Slashdot Mirror


New Grads Shun IT Jobs As "Boring"

whencanistop writes "Despite good job prospects, graduates think that a job in IT would be boring. Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy? Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spare time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?"

752 comments

  1. 'boring'??? by avandesande · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:'boring'??? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's right! IT is boring. Stay away. Far away. You won't like it. More money for m....hey look! A shiny object!

    2. Re:'boring'??? by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, screw 'em. Let 'em be doctors and lawyers and such. That means more IT jobs for us.

      --
      sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    3. Re:'boring'??? by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      AMEN, Preach it!

      I have dealt with enough, paycheck hunters and shiny thing people to be tired of them. I get tired of asking the question; "Why are you buying that again? Cause it looks good?" We need to ween this populace down to the passionate individuals who get the job done well. I have been in departments saturated with shiny thing and paycheck hunters that could have been run by a quarter of the people passionate in IT and bored. hell when I left my gov't job they had to hire 2 people to replace me, technically there were 3 that replaced me if you count the one that was hired a couple months before I left.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    4. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMEN!!!!

    5. Re:'boring'??? by spongman · · Score: 1
      Car analogy time? I commute over the Golden Gate bridge every day, but this does not make me a civil engineer. Confucius might have once said:

      "regular facebook usage does not a good software engineer make."
      This reminds me of a category heading I once saw in the London Yellow Pages:

      Boring: (see Engineers)
    6. Re:'boring'??? by BillGod · · Score: 1

      Agreed... the market is so over saturated right now it's ridiculous. Now when I apply for a new job they won't have to sort through all the crap to find a wonderful, smart, charming, incredible employee like myself.

      --
      MISSING - Sig file. 2 years old black and white and very funny. If found please email me.
    7. Re:'boring'??? by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You laugh at the shiny object joke, but I bet most of the poeple in this forum like shiny objects. I became a computer nerd because I NEED to know how everything works, from the toilet, to the dishwasher to the phone, to the RC car.

      When I got my first computer, I poked around the software, but was afraid to take it apart for a long time (I was good at taking things apart, not as good putting them together again). Eventually I took it apart and was disapointed with what I found. All I could see was chips, some big, some small, but it was impossible to see how they actually worked.

      After I finished High School and decided that if worked at Burger King for any longer I would kill myself, I went into computer so that I could learn how a computer actually works. Now that I know how a computer works, by job is to figure out why it's not working.

      People in the industy like Shiny Objects. We tend to gravitate toward complexity to feed that desire to know how everything works.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    8. Re:'boring'??? by knight24k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mamas, don't let your babies grow up to be IT types.
      Don't let em play Guitar Hero or config that old MUX.
      Let 'em be doctors and lawyers and such.


      Sorry, couldn't resist after that doctor and lawyer line...

    9. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

      Agree, Let them venture off with their degree's in 'Marketing' and 'Communications'. Flood the marked with underqualified people to crap jobs and get fired when the "IT Guy" finds that the virus the have on their computer is from them surfing porn at work. Creating a higher demand for IT workers, Creating bigger salary's and thus making the boring IT job, one that affords the porshe,the 500k home, and the dingy trophy wife.
    10. Re:'boring'??? by tonyfugere · · Score: 1

      And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

      Agreed 100%! I cannot stand having people in the business just because they heard they could make bank. As for the IT world, I enjoy my job. There are always rough patches, but at the end of the day, I find myself more than satisfied with my accomplishments.
    11. Re:'boring'??? by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      It appears to be more of a trend in youth than anything to do with our industry. New workers are refusing to take a lot of jobs or work hard (or often even think). They don't rank work very high on their list of important things in life.

      I don't really care much one way or the other--if people would rather climb mountains than work--have at it!

      I think, however, that it's going to be an interesting world the next time we encounter a depression or serious hard times...

    12. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

      Hey! Be nice to the Apple lovers out there!
    13. Re:'boring'??? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      No, because if you were a civil engineer you would have advocated a useless four-way intersection with poorly timed lights right in the middle of the Golden Gate bridge.

    14. Re:'boring'??? by russotto · · Score: 1

      No, because if you were a civil engineer you would have advocated a useless four-way intersection with poorly timed lights right in the middle of the Golden Gate bridge.
      If _I_ were a civil engineer, I'd switch all lanes to right-turn-only at the intersection at the middle of the Golden Gate Bridge. Muhahahaha.
    15. Re:'boring'??? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think we do need 'shiny object' people. As well people in minorities and different backgrounds. I always try to get a diverse set of people to test my code not other coders because they tend to test the code the same way I do. You bring in in front of the user and you see what you did is or isn't ovious. Or actions in an order you never thought. If you do the same old same old then nothing will be new we will just keep optimizing existing code. "Shiny object" programmers tend to bring out new ideas and/or make the existing look that much more appealing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    16. Re:'boring'??? by pacman87 · · Score: 1
    17. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

      I'll pass on the Flash and the Silverlight, but don't you dare mess with my Ruby and Perl!

    18. Re:'boring'??? by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

      heh - That's excellent. I was hoping someone would embellish on that line!

      (and fuck all y'all who modded my orig. post down to zero.)

      --
      sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
    19. Re:'boring'??? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      define IT better please. Sure I think a sysAdmin job would be teh suck... but my sysAdmin buddy of mine thinks that programming is teh suck, while I love my programming job.

      Also notice that they asked non-IT grads......

    20. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck em!
      who needs em more jobs for us~!

    21. Re:'boring'??? by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      I agree. More job security for the rest of us and what is the deal with "nerdy?" Most people are shocked at the fact I am a "IT guy." I don't look nerdy at all. I have been told by most that I look like Kurt Cobain. Which is funny because "Kurt" was my nick name in high school 10yrs ago.

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    22. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some ethics and morals are more important, but hey, some would say that's boring, too.

      IT Jobs in the porn industry are quite spicy.

      (Pardon me, can you please wipe that network cable off)

      Just as it is difficult to find off-the-shelf software for a specialized task -- the same applies to a job that you will love.

    23. Re:'boring'??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And good riddance! We don't need 'shiny object' people in this business.

      They are right. Traditional IT jobs are boring. Most IT organizations are anti-innovation. They are focused on stability, repeatability -- to the point where those with creative, open minds run as far as away as possible, if they are smart and what to keep their sanity. IT is dominated by detail oriented people, not great thinkers. I am glad I am surrounded by these people, and looking forward to getting away from here.
  2. Five Years Into the Job by Van+Cutter+Romney · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd probably agree with them.

    --
    Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
    1. Re:Five Years Into the Job by jorghis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if you dont find it boring to begin with you really need to ask yourself the question "where will I be in five/ten/twenty years?". For the majority going into software engineering or IT the answer is "prettymuch the same thing I was doing two weeks after I graduated college". You might be better at it and you might be leading a team of people, but you will still be doing about the same thing.

      You see this at big companies too, its much more common to promote a software engineer to a "software engineer level 2" or something similar than it is for them to move on to something else. The career path is usually designed to keep you doing the same thing for a long period of time. For many other types of jobs (such as consulting) the entry level position is seen as stepping stone to bigger and better things.

      Now I know that there are a lot of exceptions to this rule, but generally speaking 90% of people who start out in a company as an entry level software engineer or IT guy dont move on to anything else. Thats why people get bored with it imho.

    2. Re:Five Years Into the Job by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree. I do the IT for a small business, and I love what I do. There are aspects that I don't enjoy, especially as far as managing hardware and user support are concerned, but usually it is just downright interesting. I have had the chance to learn a few programming languages and write a couple of specialized applications, which I loved. Aside from the fact that I learn something new every day, besides the fact that every new job is an interesting puzzle, the decisions I make have a real impact on the direction of the business and the well-being its employees, and the feedback from a job well done is immediate and sincere.

      On the other hand, I know people who would die of frustration in my job: there is no direction from higher and you have to write your own job description on a monthly basis.

      I think the IT industry is like any other: you need to find the company with a corporate culture that is right for you. If you like independence, you work for a place like mine. If you like structure, you get a job with one of the bigger code factories. Once you have found the right place, you will like what you do.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    3. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It took me 10 years to fully realize how awful IT was, quit, went back to school, and now I do something completely different. I have never regretted the decision once.

    4. Re:Five Years Into the Job by raburton · · Score: 1

      I'd probably agree with them.

      Even if you dont find it boring to begin with you really need to ask yourself the question "where will I be in five/ten/twenty years?". For the majority going into software engineering or IT the answer is "prettymuch the same thing I was doing two weeks after I graduated college". After 8 years in the job, including the 3 years I worked at a major IT company during my sponsored degree, I agree with your both. I was always interested in computers and made the mistake of thinking it'd make a good career. I'm now back at uni. getting a degree in medicine. At least that way I'll be doing something useful, even if it turns out to be boring in another 8 years.
    5. Re:Five Years Into the Job by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd agree, we take the job because we like figuring out problems. "promotion" is not to management, but to get to work on harder problems... the majority of problems are pretty boring though.

      I've said before, IT is like Plumbing, nobody respects it until it doesn't work. Keeping Plumbing working is pretty boring business too. Of course you see good Master Plumbers make nearly as much as good IT people. Just like IT people, even the best plumbers still lay pipe and plunge toilets.. pretty menial work, just like making, testing, storing backups and building new servers for software testing is.

    6. Re:Five Years Into the Job by AndyGJ · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I do the IT for a small business, and I love what I do.
      Pretty much exactly what its like for me. I work for a company with less than 30 employees, with remote workers in 3rd world countries. The IT is really pretty interesting, on a shoe string budget, and I get a lot of input into the strategic side of not just the IT, but the company.

      I took a bit of a hit in the pay department, but if thatâ(TM)s not a problem for you then I couldn't recommend it more. For me the benefits far outweighed the salary drop.
    7. Re:Five Years Into the Job by bitflip · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you kidding? Working in IT is like going to Disneyland!

      Except all the lines are short because all the rides suck.

    8. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Avatar8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Twenty four years I've been doing IT. I completely agree with them. IT, for the most part is boring. I've moved up steadily in title, salary and responsibility. Still it's the same underneath: fix something, educate people how NOT to break it again, people break it, repeat.


      What's made it much, much worse is how much clerical work we have to do now due to regulations and general ignorance of people new to the industry. We have to document everything so that our job can be outsourced to someone less skilled and willing to work for less. We have to have reviews and justification only because the CIO wants to pretend he has some clue about what's going on. What should be a 10 minute fix turns into a two week red-tape fest. Then they have the nerve to ask why I'm not getting more done.

      If ANYONE asks me if the IT field is a good choice for a career, I solidly reply "Hell, no. Run the other way and get a job *making* something that is useful or a job *helping* people."

      I've been trying to leave IT for the past 10 years, but where else will I find a job that pays so much for such little work?

    9. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It took me a bit longer, but yes its pretty boring now. Same package, wrapped in XML, EJBs and other forms of BS.

    10. Re:Five Years Into the Job by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      Yeah but there's also a big difference between an admin with 2 weeks experience and one with 5-10 years.

    11. Re:Five Years Into the Job by magister159 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I started as an IT lackey when I was 15, finished high school, went to college, all while working as support/helpdesk/etc. I graduated and now I'm working as an IT manager. After roughly 9 years working in IT, I still love doing it.

      I think you have to really love technology and continued learning to do well in IT. When I go home, I have a desktop, laptop, and media center PC to configure, manage, tweak, etc. I read the same RSS feeds and news articles for my job as I do my personal life.

      When your job and hobbies blur together, it's hard to hate what you do

    12. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my very experience with IT and also why I left it. The career steps are very long and the job is routine, despite many people claim programming is fun. For me, it's great fun when you do it for yourself but it's no fun when you have to code JUST ANOTHER business module or website.

      Of course you can run your own business, of course you can "become a manager", but to be honest I believe there are better starting points for doing that.

    13. Re:Five Years Into the Job by lbgator · · Score: 1

      It sounds like I'm following the same route you are (engineering to medicine). I'm curious to hear how well you were received with your technical non-traditional background. Did you have medical volunteer/research experience? Were you grilled for 'waffling' on your career. I've heard that's how it goes for people who didn't know their path since they were seven - any thoughts?

    14. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be better at it and you might be leading a team of people, but you will still be doing about the same thing.
      Or move 'up' into management. No thanks. Most of us will be doing the same thing because we like it.
    15. Re:Five Years Into the Job by raburton · · Score: 1

      The change of career was no problem. In the UK they do an accelerated medical degree. It's one year shorter than a normal one (condensed rather than missing anything important out), for graduates. The theory being that having done one degree already you're older, smarter and hopefully more capable than the average 18 year old undergrad. Also, the more varied backgrounds brings extra skills to the job, which they want to encourage. Even so, most medical schools that offer this course (by no means all of them) usually want to see a good bit of bio/chem education. However at Nottingham uni they will accept any degree, although they there is a big entrace exam and you need to come in the top 20% (IIRC) to be considered for an interview. So even if you didn't formally study the subjects you need to have studied them somewhere before you can do that. It's really about proving capability to and willingness learn to the required level, plus a bit of basic background science. Some relevant experience is required, but it doesn't have to be a lot. I spent 6 months working weekends as a health care assistant at a local hospital, while still doing my IT day job for the rest of the week and studying for the exam (from not having done any bio/chem since I was 16). That feat gives you something to talk about in the interview! I did know my original path for a long time, I chose it all at my first academic options (age 13 in the UK), and followed it through. If only I'd stopped to think along the way! Though I did have some experiences along that journey that probably pushed me towards this. Here, because it was a graduate entry course, they didn't expect you to have always wanted to do medicine. It certainly helps your application if you can explain why you now want to do it of course. Of course I could have applied for the normal undergrad course, and that would have been a very different experience I suppose, but I didn't want to go that route. I hope your change goes well, mine has so far, I haven't looked back!

    16. Re:Five Years Into the Job by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Even if you dont find it boring to begin with you really need to ask yourself the question "where will I be in five/ten/twenty years?". For the majority going into software engineering or IT the answer is "prettymuch the same thing I was doing two weeks after I graduated college". You might be better at it and you might be leading a team of people, but you will still be doing about the same thing.

      The same could be said of pretty much any career field. IT isn't unique except in its obscene level of self indulgent navel gazing.
    17. Re:Five Years Into the Job by wafflechunk · · Score: 1

      Three months into the job and I already agree with them.

    18. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For many other types of jobs (such as consulting) the entry level position is seen as stepping stone to bigger and better things.

      What is entry level in your geographical area? In mine, it is 3-5 years experience, "proven" major project management skills, must be able to part the Red Sea, yadda, yadda...

      Nobody hires entry level people anymore, unless they're fresh out of college and their dad plays golf with X at company Y.

    19. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm barely one month into my internship and I'll agree with them. It's not that this is something anyone can do, but it is certainly something I don't want to do. I'm a computer science major. I love programming, designing and debugging things. I love working in a team and seeing how other people do things (code solutions). I do service desk/tier 2 tech work and I really feel no inspiration for this field. The thing that gets me the most is how pointless my job would be if the people doing the programming would do a better job or hardware manufacturers would not use such cheap parts. You're treated like crap because the service desk is the face of all the computer problems in the company - as if I go out of my way to break each individual's computer so that I can fix it later.

      My idea for getting an internship was to apply my scholastic knowledge to the real world. What I do now feels like something I could have done in high school. Am I learning anything? Aside from the intricacies of software that I don't care about (like Outlook and Document Locator), I don't feel like I'm learning anything aside from how much people hate it when their stuff breaks.

      That said, I have the utmost respect for people who do this job and have not lost their minds. I'm counting the days until my gleeful return to the world of academia.

    20. Re:Five Years Into the Job by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      I am also a medical student that graduated with an engineering degree. My engineering degree was in biological engineering as opposed to civil, chemical, or any other discipline of engineering, so I wasn't received any differently than people with the pretty-much-standard biology degree as I had many of the same core classes. I will say that an engineering background *does* make some aspects of medical school harder and some easier. You will likely not be as good of a "cram-and-dump" memorizer, which will knock your fill-in-the-bubble exam scores down a bit compared to others. But engineering is great for problem solving and math and you'll notice this when it comes to the practicals. As far as math goes, medical math is not complicated but you will have to do algebra and arithmetic frequently. I'd have paid for half of my tuition if I got a nickel for every time I did a simple calculation in my head or on a notepad (such as mg/kg dosages) and the non-engineer student or doctor there with me had to whip out the smartphone or calculator and take three times as long.

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    21. Re:Five Years Into the Job by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Now I know that there are a lot of exceptions to this rule, but generally speaking 90% of people who start out in a company as an entry level software engineer or IT guy dont move on to anything else. Thats why people get bored with it imho.

      Keeping the same title does not have to mean that you do the same thing. I've been a professional software engineer for 4 years now, and every year I've worked on something completely different. I've build flash-based CAD systems, delphi-based translation software, a rich web grid component, and recently an outlook room reservation plugin. Now I'm designing a framework for a dual web 2.0 / xhtml mobile web portal. This is all at the same company with the same job title.

      The vast majority of the time my work is not boring at all. The kind of "career growth" I experience is in knowledge and skill set (and in money too ofcourse), not in job title.

      Then again, maybe I need to give it another decade and see how I feel about it then.

    22. Re:Five Years Into the Job by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Disneyland's rides suck and the lines are long. Universal FTW!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    23. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Eil · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Computers have always been my favorite and strongest skill, but it's hard to find job that's either rewarding or high-paying, let alone both. These days, it's difficult to make serious money in I.T. unless you're a hot-shot consultant or come up with the next big thing on the web.

      If I could go back and talk to my younger self, I'd recommend getting some kind of financial investment degree.

    24. Re:Five Years Into the Job by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. What are these bigger and better things which are more enjoyable than software engineering?

      Software engineering is the top of the mountain. You can't go up from the top. (unless you stand on a stack of cows)

    25. Re:Five Years Into the Job by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      Keeping the same title.. Be careful - titles have an inflation today, yesterdays operators are now administrators, administrators are managers, programmers are developers, developers are architects, and so on. You are on right track, using marketing terms as Web 2.0, etc which don't even have definitions will take you up - just try to get your title changed. Looking a new job - the first screening is the job title! Should not be difficult, companies give titles rather than pay more, the Dilbert principle, but it works.

      About IT being boring - after 30+ years I still think there are no boring jobs but there are very boring tasks! A huge difference - any job in IT can be interesting if you are allowed to do it right, as you have found out. Again, be careful, even in best companies it doesn't last, you get new management, new visions, new whatever and you will be limited and without a title (the magical words) can't even get out, you have to start all over again.

    26. Re:Five Years Into the Job by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Meh. Try a real theme park: Busch Gardens or Cedar Point.

    27. Re:Five Years Into the Job by theMatrix777 · · Score: 1

      I'd probably agree with them. Are you kidding? Boring? No way!
      In this day and age, IT is the perfect place to be, IF you have an imagination! If anyone is bored, it's their own fault.

      I wouldn't give up this occupation for anything. This is where all the action is; we are explorers into the great unknown. Pushing the boundaries to limits that have yet to be tested and someone is actually bored?

      You don't like hardware; Go to software. Don't like CSS work on something else. What about AI? Is that exciting or what!!!!

      Wake up people. We, in this business, are living in exciting times......

    28. Re:Five Years Into the Job by IMightB · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Cleveland (about 40 minutes from Sandusky where Cedar Point is) and I have traveled around 35 different states and go to about every theme park in them) and in all that time, I have not found another amusement park that can even hold a candle to Cedar Point. I currently live in Denver and Elitch Gardens is about 1/4 the size and many many times suckier....

      I guess my point is: Cedar Point R0x0rz!

      17 Coasters!

      http://www.cedarpoint.com/public/park/rides/coasters/index.cfm

  3. Different perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then again, if most folks look at computers as an appliance, who wants to be an appliance repairman? Seriously - how many folks wanted to work for the phone company in the 60s and 70s?

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    1. Re:Different perspective by omeomi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You mean during the heyday of Bell Labs, when they were dumping money into R&D, and inventing things like a little language named C, a little operating system named Unix, the electret microphone, the CO2 LASER, and the first 32-bit microprocessor? Yeah, who would want to work there?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Labs#1960s

    2. Re:Different perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bell labs in its heyday was a couple thousand people. Ma Bell as a whole was nearly a million. I somehow think that most people's idea of what "work for the phone company" means is more like the guy who installs phones or the one who runs a switchboard...

      Besides, alongside the Bell Labs reputation for brilliance was their reputation as the alpha geeks of their day...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    3. Re:Different perspective by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's going on with the mods on this thread.

      Yes - in hindsight, it looks like an awesome place to work on - and if you were involved in research, you might have known enough about it and really wanted to work there.

      But that completely misses the question from the GP:

      How many folks, during the 60s and 70s, really wanted to work for the phone company at that time?

      (nerds from the present with access to wikipedia do not count)

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    4. Re:Different perspective by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'm the Maytag Repairman, you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:Different perspective by thegameiam · · Score: 1

      It takes a certain kind of patience to put up with the boredom... almost like waiting for a windows reboot...

      --
      Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
    6. Re:Different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume people even knew about those things, let alone could get one of the few research positions available at the time. How many programmers, IT support, admin dweebs and whatnot do you know? How may R&D people do you know?

    7. Re:Different perspective by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's going on with the mods on this thread.

      Yes - in hindsight, it looks like an awesome place to work on - and if you were involved in research, you might have known enough about it and really wanted to work there.

      But that completely misses the question from the GP:

      How many folks, during the 60s and 70s, really wanted to work for the phone company at that time?

      (nerds from the present with access to wikipedia do not count)

      According to the another response: "Bell labs in its heyday was a couple thousand people. Ma Bell as a whole was nearly a million." So nearly a million, or most likely more than just about any other employer. I guess the GP was wrong and the phone company was a super-popular place to work. That seems to answer the question.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    8. Re:Different perspective by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      According to the another response: "Bell labs in its heyday was a couple thousand people. Ma Bell as a whole was nearly a million." So nearly a million, or most likely more than just about any other employer. I guess the GP was wrong and the phone company was a super-popular place to work. That seems to answer the question. "Wanted to work for" != "Needed a paying job"
    9. Re:Different perspective by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      a little operating system named Unix What is that? Is it like Windows 3.1?
    10. Re:Different perspective by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the people who worked on this sort stuff:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Labs#Discoveries_and_Developments

      A few of them are even at one of those search engine companies.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:Different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't get laid now, they didn't get laid in 60's, so whats your point?

    12. Re:Different perspective by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I probably need a definition of "IT". My view of it is that there's almost no engineering or even programming involved. The challenging aspects for some are about project management, but for most people it's an endless job of putting out small fires. "IT" to me is not just all jobs everywhere that have something to do with "information" and/or "technology". "IT" is technical support for businesses; database management, installing software, managing the network, etc. Companies that design the computers and software and hardware are not "IT" (ie, Bell Labs was not "IT").

      It makes sense that a fresh engineering graduate is likely to be more interested in a job related to engineering.

    13. Re:Different perspective by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How many folks, during the 60s and 70s, really wanted to work for the phone company at that time? Probably lots and lots of them. At that time, you usually spent your entire career at a single company. AT&T was a good choice in that world view; lots of stability (no one was thinking about breaking it up), and good opportunities for upward or lateral mobility.
    14. Re:Different perspective by poached · · Score: 1

      I introduce myself as a software programmer. Every once in a while I have people call me up and ask me why is my computer not starting up, etc. Even though that's not what I do, I just happen to have an interest in fixing them that I am generally helpful in some way. where am I going with this???

    15. Re:Different perspective by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Then again, if most folks look at computers as an appliance, who wants to be an appliance repairman? Seriously - how many folks wanted to work for the phone company in the 60s and 70s? Are you kidding? That Maytag guy is like sitting on his ass every fucking day! Easy gig.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    16. Re:Different perspective by Jardine · · Score: 1

      Then again, if most folks look at computers as an appliance, who wants to be an appliance repairman? Seriously - how many folks wanted to work for the phone company in the 60s and 70s?

      Plenty of people. Good pay, good union (making it hard to get fired for bullshit reasons), steady work, and at a company that would have to try very hard to go bankrupt.

    17. Re:Different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i lol'd.

      BIX NOOD

    18. Re:Different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean during the heyday of Bell Labs, when they were dumping money into R&D, and inventing things like a little language named C, a little operating system named Unix, the electret microphone, the CO2 LASER, and the first 32-bit microprocessor? Yeah, who would want to work there?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Labs#1960s

      Don't kid yourself friend. Bell Labs was never IT. It was innovation. Developing products and innovating never was IT. IT is generally infrastructure and operations. If you're blessed with a big R&D budget, likely you're working for a developer or manafacture on a product that actually produces revenue. Most IT shops just drain revenue from a company. And they buy technology, not create it.
      (of course there are exceptions flame boys)
    19. Re:Different perspective by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Yep - the factoid still seems mostly irrelevant.

      By that argument, graduates' dream job right now is to work at Walmart - seeing as it is the largest employer in the US and has twice the employee count.

      But I'm pretty sure even IT jobs are considered less boring than being a 'Wal-Mart greeter' by most graduates.

       

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    20. Re:Different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. Who wants to maintain a telephone system? Not everyone that worked for Ma Bell in the 60's was developing cutting edge software.

    21. Re:Different perspective by tuomoks · · Score: 1

      You are so right! IT today is not creating but using - unfortunately (or fortunately if you take it that way) even huge software (don't know so much about hardware) companies don't develop, they buy! And the results are not always nice because they did see a nice product but can't / don't know what to with it? Of course it is nice for some who take the pain to develop (new) something and (may) get bought out, so no wonder that people are not any more interested to work in IT - it is a consumer trade and industry today.

  4. If I had the power to do it all over again... by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would have gone into Economics.

    Or maybe Forestry...

    If I had only known the IT world would turn into what it is now, I'd do something else. Too much politics... To much hype...

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had only known the IT world would turn into what it is now, I'd do something else. Too much politics... To much hype

      That's going to be the case in any field. I would imagine that economics would be worse than most in those respects, so you may be lucky. Forestry might limit your job opportunities.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by wolfen · · Score: 5, Funny

      I... I wanted to be! A lumberjack!

      Leaping from tree to tree, as they float down the mighty rivers of British Columbia!

    3. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Sibling poster is right about forestry being limited, and I'll tell you, it's rife with politicing as well...Any field that depends on the gov't for money is going to be rife with it.

      And economics? Jesus. If you wanted to go into brokerage or something, maybe, but pure economics is an extremely limited niche field where people dismiss you if you don't say what they want to hear. Or you could teach.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by jorghis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Economics is an extremely limited niche field? Have you heard of wall street? All those big investment banks and trading firms look first to economics grads when they go hiring. Wall Street grabs just as many economics grads as Silicon Valley does CS majors.

    5. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think there would be less politics in Forestry? You'd find yourself either trying to get more reserves to cut down, fighting against those damn environmentalists, or trying to get more reserves protected, fighting against those damn loggers. There are lobbiests, unions, and politics from small towns to nations and the United Nations.

    6. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Huntr · · Score: 1

      In Forestry, basically you cut down trees and you grow trees (among other duties, but that's the gist of it). Lemme explain something. Not everyone wants trees grown or cut down. Where do you think the term treehugger comes from? Forestry is highly political.

    7. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they grab PhD in many fields, as long as you can model and program (actually, programming isn't a requirement; otherwise, I wouldn't had such a had time dealing with their messes)

    8. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I kinda agree. I LOVE computers. Love programming. But yeah, I don't like the politics and the bullshit that sometimes comes along with it (then again, if more people just into the job for the money got out, that might change).

      Still, if I had it to do over again, I'd probably look at what I had my heart set on BEFORE I got so into computers: astronomy. Another subject that I like, and it typically doesn't have the number of high salaried jobs needed to attract people who aren't truly interested in the field :).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Synchis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having pretty much lived and breathed both Network admin jobs, programming jobs and QA/Testing jobs for the last... 8 years, I'm inclined to agree with you.

      Of late, I've started to become a little dis-illusioned with the whole industry... unfortunately, at this point in my career, I'm finding it difficult to see a path out. All I really know is computers, and although I have keen interests in other areas, I'm finding that other paths would require a large amount of re-education.

      I was at a training course, and the instructor was going through the various generations of our times, and was mentioning the fact that GenX'ers (thats me) on *AVERAGE* have 7 different jobs(careers) throughout their lives, as opposed to the past generations which had like... 2-3 jobs. Also, GenX'ers are tending to look for more than just monetary compensation. There has to be something more to the job, something to keep them interested.

      I'm finding it harder and harder to stay interested in my job...

      --
      Thomas A. Knight
      Author of The Time Weaver
    10. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Wait, you want to go into *business* because you don't like *politics* and *unjustified hype*? Woaaah.

    11. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by metlin · · Score: 1

      I second that.

      Economics is an awesome subject. In fact, there is a field called Computational Economics, that uses game theory and other computational fields to develop quantitative economic models (macro and micro).

      Quite fun.

    12. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      And strategy consulting.

      A lot of folks that I work with are econ majors - they do such things as market and channel distribution strategy, trending, demographic and geographic estimation for consumer sales, building economies of scale models for new markets, market penetration analysis and so on.

      The opportunities are endless.

      If you have an econ degree from a good school (Harvard, UChicago etc) and if you have a quantitative mind to boot, there are so many fun things you could do.

    13. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      I would have gone into ecology or possibly zoology had I known what I know today. Not only is IT work boring, it is thankless, and as cliche as it may sound, I don't like the idea that all my work is doing nothing but making other people wealthy.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    14. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actuaries make good money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I did go into economics, and look where I ended up... I've done a lot of things in my life, and technology is hard to beat.

      BTW, economics was and is a great degree to get. Without a good understanding of economics, it's hard to really understand why the world and business work the way they do.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    16. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Alchemist253 · · Score: 1

      It seems ironic that you would want to go into Economics because IT is too political...

    17. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Too much politics... To much hype... Too much whining...
    18. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I chose hydrology as a second career. 1/2 of my time is in the field, the other 1/2 is in the office analyzing data. Just the right mix.
      And since my job requires field time, it can't be offshored.

      It feels good to do something real.

    19. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by blueforce · · Score: 1

      Frack, if I had to do it all over again, I'd be an Oil baron.

      Hindsight being what it is and all...

      --
      If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
    20. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by g0at · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of wall street? Nope, but I have heard of Wall Street. (The former does sound like a nifty visual illusion, though...)
    21. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were not in the CID
              Something else I'd like to be
              If I were not in the CID
              A window cleaner, me!
              With a rub-a-dub-dub and a scrub-a-dub-dub
              And a rub-a-dub all day long
              With a rub-a-dub-dub and a scrub-a-dub-dub
              I'd sing this merry song!

    22. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      I wanted to be a log-driver, burlin down and down white waters...

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    23. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Jozef+Nagy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Actuaries are Applied Math, as is Computer Science. Theoretical Math is where the fun's at ... if you enjoy a hopeless subsistence working in academia.

    24. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. I've been in IT for about 14 years, and I'm bored out of my skull with it. It's not at all interesting anymore. I have about 2 years left until I'm totally debt-free, and at that time I'm going to jump clear of this profession and do something else.

    25. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      That's not true at all. Wall Street will grab whomever they think is qualified, economics major or not. And just because you're an economics major doesn't mean you'll go straight into Wall Street. You have to be good--really good--at math.

      Math and science majors who do exceptionally well in big-name schools go into Wall Street, i-banking, and other high-paying, high-stress jobs. Liberal arts majors, not so much.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    26. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by master811 · · Score: 1

      Economics is an extremely limited niche field? Have you heard of wall street? All those big investment banks and trading firms look first to economics grads when they go hiring. Wall Street grabs just as many economics grads as Silicon Valley does CS majors.

      The difference of course is you don't NEED an economics or business degree to go into an investment bank. A friend that graduated from Uni last year did Bio Sciences and now works at Lehman Brothers as a Grad Analyst. Ok he did well and went to a good uni, and I suppose being sciencey/maths related helps, but still, just shows that having an economics degree is more limiting that a lot of others.
    27. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      My wife got an Economics degree, had trouble finding a job that wasn't infinitely boring, gave up, got a teaching credential, and now teaches ten year olds for a third my salary.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    28. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely why I'm in economics now. Took some IT classes... nearly died of boredom. Decent money and job security just aren't worth it.

    29. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grass is always greener. Of course there's no politics around money management or cutting down trees. Never.

    30. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by NoBozo99 · · Score: 1

      I'd go into Library Science and get an MLS. May not pay the most, but at least you aren't stuck doing 50 or 60 hour work weeks, high stress levels, and job insecurity.

      --
      I may not be a smart man, but I know what an inode is.
    31. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by JudgeJackson · · Score: 1

      Wow, that brings me back a few years... For those that don't get the reference: Logdriver's Waltz

    32. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a lumberjack and im OK

      (sorry couldnt resist!)

    33. Re:If I had the power to do it all over again... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Second this. Or, if not that, at least start doing IT work for a library. Nice gig.

  5. Let's spice up IT by Lord+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to Computer Weekly, this is apparently not a new trend. In the TFA they link to one of their own articles from 2001 that says basically the same thing.

    The TFA goes on to quote someone as saying, "We need to show [young people] the variety of roles in IT and the importance that IT carries today. IT is at the heart of business these days and there are real opportunities now to have a career in IT which will ultimately lead to a position on the board."

    A position on the board? That is supposed to be "not boring"?

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Let's spice up IT by Interl0per · · Score: 1

      If a board position is what you are after, there are fast-track positions for that sort of thing that don't involve 24x7 on-call work fixing OS installs for shops' on-site technician (brother-in-law) at the fabulous rate of $25k/yr (with experience). I guess education really is good for something, these grads are pretty smart ;)

    2. Re:Let's spice up IT by tattood · · Score: 1

      A position on the board? That is supposed to be "not boring"?
      Personally, I think a board position would be boring, but that's me. And, how long does it take to get to that position? You'll probably have to spend 10-15 years working your way up through the IT chain to get to CIO/CSO before anyone is going to consider you for a board position. I don't think a board seat is the top of the list for most IT people.
      --
      WTB [sig], PST!!!
    3. Re:Let's spice up IT by Bandman · · Score: 5, Funny

      This isn't a lot different than the general decline of math and science careers in general. It's just a small sign that we're moving away from skilled knowledge-based industries into crap-service based industries.

      Would you like fries with that?

    4. Re:Let's spice up IT by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'll probably have to spend 10-15 years working your way up through the IT chain to get to CIO/CSO before anyone is going to consider you for a board position. That depends on how many people you have above you, your ability to fill their roles when they are gone, and how many you can eliminate in a day.
    5. Re:Let's spice up IT by happyemoticon · · Score: 4, Funny

      My IT job is plenty spicy after I figured out how to make my desktop loop Destination Calabria.

    6. Re:Let's spice up IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My IT guys block youtube.

    7. Re:Let's spice up IT by Creedo · · Score: 1

      I...couldn't stop watching.......

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    8. Re:Let's spice up IT by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Fast food "service" isn't a service industry job, it's a retail job. There's a world of difference between those two.

      IT and most math jobs are closer to be service industry jobs, since you're not working with a physical product.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    9. Re:Let's spice up IT by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      IT in general is already a crap-service industry. Have you called ANY help support line lately? Those people on the front line are supposed to have some skills to determine the actual problem, but instead they read a script and take whatever actions the script says.


      If you can finally get to a second or third level person who is REALLY supposed to be skilled, they're still reading from a script and making best guesses. If there were a database that could store all the possible problems and intelligently choose the solution, those support people would not be needed.

      I think that manual occupations (construction, sewing, sculpting) take a great deal more skill than IT.

    10. Re:Let's spice up IT by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      OK. I'm ruined.

    11. Re:Let's spice up IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Okay. Thinking it might be nice to be able to have some clips of beautiful videos from the sunny beaches of southern Italy, I took a look.

      Um, so, I guess you weren't talking about vacation spots.

    12. Re:Let's spice up IT by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're confusing "IT" with the function that most (most especially those actually in IT) refer to insultingly as the "Help Desk". The guys working the Help Desk are generally there because they either a) are too stupid to do anything else, b) are totally devoid of experience and have to put in their 2 years or so of Help Desk work just to get something on the resumé, or c) happen to be in an oversaturated area where there simply are no other jobs available.

      To me, the core of "real" IT work is moreso in the background. Administration of servers, planning of backups, designing of corporate networks, securing said networks, and development of in-house programs. Those things DO take skill (trust me I worked in construction for side money every summer from my junior year in high school till I graduated college - my current IT job takes a lot more skill), but nobody realizes that they're back in their offices making everything work. That is, unless it breaks. Ironically though, the best IT people of that sort are the kind that nobody ever thinks about, because their systems keep humming along unnoticed. The only experience the users then have is with the help desk staff when something breaks on their local machine ;).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    13. Re:Let's spice up IT by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      My IT guys block youtube.

      So do mine, but so poorly that there are at least three or four ways to backdoor into any Youtube link. I guess if they weren't so bored, they'd figure out how to block these pesky time-waters once and for all!
    14. Re:Let's spice up IT by brkello · · Score: 2, Funny

      The TFA

      I don't think TFA means what you think it means.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    15. Re:Let's spice up IT by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      A note to our international readers: actual appeareance of Calabria inhabitants may differ (probably NSFW).

    16. Re:Let's spice up IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a recent CS grad, IT, even considered rightly as you've described it, sounds terribly dull compared to working as a programmer on a large, serious software project for a company that primarily makes software.

      As for Bill Gates, he was a hardcore programmer back in the day, and reading "Accidental Empires", or anything else about the early MS days, you get a feel that programming is really hard and exciting. But that's systems/compiler programming, not IT.

    17. Re:Let's spice up IT by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I suspect that board members spend more afternoons out playing golf and drinking beer than they do sitting in a cubicle listening to MP3s, just waiting for 5pm to roll around...

      Something I've noticed is that there seems to be a push here domestically a couple months before the requests for more H1B workers. This push - in the media and in corporate environments - seems to be to discourage people in IT, and to discourage people looking to get into IT.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Let's spice up IT by Geminii · · Score: 1
      The guys working the Help Desk are generally there because they either a) are too stupid to do anything else, b) are totally devoid of experience and have to put in their 2 years or so of Help Desk work just to get something on the resumé, or c) happen to be in an oversaturated area where there simply are no other jobs available.

      I worked various helpdesks for around ten years, and I have to say that I saw this becoming more and more the case. When I started out, I worked in places where a helpdesk job needed a bunch of skills tests, demonstrated familiarity with the local SOE, and about three months' training on top of that. And then you got to be God for anyone under the executive level. Most of the job was network monitoring, server tweaking, and catching and repairing faults before anyone was caught by the impact. You needed top-notch f2f, written and spoken communication skills, and were often called upon to be the IT trainer for new staff.

      These days, any given Helpdesk seems to employ the otherwise unemployable - mumbling illiterates who can't tell an elbow from an ASIC.

      On the plus side, if I ever went back into IT, I'd be able to demand close to six figures just for Helpdesk work - because I'm the only guy with that much experience on the job, and as far as I can tell, the ability to set up a top-quality helpdesk or repair a failing one is epic-level rare even amongst those who style themselves helpdesk managers.

      (Mmm, consultancy work.)

    19. Re:Let's spice up IT by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      Your "core IT work" just described what I do and have done for the past 14 years (prior to that was desktop support, etc.). I'm a Sr. System Administrator currently in a large company. Smaller companies where you ARE the IT department do require a wider variety of skills, but being a SysAdmin supporting hundreds of servers in a large company.... boring day in and day out.


      No, I'm not confusing IT with help desk. What I'm saying is that regardless of skill or title level, you end up with people who are following a script and only doing a routine of functions they were taught. Very few of us have the skill to troubleshoot rare or new problems or design ways to eliminate current and future problems.

      Yes, I am totally burned out on IT. Have been for years. Computers are tools and should be used FOR jobs not BEING the whole job. I'd still recommend anyone considering a career in IT to turn away and do something else, anything else. Learn how to use a computer, but don't let it be the main purpose of your job.

  6. Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, there are plenty of jobs in IT that allow for creativity (game design, many coding projects, etc.). But, in fairness, a lot of IT jobs involve running cabling, fixing routers, database entry, coding really dull projects, etc. that most people WOULD find pretty fucking boring.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by jo42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hate to piddle in your soup, but most jobs in the world are "pretty fucking boring". Welcome to reality.

    2. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...yeah but most of them don't cost you 50 grand up front just to get started.

      You don't need to waste 4 years of your life just to be miserable at your job.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't IT. Coding isn't IT.

    4. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The underlying personalty traits required are, you either are a computer geek/nerd or you are not. You either enjoy keeping up with changes in computers and software, learning new skills, effectively applying your continually changing skills, the technical side of computer hardware and software, or you don't and after a short uninspiring career you become a computer salesperson, a drone.

      I can't help it, I'd rather be a university gaining new knowledge, than be on an overseas holiday. I rather spend all night configuring, adjusting and tweaking computer hardware and software than be getting drunk in some crap night club. I'd rather be /.ing than mindlessly myspaceing and so for me a career in computers just ain't boring even if a do find some elements somewhat tiresome like coding.

      So the grads are just leaning the computers skills are more difficult than other grad choices and the big entry level salaries are gone eliminating blind greed as the only reason to choose a career in computers, so reduced numbers are to be expected and generally it is better for the whole industry, less drones sucking up space doing more harm than good and of course the actually computer geeks/nerds get to enjoy higher salaries and better conditions.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by DrMaurer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. Must suck to be like that.

      I mean, it's easy to be cynical, but if you're bored at what you're doing, it's your fault.

      Blah blah blah, it's too hard to start my own company. Blah blah blah, it's too tedious to do that thing. Blah Blah Blah.

      If it's that hard, that boring, then make something that does that thing for you. Sometimes it's easy (autohotkey script), sometimes it's not so much (lots of things).

      You are the master of how you react to what you're doing. If you're bored, sucks for you, and I sympathize, I really do.

      But the way "reality" works is that it pays people who come up with better, faster, and cheaper ways of doing stuff. Often times you don't even have to do all three!

      Cynicism may win you karma on Slashdot, but it doesn't pay the bills.

      --
      Dan
    6. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno about you, but my salary is a substantial multiple of the median wage in the country. Sure, the job sucks some days, but it's better to suck for a good wage than not.

      If you are miserable in your job, you need to look inward, my friend. We're as happy as we decide to be.

      There are very few well paid jobs that don't require education and paying your dues. Since I don't have the prerequisites to be a $1000/hr hooker, technology will have to do.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    7. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the IT jobs where there are hookers and blackjack..

    8. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      But the way "reality" works is that it pays people who come up with better, faster, and cheaper ways of doing stuff. One out of three ain't bad. Unfortunately, in "reality", better and faster never matter...only cheaper. Or am I just being overly harsh of the software company I work for?
    9. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by acey72 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that running cable is a part of my work which I really enjoy - OK, it's mucky and doesn't take a huge amount of brain power but it's the one place where my normally messy and chaotic self can get really anal about neatness and getting everything just-so. Weird, but there you go... :)

    10. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by poached · · Score: 1

      you mean /. ing is better than myspacing??? sweet! Surely there is an overabundance of insightful posts like yours to make this a much better way to spend my time than e-stalking cute girls!!!1

    11. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by deepgrey · · Score: 1

      Guess that means I don't get to fly the Millennium Falcon and kill stormtroopers... darn...

    12. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      I dont believe the full on computer obsession is required to be an excellent computer using knowledge worker/IT agent. I think this is a common fallacy, and part of the reason people either think tech is the bee's knees or boring as crap.

      The truth of the matter is that computers and the software on them are just tools. Further, our tools really havent changed that drastically in the last 10 years. Their interfaces may have, but for the most part the things you can do with computers are pretty similar to the things you could do with them 10 years ago.

      So long as you have an active interest in learning to improve your tool using efficacy, I strongly believe it doesnt matter whether you are obsessed with learning about new tools or not. As long as you actively pursue means of making yourself and your environment better, I dont care whether you are writing in assembly, ruby, ocaml, or excel; you are the type of person who belongs in tech.

    13. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, if there's one thing an IT job doesn't involve, it's data entry. Unless you're talking about moving large quantities of data around with SQL, things that a non-programmer wouldn't be able to do.

    14. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by brkello · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't consider "game design" or "coding" IT. IT is all the other stuff you described. Server admin, running cables, writing dumb scripts, rebooting servers. Certainly, stuff that gets old pretty quickly for most people.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    15. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      Then again, game design doesn't exactly fall under the category of IT.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    16. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Support! Never forget support people! Not only do they do boring stuff and they get abused for it too!

      I've been programming for over fifteen years. The work IS boring. You can't get into an area that you would like because of the old argument "You need 3 years experience in that field" but how do you get the experience without the job!

      But since garbage truck drivers get better pay than programmers, programming can't be the most boring job around!

    17. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The problem I see is that most IT jobs do not have a clear advancement scale, and experience in your job seems to not be all that important - experience in your next job is.

      For instance, a person can work for years as a developer, or as a tier-1 technician without advancement, despite competence in their job. Why? Well, there are a number of reasons, and i don't think it usually has to do with actual lack-of competence.

      * First, there seems to be a tendency to hire-out jobs instead of look to your existing employees for the skills you need. If your internal developer has been with you for 2 years and has improved while there, but still lacks a bullet item or two on his resume "needed" to qualify for the job, he's not considered despite all other qualifications.
      * Aside from the Jr $role -> $role -> Sr $role progression, there does not seem to be much room for advancement. Managers and supervisors are hired externally, seemingly almost always with a management background instead of anything relating to the actual work done. This leads to the people lower-down having to pick up more work to make up for the fact that the manager isn't managing.
      * Employees are infrequently given the time to actually improve their skill-sets due to omnipresent deadlines and driving managers, requiring them to do this on their time off. (Ironically, they might be more willing to improve their skills at home if they weren't driven so hard at work...) Not only does this relate to the above item of promotions, but it's contrary to almost many other fields out there, where actually doing your job well is/can be largely influential on promotion into another (unrelated) field.
      * IT workers are not treated as professionals by employers - management or HR. They are treated as "workers" - more akin to helpdesk than to development, though development also gets treated this way, often. Basically, IT workers get treated like someone without an education, drive for knowledge, or experience in diverse environments - like a construction worker who has qualifications to operate certain machinery, and only that machinery.
      * Compare IT to (say) civil or mechanical engineering for a second. Even an engineer who is not in a supervisory position will get regular pay increases (ie, cost of living + experience + performance), and more often than not they're not working nearly as "hard" as an IT person (who is less likely to be salaried and have to do just as much or more self-improvement just to keep his job). The IT person is likely going to need to change jobs to get a pay increase, which itself costs money and time, making the proposition all the less appealing.

      I'm just curious (and hopefully someone out there can give a clue to this): what is the career advancement path to become a system administrator? A network administrator? As near as I can tell, the requirements are being a network/server/systems administrator already for 4-8 years and having taken all the requisite certification courses. There don't seem to be too many "junior sysadmin", "sysadmin documentation expert", or similar positions out there, which would seem reasonable to me if you want to have competent sysadmins (and be able to pay fewer sysadmins, as you're able to hire 2-3 "junior sysadmins" for the cost of a single sysadmin - and so on and so forth).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by gacl · · Score: 1

      "Oh, you hate your job? Why didn't you say so? There's a support group for that. It's called EVERYBODY, and they meet at the bar." --Drew Carey

    19. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Tell, since you want to wallow in the physical, does it count whether you get them pregnant or not and how often. Is double digits better than single or does it not matter whether you can achieve the same count as a jackass on stud achieves as long as you can make the same noise when firing blanks.

      For all the female computers geeks who want to achieve success in the field, I am sure the appreciate being relegated to being targets for e-stalking ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I was thinking about that just the other day when I saw a garbage pickup in my neighborhood. It used to be that garbage pickup involved a couple of dudes hanging off the back of a truck doing the unenviable job of hopping off and manually emptying trash cans. But I realized the other day that most garbage pickup today is largely automated (it's why they require you to use their special trash bins and set them out facing the road). I watched a garbage truck empty the trash bins of all the houses on my street without anyone ever even leaving the truck cab.

      I'm sure there are still plenty of places where manual pickup is still done. But, in my area at least, being a garbageman is not nearly as bad a job as it once was.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:Well, many IT jobs ARE boring by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      On the admin/networking side I have been a 'assistant network admin', it's a do it all spot that is less admin and more network engineer in most cases. I've also seen postings for 'junior network admin', I'd assume it's much the same. They funny thing of course is that those positions are rare. Also these jobs are fill ins for an actual admin for more than a few days usually. Most admins I've seen come from consulting (troubleshooting) or network engineering disciplines. I came from consulting myself before being a 'assistant network admin', the real issue is that these jobs are hard to get as experience is scarce. Also companies will use a particular technology in alot of cases that without having worked for another business (as the software costs more than the yearly admin salary) that uses it. This further limits things... You'd think this would inspire companies to pay more... But usually not. For my state (PA) it's ~50k/year average.
      If I had to do things over again... I'd have gotten a degree in photography... It's very techy these days with the change to digital and would make easily as much money...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  7. Oh come on now... by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Spair time?"

    Seriously, this is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Oh come on now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Sairiously, this is ridiculous. Fixed that for you.
    2. Re:Oh come on now... by NitroWolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously, this is ridiculous.

      Oh come now, you and I both know it's really rediculous ... Spair me.

    3. Re:Oh come on now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly won't be going into copy editing.

    4. Re:Oh come on now... by abigor · · Score: 1

      I know, it's a new nadir for article submissions. Maybe Slashdot should change their official editorial policy and start actually editing submissions, unless the intention is to reveal the submitters as the cretins they generally are.

    5. Re:Oh come on now... by jevring · · Score: 1

      It took this many posts for someone to react....

      --
      Move sig!
    6. Re:Oh come on now... by ShaunC · · Score: 2

      To be fair, most of us won't have any Spore time until September...

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    7. Re:Oh come on now... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Oh, the editors do on occasion edit submissions. This one, for example, had pretty much none of my original prose.

      Of course, soulskill was new back then, so maybe he hadn't learned yet.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Oh come on now... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I agree. Rather, IT is a stressful job!!! I'm so close to jumping ship for something that wont kill me of a heart attack early in life.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Oh come on now... by Rary · · Score: 2

      You missed one...

      Sairiously, this is rediculous.

      There. That's better.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    10. Re:Oh come on now... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with the open source world. Try spelling like that at Microsoft, and someone is likely to throw a chare.

    11. Re:Oh come on now... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Actually, It was 3rd or 4th post. Slashdot's threading just makes it look much later than it was.

    12. Re:Oh come on now... by pomegranatesix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, spair time. Different from despair time, which is when you're actually at work.

    13. Re:Oh come on now... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Certainly won't be going into copy editing.

      Speaking of boring jobs...I IS one!
  8. Spelling by ledow · · Score: 5, Funny

    "spair time"? Seriously, who edited or approved an article with that in the summary, not to mention the punctuation?

    Maybe THAT's why IT jobs are boring - you're required to spell!

    1. Re:Spelling by whencanistop · · Score: 1

      "spair time"? Seriously, who edited or approved an article with that in the summary, not to mention the punctuation?

      Ok, I may not be able to spell, but there is nothing wrong with my punctuation. Unless you are suggesting I have an overuse of commas. But then you've done the same in your comment and I am sure pots and kettles wouldn't come to mind.
    2. Re:Spelling by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps that (mis)-spelling was chosen because you can't spell despair without "spair".

      Which of course is what oh-so-many IT jobs are - a source of despair.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:Spelling by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Ok, I may not be able to spell, but there is nothing wrong with my punctuation. Unless you are suggesting I have an overuse of commas. But then you've done the same in your comment and I am sure pots and kettles wouldn't come to mind.

      Yeah, but he didn't submit a story to /. You should be held to a higher standard than a random commenter.

    4. Re:Spelling by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1


      Considering the concept of Syntax, IT and programming must have THE worst spelling requirements in the world!

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    5. Re:Spelling by Bodrius · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Slashdot can prove anything, it's that the IT industry has no grammar or spelling requirements.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    6. Re:Spelling by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      I believe it's because it was posted by timothy on Tuesday, and timothy would like to make it a known holiday by making every Timothy Tuesday a bad day. First its spelling, then it's grammar, and last its summaries abbreviated into 30 letter summaries.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    7. Re:Spelling by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I tagged this story with "despair". It's a good tag.

    8. Re:Spelling by whencanistop · · Score: 1

      Fair point - I'll take it as some sort of backhanded compliment.

    9. Re:Spelling by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I don't know... even apart from the misspelling this sentence still looks pretty ugly to me.

      Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spair time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?

      Anyway, you're entirely without excuse for spelling mistakes. Firefox has built-in spell check, and "spair" isn't even a word.

      Try,

      Increasingly people (especially young people) are becoming web-oriented with not only their buying habits but also in terms of how they spend their spare time. Wouldn't we expect more of them to want to get a career in it?
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:Spelling by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 1

      That is so through... ;)

    11. Re:Spelling by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      Isn't despair de old router in de closet?

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    12. Re:Spelling by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

      Which of course is what oh-so-many IT jobs are - a source of despair.
      Is that source under the GPL or BSD license?
      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    13. Re:Spelling by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Anyway, you're entirely without excuse for spelling mistakes. Firefox has built-in spell check, and "spair" isn't even a word. Well, if slashdot had a bit more modern discussion forum that, I don't know, actually let you edit your posts after you hit submit button, I'd suggest he/she is entirely WITH excuse for minor mistakes. If slashdot would invest some time in some human interface design and realize the placement of "submit" and "continue editing" are placed too closely together, I'd not give him/her a pass either. Given those two glaring shortcomings on the UI side, I'd say none of us are to fault for minor mistakes in our posts.
    14. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If slashdot can prove anything, it's that guys in their mothers basements shouldn't be commenting on the lack of grammar and spelling in the IT industry!

    15. Re:Spelling by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Well, if slashdot had a bit more modern of a discussion forum that, I don't know, actually let you edit your posts after you hit the submit button, I'd suggest he/she is entirely WITHOUT excuse for minor mistakes.

      Fixed it for you.

      Anyway, are you suggesting that a red underline somehow fails to communicate the idea that "this word is spelled incorrectly"? Or were you arguing that it's easy to overlook a red underline in a plain-text edit box?

      Really, it's pretty silly to claim the buttons are too close together. They are no closer together than any other submit/cancel buttons I've ever noticed... in fact, they're probably farther apart if you consider the fact that they are so big. It's nothing you'd have much chance of messing up as long as you were paying attention.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    16. Re:Spelling by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Really, it's pretty silly to claim the buttons are too close together... It's nothing you'd have much chance of messing up as long as you were paying attention. Good design doesn't require the user to have to pay attention. It is typical for someone who doesn't understand UI to blame the user when bad UI design is to blame. In this case, the best solution would be to move the two buttons far apart from each other, especially considering there is plenty of room to do so and especially because there is no going back if you click the wrong one. This is basic, basic UI and the lack of thought on the placement of these buttons is one of the most eggregious examples of bad UI I can think of at the moment (right up there with "shutdown" being under the "start" button).
    17. Re:Spelling by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Good design doesn't require the user to have to pay attention.

      Haven't you ever heard the saying "think before you speak"?

      Next, you'll be telling me that Slashdot should check your post for correct spelling, grammar, common logical fallacies, and clarity of concept, then make appropriate edits before posting it... it'd certainly be a tragedy if excessive levels of coherent thought went into one of your posts.

      Anyway, your post doesn't immediately get posted with "no going back". You have to click at least twice: Preview, then Submit. The purpose of a "preview", incidentally, is something along the lines of "read what you just typed and make sure it's what you really meant to say".

      Note, I'm not claiming that the UI is so easy to use that a drunk monkey could do it on a bad day. I'm saying that in this case, paying attention is a good thing, and too much hand-holding is completely unnecessary. (Should driving a car be so easy that a drunk can do it?) Slashdot's policy on edits is essentially that, in a nutshell: think about what you're posting, get it right the first time, and if need be, clarify in an addendum.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:Spelling by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Haven't you ever heard the saying "think before you speak"?

      I didn't have to think before I spoke, because "good design doesn't require the user to have to pay attention" is the mantra of good design. The less the user has to think about to accomplish routine tasks, the better the design.

      Anyway, your post doesn't immediately get posted with "no going back". You have to click at least twice: Preview, then Submit. The purpose of a "preview", incidentally, is something along the lines of "read what you just typed and make sure it's what you really meant to say". My gripe with slashdot is that after I preview my post, the buttons are not correctly placed, and even though I MEAN to go back and edit my post before submitting, I accidentally hit the submit button because the submit button is not displaced far away from buttons that have the exact opposite function (UI 101). The bigger problem with slashdot is the inability to edit your post after it is posted--a function that the other forums I hang out in all have--forums that are filled with some of the least technical people on the planet (drummers).

      One thing I've learned is that people don't like to hear problems from other people unless they can provide a solution. Here's mine--place a "Submit" button on the far right of the first box (giving the person the option to forego the Preview function if they are comfortable in their post. Then, if they do hit Preview, the Submit button remains on the FAR RIGHT. This serves two UI purposes. First, it makes it impossible to click the wrong button, by forcing the user to move all the way to the right to submit. Second, it maintains consistency by having the submit button in the same place on every screen (if they were to put the submit button on the first screen like described above).

      So there ya go, just because you see no problem with the current UI doesn't mean there aren't problems with it. No disrespect, but attitudes like yours (blame the user for everything, burden the user with poor UI) is the main reason most of the software and web stuff out there is a nigh-unusable mess.

    19. Re:Spelling by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I didn't have to think before I spoke, because "good design doesn't require the user to have to pay attention" is the mantra of good design. The less the user has to think about to accomplish routine tasks, the better the design.

      You miss my point: communication requires thought. Slashdot has plenty of morons already; why should it cater to their mental deficiency?

      The bigger problem with slashdot is the inability to edit your post after it is posted--

      This isn't changing. Just be more careful.

      No disrespect, but attitudes like yours (blame the user for everything, burden the user with poor UI) is the main reason most of the software and web stuff out there is a nigh-unusable mess.

      Please. You can't seriously claim that Slashdot is even close to unusable because of the positioning of the submit button. If you can't manage to hit a normal-sized button, maybe you need to play a nerdy game with lots of little buttons like Minesweeper until you're better with your mouse.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  9. And they would be right. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    We are all using X86 CPUs. It looks as is we will all use Windows or a version of Unix.
    Yea it has become a stable and rather dull industry.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    1. Re:And they would be right. by Rapidity · · Score: 1

      I expect it's only because no-one wants to do the dull job of writing compilers in assembler for any more platforms. I figure, this way, we can get to the interesting bits quicker. :D

    2. Re:And they would be right. by genner · · Score: 1

      Try supporting OS/2 for a while if your so bored.

  10. Well, it is boring. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Well, what do you expect? IT today is boring. It was exciting once, but today, it's routine. Especially at the lower levels.

  11. Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it strike anyone else as ironic that a site that proclaims that it delivers news for nerds appears to be accusing Bill Gates of making the IT industry appear nerdy?

    1. Re:Irony? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Does it strike anyone else as ironic that a site that proclaims that it delivers news for nerds appears to be accusing Bill Gates of making the IT industry appear nerdy? Not so much ironic as flat out stupid, but yeah, similar sentiment.

      As if the Woz was any less of a nerd, despite being so much less of an ass. We got pleeeenty of reasons to fume against Billy G, no need to invent new ones.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  12. What's IT? by qw0ntum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What's IT? I'm about to be a new grad. When I hear "IT" I think of tech support for a company, keeping machines running, or working in a data center. Those all sound pretty boring to me (except the last one, if the data center were sufficiently large).

    I'd rather do software development, CS research, something along those lines. Heck, my dream job would be working on low cost communication infrastructure in the third world. While I'm sure that all technically falls under the realm of IT, to me that's always be something different. Maybe that's just me, but "IT" to me has always been the boring stuff.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    1. Re:What's IT? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      It's all a generalization. I do "IT" and my current niche is perfect for my weird ass brain; I have different stuff to do all the time. I get to code, I get to work with hardware infrastructure and crazy high-end hardware. I get disaster recovery and security auditing and hardening. Minimal supervision, and a purchasing card with a daily limit so high I could buy myself a car.

      It's more about the job than anything else. My primary field of study was cognitive science, which deals with computers only peripherally. You get some skills, and then you find a job that you want to do, that uses those skills. Or one that you want to do that requires a non-specific degree, whatever.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's IT? I'm about to be a new grad. When I hear "IT" I think of tech support for a company, keeping machines running, or working in a data center. Those all sound pretty boring to me (except the last one, if the data center were sufficiently large).

      I'd rather do software development, CS research, something along those lines. Heck, my dream job would be working on low cost communication infrastructure in the third world. While I'm sure that all technically falls under the realm of IT, to me that's always be something different. Maybe that's just me, but "IT" to me has always been the boring stuff.

      to each their own cup of tea...
      I got my bachelor's in computer science. I found programming boring as can be, so when I got out, I stayed on as a systems administrator building servers / networks, etc. It's a heck of a lot of fun because you never know what that next phone call will bring!

      Maybe a pig will step on a laptop, or a printer is out of toner, you never know with the people I work for (ag research... yes there is a lot of IT in ag research).

    3. Re:What's IT? by bestinshow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's why any software developer/engineer/designer will never describe their role as IT. And I think that's fair enough really.

      Mentally, I think business IT - point and click Windows administration, network maintenance, exchange account setup, etc, as tasks that someone can be trained to do. You see adverts for IT training, and that's the type of stuff they're talking about.

      So yeah, there's a superiority complex if you actually studied CS, program for a living, know the insides and outsides of Unix and several languages, etc. Of course, you're still creating some internal business application for the most part ... Of course it helps if you actually get excited (mildly) by designing things properly, be they databases, program architectures, and so on.

      Outside people find it hard to see the difference, it's computers, innit.

    4. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's IT? I'm about to be a new grad.

      My company defines what IT is pretty well. On our department layout, we have one big department called IT, and under it we have two smaller departments called IT and Development. The IT subsection does what you listed above, and the larger IT section includes all the other, "not boring" things you mentioned. So, that's what IT is. Pretty simple, huh?

    5. Re:What's IT? by ktappe · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's funny--I'm the exact opposite. I think IT is (and sounds) much more interesting than CS. To me, CS was always those who only knew the theory but no practical implementation. The very word 'science' in it was an attempt to turn a field that has an awful lot of nuances into a studyable-phenomenon. Which was stupid because technology changes so fast that by time you've published a book on CS, it's outdated. IT is where you're involved firsthand--you're getting your hands "dirty" and learning the ever-evolving technology on the go, day in and day out. CS isn't like that--they are a layer removed from what's really going on as they attempt to come up with theories and see patterns. And that IS boring.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    6. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I definitely agree. I wonder how the question was worded. When I see "IT" in a job description, I'm not sure that I EVER see anything outside of system administrator type duties.

      That said, I also would have tried pretty hard to find something else to do if I knew I would be doing what I am now at my web development - "IT" - job. I've come to the conclusion that programming all day is one of the least healthy mental and physical activities for me to do, unless I get really lucky and work on something interesting (that only solves the mental part, of course). How much is this simply a common attribute of almost all jobs these days? It's hard for me to say.

    7. Re:What's IT? by WolverineOfLove · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I received my CS degree in May, and I am doing DBA / Web-Dev for a small business currently. "IT" to me is admin and maintenance work, which seems extremely boring to me. I'd rather be MAKING things than configuring software packages.

    8. Re:What's IT? by mkcmkc · · Score: 1
      IT is the new DP. That is, IT is the term people who have a businessy perspective on the world use to describe those computery things. It's "computers for suits".

      Those who are technically talented, at least the ones I know, regard this as a term of derision.

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    9. Re:What's IT? by Chirs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which was stupid because technology changes so fast that by time you've published a book on CS, it's outdated. Languages come and go. Data structure and algorithms don't really get outdated very fast. People still read Knuth, and 8-year old papers on scheduler algorithms still have useful information for modern OS's.
    10. Re:What's IT? by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I gave up trying to split hairs with non-technical people because of too many confusing conversations.

      "What do you do?"
      "Oh, I'm a software engineer"
      "Ah, IT type stuff"
      "No, I don't work IT, I'm a software engineer"
      *blank stare* "So, what's it like to work in IT?"

      So, to most people, if they want to call what I do IT, then so be it. For now, I only use my superiority complex on sys admins and other "business IT" people.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    11. Re:What's IT? by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 1

      Mentally, I think business IT - point and click Windows administration, network maintenance, exchange account setup, etc, as tasks that someone can be trained to do. You see adverts for IT training, and that's the type of stuff they're talking about. You must not administer a Windows network, or Exchange. If you did, you wouldn't be so quick to claim it is boring. Last week I setup our exchange server to output some data to a database, making it usable for other stuff. You probably don't understand what that means, but it's pretty cool stuff.

      Also your muted claim that Windows administration is not easy is way off base. This may be true for a company with 1 or 2 servers, but get to about 20-30 and you actually have to know something about system administration. You can't just point and click anywhere, you have to know what those actions accomplish. You do realize that the basic foundations of a network (DNS, DHCP, email, and so on) are the same no matter what the OS running the show?

      And have you heard of vbscript? Powershell? In the past two years I have probably written 10,000 lines of vbscript stuff to manage the network.

      I don't mind the MS bashing around here, but must you try to claim that I am not a geek/nerd if I work on Windows? Get over yourself.
      --
      I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
    12. Re:What's IT? by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Not to get into a pissing contest with the GP, but languages and technologies come and go. The theory they are based in, data structures, algorithms, computational theory, logic, etc don't change. Very rarely does something come along that shakes the very foundation of computing. Most of the time, its just the shiny veneer that changes (which is exactly how it should be).

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    13. Re:What's IT? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Well, it varies from basic tech support, to systems administration, to writing code, to architecting systems, to network maintainance, dealing with performance, security, ...

      What you are thinking of is probably business IT, which SUCKS.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    14. Re:What's IT? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Wow, vbscript huh?

      Hardcore...

      "Last week I setup our exchange server to output some data to a database"

      Last week I spent some time optimising the SQL analyser in our in-memory database and wrote an SSL protocol decoder in my spare time.

    15. Re:What's IT? by Budha_man_99 · · Score: 1

      I have a degree in security. I have spent numerous years doing support, keeping machines running and working in a data center. I finally broke down and got a degree, and instead of getting a general IT degree, I went for an IT degree in security. IT is such a large field that trying to say IT is just this, that or the other isn't fair. I realized that and focused in on security, something that isn't specific to support, keeping machines running or working in a data center.

      --
      Why do we correct our criminals but punish our children?
    16. Re:What's IT? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Utter rot.

      The second most popular language in industry after java (itself not exactly a spring chicken) is C. which has been with us since the 70s.

      Couple that with the theory of the underlying machines being roughly the same (though undergoing constant enhancement), the theory behind efficiency in data structures and algorithms being effectively a mathematical exercise, and language skills being very transferable.

      Compputer science is nowhere near as dynamic as your perception of it, nor is it removed from every day use. It is a science, there is also the related engineering discipline (Software Engineering), in which people like me (a CS grad in a typical job that CS grads end up in) apply their knowledge of computer science to real programming.

      A good course should teach you a decent amount of both.

    17. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > ag research

      antigravity research?

    18. Re:What's IT? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Doing things yourself often engenders a deeper understanding of what is going on. My real aim was familiarity with the TDS protocol, which I gained.

      Thanks though, next time I just want to do something quickly without learning anything at all I'll use this new "google" thing you seem to have discovered.

    19. Re:What's IT? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      You must not administer a Windows network, or Exchange. If you did, you wouldn't be so quick to claim it is boring. Last week I setup our exchange server to output some data to a database, making it usable for other stuff. You probably don't understand what that means, but it's pretty cool stuff.

      No, it's not. Administering a Windows network is never cool, and the only reason it is ever not boring is due solely to the frustration factor. After over half a decade spent supporting a ~1k PC windows network, when the CIO started talking to me about how the new personnel/payroll software rollout was the sort of thing "careers are built on," I ran screaming back to school as fast as my legs could take me. If you get fulfillment from such a banal use of computing resources, by all means go for it. Not saying you're not a geek, just that your job is boring. :)

      Also, Exchange is the devil. True story.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    20. Re:What's IT? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      That's why any software developer/engineer/designer will never describe their role as IT. And I think that's fair enough really. ...

      Outside people find it hard to see the difference, it's computers, innit.

      Sadly, even some "insiders" don't see the difference. When I finished my Thesis I went to go visit my old coworkers in the city gov's IT department. They asked what my plans were, I told them I figured I had done enough IT for my life, and the head developer looked at me and said "You got a Master's in Comp Sci and you're not going to work with computers any more?" "I'm going to work with computers, but I want to do Software Development." "Oh... But isn't software development IT?"

      To me the difference is an IT job is done in support of the business function of where you work, while a software development job IS the business function of where you work... I mean, even software development houses have IT departments, so obviously IT doesn't encompass all software development... :)

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    21. Re:What's IT? by dorath · · Score: 1

      What's IT?

      Great question. It's such a broad field, and so often every facet of it is just lumped together under the generic label of IT.

      Imagine this exchange: "What do you do?" "Oh, I work in cars." Cars (like IT) covers a heck of a lot of ground. You can assemble cars, create individual bits of cars, service cars, sell cars, drive cars, wreck cars, write about cars, and wash cars. There are many different types of cars too.

      But nobody (that I've ever heard, anyway) says that they "work in cars." These days I try to avoid the generalization of IT and make a point of being a bit more specific, unless I don't want the conversation to go that direction. Mostly because I think that IT sounds about as general as 'cars'.

    22. Re:What's IT? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      No, no, you only get geek cred for being on windows if you avoid tried-and-true microsoft solutions.

      If you're porting KDE to XP, you get geek cred. If you're running a RoR install on top of a Firebird database, on Windows Server, you get geek cred. If you click around microsoft management console, and know how group policies work, sorry, you get no geek cred.

    23. Re:What's IT? by ktappe · · Score: 1

      Utter rot. If you learned C (as I did) you're lost in today's C++, C#, Objective C world. It ain't the same animal. Further, who says programming languages are all that make up CS? They're a tiny portion of it, in fact.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    24. Re:What's IT? by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Which was stupid because technology changes so fast that by time you've published a book on CS, it's outdated.

      You're confusing software technologies with software techniques. The optimizations I use to make my web 2.0 apps faster are many of the same techniques that were used in the early 90's to make mac and windows apps faster. Avoiding server roundtrips, resource bundling to cut network overhead, compression, space/time complexity optimization. The techniques and theory hasn't changed much, and if you know the theory, picking up new technologies is easy as pie.

      CS isn't like that--they are a layer removed from what's really going on as they attempt to come up with theories and see patterns. And that IS boring.

      You do realize it's CS that builds all that "constantly changing" stuff you rave about right?

      Although I do agree with you somewhat. The "science" part of CS has very little to do with the practical realities of the job. And most of the people who actually build stuff don't communicate enough, if at all, with end users and support personnel.

    25. Re:What's IT? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      That's why any software developer/engineer/designer will never describe their role as IT.
      Not at all. I'm a highly paid, enterprise systems architect and I would describe what I do as "IT" in a general sense. I love my job. I get to design highly available Oracle database clusters (RAC) distributed across multiple geographic locations with hundreds of terabytes of online capacity and 99.999% availability and uptime. IT is just Information Technology. The technology that allows people to access information. It's a simple way of explaining to a layperson what you do on a daily basis. When someone asks what I do for a living, I tell them "I work in IT." If they want to know more, I could tell them I'm an enterprise architect and I design database servers and clusters for a living, but for a lot of people, just telling them "I work in IT" is enough.

      If you're not proud to work in "IT", whether you're a telephone customer support or helpdesk person, all the way up to a senior applications programmer/architect, you probably shouldn't be working in IT. Because no matter what you call it, you either like what you do for a living or you can't stand it. If you can't stand the name of it, you should probably get out.

      On the other hand, I could work for the garbage company and call myself a "sanitation engineer", but that doesn't change the fact that I haul people's trash for a living. In fact, I have occasionally called myself a "digital janitor" because sometimes we end up cleaning up other people's data messes, but that's just one way I have fun with my work.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    26. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must have missed the ex-windows-administrators meetings, where hundreds of MCSEs get together and talk about the mind numbing philosophy of Microsoft and an all Microsoft point and clickity click click shop.

    27. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to agree with this.

      I used to program. I loved programming. I was really good 10 years back when I stopped. I found programming in anything but a small company ends up pretty frickin' boring.

      I was lied to about a job 10 years ago and ended up doing admin.

      What do you know, before I quit, I find it's interesting! I meet people, I see *many* projects, I work on many things, and I still do a little programming here and there.

      There's a surprising amount of high-paying contract admin work, if that floats your boat and you're decent. I prefer a little less money now for a decent guaranteed cheque and benefits.

    28. Re:What's IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is "theoretical computer science".

      The practical side of computer science studies how to make the programs, languages, and tools that IT learns to use. Both are very important to the end user, but if you get a degree in automotive engineering, becoming an automechanic seems like a bit of a let-down, or at least that's why this study doesn't surprise me at all.

      As a metaphor: CS is to IT as automotive engineering is to automechanics.

    29. Re:What's IT? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      "If you learned C (as I did) you're lost in today's C++, C#, Objective C world."

      That's my point, it may seem like that's our world, but it isn't our world at all. In today's world you're just as well off knowing C. Things don't move on that fast and C is still the number two language. Personally I learned and have commercial experience of a variety of languages, but C is the one I'm most comfortable with.

      "Further, who says programming languages are all that make up CS?"

      Nobody. Which is why I mentioned that computer architecture is not shifting paradigms particularly quickly, and that efficiency of data structures and algorithms is effectively a mathematical field.

      Learn to read.

    30. Re:What's IT? by joleran · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think being able to say "fixed laptops after pigs stepped on them" on my resume would make it all worthwhile.

  13. Proofreading by coulbc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'd say timothy must find proofreading to be boring.

    1. Re:Proofreading by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not that, he just doesn't have any spair time.

  14. Spair?? by mpapet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I loose my mind!

    Seriously though. I don't know if I should be concerned or not. Part of being young is working with the mistaken belief they can become millionaires working for World Peace. (or whatever their heart's desire) Part of it also is they don't comprehend the complexity of the underlying delivery systems.

    Now, if the Bank of Mom and Dad does not sustain their magical thinking, then they'll get in line pretty fast once they have to choose between washing their clothes or eating.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    1. Re:Spair?? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 0

      Wait...you can wash clothes?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Spair?? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I wonder: would that get the smell out of them?

    3. Re:Spair?? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Which do you mean, the clothes or the IT grads?

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    4. Re:Spair?? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    5. Re:Spair?? by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      You might be loosing your mind.. or you could be loosing the dogs of war. You could also be losing your mind. Until I visited Slashdot I never knew so many people spelled LOSE wrong. Simple, If the leash is too loose, you may lose your dog. Yes, I'm a loser.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    6. Re:Spair?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for illustrating the fail that is capitalism.

      Caring nothing of human need, and accounting for only one deplorable aspect of human nature, greed.

    7. Re:Spair?? by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

    8. Re:Spair?? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      My choice: Ramen and hardware, FTW! I work with my hardware when I have cash, and write software when I don't.

      I'm a software development major, but I have a weak spot for playing with hardware; the more esoteric, the better. For instance, did you know you can pick up old SPARC boxes on the cheap for old used beat up ones?! One place calls them ugly duck specials... open case, previously abused... that saves me the first two steps with new hardware!

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  15. Of course IT is boring! by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it's not because it's nerdy (as the summary opines). It's simply because its about maintenance of poorly-designed shit. You might as well call it glorified janitorial work.

    In contrast, creating new stuff, as actual programmers and engineers do -- that's interesting!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    1. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but if your saying that the stuff people have to maintain is poorly built then wouldn't it mean that those things people are making are poor and ill-designed. I've worked both kind of jobs and the keeping it running job is a bit better than creating the ugly system

    2. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're given new and interesting things to code. Most of us (at least from my experience) are code firefighters, doing little else than monstrous amounts of bug fixes.

      But then again, maybe that's just because all the other programmers before me got too excited and forgot to actually code properly.

    3. Re:Of course IT is boring! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not necessarily.

      Wait till you get a programming job that consists of coding the same thing over and over for a series of your company's clients.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it's not because it's nerdy (as the summary opines). It's simply because its about maintenance of poorly-designed shit. You might as well call it glorified janitorial work.

      In contrast, creating new stuff, as actual programmers and engineers do -- that's interesting!

      So to sum up, maintaining poorly-designed shit is glorified janitorial work, but making new poorly-designed shit is interesting?

      Roger.

    5. Re:Of course IT is boring! by jmodule · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily.

      Wait till you get a programming job that consists of coding the same thing over and over for a series of your company's clients.

      Grief, I hope not. Please tell me management would at least let you customize the previous project for the next customer. Even better would be to write it modular from the get go, but I realize that often doesn't happen.

      --
      The jModule
    6. Re:Of course IT is boring! by nakajoe · · Score: 1

      Glorified janitorial work, or glorified data entry. I've had some "IT" jobs that consisted of little more than looking at a sheet of paper or a spreadsheet and punching data line by line into some poorly designed GUI.

    7. Re:Of course IT is boring! by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And it's not because it's nerdy (as the summary opines).

      Yeah, my favorite part was, "Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy?" Really? Bill Gates made it look nerdy? Like if not for Gates, the whole industry would be filled with badass cowboys and hot chicks or something?

      Yeah, even the fact that "badass cowboys and hot chicks" popped into my head as the opposite of "nerdy" is probably an indication that I'm an IT nerd.

      But yeah, I've found that at least the IT work that falls on the support/maintenance side (as opposed to the development side) is kind of boring crap-work. It's fixing problems that some other moron broke, and cleaning up problems caused by poor design. It's 2008, and we still don't even have decent backup/archive methods. Every product out there has huge problems and gaping holes in their functionality that should have been fixed 15 years ago, but instead everyone has been working on things like database-driven filesystems that never make it to market.

      That's right, I'm looking at you, Microsoft.

      InfoTech work isn't all science-fictiony and cool. Oddly, it's more like being a Fonzie in training. It's like all this technology amounts to a broken jukebox that has to be smacked in just the right way to get it going, and you're just hoping to learn how to do that so you can stand around looking cool until someone needs you.

      Except that this Fonzie never ends up looking cool and everyone treats him like a trained monkey. "Slap the machine and play me a song!" they all yell.

      Oh, yeah, I know I've jumped the tracks and gone into nonsense. Whatever. I work in IT. Making up random crap on Slashdot is the most interesting part of my day.

    8. Re:Of course IT is boring! by gazpatcho · · Score: 1

      Question: How to make your job exciting when you write software for a living?
      Answer: Never write tests for your code.

      You will always have little bugs to squash.

    9. Re:Of course IT is boring! by celle · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. I used to work on airplanes. It is truly boring working on thirty or more year old shit that should have been retired twenty years ago. I won't talk about what I've seen crawling out of those planes. I happily left years ago when the intense boredom of assembly line style maintenance, corporate tightwadiness, and the possible prison time for a mistake, finally got to me and utterly crushed my loyalty and caring for the public. Now I won't go near airports or planes since I now know what's going in them and the people that work on and inspect them.

    10. Re:Of course IT is boring! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Ah, perhaps I should have been more clear. The projects do indeed get customized, but there's no time (understaffed and overworked) to make anything truly modular, so each project is pretty much the same task, just done to fit the particular client.

      IMO there's nothing less fulfilling than doing something that you know is unnecessary and inefficient, on TOP of being the same general thing you did last week

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    11. Re:Of course IT is boring! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      In contrast, creating new stuff, as actual programmers and engineers do -- that's interesting!

      In the context of sitting in your room on a 40-hour codathon over a weekend, yeah, it's great.

      When your "creations" are the bastard children of Cthulu and Management "ideas" however, the mantra of the Scary Devil Monastary* comes to mind...

      * "Down, not across"

    12. Re:Of course IT is boring! by pebs · · Score: 1

      Wait till you get a programming job that consists of coding the same thing over and over for a series of your company's clients.

      That would give you the opportunity to create a framework to make all the repetitive stuff faster/easier.

      --
      #!/
    13. Re:Of course IT is boring! by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      instead everyone has been working on things like database-driven filesystems that never make it to market

      I know that was a metaphore, but such a thing actually has made it to market. Look no further than BeOS' BeFS. And it has been open-sourced as OpenBFS.

    14. Re:Of course IT is boring! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The guy writing the code should never be writing the test measures. It's that whole checks-and-balances thing our Software Engineers and Programmers never understand...

    15. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      I generally use a loop in the circumstance.

      for loops are one's I find particularly useful, but do....while loops hold their own too.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    16. Re:Of course IT is boring! by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it is time to write a code generator.

      Seriously. When you job hands you repetitive projects, figure out how to make the computer do the repetitive part. That's what it is there for.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    17. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All work ultimately devolves into maintenance, unfortunately.

      The problem is that you, the engineer, work on creating some spiffy program. You decide to use an incremental approach so you can show progress to your superiors. Naturally, you work on the core functionality first: the most important requirements, the ones that everything else depends on. So you quickly end up with a minimally-functional product with a lot of bugs, rough edges, and painfully manual administration (doing database INSERTs and UPDATEs by hand because the tools to automate them aren't done yet, for example). That's the point where your boss starts "reprioritizing" you: basically, assigning you to fight fires. Progress on your project slows, and your boss tells you to put it in production now even though it's not ready. People start using it, it gains momentum, and now you can't make any nontrivial changes. Since the product is released, you are no longer allowed to work on it (it has no budget or timeline associated with it any more) unless something goes wrong. At which point you are, of course, the only one competent to fix the problem, since none of the automation/debugging/troubleshooting tools which you intended to write are finished (or even started). Forget about documentation, that's a "phase two" item. ("Phase two" when it comes to software is a lot like fusion power. I've had phase twos which have been "three months from now" for over two years.) And because you're spending so much time fighting fires that only you can fight, when your next project comes around, the "reprioritization" will happen sooner still. Eventually, you'll get fed up at spending your entire day working your ass off simply to slow the rate at which everything is falling apart and quit. Then the guy they hire to replace you gets dropped right on top of the shitball you left for him, and he starts bitching about "that asshat who wrote poorly-designed shit."

      It's the most frustrating thing by far about being an engineer. I want to work on a product until I feel proud of it. But I always feel like I'm on the verge of being fired for incompetence because they don't allow me to finish it. I know that if I were in charge, I certainly wouldn't tolerate such piss-poor products. I guess the difference is that I'm a believer in "Do one thing, but do it well." Whereas my superiors are all adherents of the "Do many things poorly" school.

    18. Re:Of course IT is boring! by crono_deus · · Score: 1

      Really? Bill Gates made it look nerdy? Like if not for Gates, the whole industry would be filled with badass cowboys and hot chicks or something?

      Yes.

      (Come on. This is slashdot. We blame him for everything. Current thought is that without Gates and Microsoft, we'd have invented a transporter, a holodeck, and would be out cruising the stars and picking up hot alien chicks by now.)

      --
      Ne Cede Malis.
    19. Re:Of course IT is boring! by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's the most frustrating thing by far about being an engineer.

      No, it's the most frustrating thing about being a programmer. If you were an engineer, you would have been given the resources to build the thing correctly, because you're legally liable for it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's not because it's nerdy (as the summary opines). It's simply because its about maintenance of poorly-designed shit. You might as well call it glorified janitorial work.

      In contrast, creating new stuff, as actual programmers and engineers do -- that's interesting!

      Very very true. In corporate world there are 2 category of programmers - "janitors" and "shitmaker^Wdeginers". And janitor's job is really boring sometimes, while "design" is actually always fun.
    21. Re:Of course IT is boring! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Of course Programming is boring!

      And it's not because it's nerdy. It's simply because its about maintenance of poorly-designed code. You might as well call it glorified janitorial work.

      In contrast, creating new network layouts, increasing performance on a cluster, having N different desk jobs plus a little manual labor for variety, as actual systems and network engineers do -- that's interesting!

      Be here next week for
      Of course CEO work is boring!

      And it's not because it's nerdy. It's simply because its about maintenance of poorly-designed businesses. You might as well call it glorified janitorial work.

      In contrast, cleaning up toilets, waxing floors, stealing things from people's desks, using a computer left logged in to access naughty sites, as actual janitors do -- that's interesting!

  16. Of course it's boring by Overd0g · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All you do is sit and type all day and have absolutely no respect from society. It's worse than being an accountant.

    1. Re:Of course it's boring by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Eyup. The most respect you get from someone is their hopes that you might actually be able to fix the fuck-up performed on their computer by the guy down the street.

      Imagine their utter shock when they hear that you want to charge them to fix it, and that it'll cost more than $50!

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  17. Is this news? Is this bad? by swm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA:

            Non-IT graduates think a job in IT would be "boring,"
            despite its good career prospects.

    IOW:

    People don't enter fields that they aren't interested in.
    Film at 11.

    1. Re:Is this news? Is this bad? by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think it goes a little beyond that. I think paleontology would be really interesting, but I have no desire to learn the biology that comes with that field.

      Same with some of the theoretical math and physics, but I don't have the strong math background to do that.

      The overall view of our field as boring probably just means that it's not generally understood what we do. Probably related to the view of computers and IT as a utility rather than a department.

  18. As opposed to... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shit, I wish my job was boring. When something breaks it gets so exciting I worry that I'm going to keel over dead.

    Anyway, the damn snowflakes need to suck it up. What entry level job isn't boring? You put in your crappy dues, so that you get a better job down the road. I've worked all kinds of jobs, and they're pretty much all boring, even things you wouldn't think would be boring. I did a stint doing wildlife tagging, where I got to roam around on a four wheeler shooting things with a tranq gun, and that was astoundingly boring...99% of the time you just sat and waited and let the mosquitos gorge themselves on your blood.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:As opposed to... by Bandman · · Score: 1

      It depends on the day, but my job is boring probably half the time. At least, boring as would be considered by non-IT people. Fighting low-level fires is pretty mundane for the most part. The really interesting problems, or the ones that stretch your knowledge are the good ones. They just don't come along that often.

    2. Re:As opposed to... by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      I did a stint doing wildlife tagging, where I got to roam around on a four wheeler shooting things with a tranq gun Awesome! Where can I sign up?

      astoundingly boring...99% of the time you just ... let the mosquitos gorge themselves on your blood. This activity can also be lots of fun - if you like Tabasco sauce.
    3. Re:As opposed to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and that was astoundingly boring...

      Yet it sounds so exciting!

    4. Re:As opposed to... by DerekLyons · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Shit, I wish my job was boring. When something breaks it gets so exciting I worry that I'm going to keel over dead.

      Lord yes, I used to love boring when I was in the Navy. When there is 300 feet of ocean between you and fresh air, and excitement means an anti-radiation suit or breathing apparatus or hoping to hell a seawater pump actual works at its rated capacity... you learn to appreciate boring like it was a fine wine.
    5. Re:As opposed to... by TenBrothers · · Score: 1

      What entry level job isn't boring? Off the top of my head: Prison guard Police officer Firefighter EMT ...all of which require that new-to-the-job be in service, in the field.

    6. Re:As opposed to... by kingmetal · · Score: 1

      My entry level IT job is pretty exciting most of the time. I think the trick is to break into the industry way too young, work for a big company in the entertainment industry and be in way over your head most of the time. I also suggest getting a degree in something like audio production and then working front-line desktop support. All jobs are boring, and it's not your career's responsibility to entertain you. I've managed to keep myself busy and entertained at remedial retail jobs - there's always another level to achieve, so if you're bored then do something about it. But then again I barely graduated college and I certainly didn't put the time and energy into a CS degree. I suppose if I slaved away for 4 years I would feel like I deserved a better stint than what most entry level jobs are. I would be wrong, but at least I would understand the sentiment.

    7. Re:As opposed to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's the problem now.. many companies have demonstrated they are perfectly happy to fire people and outsource jobs. I don't know anyone that is willing to "put in your crappy dues, so that you get a better job down the road", because they're just as likely to be fired for no reason.

  19. Surely!!! by mtconnol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely with the number of young people who crave their very own automobile, you would have a large number who want to become mechanics! read: consumption of a commodity != desire to produce commodity. If it did, I would be in the petroleum business.

  20. Thank goodness by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Back in the late 90's/early 2000's WAY too many people were jumping into IT because it was the new field du jour which was supposed to make those starry eyed high school kids (some even drop outs) rich with no real effort. Them oversaturating the industry with underqualified and uninterested workers half-killed IT over here. It almost felt unfair working on my Computer Science degree with people who flat out hated computers and always wanted to copy each other's programming projects to pass classes, simply because they though that was the way to go for a good job. The industry could use a bit of thinning out if it means that we're left with actual bright and enthusiastic people who really do like doing this type of work.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Thank goodness by BoyIHateMicrosoft! · · Score: 1

      I completely hear ya on that one!!! When I started school in 2002, the signed me up for a computer networking degree because they told me programming wasn't for girls. They said women had a better success rate as Network Administrators. Anyways I had to take it because it's all they offered at night and I couldn't quit my full time job. Anyways to your point, and mine for that matter, I went to school with this lady who's only reason for getting into computers AT ALL was because the school promised to find her a 40,00 USD per year job when she got her bachelors. She was ALWAYS begging me to do her programming and basically all of her homework. People like that were all over my school. I had this strong urge to create a virus and give it to one of them as their programming homework and see if they could ruin the school's computers. Never did though. Didn't feel like going to jail and all. The lady I went to school with now is a substitute teacher and hasn't worked in IT ever. So glad she got to go to school free and I had to pay.

    2. Re:Thank goodness by myenigmaself · · Score: 1

      Agreed, and beyond that a little thinning of the herd makes developers less of a commodity. Cash money.

    3. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%.

    4. Re:Thank goodness by Bandman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, I was one of those people, sort of. I went to college for computers because I was good at them, and I liked the "magic". After a decade spent working on computers, I half-wish I was done. I make decent money being a sysadmin, and I think I may be able to retire a little bit early, but as for my day-to-day existence, I no longer love computers, or even like them. Aside from my work laptop, I don't even have one at home. Don't want one. I'd rather read, or cook, or learn something non-computer-related. I guess I'm just burned out.

      I still do my job, and I have a lot of interest in learning new things I can use at work, but it's not from any sense of personal fulfillment. It's more from a desire to build a stable system that won't wake me up at 3am. I haven't worked on a project for myself forever (unless you count my blog, and even that is blogger.com). I just don't have the fire anymore.

    5. Re:Thank goodness by cowscows · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the reality is that "doing it for a living" is a good way to drain the fun out of almost anything. I enjoy building things out of wood. For about a year or so, I made custom furniture for people, and that's how I got the money I needed to eat. I did not enjoy woodworking all that much for that year. Now that I've been working in a different field for a few years, I've spent a good portion of my disposable income on building up a decent woodshop, and it's once again a hobby I enjoy. *shrug*

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    6. Re:Thank goodness by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Not wanting to do something at home when you do it for 40 hours a week at work doesn't necessarily mean you don't enjoy it anymore. I haven't worked on any personal software projects in quite a while, but I still enjoy what I do at work. Even with things you enjoy, there's a limit to how much time you want to spend on them in one day. When I leave work at the end of the day, I'm either doing something with other people (friends and/or significant other) or I just want to relax at home (usually consisting of about an hour for making/eating dinner, an hour or two of TV, an hour or two of games, an hour or so of reading, and scattered minutes checking email, message boards, etc.).

    7. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I was one of those people, sort of. I went to college for computers because I was good at them, and I liked the "magic". After a decade spent working on computers, I half-wish I was done. I make decent money being a sysadmin, and I think I may be able to retire a little bit early, but as for my day-to-day existence, I no longer love computers, or even like them. Aside from my work laptop, I don't even have one at home. Don't want one. I'd rather read, or cook, or learn something non-computer-related. I guess I'm just burned out.

      I'm one of those people who got into computers and programming when I was 9 years old. After 10 years of working as a software developer I am not even close to burnt out, I am even more interested then ever and continue to work on projects in my free time (which I manage even while living with a needy girlfriend).

      I *am* kinda of burnt out on maintenance tasks, though. At my job we don't have a dedicated sysadmins and I occasionally have to do sysadmin duties. I can handle it ok, but its not very much fun, and I'd much rather be doing software development. I can't imagine having that as your full-time job would be very much fun.

      Sometimes changing jobs can also make things more interesting.

    8. Re:Thank goodness by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amen to that. I fancy myself a half decent photographer. People ask "Why don't you do that instead of software engineering?"

      Because I enjoy it, and want to keep enjoying it. Once you make a living on a creative process you enjoy, it's not a hobby anymore, it's just work.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:Thank goodness by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Man, that's excellent.

      I envy the sheer number of formative years you had with the computer.

      My family couldn't afford one until I was in high school, in 1996, and even then it was a WalMart special (IBM Aptiva 486 DX2/66), but it was like a new world to me.

      I understand your predicament with your job. I don't want to do low-level user support, but I'm the only IT guy we've got in the company, so I end up doing everything from SAN maintenance to debugging peripherals. It's a load of fun ;-)

    10. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of those people who got into computers and programming when I was 9 years old. After 10 years of working as a software developer I am not even close to burnt out ...


      OK, so you're 19 years old, and you've been working in computers/IT for 10 years.

      Check back in us when you're 39 years old, and you've been working in computers/IT for 30 years.

      I'd bet dollars to doughnuts, you'll be in a different industry/career.

    11. Re:Thank goodness by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I went to college for computers because I was good at them, and I liked the "magic".

      Me too. Then I understood how they worked, they lost their magic, and I got seriously disappointed. I considered changing career paths (I was still studying), pretty much abandoned any own software projects, and resigned myself to a programming job I wouldn't like. Funny thing is, I found that I liked building the "magic" for other people just as much as I did trying to figure it out. What drives me now is building stuff that "just works".

    12. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am right there with you. I really enjoyed computers as a kid and optimizing my 640KB of RAM to make my games run on my 286 @ 16Mhz (turbo button!!)

      So I was good at computers and because of that I kind of fell into the career. I didn't really have exposure to a lot of other options before I decided what to do. 10 years later I'm kind of at that point where you are. I am not really interested in computers except as my survival instincts dictate. I stay up on the tech and do what needs to be done cause it pays the bills much better than anything else I have the ability to do right now. Like you I only have my 1 work laptop at home.

      I'm really wondering though if I just see the grass as greener. I wonder if I had an idea for a different career I'd just end up in the same place not really enjoying it 10 years from now.

      Who knows?

    13. Re:Thank goodness by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      The industry could use a bit of thinning out if it means that we're left with actual bright and enthusiastic people who really do like doing this type of work.

      All "hot" industries are effected by this. This is The Tragedy of the Commons. This caused the tech crash of 2001 and the real estate crash of 2005.

      Ultimately, by guiding people into roles where they must "earn a living" even if they don't enjoy/understand their domain, it ruins economies. This is why I like the goal of paying them better to do (intellectually) easier work so they can stay off my lawn in the advanced technology arena. Of course, greed also ruins economies, so *allowing* people to take advantage of temporary economic booms in certain fields is bad, too.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    14. Re:Thank goodness by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      He didn't say he was 19. He said he started programming when he was 9, and has been WORKING as a developer for 10 years. I seriously doubt anybody counts their time spent tinkering as a kid/teenager as work experience. I also started programming at around 9 years old, and I certainly don't.

      Counting that as 10 years work experience, I'd put him somewhere between 28 and 32 (28 if he started work straight out of high school and 32 more likely if he got a degree). I can say as a 26 year old developer, I don't see myself doing anything else. And I'm actually the youngest person in the department where I'm at. The next person above me in age is 32, and above him everyone else is over 40, all having been in the industry for decades. It's not uncommon.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    15. Re:Thank goodness by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      It almost felt unfair working on my Computer Science degree with people who flat out hated computers and always wanted to copy each other's programming projects to pass classes, simply because they though that was the way to go for a good job. The industry could use a bit of thinning out if it means that we're left with actual bright and enthusiastic people who really do like doing this type of work.

      I'm normally more worried about the people who dont hate computers. Most people with a genuine interest can rattle off a hateful list of grievances with modern software in their sleep. Just as much as it is the "dont care" people, it's the varieties of "shiny object" idolatry so many techies have that has kept computers from getting better in the last 10 years. Enthusiasm is not enough, we need critical eyes to re-evaluate how to do things better.
    16. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what. The late 90s/early 2000s were about a decade ago. Everyone from that period who is going to be thinned out has been thinned out.

      How much longer do we have to read this BS from old-timers who think the dot-com era is recent history?

    17. Re:Thank goodness by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Naw, what you do is put a timebomb into the code, that is set to go off after the due date for the assignment. Give her the code with just enough time for her to quickly run it, and see that it works.

      But, by the time the instructor gets around to grading the assignment, said instructor will instead of getting the expected output, get something along the lines of "I stole this assignment" as output. :)

  21. The truth is not stranger than fiction by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    "Despite good job prospects, graduates think that a job in IT would be boring. Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy?"

    Could be because "IT" includes mundane jobs.

  22. Um qualified even? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just b/c these younger people buy and live online does not mean they're in any way qualified to work in IT. Sure, they might not be interested, but lets not make an unnecessary connection that they should be in IT b/c they grew up with a mouse at the end of the umbilical cord.

    1. Re:Um qualified even? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Bash.org has a quote relevant to everything ;)

  23. not really by moankey · · Score: 1

    Boring no, repetitive yes.

    I suppose repetition could lead to boredom.

    Ok nevermind.

    1. Re:not really by geekoid · · Score: 1

      To me, repetitive is boring. There is no intellectual challenge in repetition.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:not really by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Boring no, repetitive yes.

      I suppose repetition could lead to boredom.

      Boring no, repetitive yes.

      I suppose repetition could lead to boredom.

      You're right.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
  24. It is by Thelasko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy? It is nerdy. Also, from my limited experience in the area, most of the tasks are repetitive.

    My limited experience was installing new machines in an office building one summer. For the first few weeks, I imaged disks. This consisted of reading The Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide and pushing enter when prompted. The rest of the summer was spent teaching people how to use their new machines. I'm sure there is more to it, but I have a suspicion most of the work is dealing with PEBKAC.
    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:It is by Bandman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It depends on your position.

      To me, interesting would be finding a way to not have to press enter all the time.

    2. Re:It is by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is more to it, but I have a suspicion most of the work is dealing with PEBKAC. I'm going to offer you a piece of advice which applies to pretty much all IT systems, be they software or hardware.

      If the user is consistently running into the same sort of PEBKAC problems, in my experience that's 70 or 80% because the software is lousy to use and 20-30% because the end user is either stupid or ignorant. I'd be willing to gamble that if my figures are out, they're out in the direction of "I'm being too hard on the end user" rather than "I'm being too hard on the system".

      Apple understand this. So do Canonical.

    3. Re:It is by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      They mostly involved the transition between MS Office 97 and Office 2003.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    4. Re:It is by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that the software being lousy isn't something you can fix. For instance, the OP replied to your message saying that most of his problems were with the change in MS Office versions. You can say what you want about MS's software, but if you're just a peon working in some company, you're probably not going to convince them to dump MS and use open-source instead. You're stuck working with whatever crap the higher-ups choose, because some sales person took them out to lunch and schmoozed them with bullshit about why their product is worth $3000 per seat. They're certainly not going to be given the time and resources to create or modify any software.

      If it were my company, I'd dump MS Office in a heartbeat and use OpenOffice, but for most IT people, they can't make that call, so they have to deal with the crappy software they're given. The only thing they can really do is try to pick a job that has as little bullshit as possible.

    5. Re:It is by jimicus · · Score: 1

      When I read posts like this, I am glad that I am the IT manager and the business I work in is small and agile enough that I can talk to my end users to find out what they want rather than just thrust something at them.

      Though to be fair I've worked as a cog in a much larger IT department and in my experience the great majority of poor purchasing decisions within IT come from project managers who don't understand IT, the business or both. Those at the very top don't say "we're buying THIS", they delegate a project to find a solution to the problem.

  25. Good job prospects? Wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have enough fingers and toes to count all the IT folks I know that are unemployed or underemployed right now. This article is more mystifying than all the "engineering shortage" bullshit I've seen thrown around.

    yeah, there are jobs out there if you want to make a crappy salary and work in a military regime. If not, might as well go for a different line of work.

    1. Re:Good job prospects? Wtf? by RichMeatyTaste · · Score: 1

      How about moving?

      RTP (Raleigh/Durham) is home to Cisco, Microsoft, EMC, NetApp, Red Hat, Lenovo, IBM, Symantec, Biotech, Epic games, Etc, Etc. Unemployement hovers below 5%, and there are always good paying IT jobs available. You may get a little less at first (the penalty for job hunting remotely), but give it a few years and things will right themselves.

      --


      Ever feel like you are driving the getaway car?
  26. Who cares? by gsslay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "But over 60% of non-computing students do not wish to enter the sector because they think it will be boring."

    Who cares what non-computing students think? I can think of dozens of other job sectors that I suspect would bore me stupid, that's why I had the sense not to study for qualifications in them.

    I suspect that these graduates all have a nasty shock coming to them anyway, courtesy of real life. Most jobs are "boring" in some way. That's why you get paid to do them rather than doing them for fun.

    1. Re:Who cares? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      I imagine if you ask most people why they went into field Z and not fields A through Y, the answer is that they thought they'd be boring, or something along those lines. Especially graduates - you want to be out there doing tree surgery, that's what you're really excited about, and management or high energy physics or engineering sound dull to you.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Who cares? by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I am sure that most fields look pretty boring to outsiders. I'm presently an accounting graduate student, but my undergrad major was history. Most business students seem to think that history would be a pretty boring area. Evidently, few people consider both history and accounting interesting at any level.

    3. Re:Who cares? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Because non-computing students aren't the only people who go into IT and, I would say, are probably the students a smart employer might most want to avoid.

      Why? Simple: people who have incredibly narrow interests and take a vocational approach to their education are seen as more likely to have a limited angle of approach to any situation. Why take someone who only knows how to write code when I can have someone who knows how to write code AND has demonstrated the ability to learn other things? Anyone who's being interviewed will have the requisite skills to do the job (or be trainable to do the job) so why NOT get the person who's got more abilities?

      As someone who used to do an awful lot of hiring of people for IT positions, my experience was that the people who came from eclectic educational and work backgrounds tended to be much, much better hires than the people who were mono-focused on technology. Aside from being able to approach problems from a variety of different angles due to their broader experience, they also were, frankly, MUCH more interesting as individuals and as much as some people here want to say that the social environment at a workplace should not be a relevant factor in hiring, it is. If I spend 8-12 hours a day with people, I want that time to be as pleasant to be around as possible.

      IT managers should actually be very concerned about this. The best potential employees are being turned off to the careers, meaning that the people who'll be filling the potential positions are going to be the ones who don't seem to be able or willing to do anything else. Scary!

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    4. Re:Who cares? by kingmetal · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone else caught onto this. Did you know that 99% of killer whales do not wish to enter the IT field as well?

  27. Over 60% by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    From TFA, But over 60% of non-computing students do not wish to enter the sector because they think it will be boring.

    That means about one-third of the non-computing students think IT is exciting.

    Nothing to see here, move along....

  28. Low unemployment and kids these days by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is what happens when you have 5% unemployment over a sustained period of time. In my neck of the woods, where unemployment is even lower, high school kids have their pick of summer jobs. They learn they can be picky about where they work.

    This is not necessarily a bad thing (low unemployment is better then the alternative) but it does bring with it a certain attitude in the young.

    Those young whippersnappers should try haying in 95 F (35 C) weather. They would learn to appreciate an IT job, I tell ya.

    1. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man, I've done haying in the middle of August, and yes, it does suck more than finding WTFs in code you're maintaining.

    2. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The federal government has been revising their methods for calculating unemployment for years. If you calculated it the same way you did 20 years ago you'd probably get something more like 10%. One example of these revisions is excluding people who have been unemployed for a certain amount of time (the "discouraged" people).

    3. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too funny but absolutely right. I once worked a few weeks at Apple back in their heyday doing RMAs which basically meant taking a computer out of one box and putting it into another. Oh so incredibly boring! Being an EE is at times boring but far better than that or hauling hay! :)

    4. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens when you have 5% unemployment over a sustained period of time. In my neck of the woods, where unemployment is even lower, high school kids have their pick of summer jobs. They learn they can be picky about where they work.

      This is not necessarily a bad thing (low unemployment is better then the alternative) but it does bring with it a certain attitude in the young.

      Feel free to elaborate on what's intrinsically wrong with this "attitude" you mention.

      As far as I can tell it's called not wasting your life as a wage-slave. If you can't even find an occupation you can live off of AND enjoy, don't bother with the subsequent obligations like marriage and kids.

      Most people seem to have that reversed; they buy the "perfect life" (i.e. suburban bubble) on credit and then work themselves to death in a job they hate to pay for it afterwards. Those people are damned fools.

      (Are we seriously rehashing the Generation-X debate?! I mean, really!)

    5. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by nakajoe · · Score: 1

      After growing up on a farm and then doing IT jobs for some years, I've come around and also learned to appreciate haying in the hot sun. The sweat and blisters and dirt give me a feeling of instant-gratitude accomplishment that IT rarely does. These days I do a lot of heavy physical labor after work and on weekends voluntarily, something I'd have never done back on the farm.

    6. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Although manual labor can certainly suck at times, at the end of most days I could find something that didn't exist in the morning, but does now, because I built it (I worked construction). Now I sit in front of a computer all day designing buildings, and I just don't get that same sense of satisfaction from the screen-full of drawings that I did when I actually hammered stuff together.

      Also a couple weeks ago the A/C in the office was out, and if I'm going to be subjected to 90 degree weather, I'd much rather prefer to be doing something active in those conditions than trying to sit at a desk and focus on a computer screen.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    7. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I missed the part where I said it was "wrong".

      I did make fun of it, although I also made fun of geezers who brag about the bad old days (e.g., me).

      Go pick a fight somewhere else.

    8. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      When I hayed, I weighed 130 lbs. The wet bails (which I quickly learn to identify) weighed as much as I did.
      Today most haying appears to be mechanized, and I think that's a good thing.

    9. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by AutopsyReport · · Score: 1

      Never heard of a 130lb wet hay bale since all hay is very dry, typically less than 20% moisture, otherwise it will start to ferment. The only wet bales I've tossed around were rotten.

      The cutting, raking and baling of hay is mechanized, but when it comes to unloading and stacking small square bales, it is very much a hands-on job across the world. That's why round bales and large squares are so popular - no labour required.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    10. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I once worked a few weeks at Apple back in their heyday...

      I don't get it, you still work there then?
    11. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      I was kidding about a bale weighing 130 lbs. Maybe 50 lbs. To a scrawny teenager they just felt like it.

      But some bales out in the field were definitely wet, and they're weren't rotten. Could have used more drying time I guess.

    12. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      10%?

      I'd say it's a bit higher than that, still. There are a LOT of people who are only "partially employed". A LOT. Consider not only the people who have been out of work for a long time, but also those taking worse jobs for less pay. Or people who can only find short-term contract work. And so on and so forth...

      I'd say the figure (if you include things like people who were previously "professionals" of one stripe or another who are now doing things like phone support and credit card telemarketing) would be more like 20-25%.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      I'd say the [unemployment] figure (if you include things like people who were previously "professionals" of one stripe or another who are now doing things like phone support and credit card telemarketing) would be more like 20-25%.
      So, if you include people who are employed in the unemployment figures the unemployment figures get higher? I am in absolute awe of your ability to distort your perception of reality. It's just utterly mind-boggling. Even politicians wouldn't be so utterly brazen. Here comes the clue stick. Written on the side in really big letters is this: people with jobs are not unemployed.
      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    14. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by SombreReptile · · Score: 1

      Well my first summer job here in Canada was at the beach scraping ice off of surf boards. Made me appreciate my IT job

    15. Re:Low unemployment and kids these days by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No. But people who are under-employed would certainly skewer the statistics if they were included, and they aren't.

      A case of someone who is college educated in a scientific field who can only find menial work is an example of underemployment.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  29. Oh come on! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computers were nerdy WAAAAY before Bill Gates came on the scene.

    Seriously, BillG gets way too much recognition and way too much blame. All he is is an obscenely rich, lucky bastard who happened to be in the right place at the right time and played his cards just about perfectly.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Oh come on! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot really needs a "+1 Bitter" moderation. :-)

    2. Re:Oh come on! by StarReaver · · Score: 0

      Would that be "+1 Bitter" or "-1 Bitter"?

    3. Re:Oh come on! by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      He's more like a very shrewd, aggressive businessman who understand technology enough to exploit it.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  30. Ummmmm.... by rindeee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not a big fan of Bill, but blaming him for making IT look nerdy....? C'mon. I think we as a community handle that pretty well ourselves.

    1. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should Blame should be placed on George W. Bush...

    2. Re:Ummmmm.... by strings42 · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I was in the IT business in the late 70's, before Bill's name was even on the radar, and IT was nerdy even back then, I can promise you. Of course, this is Slashdot, so evil must mean Microsoft ...

    3. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to agree with you on that one. Any grads (myself included) who read /. hear mostly bad things about IT jobs.

    4. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not as though nerds were an endangered species prior to Bill Gates becoming successful. Try looking at some old photos of "IT" guys from back in the day -- and count the number of scruffy-looking bearded hippies and MIT geek stereotypes. Bill didn't start the wave -- he was riding the trend of slovenly dressed, antisocial, self-important asshattery just like everyone else.

    5. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to agree *loads up his AI gf*

    6. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about this?

    7. Re:Ummmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a big fan of Bill, but blaming him for making IT look nerdy....? C'mon. I think we as a community handle that pretty well ourselves. Hey, if you can't blame Bill for something, then you just aren't being creative enough.
    8. Re:Ummmmm.... by Geminii · · Score: 1
      The problem with Bill wasn't that he made IT look nerdy, it was that he made it look obscenely profitable. As a result, IT became the new 'doctor/lawyer' for a while, with undecided kids choosing it (or having it pushed on them) because people thought there were automatically huge dollar signs involved.

      Thus the huge wave of people not really suited to IT who washed into the industry, hung around for a couple of years, and washed out again once reality bit. The remnants are still plodding along in the boring, entry-level jobs that no-one else wants, and may well stay there for the next twenty-five years.

  31. they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are some exciting jobs in IT. Unfortunately they fill fast, so the vast majority of us are stuck with the tedious ones. (CareerBuilder is filled with database administration jobs. Frown.)

  32. Passion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What entry level job isn't boring? You put in your crappy dues, so that you get a better job down the road. I've worked all kinds of jobs, and they're pretty much all boring, even things you wouldn't think would be boring.

    Well, you get folks like Steve Jobs and other employers who only want folks who are passionate about their work. It's really hard to be passionate about something you don't like. You can't have it both ways. Either pay your dues and be bored with a sucky job, or do something you're passionate about.

  33. Thank god for Slashdot by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 3, Funny

    or the day would drag on for even longer.

  34. Good money for creative work in decent conditions by bestinshow · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly many IT jobs are boring, consisting of pressing F5 repeatedly on various websites throughout the day.

    Some jobs within IT are very interesting, because they are creative and require actual brain utility. Programming is the obvious example. Hell, even coming up with good configurations for sysadmin can be interesting. Point-and-clicking windows admin stuff must be dire though, and is probably where this negative image is coming from.

    In much the same way as I find car mechanics boring, I can see why some people would find programming boring, because they don't appreciate the creative aspect. However being paid a reasonably good wage in an in-demand industry to sit inside at a computer is pretty damned good, even if you don't get to ride a road crusher or steamroller, or fly fighter jets (which I imagine is pretty boring for the 95% of the time you are on the ground actually).

    Oh, and memo to students: Work is that boring thing we'd rather not do that allows us to pay the bills, buy that exciting car, buy that house to do up, eat that thrilling meal with friends and have a great time, etc. Get over it, but if you do stay away, demand will surely mean higher wages for us already in the industry.

  35. yes it is. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the first 20 years, being a developer was cool. You were a hero, you worked during emergencies, you had a bit of freedom as a result, the pay was decent- never superior unless you became a contractor. And there is/was a problem with constantly becoming obsolete and having to retrain a lot more than other professions.

    I finally left to be project leader and then a team leader. I see my developers suffering from the boredom.

    It's mostly SOX. It's also a view of developers as generic by management. Executives do NOT WANT heroes. They want grey reliable processes that consistently take 3 times as long (and are not random between 1/10th as long and 10 times as long without anyway to predict it).

    Programming in business is just not fun like it used to be. It's okay- but you code about 1/10th as much as you used to because of all the paperwork overhead. And you are a LOT more accountable. this is a good thing for slackers but it stifles the good people.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:yes it is. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "You were a hero, "

      Apparently you also had a inflated self worth.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:yes it is. by bestinshow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree totally.

      So go work for a startup which desires hero developers, doesn't care about business processes and paperwork or project plans, but might have a few late nights. Preferably a startup with decent funding from a parent company. As soon as the timesheet filling requirement arrives, leave.

    3. Re:yes it is. by Bandman · · Score: 1

      It's still possible to be a hero, it's just that you have to sort-of use a different definition ;-)

    4. Re:yes it is. by revlayle · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know what programming jobs you have... mine in the past 16-17 years has have been at least 60-75% coding most of the time... sometime we do spec writing or documentation. Of course, there are meetings that take up about 15% of my time.

      I also still extremely enjoy software development... maybe why I always go for the senior dev position instead of project management or IT director-like positions

    5. Re:yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the first 20 years, being a developer was cool. You were a hero, you worked during emergencies, you had a bit of freedom as a result, the pay was decent- never superior unless you became a contractor. And there is/was a problem with constantly becoming obsolete and having to retrain a lot more than other professions.

      I finally left to be project leader and then a team leader. I see my developers suffering from the boredom.

      It's mostly SOX. It's also a view of developers as generic by management. Executives do NOT WANT heroes. They want grey reliable processes that consistently take 3 times as long (and are not random between 1/10th as long and 10 times as long without anyway to predict it).

      Programming in business is just not fun like it used to be. It's okay- but you code about 1/10th as much as you used to because of all the paperwork overhead. And you are a LOT more accountable. this is a good thing for slackers but it stifles the good people.

      Once of the things that has changed in the last 20 years is the growth of Software as an actual engineering discipline as opposed to being something done in an ad-hoc, on-the-fly manner. As such Software Engineering is a meticulous, precise practice that can be often tedious and hard. Oh well.

      Of course, it's hard. If it wasn't hard, everyone would do it. Its the hard that makes it great." -Tom Hanks -A League of Their Own

    6. Re:yes it is. by ztransform · · Score: 1

      And you are a LOT more accountable.

      The word accountable made me think about a parallel I feel between the Accounting profession and the Software Development profession.

      In many ways I feel that software development is largely now a commodity, something that will always need to be done, much like every business needs accountancy services (some business employ Accountants directly, some choose to contract out the services).

      That's not a bad thing, however - whilst Accountants are perceived to be boring, no one disputes that they are necessary and that their profession is worthwhile. Software Engineering might not be as "nerdy" as it once was, and possibly less exciting than in the early days, but it is still no less worthwhile a career to enter.

    7. Re:yes it is. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      If you were the only person that could get the computers to work, you WERE a hero. It has nothing to do with what he thought of himself, it has everything to do with how developers were treated in the boom days. And even now in some smaller shops.

    8. Re:yes it is. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well the context is that programming isn't fun in general.

      I agree there will always be some exceptional places.

      In my experience with startups/small companies...
      HIGH degree of freedom
      LOW accountability (which drives you crazy if you get shackled to a loser on a project)
      POOR pay short term relative to
      HIGH hours worked (lol- they provided a friend of mine cots and dinner in his office).

      ---

      I have friends for whom the freedom and the coolness of working with a bunch of hotshots makes up for the bad parts.

      For me, I left that in 2000 and now am a salary man. I stopped building my own PC's in 2003. My last java coding was in 2006. That system will be thrown away in 2013 to 2015.

      The tech side just isn't worth it. It changes every 3-6 months and the compensation doesn't cover the risks and "on-call" / after hours work.
      And my wrists can't handle hands down development any more.

      More power to people that still enjoy it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:yes it is. by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      I am bored almost out of my mind. And I get to do algorithm development too, not just coding.

      Its largely a kind of alienation....the illusion of being a part of a team is long, long gone. Even feeling like a cog in a big wheel would be a significant improvement. Work is more like being a part of a food chain - a tool for people above you who want to climb the salary scale.

      Maybe this is nobody's fault, I don't know. It seems like it has happened to nearly everyone.

      I'm hoping there are still niches I can find later where the magic isn't all gone, but this is probably wishful thinking.

  36. Most jobs are boring by Brain-Fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

    Life requires labor. Civilized life requires even more labor. Most of that labor is unpleasant in some way. We face the grind anyway, day after day, because it keeps the ball rolling, and because it gives us the money we need to do the things we actually like doing.

    If you manage to find a job that you actually like a lot, that's great. If not, hopefully you will be strong enough to accept the realities that most people face, get a boring job, be useful, and earn a decent living.

    1. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bandman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've always found that it pays to like boring jobs ;-)

      It's only rarely that we admins get to do heroics.

    2. Re:Most jobs are boring by Surt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think that's true. I've always thought fortune 500 CEO would be really exciting and fulfilling, and yet you have to pay those guys a fortune to do the job. Maybe it sucks a lot more than I thought.

      On the other side of things, it seems like 'janitor' or 'farm hand' would pretty much maximize boring/unfulfilling, and yet those guys get paid next to nothing.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Most jobs are boring by ktappe · · Score: 1

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      You have a point that the more exciting and fulfilling the job, often the more the employer makes use of that fact and lowers the pay. The most recent example, from just last week, is how Apple pays $20K less per engineer than Google and other valley competitors. Apple jobs are apparently exciting and fulfilling. But it's not a boolean. Pay can vary between 0 and 1 (that is, low to high). So that doesn't, per your axiom, equal no pay. Just lower pay.
      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    4. Re:Most jobs are boring by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Skill is a crucial dimension. I don't think that professional sports are boring or unfulfilling, but my batting average would likely be dominated by zeros, as would my basketball score, and I'd probably be crippled after one or two runs up the middle in football.
      Of course, major leagues are probably the exception proving your point, as a glance at the amount of minor-league, semi-pro, and college athletes there are in circulation shows.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20 says...

      The reason the "patch" to qmail did anything was that the patching process included a stop/restart cycle of the application. I'd bet that all you needed to do was bounce the daemon.

      You can send my cash as a donation to the anonymous coward's fund international, in my name.

    6. Re:Most jobs are boring by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 0

      So you don't count like Parachute Instructor, Demolitions Specialist, Concert Stage Crew, or Film Star as jobs? I think the opposite of what you say is true and that everyone has both an talent for a certain job AND a interest in a certain job the luckiest ones of us have both in the same category. I personally love working in IT, yes it gets frustrating but the worst days don't get as bad as every day would be if I did anything else (except maybe Parachute Instructor that actually sounds really cool). This article shows a good thing happening, a shortage of labor supply in a skilled market makes all of us more valuable.

    7. Re:Most jobs are boring by qbzzt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Me too. But I haven't always valued money the same way.

      Alone in your early twenties is a good time to chase after fun experiences and short term payoffs. Your money needs are relatively low, job security in a nice to have, and independence is new and exciting.

      Wait eight years. Add a mortgage and a couple of kids. Get used to the independence. Suddenly a stable job that pays the bills sounds a lot better. You've done enough exciting jobs and short term payoffs, and now you need to think it terms of decades.

      Most IT jobs aren't so complex that you have to start right out of college. You can do something else and change jobs.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    8. Re:Most jobs are boring by COMON$ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them. Actually this is incorrect. We pay people to do jobs to attract a certain level. The more complicated/responibility a job the higher the salary rate. It has nothing to do with excitement, otherwise a machine worker would make top dollar.

      If you are going to be a paycheck hunter and just find a place to put your time in. You are in for a very unfulfilled life. I specifically chose IT because it is enjoyable, therefore in my mind I really don't work. I get paid to do the things I would be doing anyway. There are a plethora of positions like this out there.

      You pay people because they have certain needs they want met and you exchange their time for the ability to meet those needs. So the idea that we get paid because a job is not exciting or fulfilling is just plain wrong.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    9. Re:Most jobs are boring by Original+Replica · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most IT jobs aren't so complex that you have to start right out of college. You can do something else and change jobs.

      True with a caveat or two, you will still start at close to the "just out of college" salary, and it jobs have to exist here in this country. If Americans find it too boring, then companies will have to find somewhere else that really wants the jobs. It happened with customer support, it now looks like it will happen with IT, when telepresence robotics takes off it will probably happen with garbage collection, taxi driving, and long haul trucking.

      --
      We are all just people.
    10. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I'm not betting you at all. Like I said in the comments, it's been 8 years ago. No clue what the issue was.

      I'm willing to bet they wouldn't have let me bounce the server without a reason, though

    11. Re:Most jobs are boring by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      This is also true of many non-profit or social work jobs. By and large social workers get paid dirt, but they are so aware/fufilled-by of the need for someone to what they do, that they do the job anyway. Until they burn out, but by then the next crop of social work grads is ready to fill the gap.

      --
      We are all just people.
    12. Re:Most jobs are boring by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 1

      ... and yet those guys get paid next to nothing. There are more factors than just 'fulfillment' in the job market.
      Take Skill for example.
    13. Re:Most jobs are boring by blueforce · · Score: 1

      Amen. We'll continue our unpleasant labor to earn that decent living.

      The movie stars and professional athletes, on the other hand, can continue to eke out the meager living that's due them based on the unpleasantness and difficulty of their thankless professions. It's a shame that our civilized society labors for a decent living while they suffer so.

      --
      If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
    14. Re:Most jobs are boring by Swizec · · Score: 1

      Some of us actually love what we do even though it's seen as boring to just about everyone else. Hell, I've been into computers and programming for over ten years now and I'm only twenty.

      To be perfectly honest, by know I'm probably so hardwired for software I can't do anything else even half as well ... thank I like it huh?

    15. Re:Most jobs are boring by daedae · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, some IT outsourcing is happening, but after a while I think it'll slack back off. I've talked to several people about IT--courtesy those assumptions that "computer scientist" = "IT specialist"--who say IT outsourcing is frustrating and ultimately inefficient for their companies. One woman in particular complained that their main corporate office was in NYC, but all of their tech support was at the time (sometime in 2003 or 04) based somewhere in India. Evidently, they weren't making the IT guys work a schedule compatible with any of the American offices, and also didn't check for a sufficient command of English, so it was next to impossible to get any useful help in a timely manner.

    16. Re:Most jobs are boring by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I used to feel that way.

      Pushing 30 now, and getting that "Impending doom" despair as I realize that I love programming as a hobby.

      As a profession, though... well, some days, it makes me want to drive off a bridge.

    17. Re:Most jobs are boring by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      You cannot assube because tis your premise that that is the conclusion. Apple pays $20K less per engineer because they can. Could be due to prestige, or it could be that apple is just good at flogging people. They also charge a LOT more for their products because of the name they have built.

      Google is a very enjoyable place to work from what I hear so if your premise is correct then they should pay less as well.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    18. Re:Most jobs are boring by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think you've hit on the entire point of the article; educated people don't want to work "labor" jobs like IT because they are boring. Once we start making enough money to cover the basics, it is human nature to look to move up to the next level of need, which in this case is job satisfaction. Every exciting job requires pay, because without pay, the most exciting and rewarding jobs on the planet suddenly lose a lot (cough, all) of luster.

      Boring jobs don't exist because people want to have boring jobs. They exist because some people have to take whatever they can get. Faced with collecting trash or resetting passwords all day, I'll gladly reset yours to the default.

    19. Re:Most jobs are boring by harshmanrob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree 100%. I am IT Security soon getting my GSEC cert (already have my Security +) and this job has the highest level of suck that one could possibly imagine. I have to interact with managers, my own manager is constantly changing the directives and fakes "rah rah" speeches about "security the company". At the end of the day I could really give two fucks if the place got hacked or not.

      What is funny is the best time I ever had with IT is when I was coding/developing/programming only to learn that that was "shit work" to be outsourced. Kinda nice when I was running a division of a help desk after that, only to learn that to was "shit work" to be outsourced. Turns out they cannot outsource security work and policy management due to ethical reasons. But I consider the position "SHIT WORK!". What I do now is SHIT WORK! And the last time I checked SHIT WORK WAS SHIT!

      I would NEVER suggest or recommend an IT career to anyone at this point. The article is WRONG. The work is not just boring, it is SHIT WORK.

    20. Re:Most jobs are boring by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Parachute instructor? What do you train a parachute to do?

    21. Re:Most jobs are boring by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always found that it pays to like boring jobs ;-)

      Which is why Oracle and SQL DBAs are paid so well.
    22. Re:Most jobs are boring by lortho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...hopefully you will be strong enough to accept the realities that most people face, get a boring job, be useful, and earn a decent living.

      Come on, seriously? Is that really your response to a young college student who's mulling over career choices and happens to think one may be less fulfilling than others? "Well, life sucks, so quit whining and pick up a shovel?"

      Man, if this is the attitude students are running into when they talk to people in IT, it's no wonder they're wanting to avoid the field like the plague. Way to inspire passion in the youth, folks. Bravo.

    23. Re:Most jobs are boring by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Wait eight years. Add a mortgage and a couple of kids. Get used to the
      > independence. Suddenly a stable job that pays the bills sounds a lot better.

      Wait ten more years. You'll find out you hate it more and more every day, culminating in what is known as the "midlife crisis", where you quit your lousy boring job, get a backpack, and go live on the Appalachian trail. Human beings are not suited to being cogs in a machine. Yes, you can tolerate it for a while, but eventually you'll go nuts.

    24. Re:Most jobs are boring by bradinthehouse · · Score: 1

      Wait eight years. Add a mortgage and a couple of kids. Get used to the independence. Suddenly a stable job that pays the bills sounds a lot better.
      I don't get how being tied down makes a person more independent.
    25. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when telepresence robotics takes off it will probably happen with garbage collection, taxi driving, and long haul trucking. Don't forget pizza delivery.
    26. Re:Most jobs are boring by qbzzt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to take breaks and do other things, otherwise you do go nuts. I take an evening a week to write stories on my own.

      However, being bored at work isn't enough reason to ditch your kids. If you decide to have children, they need you to work to support them and they need you to figure out how to stay sane doing it.

      BTW, even a boring job today is a lot more varied than the farming jobs most people had two centuries ago. We're just spoiled.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    27. Re:Most jobs are boring by qbzzt · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't get how being tied down makes a person more independent.

      It doesn't - I wasn't clear enough.

      When you're just out of college, the fact that you live on your own without any supervision is new and exciting. You want to stretch it to the limits and see what you can do. Eight years later, it's something you're used to. Nothing to get excited about, just like the ability to see or read the internet isn't something you get excited about.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    28. Re:Most jobs are boring by bioradmeister · · Score: 1

      This is because there are a lot of folks who could be a farm hand, but not a lot of folks could be a CEO. If you are not convinced, take a trip to your local Walmart.

    29. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bandman · · Score: 1

      That's a rough hand you've been dealt.

      I don't think it's all shit work, but there are definitely a lot of shovels being handed out.

      If you liked developing, maybe you could leverage your experience into another full time coding job?

      Also, unless you're burned out, you might try something like Rent a Coder and freelance, just to use those programming muscles again.

    30. Re:Most jobs are boring by Illbay · · Score: 1
      Add a mortgage and a couple of kids.


      And maybe even a spouse!

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    31. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with most priced services in an economy, it comes down to supply and demand. The price is affected by both ends of the stick; and the extra wrinkle in our discusion is that the demand is affected by not just interesting vs. boring, but how many people are qualified. IT jobs are high in demand; the fact they are considered boring reduces the supply, which should increase their salary more; however, you don't need a 4-year CS degree, so the supply might still be greater than it is for software engineers, which is why on average the latter makes a higher salary. In the case of fortune 500 ceos, not many people are truly qualified ( insert anti-corporate joke here ) to do the job; they won't look at you unless you have an extensive track record at presumably successful businesses. So, the supply is much lower. With the janitor, the demand is fairly high, but the supply is also very high due to all the low-wage workers that are unskilled and basically have resigned themselves to a boring job; they just want to survive.

      However, I'm sure there are some subtle effects out there as far as what causes society to value certain jobs over others; it'd be interesting to see which jobs are over/underpaid compared to their supply and demand calculations, and perhaps there is more influence than one would expect. How this might work is, people may think they only deserve to be paid $X due to a low-status job, and so the employers are able to set a lower wage for them than the calculations would predict.

    32. Re:Most jobs are boring by Aazzkkimm · · Score: 1

      "Parachute Instructor"

      OK parachute, when someone pulls on your cord you open. Got it?

      --
      Desire is not an occupation.
    33. Re:Most jobs are boring by cowscows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, that's the response, because that's reality. I'm not saying it to crush their hopes and dreams, I'm saying it because that's life and they need to ready for it. I have a cousin who's about two years our of school, and has left at least three jobs already because "they were making her do work she didn't want to do." She's an interior designer, and she was always upset that these companies that she's worked for wouldn't let her sit with paper and colored pencils and sketch restaurants and hotel lobbies all day. Instead they have the gall to make her do boring things like draft in CAD and calculate square footages and stuff like that.

      Never mind that 90% of the work that needs to be done to get a restaurant designed is "stuff like that". You have to do it on every project, and it sucks every time, but it has to get done and someone has to do it. It's not a particular quirk of any industry, pretty much every job is like that. Especially when you're just starting out.

      The working world is not like college, and to convince yourself or someone else otherwise is not helping them, it's just setting them up for inevitable disappointment, and time wasted while they get over their denial and figure it out. My cousin seems to have accepted that reality, and is hopefully willing to put in the time and work necessary to work her way up the food chain until she can set her own job description. But she's a couple years behind on that track than she would've been if someone had been honest with her and not pretended like life was going to be all sunshine and rainbows.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    34. Re:Most jobs are boring by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Yah, but back then you didn't have to listen to twenty cube mates talking on the phone, some idiot in the kitchenette barking mad laughter at some cute girls antics trying to get laid...

      You got fresh air, birds chirping, sunshine (and rain and snow)... and all the efficiency your OWN hands could produce.

      Granted you died at 50... but who's to say that's not any better than our sealed boxes of unproductive futile commercialism of today?

    35. Re:Most jobs are boring by element-o.p. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, but here's the situation I am in:
      I have worked in IT for ten years. At my previous employer, where I got my break in IT, I found that working as a sys admin in a fairly large company was becoming increasingly unrewarding due to mismanagement and being pigeon-holed into a subset of the tasks we had all shared earlier. I left for a better position in a smaller company where I once again had the opportunity to learn a lot of new skills and could break out of the rut that I had been in at the previous job. Now the company I work for has been bought out by another large company, and it's looking like they are trying to figure out which pigeon-hole the other IT guys and I fit into within their organization. The work load has dropped to nil, and, well, I'm bored again (thus, posting on /.).

      At this point in my life, I am seriously considering going back to my first love -- flight instructing. I've taken a part-time job as an instructor, and I've decided that if things don't work out in the new parent company (i.e., if they decide those of us from the smaller company are no longer needed), I probably won't search for a new job in IT. I'll probably flight instruct full time and maybe take a part time job teaching C.S. at the local college. Throw in a little part time IT consulting, and I'll think I'll probably still be financially secure, but a lot happier than I would be in an environment like my first IT position.

      You can be happy and financially secure; just think a little outside the box. In today's economy, it's probably a better idea to work a couple of part time gigs than put all of your eggs in the single basket of one job where you could be outsourced/laid off at any time.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    36. Re:Most jobs are boring by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      Why is it that everyone complains about mortgages and kids, and then goes out and gets both? Me? No kids. Ever.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    37. Re:Most jobs are boring by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      I didn't complain about them. I love the kids and they're the best thing ever to happen to my wife and me. But kids are labor intensive.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
    38. Re:Most jobs are boring by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      I often feel that when people say: "The kids are the best thing to ever happen to me," they're doing so out of a combination of "post-purchase rationalization" and the desire to make sure that the kids never know that they would have been happier without them.

      God, I know my parents would have been happier without me and my sister...

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    39. Re:Most jobs are boring by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Add a mortgage and a couple of kids.


      And maybe even a spouse!

      HEY! I just finished eating! >.<
    40. Re:Most jobs are boring by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is true. Google is able to label/tag their image database, because it feels good to play those Google games.

    41. Re:Most jobs are boring by jaykali · · Score: 1

      In college everyone is looking for the job that pays a lot where you don't have to do much and you get a lot of time off. Thus far I'm not sure such a job exists. I think an earlier comment was correct in that what ends up happening is young ppl bounced around traveling and picking up short term jobs that amuse them for a bit and eventually when they need MONEY they end up having to settle down and pick up a real job. And who's to blame them? I spent 2 years in China after college, didn't make any money and I think I've done alright for myself.

    42. Re:Most jobs are boring by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      ...or 2, but I doubt that my girlfriends would appreciate it.

    43. Re:Most jobs are boring by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Maybe you are underestimating our biological imperatives.

      A lot of the people I grew up with now have kids, and they all think their kids are the best thing ever to happen to them. Even those whose personal finances are going thru some rough times.

      I guess does that don't are the deviants.

      --
      No sig
    44. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except most starting IT jobs aren't really boring. Most starting level IT jobs are horrible, soul-sucking, life-destroying, gauntlets of low-wage serfdom. When I first started out I couldn't believe people would return to work after a month of this. Since then I've revised my estimate downwards.
      There are many times that I have wished to have my arms and legs hacked off, have my body stripped naked, covered with honey, and half-buried in a fire ant hill instead of returning to work.
      Why?
      At least I'd only have to endure that torture once.

    45. Re:Most jobs are boring by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      If your biological imperatives told you to jump off a bridge in order to impress potential mates, would you do it?

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    46. Re:Most jobs are boring by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Insightful
      totally dude.

      The problem is, when they hit a midlife crisis, rather than do something MEANINGFUL, like bug out of the rat race, they instead dump their wives and kids for a trophy girl, get drunk a lot and spin their way into debt on a sports car and trinkets for the trophy, like this fat idiot and his bleeth.

      when faced with a crisis, people tend to panic, and they don't always make the best choices when they're flopping around like fish on the existential beach.

      Me? I turned 40 and flipped out, but instead of the bleeth and the car, I talked with my wife, went back to school and got into academia... teaching university is incredibly intense, but lots of fun, and now we're a happy family living and teaching abroad. Yay!

      RS

      But sometimes I wonder about the sports car...

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    47. Re:Most jobs are boring by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      Another reason why people pay to have something done is becuase they can't/don't want to do it themselves or to gain specific advantage from someone's labour. This means that people who can do something that many people can't may get paid to do something that they would have done for free anyway so that one specific person or group gains advantage from their labour. Many artists, mathematicians, analysts and people from many walks of life enjoy what they do for a living. I happen to love my job and I am still quite pleased that I can get paid for doing things I would have done anyway. I always advise people to find a way to make money from their passion rather than spending half their day doing something else to fund it.

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    48. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      ...the "midlife crisis", where you quit your lousy boring job, get a backpack, and go live on the Appalachian trail.

      That might be what the hippie contigent does, but for most, they need to keep their relatively high-paying job to be able to afford the sports car and mistress and then the alimony. I thought a mid-life crisis was a rebellion against being tied down, i.e. wife and kids and familial responsibilities, and having to sacrifice for them, not boredom at work.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    49. Re:Most jobs are boring by Omestes · · Score: 1

      be useful

      Huh? To whom?

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    50. Re:Most jobs are boring by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      Then why do actors get paid? Stunt professionals? Sky diving instructors? Et al.?
      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    51. Re:Most jobs are boring by Hasai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ....It's only rarely that we admins get to do heroics.

      As a very wise Army officer once said, "Behind every hero is someone else's screw-up. I don't want any heroes today."
      ];)
      --

      Regards;

      Hasai

    52. Re:Most jobs are boring by agent1999 · · Score: 1

      Nice comments by a yuppie propeller head

    53. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like the ability to see or read the internet isn't something you get excited about. Clearly you're not looking at the right websites.
    54. Re:Most jobs are boring by genner · · Score: 1

      Most of the admins I know play WOW and raid heroics at least once a week.

    55. Re:Most jobs are boring by genner · · Score: 1

      That would explain all those people who died after saying "Hey babe hold my beer and watch this".

    56. Re:Most jobs are boring by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Well, if it were REQUIRED to jump off of a bridge to reproduce, we'd either jump or go extinct, right?

      I guarantee you that if jumping off bridges was a biological imperative necessary to the act of reproduction, that cute little saying you used wouldn't exist, EVERYONE'S parents would have jumped off of bridges, and NOT jumping off of bridges would be considered abnormal behavior.

    57. Re:Most jobs are boring by hobbit · · Score: 1


      I hope you were being tongue in cheek about remote driving: start with a boring job, add latency, take away direct personal consequence, and you have a recipe for disaster!

      I think that for similar reasons IT jobs will continue to be performed onsite -- communication, including giving someone a bollocking, is much easier face to face.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    58. Re:Most jobs are boring by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Life also requires sex, and working in IT security, I haven't seen a woman in weeks :-(

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    59. Re:Most jobs are boring by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      No the telepresence driving wasn't a joke, I think it will be heavily combined with automated accident avoidance programs like those coming out of DARPA's robot vehicle programs. Heck, the outsourced driver might be managing several vehicles at a time. Real life effectiveness has to get pretty bad before it starts to overrule cost effectiveness. All priorities to quarterly profits!

      --
      We are all just people.
    60. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bandman · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to remember that.

      Thanks!

    61. Re:Most jobs are boring by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      My advice: Live on half your income. Invest aggressively with the other half, until your investments are paying a dividend yield of about $12k/year. That's enough money to live comfortably in much of Asia or South America. Take a break from work for a year and just do your own thing as you get it out of your system.

      Once you are done preemptively stopping your midlife crisis, go back to work for real money if ya really want to.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    62. Re:Most jobs are boring by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      You can be happy and financially secure; just think a little outside the box. Ironically, any use of that foul cliche "think outside the box" is an indication that the corporate world has sapped the last remaining original thought from your head, rendering you unable to.... ah, well, you get the idea :-/
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    63. Re:Most jobs are boring by sleigher · · Score: 1

      Maybe, my mother would certainly have been better off without me, and way more successful. I would certainly be far more wealthy, both money and free time, without my kids. However until you have kids of your own you will never really know. I dreaded the thought of having kids. It was the last thing I wanted and thought my life was over. Now that a few years have passed and I have a boy and a girl I realize how enriching the experience is. One quote I read a long time ago stands true today for me, "You never truly know what love is until you have children." You can call this post-purchase rationalization all you want but until you experience what I have you won't really know.

      --
      All points of time and space are connected.
    64. Re:Most jobs are boring by tsm_sf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the companies I worked for experimented with outsourcing some of their coding gruntwork. It was a great setup if everything went smoothly, but the timezone lag on communication meant that any problem added a day to the project. We also found that, especially in India, the companies that had stellar reputations weren't significantly cheaper than local talent.

      On the other hand, one of my friends runs a company in Germany that relies entirely on outsourced coding, and he's making a mint. He's also a master at preparing project specs and timelines, requires little sleep, and is closer to the coders time zone.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    65. Re:Most jobs are boring by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      yawn....

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    66. Re:Most jobs are boring by bvankuik · · Score: 1

      I don't think it works that way. People still go bankrupt every day. That is because they need to make their own mistakes.

    67. Re:Most jobs are boring by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      If Americans find it too boring, then companies will have to find somewhere else that really wants the jobs. It happened with customer support, it now looks like it will happen with IT, when telepresence robotics takes off it will probably happen with garbage collection, taxi driving, and long haul trucking.

      It's already happening and has been happening the last 10 years. (You don't suppose the teens growing up have noticed THAT trend, do you?) At first, I wondered if this article was just some propaganda for the, "look--we need more H-1B workers to do the jobs"!

      First off it's a survey of non-IT graduates (so who knows what degree they're actually getting, i.e., music appreciation) and less than 10% of the total surveyed felt the "benefits of an IT-based degree had been effectively communicated to them at school." Forget benefits, how about what work they can do with an IT or related degree? I'll bet most think of computer programmer and that's about it.

      I think job futures are better communicated today--when I grew up they gave you an aptitude test in high school and you sat with a guidance counselor who probably didn't know any more about the outside world than you did. Now people take their kids to work and companies are getting involved in schools much earlier instead of waiting until you've graduated only to find out there's no jobs in your field or you dislike the work. But at times you don't realize that what you like to do might mesh with a different career choice. More needs to be done on explaining what jobs are out there now, what's likely for the future and what's needed to get there. I know several people when I entered college went into the oil industry which was doing well at the time (late 70s), but by the time they got out, the boom went bust and they had degrees, but no jobs to be found. But that's the nature of that industry. Just like the Internet boom and bust. You've got to find that bleeding edge (especially in technology) and ride it for as long as the wave goes and be able hopefully see what's coming ahead enough to make quick changes when necessary.

      Yes, tedious jobs pay the bills, (unless they can hire unskilled, illegal labor to do it!) But I feel to really be a success you must get some joy or satisfaction out of what you do. Otherwise you'll turn into a clock-in, clock-out nimrod who does enough to pay the bills and hope to keep from getting fired.

      Ironically, at the bottom in the related links, was the story IT staff wasted on non-strategic 'chores'. Maybe the survey members saw that article!

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    68. Re:Most jobs are boring by Chemisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I thought a mid-life crisis was a rebellion against being tied down

      No, a midlife crisis is about taking a look at your life and finding it wanting. We all have high hopes and dreams in our young years, and what do we get as we age? We get to watch our dreams die. One after another. It really really hurts. And at some point you just think, "what is this all for? Is this all there is to life? Kids, a car, a wife, a bland and safe life, a boring job, and a mortgage?" and then you think forward and imagine yourself dying of old age, having accomplished nothing of significance. Then you'll realize that only a few years after you die, nobody will even remember you existed. Only your kids will remember, with memories that will get weaker. Eventually they'll die too and every trace of you will be gone from the universe. That's what midlife crisis is all about, and it's frigging serious. What you do about it is up to you, but I guarantee you, if you don't do something, you'll end up in the depth of depression.

    69. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say is true, but being tormented by boredom at your job requires compensation. If it's shunned because it's boring and the industry is struggling to find employees, it's probably because the pay is crap. Increase the pay and you'll easily find people who will happily waste their day being bored.

      Additionally, I would argue it's not the "geeky" part that makes it boring, but the fact that the job is often repetitive and unthankful where it's quite common to sit in a cube or room by yourself for hours on end. Also, in my experience, "IT job" is often synonymous with "IT equipment mover", so not only do you have a crappy job, but you have a crappy job that's one step above riding around in a moving van.

    70. Re:Most jobs are boring by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > The problem is, when they hit a midlife crisis, rather than do something MEANINGFUL, like bug out of the rat race

      How do you know what is meaningful to you? You probably have spent your entire life without thinking about it. Just went from college to your job, and worked there ever since. How do you know what you need to do? Maybe a trophy girl really is what you need. Maybe you really do want to race cars, or just get drunk and do nothing all day. Until you try, it is sometimes hard to tell. So don't go too hard on those who make mistakes.

      > Me? I turned 40 and flipped out, but instead of the bleeth and the car, I talked with my
      > wife, went back to school and got into academia.

      Oh yeah. I tried that. But academia is not the place to be if you aren't willing to play politics and subscribe to their extreme left views. I lasted all of one year before remembering all the little things I hated about being in college. Needless to say, it's not for everyone.

    71. Re:Most jobs are boring by prickeke · · Score: 1

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      I disagree. Perhaps that's because I've read too many books like "48 days to the work you love" but I disagree. I think that people should find work that they love, by first changing your attitude about work. In this age, you can find something you love and a million other people that love that and make money doing it. Some people love to make CAT5 cables, test them and patch routers. Some people probably love configuring routers and see their work result in people being able to have access and be productive (or read Slashdot) at work. It's the attitude that counts -- do the work you love and believe that you will be successful at it and you will.
    72. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to Europe and buy one of the Smart Coupe's :) Or a Lotus Elise/Exige :D

    73. Re:Most jobs are boring by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Selfish people might feel that way. My kids are total pain in the ass, but I wouldn't trade them for anything (not even a set of mag wheels), because being a father is also the most satisfying job I've ever had. My kids might drive me crazy, but as soon as they're all gone, I miss 'em terribly. Before I had a family, I never laughed so much, or been a real hero to someone or felt really needed and consistently made a positive difference. (Of course, I've also never had someone puke on my head either.)

      At a job, you can have a project be cancelled and a year of work is just thrown out, but that can never happen with children, because the work itself is also the meaning, and its effects are immediate as well as long-term. Of course doing good coding is also meaningful regardless of what it's used for, but it's never the same thing. I've had plenty of good jobs, and the one I have now is about the best I've had in 21 years, but the best day at work doesn't match having kids (although a good day at work is a nice break from kids :-).

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    74. Re:Most jobs are boring by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Even if you're an artist in a field you love, a good portion of your time is going to be spent doing something you don't enjoy. Arranging showings at galleries and talking to people where 3/4 don't understand/appreciate your work. 16 to 18 hour days from sitting in makeup/learning your lines. Going on tour for a year while your girlfriend/wife/kids are mostly at home.

      Every job has aspects that won't interest you and you can't always subcontract them to someone else (or else you can't do it without taking a big risk on getting massively ripped off). That's reality. Find something where you can do enough of what you love to get you through the parts that you don't love.

      It's sort of like a long-lasting marriage. There's going to be something about your partner that bugs you, but the relationship will last if there's enough good parts that draw you together to outweigh the things that pull you apart.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    75. Re:Most jobs are boring by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      Dude, haven't you heard? Chicks dig base jumpers!

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
    76. Re:Most jobs are boring by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Wait eight years. Add a mortgage and a couple of kids. ...or you could just remain a bachelor, start your own business, and spend your entire life doing whatever you feel like. I run my own business in the automotive aftermarket. I live in a warehouse. The main office is my living room, the side office is my bedroom, and the 3000 sq. ft. warehouse area is my playground, filled with hot rods, motors, car parts, projects, etc. I wake up whenever I please, put in a few hours of work whenever needed and convenient, then spend the rest of the time doing whatever sounds fun. I'm 24 years old. In today's world of divorces, unhappy marriages, and bitches attempting to control men's lives, why should I ever want to get married and have a bunch of liabilities (i.e. kids?)

    77. Re:Most jobs are boring by mattkime · · Score: 1

      i don't know what bleeth are but its not defined on urbandictionary.com - this is your chance!

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    78. Re:Most jobs are boring by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      I spent a lot of years in acedemia before becoming a cog in the corporate machine and don't recall anything about having to subscribe to extreme left views. Then again, I was in hard science. YMMV

    79. Re:Most jobs are boring by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      >If your biological imperatives told you to jump off a bridge in order to impress potential mates, would you do it?

      If your lack of bioligal imperitaves told you to take on a life of celibacy and get castrated, would you do it? There are such people here in India. They are called Hijras and they are regarded as deviants.

    80. Re:Most jobs are boring by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      At a job, you can have a project be cancelled and a year of work is just thrown out, but that can never happen with children, because the work itself is also the meaning, and its effects are immediate as well as long-term.

      I would fully recover eventually if my project was killed. The analog is too horrible to fully consider.

      --
      i forget
    81. Re:Most jobs are boring by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

      removing Windows viruses is boring
      hearing from customers the server has gone off line again is boring
      fixing windows driver problems is boring
      reinstalling windows is boring
      teaching people how not to use windows is boring
      seeing the same users having the same problems is boring
      I can't find the file is boring
      it crashed and I can't find half a days work is boring
      getting out in the sunshine is great
      going surfing is great

      --
      Go well
    82. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We face the grind anyway, day after day, because it keeps the ball rolling, and because it gives us the money we need to do the things we actually like doing.

      For the rest of us, the money goes to basic overhead: food, shelter, gas, house and equipment maintenance, health-care -- as does the so-called "free time".
    83. Re:Most jobs are boring by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      But sometimes I wonder about the sports car..

      I'm 31. I bought mine when I was 23. Don't wonder, while very fun, you get used to it in day to day use. Used to the point that if you get a less powerful car (let's say you rent one on vacation), that you think it's a complete mule even though the very specs contradict that fact.

      I still have mine after 8 years and I will have a hard time to part with it when I must (I'm married and we want children). Also, be glad you don't have one with current gas prices ;-)

    84. Re:Most jobs are boring by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      Wow, what a retarded statement, I hope people didn't mod you up because of this. Of course you need to pay people to do jobs, no matter how exciting. If I've gotta choose between the most awesome job in the world (which would be mmmmh.. a secret cowboy agent who goes to space and gets to shoot ninjas) and flipping burgers for a minimum wage then I'll take the fast food job. Cause if I don't find at least $300 every week I'm screwed.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    85. Re:Most jobs are boring by stevie.f · · Score: 1

      A farming job may be less varied, but I would argue that it was more rewarding than many of the boring jobs today. It is so easy to spend a lifetime working and not see anything real produced or even get to interact with many people. System maintenance - if I do my job well then no one knows I exist and I see nothing tangible for my efforts. A lot of people probably feel the same way. I would love to be able to step back at the end of the day and actually be able to see what I've done

    86. Re:Most jobs are boring by tommut · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks. Now I'm depressed. :(

    87. Re:Most jobs are boring by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      BTW, even a boring job today is a lot more varied than the farming jobs most people had two centuries ago. We're just spoiled.
      Plus you only have to work about 7-8 hours a day, 5 days a week, rather than 10-12 hours a day 7 days a week, and you get 4 or 5 weeks holiday a year. Also, if you're sick your family doesn't starve to death.

      I'm not sure the above applies in America, though.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    88. Re:Most jobs are boring by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

      -Skydiving Instructor?
      -Porn Star?
      -Race Car Driver?
      -Astronaut?
      -Skydiving Porn Star Astronaut... in a RACE CAR?

    89. Re:Most jobs are boring by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
      Points are well taken - what flips my crank may not flip someone elses.

      Thanks for the suggestion of acquiring a trophy girl, but that's not my style.

      ;-)

      The lefty politics I don't mind, being a bit of a socialist myself. But I'm glad you're happy where-ever you are. Your idea of living on the Appalachian trail is a good one, I just suck at camping...

      best,

      RS

      --
      Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    90. Re:Most jobs are boring by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      AMEN, where the hell are my mod points.

      People take things for granted, children shouldn't be one of those things we as a society take for granted. The very same people bitching about "crotch-fruit" will be the ones complaining about lack of quality people in 20 years. Children are children, but let's not forget they will be adults, they have value and need guidance.

    91. Re:Most jobs are boring by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      There is more to life then being remembered as a person. The knowledge that you did a good job and raised some children who will also make the world a better place. I try to live my life as an example. People may not remember me by name, but I've touched alot of lives and the things I've done will continue to touch many more lives. In acts of kindness and education you will find meaning more meaning then useless entries in history books.

    92. Re:Most jobs are boring by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I see posts like this all the time and I can't help but think how sad it is that you will never know the joy I know. There is so much joy in the simple things with children. I've been watching Star Wars with my girls and it is so awesome to see the looks on their faces for little things that were old hat to me. They were so shocked when the bounty hunter who rescued Han Solo turned out to be Princess Leia, they were discussing it and had decided it must be Luke Skywalker.

      Kids find joy in everything, more adults should. It's definitely hard work, but of your choices are no kids, kids and don't put in the hard work (they turn out pretty bad), or kids and put in the hard work (a great final product). I'll take #3 any day.

    93. Re:Most jobs are boring by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Kids are the epitome of "you get what you pay for", put in the time and effort and you get something amazing. If you don't, you end up with the irritating shit's that nobody wants around and keep our prisons full.

    94. Re:Most jobs are boring by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Oddly... all I've ever dreamed of when I was little was having some sort of stable job and a family with a comfortable life... I'm 30 and I'm not really any closer to having my dreams come true than anyone who wanted to be an astronaut, but has motion sickness.

      I'll take your kids, car, wife, job, mortgage, and life if you'll trade it for my stupidly insecure life with no safety nets...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    95. Re:Most jobs are boring by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I didn't want to walk down that path, but you've got a point.

      Nevertheless, a year with my children will always be more valuable to me that a year working on a project, even if both were to simply disappear. I might have learned something or have the satisfaction of having coded something really cool or clever, but in the big picture it doesn't amount to all the teaching, learning, sharing, laughter, joy (and pain) that parenthood brings.

      My kids are great if for no other reason (though there are many) than the fact that they have picked up my wicked sense of humor and constantly amuse me.

      e.g., A recent quip by my 12-year-old, "Always point your weapon in a safe direction, like at a hippie or politician."

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    96. Re:Most jobs are boring by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding! You've hit the nail on the head.

      Any investment into my kids, sometimes fun, often tedious, occasionally heart-wrenching has always returned to me tenfold.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    97. Re:Most jobs are boring by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Also, unless you're burned out, you might try something like Rent a Coder [rentacoder.com] and freelance, just to use those programming muscles again. I have used it couple of times to relieve stress. It's fun to compete with "Solid ASP/PHP/MYSQL/C#/LISP professional team from bangalore". I make a reasonable calculation that to full fill the posted requirements even in lax fashion would mean $3500 billing. These motherfuckers post their prepackaged web-development ads with $120 price tag into a C++ project and get the project. Unless I am feeling sufficiently spiteful and post with a real project plan with a $100 tag.
      In these cases I have worked diligently and followed through. With one project I worked about 150 hours just for fun. I have worked diligently and followed ridiculous instructions from clueless "managers" who think I actually give a shit about their $100 (buahaha, this stupid Finnish native will code me thousands of lines of code to get a shiny $100 for buying a reindeer to impress the father of his loved one...). Just to prove myself I can still do it. But in the end I figured its a waste of my time and sooner or later I get into some project which I let slide and end up putting someone else in bad position. I'll leave that part to the undercutters.

      I have found out that most of the time the buyers have no clue about what they want. Not even after I work hours to make requirement study with obvious elephant sized holes for them to fill out. Or they are oddly vague for whatever secret reasons: someone is going to steal their awesome idea, they are trying to reimplement someone elses system, stolen data to parse, etc. Which makes the implementation impossible.

      I have actualy used this service succesfully as a buyer thou. If you know what you want, you can weed out the crap and select the reasonable bid with competent coder. It's quite hard to find competent buyers thou.

      Oh yeah. I still get constant "invitation to bid on a project" mails. I guess it's possible to get projects there if you are willing to work for peanuts first to build a reputation.

    98. Re:Most jobs are boring by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      You're conflating two distinct things, finding life wanting, and worrying about your legacy. I've heard the "is this all there is to life" meme as being associated with a mid-life crisis. But the Bill Clinton thing is going to be exclusive to only the pathologically self-important. So I don't think that's a factor for everyone, and I don't think it being all about or mostly about one's job is a common factor either.

      And I hope it's not the common experience to watch one's dreams slowly die. I've been steadily ticking mine off over the years. Start immediately. Work hard. Discard unrealistic dreams, or work unrealistically hard. For example, if you want your name in the history books, you've got to work a lot harder than I do. The job's not the problem, it's just a means to an end, to fulfilling that subset of your life-long dreams that require money. The problem's when you have nothing to look forward to when you come home from your job. That's how my dad's mid-life crisis manifested. He had the bland, safe life. But he didn't rebel. He stuck it out and retired early. And I wanna be just like him.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    99. Re:Most jobs are boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats becuase you BELIEVE in a world like that!

      Someone should do something they like and that they love.

      You see the world from what society has defined it, and the younger generation
      (my) are responsible for changing the world and I guareentee you it WILL change..

    100. Re:Most jobs are boring by cduffy · · Score: 1

      The very same people bitching about "crotch-fruit" will be the ones complaining about lack of quality people in 20 years.

      Yes, but it'll be Someone Else's Problem because we refused to contribute to it! :)

      Seriously, though -- I'd be a bad parent. I've lived with people with kids (very good parents, thankfully, and more than able to compensate for my influence), and did the indulgent-uncle thing, overlooking when they were misbehaving (inclusive of cases when that clearly wasn't the right thing to do) and responding to their requests when such wasn't warranted. I don't have the discipline or the temperament to be a good parent -- and between my wife and I, we've got a significant set of genetics best not passed along. Finally, much of my life outside work is disorderly as it is. If I can't manage a household without children, how could I reasonably believe that a household with children would be any more tractable?

      I interact closely on a regular basis with adults whose lives are significantly dysfunctional in a manner directly traceable to poor parenting [though admittedly more severe than the combination of overindulgence and neglect I'd expect from myself], so the long-term effects of such are extremely visible; we'll stick to our professions and leave the child-rearing to folks better qualified, thankyouverymuch... and I'd appreciate it if you acknowledged the legitimacy of our choice.

      Those of us who bitch about "crotch-fruit" aren't all trying to ditch our responsibility to be part of the solution; some of us are fully aware that however good our intentions may be, we likely would end up a part of the problem.

    101. Re:Most jobs are boring by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you have well-reasoned and thought out response. I like it, I would however say that if you do use the term "crotch-fruit" it does not appear to fit with the apparent value you place on children.

      My response was more to the people who seem to place no value on children and think the world would be a better place without them. I understand some people can not, or should not have children. I just find it distasteful when people admonish me for my choice to have children.

    102. Re:Most jobs are boring by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Dear parent,

      Please feel free to have kids, enjoy all the things you say they bring into your lives, and not take a discount on your taxes every year for having them.

      Another concerned taxpayer.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  37. This is good news. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

    This means I get to be a bit picky when I need a job.

  38. The Places with lots of PHBs and TPS report driven by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The Places with lots of PHB's and TPS report driven office are boring. Even more so when you spend more time of paper work then real work.

  39. IT just can't compare to..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    the exciting fast paced life of working the drive through at the local burger barn for minimum wage.

  40. I did! by everphilski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 1999, I was debating what to do for my college career, aerospace engineering or IT. I had two jobs in high school, one working for a mom and pop ISP, the other working for a software company as a "junior network administrator", and was programming in c++ for fun, so I knew what IT was about. I also had an extreme love for space.

    I figured, push comes to shove, IT was something I could pick up without a 4 year degree, if I needed something to fall back on, but aerospace engineering you really needed that piece of paper (and then a masters, and probably a PhD if you want to do the cool stuff). Plus, as an engineer, a lot of times you get to write or maintain code if you are in the design world, so you can incorporate elements of IT into your job as needed.

    I have never experienced an ounce of regret.

    1. Re:I did! by Bandman · · Score: 1

      So did you become an aerospace engineer?

    2. Re:I did! by jgijanto · · Score: 1

      So did you become an aerospace engineer?

      He Did!
    3. Re:I did! by Bandman · · Score: 1

      D'oh. :-) Missed the title. Thanks

    4. Re:I did! by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, got the degree in '05, masters in '07, should have the PhD within a year. Been working in industry for three years now. I write/maintain code in FORTRAN/C++ and do CFD analysis.

    5. Re:I did! by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Yay! Another AE on the site. Which center do you work for? Which school? Granted the school could give away the center. I know Langley does some CFD (based on some presentations at GSRP) but I assume pretty much every center does - JPL and Glenn use it I'm sure.

      I was in a similar boat; I liked software and learned C++ in high school but wasn't sure if I wanted to make a career out of just software. Funny enough I came into school wanting to work on next-gen space craft (Constellation and on) but ended up getting a undergrad research position that did aeronautic technology work with Langley (UEET, VSP) and got interested in commercial aircraft.

      I'm hat tricking my degrees at Georgia Tech - BS 06, MS 07, PhD hopefully by 10 (quals this Fall). I currently work on aircraft performance for an FAA contract using the NASA code FLOPS. Ended up learning FORTRAN out of it and I've talked with the guy that wrote it.

  41. Expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all about expectations held by new grads.

    New grads expect to be given the lead developer role, the keys to the server room, and a license to print money.

    Guess what? It doesn't work that way.

    You will start by being the windows reinstaller, cable puller , desktop lugger, etc.

    Pull your weight, and then you graduate to 2nd level helpdesk.

    Still pull your weight, good, now you can do some php development work for the web guys.

    You have a useless piece of paper, and most of you have little to no experience. Expect to start at the bottom of the ladder/food chain.

    1. Re:Expectations by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You will start by being the windows reinstaller, cable puller , desktop lugger, etc. ...ah, no.

      If that's all that you can manage after getting out of school then you wasted your time.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Expectations by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yet, show me a non-entry-level-dev job in IT which a student can reasonably expect to get with helpdesk experience and a degree. Hint: there aren't any.

      And getting into entry-level-dev positions won't help you get into IT, either.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Expectations by joleran · · Score: 1
      > If that's all that you can manage after getting out of school then you wasted your time.

      People do get suckered into those 2 year "IT" degrees though. Perhaps that's what he's referring to.

      As for people with actual degrees and knowledge to back them up, a junior developer role is not far-fetched at all.

    4. Re:Expectations by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I had a junior C++ developer job while I was still in college.

      If you are going to a decent school, this is not a big thing. They will most probably have a program in place to help you with this.

      If your degree can't get you a real CIS job straight out of college then you either did something wrong while you were still going to school or your degree is worthless and you should have majored in something else. If your CIS degree is not going to get you a decent job then you might as well do something in college that will broaden your skills beyond what you will learn on the job.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  42. It;'s All Relative by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was once chatting with someone at a party. They asked me what I did. I said I wrote software. They then said "Isn't that boring?". I said "No, it's generally interesting, and even fun on occasion. What do you do".

    "I'm an accountant."

    1. Re:It;'s All Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of you are in boring jobs.

    2. Re:It;'s All Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done both and believe me it's mostly the same boring crap...

    3. Re:It;'s All Relative by verbamour · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do you tell an extroverted accountant?

      He looks at _your_ shoes when he's talking to you.

      (it's an oldie, but a goodie)

    4. Re:It;'s All Relative by shermo · · Score: 1

      How do IT people make their partys more interesting? Invite accountants

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    5. Re:It;'s All Relative by Falconhell · · Score: 0

      Q: What do accountants use for contraceptives. A: Their personailties

    6. Re:It;'s All Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe you. Slashdot readers don't get invited to parties.

    7. Re:It;'s All Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once chatting with someone at a party. They asked me what I did. I said I wrote software. They then said "Isn't that boring?". I said "No, it's generally interesting, and even fun on occasion. What do you do".

      "I'm an accountant."

      The bean-counter calling the nerd dull, if you will.
    8. Re:It;'s All Relative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once chatting with someone at a party. They asked me what I did. I said I wrote software. They then said "Isn't that boring?". I said "No, it's generally interesting, and even fun on occasion. What do you do".

      "I'm an accountant."

      The Arthur Andersen folks didn't do boring accounting. It was quite creative fiction.
  43. Is this an intentional but subtle ob-Python? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [If I had the power to do it all over again...] I would have gone into Economics.

    Or maybe Forestry...

    Sounds like you didn't want to be an IT drone. You wanted to be.... a lumberjack!

  44. bill gates reference by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. bill gates doesn't work in IT, he was the CEO of a huge company, which couldn't be less related to IT.

    2. bill gates is worth billions of dollars. There's nothing boring about having billions of dollars.

    3. IT jobs are boring but they beat the crap out of day labor, warehouse, etc. in about every way... so I would seriously consider how much work you think a job should be before you turn down an IT job.

    --
    stuff |
  45. I want to be a toaster when I grow up by DustoneGT · · Score: 0

    People working in IT are like appliances. You do what you are programmed to do and get no respect. I had several IT jobs and finally realized that I had to leave the field. The job sucked and everybody was an asshole when things broke.

  46. Are you seriously blaming Bill Gates for this? by Ecifer · · Score: 1

    I mean really? The man is the poster child for why you SHOULD get into IT... I don't think anyone looks at Bill Gates, with his billions of dollars, happy family, and from an outsider's point of view "good life," and says "Nope... don't want to be a nerd like that!"

    People think it's boring because, generally speaking, it can get VERY monotonous. If you don't like programming (regardless of how you define the word), you won't like IT. If you don't like long hours trying to figure out why something isn't working on 1 out of 1000 machines, you probably won't like IT either. I'm not going to get into a "You might be a redneck if..." stream here, but I think you get my point.

    If the corporate world is honestly having problems finding IT people, they should either (A) Outsource to a reliable partner, or (B) offer more money. Long story short, IT is like any other job on the planet, if you offer people enough money, they'll gladly do it.

  47. Speak for yourself by Bandman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the kind of dull I can get behind.

    Having to support 10 different wonky platforms and trying to make a cohesive infrastructure from them?

    I'm glad those bad-old-days are over.

    1. Re:Speak for yourself by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Having to support 10 different wonky platforms and trying to make a cohesive infrastructure from them?

      I'm glad those bad-old-days are over.

      How about just getting those 10 wonky platforms to all speak LDAP to centralize your authentication. I really wouldn't mind having a dedicated OS to run my web or database server. If AS/400's weren't so boring and IBMish and I was a DB2 fan, I'd be an advocate of the iSeries as a datasource for any java/php/.net/ruby/perl shop with more than 2 gigs of data.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:Speak for yourself by Bandman · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Speak for yourself by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      So we are left supporting one big wonky platform with no real hope of it ever getting better. Sorry but Vista and wonky really do go together.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Speak for yourself by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      Dull unfortunately also means every company has to dedicate some % of the bottom line into a sunk cost called "IT" that they receive absolutely no boon from.

      I'm not saying IT is useless or that there doesnt need to be some budget allocation, but the amount we spend maintaining and fixing infrastructure that should-- by now-- just work, is insane. Worse, I've seen very little improvement looking back 10 years.

      This dull environment isnt good for business and its not good for IT. Obviously 10 different platforms by 10 different companies is not good or sustainable, but least common denominator stasis we've fallen towards isnt good for anyone either.

    5. Re:Speak for yourself by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      I dont have words to express how sorrowful it is that MS got integrated kerberos+ldap authentication+authorization before *nix world did. There really should be many distros with services that come out of box configured for kerberos+ldap. In casual conversation (elevator speeches) I used to call Linux a network OS, that it attempted to be a network citizen. The failure of Linux to converge on common network infrastructure is, to me, the most soul crushing failure I have witnessed from open source.

    6. Re:Speak for yourself by Bandman · · Score: 1

      The issue with IT "just working" is that it's chasing a moving target. If all IT was required to do was say, share files from a central server, that's taken care of. Done. With the exception of disk space limitations and hardware failures, that hurdle was passed 10 years ago.

      Every year, IT is expected to cross some new obstacle, though. Remote users VPN'd in (with their deskphones transparently moved to their cells, please), instantaneously provide the same information everywhere (whether the information is files, database, or authentication, it doesn't matter. it should be everywhere. now.).

      These problems will eventually get solved to the level of reliability and satisfaction that simple file serving will. But by that time, there will be new requirements, and we'll be fighting to meet those, too.

      It's a curve, and we're always behind it.

    7. Re:Speak for yourself by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      The failure of Linux to converge on common network infrastructure is, to me, the most soul crushing failure I have witnessed from open source.

      NIS works just fine, and ldap isn't that hard. One thing I love about windows is ACLs. Yet I never setup posix ACLs on a machine. I don't think there is a "just works" solution for a ldap server, but there are easy to follow howto's. Redhat allows you to setup ldap authentication against active directory at setup time.

      There is little need for centralized authentication in most enterprises. How many unix servers these days have user accounts for users that don't have root access. A few might have users with limited sudo rights, but few have shell accounts for anyone other than admin and support staff.

      The problem is more along the lines of there are so many choices for centralized authentication in unix that there is no obvious default.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    8. Re:Speak for yourself by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      | The problem is more along the lines of there are so many choices for centralized authentication in unix that there is no obvious default.

      I beg to differ. LDAP+Kerberos is the way to do it. There really arent any network alternatives.

      LDAP works fine, its setting up kerberos, samba, ftpd-of-choice, pam, your web server, vpn, dovecot, x509 certs, &c &c &c &C for ldap thats an enormous time consuming pain. LDAP itself gives you very little, its wiring up all the services that distros need to come along and provide for network users.

  48. IT folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You only have a problem with it because you're in the industry. You see, a bunch of us who really liked other things discovered that we needed to make a living, so we went into IT. You people here on /. love to make jokes about liberal arts majors saying "You want fries with that?" because that's all that they're qualified for. Well, I got news for you. A well paying career is going to attract folks who need something to pay the bills. Just ask Doctors and Lawyers. I would LOVE to be a full time artist but the field is so saturated that there are 3 qualified people for every job. No thank you! I knew a Doctor who is a classical pianist - a very good one. But he wanted a family and he knew that he couldn't have one on a musician's pay. What, you want him to go on welfare because he followed his passion?!?

    So you "they only got into it for the money" people should shut up.

    1. Re:IT folks by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with anyone as long as they know what they heck they're doing. However, too many of that "just for the money" crowd didn't pay attention in class. They don't keep up with the times. As they said in Office Space, they work just hard enough not to get fired.

      For example, I have one coworker who hates every new piece of technology that comes into this building. Several key apps that they control are running several MAJOR versions behind on patches. We have support that pays for all new versions. It's not financial. They're simply afraid of the patch screwing up their little magic box (that they barely understand how to work as it is). New technologies aren't embraced or researched. Instead, they look at every opportunity to explain why a new technology SHOULDN'T be implemented. I'm talking simple stuff like email accounts for all office users, or laptops for our users in the field. Any advance in anything (like moving from binary file formats to XML, moving from flat files to databases, moving from text screens to GUI's, etc) is viewed as a negative, because that means actually having to learn something new again.

      The simple truth is that these people don't like their job, and as with most people who dislike their job, they're not very good at it. I don't enjoy hiring or working with people who I don't consider competent, and an influx of people who hate what they're doing doesn't help that situation.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    2. Re:IT folks by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I knew a Doctor who Launch missiles. EXTERMINATE!
  49. Really? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    Mod article headline as "Obvious"

  50. Who cares? Let the market decide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boring or not, IT is the core of many a business now so it's not like it's going anywhere. If new grads look upon it as boring and choose to stay away from it, fine. Those already in the industry will have better job security and those willing to enter can expect better benefits and pay. Supply and demand, baby.

  51. So ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am curious, some people sound like the only entry level IT jobs available is support? I am too old to understand, my first programming job was not exactly easy to find, I spent a couple of months, 6 maybe. After that, I am on easy street.

    Maybe these new grads are in smaller city? I live in large city all my life, and have no idea how tough it could be in smaller city.

  52. At the risk of sounding bitter by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 1

    GOOD, get out of my vocation. Go flood the nursing schools or whatever is the flavor of the week profession at the moment. Now if we can get around to clearing up all these Paper Certifications floating around we can really get to business.

  53. Spair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they avoid IT because so many people like the submitter don't know how to spell "spare".

  54. Well, look at that... by Turiko · · Score: 1

    I think IT would be the perfect job for me. I'm very interersted in it, and next year, i'm going into network management, wich is more about computer hard- and software then just networks ;).

  55. Re: 2 words down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Either use all 7 of the words or leave george alone.

  56. A wise man once said..... by kipin · · Score: 1

    Spair today, gone tomorrow.

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
  57. fine by me! by lawaetf1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every now and then I get a twinge of "oh god, I'm really still working at the computer lab in college but with bigger machines and 10x the pay." Then I think about other jobs.

    Lawyer.. HELL NO. Unless you end up doing fancy litigation it has to be one of the worst jobs in the universe.

    Medical.. bleh. Boring? Is performing the same knee surgery over and over and over again not a bit rote? If you end up in primary care you at least get to help people 1-on-1. Help them take drugs to counter their lack of exercise, smoking, etc. Med school. ick. I think it's 40% of doctors say they wouldn't recommend the career to their children. That's one hell of an endorsement.

    MBA? Interesting idea, would probably shortcut a lot of time in getting into the upper echelons but I can't stand posturing, game playing, and management speak so would probably not do well there. I'm an engineer.. in a self-taught sort of way. I look down my nose at MBAs.

    Oh yes... wicked hours and professional attire for all of the above.

    About the only thing I think would tempt me would be some form of design/electrical engineering. So I've picked up a couple books on the same and will start tinkering that direction. If need be, I'll go to grad school.

    For the moment, however, I'm wearing shorts and flipflops, am decently paid, left alone, showed up at work at 10, and have a little web stack I can call my own. I have, admittedly, a bunch of mind-numbing, syntactically sensitive technical problems to work on but with each passing week I add a lump of knowledge and maybe a tool or two to solve future problems.

    If everyone wants to stay away.. fine by me! I'll just be in demand all the more.

    Y'know, I think I've written myself into a better mood.

    --
    CommentBot 0.7a running with args "-module irritate,disagree -target random"
    1. Re:fine by me! by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

      A MBA is a ticket punch into management. You don't need one, but it does set you apart, showing that you can set down a long term goal and complete it. It should give you better writing, negotiating, and analytical skills. With COBIT becomming bigger with our industry, these skill sets will help in the long run. Of course, you could be the 60 year old programmer working a government job talking about the good old days of fortran.

      --

      In God we trust, all others require data.

    2. Re:fine by me! by oppera · · Score: 1

      On the medical field: Have you ever been behind the scene in a Shock Trauma ward or in the Pediatric ICU when a baby/child codes? Rote my shiny metal a**. Okay, other professions aren't as interesting to you-I get it. But don't poo-poo the field. These folks save lives which is more important than computers and programing any day. Have a little respect for the people (the decent ones anyway) who may save your life one day or life of someone you love.

    3. Re:fine by me! by ruggerboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a litigator who is leaving law after 5 years to teach high school math, I 100% agree. Litigation sucks unless you have a ruthless edge (not necessarily a bad thing) and get off on squashing others (again, not always a bad thing). Even when the underlying facts of a matter are interesting and I get to go to court, 99.99999% of the work is horribly boring. Email made that infinitely worse for young lawyers (think hundreds of thousands of pages of e-discovery for even relatively minor matters). Lucky for me I'm about to go bore a bunch of teenagers, instead of being bored myself with a bunch of document review!

  58. Most IT jobs are boring for a good CompSci/Eng by sirwired · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While there are few jobs within IT where your college education really feels useful (i.e. architecture jobs), for most of them, a college grad is either grossly overqualified because he/she paid attention in all those theoretical classes which have no bearing on corporate IT and is a geek that could have done most of the jobs without college, or grossly underqualified, because he/she took a CompSci/Eng program just for the money, and failed to pick up the necessary practical skills outside of class during their education.

    I would go so far to say that if you want to work corporate IT, a 2yr program should be sufficient. If you want to work in the technology industry itself, creating or supporting lower level stuff than end-user apps, then a college education comes in handy. For those jobs, a formal education is real useful, and employers in the computer industry expect you to pick up most of your skills via OJT, so previous practical knowledge is actually less useful than with IT employers.

    For me, my first job out of college with a freshly minted CompE degree was top-level support for a company making network routing equipment. Never mind I had never actually seen a router before in my life... It wasn't a problem, since the work was so low-level that pretty much nobody was expected to come into the job having the required protocol analysis skills. Having a well-rounded CompE education came in real handy for picking up that stuff in a hurry.

    Most of the development work in Corporate IT is churning out one DB App after another. Most of the other work is sysadmin, DB admin or user support work. I just don't see the relevance of the broad theoretical knowledge provided by a college education there.

    I can't imagine doing my job for a tech company well without my CompE degree, and I can't imagine what I would do with my degree at most of the customers I deal with.

    SirWired

    1. Re:Most IT jobs are boring for a good CompSci/Eng by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are spot on.

      A 2yr degree is all you need for IT. I just finished my CS degree and out of all the classes I had I think a total of about 5 wanted to do something other than IT. As a result most of the students didnt pay attention and learn what they should have. They simply didnt get the benefits of a 4 year degree.

      But really, they dont need to know that stuff anyway. What is a run of the mill IT guy going to do with DeMorgans Laws? What are they going to do with Z Transforms? JK Flip Flops? Multiplexors?

      People who *know* they want to go into IT should not major in CS. It is a waste of their time and everyone else's. Im not trying to slam IT or anything (if it wasnt for them I couldnt even post this response!).

      In short, I am happy this trend is becoming more apparent. I felt like a lot of my curriculum was watered down because so many students wanted to do IT and didnt want to do CS. Hopefully this trend increases and IT gets its own major or just is phased out of 4 year institutions. I think it would be better for everyone.

    2. Re:Most IT jobs are boring for a good CompSci/Eng by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the others, but in sysadmin work, the broad theoretical base can be very useful, and -does- set someone who paid attention in school apart from the person who didn't, even if they are otherwise on similar footing.

      At the very least, the theoretical knowledge gives a person a critical edge up when it comes time to hunting down a problem or spec'ing out new system hardware. While you could just throw $20k of hardware at a problem in some instances, you might only need $4k (and you can prove this through a breakdown of the variables). Or you might be able to figure out which driver is causing a problem, and why - when it's been a plague of a problem for everyone who has tried it before you. And so on and so forth...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  59. Well, perhaps it would be less boring... by seanonymous · · Score: 1

    Perhaps IT would be less boring if every office had a Beowolf cluster or two.

    Unless it was a Beowolf cluster of boring machines...

  60. The flip side is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...IT professionals find new grads boring, too.

    In all seriousness, if your notion of IT is patching network cables or parsing log files or working for the Geek Squad, then yeah, it probably IS boring. But at a certain level (such as systems architecture and software development - to name two), information technology work can be as challenging, as fascinating and as richly rewarding as any other career. Like a lot of professions, IT is what you make of it.

  61. I, for one, welcome our new whiny bratty overlords by HiVizDiver · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the age of entitlement. :-/

  62. IT != The Web by mckinnsb · · Score: 1

    Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spair time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?"


    I think the person who summarized this article is confusing the popularly (poorly) used generalization of the word "IT" with the industry definition.

    Spelling mistakes aside, IT really has little to do with 'web first' outside of providing the beast for web applications to run on. If you really want to think 'web first', you would probably get yourself into web application development, which tends to be more creatively oriented than IT , although I won't eschew the fact that some IT engineering feats require a great deal of creativity. In my mind, computer science grads who entered the field because of a "web first" mentality are more likely to enter that field than IT.

    I wonder what the statistics are for people graduating with web application specializations? May be a little too early to have that kind of data at hand...

  63. Kudos by mpapet · · Score: 1

    I needed a laugh. Thanks.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  64. Think about what we _could_ be doing by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy?

    No, it's because Bill Gates slowed innovation in the industry to a crawl. Well, he and all those people who broke end-to-end model of the Internet using NAT, dynamic IP addressing, deep packet inspection, "no servers" policies, proprietary data interchange formats, etc. And don't even get me started on digital video and cryptography patents.

    "IT" has come to mean "IT inside the company you work for". We have all these wonderfully powerful information processing technologies at the edges of the Internet, but can we make new and exciting uses of them? Not many. Why? Because of the problems I mentioned in the previous paragraph.

    So yeah, it's a boring job.

    1. Re:Think about what we _could_ be doing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's because Bill Gates slowed innovation in the industry to a crawl. Well, he and all those people who broke end-to-end model of the Internet using NAT, dynamic IP addressing, deep packet inspection, "no servers" policies, proprietary data interchange formats, etc. And don't even get me started on digital video and cryptography patents. yawn.. another fan boy.. go away.

      If it wasn't for gates we would have 1 million different kinds of operating systems, and the average consumer wouldn't even care about computers. which means less average computer users, less advertisement dollars, which means no e-commerce, which means.. yada yada.. and no job for all the ungrateful pricks like you.

      Seriously, you're opinion is worthless, nobody gives a shit about what you think. Sure, mine isn't worth much either, but at least I know that.

    2. Re:Think about what we _could_ be doing by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to in your post, as you're obviously working from some degree of localized knowledge, but I thought I'd comment on this:

      No, it's because Bill Gates slowed innovation in the industry to a crawl.

      What you (and I) call innovation, the majority of the populace calls "irritating upgrades and disruptions". I agree that MS most certainly did destroy much of the industry - like a beautiful, yet deadly lichen which kills trees, with the ultimate result being a pile of rotting wood.

      No, what MS did was make "IT" accessible to a broader audience at a substantially lower cost than anyone else, and gave the appearance of functionality. A lot of the practices were deceptive, and in the process actual innovation was destroyed, with the end result being a more standardized (albeit, a completely closed standard). But that's what companies and home users wanted (at the time).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Think about what we _could_ be doing by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      And you're not a fan boy?

      We might have had many operating systems, but would the average consumer care less about computers? Would people be indifferent to the Amigas and Ataris?

  65. Keep Salaries up by wardk · · Score: 1

    way to go kids. keep demand up!

    I'll take fries with that burger....

  66. They may be right by geekoid · · Score: 1

    IT is boring.
    Sure, you're busy but after a few years the intellectually challenge goes away.

    IT is a suckers game. Don't play.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  67. Yay Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case no one has realized this yet:

    More demand with less supply just means that our salaries go up!

  68. Revision control by DeadDecoy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Those so called slackers weren't copying, they were actually developing a form of distributed revision control! Think about it. The more people you let copy your work, the more likely you can get back an exact duplicate or even an older revision, in the case that your copy becomes corrupt. :)
    Ah, sorry, I'm a little off topic.

  69. IT work is SAFE by Bengie · · Score: 1

    I guess my eyes hurt if i don't take my recommend break from my LCD every 3-4 hours but atleast I don't have a slipped disk/broken bones/nail through the head/etc that you may get at any other jobs. I know someone who likes their simplistic job at the local paper mill, but their hand recently went splat when a multi-ton item pinned their hand against the wall.

    I also prefer the behind-the-scenes IT position. I get all the fun of trouble shooting without all the 'fun' of working directly with the average person. I get to transfer/transform database data/scema from a Student Information System (SIS) into our local storage and custom tables for each customer. This results in me figuring out each SIS and fixing the problems that the customer may add into the mix.

    It is repetative, but somehow always new.

  70. plumbing by lophophore · · Score: 1

    I have been working as a software developer for 27 years.

    I wish I had taken my 6-year-old self's career advice and become a plumber.

    I'd be retiring this year.

    Instead, I get to look forward to 20 more years of "boring" software development.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:plumbing by russotto · · Score: 1

      The downside of plumbing is that when you're hip-deep in shit, you're _really_ hip-deep in shit.

  71. Not surprising by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    "IT" is to Computer Science as lube technition is to Mechanical Engineering. Someone with the cert to mind Cisco routers or diagnose your breaks isn't going to have the skills, probably, to build design a router or a hydraulic system -- and for those who DO have that education, doing that sort of day-to-day maintenance is a boring waste of time.

    its the same in any field. A highly skilled artist isn't going to find designing a display of beans at the grocery store particularly stimulating.

  72. That's Awsome!!! by roster238 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with those who have said "Oh well, more work for me". The fewer folks who are interested = better long term job and salary prospects for us. You must admit that only about 20% of the folks you deal with in IT actually know what their doing anyway. They spend much of their days directing the 70% who don't really understand what they are doing but know how to follow instructions and then they spend the rest of their time cleaning up after the 10% who are complete morons.

    --
    I swear I didn't know it was loaded...
  73. Gates made it boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates made IT tedious and boring, but this job description has nothing to do with culture/image. The reason I use Linux is because it permits me to constantly evolve and shape my environment and network, to make progress and generative change. If I had to keep fixing a broken environment I could never improve, I would go mad. If I'm in IT, I demand to be in a knowledge worker role where I can shape the systems I work in.

  74. slashdot is way too insular by Jaeph · · Score: 1

    Reading the story preview and responses shows how insular slashdot is:

    1) Bill Gates is responsible for making the field nerdy? What, the rest of us are smooth-talking jocks, and that Gates guy is dragging the average down? Get serious, please.

    2) Most people do not like to work on logic problems all day. It's boring to them. You can spin this however you like, but in the end dealing with computers is cold and dry - no people skills, no art, no expression. It's all 1s and 0s. The exceptional areas (e.g. web page designer) are the ones where we see too many people, as it seems to make IT more exciting.

    3) Like many other posters have said or alluded to: jobs are boring. There aren't enough fun jobs to go around, and even the fun ones have very large boring sides to them. Do you know how the basketball greats stay great? Hundreds of shots a day. Hundreds. From all parts of the court. That's sports - you can pull examples from whatever job you want, they all get boring.

    finally, like many posters have said - fine by me. I get a rich field to pick from.

    -Jeff

    --
    Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
  75. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If IT jobs were boring, we'd spend all our time reading ./.

  76. black boxes are pretty dull on the outside. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the perspective on IT is distorted. alot of graduates have probably never had hands on experience with IT. the place where the action happens can often be pretty shrouded, and alot of the transparency some may see with other fields of technology isnt there. i dont remember a NOC tour being offered at my alma mater.

    if all you see is the guy in the closet racking a switch, or the IT person in the library fixing windows, it probably cant help but insist "this is not a career."

  77. Re:I, for one, welcome our new whiny bratty overlo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGREED! Apparently, concepts such as hunger and homelessness haven't hit home with our new spoiled overlords...

  78. GOOD! by labmonkey09 · · Score: 1

    Who needs the competition? Not me, not India.

    --
    /LabMonkey09
  79. Each Job different by kcdoodle · · Score: 1

    As a programmer, I have:

    1. Worked with Artificial Intelligence.
    2. Done internet backbone programming.
    3. Been an anti-terrorist (gov project)
    4. Been a crime fighter (AFIS-FBI)
    5. Monitored and Operated Gas Turbine and Steam turbine electric plants.
    6. Created tons of web apps for the State of Florida (Y2K)
    7. Worked on the National Science Foundation's - National Science Digital Library
    8. Worked in the Banking/Retirement/Stock Trading industry
    9. Presently work automating the work of "people on the floor" in a large company's billing department.

    I know, some of these sound great, and some were great. But, not all of the jobs that sound great were, and not all of the jobs that sound like crap are. I an interview, remember, you are interviewing THEM. If you do not like what you see, save the interviewer some time, ask for your resume back, and politely leave. I have.

    And if you do accept a job that tuns out to be crap, immediately start looking for a new job. As you can probably tell, I have done so on numerous occasions!

    --

    - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
  80. it's not compensation, it's booty by mkcmkc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CEOs don't get paid a fortune because that's what's needed to convince them to do an arduous job. They get paid a fortune because they're in a position to directly control how much they get paid, and they like being paid a lot. Think "pirate", not "drudge".

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    1. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Arccot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CEOs don't get paid a fortune because that's what's needed to convince them to do an arduous job. They get paid a fortune because they're in a position to directly control how much they get paid, and they like being paid a lot. Think "pirate", not "drudge". Awww... that's not fair. You get paid more with more responsibility, not just more work. CEOs have massive influence over a company. For all the craptastic CEOs in the news and such, there are dozens of solid CEOs managing their companies to larger and larger profits.

      If giving CEOs a bigger cut of the profits produces incentive for the CEO to increase earnings, it's just good business to give them a bigger cut.
    2. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite frankly I'm sick of IT and would not recommend they get into it. I can only take seeing clueless managers get better compensated than programmers who actually built the programs that enable managers to get good bonuses... also I'm seeing the programmers get dumber as salary is driven down. I hate business people, but if someone wants to make money than that is the side to be on.. .not the worker bee side.

    3. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Kent+Recal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you're missing relation and context here.

      It's not uncommon for a CEO to earn 10x or even 100x the salary of an average employee.
      The reason is not that he's adding 10x or 100x more value, the reason is because he can.
      He's worked himself up (or got born into) the top of the food chain and that's his privilege: he can fire you, you can't fire him.
      He can demand ridiculous salaries, you can not. He can sink your company but still get the golden parachute, you can't.

      This is the common pattern, admittedly quite a bit simplified.
      Nonetheless my point is: no single person can add >1000% value above average to a company constantly.
      As far as I am concerned: Pay them big bonuses when they strike a hot deal.
      But seven digit "salaries" are a [known] bug in our system.

    4. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. You keep believing that. CEOs and their golf buddies all look out for each other. They may not technically individually set their own pay, but they might as well.

    5. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Stew+Gots · · Score: 5, Insightful

      CEO's do not set their own compensation, the board of directors does.

      You clearly have no idea how things work in the real world. CEOs always try to pack the Board with their supporters, cut deals on the Board's compensation based on their own, recommend Directors for seats on other companies' boards, etc.

      Now carry on with your ignorant corporate cheerleading.

    6. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by j79zlr · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Look at Michael Ward, the CEO of CSX. He has done little else than provide a 320% return since he's become CEO in 2003 and there is a proxy fight to oust him and his board of directors? These guys have to handle incredible amounts of responsibility and pressure let alone the cut throat nature of the business.

      --
      I'm not not licking toads.
    7. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      That's a mighty "if" you've got there, friend...

    8. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's a common piece of propaganda as to why CEOs (and other executives) get paid so much (setting aside the obviously idiotic golden-parachutes-after-running-a-company-into-the-ground scenarios), but the executives are hardly doing all of the work themselves.

      Just as it is hard for the employees to be productive without having some kind of vision directing them, a visionary executive is pretty damn worthless unless he/she has people who can competently implement that vision.

      In many cases, the employees are taking MUCH more of a risk than any of the executives - when the company is doing badly, a lot of employees usually find themselves without jobs, and are left to figure out how they are going to take care of their families. There aren't too many executives that are going to find themselves living out of their cars even if they royally screw over a multi-million revenue company.

      The so-called risk & value that even well-respected CEOs provide to their company is often wildly overstated, and is more of a function of the "buddy-buddy" relationship they have with the people who set their compensation, rather than an objective look at the relative value they are providing to the company, and the personal risk they are taking.

    9. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CEO's do not set their own compensation, the board of directors does.

      At my company, the CEO is also the chairman of the board. Additionally, in publically traded companies (mine is not), tell me how many people serving on the board are not CEOs at some other company. I'll give you a hint, it's not that many (less than half or fewer). When you have CEOs and only CEOs voting on what to make the average CEO salary, you will have it inflated. It is no different than if the labor unions got to set employee pay with no restrictions from management at all. It would be set to the maximum it could be and not bankrupt the company. CEOs set it as high as they can and not get sued by shareholders or have the government take action. Pay levels are not set based on performance. If so, they would be more like the European pay differentials, and that's not the case.

    10. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      He's worked himself up (or got born into) the top of the food chain and that's his privilege: he can fire you, you can't fire him.
      He can demand ridiculous salaries, you can not. He can sink your company but still get the golden parachute, you can't.

      And who can fire the CEO of a public company? Who decides what their salary is, and what kind of "golden parachute" they get?

      The Board of Directors.

      And what is the most common other career for a member of the Board?

      CEO (or other executive position) for another public company.

      I mean, the CEO of my company is on the Board of Directors for two other companies, and hell he's even the Chairman of the Board for his own company. And this is utterly common.

      You think he, or any other Board member, is going to start a trend of reducing CEO's compensation? No, in fact the exact opposite! It's in their interest to drive up executive compensation, because then at their own company where they are CEO, they can ask to have their salaries raised "in accordance with industry norms" to sell it to the shareholders and employees. And of course the Board is going to say yes, thinking about their own CEO gigs.

      It's a racket. It's a huge incestuous web of people colluding for their own mutual benefit. The alleged "risk" of the position that is supposed to justify the compensation doesn't exist, because they've done everything they can to eliminate the risk. Forget even the ludicrous "golden parachute". What about the most simple of "risks" -- that if you screw up your job too badly, you won't be able to get a job in the same field again? Once again, that rarely happens, about the only way to 'ruin' your career in upper management is basically to get indicted. Otherwise, it's never in the interest of the Board to hold their CEOs to too high of standards, because they don't want they themselves to ever have to worry about finding a job.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by thedrx · · Score: 1

      This is true.

      There are many fair reasons to bash/hate corporations, seven digit salaries aren't one of them (IMO, of course, YMMV)

    12. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that their decisions influence whether the company sinks or soars. If job security depended on one person, you'd probably want that person to be well compensated. If there are a hundred of you, I think everybody'd put in a little bit extra to make sure that job security was there.

      And I haven't even gotten to the part about promotions or growth.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Stook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I'm not going to debate what constitutes a good CEO or a crappy one, I will add this thought to the discussion. A person is not born a natural CEO. There is a lot of hard work, successes and failures that go into becoming a good leader and someone who has the ability to lead or turn around a company. It's a completely different ball game when you decisions impact the entire future of a company than whether or not a button is working. Buttons can be fixed, a downward spiral is a hard thing to come out of.

      You're not just paying for their guidance now, but all of what it took them to get there and become the seasoned leader they are.

      That's not to say that there aren't the exceptions where people are given their positions, but for a good percentage, I would imagine this would apply.

    14. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take years and years of education and experience to be qualified to work on the bottom rung of the corporate ladder. To be a CEO, it does. As soon as you've attended a few years of post-graduate business school, accumulated a long track record of managerial success, demonstrated a solid understanding of the ins and outs of business and economics, and developed an incredibly long list of people who will vouch for you, you don't deserve as much as a CEO. It's not about how much work they do, or just how much value they bring, but how much leadership ability they have as well; and yes, if your CEO is buddy-buddy with the CEOs of other companies, that is an asset as well.

      If the board members didn't feel like the CEO was worth that much, they wouldn't pay him that much. And if the stockholders don't feel like the board members know what they're doing as far as CEO compensation is concerned, they'll elect new board members.

    15. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      You get paid more with more responsibility, not just more work.

      Yet how often do CEOs take responsibility when things go bad ? Very infrequently, unless you consider "golden parachute" and "responsibility" to be synonyms.

      The biggest "responsibility" a CEO has is deciding who to point the finger at.

      If giving CEOs a bigger cut of the profits produces incentive for the CEO to increase earnings, it's just good business to give them a bigger cut.

      What evidence is there that this holds true ? Hell, why does a CEO - someone utterly irrelevant to the day-to-day functioning of a company - even deserve to be considered so important ?

    16. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

      Actually even the greediest pirate captains generally didn't make more than 10 times the share of a deck hand. Comparing CEOs to pirates is very insulting to the honour of pirates.
      At least pirates were bound to profit sharing. Maybe if employees made more CEOs walk the plank out of their corner office windows then this practice would stop.

    17. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by jaykali · · Score: 1

      This sounds like the common argument of the worker bees vs management, who needs who more? I don't get CEO pay just bc it seems like the market would eventually normalize salaries but in the wacky world of wall street it doesn't seem to follow logic. I guess companies get all this capital raised and then pay a ransom to get some hot name to run the company and it perpetuates itself - I just can't imagine it will always be as redicilous as it is now. I wonder how much of the salary is actual cash and how much of it is stock options which is much easier to give away in that it's the currency of the company - just print shares and in the stock market world where share holders think they own something when they really only own .00000000001% of the company they don't have much say in that matter.

    18. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that their decisions influence whether the company sinks or soars.

      Theoretically. I haven't noticed this effect in practice. I'm fairly convinced that any semi-talented actor with the appropriate attributes (white, male, tall, executive hair and dress) could do just as well. It'd be interesting to study this scientifically...
      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    19. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by pxlmusic · · Score: 1

      agreed. "i always wonder why the french beheaded marie antionette, no i fucking GET it!" -- lewis black

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
    20. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by rathaven · · Score: 1

      A natural born CEO? I know there are people who are, quite naturally it would appear, singleminded, obsessive, competitive and lots of other things from the latest book of management buzzwords but I would always question whether CEO was a natural profession. You could liken it to tribal chieftain or some such, however, I'm not certain that CEOs would succeed at that in societies that do not match the current conditions.

    21. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by uncqual · · Score: 1

      A CEO easily has more than 10x or 100x the impact on the success of a large company as the "average" employee does. This is because the decisions a CEO routinely makes have much broader scope and include strategic decisions. The "average" employee in a large company may work their entire lives without ever making a useful strategic decision (and may never even make a strategic suggestion).

      A CEO who consistently makes mediocre decisions can easily destroy a company. An "average" employee who consistently makes mediocre decisions will have virtually no impact on the bottom line of a large public company (the salary and contributions of the "average" employee in such a situation is a rounding error).

      Consider if you have two qualified candidates, call them "A" and "B", for a job. "A" is 5% less competent than "B" but can be hired for 1/2 the price. Do you hire "A" or "B"? It turns out the answer depends on the job... If the job is for the CEO position at GE, you would certainly higher "B" because one slightly better decision every year will more than cover the compensation difference. However, if the job is for an assembly line position, you would hire "A" because the impact of the minor difference in competence in what is largely a scripted job would not cover the increased compensation costs of hiring "B".

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    22. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by symbolic · · Score: 1

      Too bad they can't mod up to 6, because this certainly deserves it.

    23. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      That's true of _every_ professional job though - to be competent, you've got to have a lot of schooling, experience (and hopefully some natural intelligence). Many CEOs might work hard, but they're certainly not working 100x as hard as other hard workers in the company.

      I'm still taking exception with your assumption that it is entirely up to the CEO whether a company can be turned around, or whether the company's future is entirely dependent on the decisions of that CEO. That completely ignores all the contributions of all of the people who are implementing the CEO's decisions, and makes it seem like the CEO was singlehandedly responsible for "turning the company around" or "leading the company to excellence".

      In reality, the CEO is just one of many people who are responsible for improving a company's performance, but because of a CEO's close relationship with the shareholders & executive compensation boards, there is a strong psychological tendency for those bodies to give the CEO most of the credit (and therefore most of the compensation).

    24. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Based on the all the stories about lousy CEOs flying around, it hardly seems like you need much experience at all to be a CEO who can drive a business into the ground & come out with a nice golden parachute - you just need to know the right people & be able to scam the stockholders/board into believing you long enough to sign the contract. I'll assume you're talking about begin a _competent_ CEO, which probably does require a fair bit of experience to be able to claim that title.

      Even given a lot of experience, why does that give a CEO the right to claim all the credit for turning around a company or improving its performance? It's not like the CEO did any of the actual field work to implement his/her decisions - all of his directions were implemented by real people. If it weren't for those real people, the CEO's directions would be worthless, no matter how experienced or talented the CEO was. But, for some reason, the CEO somehow manages to get most of the credit (and compensation) for improving a company's performance, while the people doing the actual work which resulted in the company's performance improving are lucky if they don't get laid off during the usual "restructuring".

      Executive compensation is really screwed up nowadays, if you're trying to apply some objective criteria of "fairness" to how each person provides value to the overall organization. The guys who decide on executive compensation are MUCH too cozy with those executives, and don't really have a good way of judging the relative value of those executives compared to the rest of the company, so they end up comparing against what executives at OTHER companies are being compensated (and thereby contribute to the ever-inflating value of executive compensation packages). There's also a natural human tendency to assign a lot of value to the high profile people (like celebrities), whether those people actually deserve that respect or not. This adds to a executive's "perceived" value, but can't really be justified using an objective criteria.

    25. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      Based on the all the stories about lousy CEOs flying around, it hardly seems like you need much experience at all to be a CEO who can drive a business into the ground & come out with a nice golden parachute - you just need to know the right people & be able to scam the stockholders/board into believing you long enough to sign the contract. I'll assume you're talking about begin a _competent_ CEO, which probably does require a fair bit of experience to be able to claim that title.

      Certainly there's a difference between a competent CEO and an incompetent one. I'm sure, however, that it seems like more CEOs are incompetent than not because we only hear about it when a CEO does an absolutely horrible job. How many CEOs out there compared to the number that screw up? And how easy a job is it to screw up? I think there's a lot more talent there than people like to admit.

      Even given a lot of experience, why does that give a CEO the right to claim all the credit for turning around a company or improving its performance? It's not like the CEO did any of the actual field work to implement his/her decisions - all of his directions were implemented by real people. If it weren't for those real people, the CEO's directions would be worthless, no matter how experienced or talented the CEO was. But, for some reason, the CEO somehow manages to get most of the credit (and compensation) for improving a company's performance, while the people doing the actual work which resulted in the company's performance improving are lucky if they don't get laid off during the usual "restructuring"....

      CEOs aren't compensated based on how much actual revenue they bring to the company. There is a fallacy in thinking they should be--if they were, each CEO would have literally hundreds of competing offers from different companies, and if you are running a company, how are you supposed to land one of the better ones? You're correct that they look at what other companies are paying, and there is a certain perception as to what they should be paid, but that's how it is in every field. I did the same thing lately in a job interview--I cited salary.com, and said "this is what people are getting paid for this position." If people hate it so much, they should vote in a board of directors who will do what Ben and Jerry's did, and cap CEO pay at something reasonable (incidently, Blue Bell ice cream has made serious headway in this area over the past few years).

    26. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Indeed; you see such behavior on corporate proxy statements all the time. "Support putting my friends on the board with me!" they basically say.

      Of course, FDR tried to do the same thing in attempting to pack the Supreme Court with his cronies (by attempting to expand the court from 9 to 15 justices during his term in which, presumably, he would be involved in selecting the justices), and Presidential candidates inherently do the same thing. "Elect me and my friends who won't tattle on me!" (unless there is a book deal involved after lame-duckness is achieved, e.g. Scott McLellan on G.W. Bush).

      Packing powerful positions with one's own close accomplices is a natural human behavior; we select those whom we trust most and/or agree-with most...

    27. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that their decisions influence whether the company sinks or soars.
      Theoretically. I haven't noticed this effect in practice.
      Carly Fiorina. Steve Jobs.
      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    28. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      The solution to this nonsense is shareholder activism, which CEOs view the same way a Metternicht viewed the middle class of Europe demanding democracy.

    29. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by supertjx · · Score: 1

      IMHO, anyone who thinks that CEOs are overpaid are underestimating the task of running an organisation. A head of department deals with a small number of subordinates and might be responsible for making sure that the process he is in charge of (might be IT support, Quality Assurance etc) is working properly. Sure he contributes value to the organisation, but how does this compare to: A CEO who runs the whole show, motivating the employees, getting the best out of his employees, sourcing new business, placating current customers, squeezing the suppliers, dealing with regulatory authorities and addressing the needs of a whole host of other stakeholders (shareholders, board of directors blah blah blah). A CEO primarily deals with humans (who are irrational, illogical and a real bitch to work with) and imo, this is a bigger challenge compared to making sure that machines / systems are in working order. Not everyone can do that, and when you find someone who can, you pay top dollar for his services. There will always be underperforming, overpaid CEOs but these people won't stay CEO for long.

    30. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Well, you're making it sound like the better qualified person (by what metric, business school degrees?) will always make the better decisions. IMHO it's a bit more complicated than that.

      Yes, you need a certain mix of knowledge, social skills and elbow grease to qualify for a CEO position and never did I claim that "anyone" could be a CEO.
      The problem is that you cannot measure these skills or really determine whether someone is 5% more competent than someone else. You can only measure the bottom line and in most cases the difference will be surprisingly small when you swap out a CEO or other high level exec for someone equally qualified (in terms of: knowing his craft).

      This is what I mean when I say: no individual can really constantly make such a big difference.
      Especially not in a big company - and we're talking about big when we talk about 7-digit salaries.

      My (idealistic) proposal still stands: Pay them huge bonuses when their decisions bring success to the company. Pay them high salaries if you must but tie them to measurable success, nothing else. Ofcourse that's not how our system works and will never become reality. Greed is rooted very deeply in human nature even when the only difference between owning one yacht or a whole fleet is "do i have more than the other guy?".

    31. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by joleran · · Score: 1

      If giving CEOs a bigger cut of the profits produces incentive for the CEO to increase earnings, it's just good business to give them a bigger cut. Basing their salary off of profits is a great idea - but only if they don't get paid when profits are negative. Richie Rich CEO only gets paid $2 million dollars a year if he fails utterly? Cue violin.

    32. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I probably should have said that I've seen CEOs sink their companies many times--it's the "soar" part I haven't seen first hand...

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    33. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      There will always be underperforming, overpaid CEOs but these people won't stay CEO for long.

      [OK mods, I going to go waaaaay of topic, but I hope it's some relevance to this thread. Mod accordingly if you must.]

      All the pro-CEO talk. I'm not convinced.

      If it's a small or mid sizes business I could see the CEO getting reasonable albeit lopsided compensation.
      It's incredibly difficult running a small business with razor thin profit margins and fighting to stay in a niche market.
      You really are making decisions that determine whether the business lives or dies and if the people
      you hire really stay employed. The CEOs I knew personally in this area were more populists than straight
      business men which I salute and respect. They agonized not for the losses they would suffer, but
      for everyone else. Very rare altruism. The business success rate for those was 50/50, but at the end of the day
      they could sleep better at night.

      The gargantuan businesses. The Fortune 500 and Fortune 100 companies. The CXO [CEO,CTO,CIO,CFO] crowd can screw up miserably
      and pull the rip cord on their parachute almost like any politico retiring for "family reasons".

      If I were a less understanding person I would say we revolt against these people AND their board of directors
      not unlike a political coup. In a twisted sense of democracy, have the employees of these companies vote on
      the fate of their CXOs. The real people would be spared a fate that should justly be served to the sociopaths
      that currently run a majority of our business.

      Compare it to the days of the past. I prime example I give is Milton S. Hershey of Hershey choclate fame.
      A shrewd business man who cared for his workers. When presented with the idea that he could buy machines
      that would do the work of 5 men. Loosely paraphrased he said, "Remove the machine and hire 5 more workers."
      Of course this was also during the American Great depression.

      Flash forward to now. The old factory lies almost dormant. A new automated factory opened a few years ago
      and now a portion of production is also moving to Mexico.

      http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/hersheys.asp

      Guys like Milton S. Hershey are not only rolling over in their graves, their spinning around so fast I could
      use them as a wood lathe.

    34. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of horseshit. Yes that is how the system works in theory. In reality, CEOs are like Bear Sterns: "too big to fail" once they get to that level.

      Look at a person that some geeks will know: Trip Hawkins. He lead 3D0 to make a bunch of shitty Army Men games. The company goes bankrupt, everyone loses their jobs. What happens to good ole Trip?

      He starts a new company, Digital Chocolate, taking money from investors. Why do they give him money? He has run companies before and he's experienced, therefore he is a good businessman. He's able to rest on the laurels of his one success even while creating a failed console, running an entertainment software company into the ground, and completely missing the boat for MMORPGs. Yet he's still a CEO of a company.

      So, let's stop pretending that bad CEOs get punished. All it takes is connections to stay in the game. As GP post says, it is about protecting their own.

    35. Re:it's not compensation, it's booty by snarlingcoyote · · Score: 1

      If giving CEOs a bigger cut of the profits produces incentive for the CEO to increase earnings, it's just good business to give them a bigger cut. That argument only works if the incentive is lost when the CEO fails to increase earnings to such an extent that the CEO feels some real discomfort. In current business practice, if the CEO fails to increase earnings he/she only loses face and power. His/her severance package as stipulated in the executive's package will still be quite generous. It can be successfully argued that this power structure is a major problem in management today - the top positions are filled with individuals whose only reward for doing well is satisfaction, prestige and power. The economic force that makes the rest of us poor slobs do well - being able to live comfortably - just isn't there. Money, for the top tier, has increasingly become an abstract plaything simply because the top tier of wealth in this country has concentrated so much of it. I'm personally of the opinion that if companies were really interested in bringing down costs and increasing profitability, they'd've outsourced their top positions years ago.
  81. interesting,well-paid, legal by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    ... pick any two. That was the only career advice I got. Whether you consider IT boring or interesting depends on the actual job (obviously) and also on your approach. If you are able to think in the abstract then you'll be better suited to an IT job. If you prefer to have tanglible results - to product things you can touch, then a job in a "thought" industry won't suit.

    Sadly, many people think of IT as a job of last resort: if I can't get anything better I'll go into IT. Sadly, a lot of IT companies take on this sort of individual and both sides end up hating the deal.

    Even if your job is dull, that's hardly a problem - afterall that's why people have hobbies

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:interesting,well-paid, legal by herring0 · · Score: 1

      Even if your job is dull, that's hardly a problem - afterall that's why people have hobbies

      But really as with probably most people here my 'hobby' during work happens to be /. which can be interesting enough to fill in those low points.
  82. BEST COMMENT EVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you.

  83. Grease monkeys by Dan+Posluns · · Score: 1

    Each to his own taste, but in my experience IT is incredibly boring.

    I work as a video game programmer. It's fun and challenging and plays to many different fields in computer science.

    Back when I worked in IT, 90% of the chores I did were repetitive and dull. The more hardcore/low-level stuff I did was typically trying to figure out how to get someone else's poorly-documented API to do what I required. Domain expertise was a lot more valuable than problem-solving ever was.

    IT workers are the grease monkeys of the future.

    Dan.

  84. Yes it's Bill's fault by biolysis · · Score: 1

    "Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy? "

    Of course, there were only superstuds and male Adoni working in the industry before he came along.

    Bill is also responsible for making priests look like pedophiles, making Muslims look like terrorists, and making crack whores look toothless.

    1. Re:Yes it's Bill's fault by rob1980 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I don't get that either. It's like people who don't know who Richard Stallman is would look at him and not guess he's holding weekly D&D sessions in his mom's basement or something.

  85. No way, no how. by r1v3t3d · · Score: 1

    I do server software support for IT administrators, and even though in most cases I could run circles around them and do their jobs far better than they could, there's no way in hell I'd want to. IT = Dealing with end users, which is something I will NEVER do again.

    --
    "Oh, Florida. Just think, somewhere in this state, right now, Jeb Bush is eating a live puppy."
  86. Sniglet of the day by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spair - n. The air found within the spare tire in your trunk.

    1. Re:Sniglet of the day by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spair - Adj. Heightened feeling of well being. Opposite of despair.

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    2. Re:Sniglet of the day by beckerist · · Score: 2, Funny

      So...teens acquire the majority of their ... material ... for their "spair time" online? I guess that makes sense.

    3. Re:Sniglet of the day by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, my trunk has a spare tire, but there's no air in it. Only good old fashioned nerd-fat.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  87. Re:That's why they're NON IT grads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't knock it till you've tried it. Just be sure to wash your hands carefully and use sterile equipment. It can be a lot of fun!

    The same advice probably applies to self-catheterization as well.

  88. IT has changed. Life was better then. by mschuyler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first got into computers it was exciting and new. The first computer at my work place was mine, an Apple ][. What could it do? Anything! Look at this Visicalc thing! Then I stuck a CP/M card in and got dBase II. That allowed us to build a complete accounts payable and payroll system (once we got to dBase III). More computers followed. I thought it would be very cool to get a computer on everyone's desk! People were interested and amazed at what you could do with one of these small desktop boxes. More people got involved. Then came Ethernet! Yes! We're networked! And what about gophers and email? And what was this www thing? It ws an exciting time when hobbyists and enthusiasts drove innovation and spearheaded the drive to compute the world. They were seen as intelligent, innovative saviors. To open up a box with a new computer and smell those polymers wafting in the air still gives a sense of progress! The future has arrived (it's just unevenly distributed--William Gibson) but we were evening the distribution! We were changing the world, increasing productivity.

    Well.....Mission accomplished.

    Now there IS a computer on every desk. Now there are more servers than you originally had computers. Now without a flashy web site you are hopelessly behind. Now everyone wants in on the action to tell you what to do. Now if you're down for a second it's all your fault and heads will roll. Now IT is a subservient class with deadlines and 'management.' The corporations, big and small finally got over their wide-eyed enthusiasm and ignorance of the field and yoked it in--hard. It has turned from an art to a science, from innovative to expected, from bleeding edge to basement cubicles.

    The same thing happened with electricity. The same thing happened with radio. And now it's happened with IT. It has gone fom a hobbyist paradise to a mundane backwater. Too bad. Life was better then.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  89. Personality types by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    A very little study of psychology will prove out that people have different personality types. Studies and data such as this would be much more useful if they were correlated against that kind of information. The fact is it is natural for large numbers of people to find working with computers unrewarding. Certainly any 'kenestitic' learner has a genetic disadvantage in this field as does anyone who is so heavily left brained as to not be able to comprehend the machines below the level of the artistic/ languistic abstraction they represent. Not to say some of them wouldn't do well in 'computers' , but they would need to find a sub-field that fit their specific abilities. I've often wondered if the 'gender bias' in the IT industry is not mostly an effect of this kind of issue. Perhaps there are just fewer females to whom this type of work is appealing. I've never seen any real numbers to know one way or another.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  90. Good.. by saboola · · Score: 1

    ..more money for me!

  91. Some experiences... by arhhook · · Score: 1

    That I've had in the last few days include walking to someone's office and showing them that their computer has a power button for when the screen shows 'No Signal.'

    On the other hand, I've done some interesting things with servers, wiring, fiber, SAN's, etc. If you like it, you like it. If you don't, then do something else.

  92. You mean green tech isn't the meaning of life? by heroine · · Score: 1

    Thought this was the technology to rule them all. Don't U get excited about Java specs and making a twinky router take 1% less energy to sleep?

  93. Boring not relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done a lot of development. I can think only of one project that was boring. *That* project eventually shipped with our main project and was instrumental in getting me a nice raise that year.

    Moral of the story: Boring = money. Frequently.

    The controller at your company. Interesting job? Probably not. Well paying job? Definitely.

    How about the facility manager of your building (i.e. head janitor) - Interesting? Please... 6-figure salary? Absolutely.

    Life is not TV or the internet. What you see there has *NO* correlation with real life when it comes to jobs, or much else, for that matter. Nobody cares if you're interested or not. Nobody cares about your interests at all. Only performance matters. A fact which is going to come as a *very* rude shock to the "millenial" generation (and has to the one's I've fired after two weeks).

    Cheers!

  94. Why would more want to work in IT? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Everyone is on the web now? So what? Everyone drives a car and not many aspire to be auto factory workers. Everyone has a phone, and that doesn't drive people into the telecom industry. Everyone uses a toilet, but I don't see people lining up to work for the sewer company.

    I'm confused as to the whole basis of "more people use it, so more should be wanting to goin into that as their industry." People choose work because they like it (or think they will) or they want the money/prestige that goes with it. Often people choose to do something other than what they already do a lot. Haven't you heard people say "I've been XXX all day long, I don't want to do that at home." That implies that becoming a plumber will sour you on doing the plumbing around your own house, or coding all day long will make you tired of coding so you won't keep your website up to date.

  95. Anecdote by RomulusNR · · Score: 2, Informative

    I started college as a journalism major. In my second quarter, we were each assigned a classmate to interview. Mine was a girl who had entered college as a CS major (a path which I would tread backwards on less than two years later).

    Her reason for switching: "I didn't realize it was just programming all day".

    I don't remember whether I asked her what she expected or what she said. I suppose that has something to do with why I didn't stay in J-school.

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  96. and honestly... by aikodude · · Score: 0

    let them keep thinking that. I tried to convince a nephew that programming is cool, keeps you constantly challenged, makes the days go by quicker, like playing video games for a living, etc.

    he chose accountant! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

    let them stay out of the field. i only have about 25 years til retirement. :P :)

  97. darn you bill gates! by binarybum · · Score: 1

    while i'm sure that this is completely bill gates's fault, i would also like to attribute high gas prices and cancer to the list of societal ills he is responsible for.

    any objections? ok, good.

    --
    ôó
  98. As long as it's 9-5 by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Although my primary goal as a kid was to be a game programmer, by the time I was old enough to actually pursue the career I realized what a crappy job it is with long hours. So I do web development instead and was careful when choosing jobs to ensure I'd only be working mon-fri from about 9-5. That gives me plenty of free time to spend time with the family and work on my own personal game/web projects. I also make enough that my wife doesn't have to work and we can still have nice things.

    As long as the pay is good and it doesn't ruin your life then it's a good job. An "exciting" job that ruins your homelife isn't worth having either. And unfortunatly, most high paying jobs either demand long hours or they're "boring" tech jobs.

    The other thing people tend to forget is that all jobs are pretty boring. It's the people you work with that make them enjoyable.

  99. Obligatory automobile analogy by sunderland56 · · Score: 1
    Computer jobs are like auto industry jobs. And who doesn't want to work in the auto industry?
    • Software developers are like automobile engineers: exciting work, developing new products that customers will want.
    • IT workers are like auto mechanics. Nothing to do until something goes wrong. If some engineer did something wrong, you'll get a steady stream of work patching up their mistake.
    Yeah, sure, there are a few auto mechanics with incredibly great jobs (like working for a Formula 1 team). But the vast majority of IT jobs are as exciting as changing oil at the corner gas station.
  100. Service jobs by qbzzt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A lot of service jobs do involve a high level of skills. If you don't believe me ask your doctor.

    The fact is we've gotten really good at manufacturing. So good that the manufacturing we need can be done by a lot less people (just as agriculture now requires a lot less people than it used to). Services are a lot harder to optimize because you can't stockpile them.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:Service jobs by Lord_Frederick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We've also gotten really good at manufacturing our goods in countries where labor costs a tenth as much.

  101. It is by chazzf · · Score: 1

    90% of the time it is boring, repetitive and soul-sucking--like most jobs. Then I go home for the day and spend time with family and friends.

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  102. Paperwork overhead is a serious thing! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the level of detail required in my reports seems like this:

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2008/4/23/

    The coding itself is actually very good where the work/paperwork ratio is concerned, but the other stuff I do is terrible...ooh I logged out and logged back in on this user's PC to un-hang it, I better make a note of that. Oh I just helped someone set up a job on the copier, better make a note of that too!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  103. False by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

    If you don't pay them, they can't afford to do the job, no matter how much they like it.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:False by joleran · · Score: 1

      If a job is fulfilling all by itself, if would provide for basic needs such as food and lodging.

  104. Bad summary by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    Summary:

    Despite good job prospects, graduates think that a job in IT would be boring.

    The first line of TFA:

    Non-IT graduates think a job in IT would be "boring," despite its good career prospects, according to the Career Development Organisation (CDO).

    Maybe that's why they're non-IT graduates. Why in heck would someone want to study for a profession that is not interesting? My God, we've got enough people who are miserable in their jobs; why try to convince more of them to do the same?

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  105. I spoke at a school for career day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to a bunch of jr high kids.. and the message I got from them was "sitting at a desk all day must be so boring".. which is something I never really thought about until I'd had a job for awhile.. sitting at a desk all day truly sucks.

  106. Not a global phenomenon, thankfully by kalari · · Score: 1

    Good thing all the new grads in Eastern Europe and China and India don't think the same way as these guys. These are the same people who will be complaining about IT jobs going overseas, in a few years.

  107. C'mon folks... by lazyDog86 · · Score: 1

    Look at all the discussion here. Each comment was made by someone who was a little bored at the time and bounced over to /. to see what was up.

    There might be a, shall we say, kernel of truth here.

    --
    my insights may be modded Funny, but at least some of my jokes are modded Insightful
  108. IT is boring unless you are at the top by mytec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is especially true the lower you are on the ladder. When you are entry level, you are probably doing help desk most of the time along with setting up new machines. Sure, when you get that eight core computer in, the computer is probably pretty exciting to check out and play around a bit while you install what is needed, but after a few installs, it's simply repetitive -- just like all the other computers you have set up and will continue to set up. Maybe you get to write reports. You'll definitely awe your friends with how you successfully joined 10 tables to create your latest report.

    I think IT gets more exciting and interesting when you reach the point where you are creating solutions to new problems. There is a great deal of responsibility but a much greater feeling of reward and satisfaction. I think the saying about the lead dog having the best view is true and not just in IT.

    I enjoyed reading the comment where someone said that IT is like janitorial work.

  109. Come on, RTFA! by TechForensics · · Score: 1

    All the article notes is that a proportion of NON - I.T. grads *THINK* that I.T. would be boring.

    Where is the news here? Very poor summary.

    --
    Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
  110. How Gates has made tech support boring by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    "Thank you for calling, how may I help you? I see. *sigh* Click 'Allow'. There you go, have a nice day."

    "Thank you for calling, how may I help you? Oh really? *sigh* Click 'Allow'. Thanks for calling."

    "Thank you for calling, how may I help you? Oh for Chris-- *sigh* Click 'Allow'. Yeah good, bye."

  111. Spellcheck anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'spare,' not 'spair.'

  112. Exciting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are crazy, IT is super exciting! Last Friday I had preventative maintenance which was a blast! Then just yesterday I sat around all day waiting for something to break. Last but not least today was the best yet; I restarted some DTS jobs and cleaned up a log file!!!!

    Would I say that IT/IS/MIS/ISS is boring? You bet your ass it is, however, that isn't always the case. You might go weeks without anything major going on, but then all of the sudden youâ(TM)re flooded with things that need to be done yesterday. Like any job it has its ups and downs, itâ(TM)s just that in our case poking around on the internet to keep up on technology is a requirement ;)

  113. That damned Yao Ming! by unassimilatible · · Score: 2, Funny

    Making the NBA look tall.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  114. WOW I thought I was alone ... feeling that way. by virtualthinker · · Score: 1

    They would be right about that. I used to be too busy to be bored, then some business genius decided to send the non-boring part to some other shore. The only part of IT that was NEVER boring was the making of PL/1 or REXX code ...

  115. Obvious by Phairdon · · Score: 0

    Anything that takes more than the average 'smarts' to accomplish is considered nerdy in our culture (America).

    This is because the people with average or less smarts have to make fun of the smart people to feel better about themselves, and since the percentage of smart people is so small, the dominant ideology takes hold.

    Basically:

    Are you a smart kid in grades K-12 who likes science? Nerd. Percentage of kids: 15%

    Are you an idiot who plays second string on the football team and who's brain can't grasp anything beyond business classes? Cool. Percentage of kids: 85%

    I'd rather be a nerd. Of course most of the population would think IT or science is boring, because they can't mentally do it so they demote it to boring or nerdy. Additionally, 74% of statistics are made up on the spot.

    What I find amusing is that almost everybody watches cable tv or uses a cell phone, and they do not realize that is all thanks to the computer/aerospace/electrical nerds for putting together the rockets/satellites/programs/etc that makes it possible.

  116. Boring ... and engineering by golodh · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Perhaps it's a sign that the IT industry is growing up. Writing software is becoming much more like engineering and a lot less like pioneering.

    Engineering in all its facets (from civil engineering to mechanical engineering to chemical engineering) is sometimes considered "boring" too.

    From what I understand this is because you need a lot of background knowledge, and unless you're extremely good you won't find much scope for technical innovation. You'll primarily be applying knowledge, not inventing it.

    E.g. in the case of structural engineering using standard components, standard materials, and standard constructions. It's only when you work for a specialised engineering design company that you get to do state-of-the-art finite element calculations on brand-new structures. Other companies just use standard design rules to dimension standard components in standard structures, the trick being to satisfy all requirements in the cheapest possible way in the least possible time. Day in day out.

    So you'll generally have to find expression for your creativity by getting things done on time and within budget instead pushing the envelope, and as soon as you're doing that you'll tend to shy away from wild innovation.

    With software development there simply is a lot of (to me elegant and beautiful, to others dead and boring) scientific background knowledge you should have (algorithms, data-structures, compiler design, finite automata, complexity theory, concurrency theory, discrete mathematics, and numerical mathematics) supplemented by more applied knowledge like the principles of software engineering, in-depth knowledge of at least three programming languages (C, C++, Java), some experience with the object hierarchy underlying modern GUIs, and probably a lot I forgot.

    And when you've done all that and appear for your first job, you may find you'll be on some project team and entrusted with responsibility for building component X of subsystem Y according to specifications someone will give you. You write your code, construct your test-cases, and verify correctness, document your functions, check in your code, and rush off to the next specification you'll implement because you've got to meet productivity standards or you're out.

    This might seem a little pessimistic, and I'm sure that in many companies who use a seat-of-the-pants approach to software engineering things are more exciting. Like being given a huge poorly documented codebase to maintain. But generally speaking I don't think it is. There is (thankfully) an awful lot of this engineering-type work in software production, and only those who excel will, in time, become the lead programmers, designers, and system architects who actually dream up and shape end products.

    Some people, and especially those who dream of designing a new supercool system to fly aircraft do indeed find the prospect of maintaining payslip applications on mainframes, automatic teller machine software, book-ordering software and inventory management systems, and crufty little custom data-entry packages boring. And perhaps they're right.

    As I see it, most software engineering tends to be a bit unspectacular when done right, and excitement mostly enters the equation if you make serious mistakes. Of course there will be exceptions, like the Mars landers. But not everyone can be a programmer at NASA.

    1. Re:Boring ... and engineering by khallow · · Score: 1

      OTOH, programming requires a lot less infrastructure than other forms of engineering and it can be made more visible (eg, stick it on a website) than other forms of engineering.

  117. Individually Subjective by v3xt0r · · Score: 1

    Some IT jobs are very boring. Some Web jobs are also boring. I'd much rather be bored, sitting in front of my computer w/ headphones and good coffee, w/ a nice looking secretary, than waiting tables, serving coffee, or being an annoying salesmen.

    Some IT jobs are challenging, which can be interesting, depending on what challenges interest you. If you're not interested in being challenged, then I guess, I'll take fries with my burger, thanks.

    If I was right out of school, I'd want to partner-up w/ some people close to my age, start a small venture, and learn to make it a fun place to work. It may not be google, but it doesn't have to be a mortuary, either. One of the coolest jobs I had was working 2 doors from the beach, writing code, and watching all the hot women roll around all day. Very distracting, but also very motivating to get my work done and get out of there. =-p

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
    1. Re:Individually Subjective by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      You have a secretary? Luxury!

  118. "Despite good job prospects???" by RPGonAS400 · · Score: 1

    The part that is questionable to me is the "good job prospects" part. There are good prospects it seems if you live in India, but what I see is a shrinking job pool in the U.S.

  119. Boring Jobs in IT. by cryptodan · · Score: 1

    The only boring jobs in IT are IDS/IPS when nothing is happening. All others are pretty exciting.

  120. Nerdy? I wish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Computer programming was once nerdy, but it's not any more.

    Modern professional programming has gone waaay away from inspiring visionaries, genius, creativity, and mystery, and waaaay over to the bureaucratic, unchanging, stifling, rigid, and controlled.

    But, on the plus side, you don't have to wear a suit and tie. So I guess there is that; One vestigial remnant from a glorious day in the distant past.

    "Alan Kay? Ken Thompson? Just what the hell are you talking about?" -- just about every coworker.

    What is devastating to me, is to know, from first hand direct contact, what kinds of things computer programming can be. And also to know, from the pragmatics of the existing order, that we won't make much progress towards even envisioning possibilities.

    Our noses are rubbed in the gutter of entrepreneurs and the seekers of riches.

    Who I seek out are intuitives, artisans, feelers, creatives, math nerds, and inspired programmers.

    Artists form art coops. We need programming coops. Not just across the Internet -- in the material world.

  121. New Flash: IT *is* boring! by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

    As it should be. If you want new and interesting problems, work in Technical Support. Or become a Software Engineer or Computer Scientist.

  122. Re:Twenty-five years in, and I disagree by throatmonster · · Score: 1

    Then again, I've always worked at smaller organizations and therefore IT work has always had a great deal of variety. I have a very strong creative drive, but can't do graphic arts worth a shit. Database development, web app development, troubleshooting (at least the truly oddball problems), and helping others has been very rewarding for me personally, if no so much financially. I've always been able to provide what my family has needed, but never buy that Porsche. Oh well, I prefer riding my bike anyway.

    My problems have always come from the Peter Principle (I'm just not a good supervisor or middle manager) or the inevitable expansion of my dream "one person IT shop" job into being just a cog in the machine.

    I think those dream "one person IT shop" jobs are gone now. My definition of IT (support, hardware/infrastructure, DB and Web App development) just isn't done on a personal scale anymore. The small companies just outsource to big churn shops.

    --
    All pass beyond reach of medicine. None pass beyond the reach of love.
  123. salary, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe because recent college graduates that go into IT get paid pretty poorly compared to their peers? Unfortunately, I am a fairly recent college grad, work in IT, and get paid pretty poorly, and it's causing me to re-think my career goals. Before anyone says anything, I am looking for a new job, just haven't had much luck yet.

  124. Face it, IT *is* boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It really doesn't take long to learn everything to learn about the job. Most of it gets to be routine.

    And you are never actually doing anything real, you are supporting others who actually make the money in the organization. That's why IT is seen as a cost center and cut to save expense or sent overseas. So I gave up on IT.

  125. Meme? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious about this meme. Do you say this to discourage competition? Wouldn't your time be better spent working on your CV?

  126. Fine by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laws of Demand and Supply. If supply is limited because new people are not coming in and the demand is static or rising, then price increases. More money for me, let the sheep dwell in the highly competitive 'fun' industries whilst I'm earning twice what they earn.
    Fine by me

  127. So what are good jobs for a CS graduate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently graduated with a CS degree and four years working for a tech support team at my university (my "experience"). My department is clueless (punchcard programming FTW), so I'm on my own at this. What are some good jobs? Any advice at all? Thanks so much.

  128. young person by Pvt.+Cthulhu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i myself am a young person, and i spend the vast majority of my (and everybody else's) time in front of the computer. at school, if people have a computer problem, i'm pretty high on the list of who to go to, and i like that just fine. However, getting a job in it seems like the most boring thing imaginable. I spend enough time in front of a computer, and i don't want work mixed in with that. i would much prefer a cool job like something in biochemistry. Making pigs glow in the dark sounds infinitely more rewording than running helpdesk.

    1. Re:young person by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      On the other side of the coin, IT sounds like a blessing for me. I would be happy to tire myself from computers at work, because I don't get sick of the computer itself, just the tasks that I am doing on one. I'm happy to spend all day at work screwing with spreadsheets only to go home and fire up a game, or a synthesizing suite, or a modeling program, or a web browser... etc

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:young person by Pvt.+Cthulhu · · Score: 1

      i think it would get real old real fast. if my eyes are bleeding, i want it to be because i'm blowing stuff up (on the computer or not), not from staring at spreadsheets from 9 to 5.

    3. Re:young person by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I didn't write that as clear as I could.. currently I muck with spreadsheets etc all day. I think IT would be an improvement.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  129. Less than boring... by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

    Where's the future in it? All the jobs are going to the new slave labor from India, working at rates well below a living wage for people who have to actually PAY for their education. Why go into a job with no future? You can still do IT as a hobby while you do something that pays the bills.

    --
    If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
  130. Sketchy Analogies by superdan2k · · Score: 1

    "Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spair time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?"

    I don't see how you can logically draw this conclusion. Prior to the Internet, we lived in a very TV-centric society (from an information flow point of view), and not everyone wanted a job in TV.

    We live in a very car-centric culture now -- how many people do you see clamoring to design car parts or work in gas stations?

    Just because there's a generational shift toward something "new" doesn't necessarily imply that everyone wants a job working in that field.

    --
    blog |
  131. Amen!. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez -- you would think that nobody on /. owns a mirror! Gates made the profession look nerdy?!?!?!

    Denial -- it's just a river in Egypt, I guess... :^) :^) :^) :^)

  132. "Surely ... we'd expect more of them ..." by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Lots of people also watch TV. It doesn't necessarily mean that most of them are interested in TV electronics, or in becoming TV engineers.

    The TV (like the internet) is a window. What's interesting is what's on the other side. It's the content that interests, not the enabling mechanism. If you spend a lot of time with your eyes trained at a window, it doesn't necessarily mean that you are fascinated by glass.

  133. Good let them stay away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low supply high demand, means more pay for the shrinking talent pool (a.k.a more money for me).
    Or maybe they will start to outsource the jobs which sucks.

  134. TFA Author is Captain Obvious by Necrotica · · Score: 1

    Non-IT graduates think a job in IT would be "boring," despite its good career prospects, according to the Career Development Organisation (CDO).

    Good thing they're not IT graduates then. Yeesh.

  135. Working in IT is not boring, but... by Anarchitektur · · Score: 1

    ...working in an IT department is. There's a big difference, the way I see it.

    I don't fit the article's demographic since I went to school and graduated fully intending to go into IT, but speaking from my experience, it isn't the industry or the work that bores me, it is the environment in which I have to do it. There's only so many times you can repair Outlook before you start to resent the ignorance of your users for making you have to repeat such mundane work when there's much more interesting things out there to be done. After working technical support and then being a system administrator, I decided very quickly that if I didn't change my career path, I'd soon become an artist-- painting the wall with my brains.

    Monotony aside, most of the work you do is totally thankless. Nobody cares, much less thinks about, that beautiful load-balanced SQL cluster you just put into place and how much it boosts performance and how it has an amazing up-time. IT people only have visibility when something is broken. The IT infrastructure may be important to the business, but the people who keep that infrastructure intact aren't valued or respected. Part of this has to do with the image that many IT professionals give (i.e. the neck beard-sporting slob who has never worn a tie in his life), but it also has a lot to do with the nature of non-technical people. They only remember the 1 day where all email was down... not the 364 days when it was working flawlessly.

    I don't know about anyone else, but I get bored listening to non-technical plebes ranting about how important it is that you drop everything to restore their deleted PowerPoint presentation. That's the kind of work that gets schilled out in IT departments, so, as far as I'm concerned, fuck that noise. Now that I'm doing consulting, I'll never go back. It lets me focus on the technical challenges I enjoy without all the IT department bullshit that goes along with it.

  136. IT IS boring, and it *shouldn't* be by zullnero · · Score: 1

    There are definitely corners of the IT Profession that are ridiculously dull. If you want to know if what you do for a living is boring, try saying what you do while looking at yourself in a mirror. That right there is what you are.

    "I change tapes in the backup machine and start the automated build process for a living". Everything you do can and should be done by robots already.

    What is sad, though, is that when a field becomes so mindlessly dull, that's exactly the sort of person that works within it. The kind of person that works there for a paycheck and nothing else. And there's really no good reason for it either, considering what tools we have at our disposal. Teleconferencing, remote management...there's no good reason besides stodgy old farts that don't want to learn how to do something braindead simple as to learn how to use the conferencing or chat feature in their IM and insist on having you in your cube to assuage their fear of you goofing off at work. If you get your job done in IT, it should be fairly obvious as networks and databases wouldn't be broken all the freaking time. And that doesn't even cover what managers can do in regards to cross-training and research projects to keep people interested.

    Kids come out thinking it's all Dilbert and Office Space. The key to Dilbert and Office Space is that those are two fine examples of what you shouldn't ever allow yourself to become. That's the whole point of both.

  137. I think I know why this is. by endus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this phenomenon is mostly due to the fact that most IT jobs are boring. I know its a radical, outlandish theory, but it has a firm basis in fact. How many people do you know that work in IT and mostly surf the web for a living? Answer: a lot.

    Boring...or insanely stressful and overly demanding of your time.

    1. Re:I think I know why this is. by Falconhell · · Score: 0

      True enough, though I reckon if you have time to surf the net, you must have your systems running pretty well!( I spend a LOT of time surfing, and have a very low down time (Total 4 hours in the last 5 years, and that was becuase of an unexpected server death)

  138. Idiot OP by endeavour31 · · Score: 1

    Do you think you could have outlined the post without the stupid reference to Bill Gates? Oh, I forgot - this is slashdot.

    For once it would be nice to have a post without the diatribe.

    1. Re:Idiot OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lemmings have a hard time thinking for themselves. as much as slashdot caws on about freedom and civil rights there is as much groupthink here as anywhere else. and if you're not part of the group there is a price to be paid....

  139. But it IS boring for the most part by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    But then again, aren't most jobs? If they are fun, its not a job.

    Besides, fewer kids coming into the market? That's a good thing as we are over loaded now.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  140. and you can expand upon this by goldcd · · Score: 1

    Higher the demand, the lesser the skill pool and the more unpleasant the work - the more money you'll get.

  141. No by biolysis · · Score: 1

    "You mean during the heyday of Bell Labs, when they were dumping money into R&D, and inventing things like a little language named C, a little operating system named Unix, the electret microphone, the CO2 LASER, and the first 32-bit microprocessor? Yeah, who would want to work there? "

    No, he means the phone company. Why are you bringing up a research laboratory?

    1. Re:No by omeomi · · Score: 1

      No, he means the phone company. Why are you bringing up a research laboratory?

      Until they were broken up by the federal government in the 80's, the phone company and the research laboratory were the same company.

  142. Look at the evolution of the area you're in. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    The problem with most views is that they don't look at the evolution of technology as a way of 'spicing up' IT...

    Storage is often looked at as one of the most boring areas... we've gone from parallel scsi, to FibreChannel and now we're moving to FCoE (FibreChannel over ethernet). Disk arrays aren't just dumb raid boxes, but require knowledge of applications so the storage engineer can provide the right DR solution to the application owners (offsite replication, snapshots etc..).

    With servers we've gone from client/server, to the 1U 'pizza boxes' of the dotcom era, and now we're moving into virtualized servers (VMware...).

    Even with telephony, we're moving from old PBXs to VOIP and converged networks (Voice, data and storage), there's something there for the networking folks as well.

    If you look in the mirror and say, "I've been doing the same thing for 5 years and I'm bored of it." Don't quit IT, just find somewhere else in IT to transition to. And don't blame your mgr, the industry or ComputerWorld, go ahead and blame yourself for not realizing you could get off your butt do something a bit more interesting.

  143. Probably because IT jobs ARE boring. by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    Entry-level IT jobs usually mean a whole lot of grunt-work, answering to morons who are living proof of the Peter Principle, and having to listen to users who don't know their ass from their elbow coupled with no desire to learn the difference lest they be held accountable for it.

  144. "Nerdy?" by Illbay · · Score: 1
    I don't think that's it at all.


    It's because it has become a very mundane trade. Most folks in IT (and I'm not one) have less than a four-year diploma, and do less-than-exciting fetch-and-carry tasks all day long. Of course, there's much more to IT than that, but that's what people mostly see, including college kids who work summer jobs or internships.

    It's similar to the practice of architecture. Architects have this "cachet," but in reality only a VERY few architects ever attain those high-rung jobs where they design dazzling buildings and have Hollywood celebs attend their ribbon-cutting ceremonies. The great majority of them work in mundane jobs "designing" cookie-cutter buildings for mass production (BSW Architects in Tulsa, Oklahoma does all the "architecture" for Wal-Mart, for instance. Big shiny office, the partners make lots of money, but the majority of the designers toil in relative obscurity turning out site-adapt plans for the handful of prototypes they use).

    Many kids planning careers in architecture get turned off once they experience the REAL WORLD of working in an architectural office. I think IT wannabes are pretty much in the same mindset once they've seen they're not going to be working on the next version of "DOOM" (even if they go to work for ID).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  145. IT is boring because it is everyone has access by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

    Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spair time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?"

    Actually I would expect just the opposite, it's the mundane everydayness if IT and the web which leads to it's preception as boring.

    Show me an IT project which could be thought of as cool and breaking new ground, there aren't really any. There are incremental improvements, over what went before but nothing like 60s 70s and maybe the 80s when every new project was something new if only in a geeky way.

    IT has become a commodatity market, good for lowering prices, not good for making interesting work.

    --
    These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
  146. Depends on the skillset too by phorm · · Score: 1

    In a lot of cases, you don't need a lot of major skills/education to become a janitor or a farm-hand. Yes, you have be dedicated enough to do the job, but it's not often something that takes a lot of brains, or - depending on the actual tasks - brawn. It does take the ability to put up with some things beyond which other people are willing to do though, and I've actually seen some janitors that get paid pretty damn good.

  147. Idiocracy lives! by sheepofblue · · Score: 1

    Yep Mike Judge has it correct and we are headed toward an idiocracy (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/). Smart is no longer respected. If you want respect be a thug or pervert. Even better be good at pretending to be someone else. Be a manipulator of people and you can make millions but actually create something LOL!

    In the 60's while huge advances were being made the title of scientist meant a lot. Now it is a negative.

  148. Re:Twenty-five years in, and I disagree by sasserstyl · · Score: 1

    ...DB and Web App development) just isn't done on a personal scale anymore. The small companies just outsource to big churn shops.

    Totally wrong - the big churn shops increasingly outsource to the specialists; either sme specialist businesses or individual contractors, because even though their hourly rate is a lot higher, they have the benefit of knowing what the hell they're doing.

  149. IT = Building Mainanence by Quantus347 · · Score: 1

    Most IT departments today just dont do much in the way of innovation. If Technology isn't the main thing a given company does, odd are it will think of the IT Department as simply people to call and fix those minor annoyances.

    A computer savy graduate doesn't want to spend his time running network cables and resetting passwords. It would be like a mechanical engineer getting out of school and wanting to work in an auto-garage.

    --
    Common Sense isn't as Common as people think...
  150. Looking for jobs? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Why are people with university degrees "looking for jobs?" These are the people who should be *creating* jobs.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Looking for jobs? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Why are people with university degrees "looking for jobs?" These are the people who should be *creating* jobs.
      We can't all be entrepreneurs.
    2. Re:Looking for jobs? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >We can't all be entrepreneurs.

      I'm not convinced of that, actually. We don't all choose a path that makes us "employer" and not "employee",
      but I believe that most have opportunities.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  151. In other news... by Tetrad_of_doom · · Score: 1

    IT industry shuns new graduates as "lazy."

  152. Yeah about that... by biolysis · · Score: 1

    "In 1925 Western Electric Research Laboratories and part of the engineering department of AT&T were consolidated to form Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. as a separate entity."

    Aside from that, however, in normal conversation, when one says "phone company", one does not mean "research laboratory" and vice versa. I realize slashdotters have an overwhelming need for pedantically analyzing everything in hopes of finding some inconsistency to point out in order to prove their intelligence. In this case however, it would be difficult for an intelligent person to claim that when one says "phone company" one means "research laboratory".

    1. Re:Yeah about that... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Aside from that, however, in normal conversation, when one says "phone company", one does not mean "research laboratory" and vice versa.

      Now, yes. And I don't claim to know everything about the history of Bell Labs, but back in the 70s and early 80s, at least, Bell Labs was a part of AT&T. When I was a kid, my dad worked on 4ESS for "AT&T Bell Labs". After the divestiture, it became AT&T, and later Lucent, but back then it was one and the same.

    2. Re:Yeah about that... by biolysis · · Score: 1

      "Bell Labs, but back in the 70s and early 80s, at least, Bell Labs was a part of AT&T."

      NO IT WASN'T

      "Also in 1984, a divestiture agreement with the American Federal government forced the break-up of AT&T: Bellcore (now Telcordia Technologies) was split off from Bell Laboratories to provide the same R&D functions for the newly created local exchange carriers. AT&T also was limited to using the Bell trademark only in association with Bell Laboratories. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., was then renamed AT&T Bell Laboratories, Inc., and became a wholly owned company of the new AT&T Technologies unit"

      You are wrong. Bell Labs was a separate entity until 1984. Not "in the 70's and early 80's".

      We're done, you're just repeating the same factually incorrect assertion without bothering to look up WTF you're discussing.

    3. Re:Yeah about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you fucking read??

      The Wikipedia article you quoted from starts out with this:

      "Ownership of Bell Laboratories was evenly split between AT&T and Western Electric"

      If you look up Western Electric, you find this:

      "Western Electric Company (sometimes abbreviated WE and WECo) was an American electrical engineering company, the manufacturing arm of AT&T from 1881 to 1995." ...
      "Other divisions of AT&T and parts of the Bell System included Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. (Bell Labs), AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric, the manufacturing arm."

      Adds up to AT&T owning Bell Labs until 1984, so that includes the "'70s and early '80s", dumbshit.

    4. Re:Yeah about that... by biolysis · · Score: 1

      Can't you fucking read??

      Better than you as evidenced by your post.

      The Wikipedia article you quoted from starts out with this:

      "Ownership of Bell Laboratories was evenly split between AT&T and Western Electric

      No it doesn't you stupid lying fuck.

      It starts out with THIS

      "In 1925 Western Electric Research Laboratories and part of the engineering department of AT&T were consolidated to form Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. as a separate entity."

      THAT sentence is RIGHT BEFORE the one you posted. Not only are you wrong, you're a lying twat, who intentionally avoided the sentence I posted in order to pretend you weren't a fucking moron.

      Look up what "separate entity" means and then die from AIDS.

    5. Re:Yeah about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it doesn't you stupid lying fuck.
      It starts out with THIS
      "In 1925 Western Electric Research Laboratories and part of the engineering department of AT&T were consolidated to form Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. as a separate entity."

      "Separate entity" does not mean "independently owned," I don't know where you get that idea.

      Read the Western Electric article again, dumbass:

      "Western Electric-made phones were owned not by individual customers, but by local Bell System telephone companies -- all of which were in turn owned by AT&T, which also owned Western Electric itself."

      Now, if AT&T owned 50% of Bell Labs, and Western Electric owned the other 50%, and AT&T bought out Western Electric, where does that leave the ownership??

      It's no big deal to be wrong - we're all wrong sometimes, after all. It just must be really depressing to be as spectacularly wrong as you and still be such an arrogant prick about it!

    6. Re:Yeah about that... by biolysis · · Score: 1

      ""Separate entity" does not mean "independently owned," I don't know where you get that idea. "

      I never said it did, but it DOES mean "separate from AT&T" no matter how much your ignorant ass wishes otherwise.

      "Now, if AT&T owned 50% of Bell Labs, and Western Electric owned the other 50%, and AT&T bought out Western Electric, where does that leave the ownership?? "

      What does it matter idiot? Ownership doesn't mean a fucking thing when it comes to the connectedness of the companies.

      Which you know, and hate, and can't in any way refute.

      "It's no big deal to be wrong - we're all wrong sometimes"

      Like you are now.

      They were separate. It doesn't mean a fucking thing that part of the company was owned by AT&T, they were separate.

      "It just must be really depressing to be as spectacularly wrong as you and still be such an arrogant prick about it!"

      Were the separate or not? YES OR NO?

      Exactly. Fuck of now.

    7. Re:Yeah about that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "Separate entity" does not mean "independently owned," I don't know where you get that idea. "
      > I never said it did, but it DOES mean "separate from AT&T" no matter how much your ignorant ass wishes otherwise.

      The original poster said Bell Labs was part of AT&T, which it was. AT&T owned it before the breakup.

      In your very first reply, you quoted this line:

      "divestiture agreement with the American Federal government forced the break-up of AT&T: Bellcore (now Telcordia Technologies) was split off from Bell Laboratories to provide the same R&D functions for the newly created local exchange carriers."

      Now how the hell was Bellcore split off from Bell Labs in the breakup of AT&T if it was a separate entity!? If it was truly separate, and not part of AT&T, it would have been unaffected by the breakup.

      > They were separate. It doesn't mean a fucking thing that part of the company was owned by AT&T, they were separate.

      AT&T held sway. They said 'jump', Bell Labs jumped. If AT&T said close up shop, Bell Labs would have had to close up shop. Not as separate as you want to believe.

      > Were the separate or not? YES OR NO?

      Separately managed, yes. Separately owned, no.

      > Exactly. Fuck of now.

      You first, you stubborn, arrogant, thick-headed moron.

  153. Obvious by Tadrith · · Score: 1

    There is a reason it's called work, and not play.

    All jobs are boring. That is their nature, because you are essentially forced by your need to survive to do that which you would not voluntarily do without compensation. Even when you ARE doing something you would voluntarily do, control as to when and how you do it is stripped from you, so it becomes boring anyway.

    Work will always be boring. Just work doing something you have a talent for. It won't make work a daily joy to do, but it will make it more tolerable. If you're lucky, sometimes it will even coincide with what you WANT to do, and then it actually does become fun. It just won't remain that way. :)

  154. We're hiring by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

    We actually have a rule to get someone within a year of graduation, or on the way to graduation. The requirements seem a bit dumbed down, but it's in systems programming. The pickings have been slim so far. Good luck.

    1. Re:We're hiring by ACAx1985 · · Score: 1

      What is your company / how can I contact?

    2. Re:We're hiring by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'd prefer not to give out anything more, even anonymously. Check your usual sources.

  155. Truly Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got into IT at the end of the 70's and every day was interesting and fun until a bunch of large companies turned it into a commodity business. Ever since, there has been no real innovation. We're down to PC and Mac and even THEY use the same CPU now. CPU speed is has flattened out so they just throw more cores at you every other year leaving the only decent CPU to the Sony Playstation 3.

    As for the career part, I have 4 (count em) managers that think Excel is a database and their only claim to fame is a degree in business administration (I have one of those too but also my Engineering degree).

    The problem is not with IT, the problem is with the folks that count the $$$. They don't understand the technology and that filters down through almost every organization and stifles creativity (thus creating boredom).

    If you want to be in IT and not bored, get a job in another industry and write open source software in your spare time. It will be both fulfilling and challenging.

    Rant over.

  156. Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood has ruined jobs for a lot of people. They are expecting to go into IT and be the superhero that they see in movies or TV that can save the business with the flick of their wrist.

  157. Where ARE all these jobs? by olokiop · · Score: 1

    I graduated with a degree in IT last year and I have yet to find a job, where are all these supposed 'jobs'?

    1. Re:Where ARE all these jobs? by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      A degree in IT? Or a degree in Computer Science? One is a potential door opener in the working world, the other is just a stop on the way to the unemployment line or 5 years to a PhD (and underpaid post-doc positions, no chance of tenure, until you give up and become manager of a Tire shop). I leave you to guess...

      --
      Here come da fudge!
  158. Bill Gates in IT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're really stretching it here. Bill Gates did not work in IT. Look up IT and Information Systems. He developed an Operating System, hardly IT work. Doing IT work for your average company would suck and be boring. Computer Science is far more exciting and cutting edge than IT.

  159. Thank god for that by swordfish666 · · Score: 1

    Now I won't have to teach them b!7ch3s how to be a slackers and still GTD. But I do agree with the thinking that IT jobs no longer hold the elite/cool factor they did in 1997. Now a days it's, "Oh you don't like the spec? What do you mean vacation! Do the f@ck!n9 work or I'll replace you with a contractor who doesn't think he's a f@ck!n9 Rock Star, mister ""let's take our time and do it right!!"" But I could not imagine doing any other kind of work. I love writing code and hacking business logic. This shit is fun. It's like a RTS where I need to defeat the bugs by using mad logic and clever skills. Someone in real-life told me that want to be a computer programmer because it pays well and seems like a lot of fun. :\ Fail.

    --
    I like-a do-the cha-cha.
  160. When you're new in the biz, it IS boring. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not only because the "good" jobs are taken. Let's be honest here, where do you start in IT usually, unless you're the one-in-a-million exception? You start in some application cranking business. Personally, I could think of little that's less interesting than writing database apps with RAD tools or cranking out PHP scripts.

    But that's where you start. And that's what young people get to hear about when they talk with their peers that have IT careers. They talk with database drones and script monkeys.

    Now, don't get me wrong, there are really cool jobs in either area, but you don't get them without experience. There are interesting jobs in those areas, designing databases, optimizing them, writing the perfect script, fast and efficient, but ... well, I guess it's interesting for geeks but not people who don't have a little orgasm when their script runs 2% faster...

    But usually you get to the more interesting parts (even if only interesting by geek standards) with experience. You won't get hired straight from college to write the game engine for an A grade game, design the next database for Google or write a kernel for the next gen cells (ok, I know someone who was, but he's certainly an exception. In more than one way).

    But if you're not willing to put up with the work necessary to get there, you won't get there, and it won't stop being boring. But ... I dunno, I'd guess it's the same for pretty much every job.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  161. PR Problem, not Directly IT by chiger_bite · · Score: 1

    Most Universities encourage their grads to go work for large companies. This is usually due to the prestige of saying 'we have grads working for XYZ big company' and hoping that the company will donate money. This isn't the best working environment for everyone.

    I had the opportunity to 'grow' with a budding IT department. The department went from a small/medium size department with no budget (read: we couldn't afford to buy jack) to a medium/large size department with a fairly substantial budget.

    There was a major shift in operations as the department grew. The larger the department, the more 'off the shelf' software and outsourcing. This meant less creativity and more monotony for the IT staff.

    It was a blast when I first started working there... always having to find some creative way to make something work the way our customers wanted it to. Now, the same positions entail little more than making sure servers and applications are running.... and if development work is needed, they outsource it.

    I left and went to work for a small/medium sized IT department somewhere else and love what I do once again.

    In my opinion, there is too much emphasis by the Universities to find employment at large businesses.

  162. They Don't Know by TillmanIS2 · · Score: 1

    I think that the major issue with new grads are that they really don't know how big of an umbrella the term "IT" really is. They don't know how many different specialties there are. There are so many different fields of expertise in IT that it take a lifetime to list. Just of the top my head I can think of Security, Networking, Web Dev, Programming and so on. It's sort of like the medical field. There are literally as many different types of doctors as there are bones in your body. Of course you would think IT is boring if all you think of is Help Desk Support. It's up to the individual to make a niche for themselves and find a specialty within IT that exciting to them.

  163. That's great news!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it means even more job security for me!!!

  164. Not boring...Not satisfying or lasting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many young adults starting and or finishing college now have grown up with computers in the house. Many also have a parent that is a IT professional. Or they know one of their friends whose parents are. Do you think they want to end up like them?

    I have told my daughter that my in my job I do high stress work, on call 24x7x365 with work that is like repeatedly herding a new group of cats as new programmers managers come year after year with bad habits and leave with bad habits. Work I did sometimes a year ago is gone. Same mistakes, same assumptions over and over and over again.

    Management has tried to make my job into a "follow the recipe any one can do it" in an attempt to render the cost associated with training and retention obsolete like the application everyone "had" to have yesterday.

    And worse yet is not being thanked nearly enough. It is always more about what you did wrong to remember for next time. Than how you took users from having ZERO access to ANY data to having live data delivered 24x7 on a silver platter.

    Or how about trying to talk to managers, users, programmers about WHY what they want is not simply point and click: "next, next, next and finish." The eyes glaze over and they simply don't want to hear it. They justify spending all that money for 300 page reports that they take the top page off and throw the rest away.

    It is no wonder young people do not want to do IT work.

    IT SUCKS MOST OF THE TIME!

    But with all that many of us would not give it up for anything. I guess we really do have issues collectively to enter into this career.
    I never really planned to be doing what I do. It just happened. So I buck up, slap the headphones on and build another database.

    IT ruined my life, and made it better. Does that make sense?

  165. Still need to eat and sleep! by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.
    I think you mean pay people as much to do them. No matter how exciting and fulfilling a job is you still need to be able to afford food and shelter for you and your family at a bare minimum.
  166. What about outsourcing ? by steverar · · Score: 1

    If you pay attention to the "media", why go to IT in the US when your job will be outsourced or taken by a foreign contractor. Microsoft would much rather have H1-B, offshore, etc then paying for US grads. The kicker is that they're an American company. And MSFT is the only computer company that matters. yea, there's bitterness

  167. I work in IT by Abattoir · · Score: 1

    I am a Linux/Unix system administrator, and have been for almost 10 years. I absolutely love what I do on a regular basis. Sure it can be frustrating at times, but so is every other job. Some aspects may be considered 'boring', but really that is personal perception. I find my work to be personally rewarding and interesting. No, it isn't for everyone, but then again, not every job is meant to be filled by just anyone. Not everyone wants to be an accountant, a lawyer, a pilot or a machine gunner. Not everyone needs to be a system administrator, a security consultant, or a software developer. That's fine. It is far more important for people to find what they love to do and make that their career.

  168. Having kids by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    I may be rationalizing, or remembering the kidless past as worse than it was. But you may also be rationalizing your decision not to have kids. In either case it's an enormous decision with huge effects on your life.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:Having kids by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between parents believing that their lives are better with kids than non-parents believing that their lives are better without them; the parents have experienced both, the non-parents haven't.

      However, the other side of the coin is that parents have more potential reason to rationalize their decision compared to non-parents. For a non-parent to regret not having children, it takes the form of "Gee, I wonder if my life wouldn't have been better if I had kids." But if the parent has any regrets about having children, that inevitably takes the form "Gee, little Timmy ruined everything." It's harder to "go there" in the latter case.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    2. Re:Having kids by cabazorro · · Score: 1

      Well, my basement is a chaotic mosaic of toys, old pc's and cat 5 cables. I'm trying to re-launch the vpnc on my fedora 8 server while the kids throw at each other scratched CD's as frees bees. "Time to go to bed" I yell! They all shout back: "Why?" and I reply: "Because early to bed, early to rise, makes you healthy, wealthy and wise" My 10 yr daughter looks around at the mayhem of cables and switches, sktateboards and legos and snaps: "Dad, does this looks wise to you?"

      --
      - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  169. "Where there's muck there's brass" by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Old saying which still holds true. Emptying septic tanks is not a glamorous job, but the pay is really good.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:"Where there's muck there's brass" by Bandman · · Score: 1

      Apropos, but I dig your username :-)

  170. From the horse's mouth by bkgood · · Score: 1

    As an undergrad working in IT as a student job, I can confirm that it is, in fact, boring. Infinitely more boring and less enjoyable than the other part-time jobs I've worked including apartment cleaning, table waiting, bussing and food delivery. At least I didn't have to deal with 5 30 ton A/C units constantly whirring in the background at the restaurant. Oh, and my coworkers had more depth in both jobs than comic book movies and WoW.

  171. Formalization the Boring Factor by tarsi210 · · Score: 1

    Most of IT, good IT, has been rendered boring by the application of structure and formalization to it. Back in the day, IT folks were seat-of-the-pants, contriving solutions on the fly, hacking live systems, being the hero in the closet that saved the day. Once IT became supremely important to the enterprise, it got controlled, structured, and rules came out. Standards and methodologies started controlling everything from server deployment to code writing. The job went from keyboard slinging console cowboys to geeks in a meeting room constructing project plans.

    This is not to say that the IT that is performed these days isn't GOOD -- it is, far, far better than much of the code and product produced in the halcyon days of the industry. But it lacks the excitement, uncertainty, and massive heroics of yesteryear. This, more than anything, is what has rendered IT "boring" to most grads.

    The excitement comes now from doing a job well, from taking the requirements and still coming up with the creative answers within the frameworks defined, and saving the day by knowing that niche information at the critical time. But gone are the days of a geek-in-a-corner, whacking out miracles and clobbering something together out of voodoo magic to the saviour of all.

  172. News to me by bijanbwb · · Score: 1

    There are two mistakes with the post. One is that it is labeled "News." And the other is that the actual content isn't necessarily true. I am a recent grad and I am don't find my new IT job to be "boring." Subjective thoughts aren't news.

  173. Serves them right... by 5of0 · · Score: 1

    Same here. I figure the ones who think it's boring are the vast amount of grads who got into it because it was the cool thing to do, or becuase it pays well. Serves them right, and leaves room for those of us who are actually in the field because we're engineers by nature.

    I'm double-majoring in CS/EE because that's how I work. I just picked up a car with a froze up engine, mostly so I could take it apart, figure out how it works, and put it together, hopefully making it work better and get a working car out of it. That's how I've always worked, that's how I always will work. I have little sympathy for those that don't have that passion, but got in the field for other reasons like money or cool factor.

    Oh, and also...get out of my back yard!

    --
    You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
  174. UID 104583... Where do I start? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd tally up your comment count over the years, but I don't have time to figure out how to weight the average posting rate of 10 sockpuppets.

  175. Computers aren't computers anymore by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Reading the comments here and pondering the article I was thinking about my own relation to IT. Yes, it has gotten tedious. But that could be the Baskin Robins effect kicking in after 8 years of professional web work. What was bright and flashy and avantgarde back then is a comodity today.

    But that's not all what's to this issue. A big point today is that computers are rarely used for computing nowadays. They are communication devices, surrogates for books/libraries and data stores. Real computing, as in "Automating specific tasks as to help the people involved along" is only a fraction of the actuall work nowadays. And lets face it, folks, *thats* what makes computers and IT fun. When you acutally speed up the data migration process some secretary has to do from 10 hours per day to 10 seconds per day. You get straight to a *real* problem that *real* people have to go through great pains to get solved, you look at it and you automate the damn thing. Everybodies happy, the secretary gives you a huge hug the boss loves you and you take home a decent paycheck and feel great. ... When was the last time that happend?

    Today we have huge application stacks and have to build, setup and maintain massive pipelines for software developement and deployment, each element with its own tedious details that all need to be covered, before we even get the end-user connected to the automation process, let alone are able to develop on the damn thing without some bizar bug somewhere deep inside making our life hell.

    I do web-stuff. With the OS, Apache, mod_php, php, MySQL, [Fill in your favourite web framework here], the Browsers, JavaScript, Mail, deployment automation, Devtools, remote debuggers the stack I have to deal with today has a minimum of 7 large layers that are impossible to overlook for a single person. No wonder the job is fucking boring. That's because I am no longer in control all of the time. And no wonder the customers understand less of what I'm doing and no wonder it takes longer and longer to get to the meat of what makes small business ERP worthwhile for all involved.

    *This* is what makes IT boring and tedious for me. I kind of miss the times of the text interface, where GUI desktops where just a fad and you actually felt like having achieved something at the end of the day. It takes much more effort to get that feeling nowadays, and it doesn't allways work. On top of that we have to get used to working in teams. We are slowly but surely leaving the steam age of IT. Jacks of all trades - even in the web business - are quickly going the way of the dodo.

    Just the other day I reviewed a contract where I'm going to drop LAMP/WebFramework/Ajax hodgepodgeing for a pure ActionScript3 focused job. The industries gotten huge, and is moving faster by the day. One-stop universal IT handyman heroes have finally turned into the equivalent of plumbing jobs. All else is professional work, serving professional pipelines. And yes, that means they also are somewhat boring at times. I bet Gutenbergs printing press only was exiting until his assistants where printing number 56 of page 200 of the bible.

    At least we'll stay in business, as I can't see IT growth stopping any time soon. And with the younger ones thinking of IT as boring - all the better.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  176. College = Big Bucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It reminds of scene from the show Spin City. The Mayor was talking about how bad his first job right out of college was and I quote " I don't know how I survived making only $75,000 a year." I think all college grads are made to believe that because you graduate from "blank" University you are something special. Distorted reality is being taught. you soon find out how the real world works and put in your time then if you do it right you can be the big money guy.

  177. Any hope? by dg__83 · · Score: 1

    I'm taking computer science - I love the math, the logic, and the abstract thinking really tough problems require.

    Listening to this, it sounds like the industry side of this is boring crap where you don't apply any of what you learned in school. Is this really accurate, or did a lot of the complainers not really enjoy studying / not good at it?

    Any help would be appreciated - if I have this shit to look forward to then I'm going straight to grad school.

    --
    :)
    1. Re:Any hope? by edraven · · Score: 1

      It depends. Are you smart? Or did you choose a degree path based on expected income? Sounds like you fall into the first camp, so you're pretty safe. There are plenty of tough problem solving positions out there. They're hard to fill because most people are not smart. You may have to work a few jobs before you find the one that fits you, where you're really challenged and appreciated.
      BTW, most of what you learned in school is at least 5 years old, which means get ready to throw it out and learn how to do this stuff all over again. Just sayin'.

    2. Re:Any hope? by dg__83 · · Score: 1

      "It depends. Are you smart? Or did you choose a degree path based on expected income? Sounds like you fall into the first camp, so you're pretty safe. There are plenty of tough problem solving positions out there. They're hard to fill because most people are not smart. You may have to work a few jobs before you find the one that fits you, where you're really challenged and appreciated.
      BTW, most of what you learned in school is at least 5 years old, which means get ready to throw it out and learn how to do this stuff all over again. Just sayin'."</i>

      I already graduated with a finance degree and was working in that capacity for a couple years, planning to pursue a professional career. The opportunity cost of not working while in school again, paying for school, and having to start at the bottom again when I come out probably works out to >$200k, so no, not in it for the money.

      I just have an extremely small amount of patience for the shitheads who pepper their speech with corporate buzzwords (the crap they teach in business school) thinking it will compensate for mediocre intelligence. Though given the crap I see/hear about at big companies, perhaps they are right. In any case, I like to think, I like science, and I don't like stupid people so big corp business job isn't for me.

      --
      :)
    3. Re:Any hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, unfortunately IT at large corporations is not particularly insulated from the corporate mindset. Though that varies from one company to another, of course. The thing about big companies is that they survive mainly on momentum. So yeah, a lot of stupidity goes on inside of them that just gets swallowed up in the immensity.
      My advice is pay a lot of attention during the interview process. If you get a snake-oil kind of feeling from the people you're talking to, you may want to think about walking away.
      But like a lot of things, there's a fair amount of compromise going on. You're a smart person and you've invested a lot of time, effort, and energy (not to mention money) developing the skills you have. You deserve compensation for that. Unfortunately, anywhere there's compensation to be had, you're going to have to deal with a certain amount of the kind of crap that sticks to money.

  178. Vocational Guidance Counselor by edraven · · Score: 1

    I can't help it, this article reminds me of the Monty Python sketch where the certified public accountant wants to become a lion tamer.
    Dude, if you spent the last four years of your life qualifying to work in an industry you now consider too boring to consider... Look, I got no sympathy.

    1. Re:Vocational Guidance Counselor by edraven · · Score: 1

      Okay, I apologize for not reading the article first. I read the summary to imply that graduates with good prospects for IT positions were avoiding the field, not that non-IT graduates thought IT would be boring. So people who don't study IT think IT is not worth studying? Isn't this a tautology? Nothing to see here, move along.

  179. command line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe I.T. jobs looks boring for that "grads" because of the fact that I.T. its no only "MAC OS BEATIFUL GUI", also is to get the hands dirty and use the command line in the most of the cases.

  180. Biological imperatives by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    If your biological imperatives told you to have sex in order to have children, would you do it? If you had lived a hundred years ago, when contraception was difficult and uncomfortable, would you have chosen celibacy?

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  181. Kids and personal finances by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    A lot of the people I grew up with now have kids, and they all think their kids are the best thing ever to happen to them. Even those whose personal finances are going thru some rough times.

    Kids are expensive. But the standard of living, the stuff you can buy, isn't the most important thing in life. At least, not in most people's lives.

    If you have an SO, for how much would you sell him/her? Unless you have a figure in mind, you don't think that standard of living is the most important thing either.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
  182. It's the money, stupid by Venik · · Score: 1

    There are no boring jobs, just underpaid workers. Another problem is all the poorly trained Indian IT "professionals". I have nothing against Indians, other than majority of their computer guys suck ass. They work for peanuts, drive the wages down across the entire industry, and on the average do a lousy job. I know many here don't want to bring up this subject so not to offend anyone, but most of you know exactly what I am talking about.

    1. Re:It's the money, stupid by xmvince · · Score: 1

      Yep, well said. At least they can't really outsource network administration (ex: the network goes down and can't remotely connect).

  183. Sys admin is far more cut-throat that it was... by rathaven · · Score: 1


    I've always had the opinion that IT should include as little clerical work as possible that cannot be automated. Therefore I've spent almost as much of my time writing scripts and programs to take data I know is in existence and putting it in lots of clerical reports over time as I have manually writing them. I mean, I do other things as well but if I didn't handle the reporting side automatically (for the most part) I'd have given up and left too.

    However, to me, its this kind of thing that makes IT interesting - the ability to turn around the facts and figures, massaged and ready whenever some boss or other who doesn't understand IT for anything other than Excel comes along - more quickly than they would expect. The problem is to keep managers who know nothing out of the data - except maybe the odd reporting table and you are winning. Back who I started my first programming job this was easy - they didn't know what things were capable of and with a few reusable databases we could show them. Nowadays its a cat fight with every third party vendor to keep the automation we have and with every dumb know it all manager to stop them changing to systems that won't work.

    Unfortunately manipulating the organisation into a way of working that allows data to be reused is half the battle in IT. The systems and services we run are largely about this - creating, storing, protecting and making the data as reusable as possible. If you see a system that does nothing to help - dump it! If one takes too long to develop - dump it! If one stores the data in a proprietary and incompatible manner when it doesn't need to - dump it!

    IT is no longer a place to sit back - its getting quite as cut-throat as many boardrooms as we are effectively competing with a plethora of third party vendors. In this climate I can see why people want to leave, however, I quite enjoy it.

  184. no. by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    Nerdy? Jesus christ someone is so obviously sucked in to Apple's advertising it's not even funny. Maybe it's because the media gives it a bad name. We've been nerds for a long time and I would hope that any student with an ambition of getting a bachelors or a masters degree in anything computer related would be a nerd. and proud of it too.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  185. Shipping software changes a place. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Suddenly your not just a cost anymore.

    Getting the first version out the door is often very painful.

    I wouldn't do that again. (Taking an internal project 'commercial'. Just start over using the internal project as a working prototype and building a new team, perhaps with key members of the old one as a skeleton. If you don't get support for that walk^m^m^m^mrun away.)

    Much easier to just start with a place that has software development expertise up the management chain.

    I've been both places and even though generating revenue will change the level of respect an internal development team gets, it won't really change much.

    With an IT carrier you will pretty much always be a cost. (Excepting IT contract shops, where you will be livestock to be traded.)

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  186. Everything is boring if you want it to be... by jvin248 · · Score: 1

    If you're stuck in a big company job driving you nuts with boredom... look for a small company that needs help. The small company relies on each person to do the work of twenty - often twenty different types of work (sales, engineering, quality, shipping). Big companies have enough people to redundantly slice up any one job across twenty people. So it's very boring and very quickly and fraught with lots of politics (boredom begets politics - no other way to spice up the day).

    Or start a business in your field in your spare time (at home or while surfing at work, it seems). Then you're the one person creating the whole business. When you're successful you can then hire a few people to do the drudge work. With a bit more success you are suddenly a CEO getting 10-100x the pay for not doing anything. But you created a business that employs hundreds of people. (different issues if it's an inherited CEO position by a "professional manager").

    Rather than staying bored, look for alternatives. Downsize your lifestyle so you're not a slave to the credit card or mortgage and take a few more chances. Your largest liability is being bored in a job where you are not growing professionally, nor caring to do differently.

    Dream up a money saving project that can turn around your company, or double sales, and try implementing it (you'll need to work through all the other bored workers and their "nope won't work here"/"tried that two years ago"/"Joe didn't like that the last time someone suggested it"/etc.

    Work is only as boring and lifeless as you wish to make it. "Just whistle while you work"..those darn seven dwarves.

  187. If you don't know before you even reach college... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't know that you want to work in IT before you even begin college, then you certainly as hell should stay the hell away from IT. The one thing I cannot stand is seeing people get hired to do a job that they learned from a textbook rather than through personal desire. To anyone that thinks the job is boring, it is, stay away. It's just one big nerd fest. Greasy skin, greasy hair, greasy food, and 7-1/2 hours a day of bitching on message boards with 1/2 an hour of actual work.

  188. I don't think it involved nerdiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't say that the educational system helps people expect anything more interesting or fun in IT. Especially if you get involved in the field directly or just do tech related stuff on your own first. I've been working in IT for six years now (four when I started college) and decided not to get my degree in anything CS-related because the classes were painfully boring...

  189. Re:I, for one, welcome our new whiny bratty overlo by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    That's funny. I live in the Albany area and I've never even heard of "the Masie Center". The top employer of tech-savvy folks in our area is RPI.

  190. The real reson for high CEO pay by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

    The CEOs are paid a lot because they know where the bodies are buried.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  191. That's awesome. by melted · · Score: 1

    I like my six figure salary very much, and I want it to keep up with inflation.

  192. TPS Reports!! by bustergonad · · Score: 0

    hmm lets see,..spend 4 years getting a comp sci degree,..then spend X number of years watching your skills wane as you spend all your productive time managing TPS reports for the 7 managers that you are "dotted-line" to. Then once you get savvy enough with said TPS reports and mindless meetings, the dept decides "to go a whole new direction" which basically means your job has been outsourced to India,..(usually timed right after you sign a mortgage and new car loan).

  193. I find programming fun and interesting... by Daimaou · · Score: 1

    ...but it sucks as a career because of all the life-sucking project manager parasites who leech money off the company by exploiting your talents.

  194. The reason why by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    Is this because of the fact that Bill Gates has made the whole industry look nerdy? No, it's because they've heard all the horror stories IT admins have been telling for years about being undervalued and ignored by management, being driven crazy by dumb users, and meaningless but required certifications and training courses. IT basically sounds like a difficult, thankless, mind-numbing job, so why would anyone want it?

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  195. It depends on your outlook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the opportunity of 'driving' the Australia Telescope Array (five radiotelescopes that are linked).

    I ran it one morning from 12AM 'till 6AM. We were specifically looking for signs of alcahol in interstellar space but the data was also just a standard observation run.

    It consisted of calibrating the array, pointing at the target area, recalibrating the array, pointing at the target area..... ad nauseum.

    I thought it was exhilarating but I could see if I did it for more than that one run, it would soon become boring.

    I work in IT and although it is sometimes boring, development & support are more interesting that the many other jobs I have done.

    Also, loved the idea of an accountant thinking IT is boring. Sooo Python!

  196. not just at work though by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

    Many projects are mundane, but I love doing creative personal projects. That's where the fun is.

    For instance, my latest site has all kinds of crazy comparisons. A new one I'm working on now involves sneeze propulsion. In order to do it I need to figure out how much force is in a sneeze.

    To figure that out I'm going to put a ping pong ball into a tube then videotape myself sneezing into the tube. Using the video I'll be able to figure out how fast the ball comes out and from there I'll calculate the force of the sneeze.

    In order to make the site I get to dabble in all kinds of technologies.

    Some people say that getting paid for doing a hobby will suck all the fun out of it. I don't think that's true. It may not be as fun at work as it is at home, but all that time at work results in refined abilities that can make home projects even more fun.

    The key is to not let work limit what you do with your skills.

  197. It is because they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maintenance is technically challenging and sometimes fun. But it is really just maintenance. Architectural design at best. User support blows any way you slice it.

    I hate being in IT, I only stay because I get to be a developer on occasion, it pays the bills, and I haven't finished school yet.

    Give me a job where I don't have to use off the shelf equipment, can do some R&D, and have a very, very small chance of getting paged in the middle of the night by a dead server/switch/router/user.

    f that in the a.

  198. I'd expect the opposite by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    > Surely with so many (especially young) people being 'web first' with not
    > just their buying habits, but now in terms of what they do in their spare
    > time, we'd expect more of them to want to get a career in it?

    No, I would expect the exact opposite. What is exiting about something so commonplace in your lifestyle as the Web?

    With the McDonaldization/"process standardization" of software development, it IS boring. Every kid has seen Office Space, and the real joke is that the movie's pretty realistic.

    That's not to say that there aren't exciting jobs out there in IT, but unfortunately they are the minority.

  199. In Related News... by ponraul · · Score: 1

    New grads shun work as "boring."

    However, the study make the situation appear worse than it is as they selected all of the "non-computing" for the survey; all the people, who might be predisposed to thinking that computing is not boring, were removed from the sampling pool.

    Given a random profession, outside of jobs that fall under the category of adolescent dream (e.g., astronaut, football player or treasure hunter), most day-jobs and careers shall seem boring.

  200. SPENGLER'S SLACKERS. Are you one? by aqk · · Score: 1

    Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:17 AM
    My latest submission to slashdot.
    No doubt it will be rejected.... LOL!

    Slashdot Story Submissions
    Preview Submission

    SPENGLER'S SLACKERS. Are you one? Enlightenment
    aqk writes -Young American slashdotter! Are you possibly one of Spengler's Slackers ?
    This modern-day journalist descendant of Oswald Spengler has almost as much a dark vision of Western Society (i.e. the USA) as the philosopher.
    To wit: "America might be the first country in recorded history whose culture celebrates not only indolence but also the sheer absence of ability. Byronic loafing is the birthright of genius, but slacking has become the entitlement of every young American.

    Huh. You're comfortably ensconced in your parents' basement, penning arguments on your Ubuntu system to slashdot, on why "XP is sooo much better than Vista".
    Maybe you're the beer-swilling undergrad in his fully-paid-for dorm using your Macintosh to rant about how you'll replace all those Windows systems, when (and if) you join the business world?

    Nevertheless, Spengler ( a scribe for The Asia Times â" yes, another offshore corporation) may have given you some kind of wake-up call. Perhaps you should take note. Do you agree with the above SLACKER article? Indeed: where is the USA going?


  201. Only boring people get bored by rajafarian · · Score: 1

    As Tool sings:

    Boredom's not a burden anyone should bear.

    What a shame...

  202. User != developer by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    Using the web is very different from developing a web app.

    The industry is nerdy because it must be. This is an industry with its fundamental technical roots in math, physics, and logic. Its less-nerdy side is still considerably nerdier than average. Project management, for example, involves explaining nerdy concepts to (potentially) non-nerds, and using nerdy subjects like economics to try to keep projects on-track and/or invent jargon to make CxOs feel like they're part of the "in" crowd.

    Non-nerds need not apply; non-nerds have political "science", journalism, sociology, business, and other such areas to occupy.

  203. Good with computer != go into IT by eyal0 · · Score: 1

    Who the hell wants to be in IT anyway? When I think of IT, I often think of the guy that played a lot of video games when he was younger, so he liked computers, but didn't quite get the push into programming/engineering. So he spent his teens reconfiguring the computer and the modem for a few hours and now he's made a career out of it as sysadmin. On the other hand, you've got the guys that spent their teens soldering BJTs or writing open source code into project that span months. Those guys go on to be engineers.

    The engineers make more money and have more fun. It's a rare company where the guy making the product is getting paid less or doing less interesting work than the guy supporting him. The closer you are to being the guy that generates revenue, the more respect that you'll command. And respect in the industry lets you demand a more interesting job.

  204. Making software visible ... by golodh · · Score: 1
    Well ... I'm afraid that only applies to an extremely limited subset of all software written.

    Can you imagine a demonstration of a payslip program on a website? Do you think the com[any you made it for would think it a good idea? Would it allocate resources to it? Would it allow you to hook up a live version of this program (even on a dummy dataset) to a website in your spare time? I don't. And I'm afraid the same holds for all administrative software. Or inventory management software. Or any other custom software.

    The only type of software I can imagine being showcased in this manner is scientific software, or screen-shots of software your company wants to showcase for some reason (potential sales, PR).

    But perhaps I'm too pessimistic. Some companies allow part of their in-house software to be open-sourced. Then they will actually want people to know about it, and you have a lot more freedom to show it off.

    1. Re:Making software visible ... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine a demonstration of a payslip program on a website? Well, yes, I can. Don't see any on Google, but it's not magical. You can describe a lot with screenshots of the program in action and of course, download the program from your website.
  205. Re: Glad it worked out for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When outsourcing killed my consulting company, we lost the house, tech bubble took the retirement, wife committed suicide and left me with mega debt and bankruptcy. Physical disability occurred and now I am over 50, unemployed possibly unemployable. I hate Microsoft and the Windows operating system and Windows software development, the Windows API, MFC, OLE, Active X, Internet Explorer, and Visual Studio. The corporate interests are busy trying to put the modern information worker back into a box so they can be put back into the factory and not represented by a union. What once looked like a real profession has turned into a dismal, boring, unsatisfying melange of CERT notifications and struggle between corporate America that doesn't want to pay for engineering and the young people who don't want to pay for anything, music, software or dues. Just what does the IT worker have to look foreward to in these days of accelerated computer reality where you cannot get enough education to keep up with the latest technologies because those in charge want teams to do the works, not stars. No more stars. Just underpaid teams of unimaginative drones manufacturing software and reconfiguring web servers over and over and over. Tuning firewalls against the same old and every day's new boring new/old Internet attacks. Just what is there in life that makes it worthwhile to do what it takes to master all this chaos for the small reward that they have planned for people in this line of work. Bah humbug.

  206. They don't pay us enough to be bored by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    If jobs were very exciting and fulfilling in and of themselves, we wouldn't need to pay people to do them.

    Life requires labor. Civilized life requires even more labor. Most of that labor is unpleasant in some way. We face the grind anyway, day after day, because it keeps the ball rolling, and because it gives us the money we need to do the things we actually like doing.

    Very true. And if graduates are choosing jobs other than in IT, despite their expertise, then presumably it is because industry isn't paying enough. Double the salaries offered and see how many of those graduates you attract. Eventually, if the pay is good enough, people will condescend to doing those "boring" jobs.

    As things stand, IT is woefully underpaid in comparison to those MBA and middle-management hacks who bring a lot less value to the enterprise and earn a great deal more. Perhaps today's graduates recognize this, and figure if they're going to be underpaid, why not be underpaid to do something you find fulfilling instead?

    Seems like they're arguably smarter than we were when we received our BS and MS degrees.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  207. Boring is GOOD in IT by doomicon · · Score: 1

    Boring means it is running, it means everything is in place the correct way. Monitoring is working, everything is running smoothly and you just wait for the sms or green light to turn red. Gives you free time to work on interesting/fun things :-)

    Exciting IT is supporting an environment that is an absolute mess! It's rebuilding zones in production, because someone didn't create the zfs mounts/quotas, it's creating a server list because your department doesn't have one and no clue on how many or what it supports, it's installing sudo on 156 servers, building ldap, it's going crazy over the RH7.2 box that has open public key access to over 40 production servers... AHHHH! ... boring is good in IT.

    --

    Awesome!
  208. Real life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work is boring. That is why it's called 'work'.

    Unless you have someone supporting you or are independently wealthy you will need an income.

    IT provides good opportunities for employment with much better then average income potential in a safe environment.

    When you need a little perspective, spend a week or two digging ditches or carrying sacks of cement in all kinds of weather for a lot less money.

  209. System maintenance vs. farming by qbzzt · · Score: 1

    If you truly believe farming is better, what are you doing in system maintenance? Farming jobs are still out there. They are difficult and require a lot of manual labor, but a lot less than they used to.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:System maintenance vs. farming by stevie.f · · Score: 1

      Can't afford it at the moment. This actually pays much better.

      This is the first sit down job I've ever had, I've done a little work as a laborer and also factory work (assembly line stuff). Unfortunately it is minimum wage work but I find it immensely rewarding. At the end of the day I can step back and think 'I did that' and actually have something to see for my actions.

      Here I can work for 40 hours a week and earn more than when I was working 55. If it wasn't for the money, I would be doing some kind of physical labor.

      For me, the money wins out at the moment. Good question though

    2. Re:System maintenance vs. farming by qbzzt · · Score: 1

      I see your point. The farming job might be better while you're working, but the entire package is better with system maintenance. You get money to do more fun stuff outside of work.

      Maybe you should take the 15 extra work hours and create something with them.

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
  210. Huh? by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    I guess you and I have different definitions of "fulfilling". I find raising my kids fulfilling, yet they don't provide me with any food or lodging.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only find raising your kids fulfilling because your basic needs are met. If you need a job to have these, a job that does not allow you to meet these necessities will never be fulfilling.

  211. Boring? I think they have things mixed up.. by xmvince · · Score: 1

    If boring means that no one tells you what to do, then I'm all for it. I love being my own boss as an IT admin. No one watching me, no BS assignments, I decide what happens on my network and all the people using it are my n00bs. It's like a game, defend your network and take care of your army. People that get bored easily are n00bs at life. Everything is mystifying and magnificent if you look at it a certain way, you just need to have that open mind and a positive outlook and TADA, life is great.

  212. Why not have it all? by cavis · · Score: 1
    I've worked in IT for 15 years now, and I've work in a variety of capacities (local support, help desk, security, graphics and web design, purchasing, and network monitoring). At no time did I ever find my work rewarding or fulfilling, but I never expected it to. The pay is fair, and it supports my household.

    However, it is my work away from the office that is rewarding. I've been a volunteer fireman for 17 years (now a Captain), an EMT for 14 years, I'm a Little League manager and a board member, a midget-league football coach, a father of two young sons, and I have a Harley for those in-between times. I could write a book about what all those things mean to me, about the kids I've mentored, the lives and property I've saved, and the good/bad times I've had. I'm 37 years old and none of those things are going to end anytime soon.

    Today's young people want (no, they expect) immediate rewards for their work, no matter what it is. That can be in the form of money or in kudos, but they want the feedback. Is that the result of parenting, or the result of technology. Do you remember the days of having to do research in a library with physical pieces of paper in real books? Now days, you just go to Google and find all you need. Immediate rewards to your needs, right?

    Why can't today's kids find their satisfaction outside the workplace? It's because they don't look.

  213. Boring is OK with me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It 12:30 am. I just spent 5.5 hours in a 95 degree closet upgrading a phone system that should have taken 1 hour to do. I was working with 1 guy remotely in Atlanta, who was also working with the phone company to troubleshoot the T1 line. I was there onsite to reseat the CSU/DSU card and dial phone numbers. Boring ? Yes. But it pays well. I'm glad people are getting out of I.T. I remember when there weren't a lot of people in I.T. and it was more fun then, and more profitable. Every swingin d*ck in the world is in I.T. these days. It's time to separate the wheat from the chaff.. or whatever the saying goes. If you are going to be in I.T. , you better like being paid O.K. money to be treated like shit and you better be damn good at what you do or you will be replaced. It's freakin brutal. What I did tonight was actually cake work. I didn't even have to use my brain. I'd do it 10 hours a day if I could but it ain't that easy to come by.

  214. Do you go looking for IT jobs? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    I don't. IT has come to mean computer network administration and operation...glorified backup tape switchers for lack of a better description.

    But then again I worked for medium sized businesses long enough that I got my fill of keeping networks running (had an IT hat). Boring, tedious and easy. RTFM, work, cash check, repeat.

    I'm proud to work with computers. I wouldn't want to be grouped with most of the 'IT' people I've known.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'