Slashdot Mirror


Massive Layoffs At AOL

JLavezzo writes "Several news sites are reporting that the United States' largest ISP has laid off 750 employees. My sources at AOL put the actual number at approximately 950 regular employees and 300 contractors from various departments including new technology and marketing. The contractors aren't mentioned by the news outlets. Severance packages are known to include up to four months pay and keeping laid off employees on the AOL payroll through February (to retain health insurance). With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?"

565 comments

  1. "Massive"? Kids these days. by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Funny
    What, a measly 950 people is what passes for a "massive" layoff nowadays?

    Bah, you kids. Back in my day (2000), we didn't feel right about going to lunch unless we'd shitcanned at least 1000 people by then. And two months on the payroll plus four months of severence? Bah! Back in my day you were lucky if you didn't have any personal possessions in the building when it was locked and the contents auctioned off on behalf of angry creditors.

    We *knew* how to make employees feel worthless. Layoffs via SMS! Contracted goons standing in the office in case they went postal! Taking away their razor scooters!

    Now get off my lawn, you damn kids.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Mwongozi · · Score: 5, Informative

      You think he's joking too. Layoffs by SMS have happened.

    2. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by pcmanjon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm friends with Tag Loomis (guy who programmed shoutcast) over at Winamp. He's a really nice guy.

      They had 3 programmers working on winamp, he never did work on winamp, only shoutcast.

      They also had a visualization skin programmer too.

      They were all fired, and he's the only one left, and sole programmer of Winamp now.

      I've brought several bugs to his attention, but he just can't keep up doing it all alone..

      He tells me that he expects nullsoft to be terminated soon because it's definately not making them any money. He says the only reason AOL bought them was so they could compete with Media player if they decided to push advertising for it. Kind of like netscape competing with IE.

      I asked him what he'd do if he's fired... he said he's probably start delivering pizza again, cause he's looked and looked for a job to transfer to and can't find one.

      He worked for Pheonix bios for several years, and if you have that bios your system is likly running code he's written.

    3. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Scorchio · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in my day you were lucky if you didn't have any personal possessions in the building when it was locked and the contents auctioned off on behalf of angry creditors.

      So you worked for Acclaim, I gather?

    4. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I felt that really was the case.
      The part about the goones at least I know to be true!
      -nB

      [that damn 2 min timeout should not apply across threads!!!]

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by vought · · Score: 1
      So you worked for Acclaim, I gather?

      Either that, or Metricom.

    6. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      A piece of trivia came up in my department meeting today. The company I work for has 60,000 software developers worldwide. That's just the software developers. So reading that 750 got laid off doesn't make me raise any eyebrows.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > A piece of trivia came up in my department meeting today. The company I work for has 60,000 software developers worldwide.

      IBM, eh? Microsoft doesn't even have that many employees.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    8. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by c0dedude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh god that's scary. A fairly famous programmer can't get work, and we're supposed to compete right out of college?

      --
      Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
    9. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When the poorly managed DirecTV Broadband closed it's doors I got a phone call the day after. I was originally called by a co-worker that day and told not to bother showing up cause the doors are locked and guarded by hired security. Beaverton OR call center, 1-3 Tier TS, Billing/Retention, Sales, Order Status and Order Management.) This is how I was told it went down...

      Around 10am everyone noticed none of the managers were around.

      At 11am everyone noticed none of floor supervisors were around.

      At noon everyone was told to go into the break room for an announcement, management from the corporate office in Cupertino showed up and told everyone to pack your belongings cause the ship is going down.

      At this time some of the women started crying and the men stood up on thier desks and started spouting streams of profanities.

      Oh yean this was 12 days before Christmas and at the time we didn't know if were going to get those promised performance bonuses due for Christmas. All 500+ of us were contract workers and some were on the job for more than 1yr. 6mo.

      A few days later the rest of us were allowed to gather our belongings while security at the door checked to make sure we didn't steal anything. So I guess it was good we at least got our junk and about a month later we got our $495 bonuses (and a free DirecTV desk clock!) after lots of bitching.

    10. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by _Qiang_ · · Score: 0

      he said he's probably start delivering pizza again, cause he's looked and looked for a job to transfer to and can't find one.

      I have to say that he gotta change his attitude.

      people who give up on looking for job shouldn't complain! the place i work for just hired a girl as sysadmin who immigrated from china earlier this year. ( Toronto,Canada )

      given that there are plenty of experienced sysadmins in toronto now and the fact that an immigrant got the job puzzles me.

      networking, polish your resume, and don't lose hope. there are people get job anytime in any situation.

    11. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Computers are just a fad anyway. You might as well major in Betamax.

    12. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by recharged95 · · Score: 1

      Back in my day (1999), layoffs were so immature & not news. We were worried about bankruptcy (CHAP 7 not 11) instead since the valley was already "heading south".

    13. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by nhorman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that kind of severance package seems to me to indicate the economy is strong, So I would guess the skilled employees will find work fast. 20,000 people at AOL though....What the hck does an ISP need with 20,000 people, even AOL's size? It makes me wonder just how skilled the newly unemployed were....

    14. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He tells me that he expects nullsoft to be terminated soon because it's definately not making them any money

      This was rumored for a while, right? Like these articles from 3 weeks ago.

      The Winamp guys have my sympathy, but they will find jobs if they try hard enough. If I can get a job (Laid off twice since 2000, I will be laid off next year, my coworkers are leaving for other jobs before they get laid off), the programmers of one of the most famous pieces of software will also find jobs.

    15. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by VultureMN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Re: Your sig

      Any website that's going to put pics of Moore and Nader next to Marx, Lenin, and Che Guevara instantly loses credibility. Disagree with Moore and Nader all you want, but comparing them to those other three is just fucking stupid.

    16. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by MP3Chuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you'll get a job because you're fresh ... thus easier to pay. A Famous Programmer will want twice what a college grad will get...

    17. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Tag Loomis"? What is it with you Americans and ridiculous names? Tag Loomis sounds like a carpet cleaning product.

    18. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK Einstein listen up and listen up good cuz I'm not gonna say this twice:
      Your little Chinese immigrant is probably going to work 100 hours a week, no breaks, no lunches, and earn half of what she could make because she lives with 15 of her relatives in a crummy two bedroom.
      Also, the fact that she wrote 'landed immigrant' on the first line of her CV entitles her employer to fabulous subsidies on her salary.
      OHHHHH CANADA!!!!

    19. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      From the article: "An unpleasant sign of how technology can be used today. Some HR person has as much courage as a Taiwanese mobo maker standing up to Intel."

      And right there in the page is a GIANT ad for motherboards, and the Intel processors that are put on them. The motherboards are made by Tyan, which has an office (among many other places) in Taiwan.

      Is that irony? I can never remember.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    20. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Good BIOS developers are in high demand. You just need to be willing to move to somewhere else in the U.S.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    21. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by penix1 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      "Also, the fact that she wrote 'landed immigrant' on the first line of her CV entitles her employer to fabulous subsidies on her salary."

      plus she meets 3 protected classes...

      Minority
      Female
      Young (Ok, not a "protected" class but still a plus since younger workers == less salery)

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    22. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by CmdrMooCow · · Score: 1

      I had a similar impression... since when does 750 count as Massive?

      About 508's posting, I almost left my chair.

    23. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Nope, not IBM. I wish I knew the source for this statistic, but it really doesn't surprise me. As for Microsoft, they really are a tiny company, and are in no way comparable to your standard multinational corporation.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    24. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by ewhac · · Score: 1
      Good BIOS developers are in high demand.

      Seconded. People with deep low-level experience remain in high demand, especially in the embedded space. I can't speak to the job market where he lives, but if this guy has done both low- and high-level development, there's a lot of good-paying work out there just waiting for him. And if he's really good and disciplined, he can probably find someone willing to let him work over the net, with only occasional visits to the office.

      Schwab

    25. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a Venture Bro's quote. Except Computers instead of Robots, no?

    26. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd. We've been looking for a talented web developer in Orange County for months and can't find anyone qualified...

      ASP, ASP.NET, PHP, MySQL, MS SQL = good job with a great company in a fantastic area.

    27. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by warfarin · · Score: 1

      Nulsoft is just marking time before the graveyard claims it. Their latest versions of winamp have been bad enough to make me cry. If AOL shuts down the nulsoft division, that will be a mitzvah

    28. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      ">Good BIOS developers are in high demand.
      >>Seconded. "

      Yes, I'm sure if he looks hard enough or is willing to do enough work he'll be able to get a job. He surely isn't as bad off as some of you guys above.

      Coding in assembly can be pretty damn tedious though, and definately isn't as convienent as programming in C/C++. Probably one of the reasons he doesn't want to go back to that.

      I don't blame him... but if he has to, he'll find another job with his background. Unless of course, like people said he's "overqualified"

    29. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      2,500 employess - Ouch, what a way to go. Here's something you won't hear on Good Morning America, "US firms announce 104,530 job cuts in November".

      = 9J =

    30. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> Tag Loomis sounds like a carpet cleaning product.

      I think after they shitcan his sorry ass, he'll be happy for that kind of work.

    31. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Actually... my skillset exactly matches what you're looking for. Want to bring me over from the UK? :)

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    32. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just trying to inject some new life into the endless recitation of cartoon quotations that takes place here.

    33. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by modernbob · · Score: 1

      You have to ask yourself a few things when you read this. after most everyone loses their manufacturing and IT jobs what will we all do for work. We all can't work for hot dog on a stick! Can we? I mean if thats what I have to look forward to then it's time to leave the country or something.

    34. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's because you're looking:

      A. For someone who knows both an open source technology and a technology that most open source advocates would rather gouge their eyes out than look at,
      B. For someone with a computer background in Orange County,
      C. For someone with a computer background in Orange County,
      D. All of the above.

      Don't list MS SQL. SQL is SQL, for the most part, administration notwithstanding, and it isn't hard to learn administration, generally. Heck, don't list ASP, either. Advertise a position for PHP/MySQL. Then tell them the bad news at the interview.... Break it to them gently that they'll be expected to learn Microsoft's buggy, security-hole-ridden equivalents as well.

      The point is that somebody with PHP/MySQL experience should be able to pick up ASP/MS SQL pretty easily, but they won't ever get past your HR department's radar because they'll be looking for a web designer with ASP and MS SQL experience when what you really want is a programmer with some experience at web design and database management.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    35. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      To my understanding, he doesn't technically work for Nullsoft anymore. He's part of Aol Multimedia or something to that effect. He's working on the Ultravox Multimedia Router. I know most of the Nullsoft team, including Justin Frankel (Nullsoft founder) and Tag, and it's my understanding that Tag wasn't really that actively involved in Winamp development outside of the DSP plug-ins for shoutcast. So I can't imagine he'd be doing much code maintenance anyway.

      Shoutcast was originally developed by Justin and Tom Pepper while Tag was still at Phoenix BIOS. Tag sorta acted as a offhours consultant along with several other developers and testers on #nullsoft. After the AOL merger, Nullsoft brought Tag on-board fulltime to further the shoutcast development.

      But AOL pushed shoutcast to be forked away from Winamp so that they could roll shoutcast technology into an enterprise product. They soon realized that Winamp would not make them any money, but saw potential in shoutcast. So that's where Tag went.

      P.S. It's probably not a good idea to go posting about how someone is looking for another job on a forum like slashdot. Especially when their wife just had a baby. Especially when (as you said) they haven't been able to find a new job yet.

    36. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      I was going to say IBM ... perhaps Intel ? Maybe some sort of consulting firm. The only "computer" companies that even have that many employees are Intel, IBM and perhaps Oracle.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    37. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Oh goody, I will be cheap... yuppee :)

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    38. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      What??? Fresh grads will get jobs???? where do I have to move??? I've been looking for a programming job since March 2k3.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    39. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by iocat · · Score: 1

      Hot Dog on a Stick doesn't even hire guys, so 99.999% of /. readers are SOL. However, with HDOAS, you kind of want the ladies working there exclusively, especially when they make the lemonade...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    40. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by zapp · · Score: 1

      Clearly his lifestyle is such that he requires a lot of money, and that's why he said his next job will be a Pizza Delivery boy, because Dominos pays *so much*.

      --
      no comment
    41. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by sazy · · Score: 1



      Oh my heavens! How can that be so? Those honorable men and women who represent us in congress say the economy is just fine, so fine in fact, they decided not to renew the fed's portion of unemployment benefits. You must have heard your friend incorrectly, I'm sure.-sticking tongue firmly in cheek-

    42. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trickle down economics to the rescue. We will all get jobs as pool boys and maids for the rich who are getting richer at our expense. [/sarcasm]

    43. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Who says it's a "computer" company? Here's a hint: we have 430,000 employees total.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    44. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered hiring Mercatur? She's single, too!

    45. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by icedcool · · Score: 1

      hmmm.... why does this sound like something out of a prison scene.

      " because you're fresh ... thus easier to pay"

      you mean thus easier to RAPE.

      anyway...

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    46. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd leave your home country for a stupid job developing web applications? You must be one desperate guy.

    47. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you're not trolling, which I believe you are, you should post a link or contact information so people can actually apply if any slashdot readers fit. How exactly do you expect anyone to send you a resume based on that vague anonymous coward post?

      Sounds more like your company is rejecting qualified candidates for ridiculous reasons so you can claim you have to hire H1B's.

      Do you rule out everybody that doesn't happen to live right next to you already, and reject someone with years of ASP, ASP.NET, PHP, and MySQL experience because their resume doesn't say MS SQL?

      When a company says they can't find anyone qualified, it's usually either a lie or a bottom 20% company refusing to hire anything but a top 20% employee. Be realistic. The human resources practices that dominate American business are quite inefficient. It's usually better to train imperfect people than to wait for the guy that exactly matches your huge list of requirements.

    48. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      What, a measly 950 people is what passes for a "massive" layoff nowadays?

      No kidding. Where was the sensational headline when EarthLink laid off ~3,000?

    49. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by amw · · Score: 2, Informative

      A quick google says 'Siemens', to save anyone else the effort.

    50. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      * sigh * - It was a joke, hence the smiley.

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    51. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The problem here sounds like HR wrote the specs.
      Back in 95 I saw a job listing that essentially required you to be one the people who wrote the first 6-10 rfc's, and had some other requirements that probably eliminated half of them. I don't recall wich company it was, but they were fairly big as I recognized them and wondered why they didn't bother to just send a formal letter to the three or four people who qualified. Then I saw the salary they were offering was less than $40k year.
      I've also seen job listing for people with 20+ years devloping C++ aplications for windows (back in the 90's as well), listings for web designers with 10 years experience (less than 5 years AFTER mosiac), and other such impossible job requirements.
      If you don't know enough about a field to know what's possible, let alone normal or reasonable, you should do at least SOME research before writing a job listing.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    52. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by nick+korma · · Score: 1

      This has reminded me of something which cropped up in my firm a couple of weeks ago - we have a system where internal positions which need filling are mailed out to consultants who are looking for other projects etc - one of my team applied for what is essentially his own job but in another part of the country (he thought it was for design and implementation instead of support) he got a reply back from HR saying that he was not suitable (for his own job!) - which given he is the most experianced / qualified / capable person I have worked with was laughable. We use a HR dept to vet cv's and given some of the idiots who have gotten to interview - I dread to think of the talent which has been passed over because HR dont understand the qualifications on their cv...

    53. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by eneville · · Score: 1

      In the UK you're lucky if you dont get dumped via SMS!

    54. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by eneville · · Score: 1

      Better than being a deep sea fisherman though! You should look for a job as a R+D person.

    55. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by ThoreauHD · · Score: 1

      You know what makes your statement so funny.. is that it was true. That's sad. Sadder still that you make me feel old... :/

    56. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Golias · · Score: 1

      You have to ask yourself a few things when you read this. after most everyone loses their manufacturing and IT jobs what will we all do for work. We all can't work for hot dog on a stick! Can we? I mean if thats what I have to look forward to then it's time to leave the country

      You are absolutely right. Even though unemployment remains below five and a half percent, the whole nation is clearly going to Hell in a bucket. It is indeed time for you to leave. Take Alec Baldwin with you. He's been saying he's going to leave for a while now, so clearly he's just been waiting for a carpooling buddy.

      Good luck in your new country. We will all really, really miss you back here in the states while we live in squalor and work at hot dog stands with no hope of ever having a better life. Really. We're sad to see you go, but understand that it's in your best interest.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    57. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit slacking then. :-) I got out Dec '03 and I've been gainfully employed since two weeks after graduation.

      Look outside of programming - consulting is a great field if you have any sort of people skills at all. And you get to travel. And you eat well. And it can't be outsourced. I had previous experience, but not as a consultant - just as a student code monkey.

      FYI, I live in the DC area. Moved there for the job.

    58. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1
      Didn't the great Neal Stephenson in his novel "Snow Crash" predict that American job market will devolve into the 3 things it does best?:
      • microcode
      • entertainment
      • high-speed pizza delivery
      Let's face it, punching code is one thing ... but being the Deliverator is quite another. VRROOOOMMMMM!
      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    59. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Tell him to try applying over at OSDL...

      http://www.osdl.org/about_osdl/jobs/

      --Or maybe Transmeta... Or SuSE... Or even Red Hat...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    60. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Crap, that's nothing. Layoffs at Nortel, during the crash days, happened *10,000* at a time, and that happened more than once (consider an almost 50% contraction, from over 100,000 employees to around 60,000).

    61. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --He should consider bringing this fiasco to Mgmt's attention; it carries some risk but could be worthwhile.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    62. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree that every time I see MS technologies listed on a job description I tend to skip over it. I'd have to be pretty desperate before I'd send in a resume for a job working with stuff I just don't enjoy at all.

    63. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by nick+korma · · Score: 1

      yeah - it may be worth it to me.. but if the engineer were to start letting people higher up he chain know - he could end up posting comments on /. about how he is struggling to find work :o(

    64. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Oh god that's scary. A fairly famous programmer can't get work, and we're supposed to compete right out of college?

      In case it hasn't been said over and over and over again, the job market for a coder in the US is saturated. In case it hasn't become apparent, the career path of a coder is not that different from a court stenographer - people tell you what to write and you write it.

      If you want to be successful (employed for the next 40 years at a rate that justifies the cost of your education), you must have something beyond writing code. Writing code is a cheap skill that can be exported. Designing software, writing scientific software, writing software for a DoD contractor, doing research in user interfaces or system architecture, etc. are skills that will remain in the US and justify the cost of the education.

      Being a professional PHP or Java or C++ coder on the open job market is NOT something I would recommend as a career choice. The people who are successful at this already have experience doing it. If you're fresh out of college, you don't have the experience plus your work ethic and maturity level are a question.

      Case in point - I don't know anybody that I went to school with who is writing code commerically. I know a ton of people who work for DoD subcontractors, a few people who work in IT (sysadmins, networking infrastructure, etc.), a few people who work in research, and a good number of people who left computer programming (such as myself, who works in IP law.)

      So if this is news to you, you might have bigger problems than your future career. I suggest becoming intimately familiar with issues such as the domestic economy, the foreign economic policies of your government, the standards of labor in other countries, and if you're dead set on being a professional programmer, I recommend figuring out what it takes to get a work visa in Australia, India, and a variety of eastern European nations.

    65. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I remember a guy, with a bullhorn, walking down the central corridor in one big bldg of Columbia Records' west coast HQ, one afternoon, and announcing, "everybody on the south side of the office, please clear out yer desks, now." Okay, it was only 700 guys, but it was the eighties. Not as polite as what AOL is doing, either.

      I'm no fan of AOL, but the newbs had to have somewhere to go. And AOL did let Netscape/Mozilla go off to do its thing,unlike the sort of thing that MS, Apple, Adobe, and many others have done as a matter of 'biz as usual'...

      As for job prospects? Hey, they're mostly Republicans, right? So, what's the prob? Their guys are in charge, fossil fuels are still 'cool', and there's shitloads of coal mines down there round the PA, VA, border areas... heheh, have fun guys! :=)

    66. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by frsmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah I miss them days!!! We used to pay for the right to work here!! Bob

      --
      It Seems I've developed an aversion to proprietary software
    67. Re:"Massive"? Kids these days. by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm gainfully employed, but it's at WorstBuy as a technician. (At least one store has someone who know's what their talking about)

      And always remember "beware of computer programmers that cary screwdrivers."

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
  2. back to their previous jobs of course by ylikone · · Score: 2, Informative

    waiting tables, burger flipping, etc....

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by scooby111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know that you're trying to be funny, but you may be more right than you know. Why do we automatically assume that most of the people being let go are actually technology workers? The vast majority of those people being laid off are probably regular Joe, non high-tech workers. Some of which are will probably be fine pushing paper elsewhere.

      It's always a sad thing when someone gets laid off, but it's been a long time coming at AOL. They've been hemorraging money and, IMHO, being irresponsible with their money by not cutting costs and downsizing.

    2. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being irresponsible with their money by not cutting costs and downsizing.

      Oh, I see. So employing people is irresponsible now.

    3. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, losing money by refusing to cut back wasteful areas is. Do you think it's somehow responsible to employ 2 people to do the job of one? How many people will lose their jobs when the whole company folds?

    4. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it could'nt happen to a better state.........
      assholes in virginia treat us truck drivers like crap..........so I applaud AOL........

    5. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      This also means, of course, that if you want to cancel your AOL "trial" that you're going to have to wait about a week on hold to speak to someone in Bangalore who doesn't know the meaning of the word "cancel."

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    6. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yep. . .the article said mostly "new technology" and "marketing". . . my buds at AOL said it's MOSTLY marketeers, they're just also shutting down some of the R&D shops. . .

    7. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, all the call centers that handle member retention are US based (Jax, Utah, etc)

    8. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by penix1 · · Score: 1

      "my buds at AOL said it's MOSTLY marketeers, they're just also shutting down some of the R&D shops"

      They need to cut out the marketing more than the marketeers. I'm sure all those coasters they send out cost $$$ that can be better spent elsewhere.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    9. Re:back to their previous jobs of course by bkocik · · Score: 1
      They've been . . . being irresponsible with their money by not cutting costs and downsizing.

      Have they?

      A Brief History of AOL

  3. Obligatory Slogan Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You've Got Severance!"

    1. Re:Obligatory Slogan Reference by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Goodbye

    2. Re:Obligatory Slogan Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO

  4. Chances for Jobs by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

    Northern Virginia is probably a pretty good place, since we're right next to DC and a lot of the juicy government contracting jobs.

    IMarv

    1. Re:Chances for Jobs by urmensch · · Score: 1

      Have fun commuting!

    2. Re:Chances for Jobs by IMarvinTPA · · Score: 1

      Heavy Rail is pretty good, and so is the light rail and busses.

      IMarv

    3. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who has one of those juicy government contracting jobs, I can tell you that they're a hell of a lot easier to get once you have one of those juicy government security clearances.

    4. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to take the Metro to anywhere near McLean that wasn't the Tyson's Corner mall? It is not fun or easy.

    5. Re:Chances for Jobs by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      As someone that doesnt have one of those juicy government security clearances... how does one go about getting them?

    6. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess that I got lucky. My current employer was willing to hire me for a position that required a DoD clearance even though I didn't have one yet. I was young and willing to work for less money than I was worth because of the missing clearance. It took about 7 months for me to get my clearance, and in the past two years my salary has caught up to what I feel I'm worth to the company.

    7. Re:Chances for Jobs by jproffer · · Score: 1

      Here's how.. http://www3.ccps.virginia.edu/career_prospects/Tre nds/securityclearance.html

    8. Re:Chances for Jobs by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny
      As someone who has one of those juicy government contracting jobs, I can tell you that they're a hell of a lot easier to get once you have one of those juicy government security clearances.
      --
      I want a free iPod Photo [freephotoipods.com]
      Let's see...you have a juicy government contracting job...and are spamming one of those pyramid-free-iPod schemes...

      Intriguing.
    9. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why isn't someone with a job allowed to want a free iPod?

    10. Re:Chances for Jobs by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      thanks for the heads up.. had heard that the only way to get it was through getting a job where it was required...catch-22 stuff :).

    11. Re:Chances for Jobs by dew4au · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's called an EPSQ. It can take as long a a year for your final clearance to come through. I think you might need a sponsor with a reason to access classifid data to actually get a clearance. Classified information is on a need to know basis.

    12. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 1
      Read the link:


      First, you've got to apply for a federal job (or a job with a federal contractor) that requires that you have a security clearance. You can't decide on your own that you want one!


      You do have to get a job where it's required. You can be granted an interim clearance while your application is processing, which is a process I've seen take up to 18 months for some coworkers.

      Like I said earlier, I got lucky and found an employer that was willing to sponser my clearance application. There are lots of employers in the NoVA area that will do that (SAIC, Booz, and Lockheed just to name a few), but you have a major advantage if you already have the desired clearance or some clearance from the agency that the job requires.
    13. Re:Chances for Jobs by robogop · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Change your /. handle!
      Step 2: Follow someone else's instructions on getting a clearance
      Step 3: Profit? (Or at least Get By)

      --

      I'm a great believer in luck. The harder I work the more I have of it. - Thomas Jefferson
    14. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      you have a juicy government contracting job


      Yep. I work at SAIC on a project called MEDAL. Here are some pictures of a recent business trip I took aboard the USS Nimitz during a TECHEVAL of the software.


      and are spamming one of those pyramid-free-iPod schemes

      Yep. They actually work.
    15. Re:Chances for Jobs by wobblie · · Score: 1

      Uh, what kind of clearance?

      Very rarely is anything greater than "secret" required (unless you're working on missile gyroscopes or something like that), and a secret clearance is just about worthless, it doesn't mean hardly a thing and they are very easy to get - no background check, nothing. Top secret is another matter, usually given to mormons.

    16. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they give top secret clearance to morons? Is it because they will forget everything immediately?

    17. Re:Chances for Jobs by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Anybody else read "DOD" as "Department of Death"? Too much Grim Fandango, I guess..

    18. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was *this* close to landing an awesome job over near Sandia with a contractor willing to set me up with a clearance, but lost it when someone else with one waltzed in.

      Its easy to say "find a company that will sponsor you" but in this job market, theres enough people with clearance as without looking for jobs that you're unlikely to get one, since you've pretty much lost the job if someone with a clearance submits their application.

    19. Re:Chances for Jobs by urmensch · · Score: 1

      I would mod you up as informative if I could. Realistically, unless you're coming from somewhere near the metro (within 10 minutes), it's not going to be an easy commute. Maybe it wouldn't be to bad if you worked at the Pentagon. But if live out near Reston or something, and have to commute into the city, you have my sympathy.

      Not impossible, just not ideal.

    20. Re:Chances for Jobs by vidstudent · · Score: 1

      Assuming you had one through, say, a good six years in the Marine Corps Reserve, along with an associate's degree in computer programming, what jobs might be available?

      --

      Nicholas Eckert
      vidstudent

    21. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      People with real world experience by having served in the military hold most of the systems engineering jobs on the project that I work on. We only have one programmer that I know of who has served, but domain knowledge is definately a plus when applying for these types of jobs.

    22. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons, you fool. Presumably because they usually don't drink and womanize, etc.

    23. Re:Chances for Jobs by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      well, at least the real estate market in the dc area makes CA look SANE.

      seriously, i have a relative: lawyer, partner, big law firm, dc aree, 750,000 house that is a SHITHOLE compared to anything out here in "the real world"...

      its amazing what people are paying for these little cramped things, just to commute to dc in less than 2 hours is insane.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    24. Re:Chances for Jobs by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      Wasn't true for me. I was laid off from my systems administrator job at General Dynamics in 2001. I had an active SSBI/top-secret security clearance.

      The first thing I did was apply at Raytheon, Boeing, Lockheed, Ball Areospace, etc. I got absolutely no interest.

      I dunno, maybe it's just me.

    25. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As someone who has one of those juicy government contracting jobs, I can tell you that they're a hell of a lot easier to get once you have one of those juicy government security clearances.

      As one of those guys with a government contracting job, it's really cool watching worthless civil servants with jobs for life sit on their ass all day reading the paper and browsing the web while your coworkers and friends on other contracts are being laid off because money is tight. Civil servant == job for life around here. It's fucking stupid.

    26. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your kidding right,

      If your in NOVA you should have no trouble getting a job with an active TS\SSBI. I have literaly had dozens of jobs offered to me by folks from other companies, I was not even searching for a new job. Basically I stuck with one company that got bought by several larger companies until finally I decided to take a really good offer from a large vendor while still maintaining my security clearance. I am confident that if I got laid of tomorrow I would have a job within two weeks for at least my current salary if not an increase...

    27. Re:Chances for Jobs by mrbcs · · Score: 1
      Why don't government workers look outside their windows in the morning?

      They'd have nothing to do in the afternoon!

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    28. Re:Chances for Jobs by Lord+Apolon · · Score: 1

      By not being a Pinko Commie, for one. Better hope they don't see your username...

    29. Re:Chances for Jobs by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Ah, that would be why they take somewhere around 2 years to get(based on my last experience)..... The two Secret level investigations that I have received have interviewed coworkers, neighbors, etc (for fun, if you ever get one, remember to file a FOIA action to get a copy, its pretty interesting, as well as being a good baseline for future re-ups/upgrades). At even the minimum they run Credit, NAC (National Agency Check) and LAC (Local Agency Check). The average right now is 12 months, and around 24 for TS+. It does tend to be higher for contractors than government employee's.
      And given that a lot of newer work is in the Terrorism/Intel field, that often requires the issuance of TS to work in that arena.

    30. Re:Chances for Jobs by slashdot.org · · Score: 1

      Yep. They actually work.

      Isn't that the most common response from someone who just got tricked into a pyramid scheme?

      (no offense, my sig has been like this for a while now; if you don't understand it, define the word 'free' to us)

    31. Re:Chances for Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Worked for SAIC for several years. Good outfit, just based on the people I worked for there. Largest employee-owned company, with the most govt. contracts, at least according to their literature. Hired me out of school w/o a clearance or any real experience and got me one while I worked on less-security-related stuff. Learned a lot of Unix there doing unix support contracts. This was 1992. You know, the previous time the job market sucked. :)

    32. Re:Chances for Jobs by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

      I admit that it's a pyramid scheme, but I don't feel like I was tricked into joining. I signed up on my own after researching it for a while.

      As for the free part, I haven't spent any $$$ for the referrals that I've gotten. I set up Conga Circles to get all of my referrals (and many have come from my signature as well), so I haven't spent time recruiting new people; I let the Conga Circles do that for me. I did have to do some work in PHP to get the Conga Circles working, but I think that was the best part. Oh, and I got to use BLockbuster's online rental system for free for two months and got 4 free in store rentals (without which I probably never would have tried Pikmin 2, which was awesome).

      So, while that may be a common response from someone who just got tricked into a pyramid scheme, it's also a response from someone who made the pyramid scheme work for him.

    33. Re:Chances for Jobs by TechieSidhe · · Score: 1

      Who do you file the FOIA request to? Unfortunately, my clearance has expired, but am really curious to see what they have.

      --
      "Eat drywall, demon!" Alice - Dilbert
    34. Re:Chances for Jobs by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      assuming your clearance is with the DOD (and given the breakdown on who has the most cleared people most people have one with them) then simply go to this site and they will explain what to do.

      here
      and here, a sublink
      Heh, love the line right above the second link... We do not investigate unexplained phenomena

    35. Re:Chances for Jobs by jebell · · Score: 1

      Being a small-time lawyer and having just purchased a tiny house in the DC area, you are dead on.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    36. Re:Chances for Jobs by syrinx · · Score: 1

      You can't metro to the mall, or anywhere at all in Tysons or McLean.

      Anyway, I work in McLean, and live in Falls Church.. it's like a 10 minute drive.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  5. 750 is massive? by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Come on... my employer cuts thousands...

    Besides, hasn't anybody of worth left already?

    1. Re:750 is massive? by graveyardduckx · · Score: 0

      This coming from someone who calls himself PornMaster. ;-) I thought the porn industry was booming.

    2. Re:750 is massive? by sH4RD · · Score: 1

      Yes, like Justin Frankel.

      --
      WASTE - The Secure P2P
    3. Re:750 is massive? by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have a day job at a major multinational tech company.

    4. Re:750 is massive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A.K.A: Vivid Video

  6. Can't say I'm too surprised. by chroot_james · · Score: 0

    I don't really understand what AOL is doing for a business anymore. Even my Mom understands the Internet enough to not need AOL to hold her hand the whole way through. Can someone explain what they do that is unique?

    --
    Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.
    1. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Beats the hell out of me. Their main push now seems to be packaging AOL along with broadband for a ridiculous fee on top of what you pay to your ISP. They are signing up very few new dialup subscribers, as most people these days know enough to not pay $25/month when they could be paying less than half of that for a superior service.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    2. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Sending out millions of junk-mail CD packs?

    3. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      And the people I know who are signing up are signing up so they can get free Internet service from them. Have you ever tried calling AOL to cancel your account? They'll offer you a month "free" if you stay with them. And then when you call a month later to cancel, they offer you another free month. How does AOL expect to survive with that kind of business model?

    4. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      By not cancelling your account when you request it. ;-) Have you ever heard stories of people trying to deal with their "customer service" people, who are paid based on how many customers they retain?

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    5. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by spuzzzzzzz · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, we tried one of those AOL free month disks (I was young, OK? I didn't know better). After about 30 minutes of waiting for something to actually show up on the bloody screen (14.4 kbps modem), my mum wrote AOL an annoyed letter telling them that using their service was about as interesting as observing defecating earthworms. They cancelled our account fairly promptly (they also sent us an ad assuring us that AOL 4.0 had just been released and was an amazing new faster service, but by that time, we had learned our lesson).

      --

      Don't you hate meta-sigs?
    6. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by malfunct · · Score: 1

      The people that realy like AOL want to stay inside the walled garden. Selling the content and software without tieing the people into a particular ISP is probably a good strategy especially since providing broadband seems to be out of reach for anyone other than telcom corps.

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    7. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by aacool · · Score: 1

      I am a very satisfied subscriber of AOL Broadband - I see it as a convenient means of accessing new videos, ent, love the games and AOL Radio. Oh, the fact that I get an AOL proxy address everytime I start the AOL browser is nice too;) I'm not a noob, just like the service and can afford it.

    8. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      You can get loads of good, free radio at shoutcast.com or icecast. The games, come on. Aren't those just mostly annoying little flash games and the like? Also, are the videos you mention mostly just news. Because those you can easily get anywhere. To each his own, but I really can't see spending that much money for just content that is easily accessible gratis elsewhere.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    9. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      I'd actually be more worried about accessing certain servers or addresses due to the tendency of admins to ban *!*@aol.com out of desperation.

    10. Re:Can't say I'm too surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You can get loads of good, free radio at shoutcast.com

      I like shoutcast, but I find it often unreliable and inconsistent. You get what you pay for and if you want quality radio then you need to pay for it.

  7. contractor positions available by jwsd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Iraqi government is hiring US contractors to help them count ballots.

  8. boo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    if they'd only spent less on all those darn cds...

    1. Re:boo by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      They don't spend anything on CDs. They just wait until they've gotten enough of 'em in the mail and then send them out again. Or they stop by Wal-mart and pick up a handful.

  9. Ship 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ship 'em to India, mate!

    ARGHHH!

  10. 750? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 2, Insightful


    It shouldn't take 750 people to run the entire company, let alone having 750 extra people hanging around that they really don't need.

    AOL management is as stupid as their users.

    1. Re:750? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? What happend to the + mod points? This comment is golden.

    2. Re:750? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, just maybe, that's why they're letting them go to begin with? Sheesh.

    3. Re:750? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      They've grown in bits and pieces over the years, so their network is a pretty random hodgepodge of servers, routers, and switches from many companies running several OSes (I know someone who worked there for a while -- interesting learning environment), and they do still have a userbase of somewhere around 30 million in a several locations. They need plenty of people. Even with 20,000 people, that's 1500 members for each person. It sounds on the surface like a respectable ratio.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:750? by aengblom · · Score: 1

      Moreover, these cuts include employees from its other properties too. Winamp, Netscape, Mapquest, City Guide, AIM, ICQ, Love.com, Moviephone.

      The list goes on.

      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    5. Re:750? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking out of your ass. This is insightful on what planet?

    6. Re:750? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this post is baseless.. moderators look at the poster's history - he is a troll.

    7. Re:750? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Moviephone
      Nooooo... not the Moviephone guy! If he goes, I'll have nothing left but the three Movietickets "silent 'r'" idiots.
  11. FC link by StalinJoe · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." - Josef Stalin
    1. Re:FC link by oasisbob · · Score: 3, Funny
      [fuckedcompany.com]
      Anyone else find it ironic that the [url.com] link disclaimer which is meant to keep things work safe actually made this post less safe for work?

      The poster was very kind to refer to it as FC...

  12. New AOL Message by CrackedButter · · Score: 4, Funny

    You got ... DOLE!

    1. Re:New AOL Message by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Bob Dole says, I don't get it.

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    2. Re:New AOL Message by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      From Family Guy:

      Bob Dole likes your style. Bob Dole! BOB DOLE!... Bob dole.. Bob......... Dole..

    3. Re:New AOL Message by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      In the UK at least, "Dole" money is a benefit the government gives people who have lost their jobs if it wasn't their fault.

  13. Merry F'ing Christmas by Rosyna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a lovely gift. No?

    1. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd rather get fired Dec 1 with 2 months pay than on Feb 1 with nothing.

    2. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky bastards! They get to go Christmas shopping during weekdays, when the malls aren't so busy.

    3. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better to get canned before you charge up your credit cards for the holidays.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    4. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by Teknikill · · Score: 1

      I DID get layed off Dec 1 last year. F*ked up my life too, cause I wasn't prepared for it.

      Brought to you from the asses at smoothcorp

    5. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with employers? I've been, ahem, shitcanned twice just before xmas. Both times I already had approved leave only days away. At least two of my close friends have had similar experiences, one on contract coming back from leave just before xmas being told that he'd been replaced. 'Tis the season to be an arsehole?

    6. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea is to let you go before an extended period of time off (weekend, holidays) so that you can't come back to the office in a huff and had time to reflect.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    7. Re:Merry F'ing Christmas by corngrower · · Score: 1

      I was laid off a week and a half before Christmas once. It wasn't a surprise, though, and I'ld been prepared for it. Don't know if that was the case for some of the other people who were also laid off at the time. I was of the opinion that the slow performance of the software we'ld been working on was a major flaw. The sw architect and managment didn't seem to think so. I was right. When the sw was beta'd to several potential customers the first part of December, they all gave it a big thumbs down. The revenue stream the company was counting on didn't materialize, hence the layoffs.

  14. Job Prospects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing how tough it can be to cancel an AOL subscription, I'll bet that those laid-off AOL phone support folks could work in a gym's membership office.

    Of course, that'll be the ONLY time most of them would get CLOSE to a gym.

  15. Hopes for finding new jobs.... by Vladan · · Score: 1

    What are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    How do they feel about warmer climates? Relocation? And how up to date is their knowledge of Indian dialects?

  16. If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Helevius · · Score: 3, Informative
    The job market in northern VA is strong. Check out these unemployment rates:

    US (nation) for Oct 04: 5.1%
    VA (state) for Oct 04: 3.2%

    If these poor souls have skills, they will find jobs here. I doubt most of them have security clearances, but those that do will be immediately re-employed.

    Helevius

    1. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Trailwalker · · Score: 1

      Northern Virginia is a D.C. suburb. They should have little trouble finding new jobs. Big Brother always needs helpers.

    2. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Trogre · · Score: 1

      VA? What, Vancouver is a state now?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Northern Virginia is an excellent place to be looking for a tech job. I used to live there but decided I'd try my hand at getting a job down here in Northwest Arkansas. I'm now contracting with a company back in Northern Virginia, but at least I get to stay here in Arkansas :-)

      And you can keep the Arkansas jokes to yourself. Whatever people may say about the state, NW Arkansas is actually very nice and where I live, pretty liberal.

    4. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but Virginia is, you dumb shit.

    5. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      How liberal could it be? It voted for bush.

      In fact, I see a lot more red there than the rest of the state.

      Arkansas Election Map by County

      Maybe you meant East Arkansas?

    6. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by jaxdahl · · Score: 1

      Actually, wouldn't that make it harder to find a job there?

    7. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by jfarnold · · Score: 1

      Really a security clearance is key.

    8. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      If we are all thinking "EXCELLENT! So long, AOL", dream on. It is but a blip. There will ALWAYS be nubes.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    9. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS on this one..I just went through a 2-week hiring process to hire an A+ type hardware guy to work with me in Falls Church..we had freaking PhD's applying for a $35,000 a year hardware repair position who had written white papers. 230 resumes for this job, with about half being programmers. There's no tech work in northern VA. Would have been fun to have a PhD working for my MCSE self though :)

    10. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they kept their jobs long enough to refinance their mortgage - otherwise they'll be homeless pretty quickly - this is an expensive place to live. Unemployment will barely cover a typical mortgage or rent. I'm also not sure if they can get a loan secured on their house right now if they are already "laid-off".

    11. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by cowsandmilk · · Score: 1

      Just to emphasize, Loudon where AOL is has 1.7% and Fairfax which is next door has 1.8% There was an article in the Washington Post about companies not being able to find construction workers cause everyone already had jobs in Loudon County. Work is not hard to find.

      --
      http://sladm.org Saint Louis Area Dance Marathon The Best One Night Stand of Your Life
    12. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      It has been said (not sure where): "There are
      lies, damn lies, and statistics".

      The statistics that you quote are a bit mis-
      leading, since once off the unemployment rolls
      you aren't counted anymore. And if you were
      in IT, and your new job is a part-time McJob
      you aren't counted anymore.

      I don't mean to be snide or sarcastic, but
      the ex-AOL staffers might not be able to get
      a construction job in NoVA. At least not
      without being fluent in Spanish -- even the
      construction foremen and site managers are
      Hispanic these days. IMHO, the complaints
      from construction companies is a smokescreen
      for "the man" for when INS agents start
      checking documentation. It is still "illegal"
      for companies to hire illegal aliens, although
      it isn't actually enforced (apparently anywhere).

    13. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under threat of layoff awhile back (I managed to find another job inside the company just an hour before my layoff notice was to hit). However, i started putting together the survival plan weeks before then.

      I refinanced my 30yr/fixed for another 30yr/fixed at a lower rate to minimize monthly cash outflow and setup a home equity line of credit (NOT a home equity loan) at the same time. I put the cute little checkbook that they sent me in an envelope marked "FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY", and put that envelope in a my safe deposit box.

      The $50/yr that i have to spend to keep the line of credit open is well worth the peace of mind. If i get nailed with a drive-by-layoff i can always write myself a check up to $100k. That's enough to pay my mortgage and utilities for about 5 years. If i still couldn't find a job i could sell my house, payoff the LOC, mortgage, and still walk away with cash (the house has appreciated about 100% since i bought it).

      Of course there are other savings i'd draw on first:
      - regular savings
      - savings bonds
      - cash value of my universal life insurance policy
      - the money i put into my Roth IRA (not the earnings)

      The important thing is to prepare BEFORE events like this occur.

    14. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like it when someone gets anothercountry-centric instead of US-centric for a moment, do you chief?

      Better get used to it. In case you can't tell, the early 21st century is the beginning of the end-game for the good 'ol USA.

    15. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and enjoy purchasing your 350K 1 bdrm condo or 700K house.

    16. Re:If they have skills, they'll find jobs in NoVA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you really say that??

      anyway i think it was stupid on slashdots part to include the virginia comment...if only by the fact that noVA has the highest concentration of bandwidth in the world :) hehehe

  17. Not good news by FadedTimes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even though AOL is heading downhill and many people are happy to see them head that direction; it's never good news to hear that many people getting let go. I always hoped AOL would evolve and not sink.

    1. Re:Not good news by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I feel that if you choose to work for a place such as AOL or any company involved with illicit bussiness, you are responsible for the situation you find yourself in. Consider the construction crews on the Death Star....

      (Oh, if you're out of work for two years and finally a company offers, you're just as guilty as if hundreds of jobs are flying your way)

    2. Re:Not good news by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      ...I always hoped AOL would evolve

      Huh? Into WHAT?

  18. Breaking News.... by iammaxus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Slashdot Headlines Consistently Sensationalize Everything!!!

    1. Re:Breaking News.... by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      The company I was at about a year ago pulled something just as nasty. I heard this all firsthand from a few terminees. Apparently, their managers came up to them one morning and basically said "Hey, I need your help with something". They were led to the lobby and told: give me your badge. 'You don't work here anymore and aren't allowed on the premises. Your things will be sent to you.' they did this to about 100 people. According to the receptionist, there were about 30 women in the lobby crying their eyes out from the totally unexpected shock of being fired without any warning.

  19. New commercials? by Telastyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone have the over/under on the time it takes someone to edit the new AOL commercials with the swarms of customers asking for change into swarms of fired employees burning the place down?

  20. But with AOL on their resume.... by sharkb8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think even McDonalds would think twice about hiring them:

    Manager: "So do you have any customer service experience?"

    AOL Scab: "Well, I worked tech support at AOL for 2 years."

    Manager: "We only hire people who will fuck up small stuff. We can't handle AOL sized crap here"

    1. Re:But with AOL on their resume.... by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      Mybe he can get a job at NetZero

    2. Re:But with AOL on their resume.... by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Only if he relocates to Bangalore.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  21. Getting New Jobs by mordors9 · · Score: 1

    what are their hopes for finding new jobs?" With AOL's reputation for great customer service and product excellence, I would think that former employees would be snapped up....... what AOL..... oh never mind.

    1. Re:Getting New Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

      About the chance of you be becoming an intelligent, insightful individual, who would realise just how annoying your boldfaced nonsensical comments are

    2. Re:Getting New Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When you use bold for your whole post, it kind of defeats the purpose. I'd accuse you of being an AOLer yourself, but you have only minimal post formatting problems, no misspellings and you didn't post in all caps.

  22. Job chances? by cbdavis · · Score: 1

    Good luck! Oh, and have a Merry Christmas and a safe and Happy New Year!

  23. As an interesting side note.. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...The severance package was particularly generous, as it include two AOL trial CDs, with a combined total of 2048 free hours.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:As an interesting side note.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...The severance package was particularly generous, as it include two AOL trial CDs, with a combined total of 2048 free hours. ...all of which must used on the same account. Unfortunately, the hours are expected to expire within 30 days.

    2. Re:As an interesting side note.. by nurbles · · Score: 1

      ...2048 free hours...

      That must be used in the first two months...

    3. Re:As an interesting side note.. by PhilipPeake · · Score: 1

      I don't know why people modded this as funny. It really isn't.

      I worked for AOL (I was "aquired" from Netscape) for a while. When AOL finally decided to can the iPlanet venture I (and a few hundred others) got laid off (yes, just before Christmas) and AOL HR really couldn't understand why people were so pissed-off to find an AOL CD in the severance package. These people just have no brains.

      Back then, the method AOL used to lay off large numbers of people was to invite you to a mandatory conference call, and about half way in mention that if you had been invited, this was your formal notice of termination.

  24. New jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?"

    The PTO!

  25. HA by robyannetta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They shouldn't have spent all that money on sending out CDs no one wanted. Then they'd be able to pay everyone.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  26. Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
    What, you're just figuring out that a free market will seek out labor where it's the least expensive?

    See, that's why I've been honing my aggresive driving, sword-fighting and other misc. pizza-delivery skills: Jobs that can be done overseas will be done overseas.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by LeiGong · · Score: 1
      See, that's why I've been honing my aggresive driving, sword-fighting and other misc. pizza-delivery skills: Jobs that can be done overseas will be done overseas.

      WOAH! Hiro? Hiro Protagonist? Dude...like...watch out for that Raven guy, I hear he's after your ass and that cute chick YT. You know...just a heads up.

    2. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Dude...like...watch out for that Raven guy, I hear he's after your ass and that cute chick YT.

      Now I don't think Raven ever much thought about Hiro except when Hiro made himself a target. Hiro chased him down in the bamboo farm, Raven didn't even bother to see if his impromtu spear hit paydirt. At the raft, Raven only showed up long enough to kill the with man with Reason, the only one Raven saw as a threat. Sure, he tried to give Hiro the virus at the Black Pyramid, but he was trying to give every hacker the virus. The point is, while Raven was a major factor to Hiro, Hiro was barely a blip on Raven's scope. The only fight that occured was the virtual one that Raven eventually fiured out he didn't need to fight to win (And Raven did win, the Virus program was kicked off. Raven hadn't been told to stop Hiro from dropping his anti-virus).

      YT, well now I see why Raven has "Poor Implulse Control" tatooed on his forehead.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never could understand why Raven was outside the Black Sun in the first place--it just seems so out of character for him to be trying to infect programmers.

    4. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang around for a while. In another four years, you won't be able to tell the difference between the US and any other third world country. The only vaguely noticable difference will be the brand on the refridgerator box that people are stabbing each other to occupy for the winter.

    5. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Killjoy-Modus · · Score: 1

      Aggressive driving? Sword-fighting? Pizza delivery? Sounds like a Hiro Protagonist/Snowcrash kind of thing. Props to the Neil Stephenson fan!

      --
      A sig is just a sig, unless you can shoot it. Sig Steyr, for the distinguishing CT.
    6. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I never could understand why Raven was outside the Black Sun in the first place--it just seems so out of character for him to be trying to infect programmers.

      What are you talking about? He wanted to nuke the USA, and what better way than to kill the talent.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hy Hero!

    8. Re:Speaking of "welcome to 2000" by Digz · · Score: 1

      Dude, you forgot the essential ones that girls like.. Like numchuck skills.. Bowhunting skills.. ;)

      --
      SYS 64738
  27. Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    What's the point? 950 regular employees were just laid off for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER. What's going to stop the next employer from doing the same thing? What is the point of trying to build a career that can be stolen arbitrarily?

    The economy is doing VERY well. AOL is not about to go out of business. They still have millions of subscribers and they are probably earning about $40M a month in subscriber revenue. If the company were about to go out of business, that would be one thing. This is just arbitrary.

    It is standard corporate thinking. Just pick 1200 people and fire them. Who the fuck cares if they have mortgages? That's their problem. Short-term money grab thinking.

    Disney did the same thing earlier this year. In fact, they fired an ENTIRE STUDIO that was directly responsible for NINE FIGURES in top-line revenue. Why? Because they felt like it.

    This is no different. W-4 employment is a sham. No business would ever depend on a similar agreement for anything, especially anything upon which revenue depends. W-4 employment is unfair and obsolete, and layoffs like these are cruel, groundless and destructive.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    1. Re:Ok by SlayerofGods · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should form a union.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    2. Re:Ok by radish · · Score: 1

      Welcome to capitalisim, enjoy your stay.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Ok by daemonc · · Score: 3, Funny

      "The economy is doing VERY well."

      Have you been watching Fox News again?

      --
      All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    4. Re:Ok by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >>Have you been watching Fox News again?

      Don't you mean FAUX News?

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Ok by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > What's the point? 950 regular employees were just laid off for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER. What's going to stop the next employer from doing the same thing?

      Nothing.

      > What is the point of trying to build a career that can be stolen arbitrarily?

      The point is to build enough savings that you can start investing those savings and make some money.

      Once you've got enough cash in the bank, you look forward to being laid off. It's called "retiring, and they give you a couple more weeks' pay as a going-away present".

      Don't hate the idle rich. Become the idle rich.

    6. Re:Ok by grawk · · Score: 1

      You don't own your job. Your employer also doesn't own your life.

      AOL doesn't randomly lay off people, they specifically lay off the bottom 10%. Every company should do that. People who aren't capable of being in the top 90% of a group probably need encouragement to find new employment.

    7. Re:Ok by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are so out of touch with reality it's not even funny. There are many purposes to business, but being a guaranteed source of employment is not one of them.

      You may of course complain all you want about the whacked out corporate culture in North America and Europe, and I'll probably agree with you. It is whacked out. But your solution, making employment an entitlement, is even further out past the fringe of reason.

      Did you want AOL to provide "make work" employment for these people? Send them out back digging holes in the morning and filling them back up again in the afternoon? Send them all out in vans to shopping malls across the country to hand out AOL CDs?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Ok by jdludlow · · Score: 1

      What's the point? 950 regular employees were just laid off for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER. What's going to stop the next employer from doing the same thing?

      The free market system and a desire to finish IT projects and turn profits? Just a guess, since most corporations (you know, thos big evil things you blindly hate) need to employ people in order to get anything done.

    9. Re:Ok by thopkins · · Score: 1

      They weren't laid off for no reason whatsoever. Like any company, AOLs goal is to make a profit, not to provide jobs. If those 950 people were helping profits, they would still be with the company. If they wish now they can go help another company, although hopefully the next one will be smarter about having the correct number of employees. Or they could even start their own employee friendly company.

      Look, if AOL is really being dumb they will go out of business because another company will be smart and not fire people "because they felt like it." Maybe Disney fired those people because they could be a more profitable company without them. Maybe you think capitalism sucks, but communism is even worse.

    10. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      But your solution, making employment an entitlement, is even further out past the fringe of reason.

      I never said it should be an entitlement. Why did AOL hire them in the first place if they didn't need 950 employees? Being an employer carries a responsibility.

      Did you want AOL to provide "make work" employment for these people?

      Better than throwing them into the street after mortgages were signed.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    11. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Walt Disney was a capitalist? Right?

      "No matter what the provocation, I never fire a man who is honestly trying to deliver a job. Few workers who become established at the Disney Studio ever leave voluntarily or otherwise, and many have been on the payroll all their working lives."

      --Walt Disney

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    12. Re:Ok by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      This is no different. W-4 employment is a sham. No business would ever depend on a similar agreement for anything, especially anything upon which revenue depends. W-4 employment is unfair and obsolete, and layoffs like these are cruel, groundless and destructive.

      Say what you want about the "employment at will" system but what's your beef with Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate? :)

    13. Re:Ok by jdludlow · · Score: 1
      I never said it should be an entitlement. Why did AOL hire them in the first place if they didn't need 950 employees? Being an employer carries a responsibility.

      The responsibility they have is to the share holders. As an employee, if you don't understand that, it's your own fault.

    14. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Every company should do that.

      Oh good! Permanent 10% unemployment! That would be WONDERFUL! Let's see, that would be a perpetually financially powerless group of about 15 million people.

      And if someone happens to be in that 10% too often, well, I guess they get to live in a refrigerator box, right? We owe everyone an opportunity to earn a living, or we are being dishonest about the "pursuit of happiness."

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    15. Re:Ok by Aroma+7herapy · · Score: 1

      Yup, there's nothing like a good hard shaft for the bottom 10% every year to get the team spirit going at your company.

    16. Re:Ok by grawk · · Score: 1

      If you're the worst person in a group of 10, it's not doing you or the company any good for you to keep doing what you're doing. Find something you're better at, and switch to that. We don't live in a vacuum.

    17. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, since most corporations (you know, thos big evil things you blindly hate) need to employ people in order to get anything done.

      It's not the corporations. It's the lying rat fuck illiterate cheat bastard middle managers. You know, the ones who wait until escrow closes to announce layoffs. The ones who announce layoffs during the holidays.

      Cruel, arbitrary, dishonest and destructive.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    18. Re:Ok by Aroma+7herapy · · Score: 1
      hmm.. let me rephrase:

      Maybe you think bicycles suck, but airplanes are even worse.

      I prefer to drive a car you insensitive clod!

    19. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Like any company, AOLs goal is to make a profit, not to provide jobs.

      Yeah, well they shouldn't have hired them in the first place. The only justification for layoffs of thousands is Chapter 7. That's management's responsibility. They hired them. THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE EMPLOYEES' ABILITY TO EARN A LIVING. That's part of being a manager. They should step up to the plate and take care of their people. Not abandon and betray them.

      If those 950 people were helping profits, they would still be with the company...

      Maybe Disney fired those people because they could be a more profitable company without them.


      Or more likely they just felt like it. Those irreplaceable animators were responsible for $200 MILLION in top line revenue. That's several hundred thousand dollars per employee. I'd call that profitable.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    20. Re:Ok by cboscari · · Score: 1

      Oh, I doubt they were the bottom 10%. These end of year layoffs are usually timed so the company does not have to hand out a 4Q or yearly bonus checks, as well as to save on payroll costs for the final quarter to make the fiscal year look good (the calendar year and fiscal year often are the same but not always.) The reason I mention this was that at several companies I have worked for the criteria was to fire 1 or 2 people in every department that made the most vs others doing the same job. This usually turned out to be the senior/most knowledgable person. I can't explain it, I've just seen it/heard about it from HR people at companies I have worked for.
      Chris

    21. Re:Ok by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1
      I never said it should be an entitlement. Why did AOL hire them in the first place if they didn't need 950 employees?
      This has been standard operating procedure in business for many years. Anytime a company has lots of money, whether it's from profits, VC money or a big IPO, they will hire hundreds, sometimes thousands, of people they really don't need.

      Why?

      A) Executive ego. It's more prestigious and gratifying to the ego to be in charge of 500 people rather than 50.

      B) Executive laziness. The more people working for you, the less work you have to do yourself.

    22. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People with their head screwed on as crooked as you are the reason the U.S. won't be competitive in the world market place for long.

      There are millions of places to work in America. If you choose a publicly held company, you accept a certain amount of risk.

    23. Re:Ok by tabrisnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      He means W-4 vs 1099 employment.

      1099 is (not from the form name, but what it is used for) "Temporary/Contract worker", and the employee is responsible for all taxes, benefits, etc. However, a 1099 employer rarely pays enough to pay for benefits, and it's legally NOT THEIR PROBLEM. As a 1099 employee, you are legally self-employed as a contractor/subcontractor.

      W-4 employment is where you are legally on their payroll, they handle all the payroll taxes, benefits, etc, and you are a permanent worker (well as permanent as you can get).

      Hopefully this will help with any confusion. And I can be assured to not get a karma boost, as the moderators are much furthe down the page by now ;)

    24. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Interesting, isn't it, how nobody ever responds to the Disney example? Or the Disney quote?

      Maybe because it is a great example of people being laid off for no reason?

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    25. Re:Ok by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      You are so out of touch with reality it's not even funny. There are many purposes to business, but being a guaranteed source of employment is not one of them.

      I agree, but what happens to the great unwashed once automation bumps up the unemployment rate to 10 or 20 percent or higher? The usual, not-very-well-thought-out response is something like, "well, they'll just maintain and build the software and cool robots".

      Maybe Robotic Nation wasn't so far off.

    26. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, grow up. How the hell did this get mod'd up?

      All of my former colleagues at AOL were hoping like hell to be on the layoff train, which was very clearly coming. Four months pay for doing nothing but look for a less depressing job? No brainer.

    27. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's going to stop the next employer from doing the same thing?

      Absolutely nothing, thankfully. That's capitalism. If something were to stop the next employer from doing the same thing, you'd be paying more for everything, and you'd REALLY be bitching. Especially since companies would be going out of business, companies you depend on.

      What is the point of trying to build a career that can be stolen arbitrarily?

      Stolen career? A career is "a chosen pursuit; a profession or occupation." While someone's career may be in what they were doing at AOL, it should not be defined by 'AOL'.

      My current career is as a programmer/sysadmin where I work. However my career would continue (elsewhere) if I were fired. To prevent that, I have made sure I have many skills that make me valuable to my employer.

      You do not own your job unless you are the owner of the company. In all other cases, you work at the whim of the company that hired you. It is THEIR position, not yours. If you do not like this, then open your own business and work for yourself. That is the American way. Not grousing over how much churn there is at humongous mega corporations.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    28. Re:Ok by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better than throwing them into the street after mortgages were signed.

      I say this to the hypothetical person who is now in dire straits because he or she just signed a mortgage and then lost their job:

      If you didn't know this was a risk when you signed the mortgage, then you're naive at best, and fiscally irresponsible at worst. As long as we're talking about "carrying responsibilities", how about some personal responsibility?

      There are plenty of things YOU could've done to avoid finding yourself in such a dire situation. YOU could've saved up some money or not gotten such an expensive mortgage. If you're driving yourself at your financial red-line and praying nothing goes wrong, that's a pretty big risk you're taking, bucko. Regardless of how you rationalize it.

    29. Re:Ok by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE EMPLOYEES' ABILITY TO EARN A LIVING.

      Dude, you are either from europe, or out of your fucking mind.

      The company is not responsible for its employees. It's called at-will employment. You can quit anytime you want, for any reason whatsoever, and I can fire you anytime I want, for any reason whatsoever.

      I'm not being cruel and unusual, I know it sucks. My dad just lost his job after 20+ years of service and he is 'lucky' enough to get a few extra weeks pay to help them ship his equipment to China. He was less than 2 years from full retirement.

      It sucks, but that's how the market works. If you have a job, you have to

      1. Estimate how many months it will take you to replace your job if you get layed off.
      2. Make sure you have at least that many month's expenses in the bank
      3. If you're lucky, you'll get severance and unemployment too.

      If the world really worked the way you think it should, nobody would ever hire anyone, and we'd all be out of work.

    30. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just because you're employed doesn't mean the economy is kicking ass.

    31. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Better [to create useless jobs for these people] than throwing them into the street after mortgages were signed.

      If you take your views out to their logical conclusion, I think you will find the end result VERY SCARY. You wouldn't be able to afford a mortgage because you'd be paying higher costs on everything because companies would be wasting money paying people to not do anything. Can't you see that?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    32. Re:Ok by telemonster · · Score: 1

      RFID's could easily eliminate the majority of large retailer check out line jobs! So much for people working in service.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    33. Re:Ok by telemonster · · Score: 2, Funny

      "There are plenty of things YOU could've done to avoid finding yourself in such a dire situation. YOU could've saved up some money or not gotten such an expensive mortgage. If you're driving yourself at your financial red-line and praying nothing goes wrong, that's a pretty big risk you're taking, bucko. Regardless of how you rationalize it."

      (Sarcasm)
      But it was America's duty to do their share after 9/11 and shop! To not consume was to be un-american!

      What we have is short-sightedness.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    34. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of things YOU could've done to avoid finding yourself in such a dire situation.

      Such as? They got a good job. They bought a house. They were doing the responsible thing: what our society constantly encourages everyone to do every day: Get an education, get a good job, buy a house, get fired, watch your credit destroyed, become unemployable, live in your car. All that good stuff.

      YOU could've saved up some money or not gotten such an expensive mortgage.

      So they should have paid cash for the house? Mortgages are always expensive.

      If you're driving yourself at your financial red-line and praying nothing goes wrong, that's a pretty big risk you're taking, bucko.

      They took no larger a risk than the bank. Of course, the bank gets the house when the inevitable layoff happens. What does the employee get? You know, the employee who did all the work? Well, they get shit.

      That's called... uhhh ummm hmmm UNFAIR.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    35. Re:Ok by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Being an employer carries a responsibility.

      But that responsibility does not extend to lifetime employment. This may be a standard "right" demanded by unions, but having worked in a few union shops, it causes far more problems than it solves. If employees reserve the right to leave a company at any time for any reason, then the company should get the reciprocal right without having to ask your permission first.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    36. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be able to afford a mortgage

      I can't afford a mortgage now. I couldn't afford a mortgage when I was employed.

      because you'd be paying higher costs on everything because companies would be wasting money paying people to not do anything. Can't you see that?

      No. If those companies don't need the employees, they shouldn't have hired them in the first place. Once they are hired, the company is responsible for those people unless the company is going out of business.

      Firing people as a routine cost control mechanism is cruel, arbitrary, unfair and destructive.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    37. Re:Ok by Calroth · · Score: 1

      They took no larger a risk than the bank. Of course, the bank gets the house when the inevitable layoff happens.

      This tells me that they did in fact take a larger risk than the bank. The impact is larger, they lose their house.

    38. Re:Ok by telemonster · · Score: 1

      "I'm not being cruel and unusual, I know it sucks. My dad just lost his job after 20+ years of service and he is 'lucky' enough to get a few extra weeks pay to help them ship his equipment to China. He was less than 2 years from full retirement. It sucks, but that's how the market works. If you have a job, you have to " No, that's how the market works now. Short sighted! I bet when your dad started work, they counted on the company being loyal to their employees. If the employees worked hard and the company was profitable then the employees could expect to work their lives for the company and retire.

      If a company is unprofitable, it is understandable for them to WFR. But if the company is making millions in profit and they still shit on their employees "for the shareholders," that's pretty messed up. Remember, we can't compete with slave labor. Remember, we are the major consumers of our so-called American companies.

      It's basically short-term gains. Over time the foundation that makes up the profits of these companies will be stripped away. People in turd world nations aren't going to have the income to buy the products from our companies at the same prices we do.

      Of course, we see what happens when our companies sell their products at reduced prices in other parts of the world, and Americans try to buy the products at those reduced prices (Canada + Drugs). All of a sudden people are crying FOUL, so much for globalism.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    39. Re:Ok by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Precisely. Back in the mid to late nineties my company hired far more employees than it needed. Then the crunch came and we no longer had the cash flow to support redundant projects and the people developing them. We didn't have the cash to support one secretary for every ten employees. We didn't have the cash to support a dedicated web developer for each department's internal announcements site.

      Life's a bitch and she's not fair either.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    40. Re:Ok by DogDude · · Score: 1

      UNFAIR.

      Yes, life is unfair. Fortunately, most of us learn that at a very young age, either from parents, or from experience. Get over it.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    41. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      I can't afford a mortgage now. I couldn't afford a mortgage when I was employed.

      Based on your understanding of how capitalism works, and your choice of nicknames on /., I am starting to understand why that is.

      No. If those companies don't need the employees, they shouldn't have hired them in the first place.

      Please go back to school and pay attention in economics class this time. Companies' needs change over time, their ability to make money and support all those people and make money also changes over time. The market changes and companies must change with the market. If AOL does business in fantasy land as you propose, they WOULD go out of business, and instead of firing 950 people they'd be firing their entire workforce.

      Once they are hired, the company is responsible for those people unless the company is going out of business.

      Christ on a cracker. I am now convinced you are a moron, and have filtered you out properly...

      Please, I beg of you... please read some books on economics and capitalism. These companies are hiring people to do a job, as long as that is needed... they aren't adopting children fer chrissakes.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    42. Re:Ok by bombadillo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In Iraq they are paying Iraqi's to perform jobs that can be done more efficiently with modern technology. Why are they doing this? To create jobs and distribute wealth into Iraq. Similar things were also done during the Great Depression. Keeping a stable society comes at an expense. Corporations are in the Business to make money. However, they are also making their money from society. Therefore they should have a moral obligation to also do what is good for the community. I understand that lay offs are necessary to keep a company in business. However, Corporations that lay off people to soley chase huge profits should be taxed more than a company that keeps it's employee's. Similar to the idea that the idle wealthy should be taxed more than the working wealthy.

    43. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We owe everyone an opportunity to earn a living, or we are being dishonest about the "pursuit of happiness."

      Pursuit of happiness. Not guarantee of happiness.

      Unfortunately, some work and responsibility is required on your part to achieve happiness.

    44. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Cruel, arbitrary, dishonest and destructive.

      What was your name for the company managers when they were hiring people that "they really didn't need" (as you put it)? Would those people have been better off for that period of time they had a job, without a job?

      If companies really had to treat employees as adopted children, with a lifelong responsibility for them, not only would you see the economic effect in the prices of everything, you'd find it a lot harder to get a job in the first place.

      Based on your understanding of economics, I think you should be praying to god that you were ever hired in the first place.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    45. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Interesting, isn't it, how nobody ever responds to the Disney example? Or the Disney quote?

      Maybe because it is a great example of people being laid off for no reason?


      How do you expect anyone to refute a quote taken out of context, or a firing of some unnamed division with no supporting context?

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    46. Re:Ok by paitre · · Score: 1

      Similar to the idea that the idle wealthy should be taxed more than the working wealthy.

      Both of which I -vehemently- disagree with.
      But then, I'm an anti-income/wealth/property/etc tax weirdo :) I'm much more into use taxes/fees :)

    47. Re:Ok by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Or more likely they just felt like it. Those irreplaceable animators were responsible for $200 MILLION in top line revenue. That's several hundred thousand dollars per employee. I'd call that profitable.

      1. That revenue was not on an ongoing basis, but based on certain years of movie profits based on their work, with no guarantee of future performance.

      2. this article at NPR sums up the layoff: "The decision is part of Disney's ongoing move away from hand-drawn animation in favor of computer-generated cartoons."

      3. Disney is under no requirement to continue to produce a certain type of product just to keep people employed. They are phasing out hand-drawn animation, thus they do not need to employ animators that do not work with computers. Those animators will have to find other jobs doing hand-drawn animation, create their own companies, or improve their skillsets to include computer-generated animation skills.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    48. Re:Ok by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see this stated a lot, yet noone provides any meaningful figures. Notice I said meaningful. Anybody can and does pump up the numbers.

    49. Re:Ok by bonius_rex · · Score: 1
      No, that's how the market works now. Short sighted!

      I don't see any indications that the market is going to work any differently in the immediate future. That may be short-sighted, but it's just being realistic.

      I bet when your dad started work, they counted on the company being loyal to their employees.

      I'm sure they did, but the world is a fundamentally different place now. Back then, it was reasonable to expect to work for the same employer for your whole life. That just isn't the case anymore. I'm not saying that this is a desireable state of affairs, it's just the state we find ourselves in.

      Remember, we can't compete with slave labor.

      No, not without some sort of import tarrifs.

      <tinfoil hat=on>
      A weak dollar is like an import tarrif on everything.
      </tinfoil hat>

      The grandparent post was basically saying that all employers should guarantee employment forever. That's insane. If that were the case, I wouldn't even hire the kid down the street to rake my leaves.

    50. Re:Ok by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      That scare story has been told for a couple of centuries. New technology has always been heralded by dire predictions of massive unemployment. But it's never happened as a result of technology. Never. SOME people get displaced, to be sure, such as the poor television repairman out of work and living under a bridge for the last thirty years because vacumn tubes were made obsolete. But claiming automation is going to cause double digit unemployment is ludicrous. In fact, new technology CREATES employment. Odds are, based on your Slashdot readership, the job you now have did not exist thirty years ago. I know mine didn't.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    51. Re:Ok by bombadillo · · Score: 1

      I'm much more into use taxes/fees

      What if every road had a toll? The problem with this is that some areas would be better developed. Like the cities. The suburbs and small towns would be left with little infrastructure as the population density in that area would not be able to fund roads, schools , etc. Of course maybe moving most of the american populace would be a good thing for the environment. However, even the cities in Europe fund public transport with taxes and ticket fees. Our society would also be less educated. With out taxes only people with kids would be paying for the schools. Only the wealthy would be able to afford education. One of the great achievments of the 20th century was public education for the masses. We simply could not compete with out a large well educated work force. An even greater economic burden would be placed on families under a per use fee. The middle class and lower classes would get nickle and dimed to death to maintain the life style we have today. I can not see how this would be a step forward for society.

      Would we also pay a per use fee on the military? If my house burned down would I also have to pay the fire department for coming out to my house?

    52. Re:Ok by Sein · · Score: 1

      I'm from Europe.

      He's out of his mind.

      75% of americans are employed in small to mid-sized businesses with less than 200 employees, with the bulk being in the 50-100 range. Firing 950 employees is about equivalent to 5-10 Chapter 7 bankruptcies.

      Want job security? Stop by SBA.gov, get them to ship you everything they have on starting a business and sit down to plan. 'Course, then you're the one risking Chapter 7.

    53. Re:Ok by blitz487 · · Score: 1
      Once they are hired, the company is responsible for those people unless the company is going out of business.

      The company is responsible for living up to their end of the employment contract they signed with you. You are responsible for holding up your end of what you signed. If lifetime employment is not part of that agreement, it's quite unreasonable for you to impose it later on. After all, you aren't obliged to work for them for life, either.

    54. Re:Ok by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      There's nothing which should require employers to make work for their employees, if the market share of a company has decreased demonstrably then it's expected that they should lay off employees. When this happens someone must be gaining market share and so there should be jobs for these people somewhere(though non compete agreements may screw them over pretty badly).

      To a certain extent the same is true when a job has been replaced by automation though in that case someone(ideally the company itself if possible and if not the government) should provide assistance paying for retraining so that the employees can still work.

      In either of these situations or situations like them, laying off employees is understandable, if there isn't work there isn't work. However the idea that the moment our profit margins aren't quite what they might have been we lay off employees and force the ones who remain to work twice as hard is just plain wrong and in the long term destructive.There are plenty of ways to trim costs without firing the people who actually do things at your company.

      I also think that a company should have at least as much responsibility to their employees as they do to stockholders. A minor fluctuation in profit margins is not a sign that the company is going under and shouldn't affect stock price to any great degree. There are essentially in my mind 3 kinds of stockholders, initial investors who have special deals and are usually well paid off for their risk by the time it gets to layoffs, long term investors who shouldn't be too bothered by minor fluctuations, and worthless parasites who make their money by screwing people. Day traders, this is you, the purpose of the stock market is to make it easier for companies to procure capital investment by spreading it out over more people, if you want to make 30 grand today you're helping no one but yourself.

    55. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are plenty of things YOU could've done to avoid finding yourself in such a dire situation.

      Such as? They got a good job. They bought a house. They were doing the responsible thing: what our society constantly encourages everyone to do every day: Get an education, get a good job, buy a house, get fired, watch your credit destroyed, become unemployable, live in your car. All that good stuff.

      "They" bought a house that was too expensive, lived close to the edge with no savings or saftey net, lost a job and expected to be picked up again at the same salary in a downturn economy with a higher amount of competition for jobs, and didn't sell the house when it was viable to do so. Many financial experts recommend that you have 3-6 months of income in liquid assets including cash, savings or money market accounts which "they" could have put together when employed, instead of getting a big screen TV, 500-channel digital cable, and a new car. After losing "their" job, "they" ought to be getting unemployment for some time (ever since 1935, it's the law) to supplement the liquid assets "they" have put aside. During that time if "they" don't find work, "they" should put the house on the market since someone employed at Walmart can't make those outrageous payments on the $400,000 home, and "they" have to re-evaluate "their" lifestyle. Sell the SUV, buy the used Focus.

      Last I checked, an employer hiring you on wasn't making a lifelong guarantee, and neither was the employee. A few years ago, people were hopping jobs so fast looking for sweeter deals that I couldn't keep track of who was working where. Funny, I never see anyone saying the workers ought to feel guilty for leaving a some small business that can't afford to pay any more, only that the business ought to be feel bad about letting go workers when they can't afford them.

      And don't boo-hoo me. I have a lot of friends that lost their jobs in the .com bust and associated IT downturn. Two are extremely under-employed and working at retail stores, one took a lower paying IT job out of the area, one found another IT job at comparable salary, one left IT and went into cooking, and one started his own (IT) business. Two of them had wives and kids, but none of them were living beyond their means, and none of them ended up living in their cars.

      Unfair is expecting that someone else is obligated to keep you in the comfort to which you have become acustomed, especially when it was beyond your means to begin with.

      --

      I just hold up my paw and say "Bah!"

    56. Re:Ok by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Firing people as a routine cost control mechanism is cruel, arbitrary, unfair and destructive.

      NOT firing people as a cost control measure when finances are shaky is cruel to everyone else in the company, because it will ensure a 100% layoff when the entire company folds!

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    57. Re:Ok by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      But you really must define "shareholders".
      The corporate officers in a company are
      shareholders, too, and frequently rather
      large shareholders at that -- part of their
      compensation package. The current US MBA
      standard apparently is based upon avarice,
      not good governance. Employees provide
      either a direct or indirect benefit to the
      company -- that's why they were hired to
      begin with. But if the company's earning
      look to be flat or decreasing for the fiscal
      quarter, the corporate officers will not get
      their bonuses. By slashing the workforce,
      they immediately see a short term improvement
      in their bottom line. Usually this is enough
      for them to qualify for their bonuses. The
      longer term financial impact on the company,
      however, is frequently negative because they
      have RIFfed many of the higher salaried workers
      who know the company and the product line the
      best. The outside shareholders (mostly mutual
      funds) don't know the inner workings of the
      company and base their decisions only on the
      quarterly financials. So long as that looks
      great, the mutual funds will not apply pressure
      on the corporate officers for better (long term)
      management decisions. When things go wrong (very
      wrong, like Enron or WorldCom) everyone holding
      their stock is surprised except for the corporate
      officers. And nobody takes care of their own
      like corporate officers -- the high salary and
      fat bonuses are exceeded only by their generous
      "golden parachute" when they decide to bail out.

      A prime example that was in the news this year:
      Grasser bailed out of the SEC (a proportdly non-
      profit organization whose corporate officers'
      salaries are supposed to be regulated (by law).
      After 3 plus years of service (and some really
      shady regulatory dealings), he bailed out (early)
      with a compensation package worth $245M USD.
      NY State AG Spitzer had been trying to get a
      partial refund of that very generous package,
      but I don't think he will be very successful.

      That is the current state of affairs with much
      of corporate America these days -- and with
      offshore outsourcing promulgated by a tax system
      that rewards them for moving overseas, even for
      relocating their corporate offices offshore to
      avoid paying ANY US taxes (Tyco comes to mind
      here). It is corporate welfare at the expense
      of the average American taxpayer, and especially
      the shrinking middle class (whose jobs shipped
      overseas).

    58. Re:Ok by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      So, it really is just business, right?

      You seem make a compelling argument for
      unionizing the American IT workforce,
      if only as a counter to the apparently
      inexorable flight of IT jobs overseas.
      Then the IT worker might actually have
      something to show for a retirement fund,
      instead of worthless stock in a company
      that goes belly up when their "profit
      through layoffs" finally becomes known
      for the Ponzi scheme it is.

    59. Re:Ok by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      The context of the quote is obvious.

      The division was the animation division in Orlando that animated Lilo and Stitch and Mulan. That's about $200 million at the box office and tens of millions more for the DVD sales.

      Disney fired 250 people who cannot be replaced because they "decided" 2-D animation wasn't profitable anymore.

      Of course, it's BEEN profitable for EIGHTY YEARS but who are we to argue with middle management?

      Meanwhile, in Japan, 2-D animation makes billions of dollars a year. There are four HUNDRED animation studios in Japan. Pokemon has a worldwide market of THIRTY BILLION DOLLARS. And yes, that's 2-D animation. The same animation Disney claims is no longer profitable. Well, they're WRONG.

      In that context, they fired 250 animators because they felt like it and wanted the short-term cash grab. Period.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    60. Re:Ok by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      By your logic if 10 people are amost equal, but one of them is behind by 1%, that they should quit and do something else.

    61. Re:Ok by MadHungarian1917 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the original reasons for creating corporations was in exchange for allowing the corporate structure to have the the legal rights of a person was so that the corporation would provide employment just as a sole proprietorship or partnership would. In exchange the investors were allowed the opportunity to accrete wealth

      In the late 80's the idea came about that the only purpose of a corporation was to 'Maximize shareholder value' as direct result we have seen the corporate scandal's and offshoring and the decimation of the manufacturing base.

      Congress needs to remind corporations that they have responsibilities to society as well as their investors.

      Directly answering the poster's point no-one has a right to a job but a corporate charter's intent is to create jobs AND wealth not one at the expense of the ofther

    62. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooo..

      If I sue you and get all of your money because of something trivial - you won't get pissed because you were treated unfairly?

      Live of the Grid and own nothing. Turn off your TV. Don't be a slave to capitalism.

    63. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What's the point? 950 regular employees were just laid off for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER.

      Okay, I'm posting anonymously because I work for AOL. I'm NOT giving specifics or clarifying anything that isn't publically known. That said:

      1) The number was less than 950.

      2) Most of those laid off were duplicate positions (eg. two different groups doing similar advertising or security or something similar). Not all, mind you, but a very large percentage.

      3) Most people were business and marketing. AOL Operations (geeks) were a very very very small percentage. Part of that was that Ops shaved their budget by $20mil in order to NOT lay people off.

      4) The few people who didn't fit the above and were still layed off were typicaly underperforming. Most of them should've known it was coming. If your boss has had meetings with you over the last few months discussing your performance problems, you should expect you're at the top of their list.

      5) Being on payroll until Feb 15th was done so that people would still be able to cash some above-water options which would be 50% vested on 2/14.

      Generally speaking, the severance is really more like 5-6 months for most people (payroll until 2/15, plus 2 months of severance, plus one week of vacation, plus 50% vested options @ ~$8/share profit, plus insurance through 2/15, plus placement assistance).

      Having been layed off in 2001 and given only 2 weeks severance myself, anyone who thinks AOL is fucking those layed off is a shithead. AOL did an amazing job of being more than fair with those that were being let go. I would've taken that severance package in a heartbeat. Anyone who can't find a new job in the next six months probably should be thinking about a career change.

    64. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The economy is doing VERY well. AOL is not about to go out of business. They still have millions of subscribers and they are probably earning about $40M a month in subscriber revenue.


      25 million subscribers * $23.90/month. AOL is a $10billion/year business. They also just had their most *profitable* year EVER. It's all about cutting dead weight and duplicate jobs. Not all corporations are pure evil.

    65. Re:Ok by mutterc · · Score: 1
      My interpretation of this is that the economy is doing well - for business. My local paper reported this a while back based on state corporate income tax revenues.

      The reason ordinary people don't think the economy is doing well is because it isn't for them - the economic growth is all going to investors. Shrug. That's what capitalism is all about. We can just eat cake.

    66. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'yer new to the USA, aren't you?

    67. Re:Ok by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you insightful if I had the points. I remeber reading Marx in high school and thinking he had missed this very point (Marx argued that automation would not help workers, just give more power to those with capital).

      Automation replaces workers; but history has shown the net result is lower wages, not less jobs. However, technology increases what you can buy with these "lower wages" *faster* than the wages go down, so the net result historically is that the average worker's total buying power goes up over time.

      The job I have didn't exist 30 years ago. No job existed that would let me buy a home computer 40 years ago, or a TV, dishwasher, washing machine, or electric stove 100 years ago. Funny how it works out.

      It's being caught in the changes that sucks. In the long term it works out well.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    68. Re:Ok by lgw · · Score: 1

      Disney decided that the future had no room for 2D animation. Maybe this was a stupid decision (I happen to think so), but even so, a company has the right to decide what business it will be in in the future.

      Disney would no doubt argue this was analogous to laying off the buggy-whip division. If it turns out this was analogous to getting out of the computer business because "the worldwide demand for computers will never exceed 4 or 5", Disney is allowed to be wrong.

      If 2D skills are still valuable, these guys will find work elsewhere and with decisions like this Disney will go under - the animators have a brighter future than Disney IMO. If 2D skills really are no longer valuable, then clearly Disney did the right thing. I guess what I'm saying is "don't attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetance."

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    69. Re:Ok by SlashSnot · · Score: 1

      and in related socialist news...

    70. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A corporation is only responsible for doing the right thing for it's shareholders. Doing what is good for the community is not always good business.

      If you have such a strong feeling, why don't you sign up for AOL and maybe someone will get to keep their job. You are not going to do that so quit your freaking whining about moral obligation.

    71. Re:Ok by Zondar · · Score: 1

      "Pursuit of happiness" is just that... allowing you to try to attain it.

      It's not a guarantee of success.

      Perhaps you would be happier by moving to a socialist state?

    72. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies think they are saving money by laying off the most senior and highly paid person. This is often followed a few months later by hiring a much cheaper greenhorn for a lot less money. Strictly on paper of course it works, and if they get lucky with the noob, in the short term at least it may even work in reality. Unfortunately the morale, knowledge loss, retraining and other factors can add intangable costs to this that may not make it nearly as big a win as the PHBs think it is.

    73. Re:Ok by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      How would you know how much risk you were in? The suits will always tell you that everything is OK, right up until they let you go. The job-holder has no real factual way to make an assessment.

      I agree that people in general *should* take personal responsiblity and make sure that they have enough in the bank to ride out some level of joblessness. That said, saving can be difficult.

      On the other side, however, how is it that AOL suddenly decided they did not need 750 or so employees? Did the business fundamentals suddenly change? No, they have probably been in decline for a while, with the suits in charge in denial or out to lunch or whatever. How about some "personal responsiblity" from them? How about guidance to the employee's in the same way companies provide guidance to "the market"?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    74. Re:Ok by bobcote · · Score: 1

      Bitterness may be unavoidable. I try not to be. I too have been laid off a couple of times in my career.

      Lifelong employment will not happen again unless you own the company.
      So remember to keep your resume and (portfolio, if it helps your job) up to date. Not on your work computer.

      Save your money and keep your skills sharp. You will survive layoffs. You will also survive these sermons.

      Best of luck former AOLers

    75. Re:Ok by SpawnClown · · Score: 1

      "> What is the point of trying to build a career that can be stolen arbitrarily?"

      "The point is to build enough savings that you can start investing those savings and make some money. "

      PROGRAM FAIL
      line#1 Sooo, Assume you are working and start saving... "... build enough savings..." But then you get laid off

      line#2 You start looking for another job.. You dont get one.. You look some more.. You dont get one.. You have to make payments a) house, b) car, ...etc. etc.

      line#3 You get a job.. But you have spent alot of money - like your bank account approaches zero ...
      and (goto line#1)

      'Once you've got enough cash in the bank, you look forward to being laid off. It's called "retiring, and they give you a couple more weeks' pay as a going-away present". '

      See PROGRAM FAIL

      "Don't hate the idle rich. Become the idle rich. "

      See PROGRAM FAIL

    76. Re:Ok by SpawnClown · · Score: 1
      "There are many purposes to business, but being a guaranteed source of employment is not one of them."
      We the people will determine the purposes of a business in our country.
      "But your solution, making employment an entitlement, is even further out past the fringe of reason"
      We the people have a right and even a duty to "kick" your kind or business out of our country. We the people will then form our own businesses which will nurture our people and not turn them out for cheap foreign labor.
      We dont see employment as an entitlement - but an "unalienable RIGHT
      Let's look at an important part of the Declaration of Independence: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. " One of the unalienable rights of Americans is to have a decent job without which the very notion of the other "unalienable rights" would have little or no meaning whatsoever! That is, if you don't have a decent job how in the world will you ever have a decent "Life" any "Liberty" or "Pursue Happiness"?
      SpawnClown - on SOCOMII
    77. Re:Ok by SpawnClown · · Score: 1
      "Absolutely nothing, thankfully. That's capitalism."
      See other post by SpawnClown.
      "However my career would continue (elsewhere) if I were fired."
      Ha! Really! Smug in what you "think" you know. A real survivor. So sure of yourself and your so called abilities...
      Some people only learn from HARSH lessons. Trust me - swaggering egos will be reduced to rubble... and the soul will whimper like a toddler.
      How sad.
      An optimist is often disappointed while a pessimist is sometimes pleasantly surprised
      i hate everybody except some family members. SpawnClown - on SOCOMII
    78. Re:Ok by lew3004 · · Score: 1

      Well, SOMEONE better start thinking of employment as an entitlement. The USA as a country cannot afford to have a more elevated level of unemployment than we already have. I mean, who's going to pay for all these neat new DoD toys if they have no source of federal income? Last I heard, aircraft carriers and submarines are in the billions of dollars each and that's just 2 types of ships in the entire Naval arsenal. And THAT's just the Navy. Mind boggling. Anyway....the if the military and the president want more toys and government programs, they better make damn sure that the vast majority of citizens are employed; especially high end middle class jobs.

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
    79. Re:Ok by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the government should make no effort to change that.

      You got mugged? Life is unfair. Why should you expect the cops to do anything?

      Your company decides not to pay you for your last two weeks of work? Life is unfair. Why should you expect the courts to hold them liable?

      The police decide to confiscate your car because you resemble someone suspected of dealing drugs. Life is unfair. Why should the government stop irresponsible cops?

      Just because you've got a slave mentality doesn't mean the rest of us do.

    80. Re:Ok by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They have a responsibility to society too. We gave them the privilege of incorporating, and we have the right to take it away.

    81. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the bank gets the house when the inevitable layoff happens.

      You've never owned a house, have you? There's a little thing called equity that you have more and more of as you pay your mortgage payments. If you lose your job, you could sell your house and make back every penny (and usually more) that you've paid. Granted, if you've only been there a short time, you won't have much equity, but you always have the option of selling and moving into a cheaper place to live.

      If you missed out on refinancing your house at the HISTORIC low interest rates we had recently, then you're probably too stupid to be a homeowner.

    82. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're comparing apples to oranges. Either make an intelligent comment, or go back to school and learn enough to make one. I suggest a course in logic.

    83. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wasting your time on cubicledrone. He's a bed-wetting socialist (like most of the crud here on slashdot) and he'll never have the mental capacity to see the logic behind your post.

      Jobs belong to the employer. A person's responsibility is to educate themselves and develop the skills that an employer may need. I get the feeling that cubicledrone didn't pay attention in school and was laid off from a low paying job that he hated anyway. Tough shit.

  28. I don't see how.. by proteonic · · Score: 0

    working at AOL can be a favorable attribute on a CV for other IT jobs. I didn't RTFA. Did they get into specifics of what types of positions were let go?

  29. In related news by Albanach · · Score: 4, Funny

    In related news, the USPS today announced 1,250 redundancies after a recent analysis suggested a 90% reduction in 2005 postal volume from the Northern Virginia area.

    1. Re:In related news by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      And in still more related news, assault rifle sales nationwide have skyrocketed.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    2. Re:In related news by eneville · · Score: 1

      Is that because UPS dont have huge boxes of AOL distibution CDs to ship?

  30. You had Goons? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    You're lucky. All we had was office equipment and we had to defend ourselves. And we were thankful for our office equipment.

  31. AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I predict that Time Warner (formerally AOL Time Warner) will soon be selling off the AOL division and is trimming the fat first. After being sold, AOL would probably become what just another brand name for internet service. AOL offers almost zero value to Time Warner... and Time Warner investors lost tons of money in the merger. (AOL investors, still losing lots of money, didn't lose as much as they otherwise would have because of the merger cushioning the fall of overvalued AOL)

  32. AOL's too expensive by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Last month, the company released a new version of its software designed to lure new subscribers with antivirus software and other online safety and security features.

    When will AOL learn. People are leaving because competitors are offering cheaper and faster services. If you want to stay competitive, lower your prices. People are not going to continue to pay $23.90/mon. when they can get DSL for a couple dollars more, or dial-up for less than $10/mon.

    1. Re:AOL's too expensive by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1

      That's really harsh, using AOL's own search engine to prove how ludicrously overpriced their "service" is. I mean, come on... you could at least save them a little face and use MSN Search or something.

      --
      GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    2. Re:AOL's too expensive by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, I didn't even have to do a search. It's right there on their main page, right next to where it says "Popular Searchs." Just click on "Internet Service."

    3. Re:AOL's too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sure, but they need to lower their expenses first if they're going to lower their cost. How do their lower their expenses? Firing a few hundred employees is a place to start...

    4. Re:AOL's too expensive by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      People are not going to continue to pay $23.90/mon. when they can get DSL for a couple dollars more

      In my hometown (Dayton, Ohio), SBC/Yahoo has been advertising DSL for $20/month for the first year. I think that's finally drilling the point home to my mum, an aol user.

      Don't get me wrong. I actually do think AOL provides a valuable service for novice computer users. However, it quickly reaches a point where the training wheels have got to come off... otherwise their just slowing you down.

    5. Re:AOL's too expensive by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1

      AOL is owned by Time-Warner, no?

      AOL is the n00bie internet user product.
      Roadrunner is the more savvy faster product.

      Mixed households can use AOL Broadband.

      --
      v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
    6. Re:AOL's too expensive by midnightthunder · · Score: 1

      Look at the situation:

      AOL's customer base is shrinking now.

      Their CD's are still arriving in your mail at an almost constant rate in various clever little packages.

      As others are stating, DSL has become competetive or more than competetive. I have even heard advertisements for DSL from reputable companies for UNDER TWENTY DOLLARS.

      Frankly this is also a threat to Earthlink.

      If AOL fails to find a way to compete, then the churn and attrition in their customer base, will overwhelm their ability to compensate with their free hours and blizzard of CDROMs.

    7. Re:AOL's too expensive by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      SBC Yahoo DSL is about on par service wise with AOL. I have yet to hear a positive user experience regarding them.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:AOL's too expensive by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      I've only heard bad things about them as well, but on the other hand they are broadband... albeit from what I understand very crappy, unreliable, and slow broadband.

      I think given the choice, I'd probably rather have crappy broadband than awesome dialup. Of course, many of the things I do are either bandwidth intensive or need low ping connections... others still require perpetual or scheduled access to the net. Maybe some people with different usage patterns would prefer good dial up.

    9. Re:AOL's too expensive by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1

      Um they have Netscape ISP $9.95/month

    10. Re:AOL's too expensive by XorNand · · Score: 1

      Had SBC/Yahoo DSL for 3 years, both in NW Ohio and Detroit Metro areas. I had an outage once, lasted a few hours. My experience is that the service is rock-solid. It isn't exactly speedy, but certainly beats dialup.

      I just switched to RoadRunner last week. (Left SBC because I loathe their customer "service".) Going from 384k to almost 3m down is mind-blowing. However, I have noticed a higher latency and a couple of hickups, esp. with their DNS services. If it doesn't get much worse though, I can live with it. The installer said they're slated to go to 6m Q1 next year, so I'm hoping that entails some system upgrades.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    11. Re:AOL's too expensive by Doctor_D · · Score: 1

      Yeah, SBC sucks, to put it nicely. It was always a living hell when you needed to ask a question or get an issue resolved. I just learned not to bother them. I started out with 768K down and 384K up, and over the years SBC cut my upstream bandwidth (without saying a word), so at the end I still had 768K down and only 128K up. (I had business class DSL so I could have static IP's and host my website and mailserver.)

      Then when I left Toledo it took them 3 months to get me an accurate final bill. (ie they kept trying to charge me a month of service that I didn't have--ala my service was disconnected before their billing of that service occured.)

      I loathe SBC enough that I will never do business with them again. In fact right now at my new apartment I have RoadRunner and it's been wonderful. I also got my parents to get RoadRunner also, and it's been working well for them. Of course for them, it certinatley beats 26.4K dialup.

      Oh, and as for SBC's service. I noted in my DSL Router's syslog it would show disconnects at 3am lasting for somewhere between a few seconds and 15 minutes. And then early on there were lots of hiccups with the service--which thankfully settled down. So a rule of thumb when it comes to SBC--the less you have to deal with them, the better off you are.

      --
      "If you insist on using Windoze you're on your own."
    12. Re:AOL's too expensive by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I've had roadrunner for a few years and everyone i have ever talked to with it has loved it, Had a minor issue with an unstable cable modem but it only took a call to tech support to authorize a replacement unit and the speeds with roadrunner are almost always blazing fast.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:AOL's too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netscape.com is $9.95/month. It's AOL without the AOL client. low cost dialup isn't their problem, capturing the broadband market is, and unfortunately bundling AOL with broadband isn't cost-effective in the US like it is in Europe.

    14. Re:AOL's too expensive by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it doesn't heavily depend on the regional manager or whatnot. I know people who had SBC in the DFW area as well as kansas city, and it was horrible for both of them up to and including regular outages(DNS and connectivity) and dialup level speeds much of the time

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  33. They don't need employees by vlad_grigorescu · · Score: 1

    Now, I wouldn't get too worried about this. I don't know if I'm the only who noticed from their recent commercials, but they don't seem to need employees. It's the members that are coming up with all the good ideas...

  34. Ah the irony by UnCivil+Liberty · · Score: 2

    {S Goodbye

    *watches post get modded away*

    --
    Distributed proteome folding @ WorldCommunityGrid.org
    Team Slashdot - Members:#1 Run Time:#1 Points:#1 Results:#1
  35. Hrm by techsoldaten · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the one hand, I feel really bad for all those people having to find places to go in the NOVA job market. Right before the holidays too, raw deal.

    On the other hand, I bet that whinny, nasally actress in the commercials playing the mother sneaking into the AOL boardroom is having a fantasic Christmas. She's probably making tons in residuals for one or two days work.

    AOL must have spent hundreds of millions broadcasting those commericals, I hardly even watch TV and see them all the time. It's almost as bad as the promotional CDs that still pile up everywhere in my home.

    1999 taught me never to trust a company that spends that heavily on marketing.

    M

    1. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NoVA job market is hot right now. I was laid off back in June, and was working at another company (at a higher salary) three weeks to the day after I got the boot.

    2. Re:Hrm by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      God that character is annoying. On the other hand, that ad campaign provided source material for the latest NetZero campaign, which isn't bad.

  36. New Jobs? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Troll

    what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    Who fucking cares? They worked for AOL!

    Seriously, these people worked for a company that is HATED by IT professionals all over the world. Why should we care if they can find new jobs after they were used up and thrown away?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:New Jobs? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Seriously, these people worked for a company that is HATED by IT professionals all over the world."

      Perhaps, but it may be more important that they worked for a company that every HR Manager in the world has heard of.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:New Jobs? by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      Seriously, these people worked for a company that is HATED by IT professionals all over the world. Why should we care if they can find new jobs after they were used up and thrown away?

      I dunno. Human empathy? Too much to expect I guess. I guess when one's primary means of socialization is through a computer screen, some amount of alienation is to be expected.

      I also used AOL's straight PPP service because my employer had a deal with them. No better or worse than any other ISP, didn't need their weirdo dialer or anything. Their abuse desk is awesome too. When was the last time you got spam from an AOL account?

      I wish I could say I was above hate, but I certainly can't fathom feeling actual hate for someone just because they work for AOL. It just doesn't register with me.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  37. funny... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

    how several of these comments are along the lines of "AOL on a resume would look awful", "AOL scabs", "what skills".

    many IT managers would snap these folks up. AOL is a very well recognized name. i didn't RTFA, but any IT people getting laid off bothers me, regardless who they work for. i think about what it would be like to be in their shoes.

    regardless of where they work (the market seems a little tight lately), remember that they're people just like most of us on /. trying to get by in this crazy field.

    my 2c...

  38. Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Assuming you have real skills, not a problem at all. . . I routinely ignore 2-3 pings from headhunters a day here in NoVa. . .and I'm mostly a Windoze admin these days.

    Admittedly, as I'm cleared, I have a far easier time finding work in DC Metro, but this area is about as recession-proof as it gets. . .

    Yeah, clearances help, but Homeland Security is hiring people, either directly or as contractors, by the metric butt-load. DOD is growing, as are some new dot-coms in Northern Virginia.

    Now, if you're in Marketing or Biz Dev, it may be another story. . . .

    1. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, clearances help, but Homeland Security is hiring people, either directly or as contractors, by the metric butt-load.

      Has anyone here worked at the Department of Homeland Security? If so, how was your experience?

      I was thinking of applying for an internship over there for this summer, but the overall public view of the department is that they're somewhat clueless. Does anyone here have a perspective from the inside?

    2. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The company I work for flew me up here from half-way across the country so I could work here. I now have benefits, full-time employment (40 hours guaranteed), and respect amongst my employees. I know its not salary, but the overtime makes up for it. I've had no college experience and am 21. The DC Metro area is a great IT hot spot. P.S. No security cleareance yet, but it is almost a requirement around here.

    3. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Has anyone here worked at the Department of Homeland Security? If so, how was your experience?"

      It depends on which division of Homeland Security you work for. I worked for FEMA before and after it was swallowed up by DHS. From a union standpoint it sucks in that the Bush administration was successful in busting the federal employee's union. Otherwise, if you don't mind peddling fear it is a great job.

    4. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the downside is that you live in NoVa. That place still gives me nightmares.

    5. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1
      I've worked for Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and TSA. Both are BADLY in need of expertise, but both are also run badly by their main IT contractors: in ICE's case, Northrop-Grumman IT, and at TSA, Unisys Federal.

      But the REAL problem in DHS, is the bureaucratic infighting, which will take YEARS to settle down. OTOH, get lucky on the right program and program manager, and you can ride it to the top. . . .

      INS, ICE's predecessor has NEVER renewed a 5-year IT support contract, and the contract is just about over. But UNISYS has 3 years left, and is looking hard for talent: mostly Windows environment, but some Solaris and RedHat Fedora is picking up, heavy CISCO, and heavy on security skills. And they CAN hire you without a clearance, if you're good enough. Send me email if interested, I know a few hiring managers over there. . . . .

    6. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by OldAndSlow · · Score: 1
      My Navy contract got cut, and I got laid off. After 7 weeks looking I had 3 offers. I'm a java guy, but I've also got 30 years experience (major minus!). Northern Virginia is as hot a job market as I have ever seen. If you have skills, you'l get a job.

      Today (my second day on the job) I was roped into 2 interviews. Neither candidate could explain how they would go about designing a solution. One had 6 years experience and the other 10. *sigh* Good talent is rare.

    7. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by quarkscat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh yeah, right!

      Let's see. You are a Windows administrator
      (probably with an MSCE cert), and have a
      security clearance.
      Guess what? Since DHS has settled on MS
      OSes (read some irony here), AND you have
      a security clearance, then I wouldn't wonder
      that you are getting calls from headhunters
      every day.
      I have been staring at the VERY SAME "WP" job
      postings from government contractors for the
      past 1-1/2 years: the same title, job code,
      location, and scope of duties == same job,
      which cannot get filled because they are
      looking for current active TS/Poly/Lifestyle
      security clearances. These contractors will
      not hire uncleared personnel and "park" them
      somewhere until they get vetted for the security
      clearance (in 1-1/2 years and $50K USD later).

      If you are a "*nix" administrator w/o a security
      clearance, you are SOL. I should know. While
      I did come from desktop & server support, I had
      spend 7+ years on various "*nix" (HP, SGI, SUN,
      linux) servers and workstations as SA (plus CM
      and Deployment). Those jobs ARE NOT here anymore.

      I don't know what the RIFfed AOL employees will
      wind up doing for employment, but at least they
      have some breathing room with the 4 months pay.
      They could make a gamble and go into debt to go
      back to school, but I wouldn't recommend that
      personally. IMHO, the IT job situation is ONLY
      going to get worse (along with any high tech or
      many manufacturing positions.) And between the
      growing national debt and the horrendous balance
      of trade deficit, I expect the the old halcion
      days of the Carter administration will come back
      to haunt us -- with the state of the economy
      measured as the "misery index" (of unemployment
      rate, interest rates, and inflation rate).
      The Federal government has embraced outsourcing
      as "good for the economy", with a corporate tax
      structure that encourages moving jobs offshore.
      The destruction of trade unions, as well as
      forcing USA wages lower, appears to be the agenda.

      BTW: When the unemployment runs out, the jobless
      do stop getting counted. And one part-time
      McJob is just as good statistically as the IT
      job lost. What we are witnessing is the slow
      disintegration of the USA's middle class.

    8. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a team lead for a tech company in NoVa that mostly does government contracting and we can't hire people fast enough. To make matters worse we get into a bidding war with almost everyone we extend an offer to. Headhunters routinely call the developers at work and try to pull them off to other companies in the area. I can't speak for the rest of the country, but .NET developers are in high demand in the DC area. Most of the guys we hire are Java developers with little to no .NET experience, who we have to train in the technology we work with, because we can't find .NET developers fast enough.

    9. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by obiwan2u · · Score: 1
      "Since DHS has settled on MS OSes (read some irony here), AND you have a security clearance, then I wouldn't wonder that you are getting calls from headhunters every day"
      Actually, I heard rumors that the military is looking at Mac's because they view the massive amount of MS windows based viruses and worms as a security risk.

      This is just hearsay though.

      Ben in DC

      --
      Ben in DC
      "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
    10. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      "If you are a "*nix" administrator w/o a security clearance, you are SOL."

      Truer words have not been spoken.

      "When the unemployment runs out, the jobless do stop getting counted. And one part-time McJob is just as good statistically as the IT job lost. What we are witnessing is the slow disintegration of the USA's middle class."

      EXACTLY. Speaking as a laid-off intermediate *nix admin I know exactly where your coming from. There are no longer any "skilled" positions in this country that allow the average person to live at a high quality of life. You either have to be management making a decent wage and hate your job and probably your life or you get stuck in a job sector thats going to crap. If your lucky enough to have clearance and the skill to get a job.

      The jobs of today are being sent overseas, the jobs of tomorrow are not here yet. Great times we live in. People wonder why I want to leave ....

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    11. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by mailman-zero · · Score: 2, Funny
      metric butt-load

      What's that in the Imperial System again? I always screw up these conversions

      ...divide by 1.6 then carry the one...

      --
      Let's play video games with mailmanZERO
    12. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by mutterc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I personally agree with you about the economic collapse... my belief is that the U.S. will degenerate into a small amount of ultra-rich and everyone else roaming the streets foraging for food. However...

      When the unemployment runs out, the jobless do stop getting counted.
      This is incorrect. Unemployment stats come from surveys using random sampling. People who are actively looking for work but can't find it are counted (but people who gave up looking are not). See: http://www.snopes.com/science/stats/unemploy.htm
    13. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, I am a *nix administrator and right now I'm sitting in an office in NoVA getting paid while I wait for my clearance. :-p I guess it all depends on luck of the draw and what your particular skill sets are. But saying the jobs simply aren't there is false.

    14. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Frankly, most government positions seem to only care that you have a security clearance and are breathing. At least that appears to be how they hired a lot of the contracters I work with. I think they figure it is easier to hire an unskilled person with a clearance and train them up to do their job than it is to hire a skilled person and get them cleared. Clearances take 12-18 months now (although you can get interim secret a lot faster, if that is good enough) and there is no guarentee that you will be cleared. It also costs $50,000+ to the company/agency clearing you.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    15. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by frugle · · Score: 1

      The jobs of today are being sent overseas, the jobs of tomorrow are not here yet. Great times we live in. People wonder why I want to leave

      For years and years people flocked to America - the new promised land, to take up all the jobs that suddenly appeared...

      ...and now, a couple of hundred years later, America shunts all those jobs back overseas and people actually complain? Follow the jobs! be a part of a developing country again, and enjoy life while you do it.

      --
      http://www.frugle.co.uk/
    16. Re:Tech jobs in Northern Virginia ?? by 1lus10n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets start with the obvious. The US has only been an economic power since the end of WWII. Thats 1 lifetime, not even that in some cases.

      I have no issue leaving the US, perhaps you can explain to me which country wants to make me a citizen the second I hit their land so I can get a job without issue. Moving to another country to find a job when you are disadvantaged (being a non-national) and there are still an abundance of employable locals is not a desirable situation for anybody. The reason people flocked to america wasnt just jobs it was quality of life and freedom as well. There were tons of jobs available back in the day. People came here and got entry level jobs because the majority of the people here were already employed.

      Take a look at the countries with major economic growth. China and India might be growing fast but they are still decades away from being anywhere near having depleted their labor resources or pricing themselves out of the market. Thats the true problem, right now the hotbeds for jobs are decades behind the rest of the world in most respects. The quality of life here is going down, the quality of life there is going up slowly. The question is where the two will meet. What if the quality of life world-wide is poverty ? I dont see a rosy future the way the global economy is heading.

      Of course I am a pessimist.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  39. Mista Prezadint - where can I get a JOB? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    Ask the president for a job:

    well mr president - it's the bees and the spiders again - they stole my food stamps and sold 'em to the rats, and I tried to get down to my car to honk the horn for help, but the snakes are guarding it for the cockroaches! I go back upstairs but the spiders have jammed the police lock - I AIN'T BEEN INSIDE FOR A WEEK!!! And I know my wife is sleeping with the bees!!!!

    Could you state that as a question?

    Well, SURE Mister President! WHERE CAN I GET A JOB?

    Many busy executives ask me, "What about the job displacement market program in the city of the future?" Well, count on us to be there! [JIM] Because, if we're lucky, tomorrow, we'll never have to deal with questions like yours ever again.

    Oh he's just jivin' me again...

    SHOES FOR INDUSTRY!
    SHOES FOR THE DEAD!

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Mista Prezadint - where can I get a JOB? by ewhac · · Score: 1
      SHOES FOR INDUSTRY!
      SHOES FOR THE DEAD!

      Hi! I'm Joe Beets! Say, what chance does a returning deceased war veteran have for that good-paying job, more sugar, and the free mule you've been dreaming of? Well, think it over.

      Then take off your shoes.

      Now you can see how increased spending opportunities means harder work for everyone, and more of it, too! So do your part today, Joe. Join in with millions of your neighbors and turn in your shoes.

      (From the Firesign Theater)

  40. But the good news is... by GarrettZilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This layoff was announced weeks ago, it's really no surprise. But for the employees who are staying, AOL rented the new Udvar-Hazy Smithsonian Air & Space Museum for the Christmas party.

    --
    Ecce potestas casei!
  41. i can see it now... by KinkifyTheNation · · Score: 0

    India On-Line

  42. hopes for finding new jobs? by Cromac · · Score: 1
    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    Assuming these were tech positions, if you were a hiring manager would you look favorably on someone laid off from AOL with all of the other out of work tech workers on the market?

    As /. knows AOL doesn't exactly have a terrific reputation among technical people.

    1. Re:hopes for finding new jobs? by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 1
      As /. knows AOL doesn't exactly have a terrific reputation among technical people

      Not true at all. I know people at AOL, and people who know people at AOL, and everyone pretty much agrees that the average technical level over there is very high.

    2. Re:hopes for finding new jobs? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Ask them what they think of AOL. Just 'cause AOL doesn't have a good reputation doesn't mean the sysadmins aren't any good.

  43. Fact: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In Soviet Russia, vodka would solve this and any other stressful situation.

  44. Massive? by vought · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple. March 14, 1997. That was massive layoffs.

    This? Not a big deal, by comparison. I don't think the headline is misleading, but it is a little sensationalist.

    I feel for those losing their jobs. hopefully they land on their feet and get decent separation packages.

    1. Re:Massive? by zaren · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Also, see: Worldcom. 2000?-2002. By the time I'd cut myself loose of them, they had laid over over 30% of their ENTIRE WORKFORCE. Worldwide. That number grew to (I believe) 50% by the end of 2002, from 80k employees to 40k - 17,000 employees purged during a sweep in 2002 alone. Heck, when I got laid off from the University of Michigan back in 2003, I was one of 500 that got the axe.

      Sure, those 750 from AOL get my sympathy - I used to support their dialup network when I worked under the Worldcom banner - but I don't know if this qualifies as massive... unless there's fewer people working for AOL than I expect.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  45. Their chances in Northern Va? by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    Uhhh, very good, especially considering the fact that is right on top of DC and hence a great place to work as a government contractor. Not to mention there are a few other major ISPs around. It has been called the second Silicon Valley more than once.

    1. Re:Their chances in Northern Va? by borgheron · · Score: 1

      People call it Silicon Alley around here. ;)

      --
      Gregory Casamento
      ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  46. is it me or are the scores getting lower? by StarsEnd · · Score: 1

    After reading the responses to this post, I find it interesting that most score low


    (
    All I can say is, good luck former AOL employees....I hope you find better positions at more promising companies...

  47. Severance? by underworld · · Score: 2, Funny

    Severance packages are known to include up to four months of FREE AOL SERVICE!

    Woo hoo!

    1. Re:Severance? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 0

      What would you get if they really don't like you -- 6 months?

  48. Their chances of finding work? by fooguy · · Score: 1

    There is 2% unemployement in the DC area, and in nearby Fairfax county it's only 1.5%. I think their chances are pretty good.

    --
    "All I ever wanted was to see Larry Wall give Bill Gates a Perl necklace."
    http://www.eisenschmidt.org/jweisen
  49. This sounds more like a Fark thread than /. by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

    "With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?"

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    1. Re:This sounds more like a Fark thread than /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been noticing fark and slashdot getting closer with regards to stories. That is, closer than usual.

  50. Getting fired in Northern Virginia isn't so bad by geekplus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take it from someone who lived there up until 5 years ago, and whose parents still live there -- the average price of a new home in Northern Virginia has stayed rock steady at about $600,000 (totally unscientific hand-waving based on neighborhood drive-bys). My parents' houses have both almost doubled in value in the last 5 years *and* stayed there.

    No.Va. has benefitted tremendously from the steady upswing in government spending post-9/11. Last time I went back and drove around a bit the number of new and under-construction office buildings was stunning. Getting fired sucks, but if you want a liquid job market -- NoVa's a great place to look.

    Point being -- don't sob too hard.

  51. "What are their hopes of finding new jobs?" by geekwench · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Given the knowledge, or rather the lack of knowledge, shown by most AOL techs, I'd say that their prospects don't look good. Any company that wants their employees to do, you know, real tech support instead of parroting a script** (and then trying to sell you something) won't touch them with a 3.5-meter-pole.


    **Yes, I have dealt with them. No, I won't provide details. It was too traumatic. ;)

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
    1. Re:"What are their hopes of finding new jobs?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to shatter your world, but the "AOL techs" are not the ones doing "tech support". Call center staff do tech support. Techs are the people that make services run, write software, et.al.

  52. Netzero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like they all left to work for NetZero.

  53. Old news by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone from AOL (I presume higher-ups) that uses craigslist posted the news last night about the layoffs at 10:05PM EST. You can see the original post here.

  54. holidays..... by Mako.h · · Score: 0

    right before christmas?! inhuman.

  55. you've got... by L0stm4n · · Score: 1

    ..a pinkslip!

    --
    superman runs linux
  56. Project for the New American Century by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Funny

    American On (the Unemployment) Line

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  57. it's actually not too bad, IMO by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    AOL has local access numbers everywhere, whereas most cheap dial-up ISPs don't. If you travel a lot, the local dial-up is nice.

    As a "portal", it depends on what you like. My parents like it, and I know some other people who do as well. The email is also easier to use than setting up POP3 or IMAP plus SMTP, especially if you want to use it from multiple locations, although with gmail that may no longer be a major strength (but most people who sign up for AOL don't have the infinite stream of gmail invites we technically-oriented people do).

    1. Re:it's actually not too bad, IMO by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Your mom-and-pop ISP might not (are there any of those left?) but there are at least two, and possibly more, "bulk" US nation wide ISPs. One lists prices at $4.25/month/user.. Been a while since I looked at monthly dial-up rates, but it would stand to reason that there is at least one national ISP with sub $5/mo rates.

    2. Re:it's actually not too bad, IMO by paitre · · Score: 1

      I know of a couple ISPs, still in business, profitable, and have been around since the mid-90's (pre-bubble) that would -easily- qualify as "mom and pop".

      I worked part time at one of them and installed their second portmaster and modem bank for them back in 1995 :)

    3. Re:it's actually not too bad, IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In further defense of AOL as a dialup service...

      Your $23.90 gets you 7 screen names, and chez nous (two adults in the household) we are utilizing six of them, each with distinct missions and raisons d'etre: trash for web signups, one for receipts from online shopping, one for personal contact, a couple for pr0n, etc. To get six names under the "bulk" pricing plan cited here would be $25.50/month - more expensive.

      Virus safety: AOL has been been scanning inbound and outbound email _on_ their servers for many months now - not just with the introduction of version 9.0SE.

      Their "Saved on AOL" online folder service provides 100MB online storage of desired email per screen name, and it's accessible from any IMAP client software, as is your Inbox - I use Thunderbird to download and preserve what I don't kill.

      They provide a simple dialer which gets you connected - you don't have to run the piggy AOL client software to "connect to the Internet", or read any of your email.

      Plain text email (the way g-d intended it to be) is still available.

      Spam control is also pretty straightforward and turn-key using the AOL software.

      Was a lot of this too long in coming? Absolutely. Do they still have major problems? Of course. But on the whole, their value has increased dramatically in the last 18 months. Comcast isn't bringing a cable into our apartment anytime soon (our choice), so there we are.

    4. Re:it's actually not too bad, IMO by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Untrue.

      Most "cheap" dialup ISPs (sub $10/month) use one of several wholesalers (GlobalPops, DialupUSA, cisp.cc, Ikano), all of which have very thorough nationwide coverage. AOL and Earthlink used to have a few pockets where they had close to exclusive access because Sprint was the local phone company, but Sprint recently announced they are bailing from the dialup wholesale internet business.

      AOL, Earthlink, United Onlinie (Juno/Netzero/Bluelight) and MSN all make extensive use of Level(3) as their CLEC dialup partner, which is also used by the "cheap" ISPs - their phone calls all terminate on the same equipment, and at least on the access part, there is no functional difference among them.

      In addition, the cheap ISPs also carry extra networks like Megapop, uu.net (worldcom), ICG (now owned by Level(3)), and Pacwest or O1 in California, Paetec in the NorthEast US and others.

      If you want to see this in painful detail, go to http://www.findanisp.com/ - go to a city of your choosing, and select the "Complete POP list" - you'll see more information there about the dialup business in your city than you ever wanted to know.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  58. ABSOLUTELY NO REASON? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ummm how about AOL doesnt want to retain them? A company is not in business to provide handouts for employees, its in business to make money. Plain and simple.

    If employees benifit, its purely a side effect.

    Sounds like you need to grow up before you leave your parents basement and head out in to the real world...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  59. northern virginia boom by Dugh+Daren · · Score: 1

    my understanding is that northern virginia is going through something of a tech boom right now. especially if they don't mind going into the defense sector. i'd be more worried if they were here in the SFBay area; things suck enough out here!

    1. Re:northern virginia boom by telemonster · · Score: 1

      The boom that is funded by taxpayer dollars and future debt. Yay for war spending. The bulk of the money will go to the rich and powerful at SAIC, BAH and other such gov't contractors.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  60. finding the jobs of the 21st century by ctour · · Score: 0

    Their hopes of finding jobs of the 21st century are alright, it will be a tough fight though. Wal-Mart isn't hiring that many new stockers and cashiers right now. Taco Bell and Burger King might be a good place to start looking. As for a good paying job to replace the one they lost... Forget about it. Welcome to the new American Dream, you will be satisfied with less, you don't have a choice.

  61. Virginia, huh by vandelais · · Score: 1

    I think the military is hiring.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  62. You got CANNED! by BestNicksRTaken · · Score: 1

    Erm, mail...

    Hell AOL was never any good anyway, dumb ISP, ruined Netscape, ruined WinAMP....

    --
    #include <sig.h>
  63. It seems to be the beginning of a trend by zarthrag · · Score: 1

    950 may not seem like a lot, but that's 949 other people who will likely compete with you for new jobs in the same career field and local area. Not to mention all of the other unemployed in the area.

    I must give AOL credit for at least giving them benefits/severence - I got no such thing after working at "Innotech". I just wish them luck - most of them will need it.

    --
    Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  64. woo hoo by XxXoldsaltXxX · · Score: 0

    i hope they layed off the entire "aol support" section. they really gave no help to us geeks at all.

  65. Change their middle Initial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And re-apply to AOL, they will hire you in an instant.

  66. Since when is 750 people massive? by nberardi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since when is 750 a massive amount of peole. Kodak was laying off 1000 people every 4 months up in Rochester, and about another 2000 worldwide.

  67. NoVA by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

    what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    If they don't mind working for the government, they're great. The area has a lot of tech jobs and potentially even more if the intelligence office proposed in the new overhaul bill has a technology component.

    I however, am a government contractor in that area and don't want to work for the government anymore and the market is going to be flooded. Looks like I'm stuck working for the Man a while longer...

  68. At least AOL is kind of nice by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Keeping them on unitl February? Severance packages?

    When I was at Netscape during layoffs in 2001, I TRIED to get myself laid off by crank calling Steve Case and leaving him angry messages about our lack of a working espresso machine.
    Friend of mine that was laid off got a $25,000 check, continued health coverage, and 3 free months of AOL dialup.

    Recent gig (spammers) that laid me off gave me a whopping week and then screwed me out of my accrued vacation time. Bastards.

    I *wish* I'd have gotten a package like those at AOL!

    They'll still be unemployed, but the severance packages sure help out a lot. :|

  69. work for competitors? by whovian · · Score: 1

    With companies like SBC and Verizon expanding their high speed services, I would think there could be a few job openings.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  70. Re: they'll follow their jobs by grqb · · Score: 1

    They'll follow their jobs, to India of course.

  71. Linux AIM beta! by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 0

    Yes!!Now one of the disgruntled/unemployed hackers will release AOL's top secret Linux AIM port.
    Oh wait...

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  72. here's a suggestion for them.. by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Funny



    what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    I recommend they print up millions of copies of their resumes and mail them out to everyone in the United States. If they play their cards right, they should be able to get computer manufacturers to place an icon for their resume on the desktop of every computer sold. They should also cut deals with publishers to include their resumes bundled with mainstream consumer magazines. They should print their resumes on non-biodegradable media so that someone will start a website called "NoMoreAOLResumes".

    Appropriate plug for above reference.

  73. The Biggest Loser in all of this ? by lateralus_1024 · · Score: 0

    The Post Office.

    They may have to crank up the price of postage to 75 cents per stamp.

    --
    If you think /. comments are bad, check out Digg.
  74. Open Sourcing works! (See Mark Twain for details) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hooray, proof that Open Sourcing the Netscape code was a great decision and helped AOL fight back the rising tide of Internet Explorer, which has been relegated to a small niche player in the brower arena.

    Remember:

    1. Develop code.
    2. Open source it.
    3. Profit!
    4. Layoffs!

    Sun is making a similar brilliant move in its gradual (plodding, shuffling, reluctant) attempts to open source its operating system, which will surely bring it financial success and allow it to dominate over its long hated "closed source" rival Micro$oft.

    Ye reap what ye sow.

    Mark Twain wrote The Adventures of Tom Sawyer in 1876 in Hartford, Connecticut. In Chapter 2, he tells the story of how Tom Sawyer managed to convince other boys to do work for him. Sound familiar? Are Bruce Perens, Eric Raymond, Tim O'Reilly, and RMS the Tom Sawyers of the software world?

    From Chapter 2 (edited for space, with bold emphasis mine):

    Saturday morning was come, and all the summer world was bright and fresh, and brimming with life. ...

    Tom appeared on the sidewalk with a bucket of whitewash and a long-handled brush. He surveyed the fence, and all gladness left him and a deep melancholy settled down upon his spirit. Thirty yards of board fence nine feet high. Life to him seemed hollow, and existence but a burden. Sighing, he dipped his brush and passed it along the topmost plank; repeated the operation; did it again; compared the insignificant whitewashed streak with the far-reaching continent of unwhitewashed fence, and sat down on a tree-box discouraged. ...
    But Tom's energy did not last. He began to think of the fun he had planned for this day, and his sorrows multiplied. Soon the free boys would come tripping along on all sorts of delicious expeditions, and they would make a world of fun of him for having to work -- the very thought of it burnt him like fire. He got out his worldly wealth and examined it -- bits of toys, marbles, and trash; enough to buy an exchange of work, maybe, but not half enough to buy so much as half an hour of pure freedom. So he returned his straitened means to his pocket, and gave up the idea of trying to buy the boys. At this dark and hopeless moment an inspiration burst upon him! Nothing less than a great, magnificent inspiration.

    He took up his brush and went tranquilly to work. Ben Rogers hove in sight presently -- the very boy, of all boys, whose ridicule he had been dreading. Ben's gait was the hop-skip-and-jump -- proof enough that his heart was light and his anticipations high. He was eating an apple, and giving a long, melodious whoop, at intervals, followed by a deep-toned ding-dong-dong, ding-dong-dong, for he was personating a steamboat. As he drew near, he slackened speed, took the middle of the street, leaned far over to starboard and rounded to ponderously and with laborious pomp and circumstance -- for he was personating the Big Missouri, and considered himself to be drawing nine feet of water. He was boat and captain and engine-bells combined, so he had to imagine himself standing on his own hurricane-deck giving the orders and executing them:

    "Stop her, sir! Ting-a-ling-ling!" The headway ran almost out, and he drew up slowly toward the sidewalk. ...
    Tom went on whitewashing -- paid no attention to the steamboat. Ben stared a moment and then said: "Hi-yi! You're up a stump, ain't you!"

    No answer. Tom surveyed his last touch with the eye of an artist, then he gave his brush another gentle sweep and surveyed the result, as before. Ben ranged up alongside of him. Tom's mouth watered for the apple, but he stuck to his work. Ben said:

    "Hello, old chap, you got to work, hey?"

    Tom wheeled suddenly and said:

    "Why, it's you, Ben! I warn't noticing."

    "Say -- I'm going in a-swimming, I am. Don't you wish you could? But of course you'd druther work -- wouldn't you? Course you would!"

  75. Obsolescence by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    What is odd about the "new economy" (if that is what it can be called) is that each progressive iteration serves to put more and more people out of work in favour of automation and more sophisticated software.

    It looks to me like talented programmers and developers are gradually putting themselves out of work.

  76. Revenue -- You're an order of magnitude off... by lax-goalie · · Score: 1

    They still have millions of subscribers and they are probably earning about $40M a month in subscriber revenue.

    They've got 22 million subscribers. To keep the math easy, say they're billing 20 mil @ $20. That's 400 million dollars a month in subscriber revenue. Cash.

    You're an order of magnitude off. Where's that cash going? It's not staying in the AOL division, for sure. Time Warner's been using AOL as a cash cow, and they've been sucking it dry for years.

    1. Re:Revenue -- You're an order of magnitude off... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      you obviously have no idea how small 400 million dollars is in hte scheme of things at Time Warner. Most people in that company feel AOL is a lag on business, not some cash cow to be milked. That 400 million dollars you are riving about doesn't even hit 1% of total revenue to Time Warner. They bring in over 41 billion dollars a year in revenue (http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=TWX).

      So why would they lay off so few people? It obviously can't be to randomly inflate profits for a quarter or two because of the sheer amount of money we are talking about. For example, Lets say these ~1000 people are making about ~80,000 a year(I'm over on both numbers probably). Then we are talking about 8 million dollars saved by Time Warner. Now lets see what this does to their profits. They made(EBITDA) over 6 billion last year. So what is 8 million on this scheme of things? 0.75% or so. People do not make such foolish business decision to increase profits by less than 1 percent.

      These lay offs come probably because AOL is seen as a huge drag on the Time Warner company(hence the reason it is no longer AOL Time Warner).

      Before you try to say anything about money or the financials of a major corporation, try to do a tiny bit of research so you don't sound quite so ignorant. It took me a total of 2 minute to look this stuff up.

    2. Re:Revenue -- You're an order of magnitude off... by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      excuse me, my math was slightly off, 8 million, when compared to the EBITDA, makes up about 1.33 percent(I hope I didn't miss it this time). But to highlight what it means against gross profits, it is just under 0.5 percent.

  77. eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  78. The answer is: "Massive Layoffs at AOL" by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

    I know Alex. What is: The real answer to the last slashdot poll

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  79. Good sign by Coolnat2004 · · Score: 1

    AOL losing money is always a good thing. I know it may sound mean, but they are a big, greedy corporation with horrible internet service. The AOL process alone takes around 30 megs of memory, and that must be running to be connected. It's just not right.

  80. Change careers by gorfie · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that in 20 years IT jobs will be as widespread as manufacturing jobs. I'd consider medicine, but that too can be sent to the lowest bidder given current/future technology (plus insurance and legal are giving doctors hell).

    I figure I might have a chance as an auto mechanic, same thought processes only applied to engines.

    I also think lawyers will still be around (unfortunately), which also uses the same basic thought processes.

    Unfortunately, the profession that I enjoy most (programming, server administration, network/pc troubleshooting, security, etc.) will likely not be around as cheaper labor (overseas, automation, kids, aliens, etc.) floods the market.

    I just hope I can hang in there win the shit really does hit the fan (2000 was nothing).

  81. 4 months? by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    Considering that I wouldn't work at AOL (or any tech company) for longer than four months anyway, getting four months free is basically a free job.

    Maybe this is corruption? I wonder if those un-reported contractors are getting free money too.

  82. New Commercial by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Burger King Grunt: We've got a bunch of new applications from some former AOL employees.

    Burger King Manager: Which ones?

    Burger King Grunt: [pointing out window] All of them!

  83. Clarification by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

    Quote not from the "article," but from page linked to by parent post.

    --
    The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
  84. Drug tests! by DogDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't bother. They require extensive drug tests.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Drug tests! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They asked that question on the form, and they will look into your finances and talk to your friends and neighbors, but I never had to take a drug test yet. Not that I am worried about it, bring it on.

    2. Re:Drug tests! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah...

      Didn't stop GWB

      Cocaine, ....????...., DWI, abused alcohol.

    3. Re:Drug tests! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, false. They just ask you to fill out a form detailing every time you've ever done a drug, then they put you in a room with a real serious looking ex-cop who asks you stuff like "what if someone threatened to tell your parents you smoked weed?" and "have you ever gotten treatment for eating mushrooms?" and "what's it like being on acid?"

      Shoulda' seen the look on this guy's face when I told him the last time I smoked herb was last night.

      This was just for secret; other levels may have different rules. I've heard that TSI requires a polygraph test, but I've never heard of a drug test.

    4. Re:Drug tests! by danielobvt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you hold TS or higher(I know they claim there is nothing higher, but the kickers like SCI require a more in depth background investigation, so I think its a matter of semantics) one of the requirements is a being in the pool for random drug tests.
      I must say that I am suprised you got past adjucation with that attitude toward drug use. They tend to not like anything more than experiementation in the softer drugs (weed). When did you get your clearance?
      For anyone wondering why people get clearances denied, this site can give you a pretty good idea on the general reasons people are denied clearances.

    5. Re:Drug tests! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't want some REEFER ADDICT selling out his country for a JOINT!

  85. Tis the season... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    An entire division of my former company was laid off today. Fortunately(?) there were only five people left to lay off, but since thats the entire floor of a building, I guess that qualifies as "massive". BTW the reason it's my "former" company is because I was laid off a year ago (along with the 20 or so others in my group)

  86. He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I once got passed over for a job because I did not have a University degree, I have a 3 year community collage diploma. Now I thought this was odd, because the job was to modify and maintain source code that they had purchased from my ONE MAN company a few years before.

    1. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "community collage diploma"

      Mwahahaha. So, it's made of a collage of communities?

      The idea of someone trying to get a job with a community college "diploma" is funny enough, but a community "collage" diploma is hysterical.

    2. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a community "collage" diploma is hysterical.

      I have a degree in cinema. Now I'm wishing I had gone to this guy's school so I could have gotten a community montage diploma -- it sounds so much prettier!

    3. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem isn't with degrees or experience ... most of the time people don't want to hire you knuckleheads because you've all got the personality of a kumquat.

      College degrees mean crap in computers, anyway. Most of the better developers either don't have a degree, or have some throw-away degree like animal husbandry or forest sciences.

      You get paid for what you've done and what you know, not for where you went to school. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot who will soon see his group's productivity plummet from hiring a bunch of pedigreed graduates with little experience.

    4. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think they just gave you that as an excuse.
      If that was software that YOU wrote then they're probably more concerned with your reactions to anything they might ask you to do with the code, fearing you might dissagree with something and start in on "I WROTE this so I know your wrong and I'm right", or possibly that you might think your intimate knowledge deserves more pay than they want to spend (which it likely would to be honest).
      Also the fact that you're going from a one man company to an employee makes them wonder if your not planning on quiting as soon as things get better and possibly taking any clever ideas they've shown you into a new product based on your old one plus thier 'trade secrets'.
      I could see where they could view hiring you as like hiring another employees s.o./ex-s.o. (and the way some people are about thier code it could be worse!).

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    5. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having a community college diploma essentially means you're useless. You'll end up working in the food service industry and programming shitty little freeware programs nobody uses.

    6. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Visual Basic. :)

    7. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      The problem isn't with degrees or experience ... most of the time people don't want to hire you knuckleheads because you've all got the personality of a kumquat

      Personality is not reflected in the tens of thousands of resumes received for tech jobs. You are lucky if you even get a chance to show personality in a face to face interview.

      College degrees mean crap in computers, anyway. Most of the better developers either don't have a degree, or have some throw-away degree like animal husbandry or forest sciences.

      Not true. I just got a fairly high paying tech job about 6 months ago based on my degree and past experience. I had a 1 1/2 yr downtime where I sent over 9,000 resumes out before I landed this one. Luckily it pays well and I like it. Even if it hadn't I would still stay here after all of that.

      You get paid for what you've done and what you know, not for where you went to school. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot who will soon see his group's productivity plummet from hiring a bunch of pedigreed graduates with little experience.

      Times are changing again. This was true in the .com days, but no more. The first half of that statement is what gets your resume in the trash bin these days when the employer wants someone who they can pay minimal and doesn't have enough experience to leave ASAP. The 2nd half of this statement ...well that is just flamebait. Thanks for contributing to the hatred/holier than thou/anyone-who-doesn't-believe-me-is-an-idiot mentality on this board. Like I said, myself and many of my friends are finally seeing results from our degrees and past experience in the last year. Job growth is fairly steady right now. However, I don't think there will ever be enough jobs to fill the void left by the .com bust where anyone who knew how to install a sound card could get an IT job.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    8. Re:He can't get a job, thats nothing.. by bynary · · Score: 1

      Not to further beat the dead horse, but degrees do matter these days. I work for a large (read very, VERY large) corporation that produces all manner of computer-related gadgetry and the manager that hired me won't even consider people for positions if they don't have at least a four-year degree in a relevant field (CS, CIS, MIS, EE, etc.). The software dev. team I work with all have at least a B.S. and many have an M.S. or Ph.D. in CS. Trust me, degrees do matter. The System Architect on our team has so many diplomas (he has an M.S. in CS from Stanford among others) on his wall that you wonder how he had the time to do all that, and he's only in his early thirties. I passed up several people for my job who had worked here at least twice as long as I had in part because I had a degree and they didn't, and these are mostly intelligent, hard-working people...the point is, that piece of paper with the fancy writing matters, so get one.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
  87. Peanuts by Ranger · · Score: 1

    A thousand people is NOT a massive layoff. Sucks to be them regardless. A massive layoff would be in the tens of thousands.

    I can imagine a new AOL commercial. Instead of thousands of clueless AOLusers standing outside their offices, I see thousands of former AOL employees wanting their jobs back.

    Personally I'd like to see all call center jobs replaced by AI IVR's.

    I for one would welcome our new AI Call Center Overlords!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  88. Repeat of 2000 by heroine · · Score: 1

    Remember after George Bush II won the election in 2000 that CNN laid off most of their employees. Now once again an election has hit Time Warner's interests hard and a lot of people are paying the price. You could have predicted mass layoffs in AOL/Time Warner/CNN after the election.

  89. Expectations of a McJob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    " No, you'll get a job because you're fresh ... thus easier to pay. A Famous Programmer will want twice what a college grad will get..."

    Not when you're starving, you don't.

    1. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by klevin · · Score: 1
      Not when you're starving, you don't.

      Not kidding. Try explaining that to the recruiters/hr people. Heck, I'm stuck in the middle of nowhere `cause my last vaguely stable job left me here w/o enough money to move on (and have anything for food, much less housing, after moving). Nobody even wants to talk because "you're too far away." So you manage to survive on whatever little bits of work you can find and the generosity of family and friends (who are all dealing with hard times themselves).

      If I could find a bit of remote/telecommute contract work I could probably dig myself out, but no such luck yet.
    2. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if you're willing to accept what the cheapest Joe Schmoe would. Employers will still think you'll insist on a big salary.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    3. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they know as well as you do that if and when there is an upturn you will want more money (and if you don't get it you will quit)

    4. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by rjshields · · Score: 1

      Here's a solution - keep your living standards at the same level as a college graduate for your whole life. That way, you'll never be disappointed.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    5. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are likely joking, but really a lot of people live very close to thier means, or even past it.
      The minute they start making any significant amount over what thier used to after graduation they go out and run up credit card bills, buy toys, a nice car a nicer house, and so on.
      If they were to keep thier standards of living simular to what they had in college till all thier student loans were paid off and just save any extra and keep thier outgo (especially long term outgo such as house payments) down below what others at the same income level are doing they would find themselves much better off. Keep a credit card if you must, but never put on it more than you can pay off when the bill comes in.
      You'd be suprised how much you can save.
      I saved about $3k in 8 months on a 24k a year job by simply not replacing my pos car right when I could, never using a credit card, not buying every toy I saw, not having cable tv, no longer trying to have a bleeding edge PC (I've given in a little there since then). I didn't really short myself much (not having cable tv GAVE me time as well as freed up $$) I still ate out some, hung out with my friends, saw a few movies, bought a few games and read several good books.
      Of course if you have kids soon out of college the picture changes more than a little bit.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    6. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Keep a credit card if you must, but never put on it more than you can pay off when the bill comes in.

      Easiest way for me. I keep my credit limit low and spend at most my monthly limit. Since this is less than my monthly salary after taxes it is my way of saving me money and making sure I don't go over.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, unless you're very lucky, then a lot of your expenses are only partially within your control. For example if you're working in a particular city then you have to live there (or commute long distances every day which is expensive in and of itself) which means buying or renting a property. Here in the UK over the past decade or so house prices have gone insanely high, what even 5 years ago would have bought you a very nice house with a big garden in a very nice area now won't get you a studio flat in a slum. Salaries have not anywhere near kept pace. Where ever you live you're restricted as to who supplies your water (local monopolies) and usually you're restricted as to who provides your gas and electricity (in theory where ever you are you can have any supplier but in practice very few suppliers cover the whole country).

      About half to two thirds of my take home salary goes on things that I cannot directly influence (rent, water, council tax, insurance &c) and much of the rest (e.g. food, clothes, gas, electric, phone, Internet) I could cut it back but only so far (for example I could use my phone less but I have to have one due to work requirements so would still have to pay the standing charge).

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    8. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here in the UK....you're restricted as to who provides your gas and electricity

      I thought it was all castles and you could just pull up the drawbridge to fend off the bill collectors. Ahh the good 'ol days.

    9. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Here in the UK over the past decade or so house prices have gone insanely high, what even 5 years ago would have bought you a very nice house with a big garden in a very nice area now won't get you a studio flat in a slum."

      Join the club. Real estate in the U.S. are ridiculously overinflated as well. e.g. an ~900sq. ft. house in what I would characterize as an average blue collarish neighborhood, bordered by several not-so-nice blue collar cities goes for $160k USD. Houses in some, somewhat nicer white collar neighborhood, ~$2000 sq. ft. go for $370k+ USD, and the construction quality is crap at best, so the $160k house is atually a better deal from a quality standpoint as they were mostly constructed in the 1950s or earlier, are brick, have REAL plaster walls, nice little "features" like higher ceilings which would tack on $20k to the $270k+ house, etc.

      With this is mind the same houses 10 years ago went for ~$120k, and $225k+ 10 years ago, and $80k and $175k+ 15 years ago. Golly, wish my salary had an annual growth rate equal to housing prices. Apartments go for anywhere from $750 - $1200/mo for ok apartments. Or, you could always get a house in the ghetto for ~$45k if you're the adventurous type, and don't really need all those "services" your taxes go to "pay".

      Typically, real estate loans are given out at no more than ~3times the applicants gross adjusted income, which equates to ~$54k/yr for the "crap" house, or ~$118k/yr(min) for the decent house. Of course this can be lowered if you save your groats and can make some sort of sizeable downpayment, which for prior homeowners should be EASILY accomplished considering real estate price inflation, but for first time buyers that either means a rich relative, or saving for years. BTW: in the US don't forget to add in your insurance & property tax costs, which will be VERY high on the "decent" house.

    10. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --The trucking / hauling (CDL required) industry is always looking for people.

      http://www.cdl-course.com/index-il.html

      http://www.google.com/url?sa=l&q=http://www.truckd riving101.com&ai=BUXbNaDm3QZm8EYrSaa_1vb8E1rn1BsDc wZIB0pGdhgGQgxkQARgBKAgwATgASLs5yAEB&num=1

      --Believe me, I seriously considered it myself; and then was lucky enough to get a job at a gas station ~1 hour away from my house.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    11. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1
      ... If they were to keep thier standards of living simular to what they had in college till all thier student loans were paid off and just save any extra and keep thier outgo (especially long term outgo such as house payments) down below what others at the same income level are doing they...

      ...would be Japanese people. :=)

    12. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by stephenbooth · · Score: 1

      I haven't measured the squarefootage of the house I'm renting in right now but I'd guess it would be somewhere around the 800 mark. The area could be politely called a slum, a shit hole would be more accurate (rubbish strewn street, badly maintained roads, derelict factory units at the end of the road, rat infested additionally there's a major problem with teenaged and slightly older gangs and racial tension that means that the police won't come into the area after dark). The house itself has no central heating, double glazing, loft insulation or other 'improvements'. About 10 years ago it would have sold for about 20k UKP (about $38 at current exchange rates), 5 years ago for about 60k UKP ($114) and an identical one just down the road from me just went for 160k UKP ($304).

      Direct property taxes (council tax) are around 700 ukp pa. Contents only insurance (capped at 5,000 ukp for a total claim) comes to about 300 ukp pa, buildings insurance would be about the same again.

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    13. Re:Expectations of a McJob. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the money you saved on grammar and spelling books! After all, there not cheep.

  90. Re:If they gov't jobs.. by telemonster · · Score: 1

    There was just a major announcement that there are tons of new tech jobs being added in Virginia, to the sum of 4000+. The thing about them is they are almost all gov't jobs.

    What we have is private sector cutting their workers, and gov't contractors growing. I'd imagine a good portion is trickling down from all the war spending.

    As long as you have a clearance and some keywords for HR to scan for, I'd imagine you would do okay. But many in the private sector probably don't have such a thing, and with the recent expansion of gov't there is a lag in security clearance processing from what I've heard (wait time is a year plus for TS?).

    May the laid off take their smarts, get funding and form a new company to compete with the one that laid them off.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  91. Walt Disney is FUCKING DEAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, fifty years ago! OK, time to move into the 21st century now.

  92. Don't blame the economy. by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is with all the posts blaming this a sour economy?

    It is NOT an economic failing when an antiquated dealer of yesterdays technology downsizes...And then eventually goes away.

    Think about it. A majority of people are hooking up with local broadband dealers (cable, dsl, wireless), I would not be surprised to see AOL go the way of the Cart and Buggy dealers of old....And it will not be the economy that does them in, it will be the fact that their main product is obsolete.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:Don't blame the economy. by telemonster · · Score: 1

      AOL's parent company owns a large chunk of their competition.

      Road Runner = Time Warner. Time Warner = cable company.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  93. Tech job market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Since Congress again raised H1B levels in response to the extreme shortage of tech workers, obviously the market's booming. That or there was money involved for them.

    As Bush has said repeatedly, there're jobs for those "willing to work". Translated, that means desperate enough to take the $7 an hour to be the lead programmer and entire technical support department for a company using a custom contact management system. Of course for that sort of job, there are no benefits and it's on an as-needed basis.

  94. Re:Don't get too comfortable... by SpookyJim · · Score: 1
    I wouldn't be so relaxed. I'm active USN, and one thing I know about government contractors is they don't make THAT much. Job security is their biggest perk, due to the lack of any real benefits.

    Also, this is completely(!) speculation, but wouldn't your job in developing this system, specifically for mine warfare, be on the chopping block since all the mine sweepers (MHCs) are due to be decommissioned somewhere around the first day of the next fiscal year, with the MCM boats to follow.

    To add icing to the cake, the Mineman source rating ("job") in the Navy is being dismantled, and the Mine Warfare Training Facility in Ingleside, Texas is slated for closure. So what then? (Assuming this speculation is right on the money.)

  95. indeed... by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    i heard about it last month: a neighbor who works @ aoHell said they were cleaning out the mid-managers...

  96. 5+% growth by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

    Business in the greater DC area is booming. Over a 5% growth rate last year. Government IT spending increased by 60% in the last year to something like 160 billion. So, I'd say your chances of getting a job would be great. Though having AOL on your resume might not be the best thing. I don't touch any of their stuff on sheer principle.

  97. Re:Don't get too comfortable... by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

    Lots of good points!

    First, SAIC is an employee owned company, which has fostered a culture that offers nice benefits. Second, my salary is more than most of my college buddies doing the same thing in non-Gov't fields.

    As for your points about the upcoming changes for the mine warfare community, most of the work I've been doing lately has been for the organic airborne systems for the MH-60S. The Navy is indeed moving away from dedicated mine sweepers, and helos, UAVs, and UUVs appear to be the platforms of the future. Our software currently supports all of these platforms.

    You seem to know a lot about this field - mind if I ask what you do in the Navy? If you don't want to answer on /., feel free to email me.

  98. Recent AOL Europe layoffs, too by easter1916 · · Score: 1

    Mate of mine who works as a PM at their Dublin location is getting laid off this month too, along with a bunch of others... quite a decent severance package there too. He isn't worried, the IT market in Ireland has picked up a lot in the past year.

  99. Even worse........ by THESuperShawn · · Score: 1

    Their pink slips came in the mail attached to a "1550 hours free" CD.

    All joking aside, any tech layoffs are scary. My employer (~40k employees) just laid off 1400 worldwide, about 1k of them in the US.

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
  100. If they gov't jobs..-Big Government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There was just a major announcement that there are tons of new tech jobs being added in Virginia, to the sum of 4000+. The thing about them is they are almost all gov't jobs. "

    Yay! Go big government. Good thing we didn't get a Libertarian president.

    "What we have is private sector cutting their workers, and gov't contractors growing. I'd imagine a good portion is trickling down from all the war spending."

    Yay! Go war on terrorism. Who knew insecurity was going to be good for the economy, and unoutsourcable too?

    BTW With the weak dollar, America's becoming a shopping Mecca for Europe. Yay! Go service industry jobs.

  101. AOHell by planetgman · · Score: 1

    It is about time that internet users start to wise up and see that AOL's proapritary (sp) system is for old people sending email to their grandkids.
    I still am floored that people use AOL browsers.
    This is good news for the internet sine most of my AOL user friends are the ones who send me the emails for the free Mrs Fields Cookie Recipe or that Bill Gates will give me $1.00 for every email I forward.

  102. Welcome! by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1
    You've Got Mail!

    It's a pink slip!

    Goodbye!

    --
    How ya like dat?
  103. Same story, same holiday, different year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Oh, come on, this should come as no surprise. AOL cleans house every 6-12 months. Just Google "AOL Layoffs". AOL is nothing if not trapped in their horribly ineffective ways. Their layoffs are always ...
    • Arbitrary, usually laying off good people on succesful projects that show lots of promise (e.g. WinAmp).
    • Timely. This is two (or is it three?) years in a row they've done the "oops, we're not as profitable as we need to be for Q4 so let's shitcan some folks" thing right before X-mas. Happy Holidays!!!
    • Generous. Last year they offered the rank-n-file folks 2 months notice + 2 months severence. Managers got 4 months severence plus the full "Manager Incentive Bonus" (~3 months salary, I believe). Plus any accrued vacation is paid off, of course. Sounds like they're doing the same again this year.
    • Great for morale. I was in a group of ~15 people that lost half their team last year. 12 months later, all but 1 of the remaining team is somewhere else, or actively looking for a job.
    And, yes, I was laid off last year, and couldn't have been happier about it. It's a hell of a lot harder to find a company willing to pay for a 5-7 month vacation than it is to find another job.

    And to top it all off, all the AOL options that have been issued for the last 5 years are worthless and likely to stay that way, so nobody's crying over the loss of those.
  104. that will only work by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1

    until toyota perfects their crazy-driving, swordfighting pizza delivery robot!

    be brave....

    1. Re:that will only work by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      But when everybody is unemployed who will buy the pizza?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:that will only work by Odinson · · Score: 1

      The Robots!

  105. NOVA is pretty good for IT by Facekhan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Northern Virginia and the DC metro area are actually a great place to be in IT. Because of so many government jobs, we are largely recession proof. My advice is to get a job for Uncle Sam. There is not a lot of difference now between IT wages for the government and in the private sector at this point because the government still applies an IT bonus to your salary calculation and private sector salaries went down. New York City and DC are still the best places to be in IT.

  106. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Capitalist America, crappy ISP drops YOU!

  107. Re:Don't get too comfortable... by SpookyJim · · Score: 1
    It's good to hear you're at an advantage to most contractors. A lot of them enjoy some extra money. A lot are retirees, so of course their new pay is a boost, but they miss those bennies.

    I'm an IT, attempting to cross-rate to CTN. I recently returned from a mine-sweeper ported in Manama, Bahrain as part of a crew-swap iniatiative. (The Navy is downsizing, and trying to re-evaluate just how much manpower and training is needed to operate as usual.) I'm now currently at Navsta Ingleside. Whoda thunk? ;-)

    The systems you described sounds like a safer solution for sailors ("Any ship can be a mine-sweeper, Once!"). Let's just hope it doesn't rely on Windows ;-x

  108. Good, this will improve the lives of many employee by ferrocene · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look, I worked at AOL tech support for a year. In some towns, you can't throw a rock without hitting someone who hasn't (Ogden, Tucson, Reston, Jacksonville, etc).

    This is how it goes: normally, it's your first "real" tech job. Before this, you were the guy your friends and relatives called for help. In my case, it was my first job, ever. No McDonalds, no BK or Gap, or Orange Julius in the mall. Straight to the tech world. Your parents will be so proud.

    Then you actually start working there. The hell that is (nearly) 24/7 tech support with some of the dumbest people, both coworkers and customers, is nearly endless. You realise how large and illiterate most of America (nay, the world) really is. Not computer illiterate, the plain' old fashion kind.

    You enjoy the banana splits every time the stock splits, but you're a part time employee 'cause you're workin' your way though school. So you don't get any stock. Your fellow coworkers try to plan a coup and go on strike, form a union or something (which is strictly forbidden in the contract agreement). But it falls flat and you watch some good men and women go down. You get a small promotion.

    Then you get sucked into the workload, dumping your calls at 7 minutes, 'cause hey, you have an average call time to maintain. Fuck being helpfull, if granny's PC is taking too long to boot or you thought you'd try to blindly import her mail from Eudora or Caldera on an OS7 Mac, tough shit. She gets the dreaded call transfer.

    By trying out some of our special offers, she can get a month of free service. No really, it is a good deal. The trust that we've maintained over the last 6 minutes is a great thing to shatter with that "please hold." Hopefully she'll hang on the line just long enough that she'll be the 10th tel-save today, lest your boss compare your marketing transfer scores to the woman with the honey-sweet voice a few cubes down.

    Screw women, this is where you become a man. A hardened, overtly-bitter and disgruntled man. You also hone your skills in down pat. Everything can be done with your eyes closed "sleeping" at your desk, or shooting nerf balls at the hottie down the row. Don't worry, she'll never know it was you. The security guy at the front desk might, though.

    It only takes a few months to hate all people and computers. But at 17-24 years of age it will look damn fine on your resume. Future employers will go "wow, AOL, huh?! How'd you like that?"

    And like Michael Bolton, you'll tell them it was great. And you can't really pick out your favorite moment.

    As for people over the age of 30 wearing birkenstocks or tie-dyed shirts, please don't. It's just sad. We know you like your Mac. It says so right on your shirt. And no, you're not really "the" mac daddy. But nice try.

    Anyways, you needed a goot boot in the pants to get you into a "real" tech job. Because by now, you realise that AOL isn't. So mourn for a few days, then get your ass in gear. You've got Interviews.

    --
    Most folk'll never lose a toe, and then again some folk'll...
  109. Re:Don't get too comfortable... by calibanDNS · · Score: 1

    If you stay an IT, you're probably going to get exposed to the GCCS-M 4.x world sooner than the rest of the sailors. It's slated to replace the GCCS-M 3.x systems (the HP-UX machines) over the next decade. The setup is Sun V240s running Solaris 8 as the servers and Windows 2000 boxes as the clients. Hate to have had to be the one to break it to you...

  110. Blue collar holler by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just heard on NPR that there is a "shortage" of blue collar jobs. It seems right now there is a glut of education in this country, possibly due to offshoring. Maybe its time to stuff our degrees away for a while until the next boom hits.

  111. Hopefully they will all be homeless by gelfling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ahhh Christmas in George Bush's America. I can practically smell the trashcan fires burning.

    1. Re:Hopefully they will all be homeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, because if John Kerry was president, AOL would not have laid off a lot of their workers. Oh wait, they stil would have because this has nothing to do with the election

  112. AOL Hurting Itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps part of the problem is the growing following for the open source Firefox browser(which is owned by AOL). Maybe people finally decided to dump AOL when a good alternative to IE came around. :-)

  113. Oh no by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    Now we'll be receiving a dozen CDs a day in the mail ... each with the resume of a laid-off AOL employee!

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  114. That's news, yankdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but good riddance anyway

  115. Re:If they gov't jobs.. by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

    Yup - more than a year. A lot more than a year...

  116. The WARN Act by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having been through a "massive layoff" in the bubble-burst days, one nice thing was that there exists the WARN act which dictates that if a company of at least certain size (which I'm sure Time Warner is) is laying off more than 50 people in one metropolitan area, they are obligated to give 2 months notice. For us this turned out to be two additional months to the severance, since the management doesn't really want you to show up at the office once you've been given your notice.

    Overall this is bad news, since this area (VA/DC/MD) has now pretty much two kinds of techies - those who have clearance, and those who are unemployed, and the AOL layoffs sure do not help.

    1. Re:The WARN Act by benzapp · · Score: 1

      I am curious, no one wants to hire people without clearance?

      So, how then does someone gain this clearance?

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:The WARN Act by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      If you're really curious, you get clearance from the military. Once in a great while the government might hire you without clearance to get it for you; but that's not likely, as it can take up to a year to get clearance and that's a year of not being able to even be in the same building as the job that you were hired for.

      And thanks to Bush, lots of jobs in the area are going to contractors, who love to hire folks with clearance, but can't get you it, ever. So there it is. If you're cleared, you can work anywhere you want in the DC/MD/VA area, even in a field largely outside your expertise. If you're not, well.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    3. Re:The WARN Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am curious, no one wants to hire people without clearance?

      It's not like they don't want to, but rather have no choice - all people working on government contracts require some form of background investigation.

      You get what's called an "interim clearance", which means you can be hired and paid while the investigation takes place.

      The real question is - do you want a clearance? Do you want the government to talk to your relatives, neighbors, former employers, check your tax and medical records, have other personal info on you, etc, etc. A security clearance is a very invasive process, some people (like me) just do not like the idea.

    4. Re:The WARN Act by paitre · · Score: 1

      This isn't -quite- true. If you manage to find an entry level job with a contractor (think PC tech at NARA - BTDT) and manage to stick around and move up the ranks, the odds of them getting you a clearance improve, since it may be necessary for a given promotion, and they may be unable to bring in an "outsider" for the position.
      I know of at least one case where a contractor -has- gone and done the entire process for a TS/Poly for employees being moved to a very specific contract. I have no reason to believe that this is exceedingly rare (uncommon, probably, but not rare as I think of the term).
      If you have the skillset, you -will- get jobs, regardless of clearance status, provided the contractor can put you to use while waiting on the clearance process. IF they can't - then yeah, yer hosed :)

      That all said - the federal government ain't the only place to get work in the greater Washington/Baltimore area. There's a hell of a lot of colleges and universities in the area, and the larger ones are -always- hiring (UMD, JHU, AU, WM, Georgetown, the list goes on and on and on).

      And the pay is decent, too.

    5. Re:The WARN Act by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Several of my friends went right to work for Raytheon out of undergrad this past summer and they all had their clearance within a few months of working there. It costs about $50,000 on the part of the company, so if you're worth the investment to them, they'll go for it.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:The WARN Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's clear up a misconception here. The company does NOT pay for the clearance unless they want to expedite the process (which is rare). The government pays the freight for clearances. However, the company WILL have to eat the expenses of parking you for 6 to 24 months while they wait for the vetting process to (hopefully) successfully complete if they don't have real work for you.

    7. Re:The WARN Act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS. The company pays the government for the clearance in almost every case.

  117. Ever meet an unemployed plumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All you need to know are two things:

    Payday is Thursday

    Shit flows downhill.

  118. Not to disappoint, Colgate laysoff 4,400 by Milo77 · · Score: 1

    Since 950 wasn't enough for you, Colgate-Palmolive Co. announced today they would layoff 4,400 from their 78 plants around the world.

    1. Re:Not to disappoint, Colgate laysoff 4,400 by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Cingular Wireless is reportedly preparing to lay off about 10% of its 68,000.

      How many employees does AOL have? What % is 950?

      My company is giving out packages looking to reduce management by 20% (some 250 heads). I'm sure my company is nowhere near the size of AOL.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  119. I hope they get another job soon by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean to joke at such a serious matter. I find its hard finding jobs. Its the sort of market that almost makes you want to start your own buisness.

    1. Re:I hope they get another job soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keep in mind almost 90 percent of new small businesses fail within the first 2 years

  120. Shoutcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this the Shoutcast that I enjoy, at http://shoutcast.com/
    I just connected to them, and I see the AOL ad at the top of the site.
    Surely Shoutcast won't go down, will it? I love the
    thing!

  121. AOL still trying to sell dial up! BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So 1990's! What's wrong with those idiots?

  122. The Third Class is really: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that she's not likely to make a fuss if the boss hits on her.

    My SO was in that position when she first moved here and was terrified that she'd be fired and deported (that's what she was told anyway).... Luckily, she found better work elsewhere.

  123. Expectations of a McJob-SOHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have you tried here?

  124. Don't blame the economy-Just Stupidity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe. Now this is funny. Hey everyone! Crowd around. I want to show you what happens when you use a knee jerk argument. In this case everyone's pet "Obsolete business model". Telemonster just put an iceberg directly in front of SomeOtherGuy's Titanic argument. Will there be any survivers? Will future Slashdotters look back, and say "By the grace of God, that could have been me.".

    Here's the moral of the OP's post. Not every failure is directly attributable to an "obsolete business model". Sometime just plain stupidity will do nicely, and that's something humanity will have far into it's future. Up and happinin or obsolete models alike.

  125. sorry, that was me.. by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    When any one of their customers has a suggestion for how to make the internet better, they listen. I said "Make massive cut-backs to your staff".

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  126. No McJob for me. by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    I was writing software for other people using Apple ][ systems in highschool and have gone on to create large software projects that are still running today at some companies that most US ./ readers would recognize. After getting laid off about the middle of 2002, I couldn't even get a McJob from a friend that managed a McDonalds. They had already hired some desperate techies that wanted to get paid without working.

    Now I am halfway through HVAC certifications and am making more than before being laid off. I'm also going back to school to eventually get an MBA because US companies aren't going to outsource the executive managment positions...

    My message to the IT departments: Good Riddance. No more 70-80 hour weeks working toward near impossible deadlines to fatten your bonuses.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:No McJob for me. by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "because US companies aren't going to outsource the executive managment positions..."

      Hah! That's what we all said about tech jobs 10 years ago.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:No McJob for me. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      I'm also going back to school to eventually get an MBA because US companies aren't going to outsource the executive managment positions...

      Another one lost to the dark side.

    3. Re:No McJob for me. by pyota · · Score: 1

      well life for this techie hasn't been too bad. but before you drop a zillion bucks on that mba i recommend giving this article about increasing mba applicants rising inversely proportional to mba job offers a read.

    4. Re:No McJob for me. by mpspence · · Score: 1

      Google for "too many mbas".

  127. I work there, and not laid off - (yet) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work there, I'm not laid off, yet bring the keyword. As USA jobs leave, India's enter. :(

  128. Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by blitz487 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Did you want AOL to provide "make work" employment for these people?

    Better than throwing them into the street after mortgages were signed.

    Hey, AOL didn't sign your mortgage papers. You did. Why is AOL on the hook for what you irresponsibly did?

    1. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Why is AOL on the hook for what you irresponsibly did?

      Because the BANK wanted to see the PAYCHECK from AOL as proof they could make the PAYMENTS.

      So the employee gets fired and...

      AOL saves money
      The bank gets the house
      The employee gets SHIT

      That's called unfair. The employee did nothing except show up and do a good job.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    2. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by blitz487 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is AOL on the hook for what you irresponsibly did?

      Because the BANK wanted to see the PAYCHECK from AOL as proof they could make the PAYMENTS.

      That's between you and the bank, AOL had nothing to do with it. When you get a mortgage, you also must sign a piece of paper saying you read all the documents and understand them. There's nothing in those documents that says that AOL is responsible for the mortgage. YOU are.

      So the employee gets fired and... AOL saves money The bank gets the house The employee gets SHIT That's called unfair.

      Nobody failed to live up to their agreements, except the employee. Why is that unfair to the employee? What would be unfair is AOL being forced to pick up the slack for an employee's irresponsibility.

      The employee did nothing except show up and do a good job.

      The employee should try reading and comprehending the contracts he signs. This wasn't a case of fine print or trickery. When you buy a mortgage, most financial advisors recommend that you save up at least 6 months of expenses first. That way, you can survive temporary interruptions in your income, or at least it will give you time to sell the house properly. At the very least, such minimal prudence won't leave you in a bad bargaining position. If you can't do that, don't buy a mortgage.

    3. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Notice everyone in this example has a mechanism to recover their loss except the employee? AOL replaces the employee, probably at a lower salary. The bank gets the house.

      This is why W-4 employment is unfair. It's a ripoff for the employee. Employees are expected to depend on their paycheck for food, mortgage payments, etc. But they can't really depend on their paycheck, because the company can fire them any time they feel like it.

      A business would never make such an agreement. AOL would never accept significant revenue in installments from another company without an enforceable contract, but that is exactly what they expect their employees to do.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    4. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by blitz487 · · Score: 1

      Businesses make such agreements all the time - they have no choice. They cannot force you to work for them or to continue to work for them. You can quit at any time for any reason. Furthermore, AOL's customers can quit at any time too. Nobody can force you to continue to subscribe to AOL. AOL doesn't have guaranteed revenue. And if they go bankrupt, the same thing happens to them that happens to you if you go bankrupt.

    5. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by chrisbw · · Score: 1
      So the employee gets fired and...
      AOL saves money
      The bank gets the house
      The employee gets SHIT
      That's called unfair. The employee did nothing except show up and do a good job.

      I call bullshit on that... it's not AOL's fault or the bank's fault if your house gets repo'ed. It's YOUR fault. If you're responsible, you shouldn't be entering into a mortgage unless you have the cash reserves to be able to survive a job change without having your house foreclosed. You should be able to survive for enough time until you are able to sell the house.

      --
      Chris -- http://www.bitter.net/
    6. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that AOL thinks it's a good idea to have more than a few days operating capital on hand, unlike our hypothetical "employee".

    7. Re:Did AOL sign those mortgage papers too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh! Now I see. Because AOL made the mistake of hiring this whiner, who then (without their permission, or any agreement by them) showed his paycheck to AOL, they are now bound for the life of the mortgage. Interesting.

      Get real. Base your financial commitments on reality, not this fantasy world.

  129. Who's left? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Urr, I'm confused. Does this mean that only old Korean AOL techs are getting fired, or only old Korean AOL techs are keeping their jobs?

  130. This is what I think it means by edbarbar · · Score: 1


    Jobs such as construction, defense, service, and agriculture (for defense reasons) will stay in the US. I think that we as taxpayers have a huge burden to pull around from the crazy spending that Ronald Reagan accelerated, along with a high regulatory tax on everything we produce, so there is little chance of making our wages competitive with India and China. I think that those with the money will invest heavily in the emerging technologically elite countries: China, India, and Israel and Russia if they becomes stable in every new technology that comes about. Opportunity is lost in the United states. It eventually loses its military edge as commercial enterprises in India and China propell their technology and their own institutions of learning and research supercede the US's technology for key militarily applications. They build their own advanced military. Japan rebuilds its military as it can no longer rely on the United States. The United States, like Spain at it's height becomes weak as it actually produces nothing of value. The new techno elite countries nationalize their US businesses, or structure things in such a way that they eventually die. They use their strong governments to bring a new order to the world, based on weakened human rights and pre-eminant power of the state.

    Meanwhile, internally the Democrats cheer they have an issue left. They take up the banner of protectionism in a contradiction of the humanism they espouse that is written in the history books. They embrace so called tech-libertarians, and get caught in a tempest of self contradiction that keeps them innefective against the massive market forces at play.

    The US becomes an economic backwater, much the same as modern day Spain. The people that brought us to this place have collected significant portions of the value of the US, so they implement a social structure much the same as is in England, with elites and servants. The republican party pushes theocracy to keep the disgruntled workers in line.

    Given the forces at work today, it's hard to see how the US maintains its leadership position.

    --
    Ed Barbar, President and General Manager, Furnit USA
  131. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a clearance straight out of graduate school. I've never been in the military. I've recently had that upgraded to a higher level when I switched to another defense contractor that hired me away from my old one.

  132. On the bright side of life by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    they'll have plenty of free time to spend the holidays with their family.

    And with full pay for a number of months they get all the perks of having a job without the job.

  133. Quit blaming outsourcing on the US gov't by tjstork · · Score: 0, Troll

    Outsourcing is not the government's fault, it's ours. I mean, how many of you drive a Japanese or German car and thought, jeez, all those -millions- of American workers will adjust to the new economy. Now the new economy has hit us, and you fools are still blaming the government while still looking for more foreign made junk to buy. When will you get it that buying a foreign product is probably worse for the country than any so-called act of terrorism? Do you want to end outsourcing, then stop buying foreign products. We need to get it into our collective heads that foreign countries do not want equitable trade with the USA, they are all our economic enemies and want us to be destroyed so they can take our place. Buying a Chinese product, giving money to Bin Laden, there's no difference.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Quit blaming outsourcing on the US gov't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive a Mustang Cobra... I've never been laid off.

      Karma?

    2. Re:Quit blaming outsourcing on the US gov't by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is the fault of the consumer that outsourcing has gone as far as it has. I agree that we are getting screwed by our trade agreements with China.

      But you are generally incorrect regarding trade. International trade builds alliances based on common dependence. When the trade is favorable to both nations, both nations benefit and are more likely to become political allies. Your statement that other countries are our economic enemies out to destroy us is not true either. They do want to take our place at the top of the economic food chain, but to destroy us is to lose a big customer and they do not want that. I love the way we in the U.S. clamor about how "those people" are taking our jobs and economic position when the U.S. has a long history of raping third world countries of their resources for selfish economic gain.

    3. Re:Quit blaming outsourcing on the US gov't by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Bollocks.

      If it wasn't for outsourcing to places of lower labour costs (or no labour costs at all when machines take over from men), we'd probably all still be subsistence farmers. It's just a question of moving with the times. There'll always be somebody who's willing and qualified to do a job for less than the man who's doing it at the minute, whether it's in the same town/state/country or a different one. And there'll always be an employer who'll take him on to save costs.

      So where does that leave the guy who's just been priced out of the market? Well, he can sit around and moan about all the jobs being shipped out. Or he can get up and do something to differentiate himself from the people competing for his job. Get more qualifications, go somewhere where his skills are in greater demand, whatever.

      It's just a fact of life that the demands of the labour market are going to change over time. What was a well-paid, secure job eventually becomes cheap labour. If you don't want to get carried downstream, you've got to swim against the tide and develop the skills which are in demand by the market. Short-term, there'll always be losers, but overall everyone benefits in the end.

      If you start throwing up barriers, you end up isolated and backward and eventually the whole thing collapses in on you.

  134. Imagine how they told them... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    ...by email. You've Got...No Job!

    The problem is, the employees kept getting cut off and had to keep redialing.

  135. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irony.

    illiterate most of America (nay, the world) really is. Not computer illiterate, the plain' old fashion kind.

    Ok.... how long did it take you to "realise" that?

  136. IT'S THAT GREAT ECONOMY! HEIL!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope 50% of us are still employed by Spring - assuming there hasn't been a Divine Apocalyptic war - in which case Winter will be extended a bit further.

  137. Cost of CDs by pagal_paanda · · Score: 0

    I have always wondered how much would it have cost AOL to ship those millions of CDs? And what kind of Return on Investments did they get from spending all that money. Certainly if you're looking to produce those CDs in quantities, they would have cost close to $1 a piece (including expense of shipping and CD spaming). So that would bring the price in hundreds of millions of Dollars.

    1. Re:Cost of CDs by pagal_paanda · · Score: 0

      Still no replies, or mod points. Snif snif

  138. Hey, I *am* a mormon by lamber45 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...and I still didn't get a security clearance!

    About a year ago, I was talking with a US Army recruiter about enlisting in the US Army. I got as far as MEPS. I passed the ASVAB and the physical, but they denied me enlistment after the security interview, which started out as a 10-page written questionnaire.

    I answered "yes" to several questions that they wanted me to answer "no" to, but there were two that especially seemed to require a lot of "further clarification":

    1. On the last page, just before a long affirmation about "this knowledge is true to the best of my knowledge and belief...", etc., etc., there was a question about like "Have you ever [...] misused [...] an information-technology resource?" I said "yes", and mentioned something that hadn't made my teachers happy during high school, about nine years before; I later found out that the high-school's disciplinary records have been destroyed from that time. However, if you think about it, downloading an illegal copy of a popular song off KaZaa is a forbidden use of an information-technology resource; I suspect the majority of the kids who did that stuff in Abu Ghraib had been regular KaZaa users...
    2. The other thing was that I had visited a professional counsellor or therapist several times, all within a year or two, plus or minus, of the computer-related incident. They decided to totally misread the examining doctor's statement for something that was not in the record, and disqualify me as medically unfit by reason of depression (apparently). Of course, perhaps a college graduate who wants to join the Army is crazy. It may be that anyone who wants to join the Army has a little something wrong with them...
    Just to answer certain questions in advance: Yes, I observe the Word of Wisdom (sorry about the JavaScript-wrapped text); drug use has always been a complete non-issue. No, I do not beat my wife. That's right, I did not go to BYU; I went to MSU instead, and they do not have an honor code that requires clean-shavenness. I know the Army has a dress code, and I told the recruiter that I would be perfectly willing to abide by it once enlisted; I had obeyed a similar dress code for two years as a missionary. Yes, I should probably be doing something else besides responding in detail to five-hour-old Slashdot postings
  139. The Bill of No Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was time to trot this out. I reference it at snopes because the history is interesting, but I'm mentioning it for the content of the "bill" itself.

  140. Re:If they gov't jobs.. by quarkscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right!

    VA Gov. John Warner was the one making the
    big announcement. The jobs are with DHS,
    and will require TS or better security
    clearances. If you are exiting the military
    with a TS clearance, are in IT, and have an
    MSCE (DHS is MS OS-centric), then NoVA is
    the place for you.
    I seriously doubt that the ex-AOL staffers that
    just got RIFfed would be likely to have that
    particular "skill set".

    It is my understanding that a TS security
    clearance might take 18 - 24 months these
    days, particularly if it's Poly/LifeStyle.
    Generally, it is the employer (read here
    government contractor) that picks up the
    cost for the background investigation --
    often as much as $50K USD. That contractor
    has got to want you pretty bad to put you
    on the payroll for that period of time, and
    incur that expense, without having you doing
    the work their contracted for. I believe
    that that is why I have seen the exact same
    job postings on "WPost.com" for the past
    1 to 1-1/2 years. If you have the security
    clearance, then everyone is knocking on your
    door. But if you don't have one, you are SOL.
    What it really works out to is a Catch-22
    Scenario. And when the employers advertise
    for a "transferable" security clearance, I
    think they are blowing smoke -- the clearance
    is for a specific employer and specific function.

  141. being fired sucks... by torrents · · Score: 1

    ...but will they at least get to keep their @aol.com email addresses... most of the people who have the service only keep it for the address...

    --
    Get your torrents...
  142. Didn't N. Virginia vote for Bush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I'm sure the solution is easy for them then - join the Army!

    1. Re:Didn't N. Virginia vote for Bush? by greenmars · · Score: 1

      No, Northern Virginia consistently votes Democrat. That's why they called it "Occupied Virginia." Lots of Yankees.

    2. Re:Didn't N. Virginia vote for Bush? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1

      If you look at this map from CNN.com, it seems that virtually every county in Virginia voted for Bush in the 2004 election.

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    3. Re:Didn't N. Virginia vote for Bush? by greenmars · · Score: 1

      Right. Virginia is a Red state, but northern Virginia, the richest part, consistently votes Democrat. See Arlington, Fairfax counties.

  143. I got fired from every job I've had by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...what's the big deal?

  144. Ok-GWB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fox News or not, the economy is kicking ass. Knock it off with the tunnel vision. Just because you're unemployed doesn't mean that everyone else is."

    George Bush? Is that you?

  145. Satirewire article by jebiester · · Score: 1

    For some reason, whenever I read about massive layoffs, it reminds me of this article .

  146. Severance packages? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to add, I worked on the AOL HelpDesk in Jacksonville, FL. Our entire dept. (ok, 22 people or so) was outsourced to a company in TN named SAIC.
    We were given a 1-2 month notice window, and let go in August. We were offered absolutely nothing in terms of a severance package.
    They did, however, offer to relocate us to the billing dept. -- A pay cut from $14.50/hr, to $8.00/hr., and to a dept. that expects you to upsell products to all of your callers. I doubt anyone took up that offer.

    As far as finding a new job? Hah. I'm still looking, but I did move from Jacksonville to Columbus, OH; where the job market is far worse.

  147. Actually, I'm not.. . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    . . . Nope, no MCSE, just an ancient NT 4.0 MCP, with background in Windoze, Unix, and Linux. Some Cisco experience. Quite a bit of security experience, especially firewalls. And yes, a security clearance, but only a SECRET. But I ALSO do documentation, have experience in structured CMMI-compliant engineering processes, and can translate techspeak to management.

    In other words, I'm NOT a one-trick pony. I style myself a "Network and Systems Admin", NOT a Unix admin or a Windoze admin. Flexibility is the key word here: pick up new skills as you go along, blend them in to the portfolio. And, unlike a lot of people, it wasn't "below me" to work for Club Fed during the go-go Dotcom days.

  148. And they already don't know what 'cancel' means by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    And they already do not know the meaning of cancel. (AOL is well know for continuing to bill for months and months after you 'cancell', though they'll actually get your actuall connection turned off most of the time)

    Clark Howard (nationaly syndicated radio host who does the whole save money, don't get riped off, consumer rights, kinda thing) Has even put up a 'fire AOL page' on his website(www.clarkhoward.com iirc) to help people with cancelling AOL.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  149. There's always work in the tobacco fields by Ingolfke · · Score: 1

    The subject says it all... so laugh a little... chuckle internally at least... and get back to work.

    1. Re:There's always work in the tobacco fields by gaylenek · · Score: 1

      I thought that job got shipped to India...like just about every other ship-able job, skilled and non-skilled.

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.
  150. Re:Don't get too comfortable... by SpookyJim · · Score: 1
    I hold the NEC 2720, for GCCS-M Admin, and cross-rating to CTN isn't open to anyone other than CTs yet. So, if it comes out within the next year or two, I'm sure I'll have first hand experience, especially since I'm going back to Bahrain on shore.

    You'd think for something as expensive and crucial as an UMA, they'd run something proprietary. I never understood the logic of how using everyone elses software/equipment was cost-effective for the Navy.

  151. Is it really funny? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    As of the time I am reading this thread all of the score 5 postings are jokes about the AOL layoffs.

    Being a programmer my reactions was "there but for the grace of whatever go I". Especially since I live in the DC Metro area.

  152. In the DC area... by Jaeph · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clearances don't simply help, they're everything. I'm another one layed off in the post 2000 bust, and if I had a clearance there wouldn't have been a problem. I got lucky in that a friend knew someone who was looking (it's not what you know, it's who you know), because otherwise my pizza delivery skillz would have been tested.

    You need a clearance, and you can't get one.

    -Jeff

    --
    Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
  153. Funny...saw this yesterday by Danathar · · Score: 1

    What is up with these dorks?

    Send jobs to India. Ads all over your service. Odd billing. Creators of Gnutella. Destroyers of WinAmp. Creators of NSIS. Nightmare employees on the phone (they sound really scared).

    And landfills full of coasters (CDs). Oh and the mother of all Crappy mergers for WB but the best for AOL.

    They are all over the map. Do the people who run it know anything except how to sell dialup to new computer users? Everything else they touch turns to poo.

  154. 750 lost - 10,000 gained? by Steampunk · · Score: 1

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A556 55-2004Nov16.html

    750 lost in one month, versus 10,000 gained over 5 years? I'll buy that for a dollar.

    And this doesn't include the 1,250 jobs IBM just opened up in the FairLakes area of Fairfax.

  155. Yes, the american dream...to be poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got an idea. How about everyone at AOL just kill there boss. That should lower the overhead. As we all know bosses are just a bunch of jack A's that couldn't find their A's with both hands tied behind themselves.
    And lets not forget the CxO. The do nothing, such profits, schmooze, slime balls that are doing the firing. Let's fire back....I think a 357Mag should do the trick...but line them up so you don't have to waste more than 1 bullet.

    I love all the posts of how we live beyond our means....and what about the CxO...why should they get to live high on the hog, for sitting on the fat a's, getting drunk in their posh office, banging the securtary, and not doing a GD thing?!

    REVOLT!! REVOLUTION!!! The only way to corporate Evolution.

  156. Dumb and Dumber... by qadmon · · Score: 1

    Have to categorize the GenXSlacker crowd with that appellation. Having been someone with a functional brain calling the AOL support means that you may have to revert to chiseling the message on stone and mailing it to them, since it mostly the GenXSlacker crowd they hire.

    Once upon a time in this country people had REAL tech jobs. Somehow millons of our youth lost the ability to functionally communicate and think.

    Something about walking around with a Gameboy in your hands all day long and zoning out in classes.

    I really wouldn't like to be working in HR these days.

  157. The inevitable government layoffs by GoldenBB · · Score: 1

    Speaking of massive layoffs and the employment situation in NoVa, how long do you folks think that the government feeding frenzy is going to last? Not every techie can become an employee or contractor of the US Government, but that seems to be what we are trying to do here in this country.

    All we're doing is forestalling a tragedy of biblical proportions. When the fed.gov employment bubble finally bursts, there will be an all new meaning to the words 'ye reap what ye sow.' Security clearnances be damned! The military/industrial complex cannot expand much furuther than it already has in our Sparta-esque militarized state known as the USA.

    Enjoy it while it lasts though. I'm guessing we have fewer than ten years left until total meltdown. State governments will follow right along--all their expansion money is coming from the feds, too.

  158. Job Opportunities? by pragma_x · · Score: 1

    This whole thing brings to mind that AOL commercial with hordes of people outside the office... only this time, it's these folks asking for their jobs back.

    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?

    Not to be too cynical, but take it from this native of Northern Virginia:

    It's "slim pickin's" around here for anyone without a security clearance of some kind. This goes especially for anyone who relocated to the West-end of the Dulles Corridor (all the job ops are East of you, so look forward to a hellish commute). I wish everyone affected by this disaster the best of luck.

  159. maybe with the reduced staff by harryoyster · · Score: 1

    Maybe with the reduced staff they could reduce thier support time and costs by simply opening up the service to more normal internet services. Having a simple opt-in rather than a shit service would be better.

    --
    Got a question about UNIX ask it here : Unix/xBSD Forum
  160. Job Prospects in Northern VA by lorcha · · Score: 1
    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?"
    I had a contract end suddenly last month. I had a new contract within 3 weeks.

    The kicker? I wasn't even looking. I just wanted to take some time off and relax. But the job market here is so hot I got an offer I couldn't refuse within 3 weeks.

    So, yeah, those AOLers are fine. The dirty little secret in the DC area is that the job market is smokin' hot if you're decent. Put another way, if you are looking for an IT job in DC for more than 3 months, you need to find a new career because if you aren't snatched up here, you won't find a job anywhere.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  161. India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, they can find new jobs in Asia! Woohoo!

  162. AOL only has DIAL-UP! by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 1

    "In its third quarter, AOL lost 646,000 subscribers, most of whom were dial-up customers." huh?? what do you mean most of whom were dial-up? they only have dial-up. they dont offer broadband, as they would like all the newbies to think. they just have their fancy dancy crappy bloated interface to interact with your already broadband connection

    1. Re:AOL only has DIAL-UP! by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's wrong.

      AOL has "Bring your own access" customers that access AOL's "content" through another ISP (including broadband). They also have "AOL Broadband" customers that are basically joint marketing deals bundling AOL "content" with DSL. AOL calls those subscribers, even if they don't meet your narrow definition. (BTW, AOL just announced they are walking away from DSL customers in BellSouth states, and will soon do so in the rest of the country)

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  163. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's funny, if you substitute "AOL" with "Northwest Airlines" I had nearly the same experience in college myself.


    Your statement is true of ALL call centers.

  164. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Substitute AOL with Digital River, and I did that from 1998-2000.

  165. New Jobs for ex-AOL staff by Gorbag · · Score: 1
    With most of the layoffs coming from the Northern Virginia offices, what are their hopes for finding new jobs?
    That depends. Can they speak Chinese?
    --
    -- I speak only for myself
  166. There are companies looking in NoVa... by mikefocke · · Score: 1


    The newspapers have nothing, it is all online or word of mouth.

    My group is looking for about 10 UNIX programmer types. Actually finding it hard to find good ones even though no security clearance required for some positions, just US Citizenship. Applications and OS programmers.

    Part of that I attribute to the holidays, no one looks around this time.

    After New Years then people start looking again.

    1. Re:There are companies looking in NoVa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad you aren't looking in the Austin, TX area (BAE has an office here).

  167. Hmm, This may have something to do with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a bus yesterday with a AOL - "Write you're own paycheck" hiring ad on it, I guess the new guys are REALLY writing thier own paychecks, (it does make me wonder why they are paying for HR ads when they are laying other people off.

  168. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thought of a career in writing? I like your style.

  169. Re:Revenue -- STILL an order of magnitude off... by lax-goalie · · Score: 1

    you obviously have no idea how small 400 million dollars is in hte scheme of things at Time Warner. Most people in that company feel AOL is a lag on business, not some cash cow to be milked. That 400 million dollars you are riving about doesn't even hit 1% of total revenue to Time Warner. They bring in over 41 billion dollars a year in revenue (http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=TWX).

    ANOTHER math error. You're comparing AOL's monthly subscriber revenue to TW's yearly revenue. Multiply 400 mil by 12, and you end up with 4.8 billion a year, or over 10% of the whole TWX pie. And that's not counting AOL's ad revenues.

    Before you try to say anything about money or the financials of a major corporation, try to do a tiny bit of research so you don't sound quite so ignorant. It took me a total of 2 minute to look this stuff up.

    Before you start with the ad hominem attacks, try making a little sense out of the data you googled. I've been following the company for years, and know more than a few people who work there. A really big problem is that a lot of the cash is going out of Dulles and up to NY -- a year ago, the TWX CFO said that one of their goals was to "reposition Time Life so that it's no longer a drag on this division's financial performance."

    Compare that to what he said about AOL: "This revenue is very high margin and so $1 of revenue translates into an extraordinarily, unusually high level of impact on earnings." In other words, AOL is a cash cow.

    The yahoo link you posted shows an EBITDA of $6.76B. AOL's revenue of over $5B had an admitted " extraordinarily...high level of impact on earnings." What do you make of that?

  170. Re:Hey, I *am* a mormon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Use of [...] hot drinks proscribed

    Does that include a cup of soup?

    Just a curious European.

  171. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also worked for AOL and this is by all accounts the most acurate description of AOL Tech support in so many words. I've also sent it to other ex AOL employees, the concur.

  172. Yeah you are right by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I was stressing out when I wrote it. My wife is pregnant and it's budget time. If I was 22 and single, I would be less apprehensive about it. For me, for us, I think the equation is, to be on the side producing software for sale rather than being on the corporate consuming side. Corporate contracts are going to go to the lowest bidder, but, given that corporations always prefer to buy rather than make, even a slightly pricier niche product that already exists will be competitive with a custom solution with outsourced labor simply because it doesn't have the risks involved in project startup. So the future is in vertical market, integrated solutions. End to end stuff or things that can readily bolt onto an endpoint.

    --
    This is my sig.
  173. Great non answer by gelfling · · Score: 1

    "My guy isn't actually a cannibal yet, I hate lib-r-als, mwah mwah mwah I'm a victim they're picking on me again, mommy!!".

  174. Hahahah. Totally missed the point! by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Yer funny. Grandparent's point is that Great-Grandparent referenced the wrong form. Great Grandparent meant W-2, not W-4, which is a different form entirely. So grandparent made a tonge-in-cheek comment pointing out the error, and you are just totally clueless.

    Thanks for the laugh at your expense. I needed that today. Hopefully you get yourself a nice W-4 next month while the rest of us are getting our W-2s! Hahahahahahah.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  175. Re:Good, this will improve the lives of many emplo by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

    Sure this is absolutely accurate.

    My gut says this kid didn't work in Jacksonville though, since we called all of them (regardless of promotion) "smart-transfers" (and not just tel-save). That kinda dates you a little too, since they later moved to a 'smart-transfer' system that was integrated into Merlin. It sounds like you weren't around to see that. ;) Pretty good description of a Mac tech too ... though I was one, I don't fit the generic description.

    Anyhow, glad we both got out. Sadly, as bad as that job was, I haven't found a job that's better yet :-\

    I did learn to juggle, though.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  176. Re:Hahahah. Totally missed the point! by tabrisnet · · Score: 1

    Well, dang. I had a parenthetical in there "(I always called it W-2 employment)", but removed it as I had thought it irrelevant and maybe I was wrong. so much for that.

  177. AO-Hell by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    AO-hell as we called at the call center in OKC .

    The average call time requirement started out at like 9:12
    Then it went to 8:30 , then to 8:00, then to 7:00 .

    I did my stint starting in May of 1998 and because I was an old
    sk00l PC technician, and electronics technician, and full time
    I was asked to be a "Mentor". When I found out it would negatively
    impact my statisitics I said " can I get execeptions enetered ? "

    I was told no . So I answered no to the mentor status request .

    This made them angry, and I simply told them I will not sacrifice my
    stats and work harder than anyone else on my team and help AO-hell
    train them when it offers no difference in pay than the ppl I am
    training, and I get penalized performance wise because I am off
    the phone for 37 seconds of " IDLE " to help some tech illiterate
    they have hired because she is "so and so's" girlie friend .

    Right before I quit and left AO-hell to go do networking and
    telecommunications I was asked to help cover in RST .

    RST was representative support technicians, we helped the techs
    when they could not figure it out themselves .

    I worked in this capacity for a few months, and then the test
    came up for ppl to get promoted to RST which I had been working
    at about 50% of my time on the phones .

    I was not allowed to even take the test because they knew I'd
    nail the damn thing . They picked by popularity contest and
    hired 2 cutzie ditz heads , and a Mr. popular man around campus type.

    They asked me the next day to go work in RST after this affront and
    help "UPTRAIN" the fucktards they just hired over me, and around me.

    I told them I am not paid at that scale, and I no longer wish to work
    in that capactiy , and will return to my normal duties .

    They started hammering me over not getting enough trasnfer for
    free gasoline cards after helping ppl out on the phone and my stats
    were otherwise immaculate .

    I walked over to my coach and asked "Hey, you know the way to the
    door ??? " She said " yeah ...." looking apprehensive , and I said
    " Walk me out, I am done with this place. "

    And thus my coach Angela walked me out and I left AO-hell for good .

    Before I quit though, I sent out the obiligatory e-mail that
    started with saying to forgot about me and my personal whining .

    Take a serious look at the nepotism, the illiterate techs, the
    customer is SUPPOSE to come first, and how they were alienating
    their technical staff by paying their "SAVES" ppl about double
    at that time what the techs made . Further alientating the tech
    staff by not rewarding good techs for good work .

    Techs that had a "HIGH" fix rate were specifically targetted
    for "HOT TRANSFERS" by saves ppl to help save customers about to
    drop the service, and I was one of these ppl . It did not matter
    a hill of beans when it came to promotion or pay .

    This short novel is why I quit, and why I think AO-hell hopelessly
    sucks so bad I can't stand them, and I go out of my way to tell my
    friends, family, and clients of the business I run now .

    AO-hell, To boldly suck like nothing has ever sucked before .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  178. Crisco ( cisco ) 8,500 canned ppl by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    True True, when I got canned at Crisco ( cisco ) there was
    8,500 full time, and no idea the temps and contractors that
    got canned .

    It was a 60+ million dollar Voice over Ip lab where we designed
    and built a universal protocol convertor for SS7 .

    AKA international VOIP gateway SS7 protocol convertor .

    It was so bad at the office I worked at in Herndon Virginia
    that state law required them either give us 6 months notice or
    give us 6 months severance . Because they canned over 50%
    of the staff at that location, mostly software coders, and
    test engineers .

    I was a lab support engineer, its funny they kept the psycho
    in drug rehab and canned their best lab supprt guy Tim Murphy .

    We called him McGuyver because he could wire power live to anything,
    and do anything "except" work on computers .

    He was hard core telecom, and should have been kept .

    I knew SS7 moderately well, and supported the Inet Spectra
    black boxes which did clear text decode of T1 and T3 trunks,
    and I used to work at Inet in dallas .

    I could almost see why they canned me and my good friend who
    is now Sr. Open GL coder at NSSL in Norman OK, but Tim Murphy
    was prolly their best support engineer .

    It was all done to liquidate stock options and block vesting
    in 401k plans, Crisco just reclaimed alot of their money .

    They optioned 6 months severance to avoid sabotage, infighting,
    and other uglier possibilities that arise when ppl are kept because
    they have Visa's and the ppl being canned have too many stock
    options and canning them would reacquire them for the company .

    Almost all the marketing pukes kept their jobs, and another office
    they had just bought a few months before in dallas took over
    our project .

    Ppl lost houses, cars, and wives, and kids to divorce .

    It was really hideous, even misty who stayed working there
    cried for days . Ppl had to go get counseling .

    I kinda saw the DOT BOMB coming way back and started
    trying to save and live minimalistically back in 1999 .

    I had alot saved, and because I had a 'clue' I got a job within
    30 days but several states away as a contractor .

    Made more good money, and ratholed it away .

    I miss the awesome lab, the 60+ million in cisco and sun gear,
    but working for Bob Milton on the few days he did show up .

    The stress on Bob at home was so bad, what went on at work was
    enough to to finish him, he died not long after all the layoffs .

    Nah, don't miss that at all .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"