Slashdot Mirror


Floor Vacuum Robot for $200

abhikhurana writes "MSNBC is running a review of Roomba, supposedly the first intelligent 'floor vac', as in a cross between vacuum cleaner and a robot. I think its especially suited for lazy bums like me. Just let it loose, sitback and enjoy. There is also a video of how it cleans the floors, which requires windows media player (what else?) to watch it. It seems that the robo cleaner can indeed do that job for which it has been designed. A related article on Techreview has slightly more details about how it works. There is also a website exclusively for Roomba."

353 comments

  1. Wow by molywi · · Score: 1

    I could have used one of these when I was growing up and hated vaccuming the whole house. It took like 2 hours!

    Please send me of these.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you need a beowulf cluster of them to get the job done really quickly!

  2. Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by qurob · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Remember? Robots were going to do EVERYTHING in the 70's and 80's.

    They were going to help us! Everything was robot this, robot that.

    Bring us drinks, cut the lawn (solar power!), vaccuum....

    I'm going to go read all my back issues of Popular Science, I'll find a robot lawn mower or two.

    1. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Robots were going to do EVERYTHING in the 70's and 80's.

      That's right, somewhere, somebody probably has a business plan from 1971 that says:

      1. Build robots
      2. ?????
      3. Profit!

    2. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Red+Weasel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Totally and completely Off Topic but does anyone else find it funny that the Ballmer article to the side of the main page has 666 posts

      Older Stuff
      Thursday October 17

      Ballmer Sees Free Software as Enemy No. 1 (666)

      --
      ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    3. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by silvaran · · Score: 2

      You have to wonder if, without these predictions, we would have these robots now. False hopes of the future spurred research, and may deliver, albeit a little late, the very predictions we made long ago.

      Remember? The world used to be flat:

      A: "I'll travel around the world!"
      B: "But... you'll fall off the edge.."
      A: "No, the world is round, watch, I'll prove it..."
      B: "But...!" (feels tap on shoulder)
      A: "See?"

    4. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robots! Robots! Robots!

    5. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by cbriscoe · · Score: 1
      I checked this out the other day after reading about it in the latest issue of Popular Science. There is a graphical demo on their site http://www.irobot.com/

      I admit I am lazy. I just may head down to Brookstone or Sharper Image and pick me up one of these. Now if they just had a robot that could clean my toilet and shower.

    6. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Yeah funny you should mention the robots of the 80's

      Tomy had a line of robots called the omnibot line. Included in the lineup was a little guy called "vacbot" if I remember correctly. It's not nearly the vaccum the one in the article is (had less power than a dustbuster, would only work on flat surfaces,cliff avoidance was a simple switch that made the thing turn right)

      Just wanted to have a short flashback.

    7. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or blow me

    8. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by holmesIV · · Score: 1
      cut the lawn

      There are robots that cut the lawn. Though they aren't solar powered.

      Here's a review by someone whose be using it over a year.

      Of course it is still cheaper to just hire the kid down the street, and edges and sweeps too.

    9. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we comprimise on devil worshiping robots? That way everybody's happy. (or unhappy...)

    10. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Spunk · · Score: 2

      Wait no longer, your solar robot lawnmower is here! And it seems to function very much like the Roomba.

      I want one of each!

    11. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by captainstupid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Instead of robots, we got helper monkies.

      They can do way more useful stuff than robots...
      Steal doughnuts from the donut shop by stringing multiple doughnuts on their tail and arms.

      They aren't forced to abide by those crazy moral laws that are supposed to be built into robots.

      --
      "Anyway, long story short... is a phrase whose origins are complicated and rambling...." - Abraham Simpson
    12. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      Now if they just had a robot that could clean my toilet and shower.

      They do, it's called "a housekeeping service".

    13. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by buttahead · · Score: 1

      the news article found here is from 1998. I can't find prices anywhere, nor can I tell if it is still being sold. Anyone else have info on the lawn-bot?

    14. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when their cleaning power is all used up, you can just get a new monkey in any of three designer colors.

    15. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by pcol · · Score: 1

      How about going back to the 1950's. First mention I can find of the concept is in Robert A. Heinlein's "The Door into Summer" - an old sf novel built around a designer who lives in the 1970's who builds the first domestic robot - a robotic vacuum-cleaner called "Hired Girl". Book was copyrighted in 1957. Can anybody take it back any further?

    16. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how many Thorsen memory tubes does this thing use?

    17. Re:Let's go back in time to the 1980's.... by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      A robot to cut the lawn?

      It's called a "goat" (or in some places, a "sheep").

  3. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I bet that robot really "sucks"

    Ahahahahaha.

    1. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With apologies to Mel Brooks:

      "It's gone from suck to blow!"

    2. Re:First Post by esobofh · · Score: 1

      A beowulf cluster of these would *REALLY* suck.

      --

      ----------------------------
      Esobofh - Currently drinking fresh mango juice.
    3. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suck the cum right out of your penis before you even ejaculate!

  4. Vacuum? by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they crazy?!? Everyone knows that nature abhors a vacuum. When a vacuum and normal matter meet there's an enormous explosion. Or implosion. Or something.

    1. Re:Vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, i think you mean when ANTI-MATTER and MATTER collide there is a discharge of energy. not a vacuum.

  5. meoooooow! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Fluffy? Where are you Fluffy?

    1. Re:meoooooow! by Salden · · Score: 1

      My cat is terrified of the vacuum cleaner and when I vacuum, it takes about 20 minutes to do the whole house. This thing would give my cat a heart attack.

    2. Re:meoooooow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fluffy? Where are you Fluffy?"

      He's been assimilated. Now your vacuum will conquer the galaxy and cough hairballs on your carpet.

    3. Re:meoooooow! by tadheckaman · · Score: 0

      WOOOO! Thats the point... RIGHT?

      --
      My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
  6. too easy by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

    $200...
    sucks...

    ahh, nevermind

    1. Re:too easy by da3dAlus · · Score: 2

      I think you're referring to the 2000 SUX...

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  7. Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That my Aibo can plug itself back in, but this thing can't? Seriously, how hard would it be to remember a room, vacuum it, and return to a docking station while I'm at work? What good is this thing *unless* it does that? I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Why is it... by atathert · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, let me see. It could be because your Aibo is approximately an order of magnitude more expensive than this. To tell the truth, I am amazed at the functionality you can get for $200 dollars. I saw one of these things at Brookstone, and it just looks like it starts with a basic spiral pattern. It was demoed in the middle of the store, so I am not sure what happens when it gets to things like chair legs and such. Probably just senses them with the bump sensors, and shoots off on another direction.

    2. Re:Why is it... by pivo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seem to remember a european (Brittish?) version of this type of vac that was announced a long time ago here on /., if I remember correctly, it did what you're talking about. I agree, if I have to watch it, what's the point? (Of course, I'd watch it anyway, but I want it to be able to work by itself.)

    3. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      What I'm looking for is a robot that is about this size, but that is _always_ working (or returning to it's base to charge itself.

      It would have to be fairly quiet, but wouldn't have to be too smart. It could wander at random, and the only path that it would need to remember is how to get back to the charger. (it would still need cliff detection)

      The only control that it would need would be response to the command "Go away."

    4. Re:Why is it... by worthb · · Score: 5, Funny
      I want my vacuuming to be sort of like setting up a maintainance cron job to run at 3 AM.


      I don't know about you but if that thing started running in my house at 3 AM it would end up out the window.
      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
    5. Re:Why is it... by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For $200, I'd say that the trouble to plug it in each night, pull it out in the morning and press a button is fine. Assuming I don't buy one beforehand this is definetly on my christmas list.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    6. Re:Why is it... by mbourgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It doesn't actually remember the room. It uses a variation on the wandering drunk pattern, but the practical upshot is it should finish in a couple of hours. Part of why it's so cheap - it doesn't have to "learn the room", you just put it down and walk away. From what I've read on it, the price point is paramount... for $200, I'm damn tempted.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    7. Re:Why is it... by DrBlake · · Score: 5, Informative

      Electrolux of Sweden has a machine called Trilobyte that can recharge it self. See http://www.trilobite.electrolux.se/ . It is much more expensive though.

    8. Re:Why is it... by rgremill · · Score: 1

      Recently there was an article about a metal plate used to charge batteries. You simply laid your cellphone or pda or whatever on the plate and it recharged. I don't see why there couldn't be a metal plate on the ground. The vaccuum cleaner rolls on top of it and is able to recharge.

    9. Re:Why is it... by Jon+Chatow · · Score: 2

      ISTR it was made by Electrolux, who are, I think, an Anglo-Sweedish consumer electronics conglomerate. This was ~ '97, so the term "first intelligent 'floor vac'" seems to jar a little, but hey...

      --
      James F.
    10. Re:Why is it... by kris0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Assuming docking itself can be easily done, it's really 'remembering' a room, or even just a path to get back to the docking station, that is the hard part.

      Consider the small number of sensors on this thing. If I remember correctly it has just a few IR sensors (used for following walls, etc). Mapbuilding in general requires a little more than that, and is also VERY computationally and memory intensive (for more information you might want to read about the most common method for mapbuilding, evidence grids).

      Even if you were just to attempt to remember a) the location of your docking station and b) your own location, after half an hour of vacuuming (especially on carpet) and bumping into things, the odometry error that will have accumulated is tremendous -- you'd have no hope of knowing your actual location relative to the docking station. Normally a number of localization methods are used to combat odometry error (most commonly, Kalman filtering). However, they all require lots of sensory input and processing.

      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

    11. Re:Why is it... by CvD · · Score: 2, Informative
      I remember Dyson had a prototype a couple years back, but I can't find it anywhere on their website. Google still remembers, though:



      Cheers,

      Costyn.
    12. Re:Why is it... by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So, if you want a robot that can plug itself back in (at least, one that can do so by remembering where it's docking station is), be prepared to spend a lot more than $200.

      Well, let's think different.

      We don't need a combat system here -- we're talking about one room. How about putting a blinking IR light on the docking station and a IR detector on the vacuum unit? Then program the vacuum to roll around until it "sees" the dock...

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    13. Re:Why is it... by ehiris · · Score: 2

      Somebody please port Linux to it or mount an XBOX on top of it and hook to its movement controls.

    14. Re:Why is it... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      That my Aibo can plug itself back in, but this thing can't?

      If you fall asleep on the couch, and it's plug-finding mechanism screws up, I don't even want to think about all the orifices it might try.

    15. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It starts out in a spiral, then when it hits the wall it goes into a "wall follow" mode. It actually has a sensor just for this. It will keep following the wall for a while, even tracking around things like bookcases. Eventually it gives up on that and does a bouncing ball kind of cross hatch mode where it turns 90 deg every time it hits something. Then it will sometimes spontaneously go back into spiral mode.

  8. Runaway by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the first link in a chain of events that will eventually have Gene Simmons chasing me across a skyscraper with a swarm of robotic spiders!

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Runaway by Agave · · Score: 1

      better than richard simmons chasing you across the lawn followed by dogs that shoot bees out of their mouth :)

    2. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the quote right, dipshit

    3. Re:Runaway by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

      Actually the first robot that Tom Selleck was called in to get was a floor vacuum/house cleaning robot.
      It got hold of a shotgun.
      Not good.

    4. Re:Runaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. IIRC, the first robot in that movie was an agricultural bot that had gone mad, and was tearing up the crops. Later in the movie there was a housebot that got hold of a .357 (not a shotgun).

      Yeah, I've seen the movie a few times.

  9. Maybe I'll get one of these things so I can... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 5, Funny

    sit back and chat on my video phone.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
    1. Re:Maybe I'll get one of these things so I can... by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 1

      Will this thing be able to clean out my flying car?

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
  10. Wife by milesbparty · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If I got this, then what would I use my wife for? Oh yeah, I guess there's still cooking...

    --
    eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
    1. Re:Wife by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 1

      What about port "probing" ?
      Sorry you said "wife" not girlfriend.

    2. Re:Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Error:

      The Slashdot comment system has detected that your post contains a claim that you have a wife. This is impossible, as no Slashdot reader has even had a girlfriend, yet alone a wife. Therefore your comment has been automatically modded as -5 troll.

    3. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Apparently you are a lonely sole.

      Here is proof that we get married.

    4. Re:Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that's one of the Slashdot staff - they don't count! I'm talking about ordinary posters!

    5. Re:Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      uh-huh-huh-huh.
      he's a fish.
      huh-huh huh.

      </butt-head>

      Lameness filter encountered.
      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

    6. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Well as Triumph the insult comic dog would say:

      "You'll die alone!!!"

    7. Re:Wife by matthewn · · Score: 1
      Ha. You just called milesbparty a lonely fish. Or perhaps the bottom of a shoe. I know not which.

      Let's get literate: sole ... soul

    8. Re:Wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess - you married her so that she'd give you the commission for all of her shopping at Amazon?

    9. Re:Wife by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Did I refer you to this book yet DJFirBee?

    10. Re:Wife by spood · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. The rest of us still have plenty of uses for your wife...

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
  11. How well does it really work by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

    I watched the flash animation for about 5 minutes the other day, and the darn thing STILL didn't get all the little pieces of crud.

    I hope the ai programmer on the robot is better than the flash animator.

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    1. Re:How well does it really work by j0e_average · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      01101001 01101110 01100100 01100101 01100101 01100100

    2. Re:How well does it really work by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 1

      01110011 01110111 01100101 01100101 01110100 00100001 00000000

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  12. This article sucks by dkone · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... I know it is a stupid post

  13. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey! It's R2-D2's cousin: SUX-2BU.

    Okay, dumb joke, but it beats the inevitable "That robot sucks!" jokes.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here's something that sucks: Why does that techreview.com link have an https URL?

      Moz complains about my PSM being missing, and I don't have the permissions to install it on this box.

    2. Re:Heh.. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      The old joke about having sex with a vacuum cleaner.

      Nothing sucks like Electrolux.



      Associated Press report of May 13, 1998:

      Man's penis severed by vacuum cleaner

      LONG BRANCH, N.J.: A 51-year-old man seeking sexual gratification with a vacuum cleaner nearly bled to death when the machine cut off a half-inch of his penis, authorities said.

      The intoxicated man first told police that someone had stabbed him in the crotch as he slept, Long Branch public safety director Louis Napoletano said.

      However, officers who responded to Monday's call for help instead realized the man had hoped to obtain sexual pleasure from the appliance's suction, Napoletano said.

      "But what he didn't realize is that there's a blade in the vacuum cleaner right under where the hose attaches that pushes the dust into the collection bag," he said.

      When the man, who was not identified by police, turned on the vacuum cleaner, the blade cut off part of his penis. The victim told detectives he did not remember the incident.

      Doctors at Monmouth Medical Center were able to stop the bleeding but were unable to reattach the severed part, Napoletano said. He was listed in stable condition Tuesday.

    3. Re:Heh.. by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Nothing sucks like Electrolux.

      In England the slogan is "Nothing sucks like a Vax." Makes for some amusing VMS jokes.

    4. Re:Heh.. by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 0, Troll
      I hope they use a Windows CE OS embedded in this thing... That would drastically increase the suckage of this vacuum cleaner

      The only Microsoft will ever produce a product that doesn't suck is if they get into the Vacuum Cleaner bussiness

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    5. Re:Heh.. by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

      i think the scariest part of that story is that you have a copy ready for posting all the way back from 1998

    6. Re:Heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin award winner.

  14. Goal by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know the dot-bomb is rebounding when an MIT startups goal is to suck.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  15. IMAGINE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A Clawhammer Cluster Of These !!!

  16. hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 5, Funny

    .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by egg+troll · · Score: 4, Funny
      .... why 65% of americas youth are overweight.


      Because the research was based on a Slashdot poll! I mean have you seen Cowboy Neal?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    2. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 1

      WANT TO BUY ILLEGAL DRUGS ONLINE?
      Maybe it has something to do with sitting at home playing a drug dealer online instead of being an old fashioned dealer that stands on the street corner and has to run from the police on occasion.

    3. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      MCM... do i know you from racine?

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    4. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by MCMLXXVI · · Score: 1

      The city with the most drug dealing per capita in the midwest?

    5. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by edrugtrader · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      indeed, thats the city.

      what have you been up to? email to mike@kristopeit.com or aol IM "edrugtrader"

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    6. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by Jacer · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Cowboy Neal Counts as 65% of America

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    7. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Cowboy Neal Counts as 65% of America

      Only by volume.

    8. Re:hopefully the researchers will figure out.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Because of the food pyramid. (NYT, free registration et fucking cetera)

      Now you know.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Beasties by anicklin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't imagine how clean it will get a room when the dogs and cats are chasing after it and knocking them around. Maybe you have to up the room size in order to compensate.

    Then again, a $200 interactive cat toy might be a good thing, if they never get tired of it like every other one they get. :-)

    1. Re:Beasties by profesor · · Score: 1

      Mine does a pretty good job when being chased around by 2 cocker spaniels and a toy poodle :) The dogs don't knock it around too much, but it does turn away from them when it hits them with the front bumper.

      Seriously, I got one for my birthday a week ago and it works very well - much better than I expected. I'm very surprised what it can do for $200. It's a very ingenious design. It's neat to watch it and see the subsumption architecture in action: "Oh look, it changed from spiraling behavior to wall following. Now it's just going straight then turning when it finds a wall."

  18. What about the corners? by beerman2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing looks pretty sweet. If it actually picks up dirt and can do an entire room without recharging/emptying then i want one of these babies. The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment.

    1. Re:What about the corners? by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only crappy thing is that it can't get the corners, which seems to be where all the dust accumulates, at least in my appartment

      I had the opportunity to listen to an explanation of a similar product made by a competitor.

      As you suggest, the robot does have a hard time reaching corners. However, when compared to a human operator, it was found that most people miss large patches when they do their vacuuming. It is just hard to remember exactly what areas have been covered (that and the constant urge of doing something more interesting). All in all, it was found that the robot covered a larger fraction of the floor, even if it did not reach all the corners.

      Tor

    2. Re:What about the corners? by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but if I have to do the vacuuming, I usually wait until the last minute and I can DEFINITELY tell where the vacuum has been and where it has not just by looking at the newly created swath of carpet that is now free whatever shit had collected there over the last few months.

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
  19. Wonder how the cats are going to react to this? by Chastitina · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe it's dog-friendly, but at 7.5 pounds how is it going to hold up to the teething Labrador next door?

    Sounds like a lot of fun for when the cats misbehave, though.

    "Here kitty kitty kitty..."

  20. Good idea, but... by mrgrey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Roomba's walk isn't guaranteed to cover an entire floor, but in practice it does a very good job.

    So you only get the floor mostly clean. Seems like it could use some more work...

    --
    -Tolerate my intolerance
    1. Re:Good idea, but... by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I usually only get the floor mostly clean when I manually run the vacuum. Part of it is laziness, part is... well... okay, it's all laziness.

      Maybe I could use some more work. I know my wife thinks so :)

      --
      My sig sucks.
    2. Re:Good idea, but... by huh_ · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you only get the floor mostly clean. Seems like it could use some more work...

      Well, to me, mostly clean is much better than the horrible mess I have now.
      You can eat off my floors, but not because they are that sanitary, but because they have all that food on them.

  21. corners by trollercoaster · · Score: 1

    I've heard, that while these things work well, they have problems getting into the corners. Nice use of technology, though.

    --

    Slashdot, come for the goatse, stay for the trolls.

  22. Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually my wife has one. It is worth every penny. I also have a robo-mow robotic lawnmower (made by Friendly Robotics) to take care-o-th-lawn. I think I paid about $300 for it. The vaccuuming is no biggie to me (since I usually never did it anyway), but the robomower has paid for itself many times over in the time I have saved. $500 total spent. Hundreds of hours saved already. That's pretty darn good ROI if you ask me. Of course for those who don't make a point of exercising, the robomow may be a death ticket.

    1. Re:Have one! Works great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever got the vacuuming robot and the lawnmowing robot mixed up?

      Ever wondered how your shag pile carpet turned in to a very thin carpet overnight? :-)

    2. Re:Have one! Works great! by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      Hundreds of hours saved already.

      How many acres are you living on anyway?

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    3. Re:Have one! Works great! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Less than half an acre, since that's all the robomower is designed for.

      If, however, he bought it a couple years ago I might buy a hundred hours saved.

      Looked at one of the robotic mowers a few months ago, but they only work well if you have a single contiguous area of lawn, with no narrow sections. I have three separate lawn areas, which would require buying two additional power stations and manually moving the robomower between each section. No thanks.

    4. Re:Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 2, Informative

      Untrue. I have my yard divided into 3 sections. All it requires is putting a wire around each section and moveing the transmitter to the section you want to mow (sufficient wire and extra connectors are included with the mower kit). I mow 1 section per day once a week. Takes about two minutes to hook up the transmitter and start the mower. I come home and it's done.

    5. Re:Have one! Works great! by GMontag · · Score: 2

      If you put them in the garage together do they fight like hell until one is dismembered?

      I think I saw a documentry on these things on an educational cable channel, like Comedy Central or TNN.

    6. Re:Have one! Works great! by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      "Takes about two minutes to hook up the transmitter and start the mower. I come home and it's done."

      Or more realistically, it takes two minutes to hook up the transmitter and start the mower, and when I come home the lawn is half done and the mower has been stolen.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    7. Re:Have one! Works great! by GooberToo · · Score: 2

      Ever concerned that it will be stolen while you are away?

    8. Re:Have one! Works great! by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Nope. My wife is a SaH mom and I live on a cul-de-sac. With the neighbors I have (who all envy my mower) I could probably get the license plate of every car that comes by during the day. Well, my 110lb. Rott helps too. ;)

    9. Re:Have one! Works great! by OffTheRack · · Score: 1

      robotic lawnmower (made by Friendly Robotics) to take care-o-th-lawn. I think I paid about $300

      A guy in my townhome community has one (made by Toro?). These are small lawns and I see that thing crawling around all the time. Something of an eyesore really.

      The big question ... when are bad people going to realize they can just grab them off lawns and walk away?

    10. Re:Have one! Works great! by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Later than soon, I imagine. If anyone has, I imagine that they soon realized that they can't seem to get it recharged...

      Kind of like stealing an electric car. I wonder how many of those ever get carjacked?

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    11. Re:Have one! Works great! by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Actually, I thought I read that one of these robot mowers had a built in alarm system. If it strays too far outside the perimeter you set up by planting stakes in the ground - it sounds a loud alarm - deterring theft.

  23. Geek won't be Saved Until.. wait.!.what floor!!??? by buswolley · · Score: 1
    The Geek won't be saved until it pick up laundry, recycle Dew bottles and pizza boxes.

    Sometimes, I don't see my floor for weeks.

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  24. combine this with photovores and ... by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a similar idea to this (and probably millions of other people did too) but I thought it would be cool to have the thing solar powered. It would seek out a spot of sunshine and recharge for a while, then clean until it got almost dead, then seek out light again. it would not be able to sweep for long on any given charge, but you could put it in a room and let it just go on and on. maybe it could alert you if it got stuck or if it was in need of a new bag.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
    1. Re:combine this with photovores and ... by condour75 · · Score: 1

      I think "combine this with photovores" should be henceforth be considered the robotics equivalent of "imagine a beowulf cluster"

  25. The Fools! by foistboinder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't they realize the danger?


    According to Professor Frink:

    Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.
    1. Re:The Fools! by sapped · · Score: 1

      Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.

      Right, and in steps Roomba to clean up the mess! You have just created the perfect marketing strategy for these guys!

    2. Re:The Fools! by Zelet · · Score: 2

      You forgot to add "froinlaven!"

      Where is a slashdot editor when you need one. Taco, can you spell check "froinlaven" for me please?

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    3. Re:The Fools! by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Theme park owner: "Well how long do we have?"

      Professor Frink: "According to my calculations, the robots will not turn on us for at least 72 hours."

      [Robot sits up on the table and starts to choke a scientist.]

      Professor Frink: "Oh, forgot to carry the Y."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    4. Re:The Fools! by foistboinder · · Score: 2

      Right, and in steps Roomba to clean up the mess! You have just created the perfect marketing strategy for these guys!

      Maybe I can get a job in Microsoft's marketing department (Shudderrrr!).

    5. Re:The Fools! by Santos+L.+Halper · · Score: 1

      Then again, Frink created a large robot that tried to sell itself off at his garage sale, to which Frink told him, "Scrubbing is what you were designed for, and scrubbing is what you shall do."

      --

      "Ask not for whom the bone bones. It bones for thee." --Bender
    6. Re:The Fools! by miTTio · · Score: 2, Funny
      Elementary chaos theory tells us that all robots will eventually turn against their masters and run amok, in an orgy of blood and the kicking and the biting with the metal teeth and the hurting and shoving.


      Do you have Old Glory Robot Insurance?
    7. Re:The Fools! by Chairboy · · Score: 2

      and the Glaven!

    8. Re:The Fools! by stor · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that you're perfectly safe unless lightning strikes your (unmonitored of course) robot and it miraculously springs to life.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  26. Family Test - LEGOS! by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love how they never test these in a real American Familys house. This thing wouldnt last a day around my kids.

    Legos, flash cards, marbles, mcdonalds toys, stuffed animals with fluffy parts, video games and controllers, dirty clothes.

    Now give me a robot that washs and folds clothes, and picks up kids toys, and I can use a Roomba. (And no Honey, you are not a Robot.)

    1. Re:Family Test - LEGOS! by Maechtig · · Score: 1

      I guess the inventors had to start someplace. I wanted one until I saw that its dust-collection bin is smaller than two cans of Spam. It quickly would choke on the hair my 2 dogs donate to the floors each day. Let's hope Moore's Law will extend to this bot: more capacity, better smarts, lower price.

      --
      Gee, it's so tough to find a place to park around here!
  27. That's bullshit.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    $200 ?!
    I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:That's bullshit.. by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

      $200 ?!

      I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.


      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      --

      C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    2. Re:That's bullshit.. by grub · · Score: 1


      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      Does the vacuum come with an assortment of different coloured wigs?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:That's bullshit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it sucks like nobody's business. Wow.

    4. Re:That's bullshit.. by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2

      I paid $6,000 (US) for my RealDoll and it can't move at all, let alone vacuum the floor.

      If you bought your RealDoll expecting it to vacuum the floor the sales rep must have been absolutely amazing!

      --

      As with the sun's light
      My mom was magnificent
      Unquestionable
    5. Re:That's bullshit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sides have valid points. The parent and grandparent represent one of the insighftul discussions I've ever seen on slashdot.

      Bravo, fellow ACs.

    6. Re:That's bullshit.. by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      But the vacuum doesn't have lifelike silicone breasts and three orifices.

    7. Re:That's bullshit.. by huntz0r · · Score: 1

      Fucking, no... but it sucks like a Hoover!

      Probably because it is a Hoover.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
    8. Re:That's bullshit.. by Elentar · · Score: 1

      Yes, but unlike a RealDoll or any porn star I've heard of, it sucks, blows, *and* cleans the rug all at the same time.

      All while wearing a rubber hose. Kinky.

      -Elentar

      --
      The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    9. Re:That's bullshit.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      But have you tried fucking the vacuum?

      Yeah, then he ended up buying it a wig and a name placard which reads "daddy's little shop-vac".

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:That's bullshit.. by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      for more on sex with vacuum cleaners, the always entertaining, always factual Cecil Adams.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
  28. Pre-Vacuum Pick-up by CutterDeke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've got kids. Will Roomba do the pre-vacuum pick-up of all the Legos, money, etc.?

    My wife does a lot of sewing. How well can Roomba handle lots of thread on the floor? How about pins?

    The problem isn't the vacuuming. It's the picking up that you have to do before you can vacuum.

    1. Re:Pre-Vacuum Pick-up by ilias · · Score: 1
      Will Roomba do the pre-vacuum pick-up of all the Legos, money, etc.?

      It can probably push the legos and toys out of its way... As for the money, I'll come and pick it up for you :-)

    2. Re:Pre-Vacuum Pick-up by arantius · · Score: 1

      For you perhaps. But as a warning, go get checked by your doctor for the dreaded I'm-the-only-person-in-the-world disease. Some people don't have kids and don't make terrible messes of their floors. Animal hair, general dust, and such can still collect on a floor and need simple vaccuming.

      And give them a break, it's a nice step in an emerging field. :)

      --
      Health is simply dying at the slowest rate possible.
  29. Step one by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    But first something has to clean up all the socks, underwear, pizza boxes, AOL disks, rejection notices, bannana peels, etc. that are all over the floor. This is the hard part.

    1. Re:Step one by GypC · · Score: 2

      Yes, we need a robot to handle that part of the job as well. I propose; the Slob-O-Matic 3000!

    2. Re:Step one by dzym · · Score: 2
      The missing step #2 has been found!

      1) clean up all socks, underwear, pizza boxes, AOL disks, rejection notices, banana peels, etc.
      2) vacuum
      3) Profit!

    3. Re:Step one by koreth · · Score: 2

      No problem, just sit one of these down at the controls of one of these and you're all set. It'll even clear away the floor if you want the room really clean.

    4. Re:Step one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny loLOlOlOlOLoLoLOlololOlololOLOlolOloLoloLOlOLololO loLOLoLololoLOloloLolOLOloLOLOlOLoLOLOLolOLoLoLOlo LoLOlOLOLolOLOLoLOlOLOLOloLOLoLoLoLolOLOLoLoLoLOLo LoLoloLOlOLololololOLoLOloLOlOLOlOLOlOlolOloLOlOlO LolOLOLoLolOlOlolololOLoLolOlOLoLoloLoLOLOloloLOLO LoLoloLOLOLololoLoloLOLoloLoLolOlOLOLolOloloLoLoLO lololOLOLoloLolOLoLOloLOloLolololOloloLoLoLOLOloLo lolOloLoLOlolololOLoLOLOlOLolololOlOLOloloLoLoloLO LolololoLOLolOLoloLOLoLololOLolOlOLolOlOlololOLOLO lOloLoloLOLOLoLOlOloLolOlolOlOLOLOLOLoLoLolOlOlolO loLoloLOLoloLolOlOLoLoLOLololOlOLOLoLoLoLolOlOlOlo lOLoLOlololoLolOLOLOLolOlOloloLoLOloLOLoLOLoLOlOLO LOLoloLololoLOlololoLolOLOloLoLOLoloLoloLOLOlololo lolOLOloLOlOloLOLoLoLOloLOlOLoLoLOLOLOLOlOlOLoLolO LOloLoloLolOlolOLOlOLololoLOlOloLolOlOLolOLoLoLolO lOLoLoloLoLolOlOloLoLolOLoLoLOLOLoLoLolOLOlolOLoLO lOLolOlOlOlOlOlOLOLoloLolOLOLOLOLOLOLoLoLolOlOlOlO LOLoLOlOLoloLOloLoLOLoLOLoLoLOLolOlolOLoLolOlOLolO LOLOlOloLoLolOlOLoLoLOlOLOLolOloLololOloLoLolOlOlO LOLolOLOLOLOlOlOloloLOLoLOLOLOlolOLOLoLOLOloloLOLO LOloLOloloLoLolololOlolOlolOLOLoLoloLoloLoLOLOLolO loloLolOLOlOLOLoloLOlOloLOlolOLoLoloLoLoLOLoL!!!!! !!!111

  30. Forgot about robot cartoons by qurob · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    What about the robot cartoons from the 80's?

    Voltron
    GoBots
    Transformers
    Robotech
    Macross
    Orbots

    Then later you had UltraMan...

    Anyone else?

    1. Re:Forgot about robot cartoons by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      Then later you had UltraMan...
      Whadda mean, "later"? I was watching Ultraman fight giant rubbery monsters long before Voltron, etc. came along.
      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Forgot about robot cartoons by GMontag · · Score: 2

      What about Tobor the 8 Man that I used to watch on the Ray Rayner Show when I was a kid? He was cutting edge "Japan invading the cartoon industry" stuffn and he could do anything!

  31. I wonder .... by Tensor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How noisy it is ... all the article says is at a pretty low noise level.

    Pretty low noise for what ? a vaccum cleaner ? cos even a low noise one is noisy as hell.

    This looks like a ripoff of Husqvarna's automatic lawnmower. Only they have a 100% unattended one, as one model is solar powered !! http://www.automower.com/

  32. Robot mowers can be found here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://international.husqvarna.com/Folder_263/node 703.asp

    One is solar powered

  33. Don't vacuum that assignment! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure about other geeks but personally I use my floor as "storage space". I have very few holes where I can still see the floor that I use to move around (a bit like jumping from stone to stone to cross a river).

  34. Lazy by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2

    OK, so we were already moving to a point where we wouldn't have to leave the house to do most daily tasks. That was bad enough. But with inventions like this we won't have to walk around the house either.

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  35. As soon as version .1 comes out by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2

    that recharges itself, and dumps its own lint pan, ill probably get one. 150 bucks to never vaccum again?!? Ill go for it.
    Now, when it can sort my laundry on my floor by sniff check, ill buy 2 of em.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  36. I read a review of the roomba by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Informative

    in a local paper. It said that the Roomba couldn't completely replace your standard vacumm. It doesn't do stairs, and it has no attachments for things like furniture upholstery, etc. The article basically said it was good if you lived in a small place such as an apartment or didn't have kids, but if you need to do heavy duty cleaning, the 'bot wasn't gonna repalce your standard vac.

    --
    Why not fork?
  37. heh by papasui · · Score: 1, Funny

    Johnny 5 IS ALIVE!

  38. Here's another! by qurob · · Score: 1
  39. Nit-pick by Overt+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    from the to-lazy-to-stand dept.

    And, apparently, from the too-lazy-to-spell department, too...

  40. Pervert! by slagdogg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also took Roomba home with me to see how it would do in a somewhat more sedate setting. Once again, Roomba did its thing with a minimum of noise or fuss.

    Hmmm ... I don't see any mention of what exactly "its thing" was ... ewww.

    --
    (Score:-1, Wrong)
  41. https? by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Is it really necessary for us to slashdot their SSL server? I mean, if we're going to trash it, can't we at least do the lesser of the two and go with good ol' HTTP? (-:

    (not to mention the mismatched host and cert)

    S

  42. Floor VAX? by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it running on DEC hardware?

    1. Re:Floor VAX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow VAX jokes are so topical and with-it...

  43. It's too slow by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The CEO interviewed says a 10x12 room takes 1/2 an hour to vaccuum. I can vaccuum my entire 1000 square foot apartment in about 3 minutes. It's just not that difficult. Id rather do it myself and be done in less than 5 minutes, than hear that thing's motor whirring and whining for 3 hours while it cleans every room in my house.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:It's too slow by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2

      Who cares how long it takes if you're not home?

    2. Re:It's too slow by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the manufacturer figures you are going to leave your house at some point or another.

      silly manufacturer

      :P

    3. Re:It's too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quiet, Sheldon.

    4. Re:It's too slow by 3-22 · · Score: 0

      But with a tiny lint trap, it sounds like you have to be around to baby sit the damn thing.

    5. Re:It's too slow by tid242 · · Score: 2
      I think the manufacturer figures you are going to leave your house at some point or another.

      Hmmm... they must not have computers where they're from...

      -tid242

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    6. Re:It's too slow by Proc6 · · Score: 1

      Yea, that's what I want, to leave that thing alone with all my Cat5 strewn across the floor.

      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    7. Re:It's too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So keep a cleaner house before you get one, fuckless.

    8. Re:It's too slow by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      One of the biggest reasons people seem to like Roomba is its ability to easily go all the way under beds, tables, and the like and vacuum underneath them.

      Sure, you can vacuum an apartment in only minutes, but do you really bother to switch to the crevice tool and make sure you get everything under your bed, etc.? (Probably not, if you're like most people.)

      I do agree though... it's one of those "gee whiz" things that initially sounds teriffic, but I bet most owners quit using it after the first year or so. The small lint tray instead of a decent-capacity bag, the rechargeable battery which will no-doubt quit holding a charge after a year or so of use, and the fact it can't do any stairs (the part people hate vacuuming the most!) means it's not quite as useful as it first appears.

  44. Real man's challenge by shrikel · · Score: 5, Funny
    I can see it now:

    Geeks now have a vacuum cleaner web server!

    First one to run apache/linux on it wins.

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    1. Re:Real man's challenge by forsetti · · Score: 1

      My money is on NetBSD .... but then again, I'm still waiting to run NetBSD on my toaster....

      --
      10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
    2. Re:Real man's challenge by The+J+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing...
      Imagine a whole beow...

      */me tears like heck to save skin*

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:Real man's challenge by einTier · · Score: 2
      You know, if you mounted a web camera to it, and allowed remote driving of the robot, that might actually be interesting.


      "You looked a little distracted in that meeting today, Bob... what were you doing?"

      "oh, just vacuuming my floors... chasing the cats... that sort of thing."

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    4. Re:Real man's challenge by Restil · · Score: 2

      I'll get on that right away. :)

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    5. Re:Real man's challenge by Keepiru · · Score: 1

      There is a better device for annoying the cat from work:

      http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/fun-stuff/5776.sh tm l

  45. Another new robot... by name_already_in_use · · Score: 1

    There is also a new house robot just released in Japan for around the same sort of price. Whilst it doesn't vacuum the floor it does walk around, leave messages for other house guests, bring you things and show your e-mail on TV whenever you tell it to.
    I forget the name but it was on Tech TV I think, and was a cute little thing.

    --


    Rake Free + Mac Poker: CardCrusade
  46. Re: Really a Electrolux ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ehh... Is U.S. of A. really trailing behind?

    Vacuum-cleaner stores are selling much prettier versions of these puppies in Europe right now -- this version even has a LCD:

    http://www.trilobite.electrolux.se/

    Really begging for a slew of Beowulf Cluster jokes?

    AK

  47. come on now by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My rugs are vacuumed everyday before I get home...That is why one gets married isn't it?

    1. Re:come on now by SuicidalSquirrel · · Score: 1

      I know that's why I married my husband :)

      --
      So what are you going to do? Bleed on me?
    2. Re:come on now by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

      Blah blah blah joke!!

      Now moderate me up so that idiots can buy stuff from amazon with my user ID so that I can make money. Because I, RedWolves2 am a bidnisman!!

      You are a loser. LOOOOOSSSSSSSSSERRRRRRR.
      Dork. I bet you are an annoying Amway loser too.

    3. Re:come on now by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Oh god no! I hate that pyramid shit.

      I take it you haven't read this book yet!

  48. more realistic reviews at epinions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.epinions.com/Roomba_Intelligent_Sweeper _Vac_Vacuum_Cleaners/display_~reviews

  49. Not for me... by blanktek · · Score: 1

    My vacuum has HEPA filtration, bagless storage, and can suck a tennis ball through a garden hose which gives it the ability to really get dirt out of my carpet. I can FEEL a difference from old vacuums because less dust equals less sneezing.

    I doubt these manufacturers accounted for this type of quality when designing this gadget. Maybe scooting around the carpet pushes the dirt around a bit but I'll bet you if I bought this flimsy frisbee looking toy I would take it back the next day.

  50. That's better than a kid by Ghoser777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's very difficult to get an algorithm to cover oddly defined spaces, especially when there's objects (aka furniture) in the way. Should the robot move the furniture? What if a piece of furniture has a clearance that is below the robot's ability to vacuum under?

    Now that I think abou it, the robot probably only vacuums area that it can physically move over, so after a couple months, Fibonaccinumbers come into play and you'll have a dust bunny population explosion. But that's about the same amount of area any kid will vacuum, except that kids will probably skip any areas that don't look dirty (even if they really are).

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  51. Not the first, and not the coolest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electrolux has one, named the Trilobite.
    It is more advanced, can do stuff like plugging in automatically and resuming where it left off - plus it looks really cool!
    Only drawback is the price, 1500 euros, around 1500 US $, I think.

    More at Electrolux

  52. So exactly how... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    Do I install these on the Clawhammer motherboard?

  53. Hidden commands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have hidden commands like the R2D2 robot? Maybe it actually has washing-up and ironing capabilities in it's firmware, but they are disabled because they are only in Beta stages.

    Maybe if you burn a new EPROM on a Linux machine, and plug it in, maybe it'll wash up as well. Who knows!?

    1. Re:Hidden commands? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      "Help me Obi-Wan, you're my only hope!"

      "Play that again!"

      "Woop-Weep, Pooooo..."

  54. The First? by frause · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about Electrolux Trilobite?
    Electrolux claims they were first! Trilobite Pressrelease

  55. I have 2 100lb dogs by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    They would kick this things ass. I think a robo-mower would have a chance of winning though.

  56. I wonder what would happen if... by suman28 · · Score: 1

    I certainly hope the AI programmers on that robo-vacumn cleaner did a good job. I sure would like to see what it would do if I left the basement door open and turned it on. Ohhhh. Watch out for the first step. It's a loo loo!

    1. Re:I wonder what would happen if... by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 2

      actually, it has a built in cliff sensor to prevent it from commiting suicide like that :)

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
  57. Asimov would have loved the company name... by douglips · · Score: 2, Funny
  58. My dogs will destroy it... by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    Though, I'm not sure if it will be with their teeth or the sheer amount of dog hair. I vaccuum once a week and empty my upright three times, once for each floor. I don't see how that tiny thing could possibly hold up against any single room in my house.

  59. I'm just waiting.... by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny
    for someone to say that this is too expensive and that he built the EXACT same thing with a 486/25, and ATi AIW video card, wireless networking, and an old 15" monitor he had in the garage.


    And just a little script in Perl.

    1. Re:I'm just waiting.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is way too expensive - I've built one using a 486/25, an old ATI video card, a Bluetooth adaptor, and a spare 15" monitor I had in the garage.

      Oh, and it runs Linux as well.

  60. Another Vacuum story? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Slashdot: News for Nerds. Things that Suck.

    (doan hit me ;)

  61. This is Rodney Brooks' company. by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those robot geeks among us who did NOT know, this is Rodney Brooks' company.

    Rodney A. Brooks is Director of the 230 person MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and is the Fujitsu Professor of Computer Science. He is also Chairman and Chief Technical Officer of iRobot Corp (Roomba)

    He received degrees in pure mathematics from the Flinders University of South Australia and the Ph.D. in Computer Science from Stanford University in 1981.

    This guy is to robot-geeks what RMS is to Open-Source.

    1. Re:This is Rodney Brooks' company. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "This guy is to robot-geeks what RMS is to Open-Source."

      Annoying?

  62. not terribly useful by WhiteChocolate42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, one of these would only come in handy if I actually vacuumed in the first place. Now, make me a robot that posts to slashdot, drinks mountain dew and takes naps, and you've got yourself a customer! Laser eye-beams probably wouldn't hurt either. http://www.geocities.com/robot_president/quotes.ht ml

  63. I have to admit by JanneM · · Score: 1

    I want one. I _really_ want one. After moving a year and a half ago, I finally threw out my old vacuum cleaner and have never bought a new one, relying on a broom instead. And though I know a vacuum cleaner is easier to use than a broom, I've balked at buying another noisy, clumsy appliance that only reminds me of yet another unpleasant chore. This unit is in the same price range as a normal vacuum cleaner and will do the job without me having to be there.

    Only thing I wonder now is when it'll be available in Europe...

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  64. I have bought one, and it doesn't do the job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a cure toy, but it get stuck on my carpet,
    which is a pretty generic one.

    Doesn't do the job for me. I'm very disappointed.

  65. hardly the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    electrolux has had prototypes since 1997...

    see here

  66. Vaccum by Guipo · · Score: 0

    THAT SUCKS!

    --
    Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
  67. Except the batteries don't last long enough by SonicBurst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There was a blurb on the Roomba in this month's What's New section of PopSci. They quoted a battery time of 90 minutes, which to me seems like WAY more than enough time to vacuum. However, the blurb said that it can only do 2 10x20 rooms in that amount of time. Well, I don't know what everyone lives in, but it would take this thing all day to vacuum my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft, and I for one wouldn't want to hear a vacuum running all day. And I can't just let the thing run all day at work, since the batteries only last 90 min! Guess I'll be vacuuming the old way for some time to come still....

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    1. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And I can't just let the thing run all day at work, since the batteries only last 90 min! Guess I'll be vacuuming the old way for some time to come still....

      Let it loose in one room each day, then finish up the remaining rooms (if you have more than 5 rooms) on the weekend.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by jon+doh! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft,

      is that without kitchen sq footage? what about bathrooms? i know some homebuilders add in the garage to their sqft measurements, do you vacuum closets? pantry? the tiled entryway? i know some people vacuum anything, even if it isn't carpeted, but we only sweep the tiled parts of our apartment.

      probably not a whole lot knocked off there, and if you have enough furniture, i'm sure most people won't move the big heavy stuff to vacuum more than once or twice a year.

    3. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative
      You would hear it running all the time.

      They had one of these on demo at Brookstone in the local mall, and it made a hell of a racket.

      It sounded like a combo between a cheap motorized plastic toy and a hair dryer. I really hope for their sake the one I saw was busted somehow.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    4. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2

      And what happens if this thing grabs a hold of an extension cord or antenna rotator wire or speaker wire that's too close to the floor or far from the wall? Does it just keep right on chugging until it has ripped your TV off the table or your monitor off your desk or your 100 lb speaker onto your cat and killed it (or a small child!) and done enough damage to cost you more than a maid would for 6 months? Not as dangerous as a robot lawnmower, I would expect, but dangerous enough. The prep for operating this thing must rival pre-washing dishes in sheer lunacy.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    5. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gee whiz then I would need two of these gadgets. Our house measures without the garage and closets about 3500 square feet. Actually that kind of sucks since the vacuum cleaner would be running constantly.

      My question though is what about the dog factor. I have English Bulldogs that consider vaccuum cleaners the enemy...

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    6. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah. Well MY house is 50,000 square feet. And my dick is longer than yours, too.

    7. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by rworne · · Score: 1
      It is nether strong enough nor heavy enough to do so. It seems to have the vacuum ability of a dustbuster, and a small rotating brush.

      Nowhere are there high-speed powerful motors and belts and other items that normally make these things dangerous to kids. The thing is only about 14 inches across. Think of it as a smart, autonomous RC vehicle with a dustbuster on the front that can rotate 180 degrees in place and looks like an oversized hockey puck. That's what it is. Far more impressive in print than in person.

      One application it would totally kick butt on is for those of us with wood floors. I just wish it were more quiet.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    8. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      ...but it would take this thing all day to vacuum my house which measures in at about 2000 sq. ft,

      So, if you've got a nice big house you've got the bucks to buy several of them, and the invisible walls to keep them out of each others' territory. Of course when you come home there's these hubcaps scattered all over your house, but hey, the rest is pretty clean!

    9. Re:Except the batteries don't last long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've used one for a couple of weeks and it works perfectly. I cannot understand how people who have no experience with the Roomba can sit around "explaining" how it works, what dangers it poses and other fiction. For one thing, it's no louder than any other vacuum cleaner. For another, it does a 2000 sq. ft. house in about 3-4 hours, so you just let it go about its business a couple of mornings, then wait a week or so and repeat. The point is: you don't need to be there when it cleans--and it really cleans very, very well.

  68. I don't understand the editors.... by mshiltonj · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I submitted this on the 4th -- two weeks ago.

    * 2002-10-04 10:34:46 Consumer Robot Vaccums Floor (articles,news) (rejected)

    Rejected when I submitted it, now it's on the home page.

    I know. Offtopic, -1. But still, you have to wonder.

    1. Re:I don't understand the editors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an awful low /. UID to be bitching about the story submission queue being unfair. Have you come over to the dark side?

  69. Another Bad Pun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this work? Well, there IS a sucker born every minute.

  70. filling your needs.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ok, we're working on rushing the Barbie pill through FDA approval. We should have it to market in three years.

    Prof. Pointexter J. Chemist
    Dupont "Better living through chemistry"

  71. Somebody else remembers Orbots?!? by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Orbots was one of my very first exposures to anime-- even before I ever saw Macross (Robotech), Voltron. My next exposure was a rather good Voltron-like anime OAV that had been edited and dubbed into english by Funimation called 'Voltus 5'. I always considered both Voltron series to be pale imitatons of that movie.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  72. Obligatory SP reference by dubiousmike · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Step One: Turn on Roomba
    Step Two: ???
    Step Three: Roomba takes off with my wife to the Bahamas.

    Damn Roomba. You are too smooth...

  73. What if by Tensor · · Score: 1

    Really nice :)

    As far as i could see the solar lawnmower i was talking about is not even for sale in the US, Only the mains rechargable is avail. Strange.

    And for large places, does this vaccum cleaner recharge on its own ? i mean, go recharge and the continue vaccuming ?

    It would be awesome to add a notebook mobo and a hard-drive (or mem stick, or SD card or ...) so it can map the house and steer itself back to the broom closet for recharging, and back to the room it was cleaning and so on.

    It wouldn't be THAT expensive really, a 486 mb will do. Running linux obviously.

    1. Re:What if by Comedian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, the Electrolux Trilobite actually recharges itself automatically. Check out the English press-kit.

      The technology they are using in the Trilobite to let it map out rooms is really cool: echo-location with ultrasound, just as bats do.

      As far as I know, it's so far only being sold in Sweden (since spring 2002) and Norway (since autumn 2002). I've read that Electrolux plans to start marketing it for other European countries in early 2003.

      The only down-side about this robo-cleaner is the price.. about 12000 kroner here in Norway, which is about USD $1500. (Ouch.)

      I've been drooling over this thing since it was released on the Swedish market, but it's way too expensive for me yet. Hopefully competing products will force Electrolux to lower the price.

  74. Flat Earth Myth by Red+Weasel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication.

    This story was invented by Washington Irving (yes the writer of The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and Other Stories) to show his contempt for the priesthood and for the conservative nature of the church and European nations. And guess what? It caught on and expanded to include everyone that lived before them.

    Lets all ignore the fact that every time there was an eclipse that the shadow was round or that sailors from around the world would loose site of land as they sailed or that a Greek mathematician calculated the circumference of the earth and was only 52 miles off.

    Jeffrey
    Burton Russell
    Has a very short piece but he says it best with

    "A round earth appears at least as early as the sixth century BC with Pythagoras, who was followed by Aristotle, Euclid, and Aristarchus, among others in observing that the earth was a sphere. Although there were a few dissenters--Leukippos and Demokritos for example--by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

    --
    ..which just shows that the human brain is ill-adapted for thinking and was probably designed for cooling the blood-T P
    1. Re:Flat Earth Myth by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      the romans and greeks knew many things that wasn't known in the middle ages though. Hardly proves your point.

    2. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication... by the time of Eratosthenes (3 c. BC), followed by Crates(2 c. BC), Strabo (3 c. BC), and Ptolemy (first c. AD), the sphericity of the earth was accepted by all educated Greeks and Romans."

      First off, Claudius Ptolemy lived in the second century, not the frst century.

      Second, Christianity is well known for destroying and suppressing knowledge. That's why they burned the library at Alexandria. Galileo was arraigned before the Catholic Inquisition and forced to recant his heretical view that the earth rotated, and also revolved around the sun. However, you are correct that the Greeks and Romans knew the Earth was round.

      My question is, when Columbus was ready to sail, did he sail from Greece, or did he sail from Spain, a country dominated by Catholicism?

      Read the Bible. The conception of the earth in Genesis 1 is that of a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. In addition, the Hebrews were influenced via the patriarchs by Mesopotamian concepts (due to their time in Egypt), and via Moses. Moses was, after all, "educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians" (Acts 7:22; Exod 2:10). It is highly probable, therefore, that the writer and first readers of Genesis 1 defined the sea in the same way that all people in the ancient Near East did, namely, as a single circular body of water in the middle of which the flat earth-disc floated and from which all wells, springs and rivers derived their water.'

      It therefore all the more historically probable that the writer and readers of Genesis 1 thought of the earth as a single continent in the shape of a flat circular disc. The belief was that the earth is covered by a vault and that celestial bodies move inside this firmament. This makes sense only under the assumption that the earth is flat. This is reinforced in Genesis 1:6 and 1:7, and was commonly depicted in religious art, through the 1400s.

      If second grade serves me, I believe Columbus sailed in 1492.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    3. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 2

      One more thing: Jeffery Burton Russel's paper, which you cite, was presented at a conference at Westmont College, which is a Christian College. If you read the entire thing, he also goes on to bash Darwin and the theory of evolution.

      Hardly a credible source.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    4. Re:Flat Earth Myth by LMariachi · · Score: 2
      Second, Christianity is well known for destroying and suppressing knowledge.

      No argument there, but evidence suggests that neither a Christian nor a Muslim (as is elsewhere alleged) was responsible for the burning of the library at Alexandria:

      http://www.bede.org.uk/library.htm
      http://www.ehistory.com/world/articles/ArticleView .cfm?AID=9
      http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandri a

    5. Re:Flat Earth Myth by pjp6259 · · Score: 1

      Lets all ignore the fact that every time there was an eclipse that the shadow was round
      The fact that an eclipse gives a round shadow only proves that the moon is round, which would already be obvious to anyone that had looked up at night.

      --
      Computers don't make mistakes. What they do, they do on purpose.
    6. Re:Flat Earth Myth by werfele · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you're suggesting that Columbus was radical in his belief that the world was round, that would be incorrect. His proposal to reach the East Indies by heading west was examined by the commission headed by Isabela's confessor, Hernando de Talavera, consisting of religious and scholarly leaders.

      Over the span of a couple of years, they decided to reject the plan because they concluded that Columbus had underestimated the distance, and that the actual distance was too far to be practical. They were correct on the first point, and wrong on the second only because of the unexpected presence of the Americas. Not even the religious leaders raised the idea the the plan would fail because the earth is flat. http://www2.worldbook.com/features/features.asp?fe ature=explorers&page=html/newworld_plan.html&direc t=yes

    7. Re:Flat Earth Myth by Keepiru · · Score: 1

      I think he meant a lunar eclipse, where the earth gets in between the sun and the moon, the shadow of the earth you see on the moon is round.

    8. Re:Flat Earth Myth by User+956 · · Score: 2

      If you're suggesting that Columbus was radical in his belief that the world was round, that would be incorrect.

      All I'm suggesting is that anyone who says "The whole idea that the entire world thought that the earth was flat until Columbus came around is a total and complete fabrication.", and then goes on to talk about how open minded the Church was, is making shit up.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  75. this is just the first step by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    Utopia will be when robots will produce everything with no supervision from a human...then all goods will be free, no one will have to work, and entertainmnet will be the most important thing in Human's lifes. though, the quality of education will fall and one day, no man or woman will know how to do anything that requires an education.......wow...bad side effects to Utopia.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  76. Re:What about the corners? - 1890s fix by victim · · Score: 2

    What you need are dust corners. These are little brass trianglish affairs to go in square corners and turn them into radiused corners. They made sweeping and scrubbing easier back when it was all hand powered.

  77. Scrubbing bubbles by ACNeal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get those scribbing bubbles by Dow.

    all the adds show them as autonomous. You just apply them to the bathroom surface, and they zoom around like they were at a 1970's skate park. According to the ads, they do a pretty good job to.

    I always wondered why they didn't use these as the basis for nano-technology.

  78. yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by mekkab · · Score: 2

    and my wife and I have been salivating over it since.

    no, it won't replace my regular vacuum, nor my vacuum with attachments, nor my steam vac, but periodically running it every couple of days to pick up all the kitty litter? PRICELESS.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by einTier · · Score: 2
      This is exactly why I want one. That and my 2000 sq ft of hardwood floors.


      I'm tired of sweeping the hardwoods every few days, and doing a doubly good job before I mop them, and I'm tired of all the kitty litter the cats track around, even if most of it is confined to laundry room.


      I don't expect to be freed from vacuuming forever, but if this means that instead of vacuuming the whole house every week and sweeping the hardwoods every few days, I can just hit the hardwoods just before mopping and the carpets once in a blue moon, it's worth every penny.


      I haven't purchased one yet, because I'm still a bit skeptical that it can actually get 90% of the floor under full automation -- but judging from the reviews, I'll have to get one soon.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    2. Re:yeah, WSJ had this weeks ago by mekkab · · Score: 2

      okay, so cat #3 is being hospitalized- projected damage is $700 (however likely to rise)(hyper calcimia... can lead to renal failure (if not caused by renal failure))
      BUT!@

      I'll let you know how to roomba is if I have any cash left over.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  79. Small height, goes under stuff by mekkab · · Score: 2

    it's REEEAAL short, so it can fit under most couches and things.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  80. Obligatory reference elucidator by laetus · · Score: 2


    The movie Runaway

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  81. Improvements. by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These guys should hire some programmers (and engineers) from The Robomower Company... The mower can handle a quarter acre with all kinds of obstructions...

    Also on my wishlist:
    1. Return-to-base self-charging.
    2. Return-to-base dust bin emtpying.
    3. Environment learning. It could develop a map of the floor, and keep track of the dirt collected in different areas. Then it could do a daily cleaning of the high-traffic areas, and do occasional full passes.
    4. Take some lessons from Robot Soccer and learn some teamwork. (Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!)
    5. Remote Interface with an X10 burglar alarm. (Although "Release the vacuums!" just doesn't have the same ring as "release the hounds!)

    --sg

    --
    Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
    1. Re:Improvements. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Although "Release the vacuums!" just doesn't have the same ring as "release the hounds!

      With many dogs hating vacuums, I'd love to see that war!

  82. Again the Wall Street Journal is way ahead by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    Funny, I read a VERY similar review of the Roomba in the wall street journal several weeks ago. If you want your news fresh, the WSJ publishes articles and editorials LONG before main street news seems to get them, everything from 3 days in advance for editorials to several weeks in advance for product reviews like this one...

    And as a side bonus you get to learn how the bussiness side of things work, and fail misserably, so hopefully you can invest your hard earned cash wisely.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  83. Can I record? by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    Dum da dum
    OOOH AH!

    Dum da dum
    OOOH AH!

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    1. Re:Can I record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever moron mod'ed this person down is obviously not only an idiot, but didn't even watch the flash video at all. RTFS!

  84. Similar robot from ElectroLux by Erwin-42 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here in Scandinavia, ElectroLux has commercially launched Trilobite which is similar -- it runs around finding the walls, uses ultrasound to detect obstacles and can find its way back to the base station when necessary. This happened about a year ago (November 2001) according to the press release dates.

    Trilobite is about 12000 DKK however, which is 1500 EUR.

    Here's the Danish website with Flash demonstration and some information in English too.

  85. Isn't it typical... by nmnilsson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did they even stop to think before giving it a female name? *sigh*
    If vaccuming had been fun, it would have been l33t suXor or something...

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
    1. Re:Isn't it typical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an autonoumous cybernetic sucking machine!

  86. Those that don't remember history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a .NET developer for Microsoft, aren't you?

  87. Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run Linux?

  88. What's Excellent Carma anyway? by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    A BeoWulf cluster of these.... will take over the world in under 72 hours.

  89. Watch it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't call me honey, you don't even know me!

  90. First? by mah · · Score: 1

    This one has been around for a while: http://trilobite.electrolux.se/presskit_en/index.a sp

  91. Not so sure about Roomba beeing the fist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at:

    http://www.trilobite.electrolux.se/

    Roomba is lot cheaper though. Trilobite sells for well over $1000.

  92. good point by SonicBurst · · Score: 1

    That's a very good point....I hadn't thought about not vacuuming the closets and things like that, which would be a significant chunk. But still, the house itself (no garage yet) is ~2000 sq ft and if it takes the thing 90 minutes to do 400 sq ft, its still gonna take the thing 3 or 4 charges to do my house, since I am one of those wierd people that vacuums everything, including the tile.

    --

    Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
  93. Tom & Jerry... by killmenow · · Score: 1

    I read the headline and immediately envisioned the chaos of that Tom & Jerry cartoon where the robot comes out and cleans whenever anything touches the floor. It all goes horribly awry, of course, as T&J cartoons generally do.

    That T&J model will probably be the next revision.

  94. Has to be said. by Jim+Norton · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am teh pusher robot! I come to push humans away to protect from terrible secret of space!

    PAK CHOOIE UNF

    --
    -- Jim
  95. Linux for Roomba by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    Flash:

    A group of intrepid hackers have successfully installed Linux on the Roomba. Their distribution is named "Linux Sux".

  96. Re: Really a Electrolux ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Here's a photo of a woman posing with her new Trilobite.

    Is it just me or does it look like she is getting ready to be "taken" from behind?

  97. "News"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read about this in the mainstream news at least a month ago.

  98. Re:Stupid troll, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife is always giving guys head when I'm at work or at home. Myself included! :) I took this nice, sweet, innocent girl and turned her into a cock-crazed whore. It's really quite sweet. There is nothing like the experience of seeing your woman give another guy sexual pleasure and then getting some yourself. It makes her seem so slutty. In the end, that's all a man needs, is a slut. No one would ever guess either since she still seems pretty normal to everyone when she's not doing that. :) w00t!

  99. -1 NOT Funny by V_drive · · Score: 1

    That robot really sucks.

    I'm sorry. I'm really sorry.

    --
    char *mySig;
  100. Re:Their new robots by NutMan · · Score: 2, Funny
    In the Friendly Robotics FAQ, they have some interesting robots in the works:

    Q: Are any new robotic products coming to the market soon?
    A:Yes, our R&D is currently developing other household products that will eliminate spending time on mundane choirs.

    Are they targeting the Vienna Choir Boys or the Mormon Tabernacle Choir? Either way it seems like this is kind of a small market.

  101. form factor by Torqued · · Score: 1

    Also, the Roomba form factor/size wouldn't work in my apartment. Because of the way furniture, etc. is laid out, there are quite a few spaces and corners that the Roomba wouldn't be able to get into. I suppose it would work well if you utilized Zen decorating themes.

    Also, my cats would hate it. :)

  102. ...And space comedy movies! by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 4, Funny
    I want MegaMaid.

    "She's gone from suck...to blow!"

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
    1. Re:...And space comedy movies! by Myco · · Score: 2

      ...Suck! ...Suck! ...Suck!

  103. when will Microsoft be jumping the bandwagon? by kavau · · Score: 1

    Q: What will be the first Microsoft product that doesn't suck?

    A: A robotic vacuum cleaner!

    MUHAAHAAHAAHAAAA!!!!

  104. Re:Stupid troll, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet your floors are dirty!

  105. Cool stuff. by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

    After looking at the assorted websites and reviews (plus the "we're being /.ed so be kind to us" opener), I have to say that this is a cool piece of tech.

    For $200, I may just buy one to piss off/delight (depending on the moon cycle) my girlfriend, who takes pride in keeping her slovenly geek-boy's living conditions pristine. (she deserves a medal for that, BTW).

    I'm just waiting for version 2.0 (which you know is coming).

    Combine the preset programs of it's current mode of operation with a second set of pathfinding and room mapping (tape lines for the inital ala some consumer 'bots?) instructions.

    Then the thing would be able to use one mode to find its way to the middle of each room to be cleaned, and be able to drive itself back to the charger, switching between mapping/pathfinding modes as necessary.

    Add some floor wax and oscillating brushes, and this thing will rank pretty close to some of those old Popular Science predictions.

    Regardless, one hell of a great pilot release, and kudos on the price point!

  106. what the hell is wrong with people? by tid242 · · Score: 2
    However, when compared to a human operator, it was found that most people miss large patches when they do their vacuuming. It is just hard to remember exactly what areas have been covered (that and the constant urge of doing something more interesting). All in all, it was found that the robot covered a larger fraction of the floor, even if it did not reach all the corners.

    So they're basing this model on being better than people too ADHD'd to *remember* which parts of the floor they already vacuumed?-for some reason i'm thinking these aren't the kind of people that're going to have an extra $200 sitting around to spend on a vacuuming robot. i don't know what kind of dope they're smoking but i want some, it deeply bothers me that i can keep track of which parts of the room i vacuumed a few minutes before...

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

  107. I couldn't help myself by guibaby · · Score: 0

    I had to buy one.

    --
    Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels.
  108. As Neil Bortz would say.. by ciscoeng · · Score: 1

    Their business really sucks!

  109. One step towards the XQJ-37 Roto-Plooker by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2
    1. Re:One step towards the XQJ-37 Roto-Plooker by gruntvald · · Score: 1

      You're plooking too hard!

  110. Screw the back issues by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

    I'm going to go read all my back issues of Popular Science, I'll find a robot lawn mower or two.


    Since I don't have back issues of Popular Science (and I'm pretty lazy), I'll just search for one on Slashdot. How about this Internet-enabled lawnmowing robot?

  111. ewh, yuuuuuck by ZipperHead99 · · Score: 1

    I would like to see what happens when it tries to vacum the sick cat or dog's puke off the floor when your not home.

  112. trilobite by BobbyK · · Score: 1

    Eell trilobite came out a year ago so it's not exactly the first... trilobite

  113. I have something like this. by spudwiser · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's called a cat. It roams around the house eating anything on the floor and depositing it in a box that needs to be emptied every few days. It was even free!

    --
    .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
  114. I really like mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've had my Roomba for about two weeks now and it's great. It cleans my medium pile carpet just fine, as well as my hardwood and linolium floors. Its little bins are packed full of all the invisible crud (fuzz, hair, crumbs, dust) that I would expect a vacuum to pick up. I have doubts as to how much it actually maps out rooms as opposed to just running around randomly, but it does manage to get everywhere somehow.

    My one and only complaint is that it has no timer. I would think that it would have cost practically nothing to add functionality to allow it to automatically turn on and start on a programmed schedule, say every Wednesday at noon or something like that.

  115. obviously you are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lets be serious most people do not have the time to vacuum daily, usually once or twice a week if you are lucky. people continue to get busier and it is good that robots can save us time even if the implementation of this is limited, future version will eventually do the job right.

  116. Friendly Robotics?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell's their competitors, the Sirius Cybernetics corp?!!

    1. Re:Friendly Robotics?!!! by rindeee · · Score: 1

      Husqvarna (sp?) has an awesome robotic mower. Solar power supplement to give longer battery life. Automatically leaves its charging base, goes and mows until charge gets too low then drives back to its base and recharges...all with no user intervention. Cost quite a bit more than the Robomow as you can imagine.

  117. Movie URL anyone? by Holger+Spielmann · · Score: 1

    Could someone who has the different OS installed or some knowledge about this MS media crap be so kind to post the URL to the movie on msnbc so I can fed it into Linux Media Player? TIA

  118. Re:Stupid troll, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about a dirty floor when your wife's a whore?

  119. Screw the vacuuming... by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bring on the sexbots.

    Which would you rather spend $200 bucks on?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  120. more than one of them in a house??? by Sabalon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cause a beowulf cluster of these would really suck!

  121. the robot by friedman101 · · Score: 1

    I bet it really sucks.

  122. Gee, I wonder where I read about Roomba before... by rhwalker22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...maybe it was a month ago on washingtonpost.com. Cool picture too.

  123. GET SOME PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A automated vacuum cleaner available at the corner Brookstone for $200?!!
    Three hundred posts and nobody's asked about hacking it yet?!!!

    And you call yourselves geeks!

  124. We have one of these at work by iamchaos · · Score: 3, Informative

    And they almost work. It takes the little guy forever and sometimes he just gives up. Put him between two chairs and watch the confusion begin. It is a little loud and will get hung up quite a bit. Other than that it works great. Just keep an ear out for it to shut off and go see if it is done or gave up.

  125. Seems to be ill-suited by Anenga · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think any clean-freak mom in America would want this thing to do it's floors. I watched the video clip in the article, then you'll know what I mean.

    First of all, it seems to only floors. And it only cleans "slightly" it doesn't seem like it will go deep into the rug and get that dirt out, it does not seem powerful at all with no adaquate suction.

    In addition, it doesn't seem very intelligent. It works by sweeping around an area, then when it detects something, it will go in a circular motion to make sure it gets all of it up in that area. But it can easily roam off and miss a lot. Well, unless you give it a lot of time. In the video, they said it would take 45 minutes to clean the studio. Or a half hour to clean a small room. Do note, half of that time is probably finding the mess. That's probably it's biggest problem. Perhaps it should send out detection lasers (or whatever, the stuff that stores use for automatic doors etc.) to detect if anything is above floor level?

    The problem with actually finding the mess in a short amount of time was so paramount that they developed little pods that you put around it, to cage it in so it won't pass them and find the mess faster. While that helps, it really isn't solving the problem. Ideally, you'd start it up and it goes straight to the mess and clean it up.

    Right now, I'd consider the thing blind. Aimlessly circling around looking for crumbs.

    I wouldn't recommend it. Though, there is very good potential for "iRobot" (the company). Check back in a few years.

    1. Re:Seems to be ill-suited by gravelpup · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I watched the video clip in the article [msnbc.com], then you'll know what I mean.

      Yeah, the host was obviously Unclear On The Concept of what the Roomba was designed to do. He just put it down and expected it to seek out the mess and clean it up in a 30 second spot, and appeared frustrated when it didn't.

      Rather, this is one of those things you start up when you go off to work and you come home to a clean room. Much like the dishwasher. You shouldn't expect a lot of intelligence at a price point lower than most PDAs.

      --

      Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.

    2. Re:Seems to be ill-suited by Fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The article makes reference to the fact that this is like the swimming pool vaccuums. I have a polaris for my pool and the path it takes is completely random, it isn't even smart enough to do things like and expanding circle, etc. However, after about 15-20 minutes it always has the pool completely cleaned. You'd be surprised at how well a random walk can cover an area. Plus, you really don't need to get every part of your floor 100% clean every time. If you do this every other day, you'll probably keep the floor clean enough that it won't show.

      --
      -no broken link
  126. The Dyson DC06 has been doing this for years. by androse · · Score: 2, Informative
    I remember seeing a demo of the Dyson DC06 at least 2 years ago, maybe more. The things were commercially available at the time.

    Check it out If you are looking for the grooviest vacuum cleaners out there, get a Dyson. Expensive, but worth it.

  127. I, Robot by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2

    I think someone needs to sit down and define the term "Robot." If this thing is a robot, than so is my washing machine, my dishwasher, and my refrigerator. It doesn't even have enough smarts to plug itself in!
    Sorry, I'm waiting for the general purpose robot that is not dissuaded by staircases (no Daleks!) and can do floors, windows, and light carpentry.
    Let me know when my vacation flight to Venus is ready...

  128. My View by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    The way I see it, you only have so much time to spend on this earth. Devices like these allow you to "buy" some of it back, just like your employer buys your time from you.

    If a device costs less than the number of hours it saves, multiplied by your hourly wage, it's worth it. You can now spend your time doing fun things. Just don't use it to spend more time in front of the TV!

  129. The movie wasn't that impressive by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    Hell my first lego robot performed the same way minus the vacuum cleaner (roamed around randomly changing course when it hit something.)

    The vacuum cleaner wasn't that great, refering to the movie it just sort of threw the crap around instead of cleaning the mess.

    However this is only version 1.0. I'm suprised more /.ers don't have a more open mind about this kind of tech. for the price of a playstation it can keep light dirt of your carpet, is a great conversation piece, it's a fucking robot, it's geeky, it's kindof cool.

    Hell I think I'll get one, I'll start a nice project to hack roomba to interface with a pc so instead of randomly roaming all time it would target high traffic areas like doors and in front of the couch about 20% of the time. Hell maybe a remote control so you target those hard to reach spots or torment the cat.

    --
    >
  130. I'm almost sold.... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    ...but package this with a RealDoll that can wash dishes, and I'll buy it!

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

    1. Re:I'm almost sold.... by Sadfsdaf · · Score: 1

      Dude, I dunno where you live, but over here that's called a DISHWASHER...

    2. Re:I'm almost sold.... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

      Trust me, man, my dishwasher doesn't have three holes for easy access. If it did, I'd never leave the house.

      --

      Ed R.Zahurak

      You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  131. To be truly practical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it would need to:

    1. Be self docking to a battery station with lint drop-off abilities.
    2. Run 24/7 - That way it can be small and can be very quiet with minimal sucking power, and still clean effectively. After all, robots can work all day and night, so it needs to take advantage of that.
    3. Do multiple rooms unsupervised.
    4. It needs an algorithm that tells it the best time to start "heading home" based on factors such as battery power, distance from station, other factors.

    The critical factor to make all the above possible is that it needs to be able to maintain correct absolute coordinates - the articles suggest that it only has a relative coordinate system (i.e. won't be able to find specific locations, such as the charger...)

    Once they can fix these issues (at $200), this vacuum should make a standard vacuum completely obsolete.

  132. No $hit huh? by Aexia · · Score: 1, Troll

    NOTE: We are experiencing high network traffic which may slow down the performance of your browser on this website.

  133. Just what I needed by davilan · · Score: 1

    Will someone mod this thing to run XBOX games ? I always wanted robotwars@home. Vote: Does it suck or does it blow ?

  134. Just bought one... by jfinke · · Score: 5, Informative
    I just bought one last weekend. It is pretty slick. It does what it claims to do. You can just let it go and return later and your room is clean. I have 3 cats and the amount of cat hair it picks up is pretty amazing.

    It manuevers around and under everything that is over 6" high. So, it can deal with coffee tables, chairs, beds, etc. It detects stairs and avoids them. It comes with a virtual wall unit (you can buy more), that sends out a signal the roomba won't cross. When I first got it, I put it is my main room. It has a TV, a large L shaped couch, and 2 litter boxes. The room is 20x10. I eat in front of the tv, so you can imagine all that crap. I ran it in there, and I was amazed at all the stuff if picked up.

    There are a few caveats, however. Battery life. You can only do "3 medium size rooms". My carpet is pretty thick, however. It is closer to 2 rooms. Plus, the time to charge the battery is 12 hours. You can buy spare batteries and a "quick charger", however, they are $60 bucks apiece. It is designed to do one room at a time, so you just can't put it up on the second floor and let it do everything. You have to put it into a room, close the door, and let it rip. It is not designed as a spot cleaner. If you have one really messy part of the room, you are better off getting your regular vacuum and vacumming that part of the room and then putting the roomba to work. The dirt collector is pretty small, so you have to empty it out after every room. Also, because of all the cat hair, I spend a lot of time cleaning the brushes and making sure the machine is clean. Unfortunately, it does not map out the room, so it may go over some areas that are not as high traffic as others, due to the algorithm that is uses.

    My girlfriend thought I was nuts for buying it. However, for $200 bucks, (the price a of a decent vacuum) it is pretty cool. Now, only if it would travel stairs, do multiple rooms, have a larger dirt container, and plug itself back in, it would be near perfect

    1. Re:Just bought one... by jfinke · · Score: 1

      By the way... 2 of my cats just follow the thing around wondering what the hell it is... Whating them try and figure the thing out is pure entertainment... You probably have to be a cat person to enjoy that... ;)

  135. sounds good to me by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

    The article basically said it was good if you lived in a small place such as an apartment or didn't have kids, but if you need to do heavy duty cleaning, the 'bot wasn't gonna repalce your standard vac.

    And that would be perfect for me (lazy bachelor that I am) since I could set this thing to vacuum a different large room every day when I leave for work, on a rotation. In theory, the dirt would never build up to the point where I need to do the heavy-duty vacuum--or at least not a FULL run with the big vac. All I'd have to worry about is the stairs occasionally, using my other vac.

    Plus, I just want to tell people that my robot does the cleaning-- I mean it's 2002 already. We're officially in The Future now. If only it talked... but I guess the mod scene hasn't begun on this thing yet.

    If somebody makes a speech add-on, I'd just make it say "dammit!" every time it bumped into a wall or piece of furniture. And perhaps make R2D2 noises in the mean time.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  136. I've had it for a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ok, I've had one of these for a month now (SharperImage.com sent them out about 5 days before the official release). They are pretty cool.
    1. The one I have will run about 90 minutes or so on a combination carpet/tile floor.
    2. It follows both the walls, doors, and its "virtual walls" quite well.
    3. It makes "Carpet circles" all over the carpet. Mel Gibson will be making a movie about this some time I am sure.
    4. Amazingly it does a pretty good job of getting dirt and cat fur up.
    5. It doesn't fall down the stairs, has only gotten hung up 1 time in a month (Barbie's hair).
    6. It looks like a horseshoe crab moving around.

    It is pretty impressive. What it needs (they have them but not shipped) is an extra charger so that you can charge a battery while it is cleaning.

    1. Re:I've had it for a month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, a ps to the above, it is NOT that noisy, quiter than a regular vacuum and the cats have gotten pretty used to it. :-)

  137. Friendly Machines did this in the early 90s by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    Friendly Machines had one of these a few years ago... They also have a robotic mower and a robotic golf caddy if I'm not mistaken.

  138. Speaking of lego's (see story icon) by Arcturax · · Score: 2

    Will this thing be smart enough to avoid all the legos I have on the floor? :)

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  139. To all /. folks who say "What can't it do ...." by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 2

    To all /. folks who say "What can't it do ...."

    Unknown investor to a Mr. H. Ford I'm sorry that we can't invest in your factory for this "Model A" of yours, but it just doesn't do enough. It takes too much of this "Gasoline" to go very far, the travel distance is too short to be of practical value, it can only go on roads, and it doesn't even seat a whole family.

    Maybe you should come up with some way of improving regular carriages instead of wasting any more time on this "Horseless" carriage of yours.

    Come on now, this is the first edition/first draft. It's only aimed at "Early Adapters", not at your mother. It will improve in time, just as the Model A, improved to the Model T, and so on.

    What this does do however is give them a "First to Market" advantage in this country.

  140. More About Henry Ford Here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  141. TOTALLY Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who Moderated this guy to a 5?

    Here's the beef. The company which developed the Roomba is iRobot, a well-known AI robot platform firm. The Roomba uses an algorithm derived from AI research in ordinance disposal robots for DARPA. Stuff like minefield clearing.

    As I understand it, the algorithm basically works like this: The robot looks for a wall. Then it wall-follows all the way around the room. At this point it has determined the shape of the room. It then proceeds to follow a spiral pattern. As it identifies obstacles, it wall-follows around the obstacles (using the Bug algorithm) and continues the spiral. When it reaches the center of the room, it

    Anyone who's actually HANDLED the Roomba (unlike the parent poster -- Score 5 indeed!) would note that it's not symmetric: it has a distance sensor and a cleaning brush on one side but not on the other. This is because it only wall-follows in one direction (clockwise? counterclockwise? I forget), and cleans along the wall edge as it does so. I believe it needs the sensor to determine when the edge has gone away and it needs to turn to compensate.

  142. Magnet. by quitcherbitchen · · Score: 1

    I'd probably attach a sturdy magnet to get paperclips or pins to it. I'd reccommend this with any vacuum.

    Just a tip from an old janitors job.

  143. Cross one item off the "Rocket Packs" list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, as the song goes...

    It's the eighties
    It's the eighties so where's our rocket packs
    It's the eighties so where's our rocket packs?
    Go anywhere, we strap them on our backs

    I thought by now I'd walk the moon
    And ride a car without no tires
    And have a robot run the vacuum
    And date a girl made out of wires
    No thing's don't change that much, do they?
    We are still out of touch, by now we should discover
    Just how to love each other, like Klattus' robot man
    Your looks have killed again
    If I wind up getting one of these, I'm definitely going to refer to it as "Horrendous Disc".
  144. obligatory star wars reference by cosyne · · Score: 2

    Huh. And the news media refered to our avatar system as an R2D2-like "dustbin on wheels."

  145. scr by cosyne · · Score: 1

    "She's gone from suck...to blow!"

    There's a difference?

  146. Why?? Re:Just bought one... by draziw · · Score: 1

    If you have to clean brushes and dir collector all the time, it would take less time to just do a quick vacuum job with a nice $120-$170 HEPA vac, which would do a better job.

    1. Re:Why?? Re:Just bought one... by jfinke · · Score: 1

      I agree that it is more toy than tool. However, I believe that it is a wave of the future. Devices like this are going to become more common place. I think a lot of my issues come from having the cats.

  147. Did it save you time? by HillClimber · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the review! Which do you think takes more time -- moving the Roomba, replacing its batteries, emptying its dirt collector, etc... -- or vacuuming the regular way?

    1. Re:Did it save you time? by jfinke · · Score: 1

      It probably takes more time to clean everything out etc... But, it is a neat feeling to just push a button, leave, and come back, and the floor is clean... ;)

  148. MS Vacuum by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

    Finally - Microsoft designs and markets a product that's MEANT to suck.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  149. Give me a flying car... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    ...and the 1950s view of tomorrow will be complete.

    --Joey

  150. Roomba is not a Hoover by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Probably because it is a Hoover.

    No. Roomba is not a Hoover(tm) brand vacuum cleaner; it's a Roomba(tm) brand vacuum cleaner.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  151. Other vaccum robots by prototype · · Score: 2

    There's been a lot of vaccum based robots already out on the market, and reasonably priced. If you're interested, the Cye robot came out a year or two ago (http://www.personalrobots.com/home.html) and offered a vaccum attachement as well as open source software (under agreement) that mapped out rooms. It also returns to the charger for you. Maybe if these two companies put their heads together they might have something.

  152. Didn't Space Balls teach us anything? by cmstremi · · Score: 1

    "She's gone from suck to blow!"

    That was one evil vacuum...

  153. And in the silver and yellow corner... by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2

    Dyson also have one featuring their cool see through canister and dual cyclone technology - shame it's not thair Root Cyclone though.

    See http://www.dyson.co.uk/range/feature_frame.asp?mod el=DC06 for pics and details.

    --
    Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
  154. RIPOFF!! It seems to be one anyway.. by mattr · · Score: 2

    This looks like a total ripoff of the TRILOBITE by Electrolux. I coordinated an event called Swedish Style in Tokyo 2002 (Oct 1 to 15, just ended) where it was announced with Toshiba, who helped them get it ready for Japan and distribute it.

    We had the robot running for real for two weeks so even if there is no relation (extremely hard to believe) Electrolux is definitely first and we announced it first.
    Check out the homepage which is also better done, at http://www.electrolux.se/ (it was released in Sweden earlier).

    The Trilobite automatically maps out the room, has tons of sensors and automatically docks, can be hemmed in by magnetic tape so it doesn't go down the stairs, and when you watch it it seems pretty smart.

    For anyone who does not know it, Electrolux probably makes the best vaccuum cleaners in the world, in addition to fridges, and also has th majority of riding lawnmower sales as well apparently. I am biased because 1) my family has used their vacuums for 30 years and never breaks and 2) I just made a commercial for two other products of Electrolux, a steam gun (very cool, clean, stylish, well done..) and oxygen, another vacuum cleaner. As it happens Oxygen gives off exhaust air out the back which is as clean as what you get from dedicated air cleaners; a baby can crawl behind it. Just shows to go ya, these guys must have hurried to make a press release and flashy homepage to not miss out on timing and presumably their investors.

    Of course there is a very small chance that this is Electrolux. And iRobot may have great people and this is convergent evolution etc. BUT it is hard to believe that they are unaware of what Electrolux has been doing for so long and this is very misleading. If Electrolux is inside they should get the CREDIT.

    Matt Rosin
    Telebody Inc.
    Tokyo Japan

    1. Re:RIPOFF!! It seems to be one anyway.. by mattr · · Score: 2

      P.S. I am also biased because in addition to shooting that commercial for Electrolux, they also paid for time on four giant outdoor television screens in Tokyo these past two weeks. I provided free time (3 minutes per hour) for the Swedish government and Electrolux and Volvo decided to add some paid ads of their own.

      On the other hand, I also have worked with MIT and robot designers, and have nothing against them, and the gecko stuff and iRobot is also quite neat. More power to them. But they are not the first, and it is not evident that they know anything about vacuum cleaners or robots in the home, or what the quality is since the price is about ten times less than the trilobite.

      My own hope is for a telescoping legged robot that can do things for me remotely, preferably bigger than an aibo and closer in price to an irobot. If it can clean the toilet or do the dishes that is also a plus.

      In the end who cares who is first, these things take a long time to develop and I hope those iRobot guys do well.

      But no more misleading stories please, slashdot. You can do you research too.

  155. PAK CHOOIE UNF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you, mr. lowtax of something awful dot com. i am padding this with some lowercase text because it is a well known fact that Vacumn Bots do not speak in lowercase. Stupid damn capital letter filter upon this slashdot dot org website. lalalalallalalallalalallalalal okay that should be enough word to that homies


    PAK CHOOIE
    DATA: TO CLEAN
    TARGET: GRANDMA>
    ACTION: ENGAGE BEAT DUSTING ON CLOTHESLINE HANG
    DATA:FOR EVERLASTING PEACE

    PAK CHOOIE UNF

  156. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, ya think that since this is an exercise in the Russell/Novig Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (the big red one--see "agent, vacuum" in the index) prior art can be found?

  157. Energy efficiency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since this thing is doing a modified random walk, it has to be on for AGES to cover nearly all of its work area. How much more electricity does it use than a guy with an ordinary vacuum cleaner? Proc6 syas he can do the job is one tenth the time of Roomba. Granted, he must do a bit of physical work, and yet I think vacuum cleaners draw a LOT of current. But maybe we shouldn't criticize the talking dog?

  158. Re: Really a Electrolux ripoff by orthogonal · · Score: 2

    Is it just me or does it look like she is getting ready to be "taken" from behind?

    That's how she earned the 12000 kroner it costs to buy the Trilobite.

  159. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    A certain monk had a habit of pestering the Grand Tortue (the only one who
    had ever reached the Enlightenment 'Yond Enlightenment), by asking whether
    various objects had Buddha-nature or not. To such a question Tortue
    invariably sat silent. The monk had already asked about a bean, a lake,
    and a moonlit night. One day he brought to Tortue a piece of string, and
    asked the same question. In reply, the Grand Tortue grasped the loop
    between his feet and, with a few simple manipulations, created a complex
    string which he proferred wordlessly to the monk. At that moment, the monk
    was enlightened.

    From then on, the monk did not bother Tortue. Instead, he made string after
    string by Tortue's method; and he passed the method on to his own disciples,
    who passed it on to theirs.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...