Slashdot Mirror


U2 iPod: Any Color You Want, As Long As It's Black

dave writes "Forbes is carrying the story that U2 and Apple will be releasing a custom black iPod that comes preloaded with the band's new album as well as portions of the band's 25-year back catalog. The custom iPod will be made available the same week as the new album, which is slated for release in the U.S. November 23rd. The article also talks about the larger deal which included the advertisement for iPod/iTunes and exclusive rights for iTunes to sell the album online for the first few weeks of release." skyshock21 adds a link to this article in Revolution Magazine.

489 comments

  1. Black Ipod? by SoTuA · · Score: 5, Funny
    Yay! No more white "mug me please" apparel!

    It comes with U2 preloaded? uughhhhh...

    1. Re:Black Ipod? by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is it bigger than the white iPod?
      That's what I hear, anyway.

    2. Re:Black Ipod? by eobanb · · Score: 4, Funny

      The most expensive U2 album yet.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    3. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      more importantly, it's how you use it.

    4. Re:Black Ipod? by ccharles · · Score: 1

      No, no... it still comes with white earphones :)

    5. Re:Black Ipod? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not if you count the cost of therapy incurred after listening to 1993's Zooropa

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    6. Re:Black Ipod? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Will it come with black earbuds too? They're really the most identifing part of the Ipod listener.

      --

      mbbac

    7. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the limp wrist and the lisp.

    8. Re:Black Ipod? by Ionizer7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is the same size, but just like black desktop computers, it is ALOT faster.

    9. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this word "alot" I keep seeing?

    10. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alot:lot::arise:rise

    11. Re:Black Ipod? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I have a thinkpad with yellow stripes and a custom yellow touchpoint. The performance is insane.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    12. Re:Black Ipod? by r2q2 · · Score: 1

      SAT prep? Cool, I wouldn't expect this on slashdot. Can you give me more?

      --
      My UID is prime is yours?
    13. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,

      I wish to complain on the stronglyest possible terms,
      about the post which you have just brodcast, about
      the Ipod users who wear womens' clothes. Many of my
      best friends have Ipods, and only a few of them are
      transvestites.

      Yours faithfully,
      Brigadier Sir Coward Anon Strong, Mrs.

      P.S. I have never kissed Cowboyneal

    14. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean it plays music at four times the speed and can play three songs at once? Multitasking! Speed! Power! ar... ar... ar...!

      iPod, here I come.

    15. Re:Black Ipod? by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Ugh! No kidding. I was a U2 fan until that dogpile came out. There were a couple interesting ideas on that CD, but most of it was absolutely unlistenable. "Ooh! Tape loops! With Eno! We are so cool we will singlehandedly reverse global warming!"

      Feh, now I have that damn disc in my head. I need to fire up October on my iPod to act as mental floss.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    16. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A rise" is two words. You would say "asitdown" would you???

    17. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:Black Ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG thats just like my Neon!!!

  2. This will be handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For pirating U2's next CD before it's official release!

    1. Re:This will be handy by phalse+phace · · Score: 1
      For pirating U2's next CD before it's official release!

      I could understand not bothering to RTFA, but the submitter clearly wrote, "The custom iPod will be made available the same week as the new album, which is slated for release in the U.S. November 23rd."

      In other words, the U2 iPod will be released when U2's new album is released.

    2. Re:This will be handy by tantalic · · Score: 1

      In other words, the U2 iPod will be released when U2's new album is released.

      Not necessarily true, as you quoted "The custom iPod will be made available the same week as the new album, which is slated for release in the U.S. November 23rd." (emphisis yours)

      So in other words the iPod will be released the same week as the album, since the album is released on a Tuesday this statement would be true if the iPod was released as early as Sunday.

    3. Re:This will be handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he meant the next release. Get the iPod on November 23rd, and when the tracks from the album after this one start hitting the p2p networks, he'll be ready.

    4. Re:This will be handy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you could only copy songs TO an iPod, and not FROM one. Is that not still the case?

    5. Re:This will be handy by decepty · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check the download section @ iPodLounge and you'll find a number of utilities that allow you to copy tracks FROM your iPod TO your PC / Mac / Fancy Abacus. You could also use a utility like BurnOut (sorry, can't find a link, but I believe it is also @ iPodLounge) and burn CDs directly from your iPod.

      --
      Be careful! Bears shouldn't consume large furry dogs.
    6. Re:This will be handy by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      Actually, an advanced copy of Vertigo was stolen from the band in france. It showed up in the p2p networks, which is maybe why U2 might sell it on iTunes before releasing it to CD.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    7. Re:This will be handy by redJag · · Score: 1

      You can use an iPod just like any other firewire hard drive.

    8. Re:This will be handy by Techie2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually it didn't show-up on P2P. Vertigo was released to radio at the end of September, and to iTunes at the same time. The stolen CD was recovered.

      --
      "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am." - Linus Torvalds
    9. Re:This will be handy by xrissley · · Score: 1

      I have no idea about the reality of this iPod, what will be on it, etc.
      But I can make enlighted guesses.

      Well, just take into account the fact that the music on the ipod will be AAC, and protected with FairPlay.
      In all logic, it will be in the playlist of the iPod. If you'd brought these songs back to your computer (as it is indeed possible, Apple never meant to make it impossible, just harder), you would not be able to play them on this very computer.
      But I assume that the iPod could/will be sold with a special activation code that will allow you to download the whole music from the iTMS, or that the songs also could be in the HD part (visible part) of the iPod and that you could copy them and then use a special code to activate them on your computer under your iTMS id.
      Let's bet Apple will have found a way to make this easy and seamless

      --
      =====
      I lie all the time, including now
  3. Colors by DoorFrame · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see a red ipod and I want it painted black...

    1. Re:Colors by Goonie · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I still haven't found what I'm looking for...

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    2. Re:Colors by kkovach · · Score: 0

      Actually, U2 has covered "Paint it Black" and it was pretty good.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    3. Re:Colors by sp0rk173 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      anything U2 "covers" is rape.

      But then again, I never was a real fan of them.

    4. Re:Colors by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      That's a hell of an oxymoron you got going there. U2 hasn't done anything worth listening to in ten years. An entire decade of forgettable pop crap.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    5. Re:Colors by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny
      Threads like this always remind me of my favorite fake letter to the editor in National Lampoon (back when it was still funny):

      Dear Sirs:

      Where the fuck are we now?

      Sincerely,
      Bono and The Edge
      Where the streets have no name
    6. Re:Colors by d_jedi · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that song by the Rolling Stones?

      --
      I am the maverick of Slashdot
    7. Re:Colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Who are the rolling stones?

    8. Re:Colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I remember reading that years ago..

    9. Re:Colors by kkovach · · Score: 1

      And I think that sucks ass as well.

      Boy, you were right. That was pretty easy to come up with.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    10. Re:Colors by kkovach · · Score: 1

      Ah hell. That should have been...

      And I think that *insert your favorite band here* sucks ass as well.

      Boy, you were right. That was pretty easy to come up with.

      - Kevin

      --
      The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act.
    11. Re:Colors by Henry+Bone · · Score: 1

      Your entitled to your opinion of course. But IMHO your wrong. "Walk On" is a great song dedicated to an extremely brave and determined woman. "Beautiful day" is an excellent tune. I reckon the whole of "all that you can't leave behind" is excellent. Before that there'd have to be at least a dozen songs I enjoy from there back catalogue.

    12. Re:Colors by Megane · · Score: 1
      I believe you have my stap^H^H^H^H iPod.

      /milton

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    13. Re:Colors by identity0 · · Score: 1

      It's alright, it's alright, it's alright - She moves in mysterious ways...

      about this new iPod, all I can say is, "Even better than the real thing..."

    14. Re:Colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you want to be marooned with your iPod.

      Did you here about the ship carrying red and black paint that crashed on the rocks, all the sailors were marooned...

    15. Re:Colors by eliotvb · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly, DoorFrame... I wrote a story with the subtitle "I see my iPod and I want it painted black" (for a story on color-ware, which paints iPods in 20 different colors: http://www.mp3.com/story/feature_colorme.html -evb mp3.com

    16. Re:Colors by Golias · · Score: 1

      Ask your grandparents.

      They might even have a few albums from the Rolling Stones they can loan you, but you will need a special antique playback device, which can only be plugged in to amplifiers specifically designed for its type of input, in order to listen to them.

      Some of these devices can spin the album at different speeds, and playing it at the incorrect speed can result in incorrect playback. If they loan you a full-length album, set the device to rotate 33 and one-third times per minute. You can recognize a full-length album because it's about the same size as those "Laser Disks" your parents used to watch before DVD's came out.

      Singles, on the other hand, are slightly larger than CD's and DVD's, and must be played at a higher speed: 45 revolutions per minute. I know it may seem strange that something so large can hold such a small amount of data, but such was the nature of storage systems back in those days.

      If the storage disks are in good condition, prepare to be astonished at what terrific sound quality can come from such ancient equipment.

      After that, maybe Grandpa can teach you how to actually throw a real football with your bare hands, just like the animated characters in Madden 2005!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    17. Re:Colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National Lampoon stopped being funny before U2 ever made an album.

  4. if only.. by Artie_Effim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    gawd, this would rock, that is if U2 didn't suck after they made Johsua Tree.

    1. Re:if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gee, too bad their best work came *after* the Joshua Tree.

    2. Re:if only.. by jav1231 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ooOOOOooo a discimitating ear!? I'm with ya, Bro.

    3. Re:if only.. by qweqazfoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can have my Achtung Baby album when you pry it from my cold, dead hands!

    4. Re:if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the one song they wrote and just modify slightly over and over again to fit the current pop craze? U2 is pulling an REM. Let's get away from what made us popular, become overly political, and alienate all of our fans.

    5. Re:if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Their best work FOR ME TO POOP ON came *after* Joshua Tree.

    6. Re:if only.. by Rev+Wally · · Score: 1

      So, you'd rather a band to sit and stagnate?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    7. Re:if only.. by ajayvb · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the rest of slashdot, but I love almost all of U2's work. They've definitely evolved as a band, and they're still relevant as songwriters and musicians. Maybe advocating "Peace on Earth" or Aung San Suu Kyi (Ref: "Walk On") isn't as 'relevant' as bashing the *AA on /. They're savvy as marketers. That shouldn't take away from the fact that they are great musicians.
      Oh, and I love their new single.

    8. Re:if only.. by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obligatory Onion headline: "Starving Africans make desperate plea to Bono"

    9. Re:if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is middle ground somewhere in there. I am not looking for a band to be like the Ramones where every song is exactly the same (you tell me the difference between Rockaway Beach and Rock and Roll High School) but I am also not looking for a band to do a complete 180 and abandon what made them great in favor of poppish, political drivel. And sometimes bands just need to cease to exist. Members need to move along to new groups. Tom Morello from Rage to Audioslave. Mayndard, et al. from Tool to A Perfect Circle.

    10. Re:if only.. by Rev+Wally · · Score: 1
      Sorry if my first post seemed a bit trollish, but ya hit a nerve with REM. (Great, now I'm off topic) Personally, I think New Adventues In Hi Fi is probably the best REM record since they signed with WB, and definately in the top 5, because it is different. U2 has not gotten more political, they've always been political (Sunday Bloody Sunday, In the Name Of Love, New Years Day, pretty much any other song pre Joshuua Tree).

      and besdes, the two examples you gave of members moving on (Audioslave pisses me off more than Rage and soundgarden Combined, Maynard doing Tool-lite, while still doing Tool), not exactly the best.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    11. Re:if only.. by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. I think U2 is maybe one of the only bands making music today that will still be popular in 10 years. I'm not a huge fan; I just don't think my generation is producing many bands with Rolling Stones/Beatles popularity.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    12. Re:if only.. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Rev, if you install JiffyDOS on your C64, you can load your sig MUCH faster and with fewer keystrokes, too!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    13. Re:if only.. by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      Neither did your parents' generation, nor theirs, etc.

      Every generation only produces a few amazing bands.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    14. Re:if only.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: They had one song they modified slightly over and over again until they made Joshua Tree. After that, they tried experimenting with songs that did all kinds of crazy things, like using more than three chords, and playing guitar riffs with more than one note!

      Also, U2 and REM were always extremely political, and that is what made them popular. It certainly wasn't their musicianship. Both bands took almost 10 years after becoming nationally known to learn how to even play their instruments.

      When U2 was formed, Adam Clayton was hired because they liked his hair. The Edge was going to be the singer, because they hated Bono's voice, but since the Edge learned how to play a single guitar chord, he became the lead guitarist, and Bono was given a second audition to be the singer. He had a bad cold during that second audition, and the whole band agreed that he sounded slightly better than the first time they heard him.

      Don't take my word for it... Go look up the band's own comments, which is where I learned all this. They started out without knowing how to play at all, and just banged away at it over the decades until they gradually mastered the craft (with considerable help from Brian Eno.)

  5. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Black now, full spectrum next by slimak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does this mean that we may be able to get serveral colors in the near future? Blue iPod? OR, will other Apple products ship in black? Something about a shiny black iBook seems cool to me.

    1. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by tanguyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something about a shiny black iBook seems cool to me.
      paint. not just for sniffing anymore.

      --
      #!/usr/bin/english
    2. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      For some reason I kept seeing screenshots or rendered images of a black iPod with red backlighting on the buttons. It was around the release of the latest iPods. I'm sure the image was edited but it looked pretty cool.

    3. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by mikeylebeau · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want a shiny black iBook now, just check out ColorWare, they'll do it for you.

    4. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that was a picture of an iPod in the dark, showing off the red backlighting on the buttons. I don't think the iPod itself was painted black.

    5. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is what i wanted. Had they put an ipod out in black and red, I would have bought one. But, no, they put them out in lame colors like pink and light puke green. Fuck that man, I want black and red.

    6. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard the soon-to-come upgraded minis will include new colors.

    7. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I both love you and hate you now. I wasn't going to buy any of these damned things, but .. some of those colors make them even sexier.. Damnit, no, I can't afford them. I hate you, your entire point was to tease me, wasn't it?

    8. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I remember a story a while back about an interesting patent Apple had filed (if someone wants to do the legwork, by all means...) a patent for a device that lets you change the color through LEDs or something like that. This would in theory let you change the color of the case of all their computers and the iPod, and would be a much better seller than just one color.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    9. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by BashDot · · Score: 1

      While your post is quite funny, paint is not the way to go when altering the color of plastic. It will chip off eventually. Vynil dye is supposed to be the best method of coloring plastic. It soaks into the plastic and supposedly won't show scratches.

    10. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would recommend taking a blowtorch to it lightly. Blowtorch (or even a standard lighter, but it will take much longer and might burn your finger) to plastic will blacken it. Of course, by the time you're done, it may no longer work. But it will be black.

    11. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Good for apple, but they can take their low-playback quality and shove it as far up their colonic sphincter as possible. They lost my business as a music player manufacturor by appealing more towards fashion and trendiness than actual useful features. I want to play ogg, i want be able to play FLAC if the need arises. I want playback to be as good as possible. the iPod doesn't do this. The Rio Karma does, so i got that instead. And it's working plenty fine for me as I type this.

    12. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by poptones · · Score: 2, Funny
      ColorWare's Business Services are designed for company's that wish to have their products in color.

      Maybe if enough people buy these things the proprietors will be able to afford themselves an edumucation...

    13. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Bastian · · Score: 1

      It's true! I like to use it as a chaser.

    14. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest taking a look at their website again and reading it more carefully.

    15. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by 87C751 · · Score: 1
      ...lets you change the color through LEDs or something like that.
      Sounds great. Now all I need is a kit with black LEDs.
      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    16. Re:Black now, full spectrum next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPods play FLAC as well as AIFF, and AAC is superior to ogg-vorbis in sound, although not in Stalmanist purity, so my saying so is clearly blaspheme

  8. Do exclusive marketing things work? by indros13 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think it's a neat kind of promo, but what about the black-loving non-U2 fan? Will the price be higher?

    Also, any word on how successful these kinds of exclusive marketing deals are? I've noticed that Best Buy does a number of these exclusive marketing tricks. Any evidence to suggest that they actually work? (i.e. substantially boost sales, brand loyalty, etc)

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    1. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think it's a neat kind of promo, but what about the black-loving non-U2 fan? Will the price be higher?

      Probably only about $3.49 higher.

    2. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by crabpeople · · Score: 0, Troll

      "but what about the black-loving non-U2 fan? Will the price be higher?"

      1. buy black ipod with u2's new cd preloaded
      2. delete u2's new cd
      3. punch yourself in face for racing to post so quickly and therefore avoiding the step of THINKING

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    3. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by meme_police · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you know the price of the U2 Edition perhaps you should do #3? What part of "Will the price be higher?" do you not understand?

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    4. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I don't have actual numbers to back me up, but as I work in marketing/advertising, perhaps I can explain how this is valuable beyond the sales or loyalty.

      You see, what this does is give Apple and U2 an excuse to get a LOT of free press. Thats one of the primary reasons you see so many of these. It gets them in the headlines, which in turn might boost sales or build brand loyalty.

      The real measure would be to calculate the cost of how much free advertising they're going to get from this, which I imagine would be a pretty substantial figure.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Quash · · Score: 1

      Best Buy did do a deal like this with the Rolling Stones. But, they carried their product exclusively. It so angered music retailers that many dumped the whole Stones back catalogue (read: huge financial hit). I'm actually surprised Vertigo single is for sale on iTunes. If it's not also on sale in the stores as a single, that could be causing some problems. And U2 could never get away with releasing the full album to only iTunes first with retailers to follow. They'd get killed.

    6. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by mcdesign · · Score: 1

      Downloaded songs from places like iTunes are a few percentage of physical media sales. So expect the album to be exclusive to iTunes for downloading but it will be business as usual for CD retailers.

    7. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but as I work in marketing/advertising

      Then I think I can speak for the rest of the world and say: FUCK OFF AND DIE!!!

    8. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I dunno. Nintendo does a lot of random bundling and limited colors, there was a GameCube with the first four Zelda games on a disc. Currently, it is a GC with Metroid Prime.

      I am interested in the black iPod and I do like a lot of what U2 has made, now the only question is the asking price.

    9. Re:Do exclusive marketing things work? by Eccles · · Score: 1

      You see, what this does is give Apple and U2 an excuse to get a LOT of free press.

      ...such as, say, a /. story.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  9. I refuse to call it black by whoda · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, where can I pick up one of these African-American IPods anyway?

    1. Re:I refuse to call it black by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

      where the streets have no name?

      [/sorry]

    2. Re:I refuse to call it black by papasui · · Score: 1

      Believe that would be black Irish.

    3. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean African-American Irish

    4. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the term is 'ipod of color', you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The official Apple Term is iBlack. It's expected to be popular in pro sports.

    6. Re:I refuse to call it black by pangloss · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The Irish are the blacks of Europe; Dubliners are the blacks of Ireland; and Northside Dubliners are the blacks of Dublin...so say it once and say it loud: I'm black and I'm proud!"

    7. Re:I refuse to call it black by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      So, where can I pick up one of these African-American IPods anyway?

      I'm really not sure, but I get the impression that U2 wouldn't be the artist of choice for most African American users anyway. Maybe a deal with Kanye West?

    8. Re:I refuse to call it black by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      you mean iRish.

    9. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean McProud?

    10. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O'Proud?

    11. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a more serious note, what is the correct term to call black people in the US?

      African-American seems pretty offensive to me. Just because my ancestors were from Europe, I don't want to be called European-Canadian. I find that much more offensive than "white".

      I'm in Canada and we don't stress about things like that so much here, but it seems like using the wrong term in the US is a great way to get labelled a racist (or murdered)

    12. Re:I refuse to call it black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a great movie

  10. It had to be said... by afish40 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's like, how much more black could this be? and the answer is... none. None more black."

    --
    Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    1. Re:It had to be said... by JWW · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... but can you turn the volume up to 11?

    2. Re:It had to be said... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      ... but can you turn the volume up to 11?

      Spinal Tap references aside, actually you can: the iPod's volume amp is a little higher most consumer electronic devices. Rumor has it that because Steve Jobs is slightly hard of hearing, he insisted on the extra volume.

      It got them in trouble in France as French/EU regulations prohibited audio devices playing above a certain dB.

    3. Re:It had to be said... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Hey, come on, this is still an iPod, I am sure "It's almost like a pastel black..."

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    4. Re:It had to be said... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1


      You see and this is why this promotion "Missed it by THAT much"

      It should have come preloaded with Spinal Tap's new album or even better their whole catalog.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    5. Re:It had to be said... by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Funny
      .. but can you turn the volume up to 11?
      I don't get it.
    6. Re:It had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's from the movie "This Is Spinal Tap". In the movie, the rock group's new album gets an all-black cover (this was actually the true inspiration for, among other things, Metallica's Black Album). The guitarist is proud of his amplifier that has volume knobs that have maximum setting of 11 instead of 10, so it's "one louder" than every other amp.

    7. Re:It had to be said... by TommydCat · · Score: 1

      Was this new album recorded in doubley?

      --
      This comment does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the author.
    8. Re:It had to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Did you see his user name?

    9. Re:It had to be said... by afish40 · · Score: 1

      It's like space without the stars.

      --
      Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
    10. Re:It had to be said... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      There's a fine line between clever and stupid.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    11. Re:It had to be said... by polecat_redux · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that because Steve Jobs is slightly hard of hearing, he insisted on the extra volume.

      I was under the impression that Jobs needed the extra volume to help drown out the flashbacks.

    12. Re:It had to be said... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that because Steve Jobs is slightly hard of hearing, he insisted on the extra volume

      Rumor has it that because Steve Jobs insisted on extra volume, he is slightly hard of hearing :)

  11. U2: Of course it only comes in black... by Tackhead · · Score: 1, Funny

    ..but the Estate of Francis Gary Powers wants royalties!

    1. Re:U2: Of course it only comes in black... by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      at least it wasnt preloaded with back in the USSR...

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
  12. Any color you want by mikeylebeau · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could also get your iPod colored however you want from ColorWare.. or buy one pre-colored from them direct. Looks pretty cool.

    1. Re:Any color you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. $50-65 on top of an already expensive mp3 player... Bet they don't get too many sales...

      Not that they don't look awesome, but damn is that expensive.

    2. Re:Any color you want by pknoll · · Score: 1
      You could also get your iPod colored however you want from ColorWare. or buy one pre-colored from them direct. Looks pretty cool.

      Yeah, but they paint the click wheel, too. That... seems wrong. I'd love to see one done that leaves the wheel itself grey; just the white parts done in black.

    3. Re:Any color you want by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You could also get your iPod colored however you want from ColorWare.. or buy one pre-colored from them direct. Looks pretty cool.
      if you have enough money to buy an ipod, and have enough money and brains to buy a pre-colored black ipod from colorware, then i have some interesting business propositions for you.

    4. Re:Any color you want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people can spend $300 (at least) on their sunglasses, or jeans or shoes, why can't someone who is tech-oriented spend a little more to make a fashion statement?

      Just because we're geeks doesn't mean we can't have things look nice ;)

      (Admittedly though, it is too much money for me - but I can see why people would go for it... white looks cheap (I say that as an owner of an iBook))

    5. Re:Any color you want by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      Or, you can get an iPod mini encrusted in crystals:

      http://www.crystalmini.com/crystalmini3.html

  13. This thing is really cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The black letters on black background display might be a little tough to read, but it might count as one of the first real monochrome (mono = one) displays. I like the black play/FF/etc arrows printed on the black case, too.

    1. Re:This thing is really cool. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, I think the black iPod should come preloaded the complete musical library of Disaster Area instead.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    2. Re:This thing is really cool. by Kosi · · Score: 1

      But where to buy the headphones suited for this kind of music? Not seen any with 3 Gigawatts yet.

  14. Downhill battle... by inkdesign · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "U2 and Interscope will split a standard royalty for each song downloaded (about $0.60 per download), plus an upfront licensing fee."

    Good to know SOMEBODY is getting something approaching a (more) fair cut of online royalties...

    1. Re:Downhill battle... by pknoll · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Good to know SOMEBODY is getting something approaching a (more) fair cut of online royalties...

      This is what it will take, I think. A big-name band like U2 or Pearl Jam, maybe REM, saying "screw the system, we're going straight to digital".

      Once it's shown that the electronic distribution model can work - and it may take a big name to try it and see - others will follow suit.

    2. Re:Downhill battle... by spuke4000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out this link, as posted on slashdot a couple of days ago. The bottom of the article has a break down of where the money for a $16 album goes. $1.60 goes to the artist, which when you look at the other costs seems like a 'fair cut' to me.

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
    3. Re:Downhill battle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "screw the system, we're going straight to digital"

      You mean they've been releasing all their albums so far on vinyl?

    4. Re:Downhill battle... by inkdesign · · Score: 1

      Well, the intial comment was in reguards to online royalties, so that break down doesn't really apply. Even still, its disturbing that you find it "fair" that the label makes more profit than the artist who created the music. ($1.60 vs. $1.70)

    5. Re:Downhill battle... by Proney · · Score: 1

      I'd bet against Pearl Jam -- they still have vinyl releases of their albums ;)

      --
      require "something.clever";
    6. Re:Downhill battle... by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 1

      How in the hell is getting a physical device considered "electronic distribution". No matter what mechanism put that music on the iPod you have to get that device to the customer some how and that distibution model is not electronic.

      The "electronic distribution model" is what Todd Rungren and others have been doing for years. Bands that sell the iso image of a disk that you electronicly download and burn yourself is the "electronic distribution model".

    7. Re:Downhill battle... by jnik · · Score: 1
      The bottom of the article has a break down of where the money for a $16 album goes. $1.60 goes to the artist

      Initially, yes. Then from that $1.60 comes all of the money that the label figures the artist owes--usually including, for example, the cost of music videos and the like (despite that "marketing/promotion" line, performers often carry a huge share of that cost, and the labels decide how it's spent. Yes, the labels choose how much of and how to spend the artists' money....).

      So don't forget good old creative bookkeeping.

    8. Re:Downhill battle... by clifyt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is that?

      Its the label taking the risk, not the artist.

      Remember the key word is ARTist. They make art. Art is not something that should be liked by all and viewed at as a consumable, but to be relevant it must be liked by a certain percentage of the population.

      A true artist would simply give the art away as long as he could afford to sustain himself.

      Instead, the artist goes to a label that knows 9 times out of 10 the artist is not going to be a profit center for it, and signs them anyways. These labels bank on the law of averages that says that if they cover enough bases, they will eventually hit gold (and hopefully platinum).

      Past that, guys like me like to get paid. I work in the back grounds for artists and someone has to pay me and folks like me. I've done it both ways -- I've been paid from the artist and I've been paid by the label. Wanna know who's screwed me less? The labels. When working on points (or mere fractions of points in my case), the label will lay out all the figures and statistics. The artist will always claim they haven't sold enough to pay any of us, even right after bragging to the girl next to you that they sold billions.

      If you actually had a clue as to what it took to put out a commercial grade album these days, you wouldn't be so harsh on the labels. Then again, if I was recording on my own again (i.e., not in a backing capacity), I too would be bitching about not getting paid enough...thats the nature of capitalism...we all think we deserve more.

    9. Re:Downhill battle... by Obispus · · Score: 0
      I don't see why it should be fair. Nobody said "split in equal parts"
      "U2 and Interscope will split a standard royalty for each song downloaded (about $0.60 per download), plus an upfront licensing fee."
      Good to know SOMEBODY is getting something approaching a (more) fair cut of online royalties...
    10. Re:Downhill battle... by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "U2 and Interscope will split a standard royalty for each song downloaded (about $0.60 per download), plus an upfront licensing fee."

      Good to know SOMEBODY is getting something approaching a (more) fair cut of online royalties...


      Any artist that signs on with Magnatune gets a guaranteed 50% of any sale. That's 50% straight to the artist, not splitting a ~60% royalty with Apple.

      They're getting reasonable numbers of artists signing on too. Magnatune really is the best online music seller I've encountered.

      Jedidiah.

    11. Re:Downhill battle... by funkdancer · · Score: 1

      the above really should be modded up as insightful.

      --
      ISO certified == THX certified
    12. Re:Downhill battle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, do you even read the threads you post on?

    13. Re:Downhill battle... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Your quote could be taken in several ways, none of which imply that the band will receive a greater portion of the royalties than normal.

      Interscope is the label, not the lead singer. And for all we know, the split in question could be $.59 to Interscope, $.01 to the band.

      Not that the band in question is hurting for cash. Obviously they have enough money already, as evidenced by the band having a longer lifespan than Dick Clark. Every time a new U2 album comes out, I find myself asking why. You'd think all the crap albums they've made in the past decade would have more than made up for anything of quality that they produced in the decade before that.

    14. Re:Downhill battle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your assuming here that anyone still remembers pearl jam and rem.....is michael stype still alive? I thot he had just become reanimated the last time I saw him. And has eddie vedder finally achieved his lifetime goal of actually becoming jim morrison or is he still putzing around with it?

    15. Re:Downhill battle... by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      If you actually had a clue as to what it took to put out a commercial grade album these days, you wouldn't be so harsh on the labels.

      One lousy dance track sandwiched between 14 tracks of filler, a bottle blonde bimbo, and a bunch of payola?

  15. Obligatory Spinal Tap reference by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but is it None More Black?

  16. Another marketing tactic by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are we seeing a new marketing tactic in the horizon?

    Eg Buy a DVD Recorder with LOTR extendeder version preloaded? Or TiVo with 10 seasons of Friends?

    Oh! It'll be fun if iPod's preloading Beatles songs...

    1. Re:Another marketing tactic by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 1

      Considering the Beatles won't let their music out in a digital format...I think not.

    2. Re:Another marketing tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There are no Beatle's CDs? Or are they all on analog CDs, like Laserdisc?

    3. Re:Another marketing tactic by Proteus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      the Beatles won't let their music out in a digital format
      Funny, I own several Beatles albums on CD. Last I checked, CDDA stands for Compact Disc Digital Audio and is, as the name implies, a digital format.

      Or perhaps you meant that the Beatles won't allow their songs to be sold in a compressed, lossy, digital format?
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    4. Re:Another marketing tactic by D3 · · Score: 1

      Not only are they on CD, hence digital. The Beatles don't control the rights to their songs! Michael Jackson bought them all years ago. That is why we got those Nike commercials with the "Revolution" song.

      --
      Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    5. Re:Another marketing tactic by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, CDDA is a compressed, lossy, digital format :P

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    6. Re:Another marketing tactic by eldimo · · Score: 1

      It's been done already. I remember seeing at my Wall-Mart a DVD player (one of those cheap one from Taiwan) that came with an exclusive sneak peek of the Two Towers during the summer of 2002. I cannot find a link to this right now (try searching for LotR DVD on Google. You won't find something interesting!)

    7. Re:Another marketing tactic by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Not quite. I think Yoko still owns a few of them. I remember reading about a dispute over how the song writing credits for "Hey Jude" or "Yesterday" would go. Whether it should be listed as (Lennon/McCarthy) or (McCarthy/Lennon). Yoko had something to do with this. Please correct me if I'm wrong!

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    8. Re:Another marketing tactic by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Michael Jackson owns the publishing rights to most of the Beatles' library not the actual recordings. He can control (or 50% control with Sony now) who covers the songs and who uses them in ads but he can't control the recordings. For those who don't know there are two copyrights on songs - the recording and the music itself.

    9. Re:Another marketing tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to say if you're trolling, stupid, or trying to be funny and failing. Since when is CD audio compressed and lossy? Things are stranger than I thought in the UK!

    10. Re:Another marketing tactic by Proteus · · Score: 1

      *Sigh*.

      CDDA is not a compressed format. Some sound engineers compress the audio -- that is, they reduce the distance between the loudest and quietest samples -- but that is not a format issue. It's a mixing issue. Formats such as MP3 and ogg are compressed in that the data is compressed.

      CDDA is not a "lossy" digital format. Whatever is digitally recorded can be transferred to CDDA without loss. Just because the waveform is digitally sampled and therefore some recording data is "lost" doesn't make it lossy -- unless you want to go ahead and call all media lossy, including analog.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    11. Re:Another marketing tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joseph McCarthy wrote for the Beatles?

      News to me at least

    12. Re:Another marketing tactic by Reducer2001 · · Score: 1

      Damn it! That should have been McCartney.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    13. Re:Another marketing tactic by statusbar · · Score: 1

      When did you last check that CDDA is a compressed, lossy, digital format???! What compression do you think CDDA has?

      Unless you are referring to 16 bit audio, 44.1 khz as 'compressed' and 'lossy'? Maybe compared to 24 bit/96 Khz?

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    14. Re:Another marketing tactic by tji · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Or TiVo with 10 seasons of Friends?

      That's a good idea.. I recently got an HD Tivo, and it had 250GB of empty space that could have been used for sample content.

      It could allow for a better user experience, otherwise you have to wait several days for the Tivo to build up a list of programs captured. It could also kickstart the Tivo learning process by providing many programs for the user to rate. If they threw in a couple of more valuable items, like pay-per-view movies, or HBO movies, it would be even more effective.

      They could probably even get companies to pay them for the privilege.. I'm sure the networks would love the opportunity to pre-load the pilot episode of their programs on Tivos to make it easy for people to greatly increase the chance that viewers give it a chance.

      Even a couple sample HDTV programs would be nice to show off the 1080i video and Dolby Digital 5.1 audio capabilities of the unit..

    15. Re:Another marketing tactic by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was just being pedantic, sadly Slashdot stripped out my /pedant tag. By definition, any recording fails to capture the full range, hence is lossy, point taken that it then isn't technically compressed except in terms of sampling loss (recording is smaller than a perfect analogue copy - which is impossible as far as I can tell)

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    16. Re:Another marketing tactic by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Quite possibly. In fact, I think its inevitable as this is a good way to help hinder piracy. Its a lot harder to pirate something where you have no physical copy, and the hardware is locked down. Not saying it wouldn't happen still, but it would definitely make it more difficult.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    17. Re:Another marketing tactic by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      All recording media is lossy, when the source material is the real world. On a CD you get an imperfect, partial representation of the real world sound -- and an imperfect partial representation of the higher-fidelity master recording. However, copying CD-quality data to CD-quality data (another CD, FLAC, lossless WMA, etc) is a lossless process.

    18. Re:Another marketing tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of which is great, but is also fairly time-dependent. That is, if the systems are manufactured and then not sold for six months, the "PPV" movie will not only be off of PPV but be on home video by then.

    19. Re:Another marketing tactic by burns210 · · Score: 1

      TiVo with 10 seasons of Friends....

      A tivo with a multi-terabyte raid 0 array built-into a settop box that plugs into my TV for saving digital recordings... Oh my, there is a god.

    20. Re:Another marketing tactic by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Well, another interesting point to note is that most of the money he has borrowed has been loaned to him by Bank of America with the Beatles Library to back the loan up. So give it enough time and BofA will have it. At which point they will sell it to the highest bidder to cover Michael's lifestyle.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
    21. Re:Another marketing tactic by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well unless they are playing live right in front of you with absolutely no electronics at all like microphones, guitar amps, keyboards etc.. then everything is considered lossy by your definition. The microphones have specific frequency characteristics as does all of the electronics upto and including the speaker and the room you are in, are you considering that lossy as well?
      So what does an electric guitar sound like without an amplifier or electronics? I'd bet you'd have to hold it up to your ears to hear it over the drums.

      Yes, digital might not be able to capture the perfect analog wave form but the conversion from analog to digital (wherever it may occur in the mixing or production process) is not the weak link or anywhere near the most degrading portion in the whole process of getting it to your ears in your house on your equipment.
      10 years ago and before I'd say the home users equipment or the fact that the orginal analog recording of the musical piece was the limiting factor in the chain. Sorry but you can not make the Jimmy Hendrix studio recordings that are left any better then what they currently are without bring him back from the dead. In more recent times I'd say the mixing process where "louder and higher levels" seem to be the trend although they causing clipping or need extensive dynamic compression to "fit" or again, the home stereo is the limiting factor. None of theses can be blamed on the the analog to digital conversion process.

      I'd like to know how to make perfect analog copy that you reference ;)

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    22. Re:Another marketing tactic by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      last time i checked you were wrong. CDDA is waveform data with an amount of metadata as well.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    23. Re:Another marketing tactic by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      That idea is pure genius. Imagine if it came with half a season of the Soprano's in HD already. I think the uptake on HBO subscriptions would be incredible.

    24. Re:Another marketing tactic by dduck · · Score: 1

      Take it to the next level: Allow the buyer to pre-configure it with a wide selection of popular series (Simpsons, Alias, The Shield, Alias..) + pre-release the new episodes online to the box by a few hours to improve the coolness factor...

    25. Re:Another marketing tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are we seeing a new marketing tactic in the horizon?
      Eg Buy a DVD Recorder with LOTR extendeder version preloaded? Or TiVo with 10 seasons of Friends?


      Or buy a computer and the hard disk comes loaded with crappy media players, crappy music, crappy games, and ISP sign-up programs? Yup, could be the dawn of a new age...

  17. This seems quite appropriate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have read that the MP3 player market will be larger than the music content industry both in terms of revenues and profits within the next four years.
    So, the obvious trend would be for the player manufacturers to work directly with the bands and eliminate the conventional content industry.
    But may the gods help us if Apple likes U2.

  18. Re:Finally! by LemonFire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm just waiting for iPods to come out with album covers on them as well (like cell phone covers). I'm sure it will happen.

    -- Press the "any" key to play this SIG

  19. A $300 rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Wow a $300 rock album"

    and when the battery dies, it becomes a $300 rock.

    1. Re:A $300 rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when that happens, you just do the same thing you'd do with any other mp3 player: change the battery.

  20. Note to p2p users by dougnaka · · Score: 4, Funny
    Please note that you are NOT allowed to distribute this file online during its iTunes exclusive rights phase.

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  21. On a semi related note... by IronMagnus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Instead of mac apple and beatles apple fighting.. why don't they team up and sell a version of the white ipod with an apple graphic on the wheel thats pre-loaded with the beatles' white album.. the marketing writes itself.

    1. Re:On a semi related note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because everyone that wants it already has the white album?

      better off putting on a new album for this sort of ploy. (atleast in my opinion.)

    2. Re:On a semi related note... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Instead of mac apple and beatles apple fighting.. why don't they team up and sell a version of the white ipod with an apple graphic on the wheel thats pre-loaded with the beatles' white album.. the marketing writes itself.

      Because if the marketing is writing itself Apple Computer can't sell more PowerMacs to their ad agency (:

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:On a semi related note... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      With that then, Apple *could* release a white iPod! Fuck me hard with your grandma's walking stick I'm saving up my money right now!

    4. Re:On a semi related note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be ridiculous, we still buy lots and lots of stuff from Apple.

  22. Beatles Lawsuit? by the+pickle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As noted yesterday on As the Apple Turns, this could have some ramifications for the lawsuit, as Apple Computer is going to be shipping physical media with pre-recorded songs on it. The argument up to this point was that Apple Computer had never shipped any physical media containing songs (Barenaked Ladies music videos on the Mac OS 8+ system CDs notwithstanding), and thus wasn't in violation of the previous agreement with Apple Records.

    I'm curious to see what the Beatles'/Apple Records' lawyers will say about this.

    p

    1. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by djh101010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm curious to see what the Beatles'/Apple Records' lawyers will say about this.

      Well, Apple Computers has continued to do what they agreed not to do, time after time, and continues to give money to Apple Corps, LTD because of it. All I can figure is that it's considered a "cost of doing business" and is factored in already. I can't personally see why U2 of all groups would be what they'd do this with - why not work _with_ The Beatles and release an iPod with the Beatles catalog on it? Now _that_, I would buy, and pay a premium for even (since I own the whole thing in several formats already). Hell, the Beatles collectors would probably buy a ton of these, leave 'em unopened, and so on. What better than a sale with no support costs post-sale? Seems like a natural to me...

    2. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by PunkPig · · Score: 1

      The 1st Gen Dual USB iBook that I purchased a few years ago had about 600 MB of mp3s on it. Does that count as physical media?

    3. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by jpetts · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Apple Computer actually seems to have a sense of humour about these things: sosumi

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    4. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Screw working with them. Just friggin' buy the entire Beatles catalog! They have more than enough money for it...and they could guarantee iTMS was the only online store ever to have Beatles material. They could do whatever they wanted with special collector's edition Beatles iPods, too. (Which, by the way, I think is a great idea.)

      p

    5. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by iphayd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, that is completely false. When iTunes first came out, Apple shipped all consumer Macs with a variety of songs in a "iTunes Sampler". This was prior to the iTMS.

    6. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Why not just the WHITE album? They wouldn't have to bother with new paint.

      Tim

    7. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Who the fuck said it's for sale? Dumbass.

    8. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think a computer counts as 'physical media'.

    9. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they did get into a bit of trouble when the first mac's with speakers shipped.

    10. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F**K the Beatles.

    11. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by babbage · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There's bravery for ya -- anonymously self-censoring the word "fuck".

      Heh...

    12. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

      There are naked women on the Mac OS 8 system CD?! That's it! I'm finally going to make the switch!

    13. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not work _with_ The Beatles

      Because we've all got all the Beatles music we want - or we cant afford it. Personally I can take or leave the beatles - but either way I already have had YEARS to go out there and buy their music.

      U2 has a new CD out - and so have some hype and promo to do. Also, Jobs and Bono can share a stage and bufty on about how crackin the iPod is for listening to this crackin new music on.

      Paul McCartney is about what... a hundred. Ringo is mental and thinks hes a train. And the rest of them are dead.

    14. Re:Beatles Lawsuit? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Because we've all got all the Beatles music we want - or we cant afford it. Personally I can take or leave the beatles - but either way I already have had YEARS to go out there and buy their music. U2 has a new CD out

      Maybe you haven't noticed because you're listening to U2 for crying out loud, but the Beatles catalog on CD has had more releases in the last 5 and 10 years than U2 has. Just being half-dead doesn't mean they can't sell records - look what dying did for Jimi and Janis's careers. Hell, even Keith Richards is selling records when he's half-dead.

      It's just strange to me that of all the talent out there, Apple would choose a second or third-tier group like U2 to do this with.

      Besides, there's no stage big enough to hold both the egos of Jobs and Bono at the same time. By the way, why post anonymously? I really don't get that whole thing; why not stand up for your words?

  23. International availability? by plj · · Score: 1

    Too bad this will probably be an U.S. only -deal. I couldn't care less about U2, but I've considered to finally buy an iPod next month, and my metal-weighted music library would deserve black covers around it. ;)

    --
    “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  24. How Much of the Catalog? by Mad+Martigan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    black iPod that comes preloaded with the band's new album as well as portions of the band's 25-year back catalo

    Sure, it's cool that the iPod is black (although, I can't seem to find any pictures of said iPod. I'd love to see what it looks like), but I think the real question is how much of the band's catalog is preloaded onto it? If you are a U2 fan, and the device contains, say, even 50% of the catalog, that's pretty significant value added. Of course, if you're a U2 fan, you probably own those albums anyway, so maybe not.

    Still, I guess it's a nice marketing gimmick by Apple. Exclusive rights to seel the music (online, and for a little while at least), some ads out of a pretty popular group, and a million trillion news outlets covering the story and producing even more press. Kudos, Apple.

    1. Re:How Much of the Catalog? by Daagar · · Score: 1

      It looks just like the white iPod, only darker.

  25. Hidden Message in name by FerretFrottage · · Score: 3, Funny

    in reverse....dopi2U

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  26. Hopefully they turn off the Auto-Sync function... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...or there will be some unhappy folks who synchronize their library (and blow away the new album).

  27. U2 live by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    I saw them circa 1980. I brought a girl, hoping to impress her. U2 brought their full stadium sound gear. Trouble was, it was a 4,500 seat auditorium.

    I've noticed that as a trend over the years: bands don't tune their sound to the venue very well. The sound guys usually wear headphones, to zero in on this track or that, and don't bother with just how loud the overall band is after the initial sound check.

    The overvolume of the show pretty much ruined me on U2 after that. All I could think of when I heard their songs for years was that, uh, rather disappointing evening.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:U2 live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I saw them circa 1980. I brought a girl, hoping to impress her.

      Who are you trying to kid?

    2. Re:U2 live by Kinryuu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw them circa 1980 . . . . U2 brought their full stadium sound gear.

      U2 only played in one stadium before 1983. And they certainly weren't using their own gear at that concert. It was National Stadium in Dublin. Their last show before they were signed by Island Records. They didn't play in any other stadium until the North America leg of the War tour. And I doubt any of their venues during that tour sat 4500. Next time you go to a rock and roll show, maybe you should expect the music to be a little loud, but don't blame U2.

    3. Re:U2 live by topham · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is, the girl said No.

      Seriously, I know what you mean. I went to a Bif Naked concert with my girlfriend. The venue was quite small, and the sound level was easily for a place which could hold 10-20 times as many people.

    4. Re:U2 live by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Ok, googling ...

      It was a concert on 02/23/82 at the University Of Illinois Auditorium - Champaign, IL. It only seated 1,936 people at the time. It was packed, as I recall. The balcony above our heads was unstable, and the whole place smelled of bong water.

      I've been to lots of concerts, and I know they're loud. I liked my music loud even more then than I do now. Could you have missed the point more?

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    5. Re:U2 live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're lucky you left with the girl. Bif Naked can be quite flirty.

  28. Bono's a moron by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ya'll see that commercial with him pimping the iPod? He counts "Uno... Dos... Tres... Catorce" in Spanish. Now I may not be the most educated man on Earth, but I know sure as shit that fourteen does NOT come after three!!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Bono's a moron by glenrm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe he is trying to be cool, I don't know I was never good at cool...

    2. Re:Bono's a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it does.

    3. Re:Bono's a moron by fr2asbury · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well it sure as heck doesn't come BEFORE three. ;-)

    4. Re:Bono's a moron by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Uh...didja ever think maybe, just maybe, he was taking what's called "artistic licence?"

      Yeah.

      As Slashdot says, "It's funny. Laugh."

      p

    5. Re:Bono's a moron by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny

      He works for the music industry. Therefore, his count is accurate if he was counting 6gb iPods for the first three, and a 60gb iPod for the fourth.

    6. Re:Bono's a moron by Edgetho007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually I think the new album is their fourteenth.

    7. Re:Bono's a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...I know sure as shit that fourteen does NOT come after three!!

      Are you sure about that? Let's see....

      1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,...

      Fourteen does come after three. Oh, wait. You must mean immediately after three.

    8. Re:Bono's a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how it works. You know how a 10 "GB" hard disk doesn't actually have 10 GB? It has 9 GB or so.

      Well, take a U2 album like their Best of 1980-1990. It claims to have 14 of their "best" tracks. But of course, that's just advertising. As Bono notes, there are really only 3 that are any good.

    9. Re:Bono's a moron by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      that doesn't mean the commercial sucks less. The song, if it is actually a song and not just a commercial jingle, should go down in history with other crappy songs with numerical debaucheries in spanish by a non-spanish speaking group, such as "Pretty Fly" by the Offspring.

      "Uno dos tres quatro cinco cinco seis?" Come on...

      In fact, i'm surprised it's not an MTV Music Award yet. "Best numerical debauchery in spanish by a non-spanish speaking group." Or should that be "Worst..."?

    10. Re:Bono's a moron by Zoc_All_Alone · · Score: 1

      No, fourteen does come after three, there's just a few numbers between it.

    11. Re:Bono's a moron by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 1

      No Bono is a tool.

    12. Re:Bono's a moron by karnal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the last time, if you don't like something, that doesn't automatically mean you can sway others to instantly not like it because of your logic.

      Just say "It sucks" and move on. Better yet, don't post anything at all -- because most don't care.

      But of course, then I wouldn't get to vent to people like yourself.

      --
      Karnal
    13. Re:Bono's a moron by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh...didja ever think maybe, just maybe, he was taking what's called "artistic licence?"

      "It should be revoked!"

    14. Re:Bono's a moron by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Offspring were trying to rhyme tres with seis. I'm pretty sure they know how to count. Both U2 and the Offspring were mocking those songs that count to 4 at the beginning.

    15. Re:Bono's a moron by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      So I'm not an idiot after all?! But wait, it's 23:50, and I'm posting bullshait...

    16. Re:Bono's a moron by villy · · Score: 1

      From SNL - Jeopardy parody...

      Alex Trebek (Will Ferrell)- Ok, that's it, you idiots - here's the Final Jeopardy Question: "Pick a number... any number!?!"

      French Stewart (JImmy Fallon)- "Threeve!"

    17. Re:Bono's a moron by Peig · · Score: 1

      Yeah but as a fellow irish person. Who is not a fan by the way..
      We do not have the same education in spanish as people from the US. We usually spend more time learning the more common (as per population) european languages. French German etc.

      To tell the truth I didn't even notice. Probably because I come from the same pre-uni edu system as Bono.

      --
      Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men. - Martin Luther King Jr.
    18. Re:Bono's a moron by SJ · · Score: 1

      Ummm... My sarcasm detector must not be working, but isn't Bonno speaking Italian?

      In which case...

      Un - One
      Due - Two
      Tre - Three
      Quattro - Four

      ??

    19. Re:Bono's a moron by jyoull · · Score: 1

      That's funny, except...

      This has something to do with Steve Lillywhite producing U2 albums 1,2,3... and this one. I cannot count them up to make the current album #14, but the current release is too close to #14 to make this impossible... and dunno what else it could mean. it's probably a bit more than simple moronicity, however.

    20. Re:Bono's a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ears aren't working either. Quattro != Catorce.

    21. Re:Bono's a moron by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      is that what it was? i guess I misinterpreted their mocking for lack of inspiration and talent. U2 once had some good songs. "Still haven't found what i'm looking for" is one of the first songs I ever rememeber hearing.

      i suppose I'm not their target audience anymore.

    22. Re:Bono's a moron by Spark00 · · Score: 1

      Actually it DOES come after three. Not immediately after 3, I'll give you that.

  29. Re:Finally! by garcia · · Score: 1

    You know, I'm not a fan of the continual ads about the iPod on Slashdot but that's another story.

    On another tangent, will the next U2 album be so terrible that they need to latch on to the iPod in order to get an image boost as "still relevant"?

    Actually the new album, from what I have heard of it, doesn't really sound like your typical U2 pop rock stuff. Some of it is actually decent and some of it is absolute shit. But I suppose that I'm more tuned in to their older shit and don't really care for the turn they have taken with this album (again, what I have heard from it at least).

  30. U2 References by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Funny

    My Karma's bound to take a beating for this but oh well...

    This portable mp3 player seems nice and I've been shopping around for a while but I still haven't found what I'm looking for.

    Does it have additional GPS functionality in case I get lost where the streets have no name?

    They initially went with Rio but with the faulty hard-drives, the "Rio Lemon" just wasn't going to be popular.

    They were also pitched a deal with Microsoft but Bono didn't like the idea of Ballmer dancing to Mysterious Ways...and Hold Me Thrill Me Kiss Me Kill Me for that matter.

    I heard the new black ipod is nature-proof and can be used even in places of high elevation.

    Asked if the band actually uses the product, Bono admitted that both he and The Edge owned One...but they're not the same.

    1. Re:U2 References by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that it was a Beautiful Day when you first got it. You were thinking about a Mini, but decided to just Walk On past it. Come to think of it, you would have had it sooner, but UPS won't deliver on Sunday, Bloody Sunday. Still, you take great Pride in owning it.

      Sorry, but I had to follow.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:U2 References by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Mine is scheduled to arrive on New Years Day...

      And then, oh iPod of mine, I'll be with you be with you night and day!

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    3. Re:U2 References by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about an REM Red? Market it to shiny happy people. It also works as a great gift for the gloomy types who think it's the end of the world as we know it -- after all, it's understandable that everybody hurts. If you get it online for someone else, it can go out to the one you love in a day or two.

      Maybe they can put an FM radio with it with some preset stations from your locale. That way you won't have to ask anyone what the frequency is.

      To be blatant marketeers, though -- they'd have to sell their soul or lose their religion or something.

    4. Re:U2 References by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d slashbot rime has its own wikipedia article!!!!!!!!!

  31. An all-U2 iPod? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 2, Funny

    BOY! I sure want ONE of those! I wonder if the headphone WIRE is colored - if not, I'll have to PAINT IT BLACK. If I had a black iPod I'd sure take PRIDE in it. I wonder if it comes in 40 gig? Y'know, I got a white iPod once and it was a LEMON. Now that I think about it, I guess an iPod isn't really what I want. Great... I STILL HAVEN'T FOUND WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR.

    (Go ahead. Mod me down. I'll still laugh at it... WITH OR WITHOUT YOU!)

    1. Re:An all-U2 iPod? by jnik · · Score: 1

      That would have worked, except Paint it Black is Stones.

    2. Re:An all-U2 iPod? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1
  32. advertisement of death by petwalrus · · Score: 1
    Nothing quite as nice as when you start reading the page THIS GIANT WHITE BOX COVERS YOUR ENTIRE SCREEN... making you think to yourself, "WTF?!"... only then a second later you can see some lame advertisement for something getting loaded.

    Can't wait to see what they think of next!
    ...At least there wasn't sound. :)

  33. Lacking features by Thunderstruck · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a neat gadget, but it lacks a few things like touchscreen & a built in cell-phone... maybe 802.11 so I can swap tunes from my HDD more easily... in short:

    I STILL HAVEN'T FOUND WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR.

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
  34. I'm holding out by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    for a Type R iPod in green/purple chameleon paint, and a "spinner rim" scroll wheel.

    1. Re:I'm holding out by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hear the sticker gives you a few extra gigs of storage space!

    2. Re:I'm holding out by Royoken · · Score: 2, Funny

      new MTV show, "Pimp my iPod"

    3. Re:I'm holding out by Refrag · · Score: 1
      --
      I have a website. It's about Macs.
  35. None more black...sabbath. by mcmonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Completely OT, but I was just thinking, how great is 'Iron Man'

    He was turned to steel
    In the great magnetic field
    Where he traveled time
    For the future of mankind

    1. Re:None more black...sabbath. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere as cool as Hand of Doom.

      Now you know the scene.
      Your skin starts turning green.
      Price of life too high.
      Now you're gonna die.


      Paranoid is one of the greatest albums of all time.

  36. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It must be hard for Bono to decide whether he is a corporate rock stooge or an Apple-using rebel. Thank god U2's music hasn't been compromised.

  37. Remember the HP Blue iPod? by CdBee · · Score: 1

    This isn't the first time someone's announced an iPod in non-standard colours.. nothing came of it last time around!

    I don't believe Apple want to issue iPods which aren't in the standard colours as it breaks the consistency of their product line. Black iPods? I'll believe it when I see it.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Remember the HP Blue iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that they have an entire line of iPods in color, right?

    2. Re:Remember the HP Blue iPod? by CdBee · · Score: 1

      I was wrong - they've announced it officially. Black iPods.

      Apologies.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  38. backup the songs? by MCS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lets say I bought this new ipod, and I had to format it for some reason.

    Now will I be able to get the preshipped songs back on it? Will I be able to transfer them off the Ipod (or install CD) to make a copy for my (fair) use?

    1. Re:backup the songs? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      There are any number of 3rd party utilities for OSX/Windows that allow you to transfer the songs off the IPod. Also Itunes allows you burn cd's of your songs.

    2. Re:backup the songs? by MCS · · Score: 1

      really? I didn't know you could burn cd's with songs directly from you Ipod. I thought you'd have to transfer it to the machine first. I'll have to play with this when I get home.

    3. Re:backup the songs? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      Just make a playlist under itunes and burn the playlist. It's not rocket science.

    4. Re:backup the songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets say I bought this new ipod, and I had to format it for some reason. Now will I be able to get the preshipped songs back on it?

      That's a strange way to phrase the question.

      The answer, of course, is that you'll have more space on your iPod, and you won't have U2 cluttering up your playlists.

    5. Re:backup the songs? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I thought you were the 'Nice Geek'?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:backup the songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      More importantly, will the current version of iTunes even ALLOW you to keep U2's CD on your iPod?

      In the past, you were not supposed to be able to transfer songs from iPod -> computer, only computer -> iPod. This was done to discourage people from sharing iPods and thus illegally copying songs between computers. 3rd party hacks will bypass this situation, but it's not apple-approved.

      So right now, as soon as you plug this iPod into your computer, iTunes will see that the songs on your computer != songs on your iPod, and iTunes will overwrite your iPod with your computer music. Poof! There goes your U2 music. Probably before you even know what's happened.

      The only way around this is if apple includes a version of iTunes with the U2 iPod that somehow avoids this situation.

    7. Re:backup the songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, for the price of an iPod, you may as well get the CD with it.

    8. Re:backup the songs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is...

    9. Re:backup the songs? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      Mebbe should change handle to "Occasionally cranky geek" eh?

    10. Re:backup the songs? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The point he was trying to make was that you'd be burning the playlist from iTunes, not from the iPod. If you aren't allowed to transfer from the iPod to the computer, how does it get into iTunes?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:backup the songs? by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      I don't know if anyone will bother checking this thread again but I might as well try to make this clear. When you hook up the IPod it shows up in Itunes. When it does, you can create playlists (and burn them) and copy music to/delete music from.

  39. RDF? by jxyama · · Score: 1

    perhaps steve's RDF is wearing on Bono/U2?

  40. Not like any other Mp3 player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With my other mp3 players, I slide open the hatch and replace the battery. No screwdriver involved, no risk of destroying the machine either.

    Remember that Popular Science article by the guy showing how easy it was to replace the battery in the iPod. He even described all the tools and techniques. You almost miss it at the end when he mentions that it never came on agian. The operation was a success but the patient died.

  41. Why only portions of their back catalog? by British · · Score: 1

    If a band is gonna tie itself to a marketing campaign, you might as well give them the whole kit & kaboodle.

    That would entail:

    all albums. Yeah, all of them.
    B-sides. Ie stuff not on the albums/cds/compilations
    outtakes/demos - Get the really-hard-to-find U2 audio. You know, those tracks you have to buy the whole box set to get, and it's usually just 1 or 2 tunes + all the tunes you had before?

    If you're gonna go, go all out. Put some tracks that might not sell well by itself, but would be a great addition to an iPod for fans, or would-be fans.

  42. So they aren't full sellouts by MCS · · Score: 1

    I saw the new IPod commercial on the weekend with a shiluotted(SP) playing 'Vertigo' in it. I guess I'm going to have to take back my comment about witnessing a new low -- song rights sold before the album was commercially availble.

    1. Re:So they aren't full sellouts by djaj · · Score: 1

      Actually, the song was (and still is) commercially available on a 7" single before the ad came out. And it was available on iTunes, naturally.

      --

      Your mileage may vary, but mine is constant.

  43. In Soviet Russia... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    Its sales were flying high until spyware was found on board-- then the Government shot it down.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Buran · · Score: 1

      But was it over international waters or not? Only your MiG pilot knows for sure ...

  44. Uhm, doh by Lord+Graga · · Score: 1

    Seems like that /. has an iPod freak or two among them. It's just advertisements foos!

  45. Is There A More Ridiculous Sight by GiveWarAChance · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Than Bono walking around the poorest parts of Africa in his $800 Gucci shades?

    1. Re:Is There A More Ridiculous Sight by eldimo · · Score: 1

      ...and seeing something like this during a meeting in the compagny of various important people:

      Black man looking at Bono: And you are you?
      Bono: I'm Bono ...
      (silence) ...
      Bono: I'm a famous rock star
      Black man: Ah... right...

    2. Re:Is There A More Ridiculous Sight by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there is. A less ridiculous sight, however, would be Bono lobbying various world leaders to reduce or drop 3rd world debt, shaming people into contributing to various charities and being exceedingly generous with his own time and money for those same charities. Bono might sometimes be a pompous git, but he does put his time and money where his mouth is.

  46. Not really "custom" by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe this is just nitpicking, but the word "custom" usually means "built to custom specifications for a particular customer." Customer. This is really just a special promotional edition iPod that is being mass-produced. Kind of misleading to call it "custom."

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Not really "custom" by healy · · Score: 1

      Nitpicking your Nitpick:

      Perhaps in this case, the Customer is U2 and the custom job refers to their wishes? OK, the marketing department, but you get my point

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
  47. Re:Hopefully they turn off the Auto-Sync function. by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the exact same thing. I'm thinking that Apple will either:

    1) Include a gift certificate inside each U2 iPod box to download the songs,

    2) Put the songs on the iPod so that they can only be accessed when as a harddrive to give you a chance to copy them to your computers HDD,

    3) Put the songs on a CD/DVD and put that in the box (I think this would be the least likely since it would then cause further problems with Apple Corps.)

    4) Include a mail-in coupon to get the songs on CD/DVD.

  48. iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple will soon be coming out with a 60gb iPod. Next logical step, right? Consider this: - 60GB is approximately 12,000 songs, if songs average 5MB each. - Assuming each song is purchased either from a CD or from the iTunes store, the average cost/track is around $1 Conclusions: A). Apple must believe that there is a sizable market of people who are likey to spend $12,000 on music that want a single device to hold it all or B). Apple realized that a hefty amount of their iPod market steals music and doesn't care, so long as they get profit from the stolen-music business in addition to the profits made from the music that still gets purchased from the iTunes store.

    1. Re:iPod and music piracy... by zaren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about...

      C) Apple realizes that a lot of people have large / enormous / OMGthatsalot cd collections that they'd like to carry around with them.

      Between my wife and I, we've purchased enough cds over the years to use up about 8 gig of space on an iPod (based on my standard compression choice). Our collection is really small compared to a lot of people I know (i.e. we've got maybe 100 cds between us).

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    2. Re:iPod and music piracy... by brainnolo · · Score: 2

      What about the market of people who rips his own regularly bought CDs and plays them on the iPod? Don't always try to blame a company. Also the iPod can be used to carry around any file!

    3. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you're not factoring in CD's that people already own and rip to mp3 format and then put on their ipod.

      or using the ipod for something other than music.

      anyway what's your point? its a storage device. its none of apple's busines what people do with them. It's up tothe individual owners to not break the law.

    4. Re:iPod and music piracy... by ByteMangler_242 · · Score: 1

      The iPod doubles as a firewire/USB 2 hard drive, making it the thumbdrive equivilent for graphics types who need to tote large files around all the time. Plus it can hold a lot of pirated music too :-)

      --

      Rule of the open mind
      People who are resistant to change cannot resist change for the worst.

    5. Re:iPod and music piracy... by why-is-it · · Score: 1
      A). Apple must believe that there is a sizable market of people who are likey to spend $12,000 on music that want a single device to hold it all or B). Apple realized that a hefty amount of their iPod market steals music and doesn't care, so long as they get profit from the stolen-music business in addition to the profits made from the music that still gets purchased from the iTunes store.

      How about C) Apple knows that the people who are likely to purchase an iPOD almost certainly own a few music CDs, perhaps dozens of them. Maybe Apple figures that those people might like to make take their music collection with them on the go?

      Sure, the RIAA would argue that is "theft", but they never really liked fair use provisions anyways.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    6. Re:iPod and music piracy... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Or, they could be kike me, with a CD catalogue going back 16 years. I have hudreds of CDs. And every one of them is sitting on my iPod. Don't be so quick to call users thieves. Jackass.

      And what the hell does Apple care how people get their music? That's not their responcibility.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    7. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Which, if you read it, was option A. I did list that they could be purchased from CD (still costs around $1/track at todays prices). 8 gigs is tiny compared to 60 - the fact that you use only 8 gigs doesn't prove that apple has a market for a 60 gig ipod. As a matter of fact, you're actually one reason to NOT create a larger size. Even purchasing CDs is still that much money. Technically, if you and your wife both had an iPod containing your combined collection, it'd still be music piracy, since it's two copies that could potentially be listened to at the same time.

    8. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      The ability to carry any file I didn't take into account - for that purpose, 60 gigs makes sense. But yeah, I did take into account purchasing CDs and ripping them, read the post again (buying a cd for $15 with 15 tracks is still $1/track, btw) I don't *blame* Apple. I'm just pointing out that they must at least recognize that a good portion of their market are music pirates.

    9. Re:iPod and music piracy... by rco3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...or C) Apple has realized that there is a large segment of the population that wants to carry around mp3s, etc., of music that they've ALREADY BOUGHT and have THEMSELVES RIPPED so that they can listen to all of their OWN music wherever they go.

      That's still legal here in the US.

      When *I* rip songs, they average about 8 MB each. That's about 7500 songs, or (calculated by compression ratio) about 7.5 full discs per gig. Call it 10 discs to account for stuff that's not 72 minutes. Hmm, 600 CDs. I don't have that many, no - but I've got more than 200. And having more than 400 is not that hard to imagine.

      Maybe Apple aren't out to contribute to music piracy. Maybe they really want to help people to listen to THEIR music the way THEY want to. ...or maybe D) each song averages 110k each, and Apple thinks that people want to carry around enough music to occupy the rest of their lives, and in fact are planning a subcutaneous model for 2006?

      Myself, I'm betting on A) or C). Don't forget that the iPod can be used as storage, too...

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    10. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      a dozen CDs is MAYBE 500 songs. You'd need six HUNDRED cds, each with 20 tracks to get 60 gigs of music. I didn't mean to imply that people would be purchasing CDs all at once, lump sum of $12,000 - I just meant that they must have spent a total of that amount over time. I should have been more clear.

    11. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      I don't know about everyone else here, but I use part of my iPod storage space to move data files between computers. On my 15GB model, there's usually about 5GB of data files along with another 5GB or so of music content. Mostly MP3s I ripped from my CD collection. I'd probably tote more data around if I had a bigger iPod. I really like the removable HD part of it.

    12. Re:iPod and music piracy... by vicparedes · · Score: 1

      You hastily assume that iPod customers are also first time CD buyers. It could very well be that someone already owns $12,000 worth of CDs. Judging by the amount of CDs I've purchased in the past 15 years, I'd say I just might have about 12K worth.

    13. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      STOP THINKING MP3s ARE THE ONLY FORMAT!

      I load Apple Lossless files into my iPod, big deal. 60GB will be gone in a wink

    14. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Ok, so that makes one person with enough music for a 60 gig iPod. I'm sure there is a number of those people. What I'm questioning is if there are really enough people with that many legitimately owned songs to warrant the design and marketing for the iPod at 60 gigs. And you're right, it's not Apple's ResponSibility to make sure that people are legally obtaining their music. But if the majority of their business is for stolen music, what makes them different from the convenience store that sells cigarettes to minors or manufactures crack pipes? (or even selling guns to terrorists?)

    15. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      No, I never said they have to IMMEDIATELY go out and buy 12 grand in CDs....I was just saying "how many people REALLY own that many / plan to buy that many"

    16. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Way to say the same thing everyone else did...

      1). Yes, I did consider that people have CDs. That's why I said "CDs" in the original post. CDs still cost the same per track approximately. If you don't like my estimate, make a new one. That's still 600 someodd CDs. Do YOU have 600 cds?

      2). True, you can use the iPod for something other than music. That's a bit of a niche market at the moment, kind of a "well, I have an iPod anyway, I may as well use it for X" because if they wanted a real portable drive, they'd get one that didn't need special drivers just to copy files OFF it.

      3). Is it none of their business? Is Apple selling devices marketed toward stolen music any different than cigarette companies using cartoons and the "cool" image to sell? At least cigarettes have a sizeable legal market... I'm still unconvinced that there are enough people with that large a *legal* collection to justify needing 60 gigs of storage for it.

    17. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Graff · · Score: 2, Informative
      True, you can use the iPod for something other than music. That's a bit of a niche market at the moment, kind of a "well, I have an iPod anyway, I may as well use it for X" because if they wanted a real portable drive, they'd get one that didn't need special drivers just to copy files OFF it.

      The iPod is a regular, standard, mass-storage device. No drivers are needed, it's just plug it in and start using it as a hard drive. I use mine for just this task all the time and I've never needed any sort of special drivers.

      Actually, for the price, it is pretty competitive with equivalently-priced, comparably-sized portable hard drives on the market. Add that on to it's capabilities as a music device and other bells and whistles and you have a nice package.
    18. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Or C) records (used ones are dirt cheap), legal bootlegs (Grateful Dead, many others), used CDs, and stuff people have made available for free. Not to mention emusic and allofmp3.com, or classical CDs, some of which are available fairly cheaply.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    19. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought they had to have some kind of anyi-piracy thing so you couldn't give your mp3s away to people when you plugged into their PC. I guess I spoke without knowing on that part...

    20. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Graff · · Score: 1
      I thought they had to have some kind of anyi-piracy thing so you couldn't give your mp3s away to people when you plugged into their PC. I guess I spoke without knowing on that part...

      The software which manages the music is iTunes. iTunes will only let you synch your iPod with one machine, if you change the iPod to synch with a different machine then iTunes will tell you it will replace the songs on your iPod with the songs on the new machine. So you can't use iTunes to transfer songs from one machine, to an iPod, to another machine.

      This doesn't stop you from doing the copying through some other application, such as the application that normally handles files on your machine. The only roadblock to that is that when iTunes places music on your iPod it puts all of its songs and database information in a hidden directory. It's just the normal hidden bit though, so it's easy to get around. Most file copy programs will allow you to see hidden files easily.

      Like most concessions that Apple has made to the music industry in order to do business with them, these issues are nothing more than speed bumps. By not allowing the iTunes application to easily be used as a music copying device Apple protects itself from lawsuits. Meanwhile, Apple knows that a ton of 3rd party tools will be created to get around these speed bumps. Remember, Steve Jobs was the one who said, "Every security scheme that is based on secrets eventually fails"
    21. Re:iPod and music piracy... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      It depends on bitrate and compression. I've got a friend that has all .wav (actually aiff) files on his iPod. I do know people with hundreds of CDs, but I don't know if they have as many as 600. However, you only need a collection of 401 CDs to find a 60 GB iPod useful (using your numbers).

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  49. Unfair Trade practice? by jhoegl · · Score: 0

    Isnt exclusive selling or limiting the selling of a product to one company/outlet known as unfair trade practices?

    1. Re:Unfair Trade practice? by why-is-it · · Score: 1
      Isnt exclusive selling or limiting the selling of a product to one company/outlet known as unfair trade practices?

      Someone call the FTC!! Why can't I purchase a new Ford from a GM or Chrysler dealership?

      Please turn your thinking cap to the "ON" position...

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    2. Re:Unfair Trade practice? by jhoegl · · Score: 0

      Um... you didnt read my whole statment, so... why dont you go back and reread it... Ill wait for the apology.

  50. Earbuds by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if the earbuds (and cord) are black too. White cord/earbuds used to be a sign of 'rob me, I got an expansive Ipod in my pocket'. Many friends of mine changed the (excellent) earbuds that came with their Ipod for Sony's one for this particular reason.

    As a side note, I just don't get the U2 sponsorship thing... what's next, pink Ipod with Britney preloaded?

    1. Re:Earbuds by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      I'm waiting for the Hello Kitty edition.

      Not sure what music they'd preload on that, mind...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  51. This is the Million Dollar Question by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think this is more important than the colour and what songs are pre-loaded and is really the topic that should be discussed here.

    I don't have an iPod, but my iRiver will not let me download MP3s (I can delete 'em tho), but this is not an issue because it assumes that if I uploaded the files, I have them somewhere else. How does the standard iPod handle this issue?

    Along with this, what will the quality of the MP3s be? Will they be sampled at the highest possible bit rate (ideally have a CD image on the iPod's hard drive) or at the minimum to save space and minimize the likely hood of pirating the recordings?

    Maybe a better question is, who is driving this promotion? If it's the band, will they be pushing for the consumer to get the best deal or if it's an RIAA weasel, will they try to give the absolute minimum (and even try to get the consumer to shell out for the CD as well)?

    myke

    1. Re:This is the Million Dollar Question by MCS · · Score: 1

      On my Ipod (generation 2) I can't delete MP3's or move them off it. I need to be synced to Itunes to manage the mp3's on the pod.

      I guess I can copy them off the ipod if I use it as a portable HD... but then I wouldn't be able to listen to them when I'm trying to dance against bright colored walls while being backlit.

    2. Re:This is the Million Dollar Question by ajna · · Score: 1

      The music resides in /Volumes/[your iPod's name]/iPod Control/Music -- might be slightly wrong here, going from memory and my iPod is beyond arm's reach/not plugged in. So to move music from the iPod to the computer, simply copy all of the FXX within Music folders to your hard drive (ex: "cp -r /Volumes/[your iPod's name]/iPod Control/Music ~/Music/"). Give the tiny 1.8" hard drive a few minutes to grind away, and your songs should be backed up.

  52. Obvious by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm still waiting for the black and yellow sriped STRYPER edition. Hello?

    1. Re:Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha that made me spit out my coffee :) hillarious

      - crypticreign on freenode

  53. Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Nutcase · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Um.. every time you plug an ipod into a machine it hasnt connected with, it asks if you want to associate it with that machine. It does this by asking if you want to erase the contents of the iPod and copy songs down from the machine. If you say yes, your iPod's contents are erased, and updated with whatever is in iTunes. If you say no, you keep whats on the iPod, but can't add anything new. Not to mention you can't copy music back from the iPod to the machine.

    (Note: all of the above assumes you are using iTunes and not one of the many third party tools available, as this is an official apple thing, and they assume the same)

    So how exactly will preloading music work? The first time you plug it into your machine you get to pick between your new U2 songs or the rest of your music? Maybe there will be a new iTunes in which marketing has dictated that U2 preload songs be hardcoded to avoid being erased? I mean, the iPod ALSO limits people from copying songs back to their machine.. so it's not like you can back the tunes up before associating the thing.

    Maybe all of this is outlined in TFA and I should have read it. Or maybe apple has decided to remove the stupid association/copying limitations on the iPod now that they have their whole DRM stuff going on. But that seems doubtful.

    1. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Farrside · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can just use a file utility to view Invisible files... the iPod shows up as a hard drive to the rest of the (not iTunes) system, and the music is in an invisible folder. Copy it over to your hard drive and do whatcha like.

    2. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's nothing to stop you adding music to an iPod if you choose not to synchronise it with your iTunes music library. You just need to drag the tracks you want to the iPod icon.

      I can see what you mean if someone plugs it in and asks it to synchronise without realising it will erase the current tracks.

      Stuart

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    3. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Stuart,

      Good point. But think like the kind of person who would buy a special iPod because there is a U2 album on it, even though the CD is right there.

      If apple doesn't change the behavior of the iTunes/iPod setup in some way, things are gonna get messy..

      That said... hmm.. a black ipod could be neat.

    4. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know, iTunes doesn't erase the contents of the hard drive, only the special hidden music folders.

      So if the albums were stored on a disk image, say a CD, or multiple CDs, or something, on the drive, they wouldn't get erased unless the user erased them.

      And then when they get mounted by the OS, iTunes should be able to recognize them as CDs. Which means that iTunes can also import them. Even if they are mounted as disk images, iTunes can still import them into the library.

      So technically there's nothing stopping:
      Disk image containing all the songs on the drive (but not in the music folder)
      Said disk image automounted when the iPod is plugged in
      Said songs on said disk image imported by iTunes automatically (or prompted to at least)
      Said library created by iTunes is automatically (unless told otherwise) synched to the iPod

    5. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      If you say no, you keep whats on the iPod, but can't add anything new.

      False. You select the option to update the iPod manually, and copy as much shit as you want to the iPod.

      Not to mention you can't copy music back from the iPod to the machine.

      True. In order to do this, I believe you must open it up in a file manager, copy all of the music onto your hard drive, then go into iTunes and import that folder. Assuming the music files contained ID3 or are AAC files, they should have all their info show up in iTunes even though it may have renamed the files when it put them on the ipod...

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    6. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the only way to get U2 to an official inclusion of their songs would be with some kind of DRM, which would rule out an easily importable disk image.

      Then again, maybe U2 suddenly got enlightened and went all cool on us, tech wise. Hmmm.

    7. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't the disk image be full of Fairplay encoded songs that iTunes would import JUST like a song it downloads off the internet from the iTMS?

      Except instead of downloading off the internet, it would download off the CD, and upload the proper codes to the iTMS?

    8. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Oh My God! In just a few short moments, you completely outsmarted and debunked an ad campaign by Apple that hasn't even started yet.

      Granted, they make the world's most popular MP3 player. Granted, they make the world's most used online music store. Granted, they ARE the digital hub company. But gosh, you sure showed them. I bet the entire iPod dev team just got fired for somebody not noticing that one.

      Good thing you outsmarted Apple so early, they could have made a HUGE mistake there.

    9. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, the problem I see with that is that you end up with two copies of each song. I wonder if a [symbolic|hard] link could fix that?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    10. Re:Preload gets erased on first use? Huh? by Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Sorry.. I forgot to include the obligatory apple blowjob required to avoid the knee jerk defend-at-all-costs responses from the apple zealots.

      I own an iPod. in fact, it's my fifth, as I keep upgrading to the new models, both space and interface wise. I also own a mac. That doesn't mean that I think apple can do no wrong. I think that the artificial copying restrictions on the iPod are stupid.

      My main point is that this "bundled songs" thing wont work unless they change something, and I'm curious as to what they will change to make it work. Hopefully it will lead to a better overall user experience.

      Oh, and kiss my ass you self-righteous dick.

  54. Re:Finally! by athakur999 · · Score: 1

    HP already sells "iPod tattoos" for their HP branded iPods (though I don't know why they wouldn't work on the Apple one). They're basically stickers you print out and then apply to your iPod.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  55. Yes... by mykepredko · · Score: 0, Redundant

    and it comes with a volume control that goes up to 11!

    myke

  56. I want mine with the fat muffler! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Well mine will have a muffler instead of a firewire jack. When it transfers, you'll hear the following.

  57. Still... by rxmd · · Score: 0, Troll
    No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.

    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    1. Re:Still... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      First funny comment to make me actually laugh using my mouth today, the others i thought funny.

  58. Very slick marketing... by Proteus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Once again, Apple demonstrates that they've mastered the art of slick marketing. This new iPod should definately appeal to a few categories of people who don't already own an iPod:
    • Those who don't like the whiteness
    • Those who are fad-driven, since this will be the "latest cool thing"
    • Those pondering an iPod purchase, but who were undecided might see extra value in the preloaded songs, and be pushed to buy
    • U2 fan{boy|girl}s: they will buy because the black iPod screams "I'm a U2 fan".
    I expect that this promotion will be rather effective, and we'll see Apple running similar promos in the future. Also, the poster who predicted changeable iPod covers (a la cellphone faceplates) is, IMO, right on the money.
    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    1. Re:Very slick marketing... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I was so going to buy one becasue I like U2...but since you put it that way, I'll pass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Very slick marketing... by hansoncoyne · · Score: 1

      hmm i dunno. I'm pretty sure you can get a claudia schiffer palm Vx pretty cheap right about now. for every signature model sold of this that or the other thing there are 20 in a warehouse rotting away.

    3. Re:Very slick marketing... by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those who don't like the whiteness

      I doubt that. Most of the U2 fans I know are incredibly white. Hell, you practically need special glasses to see them.

      --saint

    4. Re:Very slick marketing... by SilentChris · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry, but you're out of your mind.

      "Those who don't like the whiteness"

      That's precisely the reason why the original was so successful: it stood out in crowds. You go on a subway, you know who has iPods. Every consumer device in the world is black (or silver).

      "Those who are fad-driven, since this will be the 'latest cool thing'"

      U2 are hardly in their "fad" stage. In fact, I'm surprised Apple thought U2 was a good idea at all. They haven't had good music in over a decade. It's like that Garfield movie that came out 20 years after it should've.

      "Those pondering an iPod purchase, but who were undecided might see extra value in the preloaded songs, and be pushed to buy"

      People are stupid, but not that stupid. A lot of people I know who bought iPods (including my brother) already had vast MP3 collections. The music is not "added value". They can get it free of Soulseek.

      "U2 fan{boy|girl}s: they will buy because the black iPod screams "I'm a U2 fan"."

      To be honest, not sure anyone would want to scream that nowadays. ;) Their early stuff was excellent. They went downhill after Joshua Tree.

    5. Re:Very slick marketing... by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Those who don't like the whiteness

      You mean like Eminem? They asked him, but he doesn't like MP3s... (see here)

    6. Re:Very slick marketing... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're trying to break into an older demographic, that grew up listening to U2 when they were good?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Very slick marketing... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Let me get this straight. You're not going to buy one because you're afraid to be identified as a U2 fan? or because you're afraid Proteus will make fun of you?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Very slick marketing... by Proteus · · Score: 1
      U2 are hardly in their "fad" stage
      I wasn't talking about U2, but the black iPod being the latest "fad".
      A lot of people I know who bought iPods (including my brother) already had vast MP3 collections. The music is not "added value". They can get it free of Soulseek.
      Apple doesn't care about people who've already bought an iPod. And not everyone wants to get "free" music -- many people are scared to use trading services, and some people would rather have licensed media than free, unlicensed. To those people, and there are more of them than the /. crowd wants to admin, the music is and added value.
      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  59. Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts.... by acomj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Forbes says "Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts since its debut three weeks ago". The itunes chart..

    Is this the new metric on song popularity? It would seem to very accurate because you can track who would be willing to pay for a song rather than on an album by album basis..

  60. I can still hope by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Where is the Pac Man yellow Ipod. Ipod's are cool. You are a nobody if you don't have an Ipod. Is it really music if you listen to it through anything other than an Ipod. Jesus has an Ipod.

    In truth, I have owned 3 different HD based digital music players....none of them ipods. Does this make me a bad person?

    DRM sucks. I would much rather buy a laptop hard drive that just happens to play mp3's. Rather than a digital music player with DRM that just happens to have a hard drive.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    1. Re:I can still hope by Big+Boss · · Score: 1
      In truth, I have owned 3 different HD based digital music players....none of them ipods. Does this make me a bad person?

      Yes. :-)

      DRM sucks. I would much rather buy a laptop hard drive that just happens to play mp3's. Rather than a digital music player with DRM that just happens to have a hard drive.

      In principle, I agree. In practice, the iPod is the least annoying DRM out there, and the best MP3 player, hands down. You can just load regular MP3 files into it if you don't want to use ITMS. 99% of the stuff on my iPod is just MP3 tunes. The rest is my growing collection of audiobooks from Audible.com. They require some basic DRM (it's easy to crack if you want MP3, etc. though) and iPod supports it out of the box. I could break the encryption and use a regular MP3 player, but most normal MP3 players aren't real great for audiobooks, and this is easier.

      And you CAN copy the tunes back out of it. Just not with the iTunes program. It's a stupid restriction, but it's easy to bypass. Enable HD mode and copy a small standalone app to it. Then you can copy stuff off the iPod anywhere you have a sync cable and a computer that can run the app.

  61. Actually the point was probably to get you to talk by Polarism · · Score: 1

    about it to friends or, in this case, people on the internet too.

    Sometimes advertisements do weird shit in order to get the word spread.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  62. iTunes backup by vyke4lyfe · · Score: 1

    Instead of having it directly on the ipod, they should just have some special key-code where you download it one time only and have it stored on your computer. That way everyone who wants the album gets it, and those who don't won't have uncessary crap on their ipod.

    1. Re:iTunes backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>That way everyone who wants the album gets it, and those who don't won't have uncessary crap on their ipod.

      My guess is that someone who wouldn't want *u2* songs on a *u2 branded* ipod wouldn't buy the thing to begin with???

  63. Re:Finally! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    You can get cow stickers (random black patches) for your fridge and stuff.

    I want em on my ipod!

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  64. Mods need some emotional distance. by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Quote the parent: gawd, this would rock, that is if U2 didn't suck after they made Johsua Tree.

    And this got modded as flamebait. I thought that truth protected you from being modded flamebait. What the poster said is, IMNSHO, true. Everything after Joshua Tree has been forgettable pop garbage. Souless, meaningless, empty crap.

    You don't have to agree with me, and you don't have to agree with the original poster. That's fine. If you don't you post a rebuttal. You don't mod as flamebait because he/she/it makes a statement you don't agree with.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Mods need some emotional distance. by Golias · · Score: 1

      Saying "music you like sucks" to people is always flamebait.

      U2's new sound lost a lot of old fans of their old "dangadangadanga"-guitar-droning, black-flag-waving, bloody-revolution-shouting, dick-swinging, ultra-simple rock-n-roll sound.

      It also won a lot of new fans.

      When the Joshua Tree came out, a lot of people who dismissed their music as simple political rants over even simpler guitar jams were astonished that U2 could put out anything with the sophistication of "One Tree Hill" or "Mothers of the Disappeared."

      As for the albums that followed, you can't tell me that "When Love Comes To Town", their duet with B. B. King lacked soul.

      Nor can you ever get me to agree with your dismissal of such haunting balads as "Stay (Faraway, So Close)", "One", "All I Want Is You" and "If God Will Send His Angels" as mere pop tripe. I personally value any one of those songs more than the entire album of "War" (arguably the best album of their early period.)

      "Pop" was possible their worst album between Joshua Tree and their latest works, but I would hold up songs like "Staring at the Sun" against some of the best prog-rock of the 70s (or the best neo-prog bands like the Flaming Lips), and it would not suffer for the comparison.

      Did their "hey look at us pretend to be shallow, self-important pop divas" act get too old, too cute, and too tiresome? Yes. Absolutely. Every TV interview Bono gave during the 90s made me want to puke, but they created a lot of damn good music during that period.

      You are entitled to disagree, but calling music that many other people like and connect with "souless, meaningless, empty crap" in a public chat forum can't be considered anythign other than inflamitory.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  65. How will the 'preload' work? by luiss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    iPods are officially one-way when it comes to transfering music. You can put music in, but not take it out. So, how will you get those preloaded tunes off your iPod and into your iTunes so that they don't get wiped out the first time you sync your iPod?
    Maybe they come with a music store "gift certificate" or something? You buy the ipod, then logon to download your "preload" ?

    1. Re:How will the 'preload' work? by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      My iPod needed to be formatted and have the main OS installed on it when I bought it. That seems to be the norm, so I would assume it would be something like a gift cert. It would be pretty worthless to pay extra for U2 music pre-loaded just to have iTunes blast it on first sync.

      Not to mention those that will want to use it on Windows have to put a FAT32 format on it anyway. If it came pre-loaded and formatted for Mac, it's useless to Windows users. That is, unless Apple has gotten over thier NIH syndrome and is going to load them with FAT32 since Mac users can read that format as well.

      Maybe a cupon code to get your free download? Even over dialup an album or two in AAC isn't going to take that long to download.

    2. Re:How will the 'preload' work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bummer, because I just copied all my content from my iPod to my laptop.

      I just plugged it in and did a "copy" using Explorer.

      So many they don't officially mention that in the documentation, but there is absoluetely nothing to prevent you from using an iPod as a disk drive to put stuff on and take stuff off of the iPod.

    3. Re:How will the 'preload' work? by csimpkin · · Score: 1

      If I had to guess I would say that when you install the iTunes software off of the cd that comes with the iPod, the songs will be on your computer. That way, when the iPod syncs the songs get transfered.

    4. Re:How will the 'preload' work? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Um, actually, they publicly flaunt that you get to use your iPod as an external harddrive for non-music files... That is one of their selling points in justifying large harddrives for people with non-large ammounts of music.

  66. It may be that U2 doesn't want to by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    After reading this interview with The Edge, I wonder if the group would rather some of their songs stay buried in the past.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:It may be that U2 doesn't want to by LTB_Enterprises · · Score: 1

      It could be worse, it could come preloaded with Passengers Original Soundtracks 1.

  67. But what if I already have the new U2 album? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U2's "How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb" is already sitting on my harddrive. It's filename is U2 How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb 2004 Mp3 192Kbps By Obl.rar and on the eDonkey network it has a hash of E18BD546BC53834B705533CFE5EE9A44.

    You don't have to buy the new iPod "blackenstein" edition just to hear the latest U2 recordings.. what a concept!

    Hey, while we're at it, let's pull BitTorrent into the equation. here's the torrent for their new single :)

    1. Re:But what if I already have the new U2 album? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh.. did I mention that that file is a fake?!

      Nothing to see here :)

  68. DRM on pre-loaded songs? by jhkoh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The big question is: What kind of DRM will be on the pre-loaded songs? When you buy songs from the iTunes Music Store, the files are DRM'ed so that only your authorized copies of iTunes will play them. These pre-loaded files will have to playable on every installation of iTunes out there...?!?

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. Uhhh, am i missing something by pexisnotgood · · Score: 1

    if the u2Pod comes preloaded, how the hell does the music survive first initiazation? And if the music if fairplayed, how does it know what account to bind to? chicken or egg....

  71. The more things change... by Distan · · Score: 1

    A black apple? Nothing new here, they did this back in the 1980's:

    Black Apple

    I think these are pretty collectable today.

    1. Re:The more things change... by hc00jw · · Score: 1

      And in the 1990's:

      Performa 5400

      I don't think apple are afraid to get fruity either...

  72. Re:Finally! by mbbac · · Score: 1

    HP did that already. I think they call them tattoos. It's a printable skin you wrap around the Ipod and they provide artist related images for you to print on them.

    --

    mbbac

  73. These Guys Are From England.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  74. So did W.A.S.P. in the 1980's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with the great whispered lyrics "handcuff me" added in for good measure. Only later in life did I realize that this was a cover song originally done by the Rolling Stones.

  75. This is not a rebel iPod... by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    ...this is a BLACK iPod.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
  76. Makes Sense Though by EXTomar · · Score: 1

    The problem is that relic music companies only want to sell you music. We all know how easy it is to manipulate the disk into a format you want instead of the one they want to sell us. At this point there is very little value in "just music" releases.

    However if you start tying in special stuff like with what is going on here with U2 and Apple, people will more than happily give you money. You've now given them the music in a format they like better *and* gave them value added stuff that can't be ripped from a CD or duplicated (the black iPod).

    This is the future of music and media. Just selling the music/information is not enough because it is marginalized by copying no matter what protection schemes they try to throw in. The future is "music/information" + "goodies".

  77. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to be that guy, but this seems worth it.

  78. didn't you read the sticker on the back... by Poppler · · Score: 1

    And what the hell does Apple care how people get their music? That's not their responcibility.

    actually they seem to think it is. they do use a lot of "anti-piracy" protection that just hurts functionality. I record my own music. If I put it on my ipod, I can't copy it to another machine, or even back to my own (my ipod has as much HD space as both my computers combined... pathetic, I know). Now I have to make 2 copies of the same file - one so I can listen to it, the other so I can use the ipod as an external HD. It's a pain in the ass. Not to mention that they won't let you burn CD's from the ipod, which is just rediculous.

    Of coarse I agree that they SHOULDN'T care, but sadly that's not the case.

    --
    What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    1. Re:didn't you read the sticker on the back... by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      Grab one of the 3rd party utilities and put it on your iPod in HD mode. There are some that don't even need an installer, they can run FROM the iPod. Now you can copy stuff back off the iPod all you like.

  79. I need something darker than black by deft · · Score: 1

    reminds me of the quote fromt he letterman/leno fued tv movie

    "This is new york. We only wear black, till something darker comes along"

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:I need something darker than black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Midnight blue.

  80. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a free ipod from freeipods.com, paint it black, then download U2's complete works off bittorrent.

  81. OT: Earplugs by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Earplugs rock. Particularly because it filters out other crap you hear (glass or chairs rattling in a venue, annoying guy next to you) and leaves you with a good headphone-esque volume in your ear during the show.

    I'm still rather young to speak like an old goat about this, but earplugs are the only way I listen to shows anymore. I got tired of the ear ringing directly after, and having everybody shout at you when talking to you for the next 2 days. I love music so much, that I want to protect my hearing and be able to enjoy it for the rest of my life.

    --

    Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  82. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can buy the Gateway 2000 version of the cowPod now!

  83. I don't think that's what he says by Zlurg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who says it has to be Spanish? LOTS of languages use uno, dos and tres as their first three numbers. I'll tell you what, though, there are a couple that use quatro-variants as #4, pronounced entirely differently from Espanol...
    ...say, akin to "KAT-ruh"
    I know this because I once owned an Italian car called the Masarati Quattroporte, pronounced "KATruh-port"

    And by the time I get this posted, I'm sure 6 others will point out that 14 DOES come after 3.

    1. Re:I don't think that's what he says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Who says it has to be Spanish?

      Well...the reason that many languages have numbers similar to uno, dos, tres, quatro (and words in general) is that they're all romance languages (derived from latin).

      Spanish: uno, dos, tres, quatro
      French: un, deux, trois, quatre
      Italian: uno due, tre, quatro
      Portugese: um, dois, tres, quatro
      Romanian: unu, doi, trei, patru
      Catalan: un, dos, tres, catre
      Latin: unus, duos, tres, quattuor

      So, unless I'm missing one or more romance languages, then uno-dos-tres-quatro uniquely identifies Spanish.

  84. Troll?! its a JOKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This got modded TROLL!? Its a joke.... "I still haven't found what I'm looking for" ... its a U2 song... work with me here folks!

  85. Half an iPod by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "Forbes is carrying the story that U2 and Apple will be releasing a custom black iPod that comes preloaded with the band's new album as well as portions of the band's 25-year back catalog."

    A portion? Only a portion? For the price this thing is gonna cost you, you better get their entire compilation of music.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Half an iPod by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      "Forbes is carrying the story that U2 and Apple will be releasing a custom black iPod that comes preloaded with the band's new album as well as portions of the band's 25-year back catalog."

      A portion? Only a portion? For the price this thing is gonna cost you, you better get their entire compilation of music.

      --
      You want a Free iPod too, dontcha? [freeipods.com]


      Cost? I thought they were free?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  86. "Will the price be higher?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair to the grandparent poster, the great-grandparent poster should have said "Will the price be higher than the current iPod?" instead of letting it sound like they mean "Will the price be higher than the iPod with U2 on it?"

    1. Re:"Will the price be higher?" by meme_police · · Score: 1

      We're only talking about one item so when he asks "Will the price be higher?" I take that as meaning "Will the price of the one and only black iPod that includes U2 content be higher than the current iPod?". I have a good feeling it will be more expensive.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    2. Re:"Will the price be higher?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what about the black-loving non-U2 fan? Will the price be higher?"

      this is saying that he is concerend that the price for the black one will be higher without u2 on it.

      he is basically saying, what about me i dont like u2. will the price be higher for me?

    3. Re:"Will the price be higher?" by meme_police · · Score: 1

      Damn, I didn't realize ACs were so dense. I'll guarantee there will be no black iPod without the U2 content unless you buy a used one from someone who has removed the U2 stuff. It's a U2 promo, U2 = black iPod, Black iPod = U2. I know what the original person was saying, if he wants the black iPod he's going to have to pay extra for the U2 content.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

  87. Preloaded? by mbbac · · Score: 1

    Are they really preloaded on the Ipod? Because, once you connect the Ipod to the computer, Itunes will ask you if you want to overwrite the library on the Ipod with the library in Itunes.

    I'd imagine there is a disc in the box.

    --

    mbbac

  88. Re:Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it a free download? That could have something to do with it...

  89. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  90. Re:Downhill, aging talent by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    Could you name 3 more past-their-prime bands? REM and U2 were great bands back in the day, but come on....I don't see much coming from their support of electronic distribution.

    People are FAR more excited about getting a black iPod than in getting an iPod preloaded with U2 songs. How do you get the songs off of there anyway? doesn't iTunes overwrite an iPod which is newly linked to it?

  91. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy a $300 album if it came with a free iPod...

  92. Isn't the problem with this rumour that.... by Freddles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if the music is pre-loaded, then when it is first synched with iTunes, the pre-loaded music will be deleted?

    Surely it's more likely that they would bundle the iPod with an iTunes Music Store Voucher for the 'free' tracks so the user can download them themselves. This would keep all the DRM intact.

  93. Beating a (black) dead horse by plopez · · Score: 1

    Or "Back Sabbath" or "Black Snake" or "Black 47" or "Black Uhuru". The iPod will also be locked so you cannot load "The White Album". :)

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Beating a (black) dead horse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A nice copy of Back in Black for me.

      This one actually goes nicely with my black Wallstreet Powerbook.

      Hmmmm?

  94. Figuring out the ways to get this the cheapest ... by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm trying to figure out the ways to get this the cheapest. I suppose this will not be available in any other store than the Apple retail store or Apple's online store...

    1) Use a paypal debit card (1.5% back) or other credit card cash back or point reward card (up to 4%)

    2) Buy under a program like MyPoints using the affiliate Apple Store Link = a 5% yield in converted to cash points

    3) Least useful tip: have the item shipped where Apple does not charge sales tax

    Can anyone else think of any other ways to save money on such an item to yield it for the lowest price?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  95. I keep looking for U2 in wikipedia...... by harumscarum · · Score: 0

    and it keeps bring up this

  96. Actually the next one by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    will be a Negativland iPod with a spy plane painted on it.

    It's also black.

  97. Please People... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This has nothing to do with discrimination!

    This is Apple's weak attempt of dealing with the soon-to-be-superior PSP which will play mp3s, watch movies and play games.

    Read the most recent Newsweek magazine and you'd know Steve Jobs is worried since PSP debuts at $300 with all the above features.

    A new color to spice up marketing AND match the PSP's color, is the least Apple can do.

    1. Re:Please People... by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Did you know that the PSP doesn't have a harddrive?
      Did you know that the PSP doesn't have writable media?
      Did you know that you'll have to put the music on a Sony flash card?
      Did you know that the only movies you'll be able to watch will have to be specially purchased and not playable in anything else?

      Just checking.

    2. Re:Please People... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The PSP? You are comparing the iPod to the PSP? You're comparing a 40GB hard drive music player to a piece of equipment that is disc-based, has poor power management, keeps getting pushed back and doesn't have the games to launch before Christmas?

      Using your logic: I can pick up a shareware app to rip DVDs to a 128MB Memory Stick and watch movies on my Sony Ericsson P900, which would allow me to "play mp3s, watch movies and play games" and use it as a planner, a Bluetooth remote, a cell phone and a digital camera. Doesn't mean that it's replacing my iPod at any point. The iPod goes more places with me than the P900 does...

      So my question to you is: What the hell are you smoking, where did you get it and will you share? Because you are smoking some SERIOUS shit...

    3. Re:Please People... by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      "Discriminating ear" is another way of saying you have good taste; not that you were guilty of discrimination. :)

    4. Re:Please People... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love short-visioned apple fanatics.

      Watch as PSP will have more plugins than iPod could ever dream of. What makes you think Sony is locked in permanently to a 128MB memory stick.

    5. Re:Please People... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Always funny how it's people like you who don't have the balls to post under their handle.

      Or the eyes to actually read the text as written.

      The adults are speaking right now. Go back to playing with your toys and don't worry your pretty little head about things that are too complex for you to grasp.

    6. Re:Please People... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Apple dropped the ball on this one. This is not a breakthrough, this is not something I, as a Mac user or a computer user in general, cannot live without. And the name is just sad - just damn sad." -

  98. The preshipped songs are by U2. by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hopefully, once you reformat, they will be gone forever.

  99. Damn thats sexy... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Apple should work out a deal with these guys. Get custom options like PC manufactuers like Alienware.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Damn thats sexy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sexy? You want sexy with an iPod?? Here ya go!! (warning: nsfw)

      Hehe. :)

  100. Italian Nazi by jesushaces · · Score: 1

    i must tell you that Quattro is not pronounced KATruh-port... the italian particle "Qu" is closer to "Kw" than to K{vowel} so Quattro sounds kwa-t-tro there is a VERY small -but nonetheless, it's there- pause between the T's, 'elongating' the sound. (Happens with every double consonant in italian). Also, 'Porte' sounds "Porte" (the e as in 'echo', you don't leave out the vowels in italian.. And also i think it is a Maserati. Don't take it personal, it's constructive criticism.

  101. Let's break down those costs... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    ...from the Rolling Stone article:

    $0.17 Musicians' unions
    $0.80 Packaging/manufacturing
    $0.82 Publishing royalties
    $0.80 Retail profit
    $0.90 Distribution
    $1.60 Artists' royalties
    $1.70 Label profit
    $2.40 Marketing/promotion
    $2.91 Label overhead
    $3.89 Retail overhead

    What if someone like, say, U2 went exclusively to downloads for an album. You'd get the music, and maybe a jpeg to print a cd cover, plus other downloadable goodies (maybe exclusive videos or something). The following costs could be changed:

    $0.00 Packaging/manufacturing; what packaging and manufacturing is involved in the download process? Nothing. All these costs will go into production overhead.

    $0.45 Distribution; I'm just taking a shot in the dark at this one, but distribution of electronic music basically means managed hosting of servers, so you could cut costs a lot here.

    $1.75 Marketing/promotion; I think you could cut this even more, but I'm thinking of things like posters, carboard advertisements, etc, at record stores. They wouldn't be a factor anymore. Basically just advertising would be costs...magazine ads and commercials.

    $0.00 Retail overhead; this goes away completely. Distribution costs cover this. No displays, no shipping, no stocking, no storage, none of those costs. You enter your credit card number, click an icon, and bang, music is on its way from the server.

    That brings the price down to $10.20; and let me say, I'm EXTREMELY suspicious of that $2.91 figure for label overhead. I think that's mostly bullshit, and I wouldn't be surprised if the real number were half of that.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Let's break down those costs... by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      > $0.45 Distribution; I'm just taking a shot in the dark at this one, but distribution of electronic music basically means managed hosting of servers, so you could cut costs a lot here.

      If having massive infrastructure to support downloads was cheap, Apple would be making more than a marginal profit.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    2. Re:Let's break down those costs... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      $0.45 Distribution...
      If having massive infrastructure to support downloads was cheap, Apple would be making more than a marginal profit.

      Actually, $0.45 is a high estimate for distribution costs. Apple retains about four cents from the sale of each track. The lion's share--about two thirds of your $0.99--goes to labels.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  102. Better than white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'bout time someone did something to make it a little more cool. Can't believe all these plaudits for design that've been running around...previously waay too girlie for a real man. White high heels anyone?

  103. Will iTunes Wipe the Black iPods? by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    Please note that you are NOT allowed to distribute this file online

    Your post got me thinking. iTunes controls the songs that are on the iPod. From what I understand, if one connects an iPod to a computer with iTunes running, iTunes will delete the songs on the iPod that are not also in its library.

    Is this true? (I don't own an iPod.) If so, it might be trivial for Apple to release an update to iTunes (maybe even via the black u2Pods) which will disable this iTunes "feature." But if this happens, does that means iTunes will from that moment on refrain from deleting songs from connected iPods?

    I apologize if I am completely mis-thinking how iPods and iTunes interact, in which case here is your money back: ø

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Will iTunes Wipe the Black iPods? by csimpkin · · Score: 1

      On the windows version, you can disable the 'automatic update' feature that deletes the songs from the ipod that have been removed from your library in iTunes.

    2. Re:Will iTunes Wipe the Black iPods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they could ship on the data portion so you add them to your library like other music.

      or possibly it comes with a cd of the songs too.

      or maybe it comes with a lobster and a rhino.

    3. Re:Will iTunes Wipe the Black iPods? by guuyuk · · Score: 1

      The Mac version is the same way. It changes a setting on the iPod. I changed mine to manual syncing when I first hooked it up. I have since hooked it up to 3 or 4 other machines and have never had it ask to wipe the iPod since (including new machines with default iTunes loads).

      You can also play music off the iPod while it's connected to the computer through iTunes. I have my main library playing straight through and the iPod playing in ramdom order. ITunes recognizes that the iPod is set to random mode.

      --
      We're sorry, the phone number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try your call again
  104. Exactly! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So an iPod is INSURANCE.
    If you have a $3,000 CD collection (say half used, half new, $8 for used, $16 for new, $24 for two CDs, then $3k is 250 CDs, if there is 50 minutes of music per CD and you rip at 1mb/minute, that's 12500mb or 12.5gb of music) a $400 iPod is CHEAP insurance vs getting CDs scratched, lost, or stolen.

    If you have a $6,000 CD collection, then you have 25gb of music. If you rip at higher than 128kbps, but say 224kbps, then a $6k CD collection will take approximately 50gb!

    So iPods really do make sense if you've been buying 2 CDs a month for the past 10 years (that's 24 a year, 240 total).

  105. a thenichal question - if you please by amichalo · · Score: 1

    not to squelch the joking around about streets yet to be named, but I have a legit QUESTION:

    I presumed that Apple's DRM worked by encoding a song with a particular user's ID, then transmitting it down. It would take that user's ID to unlock the song and thus, the DRM would work.

    So how the heck will this work for the iPod? I am assuming you can take the music OFF the iPod and add it to iTunes but then you would just have this AAC file without DRM or with DRM you can't decrypt.

    So this leads me to believe you will NOT be able to remove the songs from the iPod - they become like demo versions of video games on a CD you get with your modem. You can play the songs on the iPod all you want, but you gotta BUY them if you want to play them on iTunes.

    Clever Apple, very clever.

    If this is so, then I would suspect from now until forever, iPods will come preloaded with some songs, or perhaps photos, because it is such a great way to promote.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  106. German Punk Band sells preloaded MP3 USB Stick by j0kkk3l · · Score: 1

    The German fun Punk Band Wizo http://www.wizo.de claims to be the first band to release an Album on an USB-Stick. http://www.wizo.de/stick

    The stick contains 5 songs, pictures, lyrics, guitar tabs and videos of the band. You also get 4 stickers with the band logo and a lanyard.

    For the 64 MB Stick you pay only 15,90 ! http://hulkshop.de/catalog/product_info.php?produc ts_id=219
    Hell, you can even get the stick and throw away the music! That's how it should be!

    1. Re:German Punk Band sells preloaded MP3 USB Stick by Ricwot · · Score: 1

      It's also being done by the Ministry of Sound, I saw it in Argos.

  107. Custom if each iPod has a unique copy of songs by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    If each iPod has unique Fairplay associated copy of U2's songs, does that qualify for 'custom'?

    1. Re:Custom if each iPod has a unique copy of songs by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Only if each one has a different set of songs, and the owner gets to choose them.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Custom if each iPod has a unique copy of songs by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      If it's a unique version, can you really call it a copy?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  108. Re:Figuring out the ways to get this the cheapest by babyrat · · Score: 1


    Can anyone else think of any other ways to save money on such an item to yield it for the lowest price?


    Steal it

  109. Replacable covers by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    This seems pretty unlikely to me.

    Apple must gain a lot of mindshare from the fact that most iPODs look very similar. With custom covers they aren't likely to blend in. Also most cellphones that have changable facias feel cheap.

    Plus now having a custom ipod requires you dropping $$$$ to apple, not $10 to a cheap faceplate company in china.

  110. Control Covers? Not according to Mechanicals... by weston · · Score: 1

    He can control (or 50% control with Sony now) who covers the songs

    AFAIK, anyone can cover just about anything by paying mechanical royalties to the publisher who holds the copyrights. Not super expensive either... think the rate is .08 per recording.

  111. Re:Figuring out the ways to get this the cheapest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, seeing as how that would be next to impossible to do from an online store and I would imagine - very difficult to do from an Apple Store - no moderation for you.

  112. It's the wild colour scheme that freaks me... by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time you try to operate one of the weird black controls that are labelled in black on a black background, a little black light lights up black to let you know youve done it.

    1. Re:It's the wild colour scheme that freaks me... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Screw U2, I want an iPod that comes with the radio play and has "Don't Panic" written on the front!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:It's the wild colour scheme that freaks me... by 68kmac · · Score: 1
      I want an iPod that comes with the radio play

      Incidentally, I just received confirmation from the BBC shop that my copy of the third Hitch Hiker's Guide radio show has shipped, so I'll soon be having this (minus the "Don't Panic" sticker, alas ...) :-)

  113. Just what I need! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An iPod that works half the time and wants things for free.

  114. Watch your assumptions by djw · · Score: 1
    Who says he was just counting? Maybe he was listing, say, numerators of continued fraction convergents to sqrt(8).

    And he did it in Spanish just to show off.

    1. Re:Watch your assumptions by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      that's funny stuff.

  115. MICHAEL JACKSON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he's broke, you know. rode too many giraffes and little boys.

  116. Is this okay with Apple Records? by cyclobotomy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Didn't a previous article previously reported on slashdot say that Apple computer is okay selling music as long as it doesn't sell it on a physical medium, so as not to directly compete with the Apple Records?

    From MacNewsWorld:

    ...one of those passages in the court document strongly implies that Apple Corps agreed to allow Apple (Computer) to pursue digital music initiatives, but not package, sell or distribute any physical music materials such as CDs.

  117. Obviously an update for software by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I think it's pretty obvious they will ship with sofwtare that basically makes the files owned by the first user that connects - so as soon as you connect with iTunes the music will be synced to your computer and it will live in both places, and possibly tie your username with the files.

    I really can't imagine they would do it any other way.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  118. Why do people think this will be trouble? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Obviously Apple will update iTunes and/or the iPod firmware to allow pre-loaded songs to become part of your library, and they will be back synced to your computer.

    It's all just software! Just because you can't do it now doesn't mean it can't be made to, or indeed has not already had the capability put in place laying latent for some time.

    You know this will happen because there is no alternative that really makes any sense, and fits Apple's MO.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  119. What I want to see... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

    The Purple iPod. Two circle-shaped holes are cut out of the back so you can see the circuits. Later the name of this iPod is changed to "".

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:What I want to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash: they already do an iPod Mini. Drop it on its head a few times and I'm sure it'll act in much the same way as TAFKAP.

  120. Save the U2 video easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Load the iTunes/Safari QT video, now open your Terminal and copy and paste the following:

    cp -v `lsof |grep -i QTP| grep iTunes|awk '{ print $9 }'` ~/Desktop/currentmusicvideo.mov

    For Safari:

    cp -v `lsof |grep -i QTP| grep Safari|awk '{ print $9 }'` ~/Desktop/currentmusicvideo.mov

    Wait and click on your Desktop

    Click her to go to iTunes and buy something

  121. Re:Is There Anything Sadder by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Than someone with neither the talent to make that much money, and the heart to give so much of his resources and *time* away, being laughed at by some sad git on Slashdot?

  122. Shiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All hail the new iDRMpod with the new Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonny_Bono_Copyrigh t_ Term_Extension_Act

    ahahahahahahahahahah

  123. Ogg Vorbis or bust. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

    Won't buy one until they support Ogg Vorbis. Be it by hack or by Apple, I care not.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis or bust. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Can't you run Linux on it? I'd imagine that will support Vorbis eventually...

      ...the problem, though, is that you'd probably have a hard time syncing it. And if you can't sync with iTunes and you're not using the nice interface, why did you buy an iPod in the first place?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis or bust. by onlyconnect · · Score: 1

      > why did you buy an iPod in the first place?

      Errrmmm ... he said he didn't. Nor did I.

      Tim

    3. Re:Ogg Vorbis or bust. by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Argh! Sorry about that, I mistyped -- I meant to say "would," not "did."

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  124. Pigs fly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always said that the only way I'd listen to U2 is if I was forced to.

  125. Functionality by rudiger · · Score: 1

    How will this work? I am assuming it will still function as a regular iPod. But when I plug my iPod (that is, one w/ music on it), in to someone else's laptop, it prompts me as to whether I want to associate that person's library w/ my iPod.

    The gist of it is, if I have an iPod with stuff on it, and give it to someone else, they can't have my stuff. Their stuff will just overwrite mine. SO the first time one sync's this iPod, will they lose the U2 shit? The notion of a pre-loaded iPod doesn't make sense to me.

  126. Re:U2 preloaded? by tabrnaker · · Score: 0

    It will in canada, can't charge the copywrite levy on media that comes with pre-recorded audio!

  127. obligatory conspiracy theory by calculadoru · · Score: 1

    doesn't anyone else here find it slightly odd that U2 are now prereleasing their stuff on iPod, after all that hoopla about the Edge losing a CD with all their new songs during a photoshoot? think about it:
    1. if that had been true, all the songs would have ended up on Suprnova within three working days. to my knowledge, they have yet to appear on any of the p2p networks.
    2. Bono starts going on about releasing the songs on iPod and what do you know, they come out with a none more black player loaded with their songs. /conspiracy theory

    not that anyone cares about U2 anymore anyway (I think that atrocious disco song did it for lots of people - plus Bono's voice seems to go higher with each album), but I thought I'd do my duty for the tinfoil-hat brigade :)

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
  128. Better yet by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    a video iPod that comes preloaded with 10 episodes of the Simpsons.

    They can call it "iCaramba."

  129. I like this idea by randy_harvey · · Score: 1

    I want a Def Leppard IPod with the Union Jack for the color scheme...

  130. In the early days of CD players... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there was a joke that they all came supplied with "Brothers in Arms" by Dire Straits, which was then the ubiquitous CD.

    Now its iPods, and nobody is laughing, because its not a joke any more.

  131. It's a bit late for charges of hypocrisy, no? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...to feed some starving African babies or support some whack hippy group and generally continue to stick their self-righteous noses in everything.

    It's really ironic that you're bashing Bono with such hackneyed right wing rhetoric when he has spent the past four years as a habitual guest in the Bush White House, traveling with Bush's Treasury Secretary, praying with Jesse Helms, calling on Bill Frist, and dining with Rupert Murdoch.

    Don't you recognize one of your own when you see him?

    1. Re:It's a bit late for charges of hypocrisy, no? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but Bush is clearly not one of "his own" either. Bush has not adopted Bono's proposal of total debt relief, but he's done astonishing work to help Africa. Many who celebrated President Clinton's rhetoric a few years ago have come to note that Bush has acted upon that which Clinton only spoke about.

      For all the criticism of Bush's lack of credibility with certain European "allies", African nations have probably never had a better friend in the White House than President Bush, and Bono, while socially very liberal on many issues (and probably hoping for a Kerry victory), has recognizes this fact.

  132. Here's your rebuttal by ppp · · Score: 1

    Achtung Baby. "Nuff said.

  133. All U2 Needs is a MAP or Pocket GPS ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The still haven't found what they are looking for,
    because they are on a street with no name,
    climbing over walls to get to you...

    Geez! A MAP and a pocket GPS would have helped out these guys A LOT!

  134. Next, the "all the oldies" unit by Animats · · Score: 1
    Sooner or later, someone will come out with something that has "all the oldies". There are about 2000 official "oldies" (contact your local Clear Channel station for a list). So why not just preload all of them. Negotiate a bulk rate.

    Or just program a device with a receiver to accumulate them from broadcast radio.

  135. Re:U2 preloaded? by Alan · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they'll find a way to get around that (ipod is re-recordable media, and therefor not fixed and therefor isn't pre-"recorded"). Or something like that.

  136. good news/bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good news - black ipod looks cool...

    bad news - now everyone knows your taste in music sucks...

  137. Re:Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it isn't. That would be INSANE of Apple after running that TV spot...

  138. That is SO true by GrodinTierce · · Score: 3, Funny

    I swear it's totally for real! Check this out if you don't believe me.

    :)

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
  139. Re:not a moron, he's just a puppet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.bonothepuppet.com/

  140. Like I care! by teckels · · Score: 1

    I'll buy an iPod around the same time Apple releases iTunes for the PocketPC.

  141. I love synergy !!! by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

    It is just great that various entities that I hate get together like this. It makes it so much easier for me to avoid them.

    Like now -- I am already avoiding iPods like the plague, but wouldn't you know it, soon while avoiding iPods i will also be avoiding U2 and Bono!!! It's like I am getting the U2-Bono avoidance for free!!! Isn't modern marketing great.

    And lets face it -- it is a match made in heaven -- both Bono and Apple are overhyped, attention craving, spineless moneysuckers that annihilate true culture any place they throd.

  142. Incompatible by xixax · · Score: 1

    I thought Negativland was incompatible, something about a namepace collision that lead to a runaway zombie process in the U2 legal module.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  143. Colette (Paris) sold already some black iPods by loolgeek · · Score: 1
    Apple already sold black iPods in the past. Mostly in Tokyo or Paris fashion stores. The fashion store "Colette + Comme des Garcons" sold those black iPod last summer:
    "Black iPod 20 Go + Comme des Garcons case

    A customised 20Go Apple iPod in black color with a very special case by Comme des Garcons in leather and aluminium. Limited edition of 10.

    1,500 USD"
    Okay it was a very limited edition and pretty expensive. Hope for those crazy 10 people who bought those early black iPod, that the new black iPod won't be exactly the same :)
  144. Apple Lossless by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    You do realize that not everybody rips to a lossy format, right? You can fill up an iPod a lot faster that way.

    Also, it can be used for file storage too, and a 60GB iPod would be perfect for backing up the 60GB hard drive in my iBook.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  145. Canadian Levy by qedigital · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see if this player will be sold in Canada and if so, whether the CPCC Blank Media Levy will be charged. I don't understand why Apple doesn't include some demo track on the iPod to get around this $25 levy in Canada.
    Just my 2 bits (~1.6 bits US)

    --

    Rapidly approaching the Zener knee...

  146. excuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That text was a cut and paste from their website. And if you think that sentence correct, I suggest you look into an "edumucation" as well.

  147. a way around getting sued by boomerny · · Score: 1

    what if they sell you a blank iPod and give you some sort of code to enter on ITMS so you can download the songs afterwards? pain in the ass for the consumer but it would probably work.

  148. Will it have by ivano · · Score: 1
    black buttons on a black background that light up black when you press them

    (Thanks to DNA)

    Ciao

  149. Two copies by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Like a CD?
    Or a backup?

    What's wrong with two copies?

    Alternatively, Apple COULD just bundle a CD containing all the songs as AACs.

    1. Re:Two copies by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Well, the difference is that both copies would be on the same device. Copies on seperate media is useful for a backup or use in two places at once, but copies on the same device are just wasteful.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  150. I love that one song... by Otto · · Score: 1

    I forget the name of it, but it's that one where the boy-being meets the girl-being beneath a silvery moon, which then explodes for no adequately explored reason. Great tune, man.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  151. Not really. by Otto · · Score: 1

    Really? I thought they had to have some kind of anyi-piracy thing so you couldn't give your mp3s away to people when you plugged into their PC. I guess I spoke without knowing on that part...

    Yes, but it's not particularly effective or anything.

    Basically, the iTunes software only supports putting music onto the iPod, not taking it back off onto the computer.

    But the iPod interfaces to the computer as a standard mass storage device, no drivers needed. A service gets installed with iTunes that will recognize when the iPod device appears (you plug it in) and it will give iTunes a kick to cause it to autosynchronize and such, and then it will unmount the iPod afterwards, but that service and iTunes isn't actually necessary to see the iPod as a mass storage device.

    The main protections are:
    1. Hidden directory for all the music/config files (attrib +H, sort of thing)
    2. Music gets sorted into 20-50 randomly chosen directories, with no obvious ordering mechanism. This is actually done for technical reasons relating to the FAT file system, but it makes it more difficult to find a particular song, sort of thing. However, it doesn't rename the tunes, so a simple filename search is effective. Or copy the whole mess over and sort it out using any mass MP3 renamer/organizer.

    Beyond that, it has no real protection at all.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Not really. by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      Will the iPod read files that aren't in those particular directories? (ie, is it just iTunes that picks them randomly, or does the iPod itself require it to have the names that iTunes picks for it) I'll probably be getting an iPod at some point in the future*, and I'd like to avoid having to use iTunes, since they don't have a linux version. It'd be much easier to just do a nice cp -R rather than having to put them into the same randomly-named directories. ( * Yeah, I did the silly freeipod thing. It says my order is in and "waiting for product". We'll see if I ever end up with an iPod, but I didn't think there was any shortage of them at the moment to need to backorder. )

    2. Re:Not really. by Graff · · Score: 1
      Will the iPod read files that aren't in those particular directories? (ie, is it just iTunes that picks them randomly, or does the iPod itself require it to have the names that iTunes picks for it)

      iTunes and the iPod both use XML database files to locate the music that they contain. When songs are put onto the iPod those songs are added to the database, along with most of the information in the ID3 tags. If the song isn't in the database then the iPod doesn't know it's there.

      This is done mainly to make the iPod more efficient. Instead of having to go through each file and read its ID3 tags every time the iPod opens up a file directory, the iPod can instead read through a simple, ordered file. This saves on time spent spinning the hard drive. Because of this the iPod is not only more responsive, but it also uses less power.

      So basically it comes down to the fact that if you want to use the music playing capabilities of the iPod you need to use software to manage the music on it. This doesn't stop you from putting music files on it that you don't intend to play, or from taking any and all files off the iPod by way of software other than iTunes.
    3. Re:Not really. by Otto · · Score: 1

      The iPod will read files anywhere. But in order for it to know about those files, a database must be created on the iPod telling it all this information. Contrary to the sibling's post, this database is *not* XML, but a binary format that has been pretty well documented at this point.

      So you can't simply put the music on and expect it to find it, because it won't. You need a program to write that database. There's a lot of software out there to do this.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Not really. by Graff · · Score: 1
      The iPod will read files anywhere. But in order for it to know about those files, a database must be created on the iPod telling it all this information. Contrary to the sibling's post, this database is *not* XML, but a binary format that has been pretty well documented at this point.

      Whups, you are right it's not XML. I got mixed up on that because practically every preference and database document that Apple uses is XML. (Actually Apple calls their flavor of XML a Property List, or PLIST)

      I believe that iTunes uses a PLIST but the iPod uses a binary format for the database files. Either way you are perfectly correct that there are programs other than iTunes out there that know how to format the database properly, you just have to poke around on the internet a bit to find them.
  152. OT: Romance languages by Spunk · · Score: 1

    You rock. As a language nerd, I appreciate your contribution :)

    However, Ethnologue lists 48(!) Romance/Italic languages. A quick check found that these also have over a million speakers each:

    • Galician (Spain, 3M)
    • Emiliano (Italy, 3M)
    • Ligurian (Italy, 1.8M)
    • Lombardo (Italy, 8M - even more than Catalan)
    • Napoletano (Italy, 7M - ditto)
    • Piemontese (Italy, 3M)
    • Sardinian (Italy, 1.5M)
    • Sicilian (Italy, 4M)
    • Veneto (Italy, 2M)
    • France has Alsatian - in the Germanic family - at 1.5M and several other Romance languages I couldn't find numbers for.

    As an American, I find that simply amazing. Sure, a US Midwesterner and an Aussie are gonna have some vocabulary issues, but it's very much the same language. Imagine speaking one language in your state/province, but another (related one) to relate to the rest of your country. The Germanic-speaking portions of Europe are like this too.

    Back on topic, sort of. One theory is that it's U2's fourteenth album. Or we can just assume Bono is dumb. :)

  153. Re:U2 preloaded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should in Canada, we have a blank media levy, which wouldn't apply to the preloaded iPods. (It does apply to the blank iPods)

    " iPod mini price includes CPCC's Blank Media Levy: $15"

  154. Charcoal by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    ... or Ebony
    Sable?
    Midnight?

    Something hip and cool, but not quite black?

    Ah: "P-Diddy!"

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  155. GOOD MORNING BUDAPEST! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 0

    haha

  156. Re:Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Forbes says "Vertigo has topped the iTunes download charts since its debut three weeks ago". The itunes chart..

    Is this the new metric on song popularity?


    It is if you're getting info off an Apple press release...
  157. Shameless library plug by Otto · · Score: 1

    And if you want to roll your own, then look no further than here: http://otto.homedns.org:8888/iTunes/iPodDB.zip

    It's a set of c++ classes that implement the binary format of the iTunesDB. It's not optimized, it's a bit slow, and it's a memory hog from hell, but it's also very instructive in making a DIY project if you want.

    It's written for Windows and the foo_pod plugin for Foobar 2000, but it should be easy to port over to Linux or what have you.

    I wrote it mainly to get something going with regards to development for the iPod, and Aero picked it up to develop the foo_pod plugin with, along with greatly helping me flesh it out and support everything. I can say, without any doubt, that it supports more of the iPod functionality and capability than anything else on Windows, with the exception of iTunes (and it beats iTunes in some minor respects).

    Probably not totally useful to use as is (although it does work perfectly), but as a reference code, it's wonderful. By organizing the various atoms in the iTunesDB file into separate classes and so on, it builds a copy of the tree structure in memory using objects, which makes it easy to figure out how the file is laid out and how to use it properly, if you want to do so. Supports all known fields in the iTunesDB, supports OTGPlaylists, EQSettings, PlayCounts file, everything.

    Just thought I'd throw a plug in for it. It's BSD licensed, so go nuts. The more software that supports my iPod, the happier it makes me. :)

    And check out the foo_pod plugin for Foobar 2000. Excellent tool. Beats iTunes up down and sideways.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  158. I want those headphones... by omahajim · · Score: 1

    ...from the commercials. These people are jumping and gyrating all over the place, and their white apple headphones are staying in their ears. What's wrong with this picture. Those of you who have an ipod know.

  159. Re:Downhill, aging talent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, let's see. How about Aerosmith, Van Halen, and Rush? All still active but waaaaaaaay past their prime. Ooh, or how's this? Ratt, Poison, and Scorpions. Bwahahahaha!!! :)

  160. Re:Finally! by Golias · · Score: 1

    iTunes stores album art images (or a different image, if you prefer) with the info tags of each song, and songs downloaded from the iTunes Music Store have the album art attached by default.

    As soon as color screens are cheap enough, you can bet that there will be a new generation of iPods which display the album art for the currently-playing song.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  161. I just got the John Kerry ipod by grilla · · Score: 1

    It's black too. No wait now its white. No wait now its blue. No wait now its red..............Bad thing is it plays the same tune over and over and over again.