Slashdot Mirror


NYT Discovers Internet's Wild Side: IRC

maztec writes "The New York Times (free soul-sucking registration required) published an article today entitled The Internet's Wilder Side. Apparently, according to the article, 'the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb , [but] a little-known neighborhood known as Internet Relay Chat remains the Wild West.' In essence the article concerns itself with how IRC is the breeding ground of all the Internet's Evils, from animal pornography and illegal file sharing to virus making and computer cracking, it all starts here. I'd continue pointing out interesting quotes, but that'd be a waste. Go read it yourself. And if you're on IRC, remember, you're evil. Even if you're one of those do-gooders who uses Mozilla, LFS, or FreeNode servers for software development."

627 comments

  1. God forbid by Corbets · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait to see what happens when they discover newsgroups. Man, their heads will pop. ;)

    1. Re:God forbid by ErisCalmsme · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Haha you beat me to it man! Newsgroups should be whispered, not spoken aloud lol. Let's keep it our little secret shall we?

      --
      Chaos is Divine *
    2. Re:God forbid by JaffaKREE · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always suspected I was an evil, conniving, warez trading, mp3 album pre-releasing, movie theater recording and distributing bastard from the moment I typed /server irc.dal.net lo those many years ago. Now I know for sure. Time to go kill some puppies and take pictures and post them in #MurderedPuppies.

    3. Re:God forbid by GreyPoopon · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I can't wait to see what happens when they discover newsgroups.

      This has already happened to one of the Philadelphia news channels, although I must say that they have no clue what newsgroups really are. They ran a special feature about Voicenet, accusing them of supporting child pornography and all kinds of things. They showed the police going into the office and seizing Voicenet assets. I was shocked when it first came on. About twenty minutes into it, I became surpised at just how idiotic the whole thing was. It was all about the "Quickvue" search tool that can basically thumbnail internet content, in particular Usenet newsgroups. Apparently, a number of people were using the tool to thumbnail some of the alt.binaries.*.erotica.* newsgroups with child pornography. The news made it sound like all of this was the fault of Voicenet, and that they were doing something sinister. When Voicenet responded that they were not really able to police the content of the newsgroups, the TV station asserted that this was ridiculous, making it sound like an easy task to monitor every single post that comes into every single of the 120,000+ newsgroups out there for banned content. Just for the record, the servers were seized in January and no charges have yet been filed against Voicenet. I think the authorities are looking for subscriber lists to go directly after people viewing the content. I'm not sure if the seizure was really legal, though.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    4. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or MUDs... ...and don't forget the first bomb building sensationalist pieces were about the same from BBSes, but I guess that being found on the internet made it a "new" story...

      Think that someone should clue them in about the wheel too?

    5. Re:God forbid by Alexis+Brooke · · Score: 5, Funny

      This IRC thing sounds pretty bad. I can't wait for the New York Times to do a report on the 1995 documentary "Hackers".

      --
      This is a special excite .sig
      This
    6. Re:God forbid by in7ane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The pirated copies of music, films, games and other software were generally distributed using a separate Internet file-transfer system"

      You are right, and they are getting close as well.

      With newsgroups it will be even better though, since the groups are actually stored (possession) on company owned servers somewhere, which people pay subscriptions (profit) to access the messages (distribution) from - no, don't give them the idea... (actually I do wonder, how to the 'complete' newsgroup providers get away with this?)

    7. Re:God forbid by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can't wait to see what happens when they discover newsgroups. Man, their heads will pop. ;)

      Heh. Newsgroups are less interactive, so I bet they wouldn't be as impressed. They can't watch live conversations between skript kiddiez and warez d00dz, so it'll have less "punch". Personally, that's what I like about newsgroups-- not having to talk to a 14 year old doofus and stroke his tiny ego enough to give me what I'm looking for is worth the spam-wading.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah.. i just set this thread to the topic in #stile. /me cackles demonically

    9. Re:God forbid by Jack+Comics · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just FYI, you can find a transcript of the local news station's (WPVI's), report here. WPVI even takes credit for informing the local police. If anything, what WPVI did was abuse of journalism, IMO. They in effect created their own story, and effected the operation of a large ISP as a result.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    10. Re:God forbid by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I've been looking for that for a couple months! I couldn't remember which station it was.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    11. Re:God forbid by pyros · · Score: 5, Funny

      First rule of Usenet: You do NOT talk about Usenet!!

    12. Re:God forbid by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 3, Funny

      On'tday alktay aboutyay ethay ewsgroupsnay!

      --
      I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    13. Re:God forbid by ConversantShogun · · Score: 1

      "Subscriber lists"? I thought newsgroup subscription was a locally-maintained state.

      --

      --When you buy proprietary software, you don't get better software. What you get is the right to complain about it.
    14. Re:God forbid by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      dude - i knew a couple guys working voicenet, and i gotta tell ya - i wouldnt be surprised if they were doing slightly less than legal shenanigans.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    15. Re:God forbid by caluml · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. IRC + newsgroups = the original P2P and IM. alt.binaries.movies.divx or alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.* anyone?

      Why hasn't someone set up a second internet over the main one, where IP allocation is dynamic, and untracable? You're only tracable through your IP address, so if you get allocated a random one, and routing still works, and you throw in a little IPsec, voila.

    16. Re:God forbid by caluml · · Score: 2, Funny
      and effected the operation of a large ISP as a result.

      They started up their own ISP? Wow, that's evil tactics.

    17. Re:God forbid by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      /topic NYT needs to hire some people who actually know about this whole "Internet" Thing. /me thinks that they are a bunch of fucktards. /kickban NYT
      * NYT has been kick banned from [*.*.*.*] *

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    18. Re:God forbid by pete.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Police, FBI, and other law enforcement agencies don't seize computer equipment unless it is directly involved in a commision of the crime (such as a hackers PC). If they need the data they take dd copies with them for analysis later. In teh case of Contraband such as child porn it would be eliminated before they left.

    19. Re:God forbid by 3Suns · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Next thing you know they're going to be finding UPS liable for shipping boxes of contraband information.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    20. Re:God forbid by cshark · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was some of the most irresponsible journalism I've seen in a long time.

      First off, since when is the www a "well policed little suburb?" There's just as much shadiness on the web as there is on IRC. And it's super easy to get at. Just enter it into Google, and you're on your way. All without even touching IRC.

      The author also made some funny contradictions. Like the part where he says there are only 50,000 people on all of IRC on at any given time. And then in the next paragraph and the rest of the article he goes on to say how there's no way to know how many people are online. Funny, but a NYT editor should have caught that.

      The article was big on assumptions, and short on fact. If they really wanted to bring it home, they should have interviewed a virus writer or hacker who actually uses the system for this kind of thing. That would have made it an interesting piece.

      And rather than going on about how bad the thing is, the author should have proposed a solution, or spoken to someone who offers a solution.

      I don't know.
      A lot of this should have been covered in Journalism 101. I guess if the point of the article was fear mongering of the technically challenged, it got it's point across. But it seemed kind of yellow to me.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    21. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      wait till they find out windows 2000 server has telnet! the sky is falling the sky is falling!

    22. Re:God forbid by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I am SO grateful! Here I was on efnet hanging on #linuxhelp. To THINK of the potential danger I was in...

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    23. Re:God forbid by rudeboy1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just got done reading that "article."
      I didn't realize they gave jobs to people who were that bad at journalism.
      ""Can you tell us why the police were here a couple of weeks ago?"
      "I have no idea, I wasn't here."
      "Did you have child porn on your web site?"

      What the hell? They don't list his response to the last question in the article. What kind of a statement is that? The whole article reads like a nosy neighbor telling all about someone she called the cops on. I live in a small town in FL, but here, when they do a "investigative report," it is at the very least somewhat legitimate. They show you pictures of flies on hamburger about to be cooked and served, or something like that. Do these guys advertise as a news channel or a tabloid show?

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    24. Re:God forbid by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Just wait till NYT find out about this , then they'll go real bonker: imagine that, Morse code sub-channels on IRC, probably for 3v1l spies and terrorists or something!

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    25. Re:God forbid by Torne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Police, FBI and other law enforcement agencies seize computer equipment *all the time*. Then if what you're being accused of is pretty unimportant, it'll sit on a shelf in an evidence locker someplace for three months before any forensics guys even take a look at it. This happened to a friend of mine. The police who arrive at the office/your house/whatever know what computers look like, and might have one 'expert' with them, but they will never just take copies of your data, they will take whole machines, even whole networks.

      If a computer has had kiddy porn on it, they typically destroy the computer. The whole thing. Maybe the monitor too for good measure. They're not polite about this kind of thing.

    26. Re:God forbid by Kombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If anything, what WPVI did was abuse of journalism, IMO.

      One man's "abuse of journalism" is another man's "Freedom of the Press."

      Watch out, lest I report you for "abuse of speech."

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    27. Re:God forbid by Skjellifetti · · Score: 5, Informative

      Did you read the same article I did?

      First off, since when is the www a "well policed little suburb?"

      Actual quote from NYT:

      Even as much of the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb, a little-known neighborhood known as Internet Relay Chat remains the Wild West. While copyright holders and law enforcement agencies take aim at their adversaries on Web sites and peer-to-peer file-sharing networks like Napster, I.R.C. remains the place where people with something to hide go to do business.

      Sounds like a reasonable statement to me. The cops ARE going after child porn web sites and p2p networks.

      The author also made some funny contradictions. Like the part where he says there are only 50,000 people on all of IRC on at any given time. And then in the next paragraph and the rest of the article he goes on to say how there's no way to know how many people are online. Funny, but a NYT editor should have caught that.

      Actual NYT quote:

      Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time, and many of them are engaged in legitimate activities, network administrators say. [SNIP] It is almost impossible to determine exactly how many people use I.R.C.

      Note the careful use of qualifiers probably vs. exactly.

      The article was big on assumptions, and short on fact.

      Actual NYT quote:

      "I.R.C. is where all of the kids come on and go nuts,'' William A. Bierman, a college student in Hawaii who helps develop I.R.C. server software and who is known online as billy-jon, said in a telephone interview. "All of the attention I.R.C. has gotten over the years has been because it's a haven for criminals, which is a very one-sided view.
      "The whole idea behind I.R.C. is freedom of speech. There is really no structure on the Internet for policing I.R.C., and there are intentionally no rules. Obviously you're not allowed to hack the Pentagon, but there are no rules like 'You can't say this' or 'You can't do that.'"


      The article was full of well researched facts including interviews with the authors of the most popular IRC software.

      I guess if the point of the article was fear mongering of the technically challenged, it got it's point across. But it seemed kind of yellow to me.

      The article wasn't aimed at you. It was aimed at the general public. It was fairly balanced and described the good, the bad, and the ugly of IRC. You've just got your panties in a twist because you think you're an l337 d00d.

    28. Re:God forbid by atomic-penguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Reporting factual inaccuracies against a group or a person, is not "Freedom of the Press". It is "Abuse of Journalism. Haven't you ever heard of something called "libel" or "slander"?

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    29. Re:God forbid by Kombat · · Score: 1

      What "factual inaccuracies" were in the NYT article? I don't deny the negative spin, but I don't recall anything that was actually, demonstrably, factually incorrect.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    30. Re:God forbid by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      The greatest threat to file-trading in newsgroups is the user. alt.binaries.movies.divx has lately been getting flooded with captured TV shows (post that these are off-topic and you are an ingrate whiner); it will soon be as unwieldy and unfocussed as alt.binaries.multimedia.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    31. Re:God forbid by aka-ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Examine the thread you are posting in, this subdiscussion concerns a TV news channel, not the NYT. The ISP is suing the prosecuter, check it out.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    32. Re:God forbid by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Well not according to here

      As you can see there is about 1.2 Million people on IRC. Even including clones (people on more then one network) there surely is more then 50,000 people on IRC at one time. Also what about the small networks that are not on that list but exist. I run a small one my self. It doesn't take much to get one going. 2 Servers and hybrid. Also running your own network ensures that all the "problems" of the bigger networks (floods and idiots) are not a problem.

      [14:10] ùíù There are 5561 users and 116121 invisible on 52 servers
      [14:10] ùíù 401 IRC Operators online
      [14:10] ùíù 45736 channels formed
      [14:10] ùíù I have 7408 clients and 1 servers
      [14:10] ùíù Current local users: 7408 Max: 7846
      [14:10] ùíù Current global users: 121682 Max: 125316
      [14:10] ùíù Highest connection count: 7847 (7846 clients) (136448 connections received)

      That is EFnet alone. Although im sure enough of them are bots it's still alot of people.

    33. Re:God forbid by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      You're thinking NNTP and standard newsreader. Their "quickvue" service was web-based.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    34. Re:God forbid by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Mostly I agree with your analysis of the piece, but I do wonder why my Googles on "William A. Bierman," "William Bierman"+IRC and Bierman+IRC provide nary a clue of this guy's expertise in the realm of IRC software.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    35. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you have kiddie porn on you computer and a friend turns you in for the Crime Stoppers reward, the police take your computers and anything that is connected to them including the speakers and your tool kit, and put it on the evening news. They catalog it all and give a list to your lawyer, and schedule a hearing for possibly getting it back, but part of the deal to plead to a lesser charge to not try to get it back.

    36. Re:God forbid by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      Not directed at you, but even if it was standard NNTP and newsreader, a non-technical site could use the phrase "subscriber list" to mean the access log to the NNTP server.

      If logged, the logs can store the newsgroup accessed, the article accessed, and the time/IP address etc.

      This list of "newsgroups accessed" could be something non-techies may use the phrase "subscriber list" for.

      --
      Sig out of date
    37. Re:God forbid by LittleDan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This is what I hate about slashdot: the rampant agism. Everyone thinks that a computer user who's between the ages of 12 and 15 is automatically a script kiddie. That is just completely false. I don't know the first thing about being a script kiddie, only about programming and teaching people to program (when it comes to computers, that is). This is really annoying how everyone prejudices people like me (I'm 14) to be arrogant, stupid crackers.

      Daniel Ehrenberg, aka LittleDan

    38. Re:God forbid by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Heh, for joe user, usenet is way too cumbersome to bother with, even with nice gui tools to automate a large part of it..
      multipart encode? par files??? I see their eyes going blank.. so well. not too much to fear there for a while I think ;)

      Is it me or is the name usenet in this case a bit ironic?

    39. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did they arrive in black helicopters too?

      Obviously, you do not watch the television news or read newspapers, because this kind of shit happens a lot. And it isn't even kept secret.

      You can make fun of the other poster... but you are the one who has no grasp on reality.

    40. Re:God forbid by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      It's because our age group is embarrassed by the fact that most of those arrogants assholes are in their 20s or 30s, and the reason they're so arrogant is because they've become fixed on a specific mindset and are so certain of their righteousness there's no reasoning with them.

      Plus it's easier to blame shit on a faceless, nameless, teenager.

    41. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not talking about the NYT, idiot.

    42. Re:God forbid by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sorry but lets look at the web and then see if its a well maintaned suburb. Just like a real suburb, once you scratch the surface you see the crap underneath that makes city life so fulfilling.

      1. Fake amazon, paypal ,etc sites. It doesn't matter if they get pulled down, within minutes they have your credit card number. How often do people drop their cc number in newsgroups or irc?

      2. Spyware. Lots of it. Misleading ads. Electronic extortion "look we can open your cd drive with activex, pay us 20 dollars for "security software"

      3. Web exploits.

      4. Ads and cookies compiling data about your surfing.

      5. Sites that teach hacking, p2p info, etc that no one on irc would bother to tell n00bs.

      Seems to me the web is a lot more dangerous for users than irc and newsgroups combined.

    43. Re:God forbid by Ykant · · Score: 5, Funny
      Next thing you know they're going to be finding UPS liable for shipping boxes of contraband information.

      Quiet, man - I need my cigars!

      --
      Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
    44. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Agreed. The people on here seem to assume that because 90%+ of the idiots doing this are younger than 15, means that 90%+ of the people under 15 who like computers are doing it. When you talk in complete sentences, use punctuation, and don't mix up numbers and letters people always seem surprised to find you're not a college graduate.

      Another annoying thing is people forgetting what ages mean - they were 14 once in their life also, yet it seems they mix it up with being 6. I remember one article about police cracking down on script kiddies, which included the phrase "13 year olds worldwide shaking in their Pampers". How many 13 year olds do you know who wear diapers? Do these asshats feel the need to insult people for the power trip, or just to compensate for small e-peens?

    45. Re:God forbid by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think so, really. There's a reason you can't drive until you're 16... it's because you aren't capable of making good decisions until then, and often much later than that. The key is MOST people. There are always exceptions, but for the most part, if you're a 'kid', you aren't emotionally mature enough to be more than a pest.

    46. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NYT actually quoted 500,000 people. Your parent poster was a Chicken Little moron.

    47. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      By that logic, you shouldn't be allowed to drive until you can get a minimum score on a standard IQ test, or perhaps something like a logic exam. You know, to weed (hyuk hyuk hyuk) out the people that feel like getting high and driving at high speeds through cop conventions would be a good idea.


      Of course, then the legal profession would probably collapse.

    48. Re:God forbid by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      So, Inotherwords, they took the entirty of the word "internet" and comrpessed it down to IRC.

      Have they tried typing porn into google, or are they just so dumb they can't see the obvious? Or is it, just mabye, NYT has an intrest in making the rest of the internet seem like the dumping ground of the corrupt side of human kind so they can keep their buisness of lieing and making a profit going as usual? :O

    49. Re:God forbid by AndreyF · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't someone set up a second internet over the main one, where IP allocation is dynamic, and untracable? You're only tracable through your IP address, so if you get allocated a random one, and routing still works, and you throw in a little IPsec, voila.

      Something like this? :)

    50. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Search 'billy-jon irc' and you'll get results.

      Thank you for playing.

    51. Re:God forbid by AmoebafromSweden · · Score: 3, Funny

      >Time to go kill some puppies and take pictures >and post them in #MurderedPuppies.

      Great idea!

      I'll join you there!

    52. Re:God forbid by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      This is what I hate about slashdot: the rampant agism. Everyone thinks that a computer user who's between the ages of 12 and 15 is automatically a script kiddie. That is just completely false. I don't know the first thing about being a script kiddie, only about programming and teaching people to program (when it comes to computers, that is). This is really annoying how everyone prejudices people like me (I'm 14) to be arrogant, stupid crackers.

      Well, look at it this way: When someone describes someone else as a "14 year old skript kiddie", they're actually impugning all 14 year olds, but rather "skript kiddies" who act like the worst examples of 14 year olds. Just as saying "he screamed like a two year old all day" doesn't really mean to indict the behavior of all two year olds, just the screaming kind. Also, it's more of a "mental maturity" sort of insult. The 13-14 year span is about the time when the average slob becomes aware of adult culture, but is still fairly firmly rooted mentally in the child culture. Subsequently, you see a lot of "hybrid" expressions, such as ill-informed sex talk using words from the "poopoo and weenie" lexicon. Many people, such as yourself perhaps, make the transition much earlier than 13-14. The real insult of calling some 20 or 30 year old dork on IRC "14 years old" is the implication that they never made the transition into adulthood.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    53. Re:God forbid by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Better an unwieldy group and a killfile than a group with more spam than content.

      I'm still sad about the decline of alt.sex.bestiality.hamsters.duct-tape.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    54. Re:God forbid by lonesome+phreak · · Score: 1

      that would be called a "driving test", usually one part written and one part road-based. The real problem is with people getting older and just being able to "renew" the license w/o addition training or testing.

      --
      Maybe we DID take the blue pill. You wouldn't remember anyway.
    55. Re:God forbid by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      No, that wasn't his logic at all. He said "making good decisions", not having a high IQ or being good at logic puzzles.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    56. Re:God forbid by void* · · Score: 1

      I can't believe the stupidity displayed therein..

      "n fact, an internal memo informed DiCamillo, Giannantonio and Brandt that QUIKVUE was up and running and told them how to log on to check it out."

      Holy Crap! A memo! Saying the app was up! That's so CRIMINAL!

      --


      Code or be coded.
    57. Re:God forbid by hajihill · · Score: 1
      I really must agree that this trash is not only trash, but is very, very poorly written trash...

      One would think they would clearly label quotes and provide facts to back up statements, but this is clearly the type of article designed simply to preach to the choir; designed not to inform or to educate, but simply to rouse pre-existing passions and fears directed at misunderstood technologies....

      To hell with 'em, let the luddites rot in their backwoods Alabama suburb... They can come to us when they need tech support on their hooks, buttons, and water-wheels... ;^)

      --
      Of blankness, I know nothing.
    58. Re:God forbid by mlrtime · · Score: 1


      haha that should be on bash.org... just in an irc channel with me quick so I can post it :)

    59. Re:God forbid by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Or it could mean people who pay for access to servers, which most many an alt.binaries.* devotee is known to do.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    60. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just how are they supposed to know that until after they take it and go over the hard drive???

    61. Re:God forbid by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      yeah, good point!

      --
      Sig out of date
    62. Re:God forbid by ovit · · Score: 0

      Go to the bookstore and look for a book called "Masters of Doom"... This exact thing happens a lot...

      Tony

    63. Re:God forbid by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      Now that you've found it, would you be so kind to post a .torrent? This would be a nice one for my "strange stuff" folder (and that of many readers here, I suppose).

      BTW and completely off-topic, if you don't have a "strange stuff" folder, I suggest you try and save some of that wierd stuff you stumble upon. I like to concentrate on images, YMMV. Look at it in a few years. My stuff from the mid-nineties is a priceless laugh. Impresses chicks, too. (I thought I'd mention it, this is /. after all.)

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
    64. Re:God forbid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's because our age group is embarrassed by the fact that most of those arrogants assholes are in their 20s or 30s, and the reason they're so arrogant is because they've become fixed on a specific mindset and are so certain of their righteousness there's no reasoning with them.

      Maybe it's because some us ancient 30 year olds were in your position 15 years ago and we regret it now.

    65. Re:God forbid by InterventionOne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article wasn't aimed at you. It was aimed at the general public. It was fairly balanced and described the good, the bad, and the ugly of IRC.

      This is a good point, but I'll debate the "fairly balanced" for two reasons:

      (1), as you sort of pointed out, it's much easier to get caught up in the "bad" than it is to notice the "good" in this article.

      (2), couple #1 with the fact that "the general public" tend to be paranoid when it comes to computer stuff that they don't know diddly squat about, and suddenly this article is yet another case of FUDSI.

    66. Re:God forbid by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      you'd be getting confused over wisdom, intelligence and maturity -- realted but distinct qualities. I've met many stupid wise people. Being stupid in fact helps bring wisdom. Being smart helps bring arrogance.

    67. Re:God forbid by saroth2 · · Score: 1

      Grandparent is also off by an order of magnitude 500,000 not 50,000 people on IRC

    68. Re:God forbid by tombeard · · Score: 1

      STFU!!!

      He didn't mean anything, just an anonomous nutcase. No such thing around here.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    69. Re:God forbid by waveclaw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Police, FBI and other law enforcement agencies seize computer equipment *all the time*.
      [snip]
      The police who arrive at the office/your house/whatever know what computers look like, and might have one 'expert' with them, but they will never just take copies of your data, they will take whole machines, even whole networks.


      Hmmmm...

      If a computer has had kiddy porn on it, they typically destroy the computer.

      So, the key is to get a bunch of old, empty 486 boxen for a font job and build your cases out of non-computer like stuff. Funiture. Lamps. Microwaves.

      Cops come in a size everything 'computer like' while you hide the power cord running into your wi-fi enabled lay-z-boy.

      I guess Extreme Case modding can pay off.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    70. Re:God forbid by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      I could from zero when I do push-ups... Oh, crap, Real Programmers don't do push-ups. Fuck it. Foiled again.:)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    71. Re:God forbid by taernim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah. Those crazy teens and their hacking of that Gibson... Poor, poor Balky.... ;)

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    72. Re:God forbid by yosemite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I actually appreciate that 14 year olds, or any age, can get on the net. I was exposed to an amazing array of information near that age that I might not have had access to if I hadn't started to explore the net.

      I would really have to say that worrying about "agism" on slashdot is a waste of your time. The net, at least to me, is the domain of geeky teenagers, maybe you dont know it yet. That might be because of non-tech savvy older generation can't compete, but in any event the net provides for most kids a greater degree of autonomy then is possible in their everyday lives. So in that sense I think teenagers should be given more leeway then adults, they deserve it. You know-youth culture *always* supercedes the older generations.

      Let the kids roam, its good for the ecosystem. In fact, script kiddies are good for the ecosystem too as well as people who program and teach people to program. Hellz, there's plenty of room for all.

    73. Re:God forbid by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

      I would love to see the following ...

      A news-based web site "investigates" WPVI. On discovering that they don't broadcast all the stories they receive in a given day, but only some of them, they manufacture a story about the evils of unsupervised censorship happening every day in the privately-owned broadcast media, and nothing being done about it by the police. Then the web site speculates about the hidden agendas of the editors in the media, and why they hide all these stories.

      Then a selection of the culled stories is shown, all featuring children and the elderly.

      Why weren't we told about these stories? Oh the horrors! Please think of the children and elderly!

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    74. Re:God forbid by Netsnipe · · Score: 1

      You better believe how dangerous IRC "help" channels are. There are these "elite" people who set your computer on fire over the interweb if you piss them off by asking questions that are too simple for them. They use some special hacking program called "flaming" or something like that.

      --
      -- "I can't tell the future, I just work there." -- The Doctor
    75. Re:God forbid by Torne · · Score: 1

      So, the key is to get a bunch of old, empty 486 boxen for a font job and build your cases out of non-computer like stuff. Funiture. Lamps. Microwaves.

      Cops come in a size everything 'computer like' while you hide the power cord running into your wi-fi enabled lay-z-boy.


      That could work pretty well. =)

    76. Re:God forbid by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Psst. I'm 31. That would make you 46.

  2. Such a discovery! by Jaywalk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. The New York Times has discovered IRC. What an amazing discovery. What are they going to discover next? Pennsylvania? I'd love to hear their hard-hitting expose about Pittsburgh.

    --
    ===== Murphy's Law is recursive. =====
    1. Re:Such a discovery! by beh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's kind of interesting that the NYT would engage in what I would
      consider sensationalist press. I remember that in the late 1990s a
      German TV report came out with a sensationalist article about the
      fact that there was a "secret document" on the Internet which would
      describe how to build bombs - and that this would be totally
      scandalous.

      This "*secret* document" was the FAQ rec.pyrotechnics...

    2. Re:Such a discovery! by robnauta · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are probably surprised that people still use it, despite its lackluster color support hacks (mirc-specific), old protocols that refuses to change (allowing wonderful things to enhance your chat experience like floods, nickfloods, people intentionally splitting the network to gain 'ops', an unusable channel list, and a screen full of mode changes), and slow nat-unfriendly filetransfers.

    3. Re:Such a discovery! by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Wow. The New York Times has discovered IRC. What an amazing discovery. What are they going to discover next? Pennsylvania? I'd love to hear their hard-hitting expose about Pittsburgh."

      Wait'll they discover that IRC is twelve years old! I think that the protocol is older than most of the people that use it, at least on a mental level.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re:Such a discovery! by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, in the mid-90's there was a lot of hype (not sure if in the media) about a document that described how to build atomic bombs.

      Of course, that document started saying something like "go to your local grocery store and buy 3 kg of U-235" :)

    5. Re:Such a discovery! by madprof · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well the article says it began in the late 80s so maybe someone told them....?

    6. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. I had a video file (recently lost due to drive crash) of a really horrible bit of sensationalist journalism.

      "Evil hackers in shady chatrooms in the corners of the internet." word for word from the program.

      It was a rip of a film about the evils of ripping films. I loved it.

      Oh well.

    7. Re:Such a discovery! by amembleton · · Score: 2, Informative
      despite its lackluster color support hacks (mirc-specific)

      Those colour support hacks also work in Chatzilla, part of Mozilla.

    8. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Of course, that document started saying something like "go to your local grocery store and buy 3 kg of U-235" :)

      Then use an old buick as a shell. Carefully pack the entire contraption in a few tons of traditional explosives like plastique or nitroglycerin....

      The really amusing part is that it isn't all that hard to build an atomic bomb. Only two ingredients are difficult to come by:

      1. Enriched U-235 or Pu-239. The enrichment process requires a massive chemicals and refining infrastructure. Pu-239 is produced inside worked reactors and is carefully accounted for by UN watchdogs. Plus the Pu-239 has to be very pure. If it contains a large amount of Pu-238, it will be useless.

      2. The initial charge has to be carefully shaped or else the bomb will fizzle. The only known ways to test a design are by actually blowing one up or running computer simulations. The former is rather noticeable, while the later is the reason we put an embargo on computing technology to certain countries.

      If you want to know how to build a hydrogen bomb, go do a search for the Progressive article. Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector!

    9. Re:Such a discovery! by zolon · · Score: 5, Informative
      It is actually older then 12 years. 1989 was when Eris Free Network was started in hopes of getting rid of eris.edu.

      I think I just have proven that I am either old, or a geek. Probably both.

      sin

      --
      Merf
    10. Re:Such a discovery! by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can picture it: They'd have an article on how Pittsburgh is the hiding place of Bin Laden, and an international stash of nuclear weapons.

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    11. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next they'll try to patent it, but will fail. Too bad it isn't a plant.

    12. Re:Such a discovery! by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Pittsburgh is well known to NYT, most editors vacation in Mars, or Moon (slightly north of Pitt's)..

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    13. Re:Such a discovery! by isopossu · · Score: 2, Funny
      Did you know IRC is of Finnish origin? As is linux.

      Ban the commie-cracker-pornloving Finland!

    14. Re:Such a discovery! by dougmc · · Score: 3, Informative
      It is actually older then 12 years. 1989 was when Eris Free Network was started in hopes of getting rid of eris.edu.
      The first IRC server was created in 1988. The Anet/Eris-Free net split actually happened in 1990. This page may be useful.
    15. Re:Such a discovery! by deeblite · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that you posted this on Slashdot at all proves that you're a geek.

    16. Re:Such a discovery! by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The former is rather noticeable, while the later is the reason we put an embargo on computing technology to certain countries.

      Even worse, you need accurate data on previous explosions for valid simulations. The French ran a whole new series of tests to get it. Stealing the data from one of the existing nuclear powers should be as difficult as simply stealing a working nuke.

      On the other hand if you've got enough plutonium/u-235 it is possible to build a bomb which should be working even with slight deviations from the optimum

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    17. Re:Such a discovery! by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      What are they going to discover next? Pennsylvania? I'd love to hear their hard-hitting expose about Pittsburgh.

      It's really not as exciting as it sounds ;). A few rivers, some bridges and accursed tunnels, and lots of cars. =)

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    18. Re:Such a discovery! by sparkie · · Score: 4, Informative

      IRC was born during summer 1988 when Jarkko "WiZ" Oikarinen wrote the first IRC client and server at the University of Oulu, Finland (where he was working at the Department of Information Processing Science).

      Making it 16 years old.

      http://daniel.haxx.se/irchistory.html

    19. Re:Such a discovery! by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2
      and in X-chat and irssi and countless others- even Java applets. Too many others, in fact. WILL SOMEONE PLEASE SET CHANNEL MODE +c?

      Much better. I like my color filter. :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    20. Re:Such a discovery! by EodLabs · · Score: 1

      Being from Pittsburgh I'd like you to know we are lobbying to ban DCC transfers... We hope this will stop our ever growing Pittsburgh_Animal_pr0n problem.

    21. Re:Such a discovery! by gkwok · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about Pu-36? Oh goody! My illudium Pu-36 explosive space modulator!

    22. Re:Such a discovery! by PReDiToR · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well the article says

      Oh there's always one, isn't there? You had to show off that you Read TFA.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    23. Re:Such a discovery! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      yeah how, two rivers merge into ONE river.

    24. Re:Such a discovery! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Probably MUDs. "Like IRC, only not."

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    25. Re:Such a discovery! by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I rememeber getting a "Secret picture of a Atomic Bomb schematic" years ago. I may still have it. Its ok though. To preserve national security it is in a format almost impossible to decrypt: Apple Newton Book format.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    26. Re:Such a discovery! by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's kind of interesting that the NYT would engage in what I would consider sensationalist press.

      Right. That's /.'s job....

      From the article:
      Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time, and many of them are engaged in legitimate activities, network administrators say.
      The /. take?
      And if you're on IRC, remember, you're evil.
      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    27. Re:Such a discovery! by galaxy300 · · Score: 1

      Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector!

      I've heard that you can do it with a couple of salad bowls.

    28. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But whatever shall you do without the color ascii cocks?

    29. Re:Such a discovery! by Turmio · · Score: 3, Informative

      IRC is actually even older than that and it was invented by a fellow called Jarkko Oikarinen in University of Oulu in Finland in August 1988. Read about it here. First servers that formed the the original IRC network are still online participating the IRCnet network.

    30. Re:Such a discovery! by Turmio · · Score: 1

      Umm, IRCnet website is actually located at http://www.ircnet.net.

    31. Re:Such a discovery! by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector

      I thought that was a boy scout badge. (I know, I know - still a fun read)

    32. Re:Such a discovery! by funny-jack · · Score: 1

      1. Enriched U-235 or Pu-239.

      Plutonium? No problem. Just look up the Lybians...

      --
      You probably shouldn't click this.
    33. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector!
      Just use depleted urainium. It's available to the average joe. =)

    34. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that this is a Marvin the Martian reference, wouldn't FUNNY have been a more appropriate moderation?

    35. Re:Such a discovery! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector!

      U-238 tamper/reflector in the center and for the outside Buy Beryllium Here!
      Of course, wrapping your implosion target in foil probably doesn't count as "manufacturing" and probably won't work...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    36. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Plutonium? No problem. Just look up the Lybians...

      Amazing how Doc Brown built such a tiny thermal reactor. And even managed to get a few Gigajoules of energy within seconds! That invention alone must have made him rich beyond belief!

    37. Re:Such a discovery! by windows · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, troll, I'll bite.

      There are two types of text formatting that are used on IRC. One uses ANSI escapes (nowadays these are rarely seen) and the other uses the mIRC style of color. Nearly every IRC client I've seen supports mIRC color codes, including BitchX, irssi, xircon, epic, ircii, and just about any other client made in the last 5 years or so.

      The protocols have changed over time, and as such, several RFCs have been released as updates to the original RFC1459. In addition, many networks add their own nonstandard features and hacks to further improve their users experience. These new RFCs were released in 2000, IIRC.

      Floods are rare and are rather difficult to do well nowadays. Most channels are protected with bots of some sort and most of these bots automatically prevent floods and nickfloods. In addition, these bots enforce bans, automatically kicking a banned user from the channel. While it's not directly part of the IRC protocol, bots and enhancements in client software have eliminated most of these problems. The same goes for a screen full of mode changes. I use irssi, which will condense mode changes into less lines so your screen isn't full of flooding.

      Splitting any major network to get ops in a channel is virtually impossible now. For the most part, that issue was solved in 1996 when TS (on EFnet) and delay (on IRCNet) were implemented. At least on the EFnet side of things, this has been enhanced to TS3, TS5, and then a CHANFIX bot was added. Now on EFnet, even a channel which has been taken over can be fixed. Packeting servers to gain ops is useless and just doesn't happen anymore. So, unless you've been away from IRC for about the past eight years, you would know this isn't a problem.

      As for the nat-unfriendly transfers, that's another myth. In mIRC, there's an option of how to obtain your IP. One method is "normal" and the other is "server." If you're behind a NAT, just select server. Instead of looking up your IP the normal way, it gets your IP from the server and as a result will get the IP of your gateway, thus allowing DCC to work correctly. You might have to forward a few ports if you want to DCC send, but that shouldn't be a huge issue. Nearly every other IRC client has a similar feature to get your IP from the server. I'm behind a NAT and have no trouble with DCC.

      While all of your complaints were true at one time in the past, IRC has improved greatly in recent years. Just about every issue you mention has been addressed.

    38. Re:Such a discovery! by nolife · · Score: 1

      Good luck on manufacturing a uranium neutron reflector!

      What makes a uranium neutron different from any other neutron?

      Hydrogen Hydroxide aka Dihydrogen Monoxide reflects neutrons pretty well. The mass of a Hydrogen atom and the fleeing neutron are similar so a good energy transfer takes place. Of course the dangers of Hydrogen Hydroxide are still being studied. ;)

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    39. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      What makes a uranium neutron different from any other neutron?

      You're not funny.

      Hydrogen Hydroxide aka Dihydrogen Monoxide reflects neutrons pretty well.

      Actually, it absorbs neutron. You're still not funny.

      Of course the dangers of Hydrogen Hydroxide are still being studied.

      Groan...

      Sorry bub, keep trying.

    40. Re:Such a discovery! by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      From ircnet.org: There is some confusion about which the "Official IRCnet page" is. The answer is simple, there isn't one. To have an official page would imply that one group of people were in control of IRCnet and this isn't the case so in reflection of this there are a few pages out there that represent IRCnet. IRCnet.org (this page) is maintained by the original IRC operators and is aimed more towards linking up various user pages in a simple and easy to use way, whereas IRCnet.com is shiny and corporate looking and concentrates more on the actual network.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    41. Re:Such a discovery! by Lacutis · · Score: 1

      Umm, he didn't invent Mr. Fusion, he had it installed when he went to the future.

    42. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I was referring to the Fission reactor he had on the Delorean *before* he installed Mr. Fusion. Converting that much thermal energy into electricity tends to require equipment much larger than that seen on the back of the car. Not to mention the amount of shielding that was suspiciously missing...

    43. Re:Such a discovery! by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's always the Finns who program the cool stuff :P

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    44. Re:Such a discovery! by nolife · · Score: 1

      Actually, it absorbs neutron.

      Water does absorb neutrons but the primary use is to slow down escaping neutrons to the thermal energy level and reflect them back to the uranium source so they can be absorbed by more uranium to sustain the reaction. Water is very good for this because of the almost equivelnt mass between the hydrogen in the water and the neutron and it reduces the amount of collisions required to get it to slow down which reduces the chance of the neutron being absorbed by something else or escaping. If one mass was relatively larger then the other, the neutron would not be slowed down enough on each collision. If water was "that good" at absorbing neutrons and scatter and slowing did not occur, it would be much harder to sustain a reaction. Using heavy water or enriched U235 would help offset that though.

      Particle scattering kinematics is not high on my list anymore, nuclear power is probably much different then good bomb design so take my comments with a grain of salt.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    45. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... while the later is the reason we put an
      > embargo on computing technology to certain
      > countries...

      Open Source software excepted, of course.

    46. Re:Such a discovery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckin' geeks.

    47. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Water does absorb neutrons but the primary use is to slow down escaping neutrons to the thermal energy level and reflect them back to the uranium source so they can be absorbed by more uranium to sustain the reaction.

      But for an H-Bomb, you're primary purpose is to reflect as much force toward the center as possible. Uranium is so strong that it will allow enough pressure to build up for Hydrogen Fusion to occur. (The Hydrogen/Tritum is suspended in the center of the shell.) In that situation, water would act more like a neutron absorber instead of a reflector.

      Your problem is that you're trying to build a fission reactor instead of a fusion bomb. In a fusion bomb, the fission event is merely a trigger. There's no need (and in fact it would be detrimental) to attempt to sustain a super-critical reaction.

    48. Re:Such a discovery! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Open Source software excepted, of course.

      Software has little to nothing to do with it. The embargoes are on the hardware necessary to do the dirty work. Software embargoes are primary for reasons of security. i.e. Make sure that your opponent is less organized than you are. Encryption software is about the only software (that I'm aware of) that actually gets classified as a weapon.

    49. Re:Such a discovery! by bmw · · Score: 1

      In addition, many networks add their own nonstandard features and hacks to further improve their users experience.

      I'm not sure "improve" is always the correct word here... Some networks out there just seem to love implementing similar features but in completely different ways thus causing client authors immense headaches and, consequently, causing the user's experience to suffer as well due to their "broken" client. *ugh*

    50. Re:Such a discovery! by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      *Knock* Hello Mr. Batman, I'd like to speak with you. Come with me.

    51. Re:Such a discovery! by madprof · · Score: 1

      It's cheating, I know...

  3. How many years has IRC been running? by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next thing you know, they'll be raving about the wonders of Archie, Veronica and Gopher!

    1. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Archie, Veronica and Gopher. Once again, it's Jughead, man!
      Jughead I say!

    2. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was there ever an Internet app called Big Ethel?

    3. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke went over your head man.

    4. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best I can Do.

    5. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Sadly, IE no longer supports gopher:// addresses.

    6. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by jandrese · · Score: 4, Funny

      What? Without Gopher where am I supposed to find copies of wuftp for Windows 3.1 and news on the 1995 Nobel Prize winners?

      Actually, Gopher is great for looking back at what the internet looked like 8 years ago, when the last update was made to a Gopher site.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 3, Informative

      You forgot WAIS. You know veronica was only a fancy front end for gopher right?

      I do miss gopher though. I was on the internet for about 8 months before the WWW hit. Those were good days.

      Remember nemesis.berkey.edu/~gdead to download all the .au shows? Anyone?

    8. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's still Veronica for me.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can have both! NOT WORK-SAFE!

    10. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Willie_the_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Some personal gopher history. When I was in college, I discovered the "..." directories, hidden on various sites. Inside the ... dir were usually .bin, .req, etc. dirs. The source of all warez for in those days.

      I also used to troll ftp.uu.net's /tmp directory daily. It was purged frequently, but you *never* knew what would show up there.

      I think that is what got me hooked on the net back then (1988,89); the constant new material, unmolested by today's commercialism. Fun Stuff / Good memories

      Todd

    11. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by Tantrum420 · · Score: 1

      From the looks of that picture, I'd say it's more like Michael Jackson for you. ;-D

      I've always been more of a Betty guy, myself.

      T

    12. Re:How many years has IRC been running? by rastos1 · · Score: 1
      I do miss gopher though. I was on the internet for about 8 months before the WWW hit. Those were good days.

      Me too. For sure the reason is that it was about providing content.

  4. Shhhhhh by ryanw · · Score: 0, Redundant

    We better not tell them about Usenet, he might have a heart attack.

  5. why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about posting the link advert free next time then, heheheh

    2. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooh, nice idea, i'll do that next time... ;)

    3. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Actually, you do quite a lot around here, Mr. Coward!
      At least you didn't post a Tubgirl troll this time...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:why is it always me that does this? by oordaz · · Score: 1, Funny

      you got this link in a IRC channel. . . right?

    5. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find the reg free links?

    6. Re:why is it always me that does this? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      How exactly do you make a regfree link?

    7. Re:why is it always me that does this? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Nevermind... Should have googled first:

    8. Re:why is it always me that does this? by xiopher · · Score: 0

      why you find it here
      ps
      good idea about the print only page.

    9. Re:why is it always me that does this? by nutshell42 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Even as much of the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb

      oh yeah (beware, goatse ahead =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    10. Re:why is it always me that does this? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Crap, I wanted to mod parent funny but it was already at the max.

    11. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how. A method description here would be useful

    12. Re:why is it always me that does this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only advert-free, but also without their pretty little diagram on relays.

      Silly Anonymous Coward!

  6. Thanks for the heads up... by jejones · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess I need to work on a maniacal laugh or on holding my extended pinkie to the corner of my mouth. And there I thought I was just getting help with Gentoo and Fedora Core 2 Test 3...

    1. Re:Thanks for the heads up... by prat393 · · Score: 3, Funny
      And there I thought I was just getting help with Gentoo and Fedora Core 2 Test 3...
      You're mixing them? Diabolical!
  7. I.R.C.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why does Dalnet get listed before EFnet? What's up with that?

    1. Re:I.R.C.? by dleifelohcs · · Score: 1, Informative

      A B C D E F G H I J... Newspapers list everything alphabetically where applicable.

    2. Re:I.R.C.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Dalnet should always be listed after EFnet, or better yet, not listed at all.

  8. Thank god... by Lugor · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..they haven't found bash.org yet!

    1. Re:Thank god... by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      it's all over once that happens.

      okay, everyone go home. the intarweb is ruined.

    2. Re:Thank god... by ezzewezza · · Score: 1
  9. Well policed suburbs? by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, they're refering to usenet. I mean, I haven't seen a fatal shooting there in quite some time.

    1. Re:Well policed suburbs? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      There have been, but it was encoded with eYnc and you filtered out all posts with the word eYnc in the subject.

    2. Re:Well policed suburbs? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Obviously, they're refering to usenet. I mean, I haven't seen a fatal shooting there in quite some time.

      Not on irc, the place of eeeeeeeeeevil either. But not for lack of motive

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Well policed suburbs? by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      The Derek Smart, Ph.D flamewar keeps Usenet warm at night. It's about the closest thing to a steady stream of drive-bys you will find, with constant threats and counter-threats of legal action.

    4. Re:Well policed suburbs? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh. But what about the *non* fatal shootings?

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  10. Well, of course it's wild. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    Hell, even TRON GUY hangs out on IRC. But I'm not telling you where.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Well, of course it's wild. by Mdalek · · Score: 3, Funny


      errm....because we're all dying to know.

    2. Re:Well, of course it's wild. by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      He hangs out all over the place...

  11. Of course by Orgazmus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is not every place with free speech and relative stealthness a breedingplace for:
    -terrorists
    -virusmakers
    -worms
    -terroris ts
    -porn
    -terrorists

    ?

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    1. Re:Of course by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This century, it's the Internet. 200 (or so) years ago, it was coffeehouses. No matter what the forum, it will always be used to discuss dissention.

    2. Re:Of course by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      If by "breedingplace" you mean "fosters", then sure. When people are oppressed in one form or another, they seek more covert means of communication. It's not the mere fact that it's a form of communication, but that it becomes the only form for that particular tract of conversation. You're going to find very few discussions of writing the next Blaster worm in a Sunday school.

    3. Re:Of course by Dhalka226 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not entirely applicable, but your comment reminded me of a quote:

      "The only freedom which counts is the freedom to do what some other people think to be wrong. There is no point in demanding freedom to do that which all will applaud. All the so-called liberties or rights are things which have to be asserted against others who claim that if such things are to be allowed their own rights are infringed or their own liberties threatened. This is always true, even when we speak of the freedom to worship, of the right of free speech or association, or of public assembly. If we are to allow freedoms at all there will constantly be complaints that either the liberty itself or the way in which it is exercised is being abused, and, if it is a genuine freedom, these complaints will often be justified. There is no way of having a free society in which there is not abuse. Abuse is the very hallmark of liberty."
      -- Lord Chief Justice Halisham

    4. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      havent you heard?
      free stuff is against the constitution :)

    5. Re:Of course by isorox · · Score: 1

      This century, it's the Internet. 200 (or so) years ago, it was coffeehouses.

      So in 2204 we'll be watching the final episode of a program where 6 average new-new-yorkers are gathered on an IRC channel with 50 million people watching?

    6. Re:Of course by Threni · · Score: 1

      > So in 2204 we'll be watching the final episode of a program where 6 average
      > new-new-yorkers are gathered on an IRC channel with 50 million people watching?

      I hope not. If there's any justice then, then those sorts of people will have been tracked down and killed before the end of episode 2.

  12. Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this best sums up what is at play here:

    "The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear. And the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown." -- Lovecraft.

    IRC is still more difficult to use than AOL chat rooms and largely the domain of techies. Sure bad stuff happens there because it's not part of the mainstream, but I don't know that it's worse there than anywhere else... ...god help them if they find USENET.

    Cheers!
    SCB

    1. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      god help them if they find USENET.

      OMFG der is pr0n on Usenet!!! OFMMFG!!! LOLOOLOL.

    2. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking kidding me. Harder than AOL?!?!?! My 12 year old cousin uses IRC.

    3. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DER PRON ist in DER USENET

    4. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes and when I was that I age I was teaching my computer teachers how to use computers, but that doesn't mean a damn thing. 1) the young often times more easily adapt to complicated technologies than older people, 2) a twelve year old often times doesn't have much better to do than fuck with an IRC client, 3) -Most- 12 year olds don't use IRC because there are more readily available methods (like AOL and IM).

      Much of the point is that IRC takes more to get logged in, it takes more to find the client, it takes more to find an IRC server. Finally, you have to go looking for IRC whereas AOL and IM clients are thrust in your face.

    5. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by prat393 · · Score: 1

      The scary part has always been finding out that it's not mainstream: you're going to middle school, working on some neat eggdrop mods, and realize that even though all of your friends use it, nobody else does... so you become a bitter comp. sci. major and start reading /. to cope.

    6. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by scseth · · Score: 1


      Hello? Have you installed MIRC lately? IRC is not at all hard to connect to and use.

    7. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to tell that to my mother.

    8. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by dustmite · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine actually met his current wife (across continents) via irc. The relationship was mostly irc for months, eventually he moved, they got married, and they now have a child too, last I checked they were still happy together. How evil is that ... not.

    9. Re:Ahhh.. fear of the unknown by steve+buttgereit · · Score: 1

      Sure and after trying to connect to 3 servers that wouldn't let me... I remembered this was the 21st century and let it go.

  13. Description by Digital+G · · Score: 0, Troll

    IRC = IM's Big Brother

    --

    End Transmission....
  14. hah. by mrtroy · · Score: 1

    EYE R SEE why IRC is so bad now.

    They(we) invented l33tsp34k :P

    now they r bad.

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    1. Re:hah. by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      I saw "l33t"speak on BBSes long before the internet was generally available, sadly. I'd say a lot of it sprung up from the warez movement in general.

  15. Darn! Now average joe will use it and ruin it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Time to go back to BBS for all the evil stuff.

  16. /list by Himring · · Score: 5, Funny

    IRC is the breeding ground of all the Internet's Evils

    It was in 1996 that I developed my eye twitch. That was just after having read /list for the first time on efnet....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:/list by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Informative
      IRC developed a successive series of safety features to prevent this from happening. First, they designed the network to drop you for flooding when you did a /list *, and later, they just prevented it entirely - at least on efnet. (The one true irc network.)

      I haven't tried doing one on openprojects or anything like that, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:/list by Torne · · Score: 1

      Most modern ircds have a feature called SAFELIST, which means it's safe to ask for a /list that returns any number of the results, and the server will send it to you in small chunks that will not overflow the buffer. =)

    3. Re:/list by Chutzpah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's pretty interesting, especially considering I did a /list on EFnet about 20 minutes ago. I got 24366 channels and didn't get disconnected while it was listing (although xchat locked up for a bit, probably while it was sorting the list).

    4. Re:/list by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Openprojects is now freenode.net and yes, it does support the /list command.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    5. Re:/list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > efnet (The one true irc network.)

      Use ircnet, accept no cheap substitutes! You might want to check the origins of irc. And check "finn" from the jargon-file...

    6. Re:/list by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Some servers will still allow a /list, it's actually a server and not a network parameter. However most servers have disabled list because of the sudden surge in bandwidth associated with its use.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. seems odd by theMerovingian · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I think its funny that file sharing is now on a par with animal pornography...

    The vilification plan is almost complete.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:seems odd by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Funny

      That depends. We talking animals with other animals, or animals with people? The former you can find on the Discovery Channel; the latter, not so much.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:seems odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the truly evil - sharing animal pornography!

    3. Re:seems odd by rbolkey · · Score: 1

      ... animal pornography ...

      Zoos are the plauge. To think they're government funded, full of naked animals, and they even allow, no, encourage kids to patronize them. Shoot, I know people that let their pets walk around the house naked all the time, but I guess that's in the privacy of their homes, so it would be alright.

    4. Re:seems odd by Zareste · · Score: 1

      Ah, it's not nearly as bad as a deadbeat halfwit journalist screaming for attention by saying 'Look! Evil! This is a freedom so it's evil! Somebody pay attention to me! ...Anyone?'

      --
      I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
    5. Re:seems odd by prat393 · · Score: 1

      Really? Then what channel was that on?!?!

    6. Re:seems odd by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Whoah, wait 'til they find out I'm sharing copyrighted photos of 14-year-old, one-eyed, peg-legged pooches getting it on.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    7. Re:seems odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah you saw the humanzee special. "oliver" is a special monkey, when he was 16, he tried to mount his handlers wife, by bending her over the table and going doggie style on her. he walks (all the time) on two feet, shoulders back, and likes cuban cigars. he has taste...

      heh funny shit,
      the part of the congo where he came from people and monkey live real close together (often they are pets), a little too close together. they are thinking someone enjoyed the loving of a monkey a little too much..

    8. Re:seems odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On another note, sex with animals is perfectly legal here in Sweden.

    9. Re:seems odd by identity0 · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the Valentine's day special with Steve Erwin and an Anaconda.

      Someone needs to get that man a date. On second thought, he'd probobly provide annoying running commentary on his date's looks and behavior while stalking them, followed by a wrestling match in the mud. Someone needs to set him up with Darl McBride : )

  18. Quitcherbitchin'... here's the text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was just another Wednesday on the sprawling Internet chat-room network known as I.R.C. In a room called Prime-Tyme-Movies, users offered free pirated downloads of "The Passion of the Christ'' and "Kill Bill Vol. 2.'' In the DDO-Matrix channel, illegal copies of Microsoft's Windows software and "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time,'' an Xbox game, were ripe for downloading. In other chat rooms yesterday, whole albums of free MP3's were hawked with blaring capital letters. And in a far less obtrusive channel, a hacker may well have been checking his progress of hacking into the computers of unsuspecting Internet users.

    Even as much of the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb, a little-known neighborhood known as Internet Relay Chat remains the Wild West. While copyright holders and law enforcement agencies take aim at their adversaries on Web sites and peer-to-peer file-sharing networks like Napster, I.R.C. remains the place where people with something to hide go to do business.

    Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time, and many of them are engaged in legitimate activities, network administrators say. Yet that pirated copy of Microsoft Office or Norton Utilities that turns up on a home-burned CD-ROM may well have originated on I.R.C. And the Internet viruses and "denial of service'' attacks that periodically make news generally get their start there, too. This week, the network's chat rooms were abuzz with what seemed like informed chatter about the Sasser worm, which infected hundreds of thousands of computers over the weekend.

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that fights software piracy. "If they were only associating with each other and inbreeding, maybe we could coexist alongside them. But it doesn't work that way. What they're doing on I.R.C. has a way of permeating into mainstream piracy.''

    Two weeks ago, the F.B.I., in conjunction with law enforcement agencies in 10 foreign countries, announced an operation called Fastlink, aimed at shutting down the activities of almost 100 people suspected of helping operate illegal software vaults on the Internet. The pirated copies of music, films, games and other software were generally distributed using a separate Internet file-transfer system, said a Justice Department spokesman, but the actual pirates generally used I.R.C. to communicate and coordinate with one another.

    "The groups targeted as part of Fastlink are alleged to have used I.R.C. to have committed their crimes, like almost all other warez groups,'' the spokesman, Michael Kulstad, said in a telephone interview. Warez, pronounced like wares, is techie slang for illegally copied software.

    When I.R.C. started in the 1980's, it was best known as a way for serious computer professionals worldwide to communicate in real time. It is still possible - though sometimes a bit difficult - to find mature technical discussions among the tens of thousands of I.R.C. chat rooms, known as channels, operating at any one time. There are also respectable I.R.C. systems and channels - some operated by universities or Internet service providers - for gamers seeking opponents or those who want to talk about sports or hobbies.

    Still, I.R.C. perhaps most closely resembles the cantina scene in "Star Wars'': a louche hangout of digital smugglers, pirates, curiosity seekers and the people who love them (or hunt them). There seem to be I.R.C. channels dedicated to every sexual fetish, and I.R.C. users speculate that terrorists also use the networks to communicate in relative obscurity. Yet I.R.C. has its advocates, who point to its legitimate uses.

    "I.R.C. is where all of the kids come on and go nuts,'' William A. Bierman, a college student in Hawaii who helps develop I.R.C. server software and who is known online as billy-jon, said in a telephone interview. "All of the attention I.R.C. has

    1. Re:Quitcherbitchin'... here's the text. by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but nobody is bitching, except you apparently!

  19. If they think IRC is bad by Tebriel · · Score: 5, Funny

    they should see Ebay. There's some weird shit for sale there....

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
    1. Re:If they think IRC is bad by Laur · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
  20. IRC isn't the cause... by lxt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article implies IRC is the cause of the evils. IRC is a medium, not a cause. It's just a way of organising so called "evils". You still have to want to get to the "evil" material in the first place.

    1. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by mrtroy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe the article proves you are incorrect. IRC is not just a medium, apparently.
      Yet that pirated copy of Microsoft Office or Norton Utilities that turns up on a home-burned CD-ROM may well have originated on I.R.C.
      Pirated software can originate from IRC itself (not the clients or the servers)
      The whole idea behind I.R.C. is freedom of speech. There is really no structure on the Internet for policing I.R.C., and there are intentionally no rules. Obviously you're not allowed to hack the Pentagon, but there are no rules like 'You can't say this' or 'You can't do that.'
      You can hack the pentagon from IRC, you just arent supposed to.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    2. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by frinkster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You still have to want to get to the "evil" material in the first place.

      And if there's anything the drug war has taught us, it's that as long as people want something, people will get it.

    3. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but people in New York don't understand that. That is why they ban guns whenever possible.

    4. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by prat393 · · Score: 1
      Pirated software can originate from IRC itself
      Okay, now we have a leg up against M$: apparently IRC owns the copyright to Office.
    5. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I believe the article proves you are incorrect. IRC is not just a medium, apparently
      The article doesn't prove he's incorrect. It simply proves the author's (and apparently your) ignorance. Telephones are used daily to plan & carry out crimes, yet they are merely a communications medium. IRC allows a certain degree of anonymity, but it's simply a comm medium.

      Pirated software can originate from IRC itself (not the clients or the servers)
      Do you honestly think that all you have to do is boot an IRC server & it will begin pirating software? It's the users who do that...users who could do it over the phone-"d00d, can you get me a copy of partition magic? yea? kewl!" can be done via Ma Bell, but that doesn't mean Ma Bell is pirating sw.

    6. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Surely a SIGN with 'BITING SARCASM' would have been too obvious...

      *sigh*

      --
      Delphis
    7. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I want a pony.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I want a pony.

      Ask and ye shall receive!

      If yer willing to pay for it, that is...

    9. Re:IRC isn't the cause... by GoldenWolf · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a medium that is not used for some illegal activity. IRC, HTTP, FTP, P2P, and any number of others. What's bad is not the medium itself, but the individuals that misuse the medium...and the Media Industry that gives the medium the bad reputation. Not everything that goes on P2P is illegal. And not everything that goes on in IRC is illegal, as this article would have you to believe.

      Danger: Extended usage of the Microsoft (TM) Windows (R) Operating System may cause damage to your mental health.

  21. I, for one... by thedogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new evil IRC overlords...

    But truly, you want to know something that is the epitome of evil, that represents fire and brimstone, and a general sense of Rotting.... Netsplits!

    Oh the Horror!

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
  22. In Other News... by Vaginal+Discharge · · Score: 2, Funny

    President Bush sends US Marshalls into IRC to try to bring law and order.

    --
    "Glory is fleeting but obscurity is forever" - Napoleon Bonapart.
    1. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      President Bush sends US Marshalls into IRC to try to bring law and order.

      /mode #WMD +s

    2. Re:In Other News... by perseguidor · · Score: 1

      (could also go as)

      President Bush: Get IN the computer!
      Marshall: But sir...
      Bush (draws gun): GET IN.

      --
      O make me a mask
    3. Re:In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      President Bush sends US Marshalls into IRC to try to bring law and order.

      He's late; some guy already has all the Law and Order episodes available. Maybe he could give us some Criminal Intent.

  23. Hmm... by Peden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While the submitter might be right in hinting that the New York Times, does not know jack about the internet, they do have a point. IRC _IS_ the breeding ground for all sorts of weird stuff, be that legal or illegal, and although many people use it for strictly legal purposes, it could do with some cleanup. The question remains though, should IRC be censored along with everything else (little by little, our precious internet is going mainstream), or should it remain as it is? Personally I am for the staying of IRC, yet I also share the concerns of the Times.

    1. Re:Hmm... by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "problem" with IRC is that it connects people. IRC isnt a breeding ground for weird stuff, humanity is.

      The main beef is that IRC is an old, open protocol with countless free servers out there. How are you supposed to charge 10 cents per instant message when such things exist?

      Babies are safer when you write a lot of checks. Beware free things, they're inherently evil and unamerican. IRC is like a slum (he doesnt mention which network, I'll assume they're all the same). AOL chat rooms are where high class individuals masturbate.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Hmm... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The WEB is mainstream. Most people just can't tell the difference between the www, ftp, e-mail, irc, and usenet. I get the strangest looks when I tell some people to type "eff tee pee colon slash slash" sometimes...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    3. Re:Hmm... by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The question remains though, should IRC be censored along with everything else...

      Umm, what's censored currently? Nobody reviews my webpages before I put them up. There are plenty of porn and even illegal porn sites out there that you can get onto if you want to spend the time. Warez exist still and with a little work i coudl probalby find any program authentification code I want. The only place there might be censorship would/could be Google or other search engines if they blocked certain searches.

      If by censorship, you mean when illegal activity is found it is acted against, it has been censored for a very long time. Long before the web became a household word, IRC warez were being traded and people were being arrested for doing so. Police are already in IRC looking for peadophiles just as they are chat rooms.

    4. Re:Hmm... by RLiegh · · Score: 1
      I get the strangest looks when I tell some people to type "eff tee pee colon slash slash" sometimes...

      Me too. That's exactly why I mostly don't talk tech with anyone in meat-space. Well, that and the oh noes my comptuar is teh borken plz fx thnx syndrome.
    5. Re:Hmm... by megarich · · Score: 1

      Lets ban IRC!!! While were at it, lets ban e-mail because you know people communicate evils through e-mail: virus', porn, other illegal stuff. You know what? That's not enough!!! Lets ban the telephone because people can plot and speak evil over it. Come to think of it, mail gotta be illegal too. Since they can't send there dirty little pics via irc and e-mail, Lord knows they'll go the good ol' snail mail route to send their filth! F*ck, lets just ban all forms of communication while were at it. Can't talk, can't plot no evil. Ha, there we go!!!! This is not a knock against you, just didn't know where else to post. Point is, evil comes from the inside and where there's a will there's a way. Thousands upon thousands of years of history should of shown that. Also, how can we expect the same government that give people slap of the wrist for killing another person to effectively police something like this?

    6. Re:Hmm... by js3 · · Score: 1

      nope, if you clean it up it will just end up elsewhere. IRC is a place for people with weird tastes to gather and do their thing. Kill irc and they'll end up on WASTE or DirectConnect or some place else. Many of the mainstream irc networks already ban warez or kiddy porn etc, but guess what, these weirdos now host their own irc servers

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    7. Re:Hmm... by System.out.println() · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you post a page on almost any hosting service, and put kiddie porn on it, it'll likely get taken down. If you host it yourself, they'll probably trace your IP address, shut down your domain, etc.

      But if you connect to IRC through a proxy there's very little anyone can do.

    8. Re:Hmm... by DragonMagic · · Score: 1

      Rizon IRC Networks is the Astalavista Box of IRC. IRC itself is not the problem, and places like Dal Net or EfNet that are just too large for their own good cannot always stop problematic clients or channels. Rizon, though, prouds itself as a haven of warez, cracks and piracy of movies and music. Have a problem with someone distributing your software and bring it up with the admins, they will k-line you, not the traders.

      To see how massive such an idea of illegality is, and probably how little people in law enforcement care about IRC, just see the server listing from Search IRC of currently linked servers on the network. It's frightening.

      P.S. This message is provided as education, as I do not condone nor promote piracy or warez in any format.

      --

      Human nature is the same everywhere; the modes only are different. -- Earl of Chesterfield
    9. Re:Hmm... by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      here are plenty of porn and even illegal porn sites out there that you can get onto if you want to spend the time.

      Or, if you don't want to spend time looking, there are several free services out there that will be happy to send you information on these sites via email.

    10. Re:Hmm... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "The question remains though, should IRC be censored along with everything else"

      Well if someone wants a censored IRC server, they can always run one themselves.

      In fact, you can just create a new room in most places, and censor/cleanup that room yourself.

      The question is, will anyone want to come and chat in your nice safe room or server?

    11. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! You are so dark and jaded. I am so impressed.

      We'll forget that cell phones are replacing land lines because they allow people to connect with people more convientely and often cheaper. It's all about evil.

      I get so sick of this "I am more jaded than you" crap that permeates /.

    12. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Umm, what's censored currently? Nobody reviews my webpages before I put them up. There are plenty of porn and even illegal porn sites out there that you can get onto if you want to spend the time.

      Working for a porn company, I can say that there is a lot of "hidden" and "undirect" censorship. We use to have paypal as a payment option on our site, and we had a good relationship with Paypal. (We had their VP's over for lunch one day). Now, Paypal wanted to become FDIC insured as a real bank. One of the Gov'T requirments before this could happen? They had to stop accepting payment for adult websites. While this certainly isn't "cenorship" in the strict sense, it is Gov'T control over what is or is not permissible. SO yes, there certainly is censorship just because YOU haven't been censored doesn't mean that the rest of us aren't. You just don't hear about it, which is, of course, the point of censorship.

    13. Re:Hmm... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I get so sick of this "I am more jaded than you" crap that permeates /.

      Hey, I'm sicker of the jadedness than you'll be ANY day! Hah, take that!

    14. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "gline *@proxy.host.here 3d You are banned" seems to work quite well :)

  24. they just discovered it? by Savatte · · Score: 2, Funny

    Talk about being late to a party. They are later than my girlfriend's period. zing!

  25. RE: Wow... by fshalor · · Score: 1

    I haven't been on any IRC stuff since like 1994/5. I'll have to go back and see what all the fuss is about.

    It'll be interesting to see, since according to the article and my conceptions of the time, it hasn't changed much in a decade. :)

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  26. Karma Whore by randomErr · · Score: 0
    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  27. And they think IRC is "the wilds" by Tangwei · · Score: 0

    Hrm.. maybe Goatse has escaped thier notice some how.... wonder the article they'd waste print on if they saw that along with his girlfriend Tubgirl.

  28. Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The NYT has an article on us being 'evil'! Just saw it on Slashdot, go see it :-P
    <creat1ve> What?
    <creat1ve> Damn.. they suck!!
    <creative> hack-bot, DDOS nytimes.com
    <hack-bot> Initializing DDOS

    ...

    <l1ght> Haha, nytimes.com down :-) That'll teach them to badmouth irc, thank god for that Slammer virus that let us build up those zombies!

    1. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by HeghmoH · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is such an obvious fake. If you're going to post made-up IRC discussions, you should at least use proper IRC grammar, such as no capital letters, missing or incorrect punctuation, etc. You're not even trying to be believable!

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      #hackers...yawn...lame.

      The one and only place was always #hack. With no "ers". On EFnet. Back before there was an EFnet as such...there was just "irc".

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      a) If it hadn't been a fake, nytimes.com might be down at the moment?
      b) It depends what channels you frequent. The ones where I go, the people tend to use capitals and punctuation.

    4. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you could say 'awhile' when it is appropriate...

    5. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      you must be in the wrong channels

      nobody 31337 has used punctuation or capitalization since 1995.

      the only reason you IRC is because you are backdoored, and part of my ddos net ;)

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    6. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by halo8 · · Score: 4, Funny

      +h3 ny+ h@z @N @r+ic13 0N u$ b3iNg '3vi1'! ju$+ $@\/\/ i+ 0N $1@$hd0+, g0 $33 i+ :-P
      \/\/h@+?
      d@MN.. +h3y $ux0r!!
      h@x0r-b0+, dd0$ ny+iM3$.c0M
      iNi+i@1iziNg dd0$ ...

      h@h@, ny+iM3$.c0M d0\/\/N :-) +h@+'11 +3@ch +h3M +0 b@dM0u+h irc, +h@N/ g0d ph0r +h@+ $1@Mm3r viru$ +h@+ 13+ u$ bui1d uP +h0$3 z0Mbi3$!

      --
      The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    7. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Nobody uses the leading 3 on 1337 anymore.

    8. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by siesta+at+uni · · Score: 1

      Please tell me you used a script to do that...

    9. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by Nobody+You+Know · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the damndest thing is, that compiles under Perl...

    10. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good god that's the funniest thing I''ve read on slashdot in at least 3 months

    11. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You went from "creat1ve" to "creative", talk about sloppy fake logs.

    12. Re:Just saw a discussion in #hackers... by Lancer · · Score: 1
      I'll second the AC -- that was hilarious!

      The scary bit, of course, is that I almost pasted it into vi to test it...

      --
      Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  29. Animal Porno? by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean the Discovery channel distributes on IRC? How many times have I seen two Rhinos doing the nasty with some British snooty guy narrating on PBS? Please, NY Times. This is nothing new. Heck, I even got a shot of flies getting busy on my balcony. You would think these New York City folk wouldn't be such prudes.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Animal Porno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG! What kind of insectual relations are those flies having?

    2. Re:Animal Porno? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny
      two Rhinos doing the nasty with some British snooty guy

      Am I the only one here with a dirty imagination?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Animal Porno? by isorox · · Score: 1

      How many times have I seen two Rhinos doing the nasty with some British snooty guy

      I don't know, I didn't realise you worked for Prince Charles

    4. Re:Animal Porno? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Damn tho, that would hurt. Rhinos? He must be pretty horny...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  30. Whatever by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, talk about your corporate motivated propoganda.

    the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb

    I guess the key here is well-policed, huh. Wouldn't want to offend.

    The problem that the corporate world has with IRC is that it's a network of humans, exchanging ideas and conversing freely. And, to make matters worse, they aren't paying a monthly/weekly/hourly fee to do so.

    I've read a lot of these "watch out for these free social based things on the internet, the only way to keep your kids safe is to stay on amazon.com with your credit card in hand" articles.

    Meh, fuckit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Whatever by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      And yet YOU like to troll all the Linux stories and make up bullshit about how you have insider SCO information and that they have a real case against Linux...

      What the fuck is wrong with you, man?

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    2. Re:Whatever by torokun · · Score: 1

      the problem is that obviously the excessively normal people like the journalist(s) who wrote this article have never been on IRC until they go looking for a story about something 'exotic'..

      well-policed could mean two things. it could mean cracking down on warezers. that would be a good thing, imho. but it could also mean cracking down on the animal porn, fetish crap, hack/phreak talk in general, obscenity, etc. that would be horrible, and a violation of free speech.

    3. Re:Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to bed America - your government is in control again.
      Here, watch this, shut up.
      You are free, to do as we tell you.

      Go back to bed America - your government is in control again.
      Here, here's American Gladiators, watch this, shut up.
      Go back to bed America.
      Here's American Gladiators, here's 56 channels of it.
      Watch these pitchuary retards bang their fuckin' skulls together, and congratulate you on living in the Land of Freedom.
      Here ya go America.
      You are free, to do as we tell you.

      -from "We Want Your Soul"

  31. Give me a break. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It never fails to amaze me how clueless ostensibly intelligent people can be. Um, hellooo? Reality called, left a message advising you get a clue! Noone put them on to the latest hardcore pron, they're likely to have a collective coronary. Liveing in their own little world...

  32. well behaved suburb??!!!?!?!?!?!? by genner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The internet is nothing remotley like a suburb, it's the wild west all over again complete with brothels and shoot outs. IRC and USENET where the orginal storehouses of sub-legal activities before P2P came along.

    1. Re:well behaved suburb??!!!?!?!?!?!? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the luddite who wrote the article means "Amazon, Yahoo, MSN, AOL" instead of "the internet." The internet is a den of sin and debauchery. People are stealing things all the time; code, pictures, software. It can't be enforced because any action by the enforcers will be circumvented. This scares people, and so they stay in their little gated communities and talk about how wonderful life is. These are the same people who sued Hustler and put warning labels on CDs: They don't want to admit to there being A) People different from themselves and B) Sex, drugs, alcohol, or other naughty things.

      They are the thought police we've been warned about. (A few of them are in alt.sex.pictures.baaa and then condemn us for being in alt.sex.pictures.chicks)

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    2. Re:well behaved suburb??!!!?!?!?!?!? by grrliegeek · · Score: 1
      I guess the online world does look like "a pleasant, well-policed suburb" when you're behind your nice safe firewall and censorsh^H^H^H^H^H content filtering software. If they did their research from the Times corporate offices (if they bothered to do any real research for this article, from the content I have my doubts), they obviously haven't seen what is really available via some well crafted keywords on Google. And nevermind Usenet, IM, etc that have already been mentioned.

      The thought of the internet being "policed" at all is a great laugh, I'm glad the paper is still good for something when you can't rely on its fact checking. His rosy Leave it to Beaver view of the internet is charming, if highly inaccurate.

      Apparently the person who wrote the article has no e-mail address, since he hasn't seen any get rick quick enlarge your p0le s0ftwarez cheap spam lately. He hasn't been flooded with IM spam or harassment so he must not have an IM account or has figured out how to use the privacy settings. He must not have figured out how to take out the privacy settings to see exactly how (not) well policed IM is, or doesn't care about investigative journalism. I guess he hasn't been in an AOHell chatroom in the last 5 years and gotten the obligatory A/S/L question a million times either. He hasn't gotten infected with any virii, Active Xpolits, browser hijackers, and his box hasn't been turned into a z0mbie hosting child p0rn and spam servers. He hasn't had a pissed off script kiddie sign him up for every free spam list in existance and DDOS his box into a smoking puddle. One wonders what internet he's logging into if it looks so orderly and lawful.

      What I have learned from this article - It's true: people who live in the suburbs are sheltered from the real world. They make armchair admonishments about the "bad neighborhoods" and get all Nobless Obligee about how "something should be done". Because they aren't in touch with the real world, their recommendations for improvement, if they offer any at all, are lacking in substance.

      The truly frightening thing that I saw was this:
      As more and more people get broadband, they are moving away from AOL and they still want to have chat.


      More people moving away from the AOL corral and into the general internet, wanting everything to be as b0rke^H^H^H^H^H easy as AOL??? Aaaaaaaaaaaaah!
      --
      Grrliegeek
  33. Oh, come on. by Lord+Graga · · Score: 1

    Did I ever say that I was good anyway? ;)

    1. Re:Oh, come on. by Mateito · · Score: 1
      What "Fill me up" Sex is Your "Hard-on" Robot?

      Where the hell did you find that link? Bloody funny.

      Bloody stupid, but funny as well.

  34. Blah blah. by garcia · · Score: 1

    It depends on where you go. Yes, IRC has that stuff available to you, so does Google.

    Stay out of #10YROLDZ4FORTIEZ and #h4ck3rz4h1r3 and you will be fine. There are plenty of decent channels out there that serve their purpose without falling into this "Wild Wild West" attitude.

    1. Re:Blah blah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay out of #10YROLDZ4FORTIEZ and #h4ck3rz4h1r3 and you will be fine.

      your link is broken, please fix and repost

  35. Running an IRC server... by ari_j · · Score: 1

    If I've run IRC servers for the past 8 years or better, does that make me more evil, or do I have to cite having run an NNTP server to get the prize? ;)

  36. Mmm. by dewc · · Score: 0

    God damn it. I'm not a freaking elite pirate! I only use IRC for chatting about girls, food, movies, games! Honest! Hell, I don't even know what an FSERV is!

  37. My own private IM network by randomErr · · Score: 1

    I actually setup a company server IM using GAIM and IRC. It worked really well.

    I wonder how many of these nar-do-wells are using IRC servers on port 80?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:My own private IM network by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Gaim + IRC does anything but "work well"... You should at least get a decent client like X-chat. ;)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:My own private IM network by randomErr · · Score: 1

      Ummm... well... your chat client's site is down.

      Not instilling a lot of faith here. Plus if I'm not mistaken XChat is not as user friendly as Gaim. If some one else has something I could use like GAIM that doesn't use Java and runs on WIN32 I'm all for it.

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  38. How about the Post? by michael+path · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news, the Washington Post discovers that they have the internet for computers now.

  39. I agree with this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that fights software piracy. "If they were only associating with each other and inbreeding, maybe we could coexist alongside them. But it doesn't work that way. What they're doing on I.R.C. has a way of permeating into mainstream piracy.'' Ahhh the good old days before mp3 and P2P networking...you actually had to know something to find something....search engines like Google wouldn't turn up things on IRC (well some do now like packetnews and ircspy....but that's another story.)

    1. Re:I agree with this: by usrusr · · Score: 1

      when i read the article, i was surprised to read something that reasonable by a bsa person. seeing a difference between some people in the know spending their spare time with some-not-so-legal-things-to-do-with-ip and Unlimited Piracy For The Masses is close to the exact opposite of the usual copying==terrorism non-logic.

      --
      [i have an opinion and i am not afraid to use it]
  40. IRC freedom in the crosshairs again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What greater threat to Terrany is there
    than freedom of speech?

    Now even in IRC, the 1st admendment is under attack!

    Why do people think being controlled by others is somehow 'Safer', when no-one controls the controllers?

  41. Full link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No registration:
    http://www.goupstate.com/apps/pbcs. dll/article?AID =/20040506/ZNYT05/405060413/1051/NEWS01

  42. Bwhahahahaha by Lord+Graga · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that fights software piracy."

    rofl,im1337h4xx0r!iwill0wnj00rb0x0r!

  43. they're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to go to IRC quite a bit, and it really is the most "underground" you can go, cracking & warez mainly, it's just so completely unpoliced, but also it's wrong to paint the whole thing with one brush, many go just to chat, simple as that.

  44. Some names just don't have that ring to them... by jejones · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Quite often, once they get their hands on a prerelease, they will use I.R.C. as the first distribution before it goes out into the wider Internet," Brad A. Buckles, the [RIAA]'s executive vice president for antipiracy efforts, said in a telephone interview.

    One has to give the author credit for getting one thing right, though:

    In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. Windows has holes that can allow a hacker to install almost anything on a computer that lacks a protective program or device called a firewall. Users' vulnerability can be compounded if they have not installed the latest patches from Microsoft.

  45. Suprnova... by OriginalChops · · Score: 1

    You think IRC is evil because people can share files easily? good thing they dont know about suprnova.... And thats part of the "well policed" part of the internet. It's the most ignorant thing ive ever read in a newspaper!

    1. Re:Suprnova... by dknight · · Score: 1

      Suprnova is more policed than you think. Why just lack week I had my net connection terminated by Cox thanks to an MPAA letter about a movie being shared through suprnova.

    2. Re:Suprnova... by OriginalChops · · Score: 1

      Yes I had one too... Nothing happend. It's just scare tactics.

    3. Re:Suprnova... by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1
      3 fans, 2 freaks. 5 people with too much free time.
      Err, wouldn't that be 6? Seven counting me? ;)
      --
      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. more than 500,000 by lart2150 · · Score: 1

    where did they get their info?

    "Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time..."

    1. Re:more than 500,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they arent counting the sheer amount of lurkers.

  48. Well of course. by i_am_pi · · Score: 1

    A totally biased article about a topic that they only cursorly researched. WareZ kiddies also use Hotline, Carracho (for Mac), and simply giving out FTP links over AIM. Nothing revolutionary, and a ton of hype.

  49. Persuading access to freenode by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    My University blocks IRC.
    Not easy without internet at home.

    How can I convince them to allow access to this one server?

    At the moment I have to use a java applet. I know, I should get a shell.

    1. Re:Persuading access to freenode by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I use Freeshell.org and have a MetaARPA account, which allows for SSH tunneling via port 443 (secure HTTP), which is open on most networks. Works very well, and only requires a small donation to Freeshell.org. The tunneling allows me to use X-Chat, or I can just log in via SSH, through port 443, and use a text-based client like IRSSI.

      http://freeshell.org/index.cgi?access

      I think that $36 per year is pretty reasonable for the MetaARPA features (only equals $3 per month). Of course, you can always just do the same thing on a box at home, but you're still going to have to use a cable modem or something if you want to have a somewhat usable connection.

      If anyone needs information on how to tunnel with SSH, please please feel free to ask.

    2. Re:Persuading access to freenode by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Consider using server irc.us.freenode.net port 7000. Most university IRC blocks, including mine, are only on port 6667.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  50. NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by darthcamaro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live on IRC and sure as 'hell' don't consider myself to be evil. This lame ass journo probably got flamed and didn't know what do to. IRC is better than IM and is used by anyone and everyone in the dev community. I can't imagine participating in any of the FOSS projects that I do without IRC - it just wouldn't be possible.
    Speaking of which, is there a /. specific channel on Freenode?

    1. Re:NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, even communists are using IRC for their evil OSS propaganda. Repent, you evil-doer!

    2. Re:NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1
      You might consider reading the article:
      quote:
      Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time, and many of them are engaged in legitimate activities, network administrators say.

      quote:
      When I.R.C. started in the 1980's, it was best known as a way for serious computer professionals worldwide to communicate in real time. It is still possible - though sometimes a bit difficult - to find mature technical discussions among the tens of thousands of I.R.C. chat rooms, known as channels, operating at any one time. There are also respectable I.R.C. systems and channels - some operated by universities or Internet service providers - for gamers seeking opponents or those who want to talk about sports or hobbies.

      quote:
      Yet I.R.C. has its advocates, who point to its legitimate uses.
      "I.R.C. is where all of the kids come on and go nuts,'' William A. Bierman, a college student in Hawaii who helps develop I.R.C. server software and who is known online as billy-jon, said in a telephone interview. "All of the attention I.R.C. has gotten over the years has been because it's a haven for criminals, which is a very one-sided view.
      "The whole idea behind I.R.C. is freedom of speech. There is really no structure on the Internet for policing I.R.C., and there are intentionally no rules.
      quote:
      That [file transfer] capability has a lot of legitimate uses for transferring big files that would be rejected by an e-mail system. Want to send your brother across the country a digital copy of your home movie without burning a disc and putting it in the mailbox? The file-transfer capability in I.R.C. may be the most convenient way.

      etc...
      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    3. Re:NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speaking of which, is there a /. specific channel on Freenode?
      Theres a slashdot specific network: Slashnet.
    4. Re:NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they either got really flamed, or they had that one yearly inspiration for that hack-writer bit about the star wars scene they described. They probably got that thought and asked, "where can I fit that in?" Then, after it was written, they tried to find facts to back it up and or did real research for facts like the MS Win holes.

    5. Re:NYT - don't they fabricate their stories??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the two pages of FUD.

  51. What a load of BS by phyruxus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    IRC isn't any different, really, than a web page or a video cast. It's all just bits. The reason NYT can't understand this isn't that they're dumb, it's that they're inherently journalists not technologists.

    IRC isn't "where animal porn comes from", animal porn comes from people who like animal porn. Failure to apprehend this fact smacks of gross stupidity. IRC is just a chatroom. It's exactly the same as an AOL chatroom or an ICQ chatroom. The room isn't the place, the conversants are the place. Conversations can happen Anywhere. Plus our Constitution (you know, that thing Dubya keeps trying to shred) GARUANTEES us the right to free speech and peacable assembly. IRC is not some magical source of villainy, it's every streetcorner in America rolled into one blank page awaiting words.

    IRC isn't the problem. People are the problem. And we already have the solution. It's called the code of law. Not that the law is always the best law, but my point is that IRC is neither good nor evil, merely a tool. People who realize this can take the proper step, which is to try to fight the problem not the symptom. People who don't realize this make total asses of themselves in very public fora.

    "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" - Homer

    PS, I didn't RTFA because I'm too lazy. Did YOU rtfa? ;-) Okay, then flame on, but please post a link without registration so I can rtfa and flame you back. One.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:What a load of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have learned of Bugmenot by now!
      www.bugmenot.com
      is easy to use, grab the address where registration is needed, insert in window at Bugmenot, it gives you login name and password.

      the one Bugmenot had is Login: slashdot666
      password: slashdot

      enjoy!

    2. Re:What a load of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that americans must make references to the american constitution and american laws when they talk about the internet? 90% of the planet doesn't give a flying fsck about american anything.

      _If_ the internet was to be policed, what laws would be followed, certainly not american ones.

      Anonymous Efnet admin who runs a non .us server /me wanders back to legally filling CDs with mp3s (cause he paid token royalties on the blanks) and loving not being under american laws

    3. Re:What a load of BS by phyruxus · · Score: 1

      >>You should have learned of Bugmenot by now!
      >>www.bugmenot.com is easy to use, grab the
      >>address where registration is needed, insert in
      >>window at Bugmenot, it gives you login name and
      >>password. the one Bugmenot had is Login: slashdot666
      >>password: slashdot
      >>enjoy!

      Thanks!

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    4. Re:What a load of BS by phyruxus · · Score: 1
      First, you make a good point and I agree that such things are rampant.

      Now in answer to your question: "Why is it that americans must make references to the american constitution and american laws when they talk about the internet? 90% of the planet doesn't give a flying fsck about american anything."

      We do it for the same reason you asked your question. 90% of the planet may not give a flying Fsck, but we americans say everything with big brother looking over our shoulder. That's why we couch things in americanism, to allow Big Brother to understand it. Not to mention, maybe I was talking to my fellow americans? Don't forget that sometimes, you're listening to a truly american (polish/japanese/muslim/maori/etc) conversation and just 'cuz it's on the internet, you think it should be internationalized? maybe, but I don't think so.

      further, specifically in my post, I was posting in a thread about an article written by an american newspaper. I posted it to slashdot, but I my primary target audience was the NYT people.. I wished they could see it as I do and so I posted what I posted. Although of course, the secondary audience is really the true primary.. If I was riled up enough to actually tell the NYT what I thought I'd have written a letter to the editor.

      Sorry to sound so Nation centric... but it's not my fault i'm a patriotic person... blame the propaganda war. Hell, blame yourself.. have you ever uttered a sentence to another person which had no context, no negativity, and was without flaw? If so, congrats on your godhood.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
      "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    5. Re:What a load of BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have you ever uttered a sentence to another person which had no context, no negativity, and was without flaw? If so, congrats on your godhood. Once I said "Good morning". I think I'll go create some worlds now...

  52. Godwin's Law by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...and I.R.C. users speculate that terrorists also use the networks to communicate in relative obscurity.

    Am I the only one who thinks Godwin's law needs a new corrolary?

    --
    There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
    1. Re:Godwin's Law by Webz · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those of you who had no idea what Godwin's Law was... Definition, courtesy of The Jargon Dictionary.

    2. Re:Godwin's Law by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

      booyeah!
      s/Hitler/terrorist

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    3. Re:Godwin's Law by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "For those of you who had no idea what Godwin's Law was"

      Err, this is Slashdot. Who were you expecting not to know about Godwin's law?

    4. Re:Godwin's Law by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Someone came up with that idea quite awhile ago here on /., but I don't recall the story or context, unfortunately. It was along the lines of:

      "Ashcroft's Corollary to Godwin's Law: As a debate proceeds, the probability that one or more parties will be accused of being or supporting terrorists will approach 1."

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  53. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Just calling them "chatrooms" makes me think you're full of shit.

  54. google link by xiopher · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:google link by ChronoWiz · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I was beginning to go crazy not having a google link...

  55. Do you remember? by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    irc.aohell.org
    irc.colorado.edu
    irc.ais.net
    irc -2.ais.net
    irc.emory.edu

    Ahh the good old days...

    oh, don't forget

    baltimore.md.us.undernet.org

    That was also a quite popular one... hehehehe

    1. Re:Do you remember? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I hooked up with 4 girls IRL through IRC. Please share your numbers here. :)

    2. Re:Do you remember? by bechthros · · Score: 1

      irc.uchicago.edu was good too

  56. All too common nowadays... by mattgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One more established form of media just disparages another because it doesn't understand it, or because it fears it. It's a shame, because average newspaper readers inevitably equate, "IRC = bad," and continue to spread the hearsay when it comes up in conversation.

    What are they smoking, anyways? The web is anything but a well-policed suburb. If anything, it's a middle school that is in perpetual recess. They just know if they were to apply these same arguments to the web that people would not stand for their bullshit.

    Once again, social acceptability shows itself to be completely arbitrary.

    1. Re:All too common nowadays... by idiotnot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The print media look down on something different from their lofty, tradition-bound medium? Say it ain't so! They're objective journalists.* They'd never do such a thing.

      (But don't mention Jayson Blair, the USA Today dude, or William Randolph Hearst, lest you get your shins bitten).

      *journalist: n. a reporter who refuses to think.

  57. Too late by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    Damn!
    They'd have published this article this morning itself

    /me thought that irc is cool and it's only this afternoon that quite a few of my new friends were asking for the password of a certain user account named 'root'
    And now my system's behaving funny
    wonder wha..
    [Connection lost]

  58. I hope I'm the first to say this by asoap · · Score: 1
    asoap sets mode -v nyt

    -asoap

    --
    Treat me like a marketing stat, and I'll treat your movie like a series of ones and zeros
  59. What about Yahoo! Chat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If IRC is evil, then Yahoo! Chat is the 7th level of Hell. At least IRC has real moderators.

  60. I guess I'm a "hacker"? by Nosf3ratu · · Score: 0

    From the article: An official from the Recording Industry Association of America said that some hackers even obtain albums that have been recorded but not yet released.

    So because I (HYPOTHETICALLY) got Amnesiac two months before it hit store shelves, I'm a hacker? I'm a terrorist? I trade child porn?

    It's a real shame, I once took the NYT with a shred of credibility. I should have learned to completely ignore their bullshit after the whole Jayson Blair fiasco.

    --
    The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori
  61. Wow, more brainlessness by AnotherLostAtom · · Score: 1

    All I can say is, I can't believe it. Hopefully the media will start to realize they have to take this Internet thing very seriously. IRC == Evil. Popy Cock!!! What about MSN messenger then?? Why is that not evil, oh, sorry those are all IQ of Below 120, I forgot that minor detail. Can you till I'm a little angry about human stupidity. ;P

  62. Article without registration by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    Read it here. Just cancel the print request... :P

  63. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    true, true

  64. Oh that's just wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I notice the "good" dog is tan, while the evil porno-loving dog in all the garbage is a bit "brown".

    Now I'm not insinuating anything. That's just what I noticed. :-)

  65. Newsgroups still under the radar by rbanzai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although my 65 year-old father has been using newsgroups for years for his cancer support contacts the mainstream media still doesn't have a clue about them. It's kind of amazing since these weenies don't have anything else to do other than dig up things to try and scare the public with.

    As for IRC I'm sure it's the pit of sin and mania that they describe but really, so what? Any communication stream will be used that way!

    I've tried IRC a couple of time but have to admit I don't know how to use it properly. I've tried about five different IRC clients and still am completely lost when I try and do anything.

    Maybe if I wait long enough it will be replaced by something that doesn't confuse me. :)

    1. Re:Newsgroups still under the radar by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      "I've tried IRC a couple of time but have to admit I don't know how to use it properly. I've tried about five different IRC clients and still am completely lost when I try and do anything. Maybe if I wait long enough it will be replaced by something that doesn't confuse me. :)"

      Here's an excellent (IMHO) multi-platform IRC client, with an easy-to-navigate GUI that automates a majority of common '/*' commands to button clicks or pull-down menus, and has decent security. http://www.xchat.org/download/

      Here's an excellent quick reference of commands, etc. http://www.newircusers.com/ircmds.html

      P.S. I am not associated in any way with either of those posted entities, just a happy user.
      HTH :)

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    2. Re:Newsgroups still under the radar by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Maybe if I wait long enough it will be replaced by something that doesn't confuse me. :)

      Uh, like chat rooms and IM? AOL, Yahoo and MSN had that covered long ago.

      I never got into IRC, either. Last time I tried it told me I needed identd running. I think the techie barrier to entry is intentional.

      Wandering OT: Speaking of networks with tech barriers to entry, Freenet's clients from April 30 and later have bidirectional routing, even for transient/temporary nodes. The network is running better than it has in a year or more; I'm waiting for a Slashdot story to mention the improvements and see if Freenet can handle the influx of nodes. I think it might this time. Back on-topic: Wait 'till the NYT tries Freenet!

    3. Re:Newsgroups still under the radar by brumby · · Score: 1

      Although my 65 year-old father has been using newsgroups for years for his cancer support contacts the mainstream media still doesn't have a clue about them. It's kind of amazing since these weenies don't have anything else to do other than dig up things to try and scare the public with.

      Usenet has already had one go around with the press, but the net was a lot smaller then, so it didn't get as far. In the early 90's, a reporter called Joe Abernathy 'discovered' alt.sex, and wrote up an expose on taxpayers dollars being abused for porn chat lines. (There should be stuff on this if you google, I'm at work, so I can't use 'alt.sex' in a search term right now. :-) There was a reasonable amount of fallout, the university I attended at the time tried to ban Usenet altogether, and finally settled for blocking any newsgroup with sex or drugs in the name. (The same University also dropped Usenet support last year, telling people to buy accounts with a web based usenet service if they need it.) I expect that some day another 'reporter' will discover Usenet, and repeat the whole Abernathy thing.

  66. Usenet? IRC? EVIL?? Haha try FREENET by JavaLord · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hah, you guys are talking about how usenet will make their heads explode? Image if they found freenet? I don't know if a high percentage cryptomanics/cypher punks are sexual deviants or if the deviants are just attracted to freenet somehow, but that place is will make your stomach turn if you get offended by anything questionable.

  67. wha wha wha? by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

    Internet's Evils, from animal pornography

    If that's evil then I don't want to be good ;)

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  68. Mainstream Press might be on to something? by kc0dby · · Score: 4, Informative

    In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. Windows has holes that can allow a hacker to install almost anything on a computer that lacks a protective program or device called a firewall. Users' vulnerability can be compounded if they have not installed the latest patches from Microsoft.

    Finally, its good to see it in the NYT. It was starting to get old seeing it on /. every day without anybody else picking it up....

    --
    I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
  69. Off Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I'd love to hear their hard-hitting expose about Pittsburgh

    Actually I WOULD love to read that. Pittsburgh (The City Gov't.) is broke. The taxes are so high people are leaving in droves and no new business will open up shop here. So the higher taxes go, the less money they collect. It's a cycle with an ugly ending. The whole downtown area closes down by 6pm because it's deserted, nobody lives there, nobody to shop. People staying in the hotels walk outside and get that "spooky feeling". The politicians are petty self indulgent yokels. The population is the second largest concentration of senior citizens outside of Dade County Miami, and they vote like it. (They also fill the roads with meandering land yachts.) Young people flee like the plague is here. Suburban Sprawl / Walmart-itis is a real problem outside the city. It's a real shame, because it's absolutely beautiful here. The Portland Oregon of the Appalachians if you're just talking physical comparisons.

    People and politicians here just spout rhetoric and infight. We have more "Young People's Action Groups" than we have young people. I love this town for so many good reasons, but it's getting harder and harder to justify staying here.

    1. Re:Off Topic by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > It's a real shame, because it's absolutely beautiful here.

      Which part of Pittsburgh do you live in? Last time I was there (less than a year ago, I lived in Wheeling WV at the time) it was still a dirt hole. Nothing like Detroit, mind you, but Pittsburgh is dark, dank, dirty, and the downtown road system had to have been designed by a gaggle of morons. aA billion one-way streets, 167 degree turns -- and who the hell was the civil engineering wizard that decided it should straddle a river? There aren't enough bridges for the terrible infrastucture.
      What about the South Side bridge (don't recall the real name) that goes by Hooters? 5 lanes. Sometimes the middle lane goes one way, sometimes it goes another. If you're there on really "special" events, there are four lanes going one way and one lane the other. Christ, I'm surprised the city hasn't been bankrupted from lawsuits on just that bridge. Ridiculous.

      I know, the problem with Pittsburgh was that it grew up from a very old city, when city planners weren't a reality, and with all the tall buildings today it would be impossible to redo everything, but they could certainly clean up the mess a little. There isn't any logical need for a three-lane one-way road through the center of downtown.

  70. Re:Lol by Orgazmus · · Score: 5, Funny

    and "moderator" dont help

    its called #channels and operators.
    n00b

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  71. vilification by phyruxus · · Score: 1
    Not to sound paranoid but...

    It's part of the natural dialectical process that the new cool kid on the block (us computer nerds and our hard-to-understand 50 We nerds should unionize. I'm not joking. Like MENSA but for slashdot surfing, beer loving, code-slinging geeks like you and me.

    I'm not asking you to be with me. I'm asking Everyone to consider who they identify with.... their fellow nerd, or the Man serving, lie slinging spinmeisters who would rather see us be loyal to themselves before each other.

    Think about it. Then flame the )(@#&%^ out of me, but don't forget what I said.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." ~Voltaire
    "d'Oh!" ~Homer
    1. Re:vilification by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      Then flame the )(@#&%^ out of me, but don't forget what I said.

      Just when I thought I could read l337 ... I can't translate that word you wrote!

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  72. pleasant, well policed suburbs AREN'T EITHER by potus98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The suburbs is where all the s#!t happens that everyone *thinks* is limited to the "inner city".

    Leading market for gang growth and presence? The burbs.

    Leading market of drug users and drug spending? The burbs.

    Leading market for pr0n? Burbs.

    By far the leading market for SUVs (speaking of so-called evil)? Burbs.

    Number one users of so-called Earth killing pollutants? Burbs.

    The list goes on and on and on...

    Why do so many entities (read: media) STILL portray the suburbs as some sort of pure, loving, pastures of solice? The suburbs are like a nice, ripe tomato: All shiny and pretty on the surface, but a disgusting mess 1mm below the surface.

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    1. Re:pleasant, well policed suburbs AREN'T EITHER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is sooo true

    2. Re:pleasant, well policed suburbs AREN'T EITHER by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      The suburbs is where all the s#!t happens that everyone *thinks* is limited to the "inner city".

      Leading market for gang growth and presence? The burbs.

      Leading market of drug users and drug spending? The burbs.

      No one says the bad stuff is limited to inner cities, but it's well established there. And your mentioned "growth" is a well misleading word:
      Example: There were 1000 killings in the city last year, and 1010 this year. There were 2 killings in the suburbs last year, and 4 this year. Which means the growth is 1% in the city and 100% in the suburbs. Oh my god! Look at the growth! It's so bad in the suburbs, time to move back to the city!

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    3. Re:pleasant, well policed suburbs AREN'T EITHER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By far the leading market for SUVs (speaking of so-called evil)? Burbs.
      Number one users of so-called Earth killing pollutants? Burbs.


      I am buying a new car, and over the last few weeks I have been trying to decide if I should get the regular Ford Escape or the new hybrid model.

      I just wanted to let you know that after reading your post I have decided to buy the gas guzzler model.

      Hava a great day!!! :)

  73. What a load of shit... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is still possible - though sometimes a bit difficult - to find mature technical discussions among the tens of thousands of I.R.C. chat rooms, known as channels, operating at any one time.

    What the hell? How is it difficult to find mature technical discussions? What do you want to discuss? Windows? Type "/list windows". Linux? "/list linux". When the results are complete, click the channel you want. Simple. Use your head, if results come back "#linux_sluts - Sluts who get naked and slutty for linux guys XXX", then chances are that's not a good place to discuss the latest kernel.

    These news articles are always reporting about unnecessary things. Why target IRC? AOL has the same type of shit. Take a look in the member created chat rooms... "m4m will swallow" "my dog, ur place" "azn m4 hamster" "canadian hookers" etc..

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:What a load of shit... by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > #linux_sluts - Sluts who get naked and slutty for linux guys XXX

      Don't waste your time--SkankForLinus69 is a big tease.

    2. Re:What a load of shit... by isorox · · Score: 1

      if results come back "#linux_sluts - Sluts who get naked and slutty for linux guys XXX", then chances are that's not a good place to discuss the latest kernel.

      Which networks that?!?!?

  74. Back in Da Day by MilkmanIAC · · Score: 1

    I remember in '95 when the regulars in #hottub were just starting to get the hang of /on join commands, and Oreo thought it was a good idea to have 6 sessions all protectin each other from the newly popularized autokicks....... Simple as it was, it was amusin to kick them all out in the same alias..... And nameserv actually worked, -SabrTooth (formerly enm52910@uxa)

  75. I like the way they spell 'elite' by ziggamon · · Score: 0

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates"

    Come on people... everyone knows it's 31337 !

  76. Uh.... what? by KeeperS · · Score: 5, Insightful
    the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb

    Uh... it has? Are we using the same internet? The internet is full of spammers, annoying flash and pop-up advertising, worms, spyware, and all kinds of other undesirable things. If anything, it sounds more like the ghetto to me, not a well-policed suburb.

    a little-known neighborhood known as Internet Relay Chat

    Little known? I wouldn't call IRC mainstream, but it's certainly not obscure either.

    Anyway, given the crap ratio of that quote, I don't think I'll bother to read the article. (Gasp! What's this, someone posting without reading the article?)

    1. Re:Uh.... what? by torokun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      one issue -- i would argue that irc _is_ obscure. i don't think the vast majority of people (over 90%) on the net now have ever even heard of irc.

      she said 500k were on irc, and there are, i'm sure now, more than 1000 times that on the net.

    2. Re:Uh.... what? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should stop surfing the web in Windows..

    3. Re:Uh.... what? by Petronius · · Score: 1

      you forgot: mandatory registration systems to be allowed to read articles.

      --
      there's no place like ~
    4. Re:Uh.... what? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      About one billion people estimated on the net for 2004, so that would be 2000 times as much.

      However, those surveys are usually counting anyone that uses the internet once in a week or so, I would except much lower numbers for everyday users.

      500k is about a daily average the four "big" networks (IRCnet, EFnet, Undernet and QuakeNet), bit over double wouldn't probably be too far fetched if you count all the small ones in.

  77. Two Comments by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 3, Funny

    >And if you're on IRC, remember, you're evil.

    First, that's Doctor Evil to you.

    Second, one wonders what sort of fit the NYT would have if someone ever tells them about Usenet.
    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  78. One of my old sigs was... by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..."IRC: Making megalomaniacs out of little boys since 1985" :P

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    1. Re:One of my old sigs was... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      ..."IRC: Making megalomaniacs out of little boys since 1985" :P

      That's pretty k3w1 considering IRC was invented in 1988.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:One of my old sigs was... by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

      Eh, it may have been '88 in the sig. It's been a while, I put that date in the above post from fuzzy memory.

      I *did* research the earliest mention of IRC usage before I started using the sig back in the day, if that helps mollify you. :P

      --

      "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  79. The point by hartba · · Score: 0

    I thought the whole point of the internet was to share files and exchange ideas. Once they take that away, I might as well just watch TV.

    --
    60 percent of the time, my comments are right everytime.
  80. eMail by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is not exactly that in email as a whole you will not find pornography, saying something that could break copyright laws (is not so common sending i.e. movies by email, but i bet could be send how to download them), offensive language, etc (and that, leaving spam on a side). Mailing lists don't do things much better. And email is truly used by everyone, not like IRC.

    Of course, is used also for useful things, and even they will agree that the email should not be regulated or banned because some people do a bad use of it.

  81. 500,000 users? more than that. by solidox · · Score: 1
    according to searchirc there are, at the time of writing...
    There are currently 1,235,632 users on 7,650 servers.
    --
    1. Re:500,000 users? more than that. by Audigy · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it should break those users down by client version...

      I bet very many of those are bots.

      --
      [an error occured while processing this directive]
  82. An IRC Tutorial by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    HERE is the link.

  83. Wait till they find all the pr0n by bl8n8r · · Score: 4, Funny

    The soccer moms are going to freak out.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:Wait till they find all the pr0n by Cervantes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, it's the soccer moms getting freaky that constitutes most of the pr0n.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  84. Need proof? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't believe IRC is evil? Just try logging on with an even remotely female-sounding nick sometime.

    1. Re:Need proof? by Fullmetal+Edward · · Score: 1

      PFFT! REAL IRC users don't care about gender as long as you have the latest GBA roms :P

      --
      --- [Insert intresting Sig here]
    2. Re:Need proof? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Don't believe IRC is evil? Just try logging on with an even remotely female-sounding nick sometime.

      I hacked together a perl bot using the eliza module, created a sexy sounding female persona on a talker (chat program a little bit like IRC) and logged the bot onto it.

      The results were rather amusing.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    3. Re:Need proof? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is why you are in the habit of doing that? :)

    4. Re:Need proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u hang out in #gbatemp, right?

    5. Re:Need proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Rorschach1 is female? That would be a pretty good reason to try a female-sounding nickname. And also a good reason to choose a slashdot nickname with ambiguous gender, such as "Rorschach1".

    6. Re:Need proof? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      " Don't believe IRC is evil? Just try logging on with an even remotely female-sounding nick sometime."

      You mean like the thousands of bald, fat, middle-aged men who do? :-P

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    7. Re:Need proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if you need help with a technical issue *fast*, log into IRC with a female-sounding nick.

  85. Because freedom of speech only results in evil by Zarxrax · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Countries across the world dislike the United States. We have no morals, crime runs rampant, etc, etc. It's because we have free speech of course. Countries like china filter the internet to prevent free speech, thus preventing the evil. Apparently now, the new york times also agrees that free speech only breeds evil. Only when everyone's thoughts can be controlled, and made to conform to what the people in charge think is the "right way" will evil cease to exist.

  86. xchat!?!? by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

    There's this binary lurking around in my /usr/bin
    is it ok to run it!?!

  87. Yeah its just getting worse and worse... by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read somewhere that criminals and terrorists and child molestors and pirates also communicated on telephones!? Its not like people have the right to freely talk to eachother so lets restrict the telephone system. Maybe only approved people should be allowed phones?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Yeah its just getting worse and worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe only approved people should be allowed phones?"

      Maybe the FBI should spend all their time listening to these phone conversations.

  88. Thank God! by crull · · Score: 1

    Thank God I'm on Quakenet, all we got here is 15 year old gamers trying to get sponsors for their e-sports achievements.

    Not a single one of those on LinkNet though.

    --
    this is not my signature.
  89. it would never do any good to censor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    becuase then people will just use other channels of communication. end result is a never-ending wack-a-mole game.

  90. Is the point to make us all look like criminals? by Random+Guru+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use IRC pretty often, and I've been a chanop in quite a few places (including some on EFNet, #1 in all of IRC!). Certainly, a lot of pirating goes on, but it still pales in comparison to people just going on to hang out with people with similar interests and/or careers from around the globe and talk shop or shit. The NYT's look at things, however, makes one think that all us IRC users are criminals and terrorists.

    But then again, what would you expect from such a fascist rag?

    IRC is a great place to communicate with others or find stuff that isn't available elsewhere (like anime titles that haven't been licensed for distribution in N. America). Actual pirating is bigger outside of IRC, and many of these so-called 'elite' pirates would use something more secure than IRC to communicate with each other.

    Simply put, the NYT has once again shown that it's not worth the paper it's printed on (or the electrons it's sending).

    --
    Christopher S. 'coldacid' Charabaruk -- coldacid.net
  91. Initgame anyone? by HDlife · · Score: 1
    Boy do I miss InitGame. That was the day when Gopher was king, Moria was more fun than homework, MIT had guest external guest accounts, and Initgame could waste a whole night!

    Ahh. The good old days.

    1. Re:Initgame anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Init game was the best. I tried to explain it to people, and they just stare at me blankly.

      The only bad thing about initgame was when cricketers (is that a word) would take over the channel. Soccer stars and Cricket stars would always be my downfall.

  92. oh, of course by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, IRC, along somewhat with newsgroups, form the sort of back streets and dirty alleys that people find sort of distasteful. And yes, pretty much anything you might care to want is there on IRC or USENET for the taking, whether copied games or copied media or porn.

    Or, friends you never met, meeting nightly to commiserate and socialize, or to trade tips on their favorite games, or just to let common interests bring them together.

    That's what this whole internet thing was built for in the first place - communication *between* *people*. (True, people at universities and in the military, but...) Not sitting passively in front of the computer having a corporate content pipe shoved down your throat.

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  93. Well, that's a start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yeah, any place folks can go that allows easy two-way communication with no public archive (or at least with no information that allow unique identification) is going to play host to all sorts of discussion, from Anarchy to Zoology. In addition to IRC, the following are also used for those nasty activities:

    Usenet

    Person-to-Person chat (AIM, ICQ, MSNM etc.)

    Private forums (almost every eeeeeevil cheat site has 'em)

    VoIP chat (examples: Teamspeak, Ventrillo servers)

    If the NYT wants to extend their search for compu-terrorist breeding grounds, this sort of stuff is also happening:

    Via e-mail

    In school cliques

    at LAN parties

    While eeeevil people are just hangin' out at home

    Today marks the day I've lost all respect for the New York Times. Honestly, how could you take this rag seriously any more?

  94. The good people use Jabber by AIXadmin · · Score: 0

    Thats why Jabber was invented. So the good people didn't have to use IRC.

  95. The WWW has far more evil than IRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    case in point, the millions of websites (many of which are misspellings of popular legitimate sites) where if you don't have an ad blocker, you'll be closing shit for hours. Sure IRC has DoS attacks, but if you don't go out of your way to piss people off you're pretty much safe.

  96. Seth Schiesel Is Just Trying to Sell Papers by Milican · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We use IRC every day for legitimate work. We're not the only ones. Don't take my word for it though. Check out this link. We progam, chat every day on IRC, and use source control tools to get our work done. This article while accurate in many ways was very unbalanced. That is a mark of poor journalism and is only done to sell newspapers. This is expected of publications like The Enquirer, but should not be the mark of the NYT.

    JOhn

    1. Re:Seth Schiesel Is Just Trying to Sell Papers by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Poor journalism? At a the Times? Never! All their reporters are ethical, honest, hardworking folks!

  97. sensationalist ? by gmack · · Score: 1

    No kidding.

    In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. Windows has holes that can allow a hacker to install almost anything on a computer that lacks a protective program or device called a firewall. Users' vulnerability can be compounded if they have not installed the latest patches from Microsoft.

    This makes it sound like all you have to do is plug a windows machine into the net and your in trouble. As much as I can't stand working with windows I find this to be over the top.

    1. Re:sensationalist ? by idiot900 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This makes it sound like all you have to do is plug a windows machine into the net and your in trouble. As much as I can't stand working with windows I find this to be over the top.

      Actually, it's not over the top at all. There are a number of worms that will infect a Windows box as soon as it's plugged in. I've seen a new XP install get infected within 20 minutes of first bootup.

    2. Re:sensationalist ? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      you've not tried to install many windows lately

      trying to run windows update on a non patched machine is n invite to a blaster storm!

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:sensationalist ? by vida · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This makes it sound like all you have to do is plug a windows machine into the net and your in trouble. As much as I can't stand working with windows I find this to be over the top.

      It is kinda true. Plug in an unpatched win2k/xp and odds are, within hours, you'll get blaster, sasser and variations of one of these magnificent pieces of engineering. If you don't have at least a software based firewall, within maybe a couple days some script kiddy took advantage of an unpatched hole and your PC just joined the army of zombies of spammer X.

      I've done it. Put a PC on a diff subnet at home, don't allow traffic between subnets, and sniff what happens...

    4. Re:sensationalist ? by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      What did you do, go to Kazaa, and search for exe's named Patch or something?

      --
      | - | - |
    5. Re:sensationalist ? by Vann_v2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If your machine is unpatched, it's likely that you'll get infected with Sasser within ten minutes of connecting to the internet. On more permissive networks, like a university's, I've heard that (and seen) this happen in less than a minute.

      There's some truth to that sentiment.

    6. Re:sensationalist ? by pavon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, he's right. I was putting together a new computers for brother just before christmas. Here is what I did:
      1) Installed windows 2000 from the CD, not connected to the internet.
      2) Powered down the computer and plugged into cable modem, via ethernet.
      3) Powered on computer and immediately ran Windows Update.

      Before I could even select which updates to install, I had a windows messaging box (the Windows functionality, not MSN messager) pop up. Anyway, I finished installing all the updates, and then proceded to install a virus checker and spyware removal programs, and the virus checker indeed did find stuff (I forget what).

      So within 30 seconds of connecting the computer to the internet, a virus had already exploited a flaw in Windows, and probably had already infected the system. But I had definately been infected within 30 minutes of connecting to the internet, because it took less time than that to install the updates and virus checker.

    7. Re:sensationalist ? by ZorinLynx · · Score: 2

      I've always wondered why Windows systems ship with any open ports at all.

      That's one of the things that impressed me about MacOS X; I nmapped a machine after a fresh install and ZERO ports were open. You have to specifically enable any services you want.

      Why can't MS do this? It's really not that hard!

      -Z

    8. Re:sensationalist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - a stock OEM install of Win2k or XP, the infection could happen as soon as the next reboot.

      Or while you're downloading SP1 to fix all that crap.

      People have to be protected behind a firewall - perferably Smoothwall :)

      nuff said.

    9. Re:sensationalist ? by Blastrogath · · Score: 1

      Sensationalist? I wish. While I was taking a class on windows 2000 a few years ago we where setting up a network of windows 2000 servers and about half had viruses before we could finish windows update.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    10. Re:sensationalist ? by jejones · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a link, but...recent articles on /. and elsewhere assert that a Windows XP box as it typically comes from the store will be 0wn3d by the time the online registration is finished, and give links to a site with instructions of the form

      1. Boot up, and tell it you'll register later.
      2. Turn off .
      3. _Then_ register.

      (If someone does have a link, please follow up; I'd like to refer Windows-running friends to it (along with offering them a Knoppix CD...)

    11. Re:sensationalist ? by guiscard · · Score: 1


      My last xp install got infected within 20 seconds of being connected, I forgot to disable Windows Messenger.

    12. Re:sensationalist ? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Then you obviously haven't been paying attention to recent events. Look up the Sasser virus/worm.

      On the other side though, a patch has been avaliable via Windowsupdate since before the worm struck, so it's really a user's fault if they end up getting infected...

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    13. Re:sensationalist ? by nuggetman · · Score: 1

      Erm... you do know that windows messenger is just someones box going "net send" to a range of IPs, right?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    14. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Same here. Brand new, out of the box XP machines. I installed the DSL software and BAM, ten minutes in, Blaster virus got me. At first I nuked the disk and tried again. Same thing. This is when I realized that the ISP was infected! They didn't realize it for over a week. Telling tech "support" was no help. They simply didn't believe it. Well, a few days later the whole ISP went down for three days! After that, I realized that I didn't need their software to run the modem. I just used the windows drivers.
      Meanwhile, back to IRC's. If it's as wild as they say it is, GOOD! Anything, and I mean ANYTHING that can bring us one step closer to anonymous, untracable internet usage is great. I like anything that might possibly force us to RESOLVE our problems, instead of making stupid work arounds and unenforcable laws.

      --
      What?
    15. Re:sensationalist ? by nuser · · Score: 1

      In the interests of balance, and consequent loss of karma, I'd like to point out that a RedHat box was rooted within about 15 minutes of being hooked up. I think it was someone at the honeypot project that reported it.

    16. Re:sensationalist ? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much how xp sp2 works. The firewall is on and blocking the ports (it may be "almost all". I don't know think it blocks port 80 by default). If an app tries to access a port, it tells you, and you can decide whether to let it.

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    17. Re:sensationalist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why you chill behind a router and don't DMZ the box you're playing with.

      -TD

    18. Re:sensationalist ? by oddfox · · Score: 1

      Keep a copy of ZoneAlarm or some other free firewall program to put onto any Windows 2000 installation.

      When I do Windows XP installations, I never enable internet connections by default, and after the first boot is done, it's a simple task to enable the Windows XP firewall, get the device an IP, and then run Windows Update.

      The process hasn't failed me quite yet.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    19. Re:sensationalist ? by oddfox · · Score: 1

      By the way, I meant to keep that firewall proggie on a CD-R/CD-RW disc, hehe. If you use a CD-R, of course, it would probably be a good idea to put some other useful proggies you install before anything else. :)

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    20. Re:sensationalist ? by notsoclever · · Score: 1
      • blaster
      • sircam
      • nimda
      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    21. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before I could even select which updates to install, I had a windows messaging box (the Windows functionality, not MSN messager) pop up. Anyway, I finished installing all the updates, and then proceded to install a virus checker and spyware removal programs, and the virus checker indeed did find stuff (I forget what).

      This has squat to do with worms and viruses. Windows 2K+ ships with windows messanger service set to start up automatically. Messenger service is designed for sysadmins to send message to the network. This has been exploited by spammers to sent out message box popups to people who haven't:
      1. disabled the service
      or
      2. Installed a firewall.

      You should have installed a firewall *before* you connected to the web.

      --
      meh
    22. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      This is when I realized that the ISP was infected!

      And how exactly did you reach that conclusion? What does this have to do with the ISP? It is about the tens of thousands of clueless users who have been infected by Blaster, not about the ISP. And for that matter, you should have installed a firewall before you thought about connecting to the web.

      Meanwhile, back to IRC's. If it's as wild as they say it is, GOOD! Anything, and I mean ANYTHING that can bring us one step closer to anonymous, untracable internet usage is great. I like anything that might possibly force us to RESOLVE our problems, instead of making stupid work arounds and unenforcable laws.

      Yah go anarchy. Bring on Versign to take over the web! Unregulated corporate dominance rocks! I want to give up my rights to RIAA! I think the web will solve all the problems of the world.

      --
      meh
    23. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Firewall was on.(the only change I made before I hooked up as a matter of fact.) I had to use XP's until I could download a better one. It could have been the DSL install disk. That would've been weird. The fact that the service went down for three days was a pretty good hint. Right now, they're having trouble with their DNS server. It won't resolve until I "hammer" on it a few times. The whole town is having the same problem with them. They're the only game in town, so we're stuck.

      Bring on Versign to take over the web! Unregulated corporate dominance rocks! I want to give up my rights to RIAA! I think the web will solve all the problems of the world.

      Huh???

      --
      What?
    24. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Firewall was on.(the only change I made before I hooked up as a matter of fact.) I had to use XP's until I could download a better one.

      Interestingly the XP firewall at the moment has a vulnerability that leaves you unprotected for a short time (I read up to 7 seconds) on bootup. This is only going to be fixed with sp2. The point is, you should burn a CD of a decent firewall (the XP firewall also doesn't block outgoing, only incoming), and install that before you connect to the web.

      The fact that the service went down for three days was a pretty good hint

      Nup. That was a pretty good hint that their network is overloaded. That may be due to the fact that they have a lot of infecte blaster boxes on the network, but that does not mean that ISP themselves was infected.

      Huh???

      My point is that without some regulation, that is what will happen.

      --
      meh
    25. Re:sensationalist ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Installed windows 2000 from the CD, not connected to the internet.
      2) Powered down the computer and plugged into cable modem, via ethernet.
      3) Powered on computer and immediately ran Windows Update.


      That's what you get for being a fscking idiot and not buying a $30 broadband router/firewall. Those boxes have been around for 5+ years, cost *way* less then a bench fee at the local repair shop and are a no-brainer for anyone who fancies themselve "techy".

    26. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      At the time, I thought I could be reasonably safe. I never heard of anyone getting infected so quickly. Live n learn. I did notice that if I didn't use their install disk, there was no problem. The install required a connection to complete, and it was connected for about 5 minutes.

      My point is that without some regulation, that is what will happen.

      That's what's happening now. Without regulation, there would be nobody to protect them either. A true free for all that only technological solutions could fix. As someone who still works with pen and paper for important stuff (my built-in calculator still works), it would be fun to watch.

      --
      What?
    27. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      That's what's happening now. Without regulation, there would be nobody to protect them either.

      Survival of the fitest. Might is right. Well, right now they are the strongest. For one thing Verisign runs the top 13 DNS servers. The backbone of the internet (fibre links etc) are owned and run by corporations. I think you forget who needs the protection.

      A true free for all that only technological solutions could fix.

      Ahh geek utopia. Have you noticed that there isn't a techinal solution to Spam? Or to hunger in the third world (joke)? Technical solutions do not solve all problems. In general problem on the net often have solutions that are part techical, part legislative and part social. I think you need to place less faith in technology to provide solutions to problems.

      Even if we moved to a dog eat dog, the end result would be a techincal elite controlling the net and using/abusing for their own purposes. Our corporate overlords would be replaced by techincal ones. As someone who codes for a living, puts together their own PCs (and for others) and runs a network of 8 pcs at home, in other words someone who would benefit from government by technologists, say that this is a bad idea.

      --
      meh
    28. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Maybe our part of the world isn't dog eat dog, but, thanks to our corporate overlords (formerly religious overlords...formerly anybody with a big stick) a lot of it still is. However, in reality, I'll accept that we are not evolved enough to live in a world of "rules without rulers" yet. Unfortunately, "might makes right" is still the rule of the day. Just ask anyone who says "no thanks" when America offers its "help". The technology I would like to see would be something that could protect an individual from any other individual or group.

      --
      What?
    29. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      However, in reality, I'll accept that we are not evolved enough to live in a world of "rules without rulers" yet.

      We never will evolve enough. Faith in evolution as a means to improve the human race is as flawed as faith in technology. Take a look at the last century, our high point in evolution.

      Let's face some facts. Technology will not solve all the world's problems. Science will not solve the world's problems. Our capacity to change ourselves is small. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

      --
      meh
    30. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, evolution of any significance would take hundreds of thousands, if not millions of years.

      Our capacity to change ourselves is small. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try.

      I couldn't possibly agree more. However, never say never. If we survive long enough, we will evolve enough, and more! :-)

      Most of the worlds problems are man made. If man can make all these problems, surely we can stop. The fact that it requires a conscious effort and a whole lot of energy to make these problems should make it easy to simply stop it. I know...ain't gonna happen. na-ga-da...wouldn't be prudent.

      --
      What?
    31. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      If we survive long enough, we will evolve enough, and more! :-)

      That assumes we will evolve morally, intelectually and physically. I would say there is some support for the last two, I don't see any support for the first one though.

      Most of the worlds problems are man made. If man can make all these problems, surely we can stop.

      That is a big assumption to make. You are assuming we can change ourselves. This assumption is made up of two others.
      1. The assumption I pointed out earlier that we will evolve.
      2. That we can control that evolution.

      I'm not sure that either of those assumptions are valid.

      --
      meh
    32. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Our history on this planet is extremely short. Let's not underestimate ourselves.(or overestimate) I tend to believe that there is a higher percentage of moral people now than there was, say, just 100 years ago. They're just not running the show. Maybe the problem comes up when good people have to do bad things to prevail or even to survive. I know that we CAN change ourselves. It's desire part that's hard to produce. The time scales involved are so beyond our imaginations that trying to prove these assumptions will be very difficult.

      --
      What?
    33. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      . Let's not underestimate ourselves.(or overestimate) I tend to believe that there is a higher percentage of moral people now than there was, say, just 100 years ago.

      This is hard to prove one way or the other. I'm inclined to believe the reverse, but that is because I am a pessimist. That doesn't make either of us right. However I think that the evidence of the last century weighs pretty heavily in my favour. I'm not if you read much history, but I'd say that the last century was the worst in the history of humanity morally speaking. I don't see any signs of that improving.

      Maybe the problem comes up when good people have to do bad things to prevail or even to survive.

      Does that not disquilify them being good? Surely a good person would prefer to sacrifice themselves than harm others to survive? Can all actions justified on the basis of survival?

      I know that we CAN change ourselves. It's desire part that's hard to produce.

      I see both as a problem. How is that you "know" we can change? I can explain why I know we aren't going to change, but I don't think you will like or accept my explanation.

      --
      meh
    34. Re:sensationalist ? by efishta · · Score: 1

      Windows Messenger doesn't allow any viruses or spyware in. It's simply a built in messaging utility for network use, and also works accross the internet that in this case has been exploited for advertisements. Go to your cmd prompt, type "net send x.x.x.x "message" " (where x.x.x.x is the ip number and "message" is the message you want to send, and it will send that message to whatever computer has that IP address (assuming they have Messenger service enabled.

    35. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      We'll probably never know who's right or if there even is a "right" in cosmic terms anyway. While the last hundred years were pretty horrible, I think if we go back a thousand years or so we might conclude that the Europeans (most notably the Vikings and the Christians) were really a savage bunch. Then there's Ghengis Kahn, etc. But in relation to the whole planet, there most likely hasn't been any real change. The savagery just moved off shore (from Europe and the U.S. anyway)

      Does that not disquilify them being good?

      You're extremely right on with that. It could also lead me to conclude that you are right about humans not getting better over time. All the good people would sacrifice themselves, leaving only the bastards. Gandhi and his followers should be and probably are considered truly good people. There was also a large group of natives on a Carribean island that, when facing the conquistadors, chose mass suicide over slavery. In truth, that's the way it should be done. Killing another person truly bad, no matter what. In reality, we are survival whores that will do anything to stay alive. I'm not how I would act when facing a situation like this, but I know I should just let it go and not try to cling to life.

      I can explain why I know we aren't going to change, but I don't think you will like or accept my explanation.

      Don't hold out on me, man! My liking or accepting it is irrelevent.

      I'm really holding out for some evidence that physical existance is not entirely evil and that death is not so absolute as to make life entirely meaningless.

      Could I be any more off-topic on this thread? We're supposed to be talking IRC and the NYT. I don't care. I'm having fun. Thanks.

      --
      What?
    36. Re:sensationalist ? by dcam · · Score: 1

      Sorry to go quiet for a while, it was a busy weekend and I was sick on Monday.

      While the last hundred years were pretty horrible, I think if we go back a thousand years or so we might conclude that the Europeans (most notably the Vikings and the Christians) were really a savage bunch. Then there's Ghengis Kahn, etc. But in relation to the whole planet, there most likely hasn't been any real change. The savagery just moved off shore (from Europe and the U.S. anyway)

      It is very difficult to make generalisations on the period of Ghengis Khan and the like, because we don't know a whole lot about them. I think you are right though.

      There was also a large group of natives on a Carribean island that, when facing the conquistadors, chose mass suicide over slavery. In truth, that's the way it should be done.

      I'm not sure I totally agree with that, but I think that depends on your view of suicide. I think a better example would be a person who chose to starve rather than the steal food frrom someone else (which would have resulted in them starving).

      Killing another person truly bad, no matter what. In reality, we are survival whores that will do anything to stay alive. I'm not how I would act when facing a situation like this, but I know I should just let it go and not try to cling to life.

      You make a very interesting point. I think you have are right there. I remember reading some personal reflections on people going to war. Before they started fighting, some were mentally resigned to die, however once there was the chance of dying they were frightened of dying. It is like there is a real hunger and drive to survive. Why didn't prisoners in concentration camps just give up? They can't have had much hope of survival, and yet they did not (well not all) give in.

      Don't hold out on me, man! My liking or accepting it is irrelevent.

      My reason for believing this is because I am a Christian. I believe that humans were created perfect, but as a result of them doing what God told them not them to do, every part of the world we live in and ourselves has become damaged. As I said I'm not sure that you will agree with that. But what is interesting to me, is that what I believe is confirmed by the world I see around me. The word that springs to mind for me is flawed: the world we live in shows what it was created to be, but it is also damaged irrevocably. A flawed diamond. As people we show that flawed nature and we are broken to such and extent that we cann't fix ourselves. We need outside help.

      I'm really holding out for some evidence that physical existance is not entirely evil and that death is not so absolute as to make life entirely meaningless.

      Well from my perspecive that is a littla easier to answer. If you take what I said above, then physical life is not absolutely evil. Neither is death absolute and life is not a meaningless struggle that we cannot win, because we cannot change ourselves. God has interevened by sending Jesus so save us (and indeed the world) from this cycle.

      I'm not sure where you stand on all this, I'd hazard a guess that my answer might surprise/disappoint you. That said, I have greatly enjoyed chatting, it has been an interesting and enlighening experience.

      I'm not sure if you are interested in looking into this any further. If you are, can I suggest having a go at reading Ecclesiates, one of the books of the bible. The reason I suggest Ecclesiates is that it really charts one man's quest for meaning in life. It isn't what most people would consider Christian, indeed there was some debate on whether it should be part of the bible at all. From any perspective it is an interesting read.

      "What does man gain from all his labor
      at which he toils under the sun?
      Generations come and generations go,
      but the earth remains forever."

      Link

      --
      meh
    37. Re:sensationalist ? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Almost missed your post entirely. Thanks for the reply. Iwasn't disappointed at all.

      I believe that humans were created perfect...

      I am under the impression it's just the opposite. That people are born "savage" or "animal" and have to learn to act human. That's one of the reasons I thought that was why people weren't baptised until they were adults, because in order to get to heaven you had to know and believe in God. Just my take on it. I cannot argue with the rest of your post. We seem to be in agreement for the most part. Besides, this is probably not the place to argue over details. Maybe God created us so that he had someone to "know" and believe in him. He may have been (and from the looks of things, still is) lonely. Not to disparage, but I need to let you know that I'm not a believer, but sometimes I make a feeble effort to understand the beliefs of others. With all the different religions out there, I'm not the one to decide which one is more valid than the other. Or if any of them are valid. It's one of the reasons I don't like the way outsiders have such disdain for the Muslims, and I usually get slammed over it. Especially now under the current circumstances.

      --
      What?
  98. Marketing to sway public opinion by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like yet another attempt to steer the 'general public' into lumping people together.

    "Look at this, only bad people use IRC... Perhaps there should be something done about this"

    Much as they are doing with P2P users, or even OSS people...

    Before you laugh, look at the use of the term 'hacker' and how the media perversed it into a bad word... The 'media' has great power over the mindless general public.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Marketing to sway public opinion by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Who made hacker into a good word?

      A word is defined by how it is most commonly used. Nobody can arbitrate a word's meaning. I don't mind using "hacker"/"hack" verb for what many call "crackers"/"crack", so I use "hack" (the noun), "break into" unless it's technically interesting in which case it's a "hack" for a crack, and "good hacker" or some such.

  99. Ooh, they have internet on computers now! by HDlife · · Score: 1

    -- Homer Simpson, "The Internet King"

  100. Re:Lol by jantheman · · Score: 2, Funny

    pfft - it's chan & op :P

    --
    -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
  101. Re:Darn! Now average joe will use it and ruin it by Golgafrinchan · · Score: 1

    I'm already working on rigging up the old 300 baud modem.

    Of course, when the New York Times finds out about the innate evilness of the 300 baud modem, where will we go next?

    --
    My userid is prime!
  102. Dimly-lit Back-alley... by SkimTony · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who started to use IRC a lot to acquire episodes of her favorite TV show(s) a few years ago, and she seemed confused/concerned when I described IRC as the "dimly-lit back-alley of the internet." I explained that IRC used to be where I went to chat with friends online, before all of these "Instant Messenger" clients became popular, but that now it seems to me that mostly what goes on there is trading of pirated software and TV episodes or movies.

    In the end, she reluctantly agreed that my description was "somewhat accurate." I have nothing against IRC, but it is entertaining to see people who are unfamiliar with the landscape of the internet discover new places.

  103. Pleasant gun to your head by Zareste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed concentration camp.

    Fixt.

    --
    I am NOT a number! I am a - oh wait, I'm number 761710. Look! 761710!
  104. Google Groups by duncangough · · Score: 1

    Just wait till they make the link from IRC to newsgroups, then newsgroups to Deja News, then Deja News to Google Groups... evil, evil, evil?

  105. BZZT by XMyth · · Score: 0

    Newb....and it shows....=P

  106. But we benefit by tacokill · · Score: 1

    I like articles like this because it scares the average Joe into NOT using whatever technology the article is about.

    The surest way to kill the "elite" scene is to start adding average Joes. All of a sudden, those idiots are telling their bosses, neighbors, and whoever else will listen all about the free stuff they are getting on this "new" medium.

  107. Obviously ... by egrubs · · Score: 0, Troll

    you've never been to Texas.

  108. Soul-Sucking Registration by Acemakr · · Score: 1

    Tired of that free soul-sucking required registration? Check out http://www.bugmenot.com - they have circumvented required registrations by developing spoofed user IDs and passwords. As a matter of fact, the example they use on the home page.... http://www.nytimes.com ! Go figure

    --
    Acemakr
    1. Re:Soul-Sucking Registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I find that Fark.com users tend to sign up for these sites with generic names: in this case, it was farker/farker.

  109. Ah finally they get to the bottom of the problem by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. Windows has holes that can allow a hacker to install almost anything on a computer that lacks a protective program or device called a firewall. Users' vulnerability can be compounded if they have not installed the latest patches from Microsoft."

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  110. Rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first rule of USENET: DON'T talk about USENET!

    The second rule of USENET: DON'T talk about USENET!

  111. Re:Darn! Now average joe will use it and ruin it by temerity · · Score: 1

    Good thing I can run my C64 emulator on my PocketPC to connect to it!

  112. They don't by poptones · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the US the "complete" newsgroup providers I know of have begun either denying posting access to certain groups, or just filtering out binary content altogether. Easynews especially seems to have been hit hard since that virus made its debut from one of their accounts. Every now and then you see a complaint from someone in the support forum because godzilla deleted binary content - their response is almost always "get over it, things have changed." That old paradigm about carriers of content not being responsible for the actual content seems to have gone out the window - lots of "police," self appointed and otherwise, sending in complaints. Once the complaint is made, the carriers have no choice but to delete it.

    I use easynews and regularly READ (important note there) several of the "shady" groups. There's plenty of music and movies and stuff, but the kiddie fans and site crackers have ALL gone underground. LOTS of groups now flooded with PGP posts and encrypted RARs, locked away from everyone but the cliques that communicate elsewhere and use the groups as massive file stores. All that's left in the clear are stories about arrests and rumors of arrests - those folks are all running scared and getting busted even in places like Finland and Singapore. Even many of the bigger MP3 posters have left the building.

    I do believe usenet is about to "grow up" the way the web did. Except newsgroups are useless to businesses for anything except support forums, so how this is going to affect things in the future remains to be seen.

    Even most of the stuff in the DVD rip groups is intentionally mislabelled and you often hear about folks having their accounts cancelled due to their posts in the music and video groups. The only reason none of this affects me is because I don't post ripped movies or pop music (or illegal shit) - all my trading is done in the "international" and techno music groups where artists are more independant and copyright coverage a bit murkier.

    That said, I think these folks must be late to the party. I'm sure there are plenty of newbs on IRC doing illegal shit, but nobody with more than half a brain would be doing it in the open on IRC where your IP can be grabbed in realtime. I'd say the NYT is, as usual, arriving VERY late to this party.

    1. Re:They don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like everyone I also had my IRC pirating days. I've moved on, but I have fond memories to share. No one was concerned with their ip being associated with warez. Everying was out in the open. Some people even used the most popular networks to do the deed while others spread to lesser known ones to avoid the heat. Taking a quick epeek, not much seems to have changed. The smart operators will mask their ip with a vhost but all the leechers dont care. I'd been leeching and an op for years with out any precautions and i never got in trouble. I knew how easy it was for them to find me but they didnt even try.

    2. Re:They don't by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "I do believe usenet is about to "grow up" the way the web did."

      Yup...and I must say, it is kinda sad. Saw and read the wildest stuff on USENET and IRC...its too bad, was nice to have totally unbridled 'free speach' and 'free expression' there for awhile...

      Wonder why someone hasn't come up with a totally anonymouse IRC application/protocol?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:They don't by dadeSF · · Score: 1
      "but nobody with more than half a brain would be doing it in the open on IRC where your IP can be grabbed in realtime"
      anyone could use an anonymous proxy to cover the IP. the most interesting stuff I've heard about IRC is, hackers hijack PCs and set bots on those PC to connect to a particular chanel in some IRC network. Then operator only needs to execute "!attack xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and all those zombie machines start the DOS attack.
    4. Re:They don't by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Wonder why someone hasn't come up with a totally anonymouse IRC application/protocol?

      Good question. But I'm not sure if it's possible as long as we are tied to a wire for access. I'm waiting for the day when we can "island hop" neuron style over wireless to make tracking impossible, or at least not worth the effort.

      anonymouse

      Is that Mickey's evil twin? :-)

      --
      What?
    5. Re:They don't by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      the most interesting stuff I've heard about IRC is, hackers hijack PCs and set bots on those PC to connect to a particular chanel in some IRC network. Then operator only needs to execute "!attack xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" and all those zombie machines start the DOS attack.

      You mean exactly like is described in the article we're supposed to be discussing?
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    6. Re:They don't by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      I heard about this before the article - to be technical, a DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attack.

      Basically, there was a big article about a techie whose company got DDoSed, and he then went on a mish to find out who did it and how. Very interesting read - dissecting the worm, an' all.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    7. Re:They don't by Euan+Buchanan · · Score: 1
      I do believe usenet is about to "grow up" the way the web did. Except newsgroups are useless to businesses for anything except support forums, so how this is going to affect things in the future remains to be seen.
      One of the biggest problems in business is the use of email. People get brought on board a project where all the communication has been done by email. If the project members used a collaborative medium such as Usenet to communicate, new parties to the project have full access to the history of what's gone before.
    8. Re:They don't by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Why should unbridled 'free speach' and 'free expression' be tied to kiddie pron and a warze???
      I use usenet and irc all the time. usenet still has valuable information on programing and the sciences. Irc I use to chat with friends of mine. They are not be definiton evil. Just as the printing press can be used to create copies of the Bible, text books, and works of art. it can also be used to print Penthouse, Klan newsletters, and kiddie pron. In a free country we have to live with the fact that some people would find books like the Hobbit or the Bible evil yet would find Penthouse or a Klan newsletter great. Kiddie porn is differnt. Every reasonable country has outlawed it. In some countries think the age should be 16 in the US it is 18 but they still out law it.
      The fact is kiddie porn is the abuse of children and is in no way positive. Warez is taking away the right of an author to decide how his work can be distributed. It is breaking the same law as violating the GPL. You can make the argument that abandonware is not hurting anyone but I am talking about warez(sic). If you feel free to violate a license you do not like why get out raged when SCO does the same thing to GPL.
      Yes the police and the media really should not have had such a screaming field day over this and no the ISP computers should have been taken but to prase porn and warez as shinning examples of "Free Speech" is just sick.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  113. heh by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We're all doomed if they discover bash.org :)

    --
    Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    1. Re:heh by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      hm maybe I should read comments *before* posting

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  114. Mos Eisley by bfsmith9 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What a miserable article. It makes me sick. "Hackers gone wild." (It's always hackers, right? It's never, ever crackers, or phreaks, or software/music pirates, or whatever. Hackers, yes. Drill it home. Though the author does seem to know about other terms - like "warez", which the article carefully defines.) Love the SW reference. Can you picture righteous Obi Wan Ashcroft? "IRC... you will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy." A breeding ground for terrorists. OK, all set. Pack it up - we're done. Why read any more? We'll just have to outlaw this, along with guns, 747's, non-GPS cellphones, non-M$ systems, boxcutters, etc.

    "It is still possible, though sometimes a bit difficult, to find mature technical discussions..." Oh, come on! Which is it? Is it careening toward almost impossible, or do you just not know how to use IRC or what to look for? Then they have Bill Beer^h^h^h^h Bierman from U. of Hawaii who talks about how the "kids" use it to "go nuts." Girls Gone Wild - IRC!! "...seem to be ...dedicated to every sexual fetish!" Love this article! It's got everything! Violence, fear, sex, depravity. You have to admit - this kind of thing will sell newspapers.

  115. NYTimes, the 1990s want their news back by DoorFrame · · Score: 0

    C'mon New York Times, you're usually not too behind the curve on technology stories. IRC being a wild west? Yeah, I guess, but it hasn't really changed much in the last 6 years. It's always been a wild west environment, and hopefully it always will be. The Internet needs some unpleasantness. The Internet needs script kiddies. Sure, they're a hassle and they occasionally do something disasterously stupid, but it's part of the fun of the internet. It's amazing that something as important and complicated as this all-powerful international communication has become is still legitimately threatened by some 14 year old in his bedroom. I know it seems rather threatening, but I hope it stays that way... I like the idea of the little guy still having an impact now and then. I doesn't happen with Television, it doesn't happen with Radio, it doesn't happen with Film... it's only online that there's even a chance.

    God bless IRC.

  116. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by jht · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, I'm making a living right now because of that, so in a way I'm glad it's actually true. If you plug a Windows box directly into a high-speed Internet connection without updating everything first, the probability that you will be ownz0r3d rapidly approaches 1.

    If no firewall/NAT router is present, then it's absolutely inevitable that you'll get nailed on a Windows box. If the Windows box is pre-configured with a software firewall that's enabled, and fully updated, your odds of survival are good.

    I spent much of yesterday cleaning up things for a single client who had bought a new Dell a few months ago and put it directly on a SDSL connection. It was literally riddled with nasty stuff. She had called me when it started the Sasser-driven shutdown process - until that happened she had written off the computer's misbehavior as normal.

    And I have a lot of users in similar situations. Basically, most computer users buy it and expect it to work. They don't know about or care about security, and frankly shouldn't have to.

    But I can't complain, because Windows helps put food on my table. When they finally get it right, it'll be time for a new career!

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  117. grrrrrrr! by TheHawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    *snarls and kicks maztec in the 'nads*

    In my 8+ years on IRC, I've helped countless users with PC problems, helped hunt down a script kiddie that was beating on a IRC network (that will go unnamed), founded a dozen or so channels that have gone and done quite well for themselves after naming a successor to (this is true!), I either single-handedly or helped saved 3 fellow users from killing themselves due to personal or financial problems.

    You go download a IRC client, sign onto ANY IRC network, hang around for a month on a channel, then you tell ME that IRC is evil.

    With groups or people, there will always be evil, but the balance of good always seems to outweigh evil in certain aspects.

    IRC has simply unleashed the power of international relations upon each other. So we are unwittlingly amabassadors for our own state or country.
    So make the best of it folks, the author and the poster needs to get on IRC and experience it first-hand for a year, THEN make his or her report.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:grrrrrrr! by ReyTFox · · Score: 1

      Entirely true. In about two years of IRC I've met people from pretty much every spot of the world, Tasmania, New Zealand, South Africa, Korea etc., most European countries, and prolly all 50 US states too now, though I haven't kept track.

      A lot does depend on the channels you visit. Many are effectively dead; everyone just PMs each other. Others are full of angst and power disputes. You can rest assured, though, that the channel you want is out there somewhere.

    2. Re:grrrrrrr! by Alcemenes · · Score: 1

      I've been using IRC for around 8+ years myself and although I don't have a list of accolades such as this I have met a lot of great people through IRC as well as plenty of idiots. It if were not for IRC I would not have learned about the recent passing of a good friend of mine. It seems that on the larger networks the "evil" tends to stay separated from the "good" with the occasional nuisance popping up from time to time. Smaller networks and especially those trying to establish themselves seem to have the most problems. I can think of two smaller networks that disappeared into the cyber sunset due to DoS attacks, mostly the result of personal differences between a couple script kiddies and overzealous opers. I've found IRC to be more like a favorite pub where you and your friends meet. I agree, the author needs to spend at least a year on IRC to really get a handle on what it is. It isn't the cess pool that most of usenet has become.

    3. Re:grrrrrrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author of the article went looking for "evil" on [insert medium here], and he found it. Big surprise.

    4. Re:grrrrrrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *snarls and kicks maztec in the 'nads*
      lol fag
  118. About time by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    If Outlook Express came with an IRC client this would have happened a long time ago.

  119. He's Right but he's generalizing by Grimster · · Score: 1

    Yes IRC is a hotbed of illegal activities, it's where I have always gone to get my goods, from the days of helping to start #cablemp3z on dal.net (I hear dal.net doesn't allow any file channels anymore, last time I was on there was pre-2K) with some friends way back when to full dvd rips now. The thing that seperates irc from p2p is (in my case) I usually know the people I am dealing with, often to the point of having phone numbers for them or even having crashed on their couch at some point. So I know when they say "hey I got " it really is and not some fake file. No RIAA spies writing down ip addresses, because anyone who enters our little world that we don't know gets booted before they can say !list. We chat and hang out and if someone gets something cool they share it with the rest.

    It isn't the wild west, it's utopia.

    That said, irc is like any other tool, I can choose to hit you in the head with my hammer, or I can build you a house, the fact that the hammer can be used to smash your brains in doesn't make it evil.

    I also have a private irc server I use for customer support and my techs all stay in a private channel so when we're dealing with tech issues we have a whole group ready to help us solve problems, makes my helpdesk a lot more efficient when any of my techs can ask me a question and get an answer the next time I bring irc to the foreground rather than wait on an email, plus it's a social thing as well as a release mechanism, customer acting a fool? Just bitch in the channel, let it all out and then answer them.

    --
    --- www.f-theocean.com
  120. We? are you sure? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


    If you are calling it leetspeak you are already demonstrating your non-involvment in the genesis of |<405 73>

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:We? are you sure? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > you are already demonstrating your non-involvment in the genesis of |

      What the heck is Kaos te>?

    2. Re:We? are you sure? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      hehe I escaped the first < but forgot the next one

      |<405 73><7

      oh well, back to the ANSI

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  121. Why IRC should be censored by Twinky · · Score: 1
    There is a little bit of truth in the claim that a lot of evil things happen in IRC. Not that it is specifically limited to IRC, it can be found in many corners of the Internet (I personally stopped using the usenet when people advocated against the removal of spam, it being against free speech and all). There is one big reason that supports the easy availability of spam, free Britney Spears Songs, pirated Hollywood Blockbusters, sexual harassments anf general idiocy: Lack of consequence.

    If I behave rude on a IRC Channel, the worst that can happen is me being kicked or banned from the server. It's trivial to reenter with a new identity. Since annoying people do not have to face any consequences of their actions, they have no reason to behave more civilised. And that is why Chats are full of idiots.

    A civilised system should have some of the following properties:

    • A reasonably high entry barrier, there should be some work involved in being able to connect to the system. Probably showing some authentication (like a GPG key)
    • Motivation to behave reasonably. For instance, new users might just be allowed to post to specially reservered Areas. Once they proofed worthy, they gradually get more rights.
    • Penalties for misbehaviour. There should be a dependable way to block misbehaving people for a limited time from the service. People being blocked must have the right to defend themselve.
    I think this way we could end up with a much more cultured Internet society. A place where it is fun to interact with people.
    1. Re:Why IRC should be censored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to see you try to prove "Lack of consequence". Nothing but a fallacy. You need to learn how to argue.

    2. Re:Why IRC should be censored by demon · · Score: 1

      And who's going to stop someone from setting up their own IRC server, and setting their own rules about how things are run? I'll save you time and answer the question for you - nobody, that's who.

      It's not like there's some imaginary body that has 100% total control of everything that happens everywhere, every second on every IRC channel. Other than on networks like Freenode, where the guy who runs the network is a control freak, it's mostly a loose affiliation of people running IRC servers who decide to network them together, and that's about all there is to say on the subject.

      It's like civilization in the "real world" - people generally agree that there are certain good rules to live by. Trying to force everyone to operate by your rules, or else, is just probably going to encourage them to go do what they want on their own, whether you like it or not.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  122. IRC #nytimes by sameerdesai · · Score: 1

    *Sameer joins #nytimes Welcome Sameer to the "new" world of IRC" Duh! * nytimesOp set mode +o Sameer See now you have @ sign in front of you just like me Duh! I think we are all evil /chanserv mkick #nytimes You have been owned!!! ;-D

  123. PFFT! by chrome · · Score: 1

    Those of us who have been on IRC since the good-old-days have known for YEARS that IRC is evil.

  124. +5 Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  125. Where did they dig up that old FOSSIL?!?!?!?!?!? by xystren · · Score: 2, Funny

    To quote our most favorate scoundral, and smuggler....

    Where did you dig up that old FOSSIL?!?!?!?!?!?!

    Where in the galaxy, (far, far away obiously) did this writer come up with this information? The WEB a "Plesent and well policed suburb"?!@?!?!?!?!? Has this SETH SCHIESEL even been on the internet? What about popups? What about Adware? What about that damn "comet cursor"

    Where the heck has this SETH SCHIESEL been?

    I can see it now... An Interview with SETH SCHIESEL by Xystren

    Xystren : "We would like to welcome SS, foremost NY Times expert on the internet. Welcome SS"

    ss : "Thank you, it's a pleasure being here, and more importantly, to provide information about the internet. There are many bad areas in the internet, just like there are bad neighbourhoods in larger citys"

    Xystren : "Oh? Is that so? You sound surprised that the internet can be a dangerous place?"

    ss : "Well of course, it's not like a policed suburb, we are talking a bad, industral area type thing, you know, where gangs, drugs, and the underground types hang out, ready to mug or hijack you at the earliest opportunity"

    Xystren : "Where exactly have you been going to find these nice "suburbs" as you have put it.

    ss : "Well, at my work computer (I don't have the internet at home, you see), I go on the internet and search for things. It's really quite a wonderfull tool to tell the truth. All the NY times stories and such. It's really a wonderfull and safe and informative place."

    Xystren : "so your saying that you've only gone onto the internet, via the NY Times article search?"

    ss : "Exactly!"

    Xystren : [trying to contain laughter] "Are you aware that would be condsidered an "inTRAnet" and not the "inTERnet??"

    ss : "Uhh, well, they sound the same, aren't they the same thing?"

    Xystren : No, they aren't the same things. [turning head shouting] "John, I thought you screened these people, Where did you dig up that old FOSSIL?!?!?!?!?!?! SS doesn't know jack about the internet.[Sorry Xyst, we had time we needed to fill]

    SS : Old Fossil? what does that mean?

    Xystren : "Why don't you go look it up on google, yahoo, or lycos??"

    SS : "What are those?"

    Xystren : "What are those!?!?!?!???? What do you mean what are those? They are some of the Internet's most common and popular search engines! Are you even the least bit familar about the internet at all? Have you heard of popups? have you heard about malware? infact, do you even know what browser is???

    ss : "Well uhhh, no...."

    Xystren : "Where did you even get your information for you research??"

    ss : "well, uhh, ummm..."

    Xystren : "I can tell, you got it from /. didn't you? ADMIT IT! You did didn't you?

    ss : [sheepishly replies] uhh, yeah...

    Xystren : "So there you have it, another non-NERD trying to use "News for Nerd - The stuff that matters". This is the real danger of the internet people, BEWARE!


    What more can I say???

    ss : "I still don't get this 'old fossil'"

    Xystren : "it's ok ss, your not a nerd, your not ment to get it"

    ---
    if you can't dazzel them with dexterity, baffle them with bu))$h!t

  126. The article is awesome! by arhar · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thinks NYT just done IRC a great service by printing such a great advertisement for IRC? Watch how those 500,000 people soon turn into *pinkie to lip* BILLIONS of users!

  127. no, they really are groping for a clue! by Erris · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You must have missed this passage:

    In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. Windows has holes that can allow a hacker to install almost anything on a computer that lacks a protective program or device called a firewall. Users' vulnerability can be compounded if they have not installed the latest patches from Microsoft.

    Cut SETH SCHIESEL some slack. The press is still groping with Internet issues. A few years back, a "computer expert" at most papers was someone who knew how to fix the boss's M$ desktop.

    Many things said were encouraging.

    • He understands that users can run "servers"
    • He understands Winblows has serious problems.
    • He understands that IRC has legitimate uses.

    Give him some time and the scales will fall off his eyes and his attitude will change. He's already noticed that it's hard for to exchange files with his friends, even though he pays big bucks for "broadband". Sooner or later, he will discover that http is also a text based protocal that takes little horsepower to run and is easy to set up in the home. When he realizes this he will start to question why he can't run his own and everything will fall into place.

    Seth, you should try a copy of Mepis sometime. It has all of the software that the big boys use to run websites, Apache, mySQL and PHP. It also has excellent and easy to use html editors such as Mozilla's composer and Bluefish. If all you want is static image galaries, just use the KDE file browser's one click generator. Mepis configures itself from a CD on boot and has a GUI installer that works. Mepis is easy and will hasten your enlightenment.

    The world of ends is waiting for you. It needs you. You can be part of the solution, not the problem. THE INTERNET IS THE NEW PRESS. IF IT IS NOT FREE THERE IS NO FREE PRESS. Kiddie porn is best fought by busting kiddie porn makers, not by regulating presses. It would be a shame if only a few "respectable" well regulated companies were alowed to publish on the web as the New York Times does.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  128. Animal pornography by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

    Animal pornography is not evil.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:Animal pornography by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends on how evil the monkeys are.

  129. Yep, Animal Porno is previlant on #mozilla by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    We got the lizard doing everything from making love the Linux Penguin to F**king Bill Gates and Microsoft in the a$$.

    Bestiality has never before been released under the MPL license.

    OpenSource fornication... the way of the future.

  130. Re: BitchX by SpyPlane · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad they didn't mention one of the *nix clients 'BitchX'. Who knows where they would take that one. Linux would be made evil *AND* misogynistic!

    --
    "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
  131. Thank god sweeps are over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember laughing watching their tease. Went something like: A local company YOU could be doing business with is involved with child pornography. Tune in at 11. Cut to picture of non-descript door with corporate logo pixelized so you had to wait, but in the final seconds the pixelization was mistakenly removed revealing the Voicenet logo at which point we all started laughing. Local news sucks! Thankfully sweeps doesn't last forever.

  132. What difference does the media make? by Visaris · · Score: 1

    I don't see any major difference between media. Paper, Stone, WWW, IRC, CD, DVD, VHS... These can all be used to store and distribute information. I don't understand why any of them should have laws governing their use in a way that is inconsistent with the others.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  133. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And IRC used to be worth using. Be packed full of wanna-be "haxors" for the foreseeable future. Not just on warez channels, but all over the damn place. Before today I thought the IRC script kiddy thing was dying down. Well chaps, thousands of raw recruits will be in place just as soon as they work out how to use mIRC.

    Thanks a bunch pal!

  134. Re:Of course (attributed to?) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Is not every place with free speech and relative stealthness a breedingplace for:
    -terrorists
    -virusmakers
    -worms
    -terroris ts
    -porn
    -terrorists


    Umm, I believe that those things exist whether there is free speech or not. And you can be stealthy anywhere. It all depends on what you/media/government want to attribute those things to...

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  135. I just emailed the NYT by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just emailed the NYT with the following:

    "You think IRC is bad? Just wait until you see what Slashdot.org is saying about you and your article!"

    Next up in tomorrow's edition of the NYT, an 'in-depth' analysis of the Slashdot editorial ethics and comment threads.

  136. Re:Oh, "19"90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fucking annoying and useless comment.

  137. In related news... by Mikoca · · Score: 2, Funny

    VoC (voice over copper) might have its legal uses but it is also one of the preferred meeting places of pimps, drug dealers and maybe even terorists. And don't think you are protected, as most homes are known to have a VoC access points, connected in the same network with public ones that can connect you with unthinkable villainry for as low as 50c. Fortunately, the FBI has been working on getting VoC surveillance rights that will ensure your safety, so hang on tight, you will be completely safe soon!

  138. The real IRC! by NeGz · · Score: 3, Funny

    A little long, oh well, you can't be banned from Slashdot? Right? Right..? :/

    00:57 (NeGz) god I hate media FUD like that NY Times article on IRC
    00:57 (NeGz) just saw it then
    00:57 (@Yavin) yer its crazy
    00:58 (@Yavin) "this just in, there is a secret BBS on the intarweb!!!!"
    00:58 (@Yavin) "crossing LIVE to Trishia Takinawa, with a report on the hotline protocol!"
    00:59 (@Yavin) wtlw NYT!
    00:59 @Yavin gets all angry
    00:59 (@Devar) lol Yavin
    00:59 (@Nevyn^) what _are_ you on about
    00:59 (NeGz) but you read this shit and you understand why some people will never bank over the net and such :/
    01:00 (@Yavin) this Nevyn^: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/06/132523 1
    01:00 (NeGz) http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/06/technology/circu its/06chat.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5062&en=a1bb0d2c7d 187e80&ex=1084420800&partner=GOOGLE
    01:00 @Yavin moderates NeGz -1, Redundant
    01:00 (NeGz) sif
    01:00 (NeGz) direct link to article
    01:00 (NeGz) +5 Informative, every time
    01:00 (@Yavin) hehe
    01:01 (NeGz) rah
    01:02 (NeGz) need an educational campaign
    01:02 (NeGz) GAMFUD - Geeks Against Media Fear, Uncertanity and Doubt -_-
    01:02 (@Yavin) or we could hire a bus, deck it out in wifi and tour the countryside. paint "The Clue Bus" on it and inform people on why tech isnt evil
    01:03 (@Yavin) or we could idle on irc and bitch about stuff
    01:03 (NeGz) have the headline of gamfud.org as PEBKAC
    01:03 (NeGz) yeah, idling sounds good
    01:03 (NeGz) also sleep
    01:03 (@Yavin) give articles such as that NYT piece the bigg rubber stamp of FAILURE
    01:04 (NeGz) I'm amazed that there are guys in my network security classes at Tafe that won't bank over the net :/
    01:04 (Ultima84) I bank over the net...
    01:04 (@Devar) rofl, they wont? man i fucking do everything over the net hey
    01:04 (@Yavin) haha yeah
    01:04 (NeGz) all you need is enough knowhow to check that you're not being phished/DNS spoofed and that the damn site's SSL cert is legit/secure :/
    01:04 (@Devar) i even applied for an E*TRADE account on the net >_
    01:05 (NeGz) I don't like shopping elsewhere -_-
    01:05 (@Devar) mind you i dont have the $1000 minimum to actually OPEN it
    01:05 (@Devar) but who cares :D
    01:05 (Ultima84) I bought crap off eBay :|
    01:05 (NeGz) I've got no car, so going places that aren't on the train line is TME
    01:05 (@Devar) hehe NeGz yeah
    01:06 (NeGz) should post this convo to slashdot -_-
    01:06 (@Yavin) +5 insightful
    01:07 (@Devar) haha NeGz go for it, edit it correctly and it'd probably be modded up since its in context LOL
    01:08 (NeGz) bags the karma :P

  139. Animal p0rn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What like they make p0rn for animals? Sorry but my dogs a prude, besides he has a problem with the remote control.

  140. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by jesser · · Score: 1

    She had called me when it started the Sasser-driven shutdown process - until that happened she had written off the computer's misbehavior as normal.

    Basically, most computer users buy it and expect it to work.

    Is it just me, or do those statements seem to contradict each other?

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  141. Use an EU Server by shoemakc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So how exactly does the FBI police a foreign server? On the other hand, the US hasn't had a great track record lately about honoring the autonomy of other countries....maybe it's all part of the plan.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  142. Obligatory MECC Timesharing XTALK post by swb · · Score: 1

    In high school in the early 80s, we had a K-12 academic timesharing system called MECC Timesharing System (which is kind of a proto-GNU acronym structure).

    Anyway, this timesharing ran on CDC Cyber series mainframes and had several pre-Internet multi-user applications that were wildly successful among anyone who could get access to the system:

    XTALK: Similar to IRC; the output is virtually identical. Supported a series of public channels, private channels, and some admin commands for booting users. Biggest annoyance was the way the Cyber handled lower case letters; they used more bits than uppercase letters and conversations often got cut off. The buffer accepted the typing, but the output got clipped. No binary file transfer or any of that sort of thing. (At 110 baud, what would YOU have wanted to transfer?).

    Scepter/Milieu: MUD, pre-mud. Persistent characters, spells, monsters, the whole nine yards. When MTS shut down in 1984, the source got leaked and a high school friend (who is now PhD in Csci and works at google) ported the application by manually re-typing it into a Sage IV micro (Pascal based, as was the original source). That copy got ported to VAX 11/780 by another friend. The original Milieu author ran a payware multiuser BBS that supported a later varient of Milieu after MTS demise; dunno whatever happened to any other versions.

    Combat: A text-based space combat game. This was tactical, not strategic and required you to interpret your ships placement versus other ships based on a one or two line numerical positions. When you died, you got kicked back to the command line with the phrase "Congratulations, you just bought the farm.", which became something of a catch-phrase. Quite hard, actually. I sucked at it and couldn't compete with the members of AGCP (A Group of Combat Players).

    Email/newsgroups: The email system (which I can't remember if it was written by the college students who admined the system or was a CDC product) was quite good, and feature a multi-topic bulletin board system in addition to private email.

    The MTS community, since it was exclusively based in Minnesota, also had a real-life social element to it, with MTHPs (MECC-Type H____ Parties, the H was made up to meet whatever the event was -- House, Hayride, etc). It kind of died off once MTS died off in 1984. There was a multi-user BBS started right after that offered some metro-area die-hards to hang out, but after that it kind of dissolved into the local BBS scene.

    Anyway, when the Internet came around for me in 1990 or so, it all seemed so *derivative*, since I'd experienced a multiuser computing phenomena already.

  143. Clueless Reporters by Inhibit · · Score: 1

    It appears that any given internet outlet that isn't sanctioned and approved by 5 governmental regulatory bodies or involve their parent corporation will eventually be vilified by clueless reporters. Note the little "i" in internet. I've seen writeups where they don't understand that the computer needs to be *on* for someone to use it..

    The first law of clueless technology reporting appears to be "include 'possibly' wherever possible".

    Now where'd I leave my reporter kicking boots..

    --
    You're reading Slashdot. Of course you like Linux and pc hardware
  144. Good IRC clients for Unix/Linux? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    I used to practically live on IRC via AmIRC on my Amiga, but haven't been back in years. apt-cache search irc gives a list of IRC clients, but what are the good GUI ones? Which ones should be avoided at all costs? Which can I use without being 0wn3d in 5 minutes after my first connection?

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Good IRC clients for Unix/Linux? by darketernal · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suggest irssi. Since you use Debian, apt-get install irssi-text. It's awesome.

      And don't try EFnet, or DALnet, try Freenode and OFTC (irc.freenode.net, irc.oftc.net.) Good stuff.

    2. Re:Good IRC clients for Unix/Linux? by grautgrams · · Score: 3, Informative

      XChat is quite okay. As long as you don't irc as root you should not have any security problems (if you take other normal security precautions)

    3. Re:Good IRC clients for Unix/Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda like cIRCus, an older client that works good for me. Prob is, it's orphaned, and no source code is out there that I can find. Be advised it uses libc5. I use it with RedHat 9.0 by adding the old ld.so package & the libc5 compatibility package. Works like a champ.

    4. Re:Good IRC clients for Unix/Linux? by rkaa · · Score: 1
      For the last year I've run mIRC (for Windows) under Crossover Office, currently 2.0 - runs like charm.

      If you want a native Linux app resemblant of Mirc, grab Kvirc .
      Needs the Qt toolkit, but not KDE. (Allthough you CAN build with a KDE dependency as well, it isn't the default, or wasn't when i last built it at least). Fun to script with :)

  145. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by jht · · Score: 1

    That's the point ;-)

    They buy it, plug it in, expect it to work and to be sufficiently secure. When it misbehaves, they write it off as "something they screwed up" because "computers are hard to use".

    That contradiction is what creates a market for freelance IT folks like me. Once they realize they're screwed, they call someone. Then, hopefully we get their house in order and set it up so they're properly protected. The business model there is that hopefully the happy, safe user will call for occasional maintenance and help with other tasks.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  146. This attitude is widespread. by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few issues ago, the letters section in 2600 included a peculiar missive from some schoolchildren, attacking 2600 for running an IRC server. They apparently learned in that class that IRC is the tool that perverts use to meet young girls. (Please mod down the idiot who'll take this opportunity to make allegations about Emmanuel.)

    Anyway, the editorial response was fairly dry, but the reader reactions in the next issue pretty much said what's being said here on /. today. There's no excuse for this kind of "journalism" and worse yet, it's being taught in schools as well. What can we do to fight back?

    1. Re:This attitude is widespread. by davew2040 · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, did this "missive from some schoolchildren" seem at all like a silly rouse? That would be my first guess.

  147. am I the only one... by robochan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who caught the irony of all the "...said in a telephone interview" parts of this?
    They're investigating a communication medium, yet can't even be bothered to use that medium to interview people related to it?
    wtg NYT!

    --
    ...Rob
    The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
  148. The head of the BSA is F'd up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that fights software piracy. "If they were only associating with each other and inbreeding, maybe we could coexist alongside them. But it doesn't work that way."

    I direct the readers attention to the quote in the above: "If they were only associating with each other and inbreeding, maybe we could coexist alongside them." ...

    So, people on IRC need sex0r each other, and the fedz will leave 'em alone, right?

  149. actual irc conversation by JaffaKREE · · Score: 0

    {Osama_In_The_House} y0 what up d00d
    {TalibanHQ_Cmdr} hey where u been
    {Osama_In_The_House} i g0tz to keep it on the d-low, that redneck Bush is after my a$$
    {TalibanHQ_Cmdr} yah i saw that shizz... but lately i thnk hes been too busy taking it up the ass from tony blair LOL
    {Osama_In_The_House} LOL
    {Osama_In_The_House} so yeah i dunno when ill be back... im at a webcafe in brroklyn
    {TalibanHQ_Cmdr} oh coo d00d you got anything goin down
    {Osama_In_The_House} well i got mad box cutters reaedy t go.. just waitin to see who shows up l8r
    {TalibanHQ_Cmdr} i hear akhmed is in ny somewhere
    {Osama_In_The_House} oh sweet il have to check him out... welll gtg my $5 almost up
    {TalibanHQ_Cmdr} peace bro catch you
    {Osama_In_The_House} l8r mohamm

  150. Not that silly, but by beforewisdom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IRC is a niche thing, so I don't think it is very silly the NYT "discovers" it now.

    It can only have been in the last few years with popularization of the internet that non IT people would be on the net enough to hear the term "IRC"...enough for it to move into a reporter's vocabluary.

    Earlier ( and still many present clients ) irc clients had very unfriendly interfaces.

    Now there is chatzilla and gaim which make it friendly enough for ordinary people to venture into it.

    I still run into many IT people who never heard of IRC or even USENET.

    Regarding their other point which people made fun of, usenet is wild if you look at decorum, but its not wild if you think that one time you had to know something to use it and now anyone with a browser can go to Google and read it like a blog.

    The streets are paved there.

    Steve

  151. Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This week, the network's chat rooms were abuzz with what seemed like informed chatter about the Sasser worm, which infected hundreds of thousands of computers over the weekend.
    And here I though the only people using IRC were clueless secretaries.
  152. How to do it, dammit by abb3w · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a fairly good piece on it in John McPhee's "The Curve of Binding Energy" , which gives some information on the topic; I believe that's where I first saw the salad bowl reference.

    Most of the ideas behind how to build a bomb are fairly simple. Critical mass and how to calculate it, implosion versus gun type bombs, the effects of reflectors, and so forth. I learned most of the basic math before I dropped my Nuclear Engineering major. Of course, there's no practical way for anything but a large government to make a fusion bomb; ignition temps usually need a fission primer charge. However, it's easy to get something that will cause fission and make a big boom, if you have the fissiles and use some simple approximations ("assume a spherical cow").

    Without the detailed computer modeling, you don't anywhere near as big a boom for your kilo of fissile U-235, Pu-240, or U233 (if you're getting exotic). What you get instead is a less efficient reaction, and more of your fissile material goes into the fallout directly rather than fission. Where 40 kilos or so could be optimized to probably around 100 kilotons, a quick-and-sloppy back of the envelope approach would give probably only 1 kiloton. So, yeah, a couple of aluminum salad bowls could be turned into a quick-and-cheap reflector for your bomb, but you would get as big a bang as if you used well machined berylium hemispheres.

    The hard part is getting the right material. Stealing fissile material is the easiest for anything besides a government-- isotope separation isn't trivial. And even in the Soviet dis-Union, bomb grade stuff is somewhat guarded. Much better would be some of the FRIGGIN HUGE non-fissile radioisotopes that are essentially just plain missing over there, and could provide a weapon nearly as effective. Stealing one of them, powdering the source (sometimes already done), mixing the powder with a standard fertilizer truck bomb, and blowing it up in a major city would be almost as effective as blowing up a nuke. True, there wouldn't be the lasting sheer "duck and cover" level of hysteria of "someone else has the bomb!", but it would be fairly high. The blast wouldn't level the city, but it could render the bulk of it unusable for a century or so.

    While terrorists of Bin Laden's ilk wouldn't hesitate to use a nuke that fell into their hands, they won't concentrate their construction efforts on fission or fusion weapons. Radiological weapons are a much more practical ambition for them to be seeking.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:How to do it, dammit by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Much better would be some of the FRIGGIN HUGE non-fissile radioisotopes that are essentially just plain missing over there, and could provide a weapon nearly as effective.

      Bull. Dirty-bombs don't work very well for several reasons:

      1. Building materials just happen to be the right stuff to shield against radiation.

      2. The most dangerous materials are the extremely "hot" ones that are fresh out of a reactor. In order to be that hot, they have a half-life of seconds to barely a few years. By the time it would be "stolen", it would be ineffective!

      3. Radiation by itself is far less of a problem than inhaling or ingesting radioisotopes. This stuff tends to be filtered by water plants. Farms in the local vicinity (yeah, right) would no longer be able to sell their produce, however.

      In the end, you'll pretty much do nothing more than increase everyone's chance of getting cancer. <sarcasm>What an effective terrorist weapon</sarcasm>

      There's also the question as to whether or not Bin Laden would have competent enough people to know what they're stealing. For example, spreading a bunch of plutonium (Alpha Emitter) would be laughable.

    2. Re:How to do it, dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In the end, you'll pretty much do nothing more than increase everyone's chance of getting cancer. What an effective terrorist weapon"

      Well, it IS effective... property values would go down, people would move away the first chance they get, businesses would flounder, much money and effort would be wasted in legal hurdles as soon as someone DOES get cancer, hospital expenses would go up if nothing else becaue people would want to get checked every thirty seconds.

      It's a pretty effective way to disrupt a (relatively brittle) urban culture.

      It won't do at all if you're a madman trying to kill as many people as possible, but it WILL do if you're trying to cripple an enemy's economy -- which means that you'd be most likely to see a radiological weapon in a grudge war. Fortunately those don't happen a whole lot anymore.

    3. Re:How to do it, dammit by abb3w · · Score: 3, Informative

      The most dangerous materials are the extremely "hot" ones that are fresh out of a reactor. In order to be that hot, they have a half-life of seconds to barely a few years.

      Cesium-137 has a half life about 30 years; long enough to last, short enought for relatively small volumes to be quite hellishly radioactive-- about 80 curies per gram, if I recall.

      In the end, you'll pretty much do nothing more than increase everyone's chance of getting cancer.
      <sarcasm>What an effective terrorist weapon</sarcasm>


      You've obviously never been personally involved in political debates on locating nuclear facilities; a large fraction of the population has hysterical phobias about radioactivity, even when there is no real danger. (I've seen a ditz go into hysterics on learning her skeleton was mildly radioactive from the natural potassium.)

      Furthermore, while there will be few, if any, people getting an LD50/60 dose from a radiation dust bomb, cleaning up such an irradiated area could be prohibitively expensive. Failure to clean it up would result in an highly non-trivial increase in cancer rates in the area-- enough to make five-pack-a-day smoking look perfectly safe.

      There's also the question as to whether or not Bin Laden would have competent enough people to know what they're stealing. For example, spreading a bunch of plutonium (Alpha Emitter) would be laughable.

      Have you even taken a radiation health physics class? Alpha emitters are quite dangerous under the right conditions-- as you yourself noted, the real danger is in inhaling or ingesting radioisotopes. Furthermore, when you deal with a radiation source that's internal, alphas are about the worst of the lot, due to the high absorbtion of the radiation over short distnaces. As I noted, this is why you powderize the radioisope beforehand for this sort of weapon: to increase the chance of dust particles being inhaled.

      The threat from a radiologic dust bomb isn't the initial short term exposure; it's the long term threat.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    4. Re:How to do it, dammit by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cesium-137 has a half life about 30 years; long enough to last, short enought for relatively small volumes to be quite hellishly radioactive-- about 80 curies per gram, if I recall.

      It's also primarily a Beta emitter. Quantities scattered in an explosion would tend to have a difficult time penetrating clothing and skin.

      I've seen a ditz go into hysterics on learning her skeleton was mildly radioactive from the natural potassium.

      Ok, now THAT is funny. I wish I'd been there to see it! =)

      Have you even taken a radiation health physics class?

      Yes, and no. Most of the knowledge I've obtained has been because I'm insanely curious. However, I did once work for a medical company that required me to take a class on radiation safety. They just used an electron beam, however, so it was a bit dull.

      pha emitters are quite dangerous under the right conditions-- as you yourself noted, the real danger is in inhaling or ingesting radioisotopes.

      Indeed. If inhaled Plutonium can be quite dangerous. Ingestion doesn't seem to cause too much trouble as your body just passes it through.

      As I noted, this is why you powderize the radioisope beforehand for this sort of weapon: to increase the chance of dust particles being inhaled.

      A few points:

      1. AFAIK, Plutonium is EXTREMELY hard to machine. That means that just about anything short of a nuke would not be able to powerize the material.

      2. Plutonium is very heavy. If dispersed into the air, it will come back to the ground very quickly. This minimizes the amount of time that people outdoors would be in danger.

      3. I'd almost welcome Bin Laden attempting to machine Pu-238 into a fine power. He and his men would probably inhale enough of the stuff in the process that we wouldn't have to worry about them for much longer. (Ok, so I'm a bit morbid. I'm feeling punchy today.)

      The threat from a radiologic dust bomb isn't the initial short term exposure; it's the long term threat.

      Let's consider for a moment what might happen to the radiological materials if they were dispersed in a city:

      1. We deploy our Evil Radioisotopes Weapon (TM)
      2. The blast carries the materials to within a 1 mile radius.
      3. The isotopes come raining down from above. Anyone who was near the blast is probably already injured, but has also inhaled radioisotopes. Sadly, these people will most likely die. :-(
      4. The radioisotopes hit the ground. Given that the bomb couldn't have dispersed more than a dozen or so pounds of material (and that is probably high) radiation levels are most likely not lethal. Given that concrete is an excellent shield, buildings absorb a lot of the radiation.
      5. Street sweepers and rain wash away the majority of the isotopes. They end up traveling through the sewers.
      6. Treatment plants remove many of the isotopes. Some make it into the rivers and settle to the bottom. Since water is a very good shield, the radiation levels are not detectably higher than normal.

      Now I'm not saying that someone detonating a dirty bomb is a good thing. In fact I hope it never happens. But it simply wouldn't be that effective of a weapon.

    5. Re:How to do it, dammit by tkw954 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "assume a spherical cow"

      -10 marks for incomplete assumptions. I think you mean "assume a spherical cow in a vacuum".

    6. Re:How to do it, dammit by ianturton · · Score: 1
      That'll be why there are hill farms in the UK that can still not sell lambs due to Chernobyl fallout. Seems the rain didn't just wash the stuff (mostly ceasium IIRC) away.

      Back when I was a geophysicist we used the fallout from air tests as a time marker since it was in the core regardless of where we collected them. This stuff floats quite well once you get it into the air. Now with a simple dirty radiological bomb you might not get it so far but it will spread and stay where it falls.

      Add to the actual effects the physcological impact on the local population, and lots of them are going to die in the panic of evacuation, then you've got a pretty effective weapon.

      Ian

    7. Re:How to do it, dammit by abb3w · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "assume a spherical cow in a vacuum".

      Er, no, not in this case. After you consider the special case of the infinite sized spherical cow, you assume a finite spherical cow enclosed in an infinite volume of some partially reflective material-- vacuum being a special case (where the reflectivity is zero) that falls out of the calculations afterwards.

      Assuming your spherical cow in a vacuum gives a bomb design that's a little too rough-and-ready for my taste-- it tends goes off on the assembly table, not at the target site.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  153. Personal Experience by Atanamis · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's not over the top at all. There are a number of worms that will infect a Windows box as soon as it's plugged in. I've seen a new XP install get infected within 20 minutes of first bootup.
    Actually, I just managed to get my home machine infected in under 10 minutes last week. I reformat and reinstall my Windows Server 2003 partition every 3-4 months. During my most recent reinstall, I made the mistake of leaving my computer plugged into my DSL line. While I was installing my firewall, I became infected and had the joy of watching my my computer shut down. I solved the problem by rebooting into Linux, and a few days later wiping the Windows partition and reinstalling again. This time I was careful to have a firewall up before I hooked up the DSL.

    --
    Atanamis
  154. glad I turned WPVI down for an interview... by PeterCook · · Score: 1

    Yep they (WPVI) called me about his one and after listening to their pitch to be on camera I said no. Glad I did - though I always turn down anything that is a sleazy topic like this. Rather be talking about the tech stuff than the sleazy stuff The reporter didn't have a clue about newsgroups when they were talking to me and he kept pushing for me to talk about porn. But that's most local and national news outlets these days....

    1. Re:glad I turned WPVI down for an interview... by hajihill · · Score: 1

      The reporter didn't have a clue about newsgroups when they were talking to me and he kept pushing for me to talk about porn. And what, pray tell, is wrong with talking about porn... ??? That sounds like a pleasant afternoon to me... :P

      --
      Of blankness, I know nothing.
  155. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by nolife · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you plug a Windows box directly into a high-speed Internet connection without updating everything first, the probability that you will be ownz0r3d rapidly approaches 1.

    From the SANS Infosec reading room, Windows XP: Surviving the first day (PDF). A little dated but good information for the not in the loop crowd.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  156. waste of time... by BalkanBoy · · Score: 1

    As someone who used to hang on IRC (EFNet as well as Undernet), I can tell you it's an extremely addictive thing... I've met numerous people from IRC and made numerous friends from it, so it can be a good thing too. If you only leave it at chatting but don't do much else, it's kind of stupid and you're wasting your time.. I used it as a forum to get together with my countrymen whom were also here in the United States.

    Overall, objectively speaking, if you have some other way of using your time in a constructive manner, you're better off doing that than wasting time on IRC. While this may be hard to do, it's usually the wisest thing to do.. Go write some open source software or what not... Much better use of your time.

    --
    'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  157. I.R.C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They made it look a bit like I.R.A don't you think?

  158. Only evil in the dress code. by Admiral+Justin · · Score: 1

    Not all channels are evil, for sure. :) I myself spend most of my day... and night, in the lockergnome chat room, helping people and providing support to people in trouble. I also do this on a few other channels. The network g4tv has it's official chat on IRC, too, #g4tv on irc.gamesurge.net

    --
    You will be baked, and there will be cake.
  159. It IS a drug, after all by Rithiur · · Score: 1

    Pfft, this is old news. Every Finn out there already knows that IRC is not good for your health, like all other drugs. I mean, it was portrayed in a documentary series each episode featuring different kind of drug. Come to think of it, IRC was propably the worst one, because it was the introduced in first episode.

    The show was very creditable and informative. It even had elite hackers compiling kernels just to make a lot of green text roll trough fast. It even featured an anonymous coward telling how he made it out of the hook, but his friend couldn't make it...

  160. Re:Where did they dig up that old FOSSIL?!?!?!?!?! by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2

    Honestly, this is probably just a PR-Hit from the Business Software Alliance written word for word by them and put in the paper by a lazy NY Times hack.

    Half of the "news" is PR hits. PR firms write the story, even include a trivially opposing view (for balance) then distribute it to reporters at all of the major news services hoping that natural laziness will kick in and they will run the premade story.

    A lot of the TV news is the same way. They call it a "Video News Release" they basically film the story with the PR firms own "reporter" - they send the smaller stations the polished footage and most of them just run it, the major networks get raw footage so they can edit in their own newsperson (I hesitate to call them reporters) asking those probing questions...

    Radio..same thing...

    It's very easy for the big PR firms to get hits. Once you get it into a major news services it gets picked up and repeated by hundreds of papers, almost none of them tell you that the story was written by XX's PR firm.

    Government does the same thing. Remember the Medicare Testimonials PR release?

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  161. What I want to know is... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

    WTF do they have against animal porn anyway? I mean, animals have libidos too, don't they?

    --
    No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  162. free soul-sucking registration required by sharkdba · · Score: 1

    slashdot2001/slashdot2001 should still work...

    must be a very popular login, if NYT ever checks the logs.

    --
    The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  163. Penny Arcade agrees about "breeding grounds" by OWJones · · Score: 1

    Apparently Penny Arcade agrees that people plus an audience plus anonymity equals a breeding ground for people to do stupid stuff.

    -jdm

  164. Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    IRC is great.
    digital darwinism, survival of the fittest.
    The way life is supposed to be.
    screw the self-richeous do-good-ers.
    More chaos is whats needed not less.

  165. Funny, I've heard this before by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've heard this before on the John Walsh show i was supposed to be a part of... ended up not accepting the offer to go to NY and over-slept my live chat with john walsh for the show.. besides the point, some lady on said show called IRC the "Dark Underbelly of the Internet"...."It's where pedophiles give lessons to luer children" And those are real quotes! Real Stream of said show Here I'm the "Oea" mentioned in the show... long story, but weird indeed.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  166. brings back warm fuzzies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happen to like evil.

    -SATAN

  167. IRC reaction by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

    <1:34> <borg> http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/06/1325231.shtm l?tid=126&tid=95
    <1:58:pm> <Spoom>|<zZzZz> damn wireless network keeps dying out here
    <2:31:pm> <@LD|Zz> "Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time" <-- this made me laugh
    <2:34:pm> <ZeroByte> "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance <-- this would have been better in l33t
    <2:34:pm> <ZeroByte> or at least if elite was changed to l33t
    <2:34:pm> <@LD|Zz> hehe, i'm a 1337 p1r4t3 :D
    <2:36:pm> <borg> haha, now im convinced that BSA are a bunch of idiots
    <2:47:pm> <Spoom> bwahahaha, they think that networking is used JUST to hide ip addressed :^D
    <2:47:pm> <Spoom> addresses*
    <2:47:pm> <Spoom> we can do that on one server thank you very much ;^)

    ^^ IRC reaction to this story (noted between my rounds of uploading 0 day warez of course) :^)

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  168. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by budgenator · · Score: 1

    But I can't complain, because Windows helps put food on my table. When they finally get it right, it'll be time for a new career!

    People used to say that about SCO back in the eighties, actualy they're still people saying that about SCO except the getting it right part. Lots of legacy apps out there that only run on obsolete OSes.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  169. If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot's?? by reallocate · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    >>"....(free soul-sucking registration required)"

    Why is every story Slashdot steals from the New York Times prefaced with the same smarmy parenthetical dig about registration? Why no similar slaps at Slashdot's very own registration?

    I registered with the NYT a long time ago. Guess what? Nothing bad happened.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  170. Re:Where did they dig up that old FOSSIL?!?!?!?!?! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

    Nnnggg... brain... collapsing...
    SPELL CHECK!!!!

  171. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by NeoThermic · · Score: 1

    Install XP. Then, before plugging in any network of any type: start -> control pannel -> network connections.
    Find your connection medium, and click properties. Click the advanced tab, and check the ICF box.

    Now connect up windows machine, and run windows update. I assue you, with the ICF active, you are not as big of a target as one might think.

    Best get a better firewall first before running windows update, as ICF is one way traffic [incomming] protected only.

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
  172. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Basically, most computer users buy it and expect it to work. They don't know about or care about security, and frankly shouldn't have to."

    They should care at least about the basics - don't click on attachments, use a firewall/antivirus, don't install everything they can download for free or everything shiny, learn to disable services they don't need, or even update their systems regularly, etc. They care about security, but it's just too hard because nobody taught them, or too lazy, or they don't know where to start. They should care about security because half of it relies on them to keep their computers safe. The vendor can only do so much, but in MS' case "so much" is lame. This increases the users' responsibility to keep their systems secure; thus, this increases cost despite MS' propaganda.

    Ask them if they care about security for their car, and you'll notice they don't leave keys in the car with windows down and/or unlocked doors.

    Seeing how you're benefiting from all this, it's obvious you want users to keep security on 0 priority.

  173. I was afriad by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    hehe i was worried that i was going to log on and read an article about how IRC is completely evil, and instead i am treated with virii infections and how In some ways, the biggest problem is Microsoft Windows itself. let's here it for the NYT!!!

  174. regarding your comment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude...learn some english. ok?

    Just because you use the word "Burbs" does not make you a cool guy on slashdot.
    Will your keyboard break down if you add Su?

    Also, avoid that bold lettering. Makes you look like a 13 yr old kid(if you are not one already; figuring from your userid).

    1. Re:regarding your comment.. by potus98 · · Score: 1

      Falling for the flamebait... :-)

      "dude...learn some english. ok?"

      burb also 'burb ( P ) Pronunciation Key (bûrb) n. Informal - A suburb: "when the condos get so dense out in those 'burbs that the deer have to run right through hot tubs" (Russell Baker).

      Grammer criticism on /.? Are you kidding me? Especially from an AC using improper caps, improper use of elipses, incomplete sentances, incorrect spacing, improper abbreviations, and sentance fragments. BTW: dude is also an informal noun.

      "Just because you use the word "Burbs" does not make you a cool guy on slashdot."

      Hmmmm, not sure how the use of "burbs" could be confused as an attempt to be "cool". Besides, there is no +mod for cool anyways. Of course, an AC may not be familiar with mod options.

      Also, do you think someone attempting to become a "cool guy" would have an account on /., read an article on anthropomorphizing Mars rovers at space.com, and then post an insightful comment about the article? C'mon!

      "Will your keyboard break down if you add Su?"

      No. However, I am conditioned to avoid the use of su whenever possible. I use sudo instead.

      "Also, avoid that bold lettering."

      Ooops! Agreed! However, the excessive use of bold probably saved you a small amount on your electric bill since fewer bright white pixels had to be rendered on your display. Multiply that by zillions of /.ers and I should get a Nobel prize for energy conservation!

      --
      This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
    2. Re:regarding your comment.. by dustmite · · Score: 1

      "Burbs" is English, you idiot. It's actually now a slightly old-fashioned colloquial/affectionate shortening of "suburbs" and is usually spelled with contraction apostrophe, e.g. "'burbs". This of course doesn't make the poster "cool", actually the opposite, it puts the poster in probably around my more "uncool" age group or older (28+). The fact that you don't know the word means tells me you're probably a teenager, and/or your English is actually weak: not only is "burbs" in the English dictionary, but you would almost certainly know the word if you did much reading.

  175. Mods--how was this flamebait or troll by bonch · · Score: 1

    Apparently, I'm being targetted for my opinions in previous posts.

    I've got the karma to burn in asking this.

    1. Re:Mods--how was this flamebait or troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy are you stupid. You're not being "targetted", you're being correctly modded down as a troll, because what you posted was clearly a troll.

      HTH

  176. No there isn't... by Perdo · · Score: 1
    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  177. Re:sensationalist ? (No Way!) by jht · · Score: 1
    They should care at least about the basics - don't click on attachments, use a firewall/antivirus, don't install everything they can download for free or everything shiny, learn to disable services they don't need, or even update their systems regularly, etc. They care about security, but it's just too hard because nobody taught them, or too lazy, or they don't know where to start. They should care about security because half of it relies on them to keep their computers safe. The vendor can only do so much, but in MS' case "so much" is lame. This increases the users' responsibility to keep their systems secure; thus, this increases cost despite MS' propaganda.

    Ask them if they care about security for their car, and you'll notice they don't leave keys in the car with windows down and/or unlocked doors.

    Seeing how you're benefiting from all this, it's obvious you want users to keep security on 0 priority.

    Amen, except for the last sentence (I pasted your whole message because it's otherwise an AC/0). I am benefiting from this, but I try and instill a security consciousness in my customers. I want them to be happy and not need me too much - and I'd rather they pay me to help make their computers more productive than pay me to squish worms.

    The simple fact is this: people like the readers of this thread Get It when it comes to securing their desktop. Another person in this thread said that best practices dictate starting up the new XP box, then turning on ICF before plugging in the chosen network connection. Great idea, but people like us already know that. The "average user" doesn't, and until they call me or someone like me they don't get that information by default. Nor are they even aware they should learn it. If Dell (or other vendors) pre-configured their new systems like that people would use ICF, but they don't so they don't.

    You use the car metaphor for security. If securing a Windows PC was as simple as locking a car is, people would secure their PC's. But it's a lot easier for a car salesman to show them how the remote keyfob works when a car is delivered than it is to teach someone how to use ICF, a NAT box, and Windows Update to get an XP system off the ground safely. If I sold hardware that'd be part of the checklist - but I only sell services so they call me after the fact.

    I want security to be a priority, actually - it's just that I can't force the issue. I can and do preach the security gospel to my customers, but they pretty much ignore it as geek ranting until they get burned. It's amazing what a worm hit will do to change people's attitudes...
    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  178. Napster? by ildon · · Score: 1

    I had to check my calendar when the author mentioned Napster as a big, evil file sharing network. Maybe this article was written in 1998 and just got lost in the shuffle.

  179. But IRC can also be a lifesaver by whowhatwhere · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile I don't share those concerns at all! I have "lived" on IRC for the past 8 years or so now. If I went looking I could find pirated things to download, sure. I could find animal porn, whatever. All of this I could also find on P2P or web. Why is IRC so different ??

    Well for me, it provides realtime and interactive community that works well with a screenreader. I have found friends all over the world. I met my girlfriend (who actually lives locally) on IRC.

    Like any community there will be the good, the bad and the ugly. Just to comment for a moment on the GOOD tho .. my girlfriend had her life saved a number of years ago by a friend she knew on IRC. She was a member of a channel for supporting who were losing their vision due to retinitis pigmentosa. She was not coping well with impending blindness and has gone into an alcholic coma while online. Her IRC buddy from california called my girlfriends local 911 and they found her in time. Its about community!!

    I have trouble seeing the entire negative viewpoint of that article .. like the rest of the world, you find what you are looking for.

  180. How do I by AcmeShells.com · · Score: 0

    There are good sides and bad sides to irc. You just have to figure out how to get on the good side.

    --

    AcmeShells.com The cheapest Eggdrop
  181. MUHAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only am I an IRCOp, but I also run a private IRC server (the family use it to stay in touch - we're kinda scattered all over the globe).

    I guess that must make me Satan then....

  182. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would you like not being able to even read the SD headlines unless you registered?

  183. Classic media are good, new ones are bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IRC is just a tool for communication. Just like every other communication tool it could be used for both good and bad things.

    Newspapers are for some reason considered inherently good, TV stations too... although I could post quite oposite example.

    In Serbia, under Milosevic regime *all* classic media (TV, radio, press) were actually his main tools for spreading nationalistic (fascistic) euphoria. Naturaly, there were some independent media, but they were always under heavy preasure.

    Maybe such misuse of classic media is always the case when some country goes to war without proper reason?

    In 1996, eight months after Serbia was connected again to Internet, mass scale protest against rose in Belgrade and other cities due to obvious electoral fraud. Web, email and IRC were main tools for us to stay informed and to spread the correct information. IRC was remedy for many of us to remain normal in such desperate situation (regime's represion was very tough in that particular period).

    Two years later, during NATO bombing, while wondering wether to hate more those who bombed me or those who had caused the bombing, IRC was tool for expressing thoughts and spreading hope. And for those who like emotional scenes, I will never forget one situation when I was online in the moment when air strike alert started. One by one, people reported that. Really scary, when you see list of towns and cities reporting, just like a flood. There is no other medium that in real time could represent some situation happening to so dispersed persons.

    Or just in one sentence: there is no inherently 'good' or 'bad' media, they are all good but easily misused.

    Sig for today: "Don't blame me for posting as AC."

  184. 20 minutes by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    Monday, my normal ADSL line, through a firewall, was down (because of Sasser? don't know).

    So I plugged my XP notebook on the other SDSL line which is normally only used for servers, and forgot to enable ZoneAlarm.

    20 minutes after the switchover, I saw the characteristic message signaling the presence of Sasser, and the computer shut down.

    Took me 2 hours to make sure everything was cleaned up: reboot in safe mode, cleanup "Run" in the registry, do an AV scan of c:\windows, reboot, search the net for details, manually check the relevant places, and finally do a complete av scan, and take the opportunity to let it delete the ~200 viruses in Eudora's attachment directory (around 20 a day; I guess that's the average for most people around here).

    So yes, from my experience: all you have to do is plug a windows machine into the net and your in trouble within 20 minutes.

  185. The So-Called Paper of Record by the0ther · · Score: 1

    Who would even want to be part of the "record"? The NY Times is a moribund old fool. I want to know about what is "new"...not what is "new to the NY Times". What a piece of garbage....they're doomed.

  186. 2+3=cats! by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    Hilarous!

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  187. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    Mainly because it is yet another ploy to get you to tag yourself so they can track you and file you in yet another database.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  188. Wait till see sees Freenet! by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    He'll have an aneurism!

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  189. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by reallocate · · Score: 1

    To correct your implication, you can read the NYT's headlines quite well without registering. Registration is required to read the text.

    Since you asked, I wouldn't object to registering to read Slashdot headlines. That would equate to registering to even see the site. I wouldn't pay for anything published on Slashdot, registration or no.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  190. Can find that on the "well-policed suburb". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Find a Chinese GBA ROM site in wich the release number is displayed in URL and make a keyword bookmark in Mozilla.

    I don't have the bookmark I made right now, but with all those Chinese sites it shouldn't be too difficult to find a proper one.

  191. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont be a fucking jew.. im not registering to read a fucking article.. you can read everything on slashdot without registering.. if slashdot made you have to register to read.. well id probably still read slashdot since slashdots registration WORKS.. NYTimes DOES NOT WORK IN OPERA..i create an account and the next day it doesnt work, im sick of it.. fuck NYTimes, and fuck you you fuck fuck fucker fucking fuck fuck

  192. Re:Lol by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    And kick or ban, not boot..

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  193. Generic datacenter Acceptable Use Policy by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    I've been shopping for a new dedicated server provider lately, and I'v ebeen paying close attention to the AUPs.

    In general, they look like this:

    1) No spamming
    2) No cracking
    3) No IRC ...so, I run a Jabber server, instead...

  194. IRC=underground; WWW=mainstream by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Haven't read the article but...

    It IS accurate to consider IRC as underground, and the world wide web as the mainstream. Apart from the fact that the mainstream crowd has never heard of IRC, there are many more underground stuff happening. I don't know about sex-related stuff but there is definitely more software/music/movie/etc piracy.

    The internet world is just immitating the "real" world. Just like how the mainstream knows nothing about illegal drugs/guns/satellite dishes/etc that can be purchased in the underground, they also know nothing of IRC. You know... 90% of the population probably never even knows where the underground black market for a particular product is--they never come into contact. Similarly, 90% of hte population probably never ever comes in contact with IRC...

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  195. NYT Discovers Earth's Wild Side: FIRE! by pherris · · Score: 1
    Let's hope the NYT doesn't discover the force that destroys thousands of homes and kills millions of innocent trees every year or we'll be eating cold sandwichs for the rest of our lives.

    It was a great "boogyman" story though ...

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  196. s/sircam/code red/ by notsoclever · · Score: 1

    Oops, brainfart.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
  197. Re: "moderator" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it is moderator when the channel is moderated (+m), though that probably wasn't what they were talking about.

  198. Evil. Truly evil. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    Here's some of the evil and immorality I've participated in as a direct result of IRC:

    - Downloaded porn and software from people who rightfully owned it... and wanted to give it away for free!
    - Joined the Church of Satan!
    - Discovered my local BDSM chapter!
    - Met my wife under dubious circumstances, and then lived in sin for two years!
    - Conspired to commit terrorist acts!
    - Participated in group sex!

    Without IRC, I would never have accomplished any of these evil, evil acts. Instead, I might have had to go outside and even talk to real people in person in dank basements while we plotted our evil. (Not that we didn't do that too, but IRC made it easier to organize our circles of evil.)

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  199. The article - minus pretty pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Internet's Wilder Side
    By SETH SCHIESEL

    Published: May 6, 2004

    T was just another Wednesday on the sprawling Internet chat-room network known as I.R.C. In a room called Prime-Tyme-Movies, users offered free pirated downloads of "The Passion of the Christ'' and "Kill Bill Vol. 2.'' In the DDO-Matrix channel, illegal copies of Microsoft's Windows software and "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time,'' an Xbox game, were ripe for downloading. In other chat rooms yesterday, whole albums of free MP3's were hawked with blaring capital letters. And in a far less obtrusive channel, a hacker may well have been checking his progress of hacking into the computers of unsuspecting Internet users.

    Even as much of the Internet has come to resemble a pleasant, well-policed suburb, a little-known neighborhood known as Internet Relay Chat remains the Wild West. While copyright holders and law enforcement agencies take aim at their adversaries on Web sites and peer-to-peer file-sharing networks like Napster, I.R.C. remains the place where people with something to hide go to do business.

    Probably no more than 500,000 people are using I.R.C. worldwide at any time, and many of them are engaged in legitimate activities, network administrators say. Yet that pirated copy of Microsoft Office or Norton Utilities that turns up on a home-burned CD-ROM may well have originated on I.R.C. And the Internet viruses and "denial of service'' attacks that periodically make news generally get their start there, too. This week, the network's chat rooms were abuzz with what seemed like informed chatter about the Sasser worm, which infected hundreds of thousands of computers over the weekend.

    "I.R.C. is where you are going to find your 'elite' level pirates,'' said John R. Wolfe, director for enforcement at the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that fights software piracy. "If they were only associating with each other and inbreeding, maybe we could coexist alongside them. But it doesn't work that way. What they're doing on I.R.C. has a way of permeating into mainstream piracy.''

    Two weeks ago, the F.B.I., in conjunction with law enforcement agencies in 10 foreign countries, announced an operation called Fastlink, aimed at shutting down the activities of almost 100 people suspected of helping operate illegal software vaults on the Internet. The pirated copies of music, films, games and other software were generally distributed using a separate Internet file-transfer system, said a Justice Department spokesman, but the actual pirates generally used I.R.C. to communicate and coordinate with one another.

    "The groups targeted as part of Fastlink are alleged to have used I.R.C. to have committed their crimes, like almost all other warez groups,'' the spokesman, Michael Kulstad, said in a telephone interview. Warez, pronounced like wares, is techie slang for illegally copied software.

    When I.R.C. started in the 1980's, it was best known as a way for serious computer professionals worldwide to communicate in real time. It is still possible - though sometimes a bit difficult - to find mature technical discussions among the tens of thousands of I.R.C. chat rooms, known as channels, operating at any one time. There are also respectable I.R.C. systems and channels - some operated by universities or Internet service providers - for gamers seeking opponents or those who want to talk about sports or hobbies.

    Still, I.R.C. perhaps most closely resembles the cantina scene in "Star Wars'': a louche hangout of digital smugglers, pirates, curiosity seekers and the people who love them (or hunt them). There seem to be I.R.C. channels dedicated to every sexual fetish, and I.R.C. users speculate that terrorists also use the networks to communicate in relative obscurity. Yet I.R.C. has its advocates, who point to its legitimate uses.

    "I.R.C. is where all of the kids come on and go nuts,'' William A. Bierman, a college student in Hawaii who helps develop I.R.C. server software and who is known

  200. That's nothing, by hjf · · Score: 1

    they haven't got into IIRC yet.

  201. Nope! No technical discussions here! by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    I guess they mean "legitimate" technical discussions, such as discussing the finer points of Outlook Express usage or who has the biggest registry. The other type aren't legit. I mean, it's just a bunch of open source losers doing useless garbage like developing the GIMP, which is clearly evil because it will put photoshop out of business, doesn't help SCO collect royalties, doesn't make a penny for MS, *and* it uses the GPL, which as we all know is unconstitutional. We certainly wouldn't want to condone *that*.

  202. that's not usenet by poptones · · Score: 1

    There are many open source projects using usenet forums and lots of companies do that on closed NNTP servers - but that ain't usenet. Use of NNTP does not equate with USENET. There's something to be said for product support (which I already pointed out) but a company would be supremely stupid to develop their new proprietary products in an openly accessible USENET discussion group.

  203. IRC = Internet Relay Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IRC used to be cool.... When I was 15!

    Now it's all 'H@y D00d, |)CC M3 s0m3 31337 W@r3z r I wIlL H@x0r y0ur B0x'

    It's run by script kiddies.

  204. Invisible IRC by Ramses0 · · Score: 1
  205. You're next by poptones · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Apparently you don't watch the evening news (never mind read the messages these folks exchange). If you're busted and they find ANYTHING that will give them reasonable cause to suspect you are hiding something hardcore (or even just actionable in their jurisdiction) they'll take your computers, your monitors, routers, switches, mice, keyboards, your DVD players, your game machines - you'll be lucky if they leave you with a clock radio and a telephone.

    1. Re:You're next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. This happened to someone at my college. The SBI came in to the dorm and took everything remotely electronic from the room, including not only a monitor, printer and speakers, but also a clock radio and various other completely unrelated stuff.

    2. Re:You're next by pete.com · · Score: 0

      Did you miss the part where I said "Police, FBI, and other law enforcement agencies don't seize computer equipment unless it is directly involved in a commision of the crime." Storing child porn on your personal computer would be be a crime.

    3. Re:You're next by Torne · · Score: 1

      They can't always establish whether your computer equipment was directly involved in the commission of a crime until they've taken it apart and read all the data. For example, if you were being investigated for possibly posessing kiddyporn, they would almost certainly seize your computer whether they had any reason to suspect you were using the computer to do it or not. The same happens for less serious crimes; a lot of the evidence that the police expect to find with a search warrant is no longer kept as physical evidence, but on computers, so they will often just seize computer equipment on general principle, and if it turns out the computer is nothing to do with it, they *might* give it back.

      As for them taking whole networks, they do. If they find your computer is attached to a network and several other computers, they reason quite correctly that you could be storing your files on any machine on the network, and so take all of them (and sometimes network hardware too because they may not know what it is).

    4. Re:You're next by pete.com · · Score: 0

      You don't need to take anything apart to analyze data. A forensic analysis of a dd image is absolutely admissible as evidence, and will be more than enough evidence to convict. This is first hand knowledge not something I heard or read.

      If the police (FBI, OSI, local law enforcement) show up at your door with a warrant to investigate you, you are had. True, if there are multiple PC's in the house they won't know which PC is involved. They've already done forensics in the case. They have your IP, login used, ISP logs etc... When they show up at your house it's to gather the final bit of evidence for the prosecutor and jail time for you.

      On the other hand they are NOT going to seize a companies servers to investigate an individual. A simple dd images (if needed) usually they just need logs as evidence. This is what the statement about police not doing seizures was speaking to.

      Quote from original post:

      "Just for the record, the servers were seized in January and no charges have yet been filed against Voicenet."

      I have had involvement with different aspects of cases like these. From doing the forensic investigation to find out who it is, the knocking on the door part, and being the contact inside a company that the police needed information from.

      The servers were seized part is just not done unless the investigation involved something like that companies business was involved in the kiddy porn distribution business.

    5. Re:You're next by Torne · · Score: 1

      How can you get a good copy of the data without taking it apart? How do you know that the machine isn't rigged to erase stuff if you boot it up the wrong way? You have to take the disk out and duplicate it using your own equipment in controlled conditions. What is admissible in evidence is not the issue; what is actually done is. I'm sure that yes, sometimes they will do it 'the easy way', but more often than not, they don't. I should point out that yes, my friend's experience is also first hand knowledge to me, because I was *there* when the police arrived with their warrant.

      You're assuming way too much about fairness; 'They have your IP, login used, ISP logs etc..', and 'When they show up at your house it's to gather the final bit of evidence'. This is wrong. Yes, this should be the way it works, but it isn't. The friend I mentioned had his house searched and all his computing equipment seized based on *hearsay* which had been reported to the police by a social worker; there was no computer-related evidence against him because he hadn't *done* anything and the police admitted this; they explicitly said that they were taking the computers 'just to be sure', rather than because they had any reason to think they were involved in a crime. At the time of the search they had absolutely no evidence to base a case on; the purpose of the search was to establish *anything at all*. He lived in a shared flat, and the police took the computers belonging to his housemates as well (who were not in any way implicated in the case), simply because they were connected by a network to share their cable modem connection.

      They held the equipment for eleven months without arresting him, charging him or even interviewing him informally; they told him this was because there was a 'backlog' and that it had taken over nine months for the equipment to be first looked at. When they finally did contact him, it was to say that they hadn't found anything, and asking him to come and collect his equipment; no apology, and no further explanation. Evidently, they were intending to base their case on the contents of his computer, without having any evidence to suggest that there was anything incriminating there to find.

      The net result of this was that he and three other people unlucky enough to be living in the same house were deprived of their posessions for nearly a year because the police thought that he might perhaps have been involved in a crime, despite having no evidence other than word of mouth that this was the case.

      Perhaps you live in some kind of nice happy world where these things don't happen, but they do in this one. I will admit that this case is probably an extreme and it may well be rare, but it happened.

      I never said anything about seizing company computers; when I said 'whole networks' I referred to home networks, like the one my friend had.

    6. Re:You're next by pete.com · · Score: 0

      Stick to what you know. You don't do forensics... it shows. There are lots of ways to get an image of a drive... the method used would be dependant on the situation you encounter. You don't always have to take a PC apart to get a bit copy image of it's drive. Better if it's still running because you get a RAM dump too. The original discussion was about a companies servers being seized and held etc.... I was responding to that specific issue.

      You brought the "my friend story" into it. You made the sensationalized statement about police smashing PC's and monitors. This is of course first hand experience too, right? Your quote follows:

      If a computer has had kiddy porn on it, they typically destroy the computer. The whole thing. Maybe the monitor too for good measure. --- Yes of course let's destroy the evidence, and possibly open ourselves up for a civil lawsuit, have internal affairs investigate us... etc.

      For the record I live just outside a large metro area, in the sunny south, it is a nice happy place.

      Did this happen in the USA? Judging by your jargon I would suspect you are from the UK.If this happened outside the US I can't speak to that as I have no knowledge of jurisprudence outside the US.

      Maybe he had done nothing wrong, but maybe there just wasn't enough evidence to convict and your friend was lucky.

      There are no guilty people in prison... if you don't believe me, just ask them.

    7. Re:You're next by Torne · · Score: 1

      It's all very well having clever forensic techniques existing; I'm not denying that they do. But there are not enough computer forensic experts that they can always take one along when they want to search someone's house. It's much easier to just take hardware. Especially if there is such a 'backlog' that it takes many months before an expert can take a look.

      I'd be interested to know how you propose taking an image of a running disk on a machine controlled by your 'opponent', btw, as I have a server whose configuration is specifically designed to foil legal investigation, and it'd be nice to discover any more holes. Same goes for a RAM dump - surely you aren't expecting the machine to cooperate with you? =)

      If I muddied the issue, I'm sorry; my original statement remains, though, that it is far more common and likely for hardware to be taken (whether it's from a company or an individual) than not. As for my 'sensationalised' statement, I have no first-hand experience, as my friend was not charged. However, it's been reported widely by many news sources whom I trust, and I have read more than one court transcript of the subsequent civil lawsuit.

      Yes, this did happen in the USA. I am from the UK; I was visiting my friend in the US when his house was searched.

      Whether he had in fact done anything wrong is pretty irrelevant to the story, if you read it correctly; my point was that the kind of evidence which would definately require examination of computers (such as logs from online services..etc) *did not exist* - he was explicitly told that they took the computers just because it's common to find evidence against someone for all manner of things on their computer. Your post suggested the opposite.

    8. Re:You're next by pete.com · · Score: 0

      But there are not enough computer forensic experts that they can always take one along when they want to search someone's house.

      Again I remind you, stick to what you know.There are enough to do planned house calls.

      I'd be interested to know how you propose taking an image of a running disk on a machine controlled by your 'opponent', btw, as I have a server whose configuration is specifically designed to foil legal investigation, and it'd be nice to discover any more holes.

      Well of course you do, and it is only running like this to hide your emails to grandma right? Some amazing contraption that foils all attempts to analyze it. Experts from around the world have tried and failed against this mighty, forensic expert, crushing machine. It is people that think like you that makes this job so much fun.8-> My first guess would be you have a root kit installed, so sneaky. No way around that, grab the sledgehammer Joe!

      Same goes for a RAM dump - surely you aren't expecting the machine to cooperate with you? =)

      The machine won't cooperate... well there goes my entire game plan right out the window.

      ...he was explicitly told that they took the computers just because it's common to find evidence against someone for all manner of things on their computer

      I guess the police always show all their cards in an interview? If that is the story they gave and you still let them walk out and hold your stuff for that long you are all fools; or more likely guilty and too scared to raise a fuss.

      I still say your friend was lucky, not innocent. This entire conversation is tiring now, this is likely my last reply on this topic unless you can conjure up something I haven't heard 50 times.

      If not, its been a pleasure speaking with you.

    9. Re:You're next by Torne · · Score: 1

      Well of course you do, and it is only running like this to hide your emails to grandma right? Some amazing contraption that foils all attempts to analyze it. Experts from around the world have tried and failed against this mighty, forensic expert, crushing machine. It is people that think like you that makes this job so much fun.8-> My first guess would be you have a root kit installed, so sneaky. No way around that, grab the sledgehammer Joe!

      I'm glad you're entertained. It runs like that because it was the logical conclusion of improving the security configuration of my currently deployed server; it's an interesting experiment and currently hosts no data. Perhaps it will at some point in the future.

      Root kit? I think not.
      * User's data is encrypted using keys generated from their logon exchange. The keys cannot be read from kernel memory while the user is logged in as root cannot read kernel memory or attach debuggers. The files cannot be read by a different user, even root, while the user is logged in as mandatory access control forbids it. You cannot su to that user because once you are logged in, no process you create can setuid().
      * Swap space is encrypted.
      * All processes run under least-privilege ACLs through mandatory access control.
      * No user can run any program that is not owned and writable solely by root. Any root process not created during startup may not write to any file outside root's home directory. This means no installing or compiling anything.
      * The machine's ssh host key is stored in RAM and not backed up anywhere; turning it off (to tamper with the drive contents) will lose you the key and thus no user will log into the machine once it has been tampered with. No process may access the host key other than sshd; no process may inspect sshd's memory or attach a debugger to it.

      That's a pretty brief summary of the important points. Obviously, no system is perfect; I was interested in seeing how far down this road it's possible to go without requiring security hardware. Comments would be welcome.

    10. Re:You're next by pete.com · · Score: 0

      Oh... give me a break.

      Good luck!

  206. Re:Remember tonight! by handslikesnakes · · Score: 0

    You make me physically ill.

  207. Stupid mistake by poptones · · Score: 1
    anyone could use an anonymous proxy to cover the IP

    This is how people get arrested. How do you know you can trust the proxy? If you are connected to a box cracked by a worm or some script kiddy, odds are it's some windows box on a cable modem. It's likely to have ZERO security and if it has a relatively new OS on it it would take about thirty seconds to crack into it and get a list of ALL the machines with active connections to it. If it's an older machine then, darn it, you gotta take an extra minute or two to upload a toolkit.

    Lather, rinse, repeat.

    And what if it's not a script kiddy box at all, but a share on some vigilante's honeypot?

    Trusting proxy servers while doing illegal shit on IRC - if you don't really, really, really know what you are doing - is just a fast pass to the local lockup.

  208. Not so informative by poptones · · Score: 1
    Many apologies to the downtime of the publicly available IIP network - the hardware supporting the end server has been destroyed - and the programming and support for this project has been severely lacking.

    Wanna guess why? Not some conspiracy - just because no one used the thing. So what if you have an "invisible mesh of servers" if there are only 1000 users? Doesn't take long to nail down 1000 IPS when they're all connected to one another 24/7. We discussed this in the support forum many times and, so far as I can recall, nobody ever came up with a reasonable solution to prevent people from disconnecting and reconnecting. Do that enough times, pretty soon you've got everyone's address.

  209. Re:Lol by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

    Actually a lot of IRC is used as a chatroom. Granted, mostly it's for piracy. I've used IRC to keep in contact with a couple friends in that a re in the army. Also, I know tons of guilds in like Everquest have their own IRC channel to chat on. /shrug

  210. Need I say LAWSUIT :) Defamation of character by pkarlos_76 · · Score: 1

    Let's get serious and make them accountable for what they print. Get them to print a retraction. Everyone e-mail them, and RUN to the lawyers. let's fight fire with fire. The Hot Shots do it as they fight forest fires why can't we. Ooops, wait I forgot their the bully and I'm the little Jehovah boy who fought back, oooh no I'm being fined $332 and 90 days probation......oooh well fat chance.

  211. Re:Dead girls dont say no by Snover · · Score: 1

    Oooh, I dunno, this one is a bit more incriminating...

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  212. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by reallocate · · Score: 1

    So, Slashdot and OSDN just throw all that registration data away?

    Why are people so paranoid about a website knowing that you've been there? Do you all wear disguises and use phony identities when you shop, buy gas, write a check, get a mortgage....

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  213. Re:If NYT Registration is Bad, Why Isn't Slashdot' by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Typical anti-Semitic moron. Thanks for showing your true colors. Better go shave your head and polish your boots.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  214. Re:Darn! Now average joe will use it and ruin it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Average Joes already pollute IRC. The new elite use MUC.

  215. For me IRC=boring by earlgreen · · Score: 1

    All I've used IRC for is (a) providing technical support to customers, and (b) holding bored, er board meetings for a non-profit I'm a member of. Yawn. Very boaring, er, boring.

  216. But it true!! by Punto · · Score: 1
    quote from the acticle:

    Chris Behrens, an I.R.C. software developer in Arizona known online as Comstud, said: [...]

    A "/whois Comstud" on efnet gives:

    | channels : @#OlsenTwins

    So it's all true!! it's nothing but child pr0n and communism!!

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  217. The real wild side... by Mr.Mysteriosity · · Score: 1

    Pssh, we all know Usenet is the "Unmoderated wild side" of the internet. I knew it the first time I read the server list and spotted such horrors as 'alt.binaries.pictures.child'.

  218. IRC by sysbot · · Score: 1

    Is that a new Microsoft application?

  219. that's not a real discovery by sarvik · · Score: 1

    compared to what lies for the NYT once they find out about /.

  220. something even worse... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

    coffeehouses with wifi internet access

    i know it's where i like to do my dissention (and debugging) *evil laughter*

    --
    Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  221. This guy forgot few things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did he forget to put on his brain on before writting that article? and on top of that...everyone knows those things, else you're a newbie...its no news people have been trading files for ages there...ive been in IRC since back 1996 and this guy seem to forget that there is also good things happening in there (i met lots of good friends and my actual boyfriend there) And yes i agree with that post saying that google is all you need, one time they banned me access to irc/p2p in a network...and google was enough to find everything i wanted:P I cant wait to see when they apply DCC2 on IRC, that will be fun:)

  222. we use it for work by Merlinus · · Score: 1

    I've been using IRC since 1989 or so, and set up the first IRC server in Minnesota - was the op for it until 1994 or so. At my current employer, I set it up as an IM tool for the development teams in geographically distant offices to stay in touch. IM (e.g. MSN or Yahoo) are also in use. Of course, for urgent things we meet f2f or use the phone :)

    But IRC is an excellent workplace mechanism and alternative to email, enabling lots of people near or far to communicate asynchronously and ask questions of each other, etc. And chat logs or screen shots are great for recording those hard to remember answers or cut/pasted code bits that get passed around.