Slashdot Mirror


LA to Oregon at Mach 9

Kallahar writes "Last April I hooked up a video camera to my front bumper and drove from Los Angeles to Oregon. The video is finally done; it's sped up 95x which makes the trip a mere 6 minutes long. To do the recording I hooked up a VCR inside the car and recorded in real time, then captured the entire thing to the hard drive and changed the framerate of the avi. The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total, which makes for a fairly affordable hobby/art project."

569 comments

  1. I want to see an around the globe trip! by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    cool nonetheless.

    1. Re:I want to see an around the globe trip! by JPriest · · Score: 1

      I thought about doing something like this to do a homebrew "Getaway in Stockholm" video. I am sure the cops wouldn't find it amusing though.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:I want to see an around the globe trip! by nolife · · Score: 1

      Getting off topic but I've collected several GB's of videos of random racing, playing, and off the wall car and motorcycle stuff from KaZaa over the last few years. I could search around the web and ftp sites for it but P2P makes it easy to find and easy to get. Say what you want about P2P but there are legal uses.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:I want to see an around the globe trip! by ajrs · · Score: 2, Funny

      some guys took an eighty day trip around the world and sped it up to take about 2 hours. coming soon to a theater near you.

    4. Re:I want to see an around the globe trip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last summer I drove from New Hampshire to Las Vegas with a quickcam on my dashboard, laptop in the passenger seat and a frame every 10 seconds. Just under 3000 miles and the video is about 18 min long. I let it record while I slept and everything, cool footage.

  2. Big file by tpearson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posting a link to a 65mb file on your own site is brave.

    1. Re:Big file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's great watching the download speed drop as more people get their slashdot fix...

    2. Re:Big file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, started out at ~120 kb/s, now down to 80. I wonder if it'll finish before the site is slashdotted?

    3. Re:Big file by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Funny

      He should do a movie called: "Slashdot posting to server crash at mach 9".

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    4. Re:Big file by bdkives1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      14 comments, and the server is gone...

      Zero to Slashdotted in 9 min.

    5. Re:Big file by TelJanin · · Score: 1

      It's still downloading, but yeah, the page is dead...talk about overload.

    6. Re:Big file by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'd love to get a camera into an ISP or colo somewhere that you know ahead of time would crumble under severe slashdotting and then record the entire episode from pre-slashdot article posting to post catastrophe. Could be interesting. :)

    7. Re:Big file by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1

      Well, on the "backup site" i'm getting over 340 KB/s. He's faring quite well indeed, and there's already been enough time for a nice slashdotting.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    8. Re:Big file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      should have used freecache

    9. Re:Big file by nastro · · Score: 1

      At least he posted it at the right time, when people like me have just come home from our local drinking holes, and aren't likely to have the patience to wait for the download, regardless of the site being slashdotted or not...:)

    10. Re:Big file by sniepre · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What entire episode would that be? I mean.. so you get /.ed.. that means that you have < (x) bandwidth and/or serving capacity in machine power needed to serve your contents to (y) the demographic among slashdotters who care about the topic material.

      Assuming the site was hosted in a colocation facility and the user even *had* 24/7 access to his cage or rack, more than likely all that would happen is the server begins chunking out, he tries to get into it to remove some content if he is paying attention, otherwise it just sucks till the demand drops (or if running older IIS, gets "set" by a "temporary stealth administrator" to display goatsepr0n.) If he cant get in, he triggers a remote power supply to reset the machine, it comes back up, he gets in... Crisis averted.

      Unfortunately that rarely happens though on here it seems.. In my experiences, a good site slashdotting to the point of no return i'd say for links that I click maybe one in fifteen slowed down sites have content adjusted on the fly to compensate, most site admins don't appear to be paying the attention to notice that they're crawling to a halt. It is in itself an interesting phenomenon, a frequent reminder on how spontanteous and enormous the internet is.

      But back to the point, no, I don't think that video would be any fun. If anything at all, itd be some kid in his 20s with a toolbox and a laptop sitting on a hard raised-tile floor for 20 minutes behind a wall of rackmounted crap. :)

      --
      Is not life a hundred times too short for us to bore ourselves? -Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
    11. Re:Big file by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      Maybe before, but now i'm getting ~10k/s
      Still not a totally dead server, which is impressive.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    12. Re:Big file by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Funny
      When my Christmas Lights got Slashdotted in 2002, a 40-amp circuit breaker actually popped at the ISP ... which makes a great story, but realistically it was almost certainly co-incidental. More "fun" was watching my neighbor's reaction in 2003 when the Christmas Lights starting going on and off at the throttled maximum rate of once/5 seconds.

      You can read more at my Slashdot Effect on Christmas Lights page.

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    13. Re:Big file by genka · · Score: 1

      /. could be responsible for the circuit breaker. Networking equipment uses more power to process more traffic. I saw a circuit breaker pop in a training class, when a broadcast storm was induced on a Cisco 5505 switch.

    14. Re:Big file by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Not really. 65 millibits is pretty small.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    15. Re:Big file by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Not when he's smart enough to offer a torrent of the file.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    16. Re:Big file by furchin · · Score: 1

      Back for more, huh?

    17. Re:Big file by itwerx · · Score: 1

      should have used freecache
      Who the heck modded this Troll?
      If anything it deserves an Insightful!
      Moderators on crack again...

    18. Re:Big file by NuclearDog · · Score: 0

      No problem for me to notice if I get lots of traffic to my site. My hard-drive is so loud I can hear a user accessing my site from the other end of the house...

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    19. Re:Big file by CPD · · Score: 1

      this might be suicidal. but i did a time-lapse of me putting together a 3,000 piece jigsaw puzzle earlier this year.

  3. You realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That I can prove you were speeding using this, right?

    1. Re:You realize by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

      "Trip: 695.3 miles in 9.5 hours"

      Let's see ... that makes an *average* of 73 mph ... that does seem speedy! Especially considering that is not peak speed.

      Now who is going to analyze the film using known distances (lane stripe length and pitches, distances between intersections, etc.) to calculate his instantaneous speed throughout the trip? :]

    2. Re:You realize by bot24 · · Score: 1

      No, you won't be able to tell how fast he was going because that large fly smacked against the lense shortly after he left town. That would be a waste of bandwidth! /.ed by people downloading a 2 second clip of road followed by dark blurryness.
      Disclaimer: I didn't actually get this video!

  4. New Orleans to Seattle... by dnahelix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I put a digital camera on my dash that took a picture every minute and have a movie of my drive from New Orleans to Seattle. It's awesome, but you only get about 1 frame per mile.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
    1. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by tx_mgm · · Score: 4, Funny

      :snip:...took a picture every minute...:snip:....1 frame per mile

      I hope you stayed out of the fast lane doing this, grandpa!
      kidding...kidding...

      --
      Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
      -Dr. Weird
    2. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about 0.85714285714285714285714285714286 frames per mile? Would that make you happy?

    3. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I hope you stayed out of the fast lane doing this, grandpa! 1 picture per minute gives 1 frame per mile... One mile per minute. That's an average of 60mph.

      That's not so slow - especially if the speed limit out there is still 55mph. Not to mention that, across that kind of distance there'll be a whole lot of fuel stops and whatnot which drag down the average.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by nten · · Score: 1

      I think it might look smoother if instead of taking a picture at time intervals, they were taken at distance intervals. Gets rid of long pauses at gas stations, lights etc., and you'd actually see more detail when your moving fast so you wouldn't miss whole sections of scenery. You wouldn't be able to detect increases or decreases in speed from watching the video however.

      This might be a bit more complicated to implement, but you could do it pretty easily if you connected both the camera and a GPS to a laptop and triggered images off a change in position. You'd need some threshold value so you don't get pictures due to jitter in the GPS data, if you've got an in car system with an inertial sensor and GPS combo with a filter it would be even better.
      The best solution might be to pull the VSS line off of the engine control unit. In my friend's del sol I found it was a pulsed signal, just used the frequency counter on my multimeter piped into a thinkpad and divided by some constant integer (not sure why) to get the same speed as the GPS I was recording. So you would just integrate the position deltas from the velocity, as long as your not squealing your tires it would be plenty accurate.

      --
      refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    5. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Weird> Gentlemen...BEHOLD! I have grafted a deer antler to my crotch!
      Steve> But how are you going to...
      *Dr. Weird urinates out of mouth onto Steve*

    6. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1
      Very cool! I'm curious -- how jerky does it look? (I'm thinking compared to the article, where he had all the trip filmed.)

      In '99, my (now) wife and I took a two-month road trip: Vancouver to San Diego to Texas to New Orleans to Indiana to Wisconson to Ontario to North Dakota to Saskatchewan to Vancouver. I really wanted to do something like what you did. I did the math and figured that 1 picture/minute x 30 frames/second == ~1 hour of film.

      Unfortunately, an 8mm camera that could do this was too expensive (at least, it was at the camera shop I checked at), and I certainly didn't have the money to pick up a laptop and camera. If/when we do this again, I'm definitely going to be doing this.

    7. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by nule.org · · Score: 1

      That's about the framerate I got when tribes 2 first came out. Hopefully you drove into things less often than I was. (And hopefully people weren't shooting at you quite as often.)

    8. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Thanks meringuoid. Actually the speed limits in some places was as high as 75mph, but with the stops and especially the traffic jams when getting close to almost any city brought down the average. In fact, I have way too many speeding tickets!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    9. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Actually, I liked standing in front of the car and posing until the picture snapped every time I made a stop. I would also park the car pointing at interesting landscapes and get a few frames of time-lapse clouds and stuff.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
    10. Re:New Orleans to Seattle... by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      It does look kind of jerky when playing, considering I could only go as fast as 1 frame per minute. The camera (a kodak DC290) could only do timelapse in order of frames per minute.
      I was at first intrigued by the article, considering he had actually video-taped the entire journey, but then read he just kept every 100th frame, making his time-lapse about 1 frame every 3 seconds or so, for a much smoother time-lapse.
      What I think would be interesting would be to actually take the video and blend frames, speeding the whole thing up, but keeping all visual information. Of course every frame would be a motion-blur, but that's how it would really look if you were actually traveling that fast!

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  5. Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by Sampizcat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wow, first post. I feel 1337. Seriously though, is there any performance hit or other reason why you wouldn't record straight to (RAM then) hard disk?

    1. Re:Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably doesn't have a hard disk in his car! What kind of geek is he!?

    2. Re:Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by einer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      is there any performance hit or other reason why you wouldn't record straight to (RAM then) hard disk?

      Power for one. An affordable digital video hard disk recording solution may consume more power than a VCR. Remember, at a minnimum you'd have to power a disk, a video encoder and a backplane (unless both the hd and video controllers are integrated I suppose). A professional solution would cost more than a VCR. A homebrew system is possible, but also has drawbacks. It's probably more cumbersome and complicated. VCR's require very little time to get from an unpowered state to an actively recording state since digital solutions may require a booting period. A VCR has standard and easy interface. The homebrew interface may be rougher.

    3. Re:Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry...I wasn't aware he was pushing the car to Oregon...because if the engine is running, there is more than enough amps available to run a whole host of equipment, although maybe not as much as Homer Simpson had in his car.

      I think it's more likely that a VCR is cheap and relatively sturdy, whereas a laptop (even an old one) is not. Not to mention, a lot of car insurance will limit coverage for electronics unless it's on the way from the store to your home or you're moving from home A to home B (I found out the hard way when I was rear ended carrying about five expensive computers in my trunk, not covered).

      The only downside with a VCR is having to swap tapes but when you think about it, this is not unreasonable. I sure wouldn't want to drive more than six hours without stopping for food or gas or whatever, perfect tape swapping time.

      So really it's just about what's easiest, not power concerns. A DVR based solution sure is sexy, but pointless unless you'd like stream the video to other cars driving alongside or something.

      - JoeShmoe
      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    4. Re:Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      I used webcam32 for my trip (Tampa Florida, to Los Angeles), recording one frame/sec to the hard drive, then I put the whole thing back together into a video clip after I arrived. I used webcam32 to send the frames up to a web server, as long as my cell modem had connectivity. I had connectivity through most of the South East US, but it was very poor through the South West, where there isn't much more than dirt to keep you company. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:Why not just record straight to the hard disk? by fldvm · · Score: 1

      The only downside with a VCR is having to swap tapes but when you think about it, this is not unreasonable...
      So really it's just about what's easiest, not power concerns. A DVR based solution sure is sexy, but pointless...

      I would like a DVR solution that starts taping when I turn on the key and off when the key is off. When the DVR is full it could start deleting the older stuff. I would like to have a camera in the front and in the back and saved to the same frame. It would be great if I am driving and witness an accident or I see a cop run a stop sign.
      of course I would like 3 buttons:
      One to save the last 60 seconds of footage when some one else does something stupid
      One that wipes the last 5 min of footage when I do something stupid.
      And a 3rd that sets the thing On fire when I get pulled over and I know I am guilty as hell.

  6. 65MB videos? by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    Come on, that's like actively saying "I want my site to be fucked in the ass by the Slashdot Effect".

    Why no freakin' BitTorrent? That seems obvious, especially if you're the one who submits your site full of absurdly large videos to /.

    (FYI, I'm getting 22k/s, on a link that usually gets about 25. Not too bad, now watch that server burn in about 5 minutes...)

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:65MB videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just went from 200 KB/s to about 80 KB/s in the past four minutes. And it's still dropping.

    2. Re:65MB videos? by Piranhaa · · Score: 1

      I do believe this is the FIRST and LAST time someone will do this and post it on the internet...

    3. Re:65MB videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be too sure. Silicon-based processor speed can double every 18 months till a physical limit. But stupidity is infinite.

    4. Re:65MB videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Er, not necessarily the case. Check your
      trace up to dreamhost.com. They've got pipe.
      Also, check out the session management they've
      set up in Apache. They'll survive /. just fine.
      It's the idiots who run videos off a small
      pipe or dumb default-apache setup that have probs.

    5. Re:65MB videos? by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      I agree... where's the fuggin' torrent?!

    6. Re:65MB videos? by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      that's like actively saying "I want my site to be fucked in the ass by the Slashdot Effect".

      So that's what happened to goatse.

    7. Re:65MB videos? by polecat_redux · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why does the Slashdot Effect not affect Slashdot, of all places? Perhaps Slashdot should branch out into web hosting.... ;)

    8. Re:65MB videos? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Interesting


      It's at dreamhost.com? Damn, I didn't even traceroute it. I know their equipment! Small world. Ya, they have plenty of bandwidth, and their servers are pretty good. It's probably maxing out the connectivity for that one machine (or cluster, I don't know their stuff that well).

      For anyone interested, they do have a really sweet setup. I've talked to their techs a few times, who gave me the tour.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    9. Re:65MB videos? by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Why does the Slashdot Effect not affect
      >Slashdot, of all places?

      Because smart people setup this website.

    10. Re:65MB videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because smart people setup this website.

      Why don't they manage it?

    11. Re:65MB videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It's at dreamhost.com? Damn, I didn't even traceroute it.

      personally I use the ultra 133t "see the acknowledgement on the site, right there at the top of the screen that mentions it's hosted at DreamHost" method.

      the rest of the time I've got better things to worry about. Either its slow or it's not.

    12. Re:65MB videos? by upside · · Score: 1

      It's a cool vid and he gets referrals to his ISP - see the link on his top page and the advert on the right hand edge of the dreamhost website.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    13. Re:65MB videos? by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > Because smart people setup this website.

      What happened to them?

    14. Re:65MB videos? by seafortn · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is a new marketing technique -
      1. have one of your "users" post some ridiculously large file
      2. survive the slashdotting
      3. profit!!!

    15. Re:65MB videos? by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Not sure, I keep looking. :)

  7. More interesting route. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd like to see someone do this with a more interesting route (yes, I'm a Portlander). This would be cool for, say, Route 66 - and possibly at 1/50th (or a selection of several speeds/frame rates).

    Anyway, it's a pretty cool video and actually something I'd thought about years ago. Glad to see someone else had the same idea. :)

    1. Re:More interesting route. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Another cool route would be the one that Russian woman takes through the Chernobyl dead zone. I'd love to see video from the bike of that at semi-high speed.

      Hell, just pre-record all the major trips a person could want to make and let peopel download them and watch in real time as they travel those same routes. Beats the hell out of a map! ;)

    2. Re:More interesting route. by ItMustBeEsoteric · · Score: 1

      If you want to see the video at other speeds...stuff like VLC can change the speed a LITTLE on the fly...and any numbers of programs can let you tweak to heart's content.

    3. Re:More interesting route. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I don't want to show six minutes worth of data (frames) in twelve minutes. I want to double the data (frames). If the video has had 99 out of every 100 frames deleted, there is nothing that will change that other than returning to the original video that had 100:100 and stripping out fewer frames.

    4. Re:More interesting route. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no doubt. driving the 5 to Oregon is about the most boring trip I can think of, nothing but trucks and more trucks for the most part... I'd prefer taking the 101 at least part of the way up just to break the monotony. the scenerey is better, at least.

    5. Re:More interesting route. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hate to break it to you, but most of Elena's trip has now been definitively been proven to be a fake, specifically the part where she actually rides through Chernobyl on her bike. She (her husband? can't remember) also apparently re-arranged some kitsch to make a better shot.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    6. Re:More interesting route. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      That sucks. Either way, she still made the trip so it's not like it's a hoax in the same way that giant foot long 30mph camel spiders are. It sure is dishonest to assert that it was just her on the trip and that she was alone. There's a certain romanticism in the idea of a lone person in an isolated and deserted poisoned land traveling and documenting the journey, but it would have been just as interesting if it were she and her husband from the get-go.

      I do remember her site and there was never a mention of a husband or anyone else going along with her. In fact, as I recall she quite clearly asserted that it was a solo trip (and one of many to the area).

      At any rate, I'm still eager for the chernobyl based first person shooter coming out! (I forget its name).

    7. Re:More interesting route. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Me too :)

    8. Re:More interesting route. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I just wish I'd patented it - but Real Genius only goes so far, you know.

    9. Re:More interesting route. by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Route 66 would be cool, but unfortunately large tracks of it (primarily between Arizona and Oklahoma, from what I remember) no longer exist.

      I remember a book that was funded by the WPA (I think -- I haven't seen the book in years) that documented the highways of Texas as they existed in the 1930s, including landmarks (drive 0.3 miles west and turn left at the red barn). Imagine if the technology had been in place to put frame-per-second camera on cars and document the highways of the time on film. In fact maybe we should do something like this now. Our cities and highways will probably look as quaint and antiquated to the people of 2074 as the highways of 1934 look to us.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    10. Re:More interesting route. by mikael · · Score: 1

      Didn't DARPA sponsor a research project where every 100 metres of freeway was photographed and archived onto a video disc, with the goal of preparing military drivers to know the route before actually driving a heavy load between destinations?

      Maybe that would have route 66 on archive?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:More interesting route. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Double-check your link. The photos were real, she just didn't go alone, is all.

    12. Re:More interesting route. by agent2187 · · Score: 1

      You're joking right? You must not have driven much of Route 66. That drive makes me want to shoot myself!

    13. Re:More interesting route. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Hate to break it to you, but most of Elena's trip has now been definitively been proven to be a fake, specifically the part where she actually rides through Chernobyl on her bike. She (her husband? can't remember) also apparently re-arranged some kitsch to make a better shot.

      The trip was NOT faked. The only misleading element was the intimation that she rode it alone.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:More interesting route. by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of when I went from Maryland to Arizona to go back home after visiting my parents. I wanted to see what Route 66 was like so I started driving on it... I went a couple miles, picked up some speed, was really enjoying it (right besides I-40...) then suddenly it just ended! LOL

      I've never seen a Jeep Grand Cherokee slide to a stop so fast :P No signs, nothing.. just.. ended...

      I-40 was the replacement for Route 66... it runs pretty much parallel to it.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    15. Re:More interesting route. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I drive a USPS truck on Route 66 every fucking day.

      Makes me want to shoot other people.

      (Just kidding, of course.)

    16. Re:More interesting route. by tigersaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about anyone else, but I started to get a bit woozy once he got to Oregon, and 5 starts to actually have bends in the road. I think if anyone tried this on 95, it would darn near impossible to watch. I'd rather see 90, and attempt to pick out Wall Drug signs at Mach 9.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, all our base are belong to you!
    17. Re:More interesting route. by makohund · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah. I've done that trip (Salem to LA & back) and it'd dead boring.

      However, I've taken 101 all the way from LA to Lincoln City, then over to Salem. Much more interesting. The stretch of Oregon coast between Florence and Newport is particularly gorgeous.

      I'd have to say I'd take I-5 over driving through S Dakota any day. Gawd. Nothing. Some Wall Drug signs for mild amusement, but that's it.

      Now if I were to do something like this and had to pick a highway... without a doubt, the AlCan. The Alaska-Canada highway was one of the longest and most beatiful drives I've ever been on. Beat the hell out of Oregon to Georgia & back.

    18. Re:More interesting route. by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      Nope, not true. There's a statement from the tour guide elsewhere that states that she moved around items in order to take pictures - instead of a shot with a picture frame on its side, supposedly fallen over from a stampede of Chernobylees leaving the city, she put it there. Also, you can't ride motorcycles through Chernobyl.

      So, the only part of her trip that was actually *true* was her taking a few pictures of buildings, pictures that couldn't be faked. The rest - a motorcycle trip that was taken alone through Chernobyl in order to capture the city as it really is on film - is a lie.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    19. Re:More interesting route. by CodeSniper · · Score: 1

      Or you could do it on I-94 across North Dakota, 5 minutes of flat, straight road at mach 9

    20. Re:More interesting route. by kchayer · · Score: 1
      Now if I were to do something like this and had to pick a highway... without a doubt, the AlCan. The Alaska-Canada highway was one of the longest and most beatiful drives I've ever been on.

      Wouldn't you know, my wife and I just got back from that trip. We drove from Anchorage to Edmonton in three days, spent two and a half days at the West Edmonton mall (argued as the largest shopping mall in the world--it has an indoor amusement park, water park, ice skating rink, lake with scuba diving and submarine rides, and 800 shops/services--a wonderful place). We drove back in three more days.

      We spent a total of 71 hours and 39 minutes in our vehicle driving (not counting stops for gas), drove exactly 4015 miles, and since we tent-camped and shopped for motel bargains, the whole trip came in at around a grand. We still ate out tons, bought a few souvenirs, a new tent, and some other stuff. Not a bad bargain for a fun vacation, and the Alaska Highway is a really pretty drive.

      We also saw tons of wildlife, all from the road: bears, moose, elk, caribou, deer, a wolf chasing a lynx, bison, bald eagles, dall sheep, and a stray dog. Along the boardwalk at Liard hot springs, a small marmot scared the crap out of my wife. :)

      On the way back, I saw a bumper sticker I couldn't pass up: "I drove the Alaska Highway--both ways, dammit!"

      --

      "I say consider this day seized!" -Hobbes
      "Tomorrow we'll seize the day and throttle it!" -Calvin
    21. Re:More interesting route. by makohund · · Score: 1

      Sounds great.

      We started in Salem w/a caravan of vehicles. (Dad purchased some property along the Susitna & we were going to build a big cabin. Bringing all the materials & tools with us!) A big flatbed truck, an old motorhome pulling a flatbed trailer, and a camper van pulling a jet boat. (A workhorse, not some ski boat or anything.)

      Took 7 days to get to Wasilla. Then we chartered a barge to meet us at Deshka Landing & everything but the vehicles went on it. Following w/the boat it took a few hours to get down the Susitna river to a smaller river, and we went up that one all the way to the lake property. That leg woulda taken about an hour, but the BARGE BROKE DOWN. We towed that damn barge up this winding river (only barely wide/deep enough for the barge) with a jet boat, and a few guys with long poles trying to keep us from running aground on one side, then the next.

      I'll just say that jet boats were never meant to tow anything big and heavy. :)

      After 6 weeks camped out, the three of us finished building, & headed back in just the motorhome. Took 5 days, and a nasty blizzard followed us all the way from AK to the Washington border. Jeez.

      The trip up was one of the prettiest drives I've ever been on. The trip back was pretty too, but I spent about half the time scared outta my mind. (Going down a steep, narrow, hairpin twisting grade on 2 inches of solid ice with crazy wind gusts and snow blowing everywhere... all while glancing nervously over the edge of an immediate 1000+ ft sheer drop into a rocky/snowy canyon on our right. That's what I remember most. Oh yeah, forgot to mention the big trucks coming the other way that own the road, period, and take however much room they need... lanes be damned. Whatcha gonna do, complain to the cops? They don't exist out here!)

      Ah, it was great fun. Sometimes freaky, but I'd do it again in a minute. :)

    22. Re:More interesting route. by kchayer · · Score: 1
      That's what I remember most. Oh yeah, forgot to mention the big trucks coming the other way that own the road, period, and take however much room they need... lanes be damned.

      I forgot to mention the flipped-over big rig we saw on the way back. We were cruising along later in the evening, about a half-hour away from Toad River, when this dude blows by us in a pickup. We were riding along the section of mountainous road where the trees aren't cleared back so far from the road shoulder (what shoulder?) like most of the highway. So visibility wasn't great, and anything could pop out of the woods and you wouldn't have any chance to react.

      Five minutes later, down at the bottom of a hill and around a curve, beyond the twisted up and torn out guard rail, we spotted some sort of wreck still smoking at the bottom of the ravine. After stopping around the corner, I jogged up the hill to check it out. (I didn't want to leave someone dying in the middle of nowhere.) It turned out to be an 18 wheeler on its back. The rig was completely burned up, the trailer was basically shredded to pieces, and the whole mess was still smoldering. It was the kind of wreck where you said to yourself, "No way anyone could have survived that if they rode the truck down." There were no skid marks on the highway.

      Once we got to the lodge and got gas, we were talking to another trucker to find out what happened. Apparently, a couple days before, the guy was cruising down the hill, came around the corner, and swerved to avoid a moose. The road caught his rig and took him over the edge. At some point on the way down, he had the good sense to jump out. He broke both of his legs, but he lived.

      We slowed down and took it easy the rest of the trip.

      --

      "I say consider this day seized!" -Hobbes
      "Tomorrow we'll seize the day and throttle it!" -Calvin
  8. makes the trip a mere 6 minutes long by skimitar · · Score: 5, Funny

    About as long as the life-expectancy of his server

  9. and down we gooo by mastergoon · · Score: 1
    Best slashdot effect ever :)

    I hit the link before first comment, got on the download, 100K/s and all the sudden whoosh it starts dropping.

  10. Torrent link by redhat421 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find a torrent for the big video 2004Apr23_trip.torrent

    1. Re:Torrent link by Bill_Royle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a former Oregonian, I'll bite and seed it for a while too :) I will say though that only a masochist would pimp a file that big on Slashdot... of course, you knew that from the 50 other comments here!

      Way to go - fun experiment!

    2. Re:Torrent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks man!

      I'm seeing 178 leechers and 1 seed... gah. 2.4% done after about 5 minutes. Come on, folks, let's get this torrent going! Will leave my BT client (Burst) running overnight.

    3. Re:Torrent link by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I already downloaded the file earlier, but just added myself to your torrent as a peer. Hope it helps.

    4. Re:Torrent link by Entropy+Unleashed · · Score: 1

      Quick, let's start a pissing contest about our respective share ratings! I've uploaded about 6 and half copies so far. Anything less than unlimited speed/connections is unacceptable. 20 uploads or bust!

      --

      "I would give my right hand to be ambidextrous."
    5. Re:Torrent link by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Doh! I meant to say "as a seed".

    6. Re:Torrent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he really ment pee-er. As in pissing contest ;)

    7. Re:Torrent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've opened up my ports. Lot of clients connecting! Nice thing is I'm finally maxing out my incoming connection. Too bad we can't mirror the rest of the internet this way...

    8. Re:Torrent link by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      Torrents fucking rule. Slashdot shouldn't have an automatic mirror system for pages, but an automatic mirror/torrent system for big enough movies would be a big help.

      Anyway, over 700k a second down here. Sweet.

    9. Re:Torrent link by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      [8:05:34 AM] Starting 2004Apr23_trip.torrent
      [8:08:53 AM] Finished 2004Apr23_trip.torrent

      Max Down: 404.44 kB/Sec
      Average Down: 312.36 kB/sec

      BitTorrent is definitely THE anti-slashdot-effect.

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    10. Re:Torrent link by pseudochaotic · · Score: 1

      Wow. Right now i'm connected to 5 peers, with over a hundred seeds seen recently. Doesn't seem like there's a lot of point in seeding this one.

      --
      And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
    11. Re:Torrent link by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      I *just* clicked on the link.

      DL Speed: 175K/sec. ...

      300K/sec. ...

      In the time it took me to write this post, I've gotten 50%.

      Masochist? More like Superhero.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  11. Pretty groovy... by N473 · · Score: 1

    Watched the vid... noticed he drives like me, always in the left lane speeding past most others. Reminds me of my at least bi-weekly drives from El Paso to Albuquerque, except I do not stop when I drive.

    1. Re:Pretty groovy... by acceber · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As somebody who lives outside the US, the video was interesting for a number of different reasons.

      Americans drive left-hand drive cars and drive on the right hand side of the road. I had to take travel sickness tablets after watching that.

      Having never been to America, I now have an insight to what the scenery from LA to Oregon is like.

      The roads are a lot wider? Is that because the US has bigger cars?

      I think I shall drive from Sydney to the Gold Coast in Brisbane and do the same thing to compare and contrast with that video. Although I doubt the scenery would be as interesting as the route follows the coastline.

    2. Re:Pretty groovy... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well the roads are a lot wider because they do have pretty much a whole continent to themselves, and only about 260 Million people to populate it with. Some people have all the luck. Try driving in India. 1/4 the area of USA, and 4 times the population, and yes, they do own cars in India.

    3. Re:Pretty groovy... by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Now, I'm no expert in geography, but the grandparent sure sounded Australian to me. And, come to think of it, Australians really do have "a whole continent to themselves". Having done at least a little driving in the US, but never visited Oz, I'd sure appreciate such a video from down under. Bring it on! :)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    4. Re:Pretty groovy... by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      Yer right, they do, the Smallest Continent to be precise(or Largest Island, take your pick), but I think there's a lot less 'motorable' area in Oz. As for that video, I second the motion!

    5. Re:Pretty groovy... by kfg · · Score: 1

      The roads are a lot wider? Is that because the US has bigger cars?

      No. It is because they are designed and built for freight trucks.

      KFG

    6. Re:Pretty groovy... by DZign · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yep, as a European I also appreciate this movie.. gives you a better idea how it looks like somewhere else.

      Same thing with the other /. post last week of a truck driving through the USA to take pictures of every street. Would be cool if it got online so everyone could access it.

      Some people I email with have sent me links to sites of local newspapers and things like that
      so at least I have an idea of how their town looks like and what's going on.

      Because if you live in a city or in a heavily populated country in Europe, it's easy to think everyone lives in a city..
      Quite difficult to understand that someone lives in the middle of nowhere or in a very small town..

    7. Re:Pretty groovy... by st1d · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um, nice thought, but they're built that way because the folks at the pentagon set the standard. City roads (Detroir in my case), can be tiny, hazardous little lanes, but interstates have to be able to move certain equipment in times of emergency. Blame it on WWII, the Cold War, or terrorism. Interstate lane sizes (and those state roads that want bases nearby) are determined by the largest equipment the military is willing to move in a hurry. Obviously, having one 30 ft wide lane wouldn't appeal to the citizens, but having 3-4 M1A1*s cruising at highway speeds is a reasonable alternative.

      Not that we'll ever need it, but hey, they might end up a legacy like those old roman roads you European folks are so proud of. :)

      --
      Microsoft has just released their much anticipated hands-free cordless mouse. Warning, it may hurt a little at first.
    8. Re:Pretty groovy... by lewko · · Score: 5, Interesting
      In the Northern Territory (central Australia towards the top of the country) most areas outside major towns have no speed limit posted on the highways simply because the distances are so large, and there are so few other vehicles.

      There's something really cool about driving at 160kmh, seeing a highway patrol car and freaking out that you are busted until he overtakes you at 180kmh and waves...

      The bad news is that if you are a long way from somewhere when your car overheats and breaks down, you will probably die.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    9. Re:Pretty groovy... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I never said that the freight trucks weren't military in purpose.

      KFG

    10. Re:Pretty groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh just admit you didn't know. You'll still be a respected poster on Slashdot. Sheesh. :P

    11. Re:Pretty groovy... by kfg · · Score: 1

      What I know I don't know I admit perfectly freely I don't know. It just happens that I'm perfectly aware of the genesis of America's interstate highway system and its raison d'etre, including the fact that the major highway whose terminus I live proximate to was in part a subterfuge to hide the fact that they were building a linear accelerator underneath it for military research purposes (and invade Canada if it came to that. We prepared for damned near any contingency in the 50s and 60s)which I regularly observe being used for military purposes.

      So there's no reason for me to claim otherwise.

      I answered the person's question in the shortest, truest, and but simplest terms, attempting to not get into a big deal over it.

      Which I have. :)

      KFG

    12. Re:Pretty groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Runways for aircraft also. Close one side of the interstate, knock down a few raod signs, instant runway. That is part of the reason that a certian amount of interstate is straight.

    13. Re:Pretty groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The roads are a lot wider? Is that because the US has bigger cars?

      I think I shall drive from Sydney to the Gold Coast in Brisbane and do the same thing to compare and contrast with that video. Although I doubt the scenery would be as interesting as the route follows the coastline.


      come on, you're in Australia...is a Commodore or Falcon not a big enough car for you. Secondly, the Gold Coast is not in Brisbane, it's near Brisbane, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Pretty groovy... by ryanmfw · · Score: 0

      Also, the DoD wanted to be able to easily convert interstates into airports, in case the Russians nuked all of the big ones.

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    15. Re:Pretty groovy... by martinX · · Score: 1

      Loved riding the Kawasaki at 180 km/h in the territory. bummer slowing down to 60 in towns.

      beware of wedgetail eagles!

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    16. Re:Pretty groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you swallow a thesaurus or something?

    17. Re:Pretty groovy... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > I think I shall drive from Sydney to the Gold Coast in Brisbane.

      Great. 8 minutes of video, 3 of which are being stuck in traffic jams caused by roadworks on the Pacific Highway. :)

    18. Re:Pretty groovy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you are on the Canning Stock Route or something, maybe you would die. On the major roads in NT and WA there is enough traffic that someone would stop for you.

      I rode my bicycle around the circumfrence of Australia (20,000 km) in 2002-2003 and never once did I feel like I was alone. Even on the Gulf Track across the top from Normanton->Burketown->Borroloola I was seeing a car once every hour. I had these reserverations intially about biking for days on end and not seeing a car, but I found this to not be the case.

      My travel website is here:
      http://www.lunky.com

    19. Re:Pretty groovy... by arkane1234 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Americans drive left-hand drive cars and drive on the right hand side of the road. I had to take travel sickness tablets after watching that.

      Umm.. the guy was driving on a single-direction highway, with a camera mounted to the front of the car in a neutral location. It doesn't matter if the driver is inside of a gyroscope spinning around, flicking buttons continuously to make the car go, it's going to be the same view. Just imagine the drivers in the right-hand side, then your sickness tablets will be saved.

      The roads are a lot wider? Is that because the US has bigger cars?

      No, it's basically to allow you more cushion between you and your neighbor on the road. It allows us to get from point-A to point-B without superficial damage to our vehicles. Nevermind the fact that the view was of a major interstate highway that carries commercial traffic also. Aussie cars are the same size as American cars relatively.. hell, I have an Aussie-built car sold in both Oz and America and made in Adelaide, I should know.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    20. Re:Pretty groovy... by CentaurisII · · Score: 1

      So you drive a Mitsubishi Magna??

      I think that was the only Adelaide-built car to make it to the 'states.

      Incidentally, I think the wide roads are a perception of how low the camera is to the ground.

      As an Australian (living in Brisbane), I have also spent about a year in the US, and have travelled a lot of the Interstate network between Los Angeles and the San Ysidro border.

      I-5 between Los Angeles and the CA 78/I-5 merge
      I-15 between Escondido and Temecula
      I-405 (San Diego Fwy) between LA and San Diego
      I-805 (I think) from San Diego to the Tijuana border.

      The US Interstate system is not much different from the M-1 between Brisbane and the Gold Coast, lane widths are about the same. Actually, I have webcam-hooked-to-laptop footage of Gold Coast to Brisbane, but it's too crappy to put online.

      Maybe I'll re-do it one day ;-)

    21. Re:Pretty groovy... by kfg · · Score: 1

      did you swallow a thesaurus or something?

      No, I simply learned some small part of a language. You might want to try it sometime, it can come in handy.

      Unless all you need to say is "wood u lik fries wit dat?" or something.

      In which case you may be excused.

      KFG

    22. Re:Pretty groovy... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Having never been to America, I now have an insight to what the scenery from LA to Oregon is like.

      Actually, I think that a lot of Americans got a small glimpse of what other parts of their own country look like. It seems like a common theme on Slashdot is that we should all be taking public transportation for regular travel, but this is a pretty strong visual reminder that large parts of America are mostly empty. Most Americans do not live in large cities, but city dwellers seem to comprise the majority on this site. Remember, folks, not all of us have a bus stop in front of our house. In fact, I don't think that my town even has a bus.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    23. Re:Pretty groovy... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      No, it's not.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    24. Re:Pretty groovy... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      The roads are a lot wider?

      As others have pointed out, that's mainly due to military purposes. However, also remember that the most expensive part of a new road is the land under it. It's not much more expensive to build a 12 foot lane than a 10 foot lane if you've already paid for the right of way, ground studies, permits, and all of the other relatively fixed costs of the project.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    25. Re:Pretty groovy... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I drive a Mercury Capri XR2.. they were made from 1991 to 1994 there.

      I think your right about the perception of a wide road being from the low viewpoint.. it reminds me of just about every highway west of the rockies.

      I've travelled that path.. I have to say it's pretty much mundane, and normal. Well, once you get out of Los Angeles :)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    26. Re:Pretty groovy... by FartingTowels · · Score: 1

      I just returned from Down Under and did exactly what you plan - drove from Sydney to Gold Coast. With a few exceptions, the scenery is dull as road goes a bit inland so you cannot see the ocean. Roads are narrow and two way for most of the time. Fun nevertheless! I'd do it again.

    27. Re:Pretty groovy... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Meh, I don't think it was a particularly good example of the scenery in California or Oregon. The video shows mostly numpers of other cars, and the road. I think the only feature I recognized was Mt. Shasta in northern Cali. You couldn't see features like the pretty resvours or forests much, he would need a camera facing to the side for that.

      I'll see if I can do a caption of the route with features I can identify later. Here's a map of the route. He took I-5, the route with the blue shield labeled '5' from Los Angeles to southern Oregon.

    28. Re:Pretty groovy... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      That's hilarious!
      Flamebait for telling the truth ahah...
      It's fun coming back to see how vindictive moderators are ;)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  12. So... by DoktorSeven · · Score: 1

    when's the "Extended Edition" coming out?

    --
    This is a sig. Deal with it.
  13. Re:Obligitory joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't own a Land Speeder you Insensitive CLOD!
    followed by
    In Soviet Russia, the Video captures YOU!

  14. Greetings poster by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdotting yourself and posting a 65Mb AVI?

    You must be new around here.
    Or just really needing your ISPs love and attention ...which I'm sure you'll be getting by morning.

    Anyway, it was nice knowing you and all.

    1. Re:Greetings poster by marshall_j · · Score: 1

      You did read the isp ad at the top right? ;)

    2. Re:Greetings poster by mog007 · · Score: 1

      VROOOOOOOOM!

      In the beginning there was speed.

      SCREEEEECH!

      Now there's a wrecked server... we're talking serious momentum for a car travelling at 9 times the speed of sound.

  15. Wow.... by JoeLinux · · Score: 0

    in the 3 minutes it said that it was gonna take to down this initially, I went from 273 kB/s to 101.

    Go /.!

    1. Re:Wow.... by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1
      in the 3 minutes it said that it was gonna take to down this initially

      You miss read it. The 3 minutes referred to how long it was going to take to down his server not that small 65Mb file you wanted. Looks like the down calculation was correct ;)

  16. Slow day by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And this is news? Maybe if somebody got that scramjet working, or if somebody built a huge open-air particle accelerator between the two locations... but this isn't even remotely interesting.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Slow day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then filter out funny posts

    2. Re:Slow day by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      It'a totally cool, and perhaps you have no life.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Slow day by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
      Actually if he has absolutley no life, he would not have made the trip in the first place.

      Instead he would have created it from snapshots of the trip someone else took he downloaded off of google images.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
  17. Re:Best Wey by mastergoon · · Score: 2, Funny
    This has to be the absolutlu best wey to get slashdoted. Hasnt Bittorrent teched us anything?

    It ain't done teached me nothin

  18. Sweet! by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always wondered how pissed the drivers that passed me were . . . Now I can know!

    1. Re:Sweet! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always wondered how pissed the drivers that passed me were . . . Now I can know!

      If he mounted the camera on the rear, we would probably see nothing but middle fingers :-)

  19. Slashdotted at Mach 9 by ryen · · Score: 1

    no videos of that I suppose? ; )

  20. Nice stress test by melikamp · · Score: 1

    65 Mb file download? Slashdot? If that works out, thumbs up to the DreamHost.

    1. Re:Nice stress test by zorbid · · Score: 1

      Provided it works, it's a smart and original ad.

    2. Re:Nice stress test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to see the guy's hosting bill at the end of the month! He's going to get nailed by very high bandwidth usage.

  21. The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total by Uplore · · Score: 1

    But the petrol cost $350.

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
    1. Re:The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Let us assume a slightly high average consumption rate of 30 mpg, over the 695 miles he would have only consumed ~23 gallons. And with your terrible (*sarcasm*, in Oz we are paying over AU$1 per litre, AU$4.50 per gallon) fuel prices at present of $2.20/gallon. That is only $50 worth of petrol...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    2. Re:The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total by Lxy · · Score: 1

      I hope he has a camera filming his server. His next video: Slashdotting at Mach6.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    3. Re:The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total by gphinch · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the nice pot-shot at LA. It isn't that bad a place jerk :P
      Los Angeles != Hollywood (which is that bad a place)

      --
      in bed.
  22. Re:Madness by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 0

    Talk about a dream server, the download is going faster than the torrent. It will become a very expensive hobby if you don't have an unlimited plan on your server

  23. Re:Obligitory joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, I'm still laughing at this one:
    Dialogue/Meme

  24. Poor guy, server just fried by caryw · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was going good...

    0K (wget dots) 0% @ 372.78 KB/s
    50K (wget dots) 0% @ 279.33 KB/s
    100K (wget dots) 0% @ 271.74 KB/s
    150K (wget dots) 0% @ 2.87 MB/s
    200K (wget dots) 0% @ 1.95 MB/s

    and then it fried....

    34850K (wget dots) 50% @ 74.18 KB/s
    34900K (wget dots) 50% @ 78.25 KB/s
    34950K (wget dots) 51% @ 60.83 KB/s
    35000K (wget dots) 51% @ 56.56 KB/s
    35050K (wget dots) 51% @ 46.64 KB/s

    Slashdot effect in action people... I'll post a BitTorrent if it ever finishes

    Ugh, had to do a find replace of all the ..........'s wget makes. Damn lameness filter

    1. Re:Poor guy, server just fried by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1

      It was going good...

      0K (wget dots) 0% @ 372.78 KB/s
      50K (wget dots) 0% @ 279.33 KB/s
      100K (wget dots) 0% @ 271.74 KB/s
      150K (wget dots) 0% @ 2.87 MB/s


      I think the obvious and important question here is who is your ISP, and who do I have to sleep with to get them to provide service in a non-top-50 market?

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
  25. Despite speeding it up 95x... by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 4, Funny

    The 5 is still boring as hell.

    1. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You Yanks have all the fun. I loved the vid! The sun was shining, there were lots of cars, hills, and fun things to see. This was a really nice slice of life from another part of the world. I would love to see videos from Hong Kong traffic, or races around other parts of the GINORMOUS United States.

    2. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, at least you can go 70 on it--how many freeways are there in this state that you can do that with?

    3. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Um, 75 in Cali and most of the rest of the USA. Oregon blows at 65 tops. Parts of AZ were talking 85. And if you think I-5 sucks... try I-10 through Texas. MAJOR arse sucking there. I've driven every mile of I-10 from Florida to L.A. and every mile of I-5 from L.A. to Seattle as well as most of I-95 from South Beach up the East Coast. Again, only I-10 sucked the most.

    4. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 1

      That post was a joke. I haven't even watched the video, given the current condition of the server.

      To those who may not understand the joke: Most Californians seem to consider I-5 -- specifically the part between Los Angeles and Sacramento -- to be the most boring highway in the state. It's 300 perfectly straight miles of nothing but farms and cows and maybe a farm or two.

    5. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the maximum speed in CA is 70.

      I agree I-10 in Texas sucks. I got pulled over there once for going 79 in a 75. That's right, four miles over the limit. The cop never gave me a ticket nor did he ever intend to. They were just randomly pulling cars over to look for drugs. I guess my California plates looked suspicious in the middle of Bush country.

      Not that I can really complain, since they didn't write a ticket or anything.

    6. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

      what about route 66 (God I hope that's it) from Nevada to east coast? Supposed to be one of the most deserted roads out there.

    7. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by bobrk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, next time take 101!

    8. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by OutRigged · · Score: 1

      75? I only wish we were so lucky in Illinois. 55mph top speed limit on highways. The flow of traffic is usually around 80mph, but still. :|

      --
      RaGe
      We're all just noise on the wires..
    9. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by cavebear42 · · Score: 1, Funny

      How Dare You
      a cow or two
      there are lterally 1000's of cows on the drive up I-5. That dive is 500 miles of fuck-all. I grew up at 2:48, little home town in the middle of it. I live in LA now and drive that 350 miles one way about once a month. Late at night you can start day dreaming and realize that you just missed the last 50 miles of nothingness yet nothing has changed. I love California and the farms here feed the world but definatly _not_ an interesting thing to watch.

    10. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by smclean · · Score: 1

      As a resident of South Kern county, I take offense at that! As far from Los Angeles to Grapevine is quite an interesting stretch, with Pyramid Lake, Tejon Lake, Frazier Mountain, the rolling hills near Gorman.

      I commute this stretch of highway daily (Frazier Park exit to Lyons Ave) He takes some interesting detours on Lyons Ave in Newhall, which is actually the street where I work.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    11. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by smclean · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but most of the 'boring part', the San Joaquin valley, is done on the 99 in the video.

      Only on slashdot, eh?

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    12. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      If you really want a good drive in the US, go to Montana. They have a speed limit now, which is a bummer, but the drive from Billings -> Bozeman -> Butte-> Helena is great. That's the same basic route Charles Kuralt used to go on about, as I recall. You can go to Great Falls too, from Helena, but it's not really worth the trouble.

    13. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Osty · · Score: 1

      75? I only wish we were so lucky in Illinois. 55mph top speed limit on highways. The flow of traffic is usually around 80mph, but still. :|

      Have things changed in Illinois? I haven't been back there for a few years (born and raised, but moved out to Seattle after school), and the interstate limits were increased to 65 in the 90s. Yes, the state routes and non-Interstate highways were still 55, but I could get pretty much everywhere I ever cared to go on 55, 72, 74, 57, and 70. 55 from St. Louis to Chicago, with stops at Springfield and Bloomington/Normal, 72 from Springfield through Decatur to Champaign/Urbana or from Springfield through Jacksonville out to the river, 74 from Champaign/Urbana to Bloomington/Normal and on up to Peoria, the Quad Cities, and 80 out to the west or from CU through Danville into Indiana and eventually Indianapolis, 57 from Chicago to Effingham through Champaign/Urbana and then onto 70 down to St. Louis. The only real difficulty is getting from Springfield to Effingham without going miles out of the way to stay on interstates. Have to take 104 or 29 down to Taylorville and Pana, then make a decision whether to go all the way over to Shelbyville and then down to Effingham, take 29 down to 70 and come back up, or go on the smaller roads through little places like Cowden and Beecher City.


      Driving out from Illinois to Seattle a few years back was a pretty fun trip. Once you get out of Illinois, the speed limit went up to 75, and by the time you get to the Dakotas, Wyoming, and Montana it's normally up around 85. Then it drops back down to 70 once you hit Washington, and then 60 as you get closer to Seattle (I haven't figured out why the Midwestern states prefer x5 limits, while the Western states prefer x0 limits).

    14. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by justzisguy · · Score: 1

      He must have driven the I-5 considering at 2:48 you see Westley (off the I-5) and at 1:41 you see Kettleman City/41 (also off the I-5). The 99 is also not hilly between the Grapevine and Sacramento. I used to commute weekly between Pomona & Fresno, and from what I can see, this is not the 99.

    15. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by t4k1s · · Score: 1

      When I was in Saint Louis, Missouri, I found it amazing that the top speed was 55 while the roads had five or six lanes on each side... I live near Germany, where on some highways there is no speedlimit at all.

    16. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      I've driven I-5 between the Bay Area and LA extensively, and he is definitely on I-5. As the poster before me responded, you can see the exit for Kettleman City clearly if you know to look for it. (I'm quite familiar with that stretch especially. You can't drive I-5 without knowing you are getting close to In-n-Out!) However, another clear sign is when he gets over the Grapevine. At the I-5/99 junction, you can see him move into the right lane and get onto I-5 northbound.

    17. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      Try driving up I-55 from St. Louis to Chicago. At least California has hills.

    18. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      No, if it were 99 he would have gone through Bakersfield a few seconds after the Grapevine (the point where the early hills disappear).

    19. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Montana.. I was there before there was a speed limit to speak of. I loved the sign coming in from Canada to Montan, Speed Limit: Reasonable and Prudent. Basically they wanted you to just drive safe. I found the average speed to be about 95mph for the faster drivers. It might still be 80 or 85 for the posted limit though.

    20. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by makohund · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. I did Oregon to Minnesota & back a few years ago, and took that route. The gorge in Oregon, The mountains in Idaho/Monanta etc were great. Too bad going through Dakota sucked all the fun out of it. :)

    21. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by smclean · · Score: 1

      I just checked and slowed the video down to frame by frame, he does get on the 99. You can see the characteristic pink and white flowers in the median. However, it looks like he then realized his error, that he had meant to be on 5 and not 99, and takes either 166 or 119 west to re-intercept I5.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    22. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      You can easily spot details in Stockton and Sacramento as he drives through them that are clearly I-5. The sound wall to the right in Stockton, the approach in Sacramento. I have an urge to slice and dice the video and see if I can find the place he stopped to eat and get gas north of downtown Sacto.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    23. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      I haven't been through North Dakota, but South Dakota was nothing but one huge ad for Wall Drug. Argh. At least the black hills region was nice. I stayed in Spearfish for a night. It's a nifty little town in the spring/summer.

    24. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by Patrick · · Score: 1
      As a resident of South Kern county, I take offense at that! As far from Los Angeles to Grapevine is quite an interesting stretch, with Pyramid Lake, Tejon Lake, Frazier Mountain, the rolling hills near Gorman.

      Dude. The drive from LA to Lebec might be OK, but once you get down the hill, around the split with 99, there is nothing for 300 miles. Harris Ranch and that's it. Kern County is about 100 miles, of which maybe 5 are interesting. At least you can drive it all at 80mph.

    25. Re:Despite speeding it up 95x... by smclean · · Score: 1

      Bakersfield is like 25 miles north of grapevine. I swear, check the video, he gets on 99. He stays in the left-hand lane Then he gets off on what I believe is 166 and goes west to I5, then goes north on 5.

      I drive this area all the time from Lebec to Taft..

      Sean

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  26. I thought the guy built a HYPERSONIC plane. by zymano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now that would be cool.

  27. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm helping by downloading it over and over

  28. LA to Oregon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    LA is a city, Oregon is a state. Did he go to a city in Oregon? Or did he go to the Oregon border, turn around, and go home?

    1. Re:LA to Oregon? by TyrelHaveman · · Score: 1

      I saw the site when it was still up, and if I recall correctly, it had a map that showed him going to somewhere in Oregon. And it said something about baseball camp or something.

    2. Re:LA to Oregon? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Informative
      LA is a city

      Actually, LA is a state, L.A. is a city. Then again, L.A. is more like a state of mind so maybe it was appropriate after all.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:LA to Oregon? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      L.A. is more like a state of mind

      Actually, it's more like a state of no mind.

      KFG

    4. Re:LA to Oregon? by Lurker+McLurker · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the place in Oregon he went to is less well-known than L.A. Which applies to everywhere in Oregon.

      --
      Mod parent up!
    5. Re:LA to Oregon? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1
      Yes, there is a lot of zen practice going on around here....

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    6. Re:LA to Oregon? by reidab · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like he came here to Ashland, probably got off at Exit 11...

    7. Re:LA to Oregon? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Touche. :)

      KFG

    8. Re:LA to Oregon? by dragondm · · Score: 1

      Yeh, looks like it to me too.
      (I used to live in Ashland, OR)

      --
      -- -- The Dragon De Monsyne
  29. 950 miles in 6 minutes by jlanthripp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like how I drive...

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:950 miles in 6 minutes by Temporal · · Score: 1

      I think it's funny how Bush's campaign seems to be suggesting that we should prefer a president who takes an extremist stance on every issue rather than one who weighs each issue in context and is willing to accept either side of the argument if the circumstances demand it.

    2. Re:950 miles in 6 minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, you mean someone that does nothing instead of taking action because he's too worried about polls.

  30. Question about his methods by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

    Quoth the article:
    To create the video I had to capture the entire movie (25 gigs or so), extract it to single frames with VirtualDub, delete 99 out of 100 of them (left 10,000 frames), color correct and...

    What's the purpose of removing so many frames? Just to reduce size further, or when speeding up something like this does dropping frames make it appear smoother or something?

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    1. Re:Question about his methods by ntrktv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Video = 30fps you have to drop frames to speed it up.

    2. Re:Question about his methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I also question his methods. There are quite a few options in VCRs for time-lapse captures, that take frames at a much-reduced rate.

      When I did this five years ago, I merely stuck a webcam in the dash and ran a laptop off a power inverter. It was interesting, but you never saw me post it on Slashdot. It was also no work, since I set the capture interval and was able to dump it directly into a video. So basically we all know this guy is just stupid.

    3. Re:Question about his methods by agent+dero · · Score: 1

      The human eye can only detect so many frames per second, when he takes out that many, it just leaves out the stuff we wouldn't be able to see anyways

      The limit on what we can percieve is 60 frames per second or something in that arena, you do the math.

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    4. Re:Question about his methods by JTMON · · Score: 0

      Not trying to troll seriously..because I say the same thing..but if you talk to gamers they somehow have miraculous eyes where gaming at the most fps is necessary and they will argue till they're blue that they can actually SEE a difference....I just think they are dumb imo

    5. Re:Question about his methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a hardcore gamer, but even I can tell you that 30 fps is way too slow.

    6. Re:Question about his methods by Osty · · Score: 4, Informative

      The limit on what we can percieve is 60 frames per second or something in that arena, you do the math.

      Incorrect. First off, the eye doesn't see in "frames per second". Second, 60 fps is well below the maximum frame rate our eyes can see (nobody has yet proven a maximum frame rate). For example, look at a CRT monitor at 60Hz and then one at 100Hz. I bet you can tell the difference (yes, Hz and fps are different, but they're similar enough for this discussion). If you can't, or won't admit that you can, you'll still know when you have crazy eye fatigue and neck muscle strain later. The same goes for flourescent lights at 60Hz.


      People make the mistake of saying that the eye can only see X frames per second (where X is 24, 30, 60, or what have you), when they mean to say, "It only takes X frames per second for the eye to discern motion," where X decreases as effects such as motion blur are added to the source media. 24 frames per second of a video game like Quake sucks horribly, but 24 frames per second for a movie is acceptable because the film camera picks up motion blur. That's also ignoring the fact that video games are measured in average frames per second (your 24fps Quake game is going to slow down horribly when you get multiple meshes and particles going). It's also horribly evident that 24fps is not nearly enough when you watch long horizontal or vertical pans in movies.


      Just because movies play at 24fps, or NTSC plays at 30fps (well, 29.xxx fps, and shown in half-frames for an effective 60Hz refresh rate), or PAL is at 25fps, or your LCD monitor happens to refresh at 60Hz doesn't mean that's all the eye can see. I'm also ignoring the more motion-receptive portions of your eye (peripheral vision), which you can play around with by looking at a CRT out of the corner of your eye. I bet you can even tell that a 100Hz CRT flickers by looking at it that way.

    7. Re:Question about his methods by JTMON · · Score: 0

      yes but my point is that hardcore gamers argue the human eye can see more fps than it can...and they do this to justify spending 500 bux on newest vid cards...laughable at best

    8. Re:Question about his methods by Osty · · Score: 1

      Not trying to troll seriously..because I say the same thing..but if you talk to gamers they somehow have miraculous eyes where gaming at the most fps is necessary and they will argue till they're blue that they can actually SEE a difference....I just think they are dumb imo

      Gamers don't have magic eyes, but perhaps you're the dumb one if you can't tell the difference between 30fps and 60fps. More importantly, gamers measure fps as averages, so even an average of 60fps can drop well below 30fps at times. If you add to that the knowledge that higher fps at lower graphical quality == acceptable (or better) fps at higher graphical quality, you'll realize that the search for the fastest (in terms of fps) video card is not so silly. Sure, my GeForce3 (yes, I'm not nearly at the cutting edge of video cards, but I was ~2 years ago when I bought the card :) can play Quake3 at 800x600 and no options in excess of 100fps, but that just means I can bump up the resolution and/or the graphic effects (more particles, geometry smoothing, higher level of detail, larger textures, etc) and still be able to play at a good framerate.

    9. Re:Question about his methods by JTMON · · Score: 0

      oh boy, were not talking the difference between 30 and 60, were talking idiots saying they can actually SEE 100+FPS!!!! That is what they are arguing...point is...you don't need a 500 dollar card to put all options high and get 60FPS...if YOU do then you need a computer tweaking course...

    10. Re:Question about his methods by JTMON · · Score: 0

      Wow so now a frequency measurement is equal to fps...ok wonderboy, then why not just up the refresh if it's close enough for your argument...fps is not soley determined by the video card..put your 500 dollar card in a p3 and watch it goto shit...

    11. Re:Question about his methods by Osty · · Score: 1

      you don't need a 500 dollar card to put all options high and get 60FPS...if YOU do then you need a computer tweaking

      For older games like Quake3 or Half-Life, you're absolutely correct. Let's see you put all graphic effects at high, with 4x FSAA and 8x anisotropic filtering at 1600x1200 in FarCry or UT2004 and see how quickly even a GeForce3 melts down. I guess if you don't mind playing your games at the same frame rate as a powerpoint slide deck, you could certainly do this. For everyone else, it's not going to cut it. A card that scores 100+fps on older benchmarks (cards these days are topping 200fps on Q3 benchmarks, and are CPU-limited at all but the highest of resolutions and FSAA settings) will be lucky to run an average 30fps on newer games unless you really lower the resolution and detail levels. 30fps average is simply not enough to be enjoyable (remember, average).

    12. Re:Question about his methods by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wow so now a frequency measurement is equal to fps...ok wonderboy, then why not just up the refresh if it's close enough for your argument...fps is not soley determined by the video card..put your 500 dollar card in a p3 and watch it goto shit...

      I didn't say that. I said they're comparable. If you want to be technically correct, frame rate and refresh rate are linked by vsync (ie, a monitor that can only do 60Hz will risk image tearing if you push your frame rate beyond 60fps. That's why any good game allows you to lock to vsync for a consistent frame rate, or take your chances and disable vsync waiting and just go for broke). In terms of what the eye can see, refresh rate and frame rate are similar in that you can still see jerky motion even at 60+ fps, and you can still see flicker at 60+ Hz.


      You're correct that there's a CPU component to video card performance. You certainly can put a $500 video card in a P3, though you won't use much of its potential. However, you are buying yourself a bit of breathing room so that you don't have to upgrade your video card next time you want to upgrade your CPU (why would you buy a $500 video card and not get a $100 CPU upgrade, though?).


      All else being equal (meaning a modern CPU, modern memory architecture like DDR or RDRAM (guh!), etc), a higher frame rate is better. If you have the money, go for the best out there. If you're on a budget, get the best card you can afford. If you want to play modern games, you're not really saving much by buying a $100 video card each year versus buying a $300-500 card every 2-3 years. Be my guest, go out and buy that GeForce4 MX card you've had your eyes on. Even my lowly original GeForce3 will beat that, and I paid less than $300 for that 2+ years ago.

    13. Re:Question about his methods by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is why he had to manually remove the frames. VirtualDub has tools to do that in-video without having to extract the frames then put them back again.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    14. Re:Question about his methods by JTMON · · Score: 0

      eww geforce? ATI all the way pal..gotta love they were wearing the crown before nvidia existed and now it's back and forth...and hmm some cheating going on by manufacturers...it's funny how I don't have these issues you describe with all settings maxed..yes it slows down if I'm measuring the fps but I do not see nor notice anything choppyness wise. Maybe if all the new games actually used all the features in the new cards (they don't) and they never usually do..the newest cards usually have features game makers don't even use until 2 years later...I believe there is even a story here about it. And yes, you DID say that Hz was close enough to FPS to compare them...I guess we just have to agree to disagree because I can point to just as many sources that say your theory is bunk as I'm sure you can to my point.

    15. Re:Question about his methods by Osty · · Score: 1

      And yes, you DID say that Hz was close enough to FPS to compare them

      Close enough to compare them in terms of what the eye can see. The statement needs to be taken in the context of my comment (what the eye can and cannot see at what frame rate or frequency), and not as a general statement saying that fps == Hz.


      I guess we just have to agree to disagree because I can point to just as many sources that say your theory is bunk as I'm sure you can to my point.

      I'll agree to that, but not quite yet. :) I still find it hard to believe that you can run something like FarCry at 1600x1200 4xFSAA 8xAF at a reasonable frame rate on anything but the very latest video cards (reference). Yes, I know that there's absolutely no reason why you would care to run at that high of a resolution, with those FSAA or AF settings, but this ties right back into my claim that "higher fps rates at lower resolutions/detail settings == at least playable fps rates at higher resolutions/detail settings". 15 frames per second at those settings on a Radeon 9700 is unplayable, compared to a somewhat-acceptable 33 fps for a GeForce 6800. At the lower 1280x1024 setting with the same FSAA and AF settings, the 6800 gets a very playable 44 fps while the 9700 is still unplayable at 23. Turn down the resolution or FSAA or AF and I'm sure the 9700 can still hold its own, as can a GeForce 3 (though much worse than the 9700), but that's not the point.

    16. Re:Question about his methods by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      What's the purpose of removing so many frames?

      So he could leave in the frames he wanted to leave in.

      It occurred to me that an experiment like this would be the perfect situation to work in weird frames or subliminal messages because everything's blinking by so quickly you can hardly (or not at all) make out individual frames. Remember Fight Club and family films at the movie theater? Anyhow, since I don't feel like trudging the thing frame by frame, I submit to other /.ers: closely examine the scene at some convenience store around the 5:26 - 5:28 time marks.

      N.B., I'm not saying he had ulterior motives in making the film (he should get help if he did), but it's something to think about, anyhow.
    17. Re:Question about his methods by lawpoop · · Score: 1
      I thought I heard on some science documentary taht the eye (or the brain, more precisely) does take individual 'shots' of eye data.

      So is there is not FPS for the eyes, how exactly do they work?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    18. Re:Question about his methods by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      That better be a woman. If not, there are laws about that kind of shorts on a man.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  31. FreeCache by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

    This guy should have used "FreeCache"

  32. Ads? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Maybe this is all a big marketing ploy?

    1. Send thousands of people to download a huge .avi

    2. Make sure your ad for a "great web host" is in plain text at the top of the page.

    3. Listen to the collective gasp as your site actually manages to keep up with the downloads (as of 11:20pm pacific)

    4. Profit?

    Of course the whole thing goes out the window if the server actually does crap out in about 5-6 hours when the east coast get's to work and collectively hits the download link in one giant spasm of excitement at the chance of seeing the %$&%-ing highway 5.

    weee?

    --
    If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    1. Re:Ads? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 1
      Whoops

      In the time it took to preview, correct some stupid spelling mistakes and then hit submit. My download crapped out, and now I can't connect again.

      Guess I should have left step three as ????

      That will teach me to proof read.

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    2. Re:Ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interstate not highway. Sheesh!

    3. Re:Ads? by Johnathon_Dough · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't know why I am bothering to an AC...but...

      For what it's worth, living in both LA and SF I almost never hear it refered to as "interstate 5" it is reffered to as either "highway five", or more often, just "the five".

      Actually, even more often it is referred to as "what? you mean I HAVE to take the fucking five!?"

      --
      If you are one in a million, then there are six thousand people who are just like you.
    4. Re:Ads? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      I live in LA and SF area.
      School in LA, home in SF bay.
      for what it's worth, I call it i5

      -Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    5. Re:Ads? by Cadrach · · Score: 1

      I have no idea how it's referred to in California, but I've never heard it called anything other than I-5 up here around Seattle.

      --
      Faith may be defined briefly as an illogical belief in the occurrence of the improbable. --H.L. Mencken
    6. Re:Ads? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      i think they should rename it 80+ tho, since everyone seems to drive that. well in centeral calif anyway.

      -grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    7. Re:Ads? by mrjeff3000 · · Score: 1

      I think the magic border is down around the Grapevine. North of there, freeways have names like I-5, I-80, and Highway 50. South, everything is "the 5" or "the 210".

    8. Re:Ads? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's the Norcal vs Socal thing. Socals like to append "the" before every freeway number. As a Norcal going to school in LA, it drives me nuts. A fellow transplanted Norcal summed it up best one time when I asked him how he drove home. He said he took "the 110 to the 5 to I-5 to 152 to 101."

    9. Re:Ads? by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could be. In Portland we call it I-5; I've never heard it called Highway 5 before.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    10. Re:Ads? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      i think they should rename it 80+ tho, since everyone seems to drive that. well in centeral calif anyway.

      If you're going to do that, though, they should also rename certain portions of it "dear god, what's that smell?" and "hoe much more california can there possibly be north of Sacramento?"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    11. Re:Ads? by anim8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny how local naming schemes evolve.

      For years I-5 was the only significant interstate in the Portland area. And everyone calls it I-5. As the population has grown we have built more interstates:

      I-205 runs from Tualatin through E. Portland and into Vancouver, WA. People just call it 205.

      I-405 runs from W.Portland to 205 in E. Portland. Most people call it The Banfield.

      I-84 runs from the I-405/I-205 junction in Portland thru eastern Oregon into Idaho and beyond. And it's commonly called I-84.

      So the old-timers have always prefixed the "I" onto the number because they were the only Interstates in town and it has stuck.

      Now, take LA and SF. They have so many interstates running through town that when talking with others about traffic routes the natural tendency is to strip syllables and give them names instead of numbers ... The Five.

      Someone oughta write a book.

    12. Re:Ads? by makohund · · Score: 1

      Same here in the middle. Us Oregon folks call it I-5, too.

      Let's see... up north it's I-5. Here it is I-5. I'm hearing a few different names down south, but I-5 is one of 'em. That's what my friends down there call it, too.

      So I think it's safe to call it I-5. Although "the fucking five!" kinda has a nice ring to it, too. :)

    13. Re:Ads? by spacemky · · Score: 1

      LA? C'mon! You should know it's THE 5. All roads here start with The. The 101, The 60, The 110, The 405. I've never heard it called I5 since I've lived in LA.

      --
      640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
    14. Re:Ads? by makohund · · Score: 1

      Thats a great observation, and appears to be correct. It think there's another bit to add, though.

      I think the "I-" designation sticks not only because they were the only interstates in town, but because they actually ARE interstates. In the true sense of the name. They aren't just interstates in the sense that they are large freeways that cut through town in various directions. They really are "true" interstates. They don't just stop or join something else at the edge of town... they actually go someplace else.

      Such as, for example... Washington. Idaho. California. Other states... hence the name interstate. ;)

      OK, I'll grant that 205 crosses the river. But it still won't take you beyond the general Portland/Vancouver area.

      I-5 and I-84 are the only interstates in town that can take you someplace far away. So they've earned the right to be called "I-". Or something like that. :)

    15. Re:Ads? by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Well, to combat the "smell", run the aircon.

      As for "how much calif is left"? Just remember. California is a "great state".

      -Gruml

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    16. Re:Ads? by mooman · · Score: 1

      I-405 runs from W.Portland to 205 in E. Portland. Most people call it The Banfield.

      Really? I'm pretty sure that I-405 is just the C-shaped loop that runs along the west side of downtown Portland. It's only a few miles long and so people just call it 405.

      The highway from I-5 (just across the Willamette from downtown) to 205 in E. Portland is really I-84, and that stretch of it is often called "the Banfield". I-84 continues from there to eastern Oregon/Idaho as you mention.

      --
      In the Portland, Ore area and like card games? Check out: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/portlandgames/
    17. Re:Ads? by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

      I'm from San Diego, Lived in LA and Klamath Falls, OR. Everyone I know calls it I-5. Seeing it on /. called "The 5" looks very strange to me, but I guess if on the occasion I don't use "I", I might say "the 5 freeway", so "The 5" is in there too. I just never thought of it that way.

      --
      Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    18. Re:Ads? by anim8 · · Score: 1
      Really? I'm pretty sure that I-405 is just the C-shaped loop that runs along the west side of downtown Portland. It's only a few miles long and so people just call it 405.

      You are correct. My bad. The Banfield bridge connects so seamlessly with 405 when I go up Sunset that I just think of the Banfield as 405.

      And to think I've lived in the Metro area all my life. Silly me.
  33. Bittorrent rocks the house. Re:Torrent link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Cool thanks for the torrent link, Hopes it not a virus. ;)

    Good speed, too. I'll leave my connection up all night too, just to be nice to my fellow slashdotters, and that poor fool and his website.

  34. The camera and VCR only cost about $50 total by Zardus · · Score: 4, Funny

    However, after the server exploded due to Slashdotting and started a huge fire resulting in the destruction of his house, the neighborhood, and most of LA, the total cost of the trip was estimated at 8.5 billion USD.

    --
    You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  35. I grew up in Medford by dangerweasel · · Score: 1, Funny

    There is nothing that would make me want to travel there at Mach 9. Take my word on this. For the love of God. Please.

    1. Re:I grew up in Medford by flyboy974 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I watched the end to see just how far he went into Oregon. I hate Medford too! Although my roommate's parents live by the Oregon Vortex and own a horse ranch. Grabbing a few horses and packing it out for a night or two is the only way to camp!

    2. Re:I grew up in Medford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol
      I'm in ashland right now, and amen brother...

    3. Re:I grew up in Medford by jalspach · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, where I grew up...Dunsmuir CA...we drove to Medford for fun! And listened to KTMT because we liked Charly and Dan-o and the Morning Zoo crew...(now where is my 'Nu Shooz' tape?)
      Ok so that was a long time ago (around 30 - 25 yesrs ago or so) but still...

    4. Re:I grew up in Medford by Kalrn · · Score: 1

      It could be worse... you could still live there!

      I grew up in Medford too. Went away for high school and college. Despite my best efforts I was unable to escape -- somehow I landed a programming job in Ashland.

      Once my threshold for pain was reached, I picked up and moved to Ashland. Medford's pretty bad for Ashland to look any better, that's for sure.

    5. Re:I grew up in Medford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Ashland right now at SOU. God why won't it end? I can't wait to get back to Portland, a city where everything DOESN'T close down at 5pm or smell like hippie.

    6. Re:I grew up in Medford by Kalrn · · Score: 1

      Heh, please don't tell me you're getting a degree in CS.

    7. Re:I grew up in Medford by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Southern Oregon is just dull in general. Eastern Oregon is great for Sunriver resort and camping, and northern oregon from eugene to portland is where you'll find the majority of the bigger cities. And whatever you do, stay away from the oregon coast.

    8. Re:I grew up in Medford by dangerweasel · · Score: 0

      What could really be worse than being "the Morning Zoo Crew" in Medford, Oregon? Maybe radical mastectomy surgery. But not much else.

  36. Dead/Toast/Kaput/Fried CPU yet? by Zrech · · Score: 0

    The links already dead..... too bad I wantd to see it. Anyone got a torrent link to it yet?

    1. Re:Dead/Toast/Kaput/Fried CPU yet? by Zrech · · Score: 0

      NM it works again now...

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Thanks... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    As pennance for taunting everyone below, I'll host it for a while as well. I still can't really host from here very well or I would have done that myself.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  39. Thanks by BitHive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I enjoyed watching your video. Thank you for making it!

  40. Re:Best Wey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't school taught us anything?

  41. Sign of the times on The Coast by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    In about 30 of the frames I could have sworn I saw geeks on the side of the road with "Will Code for Food" signs.

  42. SF - Redwood City at Mach 1 by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    Again - nice and easy to do with a Laptop and webcam, and about 12x normal speed - I'd post it on my site..... but this is slashdot after all.

    I'm not sure mach 9 is as watchable, it's certainly faster, but I kinda like the way I can pick out details at a simulated speed of 720mph

  43. Trés Super! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fantastic work and a very creative! This taps right into the zeitgeist, next to blogging and confluence finding whilst providing an accessible glimpse into another area of the world. Imagine if someone did one for a cruise down the Nile, or the Trans Siberian Railway. Thanks for posting!

    p.s. Don't listen to the nuts going on about download speeds and what not, some people can't see the forest from the trees.

  44. i've done this myself and I offer these tips by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I did this with my Canon ZR80 and got some good results using Vegas 4. I offer these suggestions to anyone who wants to try this themselves:

    Do not move the camera. Use a tripod. If you cant rig up a full size tripod in the passenger seat check best buy or similar stores for tiny desktop tripods. They work well when seated on the dash as long as you have something to keep them in place (duct tape).

    Cut out moments in post when your vehicle is not moving. I forgot to do this once and my video came to a 3 second hault as I reached an intersection. Needless to say it distracted from the video greatly and was truly annoying. Just trim it out so that it looks like you ran the red light or something and the video will continue to flow. This tip also goes for bumps or swerves as they look terrible at high speed.

    Do not add a blur effect in post production, or atleast not the ones that come with Vegas. They seriously distract from the video. If you need that light-speed look I suggest duplicating the video layer, moving the top one forward 2 or 3 frames and changing its opacity to 50%. This will create a cool effect especially when passing cars and changing lanes

    If you are going to mount the camera inside the car (which I highly suggest) make sure:

    A. Your windshield is clean

    B. Its not raining. I did this once with the windshield wipers on and it looked horrible

    C. Your state and county stickers are not in the picture. If the camera does move it will be much more noticable if there is a static image on the video.

    If you are going to tape more than an hour of driving you may want to setup a laptop on an inverter hooked up to the camera with firewire set to take an image every X seconds. You can then drag all of these into your favoriate post video production software but in my experiences you dont get as smooth an image unless you overlap the images with opacity fades and by that time its become one helluva project

    Tip for vegas: You can increase the velocity encelope up to 300% but thats not a whole lot. Do this alone with shortening the clip while holding down the CTRL key will allow for up to 12x the speed without the need to reencode.

    If you need to speed up the video faster than what your post video production software can do you can always render the video no or low compression, import the now rendered video and do it again. lather, rinse, repeat.

    And always:

    Mix it to good techno if thats your cup of tea

    I'm interested in hearing what other tips video enthusiast slashdoters have come up with. Please share.

    As always I apologize for the bad spelling and horrible formatting, I'm rushing to get to sleep

    BTW: This also works well for filming Ballroom Dancing. It looks hillarious and cool at the same time. Try overlaying multiple segments of the dance at different oppacities and adding a black and white or sepiatone filter and playing witht the white balance for a great ghostly look.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by schwaang · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you weren't maxed already I'd bump you +1.

      For fun I do time-lapse of relatively stationary stuff - like plants growing, where the speed-up really brings out patterns that you don't see at normal speed.

      Maybe that's why I actually liked the part in this video where he's parked at a gas station and you see some plants blowing in the wind, for a change of pace.

      Some issues are different when you're doing a time-lapse over 1 hour versus multiple days. But one thing that I've found useful for slow-changing stuff is if you're taking say 1 frame per hour of a macro subject outdoors that can easily blow in and out of focus, take two frames in rapid succession so you can throw the worst one away.

    2. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by Bazzargh · · Score: 1

      C. Your state and county stickers are not in the picture. If the camera does move it will be much more noticable if there is a static image on the video.

      Not that I know much about this... but surely having something static in frame - point-like, not too close to the camera - could be a good thing, it would allow easier image registration in post production? But then, I guess that's a whole heap more work.

    3. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by metamatic · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered what American football would look like if you removed everything except the actual football. Anyone tried it with the Superbowl? Maybe it would be interesting.

      Then again, probably not.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1
      BTW: This also works well for filming Ballroom Dancing. It looks hillarious and cool at the same time. Try overlaying multiple segments of the dance at different oppacities and adding a black and white or sepiatone filter and playing witht the white balance for a great ghostly look.

      sweet! now i can host my own 'swinging wake'! Is this room actually stretching................?
      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    5. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by msim · · Score: 1

      Another good site is www.bikemovies.com :-).

      ok there are some stupid things being done on turbo'd bikes, but still there are fast-forwarded trips through rural areas as well as other places.

      Me, i've got a camcorder, unfortunately it's a cruiser so is too nose-high to do this.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    6. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by tepples · · Score: 1

      CONFESSION: I do watch the Super Bowl, but only to tape the commercials.

    7. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: "Cut out moments in post when your vehicle is not moving"

      Actually I liked his rest-stops. The one at the gas station with the CALIFORNIA plate suddenly in your face I thought was memorable / artistic / a nice reality stamp.

      The Jack in the Box is a close second. Loved the sickening right turn onto the road. Wish he could have taken the 101 through SF though - and as much as I love the pacific coast highway - I'm certain that the curves would have been more vomit inducing that the benign curves in Oregon that were nearly as hurlsome (yes I was eating lunch at the time).

      good tech points - but I think there's a lot of creative decisions that conflict with some of them - intentional or not.

    8. Re:i've done this myself and I offer these tips by rhuntley12 · · Score: 1

      I've done some of this driving around town in Boise, Idaho. I think it's just really cool to do, just been too scared to put it up and watch the server crash and burn. Also was a bit curious about it showing other peoples license plates, doubt it matters but you never know. It's kind of a nerd thing I do when I look for Wifi...

  45. Re:Best Wey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wut iz skool Billy Ray?

  46. Freecache link by Lord+Prox · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Freecache link by ZenBased · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      http://www.virtualconcepts.nl/
    2. Re:Freecache link by claar · · Score: 1

      Nice mirror.. 430KBps to Kansas, USA! Thanks.

      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous...
    3. Re:Freecache link by Yert · · Score: 1

      Agreed... 280KBps to Memphis, TN, US.

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    4. Re:Freecache link by trawg · · Score: 1

      Phew, a working (and blisteringly fast) mirror.

  47. nice. by ozzmosis · · Score: 1

    but I think I almost had a seizure around minute 5 with all the turns in the road.

  48. If only... by Lakers · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a fellow geek that does this exact drive about 4 times a year, I must say that 6 minutes is extremely appealing.

    Many times during the monotony of the drive up I-5 I've wished I could teleport (even only 20 miles at a time). Mach 9 sounds just as appealing.

  49. Cross-Country video by JWSmythe · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that can't see the slashdotted site, our automatic mirrors have the page itself HERE. The backup site (listed on the page) still has the video available.

    I did the same thing driving with only one sleep stop from Florida to California. It ended up being rather boring. Lots of night driving where you could only see tail lights and reflectors, and plenty of "Road Runner" desert country. :)

    I shortened the whole 2500 mile drive down to 5 minutes, which was too much for most people to watch.

    I did a web broadcast for most of the drive, losing my Internet connection while driving through most of the South West US. It picked back up in the few major cities that I passed through, and that's when I got all the voicemails on my phone saying "Hey, your feed broke!" :)

    Most of the drive was rather quick. I got pulled over twice in Texas, where the cops were entertained to see a laptop in the passenger seat and a camera on the dash. Either of them asked why it was there, they just gave me a warning, and I went on my way. I really had the urge to tell the cops "My car can do almost 200mph, I'm doing 80mph, I want to go lots faster, there's nothing out here and no traffic!", but I held back to avoid an escort out of Texas. :)

    I got stuck in traffic going through San Antonio, Texas, which looked wierd on the video. Scenery was flying by, suddenly you saw the same minivan I was stuck behind for several frames. You could also see every time I stopped for gas, which lasted for just a couple frames.

    I made a run from LA to Salem Oregon and back, about a year ago. The drive took from Friday evening to Sunday morning. Again, it would have been a boring video. Most of Northern California was during the night, and Oregon was all under fog first thing in the morning when we arrived. I was in a rush, so we didn't get the laptop and camera set up for this one.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  50. Is There A Point by tonyr60 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is this a slow /. news da?. Sorry, but I just don't see how this justifies a story.

    1. Re:Is There A Point by tonyr60 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good. I enjoy a carefully crafted and thoughtfull response to a question.

  51. California 7A88404, Thats me! by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    California 7A88404, That was me!

    3:39 seconds in

    Is it just me or at the 5:00 point does it looks like he started speeding like a bat out of hell?

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

      i have to give a shout out at a drive i do 50% of once a month for the last 5 years. I live in LA and my parents line at 2:48.

    2. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by hummassa · · Score: 1

      All the time he was speeding, and he did a lot (more than a dozen) wrong (right-side) passings, mainly trucks. If I was from the DMV, his license would be history by now. (Right-side passing, where I live is a 5 point infraction... and you can only get 20 in one year before losing your license.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    3. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      I'll get back to you right after my epileptic seizure.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    4. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by gkwok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It probably only seems faster at 5m00s because the road becomes more twisty, and there are suddenly trees on both sides of the road. With more visual cues to reference, the eye believes it's going faster.

    5. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      So, does anyone know what CA is going to do in 3-5 years when that first digit rolls over?

      Just roll it to letters? Add another digit? Change colors? RFID tags? Barcodes?

      Personally, I'd like to get rid of the big, ugly numbers and replace them with something small and concealed.

    6. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So, does anyone know what CA is going to do in 3-5 years when that first digit rolls over?"

      Yes, one month before that happens, registering a new car will get really, really expensive, and people will start registering their cars in nevada.

    7. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Guess what, the digits won't roll over until we have more cars (and reserved vanity plates) than seven digit base-35 strings. (There's no 0 or no O depending on how you look at things - not sure what the official standpoint on that one would be. Probably no 0, as it's imaginary anyway, ho ho.) This is because license plate numbers can be reused. Also, CA can issue six digit plates as well for a little padding; many of them are still in use for old school black/yellow plates but not all of course - most of those plates are gone now. I think they probably take those numbers away if the car's registration has lapsed.

      The numbers on the back of the car are not going away. A lot of arrests result from citizens reporting plate numbers. They are also necessary for reporting gross polluters. And, finally, a cop on foot with no gear can still remember one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      >The numbers on the back of the car are not going away. A lot of arrests result from citizens reporting plate numbers. They are also necessary for reporting gross polluters. And, finally, a cop on foot with no gear can still remember one.

      RFID built into the chassis, and a city-wide tracking system (think lo-jack or a mod of the metricom/ricochet networking system), could be quite a bit more useful. All you'd need is cross-streets and a cellie, and you could say "the blue Impala at 4th and Figeroa just a minute ago". No need to be in position (or conscious) to catch the plate. Which any decent perp would have covered with the tail of a shirt slammed in the trunk anyway.

      Oh, and if you're thinking of complaining about privacy, remember, driving is a privilege, not a right, and your rights to be unidentified and not followed around while doing it are nil. So if you want to go somewhere anonymously, take the bus or walk there.

    9. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, and if you're thinking of complaining about privacy, remember, driving is a privilege, not a right, and your rights to be unidentified and not followed around while doing it are nil. So if you want to go somewhere anonymously, take the bus or walk there.

      It's only a matter of time before buses have face recognition and shoes all have RFID tags in the soles, and then your only option will be to stay in your house and order everything off the inter- oops, they'll track your purchases via credit card number.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:California 7A88404, Thats me! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It's only a matter of time before buses have face recognition and shoes all have RFID tags in the soles, and then your only option will be to stay in your house and order everything off the inter- oops, they'll track your purchases via credit card number.

      Credit card number? They're watching every keystroke and click, bubba.

  52. Cool Movie (!), but... by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 1

    ...too bad you had to waste it on I-5. If you have the chance to do it again, try Route 1 and US 101. They're much more scenic!

    1. Re:Cool Movie (!), but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of all the curves going up the coast on 101, though. It would be enough to make anyone seasick at mach 9.

  53. Way cooler.. by superhoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. are those flicks where somebody put up a camera to follow the building of a house, and then speeded the result it up by 200x or similar. That really cool to see a house 'grow' :) If anyone remembers urls to these flicks, post 'em in, I can't remember anymore..

    --

    -el

    1. Re:Way cooler.. by Tokerat · · Score: 2, Informative


      That's called "Time lapse photography", google for it, I'm sure there is plenty out there.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    2. Re:Way cooler.. by beeplet · · Score: 3, Informative

      The MIT Stata Center page has a link to their time-lapse webcam which captured the whole thing being built... I watched it for a while but it really wasn't all that exciting. Maybe with some editing (like taking out the night-time parts) it would have been more interesting to watch, but then I guess it would lose some of the authenticity...

    3. Re:Way cooler.. by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      This Old House has a huge collection of such movies. Remove the "site:thisoldhouse.com" and you'll find even more.

    4. Re:Way cooler.. by bozendoka · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that build a new corporate campus a couple of years ago. It got off to a slow start so as a joke during a department meeting they showed time lapse video of the construction - all you saw was the empty lot and cars blinking by on the highway as it went from day to night over and over. Got a good laugh.

      --
      "You will soon be more aware of your growing awareness." - My first recursive fortune cookie!
    5. Re:Way cooler.. by arunkv · · Score: 1
      flicks where somebody put up a camera to follow the building of a house, and then speeded the result it up by 200x or similar
      You can find these kind of videos at Playing With Time
    6. Re:Way cooler.. by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 1

      We've got a really nice Sony Network Camera on top of the building I work in, looking over at construction on a new genomics / bioinformatics lab. I've got a cron job that recenters the camera and grabs a frame a few times a day. Call me in about a year, and I'll have a video for you!

      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
    7. Re:Way cooler.. by SamSim · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a similar movie that was in a more scenic part of the world, Europe maybe. America may rock and all, but the west coast sure looks to be a big, yellow space...

      On an unrelated note, what is the music he used? It sounded pretty good.

    8. Re:Way cooler.. by Juggle · · Score: 1

      Not a house but I know someone who did a time-lapse building their car:

      http://sandcars.net/gg.mpg

      Well, ok it's a long travel sand rail and not a street legal car but having built two myself and knowing how many months it took me watching the whole thing happen in a few minutes is pretty impresive.

      --
      --- Juggle juggle@hitesman.com
  54. What right lane? by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    Until you hit the Oregon border, and then the style of driving seems to be to stay in the left lane in a huge-ass motorhome going as slow as a slug, and the right lane might as well not even exist. Even though the state puts up huge green billboards advising "slow traffic keep right" you can bet your last dime you'll be stuck in the left lane behind a smoke-belching deisel-powered house-on-wheels chuffing along at 45 MPH all the way to the Columbia.

    1. Re:What right lane? by Markus+Registrada · · Score: 1
      The state doesn't put up those "slower traffic keep right" signs. The auto club buys and places them, with the cooperation of the state.

      I once drove from Portland to Seattle (~200 mi) and averaged 90 mph, including driving at the speed limit (55, then) through the speed traps. Of course I had to go over 100 mph the rest of the time to make up the difference...

  55. Re:Thanks WHAT?! by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I enjoyed watching your video. Thank you for making it!

    [sarcasm]
    This is /. you are not supposed to THANK anyone for doing anything useful/creative/interesting with technology you are supposed to bitch/complain/nit pick. Now get with the program.
    [/sarcasm]

  56. Well, you could use the New England highway... by GrahamCox · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..instead. It would be a more interesting route as you have to climb then descent the Great Dividing Range, and it's actually shorter than the Pacific Highway. Just a thought! Oh, and stop off in Armidale while you're at it and spend some tourist dollars ;-)

    1. Re:Well, you could use the New England highway... by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      ...it's actually shorter than the Pacific Highway.

      I think you meant the Pacific Coast Highway aka PCH, which is actually US Highway 101. He drove Interstate 5. For any long drives on the Pacific coast, I-5 is almost always going to be faster.

    2. Re:Well, you could use the New England highway... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      No, he meant the Pacific Highway.

      He's in Australia... other side of the Pacific... and its the original goat-track that follows the east cost of Australia from Melbourne to somewhere way up north in Queensland.

    3. Re:Well, you could use the New England highway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The New England Highway is 1000km+
      The Pacific Highway is 900+km

      And considering he wanted to go to the Gold Coast, the Pacific would be even shorter (You go past the Gold Coast to get to Brisbane). Pacific would be at least 2 hours shorter if not more.

      I've been both ways to Sydney (I live in Brissie), now that they've upgraded the Pacific (And its no longer a death trap), its my preferred way. I only miss the stop over at Stanthorpe (and Girraween national park).

  57. ROAD TRIP by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, now if you slow it down, you can find out exactly where he lives! Turn at the white fence!

    First one there, MOBLOG IT!

    GO!

    1. Re:ROAD TRIP by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's only 8h on a plane. Plus several more to the correct state. Assume 4h being there.... Yes, I guess I could make it back in time for saturday.

  58. An even better route Sydney to Brissy... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    Sydney -> Newcastle -> Hexham ->Raymond Terrace -> turn left off onto (Bucketts Way) -> Stroud -> Gloucester -> (Thunderbolt's Way) -> Nowendoc ->Walcha ->Uralla -> TR onto (New England highway) -> Armidale -> Guyra -> Glen Innes -> Tenterfield ->(QLD border) -> Warwick, etc, etc.

    The route up from the pacific highway through Gloucester is spectacular - I'd love to see that at 95x speed! And it'll save you several hours over the other main routes because a) it's a straight line and b) there are very few cars and no cops.

    1. Re:An even better route Sydney to Brissy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I took that route on a bicycle at the start of March. There's an excellent camping site at Nowedoc-- which almost made up for the 30 kms of steep hills...

    2. Re:An even better route Sydney to Brissy... by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      I used to live in Raymond terrace...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    3. Re:An even better route Sydney to Brissy... by little_fluffy_clouds · · Score: 1

      I always wondered the best way to go inland - is this the same route you would take brisbane to sydney, or is it slightly different?

      I've only ever taken the coast road straight down and into paramatta - egads.

      --
      What were the skies like when you were young?
  59. Hope to see it as soon as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the /. effect passes away. This reminded me of that movie, The Rendezvous (http://www.chasecam.com/rendezvous/automobilerevi ew.html), which consists of mothing but a uncut shot of a speeding car traversing the city of Paris.
    Time lapse video is way cool. I've captured stunning videos of clouds, sunsets, etc., with a Firewire camera, a very long cable, and the BTVPro software on OSX. It lets you specify framerate of capture, so you don't need to actually tape hours and hours. Also useful for stop-motion animation.

  60. He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You made a good joke, but having watched the video, the guy does appear to be a very impatient driver. Time after time after time, he runs right up to someone's bumper in the left lane, follows very closely for some time, then winds up passing them on the right.

    I spend a lot of my time doing interstate driving. As such, I realize that there are plenty of assholes out there doing 65mph in the passing lane where the speed limit is 70. But drivers who tailgate in the passing lane (or any lane, really) are IMO just as much of a risk for accidents.

    When you're in the far left lane, and you're gaining quickly on the car in front of you, you should either move to the immediate right lane and complete your pass at a safe distance, or if conditions don't allow this, slow the fuck down and back it off. Riding the bumper of the person in front of you because they're driving too slowly is NOT the proper response. Nine times out of ten, the driver in front of you is not going to "get the message" and yield his position.

    This is a great video, I just wish it didn't depict so many examples of poor and unsafe driving.

    1. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by ComaVN · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I didn't study it as closely as you did, but I've seen more of these time-lapse driving things, and it ALWAYS looks like the driver is a speeding maniac, brakes too late, makes erratic turns etc.

      I think it's the same effect you get when driving as a passenger: when you cannot control the vehicle, a distance you would judge as safe when driving yourself, suddenly seems a bit close.

      Add the (seemingly) extreme decelleration (sp?) and erratic steering, and it looks a lot more extreme than it really is.

      You make a good point about safety though. Anyway, it seems to be human nature to respond to people pushing from behind by slowing down.

      What I usually do, is use the turn signal to indicate I want to pass, and if that doesn't work, a brief flash of the headlights usually does the trick. There is a difference in road behaviour in different countries though: In Germany, this works great, in France or The Netherlands, not as good. Germans are used to people passing at 190km/h.

      Of course, our situation in Europe is a bit worse, because it's illegal to overtake on the right.

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    2. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by mpmansell · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, our situation in Europe is a bit worse, because it's illegal to overtake on the right.

      Unless you are in the UK where its the only side you are allowed to pass on :)
    3. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by WiseWeasel · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, it's illegal to BE passed on the right. It is your duty to be as far right as possible (within reason). Too bad no one follows this rule, and you have to ride people's asses or just pass them on the right. Flash your lights at someone, and you're liable to get shot...

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    4. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      I thought that was an urban legend

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    5. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Osty · · Score: 1

      What I usually do, is use the turn signal to indicate I want to pass, and if that doesn't work, a brief flash of the headlights usually does the trick. There is a difference in road behaviour in different countries though: In Germany, this works great, in France or The Netherlands, not as good. Germans are used to people passing at 190km/h.

      I did a similar (but longer) drive this past winter, going from Seattle to New Mexico and back by way of California. I used the flash quite a bit, and most folks were more than willing to get out of the way.


      In my normal daily driving, I typically don't bother with flashing people out of the way, since I don't have my cruise control set at a comfortable speed (I reserve the flash during daily driving for, "Hey, there's a cop back behind me, watch out," or, "Nice Porsche, I'm in one too"). When I'm doing long-distance driving, I'll set my cruise and give people a flash at a good distance before I get too close. If they don't move, or can't, I'll slow down and wait for a proper opening. 9 times out of 10, though, they'll move.

    6. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you for making the road a more dangerous place.

      What, it hurts your ego to be passed by someone?

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    7. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      That urban legend is about cars in opposing traffic with their lights off, not flashing slow drivers in the fast lane.

      I'm not sure who was going slow in the fast lane, but a woman was shot while her husband was driving on the Grand Central Parkway in Queens N.Y. around Christmas a few years back. They finally caught the guy a couple years later.

    8. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by RichardX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That really makes you a bit of a twat then, doesn't it. You realise you're just increasing that driver's frustration, making it more likely an accident will occur?

      And be very careful. Should an accident occur while you're pulling this stunt, even if it's through no fault of your own, you may end up taking the blame, as you were deliberately blocking another driver. The "Yeah, but he was being an asshole!" defence doesn't tend to stand too well

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    9. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by revmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If anyone flashes me (UK) in this fashion I deliberately make their task of passing as difficult as possible.

      Hey, why do you suppose it's called the passing lane?

      People accidentally loiter in the passing lane all the time, it's easy to drift off and not realize where you are, but when you are reminded nicely to get out of the way(flashing lights), and you not only refuse, but start being an asshole about it you deserve be pulled over and fined.

      Being passed in the passing lane is illeagal here, and for good reason. How would you feel if you were being taken to the hospital with a critical illness, only to be held up on the way by some idiot with a sore ego and something to prove?

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    10. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of the situation, riding someone's tail as closely as some "interstate cowboys" do is not safe at all. You never know when the driver in front of you is going to need to stop or slow down. And the faster you go, the wider the distance you'll need to stop in time.

      Sometimes, I'll be in one of the rightmost lanes at a moderate pace, and some moron comes at me at 90 mph. I can usually see these clowns in the mirror, and they always have a nervous look on their face. Maybe they should calm down, and go at their own pace, instead of constantly trying to get ahead in their fast-moving heavy metallic objects. Personally, that's why I drove slow. To be mellow and relaxed. That, and the fact that my 20-year-old clunker doesn't accelerate too well. :-)

    11. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is your duty to be as far right as possible

      Ah, I knew there was something funny about your political system! Thanks for clearing that up. It all makes sense now.

    12. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Insightful

    13. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by FlyMuts · · Score: 0, Troll

      The UK is the 52th state of the USA, it's only fault is that it's placed on the euro-asian plate, not on the american ...

    14. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I think a lot of the cases where it looks like he could be tailgating is a situation if he is stuck in traffic. Because it is going 95x Normal Speed moving 5 mph is 470 mph in the video. For most of the time he seems to be at a safe distance from the cars.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tut, tut... the colonials are getting restless today.

    16. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Caeda · · Score: 0, Troll

      "I spend a lot of my time doing interstate driving. As such, I realize that there are plenty of assholes out there doing 65mph in the passing lane where the speed limit is 70. But drivers who tailgate in the passing lane (or any lane, really) are IMO just as much of a risk for accidents." Wow. That's pretty cool. Cause the 3 states I drive in routinely have this law about "2 miles over." It means that your allowed 2mph leeway from the speedlimit, passing or not. Since interstate is 65mph, I guess that means 65+2=70 by your logic. "Nine times out of ten, the driver in front of you is not going to "get the message" and yield his position." Perhaps that's because 9 times out of 10, the person who is stuck behind another car is some asshole trying to go 85mph+ and weaving through traffic cutting people off, occasionally flipping the middle finger at them when he cant get around fast enough. It's the people who drive like complete morons that piss the rest of us off enough that we don't feel like moving every time someone can't save a little fuel and join the convoy.

      --
      ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    17. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Caeda · · Score: 2, Informative

      " In the US, it's illegal to BE passed on the right." You must live in a different US than I live in. In the US that I live in, we have these things called "passing lanes." These lanes can be on the right, or the left. In fact, they even teach this concept in "drivers education" about it being legal to pass as long as there is a clear and designated lane in which to do it...

      --
      ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    18. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by LordBodak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Virginia, failure to yield the passing lane, regardless of speed, is illegal. Unfortunately, it's not enforced as often as it should be.

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    19. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Sinter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just this winter, my friend and I were driving very early in the morning, on a nearly empty highway in farily dense fog. He was in the fast lane, and came upon a car that was going significantly slower than he. Now, he had plenty of room to pass on the right, but he decided to flash his lights at this car, but realized too late that it was a Cop!

      We got pulled over, and the officer told us that it was actually illegal to flash your high-beams for any reason. You know why? It blinds the oncoming traffic!

      --
      From Wherever to Whenever.
    20. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by msim · · Score: 1

      I had this yesterday morning when on the way home from work (nightshift), i was in the right lane (fast lane here in .au, we drive on the left), left and right lanes plodding along at a leasurely 70km/h (35/40mph-ish) with no lane faster than the other, i kept a reasonable buffer in front of me as i was going home from 12 hrs of work overnight and i was shatterdly tired and didn't want to cause an accident. Meanwhile mr dickwad in his 4x4 ute decided that i wasnt going fast enough and hung off my bumper, i didn't notice him for a little bit, but when i did, i immediately adopted the attitude of "fuck you, im not gonna tailgate for your stupidity, nor am i gonna let you pass yet, the left lane is bumper to bumper, nowhere to change lanes into".

      Anyhow i gave this guy about 4-5km's of not moving over and driving entirely reasonably. i got flashing lights, honking horns. Eventually i got sick of his arseheaded behaviour and decided i didn't need a bullbar up the clanker and merged left. he proceeded to go and bully car after car after car. I shoulda got his rego details and reported a complaint to the coppers about this fuckwit, but i realised long afte he'd nicked off.

      yeah, slight rant, slightly badly formatted. Who gives a shit. :-)

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    21. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by msim · · Score: 1

      I thought that was Australia, no?

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    22. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your state. I'm pretty sure it was legal (but discouraged) in Minnesota when I took driver's ed a few years ago.

    23. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by thedillybar · · Score: 1
      You made a good joke, but having watched the video, the guy does appear to be a very impatient driver. Time after time after time, he runs right up to someone's bumper in the left lane, follows very closely for some time, then winds up passing them on the right.

      That makes him an impatient driver? Apparently you've never driven in Michigan...

    24. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh. right. its his fault because the guy behind him ran into him? he is kind of a twat though. a little.

      but i understand his frustration. i can't stand it when people are tailgating me in the high speed lane. i don't mind if they flash their lights. i'll move if they have a little patience. i think tailgating unnecessarily risky at 70 mph though and it pisses me off they would endanger my life that way. if you are mad, honk or flash lights. tailgate and i'll just slow down. not to piss you off (although this is an added bonus), but to decrease danger of a high speed accident. and the tailgater usually passes or backs off a little. and if they don't, hey i'd rather have someone tailgating me at 50mph than 70 mph.

    25. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by JWW · · Score: 1

      In some places, interstate speed limits are 70mph. In others they are 75mph. 65 is not the speed limit everywhere.

    26. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two quick comments. First, I believe it's illegal to pass on the right, just like it's illegal to be in the left lane more than .25 miles after passing someone. I really hate it when people don't move to the right when there's room. Secondly, in Chicago the posted speed limit is around 60, but traffic drives at 70; 90+ in the left lane.

    27. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by operagost · · Score: 1
      That only seems to be the case in certain states and Canada, as many vehicles sold in the U.S.(including mine) have a Flash-to-pass feature on the brights, where you can push the stalk to get your brights to flick on and off without turning on your headlights.

      The only reason I presume this is illegal in Canada is because the manual says it's not available on Canadian vehicles. Of course, all Canadian vehicles have DRL, so that may be the reason.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had my way about it, the slowpoke would get a little gentle tap in the rear, just like in NASCAR when you are attempting to pass lapped traffic...

    29. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      That's because "flashing your lights" isn't supposed to be "flashing your high beams"... you're supposed to turn your headlights off and back on (same as you do to indicate to a semi that he's clear to come into your lane, incidentally).

      Which doesn't explain why my minivan can flash its highbeams by pulling back on the turnsignal stick, but to flash the main lights requires reaching down to a dial on the dash. Oh well.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    30. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      You can try the flash of lights here in America, but most of the time, the guy will start driving while looking in the rear view mirror at you, cussing you out and yelling 'Get off my a**!!' They think it is their God-given right to drive slow and think they have a right to make you slow down......

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    31. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by asterisk_man · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, can someone point me to information that agrees with the parent's assertion that it is illegal to BE passed on the right in the US? Any state will do. I would just like to read the detail of the law considering it does not seem that it would always be the fault of the person being passed.
      Thanks

    32. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      In Virginia, failure to yield the passing lane, regardless of speed, is illegal. Unfortunately, it's not enforced as often as it should be.

      I think pretty much all states have this law, and only the enforcement varies.

      NW Arkansas is very well-enforced, especially along I540/US71 (a four-lane divided) because of the combination of a lot of semi traffic and a lot of elderly drivers (it's a big retirement area, and grandmothers were regularly getting splattered by semis along there). It's really kind of nice to be buzzing along in the fast lane and having people zip out of your way without you having to touch your cruise. First time it happened I thought "Everybody's getting over... and I'm not even driving a Crown Vic." (The drawback is when someone comes up behind *you* and there's no way to time it such that you can let them pass without having to drop in behind someone slower, but so it goes.)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    33. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by photon317 · · Score: 2, Informative


      Nope. His wording makes it sound funny because he's stating things a little differently than the law does, but he's essentially correct for how the TX traffic laws are. I think it's reasonable of me to assume that other states (at least some of them) would be similar.

      "Slower traffic keep right" is a legal obligation - so if you're going slower than someone and you don't yield to the right to allow them to pass on the left, you can be ticketted for it. The "passing lane" is always the leftmost - it is never explicitly designated to be anywhere else. On multi-lane freeways (I don't know if this starts at 3 or 4 lanes), the leftmost lane is considered a true "passing-only lane", which is to say that not only do you have an obligation to yield out of it for faster traffic - you have a legal obligation to not be in the lane to begin with unless you're in the act of passing someone else, or you're in an emergency (or you're a cop/ambulance/firetruck with the lights running). This rule breaks down in heavier traffic, never seen it enforced at those times, but I'm not sure if they actually wrote in an exception to the law for heavy/slow traffic.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    34. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Bellyflop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a god-given right. It's a law-given privledge. I think people in the US seem to forget that driving is a privledge, not a right. Society is allowing you to put the rest of us at risk by allowing you to operate a machine that weighs several thousand pounds at high speeds. You pose a significant risk to MANY other people and as such, you have no right to make it even more risky by driving too fast.

    35. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by photon317 · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=109652&thresho ld=-1&commentsort=0&tid=133&mode=thread&pid=931323 0#9314345

      --
      11*43+456^2
    36. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Florida's equivalent of the highway code says to flash the driver in front when you're overtaking. Who is your insurance company? I would like to print and forward your post to them.

    37. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      In some places, interstate speed limits are 70mph. In others they are 75mph. 65 is not the speed limit everywhere.

      I hear the limit on I-10 through parts of Arizona is 80mph now.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    38. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The speed limit is 65. Traffic in the right lane is moving at 60. I'm in the left lane doing 72. Why should I keep moving into the slow lane to let you get by at 85?

    39. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by British · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget the additional padding of extra speed on certain states. In Minnesota, it's 5mph on average, but on I-35E northbound(during rush hour nonetheless) people were whizzing by at 90mph.

    40. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you value the rear of your car.

    41. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I have people trying that all the time around here, on a 4 lane highway with traffic everywhere.

      It's kind of funny actually, someone with a hopped up honda or something coming up behind me, and blinking their lights like their on the autobahn or something ahah...
      Of course, I don't think that they realize that if I manage to find a way to get out of the way, the person in front of me, or the person in front of them, or the person in front of them, might not. (think full lanes)

      Usually the first thing that pops in my head when someone does that is, "Who the hell do you think *you* are?"

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    42. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by op00to · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong, wrong, wrong.

      I am schooled as a transportation planner. That being said, traffic laws vary from state to state, but in general, every state has laws against impeding traffic. While you are correct that driving over the speed limit is illegal, it is importatn to note that impeding the flow of traffic is also illegal. Even if someone is speeding, you are still required to yield well in advance to the overtaking vehicle.

      Sorry bub, you're not allowed to play traffic cop in your mom's minivan.

    43. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      why, for not following florida highway code?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    44. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I drive a BIG truck with a huge trailer hitch. I don't get tailgated.

    45. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by dtrent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Um, no, but I bet you use that little untrue gem to justify your own aggressive driving, don't you?

    46. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by d474 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I feel your pain. I've noticed it's usually the guys in the big 4x4's that go crazy like that. Once I was in the slow lane, SLOW lane, and no traffic in the fast lane. I was going 50mph in a 65mph zone because across the highway there was a vehicle fire, big flames! Next thing I know this guy is on my ass in a raised 4x4, honking and flashing his brights. He finally realizes he can pass so he does. I looked up at him as he passed and he was yelling and screaming at me. I just laughed. I think in boils down to that some of these guys are just pissed because they get such horrible gas mileage.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    47. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by BrianH · · Score: 1

      Nope. Some states, including California, did away with passing lane laws because they're not very useful in urbanized environments where optimizing traffic flow requires that all laned be used.

      But the OP would be cited for other things out here, as a friend of mine learned the hard way last week after deciding to limit himself to 60MPH in order to save gas and money. His theory worked...his mileage went way up and his fuel bill went down, but the ticket he got for "Obstructing Traffic" will negate any financial gains he was hoping to see for quite some time.

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    48. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by gid · · Score: 1

      I've heard stories of people getting tickets for speeding and not keeping up with the flow of traffic at the same time. Dunno if it's true or not, but in theory it's possible.

    49. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by miltimj · · Score: 1

      "Blocking another driver"?? So in rush hour, am I driving illegally because I'm "deliberately blocking another driver"?

      Please, show me this law.

      Quite the contrary, many states have laws that state that the driver who hits another driver from behind is at least 90% at fault.

      Oh, since I asked for a reference, I suppose I should give one to backup my statement. Okay, here it is...

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    50. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm from Texas, and have never heard of this rule. Explains some of the behavior I saw in North Carolina though.

      Seriously though, what's the point of it? It looks to me only to encourage bad driving habits. Emergency vehicles have flashing lights and loud sirens and we know very well to get the hell out of the way ASAP. (I've even run through red lights to evacuate the left turn lane so they can pass.) I've seen a couple times a car speeding with hazards on and lights flashing and it's obvious that an emergency situation is taking place, so I move.

      But forcing people to get out of the left lane, and restricting trucks out of the left lane (popular along I-40), just seems to encourage bad drivers to zip into the left lane and cause a pile-up on the inside of the highway where it's that much more difficult for the rescue vehicles to get in and control the scene.

      Out of curiosity, is there some other rule from the east/west coast states mandating that drivers should get up on an interstate highway ramp and slow to a complete stop? Never saw that in Houston -- though Houstonians hate using their damn blinkers to indicate a lane change, at least they accelerate up to the traffic speed before merging in.

    51. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I physically cannot turn my car headlights off while driving. So what choice do I have but to use my brights when signalling?

    52. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by klaricmn · · Score: 1

      Just this winter, my friend and I were driving very early in the morning, on a nearly empty highway in farily dense fog. He was in the fast lane, and came upon a car that was going significantly slower than he.
      If there was in fact dence fog i'll be that the cop got you for driving too fast for conditions if you came up on his tail that fast. The ticket for illegally using your high beams was likely just icing.

    53. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Matt1313 · · Score: 1

      "Riding the bumper of the person in front of you because they're driving too slowly is NOT the proper response."

      No the proper response is, pull out your handgun and whip off a few rounds at their windshield.
      Nine times out of ten, the driver in front of your IS going to "get the message" and yield his position.
      Barring that - flip them off when you pass them on the left (shoulder).

      If you are NOT passing when you are in the left lane, get over to a NON-passing lane. There is a reason they call it the "passing" lane. You think?

    54. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Matt1313 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand....
      What if he was in a rush to get to a hospital becuase his kid was just run over by a car?
      Or what if he was in a rush because he just got a call from his wife that their house was being robbed. (Oh wait, you are in Oz they don't have crime there since they outlawed handguns, my bad). *roll*

    55. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

      You're right - it is illegal to impede the flow of traffic. It would almost be a good post, if only you're puerile jibe weren't included.

      My mom doesn't drive a minivan; she drives the modern-day equivalent - a SUV.

    56. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      People stopping on the onramps may be a bad habit from the East Coast. When I was out in NY and NJ, the first thing I noticed was the fact that merge onto the highway is about 10 feet long (no kidding), so you have to stop because if there is no gap in traffic while you are merging you are going to end up slamming into someone. Some of the highways don't even really have a merge, you come off the onramp directly into a lane.

    57. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by mcb · · Score: 1

      yes they are quite different in different states. it's 55 everywhere in pennsylvania, except on the turnpike west of civilization it's 65 (harrisburg to pittsburgh area).

    58. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Uart · · Score: 1

      In Pennsylvania it is illegal to not allow someone to pass you on the left. If you speed up when someone tries to pass you, you can get ticketed for it. Not that the PA state cops particularly like to enforce that one... (they also do a crap job of enforcing the 55mph limit on the PA Turnpike, not that I mind)

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    59. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by LordBodak · · Score: 1
      The reason is that accidents aren't caused by speed, they're caused by stupidity. People weaving in and out of traffic because someone won't get out of the left lane is what leads to accidents.

      Look at the Autobahn. "Drive right" is the fundamental rule there, and things are significantly safer (although the fact that driver education is much more extensive than in the US also plays a role).

      --
      LordBodak's journal.
    60. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Of course, I don't think that they realize that if I manage to find a way to get out of the way, the person in front of me, or the person in front of them, or the person in front of them, might not. (think full lanes) Usually the first thing that pops in my head when someone does that is, "Who the hell do you think *you* are?"

      No kidding. I personally don't hang out in the passing lane. I use them to pass and then move right. But it's amazing in the city on major multi-lane roads (not highways) where there really isn't a "passing lane" but just a bunch of lanes that pretty much all 3 lanes will be going 40mph and there are cars in front of me in all lanes as far as the eye can see and some dufus comes up behind me, tailgating me, flashing his lights suggesting that I get out of the way. WTF? Where in the world does he think he's going to go if I get out of the way, one car-length ahead?

      It's always amusing seeing idiots doing that or weaving in and out of rush-hour traffic only to pull up next to them again at the next stop light. A lot of good all that pressure, light flashing, and weaving did them.

    61. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riding the bumper of the person in front of you because they're driving too slowly is NOT the proper response.

      Yea! Flash your brights and honk his ass off WHILE you're riding his bumper. This is the proper response.

    62. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by msim · · Score: 1

      first of all *FWAP*.

      Ssecond of all he had a big shit eating grin on his face i could even see through my rear vision mirror, so i doubt the other possibilities. He was just being a twat, he wasnt even raising his arms or looking like he was yelling at me with hiw windows wound up either. ;-)

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    63. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by hal9000 · · Score: 1

      Funny, out of all the states I've driven in, Virginian drivers are the worst about cruising in the passing lane. Either 80% of Virginians don't know of this rule, or 80% of Virginians are complete douchebags.

      (Between you and me, as a former Virginian, it's the latter.)

      --
      Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology; Ain't got time to make no apology
    64. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by msim · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well idiots in their roo shooters, blokes in their over-raised 4x4's and soccer mums (no Mom's to be seen here!)in their X5's are all the bloody same to me.

      That is unless they actually have a use for their vehicles, like using it to tow a whoop ass big boat or they take it offroad or sumthink.

      (Half the reason for the hatred for 'em is the stupidity they display, along with the fact i have a small car AND a motorbike.)

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    65. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah so your the asshole that was blocking me from getting to the hospital. Fucking jackass.

    66. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except flashing the headlights is an accepted alternative to honking the horn in cases where honking the horn might be too disruptive.

      I bet you also do stupid things when people honk their horns at you on a one-lane highway. In some states, the law requires you to honk your horn to signal that you want to pass on one-lane highways.

    67. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by leondrb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure about other states but in California it is legal to flash your lights at a slow driver in the left lane. It's just not legal to flash your high beams because of that blinding, swerving, and crashing thing. It will also blind the car you are folowing, not just oncoming trafic, because of the rear view mirror. That's why when you are pulled over at night there is usually a bright white light on the crusers light bar shining into your car, and it helps them see you better.

      --
      --The best thing about working at home... Homebrew!
    68. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by tricops · · Score: 1

      It's not available on Canadian vehicles? Weird, I thought my Golf had that... Maybe it's just "most" Canadian vehicles, or maybe I'm mistaken and it flashes the regular beams, but I could have sworn it flashed the brights

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    69. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh - you think Virginia traffic laws are under-enforced? Try driving from DC to NC along 95 with out-of-state plates and see if your opinion changes any. :)

    70. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      if im going the speed limit
      your committing the illegal act by passing me on the right

    71. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Zebbers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What it hurts your ego do shut the fuck up get in line and do the speed limit?

    72. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Uh, not.

      Check your local laws.

      Most talk about passing on the right on 2-lane, not interstate.

      However, at least here in Arizona, there is a way to get busted for this.

      1. The sign when you enter the state says to keep right except to pass.
      2. Signs apply to you whenever you're on that roadway and another sign hasn't altered the directive.
      3. There is no sign saying you can keep to the left, ever.

      So if they wanted to, cops could start writing that ticket for everyone on the I-10 who isn't in the right lane except to pass, including people just commuting from Tempe to Glendale.

      P.S. It's not illegal to drive barefoot anywhere, either.

    73. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by mikedevx · · Score: 1

      Perfect scenario that illustrates the rules of the road. You pull over at your convenience to let him pass you. Doesn't matter if he's speeding or not, doesn't matter if you're speeding or not. If "your convenience" takes longer than, say, 30 seconds, you brake and merge into the slower traffic and you LET HIM PASS. Otherwise you should keep off the road. Who's worse, the out of control speeder or the "I'm driving the speed limit so I OWN the left lane, I'm a traffic cop mamma, look at me, look at me, look at me!" asshole? Well, yeah, the out of control speeder... but it's close. You're both a danger to the rest of us and often induce justified road rage.

    74. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you learned to drive but passing to the right isn't the proper response around here[Upstate, NY].(doesn't stop people from doing it)

      I wish that they would make passing to the right illegal. Of course it probably wouldn't be enforced like the law that says if you're driving with your wipers on you have to have your headlights on[DRLs don't count].

    75. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by SUJovian · · Score: 1

      I heard a story from a friend who visited India that they take a remarkably different approach over there. As I recall, it was customary to drive with only your parking lights on (to save energy, was his claim), until you glimpsed another vehicle, at which point you turned on your headlights. When the oncoming car was just about on you, you were supposed to hit your brights, with the intention of "making sure the other driver could see you." He swore it was the truth, though I never bought it for a second.

      --
      Go hang a salami, I'm a lasagna hog
    76. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      Same way in New York. I've _never_ seen it enforced. But legality isn't much of a concern around here. Our State Police routinely hit the lights and siren so they can get to Dunkin' Donuts faster.

    77. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by mrquicknet · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The passing on the right law varies from state to state.

      I had an argument with a friend about this a while ago and each state has their own rules. Some say you can pass on the right.

      --
      --------- Steve Martin once said, "Sex is the most natural, most beautiful, most wonderful thing that money can buy."
    78. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by mikedevx · · Score: 1

      No, you don't pull over (and you're not breaking the law). Assuming you're following the rules of the road, it's the driver *in front of you* who is going too slow - and impeding you - and the driver in front of him, and so on, and so on. During rush hour, brake n stop n go traffice, there is no passing lane. Doesn't apply. But if there are significant gaps ahead of you in the passing lane and YOU are the culprit, yes, you need to merge over into the slower lanes soon.

    79. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      Nope. Some states, including California, did away with passing lane laws because they're not very useful in urbanized environments where optimizing traffic flow requires that all laned be used.

      Not necessarily specifically passing-lane law, but (as you later mentioned) everybody's got an "obstructing traffic" statute one way or another.

      And I don't think the Arkansas law I mentioned earlier says you can't *use* the left lane (which on a four-lane isn't merely a passing lane), it's just that if somebody faster than you wants to use it, you need to get over to let them. You can continue to use it either to drive in or to pass even slower cars as long as you're doing so in a reasonable time period. You just can't sit left paralleling a car going the same speed, even if both of you are 5 (or 20) mph over the speed limit.

      (Of course, I got it all secondhand, since I don't live in Arkansas, but I do travel 540/71 fairly often and got to see it in action. Very nice.)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    80. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Thuktun · · Score: 2, Informative

      [...] but he's essentially correct for how the TX traffic laws are. I think it's reasonable of me to assume that other states (at least some of them) would be similar. "Slower traffic keep right" is a legal obligation [...]

      This varies by state. Some states have no laws to that effect, some at the other end of the spectrum have laws that you cannot be in the leftmost lane on certain roadways unless you're passing, and some are somewhere in the middle.

    81. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by M.+Silver · · Score: 1

      I physically cannot turn my car headlights off while driving. So what choice do I have but to use my brights when signalling?

      Pfft. Cycle your ignition, of course.

      (But really... I thought the "daytime headlights" were lower-power than actually having the headlights on. Are they not anymore?)

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    82. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Don't drive a Volvo then... (I have one, 1992 model 940, nice car).

    83. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by FerretOnMountDew · · Score: 1

      In some states, it's illegal to flash your lights at someone. In Maryland, for instance, you must instead honk your horn -- which I beleive is illegal in other states (Connecticut, I think, amongst them).

      Driving laws differ from state to state drastically. Most people don't get in trouble for silly things like staying in the far right lane or improperly using their horn. But if an asshole cop wants to cause a little trouble for you, or if any cop notices something else out of the ordinary, they might use those seemingly obscure laws as an excuse to pull you over.

      --
      Please, do not read this sig
    84. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Kallahar · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify, the camera is mounted on the front license plate, and it has a limited field of view. Between those two, the final image looks far closer to other traffic than the vehicle actually was. I never tailgated anyone, but I did pass on the right because most drivers are inconsiderate to those who wish to go faster.

    85. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by op00to · · Score: 1

      What good is slashdot if you can't poke people once in a while. :) C'mon, fight back! It's much more fun that way.

    86. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by justMichael · · Score: 1

      There are actually a few laws that can fit this one, depending on the officer and the judge. There are probably more, but this is all I bothered to dig up.

      And yes they all relate to "the normal speed of traffic" so all bets are off in rush hour.

      Yielding for Passing
      Slow-Moving Vehicles
      Turning Out of Slow-Moving Vehicles

    87. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern-day equivalent? The Chevrolet Suburban was availible (with 4 wheel drive) long before there was a Chevrolet Astro Minivan.

      If you want to go way back, the Jeep used by US military in WWII was slightly older than the WWII German Kubelwagen, and both are older than the 1950 VW Type II.

      VW Type II could be considered first minivan. It is basically a rear engine econobox with front seat on top of (and drivers feet in front of) front wheeland sticking up high to catch annoying crosswinds. About same weight, engine power, wheelbase, and trackwidth as '77 datsun b210, just about 200lbs heavier. Its iffy because it won't fit in a standard garage, which is one the defining factors of a minivan.

      If VW Type II does NOT count as first minvan, then you must wait till mid 80s Chevy Astro, Ford Aerostar and whatever the Dodge was.

      My point is that the SUV came at least 10 and possibly as many as 45 years before the Minivan, therefore the SUV is not a new alternative to the minivan, its an OLD one.

    88. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      YOu really should have called the ambulance for that bottle up your ass. They can make sure it doesn't break on the way to the hospital.
      They also know not to take rush hour traffic routes to a hospital ;)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    89. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1

      There's a problem with slowing down and backing off.

      Lots of people will not realize you want to get by them and they may not even notice you. Time after time I gain on people who are pacing an 18-wheeler for god knows what reason - passing with the cruise on - wtf? - and I wait patiently for a little bit, and they sit and sit, and then I get on their bumper, and they suddenly notice me in their rear-view mirror and get on with finishing their pass.

      In other words, sometimes you need to get people's attention and communicate your intention. Becoming visibly large in the rear-view mirror breaks into the automated cerebellum processes and forces an interrupt, thus causing the driver ahead to disengage the mental auto-pilot.

    90. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by ComaVN · · Score: 1

      Yeah, stupid of him to get injured in a densely populated area during rush hour. Bad planning :P

      --
      Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    91. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by kharchenko · · Score: 2, Informative

      More to the point, these rules are not enforced by police, and most drivers are not even aware of them.

      Another factor compounding the problem is low speed limits - a person going 55mpg in a leftmost lane has all reason to believe that noone should have a right to pass him.

    92. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1
      > It's not a god-given right. It's a law-given privledge. I think people in the US seem to forget that driving is a privledge, not a right

      Are you really that ignorant of the law?!

      Right To Travel

      Right to Travel: The Constitutional Case
      Specifically

      In the U.S., the right to travel is derived from the synthesis of several rights. This was quite well laid out in Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958) at 125-126.

      "The right to travel is a part of the `liberty' of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. . . . Freedom of movement across frontiers in either direction, and inside frontiers as well, was a part of our heritage. Travel abroad, like travel within the country, . . . may be as close to the heart of the individual as the choice of what he eats, or wears, or reads. Freedom of movement is basic in our scheme of values."


      All LAW is CONTRACT. (Ask a lawyer if you don't believe me. They will very grudgingly admit it, because "Might does not make Right.")

      Furthermore, I *know* it is a right, because I drive without a driver's license and have never gotten a ticket for "driving without a license" the few times I have been pulled over.

      Lastly, where do you think the government gets it privileges from??
      Does the government create people, or do people create the government?

      > you have no right to make it even more risky by driving too fast.

      Correct, freedom doesn't mean you have the right to be irresponsible!

      --
      I'm not the first to say "The fallacy of Science is that it rejects the Truth of the Subjective, but yet it relies on the Subjective to reach the Objective!"
      Others have said it too... "I'm criticizing the notion that there is any single special method that all scientists use, which would warrant the label "the scientific method."

      Dispelling Some Common Myths about Science
    93. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at a few episodes of Coupling or The Office. They are genious these Brits! Coupling is **so** much better than Friends, it's not even funny ;)

    94. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

      Hmm you seem to be confusing the right to travel with the right to drive a car. You have one of them, but you don't have the other.

    95. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      furthermore a car must get around another car within 2 miles, in reality it shouldn't take much more then a 1/4 mile at most to get around a car. Maybe longer with a truck. This is why I hate cruise control, those people who have a differantial of .2 mph so they crawl past. When you come to a car, you either match their speed and tuck behind them, or you accel and get around them and get out of the lane. Everytime i went from parents home to universtiy I screamed at people the whole way. I just pass them on the right and hope they get a clue. I really wish their was more PA cops out for this.

    96. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.

      While we're on the topic of puerile, I'd like to point out two small problems with your post.

      You completely eroded all power of a nice vocabulary with some poor, poor grammar. "You're" is not possessive. Sorry, it's a contraction.

      Secondly, you shouldn't be proud that she drives an SUV. Unless your mom is doing a lot of off-road driving or towing, she would be doing our planet and other drivers a favor by driving a minivan instead of an SUV.

      Peace traveler.

    97. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      But I bet they don't relate to "overtaking drivers" exceeding the speed limit, which is I suspect the majority of the cases.

    98. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by turbosk · · Score: 1

      Quoth Zebbers: "if im going the speed limit your committing the illegal act by passing me on the right"

      IF you're going the speed limit AND driving in the left lane AND not passing anybody, it SHOULDN'T be an illegal act for me to SHOOT you in the FACE as I'm PASSING you on the RIGHT.

      pax,
      fred

    99. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Bellyflop · · Score: 1

      Ahh geez, I was just kidding! I just like to poke fun at all the soccer mom's out there with their gas guzzlers driving to the grocery store. Just seems like overkill unless you're feeding a family of 20.

    100. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by photon317 · · Score: 1


      Two points here -

      1) In Texas, people are becoming aware of the pasing issues. They've had big signs up on the major interstates for years now that say "Slower traffic must keep right", and recently in Houston the local news covered some new more specific laws (don't know if they're state, county, or local) that made the left-lane passing-only on multi-lane roads.

      2) A person going the speed limit in the left lane has no reason to believe that nobody has the right to pass him. Speed limit laws and passing laws are entirely seperate orthogonal issues. The guy doing 90 is violating a speeding law, and you are violating a passing law by sitting in the leftmost lane at 55 when he wants to pass you. You are each breaking a different law. However, the speeder is breaking his law for whatever reason (a no good reason usually, but for all you know maybe he's in an emergency of some sort) - whereas if you refuse to let him pass you're breaking the law vigilante style (I'll break the law to prevent him from breaking the law), which is clearly unacceptable.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    101. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riding the bumper of the person in front of you because they're driving too slowly is NOT the proper response. Nine times out of ten, the driver in front of you is not going to "get the message" and yield his position.

      Not all will respond the same way. Most inexperienced drivers (more likely those with learner's permit) will panic and step on the gas. True, those 90% drivers aren't gonna give a damn. I'm probably that 0.1% (not a typo) drivers who actually slow down to a tailgater. If you want more speed, go to the other lane, especially if I'm close the speed limit.

    102. Re:He seems a dangerous driver (serious) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You're confusing the right to drive a car on public roads with the right to drive a car.

      You have the latter, but not the former.

  61. Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey that was cool!!

    Thank god he didnt use "Born to be wild"

  62. I can see my house from here... by Juanvaldes · · Score: 1

    well kinda. 3 min 2 sec and some frames.
    Cool way to make the treck less boring even if it's after the fact.

  63. Motion sickness? by novakreo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did anyone else feel sick watching the video?

    I don't normally get motion sickness at all any more, but that's what I felt when I watched this.

    --
    O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    1. Re:Motion sickness? by hutkey · · Score: 0

      Did anyone else feel sick watching the video?

      dude! exactly which video did you watched? ;)

  64. I have a better idea... by subterranean · · Score: 1

    Video tape yourself sleeping for 8 hours, slow it down, and watch yourself sleep at mach 9! It couldn't be more boring than this...

    p.s.
    Make the file a 1 mb flash movie that loops 60 times. It will look the same and save loads of time and bandwidth.

  65. Uh? $50? Isn't that a bit low? by shanen · · Score: 1

    No one's said anything, but can that possibly be a correct price? Or does he mean he picked them up at a garage sale somewhere? Actually, even at a garage sale, I'd be more than a bit surprised.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  66. Similar experience... by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not quite on that scale and not taken that seriously. I set up my Olympus E-10 on a tripod in my back seat and had it take a picture every five minutes during a straight 17.5 hour drive from Boston to Champaign, IL. It worked out pretty well, considering...

    --
    Steven N. Severinghaus
    1. Re:Similar experience... by super+awesome · · Score: 1

      I realize now that if I were light, I'd get severe motion sickness.

      --

      m y k a r m a i s m o r e p o s i t i v e t h a n y o u r s.
  67. Re:So...Yes by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    when's the "Extended Edition" coming out?

    Yes, with the Director's Commentary track, and the Deleted Scenes and Bloopers.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  68. Just be sure to turn your camera off when... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just be sure to turn your camera off when you drive past Barbra Striesand's House.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Just be sure to turn your camera off when... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Offtopic - ignore...

      Have you given me Mod Points recently? Giving me Mod Points is the best way to interest me in Meta Moderating.

      How does one tell of one even has mod points?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Just be sure to turn your camera off when... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      How does one tell of one even has mod points?

      Little dropdown list boxes next to each article in threads where you haven't posted any messages yourself. You get 5 mod points to award from all the categories possible, and need to use them in 3 days before losing any unused ones.

      There's usually something in the header of the main page as well.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  69. Better - NY to LA on film by Michel Gondry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The director of Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind did a little seen video in the US for French act Lacquer which has the singer driving a convertible across the US from LA to NY in a single time lapse shot on film and supervised by a professional cinematographer.

    Seen here as a quicktime: Behind video

    The video was made in conjunction with Oliver's brother Twist, who used to write software for him including some of the original stereographic morphing software which led to BUF Compaigne creating the first bullet time shots.

    1. Re:Better - NY to LA on film by Michel Gondry by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      Actually, Olivier directed and edited that video, it's not a Michel Gondry direction. Read more. Kudos for mentioning it though, it's a great video (and song).

  70. remark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At Mach 9 I would not see anything at all....

  71. actually a slashdotting would sound like this by nounderscores · · Score: 4, Funny

    #1:"Hey, we're getting a lot of traffic from..."
    #1 & #2: "SLASHDOT!!!"
    #2:"quick redirect all traffic to that goatse.cx guy's website!"

    1. Re:actually a slashdotting would sound like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      #1 : "We get signal!"
      #slashdot : "How are you gentlemen!"

    2. Re:actually a slashdotting would sound like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hello Dreamhost Customers,

      Some of you may have noticed overall network slowness. One of our sites was hosting large video files that were being heavily accessed. This caused slowness for a portion of our network, and additionally impacted the performance of some of our mail servers.

      We've disabled the site as of approximately 10am PDT. The problems began sometime during the early morning, though it's unclear exactly when.

      Everything should be back to normal now. Our apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

      Happy DreamHost Networking Team!

      The preceding was a Downtime announcement, sent 2004-06-02 10:51:26.

      You are receiving it via email because it is level 5 and your account is set to get announcements of that level via email.
      You can change that by visiting our web panel's announcement area at: https://panel.dreamhost.com/?tab=status&subtab=ann ounce

      Thank you for taking the time to read this announcement, The Happy DreamHost Announcement Team

  72. DivX videos link on site by laejoh · · Score: 0

    Beware of this thing... I downloaded the free (ad supported) codec from http://www.divx.com/divx/?src=toptab_divx_from_/in dex.php.

    The damn silly thing has gator inside!

    I can hear you all say: what do you expect from sonething that's add supported? Yes, I do feel stupid for downloading it and wanted to give it a try

  73. Driving 'round Australia-Konigsberg Bridge problem by kale77in · · Score: 2, Funny

    One more good reason to drive round Australia! Only 16,000 kms if I ferry the car across to Tasmania as well. Alice Springs (and Ayer's Rock, the Olga's, Katherine Gorge, etc) creates a Konigsberg Bridge problem, however, since I won't be departing from either Darwin or Adelaide, but would like to do a north-south traversal as well. Darn graph theory...

  74. Interstate 5 by mikeg22 · · Score: 1

    Next time record it going up the 1, much nicer scenery. The 5 is probably the most boring drive in all of california. Bakersfield, Fresno, Stockton...holy god it is boring.

    1. Re:Interstate 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's no pretty aquaducts on 1.

      Ooh! He just went by my house! Right next to the UFO-looking water tower!

    2. Re:Interstate 5 by Maul · · Score: 1

      After you get about 100 miles or so North of Sacramento, the scenery on the I-5 gets considerably better. It is a shame that the best scenery gets shoved into a period of about 1 minute on this video (from the sounds of it, anyway).

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    3. Re:Interstate 5 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      That's only because I wasn't on the road with you. I can make driving MUCH more interesting .... and challenging.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    4. Re:Interstate 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I-5 in Fresno. That's a new one on me! :-)

  75. I did something similar by Boarder2 · · Score: 1

    Last year there was a large blizzard in Colorado, we got several feet of snow. Durring the second day I decided to set up my web cam and snap pictures for 24 hours just to see what it looked like.

    This is the movie I ended up with Go easy on me (Divx encoded)

  76. Thanks by inmodulo · · Score: 0

    I would like to just say thankyou both for the video - although I may neeed to lie down until the dizzyness stops - but for primarily seeing azureus peak at 340KB/s I knew they weren't ripping me off when I got my new line.

  77. Trippy road trip by srenker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Offtopic me if you must, but I was reminded of this video from Britain. It's not nearly as long, but it covers a stretch of motorway that uses reversible lanes without a center divider!

    --
    My new /. login is fabu10u$.
    1. Re:Trippy road trip by op00to · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boo! That's nothing. Try taking the Lincoln Tunnel from NYC to NJ at morning rush hour. There is a center concrete divider, but the fun part is that the far left lane of the outbound (NYC-NJ) lanes are used as a inbound bus lane! No divider there. Imagine driving out of NY at 60mph, and driving straight on at busses at 60mph. That, my friend, is hair raising.

  78. The secret's out by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

    OK, considering that there are a number of vehicles who stayed ahead of the car for several frames, either there are a LOT of similar-looking cars on the road that just happened to be in the right place at the right time, or else there are a bunch of other cars in this video doing Mach 9 as well.

    I'm impressed with those semis. That many sonic booms in their immediate vicinity all at once should have knocked them off the road.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  79. 65 Mb Bummer... by NoThumbsForMe · · Score: 0

    Where's the nudity?

    --
    now stand up and smell your chair...
  80. But saved by BT! by WoTG · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted by the time I got to it; however, this has got to be one of the fastest BitTorrent recoveries that I've ever seen. I ended up with about 1 MBit down on average from BT. Very, very, impressive.

    BT is simply amazing at ad-hoc file distribution tasks like this one. Only a year ago we'd have all been begging for mirrors (which invariably wouldn't keep up either).

    Ah well... go ahead and mod this as off-topic.

  81. Everyone can do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can also do this with a laptop and a webcam. I made loads of timelapse movies this way; driving, boating etc. Pretty cool (although useless) thing to do.

  82. Social etiquette for BitTorrent by ControlFreal · · Score: 1

    Wow, that was fast, also for me! :)

    Of course, do remember to leave the client open until you've uploaded at least at much as you've downloaded.

    I killed mine after 120 or so MB of upload

    --
    Support a Europe-related section on Slashdot!
  83. Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting



    Cool film. What's the soundtrack?

    1. Re:Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool film.

      cool? what ya mean? whats the idea at it? a sped up movie. wow.

    2. Re:Music by Thu+Anon+Coward · · Score: 1

      It would just have to be Steve Miller Band, "Living in the USA". They did the same thing with their video, speeded it up

      --



      I'm good with numbers - .45, 7.62, 9.....
    3. Re:Music by AstroSmith · · Score: 1

      This screams for the "Benny Hill" theme.

  84. Can't sleep? by l0wland · · Score: 2, Informative
    Couple of years ago there was a TV-program on the German TV, where a camera was mounted on a train. This train drove through different countries and sceneries.

    This programm was broadcasted at night, and was the best ever sleeping-drug I could imagine. Watching it after a busy day, it took only like 10 minutes before I fell in a deep sleep.

    BTW you don't need a car and a VCR to create movies like this. If you live next to water where boats go by, or a busy road, or construction-works, it's very easy to create a timelapse-movie with only a webcam and webcam-software. Just make a pic every second, and use a tool to stitch all those pics to 1 movie afterwards. I did this a lot with cloudy skies, and it much fun to watch afterwards.

    --

    "Honey, I feel a certain distance between us..." "Really? A 31ms ping ain't that bad..."
    1. Re:Can't sleep? by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative

      BTW you don't need a car and a VCR to create movies like this. If you live next to water where boats go by, or a busy road, or construction-works, it's very easy to create a timelapse-movie with only a webcam and webcam-software. Just make a pic every second, and use a tool to stitch all those pics to 1 movie afterwards. I did this a lot with cloudy skies, and it much fun to watch afterwards.

      I'll back this one up. It's definitely worth trying. It's just amazing the things you can see. If you're looking in the direction of an airport, a time-lapse movie will make contrails appear like missile launches. You can actually see the shadows of cirrus clouds moving across cumulus clouds. The most amazing thing is seeing the different cloud layers travelling in different (if not totally opposite) directions. The best frame rate I've found is taking 1 frame ever 10 seconds, replaying at 30 frames seconds for clouds.

      You can actually make your own time lapse software using Microsoft's MFC Vidcap demo. Just add a delay loop for the desired number of seconds. The only restriction is that there's a 2.5 Gigabyte file limit (around 2200 640x480 frames).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Can't sleep? by msim · · Score: 1

      Cool, i live 4km from an airport in a unit, on a high hill. i *never* thought of doing this, thats *way cool*.

      Now i wanna do it damnit!!!
      I'm sure it'll get a big bunch of "wtf?" from the missus however.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    3. Re:Can't sleep? by Dizzutch · · Score: 1

      I remember that in the Netherlands as well, the local TV station (TV West) mounted a camera on a car and just drove around for a while, i think it might have even been broadcasted in real-time. It was fun to see your own house, or yourself come by once in a while.

    4. Re:Can't sleep? by Xyde · · Score: 1

      Or, if you already have a folder full of images named Picture 01.jpg, Picture 02.jpg, or img001, img002, or what have you, you can use the Open image sequence... command of QuickTime Pro which will ask for the desired frame rate and open the series automatically into a new quicktime movie, which can then be exported to whatever format you feel like.

  85. just record straight to the hard disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should not be a problem. Hook up your notebook to your car's battery and just make sure you have the 25 gig space available needed for the video (as stated on the website). You may use a USB webcam or real camera hooked to a PCMCIA video capture card. Or just place a Sony Vaio with integrated camera (e.g. C1XN ) on your dashboard ;-)

  86. No Bug? by NewNole2001 · · Score: 1

    Man, it must be nice to be able to drive ten hours and not hit any bugs. This camera seems to stay spotless. I can't drive ten miles on I-4 here in the Tampa-Orlando stretch without creating a mass Lovebug grave on my hood/front of my car.

  87. Route by Bazman · · Score: 1

    He did that, and he didn't even take the scenic route? Could someone do it again, but this time take Highway 1 up the coast? Six minutes of high-speed concrete gets pretty dull and repetitive after about a minute, but I guess he had to find something to match his techno music.

  88. What would be really cool... by cr0z01d · · Score: 1

    ...is to see this downsampled properly. Put a low-pass filter on each pixel in the time domain before changing the framerate. Hell, I'd write the program. but I'd need some kind of framework to stick the code in.

    If I actually come up with anything I'll reply to this. Otherwise, assume I learned something but never felt a need to finish the project.

  89. Why go to all the trouble... by iranai · · Score: 1

    Quote(from site): "To create the video I had to capture the entire movie (25 gigs or so), extract it to single frames with VirtualDub, delete 99 out of 100 of them (left 10,000 frames), color correct and deinterlace them, and then create an avi from the stills with VideoMach. Then I just had to find a song that was exactly six minutes long." What's sad is that this could have ben done in one step with AVIsynth... faster and higher quality 8(

  90. Big boat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you drive around in the dessert with a really big boat?

    1. Re:Big boat by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      Maybe Californians are very susceptible to boat salesman?

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  91. 695.3 miles in 9.5 hours ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, I thought Americans generally were not amongst the fast moving drivers, even if it were only for the speed limits.

    As you probably know, in Germany we have no basic speed limit on the freeway (though there are some due to noise reduction in populated areas etc), and our average travel speed nowadays is about 160km/h (~100m/h). Maybe 25% of the cars go up to 190km/h, and there are those 5% which go at 210km/h and faster.

    Still, a December trip from Zuerich, Switzerland, to the Danish border of Germany (about 1020km) took me 10.5 hours with only two short rests, which I thought was reasonably fast (OK, it was winter and snow and rain partly slowed down the whole thing, but not much).

    695.3 miles on the other hand are 1120km, and doing them in 9.5 hours (including stop lights, traffic jams, rests etc) sounds pretty great to me. Is this the average travel speed in the US?

  92. framerate averaging by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    i know in after effects you have the option of changing the framerate and having it average the content of the in-between frames (instead of dropping them) so that it's smoother. i think if you wanted the effect of moving really fast, that would be better, even if a bit blurry. (hey, everything IS a blur when you're traveling at the speed of sound...)

    i'd like to see what it looks like that way, anyway... (have fun spending another 8 hours rendering!)

  93. Music Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Michel Gondry, creator of some milestone music videos (Björk, The White Stripes, Chemical Brothers, Beck, Rolling Stones, etc.) actually did exactly this in one music video. The video was pretty sophisticated because he didn't just speed up the video: he adjusted it so that every explicit event (driving out of a tunnel, streetlights when car stops, rocky mountains showing up, etc.) is directly linked to the music. When you look at the video you first think that it is just a trip from east to west-coast in 5 minutes but then you actually realize that everything you see in the movie perfectly fits the music.

    Get info here: [info about all the clips]

    There's a great DVD available too: [amazon]

  94. How did he... by Phidoux · · Score: 1

    ... keep the bugs from getting squished on the lens at that speed?

  95. Hook up a GPS too... by rediguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would be fun is to hook up a GPS as well, and overlay a moving map on the video as well. I must try this in New Zealand, as we have some awesome highways through the Southern Alps and lovely driving road... mmmmm...

  96. Travel CD - Game by Grummet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what would be really cool is if we could get a bunch of truckers from some massive trucking company to put these on their rigs and film different routes.

    same thing - put cameras/VCRs on UPS delivery trucks in cities (hey UPS - would you like to make a deal?) and then collect all of the video, edit it, make it interactive... so you can direct the vehicle...

    or at least create a program that allows for you to give an address and a destination and "voila" there is an automagically created video for you of a possible route.

    That way you can use visual cues so as to avoid getting lost. I bet there are lots of people who can't read maps that would love something like that.

    maybe if i get a gmail account and everyone emails me their video we could use up that terabyte!

    Course, I haven't googled for this so if it already exists...don't crucify me.

    - Grum

  97. Can't he keep right? by Cobblepop · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well it's confirmed: In over nine hours, he kept to the right for approximately 3 minutes of the trip.

    Great geek; terrible driver: http://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.html

    1. Re:Can't he keep right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when he's averaging 73 mph.

    2. Re:Can't he keep right? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Well it's confirmed: In over nine hours, he kept to the right for approximately 3 minutes of the trip.

      Great geek; terrible driver: http://www.mit.edu/~jfc/right.html

      Most of the drive being through california, he was only required to move to the right lane if someone driving faster came up behind him.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Can't he keep right? by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      Didn't you notice that the right hand lane is full of tractor trailers doing 55?

      This is California, not Massachusetts. The right most lane on California freeway is not for normal traffic, it's the trucking/merging lane. If not de jure, then de facto.

    4. Re:Can't he keep right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

    5. Re:Can't he keep right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you actually read the site you listed you would see that both California and Oregon state slower traffic keep right. I think its pretty obvious that he was not slower traffic in most cases. Good Geek.....bad poster.

  98. Mirror by kaltoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://kaltoft.linux.dk/2004Apr23_trip.avi
    http:/ /kaltoft.linux.dk/2004Apr23_trip_small.avi

    1. Re:Mirror by d474 · · Score: 1

      I think your sight is /.'d - Wow, linking video doesn't seem to be a good idea, huh. I wanna see MACH 9!!!

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  99. Videorecorders sucks for this kind of operation by mynickwastaken · · Score: 1

    Why not using a Notebook with a USB camera? Why not capturing one frame every N second/minute an store it directly in an AVI?

  100. passing on the right by turbosk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm glad somebody brought this up. The one thing that incites me to "road rage" is the mf'ers in the "passing lane" who aren't passing anybody, just cruising. There is a special PLACE IN HELL for ppl who drive slow in the left lane.

    Where you live, is driving slow in the passing lane also a 5-point infraction, as it should be for parity's sake? If you're caught driving in the left lane and not passing anyone 20 times, do you lose your license? If not, there's no farking way right-side passing should be illegal.

    geez that felt good.

    fred

    1. Re:passing on the right by hummassa · · Score: 1

      Here's what: I, personally, don't pass the left-lane-snails by the right side, b ut I do honk and flicker the lights and yell 'till the asshole gets tired. And I'm persistent, I guarantee you.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    2. Re:passing on the right by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      The one thing that incites me to "road rage" is the mf'ers in the "passing lane" who aren't passing anybody, just cruising. There is a special PLACE IN HELL for ppl who drive slow in the left lane.

      Ever seen a State Trooper cruising along in the passing lane doing about 35 in a 65? THAT is what drives me insane. Are they just trying to see who has the balls to pass them or something? WTF?

      I recently passed a trooper who was doing just that and 30 seconds later he hit his lights and pulled me over! Fucking asshole. No ticket though, but he did call two canine units to search my vehicle (yes, I do look like a long haired hippy and no, after 45 minutes he didn't find anything but one pissed off citizen).

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    3. Re:passing on the right by BrianH · · Score: 1

      Impeding traffic is an infraction in California, but there's no "passing lane" law in this state anymore...they're all driving lanes. Since most Californian's are from somewhere else, this fact tends to annoy the hell out of people :)

      --

      There is nothing so pathetic as seeing a beautiful young theory roughed up by a tough gang of facts.
    4. Re:passing on the right by op00to · · Score: 1

      Funny, in NJ the State Troopers do the exact opposite!

      You'll be crusing on the NJ Turnpike doing about 75 in the right or center lane, and one of two things will happen:

      1. Trooper will come up behind you doing approx 90-100mph (no emergency lights), ride your bumper for about 15 seconds, then shoot into the left lane, and take off.

      2. Trooper is cruising up the left lane at 90-100mph, and blows by before you even have a chance to notice he's there.

      I've had both happen to me very frequently. There are a few troopers in NJ who have bumper stickers that say "Be Glad I'm Not Behind You!".

  101. Video reminds me of by ebob9 · · Score: 1

    All I could think about when watching the video was Rad Racer

  102. Does this remind anyone else... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    ... of Cruisin' USA, the arcade game? I guess it's the scenery and the speed that reminded me of it. Wow.. I have a headache now...

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  103. North Circular (London) at slightly slower speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Some friends and I made a similar timelapse video in March '03. We were filming the North Circular (A406) in London. I particularly liked the revolving adverts visible in these films, and the road markings came out nicely.

    Here are the North Cicular videos; also a page of Sights of the North Circular with some historic information.

    Unlike the OP, we used a webcam and stored our film directly on a laptop computer using some software called WinTLV (and a USB cable through the sunroof). We didn't do a lot of editing, though 5 seconds was snipped where we sat behind a milk lorry, and there is a join in the film where we stopped to wipe rain from the camera lens. Here are photos of filmmaking.

    We discussed doing a similar video in central London but didn't get around to it. Perhaps a site hosting these videos from all around the world could be fun.

    Enjoy!

  104. Most boring route by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    You obviously have never driven I-70 from Salina, KS to just outside Denver, CO.

    No hills. Few turns. Nothing but wheat fields for 300 miles.

    Every time I have to take that route, I think to myself "It CAN'T be as bad as I remember." About 2 hours in, I say to myself "Yes, IT CAN BE!"

    Even with 11G of stories on the MP3 player it drags.

    1. Re:Most boring route by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Just tie a rope to the steering wheel, put a brick on the gas pedal and climb in the back seat to take a nap.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  105. Interesting comparison by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I've never been Down Under, but I have driving in England. I found the motorways to be not much different than the interstates (other than the side of the road you are on, and on the divided highway/dual carriageway roads that isn't as much of an issue).

    True, when you get OFF the motorways onto the local roads things are different (and with 20+ years of driving on the right, it is NOT something I want to do when tired).

    Perhaps what needs to happen here is that somebody with good bandwidth needs to create a time-lapse road website, and folks can upload the video there.

    I'd have to run US160 from Medicine Lodge to Coldwater.

  106. Thought of doing this... by tasinet · · Score: 1

    Thought of doing something like this...
    and then I decided that it would probably take me over a month [23 Apr->2 Jun] to get the video done, so i said naah-fuck it.

    After all, my driving is not exactly role model.
    Come to think about it, the video would be enough to prosecute me!

    And, good thing he didn't have any accidents or incidents...
    [Imagine splatting a dog at mach9]
    Or did he?

  107. what a waste of time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must have no life.. seriously. this is about as entertaining as watching grass grow.

    1. Re:what a waste of time. by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      Thanks for giving me a new idea for another time-lapse project...

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  108. She lost! Re:Just be sure to turn your camera off by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Funny

    +4 insightful when she lost the case and had to pay legal fees? One word: precedent

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  109. not just americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Americans drive left-hand drive cars and drive on the right hand side of the road. I had to take travel sickness tablets after watching that."

    It's not just Americans. Most of the WORLD drives on the right. That's why driving on the left really is weird :P

    1. Re:not just americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but it's the CIVILISED world that drives on the left.

  110. Excellent! by AC5398 · · Score: 1

    This has to be the coolest thing I've seen in awhile!

    Kudos!

  111. Cool by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    This gives me an idea on how to finally use that X-10 camera I bought years ago. I chickened out on making the hidden camera in the girls locker room.

  112. Prior art! by dave3138 · · Score: 1

    I made something like this in 1998. Unfortunately, it's in RealMedia format. [does anyone know how to decompress it back to AVI?]
    I drove from Olivia, MN to Ely, MN. I had a 3com "Bigpicture" webcam on my dash, connected to an old VCR. This stuff was also powered by an inverter, as the author did.
    Here is a link to the video:

  113. Pride in Road Rage by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If anyone flashes me (UK) in this fashion I deliberately make their task of passing as difficult as possible. The flashing is normally accompanied by excessive speed, and tailgating.

    This is a profoundly Bad Idea. You're setting the stage for a deadly accident -- perhaps involving you, perhaps involving others.

    Pride in road rage is the Devil's work -- you're making the world a worse place for everyone to live. The world is bad enough already, without such needless provocation. Please think about the dreadful consequences of your actions.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Pride in Road Rage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      True, that. I'm guilty of behaving that way myself. Any time I gave in to such behavior it was followed by profound guilt and disbelief as to what I had done. It's never worth it. As bad as it feels to have someone "get the best of you" it will feel a million times worse if you kill someone getting your "revenge".

  114. I personally think motion blur would have helped by Thagg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Averaging together 50 frames instead of just throwing away 99 in 100 would have made a much smoother video. While you still have all of the frames on line, it might be interesting to try. Even better (for video) would have been creating the final output on fields (60 fps)

    Still, not to look a gift horse in the mouth -- it was a pretty cool video. Thanks!

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  115. For everything else there's /. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

    Burger and fries in Sacramento: 23 dollars
    Video Camera and VCR from Fry's: 52 dollars
    Watching your server melt: priceless

    --
    I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  116. Equipment used and how to mount? by schoolsucks · · Score: 1

    Could someone tell me what equipment was used to capture this? I know the website mentions a cheap Fry's camera, and a VCR, but could someone tell me what camera and how to mount it and connect it back to the VCR.

  117. Boring long-distance driving... by lewiz · · Score: 1

    Hell, after about three minutes I was beginning to tire of the video. By the sixth minute I was asleep.

    I'm glad I wasn't doing it in real-time!

  118. Re:Driving 'round Australia-Konigsberg Bridge prob by martinX · · Score: 1

    "Big country. Very boring."

    Quote from a Swedish motorcyclist who had ridden from Perth to Darwin.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  119. Don't Discard Frames; Compress the Trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he's discarding 99 out of 100 frames, he's losing a large amount of image data.

    A MUCH better way to do this would be to digitize the video of the entire trip, then output every other frame of the sequence to a new sequence (call it "A"), starting on frame 1. Then, do this again -- output a second sequence called "B," every other frame, but start it on frame 2. You end up with two sequences of "even" and "odd" frames, each half as long (and twice as fast) as the original. Load both sequences into a compositing program or batch processor, and make one sequence ("B") 50% transparent, on top of "A." Then, render this sequence as "C." You'll get a new sequence where each frame is composed of 2 of the original frames, blended together.

    Now, discard the original "A" and "B" sequences, and repeat the above process with the "C" sequence. Keep doing this until you get the final size you want. (If you start with a 10-hour sequence, after 7 "halving" iterations, you'll get a 9.375 sequence of blended/blurred frames, with dynamite motion blur that looks like warp drive.)

    Yes, I'm a professional 2D/3D computer graphics artist. :-)

    P.S. 25 years ago, some friends of mine and I shot Super-8 film from inside a car, with the camera pointing out the front windshield. I took 1 frame per second, which, when projected (with the 18 fps speed of Super-8), worked out to be 1080 mph, with the original car going 60 miles per hour. What's funny is, we went driving on country roads, then went back into the city (Springfield, MO), and pulled into a driveway, whereupon I immediately switched to regular speed. It looks like an amazingly fast (and smooth) deceleration from about Mach 3 to 5 miles per hour!)

  120. FreeCache? by magefile · · Score: 1

    Why isn't it on freecache? This kind of thing is exactly why they exist.

    On another note, will I still get carsick at Mach 9?

  121. Music from the video by electrichamster · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any idea what the music from the video is? It sounded like Crystal Method stuff, but its not....

    Help please?

    1. Re:Music from the video by murphro · · Score: 1

      More by The Crystal Method

  122. Star Trek Warp .005 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    6000 mile an hour ~= 1/5,000,000 C.
    Warp is the cube of light speed.

    1. Re:Star Trek Warp .005 by drjzzz · · Score: 1

      aha! the cube of light speed! That explains why a home made bumper sticker reading "Warp 0.0000001" appeared to confuse so many people. And here I though warp speed was simply the speed of light. No wonder those stars streak so badly at warp speed (though they didn't in the original Star Trek, oddly).

      --
      to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
  123. Route Nicknames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that most metro areas have nicknames for the major highways in the area. It works great for the locals, but most of the time the radio traffic reports use the nicknames and the map I have doesn't.

  124. ./ed by darkain · · Score: 2, Funny

    how about someone make a video of loading this site and speed it up 95x, so it appears that the site still loads fast?

  125. Re:Thanks WHAT?! by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    Heh, and condemn the poster for not GPLing everything they've ever done...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  126. Also, a defensive line... by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live about 2 miles west of Interstate 5 in So. California (right near disneyland). My understanding is that, in the event of a coastal attack, the plan is to fall back to the 5 as a defense line.

    Good plan, except that a couple million of us are between the 5 and the ocean...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Also, a defensive line... by cavebear42 · · Score: 1

      orange county, san franciso, and west la are all considered expendable. shame to lose the redwoods though.

  127. Re:Thanks WHAT?! by GQuon · · Score: 1
    [sarcasm]
    Yes, thanking people in posts is wrong, because it invites posts of the "Me too!" kind.
    To show appreciation, you should rather write a journal entry about it, or submit a poll:
    LA to Oregon video
    • Thanks!
    • Wast of space
    • Where's Oregon to LA?
    • CowboyNeal owns Oregon

    [/sarcasm] ..or maybe mirror or torrent his video for him.

    P.S. Remindes me of a British TV show (maybe KYTV)
    The setting was a TV anniversary:
    "Here's one of the segments made in those days: London to Brighton in three minutes." [Fast film shot from a train looking forwards, showing the rail and rushing in and disappearing behind us.]
    "And here's how that same train ride would look, today."
    [Fast film taken from regular news footage, showing passangers being assisted over rails by British Rail workers from a train with technical difficulties, carrying luggage and getting wet from the rain.]
    [Audience laughing.]
    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  128. Re:Driving 'round Australia-Konigsberg Bridge prob by Mateito · · Score: 1

    > "Big country. Very boring."

    I've driven the Nullabor... Sydney to Perth... and, yeah.. its a challenge.

    You get one fuel station every 300 clicks, that also serves as motel, restaurant, toile... and that's it. 300kms of sweet bugger all.

    There are only so many dead kangaroos you can count before you get sick of the site of them.

    The "Wedgies" are spectular tho. I never imagined that they were so huge! I guess its all the dead kangaroos they've been eating.

  129. Subliminal messages? by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    It occurred to me that an experiment like this would be the perfect situation to work in weird frames or subliminal messages because everything's blinking by so quickly you can hardly (or not at all) make out individual frames. Remember Fight Club and family films at the movie theater? Anyhow, since I don't feel like trudging the thing frame by frame, I submit to other /.ers: closely examine the scene at some convenience store around the 5:26 - 5:28 time marks.

    N.B., I'm not saying he had ulterior motives in making the film (he should get help if he did), but it's something to think about, anyhow.
  130. Checkpoint! by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Outrun on the C64. Cool music, annying game.

  131. Abyss Special Edition DVD Featurette time lapse-- by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    The Abyss Special Edition DVD has one of the coolest time lapses on it of them building the entire underwater base and filling the unused nuclear reactor that they built the set in with 7 million gallons of water. I also highly, highly, highly recommend renting/getting the special edition DVD and watching the hour long documentary Under pressure: Making The Abyss, even if your not a fan of the movie. You will be shocked and amazed at the lengths Cameron and his crew go to in order to make this film.

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  132. Downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now that the site is slashdotted, it will take longer to download and watch the movie than to drive from LA to Oregon.

  133. The roads are what worry me by rkuris · · Score: 1
    Take a look -- only about 5% of that trip were on roads that looked like they had been taken care of.

    Also, there's a bug in the video -- okay, a bug ON the video camera -- at the last fuel stop.

    ---

    --
    Get rid of everything Micro and Soft: Buy Viagra and/or Linux
  134. Central California depends on cars behind you by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
    If you're traveling in Central California around Big Sur or Monterey, on a two lane road, it's illegal to NOT pull over and let cars pass. I can't remember the threshold, but I think it's four cars. I've seen CHP pull over RVs that block all kinds of traffic.

    On a related note, this is EXACTLY why I like some of our other rules, such as not allowing semis (tractor trailers) in the left lanes. I had forgotten just how bad it could be until I drove from San Diego to St. Petersburg, Florida. I had a very hard time controlling my anger when two semis decided to ride side-by-side for 30 miles, during "somewhat medium" congestion traffic.

  135. Play it realtime 0.3 frame/sec with mplayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mplayer -fps 0.3 -rootwin -fs 2004Apr23_trip.avi

  136. Grandma is that you? by Nafai7 · · Score: 1

    LMAO, well duh, he was driving faster than the rest of the traffic on the road. The video would have been quite boring if all we saw the whole time was the back end of some 18-wheeler.

    It's not like there were long stretches where the right lane was unused. When there WERE such stretches, he did move over. I'd say he drove about the same as I do when I'm driving a relatively long distance with somewhat crowded highways.

  137. Anyone notice the Civic by Crouching+Turbo · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice the Civic that appears rather suddenly at 1:26 and quickly disappears? It's facing the camera so I figure this is pretty weird to have happen on the highway. I thought maybe I was imagining it so I just ignored it, but then later on the Civic shot shows up at the gas station at 2:10. Pretty weird, must've been a goof? Or a subliminal Civic advertisement?

  138. koyaanisqatsi by Thiago+Ize · · Score: 1

    If you like this you really should see koyaanisqatsi. It's got a lot of time-lapse photography and great phillip glass music.

  139. My dad did this in the '70s... by rewt66 · · Score: 1
    He had a Super8 movie camera that he single-framed once a second as we drove the freeways in LA. The part where we went around a cloverleaf in one of those big four-layer freeway junctions was pretty intense to watch. (As Super8 is normally 24 frames/second, that's (duh) a 24x speedup. So if we were doing 25 MPH around the cloverleaf, it looks like 600 MPH, which is a bit fast for a cloverleaf.)

    My dad also did a couple of movies of old, abandoned railroad grades. In these, he would move a certain number of steps before single-framing the camera. One time, there were a bunch of abandoned railroad ties still lying beside the track. Before each frame, we moved a few ties onto place on the abandoned roadbed, so it looked like the ties were being laid right in front of you as you went along. (It would have been even better to lay ties and rails, but we didn't have any rails...)

  140. Transportation Planner by bored_geek · · Score: 1

    In New England, our transportation planners were mostly cows. They didn't seem to care about passing or (being passed) in any lane.

  141. Right-side passing by Slowtreme · · Score: 1

    Right-side passing is "Passing on the right side of a vehice in a single lane", basically this only affects two things, motorcycles, and people who try to drive in the dirt.

    Passing slow left traffic in the middle or right traffic lane, in not against any law. It's actually in CVC 21659 that slower traffic is required to get out of the far left and middle lanes if they are not overtaking other cars.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    1. Re:Right-side passing by hummassa · · Score: 1

      Passing slow left traffic in the middle or right traffic lane, in not against any law.
      Here in Brasil, yes it is. Down here you can only pass another car by the left side (the driver's seat side, just like EU and USofA).

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  142. See more of the landscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be much cooler if the camera were mounted on top of the car and angled to one side so you could see more of the landscape.

  143. That settles it by Scurrilous+Knave · · Score: 1

    Okay, mach 9 or no mach 9, staring at the ass-end of an SUV is boring even at six minutes. That settles it for me--no more long-distance travel until they perfect matter transporters.

  144. VCR by heroine · · Score: 1

    Surprising that people still think VCR when they want to record video. After all the DVD recording, hard drive recording, flash recording, the VCR is still the first recording device you think of.

  145. I did something similar from Texas to California by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    ...except that I did it from Austin to Santa Monica, by way of eastern Utah and Colorado, so the scenery is pretty. Here's a link to it. It requires Divx5, I think. It's set to music and all that.

    The main difference in techniques, though, is that I did it the hard way, because my digital video camera did not have an intermittent record function, so I had to reach over after every song (3-5 minutes) and switch it on, record 5 seconds, then switch it back off. When the scenery was nicer, I recorded more frequently. Then I spent a week chopping it down in Premier. The result is pretty watchable, though it isn't as dramatic as taking intermittent images the whole drive. I did find out that my Canon DV45 can be turned on and off about 125 times without draining the battery completely, which is impressive. :-)

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
  146. A message from your hosting provider by MagicFab · · Score: 1

    Hello Dreamhost Customers,

    Some of you may have noticed overall network slowness. One of our sites was hosting large video files that were being heavily accessed. This caused slowness for a portion of our network, and additionally impacted the performance of some of our mail servers.

    We've disabled the site as of approximately 10am PDT. The problems began sometime during the early morning, though it's unclear exactly when.

    Everything should be back to normal now. Our apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

    Happy DreamHost Networking Team!

    ---
    The preceding was a Downtime announcement, sent 2004-06-02 10:51:26.

    You are receiving it via email because it is level 5 and your account is set to get announcements of that level via email.

    You can change that by visiting our web panel's announcement area at: https://panel.dreamhost.com/?tab=status&subtab=ann ounce

    Thank you for taking the time to read this announcement,

    The Happy DreamHost Announcement Team

    --
    Notepad specialist & FAT administrator, group training available
  147. Dreamhost's knees were shaking after all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I have some client sites on Dreamhost, and this email was recently sent out - I wonder what site they're talking about?
    ---
    Hello Dreamhost Customers,

    Some of you may have noticed overall network slowness. One of our sites was hosting large video files that were being heavily accessed. This caused slowness for a portion of our network, and additionally impacted the performance of some of our mail servers.

    We've disabled the site as of approximately 10am PDT. The problems began sometime during the early morning, though it's unclear exactly when.

    Everything should be back to normal now. Our apologies for any inconvenience this may have caused you.

    Happy DreamHost Networking Team!

  148. is that the same I-84 as out East? by caveat · · Score: 1

    I thought our I84 (i live in CT) only ran from boston to scranton - last time i was going to pittsburgh, 84 T'd into I-81 N/S, no further signs for 84 W. do the two connect?

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  149. Webcam and Laptop? by billstewart · · Score: 1
    If your digital camera can do that automatically, that's cool. I don't know what resolution you're doing that at - if you're using 100KB/picture, that's about 200MB for a 2000-mile trip, so it's feasible these days. (And if your resolution is much higher, you'd probably download to a laptop or something.)

    Another way to do this is to use your basic $29 webcam and connect it to a laptop. That gives you a bit more flexibility on frame rate and storage (assuming you've got a 12VDC adapter for your laptop, of course), and there's a fair amount of webcam software that can let you control that.

    So when are we going to start seeing webcams as standard hood ornaments?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Webcam and Laptop? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      Kodak DC290 is what I used.
      I used some JPG compression at 640x480. The idea was for video, so didn't need to be too big, and a little compression was ok since the frames go by quickly.
      About 50-100k each. The pics with lots of blue sky compress better!
      I was using a 128Mb card and uploaded to my laptop every few hours, then wiped it and started again.

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  150. Or see it in real time ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Claude LeLouche's C'etait un Rendezvous

    Real time. In Paris.

    There's a brief clip here -- the complete film (available on DVD) runs about 9 minutes.

    http://s73322911.oneandoneshop.co.uk/site/produc ts rend.html

  151. LA-speak by Atario · · Score: 1

    Correct. And nothing is more grating to the ears of a non-LA-area-er than to constantly hear "take the 405 to the 5 to the...". Well, except maybe the way LAers? inflect each noun phrase? to sound like a question?

    Only time we use "the" for highways up here (bay area) is when using (what I call) the quaint names: The Nimitz Freeway, The East Shore Freeway, The MacArthur Freeway, The Bay Shore Freeway.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  152. Game time! by WeblionX · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone else of Crusin' USA?

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  153. Barf... by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    Wow...talk about playing with my motion sickness. Feel like when I played Descent!!!

    Still--pretty cool...nice scenery here and there.

  154. Sarcasm by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    You dick! The proper way to be sarcastic is to use the Insert phrase here !!!!!

    You were using the Microsoft .NET sarcasm tag. Stop forcing your evil mono culture on me m$ fanboy!

    Now get with the program!

  155. Still only 30fps? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I see that while this is sped up 95x after being captured in real time, the frame rate is still 30fps.

    I would love to see the same footage but with only half as many frames discarded; ie 60fps. It would make for a much smoother 'ride'.

    It would only play on a computer, since your telly probably can't do 60fps non-interlaced, but the difference in visual quality would be staggerring.

    Of course, I can just re-encode the footage from this AVI to 60fps, but the resultant speed-up would be 190x, which is probably altogether too fast! I guess using MPEG motion estimation might allow me to interpolate frames, but I'm not sure how to do that in mencoder.

    I suppose if you were to post a high frame rate version, there is the slight issue that the smoldering remains of your server would not thank you if the file was twice as large.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Still only 30fps? by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

      that's why he used freecache and bittorrent. i don't think his hosting company's ISP would care too much for 10,000+ people trying to download a 135mb file all at the same time.

      --
      This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  156. Cool, but this man has by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    way Way WAY too much time on his hands.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  157. Throwing stuff at people behind me by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Man, if someone flashes me with headlights when they are trying to pass me, I either throw a bunch of stuff out the window at them, or, I immediately let them pass, then ride behind with my headlights on them for as long as I can, waving a pistol out the window at them. Assholes think they can push me around, wow, they gonna get shot!

    --
    This is my sig.
  158. Codec error. AVI sucks by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I get a "codec error" when I try to play it in Windows XP. Next time please use MPEG. AVI's are too buggy. I have had multiple problems with them on multiple machines.

  159. Re:Codec error. Then Download Codec Pack Here by cadence007 · · Score: 1

    I would suggest downloading a nimo codec pack.. usually the "lite" version is sufficient. nimo codec downloads