Slashdot Mirror


The Rise of Cyber Bullying

santos_douglas writes "The Detroit Free Press has an article detailing the problems schoolchildren now face in the form of online cyber bullying. As if parents didn't already have enough to worry about! Examples include rumor spreading typically via text messaging, threatening emails, invasive pictures taken with camera phones, and the most extreme - creating entire websites to criticize/threaten/harass another student. The article suggests many tips for combating the problem - chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies. I suppose this is another example of an inevitable downside to the interconnected world. Mandatory Google search for your added reading pleasure."

803 comments

  1. Oh man... by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wow. Man am I glad that I didn't have to worry about this stuff when I was in elementary school. I was a fat kid that got picked on by two scrawny girls I now call the "Joslin Twins". I don't think I could have handled it if they would have setup a website detailing all of my shortcomings and reasons why other people should hate me since I was fat. It's a good thing that they've forgotten about me and they're white trash. They wouldn't even begin to know how to put up a website.

    Does Front Page Express still come free with Windows? I hope not...

    --


    The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    1. Re:Oh man... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      I wish they had stuff this bad in my day. I was the know-it all smart-assed geek who hated jocks and got the crap beaten out of me almost daily. Even the boy scout troop gave me a dirty swirlie in an outhouse.

      Revenge is sweet tho; all these big jocks are MBA's now and pay big $$$ for their websites, etc. Of course, my *own* sites are free... :D

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:Oh man... by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 1
      I hear you. I was the drugged out looser that everyone talked about behind my back.

      Life's lessons can be a beautiful thing if you respond positively.

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    3. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


      Even the boy scout troop gave me a dirty swirlie in an outhouse

      Uhh... here in .ca that means you had your butthole eaten out, no kidding.

    4. Re:Oh man... by Ronin_Bic · · Score: 1

      I see this as a form of balencing most of the time the people getting picked on phyiscally are the ones that know how to make a website. The victim now can return fire.

    5. Re:Oh man... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      The victim now can return fire.

      The Columbine shooters had a website, too..

    6. Re:Oh man... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Revenge is sweet tho; all these big jocks are MBA's now and pay big $$$ for their websites, etc. Of course, my *own* sites are free... :D

      Yeah, and they probably have to pay someone to fix that expensive Porche they have! And look at the money you saved by not buying breast implants for your trophy wife!! I guess the joke is on those losers!

    7. Re:Oh man... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I was the drugged out looser that everyone talked about behind my back.

      You think THAT's bad, I'm a drugged-out loser, though no one knows. And I STILL get made fun of behind my back.

    8. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and they probably have to pay someone to fix that expensive Porche they have! And look at the money you saved by not buying breast implants for your trophy wife!! I guess the joke is on those losers!

      .....bzzzzzt WRONG ANSWER! I know for a FACT that all of the fuckwad jocks who made fun of me in high school are still living in that shit little podunk whitebread town, working at garages and gas stations and huffing carburator fluid from a sock! Me? I am a professional in New York City making very decent cache and am enganged to a beautiful professional woman who makes even more money than I do! Having a good social life in high school does *NOT* equate to success in life!

    9. Re:Oh man... by JeffWhitledge · · Score: 0

      As everyone knows, when a girl makes an offensive Web site about you, it just means that she secretly likes you.

      --
      These comments do express the opinions of my employers, and, personally, I think they're complete rubbish.
    10. Re:Oh man... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am a professional in New York City making very decent cache

      So is it level 1 or level 2?

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    11. Re:Oh man... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > > The victim now can return fire.
      > The Columbine shooters had a website, too..

      ...And they returned fire, as the poster said. What's your point?

    12. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it looks like somebody has something to prove!

      Look out, 10-year reunion! It's gonna look like Grosse Pointe!

    13. Re:Oh man... by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      The Columbine shooters had a website, too..

      yeah, and maybe there was a reason for that...

    14. Re:Oh man... by rowdent · · Score: 1

      here in .on.ca I've never heard of dirty swirlie meaning getting your butthole eaten out, but who knows? Canadia's a big country, eh?

      --
      "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." --George Orwell
    15. Re:Oh man... by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      How about this: if you're going to "do something" about this problem, only do it to web sites that don't validate.

    16. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the obligitory "who cares" comment. Just get out there and do what you do. :) Working as a mechanic is no less fufilling a job as code twiddling. Pay is almost as ludicrious too, if you're good enough.
      There's nothing wrong with working with your hands instead of with keys on a keyboard. Get over it.

    17. Re:Oh man... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Foo: I am a professional in New York City making very decent cache
      Bar: So is it level 1 or level 2?

      Hey, I think the guy's pretty 1337. Most of the folks I've dealt with who are talking about (memory) cache spell it "CASH", or prounounce it "cash-ay".

      As in, "Does this PC have enough cash-ay?" To which the appropriate response, it seems, would be "It depends on how you accessorize, dahhhling."

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    18. Re:Oh man... by Spoticus · · Score: 1

      >Does Front Page Express still come free with Windows? I hope not...

      No, but that geocities website with all the midi's and ani-gif's you put up 5 years ago is still there...

    19. Re:Oh man... by MicrowaveJesus · · Score: 1

      Having a good social life in high school does *NOT* equate to success in life! If you're so successful than why does it come off like you still hold a huge grudge to all those kids that used to pick on you in high school? Shouldn't you just stop caring and be happy with the loads of cash, your beautiful professional wife and live your nice professional life?

    20. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, cache has traditionally been pronounced "cashay" when referring to hidden storage space, from where memory cache gets it's name (as it is RAM memory that is set aside as a specialized buffer storage; used to optimize data transfers between system elements with different characteristics.) Like most words, mispronunciation has slowly devolved the word into being pronounced "cash" by those who did not recognise the word from its origins. In short, "cashay" is the correct pronunciation, "cash" is incorrect but accepted.

    21. Re:Oh man... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      All of the jocks are still there huffing out of a sock? I believe you are a Big Fat Liar. And the fact that she's a "professional titty dancer" doesn't impress. But I do like that she can take my money with her cooter. Neat trick.

    22. Re:Oh man... by Alexei · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that's incorrect. Cache is pronounced the same way cash is.

    23. Re:Oh man... by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      I am a professional in New York City making very decent cache
      "Very decent"? Is that anything like "extra medium"?
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    24. Re:Oh man... by The+Patient · · Score: 1
      and am enganged to a beautiful professional woman

      Does that mean several other guys are engaged to her as well? Or is it a biker club thing?

    25. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought the "identity theft" solution was a good one.

      If you can't beat the bullies... Become them.

      RSC

    26. Re:Oh man... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      In short, "cashay" is the correct pronunciation, "cash" is incorrect but accepted.

      That's not what the american heritage book of english usage says says

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      joslintwinssuck.com appears to be available if you want to register it.

    28. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      You were a drugged out looser?
      Looser than what???

  2. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    My modem can beat up your modem!

    1. Re:ha by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      My modem can beat up your modem!

      YEAH??? Well MY 768/128 DSL line can beat up your scrawny 56k v.90 modem any day of the week!

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  3. Something to ponder .... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I decide to start bullying someone on the ACLU message boards will the ACLU take it down? Wouldn't it violate my speech rights if they do even if it is slander?

    I am not taking a position pro or con on the ACLU but it does seem like an interesting situation.

    Just as an interesting thing to add, the ACLU does have a student rights forum

    1. Re:Something to ponder .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of speech is for public places. Not schools or internet forums.

      And even so, there's a limit on what you can say

    2. Re:Something to ponder .... by leerpm · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slander is not a protected form of free speech. You have every right to voice your complaint about someone or some company, but if you start posting lies in a public forum, intending to harm a third-party, then you are opening yourself up to a libel suit.

      Bullying is not protected by the First Amendment.

    3. Re:Something to ponder .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now wait...you said lies are not protected under free speech. Who said you have to lie to bully? That 15-year-old girl is obviously fat...it's not a lie.

    4. Re:Something to ponder .... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your post is offtopic, really. But since you asked:

      ACLU Message Board Policy

      Fairly self-explanatory. You're pretty safe to post whatever you want as long as you aren't being a serious asshat.

    5. Re:Something to ponder .... by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Very rarely, does bullying involve spreading only 100% truthful information. Kids do not simply state "someone is fat", they embellish on it, and twist it into half-truth rumours to spread.

    6. Re:Something to ponder .... by bgog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree this this sucks for the victim but the solution lies with the parents or law enforcement. It is frankly none of the schools buisness what kids do when they are not there. I've heard too many cases where schools have attempted to play god and punnish students for activities that too place on weekends etc. If a kid does something bad off school hours, this would qualify, then the parents are responisble. A School is there to teach and keep order/disipline while the kid are there. Now if this was done on school time or on a school computer, that is a completely different matter.

    7. Re:Something to ponder .... by Kenja · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your honor, we the prosecution intend to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that our clients mama is not so fat that when she sits around the house, she site AROUND the house.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:Something to ponder .... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bullying is not protected by the First Amendment.

      Bullying is imprecise term, and carries with it connonations of "boys will be boys" expectations. We would be better servered to call acts of bullying by their specific names: assault, battery, harassment, defamation, and so on.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    9. Re:Something to ponder .... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Kids do not simply state "someone is fat"

      Yes, saying "She's a fatty fatty poopoohead." Is valid (assuming she truly is a poopoohead, which is beyond the scope of this forum).

      Saying "She's as fat as a rhinocerous" would, OTOH, be bad (assuming she is not as fat as a rhinocerous, which she probably is not).

    10. Re:Something to ponder .... by RevMike · · Score: 1
      It is frankly none of the schools buisness what kids do when they are not there. I've heard too many cases where schools have attempted to play god and punnish students for activities that too[k] place on weekends etc. If a kid does something bad off school hours, this would qualify, then the parents are responisble. A School is there to teach and keep order/disipline while the kid are there.

      I tend to agree with you but I think it is worth playing devil's advocate...

      You state "School is there to teach". One might argue that if a kid does something outside of school that substantially disrupts the school's ability to fulfill its mission of teaching, then the school does have a legitimiate interest. As an example, if two kids get into a fist fight in the neighborhood, that in itself shouldn't get the school involved. However, if two kids get into a fight in the neighborhood and the friends of the loser come to school seeking retribution, then the school is disrupted.

    11. Re:Something to ponder .... by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Saying "she's as fat as a rhinoceros" could not be reasonably construed by anyone as a literal fact. You know it's an exaggeration. Go watch "The People vs. Larry Flynt" for more information.

    12. Re:Something to ponder .... by xenoandroid · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Something to ponder .... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      However, I could post on an open forum that I think you're an absolute shithead, and this violates no law whatsoever. I could also say that I suspect you're an AIDS-carrying fudge-packing meat-spanking loser, and this too is a form of protected free speech.

      But any way you cut it, all this really says is that I'm a complete asshole. And a bigot, to boot. Either that or I'm just trying to piss you off and make you miserable, and this just seems to be the most effective way to do it.

      Which is the intent of bullying, no? You can bully people in a variety of ways without violating the Constitution or local law.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    14. Re:Something to ponder .... by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it violate my speech rights if they do even if it is slander?

      s/slander/libel/

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  4. There was a case in school by Pingular · · Score: 2, Insightful

    some kid had set up a website devoted to hating this teacher, school found out about it and he got excluded. This isn't limited to schools of course, anyone can be the victim of these, but seriously, in real life this would cause you trouble, but on the internet things like this are easily avoided.

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:There was a case in school by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      some kid had set up a website devoted to hating this teacher, school found out about it and he got excluded.

      I read that as executed - yeah, i think i better lay off the caffiene and get some sleep tonight...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:There was a case in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's funny how things change depending on the age group. Although not a site dedicated to pure hate
      • http://www.professorperformance.com
        • sure allows college students to say how they feel about a teacher. It ain't all good either.
  5. You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by bedouin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity for the nerds to get even with the bullies?

    1. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      "Perfect" assuming the bullies don't know who did it. I can't imagine things going well for the nerds otherwise!

    2. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullies aren't automatically idiots. They can use the internet too, although maybe not as well as you... but who gives a shit when they've got you at school AND at home, knowing that they've got this crap up for everyone to see. Possibly with your phone number and address. Who's gonna get more attention?

      In any case, two wrongs do not make a right. The only solution is for schools to take a zero-tolerance approach. Not just in theory, but in practice.

    3. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      what would be even better would be to use new technologies to document the bullying - then to catalog it all, and sue the fsck out of the bully kids shithead parents for damages (bikes, locker contents, clothes, glasses, etc) and for emotional distress.

      if bullys can use their genetics to beat up on us little guys, we should be able to do the same.

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    4. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A zero-tolerance approach just isn't feasible. It's impossible for a school to review everything a kid posts on the net. Anyway, bullies have free speach rights too. As long as the material isn't specifically threatening, the school _shouldn't_ try to do anything about it.

      As for bullies automatically being idiots: you'd be surprised. Generally if they're intelligent enough to have well-developed computer skills, that intelligence makes them secure enough that they don't need to bully.

    5. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity for the nerds to get even with the bullies?

      I did precisely that, by embarrassing them. What could be worse for the "cool guy's" tough image than getting kicked in the throat by the fat nerdy black kid?

      Before you ask, yes I did this. Later that same year, I lifted a kid 2 years older than me off of his feet and blackened his eye with a haymaker right hand.

      We need to start teaching children how to defend themselves. Regardless of school policy, legally you have the right to defend yourself. If bullies are pushing your kid around, if bullies are beating your kid up, give your child the means to defend him/herself. Let your kid know that even if he/she gets in trouble at school for standing up for him/herself, you'll back him/her up.

      Thankfully my mother let me off of the leash, so to speak, that the school tried to keep me on. Beat the bullies senseless two or three times, and guess what, they leave you alone.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Wouldn't this be a perfect opportunity for the nerds to get even with the bullies?

      Naw, that's what Columbine was for.

    7. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Thankfully my mother let me off of the leash, so to speak, that the school tried to keep me on. Beat the bullies senseless two or three times, and guess what, they leave you alone.

      I only had to do it once... as when the coach was pulling me off him I wispered in his hear that they won't find his body next time...

      Bullies use Fear as an intimidator... Use it against them and they back way off.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by ViolentGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, this is exactly what we need. Teach kids to solve their differences with fights. That way, when that generation is running the world, they can have one massive nuclear war to make an example of some small country like Gibralter for calling socks the cat an asshat.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    9. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      He isn't saying that we should teach our kids to attack someone for the smallest slight, just to fight back when attacked. Big difference.

    10. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It's pretty rough if you want to keep a clean record though. The rules are clear, if you fight back, you get suspension. If you don't fight back, maybe you can avoid suspension. Unfortunatly this leads to the rise of people with marginal grades paying off the bullies to get the curvebreakers suspending right before a big test. Even though that sort of abuse is rare, it basically puts the power of suspension in the hands of whoever has the least to loose (IE, most big dumb bullies).

      I only ever fought back once, and learned the lesson well. Unfortunatly, it took me years to realize that nobody except the school system cares about your permanent record card.

      Fortunately, once you get out of middle school/junior high most of those problems drop out, and sometimes you get lucky and they're sent off to private school (especially with the military).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is exactly what we need. Teach kids to solve their differences with fights.

      Yea, so? What are you going to do about it, pussy?

    12. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We need to start teaching children how to defend themselves. Regardless of school policy, legally you have the right to defend yourself.

      mod parent up.

      I went to a school that had the policy of suspending all sutdents involved in a fight, regardless of who started it. The result of this policy is that I never told anyone when I got beat up by the bullies, out of fear of getting suspended myself.

      ( this was a pretty fucked up "christian" school, so yes, the possibility of getting suspended for being a victim was real)

    13. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is exactly what we need. Teach kids to solve their differences with fights.

      You missed my point. I'm not talking about using violence to resolve differences. I'm talking about letting your kid know that it is alright to defend himself. Legally, Morally, and ethically there are no problems with self defense.

      If you throw a punch at me, I'm going to try to break your nose. If you pull a knife on me, I'm going to pull a gun on you. If you pull a gun on me, I'm going to shoot you in the face. Most importantly, if you leave me alone. I'll leave you alone.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    14. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that's a nice theory, but in this case the problem was that the girl didn't even know who did it! Does she have to beat the kids up?

      Cyberbullying is another problem entirely. When you see an embarrasing picture of you broadcasted to all emails of your classmates, there is very little you can do to catch the sender, as you don't even know who he is...

      I do believe we need a cyberpolice that would have the right (with an appropriate warrant-like paper) to get IPs of any user in a reasonnable timeframe span - say 6 month back. but that is another problem altogether. Anonymity is not good crime-wise. Granted these bullies are not really criminals, but that is still something we should investigate and get back to them with all the force of the legal system to scare them and make them understand once and for all that their actions have consequences, and that they hould think about those prior to doing anything stupid.

    15. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Progress!

    16. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It's pretty rough if you want to keep a clean record though. The rules are clear, if you fight back, you get suspension.

      I got into the second fight that I described above while serving out an in-school suspension for another fight. My 7th grade year, I got into 4 fights. I won three of them. I have only had to fight twice since then. I haven't had to fight in over a decade. I hope that I never have to again. But your immediate safety and your long term mental health are far more important than taking a 3 day vacation from school.

      Fortunately, once you get out of middle school/junior high most of those problems drop out, and sometimes you get lucky and they're sent off to private school (especially with the military).

      Sometimes after you get older, they like having you around, because even bullies are afraid of someone.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    17. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      This will go down on your permanent record...

      So What! I was the "chubby nerdy kid" (go figure, on slashdot ), and I got picked on by kids who were "looking for an easy mark". After I hit them, they never bothered me again. Of course we moved a couple of times, so I had to do it three times total. The last two times they had to suspend me (in-school, very very boring), but even the administrators never "gave me a lession". They knew what was happening, and I don't think they blamed me.

      However, I have never heard of bullies beating up kids just before a test to impove the "curve", that would assume that a typical bully cares about grades.

      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    18. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      When you see an embarrasing picture of you broadcasted to all emails of your classmates, there is very little you can do to catch the sender, as you don't even know who he is...

      When I was in my early 20s, I over did it on the booze at a friend's 4th of July party. I passed out in the bathroom with my pants around my ankles. Another of our friend snuck in and snapped a picture of me. She emailed it to about 20 people that we know. That is the most embarrassing picture of me in existance, but you know what? There was no crime.

      Anonymity is not good crime-wise.

      It's not good for freedom either. In case you don't remember, Deep Throat, the anonymous informant is the reason why we found out as much as we know about Watergate.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The kids at school used to beat me up and call me names until I finally showed them. My buddy and I went to school with Tech-9s and loads of ammo. We shot up the whole place. We were L33T!

      I think you mean "Tec-9s". Dumbass. Move along now little Troll, go bother someone else.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    20. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by radish · · Score: 1

      Well you're free to bring your kids up how you see fit, but personally I'd seek not to perpetuate the cycle of violence. Yes I got picked on a lot at school (fat nerdy kid) but guess what? I survived, without having to lower myself to their level. I'll be teaching my kids to use their intelligence rather than their fists to get out of tough situations. What would I tell my kids if someone is threatening them? If it's not serious ignore it, laugh it off. If it is serious, tell an adult. Most importantly of all, tell me. The absolute worse thing about being bullied (in my experience) is thinking that no one cares.

      IMHO Ghandi had it right - an eye for an eye and all that.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    21. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I went to a school that had the policy of suspending all sutdents involved in a fight, regardless of who started it. The result of this policy is that I never told anyone when I got beat up by the bullies, out of fear of getting suspended myself.

      I can understand the logic of suspending everyone involved. If a "popular" person tries to beat up an "unpopular" person, who do you think the witnesses will blame for "starting it"?

      The one time in Jr. HS that I just got my ass handed to me, I didn't face suspension. Thankfully there were enought people that saw the fight to tell the powers that be that I got sucker punched by the other kid.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    22. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deterrence works. Ever hear of the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction?

    23. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Greedo · · Score: 1

      And we wonder why violence is more prevelant among younger children.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    24. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Yakko · · Score: 1

      How would you solve the differences, then? Talk to them? Tell the teacher? Tell your mother? Tell the fuckchop's mother? Ignore it? Slit your wrists?

      I've been through all this when I was a kid, and none of it EVER works.

      So tell me... what IS the right way to solve the problem?

      I'm not trying to be snarky, but if you think you have a solution, please share it.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    25. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Well you're free to bring your kids up how you see fit, but personally I'd seek not to perpetuate the cycle of violence.

      I respect your opinion. I just see things differently. As I see it, you can not stop the cycle of violence by allowing it to continue.

      Bullies perpatrate violence because they don't believe that their victims can or will stop them. So to end their predatory behavior, you have to stop outside of the victim mold.

      I'll be teaching my kids to use their intelligence rather than their fists to get out of tough situations.

      You are right, except for those times when they are under assault. You can't out think or out reason someone's fist.

      What would I tell my kids if someone is threatening them? If it's not serious ignore it, laugh it off. If it is serious, tell an adult. Most importantly of all, tell me.

      What do you tell your children if they are attacked? This is the heart of what I'm discussing. Other kids saying mean things is meaningless. I'm talking about the kids who shove or hit people that they perceive to be smaller or weaker.

      I'm not talking about beating another kid senseless because he says that your mother wears army boots.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    26. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a big difference. Most people confuse the smallest slight with an attack.

    27. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      And we wonder why violence is more prevelant among younger children.

      Disregard your fantasy world for just a moment, look at the real world.

      What kept the USA and the USSR from destroying this planet?

      The knowledge that if either side does something stupid, we'll all pay for it.

      This principle works with world superpowers, it also works with school children.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    28. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by lederen · · Score: 1

      > Bullies use Fear as an intimidator...

      Um... As opposed to what?

    29. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll coward this out, so you may never read me:

      Anyway, I was seriously bullied at school. I once came home with cuts covering 90% of my body due to being drqgged over the dry rocky ground for an entire recess. I was forced to face these people for the next decade after that.

      "Telling" anyone helped nothing. Even after the police got involved.

      Some bullies only understand one thing, serious physical threat and if they are too stupid ot understand, actual follow through.

    30. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What you condone is an escalation of violence. Notice that you always do more violence than the other person in each example. This is a problem in real life. Something starts with a small slight, then the tit-for-tat gets worse and worse until someone is dead. Please don't teach your children this.

      When I was in 4th grade I realized that I could get into a big fight with myself. Until then, I thought like you. They push, I push harder. I decided that was really stupid.

      It takes real guts to bring something back down instead of following your animal instinct and getting revenge.

    31. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Well, I agree with you that in your case, there is no crime. The article linked mentionned a website threatening the girl to death. Of course, we should not send the guy to jail for that, but I still think a reminder exposing him publicly and reminding him that when you do something stupid you get caught cannot do any harm!

    32. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point that it is OK to defend yourself and that a child should understand that. But you, and that child, should also understand that violence begets violence and that just because you hit someone back harder than they hit you doesn't mean they will stop. There is always someone stronger, with a bigger gun or knife, that will take you out at the first opportunity. The best option is always the nonviolent option.

      I admit this does not always work. I have been in my fair share of fights. I have had sticks, knives and guns pulled on me. I know how to remove those weapons from an attacker and how to immobilize that attacker without use of fatal force and I have done so on 3 occasions. So don't think this comes from some whiney pussy with no idea what they are talking about. If you have the option, simply walk away. This is a difficult decision for a mature adult to make so don't expect a child to be able to understand that even when Daddy says it's ok to beat someone up sometimes you're better off not doing so.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    33. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      What you condone is an escalation of violence.

      Yes.

      Notice that you always do more violence than the other person in each example.

      That is intentional. A potential attacker must know that any hostility on his part will be met with a certain and immediate consequence. The goal isn't to do any of those things. The goal is to never have to because a potential attacker knows that you will if you have to.

      It takes real guts to bring something back down instead of following your animal instinct and getting revenge.

      You can't reason with a rabid dog. If someone is thinking of doing bodily harm to you, they should know what will result from it.

      Let me present it to you in this way. If we lived on the same street, in the same neighborhood and we had identical houses across the street from one another. On your house, you have rainbow stickers on the windows, a million mom march bumber sticker on your car, and vegan pride flag on a pole in the front yard. My house has NRA stickers on the windows, I have a "Vote Freedom First" bumpersticker on my car, and a POW-MIA flag on a pole in my front yard.

      Given this scenario, if someone were in our neighborhood and thinking of causing mischief, namely robbing one of our houses, who do you think he'll pick?

      If you are a pacisivist, I can understand and respect your belifs. I can not share them, because history has shown me time and time again what happens to people who will not defend themselves.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    34. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If it is serious, tell an adult.

      The "adults" at the school want quiet, not justice. They will tell your kid, one way or another, "go away, I'm busy". But you already know that from your own experience, just like I know it from mine.

      At least your kids will learn the valuable lesson that adults give crap advice and don't give a flying fuck when kids get assaulted.

    35. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "What kept the USA and the USSR from destroying this planet?"

      Luck. Sheer luck.

    36. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I agree! My first month in HS really sucked. I was skinny, I wore glasses, and I was a nerd! I got hassled constantly - at first. But the bullying ended, as they learned that I could and did fight back. I didn't win every fight, but I never backed down either. The bullies soon moved to easier targets.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    37. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      If bullies are pushing your kid around, if bullies are beating your kid up ...
      ... they should (1) be expelled permanently* and (2) be prosecuted as adults. That's what would happen to you if you, as an adult, beat up or harrassed another employee at a company you both work for. The same should be done in schools. The "boys will be boys" attitude needs to go.

      *If parents of an expelled student want to get their kid readmitted, they should have to pay for tuition. Perhaps public education should a privilege and not a right (like a driver's license).

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    38. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by tarogue · · Score: 1

      If you are a pacisivist, I can understand and respect your belifs. I can not share them, because history has shown me time and time again what happens to people who will not defend themselves.

      So, you've never heard of Ghandi?

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all. -- Thomas J. Kopp
    39. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      AMEN dude!

      Take these hippies to the hole. :-)

      I hate peace-nuts who tell you that defending yourself from bodily harm is 'bad'. Sure, violence may not solve anything, but at least you're not the only one with a bloody nose after all is said and done.

      I wish I knew where all these pacivists lived. I could conquer them with a spoon and live like a King. (tongue in cheek).

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    40. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by RevMike · · Score: 0

      I only had to do it once... as when the coach was pulling me off him I wispered in his hear that they won't find his body next time...

      I only had to do it once too. Another kid was harassing me, figuring me to be an easy mark. I was in the high school library and he walked up next ot my chair and started threatening me. Still sitting down, I reached up and got the pressure points on each side of his neck with my thumb and middle finger. I squeezed and pulled him down to the ground. As he was writhing in pain I said to him "That is two fingers. I have eight more." Then I let him go.

      It was the coolest moment in my life, especially for a somewhat geeky guy. I'm glad their were witnesses, because that kind of thing is too cool to go unverified.

      In general I didn't have too many bully problems. I was friendly with a whole bunch of big guys. I have a very high pain threshold, so I would wrestle and horse around with these guys, even though I was no match physically. When others in the school see you going toe-to-toe with a guy a foot taller and 75 pounds of muscle bigger, just for fun, they tend to give you some slack - you must be a crazy mofo and your bigger friends might come around .

    41. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      they should (1) be expelled permanently* and (2) be prosecuted as adults.

      On who's word? If three kids are picking on one kid, and that one kid goes to the principal or the police, it is the word of one versus the word of three.

      That's what would happen to you if you, as an adult, beat up or harrassed another employee at a company you both work for.

      Depends on the type of harrassment. I am merciless when one of the white people that I work with comes to work with sunburn.

      The same should be done in schools. The "boys will be boys" attitude needs to go.

      I disagree, boys will be boys, but that is no excuse for predatory behavior. Boys are supposed to rough house with their friends. Boys are supposed to sneak peaks up a girls' skirts.

      Boys are not supposed to victimize people who are weaker than they are.

      One of my cousins, he is 15 now, two years ago while at school saw several people harrassing a girl because she is a muslim. While not a muslim himself, he knew that it was wrong. He stepped in, he defended her, he got into a fight because of it. He got in trouble at school. He got in trouble with his mother. I have never been more proud of him. That is how boys are supposed to be.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    42. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      How does your kids intelligence help him while he's being punched in the face repeatedly?

      I'd rather teach my kids 'self-respect'. Defending oneself is natural, and feels a lot better than getting your ass kicked.

      I'm not saying he should go punching everyone who calls him names, but if he's punched in the face, he should stand up for himself. Sometimes you have no choice.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    43. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      So, you've never heard of Ghandi?

      I knew that was coming. Yes I have heard of him. He's dead. Martin Luther King Jr., dead. See where I'm going with this?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    44. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Luck. Sheer luck.

      No. Rational and healthy fear.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    45. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Dan Straight Man!

      When I was a kid I got picked on a few times. One thing I figured out really quickly was that you could either get your ass kicked or you could get your ass kicked while trying to take the guy kicking it down at the same time.

      A lot of the time you weren't going to be able to affect the outcome (but hey, when are you going to get another chance to take a pop at someone who truly has it coming?) but I'd bet that once you showed others that you would fight you probably got a 70%-80% chance of not having to anytime soon. That was pretty much my experience.

      Plus there's nothing scarier than one of those geeky guys who gets picked on all the time losing it. You know, you can push them, and push them some more, and then push them a little farther and they snap (at least I did) and then they're trying to pummel some guy to death who never saw it coming. Took two teachers to pull me off of a kid when I was in the 9th grade. When geek kids freak out it's scary.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    46. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      On who's word? If three kids are picking on one kid, and that one kid goes to the principal or the police, it is the word of one versus the word of three.
      And this is different in the adult world, how? Do we stop prosecuting adults in similar situations?
      Boys are supposed to rough house with their friends. Boys are supposed to sneak peaks up a girls' skirts. Boys are not supposed to victimize people who are weaker than they are.
      You get the distinction; I get the disinction; the problem is that Joe Sixpack, who is a parent of a bully, doesn't: bullying gets lumped in with the other, more benign behavior.
      While not a muslim himself, he knew that it was wrong. He stepped in, he defended her, he got into a fight because of it. ... I have never been more proud of him.
      That's nice, but his actions are irrelevant to the current topic. It's the several people in your story we're talking about.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    47. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by RevMike · · Score: 1

      If you are a pacisivist, I can understand and respect your belifs. I can not share them, because history has shown me time and time again what happens to people who will not defend themselves.

      So, you've never heard of Ghandi?

      The prinicples of non-violent resistance only work if your opponent is unwilling to face the results of violence against non-violence. The British government and people were unable to stomach the idea of machine-gunning peaceful protesters. At other times in history, others have shown that they are not adverse to killing the defenseless. Had the Nazi or Imperial Japanese regimes controlled India at that time, they would have put Ghandi and his followers up against a wall and shot them. Neither of those regimes showed any reluctance to use brutal force in the Holocaust or the Rape of Nanking.

      Anyone, be they a single bully or a government, who has no fundamental respect for human rights cannot be changed by non-violence. Pacifists are nothing but easy targets. Non-violence is best used to expose hypocracy. People who believe themselves to be good and decent can't stomach violent response to non-violence.

    48. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Sure, violence may not solve anything, but at least you're not the only one with a bloody nose after all is said and done.

      If nothing else, defending yourself against a bully at least teaches the bully that their are consequences for his actions. He may not learn that violence is bad, but at least he learns that he can be on the receiving end of it if he provokes a fight.

    49. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "See where I'm going with this?"

      Uh...no. That MLK and Ghandi should have slung a AK-47 with armor piercing bullets instead of an open hand?

      There is a time for attitude, and then there is not. That might get you something in the short run but not in the long run. I disagree with you but I can understand where you are coming from.

    50. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, defending yourself against a bully at least teaches the bully that their are consequences for his actions. He may not learn that violence is bad, but at least he learns that he can be on the receiving end of it if he provokes a fight.

      Exactly! It's like slapping a dog on the nose when it does something wrong. Bullies aren't much brighter.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
    51. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by caluml · · Score: 1
      I have had sticks, knives and guns pulled on me. I know how to remove those weapons from an attacker and how to immobilize that attacker without use of fatal force

      There must be a link between those two statements, as both have never happened to me or most people I know. Trouble come looking for you or something, does it?

    52. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by darqchild · · Score: 1

      No, actually the logic is quite different, having been put in that situation myself.

      The administration would simply prefer to turn a blind eye to the situation. They simply intimidate the victims into silence.

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    53. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And we wonder why violence is more prevelant among younger children.

      Because they haven't learned about consequences yet. Duh.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    54. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by the_tallman · · Score: 1
      Although it makes me smile to hear about bullies getting some of their own, I would never teach my own children to respond that way.

      Physical revenge may be emotionally satisfying, at least initially. However, I don't think anyone would agree that it is worth it when the bully comes back and makes his own justice with a gun.

      The philosophy of answering violence with violence is the same lame answer that governments use to start wars they can't exit.

      Ivan

      --
      There is no graceful way to eat an egg salad sandwich.
    55. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Would you prefer a generation of spineless wimps? A generation of "yes men" and lackies that fall into whatever line looks the least emberassing or uncomfortable?

      jason

    56. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      You know, reading this thread I was tut-tutting as any good liberal would, then I remembered that my experiences in primary school were exactly the same! Got picked on for being the new kid, from the country, a nerd ... the school bully picked fights with me. It was only after I had shown him that I gave as good as I got that he backed off.

      So perhaps I shouldn't be so quick to judge.

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    57. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If you throw a punch at me, I'm going to try to break your nose. If you pull a knife on me, I'm going to pull a gun on you. If you pull a gun on me, I'm going to shoot you in the face. Most importantly, if you leave me alone. I'll leave you alone.

      And when you try to break their nose, they pull a knife, at which point you pull a gun, at which point they try to shoot you in the face and vice versa. You are not just endorsing an escalation of violonce, you are causing it.

      When I was in school, I would always defend myself if necessary. But I would always try to respond with the exact same force as was used against me. If someone pushed me, I'd push them back to where they were, not try to shove them over. If someone slugged me, I'd slug them back just as hard, but no harder. If they hit me in the chest or stomach I wouldn't aim for their face or crotch.

      I'm still showing them that I can and will defend myself, but I'm not escalating the conflict. Raising the bar of violence simply invites them to raise it again in return. It's a challenge. On the other hand, by not escalating I don't create a situation where they have to strike back harder in order to protect their pride. You've gotten them back for what they did, and given them no reason to respond.

      In this way I was able to defuse practically every fight I was involved in before it became serious. The only time this wasn't the case was when I broke my rule and hit a guy, who was shovivng me around, in the face. Unsurprisingly, he attacked back and we both ended up with bloody and bruised faces, not to mention suspensions.

      Another benefit of my method: it doesn't require you to be able to out-escalate your opponent. If I had let my fights go that way, I would have ended up with a severely kicked ass in most cases. By the time I was capable of really physically defending myself I was a senior in high school and captain of the wrestling team which meant I really didn't have bully problems anymore.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    58. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • We need to start teaching children how to defend themselves. Regardless of school policy, legally you have the right to defend yourself. If bullies are pushing your kid around, if bullies are beating your kid up, give your child the means to defend him/herself. Let your kid know that even if he/she gets in trouble at school for standing up for him/herself, you'll back him/her up.
      This does work, I had the same situation, around 7th grade the bullies decided they wanted to actually start punching me. They were rather shocked when I punched back, hard. The bullies in my school were a bit thick-skulled, it took 13 fights in 2 years, but after that noone would even try to touch me, they didn't want to risk the humiliation of losing a fight to the nerdy guy.

      Oh yeah, and tell your kids if they're defending themselves to do whatever it takes to win, fighting fair doesn't work with bullies. You get a chance to kick them in the groin, do it!

      There is one potential negative, if the school won't support you in the aftermath, you may end up dead. Several times the losers of fights tried gathering up a bunch of friends to attack me after school. The principle was wise to this and met them instead. I seriously doubt I could have won a fight against 7-8 bullies by myself though.

    59. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by FCKGW · · Score: 1

      If it's off school grounds, then the school probably doesn't (and definitely shouldn't) have any authority. Sure, the school getting involved with this issue may have a slightly positive outcome, but then they'd want to start getting their dirty hands into other off-campus issues. "Zero tolerance" usually descends into "zero sense" in the hands of school administration.

      If I were a victim of some bully's website, I would try to go through the parents, and if that doesn't work I'd set up my own site and try to get their webhost to bring theirs down. If that doesn't work, it's DoS time (should be especially easy on most free webhosts with very low transfer limits). Maybe sign them up for some spam. The Internet is the geek's home turf.

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
    60. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to using the Accommodator?

    61. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And parent's who don't look like trash can have a very chilling effect on school administrators. This works especially well if the child is/has been in gifted or whatever other intelligent child program your area may have, as its treated as a disability. Of course, this is also highly dependent on who your parents are, but I had a heinously Bitchy teacher my senior year of high school who was hassling me (I was so incredibly close to dropping out and just entering college, and in hindsight, should have), so my parents, both in suits, came down to the school and had a meeting with principles + teacher. This ended it pretty effectively. Of course, I also had a reputation for getting along wonderfully with all my other teachers. And dirty Nash is a famous Bitch/whore in the area.

    62. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      If an adult is attacked it is socially acceptable for them to defend themselves. The same applies to children too.

      It shouldn't be this way, but this is not a perfect world.

    63. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      I think pacifism is an unattainable ideal.

      Some people have very long fuses, but everyone has a point where their animal instincts will kick in and then they will fight.

      There are a few extremely rare people who will not put up a fight if they are attacked, but would they be able to stand aside if someone attacked their loved ones. I know I wouldn't. If someone tried to hurt my seven year old daughter I would do everything in my power to kill them. Not very civilized but that's human nature.

    64. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      In case you don't remember, Deep Throat, the anonymous informant is the reason why we found out as much as we know about Watergate.

      Hey. I've seen that movie and it didn't mention Watergate once.

      (sorry, i couldn't resist it)

    65. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ghengis Kahn, dead. Hitler, dead. See where I'm going with this? Violence changes nothing.

      In Actuality, your attitude is that of somebody who is weak and a target, and it sounds like you are trying to convince yourself how tough you are as much as us. If you were comfortable with the power in yourself you wouldn't feel the need to be advocating the escalation of violence in public, you would be confident in your ability to diffuse any volatile situation leaving only violence as a last resort. I do NOT advocate non-violence as a means to defeat violent behaviour, as history has shown that it does not often work, but your assertion of "he pulls a knife, I pull a gun" is childish. What if there is no knife? If he only pulls the gun? Are you going to kick his ass then, tough guy? I think you are counting on your "NRA stickers on the windows", your "Vote Freedom First" bumpersticker and your "POW-MIA flag" to do your fighting for you, pussy. Hopefully your image will scare off any potential danger before you have to try to defend yourself. Even your login is an extension of your desperation to be hard.

    66. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I do NOT advocate non-violence as a means to defeat violent behaviour, as history has shown that it does not often work, but your assertion of "he pulls a knife, I pull a gun" is childish. What if there is no knife? If he only pulls the gun? Are you going to kick his ass then, tough guy?

      You apparently didn't read the next sentence in that post. Go read it and then you won't need to ask.

      I think you are counting on your "NRA stickers on the windows", your "Vote Freedom First" bumpersticker and your "POW-MIA flag" to do your fighting for you, pussy. Hopefully your image will scare off any potential danger before you have to try to defend yourself. Even your login is an extension of your desperation to be hard.

      It's so much braver of you to hurl insults from behind your anonymous login.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    67. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think both answers are equally valid in this case.

    68. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatver 'gift' you had, it certainly wasn't in English.

      Parent's? School principles?

      Jesus H. Christ!

    69. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by ifwm · · Score: 1

      And what would YOU do when someone started kicking your ass? Let me guess, you'd read him some Noam Chomsky and sing something from "Hair." God man, why won't you just STFU. I have never started a fight in my life, and I am extremely conflict avoidant, but when someone is kicking your ass you fight back. Period. You don't "solve differences with fights" you prevent assault by self defense. And you're proceeding from a false assumption. Many bullies don't have ANY differences to solve, they just want to hurt someone. What then? "I really think.." SMACK "that we should.." THUMP "talk about this.." FLUSH Right.

    70. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Uh...no. That MLK and Ghandi should have slung a AK-47 with armor piercing bullets instead of an open hand?

      AP is only good if you're trying to get to someone who is inside of a vehicle, or a building or behind some sort of cover. MLK and Ghandi would have been better served if they had soft point hunting ammunition. :D

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    71. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      If someone slugged me, I'd slug them back just as hard, but no harder. If they hit me in the chest or stomach I wouldn't aim for their face or crotch.

      I bet you had to put up with more shit than I did.

      If someone assaults me, I'm not going to try to match his force so that he has a change to come at me harder. I'm going to try to incapacitate him. End of story.

      Another benefit of my method: it doesn't require you to be able to out-escalate your opponent. If I had let my fights go that way, I would have ended up with a severely kicked ass in most cases.

      You have to do what works for you. I did what worked for me. I have no interest in playing tit for tat games with someone who is attacking me.

      Yell at me. Scream at me. Call me names. That's fine. You'll be looking at my back as I walk away. Attempt to harm me, and you will get everything that I can throw at you.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    72. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Yep, but most "geek" guys learn that lesson in Kindergarden! I learned early-on I couldn't just beat-back people...I usually really hurt them, of course getting me in more trouble than the guy who started it! Hence, you learn at an early age to be repressed and just take it so you won't get in trouble for going overboard.

      I think that because of being "broken" at an earlier age, most geeks simply can't stand childish kidding...or the petty bullying that goes on because they have personally already outgrown it. It's also a continued source of being picked on because you just don't "get it" like everybody else does...it just comes off as anoying.

      I notice my middle kid has many of the same issues I did at his age...but he does get along better. The upside is that he won't be getting in many fights after he's 8 or 9. He'll have outgrown it. The downside it trying to find a constructive way to channel that energy into something useful & validating for him, rather than just letting him become bitter and brooding!

    73. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Physical revenge may be emotionally satisfying, at least initially. However, I don't think anyone would agree that it is worth it when the bully comes back and makes his own justice with a gun.

      If this is the case, why is it that all of the school shooters that we hear about are kids who were on the receiving end of bullying?

      The philosophy of answering violence with violence is the same lame answer that governments use to start wars they can't exit.

      What do you propose they do? Give consessions to scum like Saddam Hussein? BS. If someone is determined to cause trouble, the best way to deter them is to let them know that you can give it back just as well.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    74. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and tell your kids if they're defending themselves to do whatever it takes to win, fighting fair doesn't work with bullies. You get a chance to kick them in the groin, do it!

      Kick in the groin. Gouge the eyes. A still punch to the solar plexus. Hell, even biting someone's face are all acceptable ways to prevent serious bodily harm to yourself.

      There is one potential negative, if the school won't support you in the aftermath, you may end up dead.

      Doing nothing is more likely to get you beat to death or sexually assaulted.

      I seriously doubt I could have won a fight against 7-8 bullies by myself though.

      Probably not, but break one or two of their noses and you'll have a chance to run away.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    75. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      have had sticks, knives and guns pulled on me. I know how to remove those weapons from an attacker and how to immobilize that attacker without use of fatal force

      Ah, someone who thinks he's Bruce Lee. Well, goody for you. Your virtue should be readily apparent to anyone staring up at the high ground you've placed yourself on.

      Me, if someone gets violent I pull my .38. If they continue to act violent, I don't take chances - I fire in their general direction and stop when I run out of bullets. Then I reload.

      The safest course is to indeed retreat. If that isn't an option, the second safest course is to kill the fucker. That way you're absolutely assured that they can't hurt you at that moment, nor jump you when you aren't looking at some future point down the road.

      If the loser didn't want to take a fistful of slugs then he should've seen the gun as a signal to back off. Failure to recognize that signal qualifies you for a well-deserved Darwin award.

      I wouldn't, however, risk my life under any circumstances to try to prevent harm to someone who pulled a knife, gun, or baseball bat on me. They do this, they deserve exactly what they get: a plot in the local cemetary.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    76. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll counter with What if the bully doesn't come back, but leaves you alone and picks on someone else instead? Which is more likely, my scenario or yours?

    77. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by syrinx · · Score: 1

      This principle works with world superpowers, it also works with school children.

      Some would say there's not much difference.. :)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    78. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by broohaha · · Score: 1

      You have to do what works for you. I did what worked for me. I have no interest in playing tit for tat games with someone who is attacking me.

      Yell at me. Scream at me. Call me names. That's fine. You'll be looking at my back as I walk away. Attempt to harm me, and you will get everything that I can throw at you.


      Milhouse: "Well, Bart. We've learned that war is not the answer."
      Bart: "Except to America's problems."
      Milhouse: "Amen."

    79. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Vengeance_au · · Score: 1
      /snip/
      Me, if someone gets violent I pull my .38. If they continue to act violent, I don't take chances - I fire in their general direction and stop when I run out of bullets. Then I reload.
      /snip/

      Max
      Max? Aahhhh, Max Payne! The penny drops :)
    80. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I bet you had to put up with more shit than I did.

      I never got shoved around by the same guy twice, if that's what you mean. But you're right, I probably did have to put up with more shit than you.

      If someone assaults me, I'm not going to try to match his force so that he has a change to come at me harder. I'm going to try to incapacitate him. End of story.

      Okay, Ender Wiggins. I'm glad for you that you had that option. If I'd let a fight escalate to that level, I'd just as likely be the one to get incapacitated.

      You have to do what works for you. I did what worked for me. I have no interest in playing tit for tat games with someone who is attacking me.

      If you're talking about being literally attacked, as in someone attempting to do you grievous bodily harm, then yes I agree. At that point you have no choice. We were talking about bullying, though. Bullying doesn't have to end with that kind of violence.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    81. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you're talking about being literally attacked, as in someone attempting to do you grievous bodily harm, then yes I agree. At that point you have no choice. We were talking about bullying, though. Bullying doesn't have to end with that kind of violence.

      Bullying often does include violence. Punching. Slapping. Kicking. Even if I lost, any one of those was enough to earn a bully a good fight.

      Once, on the school bus, round about 4th grade a bully kept slapping the back of my head. I put up with it for two or three days. I walked to his seat and proceeded to kick him in the face. He beat me in that fight, but he never slapped my head again. That was all I wanted. If I had to lose a fight to get it, fine. To this day, (about 20 years later) he always makes a point to say hello to me.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    82. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Hatta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you ever taken any martial arts? If you had you'd know they teach that mental discipline is just as, or more important than physical discipline. The best way to win a fight is to not be in one. Further, martial arts teach self confidence, so when confronted with a bully one does not show weakness. As bullys prey on the weak this is also a good way to avoid outright violence. And in the worst situations, when violence is unavoidable, they teach you how to deal with that too. I encourage all parents to encourage their children to study martial arts, they teach great values and it's a fun way to stay fit.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    83. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they can have one massive nuclear war to make an example of some small country like Gibralter for calling socks the cat an asshat.

      Well, he IS an asshat.

    84. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being a bully or being bullied is less about physicial size and more about attitude.

      I was sure, though, that this was an article about drdink. Biggest bully in the western web.

    85. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Suspensions, hell. Suspensions are the easy side.

      What happens when your kid finds out his school admin has decided this is the time to put that "zero-tolerance" policy into action?

      It's never really zero. Bullies just bully within the rules, because getting away with it is part of the thrill. They aren't afraid, so they can be "smart." The kid who's being bullied, though, is serious about it, and usually ends up being the one to step over the invisible line. Bang. Expelled.

    86. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So, you've never heard of the guy who stood in front of the tank in Tienamen Square?

      Peaceful resistance works great against a relatively civilized power (like Great Britain).

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    87. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by dswan69 · · Score: 1

      Quite right, but not with fighting per se. I was constantly harassed and bullied until one day I'd had enough and someone went a little too far. I helped the central perpetrator have a nasty accident - injuries sufficient to pull him out of an important sporting event for which he had been training for months. As far as I'm concerned the b*stard got away lightly.

      After that there were still the occasional threats and weak attempts at intimidation, but I'd taught them that I was willing to be vicious and ruthless - there was no way for them to know how far I'd really go so no-one ever tried anything again.

      Open fighting is usually out, although one of my friends did eventually smash a bully's face (crushed his nose completely), but fortunately in this case the head of the school knew the injured party was a bully and merely reprimanded my friend. You have to be a little careful in the school system though since its primary purpose is to break and brainwash children - it is its own little police state. My own children have been taught to stand up to bullies, but also not to fight on school grounds, rather take them on elsewhere (ideally find somewhere that you have the advantage) - you ignore them if at all possible, only striking if they attack you, then you take them down quickly and walk away.

      The situation for girls is usually different as there is seldom much physical fighting, it is all vicious verbal attacks - in my opinion verbal abuse is not given its due in the ranks of abuse. My female friends tell me though that finding out the source of the rumours can be done, then you go to that person and explain to them that you are going to hurt them if it happens again - from there you take the same approach as boys.

    88. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you're free to bring your kids up how you see fit, but personally I'd seek not to perpetuate the cycle of violence.

      What would I tell my kids if someone is threatening them? If it's not serious ignore it, laugh it off. If it is serious, tell an adult. Most importantly of all, tell me.

      And what happens when you or an adult is not available? Grin and bear it? I suspect that your kids would trust you all of about once (unless they don't have the wits you hope they'd have). That's about how long it'll take for them to figure out that dad's solution is cowardly and ineffectual. At some point in time in their life, they will be faced with an adversarial situation where there will not be an adult available.

    89. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      That's a fallacious arguement, and I'm guessing you already know that. But I will answer. I live around a large amount of drunken rednecks mixed with wanna be hardcore thugs. I don't look for trouble, but sometimes it walks right up on my front porch.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    90. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Ah, someone who thinks he's Bruce Lee

      no, but I do study Jeet Kune Do.

      Me, if someone gets violent I pull my .38

      and they pull a shotgun, and you pull an uzi, and they pull an AK-47, and you pull ...

      starting to see my point?

      I wouldn't, however, risk my life under any circumstances to try to prevent harm to someone who pulled a knife, gun, or baseball bat on me.

      Maybe you do see my point, I want to live. I might have to break an arm, I might have to shoot someone, or maybe I can just walk away.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    91. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Violence begets violence.

      Pacifisim begets slavery.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    92. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Well, rational fear, and the fact that the USSR couldn't afford to keep lots of their missles in proper working order....

      That's what scares me; if Osama gets his hands on a suitcase nuke, he's not going to hesitate to carve the heart out of a major American city. He doesn't care.

      The Politburo wanted to stay in power. Hard to do when you're dead. The average al-Queda style religious terrorist, however, honestly believes that killing infidels earns them a place in Paradise.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    93. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, defending yourself against a bully at least teaches the bully that their are consequences for his actions. He may not learn that violence is bad, but at least he learns that he can be on the receiving end of it if he provokes a fight.

      Not only that, but bullies like to bully defenseless victims. If you defend yourself, the chance is big that the bully will find another, "easier", victim.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    94. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "And this is different in the adult world, how? Do we stop prosecuting adults in similar situations?"

      Any judge who would allow this to go to trial with he-said she-said testamony the only evidence isn't doing his or her job.

    95. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Any judge who would allow this to go to trial with he-said she-said testamony the only evidence isn't doing his or her job.
      I never said it would be the only evidence. Surely there must be evidence for kids too. The tooth fairy doesn't make it disappear.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    96. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Read again at the thread:

      On who's word? If three kids are picking on one kid, and that one kid goes to the principal or the police, it is the word of one versus the word of three.

      And this is different in the adult world, how? Do we stop prosecuting adults in similar situations?

    97. Re:You're looking at this the wrong way . . . by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      And this is different in the adult world, how? Do we stop prosecuting adults in similar situations?

      In the adult world, the bullies are police officers. We don't prosecute them often.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  6. Invasive Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I find these invasive pictures?

    It sounds goooood!

  7. Nobody picked on me by pegr · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nobody that picked on me had the brains to put up a website! In fact, I didn't gain the respect of the jocks until CompSci class when they would ask me to help with their work. Of course, it was all on Commodore PETS (gawd, I feel old...).

    1. Re:Nobody picked on me by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but anybody with a computer and Front Page can put together a website (albiet a bad one).

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    2. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, but anybody with a computer and Front Page can put together a website (albiet a bad one).

      And the geek can come along and put together a kick-ass site making fun of the dorky Front Page site. ;-)

    3. Re:Nobody picked on me by ebh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right. But this sounds more like a girl thing, where bullying is verbal--rumors, character assassination, etc.

      I was a Scrawny Geek(TM), and I got the bejeezus knocked out of me on a regular basis (until I finally learned how to fight). But when I saw what was done to my female counterparts, I was glad all I had to deal with was getting the occasional beatdown. All an asshole jock could hand me was some humiliation and maybe a trip to the hospital.

      The girls got utterly destroyed, in ways no physical harm could match.

      My theory on this is that from middle through high school, boys form a linear hierarchy of individuals. We're constantly moving up and down on it, usually within a fairly narrow range, within which most boys find their small circle of friends. With few exceptions, each boy is on there somewhere.

      Girls form a hierarchy of groups whose position is fairly fixed. The girls within a group are of roughly equal stature, but there might be one or two leaders. A particular girl is either all the way in or all the way out of a particular group, and some are out of all the groups altogether. Very few boys ever have to deal with that level of alienation (and most of the boys I know who were that far off the hierarchy were off by choice).

      Having never been female, though, that's just speculation; feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

    4. Re:Nobody picked on me by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      Was it really respect? Kids learn early on how to be little fakes. Respect at that age can come only from adults, or self. Self respect like "I respect myself enough that I just failed every single other classmate who took the bio final by blowing the curve, and I dont care what the repurcussions of that are". Not "they like me... they really like me!"

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    5. Re:Nobody picked on me by selfish · · Score: 1

      Heh, I remember the PET! The only thing I recall doing on it, though, is playing some sort of (educational, I assume) game where your character climbed up the ladder on a diving board, and jumped off when you met the goal...

      Sounds kind of lame. (The game, not the PET.) :-)

      Didn't the PET have a cassette player built-in near the keyboard?

      --
      This is not an official Fugazi sig.
    6. Re:Nobody picked on me by liquidsin · · Score: 2, Funny

      My theory on this is that from middle through high school, boys form a linear hierarchy of individuals...

      And you were hassled by bullies, you say? I can't imagine why...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    7. Re:Nobody picked on me by monique · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being female, I took a moment to compare your theory to my high school experiences. The thing is, none of it seemed to apply. My crowd had both male and female members; so did every crowd I can recall. In middle school, I caught some nasty abuse, but in high school, I was unaware of any true bullying. It probably existed, but I wasn't aware of it. There were fights in my high school, but they tended to be between girls fighting over some guy (no, really!).

      Just some random thoughts ...

      --
      -monique
    8. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There were fights in my high school, but they tended to be between girls fighting over some guy (no, really!).

      You didn't happen to get any video, did you? Care to post it for us to... errr... verify your story?

    9. Re:Nobody picked on me by xenoandroid · · Score: 1
      Depends on what school you go to, in my middle school I saw about as many fist fights between two girls as I did two boys and the verbal abuse was strong on both sides (girls bully boys, boys bully boys, girls bully boys, I never saw boys bully girls [in a violent way] though).

    10. Re:Nobody picked on me by Galvatron · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Hmm, I'm not sure I agree that girls and boys form different sorts of hierarchies. I thing male hierarchies are more obvious to the casual observer, perhaps. One thing I would add, however, is the role that "romantic" relationships play in social stature. Examples of women (of all ages) using relationships to raise their stature are rampant. The Right Stuff has an interesting passage detailing how the wives of high ranking officers would act as though their husband's rank applied to themselves. The ordering around of "lower ranking" women got so bad that the Navy started demanding that the wives attend seminars in which they were told that they were not in the military, and hence, had no rank. Men obviously do the same thing, although generally it's based more on appearance than social standard. Psychological studies have shown that men who are paired with attractive women will, in turn, seem more attractive than men who are paired with unattractive women (the study was conducted by showing women altered prom photos, where the man's date was altered).

      Cheapass games had an amusing game a while back called "Love and Marriage," or something similar, where everyone was given a number, and the goal was to pair up with the person of the opposite sex with the highest number. The game had numerous variations, including whether or not your number was public, "divorce" (if you find out that your partner's number is lower than he'd claimed when you were deciding whether to pair up), and whether you won as a couple, or as an individual.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    11. Re:Nobody picked on me by monique · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't =/

      For the record, these girl fights were not pretty. I distinctly remember custodians cleaning blood off of the floor after some girl repeatedly slammed another girl's head into the floor. I don't really want to think about the kind of guy who gets off on teenage girls giving one another brain damage ... although I'm sure there are a few of that type on slashdot!

      --
      -monique
    12. Re:Nobody picked on me by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I agree. Based on my observations from highschool and middle school this holds. Guys talk shit to each others faces and fight, and get it over with, or do nothing. Girls spread rumors and perform brutal character assassination and don't freakin' let it go! I can't count the times I've had the question of "why do you hate $fem_name so much" answered by "Well year before last she.."

      This sort of slander poses a serious problem, though if it's off school campus i'd be more inclined to call the police than the principal. Don't give me that shit about 'telling an adult' either--adults can't watch kids all the time, and when their back is turned you get yours.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    13. Re:Nobody picked on me by pegr · · Score: 1

      The PET was lame as well. I used to love messing with the CompSci teacher (who was also the girl's volleyball coach...). She'd give us an assignment to solve a particular problem (using what we just learned from the book she was only a chapter ahead of us in.. Anyway, my program would be a loop POKEing data from data statements, then a JMP. She tried to bust my chops for using assembly (really machine language) when we were learning BASIC. So I did the same thing again. She tried to bust my chops again. I said (after she ran the program) "Did you LIST the program?" She did. And there it was, my BASIC program that had been POKEed into memory by the first program! (She quickly decided to give me an A and leave me alone in the computer lab. Worked out for everybody!)

    14. Re:Nobody picked on me by jobugeek · · Score: 1

      And any good geek can DDOS their server.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    15. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      >> Having never been female, though, that's just speculation; feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

      Scientific method, I say.

      Just do a transexual surgery and then come with factual evidence. Nothing beats first-hand experience, if you know what I mean... wink, wink, wink...

    16. Re:Nobody picked on me by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Kids learn early on how to be little fakes. ...and then they grow up to be big bullies and fakes, right?

      ...SCO...RIAA...MPAA...Diebold...Lexmark...MicroSo ft...when I saw the headline, "The Rise of Cyber Bullying", I that's what this article was about!

    17. Re:Nobody picked on me by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      I didn't gain the respect of the jocks until CompSci class when they would ask me to help with their work.

      I liked how a friend of mine once put it... "They used to call me a geek and a nerd, now they call me Boss or Sir." hehehe

      -matt

    18. Re:Nobody picked on me by deacent · · Score: 1

      I'd say that girls are less likely than boys to get into physical assault as bullying (as opposed to a personal fight), but it does happen. I know first hand. A real out-and-out asskicking is quite rare. You're more likely to experience more subtle things like stalking, spitting, "accidental" kicking, tripping, or stomping on a foot (that hurts in heels). Once in a while, you'll end up in a hallway without anyone around except a bully (or 5 since they tend to travel in packs), and get pushed down or have your arms twisted and threatened. Oh, the good old days :(

      -Jennifer

    19. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to select the Post Anonymously tickbox, bro.

    20. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, what the f are you talking about. I went to school thinking the same thing, and I'm still getting shit dumped on me by ass clowns in upper management. I have a BS in computer engineering from a top engineering school, and I get less respect from men and women in society than jocks with big muscles on the street still. The guys who get promoted in the company are former frat-boy dickheads. This isn't any different than fucking high school all over again.

      Let me fucking tell you -- Engineering is the biggest let down ever. It used to be that I could sit down, write nice software, or design nice hardware and enjoy the process. But when you get into a multinational corporation doing the same bullshit, but then have restrictions placed on you by people who are not unlike the dickheads who bullied you in school and who have no respect for you whatsoever, it starts to burn the same way it burned in pre-college years. It annoys me enough that I intend to just bypass this bullshit hierarchy, get an MBA, and find a business niche mysel so I don't have to relive high school all over again, in a fucked up corporate, pseudo-professional sense. I have the technical capacity to build the systems that bomb countries and people with pinpoint precision, and I'm still treated like that nerd from high school. Something is very, very wrong.

      Fortunately, over the years, I've gotten enough social skills to make more friends and such, but it's still largely the same forces at work to hold down the classic nerd. The being their boss thing usually doesn't happen, for a classic geek/nerd.

    21. Re:Nobody picked on me by goliard · · Score: 1
      My theory on this is that from middle through high school, boys form a linear hierarchy of individuals. We're constantly moving up and down on it, usually within a fairly narrow range, within which most boys find their small circle of friends. With few exceptions, each boy is on there somewhere. Girls form a hierarchy of groups whose position is fairly fixed. The girls within a group are of roughly equal stature, but there might be one or two leaders. A particular girl is either all the way in or all the way out of a particular group, and some are out of all the groups altogether. Very few boys ever have to deal with that level of alienation (and most of the boys I know who were that far off the hierarchy were off by choice). Having never been female, though, that's just speculation; feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
      As it happens, that's Deborah Tannen's theory in You Just Don't Understand.
      --
      -*- Any technology indistinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced -*-
    22. Re:Nobody picked on me by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a professional dog trainer who keeps a large kennel -- you're very observant, and it works the same way in dogs (and chickens, for that matter) -- where position on the social scale is inherited, NOT made -- and in my observation, equivalent behaviour in humans is likewise more hardwired than learned.

      Back to dogs: Males have a fairly stable linear social order, and will sometimes beat one another up to remind others who belongs where, but that's generally as far as it goes. And every male fits on the ladder somewhere.

      However, females have three distinct social orders, with no significant overlap:

      Alpha -- they KNOW their place in life, they don't have anything to prove, and NO ONE else fucks with them (also, they NEVER fight, not even with each other). In training, they are go-getters who WANT to work (ie. "leaders").

      Beta -- think of a human with "short man's complex", always out to prove how tough they are and always looking for a fight -- these come in several grades (from outright aggressive to sneak-biters), and will fight with each other with full intent to kill (tho whoever is higher on the beta scale ALWAYS wins the fight). In training, they tend to be argumentative and often do the opposite just because they can (sortof a redneck mentality :)

      Nobody -- which are outside the social hierarchy entirely, don't seem to get the social ladder thing at all, and are ignored by all the others -- unless some bored beta discovers that a nobody WILL NOT defend itself, in which case the betas will first pick on, then gang up on, and if not stopped, eventually will kill the nobody. Some nobodies are "natural victims" that seem to attract bullying despite doing nothing "wrong". In training, nobodies are definitely followers, tho commonly have individual bits of genius.

      I've pretty much bred the beta type out of my bloodline, as they're too damn much trouble. However, no one selects against beta behaviour in humans, and it does seem to be more successful "in the wild" (probably because it more ruthlessly pursues its own interests).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:Nobody picked on me by Demolition · · Score: 1

      I saw about as many fist fights between two girls as I did two boys

      You've brought up something that deserves comment (from me, anyway)...

      In my elementary and high school days (20+ years ago), fights were always between two people (whether boys or girls) and never escalated beyond fisticuffs. Usually, after a few mutual knockdowns, everybody ended up as best friends. That's all changed. There were never these massive gang fights that I hear about everyday now. Even more mindboggling, fights today usually involve weapons (everything from rocks to machetes to firearms).

      What the hell is wrong with kids these days?!

      (Hmm, that sounded a lot like what my parents used to say about me. ;-) )

      D.

    24. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many bullies who take pleasure in beating up on a "weaker character" are often inadequate sociopaths.. So be careful you may be revealing something about yourself..

    25. Re:Nobody picked on me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a fucking life, transphobe!

      You haven't a clue as to what it's like living with Gender Identity Disorder.

    26. Re:Nobody picked on me by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      As another female, I agree with the poster, what he says applies greatly. I would have taken an ass-kicking over what happened to me any day.

      It's good that you didn't have to experience bullying in hs. I received tons, and it was the most vicious, demoralizing kind - they'll slut bash you and victimize you verbally, socially ostrasize you, if they can't get you any other way. I did what all bullied kids end up doing, I left that school - a move that saved my life. Also, ANY fight you see is the end result of bullying - it is unresolved conflict that has escalated out of control.

    27. Re:Nobody picked on me by monique · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, how did you leave the school? Graduate early? Transfer to another school?

      I'm just wondering, if you moved to another school, whether the bullying simply stopped.

      I stopped getting shit from other students after junior high, but in that time, I ditched my braces and glasses, made some attempt to dress fashionably (only lasted a year or so), worked on my self-esteem, and made friends with some kids who had transferred in from a different junior high than everyone else. So I don't know if any of those items were factors, or if it was something completely different. Remembering that there was a time when I dressed a certain way just to go with the crowd makes me cringe, but it's the truth.

      --
      -monique
    28. Re:Nobody picked on me by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      Out of curiosity, how did you leave the school? Graduate early? Transfer to another school?

      Speaking for myself, as someone who had to endure the same garbage throughout most of my school life, I simply dropped out when I realized, after research of my own, that I was no longer legally required to attend (I was over the age of 16 and wished like hell they'd told me this before I turned 16). I upgraded later on in adult education, a totally different culture.

      I know friends of mine who taught adult upgrading and can tell from experience exactly why it is they prefer that over teaching in school!

    29. Re:Nobody picked on me by hitchgoat · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna guess that I'm not the only person out there with technical ability who was in a fraternity. You're stereotyping, just like "they" stereotype you. The people who get promoted to upper management in corporations are (usually) the ones with good social and management skills. If they happen to have good technical skills as well, more power to them, but you can't run a business with just technical skills. It's far harder to manage people than software.

    30. Re:Nobody picked on me by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      I transfered to a county vocational school (where i was introduced to technology), and yes the bullying and extreme peer pressure stopped cold. I was finally able to fade into the background and go unnoticed. I find it discouraging that the only safe place for a victim is to have to leave, thus causing even more social rejection.

      My grades shot up almost immediately - truly a move that saved my life. The bullying sadly did still occur on the street when I hung out with 'friends' on the weekends. It took me way too long to figure out that they were never my friends. Self-esteem and sexual harrassment weren't even terms yet, let alone buzzwords. (late 70's, early 80') My parents went to the principal and the police - boys will be boys they said, and the girls? What's the matter? Can't you just get along? I work in schools now, and what disgusts me, is with all of the new safe school laws and education we have in this area, the bullying hasn't stopped, and with these examples of cyber bullying, only shows how it has only gotten more sophisticated.

    31. Re:Nobody picked on me by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      Actually, I almost dropped out too. That was my plan as soon as I was old enough, I spent all of age 15 just waiting so I could turn 16 and drop out. But my parents begged me to try again. They were going to put me in private school but couldn't afford it. I had asked the guidance counselor if I could transfer to this voc school, and they said, no, my grades weren't good enough. Thank God my dad was smarter than that. He called the voc school himself, and found out, because we lived in the county, and there was only one voc school in the county, any resident was eligible to enroll and the town had no say. Can't believe they lied to me. So that's how I got there. Also, it was just a better school and the teachers were a lot nicer - I think that has an effect on the overall attitude of a school. The first one I went to was just a war zone. I saw fist fights, blood everywhere - and other forms of physical bullying enacted on others, almost every day. I was scared to death most of the time. I'm about to rant here: I developed early (big chest, which is #1 on the list of why girls get bullied) and got attacked in the hallway by 4 boys who went on a boob grabbing spree. I hugged my books as close to my chest as I could, but they kept reaching the sides and snapping my bra - 4 of them. I finally screamed and cried and threw my books - all this while kids where passing and teachers were in the hall! The boys just pointed and laughed (they had just committed sexual assault - that's what we would call it today and they would get arrested for it, but we didn't call it that back then). As I was crying and trying to pick up my books, this guy teacher I didn't know said, ok boys, move on. And then he looked down at me with disgust, and said 'get going' Didn't even ask if I was all right! He rolled his eyes and made me feel like I had it coming (yeah, the girl with big boobs, she must deserve it)

      But back to switching schools - there was an article in our local paper about bullying a while back, and a couple of weeks after that some ppl wrote in letters to the editor. They were all about being bullied in school. One was recent, and talked about how she was bullied for two years with kids spreading sexual stories about her that she was sleeping with the Dad of kids she babysat for, and even the teachers were in on it. She then described how the school wouldn't let her switch to a voc school because her grades weren't good enough!!!! It was like my story all over again, only 20 years later - haven't we learned anything????? By the way, they lie, because when a kid leaves for another school, the money follows the kid. And the town now has to take that money and give it to the other school and they don't like to do that. But I believe a students safety should never come down to money or preventing the school from looking bad.

    32. Re:Nobody picked on me by octalgirl · · Score: 1

      Very interesting theory to me. As a female who was bullied greatly, I was clearly a 'nobody' surrounded by a lot of Betas. Yeah, there were a couple of Alphas in there, and I did think that they should have defended me somehow. But I have always felt, when I try to describe what happened, that it was some sort of wolf pack mentality. I have said that (mostly to myself) many times.

    33. Re:Nobody picked on me by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "Wolf pack mentality" is pretty close. Frex, with dogs, if one member of the pack goes down in a spat or even during rough play, ALL the rest (even those not normally inclined to fight) will gang up on the unlucky individual, who usually winds up dead. You can watch the same thing happen on playgrounds, and even with adults in a mob situation. It's hardwired "get rid of the weakest member" behaviour.

      Now that I'm thinking about it, yeah, it does seem that a lot of geeks are social nobodies (in the same sense as happens with dogs). Tho that can be situational too -- where I went to school (large public system), the geeks were the social leaders, and the jocks were the 2nd class citizens.

      And here's something else:

      With dogs, you get more-defined social classes in larger groups: there are social behaviour boundaries at 1, 2, 3, 5-6, 12-15, and over ~25 individuals. If over ~25 dogs in a kennel can SEE one another, and if "GOD" (defined as the human -- note that it cannot be a dog, it has to be "another order of being" -- who is In Charge and will Rake Your Butts for misbehaving) is not present and in immediate control, there will be a LOT more trouble than if they are visually segregated by a solid fence into smaller groups. It's like "there are too many of the other tribe present, so let's kill a few of them, or if we can't get at them, we'll kill a few of our own instead". When you get a few hundred kids on a playground or in the hallways all at once, a situation where there is seldom adequate adult ("GOD") supervision, perhaps this is triggering similar "thin down the pack" behaviour among kids.

      We didn't get much of this where I went to school, but come to think of it, we had a lot of teachers in the halls and on the playgrounds, whenever there were lots of kids present. Kids were never left to pack up unsupervised.

      Dogs are tribal like kids, too -- when I had two different bloodlines, I could not keep them together. A "foreigner" would be quickly identified and ALL the "locals" would gang up on it. When I got a dog from a 3rd bloodline, BOTH the other lines wanted to kill it. Not much different from the "new kid" generally being the butt of abuse from the established tribes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  8. my boss by malus · · Score: 2, Funny

    has been bullying me with email for years. "Communicate with the customer or else!", and that type of thing.

  9. Yet another... by insmod_ex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    scapegoat for parents to blame their kids moronic actions on. "OH NO, HES BEEN CYBER BULLIED, AND WE DIDNT DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!!!" Parents need to take responsibility. GTA is not why your kid is a fucking asshole.

    1. Re:Yet another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Parents need to take responsibility. GTA is not why your kid is a fucking asshole.

      Can someone tell me why old people online are such assholes? My mother got involved in the most crazy group of people from an online Bingo site of all places. Then after awhile she started getting into harder stuff like Yahoo Messenger chats and video. It's fucking crazy what dirty old senior citizens talk about. I thought I stumbled into a teen chat room when I saw what kind of backstabbing dickwads prevail on these places.

    2. Re:Yet another... by insmod_ex · · Score: 1

      LMAO. I'm usually in warez rooms on IRC. No old people there.

    3. Re:Yet another... by LineNoiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's all about lack of accountability. Think about it - in Real Life (tm) if you are an ass hat, people stop associating with you. There is accountability. In the On-Line World (tm), if you are an ass hat, you run the risk of alienating an alias. Worst case scenario - people figure out that RockinSenior78 is a jerk and exclude/ignore him. RockinSenior78 creates a new account NiceOldGuy79 and starts over.

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Yet another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you have real experience with this. Remember, it comes back to ass bite you.

    5. Re:Yet another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't belive how petty you are. What are you, 12? One freakin post, and you think you have to mod bomb me? And now you threaten to keep it up? Get a life loser, I really don't care what you do.

  10. the persistence of boners by Sebastopol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i'm totally at a loss for this one. what could suck more!? every embarassing thing i did in 6th-8th grade now only resides in the distant memory of classmates. i'd probably kill myself if it was part of the internet for ever and ever. (hell, i'm still embarassed by dumbass posts i made to usenet in the 90's!)

    this is a very interesting side-effect of the 'net. i don't know if this can be remedied, but it does imply that children now have accept the possibility of total transparency in their lives. as hard as it is to swallow, maybe this is how the new culture begins...

    i would say i'm glad i'm not her, but this could, in reality, happen to ANYONE. it's just harder to ignore as a child, and it's harder to sue for libel/slander. but still, who to sue?

    gah.

    the transparent society is gonna suck.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    1. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm still embarassed by dumbass posts i made to usenet in the 90's!

      I'm embarrassed by /. posts I made last week! :o)

    2. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compromising pictures? Just call the feds and report them as posessing child pornagraphy...that should put a stop to the problem.

    3. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was always embarassed when I had a persistent boner at school, too.

    4. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better solution would be for the schools to teach classes on respect, tolerance and compassion. It's pretty obvious that a lot of parents aren't teaching their kids these important ideas, and it leads to long term societal problems.

      The solution is education not legislation. Isn't that what schools are for?

    5. Re:the persistence of boners by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Compromising pictures

      They didn't say nude pictures!!! The kid picking its nose or doing other weird stuff is very embarrassing too. At this age, pretty much everything is embarrassing!

    6. Re:the persistence of boners by Chibi · · Score: 1
      this is a very interesting side-effect of the 'net. i don't know if this can be remedied, but it does imply that children now have accept the possibility of total transparency in their lives. as hard as it is to swallow, maybe this is how the new culture begins...


      We'll see. No real facts to back up this opinion, but I have a feeling that the popular kids won't be targeted as strongly as kids that are traditionally picked on. While there might be some level of hidden anymosity and actions taken against those who are higher on the social totem pole, those on the lower rungs will alwasys be targeted.

      Take a look at it this way, some kids might get picked on because they are fat. Suddenly, someone takes a picture of them online and posts it, adding the insightful comment, "This guy is so fat!" Then, you have some of his bonehead friends adding comments, just to look cool. Etc, etc.

      Looks like it's suddenly become a lot harder to be a kid. Glad I didn't have to go through anything like this (although I was relatively free of verbal and physical abuse in my school days).

      From another perspective, compare this to the dot-com boom. People tried to put everything on the web, and it failed. Certain things just didn't make sense. Now, the web is catching on, because traditional business models are making their way online, and processes are being streamlined. Same thing is happening with this teasing. It's becoming more efficient. And while you might have some blips of more popular people being teased, for the most part, the biggest targets will be the traditional ones.

      Heh, I just had this horrible image of someone taking the time to create an templated, automatic bully-site. You could include pictures, etc. It would be kind of like Scott Pakin's automatic complaint generator, but I think not really in a spirit of fun, but with more ill will.

      Geez, I'm suddenly wishing technology would start slowing down a bit... the medical field constantly faces ethicial issues and dilemmas... I'm starting to see it more and more in the tech field...

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    7. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article:

      "compromising photos of students in school locker rooms or rest rooms"

      I am guessing that that would include nude or semi-nude pictures. Stuff like picking your nose is not all that embarassing unless you are the homecoming queen. A pick with your drawers around you ankles and a squinting face is a little bit more embarassing.

    8. Re:the persistence of boners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, I know, I should have RTFA! Damn!

    9. Re:the persistence of boners by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to sound like a pessimist, but kids don't usually apply "lessons" all that well, they apply exapmles. The teacher can talk about tolerance and compassion till he or she is blue in the face, if what the kids see is parents being intolerant, and other kids having no compassion then the lessons are useless.

    10. Re:the persistence of boners by lederen · · Score: 1
      Heh, I just had this horrible image of someone taking the time to create an templated, automatic bully-site. You could include pictures, etc. It would be kind of like Scott Pakin's automatic complaint generator, but I think not really in a spirit of fun, but with more ill will.

      Just wait... Some day your kids, falling victims of this exact concept, will schmoogle the topic and suddenly realise who originally invented the concept... At that exact point you'll understand the meaning of true poetry...

    11. Re:the persistence of boners by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In "real" terms, it's impossible to remedy. Any kid who is determined enough will always be able to put abusive material on the Internet. Worse, with the simplicity of most tools, these days, that material need not be genuine. Anybody with Paintshop Pro or Photoshop can edit a photograph, for example.


      In practical terms, there are no technical solutions, but there are solutions nonetheless. It is somewhat rare that a kid is abusive for no reason, and the two most common reasons are a disturbed family and being sufficiently different from other kids that it's vital to them to obscure those differences.


      The first problem can be solved, but it requires that the family unit as a whole recognises that it's up shit creek, and needs to make some adjustments. The kid's behaviour, in this specific case, is merely a symptom. You've got to treat the disease, if you want to make a difference.


      The second problem requires more teachers and smaller classes. Improving the ratio of adults to kids will allow for better attention to what is going on and why. It also allows greater understanding of the kids, which would allow for better organization, and therefore less alienation.


      Beyond those two steps, I really don't think anything can be done. Suing won't help, it might even make things worse. (Gives the kid who is sued a bigger audience, for a start.)


      You can't do nothing, but virtually everything that you can do is potentially disasterous. There are no easy answers, even if there are plenty of easy questions.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    12. Re:the persistence of boners by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      ... i'm still embarassed by dumbass posts i made to usenet in the 90's! ... i don't know if this can be remedied ...
      Yes it can. See here and here.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    13. Re:the persistence of boners by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      i'd probably kill myself if it was part of the internet for ever and ever.

      Well, fortunately web sites aren't forever since the web space has to be paid for, to be kept up. Even free sites like Geocities destroy the accounts after a period of non usage, and the web sites go forgotten.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    14. Re:the persistence of boners by Talinom · · Score: 1

      It is somewhat rare that a kid is abusive for no reason, and the two most common reasons are a disturbed family and being sufficiently different from other kids that it's vital to them to obscure those differences.

      You missed one. I cannot find the article that was here on Slashdot some time ago, however it dealth with the social hierarchies that are built in school and how the typical geek just doesn't care what people think about them to bother changing their opinions. The "popular" crowd, however, is obsessed with being at the top of the social ladder.

      Being at the top, the popular people can intermingle with anyone at any rank or in any crowd (jock, geek, rich, poor, etc) and not risk having their place on the ladder disturbed. It is those people that are just slightly above the bottom that use abuse, slander, and violence to prevent themselves from being dropped to the bottom. They are the people that you need to watch out for when you are in school.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    15. Re: the persistence of boners by gidds · · Score: 1
      IMO, the trouble is that kids can't naturally empathise with others. Empathy seems to be a skill that's picked up gradually, and quite late (if at all).

      I found it much easier to deal (in hindsight) with the (mostly verbal) abuse I suffered at school when I realised this. In most cases, the kids concerned didn't actually hate me in the way I used to think; they just didn't know what they were doing to me (and didn't care enough to find out). Hanlon's Razor applies, I guess.

      I don't think empathy is something you can teach; it either comes naturally to you, or it doesn't. If it doesn't, then you have to put some effort into it, and most people don't bother. You can probably teach the need for it, but I doubt that those who most need to learn the lesson will do so.

      Anyway, is it me, or is putting a huge number of kids together, in a high-pressure environment with few adults, little room and nowhere to escape to, a poor way to teach them compassion, empathy, and other social skills?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    16. Re:the persistence of boners by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      Well, fortunately web sites aren't forever

      You are forgetting about archive.org.

      As an example, here is my class schedule from the fall semester of my sophomore year.

      That account has been gone for years, yet the content lives on in the archive.

    17. Re:the persistence of boners by Threni · · Score: 1

      >In "real" terms, it's impossible to remedy. Any kid who is determined enough will always
      >be able to put abusive material on the Internet.

      This is a good thing.No more `just telling tales`. If someone gets physically hurt, there's a good chance its by the person/people responsible for creating the website, or sending the SMS messages. Now there's proper, permanent evidence when someone is harassing someone. Nice, easy lawsuits, lots of money for the victims, and it'll be easy to knock up a few laws outlooking certain methods of victimization, making it even easier to prosecute/punish the bullies.

    18. Re:the persistence of boners by incog8723 · · Score: 1

      In "real" terms, it's impossible to remedy.

      Then you say,

      In practical terms, there are no technical solutions, but there are solutions nonetheless.

      My guess is this poster is just listening to himself talk, kinda like me.

    19. Re:the persistence of boners by jbayes · · Score: 1

      I get email all the time about how to have a persistent boner. I'm not quite sure, though, what that has to do with bullying.

      --

      "It sure was strange to see something on Usenet about me that didn't involve Klingon gang rape." -- Wil Wheaton

  11. If I see by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    anyone posting AC here I'm gonna kick your ass, I know who you are and you better have your lunch money with you tomorrow.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:If I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead and try it. Bitch.

    2. Re:If I see by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      +5 Black Dragon Scale Mail, +4 Fireproof boots of levitation +5 Fireproof cloak of magic resistance +5 Rustproof Helm of Brilliance +4 Gauntlets of Dexterity +5 Fireproof Hawaiian T-shirt AC: -28

    3. Re:If I see by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
      With a base AC of 10 shouldn't that work out to a total AC of -14?

      Heh. I guess I'm going to get beaten up after work today ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    4. Re:If I see by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      You're right ... I forgot about that. Been awhile since I went down those tunnels.

    5. Re:If I see by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      I hear you, brother. The amount of AD&D rules I've forgotten just goes to show how much better my life has gotten since high school :)

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    6. Re:If I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just listening to that conversation leaves no doubt in my mind that you both probably received +5 Ass Beatings in high school.

  12. Gimme your lunch money! by digital_milo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess we've found yet another use for micropayments.

  13. I got in trouble by AndreyF · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got in trouble for bullying when I told a kid I had a trojan on his computer and had more access to it than he did (I was bsing) :)

  14. Funny that... by Leebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    My little brother's website (which includes photos and comments sections) was spammed pretty bad by a member of a rival football team.

    My the profanities! I'm thinking of making Apache redirect to goatse.cx the next time someone comes back from the offender's /24.

    1. Re:Funny that... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And redirect everyone from that ISP to goatse? Also, if that bully finds the goatse shit, he'll say your little brother is a fag. You can't fight back - unless you actually try to WinNuke everyone from that /24 who visits your site...

    2. Re:Funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm thinking of making Apache redirect to goatse.cx the next time someone comes back from the offender's /24

      Even better - make it do it the first time, then not for the next 5 times, and then randomly after that..

      So when he goes to show someone else, they'll look at him like he's lost his marbles.. then he'll check again :o)

    3. Re:Funny that... by leerpm · · Score: 1

      From this moment forth, I declare this type of attack to be referred to as Belkin/Goatse Attack.

    4. Re:Funny that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, if the other fellow is a minor, that might actually be a felony under whatever anti-cybersquatting law congress passed :/

    5. Re:Funny that... by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      A member of a rival football team.

      Geez, some people need to get lives.

  15. Camera phones by zapp · · Score: 1

    I know ever since camera phones/pdas came out the first thing that came to my mind is taking a picture of every cute girl that walked by :)

    You could look all professional on your pda and secretly snapping pictures of her butt. Sure it's not ethical, but when technology makes it so easy... :)

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Camera phones by Mukaikubo · · Score: 1

      Why the butt when a simple bit of sleight of hand will get you up the skirt?

    2. Re:Camera phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was the japanese that had those kind of fetishes.

    3. Re:Camera phones by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      To me, the camera phone is so stupid I wonder why anyone would want one. Thanks to you, I understand.

    4. Re:Camera phones by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      Why is it not ethical? If she didn't want people to see her butt she should have worn a more loose garment or just stayed at home.

    5. Re:Camera phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we all know that they're just asking to be raped and insulted too. It's a proven fact. *Sigh*

    6. Re:Camera phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, this was a problem even *before* camera phones.

      Several times, while on the train from Connecticut down into NYC, I've spotted adults (mostly males) taking digital photographs of teenagers (mostly females) on the subway without their knowledge.

      (On the occasions when I've had a camera myself, [I'm basically just a broadway-going tourist.] I'd take a picture of Mr. Perv in action. [Poetic Justice, I think.])

      And whether I've had a camera on me or not, I've always made a point of coming up to them somewhere in Grand Central and letting them know that I saw what they were doing, [have pictures of it, if I had a camera,] that it would be a Bad Idea (tm) to ever do it again, and that they really should get some help before they wind up in jail.

      It's fun watching a junior grade pedophile turn sheet-white in public. Really.

    7. Re:Camera phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the first thing that came to my mind is taking a picture of every cute girl that walked by


      You're not the only one. (NSFW)

    8. Re:Camera phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't mention anything other than looking...you, my AC friend, are the one who's taking things to extremes.

  16. about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid being a computer geek was half the reason one got bullied -- not the method of bullying!

    the geeks win!

    1. Re:about time! by garwain · · Score: 1

      For me, being the computer geek was caused a bit of bullying, but that stopped quickly when I joined the wrestling team, and quickly took a gold medal for the heavyweight category in a regional tournement.

  17. At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're not getting the shit kicked out of them anymore.

    Being bullied is getting pushed down a flight of stairs, not getting an anonymous text message about how dopey your shoes look. Sheesh.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    1. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      They're not getting the shit kicked out of them anymore.

      Actually as a kid I would've far preferred to get the shit beat out of me than the psychological torture I was put through as a child by my "peers". Physical beatings heal, but emotional and psychological beatings can last a lifetime. I'm still screwed up almost 15 years later. Fucking teenagers. These popular kids that get shot at school deserve what they get.

    2. Re:At least... by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. I got a lot of snide comments and puts downs in elementary and middle school, but I would hardly consider that at the same level as actually getting beat up.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    3. Re:At least... by bhtooefr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, but "sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me" doesn't hold true. Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse. BTW, I didn't think SMS was anon - I thought it'd give you the phone number (there are many services that WILL send anon SMS, though - just over the internet)

    4. Re:At least... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. This shit is just over-sensitized, ridalin fed, drama-queen bullshit. These kids need a good old fashioned Burt Reynolds style ass-whooping to understand what bullying is. What happened to writing, "For a good time call 555-1212" on the bathroom walls after finding some asshats phone number somewhere? That was bullying. This isn't bullying.

      "How many guys did you have sex with?" What the fuck? You think that's bullying? I'm sorry, but having that written on the blackboard before your class is much worse, and I've seen that. That guy didn't cry, he chuckled and asked who wanted to hook up with him.

      Just keep taking your valium, ridalin, and talking to your therapist while I spend your social security!

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    5. Re:At least... by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      everyone on slashdot's got a bully story, be it on one side or the other. i'd like to hope that most people would find physical abuse only a shadow of what a good mind game can do, but now i'm wondering how likely that is. as a high schooler, i'd have rather been slugged in the arm a few dozen times rather than have my shoes made fun of. no one's ever suggested where bullying stops and assault begins, though.

      how many of you parents taught your kids how to fight? and how many taught your kids how to block, but not fight? and how many of you just dont condone any of that? i wanna know how the 2003 slice rates up.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    6. Re:At least... by McSpew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, it's been shown that psychological pain causes the exact same portion of the brain to react as from physical pain. In other words, your brain can't tell the difference. And let's face it: Physical trauma (up to a point), doesn't leave the lasting emotional pain that psychological trauma can.

      And you can stand up to a bully who's threatening you physically and get him to leave you alone (at least, it worked that way for me when I was in 7th grade). How do you stop anonymous rumors and character assassination?

    7. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They only last if you let them. Learn to ignore it. And yes, it *can* be ignored, and it *can* be dealt with at that age. I managed it, and those freaks were merciless to me. But after a while they get tired of it, and move on.

      Just takes willpower, which kids today are not being trained to use or improve.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    8. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when you constantly get text messages about how they are going to push you down a flight of stairs?

      Sidenote: I was probably the smallest kid in the whole year when I went to secondary school. Some kids a year or two older than me tried to bully me, and I stood up for myself. I got in a couple of fights, but they laid off after that. It seems like I've never heard a bullying story where the kid stands up for himself from the beginning and things turn out badly.

    9. Re:At least... by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

      Informative and insightful? You don't think psychological bullying can ruin someone for the rest of their life? I knew a kid (as in, he was in my class and I knew him personally) in my elementary school (grade 7, there's no junior high where I live) who almost committed suicide because of the bullying! But no physical contact, so I guess it wasn't REALLY bullying after all!

      How would you like to feel like the scum of the earth, like you had no reason to live anymore because everyone hated you, because you had no redeeming qualities and everyone knew it? You start to believe stuff when you are always hearing it.

    10. Re:At least... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being bullied is getting pushed down a flight of stairs, not getting an anonymous text message about how dopey your shoes look. Sheesh.

      No.

      Clearly you weren't one of the kids who got called "Fatty fat fat fatass" every day in junior high school... if you had been, you'd know the kind of lasting damage that words can cause.

      PS Your shoes look dopey.

    11. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Learn to ignore it? Since when is the burden of responsibility on the victim of bullying? Do you have any idea how high suicide rates are among victims of bullying? Kids should not have to deal with it. Most of them can't.

    12. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are suicide rates among bullying victims (a lot of them with no phsyical contact) so high? What kind of asshole thinks that kids need to be tought what, "real" bullying is? Twelve year olds should NOT have to deal with this.

      You have problems, asshole. Sick ones.

    13. Re:At least... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

      how many of you parents taught your kids how to fight? and how many taught your kids how to block, but not fight? and how many of you just dont condone any of that? i wanna know how the 2003 slice rates up.

      I know that, with the advent of zero-tolerance, even 'blocking' is considered fighting and grounds for suspension/expulsion. It's to a point where the victim can be half-dead and in a coma and still the administrator can only wring his/her hands, say that s/he has no leeway, that it's School Policy, and that the victim must also be given a three-day suspension (but it can be appealled).

      I wouldn't be surprised if this "zero tolerance" extended to cyber-bullying ("You know, Johnny, you also contributed by leaving this E-mail Address out for anyone to find, plus you didn't patch your computer system....")

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    14. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no doubt that physical abuse is a problem, but emotional abuse is also a problem, and to say otherwise is to expose one's ignorance.

      Your argument amounts to saying that theft isn't a crime because murder is worse. The logic is blatantly faulty.

      Just because you know one guy who laughed something off, doesn't mean everyone has that same capacity. Some people are more sensitive than others. Just saying they should "get over it" is ignorant.

    15. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      I thought the short-range broadcast stuff was anon. Mebbe I'm thinking of a different protocol or something...

      And yeah, it does hold true. The kids in this article aint got nothin on what I went through, and what a lot of people here probably went through, both physically and mentally.

      It's a hell of a lot easier to ignore a spoken word than a moving fist.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    16. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      You let them think whatever they want to think, cos they're gonna do that anyway. A month later it'll all be forgotten, kids have the attention spans of gnats.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    17. Re:At least... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I'll take arguing with you on Slashdot, and you flaming me, and perhaps you making a complete jackass out of me, way over you pummeling me and putting me in the hospital.

      Verbal abuse can be unpleasant, and even damaging to someone, but to equate it to physical abuse makes me think you've never had the shit kicked out of you as a kid.

      I got both at various times of my life, and let me tell you: you can laugh off what some jerk says. You can even go home and have a cry. But a permanent limp and blindness in one eye last forever. (Both of which happened to a friend of mine who just wasn't popular, the latter being caused in large part by what other kids thought of the former).

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    18. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was overweight by quite a bit, and I was called all sorts of things until the gits realised it wasn't making any kind of impact, at which point they moved on to the next poor fat slob. I was also the Trekkie geek loser target. I also played AD&D. And read books.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    19. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was never a problem for me. I was a scrawny kid growing up, but I was tall and quick. Whenever I would get picked on, I always fought back. I quickly learned how to take down guys twice my size, and during my K-12 years I put probably a half-dozen guys in the hospital with broken noses, broken jaws, missing teeth and cracked ribs. In addition my father was the type to emphasize that I should fight back, or else I would be forever tormented. None of this bullshit Tae Kwan Do or Jujitsu, I mean just leaning how to break someone's nose with a quick uppercut, or to incapacitate with a blow to the solar plexus, how to do a full-nelson, etc. I also learned how to box and wrestle. Now, I was still a nerd. I was smart, got excellent grades, but I was never picked on. I was the only really "nerdy" kid who was friends with most of the Varsity football team because they knew they couldn't mess with me. And believe me, some had tried and failed. The bottom line is, parents need to teach their kids to not be such little pussies. Fucking kick some ass if you're pissed. Even if it means suspension from school, teach them that you wouldn't care if they got in trouble. Hell, I got so pissed in my junior year of high school I took a 4 inch hunting knife in an ankle-holster to school. Got good and expelled, too. My parents didn't care. I finished out my years with private tutors. Now I more successful than 99% of my graduating class. One of the bullies that picked on me once, he is now bagging groceries for a living. Kids today are little pussies.

    20. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should have considered eating less? Working out, perhaps? Nah, it's easier to whine and complain about how it's other people's fault.

    21. Re:At least... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      So next time we're arguing, and I shoot some holes in your logic, and begin to make you feel like an ass over it, you'd prefer if I just instead kicked in your ribs, or maybe gave you a coupla black eyes?

      Didn't think so.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    22. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is that? If you let *other people* decide whether you're worth a shit or not, you're pretty much getting what you deserve.

      No, I don't think psychological bullying is a big deal. But then, I got so much of it I learned to ignore it at an early age.

      Suicide was certainly not an option. If someone didn't like me, tough shit.

      Kids need to learn not to roll over and pucker south at the first sign of trauma. They're better than what their peers think of them. Guaranteed.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    23. Re:At least... by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      ohhh
      want a tissue?
      teasing has been going on for centuries...if you raise your children to be confident and self assured and give them sources of pride they will get over it.
      babying them, holding their hands and punishing the teasers is the silly way out. kids need to be raised..one of the amazing things about our world is that you can make fun of people...and that people are not obligated to like or even be nice to you. gotta learn sometime.

    24. Re:At least... by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but "sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me" doesn't hold true.

      I agree with you %100 sir! Walking away doesn't stop the insults, now instead of insulting you to your face they will insult you behind your back until you're out of audio range (sometimes accompanied by the flying spitball or wadded up paper towel).

    25. Re:At least... by ecklesweb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL...you've never had good beating, have you?

    26. Re:At least... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      haha. I can either hit you in the head with an axe, or call you bad names. pick one.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:At least... by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

      It gets hammered into their heads... and they're just kids! Grade 7 is TWELVE FUCKING YEARS OLD! They don't have the mental tools to deal with it!

      Oh, of course, those kids who commit suicide deserved it. They could've handled it, if they just tried. Listen to yourself. The first sign of trauma is a month at school. He lasted until almost the end of the year.

      Of course they're better than what their peers think of them... but they don't know it, because they're having the opposite hammered into their heads constantly.

    28. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should explore a problem before spouting out armchair doctor garbage? Nah, it's easier to make a snap decision based on a couple lines of text than to truly try to help someone.

    29. Re:At least... by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
      Well I'm 24 and getting married next year, so the kids haven't started rolling in yet, but I'll chime in anyways.

      My dad never "taught me to fight" in an organized way, but we wrestled, boxed (gloves usually on), had armwrestling & pushup competitions with each other (the bastard never let me win, but he teased me with it), and I also have 3 little brothers (and we still beat all hell out of each other on a regular basis). Little league, pickup basketball at the rec center after school, and high school sports all helped immensely.

      I'm looking forward to having kids. I think they'll learn confidence and self-defense skills just like I did: practice. No serious ass-beatings you understand, just old-fashioned rounds of "toss each other around the living room until Mom gets the hose out," and the game ends laughing. To me, it seems incredibly important to get little kids out & about while they're young to set good habits. TV/computer are fine after dinner, but while the sun's up, they should be out playing with other kids and gaining skills in areas that you can't get any other way.

    30. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent Post Cliff's Notes: "I turned out okay, according to me. There are no problems that can't be solved by being me."

    31. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your one story makes all of the suicide statistics just go away. Grow up.

      Of course, you're exaggerating anyway.

    32. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not blaming them for him being overweight, he's blaming them for harrassing him about it. Think black people in the fifties. Do you think they should've learned to deal with it?

    33. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Hi there. Non sequitur, anyone? Check with the AC.

      I never said they went away or shouldn't count, asshat. Learn to read.

      Any kid that commits suicide from being verbally abused was indeed a victim - a victim of abysmal parenting, not verbal abuse.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    34. Re:At least... by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
      The notable sentence:
      Now I more successful than 99% of my graduating class.
    35. Re:At least... by RighteousFunby · · Score: 1
      Clearly you weren't one of the kids who got called "Fatty fat fat fatass" every day in junior high school... if you had been, you'd know the kind of lasting damage that words can cause.


      Right the fuck on.

      If you're fat, for some reason you have given your authority to be beaten senseless or (as detailed in parent) insulted. I can't understand why this is not a crime and why it is not prosecuted in the same way as racism, sexism and homophobia. All those things are harassment because of a single unchangeable part of you, and although being overweight is still changeable I don't see why it is legal to make fun of that.

      Or, in short, mod the fucking parent up OR ELSE :)
    36. Re:At least... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was the one who got called "Four eyes", "NerdBoy", "Dorkface". No, it wasn't pleasant, but I just called them "Neanderthals" and similar insults. I just didn't let that bother me. *glances down at shoes*

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    37. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ignoring the verbal bully makes the bully go away."

      No, it doesn't. And anyone who thinks kids should be free to MAKE OTHER KIDS KILL THEMSELVES without consequence deserves to have their house broken into multiple times while the police tell you to learn to deal with it. Oh, you were fat, and you went through this. Well times changed, asshole

    38. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Sigh. Another armchair psychologist with all the answers. Except the right ones.

      Hey. Where are the parents in your dreary little self-righteous speech there? That's right, non-existent. And that's the problem. "TWELVE FUCKING YEAR OLD" kids are being left to twist in the wind by their dope-smoking SUV-driving power-lunching parents.

      Heh, you're whimpering at the wrong person about suicide. You want to know what I think about suicide? Can your fluttery stomach handle it? Here it is: Yeah, any kid that commits suicide deserved it. Because that's the coward's way out. That's the idiot's way out. What the fuck, you throw away your LIFE because someone laughs at you, and you don't call that fucking stupid?

      Oh well. Mod me down, -5 Insensitive Git. Maybe if you screw your eyes up and hope real hard, you can pretend that it hurts me. But I learned how to slough that crap off a *long* time ago.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    39. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't attack the argument, so you find a diversion. You lost.

      " a victim of abysmal parenting, not verbal abuse."

      Right. No verbal abuse going on. Do you even listen to yourself? Half of the school making fun of you constantly, joking about you while you're in earshot (you see, it's funny to them even if you ignore it, which you can't, because you're barely a teenager), and the other half ignoring you. That's not abuse, of course not!

    40. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Ok, for the weak-minded twit, I'll answer this much of your post: B&E has got nothing to do with this, it's a bad analogy. So stuff it.

      The rest of it you'll just have to twist in the wind over. Sucks, doesn't it?

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    41. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      You didn't provide an argument to attack. You just made some bullshit up that had nothing to do with the post you replied to.

      *You* are the loser, my small-minded padawan.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    42. Re:At least... by dreadnougat · · Score: 1

      Kids are dying, and you don't think it's fair to stop the people who are driving them to it.

      "Hey. Where are the parents in your dreary little self-righteous speech there? That's right, non-existent. And that's the problem. "TWELVE FUCKING YEAR OLD" kids are being left to twist in the wind by their dope-smoking SUV-driving power-lunching parents."

      That has no basis in any facts - but you acuse me of being an armchair psychologist.

      "What the fuck, you throw away your LIFE because someone laughs at you, and you don't call that fucking stupid?"

      I call that desperate. The right choice? No. But then, why don't we let kids vote? Clearly, we don't trust them to make the right decision.

      But go ahead and bite a bullet. Concede defeat the roundabout way.

    43. Re:At least... by Yakko · · Score: 1
      people are not obligated to like or even be nice to you

      So, this rule is fairly applied, I take? At least where you come from, it sure seems like no one can get in trouble for being mean to others.

      I always got in trouble for being mean back to those who were mean to me, and those people never got in trouble. Ah... "Life's not fair" is the lesson to be learned here. "People suck" is a sub-lesson of this.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    44. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a direct comparison. Since you're obviously an intellectual midget, I'll explain how it works. You see, you, the property owner, can't deal with break ins on your own. You can't be around your house all the time, and you can't afford to hire a security firm. It's beyond your control, but the police tell you to just deal with it.

      Now imagine your a little kid who just moved to a new school. You have never been bullied before. You have no idea how to deal with constant harrasment from everyone who's willing to look at you. You don't have any friends after school either, because you just moved. You're afraid to tell your parents, because you think it's your fault that you can't handle it. You tell a teacher, and they tell you to deal with it.

    45. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonna have to disagree here. Just "ignoring" it doesn't do anything. Sure, it might cut down on the teasing somewhat if you don't fight back, but ignoring comments only really works if you're one of the cool kids or at least have one other person to laugh at the bull(y/ies) with you. Being one of about a half-dozen white kids in my almost entirely hispanic grade school (and the ONLY one in my grade) combined with being the "smart" kid got the living shit teased out of me from the time I was six pretty much until I graduated. It was bad enough that I had to put up with boring-as-hell classes, but being alternately mocked and snubbed made a good chunk of grade school pretty close to a living hell for me. Now, I'm not saying there weren't any positive side effects to this (I know what it's like to be a minority, for instance) but in my mind, they're outweighed by the bad ones (massive self-respect issues that lasted for years, finding it impossible to believe that anyone could find me attractive, et cetera).
      I must admit, sometimes I wish me now (age 20, with at least a facade of cocky self-confidence and pretty damn attractive if the reaction of men I meet is any indication) could go back to me then just so I could beat the living shit out of those damn kids.

    46. Re:At least... by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      Twelve year olds should NOT have to deal with this.

      "There's the way it oughtta be, and there's the way it is."

      I don't remember who said it, but it's a great thing to keep in mind. No, a 12 year old should not have to deal with this stuff, but they do have to deal with it. They have had to deal with bullying for thousands of years, and will continue to have to deal with it for thousands more. Bitching about how it's done won't help anyone, neither will outlawing the methods. Kids are inventive, especially when it comes to being cruel. Teaching these bullied kids how to deal with it will help.

      I put up with it as a kid. I was ostracized, bullied, and had rumors spread constantly. I was beat up by groups of kids until I figured out how to defend myself (well, I grew 4 inches and gained 20 pounds over one summer, that kinda helped). It bothered me a lot, but I eventually learned how to deal with it and that knowledge made me a better person. Because guess what? I deal with assholes today, too, just like 15 years ago. I expect to deal with them 15 years from now. Putting up with those kids back then trained me for today.

      Kids have to learn how to deal with bullies, not have the bullies swept away by authority figures in their lives. I've seen the difference in other people who dealt with them in the latter manner.

      Anyway, I know that's not the real thrust of your post, the comment just caught my eye. And I've just gotta echo what was said before:

      WTF???? One of the REASONS I got picked on was for using computers a lot! Now the bullies use them to pick on kids??? CRAP.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    47. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you get the memo? It's the 21st Century. Nothing is anybody's fault anymore, except for maybe conservative Christians.

    48. Re:At least... by Yakko · · Score: 1
      OK, Professor... how does one get "taught how to deal with it" when not only are the kids and teachers at school doing this shit, but your parents do the same when you get home? What now, little man? Ignore everyone?

      I'm all for the "ignore the fuckchops" method of dealing with it, but there're some folks whom you can't really ignore.

      --

      --
      Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
    49. Re:At least... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      No, a 12 year old should not have to deal with this stuff, but they do have to deal with it.

      Why not? It's not a big deal. It's a big deal because everybody is telling them it's a big deal and it's wrong. Welcome to life, it's not fair, but you can get off at any time.

      Because guess what? I deal with assholes today, too, just like 15 years ago. I expect to deal with them 15 years from now. Putting up with those kids back then trained me for today.

      Exactly. Removing bullying from schools will just make people less apt to deal with bullying when the faculty doesn't exist.

      The most important lessons to learn take place before you are 18. One of the biggest is that there is always someone who can beat your ass. Maybe in tech, maybe in fighting, maybe in both. Deal with it.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    50. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sorry, but "sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me" doesn't hold true. Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse.
      Broken bones heal within weeks. Terror and isolation can cause lifelong damage.

      One police self-defense instructor uses a gedanken experiment to show why you should fight back and risk physical injury rather than surrender and get pushed around.
      First, try to recall the worst physical pain you've ever had. Finger caught in a door? Burn? Try to recapture the flavor and intensity of it. You can't.
      Next, think about the most shameful, humiliating episode of your life. You're blowing fuses already, aren't you?

      Verbal abuse (as opposed to teasing) isn't "just as bad as physical abuse", it's worse.

    51. Re:At least... by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      My point was simply that having to put up with assholes is a bad thing. The world would be better if we were all nice to each other, stopped war and poverty, had good skin, and smelled like roses. And I had a lot of money.

      The fact that there are assholes means that we need to learn to deal with them effectively, and the earlier we do, the better.

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    52. Re:At least... by HBI · · Score: 1

      A stern ass kicking.

      Seriously.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    53. Re:At least... by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      My point was simply that having to put up with assholes is a bad thing. The world would be better if we were all nice to each other, stopped war and poverty, had good skin, and smelled like roses. And I had a lot of money.

      I just disagree that it's a bad thing. Assholes are inherent in the system. Not dealing with assholes will leave you ill-prepared for several other categories important moments in life.

      The fact that there are assholes means that we need to learn to deal with them effectively, and the earlier we do, the better.

      I just have to blame these kids' parents. The parents are saying, "Don't deal with it." That's dangerous.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    54. Re:At least... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      I had that "willpower" that you speak of. I was a tiny kid, I weighed only 115 lb when I got into high school, by the time I left I had gained a bit more... but being the tiny reclusive kid didn't help. By the end of high school, I had one of the sharpest tongues in school. I didn't "zing" or "burn" people, I just downright insulted their intelligence at every oppurtunity (it was often, IIRC).

      Now, I look back and wonder about just how stupid I was. There's one thing about ignoring the bullying, but it's entirely different if you let the "ignoring" become "hardening." Those that are strong will resist the wind, but those that are hard will shatter in the wind.

      It helped a lot that I was in completely advanced classes, and participated in band and whatnot. I did make a few friends that were not the jock or bully types, and they have remained good friends even after graduation and all of college. I've got a lot that I wish to apologize for, however, because in being so waspish I had become just the verbal form of them.

      I sometimes wonder what my high school reunion will be like, and whether or not I will revert back to my old attitudes once I'm confronted with the people of the past.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    55. Re:At least... by SkarTisu · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can ignore the bullying. What you learn by doing that is that you can just suck things up, and people who pick on you learn that you have no spine. Formula for a postal worker.

      --
      rm -fr /bin/laden
    56. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you raise your children to be confident and self assured and give them sources of pride they will get over it.

      Well, my blue collar parents didn't. They taught me to be obedient and respectful of authority, not creative or, gasp, self-confident.

      Check out the book Limbo: Blue-Collar Roots, White-Collar Dreams to find out how the values of blue collar families ill-serve their children trying to make it in the white collar world.

    57. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you stop anonymous rumors and character assassination?
      with anonymous warnings and real assassinations
      kidding

    58. Re:At least... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      Well said.

      To be honest, I'd rather have been kicked half to death than do through the emotional shit that school bullies imposed.

      It hurt for a long time, more than a few broken bones would've...

    59. Re:At least... by Talinom · · Score: 1

      It was previously covered here last month. The original article was rather interesting.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    60. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to ignore it. And yes, it *can* be ignored

      I thought I was good at ignoring shit like this. After 3 years of crap I switched high schools. In the new school I had no problems until one day for no apparent reason someone started to verbally abuse me over and over again. I snapped and literally threw the guy accross the room and almost proceeded to beat his face in until a bunch of people held me back. I guess that three years of ignoring it all came out at once.

    61. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Ok, one last waste of time on you:

      The only ones responsible for a child's suicide are his or her parents, for not teaching them how to deal with adversity. Yeah, suicide is terrible, but once a person has made that decision they have already given up. They are losers at that point. And that is FAR from necessary.

      "That has no basis in any facts"

      The fact is that parents dont give a shit about their children any more - they would prefer to let the lawyers clean up... after the fact.

      "But go ahead and bite a bullet. Concede defeat the roundabout way."

      Sarcasm noted. WTF. This is exactly my point, moron. And you *are* an armchair psychologist. Wake up and get a clue that you aren't doing anyone a bit of good by letting your heart bleed all over the goddamn place. You want to make a difference? Huh? You really want to make a fucking difference!? Educate the parents. Go right to the source, don't fuck off and waste time treating the symptoms.

      BTW, thanks for adding me to your "enemy list", I'm sure that'll do a fuckload of good. Should counteract all those pathetic parents and their desperate children and do a whole WORLD of good. Don't you feel better already?

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    62. Re:At least... by JPelorat · · Score: 1

      Ooo, insults, that's good, press your argument the only way you know how.

      Just for that, you can figure out the answer on your own. You obviously don't need *me* to help with that.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    63. Re:At least... by dbretton · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's been shown that psychological pain causes the exact same portion of the brain to react as from physical pain. In other words, your brain can't tell the difference.

      Last time I checked, calling someone a "Big fucking fat-ass" did not result in anyone going to the hospital.

      Bully: Hey kid, you're a fat little stenchy fucker!
      Boy falls to ground, lifeless

      Sticks and stones...

    64. Re:At least... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Luckily the worst thing a brain dead administrator can do is suspend someone. Your 'permanent record' is not so permanent once you graduate. Given a choice between telling my kid to allow himself to be beaten to a pulp or to do whatever he can to prevent it, I'll choose the latter, no matter what some zero common sense school policy says. Seriously, suspensions in school are so common now that nobody cares anymore.

    65. Re:At least... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      You better stop now, you'll make the poor AC the next teenage suicide victim.

    66. Re:At least... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      No, you wouldn't have. If you had ever had a good beating, you'd know just how wrong you are. Physical trauma is accompanied by emotional trauma as well (what will the other kids think, how can i show my face, why me, am i a bad person because this guy hates me etc) Emotional trauma is only emotional, and while that part is just as bad, it's only one type compared with both for physical abuse. You think kids who get beaten aren't scarred for life? Think again.

    67. Re:At least... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      As a mental health professional dealing with trauma in children (which I think makes me qualified) I call bullshit. You're wrong about the brain thing and you're wrong about physical trauma not leaving a lasting impression.

      Physical abuse has a physical AND emotional component. Emotional abuse is only emotional. Why is that so difficult for people to understand.

    68. Re:At least... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to me that you comment on discrimination, and have the word "NIGGA" in your sig. By the way racism, sexism, and homophobia are all protected speech. So is calling you a fatty fat fatass. Only in very limited cases (workplace, while committing a REAL crime) does discrimination become prosecutable.

    69. Re:At least... by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse

      You're probably right; but that's no excuse for never learning to grow a thick skin.

    70. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They only last if you let them. Learn to ignore it. And yes, it *can* be ignored, and it *can* be dealt with at that age.

      What kind of bully did you suffer at school? Friends laughing at you cause you spilt a cup at tea time, after the rowing classes? Your bulliers clearly were PUSSIES.

      Now, compare that to my little brother. He ignored them, and them proceeded to change strategies: from calling him fatty 30 times a minute to spitting at him, trying to make him fall on athletism (while running, in case you can't believe it), etc. Now, those are real bullies.

      So, what did you say about how ignoring works with that people? Pffff.

    71. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring the verbal bully makes the bully go away.

      You are so utopic I can't help picturing you as a teddy bear typing on a keyboard.

    72. Re:At least... by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      Teasing is one thing, and "it happens to all of us", but going out of one's way to make another person's life a living hell is another. The odd verbal jab here and there is something we all have to learn to deal with. Conflict is a part of life, but as a child, it should not escalate to the point where it gets in the way of one's life.

      It's raising children with a false dichotomy to pat children on the back and say "ooh that is just a part of life" when they bully others as children, and yet toss them in jail or get them fired for the same conduct as an adult.

      Try pulling that crap at work as an adult and see how long one remains an employee.

    73. Re:At least... by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      I've actually had both happen to me. As an adult raising children, I still struggle with confidence issues, although the passage of time allows it to be less and less. For a child, the struggle can seem overwhelming. At times, the insults and threats that are drip fed to the child on a daily basis can acquire the appearance of being true, because the numbers and the constancy of it last for a seemingly long time.

      It takes a great deal of strength to come out of that atmosphere with a full emotional deck, but it is possible.

    74. Re:At least... by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      Broken bones heal within weeks. Terror and isolation can cause lifelong damage.

      Please don't underestimate the damage of physical abuse. It may be a whole other kind of abuse, but it is accompanied by emotional damage as well. In fact, it takes emotional damage to the next level, because it is based on emotional abuse.

      Putting abuse in little boxes and categorizing it is pointless. If it is damaging, it is damaging, period. It interferes with healthy, natural growth either way.

      If I were to make my home atmosphere equivalent to that of some of the garbage I had to deal with in a school atmosphere, you'd better believe social services would be at my door in a snap with foster parents waiting to take my children under their wing.

    75. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e. Verbal abuse is just as bad as physical abuse

      Having been the victim of both (and dished out a bit) I can tell you that physical abuse is almost always worse.

      Physical abuse is mental abuse worse than Verbal abuse ever could be.

    76. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teasing has been going on for centuries...if you raise your children to be confident and self assured and give them sources of pride they will get over it.

      Looking at your posting history, you might just be a troll, but there are people out there who seriously hold this viewpoint. It's true, that teasing will always go on but it goes way to far in schools (American public schools at least) and it would be stopped if teachers really tried. But they have the same old "teasing has been going on for centuries" excuse so they don't. Then when a kid comes to school with an AK and starts killing people they wonder "how it could be stopped". DUH.

      Yes, teasing will happen, but it should be punished. When school becomes a living hell for a student rather than a learning environment it is society as well as that student who loses out.

    77. Re:At least... by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      "And you can stand up to a bully who's threatening you physically and get him to leave you alone (at least, it worked that way for me when I was in 7th grade). How do you stop anonymous rumors and character assassination?"

      Standing up to a bully was not always a guarantee that it would stop though, especially if said bully was part of a popular crowd and you didn't happen to be popular.

      Also, standing up at the wrong place and wrong time got me in more trouble and made me less likely to be believed when people seriously hurt me. Having someone witness you in the act of defending yourself, without that person knowing your history of the person you are pounding on (having previously abused you for years) can get you the reputation of someone who "does it themselves, therefore they deserve what they get". Thus, they make their chances of having anyone be on their side slim to none.

    78. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the strongest survive in nature. Earth is overpopulated anyhow- I say suicide is a good thing.

    79. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not merely an insensitive git. Rather, you're an insensitive asshole.

      Even concerned parents are characteristically adherent to a ubiquitous misapprehension: these individuals believe that school administrators are experienced professionals capable of rendering assistance. Unfortunately, they aren't. "Your child isn't properly adjusted," they speculate. "We recommend that you consult a psychiatrist."

      Perhaps the psychiatrist establishes a prescription for medication in a futile attempt to mitigate an incipient depression. Alternately, perhaps your child is temporarily committed to a mental institution, often encountering individuals similar to the bullies.

      The school administration, of course, remains apathetic. Meanwhile, your child is subjected to severe emotional and physical trauma as they are committed to solitary confinement and denied access to proper nourishment. They are permitted to contact neither friends nor relatives. Their parents visit twice weekly.

      Upon their return to school, the teachers never attempt to suppress the child's visit to an institution. "It should be an open experience," they insist. Instead, your child receives incessant harassment. Perhaps the medication renders a side effect of fatigue. Your child consistently falls asleep during class.

      Of course, your child was previously instructed to "inform a teacher of any incidents that may transpire." Your child does. Instead of acknowledging the legitimate complaints, however, the school administration queries the aggressor.

      "[Your child] is a liar," the aggressor insists. "Little Jimmy wouldn't ever harass another child," believe two blatantly mistaken parents. And the aggressor has successfully circumvented "the system." His lies are accepted as inalienable truths. Your child, after all, possesses the clinical affliction. Your child, after all, is obviously melodramatic.

      The school administration responds by performing a behavioral evaluation. Inexperienced and insufficiently qualified "educators" commit their observations to a folder, which is typically orange. Your deviant offspring then becomes responsible for the transporation of this folder. He is evaluated daily.

      And, during a physical confrontation, the witnesses are often students. They are certainly willing to defend the bully. Thus, your child becomes "the aggressor." And because these "blatant aggressors" are typically incapable of maintaining a "passing grade" subsequent to their "life experience" (or become altogether apathetic), otherwise intelligent children become victims of "special education." They remain dependent upon medication for years afterward.

      Welcome to The Real World, your ignorance.

    80. Re:At least... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That was truly...

      Retarded.

      And you wasted time typing that? Awesome.

  18. Savy teachers by zymano · · Score: 1

    More savy WWW web knowledgable teachers will get a handle on this. It's just a matter of time. How about a parent just instant messaging the teacher ?

    1. Re:Savy teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers never could stop bullying when it wasn't on the web.

      When you're picked on, you can't just tell a teacher. That only makes things worse.

      At least when bullying was offline, it happened face to face--we could at least try to "save face" with a comeback or simply ignoring the bully and letting everybody know we don't care.

      But online bullying is like a silent shame that we can never face up to

    2. Re:Savy teachers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...like a silent shame...

      You mean like a Social Disease? Oh wait, that's a secret shame...

  19. School Policies??? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The article suggests many tips for combating the problem - chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies."

    Am I the only one who sees a problem with giving schools control over students' lives beyond campus grounds? Why is it that some people are so quick to abdicate control and responsibility of their children to a government beaurocracy? Are today's parents really that bad? Is the government that eager to monitor/regulate every aspect of our lives?

    It's time for people to stop blaming the school system and making out kids the taxpayers' problem. If your kid is a fuck-up, be a goddamned parent and put them in their place! Stop automatically run crying to the government!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:School Policies??? by Shagg · · Score: 1

      "The article suggests many tips for combating the problem - chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies."

      Am I the only one who sees a problem with giving schools control over students' lives beyond campus grounds?


      I was wondering the same thing. My first thought on seeing the above quote was... How does this have anything to do with a school?

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    2. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it's the fuck-ups doing the bullying. How do you put someone else's kid in their place if it's your kid that's being bullied?

    3. Re:School Policies??? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you read the fine print of my high school's computer policy, the rules apply at home too (and they're extremely draconian - no games?!?!? no pr0n, no hacking, educational use only, bla bla bla...)

    4. Re:School Policies??? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Ok, how? See often the parents of bullies are jerks themselves, or just don't care. Ok, so if they won't discpline their kid what do you do? Beat the crap out of the kid? Well sure, that would probably work, and land you in jail. Or I guess you could call the cops, which would use even MORE of the taxpayers money, tie up the police on piddly shit, not to mention be a little harsh for just childhood bullying.

      Well, that means the only real feasable avenue left is the school. They can punish the kid, even if the parents are unwilling, but not give them a criminal record and tie up the courts in the process.

    5. Re:School Policies??? by marcop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "specific school policies" != "beyond campus grounds". I agree with you that policies that extend beyond campus grounds are overboard and unenforceable. However, I don't have a problem with schools making policies for student conduct on school premises. Read the "extreme" BBC article. Besides the web site, this girl was harrassed on school premises. The school should have a non-tolerant policy for on-school harrassment. Expell the students who conduct in this behavior. By forcing abusive students to stay at home, parents will have to deal with the problem instead of the schools.

    6. Re:School Policies??? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      It's time for people to stop blaming the school system and making out kids the taxpayers' problem. If your kid is a fuck-up, be a goddamned parent and put them in their place! Stop automatically run crying to the government!

      The problem is that when the government requires that you offload your kids for 8 hours a day to a school, the parent is no longer in total control. Sure, you can raise your kids well, but kids will be kids. If corporations are legally responsible for the behavior of its employees at work (think: harassment, racism, etc.) then schools should also be held accountable for the behavior of its students. With accountability comes responsibility -- to make sure the environment is safe for everyone.

      This doesn't absolve parents of responsibility, but it does add a layer of protection for children who lack the emotional maturity of adults(*) when dealing with these types of situations. Parents are still responsible for raising their kids properly, though it's rather unfortunate that there's no accountability for parents who do a lousy job of it. Bad parenting isn't a crime... though the results of that bad parenting can lead to crimes.

      (*) Of course, it's somewhat debatable whether many adults possess such maturity...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:School Policies??? by multiOSfreak · · Score: 1
      Why is it that some people are so quick to abdicate control and responsibility of their children to a government beaurocracy?

      And furthermore, people should realize that schools have enough to do managing their bastard kids while they're on school grounds. They don't have the time or resources to find out what they're up to when they're off campus.

      It's time for people to stop blaming the school system and making out kids the taxpayers' problem. If your kid is a fuck-up, be a goddamned parent and put them in their place!

      Amen to that! Any bullying going on should be done by the parents to their rat bastard kids.
    8. Re:School Policies??? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who sees a problem with giving schools control over students' lives beyond campus grounds?

      Hrm, I read it as implying that this would be the case for private schools. Public schools are a whole different issue. Many private schools do in fact have rules that control students lives beyond campus grounds, however, the students have a choice - accept the rules, or don't come here. That's well within the school's rights.

      Now public schools are a completely different issue. However, it could be trivial for the school to become involved (suppose the kid creates the website using the school computer lab?)

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    9. Re:School Policies??? by Other · · Score: 1
      Are today's parents really that bad?
      Today's parents are always eager to let the government or some other standards group dictate what is right for their children. Web site blockers, movie/video game/tv ratings, schools teaching sex education. Letting the school try to invade extracurricular activities in an attempt to "safeguard" their children doesn't seem that out of place here.
    10. Re:School Policies??? by dema · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are today's parents really that bad? Is the government that eager to monitor/regulate every aspect of our lives?

      Yes, and yes. I'm not saying I don't agree that it is pathetic, but it is the fact of the matter. All through high school binge drinking (keyword: binge) was a HUGE thing in this lovely little Wisconsin town. And the worse part about all of it was that parents are well aware of this, and in some cases even supply beer to their children. Parents are that bad, and they would be glad to blame the school to not make it their problem. It's sad, but true.

    11. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Schools need to be a place where kids can feel safe. The parents obviously aren't stopping it, and the police can't deal with it in most cases (a waste of money, you'd say, anyway).

      Who deals with it? Oh! I know! Leave it all alone until the kid is mentally destroyed for the rest of his or her life! Or better yet, wait until the kid brings his parents handgun to school and starts killing people!

    12. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      file charges of harasment; or maybe

      get a bat and go fix the problem!

    13. Re:School Policies??? by garyrich · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Public schools do not have that power and it would take major draconian big-brother lawmaking to give them that power. I know that many schools have policies that they think control the students off the school grounds - but those are totally unenforcable. The only way they get that power is with parents consent. If the parents do not explicitly consent, they are SOL

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    14. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea, if they can find time to fit in, oh say...education...in that grand scheme, you let me know.

    15. Re:School Policies??? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who sees a problem with giving schools control over students' lives beyond campus grounds?

      No, but much of this activity does happen on school grounds, sometimes using school equipment. For those cases the school does need to establish specific policies.

      Another questin to ponder. If a picture is taken on school property but published "off campus" on a web site, does/should the school have some recourse?

    16. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, having kids is great if you get to teach them only when you want to. See, most parents like a little "me" time, so consequently they never really have time to teach kids anything. They didn't have kids just so they could teach them. Most people I know have kids either accidentally or so they can have indentured slaves and the eventual care when they get Alzheimers. In that respect, yes, I think it should be up to the schools. If they can teach math and science and such, why can't they include social skills in the mix?

    17. Re:School Policies??? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Along those same lines, most workplaces are required by law to provide a safe, harrasment-free workplace. Especially those that are overseen or run by a government agency. Should a public school be held any less responsible with regard to the students?

      I know here, if someone was harrassing others about weight or sexual orientation, they'd be fired pretty quickly or the employer is the one with their wallet in the legal sling.

    18. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... violence only begets violence if you're not doing it right?

    19. Re:School Policies??? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, private schools do.

      When my fiancee's little sister just started High School, it had draconian rules and it was Catholic. I was shown the "rules" that every parent/guardian must read and sign. Under the list for expulsions was the following (paraphrased):

      1. Any student that gets an abortion
      2. Any student that aids another student in getting an abortion
      3. Any student that has heard of, or knows of another student that has gotten an abortion and fails to notify the school authorities.

      Not only to they try to enforce their rules on students off campus, they also force the students to snitch on each other was well. Funny thing is, the rules for drugs/alcohol were not as draconian: only the user/supplier was punished and only if it was on school grounds.

      As for public schools, the rules should be simple:

      If a student can be punished for making a website critical of the school, a teacher, or the school policies on non-school equipment on non-school time and on non-school servers, then the school should also punish the bullies for attacking one of their students. Quite frequently the former happens, but rarely the latter.

      Victims are really in a sorry state when they are tormented by the bullies and then the school permits the torment by not doing anything. When victims lash out (like in Columbine) their situation gets even worse since the schools then treat all the victims as if they were potential terrorists. I'm pretty sure every ostracized kid in every school in the US was watched very carefully by the schools thereafter.

      Perhaps the bullies tend to get jobs as school administrators?

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    20. Re:School Policies??? by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      My experience is just the opposite to what you just wrote.

      I'm a parent, I know lots of other parents. I don't want the government or any other group to dictate what is right for my children and I don't know any parents who do.

      Like I said, parents wanting the government to dictate anything about their children has just not been my experience.

    21. Re:School Policies??? by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Insightful


      School teachers should spend their time teaching, not babysitting. I think that mandatory school attendance is stupid. If kids don't want to show up at school, then that is their parents fault. Rowdy, misbehaving kids are ruining the education of the kids who WANT to learn. Let the bullies and truants skip school, commit petty crimes, grow up without a high school education, and end up in jail.

    22. Re:School Policies??? by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      Or I guess you could call the cops, which would ... be a little harsh for just childhood bullying.
      It should be harsh. If it were extremely harsh (permanent expulsion, mandatory jailtime), then its effect as a deterrent would increase to the point (hopefully) where nobody would bully any more. When bullies learn that they're not just going to go to bed without dinner, maybe things will get better.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    23. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chemical makeup of the average teenage brain has yet to achieve the balance necessary to fully comprehend the concept of "cause and effect" - thus draconian punishments will only deter those developed enough to already behave themselves with the threat of more minor punishments. In other words, you can only get so far with just a stick and no carrot.

    24. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. It SHOULD NOT be the schools or goverments responsibility. But sadly yes there are MANY really poor parents who really do not rase they're kids. It's just sad. If we are at a situation where the kid is not tought what is right and wrong or any values at all for that matter, there HAS TO BE some system to control that thease bullys don't make other peoples lives hard or at worst destroy the lives compleatly.

      PS. Greetings from Finnland 1 095 suicides last year. With a population of 5million, one of the highest percentage of the world.

    25. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta solution. Make everything illegal, punishable by death.

    26. Re:School Policies??? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Are today's parents really that bad? Is the government that eager to monitor/regulate every aspect of our lives?

      Yes and no. Schools don't want jurisdiction over this sort of thing. It's just another hassle for them. I'd blame parents, who find it easier to make it the school's problem rather than try and deal with it themselves. I'll grant that it's a hard problem to deal with, but showing your kids how to deal with hard problems is much better than showing your kids how to pawn problems off on anyone remotely involved.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    27. Re:School Policies??? by deacent · · Score: 1

      Along those same lines, most workplaces are required by law to provide a safe, harrasment-free workplace. Especially those that are overseen or run by a government agency. Should a public school be held any less responsible with regard to the students?

      And there's the rub. If the school expels a student (or even suspends them), you can bet the parents of that student will be in the principals office screaming about how the school was way out of line. Fearing a lawsuit, a lot of schools will allow the student to return the next day. And the cycle begins again with the bully now knowing that there will be little to no consequences.

      -Jennifer

    28. Re:School Policies??? by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Hummmmmm. Interesting theory. I would comment immediately, but I haven't thought out what yet....

      This could increase the scaricity of a High school diploma.

      jason

    29. Re:School Policies??? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that education might not be the solution, but a lack of education is an anti-solution. If you aren't educated, you can't see the value of an education. Hence, you're required to go to school until you're 18, and then you can fuck off and be a loser and be incarcerated.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:School Policies??? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      This could increase the scaricity of a High school diploma.

      Thus increasing the value of a high school diploma for students who don't drop out. Suddenly, "high school diploma required" actually means something.

    31. Re:School Policies??? by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      but the truant's parents presumably understand the value of an education. And why must other students get LESS education time (and more time being bullied) because the teacher is playing truant officer and baby sitter for the bad kids?

    32. Re:School Policies??? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      I do. The school has no business whatsoever attempting to usurp my parental rights. Off campus grounds, *my* rules apply. What the school thinks about my rules is irrelevant.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    33. Re:School Policies??? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Or ship 'em off to the prison camps! Hell, better yet, into the incinerators for them all! That'll teach 'em to act up.

      Schools try to cram everyone into the same-shaped slot, which is obviously BAD. But parents seem to think of school as some kind of daycare. And it shouldn't be. Maybe they should care about their kids a bit more and pay attention to their schooling. But either way, schools have to assume some responsibility for these parents' kids in their absence.

      Remember, kids that age can't think for themselves. Or, at least, that's what they're told.

    34. Re:School Policies??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somtimes the paperwork to do it "right" is just not working. Violence is very well understood by those that use it to "bully." It's easy to give and hard to take when it's "given" back! Makes one think before acting on stupid basic emotions.

    35. Re:School Policies??? by dr_db · · Score: 1

      It's time for people to stop blaming the school system and making out kids the taxpayers' problem. If your kid is a fuck-up, be a goddamned parent and put them in their place! Stop automatically run crying to the government!

      I would love to. However, when speaking to them doesn't work, what do you do - if I thump one of my kids to the ground to screaming, throwing shit at me, lying, stealing - they go crying to the government and basically you are fucked.

      I have been more of the negotiator in the family, but I have been seriously tempted (and felt it was warranted) at times to simply kick some ass - after all, that's what happened if I got out of line. I did tell them that if they *ever* called social services, they better hope they come quick because I am going to beat on their asses until the police arrive.

    36. Re:School Policies??? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think in general you can find someone who will further your education if you are willing to do the looking yourself. If you want additional education you can generally get an instructor to help you out. It is unfortunate that some people have to suffer because of the actions of assholes - my school career suffered horribly because it was a horribly oppressive environment. But, given what those people were like to me having been in school, I shudder to think about how they would behave the rest of their lives without at least a high school education.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. It won't be long... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    until bullies beat our kids up for Paypal passwords.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  21. Technology changes nothing by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Technology only provides a comms tool. What's the difference if kids text eachother or pass notes? Write "Tammy is easy" on the boy's room wall or a web page? If anything the computer based comms makes it easier to trace and clamp down on.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Technology changes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technology only provides a comms tool. What's the difference if kids text eachother or pass notes? Write "Tammy is easy" on the boy's room wall or a web page? If anything the computer based comms makes it easier to trace and clamp down on.

      "Tammy is easy"

      You're right. Cut and paste makes the difference. Plus no marker mess on hands.

    2. Re:Technology changes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about having it follow you around 24/7, from many different people? No difference?

    3. Re:Technology changes nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the difference is that it's not only the janitor reading it, but everyone with net access. So do you have something to hide? Better hope it doesn't get on the net, there won't be any janitor cleaning it up.

    4. Re:Technology changes nothing by rworne · · Score: 1
      Technology only provides a comms tool. What's the difference if kids text eachother or pass notes? Write "Tammy is easy" on the boy's room wall or a web page? If anything the computer based comms makes it easier to trace and clamp down on.


      Funny you mention this. I don't know how you can text message in certain school districts because in quite a few here in the US, cellphones/pagers and all are considered drug paraphenalia and subject the possessor to expulsion under zero-tolerance rules.

      The problem with the web vs. the bathroom wall is that "Tammy" only hears rumors about the message from her peers and has the custodial staff remove the message (or she can do it herself). If it's on the web, it's there in her face and nothing she can do will get the offensive text removed without a big fuss: TOS violations, legal processes all take time. If the website is somehow untouchable it adds to the feeling of helplessness. She may never know who the attacker is, but the attacker will likely know that an attempt to shut the site down occurred leaving them with little doubt as to whom it was supplying them with more ammo for their next "update".

      Perhaps Tammy should study up on DDoS attacks.
      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    5. Re:Technology changes nothing by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
      You miss my point. For most kids, it is going to be a lot easier to gain access to a marker and anonymously write on the boys' room wall than it is to post a web page anonymously.

      Bullying is a socail problem, not a technology problem. There are laws that govern stalking, harrassment etc that can be equally applied to sending text messages or written notes.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    6. Re:Technology changes nothing by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      I would like to meet this "Tammy" to determine if she is as easy as you say.

  22. It's a problem here on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are constantly ganging up on people like Vladinator and Hanzosan, driving real life bullying and threats, and driving users away from slashdot.

  23. Simple solution by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    This sort of thing is being done by little geeky kids probably right? Ok, great, get some REAL bullies to track them down and beat the snot out of them. That'll teach 'em!

    Seriously though, things like this just prove that in basically any group, you'll have bullies. Even if you take all the geeks and seperate them, bullies will emerge from the geeks.

    1. Re:Simple solution by climberkid · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily the geeks. With things like geocities and automated stuff like that, it could be anyone. Right?

  24. This is what happens... by Popadopolis · · Score: 1
    This is what happens when technology like this is simplified enough so the type of people who use it maliciously can use it so on the people who will grow up to invent things like it. God knows that (most) of the bullies arent smart enough to make things like that or code or be clever at all.

    my post is a grammatical nightmare

    1. Re:This is what happens... by herulach · · Score: 0

      I found exactly the opposite, i got loads more trouble from the more intelligent bullies at school, the dim ones are easy, a reasonable amount of wit or a bit of sarcasm can usually confuse them enough to be embarress them. I found it was the verbal abuse from people about the same intelligence as me that hurt the most. Physical bullying wasnt much of a prob though, suspect cos im a reasonably large (as in well built, not as in sysadmin) kind of guy.

    2. Re:This is what happens... by Popadopolis · · Score: 1

      I guess I just didnt run into smart bullies then. Back in elementary school, I was one of five actually intelligent kids. We were the people who went to the library and read the books on what ammounts to high school biology and we were the ones who knew the basic programming languages by the forth grade (i, unfortunatly, have not really bothered to learn the more advanced ones yet, but I will get around to it). There wasnt anyone smart against us. Hell, us smart people had to work together to survive against those who didnt value knowledge.

    3. Re:This is what happens... by herulach · · Score: 0

      Youve never met anyone whos tried to use their intelligence against you? That sounds like something out of AD&D, but you know what i mean, in my experience theres a significant minority of inteligent people who are basically just dicks, but then, i suppose theres also a significant minority of peolpe in general that are. I found the trick was being able to tell the difference. And wtf? you had a library in your elementary school? I didnt go anywhere with a decent library till, ooh, year 8/9 best we had before that was the district Library Van, basically a load of books in the back of a transit done up like a library. Had a nice collection of clarke and asimov though, well, after i pestered the woman that ran it to get me some. Belive the first copy of Lord of the Rings i read came from there.

    4. Re:This is what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that you have to be stupid in order to be malicious, though it does help to have a very narrow view of what actions are in your own self interest.

    5. Re:This is what happens... by Popadopolis · · Score: 1
      At elementary school I didnt meet anyone who used intelligence against me, but I have conflicted with people like that since, especially in junior high school. But the school was huge and we basically kept to ourselves.

      Yes, my elm school did have a fairly large library. The school was literally brand new when I went there (my first year there was the first year it was open) and the state of Michigan (where I lived at the time) gave alot of money to public schools to increase their book count and quality.

      The sad thing is, the books I found when I went to school in Pennsylvania were horribly out dated (my science textbook claimed that people looked forward to the launch of Hubble, I had that book four years ago). There was nothing about MRIs in the medical books and so on. There were some good fiction books, but that area was very small.

  25. School doing it's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Education in this country is an uncaring, unthinking machine. It just hammers facts into people's heads and pushes them down the assembly line. Until schools can produce students that are smart enough to know that there are more fun things in life than picking on people, school is not doing it's job. Yes, it will need to be a more personal experience, and be more expensive, but wouldn't it be worth it? I am not trying to push one specific teaching method, only the idea that ours is NOT currently a good model.

    Or we could just hammer some new rules into their heads and hope the problem will go away. Don't forget to threaten them with punishments, that always works! Sigh...

    1. Re:School doing it's job? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree wholeheartedly, I'm 15 and at high school in the UK. Today the latest rules to 'improve discipline and school image' were revealed, they basically consist of forcing girls to remove all make-up (on top of the extremely strict uniform we've already got) and pushing us all to have school IDs which do not, AFAICS, have any purpose at all.

      Not only are they wasting their time with pointless rules, they're failing miserably in educating us properly. The fact is that all they are drilling into our heads now is facts to pass exams, not understanding. I generally have a good memory for this type of information and therefore get bored quickly - given the chance I could probably learn a years syllabus in a week and do OK on the exam. IMO the solution would be give the higher ability students the chance to understand the work on a higher level, but not according to the school, all I get is a conversation something along the lines of:
      "Why aren't you working?"
      "I finished it all."
      "Is your shirt button undone?"
      "Errr.. yes, sorry"
      "Sit in silence for the rest of the lesson, and you've got a detention if that button's undone again"

      This is the worse end of the teaching, but it's still a daily occurance.

    2. Re:School doing it's job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Same AC. It sounds bad. It wasn't that bad for me (I am 22), but it was just as ridiculous. Instead of teachers being friends with lots of delicous knowledge to share with us, they pretend to be superior, demanding obedience and fear, but how that helps eludes me. If they treated us like equals they would get plenty of respect. So much nonsense in the name of "discipline" and "obedience" surely only teaches us to be like them. Makes me wonder if bullies are just trying to be authority like the teachers. Where else do they learn it?

      Why are they making more strict rules for the students? Because it helps them pretend that they themselves aren't the problem.

    3. Re:School doing it's job? by skeeter17 · · Score: 1

      I go to what a private school, and we have a very strict code and (publicly percieved) strong academics. However, my experience of 6 years has been that the teachers who care less about the little things are often those that can teach the best and care the least about the stupid memorization stuff.

      However, one of the things that allows my school to have these teachers that teach so well is that we are not bound to standardized testing for our funding. Thus, since they do not need to make sure that all of us do well on the testing, they can teach at a more conceptual level. Many of these teachers who care less for rules would often get fired quickly from a public school where they have to follow strict curricula where they have no imput, since they would just not follow it.

      skeeter

      --
      ~skeeter
    4. Re:School doing it's job? by Lifewish · · Score: 1

      I just applied for a /. account specifically to answer this post with a resounding DAMN YES. The British school system is locked rigid with a mixture of oversyllabising, avoidance of responsibility and just plain incompetence. Even the teachers with something to say get beaten down into echoes of the system.

      I've just got out of the UK secondary school system and I've never been happier. No more stupid rules. No more getting shouted at cos I know all the stuff they're teaching and have thus fallen asleep.

      Don't get me wrong, some of the teachers were nice, even if they didn't add much to the sum of my knowledge. But some were blatantly just there because they couldn't get jobs in the real world. Example: the admin server, with all the teachers' pay details and kids' reports on, had the Unicode DT bug. The IT dept actively ignored the pleas of a friend and mine to patch it. Eventually, we just went round to the admin dept and fixed it ourselves. This was the same IT department that doesn't let us play flash games cos of the risk of viruses.

      There is life beyond A-levels though. I'm at Cambridge Uni now and loving every minute. The lecturers and supervisors don't just have a clue; they practically ARE the clue. Next year I am gonna be supervised by Dr Kelly, the guy who designed one of the key internet routing algorithms.

      My advice: jump through the hoops and do it with style. Ignore all the stuff the teacher's spouting and just get on with the work. When you've finished a module, take the textbook for the next one out of the library and study that in lessons instead. Treat homework as a useful revision exercise for that stuff you learned months ago. Then, once you've applied to Cambridge or (heaven forfend) Oxford, I'll put in a good word for you :)

      No kidding, you sound like Cambridge material

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    5. Re:School doing it's job? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:School doing it's job? by fruey · · Score: 1
      I'm English and I suffered the school system at an all boys school... with stupid uniform rules and all that. It was about 13 years ago that I was in what we called "the fifth year" and is now called "year 11" or something. Stupid.

      Anyway a couple of points. First, we still call it senior school, not high school, right? No need to translate British English into American.

      Secondly, I wholeheartedly agree, I remember sitting a three hour exam for which I had answered all the questions in an hour. The teacher who was supervising wouldn't let me leave, and so I had to endure two hours sitting doing nothing. Couldn't even read a book. I got 95% in the exam, but the supervisor didn't believe I had finished after an hour. Bitch. Punishment for being good at something - I could have written a harder exam myself but in my class were a bunch of dropouts that the teacher had to cater for.

      I would encourage you, however, to get a bit more into the subjects you really like. Saying that you can do enough to pass an exam in five minutes is great, but the free time that you have available to you as a result really should be spent profiting as much as possible intellectually. You will not believe how hard it gets, year on year, from now on. I used to read other course textbooks, novels, plays, science stuff... at least in lessons I had already understood, and I generally got away with it. The computer network was also a source of fun in lessons where there were computers, but then that was a network of BBC Micro B computers and not really too interesting after about two weeks.

      You can blame the system all you like, but once you're out of it you will have to live up to your own harsh realities. Try to help those who are trying to help you, by thinking outside of the box and maybe even improving relationships with teachers - no harm in catching them after lessons if you're interested in the subject. I ended up doing some cool weather satellite tracking with our physics teacher instead of lessons I had already mastered. It was 13 years ago too, so imagine how much more amazing that was - recording a signal overnight and decoding it slowly on a machine that had 32Kb of main RAM.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  26. Kids need to deal with it! by kramer2718 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In grade/middle school some people resented me because of my grades/intelligence. You know what I did when I got picked on? I picked back. A witty remark will often slow a bully quite well. Sure, this isn't a very civilized situation, but who ever said that kids were civilized?

    At least, there is no physical harm done in cyber-bullying. There's also no reasonable way to stop it. Shall we enact rules for school children that they never say anything that isn't nice on school time or off? Some of the examples amount to slander, and if they get particularly bad, you could bring a suit, but c'mon there are enough lawsuits now without every school child suing every other child for slander.

    I realize that being made fun of isn't very pleasant, but that's something that kids have to deal with. Their parents should help put it in perspective.

    1. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was my experience that witty comments often resulted in my getting my ass kicked.

    2. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      The preceding post was brought to you by John "Fat Lip" Kramer, aka "The Black Eye" and "The Guy with a Limp"

    3. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Far better is to gather as much evidence as possible (dates,times,numbers etc..) and submit it to the appropriate service provider. In all cases, the offending party will more than likely have their service disconnected (nothing like a $100 reconnection charge), and a squad car parked outside their front door for an evening. UK research has shown that people who are bullies at school are more likely to become criminals as adults. Here are a good few web pages which provide professional advice:

      Bullying.co.uk

      BullyOnline.org

      Schoolyard Bullying Goes High Tech

      The UK also has a Protection from Harassment Act

      Textually

    4. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I did when I got picked on? Fought back. Then I realized I was turning into a bully myself, so turned myself into a pacifist. You know what happened then? It got worse. A lot worse. And every teacher, counselor, police officer had the same attitude you've described and helped make my life hell.

      It's not something kids have to deal with. It's an artificial gulag created by the public school system. It's far from an inherent aspect of human development and until more people realize that it'll never change.

    5. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by swillden · · Score: 1

      A witty remark will often slow a bully quite well.

      The inanity of this remark needs no further comment, but I enjoy beating dead horses.

      Kids, here's what really happens when you fire a witty remark at a bully who's taunting you to impress his buddies:

      • He doesn't understand what you said/meant and in order to avoid looking stupid he slams his fist into your nose.
      • He does understand, but realizes his buddies might not and thinks he might look stupid, so he slams his fist into your nose.
      • Everyone understands, and your comment pisses him off so he slams his fist into your nose.
      • Everyone understands and thinks your comment was really funny. Since that would make you more entertaining than him, and that can't be, he puts his arm around you and pretends to be your friend so that it will be *really* funny when he slams his fist into your nose.
      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Right, a punch in the mouth would have straightened you right out. Everyone has a story about how bad he/she had it when young, but it doesn't sound like you were really subjected to the caliber of bullying that is so alarming.

    7. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Agent+Green · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting points...though none of the physical bullying I endured hurt more than the wounds themselves. I'm more concerned about the emotional scarring which bullying does...and the smaller the school is, the worse the problem can be. You can taunt back, but that does nothing to correct the problem in the first place. Kids can be the most cruel sometimes...and it's tough for a genuinely nice kid who gets picked on to savagely fight back.

      This is going to sound wrong, and probably modded as such, but the more bullies continue to fuck around, the more likely we're going to have another school massacre. Kids do have breaking points just like anyone else...and it seems like a lot of people don't remember that. If it gets bad enough, they'll kill themselves or someone else.

      I disagree that parents can put things in perspective. For example, I was walked out on at a dance when I was 14 in front of most of the school. It was quite the funny event to a lot of the school. Importance now? Zero. Importance then? Catastrophic.

      Taken insults...if done so over a long enough period, a kid can get so closed off that it can cause nearly permanent emotional damage and stunt the development of normal peer relationships. "Suck it up" is an inadequate strategy.

      I have to agree with several other posters on this thread that the school has no jurisdiction as to what happens outside of school property and school hours. Then again, I'm not proposing answers.

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
    8. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by orthancstone · · Score: 1
      A witty remark will often slow a bully quite well.


      This isn't always effective. In my junior high, a witty remark was usually just laughed at (even if the few bullies didn't understand it) and called lame immediately. Since others didn't want to be left out, they'd join in on calling it a lame comeback. That makes witty remarks about as useful as giving them the middle finger...it expresses your opinion, but no one really cares.
    9. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My witty remarks usually got me a swift ass-kicking. I quickly learned to be sullen and withdrawn. I got my ass kicked less. As the years of school abuse went by I became more and more depressed and cared less and less about anything. When I started going to school I got to go to a private school, when I was five I was starting to do multiplication and such, learning a little spanish, learning how to use computers. When I was in high school I spent most of my time just avoiding being made to do things I didn't want to do, dodging being picked on, trying to avoid people. I spent a lot of time in the library.

      So basically, what you're saying is that it's okay to subjugate those persons who are, for one reason or another, less physically adept, because it's not just about threats, those threats are backed up with violence, and the administration rarely if ever does anything about it... especially in schools with an active athletics program, and where the offenders are athletes. Which they usually are, because they're taught to be overcompetitive, and not punished for their offenses.

      Kids are cruel when they can get away with it. They can usually get away with it. They learn bad habits which will serve us all poorly in their adulthood. It is in everyone's best interests to raise polite and well-mannered children, but few people seem to want to put in the effort. If instructors and educational staff can get them to simply pass tests, they are usually happy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by coolhelperguy · · Score: 0

      I picked back. A witty remark will often slow a bully quite well.

      Too true, My favorite quote is still the following:
      Place: In the gym, sitting on the floor before gym actually starts
      bully:So, Fred, I heard that[...] Me:By the way, you're sitting on gum. He was. Really was. Scared as hell of me afterwards too. (my name's not fred, just changed it)

    11. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by John+Whorfin · · Score: 1

      Kliebold and Harris delt with, so did Kinkle. Perhaps we should keep that in perspective.

    12. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In fact, "suck it up" is the worst thing a parent or advisor can say to a bullied kid. It tells the kid that he's on his own, with zero parental or adult support, and confirms to him that "adults just don't care".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by bungo · · Score: 1

      In fact, "suck it up" is the worst thing a parent or advisor can say to a bullied kid

      Really?

      I would have thought something like 'Aim for the chest' would be worse advice than that - after all, a head shot is far better, sure you'll use more rounds as you'll miss more, but the dead don't sue.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    14. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullying goes beyond teasing - beyond name calling. It is psychological torture. Many kids go to school every day KNOWING that they will bullied - they develop serious illnesses ( including ulcers) and many also develop depression, hopelessness, and many do attempt suicide ( not always overtly - some of the most dangerous stunts I have seen are done by kids who just don't care if they live anymore).

      This issue is not about kids who can't take it - nor is it "normal". It is not normal to have to walk every day through a gauntlet of people who think they "own" the world and are entitled to anything they want when they want it.

      Athletes are often the worst offenders - because they are allowed to get away with anything because they are "stars". There is far too much emphasis on athletics and not enough emphasis on other aspects of high school life. The be all and end all of high school seems to be who is "cool" and who is not. There is no rhyme or reason to what is and what is not "cool". How many kids end up in situations they cannot get out of because being cool is the only thing that matters? More than most realize, I would be willing to bet. The newest rage seems to be "sex parties" where pretty much anything goes ( my teens have been told about these parties). How many young girls are co-erced into activities they would rather not do simply to stay in the "cool" group? How many are used simply to service the young studs and then are treated as sluts because they did?

      These things happen and are happening in our schools and in our homes - my question is where the heck are the parents? Why are more parents not up in arms about this? The answer is simple - parents are often the last to know about anything and who wants to believe their precious little Johnny/Joan would ever do anything so bad? There is far too many people who do not open their eyes and SEE what is what.

      After a hell--n earth high school life I left and moved on - finding new friends and eventually a husband - I had to work overtime to get any sense of self-esteem back - and sometimes it is still a struggle. All those big dudes at high school are still in the town I grew up in - and still being bullies and passing on their sense of entitlement to their kids.

      We cannot sit idly by while our kids are self-destructing - that does not mean we lock up our children and control their every movement - it means we educate ourselves and them about what is and is not acceptable behaviour. We teach them to set limits for themselves by setting limits for them at an early age. It means we, as a society, speak out against this torture and abuse - call it what it is - not teasing, not kids being kids, but psychological torture and abuse. It is unacceptable and until we speak out we will only see it escalte - how many more Columbine's and Padukah's do we need?? How many more suicides of talented young people do we need??

      Wake up people and see what shrugging our shoulders and saying nothing has done.

    15. Re:Kids need to deal with it! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Taking your comment seriously... (tho anyone in a "burglars sue homeowners, and WIN" state knows that a head shot is always best ;) ...at least "aim for the chest" tells the kid that the parent mighta been there and has a clue, or at least feels that their kid shouldn't just BE a victim. Which is better than "tough shit, you're on your own" (how "suck it up" gets translated by a kid's backbrain).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  27. JonKatz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ye gods, where are you man?! This post-columbine hellmouth in the making needs your incicive reportage!

  28. These are future terrorists... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't get mad, I'd get even, Call the DHS and tell them that you've been terrorized. Have them track who these terrorists are send them off. Where do we send them? I don't care as long as they can't pick on me any more. Go ahead disappear those bullies! I won't miss them. Go ahead; make all the mean people go away.

  29. soap box miss used. by Brigadier · · Score: 4, Insightful



    At first read I found this laughable but after a bit of thought I see a rekindling of an already occurring problem. Children will always be children, they will always be immature, they will always be impressionable. The problem herein is parents. I have a 10yo, and 11yo. They do not go on the internet without permission and they conduct themselves as we dictate. No chat rooms, no e-mails from anyone we dont already know. The parents of all there friends form a network with us via e-mail and the children are aware of this. They also respect it understanding the inherent dangers of the internet. Using yahoo parental controls anyone sending them e-mails with profanities or pre flagged words gets reported to us. If the account they are using is linked to a parental account reporting it to the parent is easy. So before someone starts blaming the internet look to the Parents.

    1. Re:soap box miss used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, you sound like Flanders.

    2. Re:soap box miss used. by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      Heh, most of the time parents will buy their kids computers and they won't know how to set up parental controls like that. Obviously most people on /. who have kids are different, but a lot of parents know next to nothing and either don't set it up or set it up in such a way that a reasonably intelligent kid can break through it. Personally, my parents talked about installing one of those things but soon realized that I'd just go around it.

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    3. Re:soap box miss used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good job mine fuer

  30. Luckily by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    You can block instant messages.

    All my bullies either insulted me behind my back or to my face where they could beat the crap out of me and take my stuff afterwards. Everyone was either out to get me or unwilling to interfere, even the teachers.

  31. Mandatory? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since when are Google searches mandatory? Did I miss a memo? Oh wait, I know, I bet in was in that memo with the thing about the TPS report cover sheets. Damn, looks like I'll be working this weekend to retrofit my submissions...

  32. Another reason why parents should be involved. by Kermee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Same tune. Different method. Cyber bullying is no different from physical bullying in the sense of how it should be handled. The serious lack of discipline and the whole "My kid would NEVER do that!" attitude shows how poor parenting is a breeding ground for these activities. Last thing a school should do is add MORE policies. But in the end, rules and laws are created to protect us, right? Give me a break.

  33. Well, it was a matter of time... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

    And to think nerds once held the internet as a private refuge.

    1. Re:Well, it was a matter of time... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      And to think nerds once held the internet as a private refuge.

      The funny thing is, what kind of insecure person feels they need to belittle someone else to make themselves feel better? That just seems kind of odd. The bullies are obviously the losers in this case.

    2. Re:Well, it was a matter of time... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I tried to tell myself that too in 6th grade. Didn't seem like it at the time.

  34. Who is responsable? by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sure I'll get modded Troll for this one but...

    Is it really a school's responsibility to deal with this?? Would a school be held accountable if signs of a derogatory nature were put up around town?

    The school should do something if the site is created on school property, but I don't know if there is anything they should have to do otherwise.

    Still, this sucks. I can't begin to say how glad I am that this was not around when i was in school.

    1. Re:Who is responsable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the school's responisibility to control and monitor interactions between students when they are off-grounds which will affect them when they are on-grounds. case closed.

    2. Re:Who is responsable? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      it is if stuff is happening on school grounds. Like taking pictures, Using cell phones to orginaze harrassment, etc.
      I wish this was around when I was a kid. I'd post every damn picture of the football team drinking alcohol, and point the local newspapers to it.

      every asshole who was picking on people would find there lives very public.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Who is responsable? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Since kids have to go to school the school has to take responsiblity for the ramifications of this requirement. Obviously a grown adult would avoid an ugly situation by choosing not to avoid those people, the kids don't have that choice. Schools can require you to work at home (homework), right?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  35. Slander Laws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slander laws are sufficient, why recreate the wheel.

    Every other undertaking done as a policy shift in schools and in particular children/teens has backfired. Usually accomplishing the undesirable behaviour popularization and eventual acceptance amoung teachers of who should be picked on and who shouldn't. I'm very surprised this kind of stuff is still taken seriously.

    1. Re:Slander Laws. by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Slander laws are sufficient, why recreate the wheel.

      Because the legal system operates with glacier-speed slowness. Half of these kids would graduate before a case ever made its way in front of a judge.

    2. Re:Slander Laws. by Jaycatt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...and when it does make it in front of a judge, you might get Judge Snyder from the Simpsons calling for a writ of "Boys will be boys". I wonder how many cases involving children get that kind of response...

      --
      "Shared pain is lessened; shared joy is increased. Thus we refute entropy" - Spider Robinson
    3. Re:Slander Laws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets face it, there really are some people who just deserve to be picked on. As a recent slashdot example, anyone remember SirHaxalot? This stupid karma whore even came back several times with different screen names, only to be outed each time and properly ridiculed.

  36. Big deal by Remlik · · Score: 1

    So I assume the standard solution to face to face bullies applies? Ignore them and they will go away.

    I'm sure most of the /. crowd was/is subject to taunting, bullying, name calling what have you..we all seemed to come out fine in the end, and I never once had to fight anyone in the school yard, they never showed.

    --
    Apple free since 1990!
  37. Time to educate kids by vanyel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For one thing, such e-messages are traceable records; bullying in person is insidious because they're usually careful to make sure that no one actually can prove they did it. Parents and school officials can use these to deal with the bullies promptly.

    On the other hand, kids need to be taught how to deal with stuff like that, and probably the tabloid press is a good place to use as an example: show them how some celebrities take it too seriously and waste a lot of time an energy fighting it, while others make fun of it and ignore it.

    They can also make use of it to find out who their real friends are. People who believe everything they hear without checking at the source aren't much of a friend in the first place.

    1. Re:Time to educate kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, kids need to be taught how to deal with stuff like that,

      Yeah, like smashing the asshat up against the locker trying to cave it in with his head...

      It worked for me in junior high... I wasn't screwed with cince 7th grade because I snapped on the bully.

      I dont care what the schools try to say, nothing teaches a bully to back off like having his arse mercilessly kicked in public.

      remember kiddies, make them think you are absolutely crazy and will kill them next time.

    2. Re:Time to educate kids by shirai · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this and take it a little further.

      Interestingly enough, if you get together a group of successful (wealthy and happy) people and talk about how school should help, they almost will invariable come up with the idea that they should teach more about social interaction at school.

      Sure you have your school counselors and a few "guidance" days but they are next to useless and too far in between. Ironically, at best only half of "real life" consists of what you do with your skills and talents. The other half or more is how you deal with people and I don't care if you are a computer programmer: You will get a lot farther if you have good, if not great, people skills.

      --
      Sunny

      Be my Friend

    3. Re:Time to educate kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids aren't adults, they can't handle it like adults can. They don't need to learn to handle it in junior high. The thing is, a the kid often ends up with NO friends, because the people who would be their friends are afraid of becoming targets themselves! How does it feel to have no friends, and even have former friends turn on you to protect themselves (but of course you won't see it that way, even if it would help)?

      These are fine solutions for adults. Kids aren't adults. They need protection.

    4. Re:Time to educate kids by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "People who believe everything they hear without checking at the source aren't much of a friend in the first place."

      apparently they go on to start slashdot...

      I joke.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Just remember: by Xzzy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "The article suggests many tips for combating the problem - chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies."

    it's a double edged sword. I personally do not think the schools have any business moderating events that take place outside of school.

    1. Re:Just remember: by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "I personally do not think the schools have any business moderating events that take place outside of school."

      The catch is that kids are forced to go to school. Since they have no freedom in this regard the school should be responsible for the direct ramifications of this outside of school property.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Just remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since they have no freedom in this regard ... they should have no freedom in the rest of their life, either?

    3. Re:Just remember: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can be homescholed or go to a diffrent school :\

    4. Re:Just remember: by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Kinda like suggesting that Slashdot readers have the right to moderate posts made over at K5 :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Just remember: by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      And if you don't like the supermarket you can grow your own crops, right?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Just remember: by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      How is protecting them (something they are asking for) infringing on their rights? I guess firemen infringe on your right to die in a fire.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  39. Just crack the bullies' systems.. by caveat · · Score: 1

    ..send threatening texts/emails to Federal officials, put up "i'm going to kill the President" diatribes on their websites, use their computers to h4x0r merchants and steal financial info...come on, this is the *perfect* situation to turn their weapons against them.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Just crack the bullies' systems.. by herulach · · Score: 0

      Im sure youre just trying to joke, but i think its important to remember that not all kids who get bullied are into computers. And that even those who are would prob be scared of retaliating in such a direct fashion, i mean, itd be a bit obvious who it was who cracked the website set up specifically to take the mickey out of them.

    2. Re:Just crack the bullies' systems.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fight carefully. Don't h4x0r their box - let them find out how to h4x0r your box, then report them to their ISP.

  40. Jurisdicition problem by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The idea of schools having policies about what students can do online (from their homes, not from school) is absurd. Sure, schools don't like it, but there's a much more serious problem of schools imposing jurisdiction outside of school. Schools have responsibility for students when they are on school grounds, participating in school functions, or on school-provided transportation. Other than that, the minute a student steps off school grounds, the school should have no jurisdiction over him.

    Granted, if a student posts pictures on a private web site, and those pictures were taken at school in violation of a stated policy, then there could be room for action.

    1. Re:Jurisdicition problem by Noodles · · Score: 1

      What if the bully-ers are stalking the bully-ee at school so they can take photos for their cool website?

    2. Re:Jurisdicition problem by crow · · Score: 1

      Then the bully-ers should be punished for the stalking at school.

    3. Re:Jurisdicition problem by ameoba · · Score: 1

      It's not that uncommon for things done outside of school to be dealt with through the school. Outside of obvious exceptions (school trips, sporting events, etc) it's pretty common for fights between students (even when off school hours & time) to be dealt with by the school.

      Even as a sophomore in college, I nearly got kicked out of the dorms because one of my room mates reported on some (admittedly fucked up, but nowhere near as overblown as he made it) stuff I did at a party. Off campus. Sixty miles away. During break.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Jurisdicition problem by crow · · Score: 1

      I certainly realize that schools claim jurisdiction over their students regardless of where they are, but I would like to see those claims challenged and thrown out, especially for public institutions.

      Likewise, employers shouldn't have control over what employees do in their non-work hours (like developing "Netflix Fanatic"), but all too aften they claim that they do have the right to control.

      Likewise, the US federal government shouldn't regulate in-state activity that isn't directly tied to interstate commerce, but lawmakers have pretty much given up on even bothering to pretend that there's a connection when passing laws.

  41. Tragic... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. I'm sure somewhere a senator/president/judge is figuring out someway to use this to further erode our rights in this country.

    2. Why doesn't the current hate speech laws on the books take care of this sort of thing?

    If some kid puts up a site about how I'm a piece of shit and offers to pay anybody 20 dollars to beat me up, don't I have recourse to go to the police?

    What's considered a hollow threat and what's considered authentic?

    I also stand proudly among the many fellow geeks who were pushed around and told repeatidly that I was going to die either at lunch, in the hall or after school at the hands of [insert random roving band of fucktards].

    That's it, my child is going to he homeschooled. I figure the money I save on bulletproof vests and lunch money, I can put towards social interaction classes ;-)

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Tragic... by cyberwench · · Score: 1

      Current hate speech and threat laws should be applicable. In the case of the web site in the second article, it seems like it would be a relatively simple matter to contact the ISP and have them boot the customer (threatening people usually violates your contract).

      When people do things through such completely traceable mediums, they should have the book thrown at them. Usually, bullying is almost invisible and proof's hard to find. While this is a horrible situation, it's one that actually has recourse for the victim.

      --
      ~ Leilah
    2. Re:Tragic... by dheltzel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That's it, my child is going to he homeschooled. I figure the money I save on bulletproof vests and lunch money, I can put towards social interaction classes ;-)

      You got that right. I was so disturbed by the way other kids treated me (and other kids, whenever they weren't harrassing me) that as a teenager I vowed I'd never have kids at all, because I didn't want them to go through what happened to me (or worse, become one of the bullies).
      Then, in college, I was introduced to some families that homeschooled and their kids sure were different than my school peers were. Now I have 3 kids (11 to 16) and they are/were homeschooled until they decided to on their own to change (younger 2 are still being homeschooled). It's a really great option and the people who complain they aren't being "properly socialized" must be the parent of bullies who want more victims for their kids.
      My daughter was 15 when she had her first ride on a public school bus. She was a little disturbed by the misbehavior of some of the other students, but she understood that their parents (and teachers) set different standards for them. She has adjusted much better than I ever did (I was in public school from kindergarten on) and is a model student in both grades and extra curricular activities.

      There is no question that home schooled kids are "sheltered" from the real world. But I think that's a positive. My kids never learned how to cut down their peers with viscious words or physical violence. They assume that being friendly with people will be to their advantage and they act much more grown up than many adults I work with.

      You can write this off as being a "proud father", but I'm very happy my kids were home schooled during the years when it matters most. We geeks understand the pain that can result from "proper socialization" better than most people, and the idea of home schooling is really very logical for us.

    3. Re:Tragic... by pyros · · Score: 1

      if they offer to pay people to cause you physical harm, then yes. If they knowingly distribute false information (libel/slander), then yes. If they state everything they say is opinion or provide factual data, and don't offer to pay people to hurt you or damage your property, then that's free speech and is protected.

    4. Re:Tragic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My daughter was 15 when she had her first ride on a public school bus.

      Geez she actually told you about that?!?

      She was a little disturbed by the misbehavior of some of the other students

      Yeah I can remember having to say sorry about some of my friends at the time, it wasn't my fault they wanted to watch....

      They assume that being friendly with people will be to their advantage and they act much more grown up than many adults I work with.

      I know exactly what you mean ;-)

    5. Re:Tragic... by scrabblenut · · Score: 1
      We also homeschool our children. And I commend you on your post. I don't think "sheltering" needs to be the bad word it has grown to be. There is a tremendous difference between the daddy fish in "Finding Nemo", and sensible protection of our children. It is a parent's responsibility to ensure proper care and health of children. That includes raising them in a healthy atmosphere.

      The advantage is they learn more about how to conduct themselves in the real world than they did in school. They interact with people of all ages every day and it's not limited to just people who share the same birth year. Just the same as would be expected after they graduate, or in the summer holidays.

      The "but what about socialization" issue is slowly becoming obsolete. Humans are social creatures, even the more introverted do seek out people to interact with from time to time. And I often remember being told by my teacher, sternly, "Do your socialization after school hours and not in my classroom!"

  42. links to actual sites? by StevenHallman76 · · Score: 1

    anybody got links to some actual content? I could use a good laugh!

  43. The CyberBully's Upper Hand by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    If a teacher/principal/administrator tries to deal with a cyberbully, s/he will find a knock on their door, courtesy of Ashcroft for the Patriot Act, and/or RIAA/SBA lawyers for violation of the DMCA.

    Tattling is Fun *AND* Patriotic!

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  44. Wait a minute by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    When did bully's figure out how to work a computer?

  45. Poor Ghyslain by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

    This, and your comments put the "Star Wars Kid" into perspective. And people said he shouldn't complain because he got a free iPod as a result of being an Internet meme.

    1. Re:Poor Ghyslain by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 1

      Good point. I forgot about the whole SWK thing. Yeah, if I were him I would have been devistated at first, but then I would have liked it once I realized that people thought that was "cool" because everyone had seen "the movie".

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    2. Re:Poor Ghyslain by strelitsa · · Score: 1

      His parents should be horsewhipped for giving him a name like that. Somehow, I don't think that he would have been subject to so much worldwide abuse if his name had been Pierre or Jacques.

      --
      No mod points, no meta-moderating/Firehose/all the other free work Slashdot wants me to do.
    3. Re:Poor Ghyslain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hate to admit that I actually like Friends, but it's like when the doctor said, "And I know it's not my place, but please don't name your son Pheobo."

      Wow, I'm gay.

    4. Re:Poor Ghyslain by SteakandcheeseUm · · Score: 1

      It got really out of control though. Just look at this article!

      article!

      Having to finish school in a mental hospital shows how much he suffered for this.

  46. The old days.. by Mr_Cheeky · · Score: 2, Funny

    What ever happened to being stuffed into a locker?

  47. Not new by Isbiten · · Score: 1

    In sweden almost all school students use a site called www.lunarstorm.se and it's not all that rare that people sign up with an account like "person x sucks" and write all kind of stuff there.

    --
    I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
  48. This is a Good Thing (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's face it; bullying will always happen. It happened 100 years ago and will still be happening 100 years from now. The good thing about "cyber-bullying" is that it now gives physically inferior kids the opportunity to turn the tables on the Neanderthals that have been beating them up, stealing their lunch money, and calling them homophobic names.

    I believe that the tide is turning in the age-old schoolyard wars. In just a few years, you may see the strong-but-dumb types quaking in fear of the smart-but-diminutive types because they don't want to have them put up a Web site like www.billysmithsucksass.com or something like that. In recent years we have seen that the smaller kids that were picked on in school are the ones that end up succeeding in life. In future years we will see those same kids being the ones who own the playground as well. The lunkheads will be the ones living in fear and I for one feel that they deserve at after being on top so long.

    So bring on cyber bullying, it's high time that things were equalized.

  49. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know, someone is going to get ahold of a video of a kid, who may be slightly overweight, showcasing his Star Wars lightsaber staff skills, and post it all over the net!

    It'll spread like wildfire, and the kid will be made fun of, so badly that he has to drop out of school! ... Wait...

    Ok, in all seriousness, this actually is a pretty severe problem. Kids can be cruel to other kids, they don't even realize it. I've seen high school students expelled for even mentioning web sites where other highschool girls are rated "hot or not".

    It's pretty sad, really.

    Tyrion Xavier

  50. Same pattern different medium by kishphish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..was horrified to discover an entire site had been created to insult and threaten her.
    Why should this surprise anyone? 20 years ago this would have been '..was horrified to discover an entire bathroom wall had been created to insult and threaten her'.

  51. necessity by thoolihan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now to invent a cell phone that can give wedgies...

    -t

    --
    http://unmoldable.com W:"No one of consequence" I:"I must know" W:"Get used to disappointment"
  52. Cyber Bullies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now accepting paypal in lieu of lunch money beatings.

  53. For every problem there is a solution by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    aka revenge of the nerds. A website where picked-on kid reports the bullying action and the names of the bullies, to include e-mail address, cell phone number, IM nick, address, etc. Sympathic souls would take up the cause to harass the bully in creative ways. I envision it as the slashdot effect for punks...

    1. Re:For every problem there is a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when bullies learn about the site and post the nerds' info there?

    2. Re:For every problem there is a solution by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Profit!!!!

      I neglected to mention this would be a pay service :)

  54. Where are the links? by in7ane · · Score: 1

    The google search and all... but I want links to sample pages. This has to be far too entertaining to see!

    1. Re:Where are the links? by Gigant0r · · Score: 1

      I posted earlier but it got modded down by some bitter asshole; I got kicked out of school 4 years ago for this right here which I wrote about a classmate (his website is here)

    2. Re:Where are the links? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious, there's nothing funnier than pissed off people :)

      sorry...

  55. I'll show you who the bully is! by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article sux0r5, and so does the author, MIKE WENDLAND!

    MIKE WENDLAND, I've got embarrassing pictures of you!

    And I know where you work, MIKE WENDLAND!

    I'll be watching to see if you write any more of your "columns", MIKE WENDLAND!

    Yeah, don't you forget it MIKE WENDLAND. I'll be watching every Monday and Friday, and alternate Tuesdays and Thurdays.

    1. Re:I'll show you who the bully is! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Is this an example of bullying or telemarketing?

  56. Re:YOU CANT HIDE FROM THE TRUTH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad two people beat your to it. ;)

  57. Missing Link? by xRizen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How come there's no link to these so called "invasive pictures"?

  58. Education not legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better solution would be for the schools to teach classes on respect, tolerance and compassion. It's pretty obvious that a lot of parents aren't teaching their kids these important ideas, and it leads to long term societal problems.

    The solution is education not legislation. Isn't that what schools are for?

    1. Re:Education not legislation by goldspider · · Score: 1
      Wrong, wrong, WRONG!!

      Schools need to teach kids math, literacy, and science! It is NOT the job of the school system to substitute for bad parenting! It's this politically-correct approach to public education that's producing more and more dumb kids!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Education not legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Schools need to teach kids math, literacy, and science!"

      I agree.

      "It is NOT the job of the school system to substitute for bad parenting! It's this politically-correct approach to public education that's producing more and more dumb kids!"

      I don't agree. There are few things more ignorant than bullying. It is the school's responsibility to educate the citizens. It is ironic that your failure to connect these two things is due to lack of education. The number one problem facing society today is the severe lack of compassion. The uncivil tone of your reply is just one example.

    3. Re:Education not legislation by dema · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the school system is going to take a person's child for 8hrs/day, 5 days/week, you can't say that the parent is the only one influencing the child. A lot of kids in middle and high school probably see teachers and friends just as much, if not more, than their parents. It's not like parents WANT that, but in order to get anywhere in society (in most cases) one has to AT LEAST finish high school. In a majority of these cases the parent is probably out working so he/she can make money to keep food on the table, and maybe even pay for the child's education. In the case where the child works that's even less time he/she is at home, and more time to be influenced by others. If the government, and society as whole, is going to place such importance of going to and graduating from school, they better be making up for the time they are taking kids away from their parents.

    4. Re:Education not legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A better solution would be for the schools to teach classes on respect, tolerance and compassion.

      Schools can't even teach most people how to do basic maths, how do you expect them to teach something like that?

    5. Re:Education not legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I don't agree. There are few things more ignorant than bullying. It is the school's responsibility to
      >educate the citizens. It is ironic that your failure to connect these two things is due to lack of education.

      You don't have to be educated to be a good man, nor does it in any way prevent you from doing bad things.

    6. Re:Education not legislation by TGK · · Score: 1

      I'll just submit this for general consumption.

      The fundamental problem with most teachers/administrator's is that they've gone and collected at least one BA/BS and at least one post graduate degree (typicaly in education, meaningless as that is).

      The result is they've been away from the setting they're trying to control for an absolute minimum of 7 years (typicaly more).

      Most of these people have forgotten what it's like to be between the ages of 11 and 18. They've lost track of how insanely vicious, cruel, and downright rabbid kids can be at this age.

      When they do try to fix it the result is a half wited program that sounds like a cross between Disney and Soviet propaganda. It insults the intelegence of the students, takes five times longer than it needs to take, and general just pisses people off.

      Most students leave the auditorium thinking how great it would be to kick the shit out of that punk ass little bastard who took notes on his palm pilot.

      Wana solve these problems? Hire younger teachers. Get people fresh out of college who are closer to the students age wise.

      Of course, No Child Left Behind is just going to make this worse, not better... but that's another rant for another day.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    7. Re:Education not legislation by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid it is you who are wrong. First, the simple brute fact is that, so long as we insist on letting the school system be in charge of kids for 30 hours a week, the school system must work to instill values in kids. Otherwise, they're in school just long enough to unlearn everything.

      Next, there's the fact that bullying, cheating, and whatnot do not just present moral issues; left unchecked, they represent a huge impediment to learning. Schools have to teach that these things are inappropriate anyhow, so we may as well just make it an official part of the curriculum.

      Finally, you're taking far too narrow a view of the role of schools. If the job of the education system is merely to teach "math, literacy, and science," then why not take the next logical step and simply turn them into glorified trade schools? After all, 95% of people won't go into science, or need anything beyond simple algebra.

      The reason this is wrongheaded is because schools have a much broader purpose: To socialize children, and turn them into adults. This goes beyond merely being good workers, or even scientifically and culturally literate. It also includes being an informed citizen, a skeptical consumer, and an honest and principled individual.

      We can argue over whether public schools succeed in these goals, and whether these goals would actually be helped by formal classroom instruction on respect, tolerance, and ethics. But these are the goals of the education system, and they are appropriate ones.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Education not legislation by shotfeel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I must be reading something other than what everyone else is.

      It IS the responsibility of the school to provide an environment where learning can take place. Bullying, cyber or otherwise, is contradictory to this goal. This bullying is not just taking place off-campus. Its happening on the school grounds and is sometimes aided by school equipment! Schools DO need to have policies to address this No camera phones in the locker room, rules on what is appropriate on school sponsored web sites, what can be done with school equipment, do you allow instant messaging in classrooms if at all on campus...

      How did we get from an article about cyber bullying to rants about parents not doing their job?

    9. Re:Education not legislation by loucura! · · Score: 1

      The reason this is wrongheaded is because schools have a much broader purpose: To socialize children, and turn them into adults.

      If that is the case, then why don't we remove every child from their parent's custody and put them into "school" until they're 18?

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    10. Re:Education not legislation by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight: I believe that schools have a role in socializing children. Therefore, I must be in favor of having the state usurp all parental rights, including the right to raise said children.

      You, sir, have proven my point. It really does take a village to raise an idiot.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:Education not legislation by loucura! · · Score: 1

      You didn't state that they had a role in socialising children, you stated that their broader purpose was to socialise them. Quite a difference. If you meant the former, you should have stated it.

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    12. Re:Education not legislation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a bit naive. With that logic there would be no need for any laws. There has to be some borders layedout by society of acceptable behaviour towards others.

    13. Re:Education not legislation by goldspider · · Score: 1
      I'm all about laws (at least laws that make sense and aren't over-intrusive) and a lawful society, but I'm also all about separating the responsibilities of school and home.

      While students are in school, it is of course reasonable for the school to enforce a certain code of conduct. However once a student leaves campus grounds, the school's (and by proxy the taxpayers') responsibility ends.

      And as a side, I believe that kids shouldn't be forced, by law, to go to school, however if they don't go to school, they should automatically be disqualified for any taxpayer-funded financial aid.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    14. Re:Education not legislation by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      So imagine I said that the purpose of a car was to transport people. Would I need to state, just to make it perfectly clear, that I was in no way opposed to the use of buses, planes, and inline skates to accomplish the same purpose?

      Of course not. If I meant to say that parents are not competent to raise children, and that children would be better off being raised by the government, I would have said as much. You jumped to a totally unwarranted conclusion, and made yourself look like a fool in doing so.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  59. Photoshop their heads onto gay porn... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    ...and release it onto Kazaa, or those picture-rating sites. Sit back and watch what happens.

    --
    Blar.
  60. SHUT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you guys don't shut up about this, I'm going to kick your ass. Pussy boy.

    1. Re:SHUT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG I'm soooo telling teh /. moddy's on U! Y soo meany!!! I hate my life and will kill myself....

  61. Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One time back when I was in High School another guy kept being a jackass to me. I finally got him to shut up when I spoofed an e-mail from him going to another guy confessing that he was gay and wanted to go out with him.

    He left me alone after that, either he was too busy getting picked on by everyone else, or I outed him and he had no reason to release pent up agression.

    1. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice 0wnage there

  62. Damn Slashdot bullies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...stole my web server's lunch money.

  63. My experience... by Professor+North · · Score: 1
    Though now in my third year of university, a situation much like this came to be while I was in grade 12 at my high school. An ex-student had compiled a webpage, which within contained a list of students in the school whom they felt to be losers. Names were added and removed over time, but some people actually took large offense to this and were determined to put a stop to it.
    Nonetheless, I myself (though not on the 'list') along with the majority of the student body found it to be more comical than malicious. People forgot, and in turn forgot to care.
    While actual violence shouldn't be tolerated, there is a lesson here. In my opinion, like most other alike forms of high school behavior, people will forget and move on. Only by highlighting the issue will it come to be a longstanding (and rememorable) one.
    --
    - - Just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand. - -
  64. not really by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Bully hurts nerd 2) Nerd makes website insulting bully 3) Bully hurts nerd worse

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it's:

      1) Bully hurts nerd
      2) Nerd makes website insulting bully
      3) Nerd gets arrested, expelled from school, and/or shuffled off to mandatory counseling sessions, in order to prevent another Columbine.
      4) Bully, needless to say, goes completely unpunished.

    2. Re:not really by LittleGuy · · Score: 1


      1) Bully hurts nerd
      2) Nerd makes website insulting bully
      3) Nerd gets arrested, expelled from school, and/or shuffled off to mandatory counseling sessions, in order to prevent another Columbine.
      4) Bully, needless to say, goes completely unpunished.


      5) Bully grows up, gets MBA, becomes Pointy-Head Boss, gets paid by company for professional bullying.
      6) Bully becomes Corporate Executive, makes political contributions, raids 401K accounts.(*)
      7) Prof- oh hell. You know.

      (*)6a) Female Bully gets TV show, Corporate Empire, cries on Diane Sawyer when called on bullying tactics.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  65. Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "as a high schooler, i'd have rather been slugged in the arm a few dozen times rather than have my shoes made fun of."

    This just in - you are a pussy. Film at 11.

    1. Re:Breaking News by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      I just love having my own troll... I think it's just so cute! I wanna hug him and take him to the mall with me. I like to daydream about the day I meet my troll and I dress him up and do his hair :P

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  66. good for the goose/gander by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Isn't the rise of cyberbullying inevitable, given the rise of cybersluttery? They're each a symptom of testosterone/estrogen poisoning, transcending the distance of physical bodies with the Internet. In fact, this tandem dynamic shows just how much more advanced feminine wiles have become, with masculine wherewithall catching up. And since "on the Internet, no one knows you're a dog", males and females can now wallow in each other's traditional gender traps.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  67. Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ouch, dude, beef stew all over my keyboard. I think a carrot through my nose. Please don't say things that funny while I'm eating anymore. Thanks.

  68. I was the cyber bully in highschool by theblacksun · · Score: 1

    I pulled all sorts of online stunts on people at school and others; it didn't stop me from getting picked on at school but it did help me develop skills that have earned me thousands of dollars to date. I was good enough that I never got fingered as the culprit.

    I'll have to point out that what I did mostly included social engineering with a little hacking.

    --
    Ignorance kills, complacency kills, hatred kills, but usually not the ones guilty of them.
  69. The really funny thing is... by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1, Troll

    I could see this story happening another way.....a school invokes a policy where cruely making fun of another student would result in suspension......then a day later, we would have that little mouth taped up fellow icon detailing a story of how some stupid American school was stealing kids' free speach.

    Oh, and I'm sure the Bush admin would get blamed somehow too.....

    --
    Kiss my shiny metal ass
    1. Re:The really funny thing is... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I could see this story happening another way.....a school invokes a policy where cruely making fun of another student would result in suspension......then a day later, we would have that little mouth taped up fellow icon detailing a story of how some stupid American school was stealing kids' free speach.

      Good point.

      There are lines between free speech, and defamation, harassment and stalking; but they are not always clear and well-lit.

      To take a simple example: if I say "I'm going to hurt you so bad!" as we sit down for a game of chess, that is different than if I've cornered you in a dark alley and am walking toward you with a large knife. The former is legitimate speech, the latter is a threat.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  70. Oh Good Grief! by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    What's next? School policies dictating that you have to be "friends" with everyone?

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  71. W000, dumass subject. dumass writer. by TyrranzzX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Although I am suprised the starwars kid hasn't killed himself to end the pain or in the very least, locked himself in a room far away from the dark recesses of the internet to keep away from the scrutiny, I think this article is a tub of bullshit. Mabye in the more social, personal, chatty circles where anyone will believe anything because they are dumasses it may be a problem, but for the rest of us geeks who handle their communication more like TCP/IP rather than humans it isn't much of a problem. Inotherwords, anyone who said "Omg, I didn't expect that" is a complete dumass; where there's a way to communicate there will always be dumasses using it.

    Then again, school teachers have never thought it was their responsability to keep bullies from giving someone a verbal beating, but rather, to ensure that the bullies don't end up paralyzed from the neck down by a lucky punch of kick or full of bulletholes in my experience. Which is the whole reason these things happen because if the bully was educated and understood "If you piss jonny off enough, he will inflict great pain on you and may even kill you. Think columbine. Understand?" the kid might think it's a bad idea to tease other kids so badly they think it's a good idea to go on a killing spree. Of course, it may also be a good idea to hold verbal abuse on the level of physical abuse. While much harder to proove, if the annoying asshole who teased you got the crap kicked out of him he'd think twice about opening his big toothy maw, and if he got a detention for starting it he'd be real suprised at the fact the system actually worked. It's only logical that as new technology comes along it'll be abused in the same way.

    I'm also kind of annoyed at this title "The rise of cyber bullying". What idiot thought it necissary or even interesting to write this article? Oh yea, after reading the first sentance the light went on in the brain; the same ones who try to make parents afraid of everything from antrhax in the mail to other parents abducting their kids. It's idiots like this that I'd like to take out into the street and beat into a bloody pulp, if they didn't do what they did then our culture wouldn't be so afraid of itself. If television wasn't the constant dispenser of FUD it is then people would let their kids go out on haloween and have fun or it could be like in the 1970's when the real asshole of a teacher got tp'd. If this kind of bullshit didn't exist parents would actually be decent and not have an escape from their responsabilities into the land of idiocy to bring back thoughtful and stupid ideas about parenting some idiot, given an austere of legitimancy by writing for an newspaper that lets them be more comfertable about raising their kids.

    So, in my mind this gets filed under the "trivial bullshit" section where I keep most of my useless drivvel; behind steel walls so it doesn't seep into the other stuff by accident.

  72. What right does the school have by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    to regulate the conduct of a student outside of the school's authority?

    Let's say that on a Saturday little Billy posts a website saying that little Susie (who happens to be little Billy's ex girlfriend) is a slut or a tramp, or has bad feminine hygiene.

    The school has no right to punish him for this. Is what he did illegal? If what he says happens to be true, no. The police can't punish him for taking advantage of his free speech rights. No school has the right to usurp authority like that.

    Maybe a private shcool could get away with something like that. They provide a service and would have the right to refuse that service to anyone they choose.

    Had there been a web when I was in high school, I would have probably done my best to let the world know how much of a whore a certain ex girlfriend of mine(cough, cough, Jamie Manning) was. I don't see why things would be any different for the current generation.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  73. Obviously this requires government involvement... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article suggests many tips for combating the problem - chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies.
    Back in my day we harrassed each other using the spoken and handwritten word. We passed notes sneakernet style and we talked while huddling in the hallways. We didn't have personal digital cameras, but some of us could sure draw. A rumor is a rumor -- text messaging doesn't give it some strange new power. So, what's the fucking point of this article? Kids are doing the same shit kids have been doing since before recorded history. Just now they're using technology to do it. Yay. Back when I had to walk uphill both ways ten miles through six-foot snowdrifts to get to school, I was told to just ignore namecalling, do not respond in kind, do not let it affect me, and hold myself above it. You know what? I did, and I'm a better person for it. Wow. What a concept! You time-out giving, let's-talk-about-your-feelings, here let's-make-rules-to-prevent-unhappy-feelings hippies are trying to raise a generation of children who expect Big Brother to always be there to help them out in a pinch. Thanks. You're handing our country over to the corporations of tomorrow. Gone will be the independent, take-no-bullshit spirit that made America great. We'll all be a bunch of whinging mama's boys who won't have the nerve to fight for what's right. Al-Queida does not play fair and they don't want to talk things through. And you sure as shit stinks can't give them a time out. Make kids deal with this crap themselves. Let them teach each other the hard way how to deal with those who would repress them or harrass them or even physically assault them.
  74. Cmon Geeks Unite by eadint · · Score: 1

    This is easy, if someone speads messages about you, backtrace to the sender. once youve got the email address, you find out who all of his freinds are. next go to goatse.cx, use photoshop and paste the bullys face on the goatse pic, email it to all of his freinds and say hey guys i just wanted to show you my something speacial. than port snif his address and use it to sent a text message to the principal that he/she is bringingt a gun into school to kill them. wala no more cyber bully problem, the bully is thought of as a deranged sexual pervert with violent tendancys and is locked up forever. man oh man oh man i wish they had those kind of devices when i was in school. just think of the kind of, life destroying revenge geeks like us could have done. we would have all the hot chicks ( phone cam blackmail) and all of the jocks and bullies would be in lockup or considered sexual miscreants) you geeks of today have it soooo well. use your powers.

  75. I AM THE VICTIM by Gigant0r · · Score: 0, Troll

    I got kicked out of school for making a webpage about a class mate who had his website here on slashdot once. I don't regret it because I still think it was totally hilarious and that he was a nerd, and that's what's really important to me.

    1. Re:I AM THE VICTIM by ph43thon · · Score: 1


      this is on topic and absolutely perfect.. not sure why some whiney baby modded it Troll. It never ceases to amaze me how much pain some dork says he was caused by individuals he will refer to as idiots. If some dumbass meathead says you wear dorky clothes or that you have a little baby weewee, why do you care? Do you feel bad when a random dog barks or growls at you? Oh no, the dog doesn't like me!!?? why?!! I feel so bad. Note: this is in response to all the people who insist verbal abuse is as bad as or worse than physical abuse.

      I grew up around idiots in a small town, and I was keenly aware of their idiocy. If you're 7 years old I might feel bad for you, but once you hit middle school.. stop being such a pathetic crybaby. People crying about this shit are born betas. They can't even imagine how to live their lives without some "mean" alphajock keeping them down.



      p

  76. 5 years ago it was a problem too by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe it hasn't been solved by now...that was one whole president ago! Here's the old news.

  77. aww, they're so cute when they kiss by rhizome · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    dude, if you want to touch another guy, just ask them.

    otherwise, revenge is stupid and it only continues a cycle of violence. it doesn't matter if you don't have the imagination to eliminate the conflict from your life without violence, it's the violence that is lame. However, with a nick like "Lord Frodo" it may be a foregone conclusion that you view the world in terms of battle. it doesn't seem to matter to you that your bully (or his friends) just moved on to the next weakest kid.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    1. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      otherwise, revenge is stupid and it only continues a cycle of violence. it doesn't matter if you don't have the imagination to eliminate the conflict from your life without violence, it's the violence that is lame.

      Fuck that. You didn't live my life. I was there. I know what choices I had. I made the best choice for the situation that I was in. Period.

      it may be a foregone conclusion that you view the world in terms of battle.

      As opposed to what? A love in?

      it doesn't seem to matter to you that your bully (or his friends) just moved on to the next weakest kid.

      No, because when I got them off of my back, I looked out for others. Not all, in fact, not most, but I was able to protect some of the other kids.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While in general I agree, sometimes it is necessary to speak to someone in their own language. Sadly, there are some people in this world who can only understand a punch in the face.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by orionware · · Score: 1

      When I was a freshman in highschool there were two kids who would bother the shit out of me in gym class. they were both juniors and scared the shit out of me. This went on for months.

      One time (no not at band camp) I was taking abuse in front of a girl that I really liked. I snapped. Without time to give it a second thought I swung and connected. The guy bent over grabbing his nose and I full on place kicked him in the face. Breaking his nose and knocking out teeth...

      In the next 3 and a half years, no one said or did shit to me. Today I am married to that girl.

      Things are a little different today. if my son was being bullied I'm not sure I'd give him the same advice.. Kids these days are crazy.. I'd track the kid down myself and throw him a beating.

      Cycles of violence are usually stopped by violence. Bullies don't understand compassion or logic. A good full on beatin usually gives this lesser lifeform pause to think next time.

      --


      Karma means nothing to me, so suck it...
    4. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      One time (no not at band camp) I was taking abuse in front of a girl that I really liked. I snapped. Without time to give it a second thought I swung and connected. The guy bent over grabbing his nose and I full on place kicked him in the face. Breaking his nose and knocking out teeth.

      Yes!

      In the next 3 and a half years, no one said or did shit to me. Today I am married to that girl.

      Fuck Yes!!!!

      Things are a little different today. if my son was being bullied I'm not sure I'd give him the same advice.

      I concede that they're not "mine" per se, but I love my GF's kids as much as I would my own. I tell them all of the time that they have to stand up for themselves.

      Your mother and I can't fight your battles for you. Walk away if you can, if you can't give it your best.

      It's the best any of us can do.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    5. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by IndependentVik · · Score: 1

      otherwise, revenge is stupid and it only continues a cycle of violence.

      Says someone who was never picked on in school!

      Normally, I don't resort to name-calling on this forum, but I honestly can't help it this time, you self-righteous jackass.

      --
      I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
    6. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Just because you're still bitter doesn't mean I'm self-righteous. Your assumptions blind you.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    7. Re:aww, they're so cute when they kiss by rhizome · · Score: 1

      The exception doesn't prove the rule, buddy. The fact that you would elect to beat a child up speaks volumes about how lame your reasoning is. Good luck, hockey-dad.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  78. tough choice by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1

    Would I rather be beaten and shoved in a locker or made fun of on the internet. I'll take the internet any day. Then I will h4xx0r their boxes and have my uber-l33t revenge! PWNED! I say again, PWNED! So yeah, on the internet, my chances of fighting back go up slightly.

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  79. School bullying by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Yes this is a problem.
    Yes it should be taken care of.
    We already have some laws against this (harrassment)

    But I have a problem, particularly school justice.
    It isn't there. The teachers and administration do what they want, students have few rights, and little recourse.

    I know of many people who have been suspended or expelled on accusations that I know aren't true.
    The principal of my old high school bragged how he was above the law. He could suspend or expell a student if he felt like it. He didn't need any proof of anything.
    If you brought it to the school board, they wouldn't act "We stand behind our principals"

    We have a law against smoking on school property, he suspended students smoking "in sight of the school".

    This is overstepping yoru bounds, and it is wrong.

    The schools overstep their bounds, and are the bigger bullies.

    1. Re:School bullying by greymond · · Score: 1

      That happens sometimes... but as for the Smoking rules... the idea is that you supposed to be 18 to legally smoke, and if your smoking on school grounds or within site of the school it makes the school look bad by seeing a bunch of 16yr olds smoking their... As a smoker myself it's hard enough to tell people to piss off because I don't care about my health - it's another issue to tell people to piss off when they say i'm encouraging their kids to smoke.

      This is especiialy important when at a public place and i'm smoking. A couple with young child may be sitting near me - if they are I put out the cig, why? because it's proper ettiquette.

  80. An interesting bias to the replies by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it interesting that a lot of the replies here deal with "how nerds can get back at the cyberbullies".

    Very few, if any, are assuming that the nerds ARE the cyberbullies.

    Bullying is about strength. In the real world, that can be physical or political/social. In the internet, that can be technical prowess. He who hacks better, bullies better.

    1. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Very few, if any, are assuming that the nerds ARE the cyberbullies.

      There's quite a few cyberbullies here at Slashdot. I got sick of it after the last one and only post AC now.

    2. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He who hacks better, bullies better. "

      I don't see how this is true. Only very very remedial technical knowledge is needed to make a website, and using content style sheets isn't going to make it any more effective.

    3. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Shut up, you.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    4. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by Lifewish · · Score: 1
      Difference being that computer-related harrassment has comparatively little impact on those who aren't tech-savvy themselves. So nerds can only really bully other nerds this way. However, being punched in the face has the same effect whether you work out or not.

      If I'd wanted at school, I could have run an entire harrassment campaign against those who bugged me very easily. It would have had no effect. These were people who, by year 10, hadn't yet found out what their username was.

      And frankly, "cyberbullying" would be comparatively ineffective even against nerds. What one can break another can fix. And if all else fails there's always the "off" button. Life doesn't come with one of those, sadly.

      Compared to physical violence and the existing social tortures that our darling children invent, this new "cyberbullying" has minimal effect. So quit inventing new labels for digital extensions of playground gossip and invest in some karate lessons. You'll be spending your time a lot more effectively.

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    5. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take a hacker to make a slanderous web page.

    6. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by Casca · · Score: 1

      It is pretty unlikly the "nerds" are the cyberbullies. It only takes a couple of good ass whoopings behind the school to make a "nerd" stop putting stuff on a website. Its tough to hack when you can't type because your fingers are broken...

      --
      Casca
    7. Re:An interesting bias to the replies by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Very few, if any, are assuming that the nerds ARE the cyberbullies.

      Interesting point. The assumption here is that a bully is a bully, and whatever tools are available, bullies will use them.

      However bullies (in the physical sense), are usually not very smart. There are exceptions, of course, but that's generally the case. Utilizing technology to bully someone, and covering its tracks, requires certain intelligence and patience - virtues only a few bullies posses. So I agree with you that at least some cyberbullies are nerds.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  81. WHAT THE FUCK?! by greymond · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about the kids could grow some balls and learn to stand up for themselves. If someone makes a website making fun of them - you make a website making fun of them back or even better make fun of how shitty their site looks. If they annoy you on IM - BLOCK THEM. Add their email addy to a few porn sites or post it on your website and get them sent tons of spam.

    It's amazing how few parents teach their kids to defend themselves, but if someone hits you - YOU HIT BACK. If you don't you're just going to be fucked over for the rest of your life, or become a cop...

    1. Re:WHAT THE FUCK?! by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      i agree. The problem is the old christian "turn the other cheek" attitude. Turning the other cheek gets you slapped twice.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:WHAT THE FUCK?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you are half the size of the person threatening you? How about if half the class seems to have chosen you as a target? Your attempts to fight would fall on deaf ears.

    3. Re:WHAT THE FUCK?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You only need to take out the loudest one. And no matter how big they are any guy will go down when he's kicked in the balls, and any girl will get rocked when you grab her hair and pull her bitch head back and trip her.

    4. Re:WHAT THE FUCK?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....And retain the moral high ground....
      ....And avoid gun / knife / baseball bat-lead pipe-etc. violence in return....

      Jesus Christ is quoted as saying "The meek shall inherit the earth."....The ones in charge now have all but ruined this planet for everybody....

  82. MOD PARENT UP by jaaron · · Score: 1

    Seriously, any 'bullies' doing this really do open themselves up to a libel suit (it's libel not slander since it's printed). And though I'm not a parent, if I were and such bullying were happening to my child, I would seriously consider teaching such web-savvy youth that their comments in the public forum carry consquences.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be much worst for the kid? Then everyone would start saying, just loud enough for her to overhear, "Don't talk to so-and-so, her daddy might sue you!!!"

      Bulling only gets worst when parents get involved. Just tell kids to ignore it, and the bullies will move on to someone else after awhile.

  83. This guy is so off-base by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1
    So, I made a website about him.

    Just kidding, I actually agree with a lot of what the guy is saying. One bone I have to pick, though, is his conclusion:

    "Cyber-bullies have their victims on an electronic tether," Stutzky says. "The kids on the receiving end can't get out of range."

    I don't buy the whole "electronic tether" theory; all the kid has to do is hit the ignore button, or not view the webpage, or reject the e-mail, etc. to avoid harassment. If all else fails, he/she could just turn off the computer.

    1. Re:This guy is so off-base by Little+Brother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except for what happens if the entire rest of the school sees the webpage... Then the kid may as well move to an Amish settlement.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

    2. Re:This guy is so off-base by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 1

      But I fail to see the difference between the whole school seeing the webpage and the whole school hearing the rumor. The traditional rumor can be worse, too, in that it can evolve as it spreads, so that even more harmful things can be tacked on by whoever and will be treated as truth by the next person. A web page, on the other hand, is much more static and is typically the work of an individual or two, so that the target can know that there really is a very small minority who are attempting to harm them, whereas the rumor could be any number of people.

  84. Hmm.. by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    I've seen a lot of this in online games. Particularlly NWN, where people just let the situation get to their heads and take it too personal. Older player picking on new players and such. I've also seen it in FPS's on some servers.

    The thing kids should remember is it's just a game and you can turn off the bully any time you desier just by logging off or going to a differnt server and not mentioning where you go. Another thing is to hide your online presence if that option is availble. Makes it harder for you to get tracked.

    As for IM's, block sender and only allow people you authorize to contact you are great options. Websites are a little more difficult, and emails just add em to your blocked list.

    The worst thing is to let them get to you. Keep a cool level head and take the necessary steps to deal with the situation in a way that gives them the least amount of attention possible. They'll get bored and move on in most cases.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  85. Aha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revenge of the nerds!

  86. BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF THE BULLIES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously that's what I did. I broke a bully's arm after I just had enough of his crap. Funny how popular I became after I did that. Sure I got suspended for a couple days but I really didn't care. You should of heard the asshole crying to his mommy like a little girl too. Man I will always cherish that day.

  87. Bullies should be killed. With a knife in the eye. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Really. Just thinking about how someone can make someone else's life hell for no other reason than for the propping up of an immature personality, makes me so angry.

    I used to get picked on in school, and now 15 years later I thiink about it and laugh, but a part of me would Grand Theft Auto those motherfuckers in a second and not shed a tear.

    Sure, some may have 'grown up', but how many people that you know change that much from high school? Chances are, they're using the same techniques to bully their wives, children, co-workers, and others.

    I don't wonder at school shootings at all.

  88. This happened at my school... by marekbrz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone who is currently in high school, I believe I have a unique perspective on this. This actually did happen, to a few different people at my school. Sure, it was mean thing to do to those people. However, if was the bully, I would have considered it a success. Why? Because it got one hell of a reaction from the people who were made fun of.

    The main reason bullying happens is because it gets a rise out of people. Think about it: who are you most likely to bully?...the kid who you know will run crying and sobbing from the room when made fun of, or the kid who will just kind of shrug and laugh along with it.

    Today was a perfect example. My ears sort of stick out and turn red when I laugh. I was with a small group of people, and we were all laughing really hard about something...I was on the verge of tears. One of them pointed out that my ears were quite red, and I just kind of laughed along with them about it. I could of gotten all defensive about it, but all it would do is make me look like a complete weirdo, and would make me an easy target for bullies.

    I guess my point is, is it seems that most bullying occurs because of someone's differences. For example, the kid who is short, or has a funny voice, or whatever. However, all humans have a unique trait that makes them a little weird. By laughing along with it, you show people that it doesn't affect you. By getting defensive, all you do is make yourself a target.

  89. Lots of Similar Stories by CoolQ · · Score: 1

    Obligatory link...

    "HB-Rights.org - Student Off-Campus Web Sites and Computer Use"

    More discussion/links than you can shake a stick at.

    --Quentin

  90. what about bullying corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess this is bad unless the site is {InsertBigCorporationNameHere]sucks.com

  91. Cyber bullying on Slashdot by MsGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ironic that this would show up here on Slashdot because this kind of shit happens here all the time. Note: the vast majority of people here don't abuse this site...I have a small minority of abusers in mind as I write this.

    Let's face it, guys, cyberbullying happens here all the time...a few twits calling each other queer, indulging in the cyber equivalent of towel-snapping in the locker room, modding people down as "flamebait," "troll," and "overrated" just because you don't agree with them or they rub you the wrong way...the irony is so thick it's not even funny.

    MsGeek.Org closed down because of a group of cyberbullies and their extended attack on the site. Many of the people responsible still post here, and often. The crapflooders never have, and never will, provide anything of value on this site...they just shovel out the same crap, the same disgusting gay porn and disguised links to goatse and tubgirl. Someone needs to hit the entire lot of the crapflooders over their collective heads with a clue by four...it stopped being "cute" or "funny" years ago.

    I kicked the WIPO Troll off my site and got his account pulled because he posted hardcore gay porn pics to my board using an IE exploit. He came by it rightly. I specifically started MsGeek.Org to give women in technology a "clean, well-lighted" environment to post on a Slashdot-like forum. The crapflooders ruined that, up to and including running exploits against the board software itself. The security issues got to be so much for the good people at Hosting Matters that we mutually decided it wasn't worth it.

    I wish that Taco and Hemos and the rest of the founders here had the cojones to pull the accounts of those who have made posting here uncomfortable for many people. I have no problems dealing with it...I'm a 10-year Usenet veteran with the virtual purple hearts to prove it. But I have gotten emails from women who don't read Slashdot because the crap posts are so disturbing to them.

    Anyway, this is why I continue to have comments turned off on my journal. I wanted one place where I couldn't be shouted down by a small minority of obnoxious idiots, and I have it. I am sorry that the stupid yahoo.com address always gets filled up with spam and people can't get email to me there. I intend to find another webmail account with a bit more space so you have some way of contacting me. I might even break down and pay Yahoo for a bigger mailbox. Whatever.

    I was going to post this anonymously, but screw it...do your worst. Mod it down to Kingdom Come. I don't care anymore. Karma is worthless at this point anyway...I posted for awhile under an identity I used when posting from work, and it took me a grand total of 2 months to go from newbie to the 50 point cap. W00t. That account could have been used to troll like a mofo...instead, I retired it, Blade Runner stylee. I don't even remember the password on the account anymore, fuck it.

    I'll chime in every now and again, but right now the main reason I use this site is to blog. My /. journal almost like still having MsGeek.Org, the only diff is that someone else has to worry about security issues and assholes. It's too bad... /. used to be fun a few years ago.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Finuvir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really can't bring myself to believe that you don't know about slashdot's moderation system. I only read at 4 - except when I have mod points to throw around when I read at 3 - and I *never* see anything worse than posts that are too long for my diminished attention. No flames, no disturbing imagery, just interesting, insightful, informative and funny. No-one should be able to find offence in a 4 or 5 -rated slashdot post. The system works.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    2. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somewhat off-topic sidenote reply to something you mentioned in your post - I'm curious as to why you feel the need to segregate female geeks from the male. Just because I've got a vagina doesn't mean I need to be "protected," thanks much. I can take care of that fine on my own.

    3. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Morosoph · · Score: 1

      I see. This is presumably why you don't allow replies to your journal posts. I was disappointed with some of the replies to this Journal entry of mine, not that they're that bad, just unnecessary.

      In your position, I'd be inclined to get an account so that I could request "Friends and Friends of Friends only", or even "Friends only" for your journal entries, but I entirely respect your position, and I'm not saying that this is what you should do!

      It's a shame that there are such assholes about, but it's a large planet, and the assholes out there bait who they can, so you can expect a few to bait you (or me) occasionally.

      I'm not surprised that some of the troll posts are so offensive to women; when I had my ex-girlfriend come round to visit recently, I was showing her about slashdot, and although I avoided any potentially risky links, I started feeling scared on her behalf that one would turn up! She asked me "are such posts removed", and I explained "no they're just modded down", and explained the system of moderation. Whereas I'd be inclined to see this as healthy self-regulation, she saw it as irresponsibility on behalf of the editors.

      I'm sorry that your site was attacked in this way. It's unpleasant and unfortunate to see what some consider to be sport.

    4. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by djtack · · Score: 1

      No-one should be able to find offence in a 4 or 5 -rated slashdot post. The system works.

      The moderation system is irrelevant. I personally like to read replies to my posts, which pretty much requires me to lower my threshold. Presumably, since you are addressing the parent poster, you expect her to read your post - yet it is moderated +1 as I write this! In order to read your post, one has to wade through several other abusive replies with the same score.

      Reading at +4 would work if all you wanted to do was read the comments. But if you actually want post, reply, and participate in something, you are exposed to the crapflooders. The deeply nested comments are generally never moderated at all.

      I have used systems that don't tolerate abusive posters and crapflooders. But it generally comes at the cost of privacy - they work by having very high standards of accountability, and require you to verify your real identity before getting an account (you can be pseudonymous to the other participants, but the operators must know your real identity). Abusers are swiftly booted (and their posts deleted), and it is sufficiently difficult to get another account that people don't.

    5. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by ph43thon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It slightly humorous that your main complaint is about how neither you nor your site host could secure msgeek.org from a horde of morons. As one replier mentioned, on slashdot, just browse at +4 (or even +2 IMO).. and how do you suppose a site like The Well survives? Quite plainly, you think obnoxious idiots should be against the law (forgive my weakness for hyperbole) or that someone else should protect your website... It's like opening a store, leaving the backdoor unlocked and bemoaning the fact that some punk teenagers walked in and posted rude S&M photos all over the walls.

      Lock your doors. The world is full of idiots.


      p

    6. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not everyone feels the same way you do about everything.

      Whoa, crazy.

    7. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      but assholes are everywhere. how do you deal with them in real life? the first time i saw goatse i didnt like it. now if i get tricked into viewing it i just laugh because i fell for it.

      you are taking the internet way too seriously. so some newbie gets offended by penisbird or animal love -- how do you think you grow up and become desensitized to all that shit? by ignoring it? its not like its going to go away.

      the moderation system is really messed up but its the best we got. if you had slashdot editors deleteing people deemed 'not societaly acceptable', well i for one would not like it if i had to watch what i say for fear of big brother. do you think the editors should dictate what is 'right'? do you think anyone should make this decision for you?

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    8. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Whereas I'd be inclined to see this as healthy self-regulation, she saw it as irresponsibility on behalf of the editors.

      Slashdot's self-moderation system is the major reason I still visit this site, and others of its type. The upside of knowing that /.'s speech is completely uncensored gives me a warm-fuzzy that keeps me coming back, despite the smaller downside of some AnonymousMorons.

      Forums with "moderator-nazi's" just leave a sour taste in my mouth. I feel like I'm in highschool again with all the moderator brown-nosing, post deletions/moves, stern warnings, and whatnot (kind of like IRC).

      I hope you managed to explain to your girlfriend that the net doesn't need top-down command and control to function.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    9. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by maddmaster · · Score: 1

      Who ever said that life was fair? Quit whining and do something learn to defend yourself. This is the real world Ma'am not some idealistic virtual imagination. It is right to complain but don't whine coz your making me cry, bully!!!.

      --
      Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
    10. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Cool now that we know your a girl [or that A girl is here!] we can beg you to date us! The guy-girl ratio is like 100:1 here! As a guy I wouldn't say that /. remotely represents female interests beyond what's general; loving Linux, hating MS, robots, etc. Unless you'd say that your interests are accurately reflected as CPUs, [hating MS], guns,[loving Tux], Natalie Portman, [hating ms], SciFi, [searching for Hatalie naked] faster CPUs, and bigger Guns ...get the idea!

    11. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I protest! I am not a moron!

    12. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up

    13. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Morosoph · · Score: 1
      I hope you managed to explain to your girlfriend that the net doesn't need top-down command and control to function.
      I sort-of managed to explain it, but she's not a natural libertarian. I guess that slashdot and its ilk are simply sites that she wouldn't use.

      "No deletes" gives me a sense of clarity, rather than warmth and fuzziness, since I know that what I'm getting is representative; I am interacting with people as they are, rather than the sense of falseness that a "moderator-nazi" policy would induce. As a mathematician, I very much value such clarity!
    14. Re:Cyber bullying on Slashdot by Finuvir · · Score: 1

      The moderation system is irrelevant. I personally like to read replies to my posts, which pretty much requires me to lower my threshold. Presumably, since you are addressing the parent poster, you expect her to read your post - yet it is moderated +1 as I write this! In order to read your post, one has to wade through several other abusive replies with the same score.

      That's a very good point, and one I hadn't considered. I don't tend to post very often; I read the story and whatever high-rated commments are there the first time around. I rarely go back to a topic once I'm finished.

      But the parent of my first post seems to be saying that she doesn't use the site for anything but blogging anymore ("I'll chime in every now and again, but right now the main reason I use this site is to blog."), that once the participation is gone, so is everything else. (Although she's posted 21 times so far this month, so maybe that statement is a little less than accurate.) I wanted to point out that the option was still there to read the high-rated comments and get some value out of the site while ignoring the 'cyberbullies'. I stand by this, but I acknowledge that participation would be hampered by them.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  92. umm start with the photographer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Jodi found out about the website when a fellow pupil tried to take a photograph of her with a digital camera and said it was for the web. She said: "I was really hurt because I did not know who'd done it. I was just really upset.""

    Umm, sounds to me like she has a confession.

  93. I think you forgot to consider this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I will steal your ride and then run you over with it.

    After completing the necessary road scrapage operation to remove your still-warm remains, I will FedEx them to your next of kin for prompt disposal.

    You may elect to have the recently deceased Fred Rogers (of Mister Rogers' Neighborhood fame) urinate copiously on your corpse before allowing Rodney Dangerfield to desecrate what little remains of your anal region with various implements of nastification.

  94. +1, funny as hell by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    OK I hereby nominate the parent as the root of a bunch of "yo mama so fat" jokes.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  95. Is this new? Anyone watch American Pie? by ryan76 · · Score: 1

    This was in a movie! Why is this news? Its in both Boston Public & American Pie.

    --
    http://threetechguys.info Come, discuss Technology. Got a technology question? Come ask!
  96. Leave websites like this alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you can guess from me reading slashdot, I wasn't exactly the most popular kid in school. Nevertheless, I have to say that I'd rather see this website stand than be taken down.

    Sure, it sucks for you if someone hates you and puts up a web site about it, but you know what... take some flak and ignore the damn thing. It's not like it matters. Learning not to care what random people think about you is an important life lesson, and not one that your parents should deprive you of by suing the pants off someone who calls you names.

  97. What a load of horse droppings by antis0c · · Score: 1

    "Cyber-bullies have their victims on an electronic tether," Stutzky says. "The kids on the receiving end can't get out of range."

    Sure they can. They can just not care.

    The single most important advice I ever received as a child about bullies is just ignore them. It's simple advice we all can use.

    There is no way school policy can extend into the Internet and the Home. How can the school enforce a policy to ban say websites that make fun of kids and teachers when said website doesn't exist on any of the school's servers and was created in a persons free time? Impossible! (save for libel though.)

    With the exception of extreme circumstances (which applies to anything), the best way to deal with bullies is to ignore them. It's not fun making fun of someone if they just don't give a damn. Hell make a website saying how stupid and gay I am. If I don't care, get upset about it or let it affect my life in any way, how long is it going to remain funny to do?

    Another middle school girl received text messages about her choice of shoes: "Where did your mommy buy those shoes -- the bargain basement?" Girls tend to be bullied most about their appearance and their choice of clothes, Stutzky notes.

    Wow. Words can really hurt. Grow up, just say "Yeah" or simply "No" and move on.

    --

    ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
    1. Re:What a load of horse droppings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your experience was quite different from mine.
      It's hard to ignore someone that is literally breaking your bones, stealing your bicycle directly out from under you, or stading in a group circle around you taking turns kicking you after you're already on the ground.

    2. Re:What a load of horse droppings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you must really have been a loser. I would have been laughing at you on the sidelines.

      Why didn't your parents do anything, or why didn't you learn martial arts? Come on man!

  98. I submitted this story months ago by RighteousFunby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...same links and all. Sorry about the off topic-ness, but this sort of thing gets to me.

  99. I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by t0qer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the producers of cheaters should start a new show.

    BULLIES!!

    Parents who have a kid that's being bullied can call up the shows producers. The producer then sends a private investigator with a video camera (and maybe a couple gorilla's in case things go bad) to follow the victum around school and after school with hidden video camera's.

    Bully gets caught on tape. Shows producers go to bully's parents and say "Let us use this tape or we give it to the victums parents to SUE YOUR ASS FOR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT!! Bullies parent gladly signs away the rights to avoid civil and possible criminal court time. Bully get's publically humiliated on national TV.

    Nothing takes a bully down quicker than public humiliation.

    1. Re:I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Finally, a reality show I'd actually watch!

    2. Re:I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by Ixitar · · Score: 1

      Same here. Hey Wil Wheaton, anyone you know would be interested in this idea?

    3. Re:I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by gsfprez · · Score: 1

      t0qer..

      email me at hairapplehair@hairgsfhair.hairorghair - cut hair to email me.

      i sooo want to talk to you about pitching this idea....

      --
      guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    4. Re:I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "bullies" is politically incorrect - it implies that they are of animal intellegence and are incapable of preventing themselves from doing so.

      Instead, use the term "child abusers". Aside from being a recognized in the court of 'law and justice', it is a completely accurate description of the target persons in question.

    5. Re:I smell a new hit reality show!!BULLIES! by sandow · · Score: 1

      Nothing causes public outrage faster than surreptitiously video taping children without their parent's permission.

  100. Re: transparent society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For an interesting take of how such a society might develop, and its effects on all of us, read "The Light of Other Days" by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter:

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/08 12 576403/qid=1069105228/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-615624 7-0864719?v=glance&s=books

    Imagine if you could sit at your web browser and look at any place on (or off) Earth, anyone, anywhere, anytime... Privacy becomes an ancient memory and secrets are hard to keep.

  101. Have You Lunch Money In My PayPal Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Have your lunch money in my Pay-Pal account by the end of the school day or else I will tell the RIAA that you are downloading copyrighted music.

  102. Expert advice forthcoming by Qrlx · · Score: 1

    With all the -1 posts about Rob taking it up the ass from Kathleen, you'd think our gracious hosts here at Slashdot would be able to provide some unique insight on the subject of being cyber-bullied.

  103. Oh no. It's just like before! by taybin · · Score: 1

    Oh no! The INTERWEB is letting people act in the same replusive manners they always have! Lock up your children! But not in the room with the computer!!

  104. I was cyberbullied in 1985 by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    Someone posed as me on a BBS in 1985 and said a whole bunch of really nasty things about a girl who I was friends with. It happened one weekend when my parents forced us to go out of town to visit some loser relative. So, the first I knew about it was when a bunch of people wanted to kick my ass and several girls who I had been friends with wouldn't speak to me. I was never even able to convince these people I didn't do it.

    It was on an old Apple II BBS. I suppose there are lots of ways someone could have gotten my password.

    Anyway, it was pretty awful. I lived in a very small town (we had just moved there) and all the kids that were into computers hated me after that. So, I got into other things, suffered through 4 years of High School, and got the hell outta there.

    Sometimes I wonder why anyone would have done such a mean thing to me for no reason. People can be really vicious.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:I was cyberbullied in 1985 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      See, this is what I don't understand.

      You said they had been friends-- friends would have realized you didn't do that. They wouldn't straight-up cold-shoulder you; a friend would say, "Hey, soft guy, which tard posted that shit and put your name on it?" A friend would 1) know that you didn't write it, 2) Even if they had a feeling you might have posted it, they'd believe you when you said you didn't, and 3) Would help you clear your name.

      If they did none of the above, then you were right to get out of Dodge, because those weren't friends.

  105. .columbine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what future attacks on the net will be the result of this bullying?

  106. This is all the fault of Parents by Spl0it · · Score: 0, Troll

    Parents these days (not all but enough of them) do not provide their own kids with the instruction, guidance and a loving home that children need. All the bullies at my school were kids with bad home lives, or poor role models / un-educated parents. As for the kids being teased, instead of waiting for the end of school why not be proactive, use the insults as fuel to get in better shape, or to practice sports so you can join a sports team and fit in better. If you don't want to play sports or get in shape, find something else to do with another group from the school. I think the best thing a teased kid can do with the insults and/or threats is use them as fuel.

    Fuel to get better at ...

    Those violent gun episodes in schools where a bullied kid attacks another student is not only the fault of the bully but the fault of the victum and his parents. The victum for failing to think of the consiquences and for failing to turn the negative situation into positive. The parents fault for failing to notice the childs obvious problems and as well they're inability to instill values and morals into their own childs character. The other half of the problem relies on the bully and his/her parents. Where are they? if the school or other parents have contacted them why havn't they resolved this situation, and morally the bully has to understand what bully'ing is like... maybe his parents should bully him for a day and teach him a lesson? open his eyes? I'm not sure? but I think at least 60% of the blaim is on the parents (both victum and agressor) and the rest lay on the children.

    --

    No, this is
    1. Re:This is all the fault of Parents by Spl0it · · Score: 1

      Parent is hardly a troll, its my opinion from growing up. I'm 21 now and I know what it is like to be targeted at a school or in the community by other children.

      --

      No, this is
  107. The worst part of this... by Bonewalker · · Score: 1
    is that this kind of bullying moves society further in the direction of mistrust and perceived deception.

    One can imagine school kids today afraid to use public restrooms or lockerrooms, wary of legitimate picture-taking (like for the yearbook), and never giving out phone numbers, or email addresses, or IM id's, constantly googling their own names looking for threats or hate-sites about them.

    It is very disheartening. But, with the rise of technology, society must learn to adapt. And it will, by closing in on itself. But, I agree with many posters earlier statement regarding parental control.

    What this really means is we have to learn to be better parents and teach others how to be better parents, at a time when parenting skills are seemingly at an all-time low.

  108. Inside thoughts/Outside thoughts by TheTick · · Score: 1

    Before the blogs, etc., there was a clear delineation between personal thoughts and public thoughts. Things you wrote down in a journal weren't meant for public consumption.

    But now you can write something in a blog, broadcasting it essentially to the whole freakin' world, and say, "These were my private thoughts! I feel so violated!" That sends my BS meter right off the scale.

    Now, I'm the first to say schools should not censor off-campus speech. That just seems like a given to me. It's wrong. At the same time, I say, use some common sense. Remember, when you're writing in a blog, you're talking to the entire world. Don't say anything you don't want everyone to hear. It will be archived and it will come back to haunt you. Welcome to the real world.

    --

    --
    bachiatari na torisetsu o yome!

  109. this is only a test by drteknikal · · Score: 1

    don't look here, look over there. there's nothing happening here.

    --
    http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
  110. No emails from people they don't already know? by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems that you belive that by stopping your child from seeing profianities in their typed form is protecting them. As if they don't hear worse at school.

    And I dissagree with your comments, that children should be taught not to talk to unknown people online. I believe that the ability to converse with people they have never met, and most likely will never meet, is one of the most important things your child can be taught.

    Thanks to the Internet, your child can make acquaintances with people from a multitude of countries, beliefs, and religions. They can learn about cultures, differences between societies, and problems or struggles people experience in everyday life. And they can do this safely.

    There are still people who would rather deny their child communication with "online strangers" than educate their child about doing so responsibly. There are still parents who know so little about the Internet that they will accept the miconception that all "chat rooms" are undeground grooming places for paedophiles. Five minutes of guidance is enough to make your child understand that joining #12yroldz on AOL and repeatedly asking "wanna cyber?" is a bad idea.

    The key is making your child *understand* that people hidden behind a chat room can lie. Simple as that. They need to be taught to keep their online acquaintances seperate from the real world. Make them understand that they WILL meet people who will try to harm them. With a little education, the Internet becomes a "virtual sandbox". Your child will be exposed to people - both good and bad, in a controlled and safe enviroment. There is no better way to teach your child about human nature.

    I say this from personal experience. I am presently 18. During my 'childhood' I had always enjoyed the freedom of unrestricted online communication. I belive the results from this are only positive. I have learned so much, from so many...

    My lifetime passion has always been programming. While in the 'real world', very few of the people around me shared this interest, online I was able to find a haven. I was able to interact with hundreds of thousands of people who not only shared my interests, but were willing to share their knowledge. I learnt to share my knowlede in return. I could collaborate on projects with people I had never met. It didn't matter that I was 12, noone knew or cared. My age was irrelevant. It was an environment in which skin color, gender, age, and nationallity are all irrelevant. A place where knowledge, contribution, and respect are honoured.

    This has changed my approach in the real world. In a society where racism and religious discrimination are commonplace, children learn the negative attitudes from their peers. Having made contacts in practically every country, I didn't give in to the temptation to tag along. I actually knew the societies and people which others would criticise for no other reason than "because they're different".

    I don't believe that your child will have their mind warped by pornography or bad language on the internet. If you believe they won't be exposed to these two 'evils' at their schools, you have perhaps lost contact with reality. The difference is that in the online world, attacking people with profanities results in rejection from a community, rather than cheap support from immature peers. The "u wanna fuck?" messages are frowned upon - "I'm sorry, I'd rather not sustain a sexual relationship over a 56k modem link".

    I learnt, from first-hand experience, that trust takes years to build, and seconds to break. I learned to respect others, not because it was 'forbidden' to be disrespectful, but because mutual respect is what created the greatest acheivements and communities. I learned how to act when in a position of power, how to diminish rather than fuel dissagreements. Online communities, be they forums, IRC channels, or simply e-mail, have one thing in common; they are environments in which decisions aren't made with fists or knives, but via wit, intellect, and understanding. If children weren't sheided from this "for their own protection", they would grow to become better people.

    1. Re:No emails from people they don't already know? by xenoandroid · · Score: 1
      This is one of the best comments I've read in a while. I'm currently 17 and have always had to keep the fact that I talk to "online strangers" secret from my mother (my father knew though and actually encouraged it the day we had an ISP). I've had good values and common sense instilled in me by my parents, unfortunately one of them is too frightened by the news of some idiot kid who thought it would be a good idea to go on a plane trip to some stranger's house without talking to somebody about it first.

      Raising your kid right will keep them safer than any "parental controls" or "computer rules".

    2. Re:No emails from people they don't already know? by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod right now. That's one of the most sensible posts I've heard for a long time.

      Seems that recent parents don't know what 'wrapping them up in cotton wool' means, and why it's bad.

      Your post expresses that perfectly.

      Must everyone learn 'the hard way' rather than by other people's mistakes?

      Going by the repeated wars and... heh... people subscribing to AOL despite opposite advice... I'd say yes :(

  111. If they weren't children... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A couple things to think about in regard to 'children' in schools and 'bullying'.

    Children are

    • Legally required to be in school
    • Unable to access law enforcement for all but the most serious crimes comitted by their peers
    • Subject to the daily realities of theft, slander and assault
    • All but immune to persecution for theft, slander and assault
    • Legally required to face their assailants/theives the next day
    • Legally required to face their victims the next day
    • They have known nothing else

    Worse, it's up to the victim's parents whether or not to act... leaving those with the worst homelives the most vulnerable... either to bullying or being bullied.

    IMHO, if you can legally require the separation of the bully from the victim, you may have really helped one kid.

    I also think the comment in the article that "... while these comments may seem silly to people who have matured, they are very devastating to the young people on the receiving end..." ignores the above reality.

    It's tough to draw analogies to adult life, but what if you were legally required to show up for work? What if somebody spread a similarly scandalous rumour about you at work? Oh... let's see... while kids might think it cool to grab a peer's breasts, the reverse might just work for adults. So, your coworker starts telling people that you grabbed her breasts, and you're making passes at her all the time. So your coworkers begin to shun you. You can't quit... you're legally required to be there. You can't call the police, they won't do anything because this is just a little bit of workplace bullying. Now your boss... who happens to be 150% of your height, twice your strength and twice your weight, might just believe the person spreading the scandal, so it will be your word against theirs.

    Your friends at work no longer want to be seen with you, because anyone can fall victim to such harassment... so you become ostracised... Some even join in to dispel rumours that they too might be perverts. Few people really believe the rumours, but they know you're not a safe person to be around because you... and anyone you're around is a target.

    Seeing that you have no allies, people begin to pick on you, steal your office supplies, scratch your car, slash your tires.

    So you keep going to work, despite all this, because you're legally forced to.

    Now we're getting close except: kids don't get paid, have little control over their homelife and they've never known anything else.

    1. Re:If they weren't children... by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
      Hmmm....
      but what if you were legally required to show up for work?
      Sounds like the military to me. I'm not in the service, but what you described sounds a lot like what I hear about the United States military (and that includes from friends/coworkers who are active). Any servicemen out there with anything to say about the paralells I inferred from the parent? Any insights the schools could use?
    2. Re:If they weren't children... by elmegil · · Score: 1
      I knew a guy once who was harassed mercilessly in boot camp, got a reputation as a whiner based on his complaints about said harassment, and ended up with a dishonorable discharge. Yes, he was a complete geek (so was I). Did he deserve this treatment? Hell no. Did he have any recourse? Of course not.

      Why do you think things like Tailhook and the scandals at the Academy are still happening?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:If they weren't children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pete when did you go to boot camp?

    4. Re:If they weren't children... by elmegil · · Score: 1
      pete when did you go to boot camp?

      Try again slowly: I knew a guy who was harassed in boot camp. I think you put the emPHAsis on the wrong sylLAble, or in this case, wrong clause. I didn't know a guy in boot camp who was harassed. I knew a guy who was harassed in boot camp, where he was, and I was not.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:If they weren't children... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy once who was harassed mercilessly in boot camp,

      DIs are required to make boot camp a harassful experience. Anyone who can't take it isn't considered tough enough... whiners aren't welcome.

      I think this has become in some ways stronger since the end of drafting (even though in other ways, DIs are now monitored more closely about injury and Political Correctness). Now that all recruits are volunteers, there'd more of a uniformity of opinion within the camp. You don't get a random sampling of the population that brings in diverse types to stand with the oddball and prove he's not alone.

      And there's the genuine point soldiers must trust each other with their lives- if someone can't make a social connection, he brings risk to the battlefield.

    6. Re:If they weren't children... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy who was harassed in boot camp, where he was, and I was not.

      That's actually a more ambiguous sentence than your original one. "where he was, and I was not" could be referring either to "being harassed" or "being in boot camp".

    7. Re:If they weren't children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, so you know a guy who says that happened to him. his perception, particularly about a humiliating experience might not quite jibe with reality, eh?

    8. Re:If they weren't children... by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Here's my non-mod point moderation.

      Excellent post. This is a serious problem that does not affect the kids, this is a serious problem that affects the adults of 10 years from now. I'm not sure why it seems to be an emerging problem in the extreme cases, but nonetheless it is a serious problem.

    9. Re:If they weren't children... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      It's kind of hard to jump from a "nonreality" circumstance to assault. Given what I know of the person, and what I know of the "military environment" from others who have been in the military, the simplest explanation of the facts is that he was indeed harassed and assaulted. Do I think he responded in a way that would have aggravated the situation? Absolutely, he was an insufferable geek (which actually gives some credence to his claims for exactly that reason). Do I think he may have exaggerated some? Quite likely. Do I think he was generally factual in his description of events though? Certainly. Given that I was younger, still in High School, not in any position to do anything for him (i.e. my sympathy was worth zero, we were just chess buddies when he needed to get away from a rotten home life) and he didn't just rant about it every time I saw him (i.e. an ongoing sympathy ploy) I am inclined to believe the outlines if not the complete scope of the details. I'm sure the dishonorable discharge was mostlikely for desertion or some such, but I can't say that I'd have responded much better to even half of his experience.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    10. Re:If they weren't children... by elmegil · · Score: 1
      I should mention that the harassment described did not come from anyone responsible for pushing the recruits, but rather from his fellow recruits. Aside from that, honestly, I think he would have made a lousy soldier; nonetheless, I don't think allowing fellow recruits to harass and beat on him was appropriate.

      Regardless, the Military is a poor comparison point for school. Military does have a legimitate interest in the indoctrination to harsh circumstances. School does not, certainly not when it comes to the harassment and intimidation aspects under discussion.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    11. Re:If they weren't children... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      What exactly did Private Pyle do to make people harass him? Was he caught hiding a jelly donut?

    12. Re:If they weren't children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      !!HONK!!

      That's the sound of your nose being tweaked.

    13. Re:If they weren't children... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Regardless, the Military is a poor comparison point for school. Military does have a legimitate interest in the indoctrination to harsh circumstances.

      No, just indoctrination in general.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:If they weren't children... by fizbin · · Score: 1
      Children are

      * Legally required to be in school
      Unless, of course, the parents of said children decide to take the responsibility of educating their own children away from the state and pull them out of the hostile environment. Every state in the US legally allows homeschooling. Starting homeschooling with middle- or high-school aged children may be significantly more difficult than starting with 5 yr. olds, but it can (and has) been done.

      Take away the legal requirement to be in school, the forced confrontations, and this issue almost completely evaporates.
  112. tatesless joke by SQLz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, you can always fight back by showing up to school with a a trenchcoat and some semi automatic rifles and just take out the people that are bothering you....oh wait.

  113. Yeah by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    No matter how you slice it, children are vicious little animals. Parents who try to treat the situation as if they were anything else will only be doing their children a disservice. In school you can either be at the top of the food chain or downtrodden, and being hampered in your ability to defend yourself will only insure your position at the bottom of the barrel, beaten up by everyone else. School administrators are god damn hippies and try to change this. Parents are idiots and like to pretend the problem doesn't exist.

    Ultimately it's the child that has to deal with the problem. Once he starts standing up for himself, bullies quickly lose interest and look for weaker prey. The most useful thing a parent can do for his child is to teach him to fight back at all costs. Attempting any other solution would be useless.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yeah by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      No matter how you slice it, children are vicious little animals.

      So are adults, we're just more discrete.

    2. Re:Yeah by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I think you meant discreet.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Yeah by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1

      True. Well spotted.

    4. Re:Yeah by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      I can think of two literary examples; Lord of the Flies and Stranger in a Strange Land. Read not if you don't wish spoilers.

      The first, of course, is Lord of the Flies. My English teachers never quite understood the significance of the descriptions of the guns that the Naval officers were carrying, the weapons mounted on the boat; the only reason those kids got re-civilized is that somebody bigger came along.

      The second is from Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land; Mike sees a big monkey beat on a medium size monkey, for fun, who then goes and beats on a little monkey, to assuage his ego. He then finally groks people.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  114. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is reading that post, then reading your sig.

  115. corepirate nazi softwar gangsters befuddled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like they'll say almost anything to get in the funnIE paypers now:

    Featured Article Sponsored by IBM

    Gates Unveils Junk E-Mail Software

    Associated Press
    Microsoft Corp. Chairman Bill Gates has announced new junk e-mail filtering technology called SmartScreen at his keynote address at the annual Comdex trade show in Las Vegas...

    must be a joke/another MiStake?

  116. front page by theMerovingian · · Score: 2, Funny
    Does Front Page Express still come free with Windows?


    Yeah, I use it to make my Slashdot posts.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  117. Typical love-fest article: no punishment discussed by mdpowell · · Score: 1

    None of the suggestions for schools (or parents) involve actually doling out punishments to the bullies. Very typical to tell the victim to "ignore it" or "chin up" while not punishing the bully.

    If schools would actually punish bullies (for actions committed on school grounds or using school equipment), it would help greatly. And it would reduce the need for victims to need to learn to fight back in self defense. (Self-defense is seen as a negative by many of the same authorities that refuse to punish the offenders--ref. the giant subthread above on the good and bad of self defense.)

    In 7th-grade (1991) I had to fight tooth and nail to get two bullies suspended for one day each. It involved my parents, their parents, 2-3 teachers, and 2-3 principals. That was a slap on the wrist punishment, but it kept those two away from me permanently.

    We could actually deter bullies if real punishments (long suspensions resulting in class failure, expulsions, small claims judgements for out-of-school offenses) were doled out for serious offenses.

  118. Umm.... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
    How about the kids could grow some balls and learn to stand up for themselves

    The very last thing a teenage girl needs, is for the bullying webpage to let the world know that she grew a pair.

    1. Re:Umm.... by Excen · · Score: 1

      The very last thing a teenage girl needs, is for the bullying webpage to let the world know that she grew a pair.

      And why would they be ashamed of a thing like that? Fat deposits in the right areas turn men into jello. She, the girl in your hypothetical situation, should flaunt them and learn how to effectively do so as quickly as possible. It can only improve her standing in the social heirarchy.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    2. Re:Umm.... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      read what *I* quoted. Sigh, I just *knew* someone would misinterpret what "pair" I was referring to.

  119. electronic trail by peter303 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Web pages, phone calls, some IMs and chat rooms leave a trail to identify the culprit. Its harder to be truely anonymous online.

  120. Libel? by sprekken · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the offense? Posting lies and threats against another person in written form is illegal, and can be prosecuted.

    I'm a bit confused why there hasn't been any mention of legal action against these kids if, in fact, they are posting libelous content. I'm sure that the threat of legal action would do more to deter this type of behavior than any school policies could.

    Any lawyers care to comment? Non-lawyers?

  121. Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Insightful



    Just as I would imagine was the _alot_ of guys here, I too got picked on when I was in Junior High. For years..Got randomly spit on, punched, kicked, you name it..by a group of about 3 or 4 of em, all older than me. It was a real blast, lemmie tell ya.

    Then one day, I decided I about had enough, picked up a desk, and sent it crashing straight down ontop of one of them. Crushed his larynx. He couldn't talk for months, and even when he regained his speech, he sounded like Popeye. Karma works in mysterious ways.

    Anyway, back to the story. I got taken by no less than three teachers down to the Principal's office, where I was given a "5 day out-of-school suspension".. One notch below formal expulsion back in those days. Interestingly, my folks backed me up, and essentially told the school to fuck off, since I had no prior record of doing anything even remotely like that, the school knew this kid was a bully, and never bothered to do anything about him. Bottom line, I was back in school within a day...And even more interestingly, I never had a problem with any of the other bullies after that. Didn't hear a single peep.

    Thats not to say I advocate violence. I don't. But if you're dealing with what amounts to a juvenille sociopath who's parents can't control him, and a school who won't protect your kid, then that's what you have to do.

    I really, really don't understand how we, as a culture, arrived at the idea that we should expect our kids to "just ignore them", or "talk it out" with a bully. That has never, and will never solve anything. At the end of the day, you have a God-given right to defend yourself and your dignity. End of story.

    I'm going to be a father myself, pretty soon..And if theres anything i'd want my kid to learn from my experience, it would be that if ever gets bullied, and decides to beat the snot out of some kid to reclaim a portion of his dignity, Mom & Dad will back him up on it. Ultimately, he has to learn how to handle confrontations in life. Somewhere along the line, they're going to have to learn what "nobody walks all over you without your permission" means.

    It just seems my whole generation was brought up to think that "ball your fist up and teach the asshole a lesson" isn't an option.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      Very nice. Is the Popeye thing permanent? Now that would be hilarious.

    2. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I really, really don't understand how we, as a culture, arrived at the idea that we should expect our kids to "just ignore them", or "talk it out" with a bully. That has never, and will never solve anything.

      I've got to disagree. While I've had a similar experience to yours, it was valuable for me to go through all courses of action available to me before I had to resort to violence. It was a great lesson to me about what my limits were, when I had to take matters into my own hands, and when I could trust others.

      If you counsel kids to just skip to violence, they'll never learn anything, the bullies will be able to justify their actions, and there will be a lot more violence.

    3. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      "It just seems my whole generation was brought up to think that "ball your fist up and teach the asshole a lesson" isn't an option."

      you didn't grow up in Boston, I'll hazard a guess.
      just because it didn't dawn on you until _after_ bullying happened doesn't mean that the same happened to your *entire* generation.

      (although I'm going to guess our ages aren't similar)

    4. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by rritterson · · Score: 1

      While the bully was most likely an asshole, I find your seemingly proud attitude toward the permanant harm of someone else unnerving...

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    5. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon - First, everybody gets picked on in Jr. high / high school. Period. Find one person who didn't and I'll show you a liar. Even the jocks, even the most popular cheerleaders got picked on by someone. And I'd be willing to bet good money that even the most picked-on of us picked on someone else at some point. Felt bad about, never did it again, but did it. The popular kids probably showed less conscience for doing it, but they are not without their scars either so let's all quit playing the triumphant victims.

      [don't mean to be do direct but I find /. a little trying on this subject because the 'holier' attitude is little hypocritical for a crowd so bent on personal integrity.]

      Now, I assume that you told your parents about the bully before almost killing him (which is probably why your folks told the school to fuck off), and I imagine that someone ratted you out for almost killing that kid. If you'd have killed him, where do you think you'd be right now? Just making parole? Tough call, but if you ask me you got lucky - and I'm guessing that little stunt bought you years of relished infamy at your school (which is why no one bothered you again)...

      With that said, I hope my kid never has to fight anyone, but if she does, I hope it's justified, and I hope she gives it everything she's got and more so she never has to do it again. Some people need to get hit. And hard.

      Finally - on topic - if some other shit in my kid's school starts up one of these websites, I'll pay to have someone rat them out. And then may God help them and their family, because while violence may be a last resort, it's not off the list of options, and it comes in pretty much even with litigation. Being an adult doesn't mean the 'balled fist' doesn't apply to you. In fact, I'd suggest that it's even more applicable since your the example your kids will follow. Thus - if your a dick, and your teaching your kids to be dicks, and you get your teeth knocked out (all of them), maybe your kids will learn that being a dick just gets your teeth knocked out.

    6. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not to say I advocate violence. I don't. But if you're dealing with what amounts to a juvenille sociopath who's parents can't control him, and a school who won't protect your kid, then that's what you have to do.

      No you don't....

      Your parents could have simply kept you at home and raised A BIG STINK with the Board Of Education to resolve the matter. If there was no satisfaction there, your parents could have complained to the levels of 'higher ups' over the Board Of Education and/or take the story public with the media (newspapers, TV, radio)....

      Unrestrained, spontaneous violence is not necessarily the answer.... That should be restricted to (un)declared warfare and 'pre-violent' situations during 'peacetime' where people's lives are truly at stake....

    7. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your self congratulatory tone shows that you in fact do condone violence. I pray that you have grown enough to be a father to your child.

    8. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



      Considering this guy ended up having the full weight of a 35 pound metal desk-chair slammed on his throat... :) My guess is, yeah, he probably still sounds like Popeye.

      His voice remained fucked up for the remainder of Junior High, and all the way through High School... (This happened in 1988) He sounded alot like the "Ned" character from South Park, but, we didn't have South Park back then. :)

      I wasn't aiming for his throat or anything specifically.. I just picked up my desk and went to smash it straight down on him. He turned to deflect it when it came down, and caught the blunt edge of the desk right across the throat.

      Cheers,

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    9. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

      If you knew what this kid was doing to me in the moments prior to having my desk slammed ontop of him, you might feel differently...Not to mention what him and his friends had done in the months prior.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    10. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      I was brought up to not wait for time to pass while getting punched, spit on, whatever. Punch and spit people back, and you won't come to the point where you're throwing desks on people.

      The new generation of dweebs seems to be content with bottling up frustration about getting picked on, then in some dramatic fashion, get on with payback.

      The solution is to teach kids (like I learned) that fighting back to begin with will save you a LOT of trouble in the future.

    11. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the hassle I got from girls finally stopped once I punched one of them in the head. I guess I got tired of having my locker trashed, books trashed and getting smacked over the head with dictionaries. The even more violent hassle I got from the guys stopped rather mysteriously. I found out ten years later that word got out that I was carrying a knife. Still, what the years of abuse did to me still affects my social and emotional responses today. Where were the teachers and the parents, especially mine? Good question. They were busy hiding from the problems. Is cyber-bullying likely to be an issue today? Not if parents and teachers hold themselves accountable for creating a civilized environment for students. And this is the biggest difference between then and now: bullying is recognized for what it is, an abuse of power that, were it perpetuated by an adult, would land him in court, perhaps in prison. When an environment is not civilized, that is, when we cannot expect authority to defend our basic interests, "law of the jungle" *will* reign. There *will* be bullying, many victims will be hurt, and from time to time bullies may be grieviously injured themselves. Is it wrong to be proud of your resoucefulness in surviving a lawless situation, in preventing even greater *permanent* harm to yourself? I don't think so.

    12. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Bullies like easy targets. If a kid fights back, even if he gets his ass kicked, the bully will look for an easier mark next time.

      Where this gets a bit sticky is as a parent: how do you teach your kids when to react and when not to? How can you be sure (not being present) when they should and shouldn't respond? Backing your kids unconditionally is also not a good answer -- that's what the bully's parents do, and that's why he is like he is.

      My oldest son (now 10) had a lot of trouble with a bully three years ago, but I had a hard time counseling him to be agressive, because I know my son, and I know that he tends to get upset and angry very easily, and that he frequently overreacts badly. By the time I was convinced that he really needed to fight back, the bullying pattern was so deeply entrenched that fighting back wouldn't really have helped. You need to nip it in the bud.

      In his case, frankly, I misjudged the situation -- I screwed up. Not too hard to do as a parent, especially with your first child. Still, the point is that the parent post's advice is excellent, but easier to talk about than to implement in practice, particularly for first-time parents.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Bovineck · · Score: 1

      Ender? Is that you?

    14. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      At the end of the day, you have a God-given right to defend yourself and your dignity. End of story.

      No, after those books of the Bible was written, there was this guy called Jesus yeah, and one of the things he said was "turn the other cheek". It pays to read to the end.

      However hardly any people who call themselves Christians ever took any notice of that, except maybe the Quakers. I can't say I've taken much account of it myself (and Revelations is just freaky).

      However, I have seen your attitude ("so hit him back then!" from parents) in action with young kids in a waiting room - in a prison (where they are presumably waiting to visit their elder brothers), so I am unconvinced of its efficacy.

    15. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But now the losers have Nu-Metal! Yeah! Fight back with whiny-pseudo-goth music!

    16. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by maddmaster · · Score: 1

      This simply mean i have to teach my children how to program in C, C++ and not to be afraid of linux...

      Forward for the Geek family. It is time that we claim what is righfully ours!!!

      --
      Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
    17. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by asr_man · · Score: 1

      It's safe to say that all of the responders who chafe at hitting back or recommend turning the other cheek haven't experienced the daily adrenaline-soaked panic of multiple other kids physically threatening them. We're not talking about a few "incidents" here that are easily forgotten, we're talking about a posse of bullies making you feel in their gunsights at any moment, for their own entertainment. Compulsory school attendance becomes like chemotherapy: something that is supposed to make you better off eventually but at the moment is killing your insides.

      People who haven't been there can't begin to have an informed opinion about what the victims *should* be doing. Being this emotionally whacked on a daily basis for an extended period leaves an indelible mark, making you unlike the rest of the people around you. Can you say paranoia and withdrawal? And it isn't something that goes away just because you "grow up" or have years of therapy. You can get a handle on it but it's wired into you for life.

      Those "responsible adults" were sooo good at creating an environment where children have opportunities to learn how to solve problems on their own. I learned very quickly not to expect those adults to be of any assistance until after I was trashed. Try to tell them about your bullying problems and you'll find it denied or delegated back into your face. Then once the blood starts running you're presumed as guilty as the other party. Sure kids' sense of justice is too black and white (throw a desk), but the injustice of official ignorance to the bullying is where it starts.

      When violence comes your way unasked for, you're left with two choices. You can feel good about having stood up for yourself, or you can feel like shit for being made to feel like shit and not doing anything about it. While I can't be certain I'd be a happier person today if I'd made Poag's choice more often, I do know what not making that choice often enough did to me, and I definitely don't recommend it. Fight back when you have to, learn how to if you can't.

    18. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      There have been people in my past whose actions toward me would have led me to literally kill them without any remorse whatsoever.

    19. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by mandolin · · Score: 1
      First: congratulations, that worked out very well for you and the bully probably even deserved it. That took balls.

      Even though I got more than my share of taunting, I couldn't recommend your solution to every picked-on person. What if you had accidentally crushed his skull instead of his larynx? As it is, I'm suprised you didn't get sued by the guy's parents. If you went Columbine on his ass today you might not get off so easily.

      Also, some victims are very uncoordinated. I knew one guy who decided he had enough and tried to kick his bully in the balls. He mis-aimed. Whoops.

      In either case, I'd have to either recommend some martial-arts training or boxing, so at least you could control the damage you were dealing out. OTOH you'd probably be held responsible for it, whereas I bet you got off with "I didn't know I could hurt him so bad"

      Finally, as another poster pointed out, there are the kids you want to mess with as little as possible. You know, members of (insert your country)'s Future Violent Criminals Club. They're too stupid to understand that killing you in retaliation isn't worth it.

    20. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [don't mean to be do direct but I find /. a little trying on this subject because the 'holier' attitude is little hypocritical for a crowd so bent on personal integrity.]

      See, now here's the problem. You live in cluelessville, where getting picked on is something that every kid has to put up with. People who complain excessively about bullying are just playing the victim. Fuck that. You have no idea. You couldn't or you wouldn't describe it as you have. There's a whole other world of pain out there, of scars that last deep into adulthood.

      I can hear higher frequencies than most people. If there's some machine screeching away terribly, and I complain about it, people tend to be incredulous. What, am making it up? Why do people have such a hard time empathizing with pain they don't understand?

      Triumphant victims? I can't speak for others, but I just want to prevent more kids from putting up with the daily hell I went through. I haven't been bullied in over ten years but the flash of hatred I feel toward you, the choked back tears and the open-wound pain reveal the forever scars of what, you have apparently no idea. Am I making that up, too? I can only pray you aren't a teacher, a coach, a police officer, or someone else in a position of authority over other kids.

    21. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Turn the other also" was an act of passive defiance. Striking someone on the right cheek was a demeaning, condescending slap with the back of the right hand (the left hand was unclean, so using it would have been shameful). To offer the left cheek is to require them to either back off or strike you with the palm or fist--as an equal.

    22. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      So like remind me what happened to Jesus? Turning the other cheek sure really worked for him?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    23. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Britz · · Score: 1

      So Your child will be a bully instead of a victim? Great choice. That will spare Your kid from the horrors it will bestow upon others during his/her school career.

    24. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1



      My parents felt it was important for me to arrive at my own conclusions, as to how best to deal with different situations. Sure, they would help guide my decision making process, but they would hold off on making the decision for me. They didn't "cheer me on", as you suggested. Hell, if I remember correctly, they werent aware of any bullying at all, up until the incident. My point is, once they found out, and understood what was going on, they were supportive and completely understanding of what I did. At no point in my upbringing was I told that "resorting to violence is wrong", because it isn't wrong. Having to resort to violence as a means to stop something like that is more than justified; it's a logical choice, and one proven to fix the problem. The school wasn't going to do anything about it, and the bully sure as hell wasn't going to do anything about it, so, what choice is there?

      Sure, having your parents put the heat on the school might be a good start, but it'll take weeks or even months for the school to get the message and actually do something about it---and meanwhile, the abuse continues.

      That was the point I was trying to make. If my kid chose to put an end to the abuse he was recieving at school, i'd applaud him, and stand behind him 100%. On the flip side, i'd make sure he understood that resorting to violence, while it is an option, is the last option.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    25. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by smitty45 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to say that punching and spitting back from the beginning is justifiable. Waiting instead to harm the bully in some more violent or dramatic way later is not justifiable, and will only serve to teach kids that 'geeks' or 'losers' are people who:

      1-take a beating for a long time without doing anything about it, then
      2-shoot/maim/destroy the people mentioned in #1

      it's a familiar and stereotypical pattern that most of the US have seen on TV in events such as Columbine High School. I'm not comparing you fighting back against a bully to Columbine, I'm making the point that kids will do better to learn that punching people back when they are first picked on is infinitely better than doing nothing, bottling it up, and somehow 'plotting' a revenge later that usually contains some larger measure of violence.

      (a desk coming down on one's larynx is a lot more violent and dramatic act than a daily punch and spitting on)

      about the school, most people don't mention things to schools because they think that it *will* take weeks or months for something to actually happen. if they'd only try, they'd see that most schools in this country are very interested and motivated to end violence.

    26. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      And yet even He siezed the whip and cleaned out the temple...

      I'll point out, though, that that phrase is taken out of context. Historically, if you smacked an inferior, you did it with the palm (as I recall.) By turning the cheek, they'd have to slap you backhanded, and thereby acknowledge you as an equal.

      Similarly, 'if you are compelled to walk one mile, walk two' was due to regs in the Roman Legions which stated exactly what you could force your slaves to do; by doing more, you could get your owner into trouble.

      Besides, it's alot easier to be passive when you're the Son of God.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    27. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it did work quite well. If one of the things you intend to do is sacrifice your life for others, then Jesus' methods were perfect.

    28. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I was taught by my parents when I was in school. " Don't start anything yourself. and don't stop at anything when provoked." basically my right to defend myself in anyway fit to defent myself but not to become a bully myself. what keeps a bully going is that others are nto responding antagonist ways. i am not advocating violence. but better to let the safety valve open( retalliate) than burst ( fsck yourself)

    29. Re:Your fundemental right to safety and dignity. by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 1

      You live in cluelessville, where getting picked on is something that every kid has to put up with

      That's not cluelessville, it's the real world. Every (and I do mean EVERY) kid WILL get picked on. It's not something you have to put up with, but it will happen. And every... and I do mean EVERY kid will pick on someone else. Don't tell me you never did it, because you did. Didn't you? Remember now? That's right. You did it too, so get off your soapbox.

      There's a whole other world of pain out there, of scars that last deep into adulthood

      I was lit on fire (3rd degree burns), spit on by my 'best friend', stripped in public and beaten too. Some things can be prevented and if I'd told someone I probably wouldn't have had to put up with that (or picked better friends) - I was pushed into a mostly frozen lake while ice-skating and almost drowned. But I'll tell you something.. One of the best memories I have of High School was defending a kid that was getting ruthlessly picked on. It got my ass kicked, but they left him alone, and never picked on anyone around me again. And I found out there were a lot of other kids who wanted to say something too. Some of them were the cool kids that were standing around watching it happen - I thought they were in on it just because they were too afraid to say anything. THAT is a life changing realization. Thus - the disdain for people like you who believe that they were victims and that no one would help them. My offense at people who play the 'triumphant victims' is that most of you never stepped in to defend someone else when it was happening to them, knowing full well it would turn the wrath on you. You were just grateful it wasn't you.

      You can't stop kids from picking on other kids. You can teach them right from wrong, and you can teach them to stick up for the other guy, but you can't stop it. Your problem as a 'triumphant victim' is that you survived it, but you offer no suggestions as to how to stop it from happening to others. I believe you can curb the prevalence of it all by teaching kids to have courage.

      In short - you can't stop it from happening to you, but you can stop it from happening to the other guy. And that's what's most important.

  122. More to that, as I was once a victim by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was once bullied too via a website, and that person decided to put that site on Angelfire. I complained to Angelfire via their webform, but they didn't reply quick enough (was not looked into for two days), and so I sent them this email...

    The homepage at "http://angelfire.lycos.com/xxx/xxxxxxxx" has violated the parts of the Terms And Conditions of Lycos Network (URL: "http://www.lycos.com/lycosinc/legal.html").

    Violation includes (but not limited to):
    6. Members Conduct - Prohibited Conduct:
    c. Upload, post, email, otherwise transmit or post links to any
    Content that exploits the images of children under 18 years
    of age, or that discloses personally identifying information
    belonging to children under 18 years of age.
    h. Impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited
    to, a Lycos Network official, employee, forum leader, guide or
    host, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your
    affiliation with a person or entity.

    This homepage impersonated me and exposed information about me (under 18) and IT must be REMOVED IMMEDIATELY, or LEGAL ACTIONS may be taken for not reinforcing the Terms and Condition. When the homepage is removed, please notify this e-mail address at "xxxxxxxxxxxx@hotmail.com"

    I was about 16 then, trying in vain to sound like a lawyer. Anyway those kids posted pictures a blurred out scanned picture of me from the yearbook, and posted some false information about me, and went to an online game I played and spread the link.. slight damage was done, but whatever, after I sent that email the site was gone within 24 hours, and they replied saying that had been taken care of.

    Then again, if those kids knew how to set up a personal server.... DDoS time.
    --
    Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
  123. In 20 years by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    It will be the geeks that steriotypically pick on the Jocks Mwahahaha

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:In 20 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new coke bottle glasses, pocket protector wearing overlords.

  124. Misuse of term terrorist by Jesrad · · Score: 1

    I remember back in the 80s, "terrorist" meant "someone who hijacks a plane with guns and bomb threats" or "someone who straps explosives on and blows self up in a crowd" or "sets up a (toxic gas) bomb in a crowded place". It roughly equated to "criminal mad with anger or self-righteousness" to me.

    terrorize, v
    1: coerce by violence or with threats
    2: fill with terror; frighten greatly [syn: terrify]


    Somehow I doubt threatening to tell everyone your shirt looks dorky qualifies. Pray you never learn what terror really feels like.

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?
    1. Re:Misuse of term terrorist by kabocox · · Score: 1

      You were obviously not terriorized in school. Emtional terror can be more over whelming than anything. I was terrified by your definiton of certain groups during Junior High. If you go strictly by what the law says, any bully is breaking several laws. Just let them beat you up, they you can file assualt charges on them. Yeah, I know it doesn't sound right for kids in playgrounds to file assault charges on bullies, but why not? Is there a difference?

      I'd say there isn't. Of course by your definition of terriorize and my standards, door to door witnessing would be outlawed. I don't know about you, but death and afterlife greatly fill me with fear. I'd say some one going around and bringing these issues up unasked is terriorizing the public. I wonder if there are any books written from that angle.

  125. Re:Oh man...slightly off topic by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    Anyone else have some regrets about going to college? Maybe the bullies and dropouts outsmarted the rest of us. My teachers always told us that college is practically the sole path to success. I bought into it for better or worse.

    I am a college student in Florida. I feel both optimistic and pessimistic simulataneously. I am studying Electrical Engineering, and hope to make 45-50k upon graduation. Good money, no doubt about it. But had I spent the last 3 years getting experience in real estate, I could be making 45 by now, and who knows what in the next few years! Meaning I have to make up 60k in lost potetial to make sure my engineering career is "worth it". Not to mention the stress engineering students have to go through (25 hours a week of studying, about 80 a week when lots of tests come). Plus, I don't get the satisfaction of working for myself or the benefits of private practice (such as tax writeoffs)

    Unfortunately, I will never be rich if my sole source of income is as an EE. Unfortunately, if I decide to get into a more entrepreneurial occupation after graduation (which is what my parents want me to do) I have lost 4 years of my life. All that is not including the debt I'll rack up while getting this degree!

    Moreover after graduation, I will likely be salaried meaning you get no overtime and whats more, less time to pursue money making ventures (fixing up houses, becoming a landlord, starting a side business etc)

    Fortunately, I am still young. Fortunately, I live in a country of opportunity where I can still build wealth and use my degree as a jump start. Fortunately, I have more of a guarantee making a good salary in an ee occupation than going it alone.

    Who would think that being optimistic and pessimistic at the same time was even possible!

    --Joey

  126. It's S-P-E-E-C-H, you asshat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get it?

  127. Give'm the Slashdot Effect by ajax0187 · · Score: 1

    Heck, if the kid wants to get rid of the website, they should put a link to it on /. I'd give the servers ten minutes.

    --
    "By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth." - George Carlin
    1. Re:Give'm the Slashdot Effect by FCKGW · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even easier if it's a Geocities page or something similar with a low transfer limit: just write a little script calling wget to download each file, then have cron (or scheduled tasks on Windows) call that script every minute.

      What sweet irony it would be to have a site making fun of me for being a geek, then using abilities gained from being a geek to kill it. Nobody successfully attacks us geeks on our home turf. ;-)

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
  128. Nothing to ponder by bonch · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it violate my speech rights if they do even if it is slander?

    No, you don't have "speech rights" on somebody's messageboard.

  129. Let 'em come by Mastedon · · Score: 1

    Let the bullies step on up cyber-style.

    I couldn't get away from them during gym class....but now they are fighting on my turf!

    And I know my network kung-fu is better than theirs. Bring the noise.

    But seriously, kids just gotta deal. Bullied on the net, bullied in class, it doesn't matter. There will always be bullies; and it is a right of passage for us nerdy types.

  130. Teach your kid self defense by djeaux · · Score: 1
    When I was a kid, dads were all the time teaching kids how to defend themselves on the playground. "Knee 'em in the crotch & when the double over give 'em an uppercut in the nose," was my mantra.

    Now, I guess we should teach our kids how to run tracerts, do ping attacks on the bully's IP, or sneak a little trojan into the ole IM...

    Kid: "Hey, dad, Billy called me a faggot."
    Dad: "What did you do?"
    Kid: "I deleted Billy's term paper from his hard drive."
    Dad: "That's my kid!" (proudly)

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  131. Implement school policies that make sense by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    For example, how about getting rid of this BS that a student can have a cell phone in the school. I'm sorry, there is no reason for a student in high school or younger to have a cell phone with them during class or lunch (it is fine if the kid has it out in their car, but inside the building...no reason for it). This would eliminate kids taking pictures of each other in compromising times like when using the bathroom. (To someone who might say, "Well the kid will hide it"...trust me, kids don't hide things as well as they think. Most of them would probably forgetfully bust it out in places where it could be viewed by a teacher or administrator)

    The second biggest problem that needs to be remedied is to teach them to respect adults! So many people fail to realize that many students today (especially in high school) refuse to respect their teachers at all unless the principal is around. If we can get these students to realize that they need to grow up and make something of themselves (something that doesn't involve acting like a damn reject of society), that may help the situation.

  132. revenge burns in the mind like a big gaping hole by spoonyfork · · Score: 1
    It's funny that you would have goatse.cx in your sig with your post. It reminds me of something that I did last year.

    The bullies in my school happened to be the jock/prep/student government clique. They put together a 10 year reunion website to organize and collect contact info. Unfortunately the guy who put it up had no clue how to run a site. After snagging all of the contact info for spam fodder I simply redirected pages to a google cache article of a news story on the girl who drugged a teacher our senior year.

    After they "fixed" that and chastised the "hacker" for being childish (which I fully admit I was) I then had all traffic redirected to goatse.cx. Yum. Let that imagine burn in your mind forever, chums.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  133. I Am a Cyber bully by loknor · · Score: 1

    You all suck nener nener nener! :p
    I even made a webpage to show my how much you suck!
    Your Gay!

    --

    me karma am bad
    1. Re:I Am a Cyber bully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His gay? That makes no sense.

  134. Re:Typical love-fest article: no punishment discus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "We could actually deter bullies if real punishments (long suspensions resulting in class failure, expulsions, small claims judgements for out-of-school offenses) were doled out for serious offenses."

    Incarceration in a juvenile correctional facility for assault and battery charges comes to my mind before any of your ideas do.

  135. Nice by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
    (+2, Dumbo)

    Seriously, good point. You're spot-on.

  136. Criminal charges by maynard · · Score: 1, Informative
    I kicked the WIPO Troll off my site and got his account pulled because he posted hardcore gay porn pics to my board using an IE exploit.

    The crapflooders ruined that, up to and including running exploits against the board software itself. The security issues got to be so much for the good people at Hosting Matters that we mutually decided it wasn't worth it.

    You have an opportunity to file a criminal complaint against those who exploited the security of your system in order to wrongfully damage your property or service. This was very likely a federal felony and deserves an investigation with both local police and the FBI. In addition you also have grounds for a civil suit; should you gain a criminal conviction winning a civil suit is almost assured. I hope you saved your logs.

    Want to teach those assholes a lesson? Let them explain their behavior to the police, district attorney, and finally - a judge.

    Best,
    --Maynard
    1. Re:Criminal charges by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      Unless he's got a high dollar loss or some friends in law enforcement, no one's going to be explaining anything to a cop or a judge, unfortunately. Those laws are for enforcement on behalf of those with coin.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    2. Re:Criminal charges by maynard · · Score: 1

      Unless he's got a high dollar loss or some friends in law enforcement, no one's going to be explaining anything to a cop or a judge, unfortunately. Those laws are for enforcement on behalf of those with coin.

      I don't think this is the case. Speaking as someone who has actually seen through an assault prosecution at one time, and sat on a jury another, I do believe the local police will help if you give them sufficient evidence. Can't speak for federal law enforcement though, never encountered those guys. I have mixed feelings about the police though. I have in the past donated to the FOP and do consider the police an important part of my community. But I also disagree with our drug laws (though don't blame the cops for following orders to enforce), and feel that cops all too often protect their own bad apples at the expense of society. Tax dollar for dollar I do feel the fire department gives better service to the community on average.

      OK enough ranting. I do think the top level poster ought to consider contacting the police if she has sufficient evidence to pursue those criminals. But that's JMO.

      Cheers,
      --Maynard

    3. Re:Criminal charges by acceleriter · · Score: 1
      Assualt is a different kettle of fish. Everyone understands assault. Only a relatively small group of LEOs get "cybercrime," and they're busy helping large corporations and high profile individuals. Even for such mundane crimes as credit card fraud, there's a five figure threshold before the Secret Service will even bother pursuing a case related to a mere individual.

      No harm in asking for prosecution, I suppose--so long as the victim is squeaky clean himself in every way (i.e. no questionable software licensing practices, no MP3s), etc. No point in being the low hanging fruit.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  137. That reminds me by Kernull · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of a time in High School, I'll spare the story but in short, in involved a dynamicly created page using the subdomain, example:
    http://you.isgay.com/
    Where 'you' could be anything like
    http://john.doe.isgay.com/
    Very amusing to the techno-savvy. Eventually the creator got so many emails he made it more obvious it was a trick.

  138. RTFM eh? Now I can sue you, meanies by chewmanfoo · · Score: 1

    I KNEW there was a legal case here! FInally I can get you linux guru's to answer my questions promptly and politely in IRC without getting snubbed and ignored.

  139. Try Dr. Kevorkian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear he has a great solution for folks like you.

  140. Cyber-bullying can easily be avoided by NomadRaven · · Score: 1

    It's a lot easier to change your E-mail address or turn off your instant messenger programs than it is to hide on the playground. Sure, bullying is a big problem, but I don't think cyber-bullying is as big of a deal as the media wants to make it seem.

  141. crap posts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >But I have gotten emails from women who don't >read Slashdot because the crap posts are so >disturbing to them.

    You mean Goatse?

    yeah, were all scarred but I read a good deal at work and Ive never noticed anything particularly offensive to women. there is a lot of childish humour but its not like the words tw*t,c*unt are a mainstay here.

    Im sure we all have our different levels of 'offensive', every group does but /. doesnt strike me any different than HBO...

    But then again there are those that get offended at the word penis, so many its good to have a Cybersitter for those people or at least someone to sit with them while theyre surfing the net.

    zeke

  142. Remember the post-Columbine days? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Student thought process: Hmm. Some loser kids in Colorado got picked on a lot, then went out and gunned down their school. We have loser kids in this very school who remind me of them.

    Conclusion: Let's go pick on them. Purely as a self-defense measure, of course.

    Weird, sad times.

    Now that bullying has gone high tech, we have to adapt with the times. Here's the formula, kids.

    Step 1: Write a web page, explaining what a complete loser you are. Mock your shoes, your clothes, your haircut, your complexion, your hygiene, and question your own sexual orientation.

    Step 2: Point yourself out as a potential threat to other students, explaining how you need to be beaten down in the name of patriotism and non-loserhood.

    Step 3: Sign the page $BULLY_NAME.

    Step 4: Throw in spelling/punctuation/grammatical errors.

    Step 5: Hack $BULLY_NAME's site, and upload. Send yourself a profanity-laced e-mail with a URL.

    Step 6: Forward message to principal and teacher.

  143. Ah, the old American self-defense theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Beat the bullies senseless two or three times, and guess what, they leave you alone.

    Did you succeed? Are you alone now?

  144. It's NEW and DANGEROUS because it's the INTERNET! by carlfish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Come on. I read through the whole article and didn't see a single thing that didn't happen when I went to school, pre-Internet. Or, for that matter, I didn't read anything that I didn't hear from my parents' stories about when they went to school.

    The article spent four fifths of its copy trying to make out that teasing and gossip-spreading were something novel and Internet-age. Yeah, sure. Before text-messages, kids just had no way of insulting or passing information to each other. Certainly, no schoolgirl has ever been teased about her clothes, or boy about his sexuality, before the age of the Dark, Nasty Internet.

    Children are vicious. They learn the need to establish a social hierarchy long before they learn empathy. Paul Graham covers this phenomenon quite effectively in one of his essays.

    Sure, the "instant-on" thing is new, but really, kids will do exactly what adults do when they want to get away from unwanted IMs: go invisible, or register a second screen-name that only their friends know.

    I'm not saying it's not a problem, but it's not a new problem. I abhor lazy journalism that finds sensationalism in dressing up something as old as time (pornography, bullying, copying music) in Internet clothes, just because it's easier to scare people that way.

    Charles Miller

    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
  145. My sister by phorm · · Score: 1

    Had problems of this sort. Apparently some guy from school whom she shot down devoted a section of his blog to badmouthing her. I don't know what happened in the end, if she got him to take down the ugly blog site or if it just faded into antiquity.

    Alternative to that, I've always been amusing by sending simpleminded people http://firstname.lastname.isgay.com, which prints out amusing articles about the person in the URL header.

  146. Self Confidence by shoemakc · · Score: 1


    The main issue is self-confidence. Most kids and many younger adults just don't have the self-confidence to stand up for themselves; be it physical or verbal, our even by complete indifference. You also have to understand that many of these bullies are dangling from the finest thread of self-confidence imaginable. All it takes sometimes is one line in the sand to shatter that confidence and gain your peace.

    I recall my stands, and I was generaly left alone after that.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  147. Excellent!!!! by insertionPoint · · Score: 1

    I would like to say that this will be the best thing ever to happen to geeks. Why? Well, when I was a kid bullys beat me up and stuff. God help the bully who would have tried to go techy on my ass!!! My children will grow up in a world where bullys get their websites DDOSed etc...
    I can see it now (Bully site)"TImmy is gay"
    E-Mail to Bully site I admin from Timmy "I own your website and I got your moms credit card. If you do not leave me alone I will buy lots of gay porn under your name with her card. Also, look at your site. Do you like that picture I think it does you justice and Elton John never looked so young...I really like the Gimp it works well. Would you like to call truce?

  148. I was a bully in school, so here's what you do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was one of those kids that tormented kids psychologically. I don't know what it was, but I would just smell weakness and pounce on it. I wasn't a jock or one of the cool kids, I was one of the smart kids but viciously cruel.

    I wasn't really picked on very much, but I could hold my own against the jocks when it came to making fun of someone. It was a tense relationship, kind of like what you would see in the African safari when lions are amongst the gazelle but everyone was on guard.

    I would go out of my way to make some kids feel really stupid. "You're so ugly. Why do you even bother? You should kill yourself." I could single out the weakest of the weak and just pound and pound on them verbally.

    I even drove one girl out of my school because I kept on harrassing her about how ugly she was.

    Of course, I'm not proud of what I did when I was a kid.

    But if you want to learn something from the bully's perspective here's what I'm going to do to protect my kid from bullies:

    1) Have your kids socialize and make friends. This is the biggest thing that protects them from bullies. Raising a loner kid will compound the problem because it makes them an easy target. Make sure these friends are the good kinds that will watch each other's back, not the bad kinds. My 3 closest friends I've known since age 5 and we have been best friends for the past 30 years.

    2) They are going to learn karate from the age of 4. First of all, it gives the kid self-confidence. Bullies can smell weakness a mile away and even I can't explain why I want to crush weakness, but I do. If you have self-confidence, they know to not mess around. Plus, being able to kick ass comes in handy. If my kid were ever harrassed to an extreme, I would gladly give them the okay to go kick their bully's ass. No if-ands-or-buts. A good ass-kicking will generally shut-up most kids. Doing this at an early age will not be taken as seriously, and if they can establish a reputation for being someone not to fuck around with, then it will last throughout high school.

    3) If they get harrassed, teach them how to harrass back. Fight fire with fire. A victim that will fight back is a less desirable victim that one who will just do nothing and take it. Bullies will always go for the easiest target, just like in the animal kingdom. Why go for the bigger, stronger prey when you can go for the weakest. Making sure your kid isn't the weakest will go a long way to ensuring a less-traumatic high school experience.

    To all you losers that say, "Ignore them and the problem will go away", this is 100% absolutely wrong. Like I said, you have to make sure your kid doesn't reek weakness. I loved picking on kids that didn't say anything or didn't fight back. "What, are you so dumb you can't even say anything? What a retard! Why don't you just kill yourself if you're so stupid you can even speak." It's so easy and so gratifying for a bully to attack some loser that doesn't fight back.

    You must MUST fight back, either intellectually or physically. Remember, it's exactly like the animal kingdom and it's just kids trying to establish who is the alpha male or female.

  149. She might be full of it... by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
    ... but my mom tells me that back in her day, when the girls knew a really big fight was coming, they'd braid razor blades into their hair to keep it from getting pulled.

    From my own high school experience, chick fights were nasty. Men went into fights in high school looking to knock the other guy down in front of his friends more than anything else-- fighting wasn't rampant, but it was far from unheard of. People got bloody, maybe a broken nose here or there, but overall no debilitating injuries. By the time a couple girls got pissed enough to fight, though, they were going for the jugular. Seriously, it's scary.

    1. Re:She might be full of it... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      See my post above comparing how the social order works among male vs female dogs -- exactly as you describe. Males knock each other around, but females fight to kill.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  150. Re:Bullies should be killed. With a knife in the e by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

    This should be modded better than that.

  151. Im a Cyber bully! by matlantis · · Score: 1

    Wow im a cyber bully and didn't even know it, Ive been posting a web blog with my coworker Camerons shortcomings for the last month. cammsav.blogspot.com I even have t-shirts available thanks to cafepress.com

    1. Re:Im a Cyber bully! by matlantis · · Score: 1

      OHH! so you want a working link huh? Here it is

  152. Applies equally cross-gender by phorm · · Score: 1

    Trust me, I took hits from both ends of the spectrum. The only thing worse than being the guy harrassed by other guys is when you're also demeaned by the females. Of course, things suddenly improved near the end of high school... sometimes all it takes is a change in environment. I don't know exactly what brought upon the change, except for remarks such as "you know, you're almost cool when you're really drunk," indicated I must have done something pretty out-of-character. A little self-confidence now and I'm capable of dealing with either gender, though sometimes still a little internally squeemish when around the jock-types.

  153. in my days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, I remember the good old days when all that happened was the bullies pushing you down slopes, beating you up, humiliating you or tripped you in the cafeteria.

  154. Re:Oh man...slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a BS in Computer Engineering from Univ of Florida. No regrets here, especially since I like my job (software developer). Though, good luck getting a job after graduation. The market is tough even for an EE. Try to get some work experience before you graduate (internship or co-op, etc). Also, try to do something really badass for your senior project. It'll look really good on your resume and during interviews. I know an EE who got hired with a great offer because his senior project really kicked ass.

    Anyways, I'm really glad I got a degree. Though that's probably because I wouldn't have any other career options other than computers. I know a lot of people without degrees who have a lot of experience in the computer field, but they get denied every time because of the lack of college degree.

    Anyways, despite the tech industry hurting, and all the offshoring (even EE's), having an EE or CEN, or CEE degree (or any engineering degree) is pretty kickass. It's the people with English degrees and other liberal arts degrees that I feel bad for. Every one of my friends who went that route are suffering right now, they are all stuck in their careers. Though the few that went on to grad school are probably going to do alright, but they're just now finishing it (while I've been working for 2-3 years).

  155. Re:Oh man...slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money is all about barriers to entry. Literally anyone can be a real-estate agent, which means competition will include the trophy-wife who doesn't need to make a dime, might even be doing it for a hobby and losing money at it. Unless you have something that trumps 99% of the other agents, you won't make much money in that market.

    EE has a pretty high barrier to entry, thus the relatively high starting salaries. Work it for a couple of years, clear out all debts, put a chunk in the bank for fallback, get good at what you do and then start looking for opportunities. I guarantee you that the ratio of EE millionaires to all EEs is orders of magnitude higher than the ratio of real estate agent millionaires to all real estate agents.

    Plus, you might benefit from reading the book, "the millionaire next door."

  156. Grown-up bullies by mattOzan · · Score: 1

    When these boys grow up, they'll probably turn into these guys who blackmail companies into paying "protection money" to avoid getting DOSed. The advent of digital communication has made all kinds of behaviors more anonymous, including these two. Now you don't even have to confront your victim personally. If the addage that "bullies are the real cowards" is true, then they now have the opportunity to be even more cowardly still.

  157. That's worth modding up by imaginate · · Score: 1

    People are so scared of the geeks because of stupid sh!t like columbine (perpetrated by kids who weren't even very intelligent) that this is exactly what will happen, with the nerd getting slammed by anti-terrorism laws...

  158. Lao Tsu, et al. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old easterners had a lot to say about that.
    ----------
    Powerful men are well advised not to use violence,
    For violence has a habit of returning;
    Thorns and weeds grow wherever an army goes,
    And lean years follow a great war.

    A general is well advised
    To achieve nothing more than his orders:
    Not to take advantage of his victory.
    Nor to glory, boast or pride himself;
    To do what is dictated by necessity,
    Not by choice.

    For even the strongest force will weaken with time,
    And then its violence will return, and kill it.
    ---------

    I like that they don't say "violence is always bad," just that it's better to do only what's necessary. More to the point in your second paragraph:

    ----------
    There is nothing more yielding than water,
    yet when acting on the solid and strong,
    its gentleness and fluidity
    have no equal in any thing.

    The weak can overcome the strong,
    and the supple overcome the hard.
    Although this is known far and wide,
    few put it into practice in their lives.

    Although seemingly paradoxical,
    the person who takes upon himself,
    the people's humiliation,
    is fit to rule;
    and he is fit to lead,
    who takes the country's disasters upon himself.
    --------

    There are lots of others.

  159. Where is JonKatz when you need him? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    Looking at the submission (disclaimer, I didn't RTFA), you'd think this was prime JonKatz material! I could see a Hellmouth-ism coming from this one.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  160. Schoolkids, rumors, pictures? by sharkey · · Score: 1

    You mean this isn't about the DMCA?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  161. Getting schools involved... by Final+Sacrifice · · Score: 0

    Teach me my 6 subjects, and stay the fuck out of my life. What I or any other students do outside of school is none of their business. How should bullying, partying, or any other activites outside of school be their concern? Unless you do something IN THE BUILDING, I don't see how the school should be involved. But that's how the man holds you down, I guess...

  162. This is new? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

    I once made a web site devoted to making fun of my hated junior high school nemesis. This was like 8 years ago. Is cyber bullying finally catching up to my middle school shenannigans?

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  163. it's natural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stonger will always bully the weaker. People who are physically stronger and people who have a big mouth will always be the boss over those who don't. Age does not matter. Teach your children to be strong, not just smart and nice. 'Weak guys' overall have less self esteem and less power in social life, and they get less girls ;)

    I was bullied too, for years, when I was younger, because I was short and smart and not very cool. I was not a computer nerd yet btw, I was just a general nerd (no money for computers). I took martial arts classes, later I started lifted weights and I also started swimming. I was getting good at playing the guitar, which also made me more cool :) It really helped. I really gave me a confidence boost too. When you look and feel strong and healthy, people will see you as strong and healthy. You can even bully them! :)

    It's a fact of life. Like survival of the fittest. So teach your children to be strong!

  164. Clearly.. by FsG · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You were never a victim of the really serious bullying/picking-on - I'm not even talking about the one idiot who won't leave you alone but, say, a group of 5 idiots who do everything possible to humiliate you every day, for several years. You have no idea what that can do to a person, and I can't believe you would have the gall to blame the victim.

    From the perspective of a victim, your comment is the equivalent of blaming the woman for getting raped. Yes, it's that bad.

    --
    I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  165. Learning to fight by phorm · · Score: 1

    Learning self-defence Vs offence is not a bad trait. Yes, you don't want your kids to become the next GB and invade some foreign country, but neither would you want them to sit around and let themselves be abused of their lives (be the ones invaded). The fact of life is, there are people of all ages who will try to abuse you. Some on an emotional level, some physical, some on a profession, and some on all. You have to teach your kids to defend themselves on all levels.

    Mediation doesn't always work, and some people just don't learn... it's really that they're too simple to understand anything but fists, which is why they learn quick when they get their own asses kicked.

    Teach your kids that violence isn't a good way of dealing with things, teach them to try alternatives, but for godsake also teach them that if nothing else works, they have a right to defend themselves, and physically if possible and/or probable.

    It's not about teaching your kids that violence is the best route, it's about teaching them what is appropriate when, and not letting them be punching bags.

    Oh, and for the record, as a former punching-bag in high-school, I don't advocate violence by default, but grinding an aggressor's head into the snow and putting a few others in headlocks did give me a lot of space from physical abuse afterwards (you can do a lot to show your strength without actually hitting somebody).

  166. Cyber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article we can read about "cyber"-bullying. Reading the most prominent sidebar we can also read "For children: Do not respond to cyber-bullying messages.".

    Perhaps someone would care to enlighten me here? What the hell is a "cyber-bullying messages"?

    It might be that I'm just a complete moron and completely uninformed, but do these people even know what "cyber" is? I'd say they don't and just use it as a "cool word" to get attention.

    I'd want a law that prohibits morons to speak before they've gotten killed to spare the world from their stupidity. I'd guess that makes sense in the same way...

  167. The Geeks shall inherit the earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Ranier Wolfcastle voice)
    And the geeks shall inherit the earth

  168. Wait by MorePower · · Score: 1

    Ok, explain to me how you can just receive physical pain from a bully without any pstchological pain. The whole point of them hurting you is psychological. They are demonstraiting that you are so weak and pathetic that you don't even control your own body. That's why bullies particulary enjoy things like grabbing your arm and forcing you to punch your own face while saying "quit hitting yourself", or pinning your arms to the ground under thier legs and using one finger to poke you in the chest repeatedly. It's ALL psychological, the physical aspects are just to prove their assertions of your inferiority in a way that you can't deny or ignore.

  169. Cameras on cell phones by robi2106 · · Score: 1

    Cameras on cell phones can be used while hidden in locker rooms to take ultimately emberassing and highly illegal images.

    I am sure some creeps have thought of this tactic before. I remember our locker room in Jr high was a big room with lockers on the outside. The shower room was seperate and about 10 to 50 feet walk depending on where your locker was. Plenty of space for somone to snap pictures with a cell phone and get in real trouble.

    jason

  170. Sigh by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies

    Nothing makes kids (or adults) behave better like more rules : /

  171. I think they're ragheads or something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    given his last name.

  172. One of these things is not like the other by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 1

    Let's face it, guys, cyberbullying happens here all the time...a few twits calling each other queer, indulging in the cyber equivalent of towel-snapping in the locker room, modding people down as "flamebait," "troll," and "overrated" just because you don't agree with them or they rub you the wrong way...

    Porn & obscene insults are bullying. Being modded down (to +1 or +2) is not - it's not even unfair. If you read at +3, you will never see any of the former. You will, however, see plenty of worthless posts. You know, the posts that you modded up just because you agreed with them, or they rubbed you the right way, regardless of how poorly they expressed their thoughts. People who mod overrated posts as "overrated" are doing valuable work, as valuable as other mods.

    There are plenty of posts that are completely unobjectionable yet are fairly rated at +1: by definition, the vast majority.

    --

    "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
  173. Cyber Bullying by iluvtrolls · · Score: 1

    Oh Great, cyber bullying? I can picture that little Billy is being harrassed:

    U R teh ghey. U suXX0rz 4t Quake.

    If this is the kind of crap going on they deserve it. Turn off the computer already!!!

  174. 4) Nerd stabs bully in the thigh with steak knife by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Seriously...the way to deal with a bully is to give back with more force than you received. If you are unable to match the bully with your bare hands, use tools. We aren't monkeys.

    --
    Blar.
  175. Death threats go a bit beyond bullying by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
    Did anyone actually read the article about the girl who found out there was a whole website up to torment her? It included a day for her death. That amounts to a death threat, just saying you want to kill someone isn't likely to be considered such, but when you start listing a DATE you've obviously got more in mind that just mouthing off.

    I'm really surprised no one commented on this (at least that I could find, maybe they got modded down). This is definitely an example that is well beyond bullying. We'll never know for sure, but if the girl hadn't inadvertantly found out about the site, and the school officials (and others) alerted, she might be dead by now.

    The article is slim on details, but I would hope some charges were filed against the site's creator. Before anyone starts yelling about they're just kids, we're talking 15yos here, and they certainly know that death is permanent. They should be held accountable.

  176. responce from original poster by Brigadier · · Score: 1


    with all due respect, the childrens mom worked in social services for many years dealing with abused children. my friend if you had any idea the lenths a pedifile will go to, to talk to and get to know your minor yo uwould be surprised. Me well i've been using the net since the days or prodigy bulliten boards. I know the trash that is out there. In this case I am not being nieve i'm being knowledgable. If I wont allow my children to tal to strangers on the street how is the internet any differnt.

    1. Re:responce from original poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wont allow my children to tal to strangers on the street how is the internet any differnt.

      Are you serious? Ok, in case you are, here's two big ones:

      1) The off-switch.
      2) No sticks and stones on the net.

      Sounds like your wife has made the decision on this one. Unfortunately, she only has a very biased background to base her decision on. It is a standard human failure when doing risk assesment, if you hear about it or see it every day, or the crime is very heinous then your gut will tell you that it is important to avoid anything that might let the crime happen again, at all costs. This is the same reaction that makes parents afraid to let their kids play outside because they see stories of kidnapping and kid-murders every night on the news, despite the fact that rates of violence against children are at a 30 year low. This is the same sentiment that politicians rely on when they do the, "if this new baloney law saves the life of just one child, it will all be worth it."

      So, in one sense you are easing your wife's fears, making her life easier. But in another sense, you are both stunting your children's potential for growth in exchange for that peace of mind. I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I did the same to my kids. But, I think that kids are supposed to play in the dirt, get bloody knees, catch colds, get stung by bees, fall out of trees, etc because those things prepare them for adult life 1000x better than just getting a lecture or reading a book about it does.

  177. Michelle Klein-Hass naked and petrified!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are you thinking what I'm thinking? I'm thinking: me, you, and a scientifically-proven magic petrification ray, you hot little bitch!

  178. Ah, the old European self-defense theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know you're not alone... you're occupied. Call it success if you will.

  179. Teach your kid empathy by Ricin · · Score: 1

    In support of OP and because time just took my last two modpoints, he's spot on.

    If you're going to teach your kid one thing, teach them empathy.

    OP made a few excellent points, give him some mod.

  180. You obviously were not bullied by good bullies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really good bullies will not just make fun of you. They will alienate you. They won't just stop at one comment. They will harrass you constantly. You can ignore them all you want, but all the relentless, unwanted attention will drive your friends away from you because they don't want to get bullied as well.

    Imagine day-after-day of being made fun of over and over again. Every single action is constantly scrutinized for any single mistake and blown out of proportion. Imagine not having too many friends because they don't want to get bullied along with you. After a while, it gets really lonely. It will psychologically affect you, especially when you are a kid.

    I was a bully in elementary school, and I know... breaking people was one of my specialties and my favorite things. It's not something I'm proud of now, but I would find something to get under your skin, and I wouldn't stop until I got you.

    Of course, do that when you're 25 years old, and you look silly. But when you're a pre-teen or teenager, you don't have the level of maturity or self-confidence to know what to do, especially if you get more and more alienated from the rest of your classmates.

    It's not so easy to just ignore bullies.

  181. I didn't think football players were smart enough by blueberry(4*atan(1)) · · Score: 1

    to send an email.

  182. Yes more policies by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    chief among them being the establishment of specific school policies

    to do what? say its against the rules to bully? is txt message bullying somehow not covered under the policy "be nice to people", sounds like the ranting of a lazy management "erm yes lets have a meeting and create some more policies"

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  183. Frighteningly close to home... by Amaris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a very similar experience all throughout school -- unfortunately, the only thing worse than being the person everyone loves to pick on is being the extremely shy person everyone loves to pick on, so I was never able to stand up for myself the way many other people posting in this thread have. I agree that kids need to be taught how to defend themselves, but at the same time I think parents need to teach them that the things they say can have very real and lasting effects on people. I really envy the people who have found some sort of closure for all the anger that builds up after years of bullying, and I think it's tragic that so many people are graduating high school feeling like they've just escaped from a POW camp. Bullying is something that urgently needs more attention, because I don't remember any of the "zero tolerance" policies being enforced to any sort of degree while I was in school. My 2c, please excuse the rant :) -- Amaris

  184. The above post shows what is wrong by blueberry(4*atan(1)) · · Score: 5, Insightful
    with the whole f'ed up situation. While trying to be funny, the poster puts down the parent poster for being/acting/speaking "too smart."

    This gets lots of laughs, and gives liqudsin the attention he craves. The net effect is to discourage outward signs of intelligence by belittling the "nerds." Ha Ha Ha. You sure are cool.

    God forbid anybody is smart in this dumbed-down society.

    Pathetic.

    1. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by ifwm · · Score: 1

      Shut up nerd

      shakes fist

    2. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't sound 'too smart' he sounded 'too gay.' hence my laughter. No one talks like that dude. Please. You can't be that smart if you don't know how normal people talk to each other. And you saying that liquidsin was 'displaying outward signs of intelligence' because he strung a couple of big words together makes me laugh at you too.

    3. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frat boys are very often closet homosexuals.

    4. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by tralfamador · · Score: 1

      ok, do something for me.

      reach both hands behind your back.
      you doing that? good.
      now please try to pull that tremendous stick out of your ass.

    5. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by FsG · · Score: 1

      Right on! I've never seen a more insightful comment in my life! And to reply to what someone else said about parent, I don't fsckin' care if that's how "normal" people talk or not. What ever happened to the normal peoples' favorite piece of advice? Of course, I'm referring to "be yourself."

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
    6. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smart? You have to be joking right? It's called over-analyzing the situation. 'Linear heirarchy of individuals'?? Come on - who could express such a simple idea in a more awkward fashion? When I was in school, the smart and clever people didn't get bullied - it was those who just thought they were.

    7. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      While trying to be funny, the poster puts down the parent poster for being/acting/speaking "too smart."


      You called that smart? I call it trying to pretend to be smart. Maybe they bullied him cause he thought he was an arrogant prick who liked to wank off while thinking how much smarter he was than the guys getting laid every week.

    8. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I resent the implication that all heterosexuals are as poorly educated as you.

    9. Re:The above post shows what is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing your other flaming replies, you sure struck home.

  185. this skims it by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    cyber bullying also happens in online communities, where people will join communities, and use various forms on pressure to get the weak minded to do whatever they want, or people who pointlessly troll and spam others, to a psychotic degree (emails, website attacks, hacking, character deflamation.. etc) luckily they cant hurt you physically. and you can change names online and go elsewhere, in reality, you cant, well you can, but it's not as easy, and that's only after bullying gets to the point of stalking and death threats.. when it becomes a pure obsession on the bully's part. that's when you set up a sting on the bastard.

    I was once harassed online and offline by someone, he didnt directly atack me, but he had his friends pass messages to me, and online, he'd go to chatrooms and spam...
    well, I eventually found the bastard, was some little nerdy (as in, a loser without a life, and not that intelligent, but wants to be) final fantasy fanboy, he tried to run, tripped, then I beat his ass up.

    my problems went away quickly.
    I have a high temper threshold, but if someone manages to break it, say a bully, I cant garauntee their safety, since when I do his my threshold, I just snap.

    other than that, yeah, I could go on about all the things they missed in that report, since cyber bullying goes farther than that, hell, bullying in general goes farther than that, a lot of true cyber bullies (Ones that plague communities) were probably brought up in a shitty situation, then got the shit beaten out of them at school, so they take it online..
    they're usually the losers, most peopel online arent bothered by them, some are, especially when they get obsessive.. I've seen it, and have seen it firsthand. hell, one asshole actually wants me dead, and his followers have vowed to kill me in his name, you know.. shit like that.. that's how sad the internet gets, folks.
    doubt any of them can leave their chairs anyways.

  186. What happens when they are armed? by DondeEstaTuPantalone · · Score: 1

    Spare me the talk of "call the police." The police can't or won't do anything in these cases. Where I went to school (suburb outside large metro area) the bullies weren't "jocks." Kicking their ass is the LAST thing you should (or will) do. Playing (key phrase) friendly is often the best bet - even in cases like mine. In 3rd-5th grade => fight back. Maybe. pre/high school => don't fight - run, unless you're a Charles Bronsen wannabe...

    --
    No esta aqui!
  187. website = easy lawsuit? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    Not sure how easy it'd be in England to sue over this since that's where the incident took place, but here in the US I imagine a lawsuit would soon follow, and the fact that everything's online would make evidence oh-so-easy, and with the recent school shooting in the US I don't think a judge would be too nice to the bullies. Police might be interested too.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  188. Paul Graham's article on "Why Nerds are Unpopular" by SlashdotStu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am surprised that no one has cited this article yet: Why Nerds are Unpopular.

    Paul raises several ideas which are interesting...

    Like a politician who wants to distract voters from bad times at home, you can create an enemy if there isn't a real one. By singling out and persecuting a nerd, a group of kids from higher in the hierarchy create bonds between themselves: attacking an outsider makes them all insiders. This is why the worst cases of bullying happen with groups. Ask any nerd: you get much worse treatment from a group of kids than from any individual bully, however sadistic.

  189. Simpsons by blueberry(4*atan(1)) · · Score: 1

    It's like those snotty twin girls on the Simpsons!

  190. Nothing new by Belgand · · Score: 1

    So basically the problem is that people are spreading rumours using the internet? I, for one, am astounded! Who would ever think to malign the internet so?

    Ok, so yes, bullying is a problem and the schools sure as hell aren't doing anything to help with it when kids are there (I think the Onion put it best with "Columbine Jocks Safely Resume Bullying"), but this really isn't anything especially new. It's like claiming the school needs to do something about kids writing notes to each other spreading rumours, or prevent them from phoning each other to spread them.

    It doesn't seem that things have quite reached the level of extortion and serious crime and I'm not saying that it's acceptable, but this is something that's going to go on regardles of the medium being used. This is little more than a vague link to the internet used for the hell of it. I expected this crap back in '97 but not now. I mean, really, "Cyber-bullying"? Who in their right mind would ever use that?

  191. Who cares? by muffen · · Score: 1

    ... only geeks that get bullied anyways.. why do the /. crowd care about that? :)

    Post bad things about me below here --->

  192. my Friends kid had this problem by abolith · · Score: 1
    So he placed him into a BJJ class and after about 4 months he started getting pretty good, lost a bunch of weight, got a girlfriend and broke the arm of the next kid who attacked him. Now the e/mails and other sorts of bullying have stopped and he is really starting to enjoy life at school.

    Solution to bullying: Teach your kid how to defend him/herself, and how to put up a website of thier own of course ; }

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  193. Re:Oh man...slightly off topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust me, you don't want to be in real estate. That's where the bullies and dropouts wind up!

  194. Shoot'em. by Randseed · · Score: 1

    The solution to this is more Columbines, albeit better directed at the offenders. No, seriously, think about it. (I'm not saying it's the IDEAL solution, mind you.)

    After enough picked-on kids get pissed off and beat to death, shoot, publically humiliate, etc., the bullies, it will stop.

    The root of the problem is that the schools back the bullies up, not the victims. If a kid defends himself, *he* is expelled or suspended half the time. The end result is that we have fewer fucking juvenile sociopaths out there.

    Fuck the bullies. Fuck the education system.

  195. Am I alone on this . . . by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

    Am I seriously the only damn person who reads slashdot that was never bullied in school. Jesus. I hang out with a bunch of geeks. I'm outta here . . .

  196. Re:Typical love-fest article: no punishment discus by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    I wouldnt think that suspension would be any deterent for a bully. What would work much better is humiliation.

    Eg, being forced to wear a sandwich board with the word "loser" in bright orange letters.

  197. Kids shouldn't HAVE to deal with it! by gidds · · Score: 1
    You know what I did when I got picked on? I picked back.

    I'm glad that worked for you. Please understand that it doesn't work in every case. It certainly didn't work for me; clever put-downs, withering looks, abuse in kind, aggression, physical violence, ignoring it, walking away, suffering in silence, looking for help... nothing worked. Nothing. I never found a way to stop it. Arriving at uni and finding that life wasn't always like that was a complete revelation to me.

    At least, there is no physical harm done in cyber-bullying.

    Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can wound deeper still, can obliterate self-respect, build psychological walls, destroy personality, make life almost unbearable. Believe me. With verbal abuse there's no effective way to fight back, no evidence to show anyone, nothing for people to take seriously. It can go on constantly, under the noses of teachers or other adults, takes no effort on the part of the abusers, and can be dismissed as oversensitivity or immaturity. It's precisely because there's no physical harm that it can be so pervasive, and so overlooked.

    It's hard to explain just how it affected me. I probably suffered very little compared to some - I'm no martyr, and it didn't stop me having a fairly normal childhood, with no obvious lasting damage. I can recall very few actual incidents. But it was always there, always with me, a constant faint background of hatred and cruelty, grinding me down, making me weary and miserable. It started because of my height (I was the shortest kid in the school two years running, though I caught up later), but once it got started there was no way to stop it - and believe me, I tried. I rarely thought "I'm being picked on", because at some level I just assumed that's how life was.

    No doubt I was immature and annoying, and probably deserved some of it. No doubt some of it wasn't meant too seriously, and I should have just shrugged it off; and no doubt if many of the kids had realised just how much it hurt, they wouldn't have done so. I don't hold any grudges now (though I came a long way before I could say that). But I wouldn't wish it on anyone.

    Even now, when I occasionally visit the school building (on unrelated business, and with no kids present) I still find it difficult. It still reminds me of how things were, of how I was - and it's something I really don't want to be reminded of. Even writing this post has been more difficult and painful than I expected.

    I'm not suggesting laws or rules or bureaucracy or lawsuits or whatever. You can't stop people talking, you can't stop them laughing, you can't change their attitudes. But please don't dismiss non-physical abuse. I hope none of you knows just how much it can hurt.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    1. Re:Kids shouldn't HAVE to deal with it! by arose · · Score: 1
      It certainly didn't work for me; clever put-downs, withering looks, abuse in kind, aggression, physical violence, ignoring it, walking away, suffering in silence, looking for help... nothing worked. Nothing. I never found a way to stop it.
      Too true, the worse of it was that I couldn't see why they were doing it to me.
      Arriving at uni and finding that life wasn't always like that was a complete revelation to me.
      In my first year I though the same thing, but it turned out that just survinging up to that time had burned me out. I fell into depression the second year and got trown out, now I'm trying to pick up my life again and figure out what to do now.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    2. Re: Kids shouldn't HAVE to deal with it! by gidds · · Score: 1
      the worse of it was that I couldn't see why they were doing it to me.

      I know - that only adds to the frustration. But beyond a certain point, I don't think it really matters. Whatever reason there might be isn't going to stop it, isn't going to suddenly make everything all right.

      As I said, a while later I've come to the conclusion that in many cases kids just don't empathise; they don't see you as a human being with feelings just as valid as their own. So they don't see any reason not to take their own frustrations/hangups/personal problems out on you. It's really not meant personally. Of course, that doesn't help much - even if you understand all that, it's hard not to let it affect you; and it's doubly hard when you're young and don't have the maturity, experience, and confidence to cope.

      Self-confidence takes a long time to build back up. If you have some close friends who you can talk to, that can help. (Or if not, set about making some!) I also found it helped to think myself back there, to mentally go back and face it again, with the experience you've gained since. It's traumatic, but it helped me come to terms with some of it. And then try to move on - after all, the world's much bigger than any of our schools, and the vast majority of people in it are far more civilised!

      I hope you get sorted out.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  198. Re: Your fundamental right to safety and dignity. by gidds · · Score: 1
    It may be an option, but is it a solution? What if it's more than just a couple of people? What if the abuse is never enough to justify anything like that (but never little enough to ignore)? What if you fight back but it doesn't stop them?

    I agree that this is a far-from-perfect world, and that violence - as a last resort - may solve some problems. But there are many that it won't solve.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  199. Violence and growing up by dkhoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the most important parts of growing up is learning how to deal with violence. In particular, learning when to use violence, and when not to use violence. Learning when and how to escalate or deescalate a violent encounter. Violence is a part of society and of human existence. It is inescapable. As long as we have fists and teeth there will be bullying, robbery, rape and war, and the need to defend oneself from these. Violence is neither right nor wrong in and of itself. It is a merely a tool.

    For example, if a thief snatched a purse from an old woman and three guys jumped the thief and beat him up, they would be heroes and their action would be morally right. If three guys jump a random guy on the street and thrash him, they would be criminals and morally wrong. If you are threatened with a gun and you shoot back with your own gun, your use of violence would be justified. If someone called you names and you shot him, you would be wrong.

    A child needs to learn these things and more. If he is male in many societies, he will be expected to be the defender of his family and his nation. He may have to mercilessly kill and maim as a soldier if his nation is under attack, the ultimate shame and the ultimate honor. He must come to terms with that.

    How a child responds to bullying and whether or not he bullies others is part of the process of learning about violence. It will determine whether he eventually becomes a felon, a bully, a coward, a doormat, or simply a well-adjusted member of society. I feel that many children aren't learning the right lessons. The whole topic has somehow become taboo in public discourse, like sex education was in the past.

    If a child is forbidden to fight back, even after all reasonable peaceful methods of resolving the issue have been exhausted, then he will learn to be walked on. He will never learn when and how much violence is right or wrong and develop a healthy spectrum of responses to violence. These are the people who will silently be bullied one day, then kill everyone with SMGs the next, since they know of nothing between total submission and total war. Conversely, if a child is allowed to bully others, or to escalate to violence before peaceful means are exhausted, then he is on his way to jail if nothing is done.

    There is some happy medium between psychopath and pacifist, between bully and victim. It is enshrined in a society's laws and culture, and transmitted through media and family. A child needs to discover it. He needs to learn how to respond to an insult, a malicious rumor, a threat, a punch, a gun and a war. It's just part of growing up.

    Never start a fight, but always end one. Violence must be avoided as far as possible, but no further. Violence is always wrong, but sometimes it is also right.

    1. Re:Violence and growing up by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That is the most wholly true thing I have heard all week.

  200. Re:It's NEW and DANGEROUS because it's the INTERNE by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1
    I abhor lazy journalism that finds sensationalism in dressing up something as old as time (pornography, bullying, copying music) in Internet clothes, just because it's easier to scare people that way.

    Agreed ... on the copying music front, the other day I came across an article from the Manchester Guardian entitled "Music piracy in Liverpool" (or perhaps it was Leeds). The year was 1913, and the mode of piracy was unauthorised reprinting of sheet music!

    --
    The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  201. Cyber bullying...It's the same, just modernized... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 1

    Cyber bullying...What? It's the same thing that has been happening from the dawn of time, just modernized. The spreading of half-truths and outright lies, teasing, bullying, etc is, in mind, good for kids. A kid needs to learn how to deal with unfavorable situations.

    I was a nerd growing up and got picked on for it. It made me a stronger person and prepared me for life where everything isn't a rosy picture. The kids today are being raised as wimps so that they don't get their feelings hurt. Everyone's a winner! There are no losers!

    I am glad I'm not a kid now.

    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  202. Geek Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geek Alert!

  203. Oooooh well. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    I have a better idea than making up restrictive school policies, which will inevitably lead to problems for all the people in the future, as laws get increasingly restrictive.

    Instead of making up restrictive laws, let's loosen the laws up, allow everybody to buy guns, swords, and other weapons, and bring back the duel. In other words, if some jerk says something behind your back, you go up, slap him with a white glove, challenge him to a duel, and then take witnesses with you to the prescribed time and place. As long as both parties consent to the duel, you CANNOT be punished for maiming or killing the other person.

    That would lead to a very reasonable system of law, where everybody would respect everybody, or be shot.

    Survival of the fittest.

  204. A call to arms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm reading these comments here so far, and the general attitude is, "Wow, that really sucks....I remember when I was a kid and [insert anectode here]." .... C'mon people! This is fucking Slashdot....news for NERDS!

    We need to be sticking up for our own. If some dickhead little white trash piece of shit kid is fucking with future Slashdotters on the web, we need to take action. If it's okay for Fyodor to digitally bitchslap a troll who embarassed him, then certainly, as a collective whole, we can put our hacking efforts into embarassing these bullying little pricks.

    I propose we have a new Slashdot category called cyber-bullies where people can profile a web site that's attacking some poor kid. The Slashdot commnity can then deal with it accordingly.

  205. Cyber Bullying? It not new at all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS is doing it for years! Netscape is its first victim if my memory serve...

  206. Morons.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they - the kids being bullied, or their parents - have to do is this:

    1) Go to the kid doing the bullying - tell him to stop it or you'll take it to the next level. Contact the school so they're aware of it as well.

    2) When the dumbass doesn't stop - you call the police and have the little shit and his parents arrested for harrasment by wire. Specifically, using a cell phone to intimidate the kid being bullied.

    3) If they put up a website which contains untrue allegations, then you file a lawsuit against the kid doing the bullying and the parents for slander, liable, defamation of character.

    4) Add the school to the lawsuit if they didn't suspend the bully, or at least try to intervene in any meaningful manner...

    5) As part of the lawsuit, you ask that the kid not be allowed to touch a cell phone until he's 18.

    6) As part of the lawsuit, you want a public apology written by the bully - signed by the bully and his parents, and published in a local newspaper (full page ad) and in the school newspaper. Have the assholes at the school sign it too.

    7) Ask for attorney's fees, punitative damages, compensatory damages.

    *bully gets beaten to a pulp by his parents* End of story.

  207. Great. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    But you will notice that Bullies are typically the kids who are already well adapted to taking advantage of such brutal systems. Indeed, your average bully would glow with pleasure if such tactics were made legal! I don't think most regular kids would be happy about needing to waste tons of energy mastering the art of violence just to be able to function in society.

    Regular people just want to live their lives. They do not want to live in constant, shell-shocked fear of some false-bravado asshole waving a gun in their face at some percieved insult to their ego-impaired machismo.

    This is an incredibly stupid idea which never fails to be trucked out by some short-sighted armchair logic nitwit. Move to a lawless country where this idiot idea is reality, or shut the hell up. --Or better yet, join a street gang where lack of respect is also punishable by death, because that system certainly works to keep people civilized and whining bullets out of school yards which are filled with everybody else who isn't a fucking moron.


    -FL

    1. Re:Great. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

      You seem to forget one thing about the duel: Nobody forces you to accept a challenge to a duel if you are challenged. Note, also, that it is still illegal to use violence without the consent of the opposing party. For the purposes of freedom, however, it should be allowed for two consenting people to engage in a duel if that will help them to reconcile their differences of opinion on some matter.

  208. Attempting to shed light on the responses you got by UpnAtom · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Remember those situations where somebody at school would say something weird or awkward, an uncomfortable silence follows until somebody breaks it with a witty remark.

    Well, you just said something weird and awkward, dude. Nobody likes feeling uncomfortable and will support anyone who helps them feel better, even if they are a tosser.

    liquidsin's comment wasn't funny because he put down ebh, but because he parodied the above situation.

    Bullying is part of human nature. You can't eliminate it in schools, and if you did, you'd only be depriving kids of a chance to learn how to deal with it in the real world.

    Chronically-bullied kids need to be taught skills to deal with these situations. Martial arts (to deal with confrontation), humour (to get everyone on your side) & game theory (understanding the basic psychology of situations) all helped me.

  209. No by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    That is the same bullshit logic that dictatorships use, and the same logic behind the MPAA sponsored law against having pre release movies. 3 years is a totally excessive punishment for a having a digital copy of something. The theory is, of course, make the punishment so harsh that noone wants to break the law. Well that is just wrong in so many ways. It's wrong on the slippery slope that leads to executions for minor crimes (after all, we don't want people doing them). It's wrong in that everyone fucks up and little fuckups shouldn't carry big punishments. But mostly it's wrong because it isn't fair and is EXPLICITLY forbidden by the constituion. Ammendment 8 forbids cruel and unusal punishments and excessive fines. This is more generally construed that the punishment must fit the crime.

    Then we also have a concept that minors aren't as responsible for their actions. Any deceant psychologist will tell you that children (with very few exceptions) do NOT think like adults do. Along those lines, children are cruel without knowing better. Now, we do need to train them to become functioning adult citizens but throwing them in jail and kicking them out of school is NOT the way to do that.

    Think what you are saying: For harassing someone, something almost everyone did at one time or another, they should be denied further public education and thrown in with REAL criminals. How bloody silly is that? Do shit like that, and you'll be turning kids into criminals. If they get no education except for that in jail they'll end up on the wrong side of life REAL quick.

    However, maybe you are just an authoritarian on the scale that makes Ashcroft seem weak. If so, I suggest you do some research on an ultra authoritarian country. Singapore would be a good choice. You'll find that it DOES have benefits, but that the cost is amazingly high to the guilty and the innocent alike. If it appeals to you, perhaps consider moving, because this country was founded on freedom, and on giving people the benefit of the doubt.

    1. Re:No by pauljlucas · · Score: 1
      ... we do need to train [bullies] to become functioning adult citizens ...
      By doing what, exactly? In all your ranting about how bad my idea is, you haven't provided a better solution.

      As far as I'm concerned, many kids that are bullies are already "damaged goods" that will most likely grow up to be bullies as adults. Society would be better off without them.

      ... this country was founded on freedom ...
      Yes? So? Freedom in the USA is a privilege, not a right: your freedom can be taken away. If you impinge on somebody else's freedom, yours should end.
      ... and on giving people the benefit of the doubt.
      That's what "guity beyond reasonable doubt" is for. It's already built-in. But that doesn't mean we should stop procecuting people. If they're found not guitly because the amount of doubt is unreasonable, the system will have worked.
      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  210. What about Mr. T? by TPFH · · Score: 1

    Bully get's publically humiliated on national TV.

    Not only should they show the bully bullying the kid, they should then bring in Mr. T who will proceed to beat the crap out of the little $#*@#&#, or at least give him a wedgie.

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
    1. Re:What about Mr. T? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      Bully get's publically humiliated on national TV.

      Not only should they show the bully bullying the kid, they should then bring in Mr. T who will proceed to beat the crap out of the little $#*@#&#, or at least give him a wedgie.


      Talk shows have been doing this for years: "Boot Camp". Get big ass dude dressed up like a DI yelling at bully. 2003 version of the Two Minute Hate.

      Oh, one flaw: show video to Bully's parents, parents counter by getting lawyer to draw up C&D and sue for damages and humiliation.

      Unless your lawyer can beat up their lawyer.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  211. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose this is another example of an inevitable downside to the interconnected world.

    This is another example of American culture, no more and no less.

  212. Re:bully comming back with gun or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this may be one of those situations that depend on the area that one lives in.

    Living near Detroit, I get the feeling that there are schools where the bully just might come back with a gun. (Note that these aren't reported as 'school shootings' ala Columbine, but instead are reported as 'gang shootings'. The difference being how many classmates get shot)

    However, I would agree that in most places the bully probably just moves on.

  213. Freedom IS a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you have forgotten about that "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" part.

    What you are confused about is that while freedom is a right, there are limits. Free speech for example is limited with respect to shouting "fire" in a theater, or more on topic, it is limited w.r.t. slander and libal.

  214. Neo, Smith, & Cyber-Bullying by lo_fye · · Score: 1

    How long will it be until someone says "These cyber-bullies are terrorists waiting to happen -- they need to be jailed now!"
    Patriot Act my ass -- it allows that sort of thing to happen.

    I was bullied as a kid, but I turned out just fine, and when I visit my hometown, the bullies are still there, but now they pump that sweet sweet Iraqi gasoline into my American-Made Ford Mustang. I never smelled a sweeter victory than that.

    Moral of the story: life is a series of ups and downs, and you can't really appreciate the ups without experiencing the downs.I wouldn't have the massive pleasure of the gas pumping now, if they hadn't bullied me then.

    We are Neo, they are Smith, and Karma balances out the equation.

    --
    geeks are cats who dig a certain kind of cool
  215. Ah the joys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I went to a private high school. The education was excellent, the experience undoubtedly less so. I had a smaller stature than most of the other guys and much less athletic. I received the daily tauntings and the occasional beating. I was given detention a couple times by being framed for things I didn't do. Administration didn't seem to care about truth. I "sucked it up" and kept on with my life. Fortunately, I had a stable, loving home to retreat to at the end of the day.


    Now it's 18 years down the road from high school. The "sucking it up" years have nicely evolved into 13 years of panic attacks and it's oh-so-much-fun to know that if I want to spend time driving my wife and beautiful son around the countryside, I can't do it without the help of Xanax. I've probably spent 20 or 30K$USD on shrinks and meds to maintain some outward semblance of a normal life. Except when I'm have to get from point A to point B, I'm finally happy inside and at peace with myself (and I'm not on any "maintenance meds" any longer, only Xanax when I need to drive or travel).


    But hey, at least I've got a higher earning potential than the cretins that fucked with me.


    While violence doesn't solve anything in principle, I'm going to teach my son that the first person to touch him in a bullying fashion *deserves* a complimentary transformation into a bloody pile of flesh, bodily fluids and bone fragments. Why? Simple. I firmly believe that had I gone this route and nipped the bullying I received right when it started, I would have saved myself 4 years of being fairly miserable in school and 13 years (and counting) of ungodly stress afterwards, just trying to be a normalish member of society.


    (if you're wondering why I didn't get panic attacks in college, the only assumption I can draw is the excessive alcohol consumption which tended to keep me in enough of a fog that I could function. yay. go me.)


    If the bullying happens online, it's slander and/or libel. As much as I *despise* the USian legal system, the arguable best route is to file a suit that would make Gates' net worth look like pocket change on the parents of the miscreant who posted it. Take your pick - defamation of character, slander, libel, mental anguish & cruelty .. just ask any ambulance chaser - they'll give you the laundry list. Go for their retirement, their home, their cars, their income for the next 50 years, and their gold fillings. Make darn sure the case gets a ton of media coverage in your town. If they try to settle out of court, make sure the settlement is public and make sure it's for a LARGE sum. 20, 50 or 100K$USD isn't sufficient. Otherwise, let it go to a jury - odds are good that at least 9 of the 12 jury members were bullied in school too. If/when you win, donate the proceeds to child development causes, child healthcare research, or set up a charitable organization which pays for therapy for children of families who can't afford it. Maybe then .. just maybe .. parents might get the idea that they really ARE responsible for their kid's actions. At the end of the day, it's not about lining your pocket, it's about bettering the world at the expense of those who worsen it.

  216. Kind of like *Prison* by Chriscypher · · Score: 1

    I recall a documentary on prison life some years ago where the inmate being interviewed explained that assaults and murders took place because something had to finally give.

    The inmates in conflict had to face each other day in and day out for the next many years, with no way of avoiding each other. Conflict was unavoidable. Someone eventually had to be taken down a notch or 6.

    This is much like school, as well described by the parent post above. I really wonder if the escalation of violence in schools is due to inescapable, required attendance.

    If its Fight or Flight, and flight is not an option, what else could occur?!

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  217. bullying doesnt stop at graduation by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Some bullies continue on into the adult life. You have street gangs, obnoxious neighbors, CEOs and presidental cabinets, to name a few.

  218. Deep pockets? Better hope so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, I could post on an open forum that I think you're an absolute shithead, and this violates no law whatsoever. I could also say that I suspect you're an AIDS-carrying fudge-packing meat-spanking loser, and this too is a form of protected free speech.

    Well, yeah, but that won't stop someone with deep enough pockets from suing you to (financial) death. Even if they lose, are you willing to spend x thousand dollars/pounds/euros/whatever to defend your self or your brat posting this garbage online?

  219. lp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    last post, woot!

    1. Re:lp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU FAIL IT!!

  220. Doesn't work by Animats · · Score: 1

    The trouble with fighting back is that if you do it ineffectively, you get clobbered, and if you do it effectively, you go to jail for assault and battery. You need legal advice before beating up a bully today. You can't seriously damage them when they're not directly attacking you.

  221. Re:hell no by octalgirl · · Score: 1

    That is so old-school - and the reason why bullying still exists today. Violence should never be ignored. It forces the victim to be silent and suffer alone as if they deserved it or did something to cause it (never true), and allows the bullying to continue until it escalates out of control - this is when someone gets hurt - usually the victim again. Trust me, if you have a kid getting bullied in school or on the streets - the very last thing you want to tell them is to ignore it. Hell no. Violence, sexual harrassement, phone stalking, threating emails are all against the law in most states, and if not they are sure to be breaking some type of policy. If the school won't fix it, you can sue the school because schools are federally mandated to provided a SAFE educational environment. Also the police can be called. No - we do not ignore what in reality is a violent crime.

    I was bullied greatly in hs and told to ignore it - can you tell?

  222. Re:hell no by scrabblenut · · Score: 1

    So true. There is so much children are allowed to do to each other that when they get older they'd be criminally prosecuted for. No, I am not talking about saying someone's shoes look funny. But ambushing someone outside the school, forcing their pants down, getting everyone to point and laugh, these are all (sexual) assult crimes as adults! A child at school has to either learn to "fight back" or learn to "get along" or "ignore" it. If someone were to do that outside my place of employment do you think people would just tell me to "deal with it" without looking absolutely stupid? It would be an absolute embarrassment to admit that you let someone get away with that in an adult setting. Yet, as a child, you just have to shrug your shoulders, say "oh well life sucks" and happily carry on in the same environment the next day with your abusers AND learn the material you're sent to school to learn?

    I am so glad to be an adult, and I now see why children are often in a great hurry to grow up :)

  223. Unfortunately, not always. by ShadowSystems · · Score: 1

    "Bulling only gets worst when parents get involved. Just tell kids to ignore it, and the bullies will move on to someone else after awhile."

    My son is in accellerated learning courses (7th grade, doing 10th grade Science & Math, and 11th grade English), so can be construed as a reasonably intelligent young man.

    Last year, one of his fellow students decided to bully & pester him incessantly.

    My son did what I felt was an appropriate escalation of response:

    1) Attempted to talk to the young man, trying to get to the root of WHY the bullying was happening

    2) Told his teacher that the young man was bothering him & asked for either the bully to be moved or offered to move himself to another section of the classroom

    3) Complained to his Student Counselor about the bully.

    NONE of these actions stopped the bully. NO ONE made ANY attempt to punish the little thug.

    So, when one day during a test, my son noticed the bully trying to cheat off him, my son curled his arm around his test paper in such a way as to prevent the peaking. The bully reached out, grabbed my son's arm, and moved it saying "Don't do that, I can't see when you do that."

    My son snapped, and promptly stabbed his Number 2 pencil through the little twits sweater nailing his arm to the desk yelling "LEAVE ME ALONE, DAMN IT!"

    They tried to suspend my son for being physically violent, yet when the fact that the bully had been pestering my son for nearly six months unchecked came to light, I offered to press charges against the school for allowing the situation to continue in the first place.
    ("Let me get this straight. You've known that this boy has been bullying my son for six months and never bothered to tell anyone about it? My son has reported to you that [the bully] followed him home saying he was going to kick [my son's] ass, and you didn't bother to contact ME? I've got news for you, folks, there isn't a lawyer on the planet that wouldn't drool like a Pavlovian dog over the level of fsck-up on your part, and the amounts of money THEY could make prosecuting you into a very deep hole. Yes, what my son did was wrong, but against the actions of the bully and YOU, they so pale in comparison as to be meaningless.")

    Both my son and I accepted the fact that his actions were wrong, stabbing someone isn't right unless it's in defense of your life, but we accepted it ONLY on the condition that the School accept the fact that they shirked their duties in maintaining a protected atmosphere condusive to learning. (Their words, not mine, in their "Parent Teacher Agreement" forms we had to sign upon registering him for school in the first place.)

    In the end, they expelled the bully, set him AND his parents to counseling, and suspended my son for *one day* ("to reflect on what he'd done").

    Since then, my son has improved his ability to deal with idiots, his grades have gotten better, and he's MUCH more likely to become a well-adjusted adult knowing that he doesn't have to "take it" from idiots who deserve to have their asses handed to them.

    Martial arts classes have helped him remain calm, focused, and in control of his anger, as well as giving him the knowledge of body mechanics to do more "acceptable" methods of showing someone that he's not interested in being picked upon. (There's nothing like having him offer his hand to shake, and suddenly finding yourself lying in a heap a few feet away, on your back, cartoon stars twirling about your head, and the chirping of birds filling your ears as you realize that an *eleven year old* just flipped you like a rag dool. heheheh)

    So parental intervention is sometimes a VERY good way to keep matters from escalating into acts of violence (ESPECIALLY if the school isn't doing it's job in the first place) between students.

    Granted, not in EVERY case, but I'd be willing to bet more often than not.

  224. What about Mr. Hat? by TPFH · · Score: 1

    Talk shows have been doing this for years: "Boot Camp"

    Well, I was being facetious when I suggested Mr. T beat these kids up. I hadn't thought of the "boot camp" thing. Actually, the "boot camp" thing disgusts me. I wonder why the kids in it don't just sit there or go limp or whatever. I suppose non-violent resistance doesn't occure to bullies.

    I guess I was thinking of the Silver Spoons episode. Rather silly. Whatever.

    Maybe I should at least have been more 90s and suggested Mr. Hat. Whatever.

    --
    This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
  225. I know. It still doesn't work. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Bully the sword-wizard mistreats you however he pleases; kicks sand in your face, whatever.

    "What? You got a problem with that? You chicken, McFly?! Draw!"

    The only difference between this and highschool, (where the duel has basically been in practice since the first school bell ever rang), is that now there'd be a legal body count, the psychotic rush a bully gets from the transfer of power starts at a dangerously high level, and everybody gets to walk around with an extra fear in their gut.

    In any case, I know adults who will roll up their sleeves and beat the shit out of each other to solve conflicts. (I live in a very rural area). No laws are broken, and its quite rare that lives are lost. Why involve lethality just to proove machismo? --And it would certainly come to that! With a 'legal dueling age,' young men eager to proove their masculinity and to justify all the practice they put into gun and sword training, would seek out idiot duels.

    Feudal Japan once more? The Wild West once again? These days I can speak my mind to anybody I choose with the reasonable assurance that I won't be challenged to life or death combat over a political difference or for looking at some bozo's girlfriend. I do not think a return to the days of fear are a step toward a more civilized society. Those sorts of societies ALWAYS favor war-lords. Kings were abandoned in favor of democracy for a reason.


    -FL

  226. You may not have gotten first post by Best+Post · · Score: 0

    Cycles of violence are usually stopped by violence. Bullies don't understand compassion or logic.

    But you sure got BEST POST.