavidinAla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were happy with the product and the price you paid when you bought the iBook, then quit worrying about today and just accept that the timing happened the way it did. Take their $49 rebate and have a decent dinner with somebody.

    There will ALWAYS be "better deals" after you buy. You can only worry about what things were like when you bought. If your reseller won't happen to help you as a courtesy, there's nothing you can do other than irritate yourself further with anger or worry. It's your choice whether you enjoy your new iBook or complain about something beyond your control.

    1. Re:Were you happy with it when you bought it? by DingoBueno · · Score: 1
      There will ALWAYS be "better deals" after you buy. You can only worry about what things were like when you bought.
      That's the thing I like about apple. It's kinda like you can get it anywhere and you don't have to worry about getting ripped off. Most vendors don't sell anything too far below apple's price, so the time you waste shopping around isn't worth the potential savings.
      ...quit worrying about today and just accept that the timing happened the way it did.
      I agree. If it happened last week, I honestly wouldn't be upset. The fact that I bring it home, plug it in, go online and find that the price dropped not 12 hours later is what really, really irritates me.

      The Apple store manager swears he didn't know about the new ibooks (but somebody signed for the delivery). Which may or may not be the case, but give me a friggin break... just turn a blind eye. The computer's not even 24 hours old. Restock the thing.

      I'd really like a gig of ram in the thing (As opposed to my 640MB max). I could care less about the 67 MHz.

      Also, my girlfriend wants an iBook and an iPod. They'll get the business if they work with me.

      Anyway, I'm done ranting... God damn twelve hours you motherf..
      --
      ascii art
  126. Re:I try to understand..... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    Is the reason we don't see used Macs and big price cuts is because there is no difference??

    Apple just had a performance bump, which chances the price/value equation, so used prices are going to take a few weeks to settle to a new level. But don't expect a huge drop. Used prices are going to reflect what people are willing to pay. Apples hold their value well because for most purposes, older Macs still give very good value.

  127. Re:Anyone want to buy a used iBook? by subtillus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, I just got mine in december...

    Oh well, at least it's still cooler than the competition.

    ibook12" annecdote:

    I was complaining to my friend in a cafe the other day that when I use airport to download large files as well as listen to itunes, run word, Fire im, and a dozen other apps, my battery life only lasts for about 3 and a half hours instead of 5. He told me to go fuck myself because his computer lasts about half as long and most of that time is spent configuring his wireless card, then his computer froze up and he had to take out the battery to reboot it.

    Man I wish I owned a wintel!
    : )

  128. Re: Refurbished Apple products are a great deal. by xmason · · Score: 1

    I bought a refurb'd Powerbook 12" 1Ghz recently, and have had zero problems with it. It was in flawless physical condition (no scratches on the aluminum or anything), and other than the fact that the box has "APPLE REFURBISHED UNIT" stamped on it, you'd be hard-pressed to tell this was refurbished. It also came with all the same software upgrades that the new PowerBooks have, too (Panther, iLife 4).

    Plus, the warranty is identical to a new unit (1 year), the extended warranty costs the same as the extended warranty on a new one, and you don't need to buy the extended warranty until yours is up.

    If you can somehow luck into finding an in-stock refurbished PowerBook or iBook, I recommend buying one. The $350 I saved over a new one allowed me to pick up a new iPod and a refurbished Airport Extreme card at the same time.

    --
    I'm not cool enough to have a .sig
  129. Re:5200's? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    The new Powerbooks DO come with a 9700 (for the 15 and 17" models).

    I'd say to RTFA, but what can I expect these days on slashdot.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  130. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    I wish they'de lose that weirdo Airport Extreme slot (since that hardware only has drivers for one OS) and replace it with a PCMCIA slot of some kind. That would make the PowerBook into The Ultimate No-brainer Best Choice for laptop

    My old TiBook has a PCMCIA slot, in addition to the internal Airport slot. Do you mean that you want two PCMCIA slots?

  131. Re:5200's? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    The available option is to get 128MB or 64MB on the Radeon 9700.

    Apple also regularly offer trade-in or CTO options on the higher-end PowerMacs - you can get a Radeon 9800 Pro istead of the stock 9600 Pro on the G5 for example.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  132. How big? This gets the water! by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    "take a 15' powerpc"?? Now that's the kind of screen I've been wanting to see on a laptop. When you open that one up, everyone in the office really brings you a glass of water!! Hard to setup in tourist class though!

  133. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    the PC Card slot isn't as useful on a 12" PB when you already have Bluetooth and 802.11g out of the box. what would you put in there that isn't either already handled by the PB
    802.11g or even 802.11b under non-MacOS. For some reason, Apple or the 802.11g chip guys (I don't know which) is keeping Airport Extreme details a big secret, so nobody has been able to come up with drivers for it. Thus, I wish I could pull it out and replace it with someone else's product.

    Yeah, I could just be happy with MacOS (and maybe that's what I'll end up doing, if I buy one and if MacOS turns out to have enough security features) or use a clumsier USB thingie, but it's still a point of awkwardness.

    I'm happy to be corrected by those who point out that the 15" and 17" models are more expandable and have Cardbus slots, but I'm trying to avoid getting such a large machine; it partially cancels out the advantage of getting a laptop. I want the tiniest thing I can get. Sometime in the next 3 weeks, I need to get a portable computer of some kind, either a small (prefer 12" or less) laptop, or a Zaurus.

    The 12" PB is soo close... just not quite perfect.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  134. Re:MAC Gamers, Rejoice! LOL by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

    and RTCW, Jedi Academy, UT2k3, UT2k4, Halo and a whole slew of other recent 3d games. Not as many as the PC but many of the good ones.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  135. Damn you! by garethwi · · Score: 1

    I thought I had the Aunt Tilly contract.

  136. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by Suburbanpride · · Score: 1

    all it takes is a bottle full of tequilla, an ipod full of tunes, some nice portable speakers and I'm ready to party!

    --
    sorry 'bout the mess...
  137. ibooks and external monitors by acomj · · Score: 1

    The ibook can't drive an external monitor at greater resolution than the internal lcd (1024x768) one, unless you do some open firmware hack. Odd for a machine with lots of video ram. There is a chance it won't work with the new machines, or that apple will break your ability to use the change you made with an os update. So far apple hasn't done anything that devious.

  138. Re:Anyone want to buy a used iBook? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    See if you can trade it for a new one, or get a retro-active discount on the one you bought. You might be shot down on the first try, but a few calls wont hurt anything if you get 100+ bucks back.

  139. Re:5200's? by aastanna · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can play Halo though. My first generation 866MHz 12" plays halo fine on an external 19" monitor. You *might* be able to play doom 3 or half life 2 depending on how low you can set the video options.

  140. Sorry, you're just wrong. by JusTyler · · Score: 1

    Bzzt! I found a 15" 1400x1050 (SXGA+) notebook with Athlon 64-bit 3000+ processor, 60GB hard drive, DVD-+RW, gigabit ethernet, 54mbps wireless, for 1009 (about $1800).

    Compare this to the PowerBook, which, even ignoring the CPU difference, costing $2,499 for the equivalent features.. is way more expensive. And don't even look at the UK PowerBook prices which are way higher than even the US ones.

    1. Re:Sorry, you're just wrong. by JusTyler · · Score: 1

      Actually, when doing regular crap (i.e. not playing games) it gets just over three hours' battery time (according to TomsHardware anyway), which compared to most non-Centrino notebooks which get two hours if you're lucky.. is pretty darn good. Sure, the PowerBook is a bit sexier, but for $700 more, that should be a given.

  141. Re:WTF - this topic is hardly /. worthy... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

    Yeah and WTF is with these stories about the linux kernel beign updated? Or new processors from Intel? And really, does anyoen give a shit that the government gratned another shitty patent?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  142. you can thank me ... by wtmcgee · · Score: 1

    ... as i bought a 12" last tuesday from the apple store. i recieved it on saturday, thereby making it absolutely certain they would release a new model the next business day :)

    now, the fun of trying to see if i can switch to the new model - it's a BTO, so we'll see what happens.

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
    1. Re:you can thank me ... by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      I think if you had bought it from the online Apple store then they should have automatically mailed the new laptop instead for you (at least that's what I've heard). Live and learn I suppose. But kind of cool of them IMO.

      --
      Little Bricklets
  143. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Sleepy · · Score: 1

    The local CompUSA is trying to hawk a 500 MHz icebook for $1000... It's a loaded machine, too. 10 GB Hard Drive. CD Rom, 128 Megabytes of memory. And it runs 9.2.2 like a dream.

    Ouch. What a rip.

    I've got that exact model.. I think we paid that much for it EIGHTEEN MONTHS ago.

    While the video chip is fluid and the OS IS very smooth... it's unsuitable for games, video, and probably Photoshop. Reboots do take forever, but those are rarely needed.

    Development, web, email, and OpenOffice (X11 version) all run fine in OS X 10.2. I've yet to have the OS crash on me.

  144. Re:Well, the current 15" PB by Aquafort · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, so the 15" PB I'm using right now ran out of power almost an hour ago and I never noticed it. Oh, wait, it must be the way Mac users ignore reality that makes me believe the computer is still on and that I am somehow posting to slashdot.

  145. Re:1.2Ghz by Wiz · · Score: 1

    You need new PC servers then. No UltraSPARC can compete with a top end PC in physical raw compute power.

  146. Re:Speed Bump? Merriam Webster says. by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
    Main Entry: speed bump
    Function: noun
    : a low raised ridge across a roadway (as in a parking lot) to limit vehicle speed
    The speedbump is also a type of male piercing, which we won't go into here. Suffice to say, if you were speedbumped, you'd feel the difference.
  147. Re:5200's? by univgeek · · Score: 1

    Errr, nice try. Compare the 12" to ANY other 12" by IBM, Dell, HP, or Toshiba, not to a desktop.

    Let me know when they have a graphics card, as good as, if not better than the Powerbook, or the iBook. Most of them have the crummy Intel card, with perhaps 16MB on-board.

    The 12" is the best in class, in terms of portability, and there are people who ar ready to pay a price for portability, as opposed to performance.

    --
    All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
  148. Re:5200's? by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    If/when they're ported to OS X. I play fallout 2, halo, and jedi knights 2 all the time on my mac -- but i built a PC so i could play GTA:VC . Jedi KNights II ran fine on my 700 mHz g3 ibook, as did fallout 2. Tony Hawk Pro Skater's minimum requirements are higher than my laptop, but it runs fine on the g5. ::shrug:: I'd love to be able to play doom 3 and half like 2 on my mac, i'm just not going to hold my breath, and probably'll give up and get it for my windows boxen.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  149. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by BlackWire · · Score: 1

    The main problem has been that Apple will not release review samples to any reputable hardware review site. If they would then there would be plenty of benchmarks.

  150. Re:I BOUGHT AN IBOOK YESTERDAY!! Need Advice by DingoBueno · · Score: 1

    I bought it from the Apple store. I don't think they'd upgrade me automatically, they gotta get rid of new stock somehow.

    --
    ascii art
  151. Here's An Interesting And Timely Article by bfg9000 · · Score: 1

    Apple's designs are fine, but its build quality is poor

    As an Apple user, I have to agree with everything said in this article. I've experienced bad build quality from Apple first hand, on more than one occasion -- including the infamous paint-peeling TiBook, multiple bad RAM fiascos (Apple's own RAM installed at purchase time, not aftermarket RAM installed by me), BAD heat problems, and, most recently, the dead-after-3-weeks-iPod Mini.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:Here's An Interesting And Timely Article by VeloDrax · · Score: 1

      I'm a decade-plus Mac user and I agree that Apple's quality is hit and miss. I generally think that buyers should avoid Apple's first-gen products. My sister just bought her first Mac, a dual G5, and it's been so unreliable that she's basically had the whole thing replaced, component by component. However, I have a final-run G4 Quicksilver, which I keep running 24/7, and I've yet to have a problem with it. My buddy had a 15-inch PowerBook with the white spots. I have a G3 800 iBook that's on its second motherboard. Strangely, my Blueberry iMac was one of the most reliable Macs I ever owned. A Performa caused me to jump the Apple ship for two years. My first Mac, a IIsi, was reliable, intuitive (OS 7), and great looking. I guess a first impression does end up counting most.

  152. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The 1.25 GHz eMac is a steal at 749$

    Sure, or you could get an Athlon XP 3200 512K 2.2GHz 400 MHz FSB w/dvd-rw, 80gb 7200rpm drive, 512m, gigabit ethernet, bluetooth, 802.11g, a radeon 9200 and a 20" CRT for $100 less.

    Link?

  153. Aww crap by Snafoo · · Score: 1

    I just bought an iBook like, two weeks ago. :) It only runs at 800mhz, and, truth be told, I can feel it.

    Bummer....

    --
    - undoware.ca
  154. No scroll wheel / zone? by AmVidia+HQ · · Score: 1

    I'm considering a 15" PowerBook, but lack of a hardware scroller is a show stopper. I don't want external mouse on the go.

    Apple: I can live without a 2nd mouse button, but please add a scroller?

    --
    VIVA1023.com | Political Fashion.
    1. Re:No scroll wheel / zone? by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      I'm considering a 15" PowerBook, but lack of a hardware scroller is a show stopper.

      How is this different from the keyboard arrow keys?

      On a side note (and I didn't realize this until after I had bought an iBook) but apparently any USB mouse (that includes Windows mice, folks) works in on a MAC. Want a second button or a scroller, buy a USB mouse that has one. Personally, I use a Kensington Pocketmouse, and, oh, there's one on Amazon for $14.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    2. Re:No scroll wheel / zone? by Stanley+Marlowe · · Score: 1

      You mean something like this?

    3. Re:No scroll wheel / zone? by plj · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple laptops have ordinary Synaptic's touchpads. You just need a better driver. See here.

      Voilá, scrolling areas and tap corners (==5 mouse buttons). Also a Windows-style acceleration mode, which IMO makes the whole touchpad much more useable.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    4. Re:No scroll wheel / zone? by don.g · · Score: 1

      So, why does apple not include something like this by default? It makes their laptops so much more usable!

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    5. Re:No scroll wheel / zone? by AmVidia+HQ · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks for the info.

      --
      VIVA1023.com | Political Fashion.
  155. Can you at least be an accurate acronym nazi? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    It's KB, not kb.

    No, it is kB (but it would be MB and GB). Capital K is reserved for Kelvin. Unless you're following the IEC recommendations, in which case it would be KiB. Happy? :)

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  156. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    And you'd be right. The numbers the original poster gave were made up, which is why I noted that I was speaking hypothetically. I'm sure Apple's numbers are completely different.

  157. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by lowe0 · · Score: 1

    Hey, I didn't make up the cost estimates, the original poster did. I was simply pointing out that their reasoning wouldn't always be accurate.

  158. Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by danielsfca2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A DVD burner without a reader is useless to me.
    Are you saying you don't think a DVD burner can read DVDs? Are you saying you don't realize that set-top DVD players can be had for $35 at Kmart? Are you just afraid of the DVD standard because you love VHS so much?

    No parallel or serial port? That means I'd have to throw out all of my hardware and buy new stuff.

    What ghetto hardware do you have that needs parallel and serial ports?? You'd better say $30,000 medical-imaging systems or something, because unless your hardware is highly specialized (or essential for business but not produced in a modern version), you're at serious risk of being branded a silly Luddite. Personally, the last printer I bought that didn't have a USB port was the one I got in 1999. Next one was combo (USB+parallel) and thereafter, they're USB-only. Last serial device was an old Palm cradle (that's $30 to replace by the way, but my current Palm came with USB only.

    iTunes? I've got Winamp. It's free.

    I've got iTunes. It's free too. And it's better--it does everything the paid version of Winamp does (in terms of audio; QT does the video stuff), for free.

    Silly troll.
    Most peolpe don't want and/or need all of that stuff, and certainly don't want to pay for it.

    Correction: Most people want or need most of that stuff, and obviously many are willing to pay for it. Some people want actual modern technology on their laptops! And the only thing Wintel laptops can offer that is cheaper than a similarly-outfitted PowerBook or iBook is CELERON! Sorry, that's unacceptable to me. Celeron is just plain pathetic and I will never own a Celeron-based machine of any kind. Celeron laptops are for people who want to say they have a laptop and who just want to get on the IntarWeb and run Kazaa in their dorm rooms. Real computers are a totally different market.

    Perhaps my entire comment can just be summed up in a revision of yours:

    I disagree completely. I have no need for a parallel or serial port. I need DVD authoring. A portable video-editing studio without DVD recording is useless to me. No FireWire or Bluetooth? That means I'd have to throw out half of my hardware and buy cheap, crappy stuff. Winamp Pro? I've got iTunes. It's free. The Apple laptops are full of actual modern technology that you (and obviously, not many others) are afraid to adopt. Cheap PC laptops are designed for those with a SERIOUS budget problem, and no real demands for performance. They have their niche, but that's all it is: a niche. Many people want or need a lot of those features, and clearly 711,000 people were willing to pay for it last quarter alone.

    1. Re:Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by name773 · · Score: 1

      lol. i use a celeron. in fact, i use a 150mhz cyrix as a webserver, and that extra 100mhz pentium works great as a mail server. the extra processing power isn't really necessary for many of the people i know.
      but to each his own. esp. since you've got dvd editing/making to do... that would kill my machine :)

    2. Re:Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by siliconwafer · · Score: 1

      I am a computer engineer, and I do need a parallel or serial port. I am stuck in the fsckin Windows world, because a large amount of the software I require is win32 only. (Although, a lot of it is migrating to Linux.) Quite often, you'll buy an evaluation board that has serial/parallel to download code with to test out a new chip (such as one I recently purchased for the TI 6711 DSP chip, and also the Spartan2E eval board).

      My point: Serial and parallel are not DEAD. Perhaps they're not as widely used as they used to be, but they sure as hell are not dead.

    3. Re:Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by himself · · Score: 1

      Yuo wrote:
      >
      > >No parallel or serial port? That means I'd have to throw out all of my hardware and
      > > buy new stuff.
      >
      > What ghetto hardware do you have that needs parallel and serial ports??
      > You'd better say $30,000 medical-imaging systems or something, because
      > unless your hardware is highly specialized (or essential for business but not
      > produced in a modern version), you're at serious risk of being branded a
      > silly Luddite.
      >
      All my "ghetto" three-year old Sun servers: those 420Rs and E3500s require a pretty homely chain of adapters to hook up my laptop (a Targus USB-to-serial dongle, than a serial-to-RJ45 adapter, then a patch cable, then an RJ45-to-serial adapter.)
      Just 'cause yer standard Wintel laptop dropped the serial port doesn't mean that everything with one suddenly ground to a halt.
      That said, I'm already writing up a Purchase Requisition form to get me one o' them 15", 1.5 GHz sweeties!

    4. Re:Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      > Quite often, you'll buy an evaluation board that has serial/parallel to download code with to test out a new chip

      Ok, yep. That counts as highly specialized. I dub thee "neither silly nor a Luddite."

      But I mean, they still use handsome cabs for special romantic rides through the city, but that doesn't mean every car should come with a horse. Serial and Parallel should remain an option, or an add-on (via an adapter), as long as the hardware vendors feel the need to lock you in like that. But having those be standard, especially on portables, is silly. (Serial I can see more than Parallel though. I mean, Parallel is just an old idea for a printer port. Any other use has always been a kludge in my book.)

      And if you say "adapters don't work for my device," it's probably Windows' fault. A serial port on a USB adapter should be completely transparent to the programs using them. That's the OS's job.

    5. Re:Oh, the humanity. Think of the legacy hardware! by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure I understand the advantage of connecting to your servers via a serial cable. Many servers have an ethernet interface. Doesn't that open you up to the possibility of TCP/IP and telnet?*

      *Oops, I meant SSH. Forgot this was /. for a minute. Must...encrypt...everything...Black helicopters...coming...

  159. screens? by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't suppose the screens on the 12" model have been updated? I remember hearing that the screen model used on the 12" Powerbook and the 12"/14" iBooks was a much lower quality screen than the 15"/17" powerbooks.

    --
    ...and that's all there is to it.
  160. Wireless add-ons now standard by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (WARNING: this post has nothing to do with wanting a G5 Powerbook or complaining how a year and a half ago I bought a Powerbook and now Apple has upgraded them *again* and I am so mad. Thus, most people will want to skip this post.)

    What do you think about the standard Airport Extreme (80211.g) and Bluetooth in the Powerbooks?

    I think this is the most overlooked "new" item. Just as USB and Firewire were first standards on the Mac, is Apple again ushering in a new era of wireless connectivity by making these items standard?

    When Intel released the Centreno and those wireless ads that went with them, I never heard it having much response. Is there a high demand for these wireless standards?

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  161. huh? by Bricklets · · Score: 1

    so the /. editors froth at the mouth whenever apple makes a move. Try posting something that will generate lively discussion

    With 529 comments, this discussion only has more comments than 12 of the latest 15 front page stories as of this moment. Yeah, slashdot def needs to find something else that will generate more lively discussion.

    --
    Little Bricklets
  162. Re:5200's? by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

    I believe it means that the graphics has 64MB by default, and can grab system memory on the fly to go up to 128MB if it thinks it needs to.

  163. Speed Nudging by Frobozz0 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you would be happier with a "speed nudge" or a "speed increase?" :-)

    I agree. Speedbump is a bas term for it.

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
  164. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by bojolais · · Score: 1

    They did. Not as much as you'd like, but the PB17 now starts at $2799 instead of $2999.

  165. Re:5200's? by CatOne · · Score: 1

    Though, it appears the 6800 is changing that, in a big way :-/

  166. Re:Anyone want to buy a used iBook? by don.g · · Score: 1

    Ha! Buy mine instead! Only, er, three weeks old...

    Grr.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  167. Sager Notebooks by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    With regard to laptops... Apple's laptops alwaays come out less expensive.

    Only stupid Apple Fan Boys (tm) would speak in such absolute terms...

    PowerBook G4
    800Mhz FSB
    15" screen
    ATI 9700 128Mb video
    1GB RAM
    US$3,049

    Sager NP8790
    P4 3.4Mhz/800Mhz FSB
    17" screen
    ATI 9700 256Mb video
    1GB RAM
    US $2,972

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
    1. Re:Sager Notebooks by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Only stupid Apple Fan Boys (tm) would speak in such absolute terms...

      First of all, I have no idea who Sager is, so I'm not buying one.

      Secondly, you haven't met the requirements of the post to which you replied. Throw in gigabit ethernet (without some breakable card sticking out the side), dual-head display capacity (1600x1200 on the external monitor), Firewire 800, and so on, then compare.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:Sager Notebooks by damiam · · Score: 1
      PowerBook G4
      5.7lbs
      4.5hr battery

      Sager NP8790
      10.5lbs
      ~2hr battery.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  168. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by raga · · Score: 1
    Here is a link which I bookmarked from an Apple thread on /. a few days ago. PopMech had trouble running the benchmarks that Apple used to promote the G5, but they did do some of their own. Their conclusions, based on
    (a) HP dual 3.2-GHz processors, 2GB of RAM
    (b) Apple dual 2-GHz G5 processors, 2GB of RAM
    is provided below:
    Not being able to run SPEC tests, we turned to BLAST and HMMer, which are DNA and genome-sequence matching tests, as well as to Bibble, a batch image-processing application. The problem is that these tests do not run on Windows XP. In frustration, after running the SPEC tests on the HP xw6000 workstation, we installed Linux on the HP, which allowed us to run the new tests. And we were surprised. The G5 was 59.5 percent faster than the HP at processing 85 high-resolution color photographs totaling 684.6MB of data. In the HMMer tests (61.3MB of data), Apple was 67 percent faster than the PC and under BLAST (32.8MB), Apple was 85.9 percent faster. These results are in line with those now published on Apple's Web site.

    However, unless you plan to do extensive number crunching (a practice I indulge in from time to time:), throw all benchmark out of the window. You the user, is the "slowest" part of computer usage. Any thing that speeds that part up should be given top consideration. And as far as the overall user experience on a computer is concerned, and there is nothing that comes even close to OS X.

    cheers- raga
  169. Re: monopolies by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Wow - people sure do love to sling around the term "monopoly" without a full realization of what the word means....

    Apple really isn't a monopoly in the true sense of the word, because that would imply you couldn't buy a computer or software for it without going through them to do so. Obviously, that's not the case.

    With your logic, Ford is a monopoly too - because there's no other dealer I can buy a Mustang or an Explorer from.

  170. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    Heh, gotta love the informative mod.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  171. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by hemanman · · Score: 1

    Ok, here's a real world benchmark for ya:

    I run Warcraft III on both my older PC and my almost new iBook G4.

    It runs sluggish and slow on the iBook, I have to disable a lot of features to make it just bareable to play. On the PC it runs smoothly, with all features turned on.

    I don't know if the PowerPC is superior to x86 processors by design, but it sure does look like Blizzard dosen't take any advantage of that.

    PC Specs:
    800MHz Intel Celeron(100MHz FSB, 128Kb 2rd cache)
    BX Chipset on ASUS P2B-F Motherboard
    512MB 100MHz SDRAM
    Nvidia GeForce 2 GTS 32MB (2xAGP)
    Windows 2000 Professional SP4

    iBook Specs:
    800MHz G4 PowerPC(133MHz FSB, 256Kb 2rd cache)
    640MB 266MHz PC2100 RAM
    ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 32MB
    OS X 10.3.3

    -H

  172. Re:Anyone want to buy a used iBook? by ryanw · · Score: 1
    Anyone want to buy a used iBook? 12" G4, 800 mhz, about 5 months old. I'm willing to part with it for $1099 US.
    Dude, get over it. You tell me how much money you could get for a 5 month old dell laptop you bought for $1099. Probably $300, if anything. Apple Hardware resales amazingly well. You'd be shocked.

    I bought a PowerMac 800MHz G4 for around $1500, I used it for about 6 - 8 months and sold it for $1000 in 3 hours on ebay with Buyit now. Try to do that with PC hardware.. good luck!

  173. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There is no tech support for underwear. Every call from a customer cost you money. The cheaper the computer the stupider the questions.

  174. Re:Ditto. (nt) by RadRafe · · Score: 1

    How the heck did you do that?

  175. Re:Damn! Damn! Damn! (not quite true) by heliosnorf · · Score: 1

    Actually, this is not quite true. For example, MCE offers internal optical drive upgrades for PowerBooks and iBooks.

    Processor upgrades are harder to come by, but Other World Computing offers many different accelerator choices for Macs. I believe the most recent PowerBook you can accelerate is the G3 Pismo which originally came in 400MHz and 500MHz varieties. For $279, you can upgrade it to a 500MHz G4 chip - not too bad. If you happen to have a PowerBook (not an iBook), then you can also upgrade to things like USB 2 via the PCMCIA card slot. So, yes, they're not as upgradeable as desktops. But I'll bet they're more upgradeable than PC laptops - never seen an accelerator for one of those!

    --

    "A good traveller has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving." -Lao Tzu
  176. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by Aquafort · · Score: 1
    Well, this long-time Unix user hasn't really had a problem with that, but maybe my superior keyboard flexibility is from the days of having to use about sixty jillion different types of text terminals.

    Granted, the Ctrl key is located in a pretty sucky place on the Powerbook, but I've yet to see a laptop keyboard that didn't suck in some way or another. However, I think the real culprit here is the computer industry in general, which for no reason anyone can fathom insists on locating Caps Lock, the least used and most annoying key ever, in a very prominent position on the keyboard instead of where it belongs--in a distant city on another continent.

  177. My 17" PB 1.33 GHZ Powerbook is my favorite... by trublue · · Score: 2

    My favorite possession of all time. I love it more than words can describe and do everything with it. From development in XCode, to Dreamweaver, to manage my music, surf via export extreme at no performance hit, to create music and now (with Final Cut Pro) edit video...check email, play games, and the list goes on and on. It is sexy and it is a work of art, both functional and aesthetic. I have a hard time believing that I could love a car this much...

    --
    -Tru
    1. Re:My 17" PB 1.33 GHZ Powerbook is my favorite... by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      I couldn't agree more... mine's a 1GHz 17" PB, I upgraded the HDD to a 7200RPM to compensate for the hit of the slightly slower processor. It's just the best-designed piece of electronics I've ever had the pleasure of owning.

      On the car front, try driving a high-end (e class) Mercedes. Same feeling.

    2. Re:My 17" PB 1.33 GHZ Powerbook is my favorite... by trublue · · Score: 1
      I also upgraded the HDD to a 7200 RPM...the 7k60. God that operation scared me...as it voids the warranty and mine didn't immediately boot up upon reassembly (poorly connected wire that was hard to diagnose).

      I would love to drive an e class. Tell me, do you own one?

      --
      -Tru
    3. Re:My 17" PB 1.33 GHZ Powerbook is my favorite... by easter1916 · · Score: 1
      Good Lord no!!!! I should be so lucky. I used to live in Frankfurt and would rent them at the airport on weekends, go for long burns down the autobahn and across the border into France... what a car.

      That upgrade freaked me out too, but was nowhere near as scary as the same operation in an iBook. 7K60 installed here too. It seems a bit noisy compared to the original drive... same experience for you?

    4. Re:My 17" PB 1.33 GHZ Powerbook is my favorite... by trublue · · Score: 1
      I do notice the noise of the HD more, however, it is not significant. What gets me actually is that I use my book enough to have the fan on majority of the time. It runs HOT! I can even leave the room for 20-30 minutes and return and the fan is still on. I am not one to be bothered by this, but it is the most mechanical feature of the notebook and I don't like running SETI@home or Folding@home all night because I don't like to run the fan 24/7 if you know what I mean...

      The upgrade is good, but I don't like not having the top of the line powerbook. If things go well, though, money won't be much of a problem and I'll upgrade to the 2nd generation G5 powerbook. You and I should be able to last until then, no problem, so I say let the speeds get as high as they can!

      --
      -Tru
  178. 9700 Mobility? by VoraciousGorak · · Score: 1

    Rather surprised that nobody's pointed out that the 9700 Mobility is just a speed-bumped 9600 Mobility. It only has four pixel pipelines to work with and is still limited by the 128-bit memory bus. There's no eight-pipe 256-bit bus width card here, folks....

  179. Battery Life by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    I would not consider 3 hours good. It's like this: the reason you want a laptop is that it's mobile, right? So you can take it to work or classes, and you can travel with it. Now, with 2 to 3 hours of battery life, you can take it along, but not actually use it. With the 5 to 6 hours that current Apple notebooks give you, you can definitely use it while traveling, and you can survive a few classes. For a full working day, you'll need an outlet or a second battery, but it's obviously a lot better than most PC laptops.

    The battery lives mentioned above are advertised battery lives, but it is my experience that Apple machines really live up to 5 hours of normal use, and even survive watching a full DVD. My experience with PC laptops is limited to very few models, running Linux instead of the Windows that shipped with them, but I found that they come close to the advertised life only whe new and with very aggressive power management settings. Generally, I think you should assume somewhere around an hour and a half of actual use, and get new batteries every year, or even 6 months.

    Since I travel a lot and also like to use my computer wherever I go, Apple is almost the only choice for me. I know Dell has made laptops with 8 hour batteries, and there was an IBM Thinkpad with a truly impressive 11 hours of battery life, but those are exceptional and expensive. And they don't run OS X. :-)

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Battery Life by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reply. I disagree that current Apple laptops get that much battery life. As I said, my newish Rev B 12" PowerBook gets only 3. That is consistent with what I've read on Apple's discussion users. I think the iBooks may be better but I'm not sure how much better.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  180. Re:G4/G5 benchmarks by acidvoid · · Score: 1

    I just bought a Powerbook 17" a week-and-a-half ago and love it.
    Before buying I went to an Apple Store and tested the 1GHz 15" against my Thinkpad T40p and the Powerbook outperformed it. Except on UT2004. I just looked at the things I do daily, and I'm not interested in film editing or Photoshop filters.

    For more have a look at my switch

    Most of all, Apple's are just another nice computer, just like from Toshiba, IBM, Sony.... buy what you like and enjoy!

  181. Re: monopolies by Samiel · · Score: 1

    From dictionary.com:

    monopoly 1. Exclusive control by one group of the means of producing or selling a commodity or service

    Apple is a monopoly. It uses its exclusive control as the sole manufacturer of OSX compatible hardware to sell products at an inflated price. It uses the same power to design the hardware in such a way that customers must return to Apple for upgrades.

    For example, I want to upgrade my iBook to 802.11g, but I can't because of design decisions (flaws?) in the original Airport card specifications. It is a standard PC Card slot that has been crippled to ensure that only Apple's Airport card can be used.

    What can the purpose of that be other than to charge customers an inflated price, still almost $80, for aging technology? I don't believe this but, if Apple is NOT a monopoly then these limitations suggest that Apple engineers are incompetent.

  182. Re:Instead of a speed increase at the same price.. by dwightk · · Score: 1

    Why does Apple never drop the price of current hardware instead?

    they do

    --
    Like anyone can even know that
  183. Re:Lose Airport Extreme, add PCMCIA by valkraider · · Score: 1

    The 15 and 17 inch PowerBooks have the slots:

    One PC Card/CardBus slot supporting one Type I or Type II card (15-inch and 17-inch models)
    (near the bottom of the page, on the left, under "Expansion")

  184. Apple Lawsuit by piecewise · · Score: 1

    You are absolutely right. Companies should be forced to tell customers exactly what products they'll be coming out with for an indefinate time period. Full disclosure for everything that doesn't yet exist!

    I'm going to buy a new PowerBook tomorrow.. 12" with a SuperDrive... knowing full well that *possibly*... *maybe*.... there may one day be a better product out there replacing it.

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  185. Re:5200's? by guuyuk · · Score: 1

    Half-life2 for the Mac? Sure...2 years after the release on the PC (which will be...never to toolate?), then the port will be cancelled 2 days before release and never see the light of day again.

    --
    We're sorry, the phone number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try your call again
  186. I should clarify... by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should really clarify here. I'm not knocking Celeron machines and older Pentium/clones like yours for uses like that...I found a discarded Compaq Celeron-500-based machine in a "toaster" formfactor in my basement...and it is an awesome server!

    Right now I'm looking into getting an old, old laptop with AC adapter for use as a server because they're quiet and i can hide it in the bottom drawer of my dresser and have a mailserver without leaving on that wind-tunnel of a PC (my Athlon box) all night, etc.

    I think everything can be put to use, as you clearly appreciate too.

    1. Re:I should clarify... by name773 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right now I'm looking into getting an old, old laptop with AC adapter for use as a server
      you might be interested in mini itx. you've probly seen that before though... but it seems to fit what you're looking for

  187. Re:Ah... Now I want one even more... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    "Sure, or you could get an Athlon XP 3200 512K 2.2GHz 400 MHz FSB w/dvd-rw, 80gb 7200rpm drive, 512m, gigabit ethernet, bluetooth, 802.11g, a radeon 9200 and a 20" CRT for $100 less."

    Funny thing that you mentioned Bluetooth in that comparison. As a person who has used Bluetooth via my Sony Ericsson T616 with both an eMac (OS X 10.2 and 10.3) and a PC (WinXP), I can tell you which platform works best with Bluetooth.

    You also didn't factor in the cost of software in your PC equation. To match the eMac in standard software, you would have to include pirated copies of commercial software to match the functionality of the iApps.

    As for a 20" CRT, that maybe so, but I have to say that the CRTs in the eMac line are incredibly sharp. My 19" Trinitron I use with my PC is not as sharp as the eMac screen.

    And of course, you also aren't comparing the advange of having OS X as an operating system over WindowsXP. Sure, you could toss in the Linux factor for your PC example, but then you'd also take away a major advantage the (Windows) PC platform has over the Mac - games. You might as well drop the Radeon out of there if you go Linux because of driver issues; and the games factor again.

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  188. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by huchida · · Score: 2, Funny

    However, I think the real culprit here is the computer industry in general, which for no reason anyone can fathom insists on locating Caps Lock, the least used and most annoying key ever, in a very prominent position on the keyboard instead of where it belongs--in a distant city on another continent. ACTUALLY, I USE THE CAPS LOCK EVERY DAY WHEN I WRITE EMAILS AND POST MESSAGES. I FIND PEOPLE PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT YOU SAY WHEN IT READS LIKE YOU'RE SHOUTING.

  189. Re: monopolies by jbolden · · Score: 1

    Apple computers don't constitute their own commodity or service. They are a brand not an industry.

  190. Re:MAC Gamers, Rejoice! LOL by Darth+Fredd · · Score: 1

    Yes, Macs *do* have "modern" games available to them. But I keep my PC around because I play older games, more often. Looking around, I have:
    Wolfenstein: Enemy territory
    Grand Theft Auto (the first one,DOS)
    Quake 3 demo (which I've had problems with, on the mac)
    UT2k4 demo
    Meteor 1.2
    Desert strike(DOS)
    Deus Ex
    Cannon fodder 1 & 2

    In boxes around me, I have:
    Descent 1
    Myst
    Riven
    Half-life
    Fighter Duel(DOS)
    MOH:AA

    How many of those games are out for OSX? Some, to be sure. But the vast majority..not. My PC lets me play old, fun dos games. Macs don't. What could I do on a mac, that my PC doesn't let me do?

    Stability, you say? My (new,homebuilt) windows XP pro PC has "soft crashed" twice in the 3 months i've had it.

    When I want to experiment with 'nix, I fire up 'nix box, over to my right.

    And thats all.

    --
    "The most looniest, zaniest, spontaneous, sporadic Impulsive thinker, compulsive drinker, addict"
  191. News flash: Mac OS X is Unix. by JamieF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've taken a valid problem that only affects a very small number of users, and blown it way out of proportion.

    >Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.
    It's a fairly safe argument that current Apple laptops are the among the most usable laptops ever made. Many, many articles have been written and awards given praising their excellent usability and design. They were specifically designed to run Apple's own Unix which ships preinstalled.

    As far as I know there are no non-Unix operating systems that will run on directly on the hardware of current Apple laptops. (I'm lumping Linux in with Unix here.) I'm not 100% sure that somebody hasn't gotten AmigaOS or Be or something like that to run on current PB or iBook hardware, but even if they have, I doubt that there is even a single user in the whole wide world who uses anything like that as the primary OS on a current Apple laptop. It would be shocking indeed to find that they sold 157,000 PowerBooks and 217,000 iBooks last quarter if your claim that they were "effectively unusable" for all of their users were true.

    >Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part.
    No, it's a misunderstanding on your part, apparently reinforced by a single Apple employee who is either spreading incorrect information or whom you misunderstood. For Apple to ignore all Unix users would be to ignore all of their Mac OS X users.

    >Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 13 years.
    Well, they must have ignored their A/UX users (I believe A/UX was discontinued about 9 years ago, which was when the AWS 95 was discontinued), and their Apple Network Server users as well (the ANS line was discontinued just over 7 years ago, and ran AIX), if your figure of 13 years is to be believed. I do agree that Apple is probably not paying a lot of attention to A/UX and Apple Network Server users lately.

    In fact, all that your "more than 13 years" link shows is that there was somebody 13 years ago who wanted to remap his Mac's keyboard and didn't know how.

    You make a huge leap in assuming that the majority of Unix users want their Ctrl and Caps Lock keys in the same place that you do, and that Apple's failure to reimplement their keyboard hardware interface proves that they are ignoring Unix users as a whole. The fact is, uControl fills this need for Mac OS X users.

    If you have a genuine need to run OpenBSD or NetBSD on an Apple laptop, you could run it inside Bochs/WinTel or VirtualPC. I don't know of any good non-emulator virtualization layers for Mac OS X that are comparable to VMWare on x86; that is, ones that can run PPC on PPC without the overhead of emulation. (Panther has a Linux API compatibility layer, so it may be possible to compile User Mode Linux (which has been ported to PPC) so that you could run LinuxPPC on top of Mac OS X without emulation, but that doesn't get you OpenBSD or NetBSD.) However, since Mac OS X is Unix already, there isn't much need to run another PPC *nix on top of it, so I can understand why there don't seem to be any projects that provide this functionality. Likewise, I can see how Apple could be aware of the requirement that some users prefer that keyboard layout tweak, and could be satisfied with uControl + Mac OS X as the solution for that requirement. I'd like to hear what an Apple systems engineer or Apple Store "Genius" would have to say in response to your demand ("I want to run OpenBSD/NetBSD on one of your laptops instead of Mac OS X, so you have to re-engineer your keyboards to not use ADB anymore"). It would be pretty funny watching them try to be diplomatic in the face of such a request.

    >How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X prog