Slashdot Mirror


Walmart Offers Sub-$500 laptop With Linspire

LehiNephi writes "Cnet reports that Walmart is offering a sub-$500 notebook running Linspire. The specs are less-than impressive: a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, 128 MB RAM, 30GB hard drive, and a plain vanilla CD-ROM. Seems overpriced for what you get, but cheap nonetheless. And yes, it does run Linux."

589 comments

  1. Gotta love Walmart... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0, Redundant

    despite its warts..

    Its really bringing linux to the messes

    1. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Akai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WalMart is both the symbol and actualization of what is wrong with the USA. Remeber how much you love WalMart when that's the only job available to you, and the wages from your WalMart job are so low you can only afford to shop at WalMart.

      Warts? They are more like sucking chest wounds.

      Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.

      --
      Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
    2. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by StevenHenderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As South Park so eloquently pointed out... :)

    3. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by yamcha666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems someone has been watching a bit too much South Park.

      *Referring to South Park Episode # 8-09*

    4. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here Here!!! I would love to be party of killing employer paid health care... and government health care... if we did, maybe there would be wal-marts selling insurance and health care.

      Some people have no friggin concept of the economy and capitalism whatsoever. As if the great founders of America implanted a economic system based around freedoms and capitalism... but they had NO IDEA there would be someplace like Wal-Mart!!! I mean... we just can't compete!!!

      Complete ignorance. People like you put us on the fast-track to protectionism and an isolated economy just so we can give the high-school dropout and union job with full benefits and garuanteed pay raises every year. Nevermind the complete loss of any motivation to outperform your peers and better yourself.

    5. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by benna · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm sure you would feel the same way if you actually did have to work at a wallmart. Get over yourself.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    6. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just one of the following:

      Front Line
      Fast Company
      The NY Times

    7. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an episode of Sliders I remember from a few years back...all the people in a city worked for this mall or something, they were "encouraged" through media saturation to open up lines of credit through their employer and subconsciously influenced into buying more than they could afford, thus assuring they were eternally in debt and could not leave(i.e. indentured servants, i.e. slaves)

      --
      Sleep is futile.
    8. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Life is not a competition. That is all.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    9. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by TrailerTrash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agree 100%. The people I went to high school with never went to college, because the union would get them US$40K a year jobs with full benefits right after high school. They scoffed at college.

      Now (25 years later) we are finding that we (the US) have overpriced our labor to the point were we are non-competitive in any basic industries. Now my former classmates are unemployed, or on strike for years at a time, and up a creek. The slightly more enlightened among them are at a community college trying to make up for lost time.

      Wal*Mart charges a low price and pays a low rate. Don't like it, go to school and get a job doing something other than stocking shelves. No other jobs in Podunk other than Wal*Mart? Move.

      Grow up, people. Wal*Mart only controls the job supply if you let it. Train yourself for something other than stocking shelves or waving UPC's over scanners. Especially since we're automating that function, too.

    10. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Hi, you must be new here. Let me be the first to welcome you to planet Earth. Here life most certainly is a competition. Now please check your naivete at the door.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    11. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with you I think there are some key points that you're not addressing adaquatly. Maybe our labor is overpriced but how could it not be without going back to the slave labor of the 1900s? Polution control, safe working enviornment, healthcare; these things are a HUGE cost to companies that can outsorce to areas which have none. And besides that how do you compete with a country where people can live well off of $1 a day? The answer is you can't so it's a lost cause there - not just because of the unions, but because we have an expecation for a decent standard of living.

      Aside from that there will only be so many jobs to hold when your country doesn't actually produce anything. That leaves service jobs, and services alone cannot sustain an economy.

      So while you are right on many accounts, it doesn't change the fact that the U.S. is screwed as a whole. But such is the way of things. Enjoy the good times while they're here.

    12. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must really be young.

      It reminds me of West Virginia coal mines of the 1920's and 30's and their company-owned towns. Your monthly wages never exceeded your monthly costs for rent, food, clothes and your kids 'education' in the company owned and run stores and schools, so you we always in debt to the company.

      People originally flocked to Walmart because the low prices allowed them to keep more of their income from their middle class jobs and spend it on other things besides food and clothes. But, as Walmart drove the middle class jobs out of town, many found that they could no longer afford to shop any place else.

      Now that most of the Walmart merchandise has "Made in China" labels on it, Americans have completed the task of sending their remaining jobs and income overseas and in doing so are funding a Marxist dictatorship bent on our own destruction. America, truly a "company store" again. Add to that the fact we that sending what money we have left to Mid-Eastern Oil producing states so we can drive SUV that get 12 mpg and proof of our insanity is complete.

      Pr0n, booze, drugs and Walmart. What a sad commentary.

    13. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local woman made herself quite rich using Wal-Mart's stock-matching scheme. The stock has split at least three times since she's been doing it.

      Finally, (and this is the last word on Wal-Mart), Wal-Mart's business model is to buy in bulk, break the bulk up into smaller parcels, and ship the parcels to the different stores around the country. That's the core of Wal-Mart. Anyone can do this, as that business model isn't patented.

    14. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might not have heard of the concept called "survival of the fittest". Yes, that does include us humans, because we are infact a species of this planet.

    15. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Attitudes like that result in the problems we have on Earth. It's better to stop competing and start co-operating. Otherwise you are a useless ass. Hmm... you ARE a useless ass, aren't you?

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    16. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by donnz · · Score: 1

      well, that and the fact everyone in the USA spends too much time "remebering" these days.

      --
      -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    17. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am with you comerade,
      as soon as you start the REVOLUTION, I will be the first in the ranks.

    18. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Ithika · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find Wal-Mart's business model is super-saturate an area with outlets being fed from a central depot in that area, selling at little to no profit to starve local competition. When all local competition has died the surplus stores are removed and the prices hiked up to profitable levels again, whilst the Wal-Mart juggernaut rides on.

    19. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Informative
      • Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.
      You just earned yourself a fan. My wife still shops at WalMart and will occasionally drag me along. The few times a year I'm in there just reminds me how much I hate WalMart.

      And don't forget, not only are they leading the destruction of the middle class, they are also responsible for generating about $1000 in annual revenue for every US citizen. They have the power to do what they want in any market segment they turn their crushing retail powers towards.

      Note I didn't say they had the power to be the best in any market segment they turn their attention towards; they just have enough resources (i.e. CASH) they can crush all the quality vendors until there is no other practical choice but WalMart.

    20. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find Wal-Mart's business model is super-saturate an area with outlets being fed from a central depot in that area, selling at little to no profit to starve local competition. When all local competition has died the surplus stores are removed and the prices hiked up to profitable levels again, whilst the Wal-Mart juggernaut rides on.

      I won't disagree with this even though I believe you've overstated it quite a bit. As they are now, left alone, Wal-Mart has nothing to stop them from doing exactly what you said, except for a sense of restraint, which a corporation cannot have.

      There are several Wal-Marts within a reasonable driving range, and there are many, many businesses that thrive in spite of Wal-Mart.

    21. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by pivo · · Score: 1

      So I guess you'd also be for "killing" national defense, right? Why shouldn't we let capitalisim take care of that responsibility too? We should also probably have private law enforcement, 'cause that's capitialistic too. We don't need that socialistic national defense and public law enforcement, that's like communisim!

      You're drunk on capitialisim, like most of us in the US. Either you're very rich or very young and you don't get that life isn't always a smooth ride for the non-very rich.

    22. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by zors · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because we all know that societies that forbid competition thrive far more than capitalist ones. After all, thats the real reason that capitalist societies are in the shitter, especially in technological areas. and quality of life. right?

      Healthy and fair competition is the best thing for society, in nearly every arena.

    23. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      health care should be provided by the state.

    24. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Funny, my highschool buddies have $100K salaries in the elevator business, with pensions and contracts that says they get guaranteed retraining and/or other guaranteed jobs if they get layed off.


      Heck, I've even got a friend who went from ASIC design back into elevator repair.


      Some unions seems more beneficiall to their members than others.

    25. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Remeber how much you love WalMart when that's the only job available to you, and the wages from your WalMart job are so low you can only afford to shop at WalMart.

      Excactly. I equate WalMart == poor.

      I don't have a problem with people making little money. That is a different thing. But people that are poor just suck. Ask Kenney.

      Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.

      Yup. Again, poor people are those that work 50-60 hours a week at 1 or 2 jobs and still are able to have enough money to finance banks with overdraft fees.

      I don't care about how cheap something is, or if its not at WalMart I don't need it mentality. What kind of precident is this setting? To strive for the lowest common denominator. To drive a company out of business so that we can now have $2.97 gallon jars of pickels. To retire and be a greeter.

      Have some dignity people. Money does not equal wealth, and lack of money does not equal poverty.

    26. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by beliavsky · · Score: 2, Informative

      If this post is regarded as "insightful", I must say that the moderators need to learn some economics. Do you think that WalMart pays less than Goldman Sachs because the big shots at Goldman Sachs are kind and generous people? If certain WalMart employees don't earn that much, it's because no other employer is bidding more for their skills. That's what their labor is worth on the free market. WalMart is a great benefactor of the lower and middle classes, because it expands their purchasing power. If you think WalMart is mean, try starting a small business, hiring away WalMart employees at higher wages, and making a profit. THEN you have to right to bash WalMart. Talk is cheap.

    27. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Tozog · · Score: 1

      Except Wal-Mart is completely against ever paying overtime, so you'll never work more than 40 hours a week. They provide a decent healthcare plan, much better than any other minimum wage job anyway.

      Wal-mart is the pinicle of a very successful business. You can't fault them for making money, it's what they are supposed to do.

    28. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care."

      whoa, good thing i shop at Kmart

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    29. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Firedog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not only that, but Walmart also contributes a lot to Republicans, who in turn are actively pursuing the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care, as you said.

      Why shop at stores that contribute to the destruction of the American way of life? Check out buyblue.org and choosetheblue.com and shop accordingly...

    30. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by blanks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you will forget that we will still have the choice to work at mcdonalds or blockbuster, the other 2 predatory corporations that all share the same business plan. Move into small towns, destroy the economy, remove jobs, and basically take over any type of industry that might have existed in the past.

      Yes you can save money, but their is allways a price, be it quality, ethics, or price.

      Personally My ethics are not so cheap as to be willing to give them away so easily to save a few bucks.

    31. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by blanks · · Score: 1

      "Nevermind the complete loss of any motivation to outperform your peers and better yourself."

      Exactlly, why attempt to out proform or better yourself when you live in a small town where the only places to work are wallmart or fast food chains.

      Most people will have a hard enough time getting through each day let alone save up for collage, but then again alot of people who work jobs like this for more then a few years forget the concept of trying to improve your self or to excel in anything. they just live to be in dept.

    32. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some people have no friggin concept of the economy and capitalism whatsoever. As if the great founders of America implanted a economic system based around freedoms and capitalism... but they had NO IDEA there would be someplace like Wal-Mart!!!

      I hope you are trolling, because otherwise you are the worst informed back seat economist who ever lived. Any first year econ undergrad knows that in 1776 (the year Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations and the US declared independence) nobody predicted liberal monopolism and concentration of production, much less the concentration of retail. They thought monopolies were something created by government fiat, because those were the only monopolies that existed then. Adam Smith would have been horrified by Walmart.
    33. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Healthy and fair competition is different from favortism and near-monopolistic power grabbing.

      Wal-Mart and other similarly large companies leverage extreme control on market sectors that they got through legitimate means to do questionable things. The problem here is that people like Sam Walton found companies by working their bloody asses off and being smart about their business, then they turn it over to ass-lickers like Michael Duke and company who just leverage their predecessor's success to make their own lazy fortunes.

      Capitalism works great until it succeeds. Then, it's just a welfare program for the already-rich. The longer that system is allowed to run, the more corrupt the original idea of capitalism becomes. We began regulating companies for a reason, don't turn your back on those reasons just because you don't know history.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    34. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi it's good to be here on planet Earth may I please have some money with which to establish myself please?

      Thanks.

    35. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "we are infact a species of this planet"

      Temporarily you are.

      We Transhumans have plans for you. We intend to teach you what Darwinian competition is really about.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    36. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care.

      Funny, my wife's uncle works at wall mart, is paid just fine (he and his wife live off the income), works a 40-hour work week and has health benefits.

      But, you bring up something... why should an employer pay for your health insurance? What's wrong with them *not* paying for your health insurance and perhaps giving the money to you in the form of a higher wage?

      Perhaps it is pro government health care folks say, and you are too stupid to evaluate your own health care and insurance needs...

      Just remember, nobody makes anyone work at Wal*Mart, McDonald's, or anywhere else.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    37. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Omniscientist · · Score: 1

      True, however in the case of Walmart they are not necesarrily an institution that promotes any sort of competition, at least in Walmart's industry.

    38. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by JDDoyle · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true wacko leftist fringe element type that just can't stand free enterprise. Wal-Mart delivers to their customers what they want, low prices. Market forces win out, friend. The only party to the destruction of the American middle class is the Democratic Party and their "tax and spend" cradle to grave entitlements mentality.

    39. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just remember, nobody makes anyone work at Wal*Mart, McDonald's, or anywhere else.
      I'm Mr. Hunger, you may have heard of me.
    40. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I am college educated and and live at home with my parents and am applying at several retailers stocking shelves.

      Why?

      Because Walmart and most of corporate America has become obessed with outsourcing in order to cut prices.

      So it is the problem.

      Many computer science students are lucky if they end up working at 7-11 repairing slurpie machines.

      So where do you go?

    41. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Amazing how Walmart has enough money to pay $1000 for every US citizen yet finds ways to make their employee's work off the clock, pay no medical benefits, and pay rock bottom for all their associates.

    42. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by usurper_ii · · Score: 1

      They do have good health insurance *if* you are a full time employee. The thing is, unless you work at a Wal-Mart Warehouse (fairly good money there) or you are in Wal-Mart Management and/or have a skilled office job (e.g. working in the Cash Office counting their money), you will *only* be part time. (As a side note, the only job I have ever seen where part-time employess get fully-paid health insurance is the union-controlled Krogers. But they have their own problems, too.)

      There are people who have worked many years at Wal-Mart and are still only part time, thus no insurance. I myself worked over a year at a Wal-Mart with no hint of ever going full time, until I got promoted to the Cash Office. Had it not been for that, I'm not sure I would have ever gained full-time status.

      Let me tell you, these mega-corps have it figured out and they aren't going to spend a penny they don't have to pay, because they have 200 vice presidents, all with health care, that are going to get a fat bonus every year for keeping it that way.

    43. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Tozog · · Score: 1

      *shrug* I worked for Wal-Mart for 3 months. After 90 days, I was told I was eligible for health benefits. They would cover 60% of the premium cost, if I remember correctly.

      I worked in the electronics department full-time as a regular associate. I started at Wal-Mart as a full time employee.

      Hiring practices are very much up to the individual managers, not some corporate edict from above.

      Of course, as soon as a real job offer came along, I ditched Wal-mart the same day.

    44. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      You jerks are all the same. Did I ever say I support socialism or communism? That's what you imply by talking about "societies that forbid competition". Can't you find some middle ground between ass licking your capitalist masters and being fucked in the ass by power hungry totalitarians? Capitalism is fine and dandy as long as we remember that the customers come first, the employees (the ones who do the actual work) come second and management and share holders come dead last.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    45. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tellin' it like it is. ;P They don't know what's going to hit them do they.

    46. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Hi there, useless ass here. You do know why they call it Capitalism right? The important part is Capital. Now human capital tends to be the most interchangable. My point is with out competition(bigger, beter, faster, more) you get stagnation and decay.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    47. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Hi useless ass. :)

      I know what capitalism is. What I'm saying is to find the middle ground between capitalism and socialism. A nice combo would work out much better than what we have in the US now.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    48. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Nexus7 · · Score: 1

      You said:
      "Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class, the 40 hour work week, and employer paid health care."

      Walmart just carried the possibilities allowed by "the system" to their economically logical conclusion. Yeah, I live in union-rich Chicago and have plently of union (and non-union) shops to choose from, but it isn't the same everywhere, and it isn't like they're doing anything illegal. The "people" chose this system (a lot of them anyway) and Walmart is just working it.

      And furthermore, this can only hurt the Dells and HP and other glorified importers in the long run. If they are allowed to suppress "innovation" by making it economically feasible only to cater to the mass market and lowest price point, then the incentive of competition as a driver of innovation is lost anyway. In which case, we might as well let Walmart out-Dell Dell.

    49. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by jak163 · · Score: 1

      Those countries were are non-competitive with have much higher unionization rates and much more extensive regulation. Unions are not the cause of the loss of competitiveness in those industries.

    50. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by mutterc · · Score: 1
      It's not just Walmart (although I do refrain from shopping there for just that reason). It's any corporation.

      Capitalism is destroying society; all the forces are pushing everything towards a world where a few mega-corps own and control everything, and everyone else lives in Third-World conditions. Nobody will be able to climb out of that poverty, because *whoosh* if their standards of living go up any, the jobs will just move to somewhere where the standards of living are still low.

      (Yes, this will eat into the corps' profits, but they'll no doubt still manage to survive, and they don't / can't think in that long of a time horizon anyway).

      I don't know what to do to fight this - I could try to buy from socially-responsible companies (it is possible, in our society, for a small business to have ethics - only big businesses (with several or more investors) must give up their ethics). I could try to lobby for better labor and consumer-protection laws. Any of it would be like standing under Niagra Falls with a golf umbrella trying to stop the water.

      It seems all I can do (since I'll never be able to rise to the top of the capitalist heap) is try to prepare for a life of abject poverty.

    51. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up, people. Wal*Mart only controls the job supply if you let it.

      I don't let it control the job supply, but apparently it still does it anyway.

    52. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by timster · · Score: 1

      Maybe you haven't lived in a real small town pre-Wal-Mart, where the economy is controlled by local barons who make sure that nobody gets a job unless they are the right color and go to the right church. Then they take the profits and buy imported knick-knacks from France.

      American small town business as a whole has never had ethics that were any higher than Wal-Mart's.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    53. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "Middile Ground"TM you speak of?

    54. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hat I'm saying is to find the middle ground between capitalism and socialism."

      oh good...a middle ground between wine and poison...great idea...
      oh, and btw, socialism is the poison (you seem not to get this point) ...and no...you don't know what capitalism is...read a freakn book

    55. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by usurper_ii · · Score: 1

      *shrug*, granted it has been about 10 years since I have worked for Wal-Mart, unless something drastic has changed, I would say you were the exception to the rule. Not that I'm an expert on Wal-Mart or anything, but after discussing this with various Wal-Mart employees and from various stores, over the years, they all said about the same thing I did (at least for the store and not the warehouse, which does hire a lot of full time employees). At Supercenters, the policy seems to be department managers are full time and regular associates are part time for quite some time before getting to go full time.

      Wal-Mart is also very good at hiring seasonally, as well. Which is another good crop of people they will never have to pay for insurance on.

      But if you went to full time after 90 days, sounds good to me!

      Way back then, I left Krogers to go to Wal-Mart because the union at Krogers sucked and there was no way to advance other than waiting for the people at the top to die. Wal-Mart, even with no insurance, was better because hard work *could* pay off. But I would hate to have to go back to either place, personally.

      Usurper_ii

    56. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for the links, now I know what Democrat/Socialist supporting companies to avoid!

    57. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      That's revenue, not profit. Gross revenue, at that. Basically, it's a useless figure that only shows how much money flows through WalMart on it's way to suppliers, employees, and shareholders.

      Don't forget that WalMart is also the largest employer in the US, with more than 1 million employees. And, though I have no evidence to back this up, I've heard they operate on profit margins of 10-20%.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    58. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by bechthros · · Score: 1

      You seem to be equating WalMart's market hegemony with competition. Competition is among more than one party, competition isn't just one company getting incredibly huge and eating up every other company or market that poses any kind of competition to it. WalMart seems to me to be the very essence of anti-competition.

      Call me crazy, but where I come from Capialism (which I do conisder a good thing) requires competition and a marketplace. When you remove any and all real, substantial competition from Capitalism, it becomes Corporatism, which I do definately consider a bad thing. It's not Capitalism if nobody can compete with the behemoths that are already on the scene. And it's not much of a marketplace if one major player dominates everything, because who's going to choose, voluntarily, to pay a higher price? And the ultimate loser is always the consumer, the very person Capitalism is supposed to be good for (by offering choices in the marketplace).

      And while I agree that capital is important, let's not forget that all capital comes from WORK. Which is done by PEOPLE. Without workers there would be no companies, no managers, and no capital. People can get by just fine without corporations, corporations can't get by without people (as workers and consumers). Capital is certainly important, and many companies do make life more pleasant, but we've lost all sense of BALANCE between labor and capital. The Capitalist system only works when both labor and capital are valued. And if we don't correct the imbalance, the system will crash.

    59. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Well, my original point was a rebuttal of the statement, "Life is not a competetion..." I don't disagree that Walmarts rapid growth is not troubling much like the robber barons of the early 20th century. I will disagree with the statement that PEOPLE can live without corporations(here I mean large organizations designed to assist in distribution of limited resources in a marketplace), a person could live without this, but as mention in previous posts PEOPLE(large populations) need efficent methods of producing goods and services. I'll spare everyone the econ 101 lecture on monopolies and waste. I would also agree that the legal fiction that a corporation is a person instead of merely a limited liabilty partnership of many individuals, is also a problem that needs to be fixed else the system will crash.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    60. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Agree 100%. The people I went to high school with never went to college, because the union would get them US$40K a year jobs with full benefits right after high school. They scoffed at college.

      What the hell is wrong with being able to make a reasonable living without going to college?

      Shit, I went to college....a good one to, but it's not for everybody. We NEED dishwashers, electricians, plumbers, etc and those people don't need a four year degree to do thier job.

      The problem is not lazy teamsters, it is "free trade" and corporate political control.
      Have you even thought about this very much? Say there was a country where EVERYONE was willing to work for less than us and ALL our jobs got shipped overseas, how is that good for us?

      Grow up, people. Wal*Mart only controls the job supply if you let it. Train yourself for something other than stocking shelves or waving UPC's over scanners. Especially since we're automating that function, too.

      Wow, you're a rotten SOB aren't you?
      See unlike you I realize that I was LUCKY to be able to go to the school I did. I worked hard, but I had advantages many others will never have. Sure I'm doing okay as an electrical engineer, but suggesting that everyone get an advanced degree is like suggesting that everyone become a pro football player. If you had a real grasp of the economics involved, you'd realize that there are other issues here, like distribuation of wealth, free trade, corporate welfare, limited demand for skilled labor, etc.
      Just as not everyone can get rich throwing a ball through a hoop, not everyone can get rich by going to college.


      PS Don't get me wrong. I'm not agaist as many people going to college as possible, but you're a fucked-up social darwinist if you believe those who can't succed at it deserve no quality of life whatsoever. It's sad to see someone have so much contempt for their fellow man just because HE doesn't think they studied enough.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    61. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by TrailerTrash · · Score: 1
      What the hell is wrong with being able to make a reasonable living without going to college?

      Shit, I went to college....a good one to, but it's not for everybody. We NEED dishwashers, electricians, plumbers, etc and those people don't need a four year degree to do thier job.

      The problem is not lazy teamsters, it is "free trade" and corporate political control. Have you even thought about this very much? Say there was a country where EVERYONE was willing to work for less than us and ALL our jobs got shipped overseas, how is that good for us?

      Countries like that exist right now, all over the world. Assuming you're in the US, we only account for 4% of the world's population, but a wildly disproportionate amount of income and resource consumption. Most of the world's populations live in countries where their annual wage looks like our median weekly paycheck.

      How is that good for us? Countries, populations and subpopulations have to specialize. Some specialize in manufacturing, some in services, some in intellectual capital creation, etc. Everyone gets more efficient, and resources are used more optimally worldwide.

      Every single person needs to think about how they can make lives better for those around them, how they can contribute to the success of the charity, business, family, or governmental institution they work for.

      What grates on my nerves is the attitude of entitlement so many US citizens (and non-citizens) have. That they should be paid a wage wildly out of proportion to the value they bring to their employer. Should someone make $40K for driving a forklift? It has nothing to do with whether or not $40K is a "living wage" - it has everything to do with whether or not $40K is a good investment in human capital to get a job done. Far too many people, IMHO, expect to be paid what they want, not a fair return for the value they provide.

      Does Wal*Mart owe someone $20 an hour for stocking shelves? No. Because it's not worth that kind of money. And the local merchant who DID pay their stockboys $20 an hour? He's out of business. Is that bad? Ask the people in town who all collectively pay less for their hardware and groceries. They always had the choice, when Wal*Mart moved to town, to shop at the local guy. But guess what? They didn't. And Wal*Mart grew into the world's largest retailer.

      Heck yes, we need dishwashers, lawnmowers, etc. But most people dissatisfied with their wage have avenues to improve their skills and earn more. College is not necessarily for everyone, yet - soon it will be, just like high school is mandantory for most of the US population - but if you don't make it to college, don't expect to be paid like you did.

      Wow, you're a rotten SOB aren't you? See unlike you I realize that I was LUCKY to be able to go to the school I did. I worked hard, but I had advantages many others will never have. Sure I'm doing okay as an electrical engineer, but suggesting that everyone get an advanced degree is like suggesting that everyone become a pro football player.

      I DO appreciate my going to school. I owed a boatload of money for it too, which I paid back. I worked hard, and make a nice wage. And I don't sit around and complain that I should be making more, if I'm not willing to make myself more valuable. Which I am - I'm working on additional industry certifications right now. Will my pay go up? Probably not. But if I do a better job for my employer as a result of my increased skill level, that's a good thing.

      If you had a real grasp of the economics involved, you'd realize that there are other issues here, like distribuation of wealth, free trade, corporate welfare, limited demand for skilled labor, etc.

      I hope you see that I perhaps do have a deeper grasp of the issues than you assume.

      Distribution of wealth - which is better, making a lot of local merchants quite well off, by charging high prices for every single nut and bolt to e

    62. Re:Gotta love Walmart... by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Except Wal-Mart is completely against ever paying overtime, so you'll never work more than 40 hours a week.

      Except that they also completely insist on getting all the work done. So sometimes managers have felt forced to make people work until the job is finished, and any work over 40 hours goes unpaid. They've been sued for it several times.

      Wal-mart is the pinicle of a very successful business. You can't fault them for making money, it's what they are supposed to do.

      I can fault them for doing it illegaly. I can fault them for driving manufacturers out of business by demanding 5% cost reductions every year. I can fault them for crushing any attempts to form a union.

  2. Seems cheap for what you get ... by airrage · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... you must be unfamiliar with Wal-Mart.

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by DJStealth · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by l810c · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I don't understand their pricing structure.

      For $499 you get:
      VIA C3 processor 1.0 GHz
      14.1" LCD panel
      Lindows/Linspire version 4.5
      128 MB memory
      30 GB hard drive
      CD-ROM drive

      For $549 you get:
      1.1 GHz Mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor
      14.1" XGA TFT LCD screen
      40 GB hard drive
      128 MB RAM
      DVD-ROM drive
      Integrated 802.11b wireless networking
      Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

      Notice the cheapo monitor doesn't say TFT. Besides that for the extra $50 you get Windows Xp Home(Ebay?), Althon & .1 GHz, DVD vs CD, 10GB Xtra HD, Wireless.

    3. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 5, Funny

      that .1ghz also equates to about double the performance of the "1ghz" VIA C3 chip.

    4. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Wife went and purchased 6 cheap mini blinds at Wal-Mart. The last one broke yesterday. All of them broke at exactly the same place, where the cords enter the main assembly.
      I purchase brand name consumables such as food, detergents etc. at Wal-Mart and nothing else, because everything they sell is junk.

    5. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, about a year ago, they were about to market something like this. at the time, it was a light subnotebook with the older ezra processor. I do not think it ever shipped in quantity. then it disappeared. this seems sort of rewarmed.

      of course, we would love to know what c3 chip is it, and how much it weighs! /ac

    6. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by westlake · · Score: 1
      I don't understand their pricing structure

      But it does explain why Linux is going nowhere in the mass consumer market.
      There are economies of scale and Windows sells.

    7. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by kd5ujz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is targeted at the typical walmart costumer. They will buy the $499 laptop, if the 549 laptop was $500, because the $499 is cheaper.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    8. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm trying to figure out who's making these things. Search google for "Balance" and "laptop" and about all you come up with is things saying "hey... walmart has sub-$500 computers." I'm really wanting some specifics on the specs (eg. as far as I can tell the $50 more one has a parallel port, but no serial... the cheaper doesn't mention either). The "specs" listed for the cheaper one are almost ALL talking about the OS/software. It's like they're trying to convince everyone that they really are ok to use. Also, there's only one pic of it so I can't even self-diagnose.

      Ommited from your list: the $549 one has gigabit ethernet where as the other doesn't even mention ethernet.

    9. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by LoveTheIRS · · Score: 1

      This linux laptop is horrible, You can wait for your computer to charge 3.5 hours for a 1.5 battery life. Ick. It's so bad it makes me want to choke. *Sarcasm* At least it runs linux */Sarcasm* --- I thought I had Karma to burn...untill I didn't have Karma to burn.

    10. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does it have a *battery*? When searching for cheap laptops I found a few at Walmart.com (this was a few months ago) that didn't actually have batteries. They were just basically all-in-one portable PCs.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    11. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      did anyone notice there doesn't seem to be a PCMCIA slot anywhere? Better be happy with what it has because you'll never be able to add anything like firewire, etc.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


      Well, to give the VIA laptop some more credit, it uses less power probably than the AMD one. ...other than that, the AMD system actually looks pretty darn nice (even TV out), but damn those touch-pad mice drive me nuts.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    13. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by slowbad · · Score: 2, Insightful
      that .1ghz also equates to about double the performance of the "1ghz" VIA C3 chip

      Hardly an exaggeration ... a year ago, for $55, NewEgg sold a Celeron MB populated with a
      VIA 'GigaPro' C3 that would have taken 17 years with Prime95 to complete a single test.

      --
      Sandra identified the C3 chip as Samuel or Ezekiel.
      It certainly would require a miracle of Biblical proportions
      for a VIA 1GHz to beat a Pentium 166MMX ...

    14. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by kbranch · · Score: 1

      +4 Funny? I have a 1.3 GHz C3 relative (not exactly sure what it is) that's significantly slower than my old Celeron 633. Celerons are far worse than a P3 of the same speed, so I'd say that the Athlon is much more than twice the speed.

    15. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Walmart wont even ship HDTV"s from sony and other brand names because some unknown Chinesse manufactor can sell the same TV for $100 cheaper. Keep in mind they are around $4000 in value so $100 is nothing.

      But hey, its walmart. Whoever can stock it hte cheapest wins.

      The ladder is a greater value of course but its only price that walmart cares about even if its very very tiny percentages.

    16. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Are they seriously that slow?

    17. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      " did anyone notice there doesn't seem to be a PCMCIA slot anywhere?"

      Of course. That would cost money silly. Unless you do insane things to keep costs down, walmart frankly wont ship your product.

      I bet this is how the particular vendor won the contract for the right to have the product on store shelves.

    18. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by arivanov · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they are not. We have 30-40 of these we use for developer testing, servers, etc.

      They are 2-4 times faster on IDE access then any 32bit P3-4 system including Xeons. Rest of the IO is also quite good (around 2 times better then comparable P3). As a result they make very good small servers.

      CPU performance is nothing to shout about, but hardly slow. It is similar to PIII at the same speed. Possibly 10-20% slower, but not more. Actually it depends on what are you doing because they have smaller cache then PIII (only 64k).

      Thermals are phenomenal. A C3 eats 1-5W where P3 eats 70+.

      They are rumoured to be extremely sluggish for a completely unrelated reason. The early EPIA (as well as some current non-Via system) motherboards shipped with a Cyberblade on board. It has shared memory. So when a geek takes it his first reaction is to pump up the video frequency and resolution as high as the system can bare. As a result the video is accessing the memory at 150MHz pixel clock. That into a considerable portion of the memory bandwidth. In fact the slowing down between 60 and 90Hz vertical sync is clearly visible. This is no longer the case with newer motherboards which have a fairly decent 2D video with its own memory.

      Overall it depends what you use it for. If you want a silent low maintenance server or test box. It is perfect. If you want a silent typewriter/mail desktop it will do the job. If you want to play doom3 you are got to be kidding.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    19. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. They aren't fast, and more importantly they have jack worth of cache and no hyperthreading, but they're respectable due to their very low power requirements and reasonable bus speeds. They're good for building small, low-power computers, which is nice because you want that in a laptop. The latest ones have AES acceleration and random number generation on them.

      The next version (due out... about... now, which means who knows when given VIA) will have additionally no-execute, SHA-1, and Montgomery multiply acceleration (i.e. multiply big numbers fast). Plus they're said to run at 2GHz at 10 Watts, and have a bigger cache. If this is actually true, it will be great for building a backup server, which would have to copy large amounts of data over SSH. Now if only they can build in bzip2...

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    20. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, this one has a 4-cell battery (doesn't say how long it runs, but I'd guess about 2 or 3 hours - the processor IS a C3, after all). However, note that it doesn't even say it's got a MODEM.

    21. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      modem, laptop? that's so 1999's. even road wariorers have figured out that using their cell phone gives better laptopping (you don't need a local jack/line).

      my laptop has a modem. i wish it had IEEE 1394 instead, but i just got a card to make up that deficancy. it has also an internal 10/100 chip that i don't use. some might find that usefull, but again, a card would solve that problem.

      note also, i think the wal-mart site claims 1.5 hrs battery life. they're probably being honest. those who claim 3-4 hrs life are full of manure.

    22. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Not hard to figure out (unless there's OCing going on). The Ezra was VERY limited in production at 1GHz (as in, it was a stop-gap measure until VIA could get Nehemiah out). While HKEPC somehow got a 1GHz Samuel-2 (I'm thinking it was an OC), this is most likely a Nehemiah, an Antaur (AKA C3-M, AKA low voltage Nehemiah that's not quite as low power as an Eden), or a C5P Nehemiah.

    23. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by ElPresidente1972 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now just imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things!

    24. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Veccio · · Score: 1

      The $499 laptop is a perfect example of what is known to Wal-Mart as the "loss leader". Sure, $499 it's a striking number and it is getting a lot of press. It creates a mental association of Wal*Mart and low prices in Joe Consumer's mind. But who ever buys the cheapest item in the product line?
      Here's what I view as two likely scenarios:

      1) Layperson goes to Wal-Mart to get a computer. They see "laptop" and $499. They are instantly sold, convinced and proud that they have the 'best value'. Their purchase was not driven by the technical details or quality as much as a 'good buy'.
      2) The layperson sees this amazingly cheap $499 laptop at Wal-Mart. However, once they are at the store with the intent to pick it up, they see this other laptop for $50 more with "Windows" like they have in school or work, and a DVD player.

      Which do you think is going to be flying off the shelves? For a much better idea of what loss leaders are, and their pricing schemes I highly recommend this article:

      http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/77/walmart.h tm l

    25. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A modem? My ThinkPad has one built in, its even supported under Linux, but I've never used it. My PowerBook has one, and I've never used that one either. Just about any place I go these days is going to have wireless Internet or at least an Ethernet jack. Even the cheapo Best Western I stayed at in a Texas border town (near the Mexican border that is) a couple weeks ago had free wireless Internet, and its available all over here in Austin. Heck, most places you wouldn't want to use dialup, a lot of them charge big $$$ even for local calls!

    26. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that I'd USE a modem, I'm just saying that a modem is something the average person who would buy this laptop would want. After all, how else are they going to get on their dial-up with what's on this laptop?

    27. Re:Seems cheap for what you get ... by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough it is not a bad idea for one application - brute forcing AES.

      You can get as much as 10 CPUs per U in a standard 9" rack using bog standard VIA motherboards. Their AES performance is about 4 times higher then the best P4 or Opteron around due to the hardware acceleration.

      So if you have a hard "nut" to crack it may be a good idea because cipher cracking is very easy to parallelise.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  3. Runs Linux by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 5, Funny

    It DOES run linux?
    Well, I think this is the reason there are no posts. ^_^

    1. Re:Runs Linux by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      It DOES run linux?

      With those specs it certainly won't run windows with any enthusiasm.

    2. Re:Runs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They all run linux. Knoppix, Damn Small Linux, etc.
      I remaster both, and I am familiar with the limitations of trying to run an OS on a box that was
      not engineered for _that_ OS, but the live-cd linux
      OS's will run on most. Windows success has been that
      the machines were engineered from the beginning to run their OS, so all that the end user has to do is turn the machine on, and the desktop appears. Even
      with the Knoppix live cd setups, one must have some sort of "boot: fb800x600 knoppix acpi=off myconfig=scan" stuff to get going.
      All they are trying to do with a hdd install of Linspire is to do what Windows has done all along.
      Mentioning Walmart? The online "Walmart" is just a name, not the "real Walmart" where Joe Sixpack shops. When this box appears _there_ then it's news.

    3. Re:Runs Linux by nabil_IQ · · Score: 1

      after reading the specs, I think it's LINUX running it ;)

      --

      Won't somebody please think of the Karma!
    4. Re:Runs Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UH, linspire/lindows IS NOT linux! can't you people get that thru your heads........geeze

      besides why pay linspire/lindows for software that one can find on the www for FREE!

    5. Re:Runs Linux by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      Screw Linux, does it run MacOS X? No? I'll take an iBook over this piece of junk any day.

    6. Re:Runs Linux by lobotomy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't jump to conclusions. This has a Via C3. I just tried to update my server which also contains a Via C3 (low power, low heat, don't need any more horsepower). SuSE will not run on the C3 (but at least they tell you that up front). But guess what? Neither will Fedora Core 2 (yes, I even used the special C3 kernel) nor FC 3. Red Hat dropped support for the C3 but didn't even bother to document that fact. I ended up taking a Celeron processor from an old Barbi FlexATX computer.

      So, don't assume that your Linux will run on a C3. It seems that more and more distros are supporting the AMD/Intel duopoly only and are refusing to support the Via (it's not as though it isn't be made any more).

    7. Re:Runs Linux by paulatz · · Score: 1

      Maybe you are right: but looking for C3 processor problems with linux does not find chipset-specific poblems at all.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    8. Re:Runs Linux by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      .. I'll take a sub-$500 iBook over this piece of junk any day too!

      Come to think of it, I'd take a (sub $500) Aston Martin over this piece of junk too! ...hold on, where's that list of mine, I've got a few more wishes left. Isn't that what karma's good for?

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    9. Re:Runs Linux by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I hate how people keep on saying that windows runs slow. If you take a fresh install of Linux (with KDE or Gnome), and a fresh install of windows 2000, and compare the responsiveness of the UI, and the speed to load programs, then I think you'll find that windows wins hands down. I've got a PII-266, so I should know.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  4. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The "Rectractable Cable Lock for Laptops" seems a little unnessecary for this thing...

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      People around here steal laptops, not bothering with the chargers, then sell them for 20 bucks a pop. You could sell this at 20 bucks just as easily as a 2000 dollar Dell.

  5. Equates Linux with Cheap?? by The+UberDork · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, is this kinda thing gonna shoot us in the foot, and make Linux mean cheap in the public eye? And I mean cheap, NOT inexpensive.

    1. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by phasm42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up. If this becomes common, people are going to remember Linspire/Linux==slow because it's always installed on slow computers.

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
    2. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, It equates Linspire with cheap, ripoff, soul-sucking subscription-required package-management-$ystem, etc.

      If Linpire becomes associated with Linux in the public eye, then that that does severe damage to the image of Linux in general.

      Its a lot like a "Walmart Bike". Sure wouldn't want to use it for transportation. "Walmart Linux".. Hmm. come to think of it, that pretty well describes Linspire.

    3. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 0

      So...its all just an evil plot by Micro$shit?

    4. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may have a point. I think the whole Linspire model of charging for what should be free will do the most damage, though.

      However, I do have to applaud Wal-Mart for making the effort. They're trying to do the right thing, even if they're not going about it the right way. I wonder, is selling a Linux laptop their idea, or did a vendor approach them with this? Considering their previous forays into Linux computers, I have to think that someone at the company is trying to do this. Problem is, they're aiming at the ultra-cheap market, which is probably made up of non-Linux-savvy people, and I'm sorry, but Linux isn't made for them...yet.

      I'm really not sure what direction Wal-Mart needs to go with getting Linux PCs out there, but this just feels wrong.

    5. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who thinks that a 1Ghz PC is slow is just plain spoiled. (snicker)

    6. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by 3rd_Floo · · Score: 1

      I know your an AC, but have you ever seen a VIA 1ghz in action, as a previous poster pointed out and IMHE, they dont preform much better than a PIII-500mhz.

    7. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by John3 · · Score: 1
      Could be the case...this happened with some of the early home computers (Atari for example) when they were added to the department store shelves. The price dropped compared to prices at computer specialty shops but people bought them and were disappointed since they weren't trained to use them (or the department store carried no accessories, software, etc.). Atari, TI, Commodore, Colecovision all became more of a joke than a computer (well, Colecovison was a joke to start with) while Apple and IBM stuck with the computer dealers and stayed "serious".

      That's not to say there weren't enthusiasts for particular machines (notably Commodore) but to the general public these machines had been cheapened by showing up in the department stores.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    8. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's true! Linux is slower than XP. I guess you still get more value per dollar with Linux, but it's really worth it to go spend the extra money for a well-tuned OS.

    9. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by grumbel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, what are people going to do with their Linux-Installation:

      a) Wipe it out and replace it with Windows
      b) Throw the computer into the trashcan
      c) Continue to use Linux because it gets the job done

      I think c) is perfectly ok, b) is rather unlikly and if they do a), what do you expect? Either WinXP will run even more slow or it will be a faster, if its slower, no lose, people will figure its not Linux fault that the computer is slow, if XP is faster, then well, Linux IS actually slow and people will remember it, because its the truth. Can't see anything bad with that.

    10. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      I got a via 800ghz engineering sample (I had a buddy that worked for via) its running in an old shuttle sv24. Yes the thing is slow, but it was my first linux box and I liked it. Trust me, most people shopping at walmart and buying $450 PC's will probably think its damn fast.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    11. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      You make the unfortunate assumption that EVERY person who buys this laptop is a techie who's out to install windows on it.

      With prices so low for a laptop, there will be a lot of non-techies who buy this, notice how slow it is, and compare it to whatever other computers (likely running XP) they are exposed to. they'll just notice "oh, it's linux, and it's slower than windows on my 8GHz P6. stupid linux" or whatever.

    12. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by zygote · · Score: 1

      Granted I know almost nothing about Lindows/Linspire, but in general isn't this a big "selling" point for any Linux install "runs well on old a.k.a. slow hardware"?

      The other side of the coin is, couldn't you jam a 512 stick of RAM in (assuming there is at least still one open slot on the mb), wipe the drive and install a nice, fast distro and wind up with a very usable machine for email, web, word-processing (the usual.)

      Which makes me wonder what folks would put on a machine like this instead of Linspire to get an environment that will be as supposedly easy for a civilian as Linspire purports to be?

      --
      the future is here, it is just not evenly distributed - w. gibson
    13. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by MadChicken · · Score: 1

      I think I'd be quite happy with an 800GHz chip too.

      Or did you mean MHz?

      --
      SYS 64738 NO CARRIER
    14. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A)
      then
      b)
      Then
      c) ...
      Profit!

    15. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

      compare it to whatever other computers (likely running XP) they are exposed to. they'll just notice "oh, it's linux, and it's slower than windows on my 8GHz P6. stupid linux"

      Nah. I don't think so. I think it will be more of a "Well, I guess that's what I get for buying a $500 laptop. Stupid wal-mart computer - i shoulda got a Dell." The non-techie user will probably adjust pretty well actually seeing the cost benefits of a Linux OS on a cheaper than dirt laptop.

    16. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      people will figure its not Linux fault that the computer is slow

      Not likely. They will probably either assume the computer is crap, but continue to associate Linux with crap. Or convince themselves that Windows really is faster. After all most people have a vested interest in so believing after they have spent a pile of money and time putting Windows on it. People have a tendency to believe that they are always right, and defend any mistake they make. I can see people in the future arguing about how slow and crappy their computer was with Linux on it, and still others arguing that Linux makes computers slow, even after it is replaced with Windows. It is, sadly, the way people work.

    17. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think so. The non-techie doesn't care or know about GHz. He or she thinks that the Windows XP computer from Christmas last year is much faster than the old (spyware-infested) 98 computer because it's got XP, not because it's got a 2GHz Celeron as opposed to a 466MHz K6-2, not because it's got 256MB RAM as opposed to 24MB (yes, I said 24, not 64), but because it's got XP. (I almost said because it wasn't spyware infested, but I forgot - it was an HP, so it had craploads of spyware when I pulled it out of the box).

    18. Re:Equates Linux with Cheap?? by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      heh yeah, 800ghz would rock, but I did mean 800mhz.

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
  6. What everyone wants to know.. by x.Draino.x · · Score: 5, Funny

    But can it run Windows?

    1. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by deft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The parent is probably going to be modded down as a troll or looked down on, but it really is a valid question... as most people will probably want to install windows so they can use the programs familiar to them.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But can it run Windows?

      Well, with 128MB of RAM according to the specs, I wouldn't try iy. At least not a recent version of windows.

    3. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by babtras · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. I have a VIA C3 1GHz mini-itx board. It ran Windows 2000 Advanced Server for awhile. It really hated Windows Media Services though.

    4. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by spdt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Windows XP SP1 on an old Dell Latitude CP (Pentium MMX 133, 128 MB RAM, really heavy), and it runs alright. It hasn't driven me completely crazy yet, but then again, it's mostly just for wardriving.

    5. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      as most people will probably want to install windows so they can use the programs familiar to them

      true. But where are they gonna get it now suprnova is shut down?

    6. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...you're kidding me right? Windows XP and 2000 can both run fine on 128 megs

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    7. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by cduffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Most people"? Naaw. My girlfriend's father is "most people". He doesn't know or care what the OS is or the applications' names are as long as he has email, web access and bare-bones word processing -- and he's out-of-date enough that Windows XP and Office XP will be every bit as foreign as Linspire and OpenOffice.

    8. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Within... *hdd grinds* certain defi-*pause*nitions of *hdd melts down due to excessive paging* fine.

    9. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by IO+ERROR · · Score: 5, Funny

      It can run Windows but you're going to have a hard time finding drivers for the Linmodem.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    10. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows XP might behave this way, but I've gotten 2K running happily in 128MB. No, it doesn't hit swap half as much as you are characterizing.

      I would be more concerned about KDE running happily under such a load. I'd put IceWM on there instead. And don't even think about running OpenOffice.Org...that would kill it DEAD.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    11. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cringe*

    12. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, the modem works fine under Line.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    13. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      ...you're kidding me right? Windows XP and 2000 can both run fine on 128 megs

      I guess technically the OS will 'run fine'. However, I was thinking it might be nice to run an application. When the user runs IE they'll soon see how limited 128MB is. We aren't talking users who are going to tweek their boxes or turn off default services, etc.

    14. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      If by "fine" you mean "really crappy responsiveness and a whole lotta page file activity", then sure... at least for XP.

      I think the goal of a computer system isn't just to run the OS, but some apps as well. 128 MB of RAM might cut it for a video card, but I'd sooner eat my pants than try to run XP on a box that underpowered.

      Linux, on the other hand, won't be quite as pathetically slow.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    15. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by dosius · · Score: 1

      For basic use (Web, e-mail, WP) Windows 2000 runs quite well on even 64 MB (I am unfortunate to be the living proof). I've even done some heavier stuff (can you say fansubbing / light video editing?) in 64 MB.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    16. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by afish40 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I think it's worth mentioning that Fry's Electronics recently had a Linspire machine that was crippled to prevent a Windows installation. As far as I could tell, they had altered the BIOS and removed essential drivers. It's possible that other pre-installed machines could be similarly configured.

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    17. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Xerp · · Score: 2, Funny

      But no-one can get Windows anymore following the recent shutdown of SuprNova and the like... :p

    18. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by vagabond_gr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't worry, I'm currently writing the "Windows on a Wal-Mart Balance Notebook HOWTO".

    19. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Some of the newer distros WILL be that pathetically slow.

      Try a 'user friendly' install of something like Ubuntu on a box. Don't tweak it to get rid of services you don't want (since most people wouldn't know what a background service was if they sat on one) and then compare it with a vanilla install of the latest version of windows.

      Notice the similarity?

      Ubuntu (the nice new user-friendly one) ran like a dog on a machine which ran my nicely configured Windows XP without any problems. If I trimmed down the install, maybe I could squeeze out the same performance. Similar happened with Fedora and Mandrake.

      To summarize - Modern Linux distros that say they are 'Plug And Play' are on a par speed-wise with 'Plug And Play' Windows.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    20. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by netdudeuk · · Score: 1

      And of course, memory is quite cheap these days so when funds permit, regardless of the OS, you can upgrade the RAM and do more with it !

      They main thing here is that the price for a notebook PC has got lower again. Don't think you'kk find one for much less than £500 over here. TBH, the guys in the USA are lucky to be able to get one of those for anything like that price

    21. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL!

    22. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine claims KDE runs fine on his 128 MB computer. It does not run fine at all on 64 MB, which I had to suffer earlier. However, WindowMaker runs on 64 MB, and OpenOffice.org opens and works under that -- and still works after opening Firefox. And Thunderbird. But at that time, switching between apps is dreadfully slow.

      But less than 256 MB in a new computer is an insult to the customer.

    23. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by jamesbuko · · Score: 2, Funny

      My girlfriend's father is "most people". He doesn't know or care what the OS is or the applications' names are as long as he has email, web access and bare-bones word processing...

      and of lastly porn..lots of it.

    24. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      and of lastly porn..lots of it.

      Well, of course. That falls under "web browsing".

    25. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, sounds like a concession to Microsoft.

      Let's face facts. In the cheap market, linux is installed just to shave a couple bucks off the sticker.

      It's not in the OEM's interest to cripple it. They get there money when the box leaves the store. And they lose money if it comes back. Only Microsoft gains from crippling in this way.

    26. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      removed essential drivers.
      Huh? If it didn't have MS Windows installed, exactly where did they "remove essential drivers" from? The MS Windows install disk has its own drivers, or you can download them. How in the _world_ would Fry's "remove essential drivers" from an MS Windows install when MS Windows isn't even installed? That doesn't even make sense.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    27. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well I've run Windows 2000 quite well with 48 megs. I had to turn off 90% of services, which wasn't hard considering it was a featureless P-120 laptop w/ no sound card or anything else integrated (swapping PCMCIA cards for CDROM, modem, and NIC).

      Took me long enough to start in a way Win2k's installer could use the CD, I had to wind up booting off a 98 disc and loading the NT installer from there, but that's another story...

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    28. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 0

      Touche! How eloquent, but I sense you're a little testy, it must have been a while since your last reaming.

    29. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      crippled to prevent a Windows installation

      What a curious use of the word crippled. Are you sure you didn't mean to say liberated, or unshackled?

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    30. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Informative? WinXP _sucks_ with 128 MB of memory. It is really, really bad. There is nothing fine about it. My brother-in-laws laptop came with Win2K and 128 MB and ran just OK. When I "upgraded" him to WinXP Home, it slowed to a crawl. Windows would take ages to redraw. When I upgraded his memory to 256 MB, WinXP Home ran fine. Anything less then 256 MB for Win XP, just isn't worth it. Win2K didn't even work very well with only 128 MB.

      To be fair, modern Linux distros don't do well with only 128 MB if your using the latest KDE or Gnome. If you switch to Fluxbox, IceWM or another low-mem desktop like XFCE, then it works fine. But switching desktops is not really a good option under MS Windows. There are only a few poorly done desktop replacements for explorer.exe IMO. Not that I think explorer.exe is anything great. It is the cause of _all_ my problems under WinXP, but is is better then the replacements I have tried.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    31. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      I had someone bring me a computer for repair the other day (Windows 2000) with 64 MB RAM in it. It actually ran fairly well and there were no complaints from the owner when I asked him if it seemed insanely slow.

      I actually sat and used it, and although switching between apps could take a few seconds, it was typically quite happy and responsive and really wasn't swapping that much.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    32. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      At least not a recent version of windows.

      When I said recent, I didn't mean to include Windows 2000. For one, Windows 2000 is not an OS a Walmart home user would buy for their laptop. Second, its 4 years old. Third, since the machine is shipped with 'Lindows' it would require a full retail version of Windows 2000 - not cheap. Lastly, isn't Windows 2000 going end of life June 2005 for the 'average' user (moving into extended support mode)?

    33. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an old P233MMX touchscreen laptop with 128MB and W2K runs fine on it. I dual-boot, but run 2K because there are no *nix drivers for the touchscreen, and the NT4 drivers work in 2K. Also, note this a Pentium I, heh. It does actually start to slow down as the registry inflates, but it is pretty snappy after a fresh install, and turning off unnecessary services, etc.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    34. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by dosius · · Score: 1

      48 MB, on a Pentium/120? My God, you ARE a masochist... ROFL, it took me a lot to dare to run more than 98SE on this beast! (Though, it runs much more smoothly; far fewer reboots needed.)

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    35. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took my old hard drive from my Dell P 3 256 and stuck in a P3 550 that I built. (Yah I know stupid my buyign a Dell but I was young and naive.) The hard drive reconized that it wasn't in a Dell "BIOS" PC any more and refused to boot. Gave an error message saying sorry you must use this version of Windows with Dell equipment.

    36. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's virtually impossible to find a download location for a lot of noname hardware.

      Plus, the built-in Windows drivers tend to be less forgiving about PCI IDs than the Linux ones. (ie a Frobozz ABC might be the same as the Fooco DEF, but the Windows driver won't pick it up).

      So, by not including a Windows driver disk, you can easily cripple a cheap noname machine.

    37. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      Falls under? That is "web browsing."

    38. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by falsified · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he means crippled. If someone chooses to install Windows, let them.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    39. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This exchange is the funniest thing i've read in a long time. thank you.

    40. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      if you shutdown all the useless services, and misc crap, xp can run fine in 128

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    41. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      What's a Linmodem?

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    42. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by provolt · · Score: 1

      (-1, Doesn't get the joke)

    43. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      What's a Linmodem?

      Click here to ruin the joke.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    44. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      That is the joke. It's called "dry humor." In this case, very, very dry humor.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    45. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      Windows XP and 2000 can both run fine on 128 megs

      ROFL!

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    46. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Even if I were to conceed that the speeds are the same with ubuntu and windows XP, you are still forgetting that fact that windows costs $250 more than ubuntu retail. If I could get compareable speed for a savings of $250 I would probably take that bargin.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    47. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      And usually it sets it up wrong, so the OS has to set it all up anyway. :)

      LinuxBIOS boots so fast because it doesn't bother to do anything to the BIOS; Linux will do that when it's executed.

      --
      My other car is first.
    48. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      Some Compaq Deskpros are like this. They keep part of the BIOS on the hard disk. Once you throw a Linux install on them, it overwrites the BIOS sector on the hard drive and it is quite a pain to reinstall as you can no longer get into whatever bits of bios remain. Wasn't a problem till boot images started getting too big for a floppy a-la FC2 and 3.

    49. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't hit swap half as much as you are characterizing

      Then you obviously don't know how to use a computer. (what do you use, 1 program at a time??) That or you can't tell when it's using the swap...

    50. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by typhoonius · · Score: 1

      Informative? WinXP _sucks_ with 128 MB of memory. It is really, really bad. There is nothing fine about it.

      I'm running Windows XP with 128 MB of RAM right now (because the only SDRAM I have here is apparently too dense for this mobo), and it's very snappy, even with Firefox and Winamp running. This is from the perspective of someone whose primary machine is a 3 GHz P4 with the 800 MHz FSB and 1 GB of DDR400 RAM (dual-booting XP and FreeBSD 5.3). The only time the paging gets ridiculous is when I run Photoshop (all of my good computers are at college, so I have to do insane things like that occasionally when I'm home). Here's my MSInfo file, even (in case you want to see what processes or services I have running or just want to harvest my MAC addresses, heh).

      I was running it with 64 MB over the summer, and it was still usable enough for the summer courses I was taking and the occasional web design project (although I had to use Opera instead of my beloved Firefox, and it did page out a lot when switching apps). No lie.

      Windows XP is the best NT if stripped down properly. You can say a lot of things about it, but it isn't slow. There are plenty of benchmarks online (here's one) that demonstrate this. I can't think of any reason to use Windows 2000 instead of Windows XP if you have the choice.

      I'd be more worried about that crappy VIA processor than the memory if I were trying to put Windows on this lappy.

    51. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at Walmart you can get a machine with Windows XP for only $50 more. And it's better specced.

      Can you say 'subsidised'?

    52. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      Which is fine until he wants to run that program that his friend at the golf course told him about, and you have to tell him he can't run it because he's on a "superior" operating system...

    53. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      He's used to having computers that won't run modern software -- the one I'm replacing for him is a bottom-end Pentium; his spare is an IBM PS/1. The Pentium died on account of spyware and virii (he was hitting the porn sites and not being very careful about ActiveX controls and such); this way, I can give him something that he can't easily break.

      Since I'm only visiting about 2x/year, and I'm the only tech support he's got, "won't break" is more important than "runs mainstream software".

    54. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by jbarr · · Score: 1

      I have a 300MHz Dell laptop with 128MB RAM, running Windows XP Pro, with a W-Fi card, and it performs just fine for Web browsing and such.

      Bootup takes way, way too long, so I use Windows' "Hibernate" feature which has proven to be a Godsend. Windows XP finally got Hibernate right--coming out of Hibernate far, far less time than it takes to boot normally making this "obsolete" laptop worth much more than I ever anticipated.

      The kicker is that I tried quite a number of Linux distros, but I had horrible problems with WiFi compatibility. But once finally I got that solved, I realized that it still took forever to both boot and shutdown--something I really hate with laptops. I need fast startups and shutdowns, and Windows XP's Hibernate clinched the deal for me. When Linux gets a decent Hibernate function build-into the distro without having to jump through install and configuration hoops, I'll definitely give it another look, but until then, I'm staying with XP Pro...

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    55. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it's great if you have enough gravy on top!

    56. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by ckotchey · · Score: 1

      That's all fine and well until they go down to Circuit City to buy a new printer and discover that they won't be able to get it to work.

    57. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Tells bad Joke and then tries to explain it. (-1, Sad)

    58. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by cduffy · · Score: 1

      If he bought new hardware for himself, I wouldn't be giving him this hand-me-down in the first place.

    59. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it's so un-cool to point out that XP works better with 128MB than OSS desktops!

    60. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by zeylisse · · Score: 1

      There are only a few poorly done desktop replacements for explorer.exe IMO.

      Agreed. But you dont need few or more, you need just *one* appropriate replacement. I replaced explorer.exe with xoblite, and it works fine. It also helps my w2k box with only 128 MB ;)

    61. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I might give that a try. The only thing I don't like about BB is the menu support. I don't feel like manually recreating the menu structure I have for all my apps.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    62. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and for the other way around its not important?

    63. Re:What everyone wants to know.. by falsified · · Score: 1

      What? I dual boot Linux and XP. I should always be able to do that, or just have Linux, or just have XP. If hardware is modified so that can't happen, that's wrong.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
  7. Not bad by maxchaote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not a bad value for those of us who do low-intensity work like back-end web development and don't have huge libraries of MP3s.

    1. Re:Not bad by rbochan · · Score: 1

      Not a bad value for those of us who do low-intensity work like back-end web development and don't have huge libraries of MP3s.

      ...or the need for network connectivity :o/

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    2. Re:Not bad by rainman_bc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmm, don't know about you, but as a web developer, sometimes I'm called upon to do some photoshop work - hardly waht I'd call low-intensity...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad value for those of us who do low-intensity work like back-end web development and don't have huge libraries of MP3s.

      Actually, with a 30 gig hard drive it could be useful as an mp3 jukebox.

    4. Re:Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, the hardware isn't bad. The distro, on the other hand, is a disgrace.

    5. Re:Not bad by FLEB · · Score: 1

      "Back-end"

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    6. Re:Not bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That my friend is sexual harassment!

    7. Re:Not bad by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      But would you want to run Openoffice on that beast with 128 megs of ram and a processor about as fast as a pentium pro?

      I think not.

    8. Re:Not bad by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Bum... Oh! What a giveaway!

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  8. Plain AND Vanilla! by JDRipper · · Score: 3, Funny

    "and a plain vanilla CD-ROM" Wow! Both plain AND vanilla! Walmart to the T!

    --
    "You know Myra, some people might think you're cute. But me, I think you're one very large baked potato."
    1. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by jm92956n · · Score: 1
      Specifications are equally ambiguous:

      14.1" LCD panel: I would assume it's a TFT, as every laptop I've seen manufactured in the past few years has had one, but at this price point, that's questionable. Might it use dual-scan technology instead?

      4 cell battery: Four cells is low as it is, especially if it's not a lithium-ion battery.

      I'd like to believe they cut corners only on the memory and on the processor, but at such a low price I'm wondering what else they had to leave out (not to mention the dubious MS tax, of course).

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    2. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny
      I really object to the use of the phrase "plain vanilla". Vanilla is very tasty, and is not at all plain. If you doubt it, try making some homemade ice cream without vanilla some time.

      Eddys (known in other markets as Dreyers) used to offer a double vanilla ice cream. Yum!

    3. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I really object to the use of the phrase "plain vanilla".

      Me too. Though French.. err.. Freedom Vanilla is good too.

    4. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by lubricated · · Score: 2

      and if you want it real good make ice cream with real vanilla beans.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    5. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Now you made me hungry. Thank you very much!

      *stomps off to the freezer for Phish Food Ice Cream*

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    6. Re:Plain AND Vanilla! by magarity · · Score: 1

      Four cells is low as it is, especially if it's not a lithium-ion battery

      With which the thing runs "more than 1.5 hours". What the heck... If you're going to use a chip with low power requirements like the C3 isn't it pretty absurd to lash it to a minuscule battery? With a normal battery this thing would run all day and actually be worth it.

  9. Wow, $500... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $500 is great and all, but does it run... uh, nevermind.

  10. Windows by jerichohol · · Score: 0

    Can It run on Windows and Internet Explorer. I need them to access my banks website

    1. Re:Windows by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      My bank supports Mozilla and Firefox.

      www.berkshirebank.com

      Maybe it's time you switched banks?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      If you shop at Wal-Mart why do need a bank?

      How 'bout using the liquor store with the big sign "We Cash Checks".

  11. Notebooks for $500.00? by temprand · · Score: 1

    I realize that Wal-Mart is trying to reach the lower end of the market, but what about a good copy of Slackware and an Ebay bargain? Something tells me that a.) you will get a better installation (you will do it yourself and b.) there will be a little more horsepower for your buck with that purchase from Ebay. Just my $0.02, as that's what I did.

    1. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get top-flight support from Linspire plus an excellent distro like Linspire from your non-Linspire based eBay special? I don't think so.

      With this you get premier Linspire Linux and excellect support if you need it.

    2. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by aoe2bug · · Score: 0

      since he mentioned it, here:

      http://search.ebay.com/laptop

      --
      -Dan
    3. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by jm92956n · · Score: 1

      there will be a little more horsepower for your buck with that purchase from Ebay.

      This notebook, however, has a full year warranty: hardly impressive, but relative to eBay's usual "no returns unless DOA," it's rather nice. Not to mention it probably hasn't been kicked around, dropped repeatedly, or left in a hot trunk for a few days. Notebooks are inherently mistreated and abused. I don't think Average Jane wants a used notebook.

      And as nice of a distro as Slack is, it's still more difficult for the typical person migrating from an MS OS to learn than Linspire. There's definitely a nice market for this machine.

      Not that I'll ever purchase anything from evil WalMart, though.

      --
      An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    4. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by mikejz84 · · Score: 1

      I remember Dell running a special for a $500 Laptop, not sure of the specs--but atleast it came with Windows. On the other hand I have a Laptop that I got at a garage sale--Its a 233Mhz, 4 Gig HD, and Runs Windows 2000 like a car running on fumes. That said I paid $20 so I am more than happy with it. I run it as a experimental web server and it runs like a champ!.

    5. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're buying a computer from Wal-Mart odds are you do not know how to install windows. You probably don't even know how to turn the thing on. You probabably do know how to skin a deer, and you probably own a t-shirt that says "Who Farted?"

    6. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      Alright, every single time a retail store offers a computer, a comment is posted about how you can get it cheaper on Ebay.

      Ebay is almost always cheaper. Sellers have less overhead and don't have to worry about a lot of the crap retail stores have to.

      People buy computers in retail stores so they can fiddle with it before they buy it. If it breaks, they at least can bring it back to the store and bitch to someone in person. It's also more convient to drive to Walmart and pick one up than waiting a week or so. I think this week of the year shows that the most.

      My two cents.

    7. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ^ I'm with stupid.

    8. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Not really worth buying used off Ebay. A brand new low-end Dell can be had for $599 (look at today's techbargains.com), and it's still faster than any 2 year old used laptop. However, a used one off Ebay would still be better than this C3 1Ghz.

    9. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If you're buying a computer from Wal-Mart odds are you do not know how to install windows. You probably don't even know how to turn the thing on. You probabably do know how to skin a deer, and you probably own a t-shirt that says "Who Farted?"

      I would buy a computer from Wal-Mart if the price was right and in addition to knowing how to install Windows and linux, I can also skin a deer. I have even skinned a cat. And yes, there is more than one way.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Ebay is almost always cheaper. Sellers have less overhead and don't have to worry about a lot of the crap retail stores have to.

      What kind of warranty does a typical computer listed on eBay come with?

    11. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe my t-shirt reads:

      Hoof Arted.

      Please get it right.

    12. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you're buying a computer from Wal-Mart odds are you do not know how to install windows."

      (I look at the 5 desktops with Windows on them, all built up.)

      I think if you haven't bought or at least considered a computer or parts from Walmart or similar, you don't push your machines. Or your a damn good planner (and I plan 2 months ahead of time for parts and supplies). I'm a small operation and I've had machines die, spares taken up, replacements on order, and gone to Walmart at 4am to pick up a "just in case" or "take up the slack" box. They work sufficiently.

      "You probably don't even know how to turn the thing on."

      I don't want to turn computers on but I know I do. Turning computers on, well, that may be your purpose in life, but I have girlfriends to dalliance with.

      Oh, that sort of on...right. Well, given 90% of my computers and 100% of my hubs and switches are on remote reboot systems, I think I do. Prefer network, phone line will work too. Trivial. Big whoop. Yeah, I can do that index finger to the power button too. Yeah, I know, wow...

      "You probabably do know how to skin a deer"

      Nope. Never tried. Seemed rather trivial to do. Harder to do, at least, than using that power button thingie.

      "and you probably own a t-shirt that says "Who Farted?""

      Nope. I do have a hat with a newsgroup on it though. But that's okay. You're a bigger geek than I am for it, aren't yah?

    13. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how to skin a deer.
      I own a T shirt that says 'Normal'
      I write device drivers.

      I would not buy a computer from MallWart......

    14. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal-Mart brick and mortar does not equal walmart.com.
      Joe Sixpack comes to Wal-Mart, not walmart.com.

    15. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Hoof Hearted looks better.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    16. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      That's exactly my point. A quote from ebay will always be less than a quote from a retail store so it's irrelevant.

    17. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about this the other day. I do occasionally shop at Wal-Mart, although not for computers. This past weekend I noticed they had an HP and a 17" CRT for $468.
      Specs were:

      2.93GHz Celeron
      256MB RAM (crappily shared with video of course)
      40GB hard drive
      CDR

      Ok so now before you flame about how the Celeron sucks and video is crap etc. I build my own computers and can't point out all the "suck" parts of this one BUT lets say you run office type apps and browse the Internet. Wouldn't this computer work fine for those tasks?
      I mean it's not like an Nvidia 6800 Ultra is going to make Word run better. And this whole computer with monitor is less than the cost of that Ultra.
      It'll run top Wal-Mart sellers, the Sims (version 1) and Rollercoaster Tycoon (version 1 and 2) just fine as well.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    18. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya . Be nice to change all the boot splash's to the windows one.

    19. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Yes... but since this laptop doesn't play ANY of the revisions of the "Deer Hunter" game, it's a non-starter.

    20. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by tepples · · Score: 1

      For somebody considering an eBay purchase, it's entirely relevant. Like Best Buy, some eBay sellers offer warranties on their products for an additional charge. Have you tried e-mailing a seller to see how much he or she charges for a 12 month warranty against defects? If buying a PC on eBay plus buying the warranty from the seller is cheaper than buying a PC at retail, then eBay is most decidedly an option.

    21. Re:Notebooks for $500.00? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Obviously someone who has no real grasp of the reality of the situation.

      While many of Wal-Marts customers are indeed that crowd, many are also uppercrust.

      There is a new trend among America's wealthy now, and that is to be frugal with things that aren't of much importance to them. They'll splurge on their car and house, but when it comes to cleaning supplies? Wal-Mart.

      I suggest you read a book called Affluenza.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  12. Misleading Picture by ian+rogers · · Score: 0

    In this picture of the product, it appears to have a DVD drive.

  13. Imagine a beowulf..... by ARRRLovin · · Score: 1

    ...yada yada yada!

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf..... by DarkMantle · · Score: 1

      A beowulf of crap is just a bigger pile of crap.

      Face it, if you strip the cost of windows xp home off of This computer It's only about 800 CAD, that's gotta be aroun $700 US, and it comes with a DVD burner.

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    2. Re:Imagine a beowulf..... by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
      if you strip the cost of windows xp home off of This computer It's only about 800 CAD

      The computer lists for $1000 CAD. Windows XP home OEM is somewhere in the $50 range. And the laptop you point to is much better than the $500 one in the article.

      --


      This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  14. Thinkpad Killer! by Zemplar · · Score: 1

    Now that IBM will no longer be making the wonderful Thinkpads, Wal-Mart has sprung this piece of quality upon the market.

    1. Re:Thinkpad Killer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when has IBM decided to stop making Thinkpads? www.thinkpad.com is up and well

    2. Re:Thinkpad Killer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      within the past couple of weeks. They sold the operation to a Chinese company. They can use the Thinkpad name for the next five years IIRC.

    3. Re:Thinkpad Killer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Lenovo will keep making PCs and ThinkPads with the IBM name for at least 5 years.

      Also, people who spend the extra $$$ on ThinkPads do it for the performance, quality and solid construction. Somehow I don't think this Wal-Mart PC will compete on any of those factors.

  15. But.... by dschnur · · Score: 1

    It's from Wal-Mart...

    Always...

    Gotta love the cult of Wal-mart...

    Ok, it run's linux, one good quality.

    It's the cheapest new laptop you can buy...

    Probably no quality.

    Better to save and get a good computer that will last and be able to choose your own distro.

    -D

    1. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ok, it run's linux, one good quality."

      Funny, I thought it ran Linspire.

  16. I wonder if they include a disclamer... by wcitechnologies · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if they include a disclamer for Linspire... a big red "DOES NOT INCLUDE MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP" on the box somewhere.

    I'd almost wager that 80% of the people who buy these (or who buy a computer from WalMart in general) are n00bs, and will try returning the devices because 'there's no microsoft word or internet explorer on it'.

    --
    Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    1. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd almost wager that 80% of the people who buy these (or who buy a computer from WalMart in general) are n00bs, and will try returning the devices because 'there's no microsoft word or internet explorer on it'.

      Actually, put a 'W' icon linking to Openoffice or AmiWord and a 'E' 'Internet' icon pointing to Firefox and I bet they wouldn't know the difference.

    2. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by procrastitron · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if a "n00b" would care about internet explorer. Someone that really has no experience with computers would not have any commitment to IE, so they should not ever miss it. Especially when most people seem to consider Firefox as being far superior to it.

    3. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by bm17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I were I teenager and my parents got me this computer, I would be plenty pissed off. If not immediately, then as soon as I tried to buy gaming software for it.

    4. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      But then, as a teenager, you discover you have the same unlimited access to porn, and are then satisifed...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      "Word", maybe, but "Internet Explorer"? Nobody I know who's insufficiently savvy to identify Linspire as not being windows cares about "Internet Explorer" -- they just want "The Internet".

    6. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but it DOES include bits and pieces of the Chinese slaves they used to make the laptops.

      So the Karma all evens out really.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    7. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you mean AbiWord not AmiPro. You couldnt pay me to use AmiPro....

    8. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by SoCalChris · · Score: 3, Funny

      If I were I teenager and my parents got me this computer, I would be plenty pissed off. If not immediately, then as soon as I tried to buy gaming software for it.

      And if I were your parent, I'd smack your dumb, ingrateful ass around for bitching about the laptop that I just bought you with my hard earned money.

      Then I'd make your lazy ass go get a job and buy your own.

    9. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you young whipper snappers are so goddam spoiled. oh, your parents get you a computer as a gift -- the pinnacle of thousands of years of math, physics, and engineering -- and you're disappointed because it wasn't fancy enough. you should be lucky your parents don't make you work to earn your holiday gifts. and on top of that, do you know how hard we had to work in my day just to get a peek at naked young girls? you lazy bastards and your internet have it all fall in your laps. we had to smuggle dirty mags all the way from amsterdam or paris to see the good stuff, and you're just a friggin mouse click away. and back in high school we had to find hiding spots in the girls locker room, if anything like a wireless cam existed we would have shit our pants all the way to liquor store. you could get your balls twisted off when you were discovered peeping by an angry big girl back then. damn kids, you're living in the lap of luxury and you don't appreciate it. omfg

    10. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by bm17 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You just don't undersand! You're not the boss of me! I hate you I hate you I hate you!!!

    11. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Y0tsuya · · Score: 1
      No, it will be a problem only if the computer:

      1) "doesn't have internet on it", or
      2) "doesn't run the internet", or
      3) "doesn't have email", or
      ... yada yada yada ....
      etc

    12. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Mooooooooooooooom! You're so unfaiiir! Everyone else has a brand new iMaaaaaaac, Geeeeeze!"

      **bee boop beep boop boop be doo***

      "Hold on, phone call!"

      "Oh, hi Scott! Yah-huh! Yah-huh! Heeeeheehehehehe. Yah-huh! Yah-huh! heheeeehhhee!"

    13. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      the pinnacle of thousands of years of math, physics, and engineering

      Excuse me for nitpicking, but physics hasn't been around for a thousand years, much less thousands of years... but then, maybe that explains the rest of the post better.

    14. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by bob65 · · Score: 1
      And if I were your parent, I'd smack your dumb, ingrateful ass around for bitching about the laptop that I just bought you with my hard earned money.

      And then I'd smack you back because it's not the cost of the laptop that I'm ungrateful for, it's the fact that I would get something better for the same hard earned money.

    15. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The foundations of chemistry and physics existed in early Greece -- crude by our standards now, of course, but existed nevertheless. Algebra came from Arab culture, ancient Egypt/Babylon and not to mention the advances in math and physics in ancient China -- which westerners like to ignore, of course, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    16. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by westlake · · Score: 1

      The cheapest Windows laptop sold off Walmart.com sells for $548, with a 40 GB HDD, DVD-ROM and interated 802.11b wireless networking.

    17. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given that he said "AbiWord" I think he meant AbiWord. Did you wake up today and say "I just have to post something. I just have to post something"

    18. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said "slaves" being not only willing to work such "slavery", but also very happy making laptops at 10US$/week, as compared to growing rice for one. Dollar. A week.

      In fact, It's the guys on your side who seem to be losing all their jobs.

    19. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by nuggetman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Need I remind you the last kid that asked for an iMac wound up with his dad designing the "HipE"

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    20. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by powermung · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think Walmart would be happy to sell them a copy of Windows XP and Microsoft Office should the customers want them, and true newbies would buy them.

    21. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Calm down dude.

    22. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Read it again. He posted amiWord.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    23. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was that from Dell?

    24. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Agreed

      My old man got my a used 286 close to a decade ago when he had the nice 486DX2. My friends made fun of me.

      Did I complain?

      No. I just kept using my fathers for games and hacked my 286 to run AOL for dos so I could go on the net. (shudder)

      I learned Borland TurboC/C++ on it and connected to some BBS's as a terminal so I found some use for it. ..... and saved money to upgrade it to a 486. :-)

      But I found out the best was as a teenager ready to go to college was to convince my father a nice pentium would be cool for the office and I took the 486 for my own use when he had no need for it. :-)

      Now that is smart thinking.

    25. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      You can do alot with it and its a good thing. Why?

      Instead of playing video games perhaps learning how to hack Linux, learn to code, and do something like.... gasp.. work, you can do alot with it.

    26. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      undersand!

      And do your damn homework!

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    27. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Technician · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they include a disclamer for Linspire... a big red "DOES NOT INCLUDE MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP" on the box somewhere.


      I doubt it. They don't tout the software that does come with it in any good terms except saying it is compatible with the MS products.

      The copy mentions MS office by name for compatibility reason, but fail to even mention what the software suite is. They do not mention manufacture, model, or version. Who the heck advertises a software package listing it's features (ouptuts PDF's etc) and does not even bother to name the product? They have a long way to go.

      I wish they listed it as having Firefox, Open Office, Thunderbird, etc and listing their compatiblilites and security. (I'm only guessing on installed applications.. They are not telling.)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    28. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by Henk+Poley · · Score: 1

      I didn't know what it was, so Googled for it. It is produced by the "Digital Lifestyles Group", apparently the same who also made the more-or-less famous I-Opener

      Als see: http://www.hip-e.com/

    29. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Ok! Yah-huh! Yah-huh! Heheeehhehehee!

    30. Re:I wonder if they include a disclamer... by brw12 · · Score: 1
      put a ... 'E' 'Internet' icon pointing to Firefox and I bet they wouldn't know the difference.

      That's what I do with Firefox at the high school computer lab where I work... put a link on the desktop, rename it "Internet Explorer", and change its icon to IE's. Works like a charm, and no spyware!

  17. Microsoft and Walmart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two companies who have no friends.

    I wonder why?

    1. Re:Microsoft and Walmart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is because neither cares if they have friends. They have customers. To a company, customers are infinitely more important than friends.

    2. Re:Microsoft and Walmart. by westlake · · Score: 2, Funny
      It is because neither cares if they have friends. They have customers. To a company, customers are infinitely more important than friends.

      a pity to post this as an A,C,. because it deserves to be modded up.

  18. Excellent way to reach out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It's not so much the people who buy this from Wal-Mart who we need to reach out to, but rather, the people who steal it from them. People who buy from Wal-Mart are generally poor and live in areas with a lot of black people, so when the black people steal these laptops, they'll be introduced to the wonders of Linux! This is what I call bridging the technology gap. Good to see some much deserved benevolence from corporate America, for once!

  19. Is it just me? by Spackler · · Score: 1


    I really seem to have a thing against having linux on a machine, but then I need to go download each part that should be on the distribution CDs.

    Sorry Linspire, but I am UNinspired by your install model.


    1. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      force must you use to get desired opportunity.
      Seperate each download part and assemble build each together.

      Linux on machine is buttered bread in the kitchen oven no mit on my hand it burned.

      I have no idea what your post said, but I hope this answers your question.

    2. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Just edit /etc/apt/source.list accordingly and you instantly have a Debian box.
    3. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you Andy Rooney

    4. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Linspire, but I am UNinspired by your install model.

      Ha ha ha ha! Aaaa... ha ha ha!

      This guy's a genius. Do you see what he's done... he's taken the 'inspire' from 'Linspire' and cleverly turned it round to show how UNinspired he is by their install model. *chortle*

      A long career in comedy awaits.

  20. Call me when... by jacobcaz · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...I can pick up a dozen laptops for under $500 along with my gallon of pickles for $2.97.

    Seriously, I feel bad for whoever is putting these together for WalMart. They just got a hugenormous client (WalMart) who will be both the best and worst thing that ever happened to them.

    Where I work we split our time between trying to provide excellent service to our non-WalMart customers while keeping WalMart happy because they account for such a huge chunk of our revenue it's not even funny. And that's pretty normal for any company WalMart does business with.

    1. Re:Call me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I work for, Linspire, is putting these together for Walmart. We are essentially taking over the desktop linux market. Don't feel sorry for us. We know what we are doing and the profits have been huge.

    2. Re:Call me when... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      > The company I work for, Linspire, is putting these together for Walmart.
      > We are essentially taking over the desktop linux market. Don't feel
      > sorry for us. We know what we are doing and the profits have been huge.

      In your unbiased opinion, right? :-)

      At the moment that's rather like taking over a town with a population of nine.

      All the power to you, of course, but if these boxes stink, then they're going to do the Linux desktop market, fledgling as it is, a major amount of damage.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Call me when... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ya, Walmart likes to tell their suppliers how it's going to be. It's caused some suppliers to say screw you. Rainbird dprinklers got tired of Walmart playing games with them and dropped them as a distributor.

    4. Re:Call me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Cool, we'll see how you feel next year after hellmart tells you you have to cut prices by 20% or they will drop you. This is right after you will have put a huge investment in scaling up production for your biggest customer. Then you can either lose money from each sale and go bankrupt, or go bankrupt because you can't pay for that huge scaleup you made since you just lost your biggest customer (typical hellmart scenario)

    5. Re:Call me when... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Rainbird dprinklers ('sprinklers'?) got tired of Walmart playing games with them and dropped them as a distributor.

      Good for them; but how did they get out of the corner they'd presumably got themselves into; i.e. (as described in a sibling message) they scale up production to sell to Wal-Mart, but *have* to sell to Wal-Mart to pay off the investment in that production. Maybe they were very clever, I'd like to hear.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Call me when... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

      They managed their finances such as not to do this. From the sounds of it, most of their bussiness from Walmart simply went to other home improvement stores, namely Ace and Home Depot.

    7. Re:Call me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I'm sure that guy doesn't actually work for Linspire, since Linspire doesn't make computers - they sell a Linux distro. He's just yanking your chain.

      Even if Walmart asked Linspire to give away the OS for free to reduce the price of the laptop, they still make money off their CNR subscription thing. The one who'll get squeezed is the guy who makes the hardware.

    8. Re:Call me when... by John+M+Ford · · Score: 1
      From your link
      Young remembers begging Wal-Mart for relief. "They said, 'No way,' " says Young. "We said we'll increase the price"--even $3.49 would have helped tremendously--"and they said, 'If you do that, all the other products of yours we buy, we'll stop buying.' It was a clear threat." Hunn recalls things a little differently, if just as ominously: "They said, 'We want the $2.97 gallon of pickles. If you don't do it, we'll see if someone else might.' I knew our competitors were saying to Wal-Mart, 'We'll do the $2.97 gallons if you give us your other business.' " Wal-Mart's business was so indispensable to Vlasic, and the gallon so central to the Wal-Mart relationship, that decisions about the future of the gallon were made at the CEO level.

      Why should I feel sorry for a company (Vlasic) that made a business decision. If they didn't, their competetors would. Isn't that the way it is suppose to work? Decide to do business with WalMart or not. But I find it hard to feel sorry for companies like this who suddenly find themselves with more sales than they know what to do with.

      If you don't want to sell pickles for $2.97, don't.

      John
      --
      I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. jya.com/ap.htm
    9. Re:Call me when... by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      hahahahaha
      you are an idiot

    10. Re:Call me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where I work we split our time between trying to provide excellent service to our non-WalMart customers while keeping WalMart happy because they account for such a huge chunk of our revenue it's not even funny. And that's pretty normal for any company WalMart does business with.

      Then why don't you quit whining and stop doing business with them if they are such a pain in the ass.

  21. Contrast by StevenHenderson · · Score: 1


    Seems to be a stark contrast to what WalMart can really do. They buy in such great volumes, you'd think they could negotiate a price/feautre point that would make it more appealing to the masses. Guess they are just testing the (ingorance of) the waters...

  22. low spec? by rkww · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has a faster processor, bigger disk and more RAM than a standard PC from three years ago; what applications have turned up since then that require more than this?

    1. Re:low spec? by jubei · · Score: 2, Informative

      A 1Ghz C3 is probably equivalent to a PII-450, which is starting to get a bit old.

      That being said, I wouldn't mind one, as long as the ram is upgradable.

    2. Re:low spec? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      They wanted a 3-d card inside and DVD-RW... Considering laptops are built as 'throw away' technology anyways, The $500 isn't too bad a deal as long as the drives can be swapped out. Unless you have the cash and connections to get Millitary ruggedness certified equipment anyways -- I say connections because we're in a war, and they're all on backorder everywhere I've looked.
      People wait 8 hours outside a stinking retail store to get a $500 laptop on day after sales, only to find out the employees beat you to the punch.. Time will tell if this $500 laptop is going to do well.

    3. Re:low spec? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I generally agree with you, but 3 years ago (late 2001) a standart pc was a athlon 1.2, 256MB pc133 ram and a 60GB hd.
      Time flys by faster than you think...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:low spec? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I think most people would find my laptop faster that I bought from ebay. 500 mhz, 320 megs of ram.

    5. Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows XP.

      Oh, wait.

    6. Re:low spec? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      My primary computer is a PII-450. I've got no complaints.

    7. Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, my Via C3 1Ghz - 512Mb Ram - 200GB HD is only about 6 months old.

      And I wouldn't call an Athlon system standard today, let alone 3 years ago. Once they get cheap enough, sure, but not yet.

      Thats the great thing about Microsoft, they write bloated software that forces their customers to go out and buy damn near supercomputer class machines just to run a word processor or a card game, thereby driving down the prices on hardware, especially "slow" hardware that be painful running windows. Great deal for the rest of us!

      I can't wait until Longhorn comes out! Imagine how cheap a good *Nix workstation will be then!

    8. Re:low spec? by Rysc · · Score: 1

      My computer until three months ago was a PII-350. I had no complaints, except that mozilla rendered some pages slowly.

      I upgraded for one reason only: Doom 3. Hail id, baby.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    9. Re:low spec? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      This has a faster processor, bigger disk and more RAM than a standard PC from three years ago; what applications have turned up since then that require more than this?

      Windows Media Player?

      This is not ment as a flame, but I question whether this laptop would be adquate to play anything above and beyond mpeg-2. From my understanding the 1GHz VIA C3 peforms much like a medium speed pentium III and I found that a pentium III 766 was barely adquate for some divx-4 and xvid encodes.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    10. Re:low spec? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Closer to a PIII@600MHz, not that it matters.

    11. Re:low spec? by alphaseven · · Score: 1
      This has a faster processor, bigger disk and more RAM than a standard PC from three years ago; what applications have turned up since then that require more than this?

      DIVX video is pretty processor dependant and some newer videos are pretty much unwatchable on older machines. But there are a lot of people out there that are happy with slower machines, that's why the average price of a new pc has been declining.

    12. Re:low spec? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      WTF?
      Your joking, right?

      A C3 1GHz with 512MB/200GB is like a ferrari with a 500W electro motor, plus a athlon today not standart? its already OUTDATED....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    13. Re:low spec? by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 1

      Um...I have a P3 500 MHz on a 100 MHz bus with 256MB's of RAM that I use as a HTPC. It plays XviD, DivX, and DVD's with Windows XP and WIndows Media player. It plays just fine. The DivX files are DVD resolution by the way. Although I wouldn't be able to do anything else on it at the same time, it works great.

      If you have software that takes advantage of SSE2 and so forth, I don't see why you need a GHz and up CPU for just media playback. Now it's probably too slow to ever record anything, but I don't need it to do that anyways.

      People always have this pre-conceived notion that you need a GHz+ CPU to do anything useful and I think that is just hogwash.

      In other words, if you need at least a PIII 766 for these files, either you haven't got the PC setup properly, or the software isn't up to snuff.

      --
      >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
    14. Re:low spec? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the feedback. The leap between the Pentium III 500 and 766 isn't all that much, except I believe the 500 was a Secc2 with 512k of cache. In fact the only reason I bought a 766 was my 500 blew and it was cheaper than a replacement 500 at the time. I'm willing to believe that a 500 would also be barely adquate to playback mpeg-4 encodes. By this I mean what you said, play the video but jack shit running in the background.

      I don't believe one needs a GHz+ cpu to decode videos, I simply don't know if the 1GHz VIA C3 would be up to snuff.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    15. Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 1 GHz C3 is probably socketed; with a bit of elbow grease, you can put in an FCPGA Coppermine PIII/Celeron, or maybe even a Tualatin Celeron 1.2/1.4. This will easily double the performance of the base machine.

    16. Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNOME, KDE.. both require more RAM and processor than WalMart gives. At least if you're comparing with Windows. You need at LEAST an Athlon 1700+ to run linux graphically, and 512MB is sufficient. I pity the fools running less than that, and saying "Gentoo is so fast!" while they crawl along with Blackbox/IceWM/whatever and wait an hour for the GUI to respond.

    17. Re:low spec? by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      Actually my old Athlon 650 could play divx with mplayer/Linux just fine.

      In Windows/WMP it worked in a window fine, but skipped in fullscreen.

      I guess the VIA will be roughly comparable, so it should be able to handle it (at least under Linux, so I guess you are right with the WMP-comment)

    18. Re:low spec? by everdave · · Score: 1

      I have a Celery 500 with 256 win 98 and on board graphics and I can play any format i have ever downloaded fine and watch full movies in Divx and XVID without crashing in the new WMP. so what the hell are you talking about?

      --
      Elliott Smith Tribute CD available now on Double D Records! Visit www.doubledrecords.com to order.
    19. Re:low spec? by julesh · · Score: 1

      I have a Celery 500 with 256 win 98 and on board graphics and I can play any format i have ever downloaded fine and watch full movies in Divx and XVID without crashing in the new WMP. so what the hell are you talking about?

      My similar machine sometimes has trouble with DVD resolution MPEG-2s. What codecs are you using?

    20. Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For int ops it may be like a 600MHz PIII, but not for float ops.

    21. Re:low spec? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      VIA Antaur has hardware support for MPEG decoding. Yes, a 1GHz VIA C3 plays MPEG-4 just fine.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  23. Incredible by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So a cheap, but overpriced and underperforming laptop deserve the frontpage because it run Linux? Or maybe its cause its sold at Walmart? I don't get the point... Where are the news for nerds, you know, stuff that matters?

    1. Re:Incredible by chrisopherpace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1.) It is cheap- under $500. This is rare. 2.) It runs Linux. Yes, believe it or not, this site does lean towards OSS and *NIX.

  24. The picture by jonfields · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did anyone else notice that it says "DVD" on it?

    1. Re:The picture by Bloater · · Score: 1

      This too:

      > Complete music management with Lsongs to import, organize, play and burn CDs of your favorite music Networking PCs and Printers: Share files and printers between Linspire OS and Microsoft Windows systems Plug-n-Play peripheral support

      If this were in the UK, it would have to have a cd-burner (or it wouldn't have complete music management such that you can burn CDs)

  25. Please don't make me... by dnaboy · · Score: 1

    imagine a beowolf cluster of these

    1. Re:Please don't make me... by clem · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of (-1 Redundant).

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  26. It has a DVD drive by inotocracy · · Score: 0

    You can clearly see the "DVD" label on the drive in the picture.

  27. Not too shabby. by ssand · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep in mind this is a notebook, and not a desktop. One for that price really isn't too bad, and would be excellent for someone doing basic computer usage. The biggest issue I see is that it is not windows. That's no big deal, however it can be for those who are not tech savy. With the draconian return policies of software, I can see unsavy users buying software thinking it will run, and finding out they can't.

    1. Re:Not too shabby. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Crossover Office, a customized version of Wine, is capable of running all sorts of Windows-x86 programs on GNU/Linux-x86. If you want games, get an authentic Nintendo, not a knockoff Wintendo.

    2. Re:Not too shabby. by Bloater · · Score: 1

      That's okay, most Windows software promises that your supplier will refund you if you don't agree to the license... So you refuse to agree to any license on it once you've found out it doesn't work, and return it.

  28. Not awesome? by StevenMaurer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about the author, but I remember the days when twin pentium 90's and 128 Megs of RAM were considered awesome....

    That was about 10 years ago.

    Sure, this thing isn't going to be a screaming game machine, but honestly, how much horsepower do you need for text editing, email, and some casual browsing, anyway?

    1. Re:Not awesome? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Even more to the point, what's the battery life on a VIA C3 going to be like compared to a P4? For anything I do with a laptop, this would actually be far superior to its more power-hungry brethren.

      Its specs mention a 1.5 hour battery lifetime. How's that compare to other recent laptops?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Not awesome? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Its specs mention a 1.5 hour battery lifetime. How's that compare to other recent laptops?

      Pretty bad.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Not awesome? by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      My PowerBook is lasting about that now and I considering this battery to be shot. I need a new one.

      Most laptop manufacturers claim a battery life of between 5-7 hours. It's never nearly that much. Imagine how bad the battery must be if they claim 1.5 hours.

    4. Re:Not awesome? by damiam · · Score: 1

      My iBook got about 4 hours, generally. Can't speak for x86s, but 1.5 hours is pretty crappy.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Not awesome? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Informative

      1.5 hours is embarrassing. A VIA C3 1Ghz is about 12W. A Pentium M mobile is about 14W. And a P4 is perhaps 50W.

      This laptop has the right cpu for long battery life. I suspect it has useless batteries in it. And does not have that many power friendly peripherals.

      Apple 1GHz G4 laptop gets about 4.5 hours on a charge. But they have an 8 cell(i think) li-ion pack. As if the number of cells means anything. (Did Walmart print the mAh of their battery pack?). For twice the price you get 10x the laptop.

      P4 laptops go about 2.5 hours on their batteries, typically. (intel's speedstep power management helps dramatically). And Pentium M laptops go 5-6 hours on a charge.

      Really you can pay $200 more for a laptop that goes three times as fast and lasts twice as long. Or pay double and get something that lasts 4 times as long. I really don't see any advantage to buying this laptop. A used celeron laptop would probably be a better deal if you absolutely can't spend more than $500 on a laptop. (my NiMH 600mhz celeron laptop gets about 2.5 hours on a charge, but only after I replaced the NiMH pack with a fresh one)

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Not awesome? by Travy.b · · Score: 0


      I can tell your a youngen ;)

      Ok, so I'm only 28, but I remember the days when a 286 at 12Mhz (instead of 8) and *4* meg of ram (instead of 2) was the bee's knees. That was only 15 years ago!

      New release PC's have always been 'overpowered' for what 90% of people use them for. Always have been. So the Laptop will still handle most things perfectly well. My 800Mhz Athlon runs EVERYTHING I want it to without fuss.

    7. Re:Not awesome? by 74nova · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Really you can pay $200 more for a laptop that goes three times as fast and lasts twice as long. Or pay double and get something that lasts 4 times as long. I really don't see any advantage to buying this laptop. A used celeron laptop would probably be a better deal if you absolutely can't spend more than $500 on a laptop
      you point is valid. however, i dont have $1300 for a good laptop. if all i needed was a mobile machine to do day to day stuff with, this would definitely do it for me. everybody knows that to a point, you get more for paying more. buy a 24pk of coke and its $.02/oz cheaper than the 12pks. hell, if you told dell you wanted 100 of those laptops you suggest, youd probably get them even cheaper! oh right, you probably dont have $120,000.

      its all a matter of perspective. to some people that want/need a laptop but dont need a lot of power, cheaper is always better. also, i think there is something about $500 for a laptop. people see that to get a dell desktop is about $500, but to get a walmart laptop ('hey, walmart is a well-known brand' they think to themselves) is now the same price. okay, maybe you need the $550 model to get windows to make that a little more fair. my point is that $500 for a laptop is mad cheap, regardless of the quality. that amount of money has not gotten you a laptop new for some time(if ever). the battery life is terrible, however, ill give you that.

      well, crap. i typed all that and just now saw your recommendation for a used celeron. that is a viable solution, theres a 1ghz dell on ebay for $400 right now.
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    8. Re:Not awesome? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I meant $300 more than a $500 laptop. So that's $800 more. (P4 laptop is cheaper than an Apple ibook. Almost anything is cheaper than Apple :).

      For $500 you don't get WiFi on there either. From my perspective a $500 laptop with essentially no battery is not worth it. You can get those AMD DeskNotes for $400. They are a battery-less computer in a laptop form factor.

      Uses of course is always the best deal if you don't need highest end stuff. Most people aren't willing to buy something that is used (it creeps them out). Also buying used is sometimes considered inappropriate for a gift. Although I got a used car for a gift, that was a fantastic gift!

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    9. Re:Not awesome? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      For twice the price you get 10x the laptop.

      However for someone who only needs that much power why pay twice as much for power and battery life they do not need?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:Not awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run Oppenoffice on such a beast and you will change your mind.

      I wish not a hacker by any means but I heard openoffice diagnosed with NT tools shows a 17x decrease in speed due to threading and object reloading problems. This is why openoffice is so slow.

      Perhaps someone reading this could enlighten me.

      But I would not mind the walmart laptop if it ran MS office. Openoffice would not be acceptable on such a system unless it had at least 256 megs of ram.

    11. Re:Not awesome? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      If you didn't want battery life, then why not buy a desktop? those are only $150-300.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    12. Re:Not awesome? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      to use as a cheap communication machine while travelling, I would love to have a cheap crappy laptop to plug in and go on.ine when i am away from home.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    13. Re:Not awesome? by krgallagher · · Score: 1
      " 1.5 hours is embarrassing. "

      Yeah it runs Linux, but does it have any Power Management configured? I've never run linux on a laptop, but I have looked at the power management features and they looked intimidating to configure. I have also heard that things like suspend do not always work with laptops in Linux.

      --

      Insert Generic Sig Here:

    14. Re:Not awesome? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      With something like a C3 shouldn't need to configure anything and suspend does nothing for you if you are actualy using the ntoebook.

      I have an old 366 Celeron notebook that gets 2.5hrs battery in Linux but less than 2 in Win98. As this was a cheapo CompUSA branded notebook it came with nothing but Win98 and some drivers. I imagine Balance is doing the same so Linux should perform better.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    15. Re:Not awesome? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      On cheap laptops suspend doesn't work right in windows either. Although updating the BIOS does help a lot.

      My friend's laptop had ACPI bugs that caused the fans to shut off when it got ABOVE a certain temp. Which after 2 seconds would trigger it to turn completely off because of overheating. He eventually patched it (acpi uses a funny byte code language and is replaced when you flash your bios).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  29. hmm by lordkuri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damn Small Linux, blackbox, and bluetooth, and I think I just found my next remote webserver admin tool. I can't justify $2k for a machine, but less than $600 (tax, etc) might make it really feasable.

    1. Re:hmm by burns210 · · Score: 1

      You get what you pay for. Why save 300 bucks when your system will likely last 30% shorter than the higher-quality system? Why saved a hundred bucks when your productivity isn't as high or when the system is just not fast enough?

      TCO != ICO

  30. sales stats? by pavera · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how well these linux pc's at walmart are selling? Anyway to find out? I'd be extremely interested to know what if any actual numbers of grandma's at walmart have been sold a linux pc.

    1. Re:sales stats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      At last count, we (Linspire), have sold 455,000 Linspire based desktop units. We expect to sell 75,000 of these laptop units by the end of this year!

    2. Re:sales stats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At last count, we (Linspire), have sold 485,000 Linspire based desktop units. We expect to sell 65,000 of these laptop units by the end of this year!

      See how easy it is to make up number as AC and seem informative?

    3. Re:sales stats? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Walmart's Linux PCs are sold off it's web site. If granny simply reads the adds in her Sunday papers, and shops the chain's brick and motar stores, there is no reason to think she knows Linux exists.

  31. But what about the midrange? by incom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I'm looking for is a cheap as possible laptop that has an nvidia video chipset, and no windows tax. I want to atleast be able to play UT2k4 on it.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    1. Re:But what about the midrange? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For a cheap midrange machine, I'd suggest watching http://www.gotapex.com for a day when there's a good coupon code for a Dell laptop posted.

  32. Better one for 50 more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ridiculus as it sounds, for 50 more, you get a better system, except it also has Windows. Something is really wrong there.

  33. Not that bad of a priced by tacocat · · Score: 1

    If you price out a 1GHz C3 board ($185) and a 14" monitor ($250) you are quickly topping out near $450. Considering that you get a finished system, it's a pretty decent price.

    If this thing runs PXE boot it would make a great LTSP terminal after you remove the hard drive.

    1. Re:Not that bad of a priced by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      I find it very hard to make a laptop with a 15" CRT. Or a desktop motherboard. Did you even read the title of the article?

  34. Using a Wal-Mart PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of computer geeks pulling up in pick-up trucks wearing stretch pants and shirts with wolves in the snow and carrying a cheap laptop is not going help the geek image.

  35. Thats weird .. by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

    When I click on the "see larger image" link, I can SWEAR that there is a "DVD" logo next to the CD ROM's eject button. Any one else think so?

  36. No wireless G. by Boronx · · Score: 1

    I have yet to see a half way low priced linux laptop with a built in wireless adapter when these days all of the lowest budget Windows laptops have them.

  37. I'm just saying.. by tedtimmons · · Score: 0, Troll

    Michael Robertson is a dork. This isn't a troll, I worked under one of his no-business-model companies for years.

    Just saying.

  38. Step 2 by maddh · · Score: 1

    K, got the laptop from Walmart, got my 30-case of Bud and NASCAR hat (also from Walmart), now to get that T-3 line through the trailer-park.

    1. Re:Step 2 by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Nascar fans drink Busch.

      For the quality of the taste.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  39. Overpriced? by freeweed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, 128 MB RAM, 30GB hard drive, and a plain vanilla CD-ROM. Seems overpriced for what you get, but cheap nonetheless.

    I can't speak for the US market, but up here in Canada the cheapest new laptop runs you about $1,000, which is about $800 USD. Granted, this is with a 2+ ghz cpu, 256 MB RAM, 20-30GB drive and a dvd-rom.

    However, to pay anything less than this requires checking out the used laptop market. Here we see such gems as a P3-700, 64-96MB RAM, 8-10GB drive selling for $5-600 all the time. Say about $4-500 USD.

    I don't know about you folks, but this looks like a pretty nice deal for those folks who aren't planning on running Doom3 on their laptops. The ram's a bit scanty for any modern OS, but otherwise this is a perfectly good machine to do 99% of what people do with a laptop.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Overpriced? by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to nitpick or anything like that, but I have noticed that prices are dropping here in Canada in the last month or so.

      TigerDirect had this Acer TravelMate 2303LCH for 839$Cdn about 2 weeks ago. It is 1.5MHz Celeron, but has 256MB

      They also have this Systimax laptop for 877$Cdn. It is a 2.0 Celeron, but with only 128MB.

      The same goes for off-lease machines sold at many computer stores too. An off lease P3-900 IBM Thinkpad with 256MB and DVD ROM used to be 680$Cdn or so. Last week it was 650$Cdn, and other stores had good deals for 699$Cdn. I am monitoring the prices myself because I need to replace my P2-300 128MB machine with something more current. I don't want to spend over a 1000$Cdn though.

    2. Re:Overpriced? by chill · · Score: 1

      I have Linspire on two machines at home, including a laptop. It does a great job for family computing.

      However, I can say with certainty that 128 Mb of RAM will make it run like a 3-legged arthritic dog. Been there, done that. My laptop is a Panasonic Toughbook w/a 933 MHz P3 that started with 128 Mb of RAM. That lasted 2 boots and I upgraded to 384 Mb and that was acceptable.

      WalMart better stock some SO-DIMMs or people are going to be seriously dissapointed when they open Mozilla, OpenOffice Writer, Mozilla Mail and PhoneGAIM all at once.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    3. Re:Overpriced? by bigberk · · Score: 1
      I have noticed that prices are dropping here in Canada in the last month or so
      Might be due to the plummeting US dollar. This year, suddenly everything imported from the US got about 20% cheaper over a few months. Compared to two years ago, everything imported from the US is over 30% cheaper. If anything, retailers will be slow to pass on that (also as they hoard some extre earnings).
    4. Re:Overpriced? by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1
      about $1,000, which is about $800 USD

      Does anyone remember, back in the good ol' days (before Bush Jr.), when we walked uphill in the snow without shoes and we could joke with "about $1000 CAD, which is about 12 cents in the US".

      Man I miss those days. Now when I say it my canadian cousins just bitchslap me.
    5. Re:Overpriced? by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Just like the mad cow scare did not impact much the local prices of beef, despite low exports to US, Europe and Japan.

      The beef producers complain about not being able to sell their cattle, the consumer does not see lower prices.

      Where is the difference? The middleman pockets it!

    6. Re:Overpriced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (figures just taken from yahoo)

      $1 CAD = 81 US cents
      $1 USD = 75 eurocents (er, what the hell do they call those anyway?)

      So give it a few more months. Then we can all play "$1000 USD, or about $2.50 in real money (euros)."

      And yeah, yet another thing to thank Dubya for.

      Bonus Visual Aid

    7. Re:Overpriced? by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      I agree, if someone could find anywhere that sold brand new, in the box laptops that could match the specs or beat it, for $500, I'd be shocked.
      I'd be happy with a laptop like that for the price just to throw Windows* on it and do what I need with it. If I want to play games I'll use my desktop that's made for gaming.
      I'm sure the people that are buying their discount pcs/laptops from walmart aren't exactly technophiles that care if they have the latest hardware as long as they can run Gearhead Garage and watch streaming porn while drinking their Bud in their living room that turns into a kitchen when you lift up the little folding counter thing and all those other redneck stereotypes because people who live in trailers are fun to make fun of and etc.

      * Right now I'm on a 120mhz tablet with 32mb of ram and Windows 98 and I have two IE windows open, instant messenger, am downloading an email attachment while listening to mp3s and it's not struggling at all.
      My debian pc with a k6/300 or something along those lines and 64mb of would grind to a halt if i attempted it on there

    8. Re:Overpriced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just bought a laptop for a friend who wanted to spend around $500 (US). I found, on ebay, an apple ibook, 12 in, 600 mhz, for $520... however, it came with 640 megs of ram, built in wireless as well as a wireless base station, a spare battery, dvd-rom and cd burner, plus the mac OS, of course. I'd venture to say that the ibook is probably a better-built machine than the wal-mart laptop... plus this one, for about the same price, addressed some of the issues with the wal mart variety (no dvd/cd burning, low battery, low ram, etc). Not to start a mac vs. pc vs. linux battle or anything; just saying that the used market isn't too bad, really. (This deal seemed fairly common for what's been going around ebay lately too.)

    9. Re:Overpriced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... obviously there is something wrong with your configuration.

    10. Re:Overpriced? by akadruid · · Score: 1

      Likewise, here in the UK, it would destroy the second-hand laptop market.

      look on ebay.co.uk for laptop auctions finishing in the next day for less the 265GBP, which is 500USD.

      You will not find anything close to the specs of the Walmart $500, let alone the $550 machine. And that is for second-hand machines, from non-reputable dealers with little or no warrenty.

      Check out this example:
      9 hours to go, and it's at the same price as the Walmart 1.1Ghz WinXP/Wireless machine

      It has P3 750Mhz, same RAM, less HD space, smaller screen, probably non-legit OS and so on. Typical price for UK ebay - as you can see it has attracted a fair number of bids. And that's 2nd-hand!!

      Come on ASDA. Get these in stock asap.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    11. Re:Overpriced? by Annihilon · · Score: 0

      You should all think yourself lucky. The cheapest new laptop over here in the UK will set you back about £600 which is about a $1000. And that would be damn sh*tty. My next laptop is going to be an Apple. They are just so much nicer than any traditional ones.

    12. Re:Overpriced? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Except that Walmart offers a notebook that has Wifi and bigger hard drive and better CPU for only $549. For only 50-70 bucks more gets you a decent computer than this subpar thing.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  40. It runs Linspire by dteichman2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem with Linspire (Lindows) is that it isn't quite Linux (yes, I know it really is Linux) and it isn't quite Windows. So, end-users might find it difficult. Even a pro seemed to think it was hard to use.

    Can a Red Hat Guru Survive on a Lindows Laptop?

    --


    Silence is golden... and duct tape is silver.
    1. Re:It runs Linspire by burns210 · · Score: 1

      So why isn't Ubuntu, Mandrake or Redhat(they left this potential market to Fedora, but still), throwing themselves to get pre-bundled with crap-level systems? Lindows/Linspire is trying. Hopefully, it benefits Linux as a whole, but having a bastardized half-n-half system may be worse than a truer-blood Linux system.

      To a true newb. Running Windows is somewhat familiar... Buttons and colors and windows. When moving to a new system, there is an important step. The system has to be different enough that it cannot be confused with the original, it has to be different enough so that the user EXPECTS things to be different, and thus, they won't get upset when they aren't like they were("well, this LOOKS like windows XP, so Why can't I run game X, or find a setting in Y?!"). There needs to be a clear "ok, this ISN'T Windows, and so things will be different" mindset, otherwise we are setting ourselves up for failure.

  41. reservations by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

    I have reservations about walmart doing anything. Though it would be nice to see linux hit the open market in mid-west america in a ready packaged, boot and go format,I have a sneaking suspicion that plenty of these systems will end up with pirated versions of XP or other MS tripe on them.

    Still one has to wonder what kind of quality is put into this sub $500 laptop. I mean once OS cost drops near $0 it should become clear that the production (and ultimaty retail) costs go to hardware. This is walmart! so one must ask how much of the $500 is profit margin? 10, 15, 20, 50%?

    I for one would be very suspicious of the specs and quality of the parts. Because, lets face it, who needs a system with refurbished harddrives and Brand X ram that go up in smoke after 2 months?... hell, maybe they will run Cyrix.

    IM

    1. Re:reservations by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart actually has one of the lowest profit margins of all companies, and the OS is very cheap as well. So that means most of the price actually goes to the hardware. There are no refurb parts, and if you had actually read anything, you'd see it uses a VIA C3. As was pointed out before, it beats paying the same for a used P3 laptop with maybe half the memory and less than half the HD, because that's all you'd get at that price otherwise. It has no burner, but it has ethernet... Still good for the price.

      --
      ///<sig />
    2. Re:reservations by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

      Cyrix was meant as a joke. Just let it go man let it go. I did RTFA, but I still feel the need to be paranoid and xenophobic, especailly about a HUGE corporation, and its interest in OSS, you hear that IBM, I've got my foil hat ready for you.

    3. Re:reservations by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1
      I mean once OS cost drops near $0 it should become clear that the production (and ultimaty retail) costs go to hardware.


      The OS isn't free. Linspire costs money.
      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:reservations by IcarusMoth · · Score: 1

      Wow! I must have been really REALLY high, I've had to update a lot of my knowledge within the past 24 hours. I'd somehow gotten under the impression that Linspire was availible as source and thus could be made free. But after a few minutes of early morning putting around the site... I see no free source or binary downloads... well, knowledge updated.
      ---
      There was a sig here once

  42. C3 makes for a terrible laptop by etymxris · · Score: 3, Informative

    [I posted this elsewhere, but it's relevant here too.]

    This is a bad choice. I have a C3 933Mhz processor. It performs roughly equivalent to a 300Mhz PIII. Not only this, but it is extremely hot. The C3 was supposed to be cool, but this is one of the hottest laptops I've used. I haven't objectively measured it with a thermistor yet, but the external temp seems about 55 C to 60 C. If I put the laptop on my bare chest it leaves red marks. It may be because the laptop is so thin, or maybe the HSF construction is shoddy.

    The PIII/M is cool, and embarrasses the C3 in terms of performance. This is partly due to C3 being a bad processor, but also largely due to PIII/M being a good processor. In fact, if I was getting an x86 notebook, I wouldn't accept anything except a PIII. I've personally experienced Athlon notebooks, P4 notebooks, and VIA notebooks, and can tell that they are all inferior. I can't speak to Transmeta or Apple branded notebooks.

    If this C3 notebook is at all appealing to you, my advice is to get an old PIII off ebay or reburbished from one of many dealers. You'll pay the same price and get a much higher performing, cooler laptop.

    1. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by haberb · · Score: 1
      If I put the laptop on my bare chest it leaves red marks. It may be because the laptop is so thin, or maybe the HSF construction is shoddy.
      Wouldn't that be a chesttop then? Dude, you're using it wrong! Actually, thanks for the info. I've never bought a laptop before, and i'm in the process of looking for one below $600 for my gf going back to grad school. I've heard the battery life on these Balance are around 90 minutes. What can I expect from a refurbished P3 IBM thinkpad?
    2. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by Dahan · · Score: 1
      In fact, if I was getting an x86 notebook, I wouldn't accept anything except a PIII.

      If I were getting an x86 notebook, I'd go for the Pentium M (part of Intel's Centrino package). It's rumored that the design is based off the Pentium III, and not only does it perform quite well, it stays cool too.

    3. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by etymxris · · Score: 1
      I've heard the battery life on these Balance are around 90 minutes. What can I expect from a refurbished P3 IBM thinkpad?
      I can't speak to the battery life of specific models. It varies greatly. But it certainly helps to start with a lower power processor. After that, it's a trade-off between weight and battery life.

      Battery life is very important, but equally so is weight. Many people buy laptops just looking at things like processor speed and RAM, without paying attention to the weight. Then they have a 9 pound clunker that's too unweildy to take to the library or class. I'd consider anything over 5 pounds unportable, but the exact weight varies by person.

      As for thinkpads, I've had one and found the "rubber nipple" on mine nearly unbearable to use. Touchpads are much better. But again, that may be personal preference speaking. Good luck on your shopping.
    4. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by etymxris · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's rumored that the design is based off the Pentium III, and not only does it perform quite well, it stays cool too.
      It's more than a rumor. It's a well known fact. The M series sprung from the PIII series. They are both excellent choices.
    5. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by prockcore · · Score: 1

      It performs roughly equivalent to a 300Mhz PIII. Not only this, but it is extremely hot. The C3 was supposed to be cool, but this is one of the hottest laptops I've used.

      It's completely fanless and draws extremely low power (you can get by with a 30W fanless PSU).

      The C3 1ghz has a small fan and runs cooler, but you have the noise to deal with.

      The C3 is mostly used for small, low-power, *quiet* applications.. like a car mp3 player (or my mame cabinet, as it were)

      I bet this laptop gets awesome battery life.

    6. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by damiam · · Score: 1

      Every thinkpad I've seen recently has a touchpad as well. I personally like the nipple, but I know plenty of Thinkpad owners who don't and just use the touchpad.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    7. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by adesai9 · · Score: 1

      And a super cheap battery, hdd, CD-ROM to even it out....:)

    8. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I'd kill for a trackpoint nipple dealy on a desktop keyboard. I especially like them on laptops because I don't have to move my hands from the keyboard to use the "mouse" like on my Dell, where the touchpad is the only input device.

    9. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touchpad-vs-eraserhead is a personal issue. I hate touchpads. The eraserhead works OK for simple tasks, but better is to just have a wired optical mouse or trackball.

      YMMWV.

    10. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by Nik13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the C3 isn't super fast, but not quite that slow either. Perhaps it's that slow for you because it's getting too hot? Makes me wonder if the laptop you have doesn't have problems or if it's just bad engineering. As for buying an old P3 laptop, the CPU will not really be any faster, the only REAL difference you'll get is: a old/used/worn laptop with no warranty, usually half that memory, much less HD space, no USB2, and in most cases a pretty much dead battery. If you can shell out a bit more, yes, you can get something refurb that's actually pretty good. Good specs (including a working battery!), good price, and a (small) warranty.

      --
      ///<sig />
    11. Re:C3 makes for a terrible laptop by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Hmm, got a cite? I've always viewed it as a well-known rumor, in that everyone says it, and that there are very good reasons to believe it's the case, but as far as I know, Intel has never confirmed it.

  43. What are some good vendors for linux laptops by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking of replacing the iBook that I got last year with something a bit speedier. I'm not sure I want to pay the premium for a mac, but I love being able to drop into a console. I'd like to get a laptop that runs linux, but I'm not looking forward to paying a MS tax for a laptop with XP installed, just to install linux over it.

    What are some good places to get a laptop with linux-preinstalled? (or a dual-boot linux/XP laptop?)

    --
    Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    1. Re:What are some good vendors for linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can try Walmart. I hear they are selling a Linux based laptop now. It could be just a rumour, but I swear I heard it somewhere on a website. I'll try and find out where and let you know!

    2. Re:What are some good vendors for linux laptops by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You can get an OS-less laptop from www.powernotebooks.com, which largely resells Sager (Clevo) laptops. When I was researching notebooks, I read only good things about them. I think Roblimo bought a unit from them and was happy.

      Before doing anything, you could also try replacing OS X with Linux on your iBook and see if that helps out any wrt speed.

    3. Re:What are some good vendors for linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try uping your ram first, if your running below 256MB then OSX is alot less usable

    4. Re:What are some good vendors for linux laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been thinking of replacing the iBook that I got last year with ... a laptop that runs linux


      I have a honda civic, if you want to trade your BMW M5 for it, I'd be fine with that!

  44. VIA processors... great for soho servers by rsborg · · Score: 1
    Are not exactly good for high-performance computing, but they probably do great for basic computer usage (im not even talking about pseudo-power users who use office/etc)... we're talking browsing and email.

    Curiously enough, this might make a great home server... think about it

    • runs linux... check
    • lowpower processor you can keep on all the time... check
    • Monitor and keyboard for when you need console access... check
    Agruably a bit expensive, but you can probably plug in your FW or USB2 drive as a cheap NAS... to contrast with the kurobox I just got, this thing is probably more flexible and powerful, and at about only $200 more considering the drive. and take the laptop on the road for the occasional flight or two so you don't have to ever be away from your favorite roguelike :-)
    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  45. what does "sub-..." mean? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    For those whose 1st langauge is English, what does "sub-" mean in general? If this PC were to be offered at US$495, would it still be called a sub-$500 laptop? Where does it end?

    1. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really have to do with english language, it has to do with marketing. If it were $499.99 it would still be "sub-$500" or "under $500".. people see a big price like $500, then the ad says its below that, even if its just 1 penny below, it sells.

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      It ends at $499.99 and 9/10s of a cent.

      Yeah...you got the meangin just fine. It's marketspeak.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      $499.99 is where it ends. Where else?

    4. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by roboneal · · Score: 1

      "Sub" simply means under. So a sub-$500 laptop would be priced between $401-499. Anything lower would be a sub-$400 laptop (and so on).

      Keep in mind that $500 is a magic number for many consumer electronic items here in the U.S. Often considered the "true" mass merchandise target price.

    5. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by Otter · · Score: 1
      If this PC were to be offered at US$495, would it still be called a sub-$500 laptop? Where does it end?

      Uhh, at $499.99? Honestly, this isn't that complicated.

    6. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      The prefix 'sub' simply means 'below' or 'less than'. It's not a quantifiable value AFAIK - you can call an unsatisfactory piece of work 'substandard' (below the standard you expect) and you can call a $498 laptop a sub-$1000000 laptop if you want, but generally marketers tend to say 'sub $500' to make it sound like a substantial amount less than that price, even when the extra $2 makes no real difference.

    7. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where does it end?"

      It ends when the price exceeds $499.99.

      Sub - $500 means "At a price below $500". Generally this means $499.99 or other similar price point just an itch and a scratch below some imagined magic price point.

    8. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      I do believe sub, since it means below, would constitute up to and including $499.99 US

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    9. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Actually, the answer is:

      lim x
      x->500

    10. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Or x less than 500

      $499.99 is not the answer because it could be $499.999 or $499.9999 (although not practical)

    11. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      A $1 laptop would be sub-$500 as well, but whomever gets caught marketing it that way would find their self out on the street :)

      Specifically, the sub-$500 computer is the "holy grail" sought for in the late 90's.

    12. Re:what does "sub-..." mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you understand his question? I think he meant where it stops in the `other' direction. That's why he wrote a US$495. Now answer the question. Where does it stop in the opposite direction?

  46. Someone has to say it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Korea only old people buy Sub-$500 laptops with Linspire.

  47. But a little more gets you a much better machine by BlurryEyed · · Score: 1

    This is nice, but here we see a machine with 256Mb, DVD, intergrated wireless and a real AMD processer. Seems that the argument that Windows makes a machine more expensive doesn't play through. I'd love to see these features on a Linux notebook even for the same price!

  48. Remembering the days... by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    Ah, the days of yore, when a P-90 was respectable. Of course my current laptop is a toshiba tecra with a P-120, 78MB ram, 1.2GB hard drive, and a 6x cdrom. Running slackware. Most things still run fine, you just don't want to run bloatware like Firefox ("links -g" works like a charm).

  49. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A beowulf clus... I can't bring myself to do it.

  50. Obligatory... by NilObject · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Beowolf cluster of these! You could keep a repair shop the size of Texas in operation for years!

  51. Poor specs? by bigberk · · Score: 1

    I don't think the sepcifications are too bad at all. Most people don't do very high end stuff on their computers. There are millions of students worldwide that would be satisfied with something that surfs the web, runs word processors and basic graphics programs, does email, and runs some simple games.

    I could do all that on my 386 with DOS; so you sure as hell can do all that with a system at these specs.

  52. for $50 more get a better Laptop by the same maker by soundbyt · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you click on the See Similar link, there is another laptop by the same manufacturer with better hardware that includes XP Home. I bet it will even run Lindo^H^HSpire. Nothing that groundbreaking.

    1.1 GHz Mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor

    14.1" XGA TFT LCD screen

    40 GB hard drive

    128 MB RAM

    DVD-ROM drive

    Integrated 802.11b wireless networking

  53. OO.org by x3ro · · Score: 1

    Actually they have done their best to make the inclusion of OO.org sound like it has MSOffice:

    Complete Microsoft Office file-compatible office software suite lets you easily create and share written files (.doc), spreadsheets (.xls) and presentations (.ppt). Even create PDFs and export presentations to Macromedia Flash

    I sort of agree with an earlier poster that this kind of thing does make FL/OSS look like a bit of a ripoff .. I-Can't-Believe-It's-Not-Windows.

    --
    [ UNSIGNED NOT NULL ]
  54. uk $2 = £1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK its not going to set any speed records, but at the momment the dollar is something like 2-1. Maths was never my strong point, but a new laptop which is reasonable for £250!! (+ shipping of course, oh yeah and + a power adapter). Ok, so not £250 then, but still rediculously cheap, you couldn't get a PII-450 for that over here.

    1. Re:uk $2 = £1 by really? · · Score: 1

      I have several 1GHz C3 boxes. I like them a lot, and recommend them to people, but, performance wise, they are not really that different from a PII-450. Well, depending what you use them for that is. The big difference would be disk I/O as an old PII is not likely to support the fastest drives. This being a laptop though ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:uk $2 = £1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maths was never my strong point

      Neither was "Englishes."

    3. Re:uk $2 = £1 by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nevertheless, the term is correct. Mathematics = maths. It's called British English, get used to it.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    4. Re:uk $2 = £1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called British English

      Unless you're English, in which it's called "English".

    5. Re:uk $2 = £1 by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      I reckon Americanised English should be given its own name. I agree with parent, "English" is taken.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  55. Nothing against Wal Mart shoppers by Stop+Error · · Score: 1

    But they just don't strike me as the Linux crowd.

    --
    No keyboard detected. Press any key to continue.
    1. Re:Nothing against Wal Mart shoppers by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      They're the discount crowd that doesn't have much interest in what operating system they run, as long as it does basic functions. This could be a good product for a low income family. This could make a good gift for a child for Christmas. As long as this isn't typical walmart crap, this might be a successful product.

  56. No bargain here by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    When you go to the walmart page, loong on the right margin and investigate the -other- lowball machines they sell. For about 70 more you can get one with an AMB Mobile Athlon, 802.11b, a larger hd, a dvd instead of cd and of course XP Home. Buy that, nuke XP and load load the distro of your choice.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  57. Who cares if it's Linspire by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

    Since it runs linspire (which I personally wouldn't touch with a 3.048 meter pole) it should be able to run other, better distros. Which is a good thing (TM) for us geeks who want a cheap laptop that actually works fully with Linux.

    --
    #include "sig.h"
    1. Re:Who cares if it's Linspire by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
      Exactly. You get something that already has a working X-Server, sound, drives, power management, etc. Laptops usually have some super crappy top secret sound and video chipsets, especially low-end ones. The fact that this thing comes with Linux already means that its fully supported by the kernel and X11.

      Having personally installed Linux on 4 different laptops, I can attest that it is no picnic. You quickly become an expert on obscure chipsets and learn to write config files using the force.

      That being said, I think I would go for something more like a used $100 IBM Z50 and slap NetBSD on it if I wanted a *Nix laptop. Tough to beat that 12 hour battery life and the keyboards are just outstanding (got one for my wife a couple years ago).

      I'm pretty happy with my Zaurus though for my portable computing needs, in fact it fits my style better. A PDA with a James Bond keyboard running Linux, now thats cool.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
  58. I don't think anyone will see the box.. by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The previous Linux/Walmart boxes were never available at the walmart stores, only at walmart.com. While the CNET article doesn't say that it won't be sold in stores, it starts out with with "Walmart.com and Linspire revealed.." and ends with "the computer is available at walmart.com". No mention that it would be available at stores.

    My guess is people who buy computers online are somewhat more savy than those who buy at Wal-Mart stores.

  59. Need more information by volsung · · Score: 1
    For $500, I can believe that this thing is both slow and lacking in storage. Some things I can't figure out since they only show one angle:
    1. Sound device? Speakers? Headphone jack?
    2. Ethernet?
    3. 56k Modem?
    4. PCMCIA?
    I would hope #1, #2, and #3, but the description doesn't give you any clues.

    On the flip side, it is painfully honest about the batteries. It takes 3.5 hours (5 if the laptop is on) to charge for 1.5 hours of use?!?! What kind of batteries are these? NiCad? There is something seriously wrong here.

    1. Re:Need more information by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

      > On the flip side, it is painfully honest about the batteries. It takes
      > 3.5 hours (5 if the laptop is on) to charge for 1.5 hours of use?!?

      No, I'd guess it is the fact that most Linux distros suck ass at power management. Not slagging Linux, I do eat my own dogfood on my current Thinkpad but it stays on AC power most of the time. The claimed battery life (under the supplied XP) is about twice what I manage to get under Linux.

      On my previous Thinkpad (A 570e with a second battery in the UltraBase) running RH 7.3 I had managed to tweak things to the point where I'd get almost four hours runtime on a system speced to run five under Windows.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    2. Re:Need more information by volsung · · Score: 1

      I can agree with that. Back when I was running PPC Linux on my iBook, I wasn't able to get as much battery life as in OS X. Still, the charging time is really bizarre. I think from total discharge, my batteries take 1.5 to 2 hours to recharge (with the computer running!) and last about 3-4 hours even if I disable CPU clock throttling. Maybe the external power supply can't supply enough current. (Granted, this is all Mac hardware I'm comparing to.)

  60. Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd take any thinkpad available for that price any day. Put linux on it and work away to glory..

    1. Re:Thinkpad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great!

      Where are you getting that the discussion at hand has ANYTHING to do with Thinkpads?

    2. Re:Thinkpad by narcc · · Score: 2

      The parent AC must think all laptops are 'thinkpads'. Hell, it worked for kleenex -- why not IBM?

  61. hey hey hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect laptop for every ghetto college student.

  62. $50 more gets faster proc, DVD Rom, bigger HDD!!! by adesai9 · · Score: 1

    Balance notebook with AMD XP-M 1600, 40GB HDD, DVD Rom sounds much better. Comes with windows. If the manufacturer removes it i am sure he can shave $25 off the price!!! http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product _id=3504708&cat=179113&type=19&dept=3944

  63. You should change banks by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who do you bank with troll, "1st Bank of Joe and Billy-Bob"? My bank has worked properly with Mozilla-based browsers for nearly five years now, and before that only had visual rendering issues except for a brief time after a botched redesign. Tell 'em to get with the program and fix their website so that it conforms to real standards. If they are unresponsive, vote with your dollars and your feet and trot on over to...well...almost any other bank.

    Of course, you could explore other options:

    * shell out extra $ for a copy of WinXP or a machine with it pre-installed

    * break the law and put a cracked or pirated Windows on your machine

    * stick to physically visiting your branch, ATMs and telephone banking

  64. Does the average user want linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know it's Linspire, but still the average user doesn't know to configure their digital camera with linux, or recompile the kernel.

    1. Re:Does the average user want linux? by narcc · · Score: 2

      I know it's Linspire, but still the average user doesn't know to configure their digital camera with linux, or recompile the kernel.

      The average user will, most likely, never have to recompile the kernel. As for the digital camera, that's a problem for the camera manufacturer to solve. Wal-mart can put enough preasure (if they want) on manufacturer to include software for Linspire.

      I figure wal-mart supporting linux (in its own greedy way) just may be a good thing.

  65. this isn't worth buying..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it uses a via processor, which in turn is alot slower than a intel or amd processor at the same clock speed.
    And for 500 bucks you could get a nice used or refurbished laptop that offers more peformance and features (cd or dvd burner too)

    Not only that, this laptop uses cheap hardware, I doubt the harddrive would last more than a year.

  66. sorry by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Sorry, if its for sale @ Walmart it isnt in my marketplace.

    Ive never spent a nickle in that community destroying shit hole and I dont instend too.

    I hope you make the same choice.

    Some Walmart info

    This is good: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17647

    1. Re:sorry by Mage+Powers · · Score: 1

      With the subject of sorry I was expecting a post of "The Princess is in another castle" or maybe a admitting you're behind this ;)

      Please be less vague wih those subject lines!

  67. I don't get it. by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

    First, obviously, its overpriced for the stuff you get. Second, people who'd go for something like this (Walmart and cheap laptop) for their computing needs would certainly be under the influence of the wintel FUD (clock speed, intel inside, windows XP...), and therefore would be reluctant to buy this.
    For everyone else there is a used yet good laptop off eBay, or a little more money for a better product. And if they care about linux enough, many distros are now friendly enough to yield a standard laptop very functional in no time.

  68. Full Specs ? by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
    What really bothers me with Walmart Computer products is that they never, ever post full specs. So you either guess, or find out somewhere else. So, what's the weight of this beast ? This is kind of important for a notebook. Is there an internal modem ? Ethernet port ? (most mobos if not all come with ethernet on board these days). Is there a free slot to add at least 128 of RAM ? How come it only has a 1.5 hour of battery life ?

    Of course, it doesn't seem to have a PCMCIA slot, this is inconvenient for a notebook. But, if it is light, it has an ethernet port and you can easily add 128 Mb (which is really inexpensive these days), you can have a fully functional notebook for about US$ 550. Not bad at all ! But they NEED to give you the info ! I hope they'll stock them in the stores, I'd love to see it and maybe get one.

  69. Not my reading by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Actually, the pro thought it was quite easy to use - but that he had to a install a lot of stuff he would have thought of as common (like ssh).

    However, I would say that there's no call for complaining the installation of Sendmail would be rather difficult for the average user. I am a pretty well versed user and would never be trying to install Sendmail! I'd at least look at Postfix first.

    The bit about the newer wireless card not working was offputting, but then I guess that's why you'd buy a laptop pre-configured for Lindows where they had the proper card in place.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  70. Dell Deals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Currently, Dell SB has a $599 AR Laptop with 2.6 Celeron, 256 Ram, 30 GB HD, CDRW/DVD, and built in wireless.

    E-Value Code: 6W300 - 1od1112s

    Much better deal.

  71. Re:But a little more gets you a much better machin by Drgnkght · · Score: 1

    I saw that too. It makes me wonder why they didn't just use the same hardware, and preinstall linux instead of windows. I suppose it could be that Windows XP is too "bloated" for the C3, or perhaps it allows them enjoy a increase profit margin...

    Regardless, it seems to me they'd sell more of these if the hardware was equivalent to the Windows laptops they sell. Just because linux will run on lower performance computers doesn't mean that most linux users *want* lower performance hardware.

  72. Way too many stereotypes by OldBaldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please watch the stereotypes. I shop Walmart. I also went to private schools until grad school, where I got my Ph.D. in Statistics. I don't hunt, although I do ski and scuba dive. I also employ programmers for things I design.

    1. Re:Way too many stereotypes by herbert_axelrod · · Score: 0, Funny

      Please watch the stereotypes. I shop Walmart. I also went to private schools until grad school, where I got my Ph.D. in Statistics. I don't hunt, although I do ski and scuba dive. I also employ programmers for things I design.

      cheap bastard...

    2. Re:Way too many stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you do have a t-shirt that says "Who farted?"?

    3. Re:Way too many stereotypes by powerlinekid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have a Ph.D in stats and you're using that to prove you're not an idiot?

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    4. Re:Way too many stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probablly why he said "odds are" and not "for sure". You did get to study the concept of odds somewhere in you Dr. Stat quest of glory?

    5. Re:Way too many stereotypes by VoidWraith · · Score: 0

      Its sad that a Ph.D in Stats has to sink so low as to stab his progeny in the back by supporting a company with a vested and pronounced interest in global monopoly, just to afford to live for the moment. Think about it before you shop Wal-Mart. Is it worth it?

    6. Re:Way too many stereotypes by OldBaldGuy · · Score: 1

      No, but I do have one that says "I'm too sexy for my hair, which is why it isn't there"

    7. Re:Way too many stereotypes by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 2, Funny

      I shop Walmart. I also went to private schools until grad school, where I got my Ph.D. in Statistics.

      I think you meant to say: "I work at Walmart. How may I help you?"

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    8. Re:Way too many stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just thanks. Here I am 5 minutes later still pissing myself as I type this -- this is the best laugh I got from Slashdot in months.

    9. Re:Way too many stereotypes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former Walmart Employee (during a few years while going to a public university) I can say that Walmart is evil and we should stop shopping there. When working there, several times, the management transfered hours that I worked to the next weeks schedule so I would not be eligable for overtime or benefits. Illegal, I think so...... And they beat up manufacutrers, encourage outsourcing to China, and defend companies that dump products on US markets to get you those cheap cheap prices.

  73. Sorry, but by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

    there never was a 300MHz PIII.

    1. Re:Sorry, but by etymxris · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. I believe the comparison I was remembering was a celeron 400Mhz. Sticking to what I'm certain of, I've a 500Mhz PIII, and it noticably outperforms my C3 even with a slower memory architecture and less total RAM.

    2. Re:Sorry, but by tepples · · Score: 1

      there never was a 300MHz PIII.

      There is when a Pentium M (the version of the PIII used with the Centrino chipset) clocks itself down on idle.

  74. Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

    It's going to be ugly when Joe User buys one of these things and tries to get a wireless working. You can imagine how the support call will go when the poor user mentiones he's using Linspire/Linux.

    For a non-Windows PC to work on a mass-market level, it has to be sold as an appliance. It should come out of the box with all that you need to perform "basic" functionality (web browser, email, productivity suite). All of these things exist in Linux. But if the user isn't able to log onto Linspire's site because they can't hook up to their wireless router or USB DSL/Cable modem to get those apps, they're going to go back and either return the notebook or buy XP

    1. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't Joe User be able to get a wireless network working with one of these?

    2. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Exactly why the common man's Unix laptop is still the $1000 iBook. This thing is junk compared to (from highest price down):

      *The aforementioned iBook, if you don't care about Windows. Still very cheap for portable, $1000 with pro OS and WiFi, and enough battery to make it a viable low-cost laptop.
      *Cheap Dell laptops, starting at $699 for a name-brand computer that'd be slightly better than this.
      *Desktops in the same price range, the best choice for the economically challenged; this thing doesn't even have a CD-RW and is probably as slow as molasses -- 128 MB RAM isn't probably enough for a modern Linux GUI and any large software.

    3. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

      Admitedly, I last messed with this with my DLink card in the earlier days of 2.6. Out of curiosity, I took a peek at the madwifi project's readme and howto files. I'm sorry, but I doubt people who have trouble figuring out how to send an email attachment are going to succesfully compile the modules, put them where they need to go, not to mention building a script to run the necessary iw* commands. There might be some management tool available that comes with Linspire that takes care of figuring out what adapter you're using and assisting the user with setting up WEP (or other security) and creating profiles for different access points. If so, this post is moot, my bad.

      A Windoze or Mac notebook pretty much either has wireless functionality out of the box or with the insertion of a card and CD. I was unable to find a reference to Linux compatibility with wireless adapters on a cursory check of the Linksys, Netgear and DLink sites. Who's Joe N00b going to call if the manufacturers doesn't support Linux? Walmart? Linspire?

    4. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      If you mean "If someone buys hardware not supported by Linspire, there will be a problem with it working under Linspire," then this is the same case as with Windows - if you buy hardware not supported by windows, it will not work with Windows.

      And if you call tech support, they'll tell you that. Same as with Linux, whether they are new or not.

      Yes, Linux vendors expect an end user to activate thier brain and make decisions for themselves. This used to be standard operating procedure until MS dumbed everything down and made users afraid of thier computers. Hopefully, this gets turned around and people can start getting smarter instead of dumber for a change.

      If not, please let the dumb ones keep using Windows.

    5. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Carcass666 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what level intelligence a Walmart shopper's brain exhibits when it's "activated." They could be a Mensa member and still have difficulty finding a PCMCIA wireless adapter on Walmart or BestBuy shelves that mentions Linux compatibliity.

      If I buy a notebook with Windows XP and a wireless card, odd's are pretty good I will be able to get online. If I buy a Linux notebook and a wireless card, unless I have a wired jack to connect to, or have a second computer, I'm not going to be able to get online to get the wireless drivers, let alone get them installed and configured properly.

      If people want "let the dumb ones keep using Windows", that's fine. Just don't complain that Linux is still a niche player on the desktop.

    6. Re:Potential "Black Eye's" For Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe user didnt get the wireless set up in windows either. he had the neighborhood kid do it.

      people need to get over this bullshit about joe user, Joe user isnt doing anything himself to begin with, why would they in linux.

      they didnt even hook up the cable modem

  75. Old Joke Can Go Away Now... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I think this "joke" is pretty outdated. Most people who have a clue know the difference between Linux and Windows. Those that don't will have exactly the SAME learning curve picking up OpenOffice and Firefox as MS Office and IE. You do not need to know all about Linux file systems and compiling the kernel to jump right into composing docs with OO, and surfing the web with Mozilla.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Old Joke Can Go Away Now... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      yes, but they wont have the same learning curve when it comes to getting software for your OS.

      They will buy software from the same "expert" that sold them the computer and wonder why it won't work.

    2. Re:Old Joke Can Go Away Now... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that people who do nothing more than email, web, and wordprocessing will sudenly get an itch for Doom3?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Old Joke Can Go Away Now... by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      no, but they do for Hoyle Solitare, and Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing 75.

    4. Re:Old Joke Can Go Away Now... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Solitare is on most Linux distros. Typing? Well, that's a good point.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  76. Not a bad deal... by zilarik_z · · Score: 1

    ... considering that having Windows on it would have driven up the price at least $100, just for WinXP Home; plus you can probably get away with lower system requirements running a Linux distro as opposed to XP.

    If I didn't need a bit more oomph and Windows, specifically, for my schoolwork, I would have picked one of these up instead of the Toshiba I ordered.

  77. what $500 can buy - an athlon 64 desktop by Splork · · Score: 1

    a nice Shuttle box Athlon 64 based system with 256mb, dvd burner and 80gb hdd.

    sure that doesn't include a display but its infinately more useful in the long term than this silly crippled C3 with a cd-rom.

  78. Re:But a little more gets you a much better machin by really? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but it's not sold with Linux preloaded. ;-)

    --

    "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  79. But a Beowulf Cluster of these babies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... still wouldn't impress me.

    Well, it had to be said.

  80. anyone with first-hand experience... by sootman · · Score: 1

    ...know if this VIA CPU & 128 MB RAM is enough to playback DivX or Xvid AVI DVD rips? Possibly if you drop the screen down to 800x600 or 640x480 @ 16bpp?

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:anyone with first-hand experience... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

      I used to run this CPU in a mini-itx box that I built.

      My box had 256MB of ram, and a DVD-rom drive.

      DVD, Divx, Xvid, etc... playback was poor. Don't consider it do-able for most viewing.

      The plus side is that it's running Linux, so you can 'prolly strip out most of the crap and get decent proformance.

      The down side is that it's a laptop. Shared memory bus and all that other crap.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  81. A lot more bang for your buck. by Mshift2x · · Score: 1

    $500 does seem like a cheap price, but due to price slashes from dell and other laptop manufacturers of new laptops down to prices as low as $599, you can get very good aftermarket laptops on online auction sites, ie, ebay, for less than $500 that will give you much more power for the same price. Know your options.

  82. another option by sootman · · Score: 1

    For $50 more they have an AMD 1.1 GHz Mobile Athlon 4 model with a bigger drive (40 vs 30) and DVD-ROM. Sweet! Now I just need an extra $550... :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  83. walmart destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Anyone who shops at WalMart is party to the destruction of the american middle class...

    Retail store wages are low because:

    1. High employee turnover
    2. Low skills needed
    3. Minimal education needed
    4. More job seekers than jobs
    5. Part time work schedules

    Having a union does not equate to significantly higher wages or benefits. Consider the unions in the hotel/casino industry.

    1. Re:walmart destruction by timjdot · · Score: 1


      You forgot
      6. US tax payers subsidize healthcare etc. for Wal-Mart employees. For corporate America there truly is a free lunch.

      BTW, VIA seems to have expat'ed from CA to Taiwan. Are all hardware companies now, for the most part, ex-USA?

      --
      Expect Freedom.
  84. Which C3? Nehemiah? by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which version of the C3 does this notebook use?

    Notebooks based the C3 come in two flavors: Ezra and Nehemiah. The Nehemiah at 1 GHz is almost twice as fast as the Ezra at 1 GHz.

    The tip-off would be the chipset, if it was known. The Nehemiah is almost always used with the CLE266 chipset with a 266 MHz FSB.

  85. and they also suggest.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a 1.2 ghz amd with a cd burner and xp home for $50 more.

    comes with a 64 mb mp3 player too.

    the linspire jobbie is nothing spectacular. educated shoppers would jump on the amd setup instead.

    1. Re:and they also suggest.... by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
      educated shoppers would jump on the amd setup instead.
      Maybe that's the plan. Nobody ever buys the absolute cheapest model. If they didn't have this then the AMD would be the cheapest and nobody would buy it. In six months they'll slash the prices down and dump these like ballast.
      --
      Clickety Click ...
  86. conspiracy theories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Honestly, WalMart is a smart business. They make money, they rule their space.

    Looking at their market (i.e. "red states"-- remember that the technophobes won the US election?), maybe this is a conspiracy to make folks go bonkers cause they can't "rip MP3s", "surf the web", IM their buddy, or watch a DVD movie, by supplying a cheap (though very mallable) device with no gizbang UI like XP. That is, keep them technophobes and stick with buying more (and more) cheaper consumer products. Those who learn how to run this laptop will escape the Walmart frenzy--which IS GOOD.

    Then again, I frequent a Walmart near work and I don't see a boat load of folks returning stuff considering 80% of what they sell is of poorer quality. That's how attics collect junk remember?

    1. Re:conspiracy theories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck you. just because people (including myself) didn't think john kerry was the answer to everything doesn't mean we are afraid of technology.

      move on, your 'party' was the one who sent the canidate that sent the weak canidate into the electi9on. maybe next time you all will send a canidate into the election that has a chance to win.

  87. It runs Linux, hooray. by compwiz · · Score: 1

    Doesn't look like anyone has anything good to say about this "Balance" company. One example:
    http://www.webservertalk.com/message4448 51-1.html

  88. Let me rent a thin client by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Hypothetical requirements of hypothetical home user that doesn't care about managing computers:

    Let me rent or buy a thin client with a CD burner, floppy, and local printer and scanner port, and let me rent the applications and storage that I need (advertiser-supported, probably). Plop this onto my DSL or cable modem and I'm set. Viruses? Not my problem. Security? Not my problem. Backups? Not my problem. Paying the bill, that's my only worry.

    How's this for a price list:

    DSL@0.75Mbps: $240/year, including modem
    OR Cable @ 3Mbps: $540/year, including modem

    Thin client PC, 1GHz Duron or equivalent (probably running a free OS in firmware): $150 or $20/month

    Printers, scanners - do-it-yourself from a long list of supported devices

    Software packages (prices lower, possibly free if ad-supported):
    Linux desktop/office package - $5/month, includes most of what a standard Linux desktop distro offers
    Linux server package - $varies based on resource usage
    MS-Windows packages - vary based on software but start at $20/month for MS-Windows XP with Open-source applications (Microsoft gets at least $10/month of that)
    Microsoft Office - $40/month for Microsoft Office XP, less for component parts. Reader programs are free.
    Security software: Included and maintained at no additional cost.
    Root/admin access: Other than as needed to configure printers and scanners, these are not available with this offering. We will be happy to sell you these services as part of our other offerings.
    All packages have resource limitations which most home users will not approach.

    Are these prices realistic? Can a vendor make money selling at these prices? Will a customer be willing to pay these prices?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  89. That's an understatement by Kjella · · Score: 1

    The ram's a bit scanty for any modern OS

    Granted, I'm a power user (no, not gamer on the laptop, but I tend to run several things at once) and the single biggest thing I'd like on my laptop is more RAM, and I got 256MB. It takes next to nothing to make it start swapping to disk. I use light-weight tools like textpad to do quick work so I don't have to deal with dogs like MS word (or Oo for that matter), simply because of RAM considerations.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  90. How ironic by poptones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because when I first saw the price and specs on the thing the first notion that popped into my head was trying one of them and putting ubuntu on it.

    Then I saw the other machine that has an "Athlon 4" CPU in it (whatever that is) for fifty bucks more and comes with built-in wireless networking. "Oh boy," I thought, and headed over there to check that one out. And of course, the one that has wireless networking comes with XP.

    Gonna be real easy "taking over the desktop market" when you can't even get installed in a machine with wireless networking support...

    1. Re:How ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Athlon4 is (was?) the first mobile version of the Athlon. It was actually the first release of the Palomino core, which ranged from ~1.4-1.8GHz in desktops (it came after Thunderbird and before Thoroughbred).

  91. uh...no no no by geneshifter · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't touch that with a 10m cattle-prod.

  92. For $50 more you get much more by Cow4263 · · Score: 1
    Check this out

    Its on sale for $548 and has the following improvements:
    • 1.1 GHz Mobile Athlon 4 Proc.
    • 802.11b networking
    • 40 Gig HD (+10 gig improvement)
    • DVD-ROM drive
    And, they even threw Windows (XP Home) on it. Better bang for your buck in my opinion (If they had a sans MS version for $25 or so less that'd be even better). I'd be interested in a review of these things.
  93. mnb Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run Windows 2K real smooth like on:
    Pentium 133 - 80 megs
    AMD K6-III 450 - 384 megs
    Pentium III-500 - 192 megs

    a 1Ghz C3 is faster than all of those.

  94. Re:low spec? what southbridge chip ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mini ITX boards featuring C3 have a CLE266 southbridge with mpeg assist hardware - if this has the same chip set then playing DVD's would be easy

  95. mnb Re:low spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is not ment as a flame, but I question whether this laptop would be adquate to play anything above and beyond mpeg-2. From my understanding the 1GHz VIA C3 peforms much like a medium speed pentium III and I found that a pentium III 766 was barely adquate for some divx-4 and xvid encodes.


    My AMD K6-III 450 w/384 megs of ram chokes on anything MPEG-4.

    My Pentium-III 500 w/192 megs of ram and a slow 4500 rpm HD can play even the highest bitrate MPEG-4s.

    What decoder are you using? ffdshow is the way to go if you aren't using it.
  96. What is in These Machines + Specs, Trusted? by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1
    It is a good price point, and looking around the accompanying WalMart links you see added RAM, other models with Wi-Fi, etc. Mind you, they are still enticingly priced---an extra $50, or an extra $100, etc. respectively. Even an option for an AMD Athlon 64 CPU. However.

    The Wi-fi is built-in, on the mobo. Fine. But, WTF is it? And will it work under Open/Free/Net-BSD? That is not a trivial matter? If it wont run them, it would be wasted money, for me. I have no idea what Faustian bargain, or licensing amnesia, Lindows(?) is offering for its OS, its bundled drivers, etc.? Mandrake has/does include Wi-Fi firmware that is not free. While I don't give a sh_t about that, I take under advisement that in the same vain, thus, wireless specs are unavailable, opaque, and therefore un-available to another free *nix. Plainly put, the sh_t might not run under OpenBSD, which matters to me.

    You guys buy these things, and then fill us in, what are they running? What chipset? Is that CPU REALLY what WalMart CLAIMS? BEWARE

    BTW, the more expensive, better AMD machines, for an extra ~$100 include not a *nix, but Windows XP. WalMart, boobie, come on, save at least, pass on at least, a good chunk of change by nixing or offering a better alternative. Weasely sh_t like that is how you guys destroy the competition, do a little destroying for me.

  97. 'fine' by bani · · Score: 1

    Ah, this is obviously some new usage of the word 'fine' I was previously unaware of.

  98. IBM makes pc keyboards with trackpoints. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Search the on-line vendors for "trackpoint" AND keyboard AND (PS/2 or USB)

  99. Back in February... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Back in February, HP was advertising the laptop deal that I bought... Mobile Athlon XP 2500+, 256MB PC 2700 SDRAM, 40GB HDD, 1024x768 15" LCD screen, 24x CD-RW/DVD-ROM, no WiFi built in, $699 after $400 in rebates. I've seen nothing cheaper in the past year, and anything else I've seen at $699 had a Celeron-M 330 processor, which my Athlon XP blows right out of the water. I bought a 802.11g PCMCIA card for $30 and a 512MB SODIMM from Crucial for $100, and a $30 case to carry it in, and it's been a great little laptop for me. I'd take it over this sub-$500 Linspire job, anyday. I run XP Pro and SuSE on my HP ze4610us and I really couldn't be happier for what I got, best value for the dollar.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  100. For $50 more you can get... by shrewmy · · Score: 0
    This..
    This item is only available online

    1.1 GHz Mobile AMD Athlon 4 processor with PowerNow! technology

    128 MB RAM, upgradeable to 640 MB*

    40 GB ATA 100/66/33 hard drive

    Supports 2.5V/1.25V 200-pin DDR200/DDR266 SO-DIMM module

    14.1" XGA TFT LCD with 1024 x 768 resolution

    16.7 million colors possible

    High-performance, 256-bit 3D graphic engine

    Shared memory 16/32/64 MB DDR (user-adjustable in BIOS)

    DVD-ROM drive

    Two built-in stereo speakers

    Integrated Wi-Fi-compliant Wireless 802.11b (11 Mbps) LAN

    On-board 1 GB/100M/10M Base-T LAN Ethernet, up to 1 Gbps

    56k V.90 modem

    Synaptics touchpad with 4-way scrolling button

    4 USB 2.0 ports, 1 RJ-11 modem jack, 1 RJ-45 Ethernet jack

    Line-out headphone jack

    1 microphone in jack

    1 external VGA port, 1 parallel port, 1 S-Video TV-Out connector

    1 DC-in jack for AC adapter

    Universal AC adapter with auto-sensing dual voltage support (AC 100-240V)

    BIOS plug & play, ACPI and DMI

    Kensington lock and BIOS password protection

    4-cell lithium-ion battery pack

    Pre-loaded with Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

    Dimensions and Weight: 13"W x 10.75"D x 1.5"H; weighs 6 pounds

    Still not the greatest deal, but AFAIK there's nothing comparable pricewise thats brand new?

  101. Dont get burned by Hardwyred · · Score: 1

    Be wary of these walmart laptops. I purchased one, come to find out the CPU was not what I was sold. When I confronted walmart, they told me that they never said what the CPU really was and just because AMD likes to call their chips one thing doesnt mean they have to comply! More at www.jasonandjessi.com/a535.html . Oh, and Im not the only one.

    --
    www.linux-skunkworks.com
    1. Re:Dont get burned by ebooher · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, he isn't the only one. Look here:
      http://www.webservertalk.com/message444851-1.html

      I've been in touch with a couple of other purchasers of this laptop now, and one of them agreed to break his warranty seal and investigate the ACTUAL part number etched on the CPU chip. He had the $598 model, advertised as an "Athlon XP-M 1600+". The actual OPN on his CPU is AHM1100AV53B, which if you refer to AMD's part# breakdown guide, is a 1.1GHz (not 1600+) mobile Athlon 4, not an XP-M.

      Though, I'm not sure you can blame this one on Wal-Mart. It isn't like it is a Wal-Mart brand named computer. They are buying it, just like all their other products, from a third-party manufacturer. Now, they may have a lot of muscle to lean in on that third-party, but ultimately it's a cheap knock-off being shipped in directly from Asia vs. the quality knock-offs with things like the IBM badge on them being shipped in directly from Asia.

      --
      "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
    2. Re:Dont get burned by Hardwyred · · Score: 1

      I agree, I had no bones with Walmart until I got this reply from them.

      ...We never stated or advertised what the processor speed was of the item. The name of the processor according to ECS is a AMD Athlon 1600+ pro. This is very similar to that of the AMD AThlon XPM 1600+...

      That's when my problem became with Walmart. They respond as if Im some sort of idiot and I'm supposed to thank them from protecting me from the big bad marketing drones on their own site! BTW, they did advertise that unit as an XPM, I kept a copy of the original add. When I sent it to them, they stopped responding to my emails.

      --
      www.linux-skunkworks.com
  102. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  103. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Much of healthcare's expense is welfare for lawyers. My ex, a general surgeon in rural Montana who had never been the subject of a lawsuit, was paying seven figures for her yearly liability insurance. Seven figures. That is frigging insane. She is an awesome, awesome surgeon, and she is not greedy by any means. At times, she took chickens in payment from the farmer folks. Sometimes pies - I liked the pies better, I have to say. Most - not some, but most - of her fees, when she got fees, went to the insurance companies. From there, they go to the lawyers, and their lawsuit-happy clients.

    The American people let the legislators pull the wool over their eyes by allowing absurd jury awards, shuffling personal responsibility off to the nearest set of (presumably) deep-pocket targets, and otherwise fostering the stupidity du jour. So mostly, I think they get what they deserve. Eventually, maybe they'll get up off their lazy asses and force the legislature to behave responsibly. I try, and I get a lot more done than you'd think since I can use $$$ as a lever, but it's not enough. The insurance companies and the lawyers have more.

    I'm a business owner. I pay for healthcare for all my employees. They get a full ride -- dental, eyes, health and life. You don't even want to know what it costs me. The only good news is I can still afford to do it. In about five years, if things keep going as they are, I'll be forced to raise our software prices, because there won't be any margin remaining to cover it. And that's for a product that technically has paid back our investment in it; originally, it was $499, and these days we sell the same thing, plus tons of upgrades done in the meantime, for $50 -- we're that far down the curve. It absolutely sickens me that the curve is reversing because of lawyers and other parasites.

    Gah. I hate this subject.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  104. who cares how many people use LINUX by rtphokie · · Score: 1

    So what does it matter how "mainstream" Linux gets. Does it change your use of Linux? Probably not.

    Is Linux in danger of going away? Does Linux need a large retailer like WalMart to keep it viable, I dont think so.

    So who cares whether consumers buy this $500 linux laptop or spend an extra $50 on the one that comes with XP?

  105. that laptop sounds like crap and too expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give me 1gb ram, 80gb hd, cdrw/dvd, native 1600x1200 for $800 and thats a *fair* price

  106. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...network adapter?

  107. Insulting the customer by cbr2702 · · Score: 1
    But less than 256 MB in a new computer is an insult to the customer.

    Example insult: "Hey retard! Your momma so dumb she..."
    Example bargain: "If you want it real cheap we can skimp on RAM. Your call."

    Remember: this is a $500 laptop

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  108. Missing the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who does not live in the USA, I do not give a shit who sells it.., or how much they ripped you off in the past while you worked with them in hopes of a 'career', the bottom line is!

    its the cheapest mobile computer, i have always been out of reach of a laptop financially - this is an awesome deal which ever way you look at it...

    take your big brand name computers and shove it up your ass.

  109. Imagine a BEOWULF cluster of these! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is so retarded it hurts.

    1. Re:Imagine a BEOWULF cluster of these! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, Netcraft announces its Imagining running a bewoluf cluster of our new laptop toting overlords on you... There now stop with the lame jokes for god sakes

  110. Quality product? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Wow. I wonder if it'll be a quality piece hardware like that crap "Durabrand" shit Wal-Mart sells. heh.

    Spend the extra $200 and get a Dell... quality is usually a bit better and at least you can get 24/7 support for the bloody thing.

  111. not a big dick computer by flaming-opus · · Score: 0

    computers are becoming consumer electronics devices. They're being sold by the same people and to the same people shopping for TVs and microwaves. Yes it's more fun to watch your crappy football team on a 42 inch plasma panel, but the bulk of TVs sold are still 24 inch crts for under $300. The bulk of microwaves cost under $50, and the most common stereos are still bookshelf/boombox systems that cost under $100.

    Technodorks are the minority. $500 is STILL far too expensive for a lot of people. For a lot of people the choice is often between buying a computer, or eating. Thus we have a digital divide where the poor in this country can't work a computer, and thus have fewer chances to get decent jobs, thus their children also won't have access to technology, thus...

    Even for those with the means, it's a comparison of value. What do you get out of your two thousand dollar laptop? How does it improve your life? Is that worth more than flying your whole family to visit your parents for christmas? Is that worth more than a whole new wardrobe and a lot of dinners and movie tickets? I'm reluctant to endorse anything walmart does considering how they treat their employees and what they do to small communities, however, I'm glad that this increases technology access to people who might not be otherwise able to afford it.

  112. perfect appliance by Exter-C · · Score: 1

    This could be the perfect appliance base. Use it as your media station no worries.. low on power and has a fast enough cpu (the C3 isnt as slow as people like to claim).

    It maybe a good replacement for my current media centre..

  113. Plain vanilla by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    Or apply to yogurt. Vanilla yogurt is good by itself, plain yogurt is good for cooking or with jam, and they are not at all the same.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  114. What I want to know is by Spatula+Sam · · Score: 1

    Yes, but does it run-

    Oh.

  115. Banking needs IE by cbr2702 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Or what about installing IE with Wine?

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
  116. Way too many penile WalMart Shoppers by TofuDog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dude, Why would you defend shopping at WalMart AND brag about going to private schools? That's like being born with a silver spoon and admitting you use it to re-position your Ben-Wah balls rather than snort coke off it like a good spoiled brat. If you are intelligent (and trust me the Ph.D. is no proof), try defending WalMart's economic and social impact as strongly as you defend your ego (e.g. sea & ski fag-oh, no stereotyping-actually I probably smoke you at both, sans the pretense). I'm almost (~1 year off) a Ph.D. (public education only) and I CAN skin a deer, and despite grad school poverty, avoid WallyWorld. Put that in your gamma distribution and stroke it.

    1. Re:Way too many penile WalMart Shoppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, he's probably old and bald, too.

  117. Overpriced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seems overpriced for what you get, but cheap nonetheless."

    This from a site that thinks an iPod is worth $300+

  118. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by wytcld · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you checked the breakdown of the precent of malpractice insurance that goes to lawyers, against the amount the insurance companies merely pocket? People get mad at the doctors, and get mad at the lawyers (I mostly avoid dealings with both myself), but how do the insurance firms avoid anyone noticing how incredibly much money goes to them - not just for malpractice, but for medical insurance itself. If you eliminated the insurance companies from the racket, it would cut something like 30% off our medical costs.

    As for the suits against doctors, the majority of suits are against just a few doctors in any state. The states where the medical association actually disciplines doctors they get complaints against end up with much lower malpractice insurance, because there's less malpractice, because in medicine as in most professions it's about 10% of the people who make 90% of the screwups. So what malpractice insurance gives doctors is the freedom from having to discipline their own. Start yanking licenses from the idiots, and the problem goes away. But of course the insurance firms don't want the problem to go away. They make money coming (medical insurance) and going (malpractice insurance).

    It's a protection racket.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  119. Selling Instructions by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    1. Get the price of that thing with WinXP Pro SP2.
    2. Replace WinXP with Linux, but don't change the price.
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!

  120. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And yet the two lawyers who ran for president this year would have everyone believe that lawsuits are just some miniscule cost involved with the health care industry. The fact is, it is all hidden behind other things and paid by the wrong people, just as you describe.

    I seriously hope Bush passes some tort reform.

  121. Installing software by cbr2702 · · Score: 1

    And a selling point of Linspire is the "Click 'n Run" catalog of "1,900 Programs you can use free!". See their marketing page.

    --


    This post written under Gentoo-linux with an SCO IP license.
    1. Re:Installing software by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      People who don't know the difference between Linux and Windows won't know any better. They will see an application they like at Wal-Mart and buy it, whether or not they have it in the OS. We've all fallen for the "shiny box syndrome" at some point in our lives. People who don't know the difference will just pick up a box and expect it to work, and it's not likely that a Wal-Mart employee would know any more than they do about the compatibility.

      You can say, they already have that, but it won't matter. It seems to me that most software targeted at the common user is an impulse buy. Again, I've fallen for it too, but I know the difference between OSes.

    2. Re:Installing software by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      People who don't know the difference will just pick up a box and expect it to work, and it's not likely that a Wal-Mart employee would know any more than they do about the compatibility.

      People are not as stupid as you think, and in many ways smarter than you.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  122. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should I like... break into Walmart to do this or what?

  123. Could be good by harryoyster · · Score: 1

    Walmart are probably only making around $200 on the system. But it still could be very good as a media centre plug it into the tv/use it to store music whatever.

    --
    Got a question about UNIX ask it here : Unix/xBSD Forum
  124. Red Hat Guru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that like an idiot savant?

  125. boycott wal mart by rawdirt · · Score: 1

    excessive support of Republican party has caused me to stop buying at wal mart.

  126. Thats right by geekoid · · Score: 0

    stupid american for demanding a better life.
    They should be like those nice people overseas who have to work 16 hours a day, and live in a mud hut while there employeres make billions, and charge there employees for rent, and food.

    I also like whent hey penelize a woirkers wages for goofing off. I mean really, who needs to pee every day?

    Besides it's goiod for us lazy Americans to see that all are goods are comning from other countries. Becasue we didn't need those jobs here, I mean we have the gall to want to live a decent life, with some non-work activities.

    Now lets see of all the wonderfull jobs you could have in America:

    There is software..no wait thats leaving
    Oh I know textiles..no no gone.
    Manufacturing! errr.. no
    MD! oh no, the 'free market' has made it very expensive to become one...even though there is a huge demand.
    Lawyer... errr wait, there is already a gluttony of lawyers, and as fewer and fewer people make a decent wage, fewer and fewer of them can affords a lwayer for even there basic protections.

    so we got the service industry who will sell to other people aming min. wage...

    We should be putting pressure on other countries so there workers can have a decent life, instead of letting there countries bring us down.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Thats right by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "We should be putting pressure on other countries so there workers can have a decent life, instead of letting there countries bring us down."

      Don't worry.

      Bush is going to bomb them when he gets around to it.

      That is, right after he drafts you back into the Army. He's a little short on bodies right now.

      (LIVE bodies, that is. No shortage of dead ones.)

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  127. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way back in aught 1, I had this idea that could change the world. Create the website www.TMMHC.com It seems the domain is unavailable so www.TMMHC.org should do. It stands for "The Mansions of Managed Health Care". People would be able to upload images of the homes of the wealthy Health Care Executives in their area. As Joe uninsured browses through the dozens of images of homes the size of JR Ewing's, a mass movement would be formed and quality healthcare thru grassroots drafted legislation would become affordable again. So..who is with me? utefan001@gmail.com

  128. RE: John... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I'm in total agreement with your conclusion. I've been saying that all along. But to me, this isn't (or shouldn't) be about making legislation to stop WalMart from doing business like they do, or even trying to boycott WalMart....

    It's simply an interesting study on what can happen to a business when they try to bite off more than they can chew. These stories all have the same basic theme. Small/new business starts producing product(s) that get them noticed, and eventually the big retail chain approaches them. The business sees $$$$'s and doesn't consider the long-term potential consequences of the deal. Then they get in over their head, and they cry to people about how the retail giant is mistreating them.

    I will say that this type of thing sends one clear signal to me. I do NOT want to ever work for WalMart (or any other large business with similar business philosophies). If they desire the "best possible purchase price", no matter what it means to their own suppliers, you better believe the same applies on the opposite end (the employees). They're going to want the most possible labor out of people for the least possible pay, and concepts like "making people happy so they perform better" are going to be pretty foreign to them.

  129. Red Hat Guru? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA HA HA HA HA! The expression "mutually exclusive" comes to mind.

  130. unimpressive specs by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    well, when I was young... oh fuck it.

    --

    -pyrrho

  131. Laptops by bugg_tb · · Score: 1

    Along side this nice new linux box, I have an old P133 laptop that still does the job nicely, abiword and twm does just fine.... who ever said that you needed the most powerful machine on the market???

  132. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Lando · · Score: 1

    Hmmm,
    The numbers you quote for liability insurance seemed a little off to me and thus I went a looking.

    A typical general surgeon in Wyoming paid on average $94k/annually for liability insurance. Wyoming has no cap on non-economic damages and as such is considered as a medical liability crisis state.

    Montana on the other hand has a cap of $250K on non-economic damages and while it is not as low as states such as California generally premiums do not exceed $30k/annually. The highest reported premium that I could find for a montana general surgeon was $54K/annually.

    I therefore think that you will have to provide some proof to your assertion that her insurance liability was over a million dollars a year.

    PS. I remember using your software back in '94, looking at your website looks like a lot of improvement has happened to what at the time I thought was a great product. It's nice to see that as the software paid for itself you lowered prices. Nice to see you still in business as well. I'm originally from Montana and it's nice to see a great software company running in my home state.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  133. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's a protection racket.

    I agree. However, the insurance companies can only do what they do because the chain of responsibility that turns the legislators into power brokers for the insurance companies enables them to.

    I see the chain of responsibility in this order:

    1. The people
    2. The political parties
    3. The legislators
      • The lawyers
      • The insurance companies

    The insurance companies have what amounts to a license to mint money. The legislators gave it to them.

    The lawyers also have a license to mint money, and the legislators gave it to them as well.

    The political parties only produce candidates that will toe the line and produce pork.

    The people give the political parties the the power to do this, and they have not moved to take it away.

    The legislature has in turn very carefully made it very difficult (with the single exception of California as far as I know) for the people to have any power whatsoever in changing how the system works. They do this by distracting the gullible majority with bullshit issues like drugs and "obscenity" and useless, unproductive wars in third-world countries, while they avoid dealing with healthcare and tort reform as if it was the plague. And of course, to them, it is the plague, because of the level of political pork that arises from the back room intercourse they engage in with the insurance industry. Screw that up, and they could lose income and the cushy job. And they know it.

    The tea went into Boston harbor for far less reason than all of this adds up to. American citizens are the ones bending over; so who can really blame the legislature if they go for a quick sample of ass? Stand up for yourself, vote the incumbents out of office -- no matter who they are -- next time around and send a coherent message. Or don't, and pay through the nose for your healthcare.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  134. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    No, there's a lot more to it than the liability for surgery. There's also the liability for the office staff (nurses and nurse-practicioners and so on, unless the surgeon doesn't have their own office -- she does, though) and general liability for non-surgical stuff, out-patient stuff and so on. It's not about just the one policy. It's about her total insurance bill, which was absolutely insane.

    But it goes deeper than this for the medical care consumer. Liability is applied at many levels, when you're talking about surgery. All of these fine folks have to carry liability:

    • any specialists that get their toes into the act
    • the surgeon and their MD and/or FACS assistants -- many surgeries involve multiple docs with knives and other instruments of torture
    • the anesthesiologist
    • the radiologist
    • the hospital
    • the lab
    • the clinic that hosts the doctor
    ...and it all folds into the fee you pay, because they can all be sued if something happens to you that your lawyer likes. On top of this, all of these people are trying to make a living, the hospital has to support what is really an astonishing infrastructure and so on -- the resulting prices are fubar.

    Now, I don't know about you, but I don't mind paying for top notch healthcare, the tools to implement it, and the facilities to perform it in. But I sure as hell mind paying for for a zillion dollar award because someone left a sponge in, or because some dipstick handed out the wrong meds. And that's what insurance is. It is us, paying for them.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  135. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that's what insurance is. It is us, paying for them.

    Hear, hear. If someone is *that* stupid, it's just not worth it to insure them. Make doctors who leave sponges in take them right back out, fix the patient up, and provide follow up medical care to deal with damages. For free. THAT will take care of malpractice faster than taking away their license. As it is, do they care if they leave a sponge in or not? They'll pay the same insurance rate either way.

  136. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fozzy(pro) · · Score: 1

    I ma not lawyer and well only no one lawyer who is retired and who I don't; like.

    Alright insurance costs are higher only slightly form lawsuits what the are up from is insurance groups back when US Healthcare was kicking I knew lots of execs that did very little and pulled in a lot of money ( like 450,000 and above )...the ceo made some ungodly amount...and the clerks there were paid well also but they did most of the work was done by them and middle management. Which made (35K start (not bad back then and well not to bad now, not livable in the Philly suburbs). Think about your car insurance and how it goes up, here where I live car thefts are at a record low, law suits for car accidents have lots of reforms so you can't make much money and insurance company liability is very limited....but rates are still very high and should be going down but the insurance groups are not doing that.

    Let's look at Vioxx now as Merck is another big player here. Merck pulled Vioxx not because it feared the government but because of lawsuits. The fda would prolly been satisfied with a warning label.

    Story 2....botched surgery...a coworker of my dads had surgery. Something was left inside...they wanted him to pay to remove it. One insurance company sued the other...he gets screwed and has to pay a $1000 or so out of pocket, some small amount of the total cost to remove said item and is under threat from insurance companies to be sued again.

    Lawyers do bear some burden, but not like the Insurance Companies

  137. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  138. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... we all know that Wal Mart is evil.

  139. So who's taking the hit? by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry to sound like a wet blanket, but there have been past stories about how walmart pressurizes it's suppliers to lower costs to the point of even bankrupting them. So, what I'm wondering is, who is it this time? Sure, it's great to have a laptop for less than $500, but hey, is some poor guy suffering to provide this pricing? or not? Anyone?

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:So who's taking the hit? by saider · · Score: 1

      More than likely this is a small company in asia which is throwing together a bunch of old/cheap components to get a "notebook computer". Chances are that the display is crap, as well as the chassis. The disk drive is probably an old model, which does not really matter for this application (as long as it does not crash). If it is like any of their other "no-name brand" products, paying $500 is too much. Spend the extra $200 or so and get a basic HP or Toshiba. Much better value.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  140. oh my !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine a boewolf cluster

  141. mod up by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    This is the problem with walmart including the example from the parent message earlier about a gallon of pickles costing $2.97.

    The company that did this was strong armed by walmart after a chinese company claimed they could supply walmart that amount of pickles for under $3.

    Walmart then arm twisted all their pickle manufactors to match the price or be banned from the shelves.

    Most brand names refused and realized they would go under if they could sell the pickles to Walmart for that price except for one brand name manufactor.

    I do not remember the company name but sure enough they went bankrupt after trying to sell the pickles for the $2.97.

    Walmart is having a negative effect on the market. Manufactors are forced to never raise prices for products despite inflation not to mention are forced production oversea's, required to scale up product to a point that they will go under if they cancel walmart, to lowering living standards.

    They are a monstor corporation and have the GDP of most governments. In essence they are becoming a government themselves if they are the sole distributor of 50% of all goods according to some economists.

    1. Re:mod up by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Walmart is having a negative effect on the market. Manufactors are forced to never raise prices for products despite inflation

      I read that this was one explanation for the proliferation of countless pointless variants on the same product; the 'variant' is a 'new' product, and puts the manufacturer in a stronger position when it comes to negotiating.

      I don't live in the US, so I don't know how often companies change products there, though.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  142. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by fyngyrz · · Score: 1
    Ack. I didn't mean to ignore your comments about our software -- thank you very much for your kind words. Much appreciated.

    Also, I'm going to touch base with the ex and see if I can't get some exact figures -- I was quite sure of them until you disputed them, now I'm wondering. It's been about eight years, but she still talks to me. Sometimes.

    :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  143. BETTER cheap laptops by evilviper · · Score: 1

    Walmart has FAR BETTER notebooks available, for just slightly more money.

    If you are getting this laptop, you are telling Walmart you are willing to pay MORE for LESS if it says "Linux" on it...

    Let's compare this $500 Lindows notebook with the $550 Windows XP notebook also sold at Walmart.com

    $500 Lindows_ $550 Windows
    1.0GHz Via C3_1.1GHz AMD mobile XP
    CD-ROM_ _ _ _ DVD-ROM
    30GB HDD_ _ _ 40GB HDD
    4-cell Batt_ _4-cell Batt
    ??_ _ _ _ _ _ 1Gbps NIC
    ??_ _ _ _ _ _ DDR RAM
    ??_ _ _ _ _ _ 802.11b WiFi
    ??_ _ _ _ _ _ S-Video TV-out


    I hope that's clear enough. First of all, Walmart needs to update the info for their new cheapo system. The fact that they are conviently omitting lots of important info indicates it may be missing key functionality.

    In addition, even if all the Lindows notebook's ???? are really equivalent to the Windows XP counterpart, you'd still be stupid to get the Lindows notebook, with a smaller hard drive CPU about half as fast (Via C3s are vastly underperforming) and lacking a DVD-ROM. Not to mention that Windows XP might be of some value. It's definately worth spending the extra $50 to get the FAR better notebook.

    Words cannot describe how much I HATE the slashdot lameness filter.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  144. Makes linux look expensive by herrison · · Score: 1

    Right now the next model up (at $548) includes * wifi * dvd-rom * winxp - http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product _id=3163026

    --
    You know what I miss? Leeches.
    1. Re:Makes linux look expensive by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And a decent processor. Notice that it has a 1.1 Athlon, as opposed to a 1GHz C3? That C3 has SUCKASS performance, especially when compared to a P3 or Athlon.

  145. Although it's probably been said... by AusG4 · · Score: 1

    Although it's probably been said... they are also offering, for $50, a notebook with an Athlon CPU and Windows XP Home.

    How, exactly, is this Linspire machine a good idea/deal?

    --
    bash-3.00$ uname -a
    SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    1. Re:Although it's probably been said... by AusG4 · · Score: 1

      That is "$50 more", of course.

      --
      bash-3.00$ uname -a
      SunOS panda 5.10 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2
    2. Re:Although it's probably been said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then it answers you own question. This costs $50 more.

  146. Astroturf -- 7 figures ... counting in cents. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is serious astroturfing. Bullshit ex pays that much; on average, for surgeons, the malpratice insurance is $86,400. And this number is from a pro-bush, anti-lawsuit organization. The fact is, Lawyers play a valuable role in product saftey; without Lawyers, we would need to rely on more government regulation and oversight. This is pro-lawyer stand (from neoconservatives even!) is expressed nicely at In Defense (sort of) of Trial Lawyers. This person's scare tactic of "7 figures" is probably counting in cents.

  147. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if some drunk doctor left a sponge in you, do you think you'd want to let him "try again"?

  148. But then there is no insurance by lilmouse · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but if you take the insurance companies out of the picture, they can't cover any malpractice, and if a doctor screws you over, you can't do a darn thing about it.

    Yeah, if someone repeatedly makes mistakes, yank his license, but we need the malpractice insurance.

    --LWM

    1. Re:But then there is no insurance by FuzzyPat · · Score: 1

      Uh, why can't we "do a darn think about it"? There are plenty of lawyers who are willing to sue the doc with or without malpractice insurance.

  149. pathetic commie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Capitalism is destroying society"

    HAHAHAHA...capitalism MADE society you drugged out welfare loser...don't like it? go back to your cave, knuckle-dragger.

    "(since I'll never be able to rise to the top of the capitalist heap) is try to prepare for a life of abject poverty."

    uhmm...no...that's because you're a pot-headed hippie

  150. HA! socialist marx-licker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're drunk on capitialisim,"

    Better drunk on capitalism than dead on socialism/communism

  151. Not too shabby by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
    Now if it just had wireless, it'd make a nice little CLI-only station to browse the web, read mail & news and do some sysadmin work from.

    Imagine being able to work from a bar, bookstore or coffeeshop: heaven!

  152. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > yet the two lawyers who ran for president this year would have everyone believe that lawsuits are just some miniscule cost

    Tell me, how many court cases has Bush argued?

  153. Capitalism?? by Lachek · · Score: 1
    While Wal-Mart may be a symptom of capitalism, I would be hard pressed to hold it up as the shining example of our time. A healthy capitalist system relies on competition on all levels - from manufacturing to suppliers to retailers. This way the suppliers can have their pick of manufacturers, retailers can have their pick of suppliers and consumers can have their pick of retailers. The Wal-Mart phenomenon creates a virtual communism within a capitalist system - a sort of "Ministry of Plenty" run by a corporation with profit and market dominance as its only goals.

    You may preach the gospel of free market liberalism as you will - and I will not be in contradiction - but the fact of the matter is that Wal-Mart is not a fair player. The irony of capitalism is that it's a system that only works well if there is competition, but where every player is supposed to attempt to achieve monopoly. Well, Wal-Mart won. As far as many market segments go they have no competition. They may have achieved this goal by fair competition, by being faster, better, leaner and meaner than their competitors. But however fair the method of achieving this dominance was (and I'm sure there are arguments, and possibly evidence, to the contrary) that doesn't make the end result to the economy and society any more appealing.

    Since Wal-Mart maintains a dominant position in many fields of retail, and packs a considerable wallet to boost, they are able to manipulate the system just like a government entity can. A governmental body responsible for a plan-based economy could refuse to buy from a supplier and thereby put it out of business. Wal-Mart can threaten a supplier similarly, but also has the resources available to compete even with other monopolies and trusts by starting their own manufacturing of products they have problems acquiring at a "good value". When such a dominance has been achieved, Wal-Mart can (and have) start to play the meta-economy game of labour management, sales tax, logistics and surveillance, social behaviours and, let's not forget, globalisation.

    When you control a small city's or county's workforce, you can maintain a "healthy" level of control by controlling the unemployment rate - since there are no employers to compete with you, you can ensure that your employees don't ask for higher wages and benefits, and you can ensure that they are sufficiently afraid to form unions to help them. This keeps costs down and allows you to maintain a "good value".

    When you have expanded enough in an area that neighbouring counties is suffering because their residents don't shop (or work) locally, you can strike some nice deals with the local government for land and property to bring the business back. Of course, the county wouldn't have had to give these incentives to smaller retail businesses and thus its residents still lose out - except for the good value they'll be getting at Wal-Mart.

    As you grow in the retail industry, total control / panopticon technologies such as RFID tags, international inventory and sales trend analysis and complete data warehousing become gradually more cost-effective. The detrimental effect of these technologies are well known and I need not go into detail for the /. crowd. Similarly, economies of scale and control of both production and retail mean that you can mass manufacture something centrally (with a large impact on the environment) and then ship it to every warehouse (with a large impact on the environment) cheaper than if you were to manufacture and sell the product locally in many different places. In Wal-Mart's case, the effect is truly extreme as entire cities spawn and crumble at the whims of Wal-Mart's procurement arm.

    When you control the retail industry, you control the buying habits of consumers. When you control the buying habits of consumers, you control where and for what they shop. If consumers want a certain product that Wal-

  154. You are ALL simplistic morons (no offense) by bechthros · · Score: 1

    Hey kids, did it ever occur to any of you, on either side, that maybe the best thing isn't to have ONLY competition, or ONLY cooperation, but maybe some fucking BALANCE?!?! You are ALL trying to argue that the coin should only have one side! There are times and places that competition is important. There are certainly times and places that cooperation is important as well. Every workplace, every friendship, and every band I've ever been in has, at times been competitive. And at other times, they've also been cooperative. This is the way of the world, people. Male and female. Democrat and Republican. Night and day. Heads and tails. Light and shadow. Ford and GM. NEVER will ANY of these completely eradicate the other. Existance is dualistic and cyclical. Cooperation and competition are both equally and immensely important to a person's well-being, and neither could exist without the other, because they define each other by opposition. Both the CCCP and Dickensian England were completely unsustainable for precisely this reason - the one believed solely in cooperation while the other believed solely in competition. And both were eventually compelled to make radical changes in their society. The thing that has always made America great has been our ability to compromise, we lose that at our peril.

    So suck it up, quit pretending that there's only one right answer, quit acting like spoiled children who just want their way... and BALANCE!!!!!

  155. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Lando · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the clarification. As I read your previous comment I assumed that the insurance was for merely one person. I can definately see insurance pushing into the millions for the support of a staff.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  156. Yes, but... by everdred · · Score: 1

    ...can it run Deer Hunter 2003?

  157. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  158. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    I think he's talking about Edwards and Kerry.

  159. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Much of healthcare's expense is welfare for lawyers.

    No, that would be welfare for the insurance industry.

    My ex, a general surgeon in rural Montana who had never been the subject of a lawsuit, was paying seven figures for her yearly liability insurance.

    From your other post, those aren't her personal costs for being a surgeon, those are the costs of running a business. If the entire liability for all the employees gets counted as your sister's personal liability, then its only fair that the wages of all the other employees are counted as only your sister's wages.

    The American people let the legislators pull the wool over their eyes by allowing absurd jury awards, shuffling personal responsibility off to the nearest set of (presumably) deep-pocket targets, and otherwise fostering the stupidity du jour.

    Nonsense. Trying to get *rid* of large damage awards is "pulling the wool over people's eyes". Instances of enormous negligence or incompetence require enormous consequences, or they'll just keep happening again. As if the doctor who amputated the wrong leg from a man, or the girl who died after a doctor transplanted an organ of the wrong blood type don't deserve to be sued for millions of dollars. Limited awards mean limited liability, and if liability is limited, doctors will be free to be sloppy and corners will be cut to save money.

    States that have "tort reform" haven't lowered their medical costs, they've only allowed for sloppiness and pushed responsiblity back onto the consumer. Lawyers and lawsuites aren't the cause of high medical costs, they're a byproduct. Want to see insurance go down, tackle the insurance companies and take medical licences away from bad doctors.

  160. What it should have by martinultima · · Score: 1

    Ideally, I think that such a system should be loaded with a real Linux distrobution. Then it would be a lot better.

    By the way, anyone who thinks that you need a fucking kick-ass gaming system just to run OOo is wrong!! My desktop system is 566MHz with 256MB RAM, and my laptop is a 133MHz Pentium with 80MB!! Both of them run Slackware with X and XFCE just fine. (And yes, OpenOffice.org runs on both quite nicely, even with huge documents and several other programs running.) The specs for my systems are available here.

    Honestly, I think that the only reason the Wal-Mart systems seem so slow is because everyone's used to Micro$oft and Lin$pire $tandard$ ...

    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  161. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by hesiod · · Score: 1

    Oh, he said "Two lawyers ran for president," Edwards wasn't "running" for anything. After posting, I realized he might have been referring to other parties or primaries, but couldn't think of who he would have meant.

  162. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Oh, he said "Two lawyers ran for president," Edwards wasn't "running" for anything. After posting, I realized he might have been referring to other parties or primaries, but couldn't think of who he would have meant.

    Hrm? What do you mean he didn't run for anything? Edwards finished #2 in the primaries, losing to Kerry, but he beat Dean, Gephart and the general dude who's name I cant remember.

  163. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > the general dude who's name I cant remember.

    General "Redface," Wesley Clark :)

    > What do you mean he didn't run for anything? Edwards finished #2 in the primaries

    Derrr, oh yeah. <BACKPEDAL, BACKPEDAL> When I said Edwards wasn't running for anything, I was thinking of him as the VP candidate.

  164. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Derrr, oh yeah.

    Hey, you were right about Clark. :) Why is he called Redface?

  165. Re: Healthcare as a business expense by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > Why is he called Redface?

    You can tell when he starts getting mad, his face turns bright red... and he shouts a lot :)