Slashdot Mirror


Implanted RFID Tag To Replace Cash?

Kulic writes "Wired is running a story about using subdermal RFID microchips to pay for goods. Applied Digital Solutions are marketing the VeriChip as the world's only implantable ID technology. CEO Scott Silverman says they could someday replace credit cards, but a final product is a few years away. They are also receiving condemnation from some fundamentalist Christians who believe that this is the fabled 'mark of the beast' of biblical lore." waytoomuchcoffee adds a link to a similar story at CNet.

793 comments

  1. NOT RIGHT by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is not right. It violates privacy, integrity, and it makes me feel non-human.

    Stop treating us like MACHINES and maybe people will start acting nicely again. I AM NOT A MACHINE.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:NOT RIGHT by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quiet down, Unit 432101.

    2. Re:NOT RIGHT by musikit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      that is more like Unit 770-11-1234

    3. Re:NOT RIGHT by Total_Wimp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More specifically, stop treating us like ATM machines for coporations. What if I don't want to or like to spend money? What if I don't want to give my time (going to work), my dignity (begging for loans), my privacy (everywhere!) and now my very body to make if more convienient for companies to grab my cash.

      This proposal is like someone who asks to fuck you before they've bought you flowers or even kissed you. At least have the decensy to lie to us that it's real purpose is "medical information" or "education" before swooping down on our wallets.

      TW

    4. Re:NOT RIGHT by timbloid · · Score: 1

      Don't Panic!!

      We've yet to see credit cards with your face on,
      smart cash cards that you load up at an atm,
      payment by biometric,
      payments by mobile phone,
      and all the other "labour and time saving" ideas the EPOS manufacturers keep banging on about in order that they sell more tills...

      Bring back the abacus, and the bartering system...

      That's what I say...

    5. Re:NOT RIGHT by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      More like unit 639622

    6. Re:NOT RIGHT by DZign · · Score: 1

      We've yet to see credit cards with your face on

      Sorry but there are banks which issue Visa cards with your picture on it. Sold it as 'more secure'..

    7. Re:NOT RIGHT by BorgDrone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Treating people as humans is exactly the reason why people shouldn't be given names but unique numbers.

      There must be lots of people with the name 'jack' or 'leo' or whatever. there will be only ONE person called HUMAN_ID_0532134159123843892341 , that's a name that makes you totally unique.

    8. Re:NOT RIGHT by Kulaid982 · · Score: 1

      Bring back the abacus, and the bartering system...

      Did anyone else read that as "bartending"?

      You know, the system by which you and I square up our financial differences at the bar, I give the bartender my money, you get beer, we're even?

      --

      Isn't it interesting how you come to recognize posters based solely on their sigs???
    9. Re:NOT RIGHT by Ryosen · · Score: 1

      And, after all, isn't that what we all want: To feel unique and special?

      --

      Ryosen
      One man's "Troll, +1" is another man's "Insightful, +1".
    10. Re:NOT RIGHT by Lonath · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. So stop whining 639622.

    11. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Well, the way things are going, it won't be long before you can go to the government and claim your whining, crybaby attitude as a disability. Then you'll be able to stay home weeping as the rest of us have the results of our productive work taken away and given to you.

      "Total Wimp" seems to be an appropriate nick for you.

    12. Re:NOT RIGHT by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just like everyone else!

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:NOT RIGHT by rylin · · Score: 1

      This proposal is like someone who asks to fuck you before they've bought you flowers or even kissed you.

      Bring it on!

    14. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We've yet to see credit cards with your face on,
      It exist for a couple of years now...

      > smart cash cards that you load up at an atm,
      They tried to do it(They done some small scale testing), but they had a security issue with the system
      > payment by biometric,
      It is just too expensive, you'll never see it... well not for now... and There is too many false positive or false negative
      > payments by mobile phone,
      I beleive they have it in japan do they?

    15. Re:NOT RIGHT by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ok...lets all take the 'Non-Conformist Oath'!!

      Repeat after me:

      I promise to be different.....

      I promise to be unique........

      I promise NOT to repeat things other people say...

      Good!

      With apologies to Steve Martin...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:NOT RIGHT by Vexar · · Score: 1
      Ahem. Costco in the US and Canada has "chargeable" cash cards. I concur with the other person who has identified that the credit cards do sometimes come with your photo on them. I'm almost positive your post was meant as sarcasm. I thought in Norway you could buy soda pop with your cellular phone.

      I can just imagine the bill: 342 minutes peak air time, 506 night/weekend air time, 14 cans of Code Red Mountain Dew, and a slew of unauthorized charges by a phone cloner for services described with more scurrilous terms than are fit to print in slashdot. Don't doubt that they've thought of Instant Messages put to use for instant gratification:

      Shaakit BB! $15
      luv me 10der! $30
      The devil has power over the world. People who serve money belong to the world. When this subdermal business becomes required upon pain of death, then you can start listening to the clamoring of the end-time-focused Christians' warnings. Until then, just listen to the message of love they are supposed to be sharing (instead of this doom and gloom stuff).

    17. Re:NOT RIGHT by monkeyfinger · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.

    18. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATM machines? Automated Teller Machine machines? Do they force you to make ATMs?

    19. Re:NOT RIGHT by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      You UN-American bastard! Turn yourself in and wait quietly for the Thought Police to come pick you up.

      Capitalism is the new religion.

    20. Re:NOT RIGHT by retinaburn · · Score: 1

      It is a volunteer program, which is at least two years down the road. But I guess how having other people have the option for this could make you feel non-human. Seeing some of the people on fox shows makes me feel non-human too.

    21. Re:NOT RIGHT by seraph93 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Haven't you heard? Taking money from us isn't a *privilege* the corporations have, it's a *right.* Supporting them with your money isn't your choice, it's your duty. If you don't like it, too bad. They have enough resources to buy whatever legislation it takes to get you to comply.

      This proposal is like someone who asks to fuck you before they've bought you flowers or even kissed you.

      No it isn't. When someone asks for a quickie, you can say no. You don't have an option here. You're a consumer, not a citizen. You're a source of revenue, not a human being. So bend over already! And don't forget to buy some flowers this time.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    22. Re:NOT RIGHT by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the Costco cash cards myself, but if they're anything like the gift cards that most retailers use, it's just a magstripe card tied to some account balance in a central database. The risk is someone could clone the card and spend the money in the account (sucks for the customer), but you can't tamper with the card and add more money to it which is possible on a smartcard with internal storage.

    23. Re:NOT RIGHT by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      1- What makes you think that cash transactions are really private? They may be harder to trace than entirely electronic transactions, but there is no reason to assume that using cash makes a transaction private.

      2- How does this violate integrity? If anything, it enhances integrity by making fraudulent transactions of any type much harder.

      3- How does simplifying spending make one less human? If anything, it makes me feel *MORE* human because eventually I can just have one little chip replace my credit cards, driver's license, insurance card, and be able to inform EMTs that I am epileptic. Know what that means? Less stuff in my pocket. Less hassle. Less to think about. And more time to devote to the thing that really does make me human- rational thought.

      You paranoids really need to get over this deranged fear that RFID will somehow strip away your silly illusion of privacy. Nobody needs RFID to find out everything you do. These new technologies aren't about stripping away your humanity. It's all about making life easier for everyone, so that we can do more with our humanity.

    24. Re:NOT RIGHT by sp67 · · Score: 1
      Quiet down, Unit 432101.

      Aaahhh, Slashdot... Check your facts before posting, he's Unit 639622, fer crying out loud!

      --
      Tuff that Smatters.
    25. Re:NOT RIGHT by Buskaatt · · Score: 1

      You're right. There's a certain trust in a transaction where you have to sign your name for what you're buying, or count out exact change. It's a transaction, but it's also a contract, between you and the supplier of your product. It's something to take more seriously than just bleeping your finger over a scanner, taking the bag, and walking out.

      I've never thought about this before, but it seems to me that the transaction was one of the first conversations ever held. It has continued since we humans have been able to communicate. Lately, despite all the new mediums through which we communicate, people actualy seem to communicate less. Maybe the loss of the transaction as a ritual, is just another step.

    26. Re:NOT RIGHT by Directrix1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't wait to go wardriving for people's personal account info. Fun! Also, I can't wait for the future where when I get robbed, instead of just losing petty cash, I lose my entire account and I get my hand chopped off too. Even more fun.

      But seriously though, why don't we all just have credit card size cards that require a pin to use, and instead of giving out an account number to sellers. It gives out a RSA signed transaction using the card's private key, and public x509 cert (issued by visa of course). And it does this through a connector on the edge that has a male on left female on right jack so you can just hook two cards together, or jack your card into your bank to get more cash. Doesn't this make a bit more sense. You can have cards that only carry a certain amount for petty cash.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    27. Re:NOT RIGHT by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      It isn't something we have to do. This thing is effectively a credit card that we can't lose, leave at home, etc. Carry it around in your pocket, implant it under the skin of your forearm, no major difference. Personally, after today, I'd love to have my credit card implanted in my body. I left my Shell Club card home, and had to pay an extra 25 cents a gallon for gas. Then I get to work and realize I have no quarters, so I can't get breakfast from the vending machines. Then, on my lunch break, I realize I don't have any form of currency on me whatsoever, and I didn't even get to eat.

      Much as they tell me "Don't leave home without it," I'd like a card that I can't leave home without.

    28. Re:NOT RIGHT by mad_dog3283 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think he's Unit 639622.

      --
      Reprise the theme song and roll the credits!
    29. Re:NOT RIGHT by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Dude if I could add more mod points I would. That was a classic "You made it milk come out of my nose" moment.

      Thank You for a good laugh on an otherwise boring day (Day before Thanksgiving, I think every single user I take care of is either on vacation or sleeping in the cubicle. I haven't had a call all day)

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    30. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Couldn't you just read out the number, put it into another RFID, have it implanted into yourself, and bingo? Identity theft?

      For this to really work at all, it has to implement some sort of challenge/response algorithm.

    31. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carry cash you dork. Cash Walks Cash Talks. Don't eat from vending machines like a brain dead transient. Ride a bike and be human and live and be more than a freakin stupid consumer with too many gadgets on his belt.

      I'd like to leave home and be without clueless dorks who assume that technology is going to make their life better than their parents despite evidence to the contrary.

    32. Re:NOT RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      better not call them male and female connectors. you might offend somebody from LA.

    33. Re:NOT RIGHT by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      But seriously though, why don't we all just have credit card size cards that require a pin to use...blah blah blah [insert good sercurity idea here]

      Because credit card fraud is on the decrease, in store credit card fraud is a small percentage of credit card fraud (over 85% is online fraud) and Visa/MC are happy to swallow credit card fraud themselves, as opposed to the costs involved in getting merchants to switch to a new system, which will be very expensive, and will potentially drive people away from Visa/MC.

    34. Re:NOT RIGHT by tambo · · Score: 1
      You paranoids really need to get over this deranged fear that RFID will somehow strip away your silly illusion of privacy. Nobody needs RFID to find out everything you do. These new technologies aren't about stripping away your humanity. It's all about making life easier for everyone, so that we can do more with our humanity.

      Yeah, but jeez, it makes it a whole lot easier to conduct complete identity theft if every bit of information, public or private, is tied to one ID. Not even social security numbers are that pervasive: cash is virtually untrackable.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    35. Re:NOT RIGHT by Vexar · · Score: 1
      I thought the American Express new "Blue" card had a chip in it, is that a smart card? My knowledge does not, on this topic, go beyond what the ads hinted at on TV.

      As for Costco, yes, that does seem like all it was, but I believe there may have been a PIN involved, or it was tied to your member card, etc. Only useful within the store as I recall. I have had no interest in it, since they have one of those "print the info" systems for their checks at the register. Just gotta read it and sign. If MC / Visa / Amex networks can be just brought down entirely, and all the accounts just communicate with a bank directly, I have to believe that saves the banks money from those check cards. The credit card companies do charge a merchant fee. But then, who would make more of those clever Capital One ads?

    36. Re:NOT RIGHT by Channard · · Score: 1

      You think the conspiracy is going by Slashdot numbers? We've had you all tagged and numbered way before this site was opened.

  2. No it will not by jackb_guppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is not any advanage to this unless you also believe that Home Land Secuirty is good for the country.

    1. Re:No it will not by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      Giving business and government the ability to track our location, movements, and associations 24/7 in exchange for the convenience of not having to carry credit cards seems like a pretty bad trade-off. On the other hand its just what John Ashcroft and his friends in the department of Fatherland Security are having wet dreams about.

    2. Re:No it will not by blackbear · · Score: 1

      I must agree. It will soon be a new tool for government to manage the willingly oppressed. Eventually becoming mandatory. Social Security, Medicare, and payroll withholding were all voluntary once. But this also turns the market into a human ranch.

      Whether for commerce or government, it has been the unholy grail of all tyrants (CEOs often make the best tyrants if given the power) to know everything about everyone. If your laziness propels you to have your credit card implanted, you place your trust in the hands of people who have no more interest in your wellbeing than I have for the cattle harvested for my dinner table. It is in my best interest that the herd flourish so that I have a steady supply of tasty steaks. But I would hardly call the cattle ranch a free society just because the animals can choose their own spot to graze.

    3. Re:No it will not by Catbeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I doubt Herr PolitzenFueher Ashcroft will have any chips planted in his body that the the Fatherland Security Department will find trackable. Nor his financial or demographic records. The Fatherland Security Act deems dissemination of such information, such as addresses or social security numbers of the Reich leaders as de facto terrorism with all the throw-your-ass-in-a-torture-chamber non-prison laws applying.

      I'm not exagerating. Remember about a month ago when some people started skywriting personal information about (Ashcroft?)to prove a point about privacy? They couldn't give a whole number because that would have violated the Fatherland Security Act and they would have been yanked from public life for thirty years.

      This is not funny.

    4. Re:No it will not by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

      I'm not laughing. The question is this: "Is anyone else listening?"

    5. Re:No it will not by thebruce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given so many people seem to be against this, as it stands right now it's still very far off...

      now if you believe the biblical account of the mark of the beast, according to the biblical account it's not a matter of choice that these are implemented. It won't be a "oh this is cool, I should get this" choice that people make. biblically it's the antichrist that requires people to get this. As you said (food for thought) what if everyone eventually believes that Home Land Security (in whatever form it may be in the future) IS essential? What if the leader at that time is 'forced' to make a decision, maybe due to continued terrorist threats or disasters, that homeland security must be increased to a mandatory advanced tracking system? What if something happens that eventually causes the masses to value this highly advanced tracking system for all citizens so only citizens have 'freedom' within the country?

      if you think about it, right now the chances of something like this being implemented on a wide scale are practically nil. Combine it with imminent threat, so it becomes the 'best choice' amidst other undesirable choices or risks, and it's got a good possibility...

      just food for thought... I'm not a conspiracy theorist :)

    6. Re:No it will not by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      It was more of a plaintive sigh. Not meant to slight you, or insinuate you were laughing. Sorry.

    7. Re:No it will not by blackbear · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think people should stop personalizing this to John Ashcroft. It's not just him, or this administration. It's our entire corrupt government. Get rid of Ashcroft and they replace him with an idealogical clone. Elect a Democrat president and they replace him with an Democrat idealogical clone.

      As long as we continue to allow our government to swill from the keg-o-power, it will continue to encroach on freedom and maintain a life of its own. This is historically axiomatic. America will eventually become tyranical if the people don't act to stop it before they loose that power completly.

      It's no accident (though perhaps coincidence) that someone is developing a way to use RFIDs for commerce. It is money that is the source of all governmental power. When someone takes your money and gives nothing, they are taking away the time you spent earning it. Money is very much more important than people seem to understand, and in a society that is wealthy enough that even the poorest often have enough to buy luxuries, few seem to understand that taking it from you is not diferent than going into your pantry and taking the food from your shelves, or taking the tools from your shed, workbench, or desk.

    8. Re:No it will not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a conspiracy theorist, and all the government has to do is stage/allow another terrorist attack, but bigger, to get almost full support from all the "patriots" in the US.

    9. Re:No it will not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking moron socialist bastard communist
      dickhead. This has NOTHING to do with Ashcroft!
      Get over it. You lost, and will continue to do
      so because people are sick of your divisive shit.
      If you hate it here so damn much, loser, go to
      Cuba, China or any other red country. I only
      wish I had mod points right now. OH BOY! :^)

      I bet you didn't have ANY problem with Hillary's
      Socialist healthcare card, did you, you fucking
      hypocrite!

      And no, I ain't getting a chip! Or a card!

    10. Re:No it will not by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

      There is a reason an Anonymous Coward doesn't have mod points. Put your name on this or shut up, or I guess you really are an anonymous coward.

      --
      Think global, act loco
  3. Why not retina scans by upside · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is this better than biometrics?

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    1. Re:Why not retina scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the chip gets compromised you can replace it. You can't do that with biometrics.

    2. Re:Why not retina scans by rhs98 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      At least you can remove it, where as biometrics are kinda permanent...

    3. Re:Why not retina scans by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Outside of being able to use it via proxy, For Example, you stand in front of a vending machine, press a button and the pop comes out instead of having to look in or touch something, there is no real advantage.

      In fact its less secure that biometrics. It can be scanned for it's ID and then retransmitted, it can be stolen,(OW!) and if your account is compromised, time to call the doctor.

    4. Re:Why not retina scans by leerpm · · Score: 1

      You can replace an RFID with a new one. Hard to replace your retinas though. Think of it as a smaller credit card, but instead of carrying it in your wallet, it is embedded.

      Personally, I wouldn't want to deal with the hassle of embedding. I think a smart approach would just be a small versatile chip that you could place on your watchband, a bracelet, or cellpone (whichever your prefer).

      It would just be a new identifer number to match to you. How many bits are an RFID anyways?

    5. Re:Why not retina scans by aheath · · Score: 5, Interesting
      An implanted RFID chip is not better than biometrics. It is an alternative to biometrics that has some of the same security concerns as biometrics. There is no reason why a determined thief would prefer to remove an implanted RFID chip instead of removing an eyeball, a finger or a hand.

      I think that any biometric or RFID authentication technology should be combined with a PIN. It's just common sense to combine a secuity token that you posses with a PIN that you must memorize. This doesn't lead to perfect security, but it wraps the physical posession of an authentication token in another layer of security.

      The best argument that I can see for requiring a PIN is the ability to assign a "duress PIN" to users. A duress pin enables the security token holder to signal their distress when they are being forced to use their PIN under duress. For example, if someone held up at gunpoint and forced to use an ATM, they can enter the duress PIN. Use of the duress pin would signal the bank to notify the authorities that a robbery is in progress at a particular location. In a computer security environment, a duress PIN could be used to provide access to a honeypot network instead of the production network.

    6. Re:Why not retina scans by Fembot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about people who have more than one credit/debit card?? Will that become an impossible thing of the past?

    7. Re:Why not retina scans by mr100percent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but biometrics are harder to forge, so you wouldn't need to replace it.

    8. Re:Why not retina scans by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Is it just plain sad that I've never thought of that, nor have I ever heard of that? It's a novel idea.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    9. Re:Why not retina scans by arivanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So now instead of handing a bloke with a gun my wallet I will have to hand in my hand to be cut off. No, thanks. Not smoking that one.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    10. Re:Why not retina scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Biometrics" are just a way of generating a big number that gets stored in a database somewhere. Suppose that database gets compromised and the number is stolen. If it were a credit card database, you'd just cancel the card and issue a new one. How are you going to cancel my retina and issue a new one? Meanwhile the database cracker is using that number in any system he likes.

    11. Re:Why not retina scans by DZign · · Score: 1

      but biometrics are harder to forge

      while biometrics themselves are harder to forge, the tool which reads them may be compromised/replaced/.. so unless there's a lot of authentication, this is very vulnerable to a man in the middle attack/sniffing/..
      Just read the output of a retina scan and replay it at another machine...

      If biometrics really get used everywhere, its security system will eventually get cracked and then you've got a major problem.. cause you can't
      re-issue new retinas :-)

    12. Re:Why not retina scans by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      i believe many security systems for homes and businesses have something like this. atleast ones that i use have.

      the idea is that if someone forces you to enter your code you can use the duress code and it sets off the silent alarm.

    13. Re:Why not retina scans by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      At least you can remove it, where as biometrics are kinda permanent...

      Yes, you can. And there will be a cottage industry of involuntary removals - with rusty switchblades.

      Geez. Can't be stolen, my ass. Lends a new meaning to "slash and grab".

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Why not retina scans by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Is it just plain sad that I've never thought of that, nor have I ever heard of that?

      It's used by the company that monitors the alarm at the community center where I teach karate.

      If the alarm goes off, they call on the phone. I can give them the regular password to tell them it was a false alarm, or a different one to say "Help! Some maniac is here pointing a gun at me!"

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    15. Re:Why not retina scans by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I love the illogic of the companies selling these embeddable chips as deterrants to potential kidnappers of children.

      What do ya think the first order of business is when they get a victim? Locate the chip.

      Second? Cut it out of the kid.

      Of course, the next step will be deep embedding of the chip next to the stomach or something.

      The bad people will still cut them out. That's why they are called bad people.

      THINK, America!

    16. Re:Why not retina scans by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      -There is no reason why a determined thief would prefer to remove an implanted RFID chip instead of removing an eyeball, a finger or a hand.-

      Oh, please. A determined theif would just put a knife against your ribs at the ATM machine and say: Give me five hundred bucks or I'll stick you.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    17. Re:Why not retina scans by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. If you add a PIN to your tag tehy will not only need to remove your tag but also to remove your BRAIN in order to get your PIN.

      Haven't you heard of all the brain muggings going on with credit cards using PINS?

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    18. Re:Why not retina scans by tommck · · Score: 2, Informative
      There is no reason why a determined thief would prefer to remove an implanted RFID chip instead of removing an eyeball, a finger or a hand.

      Well, actually, many of the biometric devices out there can detect that a finger or hand or eyeball was removed from the body or is not alive. Many work on pulse detection, amongst other things.
      So, biometrics is more secure than a chip, unless it's got a blood pressure monitor built in or something.

      T

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    19. Re:Why not retina scans by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      And, I would assume, still operate visibly in a normal way. I know that's used on home alarms, but the thought of applying that to bank/credit cards never crossed my mind, which makes me feel pretty stupid.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    20. Re:Why not retina scans by pmz · · Score: 1

      What about people who have more than one credit/debit card??

      Just imagine a person who is really into body piercings. I'd say your eyebrow is good for at least a dozen credit accounts.

    21. Re:Why not retina scans by I8TheWorm · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not trying to be a karma whore here, but wouldn't it be a fairly silly idea to try to rob a place where self defense and hand/foot to head combat is taught?

      To me that sounds like trying to break into a prison.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    22. Re:Why not retina scans by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      I'm not trying to be a karma whore here, but wouldn't it be a fairly silly idea to try to rob a place where self defense and hand/foot to head combat is taught?

      Yes. Mostly because martial arts teaching doesn't pay very well! :-) ("Ok Mr. Robber, I paid $20 dollars to rent the space tonight, had three students paying $5 each, so I can give you the -$5 I made tonight. If you'll just give me $5...")

      Seriously, though, I think the building alarm is mostly for vandal protection. There's no valuables or significant money there, maybe the daycare center's petty cash fund. The panic code for the monitoring company is just a standard feature.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    23. Re:Why not retina scans by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > The best argument that I can see for requiring a PIN is the ability to assign a "duress PIN" to users. A duress pin enables the security token holder to signal their distress when they are being forced to use their PIN under duress. For example, if someone held up at gunpoint and forced to use an ATM, they can enter the duress PIN. Use of the duress pin would signal the bank to notify the authorities that a robbery is in progress at a particular location. In a computer security environment, a duress PIN could be used to provide access to a honeypot network instead of the production network.

      Rant: Why the hell don't the damn banks do that now?

      Probably because most lusers won't undersstand and will enter their duress PIN instead of their regular PIN from time to time.

      Which really cheeses me off. Duress PINs and duress codes ("Hi Son, everything's fine, is your dog Rover OK?" - when Mom and I, but not Home Invader Tyrone, know that I've never owned a dog named Rover) are simple and undetectable-to-the-adversary methods anyone can use to increase their own level of personal security.

    24. Re:Why not retina scans by cicho · · Score: 1

      Biometrics are not necessarily hard to forge. This guy duplicated fingerprints and created dummy fingers - 20 of them for ten bucks, in 15 minutes:

      http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/inter es ting-people/200311/msg00095.html

      --
      "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    25. Re:Why not retina scans by delphin42 · · Score: 1

      > How is this better than biometrics?
      There seems to be a lot of confusion about what this technology is meant to do. In my opinion, there are two separate technologies that this device could be used for.

      Think of it this way: there are usernames and there are passwords. This technology could be either a universal username or a universal password. It should not be both. What do I mean by this? When you purchase with a credit card you provide a username and a password. The user name is the credit card number. The password is your signature. The credit card number is meant to identify your account. The password is meant to certify your approval of the charge and provide a means for verification. If someone else steals your number, you can use the incorrect signature on false purchases to prove that you didn't make them. ATM cards/PINs work the same way.

      Now imagine you have an implated RFID. You could use this as your credit card. Instead of swiping the card, you scan your RFID chip. You still have to sign for the purchase. Someone with a duplicated RFID tag still doen't have your signature. So you could replace the credit card with this device and you wouldn't have to carry around a wallet anymore. The RFID could be a credit card, ATM card, drivers license, sams membership card, etc. There is no end to the number of functions it could serve. Every business buys a scanner and sets up a database and uses my unique ID to identify me so that I don't have to remember account numbers or carry a card.

      But wait, you could also keep the credit card and get rid of the signature. Instead of signing a document you scan your RFID. This seems like a weaker application for this technolgy. The only benefit is if the RFID tag is harder to forge than a signature. This is where biometrics has enormous possibility. It is harder to defeat than a signature, RFIT, or a pin.

      Why not both, seems to be a better question. If I scan my hand to retrieve my account number, and then use biometrics to verify my identity, theft is virtually impossible. Someone would have to fake my RFID chip AND fool a biometric scanner into thinking they have my retinal pattern, finger prints, etc.

      --
      -- Adam
    26. Re:Why not retina scans by kill+-9+$$ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I knew somebody had to bring this up. Somebody should mod the parent up.

      This was my exact thoughts. Its one track thinking, "well now they can't take your credit cards and or money because there's no money to take because of the chip". At that point (chip == money/credit cards). Have the chip, or the value stored on the chip, you effectively have the money. And if I were a robber, I'm going to take the smash (or slice in this case) and grab approach and worry about deciphering/using the chip later.

      An to those who say, well the chip might have smarts to not work in a dead hand and/or you can report it as stolen, I'll still lose my hand, because many criminals are dumb and wouldn't understand that concept until after my hand is missing.

      --

      -- A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard
    27. Re:Why not retina scans by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      And how is this different from RFID clones?

      I walk down the street with a RFID scanner, scanning a hundred, a thousand people. I then scam two or three hundred ID's to sell on the black market. Now all those people have to go have operations or have their RFID chips reprogrammed.

      Biometrics has the ability, in the least, of giving the buyer some assurance of accountability. That restaurant down the street stealing retinal scans leaves a paper trail of owners and employees.

      The guy walking through a crowded subway with a walkman that's really a RFID reader in disguise gets away with almost unaccountably...

    28. Re:Why not retina scans by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      while biometrics themselves are harder to forge, the tool which reads them may be compromised/replaced/.. so unless there's a lot of authentication, this is very vulnerable to a man in the middle attack/sniffing/..

      And that doesn't apply to RFID tags how?

      Just read the output of a retina scan and replay it at another machine...

      The question is, is it harder to reproduce a fake retina, fake cash, or a fake credit card?

      If biometrics really get used everywhere, its security system will eventually get cracked and then you've got a major problem.. cause you can't re-issue new retinas :-)

      You're assuming that reading a biometric is as easy as copying a biometric. That's clearly not the case. We use biometrics all the time, after all. That's how we recognize people. Just because I can describe a person in great detail doesn't mean I can make an exact replica of him.

      But what if the input gets cracked, you ask? Think about an ATM machine. If I can manage to get past the glass and rewire the retinal scanner then I could probably just break in and get the cash itself.

    29. Re:Why not retina scans by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      I think that any biometric or RFID authentication technology should be combined with a PIN. It's just common sense to combine a secuity token that you posses with a PIN that you must memorize. This doesn't lead to perfect security, but it wraps the physical posession of an authentication token in another layer of security.

      Unfortunately, the trend seems to be removing layers of security for financial transactions to make them seem more convenient, rather than doing anything to make them secure. When I'm using my Visa card, few merchants care about ID, especially for purchases under $100, and I don't even remember the last time one checked the signature. Really instills me with confidence that they're doing their part to keep the system safe from theft and fraud.

    30. Re:Why not retina scans by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?!?!?!??!

      When it's so much easier to just walk past 10,000 people with a RFID reader, steal 10,000 accounts, run them all through crack, and end up with some good accounts?

      Because you KNOW there are morons out there who use 1111, 1234 or 5555 as PIN numbers.

      And you don't have to worry about washing the blood out...

    31. Re:Why not retina scans by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      And I'd say to 'em: Stick me. You're on candid camera... :-) Unless he had a mask. Then I'd grab my 9mm and offer him a hasty retreat.

    32. Re:Why not retina scans by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I think that any biometric or RFID authentication technology should be combined with a PIN.

      The best security is a combination of something you have (that's difficult to reproduce, RFIDs don't cut it), something you know, and something you are. But not every application needs to use all three of these things. We already use RFID authentiation for paying tolls using EZ-Pass, and paying for gas using EZ-Pay or whatever the hell it's called. Has anyone ever stolen money using these things? Probably, but the usefulness is so little that it's really not worth the time to reproduce the item and the risk of getting caught. A successful operation and you get some free gas, or free tolls. Working alone you aren't going to gain very much at all, and working as part of a large conspiracy you could come up with a lot more lucrative ways to steal or even earn money.

    33. Re:Why not retina scans by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      I hope so, it would cut down on bankruptcy and encourage people to spend only money they actually have.

    34. Re:Why not retina scans by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      When you purchase with a credit card you provide a username and a password. The user name is the credit card number. The password is your signature.

      About 90% of my credit card purchases don't require a signature. Gas stations, grocery stores (at the self-serve checkout line), online purchases. None of these require signatures.

      But in any case, you haven't shown how this is any better than biometrics. The only difference is you could potentially replace it. But that seems to me to be more of a detriment than an advantage. Otherwise, why bother embedding the RFID? I guess for some people that's supposed to be convenient. I'd just as well put it on my keychain, though, even if we get to the point where there are no keys.

      Why not both, seems to be a better question. If I scan my hand to retrieve my account number, and then use biometrics to verify my identity, theft is virtually impossible.

      How is that any more secure than just using biometrics? More efficient, perhaps (it's currently hard to use biometrics for identification when you have a large population of data). But I don't see how it's any more secure. Anyone who can steal your biometric data can just steal your RFID data at the same time.

    35. Re:Why not retina scans by darien · · Score: 1

      He can't walk into a shop and use that number. Not without extremely implausible optical surgery. That's the whole point of biometrics. And naturally any sort of transaction which doesn't involve the customer's physical presence will need additional security, just as happens now with credit cards.

    36. Re:Why not retina scans by elton247 · · Score: 1

      Thats a great idea! Why the hell don't we have those now?

      --
      How strange it is to be anything at all
    37. Re:Why not retina scans by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      There is no reason why a determined thief would prefer to remove an implanted RFID chip instead of removing an eyeball, a finger or a hand.

      dont need to. All I need to do is emulate it. I can go around collecting the responses from rfid tags and simply create a device to overpower my rfid tag's signal with the recorded/emulated signal of your rfid tag and simply spend your money or avoid the officer from nabbing me as I leave.

      anyone who has messed with rfid type of devices (mobil speedpass or security prox-cards) knows that they are easily spoofed with the right gear and software...

      my Sharp zaurus with a serial cable has enough processing power to do what I need to spoof that type of system with the right hardware that can be built or bought.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    38. Re:Why not retina scans by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not trying to be a karma whore here, but wouldn't it be a fairly silly idea to try to rob a place where self defense and hand/foot to head combat is taught?

      When I was a kid, our karate instructor had one of his assistants dress up like a 1970's TV burglar and sneak into the backdoor. We had no idea who it was, but when he told us to "get him" we did.

      At the end of the day, I had to apologize to Mr. Castro for kicking him in the nuts, twice. Believe me, I did it as hard as I could.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    39. Re:Why not retina scans by Fembot · · Score: 1

      I have more than one debit card, and NO overdraft on any of them, and they're all totaly legitimate... I would be pretty pissed off if I have to move all my debit cards to one account. (Incase you dont realise with debit cards you can only spend what you have + overdraft if you ask the bank for one)

    40. Re:Why not retina scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't wanna go blind

    41. Re:Why not retina scans by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      Because there are some morons who dont realize they can do that.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
    42. Re:Why not retina scans by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Haha! If I had any mod points you'd get a +1 Funny on that!

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    43. Re:Why not retina scans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you don't need to worry about losing your hand. The criminals know perfectly well that you would immediately cancel the tag and they would be pegged for assault with a deadly weapon. Their only choice is to kill you to keep you silent, then dig the tag out of your corpse. Losing your hand is the least of your worries.

    44. Re:Why not retina scans by keriaan · · Score: 1

      The above link does not go to the aforementioned article. Try this link instead.

    45. Re:Why not retina scans by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      You are right about this. RFID in it's current form is DUMB.

      But a more sophisticated form could come about that has public key challenge/response mechanisms. In this case stealing the original would be absoluetly necessary.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    46. Re:Why not retina scans by eam · · Score: 1

      Speaking only for myself, I'd rather have the thieves be able to steal my wallet rather than forcing them to cut off my arm (or whatever other part this thing is implanted in).

  4. I only hope... by jkrise · · Score: 0, Funny

    Microsoft doesn't get to make these 'implants'. The Service Packs, bug fixes and anti-virus updates would kill me!

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:I only hope... by Plasmagrid · · Score: 1

      let MS make it then it would break and you couldn't be tracked.....LOL

  5. You Could Make It Fun.. by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Have them implant the chip in your middle finger.

    You can flip people off and then say, "No, I wasn't giving you the bird, I was buying a Coke."

    1. Re:You Could Make It Fun.. by GTRacer · · Score: 1, Funny
      At Universal Islands o' Adventure, they recently upgraded their free locker rental kiosks with fingerprint scanners so they don't have to print out all those "PIN receipts".

      When I went up to one to stash my junk to ride the Hulk, I used my middle finger. The crowd behind me laughed, but the machine got the last laugh as it wouldn't unlock again, no matter how many times I flipped it off.

      GTRacer
      - Technology with a Human touch

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  6. who will be the first person to have their arm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    removed by thieves to get the RFID?

  7. Speedpass by rhs98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its kinda like the card in HongKong called octopus - http://www.mtr.com.hk/eng/train/octopus.html Which is used on the MTR and in shops and busses. Its great and a neat idea - you just wave your walet over the reader and thats it.

    1. Re:Speedpass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then somebody nicks your card and buys a nuclear warhead, or let's say three.

  8. Mark of the Beast ? by ultranova · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It does certainly bear similarities to said mark... I seem to recall that one had to had the mark to be able to buy goods.

    Anyway, whether it's the mark of the beast or not, I'm not going to put such a chip on my body.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by leerpm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure everyone in the thread is going to get this joke. I believe the author is refering to the former German currency, called the mark. Though it has since been replaced by the Euro.

    2. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by HorrorIsland · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the joke's on you. Revelations 13, verses 16 and 17 say...

      Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

      Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

      Of course, it goes on from there. Now at least you know...

    3. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by azzy · · Score: 1

      Fine, easy. We put it in the left hand, or the foot. I like the idea of kicking people to pay them.

    4. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      Yes, this does bear a similarity to the Biblical reference to the mark of the beast.

      The mark will be in/on the right hand or the forehead and no one will be able to buy or sell without it. Anyone taking the mark will be consciously pledging allegiance to the anti-Christ and will have subsequently and irreversably chosen their destination after death.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    5. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1, Troll

      No, the joke's on you! I'M Mark and what I do with my right hand is nothing you want to know about!

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    6. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by AlecC · · Score: 0, Troll

      And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

      The number of his name - that's your credit card number, above your name, right? The "name of the beast" - some formm of recognised ID with a corporate/government name on it? Sorry, fundies, you're too late - its already happened. Any attempt at a cashless society would appear to trigger this verse.

      So fundamentalists should abhor all banking and inist on cash transactions only (which avoids the usury the bible goes on about as well). In fact, notes have serial numbers and the "name of the beast" - the government - on them. So coins only. Cpuld make life difficult in this modern world.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    7. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 1

      Of course those things aren't on your forehead or hand... yet.

    8. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The number of his name - that's your credit card number, above your name, right? The "name of the beast" - some formm of recognised ID with a corporate/government name on it? Sorry, fundies, you're too late - its already happened. Any attempt at a cashless society would appear to trigger this verse.

      The Bible continues to say that the number of his (the anti-Christ) name is 666. I don't think it's the credit card number above your name.

      So fundamentalists should abhor all banking and inist on cash transactions only (which avoids the usury the bible goes on about as well). In fact, notes have serial numbers and the "name of the beast" - the government - on them. So coins only. Cpuld make life difficult in this modern world.

      Those who accept the mark will KNOWINGLY be pledging allegiance to the anti-Christ. I personally have nothing against technological advances. Believe me, though: no one will be fooled into taking the mark. All who take it will know to whom their allegiance lies.

      which avoids the usury the bible goes on about as well

      There's no point to forcing a cash-only society. The future has already been written. It's just a matter of time before it comes to pass.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    9. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "I seem to recall that one had to had the mark to be able to buy goods."

      Buy or sell goods, but John's Apocrypha was a bit loose on specifics and has fuelled a lot of speculation since because it presents an interesting eschatological omega point for those that think the world is ending. Personally I think the human race will continue being assholes to each other for a very long time yet.

      I'm with you, though, for extremely sound reasons. Firstly I'm getting out of the credit game as soon as I can. I'm fed up of being charged money for weakening into consumption of crap, or being tied to a financial institution that encourages it.

      Can you imagine a situation where changing a credit agency would require surgery?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    10. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The future has already been written. It's just a matter of time before it comes to pass.

      how dismal a prophecy...and so since the future is already written, and i can't change it, so then why bother doing anything at all?

    11. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mark of the beast is not a chip like many people think. It is deception and this story is just part of it. [url]http://www.biblestudygames.com/biblestudies/m arkofthebeast.htm[/url]

    12. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Uh, guys? Revelations was a metaphor for the fall of Rome. Seven hills, etc. Rome and its evil sway over the land of Israel was all the Jews cared about back in the first century.

      Since to write about the fall of Rome was a one-way ticket to death by torture, political writings were dressed in metaphorical language that couldn't easily be read as traitorous. John of course mixed his religion with politics, but I don't think he meant it to be read like the writings of Nostradamus. Hell, Revelations almost didn't make the cut into the New Testament.

    13. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      The name of the book is Revelation, not Revelations.

      Now you know.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      -And second, if you don't beleive in satan, how do you pledge your allegiance to him?-

      A common misconception. It's not pledging allegience to satan, it's the wilful rejection of Christ. The term anti-Christ means against Christ. There have been many anti-Christs throughout history. The anti-Christ (drumroll, please) is simply the biggest, baddest, most seductive and nastiest of the lot.

      You will not be pledging alliegience to satan, per se, you will be openly and defiantly rejecting Christ, which will actually probably be a very easy thing to do for many slashdotters, since they already have a lot of practice at it.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    15. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is the link: Mark of the Beast

    16. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by pmz · · Score: 1

      Pay your credit card off every month.

      What is so terribly sad is that many people don't do this. They'd rather live on borrowed money and face the consequences later. It's irresponsible. It's pathetic. Quite honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if it leads to another Great Depression.

    17. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Greed of things unhad is the root of all evil - it's what led for Satan to be cast from heaven.

      Money is often aquired through greed. Those that take the mark are those that will have willingly accepted the worldwide trade organization, and it's method of business. Likely, all but the top will have been demoted to utter wage slaves by then - it'll be a life of subsistance, and they'll have little choice...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Ozric · · Score: 1

      it's too late already .... everyone knows that the 'mark of the beast' is a cell phone.

    19. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rather fancy the joke is you for wasting time on the useless, fictional nonsense that is Chrstianity. It's about as much use as a book about Nostrodamus. Has a single prediction fortold in either that or the bible come true yet? Any day now, right?

    20. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
      Quite honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if it leads to another Great Depression.

      Me, neither. The deception of paper money (as opposed to hard currency) and easy credit - both of which are easily manipulated by those in positions of power - is what was responsible for the first one. If you get the chance, find a copy of Remarkable Remedy (ISBN 0962899321) by Jean Carpenter. I couldn't find it at B&N, but did at LFOD.

    21. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      Uh, guys? Revelations was a metaphor for the fall of Rome. Seven hills, etc. Rome and its evil sway over the land of Israel was all the Jews cared about back in the first century. Since to write about the fall of Rome was a one-way ticket to death by torture, political writings were dressed in metaphorical language that couldn't easily be read as traitorous. John of course mixed his religion with politics, but I don't think he meant it to be read like the writings of Nostradamus. Hell, Revelations almost didn't make the cut into the New Testament. It was? Since when did Christ return to earth and start a 1,000 year period of peace, throw the anti-Christ, Satan and the unbelievers into the Lake of Fire? My money is still on Revelations being future-telling. The second coming is, well, coming...

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    22. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe it is about destruction of Israel. A lot of what is said there ties into historical records of the event. I have also heard that by using an ancient hebrew method for finding numbers based on words, "Nero" produces 666.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    23. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1



      Excellent - now we have allies in our war against the privacy invaders.

      Let's see if the United Geeks and God Botherers can derail the 'Security' juggernaut.

      If you really want to find ways around this, for those who choose to fight. Try this

      It's time mankind grew out of prophecies.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    24. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by akaina · · Score: 1

      That would be a fine theory except for the fact that most early Christians were non-Jews - including the 6/7 churches that Revelation mentions.

      Jesus was a Jew and John 1:11 says
      "He came unto His own, but His own recieved him not."

      --
      Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
    25. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Cheesemaker · · Score: 1

      Bingo! As a minister's son who had to grow up around a lot of nutcases (along with some of the nicest people you'll ever meet), Revelation (and also Leviticus) was one of the most misinterpreted and over-analyzed books I had to hear about. People spend more time agonizing over the end of the world, rather than just be good to others.

    26. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      Sounds exactly like those guys' business plan, does not it?
      Or at least, this can be claimed as "prior art" :-)

    27. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Has a single prediction fortold in either that or the bible come true yet? Actually, the Bible foretold of the coming of the Savior in the Old Testament. The Savior did arrive in the form of Jesus Christ. Hence, we have the new testament.

      The Bible foretold of the flood. It happened and Noah and his family were saved to repopulate the world.

      The Bible foretold of the resurrection of Christ after three days. This, too, came to pass.

      Nostradamus was a false prophet as is anyone who makes a prediction that does not come to pass.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    28. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100,000 to be implanted in the hand. That way all the peasants can have it in their foreheads and thus BOW to the bank/interac machines whenever they buy something.

    29. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by tgv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did this get a +2 score? The savior never arrived, I'm sorry to tell you. And the flood never happened. And it wasn't foretold neither; it was history by the time the bible was written. And about the resurrection? Appealing and powerful tale, but as true as the rest of the bible.

    30. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Hadji · · Score: 1

      The fall of Jerusalem was foretold about 40 years before it happened. The reformation of Israel was foretold a couple thousand years before it happened.

      There is enough scientific evidence to prove, at the very least, an ancient flood in Mesopotamia. Many many people (secular as well as Christian) believe this may be the flood on which the story of Noah is most likely based. If such is indeed the case, then the flood was foretold, and came to pass. (If it wasn't foretold, how did he know to build a boat?)

    31. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by troon · · Score: 1

      And you're suddenly the world expert on the historical validity of Jesus, are you? OK, I accept that you might not believe he is your saviour (and therefore you're right), but I doubt you'll find many serious historians that will claim that the Jesus of the Gospels didn't exist in pretty much the way the Bible portrays him.

      Now read the book of Isaiah and compare the likenesses. Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection fulfilled hundreds of OT prophecies, which we know predate the event thanks to the Dead Sea Scrolls.

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    32. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      Let's see: The Bible predicts that a mark will be needed to buy or sell. It was predicted almost 2000 years ago. There were no computers or electronics then. There was no means to buy or sell via a mark. Now we are a few years away from this being common place. True the whole prophecy is not fulfilled, but the fulfillment is currently happening. That makes it a little hard to ignore. The Bible predicted that the world would become as Sodom and Gomorah before the end times. Sodom and Gomorah was known as very sinful cities. The men desired other men and the women desired other women. This is clearly coming true now. Homosexuals are becoming more prevalent and Homosexuality will become a legitamate way of life. The Bible predicted the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple. Guess what? There are plans by the Israelis to rebuild the temple. Why do you think there are so many problems between Palestinians and Israelis? Because a Muslim mosque is placed where the Temple is to be rebuilt. Mark my words, the mosque will be destroyed. The Bible predicts the rebuilding of Babylon. Guess what? Before Sadam was ousted Babylon was being rebuilt including the hanging gardens. Need more?

    33. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate? Where did your "revalation" come from?

    34. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      A "Mark on their right hand" or "in their forheads" is an allegorecal reference to "things you do" or "things you think". It's not necessarily literally a physical mark.

      It's reasonably common in Judaic literature of that time period.

      Most REAL biblical scholars do not believe this refers to an acutal physical mark, but instead, to some sort of compulsion of behavior or thought.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    35. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      " Greed of things unhad is the root of all evil - it's what led for Satan to be cast from heaven."

      No - it was PRIDE and ARROGANCE that led Satan to be cast from heaven.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    36. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't blame you. Personally why would anyone have surgery if they didn't need it? Sure, liposuction and plastic surgery but this? I had surgery years ago to remove a growth and it was VERY unpleasant.

      "Applied Digital officials say such concern is unfounded because people are chipped voluntarily."

      Not to troll here but think about it. Today it's valuntary but what about tomorrow? As with most things in the Government we find that temporary things become permanent. I wouldn't be surprised if this became a requirement in the future.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    37. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by germinatoras · · Score: 1

      Certainly those people are hurting the economy. Think about all those wasted dollars! Those people could have started a 401(k) or mutual fund for themselves, but instead they bought a big ghetto-blaster and a Lexus, both of which will be worthless long before they're paid for.
      I shake my head in disbelief at the situation. (and the corporations who make cash loans so easy to obtain are party to blame)

    38. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      The fall of Jerusalem was foretold about 40 years before it happened. The reformation of Israel was foretold a couple thousand years before it happened.

      Does that mean Harry Seldon was a Qabbalist?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    39. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      This is clearly coming true now. Homosexuals are becoming more prevalent and Homosexuality will become a legitamate way of life

      Okay flamebaiter, I'll bite.

      No matter how prevalent or legitimate Homosexuality becomes - I'll NEVER desire other men. Just ain't ever gonna happen. So that's clearly very flawed logic your spouting. My main disagreement with that, is a LOT of Bible-believers agree with this, and take it a step further - believing that if they just outlaw homosexuality, they can somehow stop the coming of the end-times. To me, that makes about as much sense as a fish with a bicycle. Showing God that you're willing to hate his children, and embracing intolerance and violence isn't what I'd call a smart idea. Using flawed logic to support those actions is even sillier.

      Guess what? If the prophesied End Times are coming, or if they're not, do you think it's wise to even try to stop it? You ought to worry about your OWN soul. Stop worrying about everyone else's. And THAT, my friend, has PLENTY of scripture to back it up. Because Guess What? If you can't forgive, you won't be forgiven.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    40. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      Most REAL biblical scholars do not believe this refers to an acutal physical mark, but instead, to some sort of compulsion of behavior or thought.

      Can you give me a few of their names? All of the Bible scholars I've ever read have viewed this as a physical mark. Then again, I could say that any REAL Biblical scholar would interpret the Bible literally, not metaphorically.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    41. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      That web page is hooey.

      The Bible speaks of a beast SEPARATE from Satan in Revelation. How can the beast be Satan when they are two separate people?

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    42. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by cosmol · · Score: 1

      All the "proof" that those things actually happened comes from the same source that predicted that they would happen in the first place. Surely you can see the problem with your assertion.

    43. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Jesus spoke in parables correct? Why assume the almighty would do any different?

      Not trying to start a fight, just asking a serious question.

      Finkployd

    44. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He never said anything about hating homosexuals, or stopping the end times from coming, only that they were coming.

    45. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      I was not refering to all men. But it is clear that the Homosexual group has an agenda to push their "values" on every one else. It is clear that it is becoming acceptable in society. No there is no way to stop the rapture or even delay it. For only God the Father knows when that time is. That time does not change based on the course of human events. But that still does not mean we should not try to stem the tide of the homosexual community. Just because we can't stop man from destroying himself doesn't mean we should fold over and except it. Rather as Jesus did, we need to try to help those who are seeking help. Even if the world is lost, we can still reach the individuals

    46. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      But it is clear that the Homosexual group has an agenda to push their "values" on every one else. It is clear that it is becoming acceptable in society.

      WHO has an agenda to push their "values" on every one else?

      I only see the homosexual "agenda" as being:
      Leave me alone and let me live my life the way I want to.
      The Christian fundamentalist/evangelical "agenda" seems to be:
      End the sinfulness in your lives or we'll end your lives for you.

      Who gives a crap if gay people want to be left alone and treated as equals? They don't want to join your "club" - and they don't care if you or anyone else joins theirs. Other people's sex lives are none of your business! That's the homosexual "agenda". If you don't want to be Gay, then don't be Gay. If someone else wants to be Gay, then let them. Any person's "agenda" should only concern their own affairs. Not other's affairs.
      If it's becoming acceptable in society - what concern is that of yours? All you need worry about is if YOU find it acceptable in YOUR LIFE. It's not about society. It's about YOUR personal relationship with your Creator.

      But that still does not mean we should not try to stem the tide of the homosexual community. Just because we can't stop man from destroying himself doesn't mean we should fold over and except it. Rather as Jesus did, we need to try to help those who are seeking help. Even if the world is lost, we can still reach the individuals

      Sure, I remember reading lots of passages of Jesus going around saying that God Hates Fags. I especially love the ones where Jesus beats the crap out of this one bulldike and tells her "I love you, and I'm going to be crucified for your sins, so stop sinning you evil lesbian." and his great sermon in Jerusalem. . . "go forth then into the world, and seek out the pillow-biters, for they are evil in my sight. It is up to you, believers, to prove to me that you love me - punish them for me by denying their rights and teasing them, and beating them, because, of course, the Father is too feeble to cast a bolt of lighting upon their flesh if he really wanted to punish them."

      Passing laws is not 'helping those who are seeking help'. Passing laws is nothing more than getting off on a power trip. It goes against everything Jesus stood for, and the whole reason God sent Him in the first place.

      If your eye offends thee, pluck it the fuck out, and leave other people alone.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    47. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the Dead Sea Scrolls and Josephus (as well as other less known historians)--independent sources which validate both the prophecies and the historical evidence of their fulfillment.

    48. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      Alright how about this one. The Bible predicted that the Jewish people would be scattered throughout tht world. This happened at the end of the Roman Empire. Then in the end times, the Israelites would regather in large numbers back to the "promised land" (ancient Israel). In 1948 this came true when Israel was recognized as an independant nation. This happened as a result of various afflictions angainst Jews at the time. The Bible also predicted that the middle east would be a thorn in the world's side. This has been true since the Crusades. Then when things get real ugly the "Beast" will come and offer the world peace. But it will only last for a season. And no, not everyone that tries to bring peace to the middle east is the "Beast". But all others before him will fail. How many US Presidents have tried to bring peace to the middle east? There is a reason that they have failed. But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't try.

    49. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Has a single prediction fortold in either that or the bible come true yet? Any day now, right?"

      Jesus said he would return soon in power and glory to rule his new kingdom; so soon that the disciples should not marry.

      So the "second coming" was to occur before 100 ad at least.

      Jesus was a political revolutionary against the opppresive Roman occupiers; and killed for being such. Judas bribed the regular guards, but a centurian (unbribable) was put in charge, who stabbed Jesus in the side (not part of the plan) whereupon Jesus said "Why have you forsaken me Lord?" and died. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.

    50. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      Get a grip. No one, especially Jesus said that God hates gays. But the Bible and Jesus is very clear that the action of gays is wrong and defiling. It's called hate the sin, love the sinner. Does it bug you that Christians are the first to admit that they are sinners? Maybe you believe in self-righteousness, but then who is being arrogant, the Christian or the self-righteous?

      The gays agenda is to destroy marriages! If you can't see that then you must have your head in a hole. They don't want marriage. How many gays stay in the same relationship for over 7 years? Not many. Why is it that syphulis and HIV is rampant in gay communities? It's not because they only have one partner. I could careless if someone wanted to live their live as a gay, but when they intrude on my family that crosses the line. When I have to explain why two men or women are kissing on TV, I have to explain why. As for being gay in the genetics, how can you be a gay and your parents not if it is in the genes? How is it that gays can see their wrong and change their sexual preference? It happens you know. Can't be the genes that changed now can it. They are pushing their agenda and are destroying America as we know it. I refuse to have my kids grow up in that hostile type of climate.

      1 Corinthians 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.

      Matthew 15:19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies

    51. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, whoever has told you that the Bible condones people continuing in the practice of a homosexual lifestyle has sadly misled you. To clarify your question, there are at least four matter which the bible clearly affirms: 1. God loves all people. 2. God hates and condemns the sin of homosexuality. 3. Homosexuality is a choice, a sin we have chosen to commit. 4. In order to be saved, one must turn from this and from all sin.

      To answer your question, I will take these in the order listed above.

      1. God loves all people. God has shown His love for all, including all who have sinned, by providing us with all physical things. Further, as the ultimate proof of His love, He has provided the way by which we can be saved, thought the blood of Jesus.

      MAT 5:43 "You have heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor, and hate your enemy.'
      MAT 5:44 "But I say to you, love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you
      MAT 5:45 in order that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for He causes His sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.

      ROM 5:6 For while we were still helpless, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly.
      ROM 5:7 For one will hardly die for a righteous man; though perhaps for the good man someone would dare even to die.
      ROM 5:8 But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

      2. God hates and condemns the practice of homosexuality. Both in the Old Testament and the New, this is made clear in many passages. It is against the physical make-up of men and women and the purpose of marriage. Notice the following passages.

      LEV 20:13 'If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act; they shall surely be put to death. Their bloodguiltiness is upon them.

      ROM 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
      ROM 1:19 because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them.
      ROM 1:20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.
      ROM 1:21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God, or give thanks; but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
      ROM 1:22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,
      ROM 1:23 and exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed animals and crawling creatures.
      ROM 1:24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, that their bodies might be dishonored among them.
      ROM 1:25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

      3. Homosexuality is a choice, not brought about by necessity. The very nature of sin is, it is an act against the Law of God. Something that we choose to do and are deceived by. Although we may be convinced that we have no choice, this is a part of our deception and will prevent us from facing responsibility for our actions and recognizing our need to change, if we are to please God.

      1JOHN 3:4 Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness.

      JAM 1:13 Let no one say when he is tempted, "I am being tempted by God"; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone.
      JAM 1:14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust.
      JAM 1:15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.

      4. In order to be saved, we must turn from our sins, including homosexuality. This is clear from Paul's letter to the Corinthians where he

    52. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Speare · · Score: 1
      I don't usually get into metaphysical arguments about religion, but I'll bite. Take this as a gedankenexperiment only, please. I'm agnostic.

      If God is all-creator, then He created Satan.
      If God is all-knowing, then He knew what Satan would be.
      If God is all-capable, then He chose to create Satan the way He did.
      If God is all-supreme, then He created Hell and designed it for Satan.
      If God is all-perfect, then His plan for the world requires a fallen Satan.

      If Satan, Satan's fall, and Hell are requirements for the Universe to unfold in the way God intends, then everything Satan does is with God's blessing. I don't see how Satan's arrogance or pride is wrong, if his role in God's plan is as great as it seems by all stretch of religion. Fate itself is irrelevant, and choice is false.

      God created all possible choices I could make.
      God knows what choices I will make before I even know my choices.

      Perhaps choice is merely illusory: I make the choice, but the other course of action also exists as a different branch of possible universes. An infinite God could surely imagine and create all possible universes. But He still knows which choices I will make. A world with an all-knowing God is pre-ordained, with all fates sealed, by definition, so I have no choice.

      Therefore, if I ignore God in my day-to-day decision-making, am I being arrogant as was Satan? Or am I merely the puppet who has no choices to make? If I know I cannot really make choices, how can I be arrogant? Conversely, if I am given a real choice, and I think I have an important role to make good choices, how is having a sense of self-importance and a pride in my role in that plan a sin?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    53. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Dog135 · · Score: 0

      God knows what you will choose to do, but that doesn't take away your free will.

      If I leave my dinner on the coffee table to get something out of the kitchen, I know my dog will eat it. When he does, I punish him. By punishing him, he learns not to eat my dinner when I'm away.

      Sure I'm setting a trap for him, but it's needed in order to train him. It's still his own free will to eat the food, but he's very predictable. To God, we're very predictable.

      God created diversity. He also created free will. God wants people who will follow him of their own free will, and in order for that to happen, he needs to create evil for there to be a choice. Evil chooses to be evil, it's not a puppet of God's. No more then my dog is my puppet by eating my dinner like I thought he would.

      BTW: There's an old saying: "If God's so good, why do bad things happen to good people?" The answer: "God created free will and bad people choose to do bad things. If God protected the good people, he'd be taking away the free will of the bad people."

      --
      "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
    54. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

      isn't the name of that beast Citibank? or is it Capitol One?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    55. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So prove that he ever existed. Show some shred of tangible evidence that he walked on this earth. I'm no advocate for either side, but up to this point the entirety of Christianity is based on conjecture and hearsay - you call it faith. Until you can prove that the man physically existed, you cannot make claims that are at all factual. It is all theoretical at this point. Or, to be more precise, it is simply your form of mythology.

      And you think you can prove the bible by citing references to itself? Isn't that a little silly?

    56. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a fundamenalist christian bible thumper promoting a Beatles forum a little hypocritical? Whatever happened to secular art being originated from THE BEAST!

      And you hope anyone will take you seriously?

      Shit, at least with Scientology I get a free personality analysis.

    57. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by blackbear · · Score: 1

      Without getting religous in a technical discussion...

      The real challenge will be to function in a society that requires this. If your convictions are such that you cannot abide this or any other personally identifiable implant, as mine are. Then this would be the greatest and longest test of your beliefs, religious or otherwise, that you could possibly face. How many of us are willing to face expulsion from society, and the poverty and uncertianty that it will cause, in order to be true to your beliefs? How many will do it just to keep their children in school, or to keep themselves insured?

      I'm having a difficult enough time making money to pay my obscene tax levy without loosing contracts because some customers or emplyers want me to skirt the bounds of ethical propriety for them. I refuse, they fire me. Fine, it's a free market. Morality is expensive. I feel sorry for those who can't bear the cost. As well as those who think that it hasn't become that bad yet. They won't be ready when it hits them.

      Of course, I could just go along. But my instinct for survival prevents me.

    58. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have also heard that by using an ancient hebrew method for finding numbers based on words, "Nero" produces 666.

      Does this means I must now purchase Easy CD Creator from Roxio? ;)

    59. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Hadji · · Score: 1

      Harry Seldon was a pawn of Giskard! Death to the robots!!!

    60. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      The book of Revelation is not a book of prophecy but a social commentary of the persecution of Christians by Rome at the time it was written. It is full of codes and symbols in much the same manner that the secret societies of medieval Europe did to avoid persecution of the ruling powers.

      The Beast was Emperor Nero and the code for his name was 666.

      Of course people will see what they want to see. Look at how many people still think Elvis is alive!

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    61. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Speare · · Score: 1

      If I leave my dinner on the coffee table to get something out of the kitchen, I know my dog will eat it. When he does, I punish him. By punishing him, he learns not to eat my dinner when I'm away. Sure I'm setting a trap for him, but it's needed in order to train him. It's still his own free will to eat the food, but he's very predictable. To God, we're very predictable.

      But you see, I didn't create my dog. So of course he has free will which is independent of my plan. He might decide to eat, and he might decide not to eat. To me, his behavior is not 100% deterministic, but to God, everything I do is pre-ordained. Why? Because He designed me, He designed my world, and even the theory of chaos breaks down when discussing His ability to predict my outcomes.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    62. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by 0x12d3 · · Score: 1

      There's no point to forcing a cash-only society. The future has already been written. It's just a matter of time before it comes to pass.

      Judgement Day is inevitable

      - T101, Rise for the Machines.

    63. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by KanshuShintai · · Score: 1

      The Bible continues to say that the number of his (the anti-Christ) name is 666.

      Actually... it says that 666 is the number for the beast's name. Remember, Roman numbers are Latin letters. What better way to give warning to who the beast will be without causing a ruckus, than by giving the number of a person's name, instead of the acutal name that might be badly associated with someone in political power?

      Anyone know or want to find out what the numbers are for some terms one may find printed on a implant like this? Maybe G. W. Bush's name will provide an interesting find.

    64. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read it cover to cover and didn't see it then I think you are mentioned in the bible as well.

      Rev 13:18
      Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast; for it is the number of a man; and his number is six hundred threescore and six.

      since you lack understanding, let me help you.
      six huundred + 3 score ( 3 * 20 ) + 6 equals 666.

    65. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1
      The Bible also predicted that the middle east would be a thorn in the world's side. This has been true since the Crusades.

      Actually the Europeans where the thorn in the Middle East's side during the Crusades. The Crusades where all about the raping and pillaging of the Holy Lands to 'rescue' them from the 'heathens'. The story of those times are still told to the children of that culture to this day and are the source of much of their hatred of the west.

      The History Channel did a wonderful documentary about this misunderstood period of time hosted by Terry Jones. I highly recommend it.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    66. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Schemat1c · · Score: 2, Funny

      I found this on the Usenet a few years ago but I just love it and it applies so well to this idiot.
      --

      Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your site, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind then that Leviticus 18:22 clearly stated it to be an abomination to the Lord.

      I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how best to follow them.

      A) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord (Lev. 1:9). The problem is my neighbours: they claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

      B) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 2:17. In this day and age, what do you think a fair price for her would be?

      C) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness. (Lev. 15:19-24) The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.

      D) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. A friend of mine claims this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

      E) I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states that he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

      F) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination (Lev. 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

      G) Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of the Lord if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20 or is there some wiggle room here?

      H) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

      I) I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean. May I still play football if I wear gloves?

      J) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread. (It looks like some sort of cotton/poly blend.)

      He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev. 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev 20:14.)

      I know that you have studied these things extensively, so I'm confident that

      you can help. Thanks.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    67. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      "This is a gigantic step toward the mark of the beast, " said Gary Wohlscheid, whose website, These Last Days Ministries, keeps tabs on what many Christians believe are the signs of a coming religious Armageddon. His site is one of dozens that link VeriChip to the apocalyptic prophecy.

      Applied Digital officials say such concern is unfounded because people are chipped voluntarily.


      While I don't really believe the book of Revelations, I don't see any reason to push things. If someone were to take me onto a military base, and show me two keys which would supposedly launch a nuclear weapon, I wouldn't necessarily believe them, but I wouldn't feel inclined to try to prove them wrong by turning the keys either.

      The company's argument that the implant is voluntary is completely irrelevant. Many things start out as voluntary, then are phased to mandatory. While this isn't a perfect example, in America, taking a breathalyzer when you were pulled over used to be voluntary. As it stands now, most states will automatically suspend your license for a year if you refuse.

      I'm not religious, but I don't see any reason to test fate.

    68. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I found this on the Usenet a few years ago but I just love it and it applies so well to this idiot.

      So anyone who believes in something that can be neither proved nor disproved is an idiot? Or just the people whose beliefs conflict with yours? I must say though, I'm very much inclined to respect the opinions of a karma whore who posts an e-mail which has been circulating for years rather than trying to add some original thought to the discussion.

      But I'm probably just an idiot.

    69. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Micah · · Score: 1

      > Has a single prediction fortold in either that or the bible come true yet?

      Yes. Lots and lots and lots of them. In fact, I challenge you to find something that has NOT been fulfilled, excepting the prophecies that talk about the end times or "the Day of the Lord." And those are starting to be fulfilled too, as this story points out.

      See for yourself.

    70. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Most of the rules you cite are from the "Law of Moses," which according to the New Testament was fulfilled by Jesus Christ and is no longer in effect.

    71. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by nathanm · · Score: 1
      Greed of things unhad is the root of all evil
      Actually that's a common mistranslation of 1 Tim 6:10 from the King James Version. A more accurate translation is "the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil" (NIV or NKJV).
    72. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I take bill gate's full name, convert it to ascii and do some calculations I can get 666 out of it

      I've seen the post you're referring to, but it's actually incorrect - you can't take Bill Gates' name in ASCII and get 666.

      The only thing you can do is take
      BILL GATES III
      and 'convert' the III to the digit 3, THEN you get 666. Note that BILL GATES III is not his full name, or even close to it.

    73. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      The words against homosexuality are NOT Christ's. Romans and Corinthians were written by Paul, who never met Christ during his lifetime.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    74. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to look some of these passages up, and went to Bible.com. I clicked on Search the Bible, and typed in Leviticus (didn't see the 'jump to' option straight away). It gave me the funniest error message I've seen in quite a while...

      "Leviticus" was not found in the old or new testament.

    75. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satan and the beast (entitled anticrist) is two seperate people. I belive the beast will be a human beeing. Posessed, most likely, but still human. Just like prwious anticrists like Hitler etc.

    76. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      But the Bible and Jesus is very clear that the action of gays is wrong and defiling.

      So what? If you truly believe that then DON'T DO IT. Does that mean you are compelled to spew lies about some massive homosexual conspiracy theory designed to convert straight people to gay?

      The gays agenda is to destroy marriages!

      Sorry. It's not going to destroy my marriage. Period. There will NEVER be a shortage of straight people willing to get married and squirt out offspring. If you believe that allowing Gay marriage will destroy your marriage, then maybe you need to re-examine your own sexuality.

      They don't want marriage. How many gays stay in the same relationship for over 7 years? Not many.

      I suppose you haven't looked at the statistics for straights lately either, have you? They don't want marriage? Have you asked every single one of them? So, you're saying that attaction to the same sex automatically means they're against marriage? Far out man!
      All they want is equal treatment under the law. Do you know that if two people spend their entire lives together, that a domestic partner can be denied the right to attend their lifelong partner's deathbed? Just because they're not married? Is that fair? Is that righteous? Does that make the baby Jesus cry?

      but when they intrude on my family that crosses the line.

      I'm sorry, I didn't know that the Gay Mafia were sending hit squads of goons to break into your house at night, and sit between you and your wife on the couch and steal the remote, and force you to watch Will and Grace.

      When I have to explain why two men or women are kissing on TV, I have to explain why.

      Explain why to whom? I'll assume you're talking about your children. Poor baby. If you don't want your children exposed to that stuff, then YOU'RE IN LUCK! You're an American, and you're free to home-school them, teach them about Creation Science, that the Earth is Flat, the Moon Landing was a Hoax, and that babies come from the Cabbage Patch, and that people do not kiss, or hug, or screw, and that nakedness is not natural. If you don't like what's on TV, shut it off. If you don't like the outside world, go back into your cave and close the door.

      I, however, will properly equip my kids to deal with the realities of life on this planet - and that includes explaining to them about homosexuality. And yes - I will definately teach them that our church views it as sinful. And I will also teach them that this applies only to them, as people who choose to follow Christ and bear his cross. Those who do not choose to do so are NOT bound by those moral codes.

      And NO, I am not afraid that my kids will "choose" to become gay, because I had the audacity to not teach them a lie about the real world. And if they DO turn out gay, I will still love them, and I will not exclude them from my family.

      As for being gay in the genetics, how can you be a gay and your parents not if it is in the genes?

      Very simple. Human bodies go through biological changes during their life cycle. Glandular functions change. Hormone balance changes, organ function changes. A human body is physically capable of producing offspring by age 13. Irregardless of whether they were attracted to their partner! *gasp!* (do you think Mary was physically attracted to the Holy Spirit?) I don't think that there are a lot of 90-year-old women who are sexually attracted to men. I *do* believe that a genetically, inherently gay person CAN choose a life of chastity, or even a hetero life. Good for them if they do. But it's not up to me (nor is it up to Government) to spend my time creating an environment that compells, cajoles, or otherwise forces a person to make a choice to follow a given moral code.

      They are pushing their agenda and are destroying America as we know it. I refuse to have my kids grow up in that hostile type of climate.

      America, as you know it,

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    77. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by jafac · · Score: 1

      And don't forget. Pi=3.0 ;)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    78. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My life fulfils hundreds of OT prophecies too, but I don't think I'm the son of any gods - there's just so many of the prophecies to choose from.

      actually, I don't think jesus thought he was the son of god either, the islamic faith (which regards jesus as an important prophet, just not the son of god, is probably a more accurate account) - it's just certain Alexandrians found it handy to mix the Egyptian Osiris rebirth myth in with some greek philosphy and judaic symbolism to make a fashionable new religion that took Rome by storm, sending Jehovah to the top of the deity charts. Then somebody (Scotians, probably) hit upon the idea of allowing the accomodation of pagan deities into the christian system by demoting the pagan deities to "saints".

    79. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by leerpm · · Score: 1

      Yup. Silly me..

    80. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1
      So anyone who believes in something that can be neither proved nor disproved is an idiot? Or just the people whose beliefs conflict with yours? I must say though, I'm very much inclined to respect the opinions of a karma whore who posts an e-mail which has been circulating for years rather than trying to add some original thought to the discussion.



      Okay, so he can quote parts of a book that has been circulating for millennia to 'prove' his beliefs but I can't repost an e-mail which perfectly illustrates the ridiculousness of using bible quotes to prove a point?


      I could take any random book from the library and take a fragment here and a fragment there and make any point I want. If you want to use a book to prove your position use the whole book, in context.


      But I'm probably just an idiot.


      If you pound people on the head with bible quotes to push your religion of hate, well then you are.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    81. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I used to think that these folks were nuts.

      But, there is certain reason beyond these scriptures even if they aren't inspired by divinity. Restricting an individual or groups from commerce is the ultimate way to censure discord.

      Try counting the number of movies in recent years that have used turning off credit cards as a plot device to ruin someone. Further than that, count the number that have used tracking purchases as a way to find someone.

      It may or may not be the mark of the beast. However, it is the making of a beast.

      I say cash forever, it is the ultimate defense against tyrrany (Take THAT John Ashcroft)!!!!!!

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    82. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      New slogan

      Capitol One ... What's embedded in YOUR left hand???? ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    83. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The nature of or quantum reality dictates that god DOES play dice.

      Hence the method of gods gift of free choice is quantum mechanics. There too lies the methodology for god to meddle without being noticed. God need only load the right dice.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    84. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      It's kinda convenient to say the bible "predicted" a flood that it also dilligently reports. The existence of the prediction can't be independently verified. More importantly, neither can the flood.

      A global worldwide flood would be the easiest thing to find in the geological record. Despite impossible contortions of facts to make it so, such a worldwide layer of muck and mass extinction has never been identified.

      An exellent example of an allegorical flood has been found with the breach of the meditteranean boundry and the former Black Lake Valley (now the Black Sea). The world of the valley was forever flooded in spectacular fashion when the sea invaded a deep valley. Such an event is bound to make an impact in the folklore of the survivors.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    85. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      The men desired other men and the women desired other women. This is clearly coming true now. Homosexuals are becoming more prevalent and Homosexuality will become a legitamate way of life.

      Homosexual behavior can be found in most species of mammals. I doubt it's from Satans influence.

      God makes men what they are. I was made straight. No amount of influence or cajoling by satan could make me like "Queery as Folk". By the same reasoning, I believe gay folk when they say that they just ARE.

      I mean think about it. Boys are bombarded with gender identity since the time they are born. They are mocked ridiculed and harassed for any hint of feminimity. Any hint of queerness is met with brute violence. If you think anyone would CHOOSE that, you're just plain stupid.

      If looking at the opposite sex turns you on, you're straight. If looking at the same sex turns you on, you're queer. If looking at both sexes turns you on, you're bisexual. No amount of social pressure will make you otherwise.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    86. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I haven't ever witnessed gays trying to turn straight people queer. They largely just want to live and let live.

      Jesus of all people should teach you about acceptance and tolerance. Tolerance doesn't mean you have to LIKE something. It means that you don't harass people just because they're different.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    87. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Great, so all that shit about the graven image in a Georgia courthouse is really irrelevant now right???? The Ten Commandments are no longer in effect.

      By the way, all those folks praying in public for the TV cameras is consistent with the manner Jesus instructs on prayer.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    88. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      You don't understand the nature of our consumer economy do you. Mechanized society has made consumer culture a necessity. If we only bought what we needed, our economy would collapse overnight.

      We have commited through global agreemants to a policy of unconstrained growth. Growth is good because in growth allows the rich to suck up money while it is changing hands.

      Eventually we will HAVE to find a new way. Economic health should be measured by how well a hard worker is compensated. How equally wealth is distrubuted amongst everyone who contributes to their society ESPECIALLY those who do the jobs no one else wants.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    89. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. No reply from the parent poster I see. Perhaps he's too busy hunting down the delivery guy who delivered his pizza last Sabbath.

    90. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I spoke to god last night, he says your full of shit. He's particularly pissed because he has billions of worlds to look after and the constant whining of your likes is jamming up his prayer box.

      He's installed pram-buster 5.01 but apparantly Pat Robertson has already hacked his way around it.

      Specifically, God said that we're largely on our own and he doesn't have a special plan for "each and every one of us." God also said that your a bit egotistical to think that someone should be following you around for every bit of your life to make sure your were doing "ok".

      Oh yeah, god sounded distinctly female. She said, if a man gave birth to the universe it would have to come out of his ass!!!!!

    91. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the Nicene creed and the Catholic (universal) religion.

      There is a beauty in Catholicism in that it is a collection of religions. It is the greatest accomplishment of Rome. They had been assimilating religions for so long that Christianity was a natural.

      The ugly part is they aren't honest about it. They also persecuted folks who didn't come along for the ride.

      Every Rome-derived Christian is a pagan by inheritance.

    92. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I've seen PLENTY of people who say that "God Hates Fags". The more evangelical, the more hatred.

      This is not the path of Christ.

      The only people Christ was openly hostile towards was the priests in the temple and the moneychangers. I'm fully Christian in this respect.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    93. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      The Jews also were ardent numeroloists. 1000 years, the precise measurement of the final city of the saved, numbers of heads of beasts, the precise nuumber of the saved, all of those numbers had special and specific metaphorical meaning for the people of the 1st century, much of which we don't understand now.

      As for it being a literal prophecy of the end of days, it's pretty lame. Stars falling from the dome of the sky, like burning embers, moon of blood, all those things are silly.

      If you argue that they are meant to be interpreted, then you make my case. It's metaphor. Not literal in any way. What it is metaphor for hs been analyzed to death. Try Asimov's guide to the Bible.

      And people who believe the world is ending soon, they are the very people who don't give a damn about overpopulation, ecological damage, CO2 warming, species extinction, political knowledge of other cultures.. why should they? The world is ending! I can't stress this enough: the president doesn't care about bedrock environmental issues because he thinks the world is ending soon. Why make plans for hundreds or thousands of years? Why change your polluting industries? Why care about anything except your own salvation?

    94. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Nope. The earliest Christians were Jews, and were expected to be circumcised and follow kosher practices. Christ was a Jew.

      And you're reading me too literally. Almost EVERYone hated Rome, and wanted them to die. Political tracts written in metaphor to escape being skinned alive were common in the area.

      But the readers of Revelation in the 1st and 2nd centuries lived during the crushing of Masada and the final destruction of the Temple and the beginning of the Diaspora. Rome was all they concentrated on. All they hated.

    95. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Two thousand years of historical understanding. The sun is bright. The night is dark. A meter is a thousand millimeters.

      Belief that it is prophesy is just that, belief. If you are trained that it is all true, then all historical and scholarly references I can tiredly dig up will all register as the lies of Satan to you.

      But for anyone who wants to read up on the metaphor in Rev., then first try "Asimov's Guide to the Bible", part 2, the New Testament. Hint: it's in the last chapter. It's a starting point, and Asimov merely cited common scholarship.

      Rev. is the most analyzed book of the Bible. Check Google, look for not-to-angry discussion or essays on the subject.

    96. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by nathanm · · Score: 1
      The History Channel did a wonderful documentary about this misunderstood period of time hosted by Terry Jones. I highly recommend it.
      I've seen the first part of it, but I'd hardly call it wonderful, and it isn't going to clear up any misunderstanding either. It oversimplifies complicated issues too much, and they obviously don't understand Christian theology.
    97. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> And second, if you don't beleive in satan, how do
      >> you pledge your allegiance to him?

      If you don't believe that satan exists, then you are serving him (because you are not serving God, since you do not believe in what the Orthodox Christian Church (Christ's Bride) says).

    98. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by tgv · · Score: 1

      And Mary was a virgin, right? I doubt you will find many serious historians that will claim that the NT is largely true, even if they can agree upon what it actually says. Millions of people have been killed over translation errors in the bible and now you want me to believe that serious historians will underwrite your particular view?

      And it never occurred to you that the similarities between Jesus' life as portrayed in the NT with predictions that were known at the time the NT was written might be less the result of divine provenance than of human temptation? Or, put bluntly: that the NTs authors and translators simply fitted the predictions?

    99. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      I could careless if someone wanted to live their live as a Christian, but when they intrude on my family that crosses the line. When I have to explain why men or women are praying on TV, I have to explain why. If Christians believe truly in their religion, how is it that Christians can see their wrong and change their religious preference? It happens you know. They are pushing their agenda and are destroying America as we know it. I refuse to have my kids grow up in that hostile type of climate.

      --

      Yeah, slightly cut to fit better, I know. Note that I'm not American, and I don't have anything against Christians, it's just that what you are saying just sounds so...well...stupid. How are gay people making America a hostile climate by simply kissing on the TV. Oh no, shock horror, THEY ARE DOING THINGS THEY DO NORMALLY ON THE TV, THEY ARE PUSHING THEIR AGENDA ON ME! I will have to perform my parental duty and explain to my children what they are doing! [I'm assuming here that that is what you were referring to] As if they won't know about homosexuality anyway. I fail to see how this is different from somebody complaining about Christians pushing their agenda on them via Songs of Praise (English TV programme), and having to explain about why they are singing praise of - depending on religion of the complainer - a mythical being, a God which is not according to their beliefs, or whatever.

      To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if you're a troll...but I suppose it is still possible you aren't.

    100. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Here's a link which addresses that (although I don't think most Christians would agree that keeping the Sabbath is no longer a commandment... unless you count the fact that most of us keep it on Sunday rather than Saturday as it used to be).

    101. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "Quite honestly, I wouldn't be suprised if it leads to another Great Depression."

      I'd be extremely surprised if it did, as so many checks and balances were put in place last time that everyone's _waiting_ for it to happen, but...

      The major problem is things like interest rates; they're lowered to stimulate growth, but if people don't spend their money, but are, for example, waiting for impending financial doom that is generally connected with the words 'global recession', then finally your interest rates are in the toilet, and people get used to extremely low rates, relax, start to spend, then panic when the rates go up to curtail spending...

      By that point your average Schmo is operating close to margins on all forms of credit (mortgage, hire purchase, credit cards) and a 0.25% increase in the base rate becomes a crippling burden that can only be offset by more borrowing or longer terms. Indentured servitude and debtors prisons are coming close to being revived.

      As to whether people should take out credit, where are they warned? Do they educate in schools what 'APR' actually means? Do they look at the bottom line with a clear head, or is our current culture of creating desire for Star Trek Bobblehead dolls really that helpful?

      Slightly more offtopic is to consider the relatively irresponsible way that the international banks also encourage spending. Mainly because they know that they'll always be able to squeeze cash out of smaller/developing countries...this is widening the gap between cash rich nations and those that undergo creative leadership and create odious debt. I believe Iraq currently owes roughly $400 billion after being 'liberated'. $100 million by HSBC, which kinda explains why they were bombed in Turkey.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    102. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I respect this point of view. But I also believe it's a bit weak. I view it as a way to squirm out of god's law because the old Testament is pretty impractical. It's also an excellent way to blend Judaism, Christianity and Paganism (specifically sun worship (Mithraism, cult of Ahten)) which are the foundation for modern christianity derived from the Roman Catholic (universal) church.

      There are Christian denominations like the Seventh Day Adventists who keep the Sabbath on Saturday. The Church of James (brother of Jesus) also keeps the Sabbath on Saturday as well as Jewish tradition (Jesus Jews).

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    103. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by evbergen · · Score: 1

      At least have the courtesy to spell the name right of such an important man.

      Hari Seldon was the name.

      Cheers,

      Emile.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
    104. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if you're an atheist and have gay friends, it's hard not to view Christians (and, lets be fair, Muslims and several other religions) as backwards idiots with their heads full of the same crazy shit their parents believed in.

      >But that still does not mean we should not try to stem the tide of the homosexual
      >community.

      It's natural. It's normal. Animals do it too. Get over it. Talk to a gay person. More importantly, listen to them. You don't have to like what they do, just appreciate that it's none of your business and they're not harming anyone.

      I'm a straight guy, I like anal sex and I don't intend to have kids, except by accident, which is why I use contraception. Is there really any difference between me and a gay guy? Why don't I hear Christians going on and on and on and on about people like me?

      Oh, and Christians - why the poor dress sense and bad taste in music?

    105. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by wackysalut · · Score: 1

      And who owns History Channel, tell me ?

    106. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Schemat1c · · Score: 1
      And who owns History Channel, tell me ?

      Satan?

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    107. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by wackysalut · · Score: 1

      Come on, I wasn't joking.

      I mean those who own commercial television has for sure no interest in showing people Christianity, because it's kind of two opposite principles.

    108. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And Mary was a virgin, right?

      Wasn't that a translation error? "Virgin" rather than "young unmarried woman" or something similar?

    109. Re:Mark of the Beast ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I mean those who own commercial television has for sure no interest in showing people
      >Christianity, because it's kind of two opposite principles.

      People who own commercial tv want to make a profit from showing popular tv programs. Christianity is for the old, simple, or senile, or those suffering some sort of life-change such as alcoholism/drug problems, a failed marriage or dead children or something. It's impossible to make such people interesting to other normal people. Remember, popular culture (magazines, tv etc) tells you what you are doing, and no-one is `doing` Christianity.

  9. I have a bad feeling about this by billmaly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gut reaction here says that someone, somewhere, would setup some means of remotely reading an RFID tag, hacking whatever PW/encryption is on it, and draining bank accounts. I could see it for small transactions, tolls, fast food, gas, etc. but would be leary about this sort of thing for all financial transactions.

    1. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      now, I am going to steer clear of any sort of discussion regarding my absolute hatred of RFIDs and their privacy implications.

      That said... What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      Who needs to hack any sort of PW/encryption to do it now?

    2. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by robslimo · · Score: 2, Informative

      What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      My paper shredder, that's what. Confetti type; cuts vertically and horizontally. Don't take your trash to the curb without using one first.

    3. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Doctor7 · · Score: 2, Informative
      What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      I don't know what kind of information is on your bank statement, but mine and every one I've seen only have enough information to allow you to deposit into the account, not withdraw. Some hacking or social engineering would still be required to get to the point of being able to drain the account.

    4. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Funny

      If all that would be required to debit these things is proximity to a receiver - pretty much necessary if they're to be used in the manner described - where is the security? Could someone just carry a receiver through a crowd, charging $1 from everyone who passes within a meter or so? I'll have to get me one of those!

    5. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't feel that in this particular forum that I needed to dumb it down as far as you felt necessary.

      I guess I am of the "old Slashdot" where I still have faith in the fact that those that actually bother to read the posts that aren't modded "+5 Funny" have a brain that can think for themselves.

    6. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      I must say that I prefer the rapid oxidization method of document disposal.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    7. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Effective, but:

      a. The oxidation must be maximally complete to be fully effective.
      b. My insurance provider requires that my abode be equipped with rapid oxidation detectors which would likely perform as designed subsequent to my disposal of documents using your preferred method. As a design feature, the rapid oxidation detectors cause high amplitude oscillation of air particles in the upper auditory range of frequency. This is undesirable.

    8. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not. In order to keep it secure, your name, address, social security number, intimate details of your life and especially spending habbits, along with several pictures of you would appear on the screen. It would also snap another picture of you right there to add to the collection. If someone stole it, it would be immediately obvious and their picture would be taken anyway. Sure it is a minor loss of privacy, but you don't want them terrorists to win do you? LOOK AT THE SILLY MONKEY!

    9. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      In my case the answer is: Paranoia. I shred anything I throw away, and keep bank and credit card statements pretty much indefinately. They don't take up much room when you come right down to it and I feel a lot safer knowing where they are.

      HANDY TIP #1: If you do throw away stuff that is confidential then buy a shredder and shred it first.

      HANDY TIP #2: After you have finished shredding put it all in a plastic bag and add some water. Let soak for a while before chucking it in the dumpster. Wet paper make terrible jigsaw puzzles! (It is also more socially acceptable than a burning your confidential papers if you live in an aparement).

      HANDY TIP #3: Use the thickest tin foil you can find for your hat. They cheaper stuff tends to be too thin to keep its shape properly.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    10. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by pmz · · Score: 1

      What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      A shredder...or an incinerator for the really paranoid.

      For example, with separate-from-body devices, all it takes is some responsibility to control them. A quick call to a bank, a second to shred something, keeping different passwords on each account, being suspicious of e-mail or phone calls soliciting information, etc. If I want to dispense of a credit card, all I need to do is call the bank and cut the card into 100 pieces...what if the card is in my arm???

    11. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by CrayzyJ · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you are incorrect. From personal experience, with JUST a checking account number people are able to buy stuff over the phone. Once a thief gets a hold of that, you're done.

      --
      Holy s-, it's Jesus!
    12. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Doctor7 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if that's possible in this country. The account number alone will not be accepted by the bank to authorise a withdrawal, only a deposit. To my knowledge, the only way to use a current account over the phone/internet is if it has a debit card, and that number is not on the statement (and quite often uses an additional security code in the same way as credit cards).

    13. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Just put a RFID reciever in your hand. Every time you shake hands with someone -- cha-ching!

      Hey, that'd be a great way for campaigning politicians to rack up the donations at a rally, hmm?

    14. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Fjord · · Score: 1

      So what are you supposed to do, not write checks? The account number is on the bottom of each one.

      --
      -no broken link
    15. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      My home came with an escape route for the by-products of rapid oxidization, as well as a special chamber for the rapid oxidization itself.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    16. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by redfenix · · Score: 1

      That's why the numbers are written in that funny looking typeface, so no-one can decipher them.

      --
      "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    17. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Remote reading:

      There are different implementations of RFID. Some long range, some close range (within inches). Obviously a payment solution would/should incorporate the later.

      2) Security:

      Has anyone hooked up a mag stripe reader and passed a credit card through it? No encryption! Enough said.

    18. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      You mean you crap out the window?

      (Sorry, this was begging for a "Blackadder The Second" reference ;)

    19. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by WNight · · Score: 1

      Plus, the government is in bed with the tinfoil manufacturers. Who actually believes they'd give people the power to protect themselves? Hah!

      They laser-drill microscopic holes in the foil, just enough to let through the ultra-high frequency waves they use for mind-control.

      The way to protect yourself is to buy tinfoil from two or more companies (despite their bets efforts, they can't seem to produce the exact same pattern of holes) and Put every second layer at about a 15 degree offset to the one below it. This minimizes the chance that two holes overlap and let in the radiation. Use enough layers and the chance is near enough to zero.

      Also, if possible, move to a colder climate. Unfortunately there's less moisture in the air which helps the efficiency of the mind-control beams, but you won't look conspicuous wearing a large cap with ear muffs. This is essential because a tinfoil cap that doesn't cover your temples and the back of your neck isn't effective.

      Pass the word, we've got to stay safe!

    20. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Gut reaction here says that someone, somewhere, would setup some means of remotely reading an RFID tag, hacking whatever PW/encryption is on it, and draining bank accounts

      Funny, just last Sunday I watched a futuristic "Outer Limits" episode where everyone was required to have these type of implants. You had to have them for basically everything (a reader to access your computer, shopping, id, etc.).

      The technology was supposed to be hack-proof because it connected to your dna string and was supposedly be rendered useless w/o proper dna match.

      And of course someone found a way to go around it, so a person could be impersonated within another person. According to the system you were someone else because the chip said so. Kind of scary if you think about it...

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    21. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by AMuse · · Score: 1

      That said... What stops people now from rummaging through your garbage, finding your bank statements, and draining your bank accounts?

      1) My paper shredder
      2) My neighbors, who would tell me if someone rummaged through my garbage
      3) My dogs

    22. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Merk · · Score: 1

      Tinfoil armbands?

      Look, if you're worried about the privacy of implanted RFID tags, *don't get one*! If you're worried about the privacy of credit cards, *don't get one*!

      Cash has been around for a couple of millennia, and it doesn't look like it will disappear anytime soon. Sure, there will always be a tradeoff between ease of use and anonymity/privacy.

      Until the government starts forcing people to use insecure forms of identification or authentification, why worry? Sure, you can complain when WalMart starts using RFID on consumer products if it's done in an insecure way. You can also vote with your dollars, because I'm sure there will be other stores that won't (at least at first) use RFID-tagged consumer goods.

    23. Re:I have a bad feeling about this by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Oh, okay. I feel so much better now. :)

      --
      -no broken link
  10. God let's get this over with by Illserve · · Score: 1

    Let's mandate RFID injections so we can end the /. bickering over "personal freedom" and get back to laughing at SCO and MS bashing. At least until that's illegal too.

  11. Nope. by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It'll not happen in the US. Waaaaaaaay too many fundamentalist Christians about. I agree with them on this one, not because it's the mark of the beast, but because I don't like the idea of something in my body being money. I still like the cred' stick idea from Shardowrun. Anonymous, secure and very convenient. Near impossible to counterfeit and no money to print.

    1. Re:Nope. by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, I think this is the first time I've ever been glad that America is over-run by fundamentalist Christians...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't like the idea of something in my body being money
      I quite like how money my body is. Ooh, baby, yeah.
    3. Re:Nope. by OccSub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I see another poster kind of beat me to it, but the fundies are way off. If Christ is coming again, then why do they want to stop prophecy from being fulfilled? I guess they just aren't ready. "Lord, I am so close to getting that 40 ft yacht, and I want to make sure my kids have a sprawling family estate to inherit... that's it! In your holy wisdom, please hold off until I'm done being a greedy fundie bastard." P.S. I have a few of these little bastards (chips) right here right now :) They're not so scary, actually. They're about the size of a big grain of rice.

    4. Re:Nope. by aborchers · · Score: 1
      I agree with them on this one, not because it's the mark of the beast, but because I don't like the idea of something in my body being money.


      Don't be so sure your motivations and theirs are all that different. Has it ever occured to you that the warnings of the MOTB might be rooted in the same concerns that you have? In other words, maybe St John the Divine was a prototype civil libertarian concerned about loss of privacy. For lack of better terms, a first century CE mystic described a vision of biometrics and implantation as a "mark of the beast". How else would he desribe it? Even if he had the full story, I can't imagine "RFID tags" would have been a particularly useful description to his audience at the time.

      Just a thought...
      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    5. Re:Nope. by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree with them on this one, not because it's the mark of the beast, but because I don't like the idea of something in my body being money.

      Aside from the quarter shoved up the nose on a double-dog dare when we were kids.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    6. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll not happen in the US. Waaaaaaaay too many fundamentalist Christians about.

      I dunno... wait until they realize that instead of passing the collection plate, they just have to scan you as you enter the church.

    7. Re:Nope. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Over-run by fundies? I think not.

      The major fundamentalist Christian denomination would be Baptists (and not all of them.) But assuming the worst case, in 1990, 19.4% of United States citizens themselves Baptists, in 2001, 16.3% considered themselves Baptists. Adding up the others gives about 40% that are more than likely not fundamentalists.

      Give room for plenty of error, and you're still not being over-run. It's just they happen to be the loudest group.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Nope. by martinX · · Score: 1

      Pity he didn't have a vision of a calendar so he could have set a date for all these prophecies.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    9. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt anyone will read this post since it is AC but I was thinking exactly the same thing. It is actually comforting, I almost want to encourage them.

    10. Re:Nope. by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL. Well, I may consider myself a "fundamentalist" Christian simply because I do believe Christ will come again, is the Son of God, etc. etc; however the point you make is spot on for unfortunately too many of the "Christians" in America. I put the word in quotes because quite often the soccer moms who claim to be good little church-goers really don't practice what they preach anyways, and I probably wouldn't agree with them on the fundamentals of being a Christian anyways.

      So anyways, what I'm saying is that if you people have studied the Bible at all, you may have noticed that it's not really the "technology" that has anything to do with Christ's return. Ultimately, it's the anti-Christ's requiremments that every single person in the world is forced to take the mark of the Beast on the hand and on the forehead. Whether that's a tatoo, RFID tag, or WHATEVER, it doesn't matter. The Bible states no one except God the Father knows when Jesus Christ will return, and hence it's really pointless of the "fundies" you referred to, to worry much about this RFID tag stuff. I claim to be a Christian, and I'd use the RFID chip in a smart media card as my "new cash." What a great technology! God gave us brains, let's use 'em! Just as long as some dictator and/or leader isn't requiring me to put one on my hand and forehead to proclaim his greatness (basically).

      I don't have all the answers of course, I'm only human. But just know that not all true "fundamentalist" Christians deplore the idea behind this RFID tech, just maybe the uses possible. Kinda like any tech. Guns are realtively "new" technologies, and yet they can be used for both good and evil. All depends on the motives behind the use of the tech, not just the tech itself.

    11. Re:Nope. by aborchers · · Score: 1

      For all we know he did, and it was expunged by his editors in order to wield political influence. :-)

      My suspicion has always been that his warning was about things to come in the relatively near (from his perspective) future, and when you consider the way Christians were treated in reigns like Caligula's, that's not hard to believe.

      Treating those prophecies as applying to potential future events from our perspective is informative in the same way as books like 1984, in the sense that they provide warnings about unchecked authoritarian governments. That message is, sadly, apparently timeless.

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    12. Re:Nope. by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Actually, as I recall, about 60+ percent of Americans believe that Revelations is the literal prediction of the end of the world.

      The Baptist Convention is simply the largest and the most political (the only major U.S. religious group to back the Iraq invasion). But push comes to shove, most of the nation believes what they believe.

      Most of the nation also believes in UFO spaceships, angels, ghosts, magic, Satanic cults taking over whole towns, terrorists under every bed, cities as the source of evil, George Bush, and chiropractics.

      Asimov and Sagan were right. War between the irrational and the rational, thought and emotion, science and magic.

      The thing is, we've almost all the nuclear bombs. And we're making more.

      Have a nice day!

    13. Re:Nope. by pmz · · Score: 1

      I think this is the first time I've ever been glad that America is over-run by fundamentalist Christians...

      Well, there is a religion-agnostic way, too. It's called Freedom. People who really care about Freedom would never require any other person to carry an implanted ID.

    14. Re:Nope. by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because I'm sure he would have been able to read English.

    15. Re:Nope. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      I've long wondered why they are so gung-ho against the death penalty and euthanasia. I mean, wouldn't the wrongly killed be treated justly in the afterlife? And why keep the old and in-pain here suffering when if they deserve it they'd get into ye old land of honey?

      Of course, it's probably because of Rev. 14.3-4:
      And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins.

      So only 144,000 celibate men are being saved, so I doubt many are in a rush to hurry things along. Of course, I may have just inadvertently turned some Slashdot readers into fundamental Christians... (Interesting aside: this and similar verses are why priests swear celibacy.)

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    16. Re:Nope. by colinduplantis · · Score: 1

      Amen!

      Oh, wait...

      --
      If you love something, let it go. If it comes back to you, hump its leg.
    17. Re:Nope. by frankjr · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I think many Christians today would accept it if Ashcroft approves of it.

    18. Re:Nope. by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      So only 144,000 celibate men are being saved, so I doubt many are in a rush to hurry things along.

      The 144,000 men are the 12,000 members of the 12 tribes of Israel used to spread the Gospel around the world during the tribulation. They have the mark of Christ.

      I am against the death penalty because one of the Ten Commandments is "thou shall not kill". Same applies for euthanasia.

      One more point on the 144,000 saved: the Bible says the road is wide but the gate is narrow for salvation. There are six billion people on this earth. If ONLY 144,000 are saved during the Tribulation, why put off salvation? The gate is indeed narrow.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    19. Re:Nope. by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I think many Christians today would accept it if Ashcroft approves of it.

      I agree with your statement. Just because this is a "conservative" administration (in name only, IMHO) people tend to just go along with whatever is done.

      I vehemently disapprove of the Patriot Act and all these homeland security measures. Why should my personal freedoms be eroded because of a terrorist? We as a country have let them win.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    20. Re:Nope. by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      To answer your question first, if only 144,000 celibate men are to be saved then this god of yours is pretty much a dick. First, no women will be saved, so he created them to be damned. Second, only those who spread the Gospel, so no murdered or 'sacrificed' (see below) children will be saved; nor will anyone born before the gospel (Adam? Moses? David?). No one who's followed the 'go forth and multiply' line, since they've defiled themselves with women. The majority of people on this planet are not descendants of the 12 tribes, so their out before they were born. By your reasoning, there's no point in trying since we're all pretty much damned already.

      I am against the death penalty because one of the Ten Commandments is "thou shall not kill". Same applies for euthanasia.

      So you consistently follow the 'ten commandments'? Don't forget these:
      Exodus 32:18
      The feast of unleavened bread shalt thou keep. Seven days thou shalt eat unleavened bread, as I commanded thee, in the time of the month Abib: for in the month Abib thou camest out from Egypt.
      32:20
      But the firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb: and if thou redeem him not, then shalt thou break his neck. All the firstborn of thy sons thou shalt redeem. And none shall appear before me empty.
      34:22
      And thou shalt observe the feast of weeks, of the firstfruits of wheat harvest, and the feast of ingathering at the year's end.
      34:23
      Thrice in the year shall all your menchildren appear before the LORD God, the God of Israel.
      34:28
      And he wrote upon the tablets the words of the covenant, the ten commandments. [In other words, the passages immediately preceding, some of which are above.]

      I'm not sure, but that 32:20 sounds a lot like kill your child. This one's a little clearer:
      Ex.22:29
      Thou shalt not delay to offer the first of thy ripe fruits, and of thy liquors: the firstborn of thy sons shalt thou give unto me.

      Yeah, it's fun ignoring contradictions by either not reading for ourselves or by selective omissions of what was read.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    21. Re:Nope. by heresyoftruth · · Score: 1

      Yes! Shadowrun! I not only want my credstick, but some nifty cybereyes, too!

      --
      Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
    22. Re:Nope. by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      In reference to your guns example: Guns can be used for good or for evil. However, the difference I see with these RFIDs is who has control of its intended purpose. If I pickup a gun, that choice lies with me. If I get an RFID implanted, regardless of my level of faith in the institution utilizing the RFID, that RFID can be used to collect information, to exploit people and their lives, invade their privacy, steal, etc. all by people and things which I have no control over. Also, I can try and fight against a percieved evil wielding a gun. It's harder to fight something or someone you can't see, or don't even realize is causing harm. I couldn't stand to be that knowingly helpless. Just my $0.02

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    23. Re:Nope. by blackbear · · Score: 1

      I still like the cred' stick idea from Shardowrun.

      Good idea, and a fun game, but as an ex-employee of the NSA once told me; As you expand your sphere of influence, you gain greater control of the things in that sphere.

      Anonymous cash is contrary to that doctrine. It allows an individual the autonomy to make purchases anonymously. And that, of course, means the government can't stick its nose in your finances to make sure you're paying your taxes to feed the power hungry monster.

    24. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, the point of the Mark is not that you get it, but that it only works IF you agree to forsake Christianity. So, just having the RFID isn't the issue, its the fact that eventually it will be the case that you must leave the church or you will not be able to buy and sell, own property, etc etc.

      Frankly, the technology to DO that to Christians already exists. No RFID tags necessary, just zero out their credit ratings, revoke their SSID, confiscate their bank accounts. The will to do it isn't there yet with the general populace. Yet. In general. I think there are a lot of people on Slashdot ahead of the curve on that particular development of thought.

  12. 1st Generation Device by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny

    These devices used to be so big even goatse had trouble implanting one!

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  13. Why not put the chip in a watch? by SpaceRook · · Score: 1

    Why not just put it in a watch or something?

    1. Re:Why not put the chip in a watch? by floydigus · · Score: 1

      Because then someone can steal your watch. Granted, this would actually be better than having someone steal your finger.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    2. Re:Why not put the chip in a watch? by jglien · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about Swatch doing just this in a trial for Swiss transportation payment.

      Don't know if it was rolled out further tho..

    3. Re:Why not put the chip in a watch? by SpaceRook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because then someone can steal your watch. Granted, this would actually be better than having someone steal your finger.

      Well, yeah. Thieves used to break into cars when the owner wasn't around because the underlying security mechanism was easier to bypass. Now that this isn't the case, the thieves simply wait for the owner to unlock the car and then steal it at gunpoint. Let them take my watch...they can already take my credit card if they really want to (C'mon, do you think the 17-year-old kid behind the register at Target is REALLY paying that much attention to whether the signatures match?)

    4. Re:Why not put the chip in a watch? by floydigus · · Score: 1

      do you think the 17-year-old kid behind the register at Target is REALLY paying that much attention to whether the signatures match?

      Where I live they don't even pretend to check for a match. Some seem to think it would be an insult to check your signature and others think they can tell if you're a crook just by looking at you.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

  14. Religion by Psiren · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is it that religion really brings out the nutcases. I hope that I can get one, just so I can wind the poor confused bastards up. What better way to spend a Saturday afternoon? ;)

    1. Re:Religion by BeProf · · Score: 1

      First of all, not all religious people are "nutcases". I, for one, am an evangelical christian and am quite sane, I assure you. I know of no formal studies on the relative level of mental illness in religious vs. non-religious people, but based on my own observations, I'd bet the numbers would come out pretty much the same accross the board.

      Second, evangelical Christians are not in agreement on the details of eschatology (the theology of the end times). Many evangelicals do fall into the pre-trib/pre-millenial (i.e. "Left Behind") camp that may be troubled by something like this, but many evangelicals, esp. those of the Reformed persuasion have either no strong position, are post-millenialists, or are amillenialists.

      Third of all, why exactly would you take joy in "winding the poor confused bastards up"? If it's their choise not to use this technology, why does that bother you? Do you sit up at night thinking up ways to piss off the Amish? Do you yearn for the next time you can have a cheesburger or eat ham in front of an observant Jew?

      I would never begrudge you your right to say and do whatever you want whenever you want, but I will simply ask that you think about what you're doing and try to show at least a modicum of respect to those who may not believe what you believe.

      --
      You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    2. Re:Religion by aborchers · · Score: 1
      Why is it that religion really brings out the nutcases.


      Why is it that slashdot really brings out the flamebait?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Religion by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Why is it that slashdot really brings out the flamebait?

      Because idiots like us keep responding to it.

    4. Re:Religion by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      "Do you sit up at night thinking up ways to piss off the Amish? Do you yearn for the next time you can have a cheesburger or eat ham in front of an observant Jew?" Yes, and yes. Q: Why doesn't jesus like M & M's ? A: They fall through the holes in his hands!

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    5. Re:Religion by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is it that religion really brings out the nutcases.

      I really don't think that's the case. I mean, think about it, religous or not the "masses" are poorly educated, and we boggle at the conclusions they come to on a regular basis. I mean, look how many continue to support Bush's war. Look at the support for the drug war. The number of people who buy products from spam.

      The problem isn't religion. It's that the majority of the population seems to lack critical thinking skills in sufficient measure. Anyone with real time and study invested in what they believe would know better than to claim this is the mark of the beast. Being able to buy an sell goods is *not* sufficient. Neither is it being implanted. The point of the mark is to signifiy your allegience to the "beast". The means he will employ to get you to do so is to ban you from buying and selling goods unless you have it.

      Given all of biblical history, why would anyone with decent critical thinking skills believe that God would suddenly, at the end of history, change his (unchangeable) personality and try to trick people into accepting the mark?

      Meanwhile, there are perfectly good and valid reasons to NOT take this chip, that they should be focusing on, along with the rest of the population. Like the issue of the potential for the government to track you regardless of whether you're purchasing anything or not. Or heck, for that matter, for /anyone/ to track you. Granted, it's short range, but anyone with a decent receiver and antenna could at least tail you easily.

      Aside from that, you have the issues of security. If it's implanted, that means all administration, and transactions work wirelessly. So that means anyone with the skills to hack it can also do them w/out having to be in physical contact with the device. Scary.

      So I don't think it's "religion" that brings out the nuts. I think people without the ability to manage critical thinking are generally out there, just that different issues bring out different groups of them. Every group has them, and as large a group as "Christians" is will have a lot of them. Heck, we see it here on this board within our *own* group. It's just a reality of the level of education our public schools provide. Some people are able ot rise above that and educate themselves sufficiently to reason effectively, but many people are not, or at least they don't choose to.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    6. Re:Religion by Urkki · · Score: 1

      What if it's the other way around, nutcases bringing religions into existense ;-)

    7. Re:Religion by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      I know of no formal studies on the relative level of mental illness in religious vs. non-religious people, but based on my own observations, I'd bet the numbers would come out pretty much the same accross the board.

      The prevalence of religious belief pretty much precludes it being considered mental illness. I wonder if that would still be the case if, say, only 2% of people were strongly religious?

      I would never begrudge you your right to say and do whatever you want whenever you want

      If only more evangelical Christians felt this way...

    8. Re:Religion by uradu · · Score: 1

      > Given all of biblical history, why would anyone with decent critical
      > thinking skills believe that God would suddenly, at the end of history,
      > change his (unchangeable) personality and try to trick people into
      > accepting the mark?

      When talking to fundies, they never have a satisfactory answer to this one. I mean, if the Mark Of The Beast is something physical that could be forced on you against your will (say, by holding you down and implanting the tag), how would that reflect your own personal choice? After all, the whole underlying moral of the Bible is that of free will and personal choice and the consequences thereof. Most theologians today consider the MOTB to be something abstract, a personal choice and allegiance to the side of Good or Evil (or whatever), not an actual physical mark.

    9. Re:Religion by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Almost anything brings out the nutcases - just take an objective look at slashdot/kuro5hin and so on.

      --
    10. Re:Religion by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      -Given all of biblical history, why would anyone with decent critical thinking skills believe that God would suddenly, at the end of history, change his (unchangeable) personality and try to trick people into accepting the mark?-

      Perhaps you should try practicing the critical thinking skills you actually accuse others of not having (nice touch of elitism, there, by the way.)

      God isn't going to trick anyone into receiving the mark. They'll do it of their own free will because they reject him and embrace the anti-Christ. There are many, many people today (and some of them even make posts about unthinking religious nuts) who would gladly embrace someone who would stand and say: There is no God, I am your god, so follow me and reject all this idiotic Christian crap.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    11. Re:Religion by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actually, it'll probably be like a digital cert. The Beast's signature certifying the Global CA. Global CA certifies National CA, State CA, District CA, Issuer CA, who then certifies YOUR personal certificate.

      Initially everything will be nice and fine - all done with smart cards. Everything gets done _conveniently_ with a single smart card (single point of failure). Then people will be losing cards, stealing cards, tampering with etc, with a nice big PR uproar. Instead of splitting roles/etc up into separate cards, they'll start embedding them on people. With only a few crazy fundies opposing it of course.

      Meanwhile the legal justice systems have to be unified "of course", due to hackers and very bad things happening cross borders. Global Court.

      Once everything is nice and centralized, and everyone is nicely strapped in for the ride, the Beast just has to sit in the driver's throne and say: "For the World and Dog's safety, anyone who does not swear allegiance to me/Global CA are BAD PEOPLE/TERRORISTS and will have their certificates revoked."

      And within 30 days or however long it takes for various systems to update their CRLs (certificate revocation lists), the certs of the Bad people become invalid, and they cannot do anything - buy, sell, travel.

      So I think the theologians are likely talking out of their expertise here. What I'm talking about is technologically viable today. Geopolitically not viable yet, but given the scaremongering and the large numbers of suckers/naive/ignorant/apathetics, it sure doesn't look that far off.

      --
    12. Re:Religion by salemnic · · Score: 1

      Given all of biblical history, why would anyone with decent critical thinking skills believe that God would suddenly, at the end of history, change his (unchangeable) personality and try to trick people into accepting the mark?

      I don't really think that it's "tricking" that bothers most of these individuals, but that eventually, if implanted tags were to become popular, that it would eventually become the only method of buying and selling. The bible does mention that the mark of the beast would be necessary to buy or sell.

      Not that I believe that an RFID tag is any more the MOTB than cold hard cash, but there's no way in hell that I'd get one of those things implanted into me. Imagine the drive-by funds transfers after a 0-day exploit!

      -s

    13. Re:Religion by j3110 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any being that resorts to torture because his creation doesn't do what he wants is not devine nor perfect. Infact, it's very childish. I don't set my computer ablaze because my program has a bug. I don't insist that the program corrupted itself because I gave it the ability to be corrupt. And lastly, I don't claim to love anything then torture it when it doesn't love me back. I think I'm a better person than the Christian god, because I don't have to inflict my will on any other being. Even if Christianity is right, I don't want to have any part of that kind of "love". If a god wants me to believe or love him, giving me a book full of threats and contradiction is not a step in the right direction.

      So... to answer your question, just about anyone that believes in that kind of thing has to be nutcase to begin with. Rational, logical thought is at odds with the popular definition of faith (unfounded belief). Rational people don't believe in the tooth fairy. Most rational people will say there is no convincing evidence yet that there is or is not a creator.

      Most rational people wouldn't fight this if it was:
      Secure (More like smart cards)
      Anonymous (Vendor makes a transaction, Bank/Credit company signs transaction, you sign the signed transaction that the Bank/Credit company gives you the key for that Bank/Credit company... Must be several credit companies and banks so you can pick the ones you trust and assign them the keys you want.)
      Safe (Has this kind of thing been tested?)
      Convenient (I don't have to sleep with my hand on a magnetic pad to charge it do I?)
      Controlled (I should be able to control every aspect of the device... even turning it on and off. I don't want the government, enemies, or criminals using it to track me, but medical personell and family should be able to.)

      This device is far, far from optimal. I don't even know if it's possible to make a smart enough device that I could trust. There would definately have to multiple vendors of said chip. In fact, I probably wouldn't trust it unless the spec was public and I could build my own.

      That said, it holds a lot of promise. I would make mine determine blood alcohol level and keep me from starting my car. Of course my car would only start for me, and I wouldn't need a key for anything. I would store my diary on it, encrypted of course. I would put a buz function in it to alert me of my meetings. I would probably actually put it near my ear, so it could actually deliver voice. I would use it to sign email. I would have the possiblity of having multiple identities on my same chip. I would try to get enough storage for audio books for long flights, and even some porn! It should be able to pick up my voice, so it should be able to be used as a cell phone with some of those inexpensive, small, voice recognition chips they put in cell phones. (I like cancer!... actually you would probably install a lot of it on top of your head with some kind of stainless steal shielding.)

      The more I think about it, the less I see this as needing to be internal. Why not just have a cell phone like PDA that requires you're thumb print and a password to sign transactions. Sure, it'll be expensive, but not if the government would stop trying to spy on everyone. If the government would stop crashing satelites into the atmosphere, this would probably have been possible with irridium.

      --
      Karma Clown
    14. Re:Religion by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      You can't honsetly post to slashdot and complain about religious nutcases. The opensource world is full od more nutcases/zealots than just about any other area. And don't even get me started on the privacy nutcases out there. I'm not dissing any of the "nutcases", but you've got to feel a little hypocritical posting to slashdot and complaining about nutcases while you sit with your tinfoil hat cocked at a jaunty angle.

    15. Re:Religion by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Given all of biblical history, why would anyone with decent critical thinking skills believe that God would suddenly, at the end of history, change his (unchangeable) personality and try to trick people into accepting the mark?

      You're forgetting the story of Job. You know, where god makes a bet with satan and then proceeds to torture the pious Job by killing is family, his livestock, and his crops, leveling his home, and giving him horrible diseases. The lesson being that if your life sucks, buck up. God probably just has another bet with satan, and you're the lucky one to prove him right! Some day you too will be given everything back and live to 140! As long as you keep praying! At our church! Did you notice the hat we're passing around?

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    16. Re:Religion by uradu · · Score: 1

      > So I think the theologians are likely talking out of their expertise here.
      > What I'm talking about is technologically viable today.

      I still don't see how this makes the tag the MOTB. You have to swear allegiance to something in order to recieve it and buy food. What could this Something be? Denouncing terrorism and pledging allegiance to Christian values and the President of the USA or whatever? Because that's pretty much the direction we're going. The most powerful people in the world are the very ones spouting the most Christian rhetoric. Are you saying that all of a sudden Bush or whoever are going to reverse course and say "forget God and all that stuff, say you believe in ME and what I say, or you're not getting any food"? If he did that, he'd lose any moral authority, credibility and public support. If, on the other hand, he would require you to pledge allegiance to All Things Christian to receive your tag, what exactly would be the problem? Doesn't make any sense.

    17. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to revelation, a whole host of things would have to happen before that...making it very obvious when you were or were not accepting the mark of the beast. This would include a host of plagues, the anti-christ being assasinated then ressurected then proclaiming to be God.....etc

    18. Re:Religion by TheLink · · Score: 1
      Yes the tag isn't the MOTB. It's not that stage yet. Just testing the waters.

      Pledging allegiance to Christian values and the President of the USA?

      Christians are not to pledge complete allegiance to "Christian values" or any President, their allegiance should be to Christ. And Christian values should then result as a "side effect" of that allegiance. The resulting values could produce some loyalty to country, submission to Governments and authorities. There's a difference there.

      AFAIK waging crusades just ain't very Christian in Jesus' book. Even if it baas like a sheep, if it's not walking like a sheep it's not a good example of a sheep. I'm not saying its a wolf, but I'd suggest keeping a close eye on any suspect sheep and his friends. I mean: President "Crusader" Bush? President "Operation Infinite Justice"? President "Iraq a big danger to the World with tons of WMD, and psst don't forget Osama, 9/11, WTC"? Shouldn't he be saying stuff like "I could have been a bit wrong about the Iraqi WMD" by now?

      There are lots of things happening under the banner of Christianity which are quite dubious.

      It is very disappointing that a bunch of Christian leaders can make a gay divorcee a Bishop - One who says: "I do have this sense I'm supposed to go forward, and I do feel that's coming from God and not my own ego. But I don't know." He's not sure whether it is his ego or God, and he's willing to _knowingly_ split the Church on that. And the other Bishops still approve. Doh. Call me names (antigay etc) if you want but honestly and logically, what can we conclude from that? A christian leader and his independent christian advisors better be 100% sure if he ever wishes to take action that might split a church.

      1 Timothy 3:2 (NIV) Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach,
      1 Timothy 3:2 (KJV) A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
      3:4 (NIV) He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.
      3:7 He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.

      1 Timothy 3

      --
    19. Re:Religion by El · · Score: 1

      Because religion as preached by many requires certain concepts to be accepted on faith, regardless of whether or not they are logically consistent or fit in with our personal experience. How do you tell if that little voice in your head is God giving you personal instructions, or your own delusions? God ordered Abraham to slay his own son; it was up to Abraham to reason out a compromise. All the great monotheistic religions are based on Abraham, and thus on the assertion that if God orders us to kill our own children, then we must comply! Personally, I subscribe to a religion that teaches that I should disregard any part of the religion that, after due reflection, appears wrong to me.

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    20. Re:Religion by ultranova · · Score: 1
      Any being that resorts to torture because his creation doesn't do what he wants is not devine nor perfect. Infact, it's very childish. I don't set my computer ablaze because my program has a bug. I don't insist that the program corrupted itself because I gave it the ability to be corrupt. And lastly, I don't claim to love anything then torture it when it doesn't love me back. I think I'm a better person than the Christian god, because I don't have to inflict my will on any other being. Even if Christianity is right, I don't want to have any part of that kind of "love". If a god wants me to believe or love him, giving me a book full of threats and contradiction is not a step in the right direction.

      If you're program started misbehaving, damaging other programs and the computing environment in general, you would terminate it, wouldn't you ? And if it was capable of understanding threats, you would try those first, punishments second, and only resorted to complete destruction if nothing else worked, wouldn't you ?

      So... to answer your question, just about anyone that believes in that kind of thing has to be nutcase to begin with. Rational, logical thought is at odds with the popular definition of faith (unfounded belief). Rational people don't believe in the tooth fairy. Most rational people will say there is no convincing evidence yet that there is or is not a creator.

      By this definition, there are no rational people. It is impossible to function in this world without believing it will behave in a consistent way, that is, that the rules of physics stay the same. However, there is no reason to believe they do; just because they have in the past, is no indication of future.

      This device is far, far from optimal. I don't even know if it's possible to make a smart enough device that I could trust. There would definately have to multiple vendors of said chip. In fact, I probably wouldn't trust it unless the spec was public and I could build my own.

      Yes, we all know how easy it is to solder together a computer chip.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    21. Re:Religion by j3110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1> According to Christianity, God is perfect. If God were to make the program, it would work the way he wanted to begin with.
      2> Assuming that God, like I, am not perfect, finding where one went wrong would be the first question. You don't blame the program for being faulty if you are all knowing and all powerful. You fix the problem. Fixing the problem surely isn't beyond God's power, is it?
      3> Are you completely out of your head? Believing that the current physical properties to continue is not on the level of faith. Through out all recorded history, we have never seen pigs fly. I think it's pretty reasonable to assume that pigs will never fly. Through out all recorded history (and most importantly my life) we have never seen a god. The only evidence you can dig up is a very very old book... and no two religions agree on very much at all. In fact, they disagree so much they shoot, kill, and terrorism each other and every one else.

      4> Actually it is quite easy. I've seen it done with a toaster oven. You take standard chips like a PIC, ATMEL, etc. and you solder components on them... voila, you have a circuit. They even make these handy testing tools that clamp onto the very small pins of surface mount chips. Check out some ATMEL prototyping tools. My roomate does that kind of thing all the time. Right now he is hooking atmels up to WinBond voice synthesis and recognition chips... The same kind that come in newer cell phones.

      Also, you can get nice software to design circuits and have ASIC chips made to your design. This is how watches are made. Sure it's expensive, but if I'm going to have surgery done for it, I'm not going to be skimping. You can usually get it less expensive if you happen to have a friend at an Electronics Engineering school.

      --
      Karma Clown
    22. Re:Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, not all religious people are "nutcases". I, for one, am an evangelical christian and am quite sane, I assure you.

      Catch-22.

    23. Re:Religion by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you should try practicing the critical thinking skills you actually accuse others of not having (nice touch of elitism, there, by the way.)

      Care to share where you feel I failed to do that? It's not apparent from your post. In fact, I don't see anything other than this line in your post that necessarily disagrees with what I said.

      And I'm so tired of being accused of elitism over this. I'm not elite. I don't have anything special that these people don't have. I just made different choices. It's not elitism to say that I know more about computer systems than other people I know, they could know what I do, if they had made different choices.

      And in fact, as I mentioned it's not even a simple thing. I don't blame them for their choices. Schools don't even TEACH critical reasoning anymore. If they did, we wouldn't have people voting for the morons we have in office now.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    24. Re:Religion by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      I don't really think that it's "tricking" that bothers most of these individuals, but that eventually, if implanted tags were to become popular, that it would eventually become the only method of buying and selling. The bible does mention that the mark of the beast would be necessary to buy or sell. Yeah, but for a long time, cash was the only way to buy and sell and nobody decried it as the mark of the beast.

      The mark is more likely to be akin to a drivers license. Something that identifies that you've sworn allegience, and no-one is allowed to do business with you unless you've taken it.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    25. Re:Religion by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      A very interesting interpretation, however flawed. The leaps at the end to it being connected to his faithfulness in prayer or contributing to the hat are particularly amusing. Jobs reward came from his faith, not his prayers.

      God also was not the one to do those things to Satan. Satan requested God's leave to torment job, to prove he was only faithful because GOd gave him nice things. Satan failed to do that, even though he completely ruined jobs life.

      And yes, part of the lesson is that yes, life sucks. We live in a fallen world and the reality is that stuff happens. Then comes the second part of that lesson, God knows more than us. His ways are higher than our ways, and he understands things on a level we can't even imagine, so we have no place to question His methods.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    26. Re:Religion by salemnic · · Score: 1

      You know, you're probably more right here than I am. That drivers license thing, I mean.

      I was going to respond with a right-on, as cash was the only was to buy and sell but not the only way to do a transaction, just a transaction with the majors. Bartering was and is still a valid transaction method in places, even today (I'll trade you my O/S business for a portion of your network management business, for instance), although most bartering can be converted to dollars.

      More food for thought.

      -s

  15. Credit Limit by PowerBert · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope I don't go over my credit limit again, I don't want the bayliffs coming around and cutting ou t my credit tag.

    And anther thing, how will will I show off my gold chip? Bye bye prestige ;-( Maybe I can get a gold/platinum mark on my forehead????

    1. Re:Credit Limit by isorox · · Score: 1

      Maybe I can get a gold/platinum mark on my forehead

      Jaffa, Kree!

    2. Re:Credit Limit by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1

      These Jaffas -- cake, or biscuit?

    3. Re:Credit Limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah. You're thinking in way too small categories.

      There's people that need a black rfid tag, and those people need skin transplantation. How on earth can u show off your centurion RFID if u dont have transparent skin?

    4. Re:Credit Limit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SG1

  16. We're all dooooomed by kinnell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But seriously, who is going to want a microchip embedded in their body just for paying for stuff. Apart from the odd wierdo, most people get completely creeped out by this kind of thing. There will not be a market for this, and unless some sinister government thinks for soome reason that it's worth forcing its citizens to use this technology it's just not going to happen, because nobody will use it voluntarily. I'm sure there are serious uses for this kind of technology, but payment systems just aren't one of them.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:We're all dooooomed by Anztac · · Score: 1
      But seriously, who is going to want a microchip embedded in their body just for paying for stuff. Apart from the odd wierdo, most people get completely creeped out by this kind of thing.
      And some people dream about it. Neat Stephenson had this technology in Diamond Age, except it was implanted into the hip, and used nanotech. Even if this particular tech wasn't that important, body augmentation was a serious part of the society in that book. Perhaps this is just the beginning of a trend towards that kind of future?
      --
      ~Anztac
    2. Re:We're all dooooomed by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      But seriously, who is going to want a microchip embedded in their body just for paying for stuff. Apart from the odd wierdo, most people get completely creeped out by this kind of thing.

      Currently, a very large proportion of young people choose to have things implanted into them to look sexy, get noticed, or fit in with the crowd. If you told them they didn't need to carry around a purse too, you think they'd see that as a bad thing or a good thing?

      Furthermore, when credit cards first started appearing, an amazing number of people were freaked out by them, refused to use them. In the end, I'd say they've been pretty succesful.
    3. Re:We're all dooooomed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think my wife already has our credit card embedded in her hand.

    4. Re:We're all dooooomed by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
      I am that weirdo. I'd gladly implant that chip in my body if it were proven with a sufficient degree of certainty to:
      • Not be harmful to my health
      • Not be readable by just anyone
      • Be secure enough to defend against identity theft
      A chip means no credit cards, and that makes it a bit less painful to lose my wallet. It will also cut down on this magnetophobia I am developing. Basically, for me the chip is just a matter of convenience, not some kind of an ideological platform. Of course, the health/crypto standards would have to be pretty high for me to accept this chip; currently, I doubt that this is the case.
      --
      >|<*:=
  17. People won't adapt it by quigonn · · Score: 1

    I don't think that people would adapt this. I extremely cash, because I can clearly see how much money I still have. When having the money "for real", I can somehow relate to it - it's touchable, countable, more than just a number on a display.

    Electronic money - in whatever way, be it RFID tags or credit cards - just doesn't give me the same feeling.

    The way I feel about money is also the way of many people that I know. So, what I have observed, people are generally quite conservative when it's about money, and so I don't think that RFID tags will be accepted as replacement for cash by the customers.

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    1. Re:People won't adapt it by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Your observations do not tally with mine. I carry as little cash as possible. Because the greedy banks charge shops so much for card use, I still need cash for transactions under 5 GBP, and I resent this, because it's damn inconvenient.

      I still probably wouldn't be at the front of the queue for an implant, because that just feels too invasive, and I simply don't see what advantage it brings over a normal card. But electronic money is definitely the way forward.

    2. Re:People won't adapt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That works for this generation, but what about the next one where it will be the in thing to be chipped, and they are conditioned to accept it. My parents wont use an bank machine for anything other than withdrawing cash, but I don't even think twice about doing all my bank transactions through it.

    3. Re:People won't adapt it by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Peopke said the same thing about notes when they first came in. "Don't trust them, real money is in coins you can handle, with different real values instead of paper promises".

      Paper money (I assume you don't deal entirely in coin) is as virtual as electronic money. The *real* value of a $1 bill is exactly the same as that of a $1000 bill - some reasonable quality paper and a bit of quality printing. Except that if it is a good forgery, it might not have that value. So why are numbers printed on bits of cheap paper more asy to relate to than numbers on a statement (also a bit of cheap paper)?

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  18. hmmm... it must be good... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Funny

    if the Christian fundamentalists hate it...

    1. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if the Christian fundamentalists hate it...

      They've yet to come to terms with fossils and gravity, so i'd give them a few centuries to get their puny, larval brains around anything to do with computers. In the UK the Church Of England refused to use the service Demon, because of the name! What a bunch of fuckwits!

      I think the Romans had the right idea.

    2. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by mirio · · Score: 1

      This is not just a belief of Fundamentalist Christians, but of many major Christian demoninations. Why? Well, it's state clearly in the Bible (little inference needed) that the Mark of the Beast will be on the back of the hand or the forehead and that everyone will be required to have one to participate in commerce.

    3. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by rokzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Y'ever sat down and read this thing? Technically, we're not allowed to go to the bathroom.

    4. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by ponxx · · Score: 1

      no, i think you're just under the mistaken belief that you're not a fundamentalist... You probably also believe that all gay people are sinners, and that you are not allowed to mow the lawn on a sunday... that's what i (and most non-believers) would call a fundamentalist...)

      Anyway, we'll just implant it into their feet, will that make it better???

      I can think of lots of reasons to agree with or object to this idea... religion is certainly not one of them!

      Ponxx

    5. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add the word mockingly in your phrase call a fundamentalist.

      BTW, no one will put the mark in a foot to ease the "fundies." They'll deliberately put it in the hand just to push it in their face. Remember, people will take the mark because they hate Christians and Christianity. A fair number of posters on this thread would already qualify.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    6. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by whovian · · Score: 1

      Oh joy. That is no better than a child in gradeschool having to raise his hand to go to the toilet. Yet another instance of adult power trips.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    7. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by mirio · · Score: 1


      No, I think YOU'RE under the belief that you are somehow intellectually superior to anyone who would dare to have faith in something.

      You would probably also be quick to point out that not all Muslims are terrorists (which I agree with). However you would probably be the first to call me a fundamentalist because I believe in my faith, instead of some bastardized politically correct version of it. Get over yourself.

      Fundamentalists take religion to the extreme Palestinians blowing babies up on buses, Jim Jones giving Koolaid to a bunch of folks; These are examples of fundamentalism.

    8. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by Zirnike · · Score: 1

      Where else are we supposed to read it? Especially the Song of Solomon... Now there's some good material for you.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    9. Re:hmmm... it must be good... by ponxx · · Score: 1

      from the Oxford English Dictionary:
      --
      fundamentalism
      a. A religious movement, which orig. became active among various Protestant bodies in the United States after the war of 1914-1918, based on strict adherence to certain tenets (e.g. the literal inerrancy of Scripture) held to be fundamental to the Christian faith; the beliefs of this movement; opp. liberalism and modernism.
      [...]
      b. In other religions, esp. Islam, a similarly strict adherence to ancient or fundamental doctrines, with no concessions to modern developments in thought or customs.
      --

      While i don't know your exact beliefs, i'd hazard a guess that you'd fit in this definition.

      People who blow up buses are called terrorists. They might of course be fundamentalists at the same time, but you don't have to be violent to be a fundamentalist. The important distinction is that doctrines are upheld blindly against the better knowledge or changes in customs (such as work on a sunday, evolution, acceptability of being gay etc. etc.)

      Maybe you should just accept the fact that you're a fundamentalist? It's not necessarily something bad...

      Ponxx

  19. Mark of the SOMEthing... by ddilling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know about any "Mark of the Beast" but having a chip that anyone can track, that I can't just set down? Um, yeah. Uncomfortable with that. I think my personal habits are well enough documented by shadowy figures I am unaware of already, thankyouverymuch.

    (Yes, Disney, Best Buy, etc. count as shadowy. Don't you agree?)

    --
    Mahnamahna!
    1. Re:Mark of the SOMEthing... by isorox · · Score: 1

      Yes, Disney, Best Buy, etc. count as shadowy. Don't you agree?

      No, they openly screw you in the ass, nothign shadowy about that

  20. Been there... by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...done that.

    Lenina Huxley: That is correct, money is out-moded. All transactions are through code.
    John Spartan: Alright, so he can't buy food or a place to stay for the night. And, it would be a waste of time to mug somebody. Unless he rips off somebody's hand, and let's hope he doesn't figure that one out.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Been there... by dheltzel · · Score: 1

      That movie was my first thought as well!

      I'll never forget how the "retina scan" security was bypassed. Every time someone brings up the idea of biometrics for security, I get shivers thinking about it.

    2. Re:Been there... by FuryG3 · · Score: 1

      Hey, that movie seems to be more accurate than the Bible so far...

      Revelations may have also predicted implant/tatoo transactions, but did it predice Arnold would get in office? I don't think so!

      Hmm, maybe he's the anti-christ. Eek.

  21. So what would stop... by Channard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    .. transmitting a false signal and charging the goods to someone else? Or even nastier, finding someone with money to burn, kidnapping and or killing them and removing the chip? There'd have to be some sort of security mechanism for the chip to make sure the user was still alive.

    And people actually agreeing to have these things in them? These may work some day, but I can't see them actually being in common use at any point. One to put in the same file as flying cars and pill-food

    1. Re:So what would stop... by delphin42 · · Score: 1

      The implantable RFID device would simply store a userid which would be used to identify the person in order to make a transaction. Any number of security measures could be implemented on top of it including signatures, passwords, biometrics, etc. The technology is simply a way of never losing your credit card / drivers license / etc. You'd never have to carry a wallet again. Do you actually think that a clerk at best buy is going to ring up your purchases when you bring someone's severed hand to the checkout counter? This technology is no more insecure than carrying around a wallet with all your cash / credit / checkbook in it. In fact if implemented properly it would be far more secure. It could eliminate petty theft completely. No one would steal your implant if they knew they would need your biometrics or pin to do anything useful with it. How are you going to mug me when I don't even carry a wallet?

      --
      -- Adam
    2. Re:So what would stop... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I've always said I will NEVER participate in a fingerprint as ID scenario. The day they start this is the day people's finger start getting cut off.

      When Retinal Scanners are in vogue, people will get their eyes popped out of their heads. Let them steal my plastic, I'll keep my eyes and fingers thank you.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    3. Re:So what would stop... by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      No, but I'm pretty sure the ATM machine and SmartCard e-register won't give a shit. Likewise the machines that lock and unlock doors probably won't care either.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  22. Mark of the Beast! by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    For once I agree with the fundamentalist Christians. Cranial credit card implants? What next... usb hard drives in finger tips, infrared laser eye lense replacements, 5.1 audio augmentations, keyboard tattoed onto left forearm, plug-and-play genitals,...

    All this mucking about with technology has got to stop, and I for one have started a new web site (easy payments via cranial credit cards accepted) to distribute a new "down with technology" flash cartoon.

    Uhm. WTF are those people smoking, and can I have some, please?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Mark of the Beast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My genitals are already plug and play, thanks.

    2. Re:Mark of the Beast! by rickthewizkid · · Score: 1

      Oh, so *that's* what you're supposed to do with that thing!

      -RickTheWizKid

  23. Religion and Belief by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that religion really brings out the nutcases.

    Because religion is about belief; and being a nutcase is about deranged belief.

    This is not to say that all religious belief is deranged; far from it. But nutcase belief often has something in common with religion. If I hear voices in my head, is it because of my deranged brain chemistry? Or because God is speaking to me? (Answer: God only knows.)

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Religion and Belief by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      I used to know a homeless guy who was schizophrenic who told me about the "bad men" who captured him and gave him pills that made the voice of jesus go away. He also believed the Germans were manufacturing Italians in the next county over.

      What if jesus was a highly functioning schizophrenic? :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Religion and Belief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I hear voices in my head, is it because of my deranged brain chemistry? Or because God is speaking to me? (Answer: God only knows.)

      How would I know?

      -god
    3. Re:Religion and Belief by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well if a highly functioning schizophrenic were to work a few miracles, that'll be worth paying some attention to.

      --
    4. Re:Religion and Belief by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      What if jesus was a highly functioning schizophrenic? :)
      Perhaps he, like e.g. Elvis, ended up with the death celeberty-effect. An ordinary, but very popular person, who died in (or near) the high point of his popularity, becoming a legend because of the immagination of his fans.

      Not that that would have any real importance anyway. The figure of Jesus, as the Bible describes him, has had already a hugh influence on history. And even if someone would prove that the real Jesus wasn't the son of a God, there would still be the meaning behind the bible figure.

      IMAO (In my Atheistic Oppinion) people focus way too much on the magical aspects (Gods, miracles,...) instead of the social lessons behind those. e.g. Jesus magicaly healing someone. Perhaps the real meaning would be that helping sick people is a good thing to do.

      As I see it a religiouse book is a collection of moral guidelines and rules written in SF-stories.
    5. Re:Religion and Belief by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If I hear voices in my head, is it because of my deranged brain chemistry? Or because God is speaking to me?

      Maybe you're just an earlier type of human.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Religion and Belief by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you've said ... I'd also like to add, its not like a paranoid schizophrenic has never started a religion before :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  24. Some Good Advice by HedRat · · Score: 1, Funny

    The talk about having a surgical RFID implant reminds me of some quasi-related advice I'd like to pass along. Don't EVER take your wife along when you see the doctor for a physical.

    Doctor: I'm going to need some blood, a urine and stool sample and I'll need some sperm.

    Me: Ummmm, okay.

    Wife: Why don't you just give him your underwear?

    1. Re:Some Good Advice by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      Why did you neeed sperm for a physical?

    2. Re:Some Good Advice by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Um, why do you have blood in your underwear?

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

  25. From Revelation Chapter 13: by GR|MLOCK · · Score: 5, Informative

    16: And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
    18: Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

    Now why on earth would we worry. Strange that the text actually says in the hand or forehead, not on. I wish I could read the originals as they were written...

    1. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You're quoting the King James version. The New International Version has it as:

      16: And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, Windows and Linux, to receive an RFID tag in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
      17: And that no user might buy, sell, or receive credit in the user's local currency, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
      18: Here is wisdom [goatse.cx]. Let him that understands it count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and that man's name is Bill Gates.


      Well, my memory is a little hazy -- I'm sure I paraphrased just a little bit.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by malaire · · Score: 1
      Some translate that "in", some translate that "on". I don't know enough greek to comment on this.

      King James Version:
      Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
      Rev 13:17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
      Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

      New American Standard Version:
      Rev 13:16 And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,
      Rev 13:17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
      Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.

      For those who are interested, there is a free bible-studying program (for windows) with free bible-versions, dictionaries, commentaries etc. at http://www.e-sword.net/

    3. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by perlionex · · Score: 1
      The problem with English translations is that your mileage may vary. Of course, some Christian fundamentalists might claim that the KJB is the only valid translation, but I'd beg to differ. When you're trying to look for what the writer actually said, you should really look at the original Hebrew/Greek.

      Failing which, you could look for a literal translation (ie, one that doesn't try to do the interpretation for you). Other issues like cultural nuances can also have an effect.

      Let me illustrate. The following passage is from Young's Literal Translation (YLT):

      16 And it maketh all, the small, and the great, and the rich, and the poor, and the freemen, and the servants, that it may give to them a mark upon their right hand or upon their foreheads,
      17 and that no one may be able to buy, or to sell, except he who is having the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
      18 Here is the wisdom! He who is having the understanding, let him count the number of the beast, for the number of a man it is, and its number [is] 666.
      Revelations 13:16-18


      As highlighted, it seems as if the original text actually said "upon" rather than "in."
    4. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Peyna · · Score: 1

      NIV says "on":

      16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.
      18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.

      Reviewing more version on Bible Gateway reveals that only the King James Version, the 21st century King James Version, and the Wycliffe New Testament use the word "in." All others available there use "on." (including NKJV.)

      Just kind of interesting, but also makes it hard to draw conclusions based on it.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The language of the Authorised version of Scripture is a bit cranky. Here's the New International Version, a translation (IMHO) which is a bit more scholarly:

      Revelation 13:

      16:He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17:so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name.

      You'll probably find that most of my fellow fundies are more concerned about being tagged like cattle more than the exact Beast ready(tm) location of the "mark"

      Pax.

    6. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now why on earth would we worry. Strange that the text actually says in the hand or forehead, not on. I wish I could read the originals as they were written...

      I'd say you should definitely refer to the originals (or at least a scholarly analysis thereof) before hinging anything on the semantic difference between "in" and "on".

      It's the same problem that has all the Biblical literalists convinced that the earth is 6000 years old and it took exactly six twenty-three-hour-fifty-whatever-minute days to create the universe, because Ancient Hebrew the word for "day" could be translated several ways and somebody picked "day" instead of "era" or "eon".

      Not that it matters in this case, because the meaning is clear regardless: Don't let anyone put identifying markers on, in, or up your body because they seek only to own you.

      I think that's pretty good advice, no matter how sure you are the guy putting the mark on you isn't the anti-Christ.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by fruey · · Score: 1

      So many people would like to read the originals. The originals no longer exist. Only copies of copies are what is left, and they are of course in Hebrew and not English.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    8. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by BeProf · · Score: 1

      The Greek actually says "epi". That can mean "in", but it normally means "on".

      Most modern translations render it "in".

      --
      You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    9. Re: From Revelation Chapter 13: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Strange that the text actually says in the hand or forehead, not on.

      Yeah, but it kinda blows it by assuming that poor people will be allowed to buy stuff.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Seft · · Score: 1

      So microsoft will be making them then?

    11. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by dr_zeus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The word in Greek is "epi" (as in epidermis). It is found 896 times in the New Testament, and is translated "on" 196 times, "in" 120 times, "upon" 159 times, and other variations the rest.

      Although it is interesting that the translators chose the word "in", it doesn't mean they expected the mark to be within the hand. The intended meaning was probably more like the phrase "holding a cup in my hand."

      If the author meant "within the hand", he should have used the Greek word "eso" or "en".

    12. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by BeProf · · Score: 1

      Most modern translations render it as "on", rather.

      Typing problems. ;-)

      --
      You are attempting to read sigs. Cancel or Allow?
    13. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by malaire · · Score: 2, Informative
      > Now why on earth would we worry. The reason to worry comes from Revelation, Chapter 14, where it's stated that those who take the "Mark of the Beast" will receive full wrath of God.

      "The Beast" opposes God, and everyone who supports he, or his mark, get full wrath of God. - And won't go to Heaven either (this is stated later in Revelation, perhaps not in as simple terms).

      New American Standard Version:
      Rev 14:9 Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand,
      Rev 14:10 he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.
      Rev 14:11 "And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name."
      Rev 14:12 Here is the perseverance of the saints who keep the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus.

      NIV - New International Version:
      Rev 14:9 A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone worships the beast and his image and receives his mark on the forehead or on the hand,
      Rev 14:10 he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb.
      Rev 14:11 And the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and his image, or for anyone who receives the mark of his name."
      Rev 14:12 This calls for patient endurance on the part of the saints who obey God's commandments and remain faithful to Jesus.

      King James Version:
      Rev 14:9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,
      Rev 14:10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:
      Rev 14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.
      Rev 14:12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

    14. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      New Testament originals were in greek, not hebrew, einstien.

    15. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by pmz · · Score: 1

      because Ancient Hebrew the word for "day" could be translated several ways and somebody picked "day" instead of "era" or "eon".

      I also seem to remember that the Hebrew word for God doesn't imply a gender, yet the translators chose to call God "He." Just a matter of word choice that causes centuries of social turmoil.

    16. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      I've suspected for quite some time that Bill Gates is the anti-christ.

    17. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by fruey · · Score: 1
      Well you can't even spell Einstein.

      And it's a cultural question, rather than an intelligence question, so Einstein is not a good comparison. After all, he said that anything that can be written down is a waste of time remembering, or something along those lines.

      And indeed, the new testament was written after Jesus' death, mostly by second hand sources, so it's not what I'm talking about really. I'm thinking rather more about the Old Testament, since after all more religions believe in that than both books combined.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    18. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by elcheesmo · · Score: 1

      They actually use the Greek word transliterated as "epi" which is a pretty general preposition. In the King James Version, it's translated as "on" 196 times, "in" 120 times, and "upon" 159 times.

    19. Re: From Revelation Chapter 13: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I wish I could read the originals as they were written...

      Better yet, read the previous 15 verses and see how poorly the current situation fits the prophecy.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    20. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      The New Testament books are mostly written in Greek.

    21. Re:From Revelation Chapter 13: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or of course, go for the official copy from the Church that wrote the bible, St. Jerome's Vulgate:

      13:16 et faciet omnes pusillos et magnos et divites et pauperes et liberos et servos habere caracter in dextera manu aut in frontibus suis
      13:17 et ne quis possit emere aut vendere nisi qui habet caracter nomen bestiae aut numerum nominis eius
      13:18 hic sapientia est qui habet intellectum conputet numerum bestiae numerus enim hominis est et numerus eius est sescenti sexaginta sex

  26. Lets all jump on the RFID wagon its sooo in by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does everyone and their dog suddenly think RFID is the new sliced bread? Just because its new and it does something semi cool doesnt mean its suitable for every application. With this for example its totally unsuitable! Not only is your fucking credit card number or its alternative availiable for anyone in range to scan, but now you have a bloody tracking device attached to you hand. Where-ever you go and what ever you do, if your in range of a scanner then someones got you and yes they will pretty quickly tie that innocent number to your name - "hey bob, can you help me with this box" - afew seconds later bob's hand has been scanned from inside the box and his number is sold on the black market tied to his name and address. This is the stupidest thing ive seen in years, at the very least it must be controllable so you can disable it at will.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  27. Implanted RFID chip?... by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... That'd bring a whole new meaning to "paying an arm and a leg" for something.

    Can you imagine being robbed?!!!!

    1. Re:Implanted RFID chip?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I don't want biometric identification. I would NOT feel safe knowing that the only way someone could pretend to be me would be by stealing my eyes or hands.

    2. Re:Implanted RFID chip?... by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine being robbed?!!!!

      Being robbed would probably be a more technologically advanced version of "give me your wallet". A reader in front of you, a gun pointed at you, and you're being politely asked to place your hand on the reader and transfer a balance to some anonymous account somewhere.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  28. I'm sorry it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or numbered... my life is my own.

    1. Re:I'm sorry it has to be said by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      I am not a number .. Oh, wait.. I'm 648849

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
  29. Hmmm... by salzbrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    That sounds interesting.

    It will probably make shoplifting impossible, combined with RFIDs on the products that could be stolen. The shoplifter sneaks out the store and hears a friendly spoken "Thank you for shopping with K-Mart!" message. D'oh!

    I will go now and try to get one of the readers for those implanted RFIDs. Then I will place it on a busy street and bill every person only $9.99 that passes by to close to the reader ;-)

  30. Oh great.... potential monopoly here... by Bvardi · · Score: 1

    Does this mean when I get mugged they'll be taking body parts? :) Or that instead of people using the excuse "I left my wallet at home, can you cover the bill for me?" they'll be saying "I just had a really good loofah, can you cover the bill for me?"

    It makes me a litle nervous - not quite for the privacy concerns many of the traditional tinfoil hat crowd will be worried about (which are not entirely non-valid concerns, but I don't see them as being quite as bad as they are often made out to be.) This concerns me because of the rise in things such as ATM and banking fees (Most major banks here in Canada recently started charging extra fees for using anything but their ATMS, and yanked their ATMs out of the convenience stores - conveniently leaving rebranded identical machines with a new no-name company listed on them in at least a few cases I can think of)

    When you are RFID'd and if they manage to essentially change the monetary base to an electronic one, will this provide them with a monopoly (the banks) and allow them to raise service fees for electronic transactions - since you will not effectively have any other recourse?

    Of course on the other hand - with rampant counterfeiting - this may be less of a choice and more of a necessity to move away from physical paper money that is relatively easily forged to a secure electronic transactional system.

    Well, unless it's made by Diebold anyways.

    1. Re:Oh great.... potential monopoly here... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ** When you are RFID'd and if they manage to essentially change the monetary base to an electronic one, will this provide them with a monopoly (the banks) and allow them to raise service fees for electronic transactions - since you will not effectively have any other recourse?**

      well.. i wouldn't worry about that. you can already effectively live without cash, the only places you need it are where you pay small sums or need to give money for a friend & etc. the banks effectively already have the 'monopoly' or 'cartel' on cash anyways(since they're the only places where you can get cash, however if they really started screwing their customers some consumer protection official would probably first bitch and then slap them with something, that is if you live somewhere where they have any power).

      and about fees.. gas stations around here(finland) don't like that you pay in visa electron because the transaction fee eats their profit margin(which isn't much, however, the fee was originally contracted as a % fee and that's why they're screwed now because gas has gone up in price since the contracts were made, also the new machines needed for v.electron cost). they prefer that you pay with banking card(or credit card), which is much easier on your behalf too(since you don't need to verify every transaction like on v.electron). with banking cards if you're paying anything small(under 50$) you just sign it and get whatever you were paying for. also it's convinient even if you don't have much money, and especially then, because the only bills you can get from an atm around here are 20 bills so as a student you can get frequently(monthly) in a situtation where you would need the money for food(or beer) but can't get it out without visiting a real teller at bank offices.

      of course, anybody can get a visa electron whereas just almost anybody can get a banking card(credit cards are not that common, though most have them as well but use the banking card because it's more convinient if you have the money sitting on your account, and doesn't cost anything extra). though i kinda wish there was a viable alternative for visa electron since it's fees can be annoying and most places have a seperate modem call done for every visa electron transaction(so it can be hideously slow!!! even for us others that don't use it it's fucking annoying to wait for a whiskey because some ass is paying with visa electron and the machines are stalled because they're waiting for the modem to finish up).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  31. Oblig. Simpsons Ref. by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    But one thing is certain: the RF-ID chips will soon be here. And I, for one, welcome our new subdermal overlords ... and I'd like to remind them that as a fat person with lots of surface area, I can be helpful in persuading others to get the implants and toil in their underground shopping malls ....

    --
    -kgj
  32. You should see the hate-mail ADS gets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My wife used to work there. All this embedded-RFID stuff they are doing (this isn't their first attempt) really gets the loonies worked up. And a lot of the staff is pretty creeped out by it, too, truthfully. The sad part is they ditched several PROFITABLE lines of business to pursue this RFID stuff full-time. The only thing that has been paying off is embedded ID's for pets, and even that isn't doing so hot.

  33. Almost being done by upside · · Score: 1

    Nokia is doing trials with North European bank Nordea involving using an RFID tag embedded in a mobile phone cover for payment.

    --
    I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    1. Re:Almost being done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Nokia is doing trials with North European bank Nordea involving using an RFID tag embedded in a mobile phone cover for payment.

      Yeah sure, everyone has a stupid cellphone anyway. NOT.

      I still think a "speedpass"-like keyring is the best idea.

  34. ...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by rokzy · · Score: 1

    >Or even nastier, finding someone with money to burn, kidnapping and or killing them and removing the chip

    if you're prepared to injure or kill to steal money, then guess what? YOU CAN ALREADY DO THAT RIGHT NOW!!!!

    1. Re:...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by davetrainer · · Score: 1
      guess what? YOU CAN ALREADY DO THAT RIGHT NOW!!!!

      Yes, but now the most enterprising criminals among us have the ability to glance at a crowded city block and immediately pick out the person carrying the most cash.

    2. Re:...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by rokzy · · Score: 1

      you mean previously they weren't able to tell it was the guy in the 200,000 car? and yet somehow they're going to acquire the skills to circumvent the security of an electronic method of payment?

      plus RFIDs are short range anyway.

    3. Re:...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Boy, you ARE an idiot.

      Look, kid. If you hang around long enough, you MIGHT find someone rolling up in a brand new DB7 Vanquish, but don't hold your breath. The BEST target for robbery is old people, you twit. They're far more likely to be carrying wads of cash you can jack. If you've got a scanner that can read the balances on people's chips though, you instantly know EXACTLY who has the most cash in a crowd of people and can act accordingly. And don't give me any security bullshit, either. No technology can ever be totally secure. And, funny, crime really brings out the best of the worst traits in people, so it WILL be broken by someone at some point.

      I have to ask - are you a troll, or do you actually know so little about the real world that you believe you're not spouting shit out your mouth everytime you open it?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by rokzy · · Score: 1

      well my friend drives a 200,000pound car so I don't consider it too uncommon.

      if stealing money requires you to kill or mutilate your victim you seem to think murder and mutilation will become as common as robbery, whereas I think it's more likely that mugging will become as uncommon as murder and mutilation.

      using your logic, if we put photos on the back of credit cards won't the thieves just start cutting off peoples' faces!?

    5. Re:...er, well, the usual things, dumbass by the_mad_poster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well looky there, I made a new friend.

      You're not "using my logic", you're just not using ANY logic. First of all, you can't just put my face over yours and think it's going to work. This isn't Texas Chainsaw Massacre, we're back in the real world now, Leatherface.

      Second, nobody I know of has a credit card with their face and I don't ever recall even seeing or hearing of such an option. That's what signatures are for. I suppose such a thing may exist and I've just somehow missed it in my thousands of credit card offers, but it's irrelevant because even if it does, it's OPTIONAL. Besides that, this is not an issue being discussed here, so stop stop pulling unrelated bullshit out of your ass. And, if you can't resist introducing unrelated topics, at least have the sense to make sure they're a little bit realistic before you do.

      Third, YOU have A friend that drives a 200K pound car. Good for you! Funny thing about that is that your ONE friend doesn't define normality for the rest of the 6.5 billion people in the world.

      Fourth, robbery and murder numbers are different and the fact that you're drawing some unbelievably assinine correlation between the two (especially with NO data on either of them) is truly a testament to how little content you've managed to add to this thread so far. If there are 20 robbers and 5 murderers, and only 4 of the robbers are willing to hurt or kill people to commit the robbery, that means there will be 0 robbers and 9 potential murderers. What sort of an IDIOT would give a person INCENTIVE to kill them to get their money? Your odds of being robbed go down, and your odds of being MURDERED go up. If YOU want to give people incentive to kill you for your money just fight back and leave the rest of us out of it. $20 in my wallet that I can just surrdender isn't worth a fight that could end my life, IMHO, but if you're miserable little pissant life is only worth 20 bucks to you, by all means - go crazy.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  35. New Meaning by JackJudge · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess it gives new meaning to the phrase, "It cost me an arm and a leg".

  36. The social implications make this non-feasible.. by StressGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This elimiates the anonymous purchase. No more slinking into the adult bookstore for that copy of "Wendy the Whip" Quarterly (or whatever) that is purchased with cash so it doesn't show up on your bank statement for your wife to see.
    .
    Seriously though, if you have absolute access to how someone spends their money, you essentially know everything about them. It becomes an extreme invasion of privacy making the technological hurdles somewhat minor in comparison to the social and political hurdles.
    .
    Regarding the mark of the beast; given that this is an implantable device, I can't help but find it interesting that the "number of the beast" is also the Unix mode number for universal device access. Don't know if that means anything, but it is an interesting coincidence.
    .

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  37. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure which is more disturbing implanted RFID or agreeing with people whose best explination for the dinosaurs is some supposed reference to 'bohemoths'.

  38. So you work in the Disney section of Best Buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it the Best Buy at Disney?

  39. Anything that pisses off Christians... by VaxRat · · Score: 1

    is good enough for me.

  40. Gives Identity Theft New Meaning by syntap · · Score: 1

    After all the thieves and hax0rs warRFID'ing in the mall, manufacturing new RFIDs and running up my credit with black market tags, my arm will look like swiss cheese from all the replacements.

  41. But.... by mormop · · Score: 1

    If you're not doing anything wrong you have nothing to fear citizen...

    MUHAhahahahahahahahahaha.......

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  42. Plug and play genitals? by rickthewizkid · · Score: 1

    Sounds good to me! As long as it works better than the "plug and play" in Windows 95! :)

    Just my gives-a-new-meaning-to-plug-and-play's worth...
    -RickTheWizKid

    1. Re:Plug and play genitals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't we have those already?

    2. Re:Plug and play genitals? by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but to fill the hole in the market we plan a series of upgrades that will include automatic Bluetooth device matching, high speed (USB 2.0 "full speed") transfers, and hot swapping with realtime anti-virus protection.

      Version 1.0 may crash now and then but we believe version 1.2 will be rock steady. It will also come with customisable casings, including a neon blue "shines in the dark" version. Batteries not included.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  43. Ridiculous pipe dream.. by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just another example of people who think that just because something is technically possible and perhaps even practical in some cases, that is somehow automatically considered desireable.

    Most people don't want this. Not now, probably not ever.

    Credit cards have been around a long time too.. now wouldn't it be practical not to have to lug that heavy card around?

    Why not have credit card numbers tattooed onto the card holder? That's been technically possible for a long time, and it could also be practical in some cases.

    Would anyone suggest this? Why not? Same reasons.

    1. Re:Ridiculous pipe dream.. by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Just another example of people who think that just because something is technically possible and perhaps even practical in some cases, that is somehow automatically considered desireable.

      Perhaps. But history shows that technological advances *are* in general desirable, despite initial resistance. It's a lot like advances in music. Adults in the 50's couldn't stand Rock and Roll, even as the younger generation embraced it. As someone in their 30s, I confess that I just don't get the point of Bjork or instant messaging, but such music and technology are popular among 20 year olds. Maybe people growing up in the world of sub-dermal technology will have no problem with it.

    2. Re:Ridiculous pipe dream.. by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. But history shows that technological advances *are* in general desirable

      Advances of technology in general are desireable.
      The step from there to saying that -all- new technology is in general is desireable is a big one.

      It's easy to have a skewed view of history, since the advances that tend to be remembered are the ones that did catch on and survive.

      For instance, the advent of nuclear power in the 50's lead to the predicting of some that there would be a nuclear power plant in every home. This is both technologically possible and in many cases useful, but it was not found desireable.

      For every new technology, there are far more uses that are found undesireable than desireable. And I belive this is one of the undesireable ones. Wealth is a primitive concept. People like money, as it's a tangible form of wealth. I don't think that's likely to change much over time, it's too primitive.

    3. Re:Ridiculous pipe dream.. by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      For instance, the advent of nuclear power in the 50's lead to the predicting of some that there would be a nuclear power plant in every home. This is both technologically possible and in many cases useful, but it was not found desireable.

      Well, I'd say the jury is still out on nuclear power. The real reason it didn't take off is simply that petroleum is still cheap. We'll have to see what happens when we really start to run out of oil.

      For every new technology, there are far more uses that are found undesireable than desirable

      I see no reason to assume this. Maybe this is true for scientific laws, which simply describe the universe without any concern for human good or ill, but technologies are created by people for people.

  44. Fabled? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't referring to the Bible as a fable in a /. story just trolling the Christians?

  45. Why? Why?? by Maradine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why do fundamentalist Christians have a problem with this? Every time one of the prophetic things come to pass, they're like, "my god, the number of the beast! Satan is among us! You cannot do this!!"

    Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Know Your Religion! Guess what guys? The New World Order and the anti-christ's coming are a bloody prerequisite for your savior's return. Remember that bible thing?

    You guys should be cheering this stuff on.

    --

    trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

  46. I'm conflicted.... by phillymjs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm a firm believer that anything that sends those fucking Bible-thumping loonies into a tizzy is a good thing.

    But I'm not crazy about the idea of being lojacked, because I can see the good old U.S. Government abusing such technology-- like making RFID implants mandatory for everyone, and sprinkling RFID readers all over the place, in every doorway, parking meter, fire hydrant, and other such everyday objects that people see so often they no longer even notice them.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:I'm conflicted.... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

      " I'm a firm believer that anything that sends those fucking Bible-thumping loonies into a tizzy is a good thing."

      Now, the above sentance is a case where punctuation is very important....
      .
      . ...ya'll can write your own joke from there....

      --
      A goal is a dream with a deadline
  47. High Tech crime *rejoice* !!! by curtisk · · Score: 1
    ....but RFID-enabled humans are bit harder to tamper with.

    Ummmmm.....yeah, REAL hard for traditional thieves if you don't have a knife

    And how long until they can stand in a theatre lobby, say, with a handheld scanner, screening for the "high-rollers", ready to call upon the aforementioned thugs to roll the targets for their tags? No more guessing how much money is in the targets wallet, only go for the sure-bets

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

  48. If I was to ever get one of those... by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

    ...it would have to use Chaumian digital cash. Anonymous, untraceable.

    I'd still be worried about muggers in the city cutting off my hand.

    In Soviet US, thief cut hand off YOU!

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  49. One very important difference by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now, if a mugger wants my wallet he can just take it instead of having to carve it out of my body.

    It's the same as unremovable transmitter bands for children -- ie a horrible idea. If you're dealing with someone who is willing to kill or maim you to get money, the last thing you want to do is give them a reason to have to do it.

    This is common sense.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:One very important difference by rokzy · · Score: 1

      yes, because there isn't going to be any method of you reporting the chip stolen, or the chip being declined once your dead body is discovered is there?

      I guess we should all leave our possessions outside our houses and the car keys in the ignition. If you're dealing with someone who is willing to risk gong to jail just for some material items, you don't want to give them a reason to come into your house and put your family at risk do you?

    2. Re:One very important difference by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Not all kidnappers are willing to kill or maim. There are very real differences in the repurcussions for kidnapping that does and does not result in bodily harm.

    3. Re:One very important difference by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      yes, because there isn't going to be any method of you reporting the chip stolen, or the chip being declined once your dead body is discovered is there?

      This is true for credit cards as well, but they are still stolen and used successfully before the theft is reported. This is obvious, so why be smart?

      I guess we should all leave our possessions outside our houses and the car keys in the ignition. If you're dealing with someone who is willing to risk gong to jail just for some material items, you don't want to give them a reason to come into your house and put your family at risk do you?

      You've mistaken reducing the probability of being robbed with reducing the danger of serious injury in the event that one should be robbed. Putting your stuff in your locked house reduces the chance that any slightly larcenous soul walking by will rob you. Just like having my credit card in my wallet inside a buttoned pocket inside my jacket makes it more difficult for someone to pick pocket me.

      If that isn't enough and they decide to break into my house or hold me up at gunpoint, we're past the "reducing risk of being robbed" stage. I'm being robbed. Now it's time to reduce the risk of being shot. "The only way you'll get anything out of me is to kill or seriously maim me!" doesn't sound like a good way to dissuade an armed robber.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:One very important difference by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      So, how'd that lobotomy go for you anyway? I hear the doctor didn't have real steady hands.

      The original poster already said - and if you'd have been paying attention instead of just flapping your gums in the wind, you'd know this:

      There'd have to be some sort of security mechanism for the chip to make sure the user was still alive.

      Which takes care of your first statement.

      I guess we should all leave our possessions outside our houses and the car keys in the ignition.

      And, what alternative would you suggest to keeping your keys in your pocket and your posessions in your house? Hmmm? Do you know something the rest of us don't (I highly doubt that...)? Have you been keeping your posessions in an uber-safe 5th dimension or something?

      The difference, since you can't pick this simple point out on your own, is in necessity. I don't need to put a chip in my body to perform transactions, yet putting the chip in my body gives EXTRA INCENTIVE to kill to get at my money. I don't have choice but to put my posessions in my abode, so I haven't much of a choice when it comes to a robber - they have to break into my house because I don't have a better place to store my stuff. And, of course, if I'm being mugged or robbed, I can willfully surrender my posessions to avoid being hurt or killed for them as long as the assailant didn't intend to hurt me regardless. If the chip is IN MY FINGER they have NO CHOICE but to remove the finger to get it. Nobody has to cut my finger off to get my wallet, thanks.

      Do us all a favor and go upgrade your IQ a few points before posting again.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    5. Re:One very important difference by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Not all kidnappers are willing to kill or maim. There are very real differences in the repurcussions for kidnapping that does and does not result in bodily harm.

      And do you really want to put that to the test with your child?

      Potentially reducing the overall number of kidnappings at the cost of increasing the number of kidnapping victims who return with a severed limb or outright dead doesn't sound like a good tradeoff to me.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:One very important difference by rokzy · · Score: 1

      >You've mistaken reducing the probability of being robbed with reducing the danger of serious injury in the event that one should be robbed.

      you made the mistake of assuming that if you're going to be robbed then the thief will do anything, i.e the probabilty of being robbed if all the thief has to do is steal your wallet is the same as the probabilty of being robbed if the thief has to perform minor surgery on you and then circumvent any other security measures.

      what has happened with credit cards? do the theives now mug people and murder/incapacitate them so they can't report it stolen? no. credit card fraud is now mostly either applying for a card with fake documents, or stealing the card details without the owner knowing.

      are more people physically hurt through cash being stolen in muggings or through credit card fraud?

      you can't assume muggers will steal these chips like they steal cash when they don't even bother with credit cards. mostly trying to use a known stolen credit card or chip will just get you caught.

      if you say to a thief "you can only get money off me by killing me" then 99.9999% won't do it. and the couple of psychos that actually would do it are probably the kind who would torture you for fun anyway.

    7. Re:One very important difference by MoobY · · Score: 1

      A similar thjought came to my mind. I already envision grave diggers pulling out bodies in order for them to steal the tags. Or eyeballs for retina scans. Or hands for palm scans.

      --
      --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
    8. Re:One very important difference by swillden · · Score: 1

      There are very real differences in the repurcussions for kidnapping that does and does not result in bodily harm.

      A fact well known to all kidnappers who have been to law school.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:One very important difference by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      you made the mistake of assuming that if you're going to be robbed then the thief will do anything, i.e the probabilty of being robbed if all the thief has to do is steal your wallet is the same as the probabilty of being robbed if the thief has to perform minor surgery on you and then circumvent any other security measures.

      Not at all. As you quoted me: "You've mistaken reducing the probability of being robbed with reducing the danger of serious injury in the event that one should be robbed" Yes, it is likely fewer robberies would occur. Those robberies that occured would be more likely to involve the maiming or killing of the victim. Got it now?

      what has happened with credit cards? do the theives now mug people and murder/incapacitate them so they can't report it stolen? no.

      Because they don't have to. Between when they steal it and when it gets reported stolen the thief can max out the card. And your wallet has cash in it they can use. If your only source of money is your chip, well...

      if you say to a thief "you can only get money off me by killing me" then 99.9999% won't do it. and the couple of psychos that actually would do it are probably the kind who would torture you for fun anyway.

      I think you need to look at some crime statistics in this country before you assume that only 0.0001% of criminals who commit armed robbery are willing to commit violence against you as well. The characterization of that set as "a couple of psychos" is grossly wrong.

      If you want to challenge a thief to kill you, you go right ahead. I know which one of us has a better chance of getting killed by a mugger.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:One very important difference by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      It should be pointed out that most violent criminals have their limits. Few muggers are actually openly hoping to have to hurt someone as part of their crime. It's all a game of intimidation and light battery for profit. While it's true that the really monstrous criminals will go to further lengths to hurt people for money, it will would -- in general -- cause far less people to get attacked even as it causes those few remaining attacks to become more horrific.

      Plus, even if you do carve it out of someone -- how do you use it without arousing suspicion when your own tag goes off at a transaction? There has to be a practical range limit to avoid accidentally charging the wrong person, so you'd have to hold your grisly prize close to where you'd keep your own. The lack of usefulness of the prize would also discourage attackers.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    11. Re:One very important difference by Saeger · · Score: 1
      And you just brought another thought to my mind: Battle Angel Alita.

      Droid: The laser will imprint your registration number on your brain tissue. Please hold still.

      Alita: On my BRAIN?

      Droid: Finger prints, voice prints and retina patterns can be changed. Can you think of a better way to tell one cyborg from another?

      Until we *do* have the ability to change our structure on the atomic level (with nanotech), licensed morticians would probably be required to burn the prints, retina, and RFIDs off the corpse to be buried.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    12. Re:One very important difference by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      A robber who wants to kill you at gunpoint will just shoot you. Once shot, he will take your wallet with no resistance. No "gimme your money" is required.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  50. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone tries implanting a chip under your skin, cut off that body part.

  51. Reese, Sgt. Tech-Com BN38416 by Metryq · · Score: 0

    While watching THE TERMINATOR my brother was joking about Reese passing his arm over the UPC scanner in a supermarket...

    "Can I get a price check on one soldier?"

  52. Why is it ok by howlinmonkey · · Score: 1

    to bash "fundamentalist Christians"? If anyone made these same sorts of remarks about Buddhists lighting themselves on fire because of their beliefs, they certainly wouldn't be modded as +1 funny.

    I know there are certain assumptions made about people branded with that title, but understand that there are PhD's in EE, CompSci, and other disciplines who are fundamentalists.

    Do you even know what it means to be fundamentalist? Or do you just look at the nutcases and make assumptions about everyone under that label. You know, like "Boy that (race) guy sure went nuts. You really have to watch out for those (race) people".

    It is politically, and ethically, incorrect to do this with race, it ought to be just as incorrect to do it with any religion.

    1. Re:Why is it ok by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      It's probably because of the extent that many Christians seek to impose their religion on others. I've never come across a Buddhist who insisted on trying to "convert" me. I've never met a Muslim who tried, insistantly and obnoxiously, to convert me. But most Christians I've met have insisted on trying to make me believe in God, and feel strongly that schools and other influential outlets should be pro-active in encouraging belief regardless of the wishes of the individuals involved. Couple this with fundamentalism, where not only is an average individual being asked to believe in something they don't, but in its most extreme form, and you can guess why the group puts people's backs up. For Christians it's the evangelical tradition I guess that's to blame.

      We don't complain about Buddhists because they don't have a reputation for imposition, of disrespecting other's right to disagree or disbelieve.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  53. Yeah yeah yeah... by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could rant about how stupid these things are, about all the security holes in the system, about all of the abuses, about the violation of rights, and on and on and on. Instead I'd just like to say that if it does somehow get rammed down our throats then I want chip number 666! Thankyou.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Yeah yeah yeah... by milatchi · · Score: 1

      |. ----that is the cheapest thing I have seen. hahaha!

      --
      Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  54. Dedication is a virtue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "...sufficiently dedicated thieves may try to slice the tags out of their victims."

  55. Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by thule · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a Christian, and I say bring it on! A Christian shouldn't have anything to fear! Any "body mark" that could be a *requirement* for global commerce just means that the Bible's predictions are right and the Christian can rejoice that the end is near. Yay!

    Again, why should I be afraid???

    Just to be clear though, I'm not saying *I'm* going to *sign-up* for one.

    1. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by HorrorIsland · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The return of Christ is always to be hoped for, of course. But, if it is the mark, it's still nothing to take lightly, since it means that everyone in the world is running out of time to accept Christ.

      It also means at least hardship for those who refuse to take the mark. After all, if it is the mark, it will become required for trade, and those without it will effectively be living in a perfect "trade embargo". No medicine, no food you don't grow yourself (from your own seeds!), no manufactured goods of any kind... it's hard to imagine what kind of life you could support that way. After all,even the Amish buy and sell.

    2. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      It also means at least hardship for those who refuse to take the mark

      If I remember correctly doesn't it also mean that anyone who does take the mark is damned? Then there are those left behind who didn't take the mark. They are basically screwed too if they don't do something. I forget what it is, I just remember that it was a vague description. Revelations was the only time I paid attention in church when I was growing up. The rest seemed like it wasn't even written in English as much reading into it as you had to do.

    3. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      ...running out of time to accept Christ.

      What happens to people that are born days or even hours before the end of the world then? I don't know about you, but I have a hard time communicating on any meaningful level with a newborn that can't even open its eyes, much less comprehend any human language.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      near is a relative term...near in human terms? near in God's terms or in the age of the universe? near in relation to the age of your religion?

      near could be anything between seconds and many eons.

      you should be afraid, just because the end is "near" doesn't mean those that don't accept the mark took the easy way out.

    5. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      Those who have the mark of the beast on them will not longer be able to make the sign of the cross and yadda yadda. So they're pretty much doomed because of that.

      I'm not religious, but I have to admit that I'm not going to fuck myself on this whole salvation thing over an implant... I'll use cash mmmkay.

    6. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happened to all the people who died *before* Christ and didn't even know about him? Are they all burning in hell from being born at the wrong time?

    7. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

      Revelations was the only time I paid attention in church when I was growing up. The rest seemed like it wasn't even written in English as much reading into it as you had to do.

      As surprised as some American Protestants might be at this tidbit of information, it wasn't in fact written in English. Oh yeah, and King James wasn't one of the Apostles.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
    8. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, if you read the bible you would know that he/He spent his three days in hell fighting the devil, taking away the keys and releasing all the doomed souls.

    9. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      And what happened to all the people who died *before* Christ and didn't even know about him? Are they all burning in hell from being born at the wrong time?

      For that matter, what about the poor babies who die shortly after birth? Are they burning in Hell?
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    10. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      I know it wasn't written in English. It was translated to it. However, the translation that I had seemed like it wasn't even in English. You have to spend too much time trying to figure out what it is that was being said.

    11. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people had been burning in hell for THOUSANDS of years before he arrived and organized the jail-break? Yeah that sounds fair.

    12. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Ummm.... not that I think the whole Judeo-Christian Heaven and Hell thing isn't totally illogical and ridiculous (quite frankly... why SHOULD I worship a creature that's so arrogant that the only possible thing you can go to Hell for is not worshipping it? The only unforgiveable sin? Nice to know that that thing's ego is more important than human life. Uh uh, nope, sorry. Sounds like somebody I'd rather put on my Foe list.).. but if life isn't fair, why should death be?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    13. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by FlyGirl · · Score: 1

      What happens to people that are born days or even hours before the end of the world then?

      As I understand it, those too young to have made a decision before their death are summarially accepted by Christ. So, while it sounds unjust on the surface, this is not a good "unfairness" attack on Christianity.

    14. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      What happens to people that are born days or even hours before the end of the world then?

      The Bible refers to something called the age of accountability - it's the age at which (and all people are different) one is able to discern right from wrong. Pre-age-of-accountability = no worries.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    15. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      And what happened to all the people who died *before* Christ and didn't even know about him? Are they all burning in hell from being born at the wrong time?

      Nope.

      As you probably know, there is more than one level of Hell. Those that died before the birth of Christ were sent to one level. After the death and resurrection of Christ, He went there to retrieve those sent there and take them to Heaven.

      In all honesty, the one thing that many people (including myself at one point in my past) fail to realize is that God doesn't want to punish anyone. It's a choice and time is growing nearer when people have to stop riding the fence. It's a black-and-white decision: accept Christ and have a mansion in Heaven or not. Being a good person/helping the old lady across the street/never killed anyone doesn't cut the mustard. Christianity is not a works-based religion (contrary to the belief of some cultic variations of my religion). It is only by the acceptance of Christ as your savior that salvation is attained.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    16. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a modernist approach. A more traditionalist approach accepts the idea of original sin and argues that we are all condemned save for the grace of God. This is a large part of why abortion is considered abhorrent. It condemns the unborn to Hell. No one ever said life was fair.

    17. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are. God knew that they would not accept him and smote them thusly.

    18. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by russellh · · Score: 1
      As I understand it, those too young to have made a decision before their death are summarially accepted by Christ. So, while it sounds unjust on the surface, this is not a good "unfairness" attack on Christianity.

      Ahhhh. Accepted by a technicality? so there must be a threshold, then, after which one becomes eligible for damnation. Once you can think for yourself, I guess. Interesting view of the world.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    19. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Oh goody.... I started a theology lesson.

      Christianity is not a works-based religion (contrary to the belief of some cultic variations of my religion). It is only by the acceptance of Christ as your savior that salvation is attained.

      I'm not trolling or baiting you, this is a legitimate question that to this point, has failed to provoke a reasonable, intelligent answer:

      Given the fact that this god considers its own arrogance and egocentrism more important than its people's actions and lives, why does it deserve to be worshipped? Any being that would allow an individual to be tortured for eternity who labored and sacrificed to comfort others, solely because that person did it out of the goodness of their own heart rather than a blind faith, is something I'd label enemy. I would never kneel before something capable of such cruelty and outright evil.

      Answer me then - WHY should it be worshipped if it shows such propensity for corruption?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    20. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      The only answer that makes sense from people who believe is 'fear'.

      There's the other group, though, that claims because god is the source of good, anything it does is good, regardless of how it appears to us. I find this to be stupid, as would most.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    21. Re: Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I'm a Christian, and I say bring it on! A Christian shouldn't have anything to fear! Any "body mark" that could be a *requirement* for global commerce just means that the Bible's predictions are right and the Christian can rejoice that the end is near. Yay!

      How do you know this is the prophesized Mark of the Beast rather than just another technological change?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    22. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by mark-t · · Score: 1
      It's all well and good to wish that the Christian God would just up and forgive everyone and let them all into heaven, but then what would be the point of having free will? If there were no consequences for our actions, we may as well not exist at all. Likewise, if God simply ended the existence of those who did not acknowledge him, rather than having them face eternity in hell, the end result would still be that there is not a balanced set of consequences for the choices that we make in life.

      The premise is that we have our whole lives to forge our eternity... and we are hardly in a position to complain about whatever destinies that we freely choose for ourselves when we can easily tell what the possible outcomes are liable to be.

      Anyone is completely free to say that such a god is an egomaniac if they choose... but if an egomaniac is only someone who thinks more highly of himself than he ought, and the Christian God really *IS*, in fact, who he claims to be, then how is it egotistical for him to demand worship? Isn't more egotistical on our part to assume that we can somehow ever hope to successfully forge whatever eternal destiny awaits us without the assistance of such a person?

      It may seem that the simpler idea is to just assume that eternity is a fairy tale, and once you're dead, that's it. And hey, that's a choice too... If eternity exists, it's a choice one has to live with for a very, very, very long time.

    23. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      Uh oh. You seem to be, at least partially, contradicting this guy on the whole "forging eternity" thing.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    24. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Micah · · Score: 1

      > If I remember correctly doesn't it also mean that anyone who does take the mark is damned?

      There is evidence for that, yes.

      BibleGateway search showing what will happen to those who accept the Mark and worship the image.

    25. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      "The other group" is obviously comprised completely of morons, so I'll just disregard them.

      As for fear, I don't buy that as an acceptable answer. I would think that if you fear something you should try and reconcile your fear, or, if it can't be reconciled, fight or hide from it. There are things I fear, I certainly don't offer them praise. Respect, perhaps, if only for power and influence, but not praise.

      I get the impression you're NOT a believer. I think that should automatically disqualify you from trying to answer the question! :-P

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    26. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to The "Eastern" Orthodox Church (the true Catholic (i.e. universal, not to be confused with "roman catholic") Church), God is Love, God is eternal self-giving. He is the sping of the water of life. Worshiping Him means drinking from the water of life. All that have not been Baptized will be judged not according to the Ten Commandments (as reinforced by Christ), but according to their own conscience. Those that have been Baptized will have the chance to have some of their sins forgiven. The judjement day itself will not be the punishment of the weak by some mighty oppressor, but exposure to His ultimate Love. Those with clear conscience will rejoice, the others will realize their own problems and will suffer from the Love - will exist forever in hell (which is, by definition, a state of the soul in which it is forever separated from the only source of life, the trinity of God).

    27. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God is Love, a spring of life itself. He is not a tyrant, who needs to terrorize you because you are inferior. He is not a person in the human sense, because a person means having ego. God is trinity (mutual love). Hell is a state of the soul in which you realize your own defects. In a way, it will be you who will condemn your own sins. God will simply reveal Himself to everyone after the resurrection, and show His Love. Despair is a terrible sin, because it denies the very idea that we are immortal beings being brought up with harsh lessons by a benevolent God who wishes to save us from ourselves. In fact, the original sin, which corrupted satan, Adam, and Eve, is pride, because pride is the very negation of Love (self-giving).

      Disclaimer : I may have changed the meaning of what I have read. You can google "Orthodox Christianity" for more on the subject.

    28. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 1
      so there must be a threshold, then, after which one becomes eligible for damnation. Once you can think for yourself, I guess. Interesting view of the world.
      Exactly. Once you can exercise your own free will (and free won't), then you're either working for or against God, and gaining or losing karma for it.
      --
      __CmdrTHAC0__
      In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
    29. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      I'm a Discordian. However I was brought up Roman Catholic, and spent 14 years in Hell^H^H^H^HCatholic school, so I do have some basis of knowledge. :)

      I wouldn't dismiss the 'other group' so quickly. It's actually a relitivly large group in the theology world.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    30. Re:Christians rejoice! (was: Nope.) by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      God may be lots of things, but 'love' is a big stretch. 'Hate' comes closer.

      "Hell is a state of the soul in which you realize your own defects."

      That would mean I'm currently in hell. It's a reasonable comment...

      "n fact, the original sin, which corrupted satan, Adam, and Eve, is pride, because pride is the very negation of Love (self-giving)"

      Ummm... No. 'Satan' was never corrupted, that's a bad misinterpretation of his role. Lucifer (the more correct name) is an angel carrying out god's will, to tempt people to disobey god. Your god tries to make people make a decision that will ultimatly lead to their unending torment. That is my definition of evil.

      To continue, pride isn't why Adam and Eve got driven out of the garden. God got annoyed at them because they gained knowledge, even though he placed the knowledge there. There was NO OTHER reason for that 'fruit of knowledge' to be there unless god wanted them to be tempted by it. Eventually, someone was going to take it, because that's the nature of things, especially with Lucifer helping things along.

      And if I were you, I'd look up 'The Argument from Evil'. I know enough about Christianity, I don't need a search.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  56. Implications for Muggings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1) So instead of stealing your wallet, a mugger will now cut off your arm?

    2) Solves all those problems with the police tracking people.

    3) The next step will be to require all aeroplane passengers to be chipped.

    4) Isn't this the ultimate form of slavery to money?

  57. I'm not sure which is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that Christian fundamentalists hate it or that I agree with them in this case *shutter*.

  58. Those wacky Xtians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Those wacky polytheistic idol-worshipping Xtians (full disclosure: I'm Jewish) also believed that barcodes were the mark of the beast. (I guess the "beast" is one of their many, many false gods.) Here is one of many references about what xtians think UPC codes are.

    1. Re:Those wacky Xtians... by IronTomFlint · · Score: 1
      Those wacky polytheistic idol-worshipping Xtians (full disclosure: I'm Jewish) also believed that barcodes were the mark of the beast. (I guess the "beast" is one of their many, many false gods.) Here is one of many references about what xtians think UPC codes are.

      The mods are on drugs. That's the only way that anyone could believe that this post was "Informative".

      When you're done tarring all Christians with the same brush, perhaps we can take a look at the ... "diversity" of opinion within Judaism? And then maybe you'll get the idea that it's sheer nonsense to generalize about all Christians' views on the basis of a few loonies.

      Which branch of modern Judaism is right? Reform? Orthodox? Conservative? Who was right, the Essenes? The Hasidim? Who are the monotheists? Was it your Molech and Baal-worshipping ancestors, offering their children as human sacrifices?

      Most Christians never considered bar codes to be the mark of the beast. Most Christians don't think that UPCs are the mark of the beast. Most Christians have never visited that idiot "666" link of yours, and most Christians would think its contents are rubbish.

      --
      Arrr!
  59. Countermeasures by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Assuming these things are adopted, I see a few countermeasures to avoid being "read" by scammers or govt officials.

    1. tin foil armband over the device to block reception/transmission of RFID bits.

    2. removable bracelet with multiple dummy chips that confuses scanners with too many hits.

    3. Scanner detector device that beeps when an RFID reader is in the neighborhood.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  60. What I like about cash by jeddak · · Score: 1

    is that if I'm mugged, it's at the mugger's discretion whether to let me walk away in one piece.

    If this RFID thing were to replace cash, I'd have to worry about being cut up or killed, as the thief attempts to retrieve the tag, or kidnapped and coerced into paying for stuff.

    To sum it up: with RFID, when the fool and his money are parted, so too are several of his fingers.

  61. reruns by Pompatus · · Score: 1

    I've seen this one before. Except RFID tags were replaced by blue numeric tatoos, the picture was black and white, and the narration was in German.

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
  62. Faraday Shielding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put it in a ring watch or other jewelry and have an easy way to faraday shield the chip built in to the peice and I'll think about it.

  63. Tar and Feathers is too good for them... by Detritus · · Score: 1
    You don't have to be a Fundamentalist Christian to want to string up anyone who advocates the implantation of these devices in human beings.

    The danger is that they will be "voluntary", as in you don't have to have the chip, unless you want privileges like the freedom to travel, medical care, a bank account, a driver's license and a job.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  64. What's Wrong With Cash? by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, really -- what's wrong with cash? Coins and bills have been around for a long long time, and have worked fine. Why tamper with a system that works? The systems not perfect, but it's not like I'm willing to give up my privacy and get chip implants because I can't sleep at night worrying about counterfeiters.

    This is a non-issue, except that some desperate penny stock NEEDS to make it an issue in order to stay alive. I'll stick with cash, thankyouverymuch.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  65. Privacy by rf0 · · Score: 1

    OK so having not to carry cash around is nice in prinicpal. Same as not having to carry keys or a mobile but how far should this go? It should be my choice if I want to have some for of gadget that can handel all this. Peronally I would much rather see something like a medical bracelet which could be hard to get off (To stop theft). Prehaps have an unlocking device at home.

    The basic thing is that it should be my choice of what I have on me and when. Ease of use in regard to my privacy. I think I know which camp I would sit in

    Rus

  66. Not another PIN! by scottme · · Score: 1

    While I quite like the idea of a "duress PIN", I have more than enough trouble remembering all my various PINs already, and particularly those that I don't use very often. Let's please not complicate matters by adding yet another one that I'll (hopefully) use so seldom that there is almost no chance I'll recall it in the kinds of circumstances you describe.

    1. Re:Not another PIN! by loadquo · · Score: 1

      You could do something relatively easy like adding one to each number of your normal pin(mod 10 obv) to get the duress one.

    2. Re:Not another PIN! by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Solution would be to just have two PINs and you ahve to use both them as much, you'd be randomly prompted for "PIN A" or "PIN B". Enter the wrong one, and it acts like a duress PIN.

    3. Re:Not another PIN! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      While I quite like the idea of a "duress PIN", I have more than enough trouble remembering all my various PINs already, and particularly those that I don't use very often. Let's please not complicate matters by adding yet another one that I'll (hopefully) use so seldom that there is almost no chance I'll recall it in the kinds of circumstances you describe.

      Many alarm systems currently have a duress PIN of sorts. If your alarm's entry code is 1234, entering 1235 (ie: last digit + 1) will disarm the system but will also trigger a silent alarm to the monitoring company, which then calls police, etc. It's been around for years and requires nothing additional to memorize, save the rule that you add 1 to the last digit.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Not another PIN! by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so then if i am an intellegent thief i just subtract one from the last digit and i have their real pin number/alarm code!

      maybe i should become a thief

    5. Re:Not another PIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd not only have to be intelligent but psychic, since it sets of a silent alarm you'd never know that when they entered 1235 their pin was really 1234 and they just called the cops... you'll realize when the cops burst through the door though...

    6. Re:Not another PIN! by nacturation · · Score: 1

      so then if i am an intellegent thief i just subtract one from the last digit and i have their real pin number/alarm code!

      maybe i should become a thief


      And if you're robbing an intelligent person, they would give you code + 2. Or buy an alarm where code - 1 gives an instant alarm. Then you'd really wonder which cup has the iocaine powder.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Not another PIN! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't we have an awful lot of false alarms using that system?

    8. Re:Not another PIN! by Saeger · · Score: 2, Funny
      INCONCEIVABLE!

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  67. Too early by confused+one · · Score: 2, Funny
    They're trying this too early. It'll be at least another 75 years before the masses are conditioned to allow tagging.

    At least that's what it says on the schedule I've got.

    1. Re:Too early by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but they are doing this to get the masses used to the idea. This year they will reject it with massive outcry; in ten year it will not seem so outlandish and in 50 years it will be accepted without problems and if you are one of the few that don't accept it you will be thought of as a whacko.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  68. Re:Why? Why?? by thule · · Score: 1

    Thank you! I've always felt the same way! I don't understand people sometimes. This is a *good* thing for Christians.

    I'm not saying that *I'm* going to signup for the thing, but, hey, it's a *good* sign of things to come! ;)

  69. mark of the beast by martin · · Score: 1

    I don't why Christians should condemn it, it will after all happen at some stage if you believe the Bible.

    Just because it could now happen in their lifetime I don't see the problem. Heck the prophesies from the book of Revelation could start at anytime, so they'd better be ready. hmm maybe that's it...they haven't being doing what they can to live rightly before God and believe 'they' need more time, rather than relyig on God's timing and adjusting themselves to this.

    1. Re:mark of the beast by Plasmagrid · · Score: 1

      One thing is, is that the bible states the mark of the beast would be 666 so i would think the chip would also have to have some type of ID with 666 in it.

    2. Re:mark of the beast by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

      The Christians don't have to worry about being the "chosen" one. I already put in for IDTag # 666.

    3. Re:Mark of the Beast by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      Fundie Answer:
      No one will be forced to take the mark of the beast. You will know exactly what you are doing and it will be a badge you proudly wear showing your defiance against the God of the Bible and your allegiance to the god of this world. You will have a pretty clear choice take the mark and show your allegiance to the one world leader who proclaims himself to be god or you can starve to death.

      Rev. 13:15-18
      It was given to him to give breath to it, to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause as many as wouldn't worship the image of the beast to be killed.
      He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slave, to be given marks on their right hands, or on their foreheads; and that no one would be able to buy or to sell, unless he has that mark, the name of the beast or the number of his name.
      Here is wisdom. He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six.

      As far as the MOTB being a literal tattoo on the hand or forehead, that is most likely exactly what it is. The antichrist will rule the earth during a period of war. The likelyhood that the technological infastructure to support using RFID based ecomerce will survive WWIII is pretty slim. It will probably be just as it says, a simple mark to indicate your allegiance. No encryption, No implants.

      No shirt
      No shoes
      No Mark of the Beast
      No service

    4. Re:Mark of the Beast by uradu · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, that doesn't make any sense. The people most likely and with the power to enforce something like this are political leaders, especially those leading the most powerful nations, i.e. most of the Western world. Western leaders are notorious for spouting Christian rhetoric, so the only thing they're likely to force you to do is pledge allegiance to Christian values or something, which I assume you'd have no problems with. And the only way they're likely to succeed is with wide public support, otherwise they risk civil war and jeopardizing all hope of control. Christian values is something they're likely to get public support on, personal worship or any crap like that most likely not. What or whom exactly do you imagine Bush or one of his followers to require you to pledge allegience to other than Christian Values without losing complete moral authority and credibility?

    5. Re:Mark of the Beast by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

      Based on your post it seems you don't really understand what the Bible predicts will happen in the future. That was what I was basing my comments on.

      Anywho, here is a brief rundown of the future...
      1) All true Christians will disappear instantaneouly from the Earth with no trace whatsoever. This event is reffered to as "the rapture".

      2) The world will be united under a one-world government and a one-world religion. The man who leads this movement and brings about world peace even in Israel, is the antichrist or false messiah.

      3) After 3 and a half years of peace in the middle east, He will break the treaties he has made, declare himself to be god, and begin to exterminiate the Jews.

      4) The antichrist will institute the M.oT.B. which you will need to buy or sell food.

      5) This will be a time of war and natural catastrophes unparalleled since the begining of the world. About 2/3rds of the Earths population will be wiped out.

      6) This period of turmoil on earth will last for 3 and a half years. This time is reffered to as "the tribulation".

      7) Jesus returns to the late great planet Earth. Cleans house and sets up an earthly kingdom in Jerusalem and reigns for 1000 years.

      I hope this helps make more sense of my previous comments.

    6. Re:Mark of the Beast by uradu · · Score: 1

      Dude, no offense, but this is a very proprietary and highly extrapolated view of what the Bible says. I come from two generations of theologians and do know what the Bible says and doesn't say, even if I personally don't buy into it (black sheep of the family and all). What you're listing as fact is merely the interpretation of a few Christian branches, using lots of artistic license and suspension of skepticism. There is no metion of this type of rapture, nor of the 3.5 years, nor of the 1000 year kingdom, etc. You have to learn to read a bit between the lines when reading the Bible. For example, you have no problem not taking the 666 thing literally and instead interpreting the pope's title as the number or whatever, but then you take the right hand and forehead literally, because it sounds good. A lot of Revelation has to be interpreted a lot more abstractly than that. Like the whole Armageddon thing. As far as God is concerned the people of Isreal have had their chance, the whole world is God's people now; the Jews don't hold any more special significance in God's eyes, they're just like everyone else now. So anyone looking for a final Grand Battle in the Middle East with blood up to the horses' bellies or what have you is simply barking up the wrong tree. Ain't gonna happen, regardless of the somewhat coincidental events there now.

      Anyway, this is all just roleplaying within what the Bible says, kind of like arguing about LOTR "facts"--you either stick with what Tolkien (or the Bible) says, or else anything goes. That's the trouble with religion, it's pretty much what people make it, that's why it also holds so little appeal to me.

    7. Re:Mark of the Beast by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1
      There is no metion of this type of rapture, nor of the 3.5 years, nor of the 1000 year kingdom, etc.

      THE RAPTURE
      John 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

      1Th. 4:17 Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.

      2Th. 2:1 Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto him,

      THREE AND A HALF YEARS OF TRIBULATION
      Rev. 12:14 And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.

      time (1)
      times (2)
      half a time (.5)
      total = 3.5

      THOUSAND YEAR REIGN OF CHRIST
      Rev. 20:4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

      Dude, no offense, but you don't know what the Bible says and doesn't say. Honestly, I feel sorry for you because you have been decieved by liberal theologians who are twisting God's word.

    8. Re:Mark of the Beast by ultranova · · Score: 1

      You do realize, of course, that various branches of church have had no problem in slaughtering each other, and claiming it happens in God's name ? Religious persecution was one of the reasons people were so eager to leave Europe in the first place...

      And let's not even get to crusades.

      Claiming a set of values is Christian doesn't make it. It does, however, make a very good excuse for persecution - because Mr. X comes in God's name, and anyone who disagrees with him is obviously a godless scum and should be killed. And because Mr. X came in God's name, surely he knows better than me what His rules say ? If X says it's okay to kill these people, then killed they shall be !

      Religion isn't the problem; the problem is that people have a tendency to follow whoever will release them from responsibility for their actions. It worked for Hitler, it worked for medieval church, it will work for the Beast, as well.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Mark of the Beast by uradu · · Score: 1

      I said "this type of rapture", meaning the Left-Behind-type you mentioned where people vanish in an instant. All it says it that they will be caught up together in the clouds, and in fact I believe it mentions that they will be visible to all those left behind. None of that now-they're-here-now-they're-gone mentioned anywhere.

      Regarding the thousand year reign, where exactly does it say that this will happen on Earth? Nowehere at all! Besides, what is supposed to happen after the thousand years? If Eternity is supposed to last just a literal thousand years, the last two thousand years of wretched Christian persecution seem hardly worth it.

      Your "liberal theologians" jibe is pretty amusing, since my background is probably far more religiously conservative than what you're used to. But there's a difference between picking and choosing what is conveninent, and taking it all. You might want to start with the Ten Commandmends, which according to Jesus are the most important thing. Ask yourself why you're worshipping on the day chosen by a pope to demonstrate his power over the word of God, and not on the day Jesus himself--and all Jews--worshipped on. You're breaking the fourth commandmend every single weekend.

    10. Re:Mark of the Beast by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      1 Cor 15:51

      51Listen, I tell you a mystery: We will not all sleep, but we will all be changed-- 52in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed.

      However, I do agree with you that Eschatology is a questionable area of theology. Revelation gives us a basic idea of what's going to happen, and interpreting it at a detailed level is just an excercise in futility. Even a rudimentary study of prophecy in Old Testament history will quickly demonstrate that prophecies don't always mean what they appear to mean...even to those who give them.

      And actually, Christ said the most important thing was "Love your neighbor as yourself". (And, as an aside, I'm not replying to your pope issue as I'm not catholic and discussion of their issues is a well I don't feel like jumping in right now.)

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
  70. Doh! by avendasora · · Score: 1

    Ohhhh.... Why did I sign up for instatrace?

  71. New business plan by HomerJayS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. Make portable RFID scanner
    2. Walk down crowded street
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  72. you ask me what I think? Here's what I know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Cash is king... always has been. always will be.

    Credit and transactions that are completely executed in the digital relm are fundamentally evil because they are about reducing you're freedom.

    Nevermind that funadamentalist christian crap.

    I suppose it all boils down to just much control you're willing to hand over to the powers that be. Everyone assumes that complete transparency is a good thing (as some of the SiFi writer have written rosely about). The fact of the matter is that there is someone out there who thinks, you're not paying enough tax, or you're too sick to be in their healthcare system or you need to buy more of their brand-x product that you don't need... the list really is endless and their version of reality will be projected onto your life as some very basic fundamental level once completely digital transactions become ubiquitous.

    Me? I'm completely for freedom as long as it doesn't infringe on my physical space and/or well-being. That means privacy. The privacy you need to smoke pot in the your own home. The privacy you need to buy your pain killers. The privacy you need to crack open a beer and watch the game while cooking burgers in the back yard (oh, wait, you don't need privacy to do that any more).

    So, go ahead and get that implant. Opt-in for convience and good wholesome living that a proper citizen gives to society (or whatever bullshit help you to sleep at night). Just don't come crying to me when you're healthcare system ejects you because a routine lab test required for your driver's license flags you as having an expensive to treat disease.

    Opt-in for freedom and just say "know" to tracking, demographics and the completely digital lifestyle.

  73. Who will give me a new finger? by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What encryption? RFID as it stands has no challenge-response, it's just a static barcode readable by radio interference. When my number is stolen, do I get a new government-sponsored surgery to change numbers?

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re: Who will give me a new finger? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > What encryption? RFID as it stands has no challenge-response, it's just a static barcode readable by radio interference.

      Maybe they could encrypt it with ROT-666.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Who will give me a new finger? by MKalus · · Score: 1

      More interrestingly: How would you proof that it was stolen?

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  74. Reality check... by tibike77 · · Score: 1

    "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or numbered... my life is my own."

    The italics part is the only part that holds a bit of truth in it...
    The day you are born, you ARE pushed, then filed by your parents (birth certificate, which is... umm... stamped?), you are breiefed by the said parents (usually) until a certain age... the de-briefing part is usually done by your spouse each day you come from work (assuming you're a man)... and I won't even start talking about "numbered"...

    Get back in line, number 7567610 ! :P

    --
    By reading this signature you agree to not disagree with the post you just read.
  75. It is simply Identification by 4ginandtonics · · Score: 1

    You guys seem to be getting hung up on the money thing. The real issue here is identification.

    Identity theft is a problem, as we all know. This is just another way to counter-act that.

    I use an RF ID tag to buy gas now. The Mobil Speedpass is very handy. But easily stolen.

    Easily stolen like your credit card, credit card number, password, ssn... etc etc.....

    Instead of injecting technology into the human body, why don't we just apply the human body to technology as a means of identification?

    Biometrics

    Anyone remember Gattica?

  76. Ouch! by Cee · · Score: 1

    Just imagine getting mugged...
    "Don't try anything smart, we're just gonna cut that RFID out of you."
    I'd rather have someone take my wallet.

  77. What about kidnapping... by romcabrera · · Score: 1

    ...gangs getting in the business of cutting your fingers off your body?? I'd rather have my money picked out of my pockets than a piece of my body (or all my body)...

  78. Re:you ask me what I think? Here's what I know. by MrPink2U · · Score: 1

    C'mon. You don't really believe that they would use this technology in a bad way do you?

  79. There do exist some points of agreement by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it must be good if the Christian fundamentalists hate it

    Yes, I know that the median Slashdot user is more much more liberal than the median devout Christian. On the other hand, I've observed that Slashdot users do seem to share quite a few hatreds with devout Christians. For example devout Christians hate murder, and devout Christians hate rape. Devout Christians hate The Walt Disney Company, admittedly for different reasons than Slashdotters do.

    1. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by rokzy · · Score: 1, Troll

      >For example devout Christians hate murder,

      but didn't have much to say about Hitler did they?

      >and devout Christians hate rape.

      wow, such high principles. doesn't apply to not getting 14 year olds pregnant with the "son of God" though...

    2. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by ponxx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > For example devout Christians hate murder, and devout Christians hate rape

      Well, there appear to be lots of devout christians trying to apply the death penalty to as many people as possible... And i you have to invoke your christian faith to realise that rape is wrong, then there is something seriously wrong with you! Like, if it said in the bible rape was ok, would you do it???

      Ponxx

    3. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure that Hitler was a devout Christian. After all, the NAZI's subverted religious institutions in Germany and one of the victims in The Night of the Long Knives purge was the priest that took dictation from Hitler for part of Mein Kampf while Hitler was in prison.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    4. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it said that rape was ok in the bible it would most likely be socially acceptable at this point, as most of our societal rules have some roots in organized religion.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    5. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by rokzy · · Score: 1

      yes but the pope refusing to condemn Hitler over the holocaust wasn't their greatest hour.

    6. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      I hardly see how the actions of the pope reflect on the level of devoutness of Hitler.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    7. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by FictionPimp · · Score: 0

      "Christians hate rape" Catholics dont though :-p Sorry couldn't resist.

    8. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Lonath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>For example devout Christians hate murder,

      > but didn't have much to say about Hitler did they?

      > >and devout Christians hate rape.

      >wow, such high principles. doesn't apply to not getting 14 year olds pregnant with the "son of God" though...

      You forgot about the

      UDAP.

      Uniform Distribution of Assholes Principle: Assholes are distributed uniformly throughout the population.

      Therefore, given a large enough group, that group will have some assholes. Assholes are generally louder and more obnoxious and try to troll people who aren't part of the group, so you notice them more when you're not in the group. Most fundamentalist Christians are perfectly ok. There are some assholes, simply because there are lots of fundamentalist Christians.

      Not understanding the UDAP is the reason why so many people attacked Islam and Muslims in the US after Sept 11. They think that because some Muslims are assholes, all Muslims are assholes. When in reality, it's just that some of the Muslim assholes are now coming after the western world instead of causing trouble at home. It would be like saying that all Americans are evil if people like Timothy McVeigh had gone overseas to attack other countries as private citizens.

      The UDAP can also be generalized to the UDFP: Uniform Distribution of Flaws Principle, which states that flaws in the human character are uniformly distributed throughout the population. Therefore, stereotyping works because given the statement "All (Group) are (Flaw)." There will be a member of group Group that has flaw Flaw, and in fact the listener may have observed this on one occasion (since flaws are pretty common. :)) and may be more likely to believe the stereotype.

    9. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by rokzy · · Score: 1

      do you see how the pope (a Christian and God's voice on Earth) refusing to condemn Hitler (a mass murderer) doesn't reflect well on Christians as people who claim to oppose murder?

      do you need some sort of diagram or a version that uses phonetic spelling?

    10. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      It's also incorrect to reflect on Christians based on an act of the pope. The pope only represents the Catholic faith which is one brach/form of Christianity. You'll find very few Church of Christ, Baptist and other reformation based demoninations that give the pope much credence at all. The way Christian is being used here is in a very general form that doesn't reflect the various beliefs held by all the subsets.
      DISCLAMER: I am a member of the Church of Christ.

      --

      This space for rent.
    11. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "wow, such high principles. doesn't apply to not getting 14 year olds pregnant with the "son of God" though..."

      Wow, you sound just like one of those devout atheists. True fundamentalists! Any particular sect you belong to?

      --
    12. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, such high principles. doesn't apply to not getting 14 year olds pregnant with the "son of God" though...

      Exactly. This was the beginning of their whole obsession with making sure that women don't get to make choices about their reproductive functions. After all, if "impregnate without asking first" was good enough for Mary, it's good enough for the poor girls that get knocked up by rapists.

    13. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. Slavery and unequal treatment of women are both given tacit support in the New Testament. The Apostile Paul tells slaves to be obedient to their masters in Eph. 6:5-9. instead of telling them to free them and tells us that women are to be subordinate to men in 1 Cor. 11:13 & Eph. 5:22-23. Also, if you go futher back, Exodus 21:20-21 allows a slave owner to beat their slave, but not to death, unless the slave takes more than a day to die from the injuries. Anti-abolitionists often used the Bible to justify slave ownership.

      However, modern society has abandoned both slavery and the idea that women are inferior to men without the Bible having told us to do so. I see no reason to believe that rape would not have suffered a similar fate, even if the Bible openly encouraged it. The women's rights movement might not be where it is today when working against that kind of oppression, but I doubt rape would be accepted considering how few other religions around the world accept it.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    14. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1
      You don't seem to understand that the pope, in reality, had his hands tied by the axis powers, which allowed him to keep his post (and allowed the RCC to keep Vatican City) at their convenience. If he had become a thorn in their side he would have had an "accident" and it would have been seen to that his replacement would have been more "supportive". "The [NAZI] government encouraged anti-Christian pagan movements, in worship of the old Teutonic gods, but nothing was sponsored so much as Nazism and its Fuhrer. (Palmer et al. 795)" Source Cited: Palmer, Colton, and Kramer.
      • A History of the Modern World
      . (c) 2002 McGraw Hill. New York.
      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    15. Re:There do exist some points of agreement by evbergen · · Score: 1

      AFAIR Paul doesn't tell women to submit to men (in general), he tells them to submit to /their own/ men.

      It doesn't say anywhere that women should have a subservient position in society.

      --
      All generalizations are false, including this one. (Mark Twain)
  80. Revelations by ClubStew · · Score: 1

    Anyone read Revelations from the Bible? It talks about such a thing as yet another sign of the end. I'm not going to run out and get myself a couple of boards with some shoulder straps and paint "THE END IS NEAR - REPENT" like the guy on Stephen King's "The Stand", but it is bad nonetheless. Leave it to our government to even consider it.

  81. Revelation Chapter 13:17 by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    "And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

    ... and they don't take American Express...

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:Revelation Chapter 13:17 by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      You owe me a new monitor to replace the one I just fried with coffee...

      Just be glad I wasn't using my laptop.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  82. stop Nazi US early on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Hitler made all Jews wear badges and then they were required to have ID numbers tatooed on them so he could easily track them and send them to concentration camps and into the gas chambers.

    We certainly do not want to pave the way for anything like. Let's stop Nazi tactics in its tracks before it is too late because you never know what type of government we will have in 10 years from now. Let's fight abuse of RFID tags and make it clear to those companies that we, the people, will not accept abuse of technology.

  83. it's not all doom and gloom... only about 90% by rah1420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "time to call the doctor." Come on. They just set up a new translation table. Or you change your PIN.

    PIN?

    You damn right. It's sheerest folly to think I'm gonna let a vending machine nick me for a pop without entering a PIN. Security is something you possess and something you know. This is breaking the most fundamental (no pun intended) tenets of security based transactions.

    Not to mention that I could be persuaded that The End Times Are Near as well, but I don't go into a Frothing Fit every time some invasion of privacy rears its ugly head.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    1. Re:it's not all doom and gloom... only about 90% by aGuyNamedJoe · · Score: 1

      What? You don' t like the capability for each vending machine / sales terminal you pass to quietly extract a toll for passing, without interrupting your thoughts?

    2. Re:it's not all doom and gloom... only about 90% by elton247 · · Score: 1

      I picture a minority report situation. Instead of scanning the eye, the rfid is scanned, then a beam of sound in shot into your head, a personal ad is played. Now imagine walking through a mall.

      --
      How strange it is to be anything at all
    3. Re:it's not all doom and gloom... only about 90% by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Security is something you possess and something you know.

      Not all security. Sure, the best security is a combination of something you have, something you know, and something you are, but not all applications require all three.

      For instance, current vending machine security is solely a matter of something you have - cash.

    4. Re:it's not all doom and gloom... only about 90% by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      That's because they don't care who you are, they just want the money. Thus the other two are irrelevant. Applications where the persons identity matters require, or at least should require, as many of them as possible(remote logins can only require something you know, and in the case of accept only certain IP addresses, something you are).

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
  84. No way in hell... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Even if this were the most innocent use of technology today...

    chipping yourself is not only placing trust in the powers that be, but in all future powers that be, that this technology would not be abused...

    no thank you.. not now not ever.

  85. Re:Why? Why?? by Astatine210 · · Score: 1

    Guilty conscience on their part, I suppose. When you've been yelling "only I truly know what Jesus wants, so do what I say", the last thing you want is the Son of God turning up and saying "Well, what I actually meant was..."

    On a slightly less jocular note, the power over people that gives those Fundamentalists the power trip they crave relies on an (apparently) imminent apocalypse. Take the sense of impending doom away from their followers and you'll take away a fair portion of their power.

  86. all else aside by mlush · · Score: 1

    How rugged are these things? I would not like have one implanted every time I stand next to a radar gun. Or some joker decides it would be fun to spray a crowd with a HERF Gun

  87. Or, perhaps your crotch... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Yea, I got your money right here (grabbing crotch).

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Or, perhaps your crotch... by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine paying a prostitute that way?

      --
      Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
      http://www.tsanewsblog.com
    2. Re:Or, perhaps your crotch... by thetaikung · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine paying a prostitute that way? No, I can't.

      --
      P226 .40cal
  88. This idea has already failed by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

    The stock value of this company is down to something like 40 cents from the $14+ range and is going to be delisted. The market has ALREADY voted.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  89. What is the advantage? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ATM cards require confirmation in order to protect the contents of your bank account from someone who may have stolen or cloned your card. Credit Cards require a signature to ensure accountability and traceability. What do RFID tags do that makes them fundamentally secure?

    Nothing, apparently. Not having to type in numbers or sign a receipt are touted as the advantages of the new system. Yet traditional cards could have easily forgone the secondary identification, simply by sacrificing the security we have come to expect.

    By the proliferation of universal garage remotes out there, and RFID's lack of a challenge-response system, it's obvious that if you will be able to get within 3 feet of someone you can steal their identity without their knowledge. Without the secondary identification, the system is useless. With secondary identification, it's a credit card.

    Furthermore, why implant? Everyone has to have their keys with them at all time... The speedpass route seems like the more intelligent and flexible way to go. Implanting could be convenient once all of the bugs are hammered out and it is accepted as a universal form of payment, but for a 1st generation technology likely to be upgraded quickly, why commit?

    This reminds me a lot of the Dot Com days, when people attempted to sell anything that was possible, without even bothering to think if it should be done.

    1. Re:What is the advantage? by gregmac · · Score: 1
      Nothing, apparently. Not having to type in numbers or sign a receipt are touted as the advantages of the new system. Yet traditional cards could have easily forgone the secondary identification, simply by sacrificing the security we have come to expect.

      Well, you have to remember:

      Security = 1/Usability

      --
      Speak before you think
    2. Re:What is the advantage? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Credit Cards already do forego the additional security for many purchases. I don't need a signature when I buy gas. I don't need a signature when I buy from the grocery store at the self-checkout line. I don't need a signature for the vast majority of online purchases. You're right that this isn't going to do any more than replace the credit card, and I totally agree with you that implanting is ludicrous, but as a replacement for the credit card it does have its advantages, since it doesn't have to be swiped.

      Now to be really useful you'd need an active system. Embed a private key, PGP signing hardware, and a battery, and now you've got a system that can be used for fairly high value transactions. I'd still want to keep it on my keychain, though. Though if you embedded it I guess you could get rid of the battery and just have it suck energy right from your body. Heh.

    3. Re:What is the advantage? by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

      The advantage is not there, as you say.
      Next step, add something like Kerberos.
      To really fit the bill, verification will require non-repeatable encryption, end-to-end. One day the implants will have enough memory and processing power to do that. Then they will be almost:
      - unstealable
      - unloseable
      - unlendable
      - unforgeable
      - untappable

      Note I said almost.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
  90. an end run around visa/mastercard? by *weasel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    honestly this just sounds like an end-run around mastercard/visa's payment monopoly (they were found guilty btw, it's not just an accusation).

    if a new company owns an entirely new piece of hardware to facilitate purchases, then businesses must buy a new scanner to read it, and pay for a new service to verify transactions.

    and of course this service provider can then parlay this into a new service for medical and financial centers, to ensure patron identity at time of service, and provide an ideal unique identifier for records management.

    but that's why this sits opposed to a simple proposal to extend visa/mc by associating their RFID chip and a PIN to your existing credit account. that would doubtlessly be easier, but less profitable.

    personally, i dont consider it any sort of an invasion of privacy, because it's an opt-in service. if you don't like it, you don't use it.

    though one or two more 'incidents' on US soil, and I can easily see a certain liberty-leeching Ashcroft pushing for an 'update' to the Social Security and National ID Card systems to include this sort of technology.

    but it's that kind of app that's an invasion of privacy, not an optional payment system.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  91. NExt Scam... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    implanted Palm Reader, loosy bar and "old drunken pal" or "pretty underlighted hag" will be holding your hand all night long 8)

    Also, a politician on campaigncould stike it big if he's well known ("Shake hands with your president/gvernor/sheriff, only 12$54+vat, direct transfer and offical, frame bound receipt for the home")

    Missing Fingers also a must.

    The problem with Auto-Micropayment is the confirmation you must give. say, as an additional code type in, to really confirm you wanna pay. wich I already do with my card, wich is already a chip. (EU 8p)

    We don't need it. But the, cattle Herding on large areas need this to locate and track cattle; with a big receptor covering miles. Keep the industry concentrate on cattle. And remember your not a lamb.

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  92. another spooky application by btharris · · Score: 2, Insightful

    since everyone would have a unique number (i assume), it could help identify corpses in a graveyard or morgue, or at the site of some horrible accident where the body is otherwise unidentifiable.

    who would hold and control the databases that link these numbers to identities? this is an important question.

    i wonder if the numbers would be recycled like social security numbers. i can see websites popping up now that help you locate your numerical RFID relatives. wait, i better patent that now!

  93. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by Plasmagrid · · Score: 1

    Would you mind telling me more about this 'Unix mode number for for universal device access'

    plasmagrid@yahoo.com

  94. Don't worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure every chip will contain the bit pattern 666.

  95. Christians? WRONG! Remember the Jewish Holocaust. by StandardCell · · Score: 1

    Remember how every Jew going to concentration camps in WWII had a number tattooed to them? I've seen these folks at a local supermarket near a Jewish community here in Edmonton. It isn't pretty, and the way these people speak they wouldn't speak in too flattering a manner. I'm sure the processing at concentration camps would've been much more "efficient" if the Nazis had RFID tags. I'm also certain that there are other examples throught history where mass murders and the tracking of individuals for control purposes would've been better facilitiated by RFID (e.g. Josef Stalin, Mao Tse Tung).

    There are a lot of people who wouldn't want any tag like this attached to them even if it is "anonymous" (famous last words...). What it more sounds like is that yet another anti-Christian want to take another cheap swipe at Christians for no good reason. There are real reasons not to have RFID that have everything to do with privacy, security and even history.

  96. Re:Why? Why?? please no! ;) by danharan · · Score: 1

    They are already cheering on Israel to accelerate the second coming. (clarification: I think both Israel and Palestine have bloody hands in this conflict, and I support groups that would allow both to exist peacefully). Such a violent attitude only makes it more likely that those RFID tags will be used for big-brother type surveillance.

    With idiots that can believe a book with literal contradictions can be absolutely and literally true running around trying to promote policy, you know the execution is going to be fubar. The best we can hope for is that they are NOT at all involved with RFID tags.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  97. validate urban legends with this? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    'they put the rf tag just over my kidney and while I was sleeping somebody cut it out!'

    I mean really.. this is silly. In an age when in big cities you need to be concerned with atm and other card theft at teller machines, how long before we see the stories about
    forced extraction?

  98. Applied Digital Solutions AGAIN? by mikerich · · Score: 1
    This company seems to grab inordinate amounts of air time and publicity for no actual product. Every few months, ADS pops up and issues a press release along the lines of:

    'Soon you'll be able to use an implanted chip to [FILL IN EXCITING GEE_WHIZZ TECHNOLOGY WHEN YOU GET A MOMENT]. Applied Digital Solutions will shortly announce [CAN YOU GET THE GUYS IN MARKETING TO THINK OF SOMETHING SNAPPY?], a whole new generation in personal security.'

    The company sounds like its on a scam, perhaps the venture capital is running out.

    Is there any chance the people at ADS can be implanted with microchips that will set off alarms in all news bureaux when they make a press release?

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  99. Not that new an idea... by aaaurgh · · Score: 1

    ...if you think about it. Both our cats had to be 'chipped' before we could bring them with us to Oz (over 8 years ago) and it's often been a point of discussion about how humans could so easily be chipped too, suggestions being the mentally challenged, certain criminals, etc. The only real difference here is the detection range of the technology - the cats' scanner has to be within inches to identify the chip (10 hex digits).

    The real big issue is it's RFID, given the high profile it's getting in the media just now. At the end of the day, you can already be tracked by all sorts of passive measures (credit card transactions, ATMs, etc.) - this is just a bit more in your face (literally). Besides which, it would be a bugger when the eftpos went down and they had to stick your head/hand/whatever in the manual paper imprinter!

    --

    Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
  100. Re:Why? Why?? by gillbates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, we welcome the Return of the King. But we would hate to receive the "mark of the beast" and be denied entrance to the Kingdom.

    According to one interpretation of Revelation, when these things occur, though, Christians will be persecuted in a way that will make the Holocaust seem like a fairy tale. Then, after the tribulation, the faithful will join Christ in his Kingdom.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  101. my prediction by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My prediction is that all the fundamentalist Christians that decry this as the mark of the beast will be ignored, mocked, and or maybe even harassed/persecuted for their stance on this (if it ever comes to fruit mainstream).

    Then, once it's become the standard for commerce, all trade will be outlawed with anything but these tags. Anyone without one would be a terrorist, right?

    And then the government uses the tags and the respective databases and equipment to monitor and track anyone that they deem as 'suspicious'.

    I can't believe that people actually see this as being a contrived possibility, considering all the shit that's flying about, and all the freedoms that the government -and- large corporations are trying to take away from Citizens (or are we Consumers?).

    Armageddon, Mark of the Beast/666 or not, this is a Bad Thing. This falls under the blanket of the philosophy that any sacrifice of freedom for safety (or convenience) will rightly result in the deprivation of those freedoms from those that do not care enough to defend them.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:my prediction by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Actually, their fundamentalist christian leaders won't give a shit. They aren't real christians, they do what they want and use god to justify it.

      One can contort scripture to justify just about anything. The greatest diety of the right is the almighty dollar. No god shall come before it.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  102. Revelation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revelation 13:17
    and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.

    Revelation 14:9
    Then another angel, a third one, followed them, saying with a loud voice, "If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand, he also will drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is mixed in full strength in the cup of His anger; and he will be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb.

    Revelation 14:11
    "And the smoke of their torment goes up forever and ever; they have no rest day and night, those who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name."

  103. The state of security on these things ^n by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing they're looking at the success of Speedpass and FastLane devices and continuing the argument to its 'logical extreme'. First it was 'bring the cash', next 'bring the proxy for cash' then 'bring something / know something' - have the proxy/card and know your code. That's a successful model because stealing a atm/debit card isn't enough - you have to have the thing that's (supposed to be only) in the owner's brain. If they hold you up for cash, it's gone. If they hold you up for debit/credit, a phone call with your last bill in hand stops them cold within very short time. When my house was robbed, they didn't take the cards in plain sight. Too easy - i knew they were missing. When a local restaurant started photocopying cards in the back room, no one knew until it was after the thefts. The credit card model - where you can use them without knowing anything - is in need of revision - adding a pin would be good - the CVN system is too easily foiled with trivial methods.

    If the key is my retina or my fingertip, I can bring you on a tour of neighborhoods where you would soon check over your shoulder at the atm for someone approaching with a knife or a grapefruit spoon .

    Speedpass works well because you now simply bring something - tag, watchband, etc.. and you're buying a tank of gas or a bag of snacks or a car wash - if you lose it you'll see that soon (it's a personal item) and the damage will be minimal (unless they stand at a mobil station and make a sign that says 'free gas!' - in which case one would hope the attendants would call someone...)

    So for small payments it seems like a good solution - they're testing it at Stop&Shop supermarket in Boston - i'd be a little wary-er about this - you can load up a cart with dvds and lobsters and swipe and go...

    The speedpass watch is nice because it's innocuous - the owner knows it's a speedpass, nefarious persons think it's a cheap timex. That seems better than the speedpass itself - easily identified and take-able.

    The iButton model is also enticing - it's a piece of jewlery, and to a potential thief, it's like the final scene in the 2nd thomas crown affair - you'd have to go after every piece of jewelry in sight to get a live one. Until of course they're ubiquitous.

    It really is a fox hunt - and until it's tested, you aren't going to get people wanting this without knowing the unintended consequences...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  104. You just might get it, more or less... by rkischuk · · Score: 1
    I could rant about how stupid these things are, about all the security holes in the system, about all of the abuses, about the violation of rights, and on and on and on. Instead I'd just like to say that if it does somehow get rammed down our throats then I want chip number 666! Thankyou.


    One interesting thing about it all - if they use the general encoding scheme used for UPC bar codes, we'll all have something close to a 6-6-6 on us, though not exactly.

    If you look here (cached because howstuffworks.com seems to be flaking out), you'll see that a UPC bar code has a start code, some data, a middle code, some data, and an end code.

    Each digit is represented by a set of bars and spaces - 6 is represented by 1-1-1-4, 2 thin bars, close together, followed by a long space. It is the only digit to have 2 thin bars separated by a 1 unit space. Interestingly, the start code (1-1-1), middle code (1-1-1-1-1), and end code (1-1-1) are all 2 thin bars, close together, so if you just look at them, they look very much like an encoded six.

    Point is, get yourself a UPC bar code based ship, and you're pretty close to that 6-6-6 you've been hoping for.
    --
    Seen any BadMarketing lately?
  105. I am non church going catholic who condemns it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been to church in years, but I will sooner cut out of hands than let them implant anything in them to facilitate commerce.

    "And no one will be able to buy or sell without the mark"

    That's all I need. But seriously, Biblical implications aside, do you really want Big Brother to know how much weed you smoke? How much porn you buy? Some things are better in cash.

  106. Worthy of non-biblical condemnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I find the concept of tagging human beings like animals to be repugnant. And anyone who desires that sort of power over fellow human beings is insane.

    1. Re:Worthy of non-biblical condemnation by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had mod points....

      Credit cards and Social Security numbers are one thing but tagging someone like this just goes way too far from losing individual independence and freedom.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Worthy of non-biblical condemnation by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      This is slightly off-topic here... But have you all noticed how all these companies are getting people to basically submit to tracking every purchase they make? Best-Buy cards, Kroger cards... Every purchase you make goes into a huge database tieing it specifically to you. A lot of people don't realize this or worse yet don't mind because it saves them ten cents on a bottle of mustard. I think that if monetary incentives were given, people would line up in groves.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    3. Re:Worthy of non-biblical condemnation by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      Also with credit cards too.

      But that is not so bad as getting physically tagged. I could stop using cards, or start spelling my name differently.

      I might have to move, which is bad, but not as bad as getting something under my skin and getting tracked at anytime, any place.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Worthy of non-biblical condemnation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people would. Would find a convienent justification for being violated in such a manner.
      Not much different than being willingly and unnecessarily enslaved by debt.

  107. people tracking by orcus · · Score: 1

    The last thing people should be concerned about is some fictitious mark - what should be triggering flashing lights and warning sirens is the incredible potential for abuse!

    The heck with some sort selling rfid enabled clothing, with implantable rfid chips the government would finally have a dream come true - allowing them to track the populations movements.

    1984 is paradise compared to this nightmare.

    --
    First they burn books, then they burn people.
  108. Heh heh heh... by MukiMuki · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but the exact line of thinking is already embedded within our own government.

    I mean, I even recall a well-known senator once saying, in stark contrast to your own post, "I am... A MACHINE."

    Now, how creepy is that?

    1. Re:Heh heh heh... by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

      I even recall a well-known senator once saying, in stark contrast to your own post, "I am... A MACHINE."

      I thought that was the governor of California....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  109. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  110. Re:Why? Why?? by swordboy · · Score: 1

    Every time one of the prophetic things come to pass

    Correction - that should read:

    Every time one of the prophetic things come to Speedpass

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  111. Mohammed by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    What if jesus was a highly functioning schizophrenic? :)

    Mohammed apparently experienced altered states of conciousness:

    "He was drawn to solitary contemplation, and he often experienced visions, some violent and disturbing. Some modern scholars have theorized that he was epileptic."

    Link

    --
    -kgj
  112. Into my cold dead hands. by pmz · · Score: 0


    1) What happens when it is obselete?
    2) How many people will get infections at the implant site?
    3) How long until every doorway and chair at a person's workplace has transducers in them tracking employees at an unprecedented level?
    4) When it is cracked, what then?
    5) How does this fit into the Fourth Amendment?
    6) How about the Fifth Amendment?

  113. I've got a bug up my ass to go shopping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    but I'm feeling spent and if I buy one more thing I'll be worthless.

  114. Ever been to a ELF rally? by iceperson · · Score: 1

    I guess you haven't seen the protesters down in Florida or the ones a few years ago up in Seattle? Liberal extremists are just as nutty as Christian extremists (if not more so.) The real difference lies in causes. People from the Earth Liberation Front will burn car dealerships because they believe it will somehow stop "global warming" while Christians fight to give every man, woman, and child "everylasting life".

    1. Re:Ever been to a ELF rally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was too busy at the A.OUT rally down the street.

      Sorry.

      (*badamp tsst!*)

  115. Superb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send in your arm to pay on-line!

  116. can of chips, bag of worms by ThosLives · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Where to begin on this one? Of course people are going to start spouting religious issues with something of this nature. Of course the average joe is going to be like, "uhh... what?" Of course some people are going to be like, "cool! I always lose my change anyway - I doubt I can lose my (body part)." There are so many really large issues with this, so many emotionally charged issues, that we should really step back and figure out what's going on.

    First we must ask ourselves why people are even considering such technology? Is it convenience? Is it something else? The proponents of this technology tout things like security and convenience. The security is for those who want power - they want a way to know where the people who can threaten them are. I'm not talking about with weapons, either - I'm talking about with power, with ability. They attempt to get more mechanisms of control into society oh so subtly by making it "convenient" to do things. Think about this though - is it really faster to pay by credit card like the commercials say? They always say you need ID for checks, but I would hope to goodness they check ID with credit cards as well! So personally I think the convenience and security aspect is a farce.

    The most secure financial situation, oddly enough, is a physical one - where there is actually hard currency. The reason? You actually have to posess the currency to use it. It's a whole lot more difficult to rob a safe than it is to tell a computer to move some numbers around (part of this difficulty is psychological - the rest is physical. You actually have to go somewhere and transport the currency. You have to get it, have something in which to carry it, and you have to get it to where you want it. Vastly different than computer crime - sit in a remote location, no immediate threats...you see what I'm saying, right?). Sure, with cash, you might get mugged. And if you're obscenely wealthy, you need a good place to store your cash. I think the financial gurus overlook the fact that posession is the most enforcable type of security (assuming, of course, you have a big enough stick to fend off any would-be theives).

    I think the concept of sticking something unnatural in my body just to participate in commerce is fundamentally wrong, independent of my religious beliefs. Rather than just complain about this, here are some reasons:

    It is segregatory: it automatically divides a population into the "priviledged" and "non-priviledge", the group who "works in the system" and those who "go against it", etc. etc. It's not like humanity needs any more reasons to focus on differences between people.

    It is a "rite of passage". It may be arguable that "commerce" is an inherent right of people - if you're born, you have the ability to contribute to society and probably will get the resources and toys you want in exchange for that ability. Requiring some "entry" into this arrangement (either chip, or other form of ID) can only serve to cause more social rifts. Think about the present taboo of "illegitimate children" and how this will be exacerbated by "hey you don't have an ID chip! Why not!?!"

    It objectifies people. One major problem I see today is that people forget that relationships are more important than things. The general population today is more and more selfish (I've mentioned this before) - look at all the "it's not my fault, it's theirs!" lawsuits. Look at how everyone is basically saying "let me do my thing how I want - but I'm going to tell you you can't do things how you want". When people are simply consumers and potential threats and all that jazz, we take something away from humanity.

    I guess to summarize, and before I get much more too wordy with this, it seems that this is another example of being able to do something and not considering if it should be done. There are far more implications than mere ones of faith, though those may not be least important.

    Somehow I feel as if all my deliberations on this have been random thinking, and I almost h

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  117. Crime Fighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If subcutinous (sp?) RFID is used for mainly for personal identification and RFID chips are embeded
    into dollar bills (euros, yen etc etc) you can
    suddenly get rid of organised crime, money laundering etc etc. Dpt of homeland security take note :-) (BTW would produce interesting FOREX rate fluctuations between RFID currencies and NON RDFID
    currencies)

    1. Re:Crime Fighting by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      They'd just microwave the bills.


      Move on, theres nothing to see here.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    2. Re:Crime Fighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They'd just microwave the bills."

      Uhhh - don't think so

  118. GROAN by tommck · · Score: 1
    That joke is so old. At least refer to it as an old joke rather than trying to pass it off as your own.

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    1. Re:GROAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do *you* know *what* the original poster was *trying* to do, Kreskin? Why don't *you* take the corncob out of your ass, re-fucking-lax and quit playing moderator. Old or no, I thought it was pretty funny and thanks for the laugh!

  119. Must be a cold day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I NEVER thought that i'd agree with a fundamentalist christian about anything.

  120. Dumb Idea of the Month by Aneirin · · Score: 1

    RFIDs allow for passive scanning by businesses or CRIMINALS. Now you can walk down the street and get your credit card stolen without even losing your wallet. There isnt even a way to know it is stolen since it is still planted inside you. I think someone didnt really think this thoroughly.

  121. Mark of the Beast or not by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    This is just too far. Why implant it? So you can not loose it? I am fine with the cards I have now.
    Since it is an RFID tag it could be used to track you where ever you go. Go to a movie and they know you went. Go to a bathroom in tha mall and they know you went there. Anyplace with an RFID scanner would know you are there.
    This is just... TO STRANGE and does not do anything that is good. Plus what about the medical risk of the inplant? I am sure the risk is minnimal but since it is of no benifit any risk is not worth it.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  122. Why Christian don't like RFID tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Christians consider their bodies as being a temple of God. A far more nobler concept than the nameless product of the commercial sector. It creeps me out that some people don't mind becoming walking credit cards? Then again people that only worry about materialistic things are the ones with the issues IMHO. The problem is not with the fundamental Christians. The problem is with the apathy of normal materialistic people. I mean what's wrong with a credit card or cash? I definitely don't want to be monitored 24/7.

    1. Re:Why Christian don't like RFID tags by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      No Vegans regard their bodies as Temples. The stuff I've seen most Christians put into their mouths is obscene.

      By the way, pork is still forbidden according to the Old Testament. So next time you shove a hot dog into your face while on luch break on Saturday (the Sabbath), remember that you're choosing what you want to believe in. You're the same as a non-believer if you don't adhere 100% to god's written law.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  123. This ounds pretty Orwellian to me. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Mark of the beast. I'm a techie.. but I won't implant an RFID tag in me for identity.. no way.

  124. If your gonna quote scripture... by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 1

    Being a Christian and seeing the scripture (mainly Rev 13:16-18) of my relgion banded about so much I thought I would link to a bunch of different translations which can be found Here. But some have mentioned that they would prefer to see the orginal text, well this one is the closest I can find (the web site has a bunch of other versions clicky here).

    My reason is simple, for only by looking at how man sees this text can we hope to discern the meaning behind this very poetic prophecy.

    Oh yeah, I think its a dumb idea by the way talk about one great way to track the movements and purchases of a people. Welcome to 1984.

    --

    How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

  125. Re:Why? Why?? please no! ;) by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    There are no contradictions in the Bible. It may appear that way but that is usually because of the reader is trying to create them.

    The important thing to realize about the Bible and how you can know it is truely God's Word is the following:
    Manuscript evidence
    Archeological evidence
    Predictive Prophecy
    Statistical evidence

    I'm not going to get into a long explanation but there is sufficent evidence in each of these areas to demonstrate that the Bible is unlike any other book ever written.

    I will give one example from the area of predictive prophecy. Around 750 B.C. the prophet Isaiah wrote these words:

    Is. 27:6 He shall cause them that come of Jacob to take root: Israel shall blossom and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.

    Pretty crazy thing to predict considering Israel at the time was a barren wasteland. Israel remained mostly dessert for 2700 years until 1948. Following the establishment of an Israeli state they began to irrigate the desserts and today Israel is a major agricultural producer. In 1999 Israel exported over $25 billion dollars worth of produce. Not only that but a significant portion of it is was as the prophecy stated fruit. Not only that, but another one is Israel's major exports is flowers. Israel sells flowers to Holland!

    This prophecy has been fulfilled virtually word for word in exacting detail. But that is not really that amazing when you consider that this is only the tip of the iceberg. The Bible contains 100s of prophecies like it.

  126. The previous 15 verses... by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    stipulate that this person will rain down fire from the heavens, making them believe he is a miracle worker, AND THEN ask everyone to have this mark in order to trade.

    That doesn't sound like this Applied Digital Solutions company to me...

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  127. Re:Christians? WRONG! Remember the Jewish Holocaus by smack_attack · · Score: 1

    Do you seriously think they would win any implantees if they ran out and said that they were going to use these to herd dissenters into the nearest incinerator?

    Hell no, tel them the tag will get them 20% off at the grocery store and they'll flock to you.

  128. How to calculate the number of the beast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assign 6 to A, 12 to B, 18 to C etc.

    For a word add the numbers together.

    Excise for the reader.

    What is the number for Computer ???

    The insighter.

  129. Diamond Age by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

    Another one of Neal Stephenson's inventions comes true. Only, IIRC, in the Diamond Age they used the entire skeleton as the antenna (by implanting a chip inside of a bone). With this, and the e-paper, and all the nanotechnology... I can't even tell truth from fiction anymore.

    --
    >|<*:=
  130. Installation process by Xaroth · · Score: 1

    Don't worry. It's just like piercing your hand!

    or...

    "Here we go!"
    "Owwww!"
    "Oh, don't be such a baby. Ow!"

  131. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by pmz · · Score: 1

    This elimiates the anonymous purchase.

    And flea markets, and selling your friend your lawnmower, and basically everything for the poor, and the arguably-innocent black-markets for some drugs, and pawn shops, and prostitution...

    You know, anyone who tries to make these things mandatory definitely has an agenda, because anyone else wouldn't care one way or another.

  132. All I gotta say is by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    If the sun goes out, the moon turns red, the entire earth quakes and big meteors start crushing houses, Ima gonna spend a lot more time than I am right now studying the bible and preparing for shit to go down than I am right now.

    I'v been also reading this website

    http://atschool.eduweb.co.uk/sbs777/prophecy/index .html

    which has some interesting info on it. Now, I'v been around wierdo's and crazy people all claiming to be christian since I was a widdle kid, and after reading through that stuff I'm a bit freaked. Especially since he makes it sound like the bible was written in a sensicle manner and if you've read any good cyberpunk horror novels, you'll realize the bible is the same thing with older language and more meaning.

  133. Re:LoL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would venture that Donald Knuth has at least a 50 point IQ advantage over you.

  134. Anti-Christ? by Theatetus · · Score: 1
    The Bible continues to say that the number of his (the anti-Christ) name is 666.

    The word "anti-Christ" does not appear anywhere in Revelation.

    It appears only in John's letters, and there in the plural ("antichrists", referring to anyone who is not Christian).

    Revelation is not about the anti-Christ. Revelation does not mention the anti-Christ. Try again, please.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Anti-Christ? by ultranova · · Score: 1
      It appears only in John's letters, and there in the plural ("antichrists", referring to anyone who is not Christian).

      Actually, from what I understood, the term "ant-christ" refers to people who teach a modified version of christianity. In other words, it's reserved for people who are actively twisting christianity and leading others astray with their teachings.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Anti-Christ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      The word "anti-Christ" does not appear anywhere in Revelation.

      True. He's referred to as the beast, or more specifically, the first beast.

      The word "rapture" isn't in the Bible, either, but it's a future event.

      Revelation is not about the anti-Christ. Revelation does not mention the anti-Christ. Try again, please.

      Just because something doesn't explicitly mention something means that it has no connection? There have been plenty of songs written that never mentioned the subject but inferred it.

      It appears only in John's letters, and there in the plural ("antichrists", referring to anyone who is not Christian).

      Actually, 1 John 3:18 (NIV) specifically reads, "Dear Children, this is the last hour; and as you heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour."

      John continues to write in 1 John 3:26, "I am writing these things to you about those who are trying to lead you astray." There have always been unbelievers. Do all unbelievers try to lead you astray? Not necessarily. I understand this to mean unbelievers that try to lead one away from the Word. David Koresh. Jim Jones. The Hale-Bopp-Comet-is-coming-with-a-UFO-behind-it guy.

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    3. Re:Anti-Christ? by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      In case of rapture, can I have your computers?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    4. Re:Anti-Christ? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

      Yes. You're welcome to the laptop whose keys have been ripped off by my dogs. :)

      --
      When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
    5. Re:Anti-Christ? by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

      Come on, give me the good stuff. Obviously, I'm staying here, and you're not going to need it, right?

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    6. Re:Anti-Christ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "rapture" isn't in the Bible, either, but it's a future event
      Correction: Its not a christian term in general, just a Catholic term

    7. Re:Anti-Christ? by stevet96 · · Score: 1

      "Correction: Its not a christian term in general, just a Catholic term" Bzzt. Wrong again. It's a pentacostal term. Most Catholics don't believe in the rapture.

    8. Re:Anti-Christ? by Micah · · Score: 1

      > The word "rapture" isn't in the Bible, either, but it's a future event.

      Actually, the greek Rapturo *is* in 1 Thesselonians 4, where it talks about us meeting the Lord in the air. It just isn't usually translated to Rapture in English.

  135. Fundamentalists oppose it...... by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

    Then it must be real good.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  136. Like on my forearm? by beorach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure someone already mentioned this... and the Fatherland Security post was getting there... but isn't everyone reminded of the Holocaust? I think I will steer clear of any identification implanted in my skin - be it a tattoo or a RFID.

  137. well George Orewll was right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a few years off in his prediction. Shoot ANYONE who advocates this tracking system. They are communist, spying Big Brother types in desperate need of death. Track down all supporters of this and similar technology. Ohhhh, we may save one child from molestation or kidnapping, BFD. The other side of the coin is tarnished with shit. Too many rights are being lost due to such shoddy thinking. Remember the Second Ammendment is an absolute, read the wording. The words "SHALL NOT BE ABRIDGED" is a commandment, not a suggestion. Learn to read you mealymouthed gun haters, you realize this ammendment was written speciically for your ilk.

  138. Imagine the convenience ... by jc42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I imagine is a new "customer convenience" feature: To buy something, all you have to do is pick it up and walk out of the store. The RFID sensors would identify you and the things you're buying, and automatically charge your account.

    At least that's what the advertising would tell you.

    What would also happen is that the RFID sensors would also identify the articles of clothing that you're wearing from their embedded chips, and would charge you for those, too. And every time you went out of that store, you'd be charged again for everything you're wearing.

    After a while, of course, customers would wise up to this and raise a stink. So the stores would fix the bug. They'd only pick one or two such items, and only when you're carrying a lot of new purchases. That way, you probably wouldn't notice the extra charges, unless you were really a stickler for checking every purchase. And even then, you'd face taking off a day of work and trying to prove to them that they'd included an extra charge.

    And if you tried to pay for something with cash, you might find yourself also being charged via the RFID. This has a precedent here in Massachusetts. The local toll roads have a "Fast Lane" electronic toll collection scheme. Usually it works well. But something that some people have found: In heavy traffic, sometimes you can't reach the Fast-Lane tollbooth. If you decide to go through a cash-only booth, there's a good chance that the sensors will detect your car and charge your account in addition. Sure, you can challenge it, and you'll probably win easily. But you'll have to take at least one day off work, and that's a steep price to pay to get maybe a $1 refund.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  139. Re:Why? Why?? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

    Because I'm a whimp and I don't want to go through the massive persecution of Christians that will accompany this. I think most other Christians are of the same ilk.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  140. Bible Quote by MadMoses · · Score: 1

    Revelations13:16: And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    (Karma whoring with the help of God! ;)

    --

    Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
    1. Re:Bible Quote by Iron+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I guess I'll just have to be sure to get the chip in my left hand then...

      --
      If my enemy's enemy is my friend, what happens if my enemy is his own worst enemy?
  141. No fscking way I'm ever doing this by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    The government will have to kill me. There's no way I'm going to allow anyone to electronically tag me.

  142. Re:Why? Why?? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Because of the hell we'll have to go through first! Nobody is in any hurry for that!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  143. Re:Bible has no contradictions by danharan · · Score: 1

    1- Which Bible? Do you include revelations?
    2- What version?
    3- What language?
    4- From what language?

    It's easy to find predictions that were realized. But some of the arguments you use are flawed. Of course it's unlike any other book. Every book is different. This also reminds me of arguments made by Muslims about the beauty and scientific accuracy of what's in the Qu'ran.

    And note, there ARE contradictions. There are statements that can't possibly be seen as true by any reasonnable person. The flood, the earth on four pillars... come on! And of course, the classic "earth is 4000 years old". If you go around saying/writing such silly things as this apparent contradiction being due to my inability to understand them, you must think I'm a moron.

    (Nota Bene: The earth is not 4k years old, it is only 5 minutes old. We have been actually created with all memories of what we did together, just like that 5 minutes ago by my very powerful God. Seems unsatisfying a cosmology? Yeah, I thought so. But why?)

    What's worse is that Jesus was a master at using allegories, and all his followers want to interpret his second-hand, second-language records literally.

    Repeat after me: "We are all individuals"

    (PS: I have a lot of admiration for what Jesus actually did and taugth)

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  144. It's simpler than all that! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Ideas like personal RFID tags get pushed because they make sense! Look at most of the financial headlines lately...9/11, Enron, worldcom, martha, RIAA, MPAA...They all involve individuals making poor choices...to the concequence of many other people who are just trying to earn a living.

    The joke is that RIGHT NOW it's the hyper-conservatives that are doing all the damage! ...the very same people fearing the "666" of the beast. It's all about lack of personal responsibility...typically a Democrat thing, that nobody should be able to take advantage of anybody else [loan fraud, abusive work contracts...]...so we need more technology [i.e. govt] to "protect" people. Coupled with the recent attacks and financial screw ups even the other side [Reps] wants more govt control...more acountability, paperwork, sigs...get the idea...protect those corps... now they want ID so they can sneak around and find out what you were doing when nobody was looking.

    Asia has these issues even more than the US...and accept it even more redily. Both America and Southeast asia have very busy, highly complex societies...and even "playful disruption" is becomming a "terrorist" act. The problem is that govt has gotten too big...and make too many stupid laws nobody can follow. meaning that the General Pouplation tolerates a certian amount of "lawlessness" because they've lost control of the govt [not enough people vote to matter]...it doesn't represent the people's interests anymore! Now the govt is interested in enforcing the law as "cheaply and effecently" as possible...it's not about right or wrong anymore, just "acceptable losses" [sounds like war, hun?] to look like they're doing their job. The govt is a company now...justice meeted out like fries a McD's. [with less personal accountability]

    In all these cases, it makes more and more sense to normal people [most /.er are not normal people] to simply "make it so you can't" break the laws...or be wrongly accused... So we have to build a bigger, better "mouse trap". Look at all the hacks to the current round of technology...many normal people just want stuff to be easy and simple. even innocent hacking is "terrorist" to most people...you'd be suprised how many "normal" people think "internet programming" == "bank cracking" ...it's way more than you would think!

    so in the end, for security and liberty, people will throw all their trust, and personal responsiblity, into the next big electronic system that the govt pushes. The govt has the ability to use guns to enforce it, so it will be MADE to work...get the idea. Who controls the govt...well, it's an irresponsible "beast" already isn't it? And there you have it. The only glimmer of sunshine right now is that the events are described after rapture...all those pesky "christian zelots" won't be here to bother you anymore...and it will be great...for about 3.5 years. People forget THAT fact when they read those prophesies...everything that happens in Revelation is the apogee of human ingunity and "wisdom" ...Without silly "religous" pressures. Until the whole thing goes to ....

  145. My dog got one of those already. by JulianOolian · · Score: 1

    Applied Digital Solutions are marketing the VeriChip as the world's only implantable ID technology.

    ... and it's different from the ones already inside my dogs, how?

  146. Mark of the Beast aside... by Art_XIV · · Score: 1

    What's really goddamned scary about the idea of implantable chips is that banks are probably going to want a fifty-dollar a month 'service' fee just for having the thing and will probably still be deducting fifty cents or two dollars or more for every stinkin' transaction that you make.


    Neato technology, but I'll be paying with cash, thank you.

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
  147. Re:Why? Why?? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey there! Welcome to "You Don't Know My Religion"!

    The prophecy of Revelations is what will happen, not what has to happen first.

    In other words -- the End Times don't occur just because some people decided to try to make it occur. They may do a pretty damn good job of recreating the living hell that is described in Revelations, but that doesn't make it Revelations.

    I could go out today and "convince" everyone on earth to wear my "Mark of the Burke" (slogan: "Easier than cash; better than being shot!"). That doesn't make me the anti-Christ, and wouldn't put Christ's return a day sooner. Even a pet genetically-engineered seven-headed giant monitor lizard (who I'd call "Gnashy") wouldn't qualify me.

    Unless of course I -am- the anti-Christ. I'm pretty sure I'm not. I'm certainly not going to go make peoples' lives miserable on the off-chance that I am.

    Another way to look at is this: Revelations describes some of the worst human suffering imagineable. World War II involved some of the worst human suffering imagineable, but it wasn't the war of Revelations. If World War III occurs, it may or may not be the war of Revelations as well, but it will still be an unimagineable human disaster.

    I know you were being facitious, but you also are saying "Know Your Religion" when you are the one who is less informed.

    Although there are people who think exactly what you're saying and they claim to have read the Bible. Apparently they missed the part, which I thought was pretty clear, when it is said that you won't know when the end times are here.

    So advocating, allowing, or heaven forbid causing human suffering in the hopes of seeing Jesus return is really, really stupid.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  148. Re:some other ways to wind up religious nut cases. by Psiren · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow, some neat ideas there. I especially like the first one. I'm not sure if you're offended, or just think I'm an arse. I don't really care either way to be honest. I believe that religion is a fundamentally flawed concept, and in general a bad idea best forgotten. Therefore I reserve the right to make fun of those who practice it. Note that I fully accept the right for people to believe what they wish, and have no intentions of malice. If they in turn wish to point and laugh at me for being a total nerd, then I have no problem with that.

    I have no intention of ever having kids, so your final point is moot. But nice attempt at offence nonetheless :)

  149. Why have a chip implanted... by thesuperbigfrog · · Score: 1

    when you can use biometrics with encryption instead? A retina scanner in place of a PIN for a debit/credit card would be easy to integrate into the existing system and would not be objectionable.

    --
    42
    1. Re:Why have a chip implanted... by delphin42 · · Score: 1

      Because then you don't need the card. You can still use the biometrics (or PIN, signature, etc)to verify the identity so someone with a faked RFID tag (or an extracted one) can't access your account, but now you don't have to keep track of a silly plastic card to have access to your money.

      --
      -- Adam
  150. Credsticks by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


    For the benefit of the non-elves here, the cred-sticks were essentially sophisticated credit-card devices that were tied to a specific account.
    They came in certified and non-certified forms, the former being allocated a certain amount of credit on purchase from your local bank / authority and the latter being keyed to a registered individual.

    The other nice detail was that certified ones were colour coded so you could wave around your black and gold one in the club to impress people. :)
    - At least if you were a cat shaman and you liked to behave like that... *yuk yuk*

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    1. Re:Credsticks by MxTxL · · Score: 1

      That was, of course, unless you had the source book that gave rules for forging credsticks. Then everyone with enough nuyen to invest had a virtually undetectable fake credstick with unlimited funds.

      Good times.

  151. Uh, wouldn't you be flipping yourself off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking the scanner reads your finger print, meaning that the your finger was facing you, so basically you were telling yourself to fuck off.

  152. Theft by elodan · · Score: 1
    I can stand having my wallet stolen. But what happens when it's part of my arm? I'd rather not be mugged for a chunk of my bicep, thankyouverymuch.

    Brings a new meaning to the phrase "a pound of flesh" though...

  153. Ounce of prevention = pound of cure by awfar · · Score: 1

    Once this idea gets started, it will be impossible to reverse. The need for cash has almost been eliminated already; they will say only CRIMINALS use cash. Yeah, to hide my meager wealth from the bloodsucking corps. and gov.

  154. Re:Why? Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up.
    This is the Christian view and I agree with it.

  155. Two birds, one stone. by tigris · · Score: 0, Troll

    They are also receiving condemnation from some fundamentalist Christians who believe that this is the fabled 'mark of the beast' of biblical lore.
    For this reason alone, I really want one of these now. Piss off a bible-thumper and pay bills easily.

  156. hmmm by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    kidnapping and murder will only arise from this.
    because if theifs want your money, theyll either cut your arm off, kill you, or kidnap you.
    at least it'll make ransom easier..

    "I WILL RELEASE...fuck it..." *scans the person's arm and shoots them instead*

  157. good dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another way to look at is this: Revelations describes some of the worst human suffering imagineable. World War II involved some of the worst human suffering imagineable, but it wasn't the war of Revelations. If World War III occurs, it may or may not be the war of Revelations as well, but it will still be an unimagineable human disaster.

    Do you have any idea how offensive you sound?

    Here you are comparing imaginary, theoretical human suffering to the very real suffering and deaths of the Jews, Gypsies, Poles and others targeted by Hitler's reign of terror. The fuck???

    It's so much better to feel like a victim than face your own shady past, isn't it? What a great way for white christians to avoid their guilt about The Trail of Tears, American slavery, anti-semitism, and the persecution of Irish and Chinese. "Those persecutions were nothing compared to what we (who so far have only reaped the benefits of other's persecution) will suffer!" Wow. That's brilliant!

    PS-Last time I checked, Revelations was an allegorical account of the persecution of Christians under Roman rule, with the hope of immediate Theistic reprisal. Last time I checked, it's been irrelevant since, oh, about 392CE.

    1. Re:good dog by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how offensive you sound?

      No, because I very much didn't mean what you seem to think I meant.

      Here you are comparing imaginary, theoretical human suffering to the very real suffering and deaths of the Jews, Gypsies, Poles and others targeted by Hitler's reign of terror. The fuck???

      Ah, you were confused by my comparison, as if I was saying some future hypothetical war is going to make WWII look like happy days at the park. Sorry, my fault.

      My observation was that WWII was pretty much the closest thing to what was described in Revelations as I can think of in human history, and yet the End Times didn't occur. Thus the postulate that one can cause Jesus to return by creating the situations described in Revelations is demonstrably false. The corrollary is that just because incredible suffering is going on doesn't mean it is the end.

      Let me say it another way: WWII was fucking awful. If I was living during it, I would probably think I was living in the end times, and for damn good reason because my life would read like a page from Revelations. The same could be said if I was living in a trench in WWI.

      But it wasn't the end times. Meaning humans are perfectly capable of creating hell on earth with no help from the Horsemen of the Apocalypse or the anti-Christ.

      I guess I don't know how to be any more clear than that. I was disparaging the idea that humans could cause the end of time, not the idea that humans are murderous bastards capable of causing incredible suffering that makes you wish time would end.

      It's so much better to feel like a victim than face your own shady past, isn't it? What a great way for white christians to avoid their guilt about The Trail of Tears, American slavery, anti-semitism, and the persecution of Irish and Chinese.

      Actually I probably feel a lot more guilt for those things than I should seeing as I didn't do any of them. But if you knew anything about me (not that you should) you'd know I very much like to remind those around me of those events. I'm very much against white Christians feeling high and mighty, and reminding them of some of the things done by their ancestors is as good a way as any to remind them they aren't special.

      "Those persecutions were nothing compared to what we (who so far have only reaped the benefits of other's persecution) will suffer!" Wow. That's brilliant!

      Actually, while persecution of Christians is something that is supposed to happen in the end times, Revelations is as clear as it can possibly be about anything in a book filled with singing eyeball creatures that life is going to suck for everyone. I don't think it was supposed to imply that Christians would be the only ones being skewered.

      PS-Last time I checked, Revelations was an allegorical account of the persecution of Christians under Roman rule, with the hope of immediate Theistic reprisal.

      My understanding is that it is more an allegorical account of Jewish persecution under Babylonian rule. With references, I believe, to another period of persecution before that.

      Hope things are more clear now.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  158. Re:Why? Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent post!

    This is the best summary I have seen today.

  159. Let's hope the fundamentalists are right this time by tgv · · Score: 1

    Then at least our kids won't have to suffer this new, ridiculous fad... If the fundamentalists are wrong, let's just go and implant a few chips in mr. Silverman and see how the stock market responds to that announcement.

  160. Oh, they're cheering it on all right by ianscot · · Score: 1
    "Much of the Christian Right demands all-out U.S. support for Israel, not for reasons of national interest, but for allegedly Biblical reasons: they hope the battle of Armageddon, forecast in the Book of Revelation, will soon erupt in the Middle East, and they want the U.S. Government to help bring it about by backing Israel..."
    -- Joseph Sobran

    This isn't just crackpot ideas people have about black helicopters (that being my Southern Baptist relations' big one) or whatever; it is informing, helping to shape, U.S. Foreign Policy. Think Bush's backing of Sharon has nothing to do with Revelation? It isn't just the Middle East, either. Reagan used to say stuff about living in the "end times." 'Cause, you know, he was fighting that 'evil empire,' you know?

    Or take a look at the "Left Behind" series of novels. Best sellers in the U.S.

    I had a girl sit in front of me in a creative writing class who told me her plan was to have children soon -- but to schedule them so the apocalypse would come just before they became adolescents. No unruly teenagers -- all thanks to the "end time," again.

    These people, or a healthy percentage of them that amounts to millions of Americans anyway, are positively pining for the Apocalypse. Their internal lives can largely involve fantasizing about the end. Without going out of my way in a fairly "liberal" state (Minnesota), I've run into my share.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  161. Politics makes strange bedfellows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems as true as ever in this case. This puts the Fundamentalist Christians, the Libertarians and the Techno-Liberal-Anti-Ashcrofters squarely on the same side.

    So we have vociferous moral beliefs that this is intrinsically wrong, reasoned political arguments that the government should not have such tracking power over indivitual liberties, and a long list of technical arguments about inadequate security for the chips, their data, etc. Moreover this brings the new reality that a mugger will now have a reason to cut off one's hand instead of just taking the wallet.

    Could somebody remind me why anybody would think this is a good enough idea to even propose? I like the RFID technology for a lot of purposes (e.g., we already use similar transponders for timing and scoring in sportscar races). But this idea seems so toxic that the RFID promotors would avoid it like the plague.

    1. Re:Politics makes strange bedfellows by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      Seems as true as ever in this case. This puts the Fundamentalist Christians, the Libertarians and the Techno-Liberal-Anti-Ashcrofters squarely on the same side.

      Heh. I hadn't thought of it in that way. Once you look at it, though, it makes perfect sense. It works like Ockham's Razor for the non-scientist.

      To paraphrase:

      If most groups with diametrically opposing views agree, then their view is most likely correct.

      I like it!

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
  162. NOT the point by awfar · · Score: 1

    The real point is that you will be forced to conform. Do you think it would be implanted and not forcibly utilized or enforced? No paycheck, no scholarships, no buying food, no registration with gov. means, no job. Pay compensation is now made with bank transfers; no cash or check allowed.

    enuff said

  163. Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > I'm not laughing. The question is this: "Is anyone else listening?"

    A lot of people (or their machines) are listening. Many of them work for General Ashcroft. Many of them do not. Only recently have the people running the machines been allowed to talk to each other. (It used to be that if the people running not-the-General's machines talked to the people running DoJ machines, both of them went to jail. That little bit of 60s-era enlightenment cost us 3,000 people, $100B of property damage, caused two wars so far, and delayed the present global economic recovery by a year.)

    Let me put it this way: If we were really heading into a police state (as opposed to merely a secure state), you, along with everyone else who uses terms like "Herr Ashcroft" and "Fatherland Securite", have just committed suicide by posting pseudonymously to a message board on a monitored network.

    So fess up. If you're one of those people, are you truly suicidal, or are you merely suffering from terminal Godwinian hyperbole? There are people who can help.

  164. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Sure...devices and files on a Unix (or Unix like) system are handled essentially the same way. Each has a designated owner and a designated group. Say, the device is a modem. The owner would be "root" (or the "superuser") and the group could be, say, "internet". Permissions could be set up so that any user who is a member of the group "internet" can access the mode through thier account. It's basically a simple, elegant way to manage permissions.
    .
    .
    Now, the mode number follows the format USER-GROUP-OTHER ("OTHER" is everybody else). Each of USER, GROUP, and OTHER gets it's own three digit binary number to represent what they can do to the file in order of READ, WRITE, and EXECUTE. So, giving everybody access to said modem would be as follows:
    .
    USER = 110, GROUP = 110, OTHER = 110.
    .
    This means anyone can read data from or write data to the modem (in Unix, you can't execute a device so the last bit is zero. If we were talking about a file, then U, G, and O would each be 111).

    Now, the shorthand is to express this as a three digit "mode" number where each digit is the decimal equivalent of the three digit binary numbers for USER, GROUP, and OTHER. Therefore, the mode number that grants universal access to a device would be 666.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  165. Re:Why? Why?? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless you think you're being funny mentioning "_bloody_ prerequisite" you obviously need to read the Bible a bit more with less biased eyes, sure the the returning of the Savior is a good thing. But the coming of the Antichrist is not. There are lots of other bad things that will happen around then too.

    Why don't you go ask a mother-to-be if she's worried about labour pains (even if everyone knows it's going to go well in the end), I mean she should be cheering the birth of her baby right?

    I won't be very happy the day the Beast or his minions revoke my smartcard's digital cert just because I decided the new "EULA" just wasn't agreeable to me[1].

    Within 30 days (or certificate revocation list update period), my identity certificate then becomes invalid, can't buy, can't sell, can't travel.

    As for people talking about "why not biometrics". They're ignorant. YOUR biometrics will be included in YOUR certs, so it will be easy to validate that a certificate belongs to a person and wasn't "ripped off" from another. e.g. if the certificate is valid, but the included photo, iriscan, fingerprints don't match, it's been ripped off from someone else.

    Oh yeah cheer this stuff on. Lots of us in the tech industry are sure speeding it along. But you got to give credit to the guys making stuff like DMCA, Patriot Act and so on too.

    And the malware writers, hackers and spammers are sure helping too - "We" "need" a Global Gov, Court and Legal system to handle cross border problems like this and inconvenient nations who refuse to kowtow - (freedom fries are a beginning symptom). Centralisation + Globalisation of everything. Single point of failure.

    I'm not saying it'll all happen the way I mentioned - I'm no prophet. But it sure looks possible soon.

    Not even sure I should be writing all this here, but it should be pretty obvious to those who are preparing the Beast's throne anyway.

    You want to cheer this stuff on go ahead. Remember though, if you're not careful you might even be cheering the wrong stuff on too when the day comes. Maybe with a fake smile on your face just in case the Beast notices. Maybe you'd have to do what a German guy did and carry large parcels under both arms all the time so as not to have to salute. Not sure if that saved anyone's lives (other than his), but it's hard to fault him.

    "Know Your Religion"? Well what do you really believe? Sure lots of fundies are pretty stupid, but Christianity is not just for the totally stupid. e.g. I'm only stupid most times and not all the time.

    [1] Naturally the Govs will say only the "Bad People/Terrorists" won't agree to the "EULA". The real security people know what a lie that is. But hey didn't a bunch of people try to introduce IDs after 9/11, despite the hijackers having valid IDs? Eventually enough people will believe or allow them to do it.

    --
  166. Legal Tender by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    I had thought that the status of US Currency as "Legal Tender For All Debts Public and Private" would help us by at least providing a constitutional basis for refusing such a requirement and continuing to use cash.

    However a bit of checking revealed that not only does Legal Tender not have a constitutional basis, it is actually probably unconstitutional from any reasonably strict reading.

    One of the first references I found (no vouching for cred.) http://www.libertyhaven.com/regulationandpropertyr ights/bankingmoneyorfinance/illegalitylegal.shtml
    points out that the first Supreme Court decision went against its constitutional status, and the second ruling for it was by a court by Grant and containing a significant overturnable error.

    Thus, my read on the bottom line is that, for now, the Legal Tender laws are officially constitutional. Even though these laws are questionable, it is in the govt's interest to support them, and so they will remain constitutional for now. However, when the govt sees it no longer in its interest to maintain cash as Legal Tender, it would not be all that hard to overturn. So, this potential requirement for RFID implants to replace cash is actaully more of a risk than we might have first thought.

    Any more detailed or accurate info available?

  167. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by cerberus1949 · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say that I think that's the direction in which we are almost certainly heading at this point, but we're not quite there yet. Since we aren't quite there yet there is still time for us to prevent ever getting there IF large groups of us realize the potential problem and exert whatever power we still retain as citizens in a rational manner. As for the idea that we must choose between living in a police state or one of insecurity, that is a dangerous slope to cross. Remember what Ben Franklin [think that was the one] said about folks who would trade freedom for security -- that they'd neither have nor deserve either.

    If in your estimation sounding the alarm is suicidal then I guess that's what you'll think I am -- and you might be right.

  168. Utterly Inevitable By Biometrics Or Otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone, anyone, help me out here. It will not be that long before anonymity will be IMPOSSIBLE given that rapidly decreasing computing/sensing costs are going to enable a broad array of biometrics to be deployed at low cost. Some have been mentioned before, but face recognition, body typing, retina scanning, hand geometry... on and on

    So why get creeped out? You're only one database and a bunch of cheap sensors from being automatically and immediately identifiable.

  169. Re:Bible has no contradictions by SLi · · Score: 1

    1- Which Bible? Do you include revelations?
    2- What version?
    3- What language?
    4- From what language?


    The original Bible, written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, of which the current versions in those languages are quite accurate copies and of which there are many more or less accurate translations in a number of languages. Specifically, "the Bible" does not mean any random translation X with all its translation and copying errors.

    And note, there ARE contradictions. There are statements that can't possibly be seen as true by any reasonnable person. The flood, the earth on four pillars... come on! And of course, the classic "earth is 4000 years old".

    I guess you are talking about this:

    "He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them.", I Samuel 2:8 (KJV).

    If you read the context, you notice it's part of the prayer of a woman named Hannah, who is human, humane and therefore prone to err. Also you underestimate the biblical people if you think they can't talk in a figurative sense. When they do, it's usually clear from the context, as it is in this case. Contrast to

    "He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.", Job 26:7 (KJV).

    I for one believe in a young (say <10000 years old) earth. It's all quite explainable scientifically if you don't start from the assumption that everything had to start from nothing and evolve gradually (e.g. specification by devolution).

    If you go around saying/writing such silly things as this apparent contradiction being due to my inability to understand them, you must think I'm a moron.

    I don't think you're a moron. I think you're just a victim of a clever deceit. Satan is so powerful that none of us would have any chance of escaping his webs if it weren't for Christ.

  170. Re:Why? Why?? by Maradine · · Score: 1

    Fair. I stand partially corrected. :)

    --

    trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

  171. Marketing Strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds Good Till
    Some makes a scanner. Steals ID codes, then Sells clone chips. becuase everyone knows their code can never be broken.

  172. Not the only company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Applied Digital Solutions are marketing the VeriChip as the world's only implantable ID technology.

    BS. There was a company trying to market this (a year or so ago) type of technology as a medic-alert bracelet replacement.

  173. Mod parent post up :) by TheLink · · Score: 1

    Objectively why should the parent post be flamebait?

    Looks like a devout atheist was moderating the parent post ;).

    --
  174. Veri* by operagost · · Score: 1

    The VeriPay service is one of several the company has launched to promote its product. Applied Digital has positioned its microchip as an anti-kidnapping device (VeriKid), emergency ID system (VeriMed) and as a way to control access to secure buildings (VeriGuard).

    VeriScary ...
    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  175. Thanks for reminding me by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    that Steve Martin used to be funny and a valuable contributor to the popular culture instead of a Huckster for the mega-wedding industry.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  176. Why Implant Them? by b!arg · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to see the day where if I owe someone five bucks I just hold my credit card/check card to theirs and transmit 5 bucks from my account to theirs. Obviously there would be a little more to it than just holding it to the other's card (otherwise that would be a pretty easy way to be a pickpocket), but you get my drift.

    --

    Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  177. Re:Bible has no contradictions by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    Any decent translation from the Greek and Hebrew will do. God wrote the Bible in such a way that you don't need PhDs in Greek and Hebrew to get the message. Its not about every word being translated exactly. Any decent translation will give you all you need to know to make an educated decision.

    Those AREN'T contradictions. Those are misunderstandings on your part. Please show me where the Bible says the earth is 4000 years old. Again as I've said, if you are looking for errors and not looking to understand the message, you will see contradictions that do not exist.
    I don't think you are a moron. You sound like you are simply regurgitating humanist propaganda that you have not truley examined for yourself.

    I do have a B.S. degree in Biology and I have studied the Bible in depth and therefore I am making informed decisions as to what I believe having weighed both sides for myself.

    You seem to imply that because the Bible seems to contradict science, it must be wrong. Again this is different from the Bible contradicting itself. As a scientists I know that Science != Truth. Scientists are not unbiased. They have agendas and often use science to manipulate others.

  178. Re:Why? Why?? by Maradine · · Score: 1

    Unless you think you're being funny mentioning "_bloody_ prerequisite" you obviously need to read the Bible a bit more with less biased eyes, sure the the returning of the Savior is a good thing. But the coming of the Antichrist is not. There are lots of other bad things that will happen around then too.

    Sure. And I'm not saying that I necessarily agree with the implementation of the technology. Hell, on the Political Compass scale, I'm two clicks shy of being as Libertarian as the Dalai Lama.

    My point is that from the standpoint of a fundamentalist Christian (using the sweeping stereotype), this should be great news. Or at least a step in the ultimately right direction.

    As for me, I'm not sure how the whole thing is supposed to work. I'd far rather take my chances with putting a bullet in the anti-christ than waiting for Jesus. Unless I can get the Pay-per-View rights.

    --

    trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

  179. Gimmy your wallet, err, I'll take your arm as well by ixpro · · Score: 1

    So for now when I'm being mugged, I'm not really worried about some punk chopping my hands off! I just can't wait for this lovely invention to hit the market. We live in truely delightfull times...

  180. Would you? by phorm · · Score: 1

    OK, so the premise here is that at the end of it all, we'll find salvation. However, leading up to that point is a whole lot of pain, suffering, enslavement, and general unpleasantness. I don't that even fundamentalists are looking forward to the beginning of the end so much as they are saying "at the end, things will be good for those that believe."

    It's like having a genetic disease/infection that requires major surgury. You're possibly going to lose some important parts, almost definately suffer some pain and indignity, but in the end you'll be ok (or at least better off than with the disease). You know it will strike somebody in the family, but you'd rather it didn't catch the bus at your generation.

  181. Conspiracy theory for the week by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

    The RFID tag makers are (somehow) spurning on the fundamentalists, so anyone who expresses concern over the implants will be made fun of and derided as "one of those religious wackos".

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  182. Why are fundamentalists opposed? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

    If you really believe that these are unavoidable profecies, then what is the point in protesting?

    Tor

  183. Same old fundies by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Fundamentalists said the same thing about the barcode 20 years ago. I work in a library where we implemented barcode technology in, umm, 1983. Several people demanded that their names be dis-associated with any barcode because that was clearly the sign of the beast as foretold in the Bible. Thus they could check out no books, thus remaining ignorant, which, I suppose, was the whole point of the exercise.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  184. Privicy Issues are Not Limited to Your Purchases by ahodgkinson · · Score: 2, Insightful
    With an embedded RFID chip you would not only leave records of what you purchased, but also where you have been. What's to prevent the collection of individual RFID numbers by installing of RFID readers in every office doorway, lamp post, parking meeter, etc.? They obviously wouldn't debit your account, but they could passivly forward the time and your ID code to some secret location when you walk by.

    In fact they already have devices that do this, but they are not (yet) implanted. They are called ankle transponders and have been used as an alternative to prison. Have a look at this or this article.

    Worse, in the near future, you probably won't even be able to hide your cash transactions. RFID tags embedded in bank notes are on their way. The EE Times reports that in Europe it's planned for 2005.

    Oh, but how will they know who I am when I spend tagged cash? It's pretty simple, by one of the following methods:

    • You took the money out of an ATM and the ID numbers were logged with your name during the withdrawl.
    • You had your mobile phone with you, which pings the local cell.
    • Got the money from someone else, but it's detected because (the currently faulty) facial recognition software attatched to the video camera in the shop (or streetcorner) where you made the purchase.
    • The passivly track cash moving through the city, just like they track the people.
    If you want a quick overview of where we're headed with RFID have a look at this article.

    Technology is amazing, and the current convergence of computing power, large databases and tiny radio transponders even more amazing. I don't know about you, but I also find it pretty scary.

    --
    ---- It won't be as bad as you fear or as good as you hope, but it will take twice as long as you plan.
  185. I don't believe this but.... by ikoleverhate · · Score: 1

    No, the number of his name is the 666 bit. Now, find a barcode with a 6 in the number. Look at the bars directly above it. You'll notive that the bars used at the start middle and end of the barcode are the same as the one for the six, only longer. 666, get it? Not that I believe all this apocalypse shit, just an interestic bit of trivia for you. heres a more in depth examination for anyone interested.

  186. An Kidnappers will love it too! by replay+TV+Guy · · Score: 0

    Walk into that bar and voila!!! This mark has A1 credit and a line of credit that can finance his or her abduction!!

    Not for me...

  187. Want it on you hand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, you can "put it in your forhead" by remembering a pin number instead :)

    I for one, DO NOT welcome our antiChrist overlord.

  188. Geez, can't you read? by sean.peters · · Score: 1
    He's 639622.

    Sean

  189. Total Transparency, or nothing by ka9dgx · · Score: 1
    I'll do it ONLY if I see it working on ALL of our elected leaders, for at least 1 year, and we all get full read access to the system across the internet, and it is guaranteed to stay that way.

    No Exceptions for anyone, ever.

    Obviously, they won't go for that, so why should I?

    --Mike--

  190. Major, major security issues by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    I cannot help but think this is going to be a major security problem if it is implemented. If you thought bored teenagers (and worse, actual malicious crackers) wardriving for open wireless networks was bad, just wait until thieves with RFID scanners are standing at busy street corners and bus stops emptying your virtual wallet.

    Of course, one would think that such a scheme would be implemented with a PIN or some other kind of password, but then, what advantage would it have over a debit card? I don't know about you, but the only time I don't have my debit card with me is when my pants are off (and call me prudish, but I kind of insist on my debit card not being a prerequisite for having my pants off), so a subdermal RFID debit chip is really not going to offer me any convenience unless -- as no doubt they ultimately plan -- the only authorization required for dinging my account is to have some pasty-faced clerk smacking a button on his cash register.

    And if you thought changing cell phone providers was painful, wait until you change RFID bank networks! Ouch!

    Oh wait, of course, the idea is that the banking community will adopt a common scheme with RFID chips acting as -- drum roll, please -- de facto universal identifiers. Mark of the beast if you're into neolithic supersition, or the long arm of warrantless, unaccountable federal law enforcement if you live in the modern age.

    More benignly, if an order of magnitude more annoyingly, wait until commissioned salespeople can discreetly perform a pre-authorization on your RFID to see how much they can shake you down for. Does your car salesman seem to have an almost uncanny sense of how much he can screw you for? Does your down-on-his-luck buddy always seem to get a better price on goods and services than you do? Welcome to the brave new world of commercial information awareness.

    Thank you, but I'll pass. I like my cards dumb and my chips in PCBs.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Major, major security issues by Desirsar · · Score: 1

      "Oh wait, of course, the idea is that the banking community will adopt a common scheme with RFID chips acting as -- drum roll, please -- de facto universal identifiers. Mark of the beast if you're into neolithic supersition, or the long arm of warrantless, unaccountable federal law enforcement if you live in the modern age." Or those of us who live outside of traditional boundaries might see those as one and the same... I doubt pre-authorization would be necessary. In fact, why would balance checking be available from anyone but your bank itself? They'd only be able to perform an actual transfer, and the balance would either be sufficient or not.

    2. Re:Major, major security issues by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      In fact, why would balance checking be available from anyone but your bank itself? They'd only be able to perform an actual transfer, and the balance would either be sufficient or not.

      Not so. I have a merchant account, and I can easily perform pre-authorization on a credit card transaction. I typically do it when someone wants to reserve an expensive piece of rental equipment and I want to make sure they can actually afford it before I turn down other potential rental customers. It's not quite the same thing as balance checking -- but I can progressively try to pre-authorize various sums until I hit your limit. In fact, assuming that you have $25,000 or less in your checking account -- a safe assumption for most people -- a simple binary search will let me determine your balance to within $200 or so within seven tries.

      That would, of course, be an abuse of the system, but it's not illegal, and if I were a big enough merchant, odds are I could induce my transaction gateway service to overlook the indiscretion.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  191. circumcision by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Apart from the odd wierdo, most people get completely creeped out by this kind of thing.

    That's describes circumcision pretty well, too... so I suggest we do the implantation shortly after birth. Problem will be solved in a generation.

    (And NO, I'm not suggesting the two operations be done at the same time)

  192. Mark of the beast or not. by Irvu · · Score: 1
    Who wants a society where everything that you buy is done with a unique chip. The way I see it there are two issues here.

    1) The fact that anyone using this has a uniquely-identifiable RFID tag that can be scanned by anyone at any time. Personally I'm not all that paranoid but I just don't want a society where everything I do involved broadcasting "I 2934208209348230 am here!" to anyone and everyone. While it's true that the Government can track most of my financial transactions now I don't really want to make it that much easier for them, for my bank, my credit-card company, my parents, etc. to follow my every financial (and physical) move.

    2) How does this work with the modern financial market? Most of my aqquaintances make use of more than one form of payment on a day-to-day basis. Most of us have at least one bank account, credit card, and use at least some cash. I at least do this partly from convenience (who wants to sign their name all the time) and partly from necessity (not all stores take plastic or cheques).

    How would this work with that? Would eveyone whyo uses it be forced to draw from a single account or to use some brokering service to select. I.E. do I give them a finger and then say "cheque" or "Mastercard?" Or do I give them a separate finger, hand, etc for each source.

    It would seem to me that: This would only work with such a hybrid system or else the financial community who depends upon competition for their products would be devastated.

    It also seems to me that this will never become "the way to pay for everything" unless the federal government mandates that everyone use it. If not then all the small shops who only take cash now will just stay with cash. Or WalMart and Target will so come to dominate the market that noone shops at small stores anymore. Given that the Small Business Administration (A branch of the U.S. Government) has had to sure other parts of the government to stop some anti-small business policies this isn't that unthinkable.

    3) Lastly, am I the only one who thinks that the pictures attatched to the wired story resemble "the bug" from The Matrix (the thing that they stick in Neo's stomach).

    The essential inefficiencies of the current system are one of the surest safeguards of our privacy. If they can't do it by law then they will break the law. If they can't do it at all then they can't do it at all.


  193. Re:Why? Why?? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
    According to one interpretation of Revelation, when these things occur, though, Christians will be persecuted in a way that will make the Holocaust seem like a fairy tale. Then, after the tribulation, the faithful will join Christ in his Kingdom.
    So basicly God is planning a mass murder again? And you people want to spend eternity with him????

    There are several stories in the bible in which God killed off entire cities and he's supposed to be the good guy? Guess I'll be taking my chances with the devil then.
  194. I bought the stock by inKubus · · Score: 1

    At .30 a share. Right after 9/11/01 it shot up to like 1.80. I just bought some more at .35

    Stuff like this is enevitable. It makes sense and I think it will make everyone's life a lot simpler. However, the potential for abuse is there, just like with anything. Yes, it's turning you into more of a machine, but so is using the internet, etc. You don't think people are tracking your movements on the 'net???!

    People who get paranoid over this stuff need to realize it's already over, it's already done. The world has changed. Now it's either keep up or get left behind.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  195. "Can This Unit Borrow 10 Credits, Bob876?" by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1
    Once again, I must go into my standard rant about digital cash:

    • You can't loan a friend ten bucks.
    • Your ID can be duplicated, stolen or zeroized.
    • You can only buy from someone who can process your ID.
    • Your purchasing info can be used against you by police, courts and government agencies.
    Given all that, then what's with the geek's heart going all a'flutter over digital cash? Furthermore, why do the geeks seem to think that all physical cash will be replaced?

    I hope for the sake of this article, the term "replace" was used to indicate "some instances" of replacement in space and time, and not "all instances".
    --
    [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  196. i will just get one with my peck implants... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that will probably leak and have to be removed.
    So by that time, i will switch to sand pecks and
    have the rfid thing removed also.

  197. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by flyonthewall · · Score: 1
    I can't help but find it interesting that the "number of the beast" is also the Unix mode number for universal device access.


    Lord Gate, save us from Evil and gives us our daily task....

    --
    "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
  198. It will be a cold day in that very hot spot... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    ...before I even consider allowing any such implant. I'll go live in another country first!

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  199. That's the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ultimate goal of the cashless society has always been to eliminate anonymous transfers. It's cuts down on crime in a very Panopticon way. If you're paranoid that someone could always review all of your purchases, you're less likely to make ones which will be disapproved of. This works well both as a tool of law-enforcement and of jack-booted oppression (see "law-enforcement").

    It will happen one day. It is inevitable. I'm just hoping not to be alive by the time that comes around.

  200. Re:Why? Why?? by MrWa · · Score: 1
    Wrong place for this type of discussion, I'm sure, but the reason (I think...) that people don't welcome the coming on things like this is:

    they don't want to die or see the world end. There are not many people that anxiously await the coming of the Lord - they are too busy living and enjoying their life, only stopping long enough to bug others around them, trying to make sure other people are worried about the end of the world. When they see or hear things like this, it gets them scared because they honestly don't think it will, or want it to, happen during their life. The point is: there are constantly things that can be intepreted as being close to the end of the world...probably the point...people will always think it is happening soon and then it will happen when they least expect it.

  201. SHUT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SHUT UP YOU SINICLE CHRISTIANS!!! Why don't you see it these microchips as better security for all. And how many of us have forgot our wallets? with these chips you'll never forget your money again. Anyone who has a problem with these chips I suggest they get a life. Because this is the just the start of microelectronics. 20-30 years time you will not be able to see any machines because there going to be nano size. So you chrisitians better get on the band wagon before its too late.

  202. These Christians are wrong by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    Everyone knows that it's barcodes, not RFID, that encode 666. For those who don't know, the barcode sequence for '6' is used at the beginning middle and end of every barcode so that in effect all standard barcodes contain '6-6-6'. These Christians should be interpreting this as meaning that RFID is OK.

    Anyway, there's an espression known as having your cake and eating it too. These Christians may moan about the prophecy but the fact is they believe it. They believe the mark of the beast is inevitable and secretly welcome it knowing that it brings the apocalypse, and hence fulfillment of Revelations and the second coming, one step closer.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  203. argghh by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    Get your chips off me - you damn, dirty, computer!

  204. "imagine walking through a mall." by rah1420 · · Score: 1

    Heh. Don't have to. The first talking vending machine I saw was in a campground in the Poconos, about 30 miles from any civilization. And the frigging thing was telling me how happy it was to have been afforded the privilege to vend me a soda. Douglas Adams must've been spinning in his grave, and he wasn't even dead yet.

    I think if I started getting ads played to me in the mall that that would cement it. The End Times Would Be Here.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  205. Bicameral Mind by handy_vandal · · Score: 1
    --
    -kgj
  206. Store and share your music on implant by cattail.nu · · Score: 1

    Don't stop at using implanted chips just for cash. Make sure they provide a convenient storage for your favorite music. We need not fear the mark of the beast. The RIAA will put a stop to these.

  207. IDChip all over again? by Up'emInIrons · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just a rehash of the ID Chip Spoof from a couple years back? It seems very similar.

    Of course, I can't get to the referenced site because it's long since slashdotted...

  208. 666 by scubacuda · · Score: 1
    Here is an interesting page on 666.

    It just shows that you can make 666 with anything!

  209. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  210. Wonder how long cash will be around? by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    At this rate stores will stop taking cash at some point: "You want me to take this peice of paper? It might be forged. I'd have to make change. You'll have to go to the cash-only register. This is such a hassle!"

    I have as much desire to put a RFID chip in my arm as I do giving Radio Shack my phone number or getting one of those supermarket discount cards....

    OPT ME OUT.

  211. Re:Why? Why?? by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Actually, we welcome the Return of the King.

    So does most of Slashdot.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  212. If this IS the Mark of the Beast... by Monkey+Angst · · Score: 1
    ...then why do Christians have a problem with it? If Revelation is coming to pass as written, then wouldn't they welcome it? Sure, the time of the Beast is supposed to be pretty grim, but they don't have to worry about that, they'll get the Rapture and be gone, right?

    This is what has always puzzled me: Christians believe in an end-times myth which ends in good things for them, and they always try to forestall it. The point of a prophecy isn't "these things will happen unless you guys can somehow stop it," it's "these things will happen." Anything else isn't much of a prophecy. So for Christians, when the bad shit in the Bible starts going down, they should just sit back and relax, right?

    --
    stripShow - Where WordPress meets webcomics
    1. Re:If this IS the Mark of the Beast... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      ...then why do Christians have a problem with it? If Revelation is coming to pass as written, then wouldn't they welcome it? Sure, the time of the Beast is supposed to be pretty grim, but they don't have to worry about that, they'll get the Rapture and be gone, right?

      I've actually spent a bunch of time arguing points like this with the members of my wife's church, so I think I'm qualified to address this without going off the deep end to fundamentalism. I'll just say that at this time, I'm totally undecided on the whole "God" thing, but not being one to debate without doing some research, at least, I've read quite a bit of the Bible. I've even started to wearing a T-shirt to church dinners and such that one of the members gave me; emblazoned across the chest is the phrase "Token Heathen."

      The main problem comes in with what's left "undone" in the views of most Christians. One of the requirements of being a Christian is to spread the word of God and deliver the masses from the bonds of a non-Christian life. Since not everybody on the planet is Christian, it's a source of sadness or sympathy that these souls will be "unsaved" when Revelations comes to pass.

      Another component to this outrage over "Revelations-like" actions is the fact that Christians are human, just like you and me. When faced with the persecution described in Revelations, you can't help but dread it.

      This is what has always puzzled me: Christians believe in an end-times myth which ends in good things for them, and they always try to forestall it. The point of a prophecy isn't "these things will happen unless you guys can somehow stop it," it's "these things will happen." Anything else isn't much of a prophecy. So for Christians, when the bad shit in the Bible starts going down, they should just sit back and relax, right?

      Think of it this way, if it helps. Imagine that you were promised $1 billion, tax free cash, but the only catch was that you had to live through 6 months of being a social outcast, persecuted and possibly tortured for your beliefs. The situation is similar to what Revelations promises: you'll have to put up with some horrible crap in order to get your reward of living in Heaven. When present with a sufficient reward, people will endure amazing hardships; that doesn't mean they can't dread and fear the tribulation.

      It's kind of strange, but situations like the proposed RFID system give me pause. Revelations describes a time where those without the "Mark of the Beast" can't get even the basic services required for life. It sounds to me a lot like implanted RFID replacing money. But, then again, the same type of hysteria was when barcodes started appearing on products, so this probably won't be the last time the dreaded "Mark of the Beast" enters the technology spotlight.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    2. Re:If this IS the Mark of the Beast... by tylertherobot · · Score: 1

      very accurate, and since Nostradamus also predicts a lot of things that were in the bible, he said it'd happen a lot of times, he also said in the 3rd year would be a start of a great war, and the war we had this year (the third year) only lasted about 2 months (well, officially, it's still going on though) I think people should just see where it goes.

      --
      I wrote code so you didn't have to.
  213. For crying out loud... by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

    If you believe in this, it's okay with me. But please don't bother me with your evangelist conspiracy theories. There are more severe things to worry about than myths in an ancient book which have been used for centuries to prophecise that 'the coming of the anti-christ', 'the armageddon' (inser favourite end of world here) is just around the corner.

  214. Couldn't someone just use a RFID reader? by Brianwa · · Score: 1

    Couldn't a thief simply have a RFID reader in a public place, and collect all of the IDs? Then they could use an active RFID tag to transmit the ID, and use it like a stolen credit card. It would be easier than stealing cash/credit cards, and hard to track. They would need some sort of password system, I think it would still be quite insecure.

  215. Fundamentalism vs. symbolism by Boatman · · Score: 1

    You don't have to be a fundamentalist to learn something from the Bible.

    Your right arm symbolizes the effort you put into things. Your forehead, just as it does now, symbolizes the things you're always thinking about. Thus the law of Moses required, for certain religious observances, that the believer actually strap passages of scripture to their right arm and forehead (and put them in the front door of their homes). It's a pretty overt reminder to them of the principles that should be influencing their thoughts and actions. (And not too unlike the modern practice of wearing clothing that says "No fear!", "Eddie Bauer" or "Budweiser" in huge letters for all to see).

    The mark of the beast is the same concept - followers of the antichrist (think of him as a collection of all the ideologies that are harmful and destructive) will always have his principles on their minds and influencing their actions. And they'll require everyone else to do so as well, as much as they can. Revelations makes a lot of references to trade and commerce, so it's worth considering that those might be major tools of an Evil Overlord(tm).

    Especially considering that the law of Moses has so many provisions against ruthless business - believers were required to take care of the poor, loan to those in need without interest (usury), and weren't even allowed to accumulate lots of land (it all reverted to the original owner periodically).

    And if you don't get too distracted by the literalists (which most Christians aren't), you can see that the Bible's pretty acurate on this count, whether or not you believe in Jesus. When I was in grade school, kids told me explicitly that the reason I wasn't popular was because I didn't wear the right brand of clothes. Many people give up families and personal relationships because possessions and money get in the way. People starve because of greedy and corrupt governments.

    So the Bible's a pretty remarkable predictor of human tendencies that have stayed the same over thousands of years. Want to spend your time thinking about philosophy and developing relationships with your friends and family? Well, in *this* society you're going to have to put a lot of effort into making a lot of money before you can expect that kind of leisure.

    --
    --Just the place for a snark!
    1. Re:Fundamentalism vs. symbolism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thou shalt shut'th the fuck'th up'th ME:316

  216. I think you just saved me... by bhsx · · Score: 1

    I'm sitting here getting teary-eyed. I believe you just reminded me that God is with us. Thank you. I know this sounds stupid, but I'd given-up my faith for "scientific thought." I've tended to ridicule (in my mind) those that believe, brushing them off as morons, or low-brow. In fact, I grew up savagely religious, and by all means, God fearing. When I was 16 (I'm 31 now) I wanted, more than anything, to be a member of this completely hokey christian singing group after seeing them at one of our Lutheran youth conferences, which I travelled to Minneapolis from Chicago to attend. I don't even remember there name now, LOL the only thing I really remember about them is that one of the girls was fantastically hot, and that one of the guys was named Rusty Dick (just try growing-up with that one)!
    In summation:
    Thank you for reminding me why I loved God so much to begin with. I'm seriously crying.
    Thank you for posting such an altruistic and sincere thought here. Slashdot can be a harsh place for such honest emotion.
    Science and God do not have to be mutually-exclusive, I feel like I can have faith again.
    BTW, my sig is from The Simpsons, in the We Love You Marge episode, Homer sends Flanders a note to keep him away from Marge's party.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  217. Re:Why? Why?? by sharkdba · · Score: 1

    Actually, we welcome the Return of the King.

    So does most of Slashdot.

    Hehe, I would mod you funny if I didn't post to this discussion already. I'm glad someone has a sense of humor in this sober discussion. Guys, get a clue. It's technology, not some mumbo-jumbo Nostradamus|Bible|End of the world crap.

    You want to be a good Christian? Do good deeds in your everyday life. Wishing/hoping for some holocaust/wartime times is not a Christian think to do. People will die in such a time, you know? And as a Christian you should never wish anyone to die, not even enemies. Quite the opposite, work for some understanding instead.

    Gee, when had all these religions go so wrong about basic ideas... And why is it even discussed here?

    --
    The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  218. shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shit if this and the 2012 porficies are right im gonna die before im 21 (fuck no drinking for me) god as great as h is must be worried ill get drunk and screw something up. oh well *opens and tsing tao and drinks it down* there now that over with *runs around screaming were all gonna die* oh well thats my rant anyways im a christain and i dont mind gays does that mean im going to hell *think i sawe will and grace so im gonna goto helll* NOOO!!! it wasnt even that good anyways well i still think biometerics with voice alnasys would be good but whats wrong with a good old credit card (people used to get heavey wallets now you just wont be able to use one hand)oh and wake up people the end times are soon (i am a techie a avid christain and i dont goto church) ah well bye *zips out the door*

  219. Snag kids by JawFunk · · Score: 1

    Now I can just grab a kids arm and forcibly swipe it past a pop-machine whenever i'm thirsty...assuming he has money flowing through his veins.

    --
    [Please sign here]
  220. Before Ashcroft We had by Avihson · · Score: 1

    Janet Reno!

    Such a paragon of compassion and maternal tenderness.

    Democian or Republicrat, polar sides of the same corrupt coin.

    But at least we think we have a choice, not like those deluded other countries!

  221. Anti-kidnapping by JawFunk · · Score: 1

    If I was to kidnap a rich girl for ranson, I could care less if I carved out a chip from her arm when I know I can get 3 million dollars. I'm sure the parents would want the rest of the body back.

    --
    [Please sign here]
  222. Re:God Damn Fundimentalists by bmalia · · Score: 1

    'Cause if they don't, they'll goto hell!

    --
    There's no place like ~/
  223. Re:Why? Why?? by BeatlesForum.com · · Score: 1

    So basicly God is planning a mass murder again? And you people want to spend eternity with him???? There are several stories in the bible in which God killed off entire cities and he's supposed to be the good guy? Guess I'll be taking my chances with the devil then.

    Again, it's the choice of the people. People *choose* separation from God, not the other way around. God loves you whether you like it or not.

    Here's one way I look at it: would you rather live in a mansion in a city whose streets are of gold, or would you rather be tortured endlessly for eternity?

    --
    When millions disappear from earth, it's not aliens, it's the rapture.
  224. "Stop off for a drink..." by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hey, you wanna go grab a drink after work?"

    "Can't, I'm broke."

    "What? You've been working all this overtime, how can you be broke?"

    "Oh, no, I mean I'm 'BROKE'. I degaussed my monitor this morning and my RFID overloaded."

    "Man, I hate having to get surgery everytime that happens, I wish they'd just invent some kind of card we could carry around."

    "Yeah, me too, either that or maybe little pieces of paper we could carry around saying we have so much credit. We could then just barter with the pieces of paper."

    "You mean make money out of paper?"

    "Yeah. Exactly."

    "Weird."

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  225. Bad troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Do you have any idea how offensive you sound?

    Not at all, actually, unless you're desperately looking for it.

    He's not saying "the suffering of others doesn't matter" - that's totally in your head. He's saying "of all the terrible, terrible times in human history, the end times will be even worse, so why would I possibly want to look forward to that?"

    You sound irrationally biased against Christianity, which irks me because I like to see rational thought. Closed-minded fundamentalism is bad, whether it's Christian fundamentalism, anti-Christian fundamentalism (you), or any other kind. Closed minds lead to open wars.

  226. 777 not 666 by zison · · Score: 1

    Okay...

    First, UGW/RWX... user, group, world/read, write, execute. The universal access mode is 777, not 666. If the mode is 666, it means that no one can execute the file with that mode.

    binary decimal english
    100b (4d)means read only (no writing or running)
    010b (2d)means write only (no reading or running)
    001b (1d)means execute only (no reading or writing)
    101b (5d)means read and run, but no write
    110b (6d)means read and write, but no execute
    011b (3d)means write and execute, but no read
    111b (7d)means full access

    The mode is given in decimal for User, Group, World, so that 777 means anyone can do anything to the file, and 000 means no one can do anything to the file. 700 means user can rwx it, but no one else can do anything (saving, as always, root). 754 would mean that user can do anything (7d), other group members can read and execute it, but not write to it, and that the world (outside the group, user(owner) and root of course) can only read it, but cannot write it or execute it.

    666 means anyone can read or write it, but no one can execute it, (except again, root, the superuser, also sometimes refered to appropriately in this case, as God.) :)

    I am pretty sure that's all right, I may have slipped up on a detail here or there, but basically that's what that all means.

    So... back onto topic, I feel RFID implants are badwrong, or b'dong if you will, because:

    A- Unneccessary
    B- Eliminates annonymity ('cept on /.!)
    C- Potential alergic reaction/infection/rejection
    D- Would allow the authorities (boo! hiss!) to track the whereabouts of all citizens. Sacrifice freedom for the two seconds it takes to whip out a credit card? Are you HIGH??
    E- Cost
    F- Lack of security
    G- How's that "golden" (like that fooled anyone!) dollar coin replacement for the dollar bill working out? If you're in Denver, and your driving to Phoenix, how often will you see a sign telling you how many more KILOMETERS it is to your destination?
    H- "I don't want a red one, I want a blue one that flashes pink, can I get have one of those?"
    I- "You'll plant that chip in ma ahhrm after I plant this double-ought buck in your a$$!"
    J- "IT'S THE DEVIL!!!"
    K- "Well, M$ RFIDOS has just been hacked again for like... the fiftieth time... this morning..."
    L- "It's burning me! Get it out! Get it ouuuuut!"
    M- "Okay, I took two, but I still don't feel anymore convenient"
    N- "Oh I'm sorry, is that your RFID ringing or mine?"
    O- "Okay, the captain would like to ask, before we slam into the ocean at 600MPH, who was using the cellphone? Oh, you have an RFID. Nevermind.
    P- "Warning: The RFID tag in your arm contains chemicals known to the state of California to cause cancer, birth defects and other reproductive harm"
    Q- "No, I swear on my mother! I was taken abord their spaceship and they implanted... oh GOD! They got you too? You're... ONE OF THEM!"
    R- "In a party-line vote, the house passed a resolution requireing all RFID's and silicone breast implants to be removed from Americans arms, buttocks, etc., by not later than 30 October 2004

    Need I go on?

    Z

    1. Re:777 not 666 by StressGuy · · Score: 1

      "I may have slipped up on a detail here or there, but basically that's what that all means."
      .
      Yup, you missed a detail....
      .
      I said universal *device* access. In Unix, you can't execute a device. Therefore, universal access is given by mode 666. If this were a file, then the mode would be 777.

      --
      A goal is a dream with a deadline
    2. Re:777 not 666 by glindsey · · Score: 1

      If we're going to split hairs, let's not forget the fact that the mode number is 666 octal, which would actually be 438 decimal -- which, of course, means absolutely nothing, unless you want to postulate that Revelations predicted the use of a base 8 number system.

    3. Re:777 not 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem...

      The mode number is not 666 as in six hundred sixty six, it is mode number 6, 6, 6. The base of the number could be any as long as it has at least 8 total permissible marks. It could be base 987, and 0 through 7 would still be 0 through 7. Base 8 base 10 base 16, who cares?

      Hair is now split. Re-fuse?
      y/n

  227. You need to pay it more attention... by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    The post by 'Beatles Forum' is correct: Revelation is about things that have taken place after 70AD, things that are still going on today, and things that are yet to come. For eg: Revelation mentioned an army of 200 million soldiers - there weren't 200 millions *humans* at the time Revelation was written.

    Revelation is backed-up by the New Testament - for eg: in the gospels Jesus promises a second coming that will be visible around the world, in the letters of Paul, Paul talks about the anti-christ. The references to 7-hills, Rome, etc. in Revelation are correct - they map to Catholicism (whose headquarters is in Rome). Before you dismiss this out of hand, not that the Catholics have their own corresponding prophecy (made in the 11th century) of Rome being destroyed. From the Catholic Encyclopaedia (see third paragraph from the end):
    "The last of these prophecies concerns the end of the world and is as follows: "In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peter the Roman, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations, after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people. The End.".
    IIRC, we are now at the second-last pope according to the Catholic prophecy.

    [Note, I'm not condoning Catholicism - in Revelation God specifically asks his followers to "come out of" "Rome" so they don't "partake of her sins" (remember the massacres in the Inquisitions and the crusades?). If you want to know God, deal direct :) - read the Bible, tell God you're serious, love your fellow man... ]

  228. Correction by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    Small correction: The last paragraph should have read:

    God specifically asks his followers to "come out of" *her* so they don't "partake of her sins"...
    ("Rome" isn't mentioned by name in Revelation)

  229. Not a mark? by Dog135 · · Score: 0

    A hand gesture or a proclamation of alegence? Casheer: "That'll be $12.95, do you praise Bill?" Buyer: "Yeah" or optionally: Buyer shows casheer hand gesture when walking up with items. Hand facing forward with all but the middle finger up. (strains my hand just trying that)

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  230. I'm not even a Christian by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    and I'd NEVER get one of these.

    Sure, I believe that the Christians got that whole "son of God" thing wrong, but I'm not taking any chances. They might have gotten THIS ONE right.

    I'll stick to cash, check, and credit cards.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  231. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    This elimiates the anonymous purchase.

    no it doesn't.

    instantly a underground currency will emerge. be it old currency, canadian currency, or whatever there will ALWAYS be a way to get goods without tracking.

    do you really think that drug sellers and users will happily switch to the new government mandated tracked purchase system?

    nothing will change except the speed that honest people are funneled into criminal activities (2 years in prison for buying bread without approve funding sources...) in order to do what they have always done.

    It's rich guys that have no idea as to what reality really is, trying to control people...nothing more.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  232. 666 is distorted by language and time by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Excerpt from an interesting article about the whole 666 thing:

    Isolated down to the single verse of interest the translated Biblical text in question is: "This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six" (Rev 13:18, NRSV).

    The purpose of this study is not to add to the enormous literature about the apocalyptic images and this number. Entire books have been written on this subject[1]. Rather this study will concentrate only on the representation of the number six hundred sixty-six, arguing that to represent it as 666 (triple six) is an error. Such a representation can mislead modern readers towards false interpretations. It is a severely anachronistic representation.

  233. The 144,000 by Dog135 · · Score: 0

    Here's my take on it:

    144,000 people will be brought up in the rapture.

    Those 144,000 people never lied and are virgins.

    Afterwards, the tribulation occurs and people curse God for it. They then accept someone who's against God, and refuse money from those who worship God.

    So who are the 144,000? Children to young to speak. Too young to have lied yet. They won't be made to go through the tribulation and the people will hate God for taking them away. Only the truely faithfull will remain faithfull. God will show his powers at that time and people will believe in him. But most won't follow him.

    When it comes, we'll know it. This isn't it.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  234. Painful Upgrades by Xibby · · Score: 1

    Few issues that I see.

    As technology evolves, so must the chips, and if the chips are implanted, well...how many people really are going to accept a technology that requires surgery every 3-5 years? Every 5-7 years? 7-10? I doubt retailers are going to accept a technology that won't work for at least 20 years or more. So really, the product have to have a lifespan of what, 25-30 or more years to work?

    I hope the vulture capalitists who are funding this one are in it for long term...oh wait...that would be agnist everything that makes a vulture capalitist a vulture capalitist. ;)

    As for fundamentalist Christians, they could use a little religious apocalypse. It's a healty thing every 666 or so years...

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  235. What if no one uses it? by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

    Remember the Susan B' Anthony dollar? I can just see all the early adopters running around with shinny new RFID tags in there arm that no one has readers for. Honestly if we can't make a secure satelite tv, music, or DVD DRM system what makes them think they can secure this? Like it or not, there is a lot of grey/black market business that depends on cash and anoniminty of cash. I can't see any of those going away, even with digital cash and an audit trail. Those people aren't going to give up money making markets.

    1. Re:What if no one uses it? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Here's the fly in the ointment.

      The government would love to know exactly who "earned" how much, so taxes could be assessed.

      But the degree of difficulty in tracking it makes trying to account for it very impractical, that is they will spend several dollars worth of trouble for each additional tax dollar recovered.

      So, for now, they mostly tax just incomes of working people who work for corporations, which co-operate with the government ( as incentivized by tax write-offs to account for wages paid ) to finger who they paid what to. Many people in the "underground economy", paid by cash, don't pay near the going rate for tax, as there is no accounting for it. This is the reason a gardener can stay in business, when he "earns" substantially less per hour than the people he gardens for. When you earn money from anyone who needs your SSN, YOU are going to be responsible for the taxation of that money, but if you earn CASH, the person giving you that cash is essentially paying the tax on that money, so what you earned is completely yours... so you can expect to have to earn at least twice the hourly income if you work for someone who is going to report your income to the government as compared to someone who doesn't.

      The problem is that with the economy changing so that big corporations are "right-sizing", having fewer and fewer employees, these people simply don't cease to exist, many do things for cash for people who still have corporate jobs. Although, we are currently in a "jobless recovery", the fact that there is an economic recovery at all means money is still being circulated. But its in cash. Untrackable. Untaxable. The government must look for a greater and greater percentage of each remaining accountable person's income to support the tax base. The remaining people don't like this concept, with the resulting loss in motivation to work unless the company hiring them pays them enough not only to cover their living expenses, but also the enormous tax burden coming from accountability. So, the person you hire personally for $20/hour to work on your car at his house, will need somewhere around $60/hr if he's working for an employer who reports his income. As people become more and more as "independent contractors", this situation will get larger. Business must compete with the little guy. Business has economy of scale going for them, and the little guy has the simplicity of running his operation sans accounting overhead and shrinkage of his earnings via taxation. As we shift more from a manufacturing economy to a service economy, the individual can provide service, in many ways, superior service, to a corporate-based enterprise. Think car repair. Household services. Personal services, etc.

      Many of us no longer need the multibillion dollar corporate investments of manufacturing machinery.

      And hence, don't really need to mess with the corporation, their payroll departments, their huge chains of command, or bureaucracies, when we can work directly as an individual for our customer.

      As long as you can pay directly with cash, its very difficult to track and tax.

      Well, guess who passes the laws?

      Just as RIAA saw people making end-around-carries with their products, I'm sure the government, saddled as they are with enormous debt already, is waiting with baited breath for the technology to make every transaction a taxable affair.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  236. Re:...running out of time to accept Christ. by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    Ultimately everyone is judged by an infinitely wise, infinitely just, all-knowing God. Not only does he know what you did, but why you did it.

    Don't worry, everyone will get exactly what they deserve.
    There will be no plea bargins, no hung juries, no tampered evidence, no legal loopholes. Just perfect justice.

    I'm looking forward to the end of the world. Bring it on!

  237. What PIN? by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. How will a pin help if the machine decides to copy your pin as well? The only possibility would be if your number is given as encrypted and only approved machines can decrypt it. Or something.

    Disclaimer: I know nothing about credit cards and pins

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  238. I am not Christian, but I would rather die... by utahraptor · · Score: 1

    If I was a baby born 10 years in the future, I would hope for a time machine so I could go back in time and force my mother to have an abortion so I would not be implanted at birth.

    1. Re:I am not Christian, but I would rather die... by cranos · · Score: 1

      But if you go back and stop yourself from being born, how are you going to go back and stop your self being born?

  239. What Happens When... by voodoo_bluesman · · Score: 1

    you have to upgrade? I'd like to see how they address this issue.

    http://www.grabthemic.org

  240. i for one welcome the dawn of the rfid antichrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six." ~ Revelation

  241. "slaves" by Dog135 · · Score: 0

    Actually, the "slaves" in the bible were different then those of recent years. People went into slavery to pay off a debt. Others became slaves for free room and board. Slaves where basically working homeless people.

    Believe it or not, women are declared equal to men in the bible. When it says "All men are created equal", it means all mankind, not just men. God has spoken to women many times in the bible, and even had one woman (Debrah) kill the king of an invading army. Another woman, married to a king, helped prevent the Jews from being persecuted.

    The bible says women should submit their bodies to their husbands, so they're not led into temptation. (don't withhold sex, or they may be tempted to cheat) But it also says men should submit their bodies to their wifes for the same reason.

    It does say the man is the head of the household, but in those days, it was the man that brought home the money. (for the most part) And without some form of declared leadership in the home, there's often be a lot of fighting over decisions. Personally, however, I never see myself as the head of my home. My wife and I are able to agree on what needs to be done without arguing.

    btw: I don't believe these chips are the mark of the beast, but I still wouldn't take one. Not until they've been in use for many years without any problems.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  242. Was TBN Actually Right???!!! by voodoo_bluesman · · Score: 1

    One late night I was bored so I flipped on TBN for a good laugh. There was an extremely bad rendition of the 'end-days' scenario on this movie, but there was a company that brought it all about by deciding that they would build this implantable chip for consumers. My reaction was "bullshit, no one would possibly do this because the market isn't there. I wouldn't get one of these things installed..."

    Looks like TBN was right for once...

  243. Fundamentalist? by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    People use that term very liberally. I thought a fundamentalist was one who emphasised the importance of the basic, fundamental, essential aspects of their belief.

    On the other hand, an extremist will take something most consider to be at the edges, or obscure, and act as if it was fundamental.

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
    1. Re:Fundamentalist? by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

      I use the former as my definition, it wasn't supposed to be a put down. You're right though, it has been used recenty to describe Terra-rist-fanatics.

    2. Re:Fundamentalist? by swordfishBob · · Score: 1


      Personally I find it hard to describe the question of implants as "fundamental" to Christian faith at this time. I'd say the fundamentals have something to do with mankind's created purpose, our sin, Christ's fulfillment of the law, our forgiveness as a gift we cannot earn...

      There will be a day when the "mark of the beast" becomes a much more central issue, and arguably fundamental, but I expect it will be completely obvious at the time.

      --
      -- All your bass are below two Hz
  244. Very useful by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Banning cash would be the next great advance in finance. It will have backing from every business, as it will prevent theft. People will like the idea because it will prevent bribery. Think about it, would you steal/accept a bribe if the money went directly to your bank account? No more laundering money, either. If people didn't buy from you, you won't be able to say they did, cause everything will be written down in a database.

    And IT WILL BE ABUSED. Yes. Someone will abuse it.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Very useful by Mongo222 · · Score: 1

      How exactly will this prevent someone from walking into a store, picking something up, and walking out without paying for it?

    2. Re:Very useful by anubi · · Score: 1
      Eh... walk into the store.

      Pick up what you want.

      Walk back out.

      Sensor on store door notes your exit, your ID, item's ID, and processes the transaction.

      It will probably print you a sales slip on your way out.

      If you refuse the implant, or you can't pay, then alarms will sound unless you wait in a nice long line for manual processing.

      Did you think with all this technology available, we will still have lines and checkout stands?

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  245. No need for an implant... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    There's no need for these rfid devices to be physically implanted subcutaneously, with the attendant possibility for medical complications that could arise in a small percentage of such 'users.' Instead, they could just be permanently attached to a stainless steel collar that is welded around each user's neck.

    1. Re:No need for an implant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woof!

  246. Want one of these? - Then KISS your FREEDOM ba-bye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They will never force you to implant one of these... but they will indeed make life *extremely* difficule to live in modern society if these become well adopted. Allow me to explain:

    Imagine a world where the only method of purchasing was from one of these niftly gizmos that were to be embedded in the back of your hand. Mark of the beast? Definitely.

    Imagine if you or I chose not to use this mark, and we were faced with not having any way to buy food, gas, water or other life necessities.

    The US government has been using this technology for decades. Look up MKULTRA, and HAARP if you are interested in which ways they are commonly used.

    These chips are not only capable of storing data, but also capable of transmitting neurological signals and frequencies to receptors, which can be hidden in a rock, telephone pole, your cat or dog, or your neighbor.

    Essentially, what you think, feel, and experience can be broadcasted.

    Likewise, they can also receive signals and turn them into suggestions that your brain interprets.

    BOTTOM LINE - THESE ARE BAAAAAD, Mkay.
    Reference http://www.raven1.net/ for additional information.

    Beware, Be safe, and stay AWAY from these spawns of satan.

  247. Re:Why? Why?? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

    So in short it's "follow his rules or die" and in exactly what way does that have any difference with a dictator?

    Besides if God plays such games here, why do you think he isn't going to play games on you in heaven?

  248. To some extent, you're right by DrCode · · Score: 1

    I'm more careful to lock my doors when we're home then when away. It insures that someone who wants to get into the house won't be able to sneak in quietly, and that's the sort of person you really want to deter.

    If someone wants to break in when we're away, they're going to. If they have to break through a door to do so, the damage will probably be greater than what they steal. I know this from personal experience.

    It's similar with cars. A thief once broke my window to steal the stereo, which happened to be old, broken, and worth less than half the cost of the window.

  249. splitting hairs? by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    The RFID chip is a *device*, universal *device* access is mode 666. That's not a hair, it's the punchline.
    .
    I was always told it was BCD, but the man page does indeed say octal.
    .
    . ...BTW - this was just an observation, not intended to implicate Unix as the "OS of the beast" or anything.
    .
    Then again, perhaps the Revelations author does not count the thumb as one of your fingers ;) ....

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  250. Allow single button payment and wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For electronic wallets useability is more important than strict security, ideally you'd have both ...

    Make a card with a physical connector for when you want to be absolutely sure a connection cant get hijacked, and wireless for normal use. Also allow a user to commit to payment by just putting his finger on a button if he wants to (you can add finger print recognition even) make requests for pin a user-configuration.

    Punching in a pin with very small keys on top of a creditcard sized device is not for everyone.

  251. what the number means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the bible is written in Hebrew/Greek, and both cultures that used those languages understood under 'the number of X's name' the same concept, namely:

    -In both languages numbers were represented by letters in this way alfa =1, beta=2, gamma=3 (same for Hebrew, aleph=1...).
    So when one would take an arbitrary string of characters, such as a name, and counted up the numerical values of the letters, one would come up with a number.

    But it's a one way function of course, a given numbers has virtually unlimited possible combinations of writing it.

    The number of Jesus' name in Hebrew, if I recall correctly, is 777.

    So to get the number of the beast's name:
    -If it isn't in Hebrew/Greek, convert it.
    -Calculate Hebrew number.
    -Calculate Greek number.

    One should give you 666.

    Ascii doesn't count ofcourse, similarily we could use virtually any character encoding and alot of people's name could become 666.

  252. yeah, but... by zison · · Score: 1
    doesn't unix treat all things as if they were files? I.e.:

    Do wake up. Write(1) foot to /usr/slippers.
    mv self-bathroom. /sbin/pee -l | /usr/toilet
    make coffee -cream. Write(1) coffee to /dev/mouth

    If humans used Unix like computers do.

  253. Re:Why? Why?? by Carmelia · · Score: 1

    I'm in no way a Christian fundementalist (I'm atheist), but I sure as hell (it's just an expression, I don't think that hell exists) get freaked out when a paragraph written some 2000 years ago depicts something happening now, even more when it warns about the catastrophic consequences of the act.

  254. OMG what next!! by DocBaker69 · · Score: 1

    We already have a 'mark of the beast' in using a social security number to do just about everything in the US, and that is why there are people (like myself) who have become non-enumerated natural born citizens of the united States of America (notice united NOT capitalized). We the PEOPLE are sovereign NOT the frickin' gov't. This is an outrage to think of having some piece of technology embedded in your body, to go right along with your SSN! Instead of the Mobil Speedpass...it would be like the human tracking device of evil. Yes to have your pet have an ID chip in it is one thing but this!!! This is fuckin' nuts!!!

  255. Not quite by El · · Score: 1

    According to my schedule, we've only got until that expiration date there on your credit card reads 6/66... or about 60 more years. So they'll have to be conditioned BEFORE then! But don't worry -- our marketing and advertising professionals are hard at work turning men into sheep..

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  256. Re:Why? Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the fuck cares what the streets are made out of?

  257. This is already in place - for Pets by luckytroll · · Score: 1

    RFID tags have been implanted in North American pets now for years, as they dont get lost like tags do. Usually the glass-encased chip is injected in the loose skin of the neck or behind the ear.

    Soooo - will our pets be the first ones able to use this technology freely? How about a pilot project that allows pets to have an allowance and buy their own treats?

  258. 666 comments. How opportune. by gr3y · · Score: 1

    549 of 666 comments | yro.slashdot.org

    --
    Slashdot is my Mercer Box.
  259. The Bible prophecies the return of Israel by Micah · · Score: 1

    Here is one that IMHO is quite profound.

    Background: God repeatedly told the ancient Israelites that if they disobeyed His law, they would be driven out of their promised land. But not permanently. Indeed that happened.

    In spring or summer of the year 606 BC (verified historically), Israel lost its independence and the first deportation to Babylon occurred. The prophets predicted that this deportation would last 70 years, and indeed that was the case. A prophetic year in the Bible is always 360 days, not 365.25. 70 prophetic years/69.0 calendar years later, in 537 BC, Israel was allowed to return to their land. But some Israelites decided to stay in Babylon because they enjoyed the pagan life there.

    In Ezekiel 4:3-6, it is clearly pointed out that Israel's punishment for this would be 430 years of captivity. The original 70 years were included in this, so we have 360 prophetic years left. Indeed, in the second century BC, Jews had more independence than normal, if not a full-blown kingdom. But, alas, they did not repent and return to God.

    In Leviticus 26 verses 18, 21, 24, and 28, it is pointed out that the punishment for any continued disobedience would be multiplied by seven. If you take the 360 years that most of the Israelites were punished for continuing to live in their sin and multiply it by seven, you get 2520 prophetic years, or 907,200 days, or almost 2484 calendar years.

    If we add 2484 calendar years to 537 BC, taking into account that there is no year zero, we end up with 1948.

    Question for the history gurus: Do we know what happened in the spring of 1948?

    Right -- Israel became a nation again, thus ending the number of years of captivity that Ezekiel prophecied -- right down to the season (spring)!

    References:
    http://www.aboutbibleprophecy.com/e zekiel_4_3.htm

    http://yfiles.com/y3nf.html
    http://www.direct.c a/trinity/jerusalem.html (a follow up which aims to fix a perceived error in the above link)

  260. Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks to having muggers rip my hand off for my implant instead of just demanding my wallet.

  261. Re:Why? Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly, maybe he'll get bored and start off all the ridiculous "testing" again. Sounds like just the sort of thing this capricious "god" character would do.

  262. Mark My Ass by Sargerion · · Score: 1

    Whoever thinks putting an ID on yourself is some sort of demonic practice leading to the end of the world, or even thinks that it strips you from your originality, is just an idiot. I'm sorry, but such chips are nothing more than inevidable convieniances that will make our world more efficient. Now, granted, I wouldn't want EVERYTHING to depend on some unremovable ID tag. Only some services, and nothing relating to personal security, should use such a device, however I see such a device a useful and needed improvment to our ever-growing interdependant society.

  263. And the Lord said... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 1
    "Blessed are the geeks, for they have rejected the Mark in favor of anonymity, and they are my Children. They shall be given women and computers in My Kingdom, and the Marked shall lay at their feet with much wailing and grinding of teeth."

    And there is much rejoicing.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  264. Meatloaf, the Mark of the Beast and Metoroporisu.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    • Aggie walks into a bar with a big, steaming cowchip in his hands and shouts "Look what I almost STEPPED in!"

    ----- I didn't use to believe in Conspiracies... but that before I witnessed the power of the fully operational battlestation that is the Mass Media. The moment when it finally hit home to me that something sinister was going on was watching the Machine resurrect the career of Meatloaf right before my very eyes. Don't get me wrong, Meatloaf seems like a nice guy, but I'm just saying, "I Would Do Anything for Love (But I Won't Do That)" How does something like that just happen? His career was deader than Julius Caesar and whammo, suddenly, the song is NUMBER ONE! Hose me down with holy water if I get too hot? Are you kidding me? Number one song in America folks. #1. Meatloaf.

    And now we've got things far more nefarious than the lyrics of Jim Steadman to worry about, like a friggin chip that goes under your flesh and tracks every single place you might go and whatever it was you bought when you got there and there are people here so throughly manipulated that they root for it because anything that freaks the Bible-believing Christians out can't be all THAT bad, right?

    Wake up and smell what they're shovelling down your throat!

    A View to a Shill

    Andy Rooney shills the Mark to "the greatest generation." Andy Rooney saying "We need some system for permanently identifying safe people. Most of us are never going to blow anything up and there's got to be something better than one of these photo IDs - a tattoo somewhere maybe."

    Thank you Number 89, we'll deposit those work units in your account once we bring the Village fully online.

    For the WIRED generation, it's Kevin Warwick and his ilk. In an interview with Geek News, the Jaron Lanier of Cybernetics had this to say "I have read many letters and emails about the 'mark of the beast'. Although I do not consider myself to be a beast, if you actually read the passage in the bible [Heaven forbid!] then there may well be something in it! Essentially, it is saying that those who have the mark will be a part of the action, those that do not will be out of it. This could easily become true."

    Or how about this one, the DisInfo entry on Kevin Warwick. And of course, the crazed religious paranoia of religious cults who insist that the 'Mark Of The Beast 666' will take the form of microchips planted on the forehead and right hand of the unbelievers may just have a point after all.

    For the Baby Boomers, well, let's telecast the Jacobs' Family getting chipped on Good Morning America, the Today Show, Fox News, CNN, TelefrigginMundo for cielo's sake!

    Give it to Mikey. He'll eat anything

    In the words of Jacques Ellul "the educated man does not believe in propaganda; he shrugs and is convinced that propaganda has no effect on him. This is, in fact, one of his great weaknesses, and propagandists are well aware that in order to reach someone, one must first convince him that propaganda is ineffectual and not very clever. Because he is convinced of his own superiority, the intellectual is much more vulnerable than anybody else to this maneuver..."

    The completion of the Ziggurat...

    ...establishes our Metropolis | as the world leader...
    ....in industry, economics and culture.
    ....Thus is born a state that | will last a thousand years!
    ....I tremble at the honour | of announcing...
    ... the culmination of humanity's | long history of intellect and science.
    ....Our power spans the e

  265. Surgical procedure for your wallet by Tech · · Score: 1

    I don't see the benefit of an implanted RFID tag to replace cash. You're still going to have to carry a wallet around, unless the plan is a whole array of tags for the driver's licence, pictures of your SO, shopping list, etc. And I don't even want to know how they're going to implant a Durex, even less how you're meant to get it out again in a hurry.

    And of course, pickpockets are going to have to start carrying knives.

  266. In science fiction, number assigns YOU by tepples · · Score: 1

    There must be lots of people with the name 'jack' or 'leo' or whatever. there will be only ONE person called HUMAN_ID_0532134159123843892341 , that's a name that makes you totally unique.

    I have a refinement of your idea that's more palatable: Use the person's ID number to generate a more pronounceable first and middle name. Hasn't somebody suggested this in some well-known SF story?

  267. bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Religiouse loons and luddites aside this technology doesn't make any sense. We should instead be moving to trustless systems, not making our personal information MORE avalible. Even if the sensor needed close proximity how hard is it to walk up next to a guy. Stick a scanner in your pocket at a high enough setting and you can scan everyone you walk near.

  268. Re:The social implications make this non-feasible. by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
    [...]if you have absolute access to how someone spends their money, you essentially know everything about them.

    Great, now it'll be part of PATRIOT ACT III.

    I can't help but find it interesting that the "number of the beast" is also the Unix mode number for universal device access

    Whew, thank god I don't have to worry about being executed!

    --
    Fnord.
  269. Fun with misinterpreting the news! by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 0

    Subdermal RFID microchips to pay for goods?? What the hell? Would that mean that we would all need to carry surgery knifes with us so we can take those chips in and out of our bodies to pay for stuff?
    "Hi, I'd like to buy a coke."
    "Okay, that'd be 3 subdermal RFID microchip units."
    "All right." (rips himself a new one, takes out chip)
    "Damn, I only got a 5-unit chip!"
    "No prob, here's your change"
    "Thanks!" (rips himself another new one, puts 2-unit chip inside)
    "Thank you, come again"
    "I will... right after I come back from the hospital, I think I just cut one of my arteries" (falls to the ground, unconcious)

  270. err... Nope again by b3h · · Score: 1
    Any "body mark" that could be a *requirement* for global commerce just means that the Bible's predictions are right and the Christian can rejoice that the end is near. Yay!
    Either that or some enterprising businessman took the idea from the Bible. Kinda hard to say one way or another, isn't it?
  271. Re:Why? Why?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of us are.

  272. Re:Why? Why?? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    God has become more liberal since than. No more stonings, no more slavery, no more selling your daughters.

    Jesus is the original hippie liberal ;-)

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  273. Re:Bible has no contradictions by willtsmith · · Score: 1

    The only assumption science makes is that the rules of the universe have been effectively the same since the beginning. Futhermore, they will always be the same until the end.

    If you don't hold these assumptions reasonable, I suggest you stay off bridges and out of multi-story buildings.

    Creation Science isn't. That's because you're trying to prove a pre-ordained scenario. Literal interpretation of the bible. They tried this before with Copernicus and it ultimately made the church look like a bunch a jackasses.

    The biblical proof for a geo-centric universe is as profound as that of a 10000 year old earth. You are very certain and no amount of research or investigation will deter your faith.

    The faith of the scientist is a contradiction. The faith of science is skepticism. Individuals do get carried away, but the community must be swayed by reason and evidence.

    Most of all, scientists don't accuse each other of heresy for bringing up new theories. They don't call each other evil and servants of satan (though they can get a little bitchy with their rivals).

    Any sufficiently weak argument will almost inevitably be credited to god as a last gasp effort for legitamicy.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  274. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    It's called a wakeup call. The wakeup calls that Germans failed to heed eventually built the ovens.

    Son, we are building execution machines in Guatanamo NOW. Courtesy of Haliburton. The ovens are firing up, and I am screaming NOW before they get the idea that I would make a nice souffle.

    This all is a process. It takes time. But it is easily monitored, if you clean the crud from your eyes and actually watch what is happening.

    The FBI now equates protestors with terrorists, as of two days ago. Police are slamming protestors into the ground with no excuses or consequences. "1st Amendment zones" are established to imprison dissenters when the President comes by. We have torture camps in Cuba, thousands of men locked in the dark, we're shipping secret prisoners to really GOOD torturers overseas, we've been looted blind, we've been led into a stupid, useless war... what the HELL ELSE DO YOU THINK GIVES US A CLUE WE'RE GOING DOWN GERMANY'S PATH?

  275. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Oh, and yes, I do know they will eventually put me in a file, if they haven't already. And I do know that if it really goes bad, I get to disappear forever.

    It's called fighting back instead of giving in. Life, fortune, sacred honor sort of thing.

    They came for the trade unionists, and all that.

    You don't wait until there is no one left to speak for anyone.

  276. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by beakburke · · Score: 1
    "Son, we are building execution machines in Guatanamo NOW. Courtesy of Haliburton. The ovens are firing up, and I am screaming NOW before they get the idea that I would make a nice souffle."

    Care to back that one up????

    --
    ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
  277. Other payment types are not going away... by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1
    Even if this finally becomes acceptable to people, which I seriously doubt, other payment types are not going to go away no matter how prolific this gets. Just look at the all the other payment options. Cash and other valuables have always stayed around. Cheques, Credit Cards, Debit Cards are all extremely prolific, but everyone still has cash. No self respecting politician will ever outlaw cash, because they don't want their kick-backs being traced. In war zones, if you want to get past the Gestapo at the checkpoint, you don't bribe them with a Visa. You give them the ring off your finger, or the gold watch off your wrist.

    But I don't think this technology will take hold for the simple fact that people don't want to have something done to their bodies that isn't necessary...okay so this *will* be a big hit in Beverly Hills, but besides that.

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  278. Implant: right hand or forehead, ma'am? by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    The devil has power over the world. People who serve money belong to the world. When this subdermal business becomes required upon pain of death, then you can start listening to the clamoring of the end-time-focused Christians' warnings. Until then, just listen to the message of love they are supposed to be sharing (instead of this doom and gloom stuff).

    This is precisely why this dog won't hunt. In the hugely successful "end times" potboiler series "Left Behind" which was ghost-written for Christian author Tim LaHaye, they specifically mention people being "chipped" like cats and dogs and that this would be the Mark of the Beast. If this ever comes out as a consumer product, let alone if it becomes a requirement, there will be thousands and thousands of "Christian Patriots" running to their bunkers and arming themselves to the teeth.

    Also, for those who mention that this would be Attorney General Ashcroft's dream, remember that he, too, is a fundamentalist Christian who believes that the Bible is the Word o'Gawd and that the book of Revelation is CNN from the future. He's not going to let this happen. He'll be more than happy to issue you a card you have to carry on pain of death, or require the use of biometric ID you have to register for on pain of death, but not something that you implant or tattoo. Nuh-uh.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  279. Re:Why? Why?? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    So in short it's "follow his rules or die" and in exactly what way does that have any difference with a dictator?

    Well, the difference is that you could theoretically depose a dictator through bloody revolution, but as God is omnipotent, ain't no one gettin' Him off'a His Throne. So when He says "jump", you'd best be three feet in the air, asking "when can I come back down?"

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  280. Re:Why? Why?? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

    Heh. Good thing I'm not Christian. Right?

    --
    i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
  281. Waking up in an ice cube filled bath tub. . . by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

    I can imagine, you all know the "hoax" about waking up in a bath tub full of ice, and having an incision (sp?) in your side. Now people will just wake up with a cut arm, and all their info/money/whatever is gone.

    I can just imagine the number of sci-fi/horror flicks with this premise. But seriously, who would want to be implatned with a unique identification tag?

    --

    YOU'RE WINNER !
    Another lame blog

  282. Yeah, well, that sounds like a pretty good deal. by I+am+Jack's+username · · Score: 1

    How about, I give you the finger... and you give me my new cell phone.

  283. This actually is in the bible by tylertherobot · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'll find the verse and post it here, but it actually is in the bible & Nostradamus predicted it, I'm not looking the stuff up now because it's 4 in the morning and I'm tired, but if I get a chance later I will.

    The thing is, the whole 666 thing goes with bar codes, bar codes are assigned certain numbers for each type of good they represent. When the left number, middle number, and right number are all 666 supposedly that'll be the number of the beast, and if you look now, two of those 6s are already in place on certain products

    I'm not a hardcore Christian guy, but it is kind of erie how close to truth the bible is becoming, and how close Nostradamus' predictions are coming together.

    --
    I wrote code so you didn't have to.
  284. Well, fuck by can_dcm · · Score: 1
    I was just having a converstion recently about how dystopian futures described in fiction are creeping up on us: this would have been a perfect example. shrugging towards gomorrah.

    I know we are living in a particiarily virulent era of corporate control, but I hope the general public regards this a fucked up and ignores it.

    There really needs to be a law where we can challange corporate leaders to hand-to-hand comabt for inflicting stupid shit on the world.

  285. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by instarx · · Score: 1

    What convoluted psuedo-logic you speak. To say that we don't live in an increasingly oppressive police-state because people are openly complaining about their rights being violated is just weird. By speaking up and putting our freedom on the line there is still a chance to avoid the fate of actually having an Oberfuhrer Ashcroft.

    And I always thought the 9/11 attacks had something to do with US policy decisions in the mid-east. Saying that the prohibition of contact with domestic FBI and non-domestic intelligence-gathering services CAUSED 9/11 is wrong. I won't even give you that they may have ALLOWED it to happen. The FBI knew that people listed as suspected terrorists were taking flying lessons and not bothering to learn how to land, but they chose to ignore the report from their field agent. Incompetence ALLOWED it to happen.

    And by the way, WHAT &^$*@ RECOVERY? So we gained 22,000 jobs last quarter - we're still 500,000 in the hole.

  286. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by instarx · · Score: 1

    Son, we are building execution machines in Guatanamo NOW. Courtesy of Haliburton. The ovens are firing up, and I am screaming NOW before they get the idea that I would make a nice souffle.

    I would be a little surprised if this were happening (yet), but not terribly so. Are these metaphorical execution machines or is there something we should know about?

    Very telling, however, is that no one asked you to back up the rest of your post.

    Also, you forgot to mention people taken off the streets without warrants, locked in prisons without charge and not allowed to speak to anyone. The government won't even say if they are being held or not. I saw pictures last year of mothers outside a prison holding signs with pictures of their sons - just wanting to know if they were in the prison. This was in AMERICA - "land of the free" - and not in Pinochet's Chile.

    Anyone who doesn't see that we're all heading down right-wing rat hole is wearing blinders.

  287. Chips are worse than you thnk by instarx · · Score: 1

    If you have an RFID implant the government will be able to track you anywhere you go simply by placing passive RFID scanners on the street. They will also be able to tell who you are walking with and who you know. But this ability isn't confined to implanted RFID tags, they can do the same with any RFID tags in your clothes! So ID#347654-0 shows up at an anti-war rally and guess what, that shirt was sold to YOU, John Smith, at the Eugene, Oregon Eddie Bauer store. (And by the way, why were you in Eugene, Oregon in July 2003?).

    Think you can pay for your clothes with cash and avoid it? Nope, all it takes is for you to identify yourself once at any government office or airline check-in counter having a scanner for all your tags to be assigned to you.

    RFID tags in clothing is the holy grail of a police state. RFID tags give our government "internal security" abilities that Stalin and Hitler only dreamed about.

    .

  288. Re:Bible has no contradictions by SLi · · Score: 1

    I hold these assumptions entirely reasonable, at least as long as they concern only things like the fundamental laws of physics and as long as "since the beginning" is defined to mean "from a certain point on" (just like the big bang theory). Yet the concrete evidence based on these assumptions only to disprove the young earth theory and specification by devolution hasn't been found. Furthermore, specification by devolution can give reasonable explanations to a great amount of evidence discovered that just doesn't seem to fit into evolution theory, as well as the lack of evidence for lots of things evolution theory is fundamentally based on and for which evidence should rationally thinking have been found.

    There is no such thing as a biblical proof for a geocentric universe. The fact that biblical accounts have been used by Christians to "prove" things like this (and to legitimize lots of wrongdoing) proves only that we Christians are humane and prone to err just as any other people.

  289. Of course the CEO would be quoted saying that.... by macraig · · Score: 1
    Of course the CEO (Scott Silverman) would be quoted as saying that their product could replace credit cards: he has personal stock options and hungry venture capitalists to consider. To any healthy skeptic, though, it should sound like little more than Ye Olde Wishful Thinking.

    I'd like to know, though: what's to stop talented thieves from eventually cutting it out of their arm/whatever, hacking the daylights out of the thing and replacing it... or perhaps even doing it in-situ?

    Turkeys south of the Canadian border are an endangered species today....

  290. Re:Why? Why?? by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Think about the last time you deleted a program.

    In some respects, a computer program could be considered a living thing, albeit on a much lower level. So would that make deleting a program murder? After all, you created it and it belonged to you.

    Considering that God created the universe, and all living things, I think that he has the right to do with His creations as wishes. If some of his creations do things which displease him, he is well within his rights to "delete" them.

    People of leisurely moral growth often fail to recognize the difference between killing and murder. Killing, while undesirable, is not necessarily wrong in itself (for example, killing in war or self defense). The sin of murder is committed when one's respect for God sinks so low that they kill the image of God (mankind) for the sake of their own personal desires.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  291. why not both? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Either that or some enterprising businessman took the idea from the Bible. Kinda hard to say one way or another, isn't it?

    Who says the 2 are mutually exclucive?

  292. Re:Fess up. Are you suicidal or just goofin' on us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > > Son, we are building execution machines in Guatanamo NOW. Courtesy of Haliburton. The ovens are firing up, and I am screaming NOW before they get the idea that I would make a nice souffle.
    >
    > I would be a little surprised if this were happening (yet), but not terribly so. Are these metaphorical execution machines or is there something we should know about?
    >
    > Very telling, however, is that no one asked you to back up the rest of your post.

    Dude, the guy couldn't even be arsed to spell "Halliburton" correctly. Why would anyone think he could back up his ridiculous allegations?

  293. Biometrics is better by dmonkey · · Score: 1

    face print, finger print, retina print, and voice print can all be done passively with out your permission and no one has to insert anything into to you. You could just as easily attach a Visa account to your eye print. Don't want a chip, don't get one.