Slashdot Mirror


The H-1B Swindle

An anonymous reader writes "A new study shows that companies hire foreign workers for cheap labor, not skill." From the article:"When you look at computer job titles by state, California has one of the biggest differentials between OES salaries and H-1B salaries. The average salary for a programmer in California is $73,960, according to the OES. The average salary paid to an H-1B visa worker for the same job is $53,387; a difference of $20,573 ... H-1B visa workers were also concentrated at the bottom end of the wage scale, with the majority of H-1B visa workers in the 10-24 percentile range. 'That means the largest concentration of H-1B workers make less than [the] highest 75 percent of the U.S. wage earners,' the report notes. "

719 comments

  1. Well, Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Duh! Who'd imagine that?

    1. Re:Well, Duh! by Retric · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having RTFA I wonder how much of the "Duh this has to be true" concept effected their research. They seem to focus mostly on jobs title vs. looking at years of experience or education vs. pay. I think there would be more value in comparing people with the same relative experience who got their final degree be it BS, MS, or PHD from the same school to each other before saying.

      "Abuse is by far more common than legitimate use,"

      PS: This might be true but I think this has more to do with H1B's being less mobile as far as switching jobs than outright abuse vs. US citizens.

    2. Re:Well, Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trying to introduce science and logic into this...everyone on /. knows that companies are supposed to be moral and altruistic, never worry about pesky business ideals like making money, and should only hire domestic workers (as long as "domestic" means they're workers from the US) at a very high salary. /endsarcasm

      This is hardly a story at all and quite a few assumptions had to be made in order to do the analysis in the first place (based on the description of the process in the article). Looks like yet another "I Am Not a Statistician, But I Play One On TV" (IANASBIPOOTV) report with flawed analytical methodology.

      That isn't to say that the conclusion isn't true, but I'd hardly call this a noteworthy study.

    3. Re:Well, Duh! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are imported to ease the pressures in the supply-demand ratio. So one would expect their salaries to be lower.

      Although I'm sure that's minor compared to that the company that pays them also sponsors their visas and renewals, thus granting them an awesome, plumb opportunity here in the US that they would not jeopardize.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Well, Duh! by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      vs. looking at years of experience or education vs. pay

      Why should an employer look at those two things when job performance should be the primary salary measurement? We just let a unix admin go who had 20+ years of "experience" and a college degree. That means 20+ years of screwing up servers in DC's accross the continental US. Nice guy, but I wouldn't let him touch a PC with a 10 foot pole.

      In contrast, I've been in the industry since 94. I have no diplomas (not even high school), but have "the mother-f'ing force" when it comes to working with huge app clusters and complicated enterprise applications.

      BBH

      To my educational credit, I was a professional cook before getting into computers....

    5. Re:Well, Duh! by Wavicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      H1-B's are not supposed to be imported for the lower-tech jobs unless there is a scarcity of native talent for those lower-tech jobs. H1-B's are expected to be as trained, or more so, than their American counterparts. That's what the Benedict Arnold CEO's keep telling us - the supply of US tech talent is lacking. They have to import highly qualified people to continue innovating.

      If what you say is true - H1-B's are less skilled - then the author's argument is strengthened.

      Most people in the tech market today tend to feel that H1-B's are really being used to decrease salary pressure. If you're qualified but demand $80,000/yr, well they can just hire an H1-B at $60,000/yr. That's not what H1-B's are for.

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    6. Re:Well, Duh! by wolenczak · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I was considering leaving computers and devote fulltime to cooking. hehe

    7. Re:Well, Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law requires H-1B workers to be paid the prevailing wage for the occupation and location: PERIOD.

      Experience and education is not part of the equation.

    8. Re:Well, Duh! by techdhasu · · Score: 1

      comapnies use education credentials and experience as benchmarks for filtering out the obvious misfits. some of them are exceptions like in your case where the force was with you. However I dont think companies have time to look in restaurent kitchens and soliciting sweaty chefs for their next super sys-admin. :)

    9. Re:Well, Duh! by Retric · · Score: 1

      You have to understand the amount of experience / education someone has tends to correlate with there overall usefulness. I am more useful now than I was 3 years ago because I learned something and I was slightly more useful after collage than before.

      Now some people are not going to become competent just because they do something for 20 years and others are going to grow bored after a while and not really care but overall on average relevant experience and education tend to help people do their jobs. Which is why people tend to get paid more when they have more experience doing it (up to a point)

      Thus when looking at large groups of people when I group them by years of exp I will probably find that more exp = more pay. Now I know a lot of H1B's and most of them have far less experience than the average US coder but more education. I think H1B's average about 5-10 years less real world experience than the non H1B coders in my company so I would expect the H1B's to be paid less because of that.

      PS: I know we look for cheep H1B's, but there is a basic cost to the H1B program which adds to the cost of hiring them. There is also language and cultural issues that add to the overall cost, but if you want a clear picture we should be looking at more than just the job title. My guess is that experienced H1B's get paid close to but less than the non-H1B people after considering the costs of the H1B program. (You also need to ignore jobs that require security clearances, which H1B's are ineligible for and tend to pay more.)

    10. Re:Well, Duh! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen of the hiring of H-1Bs, there is no actual "competitive vetting" process occurring. The US Corp. simply approaches - or is approached by - an outsourcing firm, which brings in the supposedly qualified software engineer types for said project. Usually, it's a miracle if they don't royally screw things up....

    11. Re:Well, Duh! by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      Having just delivered an enterprise application marketed by a Fortune 100 company, which was co-designed by myself and another employee ( who turned out to be an H1B ), I can PERSONALLY vouch for this process. Mind you, we lucked out, but that's because myself and another guy at the company did his technical interview, and the (so-called) Director didn't get involved other than to "cull the herd" of resume's.

      Hint: The guy who was finally brought in, was the 6th person we had interviewed for the position, having gotten resumes from Monster, HotJobs, and a couple of recruiting firms. It took 8 months to bring him in. Mind you, there WERE other folks who we interviewed who WERE qualified, but frankly, from what I understand of their reaction to a job offer ( those who were even offered a job ), the salary they were offered was SIGNIFICANTLY lower than what the position called for.

  2. This is news? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone who has been in the computer industry for more than a few months knows this. Its prevalent everywhere. Don't let them say "there aren't enough engineers to go around", thats pure horse hockey. HIB workers arre cheaper, plain and simple.

    1. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The study does not mention age. That is an important factor in remuneration, I understand. It is
      dishonest in my opinion to ignore it. On average, H1-Bs are younger (they get a green card later)

    2. Re:This is news? by BYC(VCU.EDU) · · Score: 2, Informative

      This hasn't been news since 1997.

    3. Re:This is news? by deanj · · Score: 1

      Longer than that. At least since the mid-80s.

      They'll even get people in country, tailor job listings so specifically that only the H1B can be hired under it, and then not pay them the wages other workers would get. Shameful.

    4. Re:This is news? by deaddrunk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      White people are an annoying drop on the bottom line to short termist morons in charge of corps. They haven't yet realised that we nasty expensive westerners are the ones that buy their output, but no doubt it'll occur to them eventually.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    5. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      Employers seek more value per cost. Employees seek higher pay per effort. Anyone who says "there aren't enough engineers" is just saying "I want to pay less". (Join the club.) But on the other hand, employees who say "we have plenty of engineers" is just saying "I want to be paid more". (Join the club.)

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    6. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon to keep from getting fired.

      Many of the lower management and "IT/IS" staff in the chicago office are H1b's specifically for that reason. they tried hiring people locally and they could not get someone to accept the job at a pay rate that only allows you to live in the south side in the slums. (skimp on the tech labor but pay the management more than they are worth is the status-quo) So me being in a different office has to deal with these people. I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND their horrible english and extremely thick accent. it is a complete waste of time talking to them and when it comes to major projects that require intimate knowlege of the company's working they stand around and say "idunno" or hide behind vendor specifications. The rest of us go ahead with figuring things out (1/2 our staff for the project are these guys we can not communicate with outside email or written communication and are unwillnigto think outside the box) to the point we end up doing all the work and they stand there saying ... "oklooksgood"

      companies see H1b as dirt cleap tech labor. a reason to not pay a living wage in metro areas like Detroit, chicago, atlanta, etc... if they can underpay by 20-30K and the h1b's are superoverjoyed for that low pay rate, they do it.

      A IT guy working the printers and tech support NEEDS $54K in chicago to not live in the slum-shit-hole and these companies rather give that cash to the director of thumbs up his ass than the guy doing the actual work.

      do I sound pissy? yup.

      Now, there is one H1b in denver that knows his stuff and is a huge credit to the company. unfortunately he is the minority, most are not that good.

    7. Re:This is news? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nah, white people are a violent, troubled minority. The source of almost all crime and the majority of terrorist attacks. They are unpatriotic (less likely to defend their country in the armed forces) and overpaid.

      Kick the bums out, I say!

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    8. Re:This is news? by msmercenary · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm just at the wrong company, but I've never seen this. All workers here are paid based strictly on merit, skillset, and responsibility.

      One thing I notice: The "programming" profession has an extremely wide range of applicable skills, from the just-out-of-college I-know-C++ entry-level programmer to the twenty-year veteran with a proven record of solving complex problems and writing solid components. Of course these two are going to have a pay disparity. And any H1B workers that have spent enough time programming in the U.S. to have attained the latter status have also spent enough time to shed their H1B status and become citizens.

      Perhaps the reason that H1B's, on average, get paid less, is that, on average they fill more of the entry-level positions.

    9. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet every single thing worth a damn that you see around you? Dead white guys made it.

    10. Re:This is news? by otisg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been in the industry for about 10 years now, always surrounded by H-1B workers. They've all been WELL paid (software field). Moreover, INS (now USCIS) has a prevalent wage requirement for H-1B workers. I believe that wage is about $75K for software engineers currently. Thus, any employer offering a salary below this rate to a software engineers should/would be denied the H-1B visa.

      So, I'm not sure if what you are saying is really true, or.... I'm not going to get into that.

      --
      Simpy
    11. Re:This is news? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1
      from the just-out-of-college I-know-C++ entry-level programmer to the twenty-year veteran with a proven record of solving complex problems and writing solid components.


      Well, there was the study earlier this year that showed the top (quality) programmers were 4x as productive as the average ones, and the there were programming things they could do that the average ones could not, no matter how long they were given.

      There needs to be a way to show this, and I don't mean topcoder.com, where you write stuff so they can sell it.
      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    12. Re:This is news? by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree.

      You wrote exactly what I was going to write.

      There is no shortage of I.T. workers, only a shortage of I.T. workers at a cut rate wage.

    13. Re:This is news? by demachina · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Its been this way for a decade or two. Not only can you underpay foreign workers, but you can COUNT on obedience and servility from them. Their entire existence is completely dependent on their boss and the company they are working for. If they get laid off or fired, unless they can find a new employer immediately they lose their visa and are out of the country or turn illegal, their homes and families shredded in the process. This leads to them working large quantities of uncompensated overtime, never complaining, never questioning their superiors no matter how wrong their superior is. Their is a con job that its just because Indian workers are better, harder workers, well its also because their employers have them by the short hairs and everyone knows it.

      Being a wage slave at this point just completely sucks. You are screwed coming and going because the world has completely turned in to an employer's market. Employer's can outsource, they can import H1-B's, they can hire illegal aliens whom are intentionally being let in to the country in the millions to insure cheap subservient low end labor. The political party in power in the U.S. now is completely pro business and the Democrats are close behind. The Republican's once again just voted down an increase in the minimum wage. The minimum wage hasn't gone up since 1996-97, how much inflation has there been in that time. How much more are you paying for gasoline and home heating this year. Try to live in the U.S. on $5.15/hr much of which goes in to payroll taxes.

      Bottomline is if you have a clue you are going to jump to self employment because if you are working for a boss you are pretty much already screwed and its gonna get worse with every passing year. When politicians, Democrat and Republican, bought and paid for by big business, dismantled trade barriers workers in the U.S. were doomed. H-1B and illegal immigration likewise are anti worker perks big business is paying politicians to do for them.

      Amazingly workers completely outnumber employers in this country but workers are consistently suckered by issues like abortion, gay bashing, "The War on Terror" in to voting people in to office who are going to completely screw them where it counts, in the work place and in the pocket book.

      --
      @de_machina
    14. Re:This is news? by sapped · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am an H-1B holder and can confirm this. Moreover H1's usually need a few years of experience to get into the country as well. I am often amongst the best paid people in the office because I am often one of the most experienced people.

      As others have pointed out the data is probably very skewed time wise. My recently approved green card application was for experience and salary levels from 2001 due to some quirky laws around the application.

    15. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that the reason for discrepancy is the existence of "sweat shops" who outsource H1B workers and pay them low wages. In all decent companies I know about H1B folks were quite good and paid well.

      I guess that is what this systems needs - some requirements about what positions H1B can be used to fill and prohibition on using them as contractors. Completely losing the ability to bring in a good guy solely based upon his citizenship would be a bad public policy for U.S.

      Just make sure that best and brightest are indeed best and brightest.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    16. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think your point is valid, and much closer to the truth than a lot of this scaremongering.

      I came to the US in 1997 on an H1B at a starting salary of 80k with a few years experience. By no means was that a low salary. 30k later, and I have a green card so I don't get counted in the H1B figures.

      My experience has been that while there may be no shortage of people who can code in a computer language, there is a shortage of _quality_ programmers. During the boom, that is what drove the H1B influx, not some desire to save cash, at least in Silicon Valley. These days however I see more companies unwilling to fund an H1B application and require people who already have work authorization. Probably there are plenty of green card holding ex-H1B's left over from the boom.

      Look to the Universities and what they are churning out: Java programmers with barely a whimsical understanding of the basics of CS. You better believe these guys won't get hired into places that are looking for top talent.

    17. Re:This is news? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I second that. You don't have to give them raises, you can cut their benefits, you can spit on them, they'll still love you and kiss your butt because it is much much better than having to get back home. I have seem that many times. But once a few of them get their green cards and make their way into management they become nasty and vicious. At the expense of burning all my karma and offending all the Polital Correctness whores, I'll say that would never want to work for a Chinese, Indian or Russian boss. They've been kicked around as graduate students or as H1B workers and then they feel like they need to pay back and want to fuck everyone around them who is not from thier own part of the world.

    18. Re:This is news? by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      I work in immigration law (IANAL). The HUGE problem with this study is that it does not take into account responsibility & experience, while H-1B wage calculations do.

      The OES lists four levels for every occupation imaginable (fence erector for example). The levels are based on the amount of responsibility you have in the job and the requirements of the position in terms of specific skills, experience and education. Thus are pretty strongly, if indirectly, correlated to experience. The wages also vary greatly across the experience levels. For example A level 1 "Computer Programmer" in San Diego makes $48,610 a year, while a level 4 job with the same title earns you $80,434 a year.

      Now to me this means H-1b hires are generally more entry-level than the average worker (duh!). That's not saying that there probably isn't a fair bit of fraud and misrepresentation of the level of a position, especially since the employer sets the level themselves and then documents the requirements, but it's not happening on an industry-wide level as the article would have you believe.

    19. Re:This is news? by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      I am not going to touch the first paragraph. Immigration is a big deal for me, and I have no idea how to solve it. I just don't know. I feel certain, however, that it is better here than where they came from.

      Yes, it IS an employer's market, and that's the way it is. I am NOT being paid what I'm worth, because the organization has at least 50 qualified people ready to step in and take my job. Why should they pay me more when I am willing to work for what I get now? If I don't like it, I am free to go work somewhere else, where I may not get paid much more, but the cost-of-living isn't so heinous.

      So what would you suggest? The legislature vote me a raise? (Yes, I do work for the state, but my pay is controlled by the county. It's complex.) So they vote me a raise, that money must come from somewhere (the taxpayer, or the department of transportation, or child and family services (oh wait, that's still the from the taxpayer)). Also, my job is impossible to outsource, so there is no danger of my job being given to someone in India, so I am not living under that particular danger.

      So if they somehow force companies in the USA to pay all their workers more (like these H1B people getting saaries equal to their citizen colleagues), then the companies have few qualms about having some Indian or Mexican do their job. That makes business sense for the company (less $), and good deal for the Mexican (they don't come to the USA for the beaches, I can tell you that). I guess with IT jobs, it would probably be more likely to be shipped to India. They apparently would sell a limb to earn half of what I get every year.

      So who would you prefer hold you by the short hairs? The government or your boss? You want to be held on to by neither? Go start your own business, and have the consumer hold you by the short hairs. It's part of life.

      I guess my point is that this is the WAY IT IS today. It is not likely to change.

      As for the minimum wage, if you make the grocery store owner pay is employees more, who is going to take it in the shorts? The grocery store owner is not going to sell his camp trailer to pay the increased wage, he is going to raise his prices.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    20. Re:This is news? by skubeedooo · · Score: 1
      And don't say there isn't enough oil/gold/ ... it's just that it's too expensive. But I suppose everyone already knows this.

      When you realise that tech companies ask for more students to go through american universities and for more people in general to take up programming, it is for the same reason that the US tries to persuade OPEC nations to pump more oil. When seen in this light none of this seems particularly surprising (or evil, for that matter).

    21. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not resist adding my opinion here...

      I am a H1B holder in the Silicon Valley area. I started at a "low" 70k and in 4 years (based on my performance I believe) moved to 90k+. I actually can see the difference with the other guys (ie. citizens) based solely on my preparation/qualifications (also my common sense helps around here)... So yeah some H1Bs get less salary but usually that's not the reason we get hired... A good number are simply more qualified, do the job and bluff/show off less... Also I guess the idea of some (most?) companies that are looking for engineers is to hire REAL engineers and no high school/BAs with some experience in programming and that feel they're close to the next big thing because they can do HTML... So get real.

      If you can't get a reasonable salary be objective and check if you're qualified, if you tend to overstimate your capabilities (don't ask your parents), I know a number of guys that think that just because they're citizens, the companies they work for should give them more money, just because they know some IT stuff... Again, this is the real world, do your work, talk less, use common sense and you'll get what you deserve.

      In general, don't blame the global economy that makes America a great place to live, just because you can't take advantage of it.

    22. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But on the other hand, employees who say "we have plenty of engineers" is just saying "I want to be paid more".

      When the US engineering unemployment rate is 5%, we have plenty of engineers. Before the last decade, rates were typically around 2% or less. Importing labor when there is already a glut only puts more people out of work.

    23. Re:This is news? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      H1-Bs need a SPONSOR, nothing more. Experience is nice but not required. I have had several agencies I worked for that wanted me to add unexperienced H1-B Java programmers at 30-35K/yr to my project so they could make more from the rate they charged the customer. If they could add a H1B at $25/hr versus a US Employee at $40/hr and still charge the customer $80 they darn sure were going to do that. I kept rejecting the applicants as there was a requirement by the customer for them to be US Citizens

    24. Re:This is news? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen this at my company, either. Instead, they've either hired people through contracting agencies (and the agencies ripped the employee off) or as of recently, they just stopped hiring in this country all together and are limited all expansion to occur on foreign soil, entirely.

      When you move your corporations campuses and employees to other countries, you can avoid all those pesky limitations and debates - and all your other expenses drop, too. Hurrah!

    25. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Moreover, INS (now USCIS) has a prevalent wage requirement for H-1B workers. I believe that wage is about $75K for software engineers currently. Thus, any employer offering a salary below this rate to a software engineers should/would be denied the H-1B visa.

      There is a big difference between should and would. First, there is no active enforcement of H-1B program regulations. That has never been funded by Clinton or Bush, so the DOL simply doesn't do it - they don't have the people. The only way to get enforcement of the regulations is via lawsuit against a company. Second, any company hiring H-1Bs is allowed to use its own method to determine prevailing wage if they want, and the last time I checked, nearly 70% did so. They are also allowed to set the worker's title of course, so it's easy to hire an experienced programmer as an associate. The government's own study (as well as independent ones) have shown H-1Bs are paid 15% to 30% less than resident workers for the same job. (And I gave links to all this stuff the last time this subject came up, so it's pointless to do it again - it doesn't do any good.) Just because your company doesn't abuse the program doesn't mean that other companies are as ethical.

    26. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      China employs dead white guys?

    27. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the Taj Mahal! And the Pyramids! And the Great Wall of China! And (whisper) OH? What! Nevermind!

    28. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Now to me this means H-1b hires are generally more entry-level than the average worker (duh!). That's not saying that there probably isn't a fair bit of fraud and misrepresentation of the level of a position, especially since the employer sets the level themselves and then documents the requirements, but it's not happening on an industry-wide level as the article would have you believe.

      You can't have it both ways. If the positions are entry-level, then the ITAA is lying when they say they can't find skilled workers. It's even more of a lie considering the number of experienced IT workers in the unemployment line. Then the industry claimed they were losing the "best and brightest" who were here on student visas. Congress supplied a new category of H-1B for these post-graduates, and guess what - they haven't been used. It is an industry-wide misrepresentation of the true situation. There is no penalty for lying to Congress if you're not under oath and your campaign contributions have been paid.

    29. Re:This is news? by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Really? Well, how about pointing me to this giant cache of experienced java programmers with network management experience in the Spokane area.

      In some areas there is definitly a lack of any available talent.

      As long as I'm at it, if anyone is really expert at Google Earth (specifically, serving sets of locations from a web server) and willing to travel to spokane, wa for a few months consulting, please respond to my profile.

    30. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      When you realise that tech companies ask for more students to go through american universities and for more people in general to take up programming, it is for the same reason that the US tries to persuade OPEC nations to pump more oil. When seen in this light none of this seems particularly surprising (or evil, for that matter).

      I guess that's true if you consider people's lives and futures to be a commodity. When someone like Bill Gates or Andy Grove convinces US students to take on huge debts to get an education in a field where they know their companies are really unwilling to hire those graduates, I consider that pretty evil. If you don't want US workers, then don't lie to students and waste their education (and money) just to lobby Congress for legislation to help make you richer. I find it hard to believe the depths to which American corporate management has sunk.

    31. Re:This is news? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Well, how about pointing me to this giant cache of experienced java programmers with network management experience in the Spokane area.

      Soem of them live in Seattle and are willing to telecommute. I dunno if that fits your company, but they do exist.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    32. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      and guess what - they haven't been used

      Incorrect, most of them had been used. They made a resonable and generous maximum quota, what is wrong with that? Would you prefer those guys who got an excellent education in U.S., usually for free, as they do get scholarships, to go back overeas to compete against us?

      That's the whole idea - do not fight H1B, fight misuse of H1B for low level folks.

      The problem I do observe is that our immigration laws and the whole system is so terrible in U.S. that some of the true "best and brightest" just do not care to bother - they can find a good job elsewhere. It should be made simpler, not harder for them to get in and stay in and work their asses and brains off.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    33. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, there is a shortage of IT workers who know what they're doing.

    34. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      Not another "insightful" populist...

      We do have "plenty of engineers", but they charge too much. Solution: bid lower to compete with foreign labor. Just like how everyone you buy from bids lower to get your business.

      You do look for bargains, don't you, hypocrite?

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    35. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Incorrect, most of them had been used.

      Excuse me? I didn't say none of them had been used. For such a (claimed) hotly needed category, the 20,000 visas should have been snapped up immediately by the IT industry that was so desperately in need of these folks.

      That's the whole idea - do not fight H1B, fight misuse of H1B for low level folks.

      The entire H-1B program is a scam. There is no shortage of IT labor, which is the claim that the ITAA made to get Congress to pass this boondoggle. It is a perversion of immigration law that allows certain companies to bypass normal immigration channels. In effect, it is an IT bracero program complete with all the negative connotations that implies. You've already admitted you make a living from this program, so you don't really have a good position to make judgements from. (Please forgive the ending preposition.)

    36. Re:This is news? by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      Has anyone looked at why certain people are cheaper? The issue here isn't quality it is government. The US Government so generous with student loans requires you to pay them back with "After Tax dollars". Of course your favorite Indian guy or Chinese guy didn't have to do that. So when he graduated $30,000 a year looks like a kings ransom. For the poor American with his government running this formal trade war called the US Income Tax scam on him, he has to pay back his notes with double the dollars and live too! When that gets done, he has to command two times his debt a year just to eat. That means he needs something like $60 K just to make headway. Both parties live on par.

      Of course the employer given the opportunity of dumping the over taxed American will scream to his congress critter about how those lazy American kids just want too much money. Thats about it.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    37. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      by the IT industry that was so desperately in need of these folks.

      Would not you think that that would be limited by the amount of eligible folks? They "snapped up" everybody who graduated and wanted to stay. They used up about 15000 for this year so far, as far as I know. Looks like somebody coming up with the number actually did his homework for a change.

      There is no shortage of IT labor

      H1B is not about IT only.

      So you are suggesting that their should be NO way to bring a useful talented specialist from another country? What are "normal immigration channels" you are talking about? Name one and tell me how long it will take. L1? Not for companies without international presense. Exceptional abilities or National interest? Not for techies.

      There is no other useful way of bringing talented people in, and if you think we will be better off sending them packing, you do not know what you are talking about. I would not be able to replace H1B folks in my department, for any money, with anybody. And given their pay and headache involved with our lawers - if we could do that, we would.

      I would agree that abuse should be fixed - but taking away easy and legal immigration would only make it worse. Current wave of outsourcing - mandated from our BoD here - shows what will happen. That H1B guy is not taking your job - he is allowing us to create one for you here.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    38. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Not another "insightful" populist...

      If you want to moderate, shut up and do so.

      We do have "plenty of engineers", but they charge too much. Solution: bid lower to compete with foreign labor. Just like how everyone you buy from bids lower to get your business.

      There is no union of engineers that determine the going wage. Companies are free to offer what they will, only they don't. The company stock price goes up when layoffs and outsourcing are announced. Stock analysts and CxOs love it, so it happens. Why should the engineers who built a great big company lose their jobs because the new CEO wants a bigger bonus? Who says the people who made the company make too much? You? How? WTF do you know?

      You do look for bargains, don't you, hypocrite?

      Well, since you've decided to degenerate into calling names, may I call you Moron? OK, thanks. Moron, there's a difference between a bargain and the cheapest price. A bargain is getting good value for your money. A cheap WalMart shirt that falls apart in a few weeks is not a good bargain compared to a more expensive shirt that will last for years. I recently paid 20% more for some major yard work to a company with a good reputation over the lowest bid, and it was done well and on schedule. I got a bargain.

    39. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the grocery store's customers would pay a higher price, the store owner would be charging it already. The grocer responds to a higher labor price in the same way that his customers respond to a higher price of carrots: by buying less.

    40. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      They used up about 15000 for this year so far, as far as I know. Looks like somebody coming up with the number actually did his homework for a change.

      Considering their claims, it looks like they weren't really all that interested after all. They couldn't find 20,000 of these hot talents they were discussing in all the colleges and universities in the US?

      H1B is not about IT only.

      Yes, it also includes fashion models, but the latest figures I've seen indicate that over 90% of H-1B visas go to programmers.

      So you are suggesting that their should be NO way to bring a useful talented specialist from another country? What are "normal immigration channels" you are talking about? Name one and tell me how long it will take. L1?

      Doesn't the L1 visa do exactly that? It allows a company to bring in people with special knowledge and even pay them at the foreign rate - oh, wait, that's a downside compared to the H-1B, isn't it?

      There is no other useful way of bringing talented people in, and if you think we will be better off sending them packing, you do not know what you are talking about.

      How could we "send them packing" unless they were here in the first place? Why do you think that "them" are more talented than the people already here?

      I would not be able to replace H1B folks in my department, for any money, with anybody. And given their pay and headache involved with our lawers

      I think you are being disingenuous. The phrase "for any money, with anybody" proves it. If your H-1Bs are irreplaceable, what happens when they die? Given your position, you know full well that there is minimal legal expense unless your company is sponsoring the H-1Bs for green cards.

      I would agree that abuse should be fixed - but taking away easy and legal immigration would only make it worse.

      The H-1B is suppose to be a non-immigrant visa, but since you make your living on the reality of that immigration loophole, you can't be expected to say anything less.

    41. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your child posts are missing one important point. Most of the H1B laborers in the US don't work for large US corporations, but for Indian 'Consultancy' companies like TCS, Infosys & Wipro. Most of them pay $10-15 an hour.
      Check out http://programmersguild.org/docs/lowest_paying_200 4.htm

    42. Re:This is news? by Descalzo · · Score: 1
      The logical upshot of this line of thinking would be that as the minimum wage has increased, consumption has decreased. Consumption has certainly increased since the inception of the minimum wage, hasn't it? The grocer can't do all the work himself, anyway. He has to have help or stay away from his family even more, or reduce the quality of service. Anyway, has employment decreased since minimum wage has come along?

      Now that I think of it, there have been so many changes since minimum wage, there are too many variables to tell one way or the other, I guess.

      --
      I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
    43. Re:This is news? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between should and would. First, there is no active enforcement of H-1B program regulations.

      Amen! They should take about $500 a year from the visa salaries for enforcement. The H1B program promises a lot on paper, but the paper rarely hits the pavement.

    44. Re:This is news? by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      RE: H1B is not about IT only.

      The models can complain about their loss of work on their OWN forum.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    45. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was on H1B until last year (now I have GC) and I was consistently making more than my American Colleagues(I know this because I was working as a consultant in HR systems).Also, I couldn't believe how pathetic the salaries were for Americans at my clients. In my opinion(certainly true of all my H1B friends), H1Bs especially the ones from India are better paid than Americans because Indians talk among themselves about salries and are very aware of what the market will bear. Americans are usually reluctant to talk about salaries in their social groups and hence are not aware what they are worth. As a result, in any salary negotiaion Americans get screwed and their Indian counterpart negotiate their salary better.

    46. Re:This is news? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised. $74k for a computer programmer, absolutely unbelievable. How many nurses or teachers could you get for that much money?

    47. Re:This is news? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Importing labor when there is already a glut only puts more people out of work.

      Labour? Thought this was IT we are talking about? Labour involves physical work.

      Importing workers doesn't put people out of work. If an American is replaced by a Chinaman, there is no difference to the number of people employed. Of course there is one less American employed, but that's only an issue to racists.

    48. Re:This is news? by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      there is no active enforcement of H-1B program regulations.

      That's not completely true. At least, it wasn't a couple of years ago when my Green Card app went in. The DoL told the company that I wasn't being paid enough, so they gave me a raise. That's not to say that the regulations are properly enforced all over the country, but it worked out OK for me the one time I *know* the system worked.

    49. Re:This is news? by skubeedooo · · Score: 1

      The average salary for a programmer in california is $73000. How can you claim the industry doesn't want them? To me $73,000 sounds like a huge salary, and the UK isn't exactly 3rd world itself.

    50. Re:This is news? by chocsforu · · Score: 1

      Nah ! Who told you it is not implmented. I know at least 3 examples in real life with H1B rejection because the salary requirement was not met. Look enough and research before you take on to mislead people by saying what you just did.

    51. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of these are examples from societies that placed the "good" of an imaginary value over the good of the people. Every thing worth a damn means things like medecine, democracy, freedom, etc...
      You are free to move to Egypt if you think the Pyramids are worth a damn to you. Or to India, where you can wear a diaper while bathing in a filthy river to pay homage to rats. Oh, what's that? Scientific method? Roger Bacon? Dead white guys.
      (The same dead white guys that make it possible to have machines to see pictures of the Taj Mahal instantly from across the world.)

    52. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Also, there is a shortage of IT workers who know what they're doing.

      Alas, there's a veritable abundance of managers who don't care about that, since they are so busy salivating over the IT worker surplus and all the margin that that will buy them. Price is trumping quality quite often. It's gotten so bad around here (Toledo OH) that routinely I'm seeing a complete collapse of due diligence in the planning and execution of IT work ... just to make the sale and have warm bodies show up in the belief that a valid invoice can then be issued. Too often the invoice is made and paid. It boggles the mind, but that's what happens when corporations tell everyone to be a salesman. Executive-level suppliers and consumers are not in actual business anymore -- they are merely playing instead a "Game of Money", and there are no rules, hence cheating is commonplace.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    53. Re:This is news? by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      The 20,000 additional H-1b's reserved for aliens with a Master's from a US institution is a new development, once companies have the timing down and are grabing people as they graduate rather than tracking them down abroad, I am sure they will be used as quickly as normal H-1bs are now.

      L-1 visas are intracompany transfers. You must prove a direct corporate relationship with an international company that has employed the beneficiary for one of the past three years. If you aren't an international company, no L visas for you, period.

      The L-1 and H-1b visas are "dual intent", meaning you may apply for immigrant status while in H or L status without risking your current non-immigrant status. I belive these are the only dual intent visas. I don't have any numbers, and I work on the East Coast, but I find "90% Computer Programmers" figure highly dubious, the firm I work for handles a fair amount of H-1b cases, and they are a grab-bag of occupations, if anything I would say that biomedical researchers, both in acadamia and in commercial research shops, are the biggest group.

    54. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      At the expense of burning all my karma and offending all the Polital Correctness whores, I'll say that would never want to work for a Chinese, Indian or Russian boss. They've been kicked around as graduate students or as H1B workers and then they feel like they need to pay back and want to fuck everyone around them who is not from thier own part of the world.

      Yep, you got modded a Troll. So let's just repeat your "from the trenches" observation and opinion, and I'll toss my Karma into the bonfire with you.

      I seldom see yuppies who want to hear about racial issues in the workplace ... yet I plainly see such issues in too many instances (albeit infrequently). Racial cronyism is as reprehensible as any other form of cronyism. Furthermore, the more H1B and L1 workers that appear in America, the more we invite these islands of cronies to exist.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    55. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      So what would you suggest? The legislature vote me a raise?

      No, but your government levels can well STOP the extensive lubrication of the gears of the offshoring, outsourcing and immigration engines. Your legislature makes the laws, allegedly from the desires of the people. Said legislature is also authorized to lay taxes. Hence, you have every right to lay a departure tax on each dollar of the commonwealth that tries to expatriate. Those tax proceeds can then be used to pay the increased levels of unemployment claims, and as well indulge in this "re-training" that the Republican types claim is the salvation of the American worker. (Note: I don't actually believe this claim. Any skill or profession that a factory or tech worker can re-train into, is still eminently offshorable or outsourceable, or can be done by a cheaper immigrant.)

      The sad truth is that YOUR OWN government is almost 100% supportive of expatriation of YOUR commonwealth -- dollar by dollar, asset by asset, factory by factory, corporation by corporation. Once you control your own government by removing the elite who are the vassals of corporate wealth, then there will be no need to do something as absurd as "voting you a raise".

      Just stop them from "voting to raise your fees" (since your tax money is being extensively used to loot America by the corporate and wealthy minority). That's all I'm effectively saying.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    56. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Of course the employer given the opportunity of dumping the over taxed American will scream to his congress critter about how those lazy American kids just want too much money.

      In other words, American corporations love the American consumer, but they hate the America worker. This trend can't last.

      Having seen this coming since 2000, and thence having understood that I'm the losing side in a CLASS WAR, I decided to stop consuming as much as possible and to save my money for the (and obviously) inevitable long periods of under- and un-employment for the rest of my life. This means that I don't consume the products and services that I end up creating or supporting. Again, this trend can't last ... if the franchise of my behavior expands, which it only can, considering the shrinking set of options for many of the workers around me.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    57. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      Solution: bid lower to compete with foreign labor.

      That would mean much of the American population will move into tentaments for 21st Century living. Expenses can't continue to rise (or even plateau) when income takes THAT MUCH of a dive.

      I don't know about you, but I'm not just going to sit back in my 1 rented room in a tentament filled with desperate poor, just so some millionaire can get 20% on his money each year. Converting America to a tent city is going to lead to civil war.

      And you're supposed to avoid civil war, you little fuck. Deal with ethics much? Watched "Omega Man" a few too many times?

      Globalization will eventually even out values of labor. I expect my wages to drop. But "eventually" isn't good enough for meeting current obligations. What's happening now is an orgy of expatriating the American commonwealth just to mint a few more millionaires. It doesn't serve the common good and is leading to marked instability in societies across the globe as well. War is a bad price to pay for riches.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    58. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      If you want to moderate, shut up and do so.

      Ah, so you're the person who mods down well-reasoned posts he disagrees with instead of replying to them. Sorry, I prefer the latter option...more civilized and all.

      There is no union of engineers that determine the going wage.

      No union ever determines the going wage... not long term anyway. If an engineer's union formed and tried to extort higher-than-market wages, that would accelerate the flight of jobs to other countries.

      Companies are free to offer what they will, only they don't. The company stock price goes up when layoffs and outsourcing are announced. Stock analysts and CxOs love it, so it happens. Why should the engineers who built a great big company lose their jobs because the new CEO wants a bigger bonus?

      Right, stock price always goes up when they outsource and fire overpriced American programmers. So, tell me again why the entire American labor force hasn't been replaced by Indians? If outsourcing always 100% guarantees a jump in stock prices, why hasn't everyone been outsourced? Why not just have uneducated sub-Saharan workes, who work for like five cents an hour, do the coding? Wouldn't that be cheaper? Why hasn't anyone tried that?

      And why don't you make a bet with some CEO that doing so will get him huge profits?

      Who says the people who made the company make too much? You? How? WTF do you know?

      Hey, why stop there? My mom did a lot of work raising me. I think she deserves, right now, a fat check for $1 million. What? You disagree? How? WTF do you know?

      Well, since you've decided to degenerate into calling names, may I call you Moron? OK, thanks. Moron, there's a difference between a bargain and the cheapest price. A bargain is getting good value for your money. A cheap WalMart shirt that falls apart in a few weeks is not a good bargain compared to a more expensive shirt that will last for years. I recently paid 20% more for some major yard work to a company with a good reputation over the lowest bid, and it was done well and on schedule. I got a bargain.

      Really? Really? You mean it's not just the price, but the ratio of value to price? Wow, I never knew that before! I guess that's why I never said this: "Employers seek more value per cost." http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166337&cid=138 75362

      Oops, I did.

      No shit quality is a factor. New concept: those buying cheaper programming labor *don't think the higher quality of American coders justifies the additional price*. That's why the cheaper labor in this case is a bargain. But you're not satisfied with that. You want to make them hire your labor at higher prices despite the additional quality not justifying the additional expense. You look for bargains, but tell others not to. That makes you a hypocrite. It does not make me a moron (though it does suggest another candidate).

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    59. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      That would mean much of the American population will move into tentaments for 21st Century living. Expenses can't continue to rise (or even plateau) when income takes THAT MUCH of a dive.

      No, they wouldn't. Sorry. If every American coder's wage is driven alllllllllllll the way down to $55,000, that's still MUCH higher than, I don't know 99.5% of the world... not tenement housing yet. Further, the policy of letting everyone hire the best value labor means your prices are lower. Would you be better off if I made you turn down gifts? Then why are you better off when you're stopped from buying better values?

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    60. Re:This is news? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. The real "kicker" is that I am a Russian immigrant myself who works as a software developer. And I can't say that I have personally had a bad experience but most immigrants I know did, and I have seen them get up the ladder and then it is pure revenge for all those years of "slaving" for the yuppies. I wouldn't want to go into management, cause to be honest, I don't think I would even like to work for myself if I was a manager. But I do like software develpment, just gotta find a nice reasonable and appreciative boss to work for.

    61. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      Doesn't the L1 visa do exactly that?

      It does not. You just proved you do not know what you are talking about.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    62. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      Why do you think that "them" are more talented than the people already here?

      Because not all talented people where born in U.S.

      Since you are obviously flat out against professional immigration, I guess there is nothing to talk about indeed. But in your patriotic zeal - look back on who actually made this country great. U.S. will quickly lose its technological leadership if talented foreigners can not work here, and that's a fact.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    63. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      I hear of coder wages being driven ALREADY to $15/hr ($30K). Hence, you're wrong.

      Techie wages are being driven to $8/hr. Try AVOIDING living in a tentament on that, chum.

      It's all about driving the middle class down into the working poor. If you don't see it around you, then you're just not looking. But here in the Midwest it is a tsunami of social change.

      You may have caught the news about Delphi intending to cut its worker wages by about 60%. That's going to happen to about 400 employees in a nearby town. IT'S HAPPENING, CHUM.

      So we're left with you lookin' all stupid an' shit, standing in a field with a "willful ignorance" sign hung on your back.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    64. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      Let's try to tone it down.

      Even conceding that you're right about the status of wages, I really don't see how it implies people living in tenement housing (and I don't particularly care for terminology that implies non-poor people don't work). I've lived on much less than 30K BEFORE taxes and I wasn't in tenement housing and I could actually save up a lot. And just to clarify, that doesn't mean these programmers are "loaded", just that they're not going to be dirt poor like you seem to think, even taking your stats at face value.

      And I don't even know where you are getting these numbers. I posted a programming contract job for a project on rentacoder.com. I expect that the labor would take at least 10 hours, and I didn't a single bid from an American - and none as low as $150. If that's what these programmers are working for, it's really odd why they aren't bidding on my project. Can you refer me to one of these people? I'm serious. It would be great to have an American programmer.

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    65. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      L-1 visas are intracompany transfers. You must prove a direct corporate relationship with an international company that has employed the beneficiary for one of the past three years. If you aren't an international company, no L visas for you, period.

      Duh, how many large employers are not "international"? The L1 is about specialized knowledge; the H-1B is about importing programmers.

      I don't have any numbers, and I work on the East Coast, but I find "90% Computer Programmers" figure highly dubious, the firm I work for handles a fair amount of H-1b cases, and they are a grab-bag of occupations, if anything I would say that biomedical researchers, both in acadamia and in commercial research shops, are the biggest group.

      You seem amazingly uniformed on the subject considering your occupation. I suggest you google on "matloff law journal" to get the summary. Get the white paper which I've linked to in another comment in this discussion for the full report.

    66. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      It does not. You just proved you do not know what you are talking about.

      The L1 visa expressly provides for people with specialized knowledge. That is why companies are allowed to bring them in with few restrictions. If you doubt that, you have no idea what you're talking about (which is obvious).

    67. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Because not all talented people where[sic] born in U.S.

      I didn't say they were. I don't think American programmers are more talented than those in other countries. I also don't believe that foreign programmers are more talented than American programmers. I believe we're all relatively equal when it comes to talents, intelligence, and good looks (or the relative lack thereof of all the previous). Why do you believe otherwise?

      Since you are obviously flat out against professional immigration, I guess there is nothing to talk about indeed.

      Damn, you're clueless. I'm not opposed to professional immigration, I'm opposed to the underhanded deception used by the beneficiaries of the H-1B program. We have a normal immigration policy which is being subverted by the H-1B program for the benefit of large corportions and the detriment of American workers.

      But in your patriotic zeal - look back on who actually made this country great.

      Don't confuse nationalism with patriotism. The people who made this country great were Americans. Most of them came here from other countries, but they followed normal immigration policy and became Americans, like my forebears.

      U.S. will quickly lose its technological leadership if talented foreigners can not work here, and that's a fact.

      Really? Can you provide a link to that fact? And here I thought we were in a global economy, and it no longer mattered where you lived. Besides there is nothing to stop "talented foreigners" from coming in through normal channels or on an L1 visa when needed. I've worked with and/or supervised a number of H-1Bs, and there is only one Russian that I'd call "talented" - the rest were/are mediocre at best, just like most American programmers.

    68. Re:This is news? by ThreeE · · Score: 0
      Amazingly workers completely outnumber employers in this country but workers are consistently suckered by issues like abortion,...

      But you have to agree that abortion is a valid issue to be "suckered" by. It certainly deserves more debate than work visa crap -- no matter your position. I happen to think it is murder -- and therefore it deserves a hell of a lot of debate. But even if you are pro-choice, you probably think it is "worthy."

      I'll leave the gay bashing issue alone for now...

    69. Re:This is news? by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      "The L-1 and H-1b visas are "dual intent", meaning you may apply for immigrant status while in H or L status without risking your current non-immigrant status."

      Aha !.....So you've just stated the PRECISE loophole that's been worded into the legislation since the mid-late 80's into the these statuses. These statii, at least the H1B, wasn't intended for the long term employment of "immigrational" employees, it was meant to TEMPORARILY SUPPLANT, the needs of a company who's industry found a difficulty in finding ALREADY CITIZENED skilled labor. That is SIMPLY NOT the case today, it just isn't. The numbers ( and I've yet to see someone point to DEFINITIVE studies, hell even ONE study, that says that there's a TRUE shortage of skilled IT people. ) There may be a lack of willingness of people to work for the technical equivalent of migrant farm worker salaries, but with all due respect to those migrants who pick our crops, THEY didn't go to college for a significant percentage of their lifetime ( at the time most college students GO to college ) to study their technical field. So, since we're NOT talking about the technical equivalent of a migrant worker, how come the salaries that are offered to many H1B's ARE valued like that. I'll bet if it you put a Citizened IT worker ( yes, PRESUMING qualifications match ) next to an H1B ( or L1 or F1 ) candidate, and offered the the Citizened IT worker the salary they're offereing the H1B/L1, OF COURSE they're going to tell you to fly a kite ( barring that they've been so grossly beaten down by unemployment that the mortgage company is knocking on their door ).

      The simple reality of it is, that most Management today is UNWILLING to accept that they're cutting off their PETER to pay Paul. Here I am in Miami, after having gone through a hurricane, and sitting in a line at a home depot waiting to buy some batteries and flashlights ( maybe a tank of propane ), and who should be in front of me in line ? A guy who's studying to get his MIS degree. Already this drone has been reprogrammed to think that "Oh, there's nothing wrong with using H1B's, they're cheaper". You know the funny thing is....in a previous post, I mentioned interviewing several people for a position at my previous employer's, HALF of the people I interviewed were F1 -> H1B desirous, and NONE of them were up to the job ( and these were grad students ). So much for "cheaper is better". Luckily for him, I got called in to the home depot ( they're escorting people in to the stores due to loss of power ), or I would have told him how I turned away all those folks that he would take on willingly. Maybe I should've asked him what projects he was working on, so I steer clear of making use of their software, or better yet, submit a counter offer for implementation to FIX the bloody mess left behind by these "cheaper is better" programmers ( When someone can show me the programmers being churned out of colleges today actually adhere to standards and practices that are SANE, then I'll call them Engineers, but not before. )

      Sorry for the rant, but putzes like this, and his buddy Axe ( Don't worry, I'll get to you in a minute or two, as soon as /. lets me post again ), that have NOT A SINGLE clue as the reality of life in the U.S job market, that tells me that it's going to take a brain overhaul of the whole industry for some sanity to resume, and for the U.S. to maintain it's technical lead over the rest of the world. Otherwise, I see hard times ahead for all of us.

      In other news, over 85% of Miami remains without Electricity......keep the rest who don't have power in your thoughts. Time for me to help out, now that I'm in the 15% that does have power.

    70. Re:This is news? by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      You're not seeing it solely because you refuse to believe it.

      We're not going to be living in space cities in the 21st Century. The primary dwelling for the 21st Century will be a tentament.

      Many people are devolving already into pre-tentaments, called "apartments". Some condos in cities also fulfill this pre-tentament condition.

      So as wages fall, and the price and cost of real housing rise, it ONLY STANDS TO REASON that the end product will bottom out at Roman-esque tentaments.

      Many people in Europe live in tentament housing. Fortunately for the Europeans, they have socialized systems and overall a strong sense of culture and community, so their tentaments aren't bad at all. But America is being converted into a corporation-support system ONLY -- with little to no regard for INDIVIDUAL survival, prosperity and even rights -- and that means legions of desperate poor, hence particularly nasty tentament housing.

      The news media of course completely spins this future by endless concentration upon the yuppie classes and all the obnoxiously expensive shit they buy on almost 100% credit. But having highly overextended yuppies in McMansions is a very unstable position (and limited besides), hence the future becomes clear after that point.

      Once the housing bubble bursts in a big way (which may take up to 20 years), America will have vast policing powers to force people to not make use of (i.e. squat on) all the abandoned housing, hence forcing people into the harsh hands of a new class of slumlord -- a hyperslumlord. These hypers will have vast, condensed properties hollowed out and fitted for as high a density of living as possible, since their only concern will be to get as much of each person's income as possible. These will become the actual tentaments. Legions of prior middle class will arrive at them with destroyed credit, few employment prospects, and very little savings.

      But other instances of tentaments will arise. Many McMansions will be refurb'd into duplexes. Cutting a "normal" 1920s-1930s house into apartments had long ago been done, but in all their generational avoidance of honesty, Americans never wanted to call that a "tentament" trend.

      At any rate, I'm right, and I'm preparing for that future. America's glorious 21st Century is arriving and it is not just tarnished, but it is steadily corroding before our eyes. To even survive as the middle class, I have to save money NOW, while I'm surrounded by people who are living on 103% of their incomes. My accumulated wealth is just about the only chance I have to avoid being shoehorned (essentially by force, and I mostly mean ECONOMIC force) into a tentament by the time Social Security crashes in the 2020s, and by the time my very threatened retirement looms in 2036.

      P.S. Your personal refusals and problems don't concern me. If you don't see the numbers I've seen, it only means that you're not as well read as I am. The more you refuse to investigate your society's future vectors, the more you'll be stung by them. {shrug}

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
    71. Re:This is news? by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

      Sorry, it doesn't work that way. If your statistics fail even the most rudimentary "reality check", they're way off. That I could not find bidders offering the prices your statistics would suggest shows they're off. I should have been getting low bids from Americans. I got no bids from Americans. Refusing my offer just shows you're blowing smoke.

      Regarding the rest, I don't know what to say. It looks like a version of "Somehow, Cuba is in dire poverty despite its noble communist government." Maybe Europeans are poor because of over-regulated labor markets? Makes sense. When you buy labor - like when you shop at the supermarket, if someone told you that once you bought from the supermarket, you had to buy there until you could convince a judge that you had a "legitimate economic need" to shop somewhere else, you'd be pretty wary about buying anyone's labor, i.e., shopping at any supermarket. That doesn't make for a healthy economic environment.

      Your comment about Social Security is particularly perplexing. Sure, it's going to collapse. If you had been able to invest your own money in your own account, you would be loaded in 2020. Unfortunately, the political party closest to your views tends to 1) support this theft of your investment funds and 2) denies that there is a problem at all.

      I'll go back to looking for these imaginary $15/hour American coders. You can go back to not believing everything you hear.

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    72. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      You are a certified, and quite uneducated xenophobe. End of story.

      Yes there are plenty of links to these facts if you bother to keep yourself up to date and educated: you have proven to be unaware of some basic issues at question.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    73. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      The L1 visa expressly provides for people with specialized knowledge.

      It does not. You just proved again you do not know what you are talking about. L1 is intra company transfer: you would need to have an office overseas and employ that person there for at least a year.

      And, or, BTW, L1 is abused even worse then H1B - if you look at top H1B users (http://www.h1b.info/lca_reports_top_100_by_worker .php) abusers are the consulting companies, they switch to L1 easily, while those companies that actually make good use of H1B program, would not be able to do that.

      Uneducated xenophobe.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    74. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      That is true. http://www.h1b.info/lca_reports_top_100_by_worker. php

      I think the best way to fix H1B here is to prohibit H1B holders to work as consultants. For real companies (like the one I work for) H1B should be made easier to obtain (and quota may be lowered, once Indian sweatshops are forced out) to bring in real top talent. They should also set up some reasonable cutoff salary, say $100K/year.

      What I am afraid of, is that when battling abusing they will fold to xenophobic tendencies and just encourage outsourcing instead of promoting competitiveness.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    75. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      The L1 visa expressly provides for people with specialized knowledge.
      It does not. You just proved again you do not know what you are talking about.

      Is google too tough for you? The first two hits: one:

      It can be issued only to an L1-A(Executive, Manager) or to a person with L1-B(specialized knowledge worker).
      two:
      Employment in the U.S. company must be as a manager, executive or person with specialized knowledge and skills
      If you read that several times, you might spot the common phrase.

      L1 is intra company transfer: you would need to have an office overseas and employ that person there for at least a year.

      So what? That has nothing to do with what I said. All large companies are international these days, and we should expect those best and brightest to be employed and experienced.

      And, or, BTW, L1 is abused even worse then H1B

      Again, so what? Both programs are abused, and both should be done away with. There is, however, slightly more justification for the reasoning behind the L1 visa.

      Uneducated xenophobe.

      I'm obviously better educated than you on the subject and better mannered as well. And now you're confusing nationalism with xenophobia - you probably shouldn't be throwing stones from inside that glass house (or is it an ivory tower?).

    76. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      See previous response. Now, you're just wasting my time by name calling when you're unable to continue the debate or provide any support for your claims. I've been following the H-1B visa since it was instituted. There is even a mailing list devoted to news about it, and I subscribe to it - you obviously don't, so you might want to avoid commenting when the subject comes up in the future.

    77. Re:This is news? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Can someone explain what OGGE a tentament is? Is it a made-up word (along the lines of "brunch" and "spork") meaning an apartment block made of a frame with canvas stretched o'er it?.

      Or maybe it's something to do with half of the Bible.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    78. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      Jesus, what an idiot.

      Google too tough for you? Can you look up the part about requirement that an L1 visa holder is actually employed in your overseas office for a year?

      You are not just an uneducated moron - an arrogant uneducated moron.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    79. Re:This is news? by Axe · · Score: 1
      The United States L1 visa is a non-immigrant visa which allows companies operating both in the US and abroad to transfer certain classes of employee from its foreign operations to the USA operations for up to seven years. The employee must have worked for a subsidiary, parent, affiliate or branch office of your US company outside of the US for at least one year out of the last three years.

      News flash: not every company has a subsidiary, parent, affiliate or branch office outside of U.S.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    80. Re:This is news? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Heh, I see you got some mod points. Just because you lost an argument - what a baby.

  3. OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's beneath it is probably some hideous unethical, if not illegal, practice of hiring only H-1B people into jobs.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh, so I'm supposed to pay more for all of my software so you can have higher wages right? The government should force the IT business to have a minimum wage of $45 per hour because that'd be ethical right? I think Marx and co. tried that in Europe last century and it didn't go over so well. If you can't compete get the hell out of the IT kitchen, I'm not going to pay for your lack of skill.

    2. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Ohhh, so I'm supposed to pay more for all of my software so you can have higher wages right?

      H-1B, correct me if I'm wrong, does not dictate your choice of software vendors. If one is too expensive for your tastes, you still have the option to go elsewhere.

      The government should force the IT business to have a minimum wage of $45 per hour because that'd be ethical right?

      Nope, can't agree with you there. I don't think the minimum wage should go up that much, we'd have wholesale inflation.

      I think Marx and co. tried that in Europe last century and it didn't go over so well.

      So you think it's worth another try?

      If you can't compete get the hell out of the IT kitchen, I'm not going to pay for your lack of skill. I look forward to having this discussion again after you complete 2nd grade.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's beneath it is probably some hideous unethical, if not illegal, practice of hiring only H-1B people into jobs.

      Welcome to the IT industry.

    4. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Nahor · · Score: 1
      What's beneath it is probably some hideous unethical, if not illegal, practice of hiring only H-1B people into jobs.

      I fail to see what is unethical about it. I find it unethical to force companies to hire expensive and bad american IT people instead of cheap and good foreign ones.

      I would agree with you if the H1-B hire were underpaid (like the outsourcing of some clothes/shoes factories) but AFAIK that's not the case.
    5. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sarcasm ( P ) Pronunciation Key (särkzm)
      n.
      1. A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
      2. A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
      3. The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit[1].

      [Late Latin sarcasmus, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein, to bite the lips in rage, from sarx, sark-, flesh.]

    6. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Welcome to the IT industry.

      Why is the IT industry unique in this respect?

      Seems the garment industry had this worked out a long time ago. A few years ago you could still find sweatshops in the United States with imigrant workers chained to their work tables. Wasn't that Kathy Lee's undoing?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I would agree with you if the H1-B hire were underpaid (like the outsourcing of some clothes/shoes factories) but AFAIK that's not the case.

      You're a newcomer, I take it.

      Back in the late 90's California IT companies, Sun, HP, Intel, Cisco and on and on, lobbied for a large increase in H-1B visas, based upon the lack of job candidate US citizens. Not many complained because it was true and wages were going through the roof to keep people from jumping ship, or luring them to jump another ship to another employer. Then the bubble burst and nobody has done anything about repealing the limit. Now wages plummet because employers can establish below-cost-of-living jobs and H-1B visa holders will snap them up, as many are only in the US for the short haul and could care less about Social Security, schools, infrastructure, etc.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Nahor · · Score: 1
      Now wages plummet because employers can establish below-cost-of-living jobs and H-1B visa holders will snap them up, as many are only in the US for the short haul and could care less about Social Security, schools, infrastructure, etc.

      What reference of cost-of-living, yours? Because if they don't need it Social Security, schools, etc, it's not below theirs. And then I doubt yours is higher than the mexican guy next door and it 6 children working at McDonalds paid a $8/h.

      Unless you can't find a job paid well enough that you can buy food and shelter (and I don't mean caviar and 6 bedrooms house in the hills with a Mercedes), you're just complaining you can't be as rich as before.

      And I know what I'm talking about. After I left school, I was hired at $50,000 to work at Menlo Park, right in the middle of the Silicon Valley. I could still live.

      What's more, it's not so much that IT people are now underpaid rather than the cost-of-living being too high, which is actually due to overpaid people.
    9. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Even if the minimum wage were to remain the same - the present economic situation will soon have us in hyperinflation mode by around 2007 or thereabouts.

    10. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      What reference of cost-of-living, yours?

      Feds. The poverty line in Silicon Valley is ~65,000 annual household income. Before you choke and spit your Jolt all over your keyboard, you might check the cost of housing in the area. Teachers, Police, civil workers and many who work the jobs that keep the cities humming find they can't even afford to live in them. That wasn't too traumatic, some would live several miles away in agricultural communities (thus driving up costs for the people who already lived in those), but the doubling of the price of a gallon of gas has put the hurt on many. You can't look only at the $200-300/mo. these people pay for gas to get to work, but the gross earnings they must make for which $200-300/mo. is net income.

      Because if they don't need it Social Security, schools, etc, it's not below theirs. And then I doubt yours is higher than the mexican guy next door and it 6 children working at McDonalds paid a $8/h.

      Many of these mexican guys who were born south of the border live more efficiently than the typical american. Nuclear families, home cooking and self-made entertainment in the manner of music in the park and socializing with their neighbors rather than watching TV. Quite a few send money back to families in the home country and several return there after saving up a fair chunk of money. They're not really so much different from H-1B people who come in from Asia.

      Unless you can't find a job paid well enough that you can buy food and shelter (and I don't mean caviar and 6 bedrooms house in the hills with a Mercedes), you're just complaining you can't be as rich as before.

      I'm complaining because I can scarcely make ends meet. I've certainly changed my living habits and do a lot more cooking at home. Amazing how far $10 goes when you use it to buy 20 pounds of rice. I rarely see movies now. I rarely travel and usually only when it's very, very cheap. I don't buy much clothing. In short, I make do. I don't have very much breathing room between paycheck and expenses. Then I broke my collar bone and it put me in a world of hardship. Don't preach to me about being rich.

      And I know what I'm talking about. After I left school, I was hired at $50,000 to work at Menlo Park, right in the middle of the Silicon Valley. I could still live.

      Where are you living? At home or sharing rent with housemates? I know what rent is like in that area. You'll never be able to buy a house on $50K/yr in the bay area.

      What's more, it's not so much that IT people are now underpaid rather than the cost-of-living being too high, which is actually due to overpaid people.

      Nothing to do with overpaid people. Get that idea out of your head. Have you looked at the Bay Area? It's packed. There's not much left to build and yet more people keep coming into the area, driving primarily the cost of housing up. In 1997 I could have picked up a tidy little house for $300,000. I can't even get a shack for $600,000 now. All these retirees moving into the area and clubbing each over every scrap of land.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by techdhasu · · Score: 1

      FYI .. the H1 B workers pay social security and medicare taxes inspite of the fact that they may never enjoy the benefits eventually. Had it not been for the huge influx of taxes from such "short haul" workers ...the social security system would be in a deeper mess than it is right now. Frankly speaking, my "local talent" (read american) co-workers are always complaining, demand lot of attention, moody, unwilling to learn new skills and are really not that much more efficient than the H1-B engineer who is either an eager graduate student willing to do the hard work .. or a seasoned veteran who will eventually head back home. It just makes more business sense to get such folk in the long run.

    12. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Axe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Then the bubble burst and nobody has done anything about repealing the limit.

      Bull. It went back from 200000 per year to 65000 (plus 20K for those with U.S. degrees).

      as many are only in the US for the short haul and could care less about Social Security, schools, infrastructure, etc.

      Bull. They pay Social Security, Medicare and all other taxes, while they are not eligible for the benefits.

      Illegal aliens and outsourcing are our enemy. Quality educated folks coming here to work their asses off are our friends.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    13. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Nahor · · Score: 1
      Many of these mexican guys who were born south of the border live more efficiently than the typical american.

      Maybe, but that doesn't detract my point. It just prove that you are living at a higher cost that you really need to. And so the problem is you, not H1-B guy who is cheaper than you.

      Where are you living? At home or sharing rent with housemates? I know what rent is like in that area. You'll never be able to buy a house on $50K/yr in the bay area.

      Sharing an appartment at $800/month. But I have some coworkers renting alone for the same price in the Berkeley area.
      As for the house, no, I couldn't buy one with the salary I had but it's not a necessity in life either.

      Nothing to do with overpaid people. Get that idea out of your head. Have you looked at the Bay Area? It's packed. There's not much left to build and yet more people keep coming into the area, driving primarily the cost of housing up.

      If there was a real demand for cheap housing, you would see more complexes and less one-story house. But until recently, people could still pay higher rents so there was no driving force to make those complex. Quite the contrary
    14. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Seems the garment industry had this worked out a long time ago. A few years ago you could still find sweatshops in the United States with imigrant workers chained to their work tables. Wasn't that Kathy Lee's undoing?

      I believe Kathy Lee was caught hawking sweatshop clothing and quickly got religion. The real point is that the garment workers unionized. Companies claimed they were too expensive and moved the industry overseas, where pesky things like unions weren't a problem. Organizing IT workers however is (with all due respect to your nick) like herding cats, and it hasn't happened. Companies still claim we're too expensive (although they set the wages) and are importing labor and moving the industry overseas. There's a disconnect somewhere.

    15. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I fail to see what is unethical about it. I find it unethical to force companies to hire expensive and bad american IT people instead of cheap and good foreign ones.

      Heh. Yes, it's hard to spot your agenda. American IT workers bad. Foreign IT workers good. I thought most of us were beyond that kind of stuff.

      I would agree with you if the H1-B hire were underpaid (like the outsourcing of some clothes/shoes factories) but AFAIK that's not the case.

      PDF alert, if you're really interested in learning something about the subject (my guess is you're not).

    16. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by RobinH · · Score: 1

      Now wages plummet because employers can establish below-cost-of-living jobs and H-1B visa holders will snap them up, as many are only in the US for the short haul and could care less about Social Security, schools, infrastructure, etc.

      I'm a "foreigner" working at the US company. I don't live in the US, I live in Canada and just commute every day. I use comparatively few US services, but, like an H1B holder, I pay social security, medicare, and more taxes to the US federal and state governments than the average US person paid my salary because I have no deductions (like a mortgage) in the US.

      I am also not cheap - I'm one of the most experienced engineers in the office and I'm paid accordingly. In fact, I was hired in just out of university at a very good salary by US standards.

      The reason for me to apply in the US in the first place was that $1 US was worth about $1.50 or $1.60 Canadian when I started, now it's about $1.15. So now I just stay because I actually like the job (and the raises almost made up for the drop in the dollar).

      So from my point of view, you're talking out of your ass.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    17. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by EireannX · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you if the H1-B hire were underpaid (like the outsourcing of some clothes/shoes factories) but AFAIK that's not the case.

      You really are trying to limit your Knowledge then aren't you? The article that started this thread is a survey of exactly that and an approximation of how much less H1-B workers are getting.

      But now that you know that the H1-Bs are underpaid, your position on the ethics of the situation has changed?

      I could go to the UK, where the exchange rate hovers around double the Australian dollar, and slum it for 2-3 years and earn enough to have a good housing deposit over here. Does that mean the UK engineers are overpaid because houses and the cost of living are more expensive there?

      A foreign engineer probably does not have the same level of university debt that a fully trained American engineer has, and if they 'slum it' living on minimal outlay for 3-5 years in America thay can be set up for life back home due to exchange rates and the much lower costs of living. An American doesn't get that exchange rate or cost of living bonus when they go home. They need to earn enough money to create a future at American rates.

    18. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Please elaborate. I'm not really seeing why this would be so.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    19. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Nahor · · Score: 1
      You really are trying to limit your Knowledge then aren't you? The article that started this thread is a survey of exactly that and an approximation of how much less H1-B workers are getting.

      Enlighten me then: where did you see that H1-Bs were underpaid? Paid less yes but that doesn't mean underpaid.

      I could go to the UK, where the exchange rate hovers around double the Australian dollar, and slum it for 2-3 years and earn enough to have a good housing deposit over here.

      Please do if you want. It's your choice. And then take responsability for it. If you don't go to UK but your neighbor does, don't complain when 10 years later he has a bigger house than yours.

      To me, that's what this whole H1-B thing is about: americans complaining that other countries provide better and/or cheaper labor and whining that it's unfair. Well, tough, but Life is unfair.
    20. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by ray9x · · Score: 1

      "Unethical"?
      At the risk of sounding like my physics teacher, this depends on your frame of reference. My father came to this country about 30 years ago on an H1B, and like (most) anyone else whose experience level rises, he makes a nice amount of money every year. He remembers his struggles, working in various odd jobs (This is *way* before the IT boom) and makes an effort to hire H1B workers to put them on the fast track to citizenship and a comfortable wage.
      "Unethical"? I think not.
      -r.

      --
      .-.
    21. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      And when Americans spend less because they earn less in your fantasy world, tough luck when your business goes under or your employer lays you off and hands their CEO a golden parachute while whining about lost sales. Life is unfair, after all.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    22. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      "If you can't compete get the hell out of the IT kitchen, I'm not going to pay for your lack of skill."

      Lets not ignore that people come from other countries where their education is heavily subsidized by the government to take jobs from US citizens who have to pay their own way.

      Sometimes their even paid to go to school *here*. I sat next to a very nice Indian gentleman back in 1988 when I was taking classes at Hartnell Community College in Salinas, CA. He was taking classes, and paying exorbitant non-resident tuition rates, presumably to do the two years and transfer to a real university. All this on his government's dime. I, of course, was working 30-35 hours a week to pay tuition, bills, rent, etc.

      It should be said though, I work around a lot of H1-B workers, many from India of course but also many from Eastern Europe, and plenty of them are great workers. (Not all, of course, but not all US workers are either.) I have less of a problem with hiring foreign workers than I do with them not being paid a fair wage.

    23. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Nobody had to do anything to repeal the limit after the bubble burst, because the repeal was builtin when the limits were raised.

    24. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by blancolioni · · Score: 1

      could care less about Social Security, schools, infrastructure, etc.

      In my 2.5 years as an H1B in the US, I paid over $45,000 into social security, the benefits of which I will never see. Can I have it back now?

    25. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      The US currency has fallen some 30% to 40% with respect to the other world currencies. The government continues to print money as the deficit grows. The government/corporations continue to offshore jobs in ever-growing numbers as the actual employment outlook worsens and wages continue to drop. The rest is economics history. The most important history specialty - review the events leading up to WWII and the Weimar Republic.

    26. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      Not when they feed into the asenine notion that they can be offered 20-30% lower salaries for performing the same position as a US citizen. It may happen in RARE cases that they are offered similar, but those cases are in the single digits percentile. In EVERY contracting position I've been in over the last 15 years, there have ALWAYS been those folks who got whacked because they'd bring in H1B's to replace them. Straight off, I've even seen cases of people being laid off, only to have their position supplanted by an H1B. And don't tell me bullhockey excuses about "Oh maybe the person had bad habits, or maybe he was hard to get along with, etc..etc.". Wrong. One person in particular was simply an engineer with more years of experience.

      You may be well spoken, but a fallacious argument is always full of holes, no matter how pretty the packaging.......sell it somewhere else, buddy.

    27. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by Axe · · Score: 1
      You sound like a sore loser.

      Xenophobia and protectionism will get us nowhere. The harder it is to bring a talented engineer here - the easier is to make a decision to outsource the whole project outright.

      H1B and L1 abuse from large consulting firms here are not a reason to stop professional immigration. Do not allow them to hire H1B out to clients, and set a reasonble minimum salary for H1B in six figure range.

      We interview people constantly - and I do not see droves of talented developers coming in - for very, very competitive compensations. Our H1Bs are among the highest paid in the group. For IT drones - maybe, but I could not care less for them.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    28. Re:OK, that's obvious on the surface... by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      I haven't lost a job to an H1B...as a matter of fact.....

      When I left the company, they hired 3 folks ( gee, I wonder what classifications they tried to use for that one ), of which 2 have left, and one as I understand it, is looking elsewhere at this very moment.

      I, on the other hand, have returned to contracting, sure the pay increase sucks, and the getting phone calls from the previous employer to come back and enhance the product because they're short handed, is a drag.

      But the sad fact of it all is quite simple. Whatever smoke you're trying to shove up the tailpipe of anyone reading your response to me, will be met by one of two types of readers:

      1. A person who doesn't know better...and it is to THAT PERSON that I've posted my comments, and to which should take notice that your comments about me being "protectionist" are a SMOKE SCREEN. Don't be fooled. Recruiters would LOVE for you to think that H1B's are making "prevailing wage", but the sad fact of it is that they're not. Period. If they are, let companies publish a report that can be independently accounted for, that details the pay BY INDIVIDUAL, BY POSITION. Let's put them together with other numbers of other corporations with published figures given the same. We'll see what the numbers show. OF COURSE, no company in their right mind is going to belly up to the bar. Why ? Because they all know that people aren't stupid.

      2. The person with more than a few brain cells working, that are going to see how companies are handling things like this, for the farce that it is.

      No one's saying the that H1B folks are to blame, many of them are getting a raw-a$$ deal. You know it, I know it. The problem is, you don't have the conviction or fortitude of intestine to admit it freely, and call it out for accountability.

  4. This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is anyone suprised by this?
    My employeer scours the fourth world for masters degrees, sponsors thier visa, then pays them $10/hour and forces them into unpaid overtime. After all, if they complain, the company can just stop sponsoring thier work visa ..

    Unethical? Yes.
    Illigal? Not in this state.

    -Annonymousguywhodoesntwanttogetfired

    1. Re:This is common by The+Infidel · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Since when is this news? /signed

    2. Re:This is common by bear_phillips · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless they are a salaryed employee, unpaid overtime is illegal.

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    3. Re:This is common by lordDallan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell that to WalMart. Always exploited workers, always.

    4. Re:This is common by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Always remember, it's only illegal if you don't have the money to buy a politician.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    5. Re:This is common by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 5, Funny

      'employeer'?
      'thier'?
      'illigal'?

      And you wonder why companies hire foreign workers?

    6. Re:This is common by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Unethical? Yes.

      Why is it unethical? Because you don't like it? Do you think these foreign workers sould be entitled to some sort of guaranteed wage minimum, comparable to those holding similar skills that are native to the country? Should we have a central committee determining what everyone's value is? Screw that free market concept?

      It's already been screwed in many industries by union-forced excessive wages - look at those industries on their ass today because they can't lower their expenses enough to compete with the availability of cheaper, yet sufficiently skilled labor.

      Everybody wants cheaper prices - until it's their rice bowl being looked at. Anything that can be done cheaper should be done cheaper - to do otherwise eventually leads to unsupportable economies - look at the (approaching negative) "growth" rate of many of the EU members.

    7. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm having problems thinking of which cliche to respond with:
      O RLY?
      or maybe a picture of Ric Romero with a caption "H1B workers receive less compesantion, I'm Ric Romero for ABC news"
      It's all about greed, both on part of the employers and the employees. I'm an H1B i came to this country looking for better opportunities ($$$). I didn't know enough, if i did, i would have thought about it twice. By the time you figure out how deep in the shit you are you have 2 choices: return to your country and start over yet again, or try to normalize your situation throught a greencard, save your money, and pray the wait while being a slave is not that long.
      If knownledge of cause is what makes a guilty party more guilty, i would bash the employers more, not the people that come to work, as they fully know they will have mostly absolute advantage.

    8. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is the God damned truth.

      Foreign workers get your jobs because you are inept at something. You could be a fantastic engineer, but if you lack a job it's likely you're horribly inept at social interaction. It's easy to get a job and to hold a job unless you're some mouth-breathing idiot.

    9. Re:This is common by bear_phillips · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    10. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      suprised ... thier ... Illigal

      Perhaps one reason your company favors oursourcing is because the average H1B's grasp of English is no better than yours, thus reducing one variable in the equation.

    11. Re:This is common by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Anything that can be done cheaper should be done cheaper...

      Anything? Well then, let's bring back slavery.
      Then workers don't need to be paid at all.

    12. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's unethical because without the threat of deportation the employer would not be able to get away with that kind of pay scale.

      unless you want to argue that slavery was an ethical institution...

    13. Re:This is common by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why should IT bear the brunt? Let's just open our borders completely and see how much cops, nurses, and mailmen make after we open up their position to everybody on earth.

      Do you really think Americans should receive no preference in getting American jobs? If your vision is realized, then countries are just meta-corporations with no alleigence to their own citizens. In that case, do you think anybody will be dumb enough to join the military in their defense?

    14. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well then, let's bring back slavery.

      You know, when someone says "anything that can be done cheaper should be done cheaper", they probably mean within the context of the law - but you want to prove the counterpoint by stepping outside the law. Do you think all comments should have caveats out the wazoo - or take 'em at face value as being applicable to the general case and within the context of legal discussion?

    15. Re:This is common by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      "Everybody wants cheaper prices "

      EXACTLY. If you don't like the fact a company uses H1B employees or outsources, boycott the company...but of course, when they offer the cheaper product, all of a sudden how many H1B employees they have or how much work is outsourced doesn't matter.

      "WOW. A 750GB HDD for $49.99!"

    16. Re:This is common by raider_red · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is already subverting the free market by opening a loophole which allows employers to look outside their home market in order to undercut workers in their own market.

      It's unethical for two reasons. First, the H1B regulations require that employers pay prevailing market rates for the talent they're importing, which they clearly aren't. Second, it provides a lever to help lower everyone else's salaries, while the executives pocket huge bonuses for dubious reasons.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    17. Re:This is common by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... when someone says "anything that can be done cheaper should be done cheaper", they probably mean within the context of the law

      So if slavery was legal, then it would be OK?
      If memory serves, it was legal at one point.
      Just because something is legal, does not make it right or best.

      Which was my point of my original post:
      The 'anything that can be done, should be done' argument should be tempered with some ethics.

    18. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is common and I am one of those H1-B workers paid the salary of an entry-level consultant 6 years later and doing the job of a senior consultant.

      my company does NOT know I have passed the first step of the green card lottery and i am (ins'h Allah) on my way to freedom.

      --anothercowardwhodoesn'twanttoscrewuphischances!

    19. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, if the employer is following the H-1B rules, it is illegal, much less unethical. Prevaling wage is the law. Take a look at the IEEE-USA website for examples of what should be followed by employers. It also shows examples that this study also found. http://www.ieeeusa.org/policy/issues/H1bvisa/

      Its not that I don't mind competing with other engineers and programmers, its that many companies don't follow the rules, putting those who do at a disadvantage. Maybe I'm still looking through rose colored glasses, but I think there should be some fairness in enforcing what rules are on the books.

      Don't even get me started on the hand ringing from Bill Gates and many other tech. leaders about not having enough trained engineers in the US. Why should my kids go into engineering when they can have a more secure career elsewhere. It would be tough for me to recommend my kind of career to students today.

    20. Re:This is common by yogkarma · · Score: 1

      Here is the path

      H1b---->Green Card (GC) ----->US Citizen.

      You tell me if less money is the only concern why same US company file for Green Card for those who work on H1b.

      I know so many people who came to USA on h1b program 6 years back, got their green card and now waiting for US Citizenship. You know what, they cry a lot when they see new h1b quota increases, as they fear most to loose their high-tech job or good package to work in India.

      In 1999 when I told people that outsourcing is the future of IT, few friends call me and told me why I spread the roomer. At that time, they are in middle of their GC process.

      Dog eat dog.

      Therefore, if you are an American by birth and you are in your 25+ age you should not worry much.

      There is very systematic, silent world going on in IT market. Reality is different. I always see things with emotion, and emotion of IT is sad.

      Just think this scenario, what h1b worker will do if there is no work in USA? He is not even capable to work in McDonald. He will go back and do something else in India or do national time pass cricket.

      H1b job is nothing but an organic fertilizer for American hybrid economy.

    21. Re:This is common by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Do you think these foreign workers sould be entitled to some sort of guaranteed wage minimum, comparable to those holding similar skills that are native to the country?"

      Actually yes.

      Follow my logic here...

      If the intent of H1B is to get talent that simply isn't available locally, then the best way to treat these workers is to give them a green card the moment they're hired. That way, there is no pressure to stay with an employer if they are underpaid. If takes away any incentive to underpay these folks because they'll simply move elsewhere. That protects the H1B and the American worker.

      If the intent of the H1B is to get cheaper labor, then these folks are little better than indentured servent filling out time being underpaid for the promise of a green card after 5 years. If that's the intent of the law, then lets be honest about it and stop lying about the lack of local talent.

      [BTW: You can tell an ad to prove no local talent exists... its always like this:
        WANTED: Senior Oracle DBA (10+ yr) with extensive Java programming skills, and Masters Degree in Mathematics. Salary up to $48K depending on relevant experience.]

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    22. Re:This is common by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      This is already subverting the free market by opening a loophole which allows employers to look outside their home market in order to undercut workers in their own market.

      Actually, it allows the free market to operate more broadly, but only for employers. Employees generally find it difficult to move to places like India.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Spelling and Americans, you must be kidding me!!! I work with couple of american co-workers and I pitty their written English.. God help them!!

    24. Re:This is common by Excen · · Score: 1

      If your vision is realized, then countries are just meta-corporations with no alleigence to their own citizens. In that case, do you think anybody will be dumb enough to join the military in their defense?

      I'd join up to get the cushy desk job at Halliburton after 8 years of paper-pushing way back from the front lines.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    25. Re:This is common by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      IT is a liability to a company rather than an asset. It doesn't provide any increase to the value of a company's products, but it is necessary for the continued functioning of that company. In that vein, it is similar to the physical plant. IT workers provide the information equivilant of janitorial or maintenance work, except they never have to clean up shit and are rarely in danger of losing a limb while making repairs. So, how much more than maintenance should IT workers get?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    26. Re:This is common by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      This is why I (BS's in computer science and math, served honorably in the military [unlike draft-dodging Dick-soon-to-be-indicted-Cheney and deserter Bushie Wushie], solid work record) am now only able to get under-the-table work in this pathetic piss-ante country and third-world country.

      The only terrorists I know of are in Congress and working for the corporations.

    27. Re:This is common by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Let's just open our borders completely and see how much cops, nurses, and mailmen make after we open up their position to everybody on earth."

      Nurses are an exception, but generally few people come to the US intent on becoming a cop or a postal worker. Police forces specifically have a long history of employing poor imigrants that can't get jobs elsewhere (consider the stereotype of the Irish cop). In general, however, these are jobs that you don't need to leave the country of your birth to do.

      Programming is one of those jobs that you need to go to the developed world to do. If it ain't North America, it's Western Europe, Eastern Asia or Australia.

      "In that case, do you think anybody will be dumb enough to join the military in their defense?"

      On the other hand, we have a situation where foreign nationals sign up to go to Iraq with the intent to become citizens. And while Washington will continue to swear up and down that it isn't official policy to "fast-track" soldiers, it sure doesn't help, and Congress has a habit of granting posthumous citizenship.

    28. Re:This is common by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      Why should IT bear the brunt? Let's just open our borders completely and see how much cops, nurses, and mailmen make after we open up their position to everybody on earth.

      Actually, what we really need are more H1-B doctors and lawyers, to drive their rates down from the stratosphere to something more reasonable like in other countries. While we're at it, maybe a few H1-B CEOs as well.

    29. Re:This is common by raider_red · · Score: 1

      "it allows the free market to operate more broadly, but only for employers."

      It's not a free market unless all sides have equal access.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    30. Re:This is common by john.r.strohm · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a matter of fact, the United States is *ALREADY* importing nurses from literally every country on the planet.

      The problem is that, due to managed care, nursing wages are low, nursing workloads are high, wards are running on skeleton crews, and the nurses aren't stupid. They're getting out of nursing faster than the domestic nursing schools can graduate new ones.

      There have already been a couple of cases of U.S. hospital wards where the operating language was Tagalog, not English. This is OK as long as all the nurses speak both languages, not so good if the Filipino nurses only speak halting English, and pure hell for any US-born nurses who don't speak Tagalog. Not to mention the effects on quality of patient care...

      Incidentally, the foreign-born nurses aren't entirely happy with the situation, either. Yes, the money is good, but they really don't like some of the things they see happening with quality of care and nursing workload any more than the US nurses do. (I had a very interesting chat one night, while I was hospitalized, with a Filipino nurse some years ago.)

    31. Re:This is common by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Why is it unethical? Because you don't like it? Do you think these foreign workers sould be entitled to some sort of guaranteed wage minimum, comparable to those holding similar skills that are native to the country?

      Let's see, paying someone a lower salary based on their ethnicity. Yeah, that sounds unethical. If they were U.S. citizens, without the threat of being deported for not agreeing to those terms, they could take their employer to court for discrimination. If we're talking about H1B workers living in the U.S., they are having to pay the same for rent, food, utilities as the "natives", So why shouldn't they be paid the same?

      It's already been screwed in many industries by union-forced excessive wages - look at those industries on their ass today because they can't lower their expenses enough to compete with the availability of cheaper, yet sufficiently skilled labor.

      Unions do hold an inordinate amount of power, yes. They have grown beyond their original purpose (making sure workers were not exploited in the sweatshops of the '30's) to being a group know for artifically inflating wages and mireing themselves in corruption.

      Everybody wants cheaper prices - until it's their rice bowl being looked at.

      That's just greed and consumerism (as in get somehting for nothing way, not in the protect consumer rights way). Marketers are partailly responsible for this climate. Car dealships running neverending sales, cable companies allowing customers to hop from one promotion to another, people get conditioned to paying less than the "normal" price for anything and don't seem to feel the provider is entitled to making any sort of margin for what they do. Plus, there may be a growing resentment to executives getting paid salaries many times what the rank and file are, when their actions are percieved (and rightly so sometimes) to be of less importance then the average joe's duties when it comes to the company's success.

    32. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's pity.

      -An American

    33. Re:This is common by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      what we really need are more H1-B doctors and lawyers, to drive their rates down from the stratosphere

      Excellent care of my pink little body is one thing I'm willing to pay a premium for.

    34. Re:This is common by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      Total BS. You know all that increased productivity that American workers are responsible for? That is due to IT, computerization, automation. In fact despite our increases in productivity, wages have not increased as much to reward it. For a decade our productivity has helped us compete.

    35. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If your vision is realized, then countries are just meta-corporations with no alleigence to their own citizens.
      > In that case, do you think anybody will be dumb enough to join the military in their defense?

      Not sure how to say that without offending anyone, but ...

      yes.

    36. Re:This is common by bommai · · Score: 1

      You think american doctors are better than those in other countries. You are wrong!! I have had many doctors in India that were way better than the ones in the US. Also, my current family doctor is Indian (in the US) and consider him one of my best doctors. I agree. Doctors get paid way too much here. But they also get creamed by the insurance and law industries!

    37. Re:This is common by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Consider how poor worker productivity would be if the toilets constantly overflowed, there was no TP, the air conditioner was stuck on "blast hot air through the mold colony" except during the winter when it sticks on "blast cold air through the mold colony", walls were missing and roaches infested the cafeteria. Then tell me what physical plant is worth.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    38. Re:This is common by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you aren't one of those people crying for cheaper drugs! :)

    39. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why should IT bear the brunt? Let's just open our borders completely and see how much cops, nurses, and mailmen make after we open up their position to everybody on earth."
      Seems like a good idea.

      "In that case, do you think anybody will be dumb enough to join the military in their defense?"
      Imagine all the people...

    40. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't work for McDonalds by any chance?

    41. Re:This is common by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      I dont understand your point. Physical plant is worth something and I believe it increases the value/quality of the output.

    42. Re:This is common by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      IT and physical plant are the cost of doing business, but they're not related to the actual business of any specific company (except IT and plant management companies). I'm suggesting that they provide similar functions: facilitating the activies that actually do make the company money, that they have equivalent value to a company and so you should expect similar compensation.

      You don't actually see that because physical plant has been largely commoditized whereas IT has not yet. To a certain extent, it's still riding high on the overemphasis it recieved during the dot-com boom.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    43. Re:This is common by xero314 · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that you and so many others think that cheaper is better. It has been speculated that cheaper is not always better. In 2000 Joel Spolsky set up Frog Creek Software to prove that Better Programmers make Better Software.

      I would suggest reating the above article and few other things by Joel to get an understanding of why it's not always best to go for the cheapest option. You do after all get what you pay for.

      Oh and by the way I am totaly unaffiliated with Joel Spolsky, I just have a similar thinking that he sums up real well.

    44. Re:This is common by screenrc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Spectacular thinking! Do you realize that even the toilet paper
      contributes towards generating revenue?
      And so is electricity, and so is lots of other things.


      And do you suppose the seed of the farmer
      are 'just a liability'? The seed, the manure, and pencils,
      are all directly contributing towards generating his income.


      The toilet paper in the bathrooms (to you, 'liability')
      is actually more important than the last sale. Is it not?

    45. Re:This is common by sjdude · · Score: 1
      Actually, what we really need are more H1-B doctors and lawyers, to drive their rates down from the stratosphere to something more reasonable like in other countries. While we're at it, maybe a few H1-B CEOs as well.
      After being depressed by outsourcing and all the H1-B fraud the past couple of years, I decided it would be great if we turned US politics over to H1-B's or outsourced it altogether. Then maybe everybody could afford to buy a U.S. Congressman or Senator, like the super rich already do! Imagine buying political access for $1000 instead of $50000?!!! Cool! Bring it on!
    46. Re:This is common by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      Anything? Well then, let's bring back slavery. Then workers don't need to be paid at all.

      when you have slaves, then you also have to feed and clothe them, and look after their health... after all, they're an expensive investment and their value depreciates fast unless looked after... employees on the other hand, you only have to pay them... everything else is their problem...

      I'm of the opinion that the north really went for freeing slaves only because they realised that it would be cheaper for business in the long run... the other "moral" arguments were mainly to get the waverers on their side, but the reduced costs for business and the potential for future profit was the main reason.

      what we now have is known as wage slavery for a very good reason, you have to feed, house and clothe yourself, and to do that, you have to work... and the work is only available at the rates they offer... cos there's plenty more people looking for that same job... they've got you in bondage to the moneylenders by having you take out loans to house yourself, so you have no real choice but to work.

      Unless you're in England, where loads of unemployed find they effectively get an income cut when they start work... cos their "benefits" drop more than the job brings in. Deity, we're nuts over here... we house single mothers and have them jump to the front of the housing queue as well... so what do young girls do??? they get pregnant... cos the child is a meal ticket to major benefits like a house and money for life (until the child turns 16...)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    47. Re:This is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "when you have slaves, then you also have to feed and clothe them, and look after their health... after all, they're an expensive investment and their value depreciates fast unless looked after... employees on the other hand, you only have to pay them... everything else is their problem... "

      Of course clothes for slaves are optional :)
      Health is only important if the purchase price of fresh slaves combined with the training expense for the job they get to do is higher than the cost of healthcare (which it often was in the US by the time slavery was abolished because of the high cost of transporting slaves to the new world by use of European well-paid labour).

      "what we now have is known as wage slavery for a very good reason, you have to feed, house and clothe yourself, and to do that, you have to work... and the work is only available at the rates they offer... cos there's plenty more people looking for that same job... they've got you in bondage to the moneylenders by having you take out loans to house yourself, so you have no real choice but to work. "

      Correct. I'm lucky there are no moneylenders after me but I don't make enough to be able to survive for long without a job.
      That means I can't quit unless I've another signed contract already, which in the current economic climate is very hard to get indeed (and wouldn't pay much better than what I've now anyway).
      So I'm basically stuck with what I can get in the way of jobs and (potential) employers know that.
      By having a company culture of casual dress (note, I wouldn't want to work in a strict dress culture, I've done it and hated it) they can also see if you're planning something.
      Turn up in a suit and tie and leave early, and you leave a very clear sign you're going to a job interview...

      "so what do young girls do??? they get pregnant... cos the child is a meal ticket to major benefits like a house and money for life (until the child turns 16...)"

      At which point they'll have made sure to have another one...

    48. Re:This is common by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Do you really think Americans should receive no preference in getting American jobs?

      Americans have no problems ignoring American producers selling overpriced goods in favour of cheap foreign imports, so why should companies not bring in foreign workers rather than overpriced Americans? Seems you want to have your cake and eat it. Where are all your computers made? And clothes?

      If your vision is realized, then countries are just meta-corporations with no alleigence to their own citizens.

      It's not countries bringing in foreign workers, it's companies. Companies are independent of the government, why should they give unearned preference to citizens of a certain passport? Unless you think people shouldn't have personal freedoms but should live a government-prescribed life.

      Discriminating based on nationality sounds like some ancient archaic practice, and is incredibly immoral. Surely anyone should be allowed to work anywhere? Borders are arbitrary, nationality is an accident of birth. If someone is born within one set of political boundaries, I don't see why they should be be restricted from living and earning a living in another set of political boundaries.

      This whole article is pathetic. Earlier in the thread there was someone complaining about how he can't compete with cheap foreign workers, but how he needs a lot of money because he lives in Silicon Valley. HANG ON A MINUTE: YOU LIVE IN ONE OF THE RICHEST, MOST PRIVELEDGED AREAS IN THE WORLD, AND EARN MORE THAN 99% OF EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD, AND YOU'RE COMPLAINING ABOUT NOT HAVING ENOUGH MONEY?

    49. Re:This is common by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Hmm, and I always thought those types of ads were just a bad sign about their management or HR deptartments. Maybe we should all start responding to them when we see them. If we all sent an email to ad's like that trying to correct their misunderstanding of what a proper payscale is, it would really screw up the "we don't get no responses" ratios that company was trying to prove :D

      --
      Whee signature.
    50. Re:This is common by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "This is already subverting the free market by opening a loophole which allows employers to look outside their home market in order to undercut workers in their own market."

      It's subverting the limited, established somewhat-free-within-political-boundaries market as defined by governmental entities.

      It's not a free market when you can't hire whomever you want.

      The fact of the matter is that local and national markets are fast being swallowed by a global market for goods, for capital, and for labor.

      Sticking our head in the sand isn't going to do us any good.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    51. Re:This is common by MadHatter2005 · · Score: 1

      "pitty"? Tsk tsk.

    52. Re:This is common by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      By having a company culture of casual dress (note, I wouldn't want to work in a strict dress culture, I've done it and hated it) they can also see if you're planning something. Turn up in a suit and tie and leave early, and you leave a very clear sign you're going to a job interview...

      I take a day off sick/vacation... far less obvious.

      in fact, they keep popping them out year after year... cos the more they have, the more benefits they have and they get a bigger house... there was this couple in the newspaper a few months ago, she had some 12 kids, and he was signed off as unable to work due to health problems... they were getting some £30,000 plus in benefits (including the rental paid on the 6 bedroom house) and they were still moaning thay they had it hard... an employer local to them offered him a job and he refused cos it would mean that a whole host of benefits would be taken away from them...

      I'm in the rather unfortunate situation (depends how you look at it really then) of being in receipt of a pension for having completed 22 years in the armed forces... this pension, magically, is the same level as the minimum income, so if I were to be unemployed, I can't get any benefits at all, as the pension is supposed to be sufficient, but it isn't as I would have nothing left after deducting my outgoings on rent and council tax.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    53. Re:This is common by mrlpz · · Score: 1

      No putz...because there will ALWAYS be the idiot who truly isn't qualified for the position, and hungry enough for a "shot at stardom" to send in their resume. Invariably in today's job market, you will get 100-300 resumes for almost ANY skilled IT position you put out there. I've had to cull through HUNDREDS of resume's in the past, and I can tell you from experience.....we're going this to ourselves.

      Go in peace.

  5. Cost to hire? by fataugie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone considered the cost to aquire and hold H1-B1 papers for a overseas worker? What about when the contract is up? The company is responsible to return the worker, who pays for that?

    --

    WTF? Over?

    1. Re:Cost to hire? by BlueCup · · Score: 1

      Good point, but im guessing all of that doesn't equal 20,000 a year.

      --
      WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
    2. Re:Cost to hire? by tweedledopey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, in the past this was called indentured servitude. You can come to America, but you have to work here for a while for the man getting paid little or nothing. Oh, and don't complain, or we'll ship you back.

    3. Re:Cost to hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A quick look at travel.yahoo.com says I can send an indian worker back to India TONIGHT for $1778 going Chicago(ORD) -> Newark(EWR) -> Hong Kong(HKG) -> Bangladesh(DAC)

      Given that HKG is in China, and near Taiwan, and the rest of asia is even closer I think that about covers that.

      Nice try, but please, save it.

      Having dated a Taiwanese girl, I can tell you first hand that they:
      a) pay for the visa processing out of their own pocket.
      b) have to work the first two months withount pay while their visas process, otherwise the company will find someone else in the meantime.
      c) are paid less than they deserve, but think it's generous that they get a job at all, and so accept far less than they can negotiate.
      d) send half of what they make back home, because $500 a month buys a lot of stuff in taiwan.
      e) get really pissed when their sister back home blows the excess cash on american designer jeans instead of paying her college tuition.

      Posted AC because GF reads slashdot.

    4. Re:Cost to hire? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article and referenced study is useless. It doesn't account for permit fees and the cost of regulation compliance, it doesn't control for the employee's age/experience/skills. It tries to generalize across huge categories of workers (programmer/analyst?) that in reality vary wildly.

      The theory that "funny-named people who speak with an accent tend to have a harder time getting hired for as much money" is as equally sound of a conclusion as this guy's conclusion. At least my theory could actually be proved if you used better information in the study. It's a lot harder to prove a mind-reading result with financial data, as opposed to say, a controlled survey of the people who have hired H1-B workers.

      The article can be summed up as:

      1. Add up some random salary facts
      2. Ignore any major controls for those facts
      3. Draw completely irrelevent conclusion (He makes a socialogical conclusion reading employers minds based on financial data.)
      4. Post a commentary to /. in order to get traffic and notice. Make sure your conclusion is in line with /. reader's financial interests.
      4. ????
      5. Profit!

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    5. Re:Cost to hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it winds up being a lot more than 20k if you ration it out (please excuse the overuse of the male pronoun):

      Lets say the cost of moving a person (just that person, you aren't obliged as an employer to bring the family along) is somewhere in the range of $5-8k. We'll say that covers the overhead of your people arranging things, the cost of a flight, plus some air-frieght (can anyone dispute these numbers for obvious reason?)

      Now lets say you keep the guy for 3 years then send him back. You pay the same $5-8k to send him back. Now, you kept him for 3 years, so you saved $60k in salary alone. Shave off the $10-15k you paid bringing him here and sending back and you're still golden.

      So what if you didn't keep him for even one year? Lets say you send him packing after 6 months.. Well the best part is that you only pay for 6 months of salary! Yes, you lose money that way but your 6 month experiment only cost $27k salary + $15k sending him back and forth.. $52k. Which is what you would have paid the local guy for a whole year.

      For every H-1B you keep for 3 years you save enough money to send a bad apple back and forth.

      However, I'm willing to bet that they don't send a lot of people back after 6 months. The H-1B's want desperately to stay. They'll work unpaid overtime, bend over backwards, etc.

      Anyway, this is all speculation in my head, so don't mod me up unless someone else adds some cred to my words.

    6. Re:Cost to hire? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Has anyone considered the cost to aquire and hold H1-B1 papers for a overseas worker? What about when the contract is up? The company is responsible to return the worker, who pays for that?

      Who cares? H1-Bs are supposed to be paid the prevailing wage, not used as cheap labor. That's part of why getting foreign workers is a pain - we have a bias towards hiring locally, as we should.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Cost to hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you no complain about my sister jeans when they on you floor, asshoole!

    8. Re:Cost to hire? by orderb13 · · Score: 1

      Your logic is flawed.

      What makes you think that they pay any moving costs at all, not even considering 8K worth of costs. Companies don't do that much for "grunt" work. If you want the job you pay for the move yourself.

      Also, the only difference between hiring and H1B and a "local" worker and then droping them after six months if the cost of flying them back and forth. They still get work out of both of them, even though the work may suck.

      And how many H1B's have you heard about being sent back after 6 months anyways? I haven't heard of any even though I've known a few who needed to have that happen to them.

    9. Re:Cost to hire? by beef+curtains · · Score: 3, Funny

      A quick look at travel.yahoo.com says I can send an indian worker back to India TONIGHT for $1778 going Chicago(ORD) -> Newark(EWR) -> Hong Kong(HKG) -> Bangladesh(DAC)

      One problem with this: Dhaka (formerly spelled Dacca, hence the airport code DAC) = the capital of Bangladesh.

      Bangladesh != India.

      Cancelling the contract of the Indian H1-B in question is one thing...but dumping his ass off in the wrong country that same day? Do you plan on kicking his dog too? ;)

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    10. Re:Cost to hire? by rob.wolfe · · Score: 1
      Has anyone considered the cost to aquire and hold H1-B1 papers for a overseas worker? What about when the contract is up? The company is responsible to return the worker, who pays for that?

      I am a Canadian citizen who works in the US at the moment and get regularly told that a potential client wants someone on an H-1B rather than someone on a TN-1 (the easiest on the employer form of visa I have ever seen). The explanation that I am generally given is that they can get someone "longer term" on a 3 year, once renewable, H-1B than on the annually(and perpetually from all indications) renewable TN-1, which is not actually the case. Of course I have also got the explanation that they don't like to deal with Canadians because of "language issues" they have had.

      My sneaking thought has always been that it has more to do with the fact that Canadians are not afraid to charge normal market rates and can easily drive home if they discover that they are getting paid $30/hour less than the person sitting beside them. But that could be just me being cynical

      As for the cost of returning someone home ... get serious, I can buy a 1 way business class ticket to anywhere in the world as well as shipping costs for a full size cargo container for less than $15,000

    11. Re:Cost to hire? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      > What about when the contract is up?

      Page 42, section ii, under subsection 8.1 of 'Succesfull Capitalism'
      it is perfectly reasonable to kill them once we are done with them.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    12. Re:Cost to hire? by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

      To add to that....

      There are reasons why h1bs have lower wages: like the time it takes the USCIS to do anything. They take months. and months. and years. While in processing, you often can't change status or the application is dropped. You can't even leave the country sometimes. This limits people's job mobility. When you are in processing, and they screw up, they give themselves another 90 days to do the job (despite the law). It is the worst bureaucracy ever. Plus you have to hire lawyers to make sure that all the 'i's are dotted etc. $10 or $15K for a green card in lawyers fees. Kiss a big chunk of that 'buh bye' if you're laid off or switch jobs some time in that five year process. Also related is that sometimes USCIS takes so long that even when you apply for renewal looong before, stuff expires and you can't work all the sudden. That leaves gaps in your employment history. You can't really go to a company and say: would you kindly hire me when USCIS finishes the application some time from 30 to 180 days in the future? They'd say 'piss off'. Rightfully so too.

      They also are screwed if their job lays them off (OK, sell your house and move to a foreign country in 1 week! Now go!). This is a disincentive to getting the highest pay that is available. One chooses security in this situation--not highest the wage. If you get an extra $20K you might be first on the cutting floor if there are layoffs. Pack up the dogs ma! Also, one often wants a company to sponser them in the "green card" process. If you are getting a middling wage, the company is probably more likely to sponser, all things being equal.

      Third, there is often a language/cultural barrier. Communication is important. If you can't sell yourself, you can't sell your employer on a great wage.

      Fourth, there is a fee for the company. Many do not have the legal resources or the time to manage the paperwork. This limits choice for the employee.

      So if you do not want folks from other countries going underground and working for nothing, fix USCIS. That way it isn't so difficult for them to stay legit, and they'll demand better wages. If English is your native language and you're better educated than 90% of applicants, you have the ability to battle them without lawyers. If you only speak Spanish and are not familiar with bureaucratic procedures, you don't have a hope.

      I think that many over-estimate how many people would come to the US if it was a free-for-all. Fact is that living costs mirror wages. It is not as big as an incentive as one might think. After all, look at the EU: a Greek can go work in Germany for much higher wages. But most Greeks prefer souvlaki to sourkrout.

      Besides, I've never ever ever ever met an American working another country. Ever. (OK, quite a few) = )

      Cheers,
      -b

    13. Re:Cost to hire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it is perfectly reasonable to kill them once we are done with them.

      Look, I'm sorry but our itellectual property is now inside your head. Our non compete policy is very strict.
    14. Re:Cost to hire? by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Who cares?
      Oh, I don't know...maybe the company sponsering the person?

      It's called Cost of doing business. If my expenses are higher with an H1-B1, and the billing rate stays the same (why penalize the client company), why should I take a lower profit? If the H1-B1 wants to work for me, then they are going to take the lower wage because it costs me more.

      If they don't like the deal.....don't take it. Stay home.

      --

      WTF? Over?

  6. From the well-duh dept. by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A new study shows that companies hire foreign workers for cheap labor, not skill.

    I'm curious, did anyone at all believe otherwise?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      In other news, water is wet, and the sky is blue.

    2. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm sure the HB-1 workers believed otherwise, as well as a few people who've have bad experience with non HB-1 workers, and good experiences with HB-1 workers.

      But I'm sure theres a significant percentage of HB-1s who are less skilled and very less paid than their american counterparts.

      The american way, screw everyone to make a buck. Err, figuratively, anyway.

    3. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      Congress and Industry like to pretend so.

      Rubbing their noses in hard evidence might make it harder for them to continue.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:From the well-duh dept. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      the sky is blue

      In California, this probably is news to a lot of people.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Terralthra · · Score: 1

      No, we had that one all figured out.

      --
      -Terralthra...
    6. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean Redmond?

    7. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, did anyone at all believe otherwise?

      I don't know; do politicians count as people?
    8. Re:From the well-duh dept. by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I came on an L-1 visa and had close to 15 years experience in my field. I'm paid better than most of my coworkers and I'm currently in the top 5% that the company want to retain at all cost. My company also sponsor green cards for the workers that need them.

      In some areas, it doesn't matter where you come from as long as you have the right skills. I'm from a north european country and can honestly say that I will not get an American citizenship, ever. I probably move back home in 5 - 10 years time and retire.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    9. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > HB-1 workers

      Hos and Brothel workers?

      > But I'm sure theres a significant percentage
      > of HB-1s who are less skilled and very less paid
      > than their american counterparts

      Do our women really need the competition? "Give it up or I'm goin' down to that red glowing light, sweetie!" ??

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    10. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Troll

      My brother works for a fortune100 company in the deep south.

      He only pays H1B1 visa wages based on average salary employees in his county. The american programmers refused to work for under 70grand a year for jr software development jobs. The average pay for a jr programmer is around 34k a year. So he hired indians for 40k a year to get it done. Plain and simple.

      Still above the average pay scale I may add.

      Then he gets all angry when he reads slashdot and hears software developers complaining. IN the .com bubble none of you wanted to work for a reasonable wage. Why should he care now? In his view the H1B1 visas only brought in qualified workers for the averate rates and it was never about a way to cut costs.

      Now the situation is improving and programmers with 10 years of experience are willing to work for 30k (pay went down) but still the Indians are usually more qualified and proved their loyality during the .com rush so he prefers indians unless he can find a good american to do the job.

    11. Re:From the well-duh dept. by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      I call BS on this one.

      programmers with 10 years of experience are willing to work for 30k

      Really? Where can I hire some for my Fortune 100 company in the Southwest? Kids right out of school make 40K. 10 yr vets make over 70K AVERAGE. Even in the Deep South, I know, I was one in Alabama at one point in time. They must be slinging COBOL or VB where no really strong skills are required to pay that low for US employees. Fortune 100 companies usually pay OK, that sounds like the pay rates for city/county/state Government (lower wages but lifetime jobs).

      I don't think he can legally get away using his COUNTY to set pay rates. It has to be State level. Of course the H1Bs are not going to complain about 40K salary, they make 6-8K in India!!

    12. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Linus.

    13. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, as a longtime Subway customer I know how they struggle to retain their best sandwich artists.

    14. Re:From the well-duh dept. by speakup · · Score: 0

      I'm on an H1B and I make well over 100k a year. I'm not a junior programmer and my employer spent a year trying to find an American to fill the position. I'd have been promoted long ago if the H1B allowed it or if the green card process didn't take 7 friggin years to complete.

      You can't generalize about H1Bs like this. Sure it makes for reactionary fodder at slashdot but it's way too simplistic for reality.

    15. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always exceptions to the rule. You are
      an expection. Most people that are hired on L-1
      visa are not from Europe and they are paid less
      than their co-workers who are U.S. citizens. It's
      odd that there are lots of qualified Europeans who
      need work and are probably willing to work for
      less than average pay, but you don't see U.S.
      corporations trying to get them here do you? There
      is a reason for that. It's because they *are* European.
      The diversity gods have determined that we have too
      many European-Americans here already, so most of
      you need not apply. It's for the same reasons that
      our immigration policies have been changed to
      favor non European immigration. That doesn't mean
      that no Europeans will immigrate here or that some
      will not come here on L1 visas; it's just that the
      system has been changed to not encourage it.

    16. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      No the average programmer in Tennesse makes 35k for under 3 years experience according to county and state levels. Perfectly legally and what a programer is worth.

      Today someone with 5+ years of experience may be worth45-50k ayear in that part of the country.

      I take it the moderators disagree but that is my brothers viewpoint and he is right in one area. Someone out of school SHOULD NOT BE MAKING 75k+ with no experience! Indians were willing to come in at 40k. That is more than enough to live in that part of the country if your young.

      Keep in mind my brother does not pay for 40k a year for those with 10 years experience. Its just that today people are begging to work for 35k a year and move into an apartment rather than flip burgers because the economy is bad thanks to outsourcing.

      But in his mind H1B1 visas were never about hiring cheap workers. Just was used for those willing to work for *average* wages based on the department of labor when americans acted all snotty and demanding. He had a right to look for value. Can you blame him?

    17. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. Exactly the same here. European. >10yrs experience. 100k H1B. Green Card took 7 years. I have a PhD -- a higher degree is a requirement of H1Bs, which seems to be lost on the opponents. I pay my US taxes and send no money back to my country of birth.

      This is another of those debates that's so polarized it's very difficult to have an intelligent exchange. I feel for the natives who can't seem to find work. I personally don't understand the discrepancies. I presume there must be abuse from bad companies -- just like bad people avoid tax and drive over the speed limit. It's frustrating when there are many good employers and legitimate H1Bs and we're all tarred with the same job-stealing brush.

    18. Re:From the well-duh dept. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Seems like nobody got my joke. It was about all the smog in certain parts of california, which stops you from being able to see the sky.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:From the well-duh dept. by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Source for those figures please.."Kids" with a BS in CompSci are getting hired for a LOT more than 30K. When I got my degree back in 1984, I made 30K! Now if you just mean any old person off the street who has a Microsoft cert or some classes at the Jr. College level you are about right in salary. Of course, I no longer write code, I consult on IT Systems Architectures and manage Development Projects. I don't mind paying for skills, I have had H1B's working for me and found within the narrow window of their experience and knowledge they do fine. Don't expect innovation or self-starters, and don't expect really good code, it works but it won't be fast, tight or reusuable.

      If your brother will only pay (afford?) 40K for 10 yr vets then all he will get is H1B's. No one is going to sit in a place 10 yrs to make a 10K raise. Right now the market is red-hot for experienced programmers in areas like Java, J2EE and .NET, not so much so for VB, COBOL,and "web designers".

      I doubt your brother sets his budgets, so he has to live within what he was given. So, if he was given an "average" budget for salaries based on what the company HR says is average salary, then he will get "average" people (mostly H1B's). If he wants to have a kick-butt IT department he has to step up and pay for talent. People who ask for more money are not always BSing you, often they are worth it has been my experience.

      I think the whole problem is that all programmers are not equal in real life however badly the State Employment Agency wants them to be, thus the salary averages should be broken out in degreed vs non-degreed, and also into other skill levels such as Java/J2EE, etc. which I think would show higher averages in the areas that require more skill.

    20. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the fact that people applying today with 10 years experience are willing to work for 35k a year. Not that its his price ceiling. There are not alot of employers in Memphis.

      Potential employees in 1999 came in they all demanded no less than 75k a year with everything less than a sr title in their resume. This is why my brother wanted H1B1 visas. They worked harder and he could work within the budget. I believe he likes to give jr developers projects in VB and access while the sr guys did the hard core coding. So he has no issues

      Today he still pays people what they are worth according to the department of labors guidelines with other people in his area. Fedex and perhaps the headquarters for Holiday inn are the only real industry in that part of the country so the wages are quite low for that reason.

      But yes not all h1b1 visas are for cheap labor and the parent wanted to know if that were true. If you want cheap than outsource is the answer.

    21. Re:From the well-duh dept. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Also I have been reading posts here about sr level unix administrators making 25k a year in places like Canada who have cs degrees because the demand for native american and canadian programmers are low with an oversupply from the .com age.

      I do not know if its true but I see posts like that and replies stating that is how much they are worth.

      I was giving an example i was familiar with h1b1 visas and todays climate of hiring in certain parts of the country. I imagine in places with more industry that programmers are paid alot more then in rural areas.

  7. They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

    And thats the real problem. Then again, i live in the middle of nowhere. Maybe i should start offering outsourcing for companies in CA who dont want to pay their programmers $80k+ a year

    --

    "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    1. Re:They make more than me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's what I've always wondered. There are plenty (ok, maybe not as much as in Socal) of skilled programmers in the Midwest who earn much less. I can appreciate why they want their offices in big, expensive cities, but why not outsource within?

    2. Re:They make more than me by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
    3. Re:They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Hey, i thought it was a good idea too. Im in the 2nd poorest county of New York State. I make much less than the h1b guys do in CA, but i still have a "good paying job" in my area. Love the low cost of living

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    4. Re:They make more than me by plopez · · Score: 1

      Seriously, there is a niche here. Esp. when you see the overall savings are not that big when you factor in slippage due to time-zone, cultural and language problems. As well as the sheer enormity of managing a project long distance. It is much cheaper and easier to hop on a plane for a 'face-to-face' + demos + oversight in N. America than in Asia. The resulting savings are often sub 10% when everything is factored in.

      I live in a smaller Uni town in western N. America with a good internet connection (the advantages of a Uni town) and often thought of setting up a small contract shop. The barriers as I see it would be as follows:

      1) Recruiting and retention. Everyone wants to live some place cool, even if it means being broke all the time (though as I like the outdoors, I think this place is tres cool. And I can walk to work.). This includes having to explain why moving here would warrant a 10-15k/yr lower starting pay (40K vs 50 to 55k). And the new recruits are likely to say 'You live where?'

      2) Drumming up business. Most of the body shops elsewhere have name recognition as well as the fact many of them have alumni from large US companies such as IBM, MS, Computer Associates, Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft etc. which gets their foot in the door.

      3) Capital. I can't afford to lose money for a few years during start up. And VC's are likely to say 'You live where?'.

      4) Finding adequet square footage. Most of the larger building are already taken in my area. I would have to build. See item #3.

      But if you can overcome those obstacles, you may be able to do it.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    5. Re:They make more than me by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      That's not Oneida county is it? I was there. Hole.

    6. Re:They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Mirror your location in the US (im in midle of nowhere, NY) but the rest sounds about the same. I thought about starting small, myself and maybe a buddy, mostly web based projects, but the idea is more and more interesting the more i think about it...

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    7. Re:They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      If Oneida is a hole, then cattaraugus is a pit :) Yeah, it sucks. Yeah, i want to move. No, i dont have the money to do so.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    8. Re:They make more than me by elcid73 · · Score: 1
      I checked this* I sorted by median household income and got your county as 11 and Oneida as 22. I still say it was a hole.. but you sir, you get a beer on me.

      *I don't care enough to check if the first google result I found (that looked nice appropriate) are valid, or the right source :)

    9. Re:They make more than me by wombert · · Score: 1

      H1B's are not outsourced, they're brought in. They're in the office at the right hours and accessible when needed without the time lag you get with "offshore" teams. If your Midwestern programmers are willing to relocate and deal with the sticker shock (cost of living in Silicon Valley, for example, may not be in proportion to the pay increase) they might get some enthusiastic employers.

      However, if you're going to outsource anyway and deal with the time & space differential, might as well go for the lowest bidder (often a centrally located "offshore" office, more efficient for the company than a number of telecommuting contractors).

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    10. Re:They make more than me by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Want to know womething? you can do the job of the guy in silicon valley sitting naked right there in your bedroom. They know this.

      managers today like the "control" they have over people they can touch and personally intimidate. Telecommuting works. I can do my job, including 90% of all server maintaince from my living room and do do it on a regular basis but they still make me commute 168 miles every day to come in that office and sit ther edoing the same thing I was doing at home. hell I can do it from the burger king down the street!

      until businesses get real leadership that actually understands how much they could save by having lots of the staff telecommute and only commute for meetings and special tasks american business will continue to operate horribly inefficently.

      telecommuting works well and most workers now days can sucessfully and with higher productivity telecommute.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:They make more than me by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      They do outsource to lower income areas. I interviewed with a company that opened up a branch here in Oklahoma City specifically to hire lower waged techie people. Problem is, 1) their benefits package sucked (all of the people I talked to were not even using it because they were on their spouse's plan at another job), 2) they implied that at the end of a project, they would try to put you on another one, but if one was not available, out you go. 3) they paid for 0 vacation or holidays, but there were holidays that the office was closed. 4) They offered me just barely more than I was making at my current job, so, after subtracting the holiday pay and stuff, I would have made less. 5) Their offer was about $20,000 less than the standard wage in Oklahoma City for an equivalent position which included benefits, holidays and vacation.
      I think they basically wanted to treat their employees as consultants (in fact, they called their employees employee consultants), so the employee bears all the risk, but they wanted to pay LESS than one normally would for an employee.
      I would be happy to e-mail anyone the name of the company if they would like to avoid wasting their time in an interview.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    12. Re:They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      Yeah, guess it isnt the second poorest, but i always forget about "downstate" as being a part of NYS. cattaraugus still sucks.

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    13. Re:They make more than me by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      I telecommute... after 5 pm and before 9 am. Otherwise, i'm in the office. Though, its not like i have that far to go (1 mile in a small town)

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
    14. Re:They make more than me by plopez · · Score: 1

      You actually have an advantage in that NYC, Boston, Manhatten etc. are closer. Heck you could drive to the cities for a few days to make sales calls/demos/gather requirements etc. (Hotels would probably hurt but you could stay at motel 8 or if you have friends or relations there, crash with them.)

      I would start with SME's. Thay are often more cost and results concious. Get to know the owners. Start from there.

      I am keeping it on the 'back burner' as well. Waiting and looking for an opening. I have already supported myself contracting, so I know there is work to be had out there.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    15. Re:They make more than me by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      This company insistance on locating in very very VERY expensive areas is something I don't understand. Seems like half the available IT jobs are in freaking $ilicon Living-is-Hellishly-Expensive Valley. I don't want to live in such a place, and sounds like a lot of others here don't care for that either. There are plenty of places that are inexpensive and actually pretty nice. $50K/year is just fine for a place like the middle of Kansas. (Ok, Kansas does have a tiny prob with a vocal minority wanting to teach Creationism to your children.) Heck, some of those small Kansas towns will give you land if only you will move there. Compare that to $2 million for a tiny lot in SF. How skewed do the real estate markets need to get before companies see value in moving out of expensive areas?

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  8. Of course... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

    The cost of living in CA requires you to have to make on average: 73,961 dollars.

    1. Re:Of course... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you're given a corporate apartment for 8 hours a day to sleep in shifts.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Of course... by nazzdeq · · Score: 1

      In Orange County, the price of a 2 bedroom new townhome of 1500 sq/ft cost 800k plus. If you only make 73k you'll starve to death. On that measly salary, you'll have to live about 1 hour 30 minutes out in the desert and pay $500 gas and spend 15 hours a week commuting. Or live in an apt where one beds are $1500 / month.

    3. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rent control?

      Heavy-handed environmental regulation slowing new construction?

      Oh, sure, sure. It's all "well reasoned" and "for the right reason" and "for a good cause", but words, we're talkin' words here. The reality of economics, like evolution, doesn't care about words and good intentions.

  9. Duh by OrsonKart · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A new study shows that companies hire foreign workers for cheap labor, not skill.

    Do Bears shit in the woods?

    1. Re:Duh by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 1


      Do Bears shit in the woods?

      When it's cheaper than paying for a quality shit somewhere else.

      --
      R(k)
  10. Not Suprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all of the "ONLY AMERICA, AMERICA IS THE BEST" propoganda this country loves and imperalism it pursues, they continue to offshore jobs... I say we line up and shoot all of the CEO's and Politicians and take a flamethrower to them, I'm sure I'm not alone in this wish...

    Cheers

    1. Re:Not Suprised by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1



      Hey, if you know of a mob with torches and pitchforks, sign me up!

  11. If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by RentonSentinel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    LOL... nice theory...

    1. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't want to piss off a NAFTA memeber any more than necessary, maybe?

    2. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by Retric · · Score: 1

      There are more legal temporary Mexican workers than Indian.

    3. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      We wouldn't want to piss off a NAFTA memeber any more than necessary, maybe?

      Well, okay, but how much is necessary?

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    4. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not mexican but I live in mexico and work in IT related fields. Back in '99-'00 when i was working for a software development company lots of coworkers were offered jobs and H1B visas for the US and left. This was very common back then.

      I am not sure what you are trying to say or why it was modded insightful.

      Some of the best engineers(software or otherwise) i know are mexican.

    5. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by RentonSentinel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right, but if skill was not a factor, as the article seems to imply, then virtually all H1Bs would go to Mexicans, and virtually none would go to India. After all, why go to the trouble for India, when Mexico is thousands of miles closer?

      Skill. Whether the skill is English or C++. There something about those crazy India people. They got skillz I'm afraid...

    6. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by RentonSentinel · · Score: 1

      Exactly, so why would they even bother with H1Bs if skills are not a factor?!?!? There are ample amounts of cheap labor.

      Just talk to any Democrat. The soup kitchens of America are FLOWING with cheap labor... why use H1Bs if skills are not a factor??!?!

    7. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I am not sure what you are trying to say or why it was modded insightful.

      Because making comments implying US companies (or anything else US) are racist (or anything else negative) gets modded as insightful at slashdot.

    8. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Right, but if skill was not a factor, as the article seems to imply, then virtually all H1Bs would go to Mexicans, and virtually none would go to India. After all, why go to the trouble for India, when Mexico is thousands of miles closer?

      Because Mexico isn't famous for its workers' math genius intelligence. We got no people who can recite the nth digits of pi from memory. See, if companies just said "Oh, we're just searching for cheap labor" that would awaken the rage of american workers.

      They need AN EXCUSE.

    9. Re:If this were true, why no Mexican H1Bs? by Retric · · Score: 1

      There are Mexican H1B's but H1B is just one of many "guest worker" programs. Indian workers are better at English than Mexicans (on average) and they tend to have a higher education level. India has a much higher population than Mexico but it's harder for them to get to the US so we are getting a much smaller but better skilled slice of their work force.

      I don't have exact numbers on hand feel free to look them up and correct me but India has something like 20x Mexico's population and they still send us fewer people. So while we do get some Mexican doctors to show up legally the fact that we let people come to harvest crops for a few months and then send them back really alters the average level of people we are getting.

      PS: I don't know if you have ever walked though a soup kitchen but a lot of those people are not capable of having a job. Of those that are capable, many of them do work some of the time, but it's hard to get a job when you start out on the street so they are often working under the table for vary low pay. And the illegals tend to cluster more. With several people in the same apartment they are still "poor" but they are more capable of getting by on that level of income. Overall a lot of people go from soup kitchen to working poor but a lot of people fall from poor to soup kitchen status but the people that spend little time as workers tend to be incapable of working.

      When your "poor" your not realy mobile, because if your walking around on the street you don't have money to take a bus ect.

  12. Report sponsored by The Programmer's Guild by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Working since 2000 to bring you news of how badly programmers are treated!

    Still, in reality, is this any different than Norm Matloff's reports saying exactly the same thing over the past 5 years? And does anybody REALLY have any doubt that guest worker programs are just ways to lower wages in a given industry?

    The exact same method was used to break up the California Agriculture Worker's Union back in the 1970s- and will continue to be used.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Report sponsored by The Programmer's Guild by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      And does anybody REALLY have any doubt that guest worker programs are just ways to lower wages in a given industry?

      Well apparently the law enforcement agencies have their doubts otherwise there would be a shitload of corporate executives doing time for fraud.

    2. Re:Report sponsored by The Programmer's Guild by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      It's not fraud if you can change the laws of the country to allow it, and/or get the politicians to order the bureaucracies not to enforce the laws.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Report sponsored by The Programmer's Guild by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      Actually, there _is_ a little matter of perjury to congress. We'll know the politicians are under serious heat when they start handling some of the more blatant cases of that which led up to H-1b expansion.

    4. Re:Report sponsored by The Programmer's Guild by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I greatly doubt that they ever will- after all, look who pays the money for campaign contributions (it's NOT the unemployed programmer who lost his job to an H-1b). I've personally been trying to attract attention to this by writing my congresscritters since October 2001- and it's gotten nowhere.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  13. Captain O!!! by Koil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    No kidding?? I am thoroughly shocked and appalled!! I had no idea that such incideous behavior was going on in this country.

    Please hold while I call the president on the Bat Phone...

  14. Same with Scientific Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The situation is the same with so-called postdoctoral students. They work extremely hard to get good publications in the west so that they can get a tenure-track position in their home country soon.

  15. Republican Cheap Labor Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    One of the goals of the Reagan "Revolution" was to destroy the Unions. One of the tactics was to import compliant, cheap labor. This was supposed to bring us higher growth rates. The H1-B is the perfect worker for the "new world order": can't form a union, can't vote.

    The sad thing is, the college educated Democrats are more focused on gay "marriage" than helping the American working man.

    1. Re:Republican Cheap Labor Policy by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      One of the goals of the Reagan "Revolution" was to destroy the Unions. One of the tactics was to import compliant, cheap labor. This was supposed to bring us higher growth rates.

      From an article at Federal Reserve Bank: "The performance of productivity in the U.S. economy has delivered some big surprises over the last several years. One surprise was in the latter half of the 1990s, when productivity growth surged to average an annual rate of over 3%, more than twice as fast as the rate in the previous two decades. A bigger surprise has been the further ratcheting up...productivity growth averaged around 3.8% for the 2001 through 2004 period."

      From TCS: "Annual economic growth in the eurozone has averaged less than 2 percent since 2000. The unemployment rate has averaged 9 percent thus far in 2005, compared to 5.1 percent in the U.S. Half of Germany's unemployed are classified as "long-term" compared to just 12 percent in the U.S."

  16. How to save big $ by lancejjj · · Score: 1

    The average salary for a programmer in California is $73,960, according to the OES. The average salary paid to an H-1B visa worker for the same job is $53,387; a difference of $20,573

    Employers note: You can save $20,573 per year per employee. How? Just lay off your citizen employees and replace them with low-cost H1B workers!

    Why deal with citizens with full citizenship rights when you can $ave $ave $ave with an H1B!

    1. Re:How to save big $ by Axe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can save $20,573 per year per employee Not really. Legal costs of bringing and keeping and H1B is about 10K per year. And if you compare salaries for an exact same position (not averages as in this biased study), there is no advantage.

      The fact is that the real threat is outsourcing overseas. Having some quality people coming over is a good idea: it just needs to be be better regulated. For example outlawing employing H1B workers as contractors would be a good start to get rid of most sweat shops: that brings most of the bias.

      In my group we have three H1B guys. They make more then most others and they are worth it. For cheap labor we outsource to India (with pretty bad results so far - but investors would not budge. Idiots.)

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  17. And, in other news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    illegal immigrants also get paid less than US citizens.

  18. In other news... by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    ...corporations charge too much for their products.

    1. Re:In other news... by jxyama · · Score: 1

      I realize this is a joke, but the problem is, H1B is not supposed to enable companies to "make" money. It's explicitly against the law governing H1B to hire foreign workers at reduced wage.

  19. Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by wealthychef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not sure how the assertion that these workers are less skilled is borne out here. This is just more globalization fallout. Apparently, programming skills are not as precious as we would all like to think; there are many workers in China and India that will work for less than half of what we make here; this is the same thing that has happened in other industries historically. The only way to save our skins is to continue to provide more value or agree to work for less. Programming that can be shifted overseas effectively is going to go there and no amount of complaining will do it. I say it's better to attract and hire these people here in America and let them build industries here than to push them out and artificially fix wages high here. Protectionism will not work.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how far you want to go with the protectionism. I'm sure a set of viruses specifically attacking Indian and Chinese IP address blocks would work for a short time. And of course, there's always the option taken by populations who have found their livlihoods threatened: Invasion and war.

      That last would be really interesting- the globalists usually claim that free markets prevent war rather than causing it!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by kokoloko · · Score: 1

      First, nobody said the were less skilled. The H1B program is meant to bring people who are uniquely qualified such that their skills cannot be found in the local labor pool. The disparity in pay is thus not what one would expect if that was the case and leads the to conclusion that cheap labor is the main driver of the import of H1B workers.
      Secondly, what you call "Protectionism" is really just immigration law. Why should it be okay for a software company to go to Pakistan to get a worker, but not okay for a Pakistani worker to come the the US to get a job? That's what free trade in the labor market would mean.

    3. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Protectionism will not work.

      Neither has the opposite.
    4. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by ameoba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given the numbers, there are only 2 reasonable conclusions : either that H1-B employees are considerably underpaid, or they are being brought in to fill low-ranking (ie - less skilled) positions. Either way, the H1-B program is being abused since it's supposed to find highly-skilled workers that can't be found on the local job market NOT fill up entry level positions with underpaid workers. It's really hard to argue that anyone filling an entry-level position has high-demand, specialized skills, not to mention that -not- filling entry level jobs with domestic workers will only further complicate any real existing lack of skilled domestic workers at higher levels.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    5. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Phleg · · Score: 2, Informative

      That last would be really interesting- the globalists usually claim that free markets prevent war rather than causing it!
      Strictly speaking, a globalist would claim that this kind of situation is caused by the current lack of globalism, and any kind of resistance or protectionist measures are only increasingly more likely to cause conflict of this nature; i.e., delaying and complicating the problem rather than actually doing anything about it.
      --
      No comment.
    6. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by size1one · · Score: 1
      "Protectionism will not work"

      Protectionism is general bad because you are creating an artificial increase in the cost of the end product. It didn't matter when the steel and textile industries went overseas because they were low tech jobs that didnt require 4+ years of college. Sure the jobs take some training, but not so much that you goto "steel mill" school.

      At the time our levels of education were increasing, more and more people were going to college to fill high tech jobs. The loss of jobs was being replaced by many more higher paying tech jobs. well what replaces high tech jobs? Where does a large section of workers, who went to school 4+ years for a specific field, go?

      Are education system is falling behind that of other countries. The Bush administration has cut funding left and right. The average education level is dropping and the average debt is increasing. Our economy can only spiral downward as we depend more and more on other countries for technological advancement.

      Protectionism in this case will only serve to line executives and develop other countries economies. I just hope they send us aid when the US is the biggest third world country.

    7. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are education system is falling behind that of other countries.

      Damn right it is. Hooked on Phonics worked for me!

    8. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by LearningHard · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this but speaking from personal experience. Yes the import workers are great as long as you feed them a steady diet of work that is the exact same as their professors taught them to do in college. Ask them to do something that they haven't been told how to do and they suddenly stop like they hit a brick wall. It is almost as if they are unable to go out and research to learn new skills on their own or for them to figure things out without someone spelling it out for them.

    9. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Strictly speaking, a globalist would claim that this kind of situation is caused by the current lack of globalism, and any kind of resistance or protectionist measures are only increasingly more likely to cause conflict of this nature; i.e., delaying and complicating the problem rather than actually doing anything about it.

      There's nothing anybody can do about it, was the claim above. What specifically to the globalists suggest we do about the same skillset being allowed a half a world away at 1/10th the wage? All I've ever heard is give up and spend another $40,000 to get another bachelor's degree in another area which will then be outsourced again.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bush administration has not cut funding left and right. It has cut requested growth of funding. Educational funding has actually skyrocket over the last decade, so the problem is clearly not funding.

    11. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like you to talk to any public school teacher about that. Or even better, all the teachers who voluntarily took large pay cuts to end all the teacher layoffs in their school district. Or better yet, the teaches who *were* laid off, even after those other teachers took the pay cuts because there *still* wasn't enough money to pay them. Or the teachers who took pay cuts, and still have to buy school supplies out of their own pocket. You tell them it's not the lack of funding.

    12. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by wealthychef · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure why you used the word "allowed." Do you think you can stop it? This globalist suggests you are in trouble if the work you do can be shipped overseas as 1/10th the wage. The only thing you can do as an individual is either switch careers or take a pay cut. It's the harsh truth. Another thing, and I'm not kidding here, is to invest in foreign index funds as a hedge!

      The big picture is that it helps the whole world when your job goes overseas, but that doesn't help those of us in America so affected. Here's what I suggest we do as a society if we wish to try to maintain our position as a global economic leader. We need to start providing cheap access to high quality education in America by spending a crapload of money on it as a society. Improve our schools by paying teachers more and at the same time making it easier to fire them when they stink. The benefits to us as a society would be enormous, economically, politically, and socially.

      The Chinese and the Indians get it: education is where it's at. They laud their scientists and encourage their children to study hard. We make fun of ours and spend our time watching TV and worshipping the Britney Spears' of the world. It's just a matter of time before we start getting into trouble. If we don't get educated, we'll be making shoes for the Chinese pretty soon, metaphorically speaking.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    13. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > artificially fix wages high here. Protectionism will
      > not work.

      Reaallyyy!!! How ironic that you should try and use the
      straw man of "artificially fixed wages high here". And
      just what are these wages that U.S. workers are supposed
      to compete against? Are these prevailing U.S. wages?
      Well, my, no they are not. In reality they are a form of
      "artificial" wages. Only the "articial" wages are being
      set by a third world standard of living. Seriously, are
      you some type a idiot that cannot grasp the concept of
      unequal economies? How many times does it have to be
      said? You cannot compete with people whose standard of
      living is not the same as yours. What don't you grasp?

    14. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by skipperjohn · · Score: 1
      "Protectionism will not work"

      Protectionism is always necessary to protect a country's worker citizens. This is an extreme example, but what if the US borders were opened to all countries, for all jobs (all jobs, not just some). The standard of living in the USA would deteriorate for all citizens except those who had inherited or built a considerable amount of wealth, and could live off that accumulated wealth. There would always be some country that had a lower pay level than other countries.

      H1B workers are not coming here because the working conditions and pay in their native countries are better/higher than in the USA for equivalent jobs.

      Somehow, folks have the misguided impression that our borders should be opened completely to workers (except for workers who do their jobs). They also seem to have the impression that no one would fill high-tech jobs if H1B workers were not available. Hogwash! The jobs were filled before H1B was implemented, and would be again (albeit at higher wages) if H1B were eliminated.

      Some folks in this discussion are equating overseas workers with H1B workers. If my job goes overseas, so be it. However, don't bring in someone to undercut my salary, then claim that they are being imported to fill a position that has no USA workers available.

    15. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am H1-B worker and my standard of living is far, far higher than yours will ever will be.

    16. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If wages in America go down, then the cost of living in America will go down. Taking globalisation to its natural conclusion, eventually wages and costs of living across the world will equalise, and it'll be a level playing field.

      Closing your borders and trying to prop up an artificial gradient of wages and costs of living is just delaying the inevitable.

      And if I hear one more person earning 70k cry poverty, I really am going to start shooting people.

    17. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Of course, what's to stop Chinese virus writers attacking American IP blocks? Or to stop China invading America? Unless you think that the fat, lazy, arrogant redneck American population can cope with the huge, highly-trained Chinese Army.

    18. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why you used the word "allowed." Do you think you can stop it?

      Given enough weaponry, and the use of the death penalty for traitorous CEOs, yes.

      This globalist suggests you are in trouble if the work you do can be shipped overseas as 1/10th the wage. The only thing you can do as an individual is either switch careers or take a pay cut. It's the harsh truth. Another thing, and I'm not kidding here, is to invest in foreign index funds as a hedge!

      Not everybody can invest- some individuals are prevented from investing already.

      The big picture is that it helps the whole world when your job goes overseas, but that doesn't help those of us in America so affected. Here's what I suggest we do as a society if we wish to try to maintain our position as a global economic leader. We need to start providing cheap access to high quality education in America by spending a crapload of money on it as a society. Improve our schools by paying teachers more and at the same time making it easier to fire them when they stink. The benefits to us as a society would be enormous, economically, politically, and socially.

      That would help- but it's not going to happen, because the CEOs and the Stock Market are hordeing money away from this purpose.

      The Chinese and the Indians get it: education is where it's at. They laud their scientists and encourage their children to study hard. We make fun of ours and spend our time watching TV and worshipping the Britney Spears' of the world. It's just a matter of time before we start getting into trouble. If we don't get educated, we'll be making shoes for the Chinese pretty soon, metaphorically speaking.

      Actually, that's only one of three possibilities.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    19. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If wages in America go down, then the cost of living in America will go down. Taking globalisation to its natural conclusion, eventually wages and costs of living across the world will equalise, and it'll be a level playing field.

      Ah, yes, the Cobert Report Solution- turn the United States into a third world country so that the multinationals can exploit us as well.

      Closing your borders and trying to prop up an artificial gradient of wages and costs of living is just delaying the inevitable.

      Depends how many nukes you use to do it. After all, nobody said protectionism had to be PEACEFULL.

      And if I hear one more person earning 70k cry poverty, I really am going to start shooting people.

      I never got close to 70k- was earning 52k 7 years ago and am earning 32k today. Needless to say, since I have a family and bought a house, housing is now 75% of my take home pay.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    20. Re:Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Of course, what's to stop Chinese virus writers attacking American IP blocks?

      Absolutely nothing, which is why non-firewalled cross-border routers are a really bad idea.

      Or to stop China invading America?

      Nothing, because they already are- just look at who made 20 random products at Wal*Mart. There's no difference between an economic invasion and a military one, except the fact that the former is easier given our lack of defenses in that arena.

      Unless you think that the fat, lazy, arrogant redneck American population can cope with the huge, highly-trained Chinese Army.

      Actually I do- mechanized armies in the last 150 years have done very badly against armed civilian populations. After all, we're losing Iraq due to that.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  20. In other news... by vrtladept · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Sky is Blue!

    Water is Wet!

    Companies are about making money!

  21. This is not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is Flaimbait!

  22. So from my pay... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I'm a foreign national working on an H1B. I mean, at the pay I get versus what all the pundits, reports, studies, and "in the know" people say I should be getting, I must be.

    Hey, wake up, pay sucks everywhere. Even for those born here. Consequence of the extended hangover from that double bubble burst...

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  23. Pope found to be Catholic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Film at 11. Also, stunning new evidence that bears crap in the woods.

  24. Lesser evils by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you want those people paid 20k less here, where they will spend some of it on cars, food, etc, or do you want them paid 40k less in India/China? It sucks, but about the only thing that stops this race to the bottom is us being better.

    We need to invest in schools and teach our kids skills (like how to reason). It's the only realistic way to prevent sliding into mediocrity.

    1. Re:Lesser evils by Wansu · · Score: 1


        It sucks, but about the only thing that stops this race to the bottom is us being better.

      No. The only thing that stops this race to the bottom is arrival at the bottom.
       

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    2. Re:Lesser evils by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      US Natives are spoiled. That's the bottom line. The problem is that people think that a degree makes you worth more as an employee. Anything past an associates degree (or at most bachelors) is completely unnecessary, and only makes you're value artifically inflated. This is proven by the fact that companies are willing to rush the H1B workers through school, and are perfectly happy with their output. The winners will shine with or without masters and phd's.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:Lesser evils by emidln · · Score: 1

      Well, no. Actually, the exact opposite should happen if you want to increase employment and stop this. For management to choose American worker then American workers must utimately be cheaper for them than non-American workers. One way to be cheaper would be to provide more value. Another way would be to stifle learning enough to create poverty, desperation, and an acceptance of working for less. Of course, this only works so well and leads up to nasty things like what happened in America at the turn of the 19th century, but it would likely work.

      Or cause a revolution, but that would set us back further. /In history, economies rise and fall. Accept it.

    4. Re:Lesser evils by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      We need to invest in schools and teach our kids skills (like how to reason). It's the only realistic way to prevent sliding into mediocrity.

      Reason would only dictate that there is no reason to have reason if your job is given to a foreigner living here or there.

      Reason would lead one to believe that the better job is the PHB who manages or supervises the foreign help. Give the 60-80 hour workweek to the foreigner and play more golf. That is a win-win situation for everybody.

    5. Re:Lesser evils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      let me guess .. you floated through college to receive an Associates degree.

    6. Re:Lesser evils by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you want those people paid 20k less here, where they will spend some of it on cars, food, etc, or do you want them paid 40k less in India/China?

      An Indian acquaintance (who is a semi-powerful businessman back in India) says that outsourcing was the direct result of reducing H1B visas several years back.

      In most instances, Indians rather immigrate, but with a visa shortage they were contented to be paid significantly less and remain in India. His point was that the US shot itself in the foot, and is about to get the pooch screwed raw because of a slight anti-immigration bias at this time.

      From the context of economy and taxation, it's far preferable to have them working in the US paying taxes and buying things than in India contributing little to the US economy.

      On the other hand, India has a goal of being a 1st world nation in 20 years, and the US government's restriction on H1B's will have a major role to play in that.

    7. Re:Lesser evils by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "and only makes you're value artifically inflated."


      Well, we know you slept through English class. Or "How to use a spell checker in an era of instant information access and essentially free computing power"-101.

    8. Re:Lesser evils by gnuLNX · · Score: 1

      Spoken by someone who most likley did not attend college. How can you say that anything past a 2 year degree is overkill? Or a 4 year for that matter? Did it ever cross your mind that some things take much longer to learn and master? I guess you must believe that a bunch of people with a 2 year college degree could put a man on the moon? Seriously get a grip and perhaps a clue will find you.

      Oh and yes most people do believe tha a college degree will grant the the ability to make more money...that is why most people go. yeah people will say that that isn't the reason you should go to collge...bullshit. Sure study what you love but you should be paid better than the average joe who refused to ever master anything.

      --
      what?
    9. Re:Lesser evils by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      In most instances, Indians rather immigrate, but with a visa shortage they were contented to be paid significantly less and remain in India. His point was that the US shot itself in the foot, and is about to get the pooch screwed raw because of a slight anti-immigration bias at this time.

      What's H1-B got to do with immigration? H1B is a temporary work visa.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:Lesser evils by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      Because most H1B holders plan to apply for green card or even become American citizens eventually?

    11. Re:Lesser evils by ashayh · · Score: 1

      For a lot of Indians, H1B is the first step to immigration. Once you have seen the difference between the first world and the third, few would want to go back. Once you get the H1, you can work nin the US for 3+ years. In that time you apply for the green card. As you might know, the GC gives almost all rights that citizenship does. That means once you get the GC you are set.

    12. Re:Lesser evils by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I find foreign workers to be more obsessed with degrees than US-born workers. I think it has to do with bragging rights, for the family, whereas in the US, intellectualism is frowned upon. How many times have you heard, "oh, so you're one of them tech geeks"? That being said, I agree that degrees are pretty much just pieces of paper. College may have been fun, but I think I'd be much better off now if I skipped it.

  25. H-1B is the first step to a green card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be very curious to see what these statistics would be if they included what might be termed "H-1B alumni" - people that originally came to the US under an H-1B but have since got a green card. I'd suspect that the results may be more even.

    For many immigrants, particularly skilled immigrants, H-1B is merely a first step to getting a green card. As such, of course they are going to make less because they snapshot a group of people early in their career and compare their salaries against "home grown" IT workers as a whole.

    Of course, this isn't to deny that the H-1B program needs fixing and that there havn't been abuses. Even if H-1B is this sort of first step in practice, that is not what the program was "intended" to do. But it is in the US's interest to keep on cherrypicking the best talent in the world, for there will eventually be a time when that will stop. Or worse, the brain drain that currently works in the US's favor may reverse course.

  26. It's an investment into your future by Yurka · · Score: 1

    So? Supply and demand, they call it. For many, this is the only way they can legally migrate into this country. I am not any good at working with anything except my head. Where I come from, this wouldn't have provided me with anything except a deadest of the dead end research jobs (I'm a physicist by trade). When I was hired at my first software engineer position for the company which agreed to sponsor the adjustment from visitor visa to H1B, I was getting 25K (granted, it was more than 10 years ago), and I wasn't complaining.

    --
    I can assure you, the best way to get rid of dragons is to have one of your own.
    1. Re:It's an investment into your future by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody want to migrate to the land of high housing prices and slavery to Wal*Mart?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:It's an investment into your future by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      10 years ago, the average starting salary for a programmer coming out of college was $36000.
      Of course, you were a software engineer. That tends to pay more.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  27. subject by akhomerun · · Score: 1

    i personally think that if there was some type of law that effectively required the salary of the worker + worker's visa sponsorship = salary of U.S. Citizen, it would force companies to choose their workers based on skill, giving skilled foreigners a chance for high paying work, and it would allow U.S. and foreign workers to compete on an equal level, so that could end the job "stealing".

    on an offtopic note, to reduce outsourcing, the government could establish some type of tax on products made by American companies using foreign labor.

    or maybe i'm just thinking too idealistically.

    1. Re:subject by TheDracle · · Score: 1

      I think this is an illustration of the need for multinational labor unions, tariffs and taxes are only regional and limited (and prohibited by the WTO and NAFTA). I think it's foolish to pretend that human beings in India are any less talented, skilled, or possessing of all of those qualities we so often celebrate in humanity, than those in the United States. I continually hear the argument that workers in India are the enemies of the workers in the United States. When will people realize that our goals are in common? The differences in the economies of the United States, and India, allow for companies to exploit foreign workers by playing these economies against one another on an international scale.

      India is no more immune to their jobs being transfered to China, or Russia, than we were to our jobs being transfered to India. And when India is once again significantly impoverished enough that their skilled population is again willing to accept marginalized salaries--- they will transfer their workforce back, until the lips of their Chinese workers are significantly parched enough to accept even lesser wages.

      This situation is analogous to the fights, and races to the bottom, that occurred in the United States in regards to the influx of cheap immigrant labor, time and time again. It wasn't until we realized our common interests, and forged strong unions, that it became a fight back up to the top again. If Indian workers were to demand certain working conditions be met in the United States, and U.S. workers were to demand the same for Indian workers, we would be able to secure a great deal more of the profits that multinational corporations are usurping from our talents. It seems we even have a great organizing utility, that I think all computer scientists are familiar with: The Internet.

    2. Re:subject by Tsunayoshi · · Score: 1

      That probably would not have quite the effect you think. Most likely all of the fees a company pays to imigrate an H1-B are written off as operating expenses for tax purposes, and the payroll taxes the company pays would be less than for the H1-B worker because his actual reported salary would still be lower than that of an American worker.

      --
      "Get a bicycle. You will not regret it, if you live." - Mark Twain, "Taming the Bicycle"
  28. More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did John Miano get paid to do this study?

    Other reports by John include: "The water is dry fallacy" and "The sky is red conspiracy".

  29. As an H1-B worker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am currently in the US on an H1-B (married to a US citizen, so on track for a green card) and so a little about this process... albeit for a non-tech (university professor) job.

    The H1-B rules state that an employer has to pay prevailing wages/salary for a position, precisely so that H1-B is not used as a way of undercutting the local job market. The application has to go by the State Employment Services Agency to verify the prevailing wage. Also, a company has to post notices regarding H1-B hires that mention salary details.

    1. Re:As an H1-B worker... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Not since 2004- and that law was only for the "additional" 100,000 visas/year. Even back then the Programmer's Guild, WashTech, ORTech, and other such groups had spreadsheets proving massive fraud in the system and a major lack of enforcement.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:As an H1-B worker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. I had to go through that process when I switched from a J-1 to H1-B in 2002 and when hired as an H1-B in 2003. And my employment category is one of those that doesn't fall under the H1-B quota, so it's nothing to do with any of the additional visas.

      Notice that I said nothing about how strictly this regulation is enforced, but I can tell you that it is there.

    3. Re:As an H1-B worker... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      nope. I had to go through that process when I switched from a J-1 to H1-B in 2002 and when hired as an H1-B in 2003. And my employment category is one of those that doesn't fall under the H1-B quota, so it's nothing to do with any of the additional visas.

      Yes, but it was the law allowing the additional visas that required the extra paperwork- that's all been gone since the begining of FFY 2005.

      Notice that I said nothing about how strictly this regulation is enforced, but I can tell you that it is there.

      Not at all as near as I can tell- I've only known one company punished for breaking the rules, and the only rule they were punished for was not checking the "H-1b dependant" box when 99% of their employees were H-1bs (and they were actively interviewing Americans, but never hiring them). And even they were only fined $1000/employee- a piddling amount.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  30. H-1B = tech slavery by olddotter · · Score: 2

    I don't think anyone reading slashdot is surprised by this. Companies use H-1B people as the closest legal thing to indentured servants.

    The companies do generally pay the legal fees for said person to get a green card. So while the time as H-1B is "bad" compared to being a citizen or green carded, most of them feel it is worth it for the green card. After all the INS listens to high paid corporate lawyers much better than to the poor immigrant. (Or maybe the lawyers just know how to work the system better.)

    1. Re:H-1B = tech slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. Most H1-B workers are substantially better treated and paid than the lawyers or more often paralegals handling their cases. Immigration law is one of the worst fields to practice in. Its seasonal so every summer brings steep quotas followed by lots of firing. I worked one summer in a fairly reputable firm where staff attorneys were paid $15/hr to write specialty green card and visa applications. Every week the slowest person got fired and the reward for lasting a whole year was also to get fired. The high paid part somewhat applied as the typical billing rate was $250/hr although most business was done on a transactional basis. Admittedly this is pretty off-topic, but it something that most people don't know about.

    2. Re:H-1B = tech slavery by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you bring this up.

      Most law firms in America handle business of people/corps worth more than them.

      You've got solo family lawyers making $30-50k a year representing $300k VP's.

      You've got $800 million BIGLAW firms representing $30 billion companies.

      Basically everything but legal aid/public defender jobs fall into the category of "lawyers/paralegals making less than their clients."

  31. Sweet, my job is safe! by Frangible · · Score: 1

    I can rest assured now knowing that my job is safe-- I make less than a H1B visa employee.

    1. Re:Sweet, my job is safe! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Uh, you're job isn't TRUELY safe until you make less than the average Chinese prison laborer... can you survive on half a bowl of rice a day?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Sweet, my job is safe! by Frangible · · Score: 1

      Less than that actually, I've got ample fat stores to see me through any starvation crisis.

    3. Re:Sweet, my job is safe! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > can you survive on half a bowl of rice a day?

      Given the obesity of the average programmer, they'd probably survive longer on a half bowl of rice a day...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  32. No skill? by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    Saying that these H-1B visas have no skill is a bit stretching it. Even for California 53K is a lot to pay for an unskilled worker.

  33. Not only that. by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    I'll bet he doesn't have to pay any benifits to them at all.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  34. System or people? by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this really caused by the industry, or by the H1b workers themselves? I think many H1b workers are less aggressive in increasing their salaries than native Americans (not a reference to First Nations). Some of the impediments that kept H1b workers in their places afraid to lose their jobs were removed years ago. The main one of these being the ability to switch jobs immediately and then apply for a new H1b with the new employer. I've been an H1b and was earning more than the average in the TFA back in 2000 in Colorado. Part of the reason I had a good salary was due to a work colleagues going and demanding (without my knowledge) that I have a higher salary. My cultural background hadn't prepared me to fight for my salary in this way, which is required in the US. On top of that, I was much more forthcoming and stubborn about my salary than many of my other H1b work colleagues from other cultures.

    Some might argue that the industry is taking advantage of H1b worker's cultures to keep their salaries low. I think it's more the other way around. This subject seems to garner quite a lot of hysteria and sensationalism and is a very good tool for politicians and certain media companies who claim to report news to further their own agendas.

    BTW, I'm no longer an H1b. I moved to Canada, a country that is more accepting of immigrants.

    1. Re:System or people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      System.
      Every H1-B I have met (several dozen) is applying for permanent U.S. Citizenship.
      This appears to take three to seven years.
      I am told that if the company writing your paycheck changes, your citizenship application has to restart at the beginning.

      So, nobody is willing to risk having to change jobs, because not only might you end up having to leave the country if something doesn't work out, even if it goes smoothly you've just pushed your citizenship back by however long you have been here already.

      It seems to lead to indentured servants who don't want to draw any attention to themselves. No wonder companies like the program.

    2. Re:System or people? by mwtube · · Score: 1

      Similar for me. From 2001 until 2004 I worked on an H1-B on the east coast managing a team of presales engineers (all US citizens) and clearly earned a good salary. End of 2004 I decided to move back to Europe and proceed my career back home. That I didn't want to become a resident in the US surprised most if not all my collegues in the US. The big issue IMHO with H1-B's are that people tend to apply for a green card while in the US and, often actually succeed. One has to know that a requirement to get an H1-B in the first place, is to declare that one wants to go home after the temporary assignment. Thats what I always wanted and also did.

    3. Re:System or people? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your last couple of sentances mean. It's perfectly legitmate to enter the US with dual intent (US Immigration terminology): i.e. enter the US on a temporary non-immigrant visa like an H1b, with the intent of also converting to permanent residence and becoming an immigrant (e.g. green card, and later citizenship).

      It's funny how people react when they discover that you have no intention of making a permanent life in the US. It's almost as if you've hurt their feelings! Oh well, I've had some good adventures in my life from living several different countries, but I can see how that might not appeal to everyone.

    4. Re:System or people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is more accepting - if you're young, speak fluent English, or have a degree from a recognized university (of which most eastern European ones are not). I'm lucky because I grew up for the most part in Canada, but I saw how my parents struggled through and the kind of shit they went through to find work (any work, not even work that related to their field). Not to mention that we recieved no compensation for a death in the family because my father died one year before the minimum needed.

      I love Canada, but it certainly has its flaws when it comes to immigration policy.

  35. Slightly incorrect research. by Axe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Data on the public disclosure site lists salaries for H1B workers at the moment they were hired. On average that would be unvervalued by about 4 to 5 years of raises - when most of H1B were hired.

    Other issue is that it does not compare apples to apples: most H1b are non-managerial positions with relatively low experience, while national average includes middle managers. One need to compare H1B to the people in the same position.

    And it looks like reducing numbers of H1Bs does wonders to the IT jobs retention in U.S. indeed. Not.

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    1. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

      "One need to compare H1B to the people in the same position."

      That's precisely what the study attempted to do.

      Taking everything you say into account, the study still found that the H1B's as a group occupy the bottom of the pay scale.

      And lets assume the study was wrong and you're right... if companies are unwilling to hire local talent for entry level positions, then where will the skilled, experienced talent come from in 10 years? When those H1B's are done, they go home, and we're left with little except cheap wages for a few years. The valuable commodity here is the experience, not the fact that HP et al saved a few million this year.

      Companies are bottom line oriented for this quarter; that doesn't mean congress has to help them.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    2. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data on the public disclosure site lists salaries for H1B workers at the moment they were hired.

      That explains why the difference as this headline smacks of sensationalism at its worst. H1B workers get their wages posted when hired with their skill sets. Any local can apply, but often the local really doesn't have the skill set is more the truth - and BS resume gets cut apart real quickly.

      And it looks like reducing numbers of H1Bs does wonders to the IT jobs retention in U.S. indeed. Not.

      Your right, they go off shore. Businesses have 2 choices, either hire someone locally that calls themselves "Senior" which is really a Junior in training quality with a no learn attitude or have the world as your market and perhaps get someone who is really qualified.

      And when I say qualified, I mean has the real skills. I interviewed someone the other week that had no less than 8 (well known) certs and 6 years experience. When questioned it immediately became apparent they were a caffeine driven, puke learning cert happy hype jive turkey.

      No one talks about another subject of why I/T goes off shore. North American I/T management is generally deficient in managing its people. It is also why many outsource, even when not going off shore as their business have a management and vision problem that often extends even beyond I/T as they do not have a good management discipline.

      I am going to post anonymously as not to get pegged with hate posts.

    3. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by Axe · · Score: 1
      That's precisely what the study attempted to do.

      And my point was it failed: as it was 1) not done by an independent party 2) the is NO public data about CURRENT salaries of H1B holders available, as I pointed out.

      But this study aside: From what I see H1B do not bring any cost savings, after all other costs are taken into account (I am not talking about sweat shops of old that became less relevant since H1B folks are able to change jobs nowdays with relative ease). They really compete against outsourcing, not against our native employees.

      Same reason universities bring in foreign grad students and pay them scholarship. Growth and quality creates jobs, not protectionism.

      I am all for ensuring that H1B holders and green card applicants are indeed very good professionals. But it should be made easier, not harder, to bring them onboard.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    4. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by AltaMannen · · Score: 1

      But saying that the H1B employees are less skilled purely because their salaries are lower is not correct, the H1B employees probably come from countries with far lower average salaries for engieneers than the US, such as every other country in the world. There are prevalent minumum salaries set for the H1B crowd that is set by the government to protect the US workforce so why then are these minimum salaries so low?

    5. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by EireannX · · Score: 1

      Other issue is that it does not compare apples to apples: most H1b are non-managerial positions with relatively low experience, while national average includes middle managers. One need to compare H1B to the people in the same position

      You are so right he didn't compare apples to apples. The H1-B positions were mostly for programmer-analysts while the national average he used for local workers was 'programmer' because it was the lesser paid of the 'programmer' and 'analyst' classifications. So he weighted the statistic in favour of the H1-Bs and they still ended up getting less on average. Of course you would know that if you had read the article and didn't have the attention span of a poodle.

      And 'manager' would be a different job classification again.

    6. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by Axe · · Score: 1

      If you have had a shred of brain, you would have understood the errors in the article. I am not going to waste my time on you any further.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    7. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong here. Having seen the draft of the report, this is probably the first report to do an actual apples to apples comparison of wages. The report took the disclosure data and broke it down by occupation and compared those figures occupation by occupation and location by location to U.S. wages. The national averages compared to H-1B do not include managers. The jobs titles compared are PROGRAMMER, SYSTEMS ANALYST, COMPUTER SCIENTIST, "SOFTWARE ENGINEER". The BLS puts managers in separate categories.

      Previous studies, including the Atlanta Federal Reserve (which found H-1B does not depress wages but causes unemployment) and the recent GAO study have lumped all "computer workers" (which includes managers) together.

      Particularlly interesting in this report is the by employer breakdown. For example, you find that a few companies (e.g. Apple) actually pay their H-1B workers quite well while at others (e.g. Microsoft) the wages are quite so-so and at others (e.g. Oracle) H-1B wages are dreadfully low.

    8. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most H1B employees never get raises, or only correction for inflation.
      The difference in salary mentioned also doesn't take into account lesser benefits like health insurance, company cars, pension funds, etc. etc.

      As many H1B employees are hired through 3rd party body shops who nominally employ them, in effect they get even less.

      The game is simple:
      Company A is a body shop. They hire an Indian or Pakistani for $35.000 a year, no pension or health insurance and no company car. You're hired as an independent with company A only providing "services" (read, they stamp your paperwork).
      Company B is their customer, they contract company A to supply a programmer and pay $50.000 a year for that.

      According to labour statistics the programmer on that H1B visum now is listed as making $50.000 a year and working as an independent contractor. The $15.000 a year that goes to the "intermediary" is seen as a business expense for the independent programmer.
      That "independent" contractor is now hired for a fixed rate, non-negotiable, for a maximum time of 5 years (customer can cancel at any time with 1 week notice).

      the salaries listed for US workers are for programmers as well, don't take management scales into account.

    9. Re:Slightly incorrect research. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      Other issue is that it does not compare apples to apples: most H1b are non-managerial positions with relatively low experience, while national average includes middle managers.

      Except that the study compared both groups (H1B and non-H1B) with positions that seemed to be in the programmer role, not a management role. In fact, they compared all of the H1Bs that were either programmers or analysts as though they were merely programmers, to be as fair as possible. Or did I misunderstand the article??

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  36. H1B is the new age slavetrade. Shame on the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B is truly the new age slavetrade. These people are paid less than their peers, even though they have similar cost of living. They have to pay social security, even though the US govt. wants them to leave after few years of working. They can't change companies, and it is very normal for companies to overwork and overextend these employees. This is bonded labour. I know someone who left a good job in India, to work in the US on H1B. After almost 5-6 years, with a masters degree and good experience, he is still insecure beacuse of his status.

    Anyone who steps foot on America is an American. If you are not willing to apply this definition, then the only Americans should be the native indians. The west europeans who colonized america initially, from which ALL of the present caucasian (white) americans descend, if they are americans, then so is the H1B visa holder who steps foot on america (and who isn't killing the natives) is an American, and deserves equal rights and protections.

    Either do that or scrap this program altogether. H1B is still better for these people compared to their opportunities in India, but it is a glorified slavetrade.
    Stuff like this makes me angry at the US.

    1. Re:H1B is the new age slavetrade. Shame on the US. by goofballs · · Score: 1

      H1B is truly the new age slavetrade.

      please, that kind of rhetoric isn't going to buy you any supporters. $73k, even in overpriced california, is hardly chump change, and a far cry from slavery.
    2. Re:H1B is the new age slavetrade. Shame on the US. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you get passed over for promotion, year after year, because your job description cannot change until you get your Greencard (which is in backlog for Labor Certification for 5 years with no hope in hell of seeing daylight)... Canada or New Zealand start sounding much more like civilized 1st world destinations that the US of A. And anyday now, the President's SS troops may kick in my door and send me home... nice "Land of the Free" you have here. Apart form the First Nations, everybody is actually an immigrant. Hello?!?!?! Treat people right in accordance with your rhetoric America, or shut up!
          ~Fed Up

  37. ask them how they feel by spoonyfork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ask the H1Bs in the US how they feel about their jobs being taken away by the B and C list programmers back home in Bangalore. Imagine working your ass off to come over here for the opportunity only to have the guy from your CIS101 class who thought HTML was a programming language steal your job. Global economies are teh suck.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:ask them how they feel by Surt · · Score: 1

      The real nightmare is realizing that your job can be done by a b or c list programmer. After all, if it couldn't, the company in question would have to come crawling back to you after their failed offshoring experiment.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:ask them how they feel by HampiRocks · · Score: 1

      It is wrong to presume that the programmers in Bangalore are B and C grade programmers. Many good Indian programmers stay back home.

    3. Re:ask them how they feel by spoonyfork · · Score: 1

      It is wrong to presume that the programmers in Bangalore, Chennai, and where ever are A list programmers. Frankly it doesn't matter. The joke is H1Bs here are losing jobs to their country(wo)men back home. I know for a fact this chaps some of their asses. The ironical [sic] thing is that quality has never been a included in all strategery [sic] statements I've read about offshoring programming jobs including those of my own company and related companies in my business field. Wage equalization trafficked on teh internets [sic] will bite the A list programmers regardless of whether they'll eat a hamburger in whatever timezone they're in.

      --
      Speak truth to power.
  38. Re:Dude, it costs a lot to even HIRE them by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    A lot less than it used to- used to be $1600 just in filing fees, but that got slashed to $500 for FFY 2005. But it certainly doesn't account for a $13,000/year difference- especially when you figure that processing only comes around once every three years per worker.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  39. Arrogance by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Funny
    I think the greater problem is with American arrogance. I think it is an eye opener for us to see that, no you dont need 90K to survive and have a great life. It is the American dream to look down on the rest of the world or your neighbor so that you can feel better yourself. So what you have to buy last year's model of sports car, or your home only costs half a million dollars. There are worse things to happen.

    We think just because we are American that that entitles us to higher pay than the rest of the world. If we werent so arrogant we wouldnt see the outsourcing of jobs we do. Accept the fact that 53K is a good wage and anyone can live quite happily on that amount.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:Arrogance by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I think it is an eye opener for us to see that, no you dont need 90K to survive and have a great life.

      Yes you do. If you live in San Francisco or Silly Valley, then 90k is the going rate. You need that to pay rent and groceries.

      We think just because we are American that that entitles us to higher pay than the rest of the world.

      We have a higher cost of living so, yes, we need more money to maintain our lifestyle. I see no reason to live like someone in the 3rd world just to assuage your guilt.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Arrogance by Elfboy · · Score: 1

      hmmmm...try living on 53K pre-tax a year in SF, Boston or NY

      $DEITY help you if you have a family even....

      buying a home on that?!?!? bwhahah. nice dream.

      --
      * We dance where angels fear to tread *
    3. Re:Arrogance by sdamberger · · Score: 1

      Sure $53K is nice, but considering that most programmer/high tech people live in places with a high cost of living, it isn't acutally that much. Factor in housing, commuting, divorces, taxes and retirement and you end up just getting by. Add an emergency and boom...

    4. Re:Arrogance by nazzdeq · · Score: 1

      53k is ok if you live at home with your parents. In California, 86% of the population cannot afford a home of any kind. In Orange county, a 2 bedroom townhome of 1500 sq/ft cost 800+k brand new. Less than 500k will land you right in the middle of the hood. 53k will ensure your kids go to shitty schools, wear crappy clothes, and you'll be in an apt. for the rest of your life out here. That might be fine in other countries or for people who don't care, but that's not what America is all about.

    5. Re:Arrogance by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      We'd like to get paid more in the US because things cost more.

      Living in Los Angeles, on an approximately $50k/year salary (not a programmer) barely pays for my 5 year old car (bought used) and insurance, my single room apartment, and my school loans.

      I barely scrape by as a single guy with no dependents. And you think that we're arrogant and just want to look down on other countries? I wouldn't mind making $25k in Thailand if it meant my expenses were only $10k. The difference between living expenses and salary in the US is much smaller than most outsourcing options. Thats why outsourcing is so cheap. Take what are highly-skilled people (by their local standards) and offer them an insanely good pay (again by their local standards) and it still is substantially less than the US employee who is a lot closer to scraping by (propotionately).

      Now, take those same outsourced people, offer them a job in the US, that is even higher in pay, and costs you more (but you get them here instead of dealing with international communications) and they will jump at the chance. And you still get it cheaper than the US worker who isn't heading home seasonally to spend his earnings where the dollar can buy much more.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    6. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out your calculator. Pretend you live in the Bay Area, California.

          $53,000
      - 18,550 (federal taxes)
            34,450
      - 3,100 (state taxes)
            31,350
      - 12,000 ($1000/mo apartment; yes, that's the going rate here)
            19,350
      - 1,400 (car insurance for a small non-sports sedan)
            17,950
      - 1,730 (15k miles of gas at 26 mpg. $3.00/gal)
            16,220
      - 1,500 (your vacation)
            14,720
      - 3,000 (food)
            11,720
      - 1,800 (utility and cable bills)
              9,920
      - 3,500 (IRA)
              6,420
      - 4,800 ($400/mo car payments)
              1,620

      That leaves $135/mo in "extra money." That may as well be nothing. $53,000 is NOT enough here. It would be a very comfortable income someplace like Blacksburg, Virginia (at least for the time being), but in most large cities, it's just getting by for a single middle-class worker.

      Remember, companies are only going to pay you enough to keep you from leaving (if you're a great employee). Otherwise, they'll let you go and take on some fresh meat who believes that $53k is a good salary. There's always a fresh stream of new suckers. Fight for your salary. Get another job if you're not making what you deserve.

    7. Re:Arrogance by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      You guys replying to my post choose to live where you do.

      Living in High risk areas, where you are slumming it if you kids are forced to shop at the Gap. The reason your 2 bedroom townhome costs so much is due to the same problem that gives you 90K a year.

      And dont forget most families are 2 income houses so you are looking at 180K a year for middle income.

      The problem is you could move in any direction west and cut your cost of living by 75%. Check out Oregon, Colorado, NY, and you will be fine, dont look for pity from me if you live in Atlanta or Southern CA.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    8. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      53K is a good wage and anyone can live quite happily on that amount.


      Interesting theory.

      Here is my perspective.

      I'm 24, with a CS bachelors from DePaul university in Chicago, IL. I was really lucky and grants covered most of my tuition, so i ended up with a reasonable 17 thousand in loans. Graduated, job searched, ended upbworking a year at an ISP "Just for Experience"TM, as a on-the-road tech doing T1 installs and support. I then moved up to working for one of the ISP's clients as a full time Administrator/Programmer/Tech Support/Electrician. I started at $42,000 a year in salary - before taxes. No fancy bonus at the end of the year. I've been here a year and a half - i'm still at $42000 a year and no raises to be expected. I've converted their whole infrastructure from Windows based services to Unix, moved all outsourced projects in-house and got rid of all unneccessary subcontractors. Based on my last calculated numbers they are saving on average of over a quarter million each year.

      Great job; I pat myself on the back. So does my boss with his fake smile. What's really going on in his mind is: "Thanks a lot buddy, i'm getting a 15% raise this year. Keep up the good work."

      In the mean time, i had to buy a car, because the old beater died. That's 20 grand. Job requires a phone, but the employer won't pay for it. I have to drive 25 miles one way to get to work. I fill up at least 3 times a week for at least 40 dollars every time. I have a 10000 dolar credit card bill. I have to pay for electricity, water and gas, my internet connection and 500 dolars in rent. (I still live at home mind you).

      I get 2400 a month after taxes and end up spending 2000 on bills, just to live day to day.

      $90 grand is a lavish lifestyle? I think that is just getting into the middle class.

      I consider myself at minimum wage right now, and don't tell me i'm not cause it sure as hell feels like it. Also don't tell me i should get something cheaper. I'm 6'4" and i am NOT geting a chevy Aveo. Total up all those minimum requirement items + my school loans, i'll be paying everything off a very long time at a wage of $42 grand a year.

      At the current minimum wage in the US i don't think i could afford a cardboard box, much less an apartment + utilities + a decent car to get to the minimum wage slavery facility.

      I wanted to go back to school to get my masters - sure, if i win the damm lottery.
    9. Re:Arrogance by rabun_bike · · Score: 1

      I would at least like to be paid a fair market value. That means I don't want to have folks shipped in from foreign countries competing against me for the same jobs in my country where I have paid the taxes and I am a citizen. I think that is a very basic requisit. I have no problem with outsourcing because a company takes a risk by going to a foreign market and buying services. But, they mitigate that risk by bringing the cheap foreign human labor to my country. I can compete against outsourcing by working faster and smarter. I can't compete very well against some dude who lives in a apartment with 5 other dudes and is willing to work for 60% of my salary. Besides, the brain drain doesn't help the foreign counties. We suck the working people out of their markets. Their market economies suffer so US companies can mitigate risk and get cheap labor.

    10. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accept the fact that 53K is a good wage and anyone can live quite happily on that amount.

      This totally depends on where you live. I challange you to live above poverty level at that salary while living in Washington DC or any other place where a college dorm sized 1 bedroom apartment in a shitty part of town is $2000+ a month.

      On the other hand 53k/yr in BFE, SD where you are and you could live like a king.

      Ignorance is bliss, eh?

      The problem is freakin inflation. Everybody wants to charge more for everything which snowballs causing everyone else to charge more for everything. This makes higher income peaks, but for less people. It's totally out of control. To a certain extent this is a natural effect of capatilism but the government is suppose to control that so it doesn't get out of hand (eg. unfair business practices; *cough* Microsoft) but the government is one of the worst offenders when it comes to corruption and wasting resources so it's all one big mess.

    11. Re:Arrogance by sdamberger · · Score: 1

      I do live in Colorado and I don't shop at the Gap and we only have one income and live in a condo in a less expensive area. I can't imagine trying to get by with 53K in the Bay.

    12. Re:Arrogance by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      If you live in San Francisco or Silly Valley, then 90k is the going rate. You need that to pay rent and groceries.

      No you don't. I made $75K when I started in the Valley in 1999, and rents have gone down substantially since then. Right now I own a home. If I were renting instead, I would 'need' maybe $65K year, much less if I cut back on non-essential spending.

    13. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no you dont need 90K to survive and have a great life.
      To be fair, they're talking about California, where $90k won't even pay for a year's worth of mortgage/rent. If you only make $90k/yr in California, you have to get a second job as a convenience store clerk to pick up another $75k/yr, selling Slurpees for $20 apiece.
    14. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You guys replying to my post choose to live where you do.


      Really? Well i'll be. Hell. Hey everybody, let's just pack it up move 3 states over and be done with it. And i mean everybody, just move out to Oregon or South Carolina and problem solved, right? Right?

      Maybe people like living where they are and more importantly not everybody wants to or can move someplace else.

      Don't blame the people for wanting to live - blame the corporations for sucking the life right out of you.

    15. Re:Arrogance by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly, you get it. It's all about "where" you live. If you want to live in the tech or media centers of the US (I, not a programmer, pretty much have to live in LA because of the industry I'm in), its going to cost you a lot more to live.

      Companies in LA need programmers. Companies in San Francisco need programmers. If they want to hire people to work there, they need to pay them appropriately for where they are living.

      Sure, its cheaper to live in New Mexico. And you won't get paid as much either. It's also cheaper to live in Thailand, you won't get paid as much either... Hence why H1-B workers, are willing to work for so much less. They are used to the cost of living and salaries of their home countries which are much lower.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    16. Re:Arrogance by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      You do seem to be wasting a lot of money on a car, when SF has quite cheap buses.

    17. Re:Arrogance by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Gosh, you're not being cynical, are you, now?

      The "American Dream" (which, I might add, shifts with every generation that re-invents it) seems to be most consistently based around doing better than your parents did.

      My great grandpa came from what's now Belarus to get out of forced conscription by the Czar. For him, the American Dream was about having a tailoring business and a place to build a house. He never learned much english, but he was very concerned that all his kids go to school at least through 8th grade so that they could get jobs and have families of their own.

      For my grandpa, the American Dream was about having a car and being able to feed his kids and get them through high school. He worked for 35 years for the UP railroad and was able to retire comfortably. He grew up in the depression, so "looking down" on people meant what you saw at eye level.

      For my dad, the American Dream was about running his own successful business and having me and my sister go to college and maybe grad school if we wanted, and to see that we had as many opportunities and choices as possible in terms of the lives we wanted to lead. Dad also liked to go 4-wheeling and take vacations to civil war battlefields. Not much looking down on people there, nope.

      As for me, my American Dream is one where I don't have to work for my entire life. I'd like to travel the world a little bit and learn a couple more languages before I die. I hope I don't get stuck behind a desk for the rest of my days -- I save money for that reason, not so that I can gleefully wave my IRA report in the face of my neighbors. I'm not going to have much time or resources for retirement if I'm only making 53K per annum, so aspiring to a higher salary is my way of getting what I want out of my life.

      I think that what entitles me to higher pay is my performance and expertise in a pretty obscure little corner of software development. I don't know many people that do what I do, or are as good at it as I am. Sure, I have peers, and their strengths don't necessarily match up 1:1 with mine, but that means we complement each other. Lately, I've been tapped for management, so my job is shifting in different areas and I have a lot to learn in those new contexts, but I was picked because I'm adaptable. We'll see how far I go. Is it looking down on others to see my career and compensation in that light -- maybe, but I'm also my worst critic -- there's a balance to strike.

      Whether you were just trying to be funny or not, I think there's this kind of hippy-dippy snobbishness that says "Americans are sooo, like materialistic and like capitalistic and, um, wasteful and hard on the environment. We should all just work at low paying jobs and use eco-friendly products and wear Guatemalan clothing because you just don't need money to be happy and have spiritual fulfillment, yunno." I think it's a fine point of view to have, but I think that people need to find their own path -- if having a nice new porsche every year really jazzes you to the max and that's what makes you aspire to a better job or a better salary, then great. If wanting a huge house to live in makes you feel comfortable and safe, then good on ye. To say that the American Dream is about looking down on people and engaging in conspicuous consumption is using a bit of a broad brush, methinks.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    18. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, SF does have quite cheap buses.

      I don't live in SF.

      I don't work there either.

      Are you not from around here or something?

    19. Re:Arrogance by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      And how much .. exactly .. does a college degree run now adays ?
      53k ? Thats great if your single without a family. Throw two kids in the mix, and what you get from that 53k after taxes is just about what it costs you to put them in daycare.

      I guess we could hire 11-b's for daycare to drive those costs down.

      I mean, the average worker in cuba brings home $12 usd a month.

      of course, everything is a lot cheaper in cuba too .. so .. its all relative.

      But I bet the guys that make $15 a month get laid a lot more, and buy a nicer used 1950's car.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    20. Re:Arrogance by Watts+Martin · · Score: 1

      90K is the going rate for *what* in the Silicon Valley, pray tell?

      I'm not trying to be flip here, but look, I live in San Jose. When I grab lunch at Quizno's, get groceries at Lunardi's, shop at Fry's or Best Buy or Rasputin Music, none of the people there, not even managers, are making 90K. Waiters, bus drivers, janitors, teachers, secretaries, file clerks.... Open your eyes and look around, dude: most of the people in Silicon Valley are not tech geeks struggling to get by on a mere $1500 a week. They are in positions making half that, or less. The median household, not individual, income in San Jose is $73K. (The income per capita is $24K.)

      Yet, all of these people actually do it. I can assure you they're not all commuting in here from Livermore, Salinas and Ukiah. And in point of reference, as a technical writer, I'll make about $60K this year myself... which is considerably more than I made the two years before that.

      No offense, but there are a lot of Valley area Slashdot posters, and this may well include you, who post comments to stories like this that show they have a very foggy grasp of what a livable wage in this area entails -- much less what "living like someone in the third world" entails. If you "need" $90K a year to pay for rent and groceries, you're living in one damn expensive rental unit even by area standards and/or feasting on aged prime beef, fine wine and caviar a bit too often.

    21. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for me, my American Dream is one where I don't have to work for my entire life.

      The problem is that you seem to be aiming to save up lots of money for retirement, when you'll do all the things you want to do before you die. But you'll be old then, and you'll have lived the best years of your life in a (possibly boring) management job.

      Okay; perhaps I'm being unduly pessimistic here, but I really think that this is a trap that people fall into. Shouldn't you be aiming for a job that doesn't actually feel like you're marking time in preparation for something better (the afterlife? :-O )

      I'm old enough to know that what I just said sounds a little idealistic. I'm also old enough to know that I don't intend wasting my life on something I hate; and that's accounting for that fact that I'll probably live for a lot longer than previous generations. On the other hand, YMMV; I'm the kind of guy who doesn't actually want a BMW, but if I did I wouldn't consider it worth the effort to gain enough money just to waste on an expensive car, and if I had it anyway I still wouldn't waste it on an expensive car, which is great because then I'd own a BMW, and I don't want a BMW. :)

      I think that last part went awry.

    22. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The problem is freakin inflation. .. To a certain extent this is a natural effect of capatilism but the government is suppose to control that so it doesn't get out of hand
      Uh, inflation as we currently know it, has nothing to do with capitalism. Inflation is caused by the government, not fought by the government. What they did, is essentially come up with a way to tax ownership of money. And as a side effect, they sneakily encourage people into holding more money (suckers!!), through artificially lowered interest rates.

      If you want the government to make inflation go down, start voting for presidents and congresscritters, who run on a platform of abolishing the federal reserve.

    23. Re:Arrogance by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that post. I think some of the problem a lot of these posters are having are related to budget management rather than not being paid enough.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    24. Re:Arrogance by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I would say he is wasting more money on insurance, wow, I pay around $50 a month for an Aurora and that is full coverage.

      $400 dollars for a car? if you would just buy that used sedan for 10K you would cut your payments by quite a bit. of course since many of you spend 2+ hours in your car commuting every day I can see wanting to look good. The commute is something I will never understand, I love the fact that it is 15 mins to my work everyday, makes the day better when I dont have to spend 2-3 hours in a car. You ever look at how much of you life is wasted in a car? Is living in your town really worth all this?

      $3000 for food? How many people are you feeding? I guess if you dont know how to cook and given that California restraunts charge an arm and leg for food (at least they did while I was out there) My wife and I (including eating out) never spend more than $200 in an expensive month.

      $1500 for your vacation? Now that would be a nice section of the budget, going to a resort once a year or abroad.

      Anyway, I have a calculator, now you go take a finacial planning class. Eventually you will have to learn to run a budget when you get older and need to get out of all the credit card debt you are piling on.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    25. Re:Arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of trying to advance our careers and salaries, we should:

      1. Go buy a used sedan instead of a modestly-priced new sedan,
      2. Stock the break room kitchen at work and cook lunch instead of eating lunch at local restaurants (we're not talking 4-stars, here),
      3. Instead of taking a vacation, take a couple of weeks off to hang out with your wife's parents an hour away?

      That's not financial planning, it's being a cheapskate. Financial planning should allow you to live a comfortable life and have enough money left to safe for the future. If I wanted to drive a 7-year-old Camry to work with a lunch box on the right seat, and spend my weekends counting beans, I wouldn't have majored in engineering. Engineers are the only big-P Professionals who have to put up with insultingly-low salaries and mass-layoffs. If we don't fight for higher salaries, the former business majors will be more than happy to continue paying what they are now.

  40. Oh wow, no kidding?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No kidding it's a swindle. That's the whole thing that pisses me off about it! I have no problem in general with some American losing their tech job in favor of some non-American gaining a tech job. What I have a problem with is that what really happens is an American loses their well paying tech job, some non-American gains a usually well paying job by their standards but still vastly less than what it replaced, and then the executives give themselves phat bonuses for saving money.

    They have no incentive to pay them well. As always, they will pay only the absolute minimum necessary to get someone to do the job, and yes considerations like "quality" are fortunate if they are considered at all like all non-bean-countable aspects of business. The result is more money concentrated in the hands of the few, fewer well-paying jobs for skilled people in this country, and oh yeah a little bit different distribution of what wealth remains. Gutting the American middle class for fun and profit!

    And if the ones getting those not-so-bad paying jobs in India think they aren't going to be next when the greedy whores realize that someone in China will work for a third of what the Indian does, well, they'd be exactly like we were not so long ago. :)

    I wish there was some reasonable way to cap the salary of executives to, say, 20x what their average employee makes, including outsourced/contracted work (which is part of what makes this seem impractical to me). Cap their bonuses and other compensation similarly. Then you'd stop seeing employers struggling to pay their employees less and less, they'd have an incentive to pay them more. Since they'd be paying more for employees, you might see them caring more about quality that they're getting for their money no matter where they are hiring from.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I wish there was some reasonable way to cap the salary of executives to, say, 20x what their average employee makes..

      There is a way. It's called "electing Democrats."

    2. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I buy that. What party is that senator Disney owns from again?

      Both parties are corporate whores because that's where their campaign money comes from, the only difference is how flagrant the handouts are and what distraction issues they prattle on about (gays! violent video games!) while they're passing out the loot to the corporations.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by SgtSnorkel · · Score: 1



      Yup, corps need to stop thinking of salaries as an expense to be minimized or eliminated.

      If you want to build a real company, be proud of the quality of your employees and the wages they make! Besides, the less you pay employees, the fewer cuatomers you have for your product.

    4. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by symbolic · · Score: 1

      I wish there was some reasonable way to cap the salary of executives to, say,

      There is. It's called outsourcing. Is there any legitimate reason that the functions of a CEO cannot be outsourced to someone else with equally viable knowledge of a certain industry, and who is equally capable of making sound business decisions? It would save companies millions of dollars in annual salaries and bonuses, and as an added benefit there might even be fewer ethical problems.

      There is nothing on the face of the earth that says the CEO of an American corporation has to be as highly-overpaid and self-important as they are now. Of course, my bet is that the first sign that the boards of Corporate America get wise to this, CEOs will be lobbying hard for laws to protect them.

      If I were India, the next area I'd be pushing is business education.

    5. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

      "I wish there was some reasonable way to cap the salary of executives"

      That's called communism.

    6. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, my bet is that the first sign that the boards of Corporate America get wise to this, CEOs will be lobbying hard for laws to protect them.

      I really hate to have to be the one to tell you this, but that's not going to happen.

      The Boards of Corporate America are also the CEOs of Corporate America. For example, the CEO of my corporation is also the Chairman of the Board, and he's also on the Board of Directors of another company. This is pretty typical. It's all a big incestuous network of corporate executives.

      So no, the Boards are never going to outsource executive positions because they would be outsourcing themselves. That's why CEO salaries keep going up, why bonuses keep going up, why golden parachutes have become standard, why driving a company into the ground doesn't seem to prevent a CEO from finding work at another company. Because the Boards that are making these decisions are executives themselves, or would like to be, and thus want the "industry standard" to be as high as possible.

      Consider also that between the lot of them, this incestuous net of directors/executives also owns a huge portion of the stock. The rest is mostly held by retirement funds, which are run by fund managers. None of these people are going to go along with the idea. The change we are looking for will not come from within the halls of corporate america.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by happyemoticon · · Score: 1
      The result is more money concentrated in the hands of the few, fewer well-paying jobs for skilled people in this country, and oh yeah a little bit different distribution of what wealth remains. Gutting the American middle class for fun and profit!

      I was talking to my mother-in-law the other day, who just inherited a million bucks. She was dirt-poor when she raised my girlfriend, and she's glad that now she still mourns the loss of 3 artichokes that went bad in the fridge. We were going on about these investment bankers who worked for Harvard, managing the company's endowment, who were pissed off that they were now capped at making a mere $25 million a year.

      In her experience, she said, the people who make $25m are mad as hell that they don't make $50m. They have only one mansion and staff instead of three. They have to share a private jet instead of owning their own private jet. These people have far more personal wealth than I will probably ever have, and yet they are obsessed with acquiring yet more.

      Another thing people are throwing around here a lot is "Shouldn't we realize that as American IT workers, we're getting paid too much, and should in fact get paid less?" Bullshit. I'll start thinking "Maybe I should look forward to renting forever, being in debt all my life, and not sending my children to college," when I see a couple of American execs display some shame and say, "Maybe I should buy a normal IKEA shower curtain, instead of this $40,000 one, and maybe I should settle for a normal desk instead of a hand-wrought one that costs my company 3 million bucks.

    8. Re:Oh wow, no kidding?! by symbolic · · Score: 1

      You make some good points. I'd forgotten how tainted the process is.

      I guess one of the only avenues left to affect change is what affects the bottom line: consumer spending. But that requires a bit of discipline, so nothing will happen there, either.

  41. Affirmative Action! by JustASlashDotGuy · · Score: 1

    Since from the American's perspective, there are more foreigners than there are domestic workers (North Americans). Should we be protected under affirmative action? I'm tired of all the foreign workers keeping us domestic workers down!

    Now, I'm not saying I'm willing to accept the same pay as those my job is going to, that's just crazy. They should pay me more because I'm a minority and I deserve it. Same pay for the same work only counts when it benefits me.

    1. Re:Affirmative Action! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack Thompson isn't the only one who has problems writing satire.

  42. Did anyone stop to think... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    That H1-B employees might also be less productive than US nationals? After all, most likely English would not be their native language and communications skills are important to quality productivity. Of course, if you're a die-hard marxist, everyone should be paid the same anyway...

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  43. Sigh. by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That means the largest concentration of H-1B workers make less than [the] highest 75 percent of the U.S. wage earners

    Yet, the oppressed foreigners keep taking advantage of the visas. Shame on the evil corporations for taking advantage of these poor people. To think, they could be spending more on their own countrymen and supporting their grossly disproportionate wages.

    Rather than say, "Hey, you're trying to pay less for programmers!" we should be saying "Hey, are we getting paid too much? Are we pricing ourselves out of positions?"

    Don't get me wrong. I've been a programmer for quite some time and it sucks, but supply and demand concepts aren't limited to one country. The world is getting smaller and more connected. National economies are merging into a world economy. No amount of artificial propping-up by local governments is going to keep it from happening. Get used to it.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Xarius · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. I've been a programmer for quite some time and it sucks

      I've worked retail, manufacturing, programming and in management.

      They all suck. Work sucks.

      I agree with you, most skilled workers don't, however, expect to get paid extreme amounts for knowing something most people don't.

      Programmers are just egotistical and think they're better than everyone else because they understand these fancy new computer things.

      --
      C17H21NO4
    2. Re:Sigh. by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Rather than say, "Hey, you're trying to pay less for programmers!" we should be saying "Hey, are we getting paid too much? Are we pricing ourselves out of positions?"

      I think you've hit the nail on the head. I know this won't be a popular position on Slashdot, but am I the only one who was shocked by the average salaries of the American and H1B workers listed in the article? As someone whose never made more than $20,000 a year in my life, I really find it hard to have a great deal of sympathy here.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    3. Re:Sigh. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      No amount of artificial propping-up by local governments is going to keep it from happening. Get used to it.

      I have gotten used to it. What bugs me about this brave new global economy is that the people who are telling me to smile and get used to the lower wages in our brave new global economy belong to the same coterie of blood sucking parasites that are also responsible for other wonderful aspects of our brave new global economy such as propping up artifical trade barriers to drive up the prices for various goods and services. Now if our brave new global economy would result in truly free trade in every way like, just for example.... free trade in food stuffs and an end to agricultural subsidies in the USA and EU which would result in a significant lowering of my grocery bill I would get even more used to our brave new global economy. Unfortunately that is not likely to happen since it would have a detrimental effect on the parasite population...

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    4. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BitterOak is a bit bitter?

    5. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But that's nonsense! Yes, globalization will have emerging countries getting paid more, and wages for 1st world nations getting paid less. That's rational. But that kind of balancing-out is only happening in the job market! Tuition prices are still rising, and I don't see the cost of living going down in my city. I'll stop demanding more money from my employer when my landlord, school, and government stop demanding more money from me.

    6. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is talking about the guys who write the software for the cash register you ring up our value meals on. Back to the fry-o-lator for you!

    7. Re:Sigh. by jrcamp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't get me wrong. I've been a programmer for quite some time and it sucks, but supply and demand concepts aren't limited to one country. The world is getting smaller and more connected. National economies are merging into a world economy. No amount of artificial propping-up by local governments is going to keep it from happening. Get used to it.

      I will not get used to it. There's a difference between competing in a free market and having your own government bring in non-US citizens to compete directly against you. Or giving tax breaks to coporations shipping jobs over to China.

      Should we expect any less of a Republican big business administration?

    8. Re:Sigh. by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      BitterOak is a bit bitter?

      Actually, I'm not, and that's basically my point. When I am working, I feel damn lucky to have a job, and I've never complained about salary. I was just expressing some surprise that people making over $50k/yr are complaining that their salaries are too low. I honestly didn't know programmers' salaries were so high. Reading Slashdot regularly, I had figured that programmers were living below the poverty line.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    9. Re:Sigh. by Darth · · Score: 1

      You arent taking into account the cost of living.

      Look at places like silicon valley. The cost of living is ridiculous. In some places, $20k/year is a livable salary. Hell, my mother raised two kids on a lot less. In Silicon Valley or New York, you'd be homeless.

      I remember reading somewhere that garbage men in New York make $50k/year. it's not that they're better garbage men than garbage men in boise, it's just that it costs a hell of a lot more to live in New York.

      When the salaries of programmers are forced downwards by H1Bs, the cost of living in these areas doesnt necessarily go down.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    10. Re:Sigh. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How's that, exactly?

      The current influx of H1B workers came in under Clinton's reign of terror. You just weren't paying attention. The economic fallout we suffered circa 2000 was due to 8 years of politically-motivated economic sabotage, artificial market stimulation (releasing much of our petrolium reserves), and various other nonsense.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Sigh. by Eskarel · · Score: 1
      The issue is cost of living, which is why American workers can't win the outsourcing game. Now just as a disclaimer I left the US and now work in Australia where I was born(dual citizenship), but it's an issue of math. I make 40k a year, which seems like a lot of money compared to 20. However after rent, food, utilities, and paying off my student loans(which are from the US and thus much higher than they'd be if I'd gone to school here), I could, assuming I did nothing fun at all save about 5-7k a year after taxes. Consider that the average home price in my city is over $300,000 and that even apartements are usually in the $200,000 range not including corporate fees and the like and this money doesn't look quite as good anymore.

      Now I'm just new in the industry and I do support which will never pay as well as programming because we're a black hole to the bean counters, but the general point is that $40-50k is fuck all depending on where you live.

    12. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm stupid here, but what exactly is wrong with bringing in non-US citizens to compete against you?

      It's not like you have some monopoly on needing to eat. Lots of people around the world are far worse off than some college educated American. Those people deserve jobs just as much as you do. If they are willing to do your job cheaper than you are, then they deserve the job and you don't. It's that simple.

      There's no morality here - it's simple supply and demand. If you could buy a Ford Escord for $50000 or at the dealer next door for $6000, you're going to pick the $6000. Programmers are becoming a commodity, and you'd have to be stupid to pay more for that commodity than you have to. It's not somehow morally wrong to buy it from the cheaper dealer.

      Like it or not, YOU offer your skills for a certain amount of money. If someone can find a valid replacement for those skills for less money, they *should* take the cheaper alternative.

      Like it or not, the universe does not care about *you*, personally. The sooner you get used to this idea, the better off in life you will be. The universe is harshly impersonal.

  44. Send 'em home by Syberghost · · Score: 1

    Yeah, send 'em home, where they'll make even LESS money! I bet they'll feel really great about that.

    If we'd just stop sending people over there to put guns to their heads and force them to come work here, they'd be so much better off.

    Giving somebody 75% of an American wage to leave their home country, where the average wage is something like 7.5% of here, is not exploiting them; it's a win for the employer and a win for the employee. They can work here for a year and make what they'd make in 10 years back home. Even if they have to spend a lot of it to live, they still clean up. Back home, they can use that to jumpstart a better life; plus, experience with an American company looks awesome on their resume back home, so they make more money THERE too.

  45. Error in the report by HampiRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The report does not accounts for the fact that the money that a company pays for a H1B worker to a staffing firm is exactly the same that it will pay to an employee.

    Most of the H1B workers in USA are recruited though a staffing firm. The staffing firm does the visa for the worker and brings them over to USA. The staffing firm then sends the worker as a contractor/consultant to the companies where he actually works. The company pays the market rate to the staffing firm. However the staffing firm (bodyshopping firms) take a major cut from that money and that is why your H1B worker gets paid less.

    If you really care about the state of the foreign workers on H1B, then come to terms with the fact that they are required for worker/skill shortage in your economy which does exceedingly well by trading globally. The worker shortage might not be reflected by the employment figures as there are many jobs (code coolie types like maintainence, porting etc) that American workers do not want to do. Who does them ? Your underpaid H1B worker. Why is he paid less ? He has been targetted and potrayed as low cost job foreign job snatcher, because of which companies are reluctant to recruit him directly. So if you want to talk about ethics, then stop this diatribe against the foreign H1B worker.

    1. Re:Error in the report by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I've got an easy answer to that- companies that trade globally for profit are traitors to the United States.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Error in the report by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Oh, so "Marxist Hacker" is a believer in "Socialism in one Country".

      Fucking reactionary scumbags. Make me want to puke.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    3. Re:Error in the report by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      If you don't like the reaction- then maybe what should be avoided is the action. Basic newtonian physics.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Error in the report by readin · · Score: 1

      The worker shortage might not be reflected by the employment figures as there are many jobs (code coolie types like maintainence, porting etc) that American workers do not want to do.

      Nonsense. The only reason Americans don't want to do the jobs is they don't pay well enough, and they don't pay well enough because there are foreigners willing to do them for less. The number of foreigners in different parts of America varies greatly. Who do you think does the jobs that "Americans do not want to do" in places like Iowa, Idaho, South Dakota, and Kentucky?

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    5. Re:Error in the report by HampiRocks · · Score: 1

      I guess you did not read my original posts. The company pays the same amount to the staffing firm for theses tasks that it will pay to an American worker. If American workers want premium rates for doing maintenance in an global economy the I can only say: dream on !!

  46. Was experience considered? by janolder · · Score: 2, Informative
    While I'm sure there is some validity to the article, I do wonder whether the authors compared apples and oranges. What happens to an H1-B holder after a few years? He becomes a permanent resident. What also happens in that time-frame? His pay increases.

    In other words, I strongly suspect that the data can partly be explained with the lower average experience (or time on the job, if you will) of H1-B holders. I certainly see that at my workplace.

    I work for a quickly growing 600 employee company with a significant H-1B percentage. Part of my job is interviewing and recommending engineers. I have never been pressured to hire an H1-B candidate over a permanent resident or a citizen. Our one and only concern is qualification. I've also never seen a case where the hiring team's choice of a candidate was overruled on the basis of cost.

    1. Re:Was experience considered? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure there is some validity to the article, I do wonder whether the authors compared apples and oranges. What happens to an H1-B holder after a few years? He becomes a permanent resident.

      While you are often correct- it's not supposed to be able to happen, and if the Bush Administration has their way, holding any H- or L- class visa will make you ineligible for a green card or any other permanent residency status, and you WILL be shipped home after 6 years.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  47. I am shocked! by Volatile_Memory · · Score: 1

    Shocked to find gambling here in Casablanca!

    --

    /**
    I have a "Zero Policy" tolerance.
    */

  48. Skill? This is not a question of skill by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but a 73k per year programmer is not exactly a sparkling gem amongst rubes.
    The people I pay 73k per year are shall we say... competent production level programmers, who left to their own devices will write utterly pedestrian and might I say, rather bug-riddled code with no sense of architecure or design other than that already provided by others via a framework.

    My heavy hitters, and the ones I rely upon to help compose, shape and craft and add to the product as a whole and who have innovative ideas get at least 110K per year.

    And I don't think my approach is all that unique.
    Get in a core team of 2-3 Senior people to design, architect, mentor and lead and a rag-tag horde of underlings to do the grunt work.

    So if these "average" programmers on H1-B are paid 20K less per year on average...
    Is it really a statement on skill, or the fact that there are extra costs associated with an H1-B? Take into account the cost to the company of the H1-B status itself as well as importing and housing the worker. And that's before you get into wage expectations, where a 73K per year job might be perfectly acceptable to most Americans, a person from India would look at 56k per year as a pile of riches. Would they haggle over any offer made to come work in the US which offered riches compared to what they got in India? Hell, I bet you could get people to come over for 30k per year if you wanted.

    So no, it's not about skill.
    It's about offsetting additional costs and India being an employers market for employees who have far less expectations (and greater niavity) than their American counterparts.

  49. Hire a bunch of college graduates. by Dak_Peoples · · Score: 0

    My company has been hiring a bunch of hungry college graduates. College 'new' hires easily get paid of those H1-B workers. Then again, new hires get paid peanuts. Noted, Californians get paid 10% more usually to compensate for the 10% income tax

    --
    This is my signature.
  50. By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    An American is either a native, naturally born citizen or a naturalized immigrant. The H-1b visa is a "non-immigrant" visa, not intended for use by immigrants.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Wrong. H1-B is a so called "dual-intent" visa, not a "non-immigrant" visa.

    2. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wrote this 'constitution' ? Let's see...was it written by descendants of the western european settlers who defeated the native americans ?

      Maybe the H1Bs should write a constitution, and declare that only H1Bs or their decscendants should be called Americans. The older immigrant groups are discriminating against the newer immigrants. If only these newer immigrants came with nuke backpacks, only then their constitution and rights would be respected.

    3. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That's not what the congresscritters are describing it as: I've got at least 10 letters from Rep David Wu that I shouldn't worry about H-1bs because they're "non-immigrant guest workers" who "will be gone in six years". I of course pointed out several H-1bs I know who got green cards, but it fell of deaf ears. It's only this week that the Bush Administration started to figure out that this was happening, and promised to send all guest workers home at the end of their visas.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Who wrote this 'constitution' ? Let's see...was it written by descendants of the western european settlers who defeated the native americans ?

      True enough- and they forced it on my region of the country, Cascadia (my ancestors include both groups- native americans and western europeans).

      Maybe the H1Bs should write a constitution, and declare that only H1Bs or their decscendants should be called Americans. The older immigrant groups are discriminating against the newer immigrants. If only these newer immigrants came with nuke backpacks, only then their constitution and rights would be respected.

      Some of them are- but not on H-1b visas. Those enlist the help of MS-13 to come across the southern border.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by LanceUppercut · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh? You mean they are planning to send home people, who are here _legally_, who obey all laws and pay full-blown taxes? And at the same time they are not doing anything about the hordes of illegals in the US? This is not possible, even if we take into account the immense stupidity of the aforementioned Administration. You probably misunderstood something. Legal guest workers will not be _sent_ home by anyone, unless they want to go home themselves. This is going to be that way until I say otherwise.

    6. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Huh? You mean they are planning to send home people, who are here _legally_, who obey all laws and pay full-blown taxes?

      If they exceed the stay of the term of their visas, they are not here legally, and they are not obeying "all laws". Or at least, that's the view of the Department of Homeland Security.

      And at the same time they are not doing anything about the hordes of illegals in the US?

      Nope- the same plan includes the new H5A visa, which retroactively gives them 6 years to work in the United States- and then ships them back to their country of origin.

      This is not possible, even if we take into account the immense stupidity of the aforementioned Administration.

      Well, actually it technically IS possible- but I'm not sure how many pwople would actually LIKE to live in the resulting country.

      You probably misunderstood something.

      Nope. You missed something in my original message: "At the end of their visas".

      Legal guest workers will not be _sent_ home by anyone, unless they want to go home themselves.

      True- but since the H- and L- class visas are "Guest Worker" visas, not intended to be a path to permanent residency, when those visas expire they become illegal aliens and have 21 days to either return home or be sent there.

      This is going to be that way until I say otherwise.

      DHS said otherwise last Friday.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Who wants the jobs that illegals are working?

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    8. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      If they exceed the stay of the term of their visas, they are not here legally, and they are not obeying "all laws". Or at least, that's the view of the Department of Homeland Security. Well, your original statement sounded as if they will be unconditionally denied any opportunity to stay in US _legally_ (through EBGC, for example). True- but since the H- and L- class visas are "Guest Worker" visas, not intended to be a path to permanent residency, when those visas expire they become illegal aliens and have 21 days to either return home or be sent there. Not exactly. Once again, H1Bs are officially "dual-intent" visas. By design they assume the possibility that the worker might decide to immigrate. For example, a tourist might be denied a visa on the basis that he/she failed to convice the officer that he/she will come back home. An H1B applicant cannot be denied visa for such a reason.

    9. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, your original statement sounded as if they will be unconditionally denied any opportunity to stay in US _legally_ (through EBGC, for example).

      I don't think anybody really knows- I know Lou Dobbs mentioned it on his program, and while against guest worker programs in general, seemed to be a bit confused on that point as well. Guess we'll have to wait and see if this passes Congress.

      Not exactly. Once again, H1Bs are officially "dual-intent" visas.

      Not anywhere in the law near as I can tell is this explicit- where the reforms proposed by the Bush Administration ARE- guest workers will NOT be allowed to proceed to permanent residency, they want to avoid the debacle that the 1986 Amnesty proved to be.

      By design they assume the possibility that the worker might decide to immigrate.

      That's not the way Congress understood them to be- nor is it explicit that they are dual intent in the law.

      For example, a tourist might be denied a visa on the basis that he/she failed to convice the officer that he/she will come back home. An H1B applicant cannot be denied visa for such a reason.

      Instead they just will require a bond to cover the cost of shipping the H-1b applicant home in the new proposal. And if it's not being enforced now, then I can only assume that the INS is perpetuating a fraud against the American people- because H and L class visas were SPECIFICALLY non-immigrant visas when they were passed originally.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Who wants the jobs that illegals are working?

      Anybody- once they're paid a competitive wage to do that job. That's what wage depression means. The free market is supposed to have this thing called "supply and demand" where the hourly wage rate will rise until those jobs are attractive once again. By allowing illegal workers, you raise the supply, causing the price point for demand to fall. By not allowing illegal workers, you lower the supply- causing the demand price point to rise.

      All this really means is that there won't be any workers to EXPLOIT, not that there won't be any workers AT ALL. Offer $10/hr and your berry field will still get picked.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by ameoba · · Score: 1

      OTOH, paying $10/hr for berry picking would significantly drive up the cost of berries, reducing the amount of the end product that consumers are going to buy so, while you have a few people paid attractive wages, you end up with far more unemployed Mexicans, consumers unable to afford berries and farmers closing up shop.

      In a 'free market' you don't have artificial, government sanctioned price controls on goods and services. Having illegals pick your berries is a lot closer to a free market than having the government mandate that you pay $6/hr to have it done.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    12. Re:By the Constitution of the United States by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      OTOH, paying $10/hr for berry picking would significantly drive up the cost of berries, reducing the amount of the end product that consumers are going to buy so, while you have a few people paid attractive wages, you end up with far more unemployed Mexicans, consumers unable to afford berries and farmers closing up shop.

      True- and I personally thing that would be a GOOD thing. If you can't stand paying the worker a fair price for his labor, you don't deserve to buy the product.

      In a 'free market' you don't have artificial, government sanctioned price controls on goods and services. Having illegals pick your berries is a lot closer to a free market than having the government mandate that you pay $6/hr to have it done.

      Which is why free markets are evil. Thanks for proving my point.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  51. not again... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

    Every single time this subject comes up on slashdot, there will be an outraged US worker who says something along the lines of "people higher H1Bs because there cheeper". My response to that is: you're not out of a job because of H1B workers, but because you can't write properly.

  52. Years of experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "unbiased" study ignores a key factor. He's comparing salaries of non-visa employees - which includes senior folks with years of experience, with H1-B types. The H1-B folks are nearly all just out of college - the rest of the world (typically India) hasn't had enough of a software industry to have that many wizards with 20 years of experience.

    So he's comparing mostly newly graduated hires against a group with, on average, a decade of experience.

    Software is so critical to so many businesses, saving $20,000 a year means nothing, getting the SMART FOLKS means everything.
    So folks who might be displaced by H1-B entrants are "also ran" programmers. I'm surprised to see so many of those
    posting to slashdot.

  53. Cheap labor AND skill? by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article summary would lead us to believe that companies are hiring foreign workers who are less skilled, for less money. If that's true, then it actually makes sense, and doesn't imply any kind of terrible unethical business practice.

    However, I'm guessing that they're hiring foreign workers that ARE skilled, but paying them less money. That certainly does sound bad. But what if the jobs aren't disposable? If a person makes himself invaluable within an organization, I wonder if he couldn't demand proper compensation regardless of his nationality.

    In my mind this is another issue of the American worker getting screwed. I'm sure that many people take it the same way. If something is done to even the score here, then it should be to benefit the American workforce, and not the foreigner who comes here by choice and is willing to work for lower pay. The outcome would likely be the same though no matter which side you approach it from.

    Another thing to consider is that by hiring lower paid foreigners, companies may have more money to throw at US workers. Although that argument would probably work a little better if programmers were calling the shots and employers were scrambling to hire good people, like it was 6-10 years ago.

    I'm not against foreign workers and I'm not a strict nationalist, but I do believe that a strong middle class is necessary to sustain our economy long term.

    1. Re:Cheap labor AND skill? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      But what if the jobs aren't disposable? If a person makes himself invaluable within an organization, I wonder if he couldn't demand proper compensation regardless of his nationality.

      Good luck- in the current job market that is no longer possible. EVERYBODY is replaceable according to HR.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Cheap labor AND skill? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Good luck- in the current job market that is no longer possible. EVERYBODY is replaceable according to HR.

      More to the point, HR is willing to dispense with you even if you're indispensible, even if it endangers the company's survival.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Cheap labor AND skill? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Well, long term survival anyway- short term survival is dictated by stock price vs headcount.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  54. Blame American CEOs by Teckla · · Score: 1

    Make sure you lay the blame at the feet of those who deserve it: American CEOs.

    American CEOs are sacrificing long-term viability for short-term profits. Sure, chasing the H-1B fad or offshore outsourcing work will save you money this quarter. But eventually, American software companies will fail because they did such a good job training their future competition.

    1. Re:Blame American CEOs by TheSync · · Score: 1

      CEOs are sacrificing long-term viability for short-term profits

      Where is your evidence for this? Except for a quarter here and there, US GDP continuously grows. There is zero evidence that the US does not have long-term viability.

  55. H-1B is the answer to "herding cats" by mariox19 · · Score: 1

    I worked for a company that designs software for the retail industry -- point of sale and back office systems. There were many H-1B VISA workers there, and still are from what I know.

    Some of us other workers weren't convinced it was what the company was paying them that was the big attraction in hiring them; rather, we thought it was the "advantage" of having a worker who, if he or she failed to "please" you for any reason, could be shipped back to whatever godforsaken country they came from.

    I worked at this company up until about June of this year. Numerous american programmers had decided to jump ship, finding work at other companies, work with better pay and working conditions. The foreigners who were there on the H-1B didn't have this option, from my understanding.

    I'm not saying it's not the money. What I am saying is H-1B -- aside from the money -- is the answer to the problem of "herding cats." No more "prima donna" programmers who have the temerity to say "take this job and shove it." Instead, you have workers who dread being shipped home.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    1. Re:H-1B is the answer to "herding cats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your understanding is incorrect. H1B's can move to a new job the moment their new employer files for the transfer i.e. in under two weeks. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H1B for details. So I doubt any H1B is going to put up with crappy job conditions for long, because the H1B's are usually as entrepeneurial (if not more so) than US citizens.

    2. Re:H-1B is the answer to "herding cats" by HampiRocks · · Score: 1

      H1B transfer is tedious (law and beaurocracy and all) and chances of finding soem good and decent employer who will do this is less.

    3. Re:H-1B is the answer to "herding cats" by linuxbikr · · Score: 1
      Technically true but the reality is much different. You try finding an employer to take on the costs of an H1B visa transfer. I've done it twice and only got the second one because I guaranteed them my green card by the time my visa expired. The first happened about year before the dot-com implosion.

      H1B is essentially indentured servitude. I can vouch for the wage differences for H1B personally because I've lived it. You have virtually no mobility as an H1B holder and the employer holds all the cards. The costs for an H1 transfer run between $1200 and $2000 and the employer promises the INS/USCIS that if they terminate you and you cannot find a new position within 10 days, they pay for your "return to home country" costs. Essentially, they post a bond for your return. And employers who bring you in as an H1B will often hold the costs of moving and filing costs against your starting salary. I was 15-20K below market when I came in under my H1B.

      So, yes, an H1B will put up with crappy job conditions because they typically have no choice. Companies are required to prove they looked for an American to fill the position (an H1 requirement) but the salary range and experience requirements they list are often so out of whack that no qualified person would apply due to the far-below-market wage requirement. So meeting the dosmetic requirement is a farce because the employer really wants the cheap H1B.

      Don't raise the H1B visa limit. It really is a means of getting cheap labor.

    4. Re:H-1B is the answer to "herding cats" by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      What I am saying is H-1B... is the answer to the problem of "herding cats."

      This problem has already been solved: Velcro
      Kitty stays put!

      Not that I'm suggesting H-1B workers should be velcroed.
      That would be wrong.

  56. I'll Tell You Why... by michaelzhao · · Score: 1

    My Dad was a H1B worker until he got his greencard. The reason companies pay less, is because if they pay the same, they can get sued from the unions. Think of it this way, the unions believe it isn't fair to pay a man that isn't even an American citizen the same wages because that deprives a "real" American of a working job. Hence, companies must pay lower under the risk of a civil suit from the Union.

    However, eventually, the company benefits the H1B worker with a Green Card, the first step to citizenship... (I'm getting my US citizenship in December...)

    1. Re:I'll Tell You Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what union??!? programers union? geek union? what union are you talking about? alli can see is a geeking looking joe pescii "look buddy! you goona join da union or Rock-o and me are gunna root your boxen". Nope sorry. Thank you for palying, please try again.

    2. Re:I'll Tell You Why... by spitzak · · Score: 1

      This has got to be one of the stupidest comments I have ever seen.

      First, there is no programmers union.

      Second, it is well known that unions *want* higher salaries. Lower salaries for non-union employees obviously decrease the demand and/or salary of union employees and is blatently obviously against their interest. A union may try to *outlaw* non-union employees, but they certainly don't try to lower their salaries.

  57. This is not always true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B expires after 6 years maximum, that's after renewals. Anyone working longer in the states will need some other form of work permit. The study doesn't seem to factor this in at all. Many H1Bs are terminated sooner.

    If you looked at a comparison of salaries between 'all programmers' and 'programmers who have worked less than 6 years' I'm sure there's a similar disparity.

  58. That's why we need to promote labor laws overseas by Safe+Sex+Goddess · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If we worked to promote comparable labor protections in other countries, it wouldn't be cheaper for companies to outsource jobs from the US. It also wouldn't be cost-effective to bring in visa holders.

    --
    Abstinence is a government conspiracy. www.SafeSexZone.co
  59. Perhaps it's by choice... by tool462 · · Score: 1

    I don't know how prevalent it is, but I have known at least a few H1B folks who came to the US either for college or just after. They started in the work force, then after garnering some experiencing and saving up a bunch of money, they moved back to their home country where they could live in relative wealth and comfort. If there is a large enough number of people that do this, you effectively skew the average H1B salary lower, as they have relatively more entry level positions than experienced positions compared to native workers.

    But, since the plural of anecdote isn't data, this may be unfounded. It would be interesting to see a comparison of H1B salaries compared to native salaries for a given level of experience. I'm betting it's still lower, but it may not be as drastic as the OP indicates.

    1. Re:Perhaps it's by choice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely correct. One can hold the H1B status up to only 6 years. Whether he goes back or not, by the time he has more than 6 years of experience he won't be considered H1Bs. The salary comparison given in the study is worthless.

  60. I'm not a racist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My maid is from the Columbia and my programmer is from India.

    1. Re:I'm not a racist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My maid is from the Columbia and my programmer is from
      > India.

      Bingo! Good to see someone else can read between the
      lines. See the post 'Pervisity Just Beginning' in this
      forum.

  61. I'm a H1-B employee... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... and I refute the implication that I'm treated like a 'slave' or 'indentured labourer.' Yes I might make less than a US-born programmer, but I make a hell of a lot more than I was getting in the UK. Plus, I get all the benefits of being in California (cool lifestyle, nice weather, affordable stuff, etc.). And as someone else said, it's better for you guys that I'm here spending my money and paying taxes here rather than remaining in the UK and doing outsourced work from there.

    On a side note, I can't vote here despite paying my taxes to Uncle Sam, but I can vote in UK elections by mail.

    The other down side is that if my job goes, my visa goes with it soon after and I'm on the next plane back. However it becomes a lot easier to go through the green card application process when you're based here.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as someone else said, it's better for you guys that I'm here spending my money and paying taxes here rather than remaining in the UK and doing outsourced work from there.

      It would be even better for us guys if you weren't here at all, AND weren't doing any work for a U.S. company and they hired an American to do the job. That's an option you seem to have overlooked.

      Yes, it'd be worse for you, but then we care about you the exact same extent you care about us -- not at all.

    2. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      That's where you're wrong actually. An added benefit is that my company's products are now cheaper and more affordable for your ungrateful self.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Knara · · Score: 1

      First time I've ever seen someone say that California had "affordable stuff".

    4. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Oh, and we fuck your women too. Just thought you should know.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      "Yes I might make less than a US-born programmer"

      AHA, evidence that the article WAS right. You should make EXACTLY the same as the US Programmer if the H1-B system was not being abused.

      A LOT of H1-Bs are here on contracts, the contracts are often setup as 1099's which means the WORKER pays ALL taxes, not just half and the employer half. The H1B doesn't pay the taxes and flys under the radar for a few years until they get the Green Card then they Government knows about them and they start paying. It's illegal but there are a lot of companies out there that don't care.

    6. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can vote, but only for your first 10 years out of the country. Then you lose that right also.
      How much it matters depends on how long you intend to stay in the US

    7. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you've never been in London i guess...

    8. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Skowronek · · Score: 1

      Your spending habits apparently don't include LOTS of computers/chips/electronics. And I thought I was here on /. between fellow nerds...

    9. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here as a H1B too; the pay was indeed lower than prevailing wages for the same education / experience level by quite a bit (through all sort of tricks; e.g., using old data to determine prevailing wages, job specification and grade, etc.). Nobody who knows anything about it or experienced it would deny that; when I read the article I wondered 'what's the scoop?' duh. The other advantage for the employer is having employees who will not complain about unpaid overtime (I'd love to see the numbers on an actual hourly basis just for the laughs), lousy working conditions, and generally speaking being treated like dirt, and won't leave for the competition; you see, as a manager of the large company that sponsored my visa told me once (or twice): 'if you don't like it, you can go back to where you come from'; and knowing that if you loose the job, you loose the visa and have 10 days max to packup and leave is a strong incentive to just get along (ever tried to plan for your future a bit with such a threat?). I tendered my resignation the very day I got my green card.

    10. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An added benefit is that my company's products are now cheaper and more affordable for your ungrateful self.

      And buggier, too. Thanks a lot.

    11. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An added benefit is that my company's products are now cheaper and more affordable for your ungrateful self.

      I hope they're not only cheaper, but free, because you displaced a local worker who ends up unemployed. And you ARE indentured, because like you said, your green card status depends on you staying at your present job.

      They won't even hire a local worker at your SAME reduced wage, because a local worker can change jobs and doesn't have to wait 5 years for greencard status. The employer is concerned a citizen will hop over to a rival company that pays better.

      I don't blame YOU for it. It's your right to seek out the best opportunities for yourself. But the system is going to end up breaking itself. People here won't be able to buy houses, cars, or anything else working at Wal*Mart with no benefits. The cash machine that keeps the economy churning will disappear because nobody here will be able to afford anything. Companies save 30% in the short term by burning through cheaper foreign labor, but will end up unable to sell anything back to customers in their own country.

      You, too, are doomed. Because once you get your green card, and can seek better opportunities, they will sack YOU for another, cheaper, card-less worker.

    12. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by Chris6502 · · Score: 1

      likewise am an H1-B worker from the UK. For me money is not as much an issue, it is the improved lifestyle, cleaner air, more freedom (I bought a handgun just beacause I could :) and so on. Having said that I am earning considerably more than I did in the UK and am pleased to do so.

      I do not feel that I am being abused in any way by my employer. My salary has gone up considerably since I came here in 2002 and is I believe comparable to that of my colleagues.

      My only gripe is not being able to vote here. Wasn't there some war about taxation without representation a while back?

      --
      UNIX: 'cuz you can tattoo it on your knuckles!
    13. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      They'll sack nothing of the sort. If he wanted to sack me he'd have done it long before now. I can stay here as long as I want. I can get my green card and go for better money, or I can get my green card and stay at the same rate.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    14. Re:I'm a H1-B employee... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      No it's not. My boss prefers to hire Europeans as engineers because he places higher value in Euro universities than American ones.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  62. H1-B holders have less experience by evw · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can only hold an H1-B visa for 6 years (3 years plus 1 renewal). After that you either get a green card or go home. The "job titles" compared (e.g. Programmer/analyst) are sufficiently general that they seem to be comparing H1-B holders right out of school with little expereience, to more senior people. It makes sense that the less experienced people get paid less.

    1. Re:H1-B holders have less experience by HikeFanatic · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend is working on an H1-B visa. She already had one extension and just this weekend got the final paperwork for her green card. It will arrive in one year or so. I've had a lot of discussions about her experiences and she knows how badly underpaid she is compared to her peers.

      The moment she gets her "get out of jail free" card, she's gone. I don't blame her, either. In her case, she's being taken advantage of really badly.

      There were a lot of H1-B sweatshops here in Silicon Valley during the boom period. I saw companies with nothing but H1-B visa holders who were working with horrible conditions knowing that they couldn't leave the company or else they had to so home. Sort of being stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    2. Re:H1-B holders have less experience by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      You can only hold an H1-B visa for 6 years

      This is not true. If a greencard application is filed before the 5th year is over, an H1B can be extended by one year every year until the greencard application comes through (which takes many, many years). It is entirely possible to be in the US on an H1B for 10+ years.

    3. Re:H1-B holders have less experience by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that the people being hired for H1Bs are fresh out of college. There is nothing to support this. The H1B worker could have 15 years experience in his native land.

      A job title generally is something like "Senior Programmer/Analyst" or "Programmer III" and the title has a job description. It is not hard to match up jobs by description, even if the titles are different.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    4. Re:H1-B holders have less experience by JoeF · · Score: 1

      That's of course not true.
      Examples:
      - Foreign professors get H1s.
      - People with PhDs get H1s.
      - People like Linus Torvalds get H1s (Linus has a Greencard now, afaik).
      - etc.

  63. From this months issue of Duh magazine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sky is blue, the pope is catholic and engineers on H1-B's get paid less.

  64. Let's check something, here by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    Are the H1 workers being forcibly loaded onto boats and hauled into the US to take these jobs?

    Because I've gotta say, if they're doing this willingly, then it's the market economy at work.

    Mod this -1, Capitalist Pig.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  65. Better here than in India by readin · · Score: 1

    I would still rather compete with them while they're paying an American cost-of-living than have to compete against them while they're paying an Indian or Chinese cost-of-living. Keep bringing those programmers over here. Keep the jobs here where at least I have a chance of getting one. And keep the costs at an American rate.

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  66. I wonder what's the problem by someone1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would be happy with that $53000 too. I get less than half of that!

    --
    Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
  67. You are a /.er with an Asian GF that reads /.?? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    I call BS! ;-)

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  68. Micro$oft by Z-Knight · · Score: 1
    A new study shows that companies hire foreign workers for cheap labor, not skill.

    This applies completely to Micro$oft...look at the quality of their products, obviously it took little or no skill to produce them.

    ...ducking and hiding now...waiting for the flame mail

  69. Indians.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .... speak English, very often better than USians or even British people (gramatically speaking, the accent is a completely different matter, I know of people from different regions in the US that struggle to understand people from other US places, and don't ask a Londoner with strong Cockney leanings to try to understand a person from Glaswog).

    I work with Polish, Chinese, Pakistanis, Indians, Spanish, Japanese, Italians and of course USians and British people, and frankly the language is a non issue in most circumstances.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Indians.... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      speak English, very often better than USians or even British people (gramatically speaking, the accent is a completely different matter,

      I really don't care if the grammar is better or worse. What I care about is being able to understand my coworkers. Super-thick accents and cultural blocks get in the way of that.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Indians.... by superdude72 · · Score: 1

      [Indians]... speak English, very often better than USians or even British people

      Well... no. Not always. I know that India is a former British colony, but most of the people there don't speak English as their first language, and many don't speak it at all. Speaking grammatically perfect English is a sign of having picked it up in school rather than as your native tongue.

      And why do you have to say "USian," anyway? We're called Americans. People from Canada are called Canadians, people from Mexico are called Mexicans, even though we all reside on the same continent. OK? It's not the least bit confusing, unless you choose to make it so for some purpose that completely escapes me. We don't call ourselves Americans because we think we're more authentic residents of the continent than Canadians or Mexicans, but because "USian" or "United Statesian" sounds fucking moronic.

  70. Just something I'd like to point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it's popular opinion to bash H1B's, there are a number of factors that no-one considers or is probably even aware of unless you actually *are* a H1B holder.

    Firstly H1B's pay EXACTLY the same income tax and Social Security as regular employees, and from this we can expect zero in return. My status means I am ineligible to claim against any of the deductible's I have contributed to for the last 6 years.
    Plus given that the majority of States are 'at-will' employment, if I am made redundant for any reason, I have approximately 10 days to leave the country (thank you very much).

    The other major point to consider, is that it is actually VERY difficult to find another employer that will hire a H1B (unless you're being brought in from India), so you can end up being stuck. I was lucky and did manage to change jobs, but not before I burned through a lot of telephone interviews where my first statement was indicating my H1B status, saving both of us from wasting our time.

    Lastly not all H1B's are here as cheap labour (as my 6 figure salary will contest), and remember I'm contributing to your unemployment for free next time you go pick up that check.

  71. Article is not right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it is true that some companies out there are exploiting H1B for cheap labor, but not all companies do that. Most of them pay the H1B employees with the prevailing wage, and some of them even pay the H1B employees much higher than the prevailing wage.

    I would suggest if you don't believe me to check this website from DOL that shows which company hired H1B, for what position, and for how much at this http://www.flcdatacenter.com/download/H1B_efile_FY 05.zip for Access file or http://www.flcdatacenter.com/download/H1B_efile_FY 05_text.zip for TXT file.

  72. Simple explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies hire H1Bs and Americans right out of college, both work for a couple of years for the starting salary. Both get promoted, etc. But then the H1B guy becomes a resident after 5-10 years and now his higher salary does not count towards the H1B average anymore... bingo: H1Bs are underpaid and exploited!

    There are lies, damn lies and statistics.

  73. 2 points... by tygerstripes · · Score: 1
    1: At least they're keeping money pumping around the US economy, as opposed to spending it in their countries of economy. Whether you're a die-hard US patriot or not, you have to agree that this is a good thing, in relative terms, when you consider how much outsourcing is done to eastern countries for the sake of profit. (In the UK, you're damned lucky if you can phone your bank and get someone with a decipherable accent).

    2: If you want to solve the problem (as a nation) then abolish the abuse of the H1b (or working-visa, or whatever). If you can't effectively "indenture" foreign nationals by holding the visa-noose around their necks, they're in exactly the same position as any other US citizen. They're on equal ground, and nobody can complain that they're cheaper for any reason other than that they're choosing to work for less. They can make the same demands as everyone else. Then it's up to US programmers to be more competitive, if that's how it plays out.

    Good ol' free-market economy again. After all, isn't that the corner-stone of the US economy and society? Can't get more patriotic than that...

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  74. This study: Apples and Oranges by otisg · · Score: 1

    Just read the Slashdot blurb, but this sentence implies this is an Apples and Oranges comparison:
    "The average salary for a programmer in California is $73,960, according to the OES. The average salary paid to an H-1B visa worker for the same job is $53,387; a difference of $20,573"

    Apples : programmer in CA
    Oranges: H-1B visa worker

    Not all H-1B visa workers are programmers in CA. I've got plenty of non-programmer friends on H-1B visas - designers, bankers, advertizers, marketing people, etc.

    --
    Simpy
  75. Right Numbers, Wrong Reason by Bibliographer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    H1-B's are predominately hired into entry-level positions, and as such their salaries should be expected to be lower than the average. Most of them are college freshouts who just completed a degree in the US, and have exhausted their student visas. They are paid the same as other new hires that are college freshouts. Trying to say that H1B's make less money than the average engineer is like saying a newly hired freshout makes less money than the average engineer. Duh. If you've ever been involved in hiring an H1B visa person, you know that you must fill out government paperwork documenting the salaries of staff in equivalent positions. The starting salary of that H1B cannot be less than those workers. In the real world you get a stack of 300 resumes. You pick out the top 30. You bring them in for interviews. By law, you're not allowed to ask what kind of visa they might be on, only if they can legally work in the US. You send out job offers to the best candidates. You then find out your top 3 choices need H1B's. You either pursue them or settle for the lesser qualified candidates. If you have the budget (it costs me more to hire an H1B) and your company hasn't exhausted its H1B quota, you go for the more qualified H1B candidate. Otherwise you settle for a lesser candidate.

    1. Re:Right Numbers, Wrong Reason by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1
      H1-B's are predominately hired into entry-level positions

      Support this statement with facts.

      If you've ever been involved in hiring an H1B visa person, you know that you must fill out government paperwork documenting the salaries of staff in equivalent positions. The starting salary of that H1B cannot be less than those workers.

      Actually, they are not SUPPOSED to be paid less, but the point of the article is that they are, in fact, being paid less. The article charges that companies are abusing the system and are making up job titles to do so.

      In the real world you get a stack of 300 resumes. You pick out the top 30. You bring them in for interviews. By law, you're not allowed to ask what kind of visa they might be on, only if they can legally work in the US. You send out job offers to the best candidates. You then find out your top 3 choices need H1B's. You either pursue them or settle for the lesser qualified candidates. If you have the budget (it costs me more to hire an H1B) and your company hasn't exhausted its H1B quota, you go for the more qualified H1B candidate. Otherwise you settle for a lesser candidate.

      So, in the real world, the top 3 choices need H1Bs? What makes a candidate one of the top 3 choices? Could expected salary play into that?
      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  76. What an opportunity! by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    Hiring people on H1B visas gives people from all over the world an opportunity to come work in the United States of America (tm).

    The deal is excellent: a chance to start at the bottom. And stay there.

    ...laura, more than a little pissed off today (no, nothing to do with visas)

    1. Re:What an opportunity! by TheSync · · Score: 1

      "The Bottom" of the US is a big improvement from where they are coming from.

      A billion people are now being added to the global economy in India and China, because their governments are finally getting a grip on basic economics.

      It doesn't really matter whether they come here on H1-B, or stay there with offshoring, they are coming, and we better be ready to compete, but also to enjoy the benefits of enhanced global wealth, because we will all benefit in the end.

    2. Re:What an opportunity! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      and we better be ready to compete...

      You obviously don't understand reality economics. This is not competition, this is lowering labor costs in the short-term so that the senior management can fatten their own paychecks and perks while making their first-quarter P&L statements look better. What the actual effect is to destroy the tax base of this country - hasten another - but much worse - Great Depression - which won't affect the top one-tenth of one percent who control most of the actual wealth of this nation. Real competition would entail getting superior CEOs from overseas - of offshoring all those corrupt corporate-lackey politicians' jobs.

    3. Re:What an opportunity! by TheSync · · Score: 1

      This is not competition, this is lowering labor costs...

      It means competition in that Americans can no longer afford to be low-skill workers. People have to get educated to survive now, because globally more and more low-skill workers are coming on the global market.

      The results would be no different than if robotics technology improves to remove all low-skill labor jobs globally. This will happen, of course.

      What the actual effect is to destroy the tax base of this country

      I don't see any evidence of the tax base of the U.S. decreasing. From 1987 to 2004, only 2002 and 2003 saw income tax revenue decreases (a result of a brief recession plus Bush tax cuts). In 2004, income tax revenues were up compared to 2003, and 2005 is supposed to be even higher.

      The Great Depression was caused by a combination of a stock market bubble and what is today considered horrific monetary policy by the Federal Reserve (tightening during the downturn), with the bad results extended by many New Deal policies.

      This last time when a stock bubble burst, the Fed moved to appropriately loosen monetary policy, and the government reduced tax rates, thus the recovery (and results like last quarter's 3.8% GDP increase).

    4. Re:What an opportunity! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Go back and closely study tax revenues from 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 - I believe you are mistaken there. You don't understand the underlying economics and economic cycles - you are simply parroting back the pseudo-stuff you've read in the media. The Great Depression resulted from a concentration of wealth in the US - quite similar to what has occurred today.

      Your response to my statement that it wasn't anything other than lowering labor costs was nonsensical and doesn't address the point. You appear to be uneducated judging from your response.

    5. Re:What an opportunity! by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Go back and closely study tax revenues from 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 - I believe you are mistaken there

      Individual Income tax revenues from the IRS data,

      1999 - $1,002,185,765
      2000 - $1,137,077,702 Increase
      2001 - $1,178,209,880 Increase
      2002 - $1,037,733,908 Decrease
      2003 - $987,208,878 Decrease
      2004 - $990,248,760 Increase

      you are simply parroting back the pseudo-stuff you've read in the media

      No, what I am saying is mainstream economic science. I suggest you read what Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke said about the Great Depression, or here where he says about the Fed's behavior leading to the Depression "You're right, we did it. We're very sorry." This is someone who holds a Ph.D. in economics from MIT, was a visiting professor of economics at MIT, an associate professor of economics at Stanford, and a professor and department chair of economics at Princeton, a Fed Governor, and now the Fed Chairman.

    6. Re:What an opportunity! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      I'm suitably impressed - just as I'm impressed when Greenspan states he's stymied as to what is causing said loss of jobs or said lack of real job creation or other events which are directly related to China dictating our money policy (with a bit of leverage from Saudi Arabia, which has an estimaed $6 trillion invested in the US economy).

      Save the superficial sophmoric "I'm so impressed by the creditials" for after the year 2007 which the stuff really hits the fan.

      For the record - I suggest you pay attention to the economists who really know what's going on: Samuelson at MIT, the head of the economics department at University of Maryland and Stephan Roach at Morgan Stanley.

  77. I don't mean to sound ignorant or anything, but... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there really anything wrong with that? Most large companies already outsource many jobs overseas. Since these people are not citizens, they may plan on making some money here, and spending it at home to improve their life there. There's nothing wrong with that morally of course, but that would be bad for the US economy. I don't know many foreign people that have worked in the US, but the few I have have eventually gone back to their native country. I might go to Japan someday and work. I wouldn't expect to get full pay as a foreigner though since it might not go back into their economy. Now if I was registered as a citizen and wasn't getting equal pay, then it might be something to bitch about.... But in typical working situations, people that get payed are expected to just put the money back into the economy, and that doesn't always happen w/ non-citizens.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  78. Missing the forrest for the trees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When two people negotiate an agreement, the only swindler is the government who forces itself between them.

    1. Re:Missing the forrest for the trees by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      When two people negotiate an agreement, the only swindler is the government who forces itself between them.

      You forgot about the Lawyers who insinuate themsevles here and there, much the same ways fleas attach to a passing animal.

      You need

      • Legal advice to bind the parties
      • Witnesses
      • Legal reprenstation when it goes tits-up
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  79. Skills are skills. by itomato · · Score: 1

    Skills are skills!

    Companies usually pay for "bodies", not "minds". Ability and overall outcome are stressed, instead of individuality and the unique gems that arise there.

    If you *can do without* some skills, while *raising* the overall ability of your unit while saving money, it's managerial effectiveness.

    It may sound sterotypical in this screwy, post-P.C., post-civil rights world, but face facts: People from different regions of the world show extraordinary aptitude in differing areas. Some exhibit above average physical ability, some excel at mathematics, some at procedural thinking, some at economics and accounting, some at mechanical engineering, and specialties within those fields that may be shared by other groups.

    For millions of years now, Earthlings have been specializing in their own cultures. Some of these cultures have endured for eons and flowered many, many times over. The development of social, logical, critical, and mathematical skills are common in every culture.

    The distillation of abilities that have utility in this global marketplace, and their desirability based on quality and intensity is the same in essence as the Old World spice markets, fine perfumes or wines.

    That in and of itself is a beautiful thing. However, like many other beautuful and powerful things, it can be used for Good or Evil. Mix politics and/or profit in there, and it can be a sour experience.

  80. Devils IT Advocate by KrackHouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're opposed to H1Bs ask yourself a question... Are you using anything that wasn't made in America? Think of all the American jobs lost because you weren't checking for "Made in the USA". So why is it that cheap foreign labor is just fine when it makes your shoes and electronics cheap but "immoral" if it happens to affect the industry that employs you? The American car industry tried that in the early 80s and it backfired. Import tarrifs were needed to keep prices equal with the Japanese which raised prices for CONSUMERS un-naturally. Nobody wanted to pay the inflated prices so sales tanked costing 50,000 jobs. Sure, Americans working at the Honda dealership lost their jobs but at least the Japanese couldn't embarass us with their amazing productivity right?

    I do not want to pay more for my stuff because you can't compete with foreigners. The alternative is that we just offshore the work in which case they don't spend money in America which is even "worse" for the economy. Please read Bastiat's famous plea to ban sunlight for the benefit of candlemakers if you disagree. They were making fun of this type of logic in the 1800s.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:Devils IT Advocate by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      This argument is disingenuous. The problem isn't with cheap, foreign labor. The problem is that companies are importing the cheap foreign labor to America.

      Following your argument, you would have no problem with the U.S. auto manufacturers importing cheap labor from Mexico to build cars because it would (theoretically) lower the cost of cars. And, you would have no problem with other companies importing cheap labor because it would lower costs as well.

      Of course, it would lower wages across the board, increase unemployment, and might even make you unemployable. It would be a wonderous return to the pre-union days of company stores and $5.00 a day wages.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Devils IT Advocate by ph1ll · · Score: 1
      I do not want to pay more for my stuff because you can't compete with foreigners.

      Then don't pay for your stuff at all. I'm serious. All the software I use is free.

      Software is moving away from the manufacturing model. It's becoming a service industry. So, analogies with the Japanese dominance of the automobile industry have only so much mileage (if you'll pardon the pun).

      Everything that can be outsourced has been outsourced. In fact, a lot of stuff that can't be has been too! That's why a lot of work is coming back to the West (if the number of agents 'phoning me is a valid metric).

      I don't think we should be complaining about offshoring. It has not proved to be the pernicous force in IT people thought it would be three years or so ago.

      However, H1B is totally different. I cannot believe, that with all it's multibillion dollar IT companies, India does not have cheap executives that the West cannot poach. The savings would be huge but it's only the lowly coder who is offered H1Bs.

      You have to ask yourself "why is that?".

      --
      --- "We've always been at war with Eastasia."
    3. Re:Devils IT Advocate by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

      Ahh, sorta like in the 1800s when we couldn't breed fast enough to fulfill the promise of manifest destiny so we "imported cheap foreign labor" which turned into our ancestors. We're sucking the life out of foreign countries as their best and brightest head to America. I heard a senator call that unethical.

      If the job is lost either, I'd rather have that person living in America, paying taxes and buying stuff from my store. It looks like automation and productivity are outstripping our ability to create new jobs. The stock market is doing just fine even though consumer sentiment sucks. I'm not pro big government but at some point we're going to need to feed the under-employed. Some people look at a life of unemployment supported by the rich as a utopian dream, others see that as humiliating. If it's inevitable then we might as well lose the attitude and enjoy retirement. Or you could always learn new skill and try to compete.

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
  81. Flawed study by JoeF · · Score: 1

    A study that lumps together people working in high-salary areas like Silicon Valley and people in areas that aren't as overhyped as the Valley is fundamentally flawed.

  82. More than protectionism ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1, Insightful


    China is a slave labor state. The introduction of capitalism liberates the Chinese about as much as the slaves of Rome.

    Until you can vote for the men who write your laws, Chinese labor will NEVER be able to effectively organize and raise their living standards.

    All we are doing by trading with China is empowering the worlds new industrial plantation system. Cut'em off. Treat em like we did the Soviet Union (or benign Cuba).

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:More than protectionism ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we are doing by trading with China is empowering the worlds new industrial plantation system. Cut'em off. Treat em like we did the Soviet Union (or benign Cuba).


      Funny you should mention Cuba. Isn't their #1 export people? I thought the intention was to bring less Chinese workers over here.

  83. Don't judge a job by its title by iambarry · · Score: 1

    John Miano's report compares salaries for job titles on H-1B disclosure forms with job titles from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    When they don't match up exactly (I would expect not too often), it seems he subjectively finds a match.

    I'm not saying that H1 programmers make more or as much as natives, but I would suggest the methodology of this report is lacking. It probably doesn't mean anything. Especially when compared to the common sense knowledge we all have that if an employer can pay less for qualified employees, they will.

    --Barry

  84. Supporting grossly disproportionate wages by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    To think, they could be spending more on their own countrymen and supporting their grossly disproportionate wages.

    But that is exactly what they are doing with the H1-Bs: Spending more on their own countrymen (meaning members of their country club) and supporting their own grossly disproportionate wages. Disproportionate by any comparison: U.S. Executive to U.S. employee, U.S. executive to non-U.S. executive, U.S. executive/employee ratio to non-U.S. executive/employee ratio. Take your pick!

    It's not the oppressed foreigner that takes advantage of the visas. They are just the smokescreen, the distraction intended to be the target of our ire. If we are the rich to the H1-B poor, then Robin Hood is actually King John and he's keeping 75% of what he takes. I doubt Robin Hood we be as famous for the description "He steals from the rich to make himself exceedingly rich, oh and to pay the poor a little".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  85. This is about illegal activities by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People start dragging out their same tired old positions on the topic of H1B visas and don't seem to be talking about the actual article. It's unsurprising. We have all decided our positions on the issue long ago. (Aren't we all just so Pavlovian?)

    This article is about bringing to light some general evidence of illegal practices that are defrauding the U.S. Government. It's a serious crime that doesn't get punished often enough and it's pretty sad. I actually still believe in the whole free market drive. If programmers are available from somewhere else cheaper, then let it be. Maybe programmers are overpaid anyway. I don't know enough about it to really know if that's the truth or not. But when we're talking about defrauding the government in order to lower your businesses operating expenses, then I'd say someone needs to be held accountable and should be barred from holding office in a publically trade corporation.

    Businesses that operate (and compete against others) using illegal activity should be shut down plain and simple. If the evidence offered by the article is skewed or incorrect then of course that should be discussed and wouldn't it be nice if we had evidence offered that would counter the article's assertion? ...anyway...

  86. OSS Cheaper yes, but less skilled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Apparently, programming skills are not as precious as we would all like to think; there are many workers in China and India that will work for less than half of what we make here; this is the same thing that has happened in other industries historically."

    Pfft! I can find an OSS programmer who will work for free.

  87. A price to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just until we get the green card!

  88. Idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just what programmer's union is going to sue a company for paying H1B workers too much?

    There is no such programmer's union because programmers aren't unionized.

    Get a grip.

    1. Re:Idiotic by michaelzhao · · Score: 1

      I may have not been clear. It isn't just tech companies that are hiring H1B workers. Any company does. Also, there have been cases of individuals suing companies that laid off American workers before H1B workers.

  89. You're assuming they pay their taxes ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    From my acquaintences I've found this generally not to be the case. The IRS really doesn't exert any effort to MAKE them pay taxes.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:You're assuming they pay their taxes ... by ajshankar · · Score: 0

      Except that as H1Bs they are likely working for companies large enough to sponsor them, who will almost certainly be extracting their taxes from their paychecks automatically.

    2. Re:You're assuming they pay their taxes ... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

      You're full of shit. H1B employees have their taxes withheld like any other employee.

  90. Gravy Train Over--Time to Get Real by mkcmkc · · Score: 3, Insightful
    World per-capita income is something like US$10K/year. For those of us who have been making more than this, we may consider ourselves lucky. (And just that--lucky--not morally entitled.) It's only fair that other people in the world get a turn at the trough, and in any case, it's inevitable. No point wailing about it.

    There are two things that you actually have the power to do to help yourself:

    • Look for employment niches that cannot be economically off-shored, H1B'ed, etc., in the near future. They exist, and that's where the hidden hand of capitalism is telling you to go.
    • Stop spending money. You don't need three cars, you don't need cable, you don't need to eat out, and rice and beans are really cheap. There's a storm coming, and it's time to save like you've never saved before. (Yes, if everyone does this, the economy will crash. That's inevitable, too, as long as so much wealth is concentrated in so few hands.)

    Complain if you like, but above all, act.

    Mike (trying to practice what he preaches)

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:Gravy Train Over--Time to Get Real by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and most of the world lives a subsistance farming exsistance with little or no healthcare, no computers, no refrigeration, no cars, and ramshackle housing.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:Gravy Train Over--Time to Get Real by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "There's a storm coming, and it's time to save like you've never saved before."

      As long as you aren't saving currency. Transfer your holdings into tradeable goods. Land will continue to appreciate in relative value as long as population continues to increase.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Gravy Train Over--Time to Get Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think many people living in NYC earning 10K would consider themselves lucky, while I bet a lot of people earning less than half of that in some countries would consider themselves royalty.

    4. Re:Gravy Train Over--Time to Get Real by mkcmkc · · Score: 1
      I don't think many people living in NYC earning 10K would consider themselves lucky, while I bet a lot of people earning less than half of that in some countries would consider themselves royalty.

      Yes, I agree. And this is one of the pressures that will cause NYC jobs to flow to those countries. When enough jobs have moved, the costs of living will equalize.

      (I'm not saying that this is good, just that it is inevitable, and that we should prepare ourselves.)

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  91. Vote 'Em Out by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The H-1B visa laws are produced by Congressmembers. Everyone in the House is up for election in just 1 year: find your Reprepresentative and snail mail them a polite letter telling them they don't represent you when they pass and support laws like the visa program. Find your Senator and do the same, though only the one up for election next year, if any, is going to pay any real attention. These people work for us, when we make them - but not until then.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  92. Raises by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the companies are using the H1B workers to pay them $20,000/yr less, do you think they'll give them large raises. What if they don't? The H1B code monkeys aren't going anywhere, they'll work for $30,000/yr, it is still better than what they get in their home country. Most of them will underestimate the living expenses and will think they are getting a killer deal. It is like me, when I tell my family in Russia what I make here in America, they are all "ooh"-ing and "aah"-ing like I am some kind of a millionare, they don't know that my car insurance is $200/month and utilites another $150/month and car payments, mortgage, school loans etc etc

    1. Re:Raises by Axe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      20K per year savings are bogus. Subtract legal fees and compare equivalent positions and there are no savings, only headache of dealing with corporate lawers.

      In all decent companies I know about H1B workers are given raises and are generally well regarded. In my group they are probably the brightest employee.

      Code monkeys are in India. Know your enemy.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    2. Re:Raises by ScooterBill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The cost in $$ and time of getting a software engineer up to speed and integrated into a company will easily outweigh the cost savings of hiring on the cheap. Companies don't want cheap labor, they want more productivity for their $$. We've hired both local and foreign software engineers and the overiding factor is always the quality of the engineer / the cost. Our highest paid software engineer is local and we consider him to be a bargain even though we pay him very well. Other H1-B workers started at 10k-20k less than prevailing wages but now make comparable salaries because we want to keep them.

      One factor that is overlooked is that, stereotypically, we've noticed that H1-B engineers are much harder working and have none of the typical American "you owe it to me" kind of attitude. The H1-Bs we've hired are a joy to work with. I really don't care if "the locals" don't like it. It's not their business that I'm running. There's a lesson in there somewhere...

    3. Re:Raises by chriso11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep - you owe me Xmas off! And I'm not going to work every weekend either! Oh, and after 12 hours a day, I'm leaving. Yep, such a primadonna!

      I worked with an H1B visa - as soon as he was a permanent resisdent he told his old company to kiss off and left for a better deal. I have looked at what they are paying new H1B visas (based on the required postings) compared to new college hires, and they were paid ~20% less.

      And I bet you wonder why the number of american kids enrolled in technology and science degree programs keeps dropping. I've got news for you - the kids aren't stupid - they see that there is no real future there. Take a look in the mirror - you get to see one of the causes!

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
    4. Re:Raises by wealthychef · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And I bet you wonder why the number of american kids enrolled in technology and science degree programs keeps dropping. I've got news for you - the kids aren't stupid - they see that there is no real future there.

      They ARE stupid if they think that science and engineering has no future. Where do these brilliant students go to make money? These geniuses are either going to leech off their parents or they are not going to be well off if they reject science as an option. Do you think a law degree or a medical degree is so lucrative compared to a good engineering degree? I'm not so sure about that.

      The truth is that kids aren't becoming scientists not because of money, but because they are looking for a way to have a good life, meaning make a good contribution to the world. We put scientists down as geeks and emphasize money over all else. There is zero appreciation for science in the popular culture, compared to Indian and Chinese cultures, where becoming an engineer makes you a respected professional, even a hero to your family.

      The fact is that unless we continue to improve our skills here, we will lose ground. The fact is that complaining about how hard our competition in the labor market works is not going to cut it -- we will have to work as hard as they do. They want it more, so they are getting it. They are offering their labor for a lower price and it is just as good usually. Why shouldn't they get the prize?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    5. Re:Raises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right on Axe. We wouldn't have to keep reading stories like this if it wasn't for a bunch of vocal, generally incompetent programmers who somehow think they have the right to a job simply because they're citizens.

      Too bad, morons - competition created the industry, and compete is what you have to do to reap the rewards. Saying "but I'm American!" just highlights your failure. The pretence that you actually care that foreign workers are being paid less is shameful in the extreme.

      In the company where I worked as a H1B I made the same as the citizens as did all the H1B workers.

    6. Re:Raises by billsoxs · · Score: 4, Informative
      They ARE stupid if they think that science and engineering has no future. Where do these brilliant students go to make money? These geniuses are either going to leech off their parents or they are not going to be well off if they reject science as an option. Do you think a law degree or a medical degree is so lucrative compared to a good engineering degree? I'm not so sure about that.

      Well let's see:

      Point 1) Our US students that go beyond a BSEE tend to get an MBA. It is easier and typically pays better than a MSEE. More respect in business and shorter hours as well.

      In fact a few years ago the Dean of the School of Management PO'd local CEOs of high tech companies by saying that they needed to raise salaries and treat engineers better - right after the CEO pi--ed and moaned that they could not hire enough US engineers. [Personally, I'd be bored to tears as an MBA but that is me.]

      Point 2) My wife (an MD) makes a lot more than I do... I have a PhD and similar numbers of years of experince. Finally my older brother a JD (lawyer) makes a lot more then me. Both of them are treated better as well. I guess our students are not all that dumb. But then this feeds right into your next point. US businesses do not really care about engineers and there is no real respect for the field. [Again, I'd go nuts in almost any other field - but that is me and I am not typical.]

      --
      This message was brought to you by "Lack of Sleep."
    7. Re:Raises by syphax · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you think a law degree or a medical degree is so lucrative compared to a good engineering degree?

      You forgot an MBA. Regardless, the answer to your qestion, here in the US, is generally *yes*.

      Now, most doctors (at least the ones I know) work crazy hours, and their job description is increasing crappy, thanks to our wonderful health care system. And corporate lawyers (at least the ones I know) tend to work crazy hours, and man I can't imagine anything more life-sucking than corporate law.

      Me, I am trained as an evironmental engineer, but chose to cash out as a management consultant instead. I'm becoming increasingly dissatisfied, though, and plan at some point to give up some $ for something more meaningful with less travel (young kids at home).

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    8. Re:Raises by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you think a law degree or a medical degree is so lucrative compared to a good engineering degree?

      1. More stable. Tech has a history of volitility and constant change (some think that is good, until you are 52 and nobody wants you)

      2. More upward mobility. Tech may pay relatively well early, but it tends to flatten after that.

      3. More political protection from globalism because they are better organized as trade groups.

    9. Re:Raises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you that being a scientist in the United States is not very respected. There are many disturbing characteristics - from the denial of global warming to opposition to stem cell research to Intelligent Design being taught in schools. Even the President routinely ignores the recommendations of the variety of scientific committees. The American culture is actively avoiding the "materialistic and amoral" scientific view of the world. This is being forced by a lot of religious fundamentalists. Yet the irony is that culture is instead shifting to the post-MTV/metrosexual/bling-bling/show me the money. So the fundies are trying to turn the wrong knob to change american culture (even if there was a right knob, could they actually make a difference?), seeing no change, and so they are getting even more frantic in their efforts.

      One important note: I don't think that the loss of respect for science is only the results of the religious fundamentalists. But they are a major player.

      And yes, lawyers and doctors are significantly more respected.

    10. Re:Raises by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      The truth is that kids aren't becoming scientists not because of money, but because they are looking for a way to have a good life, meaning make a good contribution to the world. We put scientists down as geeks and emphasize money over all else. There is zero appreciation for science in the popular culture, compared to Indian and Chinese cultures, where becoming an engineer makes you a respected professional, even a hero to your family.

      If you really, really want to know why kids don't see engineering as a viable career... it's when there are job titles like "refuse disposal engineer" (binman) and "sanitation technician" (bog cleaner)... who wants to become an engineer or technician then...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    11. Re:Raises by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you think a law degree or a medical degree is so lucrative compared to a good engineering degree?

      I don't know about the US, but here in the UK I have the distinct impression that a top lawyer will be earning more than a top engineer could ever hope to. For example, I've never heard of a programmer charging more than about £1000/day, while I have heard of lawyers charging £1750/hour. (Of course they won't be pulling that in 8 hours/day, but even 1 hour/day gives them 75% more than the programmer, plus potentially a boat-load of free time)

    12. Re:Raises by emilper · · Score: 1
      The truth is that kids aren't becoming scientists not because of money, but because they are looking for a way to have a good life, meaning make a good contribution to the world.

      Consider the SF movies made in the US in the '50s and those made now: then the "scientist" was a cool guy, and got the girl; now the scientist is the freak, more often than not he causes all the trouble and gets killed first, and most of the times he is Russian, and mad too. Getting the girl? No way ...

    13. Re:Raises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He said 'compete', moron! Not walk-in-here-coz-anyone-can. its you who fails to appriciate the logical or critical thinking.

      dont care if u are american or not but by your parameters you are def a crappy engineer.

      fyi america does have immigration rules and any HI-B that you do see around you are in fact competing. Not just for your jobs and salaries but they've already competed and beaten hundreds probably thousands of others in their own country before getting a work visa.

      Now if you do want to keep thinking that they are all crappy engineers then so be it. Just dont be too surprised when you find urself saying "would u like fries with that, Sir" quicker than u think.

    14. Re:Raises by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Did you just call them stupid for thinking that Science and engineering has no future, then say you're not sure if an engineering degree is lucrative?

      I didn't go into the sciences, because the entry level science jobs looked like janitorial work. And if you're lucky, you might actually do something worthwhile after about two decades.

      Engineering? 4 years of crazy math and teachers telling you to go "Look it up.", I might as well just toss my money into a bonfire.

      The fact is, unless it's a hobby, no one is going to improve their skills in anything unless it brings in money to support themselves and their family.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    15. Re:Raises by sashako · · Score: 1

      In Russia that would be "refuse disposal manager" and "sanitation manager".... Most ppl here don't like managers but respect engineers. That's old soviet habit, not a job market reality.

    16. Re:Raises by Castar · · Score: 1

      (Of course they won't be pulling that in 8 hours/day, but even 1 hour/day gives them 75% more than the programmer, plus potentially a boat-load of free time)

      On the other hand, they have to wear those wigs. So maybe it all balances out.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    17. Re:Raises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what kind of moron programmer would charge by the day?

    18. Re:Raises by nido · · Score: 1

      Point 2) My wife (an MD) makes a lot more than I do...

      That's because she's in a field that is highly subsidised by the government.

      It used to be that people became doctors primarily because they wanted to help other people. Big money was reserved for doctors who were true healers; most doctors had the standard of living of their patients, or a little bit more. Now there's the perception that doctors are super-well-paid, which attracts a different kind of student. I have a friend from college (who was some kind of engineer) who said he was applying to med school because it was his best chance at pulling in the big $$$$.

      Understand the history of insurance, and you understand the problems with the insane cost of medical care today. Nutshell version: In the early 20th century, lumber mills offered "hospital insurance" as a benefit for their workers. If they got injured on the job, the company would pay their hospital tab. Durring WWII, the government imposed price caps on what companies could pay their workers. Needing more workers, some companies said, "if you work for us, we'll cover your doctor bills." Medicare started in 1965. Today, many private insurers use the Medicare payment scales as a model for what they'll cover. Pretty soon doctors figured out that since the government was paying, cost was no object in taking care of their patients... Which just so happened to line their pockets as well.

      100 years of Medical Robery (part 1, on the history of the AMA and establishing a medical monopoly)
      Real Medical Freedom (part 2, which really gets into the history of insurance)

      My grandparents' experience demonstrates the folly of government insurance. My grandmother came down with end-stage blood-cancer about a year ago. Left untreated, she probably would have lasted a month or two. But she went to her doctors at the Mayo clinic, who left nothing on the table in trying to kill her cancer. I have no idea how much medicare spent on Grandma's behalf, but it was at least $50,000. The last visit they took a bone-biopsy, and her marrow was 90% cancerous. She died one week after starting hospice care, six months after the initial diagnosis - which was exactly how long her doctor said she'd last without treatment.

      So what'd the goverment's $50k -> $100k buy? 4 months? maybe? If grandma had known what she would have to go through, I think she'd've gone for hospice first.

      My grandfather collapsed and went unresponsive about two years ago. A couple of weeks later they said, "he needs a pacemaker". Didn't cost him anything, but Medicare and his secondary insurance put out $100,000 on his behalf. A year and a half after that (6 months ago), he collapses and goes unresponsive again. "You had a seizure, take these pills". (His pacemaker has NEVER fired...) Grandpa's case is a big guessing game for his doctors, and they don't care what it costs, because the government is picking up the tab.

      I won't get into my maternal grandparent's experience (another $200k in the last 2-3 years?)

      Medicare only serves to keep people alive past their expiration date, make medical providers vastly wealthier than they would be otherwise, and makes medical care for the rest of us cost more than it should.

      Which infers that it also sucks smart people into the medical field with the promise of wealth and status, people who maybe would've been engineers.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    19. Re:Raises by Grym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Medicare only serves to keep people alive past their expiration date...

      Says the twenty-something poster on slashdot. I like that. It's a "surplus-population"-phrase for the new century! Tell me, when's your expiration date?

      Which infers that it also sucks smart people into the medical field with the promise of wealth and status, people who maybe would've been engineers.

      But wait... if what you're saying is true, you've just invalidated the anti-"Lexus standard" point of one of you links--which is that the artificial lack of medical schools does NOT raise the quality of care. You can't have it both ways.

      Medicine in the United States needs to re-evaluate its role and methods. The medical school application process could definitely use an overhaul in order to bring in those actually interested in helping others. You won't get an argument from me there. But it's not an evil institution. Nobody forced your grandparents to have "unnecessary" surgeries. In fact, ironically enough, the whole concept of patient autonomy was brought to the forefront by your much reviled AMA.

    20. Re:Raises by nido · · Score: 1

      Tell me, when's your expiration date?

      The day I cease to carry my own weight. 3/4 of grandparents are still alive, but they're not really living, not anymore. They're just sitting around (can't walk very well at all anymore), watching T.V., waiting to die.

      In native American communities, when someone got "old and frail", they'd leave the tribe, go out into the wilderness, and leave their body for the spirit world. That's my plan.

      Nobody forced your grandparents to have "unnecessary" surgeries.

      My grandparent[s] are [/was] in the habit of waking up every morning. Social conditioning has made them a little afraid of dying. When their doctors said "we can treat this" and Medicare is willing to pick up the tab, why should they turn them down? "No thanks, that'd be a waste of the taxpayers' money, I'd rather end my time here on earth with grace and dignity"? Yeah right. Given the choice of living or dying, most people will choose to live, because it's the choice they're most familiar with. And with the financial cost being the same either way, there's little incentive to chose to decline fancy, expensive yet futile treatments.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    21. Re:Raises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. He said "citizens". There's a difference between reading something and comprehending it. Clearly that's news for you. And do go look up the word "citizen" in a dictionary. Then try comprehending it, as well as his sentence.

      And, my clueless wonder, you also seem to be unaware that people can indeed judge you quite accurately by your communication skills; or in your case, your lack of them. You seem to be unable to form a proper sentence. Clearly a reflection of your poor thought processes.

    22. Re:Raises by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Prev: Point 2) My wife (an MD) makes a lot more than I do...
      You: That's because she's in a field that is highly subsidised by the government.


      Bullshit. She's in a field where:

      A) She must be licensed to practise her work.
      B) You have to go through an enormous amount of work to get that license.
      C) Medical schools limit the number of incoming doctors.

      In effect, we have policies in place to keep the number of doctors down, presumably to weed out all but the very best. That is the reason medical doctors can charge so much - basic supply and demand. You have the demand and you can't get it supplied from anyone but them.

      Your little rant on the history of insurance really doesn't factor in. Your little rant on Medicare doesn't factor in either. If you want to lower the cost of medicine, then train more doctors. You're just going to have to live with the possibility that he/she may not be that great when you need them the most.

      Oh, and your preference that old people should just go off into the woods and die is both repugnant and barbaric. You may praise the Native Americans for this. But, there is a reason why they hadn't even invented the wheel when the Europeans found them. They were primitives that hadn't progressed from the stone age. We've come a long way since then, but obviously you haven't.

    23. Re:Raises by lorcha · · Score: 1
      Regarding being an MD: Being an MD is not necessarily more profitable than a BSEE. Remember, doctors continue their schooling well past getting a BS, which means while the BSEE is out making money, building a nest egg, etc., future physicians are getting up to their eyeballs in debt. They don't even start their careers until age 29. Many specialists don't begin their careers until their mid 30's! That's a lot of years of negative earnings while a BSEE has positive earnings.

      Don't forget the interest on the student loan debt. While I have significant savings, the average med school graduate has $100,000 - $200,000 worth of student loans. My money is working for me. Doctors' debt is working against them.

      And let's not forget quality of life issues. I work during normal business hours. I have 3 uncles who are various types of doctors and they work crazy hours and carry a pager. In their 50's and 60's! WTF?

      So being a doc is not automatically a better life and/or better earnings than being technical.

      Also, regarding being a lawyer, that is a total mixed bag. The best lawyers do very well financially, there is little doubt of that. But the hours suck, and if you don't get yourself into a good firm, you're making surprisingly little money. For instance, my father in law's firm pays first year associates between $70-80k. Was it really worth going through law school/bar exam for that?

      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    24. Re:Raises by Bush+Pig · · Score: 1

      > my father in law's firm pays first year associates between $70-80k

      I would have been _very_ happy to make that kind of money right after I graduated, even with the extremely long hours they'd be working. I'm only making about $A75k with ~15 years IT experience and a very good degree.

      I'm not sure I quite understand your point.

      --
      What a long, strange trip it's been.
    25. Re:Raises by MKalus · · Score: 1
      I don't know about the US, but here in the UK I have the distinct impression that a top lawyer will be earning more than a top engineer could ever hope to. For example, I've never heard of a programmer charging more than about £1000/day, while I have heard of lawyers charging £1750/hour. (Of course they won't be pulling that in 8 hours/day, but even 1 hour/day gives them 75% more than the programmer, plus potentially a boat-load of free time)


      I am sure there is the random engineer that climbs the corporate latter to the same level.

      Sure, there are lawyers out there who charge that much, but I also know lawyers who are not better, if not worse, off than I am.

      And that is the reality as well.

      Sure, you can look at the top 1% of earners and say: "Hey, your top 1% makes more than my top 1%, but really, you're forgetting the other 99% who are making a lot less.

      I had contacts in the past where I was paid $150/hour, and I did had 10 hour days, so in the end I would have ended up with $1500/day as well.

      But the real question is (and I think that was answered further up): Why do people chose a profession? And the reality is quite true and simple that most kids chose it because they want to make a big buck. You've seen this during the dot.bomb years when suddenly everybody rushed in trying to make millions.

      I would wager the guess that the average engineer is no better or worse off than the average lawyer.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    26. Re:Raises by Grym · · Score: 1

      The day I cease to carry my own weight... In native American communities, when someone got "old and frail", they'd leave the tribe, go out into the wilderness, and leave their body for the spirit world. That's my plan.

      A society which doesn't value its elderly because of their (seemingly) low economic value is a crummy one indeed. There's a type of the wisdom that can only be garnered through time. The native americans knew this. If their societies could sustain their elderly populations to the extent that we can today, such practices borne of necessity would not have been so commonplace.

      3/4 of grandparents are still alive, but they're not really living, not anymore. They're just sitting around (can't walk very well at all anymore), watching T.V., waiting to die.

      That's a very pessimestic view.

      I work in the healthcare field, and while for many elderly patients that may be the case, I can tell you that it is certainly not like that for all of them.

      I've seen 90 year-olds sharper and in better shape than people half their age. It all depends. Personally, I'd hate to design a system which pressures such people to die (or makes adaquate healthcare unavailable) simply because of the year they were born.

      -Grym

  93. Oh please! by sprayNwipe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (Disclaimer: I'm a dirty foreigner caught in red tape)

    I've had to go through a number of processes and trust me, H1B's are hardly "easy ways to get cheap labor" for employers.

    Maybe you're forgetting that the usual visa cost for one of these is $20,000? Or that the visa only lasts for, at most, 5-6 years?

    What about the fact that most cases where "dirty foreigners" are needed are in skilled creative fields like games, which also (suprise suprise) end up having lower salaries?

    Or maybe that you have to apply about a year in advance, and that makes ultra-skilled people gravitate towards visas like the L-1 and the O-1(that can be renewed indefinitely), thereby skewing salary surveys?

    If employers want cheap labor, they'll outsource to India, not go through years of government red tape and tens of thousands of dollars per employee.

  94. economics! by SmellTheCoffee · · Score: 1

    H1B's are getting paid less does not come as a surprise. H1B's are called here just because they are comparably skilled AND can be paid less. I know a company that would only hire H1B's and then keep them under constant pressure of losing their job. This way they would work with their head down and mouth shut. Not exactly what the H1B's have heard about America (land of free)...not their fault either that they landed in this trap. However, I also believe this kind of exploitation and outsourcing has its roots in capitalism. Earlier in the previous century when the world was not so much open...technology could be kept confined but in this age...it is hardly the case. With technology pervasive, more people get into it and we start to see the blurring of lines. Today India and China are emerging markets/powers with lot of talent but in few years we might see smaller African and other countries claiming the piece of the pie. It is just technological and capitalistic evolution.

  95. Outsource the work to..India? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Oh wait those dudes came from India. Bummer.

  96. Amazing grasp of the obvious! by skipperjohn · · Score: 1
    My! What a grasp of the obvious! The results of this study rank right up there with ones such as "The crime rate is higher in areas with low income", or "Wealthy folks have better health care than poor folks".

    As been iterated many times in these replies, any IT worker in the USA knows that H1B workers were hired to cut payroll expenses (not fill positions that were lacking in personnel). When the H1B workers were first allowed, it was supposedly under the condition that they would make the prevailing wage for the position they were filling. If that were the case, why were existing IT workers training H1B workers, who then replaced their trainers (who were consequently let go).

    How many companies were prosecuted for violating the original rules about H1B replacements? I don't think any were!

    The H1B program was (and is) a shame perpetrated by our legislators at the urging of business management. It did nothing for the US workers in the IT industry.

    I've seen articles in regards to US students about "Why Johnny can't program". The real answer is, "Why should he?". To train an H1B worker to replace him?

    When the management and executive positions are also taken over by H1B folks (it would save a lot more money than replacing the workers), then perhaps those folks will also get it.

  97. H1Bs cannot switch jobs. by OGmofo · · Score: 1


    That is the biggest and perhaps only problem I have with the system. If it were trivial for an h1b to say "hey...these guys are screwin' me, I'm going to work Spacely Sprockets across the street", then we would have a fair system. As it is, they are essentially indentured servants.

    1. Re:H1Bs cannot switch jobs. by mattis_f · · Score: 1

      Not really true...

      You can change jobs. But the new company needs to sign some paper work, stating that they take over the responsibility for your visa. I haven't changed work place, I'm happy where I'm at, but a friend of mine has. It's not *that* big a deal.

      Cheers.

    2. Re:H1Bs cannot switch jobs. by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Not true. Starting the EBCG process - that's what normally limits the worker's ability to switch jobs. H1B by itself does not prevent anybody from switching. It's just a matter of filing some paperwork and it's easy to do.

  98. Well duh. by localman · · Score: 1

    By putting so many regulations and restrictions on how H1B's can work, they've created indentured servitude. And surprise surprise this lets companies underpay them, which in turn allows them to undercut American labor much more effectively. Because of their fear of fair competition, they've encouraged the exact behavior they were seeking to avoid.

    I'm personally of the opinion that we should open the borders wide, and let all residents be legal aliens. Like it was before the xenophobia early last century. Like back when poor immigrants came over and built the country and economy we so love today. Yes, it'll be ugly for a bit, and some native born people would have to compete with foreign born people, but survival of the fittest, right?

    Cheers.

  99. Well, what's your profession? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    What do you do that makes less than $53,000 a year? I'm assuming it isn't a skill based profession, but more a blue collar job of some sort?

    Disclaimer: I'm a college freshman and made $6,000 last year

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  100. The answer is become a US citizen. by Xenious · · Score: 1

    If you don't want to be a US citizen then why are you living here in the first place??? With the exception of working for a global company and being transfered over here as an expat you should live where you want to be a citizen. Want to come work in the US? Sweet, come on in! Just be ready to stay a while and welcome home. :)

    Oh and stay away from California! I want the cost of living there to go down so I can move there and afford more than a shoebox. ;)

    --
    -Xen
  101. Also doesn't account for conversion by donutello · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most H1B's are folks who've been in the workforce for a relatively shorter period of time. Most H1Bs are actually dual-status, which means they are applying for a Green Card while working as an H1B. Green Card processing typically takes 4-5 years. They are not classified as H1Bs once they get their Green Cards - which coincides with them acquiring additional experience and raises.

    I make more money now than when I was an H1B and it has nothing to do with my visa status and everything to do with the fact that I have more experience doing what I do now than I did before.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:Also doesn't account for conversion by a1englishman · · Score: 5, Informative
      Most H1B's are folks who've been in the workforce for a relatively shorter period of time. Most H1Bs are actually dual-status, which means they are applying for a Green Card while working as an H1B. Green Card processing typically takes 4-5 years. They are not classified as H1Bs once they get their Green Cards - which coincides with them acquiring additional experience and raises.

      This argument overlooks the fact that the H1-B program is designed to allow employers to aquire talent that isn't available within the US. That would mean that these people are valuable. They shouldn't be grunts, they should be people who poses detailed and specific information which wasn't avaible in an American candidate. That being the case, the H1-Bs should be appearing near the top of the pay curve, not the bottom.

    2. Re:Also doesn't account for conversion by defunc · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the fact that they had you by the nuts, so even if you wanted to ask for a raise, you didn't have much to bargain with.

      --
      .defuncrc
    3. Re:Also doesn't account for conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I came to the US 13 years ago. I had just finished a PhD, which gave me certain specialized knowledge that my boss couldn't find in the US. However I didn't have much experience of programming to go with that knowledge. So I didn't merit a high wage. Since that time I have acquired said experience and my boss (the same one who originally hired me) has rewarded my gain in experience by doubling my salary.

    4. Re:Also doesn't account for conversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Your PhD gave you specialized knowledge that somehow someone else can't get? Where did you find this PhD? I mean, how did you get it? Could someone else not get it? Could someone else not be hired? Could someone else not get their salary doubled? Just what field is this PhD in anyhow?

    5. Re:Also doesn't account for conversion by a1englishman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I disagree. I came to the US 13 years ago. I had just finished a PhD, which gave me certain specialized knowledge that my boss couldn't find in the US. However I didn't have much experience of programming to go with that knowledge.

      Truely, you've just argued my point. You were swindled, my freind -- taken adavntage of. If you had specialized knowlege that was highly valuable to to the complany, you should've been compensated appropriately. Just because you couldn't code at the time, is not an excuse. They needed the information/skills you were in posession of, yet you were not appropriately rewarded.

      I'd even argue that PHds, like yourself, should not be coding, unless you're building models. You should be sitting in a nice office, being allowed to think. Your brillant ideas should be documented, and handed down in understandable language for someone else to code or make applicaible use of.

      I say again, you were duped. Either you knew of this all along, or are in denial.

      Please don't take this as a flame. It isn't.

  102. And I suppose .. by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    And I suppose the H1-B fresh of the Bangalore express can write better???

    Jeero + Jeero = chree

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:And I suppose .. by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
      And I suppose the H1-B fresh of the Bangalore express can write better???

      Yes, they can.

  103. And they're increasing H-1b's by 50% now. by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    CNet reports:
    A spending measure approved on Thursday by the Senate Judiciary Committee will boost the number of H-1B visas for highly skilled guest workers by about half--from 65,000 to 95,000.
    1. Re:And they're increasing H-1b's by 50% now. by DocBones · · Score: 1

      Americans who oppose this should contact your Senators and Congressperson and let them know, preferably by phone.

      They are afraid of public pressure. This is being done as stealth as possible with little news coverage in the major papers, and being hidden in some big budget bill.

      I saw a recent survey where 84% of the people responding said the U.S. Government is not doing enough to protect American jobs from going overseas. If people really understood that they are bringing in foreigners to take the jobs here they would be real upset.

      The American establishment is greatly in favor of this program and tries to sneak it thru. Politicians want to curry favor [no pun intended] with corporations so they get those lovely no-work Corporate Board seats when they retire.

      In his last years with AOL, e.g., Alexander Haig, former Secretary of State, was pulling down about $30 million a year in stock option grants. More recent board members included Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice, until called away by higher duties.

      H1-B is the single biggest reason that India and other countries are now competive with the U.S. in software, they certainly didn't used to be. The program is damaging to U.S. interests, economic and security, but great for foreign interests and the corporate owners who want to hire the cheap labor, here and abroad, and want to spread their influence into India, China, etc.

      There are a few little problems with spreading the high-tech / SUV culture everywhere, like vicious wars [probably China], and Global Warming.

      Incidentally, this latest H1-B increase was apparently caused by a huge lobbying effort by Microsoft, and Congressional staffers have referred to it as the Bill Gates Act.

    2. Re:And they're increasing H-1b's by 50% now. by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      Incidentally, this latest H1-B increase was apparently caused by a huge lobbying effort by Microsoft, and Congressional staffers have referred to it as the Bill Gates Act.

      Don't you think this warrants a /. story?

      Put something together and submit it. Let me know how the submission goes.

    3. Re:And they're increasing H-1b's by 50% now. by DocBones · · Score: 1

      JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER
                                                by Rob Sanchez
                                    October 21, 2005 No. 1352
      ---

      Today I talked to Roy Beck of NumbersUSA to get some inside information about why the Senate Judiciary approved more H-1B and green card visas. He said the word is out in Washington DC that this was the result of intense lobbying by Microsoft. Last week lobbyists from Microsoft went to every Congressional office to lobby for more visas. Some people on Capitol Hill are actually referring to the Senate proposal as the "Bill Gates" bill.

      ---

      My source for the "Bill Gates Act" is this "Job Destruction Newsletter," sent out to a free e-mail list by Rob Sanchez. Although the Newsletter is archived at his web site:

      http://www.zazona.com/

      This recent one is not there yet.

      Rob got his information from Roy Beck:

      http://www.numbersusa.com/index

      Prof. Norman Matloff of Univ of Calif.

      http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/itaa.html

      also sent this information out to his free e-mail list.

      I consider all of these people reliable and well-informed, in contrast to the pro-industry propaganda found in MSM [Main Stream Media].

      I can't suggest stories to /. since they apparently dump all attempted contributions from Win XP users, a bug that is not being addressed currently according to their bug list. - The wrong way to attack Microsoft, IMHO.

      I would be grateful if you or someone would attempt to post this info, and even more the following time-critical info [e-mail from Norm Matloff: ]

      ---

      To: programmer mailing list

      I urge you to call and express your opinion, pro or con. (Obviously I support Byrd on this issue.)

      Yes, CALL. And make sure you talk to someone who handles immigration, NOT whoever answers the phone.

      The sample message below is far too complicated. CONGRESS DOESN'T CARE ABOUT REASONING OR LOGIC; all they understand is pressure. Keep your message short, just a couple of sentences. But make sure they understand that you feel STRONGLY about this issue.

      Norm

      ----- Forwarded message from Sandra Gunn

      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:15:55 -0800 (PST)
      From: Sandra Gunn
      Reply-To: Sandra Gunn
      To: matloff@cs.ucdavis.edu
      Subject: URGENT ALERT! Senate Voting Tommorrow on Amdt to Stop Foreign Worker/Immigration Increase

      URGENT ALERT FROM FAIR!

      Senate Voting Tomorrow on Amendment to Strip Foreign Worker/Immigration Increase from Deficit Reduction Bill

      Call your Senators Immediately and Urge a YES Vote for the
      Byrd Amendment

      THIS JUST IN...Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV) has decided to offer an amendment tomorrow to the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005 (S. 1932) that will strip out language added by the Judiciary Committee that sells out American workers by expanding employment-based visas, H-1B high tech worker visas and accompanying family members by an estimated 368,000 per year.

      PLEASE CALL YOUR SENATORS IMMEDIATELY AND URGE A YES VOTE FOR THE BYRD AMENDMENT.

      This will come up tomorrow, so we have less than 24 hours
      to make an impact. If you call during business hours, ask to speak with or leave a message for the legislative assistant handling immigration. If calling after business hours, please leave a message on your senators' voicemail.

      Call the Capitol
      Switchboard (202-224-3121) and ask to be connected, or find direct phone numbers on our web site at

      http://capwiz.com/fair/dbq/officials/

  104. I don't see this as a bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this bad? Companies want cheap labor, and we want to keep jobs in america. The US still gets tax money, the H1 employee still pays rent, car payments, groceries and generally keeps money in the US ecconomy. Sure they are going to take some american workers jobs, but hey, you know what? I work with several engineers who come from the middleast and asia, and they do a DAMN good job, and write damn good code. And, yes, maybe the do get a little less, but the ones I know plan on going back to their country some day (for the most part), and when they do, they're going to be very, very well off comparatively. No one is making them come to the US, they do it because it's a wonderful opportunity for them. If they really do write good code, they'll probably get raises.

    The thing that I /do/ have a problem with is if a H1 visa candidate was good enough to get a job in the US and was not fired (laid off, company goes out of business, etc) then they should have 1-2 years to find another sponsor. The company I work for was recently aquired and the H1 visa employees were basically put into the position of accept the job or you have 1 WEEK to get new employment before you're sent packing. That's not right. These are good men and women who work hard and should not be treated in such a disrespectful way. It's on thing for them to accept a job for 50k and come here to work, its another to say take this job or you go home.

  105. Oh yeah what happens when ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Oh yeah ...

    What happens when the Chinese and Indians finally figure out that they don't NEED those milionaire suits in New York???

    What happens when the US runs out of financial reserves and Beijing decides to stop buying US Treasury bonds????

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Oh yeah what happens when ... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      What happens when the US runs out of financial reserves and Beijing decides to stop buying US Treasury bonds????

      Current US Treasury debt as a percentage of GDP is not at unprecedented levels, but certainly it cannot continue to grow at the same rate it has been recently.

      The Chinese banking and financial industries are currently highly state-owned and screwed-up. The savings glut of China is significantly responsible for high US current account deficits. This is what leads to the odd situation of a developing country lending to a developed one.

      As Chinese financial institutions are modernized (and opened to foriegn competition, i.e. those millionaire suits from New York), we can expect that investment will rise in the reverse direction, that is, from America back to China. This will lead to savers in the industrial countries earning higher returns and enjoying increased diversification through investments in China, and borrowers there would have the funds to make the capital investments needed to promote growth and higher living standards.

      This could raise interest rates, but the enhanced return in investments should negate inflationary losses.

  106. Before you complain . . . by solareagle · · Score: 1

    I bet people raging against the "unethical" hiring of H1B's for less all behave the same way in other areas of life. All these companies are doing is what we all do when we buy something - look for the best deal we can get. Is it "unethical" for me to buy a PC with IC's made in Taiwan, where wages are lower for the fab workers, because it is cheaper than one made all in the US? Some people would probably say so, but how many /. ers complaining about low H1B wages wrote their post on a Taiwanese computer while drinking coffee grown and picked in Brazil and wearing a shirt made in China? Unless you are ready to put your money where your mouth is and start buying 100 % Made In The USA products regardless of the quality or cost, don't criticize the companies for taking the best deal available for labor.

    1. Re:Before you complain . . . by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      Youdo realize neither we nor the emplyees of the companies expericance these savings. It's the compnay itself that just gets

    2. Re:Before you complain . . . by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      That's somewhat of an apples-to-oranges comparison. You're equating manufacturing jobs to IT jobs, which are not the same thing.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    3. Re:Before you complain . . . by solareagle · · Score: 1

      Of course manufacturing jobs are not the same as IT jobs, but why should the rules be any different for one than the other? Are you suggesting IT workers have more rights than manufacturing workers?

  107. hidden benefits of visa workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stateside workers pay rent, buy food, have taxes withheld from their paycheck, and buy consumer goods. Although the pay is lower, the economic value of them working in the US has a strong multiplier effect.

    Now, on the other hand, outsource the job entirely and the cost per engineer is much lower, and there is no multipler - no rent income, no food sales, no taxes, etc.

    So as long as trained engineers are available at lower-cost, I'd rather seem them brought over stateside and at least get some leverage then completely outsourcing and getting no pull through.

    The first time the issue of visas became controversial and the government started limiting the number of workers and not raising the limits, guess what happened?

    Companies started outsourcing and finding out it was a LOT cheaper to just send to the work "over there" instead of bothering to bring the workers "over here" - and they don't forget! That was the start of the big outsourcing switch and it was caused by the strict limits on visas forcing companies to find another way. The visa limits backfired; they didn't make companies pay a higher wage or higher more US workers - it just encouraged them to move offshore faster.

    Sure as an individual engineer it sucks to have this unfair competition, but in the macro-economics, it is better to have the pull-through than nothing at all.

  108. Is this really a surprise? by jupiter_ganymede · · Score: 1

    My first reaction to this article has to be "Duh!". This should not be surprising to anyone who as been in the industry for any length of time. I find it incredible that companies can get away with complaining that they need H-1Bs to fill all of the positions that they have open when there are so many American workers looking for work. What they really mean is that they can't find any CHEAP labor to do the work. That our representatives in congress can't or won't see through this should not be a surprise since they rely on all of the companies that get the H-1Bs for their campaign contributions. Meanwhile, the average American worker gets screwed.

  109. So why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...would any company hire anyone BUT an H1-B? They seem to work much cheaper.

    Or is /. being 'swindled' in a different manner than the Infoworld article suggests?

  110. $500k wouldn't get you a starter home in my county by Tetravus · · Score: 1

    I live in the southern part of Silicon Valley, where the median cost of a home is $750K. If I had a family with just one child I couldn't stay where I am on the $53K figure you mention, and forget about ever buying a house.

    In most cases, wages are driven directly by the cost of living in an area not by employee greed. And the cost of living in California is very high. That's why these low wages for H1B workers are such a concern. They may set an artificially low ceiling on entry level jobs in the sector. So we won't get any local recruits for those positions, then in 5 years we won't have any mid-career programmers here because we hired temps from overseas. In 15 years all our senior engineers will be looking to retire and there won't be anyone to replace them, so all the work will have to be sent overseas and the US's strategic advantage in software will have been completely destroyed.

    Of course, if you own enough stock you have no worries right?

  111. H1B companies are "Stuck on Stupid" by mycal · · Score: 0

    Been there done that. In my experiance the cheap H1-B's reduce productivity not expand it. But to the bean counters quarterly spreadsheet it looks good.

    There are a few H1-B's that I've known to be very sharp, but they are few and far between.

  112. Geography correction by saha · · Score: 2, Informative
    HKG is in China

    Hong Kong is not in China contrary to what you have heard . Hong Kong borders China and is not fully part of China until 2047. In 1997 the British started the hand over process to the Chinese, where the next 50 years the one country - two systems policy is being implemented. Hong Kong is designated SAR, which stands for Special Administrative Region. If you go to Hong Kong they will give you a free tourist visa at the airport and then if you try to cross over to China's border you'll probably need to buy a visa if you are American or citizen of several western countries due to diplomatic reciprocity fees. The American State Department also makes the distinction between China and Hong Kong SAR.

  113. "Free" Markets by Vicissidude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rather than say, "Hey, you're trying to pay less for programmers!" we should be saying "Hey, are we getting paid too much? Are we pricing ourselves out of positions?"

    No. Any cheap work that could be done overseas is already being done overseas. The work that's left in the US would stay in the US regardless of what pay programmers demand. So, companies can only reduce the amount they pay in wages by artifically increasing the workforce and reducing the demand for high-skilled workers.

    This has nothing to do with "free" trade in labor and everything to do with market manipulation. These companies do not want to deal with the free market as it's currently structured. So, instead of dealing in the free market, they'd rather redefine the labor market in their terms.

    These companies would rather have completely open borders in the US where everyone from everywhere could freely enter. We've already heard Bush say exactly that. Labor costs in the US would plummet. So would the standard of living, but companies and the current administration don't actually care. The only reason they don't push that through now is that they've been pounding security for the last four years. Also, the majority US citizens, both Democrats and Republicans, don't want any more foreigners entering the country to take away jobs. If anything, people want the foreigners to leave so we could actually get some work and decent pay raises around here.

    1. Re:"Free" Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "These companies would rather have completely open borders in the US where everyone from everywhere could freely enter."
      That would kind of be the definition of "free market" any market that doesn't fit that description would be a "non-free market".

      "Labor costs in the US would plummet. So would the standard of living, but companies and the current administration don't actually care."
      Well duh.

      "Also, the majority US citizens, both Democrats and Republicans, don't want any more foreigners entering the country to take away jobs. If anything, people want the foreigners to leave so we could actually get some work and decent pay raises around here."
      Pretty much not going to happen with capital growth being the goal for everything these days. It's just too damn ineffective to pay some people several times the average wage just because they happen to be born in a specific place.

      The good news is that the world as a whole will get a standard of living. The bad news is that USian programmers will have to settle for being in the economic top .01% of the world instead of the .005. Excuse me for not shedding any tears.

    2. Re:"Free" Markets by Vicissidude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Me: These companies would rather have completely open borders in the US where everyone from everywhere could freely enter.
      You: That would kind of be the definition of "free market" any market that doesn't fit that description would be a "non-free market".


      The idea that the US labor market is not currently free is pure rubbish. Companies are free to hire any worker in the market who they want. And workers are free to work for whatever company in the market that they want. Further, the fact that companies may not hire just anyone from outside the US market and bring them to the US to work does not mean the US labor market itself lacks freedom. That is a discussion for immigration law, not "free market" labor.

      What we have here are companies attempting to re-define the market to their advantage. That is the definition of market manipulation.

      Me: Also, the majority US citizens, both Democrats and Republicans, don't want any more foreigners entering the country to take away jobs. If anything, people want the foreigners to leave so we could actually get some work and decent pay raises around here.
      You: Pretty much not going to happen with capital growth being the goal for everything these days. It's just too damn ineffective to pay some people several times the average wage just because they happen to be born in a specific place.


      You must not be from the US. We happen to be a democratic republic. Our representatives do what we want. And if we want them to cut immigration and enforce existing immigration laws, then they better do it. Otherwise, they will be next in the unemployment line.

      The good news is that the world as a whole will get a standard of living. The bad news is that USian programmers will have to settle for being in the economic top .01% of the world instead of the .005. Excuse me for not shedding any tears.

      I knew you weren't American. Any American programmer knows they're not in the top .01% amongst the likes of Bill Gates, aka richest man in the world.

    3. Re:"Free" Markets by Gruneun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These companies do not want to deal with the free market as it's currently structured.

      If you're requiring a certain structure, it ceases to be a free free market. What you're attempting to do is prop up the economy by limiting the number of competent workers that can come in and work here. This mindset has failed miserably in the past. It happened to the textile industry. It happened to the steel industry. It's happened to the automotive industry. Now, it's hitting the IT industry. The standard of living will go down (or, more likely will remain stagnant until the rest of the world catches up). You simply don't get it. It will happen and there isn't a damn thing that you can do about it.

      * You can blame evil corporations all you want. There isn't a single one that can steer a global market. They aren't looking at controlling things. They're worried about survival in a future that you are incapable of picturing.

    4. Re:"Free" Markets by tpr · · Score: 1

      > If anything, people want the foreigners to leave so we could actually get some work and decent pay raises around here.

      OK, white man, where are you going to draw the line on what makes a foreigner? I say go back about 10,000 years and kick out anyone whose direct ancestors weren't here by then.

    5. Re:"Free" Markets by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Idiot! This country and the corporations that control it are simply importing poverty. Can't you even read, moron?

    6. Re:"Free" Markets by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      What, are we playing finders keepers? Why don't we go back about 20,000 years and kick out anyone whose direct ancestors weren't here by then.

      That's a bullshit argument if I ever saw one. It ignores the changes of the last 500 years. And it ignores the fact that the United States is a legitimate government that can legitimately decide who enters and who doesn't. And no, that did not originally include Native Americans.

    7. Re:"Free" Markets by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      If you're requiring a certain structure, it ceases to be a free free market.

      A free free market? What the hell is that? It sounds like you are the one promoting a certain structure, especially one that is different from the current structure.

      And yes, despite the fact that we are a free market, there is a structure to our market. There are rules and laws to follow. That is true of any society outside of pure anarchy, which you seem to promote by your definition of "free". Those rules cover who gets to participate and who doesn't. That includes rules regarding immigrants. That does not mean the market lacks freedom.

      What you're attempting to do is prop up the economy by limiting the number of competent workers that can come in and work here.

      I'm not "attempting" anything. I'm describing the market as it currently exists.

      What corporations are attempting to do is manipulate the market structure to suit their own ends. They are re-wording a change in immigration law to make it sound like a free market move. They know that no one wants to increase immigration, but that quite a few people like the idea of free markets. They are the ones attempting to prop up their wallets at the expense of Americans and the American standard of living.

      This mindset has failed miserably in the past. It happened to the textile industry. It happened to the steel industry. It's happened to the automotive industry. Now, it's hitting the IT industry.

      Bullshit. We are talking about immigration. That's people and lives, not products and business. Your analogy does not hold.

      The standard of living will go down (or, more likely will remain stagnant until the rest of the world catches up). You simply don't get it. It will happen and there isn't a damn thing that you can do about it.

      I have a bachelors in business as well as a bachelors in computer science. I get it all too well. And no, it is not inevitable that our standard of living will stagnate. As I said previously, there are a certain number of jobs that companies will never outsource. If we keep foreigners from taking those jobs, then our wages will stay where they are or improve. Companies will still make huge profits and they'll have to pay their fair share for American workers.

      You can blame evil corporations all you want. There isn't a single one that can steer a global market. They aren't looking at controlling things. They're worried about survival in a future that you are incapable of picturing.

      No, this has nothing to do with survival. These corporations are making huge profits even now. No, this has to do with improving the bottom line a little more so that top executives can give themselves another million dollar raise.

      Why you want to defend these people is beyond me. For one, they didn't ask for nor need your help. For another, they'd just as quickly get rid of you, your job, and everyone else's job if they could.

      You are naive to think that corporations do not want to control things. There are mountains of evidence that suggest otherwise.

    8. Re:"Free" Markets by Gruneun · · Score: 1

      Idiot! This country and the corporations that control it are simply importing poverty. Can't you even read, moron?

      I think the ability to convey an opinion throught text, regardless of the subject matter, would indicate that I am quite capable of reading. Reading is generally a prerequisite to writing.

      H1-B visas aren't generally used for fruit pickers and gardeners. Quite frankly, the H1-B holders I know are usually much better-educated than their American counterparts and they seem to be doing just fine. I would hesitate to call some of them middle-class, as most middle-class Americans would be thrilled to have their salaries (and they earn them). When I see unsubstantiated statements like yours, emphasized with childish name-calling, it leaves little wonder that sometimes we have to go outside of the country to get reasonable employees.

  114. I didn't come cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Prevailing wage (which is the mimimum an H1-B worker is supposed to be paid, so as not to depress wages for American workers) for my line of work here is $93k. I'm on track to make $107k this year, and that does not include awards of stock for good performance valued at another $8k.

    Add to that the cost of importing me (over $20k just for moving expenses and a $10k signing bonus), exporting me if I'm let go, and other legal paperwork (as well as current LC and eventual LPR (green card) sponsorship), and I come at a fairly high price, compared to an American. I'd think my employer would have preferred to find such an American (and they constantly try -- the LC standard is that no American can be found to full the job after a national search), but failed.

    No doubt there are employers that break the law and under-pay H1Bs, force them to pay their own immigration lawyers, etc. Perhaps if they were properly prosecuted the rest of us could stop looking over our shoulders.

  115. Growth surged ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Productivy growth DOES NOT EQUAL percapita real income growth.

    Sorry, Nice try!

    go look at growth from 1939-1971.

    Back when unions where strong !!!! Before Nixon/Reagan/Bush regime.
    Back when America was a determined, fiesty Republic, not a confused Empire.

    1. Re:Growth surged ? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      Productivy growth DOES NOT EQUAL percapita real income growth.

      The heck it doesn't - nothing else drives per capita growth in a positive direction while a population is increasing!

      Arnold Kling is author of Learning Economics. From his article at TCS: "Labor productivity is perhaps the most important statistic in the economy. Over time, output per worker is what drives wage rates and the standard of living."

      "Technological innovation is what drives productivity growth. Kurzweil argues that the rate of technological innovation is doubling every decade, which to me would imply that the rate of productivity growth will double every decade. If annual productivity growth was 3.5 percent in the decade ending in 2005, then it will be 7 percent in the decade ending in 2015 and 14 percent in the decade ending in 2025. By that time, productivity would be more than 7 times what it is today. Thus, if average income per person is $35,000 today, then it will be over $250,000 per person (in today's purchasing power) in 2025."

    2. Re:Growth surged ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      didja check out the growth rate when unions where strong?

      didja? 1939-1971. check it out.

      growth was HIGHER !!!!

    3. Re:Growth surged ? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Except it won't- because American employers have a tendency to take the increased profits from increased productivity and give the C-level executives bonuses and the stockholders dividends instead of sharing that money with the workers.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  116. like h1a's by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    My wife is an H1A nurse from the Philippines. Well, used to be, she's a citizen now. Anyway, she came over here long before I met her and worked for a company that "sponsored" her.

    The company was a nursing home that was staffed almost entirely by foreign nurses that were being paid below the prevailing wage. Their problem wasn't in attracting nurses, it was simply that they wanted to pay less.

    This same home had a fire a year or two ago that killed some patients, and it turned out that they didn't have sprinklers.

    My observation of the medical industry is that facilities don't want to pay what nurses require, so they end up hiring foreign nurses if they're lucky. If they're not lucky, they end up paying twice what they'd pay a staff nurse to get someone from an agency.

    Anyway, this is a two-sided issue. On one side, my wife started making more when she met me and I told her to simply ask for more money. She went to one place where they offered her $13/hour (with 7 or 8 years of experience at the time). Not surprisingly, she ended up working there through an agency for $35/hour at one point. God only knows what they were paying the agency for her time, probably more than $13/hour.

    In the Filipino culture, it would be disrespectful to ask for more money of an employer, so they end up hurting over here. I mean this literally, the thought never crossed my wife's mind to ask for more money until she'd met me. Even then, it took a lot for her to get over it. The difference in pay is very significant.

    Now, the other side. She was making PHP15K/month as a nurse when she left the Philippines. In US dollars, that's about $300. Actually, less now due to exchange rates. In terms of cost of living, that would be below the poverty line here. Even the $13/hour would be big bucks. It's all a matter of perspective.

    Anyway, a lot of people are just happy to have a job, something we often lose site of here in the US. Still, there's no excuse for screwing people. And paying somebody less for the same work just because they won't complain is immoral.

    It's also illegal. The Dept. of Labor has standards for H1A and H1B, and the workers are (by law) to be paid the same wages as an American. Of course, you can't legally hire them if an American is available to do the work, either.

    I can't complain, I have a beautiful wife because of H1A.

  117. H1B Visas by horsepalyer · · Score: 1

    There should be only 1 visa type. People should not come in based on Job description. What we are doing is giving the store away. There are a lot of H1B's who come to learn then take it home. H1B's come not just as programmers but scientists as well. How do their countries feel about patents? The US corporations are selling out our country with H1B's, illegal immigrants and out-sourcing to make money. No one better complain when Iran has nukes, China and India has a bigger military , and business engine than us. In a couple years India, China, US, Europe will be fighting over oil. It will be too late but that's when the public will realize that the politicians and corporations sold us down the drain.

  118. No such thing as just a "shortage" by gisborne · · Score: 0

    Supply and demand: In a free market, there is no such thing as a "shortage". A company willing to pay enough can hire as many programmers of whatever quality they wish. You only get a "shortage" if you try to hold something different to the market-clearing level. In this case, it seems that companies want to get programmers for below-market-clearing wages. What a shock.

  119. for 53000 I'll work extra hours free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For 53k a year I'lll work extra hours for free with out any doubt.
    If you consider that the average salary for an IT profesional with certifications is 12660 a year in Colombia, you'll know why I'll work extra hours for free with that kind of salary.

  120. damned government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they oughta tax the shit outta companies that hire H1-B over american employees..
    my .02

  121. Re:I don't mean to sound ignorant or anything, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well..H1B workers do pay taxes ( even social security.. which will never be useful to them as they can only work here for 6 years).

  122. Re:H-1B and abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some time ago there was a slash dot discussion about the "Worst place to work". One of the companies nominated was a company called [name deleted out of fear]. They were nominated on the basis of a remarkable letter that the president of the company has posted on the [name deleted] web site. The president basicly describes a job that requires a great deal of skill, long hours and low pay.

    Who would take such a job? Especially because the company president seems like a maniac. Even he notes at the end of his infamous letter that he "might" sound like an "asshole".

    The only answer I can come up with as to "who would work there" is H-1B visa holders from countries where what in the United States is considered an unpleasant working environment is more accepted. In fact the company makes a big deal of the fact that they will pay H-1B visa fees. As far as I can tell, most of the staff are H-1B visa holders.

  123. H1b holder here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm an H1b. According to what the blurb says an average american programmer makes, I make more. One of my best buddies is another H1b, I know he makes close to six figures. We're both programmers. I've been here for about 2 years, this is my first job out of university. My buddy has been here for four years, he is on his second job in the US. Neither one of us would sell ourselves cheap.

    In order to get an H1b for an employee, the employer has to show how much he is going to pay this employee and whatever authority it is that approves or denies H1b applications makes sure this is a valid pay for the job.

    In order to get me over here, my employer also hired lawyers to navigate the INS minefield, paid $2000 extra for fast track processing (3 weeks, instead of six months) and bought me a ticket.

    I pay taxes, I contribute to my company's profits, I did not cost a dime for the US to educate, I will most likely not be here when it's time to retire. In that sense, your country is getting a great deal. But I'm certainly not here because I'm cheaper than an american programmer.

  124. on which basis by matu4251 · · Score: 1

    I work in the silicon valley in a big tech company. I am under H1B, like most of the people in my team... Like in my previous company it is really really hard to find good people: american or not. I'm pretty sure the silicon valley couldn't exist or wouldn't be what it is now without people coming from abroad. As for the salaries... not sure where the guy who wrote the article got the numbers, certainly not at the companies I've been working at. As for the skills... The usa have an history based on immigration ever since its creation. Which generation are you? 2nd, third, ... would you have refused your grand parents on Ellis island?

  125. Way more, nothing to see here by drix · · Score: 1

    I wrote my senior honors thesis in economics on this exact subject--the effect of H-1B visas on labor outcomes--and the results aren't nearly as clear cut as this guy is making them out to be. For one thing, there are no reliable data on H-1B entries or employment. You can get a database of LCA filings from the Department of Labor, but it is really noisy because there are hardly any rules for the employers who are filing. There's no guarantee the visa was ever issued, or the person ever took the job and immigrated. You can file one LCA for 4 people, or you can file 10 for the same guy. Because it's so easy to file many times, of course employers have an incentive to start low and work up when it comes to prevailing wage declarations. Also I remember someone at Labor telling me the entire LCA certification process is "a joke", so I'd be really hesitant to place a lot of faith in anything actually contained on them. Also, I can't find any link to the report on the Programmers' Guild website, but I'd be curious to know if those means were statistically different given all the variation I observed in the underlying data when I was looked at it.

    Rather that examining what the LCAs were claiming, I took the different tack of treating them as simply a crude measure of demand for foreign workers. I built a panel dataset over MSAs and quarters and could not uncover any statistically significant partial effect of LCA filings on wages or employment, even when controlling for a bunch of other socioeconomic factors, endogeneity, and fixed effects.

    A better economist could certainly do more with this, but my adviser and I ultimately agreed that there is essentially no empirical evidence to support the claim that "H1B=bad", so often repeated on /. and elsewhere.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  126. anti-US mods??? by PW2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Since when does spelling on a weblog validate the competence of American workers?

    1. Re:anti-US mods??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it shows poor communi-ca-shun skillz

  127. Complete and utter bull. by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. You see theres more to this world than flipping burgers and writing video games. Flipping burgers requires basal knowlege, writing video games requires a good background (college) if you want to do it right. But for more specialized work you might just need that extra knowlege that comes from a masters or Ph.D.

    -everphilski-

  128. Average by maverick529 · · Score: 1

    By the time the H1-B's gain their experience they will get the green card and won't be counted for the statistics of H1-B. The average income of foreign nationals in USA in $88,000 per annum, while for americans its $51,000

  129. Prevailing wage by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    Actually H1B workers have to make 95% of the Prevailing Wage by law. Their employer sends a list of their credentials to the Labor Dept. for that, and they have to pay at least 95% of what the Labor Dept. says an American worker would make for the same job. If there's a problem, it's because the Labor Dept. is lying (or just uninformed) as to how much the job is worth in the area, not because the employer is underpaying them. Or it is possible that the other programmers are all overpaid what they're worth :)

    1. Re:Prevailing wage by skipperjohn · · Score: 1
      Employers get around the prevailing wage rules by redefining the job title or description sleightly so that there are no workers already doing the redefined job. Then they can pay almost anything they want for the redefined job, and it becomes the prevailing wage for that redefined job.

      I don't think any employers have ever been prosecuted for hiring workers that do not work at the "prevailing wage".

  130. H1B workers tend to be younger by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    Nice study.

    Would it be surprising to find that recent college graduates make less than programmers by average? Not really. So why is this study comparing H1B worker salaries to the industry average when it's commonly known a large majority of H1B workers are younger, and a lot of them recent college graduates, and with less experience than the industry average and would naturally make less money than the industry average?

    They should've really hidden their bias a little better. But I'm sure this "study" will get widely quoted by blowhards like Lou Dobbs with no fact checking whatsoever. Infoworld appears to already have done so. Well done!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  131. There are many more H-1B workers about to come by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    There is a mandate for each congressional committee to come up with some savings to compensate for such brilliant expenditures as Alaska's bridge to nowhere. So the Senate Judiciary Committe has recently passed a proposal that will make them some money while satisfying their corporate masters. Businesses will be able to buy hundreds of additional green cards and H-1B visas to keep their labor costs low http://www.numbersusa.com/hottopic/H1B.html.

  132. There IS a way by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    by means of share-holder's resolution. Check out this article below.

    http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/co rporate_governance/MediaMen
    tions/WSJ_Winning_Apr.11.2005.pdf

    If ALL sharesholders demand this of their CEOs, then there would be no excuse about needing to pay up for talents.

    1. Re:There IS a way by odin53 · · Score: 1

      Under many states' corporations laws, some shareholder resolutions can't be binding on the company's management (if such a resolution is drafted as binding, it's considered not a proper subject for action and can be excluded from consideration at a shareholders' meeting).

      Capping CEO pay is probably one type of shareholder resolution that can't be binding. (Indeed, the article you link to mentions Morgan Stanley's recent consideration of such a shareholder resolution; that resolution began "The shareholders urge the Board of Directors...")

    2. Re:There IS a way by uncqual · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately the link does not work, but I assume this is some shareholder proposal to limit income of top execs and will work on that assumption...

      A shareholder may have good reason to reject such proposals. A shareholder wants the best talent at the top. Why would a shareholder want the CEO who would work the cheapest rather than the one that was most effective (and therefore in most demand and could demand the most money). It makes sense for shareholders to push measures that structure exec compensation in a way to insure that iff the shareholders win (probably somewhat relative to an industry index), do the execs win. There is of course the problem that some shareholders want short term gains and some want long term growth - so there is no perfect exec pay plan that motivates the execs to benefit all shareholders.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    3. Re:There IS a way by Tungbo · · Score: 1

      True enough.

      But if a majority or even a large % of the shareholders demanded such a cap. The board members will probably go along rather than risk being kicked out by the shareholders. The problem is that many shareholders still think that they have to pay the most for the best CEO for this company even though there is no evidence that higher paid CEOs correlates with better performing stock prices. Thus, we get stuck in the Red Queen's race with no effective braking mechanism.

  133. No need for H1-B Workers in high tech industry by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of home grown qualified workers in the United States to fill our high tech needs. Companies that say they need H1-B's are lying and paying off their congressmen to get more H1-B's every year.

    1. Re:No need for H1-B Workers in high tech industry by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      Utter nonsense. The number of home-grown workers for really HIGH tech industries is not just low, it's ZERO. Today's US education system does not produce anything worth considering seriously in this field.

    2. Re:No need for H1-B Workers in high tech industry by skipperjohn · · Score: 1
      "Utter nonsense. The number of home-grown workers for really HIGH tech industries is not just low, it's ZERO. Today's US education system does not produce anything worth considering seriously in this field."

      When you use the term "Utter nonsense", you are discounting all the folks in the REALLY HIGH TECH industries that have been fired because those positions have been filled by H1B workers that the company's have brought in for lower wages.

      Funny how the US education system you are discounting produced the folks that were overwhelmingly responsible for creating and building the IT industry in the first place.

    3. Re:No need for H1-B Workers in high tech industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Utter nonsense. The number of home-grown workers for really HIGH tech industries is not just low, it's ZERO. Today's US education system does not produce anything worth considering seriously in this field.

      There is no shortage of qualified workers who are U.S. citizens. It is true that there are fewer people entering and graduating from CS programs in universities today but guess why... Yep, they have figured out that there is no future in CS because the H1B and L1 types are driving wages down. They are moving into other professions that haven't been hit as hard by the influx of H1B and L1 workers. So you see, it's not just that U.S. workers are getting hurt by H1B and L1 programs. It is the very future of the country itself that is being jepordized. Unless of course, you are comfortable with the idea of having to depend on foreign institutions to supply you with educated people.

  134. H1B maximizes US educational investment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am under the impression that many H1B visas are awarded to people who have already studied at American universities, but who wish to stay in the US.
    This seems like something that benefits the entire American society.
    Taxpayers have already supported the R&D through grants, etc. The country has been fortunate to attract the world's best and brightest to these programs.
    Why wouldn't we want them to stay in the US once they are even more valuable to the economy?

    The more interesting question would be whether this brain drain is too damaging to the Third World to be continually losing their best minds to the US.

    Luckily for those who are opposed to H1B's, many scientists and engineers are now staying away from the US as it has become less tolerant of other cultures.
    The recent book, "The Flight of the Creative Class," details how the US is shooting itself in the foot with its rising xenophobia.

    My advice to American technorati: become mobile yourself. The world is a big place and you might be needed elsewhere more than you are valued in the Homeland. Small money goes far in other countries.

    No reason you can't vote with your feet.

  135. H1-B sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that this article doesn't mention is a major bit of leverage that H1-B employment gives to employers: If the worker loses their job, they don't just lose their job -- they lose their visa sponsor. That means they can't stay in the US anymore and have to give up their house, community, and friends. That's a pretty big stick to wield over someone.

  136. Pervisity Just Beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given articles such as this, and the evidence that
    it presents, you would think that the powers that
    be would put a halt to the H1-B program. But it
    won't. What will happen is that various groups will
    shout about the injustice that is being done to
    these foreign workers who are brought here and
    then *exploited* by working for wages signifcantly
    below what U.S. citizens are paid. No, not one word
    will be spoken about he U.S. citizens who have lost
    not only a job, but essentially life as they knew it.
    Hands will be wrung and tears will be shed for the
    poor H1-B workers who have been exploited, but not a
    second thought to the U.S. citizens whose lives were
    thrown into termoil. So the cry and demand will go
    forth to bring H1-B wages up to that of the levels
    of workers who are U.S. citizens. And they will. So
    now you're thinking that if H1-B people are being
    paid the same as workers who are U.S. citizens then
    there really is no need for a H1-B program at all
    and we will be able to get things back to the way
    the used to be (no H1-B program). That's logical. But
    it isn't going to happen. Why? Because this IS NOT just
    about cheap labor.Not by a LONG-SHOT.It all has very
    much to do with the wonders of DIVERSITY. You see, up
    until recently, the racial makeup of U.S. engineering
    was 99.9% white. Uh-oh. You see, today, in the U.S.
    EVERYTHING and I mean EVERTYTHING is scrutinized in
    the light of diversity. Having any profession dominated
    by that many whites is taboo. It is a violation of a
    basic tenet of diversity and it must NOT be allowed
    to happen. H1-Bs currently allow corporations (which
    ARE diversity gonzo) the best of both worlds. They
    can get cheap labor and they can make amends to the
    gods of diversity by changing the racial makeup of
    engineering and making it a *lot* less white. This
    is their penance and salvation. Ah, you say, but how
    can corporations continue the benefit of cheap labor
    if they are going to have to pay H1-B workers more?
    Very simple, after they have made amends for their
    errors and given these workers raises you will see
    almost no wage growth in the coming decades. An
    endless stream of tech workers coming from the places
    afar will see to it that wages are held down. In
    the long run, the corporation wins.

  137. Thats still more than I make by fishlet · · Score: 1

    I'm still wondering where the money in these post-boom years. I've a programmer in New England for the last 6 years... and I still have yet to break out of the 40's. I don't know if it's poor salary negotation skills or what, but there seems to be very limited opportunities as to what I can do and what pay is available for these things. I'm a pretty decent Java,C* and .Net developer- but not quite advanced enough to do EJB, Websphere,etc apps. It seems like the really big stuff, you can't get into anyway unless you've apprenticed in it already under a big company somewhere.

  138. You don't need 90k by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    I was living in San Jose in 1999 on annual equivalent of $50k, living in a comfortable 2 bedroom apartment (with a roomate) and I could make payments on my small car. I even saved money.

    Could I support a family on that? No. If I had a live at home wife and 1 child, then yes, $90k would likely be a necessary salary.

    --
    -Stu
  139. which are you, a manager or a foreigner? by tomcres · · Score: 1

    I have 8 years of tech experiences, including 6 as an IT administrator/help desk specialist. I left my job to join the Army, got hurt in basic training. When I returned, I could not find tech work anywhere. I did Monster.com, I did CareerBuilder, I sent my resume to everyone, civil service, you name it. I did this for almost a year, no results. In the meantime, I had to work at Staples for $8/hour. Of course, it took me over a month just to get this job. I was so desperate, I was applying at McDonald's, local supermarkets, you name it because I was getting literally no calls back for any tech work other than temp jobs. I have a wife and kid and I wanted a permanent position. Eventually, I was able to get a $34k job through a temp agency, which ended up being a permanent position, but it is in a call center as a compliance investigator for a pharmaceutical company. I was discharged from the Army in June 2004. I used to make $63k working for the federal government in IT before I left. Now my wife has to work full-time at Taco Bell for $7/hr plus do weekend work as a home health aide for $8/hr just so we can keep up with all the debt incurred during the 9 months I was stuck with no job or with Staples.

    Don't tell me that H1B has no bearing on availability of jobs. I called the IT department at one place I used to work at to get a reference, and no one was still there from when I worked there (1997-1998). Every single name on the greeting was Russian or Chinese.

    I'm very well qualified, but not hireable because why would someone pay me $60k-70k when they can get someone who doesn't have the experience, but might have a little more education and get them to work for $40k-50k? It's simple economics.

    Think about this next time you vote Republican.

    1. Re:which are you, a manager or a foreigner? by Axe · · Score: 1
      get them to work for $40k-50k?

      And you agreed to work for $34K and/or $7/hr instead of 40K - 50K? Something does not add up.

      Cost saving for an H1B is a myth. It does cost upward of $10K a year in legal costs and fees. If you actually check salaries - you may find yourself surprised that those Chinese and Russian guys are actually making more then you thought. I know in our organization they do. And they were brought onboard because they make a better job. And if we were prohibited from hiring them, as you seem to wish, those jobs would have went to Beijing or Moscow.

      Face it you are not that good. Everybody who is actually good, not just with a padded resume, can find a job, and don't blame H1B for that.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    2. Re:which are you, a manager or a foreigner? by Rahga · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is voting Democrat going to convince anybody pay $60k to $70k IT for an "IT administrator/help desk specialist"? I can completely understand staying with a profession for 8 years when you've got a wife and kid, but you don't see a huge pay gap between entry-level and 8-year sweatshop workers or secretaries, so why should there be one for your job?

      I've seen a survey that points that average MCSA salary at $47k in 2003. If you don't like the market forces that play into that salary, feel free to move to your favorite communist or socialist nation.

      I'd probably question your experience, anyway... a /. uid of 925786? Pathetic! :)

    3. Re:which are you, a manager or a foreigner? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1
      I'm very well qualified, but not hireable because why would someone pay me $60k-70k when they can get someone who doesn't have the experience, but might have a little more education and get them to work for $40k-50k? It's simple economics.

      I had a similar problem during a period of unemployment in 2002. I can say that although the reply you received from one guy ("YOu're not that good") was ridiculous and over the top, you may want to consider your self-marketing skills. Even though we are currently (allegedly) in an "employee's" market you still have to be a really good fit for a company to hire you on.

      Consider a career coach. THey can do things like re-write your resume to optimize your chances of getting a call, or help you write cover-letters that are actually attractive to employers. It is really hard to admit you have a problem in this department--my own hard headedness made me waste at least two months because I wouldn't get help from a professional. She interviewed me and taught me a lot of things that got me hired fairly quickly afterwards. You cannot undervalue a good resume and good networking.

      Try starting an IT Guys Softball team or something... Invite guys from IT Departments you'd like to work for to play... or if you're in a high tech/high population area, talk to the park district about an "All Technology" softbball league. Hang out with the people you want to work with once in a while... NETWORK.
      --
      Who did what now?
  140. Solution: tax or auction HB1 visas by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Either tax them at a rate to more than cover the salary difference for that particular job, or auction them off on a weekly basis, with a "use it or lose it" clause meaning you have to have a candidate in mind and the visa is ONLY good for that particular candidate.

    After 3 years, make the company compete for a new auction and if they don't bid high enough the guy has to go home.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  141. and that's exactly why you _shouldn't_ be hired by tomcres · · Score: 1

    You contribute nothing to this country. You take the money and leave and bring your experience and money back to Europe. Meanwhile, poor Joes like us have to struggle unemployed or underemployed trying to keep our families fed, bills paid, and a roof over our heads so that we can live here!

    1. Re:and that's exactly why you _shouldn't_ be hired by Bake · · Score: 2, Informative

      An L-1 visa, just like any other visa, does not carry a mystical "tax free" stamp on it. L-1 visa holders pay their respective taxes just like everybody else. I for one, consider taxes to be a contribution society.

      In fact, the purpose of an L-1 visa is to be a temporary work permit for employees/managers so that companies can expand their operations, introduce new business methods, train new staff etc. in the US to fortify the company's future position within the US, thus benefitting the country in both the short and the long term.

  142. close the borders by tomcres · · Score: 1

    It really pains me to say this, since my wife is an immigrant from Angola. But I seriously think we need to close the borders. And we need to penalize (tax heavily) any company that has a presence abroad. Set high tariffs. Let's not subsidize the rest of the world anymore. They want us to consume, consume, consume. Well, two things here: A) If we don't have jobs, we won't have money to spend. B) If you want our money, then keep your business here, hire Americans, and contribute to our society rather than leeching from it. Do you think China would put up with this crap if they were in our position? Hell no! And we shouldn't either!

    1. Re:close the borders by Malc · · Score: 1

      I think you have it the wrong way around. It's the US that wants everybody home and abroad to consume, consume, consume. That's beside the point. If the US were to close its borders, I think you would find other countries would close their borders to US trade, or at least impose tariffs on US goods. Then the US won't be exporting so much and so won't be able to pay anybody at home. Same situation, perhaps worse. The US has a large enough population to have a self-sustaining economy, although the country will have to figure something out about water and energy resources. Even worse, if other countries find their trade with the US diminishing, then why would they continue to use USD$ as their reserve currency? The US government would probably default if the USD$ stopped being the main reserve currency of the world: then watch the USD$ nose-dive further, inflation shoot up and everybody's savings (people do have them, yeah, like 401K?) be wiped out. It's too late to turn the globalisation clock back, at least not without a massive readjustment that will cause a huge amount of pain for many Americans.

  143. Bill Gates' campus tour by jcdick1 · · Score: 1

    This is sort of related to how I see Bill Gates' recent tour of American colleges to promote CS degrees. He sees a shortage of CS workers and that we need more. How I see it, and it may be cynical but seems more realistic, is that he is trying to get IT workers who have American educations, American productivity levels, but at imported worker salary.

    --
    What?
  144. oblig. pointing out of mistakes in parent post... by Animaether · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree with you for the most part, but everybody makes mistakes.

    On the spelling front, for example, you misspelled the word "pity".

    On the grammar front you forgot an "a"; "I work with a couple of American". (Yes, that's with a capital "a", too.)

    Lastly, your first sentence would be more proper if it would read "Spelling and Americans ? You must be kidding me!!!" or "Spelling and Americans - you must be kidding me". The form in which you've written it now seems to indicate that you are saying "you must be kidding me" to both Americans and a person who goes by the name of "Spelling".

    --

    That said - who cares ? I've seen similar errors in letters written directly by CEOs (not passing through their secretaries/etc.) and even in press releases. It *would* be nice to hold everybody to a high standard to help keep it up, but I think it's far too late.

  145. And why would they need that capital ??? by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Why would they need that capital when we're pouring money into China via cheap manufactured goods???

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:And why would they need that capital ??? by TheSync · · Score: 1

      It isn't that they need cash from us, there is plenty of savings in China, the problem is that their financial systems is not advanced enough to efficiently funnel those savings into useful capital investments. It is happening to some extent now, but Chinese capital investment will accelerate rapidly as their banking and financial system becomes more modern and market-oriented.

      Currently the Chinese financial sector is mainly state-owned, loans are made on a political basis, and there are many non-performing (i.e. bad) loans outstanding especially to other state-owned industries.

  146. They're like the Beatles than ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    The Beatles had a thick British accent that virtually disappeared when they sung.

    Likewise, I'm sure that the butchered grammar of oh so many Indian and Chinese programmers just melt away when they translate it into the printed word. And I suppose the simple ability to converse and be understood in English is also over-rated???

    Jeerio!!!

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  147. why no H1Bs for nurses or truck drivers? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Especially nurses, there is hugh shortage of nurses.

    Actually, I know the reason why. The medical field is controlled, IT is not.

    1. Re:why no H1Bs for nurses or truck drivers? by JoeF · · Score: 1

      You know wrong...
      There is a special category (H1-C) for registered nurses.

  148. Your binary world ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    Well, taxes don't work EXACTLY like that. There are all kinds of things you can do with a W-2 form.

    Just remember, you do file those things called TAXES at the end of the year. If withholding took care of all of it, there would be no need for filing.

    For all you know oh so many H1-B are claiming EXEMPT status. And why wouldn't the companies go along with it??? They wouldn't have to match payroll taxes. And if the H1-Bs aren't filing, the IRS aren't going after them!!!

    But lets not mince words over H1-B taxation. Lets go wholesale for the LZ-1s that are more numerous for the simple fact that they are unlimited. LZ-1s aren't required to pay income taxes. So I don't know why any sane accountant would allow them to fill in a W-2 without making them check the EXEMPT box which would save the company even MORE money.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Your binary world ... by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      You are a moron. H1Bs are taxed. Worse yet, they cannot claim social security benefits.

  149. taxes contribute nothing.. by tomcres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course, you're probably used to the idea that in a socialist country, your taxes actually go towards contributing to society. Here in America, your paying taxes does nothing but offset tax breaks given to the wealthy, incentives for companies to do business abroad, and pursue a foreign policy of domination and world hegemony. In the meantime, most of us are forced to take jobs that we are overqualified for and underpaid at just to get some kind of health insurance for our families. After all, the poverty level is set ridiculously low in this country. You have to be almost penniless to qualify for any kind of government assistance (or super-rich, then the government will gladly throw tax breaks and incentives your way). There are days when I have actually had to miss work because I couldn't afford gas to put in the car because I spent it on food. I miss qualifying for food stamps by something like $2000 a year income. Think about that. Between my wife and myself, we have three jobs, and still every last penny we earn goes to pay rent, utilities, gas, and food. I am three months behind paying bills because we had some emergency medical and dental bills come up, and we have insurance! Only in America! Honestly, look at it from my perspective. I'd love to get a job in Germany and have all the benefits a German citizen would have while I'm there. And I speak better German than most guest workers in the US speak English! But it would never happen... it doesn't work like that. We are entirely too accommodating to other peoples of the world without any sort of reciprocation. We are being taken advantage of, and we are the ones hurting from it. Forget Germany for a second. Do you think that Chinese companies are going to try to hire out-of-work American programmers? And do you think the Chinese government is going to provide all the benefits of society to the American guest worker, including equal protection under the law, that America provides to its guests? No!! It's about time that we started demanding an even playing field on the world labor stage. American workers have a right to the same standard of living as European workers. And we also have the same right as the Europeans to keep foreigners from taking our livelihoods away from us. Excuse me if you think I'm being a little harsh on foreign workers. I don't mean to be. My wife is a very recent immigrant from Africa. The problem is not the foreign workers. The problem is America. And the H1B program is just one more symptom of a larger problem of America selling out its own people so that the elite can amass greater fortune.

    1. Re:taxes contribute nothing.. by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Yet you have a computer and an internet connection -- a sign of the high standards of living in the USA. Ironically, this standard of living has been maintained by drawing in talented individuals from around the world (the so-called brain drain). If the input of skill were removed, the US economy would gradually collapse, simply because there aren't enough educated/intelligent natives to support it. I see this every day in the US physics department I work in, where at least 80% of the grad students are foreign.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:taxes contribute nothing.. by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      I would *so* mod you up if I had any points left. You make some really really good points. And it's almost all of the reasons that I'm steadfastly AGAINST H1B hiring. Why the hell can't we educate our own kids so that we don't have to IMPORT foreign workers?? Why can't we pay decent wages for menial jobs so that Americans will do them, rather than pawning them off on 'migrant workers'? Because the damnable corporations again. I'm telling you.... they want to pay as little as possible, both in taxes and salary, so have no qualms about hiring illegal's under the table. I've seen it even in IT!!!! It's so disgusting.

      I'm worried as hell that my kids won't be able to support themselves as they grow up, because they are going to be so far behind. The only thing I can do is keep them out of public school and educate them the absolute best that I can, preparing them for competition against the world.

      I've also been thinking about working abroad, and then I talked to my neighbor who just got back from Austria. BUMP THAT! Not only do I have to pay the local taxes, I have to pay special taxes back to the US because I'm not contributing to the US Coffers! It makes me ill to know that all of my 42% tax bracket is going to fund SSI for people who are cheating the system (not really disabled, but so illiterate someone felt sorry for them and said they were 'psychological challenged" and gave them disability status), fat people who can't control what the hell they put in their face - TWINKIES ARE NOT HEALTH FOOD, or smokers who pollute the very air that I breathe!

      But what can we do? I live here, I live in the welfare capital of the Union - only here do illegals get welfare, I swear. Maybe in Florida, but I doubt it. I pay the taxes, I vote, and I bitch. That's my right, as I vote in *every* election - even next week's. :P The system is so big, change will take a long time. It has to start somewhere though. Jho

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
    3. Re:taxes contribute nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in agreement with you, I am an American sucker, I live in NYC and I am tired of working late, paying taxes and watching everyone else either work here to support people in their home countries or live Ghetto fabulous on our dime, [my 42% tax bracket is going to fund SSI for people who are cheating the system (not really disabled, but so illiterate someone felt sorry for them and said they were 'psychological challenged" and gave them disability status), fat people who can't control what the hell they put in their face - TWINKIES ARE NOT HEALTH FOOD, or smokers who pollute the very air that I breathe!]

      What the hell is going on here?

      "Come to America, work and then retire in their native land"

      Why can't you guys learn, teach and building your own shit.

      Maybe Rosa Parks was right!!! We should just boycott everything that's UNAMERICAN and see what happens.

  150. That's not true! by Ivan+Matveitch · · Score: 1

    Local governments can easily stop globalization. They can even introduce central planning and economic autarchy. (Globalization has no effect on North Korea's economy, for instance.)

  151. Wage Data Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work as a Case Manager in a business immigration law office. This article is, wittingly or not, promoting a kind of misinformation. Forgive a little dry explanation:

    It is (I assume) true that the OES prevailing wage surveys referenced in this fellow's study indicate that wages are higher for U.S. workers. I haven't done the OES's study myself, so I can only take that for granted. However, the OES numbers are rarely used when businesses and their attorneys are preparing an H-1B petition to send to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

    This is for the simple reason that more often than not, the OES numbers are inflated, due to their lack of specificity. The real question one needs to ask if you want to know whether foreign workers are being paid comparably to U.S. workers is how the data is gathered. As one poster pointed out, the OES numbers incorporate data from all over the professional spectrum, including ranges of titles, levels of managerial authority, job responsibilities, etc.

    To illustrate how important this question is to the issue, consider a company (Company A) who is preparing an H-1B petition for (say) a programmer-type who will be working on creating web-based business software that interacts with a decent-sized customer database. That job has responsibilities much more specific than simply "Computer Programmer," which is the main OES classification for a job like that. The OES information might include data about programmer-types who have nothing even close to the H-1B job's responsibilities in this little thought experiment.

    The way companies respond to situations like this is to not use the OES information, but to instead use what are called, "Alternate Prevailing Wage Surveys." These are wage surveys conducted by companies, individuals, etc. that also take data about a specific job in a specific geographic area. However, these surveys are often fine-tuned to gather data specific to a certain variable.

    For example, Company A is going to use an alternate prevailing wage survey that is fine-tuned to deal only with jobs like its H-1B job. This gives a much more fine-grained and accurate picture of what people doing a job like that are actually paid. Thus, the wage information it uses is better-suited to the task, and the wage it pays its H-1B alien is going to be at least the prevailing wage for jobs like its H-1B job.

    The bottom line is: this guy is concluding pretty heavy-handedly that there is widespread abuse of the H-1B program, and erroneously so. I'm not sure why that is - maybe he's a crypto-xenophobe. But suffice to say, he is not dealing with the data at the levels of detail that real businesses, real H-1B aliens, and real U.S. workers do. He's also got a great big megaphone that he is announcing his "findings" through, and that, my friends, is misinformation.

    1. Re:Wage Data Sources by Axe · · Score: 1

      What he said.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    2. Re:Wage Data Sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The "Study" was done by anti-immigrant loosers who are upset that their mad Pascal skilz don't have the cache they one had.

      I think people should look up their job on OES and see if what they are getting paid measures up. I know I don't. But my job is easy, and I have lots of free time!

  152. Amen, brother! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has been in the computer industry for more than a few months knows this. Its prevalent everywhere. Don't let them say "there aren't enough engineers to go around", thats pure horse hockey. HIB workers arre cheaper, plain and simple.

    H1-B workers also makes it easier to hire a few people with degrees from a handfull of ivy-league or otherwise exceptionally reputable (among suits) schools for core teams, people from India and the like for the bulk of the rest of the slots, and ignore anybody who's black, hispanic, female, and/or educated in a state college. (And claiming such are unqualified helps perpetuate the myth that there are no "qualified" applicants available, giving them an excuse to hire the cheaper H1-Bs.)

    Helpful hints:
      - Intelligence is not confined to people who were able to attend one of about three high-prestige schools, are male, and are white or oriental.
      - Technical expertese - especially in computer-related subjects - is not developed solely in a set of schools you can count on one hand with fingers left over.

    (For starters: the bulk of the actual rocket scientists have a southern or western accent.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Amen, brother! by Axe · · Score: 1
      For starters: the bulk of the actual rocket scientists have a southern or western accent.

      The bulk of the actual rocket scientists had a German accent. And a whole bunch of them have a Russian accent. You know - those folks who make engine that Lockheed buys after beeing unable to develop their own.

      I guess if it was up to you, Von Braun should have been allowed to enter this country, right?

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
    2. Re:Amen, brother! by ppanon · · Score: 1

      And more than a few of them also had Canadian accents, eh?

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  153. Free Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How Other Nations Handled Trade Competition

    Did the United States have any choice but to push for competition via free
    trade? Comparing U.S. trade policy with other nations' strategies is instruc-
    tive. Note that the fastest-growing economies in the world during the last
    three decades--namely, those in East Asia--quite consciously follow
    "strategic" trade policies. Japan, seeking to recover from the devastation of
    World War II, intentionally promoted certain industries through its
    Ministry of International Trade and Investment (MITI). Japan went from
    being a country of toy and gadget manufacturers to one that leads the world
    in technology and manufacturing, including most recently the first com-
    mercially successful hybrid automobiles.

    There are many reasons Japan was successful, but free trade is never
    one of them. For years, Japan has protected its domestic markets, especial-
    ly agriculture, while competing in world markets through strong promotion
    of its exports. The JETRO agency is an arm of the Japanese government
    whose main job is to help Japanese manufacturers market their products
    abroad. The Japanese tradition of "lifetime employment" and strong bond
    between company and employees was legendary, even if the relationship
    has dissipated in the wake of Japan's recession.

    The governments of South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan also pro-
    moted policies that boosted certain industries. Free trade did not determine
    that South Korea would enter the domestic and world automobile market;

    a partnership of government, large national champions, and heavy invest-
    ment in the country's workers did. The government of Singapore similarly
    has made strong efforts to educate its population and create a base of infor-
    mation technology firms, thereby taking that country from a dilapidated
    colony in 1960 to one that offers a world-class standard of living today.
    Taiwan also began to compete in producing personal computers when its
    government decided that this was a policy to pursue.

    The latest example of a country's pro-competitiveness policy is that of
    China, where the government keeps a tight lid on the level and types of for-
    eign investment and controls key sectors of its economy. China has policies
    to compete on all levels of manufacturing and the latest technologies. In
    sum, its trade policy coordinates various tools to increase national compet-
    itiveness, from promoting applied research links among institutes, students
    abroad, and national companies, to supporting an artificially low exchange
    rate for its currency. Most projections show that the largest and fastest-
    growing U.S. trade deficit is with China, and that imbalance of trade will
    not change after China enters the World Trade Organization. It is not free

    trade or the free market that has led to China's highest growth rates in the
    world. It is China's government policy to find ways to enter new markets.

    In short, several countries in the developing world now compete head-
    on with the United States in key industries ranging from steel to automo-
    biles. These countries have proactive economic policies to attract new
    industries and technologies, train workers, steal technology, and lure out-
    sourced jobs from the United States.

    By contrast, every man or woman in the United States is supposed to
    be uniquely responsible for his or her own fate; if a company downsizes, the
    employees somehow must find a way to survive. Yet, globalization and free
    trade agreements affect everyone in this economy but are outside most indi-
    viduals' control. How can each person be totally responsible for his or her
    fate when shortsighted government policies constrain their options?

    The Public Debate on
    Outsourcing Is Misleading

    The debate surrounding outsourcing has been framed in a singular
    way that is misleading: You are pigeonhole

    1. Re:Free Trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone should be focused on stopping outsourcing. it is NOT free trade. It is state-sponsored artificial support for businesses. H1B's cannot move from job to job or compete with US workers without the restrictions the US govt enforces, tying the workers to a corporation. They also cannot complain about bad treatment as freely as US workers.

      It ISN'T free trade, free competition. It's state-sponsored welfare for the US tech business. If US businesses had to hire US workers and compete for labor, everything would be better off

  154. Doesn't match personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came here via a H1-B and I was *always* treated fairly and earned a salary that matched by skillset. Sometimes I made more than my (citizen) coworkers, sometimes I made less. And I definitely make way more than the cited $73k avg. I'm from Europe and caucasian, so maybe that makes a difference, and folks from India or China are exploited more frequently; and my one case is certainly not representative.

  155. Thank you, Captain Obvious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newsflash: American companies may be hiring cheap labor when they think they can get away with it.

    Ric Romero should be reporting this.......

  156. Expensive executives. by Ivan+Matveitch · · Score: 1
    Executive pay is set by shareholders; the bosses themselves have no say in the matter. The very high price of a world-class boss is equal to his very great responsibilities. A good boss can lead shareholders to huge profits, but a bad boss might send them to the poor-house instead. Is it any wonder that they demand the best and are willing to pay for him dearly?

    The point is that some people are worth a little, some people are worth a lot, and an elite few people really are worth a complete and utter fortune on the market. There is little sense in pretending that this is not so, whatever you think of Robin Hood.

    1. Re:Expensive executives. by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Executive pay is set by shareholders; the bosses themselves have no say in the matter.

      Executive pay is set by the board, where board members tend to be executives in other companies. It's a big circle-jerk where they all raise each other's compensation to outrageous amounts. Occasionally a big shareholder will cry foul, but generally the perks are hidden in employment contracts that are not audited by the shareholders. Google "fortune magazine executive pay" for Fortune magazine's take on it all.

      In the 90's, CEO compensation rose 535%. The average salary rose 32%.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  157. eliminate the H-1B program by shinghei · · Score: 1
  158. H1-B ers only take jobs Americans won't do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise why would employers go through the hassle? /.ers opposed to the program sound like a bunch of KKK Minutemen.

  159. ah! an easy troll for a looong day! by efuseekay · · Score: 2, Funny


    I feel a bit tired today, so I decided to pick on an easy troll to squash, for my personal amusement.

    PhDs are granted for NOVEL research, dude/dudette. Someone with a PhD basically means he/she has knowledge in some (however esoteric) field that nobody else has.

    Ah! That feels better. Now back to the salt mines. /has a PhD. //is a H1B. ///long day.

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    1. Re:ah! an easy troll for a looong day! by thogard · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen your use of the word "Novel" is exactly the same as the way the USPO uses it.

  160. hackers need not apply by tomcres · · Score: 1

    Actually I've been posting on /. for years. I don't know why it took me this long to actually register. It never really bothered me being "Anonymous Coward". Actually, it's one of the things that drew me to /. because I always hate registering. :-) But you make an interesting point about MCSA salary being on average $47k (in 2003). The problem is that no one seems to care that I have years of experience as a NetWare/UNIX administrator. Because I don't feel like spending a couple thousand dollars to get the all-holy certification that puts those magic letters "CNE" or "CSA" next to my name, my resume probably goes right into the round file. It used to kill me years ago when I would go on interviews and potential employers would ask me if I had MCSE certification for NT 4.0. And I would ask them why I should spend my hard-earned cash to have some instructor with probably 3 months experience with Windows NT certify me in an operating system I have been doing installations and maintenance of since Advanced Server 3.1. I've been programming since 1981. I know just about every operating system that runs on an x86 processor inside and out (and quite a few that don't run on x86). The problem is that no one wants to hire a hacker. They want to hire alphabet soup! God forbid you should actually know what you're doing. It's more important that you pay into the system and shell out big bucks to Microsoft, Novell, Sun, et al. I've been hacking on Linux since the .99 kernel for crying out loud. I remember the fscking SLS distribution and how Patrick Volkerding started Slackware as an improvement upon SLS, back when your choices of Linux distro were basically SLS and TAMU or hack your own. Why on earth should I have to pay Red Hat money to get certified when I've been on Linux since before there was a Red Hat?! Actually, one of the things I probably had going for me at my government job was that they had an old VAX that everyone was afraid of that had been inherited from the previous administration. They seemed to like the fact that I actually knew my way around VMS. But I suppose that's probably a unique thing in the public sector. In the corporate world, they'd probably just shell out for a support contract from whoever Digital's successor is these days (Intel?) and have them deal with it rather than hiring someone in house to maintain it.

    1. Re:hackers need not apply by jmulvey · · Score: 1

      With 20 years in IT, I used to have the same attitude as you.

      Unfortunately, in most corporate environments what matters most is the ability to maintain IT operations (even in the face of staff changes). The fact that you're a whiz-bang in Linux is good, but will others be able to understand -- and build upon -- what you're done? Or are you the type who wants to be perceived as irreplaceable because nobody can understand how things work? Your post itself shows this attitude quite clearly: "Actually, one of the things I probably had going for me at my government job was that they had an old VAX that everyone was afraid of that had been inherited from the previous administration. They seemed to like the fact that I actually knew my way around VMS." You're fooling yourself if you think potential employers don't catch on to your disdain for those who question your credentials.

      I used to have the same attitude as you about the exams. Later, I got my MCSE, and was actually surprised to find that I had to learn a few things to pass the exam! "What useless crap", I told myself. Later, I'd come to realize that it was operational best practices (not "whiz-bang" best practice which is typically finding the coolest way to do something, and there's a difference) of which I was unaware.

      Today, I have my MCP, MCSE, MCSA, MCDBA, and MCT, as well as CCNA and Novell CNA. I've found they're well worth the effort to get, if nothing else than to short-circuit the whole question of my credentials with potential employers or tyrant consultants. Usually, the business of credentials comes up when someone wants to take you down a notch. Instead, you come off as the type who is just itching for a fight. Ask yourself this: Do you really want to fight, or do you want to solve problems? And if you want to solve problems, you should recognize that most problems you'll encounter are not technical problems, but people and organizational problems. And people and organizations like alphabet soup, because it gets the technical credentialing crap out of the way!

  161. Ought to stop H1Bs until hurricane people hired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US govt ought to stop all H1Bs until all the unemployed people from the hurricanes are employed.

    I was 'laid-off' from a US job, and the company hired a chinese h1b to do the job. They never tried to fill the job with a US citizen, and my layoff to hire an h1b was illegal.

    US companies are abusing the h1bs. they are indentured servants tied to the employer. We ought to stop all of them.

  162. and as long by waspleg · · Score: 1

    as they're both making 5 to 7x what i'm making i don't care.

  163. Hit it on the NOSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a top 100. We hire mostly H1's. The majority of which dont know even basic unix skills. Many have masters in non-IT fields and do mostly on the job training. Our hiring is done by mid-level managers or former H1s which need people to justify their existence. What amazes me is that it takes 2 years to do a project that when I worked in a telecom would take 4-6 months. But cost savings isnt a concern. THe company becomes more and more bloated by the day and the H1 by far out ways the skilled US worker(of any nationality).

  164. MTS1 vs MTS scam by shm · · Score: 0

    I used to work for a very large telecom company on the east coast. Several years ago, I think in the early 90s, they introduced an "entry" level position which they called MTS1. Most of the new hires in that grade where H1B holders. They had the same qualifications and did the same job as the MTS's. But they were definitely paid less.

  165. economy will pop under it's own weight by cecirdr · · Score: 1
    Gov't (local and national) have allowed runaway housing costs so they can cash in on property taxes or personally when local officials buy up property to sell off. Real estate firms love the "churn" and have every incentive to perpetuate the myth that houses appreciate so quickly. So, Americans have dealt with inflation on a large scale for years but indicies to measure it have been changed to not compute housing, food, autos, fuel and possibly not even education costs. On top of it gov't has allowed corporations to bring in cheaper foreign labor, thus displacing American workers.

    So, the major needs of life (housing, education, a car, fuel) are rising in cost faster than the inflation index says, while jobs are either vanishing or giving no raises. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that eventually you won't have any local/US purchasers of houses and products at the inflated costs they are now. So, it'll have to pop.

  166. You know, you're right. by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    You know, you're right.

    But it got me to thinking... everybody and everything but the *shareholders* are a liability. Everything from the actual product the company makes (or service) up to the CEO. It doesn't provide any increase in the value of the company's product.

    So... how much did your company economize on the CEO position this year?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  167. The simplest answer is always the right answer by heroine · · Score: 1

    For all the hot air from Bill Clinton about his massive H1-B quotas being good for u.s. and the hot air from current slashdotters about George Bush killing innovation by banning H1-B's, the simple explanation ended up the right one. H1-B's are for making money.

    No-one increases H1-B quotas to help u.s. dominate technology. No-one buys technology from India to give us all promotions. No-one raises gas taxes to help the environment. These things are done to make money. That's the only reason they are done.

  168. Another Perspective by pixelcort · · Score: 1

    What about people who've grown up in the United States almost all of their life, but since they were not born here, get merely stuck after high school?

    I have a friend like this. An F-1 visa, I think. Basically the way it was explained to me they must pay out-of-state tuition fees, can't work, and once out of college must get some fairly large corporation to sign off that they are needed or something like that. And this is a person who's lived here since they were like 5 or 6. I doubt they even remember their home country.

    Do we really think it's fair to treat these non-citizens this way? Consider this: Immagration is a real thing. Almost every country has it. It is a way for people from other countries to move to ours. I don't know about the culture as it stands nationally, but at least here in California we tend to embrase diversity. Sure, opening up the business world to foreigners lowers the average pay, but one could argue on a global scale that this aids towards a globalization of an economy still quite disoriented.

    And all that aside, think of the innocent lives of what I would argue American adults who grew up here but as they enter adulthood find their oppertunities shunted in the name of protecting our standards of living.

    This is unethical and wrong and someone needs to make a stand for it.

    --
    http://pixelcort.com/
  169. I call bullshit on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the OES wage data for Alameda County (Bay Area), which is toward the higher end of the California salary scale for California. Nowhere is ther listed an "average". Level one is considered a BS and a little experience.
    Check out the OES wage site and see how mych you are underpaid!

    Online Wage Library - OES Wage Search Results
    Tuesday, October 25, 2005 New Quick Search New Search Wizard

    You selected the All Industries database for Calendar Year 2005. Your search returned the following:

    Area Code: 5775
    Area Title: Oakland, CA PMSA
    OES/SOC Code: 15-1021
    OES/SOC Title: Computer programmers
    Level 1 Wage: $24.65 hour - $51,272 year
    Level 2 Wage: $31.29 hour - $65,083 year
    Level 3 Wage: $37.94 hour - $78,915 year
    Level 4 Wage: $44.58 hour - $92,726 year
    GeoLevel: 2

    This wage applies to the following O*Net occupations:
    15-1021.00 Computer Programmers

    Convert project specifications and statements of problems and procedures to detailed logical flow charts for coding into computer language. Develop and write computer programs to store, locate, and retrieve specific documents, data, and information. May program web sites.
    O*Net(TM) JobZone: 4 -- Education & Training Code: 5-Bachelor's degree

  170. so fix the problem by tomcres · · Score: 1

    I have an internet connection because it costs $70 plus the cost of calls to have Verizon phone service. Or, I can get cable internet for $50 plus unlimited calling on VoIP for $20. Do the math. A telephone is a necessity. The problem is that no one wants to fix the educational system in this country. No one wants to be told that their kid isn't "good enough"/"smart enough" to study academics. So everyone goes to college, even the less intelligent who would be better off learning a manual trade. What this does is water down the academic environment and dumb it down so that the ones who probably ought to be pursuing higher studies don't bother. I have a 144 IQ and I became totally disillusioned with the whole idea of going to school when I realized that I was taking harder classes than other students in my school, but you know what? We would end up with the same grades and the same diploma in the end. I worked harder and probably had more talent, yet I don't get any advantage by that. The only thing that really acts as any sort of real qualifier for higher learning are standardized test scores because they are standardized. But now you have this whole movement trying to discredit the SAT and make it so that the playing field is more even. The problem is that not everyone has the same intellectual potential. But in America, "all men are created equal." A real problem. Not to mention that education is way too expensive. Too many high-priced private institutions and even the public institutions that are academically decent cost thousands of dollars to attend. If we had the same educational standards in place that are seen abroad, things would be much better for us here in the US.

    1. Re:so fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why I am always suspicious of whiners claiming a high IQ score? Hmm.

    2. Re:so fix the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, high intelligence, especially of the kind useful for IQ tests, does not imply high emotional intelligence or a good attitude. You can be intelligent but depressed, have a bad self-image, and just spend all day whining in the most eloquent fashion, regardless of potential ability.

  171. Recent H-1 reform act should reduce disparity by gabroo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article didn't make mention of the recently passed H-1 (and L-1) reform act that went into effect this summer. It requires that such workers be paid the higher of two salaries: (a) OES published salaries, or (b) what the company pays others for such work. Not to say that this can't be abused, but the old system made salary abuse by the employer much easier.

  172. Slavery by Descalzo · · Score: 1

    No, George Washington discovered that it was not, in fact, more efficient to have slaves. That was one of the reasons he wanted to free his slaves. He found that they did poor work unless you had overseers (who had to be paid), They would do anything to get out of work, they had to be clothed and fed, and so forth. He had ethical reasons as well, but the economic reasons were very serious.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  173. Reply to sig. by Descalzo · · Score: 1

    Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and Dan Quayle were in a little friendly spelling bee.
    Guess who won?
    Nope, it was Dan Quayle. The word was "harass."
    Quayle was the only one who knew it was one word.

    --
    I cried real tears when Li Mu Bai died.
  174. The post above is completely wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wonrg wrong wrong. I love it when people just shoot off at the mouth saying anything that sounds good to them without firtst getting their facts straight. Here are the facts:

    1. there is a little known Federal law on the books that says that if you're not paying programmers at least 26 and change an hour (this was in 2002- it may be VERY SLIGHTLY more now) THEN they are entitled to time and a half overtime for every hour worked over 40 in a week. California (where I was) has its own law, which requires 45 plus an hour- the state law trumping the Federal law in this case. I guarantee and certify that this is absolutely true, I have read the law myself and consulted labor attorneys on the same subject (some of whom knew less than I did)

    2.The prevailing wage provision of the H1B law poses no problem to employers who want to whittle the wages down over the course of , say three years, thatis, if they decide to pay any attention to the provision at all, which most do not.

    Paying 90% of prevailing wage (whatever THAT is) will have the effect of LOWERING the prevailing wage by 10% a year over the course of, say, three years. In five years, your salsry has been cut in half. This is actaully happening.

    Aside from this, there is no enforcement of the prevailing wage provision because we're not REALLY a nation of laws; we're a nation Have and Have Nots- the Haves buy whatever result they want and in the event they don't get exactly what they want, they ust break the law. I dont' believ I've ever worked fro an employer who wan't engaged in some illegal activity or practice- ever.

    Only if an H1B decides he or she wants to get out of America and go back to whatever 3rd world hell hole they're from by actually complaining about their wages and or working conditions.

    3 There is no requirement - what so EVER _ that employers look for an American or try to find an American for the position. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. Nothing. Zilch.

    For more information try www.zazona.com

  175. Ok, so I'm supposed to BUY your products? by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    Your comment about "lack of skill" is complete horseshit. And if you're going to go on about paying your employees less, then don't whine when they spend less and you find your business in bankruptcy.

    Consumer spending is 2/3 of the economy and lowering their wages has a direct and immediate effect on corporate profits, especially now that the bankruptcy laws have changed.

    If you pay people less then where will they get the money to buy your products and services? Simple question, you should be able to answer it.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  176. BLAH BLAH BLAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blah blah blah!!
    yadd yadda yadda!!
    na na na na na!!!

    Freaking xenophobic pigs.......!!
    Given a level playing field non americans are better than americans..

    Eat it or Leave it!

    As a H1b I have always got the market rate....
    I have worked better than others.
    I have succeded because I did not keep looking into the gutters all the time.
    I have paid taxes and have earned the RIGHT TO LIVE HERE if I WANT TO!!!!!

  177. Re:I don't mean to sound ignorant or anything, but by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    This is not about outsourcing. This is about bringing low wage workers into the U.S. to avoid paying the going wage in the U.S. By law, companies are required to pay H1B workers what they would pay a U.S. worker. Instead, the companies are paying the workers less and avoiding hiring U.S. IT workers.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  178. Extraplation is silly by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Following that logic, why not just open the borders and let everybody in? Why flood *only* IT? Why should I have to pay protected doctor and protected auto-mechanic prices, yet get a non-protected IT salary? Either screw all or screw none.

  179. Conspiracy: Can't put visa apps on Web by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    it's supposed to find highly-skilled workers that can't be found on the local job market NOT fill up entry level positions with underpaid workers.

    Further, efforts by some groups to electronicly publish H-1B requests on the web was rebuffed. If there was a "shortage", one should invite free job advertizing. Yet more evidence the lobbyists don't want citizens.

  180. Conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means: DISCRIMINATION

    Anyone with a resident consition should be able to get paid for his/her work according to the skills and not the visa type!

    If anyone in whatever country ask me what kind of visa I have "before" giving me a job I'll spit his face.

    This looks like a feature of US, shame on you!

  181. No, shame on ourselves, we LET it happen by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Over the years I have learned that one has to protect his/her own political turf. Congress will NOT do what is right and fair on their own; something has to push them in the opposite direction of campaign contributions.

    Learn from the BAR association or the NRA. They know how to protect what they want and have. If us geeks don't learn at least some of the same game, we will be the next agricultural workers.

    Merit won't save you, only postpone the inevitable. Do you think the very best agricultural citizen worker is happy about what happened to agricultural work?

  182. My Apologies to India, Mexico, China, etc... by argoff · · Score: 1

    The truth is that when people from foriegn countries come here, they use freedoms and opportunities that they don't have elsewhere to create wealth and opportunities that never existed before. They don't just sit on their ass and leach ... they invest, they open businesses, they hire or lead to new hiring, they produce, they consume, and just add value to our overall society as immigrants have for over 500 years in the Americas.

    While our standard of freedom has declined over the last few decades, it is still orders of magnatude greater than most of the real world. But lets make no mistake: our economic freedoms have declined because of our own taxes, regulations, debt, and most especially bad monitary policy. To blame any wealth or pay squeese (other than perhaps short term ones) on on foriegners coming here and using the increased freedom here to create success is totally unfair and niaeve.

    As a white American programmer/sysadmin from a midwestern USA family, I am truely embarassed that my cluture is being so mean to the foriegners. In all truth, we should be begging for them to be here and thanking them profusely for hanging their hat in the USA and and choosing us as a place to create future wealth and opportunity. In all truth, we should pratically be kissing their feet in thatkfullness that they are willing to be productive in the USA for only a fraction of the cost that it would normally take. In stead we hate their guts and ignorantly slander that "they are stealing our jobs" like an ignorant mob on a whitch hunt.

    All I can say is that if you are from a foriegn country seeing this, I beg in humiliation, please forgive us. Too many people just don't know what the hell they are talking about. Please, in behalf of my country, I really beg your forgiveness - I am at a loss for words, I cna't even begin to offer a justification.

    I sincerely hope that the foriegners we have treated soo poorly are more forgiving, understanding, and tolerant than we are. If not, it will be a bad omen as in the next few years over a billion people will be comming online to the global economy. God help us.

  183. Initial salaries low 'cos they don't know better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came here 5 years ago. Before coming on board I was asked for my salary wishes. I had no idea what a person with my skills should have asked for.

    So I tried to figure salaries, taxes, costs of living etc. and arrived at a number that would give us (came with wife, who cannot work in the US, but did work back home) at least a comparable lifestyle that we had in our home country, and asked for that. And I got it, no questions asked. Now I know better, and think I could have asked for a bit more and gotten more (my initial salary was still good, it's just that it could have been better).

  184. Utter rubbish. by tabbser · · Score: 1

    I migrated from the UK to live in California 10 years ago. I've been a permanent resident for over 5 years now.
    I can tell you that when you go through H1-B or any type of employment based VISA the INS checks your salary falls within a range and will deny your application if you are not in band.

    This report is bogus trolling, utter rubbish.

    I can also tell you when I moved here I was making more than many of my American counterparts, experience counts baby !

    An H1-B fresh out of Uni will definitely be paid less than an H1-B with 20 years experience, same goes for citizens.
    Companies are also not this dumb. The INS WILL investigate your company and WILL cause a whole pant load of trouble if you do this.
    However, I suspect H1's are not asking for signing bonuses, massive stock grants and obscene moving expenses.

    In the UK I was blissfully unaware of all of those. I moved here by fedexing my most treasured possesions, sold the rest and showed up with a suitcase and re-bought everything I needed.

    I think they reimbursed me for around a total of $500 - $600 and paid for the air ticket.
    I've hired people moving from Seattle to the bay area that have presented me with $20k in moving expenses.

    Doh !

  185. No, it's not better for me that you have my job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I guess you didn't see the huge hole in your argument.

  186. look at it from a new perspective by tjic · · Score: 1

    Oh, those poor exploited H1-B visa workers.

    Imagine this scenario:

    Tomorrow, we in the west are contacted by the aliens of Planet UltraFirstWorld.

    The aliens of UltraFirstWorld speak English. And they need lots and lots of robotics engineers, sysadmins, perl programmers, and customer support folks. Because they are a very wealthy society, they can pay $1 million / year for every techie who goes over there.

    So, they set up a visa program whereby Earthlings can travel there, work for a year, and come back home.

    Go for one year, and you can buy yourself a McMansion inside Rt 128, or a sweet loft in San Francisco, and all the stuff from ThinkGeek you could ever want.

    Go for a few years, and you can come back and catapult your entire family into the upper class.

    Oh...but wait, there is one hitch.

    Alien techies from UltraFirstWorld earn $2 million / year, not the mere $1 million / year they're offering you.

    It turns out that, in accordance with the fundamental laws of economics, you are only being offered the job because hiring more UltraFirstWorld alien techies would cost the firms $2 million or more a year. Doubling the size of all-alien tech staff would require giving bonuses to tempt alien lawyers and doctors into engineering...that might cost $3 million / year.

    So, see, by paying you only $1 million / year, they're exploiting you.

    What the software industry of planet UltraFirstWorld should *really* (a) raise wages for natives from $2 million to something higher; (b) tell you to stay home and keep earning $60 or 90 k on Earth.

    Who benefits from such a proposal?

    Not consumers. They end up paying more for products and services produced at $3 million / year, instead of $1 million.

    Not Earthlings. We end up earning $80k instead of $1 million.

    Not the UltraFirstWorld companies: they have to pay higher wages and work hard to recruit extra workers.

    Only one group benefits: the semi-skilled and semi-employed aliens who would have been hired if the supply of workers was artificially constrained.

    Why should this group be privileged over all of the other groups? What makes them so special?

    1. Re:look at it from a new perspective by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a real question of how much of the benefit really goes to consumers or the H-1b workers. I expect the lions share goes to the owners and managers of the companies in question. So the question becomes why are the owners and managers so much more important than the original tech workers?

    2. Re:look at it from a new perspective by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I'm sure youd expect that the lion's share goes to owners and managers, but do you have proof? For every high-profile company that can afford to just sit on a 20% cost savings, there are a dozen others doing battle with actual competitors that are forced to pass it on to the consumer.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  187. Searching for H1-B Jobs by Dark007 · · Score: 1

    So with all that in mind, does anyone know any good sites for searching for companies that don't mind applying for H1-B visas?
    I'm British and wouldn't mind working in the U.S. for a while.

    Thanks!

  188. horror stories during dot.com bust by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Many H1-Bs were stranded during the dot.com bust. However the state department suspended the requirement they return home, allowing them to stay if had applied for a green card. In earlier years they would have been requiredto return home if they hadnt found a new position in 12 months.

  189. The closer to the money you are by Number6.2 · · Score: 1

    the higher your salary is. This is why salesmen get junkets, er, Team Bulding Strategy Meetings in Cancun, while the engineers can't get get money to cover the cost of driving to a nearby one-day convention.

    Salesmen? They bring the business in, so they can say "Before I turn this contract over to you, what are you going to do for me?" Laywers? They help you hang on to money. At $200/hr. Engineers? They only make things. They're craftsmen. Dime a dozen. Italian stone cutters. Replacable parts. They don't manipulate wealth, they just generate it. Like plankton converts light into usable enery.

    People are our greatest resource. And what do you do with resources? You exploit them. Woah! Leaning a little bit too far to the left, here. God Bless America! God Bless our President! God Bless our Inteligence Services. Did I miss anybody?

    Bitter? Me, Bitter? Nah.

    --
    "If god did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him" --Voltaire
  190. Efficient MARKET (Re:This is news?) by nvandenberghe · · Score: 1

    I've been hiring H1Bs for 10 years, in Silicon Valley and now in New York. Trust me, if there is ANY discrepancy in what H1B holders get vs US engineers, they'll find out and let you know before they've unpacked their wife's sari! It's very simple: if the market is hot, as it was in the late 90's, they'll find another company willing to pay them more, the H1B transfer won't be an obstacle. Quickly the market will settle at the same level as US engineers: there's no reason why it would not. Now there may be some temporary market discrepancy in difficult times: H1B holders may hesitate to jump ship when jobs are scarce. But in that case you can rely on congress to endorse the appropriate demagogic rethoric and cut down on the number of visas!

    1. Re:Efficient MARKET (Re:This is news?) by Axe · · Score: 1

      Yep. The discrepancy comes from large sweatshop like HPS, Infosys, WIPRO Patni, TATA etc, who hire folks who can not make it on their own and pay them peanuts. There is NO discrepancy for H1B holders in normal companies.

      --
      <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  191. At my company, it's about skills by agoraphobe · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt that it's possible to abuse the system, but it's amazingly shortsighted. My company would be willing to spend *more* if we could get competent people. The value of a single great hire is multiple times their salary, and we know it. It's just hard to find good (not "meets minimum standards", but "good") US candidates, and that's the calibre of people we need. When you look at the pool of qualified candidates for entry-level semicustom ASIC design, it's about 80% foreigners, most of whom will need an H1-B or other visa to work for us. Usually they came to the US to go to grad school, so they are currently on a student visa. I think this also accounts (in my company) for the wage differential - H1-B holders are usually new hires. In 4-6 years they've gotten their green card, gotten married, bought a house, and been promoted at least once. They're becoming Americans, too, or their kids will be. I guess I'd like to hire more US citizens, in theory, but the quality just isn't there.

    1. Re:At my company, it's about skills by randall_burns · · Score: 1

      and the quality is _NEVER_ going to be there if companies like yours can pay folks in immigration rights instead of corporate cash. This is just a corporate welfare program.

  192. still more than i get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey! thats still more cash than i earn each month at my IT post in a UK university :-(

  193. You have got to be kidding by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

    You know, if less yahoos thought 53k was not enough money, they'd have more job security. koff koff.

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  194. $10k/year.. are you crazy? by tomcres · · Score: 1

    I was paying more than $10k/year rent living in South Jamaica, Queens... $10k/year you can't even afford to live in one of the most crime-ridden, disgusting places in America!

    You can't compare apples and oranges here. World per capita income may be $10k/year, but the cost of living, largely driven by taxation and greed, is much different in the US than in other places.

  195. Re:Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30 years ago there was no H1B.

    H1B lying about their experience - nothing new there too. say hi to your daddy.

  196. It's unfair by Drol+Odin · · Score: 1

    I don't know why you people disregard the fact that HIB are also skilled workers. This is very unfair to them. Companies hiring them don't just do it because they are cheap. They do it because they can still get the quality of work like most of you do yet they have to pay lower.

    1. Re:It's unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It's the survival of the fittest. There are many USA workers who are overpaid. They earn more than $80k and they don't deserve it. Many H1B holders can and will replace their jobs. You can stop that for happening.

  197. It's unfair by Drol+Odin · · Score: 1

    I don't know why you people disregard the fact that HIB are also skilled workers. This is very unfair to them. Companies hiring them don't just do it because they are cheap. They do it because they can still get the quality of work like most of you do yet they have to pay lower.

  198. Another dodge ... by willtsmith · · Score: 1


    You have dodged the issue. The issue is whether employees are filing their income tax returns and whether the correct amounts are being with-held.

    Our income tax system has been set into an "honor" system. The IRS now lacks it's once legendary ability to make your life a living hell if you fail to file.

    I have heard more than one H1-B contracter laughing over their recalcitrance in paying their INCOME taxes (above and beyond whith-holding).

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  199. Ummm... DUH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like this wasn't known from the start!

    The quality of code produced by some of the people who've come in under H1B in almost every company I've worked at has been utterly abysmal.

    G.

  200. The law requires the prevailing wage regardless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except what you are describing is against the law. H-1B workers have to be paid the higher of the prevailing wage for their occupation and location or the wage based upon skills.

    1. Re:The law requires the prevailing wage regardless by gorbachev · · Score: 1

      No, it is not illegal.

      Prevailing wage based on skill is the legal requirement. The study "studied" salaries regardless of skill grouping people with 1 year of experience together with people that have 12 years of experience just because their title had "computer programmer" in it.

      I've seen the dept of labor salary charts that are used to satisfy the requirements for an H1B application. A software engineer has 4 or 5 categories in it based on experience. This "study" had only one.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  201. My point by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Is that you can make that much without suffering through lawschool and suffering through being a first year associate. They work 90 hour weeks, week in and week out. I know a guy whose partner called him a "pussy" for visiting his wife in the hospital after missing the birth of his first child while working.

    As for me, I make way the hell more than that, and I take a few months off every year. In fact, this year, I'm taking the rest of the year off because why the hell should I work November and December? I've only taken 6 weeks of vacation so far, so I think I've earned some time off. Yet I have "only" an undergraduate degree. From a state school. And not even a good one. My entire college education cost less than one year of law school. And I didn't have to kill myself studying for the bar.

    By the way, I live in one of the most expensive cities in the US, and $70k is nothing. You can't rent a parking spot for $70k/yr, let alone an apartment. My points are:

    1. Becomming a lawyer is not a path to automatic riches. Some lawyers make way the hell more than I do, but many eek by on $50k/yr or less.
    2. Being a lawyer, especially a highly-paid one, really blows donkeys. They work so hard it's insane. No good for me. I like to dick around.
    3. You say you'd like to make $75k and would be willing to kill yourself to do it. Well, personally I don't like to work hard, so it isn't for me, but some people love work, and it sounds like you love work. Good for you. So why don't you go be a lawyer? Or start your own business? Do that, and you'll find out what work really is.

    Actually, I don't really see your point. If you want to work your ass off for $75k/yr, nobody's stopping you. But remember, at least in the states, you've got to go to three years of law school, which costs a ton of $US. And after you're done working your ass off in law school, you get to work your ass off for some partner in some law firm.

    You know, I have to say it's kind of funny. You know when you're poor and you hear rich people say things like, "money isn't everything" and "money can't buy happiness," etc.? And you think to yourself, "That's something rich people say so poor people don't kill them." Well, I've been poor. And right now, I don't feel wealthy, but John Kerry says I'm wealthy and he really wanted to raise my taxes so I guess it must be true. Anyhow, I have to say, money isn't all it's cracked up to be. There are other infinitely more important things in life. My advice to you is to be happy with what you have. Spend time with your family. Go travel the world. That's what life's really about.

    Anyhow, more money is useless if you have no time to spend it.

    Good luck!

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  202. Re:This is BACKWARDS by nlvp · · Score: 1
    People hire foreign workers on H1Bs as cheap labour is one way to look at it.

    H1B visa holders are unfairly underpaid is another.