Slashdot Mirror


What Did You Do First With Linux?

ruphus13 writes "OStatic has an interesting article on remembering the first time you used Linux. Quoting: 'I'm not sure if the admission that I remember my first Linux installation much more clearly than any date with my first boyfriend or my first date with my husband is a really wise thing to put in writing. I will freely admit it wasn't quite as anxiety-inducing as a date, and the long-term relationship that sprang from it taught me quite a bit about myself, how I learn, and how to passionately load kernel modules at boot. So, what was your first Linux experience?'"

739 comments

  1. First time? by dov_0 · · Score: 1

    Just hunted around. I was trying out different distros.

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    1. Re:First time? by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      I should mention that the first uneasy but hopeful meeting turned into a long-term relationship and eventually a business.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    2. Re:First time? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      I hear that these days most marriages usually end up in businesses too; divorce attorneys' businesses.

      --
      I hate printers.
    3. Re:First time? by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      I first downloaded the installer for RedHat....4ish?

      It crashed on my computer. Downloaded it again, and same thing.

      Then I downloaded the 14 5 1/4 install disks for Debian 2.2 over dialup. Took a couple of overnights...

      And the rest is history. Not very interesting history, but....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    4. Re:First time? by u38cg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unusual. In this thread, /.ers compete with each other to try and be the earliest to use Linux. Where's Linus when you need him?

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:First time? by xSauronx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I dont remember the first distro i tried, but it was 1997 or 1998. I did the install over my windows install and...when i realized it was ugly, going to be a bitch to do anything, and i couldnt get a dial up connection working easily, i reinstalled windows.

      I started using debian for toying around with 3 or 4 years ago or so, and I use ubuntu on the desktop for the last 2 years now. I way, way prefer linux over windows, primarily due to software management and interface options.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    6. Re:First time? by neomunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I first installed an early version of slackware, back in 95 or so. I don't quite remember how many floppies it was, but a couple friends and I were able to split the downloads up between us. One boot floppy, one root floppy and a significant number of installation floppies (that we soon learned to copy to the HD before installing). We got this through a hole in the state library system's gopher access number.

      I spent a large number of sleepless nights chatting on the 50 person(!) BBSs, facinated by the ability to chat with so many people at once instead of the one or two that I could with the better set-up local dialup BBSs. A little later I learned about ytalk and got to have more "personal" (wink wink, nudge nudge) chats with 1 or 2 people at a time again. :-D

      Eventually, I met my wife on the Illinois Institute of Technology computer club's BBS, shadow. Yep, that annoying sound a modem makes was "the handshake o' love" to me.

      Now excuse me while I go see if there are any kids on my lawn.

    7. Re:First time? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      That's like CmdrTaco responding to a lowest UID thread. It's not really fair (though it has happened).

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    8. Re:First time? by steveb3210 · · Score: 1

      I first installed an early version of slackware, back in 95 or so. I don't quite remember how many floppies it was, but a couple friends and I were able to split the downloads up between us. One boot floppy, one root floppy and a significant number of installation floppies (that we soon learned to copy to the HD before installing). We got this through a hole in the state library system's gopher access number.

      I spent a large number of sleepless nights chatting on the 50 person(!) BBSs, facinated by the ability to chat with so many people at once instead of the one or two that I could with the better set-up local dialup BBSs. A little later I learned about ytalk and got to have more "personal" (wink wink, nudge nudge) chats with 1 or 2 people at a time again. :-D

      Eventually, I met my wife on the Illinois Institute of Technology computer club's BBS, shadow. Yep, that annoying sound a modem makes was "the handshake o' love" to me.

      Now excuse me while I go see if there are any kids on my lawn.

      This was right around my first install - you used to have download the slackware disks in series so if you wanted network you got the N disks or the D series of disks for development. @ 9600 baud, downloading and writing like 23 floppies later..

    9. Re:First time? by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't get any prizes for being an early adopter - I argued fervently that FreeBSD (2.2.x) was better, and I had a subscription to get them mailed to me. (Yay Walnut Creek CD-ROM)

      I think I first tried linux in 96/97 via the 'linux' add-in for FreeBSD. Then I tried a full-blown Debian install, and eventually bought the Corel Linux package for my wife.

      SAP released a Linux install for RedHat 6.5 IIRC, which my company installed on my recommendation.
      This led to years and years of professionally supporting Linux, which I continue to do to this day. Right now I support SAP on DB2 and Oracle running on a mix of RHEL 4 and AIX.

      So my first date with Linux was really more of a 'blind date', since I just installed the ports package for it ;)

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    10. Re:First time? by bingbong · · Score: 3, Funny

      I too used the floopies back in 1995. I learned a lot of interesting thing... like you had to manually configure some addressing issues in 'shadow memory' in order to get my token ring card to work.

      I used latex to write my thesis in vi (sorry emacs peoples).

      yep, we had to type uphill both ways in those days. We fought each other with sticks to obtain extra carriage returns.

      --
      "Omnis tuus capsa sunt inesse nos"
    11. Re:First time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Interesting... usually the "handshake o' love" only involves one person...

    12. Re:First time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked at the 20 floppies offered to me by a friend and said, "I'm not installing that!"

      Years later I went to a Linux workshop of a local PCUG, and the presenter didn't show until late. The mouse didn't work on the presentation machine, so I looked up in a Red Hat for dummies how to get it to work. I learned more that night from the troubleshooting, than I learned from the presenter, when he eventually showed up. Even better, I learned that I could troubleshoot Linux.

    13. Re:First time? by Shark · · Score: 1

      Time to start a new one. Incindently, my ID is lower than yours! Nah nah prrrrt!

      --
      Mind the frickin' laser...
    14. Re:First time? by pepax · · Score: 1

      1998 or 1999. I realized the modem didn't work, so I booted into Win95, read about it online, booted linux, tried the suggestions, booted into Win95, read some more, booted into linux, tried it, booted Win95,... for the rest of the day. Then I gave up.

    15. Re:First time? by Malevolyn · · Score: 1

      I was a little nervous, it being my first time an all. But Linux was respectful, gentle, and understanding. We had dinner and a few drinks, then headed to the bedroom. We took it slow at first, but then things really heated up.

      Then I smelled smoke and realized the old, old Quantex machine I was running was about to catch fire.

      --
      Your ad here.
    16. Re:First time? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Before slackware there was SLS (Soft Landing Systems). The sysop of a BBS that I downloaded a bunch of Unix utilities from had offered to copy it onto floppies for you, if you sent him the box of floppies & return postage. Took 15 floppies I believe.

      Before that, I had used what probably can't be called a distribution -- it consisted of a boot floppy, and a root floppy. From there, you could fdisk a partition, and also used DOS debug to modify a particular byte offset on the kernel boot floppy to tell it to load the root filesystem from your hard drive.

    17. Re:First time? by cyberthanasis12 · · Score: 1

      I also started with Slackware, I still have the CD which I bought in (the end of) 1995.
      But the first useful thing I did with Linux was in 1999, when I set up a file server with SAMBA. Until then I used Novell Netware 3.11 which had a limit of 10 clients. I just couldn't believe that with Linux I had unlimited clients for no money at all, which also happened to be faster than Netware.
      I ran SuSE Linux 6.2 on a discarded 1993 computer - 486-66MHz, 16MB RAM, 2GB SCSI hard disk, three 3COM 3C503 LAN cards. Incredible!

    18. Re:First time? by GarryFre · · Score: 1

      I accidentally deleted every file and directory trying to back it up using gZip which unlike zip, DELETES the source tree and files after compressing it into the zip file. Oops!

      --
      www.Migrainesoft.com - Computer giving you a headache? We can fix that!
    19. Re:First time? by metacell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bah, that's nothing!

      I overheard a conversation Linus had at the campus cafeteria back in 1990, when the Linux kernel was just an idea in his head. During the conversation, I wrote down the machine code on a napkin and executed it by hand, using a couple of salt shakers to keep track of the status registers.

      You youngsters think you need a lot of expensive hardware to run software, but let me tell you, back in those days, we learnt to use our heads!

    20. Re:First time? by SEE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, yeah.

    21. Re:First time? by Ruede · · Score: 1

      first thing: using it as a router for my home network... a bit fileserver stuff and then about 1 year later: mldonkey... :D

    22. Re:First time? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      early 1995, Slack 2.1; it was on a nightowl CD I had picked up for my BBS...I still have the CD, and it still worked as of 2 years ago.
      I installed it, IIRC, because I wanted to check out a new Linux BBS package (YA-BBS? can't remember); I was getting irritated with Renegade and fossil drivers.
      I think it took me around 2 weeks to get slack running, working on it around 2-3 hours a night, most of the time spent on Xfree. The BBS software was a bust, but I ended up using the system as a print/FAX server for about 6 months; I had an ancient panasonic 24 pin printer that LOVED slack, for some reason it went to town on elaborate fonts, it was turning out prints indistinguishable from a laser printer (yes, I know thats impossible).
      I stuck with Solaris, HP-UX & Xenix (yark) after that, until I got interested in something I had read about Mandrake, around v.8 I think; Since then I've always had at least 1 Debian system doing something. When it gets to the point that I can't make Win2k do what I want I'll probably fully convert.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    23. Re:First time? by GreatDrok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Neomonk said "I first installed an early version of slackware, back in 95 or so. I don't quite remember how many floppies it was"

      I installed about the same time. It was 40 floppies for a full install. I downloaded them from sunsite onto my SPARCStation at work which fortunately had a floppy drive. dd them onto the floppies and then off home with them.

      The install was based on the 1.0 kernel and I was putting it on because I had been working on some code on my SPARC and the SGI Indigo we had in the lab and wanted to compile it on a 486DX33 PC I had at home. Unfortunately, the machine was running Windows 3.1 and the Microsoft C compiler I had simply didn't want to compile the code. That and the lack of any decent network capabilities made me look at Linux. It took a couple of goes but I got the machine up and was able to get X going in 1024x768 interlaced mode. Compiled my code and it was good.

      I used the machine to develop new software I intended to run on bigger machines, plus I wrote my PhD thesis using LaTeX since I was able to get the entire text 10x over on a single floppy so I could carry the disc to the office and keep a backup on two different sites. Shortly I upgraded the HD to 200MB, found some more RAM to get it up to 20MB from the original 8, added a 14.4 modem, Sound Blaster card and CD-ROM and it was really going somewhere.

      Amazing how much power that little machine gave me.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    24. Re:First time? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The 'linux' port/package for FreeBSD is quite appallingly named, since, although it contains a lot of GNU code and various other bits, the one thing that it doesn't contain is Linux.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    25. Re:First time? by budgenator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I guess you never heard of a circle jerk then!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    26. Re:First time? by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 1

      You got me beat by a year. I used the Slackware CD in 1996, on my shiny new 166 MHz Pentium with a whopping 32M of memory, and ended up staying up all night fighting with video front/back porch timings in XF86Config after I'd gotten over being scared by the dire warning that it would destroy my monitor if I got it wrong. I would go chase the kids off my lawn now, except I was 13 at the time, so I'm not quite old enough for that yet. :)

    27. Re:First time? by mightyQuin · · Score: 1

      killall with no commands line parms is also kind of nasty.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got some idea balls to remove from a manatee tank.
    28. Re:First time? by Skrynesaver · · Score: 1

      A friend, who subsequently became a Debian maintainer, arrived over to me with probably the same 2 disk distribution I had a kernel, a shell, a compiler and vi. After that it was roll your own. At the time I was an occasional building laborer, a whole new world became available to me, though I had no net access at the time, so we wrote our own tools and games. Since then I've worked as an Apache admin, a mod_perl programmer and currently maintain enterprise Tomcat and C apps on Solaris and RHEL. That first distro gave me the freedom to experiment without the resources of a college or company to pay for the tools. My girlfriend of the time became an ace C++ coder (she remains an intimidatingly smart friend), in fact by introducing us to Linux Al changed all our lives, cheers amck;)

      --
      "Linux is for noobs"-The new MS fud strategy
    29. Re:First time? by DaemonDazz · · Score: 1

      My first was around the end of '98. Looking at the RH release history it was probably late November '98. One of the guys I chatted to on IRC burned me a copy of RH4 on CD but the computer would not read it. I figured the disc was screwy so I went out and bought a retail copy of RH5.2

      At the time I was using NT4 workstation on an old (even then) 486DX2-66 with 4Mb of RAM as a mail server for myself and parents while I was at uni, on a perm dial-up link. It would take 30 seconds to check the POP account over a 10Mb LAN connection, longer if there was actually any mail. After installing RH5.2 on that machine when I checked my mail the dialog box appeared and disappeared faster than I could see it. I had to press send-and-receive a couple of times and send myself an email to believe it had actually done it!

      Needless to say, I haven't use Windows on any server since.

    30. Re:First time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first time was trying to get myth tv installed. Big fail. Tried again when building a new of and I didn't have a legal copy of XP handy and I wanted to burn in the system over a weekend. So never got installed in the end.

    31. Re:First time? by spydum · · Score: 1

      I think my first linux experience was with Slackware as well. Slackware 3.2, Kernel 2.0.28? It was installed a second harddrive still formatted FAT. There was a handy tool that came installed that let you boot straight into Linux from Windows.. but you had to reboot again to get back into Windows. I mostly used the linux side to experiment with compiling and coding.. I later decided the dual-boot thing wasn't worth it, and built a machine frmo spare parts to run Slack 3.2. The box ran for 5 years straight without rebooting, as my primary mail, dns, web and ftp server. I finally shut it down after I moved for the second time (on UPS for the first one, in the back of my trunk), not due to any technical reasons, I just had finally outlived the 486dx4-100/32mb it ran on.

    32. Re:First time? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I logged in.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    33. Re:First time? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I started with Slackware at about the same time. Getting a usable system up and running was easy, but it took me some time to get X11 running. IIRC at the time I had a crappy SiS graphics card, and I never did succeed in getting any better than 16-bit colour out of it. I went through a succession of graphics cards until about 1998 when I got my first Riva TNT card, and that was so good, I've stuck with nVidia ever since. Other people had terrible problems with sound, but that turned out to be relatively straightforward for me...

      It sometimes seems a bit incongruous that Linux still has a reputation in some circles for hardware support (presumably based on early experience) where now it supports just about everything out of the box - something Windows still fails at.

    34. Re:First time? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      My first experience with Linux was also associated with windows. I created a dual boot and basically used Linux to backup windows on the same drive and safe from the various vagrancies and idiosyncrasies of windows. It basically gave me access to all the various windows configs and dlls to fix them easily when windows inevitably crapped out. Of course using that on the desktop (I have continued the practice on all my windows game playing machines since) lead me to make the obviously sensible decisions to shift servers from windows to Linux, after all why bother to dual boot servers, one OS that is secure and stable to fix the other OS which, well, the only real benefit being there is a lot of software that will run on it, so Samba is my other major Linux experience.

      So after running a Linux server for eighteen months my biggest defining experience was, when asked I thought I had only been using it for six months, I had to check the date to find out how long I had actually had it on site, the difference in the admin was that stark.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    35. Re:First time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me 3! Although mine was much more like neomonk's I think..

                  I installed at some point around 1994. Slackware, I didn't have enough floppies, plus the ones I did have kept going bad! So I had root and boot, and like 3 or 4 other floppies (at the best) I would like right a disk or two out, pop em' in, put on the next disks... I cringe when I see a floppy ever since.

                Slack was awesome though. My first box I ran it on was a 386sx-33, with a 40MB RLL hard disk I scrounged off an XT-clone. 4MB of RAM. Fine at a command line. X was pretty bad, but there was just xterm, xeyes, and xclock to use with it anyway so I didn't feel like I was missing out much. Next I had a 486sx-33 with 8MB; to save about $300..seriously.. this had some SIMMVerters so I could reuse my old 30-pin SIMMs. I got a 420MB hard disk. Slack flew on that box, I gave someone an account to run a MUD on there for a little while.. it'd bog a bit in X when they were recompiling the MUD, or had several users on (the most I saw was 5 I think.) I'm sure the link being a modem did not help their speeds either.

                Then Mosaic came out. I think I viewed the entire web with that system and Mosaic.. it was like 50 or so pages back then (NCSA, CERN, a few odd personally-run sites..) Gopher space was actually pretty extensive back then but I never got into it. Although just like neomonk up there, I did also find the gopher server here rather insecure..heh. Netscape 0.9 came out a while later. These really needed more than 8MB to run properly.

                I tried debian at some point here, I got as far as an installer step that asked what packages I wanted, with a list of about 6000 packages, debian potato (2.2). Also an early Redhat, I quit it after the first time I tried to update, there was an RPM upgrade, which they only distributed in the new RPM format. Oops. Back to slackware..

                I had one VESA Local Bus system (which was great until I tried to put in over 8MB, the combo I built put the video card RAM at 12MB! 8-( ). THen AMDs since, a K5-75, K6-2 450, Duron 900 (I have a few Athlon XPs and a Sempron now, with a Celeron-M notebook and a P4-3.0 for good measure.)

                After slackware, I used gentoo, and use Ubuntu. I have 2 gentoo boxes still running, with the rest Ubuntu. My main desktop has gentoo, I got it all tweaked just how I like, the USE flags let me set packages how I like, etc. But Ubuntu's defaults are pretty good in general, it's DEFINITELY slick and easy to use. It brings me new respect for debian, seeing as how Ubuntu's closely derived from debian (I installed straight debian recently in a VM and it's quite nice too.)

                I should try out slackware again...

    36. Re:First time? by StewBaby2005 · · Score: 1

      Installed Slackware 1.2.13 or so, on a 486 with 16M RAM and a 200 M HD and ran a Departmental DNS server and a mail server

    37. Re:First time? by dakohli · · Score: 1
      Walnut Creek....

      I installed slackware 3.5 off the CD in the summer of '98. I had an 486dx-33, it took all night to compile a kernel. I had just become a Unix admin and had a choice between SCO UnixWare or Linux. The choice was easy. I had the Queue Linux Bible, and was able to write the scripts for the external modem, and within the week I had not only a graphic desktop, but internet access as well!

      Within a year I switched to SuSE, stuck with them until fairly recently, when I started to cast around for a new distro.

      For now I settled on Mint. Everything just worked, I still like fiddling, but sometime's its nice that things work out of the box.

      Don't need no silly signature

    38. Re:First time? by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      You had salt shakers? --I envy you.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    39. Re:First time? by bonch · · Score: 1

      No, it's not!

    40. Re:First time? by Rotting · · Score: 1

      I shouldn't have waited to sign up for my /. account...

      My first account was on Rob's Linux page at cs.hope.edu/~rmalda or whatever it was. The one where he had the faked transparent rxvt with the checkerboard background ;)

    41. Re:First time? by scorp1us · · Score: 1

      Loop-back connector.

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    42. Re:First time? by CmpterJones · · Score: 1

      I was helping a roommate get his laptop back up and running after he pounded it with his fist (made a neat screaching sound when the HDD tried to spin up), and he had an Ubuntu live CD that he wanted to try (Gutsy, I think it was). I told him the damage was definitely physical and it would cost him if he wanted it back up and running, but he didn't have the money.

      After that he just forgot about it. Perhaps a year ago I stumbled across the laptop again (he was long gone at this point) and decided to put a new drive in and get it working. I used Hardy Heron (8.04) and instantly started having fun. Took some work getting the integrated WiFi working (thanks, Wicd!), but it ran like a dream. I then installed Xubuntu on my girlfriend's old, ailing machine, and repeated the process on my other roommate's old Dell laptop (incidentally, she hated it).

      I've since moved on to try other distros. My girlfriend has completely settled into that laptop, and she just re-installed it with Jaunty this past weekend (upgrade mirrors were SLOW, so she hit the torrent and burned a CD).

      I've derived more fun from installing and configuring Linux distros in recent months than I have from playing games. I'm currently triple-booting my desktop between Vista Home Premium 64-bit, Windows 7 64-bit, and Debian (lenny) amd64. I spend 90% of my time on the computer in Debian.

    43. Re:First time? by Innova · · Score: 1

      Keep trying...

    44. Re:First time? by ShadowXOmega · · Score: 0

      rm -f . someone told me that was a command to check the disk space.... phew

    45. Re:First time? by Elvii · · Score: 1

      And trying again...

      --
      This sig left intentionally blank.
    46. Re:First time? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

      Installed from floppies in the early 90's. 0.99.something.

      On an x386 with 6 Mb RAM.

      Primary purpose at work was to have a networking stack and ftp files off my computer to other PCs in the lab, without having to resort to floppies.

      No X (but that came soon enough). No package managers.

      The big argument was whether it was ".tar.gz" or ".tgz".

      I remember writing a script to ftp archives that made up the installation floppy sets (the A set, B set, etc., eventually the X set), and checking hashes to see if anything had changed between the time I started a download and it finished (at 9600 bps).

      No web in those days.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
  2. I tried to access the floppy drive by iYk6 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I tried to access the floppy drive. Eventually gave up, and re-installed Windows. That was 1998. I finally installed Debian Aug 2006 and it's been running on this machine ever since.

    Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

    1. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Swizec · · Score: 1

      My first tries with linux ended miserably with going back to win95 beacuse my hard-drive wasn't big enough or something, dunno, Turbolinux 6.5 was uninstallable.

      My first successful try was Mandrake around 2003 and I've been a full-time linux user ever since; primarily it was because learning C/C++ was much much easier done in linux than on windows.

    2. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by wisty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Similar story. Gave up on the X-server setup. Come Ubuntu, and apt-get, the tables turned and Linux was just easier.

    3. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by plasmidmap · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

      More like Windows is a bad stain-- it might take several washes to get it out!

    4. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

      More like Windows is a bad stain-- it might take several washes to get it out!

      so, a bad stain is worse than a drug addiction?? if not, which OS would u describe as a drug addiction??

    5. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if you try to wash it in the public river that is Linux. Might take you a while until you find the place with the clean water.

    6. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by N3Roaster · · Score: 3, Funny

      My first Linux experience was when a friend was trying to install it and for whatever reason just couldn't get it to work. At the time I was a Mac person who had played around with a lot of different things, but my friend figured that since I was writing software (never mind that writing software and using software are pretty different skill sets) maybe I might be able to help. So, knowing nothing about how to install Linux, I asked him to show me what he had done. He put in the first Slackware disk, started the computer, went through the installation, and... it just worked. At the end, he had a working computer running Linux. A few days later he told me what he did differently. He accidentally deleted the partition with Windows. Oops, but he learned that he didn't need that after all.

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    7. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by dov_0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

      More like Windows is a bad stain-- it might take several washes to get it out!

      so, a bad stain is worse than a drug addiction?? if not, which OS would u describe as a drug addiction??

      Linux, but more like Soma in Brave New World. Not harmful, just gives u a bit of a rush every now and then.

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    8. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      All too easy: gentoo.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    9. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Frankie70 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tried to access the floppy drive. Eventually gave up, and re-installed Windows. That was 1998. I finally installed Debian Aug 2006 and it's been running on this machine ever since.

      So basically you just waited for floppy drives to get obsolete?

    10. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i knew about linux but stayed away in fear of messing up the windows install. then i came to know about this linux distro aimed at windows users which could be tried first without modifying the current data (live cd). so the first time was when i put in the dapper drake cd and the brown wallpaper showed up in 800x600.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    11. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Jurily · · Score: 3, Funny

      I tried to access the floppy drive. Eventually gave up, and re-installed Windows.

      I hear ya. I was looking for drive C:, and when I found it, it wasn't working like I expected.

      Oh, and kernel modules came in a single .c file and a README that said "just type gcc [...]". I was yelling "WHERE, YOU PIECE OF SHIT?!" for a week. What did keep me there was the fact that the installer was able to set my screen up for 1024x768@43i, and win98 couldn't do that.

      Oh, ever seen KDE 3.0 on 16 Mb RAM? It was quite... educational.

    12. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. Tried to get a gui running around 1997; gave up. Set up a headless web server in 1999 that ran until an IDE controller failure last year. Linux is still my go-to solution for any headless application, and I still avoid it for GUI applications. Too much interface variation between applications.

      I keep hoping: every time a new machine appears at home or work, it gets the latest trendy linux for a day, before going back to Windows. Maybe I've just got too many years invested in MS-paradigm interfaces.

    13. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      I didn't give up that easily.

      I think it was 1996 for me, and I tried RH, the installer crashed, then downloaded 14 install floppies for Debian 2.x.

      Over dialup. Took a couple of overnights.

      Then I installed it on a spare machine (yes, had spare machines in 1996) and took about a weeks worth of overnights downloading all the needed packages over the same dialup.

      My biggest problem at the time was trying to figure out how to turn the damned thing off from the command line. Seems pretty obvious in hindsight - "poweroff" - but it wasn't to me at the time.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    14. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Jurily · · Score: 5, Funny

      so, a bad stain is worse than a drug addiction?? if not, which OS would u describe as a drug addiction??

      Linux, but more like Soma in Brave New World. Not harmful, just gives u a bit of a rush every now and then.

      Gentoo install. "Just one more package before I go to sleep". Then you wake up three days later with your keyboard imprinted on your forehead.

    15. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Jurily · · Score: 1

      My biggest problem at the time was trying to figure out how to turn the damned thing off from the command line. Seems pretty obvious in hindsight - "poweroff" - but it wasn't to me at the time.

      I just did the tried and tested method I learned from all the win95 and win98 blue screens: the power button. None of that ATX crap either.

    16. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      ...as opposed to the cesspit where you found Windows?

    17. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Jurily · · Score: 2, Informative

      Similar story. Gave up on the X-server setup. Come Ubuntu, and apt-get, the tables turned and Linux was just easier.

      Eh? RedHat 7.3 worked beautifully for me every time. I just had to tell it what monitor I had because it the hardware did not know about DDC. Win98, on the other hand, failed miserably and I couldn't use 1024x768 on it.

    18. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by the_brobdingnagian · · Score: 1

      Messing up the X config was one of the best things I did in Linux. I just switched to cli-only for the next few months. This is how I forced myself past the "high learning curve" and I enjoy it ever since. I think it was slackware linux when I was fifteen or sixteen. I was completely Windows-free well before I was out of high school.

    19. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Funny, I stopped using floppies around the time I started using Linux. I tested Windows later, but kept using Linux.

    20. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by greenguy · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. I spent days trying to get my monitor to look right.

      Then I did some construction in my loft, and got sawdust in my fan, which brought it to a halt (which I didn't realize). This resulted in the motherboard melting down. I went back to Macs for another two years.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    21. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was very young (10-12?) when I learned about Linux and FreeBSD. My uninformed opinion preferred FBSD. I got a copy of "Linux for Dummies", which included a RedHat 4 cd. I never did figure out how to get pppd working, let alone achieving my goal of understanding computer programming. I had to go to college for the latter. On the other hand, by "understanding computer programming" I mean understanding the ramifications of the relationships between the typed lambda calculus, category theory, monadic logic, the "full" constructive first-order logic, lattices, Turing machines, etc.

      My first successful Linux install was Debian Woody, on a 500 MHz iMac, c 2003. I used it for watching Naruto and Full Metal Alchemist over the summer.

    22. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by tehgnome · · Score: 1

      Mandrake for me also, dual booted for about a year before switching to Ubuntu. My first real task in linux besides installing hundreds of programs which i would never use, was renaming enormous amounts of images; something that i hated doing in windows could now be automated.

      --
      She must be a TIGER in the bathroom... I mean bedroom... ~Ryan
    23. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      1024x768@43i

    24. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      What did keep me there was the fact that the installer was able to set my screen up for 1024x768@43i

      Ow! The headaches you must have had!!! (I can't stand CRT refreshes below 70hz)

    25. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

      I hear ya. I was looking for drive C:, and when I found it, it wasn't working like I expected.

      How did you find it? I still can't find C:\ on my linux distros ;-)

    26. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

      Sometimes it takes not getting your first linux disk from some guru with no knowledge of what the average user wants

      My first linux disk from such a person led to a scary looking command prompt with no info on the login, or how to get to a gui (it was some kind of liveboot disk). After spending a few hours to learn it was "root", "root", and that the command was startx, and that further i could RTFM with "man" (that was helpful to learn 3 hours later!), i threw the disk in the garbage.

      if you want to get people to use alternatives (paint.net, firefox, linux, etc etc etc), you have to actually show the user how to USE it, and what the benefits of doing so are. It does noone a service if you install [linux | firefox | openoffice] and then neglect to make sure they can use it.

    27. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      My first was with a Knoppix LiveCD back in 2002(03?) which would boot but the X Server would crash(not that I knew what that was at the time) and then it was a week or two with with Mandrake but I didn't like it at all so then I installed Slackware and began learnign Linux the hardcore way. Looking back, it would have been alot easier to have used something a bit more freindly but on the other hand I am just as if not more comfortable doing things using a shell then with a GUI.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    28. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Ow! The headaches you must have had!!! (I can't stand CRT refreshes below 70hz)

      Interlaced. The picture was a bit dimmer, but the actual refresh rate is 85 Hz. Much less annoying, than the 56 Hz on 800x600. Yes, it was a crappy monitor. And again, Windows thought it knows better than me.

    29. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know the feeling, I fell asleep 2 days ago at my laptop, while installing Gentoo in a VM.

      Apparently I make a great conversationalist while I'm sleep-talking. You can have in-depth conversations with me while I sleep. =/

    30. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      It is in the .wine folder in your home directory :)

    31. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is hard to find words for how much your post sucks. I guess there is always at least one guy who is offended by the painful truth of a simple joke.

      It was clear from the beginning that Windows is like the stain. So it comes to no surprise that you get it from a dirty place. And it is also not very surprising that by using Windows you harden that stain. It isn't even funny. It just sucks.

    32. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by jakykong · · Score: 1

      I was windows-free *before* high school, technically. But it's cheating, because I was homeschooled and started high school 2 years late (still finished early).

      I used the GUI some, but from a very early stage of the learning curve, I found the shell to be much more useful than the GUI. So I basically run the GUI for web browsing and background tasks (auto e-mail checking, jukebox, whatnot) and have about a dozen console windows open at any given moment. Compiz helps to organize them, though, and I think if anything it'd be compiz I'd have a hard time giving up if X died.

    33. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      And to think by how much knoppix and mepis predate ubuntu... and dual boot predated even that ;)

    34. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      My first install was slackware when I was ~13, and I played with xorg.conf somewhat the first thing I did... And seeing just how "great" Mesa software rendering was...

    35. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      It took me ages to learn su -c "shutdown -h now". Then after several years, and learning init 0 or telinit 0 did the same thing... I learnt about poweroff... hmm...

    36. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      First time was a RedHat. Maybe 1999, not sure when. I still have the CD and floppies laying around somewhere. This was my introduction to Hardware Hell. None of my modems worked, I knew next to nothing, the man pages didn't make a lot sense to me, and I gave up.

      Since the wife and I were on the same computer at the time, I had little choice but to put Windows back on the machine, so that she could browse the internet and check email, and PLAY GAMES!!

      Eventually, maybe 2003, I bought hardware that "supports Linux". Even so, I wandered around on the edges of hardware hell for awhile before I got it working.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    37. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      If you watch closely, the ones who always constantly reboots even while their OS doesn't tell them to do, ones always clears caches, check integrity of files comes from Windows land. It doesn't matter if it is OS X or Linux or even... Symbian!

      Quote from me to developer of an app, on IM: "I know I can just logout and login but I used Windows for 8 years." That is after he told me there is absolutely no need to reboot.

      It is even like some kind of war syndrome. You can never get rid of that feeling.

    38. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I always used [ctrl] [alt] [Del], the tried and tested method from Dos 6.22/Windows 3.1.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    39. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had it easy. Whey I tried Linux (that was Slackware 2 if I remember correctly), I found that my graphics card, which I had bought explicitly because it was supposed to be supported by XF86, actually didn't work. So I asked S3 for the documentation of the graphics chip and TI for docs on the RAMDAC. After i got both, I found that there was just a two or three registers set incorrectly and I got accelerated 32bit graphics. Wohooo.

      Soon after that I bought a network card. It was an Intel ISA card and was supposed to be supported by the kernel. I wasn't really that surprised to find that it wasn't. Intel required an NDA for the docs, so I sent that one off and got a nice binder with documentation. A few days later, I had a patch (a few hundrer lines max) that made a related driver functional for this new model.

    40. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by qmaqdk · · Score: 1

      ...1024x768@43i, and win98 couldn't do that.

      43i?!? Can you still see? And how many pills did you need to pop to counter the headache?

      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    41. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha Ha that's so funny..... but true!

    42. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Wamellx · · Score: 1

      You are so so right, I recently installed Ubuntu on my Vista machine. I still have to go back to Vista just for MS Office. Sad, I know.

      --
      O RLY!?!
    43. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu for a half-holiday, Debian for a weekend, Slackware for a trip to the gorgeous East, LFS for a dark eternity on the moon.

    44. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by mikehoskins · · Score: 1

      I did floppy installs, but before that, in 1992 or 1993 a friend and I installed SLS from QIC tape (Linux 0.9x).

      He had a COMPAQ with a hard drive measured in megabytes.

      He worked on a C program to demonstrate multitasking, which he couldn't as easily do on DOS.

      If only we knew that we could have written a few line shell script to do the same.

    45. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Arceliar · · Score: 2, Funny

      You jest, but... have I got a story for you...

      July, 2005, day 3 of the gentoo install. A friend asked me to put it on his iBook, and I have severely underestimated the time it takes for this machine to compile code. I have not slept since the ordeal started. But, at last, I am sitting at a functioning xterm, and am watching as the last few bits of gnome compile. I victoriously initialize one last emerge, after seeing that everything finally appears to be in working order, deciding that it can compile a few bits of additional software while I sleep.

      I enter my room just after 1:00 PM and pull back the blankets on my bed, intending to fall asleep before I even hit the pillow. From above, I hear my older brother shout "OH MY GOD, THE HOUSE IS ON FIRE!!". The general area around the power meter, also where the power to the house comes in, had ignited, for what I immediately expect to be an electrical fire.

      I don't know what else to say, so I'll just say it: I escaped the blaze, on roughly my 51st hour awake, with a cat in one arm and a fresh gentoo install, still compiling, in the other.

    46. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Yeah Mandrake. I knew I was late to the game, but finally tried Mandrake 6. I picked that one for the graphical installer. It was easy and nice looking with a ton of dev tools. I was happy. Wish I'd tried it sooner.

      They never should have changed the name. Mandrake Linux could not be confused with Mandrake the Magician.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    47. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to access the floppy drive. Eventually gave up, and re-installed Windows. That was 1998. I finally installed Debian Aug 2006 and it's been running on this machine ever since.

      In 1998, I'd already decided that Microsoft were an untrustworthy company punting badly designed and poorly written software. So I bought BeOS and couldn't get it to install on any of my hardware. That was when I found linux and was unable to get an X server running. I signed up for a few free shell accounts, bought a book and continued poking around distros at home. Somehow I managed to learn my way around the system and finally switched from Win2k to a linux desktop in 2002. Shortly after that I was made admin on my employers mail and web servers.

      The first thing I did with linux was to fail. That perfectly healthy and perfectly natural first step in any endevour... except parachuting.

    48. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much interface variation between applications.

      As opposed to Windows where almost every app uses a different toolkit? A large number of GTK and QT apps are available for windows and even these have a more native-like interface than many of the proprietry 3rd party apps people run. It's not just 3rd party apps either, Microsoft's own software is woefully inconsistent.

      every time a new machine appears at home or work, it gets the latest trendy linux for a day, before going back to Windows. Maybe I've just got too many years invested in MS-paradigm interfaces.

      I once themed IceWM to look and behave more or less exactly like XP pro at the behest of a collegue. The first thing I do with XFCE is get it configured the way I want it. Auto hiding top panel as taskbar, auto hiding bottom panel for application launchers, workspace switches and clock. If you want your desktop to behave like Windows, make it so. My complaint is not "UI paradigm", it's that neither Windows or OSX have basic window management on a par with XFWM or fluxbox.

    49. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by dakohli · · Score: 1
      I liked the tried and true:

      init 0

    50. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Well my first time was a lot better than yours. But then I had used unix before. However i did have to write some driver code to get my X windows working. VESA bus stuff. Fun times....

      Anyway, my point was that this was when you could tell your card to do any set of valid H sync and dot clocks that it could do, it just didn't care about the monitor, and monitors didn't have "protection". So I have this newer monitor and I want some hi res stuff on the large 16" beast, and I hate the flicker you get at 60Hz.......

      All I got was a loud popping sound and a *lot* of smoke. Monitors were expensive back then. It hurt.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    51. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My first experience was in 96 with debian 1.0. I heard my friends saying how cool linux was. After a few attempts and trashing my partitions, it finally booted up. All I got was a blinking cursor and said, "what the fuck is so cool about this?"
       
          I dual booted for a long time, but
      I actually had way more technical issues with windows than I did with linux. I've had lots of data issues and so on.
       
        I think in 2002 is when I finally kicked windows to the side and haven't looked back since.

    52. Re:I tried to access the floppy drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried to access the floppy drive. Eventually gave up, and re-installed Windows. That was 1998. I finally installed Debian Aug 2006 and it's been running on this machine ever since.

      Windows is like a drug addiction. Sometimes it takes several tries to kick it.

      I have installed suse 6.1 in ?2001? I wanted to run a dos based PBX management stuff on it. at last I was used it as fileserver :)

  3. If I remember correctly... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...it was a Mini-Linux distribution in size of four floppies which I downloaded from some BBS. This distribution used the UMSDOS file system and could be started from a DOS prompt (didn't have a spart hard drive).

    I remember that I even managed to get X working after a while, but to be honest Linux looked for me as a huge step back from OS/2 Warp which I preferred those days.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    1. Re:If I remember correctly... by Leebert · · Score: 1

      t was a Mini-Linux distribution in size of four floppies which I downloaded from some BBS.

      It was a BBS for me, too (Christmas 1994, IIRC...) I was, humorously enough, looking for a copy of Minix. And I ran across a copy of the SLS distro.

      I don't much recall what I did with the installation early on, though. Mostly just fumbled around with it.

    2. Re:If I remember correctly... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      mulinux?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:If I remember correctly... by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think mine was a CD on a magazine cover. 1998 I think, perhaps '99. Funnily enough, I think I first read /. on that system, but of course I didn't register until around 2004/5 or something

      I Had a lot of trouble getting it to behave the way I wanted on a pentium with 16MB of ram. At first it was little more than a test web server. Definitely not a desktop.

      I kept trying until I discovered enlightenment (in beta), which to date is still my favourite ever desktop environment thingy. Kind of like the maid. Clean, quick and pretty, but start to fuck with it and things get complicated...

      These days I use Linux 100% on my own machines, gnome and android, and have trouble understanding why anyone would actually want Windows or OSX. Seriously, XP is a bitch to set up to work efficiently, any windows OS after that is so slow that it's not funny and OSX requires the apple 100% tax for no obvious advantage.

      Yay, got my OS of choice flamewar trigger in ; )

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
  4. Run a stadium message board by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    The first time I encountered Linux, it was installed on a computer that ran a stadium message board. It was at a part-time job I worked at night.

    The first time I used it "seriously" was when I was working with SunOS to mass convert CAD drawings to AutoCAD. I wanted to see if I could use the utilities that we had on SunOS on a free operating system on Intel machines to avoid having to buy more Sun workstations. It worked pretty well!

    1. Re:Run a stadium message board by HitoGuy · · Score: 1

      Um. I hate to break it to you, but SunOS was never Linux.

      --
      I am beginning to think that maybe Darl McBride was attacked viciously by a penguin as a child.
    2. Re:Run a stadium message board by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but that is not what he wrote. Read it again.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  5. Knoppix by mc1138 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My first time wasn't even an install it was just a boot of my existing computer. It took way to long to figure out I had to run sudo su to do anything cool, but once that was done I figured out how to use nmap and got friends to do a direct connect via gaim and scanned their computers for them... yeah... for them... :)

    1. Re:Knoppix by apoc.famine · · Score: 4, Funny

      My first time wasn't even an install either.....I think the install came during try #6 or something.
       
      What was the first thing I did with Linux? Fail. Fail and give up.
       
      Of course, I always got pissed at Windows a month later, and tried another flavor. On and off for two years, until I did the unthinkable....
       
      I did a Gentoo minimal install.
       
      So I guess the first thing I did with linux was watch Gentoo compile. (Guess that's the last thing I'll also do with linux, eh?)

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    2. Re:Knoppix by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Funny

      So I guess the first thing I did with linux was watch Gentoo compile. (Guess that's the last thing I'll also do with linux, eh?)

      Is that because it's still compiling??

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    3. Re:Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so when is it supposed to be done?

    4. Re:Knoppix by flappinbooger · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to work with a guy who, on a monday, said he installed gentoo over the weekend. Not too long after he said he was getting divorced. I wonder if it was related?

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    5. Re:Knoppix by fr4nk · · Score: 1

      [...] installed gentoo over the weekend [...]

      Whoa, that must be some wicked Beowulf cluster!

    6. Re:Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] installed gentoo over the weekend [...]

      Whoa, that must be some wicked Beowulf cluster!

      distcc, bitch!

  6. A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    A boot floppy and stack of floppies, IIRC. Later, more bloated, distros required an entire CD. Getting X running with FVWM as a window manager required going into XF86.conf (or .config?) and hand tweaking mode lines.

    Hand hacking the config file for the 28.8k external modem to get online. Downloading Netscape, or maybe still Mosaic?

    Then came the fun of getting the USB mouse working by rewriting the USB drivers and running GCC.

    Then building my own kernel (a 1.9.x, IIRC) to wring every last space cycle out of the processor, and every last byte out of 4MB.

    Installing a second (!) internal hdd, a GB or so, so I could put the swap partition on the non-root drive. For greater performance.

    Last week I fired up VMware on my Mac. Pointed it at the Ubuntu DVD ISO. Installed a new VM which worked fine without any tweaking.

    I never though Linux would get boring.

  7. The first boot thrill is an end in itself by sharkette66 · · Score: 1

    I just remember being thrilled at a command prompt with something other than DOS. Some early Redhat it was. And then getting an X-window up and loving the right-click.

    What did I "do"? I just enjoyed the thrill. Late 90's or so.

    I remember law students staring at me sideways in 1999 when I booted Caldera on my laptop... just wanted to see how wasy it was to use real-time in class. People still stare funny when they see Linux on a laptop.

  8. Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by downix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd heard of Linux while at school, so during summer break I saw a book, "Linux Unleashed" with a copy of the latest Slackware (3.0) at the back. So, I bought the book, took it home, made the boot floppies, and proceeded to blow away the Windows 3.1 and installed Slackware 3.0 on the machine. Took a good 45 minutes (it was a 486SX2-50) but then, I was there. I configured my PPP dialer (took half the time than with Winsock dialer) and logged onto my ISP and proceeded to install ircII to then chat with my friends on IRC. I had an IRC star trek game to attend that weekend, so I logged into DALNet and then went to play my game, all the while enjoying the B&W plain jane interface. Then I flipped through the book and found the page talking about virtual terminals. ALT+F2 and BAM, I was then using Lynx to browse the web at the same time. I was in hog heaven. ALT+F3 and I was learning how to make an Xconfiguration script to try and turn on the GUI. then the magical moments, I typed startx.... and 5 minutes later fvwm came up! Rediculously slow compared to today, but compared to Win3.1 and OS/2 2.11, I was loving every moment of it.

    I still have the hard drive from that old machine, still sporting Slackware 3.0 on it, with the 1.0.13 kernel in all of its glory residing as vmlinuz.orig.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      I did the same - got my copy of the book at Frys Electronics. Problem was, and I didn't know it at the time, my emachine I was trying to do the install on had a processor that wasn't going to work. I tried for weeks and finally gave up. A year or so later I picked up a copy of Suse at the same Frys. By then I also had a new machine with a different processor - things went smoothly. At roughly the same time I started using Redhat at work.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by txoof · · Score: 1

      I had that same book and a craptacular 486 SX 25! I think it had a green cover and a CD with all sorts of goodness attached. I couldn't get my crappy ATAPI CD drive to work under linux though so it was just an endless stream of writing stuff to floppies.

      I have a similarly fond memory of discovering VTs. I thought it amazing that I could irc, read my mail and use lynx all at the same time and without the bloat and pain of windows. That was a turning moment for me and Linux.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    3. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by downix · · Score: 1

      See, now I had a Panasonic 2x CD-ROM drive that plugged right into my sound card... strangely enough, Linux is the only OS I had on that machine that didn't freak out the first time I tried to use it.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    4. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Aahhh, you all suck.

      I had an AMD 486DX/40 overclocked to 50MHz.

      None of this newfangled clock-doubling crap.

      Kids today.

      Get off my lawn.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    5. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by stevey · · Score: 1

      I remember waiting minutes for X to start on my mediocre 586 machine (a cyrix clone, not a pentium).

      Worse still was waiting 10 minutes for Netscape Navigator to launch - and the fear when you say "Loading Java.." in the status bar which meant your surfing was paused enough for you to go make a new cup of tea.

      Even now I still find myself typing "netscape -no-java &" in rare moments, even though I'm running Iceweasel/Debian.

      My first distro was RedHat 4.2 I think. I remember an upgrade to 5.0 which hosed the machine at least.

      (Mind I remember doing some crazy things like "rm /etc/passwd" - and then reinstalling because I didn't know how to recover from such mistakes!)

    6. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, i still have that Linux Unleashed book somewhere...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    7. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Kernel 1.0.14? I ran Slackware 2.0 and I had kernel 1.1.47.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Problem was, and I didn't know it at the time, my emachine I was trying to do the install on had a processor that wasn't going to work.

      You had an eMachine with a 286?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by downix · · Score: 1

      1.2.13, my mistake. (you made me have to boot up that drive for the first time in forever to look that up)

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    10. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by JTorres176 · · Score: 1

      I remember a friend showing up at my house with a box of 1.44" floppies in a shoebox telling me "You have to install this." It was Slackware for an old IBM 380XD which I'd had for about 6 months. After a weekend of Tequizas and using lycos to try to find answers to problems, we finally got it installed and running for the next 3 or 4 years before I updated to a newer version.

      --
      Evil Walrus >83=
    11. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by txoof · · Score: 1

      Ohhh! A math co-processor! I could only dream of having a DX back in the day. Lucas Arts X-Wing ran OK if I turned down all of the FX, but Tie-Fighter ran for shite on my 486 SX rockin' the world at 25 whole MHz.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    12. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      I had a similar experience a few years later. I had known about the existence of Linux from doing some web development and seeing the Linux dedicated servers for my favorite online games, but had never actually used it. I had shitty dialup and not much motivation, so I wouldn't download it. At some point however I came across an issue of Maximum Linux magazine which included a Mandrake install CD.

      I installed that, got it running in a dual boot environment, then discovered that it didn't support my 3D card, sound card, or modem, so I promptly rebooted to Windows. A few months later I bought a Sound Blaster card and had discovered linmodems.org (I think) so I could at least get online and hear sounds. An X update gave me 3D graphics, so now I was ready to try it out as a full time OS. That lasted about three days before the desire to play Counter-Strike pushed me back to Windows.

      I didn't try to seriously use Linux again until 2004 when Ubuntu came out. At that time Fedora couldn't properly figure out my widescreen laptop, but Ubuntu got it out of the box. I had never used a Debian-based distro before, but I quickly fell in love with APT and since then have never looked back.

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    13. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      No it was a Cyrix - MII I think. This was over 10 years ago so I'm not 100% positive on the details. It may have been possible to get that slackware install to work - but I wasn't going to get it done back then with it being my first ever install. I tried a ton of different things but couldn't get it to work. It would seem to install o.k. (which took quite a while and a lot of floppies) but it would crash when it tried to boot.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    14. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      A 486SX had a math co-processor. It was just disabled at the factory.

      The 487SX was a full 486DX with a different pinout, so if you installed a 487SX, you actually had a pair of 486DX procs, but the original one with the disabled co-proc was completely disabled when you added the 487SX.

      Marketing. Go figure.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    15. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      FUCK YOU!! I had the same hardware and the same distro (3.1, if I recall), with vastly different results. I can't believe I'm still bitter about that...

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    16. Re:Slackware 3.0 at the back of Linux Unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brother, me too! Same book, same version of Slack (still a Slacker with v12.0) and yes I still have that original drive with Slackware 3.0 on it too.

  9. Red Hat 5.0 install in 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to copy the files onto a hard drive, change the ownership with chown and then install it on an HP 486 based machine with 2 GB hard drive and 48 MB of RAM. It was Red Hat 5.0. After I had it installed I just played around inside it to see how various things worked since I was so unfamiliar with the programs in it. That was January 1998. I had it running but could not do any work with it. Now all the distributions are work ready from my experience in downloading and trying many of them with a spare computer.

    1. Re:Red Hat 5.0 install in 1998 by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      48MB?!

      Man, that would have been a dream for my first install.

      4MB RAM, with a 1.2GB HD.
      Replacing Windows 3.1 on the machine, because it couldn't use the full 1.2GB. (The drive had already been replaced when it failed. The original was about 250MB.)

      Belonged to a friend of mine when the drive was swapped, and they gave it to me a while later. It was identical to my other machine at the time, other than the drive, because we'd both bought them from the same place about the same time, and taken advantage of the same promotion.

      It let me do some really good comparisons between Linux/Windows, though, because of the hardware similarity.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  10. Both feet, you say? by codefungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First time was kind of mandated by moneyless employer. With my own Windows Compaq laptop in hand, I flew to Atlanta and was greeted by a bunch of old Unix hippies. I was to write PHP/miniSQL code for them but had only one computer to do it on, mine. Problem was that I had windows and they wanted me to run RH. So, I totally wiped my machine and installed RH. Even at that time (years ago), I had no problem getting Red Hat installed (5.2?) on my presario.
    Ever since then my tolerance of Windows has been in nothing but decline.

    Long live The Penguin!!

    --
    -- A cat is no trade for integrity!
    1. Re:Both feet, you say? by Jurily · · Score: 2, Funny

      Long live The Penguin!!

      You mean the devil.

    2. Re:Both feet, you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, here's mine.

      My first linux machine was an Atari TT030. I loved it but looking back it was a strange and expensive bird. I ran Debian on it. I forget the exact year but that was when kernel 2.2 was a new thing. I could run X on this machine, but only with the most spartan window manager. I spent many hours just recompiling every part of the GNU toolchain for fun. Yeah. But I did learn an awful lot that was a good foundation for what I do now.

      I moved on to Intel hardware, with Mandrake, eventually got annoyed with their commercialization approach, tried Slackware, then went on to Gentoo for a bit and finally Ubuntu. Since Windows was never part of my early computing life, even at work, it never stuck. Or rather I use it when I am stuck with another person's computer.

    3. Re:Both feet, you say? by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      My first UNIX experience was some sort of terminal server thing we had to do in college, also we used NeXT boxes, nuff said there. After college I worked some with a solaris box for some CAD package I needed to use now and then.

      First linux install was RH5.2. I fiddled for hours to get X working, got dialup to work, got online, couldn't figure out anything else, decided that it just wasn't worth the time. Later I tried mandrake a time or 2, a few other flavors, then spent a looong time getting ubuntu 6 to work right.

      After investing significant hours getting dual display and video capture / editing to work, the culmination of video editing on linux was, at the time, so poor I went back to windows. But, since then, I have had several linux installs here and there, even put eeebuntu on my netbook (xp is faster).

      At work I have a 8.10 x64 install with XP, vista and win7 virtual machines running, and see no need to go back, there. Here at home the sole killer app is video editing, so windoze of some sort will likely soldier on in some form or another for a time.

      For me, the benchmark in video editing power and ease-of-use is vegas video. As soon as there is something equivalent to that or better on linux... or it runs with wine... FINALLY ditch windows altogether.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  11. Some Ancient Slackware distro. by DoninIN · · Score: 1

    That I don't think I ever got to work, followed by either SUSE or Caldera, which I did get work, but didn't really find anything much to do with either of them. Red hat in 97 or so was the first time I used Linux for any practical purposes.

  12. I started with version 0.97 for ONE reason by thomasdz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I downloaded (via FTP - since the web was barely born) Linux v0.97 kernel, tools, C-compiler, etc. in 1992 for just one reason... to play the curses-text game "rogue"
    And today... I'm going to be downloading Jaunty Jackalope (yes, sorry I'm late) Ubuntu and likely playing nethack (based on rogue) later this afternoon.
    Things never change

    Here's a Usenet post from me in 1992 bitching about "I DON'T WANT TO HACK THE KERNEL"
    http://groups.google.ca/group/comp.os.linux/browse_thread/thread/46815c0980f82296/458335391bd59a18?hl=en&q=dzubin+linux+linus

    Back in 1992 when I first started off with Linux, you downloaded two floppy images... you booted off one and halfway through the boot process you swapped disks...
    Since I lived in Victoria, Canada at the time, I was able to get the first distribution of a "packaged" ready-to-run Linux called SLS
    Later, I started using Slackware and kept using it until Ubuntu 6

    Thomas Dzubin

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:I started with version 0.97 for ONE reason by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Google Groups, digging up the past that was meant to be buried...

      Actually, just this weekend I yelled the same thing in my head when trying to get a webcam to work "I DON'T WANT TO HACK THE KERNEL!"

  13. I tried either of these two... by indre1 · · Score: 1
    My first Linux experience probably wasn't as long ago as it was for most Slashdotters.
    I can't remember exactly, but it was most probably either of these two:
    • Installing Linux on an old Pentium I 133mHz with some MB of memory and less than 1GB hard drive to run a small web-server and IRC bots. I ended up installing FreeBSD, as I found more documentation as a newbie.
    • Trying to partition or format a drive with Windows on it

    On both occasions, my hands were shivering just of the thought of messing around on command line, it seemed so "new" and exciting!

  14. Showing My Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember my first... I was part of a small dialup IP access trial in early 1991 using SLIP. The office wouldn't pay for a TCP/IP stack for home use, so I scoured the bazaars for something that would work. I ftp'd 33 diskette images from tsx-11.mit.edu and zmodem'd them to a Dell 486M - it was a .99pl3 kernel (!!!) (may have been Slackware - can't remember) ... It was a trial by fire - doing the install, then learning to patch the kernel to add SLIP... Worked great. A year later, I discovered that I was the only one in the trial group using IP to the remote desktop, since the others were using Windows...

  15. Slackware 0.99.14 by Trracer · · Score: 1

    Downloaded slackware 0.99.14 via the computer club at the local uni, back in 92-93. Remember it was around 30 floppies which basically took a whole weekend to install on my 386SX 20Mhz. I got X running on that machine, but basically stayed in text mode. It was used as a glorified terminal to dial into the uni to access different MUDs and IRC. Then I got ahold of a real serial terminal instead that I hooked up to the modem. It didnt make any noise at night, so my parents wouldnt wake up.
    Those were the days, now I got 100/100Mbit fiber directly to the house (in Sweden).

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  16. Ubuntu 8.10 2008 on a PPC, well, a PS3... by wambamthnkyumam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bought a PS3 and found out it could run linux. So, I installed intrepid ibex and loved it! If only I could figure out how to triple boot my MacBookPro...

    1. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 2008 on a PPC, well, a PS3... by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      A bit off topic, but extremely easy to do on any Mac.

      First things first. Install ReFit to make the OS boot selection easier. Very nice boot manager for OS X.

      Next, you install your Bootcamp, which will partition your OS X HD into two OS partitions (Refit first, OS X, and then Bootcamp partition last). Once completed, go into Disk Utility and shrink your OS X partition by whatever number of GB you want your Linux partition to be (Bootcamp should always have the last partition on your HD. If it isn't last, it doesn't work with the built in tools.

      Install whatever flavor of Linux you like and ensure you install your boot loader on the actual Linux partition and not on any of your other partitions (usually in the 'advanced' setup during the partitioning process in distros I've set up. Check the documentation)

      Rinse and repeat as needed for any number of OS's.

      That's it in a nutshell. VERY easy to do...

    2. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 2008 on a PPC, well, a PS3... by wambamthnkyumam · · Score: 1

      in a nutshell, yes. Reality is not a nutshell...

    3. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 2008 on a PPC, well, a PS3... by spasm · · Score: 1

      Caveat: ReFit works on any *intel* mac. No PPCs.

    4. Re:Ubuntu 8.10 2008 on a PPC, well, a PS3... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      I can do you one better, my first Linux was on the PS2, in May of 2002.

      I had been reading Slashdot for a couple of years and had read articles about this "Linux thing" so when SCEJ announced they were doing a Linux kit for Japan I was one of those who signed the petition to release the thing in the US. I was a WebTV user at the time. When they announced the kit's release in the US I pre-ordered it and bought some Linux books.

      I had to install "blind" because I didn't have a Sync-on-Green monitor, we didn't know there was a controller trick to boot the RTE and installer in NTSC mode, though we knew you could set it to boot in NTSC after you got it installed. Anyway after a few hours I had what was basically Sony's Kondara-ized RH6 install on my PS2.

      I've currently got Yellow Dog Linux 6.1 on my PS3.
       

  17. Linux helps you grow? by dov_0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Up to that point, I never thought of myself in any way, shape or form as a logical thinker. In some sense, I'm really not. But I learned something about myself. I learned that things go wrong in even completely logical settings for no apparent reason -- but there is a reason, and searching it down, identifying it, and solving it is actually fun and rewarding. I can't write code, but I am quite skilled in digging around in it and bending it to my will -- something I never dreamed I'd like doing.

    I must say that using Linux (manpages and all) has taught me a stack of confidence, logical thinking, problem solving skills etc as well as a lot about computers in general and how they run. I even run a PC repair business now as well as setting up free Linux boxes for disadvantaged students.

    Has anyone else found that using Linux has really helped them develop personally in this way?

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    1. Re:Linux helps you grow? by txoof · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know if using Linux has helped me develop logical thinking, but it certainly honed my ability to solve problems. The ability to read a log file and compare it to a man page to solve a problem has definitely grown out of my use of Linux.

      The self-sufficiency of reading a manual and determining how to use a tool and how to fix it when it is broken is an incredibly useful skill that is a gift that running linux has definitely given to me.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    2. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, Hobbes, dad is in that nerd site... *again*

    3. Re:Linux helps you grow? by DoninIN · · Score: 1

      Linux taught me a lot about computing, it certainly helped me with problem solving skills in terms of working on PCs even when they were running something else. Various knoppix disks and assorted distros over the years have certainly helped me identify bad or buggy hardware on many occasions. Damn Small Linux is the Linux I've gotten the most use out of myself, removing data from dead PCs finding out if sick computers were worth fixing etc.

    4. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say that using Linux (manpages and all) has taught me a stack of confidence, logical thinking, problem solving skills etc as well as a lot about computers in general and how they run.

      Your experience ("taught me confidence, logical thinking, problem solving skills") sounds like marine training or at least the boy scouts.

      Not something someone would like to inflict upon himself --especially if he is already confident, logical and a problem solver.

      In those cases, just use OS X.

      (Ha, mod me down now).

    5. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. I've worked through loads of problems. And I learned even more when I worked with Gentoo for a week or so...

    6. Re:Linux helps you grow? by greenguy · · Score: 1

      Getting sound working has taught me problem-solving skills -- and patience!

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    7. Re:Linux helps you grow? by garcia · · Score: 3, Funny

      Linux has caused me to become a drunk. I hate going through manpages, scouring through Linux support forums, and trying what seems to be an endless train of the same thing until I get so drunk that I do something I didn't plan on and the setup works.

      That said I've been running Linux on one machine or another since 1996 (beginning w/Slackware, moving to RH (for Alpha), and then finally moving to Debian where I've been since 2002). It still pisses me off that I have a couple of outstanding issues that have been around for the last 6.5 years but I'm just too fucking lazy to fix them. While I used to run Linux solely (between 1997 and 2002) I have moved to a server side Linux setup and a desktop Windows (and OS X, ugh) environment.

      I still get drunk and I have Linux to blame. Don't drink the penguin!

    8. Re:Linux helps you grow? by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      I cant say it helped me grow in terms of conceptual reasoning skills but it definitely breathed brand new life into my computing knowledge.

      I am late to the party myself, I first ran into Linux about 2001 at the University of Florida in the astrophysics lab I worked at. The lab was making parts for the LIGO project which I was really happy to be a part of. They were using a version of SuSe (german lab manager :/) at the command line to calculate prorogation of laser modes through different lenses, etc.

      I wasn't that into it.

      About a year later a roommate of mine installed Mandrake on our hub computer to route the home network and since I was in-between computers at the time I used that terminal as my main computer. Thats when I started really getting into Linux.

      About two years after that (after finishing school and having the time I wanted to commit to learning it) I tried my first install and as a glutton for punishment but thinking that Gentoo was the most suited distro for my liking (which it is) I picked up Gentoo 2004.0. I couldnt figure out that install for about four months. When I finally learned gentoo which really taught me a lot about computing and Linux in general I was hooked and I have been an avid Gentoo user since. This is really how Linux expanded my understanding of computing to the next level.

      And no I am not Asian. And yes, I think Gentoo is the most underrated and underappreciated distro out there.

      Since then I have tried about every distro but I also come home to Gentoo (altho my netbook these days has ubuntu on it for simplicity sake).

      VIVA LINUX!

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
    9. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      I must say that using Linux (manpages and all) has taught me a stack of confidence, logical thinking, problem solving skills etc as well as a lot about computers in general and how they run. I even run a PC repair business now as well as setting up free Linux boxes for disadvantaged students.

      I am not sure that's an argument for or against chosing Linux.
      For eg. I was looking for a brand of TV to buy & someone said - "Buy this cheap chinese brand - it has taught me logical thinking,
      problem solving as well as a lot about Televisions in general & how they work. I have even setup up a TV repair business after
      owning this brand of TV for 2 years" - I would run away from that brand of TV.

    10. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, You have not developed...
      You have just recovered from the braindead state caused by exposure to Microsoft products (especially MS Windows and MS Office).

    11. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's the secret of the Way of the Drunken Linuxer in the Windows shadow

    12. Re:Linux helps you grow? by dakohli · · Score: 1

      I was living with my brother for a couple of years, and we were sharing a DSL connection. Routers will still expensive, so I converted an old P2 board which had 1G, and two NICs, and an old Floppy Drive into a Coyote Router. It worked like a charm, although the ISP refused to support it at all!

    13. Re:Linux helps you grow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally, my first experience was on Slackware 1.2.1 somewhere in '94-'95, I was a freshman in college. In order to get it working, I really had to figure out how to get all the different parts of the OS working with my specific system. For me, this base knowledge has allowed me to grow as a computer professional; these days I make my living am a systems architect.

  18. Caldera by bargainsale · · Score: 1

    Caldera (before the turn to the dark side) in a 1 G partition on the family desktop.
    I kept practically everything on the much bigger Win 98 partition and mounted it at boot.

    Second install was an ancient incarnation of RedHat (6 I think) on an old Toshiba laptop.
    Had to use framebuffer for the graphics for months before I got X to run properly.
    It was great.

    I've never used Windows since.
    Installing modern distros is just too easy ...

    --
    Aberrations have appeared in my destiny prognostication engine!
    1. Re:Caldera by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      I remember having a 4GB hard disk.

      --
      signature is pants
    2. Re:Caldera by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I remember having a 4GB hard disk.

      I remember having a 20MB drive, and before that using dual floppies. And I remember seeing full-height 5.25" 5MB drives.

      Plus, of course, 13" removable platter drives for CDC external drives and DEC minicomputers.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    3. Re:Caldera by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      And me, I remember punch cards!

      No, wait! toggling programs in binary on the front-panel switches!!!! (remember daß blinkenlights???)

    4. Re:Caldera by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Was that 20MB drive a "Hard Card"?

      Oh, the memories....

    5. Re:Caldera by Nutria · · Score: 1

      And me, I remember punch cards!

      A friend of mine had an Apple ][ w/ a Hayes Smartmodem; the school gave us permission to write our FORTRAN IV programs instead of waiting in line for the 3 punch card machines.

      It was a Burroughs mainframe (old even in 1984), though, which natively interacted with block-oriented smart terminals, and async serial mode was... underdeveloped. Painful.

      But after the suffering we could play Zork and ride his dirtbike.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    6. Re:Caldera by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Was that 20MB drive a "Hard Card"?

      Mine wasn't, but we had a few where I worked...

      Oh, the memories....

      40MB was surprisingly large back then.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    7. Re:Caldera by dakohli · · Score: 1

      All kidding aside, my first HD was 105 Mb. I was the envy of my peers, a 386sx-25 from Radio Shack! Honestly, I didn't know I should be embarrassed at the time!

    8. Re:Caldera by Nutria · · Score: 1

      All kidding aside, my first HD was 105 Mb. I was the envy of my peers, a 386sx-25

      You young whippersnappers!

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  19. My Experiences by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    The first version of Linux I played with was Caldera 1.3. Not a bad experience as I even managed to get X working. Had an internal 3Comn (USR) hardware modem that I actually managed to get working, which impressed me. Only reason I didn't stick with it at the time was the other family members who also used the computer. Next was a book on Linux that included RH 5 and Star Office 4 and when I finally got a 100M zip drive, I gave Zip Slack a try. Currently I'm using Gentoo since 2003 though I've been forced to switch between Linux and Windows due to school needs. My current setup is pure Gentoo with XP in a VBox 2.1.4 VM for those apps that simply don't have Linux versions.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  20. First *install*? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    How about before that, trying to get the kernel to compile before there was a way to install it.

    If you *must* insist, i guess i remember bit editing the kernel so it would boot off HD instead of floppy.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  21. First step: copy installation media to floppy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time for me was March 1995, I got a slackware on CD, but could not install it directly because the CD-ROM drive (Philips proprietary interface) was not supported. I copied everything to floppy, using MS-DOS, and installed the full set. Almost. Well, not really... I installed all that would fit on a 120MB hard disk, and I was really excited. Then I got to the command line, and typed "X", and waited...

    Second step was obvious: compile a new kernel (1.2.x). It took about 10 hours.

    Third step: I started waiting for other software to install on it (and in the meantime I learned emacs).

  22. Gave up on soundcard by meist3r · · Score: 1

    My first Linux experience was back in the day with SuSe 6.0, bought that in a bookstore with a fat manual (that was useless to me) and tried to install it when my Windows 98 SE had one of it's breakdowns. After fiddling with the installer and things for hours I couldn't get my soundcard to work and had nothing really productive to do with the system (note that "productive" back then meant playing Counterstrike). Since the sound didn't work so I couldn't listen to music, I couldn't get online because I didn't figure out how to dial-up and no game would even install I went running back to Windows. I was 16 and very silly at the time :P

    In the meantime I had my "real" first time with Ubuntu Dapper and it was a fullblown success. I switched to Linux immediately and faded out Windows over the course of three months. So far I don't play that much at all anymore and mostly do Internet related filesharing and open source stuff.

    The old saying is true, I guess, the first time is almost always horrible and forgettable.

  23. My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Installed one distro. Sucked. Installed another. Sucked. Tried bootstrapping Gentoo. Failed. Installed Solaris. Sucked. Installed FreeBSD. Done.

    1. Re:My experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mine was kinda similar:
      Red Hat (sucked) -> Debian (sucked a bit less) -> Fedora (sucked a lot more) -> Ubuntu (To disable suckage you'll have to modify /etc/suck.conf and recompile kernel 2.6.24-i686-NOT-SUCKAGE) -> Slackware (Didn't suck as much but eh) -> FreeBSD (Suckage for Linux can be run via the Linux ABI)

  24. Slack, baby! by vic-traill · · Score: 1

    Slackware, w/ 0.99 kernel w/ some long forgotten patch level. We were using SCO for named and some mail services, and even then I guess we knew we wanted to get out of that. Actually, just wanted a second name server on site, and didn't want to put out the dollars for SCO plus the TCP add-on software module. If you can imagine a flavour of *nix that actually offered TCP/IP as an option. Today it just seems absurd.

    A whole bunch of floppies and rawrite. Later, tried the network based install and it actually worked. We were pretty impressed by that.

    --
    [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    1. Re:Slack, baby! by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      If you can imagine a flavour of *nix that actually offered TCP/IP as an option. Today it just seems absurd.

      Heh. The spirit of this still lives on in Win32/64. One's app has to initialize the system IP DLL (AKA: Winsock) before one can do *anything* with the network... even something as simple as gethostname.

  25. The year was 1999? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was Red Hat 6 on a pc.... it was really annoying, nothing worked.
    Couple of years later: ubuntu. everything worked.
    Though that was on a macbook.

  26. Mandrake 6.2(?) by kestasjk · · Score: 1

    The main hurdle was getting through the IIS proxy with NTLM auth, but didn't get into it

    --
    // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
  27. a few bad experiences, but a lifesaver by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    have been trying to get ubuntu and kubuntu installed on my comp since 7.04 each time i end up without a bootloader when i do get a bootloader,and manage to boot, the comp just hangs on the blank desktop screen, showing nothing except the wallpaper all this only when i am able to get past the partitioning wizard or use gparted to partition my HDD however it has saved me a lot of headache as well for some reason windows failed to boot and i had some critical files on the comp simply booted from live cd and copied them off to a USB, formatted and reinstalled windows have also used it to replace corrupted files in some windows installations will try the installation process again with 9.04, hopefully it will be successful config: P4 3.0Ghz with HT 512MB RAM ATI x200 integrated graphics intel D101GGC motherboard

    1. Re:a few bad experiences, but a lifesaver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the live CD is also very useful for browsing porn without leaving any traces, i think much safer than chromes incognito mode

  28. Rebooted back into windows ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ... so that I could google the errors that I got. Why did I reboot? Because none of my network devices worked.

    The last time I installed Linux, on a Dell laptop, Ubuntu this time, same damn thing.

    It'll be great when 100% of Linux installs can be done without a 2nd OS installed or another computer.

    You FOSS guys owe me 24 hours of my life back.

    1. Re:Rebooted back into windows ... by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Same can be said of windows, it's unlikely to support modern network cards out of the box unless you have a special oem version with drivers included... Linux actually stands a better chance of supporting your nic.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Rebooted back into windows ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux actually stands a better chance of supporting your nic."

      This is pretty far off from reality. No network card vendor will ship a card without a Windows driver, even if the driver already comes with Windows. You just can't be marketable without it unless you're specifically targeting the Mac theater, in which case it still wouldn't make sense to offer a Windows driver.

      If you want to count drivers that are only on the box, delivered via original install and online updates, both platforms will have broad NIC support, however there are many network cards that are proprietary and do not have Linux drivers available, or the Linux drivers are a hack and are not available in a timely manner; it's much better than it used to be, but it's still a reality.

      I think your idea that Linux stands a better chance of supporting your is ignoring reality. Windows may suffer from buggy drivers once in a while, but to find a card that isn't supported by Windows is about as rare as a mint condition AMC Gremlin.

  29. After install took hours trying to mount a floppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This did not inspire confidence, but I stuck with it anyway.

  30. Year of the Linux Desktop by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    I remember everything leading up to it. . .

    I was told after years of refinement, all the problems with Linux had finally been worked out. It was now easy to install, easy to use. Grandma could now use it. The buzz was everywhere, it was finally going to be Year Of The Linux Desktop.

    I'd given up my beloved Amiga, and I found that Windows seemed like a step backwards, so I was ready to try something different.

    So, I got the latest release of the most popular distro -- that would have been about Red Hat 4.0, I reckon -- and installed it on my home-built PC.

    I lost interest after I couldn't figure out how to change screen resolutions, and I couldn't get audio without recompiling a bunch of stuff.

    I ended up buying one of those newfangled "iMac" things from Beleaguered Apple.

  31. Sun Solaris and Fedora 2 by Warlord88 · · Score: 1
    My first touch with *nix systems when I started going to university (IIT Bombay). The central Computer Center had crappy old Sun Solaris systems and the hostel computer room had Fedora 2 systems which were a bit better.

    The Solaris systems almost didn't have any GUI, except for Firefox. We were searching for a topic for the CS 101 project and downloaded a compressed file in the process. I spent around an hour on going about how to extract the files from the archive. It was a nightmare. Later I took on to Linux pretty well, although never shifted to it full-time because of my addiction to PES.

  32. Command Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is my account of finding Linux, more specifically finding the command line.

  33. Swapped Floppies then Stared at Swarm by txoof · · Score: 1

    My first install was Slackware back in '95. I had no idea why I was installing it, but I knew that I would be 7337 if I had it. I spent countless hours trying to find enough blank and bad-sectorless floppies to rawrite the disk images. Then, on disk 11 of 12, I'd have to start all over because the floppy had was unreadable for some reason. That was awesome.

    Once it was installed, I had no idea what to do with it other than try to get X to run so I could watch the awesome Swarm screen saver I had seen at a friends house. I'm pretty sure that install only lasted a couple of weeks.

    --
    This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
  34. My First Linux Experience by LordKaT · · Score: 1

    Was a jump from Windows 98SE to Slackware 7.

    The horrible times trying to exit xconf in pico ... just wishing that "edit.com" would magically work in this new environment.

    I still have nightmares trying to get X working properly.

  35. my first time by sick_soul · · Score: 1

    I bought SUSE Linux together with a new computer in a small shop near my home.
    I specifically asked for it, since I was going to go to the university, and I needed a Unix-like system for my studies, to practice at home and work on assignments, without having to always go to the computer labs, where DEC machines and terminals were available.

    The guys in the shop installed the OS for me, so I had everything already working. No network connection btw.
    I started messing around, and soon discovered that a game called "nethack" was installed.
    It blew my mind.

  36. destroyed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I destroyed the install pretty quickly. This was 1997 installing MkLinux on a PowerMac 6100. I was trying to get X11 to work and I hosed the install with my non-knowledge of vi. Installs go much better these days.

    1. Re:destroyed it by Nerrd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ditto. It was either that exact machine for me, or whatever Powerbook I had at the time. I hardly remember which was first. I'd already been using FreeBSD and OpenBSD for a year or two on PC hardware by that point.

  37. Porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really can't believe you had to ask!

  38. Midnight Commander on a live Debian CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Midnight commander on a live Debian CD from the back of upgrading and repairing networks.

    It was the most magical thing ever. I could browse the windows 98 partition from the cd.

  39. 1996-1997 it was the year of desktop linux for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember installing a really early release of enlightenment on slackware on a pentium 1 laptop with 16mb of ram.

    I used it to type papers for college using dosemu and a pirated copy of wordperfect. I also started reading slashdot at that time, but forgot my login so I always post as anon nowadays.

  40. Ubuntu 6.06 by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

    My first linux install was when ubuntu 6.06 was pretty new. I guess I wanted to try something new on my laptop and a friend recommended it. I've been using Ubuntu on my laptop ever since. My home-server started out with debian for a while but I prefer to be a bit closer to the cutting edge so now it runs xubuntu.

  41. My first time with Linux by Gigiya · · Score: 1

    I first spent a few days trying to find the right drivers, then I gave up and reverted to Windows. I tried again five years later with Ubuntu and had even more driver problems!

  42. Error: Noobtastic Failure At... by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1

    I had tried SUSE Linux 7.1 for the first time and I was so enthusiastic about it I bought a copy, rushed home to install it on my PC and went about setting up the partitions manually.

    I'd already put three Windows partitions on that machine, so of course I was an expert in partitioning. What could possibly go wrong?

    What went wrong was that I entered the same value for the end of one partition and the start of the next (like: 5000, 5000 when it should have been 5000, 5001) and I lost access to all three Windows partitions.

    Shortly afterwards, I remembered I had a college project on one of those partitions. :(

  43. Slackware Web Server by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I set up a webserver with Slackware. In 1994, on a 486 (DX50!). Sure beat the proprietary BSDi, even though I preferred BSD (which we ran as SunOS4). Because Usenet was full of Linux people who not only happily answered technical questions, but actually knew what they were talking about most of the time, for free.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  44. Corel, Ubuntu, Ubuntu again by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1
    1. Tried to start Corel Linux on an old machine. It didn't work. Mothballed it.
    2. Installed Ubuntu Breezy (5.10) in dual-boot with Windows XP. Worked fine, apart from the fact the wireless card wouldn't work. It was wiped with the next install of Windows.
    3. Installed Ubuntu 7.10 on my netbook to replace the awful Xandros. It's since found its way on to my main desktop machine (triple-booting with Fedora 10 and Windows 7) and dual-booting with Vista on my (very non-techie) parents' machine.

    Things have improved since the old days... although I did recently dig out a mid-90s laptop and install Debian 1.1 on it. It took less than two hours with a stack of floppies and some perseverance with dd on the host machine. I was pleasantly surprised: the TUI was incredibly easy to use for its time.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:Corel, Ubuntu, Ubuntu again by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Yeah - to be honest I'm often baffled at people who say installation is much easier than it used to be. My first install was SuSE 7.0, I think, and I installed it because I was broke and couldn't afford Windows at retail. It was extremely easy; I didn't change a single option, the monitor more or less sorted itself out (all I had to do was hit the magical "auto" button on the monitor to perfect it), and sound worked just fine. Dial-up configured itself, and I was on the net minutes after first booting up. I didn't install a new distro from scratch for some years, though I installed KDE 3.0 from source, rolled my own kernel, and generally upgraded bits and pieces along the way. I even got a broadband USB modem working with very little effort. Frankly, Ubuntu is more work than that install was.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  45. Who know what distro by Cthefuture · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1993
    386DX40
    4 MB of very expensive RAM
    345 MB Maxtor hard-drive
    Stack of floppies that had been downloaded over BBS/FidoNet with a 14.4 kbps telephone modem
    Linux kernel version was something like 0.97 or so.

    I'm not sure if my first try was with Slackware, SLS, or who knows what.

    It was at that time that I fell in love with the UNIX way of doing things. It was like an OS written just for programmers.

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:Who know what distro by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Stack of floppies that had been downloaded over BBS/FidoNet with a 14.4 kbps telephone modem Linux kernel version was something like 0.97 or so.

      Welcome to the club! :)

      I'm not sure if my first try was with Slackware, SLS, or who knows what.

      Yggdrasil??? :)

      (Actually, Yggdrasil kicked ass: it was the first distro I ever saw that automagically installed X and ran it first shot, which was cool, back in 94-95).

    2. Re:Who know what distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds very similar to my experience.

      I first heard about Linux around 1992 and downloaded a boot/root floppy combo. It kernel panic'ed on boot due to my cheap 386 motherboard not supporting NMI. I later got it running after upgrading to a 486.

      I emailed Linus about the problem with the kernel panic on the 386 and within about 24 hours he responded with a reply that was something to the effect of "sorry, but you're out of luck". I wish I'd have kept that email now...

      The earliest kernel I remember using was 0.97. Then SLS came along and that was my first real distro. Later I tried Slackware and it was hot stuff for back then.

      Anyway, I tried Linux initially so I could run a UN*X system on my own computer (for programming work). The university computer labs had crappy hours and even crappier Sun workstations.

    3. Re:Who know what distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      486DX2/66
      16 mb ram
      1 gig hdd
      Turbo Linux 6

      managed to make my swap partion way too small, so the first thing i did is to reinstall with a bigger swap, then configure X11 by hand to work with my old 2 mb video card. Fun times...

    4. Re:Who know what distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much my situation, 1993, AMD -386-40, 1 Meg RAM, 40 MB HD. I was using Linux 0.99 pl 13. (Patch Level 13).

      The first thing I did with Linux was: try to get it to boot. :-)

    5. Re:Who know what distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too - wow what a rush... It took me and a friend almost 3 days to get it all compiled including the X windows system. We started it and I have been into Linux ever since.

  46. October 1992 MCC interim release by c0manche · · Score: 1

    My first foray into linux was the MCC interim release on October 1992 whilst at Manchester University. I installed it on a 40Meg Partition on my 386DX25 and the reason was to allow me to do the programming course works without been tied to going into the Unix computer lab. I still remember using 0.95 of the linux kernel and remember the excitement on the course when 1.0 of the linux kernel was released. Ah them were the days. Memories..............

  47. LinuxPPC 2000... yes it was painful by zedwards · · Score: 1

    I was tempted by a linuxppc cd in the computer store and thought I would check it out for my old iMac. I remember being horrified by getting 8 colors when first booting up. I don't know how many hours it took for my to figure things out (using lynx in console mode), but eventually I moved on up to compiling gentoo and now settling for xubuntu.

  48. Yggdrasil by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

    That was 92 or 93, I guess, I was entering high school. Pre-1.0 kernel.

    Installed, and tried to connect to my bbs. What, do I need to use the terminal do connect and use? Terminal was for REXX stuff! No BlueWave?

    So I went back to OS/2 and ZOC, I guess.

    1. Re:Yggdrasil by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I had tried pre Yggdrasil, with limited success. Mostly as a hobby. In 93 or so, I got a full installation of Yggdrasil running (no x-windows, I didn't have a compatible graphics card/monitor).

      I did get a system functional enough to take a course on C at the local Jr. College (prior to returing for my masters in Physics). Learned a lot about makefiles, dependencies and all the other stuff that the students who were using Turbo C were shielded from.

      Sadly, I gave up shortly there after. I built a firewall box that ran some early version of Redhat (2? 3?) that was bulletproof, but finally it couldn't be updated (I brought it back to life with a version 5 Install). It finally was replaced by a firewall appliance (and a couple others since).

      Now I am a Mac person. 4 between my Wife and I. I am also strange, as I prefer Vista to XP for my work laptop. It just works better for me than XP ever did (especially its support for multiple screens. XP licks balls in that situation).

      Geoff

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  49. That's an easy one by erroneus · · Score: 1

    My first Linux was used as a dialup router. Though no one TOLD me I could do this, I somehow knew Linux of the day was perfectly capable of doing it.

    At the time, Windows couldn't do it. It was the era of Windows 3.11 for workgroups and Windows95. I had more than one machine and I wanted not only to share data between the two machines, but also have both machines on the internet. Dialup was the only method of access to me at the time and I couldn't have one machine on the net and communication with the other machine or use its shared printer or anything useful at the same time. I gave pizza and alcohol to a minor to get him to show me how this is done. (I learn best by example) And once we had the machine running, it was dialing out to the internet and would redial on disconnection and it was awesome.

    I gradually expanded the capability of the dialup router to include other server functions and my knowledge grew with it. Back in those days, kernel hacking and patching was the norm and so I found myself doing that as well.

    My first experience with anything GUI on Linux was abysmal. It was slow and crappy and "felt wrong." Back in those days, I used my weakest hardware for Linux and my best for Windows. (Today that situation is reversed.) I didn't seriously use Linux for anything desktop until many years later and even then it was secondary to Windows because of the asian language support. But one day that changed too.

  50. none by Krommenaas · · Score: 1

    my first experience with Linux was that it didn't work. my second, third, fourth and fifth experiences, each with about a year between them and the last one Ubunti 08.04, were all the same. every time you read that Linux has now become so easy it works out of the box, and yet every time on my hardware (which changes over time) there is some component that just doesn't work (unless you're already a Linux adept or are prepared to invest hours of your time) - usually the wireless network. that's what the Linux experiene is like for me, and for many other people I bet.

    1. Re:none by Gigiya · · Score: 1

      Yep, definitely has been like that.

    2. Re:none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was completely without command line experience when my friend insisted I try dual-booting gentoo . . . and of course he left me without a windowing system and I never used it more than a few times.

      After that I have installed it in VMs so I can have the same configuration as other machines. Only a few months ago did I actually put linux as the main OS on one computer -- my backup. It's great for development, but I only use it if I want the extra RAM. OS X has served my needs so well that I just don't really require anything else.

      When my mac died, I went to the linux backup machine. Sure, I could get my programming done, but when it came to anything media it was much easier to just boot up my XP VM and use that. I now take OS X less for granted than I did before.

    3. Re:none by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      that's what the Linux experiene is like for me, and for many other people I bet.

      'Tis a pity. Have you filed a bug report with the distro maintainer?

  51. I tried to connect with modem by dominious · · Score: 1

    I remember having installed Suse 5.1 and was trying to connect with a 33.6k modem. Good old times with pppd :)

  52. Boot Magazine by djroketboy · · Score: 1

    Mine was the with Slackware, i have no idea which version; but it came with the Boot magazine CD. I remember it was almost like the old C64 days of basic, having to type in lot's of command to get it to work... From there I moved to Red Hat, and have loved Linux ever since :)

  53. What I've done first? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Answer: Installing.

    And then?

    Installing.

    Well, and then?

    Well... installing. Then Portage broke.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  54. Jumped from HPUX by drjohnretired · · Score: 1

    In 1992, we had ultrasonic inspection software running under HPUX. The improving performance of PCs made the HP hardware and HPUX licence way over priced. Others in our group had lost a half year trying to port to Windows. I ported the entire application to Redhat 4.2 in about a week and never looked back.

  55. The first thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I scream as my files refuse to unpack, at the sarcastic answers of linux forum people when i ask how, then I reinstall Windows. Im trying Ubuntu this time though!

  56. "Byte-Compling EMACS" by n0dna · · Score: 1

    For about 11 hours, iirc.

    Then the installer continued...

    1. Re:"Byte-Compling EMACS" by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      And gcc. Don't forget the bootstrap recompilation issues for gcc: you needed a _lot_ of very expensive disk space to recompile gcc.

  57. I believe by lattyware · · Score: 1

    I installed SUSE the first time. Mucked around a bit, liked it, but went back to Windows, due to not wanting to spend time setting it up.
    It took Ubuntu being released for me to finally up and move. It really was a turning point in being usable the moment you started it.
    Ironically, I now run Arch, which took ages to set up.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    1. Re:I believe by weicco · · Score: 1

      SUSE was my first experience also.

      First thing was that I noticed that X didn't start. It threw some error messages to my face so I fired up my other PC and altavistad (Google wasn't around back then IIRC) and it took some hours to get it working. It was something about hand editing config files. Funny thing that after that every time I install Linux (which is pretty rare nowadays) I have to go through the same exercise :)

      Next I find out that sounds aren't working. I could live with that because I had a really nice stereo system back.

      But what was real showstopper was that I couldn't get my 56K modem working. I had a phoneline and internet access which I paid money for and which I couldn't use. I don't care whose fault it was that I couldn't access internet but I had to reformat the whole thing and install back Windows 98 to get that working.

      So my first experience with Linux wasn't so great :(

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
  58. See Linux Safari Blog :) by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, I did everything. Got my first 32 bit PC (386DX25) and immediately put Slackware 2 on it. Not my first Unix though, even 32-bit; I'd had a 3/260 with 4.1.1 which I upgraded to a 4/260 with 4.1.3. BSD-based SunOS, how I loved thee.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  59. Mandrake 7 or 8 by ssintercept · · Score: 1

    i actually payed like $20 for it at bestbuy or comp usa. the first thing i tried was to do was get a working modem (i didnt know about winmodem problems back then-should have rtfm).

    and becuase i was too clueless to get that resolved-XP went back in to satisfy the then girlfriends chatroom obsession...

    --
    "You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."-- Fred Hampton
    1. Re:Mandrake 7 or 8 by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      I started with Mandrake 7.2 on my compaq laptop. After many problems and trying Mandrake 8.0 I eventually gave up and installed Gentoo. I got it installed on my desktop at home too and ran it there for, well up until I upgraded to a new system so it was for like 6 years or so. Finally I had a system that could play UT2004 and NWN. A couple of years ago my brother and I built a 64-bit system with Gentoo and put it in a colo facility and it has been running ever since.

      At work we principally use SLES and OpenSUSE but my l337 linux si11z learned from Gentoo remain with me. Of course I have been an OpenBSD fan and user since 1999 when I had to get a corporate VPN setup on a zero dollar budget at a previous job. Scraped some old workstation parts together with two NICs and voila had our firewall and VPN back to HQ. Then with our Gentoo web server at the office (co-worker was also a Gentoo fan) we wrote an apache/python web services app. Lots of memories there.

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  60. Compared it to HURD by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    I did an early testdrive on an old 486/33 box, to compare it to HURD's absolutely broken installation toolkit. It was awkward compared to modern distros, certainly, but the fact that it installed and gave me a full GNU toolchain was very exciting. It wasn't stable enough yet for business operation, but the fact that the kernel did what it needed to do in a basic install was the missing component of full free software distributions, and this was very exciting for political and business reasons.

  61. Typing YES by Rigrig · · Score: 1

    My first experience with linux was playing around with Mandrake, and within half an hour I learned having to type 'YES' (completely, in caps) means I probably don't know what I'm doing and should stop doing it right now.

    (Yes, of course I typed it anyway and had to reinstall :p)

    --
    **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
  62. My first time? by simonharvey · · Score: 1

    The first memory that I had was trying to login as the administrator.

    Nobody told me that the root account login name was root.

    I went back to Windows 95 after that.

    _________________
    Simon

  63. I built an ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1998, a friend was buying a new computer and had a few parts available from his old system:

    Pentium I 133Mhz
    128MB RAM

    we bought an 8GB drive, and bought a boxed copy of Red Hat 5.2 (because we needed SSL and you couldn't download SSL then, or so we thought).

    We configured the server and co-located it with a local ISP. We ended up with 20 servers and 10 employees before hitting the wall in 2002 and selling for pennies on the dollar.

    I'm still running my own servers, but now I used dedicated servers spread out at various ISPs. Not much has changed, though.

  64. Fidonet by Minupla · · Score: 1

    I set up a UUCP Fidonet gateway. Which is probably not the most normal thing.... this was back in 92 though, when installing X meant a bunch of extra 1.44MB floppies!

    Min

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    1. Re:Fidonet by Minupla · · Score: 1

      I believe it was on a 286 and I was running a distro that doesn't exist anymore - Softlanding Software (SLS).

      Those were the days... I remember trying to set up a dumb terminal off the serial port. I kept getting "inittab respawning too fast"... so I figured I'd delete inittab and recopy it.... don't try that at home kiddies!

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    2. Re:Fidonet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same distro for me: Softlanding (SLS?) around 93-94(?). I ordered the floppies from someone in Canada - it was a woman working from home with kids crying in the background. It was about 30 disks. The best part: I expense reported it. I think I still have the receipt somewhere.

      What I first did with it? Tried to get X to work. Unsuccessfully.

  65. My story by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

    My first experience was with HP-UX in November 1995 at the University lab. I remember thinking that the hardware looks ancient, the command line didn't accept "dir" and the concept of moving files to rename them was a little odd. I do remember enjoying the possible window managers (fvwm95 was the one of choice in the end) and using "--display" to lock other peoples terminals or display hundreds of xeyes.

    My first experience of Linux was some ancient version of Slackware a uni friend (Pete) loaded onto his PC in the dorms in 1996. They were owned by the uni and close to the labs, so it had wired access to every room. Outside of the city (where the rest of the digs were) you didn't get such luxury. It was called "Cameron" (after Diaz, I think) and had the IP address 138.253.85.33 which, oddly, is ingrained in my head to this day as it was the only way we could telnet to it.

    We persuaded him to keep it running as a server and even managed to load an ewtoo based talker onto there. Although it was always quite amusing that he had to shut it down a couple of evenings a week to boot into Windows so he could write his dissertation.

    My first personal experience of Linux was loading Redhat 5.2 onto my brand new Pentium 133 which I bought for the second year. It was in a shared house in Liverpool that I dual booted Windows 95 and Redhat - eventually moving on to triple boot NT4, Windows 95 (for games) and Redhat for uni work. I remember editing /etc/fstab to get the various partitions to be seen - something we take for granted now.

    I stuck with Redhat for a couple of years before realising that I didn't boot into Linux often enough to make it worthwhile. I dabbled with Ubuntu on an ancient IBM laptop but it never really worked properly. These days I find that XP and Cygwin does everything I need. At some point, I may buy a Mac.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  66. built my music library by shibashaba · · Score: 1

    The very first time I used linux was in the @Home days. Inside the box with the cable modem was a turbolinux install cd, it was the very first I had heard of linux. Tried installing it, but the installer locked up. There was some incompatibility with my motherboard.

    A couple years later I was completely bored with windows, having to reinstall it every couple weeks(this was win98). Every few weeks the driver for my ide controller would fail leaving me cdromless. On top of that, I was trying to rip all my cds to my hard drive. I had three cdroms and was determined to have all of them going at the same time. I could never get all three to work for longer than ten minutes at a time. Between that, and massive gnutella downloads going at the same time my hard drive would become so horribly fragmented that I couldn't even view the contents of a directory.

    In absolute boredom as I had no use for my computer running windows, I downloaded Mandrake(the first choice at linux.com). It installed in 10 minutes and detected all my hardware perfectly. Contrasting with windows, everytime I reinstalled I had to spend hours loading up drivers.

    I was able to rip all my music in three days. After this was completed without incident I stared at my computer for about 4 weeks trying to figure out what to do. I had spent so many years just fixing Windows that I had no idea what to do with a computer that actually just worked.

    I've never looked back, or missed any of the software that only runs on windows. Whenever friends and family ask me for advice, I just tell them I don't use windows anymore and don't know.

    --
    ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
  67. The year is late 1993 by Der+PC · · Score: 1

    I lived in Sweden, which at the time didn't have any public internet on offer. I got a couple of boxes of diskettes mailed from a friend of mine who lived in anouther country. If I remember correctly, the kernel version was 0.98.

    I installed it, used it and havn't really looked back since, until 2002/2003 I defected to Apple. They have a monolithic GDI. Something Linux sorely lacks.

    The X-Server has lived its lifetime. It's time to kill it off, and bring something that actually brings the Linux graphical front end into the present time. (And before you bash me, no, servers should NOT be running a graphics server)

    --
    This signature is DRM protected. By the DMCA, you are not allowed to counteract or oppose to it.
    1. Re:The year is late 1993 by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      The X-Server has lived its lifetime. It's time to kill it off, and bring something that actually brings the Linux graphical front end into the present time.

      0) Have you ever used KDE 4.2?
      1) What do you suggest as a replacement for X11R7?
      2) What aspects of X11R7 are holding the Linux GUI and/or desktop back?

    2. Re:The year is late 1993 by Der+PC · · Score: 1

      1) Yes, of course I have, and No, it's not the holy grail you were looking for. KDE isn't the X-Server, it's a layer _on_top_ of the Xserver, which brings us to the next point
      2) Remove the network layer from the X-Server, combine and compact the GDI to focus on speed and simplicity. The GDI should worry ONLY on how to actually talk to the graphics hardware, not how to communicate to some remote client. For what it's worth, Apple and to some rather large extent, Microsoft, are doing it right. This part at least.
      3) Big, sluggish, unneccessarily complex X-Server (and to an extent too many choices of desktops).

      What Linux _NEEDS_ is to cut down on old fat. Streamlining the X-Server (or writing a new one from scratch) that actually worries about the graphics aspect and ignores backwards compatibility with awkward graphics-transport protocols - focuses on speed and simplicity.

      Of course you can do all of what you can in MacOS and Windows on a Linux box - at least as far as the eye-candy goes, but at the cost of speed and fuctionality - which really isn't what Linux needs, not since it used to be the speediest kid on the block.

      The X-Server was already a dinosaur in the 90's, and it still is, since it doesn't matter for how long you polish a turd, it'll still be one when your'e over.

      --
      This signature is DRM protected. By the DMCA, you are not allowed to counteract or oppose to it.
    3. Re:The year is late 1993 by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      1) Yes, of course I have, and No, it's not the holy grail you were looking for. KDE isn't the X-Server, it's a layer _on_top_ of the Xserver...

      Oh, I know this. It is, however, a desktop environment that -in many ways- rivals anything that's coming out of Redmond or Cupertino.

      2) Remove the network layer from the X-Server, combine and compact the GDI to focus on speed and simplicity. The GDI should worry ONLY on how to actually talk to the graphics hardware

      a) What is the GDI? The I've only ever seen this acronym officially used when describing an old graphics API for MS Windows.
      b) You do know that work that's being done with "unprivileged X" and kernel modesetting is making it so's X doesn't have to manage the hardware anymore?
      c) Do you have benchmarks that demonstrate that X's network transparency harms performance on local clients that utilize the MIT Shared Memory extension? [0] Do you have any benchmarks which compare basic operations under WIN32, Cocoa, and X11?

      3) Big, sluggish, unneccessarily complex X-Server...

      This is a continuation of point 2. Do you have benchmarks or design insights to support your claims?

      Of course you can do all of what you can in MacOS and Windows on a Linux box - at least as far as the eye-candy goes, but at the cost of speed and fuctionality

      What hardware and driver revisions did you use KDE 4.2 on? The only *performance* bug that i've found with 3D accell is bouncing between redirected and unredirected mode when using Firefox in fullscreen. I'm running on an AGP R420 (Radeon X800) with xf86-video-ati-6.12.2.

      [0] This extension has been available since X11R5, which was released in 1991.

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. I'll Never Forget by Wylde+Stile · · Score: 1

    Lets just say early '90s running Slackware using 3 ZyXEL modems and Vgetty for my home office voicemail system.

  70. Kind of Ironic by ZosX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The whole point of the article is to tell what he did with linux when he first installed it. I read the whole article and he never did anything! I was waiting to hear that he actually did something with this linux install other than just getting it to run. No mention of any apps he checked out, how he felt about the desktop, nothing. I mean, what entirely is the point of this article? "I installed linux, got it to run, and never looked back." Whoopdeedoo. For the record, I first started out with debian and would always be stuck installing from floppies and then grabbing packages with a modem. Since I had older hardware (even then at the time) BASH was my desktop and then ZSH for a period of time. I always thought that textmode linux rocked (I still do) and is probably one of the strongest features of UNIX in general. I guess the first thing I ran was telnet, so I could get on a shell and irc for a while. See, this guy installed linux in 2001, and I've been using it off and on since, what 1997? Debian has always been my favorite distro by far and I've always liked Ubuntu by extension.

    1. Re:Kind of Ironic by hitmark · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article, you would have noticed that this "guy" has a husband. "He" is probably a "she."

    3. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might have escaped your notice that the author of TFA is a woman. I would have thought all the references to "my boyfriend" and "my husband" might have tipped you off.

    4. Re:Kind of Ironic by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I did read that and then totally missed it. Whoops. I fail. Still doesn't make it any less of a crappy article. :P

    5. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, I first started out with debian and would always be stuck installing from floppies and then grabbing packages with a modem.

      I sat back and watched guys like you until I figured going to Linux would be painless. I started with home computers in 1978, so the usual CP/M -> Amiga (sigh) -> Win. Add a little Unix account time, and a brief experience with beige Mac (ick). Final Win was 98, which I knew all the tricks for, but it couldn't do GoogleEarth and no way I was going XP, so... welcome to Ubuntu.

      And what did I do First? Everything. I waited so long because I was well past wanting to fiddle with an OS anymore; I was about using apps. Ubuntu mostly delivered that promise (thank god I already knew CLI) and I only booted the Win partition for Word for writing contracts.

      So thanks, folks -- devs and early adopters. For me the year of the Linux Desktop was four years ago.

    6. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course *he* didn't do anything. TFA was written by a *she*.

    7. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can say with certainty the first thing I did when I got linux to run was run lynx. The second thing was get connected to concentric research BBS over minicom.

    8. Re:Kind of Ironic by guest · · Score: 1

      My experience was the same as the author's. In 1998 or 1999 I'd heard a lot about Linux so I decided to do my own install. I used a Suse disk that a friend had at work. It took a while to get through the install, and once I did I looked at the desktop, said, "This is kind of ugly" and then tried to figure out what I wanted to do next. I didn't have a good answer.

      At the time I think a lot of people were curious about what Linux could do, but didn't have a real good idea of what they wanted to do with it, and for me at least it wasn't ready for the desktop. Flash forward a year or two and I had a need for a NAT box, and Windows wasn't cutting it. My previous Linux install experience gave me the confidence to try Linux in that capacity, as I got more comfortable with it I started using it in more places.

      --
      pw:secret
    9. Re:Kind of Ironic by fdrebin · · Score: 1

      The whole point of the article is to tell what he did with linux when he first installed it.

      OK, you want real life events. What I did was to try to port Mallinckrodt CTN software (Central Test Node - DICOM software) - see http://erl.wustl.edu/research/dicom/ctn.html if you're into that sort of thing.

      Around 1994, early Slackware IIRC. I got enough pieces of it to work for my immediate needs, which was to start testing DICOM software my company was writing. In those days it was only running on Solaris, maybe Irix, HP-UX... don't recall, it was a while ago.

      --
      Stupidity... has a habit of getting its way.
    10. Re:Kind of Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so he became a she, it's something.

  71. Summer of '07 by plasmidmap · · Score: 1

    Learned to convert integer to string
    R command line was heaven
    Typing till my fingers were red
    It was the summer of 2007

    Installed Dapper Drake for school
    For a project that was real hard
    Set up gedit for typesetting
    LaTeX documents look best by far

    Oh when I look back now
    Hardware problems seemed to take for ever
    And if I'd had the choice
    I would not have bought a Broadcom wireless card
    Those were the best days of my life

    Why won't my mp3 files play?
    Why do I have to apt-get and then install?
    I can't figure out how to set my resolution
    Gotta learn this system by fall

    Tedious tasks made fast
    By learning how to script in bash
    But Nautilus freezes on me
    Every time I open the Trash!
    Those were the best days of my life
    Back in the summer of 2007

    Googling errors messages
    Ubuntu community helpful
    I needed to reinstall
    I guess nothing can last forever, forever, no

    And now at version 9.04
    Look at everything that's come and gone
    Sometimes when I think about ol' 6.06
    Wonder how I stuck with it so long

    Now my desktop runs only Ubuntu
    But my laptop still dualboots Vista
    Once projector support is 100%
    Then I'll say hasta la vista

    These are the best days of my life
    It's the summer of 2009

    1. Re:Summer of '07 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thats pretty good. Except now I've got that song stuck in my head.

  72. "Boot disk" and "Root disk" by Fished · · Score: 1

    My first time running Linux was before the whole concept of "distributions" had even really caught hold. Back then, you downloaded a "boot disk" (a floppy disk that contained the kernel) and a "root disk" (a second floppy containing a few basic UNIX utilities.) If you wanted a hard drive installation, you used this to format your hard drive, then copied the contents of the root disk over to the hard drive over. This was before LILO, so booting off the hard drive was not supported.

    Now, this was not the Linux we have today. No X-windows. No networking. No kernel modules. Driver support was ridiculously limited. But it was the first free Linux I'd ever found, and I was psyched to have it.

    Then along came a couple of distros and this all began to change very fast. First distro I ever used was "SLS". (There was another one, IIRC, called "MLM" or something like that. But I never used it.) SLS was a lot like Slackware or, more accurately, Slackware is a lot like SLS--originally, Slackware was just an extention of some of SLS's basic concepts.

    One thing all these early distros had in common was they came on floppies. Yes, Virginia, 1.44MB floppies. In fact, if I remember right, I think SLS would even work on 1.2MB 5.25" floppies. This was before CDR's were readily available, and I remember ... not fondly ... sitting in the Sun lab at college with literally 30-40 floppies downloading the latest Slackware, one disk at a time. And if one floppy had one fault on it, you had to go back to school the next day and redownload the image. Pain in the ass doesn't even begin to cover it.

    Eventually I abandoned Slackware for Redhat, which I stuck with until Redhat abandoned being free for the whole Fedora nightmare. I found Fedora to be junk, so I decided to try Debian, as I had been meaning to do for years. Tried Debian, loved it. Then eventually switched to Ubuntu as a more "polished" version of Debian.

    Man I feel old. I guess I've been using Linux for over 15 years now. Wow.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:"Boot disk" and "Root disk" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I started a little later (slack 2) but did the same floppy shuffle (A, N, D, and X sets. all would install into 120MB with 8MB used for swap, no joke... except maybe not the whole X set, either.) In slack you could start with A and N if you had the means to finish your download at home; just download the tarballs. I went through the same RedHate shuffle you did, but I left earlier (6.1 being about the last redhat worth using, IMNSHO.) Also had a stint on Caldera Network Desktop, back when Motif was still relevant. (You needed it just for xv!)

      Anyway, slackware had a boot and root too, IIRC... but it also had installer sets.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:"Boot disk" and "Root disk" by julesh · · Score: 1

      This was before LILO, so booting off the hard drive was not supported.

      You don't need LILO to boot off hard drive. Here's how you make it work: create a small partition, and dd your kernel image onto it. Use the standard tools (I forget what they were called, but you used 'em when you were making boot floppies to customize the kernel command line) to point it at your root partition. fdisk to make the kernel partition bootable. Should work identically to a boot floppy, only without needing the floppy.

      Of course, dual booting might be an issue...

    3. Re:"Boot disk" and "Root disk" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why *do* people switch to Ubuntu after Debian? I went the other way, altho after 6months of ubuntu I was sick of it and had learned enough about Debian to make the switch. Debian is just better than Ubuntu for my money...fewer bugs and less bloat, but YMMV of course.

  73. Slackware 10 by KDingo · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately I don't have any experiences like the OP but for me it was Slackware 10. I think I chose this as I had read it was good for learning the in and outs of linux... I didn't feel like trying anything else so I stayed with it for a while before switching back to windows when I got into college. So I had the general impression anything on linux to install anything you had to download the tarball do the "./configure", "make", "make install" ritual, and run startx for the GUI. I thought it was quite retro.

    Finally I made the jump when I moved across the country 3 years ago; I had nothing so I decided on openSUSE 10 and have been pretty happy with it since. I also work with CentOS systems so I'm pretty much a RedHat person.

  74. Kernel compile by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Red Hat 6.0 in August/September 1999. I don't remember the very first things I did, but after about a week I recompiled the kernel succesfully. I also recall thinking that, during that one week with Linux, I learned more about computers than I'd done during the many years with DOS and Windows before that.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  75. Cleaned my bathroom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, seriously.

  76. Replace broken Windoz boxin. by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    I first used Linux to replace the RADIUS server that would crash on a Win NT. One by one most of our ISP functions failed on Windoz and were migrated to Linux. The Linux boxes didn't break. This started in 1996.

  77. Screaming tantrums by FreakyGreenLeaky · · Score: 1

    My biggest problem was trying to get the kernel (0.x?) to recognise my bloody CDROM drive... (lots of screaming tantrums, bi-polar inducing maniacal bashing of keyboard resulting in a shower of pop-corn-keys, tears and gnashing of teeth down to the pulp, but fuckit, I rabidly refused to give up and kept returning for more).

    I remember oscillating between eye-twitching dopamine drenched euphoria when something worked, and fuck-this-shit frustration.

    I vividly remember finally (many, many weeks later) getting X (openwin?) to run properly and setting up my white-on-black terminals with a nice font (lucida-sans?) so it looked as close as possible to SUN's terminals (which was my first exp with UNIX).

    ahh, then GCC. It was such a pleasure using a decent C compiler (for free). I eventually managed to compile GCC on Solaris (SUNOS/SPARCstation). I recall all the compiled binaries were smaller (stripped), faster and compiled quicker compared to SUN's C compiler.

    Glory days.

  78. gcc HelloWorld.c by f0dder · · Score: 1

    #include <stdio.h>
    void main(){
    printf("hello world!\n");
    }

  79. My first time by prefec2 · · Score: 2

    It was 1994. I was using OS/2 on my machine at that time. At university we had DEC Ultrix ans OSF and so I configured my OS/2 in a way so it would look similar to those machines (xeyes,xbiff etc). Then a friend told me that there was something new available, a slackware distribution lying around on the universities FTP server. So I got there with 50 floppies and copied images.

    These Ultirx machines were a real mess, because copying to a floppy was always successful and errors were suppressed. And a quick verify would not reread the floppy. So you had to remove the floppy fill another and then go back and do the check.

    But after a week I had a working linux at home and was able to have the exact same feeling. I could use gcc and there was really documentation available for everything. LaTeX, emacs all in their nativ environment. And yes it was able to use this new thing called internet via modem. It was cool.

    My flat mate envied me because his WfW was not so good at it. Especially when he saw that I can use my computer as a gateway for his machine. However, he didn't switch to Linux, which was very strange for a computer science student in those days. All the good guys tried it out and the wimps didn't. ;-)

    In those days spirits were brave, the stakes were high, men were real men, women were real women and small furry creatures from Alpha Centuari were real small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri.

    And yes, people tried to talk about important things on the net, like router setups and the best bars in New Zealand even though they never left their country. But nowadays every jerk is able to surf the web. It is a tragedy.

  80. Knoppix by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    I downloaded a Knoppix 3.3 CD one week while I had access to decent bandwidth.

    Then I played Frozen Bubble for hours, until I got kicked off the PC.

  81. Slackware then Redhat; Minix before that by wrmrxxx · · Score: 1

    My first Linux encounter was with Slackware. A friend had it on 5 1/4 inch floppies, and showed me an installation. I was interested, but didn't see it as practical for me compared to DOS and Windows. I didn't switch my own computer over until quite a few years later when I got Redhat on CD from a computer swap meet - I have no idea what version it was, but it was a few years before Fedora Core. Over the years I've gradually changed from being interested in every technical detail and willing to configure endlessly to just wanting something that works - now I'm annoyed if a distro doesn't just automatically detect and work with all my hardware. I use Ubuntu at home and at work, and I'm still impressed by how smooth it all is.

    My first experience with a Unix like OS running on a PC was a then new OS called Minix. The lecturer for our Operating Systems subject at uni showed it to the class and encouraged us to try it out. I looked at it and it thought it was cool, but that was about all.

  82. Fedora by ZankerH · · Score: 1

    A friend had me try fedora a couple of days before the core 3 release. Back then, I only used PCs for web and email (which it worked perfectly for), then, after learning more about Linux and computers in general, I've been distro-hopping for a while before settling on Debian and Arch.

  83. told everyone, so I could join the elitist circle by spacefem · · Score: 1

    I kinda installed linux because it was cool.

    After that I had no idea what to do with it... run open office? Learn Perl? I ended up getting WAY more into GIMP than I thought I would, that's what took up most of my time, I had to make myself cool new penguin-y backgrounds.

  84. Kernel 0.95a... by Temkin · · Score: 1

    I downloaded it to 5.25 inch floppy from "tsx-11" using a whole row of computers in the south-sci computer lab at CSU Hayward. Having been previously jaded by waiting several years for the 386BSD project to be useable, I had low expectations.

    I was pleasantly surprised. 0.95b brought in the parallel port driver, and I could make my printer work. DOS got ditched.

    By 0.97 I was writing science software, and needed a more polished platform. I bought a used Sun and moved on. I checked in now and again, but never recaptured the thrill of those 0.95 - 0.96 kernels. It took Linux another 10 years to catch Solaris. Now days I use Centos & Ubuntu for desktop and commodity server duty, and only reach for Solaris for large high-scale server applications.

  85. Not sure, but my first real desktop was for music by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Not anything complex, just for playing my MP3's without freezes or crashes when playing games on my windows machine. Old PC with linux, as I learned more and more it more and more became my desktop. Browser that didn't crash. Text-editor that didn't crash. P2P that didn't crash.

    The odd thing? I am typing this on Vista but in a NXclient running on a linux machine. It saves the space of two desktops, gives me big screen access to my old linux machine and even if Vista crashes NXclient every now and then, it just resumes.

    Vista, you still stuck. Linux just keeps getting better and better. (Why Vista? Needed 64bit for 8gig of memory and DX10 as well)

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  86. Knoppix live CDs; then Ubuntu by badpazzword · · Score: 1

    Ok, that wasn't my first meet up with Linux. I had tried MANY live CDs of KDE3 based live distro which were cool to play with (I enjoyed Enigma) but took an entire day to customize and by the time I had it tweaked to my likings the day was over and I had to shut down the computer.

    A few yearI tried Ubuntu 7.04 and saw Gnome. The first impression was negative: so little room for tinkering and configuration... then I realised that it actually a good thing, I just liked the look and feel of the desktop. However that wasn't enough yet.

    Then I found out about this compiz thing... nice but not a deal sealer.

    Finally I discovered apt. Oh My Holy God. That blew my socks off. A few weeks later I finally figured out how to resize the NTFS partition (for some reason gparted didn't want to help me) and installed it.

    Now I use as much Windows (XP) as much Ubuntu (9.04 since alpha6). The ratio has been swinging, but each side of the dualboot has its perks and it's nice to be able to get the best of the two.

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  87. 40 floppies, SLS 0.96 and a 386sx in 1992 by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Mostly used for connecting to various online services. Though it was really nice to have something which didn't crash on an hourly basis.
     

    --
    Deleted
  88. Homework by LunarEffect · · Score: 1

    This thread actually made me walk over to my cd cupboard. I am now holding a 6-year-old SuSE Linux Professional 8.2 box in my hands. A friend, an IT Professional gave it to me, cos he no longer needed it. At that time I used it mainly to do my homework on, with Windows for gaming. So yeah, the first thing I did on Linux was my homework ^^

  89. linux and dating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started using linux 6+ years ago because the computer I was assigned to when I started grad school was a debian machine. Not bad, had some bugs. It reminded me of my first date, I didn't ask it to do anything it didn't want to do and it didn't run away screaming. Along that same vein I didn't know what was going on and was too scared to ask. But eventually I came to roughly understand.
    Then two years later, it happened. Like any geeks wet dream, I got to second base and duel booted my Toshiba laptop with debian. I found myself getting sucked in more and more, I didn't just want more I had to have it. Bit by bit, I stopped using windows for anything. Then after about a year after that I went all the way, when I purchased a low end machine for $100 and wiped windows and did an install of ubuntu (Warty). That eventually lead to admining and building my own machine.
    However now that I've graduated and working with OSX, I feel like I'm cheating on the old girl with the attractive secretary. What can you do? A man has his needs.
    Here is is hoping for another 5+ years of happiness even with the occasional exploration.

  90. slackware by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    ugh. i bought Slackware at a computer show for about $20 or so. installed it on a 486 with a Pentium Overdrive chip clocked at 83mhz. The first thing I did wass read howtos on how to use minicom to dialup to the internet, then use a ppp script to authenticate and negotiate. after getting the machine online, the first thing to do was to install IrcII heh. of course after an hour or so of compiling I was finally able to chat with my buddies. back then the kernel was 2.0.36 and my friends were able to teach me to use ipfwadm. at the same computer show I purchased Linux, I also purchased my first 10baseT networking hub, some network cards, and some cat5 cables. I was sharing my dialup connection with the other Windows computers in my house using Linux as the router. I remember hating XFree86 because I thought fvwm95 was my only choice. being introduced to wmaker made me very happy after that. essentially Linux was my guide to general networking and I'm very thankful for it. even though slackware sucks. that little bit of knowledge with networking helped me to get employed at a local ISP who ran Linux on some amazing Alpha 533's running 64bit Redhat.. I learned a lot about radius, authd, DNS, HTTPD, and much more.. I'd be pretty screwed today if it wasn't for slackware :-)

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  91. (Errata corrige) by badpazzword · · Score: 1

    Actually I think I first met GNOME first on a Debian live CD.

    --
    When ideas fail, words become very handy.
  92. first thing i did when i installed linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made it look like windows xp.

    1. Re:first thing i did when i installed linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first thing I did when I installed XP was make it look like 2000.

  93. Slackware 7 by Quantumstate · · Score: 1

    I bought an old PC for £30 from ebay, found the motherboard didn't work. The seller was decent so they sent me another PC which did work so I then got to put the extra ram and hard drive into the new PC making it a little nicer.

    I installed slackware on it just to see what it was like. It worked fairly nicely once I had found out that you need to run the startx to get away from the scary command prompt which filled the screen. I never really did much on it since I had no internet connection but I taught me a little.

    I then played around with various live CD's and installed a few distro's in Virtualbox on my main PC. Eventually in February this year I installed Ubuntu on my main machine dual booting with XP. I have booted into XP about 5 times since then and am now very happy with my system. And of course I had my first OS upgrade on Thursday.

  94. Whoah... by c · · Score: 1

    Let's see... either 1992 or 1993... it was one of the very first commercial Linux distros (Yggdrasil, IIRC). About 30 floppies in the stack, and it came with Motif so we could port our HP-UX applications (although it was mostly intended to be just another X head). I believe the system was a Dell 386DX with 8MB of RAM.

    For a while we also had Solaris x86 running on it. The system was eventually stolen from the office. I'd like to think it was one of the first computer thieves to encounter a Linux boot prompt.

    My next Linux install was in 1995, on an old Micro Channel 386SX. That was a classic install where you had to build a custom kernel, write your own network driver, etc. This led me to reboot the defunct MCA Linux project.

    c.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  95. Early 1995, I think ... by DrogMan · · Score: 1
    I was living/working in the US and one of our UK colleagues had brought a tape of Linux over - A Sun DC150 tape with SLS I think...

    So I bought a PC - a DX4/66 and an Ethernet card (ne2K) 280MB drive and I think 32MB of RAM. Loaded the tape onto one of the sun servers we had, NFS exported the partition, wrote a boot floppy and I think 5 more root floppys, booted the PC and did the install, initially off the floppys then via NFS.

    Half an hour later I had a PC running Linux, X and fvwm and it was more usable and faster than the X windows terminals I was using on the Suns we had.

    Back in the UK some months later and I switched to what was then an embryonic Debian and the rest is history...

    So the first thing I did with it was marvel at just how good it was! I had my own "unix" box. How cool was that?

  96. In retrospect, probbaly not the best approach by xoundmind · · Score: 1

    Installed Debian testing on an old Dell and only had dial up at the time. Of course the Winmodem didn't work, so that meant a custom compile and fighting with getting a driver installed from Linuxant. AA lot of struggle and learning involved, but how do I keep the damn thing updated without tying up my phone line every evening? Through the magic of cron, pon, poff, I automagically had the it updating itself at 3 AM every day.

    Wheeeh! The kids today have it easy.

  97. Provide X-term to users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I needed to provide X-term capability for a couple of users and didn't the money for X terminals (kernel 0.9 Slackware - lots of floppies). IIRC on the Windows side, it was 3.1 (not 3.11) and it required getting hold of Tatum's Trumpet Winsock to get TCP/IP working.

  98. Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by thaig · · Score: 3, Informative

    Couldn't be done on Windows at that time. Was blown away. Never looked back.

    --
    This is all just my personal opinion.
    1. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a similar story.

      The fact that the system came with a compiler was the reason I knew this os was for me. That and the fact that I squashed a really annoying bug in a program I was using. Took me 30 minutes to isolate it and fix it with one line (python), I was speechless. Mind you the bug wasn't fixed in the upstream atm.

      This opened my eyes to the power of oss.

    2. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by thaig · · Score: 1

      :-) cool.

      --
      This is all just my personal opinion.
    3. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      That happened to me a bit before going to linux, in fact, was in OS/2, around '95, doing a Pascal program, when i created a 10Mb array in a 16Mb ram pc. When a couple of years i landed into (slackware?) linux just took that for granted.

    4. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by thaig · · Score: 1

      I was a big OS/2 fan before Linux, especially when IBM started to fix all the mess that Microsoft left behind. Unfortunately I could only read about it, being in the third world and having no convertible currency.

      Linux was something that I eventually *could* have. I felt like someone getting a Challenger II tank with 40-volume manual after being used to driving a moped.

      --
      This is all just my personal opinion.
    5. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by tuxicle · · Score: 1

      For me, this was with DJGPP and CWSDPMI which gave me protected mode support under DOS. I wish I had switched over to Linux back then, it would have saved so much pointless junk like that...

    6. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by Jaime2 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmm. In mid 1993, Windows NT 3.1 could give any application 2GB of virtual memory regardless of the amount of installed RAM. As long as you have a 32-bit compiler, you can create a 4MB array no problem. With Win32s ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win32s ), you could even do it on Windows 3.11.

      There was a very narrow window of time where Linux existed and 32-bit Windows wasn't yet out. It would have to be a 0.x version of Linux.

    7. Re:Wrote a C Program that allocated a 4MB array by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, we did similar things with the Game of Life and other cellular automata. Massive grids we couldn't even approach in Windows.

      The best part about linux in '95 for me was I actually had my own UNIX. We had access to a multiuser HP at uni and played MUDs on that... suddenly we had pitched in and bought our own server setup and were going hell for leather making our own world...

      Now I have a cluster at home and still have the MUD. Games are bigger but the fun is still there.

  99. I used it to hide my porn collection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linux was really good for hiding porn from my religious parents. Even back in 1995 you could lock down your computer to keep prying eyes out. It took until Windows XP before the "home" version of windows offered file access controls or user logins of any kind. Even today, file ACLs are crippled unless you want to buy a more expensive version of windows.

    Since I moved out, I also realized that removing physical access is also a good part of computer security.

  100. my first time didn't hurt :D by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

    I remember the first time I installed Linux on my pc a 486 33mhz, 200 Mb HD. the first distribution i installed was Corel Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corel_Linux [wikipedia.org]
    it came whit a magazine I have bought, I used it to edit some pictures in corel picture.
    Actually I remember I was crying because I erased all my data on the HD.
    But I didn't started using Linux since... mmm oh yes, that was when ADSL got to my city. I remember it was dead hard to set up the friking Modem. That was the reason I didn't used Linux early.

    on the other side. come on slashdot developers, is it so damn hard to set up a easy way to imput the friking apostrophe â(TM) ,i mean, how hard can it be rigth?

  101. logged in by sanguisdex · · Score: 1

    and then I ran startx. And was never able to get my Dial up net working going, so I played civ- a call to power.

  102. slackware 3.4 1997? 3.3 1996? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    installed it from floppies on a 486, 800 meg hard drive.

    i re-call being thrilled when i was able to dial into my ISP via minicom.

    oh harsh lover slackware, it's been a long time for you and i. 12.2 currently runs on my home machine, though over the years i have flirted with debian and suse. (i install ubuntu occasionally to a laptop just so i am well informed for the mocking of fanboys. if it doesn't hurt, it isn't linux.)

    i even run slack on my eee pc.

    it hurts so good.

  103. My First LInux Date by squoozer · · Score: 1

    I first tried Linux back sometime in 98 and I installed RedHat. The install process went fairly well but I remember struggling for hours and hours to get X to start. I didn't do much with my Linux install for a year or so and then I discovered I could get a static IP address (very rare back then) and I started hosting my own webserver. I've been running at least one Linux box 24/7 since then. As a testament to how stable Linux can be in all that time my site hasn't been down due to a failure of part of the kernel or supporting software, I've managed to screw it up a few times though :). My longest uptime so far is about 14 months on a home server, it would have been longer but I had to move house!

    All in all I'm very happy with the progress Linux has made. I would like a little more focus on quality, there are a lot of really good ideas but they almost always have rough edges. And a little more consistency, some applications are fantastic (e.g. K3B which I've just used) and some, like Open Office, leave quite a lot to be desired. I feel bad for picking on Open Office but it looks and feels like it's stepped out of the nineties.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  104. My first usage by satsuke · · Score: 1

    Walked into my first real tech job in 1995 at a local ISP and discovered Linux (Slackware 3.0 and I think 2.2).

    We were using it to run CERN web servers on Pentium 75 desktop and 486/33 class machines on 8 megs of ram.

    I remember was being knee deep in swap all the time. That were were running a .99 kernel forever, and that in todays environment we'd have our lunch eaten because the boxes were running (and using) every usable service known to man at the same time (http / SMTP / DNS / nntp / pop3).

    We had to setup remote reboot capabilities because a local television station would flash their website on the screen during the nightly news and we'd get murdered when they posted an .au audio file of the evening news.

    On linux specific stuff, I just remember the lack of loadable modules, answering hundreds of yes/no questions to recompile the kernel, no SSH anywhere to be seen and it being a big deal when we installed stuff like top.

  105. Action Quake 2 by Karrde712 · · Score: 1

    My first experience with Linux was Red Hat 6.2. I installed it on some leftover hardware I had lying around after an upgrade and followed a HOWTO I found on the web to install an Action Quake 2 server. It ran for six months without a reboot until I had to take it home for the summer.

    --
    You may treat all information submitted above as wild speculation.
  106. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never though Linux would get boring.

    That's probably why I stick with Windows on all but one machine, which incidentally is a FreeBSD machine. Configuring Windows never gets boring. Even after that 23rd virus infection or when your friend goes to you and says "My computer is acting kinda funny".

  107. netscape by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    First thing I did was try to get x-windows to work. Once x-windows worked (with all the glory of twm) I got netscape to work. This despite the fact that the computer I was working on (386dx-20 old even then) didn't really have internet access (outside of a 1200 baud external modem -- I was cheap back then, and lynx was my friend for a very long time.) Don't ask me why but getting netscape to work seemed like a big deal to me back in 1995.

  108. First experience: gentoo, 'nough said by dudeeh · · Score: 1

    My first real experience was trying to install gentoo on my machine, I don't quite remember when that was, but I was new to the computer scene in general. After spending an entire weekend reading how-to's and what not, I was still unable to get my sound card working.

    I gave up on linux for a little while, but then I got back when ubuntu dapper came out. There was a small transition period, especially cause my laptop wouldn't quite work, but it's been a long time now since windows has "graced" any of my computers.

  109. MS-CHAP by jintxo · · Score: 1

    First thing I did was figure out how to recompile pppd to support ms-chap encryption. My uni had Windows servers for their dialup access, argh!

    It was a RH 5 CD that came with some book I bought. That was my standard way of getting linux cd's back then, because downloading CDs with a 9600 modem was painful). I remember downloading netscape taking almost a full weekend.

    Cedric

  110. gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first foray into linux was installing gentoo. It took a week of botched installs before I got anything running. But since then, my CFLAGS="-O4 -fomit-frame-pointer -omg_super_fast" has kept it running nicely.

  111. Knoppix to fix MBR by DeadPanDan · · Score: 1

    I first took a look at Linux with a Knoppix live CD back in 2001 or so, but didn't really do anything with it. I first used Linux several months later when I used Knoppix to fix my MBR. Linux became my new form of open-ended play, replacing Lego.

  112. Long time ago by cheebie · · Score: 1

    I tried to get X-windows running, failed miserably, and went back to Windows. This was 1998-ish, I think. It may have even been earlier. Back then, you had to have actual SysAdmin skills to use Linux successfully.

    I installed Ubuntu on my current machine after a hard drive crash. It works fine. There are a few web-games and videos I can't play/see because they are Windows-centric, but most everything else is good.

  113. I replaced SCO UNIX on my home machine by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

    It must have been one of the first Slackware releases. I had to jump through hoops to get it to install, but I've never looked back since. SCO was the best you could get at the time on Intel platforms, but it was way too expensive.

  114. no video drivers! by spcmky · · Score: 1

    I remember installing linux in '98 on my new computer which had 32MB ram and and overclocked MB with a 166mhz cpu! I was introduced to Unix in the CS lab at VT and wanted it on my computer. Found a linux distro, redhat linux colgate, Build date: Tue Oct 22 20:49:59 1996, and installed it. Didn't support my video card, had the matrox mystique with 6mb video ram. It did support the matrox millennium but I couldn't afford that. Switched back to win 95 and kept on playing Mechwarrior. good times. Came back to linux eventually but it was always hardware driver issues in the beginning.

  115. Installed On Atari Falcon030 To See If It Worked by Smackintosh · · Score: 1

    I think it must have been around 1994-1995. I never liked PCs and always used alternative computers...so at that time I had an Atari Falcon. I used an external SCSI enclosure for the drive to host the OS and had to buy the FPU for the '030 as Linux-m68k required it.

    Anyways, it was pretty 'hand-crafted' relative to even the manually installed x86 'distributions' at the time so it took some doing. But it worked like a champ. I can recall running the boot loader out of TOS, it loading the kernel, and then dumping to the console login getty for the first time. I was like, 'Wow, would you look at that.' I was stoked in the typically geeky kind of way only UNIX types can be.

  116. Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by dr_wheel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was probably around late '96/early '97. I had a friend online who I played Quake with who was constantly spouting off about linux. I've always been interested in computers, but had not really ventured outside of the realm of DOS and Windows save for some dabbling with OS/2 (which I thought was great, but lacked the needed support to be a really amazing end-user OS).

    After some nudging, he walked me through downloading and setting up RedHat (Colgate, I believe). I was enthralled by the seemingly endless customization and control over the operating system. Back then, I remember having a proud feeling just being able to get things like my sound card and nic working in this... foreign thing. I felt like I had actually accomplished something when I was able to get Quake running (w/ sound!) for the first time in a non-Windows environment.

    After getting used to RedHat, I moved onto Slackware. After all, RH was for n00bs! Heh. Anyone remember glibc vs. libc5? *grumble*

    Ironically enough, the same thing that got me into linux was the same thing that took me away from it: gaming. See also: the directx vs. opengl wars. OpenGL lost. As more and more developers started using directx, I ended up booting Windows to access many of the games I wanted to play.

    Desktop linux today? Many things have changed, yet so many remain the same. Most hardware is supported out of the box in distros like Ubuntu and Fedora. Gone are the days of having to edit a few lines of source to get your nic driver to work (mostly gone anyway). Everything 'just works', to steal some Apple thunder.

    However, gaming under linux is still a terrible prospect. Most games don't natively support it. The wine project, even at 1.x, is still in its' infancy. Even if a directx game does work under wine, it's usually buggy or performs poorly.

    Oh, I still boot to linux and regularly tinker. I also maintain an install via virtualbox. And there's nothing that I'd love more than to be running linux exclusively. But unless something miraculous is done, desktop linux will always play second fiddle on my home PC. Sad, but true.

    1. Re:Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      DirectX in VirtualBox is pretty good these days. And you can make a lot of apps that don't otherwise draw correctly do the right thing (tm) by using the Compiz window rules plugin to disable ARGB visuals, and force fullscreen where necessary.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by ZosX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Virtualbox still isn't low latency enough for sound apps to be truly useful. I'd love to see some sort of virtualbox flavor that we designed purely for running sound applications like live and reason. There's just way too much latency and I wouldn't mind even devoting a good chunk of CPU to having low latency ASIO outs in a virtual machine, but I think that the nature of the beast prohibits it. I mean, this is one of the bigger stumbling blocks to just virtualizing windows, at least for me. Also there are a whole bunch of games that don't run very well without excellent 3d acceleration. It has come a long way with the OpenGL-->Direct3d pipe, and wine still runs a bunch of stuff surprisingly well on the native side. Lately, I'm a lot more interested in running Linux in a virtual box on windows, but I don't think there is good 3d support for compiz and whatnot yet, whereas windows guests in linux get decent acceleration I think. The last time I devoted a significant chunk of time on it, I had linux as a guest on my windows box. Ubuntu 8.10 would run for a while and then corrupt on seamless mode. After a while it got to the point where simply booting into seamless would make the whole windows completely disappear. I posted a bug report to the virtual box team and never got a reply. Who knows. Maybe I'm just cursed. Ubuntu 9.04 won't boot on my machine either. :(

    3. Re:Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      My experience with running games in Wine couldn't be more different than yours. Every game I try in it works more or less flawlessly. A few might take a little tweaking, usually involving downloading a particular dll but otherwise, no problems. Off the top of my head, I play:

      Morrowind

      Farcry

      Half-Life 1 and 2 including both episodes

      Fallout 3

      Bioshock

      Quake 1, 2, 3

      Star Wars Jedi Academy

      Star Trek Voyager Elite Force

      I'm sure there are many more I am forgetting. My hardware isn't even all that. I'm running Arch on an AMD 3000+ with a Gig of RAM and a 6600GT graphics card. Framerates are quite good in everything except Fallout. But, it just completely overwhelms my hardware as it would were I running Windows on this and trying to play it.

      So, maybe give Wine another look.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    4. Re:Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by dr_wheel · · Score: 1

      Here is a list of games (and communication apps) that I tried to get working recently and the result:

      Cross Fire (www.crossfire-en.com)
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=9335
      -Complete failure via wine. Tried via virtualbox w/ wined3d, crashed X server.

      Team Fortress 2
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=9335
      -wine appdb reports TF2 as a "gold" game. Great, I thought. Installed fine, but the framerates were absolutely horrible! Severe stuttering and fps lag on a system that rarely drops below 100fps with all eyecandy enabled (c2d 3+ghz, 8800gtx). Under wine, I would drop to 5-10fps frequently whenever more than a few players are on screen. Unplayable.

      Ventrilo Client
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=2169
      -Yet another app that is reported as "gold". Client installs after significant tinkering. Unfortunately, push to talk does not work unless ventrilo is active window (effectively making it useless if you are in game and attempt to chat in real-time). There are several scripts that supposedly fix this PTT focus issue; none of them worked for me on Jaunty x64. So, the primary VOIP client that I use for gaming was useless to me.

      Xfire
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=2573
      -Another supposed silver/gold app. Xfire installs fine, but the text on the main window is garbled. It is also unstable. Workaround = installing the gfire plugin for pidgin to chat to friends on xfire. It has no in-game functionality, but it works.

      Quake Live
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=15796&iTestingId=37688
      -Yet another gold app that I could not get working properly.

      Left 4 Dead
      http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=14592
      -Gold app, even rated as Platinum by one submitter. Works, but performance is terrible compared to native under windows.

      Wine is a great tool, but it leaves much to be desired. Is this really a 1.x program? Probably not. Are some of these games really worthy of a Gold or Platinum rating? Definitely not. Admins should be reviewing these submissions.

      So I do appreciate the fact that you've had some success with wine. It appears, however, that we're just playing different games.

    5. Re:Oddly enough, gaming got me into linux... by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      I agree that games don't work well under Linux -- though ones that install natively, like Doom 3, work well. However, my conclusion was totally different from yours. I use Linux exclusively for doing anything, and my Windows machine has become relegated to little more than a game platform. :) I hardly ever touch it except for that.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  117. this pretty much summarizes it by hviniciusg · · Score: 1
  118. Slackware, summer '95 by tippe · · Score: 1

    I had the opportunity to use AIX or some other unix installation during my first work term in the spring of 95. I was blown away by how "awesome" the shell was (compared to DOS, the only other thing that I was used to) and how beautiful the screen savers were in X compared to windows (give me a break; I was 19 and new to the world of computers at the time). Then there were these things called "shell scripts", which really blew DOS batch scripts out of the water.

    Anyway, when I returned to school the next term, somebody in my dorm told me about some free version of "unix" that I could download and install in my computer, which was a raging fast 486-66 DX2. Apparently it even had X and all of the screensavers. It took 20+ diskettes and a long session using "gopher" at my university's computer lab before I was ready to install my first Linux distribution: Slackware. Installation was long, arduous, and confusing (what the hell were all of these packages?). Getting X to run took weeks to figure out, and in the end I think I had to re-install everything from scratch again. Ah, those were the days...

    Anyway, using and installing Linux has become a lot easier since then...

  119. Ubuntu, recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first try was with Ubuntu 8.04 I got it up and running, joined a domain, connected evolution to the exchange server, and tried to install a printer. Unfortunately there were no Ricoh linux drivers for my model. I tried using a few generics but none of them would print on this printer. I gave up and uninstalled it.

    Now I'm in a different company that uses Lexmark and Konica Minolta. I installed 9.04 yesterday and got it printing to the various lexmarks. I also downloaded WINE and am in the process of setting up teamviewer.

    Once I get a desktop system working the way I want, I'm going to try Ubuntu server with openLDAP and Samba. Currently we have 3 servers running CentOS doing DHCP, DNS, and Squid proxy but no centralized administration at all over 3 physical locations. Its a strange setup and I have no budget to fix it, but with linux I might be able to anyway.

  120. Building OpenLook Application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1995 I had to develop an OpenLook application and couldn't afford an Sparc/Solaris machine so I had to use the Linux way.

  121. Been a long time but... by jetole · · Score: 1

    Well I was 13 at the time, freshmen in high school but don't let that fool you since I was also taking my first programming classes. Anyways, I didn't like windows 95 and now windows 98 has just hit the market and it really didn't impress me. I knew I was a born to be a hard core computer geek and heard about how linux is used not just on the desktop but also on servers and it drew me to that whole wild new concept of "Unix" that no one I knew had ever heard of. So I bought linux for dummies simply because it had the coolest sounding distro in the back from my local borders. Installed Red Hat 5 which came with fvwm95, a pretty twisted window manager. I started using linux more and more and as hard as it seemed and keep in mind we are talking about linux 11 years ago, by the time I was 14 it was the only OS I wanted to use and by the time I was 15 or 16 I had gone through Linux From Scratch. Also at 17 I created an encrypted / partition before anyone had printed a how to for it.

  122. Counterstrike server by JShadow21 · · Score: 1

    This was when roadrunner was introduced to my area and they hadn't yet capped the upload down to nothing. I believe it was redhat 7. It was an old desktop we had laying around. It ran CS (beta 6 maybe?) with 24 people in it great.

  123. first time was bad by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    I installed linux from a pile of floppies a foot high.

    Then I got lex and yacc up and running, and started doing compilers howework.

    Then I accidentally rm -rf'd the root dir. Turns out that the distro I was using had 'su' aliased to 'su -' or something similar and I was in slash instead of a subdir because roots homedir was /. I realized all this about 2 minutes in, wondering why the hell the harddrive was slashing eraseing a few kb of crap.

    So I picked up the phone, called the department and dropped compilers.

    (I took it again the next year, with a much better prof, so it worked out!)

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  124. Curses! by batdog · · Score: 1

    1996: I was an contract programmer. As a favor to a friend and fellow contractor, I agreed to update some ancient POS (point of sale, piece of s...) software for one of his clients. The program ran on SCO Unix. Interface was curses. I had never used any flavor of Unix before, and I wasn't about to buy a license for SCO. So, 12 hours after meeting with the client for the first time, I had installed a dual boot RedHat system and got the code to compile under ncurses, which required a few dozen changes to the least-common-API. I was using vi to edit the code, which was also brand new to me then. About a week later, the improvements completed and running under Linux, I took the modified code back to the customer on a floppy, to deliver the finished product. To my astounded delight, it compiled and worked under SCO!

    The ease with which I, as a developer, was able to adapt to this alien platform, forever linked me to it. Having RedHat installed on my development machine (a beefy Pentium 166 as I recall), I kept it there and started using it more and more.

  125. MC by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

    I played with it a bit but didn't really know if I could do anything with it. The first thing I really did was find "mc". I typed it in and looked at the screen. It looked like X-Tree. A little tear formed in my eye. All the sudden I knew that everything was going to be OK. From here I could do anything I needed. I grew out of it in about a week but it that flash back to something known was all I needed to take command.

  126. My first time with linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ShowEQ

  127. 1998 to try GIMP by ghostis · · Score: 1

    I have two firsts. My first load of Linux was in late 1998 with the help of WLUG (wlug.org). I wanted to try coloring my mecha sketches on this new beta software that people were talking about called 'The GIMP'. It was some version of RedHat. The second first was the first time I did a non-trivial install myself. I cobbled together an AXPCI Alpha PC and spent some long nights getting milo to boot without using a floppy and building the latest kernel.

    --


    Computer Science is all about trying to find the right wrench to bang in the right screw. -T.Cumbo?
  128. Slackware, 1996 by Archeopteryx · · Score: 1

    What we really WANTED was a high-end Unix machine, but Zenith couldn't afford it, so we got a couple of 166 MHz (zoom!) Gateways and installed Slackware on them.

    We (we being cable systems architecture and advance development group) used them for cross-development, as servers, and workstations. I installed netatalk on one and used it to translate between our Network Appliances RAID box and the Macs we used for day-to-day work. I recall having to change some of the disk size calculations to bigints as the size of the RAID was much larger than netatalk could deal with.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  129. aw man, where's my C drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I installed some version of RedHat. Good thing it had a wizard and everything was nice and automatic. What did I know about partitions...
    Some friends told me it would even dualboot, nothing to worry about.
    I remember feeling increasingly panicky when I couldn't find my C drive or even sane directory trees and normal dos commands. Sure linux would have these, right?
    Apparently, my very enthusiastic friends failed to mention that there was a lot more to linux than just a free alternative for my recurring blue screen experience.
    Ever since that first anxiety wore off though, I've been hooked. I learned that I should RTFM and that diving head first into vast new territory was not such a brilliant idea. But hey, that's always been my way. (learning how to ride a bicycle as a kid should have warned me though :)

  130. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by Bert64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't use Ubuntu if you want to configure things yourself... Try LFS (Linux From Scratch)... Even Gentoo is fairly automated these days.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  131. UPS Package Tracking by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    My first Linux app was a UPS package tracker. It dialed up to UPS and tracked it over their direct modem line. I had to reverse-engineer their checksum algorithm. I wrote it as a finger server. My co-worker Don wrote a CGI interface to it. I think it was 1993 or 1994.

    Boy it blew away the big shots at UPS when we demoed it to them. They went and wrote their own.

  132. Your first kernel compile/install? by Hangeron · · Score: 1

    I've been around since Linux 2.0.32.

  133. My first experiences by webheaded · · Score: 1

    I first used Linux when an uncle gave me a copy of Mandrake Linux. I also tried Redhat around the same time. I have to say...I did not like them. Installing software from source was a REAL bitch. I never had any idea what I was doing. I didn't have internet in my room at home (keep in mind this was when I was about maybe 14 or 15. There was no particularly obvious way of doing anything. Nothing made sense to me...even with a book about USING Linux...I could never find out where the hell things installed and they never appeared on the menus afterwards.

    You know what really drove me nuts, though? RPMHell. REAL fun to deal with that crap when you have no internet...let me tell you. Trying to track down all the damn dependencies was frustrating as hell. RPMs are what kept me from using Linux much for probably another 5 years after that. Nothing was easy on Linux, nothing made sense, and EVERYTHING was a pain in the ass. Nowadays things can STILL be a pain in the ass, but having internet makes things a little easier to figure out. I will say the Ubuntu would have been damned nice to have back then as a starting point...maybe I wouldn't have ended up being so pissed off trying to play with things even if I DIDN'T have the interwebs.

    After a few dual boot installs of Linux, I pretty much reserved to install it inside of a VM from then on and pretty much only played around with it just for kicks. I always loved the whole concept of Open Source. I wrote my senior paper on it (GNU, Linux, etc. etc.) even if I didn't use it as my primary OS. It's nice to see things have shaped up since then...its at the point where I actually consider it nearly on par with Windows from the nerd perspective of "I can use it and do the shit I want without much hassle." The only real issues are when I want to upgrade something...that can turn into a real witch hunt, but you know...I can deal with that now and again. Beyond a few pretty gaping holes in software such as web development tools like Dreamweaver (before you call me a noob, I use them primarily for tables and quite frankly doing things I don't really WANT to code by hand and don't need to, though I've found Kompozer recently), REAL video encoding tools (most around now can't even hold a candle to tools I use on Windows as the ones in Linux are a pain in the ass and I would like something easy that doesn't need 8 billion things set up from a command line first, though I've found avidemux2), and the random oddball thing, I can pretty much accomplish anything in Linux that I need to now...except transfer to my Zune. Have to run Virtualbox for that or just boot into Windows that I still have installed so I can play games.

    Now I've got Gentoo up and I've even gotten to the point where I can help OTHER people fix shit. Of course, most of that has to do with the fact that no one can use a search engine for shit anymore. Seriously, how is it that I can find things for people when I don't even know what they are and yet...they come up with nothing?

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
    1. Re:My first experiences by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how is it that I can find things for people when I don't even know what they are and yet...they come up with nothing?

      Let me introduce you to a friend of mine:

      http://www.lmgtfy.com/

      It's a great way to give people answers while simultaneously informing them how to use the internet and fulfilling your evil needs.

  134. Slackware by b0ttle · · Score: 1

    Back in 1996 I downloaded the slackware packages from sunsite.unc.edu ftp, which took forever with my dial-up connection. Then tried to configure and compile the kernel for at least 3 times, before actually succeeding. It was a pain in the ass to configure my sound card.

  135. I broked it. by memphis.barbecue · · Score: 1

    I broke it trying to upgrade.

    I was in a Christian college back in '06, and heard about Ubuntu in a computer science class. After purchasing a new hard drive (being paranoid about losing my Windows data), I installed Ubuntu 6.06.

    When 6.10 came out, I decided to upgrade, and I did it over the school network. Problem was, the linux upgrade had a package called libsexy2 in it which was promptly caught by the internet filter, so the upgrade crashed. Being the paranoid person that I was, I uninstalled the libsexy2 package from my Ubuntu installation.

    Without noticing the list of other packages that would be uninstalled, I uninstalled libsexy2, and with it the rest of Gnome. Eventually, I had to re-image my drive because I couldn't apt-get anything (the school network required a login through a web browser).
    Since 6.06, I've been running Ubuntu as my main OS, though, and it treats me well.

  136. NAT ( IP Forwarding) by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

    I already had a few different machines in my house in 92-93. One was my first PC which ran windows 95 (and later NT4 when MS was giving it away with Visual Studio Tools). One was the PC I had just built. I was also in line to get hooked up to the new high-speed internet service called "Wave" (served over the CATV system). I had already seen hardware internet sharing devices for dial-up but they were very expensive. Some of my peers said that you could do the same thing with Linux.

    So I bought a copy from FutureShop (Slackware 4.0) and started installing. I've been running a Linux box ever since.

    1. Re:NAT ( IP Forwarding) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simlar story here, but in a corporate setting. Had to figure out how to get multiple computers to work through 1 network connection (dial-up).

  137. Bad news :( by u38cg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
    (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

    H:\>ping 138.253.85.33

    Pinging 138.253.85.33 with 32 bytes of data:

    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.
    Request timed out.

    Ping statistics for 138.253.85.33:
            Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

    H:\>

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  138. slackware on 100 floppy disks by lkcl · · Score: 1

    my first linux install was slackware 3.1 in about 1995, as i needed linux in order to make the improvements to samba that i could see it so desperately needed. at the time, there was no integration with the network neighbourhood, so that's what i started on - nmbd.

    i walked in to the computer room at cambridge university. various students kindly held the door open for me so that i could get in. i sat down at one of the machines, pressed alt-f1 (as advised) and was able to use the command-prompt to do a wget and then a "dd" copy of the floppy disk images.

    ironically, the cambridge university connection was 350k/sec (in 1995!!!) and was far faster than the speed of copying to floppy disk.

    i got the first twelve or so "basic" disks, and soon discovered that i needed x-windows, the gcc compiler, and much more.

    i accidentally missed out one of the x-windows disks, but it seemed not to matter.

    by the time i was done i had bought or recycled 75 floppies, and had had to return five or six times to the lab, each time some kind student held the door open and let me in.

    there was no way i could have installed that lot over the internet - even the local cybercafe only had a 26kbaud modem.

    in the end i got what i needed - the gcc compiler, x-windows and enough to get samba compiled so that i could start tinkering with it.

    slackware seemed like a good idea at the time, as i simply didn't know any better. it was only later, when internet connections became much better, that i got - and have stuck with - debian.

  139. I screamed and cursed at it! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Yup...

  140. Atari... by oh2 · · Score: 1

    I had an Atari ST when I started University in -91. I did some experimentation with MiNT, a variety of MINIX, on it for a while. Then a year later I got an old Ericsson 286 and loaded that up with MINIX. In 95 I built a new PC from discarded, begged and bargain basement pieces and loaded it up with RedHat, hated it and then found Slackware, which I liked a lot :) Ever since then Ive been running mixed environments, macs, PC running windows and linux. Suits me fine, I like change.

    --

    Now the world has gone to bed, Darkness won't engulf my head, I can see by infra-red, How I hate the night.

  141. Slackware by Virak · · Score: 1

    Version 9 or 10 or so. I don't remember exactly why I thought, as someone new to Linux, that going with Slackware instead of something else would be a good idea, but the first thing I did was try to get it set up. And the second, and the third, and so on. Eventually I managed to get a nice little GNOME desktop running, and learned a fair bit along the way. Including that managing software under Linux without a proper package management system can be kind of annoying, and having up-to-date software is nice on a desktop, so I went on to other distros for various periods of time, including Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, Debian again, and even a brief stint with FreeBSD somewhere along the way. Currently using Arch, and have been for the past couple of years.

  142. Learn Solaris 3.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I kid you not but when I was sent out on a Solaris course for my work (around 1990 or something) I was quite anxious to learn this powerful beast, and would also really like to do something at home. Naturally it wasn't an option back then to run Solaris at home (the x86 version was either non existent or way too expensive) and so I resorted to Linux. Grabbed a RedHat 3 ("Picasso" iirc) installation, installed it without a problem and then I could start digging into all those Unix commands (naturally keeping in mind that there were differences, but still; back then all basics were pretty much alike).

  143. Remember like it was Yesterday by backdoc · · Score: 1

    I was practicing Chiropractic at the time. I was in my office looking through a Popular Mechanics April 1999. I saw an article about Linux with two screenshots, one of KDE and one of GNOME. I couldn't believe my eyes. I said to myself, "I have to have that."

    A few days later, I was walking through the parking lot of a shopping center. I noticed a sign in the window of a computer store that said, "Have you checked your LUGOJ?", with a large picture of a fat penguin. I knew what I was looking at. I knew this was about Linux. So, I subscribed to the mailing list at lugoj.com. I actually already knew a guy in the group who was willing to come over to my house and help me get Slackware and Red Hat installed on an old 486.

    It was awesome! It changed my life.

    I sold my chiropractic practice and went back to school. I finished my prerequisites locally. Then, I drove 1.5 hours one way for 2 years to complete my Computer Science degree.

    1. Re:Remember like it was Yesterday by backdoc · · Score: 1

      Oops. That's lugoj.org, not .com

  144. First I was just poking it by theillien · · Score: 1

    Then I figured out how to set up a router using an old Gateway PC so I could share my DSL connection back when the ISPs thought they could force us to pay for more than one single DSL connection to a single house.

  145. xgas by Tony · · Score: 1

    I first used SLS 1.02, in late July of 1993. I downloaded a slew of floppies and booted up on a generic 386 with 8M of RAM and a 30M hard drive. The install took a couple of hours, doin' the floppy shuffle.

    After getting on-line and checking out several gopher sites, I finally found all the info I needed to configure the Cyrus video card (which had 256K video RAM). When I got X up and running, I ran xgas. And then, the coolest thing: I ran xgas again. And again. Until I had the screen filled with xgas windows.

    It was the coolest thing, seeing all of those xgas programs doing their thing at once. This was true multitasking, and I finally understood what the term meant. I realized this OS was so

    Then I learned all about virtual desktops with olvwm. I eventually moved over to FVWM, which is still around. Man, was FVWM cool when they included the ability to use .bmp textures in window decorations.

    I wrote up how to install SLS 1.03 in this article. I know I'm geeky, but it was a lot of fun to go back to see the early days again.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  146. Same sh*t another decade by Delifisek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In year of 1996 and it was slack 3.x.

    Takes 8 hours to proper setup from floppies to a 486 dx 33 with 32 mb ram and a S3 Trio card And I can't configure my graphics card.

    Today I update my kubuntu 8.04 to 9.04

    And guess what...

    I can't configure my x to work with ATI...

    I'm too sick to fix again...

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
  147. Slackware was first by Unxmaal · · Score: 1

    In 1995, my pal Robert (or was it Jeff?) downloaded a Slackware distro -- via slow modem, onto floppies. It took about a week.

    We all passed the floppy set around, installing Linux onto our computers. By February of 1996, id had released the Quake demo. I had Win95 on my old craptastic Packard Bell, but it simply wouldn't run Quake. I spent hours trying to get the SVGALib Quake to run. I distinctly recall nuking my system in an effort to get X running, and somehow typing (as root) "rm -rf / usr/local/lib". See that extra space? Yeah, that was fun.

    I got a new computer, but couldn't get Win95 to run, so I switched to OS2/Warp. It wouldn't boot at all. Linux would run, but would crash a lot. I finally discovered that the scumbags who sold me the computer had swapped the new 486 Intel chip for a much older and slower Cyrix chip, and overclocked the hell out of it so that it'd show the appropriate Mhz at boot.

    I finally switched that POS out for a new computer, and ran dual-boot Linux and Win95 for several more years. Today I use Macs, but they're mainly pretty window dressing for terminal sessions on Linux machines.

    --
    http://unxmaal.com
  148. My First Install by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The year was 1996. I was young, dumb, and full of ... self-confidence.

    I had been posting little Perl includes to a Slackware server at my ISP for a couple months. I was a pure hacker - everything I knew was from trying it. I was still getting emails from their admin saying things like, "Could you stop putting 'end(0);' at the end of your scripts - it's supposed to be 'exit(0);.' You're filling up our error logs."

    I made a ten page static website for a little Mom & Pop computer company (Micro Trends). The owner of the company put the URL in an ad in Computer Shopper magazine and his phone and fax caught on fire. The ISP said we were generating too much traffic, and they'd have to start charging him for bandwidth.

    So he decides to expand, pull in a T-1, split off... four channels IIRC for data and use the rest for voice. Meanwhile, he talks to me about working for him full time on the website. We reach an agreement and I show up. He hands me a Cisco router, a computer, and a CD with RedHat Rembrandt on it, then points me at a closet where the T-1 lands. "It should be easy," he says, "my cousin set up his own."

    So I dive in. I sat in that closet (a coat closet, not a euphemism for a small server room) for the next week, my head spinning with thoughts like, "What does 'kernel panic' mean? It sounds bad." To that I added a few dozen phone calls to Cisco support, the ISP, and everyone I knew who had ever used the word 'Linux' in a sentence (all two of them -- Thanks, JY and Neil).

    It is truly amazing what you can achieve when you are not aware of your limitations. I posted a test page early in the second week, and migrated traffic to the new server the week after that.

    Then I started on the dynamic site. Filled with things like a a custom shopping basked that carried the order -- including the prices we would charge -- in a cookie. The customer's credit card was transmitted in the clear over HTTP, of course. But that is a story for another article.

    It was a helluva lot of fun. I've never looked back, and have not regretted a day of it.

    1. Re:My First Install by tubeguy · · Score: 1

      Is that micro-trends.com?

    2. Re:My First Install by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

      Is that micro-trends.com?

      It's been so long I don't remember if we had the '-' in the middle or not -- I think so. Definitely not the current incarnation, though. I left Micro Trends for a job in NYC in 1998, and the owner cashed out shortly thereafter to open a night club.

  149. Gentoo Linux by mcnazar · · Score: 1

    Had aborted attempts in 2001/2 with Corel Linux but wasn't that impressed.

    Got hooked by Gentoo, however,around 2003/4 when I read through their stage 1 installation process. Learned more in those three days than I did in 10 years in IT about the constituents of an operating system and how it all interacts.

    Was hooked even further when installed Gentoo on a chipped XBox, which then ran as my home DNS/File/OpenVPN/SVN server.

    Never looked back since!!

  150. just this one-liner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # sudo rm -rf / && sudo apt-get install windows

  151. Yggdrasil Plug and Play Linux1994 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    installed it and used it for quite some time, then went to RedHat, Suse and now Kubuntu.. All my systems at home run Linux, most of the machines at the store I work do too. Never looked back, never regretted it.

  152. A kid and games by dwhitaker · · Score: 1

    I think my first experience with Linux was when I was around age 12. I remember installing Corel Linux on and old, unused box my family had in a closet. I didn't know what to expect at first, but once I realized it installed X-Galaga (Galaga being one of my all time favorite games) I figured it was good enough to learn more about.

    I probably played X-Galaga for four hours straight at first.

  153. Red Hat 5.2 by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I remember eagerly awaiting my CheapBytes disk of Red Hat 5.2 around 1998 and then spending a week or so getting everything installed and working on a way underpowered "server" that had a bunch of SCSI drives and very little RAM and it became a LAMP server and ran PostNuke to run a fairly successful Playstation 2 game review website all hosted from my home and with dyndns since we had no real static IP.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  154. Konqueror by Jonwww · · Score: 1

    Fired it up to see if Pron looked any different on Linux

  155. started with Linux due to using Solaris/AIX at uni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the topics says: When I was at uni studying computer science, we all had accounts on an AIX cluster and on some Solaris machines.
    Installing Linux as 2nd OS at home was the next logical step. Later the uni was also using Linux for some labs.

    Next serious use I had for Linux was installing a PC router/firewall with ipchains/iptables etc. for our living community that did packet filtering and traffic shaping to allow online gaming, surfing, ftp, peer to peer stuff in parallel without one user using up all the upstream bandwith and driving the ping up for low latency networking apps like games that others used.
    Took some time to get it right and some kernel patching etc. in the beginning, but worked amazingly well. At that time probably the best alternative to some really expensive professional solutions.

  156. The first thing I did with Linux was... by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I wiped my partition table.

    Ooops.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  157. Probably slackware by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

    A friend in high school introduced me to linux back before internet access was common (BBS FTW!)

    I'm pretty sure it was Slackware. For several years after that I'd switch back and forth between linux and windows. As I started to accumulate computers I would keep just one Windows for games and the rest linux. I remember using Redhat, Mandrake and probably a few others.

    Then I discovered the Linux from Scratch project. After I got tired of maintaining my own bash scripts to recompile everything I looked into some project called Gentoo.

    I expect that I'll be using Gentoo for a while.

  158. Memories by wampus · · Score: 1

    I installed RedHat 4.2 on my Compaq 486DX2. The BIOS wasn't compatible with LILO, resulting in a screen that was all LI 02 02 02 02 02 etc. I posted for help from the library and some smug cocksucker pasted the manual for me.

    So nothing has really changed.

  159. Setting up a firewall router for a secondary schoo by tuxisthefuture · · Score: 1

    I had just taken on the role of Systems Manager (which turned out to be more like the role of a fire fighter trying to keep the RM M$ network under control). On my rounds I soon discovered that the main firewall/router was a bit dodgy in that it kept falling over every now and then. Attempting to locate the issue I soon discovered the distinct lack of a license to run the software. Pricing up a legit copy turned out to be in the region of £1500 so I thought "Hmm, my mate knows about that free Linux thing". Soon called him up to roll in and spent a week setting up my first Linux box with his assistance. Since then it is my OS of choice. Unfortunately the school did not take kindly to our use of Open Source software, "Open, indicates that is is easy to break into" - was the reply from the head teacher. I have since thankfully moved on from their.

  160. 1997, Slackware by kil3r · · Score: 1

    In the late 1996 my friend talled me that there is a nice "Unix" for PC? I thought it might be interesting experience since I was administering some Solaris and Irix at that moment. It was Slackware (dont't remember the version but I'm pretty sure the kernel was pre 1.0) installed from a broken CD, which resulted in many packages not installed or installed not properly. It kept dumping core every couple of commands and overall experience was not very pleasant. However a couple of weeks later I gave it a second try. Downloaded most recent version of Slackware from sunsite (it took me more than one night over a modem ;) and installed. Now it was kinda working. The ethernet card was not detected (it took me couple more days to solve it) yet I liked it so much that after so many years I'm stick to Slackware... :)

  161. Edited keyboard layout. And couldn't edit it back! by dallaylaen · · Score: 1

    That was in 2000. A friend of mine brought me a Slackware clone (I didn't even know what Slackware meant at the time) on four floppies. After some effort we managed to install it.

    I noticed that the keyboard layout didn't exactly match my keyboard. "No problem", he said, "just edit that text file and tell the system to use it". I did it, and it got a bit better. Then I tried once again, and again, and finally could not save the file any more.

    I had to reinstall from scratch.

    It took me several years to switch completely, but Linux had won my heart already.

    --
    WYSIWIG, but what you see might not be what you need
  162. Slackware in the early 90s by abarrow · · Score: 1

    I was experimenting with amateur packet radio in the early 90s. Used a TCP stack called "NOS" for a while. It had to fit in 640K, so every time you compiled it you had to compromise on features to make the final executable fit. Heard about Linux and ended up compiling version 1.2. Never looked back.

    Ever since then there has been a computer somewhere near me running a variant of Linux, even though I have since given up on packet radio.

  163. Slackware 3.6 had a bootable CD...... by JoshDmetro · · Score: 0

    I used it because Partition Magic was a awful awful program, yay fdisk. And also I could use it to backup and fix certain problems with badly broken windows computers.

  164. Late 1997/1998 by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 1

    We messed around a bit with it in 1996/1997, but a little after that we were trying to use Red Hat 5 to provide some web services, on server-class hardware. That was . . . interesting. Compaq Smart Array support? After a lot of work. Getting a tape drive working correctly and reliably? Far harder than on commercial Unix, OpenVMS or even Netware releases available at the time. There were just a lot of bugs, and almost no documentation (as opposed to the shelves of carefully written and edited docs available for Solaris, Tru64 Unix, HP-UX, AIX, OpenVMS, etc). At one point, I remember stomping out of the system room snarling about "tinkertoy operating systems". I remember seeing newsgroup and mailing list posts at the time along the lines of "we want to support X hardware, can someone send us one so we can test it". Cool, but it didn't give you a great feeling about putting the software in production.

    There are still things that it's only just catching up on. Commercial Unix releases (for the most part) solved the device persistence / assignment issue years ago. Sure, it was easier with SCSI, but they came up with ways of handling it in a consistent fashion with other types of devices as well. For the most part, it just worked. With Linux, that's only gotten better somewhat recently. If you were trying to use fibre channel storage arrays, USB backup tape devices, and other hardware that gets enumerated at boot time but isn't always available in the same order on each boot, you could have a problem.

    Dealing with storage has been something of a weak spot with Linux over the years. It's a lot better now, but dealing with fibre channel on linux up until a couple of years ago was a huge pain in the ass compared to other operating systems.

  165. Slackware circa 1994-1995 by Saint · · Score: 1

    60+ floppy disks and a lot of time...worked beautifully on an IBM 386. Used a modem for a ppp connection to the internet and spent way too much time reading l0pht posts.

  166. Should have stayed on Linux by Ilgaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if you managed to mount floppy, you would notice the strange silence and figure the sad fact when you first run xmms. Yes, no sound.

    Fix was easy (I bet it is unneeded now)

    chmod 666 /dev/dsp along with the soundblaster config at /etc

    While it was total torture after Windows (and coming from Amiga to that land), I am thankful to Patrick Volkerding and Slackware. How? Well, I learned how the unix logic works (even the 666) and compiling things from source. I still use that bits of knowledge today on OS X.

    What made me nuts after a year (no dual boot!) is the need of recompiling kernel for a freaking USB mouse. It is not Patrick's fault, I hated one thing. Kernel developers (of that time) was ignoring the PURPOSE of USB. The USB is here not because it is state of art tech, because it is massively dynamic.

    1. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You did it wrong. You were supposed to put yourself into the group that owned /dev/dsp, and chown it 660. Whoops! Back then Linux wasn't meant for everyone, it was meant for those who could read and follow directions. Today we have more user-friendly options. I would argue that no operating system without a LiveCD or system restore CD should ever be installed by any end-user. (The exception being Macs, which don't need any additional drivers unless they're significantly modified. But then I'm talking about MacOS.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by 7213 · · Score: 1

      I feel yer pain pal,

      I started with Red Hat 5.0 in '98 on a, wait for it, Packard Bell. Nonstandard Hardware FTL!. That chmod 666? I wish it where that easy to get my soundcard/modem combo card working under Linux back in the day. On the plus side, this is how I learned about the basics of the linux kernel, module management & recompiling. And BOY did it take a while to recompile the kernel on a pentium 133, but all that scrolling text was mesmerizing.

      Once I got everything working, I didn't have a whole lot to DO in the OS until around 2000/2001, but it sure was fun to get working...Finally made the full switch in 2002...(personal year of the Linux desktop).

      Sick man that I am, I found this level of frustration fascinating & I was in love w/Linux ever since. (k)Ubuntu is almost boring now (thank god for KDE4 to keep me angry :-) ).

    3. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Red Hat 7.3 on a Packard Bell pizza tower. I becamed amazed at how weird the hardware was. My favorite thing was USB: I had a USB Ethernet adapter (no free PCI slots) that used the pegasus module, and a simple modprobe pegasus just worked. I had never had anything like that happen in Windows. Oh, and when my soundcard would be unusable, I would just tell XMMS to use my USB speakers directly. My Digital Sound System 80 is my favorite Microsoft product.

      The pegasus module is still present in my stock 64-bit Fedora 10 install, BTW.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    4. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

      Oooooh snap. I remember that one, although I think the safer solution is to make yourself part of the sound group and chmod it 660. Of course, my solution AT THE TIME (this was lateish 90s) was to chown the entire dev directory to my user account.

      Le sigh. The stupid of past me.

    5. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I knew the chmod 666 is extremely dangerous but I thought "So what? They will hack into my system and make it sound?" :)

      Well of course, these were the times everyone had kickbanned because they joined a IRC chatroom as root.

      I am saying I am very glad that it was real pain in the ass since it thought me how to USE linux very effectively. Next week, I was compiling ALSA by hand. If I had x86, it would be still Slackware or Debian for me.

      You actually learn how to edit files safely in /etc on Terminal, how the init scheme works, why it is important and why you should never, ever run as root on a Unix system.

    6. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't beat my rm *.* in /dev back when /dev was a real directory, moving to Windows and doing the exact same thing (del *.* forgetting I am in \WINDOWS\INF) and watch Windows ask me for keyboard driver diskette.

      Even more funny, I commented on "norton undelete" as "What kind of moron would need it?" just days ago before the incident. Had to ask inf.zip from very same IRC chatroom I was in.

    7. Re:Should have stayed on Linux by jasonwea · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: Up until a couple of months ago I was still using the pegasus module on my MythTV box because I ran out of PCI slots.

  167. sls softlanding systems omg by phil42 · · Score: 0

    it took forever to get it running. and then the mouse was unhappy. i don't know whether i want to remember or forget.

  168. Slackware, 80 floppies by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    Nuff said.

    I think I actually spent less time on that project than I did trying to get Windows NT installed from a couple dozen floppies at the time.

  169. Um . . . Geeked out? by ensiferius · · Score: 0

    I Installed Red Hat 5.1 with "Red Neck" as the installation language, on my Pentium 33 MHz and connected to my ISP with my 28.8 modem from the command line. I learned about IRQ's and monitor refresh rates. No plug and pray at that time. Ah the good old days. Of course I was still using emacs, but you have to start somewhere. :)

    --
    "Oh drat, these computers, they're so naughty and so complex." Marvin the Martian
  170. Tried in vain to access the floppy drive by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Didn't give up like the poster below and reinstall Windows.

    My method of coping was to not turn the machine back on for two months.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  171. This is going to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first experience with Linux was in 1994. It looked a lot like DOS to me, but without anything useful to do. I went back to Windows 3.11.

  172. Debian 2.1 -- broke it and reinstalled by Nimey · · Score: 1

    March 1999, on an old Packard Bell with Pentium-83 Overdrive and 12MB of FPM DRAM. Installing it was an adventure, because the CD drive was on my Sound Blaster and boot-floppies didn't have /dev entries for (IIRC) /dev/hdf at that time.

    Debian was the first OS I had that not only had a command-line MP3 player (FreeAmp) but it would run on such a slow machine without stuttering, which Winamp on Windows 95 couldn't do.

    I promptly broke it by screwing around with chmod or something and reinstalled. Then I did something else and had to reinstall. By this point I was making dead-tree notes like a fiend and learned rapidly.

    However, I had an earlier experience with Linux of sorts -- someone made a ZIP file containing "Speaker Doom", which had a minimal Linux distro, the Linux version of Doom + shareware wad, and a Linux driver for the old PC Speaker -- it was able to do a very low-fi version of the SoundBlaster sound effects, but out of the cheesy speaker, instead of speaker-pessimized effects like DOS Doom had. The whole thing was bootable from inside MS-DOS via loadlin.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  173. Got slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew there was something to this Linux thing when my OS/2 software site got slashdotted in 1998, thanks to the briefest of mentions.

  174. Lemme see.... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    Somewhere around 1993-1994, a 486DX2-66, Slackware with a 1.13 kernel, a 56k leased line, and our company's new website hosted on that machine with the original httpd... Boy this takes me back....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  175. He? Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article's author is Kristin Shoemaker, a "she" not a "he" or a "guy".

    1. Re:He? Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days you can never be sure...

  176. Slackware by Flammon · · Score: 1

    It was 1995, Windows 95 kept crashing and I wanted something more powerful than DOS/Windows 3.1. I tried OS/2 but I really wanted to learn Unix. One my friends who was more advanced than I tech wise and who had introduced me to the modem and the AT command set, had a cousin who was nice enough to mail me 12 floppies and a huge dot matrix printed manual of the Slackware distribution. I spent days learning and installing Slackware on my 120MB Quantum. Then came the big hook, switching VT. After that, I knew that I was never going back and that my destiny was on the path of Linux.

  177. the first thing i tried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i tried to set the resolution to the native resolution of my monitor and couldn't get it to work. i went over tutorials, i talked to all the gurus i could find. my final answer from the mighty community support? we don't know what's wrong. it sounds like you fucked something up.

  178. The filename is spkdoom.zip by Nimey · · Score: 1

    If someone wants to try out Speaker Doom, search for spkdoom.zip.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  179. I don't remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I don't remember anymore. Was something before Redhat Linux 6. Now I'm 23. So when did I start using Linux?
    Anyways, playing with it led to knowing all Grub error codes and commands and I'm a confident Gentoo user now. Never liked Debian-based systems.
    Redhat Linux still looks the same way it did back then. Although it had a more evil touch, now it is all candy ;-)

  180. rfc1149 anyone? by rbrausse · · Score: 1

    no one here with a really special and specific task that needed linux?

    at least _my_ reason to install a linux on my pc was http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ - I was really curious and used this later for an university project (unfortunately we had no access to carrier pigeons but everything else worked).

    I used some Suse distribution and to be honest: I only stayed after that with linux as I wasn't willing to see the (at this time) inferiority of linux compared to win2k :)

    1. Re:rfc1149 anyone? by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 1

      Well I think in 1997, I made the equivalent of a linksys router for my brother's shop. That was an ipchains PAT server to give all the computers connected to the COAXial network access to the internet.

  181. Before you learned to speak by scanrate · · Score: 1

    Slackware v0.0something around 1994. Stored on and ran off a 5.25" floppy on a 386-25 with 256K of RAM and a 40Mb disk. Or 192K/20Mb. It was 20 computers ago and hundreds of OSs ago. I ran it long enough to say "this sucks" and went back to my brand-X SVR4 install which was installed off of about 50 3.5" floppies.

    I just upgraded my quad-core box with 4G RAM/500G Rust from Hardy to Jaunty yesterday from an ISO I downloaded.

    Time warp...

  182. The year was 1995... by Masa · · Score: 1
    ... and I had just installed Slackware for the first time. The very first thing, I tried to do, was installing X11. If I remember correctly, I had to make several tries and it took almost a week (every evening after work) to me to get the XFree86 configuration working with my monitor and my Cirrus graphics card. It was very educational start for me. I had to reinstall the Slackware several times during that week and I learned a lot about my computer hardware and also learned to configure both Linux and X11. Eventually I got everything working, even the slirp connection, so I was able to get to the Internet.

    So, before even starting to use Linux for anything useful, I spent my time fiddling around and learning stuff.

    I still have a special place in my heart for Slackware.

  183. Old school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed it on my shiny new 386-25 with cyrix co processor, ran a null modem cable over to my house mate's IBM-XT and installed prolog. He did his CS homework this way.

  184. first experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Downoading a TON of floppy disks to run Slackware... don't remember the version. Remember having SLURP because I could get a shell account for cheaper than a PPP account, and with SLURP I could run several emulated serial sessions across that one dial-up connection.

    I also remember when X sucked so badly under Linux (without any real applications) that you didn't bother to install it... and if you did, it was SO slow, it still wasn't worth running.

    This was also when WINE couldn't even run Solitaire.

    Oh, and then there was the joy of downloading the latest Kernel every few days and re-compiling it because it hadn't hit the mystical v 1.0 kernel yet.

    Had a 56K frame line at our little college at that point.

    Linux as a whole has come a long way since then.

  185. SLS was the first Linux distribution by yelvington · · Score: 1

    Soft Landing Systems created the first Linux distribution.

    I downloaded it through Gopher onto well over a dozen 3.5-inch floppies using a PC at the library at work -- and a 2400bps dialup connection. There were no ISPs back then. I connected to Gopher through a University of Minnesota library dialup number. If you knew how, you could jump out of Gopher and into FTP to MIT.edu.

    I took the boot disk to a junk computer dealer across the street from the Minnesota Supercomputer Center. "Make me something that will boot this, and I'll buy it," I told him. I left with an 80386.

    Like you, I had been running a UUCP system -- on an Atari ST. Some of us had set up a UUCP-to-Citadel network gateway. I wrote an rnews clone.

    Once I got Linux connecting through SLIP dialup, I thought I was in heaven. Started patching the kernel with daily alpha updates FTP'd from Finland.

  186. First time : slackware 3.1, end 1996 by wazoox · · Score: 1

    I first tried to install on my Pentium 133 PC, however I never managed to make room for Linux without breaking the existing windows 95 installation, then I had trouble getting the CD drive and hard drive working...

    I forgot Linux for some time, because I didn't feel the need; in 1996 I had a nice SGI Indy, in 1997 I had a beefy Octane on my desktop and in 1998 I had an Octane, then an O2. However I finally installed successfully that good ol' slackware on a spare 486 machine (DX2 66Mhz 64MB RAM) I had lying around and it worked fantastically, so I set it as a small test server.

    Shortly after that I finally managed to install RedHat 5 Linux alongside windows on my main PC. I kept using RedHat until RH 9, then switched to Slackware (for my personal desktop) and Debian (for server use).

  187. My Initial Linux Experiance? by Akir · · Score: 1

    Finding a distrobution that didn't crash. Linux wasn't always as easy to install as it is today (Have you tried to build your own Linux system? It's surprisingly easy to get a basic system going today.) Nearly every distrobution I found crashed as it booted from the CD. Eventually I discovered Ark linux, which worked beautifully. Then, for whatever reason (Ark crapped out), I installed collegelinux, which, unfortunately, wasn't as good a distro as Ark was.

    I installed Mandrake Linux as soon as it was gifted to me. It was and still is the only decent linux system in a box. And the CDs! There were so many discs! Unfortunately, the distro was outdated before I even got it, so I eventually dropped it and went back to the dark side of computing. That is, Windows.

    Note that this was all because of the frustration I had with Windows ME. ME wasn't really as bad an operating system as people said it was, but after about a year or two, it would crash every time you'd start it, with some undocumented problem you couldn't fix even if you knew the OS at a source code level.

    So which linux distro am I using today? None; I'm running Windows XP, with all my unix-required needs and OS development tools in hardware-accelerated VMs (Has anyone ever told you how much better VirtualBox is than VMware?). SiS chips and a lack of expansion slots prevent me from running it. And I could never get NVidia's stupid driver to work, so I never even got a chance to play around with KDE4's special effects. Seriously, I've begun to think that people who say that their computers run with hardware graphics acceleration are lying - neither NVidia's nor ATI's drivers have ever worked for me.

  188. what worries me... by hitmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that this is yet another "i spent hours fixing" kind of article.

    most people these days do not want, or have time, to fix their computer, they just want it to show their videos, image, play music, browse the web and read email, and type up the odd text file or spreadsheet. oh and, games. lots of games.

    basically they want something that works, and if it stops working, somewhere to drop it of so that it can be quickly fixed. apple makes it clever there, with their "genius bar". even if said "genius" just follows a step by step guide for swapping out some components to see if that fixes the problem, or basically format and reinstall the os, it gives the non-geeks the impression that someone listens to them and cares about their problems.

    sadly, its the same thing that fuels the tech support horror stories, where someone comes in with a explanation like "i tried to insert the thing, and something showed up on that screen followed by it going black and not reacting to the dohickys. i want it fixed, now!".

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  189. Uninstalled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uninstalled it and went back to Windows ME.

    1. Re:Uninstalled by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Uninstalled it and went back to Windows ME.

      You sir, are a masochist!

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  190. You had me at "passionately load kernel modules" by monoqlith · · Score: 1

    How strong would you say your relationship with your husband is? Would he be offended if he knew we were dining together?

    My Gmail is makebinutils@gmail.com

  191. Back in College - GC/UI Courses by tmontes · · Score: 1

    My short (happy) start,

    Back in 1993 or thereabouts I had one computer graphics course where we had to do a 3D project in PHIGS / SPHIGS (remember that?). The lab had about 20 NEC colour X Terminals - beautiful beasts, by the time - which, of course, were shared by many students; in short, the lab was always packed with people and it was not the most confortable environment to give the first steps in UNIX graphics programming - noisy and very often with no available seats.

    A friend got hold of Linux in what were maybe 15-20 3.5" floppies -- that would be slackware, IIRC -- which we managed to install on a non-branded PC. I recall having trouble in getting X to work and fiddling with the modelines to acheive something like 800x600 with probably 8 bits per pixel! :)

    In the end it was a great learning experience. We did most of the work at home and, from time to time, tested it at the lab.

    Later (or maybe that was the initial trigger?) we had a different course where we had to program directly on top of the X API and also on top of Motif - we also used our home PCs (now that I mention it, I'm not really sure if we had Motif on Linux by then).

    Well, there you go: that's my "how I started".

    Since then it has been a very rich experience both using Linux and commercial UNIX solutions at a professional and personal level. The distance between what Linux was by then and what it is today is huge in every aspect, but it was already very useful and valuable by then.

    Let's see what the future holds for it. :-)

  192. Formatted the machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See linux, format the machine! Install Windows! :)

  193. 32bit to 32bit by melancolico · · Score: 1

    When Windows 95 came out I was using OS/2 Warp. A friend of mine was operating a BBS and suggested I try this operating system called Linux. Going to bookstores I found some books that included some distribution or another, I tried Slackware 3.0. The only challenge I faced at first was configuring X11 to work on my S3 Virge, once that was done and I could use more than the text console the flood gates were open and dove completely into this free 32-bit alternative. It's been a very long painful road to take, but the joys of never getting a computer virus, or having a coherent system with files dating back to early 1990's far outweigh the pains of setting it all up. I use BSD for server duties, but I still use Linux to fix Windows machines and as a primary desktop. Compared to 10 years ago, Linux is dream to install, configure and use pretty much any distro.

  194. Wrote Code by Peredur · · Score: 1

    Wrote a screensaver for xlockmore, which was then picked up and continues to this day in XScreensaver. Main reason for trying linux (was 1994ish) was to learn programming. Took me almost 2 years to port my screensaver from Applesoft BASIC to C after reading all the X windows programming books I could find and learning C.

  195. Many interesting tales by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I find many first experience stories saying the same things: "I couldn't do this so I went back to Windows." And the reality was at the times they majority are stating, these things were all quite doable if only they did a bit of searching and reading.

    I am not faulting all these people for "giving up too soon" or simply lacking ability to work problems through, but I am indicating that even these "techno-elite" people have serious issues with change and things that are difficult or otherwise not obvious to resolve. This experience should be multiplied by the masses of non-technical people and that should offer a strong indication of what Linux needs to become before it can become any potential replacement for Windows.

    1. Re:Many interesting tales by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

      "Replacement for Windows"?

      I think you will find that quite a few people were already on the "cutting edge". Using OS/2 and such. Windows wasn't even an "also-ran", it was, at that time, a complete non-starter (1991-1996).

      Linux is not the next thing after Windows -- by any measure it is a contemporary. The question that many have is "why doesn't Microsoft make Windows more compatible"?

      It helps to revise history (from the winners perspective), of course. But, back in the early '90s, Linux wasn't in competition with Windows (Windows 3.1, WfW? Give me a break). It was in competition with SCO (and, to a lesser extent, BSD).

      Windows was NOT even remotely the target -- it had already been surpassed (technology-wise). You could build a (reasonably reliable) server based on Linux 0.99. Try that with Windows 3.1 or Mac OS of the day!

      Linux allowed easier experimentation with OSs than Minix, and BSD was caught up in some disputes. SCO was too expensive.

      --
      Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  196. Not a great experience by Dr+Egg · · Score: 1

    First time I used Linux 6 months ago at Uni. The PC's were running Kubuntu and it made me want to kill myself using it. Generally doing anything on it was a complete hassle and not worth the effort put in to it. Alot of the other people in my class felt the same (BSc Computer Science) and we've now only ever used that Linux lab once :V

  197. doom shareware by JBv · · Score: 1

    I think it was about 95/96 I was an undergraduate student.

    A friend of mine in the lab installed Slackware from floppies, complete with doom, on a pentium 120MHz. It was the only lab computer with a serious game. Linux seemed both alien and magical to a DOS/windows 3.1 user.

    At the end of the year I was running c++ code on a Alpha station with RedHat 64bit installed, it was buggy (no X, console garbage) but faster and more useful than NT.

    To think that it took me almost 10 years to come back to 64bit Linux on my workstation :)

    1. Re:doom shareware by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I have a similar tale. Starting with barely working slackware on 486 machines and a pile of floppies. I still smile every time I drive by walnut creek, CA. Those CDs saved so much hassle downloading on a modem.

      I also had a 64bit alpha machines. (DecPC 150, multia) It took a long time to get the majority of software developers to stop doing 32-bit only hacks in their code.

  198. Desperately tried to install Enlightenment DR0.13 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very first time I saw Linux, it was about 1997-ish and I encountered Enlightenment DR-0.13 (the one with the ray traced window decorations and the little TV screen virtual desktop managers) running on a monstrous 21" CRT. At a time when Windows 95 was still widely considered a huge improvement in UI design, seeing this "lye-nucks" thing utterly blew me away with possibilities. It was beautiful, it was pure evil... I had to have it.

    I spent months in what I would eventually find out is called "RPM Hell" trying to get that evil desktop on my own machine... all in vain. The closest I ever got were some cheap DR-0.13 knock-off themes for various, less fiendish window managers.

    To this day, there is a small, ray traced hole in my soul that may never be filled.

  199. Near riot on the airplane by michael_cain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Early 1992, Manchester Computer Center (MCC) distribution on a half-dozen floppies, on a laptop with a 20 MHz 386 with external floating point unit, 4M of RAM, 40M hard disk, 640x480 monochrome display. Added a port of (then) Bellcore's MGR light-weight windowing system.

    On an evening flight from New Jersey to Denver, I had the machine out with an analog clock in one window, was compiling something in another, and editing a document in a third. A guy headed back to his seat from the restroom stopped and yelled up the length of the plane, "Hey! This guy's got UNIX on a laptop!" Next thing I knew there were half-a-dozen people hanging over me, elbowing each other and some of the other passengers, all trying to see and asking questions at the same time. The flight attendants were NOT happy.

    IIRC, recompiling the kernel on that machine took about 45 minutes.

    1. Re:Near riot on the airplane by ciderVisor · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Hey! This guy's got UNIX on a laptop!"

      Did a 12yo girl come up and say "It's a UNIX system! I know this!" ?

      --
      Squirrel!
  200. Redhat 5.2 by sakari · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, I remember when I picked up my ordered box back in 1998 from the mail office, looked at the odd interface pictures from behind the cardboard box and fiddled with the cool manual and stickers that came with it.

    The first steps were very odd, installing with the boot disk and several CD-ROMS. I remember being very excited about this totally new system. Beforehand I had only experience from the usual MS-DOS and Windows. The road to 100% Linux use was long and hard. So much new commands, new way of thinking about things and these strange source code packages you could download.

    Lots of compiling the kernel trying to get my SB32 and ISDN cards working .. the ISDN setting up was a lot of manual work back then, I even wrote a document on how to get it done in Finnish as nobody else had done before.

    Playing quakeworld, ircing and listening to mp3s at the same time, nice :) Also the quality of the developer tools and environment really surprised me, compared to the MS-DOS counterparts I was used to, like 64-kbit segments of memory. After that I guess I tried every possible distro available. Slackware was my pick of choice after moving away from Redhat, and after that Gentoo, then Debian and now Ubuntu if I have to use Linux. Mac Os X is so much nicer on the desktop.

    I remember all the years that were supposed to be the 'year of Linux on the desktop' .. I guess their approaching that now :)

  201. killall esd by rumli · · Score: 1

    My first Linux installation was Ubuntu Breezy Badger, and I looked up the Ubuntu forums to get sound working. Finding a solution (namely, killall esd) so quickly gave me the encouragement I needed to find fixes for the other issues I encountered (screen resolution, DVD playback, CD eject, etc.).

  202. Got on usenet by tubeguy · · Score: 1

    I wanted to show off my fancy new linux headers.

  203. I never installed X by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    But the first thing I typed into the shell was:

    man woman

    Then I giggled.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:I never installed X by julesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But the first thing I typed into the shell was:

      man woman

      Then I giggled.

      My first *nix shell experience wasn't with Linux at all, but SunOS. First day at university, and I had received no instruction on how to use Unix at all, had read no books on it, had never even heard anyone _talking_ about it. All I had was a sign on the wall telling me how to sign up for a new account and log in.

      So, I finally get to a shell prompt. And the only relevant experience I have is from using either CP/M and/or DOS. So there I am:

      $ help
      help: command not found
      $ commands
      commands: command not found
      $ what the fuck?
      what: command not found

      So I start peering around the room. Guy behind me is also doing this. Sneaky look... hmmm... "ls" seems to do things. Try it. It works. So there I am. Only damned command I know is "ls". I know from somewhere that this system uses forward slashes to separate directories, so "ls /". "ls /bin". Start trying random programs in there. So I find 'man' by experimentation. Things start to get easier.

      This rather peculiar way of learning Unix shell probably had the bizarrest of influences on my habits. For example, for e-mail I used 'elm', despite 'pine' being way more popular at the time. Why? It was earlier in the alphabet, so I tried it first. I used 'rn' for months before I found 'trn'.

    2. Re:I never installed X by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      This rather peculiar way of learning Unix shell probably had the bizarrest of influences on my habits. For example, for e-mail I used 'elm', despite 'pine' being way more popular at the time. Why? It was earlier in the alphabet, so I tried it first. I used 'rn' for months before I found 'trn'.

      I deduce that SunOS had no apropos command...

    3. Re:I never installed X by vgaphil · · Score: 1

      You were using the wrong command, it's wtf not "what the fuck" =]

      http://linux.die.net/man/6/wtf

      --
      A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it. -- Einstein
  204. my first linux by ccollins00 · · Score: 1

    my first linux experience was in 95, we got e-mail at the school i was attending and i learned how to use pine and lynx and talk, after school i left for quite a while until i installed mandrake 9 on my only pc and wiped out windows, my wife didnt like that, so mandrake was abandoned and windows prevailed... i used knoppix and backtrack until i got my laptop and installed ubuntu

  205. ahh those were the days by cmdr_tofu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was no issue of "switching back to Windows" because the only other OS on my 486/33 was DOS! In DOS, I used Turbo Pascal, Turbo C and Turbo C++, telemate, GLITE(a word processor), a really cool TSR French Translator and a few games.
    So what did I first do with Linux? I ran gcc, vi, started learning Perl, used minicom, spent many pleasant hours in /usr/doc/HOWTO, wasted ridiculous amounts of time playing nethack, and occasionally ran dosemu. I remember I installed Slackware (which I liked), and Redhat which put this weird grapical thing in between me and the terminal, and Debian. I eventually stuck with Debian and now on to ubuntu. Compiling the kernel to support a new network card took a full working day (and we liked it!).
    Eventually in my pursuit of a CSE degree, I had to install Windows 95 in a dual-boot configuration to run LogicWorks. But I did put VNC on the lab computers and just VNC'ed into the lab after they were closed from my SLIRP'ed dialup at home. And whenever I had to work from the Lab computers, I was VNC'ed into a terminal on my home machine. (This was before the ubiquitous putty)
    We thought 1 GB HD was big back then and we liked it, now get off my lawn you whippersnappers!

  206. Congratulations! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is the worst possible explanation I've ever seen on this site for the failure of Linux to Just Work. Somehow, through all the crap, it is OK, because you learned to waste your time configuring something that should have been done for you.

    But, hey, you got it for free, you can't complain, right?

  207. Slackware 1997 by IceDiver · · Score: 1

    I used it to set up a demand dialler and firewall on my old 486.

    It was interesting because there was an error in the diald package. The distro included a newer version that used different file locations, but the install script still used the old file locations. I learned a lot figuring that one out!

  208. First Linux Experience by rholtzjr · · Score: 1

    Set up a console only DNS and Mail server on Slackware Kernel version 1.2.13 for a company to prove that Linux can handle the job.
    Had to combat several Sun and Windows developers who where trying to sabotage by exploiting early vulnerabilities. All in all, it was an experience that I would repeat again.

  209. Replaced DOS by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1

    It was 1999, and I was still using DOS with Win3.x, having refused to jump to a Windows-based OS. I had been eyeing linux for a while, but there was one Win3 killer app that I didn't want to abandon - Visual Batch Script, a scripting language for connecting and automating GUI applications. With VBS, you could get info on all the open windows, scrape their text areas for content, and feed them mouse clicks and keystrokes, which meant that you could automate just about anything. My Linux-guru buddy insisted that scripting was linux's greatest strength and that I could do similar things with tcl-tk. So I bought a new computer, installed Mandrake, and starting migrating everything over.

    Of course as I discovered, linux had nothing even close to VBS, and ten years later it still doesn't. But I learned to embrace what linux could do, and left VBS and Windows behind. I now use KDE's DCOP for GUI automation, which is horrifyingly limiting and frustrating, but then life is full of compromises.

  210. over the rainbow by cwes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Installed Debian in 1998 trying to get IP masquerading to work so we could play Rainbow Six in my dorm room - over dialup... It was funnier in '98

  211. Frank admission there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or in the words of Krusty the Clown: : "I'm a freaking moron!!"

  212. Monitor set-up and fvwm by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    I remember being freaked out during the install because I had to know the Horizontal and Vertical refresh rates of my monitor and the warning said if I didn't enter them right my monitor may be damaged.

      The other was the desktop, if you moved your mouse to the right it would scroll over, a virtual desktop I guess it was called, it was fvwm.

      I think it was Redhat v1.0, I had Redhat a Cheapbytes CD but I'm not sure if that was my first distribution, it was hard to download any big files because of dial-up a smokin' 3 Kbps on a good day.

  213. Just install it, then record video by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    I started out with Red Hat pre-installed on a computer from Penguin Computing, but none of it made any sense to me. Reading the manuals, I found that nothing was where I expected it to be, so I gave up on that.

    I installed Slackware instead--found that things were where the manpages and web pages said they were, and liked it.

    After a few installs, and a lot of help from the community, I was able to record video to CD-ROM using an iomega video capture card (zoran chip) I got from ebay for $25.00 There were no windows drivers, but it worked fine in linux.

    At the time, though, there just weren't enough CPU cycles to process video in a timely manner--so after making 2 or 3 videos, I gave up and just used the box as a general purpose computer.
    Word processing, web browsing, etc.

    Linux was fun and I learned a lot when I had time to screw with it.

    Now, I mostly use windows XP because it's easiest and I've got better ways to spend my time (wife, job, house, dogs, cats...).

    I still have puppy on a microSD card, though, because there are some things that are easier (or even possible) in linux that aren't in XP.

    Right tool for the right job.

    Ideologically, I prefer G/L/X, but rigid adherence to ideology is expensive in many ways.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  214. NAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to provide NAT to a dial-up network of 5 computers. Yea, I shared a dial-up connection with 5 other computers back in 1996.

  215. Slackware, 1994 or so. by Albert+Schueller · · Score: 1

    To install it I used something like 60-80 1.44" floppy disks on a Packard-Bell which I created using the network connection and computers at school. I successfully installed it, but I never got the video past 800x600 (though I played with modelines til my eyes crossed). My only network connection was a modem. I can't remember if I had ppp at that point, but something makes me think I did because I was so excited to have multiple shells connected to the school machines.

    The whole reason for even trying was to get a unix environment at home to run LaTeX. I was in graduate school in the math dept at the University of Kentucky. I've been running some flavor of linux at home ever since (slackware, redhat, debian, centos, ubuntu).

  216. My first real Linux usage... by MisterCaptainFunKill · · Score: 1

    I had been using Windows forever but I had thrown up ProFTPd a few times on a Mandrake machine to serve up music on the local dorm network...

    I knew the reputation Windows had and it was frustrating to use sometimes even when I used it primarily. One of the really irritating parts was having to reboot at the drop of a hat. By early 2005 I'd been using that FTP service for a year or so and I hadn't really gotten together the initiative to make the jump to Linux full time. Then I was reading one day and I found out about Windows Palladium and NGSCB and TPM enforced DRM and all the bullshit that was supposed to be possible with Trusted (Treacherous?) Computing. That was the straw that broke the camel's back. I went to the book store around that time and found a Fedora Core 4 book. It looked nice and I got it. The summer of 2005 is when I went cold turkey to Linux and I have never looked back.

    The first thing I remember doing after really moving to Linux was setting up a network between my laptop in the living room and my desktop in my bedroom. I played music on my desktop loudly enough that I could hear it in the living room and I telnetted [sorry SSH :(] into my desktop and killed the process that was playing the music and it stopped! Man, that was so exciting.

    Since then, I've gotten more into it. I've set up software RAID and LVM volumes and compiled custom kernels and all that stuff. I've been using Slackware the last two years or so and I really feel comfortable. I have all the tools I need in terms of programming C/C++/Python (those are just the ones I use), serving FTP/HTTP/SSH/etc. , the RAID stuff I was talking about earlier (mdadm is a godsend)... I can even play a lot of the games I like under WINE (because the games I like are Starcraft and Diablo 2) (my gaming 'career' became stunted when I moved to Linux but my programming skills and knowledge of my hardware shot through the roof!).

    I know this wasn't supposed to be some evangelical Linux thing... but I really enjoy and appreciate Linux. If I want to make backups of my hard disks, I don't go buy some expensive Windows software. I use dd or add the drive to my active soft RAID volumes long enough for it to sync and then remove it... If I want to modify or transcode audio or video, I don't go buy some expensive software, I use MEncoder. I don't go buy compilers, I use gcc and g++. I didn't have to beg the writers of kasteroids to make bullets last forever and fire more frequently, I downloaded the source and made them do that myself!!

    Linux just allows you to control your machine on a level that's just not possible in Windows and I hate hearing about how Linux users "just don't like to pay for things." I can't afford to pay $30-$80 for some crap utility to convert gifs to jpegs. Why not just use GIMP? I'm not going to pay $80-$100+ for some utility to sync my drives when I could use a one line command to do the same thing (dd,rsync). It's like a bad joke.

    I'm finished with my rant. Sorry for letting my "first linux experience" turn into "linux fanboy hour".

    1. Re:My first real Linux usage... by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      You do realise that "Linux" != "Open Source" ? The GIMP and OO.o are available for Windows, too. Just sayin' like...

      --
      Squirrel!
  217. TOP was my first love.. by janeeja · · Score: 1

    I first installed Debian somewhere before the potato era. On a 386 I had to put the hdd on the same cable as the cdrom otherwise it wouldnt boot.

    I installed it and accidently got in to `top` which was the most unbelievable KEWLLLLLst thing I ever saw !!!!

    In that time people still took the time to properly write a manualpage grmbl..

  218. I pretty much... by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

    Exploded with joy when I finally got my modem to work in Mandrake 3.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  219. linux "experience"? A little different comment by smchris · · Score: 1

    My first "experience" with linux was when it killed the Mark Williams Coherent unix clone I had been playing with for about four years. It seemed like they were on a roll. Graphical user interface was in play and they had deals with Lotus and WordPerfect -- _the_ spreadsheet and word processor at the time.

    And then they folded around the end of '95. How do you compete with free? Coherent should be recognized as the first OS that linux destroyed in the marketplace.

    I went full-immersion at home in '01. Red Hat and then Debian. The Coherent experience certainly helped even if dial-up UUCP was a thing of the past.

  220. a.out to ELF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After getting used to RedHat, I moved onto Slackware. After all, RH was for n00bs! Heh. Anyone remember glibc vs. libc5? *grumble*

    I upgraded from an a.out system to an ELF system by hand. I didn't want to blow away the system (and had no place to copy my /home to), and so had to do a delicate balance of upgrading the toolchain, system compiler, and then libc. Then all the other installed components of the OS.

    A little later I had saved enough money to buy a second drive, and so I copied my homedirs to it, and then did a clean install of a new OS on the first.

  221. To start a mud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first experience with Linux was back in 94/95 in the attempt to start a MUD. I did get one going, but it was all the playing with linux that got me going. I started out learning about SLIP, some networking stuff, compiling software, minicom, and the shell. Ah the days past. Now I'm the Sr. Systems Engineer with an online media company, and we are entirely Linux based for the site. Of course between point A and point B were Linux, Solaris, AIX, True64, SCO (ick!), and HP-UX...

  222. I spent about a day trying to get it to work by hairykrishna · · Score: 1

    1998, spent an age trying to get some random distro (old Red Hat?) to play nice with my graphics card. Never did succeed. I'm glad that such fruitless struggles are (mostly!) a thing of the past...

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  223. REMOVE! by acer8930 · · Score: 1

    The first thing I ever did with Linux was remove it. It had no appeal to me. Lack of driver support and just boring compared what I can usually do with Windows. It wasn't anything special or unique. It was just blah.

  224. compile the password program by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    The first thing I did was find the source for and compile the "passwd" program. The SLS distro on several floppy disks didn't include one.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  225. My First Time by MikeUW · · Score: 1

    Was around 2003 - and that was just monkeying around with Fedora Core 1. I didn't have a clue what I was doing and quickly gave up - went back to whatever version Windows I was using. I later tried and gave up again (after a bit more time) with Fedora Core 3 (2004).

    First time I did anything actually useful, was around Fedora Core 4 (2005) - but it wasn't actually Fedora that I did it with. I wanted to backup/resize my Windows NTFS partition, and make new partitions, and I wanted to do it without using proprietary software (I had no money, and don't agree with using pirated/cracked software). Through clueless fumbling and googling, I came across Recovery Is Possible (RIP) Linux and Knoppix, with ntfsclone and QtParted. That was pretty much it...I've had dual boot systems ever since, though I only really keep Windows only for games (which I never have time for anymore). For the times I really need MS Office, I have one legal copy that I bought and installed in a WinXP vm I run in VirtualBox. Unfortunately...I think because of MS Office, I'll never be able to quit windows for good.

  226. Caldera by hitest · · Score: 1

    I started with Linux in 2002, my first distro was Caldera Openlinux 2.3, the company that later morphed into SCO:) I then moved to a variety of distros: RH 9--->Debian--->Slackware/FreeBSD. I'm very happy with Slackware; it meets my needs.

  227. Mandrake and 9 partitions by whatever3003 · · Score: 1

    My first Linux distro was Mandrake after reading an interview in PC Authority (1997?) with RMS and another article about Linus and Linux. The auto-partioner set up roughly 8 or 9 partitions for me (one for /, /etc/ /boot/ /home/ ...). I was thrilled when it finally installed and I was playing Frozen Bubble and had a stack other free software immediately, but I soon nuked it in favour of Gentoo - then SuSE and then Gentoo again.

    I'm on Ubuntu now running ion3

    --
    "Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing." -- Salvador Dali
  228. Tried RedHat back in 1995 by jsimon12 · · Score: 1

    I have always been a big Solaris user but back in 1995 I heard of this new x86 "Unix" so a buddy gave me a copy on floppies I tried it thought it was "neat" but then just switched back to Solaris running on my Sparc LX (hey it had built in ISDN). Would be another few years (~1998-1999) till I switched to Linux for my desktop (first RedHat then Debian).

    Still miss my Sparc LX though :)

  229. 93 or 94: Slackware 1 on early Toshiba laptop by dickens · · Score: 1

    It was late 93 or early 94.. I was at DEC and there was this Toshiba laptop kicking around that nobody else was using. I installed Slackware 1.0 on it from floppies, and if memory serves I could either install X or gcc, but not both. It had 4MB of memory, a 40MB hard drive and a grayscale LCD. It was probably a circa 1990 laptop.. very early

    Never actually used it for work.. and never had a working Ethernet adapter. I think I had SLIP working.

  230. Slackware by TheDarkSavant · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the exact year. Mid 90's. I installed Slackware from floppies on a Xerox laptop with 10 MB HD and 4 MB RAM. I used it to write and compile c code for school.

    I still have that laptop, but nowadays not even DSL will run on it :(

  231. Dial on Demand Firewall by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    My first linux machine was a 486. I used it to handle my internet connection. Whenever I tried to do something online, it would autodial my ISP. When I was done, I'd run the script to shut it down.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  232. Two chicks at once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really enjoyed that. Been a Linux user ever since. Until then, I had no idea that chicks dug guys who ran Linux so much. Why didn't anybody tell me?

  233. slackware linux 2.1 1995 by Da_Slayer · · Score: 1

    I did the install and the first few things I remember doing were configuring a script to use my modem. Dialing my friend up and using ytalk to chat while rebuilding the kernel to get my video driver and sound card working so I could use X and Netscape.

    Now days the installer does everything for you except wireless well. I still have some problems with soundcards and video cards in this modern era but it is mostly due to closed source drivers and not having configured the kernel wrong.

    --
    Push harder towards Open Media/Content
  234. Slack 7.1 on a 400MHz Celeron by nacho_dh · · Score: 1

    400MHZ Celeron
    32 MB Ram
    4 or 6 GB Hard Disk

    It was a Slackware 7.1 I got from a local magazine I used to read. I was around 12 years old back then, so time to work on my projects wasn't really a problem. It took me 2 days (at that age that's like 16 hours of uninterrupted work) to make the X server work. I also remember making work the SpeedTouch 330 USB ADSL modem was a nightmare, and took me at least 2 weeks; but I really can't recall if it was with Slackware or Debian.

    3 days ago I installed Ubuntu on my new laptop, it took around a minute for the live CD to automatically detect every single device on the computer. We're definetly not that far from Skynet.

    --
    The world is a tragedy to those who feel, but a comedy to those who think.
    1. Re:Slack 7.1 on a 400MHz Celeron by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      333MHz Celeron
      32 MB RAm (later 96)
      30GB Hard Drive

      Also Slackware from a magazine, can't remember the version, probably 5. I managed to install it easily, having installed Windows a lot of times in the past and being very patient reading every option. Got it installed and finished at a command prompt. Called a friend who knew linux and asked: now what? He told me about "man" and startx.

      After a few hours I knew how to set modelines in xfree and got a server started. Got a hold of the mplayer source code and compiled it. It was 0.1.7 alpha, IIRC. Worked the first time!

      That was the main reason I installed linux in the first place: my computer couldn't play avi files with 5.1 sound in Windows 98, because the processor was too slow, and in linux it could. I still think the mplayer guys are dicks but also some of the very few who earned the right to be dicks, as they are just as good as they say.

      Also I have to confess that getting sound to work in console mode was mindblowing (mpg123 is great), also getting mplayer in console. The only time I was as happy to get something to work was when I compiled KDE 2.0 (I think)from source in Redhat, since I couldn't wait the for the official packages because KDE had just got antialiased fonts.

  235. Red Hat Web Server by Stunning+Tard · · Score: 1

    Seconding Web Server.
    It wasn't until I was finished with PC gaming that I tried Ubuntu as a desktop. Before that it was just easier to pirate windows.

  236. Owwwww... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Must have been around 1993 or so. I downloaded Slackware on a 2400 baud modem. It took every evening of a week before I could have something big enough to be usable.

    Then I had to make room on my computer, which had something like a 120 meg ESDI drive. I removed some junk, shrunk the partition, made a new compressed partition, shuffled some stuff there, shrunk again the partition, compressed it, etc... until I had something like 5 DOS partition and enough room (something like 30 megs) to put Linux.

    Now, bear in mind that my first ever home machine was a homemade 6809 box running Uniflex, so Unix wasn't exactly new to me. In fact, I spent the previous few years swearing at how DOS was stupidly useless compared to Unix, and I just could not afford to pay $1000 or so to get Xenix or SCO. So I endured.

    Anyways, I finally installed Linux, and wow! wow! wow! I finally had a Unix machine to work seriously on. I eventually got myself a 320 megs ESDI drive and so I was able to have a cleaner system with more space, and I started to try X-windows (but on a 386-16 with 3 megs of RAM, it wasn't exactly a success).

    Eventually, I was able to have a second (then a third) machine, since then, and I always have had at least one machine running Linux.

  237. Puppy Eyes by pixelot · · Score: 1

    First tÃte-Ã-tÃte with Linux was with Puppy Linux on my old laptop... LiveCD.

  238. Hoping like hell I didn't break anything by aj50 · · Score: 1

    Linux was something I'd heard of which sounded cool and was free so I thought I'd try it out.

    I downloaded the three RedHat 9 CDs, read the installation manual very carefully and then installed it on the family PC, hoping like hell I didn't break windows or make the thing unbootable (backups? what backups?).

    I messed around with it for a bit, liked it mostly but was too attached to windows software. Later I received a PC for myself from a family friend with a hideously broken install of windows ME. I didn't have a Windows CD at the time so I installed RedHat 9 briefly, then found, downloaded and installed Ubuntu and never looked back.

    --
    I wish to remain anomalous
  239. Slackware in 95 by FuzzyHead · · Score: 1

    My first experience was Slackware in 95. By then one of my friends and I had downloads all the packages and had well over a hundred 3.5" disks to install from.

    One thing I remember was on my machine X never was working. I probably spent well over 100 hours trying to get it to work, but I had a very obscure video card at the time. I finally went back to windows, but kept my eye on linux. In 2000 I was able to create a server with a P166 that ran linux. It was amazing. Since then I've used linux for servers and backend work and windows for all my desktops (for games and ease of use for visitors).

  240. Please post your fantasies to Penthouse, not /. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    A girl, a girl with a boyfriend and later a husband actually meddled with Linux. Fanatasize about such things, but if you want to post them, please do so at the appropriate venue like Penthouse. /. is for real down to earth stuff. bah!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  241. broken CDs by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    A friend mailed me some Red Hat CDs, but they broke in the mail, so I bit the bullet and spent a week downloading replacements. I stayed on windows, but it was great as a web/ftp server.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  242. Yggdrasil? by 6er · · Score: 1

    First linux I downloaded was early 1.x Slackware. Many floppies. The first I recall messing with was Yggdrasil. I ran minix on my Atari ST at the time, and UNIX at work so got my *nix fix there. When I bought an x86 machine for home, I started with NetBSD 0.9, then FreeBSD 1.*, 2.*,OS/2 Merlin, Warp, Solaris x86, Redhat 5,SuSE 7.x,Fedora, and now Ubuntu (under Vmware on the Mac). Next step is Angstrom on the Beagleboard....

    --
    -- My brain is just a BUNDLE of nerves...!
  243. Wonder what I did wrong. by Zillatron · · Score: 1

    I couldn't figure out where the GUI was. All I had looked like a DOS prompt to me. I wiped the drive and tried again. The next day I got to the part of my book that covered X.

  244. hlds.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to get a HLDS for Counterstrike 7.x to run and I wanted this shiny penguin to appear in the local game server list.

    I started out with wuftpd (*shiver*), SSH (of course) and HLDS/CS obviously. This took me quite some time. Back then I used RedHat 6.3. My first contact with Linux was Corel Linux (1.0?).

  245. linux/windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So i started with linux in 94, and have been using it ever since until recently. I started using Windows for the first time..and I am so impressed I feel like I've largely been missing out. It is exciting if not more exciting than when I first discovered linux, a completely different ecosystem, with both bad and good sides..I don't think I'll be switching back though even if it was a good ride.

  246. Oooh I remember! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    I downloaded the Slakware floppies at work (*ahem*) while doing tech support on the OS/2 hotline. Only I forgot to download the first 2 floppies as binary so I had to wait until the next day to snag them. I installed it on my shiny 386SX/16 which had a whopping 2MB of RAM. The video card was sub-par so I just ran a terminal until a few years later when I could afford to upgrade to a 486. Compiling the kernel took overnight, and that was back when the kernel source was under 10MB!

    I also remember the hullabaloo when the kernel source started to approach 10MB! We postulated that the linux kernel source could destroy the Internet! There was much debate about removing less-used drivers from the main tree...

    Now get off my lawn, you damn kids!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  247. It was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in 1998 (I was a college student) I bought a copy of Corel Linux at the campus bookstore. After installation, and a frustrating hunt for how to run the desktop, I gave up when I was not sucessfull getting it tom work with my high speed internet.

    I trued again in 2006. I started with A Knoppix live CD, and a Harv's Hamshack Hack (a custom version of knoppix with many priograms removed, and lots of Ham radio related software pre-installed) live CD. Then I found Kanotix. I ran that for a while, until sidux came along, and there hadn't been a full update to Kanotix for more than a year. I still run sidux, as well as having tried quite a few other Distros (mostly Debian based) along the way. I do have a multiboot system that includes Windows XP. Xp is only used for games, and is blocked fron the internet by my router.

    TTYL

  248. Destroyed the partition table by Jeian · · Score: 1

    Destroyed the partition table on the family computer. This was about 10 years ago before there were easy ways to handle partitioning, and I used some nice friendly programs that allowed you to directly manipulate cylinder/head/sector numbers. At 12 years old, I did not have the necessary skills to do this correctly the first time.

    My parents weren't thrilled about that one, especially since once you've messed up your computer by manually editing the partition table, most technicians will scratch their heads and say "lol wut."

  249. I use FreeBSD by shmach · · Score: 1

    you insensitive clod!

  250. Softlanding by EvilAlphonso · · Score: 1

    My lawn, get off it ;)

    I switched to Yiggdrasil Beta as soon as it was available to order and then Debian 0.93 (IIRC, need to check the CDs). I still have the pressed CDs for all the distributions I installed until broadband finally became accessible in my neck of the woods.

    What did I do first? I fell in love with Linux and changed career path from code monkey to console monkey. No regrets whatsoever, those years have been a blast and brought me cash aplenty.

  251. Sadly, I installed BitchX by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, I was addicted to EFNET and I had tired of the 'winnukes' (port139 Windows NETBIOS DoS), ping floods, and all the other Windows based problems that caused "error 42: connection reset by peer".

    I tried BSD 4.2(??), and RedHat 4 (again, ??) Those memories are pretty slim, though.

    Ironically, the second thing I did was compile coke.c, and pepsi.c. Heh.

    1. Re:Sadly, I installed BitchX by bgd73 · · Score: 1

      I also went that route, compiled software for the first time, I liked eggdrop bots, and was introduced to TCL, which has been in all my windows os since it began for me in 1999.I seem to be much younger then in actions than I am now of course. After the redhat 6* kernel hacks, I ran from linux. Original TCL however remains my einstein. Coincidental to this question: I recently have setup a vc++ ide and compiled extensions for my own programming with tcl very much the heart of it. It has been fun to learn.

    2. Re:Sadly, I installed BitchX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft.. DALnet and ircii are THE network and THE client.

    3. Re:Sadly, I installed BitchX by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, man, so much fun. I forgot about that - I had a dialup to a campus server running Solaris at the time, and writing a script to run through channels and send winnukes to everyone on the list. Ah, going to #mirc and watching most of the channel drop off the net. h0h0h0. Nothing like a fresh Windows bug to exploit.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  252. Tried to get graphics right by louzer · · Score: 1

    Redhat 6's graphics setup auto-configured a very bad screen resolution for me using VESA or something. So I was trying to set it right. Then I tried to use my Winmodem (an internal dial up modem which had no drivers). Then I tried to mount my windows partition.

    --
    Heroes die once, cowards live longer.
  253. 2008: Ubuntu Live by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    I've been a Windows user/programmer since 3.0 in the late '80s and have had various machines at home, all running some form of Windows, from 3.1 thru 95, 98SE, 2000 and currently XP Home and Professional.

    In 2008, I got a wireless router from my ISP when my broadband got upgraded, so I tried using my old laptop for using MSN for video calls with the webcam. Performance under Windows was not great, so I thought I'd try out Ubuntu, as I'd heard (time and time and time again !) it was more efficient than Windows on older hardware.

    Downloaded the ISO for 8.04 and the Live install was the first stumbling block. The screen seemed split into three or more vertical strips. Solution: enable 'Safe Graphics' mode and try again.

    I have to say that the partitioning/installation phase was very smooth and friendly - well done, Canonical.

    Using all the supplied apps was a doddle, too - just like any other self-respecting desktop OS.

    Right, now to get serious and get ourselves online ! Plug in my USB WiFi dongle - nothing. Nada. Zilch. After a lengthy dig around the net (using my Windows desktop machine), I bit the bullet, steeled myself and attempted a recompile of ndiswrapper using the Windows drivers for the dongle. Well, I didn't bargain for having to install build-essential (thankfully available via apt-get and the 8.04 CD) and other crap. Let's just say that this stage was not "ready for Joe Sixpack". (To be fair, Ubuntu has progressed and 9.04 detects the same dongle out-of-the-box - very impressive).

    OK, now to get my USB Webcam working. You jest, right ? Moving on...

    I have to say that I really can't tell any difference in performance between Ubuntu and Windows XP on that laptop. If anything, video response is better under Windows - YouTube full screen makes the fans go into overdrive all the time with Ubuntu, whereas they pause for breath every now and then with Windows.

    Music software/hardware ? Forget it ! Even something simple like getting a USB MIDI interface to talk to an app is a lost cause.

    So is there anything I like better under Ubuntu on the laptop ? I have to say no, not really. An interesting geek experiment, but Windows 'just works' and actually 'just works better' for most things. I've since reverted to XP SP2 on that machine.

    At the same time as I installed it on my laptop, I decided to partition my desktop machine and make a dual-boot between XP SP3 and Ubuntu 8.04. This installation went a lot more smoothly, with all attached hardware being detected out-of-the-box (no Wi-Fi, just an ethernet cable straight into the router). I set myself the goal of using Linux exclusively by the end of the month (really to force myself to find a non-Windows solution rather than taking the path of least resistance and just booting back into the familiar territory of Windows) and started compiling a list of tasks that I use Windows for on a day-to-day basis.

    Office apps were every bit as good as Windows, which is no surprise as I use OO.o on both !

    Printer drivers were a bit less intuitive and a bit less WYSIWYG in Linux; I still prefer Windows when I want to get a photo or document 'just right' these days. The scanner on my HP all-in-one printer/copier/scanner required a package from the repository, IMSC, but after that it behaved flawlessly.

    Once again, music hardware and software was a dead loss. Even something simple like playing a General MIDI file from a webpage eludes me to this day. Forget something more involved, like running Propellerheads Reason on a Digidesign M-Box interface. Musicians/producers/DJ's who value their sanity should stick with Windows or OSX.

    BitTorrents are a joy, and one of the things that I've stuck with Ubuntu for: Just click on the Torrent link and Transmission fires up immediately. You can throttle download and upload speeds very easily and the overall sense of control is excellent.

    Apt-get - or rather the GUI equivalent, Synaptic - is another joy to use. It's just like an all-you-can-eat software buffet !

    --
    Squirrel!
  254. Wrote a paper in LaTeX by billlion · · Score: 1

    It was about 1997 and it was the tenth time Windows had crashed while I was trying to write a ten page mathematical paper in Word. The equation editor had created an embedded formula of infinite size so I could not save the file. I did n't know which equation it was so I had to save bits of the file at the time. My colleague Eddie Wilson helped me install Red Hat 4.2 and I vowed only to write in LaTeX and not to use Windows from then onwards.

  255. xfree86 alpha 92/93 by LexJ · · Score: 1

    Sometime in late 92 or 93 I downloaded a copy of Linux from a BBS onto 13 floppy disks. I was able to get it installed and running, but since the only exposure I had had to a unix command line was from using the internet I remember sitting there not knowing what to do next. Eventually I started poking around and saw some reference to an alpha version of xwindows so I got to work installing that. After some hours X was working and I was again in unfamiliar territory, staring at a black and white screen with an X cursor that would move around with my mouse. Eventually I got the one X app that was included in the distro running. It was a 3D wireframe app where you could draw shapes and articulate them. About the time I finished making a wireframe snake that was pretty cool, I noticed that I was bleeding from my eyes and ears so it was time to quit. From then on I made it a point to check out a version of Linux a couple of times a year. Finally, after 15 years of checking it out, I switch over from $MS Windows and started using Ubuntu as my main OS last fall.

  256. KyroII by ilikejam · · Score: 1

    The first thing I ever did on Linux (RedHat 7.2) was find out how to unpack a driver tar.gz for my KyroII graphics card.
    Then I had to find out how to compile drivers.
    Then I had to find out how to install development RPMs.
    Then I had to find dependencies for the development RPMs.
    Then I had to find out how to start X.
    Then I had to find out how to configure X.

    Did I mention I was a Mac user before this?

    Had to install an early Solaris 10 on a PC some years later....

    --
    C-x C-s C-x k
  257. SLS, then Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I downloaded my first SLS distro, also as 1.44MB floppy images via 2400 baud modem, from a BBS in Dallas in February of 1993. This was at my first job fresh from college. Only three of us at this office were into Unix, and we all knew that this was the beginning of something big. Later that summer when Slackware 1.0 was released, it showed up in one of the local bookstores in a book/cdrom package, but 1.0.x has issues with the HP Vectra hardware we were trying to run it on, and by the time Slack 1.2 was released in spring of 1994, it would run good on the Vectras.

  258. Yes, I remember about eight months ago... by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu 8.04 looked pretty sweet, and seemed to be a good way to get away from Microsoft Windows. I spent months Googling how to partition a hard disk and dual-boot a computer. It worked very well; never had any major problems. Sometimes GRUB would break or something, but that was always easily fixed, and it probably always will be. :) After extensive Googling and talking with my Uncle (who knows a bunch about Linux), I finally installed on...I think the date was 3 January 2009. And it was beautiful. I'd been playing with Live CDs, but installing to my hard disk was such a great feeling. :D

    Last night, I wiped my whole hard disk and let it install Jaunty using the default option. I have a 1.66 GHz dual core CPU, 2 GB of RAM, and 36 seconds from power button to login screen. I don't know if it's Jaunty's optimizations, the swap space that I've never used before, or the fact that it's sitting closer to the edge of the hard disk, but this is beautiful.

    Makes me wonder why Microsoft doesn't do a feature freeze and focus solely on optimization, stability, and security for a version or two of Windows.

    P.S.: I have learned a hell of a lot more about computers in the past three and a half months outside the classroom than I have in it. Linux is like a mini CS course, I think.

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  259. Used it as an X terminal to a NetWare 4.11 server by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    As crazy as it sounds, it's true: there was an NLM for accessing through X a certain NetWare admin application (whose name now escapes me). So I tried to install Slackware 3.something and succeeded at first try, and off I was.

    The whole Slackware experience was so surprisingly easy and consistent, that later RedHat Linux felt very clunky and buggy. Yeah, it kinda worked and tried to be kinda user-friendly, but it has dozens of unpleasant bugs, inconsistencies, and generally, it didn't allow me as much control as Slackware.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  260. Ubuntu live CD by Cinnaman · · Score: 1

    I tried to make Gnome look more like Windows. I tried an Ubuntu live CD (version 4 I think) that was on the front of a magazine, I still muck around various distros from time to time but the only use I've found for it is as a rescue disc.

  261. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    It was RedHat 5.(something?) for me... I know. I'm a freaking noob here it seems. I installed using a CD, not the floppies like all you.

    But my first experience after getting it up and running, was getting the NIC drivers loaded (I had a classic tulip card). That was easy. I then wanted to figure out what I was going to do... So I logged into one of the IRC channels that I normally talked on, and got immediately booted because I was running as root.

    That was my first lesson in computer security.

  262. Edgy Eft on a Pentium 200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a new PC and figure I could finally get around to play with Linux now that I had a spare system I could mess up without affecting my workflow. So I downloaded the latest Ubuntu distro, a couple of years ago, I didn't want anything complex.

    It took about 6 hours to install and it refused to recognize the serial mouse. It was also sluggish as all hell.

    OK, I told myself, this is an 8 years old system and Ubuntu is asking too much of it, even if it does run more smoothly in an older system than an equivalent Windows system (which would have been XP SP2 at the time). This machine used to run Windows Me without a hitch (yeah, I know, I know, but I never had any problems with it).

    So I got Xubuntu and tried again. And to make a long story short, after several days of 6- to 8-hours long installs that wouldn't recognize my mouse and would run slower than Me, and endless hours spent rumagging around help forums, I gave up.

    Last year I gave away that old system after installing Me again on it.

    Eventually I installed Fedora in a newer system and made my peace with Linux, but that first experience made me really weary about it all.

  263. uhhhh.. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    it's been almost a decade ago-
    I took verbal instruction to type
    "rm *.idx" which somehow became
    something like "rm * .idx" which wound up removing a whole lot more than it should have...
    it's been so long, I forget exactly what the extra character was...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  264. First time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still remember my first time with Linux... it felt like a bag of sand.

  265. SLS from Shareware CD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Installed the SLS distribution some time in early 1993, from a shareware CD-rom "Night Owl".

    At the time, I was using DOS, and without fully grasping the potential, Linux was like "DOS with multiple screens" (the virtual consoles). It was my first experience with any Unix-like system, and I was sold to it immediately. I read all the shareware texts I could about Linux and Unix commands, and saw what a big step-up it was from DOS scripting + Turbo Pascal programming.

    I went momentarily back to DOS, and then OS/2, and then very shortly Windows95 - until in 1995, when I made the jump onto Slackware. Today its Ubuntu, but have had Linux as my main system since then.

  266. Installed a print server by diamont · · Score: 1

    My daughter and I installed a print server years ago. Just the other day I tried the lastest distro of ubuntu. I still ask my self why people act like linux is something special. It's just an OS that isn't as useful as other OS's. A decade or so ago it was lean and quick, now a full install with the GUI is shockingly slugish on my old machine.

  267. The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by cptnapalm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the 1997th year, much Quaking was being done by myself, a young 2ltnapalm. I fragged and it was good. Yet not all was well in the land of the rocket launcher. There was this fell beast, Windows 95, which ever was watchful for any joy in the world, existing only to bring the blue hell to the screens of the earth.

    "Surely, there cannot be this misery alone for the computers of the earth. For in the earlier days of home computing I cast off Windows 3.0, who was then but a pretender operating system, for DOS 5. But Windows has grown more ambitious if not more useful and its infection spreads wide and no retreat to DOS does it permit. Tell me, Quakers, are their no alternatives to this dreck? And speak not of MacOS, for it is a joke."

    Out of the depths of IRC, from the servers of EFNet, the oracles of #quake did speak.

    "Linux. For it is stable and the Carmack has decreed that Quake shall run upon it with joy in its heart."

    "Carmack the Wise is a powerful programmer and much does he understand. Hark, I shall give this Linux thing a shot."

    To the merchant Computer City, I did go and they had a boxed copy of Red Hat 4.2 (if my memory does not betray me) which I did buy. Upon returning to my abode, I did begin preparations for the installation upon my whitebox. Partitioning was simple enough. The choices which one needed to make were not difficult, but to one who was but yet a pup it, it was so foreign. Eventually, perseverance and much RTMFing did triumph. Linux was installed. But one other thing must be done. X.

    Many were the incantations invoked and the curses hurled due to X. Long days were spent editing text and typing that accursed startx only to find my work in vain. And yet did I endure for I knew that Windows 95 was cackling in the darkness of Redmond, awaiting my defeat to consume my soul should I fail and never again would I be able to hold my head high amongst the geeks of the realm.

    Always teetering on the edge of disaster, but never managing to destroy my machine (which the pages of man ensured me was possible), I one day found something new. Something unexpected. For after messing with mode lines and color depths and other things arcane, startx worked. A graphical user interface was mine!

    "My heart doth rejoice in this success! I shall install Window Maker and Enlightenment and many others besides so that I may never be bored with the look and feel of this machine, for that is the crowning glory of this victory: I can have any UI I desire."

    Feeling very pleased with myself, I looked over all I surveyed with great confidence, yet the victory was not mine alone. For this unnamed box had endured much in the trials of installation. Yes. "Endured much beyond the reckoning of the typical home computer," said I, "and not just endured, but thrived and in the coming days shall have many challenges to overcome, so henceforth let this machine be known as tankgirl!"

    Many were the adventures of tankgirl and, now, ltnapalm. Running a website over a cable modem, a MySQL database server, and numerous other tasks that tankgirl did perform, singing all the while with her K6 233 and 128 megabytes of RAM. In time, helper machines were obtained so that less interesting tasks tankgirl would not have to do herself, for her processing time was valuable and wasted on other tasks. A 486 there was, scorned by many as out of date and useless, now raised from its nadir to its apex with Linux installed and became a mighty wall of fire, shielding the local area network from the depredations of script kiddies and other wearers of the black hat of crackerdom.

    Many were the nooks and crannies that cptnapalm and tankgirl delved into together, from dabbling in C programming and shell scripting to kernel compilation and switching to Debian. Together we witnessed the horrors of sendmail.cf and learned the mysteries of bind. And Quake there was, of course, too.

    After long years, time did takes its toll and its toll was death. Impoverishment prevente

    1. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by freespac3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just wanted to say that was brilliant.

      To tankgirl. *toast*

      --
      Better to regret something you have done, then something you haven't.
    2. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by anjilslaire · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Awesome. Just. Awesome. May I repost this elsewhere, with credit given?

    3. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      Have at it :)

    4. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny as I had had a C64 and a 386 previously, but they were just machines. Installing Linux on a whitebox just opened up a whole world of possibility.

    5. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      And not a dry eye left in the place. A toast!

      To tankgirl. Never forgotten. And a fine eulogy.

    6. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by scruffy · · Score: 1

      Bravo!

      It seemed like an eternal struggle to edit .XF86config into something X would bless. Every new version of RH ensured another tussle. And I remember a 200K partition for Redhat 4.2, which was more than plenty for the time.

    7. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by schamarty · · Score: 1

      I had goosebumps and moist eyes, and thought it was just me being a sentimental idiot...

      Nice to know there're others!

    8. Re:The Adventures of cptnapalm and tankgirl by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      And you, to whom adversity has dealt the final blow
      With smiling bastards lying to you everywhere you go
      Turn to, and put out all your strength of arm and heart and brain
      And like the fair maiden tankgirl, rise again.

      Rise again, rise again - though your heart it be broken
      Or life about to end.
      No matter what you've lost, be it a home, a love, a friend,
      Like the fair maiden tankgirl, rise again.

  268. 1997, RHL 4.1, gimp by burnin1965 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first experience installing and using linux was with Red Hat Linux 4.1. It was mostly out of curiosity as my younger brother had been using linux but I didn't expect much from a free operating system. At the time I was running Windows 95, Windows NT 4 and OS/2 Warp 4 on the same box so I was already well prepared the difficulties of a multi-boot setup and using a diversity of operating systems.

    Its been awhile but I don't recall any major issues with the installation. It definitely required more tweaking than the other operating systems to get a working desktop, but as pretty much anyone in this forum knows there is a high probability of install difficulties with almost any operating system when you build a custom system rather than purchase a pre-installed system.

    I don't recall the window manager I used at the time but it was a functional desktop albeit not as polished as Windows or OS/2. But something interesting happened, I found Gimp.

    I had a large flatbed color scanner on a SCSI bus that I used in Windows and OS/2. In Windows I used the applications that shipped with the scanner and for OS/2 I purchased an image editing program, I don't recall the name anymore, in both cases the applications absolutely refused to use the full size of the scanner. The scanner was a full legal size 8.5x14 but the proprietary applications would only allow up to 8.5x11 scans. With a little research I found there were applications available for purchase that would use the full scan size but I was not in dire need of full legal size scans so I held off on the purchase.

    When I used Gimp+SANE with the flatbed scanner it allowed complete legal size scans! My eyes were opened. In the proprietary closed source software world the extra scan size required extra cash, which seemed ludicrous and disingenuous as I doubt it required any significant code changes to implement, but in the open source world the software was written to take full advantage of the hardware's capabilities and it was FREE!

    At that point I was sold. By 2003 I was only running linux based operating systems, my laptop, three desktops in the house, a couple of firewalls/routers and a few servers. During this time I have become progressively aware of the ridiculous demands of the closed source proprietary software vendors. They have become sick and demented on their own greed to the point where they've twisted the purpose of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution from "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" into some bizarre protected and perpetual revenue stream. In this upside down world created by closed source software vendors research and development capital is spent not to advance the science or art but instead to create false limitations on there proprietary applications capabilities to create equally false product price points.

  269. Oh Unix by shellster_dude · · Score: 1

    Way back in the day, I decided that I would figure out what this unix thing was. Someone had given me a copy of some version of it. I spent two weeks getting that damn thing running, and that was with an exhaustive guide. Course most of the time was spent compiling everything on a 386. Once I got it all running, I was too ignorant of such things to really accomplish much more than basic tasks with it. So I quickly got frustrated with it and went back to windows 3.1.

    Fast forward to today, where I run Ubuntu for my main computer, debian on my servers, and my windows computer only gets used for gaming.

  270. Email by Majestix · · Score: 1

    In a move that, in hindsight, was eriely prohpetic i set up a uucp mail server. I was teaching myself C when a coworker gave me a copy of this disk based unix tutorial. I thought it was neat and then began hunting around for a full version of the os. Mind you, this was 1992 or so. I even remember sending 3 boxes of 3.5" floppies to someone somewhere who copied a version of slackware for me and sent them back. Loved the OS ever since.

    --
    --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
    1. Re:Email by Majestix · · Score: 1

      Oh, i say prophetic because i've spent the last 8 years or so as an email administrator. Though unfortunately its Microsoft Exchange....

      --
      --- I was far from home, and the spell of the Eastern sea was upon me. -Lovecraft-
  271. Downloading the floppies (on an HP-UX machine)... by mce · · Score: 1

    ... and during installation on my good old 386 having to manually edit byte 508 (IIRC) of the boot sector in order to boot from the hard disk. Gosh, I'm getting old....

    PS: That 386 box is still operational today (over 17 years later)! It's just not connected to anything anymore.

  272. Tried to get modem to work. by Molochi · · Score: 1

    It was around 1997-98 and I just downloaded a version of slackware on floppy to mess around with. Boot, Root, and a bunch of other disk images. I had worked with unix and xenix so it wasn't alien to me. I seem to recall driving around trying to find a PCI based 56K hardware modem around that time and finding none.

    A couple of years later I looked at many of the distros that were being given away on CD. I put a Redhat box on dialup duty first off, and had it route a simple LAN on a cheap 10Mb hub and even acted as a firewall. I remember trying Mandrake but wasn't much interested in a desktop linux box. Gaming required a Windows98 box and later Win2k and later still WinXP and my work box went from WinNT4 to Windows2000 to WinServer2003.

    Today I try to keep an 12GB Ubuntu install on anything with Windows and internet access. It's just too useful to not do it and IMO stupid not to. A lot of my stuff in the background is Linux (HTPC and servers). I spend about a third of my time on the Ubuntu side now that it's got semi-proper support for videocards and most filetypes. However, I like to set most of my machines to suspend to memory and that often determines what I run when I sit down at them...
       

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  273. Homework by EXTomar · · Score: 1

    The university I went to school had a Unix system but to access it you'd either need to be in the CS building or access it through a 14.4 modem via the terminal server. When crunch time came the thing was always overloaded. At about the same time Linux was just hitting 1.0 and supported gcc which was perfect for homework. In this case, necessity was the mother of installation.

  274. Groping at a party with SLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time was the two-disk boot/root SLS set, the 1992-3 equivalent of a "live CD". Being in college, this tryst lasted about three days and SLS and my PC went their separate ways.

    By the end of the week, Slackware had moved in with my PC and kicked Windows to the curb.

    That relationship lasted until around 1995 when Slackware wasn't interested in a menage a tois with my PC and DEC Alpha machines. Slackware was out on the curb and Red Hat moved in for a good run. They eventually formed a commune and had many more machines and eventually the young stud Fedora took over the place and Red Hat went out to pasture.

  275. boot order "C:, A:" not a good idea by scotsghost · · Score: 1

    I screwed up my first install and left the hard disk unbootable. Easy recovery, right? Boot from floppy and reinstall lilo.

    Except there was a BIOS flaw. If the boot order was "C:, A:" instead of "A:, C:", the system only booted from floppy if the hard disk was not present. If it was present but not bootable, it would just halt and never failed over to try booting from the floppy. (This was late '95, with a 486 that had never heard of booting from CDROM.)

    Oh, did I mention I'd passworded my BIOS and forgotten the password?

    Yeah, not so smart.

    My machine ("jefry", with one "f") spent the next month completely dissassembled. I knew I had to clear the CMOS memory, but couldn't figure out how. There was supposed to be a jumper I could use. Eventually I figured out that the jumper contacts were present but the pins weren't installed (in '95, tech support had access to motherboard specs!!) and managed to bridge the contacts with a paperclip.

    And that was just to get the machine to boot from the floppy drive so I could get back to my Windows install. Even after getting lilo installed properly, it took another couple of months to get to a working slackware install. I learned a lot, though.

    And I never passworded another BIOS.

    1. Re:boot order "C:, A:" not a good idea by brackishboy · · Score: 1

      "And it occurred to me as he drove away, D=R*T" Great record :)

  276. 3 days of pain by meerling · · Score: 1

    Yes, I remember the first time I used linux.
    It was 3 days of pain and frustration.
    I couldn't get the kernel to compile no matter what I did.
    After a couple hours of hair pulling, I called a friend of mine who had installed linux hundreds of times. He was with me for the next several days as we both went insane trying to get that to work.
    In the end, we had to give up, linux wouldn't work no matter what we did. It definitely wasn't ready for users if professional techs and consultants couldn't get it to work on a standard machine.

    Of course, things are much better now. I haven't had a problem like that in ages, and the installers are infinitely superior now. I'd even let some of the moderately adept users install linux if they wanted to. So before going off on a rant about the (imaginary) perfection of linux, just remember that it wasn't that many years ago it was a major pain in the @** and impossible for a non-techie to deal with.

    1. Re:3 days of pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you try to compile a kernel at all if you were starting out? You obviously picked a fail distro.

  277. ftp site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in 98ish, i ran a warez ftp site (affiliated with RNS and APC release groups), using slackware and glftpd

    1. Re:ftp site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah nice, i ran the RNS ftp site WD (world domination) for a quite a few years, while i was employed at rit.edu .

      The site sat on an 100mbit->OC3 wan link, and at the time had a terabyte of mp3 (fairly large at the time) . We pushed hundreds of gigs a day over RITs net link..

      Nitecrew (ex RNS)

  278. The first thing I did with Linux was.... by jimpop · · Score: 1

    The first thing I did with Linux was backup the 3 floppy disks it came on (Redhat, circa 1995)

  279. There's a woman on slashdot? by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    and she can get a date? I'd sooner expect a tear in the space-time continuum.

  280. It didn't go so well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually just installed Ubuntu 9.04 for the first time, on one of my two installed hard drives. The installation appeared to go well, until it rebooted. Grub then gave me an Error 21, which was great.

    When I finally got past that and was able to get my computer to boot again (earlier today), I realized that Ubuntu wouldn't support a standard widescreen resolution for my video card (GeForce 6800 GT PCI) and monitor (Standard Acer Widescreen LCD). It took 2 hours of fiddling with an Ubuntu super-user to get the display working right- and he's still not sure how he did it.

    My Windows XP installation still works fine, as it always has. ...but Linux is better, amirite?

  281. Well how can by capedyeats · · Score: 1

    I forget my Red Hat 5.2 installation (relative latecomer) and haven't looked back since and still continue with Fedora and unable to get past the Red Hat way. I remember learning the fundamentals of computers from the ground up as it should be... However, Linux was more profound in my life since it enabled this Political Science/History to have a career. A lot of employers were impressed with the fact that I knew Linux well because when you learn this sublime OS, you learn a lot more like Apache, Mysql and more importantly the Open Source community. It can be said that next to my son's birth the Linux installation is the most important moment of my life...

  282. i learned....the hard way....now... by insanius · · Score: 1

    like many others that i've read here, my virgin experience with linux came in the form of many sleep deprived nights of reading and recompiling the kernel of a Slackware 8.1(9?) install. i did this at the recommendation of my peers as i was green to *NIX and the only experience i had with anything other than windows systems at the time was hacking my class projects on Solaris dummy terminals.

    i joined the RUSLUG(http://ruslug.rutgers.edu/w/) and the great majority of them suggested this route. now i realize that this was a nerd hazing....however, the knowledge and familiarity with the inner workings of linux that i gained from those first couple of weeks is now priceless. not to mention that, once i perfected the process of configuring that machine, my sh!tty compaq presario laptop ran better than the day i brought it home...another added plus, my non-techy friends in the dorm were so thrown off by fluxbox, none of those virus magnets ever even tried to hop on my box anymore.

    anyway, what first became of that introduction is something that still makes me proud to this day: the Prism driver. thats right, i as involved with the project that brought many of you wireless g in linux for the first time. i was responsible for the config/admin tools and the sh!tty documentation to help you script your settings.

    no one who is familiar with it believes me when i tell them...until i make them bet on it and dig up notes and archived irc discussions...that got me many a free lunch over the years!

    while that was a great learning experience...it is not something i want to ever go through again. which is why i must say this: what i first do with linux now is discouraging considering how long it's been since i worked on the prism project, how successful it was, and how far linux has come since then.....most of the time the first thing i do after installing linux on a system is hop on my VISTA box and scour the internet trying to figure out how to get my god damned wireless working!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

    seriously....WTF!!!!!

  283. Network capabilities... by jayminer · · Score: 1

    It was 1996, I was 14. It was a Slackware 3.x CD from a PC magazine that I don't remember the name of. My PC was a 486.

    I gave it a try mainly because of its network capabilities.

    What capabilities? Malicious of course.. I was able to nuke'em all on the IRC!

  284. First Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first intro to Linux was in college. I'd been learning on a Solaris box at school and was having trouble with something... bash or awk scripting, I think. Anyway, I asked around if I could get my hands on a cheap copy of UNIX so I could study at home and a class-mate suggested Linux.

    My first Linux was a copy of Pygmy Linux (stripped down version of Slackware) which I downloaded onto five floppies. Pygmy was shell-only and ran on a UMSDOS filesystem, so no re-partitioning was required. Great way to learn the command-line basics without being thrown full into the Linux world.

  285. RH XX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first distro I experienced with was Red Hat Linux. My dad was into Linux and we got together and installed it on his brand new Toshiba Tecra 8000 with a 300Mhz PII processor and the RAM upgraded from 64MB to 256 (the max !!!).

    (That computer is right next to me trying to repair it's hard 8GB hard drive, btw, as I found it in a closet while cleaning out my house)

    I don't know exactly when the release date was on that but that was around that time.

    Later he showed me SuSE 8.2? (maybe 9.2), which I didn't really like, couldn't get it to do what I wanted to in WINE, and gave up rather quickly.

    I started becoming a hardcore linux user 2 years ago, when a friend of mine's dorm mate was becoming a hardcore linux user. He told me about ubuntu (feisty) which didn't work well with my ATI card. Then Gutsy came out and I used it solid up until the recent Jaunty release - where I'm having incompatible hardware dilemmas. I still keep windows around for compatibility sake (ie. new OS's on my black berry) and games, but I realized (and tried to tell others) that day to day daily activities can all be done in Linux. If you think about what a typical user does:
    - Listen to music
    - Watch Movies
    - Browse the series of tubes
    - get/send e-mail
    - Calendar program
    - Office suite
    - Folder view access (to porn)
    - IM

    ALL of those things are covered (some things, like music organizers, covered in HEAVY) in linux, among THOUSNADS of others GNU and other OSS programs. There's no reason to not use it for a day to day system. My usual method is keep windows on a big partition (games take up a lot), Linux (whichever flavor) can reside on a smaller, 20GB or so partition with no complaints, and then I make a big partition in the middle (usually format it as NTFS) for data storage, so both can access it. And it works great.

    I 3 linux, but I got really bored trying to get WINE to play my games correctly, so I always keep an XP install handy.

  286. Science! by Macblaster · · Score: 1

    Although my first exposure to Linux was much earlier, and was mostly spent learning how the basic commands differed from what I remembered from DOS, my first time actually doing something with Linux was during my undergraduate research, when I ran simulations of high energy particle collisions for the now depressingly delayed ATLAS experiment.

  287. My earliest Linux usage by avaric · · Score: 1

    Using X and XV on a 486 to view images generated by POV-Ray on Sparc 10. I learned a ton of stuff about bash, gcc, Linux, ftp, make, X. . . just so I could view a picture I created. And it wasn't even a good one. This was sometime in late 1994 I think.

  288. My first experience was in 1992? 1993? I forget. by aussersterne · · Score: 1

    and I was looking for some version of UNIX that I could afford to use at home as a computer science student. Someone pointed me to a thing called "Linix" posted on one of our departmental NFS servers. Turns out it was just kernel source... but it was like a light bulb going off and I asked around for more information.

    Soon enough I'd picked up a 386 machine from the university's surplus department and fitted it with 4MB RAM, 2MB of it on an ISA-bus memory expander card, and I was downloading floppy images from a local BBS. As I recall it was only a few boxes worth, not the hundreds of floppies that were required by the Slackware 3/4 era, when it was literally an all-day, all-night project to install linux, one floppy image at a time.

    My system had a 160MB ESDI hard drive that cost me a fortune, 4MB i386, with a 640x480 Tseng Labs VGA card and an old, square, super-clicky Logitech serial mouse. The satisfaction of seeing X+TWM+Emacs on my home display was sooooo immense I thought I'd faint.

    Within a number of months I'd expanded to a 640x480x256-capable card and gotten ahold of Mosaic and was using Term from a shell login to create an RFC1918 IP address for myself and connect to the interweb... where almost nothing existed, so mostly I still used Gopher, Archie, Veronica, Jughead, etc. and used Linux mainly for the "work" of getting a VT100 login session to my school, so that I could code and test my code on their superfast supernew Sparc 10 machines. :-D

    They were fun days.

    I still have the Sun3 pizza box that was *meant* to be my first home UNIX box, before I heard about this "Linix" thing.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  289. Ubuntu For The Win by Inquisitor911 · · Score: 1

    Once, some critical .dll files had been deleted from the Windows XP Operating System on one of the shared computers in my house, rendering the system un-usable. Nobody had made any backups, and the XP Installation DVD was nowhere to be found. I didn't want to leave my family with an un-usable machine, so I bit the bullet and installed Debian Linux with Firefox(which I believe was branded IceWeasel at the time), OpenOffice, and some other essentials. After hearing feedback from my parents, I switched to Ubuntu (with the same apps) for the sake of user-friendliness.

  290. obligatory xkcd by DanZ23 · · Score: 1
  291. FTP by mail by WillKemp · · Score: 1

    The first time i used Linux was over a dialup terminal connection from a 286 running DOS, in Brisbane, Australia, in about August 1994. I quickly learnt about 'screen' and (for some inexplicable reason) i was a fan of emacs. I used lynx to browse what i could find of the web in those pre-google days.

    I installed Linux on my DEC (Digital Equipment Corp) Hinote laptop in 1995. I downloaded the files for the installation floppy disk set via the FTP by mail service that, as far as i remember, DEC operated in those days. That was a lot easier than FTPing them direct, over my dialup connection - as the mail only had to be downloaded from my ISP's server. I was in the UK at the time, and the ISP was Demon.

    I used the command line exclusively for a few months, until i bought a Unix book from a bookshop in Madras, India, and worked out how to set up X. And i've run Linux on all my laptops since then.

    1. Re:FTP by mail by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      And my first distro, of course, was Slackware.

  292. uninstalled it by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

    sometime in 1997, first thing I did after I got it was discover none of my devices were supported and uninstalled it.

  293. The first thing I did was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...uninstall it. I'm a PC!

  294. First... and second, third, 4th, 5th... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vividly remember the first thing I did when I fist installed Linux - Reinstalled it.

    And again. And again.

    Eventually I got it configured installed the way I wanted it, and it was ossom! \o/

  295. The Summer of LILO by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

    What did I do first with Linux? Install it.

    I gave yggdrasil a go, I guess that it was early to mid 90s. To be honest, I wasn't all that impressed with yggdrasil so I abandoned it fairly quickly. You've got to remember that I was used to Micro-Port Unix (a port of Sys V for the PC), which was more stable. It didn't have the X Windowing System on it but that wasn't a real problem for me back then.

    My next stop along the Linux trail was Redhat, circa version 5. That was a keeper. What did I do with it? Learn its web and database server capabilities. Learn how it differed from the various flavors of Unix that, as a software developer, I was already familiar with. I remember being pretty happy with the -R command line switch which Unix didn't have.

  296. Replaced a way-unstable NT server by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spring 2000, iirc. I'd been running a home NT4 mail / web server for about a year, and it was a royal pain in the ass. Half-life of about two weeks between bluescreens. Wednesday evenings dedicated to patches and defrags and reboots. Intermittent, unexplainable IIS freezes.

    I was contemplating dropping a couple $K on new hardware, mostly out of desperation. At the same time, I'd played with Linux a few times, liked it, and it already had a well-established rep for stability. This was also the time the first commercial distros were coming into their own. I finally decided to take the plunge and bought (yes, actually paid for) a copy of SuSE, v.5 I think.

    Steep learning curve; much swearing and regret; but when I finally put the beast online, it ran. For 14 months, and what finally killed it was a power failure too long for the UPS to handle.

    In the nine years since (going from SuSE on a slot-A Athlon, to Mandrake/Mandriva on a dual Athlon XP, to nine Ubuntu VMs on a pair of triple-core Phenoms) I've had exactly two software-related crashes, one due to a misconfigured driver, the other from a runaway app that filled up /var. Uptime for this latest interation, which went online in Dec. is 100%.

    And patch-the-server Wednesdays are a distant memory.

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  297. Installing gentoo by Landak · · Score: 1

    My first linux experience was installing (bootstrapping, iirc) Gentoo.

    Believe it or not, it wasn't my last!

    --
    My UID is prime. Is yours?
  298. Re: What Did You Do First With Linux? by t3c · · Score: 1

    Wrote some C code for faculty class in Operating Systems ... that was in 2000

  299. Where is my buddy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing I did when I set eyes upon that weird Bash-shell was porting Clippy to it.

  300. What did I do first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mom!

  301. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by CajunArson · · Score: 0

    Don't use Ubuntu if you want to configure things yourself... Try LFS (Linux From Scratch)
    Holy shit I hope your not a doctor:
        "That cut is too deep for a band-aid, the only other option is to amputate the limb"
    Dude, there are a bunch of other distros out there that allow for far more configuration than Ubuntu while also having nice amenities like an actual package management system. I personally have been using Arch Linux for about a month and I have been able to do a lot of customization that Ubuntu makes difficult without having to search the web for every single library dependency in existence. It's a little irresponsible to dump LFS directly on somebody who is just getting proficient with Ubuntu... in fact, LFS is cute if you want to get the basis for beginning your own distro, but frankly it's a waste of time for most end users since you really don't learn anything more about Linux by fighting incompatible package versions, despite what the ricers say.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  302. Linux got me into bioinformatics by airuck · · Score: 1

    I had a boring job at a contract lab in Switzerland. It was the middle of winter in 1998. I installed slackware on a laptop and learned C and Perl. I moved back to California to another boring job, but kept up. After two years and a lot of work, I became the head of bioinformatics at a startup biotech company. I taught Perl and bioinformatics courses at the local universities, but have stayed in industry ever since. I picked up a lot of skills along the way, from building HPC pipelines on clusters, RDBMS (postgres), serving up information through LAMP, and building novel pattern recognition and visualization systems.
    Linux is now second nature and my whole family uses it for computing and on various devices around the house. I can't imagine going without it

    --
    First entomology, then virology, and finally bioinformatics systems. Bugs follow me wherever I go.
  303. Slackware circa 1996 by cyberbill79 · · Score: 1

    Slackware circa 1996.

    Found it a bit difficult, but decided it was worth it. Had very limited disk space, so downloaded it and installed it in stages. It was going on the same computer it was downloaded on, so setup partitions for dual booting, downloaded very base system on my super fast 14.4k modem, copied it on to 3.5" floppies, installed. Now the base install had no inet support. sooo.... reboot back into windows 3.11, download the next package, copy to floppy, reboot, install, repeat. Eventually had enough of the system installed to do it directly in linux, however had to copy to floppy as I went to keep open disk space. Of course not everything worked right, X11 video card, sound card, etc... so began the kernel recompiling...

    MARK! fully installed system working within 2 weeks.

  304. Back when Noah was a Cabin Bwoy! by Dave_Jones · · Score: 1

    Back in 1996 I had a friend (just one) - did windows tech support for a living. One drunken night he was raving about this new OS - build your own machine, install your own free software!! ETC ETC. The upshot is I learned the hard way to build my own machines (I'm a chef) and got RH 4.2 installed with X after approximately a year of confusion. :-) - loved it! Even had a dude who's high up in Amazon now come help me out of my ignorance one day. It's a small world. I've never looked back.And thank you all those hackers.

  305. From USB to Crazy Glue to Kubuntu by Myrimos · · Score: 1

    I first tried Linux last year. I was in the US Air Force doing my 4-months in Iraq, and had just inadvertently destroyed my USB drive. The cable plug inside the drive housing had snapped clean off, I wasn't skilled (l33t, perhaps?) enough to re-solder it, and to my chagrin the Crazy Glue gambit met with limited success.

    When I took the USB drive apart however, the 2.5 inch drive itself was fine. Thought I,

    1: Cool, A 2.5 inch PATA. This drive will fit inside my laptop.

    2: The dudes over in the IT shop have a Drake version of Kubuntu floating around on CD. They'd probably let me borrow it.

    3: ...

    4: No profit whatsoever. I hated that crap. I could not figure out how to give myself root in X. Instead of prompting for [Password:], the X interface in Drake took great delight in the [You do not have permission to access this drive. Ha ha, you're screwed!] Learning to even use the interface was a task in itself, I JUST WANTED TO LOOK AT PICTURES OF WOMEN ON MY COMPUTER! I kept at it though, because learning new things is fun, and switched over to Ubuntu once I got back to the US of A.

    And then dual-booted on my home machine.

    And then began installing it old computers around the house.

    And most recently, installed it on the toaster... seriously, though. I found that once I got past the learning curve, it was mostly easy to work with. Objectively, I can't even say the learning curve was worse than the Windows 95 curve was.

    --
    Internet scofflaw
  306. Yggdrasil, hacked up poorly by GarrettZilla · · Score: 1

    Installed Yggdrasil on my awesome new 486, 8 Megs of memory, 250 meg drive with the cool "ftape" tape drive.

    Anyway, to shrink its memory footprint, I recompiled the kernel with no networking. When I noticed that there was still networking code in it, I took matters into my own hands and started ripping out all the networking code that remained.

    After I compiled and booted THAT, it was noticeably smaller! But stuff like X quit working. Phooey.

    --
    Ecce potestas casei!
  307. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Nothing in ubuntu really stops you from compiling your own kernel if that floats your boat, it just means that other people can be productive on it if they choose without having to learn to do all that stuff.

  308. LPMUD 2.4.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I installed LPMud 2.4.5. I learned C style programming using on a mud.

  309. got my first computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one and a half year ago. i asked a friend to install Debian for me, because i did'nt even know where to put ram or disks then. this friend of mine is a very lazy person and additionally a Ubuntu fan-boy and dualbooter. he said he got no Debian, only Ubuntu and that Ubuntu is Debian and that i should also install Windows (on a pentium II!). i could talk him off the windows idea, which i found was a very bad one, but was still left with a primitive Ubuntu install, which means no config nor firewall etc. the first thing i did was changing the root password in gnome, after which i got locked out of my box and had to call my mate again. i really hated Ubuntu. it was ugly and stupid. at this time i was without internet access and it took me several weeks to get a Debian install cd (i stole it at a guys place - it was a Debian/Etch multi-arch DVD i teared out of his brand new Linux magazine...:-)). well, it took me severeal two weeks to manage a working Debian installation. since then it just got better and better. in the meantime i've learned tons of stuff and got me some nice Athlons. i write my own iptable/ebtables, compile my own kernels, installed Virtualbox and KVM on several computers and even got a working HURD installation (in a virtual machine with ssh!). on my lan there are: a backupserver (amanda), a web server (nginx), a web proxy (squid3), a diogenes server (for the TLG-E), a TNT server (for the German Wikipedia), a file server (proftpd, which i use to mount filesystems with curlftpfs/fuse on my desktops), a virtual machine (KVM) on which i use to start detached screen sessions automaticly to download tons of bittorrent stuff with aria2c, which again i suck on my main machine with netcat, a time server, a package cache (apt-cacher-ng), postfix/nmh for mail and all that shiny things for free! if i would have known what fun computers can be, i'd have for sure started earlier (i'm 31 now), but better late than never. the fun thing is, that my friend, an it guy who took 50 bucks for an crappy Ubuntu installation comes now to me, if he needs something with linux. i don't charge him though. linux is not about the money...

  310. linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modded my xbox :D

  311. Redhat 7.2 on 333Mhz with 56 meg RAM by FMZ · · Score: 1

    Seems that everyone has their own story. 4 pages of posts so far! Guess I'll throw in my two-pennorth It was 2003, and I was taking a basic IT course in which Linux surprisingly made an appearance. Back in the late 90s I had heard of this mythical creature called Linux (which I had only read about, and thus pronounced it Lie-nucks), and how amazing it was that you could customize anything you wanted. Unfortunately, I never had a computer to try it on back then, so when I finally had a computer, and an install CD, I was on my way. I'll never forget the trepidation with which I put the CD in that drive. The calm confidence as I found that a lot of my GUI knowledge in Windows transitioned very well, and that my programming experience treated me well on the command line. Before long, I had a working file and print server through Samba. That server has gone through a lot of iterations over the years. But, even after moving residence 4 times with the server, it has still maintained a 99.8% uptime from that very day. It now runs an apache web server, my personal email server, a proxy so I can browse the web from work, and a few other things. Also, I've run Linux as a desktop on and off for a number of years. First was Gentoo, then Fedora, then Ubuntu, now I'm onto Kubuntu, and I'll probably stay here. Kubuntu 9.04 is everything an OS should be.

  312. Yggdrasil by cybscryb · · Score: 1

    Middle of 1993 the Yggdrasil CD came in the mail. Took a fairly new PC (386) and dumped the Windows install and used that for Yggdrasil. Spent many nights playing around inside while learning Linux. I really can't remember but think there were five or six Windoze boxes that came and went while the old tower running Linux kept chugging along. Eventually ended up with a Sun Ultra 10 from surplus and found myself constantly wondering why Solaris didn't some of the things that Linux did. Testing some desktops to roll out at the University now. Liking Ubuntu but am letting the IT leadership team attempt to achieve the same result with OpenSolaris. For work productivity and compatiblity I use a Mac.

  313. The obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lynx hotsex.com

  314. Compiled a new kernel by Maggu · · Score: 1

    I compiled a new kernel. It was in the old dark days of Linux 1.2 and the module system didn't yet exist, so you had to recompile the kernel to get support for your hardware.

  315. My first time... by diefuchsjagden · · Score: 0

    was tri-booting with Red Hat Fedora Core, Win XP and Slackware, eventually killed everything in favor of Slackware, my computer got nuked from 6 months of inactivity and I have never gotten Slack to run quite right since.

  316. A quality system, at last! by eric.brasseur · · Score: 1

    I was told Unix systems are very complicated. This delayed my first Linux install for about two years. Then I saw a SuSE release installed by a friend who is not that smart at computers. I had ugly problems running the Microsoft C++ compiler. I remembered the neat C compiler of some university Unix workstations and got out buying a Red Hat release. I had to read to manual to install it and make some trial an error but it was overall quite easy. I installed the X server and ran the KDE 1 graphical interface. Then I rushed to the C++ compiler and... oh in heaven and grace, it accepted all my source code. No bugs, no problems. If something halted, it was always my fault and the solution was clear and immediate. One month later I started using the Qt API and planned that about six months would be necessary to get it under the knee. That same evening, everything I planned to do during those six months was finished and everything was a delight.

  317. Seeing a console prompt and don't know what to do by Amitz+Sekali · · Score: 1

    It's actually a similar experience with seeing DOS the first time. What the fuck I can do with this prompt..

    --
    If you delay pleasure infinitely, the pleasure will be infinite. (YM)
  318. MEPIS, to see what it was like by mcubed · · Score: 1

    I used Mepis Linux first, the liveCD version (which was also an install CD). I had been making a concerted effort for some time prior to use only OSS on Windows, and had pretty much succeeded with that. So I thought it was time I checked out an open-source operating system. D/l'ed and burned Mepis, booted into it, and viola. I liked it and though I hadn't planned to, went ahead and installed it on my HD, which was pretty painless, thank goodness, because I didn't have much of an idea of what was going on. I did, at least, understand what I needed to about partitioning.

    I think the only downside to the whole experience was that out-of-the-box KDE wasn't terribly well-configured back then and I thought it was ugly. Fonts, especially, were hideous. It was sometime later before I figured out that KDE can look quite nice, but I've never been much of a fan probably because of that first exposure.

    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
  319. slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ppp service wasn't yet available. The concept of an "ISP" was limited to business with frame relay. BBS's were what people with modems dialed into- and my university had their own that ran off a SYS-V/R3 Unix box.

    They also had a connection to something called the arpanet. There was something called gopher that let you navigate all sorts of information on how to make anything!

    I used my first linux install (kernel .9x) to create my own slip connection to that SYS V r3 box and ftp files right to my computer!!! Then in a few years I discovered Mosaic, and when it was too slow, Lynx. I think the first web site I ever visited was the NCSA web site- the second may have been an early version of Yahoo run out of stanford university.

  320. I figured out how to get it working ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    ... which was not particularly easy those days (no internet at home).

    It was an early SLS distro on a 286 IBM-clone.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  321. 1996: Serious Engineering Work is Done on Unix by srobert · · Score: 1

    I was an engineering student at UNLV in my early 30s. I was practically computer illiterate until I got a desktop system with Windows 3.11. I spent about a year fiddling with it, and read "PC's for Dummies", then got into some classes where I learned that most of the serious engineering work was done on something called "Unix". Someone told me that there was a version for PC's called "lynex" (or something like that). After a little research over the internet (which was still new to practically everyone), I ordered the Slackware 96 cds from Walnut Creek. I installed that on my desktop and then curiosity took hold of me. I couldn't resist hacking around to see how to make my machine do things that according to most of the competent PC people were too difficult to do without using expensive proprietary software. 13 years later, I've run Slackware, Red Hat, Suse, Debian, Ubuntu, and several times built Linux from Scratch systems. I got a new laptop a few months ago. Step One: Installed Kubuntu, Step Two: Removed Vista.

  322. I still have Slackware 3.0 in my archives. by fredc97 · · Score: 1

    It's the Walnut Creek with 2 CDs from 95, before that Yggdrasil and SLS were other popular choices. But the first memories I have of linux were of kernel compiles, trying to optimize every BogoMips out of a Cyrix 486DLC system. That was back in 1993 when the kernels ran in the 0.99

    Some other fun memories were modifying the assembly code to support a Bocaboard IO AT/66 because I could support 6 external modems with this baby and migrate my BBS from Deskview to linux. Ah the pain trying to allocate 6 IRQs for all my serial needs.

  323. MOO! by JasonNolan · · Score: 1

    It was 95 or so, and I got a computer out of the garbage that used to belong to the chair of our department (new phd student), slapped RH on it and loaded up LambdaMOO. THose were the days.

    --
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2013.808365
  324. My First Time by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    I started with Linux around RedHat 4.something. I'd subscribed to cable internet in 1998 and needed a better way to share the connection across the network. I took an old Compaq Presario 200MHz Pentium Pro machine and installed Linux on it and used IP Masquerading so all my machines on the network could share the connection. It wasn't until later that I heard that getting Linux to work on Compaqs was considered very difficult. I think I got lucky.

    Anyhow, the machine ran quietly under the shelf for months, to the point where I even forgot it was there. I didn't start using Linux on the desktop until around 2005, and have been using it almost exclusively since 2007. Yes, there are plenty of hassles, stupid problems and other annoyances, but after using Microsoft products for more than 25 years (I even used DOS 1.1 briefly), I know I'm definitely not worse off in the long run, and I'm not subject to the utter arrogance and contempt with which Microsoft treats its customers.

    When something doesn't work in Linux, it might be to misconfiguration on my part, incompetence on the developers' part, lack of documentation by a hardware manufacturer, sabotage of standards by Microsoft or some other company, or any of a number of reasons. However, it is never because the person who wrote the software is trying to lock me in, restrict me, force me to pay money for things I don't want or need, or maintain their monopoly and avoid competition. That knowledge alone makes the inconveniences, hassles and difficulties I experience with Linux far less burdensome than when it happens with Microsoft.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  325. Bout 1 year by llamasniper · · Score: 1

    Well, I started using Linux about a year ago, I installed ubuntu 5.10 on my old dell '98 and the first thing I noticed was that I didn't have to install any new drivers to make it work right!!1 I'm still a complete newbie at Linux, but I enjoy learning more about it, and know more than the Microsoft fanboys who tried Linux and said it was too difficult to use because they couldn't upgrade to openoffice3.0 or install anything. I now have ubuntu 9.04 on a 3 month old PC that I built myself. I think the first thing that I actually DID with my first Linux install was to immediately try out every single program that I could find. Of course this became a problem because most of the new programs don't run on 5.10, and that became a problem which as since then been resolved.

  326. Kernal Panicked by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

    The first thing I really remember on my first installation is that, while trying to get a server working, I chmodded something poorly, I think 777, which, besides the obvious security problems, sent my computer into a kernel panic next time it booted. If we're talking distros, I think it was a Red Hat version.

    Yup, n00b

  327. Slackware 2, 486DX/25, 450 MB hard drive. by SEE · · Score: 1

    Installed it to its own partition, used the OS/2 boot manager to start it. First thing I did with it, of course, was use vi to configure Xfree86.

  328. RedHat 5 from a SAMS book by stefancaunter · · Score: 1

    and beginning an obsessive hunt for compatible isa network cards so lynx could get to hotmail

  329. Back in 1994 by tugfoigel · · Score: 1

    I set up a web server and found my first customers. I designed their web sites, hosted them and realized that I preferred software engineering and the technical aspects to web design and hosting. I suppose that if I had had better resources I could've had a better time in the hosting parts.

    Oh yeah, it was Slackware all the way on a 486.

  330. somewhat lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was 1999, I was 12 years old, and someone online whom I had never met told me I would be cool if I used linux. I guess I wanted to be cool, so I got a copy of mandrake something point something from best buy.

    I didn't know what a partition was, but I guessed and it worked out okay.

    The first thing I did? I installed snes9x and played Super Mario World.

  331. Drunk guy at a party by quantaman · · Score: 1

    A few years back I was at a slightly geeky party.

    Me and a few friends were discussing different distros, debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc.

    At which point a fairly inebriated guy turned around and proclaimed in a loud voice.

    "I've been a Slackware user since 1996 and I'll be a Slackware user till the day I die!"

    I can't remember the rest of the night but I seem to recall some people complaining about a certain GCC patch.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  332. 1992 (or early 93?) by mkcmkc · · Score: 1

    I installed it on an old (even for then) POS 16MHz 386 PC we had sitting in a corner at work. Mostly I remember running 'find /' over and over again, marveling at how outrageously fast it was compared to the Sun Sparcstations (1+'s or 2's?) that we used for real work. Not an entirely fair comparison, since the Sun's used bitmapped graphics for everything, whereas Linux in console mode gets to use character-mode video hardware. Still, it was a revelation.

    A few years later, I was developing an early web site, and damned if that thing didn't run faster on underpowered Compaq Aero 486SX than it did on the Sun boxes we had there. At that point, Sun had just switched to "Slowlaris", and I really can't think of any Sun box since that I've seen match Linux for speed. They did/do still support larger, more enterprisey hardware, of course.

    --
    "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
  333. Slackware around 1995 I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first Linux attempt was with Slackware something on other, on a 486 DX2 66, 8 MB ram, and a huge 40 MB HDD (I think I had a Creative Soundblaster "gaming package" or something with a 2X CD-ROM drive). This was in 1995 I think. At that time I was running DOS with Windows 3.11 for Workgroups.

    I got a Slackware CD from a friend in my Polytechnic (Ngee Ann, in Singapore for those who care), and I nuked my Windows installation trying to get slack to run.

    I never did manage to get X running but it was great fun trying to edit and figure out various features. I had to use Windows for school work, so back I when.

    Since then, I have experimented with various distros such as Redhat (I think I bought the Redhat 5 box version), Debian, Gentoo, and others.

    Currently my PC runs Windows mostly, whereas my laptop is usually running Ubuntu.

  334. First Use Of Linux by misterduffy · · Score: 1

    Let's see. OS X Server 1.2 won't count because that was NeXT-based which itself was UNIX-based so it would have to be some distro of Yellowdog I installed on a pre-OS X G4 PowerMac. After that it was Xebian on an XBox. I've got a thing about making technology do things its not meant to to, so installing Linux on a PC seemed a bit pointless...

  335. Broke Windows, of course by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 1

    To experiment the first thing I decided to do was to install Ubuntu (Hardy at the time) on a 4GB flash drive. For the most part this went well, but for one thing: this being my first try with Linux, I skipped the "Advanced" button on the review step of the install. Turns out that's where you tell the installer where to put grub, and that it defaults to hd0 even if installing to a flash drive.

    This resulted in my hard drive having GRUB on the MBR, but /boot being (correctly) on the flash drive. Of couse, with only half of GRUB on each, neither would boot. After some time, it finally occurred to me to run fixmbr off the Windows XP disc (it was late, I was tired), and with my system working I later got Ubuntu correctly installed to the flash drive after asking a friend who knew about that option to choose where to put GRUB.

    BTW, it worked well off the USB, except FireFox, which ran like tar and locked up a lot (multiple times loading a single page in many cases). Opera worked well though, and I was even able to rig it up to install the correct graphics card driver prior to loading X, since I ran it from multiple PCs for a while. Since swap on a flash drive is a bad idea, I put a 2GB swap on the HDD of a low-end PC I used it on, and on the ones with good RAM simply used no swap at all.

  336. ./configure; make; make install; ??? by JorgeFierro · · Score: 1

    I first installed ubuntu on my computer in 2006, everything was easy. Learned the basic stuff, how to use the shell.

  337. Recompile My Kernel by n3v · · Score: 1

    For like a day....

    Go Slackware!

  338. My First Linux hmm by R.Morton · · Score: 1

    Just logged in to /. for the first time, I have been reading this Site since 2000. But to the question at hand when I first tried Linux it was Debian "Woody" after reading some articles on the net about Linux. It lead me to Distrowatch.org which made me go "whoa" as I looked around and read the many reviews, viewed the numerous sites that each had their own version of the Linux Kernel (they seem to always make their own custom kernels) and a never ending array of Custom config tools and such. I finally decided on a version calling itself "Ice pack Linux 1.75". being on a Dial up connection, I placed an order for This linux distro with my debit card and 3 weeks later I got a package in the mail of 8 CD's all bearing the Debian Logo needless to say I was pissed off at first, then I thought well mistakes are easy to make in a large company knowing that a lot of companies distribute a lot of different brands of similar Items. So I sent them an Email stating what the problem was and how to go about making an Exchange for the "Correct Version of Linux" that I had Ordered and they sent me an Email telling me that I had the correct version that I ordered and that "Ice Pack 1.75" was nothing more than a Re-named version of Debian Woody. so after reading some posts on LinuxQuestions.org about people with similar hardware to mine, I found for the most part my Computer was supported all the way Except for the Modem that is (that when I learned a new terms Winmodem and softmodem) so I went out and bought a US Robotics 56 K external Hardware modem that plugged in to com port2 on my ancient P2 - 300 MHZ with 256 megs of ram and a 2GB hdd and a creative labs CDrom/sound card setup. So the first thing I had to do was boot the computer from the CDrom no easy task even in the bios after finding it and enabling boot from cd option it would not boot the damn machine at all so after a week of trying to figure it out I gave up for a while and decided to give a rest and try again later on in the week. while hanging out a freinds house and helping him upgrade his computers CDrom Drive to a brand new CDROM Burner drive he got a best buy for $149.99. he asked me if i would like his old 24x cdrom and i said "sure, maybe it would work for installing Linux on my machine" and he looked at me said "Linux ?" and i started telling him all about it and he said "well it is just a flash in the pan like OS/2, it will never last long enough to worry about don't waste your time with it dude." That's when I looked at him and said "well I would at least like to try it out". so with that I took the cdrom drive he gave me and headed home. when I got home that night I installed the new drive and got rid of the creative labs drive put the cover back on my PC and turned it on and booted in to windows 98se and Placed the Debian disc #1 in the drive and reboot windows after what seemed like forever the cdrom drive started flikering like mad and there was was a black screen filled with white writing wizzing by pretty quick and then a blue screen and grey screen with welcome screen and ton of lang options. well needless to say it was a breeze to install until I got to the X Server setup part there were all kinds of options and tried each one till i got one that worked for me. then i had to use a tool called vim to edit a file that X used for Configuring the itself to my video card a TNT Riva 128 and change the resolution from 640 x 480 to 1024 x 768. but after all that it just worked it was like the greatest thing I had ever seen it was fresh and exciting, my first Installation change was KDE and I spent days going through all of its options (which there seemed no end to) but I did not mind that as it was cool to play with. I decided to invite my buddy over to look at my Computer and let him see a working installation for himslef thinking he would change his mind about it. Well he came over looked it over and I showed him all the stuff I had discovered and could do with it. he just sat there and said "where are the games at ?." and for a

    --
    modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
    1. Re:My First Linux hmm by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      tl; dr.

      You know how unreadable that wall of text is? We have these cool things called paragraphs.

      --
    2. Re:My First Linux hmm by R.Morton · · Score: 1

      yeah I know but /. seems to alter any form formating when it I previewed it, all was fine then it went to hell after I hit submit.

      --
      modded quote "what's that he's talking about? Windows , Never had a problem with Windows till I tried to use it."
    3. Re:My First Linux hmm by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      That's because you probably have, by default, set the text mode to "HTML formatted". You need to use html tags for that mode. If you dont, it squishes it into 'tl; dr' mode.

      If you use "Plan Old Text", it then appears as proper line breaks.

      Like. This.

      If you use "Extrans", then it will print <html><tags><like><this><as><text>.

      --
  339. "I Learned" by m6ack · · Score: 1
    My first expedition into Linux was in my quest to install it on my Chinese wife's PC... Hers was running a Chinese version of Windows 98... and I couldn't administer it. At the same time, at work I was using Solaris and Windows... and I wanted my own Unix Box. My hope was that one day I would be able to boot into Linux and administer the system in my language, and let her have her own language in her login. But in the process I wanted to /learn/ -- and I did.

    In the end, I got her a Mac Mini -- still Unix and safer & easier to manage for me than Windows... And I got my Linux install on my work Laptop, that I use almost exclusively. And as a result of learning, I was able to do some really creative work at my job, & the work I did with that knowledge got me a promo.

  340. Slackware from 50 diskettes in about 1994 by shoor · · Score: 1

    I was a programmer working mostly in Unix and embedded systems. I'd actually quit for 3 years trying to write science fiction but my money ran out and I had to go back to work as a programmer at the end of 1993. My home computer was an Atari 520ST purchased in the late 1980s which I still have, tucked away in a closet. I'd used CP/M back in the 1970s and early 80s, but had very little experience with MS-DOS or any other Microsoft product. I remember not buying that original IBM PC or Apple II because they seemed so overpriced for their underpowered CPU chips.

    Anyway, once I had a programming job again, and started to catch up on the changes in the world of computers while I'd been away, the point came where I purchased a laptop with Windows 3.1 installed. Coming from the Unix world I found it very awkward and strange. A colleague at work showed me an ad for linux, which was supposed to be unix-like. I called the place up and ordered it. When it arrived I reserved a Saturday morning to install it on my precious laptop with its 250MB hard drive. The distro was slackware 2.0. It came on 50 diskettes which I still have.

    It was a pretty scary experience. At one point the windows system was gone, and linux hadn't been installed properly and I wondered if I'd just trashed my whole laptop. But I went back and booted the install diskette from the linux distro and went through the process all over and finally it was working, and I was happy to have my familiar programs like vi up and running on the laptop.

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice they're different. (Yogi Berra & A. Einstein)
  341. Class work by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    It was 1993, and I installed Slackware Linux 1.03 (Linux kernel 0.99 pl11, I think) on my '386 PC. I was still a physics student then, and was starting to do more with computational lab analysis in FORTRAN77 (random sampling of data, R-K simulation, etc.) I used to make frequent trips to the UNIX labs to do my analysis there, which was actually better than using the (shared) systems via the campus dialup.

    Before moving to Linux, my primary platform was MS-DOS. I used WordPerfect 5.1 to write term papers and lab write-ups, and As-Easy-as 5 (a shareware Lotus 1-2-3 clone) to do my spreadsheet-driven data analysis (linear fit, std dev, etc.)

    Moving to Linux certainly made my lab analysis easier (using 'f77') since I could now do it all from my dorm room with no trips to the labs. I could run X Windows (using 'twm') same as the labs. I had already tinkered with LaTeX before then, so it was easy to switch to that to write the rest of my college papers. I don't remember what I used as my spreadsheet under Linux, but I know I had one. And I had a terminal emulator (looked a lot like ProComm) so I could dial into the main computer lab if I needed to use Mathematica.

    Later, DOSEmu let me run MS-DOS under Linux, so I eventually moved back to As-Easy-As until I graduated in 1995.

    I remember that the success of Linux, even then, encouraged me that we could get a free version of DOS off the ground in 1994, when Microsoft hinted that DOS would "die" in 1995. :-)

  342. My first experience by McBeer · · Score: 1

    Tried to install it, found out a lot of my hardware was unsupported, couldn't figure out how to install needed drivers, gave up, watched TV. Not exactly a great success story in my case :(

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  343. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bootstrap it. That's the first thing I did. I started with GNU/Linux rather early in the game with yggdrasil linux in '93 (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yggdrasil_Linux). The first thing necessary to use it was to bootstrap it. That was an exercise in patience to say the least.

    Many of you young'ns with your yum -y install this and aptitude -y install that and your Gentoo this and emerge that, don't know how difficult it is to actually *build* a GNU/Linux distribution.

    The documentation from the LFS group is a thousand fold better than the documentation back then! So there! Take that!

  344. In 1999, by warrior_s · · Score: 1

    I had to buy a Red Hat book to get my hands on to the linux install CD that came with it. It took me (and one of my other friends) a whole night to figure out how to partition the drive. Basically, it was something like if you install linux in the partition beyond 4 or 8 GB (dont remember exactly), then you can not boot linux from that partition. We had windows installed in the beginning of HD. It took us a while to get it running, but it was fun.

    There was no internet in our dorms at that time. All the computers on our floor were connected using the old coax cable with terminators at both the ends.

  345. A Series of firsts.... by Count+Fenring · · Score: 1

    My first experience with Linux was with circa-1995-6 versions of Red Hat and Suse. Red Hat lasted merely minutes, due to my inability to get sound or internet working at all. Suse lasted a few days, sound but not internet and then I decided that it was fascinating, but not worth it.

    My first extended experience with Linux was also Suse, in 2002. I got a professor to let me teach myself how to use Linux for an independent study project; this time I got everything working except for printing (printers, amirite? Seriously, I looked it up later, and the problem was that the HP model I had wasn't supported through cups until a year and a half after the ISP was over ;-). Then I went back to Windows.

    Then, in the middle of my thesis, I essentially went mad and decided that the best thing to do in the middle of my thesis was to switch operating systems. Originally I ran a Knoppix hard drive install, and have since poked at various Debian-based distros (Debian, Mepis, and (X|K)ubuntu, sticking on Kubuntu.)

  346. Anyone remember the old Caldera installer? by msimm · · Score: 1

    Before they became the Microsoft/SCO turd? The installer let you play Tetris while you waited...so the first thing I did was was literally a little gaming. ;-)

    --
    Quack, quack.
  347. Slackware. by Greyor · · Score: 1

    This is basically my only Linux story until I installed Ubuntu in 2007 (try #2). I installed Slackware in 1996 or so after painstakingly downloading and copying it onto at least ten floppies, and all was well for awhile.

    Until I tried to repartition my drive and failed miserably at it, nuking my DOS partition. As this was the family computer, my parents were none too happy. My dad complained for a long time afterwards about LILO coming up at boot when Linux was no longer there, and I don't remember how I eventually fixed it, but yeah...

    Thus it took me about ten years to get back to Linux again after that disaster, but I have Ubuntu now and haven't looked back to XP after I replaced it.

  348. Saw Fedora, installed Ubuntu by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Back in my senior year of high school (3 years ago), I was doing an intro to Python via independent study; my advisor's office had a Fedora machine in it.

    I had kinda been willing to try Linux; the catalyst for actually doing so came with my underpowered Vista laptop. (I figured installing Linux would be a good way to fix that.)

    So I gave the guy an email, and he suggested wubi. (As straightforward as any other Windows-app install, and it uses Ubuntu, certainly more newbie-friendly than some other distros)

    I loved it. The laptop started running a LOT faster, it it was fine for what I was doing - I was [and still am] using that laptop mainly during class - take notes, relieve some stress/kill some time by surfing or playing gnome-games. [My home computer, an XP desktop, is still working quite okay, so I've been sticking with that as my main machine.]

    I got around to doing a real/full OS install when it came time to upgrade to Ubuntu 8.10, and I'll do something similar when I get around to upgrading to Ubuntu 9.04
    Yay for legal uses of BitTorrent (fetching the ISO)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  349. 1st thing i did with my 1st linux box by Device666 · · Score: 1

    It was in 1999 I first installed linux (i believe it was redhat). After several failed attempts to immediately get all the hardware running during install, I chose to do a bare install. So when the distro was on my box I tried to compile the kernel, drawing my install useless. After many attempts (and many weeks later) I got it right and used it to do fun stuff with bash. I browsed with lynx (I sometimes still like to do). The first useful thing I did was learn programming C on linux. And I still think linux is the greates power user / developer OS.

  350. Back in '96 ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... when I worked for Boeing, engineering was (still is) done on *NIX workstations. Office applications at the time were available on Apple Macs. Microsoft was actively trying to get something onto our desktops, but the Windows of that era was a complete joke (still is). My primary working desktops at that time were a Sun and occasionally an HP (shared by our group).

    One day, the PC guys started dropping off Dells, equipped only with DOS. The desktop support people would be along Real Soon Now to install Windows. In the meantime, the damned thing just sat there (and for most people would for another year or so as they couldn't actually get Windows to run). Meanwhile, the Linux kernel had hit 1.2.13 and was available with X/Motif. We had an approved install image on an engineering server, so I got the OK from management to try it out. I never looked back. When the PC guys came around with their Windows floppies, I just told them 'Don't bother'. I could run anything I needed from my X desktop hosted not only on the local workstations, but on remote systems. Additionally, many of our engineering apps were available as source and it was pretty easy (with the occasional Makefile patch) to get them running on Linux.

    I recall one instance where I had to parse a bunch engineering documents (hosted on NT servers) with a natural language recognition app and populate a knowledge base on a (remote) Oracle db. In keeping with my philosophy of getting computers to do all my work, I wrote a simple Perl app to fetch each document (using Samba), parse it locally and insert the results using an Oracle::DBD driver. So I started the script and kept one eye on the console output while screwing around, surfing the web. About 20 minutes into the process, one of the NT admins came running down the hall, yelling at me to stop whatever I was doing. Evidently, I was fetching documents faster then the poor little NT server could handle. And my stupid little Dell was running the NL parser and Oracle client without breaking a sweat.

    I continued to be exempt from having a Windows system forced upon me. It was actually possible to run a full Windows desktop, hosted on a remote NT system, on X, which is what I'd do whenever one of the PHBs complained that we all simply HAD to have access to one. It was interesting to note how infrequently it was needed. This continued until Boeing pushed most of their engineering out to subcontractors and foreign subsidiaries around 2004 when I left.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  351. hacked ping, to make it work. by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    All you puppies... you actually saw Linux *running* before you tried to use it. So cute!

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  352. 92 or 93 by tempest69 · · Score: 1
    My friend was showing it off to me. Explaining the whole multitasking thing, while I was wholly unimpessed. We fired up some IRC and I was impressed again.. it wasnt laggy. (sure it was on a good ethernet line at the time.. and the os didnt matter.. what did I know) Then I played with Vi .. and command mode scarred me pretty bad.. I had to walk away from such a godforsaken method of editing. Clearly wordperfect was the ultimate, never to be truly superceded. Then I was shown a jpeg... for the first time.. but the hardware and the algorithms were slow. so I waited about 3 minutes for it to "render" this wasnt in X.. it was like cshow for dos.. it changed into graphics mode.

    Storm

  353. geekgasm by tibman · · Score: 1

    I started with RedHat 6.2 (late 90's) on my first homebuilt box (AMD k6-2 400mhz and 3dFX voodoo 3000). The winmodem i had didn't work so i dug out an old external 28.8kbps modem that stayed connected 24/7 on our second phone line. So cool. I downloaded everything needed for Enlightenment.. took a week. I kept the checklist in my pocket at ALL times and checked on it at school (through telnet, it was like magic).

    The first time Enlightenment came up i had a geekgasm. Just knew that i was a linux geek for life. RPM hell drove me to Gentoo and i've been there ever since.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  354. sparc version by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Red Hat 5 on a Sparc 1+. Worked fairly well. It was only a curiosity and I gave away the machine soon after.

    Second experience: Red Hat 7 on a Compaq notebook. It was tricky to set up (especially the sound drivers and supporting the native 1024X600 screen) but it ran faster than XP and did what I needed to do. This was soon followed by Red Hat 7 on an old Celeron box, which hosted the family website. The website still exists, and has been hosted on successive versions of Red Hat (currently Fedora 10) ever since.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  355. Kernel version 0.11, January1992 by uassholes · · Score: 1

    Two floppies: one to boot, one for the root fs. What apps? I just wanted anything but windoz.

  356. It started nine years ago... by Bootarn · · Score: 1

    When I was twelve I decided to try GNU/Linux. I was running Windows 98 at that time, and I didn't like it when it corrupted my partitions. Quite naturally I chose a distro which could be installed on top of a FAT file system, and I opted for Dragon Linux, which was slackware based. It was quite a mess. I never actually got X running with it, but I got doom running, though (albeit without sound).

  357. RAWRITE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Back in 1992 when I first started off with Linux, you downloaded two floppy images" - by thomasdz (178114) on Saturday April 25, @08:32AM (#27711553)

    Yes... the "RAWRITE" startup disks! I had the same experience using Slackware 1.01 iirc, & around the same timeframe.

    I obtained the Slackware distro from a local "computer fair" we have periodically @ the local NYState Fairgrounds (the city I live in on/off hosts that event also), & I nabbed it because I wanted to have a "PC UNIX" basically, & it was VERY cheap (4 CD distro too).

    I was a WEE bit 'disappointed' when my Diamond Stealth 24 ISA board wasn't supported in "X" though, & I was 'stuck' doing tty work (still, overall it was a good experience that got me into the *NIX commandline more, so much so, that to this day I still haul in *NIX commands/programs ported to Win32 (my favorite)).

    APK

    P.S.=> The next time I used Linux @ home was Redhat (or, was it Mandrake?), & I liked it well enough... iirc, it did finally support the vidcard I had @ the time this time (NVidia user here almost exclusively, because I like OpenGL based gaming & coding too @ times), & KDE 2.2 iirc, was the desktop shell (I liked it), circa 2000/2001 iirc...

    HOWEVER: I'm still more of a "Windows user" here mostly, because it is what most of the softwares I use run on (coding doesn't matter to me either way, the compilers I use in C/C++ &/or Delphi/Kylix are from Borland & run on both platforms (Linux &/or Windows))... apk

  358. horrible by bami · · Score: 1

    PII 350 mhz, SuSE Linux, installer a really bad mix of English and German, shitloads of options and a badly written "dummy's guide into linux".

    Got it installed, but really just fubar. Never looked back into Linux until 2 years ago, when my Windows install crashed beyond repair and I needed some files from my harddrive. Don't know why, but among my dad's "Windows Rescue CD's" was a copy of Debian live-CD. Booted that up, and was able to recover my files. Never got a real linux setup till a few months back, since I never could either Ubuntu or Debian to work on my Radeon 9800. It always crashed booting.

    My distro of choice is EEEbuntu (with the cool blue theme, instead of the manure themed vanilla Ubuntu), and works pretty nicely. Also found myself using windows-r (run box) a lot more since everytime something is broken in Ubuntu (and that happens a lot to me), it's usually fixed by dumping commands into the terminal.

    My only grudge with linux are the poor UI's of some of it's programs. I would never trade in photoshop with GIMP, Blender is shortcut hell and some things are not so intuitive, for example, double click on something in windows to select only the connected regular a-zA-Z0-9, triple click to select all the contents of the textbox. I use that to for example select a word out of a url, or select a whole word quickly in a word processor, while this feature is missing from most distro's I've used. Anybody found this anywhere else?

  359. my first router/gateway by TimFenn · · Score: 1

    When I moved in with some friends that wanted to split an internet connection back in '99, there weren't too many all-in-one routers, and those that did exist were either expensive or sucked. One of my roomies and I figured "hey, we can make our own router using linux!" So we dug through a trash bin near the CS building, found an old 386 with a dead disk controller and patched it up and added 2 ethernet cards. With a few bucks we bought a cheap 8 port hub and installed redhat 6.0 (it had just been released, and it was all that was cool in those days). We had done some internet research beforehand to learn ipchains enough to set up forwarding, and away we went. It worked so well we eventually started using the linux box as a common fileserver, name server, print server, web server, etc.

    I've been a RH/fedora user ever since.

    --
    CAPS LOCK IS THE CRUISE CONTROL OF AWESOMNESS
  360. Easy... by jaimegarcia · · Score: 0

    Reboot back to Windows.

  361. Real multi-user by Quenyar · · Score: 1

    We got Linux (Caldera 1.0) for our home because I have children and I didn't want endless squabbles about "he did this to my stuff" With Linux, each person had their own stuff and none could trespass on the others. They could also not accidentally invade my work files. It has worked great for us for all these years. True, we have some windows computers, but they're game boxes, period. It's also really nice not to be a full-time admin in your own home. Linux essentially runs itself, compared to Windows.

  362. My first Linux install by Eil · · Score: 1

    1996. Slackware 3.0. Kernel 1.2.13. A whole stack of effin' floppies. Installed on a Pentium 100MHz with 12MB of RAM.

    I was just getting the hang of this Internet thing when I ran across Slashdot and other sites talking about this Linux software. Windows was both frustrating and a bit boring, so I decide to check it out. I spend a good month just researching and reading docs before finally attempting the install. And then it took about another few weeks to get a working install. It was an odd feeling, booting an OS on my computer for the first time that wasn't MS-DOS or Windows.

    I clearly remember logging in as root, getting a shell prompt, and then saying to myself, "Okay, now what?"

    The biggest challenges were getting X and dialup PPP working. Back then, there was nothing in the way of hand-holding when it came to configuring something. You basically had to open up a text editor, write your config file, pray that it worked, debug when it didn't, etc. There were a few HOWTOs and docs online, but most of them were written by Unix/Linux experts who assumed you were as experienced as them. There was no googling for an error message and getting your solution on the first hit. If you didn't understand how something worked, you had little chance of getting it to work the way you wanted. Nowadays you just pop in an Ubuntu CD and a few clicks later, you have a fully-functional system and answers to most any question right at your fingertips.

    It's been a fun ride, actually.

  363. SNES Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in high school I learned that an SNES Emulator existed (only for Linux at the time.) So I excitedly went down and bought one of those big ass howto books with a Linux CD. An hour later me and two of my friends jump in excitement when we saw the opening sequence of FF6. My P75 at the time wasn't even fast enough to display the frames and music properly but goddamn was that awesome.

  364. Smoothwall by Duvzo · · Score: 1

    Firewalled and NATed an ISDN connection with no fuss. Piece of cake

  365. Red Hat 5.0 by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

    Early in 1998 I bought Red Hat 5.0 at Best Buy ($49.95)a couple of weeks after I bought my first computer. It had emacs, Tex/LaTex, C/C++ (I really wanted Tex/LaTeX, and I couldn't get a Windows version). I had used Unix earlier (twm circa 1995, anyone?). I had trouble with X (apparently Xresources was in the wrong directory), which I wanted for xdvi, so I bought Sam's Red Hat Unleashed. I bought a Hayes external modem (still have it) to get on the internet. The first sound I played was a Mission Impossible CD. And all the kernel tuning, who could forget?

  366. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My 386 had a CDROM. You were probably just new to computers and didnt know what you were doing at the time. How did you not have the manual to your motherboard? A simple BIOS update would have fixed that for you.

  367. I tried SAMBA - and never used Linux again by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

    More than 10 years ago I installed Linux on a tower, got some thing setup, and then tried running SaMBA so I could get to all my files on Windows. After a weekend of working on it with 2 "Getting Started with Linux" books it wouldn't work and there were no diagnostic tools to figure out at what level it failed. So Linux was worthless to me.

    My title is misleading since as long as people are paying me to use Linux, I've used it. Ubuntu makes it fairly reasonable as a stand-alone server, but drivers, FS, and other compatibility problems mean it is worthless as an everyday OS for me.

    If I'm going to use an alternate OS, I prefer something fun and useful like BeOS!

    8-PP

  368. Lucky me, disk crashed by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

    1998: Had Windows Millennium and the hard disk crashed. Got another disk, installed Slackware (first time in my life to touch Linux -- printed the installation instructions).

    2 days later, I installed and configured Apache, Mysql & PHP.

    Ditched Windows after 6 or 8 months.

    I have normal blood pressure now.

    --
    Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
  369. First time Linux Install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first time I installed Slackware or SLS Linux was in 1993 on a 486DX266. I was developing an X interface using motif for a neural network toolbox that my employer had developed. I used slackware in a follow on project a couple of years later for decoding a telemetry stream from a small jet-powered UAV and then multicasted the data out to other computers that displayed virtual instrumentation that could be monitored during the flight.

  370. a four floppy 0.9x version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot remember exactly which release, but I was about to embark on a SCADA project on a Sun box running Solaris and I was entirely ignorant of unix. So I downloaded a four floppy disk set which installed a linux filesystem into the DOS structure on my 486DX2 running a whole 50MHz.

    The infection has been with me ever since.

  371. telenut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tried packet injection to crack wep :p
    I'm not the only one, I'm sure...

  372. Frozen Bubble by winphreak · · Score: 1

    Frozen Bubble was the first thing I played after installing Mandrake 9.2.

    And honestly, for the longest while, accounted for half of my time on my linux partition.

    Good times.

    --
    "I'm a well-wisher, in that I don't wish you any specific harm."
  373. Gcc ... by bettlebrox · · Score: 1

    Red Hat 5.2, sometime around 1999, I installed it so I could compile my homework, for a C programming class, instead of having to use hyperterminal to connect to school, from which I then had to telnet to the CS dept's Solaris system. Later moved to Debian and never looked back, and now using Debian & Ubuntu on different computers. Wow, 10 years using Linux! :)

    --

    I have a very small mind and must live with it.
    -- E. Dijkstra

  374. The Auditor by Innovative1 · · Score: 1

    My first experience with an actual distro was The Auditor Collection...long before Backtrack. Backtrack is amazing though now. So much more developed.

  375. The same thing we did every night... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

    I got some Slackware dist in summer 1996 (probably 3.0). I had a modem connection to the Internet, and Linux came from InfoMagic's 6 CD sets. (The 6 CDs included Slackware, Red Hat and Debian, and still enough space for Sunsite archive and tons more! I hear you may need a few more CDs if you want to put the same material in the same package these days.)

    Basically, I had heard of Linux a long time before, and what I wanted to do at the time was to run the same free software that I was starting to enjoy on Win95 and MS-DOS: Emacs, GCC (I was learning C and was using DJGPP) and TeX.

    I had some rudimentary Unix knowledge from some book I got from the library (I can't remember much, but it was probably about some commercial Unix brands) so it wasn't really all that painful.

    1. Re:The same thing we did every night... by cheesybagel · · Score: 1
      Same here. I got the InfoMagic 6 CD set from April 1996 and installed Slackware 3.0. You had to make a boot floppy because autoboot CDs didn't exist back then. I remember using X11 with FVWM to basically run mostly XTerms.

      I got it because I wanted to do C and UNIX C programming at home, without having to use Solaris at the University.

  376. I filled the students server's temporary volume by Ernesto+Alvarez · · Score: 1

    Literally.

    I was downloading Slackware on 1998 and had no broadband yet, so I used the university's sun server to download the 50 diskettes needed to install it with all bells and whistles. I left it downloading and went home, when I came back the next day I had filled the whole /tmp volume with the download.

    (not that it did stop me, I just limited the amount of data to download at one time and kept firing the downloader)

    And, yes. That was all the space they had for students at that time.

  377. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was an accountant who was drafted to become a Xenix sysadmin in the mid 90s. Didn't know squat about it but they showed me the server and said "you're responsible for this" so I taught myself enough not to completely screw it up.

    Loaded Caldera OpenLinux on my home PC somewhere around 1998, and it mostly sucked, but I have run a dual boot setup ever since. Over the years moved to TurboLinux, then Redhat, then Ubuntu. Not sure why I have preferred to use Linux all these years, because it's only recently that it isn't just a pain in the neck a lot of the time. It must be a form of self loathing to have spent all those nights trying to make stuff work in Linux that already worked just fine in Windows.

  378. I installed the Japanese version of Redhat 4 by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

    After a friend convinced me to try it out. Needless to say, after the installation (which remained in English) I was absolutely baffled.

    (there were 3 installation images, a .iso and a -ja.iso. I assumed it was a newer version and ...)

    By the end of that year I had 2 kernel patches in though.

  379. I don't mind saying it by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    What Did You Do First With Linux?

    dir[enter]

  380. slackware by WML+MUNSON · · Score: 1

    for one reason or another i tried slackware first about five years ago. it took about a week to get to where i learned that startx was the way into the gui and another two weeks before i got it to actually load the gui without erroring out.

    i eventually got the network link up and managed to configure my machine so well that if i moved the mouse the wrong way my browser window would simply disappear.

    i've since become a debian loyalist, but i feel like i got it right by starting with a really hardcore system first. it really helped me learn linux properly and made using any other flavor after that a snap.

  381. my first Linux installation by belmolis · · Score: 1

    I first installed Linux on my laptop in the Spring of 1995. The distribution was Slackware, on 32 floppies as I recall. I had been using Unix since 1982, so for me this was not an introduction to Unix but rather, to my great relief, the ability to use Unix on my personal computers.

  382. First experience with Linux by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

    In 1999 I was introduced to Linux. I got a copy of Caldera 2.2 and bought a new machine to try it on. There was a fair amount of pain to get Apache and Tomcat up and running, but after a couple of weeks I had a working system.

    I had to leave it alone for three months after that, and figured that it would crash after a few days, a week at most. So I come back to it, and its running fine. Suddenly my thinking changes. Previously I thought it was the computers themselves that were unreliable. Turns out it was the OS - Windows - all along.

    In 2002 my primary machine - a Windows box - got a virus. I had to decide whether I would reinstall Windows or make the move to Linux on the Desktop. I installed Red Hat 7.2 I believe, and never regretted it. I still use Windows for a few tasks though - video editing.

  383. first time was terrible! by district · · Score: 1

    I thought linux was going to be something I tried that one time back in college. Now its a lifestyle. I installed mandrake in college (ca. 2002), and tried dual-booting for a while. Being a literature major, I was not able to make heads or tails of it, although I was able to play supertux a few times. I installed Ubuntu about 1.5 yrs ago, and removed windows about 2 months later. Its not just that I never coded, or couldn't edit a config file (both true: don't have time to get that involved). Its more that Ubuntu lets me learn things gradually. I went from saying "I don't care how easy you say it is; I'll find a gui way to doing it" to being a reasonably capable user. Mandatory xkcd: http://xkcd.com/456/

  384. Decided I Hated dpkg by jaminJay · · Score: 1

    Decided that I hated dpkg.

    --
    Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  385. Audio CDs hung Windows 95 by aszaidi · · Score: 2, Informative

    but my freshly installed Slackware played them without any trouble. It was what got me started on switching everything over to Linux and that's where I've been for the last few years.

    1. Re:Audio CDs hung Windows 95 by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Yep - device drivers - the killer app for Linux since 1991.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  386. Started with Red Hat by jdvogt · · Score: 1

    Probably 1994, I was maybe 9 or 10, I don't have any idea where I got the Redhat install disks (CD?). Nope, had to be disks because all my friend and I had was an old computer which was surely a 286 or 386.

    We had a book. Once we finally got it installed we had no idea what to do with it. Ended up messing around with some commands and that was it.

    It probably wasn't until a year or two later that I had a distro that fit on a 3.5 floppy that I used as a router to share our 56k modem throughout our house that I actually USED linux. Still didn't know how it worked.

    It was probably 3 more hobby installs over the years before I ever had a semi-permanent use for Linux.

    Now I use it every day. I run a cluster of ubuntu servers on EC2 and a custom FC6 server running a tuned version of asterisk capable of a lot of simultaneous outgoing calls.

    This is the back end of my company, Talk Life, which offers on-demand phone access to counselors and therapists for those times when you just need to talk.

  387. My first Linux experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have a computer in my bedroom, about six years ago. It ran Caldera OpenLinux 2.4 with KDE 2.0 while it had Linux. I can remember making a link and thinking that it would magically become an application at one point. At another, I remember trying to get Flash to work and giving up when Bonus.com hung the machine.

    I was eight.

  388. Trouble with X11: not as good as AJAX by LeDopore · · Score: 1

    Replying to your question about what's wrong with X11, I can say that one thing that puzzles me is how a protocol designed form the ground up to allow you to open windows transparently over a network connection can be *so* *much* *slower* than AJAX, which is an unholy (but impressive) melange of techs never designed to do remote apps.

    I know that X11 does a lot more than AJAX, but still, couldn't anyone figure out how to split up the client/server workload so that I don't get a multi-second delay rendering every drop-down menu when I work across my 600+ kb/s connection?

    --
    Expected time to finish is 1 hour and 60 minutes.
  389. Was my first very own OS... by timscully · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Computer stuff...I couldn't afford Windows at age 14-16 so I used what was available

  390. First time using it remotely and my own boxes... by antdude · · Score: 1

    It was in a college/university computer lab (not CS') with an old /. member from our college days. He showed me Linux (Red Hat? Slackware?) and telnet (no SSH yet). I fell in love with the text mode programs like Tin (still use it and test some builds for Urs, the maintainer). I also used Pine, SLiRP, TIA, FTP, etc. on a production machine for school's e-mail services on 14.4k - 56k (only up to 28.8k) dial-up (useful for text modes!).

    I did not run Linux on my own computers until 486 DX2/66. Then, I got stuck with the Red Hat Linux v6.1(?)'s Disk Druid because I didn't know about disk partitioning and stuff. I was scared too. Finally, I got through it with a dual boot setup. Then, I didn't do much. Got bored and frustrated. Then, came v7.1(?) and loved it. Had an extra box for it to be run it for 227 days of uptime because no more Kernel updates and stuff. Then, came Debian which was even better and still use it today.

    I noticed I like all computers and OS': Apple and its Mac OS X, PC with Windows, DOS, and Linux.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  391. Slackware in 1993 by rediguana · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow - brings back memories ;) I think it was 1993 at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. A stage 2 computer science source said we could use the lab for programming, or we could install this thing called Slackware Linux that had gcc and everything we needed for out projects. So, of course I did. Mmmm, floppy installs. So, it was mainly used early on for COSC assignments. A few years later setup Red Hat as a DNS and webserver in 1996 for our fledgling web development company. In later years after I stepped out of the IT field continued to use it for servers in our small business, although starting to fix it up with OS X as well. Never used it as a desktop - have primarily been Windows, and over the last nearly 5 years OS X (which seems to be a fantastic compromise).

    But yeah, the first thing was COSC programming assignments in '93.

  392. I did what I still do with linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slackware 2.? I think? I did what I still do, Install, explore, attempt to install new apps, fail to get it right, erase the HD, install mainstream OS. Linux is getting better, but not for me. It's not as if I don't try, I would istall a new distro about every 6 months, love Ubuntu, it's going down the right path, paying for RedHat is OK, but not if you already have an OS.

  393. Formatted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And installed XP. An SSD with an OS I can do stuff on. Woot.

  394. AJAX is the opposite of X11 by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

    You ask "Why the fuck is X11 so damn slow?" I answer "Producers of modern X11 toolkits don't design with low-bandwidth connections in mind." Try running something like xpdf over your 600kb/s connection. :)

    Anyway, on to the X11 vs. AJAX question:
    My understanding of the deep internals of X11 is a little fuzzy, so what I'm going to say here is not completely correct. Please correct me when I fuck something up.

    With AJAX, you have a remote server that pushes all of the UI and the instructions to render it to the client. The client handles the rendering. (This is why some AJAX apps are completely fucked up on some browsers and not others.)

    With X11, you have a remote server that pushes the state of a remote app to the client. The server handles all of the rendering. (This is why -assuming that your app doesn't require some X11 extension that you don't have-, remote X11 apps look the same, no matter what local X "server" you're using.)

    Now, we could do a *much* better job of offloading a lot of work to the client. This would allow us to write X11 apps that would survive being connected to a new "server". Ask google about this:

    aKademy06-KDE_and_Consumer_Electronics_-_The_Lost_Momentum_-_Holger_Freyther

    for an example of (IIRC) a GTK app which was written to survive connection to a new X "server".

    1. Re:AJAX is the opposite of X11 by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Oh balls. I mis-remembered. He only mentions that he's made a "teleportable" application. He never gets time to demo it. I hope that you didn't sit through that whole video. :(

  395. What Did You Do First With Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curse. Later, I managed to use it and even like it.

  396. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My first linux was Slackware 2.1.0 dated 1994 onto a 4 meg. 386sx with a flaky keyboard and flaky 1.2meg Floppy drive and no cdrom. The files came from a cdrom that came with massively overpriced book mostly consisting of the freely available documentation cut and pasted onto its pages. It took all day to install because my keyboard would often register 2 returns for a single key press. As a result I ended up making choices i didn't want and would have to start all over again. This was kernel 1.1.59. X was impossible on this machine.

  397. Went "wow looks different"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then because none of the apps I used were available in Linux, re-installed Windows. Nowadays if I did the same, I'd run Firefox and Thunderbird a bit, then re-install Windows for the same reason as before.

  398. Linux as DNS server by CaptainAx · · Score: 1

    I had a 5 meg 386DX-40 that I ran as a DNS server for ham radio. I loaded the entire net-44 into it. It responded nicely. 150ms average. Back then there was only SLS and Slackware and I got Slackware from a buddy on floppies.

  399. After my first install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I re-installed, because it was barely functional, from me screwing most of it up in the first attempt.
    On the bright side, it's still running today...

  400. AI programming class at UNI by whyde · · Score: 1

    Slackware Linux, pre-1.0 kernel, roughly 1992 (my memory is hazy)... I was using it to run Common LISP much more effectively than the unfortunate ones who were using the class-provided DOS-based version of LISP with horrible memory management limitations.

    This let me solve larger problems in a much more friendly development environment (including basic X windows w/ TWM) than they could. It made my university days much more tolerable and productive, right up until I was forced to use OS/2 2.1, which I also fondly remember for no other reason than I could communicate with the actual developers via email and they'd respond about issues I was having writing device drivers.

    Good times.

  401. First linux install. by Rufty · · Score: 1

    My first linux install was at Easter 94. A friend of a friend was back visiting his folks in Canada, and had left his dorm room unlocked. So me and the friend (hiya Mandel!) put linux on his machine. Couldn't get it out of 40 column mode, though...

    --
    Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  402. wrote a C++ course by Coop · · Score: 1

    I installed Linux in April 1994, when the current Slackware kernel was 0.99pl14. A friend, Hal, had been encouraging me to use it for months since he knew I liked UNIX and hated Windows. I had a deal to deliver a C++ course and I needed tools to write it, so Hal gave me Slackware on a dozen or so floppies. I installed it on a 386 with 8 megs of RAM. I learned LaTeX and wrote a 200+ page course, viewing the LaTeX output with xdvi and compiling the lab exercises with g++. It worked wonderfully, no problems and no crashes. I remember that emacs took a long time to load, about a minute and 15 seconds, because it did floating point ops for font scaling and the 386 didn't have a FPU. So I would load emacs when I brought up the window manager (OpenLook I think) and then just let it sit there until I needed it. I think that Metafont (part of a LaTeX installation) use FP ops extensively too.

    At the time a friend was authoring a C++ textbook on a 486 with 16 megs of RAM, using MS Word on Windows. He had constant crashes and problems because, among other things, it was too much for the machines of the day. But LaTeX easily handled my book, because of it's tight coding and it's data streams in, data streams out model. WYSIWYG word processors just weren't a good idea for large documents at the time. I would then print LaTeX's dvi output files on an HP LaserJet IIP for reproduction at a copy shop. I taught the course for the first time in August 1994 and several times after that. LaTex was a bigger learning curve than Linux by a factor of 5. I've been a Linux user and advocate ever since. I no longer use LaTeX but no one's holding my data hostage -- I can still install LaTeX and make changes to the course 15 years later. The only difference is that on today's machines it runs a lot faster!

    --
    "If you're not passionate about your operating system, you're married to the wrong one."
  403. How do you Spell It? by jvp · · Score: 1

    There's no way I'll spell this right, but my first distro was off a Yggdrasil(sp?) CD, back in 1994. I can remember trying to get it to work with the SCSI CDROM I had connected to my Pro Audio Spectrum sound card, of all things (what a way to do a SCSI controller...) Once installed, I loaded FVWM as my window manager, and instantly went to work trying to overhaul its appearance to look like the Motif window manager (mwm). That included digging into the source code and... changing it a bit. :-)

    jas

    --
    Jason Van Patten
  404. help by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    IIRC, my first Linux (or might've been UNIX) experience went something along the lines of:

    telnet

    $ dir
    command not found

    $ help
    command not found

    $ quit
    command not found

    $ help
    command not found

    $ exit

    Was '95 and, as I recall, would've been a Mud server running on a 386. Went back confused to the admin, was pointed out to try "man", and was on my way.

  405. Swearing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time (late 90s) I swore a lot and gave up. Things just weren't how they were "meant" to be... I couldn't access floppies, couldn't access CDs, couldn't find the settings I wanted, couldn't get help I could understand...

    Thankfully things have improved since then (and I've learned a lot) and I now run linux on all my computers, but the culture shock of trying to migrate from a cpm/dos/win95 upbringing to an alien GUI requiring much CLI coddling on rather crappy (even back then) poorly supported hardware was not a pleasant experience.

  406. Shutdown my CT miniframe. by nsaspook · · Score: 1

    First thing was to copy over my BBS news server and database from a Convergent Technologies MiniFrame to a big shiny 486 linux server. http://www.textfiles.com/bbs/BBSLISTS/bbucket9201s.txt

    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  407. It was mid 1997... by willy.glover · · Score: 1

    And i had my last argument i would ever have with windows about the stability of my computer. I was to the point of buying a new computer, which i couldn't exactly afford to do at the time. In a last act of desperation before doing so, i remembered the handed down copy of Redhat 4.2, given to me by a friends brother who had tried for weeks to get it running, to no avail. I tried and was more successful, taking ONLY two weeks to configure my Soundblaster AWE64, Rockwell 28.8 ISA modem (FULL hardware modem might i ad, cant beat an ISA modem with a chip count in the teens weighing 2+ pounds!) and VLB 1MB S3 virge video card on my AMD K6-166 with 32MB RAM and a Quantum Bigfoot 2.1GB HDD (who remembers the Quantum Bigfoot!!?? the thing was slow as xmas and ran hot enough to warrant a custom dremel and fan job). The two weeks it took to get everything running were at the same time, the most exciting, and the most frustrating times in my computing life. I learned by feel, running commands and seeing what would happen, thereby discovering man, and all else is history. Besides the excitement of learning something new, I gained new stability. I went from 10+ blue screens a day, corrupted hard drives, various driver problems to a SINGLE unexpected kernel panic till the day i retired the machine due to a misplaced coke perched above my open computer as well as uptimes in weeks. Like many other here relate, it changed the way i think about computers, and just things in general. It made me a better problem solver and a more critical thinker and now, 12 or so years later, Linux is my profession. I vowed from that point to never again pay for the privilege of badly written software when I could run software written by people passionate about computing for the advancement of all us, rather than for the advancement of stock price. Not to mention, I was legally able to modify and extend my new operating system and contribute my changes and ideas to a worldwide community that shared my new found passion. In short, the first thing I did with linux was actually be able to use my computer, and enjoy doing it. As a side benefit, I found i didnt need to smoke a pack a day. Linux saved my faith in computing and my lungs!

  408. CDs in a book by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Picked up a copy of "Linux Configuration and Installation" with Slackware 3.something CDs in it for a buck at a bookstore going-out-of-business sale in 1998. The price was right, and it seemed like a good way to prove my 1337ness and learn something about "that UNIX stuff" at the same time. After a mere month of fiddling with and waving dead chickens over it (hack the kernel to probe the correct IRQ for my ne2000 ISA NIC, download a newer Xfree86 release that supported my video card, pay Opensound their outrageous $20 for a driver that would power up my AD1816 card's pre-amplifier, etc) I had a working machine.

    The first thing I did with it? Install samba and xsmbrowser and start downloading music off the dorm LAN!

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  409. My first linux installation was Freebsd by zx-15 · · Score: 1

    The year was 2001. I went out and bought a cd with Freebsd 4.x, then borrowed a 1G Quantum hard drive, quite old at the time and installed it in my Pentium MMX 200Mhz 32Mb Ram alongside 2Gb seagate circa 1998. I didn't know about a possibility of dual-booting, so I installed Freebsd on a separate hard drive, and to switch between freebsd and windows 98 on the main system, I had to tweak some bios settings.

    I didn't know anything about shell, for that matter I didn't know any better, but did I manage to type 'startx' after I logged in as 'root' and for some reason X worked the first time, that I was able to log into kde that displayed a rather nice red theme with warnings about dangers of running as root. Then the only thing I did, I played 'bomberman' with my buddies three people at a time on the same keyboard. I heard about the game, but couldn't find cd for it and Freebsd had a decent clone of it!

    Eventually I had to give back that quantum disk, and my experiments with alternative operating systems ended at the time.

    I returned, this time to Linux, in 2004 I started with Mandrake 9.* then moved to Fedora 4, and when my dual monitor setup, failed with an upgrade to fedora 5, I finally switch to Debian, which I've been using since.

  410. Distributed Computing by saturndude · · Score: 1

    I ran the distributed.net client for a couple of projects because I wanted to help them out. In July 1998 I was still running Windows 3.1 (true story!). Distributed.net didn't have a client for Windows 3.1, I still didn't have Win9x, and their DOS client, well, was unitasking, like DOS. I couldn't enjoy my PC and help them out too. I repartitioned hard drive space and started dual-booting with Caldera 1.2 (kernel 2.0.33).

    Ran on a AMD K5-166, 96 or 128 MB RAM. Task switching was so much smoother than Windows (preemptive instead of cooperative multitasking, IIRC). I was hooked!

    Today I spend 95% of my time in Linux (and 5% in XP).

  411. We did replace our SCO Unix Installation by nethead23 · · Score: 1

    Back in 1991 or 1992, before _any_ distributions had been on the market, i did download the 386 kernel and the neccessary sources to replace our (student living community) SCO Unix server. So the first thing ive done with linux was compiling it and then using it as news and mail server. I am actually still doing this today.

  412. I tried it on a 286 by fizzup · · Score: 1

    The first time I tried Slackware on an 80286 in 1992 in my residence at university. I didn't have a 386. I just wanted to see what would happen. IIRC, even the boot sector code required a 386.

  413. Tried to change from bash to tsch by blanchae · · Score: 1

    In 1994, while installing from floppies, I decided to use tsch for the root shell as I was more familar with it from Sun instead of bash. It failed miserably as Linux looks for a bash shell to run the startup scripts, I was also locked out from root. I had to start over again. That was my first lesson about Linux. One of the most rewarding learning experiences in the late 90s was to install a bare bone version of Slackware on a 386 laptop with 5 MB of RAM and a 30 MB hard-drive. Got X windows up and internet access with a web-browser. It was painfully slow but it worked. Determining which programs were absolutely necessary and which weren't was quite an eye opener.

  414. 1995, Slackware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    w :_O

  415. LinuxMagic... Thanks Linus by Linuxmagic · · Score: 1

    It was in the days of OS2 which I was experimenting with, It was SO better than windows.. however, I had a dream of creating a great new multi player game with THOUSANDS of players, using this internet thing.. and I needed good multi tasking but I was really poor.. I think it was 0.98. They said that you couldn't run it on 4 MEG of ram, but it worked.. I think I was running about 32 hours for a kernel compile.. but MAN Linus.. I had something to look forward to didn't I :) So, now years later... I never did get that game online.. but LinuxMagic was borne...

  416. Mandrake by swehack · · Score: 1

    First contact with Linux was Mandrake in a PC magazine i bought. Installed, clicked around, saw nothing special but was still very interested so i tried RedHat 7 when it came out in another issue of the same magazine.

    Clicked around a bit, played konquest and then finally figured out how to change my window manager, i was now hooked. Then i hacked my ISP and got an angry letter home to my mom about 'netiquette'.

  417. First exposure to Linux by drissel · · Score: 1

    I was working in a Sun shop ... a buddy asked me to sit and type some commands ... worked ok. He showed me it was a pc. (Blush) I asked him how in the world he got Solaris working on a pc.

    Regards,
        Bill

  418. Redhat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't remember which version it was, but I remember it was such a pain in the arse to setup that I finally gave up. It wasn't until later that I found Mandrake Linux and was able to finally install it. I liked the GUI and the install was actually very friendly. I used it on an older PC and set it up as my home router/firewall. Never had a problem with it until my hardware finally failed from old age.

  419. Started sending spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the purpose for the box. In my defense I was asked to send the spam to our customers by management and the term spam didn't exist yet (but it was spam)... It's still probably performing its mission locked in some closet somewhere. I moved on over a decade ago...

  420. Firewall/router by dsoltesz · · Score: 1

    First installation was SuSE (don't recall the version, but it was maybe 1997 or 1998) - pretty much was just messing around with it. First actual use was setting up SuSE for an Apache web server on a new Dell server at work to replace an old DEC Alpha (True64/Netscape FastTrack).

  421. 1998 by metachimp · · Score: 1

    SUsE 5.2

    I remember reading so much about how tough Linux could be to get up and running, but I remember how easy it was. I was up and using it within an hour or two.

    I remember how psyched I was that it breathed new life into an older computer that I had. I was hooked.

    --
    The system has failed you, don't fail yourself. --Billy Bragg
  422. What? No OS/2? First-day-at-job panic! by Tirs · · Score: 1

    Well, I was hired to maintain the OS/2 company file server; no sweat, since I was quite familiar with OS/2. When I showed up, they said: "Oh, by the way, we also have a penguin server you'll have to take care of; its admin guy is in the States for a couple of months". My reply was: "Waitaminute... what is a 'penguin' server?"
    Of course the guy had adopted the "X11 in servers is for sissies" policy, so for two months I was frantically browsing man pages in the morning and (also) frantically sending e-mails to the admin guy in a timezone six hours away from ours to ask the simplest things. And, believe it or not, the second day I remembered a silly joke I had read somewhere and not understood: "man woman". From there I discovered the most useful command in Linux.

    Nowadays I am the main admin of six happy corporate penguins, plus two at /home/tirs, er... I mean, at home.

    P.S: X11 in servers IS for sissies.

    --
    Strength, balance, courage and reason. If you know what's this about, contact me!
  423. My first linux install LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fearlessly cruised Russian sites so toxic they crashed the Windows boxes that my ISP used.
      For days on end the (Arizona ) dsl service known as Frontier would be down every time I crustily cruised some .ru sites.

  424. hack my sack by evanspw · · Score: 1

    1997, a 166MHz P1 on a 2GB hard disk, slackware, 2.0.0 kernel. Ran fvwm. Worked very nicely. Mostly I was doing website design, using nedit and netscape. they were the days!

    --
    Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
  425. Ahh my first time... by DJGravitron · · Score: 1

    Every Linux geek remembers their first time - the feeling is not unlike that "other" first time (indeed, I lost my Linux virginity a decade before my "other" first time occurred).

    Back in the days of HTTP1.0 and Netscape 4.76,
    before WEB 2.0 was even conceptualized, in the
    grand year of 1997, yours truly grabbed a free
    copy of Redhat Mandrake 5.0 (I believe), which
    came with the newly developed 2.0 kernel and all sorts of goodies.

    I was reading either PC World or some other piece
    of computing literature when I saw something that really caught my eye as a budding Internet (yeah,
    not just the WWW, EVERYTHING) geek, game geek, game developer, game modder and first-order code geek; Linux.

    Something about a free OS that I could install on my own computer that was based on UNIX tickled
    the neurons in my brain.
    I was forever hooked on Open Source software and the raw, feral command-line driven experience that was Linux.

    I believe I wiped my hard disk and tried to dual-boot it (successfully, I might add) after installing Windows 98SE (for games, primarily).
    I spent hours trying to figure out which packages I wanted to cram onto my (then huge) 1 GB hard disk.
    Eventually, it was installed and I spent hours programming, running programs and bash scripts in more or less the same way as the Forefathers had done in the Age of Bell Labs.

    I was 17 then; 12 years later I still love Linux, and have a solid Slackware distro installed and am planning on installing a secondary hard disk
    to make it a Linux-only install, as opposed to dual-booting it.

    Sometimes, I wish I could relive those days...
    Ahh well.

    =- Gravitron -=

  426. dial-on-demand internet gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow. 600 comments and yours is the only one mentioning SuSE. I started with suse as well, 6.0 I think (or 5.2 - the one with the 2.0.36 kernel). I had a spare machine (amd k6), and installed suse basically to play with it. The first thing I did with it (don't remember why) was installing openssh-server, so I never played with the old X desktops.

    I had little trouble configuring the machine, initially I did everything via yast - which is still the best system configuration tool I think. The machine started out as fileserver for my dorm (samba), then I moved my modem card from my desktop into the "server" and setup pppd for dial-on-demand. It ran like that for almost a year, then we moved to ADSL (pppoe was hell to set up). When support for the distro stopped, I moved to manual compilation of all packages. The box moved to a 2.4 kernel, glibc2 and samba3 before I moved out and retired it.

    I never really used SuSE on my desktop. I bought the last pre-Novell version (9.3?), but when I installed it I also picked up interest in LinuxFromScratch and so it almost immediately got replaced. After that, my desktop went to Ubuntu Breezy, and remained that way until Intrepid scared me away (Jaunty is much better). Now I'm running Debian testing.

    Oh, and I love apt. I'm currently mixing and matching packages from Debian (testing/unstable), Ubuntu (jaunty) and Mint (felicia), and apt can update them all from their respective sources.

  427. Gentoo by luxifr · · Score: 1

    It was in January 2006 when I made my first REAL expreiences with linux... back then i decided to try gentoo first as i thought i'd learn most by installing this distro and getting it to run... back then there was no automated installer... "the installer is YOU" they said :)

  428. Surfing Web and Mandrake GNU/Linux by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    I think my first interaction was visiting webpages served up by Apache/GNU Linux.

    After that, a Mandrake Move GNU/Linux Live CD I ordered online.

    Some time after that, I ordered an Ubuntu GNU/Linux CD, after that, I downloaded my own Ubuntu install CD

    It's been a great experience thus far, although I do wish some guys would have exercise more pride, integrity, and responsibility in their work related to many of the applications . . . that's what gets me, I am neither talking about an "ugly" GUI (who cares) nor asking for rocket science so to speak . . . stupid little fuckups that are never paid attention to . . . I have said it before and I will say it again: I would shoot myself if MY product (in any field of endeavor) were that shoddy! Never. Better not release than release something shitty, I don't mean an early release, I mean releasing something decent, even if in Beta.

    --
    SARAVA!
  429. SuSE 4.2 - with assert failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first tried Linux in... I don't know, the mid-90s or so, probably 95 or 96; IIRC, it was SuSE 4.2.

    However, it didn't last long: when I tried to install it, YaST would always die with an assert failure at a certain point. I didn't know anything about C back then and had absolutely no idea what this meant, so I just took the box back to the shop where I got it and returned it.

    A few years later, I tried again with SuSE 5.3, and that actually worked.

  430. Happy to have a similar environment to class by Status+Quo · · Score: 1

    I bought Slackware at the local computer store and installed it on my machine. I had to dual boot because the CD-ROM was connected to the sound card. However, all my engineering classes used UNIX instead of Windows, so I was happy to start poking around my own system and try to figure out how to make everything (or most everything) work. It was fun.

    --
    I'll never be as good as I want to be. I can only be as good as I am.
  431. Mandrake 10 by Rebel+Persev · · Score: 1

    I was trying to get through tech school using Windows ME for school work and web surfing, I had heard of Linux and ordered a copy of Mandrake 10 and installed that. Never looked back.

  432. Here's one for the history books by jaunty · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember Yggdrasil? Beautiful CD with graphical installation. I think it came with a boot floppy (maybe two), and a CD. Don't remember too much about the installation, because it was about 1993/4 when I first started with this, but I can remember the first time I read "kernel panic". My brother and I, who shared my fascination with linux, sat there and laughed when we read that. After reading the thick book that accompanied the installation software, we figured out what was wrong, and started again. Finally got everything installed and running, and then we were hooked.

    Thanks to all the developers along the way, who have kept this hobby interesting for me.

    --
    Why did I post this? Ask me now!
  433. First Things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The very first thing I did was to try to compile freenix on my Amiga. It didn;t work. Later I did install Caldera on my then dual boot windows/OS2 machine making it triple boot. Not bad for the time :-)

  434. used sc and jove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to track my mutual funds and write a journal (miscellaneous Thoughts and where or when I had caught pike bass pickerel or whitefish or partridge or planted or dug up potatoes etc.) Slackware 2.1.

  435. My first Linux install... by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 1

    ... was from a SuSE 5.2 CD that came with PC Plus magazine *years* ago. I installed that on a Pentium P100 with 64MB of RAM, and just about got it working. Then I gave in and went back to Win98 for a bit.

    In early '01 I had a play with Linux From Scratch, installed that on a Toshiba T2130CS laptop (486/75, 8MB RAM, 2GB hard drive and an 800x600 colour passive-matrix LCD) and used that for a couple of years. Did a few upgrades on the home desktop machine (which ended up becoming a 500MHz K6-II box with an 8GB HDD) and pretty much left the laptop alone. Truth be told, it ran Linux far better than it ran Win98... The desktop box ended up running Slackware.

    Some time in '05 I upgraded the desktop machine -- that became an Athlon64 3200+, with 512MB RAM, the same 8GB HDD, and some other bits. I ran Slackware on that for a while, then switched to Fedora in mid-2006.

    Last year I switched to Ubuntu (after seeing it running on a friend's machine and exclaiming "I don't believe it, they tamed Debian!") and I've been running that on two laptops (an IBM T42 and an Eee 1000H) and the desktop (overclocked Q6600, 4GB, Geforce GTX260, 2x500GB fakeraid-1 + 500GB + 500GB USB).

    On top of that, I've got a neat little Jetway mini-ITX board in a 1U rack-case, running Ubuntu Server on a 2x500GB softRAID. That thing is basically running my home network -- Windows domain control, file sharing and network routing. Installation took about half an hour, and most of that was down to my repeatedly screwing up the RAID configuration and partitioning...

    I still use Windows, but not as much as I used to (I basically run Linux all the time on the laptops, the desktop runs Windows most of the time because I'm too lazy to reboot into Linux after I've finished playing with XP).

  436. XBILL by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    How could it be any different? First thing I did on my Red Hat 6.0 or so was to fireup xbill and enjoy squashing the bastard for hours.

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  437. 1994, Slackware, CU-SeeMe by jfederline · · Score: 1

    We'd been running OS2 Warp beta's next to Slackware with kernel 0.99 hacking around in the university lab, where we managed Win 3.1, MacOS, Netware and AIX for the past year. I was a pine addict after shaking my elm addiction, and had sworn off emacs for vi forever. Then, we started doing digital video editing on Windows 3.1 with Adobe Premier and some nice capture card hardware... ...and then I found CU-SeeMe live video reflector. But it wouldn't compile on Linux, so I hacked it grunge style to eliminate the errors, and, LO, it worked. We did a live streaming internet video broadcast in 1994. Thanks Linux!

  438. I learned at a very young age... by indrora · · Score: 1

    I grew up in California, and had a friend who worked on the FreeSwan project. I would hang out at his house and sit in the computer lab downstairs. All his machines ran some flavor of *nix, and I used to just oogle at them (mostly because I wasnt quite smart enough to understand GNOME on his laptop running RedHat 4) however one day i got the gusto to sit and use it. He gave me an account so i could work, and I started messing around with KDE and such. I was a child with linux. However I wouldnt consider that my first *real* experience with Linux, as it was a pass-bye.

    my first *real* experience with Linux came when I moved from California to where i am now. I had been given a fancy new 2.9Ghz Athlon machine running Windows XP back in 2004. I loved the machine for all it was worth, but decided to run Linux on it. I had picked up a copy of RedHat 5 with a book from my local used computer shop. It wasnt fancy, and it wouldnt install because I was using Bill Gate's Crap FileSystem NTFS. I installed it onto an older machine (a K6 3DNow! box, chugging along at 900mhz) and got to know the shell pretty loosley, however i could never get to compiling the kernel. This lead me to get Mandrake 10 from the local bookshop, which had a few linux books and such. I installed it on my main machine and was building things from source in no time. All this has lead me to run Ubuntu on big fancy rack-mounted server machines with 64GiB of RAM and 3.4PiB total disk space, but to appreciate the simplicity and run Debian on 200Mhz Compaq servers with 64mb of ram.

    If anything, What did Linux do with me? Linux taught me the zen of simplicity.

  439. hmmm lemme think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh Ya
    Ubuntu 4.1 on a 768Mhz desktop

  440. Rough start ... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

    There are some hardcore old timers on this page ... my first brush with Linux was RedHat 5.1 in 1998, paired with an Oracle install. RAID card wasn't supported at the time. I had a baaaaaaad time and had to crawl back to NT 4.0 instead. I remained interested and when the chance produced itself in 2001 to setup a bunch of Linux servers, I lept. I've had at least 2 machines running Linux since early 2001 and as many as 2 dozen at one point, spread across a bunch of data centers. Linux is just sooooo nice on servers ... absolutely love it. I did Linux on a laptop for about 5 years too, but use a Mac now since it has the same UNIX goodness underneath.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  441. Assuming you mean on my OWN machine... by KBKarma · · Score: 1

    I got an eeePC 1000 with Xandros. First thing I TRIED to do was open a terminal. It failed. Miserably. The first thing I did on the MACHINE was install the eeePC Ubuntu kernel from array.org. Then, the first thing I actually DID was install Opera, get it connected, and surf the web while surfing the web (on my XP desktop). Taking pictures with both webcams was another amusement.

    --
    Rolling a d20 is not grounds for investment.
  442. Redhat 6.2 by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    My first Linux experience was Redhat 6.2 on a Pentium 100 with 32MB RAM.
    I spent two days tweaking my XF86 config file to get it to display on my monitor at 800x600, including the time it took to learn emacs/vi. When I finally got it up and running, I tried to play some MP3s in the background with something that looked like a copy of Winamp, but unlike Winamp, the sound stuttered if I did anything more than simply play the file, and multitasking seemed to result in a kernel panic.

    Since then, I've tried newer Redhats, Dragonlinux, Phatlinux, a few Mandrakes, Gentoo (never became bootable), and a few generations of Ubuntu... I use Ubuntu on my OLPC XO-1 because it beats the Sugar interface, and the package manager is first class... but that's about it. Elsewhere it's still XP and OSX.

  443. Jan 1994 - Now get off my lawn! by Ark · · Score: 1

    It was the start of the second semester of my Freshman year at UIUC. After using the student unix machines for half a semester and getting a basic understanding of this unix thing thanks to playing and some friends on IRC, I wanted to learn more, so I figured putting it on my own machine was the way to go. (Also, too many of my dormmates kept taking over my computer to play Dune II, so it was side benefit.)

    I had a 486DX 66MHz with 4 MB of RAM and a 120MB drive, and borrowed about 20 floppies from a warez friend of mine to copy slackware down to. I can't remember which version, but I do remember a .98pl kernel. Luckily, we had a net connected computer lab in our dorm, so downloading the floppies was fairly quick and painless. Well, as painless as loading up 20 floppies is. Seemed painless then, now I'd hang myself. A friend who had already been running linux for awhile helped me with some n00b questions like "What the hell does this partition stuff mean?" After a few months and getting my feet under me, I quickly upgraded to 8 MB RAM so I could run X without swapping when the mouse moved.

    As others have stated in my thread, my career and computing life would have been radically different without the deeper understanding of how computers work, how to debug, how to read logs, etc that Linux helped me develop. Of course, there was a price to this knowledge, I did not get laid nearly enough at college. :)

    Now I have a quad core 2.4Ghz machine with 4 GB of RAM and a 1TB harddrive. Now get off my lawn!

    1. Re:Jan 1994 - Now get off my lawn! by Ark · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add what I first did...run IRC under screen. Huh, I still do that...

    2. Re:Jan 1994 - Now get off my lawn! by linky · · Score: 1

      Of course, there was a price to this knowledge, I did not get laid nearly enough at college.

      That you would leap out of your bunk, leaving your naked, nubile freshman girlfriend behind, the moment said box shouted "BUTTHEAD! BUTTHEAD! COME HERE QUICK!" in response to an IRC /msg, is entirely your fault.

      --
      WHOA!! Ken and Barbie are having TOO MUCH FUN!! It must be the NEGATIVE IONS!!
  444. masquerading ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first thing i did with linux, was
    share the dial-up modem, enable masquerading,
    then setup samba so i could invite over my friend
    and hunt for sexy girl pics ; )

  445. Watched two times the same animation on a 486 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    it was a Slackware distro and the time was... Hmmm 1995 or something. I installed it on a 486 and I had some "media player" running an animation file, I think it was a .flv file, where you could see some huge ship flying over what looked like a desert. It only lasted a few seconds and I wish I could find that animation back.

    But the amazing thing, to me, was that it was smooth. So frigging smooth, and I could two of these animations at the same time. And issue commandes in an xterm. On that same machine Windows 95 was a dog, a super slow dog.

    Besides that I was "compiling" (?) big LaTeX documents and that was taking ages :)

    Oh, and I set up a PLIP network using a null cable between my two desktop to share my dial-up Internet access.

    These were the days :)

  446. early linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1994
    spent a weekend waiting for the X11R6 .tgz slackware files to download through my 14400 modem
    nobody in my family got to use the phone that weekend

  447. Surfed the net by astroe · · Score: 1

    My first contact with Linux occured in 1996. I was in high school and I opened a telnet connection from a DOS box to a RedHat 5.0 server and used lynx to browse the web and pine to read my email. During the next three years (1996-1999), the Internet was an all-Linux all-textmode world for me.

  448. Debian from "boot" magazine demo disc by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember "boot" magazine? They were kind of a computer power user magazine in the late 90's. One month they ran a feature on alternative operating systems, and included Debian 2.0 on their demo disc.

    I managed to get it installed and dual-booting with Win 95, although I never got X working. Played a little Nethack and some light programming but didn't really touch Linux for a couple more years. Later I dual booted Red Hat 7.0 and SuSE 8.0, finally went Windows-free with Mandrake 9.1.

    After that it was Fedora, then Gentoo, then Ubuntu - which I'm currently running on my desktop and netbook.

    My heartfelt thanks to Linus, Stallman, and all the people who make open source possible and successful.

  449. SuSE 6.2 / Roaring Penguin by talexb · · Score: 1

    In 2000 or so I managed to install SuSE 6.2 on my spare P400 box, and somehow made a connection through my ADSL modem thanks to Roaring Penguin's scripts. I was absolutely thrilled, and ftp'd into my web provider, tried Alt-F2 to start other sessions, the works. I shut it down, and the Internet connection never worked after that.

    I then battled with X-Windows, fiddling with the contents of the configuration script, all the while very wary of blowing up my one CRT with the wrong Sync values. The system wasn't usable, and I had no idea what I was doing, so I shelved it, and remained a Windows 98 guy running VanDyke Systems excellent ssh and ftp clients into my employer's machines.

    Really, I knew so little when I set that original SuSE box up, I'm amazed that I got it working at all. I do plan to install SuSE 6.2 again, just to see if it's as clunky as I thought it was. Should be amusing.

  450. troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a second ... let me get this straight.

    There are females that use Linux?

  451. Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that "command line" operating systems are used for nefarious purposes, and therefore it is legitimate for law enforcement to put all "black screen" users under arrest proactively.

  452. i was a dapper dude by moriarty6 · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu Dapper on a rusty Compaq laptop. Worked great, except it took me forever to get the wireless working. After that, tried every distro I could get my hands on, including the weird ones. Now, back with Ubuntu Jaunty.

  453. my linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in 91, I got linux 0.99 up and running on a gateway 386. No gui, but had a 80x50 terminal. The highest res terminal in the office.

    My first personal pc was a Dell 486DX. I purchased it to run linux and got dell to not charge for the ms os and ship w/o os. Was able to get X running on this machine.

    Ran RedHat for a while until they went commercial. I bounced around trying several distros until settling with debian. Ran debian for several years.

    Today I run Ubuntu throughout my home network. I have a NAS, Firewall, MythTV server and my desktop all running Ubuntu. No windows in sight other than the emulated one I play WoW in :)

    Wayne Hogue

  454. gopher + web server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what else? The question was bsd or linux, I was not going to run a webserver in VAX VMS or a Mac 9 (other coleagues did) and the owners of the three NeXT workstations in our lab where not going to donate them. So linux was the answer. It worked.

  455. Compile Kernel by Zakias · · Score: 1

    System had to run faster. Remove support for all devices not absolutely needed (and, of course, add my sound card).

    Kernel 2.0.24 on Red Hat 4, circa 1996ish. Special shouts out to |ferret| who got me into it :-)

    cd /usr/src/linux
    make mrproper
    make dep
    make clean
    make zImage
    make modules
    make modules_install

    sheesh... now it's just sudo apt-get upgrade....

    1. Re:Compile Kernel by disi · · Score: 1

      No RedHat expert, but was there no:
      make config
      To configure every little stupid module line by line? :D
      I think later on they intruduced the .config support...

  456. Minix in 2005 by deakons · · Score: 1

    My first experience was an installation of Minix. The main purpose was to figure what the fork() system call was doing. This foray leads me to research for my phd on modifying the scheduler for increased energy efficency.

  457. My first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was triple booting win 3.1 Solaris 2.(something) and SLS something or other. I hard the network card running under windows and Solaris, but it wasn't found under Linux. So a friend at work suggested I look into the network card drivers. I found what looked like where they were probing the io ports, and saw they weren't probing what my card was at. So i added it, recompiled the kernel, and it worked! WHAT A RUSH! (notice how this is STILL impossible with windows (and Solaris) today).

    Then another time I was trying to get Linux to start Xfree86 on a weird monitor I had. I ended up hacking the timing values in the .conf file.

    It worked.

    At that point it was all over but the shouting.

    GRIN the ONLY thing I use windows for (besides work(sigh)) is for playing EQ. And for a while that worked under Linux and Cedega too! (until they dorked up EQ so it wouldn't run any more)

    Oh well.

    OBTW. I don't necessarily want Linux to be everywhere. The more places it is, the more the Gov will want to control it . . .

  458. First linux use... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        Ahhh, memories.

        My first Linux use was a failure. Back in the day, I'd guess the rate was much much higher. I had no *nix experience, but I managed to get the stack of floppies made, and followed step by step through the book (Linux unleashed, 1st edition, when it was first released, which included Slackware), and finally had a working machine. Well, working that it booted. Failed in that I had no clue where to go after that. It's not like I could Google answers like, how do I connect my modem? find me an example of a chat script. Oh ya, we didn't have much there either. Internet connections were limited at best, so I would have been using BBS's with it. :)

        My next attempt was the one that stuck. I could actually install from a CD (oh my gosh), and I got it installed. It was a few months before I got that mystery of X windows working. I explored the net with lynx, and with my 386/16 Windows machine sitting nearby. Finally, I had X working, and my life has been downhill since then. :) I made a working NAT firewall with it, and several months later, it was needed by my office for a gateway, so it became the first server I had worked on too.

        One Linux machine became many. Thundreds, or possibly thousands of machines later (mostly servers), it's a rather odd thing for me to have someone ask me a Linux question that I don't know the answer to, usually through experience.

        I've used just about every major Linux distro, and many minor ones, and many other *nix OS's. I always come back to Slackware.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  459. Caimen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing I did was get a MUD called Godwars to compile and run the server. Oh MUD.

  460. playing games by disi · · Score: 1

    The first I did after I installed Suse 6.3 or something I started testing all the programs on the desktop, especially the tons of games that came with it. :)
    Later on playing Counterstrike...

  461. I built a Beowulf cluster by RoboJ1M · · Score: 1

    For my undergraduate dissertation I studied conservative lookahead algorithms in parallel and distributed simulation of discrete event systems.
    After reading about Beowulf clusters I networked 8 Pentium 90 boxes and installed Red Hat, wrote everything in Java and ran some experiments.
    It was the stupidly hot summer of 2001 and I lived in an loft room with little ventilation. I wrote most of my paper in my underwear.
    J1M.

  462. Re:A RedHat 2 Distro back in 95? 96? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That you like spending time on these things every time you install a Linux might be fun to you. But, not everyone has that privilege. If, I have to spend time on getting my X running, my mouse working and all that, then I would have very little time left for writing code and plotting graphs.

  463. Perseverance paid off by Klink,+you+idiot! · · Score: 1

    What did I first do with Linux? Struggled, cursed it, kept trying, and eventually had a workable installation of OpenLinux and Star Office, but never did get the sound card in that old HP desktop to work, after hours of recompiling. That would have been around 1998, if memory serves. Linux has steadily improved since then, and now I don't struggle much at all with Xubuntu on a well aged but much loved Thinkpad.

  464. Since 2002 by TheMightyFuzzball · · Score: 1

    I've been using linux is some form or other since 2002, it started when I saw my brother running Gentoo (I think)with fluxbox, it was incredibly bare, and for some reason I loved that :) over the years I've seen linux grow into a stable and completely usable desktop. I'm still waiting for a complete and stable KDE 4 though :D

  465. SuSE 6 by drmitch · · Score: 1

    A total pain, as it was SuSE 6.0 (or maybe 5.0) and it took me about 4 days to get my NIC working. I actually BOUGHT the 6 CDs that came with it. I could hardly partition my drive and so I was afraid I'd loose my windows ... oh boo hoo! It's funny, I don't remember my first girlfriend's name...

  466. long time ago.. by AnibalOjeda · · Score: 1

    i still remember 2 important days.. 1 - the first time i saw linux, at a friend house, he showed me Red Hat (dont remember the version) back in 1999, he told me this is going to be the future.. i was like (what the he.. is that) 2 - a couple of months later i was installing slackware linux, i still remember entering X using startx (those where memorable moments) ;-) i could do the startx thing for hours.. i was amaze how a black screen could turn into a graphical environment...

    --
    Saludos, Anibal Ojeda http://anibalnet.nl
  467. Work gave me a RedHat box in the mid/late 90's by johnkzin · · Score: 1

    I reinstalled FreeBSD over it.

  468. Built a gateway machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My very first Linux install was a RedHat circa 5.2 install. I still
    remember the great libc upgrade from libc5 to libc6. I think the first
    really useful thing I achieved was a dial on demand router that would
    connect to the internet whenever anyone in the house accessed the 'net
    via the ethernet cables we had. IIRC getting the PPP dial daemon
    working caused a fair amount of frustration up until I discovered
    wvdial (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wvdial).

  469. My First Copy Cost Over $300.00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to download my first copy of Slackware in 1993 over my $per/hour Compuserve connection on a 9600bps modem. My account maxed-out at $300 and I wasn't even at floppy #40, so I had to wait til I could pay-down the bill and get the rest of what I wanted.

    I only grabbed about 41 or 42 floppy images, I think there were about 50 available. I couldn't figure out how to install it on my brand-new PC that I built, it was all manual back then... It was kernel .99. Getting IDE to work, getting past the bugs in the adaptec 1542 driver, figuring what the hell an inode was, formatting and mounting volumes, figuring out the swap partition, figuring out LILO, installing one package at a time... Easy now, super tough coming from the world of DOS/Novell/OS/2. However, I took a trip down the Weird Stuff electronics to see if they had a cheap copy of OS/2 2.1, and by chance the had a Slackware book that covered installation and configuration... It was a crappy book, but it was pricelesss. I still wish I had it for posterity.

    Once I got it up and running, I figured X all on my own and after two days I was up and running. But after a few months I finally bought an Ethernet card and couldn't figure out how to setup the driver, so I just used Linux once in a while, but mostly sticking to my treasured OS/2.

    Finally, I fully jumped into Linux full force with RedHat 4.0. Though I still preferred my OS/2 box, my goal was to do on the Linux everything I could do on my OS/2 box. It didn't workout that well, Linux could only do about 80% of what I needed at the time, but I learned a damn lot.

    Now I'm mostly a Windows user, but I keep a Linux box around for research and just for keeping up with it. I got out of IT a long time ago, so I have not worked with proper servers in a long time, so no need for Linux in any serious capacity.

    Ay, I miss the old days... I much prefer the old crude Linux days, except for the dearth of hardware support, lol.

  470. Slackware on a 10MB partition by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    My first Linux experience was back in school about 1995, when one of my friends wanted to show me how awesome it was.

    We somehow freed up about 10MB of space of the 40 MB disk on mum & dad's computer, and repartitioned it to install whatever version of Slackware was current at the time.

    So what was so awesome about a 10 MB installation? I asked, and I was shown how cool it was to be able to switch between several different text consoles. (That multitasking sure beats DOS or Windows 3.1!) Another supposedly impressive feature was how you could change the font of the text consoles to be something more italicised and comicey! The Slackware installer of the day let you do this.

    The other awesome thing I could apparently do, which my friend mentioned as he was leaving, was recompile the kernel. Wow! Of course on a 10 MB installation, I didn't actually have a compiler, or any kernel source, or a working modem to get any kernel source, and to be honest I didn't know what a kernel was or why I'd care about compiling it. But if I'd been able to, I'm sure that recompiling the kernel over and over again would have kept me completely satisfied. I bet it would have been better than staring at a command prompt all day with barely any storage space and no applications to run.

    I couldn't figure out how to switch the text back to a normal font after my friend had gone, when it was hurting my eyes. Not that it really mattered, because I didn't spend a lot of time booting into Linux, except for when I wanted to feel cool. :P

    So my Slackware installation of 1995 didn't last terribly long. In later years I tried to move to Linux several times with a dual partition, but always had problems due to some Microsoft application lock-ins with certain jobs I was doing for other people, as well as problems getting an X server to run reliably. Since about 2001, though, I've been persistently running Debian on my desktop and laptop computers. I did away with Windows at about that time, and I love it.

  471. ISDN NAT with Debian by felixhummel · · Score: 1

    Back then I couldn't even move vim. It took me quite some time to get the :wq

    But I did it - sharing 64 kB/s with two other guys through an old Pentium with a Fritz Card.

    Those were the days...

  472. looking for alternative to monkey-b nightmare by mrinvader · · Score: 1

    Distro: Redhat 5.2 Apollo

    Hardware: p2 300 128mb ram 100mhz bus on asus p2b. used pin b21 cut hack to get 100mhz bus on 66mhz klamath.

    What I did? : Web browse and just poke around. I played chess, learned shell scripting and file sharing. This experience showed me that this was Where It's At. I switched completely with 6.2 Zoot.

  473. Re:I tried to log in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to log in, but could'nt. Some days later I found out, that the administrator was called root ...

  474. Using SLS in 1993 by zaphodbeeblebrox42 · · Score: 1

    I used Linux and term to multiplex my modem connection to the university so that I could run multiple terminal gopher, vi and shell sessions.

    seriously

  475. glazed over look by bckchrry08 · · Score: 1

    I stared in awe as I middle clicked my display and swished it around it is virtual-3D-cube glory! I swear I needed a mop to clean up my drool.....

    1. Re:glazed over look by E1337Fatal1ty · · Score: 1

      I know what u r talking about. i had a similar experience.

  476. Mmm...? by aaycumi · · Score: 1

    Just started with Ubuntu 7.10 when 8.04 was a few months into beta and loved the whole build you're own operating system thing. But it was hell getting everything to work with nothing but google and some outdated blogging websites to help. In the end I've been using Ubuntu since then even managed to make an ubuntu server that worked inside the college WIndows XP servers, with the help the techs their. Everyone was booting either DSL or ubuntu off USB for the hell of it for a while; mainly to play quake lol. Well that was a while ago and now I'm back to using XP because of the current build of my comp won't work with any linux. Mobile Broadband ain't the hell I'd thought it would be and looking to get back to linux whenever possible and update this thing.

  477. My First Time... by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

    My first time using Linux was to host a MySQL database for an application I was developing for a previous employer.

    Before then, I've never used Linux before, but I did have a Unix account in college. I really just used that to log in and run 'pine' to check my email. I learned a few little commands like 'cd' and 'ls'.

    The original app from that job was just an MS Access database, but I ended up writing a front end in Visual Basic 6.0 and then migrating the DB from Access to MySQL. Instead of hosting MySQL on Windows, I thought I'd try out this new Linux thing, Mandrake 9.0 at the time.

    So I was the lead developer for the project, DB admin, and server admin for the box. :)

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  478. On a really old SuSe install... by Pixis5 · · Score: 1

    ... when the installer wasn't in english yet. At my first prompt I typed "help". Wasn't of much help relly.